Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 30,1
May 2000
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, Republic of
South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of
the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is
devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Two booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20 and (b) to Vols 21-25, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many botanical artists have contributed to
the series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian Condy, Betty Connell, Stella
Gower, Rosemary Holcroft, Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire Linder-
Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased to receive living plants of general interest
or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia
and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the informa-
tion is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidium, 1983, by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium), 1989, by J.M.
& H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. &
H.M. Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 3 17, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stemming the Sixth Extinction, 1999,
by J.M. Anderson (ed.)
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 30,1
Scientific Editor: G. Germishuizen
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NASIONALE BOTANIESE
INSTITUUT
Private Bag X101 PRETORIA 0001
2000 -05- | 7 S
Pflvaatsak X 101 PRETORIA 0001
national botanical
INSTITUTE
NATIONAL
O T A N I C A L
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
May 2000
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Archer, Mrs C., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Barrington, Dr D.S., University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
Bhat, Prof. R.B., University of Transkei, RSA.
Boucher, Prof. C., University of Stellenbosch, RSA.
Burgoyne, Ms P., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Cook, Prof. C.D.K., University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Forster, P.I., Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Australia.
Goldblatt, Dr P, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA.
Hammer, S., Sphaeroid Institute, Vista, USA.
Hanna, Dr W., Coastal Plain Experimental Station, Tifton, USA.
Ihlenfeldt, Prof. H-D., Waabs/Longholz, Germany.
Jordaan, Mrs M., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Leistner, Dr O.A., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Long, Dr D.G., Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, UK.
Louw, Dr A., Nelspruit, RSA.
Manning, Dr J., National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Mucina, Prof. L., Kuwait University. Present address: University of Stellenbosch, RSA
Nelson, Dr E.C., Outwell, Wisbech, UK.
Oliver, Dr E.G.H., National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Phillipson, Dr P.B., Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA.
Rauh, Prof. W., Heidelberg, Germany.
Retief, Ms E., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Rourke, Dr J.P, National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Smith, Prof. G.F., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Steyn, Dr E.M.A., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Thiede, Dr J., University of Cologne, Germany.
Thulin, Dr M.L., University of Uppsala, Sweden.
Van Jaarsveld, E.J., National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Van Wyk, Prof. A.E., University of Pretoria, RSA.
Van Wyk, Prof. B-E., Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, RSA.
Verdcourt, Dr B., Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Yatskievych, Dr G., Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA.
CONTENTS
Volume 30,1
New genus, species and combinations in Bothalia 30,1 (2000) iv
1. Notes on the genus Frithia (Mesembryanthemaceae) and the description of a new species, F. humilis,
in South Africa. P.M. BURGOYNE, G.F. SMITH and F. DU PLESSIS 1-7
2. A review of generic concepts in the Stilbaceae. J.P ROURKE 9 ~~
3. Studies in the Sphaerocarpales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Sphaerocarpos and its
only local species, S. stipitatus. S.M. PEROLD 17 --2.4
4. FSA contributions 15: Piperaceae. K.L. IMMELMAN 25 — 3^
5. FSA contributions 16: Sphenocleaceae. W.G. WELMAN 31—33
6. Taxonomic studies in the Aizoaceae from South Africa: three new species and some new combina-
tions. C. KLAK 35 -U'i
7. Notes on African plants:
Agavaceae. Agave vivipara : a naturalised alien in southern Africa. E.M.A. STEYN and
G.F. SMITH 43
Asphodelaceae: Alooideae. The genus Poellnitzia included in Astroloba. J.C. MANNING and
G.F. SMITH 53
Asphodelaceae: Alooideae. Aloe delphinensis in Aloe sect. Lomatophyllum. PI. FORSTER ... 53 —
Ericaceae. Two new species of Erica from Western Cape, South Africa. E.G.H. OLIVER and
I.M. OLIVER 49-^3
Hyacinthaceae. Correction of a historical error in the taxonomic description of Urginea ciliata.
A.P DOLD and R. MOBERG 46 -U-8
8. Morphology and anatomy of the rhizome and frond in the African species of Polystichum (Pteropsida:
Dryopteridaceae). J.P. ROUX and A.E. VAN WYK 57 — 6 c?
9. The epidermis in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic significance.
C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 69 -
10. Vegetation of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands south of George, South Africa. D.B. HOARE,
J.E. VICTOR, R.A. LUBKE and L. MUCINA 87-96
11. Checklist of plant species of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands, south of George, South Africa.
J.E. VICTOR, D.B. HOARE and R.A. LUBKE 97 - to I
12. Miscellaneous notes:
Hyacinthaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 13. Lachenalia mutabilis, L. pustulata and
L. unicolor. J.J. SPIES, J.L. DU PREEZ, A. MINNAAR and R. KLEYNHANS 106 - 1 lo
Poaceae. Apomictic embryo sac development in Cenchrus ciliaris (Panicoideae). N.C. VISSER,
J.J. SPIES and H.J.T. VENTER 103 ^ / o*G
13. Obituaries:
Leslie Edward Wostall Codd (1908-1999). B. DE WINTER and G. GERMISHUIZEN Ill - 0 S'
Hugh Colin Taylor (1925-1999). D.J. MCDONALD, C. BOUCHER and E.G.H. OLIVER ... 115-110
Barbara Joan Jeppe (1921-1999): botanical artist extraordinaire. G.F. SMITH and E.M.A.
STEYN 119 -111
14. Book reviews 123
On 37 E2S©r4 , If ■ I'd . ({suruu.0 1-2. w-
G-, f ; (2 3,124-
6 LE N , R. , H • f, ' 1 7. t|
New genus, species and combinations in Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Antimima excedens ( L.Bolus ) Klak, comb, nov., 35
Astroloba rubriflora ( L.Bolus ) G.F. Sm. & J.C. Manning, comb, nov., 53
Brownanthus fraternus Klak, sp. nov., 37
Brownanthus glareicola Klak, sp. nov., 37
Erepsia dunensis ( Sond .) Klak, comb, nov., 38
Erica columnaris E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 50
Erica orthiocola E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 49
Frithia humilis P.M.Burgoyne, sp. nov., 1
Hammeria meleagris ( L.Bolus ) Klak, comb, nov., 39
Kogelbergia Rourke, genus novum, 12
Kogelbergia phylicoides (A. DC.) Rourke, comb, nov., 13
Kogelbergia verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyli.) Rourke, comb, nov., 12
Scopelogena bruynsii Klak, sp. nov., 39
Stilbe gymnopharyngia ( Rourke ) Rourke, comb, nov., 11
Stilbe overbergensis Rourke, nom. nov., 1 1
Stilbe serrulata ( Hochst .) Rourke, comb, nov., 11
iv
Bothalia 30,1 : 1-7 (2000)
Notes on the genus Frithia (Mesembryanthemaceae) and the descrip-
tion of a new species, F. humilis , in South Africa
P.M. BURGOYNE*, G.F. SMITH* and F. DU PLESSIS**
Keywords: Frithia N.E.Br., Mesembryanthemaceae, new species, South Africa, summer rainfall mesembs, taxonomy, window plants
ABSTRACT
Frithia N.E.Br. (Mesembryanthemaceae), formerly thought to be a monotypic genus, has been found to comprise two
species. Populations from the eastern parts of the distribution range of Frithia pulchra N.E.Br. are recognised as a distinct
species, Frithia humilis P.M.Burgoyne. The genus has a limited distribution, although present in three provinces of South
Africa, namely Gauteng, North-West and Mpumalanga. The two window-leaved species are allopatric and morphological
differences between the roots, leaves, flowers, pollen, capsules and seeds are discussed. A formal description of the new
species, an identification key and a distribution map of the two species are provided.
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL OUTLINE
The genus Frithia (N.E.Br.) was first mentioned in a
key by Brown (1925). At that time no species were
assigned to the genus and only later was a full descrip-
tion of Frithia pulchra given (Brown 1926). The genus
was named after Frank Frith (1872-1954), a railway ser-
vices gardener stationed at Park Station, Johannesburg.
He was responsible for decorating railway platforms
from 1900 until his retirement in 1932 (Kroon 1997). In
1906, Olive Nation sent a specimen of a plant she dis-
covered near Rustenburg to Brown at Kew for identifi-
cation. The live specimen did not survive the journey, but
the remains were seen by Brown who regarded it as a
distinct entity. After Miss Nation died, a search for more
material proved unsuccessful. Some time later, a Mrs
Dobie of Rustenburg sent plants to Frank Frith, who took
the specimens to Brown at Kew while on a visit to
London, to create the African garden at the Wembley
Exhibition. Dobie’s specimen allowed Brown to finally
describe the genus.
De Boer (1968) published the name Frithia pulchra
var. minor in the Dutch journal Succulenta, but as no
type material was cited the name was invalid. Plants of
this variety are generally smaller than those included in
var. pulchra and are restricted to the eastern parts of the
distribution range of the genus. These differences were
again alluded to by Hardy & Fabian (1992). Zimmer-
mann (1996) confirmed the different characters of var.
minor, but gave no formal description or type validating
the varietal epithet. Although a number of short articles
have been written on Frithia (Brink 1985; Germishuizen
1975; Steffens 1988; Venter 1979, 1983), no in-depth
study has been done on the genus.
This paper reports on the taxonomic status of the
genus, and specimens from the eastern parts of its distri-
bution range are formally described as a new species,
Frithia humilis.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-03-15.
TAXONOMY
To prevent possible confusion with the illegitimate
name Frithia pulchra N.E.Br. var. minor de Boer, the
varietal epithet minor is not used at the specific rank. The
name of the new species is derived from the Latin
humilis, which means ‘smaller than others of its kind’.
Key to species
Window of leaf tips convex with no markings along margins;
leaves 15-25 mm long, blue-green or grey-green; flow-
ers bright magenta with gold, yellow or white centre,
25-35 mm diam.; growing west of Pretoria in the Rus-
tenburg area 1. F. pulchra
Window of leaf tips concave with crenulate markings along
margins; leaves shorter than 15 mm, brown-green or
dull green; flowers white with yellow centre, pale pink,
rarely entirely pink, petals sometimes tipped with pale
pink, 15-20 mm diam., when pollinated turn pale yel-
low or salmon-orange; growing east of Pretoria in the
vicinity of Bronkhorstspruit and Witbank 2. F. humilis
Frithia humilis P.M.Burgoyne, sp. nov.
Frithia pulchra N.E.Br. var. minor de Boer: 147, 148 (1968), nom.
illeg.
Plantae perennes nanae succulentae, radicibus succu-
lentis lateraliter ramosis, tempore mensium hibernium in
humum arenosum retractae per foliis contractilibus lon-
gitudinaliter vietis fiunt praesentia eorundum cavis relic-
tis indicata. Caulis simplex, brevis, ad 10 mm longus.
Folia spiral iter disposita, obscure virides ad brunneo-
virides, mensis aridis hibernis purpureo-suffusa, maxime
succulenta, ad 15 mm longa, cylindrica, idioblastis cera-
ceis distincte serialibus, apicibus foliorum fenestratis
cum centra concavo, maculisque conspicuis crenulatis
perimetro. Flores solitares, 15-20 mm diametro, albi vel
perdilute rosei, centro flavo, ante ad post meridiem ape-
rientes. Sepala 5, inaequalia, folia simulantia, tubum
brevem connata. Petala 20-30, in verticillis plures dis-
posita, apices plerumque acuminati, interdum rotundati.
Staminodia petaloidea ad filiformia, verticillos aliquot
staminum cingentia. Hypanthium basibus connatis
petalorum staminodium staminumque formatum. Necta-
2
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
ria 5, libra, atroviridia, crenulata. Ovarium supra leviter
conicum, stigmata 5 vel 6, perbrevia. Fructus capsula 5-
vel 6-locularis, doliiformis, perfragilis, maturitate
rumpens, semina spargens; valvae ad positionem erec-
tam aperientes, alae valvarum absentes, margines val-
varum recurvati ubi omnis aperti, cristae turgescentes
pallide luteo-brunneae, apicibus divergentibus margin-
ibusque scissis, membranae tegentes ad regulam reduc-
tae. Semina rubro-brunnea, parva, tuberculis parvis tecta.
Florescentia a Decembri ad Februarium.
TYPE. — Gauteng, 2528 (Pretoria): Bronkhorstspruit
Dist., 29 km northeast of Bronkhorstspruit on tarred road
to Verena, then 3 km along road to Susterstroom, on Farm
Susterstroom, in sandy flat areas associated with rough
rocky outcrops, (-BD), Burgoyne 6693 (PRE, holo.).
Perennial, dwarf succulent with fleshy roots branch-
ing laterally; plants retracting into sandy soil by means of
contractile leaves shrinking lengthways during dry win-
ter months, leaving holes marking their presence. Stems
single, short, up to 10 mm long. Leaves arranged spiral-
ly, dull green to brown-green with a purple tinge in dry
winter months, highly succulent, up to 15 mm long,
cylindrical, covered by waxy idioblasts arranged in dis-
tinct rows, tips windowed, with concave centre and con-
spicuous crenulate markings along perimeter. Flowers
single, 15-20 mm diam., white or very pale pink, with
yellow centre, opening during mid-morning to mid-after-
noon. Pollinated flowers turn yellow or salmon-orange.
Sepals 5, unequal, resembling leaves, united to form a
short tube. Petals 20-30 per flower, arranged in several
whorls, tips mostly acuminate, sometimes rounded.
Staminodes petaloid to filiform, surrounding several
whorls of stamens. Hypanthium formed by fused bases
of petals, staminodes and stamens. Nectaries 5, free, dark
green, crenulate. Ovary slightly conical above; stigmas 5
or 6, very short. Fruit a capsule, 5- or 6-locular, barrel-
shaped, very fragile, breaking up when ripe and then dis-
persing seeds; valves opening to an upright position,
valve wings absent, valve margins recurved when fully
open; expanding keels light yellow-brown, parallel, with
diverging tips and torn margins; covering membranes
reduced to a ledge; closing bodies absent. Seeds red-
brown, small, covered by small tubercles. Flowering
time: December-February (summer in the southern
hemisphere).
As the formerly monotypic genus Frithia now has
two species, the type species of the genus is Frithia pul-
chra N.E.Br.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
All specimens held at PRE.
Burgoyne 6692 , 6693, 6694, 6694b, 6696, 6698, 6699 (2), 6699b,
6699c (1).
Crundall PRE5498J (2).
Dyer 4774 ( 1 ). Dyer & Verdoorn 3922 ( 1 ).
Gilfdlan 7272 (2).
Jacobsen 758 (1).
Rose Innes 167 (1).
Van PRE54978 ( 1 ). Venter 2997 (2).
Young 38395 ( 1).
DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT
Frithia is one of the few genera in the Mesem-
bryanthemaceae exclusive to the summer rainfall region
of South Africa. Other mesemb genera with a distinctly
summer rainfall distribution include Neohenricia , Mos-
sia and Khadia, while Delosperma, Hereroa, Lithops,
Chasmatophyllum, Nananthus and Stomatium may occur
in summer rainfall areas but also have wider distribu-
tions.
Previously thought to be a monotypic genus and a
Magaliesberg endemic, an enlarged Frithia still has a
restricted distribution. Populations of these miniature
window plants have been found in two disjunct regions,
in the North-West between Rustenburg and the Harte-
beespoort Dam in the west, and in an area between
Bronkhorstspruit (Gauteng) and Witbank (Mpumalanga)
in the east (Figure 1). The two areas are roughly 150 km
apart, and so far, no specimens of either species have
been collected in the intervening area.
Both species of Frithia grow in very shallow soils
derived from coarse sediments: quartzites of the
Magaliesberg Formation of the Pretoria Group of the
Transvaal Supergroup in the case of Frithia pulchra and
sandstones of the Irrigasie Formation of the Ecca Group
of the Karoo Supergroup for F. humilis. Rocks in both
areas are very rough, porous and weather to form a very
coarse gravel.
Frithia pulchra mostly grows exposed on rock plates,
the roots anchored in cracks between the coarse
quartzites. This substrate reaches very high temperatures
in summer. Plants are also found in coarse gravel and are
not restricted to rocky outcrops. F. humilis grows pre-
dominantly in shallow sand along the rims of large, flat,
rock plates. Temperatures of the substrate are probably
lower as more organic matter is present, insulating the
plant bodies against heat and dessication.
Both species grow at altitudes ranging from 1 368 m
to 1 616 m, and rainfall varies between 700 and 800 mm
per annum. Winters are cold and dry and severe frost
occurs in the areas where the plants grow.
FIGURE 1. — Known distribution of Frithia pulchra ■, and F. humi-
lis, • .
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
3
Other species often associated with both species of
Frithia are the fern ally Selaginella dregei and the
legume Indigofera melanadenia. Species sometimes
found associated with either species of Frithia are the
succulents Anacampseros subnuda subsp. subnuda ,
Crassula lanceolata subsp. transvaalensis,' C. setulosa
var. setulosa and Mossia intervallaris. Monocots like
Microchloa kunthii, Anthericum calyptocarpum together
with an extremely minute and monophyllous species of
Drimia , are also found in these habitats. The habitat of
Frithia pulchra tends to be drier than that of F. humilis,
the soils where the latter grow, having a higher organic
content, sometimes resembling peat, and thus retaining
moisture better.
FRITHIA IN HORTICULTURE
Frithia pulchra and F. humilis differ widely in their
horticultural history. F. humilis was introduced to the
Dutch seed trade by de Boer thirty years ago and a few
of the plants dating from that introduction are still alive.
This species is obviously quite tolerant and it responds to
water more eagerly than does F. pulchra. The latter has
been in continuous cultivation since the late 1920’s but
the plants are usually not long-lived, easily succumbing
to rot. Both species can mature in a few months from
seed under favourable conditions, and in this respect they
are typical of a Delosperma alliance. The two species
readily hybridize (S. Hammer pers. comm.) producing
fertile offspring, with a variety of flower colours includ-
ing orange and bright pink. Many attempts made by
Hammer to hybridize Frithia with other genera ( Delo-
sperma, Drosanthemum , Dorotheanthus, Lithops and
Fenestraria ) have always failed, not even producing the
‘dummy’ (empty) fruits which often result from such dis-
junct liaisons.
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS
Habit
Both species are dwarf perennials with thickened
roots. The stems are much reduced and during periods of
drought the plants retract into the sandy soil. This has
been ascribed to contractile roots, but no such roots are
present in either species. However, in Frithia the cells of
the leaves are arranged in columnar, axial rows and when
moisture is lost and the cells shrink, the tangential walls
contract. Artificially induced dessication using silica gel,
indicated that a leaf may contract to up to one third of its
length (Figure 2B). This causes the plants to retract into
the soil, a mechanism which renders protection to the
plants during times of drought (Figure 3C). Retraction
into the ground is thus achieved by means of ‘contractile
leaves’, not contractile roots.
Roots
Roots of Frithia pulchra differ from those of F.
humilis in being more fibrous, possibly because of the
drier conditions prevailing in its habitat and the strategy
to insulate the plants against the heat of surrounding
rocks in summer.
FIGURE 2. — Frithia pulchra: A, turgid leaf when conditions are
favourable; B, shrunken leaf under drought conditions C,
Neohenricia sibbettii, leaf. A, Burgoyne 6699c ; B, Burgoyne
6694b: C, Burgoyne 6786b. Scale bars: 1 mm.
4
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 3. — Habit of Frithia: A, F. pulchra: B, F. humilis', C, plants
of Frithia humilis retract underground during periods of
drought. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B, 30 mm; C, 10 mm.
Leaves
Borne spirally, the leaves of both species are cylindri-
cal with windowed tips and are covered by an epidermal
layer of waxy idioblasts arranged in distinct rows (Figure
2A). Leaves in adult plants of F. pulchra are longer
(15-25 mm) than in F. humilis (shorter than 15 mm ).
Leaf colour also varies slightly between the two species,
those of F. pulchra having a bluish tinge, whereas those
FIGURE 4. — Surface of leaf tips of Frithia: A, F. pulchra showing
convex tips and no markings; B, F. humilis with concave cen-
tre and crenulate markings on margins. A, Burgoyne 6699c ; B,
Burgoyne 6694b. Scale bars: 1 mm.
of F. humilis are tinged brown or purple. The windowed
tips of the leaves, however, differ conspicuously between
the two species. Windows of F. pulchra are convex when
turgid, slightly concave when flaccid (Figure 4A) and
those of F. humilis are concave even when turgid, with
crenulate markings (Figure 4B) along the margins. These
leaf differences were also noted by Zimmermann (1996).
Flowers
Flowers in both species are borne singly and on very
short stalks or are stalkless. They are subtended by five
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
5
unequal sepals closely resembling the cylindrical leaves.
Flowers of F. pulchra are bright magenta with a white or
light yellow centre and are 25-35 mm in diam. Those of
F. humilis are white with a yellow centre, sometimes
tipped with pale pink, and are generally smaller (15-20
mm diam.). The petals number between 30 and 45 in F.
pulchra and tend to have blunt, rounded tips, whereas
those of F. humilis number between 20 and 30 and usu-
ally have acuminate tips (Figure 3 A, B).
Pollen
Pollen in both species of Frithia is yellow. The grains
are tricolpate and simplicolumellate in F. pulchra (Punt
et al. 1994) with a perforate surface and lumens of dif-
ferent sizes. Pollen in F. humilis has a perforate surface,
and is pluricolumellate, with lumens of more or less
equal size (Figure 5).
Fruit
Fruits are hygrochastic capsules, the shape resem-
bling a barrel. Thick tissue surrounds the capsules of F.
pulchra, whereas that of F. humilis is more fragile
(Figure 6C). However, this character is not constant for
the two species and seems to vary with environmental
conditions. Capsules of both species tend to break up
shortly after ripening. In both species, there are five or
six locules, no valve wings and no closing bodies.
Expanding keels are parallel with divergent tips (Figure
6), and are dark brown in F. pulchra and lighter brown in
F. humilis. Covering membranes are reduced to a ledge
in both cases.
Seeds
From Figure 7 it can be seen that the seed of F. pul-
chra is quite different from that of F. humilis. In F. pul-
chra (Figure 7A) the end where the seed has been
FIGURE 5. — Pollen of Frithia. SEM
micrographs of unacetolyzed
pollen grains: A, F. pulchra\
B, F. humilis. Detail of pol-
len surface: C, F. pulchra', D,
F. humilis. A, C, Burgoyne
6699c\ B, D, Burgoyne 6694b.
Scale bars: A, B, 1 pm; C, D,
0.5 pm.
attached to the funicle (hilar end) has a sharp point,
whereas in F. humilis it is more rounded. The length of
the micropylar regions appears to be similar in the two
species. The surface sculpturing is irregular in both
species of Frithia (Figure 7B, E) and although there are
no microbaculae present, the surface of the epidermal
cells differs markedly between the two species (Figure
7C, F), that of F. pulchra being rough-textured whereas
the cell surface of F. humilis is smoother.
NEAREST RELATIVES
The position of Frithia within the Stomatium Group
proposed by Hartmann (1998) has always been tentative
because of the outlier geographical distribution range
and unique leaf characters displayed by the genus.
Perhaps the most unusual feature is the spirally arranged
leaves, a unique character within the subfamily Ruschi-
oideae Schwantes in Ihlenf., Schwantes & Straka (1962)
emend. Bittrich & H.E.K. Hartmann. Superficially, plants
of Frithia resemble the genus Fenestraria N.E.Br., also
with windowed leaf tips. However, Fenestraria occurs in
northern Namaqualand and Namibia and no other char-
acters are shared by the two genera.
As stated by Hammer (1998), Frithia has characters
in common with Delosperma, but major differences still
separate the two genera. One of the similarities is the leaf
epidermis which is covered by opaque idioblasts.
Idioblasts of Delosperma deilanthoides S. A. Hammer
(1998) most closely resemble those of Frithia and are
also arranged in rows. Capsules in both genera lack cov-
ering membranes and closing bodies. Distributions of
these two genera overlap. The distribution of Delo-
sperma deilanthoides is centred in the Steenkampsberg,
Mpumalanga. It has similar habitat requirements (sandy,
well-drained soil with a high organic content and porous,
6
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 6. — Fruit capsules of Frithia: A, F. pulchrcc, B, F. humilis', C,
closed capsule of F. humilis.', A, Burgoyne 6699c; B, C,
Burgoyne 6694b. Scale bars: 1 mm.
coarse lithology) to those of Frithia, but the Steen-
kampsberg receives a higher rainfall (± 1 200 mm per
annum). Flowers of both genera belong to the white/pink
colour range and open from mid-morning to mid-after-
noon (Smith et al. 1998). However both flower colour
and the presence or absence of epidermal idioblasts are
considered to be pleisiomorphic and are not suitable to
indicate relationships.
The spiral leaf arrangement, not opposite as in other
mesembs, gives rise to the interpretation that Frithia may
have retained this primitive character (spirally arranged
leaves are regarded as primitive) while developing
advanced states in other characters. A more likely expla-
nation may be that the spiral leaf arrangement found in
Frithia is a derived feature, since it is not present- in any
genus holding a more basal position within the Me-
sembryanthemaceae. Based on this data it could be
assumed that Frithia may be considered a highly spe-
cialised ‘Delosperma’ .
The leaves of Neohenricia sibbettii (L. Bolus) L. Bolus
most closely resemble those of Frithia (Figure 2C) in
shape, but the leaf surfaces of these two genera differ
markedly. Leaves of Neohenricia are covered by wart-
like crustose epidermal outgrowths, with opaque
idioblasts scattered among them. Leaves of Neohenricia
are opposite, whereas those of Frithia are arranged spi-
rally. Capsules of the two genera are similar except that
those of Neohenricia have four to six locules (four
locules being the norm) and are shallow; those of Frithia
are five- or six-locular and barrel-shaped. Moreover, the
capsules of Neohenricia are borne on a remarkably thin
pedicel and stand above the mass of leaves, whereas
those of Frithia are buried within the leaves on a short
pedicel and tend to be expelled via leaf pressure when
ripe. However, flower colour and morphology differ con-
siderably. Flowers of Neohenricia are pale yellow, borne
on long pedicels and have thin spiky petals, opening in
the mid-afternoon to evening. Nectaries are in the form
of a glandular ring in Neohenricia, whereas those of
Frithia are free. Flowers of both genera have very short
stigmas with the staminodes and stamens that are fused,
almost forming a hypanthium. The distribution ranges of
these two genera do not overlap.
Further investigation is being done to examine the
relationship (if any) between Conophytum limpidum
S. A. Hammer and Frithia (Burgoyne in prep.) as they
have some characters in common: a hypanthium is pre-
sent; the petals, petaloid staminodes and anthers are
comparable; windowed leaf tips present; fruit capsules
can be compared as closing bodies; covering membranes
are absent. Both are summer rainfall mesembs.
CONSERVATION STATUS
Use of the IUCN red list of categories (IUCN Species
Survival Commision 1994), indicate that both species of
Frithia should be regarded as Vulnerable, as the total
area that they occupy is less than 100 km2. Although the
areas where these species grow are not in any immediate
danger of being destroyed because they are too rocky, the
limited distribution poses the risk that human activity
could wipe out a large part of the populations should
their habitat be used and transformed in the future. One
locality of F. humilis is situated at the edge of an infor-
mal housing development, but the habitat is so unsuitable
for any utilisation by man that it has remained largely
undisturbed except for littering. The conservation status
of F. pulchra is more secure, as a large part of the popu-
lation is situated in the Rustenburg Nature Reserve. All
other areas where populations of both species of Frithia
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
7
FIGURE 7. — Seed of Frithia: SEM micrographs: A-C, F. pulchra, Burgoyne 6699c\ D-F, F. humilis , Burgoyne 6694b. Scale bars: A, D, 100 |im;
B, E, 10 pm; C, F, 1 pm.
grow are in the hands of private land owners, many not
even aware of the presence of these tiny plants.
Unscrupulous succulent collectors may pose the greatest
threat to populations of Frithia. Further population stud-
ies of both species of Frithia will be undertaken and their
new conservation status will be determined (Burgoyne,
Krynauw & Smith in prep.).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mrs A. Romanowski who assisted with the photogra-
phy and Mrs E. du Plessis who helped with the prepara-
tion of the manuscript are gratefully acknowledged. Dr
Otto Leistner is thanked for his assistance with the Latin
description. Ms R Chesselet and Prof. A.E. van Wyk are
thanked for useful discussions.
REFERENCES
BRINK, RD. 1985. Album. Frithia pulchra. Aloe 22: 43.
BROWN, N.E. 1925. Mesembryanthemum. The Gardeners’ Chronicle
ser. 3, 78: 433.
BROWN, N.E. 1926. Ficoidaceae. In J. Burtt Davy, A manual of the
flowering plants and ferns of the Transvaal with Swaziland,
South Africa 1,41: 162. Longmans, Green, London.
BURGOYNE, P.M. (in prep.) Similarities between Frithia pulchra,
Frithia humilis and Conophytum limpidum. Cactus and
Succulent Journal (US).
BURGOYNE, P.M., KRYNAUW, S. & SMITH, G.F. (in prep.) Popu-
lation studies and new conservation status of the genus Frithia
(Mesembryanthemaceae). Proceedings of the XVIth AETFAT
International Congress: special issue, systematics and geogra-
phy of plants.
DE BOER, H.W. 1968. Frithia pulchra var. minor de Boer, var. nov.
Succulenta 47: 147, 148.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1975. Some endangered succulents of the Trans-
vaal. Fauna & Flora 26: 5-7.
HAMMER, S. 1998. Frithia’s fairest friends. Mesemb Study Group
Bulletin 13,3: 64.
HARDY, D. & FABIAN, A. 1992. Succulents of the Tranvaal. Southern
Book Publishers, Halfway House.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998. Groupings in Ruschioideae (Aizoaceae).
Mesemb Study Group Bulletin 2: 35, 36.
IHLENFELDT, HD., SCHWANTES, G. & STRAKA, H. 1962. Die
hoheren Taxa der Mesembryanthemaceae. Taxon 1 1 : 52-56.
IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION. 1994. IUCN Red List
Categories. IUCN, Gland.
KROON, N. 1997. Tribute to two amateurs: William Nelson F.R.H.S.,
L.M.C.A., F.L.Sc. (1852-1922) and Frank Frith (1872-1954).
PlantLife 16: 15-17.
PUNT, W„ BLACKMORE, S„ NILSSON, S. & LE THOMAS, A.
1994. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. L.P.P.
Contributions Series No. 1. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
SMIITH, G.F., CHESSELET, P., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., HART-
MANN, H„ HAMMER, S„ VAN WYK, B-E., BURGOYNE,
P, KLAK, C. & KURZWEIL, H. 1998. Mesembs of the world.
Illustrated guide to a remarkable succulent group. Briza
Publications, Pretoria.
STEFFENS, F.E. 1988. Frithia pulchra. Aloe 25: 71, 72.
VENTER, F. 1979. Frithia pulchra, window plant of the Magaliesberg.
Aloe 17: 47-51.
VENTER, F. 1983. Frithia pulchra. Fauna & Flora 40: 19, 20.
ZIMMERMANN, N.F.A. 1996. Frithia pulchra N.E.Br. — Eine Reise
zu zwei Populationen im Transvaal mit Besprechung der succu-
lenten Begleitvegetation. Kakteen und Andere Sukkulenten 47:
146-152.
Bothalia 30,1 : 9-15 (2000)
A review of generic concepts in the Stilbaceae
J.P. ROURKE*
Keywords: Eurylobium Hochst., generic review, Kogelbergia Rourke, new combinations, new genus, Retzia Thunb., Stilbaceae
ABSTRACT
The generic concepts in the Cape endemic family Stilbaceae (± 14 species), are reviewed. Proposals by various authors
to include Retzia capensis Thunb. in the Stilbaceae are supported. Xeroplana Briq and Eurylobium Hochst. are shown to
be congeneric with Stilbe L., resulting in one new combination and one new name in Stilbe. Seven currently recognised
species of Stilbe are enumerated. A key to the genera of the Stilbaceae, as presently understood, is provided. A new genus
Kogelbergia is described to accommodate two species previously assigned to Stilbe sect. Amphistilbe and two new combi-
nations in Kogelbergia are proposed.
CONTENTS
Introduction 9
Inclusion of Retzia in the Stilbaceae 9
Stilbaceae subfamily Stilboideae 9
Current generic position 10
Synopsis of Stilbe 11
Key to genera of Stilbaceae 11
Kogelbergia, a new genus in the Stilbaceae 11
Acknowledgements 15
References 15
INTRODUCTION
The Stilbaceae Kunth, a small family in the Lamiales, is
endemic to the southern Western Cape. It is variously
regarded as a subfamily within the Verbenaceae by some
authors (Cronquist 1981) or as a family by others (Dyer
1975; Dahlgren 1980). The entire family consists of about
twelve currently recognised species arranged in six genera.
Four of these ( Eurylobium Hochst., Campylostachys
Kunth, Euthystachys A. DC. and Thesmophora Rourke)
are monotypic. While Campylostachys and Thesmophora
are defined on sound morphological characters, Eurylo-
bium and Xeroplana Briq. (two species) are here consid-
ered to be congeneric with Stilbe L. On present evidence
Euthystachys seems sufficiently distinct to be upheld as
a monotypic genus but further studies of fresh material
from a range of populations are required before an ade-
quate assessment can be made. Over and above these
genera there is material of at least one and possibly two
further undescribed taxa represented in local herbaria so
it is unlikely that the final species count for the family
will exceed fourteen.
INCLUSION OF RETZIA IN THE STILBACEAE
Before discussing these generic concepts any further,
the position of Retzia Thunb. must also be considered in
any review of the Stilbaceae and its relationships.
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1999-05-26.
Retzia capensis Thunb., a monospecific endemic Cape
genus, has been assigned to a wide range of families
since it was described by Thunberg in 1776 (see Dahl-
gren et al. 1979, for a detailed review of its past taxonomic
history). It has also been treated as a monospecific fami-
ly (Dyer 1975). Similarly, Cronquist (1981) upheld the
Retziaceae as a monospecific family, dismissing any
relationship with the Stilbaceae largely on account of the
placentation and ‘organisation of the gynoecium’ in
Retzia. In a similar view, Takhtajan (1997), while
acknowledging that Stilbaceae and Retziaceae are close-
ly related, continued to uphold both as separate families.
However, modern data from several different sources
now indicate conclusively that Retzia is most closely
allied to the Stilbaceae.
In a comparative study of iridoid glucosides in Stilbe
ericoides L. and Retzia capensis , biogenetically similar
compounds were found in both species (Dahlgren et al.
1979). These authors further pointed out that morpho-
logical and anatomical evidence also suggested a close
relationship between the two families. An extensive
investigation of the wood anatomy of several genera in
the Stilbaceae has further highlighted the similarities
between Retzia and the Stilbaceae (Carlquist 1986).
More recently, rbcL sequences for Euthystachys
(Stilbaceae) and Retzia were found to be very similar,
‘differing by only eight substitutions’, (Bremer et al.
1994), again confirming the close relationship between
the two families. Thus morphological, anatomical, phy-
tochemical and molecular evidence supports the inclu-
sion of Retzia in the Stilbaceae.
In an updated phylogenetic classification of the flow-
ering plants, Thorne (1992) incorporated Retzia into the
Stilbaceae, dividing the Stilbaceae in two subfamilies,
Retzioideae and Stilboideae. This view is followed in the
present treatment and is, similarly, the current opinion of
the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998).
STILBACEAE SUBFAMILY STILBOIDEAE
All members of the the Stilbaceae subfamily Stil-
boideae are small, inconspicuous ericoid shrublets with
very small white or pinkish flowers. Although typical
components of the Cape fynbos they are never dominant
10
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
and tend to be easily overlooked. Several taxa are rare
localised endemics, and some are possibly palaeoen-
demics. In almost all cases the flowers are extremely
small (shorter than 10 mm) which has made the dissect-
ing and interpretation of herbarium material very diffi-
cult, often leading to serious misinterpretations of the flo-
ral structures (Rourke 1977). During the course of revis-
ing the family I have been able to examine a wide range
of fresh living material collected in the field which has
greatly clarified an understanding of the floral structures.
This review of the generic characters within the fami-
ly has led to an expanded concept of Stilbe which will be
discussed here and also the exclusion from Stilbe of two
species previously known as Stilbe mucronata N.E.Br.
[more recently as Stilbe verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.)
Moldenke] and Stilbe phylicoides A. DC. It is proposed
that they be placed in a new genus, Kogelbergia Rourke.
As presently understood the Stilbaceae subfamily
Stilboideae consists of five genera, two of which are char-
acterised by having four-lobed corollas ( Campylostachys
and Thesmophora) and three which have five-lobed
corollas ( Stilbe , Euthystachys and Kogelbergia).
CURRENT GENERIC POSITION
The problem of finding a rational generic classifica-
tion of the Stilbaceae has been known for some time
(Dyer 1975; Rourke 1977). In this review an interim
solution is provided to satisfy the immediate needs of
two generic treatments of the family for ‘ Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera ’ and K. Kubitski’s
'The families and genera of vascular plants' , currently in
progress. A major taxonomic difficulty concerns the pre-
sent circumscription of Stilbe, Xeroplana, Eurylobium
and Euthystachys.
Stilbe L.
Two distinct groups can be recognised within Stilbe
based on the symmetry of the corolla and the presence or
absence of pubescence on the corolla lobes.
Stilbe verticillata and S. phylicoides A.DC. have actino-
morphic corollas and densely pubescent corolla lobes of
equal size [Stilbe sect. Amphistilbe (Pearson 1901)]. The
ovary in both species is single-chambered (but has mar-
ginal septum remnants), with two basal ovules.
The remaining species are characterised by promi-
nently bilabiate flowers with two broad, erect posterior
corolla lobes and three narrow anteriorly deflected corol-
la lobes, all of which are quite glabrous [Stilbe sect.
Eustilbe (Pearson 1901)]. The sepals are fused to form a
tubular, usually glabrous calyx. The ovary is two-cham-
bered with a single ovule in each chamber. At anthesis
one of the ovules and its locule aborts, leaving a single
ovule in a single chamber.
It is proposed that the present broad circumscription
of Stilbe be emended to encompass merely Stilbe sect.
Eustilbe and that the two species currently placed in
FIGURE 1 — Diagramatic representation of the differences in corolla
structure and pubescence between A, Stilbe and B, Kogel-
bergia.
Stilbe sect. Amphistilbe be removed to a new genus,
herein described as Kogelbergia (Figure 1).
Xeroplana Briq.
In Xeroplana the corolla is strongly bilabiate with two
broad, erect posterior petals, and three narrow anterior
petals. The corolla lobes are glabrous. Initially the ovary
is two-chambered with a single ovule in each chamber,
but the abaxial chamber and ovule soon abort, leaving a
single adaxial chamber with a solitary basal ovule. These
similarities with Stilbe sect. Eustilbe have already been
noted; moreover, it has previously been pointed out that
the generic status of Xeroplana is questionable (Rourke
1977). On the basis of gross morphological evidence
Xeroplana and Stilbe sect. Eustilbe are congeneric.
Consequently, as no rational justification can be found to
uphold Xeroplana, it is proposed that it be merged with
Stilbe sect. Eustilbe under a modified concept of Stilbe,
after having removed the two species in Stilbe sect.
Amphistilbe to a new genus, Kogelbergia.
Eurylobium Hochst.
Vegetative and florql characters in Eurylobium are the
same as in Stilbe sect. Eustilbe, namely, a tubular corol-
la, strongly bilabiate with two large, erect posterior lobes
and three narrower, anteriorly deflected lobes. The corol-
la lobes are glabrous. The sepals are fused for 3/4 of their
length to form a glabrous, actinomorphic calyx tube.
Initially the ovary is bilocular with an ovule in each
chamber but at an early stage one of the ovules aborts,
leaving the ovary to become unilocular with a single,
functional, basally attached ovule. As these characters
are the same as in Stilbe sect. Eustilbe, there is no justi-
fication for upholding Eurylobium as a monotypic genus.
Euthystachys A.DC.
The single species in this monotypic genus, E. abbre-
viata A.DC. is distinguished by the following characters:
soft, pubescent sepals fused for about ‘A of their length
at the base; an actinomorphic corolla of five, glabrous,
equal corolla lobes and a bilocular ovary with a single
functional ovule in each chamber.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
11
These characters, though slender, provide sufficient
justification for maintaining Euthystachys as a mono-
typic genus at this stage. Nevertheless, there are some
differences in the degree of fusion of the sepals in certain
collections. Further field work and the study of a range
of fresh material is required before the generic status of
Euthystachys can be adequately assessed.
Under the revised generic concept of Stilbe discussed
above, two genera in the family, Xeroplana Briq. and
Eurylobium Hochst. fall clearly within the emended cir-
cumscription of Stilbe and must be reduced to synonymy
as indicated below.
SYNOPSIS OF STILBE
Stilbe P.J.Bergius, Descriptiones plantarum ex Capite
Bonae Spei: 30, t. 4 (1767); H. Pearson: 183 (1901).
Type: Stilbe vestita P.J.Bergius.
Eurylobium Hochst.: 228 (1842); Walp.: 173 (1845); A.DC.: 608
(1848); H. Pearson: 187 (1901). Type: Eurylobium serrulatum Hochst.
Xeroplana Briq.: 336 (1896); H. Pearson: 188 (1901); Rourke: 1
(1977). Type: Xeroplana zeyheri Briq.
Ericoid shrublets, 0.5-1. 5 m tall, with a single main
stem, occasionally multistemmed and lignotuberous.
Leaves ericoid, linear-subulate to narrowly lanceolate,
ascending, in whorls of 3-5, margins revolute. Inflores-
cence a dense sessile spike, 10-40 mm long. Flowers
white or pink, sessile, subtended by single anterior bract.
Floral bracts 2, opposite, foliaceous. Calyx tubular, usu-
ally hard, with 5 free lobes occasionally slightly abaxial-
ly curved. Corolla tubular, 5-merous, bilabiate with two
erect glabrous posterior lobes and three narrower
glabrous anterior lobes; interior of throat ringed with
dense pubescence, only rarely glabrous. Stamens 4,
equal, posterior stamen absent; filaments glabrous, fili-
form; anthers basifixed. Ovary oblong, laterally com-
pressed, potentially two-chambered but abaxial chamber
abortive; adaxial chamber with a single basally attached
ovule; style filiform glabrous, slightly adaxially curved;
apex occasionally minutely bilobed. Fruit cylindric, lat-
erally compressed, brown, shiny, dehiscing into 2 valves
at apex. Seeds ovoid, straw-coloured.
An enumeration of the species of Stilbe currently
recognised within the new delimitation of the genus is
given here.
1. Stilbe vestita P.J.Bergius , Descriptiones plan-
tarum ex Capite Bonae Spei: 30, t. 4 fig. 6 (1767).
2. Stilbe ericoides L., Mantissa plantarum altera:
305 (1771).
3. Stilbe albiflora E.Mey., Commentariorum de
plantis Africae australioris 1: 279 (1836).
4. Stilbe rupestris Compton in Journal of South
African Botany 10: 127, 128 (1944).
5. Stilbe serrulata (Hochst.) Rourke, comb. nov.
Eurylobium serrulatum Hochst. in Nora 15: 229 (1842). Type: ‘Inter
rapes cacuminis montis prope Genadenthal in Colonia Capensis’ Dec.
1838, Krauss 1110. TUB6019 (TUB, holo.!).
6. Stilbe overbergensis Rourke , nom. nov.
Xeroplana zeyheri Briq. in Bulletin de l’Herbier Boissier, Ser. 1,4:
336 (1896). Type: Western Cape, on banks of Riviersonderend River at
Appelskraal and on adjacent mountains Ecklon & Zeyher sub Stilbe sp.
nov. no. 8 in herb. Delesserl (G, holo.!).
The epithet zeyheri cannot be used due to the prior
existence of Stilbe zeyheri Gand. (1913), a synonym of
Stilbe albiflora E.Mey.
7. Stilbe gymnopharyngia ( Rourke ) Rourke, comb.
nov.
Xeroplana gymnopharyngia Rourke in Journal of South African Botany
43: 6 (1977). Type: Western Cape, Langeberg Mountains, Riversdale
above the Farm Langkloof on ‘Annex Langekloof’, along summit ridge.
Rourke 1451 (NBG, holo.!, PRE, BOL, K, MO, G, S, iso.!).
Key to genera of Stilbaceae
la Corolla tube 45-55 mm long, pubescent externally, orange-
red with black tips (subfamily Retziaceae) Retzia
lb Corolla tube shorter than 12 mm, glabrous externally, uni-
formly mauve, pink or white (subfamily Stilboideae):
2a Corolla 4-lobed:
3a Sepals free; corolla lobes glabrous Campylostachys
3b Sepals fused forming tube; corolla lobes pubescent . . .
Thesmophora
2b Corolla 5-lobed:
4a Corolla actinomorphic; lobes equal or almost equal:
5a Corolla lobes pubescent Kogelbergia
5b Corolla lobes glabrous Euthystachys
4b Corolla prominently bilabiate with two larger erect poste-
rior petals and three narrow anterior petals Stilbe
KOGELBERGIA , A NEW GENUS IN THE STILBACEAE
As previously mentioned, it is proposed that the two
species in Stilbe sect. Amphistilbe be removed to a new
genus, Kogelbergia. Its distinguishing characters are dis-
cussed here.
Inflorescence structure
Superficially the inflorescence appears to be a sessile,
globose capitulum. Elowever, careful dissection of
K. verticillata indicates that it is paniculate in structure
with several highly condensed axillary branches bearing
3 or 4 flowers. The inflorescence structure in all other
Stilbaceae subfamily Stilboideae is spicate. It seems
probable that although much reduced and condensed, the
paniculate inflorescence of K. verticillata represents a
less specialised condition than the racemose pattern in
the rest of the Stilbaceae. In K. phylicoides the inflores-
cence is a condensed spike with no trace of a paniculate
structure.
Corolla
Although the corolla is actinomorphic at anthesis con-
sisting of 5 equal, linear corolla lobes, as the corolla
opens, two lobes briefly assume an erect (posterior) posi-
tion with the remaining three assuming a patent (anteri-
or) position. This condition can only be briefly detected
by observing developmental stages in living material and
12
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
is soon lost as the flower matures. It seems probable that
actinomorphy in the corolla is a plesiomorphic condition
with bilateral symmetry and a bilabiate corolla repre-
senting the derived condition.
The presence of dense villous pubescence on the lin-
ear corolla lobes of Kogelbergia is a character highly
unusual in the family. All other Stilbaceae except
Thesmophora and Retzia, have completely glabrous
corolla lobes. This pubescence is formed by the presence
of 1-2 mm long white trichomes on the inner surface,
apex, and outer surface of each corolla lobe. Like almost
all other Stilbaceae, Kogelbergia has a distinctive ring of
pubescence in the throat of the corolla. Only three other
species in the entire family lack this feature. The dense
pubescence on the apices of the corolla lobes appears to
be unrelated to the throat pubescence and is regarded
here as a completely new character.
Ovary
Typically the ovary in Stilbaceae subfamily
Stilboideae is bilocular with a single ovule in each cham-
ber, or initially bilocular but with one abortive ovule in
an atrophied or abortive second locule leaving a single
functional ovule to develop. In Kogelbergia the ovary is
unilocular with two basal ovules. However, serial sec-
tioning of the ovary shows clear remnants of a septum in
the position where this would normally be expected to be
(i.e. at right angles to the axis). The septum breaks down
very early in the development of the ovary leaving a
unilocular condition which is clearly derived (Figure 2).
Pollen
A review of pollen structure in the Stilbaceae (exclud-
ing Retzia) showed that the pollen of the ‘Stilbe
mucronata type’ was quite distinct within the family (Raj
FIGURE 2. — Kogelbergia verticillata', cross section through base of
ovary showing single chambered ovary with two ovules, x 77.
Note remnant of ovary septum placed at right angles to inflor-
escence axis. Two anterior sepals at base of calyx tube slightly
larger than posterior sepals.
TABLE 1 . — Summary of major morphological differences between
Stilbe and Kogelbergia
1983). Instead of having a rugulose exine (as in Cam-
pylostachys) or tectate-perforate exine as in the remain-
ing species in the family, the exine of Kogelbergia (the
‘ Stilbe mucronata type’) has a striato-reticulate exine, set-
ting it apart from all its congeners (Raj 1983).
Conclusion
Fundamental morphological differences exist be-
tween the two species previously known as Stilbe verti-
cillata and Stilbe phylicoides and other members of the
genus Stilbe (Table 1). These are considered sufficient to
justify separate generic status. Accordingly, a new genus
Kogelbergia is described to accommodate these species.
Part of the distribution area of one of these species falls
within the Kogelberg Nature Reserve, one of the centres
of the highest endemism in the Cape Floristic Kingdom.
Kogelbergia Rourke, genus novum Stilbei affine,
a quo corolla actinomorpha 5 petalis aequalibus lobis
dense pubescentibus, et ovario uniloculari ovulis duobus
basilaribus, differt. Typus: Kogelbergia verticillata
(Eckl. & Zeyh.) Rourke.
The genus Kogelbergia is distinguished from all other
genera by its dense, globose, sometimes inconspicuously
branched (apparently paniculate) or spicate inflores-
cences, the actinomorphic corolla, 5 equal petals densely
pubescent at their apices, and the single-chambered ovary
with 2 basal ovules. Two species are currently recog-
nised.
Kogelbergia verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Rourke ,
comb. nov.
Trichocephalus verticillatus Eckl. & Zeyh., Enumeratio plantarum
africae australis 131 (1835). Stilbe verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.)
Moldenke: 474 (1948). Type: in lateralibus montium prope
Palmietrivier, supra Grietjiesgat, June, Alt. 4, Ecklon & Zeyher 1003
(SAM, iso.!).
Stilbe mucronata N.E.Br.: t 2526 (1897); H.Pearson: 184 (1901).
Type: in declivibus montium Houwhoek, April 1895, 1400 ped., Bolus
8409 (K, lecto.! here designated).
Stilbe mucronata N.E.Br. var. cuspidata H.Pearson: 184 (1901). S.
verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Moldenke var. cuspidata (H.Pearson)
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
13
Moldenke: 474 (1948). Type: Zwartberg, Caledon, Dec., Bolus s.n. (K,
holo.!).
Stilbe chorisepala Suess.: 56 (1950). Type: Franschhoek Pass, 17-
11-1946, S. Rehm in herb. W. Giess 1377 (M, holo.!).
Small, rigid, well-branched shrublet up to 1 m high
with a single main trunk up to 50 mm diam. Flowering
branches 2-3 mm diam., densely lanate initially, later
becoming glabrous. Leaves in whorls of 5, patent to slight-
ly recurved, ericoid, narrowly lanceolate, 10-12 x 2 mm,
apices prominently mucronate, upper surface glabrous
when mature, under surface lanate, margins recurved.
Inflorescence a sessile, globose, much condensed panicle
15-22 mm diam; lateral axes much condensed, bearing 3
or 4 flowers; each flower subtended by a lanceolate-
acute, apically mucronate bract and two opposite floral
bracts. Floral bracts very narrowly oblanceolate,
glabrous basally but lanately crinite apically. Calyx
actinomorphic, tubular, 5 mm long, of 5 equal lobes (but
anterior sepals slightly thicker at base), fused into a
glabrous tube for lU of their length; free lobes very nar-
rowly oblanceolate, glabrous basally but lanately crinite
apically. Corolla 8-10 mm long, funnel-form, tubular,
tube region glabrous, hyaline, actinomorphic but the 2
posterior petals erect, three anterior petals patent at
anthesis; throat fringed with a dense ring of lanate pubes-
cence; lobes at anthesis linear-acuminate, densely
tomentose. Stamens 4, prominently exserted, 5 mm long,
inserted between corolla lobes; posterior stamen absent;
anthers versatile, dorsifixed, saggitate. Ovary ellipsoid,
purple in upper half, bilaterally flattened, single-cham-
bered with 2 basal ovules in chamber; style straight,
terete, 6-7 mm long. Seed cylindric-ovoid, 2 mm long,
surface colliculate, tending to tuberculate basally, pale
straw-coloured (Figure 3).
Distribution, habitat and biology
This species ranges in an arc from French Hoek Pass
southwards through the Hottentots Holland Mountains to
Kogelberg; thence eastwards to the Caledon Swartberg
and Genadendal in the Riviersonderend range. Outlying
populations occur in the mountains near Napier and Elim
with an isolated collection made on the Potteberg.
Kogelbergia is essentially a montane species occurring
mainly above 450 m, but may range from 250-1 150 m.
It generally favours moist south-facing habitats and is
often found in peaty soil overlying Table Mountain
Sandstone. Flowering time: May-November. Seeds are
shed in January (Figure 4).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Jonkershoek, east of top
of zig-zag path above 2nd waterfall, (-DD), Jan., Rycroft 146 (PRE).
3319 (Worcester): Franschhoek Pass, (-CC), Nov., Rehm in herb.
W. Giess 1377 (M). 3418 (Simonstown): east of Kogelberg at summit
of peak at north end of Five Beacon Ridge, (-BB), June, Rourke 479
(NBG, PRE); mountains of Sir Lowry’s Pass, March, Burchell 8821 (K,
PRE); southeast slopes of Moordenaarskop, (-BD), July, Boucher 3056,
April, Boucher 1242 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Dwarsberg, Hottentots
Holland Mountains, (-AA), Jan., Rourke 1844 (NBG, PRE); Kathleen
Murray Nature Reserve, Nuweberg Forest Reserve, June, Rourke 1968
(NBG); top of ridge east of Viljoen’s Pass, June, Goldblatt 2049
(NBG); Houwhoek, April, Schlechter 7574 (K, PRE, SAM); in lateral-
ibus montium prope Palmietrivier supra Grietjiesgat, June, Ecklon &
Zeyher 1003 (SAM); Hottentots Holland Mts, July, Ecklon &
Zeyher 2215 (SAM); Lebanon Catchment, Grabouw, June, Kruger 76
(PRE); Swartberg, Caledon, (-AB), Oct., Bodkin in herb Bolus 6785
(NBG; PRE), Bolus s.n. (K); Highlands, (-AC), Aug., Compton 7348
(NBG); Genadendal, (-BA), Dec., Bodkin in herb. Guthrie 3623 (NBG);
Boskloof Farm, eastern ridges of Paardeberg, (-BC), Dec., Rourke 2053
(NBG); Groot Hagel Kraal, Haelkraal River area, NE of farmstead,
(-DA), April, Oliver 5884 (NBG); Elim, (-DB), April, Schlechter 7636
(K, PRE, NBG). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Potteberg, Albertsdal Farm,
(-BC), May, Compton 19526 (NBG).
Kogelbergia phylicoides (A. DC.) Rourke, comb.
nov.
Stilbe phylicoides A. DC., Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis 12: 606 (1848); H. Pearson: 183 (1901). Type: Voormans-
bosch near Swellendam (sub loc. no. 70), Zeyher 3589 in herb. Boiss.
(G, holo.; K!, SAM!).
Campylostachys phylicoides Sond.: 202 (1847), nom. nud.
Small, upright, multiple-stemmed, lignotuberous
shrublet, 0.5- 1.0 m tall. Flowering branches sparsely
sericeous initially, soon glabrous, 1-3 mm diam.; lower
branches covered in prominent leaf scars. Leaves in
pseudowhorls of 5-7, patent to slightly incurved, ericoid,
very narrowly lanceolate-linear, 5-12 x 1 mm, glabrous,
apices curved upwards, strongly mucronate. Inflores-
cence a sessile, globose to ovoid terminal spike, 20-25 x
15 mm, usually solitary, occasionally with up to 3 axil-
lary spikes clustered below; each flower subtended by a
lanceolate-cymbiform bract, sericeous proximally, apex
glabrous, mucronate. Floral bracts 2, narrowly lanceo-
late-acuminate, 5-7 x 1 mm, sparsely sericeous, hyaline.
Flowers sessile. Calyx with 5 sepals; sepals free, nar-
rowly lanceolate, 6-7 x 1 mm, hyaline to papyraceous,
upper half sericeous, apices prominently rostrate; poste-
rior sepal smaller than remainder. Corolla actinomor-
phic, 8-10 mm long; lobes narrowly lanceolate-acumi-
nate, patent, densely pubescent mainly on inner surface,
2-3 mm long; tube glabrous 4-5 mm long; throat fringed
with dense ring of pubescence. Stamens 4, exserted,
5-6 mm long, inserted between corolla lobes; posterior
stamen absent; anthers versatile, dorsifixed, saggitate.
Ovary 1 mm long, ovoid, bilaterally flattened, single-
chambered with two basal, erect ovules; style straight,
terete, 6 mm long. Seeds not seen.
Distribution, habitat and biology
Endemic to the Langeberg Range in the southern
Western Cape, Kogelbergia phylicoides occurs sporadi-
cally on the upper south slopes in mesic mountain fynbos
between the Clock Peaks at Swellendam and the Robin-
son Pass near Mossel Bay (Figure 4). Populations are
mostly small, usually consisting of less than 12 individ-
uals, and are generally found at elevations between 425
and 1 100 m. Flowering time: October and November.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): first path below 10 O’clock
Peak, Swellendam, (-CD), Oct., Wurts 445 (NBG); Langeberg,
Swellendam, south slope of 12 O’clock Peak, Oct., Taylor 7203 (NBG,
K); Voormansbosch, (-DC), Oct., Zeyher 3589 (K, SAM); Zuurbraak
Peak, Oct., Barnard SAM37286 (SAM). 3321 (Ladismith): Garcia’s
Pass, Riversdale, (-CC), Oct., Thorne SAM38850: Garcia’s Pass, Oct.,
14
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 3. — Kogelberf’ia verticillata, Raurke 1968. A, flowering shoot; B, mature seed, C, open flower and subtending bract; D, bract, abaxial
view; E, bract, adaxial view; F, corolla, opened; G, calyx and two floral bracts; H, leaf, adaxial view, 1, leaf, abaxial view, J, K, anthers
before dehiscence; L, anther after dehiscence; M, longitudinal section through ovary; N, gynoecium. Scale bars: A, 50 mm; B, J-L, 2 mm;
C-G, 10 mm; H, I, M, N, 5 mm.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
15
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Kogel-
bergia verticillata , •; and
Kogelbergia phylicoides , A.
Galpin 4420 (K, PRE); summit of Kampscheberg, Riversdale, 9-12-
1814, Burchell 7127 (K, PRE); lower part of Kampscheberg, 1-12-
1814, Burchell 6937 (K); Langeberg Mountains, Riversdale, above
Farm Langkloof on ‘Annex Langekloof , Nov., Rourke 1446 (NBG).
3322 (Oudtshoom): Robinson’s Pass, Outeniqua’s, (-CC), Oct., Bond
7567 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am most grateful to the late Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst
for preparing the drawing of Kogelbergia verticillata and
to Inge Oliver for the diagram in Figure 1.
REFERENCES
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG). 1998. An ordinal
classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
BERGIUS, P.J. 1767. Descriptiones plantarum ex Capite Bonae Spei.
Laurent Salvii, Stockholm.
BREMER, B , OLMSTEAD, R.G., STRUWE, L„ & SWEERE, J.A.,
1 994. rbcL sequences support exclusion of Retzia, Desfontainia
and Nicodemia from the Gentianales. Plant Systematics and
Evolution 190: 213-230.
BRIQUET, J. 1896. Xeroplana zeyheri. Bulletin de VHerbier Boissier,
Ser. 1, 4: 336.
BROWN, N.E. 1897. Stilbe mucronata. Hooker’s leones plantarum 6:
t. 2526.
CARLQUIST, S. 1986. Wood anatomy of Stilbaceae and Retzliaceae:
ecological and systematic implications. Aliso 11: 299-316.
COMPTON, R.H. 1944. Stilbe rupestris. Journal of South African
Botany 10: 127, 128.
CRONQUIST, A. 198 1 . An integrated system of classification of flow-
ering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
DAHLGREN, R. 1980. A revised classification of the Angiosperms.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91-124.
DAHLGREN, R., NIELSEN, B.J., GOLDBLATT, P. & ROURKE, J.P.
1979. Further notes on Retziaceae: its chemical contents and
affinities. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66:
545-556.
DE CANDOLLE, A. 1848. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni veg-
etabilis. Masson, Paris.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants 1 :
514-516. Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
ECKLON, C.F. & ZEYHER, K.L.P. 1835. Enumeratio plantarum
africae australis. Perthes & Besser, Hamburg.
GANDOGER, M. 1913. Manipulus plantarum novarum praecipue ame-
ricae australis. Bulletin de la Societe botanique de France 60: 25.
HOCHSTETTER, C.F. 1842. Nova genera plantarum africae turn aus-
tralis turn tropicae borealis. Flora 15: 228, 229.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum altera. Laurent Salvii,
Stockholm.
MEYER, E.H.F. 1836. Commentariorum de plantis Africae australioris
1 : 279. Voss, Leipzig.
MOLDENKE, H.N. 1948. Notes on new and noteworthy plants. V.
Phytologia 2: 474.
PEARSON, H.H.W. 1901. Verbenaceae. Flora capensis 5,1: 183-188.
Reeve, London.
RAJ, B. 1993. A contribution to the pollen morphology of Stilbaceae
Kunth. Pollen et spores 25: 395-408.
ROURKE, J.P. 1977. A revision of Xeroplana Briq. (Stilbaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 43: 1-8.
SONDER, O. 1847. Vergleichungen der von Ecklon und Zeyher und
von Drege gesammelten sudafrikanischen Pflanzen, mit den
Exemplaren von Zeyher’s neuesten Sammlungen, welche der-
selbe zum Verkauf stellt durch J.F. Drege in Borstel bei
Hamburg. Linnaea 20: 202.
SUESSENGUTH, K. 1950. Stilbe chorisepala. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen, Heft 2: 56.
TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering
plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
THORNE, R.F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the
flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365—389.
WALPERS, W.G. 1845. Repertorium botanices systematicae 4: 173.
Hofmeister, Leipzig.
Bothalia 30,1 : 17-24(2000)
Studies in the Sphaerocarpales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2.
The genus Sphaerocarpos and its only local species, S. stipitatus
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Austrosphaerocarpos (subgenus), Hepaticae, Monocarpineae, Riellineae, southern Africa, Sphaerocarpaceae, Sphaerocarpales, Sphae-
rocarpineae, Sphaerocarpos stipitatus
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus Sphaerocarpos, subgenus Austrosphaerocarpos, and its only local species, S. stipi-
tatus Bisch. ex Lindenb., is presented here. These taxa are classified in the suborder Sphaerocarpineae of the order
Sphaerocarpales, for which short notes and a key to all three constituent suborders, Monocarpineae, Riellineae and
Sphaerocarpineae, are provided.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Sphaerocarpos (Micheli) Boehmer was
first recorded from southern Africa by Proskauer (1954).
He received material from the algologist, Dr M.A.
Pocock, who had collected it in the Eastern Cape, on the
banks of pools in the Palmiet River, a tributary of the
New Years River, seven miles from Grahamstown, on the
Cradock Road. Miss Lilian Britten, a lecturer at Rhodes
University College, had originally discovered Sphaero-
carpos plants at this locality. A further collection from
Clanwilliam, by Prof. E.A.C.L.E. Schelpe, was also
recorded by Proskauer.
Amell (1963) did not report any new collections and the
only recent published South African record of the species
is by Long (1993) from a 1969 collection, H.R. Toelken
1978 (BM, BOL) from Paardeneiland, Cape Town.
Seven of the collections that I studied, have not been
reported in the literature before. Despite repeated visits
to the Northern, Western and Eastern Cape by various
collectors, myself included, such a small number of gath-
erings must surely reflect the rarity of these plants,
although Proskauer (1955) remarked that, ‘one does not
normally find members of the group in the field without
being familiar with them’. Their truncated life cycle,
from spore to spore, can take less than 45 days (Schuster
1992) , and dramatically reduces the time period during
which they are likely to be found.
It is, nonetheless, hoped that the present, fully illus-
trated paper, will familiarise more botanists with these
remarkable plants and that, in future, they will collect
them, thus enabling us to establish the local distribution
range more completely. Previously, it was thought that S.
stipitatus was restricted to the southern hemisphere, i.e.
Chile in South America (where the type specimen had
been collected by Bertero in 1829) and South Africa.
Recently, however, it was also collected as a presumed
adventive in Portugal (Sergio & Sim-Sim 1989), as well
as at a remote, high altitude locality in East Nepal (Long
1993) , where its accidental introduction is unlikely.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-07-02.
This paper on Sphaerocarpos stipitatus, is the second
in a series of three on the Sphaerocarpales in southern
Africa.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The same procedures as outlined in Perold (1999b)
were employed in the preparation of the material for
examination and photography by compound light micro-
scope and scanning electron microscope.
Order Sphaerocarpales Cavers in New Phyto-
logist 9: 81 (1910); Grolle: 55 (1983); Scott: 63 (1985).
[excluding the American Geothallus Campbell and the
Mesozoic fossil, Naiadita Brodie]
Plants ephemeral, very diverse, terrestrial; sometimes
minute, subspherical and pouch-like, occasionally with
branched ventral sprouts (Monocarpineae), or somewhat
larger, with prostrate, median stems, up to 4 (or more)
cell layers thick, pseudodichotomously branching, with
wings 2-ranked, lateral, incised, leafy, unistratose
(Sphaerocarpineae); otherwise aquatic, semifrondose,
stems ± erect, apical dominance seemingly persistent,
with broad, undulating wing on dorsal side, small leaf
scales at both sides and ventrally (Riellineae). Air cham-
bers and air pores (the latter in the carpocephalum wall)
present only in Monocarpineae. Cells all thin-walled,
large, delicate; smaller oil cells found only in Riellineae.
Rhizoids all smooth.
Asexual reproduction by gemmae, only in Riellineae.
Monoicous in Monocarpineae and rarely in Riella
species, otherwise dioicous, mostly heterothallic, with male
plants much or somewhat smaller. Antheridia ovoid to glo-
bose, in Monocarpineae located inside air chambers, pedi-
cel long, uniseriate; in Sphaerocarpineae individually sur-
rounded by involucres, crowded together on dorsal surface
of stems; in Riellineae enclosed in pockets along margin of
undulating wing, pedicel short, uniseriate. Archegonia with
6 rows of neck cells, in Monocarpineae borne on archego-
niophores, otherwise individually surrounded by large,
flask-shaped or pyriform involucres, dorsally on, or along
stems of female plants. Stalk variable in length, without rhi-
18
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
zoid furrow. Capsule globose, cleistocarpous, wall unis-
tratose, cell walls delicate, in Monocarpineae only with
small, nodular to elongated thickenings, in other suborders
thickenings absent. Seta very short, becoming necrotic.
Spores medium-sized to very large, 40-140 pm diam., sin-
gle in Monocarpineae and Riellineae, mostly remaining in
tetrads in Sphaerocarpineae. Elaters absent. Nutritive cells
present in Sphaerocarpineae and Riellineae. Spore release
in all three suborders by dissolution or decay of capsule wall
and surrounding tissue.
Key to local suborders of Sphaerocarpales
la Plants terrestrial; distribution confined to winter rainfall regions of southern Africa; highly diverse in appear-
ance— subspherical and pouch-like or dorsiventrally flattened with lateral, leaf-like lobes; cells uniform, all
lacking oil bodies; spores single or in tetrads:
2a Thalli monoicous, very small, subspherical and pouch-like; outer protective layers with air chambers sur-
rounding carpocephalum, the wall in the latter interrupted by barrel air pores; spores single, hemispheri-
cal, ornamentation finely tuberculate suborder Monocarpineae sensu Carr
2b Plants dioicous, heterothallic, males very much smaller than females, stems dorsiventrally flattened, laterally
divided into unistratose, leaf-like lobes, without air chambers and air pores; gametangia surrounded by
small or large (depending on sex) flask-shaped involucres; spores in local species remaining in tetrads,
ornamentation ridged suborder Sphaerocarpineae Cavers
lb Plants aquatic; distribution in both winter and summer rainfall regions of southern Africa; uniform in appearance,
consisting of erect stem, dorsally bearing undulate wing and small leaf scales at sides and ventrally; cells
dimorphic, some with an oil body; spores single, ornamentation various suborder Riellineae R.M.Schust.
Sphaerocarpineae Cavers. R.M.Schust.: 807
(1992).
Plants terrestrial, dorsiventrally flattened, bilateral,
consisting of a stem (or axis), once or twice to repeated-
ly furcate, laterally invested with delicate, leaf-like
lobes. Ventral scales absent, instead invested with
ephemeral slime papillae. Cells thin-walled, lacking oil
bodies. Rhizoids all smooth, hyaline.
Asexual reproduction absent.
Dioicous, heterothallic, male gametophytes much
smaller than female ones. Antheridia individually devel-
oped inside small, unistratose, brownish purple, flask-
like involucres, in acropetal sequence, crowded along
stem dorsally. Archegonia also enclosed, almost always
individually, in much larger, green, flask-like involu-
cres, wall double-layered only in single South African
species, S. stipitatus', in other species unistratose. Calyp-
tra delicate, unistratose around cleistocarpous capsule,
3- or 4-stratose around short, necrotic seta and sub-
spherical foot, disintegrating when spores reach maturi-
ty, allowing their release, when flask wall also decays.
Spores in permanent tetrads in South African species,
large, external face covered with ridges; in some extra-
South African species separating at maturity, the spore
ornamentation areolate to lamellate. Nutritive cells pre-
sent, but elaters absent.
Sphaerocarpaceae (Dumort.) Heeg in Verhand-
lungen der kaiserlich-koniglichen zoologisch-botanischen
Gesellschaft in Wien 41: 573 (1891) (‘Sphaerocarpeae’);
Mull.Frib.: 310 (1951-1958); S.W.Arnell: 8 (1963);
R.M.Schust.: 810(1992).
Tribe Sphaerocarpeae Dumort. 13: 163 (1874).
Subfamily Sphaerocarpoideae Schiffn.: 50 (1893);
Engl.: 49 (1898).
The Sphaerocarpineae include only the single family,
Sphaerocarpaceae; hence, the details in the subordinal
description are not repeated here.
Sphaerocarpos (Micheli) Boehmer in C.G. Lud-
wig, Definitiones generum plantarum: 501 (1760);
Haynes: 219 (1910); Prosk.: 153 (1954); S.W.Arnell: 8
(1963); R.M.Schust.: 816 (1992). Type: S. michelii
Bellardi.
Sphaerocarpos Micheli: 4, t. 3 (1729).
Sphaerocarpus Adanson: 15 (1763) [orth. var.];
Steph.: 655 (1899); Mull.Frib.: 310 (1951-1958).
Plants ephemeral, gregarious to scattered; stems once
or twice (or more frequently) furcately branching, dor-
siventrally flattened, laterally invested with delicate, suc-
cubously inserted, leaf-like lobes; ventrally (and apical-
ly) with scattered slime papillae; ventrally with smooth,
hyaline rhizoids.
Dioicous, strongly heterothallic; gametangia individ-
ually enveloped by flask-shaped involucres, small in
male plants, but much larger in females, which are ses-
sile or stipitate, wall unistratose, only exceptionally bis-
tratose, eventually containing globose capsule and short
seta with foot. Spores remaining in tetrads or separating
at maturity, ornamentation reticulate or ridged.
Species in the genus fall into two, well-defined groups
that were recently segregated by Schuster (1992).
Key to subgenera of Sphaerocarpos
la Sporophytes delicate, sessile on stem or axis; wall of flasks
unistratose, without cells projecting as processes on their
inner surfaces subgenus Sphaerocarpos
lb Sporophytes firm, stipitate, but length of stalk variable; wall
of flasks bistratose, with inner surface bearing inward-
projecting, finger-like cells, rich in chloroplasts
subgenus Austrosphaerocarpos R.M.Schust.
Proskauer (1954) concluded that the specific epithet
stipitatus for this species was apt, since such a stalk did
not exist in any other species of the genus. The longest
stalk that he measured was ± 1.5 mm. Recently, howev-
er, Long (1993) reported that in the material from Nepal
and Portugal (Sergio & Sim-Sim 1989), ‘the female
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
19
flasks have an extremely short basal stalk’. The stalks I
measured were also short, only 200-795 pm in length,
which would support Long’s observation that, ‘develop-
ment of the stipe must be considered variable’, hence the
minor alteration I made to Schuster’s (1992) key to the
subgenus Austrosphaerocarpus.
Sphaerocarpos stipitatus Bisch. ex Lindenb.,
Verhandlungen der kaiserlichen Leopoldinisch-carolinis-
chen deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher 10 (= Nova
acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae ger-
manicae naturae curiosorum 18): 504 i (1837); Haynes:
228 (1910); Prosk.: 144 (1954); Prosk.: 63 (1955);
S.W.Arnell: 8 (1963); Sergio & Sim-Sim: 414 (1989);
Long: 77 (1993). Type: Chile, Quillota, Bertero 695 (PC,
holo.).
Sphaerocarpus berteri Mont.: 39 (1838); Nees: 369 (1838); Mont.:
50 (1839); Gottsche et al.: 595 (1846).
Sphaerocarpus berteroi Mont. orth. mut.; Steph.: 657 (1899); noin.
inval., orthographic variant for S. berteri.
Plants ephemeral to short-lived, gregarious or scat-
tered; stems once or twice, to repeatedly furcately
branching and forming partial rosettes; markedly het-
erothallic, male gametophytes tiny (Figure 1A, B),
antheridial flasks purplish brown, intimately associated
with much larger (x 10), light green, female gameto-
phytes. Stems somewhat indeterminate, in both sexes
prostrate, dorsiventrally flattened, in the middle up to
260-300 pm thick, consisting of (2-)3 or 4 layers of
thin-walled, 4- or 5-sided, elongated cells, 112.5-1 60.0 x
45-75 pm, ventral cell layer with scattered slime papil-
lae, 37.5-62.5 x 17.5-22.5 pm, raised on smaller or larg-
er basal cell; above mostly obscured by crowded
gametangia, each with a small or large (depending on
sex) flask-shaped involucre, produced in acropetal
sequence, usually in 2 series; laterally giving rise to deli-
cate, unistratose, translucent, alternate, succubously ori-
ented, leaf-like lobes; ventrally anchored to substrate by
rhizoids, all smooth, hyaline, 30-50 pm wide.
Dioicous. Male plants with branches (Figure 3A)
1250-1750 x 525-625 pm, tapering apically, close
together and almost parallel to widely divergent, lateral-
ly with mostly obscured, leaf-like lobes (Figure 1C, D),
fan-shaped, 650-1025 pm long, above 400—97 5 (— 1 1 00 )
pm wide, narrowing toward base, 100-650 pm wide;
upper marginal cells mostly subquadrate, 40-50 x
47.5- 70.0 pm, middle laminal cells long-rectangular,
132.5- 145.0 x 42.5-62.5 pm, basal cells 125.0-137.5 x
75.0- 87.5 pm. Antheridial involucres (Figures 2B; 3B,
C) generally in 2 or 3 series along segments, sessile,
flask-shaped, 250-280 pm high, apically contracted,
opening surrounded by 7 or 8 vertically oriented cells,
45.0- 62.5(-92.5) x 25-30 pm, their apices projecting
somewhat, median sector inflated, width across 180-200
pm, wall unistratose, cells generally 4-sided, sometimes
their walls bulging, mostly 50.0-67.5 x 27.5^45.0 pm.
Antheridia (Figure 2A) individually nearly completely
enclosed by flasks, only apical ones not discharged,
ovoid, ± 125 x 82.5 pm, raised on short pedicel, up to
57.5 x 17.5 pm, consisting of uniseriate column of 5
cells.
Female plants pseudodichotomously branching 1-3
times, forming partial rosettes, 4. 5-6. 5 mm across,
sometimes segments simple (Figure IE) or nearly so, ±
4.4 x 2.6 mm, lateral leaf-like lobes (Figure 1F-M)
mostly single, occasionally bilobed, obovate, size vari-
able, 1075-2500 x 625-3375 pm above, narrower below,
275-1125 pm wide; cells at upper margin (Figure IN)
usually isodiametric, 55.0-57.5 x 50.0-62.5 pm, thin-
walled, sometimes cell projecting at angle much larger, ±
52.5 x 145 pm, cells at lateral margin 87.5-125.0 x
30.0- 42.5 pm; upper laminal and median cells long-
hexagonal, 92.5-200.0 x 50-70 pm, basal cells
155.0- 177.5 x 55-105 pm. Archegonial involucres often
crowded together, obscuring leaf-like lobes (Figure 3D),
sessile when first initiated, later stalked (Figure 3E),
ellipsoidal or bluntly conical (Figure 2C-E), at maturity
1800-3000 pm high, width 750— J 125 pm across widest,
basal part, narrowing gradually upwards to mouth and
generally more abruptly below towards stalk, mouth
(Figure 3F) usually 250-300 pm wide, surrounded by
unistratose ring of 16 or more hyaline cells, 100-105 x
50-60 pm, rounded above and projecting somewhat
crenulately; rarely, larger involucre containing 2 sporo-
phytes (Figure 2F), 3625 pm high, at mouth ± 625 pm
wide, 2050 pm wide across basal part; below mouth rest
of involucral wall double-layered: outer cells hyaline,
chloroplasts absent, long-rectangular above (Figure 21),
125.0- 147.5 x 40.0^42.5 pm, lower down gradually
enlarging (Figure 2H), 5- or 6-sided, 150-300 x 75—125
pm; inner cells (Figure 2J-L) finger-like, much more
numerous, in clusters, rich in chloroplasts, with free,
downward curving, papilliform tips, up to 185 x 32.5 pm
in upper part of flask, smaller lower down and often
becoming partially destroyed. Stalk developing by inter-
calary growth, length variable, 200-795 pm, width
175-250 pm, in cross section (Figure 2G) mostly with 6
cells across, cells in outer row 30-40 x 40-60 pm, inner
cells in 4 rows, ± 75 x 75 pm. Calyptra remaining unrup-
tured for a long period enveloping mature capsule, seta
and foot (Figure 2M) hyaline, mostly unistratose, cells
4-6-sided, 65-145 x 65-100 pm, smaller above, where
crowned by persistent archegonial neck (Figure 2N) and
below, where closely investing seta and foot, here up to
4-stratose. Archegonial neck 75-85 x 30.0-37.5 pm,
formed by 6 rows of cells and reportedly (Schuster 1992)
with only 2 neck-canal cells. Capsule 650-825 pm
diam., wall (Figure 2Q) unistratose, lacking thickenings,
cells ± 5-sided, 37.5-65.0 x 37.5-50.0 pm, densely cov-
ered with starch granules, particularly when young; with
age their number apparently reduced, subround or oval,
5.0- 12.5 x 5-10 pm. Seta (Figure 20) with 4 cell rows,
very short, ± 100 x 40 pm, becoming necrotic. Foot part-
ly fused with calyptra below, bulbous, ± 270 x 220 pm,
resting on ‘platform’ of cells filling basal part of flask,
cells 100-170 x 75-125 pm; in cross section (Figure 2P)
centrally with several ‘haustorial’ cells, roughly triangu-
lar, corners rounded, ± 42.5 pm long, up to 47.5 pm wide
across widest part, surrounded by thin layer of non-cel-
lular tissue and then by 2 or 3 rows of hyaline cells, the
largest, outermost cells 30.0-37.5 x 32.5-37.5 pm.
Spores remaining in tetrads, 87.5-112.5 pm diam., yel-
low-brown to dark brown; 3 (Figure 4C) or all 4 spores
(Figure 4A, B, D, E) of tetrad visible at the same time,
joined at thin line in narrow groove (Figure 4F), ± 2.5
pm wide, ornamentation ridged, with 16-19 minutely
20
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 1 — Sphaerocarpos stipitatus. A, B, dorsal view of male gametophytes with antheridial involucres; C, D, young male, and older, leaf-
like lobes, respectively; E, dorsal view of female gametophyte with stem (‘axis’) and lateral, leaf-like lobes; F-M, female leaf-like lobes;
N, detail of leaf-like lobe. A-N, Koekemoer 1425. Scale bars: A-M, 500 pm; N, 100 pm. Artist: Gillian Condy.
papillate ridges, sometimes branched and up to 10 pm
apart, running from centre of distal faces outward and
stopping short at groove, rarely forming incomplete are-
olae. Nutritive cells (Figure 2R1-3) generally ovoid,
42.5-50.0 x 30.0-37.5 pm, apparently with several
nuclei (4-8), resulting from mitoses and therefore
remaining diploid, sometimes 4-celled; although con-
taining starch granules and chloroplasts, their role in
nutrition of developing spores not proven. Release of
spores and nutritive cells by disintegration of the capsule
wall, then by the calyptra and finally by the wall of the
flask.
DISCUSSION
The genus Sphaerocarpos has aroused much interest,
because sex chromosomes in plants were first found in
S. donnellii by Allen (1919). Since then, it has been
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
21
FIGURE 2. — Sphaerocarpos stipitatus. A, male involucre containing antheridium partly exposed; B, male involucre; C, archegonium and flask;
D, E, older flasks; F, large flask with 2 capsules; G, c/s stalk; H, cells in outer wall of flask (without chloroplasts). I-L, wall of flask: I,
mouth and upper part from outside; J, mouth and upper part with papilliform cells from inside; K, c/s with larger, clear outer cells and
smaller, inner cells containing numerous chloroplasts; L, inner cells more enlarged. M, younger capsule, with seta and foot enveloped by
calyptra; N, calyptra, above with persistent archegonial neck, below covering seta and foot; O, c/s seta; P, c/s foot; Q, capsule wall with-
out thickenings, but covered with starch grains; R1-R3, nutritive cells. A-R3, Koekemoer 1425. Scale bars: A-C, L, P, 50 pm; D-F, 500
pm; G-K, 100 pm; M, N, 200 pm; O, Q, R1-R3, 25 pm. Artist: Gillian Condy.
22
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 3. — Sphaerocarpos stipitatus. A, male plant covered with numerous antheridial involucres; B, antheridial flasks, with arrow indicating
upper cell of slime papilla; C, mouth of antheridial flask; D, female plant with leaf-like lobes and 3 flasks, 4th flask removed, remainder
of its stalk indicated by arrow; at top, right comer tip of male branch covered in flasks, to compare difference in sizes of male and female
plants; E, female plant with single flask on longer stalk, partly hidden by leaf-like lobe; F, mouth of female flask. A-F, Koekemoer 1425.
A, x 45; B, x 135; C, x 254; D, x 8.5; E, x 14; F, x 83.
repeatedly studied with regard to its genetics and cytol-
ogy; furthermore, a number of cultures have been main-
tained for lengthy periods of time.
In several aspects, the gametophyte, with its prostrate
stem (or axis) and delicate, 2-ranked, succubously insert-
ed leaf-like lobes, resembles Fossombronia species, but
so-called ‘angle’ leaves at the fork of dichotomies, as
described by Proskauer (1954) and Schuster (1992), have
not been observed by me in the present study, although I.
am familiar with them from my work on the Fossom-
broniaceae (Perold 1999a).
FIGURE 4. — Sphaerocarpos stipitatus. A-E, spore tetrads; F, groove where 3 of tetrads are joined. A, E.A.C.L.E. Schelpe 4877 (BOL); B, Toelken
1978 (BOL); C, A.S.L. Schelpe 760 (BOL); D, S.M. Perold 1838; E, Koekemoer 1425; F, Oliver 8961. A, D, x 366; B, x 439; C, x 374; E,
x 347; F, x 682.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
23
The gametophyte in Sphaerocarpos species is delicate
and lacks physiological drought resistance (Schuster
1992); it is, nevertheless, adapted to warm and some-
times disturbed areas, with adequate moisture only sea-
sonally and with intervening long, dry periods. It is
regarded as an ecological specialist and is a temporary
component of vegetation that frequently endures drought
in summer. To cope with such an environment, its life
cycle is considerably shortened and development of the
sporophyte is accelerated; it survives the dry periods as
spores, which generally remain in tetrads, eventually
giving rise to two male plants in close proximity to two
female plants, thus ensuring that fertilisation takes place
and that a new generation will ensue.
In using a molecular approach by determining
sequences for the 18S-r RNA gene to construct phyloge-
netic trees of a number of bryophytes, Capesius & Bopp
(1997) concluded that the Sphaerocarpales diverged
early as a separate clade among the Marchantiopsida.
Ecology
In southern Africa, S. stipitatus is restricted to the
winter rainfall regions of the Northern, Western and
Eastern Cape, which experience hot, dry summers
(Figure 5). The plants grow at altitudes ranging from sea
level to ± 1 200 m, on moist, fine-grained, sandy to
clayey soils or on mud; at drainage ditches, water cours-
es or on earth banks; under fynbos, short karroid scrub or
grass, often together with mosses and Riccia species. The
localities fall in several different vegetation types, name-
ly Mountain Fynbos, Upland and Lowland Succulent
Karoo, as well as Grassy Fynbos (Low & Rebelo 1996).
Dates when sporulating material was collected, range
from the end of July to early October.
Specimens examined
Britten 58348 (BOL).
Koekemoer 1425 (PRE).
Magill & Schelpe 3961 A (PRE).
Oliver 8961 (PRE).
Perold 1838 (PRE).
A.S.L. Schelpe 760 (BOL58344)\ E.A.C.L.E. Schelpe 4877 ( BOL58346 ),
4918b ( BOL58345 ).
Toelken 1978 (BM) (BOL58347) (ridges rather thicker in the spores
from this specimen; see Figure 4B).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My sincere thanks are extended to Dr D.G. Long for
kindly refereeing this paper, to the Curator of BOL for
the loan of specimens; to Dr O.A. Leistner for his valu-
able advice and to my colleagues at NBI for kindly col-
lecting specimens of S. stipitatus, and particularly, to Ms
M. Koekemoer, Curator of PRE, for collecting and care-
fully tending live material; also to Ms G. Condy for the
drawings; Mrs A. Romanowski for developing and print-
ing the micrographs and to Ms D. Maree for typing the
manuscript.
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 26 30 32 34
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Sphaerocarpos stipitatus in southern
Africa. Pocock specimen not indicated on map (grid reference
3326AD), because I did not examine it.
REFERENCES
ADANSON, M. 1763. Famille des Plantes 2: 1-640. Vincent, Paris.
ALLEN, C.E. 1919. The basis of sex inheritance in Sphaerocarpos.
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 58:
289-316.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural
Science Council, Stockholm.
CAPESIUS, I. & BOPP, M. 1997. New classification of liverworts
based on molecular and morphological data. Plant Systematics
and Evolution 207: 87-97.
CAVERS, F. 1910. The inter-relationships of the Bryophyta. New
Phytologist 9: 81-91.
DUMORTIER, B.C.J. 1874. Hepaticae Europae. Bulletin de la Societe
Royale de Botanique de Belgique 13: 1-203.
ENGLER, A. 1898. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, edn 2: 49.
GOTTSCHE, C M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESEN-
BECK, C.G. 1846. Synopsis hepaticarum. Meissner, Hamburg.
Reprinted 1967, Cramer, Lehre.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Nomina generica hepaticarum: references, types
and synonymies. Acta Botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
HAYNES, C.C. 1910. Sphaerocarpos hians sp. nov., with a revision of
the genus and illustrations of the species. Bulletin of the Torrey
Botanical Club 37: 215-230.
HEEG, M. 1891. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-kbniglichen zoologisch-
botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 41: 573 (‘Sphaerocarpeae’).
LINDENBERG, J.B.W. 1837. Nachtrage zur Monographic der
Riccieen. Verhandlungen der kaiserlichen Leopoldinisch-car-
olinischen deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher 10 (= Nova
acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae germanicae
naturae curiosorum 18): 504. i. t. 32.
LONG, D.G. 1993. Notes on Himalayan Hepaticae 1. Sphaerocarpos
subg. Austrosphaerocarpos Schust. in the Nepal Himalaya.
Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 74: 77-81 .
LOW, A.B. & REBELO, A.G. (eds). 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs
& Tourism, Pretoria.
LUDWIG, C.G. 1760. Definitiones generum plantarum. Leipzig.
MICHELI, PA. 1729. Nova plantarum genera. Firenze.
MONTAGNE, J.F.C. 1838. Centurie des plantes cellulaires exotiques
nouvelles. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Bot. Ser. 2, 9:
38-57.
MONTAGNE, J.F.C. 1839. Florula boliviensis. In A. d’Orbigny,
Voyage dans I’Amerique meridionale 7, part 2. Paris.
MULLER, K. (Miill.Frib.) 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr.
L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora 6, edn 3.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europdis-
chen-Lebermoose 4. Breslau.
PEROLD, S.M. 1999a. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 10. Three new species
from Northern and Western Cape. Bothalia 29: 83-93.
PEROLD, S.M. 1999b. Studies in the Sphaerocarpales (Hepaticae)
from southern Africa. 1 . The genus Monocarpus and its only
member, M. sphaerocarpus. Bothalia 29: 225-230.
24
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
PROSKAUER, J. 1954. On Sphaerocarpos stipitatus and the genus
Sphaerocarpos . Journal of the Linnean Society of London,
Botany 55: 143-157.
PROSKAUER, J. 1955. The Sphaerocarpales of South Africa. The
Journal of South African Botany 21: 63-75.
SCHIFFNER, V. 1893. Hepaticae (Lebermoose). In H.G.A. Engler &
K.A.E. Prantl (1909). Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien , edn 1,
1.3: 3-141 [publication date Sept. 1893 fide Stafleu & Cowan,
Taxonomic literature 5: 151 (1985)].
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America 5: 798-827. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SCOTT, G.A.M. 1985. Southern Australian liverworts. Australian
Flora and Fauna Series, No. 2.
SERGIO, C. & SIM-SIM, M. 1989. Sphaerocarpos stipitatus Bisch. ex
Lindenb. na Europa. Especie introduzida em Portugal desde o
seculo passado. Notulae bryoflorae lusitanicae III. Portugaliae
Acta Biologica, Serie B, 15: 414—416.
STEPHANI, F. 1899. Species hepaticarum 1. Bulletin de I'Herbier
Boissier 7. Geneve.
Bothalia 30,1 : 25-30 (2000)
FSA contributions 15: Piperaceae
K.L. IMMELMAN*
Herbs, shrubs or rarely small trees, evergreen, often
succulent when herbaceous, often epiphytic or lithophyt-
ic, sometimes aromatic, erect or scandent; nodes often
swollen or jointed; stems with vascular strands distinct
and somewhat scattered as in monocots. Leaves usually
alternate, rarely opposite or verticillate, simple, entire;
stipules absent or adnate to petiole. Inflorescence a dense
cylindrical fleshy spike; spikes may be arranged in an
umbel. Flowers minute, bisexual or unisexual, without
perianth, each flower subtended by a peltate bract.
Stamens 1-10, hypogynous; filaments usually free;
anthers often articulated on the filaments; thecae 2, dis-
tinct or confluent. Ovary superior, unilocular, with a sin-
gle basal, erect ovule; stigmas 1-5, short, often brush-
like and lateral in Peperomia. Fruit baccate, with a suc-
culent, thin or dry pericarp, often sunken into succulent
rachis. Seeds globose, ovoid or oblong in outline, testa
membranous or rather fleshy, embryo minute.
A family of about eight genera and over 3 000
species; widespread in warm areas but especially com-
mon in South and Central America and in central Asia.
There are two genera represented in the FSA area, Piper
and Peperomia.
Various species are the source of pepper, cubebs and
various narcotics, and species of both genera are grown
as houseplants for their decorative foliage.
Shrubs; anther thecae usually distinct; stigmas 2 Piper
Herbs; anther thecae usually confluent; stigma 1 Peperomia
1862000 PIPER
Piper L., Species plantarum, edn 1: 28 (1753);
L.: 18 (1754); C.DC.: 240 (1869); Benth. & Hook.f.:
129 (1880); Baker & C.H.Wright: 144 (1902-1913);
C.H. Wright: 488 (1912); Keay: 84 (1954); Emboden: 91,
129 (1972); R.A.Dyer: 29 (1975); Tebbs: 518 (1993);
Verde.: 1 (1996); Diniz: 25 (1997); Mabb.: 560 (1997).
Type: P. nigrum L.
Erect or scandent herbs, shrubs or rarely trees;
branches terete, jointed at nodes. Leaves alternate, entire,
sometimes asymmetrical at base, penninerved; stipules
adnate to petiole or connate into a leaf-opposed sheath.
Inflorescence a dense, cylindrical spike, terminal on ends
of stems or on leaf-opposed short shoots; bracts sessile,
peltate. Flowers bisexual, sessile, without perianth.
Stamens 2; filaments very short; thecae distinct. Ovary
sessile; stigmas 2, distinct, recurved; ovule solitary,
basal. Fruit globose, compressed, sessile; pericarp thin
and dry.
* Range and Forage Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Private
Bag X05, 0039 East Lynne, Pretoria.
Characters not applicable in South Africa: Flowers
unisexual, may be pedicellate. Stamens 3 or 4, rarely
5-many; filaments occasionally longer than bracts.
Ovary rarely stipitate; stigmas up to 5, may be erect.
Fruit rarely stipitate; pericarp may be succulent.
A large genus of over 2 000 species; in Asia as far east
as Japan, in tropical America, with a few species in
Africa. A single species, P capense, occurs in southern
Africa.
As well as P. capense, a second species, P. borbo-
nense (Miq.) C.DC., was recorded from the FSA area by
Wright (1912). He cited specimens of Verraux and
Gueinzius, both without precise locality. Killick (1970)
considered that the Gueinzius specimen was probably
destroyed during World War II, while the Verraux speci-
men proved to be a true P borbonense. Killick suggest-
ed that the wrong label was placed on this specimen, and
certainly no other specimen of this species has been seen
from southern Africa by me. Possibly the Gueinzius
specimen was either mislabelled or misidentified, but
this is now impossible to determine. P borbonense is
quite different from P. capense, as it is parasitic and dioe-
cious.
Various species of Piper are the source of spices and
narcotics. P. nigrum, originally from India and brought
from there to Java, is the source of commercial pepper.
The ripened fruit with the pericarp removed gives white
pepper, while the more pungent black pepper comes
from the unripened fruit milled whole.
In S Asia and the islands of the Indian and Pacific
oceans, Piper betle leaves are rolled with a piece of betel
palm ( Areca catechu) and lime, and chewed as a mild
stimulant. P methysticum, which is closely related to
pepper, is cultivated in the Pacific Islands. The roots and
lower stem are chewed and used to make a beverage
called kava-kava, which has a relaxing effect (Emboden
1972).
Piper capense L.f, Supplementum plantarum 90
(1781); Thunb.: 443 (1823); C.DC.: 339 (1869); C.DC.:
224 (1894); Engl.: 146 (1913); Baker & C.H.Wright: 146
(1902-1913); C.H.Wright: 488 (1912); Eyles: 337
(1915); Keay: 84 (1954); Killick: t. 1583 (1970); Agnew:
88 (1974); Coates Palgrave: 90 (1977).
var. capense Verde.: 5 (1996); Diniz: 27 (1997).
Type: Western Cape, growing in forest in Outeniquas and
Grootvadersbos, near river, Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.;
microfiche in PRE, No. 713!).
Herb or soft-wooded shrub, rarely a small tree, some-
times scrambling, 0.5— 2.5(— 3.5) m high; stems swollen
at nodes. Leaves ovate to very broadly ovate, 70-130 x
26
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
26— 95(— 1 15) mm, palmately 5-7-nerved, apex attenuate,
base truncate or cordate, occasionally cuneate, may be
symmetrical or asymmetrical, dark glossy green above,
paler below, with hairs when young, later only on under-
surface along veins, glabrescent above; petiole chan-
neled above, 10-50 mm long; stipules present. Inflores-
cence a slender cylindrical spike, terminating either the
main shoot or the short leaf-opposed side shoots, ±
30-50 mm long (in flower), up to 80 mm long (in fruit).
Flowers subtended by peltate bracts; stamens 2 or 3;
ovary ovoid; style short, with 2 stigmas. Fruits com-
pressed-ovoid, with a membranous reddish pericarp.
Figure 1.
Occurs in central, western, eastern and southern
Africa; in South Africa is found from Northern Province
to Eastern Cape, and then disjunctly from the Knysna-
Tsitsikamma area as far west as Western Cape: Swel-
lendam, Grootvadersbos (Figure 2). It grows in the un-
derstorey of densely shady, moist forests.
Vouchers: Botha & Van Wyk 1017 (PRE); Galpin 10084 (PRE);
Meeuse 10005 (PRE); Strey 9340 (NH, PRE); Watt & Brandwyk 1767
(PRE).
FIGURE 1. — Piper capense: A,,
habit, x 0.87 ; B, fruiting
inflorescence, x 1.75; C, part
of fruiting inflorescence, x 5;
D, flower with bract and two
stamens, x 13. A, D, Werger
1443 ; B, Story 4207 ; C, Strey
9014. Artist: G. Condy.
The main shoot often ends in an inflorescence or a
leaf and growth then continues from a shoot further back.
These side shoots may continue to grow but more usual-
F1GURE 2. — Distribution of Piper capense var. capense in southern
Africa.
Bothalia 30, 1 (2000)
27
ly end in a leaf or sometimes in an inflorescence. When
they do end in a leaf, the leaves of the plant may appear
superficially to be opposite rather than alternate, but
careful examination will show the presence of the stipule
or of the scar left where the stipule has abscised. The
stipules may either be deciduous or else clasp the petiole.
The fruits have a pleasant spicy smell rather like that
of cloves; this intensifies when they are boiled. They
have been recorded as having been used as a spice in the
past but, as far as is known, are no longer so used.
1866000 PEPEROMIA
Peperomia Ruiz & Pav., Flore peruvianae et
chilensis prodromus: 8 (1794); C.DC.: 391 (1869);
Benth. & Hook.f.: 132 (1880); Baker & C.H.Wright: 147
(1902-1913); C.H.Wright: 489 (1912); Metcalf & Chalk:
1120 (1950); Keay: 81 (1954); Dull: 56 (1973);
R. A. Dyer: 30 (1975); Van Jaarsv.: 67 (1992); Tebbs: 519
(1993); Verde.: 9 (1996): Diniz: 29 (1997); Mabb.: 540
(1997). Type: P. secunda Ruiz. & Pav.
Annual or perennial succulent herbs, ascending or
prostrate; branches jointed at nodes. Leaves alternate,
opposite or verticillate, entire, palmately or penninerved;
stipules absent. Inflorescence a cylindrical spike, termi-
nal or axillary, solitary or aggregated. Flowers bisexual,
sessile on thickened rachis, without perianth, with short-
stalked peltate bracts. Stamens 2; filaments short; anther
thecae 2, confluent. Ovary sessile; stigma undivided,
usually penicellate; ovule solitary, basal. Fruit minute,
globose or ellipsoid; pericarp thin and dry.
Characters not applicable in South Africa: species
may be a subshrub or climber.
A genus of about 1 000 species, cosmopolitan in
warm areas, especially America. In Africa there are 18
species. Five species are recorded from the FSA area by
Dull, but only four are accepted in this treatment.
The species excluded from this treatment is P. pellu-
cida (L.) Humb., Bonpl. & Kunth. Dull (1973) cited only
one specimen from our area, Bey rich 99 (B; Beleg durch
Bomben vernichtet), from Pondoland, which was proba-
bly destroyed in Berlin. The same specimen was quoted
by Wright (1909) under the name P. nana (a synonym of
P. pellucida ), but he did not indicate that he saw the speci-
men, as was his practice with all other specimens seen.
The description is a direct translation from De Candolle
(1869), where P. nana was originally described. Baker &
Wright (1909) did not record P. pellucida from further
south than the Zambesi in Mozambique, and it is possi-
ble that Beyrich 99 was misidentified. No specimens of
P. pellucida from within the FSA area have been seen by
me, and it has therefore been decided to exclude it from
this treatment. The species is annual, with the leaves
alternate, glabrous, cordate at the base, about as wide as
long, and widest below the middle.
Key to species
la Leaves ± ovate in whorls of 3 or 4 at nodes; stems succulent;
flowers densely crowded on rachis 1 . P. tetraphylla
lb Leaves 1 or 2 at nodes; flowers usually loosely arranged
along the axis or, if dense, then leaves orbicular and
steins not succulent:
2a Leaves opposite, pilose 4 P. blanda
2b Leaves mostly alternate, may be opposite below an inflo-
rescence, glabrous or pilose:
3a Leaves orbicular, occasionally broadly ovate, 4—10 mm
long; stems prostrate and non-succulent; fertile por-
tion of inflorescence 2-6 mm long 2. P. rotundifolia
3b Leaves elliptic, ovate or obovate, 8-50 mm long; stems
succulent, usually ascending; fertile portion of inflores-
cence 10-45 mm long 3. P retusa
1. Peperomia tetraphylla (G.Forst.) Hook. & Arn.,
The botany of Captain Beechey’s Voyage: 97 (1841);
Yuncker: 188 (1962); Dull: 72 (1973); Bond & Goldblatt:
355 (1984); Van Jaarsv.: 68 (1992); Verde.: 12 (1996);
Diniz: 29 (1997). Type: Society Islands, Forster s.n.
(GOET, holo.; K, iso.).
Piper tetraphyllum G.Forst.: 5 (1786).
Piper reflexum L.f.: 91 (1781); Thunb.: 443 (1823). Peperomia
reflexa (L.f.) A.Dietr.: 180 (1831) non Humb., Bonpl. & Kunth (1816);
C.DC.: 451 (1869); Hook.f.: 99 (1890); Baker & C.H.Wright: 155
(1902-1913); C.H.Wright: 490 (1912); Compton: 171 (1976). Type:
Western Cape, Outeniqua Mountains, in woods, among mosses on tree
trunks, Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.; microfiche in PRE No. 752!).
Peperomia reflexa forma capense Miq.: 169 (1843). P. reflexa var.
capense (Miq.) C.DC.: 451 (1869); C.H.Wright: 490 (1912); Batten &
Bokelmann: 57, t. 50,1 (1966). Syntypes: Western Cape, Cape
Peninsula, Drege s.n. (not found); Eastern Cape, near Uitenhage,
Verraux 1831 in hb. Delessert (G!); Western Cape, Hangklip, Mund &
Maire s.n. (not found); Bourbon Island, Richard in Paris Mus. hb. 707
(P!); Mauritius, Aub. du Petit Thours (not found).
Micropiper pusillum Miq.: 62, t. 5, fig. B (1839). Type: Java,
Tjirebon Province, Tjerimai Mountain, upper slopes on tree trunks,
Blume s.n. (not found).
Succulent herb; stems ascending to suberect (Figure
3E), rooting at nodes and forming a mat. Leaves in
whorls of 3 or 4, succulent, broadly rhomboid-ovate to
ovate, glabrous, 7—1 5(— 25) x 5— 1 1 (— 1 4) mm, base and
apex rounded, faintly 3-veined from base, may have 3
pale stripes along veins, dark green above and paler to
grey-green below, may be punctate below; petiole
1. 5-4.0 mm long. Inflorescence terminal only, fertile
portion 7-11 mm long (in flower), 1 3— 20(— 25) mm long
(in fruit). Flowers with bracts ± 0.3 mm diam. Fruit ± 1
mm long, glanduliferous, long-ellipsoid, with pseudo-
cupule at base.
Pantropical; in southern Africa is found in a number
of localities in Northern Province, North-West, Mpuma-
langa, Gauteng, Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho
and in Eastern and Western Cape, from East Griqualand
to Bredasdorp (Figure 4). Epiphytic or lithophytic, often
growing among mosses.
Vouchers: Compton 26918 (PRE); Gibbs Russell 3824 (PRE);
Meeuse 10355 (PRE); Scheepers 69 (PRE); Van Wyk & Theron 4534
(PRE).
28
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
2. Peperomia rotundifolia (L.) Humb., Bonpl. &
Kunth , Nova genera et species plantarum 1: 65 (1816);
Keay: 83 (1954); Dull: 85 (1973); Van Jaarsv.: 68 (1992);
Verde.: 12 (1996); Diniz: 33 (1997). Iconotype: America
Calidiore (Martinique), Plunder, Traitedes Fougeres de
l’Amerique 52, t. 69 (1693).
Piper rotundifolium L.: 30 (1753).
Herb; stems slender, trailing, not succulent, rooting at
nodes. Leaves alternate, succulent, orbicular or some-
times broadly obovate, glabrous or pilose, 4-10 x
3— 7(— 1 0) mm, apex rounded to emarginate, base round-
ed tq broadly cuneate; petiole 1-3 mm long.
Inflorescence axillary, short and dense, 2-6 mm long (in
flower). Fruit not seen.
Found in South America and the southern USA., in
Africa, the Comores and Madagascar; within South
Africa it is rare and restricted in distribution to southern
KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape (Figure 5). It is epi-
phytic or lithophytic.
FIGURE 3. — A-D, Peperomia blan-
da , Hardy 399 1: A, habit, x
0.88; B, flowering inflores-
cence, x 13; C, fruiting inflo-
rescence, x 13; D, fruit, x
26.6. E, Peperomia tetra-
phylla, Venter 3786: habit, x
0.88. Artist: G. Condy.
Vouchers: Flanagan 1821 (PRE); Pegler 763 (PRE); Strey 5823,
6648 (PRE); Venter 883 (PRE).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Peperomia tetraphylla in southern
Africa.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
29
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Peperomia rotundifolia in southern
Africa.
3. Peperomia retusa (L.f.) A.Dietr., Species plan-
tarum 1: 155 (1831); C.DC.: 446 (1869); C.H.Wright:
491 (1912); Marloth: 128 (1913); Keay: 82 (1954); Dull:
89 (1973); Compton: 171 (1976); Goldblatt in Bond &
Goldblatt: 355 (1984); Van Jaarsv.: 68 (1992); Verde.: 13
(1996); Diniz: 33 (1997). Type: Cape Province, in
woods, among mosses on tree branches and on rocks,
Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.; microfiche in PRE no. 754!).
Piper retusum L.f.: 91 (1781); Willd.: 165 (1797); Thunb : 443
(1813).
Peperomia retusa var. ciliolata C.DC.: 447 (1869); C.H.Wright: 491
(1912). Type: Diaboli Mountain, Fischer s.n. (not seen, LE vide Diill).
It is uncertain whether this locality is American or South African. There
is a Mount Diablo in California, on the mainland opposite San
Fransisco, or it may refer to Devils Peak, Cape Town. No collecter by
the name of Fischer is known to have been in South Africa, according
to Dr L.E.W. Codd (pers. comm.).
Peperomia retusa var. alternifolia C.DC.: 446 (1869). Type: Cape
Province, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (B, holo.!).
Peperomia bachmannii C.DC.: 227 (1894); C.H.Wright: 491 (1912).
P. retusa var. bachmannii (C.DC.) Diill: 90 (1973). Type: KwaZulu-
Natal. Pondoland, Bachmann 419 (B, holo.!).
Peperomia rehmannii C.DC.: 227 (1894). Syntypes: Northern
Province, Houtbosch, Rehmann 5969 (not found); Western Cape,
Knysna, Rehmann 489 (Z, holo.!).
Peperomia wilmsii C.DC.: 282 (1898). Type: Mpumalanga,
Lydenburg, Spitzkop Mountain, Wilms 1354 (BM!; G!; K!).
Mat-forming herb; stems rooting at nodes, succulent.
Leaves alternate, obovate or sometimes elliptic, 8-32 x
6-16 mm, succulent, glabrous, apex usually rounded to
emarginate, base broadly cuneate to cuneate, dark green,
may be slightly discolorous; petiole 3-7 (-13) mm long.
Inflorescence slender with flowers widely spaced, termi-
nal and axillary, 10-25 mm long (in flower), 25^15 mm
long (in fruit). Fruit ± 1 mm long.
Occurs in tropical and subtropical Africa and
Madagascar; in southern Africa it is the most widespread
species of the genus, being found from Northern
Province, Mpumalanga, Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal,
Eastern and Western Cape in moist areas as far west as
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Peperomia retusa in southern Africa.
the Cape Peninsula, and from sea level to the Dra-
kensberg in Lesotho (Figure 6). Epiphytic or lithophytic.
Vouchers: Bos 1052 (PRE); Mohle 262 (PRE); Venter & Vorster 139
(PRE); Wager s.n. ( PRE30235)\ Zeyde 131 (PRE).
Diill divides the species into three varieties, two of
which, var. retusa and var. bachmannii, occur within the
FSA region. The characters he gives as differing, howev-
er, show considerable intergradation, and it has therefore
been decided here not to keep the two varieties separate.
4. Peperomia blanda (Jacq.) Humb., Bonpl. &
Kunth , Nova genera et species plantarum 1: 67, t. 3'
(1816); Verde.: 18 (1996). Type: specimen grown at
Schoenbrunn, Vienna, from seed collected at Caracas,
Venezuela, Jacquin s.n. (W, holo.; K, photo.!).
Piper blandum Jacq.: 211(1791).
Peperomia leptostachya Hook. & Am.: 70 (1839-1841).
Peperomia arabica Decne. in Miq.: 121 (1843); C.DC.: 442 (1869);
Baker & C.H.Wright: 154 (1902-1913); C.H.Wright: 490 (1912);
Compton: 171 (1976). Syntypes: Arabie felice, PA. Botta s.n. (P!);
KwaZulu-Natal, Port Natal, Drege s.n. (G!).
Peperomia blanda var. leptostachya (Hook. & Am.) Diill: 110, Abb.
16 (1973); Van Jaarsv.: 69 (1992). Type: Hawaii, Oahu Island, Beechey
s.n. (G, holo.!; K!).
Semi-erect herb; stems succulent, rooting at lower
nodes. Leaves opposite, succulent, pilose, ovate, ovate-
rhomboid or slightly obovate, 28-50 x 12-31 mm, apex
acute to rounded, base cuneate, lower leaves smaller and
more rounded; petiole pilose, 6-11 mm long. Inflores-
cence terminal or axillary, slender, with widely-spaced
flowers, 20-45 mm (in flower), 22-145 mm (in fruit).
Bracts ± 0.6 mm diam. Fruit ± 1 mm long. Figure 3A-D.
Pantropical; is the most common Peperomia species
in Central and South America, but less common in
Africa. In southern Africa it occurs from Northern Pro-
vince, Mpumalanga, Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal to
Eastern Cape (Figure 7). It is lithophytic, rarely epiphytic,
growing on cliffs and in pockets of soil among rocks.
30
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 7, — Distribution of Peperomia blanda in southern Africa.
Voucher^: Buitendag 470 (PRE); Codd 7029 (PRE); Hemrn 539
(PRE); Schweickerdt 1425 (PRE); Venter 4577 (PRE); Ward 4110
(PRE).
REFERENCES
AGNEW, A.D.Q. 1974. Upland Kenya wild flowers. Oxford University
Press, London.
BAKER, J.G. & WRIGHT, C.H. 1902-1913. Piperaceae. In T.H.
Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of tropical Africa 6,1: 143-162. Reeve,
London.
BATTEN, A. & BOKELMAN, H. 1966. Wild flowers of the eastern
Cape province. Cape & Transvaal Printers, Cape Town.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1880. Genera plantarum 3,1: 129.
Reeve, London.
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora. Journal
of South African Botany. Suppl. Vol. 13.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik, Cape
Town.
COMPTON, R.H 1976. The Flora of Swaziland. Journal of South
African Botany. Suppl. Vol 1 1 National Botanic Gardens, Cape
Town.
DE CANDOLLE, A. C.P. 1869. Piperaceae. In A.P de Candolle, Pro-
dromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 16,1: 39 1 —47 1 .
Treuttel, Paris.
DE CANDOLLE, A. C P 1894 Piperaceae africanae et madagascarien-
sis. Botanische Jahrbiicher 19: 225-230.
DE CANDOLLE, A. C.P. 1898. Piperaceae nova. Annuaire Conserva-
toire et du Jardin botaniques de Geneve 2: 276-288.
DIETRICH, A. 1831. Species plantarum , edn 6, 1.1: 141-186. Nauk,
Berlin.
DINIZ, M.A. 1997. Piperaceae. In E. Launert, Flora zambesiaca 9,2:
24—37 Flora Zambesiaca Managing Committee, London.
DULL, R. 1973. Die Peperomia-Aften Afrikas. Botanische Jahr-
biicher 93: 56-119.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants 1.
Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
EMBODEN, W. 1972. Narcotic plants. Studio Vista, London.
ENGLER, A. 1913. Die Pflanzenwelt Afrikas 6,1: 146. Engelmann,
Leipzig.
EYLES, F 1915. A record of plants collected in southern Rhodesia.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 5: 337.
FORSTER, J.G. A. 1786. Florulae insularum australium prodromus.
Joann Christian Dietrich, Goettingen.
HOOKER, J.D. 1890. The flora of British India 5: 99. Reeve, London.
HOOKER, W.J. & ARNOTT, G.A.W. 1839-1841. The botany of
Captain Beechey's Voyage, part 8-10: 70-97 . Bolin, London.
HUMBOLDT, F.W.H. VON, BONPLAND, A.J.A. & KUNTH, C.S.
1816. Nova genera et species plantarum I: 65. Lutetiae Pari-
siorum, Paris.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON (1789) 1791. Piper blandum. Collecteana Aus-
triaca ad botanicum, chemiam, et historiam naturalem spectan-
tia cumfiguris 3: 211.
KEAY, R.W.J. 1954. In Flora of West tropical Africa, edn 2, 1.1: 81-84.
Crown Agents, London.
KILLICK, D.J.B. 1970. Piper capense. The Flowering Plants of Africa
40: t. 1583.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1 Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1754. Genera plantarum, edn 5: 48. David, Paris.
LINNAEUS, C. fil. 1782 (‘1781’). Supplementum plantarum. Orphano-
trophi, Brunsvigae.
MABBERLEY, D.J. 1997. The plant book. A portable dictionary of the
higher plants, edn 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MARLOTH, R. 1913. Piperaceae. The flora of South Africa 1. Darter,
Cape Town.
METCALF, C.R. & CHALK, L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons 2:
1120-1127. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
M1QUEL, F.A.W. 1839. Commentarii phytographici 62, t. 5, fig. B, S
& J. Luchtmans, Leiden.
MIQUEL, F.A.W. 1843. Systema piperacearum, fasc. 1: 120-175.
Kramers, Rotterdam.
MIQUEL, F.A.W. 1844. Systema piperacearum, fasc. 2: 303, 343.
Kramers, Rotterdam.
RUIZ, H. & PAVON, J.A. 1794. Flore peruvianae & chilensis prodro-
mus. Cramer, Lehre.
TEBBS, M.C. 1993. Piperaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J.G. Rohwer & V.
Bittrich, The families and genera of vascular plants. 2. dicotyle-
dons: 516-520. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
THUNBERG, C.P 1823. Flora capensis 1: 433. Cottae, Stuttgart.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1992. Peperomia species of South Africa.
Aloe 29: 67-69.
VERDCOURT, B. 1996. Piperaceae. Flora of tropical East Africa:
1-21. Balkema, Rotterdam.
WILLDENOW, C.L. VON 1797. Species plantarum I: 165. Berlin.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1912. Piperaceae. In W.H. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,1: 487^)92. Reeve, London.
YUNCKER, T.G. 1962. Nomenclatural notes on Piperaceae. Brittonia
14: 188.
Bothalia 30,1: 31-33 (2000)
FSA contributions 16: Sphenocleaceae
W.G. WELMAN*
Annual glabrous hygrophytic herbs. Stems erect or
decumbent, somewhat succulent and spongy, usually
swollen with aerenchymatous tissue at base, lower sub-
merged part with a pithy covering. Leaves alternate, sim-
ple, entire, venation pinnate, particularly visible on
lower surface; stipules absent. Inflorescences terminal,
densely spicate, acropetal. Flowers small, bisexual, regu-
lar, subtended by 1 bract and 2 bracteoles. Calyx persis-
tent; tube hemispherical, adnate to ovary; lobes 5, round-
ed, shortly connate, imbricate. Corolla campanulate-
urceolate, perigynous, caducous; lobes 5, imbricate.
Stamens 5, inserted on corolla tube, alternating with
petals; filaments very short, dilated at base; anthers
short, free, suborbicular, 2-thecous, dehiscing longitudi-
nally. Ovary semi-inferior, 2-locular; style 1, very short,
glabrous; stigma capitate, slightly 2-lobed; ovules very
numerous, anatropous, attached to a large spongy stipi-
tate axile placenta. Fruit a membranous, 2-locular,
depressed-globose, circumscissile capsule (pyxidium);
operculum carrying away calyx lobes. Seeds very
numerous, minute, oblong; testa irregularly plicate-
costate; endosperm scanty or absent; embryo axile,
straight, subterete.
A close relationship between Sphenoclea and the
Campanulaceae has been suggested for a long time.
Most systematists have treated the genus either as a
member of the Campanulaceae (Dahlgren 1983), or as a
closely related monogeneric family (Monod 1980;
Cronquist 1988). Sphenoclea is separable from the
Campanulaceae by the imbricate aestivation of the corol-
la lobes, the circumscissile capsule, the absence of a sec-
ondary pollen presentation mechanism, the glabrous
style, and by the apparent absence of latex canals.
Airy Shaw (1948, 1968) regarded this family as an
isolated group, probably marginally related to the Cen-
trospermae, e.g. Phytolacca (habit, anatomy) and per-
haps also to the Primulaceae (circumscissile capsules).
However, Subramanyam (1950) had shown that embry-
ological and anatomical features reveal important differ-
ences between Sphenoclea , Phytolaccaceae and Primu-
laceae. Cosner et al. (1994) suggested a position for
Sphenoclea near the Hydrophyllaceae in the Solanales-
Boraginales, but that family has a late sympetaly. Erbar
(1995) did SEM-investigations on the floral develop-
ment of S. zeylanica and concluded that the early sym-
petalous corolla justifies a position of the Spheno-
cleaceae near the Campanulales-Asterales, to which the
family is usually aligned, whereas it is separable from
these orders by the absence of a secondary pollen pre-
sentation mechanism. Secondary pollen presentation is
one of the characters that help to define the Cam-
panulales-Asterales complex. The family may be more
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-12-15.
primitive than the Campanulaceae and Gustafsson &
Bremer (1995) suggested that Sphenoclea does not
belong in or near the Asterales, but rather in the other
main branch of the Asteridae. The Angiosperm Phylo-
geny Group (led by K. Bremer, M.W. Chase & P.F. Ste-
vens) concluded in 1998 that the Sphenocleaceae,
together with the Convolvulaceae, Hydroleaceae, Montin-
iaceae and Solanaceae form the Solanales which belong
to the Euasterids I; this seems to be strongly supported
by molecular data.
8680000 SPHENOCLEA
Sphenoclea Gaertn., De fructibus et seminibus
plantarum 1: 113, t. 24/5 (1788) nom. cons.; Hemsl.: 480
(1877); Hepper: 307 (1963); Airy Shaw: 1 (1968);
Thulin: 1 (1973); C.D.K.Cook et al.: 533 (1974);
R. A. Dyer: 643 (1975); Thulin: 116 (1983); C.D.K.Cook:
217 (1990); Relief & P.RJ.Herman: 624 (1997). Type:
Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertn.
Characters of the family.
Two species have been described, namely S. zeylani-
ca Gaertn., which is almost pantropical but probably
introduced and naturalised in the Americas and southeast
Asia, and S. dalzielii N.E.Br. (1912) which is endemic to
West Africa from Senegal to the Central African
Republic. This species, like S. zeylanica, grows in wet
places, but is a straggly herb with sessile obovate-ellip-
tic leaves. The generic name Sphenoclea (Greek) is
derived from spheno (wedge-shaped, sphenoid) and kies
(abundance of), presumably referring to the flowers,
while the species name zeylanica refers to Ceylon (Sri
Lanka) where the type was collected. Common name:
soapweed; Clark 482 (PRE).
Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertn., De fructibus et
seminibus plantarum 1: 113, t. 24/5 (1788); Hemsl.: 481
(1877); Hepper: 307, t. 272 (1963); Roessler: 138
(1966); Airy Shaw: 1, t. 1 (1968); Thulin: 2, t.l (1973);
Thulin: 116, t. 20 (1983); C.D.K.Cook: 363, t. 367
(1996); Retief & P.P.J. Herman: 624 (1997). Type:
Ceylon, collector unknown (L, holo.).
Roots numerous, long, cord-like, tenuous, orange.
Stems stout, hollow, erect, up to 1.5 m tall, often much
branched. Leaves pale grey-green, linear-lanceolate to
oblong-lanceolate, base attenuate, apex acute to obtuse,
up to 50 x 150 mm; petiole up to 30 mm long. Spikes
cylindrical-conical, ± 10 mm diam. and up to 120 mm
long, but usually much shorter, narrowed at apex; pedun-
cle up to 80 mm long. Bracts and bracteoles spathulate
to oblanceolate-spathulate, tips arched over flowers
except at anthesis. Flowers densely crowded, though
usually only a few open at a time, rhomboid or hexago-
32
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 1. — Sphenoclea zeylanica
Gaertn. A, habit; B, part of
flowering branch; C, rachis of
inflorescence, showing scars
left by fallen capsules; D,
bract; E, bracteole; F, flower
bud, apical view; G, bud
beginning to open, side view;
H, flower, showing opening
corolla, oblique view; I, gyno-
ecium and calyx, with two
sepals removed, showing cu-
neate base; J, corolla opened
out; K, stamen; L, fruit partly
dehisced; M, t/s fmit; N, seed.
B, N, Milne -Redhead. & Taylor
7463; F, M, Jones FH1 18808;
K, Deighton 132a. A, x 0.2;
B, x 0.9; C-J, L, M, x 5.2; K,
X 10.4; N, x 52. Artist: Olive
Milne -Redhead. Reproduced
with permission of the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
nal by compression, sessile, wedge-shaped below,
attached longitudinally to rachis by a linear base. Calyx
lobes grey, broadly triangular, apex obtuse, 1 .0-1.5 mm
long, ultimately slightly accrescent and connivent.
Corolla green, tinged white, yellow, mauve or occasion-
ally purple, ± 4 mm across; lobes 2-4 mm long, ovate-
triangular, obtuse or acute, united about half-way, con-
nivent. Filaments shorter than anthers; anthers ±0.5 mm
long. Ovary obovoid, 1 .5-2.5 mm long, apex broad, free,
truncate. Capsule 4-5 mm diam., dehiscing below calyx
lobes, leaving scarious base persistent on rachis. Seeds
yellowish brown, ± 0.5 mm long. Figure 1.
In Africa S. zeylanica is widespread south of the
Sahara (excluding the NE Horn), extending south to
northern Namibia, northern Botswana, Swaziland and
also eastern Mpumalanga and northern KwaZulu-Natal in
South Africa. Also recorded from Madagascar. Figure 2.
It is autogamous but perhaps also sometimes pollinat-
ed by insects. The seeds are dispersed in muddy water
and probably also by other means such as in the mud
stuck to the feet of birds. In southern Africa, S. zeylani-
ca has been recorded on black clay soil, greyish brown
sandy clay-loam and also orange-grey sandy loam. It is
common in swampy areas, in wet or dry mud on the mar-
gins of periodically inundated depressions and flood
plains; it is often found along the banks of water courses
such as tidal creeks and irrigation channels, also in still,
shallow pools. It can be seasonally submerged, emergent
or temporarily terrestrial and can tolerate brackish water.
S. zeylanica has been recorded from grassland and also
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
33
among Acacia trees; it can be browsed by animals e.g.
zebra. It is often gregarious, becoming a troublesome
weed in rice fields, but it is also cultivated; young plants
are eaten as a vegetable in Java (Indonesia). It grows
from about sea level to 1 500 m altitude. Flowering and
fruiting time: Dec. to May in southern Africa.
Vouchers: Clark 482 (PRE); Giess 15101 (PRE, WIND); Pooley
1609 (NU, PRE); Smith 3710 (PRE, SRGH); Van der Schijff 2593
(KNP, PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The referees are thanked for valuable comments. Ms
H. Snyman is thanked for providing the distribution map,
through the MAPPIT programme of the NBI. The
Director, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew is thanked for
permission to reproduce Figure 1.
REFERENCES
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertn. in South
Africa.
AIRY SHAW, H.K. 1948. Sphenocleaceae. Flora malesiana, ser.1,4:
27, 28.
AIRY SHAW, H.K. 1968. Sphenocleaceae. Flora of tropical East Afri-
ca: 1-3.
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. 1998. An ordinal classifica-
tion for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri
botanical garden 85: 531-553.
BROWN, N.E. 1912. Diagnoses africanae XLIX. Kew Bulletin 1912:
270-283.
COOK, C.D.K., GUT, B.J., RIX, E.M., SCHNELLER, J. & SEITZ, M.
1974. Water plants of the world: 533, 534. Junk, The Hague.
COOK, C.D.K. 1990. Aquatic plant book : 216, 217. SPB Academic
Publishing, The Hague.
COOK, C.D.K. 1996. Aquatic and wetland plants of India: 363. Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
COSNER, M E., JANSEN, R.K. & LAMMERS, T.G. 1994. Phylo-
genetic relationships in the Campanulales based on rbch
sequences. Plant systematics and evolution 190: 79-95.
CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering
plants, edn 2. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
DAHLGREN, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and
macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 119-149.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants 1 :
643. Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
ERBAR, C. 1995. On the floral development of Sphenoclea zeylanica
(Sphenocleaceae, Campanulales) — SEM investigations on her-
barium material. Botanische Jahrbiicher 1 17: 469^483.
GAERTNER, J. 1788. De fructibus et seminibus plantarum 1: 113, t.
24/5. Academia Carolinae, Stuttgart.
GUSTAFSSON, M.H.G. & BREMER, K. 1995. Morphology and phy-
logenetic interrelationships of the Asteraceae, Calyceraceae,
Campanulaceae, Goodeniaceae and related families (Asterales).
American Journal of Botany 82: 250-265.
HEMSLEY, W.B. 1877. Sphenoclea. Flora of tropical Africa 3: 480,
481.
HEPPER, F.N. 1963. Sphenocleaceae. Flora of West tropical Africa ,
edn 2,2: 307-309.
MONOD, T.H. 1980. A propos du Sphenoclea zeylanica (Spheno-
cleaceae). Adansonia, ser. 2,20: 147-164.
RETIEF, E. & HERMAN, P.P.J. 1997. Plants of the northern provinces
of South Africa: key and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6: 624.
ROESSLER, H. 1966. Sphenocleaceae. Prodromus einer Flora von
Siidwestafrika 138: 1.
SUBRAMANYAM, K. 1950. A contribution to our knowledge of the
systematic position of the Sphenocleaceae. Proceedings of the
Indian Academy of Science B3 1,1: 60-65.
THULIN, M. 1973. Sphenocleaceae. Flore d'Afrique centrale: 1-5.
THUL1N, M. 1983. Sphenocleaceae. Flora zambesiaca 7,1: 114—117.
Bothalia 30,1: 35-42 (2000)
Taxonomic studies in the Aizoaceae from South Africa: three new
species and some new combinations
C. KLAK*
Keywords: Aizoaceae, new species, new combinations. South Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Two new species of Brownanthus, B. glareicola Klak and B. fraternus Klak and one new species of Scopelogena , S.
bruynsii Klak are described. S. gracilis L.Bolus is reduced to synonymy under S. verruculata (L.) L.Bolus. Three new com-
binations are made: Antimima excedens (L.Bolus) Klak, Erepsia dunensis (Sond.) Klak and Hammeria meleagris (L. Bolus)
Klak and full synonomy is given. Lampranthus maximilianii (Schltr. & A. Berger) L.Bolus is transferred back to Braunsia
maximilianii (Schltr. & A. Berger) Schwantes and the identity of Ruschia polita L.Bolus is discussed. The taxonomic posi-
tion of Mesembryanthemum purpureostylum L.Bolus is clarified.
Antimima N.E.Br.
This genus was described by N.E. Brown (1930) and
later amended by Dehn (1989). Recently about 100 spe-
cies were moved from Ruschia Schwantes to Antimima
(Hartmann 1998a). However, no revision of the species
is available. Although species of Ruschia and Antimima
were for many years included in one genus, they are
thought to be unrelated, due to differences in the mor-
phology of their respective capsules. Antimima has cap-
sules of the Leipoldtia type. These have relatively large,
stalked closing bodies, which is considered to be an apo-
morphy for the Leipoldtia group (Hartmann 1991).
Whereas all other genera with a Leipoldtia type of fruit
are multilocular, capsules of Antimima are always 5-loc-
ular. As a consequence of this circumscription of
Antimima , a further species is now moved from Ruschia
to Antimima.
Antimima excedens ( L.Bolus ) Klak, comb. nov.
Ruschia excedens L.Bolus, Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied
genera part 3: 278 (1954). Type: South Africa, Vanrhynsdorp Div.,
Knersvlakte, Sept. 1950, Meyer SUG12505, sheet 3 (BOL, lecto , here
designated).
Braunsia Schwantes
Braunsia is a small genus of about four or five species
which is thought to be related to the Lampranthus group
(Hartmann 1991). The echinate seeds and leaves that are
fused for a quarter to half of their length, with white, car-
tilagenous margins, were so far considered to be the main
characteristics of the genus.
The lack of echinate seeds in one of the species,
Braunsia maximilianii, prompted L. Bolus (1965) to
place it rather in Lampranthus N.E.Br., which never has
echinate seeds. This view stood in contrast to the earlier
opinion of N.E. Brown (1929). He considered the pres-
* Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, Cape
Town, e-mail: klak@botzoo.uct.ac.za
MS. received: 1999-04-08.
ence or absence of echinate seeds to be unimportant in
terms of the genus boundaries, since he had noticed that
this character is found in completely unrelated taxa.
Recent investigations now confirm the views of
Brown. Apart from the morphology of the flowers and
leaves, which are typical for Braunsia, the morphology
of the capsules excludes this species from Lampranthus.
In contrast to Lampranthus, where the expanding keels
always diverge from the base, those of Braunsia are par-
allel for most of their length and only diverge towards
the tips. In addition, the covering membranes in
Lampranthus are always complete and more or less firm,
often with additional closing devices below the covering
membranes. In Braunsia the covering membranes only
cover the locules partly, are fairly flexible and do not
have any additional closing devices. The capsules of
Lampranthus maximilianii were found to be typical of
species of Braunsia in all these details. Therefore the
older name, Braunsia maximilianii is re-instated here.
Braunsia maximilianii (Schltr. & A. Berger) Schwant.
in Gartenwelt 32: 644 (1928a).
Mesembryanthemum maximiliani Schltr. & A. Berger: 633 (1922).
Echinus maximilianii (Schltr. & A. Berger) N.E.Br.: 57 (1929).
Lampranthus maximilianii (Schltr. & A. Berger) L.Bolus: 172 (1965).
Type: Pakhuisberg, 12 Aug. 1897, Schlechter 10817 (B, holo.; BOL!,
GRA!).
Mesembryanthemum apiculatum var. mutica L.Bolus: 149 (1913).
Type: Gifberg, Sept. 1911, Phillips 7664 (BOL, holo.!).
M. phillipsii L.Bolus: 5 (1925). Type: Schlechter 10817 (B; BOL!,
holo.; GRA!, iso.).
M. binum L.Bolus: t. 263 (1927), non N.E.Br. Type: Vanrhynsdorp,
Rood NBG1 249/23 (BOL, holo.).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Plateau,
(-DC), Acocks 14897 (BOL); plateau between Matsikamma and
Gifberg, (-DC), Esterhuysen 30750 (BOL); Nardouw, (-DD), L. Bolus
s.n. (BOL); Cederberg, Kraaibosberg, (-DD), Klak 437 (BOL). 3119
(Calvinia): top of Vanrhyn’s Pass, (-AC), Esterhuysen 7773 (BOL);
entrance to Oorlog’s Kloof, (-AC), L. Bolus BH 19232 (BOL);
36
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 1. — Epidermal surface of Brownanthus. A-C: stems; E-G, leaves. A, E, B. glareicola, Klak 457 ; B, F, B. corallinus , Klak 64, C, G, B.
fraternus, Klak 171 . D, H, seeds of Brownanthus. D, B. glareicola, Klak 457\ H, B. fraternus, Klak 171. Scale bars: B, F, 200 pm; A, C,
E, G, H, 250 pm; D, 500 pm.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
37
Nieuwoudtville, (-AC), E.E. Galpin s.n., (BOL). 3218 (Clanwilliam):
northeast of Pakhuis Pass, (-BB), Esterhuysen 32202 (BOL).
Note : the name ‘maximilianii’ is spelt here with ‘ii’
since ‘Maximilian’ is assumed not to be a latinized name
and therefore ‘maximiliani’ needs to be corrected by
adding an ‘i’ (ICBN Art. 60.11).
Brownanthus Schwantes
Broxvnanthus is one of 11 genera placed in the sub-
family Mesembryanthemoideae. Apart from Psilocaulon
N.E.Br., Aptenia N.E.Br. and Aspazoma N.E.Br., it is one
of the few genera in the Aizoaceae in which stem succu-
lence has developed (Bittrich 1986). At present ten
species are recognised (Pierce & Gerbaulet 1997). The
main characteristics of the genus are that the sepals re-
main upright throughout anthesis, the white or cream-
coloured flowers never possess any filamentous stami-
nodes and the lower part of the capsule is shallowly
bowl-shaped (Ihlenfeldt & Bittrich 1985). Recent explora-
tion in Western Cape has brought two new species to
light both of which can unambiguously be placed in
Brownanthus.
Brownanthus fraternus Klak, sp. nov., a B. coral-
lino foliis minus papillosis manifeste, seminibus grandi-
oribus cum tumore hilari differt.
TYPE.- — Western Cape, 3420 (Bredasdorp): west of
Swellendam, (-AA), Klak 171 (BOL, holo.; K).
Dwarf shrub, decumbent to erect, 150-400 mm high,
500 mm wide. Branches articulated, green, succulent,
becoming woody with age towards bases; internodes
cylindrical, 2. 5-8.0 x 3. 5-4.0 mm, epidermal bladder
cells xeromorphic, ± isodiametric (Figure 1C). Leaves
deciduous, up to 9 mm long, flattened above, convex
below, free towards bases, with mesomorphic epidermal
bladder cells without hair-like extensions (Figure 1G).
Calyx with 5 lobes; lobes shortly connate and erect dur-
ing anthesis. Flowers solitary, borne at tip of stem, 24
mm diam. Staminodes: petaloid staminodes white to
cream-coloured, free to bases, recurving over calyx
lobes; filamentous staminodes absent. Ovary semi-inferi-
or; placentation axile. Fruit a hygrochastic capsule, 5-
locular, 5-7 mm diam., valve wings inflexed' over
expanded valves, seed bags absent. Seeds dark brown, D-
shaped, 1.4- 1.5 mm long, without crest, testa with raised
central papillae, with hilar bulge (Figure 1H). Flowering
time: December.
Distribution and ecology: Bredasdorp and Swellendam
Districts (Figure 2); on quartz patches overlaying clay or
on gravelly shale slopes; winter rainfall up to 400 mm.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE.— 3419 (Caledon): 10 km north of Napier,
(-BD), Bruyns 6844 (BOL), Klak 275 (NBG); 2 km north of Napier,
(-BD), Bruyns & Klak 7807 (K). 3420 (Bredasdorp): west of
Swellendam, (-AA), Klak 171 (BOL, holo.; K).
The habit, floral morphology and, in particular, the
epidermal features of the stem of B. fraternus (Figure
1C) are very similar to those of B. corallinus (Thunb.)
Ihlenf. & Bittrich (Figure IB), but the former may be dis-
tinguished by its less papillate leaves (Figure 1G). The
most conspicuous difference lies in the seeds where there
is a hilar bulge in B. fraternus (Figure 1H), which is
absent in B. corallinus.
B. fraternus is known from three localities between
Swellendam and Bredasdorp, where it appears to be
under threat from agricultural activities. This is much
further south than any other Brownanthus and it is the
only species of Brownanthus which grows on the coastal
plains south of the Langeberg. The nearest locality of its
closest relative, B. corallinus, is over 300 km to the
northwest at the southern end of Namaqualand. The
widespread, but less closely related B. ciliatus, is found
no nearer than 100 km away from B. fraternus.
Brownanthus glareicola Klak, sp. nov., a B.
corallino habitu parviore compactiore, pagina caulium
hirta, foliis minus papillosis manifeste supra concavis
infra convexis foliis junioribus imbricatis, seminibus
cristatis distinguenda est.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): south-
west of Vanrhynsdorp, (-DA), Klak 457 (BOL, holo.; K).
Dwarf, erect shrub up to 170 mm high, 250 mm wide.
Stems articulated, green, succulent, becoming slightly
woody with age towards bases; internodes cylindrical,
3. 5-5. 5 x 3. 5-4. 5 mm, epidermal bladder cells xero-
morphic with hair-like extensions (Figure 1A). Leaves
deciduous, up to 3-5 mm long, concave above, convex
below, overlapping at bases, epidermal bladder cells
mesomorphic without hair-like extensions (Figure IE).
Calyx with 5 lobes; lobes shortly connate and erect
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Brownanthus glareicola, ▼; B. coralli-
nus, ■; B. fraternus, •.
38
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
during anthesis. Flowers solitary at tips of stems, 10-15
mm diam. Staminodes : petaloid staminodes white to
cream-coloured, free to bases, recurving over calyx
lobes; filamentous staminodes absent. Ovary semi-infe-
rior; placentation axile. Fruit a hygrochastic capsule, 5-
locular, (4-)5-6 mm diam., valve wings inflexed over
expanded valves, without seed bags. Seeds brown, D-
shaped, 1.3-1. 5 mm long, with a crest, hilar bulge
absent, testa cells slightly raised (Figure ID). Flowering
time : October.
Distribution and ecology : Knersvlakte, southwest of
Vanrhynsdorp (Figure 2); flat to gently sloping patches
of quartz gravel on clay; winter rainfall, 100-200 mm
per year.
Etymology, glareicola = gravel dweller.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): southwest of
Vanrhynsdorp, (-DA), Klak 457 (BOL, holo.; K); gypsum mine,
(-DA), Klak 458 (BOL).
The material upon which the description is based,
comes from a locality south of Vanrhynsdorp, where the
plants were first noticed by A. Ellis and P. Desmet in
1996. The species had previously been misidentified as
Brownanthus corallinus and grows together with it in
one of the known localities. The new species is distinct-
ly smaller and more compact in growth than B. coralli-
nus and the older stems are only slightly woody towards
their bases. It also differs from B. corallinus (Figure IB)
by the hair-like epidermal cells which cover the stems
(Figure 1A). Furthermore, the bladder cell idioblasts of
the leaves are noticeably more reduced in size compared
to the ones in B. corallinus and the bases of young leaves
overlap, which is never found in B. corallinus (Figure
IE, F). In addition, the leaves in B. corallinus are sub-
cylindrical, whereas in B. glareicola they are convex
below and concave above. Further differences may be
found in the seeds. These have a conspicuous crest in B.
glareicola, which is not known for any other species of
Brownanthus (Figure ID).
Whereas B. corallinus is known from numerous local-
ities over a distance of about 250 km in Namaqualand, B.
glareicola appears to be much rarer and is known from
only two localities in the southern Knersvlakte (Figure
2). In all of these it grows on patches of flat to gently
sloping quartz gravel.
Erepsia N.E.Br.
Erepsia was revised by Liede (1989). Characteristics
separating it from the closely allied genus Lampranthus
N.E.Br., are the triquetrous leaves with tough epidermis
and the presence of a hypanthium. Liede (1989) subdi-
vided the genus into four sections, three of which share
flowers with vertical hypanthium walls and leaves usual-
ly less than 5 mm diam. The remaining section, Crassi-
foliae, consists of seven species in which the walls of the
hypanthium are sloped outwards and the leaves are most-
ly fairly thick (5-10 mm diam.).
Recently, plants of the very rare Lampranthus dunen-
sis were rediscovered on the Cape Flats. This species was
described as Mesembryanthemum dunense by Sonder
(1862). In Jacobsen (1960), L. Bolus moved it to Lam-
pranthus and placed it in the informal section Reptantes.
An examination of the flowers of this material showed
that they differ from those found in all species of
Lampranthus, in that they possess a conspicuous, out-
wardly sloped hypanthium. In addition, the broad, tri-
quetrous leaves with tough epidermis are typical of
species placed in Erepsia section Crassifoliae. This fea-
ture, together with the noticable triquetrous leaves suggest
that L. dunensis belongs in Erepsia. The leaves are 4-6
mm broad and fall within the limits included by Liede in
Sect. Crassifoliae. It is now transferred to Erepsia.
Erepsia dunensis (Sond.) Klak, comb. nov.
Mesembryanthemum dunense Sond., Flora capensis 2 : 411 (1862).
Lampranthus dunensis (Sond.) L. Bolus in Jacobsen: 1197 (1960).
Syntypes: Western Cape, seashore near Cape Town, Ecklon s.n.. Pappe
s.n. (TCD, lecto.!, here designated; S).
Mesembryanthemum macrocalyx Kensit: 153 (1909). Type: Western
Cape, Skurfkop near Somerset West, Nov. 1907, Pillans 1423 (BOL,
holo.).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Cape Town): Sandvlei, (-AB), L. Bolus
18590 (BOL); Klipfontein Road, (-AB), Maytham s.n. (BOL); north-
west of Fish Hoek, (-AB), Pillans 3626 (BOL); Zeekoevlei, (-AB),
Starke s.n. (BOL); Wolfgat Nature Reserve, (-BB), Klak 453 (BOL).
Hammeria P.M.Burgoyne
Hammeria was recently established for two species
from the Ceres Karoo. The type of the genus is Ham-
meria salteri (L.Bolus) RM.Burgoyne, with Ruschia salteri
L. Bolus as its basionym (Burgoyne et al. 1998). Even
more recently Hartmann (1998b) published a new name,
Lampranthus tanquanus H.E.K. Hartmann, based on the
same type, without reference to the earlier publication of
Burgoyne et al. (1998).
The absence of closing bodies and the presence of
valve wings were the reasons for excluding Ruschia
salteri from Ruschia. Burgoyne et al. (1998) suggested
morphological similarities to Antimima, Cheiridopsis
and Chasmatophyllum, but were unable to place R.
salteri into any of the existing genera. Hartmann (1998b)
noted correctly that the fruits resembled those of the
Titanopsis type, with thin, flexible, covering membranes
bending down into the empty locules, and almost com-
plete covering membranes. In addition, the locules are
shallow, so that the lower part of the capsule is bowl-
shaped. In contrast, fruits of Lampranthus are always
deep, ± funnel-shaped, with firm, complete covering
membranes and often additional closing devices below
the covering membranes. It is therefore not possible for
this species to remain in Lampranthus. From the capsule
morphology, it appears more likely that closer relation-
ships may be found with species placed in the Titanopsis
or the Stomatium group. A closer study of this complex
is needed before it can be decided whether Hammeria
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
39
may be included in one of the existing genera or indeed
deserves generic status.
However, it has so far been overlooked that the same
species was named several times by L. Bolus. Since one
of these names predates R. salteri , a new combination
and synonomy are necessary.
Hammeria meleagris ( L.Bolus ) Klak, comb. nov.
Mesembryanthemum meleagris L.Bolus, in Notes on Mesem-
brianthemum and allied genera, part 2: 17 (1928). Lampranthus melea-
gris (L.Bolus) L.Bolus: 169 (1939). Type: South Africa, Western Cape,
Ceres Div., near Karoopoort, Sept. 1928, Pillans 6130 (BOL, holo. !).
Lampranthus longisepalus L.Bolus: 169 (1939). Mesembryanthemum
longisepalum L.Bolus: 198 (1930). Type: Western Cape, between
Karoopoort and Calvinia, Jan. 1930, Leipoldt BOL19135 (BOL, holo.!).
Ruschia salteri L.Bolus: 371 (1932b). Hammeria salteri (L.Bolus)
P.M.Burgoyne et al.: 206 (1998). Lampranthus tanquanus H.E.K. Hart-
mann: 70 (1998b). Type: South Africa, Western Cape, beyond Karoo-
poort near the road to Sutherland, 3 Aug. 1932, Salter 2668 (BOL,
lecto.!).
Lampranthus stoloniferus L.Bolus: 307 (1965). Type: South Africa,
Western Cape, Sutherland Div., 55 miles east of Karoopoort, June
1965, F.J. Stayner KG214/65 (BOL, holo.!).
Scopelogena L.Bolus
Mesembryanthemum verruculatum was already
known to Linnaeus and had been introduced to England
in the early 1730’s (Dillenius 1732). L. Bolus later
placed this species in Lampranthus (Bolus 1950). The
plant, however, could be separated from Lampranthus by
the apparent lack of valve wings and the fact that the cap-
sules do not close completely once they have opened. On
the other hand it differs from Ruschia by the absence of
closing bodies and by the yellow colour of the petals.
These reasons prompted L. Bolus to establish a new
genus, Scopelogena, in 1962 for this species. At the same
time she described a second species of Scopelogena , S.
gracilis L.Bolus (1962).
S. verruculata is known only from the Cape Peninsula,
whereas S. gracilis was described from Grootvadersbosch,
east of Swellendam. The latter was said to differ from S.
verruculata by the more slender, sometimes obtusely
keeled, often laterally compressed leaves, with the capsule
obconical inside and not angled. Newly collected material
from west and south of Swellendam has shown that none
of these characters consistently separate S. verruculata
from S. gracilis and that they are conspecific. S. verrucu-
lata is distributed from Cape Town sporadically eastwards
to Herbertsdale, usually occurring on exposed, locally
arid, sandstone outcrops.
These investigations have also shown that, contrary to
previous descriptions (Bolus 1962), newly ripened cap-
sules which were opened for the first time possessed very
narrow, ‘seam-like’ valve wings. -In most of the old cap-
sules this character is no longer visible and this might
explain the fact that it was not mentioned in previous
descriptions.
Recent exploration has brought to light a second
species, which occurs further north of the distribution
area of S. verruculata. This is now described. Despite the
large size of the plant, this species has so far been over-
looked by most collectors. It is named after P.V. Bruyns,
who was the first to notice it in Namaqualand in 1992.
Scopelogena bruynsii Klak, sp. nov., a S. verrucu-
lata floribus parvioribus luteis ad roseis salmoneisve,
praesentia staminodiorum filamentosorum, fructibus re-
petite claudentibus discedit.
TYPE. — South Africa, Western Cape, Namaqualand,
3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 10 km north of Nuwerus, (-AB),
Klak & Bruyns 462, (BOL, holo.; K).
Woody shrub up to 0.3 m high, 1 m wide, with stout,
erect or spreading grey to brown stems. Leaves crowded,
shortly connate, incurved, erect, 3-angled to cylindrical,
up to 45 x 5-8 mm, bluntish, shortly mucronate, soft,
whitish grey to slightly reddish. Calyx with 5 subequal
lobes. Flowers in much-branched inflorescence; pedicels
4-11 mm long; bracts up to 15 x 11 mm. Staminodes :
petaloid staminodes in 1 series; filamentous staminodes
present, conically collected, papillate at bases; yellow,
salmon or pale pink. Stamens erect, outer stamens papil-
late up to middle; anthers yellow; filaments same colour
as staminodes. Nectaries in crenulate ring. Ovary semi-
inferior; stigmas filiform, shorter than tallest stamens;
placentation parietal. Fruit a hygrochastic capsule,
ochre, relatively soft and not woody, 5-locular, 3. 0-4. 5
mm diam., top convex, lower part deep, funnel-shaped,
with very narrow valve wings when young, covering
membranes present, almost completely covering locules,
with fine ridge below covering membrane, expanding
keels diverging, without closing body. Seeds dark brown,
obovate, tuberculate, 1.0-1. 1 mm long. Flowering time:
September and October.
Distribution and ecology : Namaqualand to Clan-
william and Ceres Karoo (Figure 3); on low, sandstone
cliffs; in areas receiving winter rainfall of 100-200 mm.
Specimens examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3018 (Kamiesberg): near Leeukuil, (-DC),
Bruyns 5267a (BOL).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3 1 1 8 (Vanrhynsdorp): 1 0 km north of Nuwe-
rus, (-AB), Klak & Bruyns 462, (BOL, holo.; K); Matsikamma, (-DB),
Helm 1656 (BOL). 3119 (Calvinia): Soutpan, (-CD), Klak 568 (BOL).
3219 (Wuppertal): Dassiekloof, (-BA), Klak 424 (BOL); south of
Elandsvlei, (-DA), Klak 565 (BOL), Van Jaarsveld 13579 (BOL).
Scopelogena verruculata (L.) L.Bolus in Journal
of South African Botany 28: 9 (1962).
Mesembryanthemum verruculatum L.: 486 (1753). Lampranthus ver-
ruculatus (L.) L.Bolus: 385 (1950). Ruschia verruculata (L.)
G.D. Rowley: 9 (1978). Iconotype: Dill., Hort. Eltham. t. 203, fig. 259
(1732).
Scopelogena gracilis L.Bolus: 10 (1962). Ruschia scopelogena
G. D. Rowley: 9 (1978). Type: Western Cape, Grootvadersbos, Dec. 1958,
H. Hall 1506 (BOL, holo.!).
40
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Scopelogena verruculata , •; and
Scopelogena bruynsii, Y.
Woody shrub up to 0.3 m high, 2 m wide, with stout,
erect or spreading, grey to brown stems. Leaves crowd-
ed, shortly connate, incurved, erect, 3-angled to cylindri-
cal, obtuse, up to 16-50 x 3-5 mm, shortly mucronate,
very soft, grass green to grey or sometimes reddish.
Calyx of 5 subequal lobes. Flowers in much-branched
inflorescence; pedicels 4-15 mm long; bracts up to 15 x
15 mm. Staminod.es : petaloid staminodes in 1 or 2 series,
yellow rarely white; no filamentous staminodes observ-
ed. Stamens erect, outer stamens dorsally papillate up to
middle, inner ventrally papillate at middle; anthers and
filaments yellow. Nectaries in crenulate ring. Ovary
semi-inferior; stigmas filiform, longer than stamens; pla-
centation parietal. Fruit a hygrochastic capsule, not fully
closing again once opened, ochre, relatively soft, not
woody, 5-locular, 5-9 mm diam., top convex, lower part
deep, funnel-shaped, with very narrow valve wings when
young, covering membranes incomplete to almost com-
plete, with inconspicuous ridge below covering mem-
brane, expanding keels diverging, without closing body.
Seeds dark brown, obovate, tuberculate, 1. 1-1.2 mm
long. Flowering time : September-October.
Distribution and ecology: Cape Peninsula to
Riversdale (Figure 3); on sandstone cliffs, with winter
rainfall of 300-600 mm annually.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): rocks west of Lion’s
Head, (-CD), Hall s.n. (BOL); Table Mountain, (-CD), Klak 318
(BOL), Marloth 2851 (BOL); Lion’s Head, (-CD), Wolley Dod 2420
(BOL). 3419 (Caledon): 10 km N of Napier, Karsrivier, (-BD), Klak
278 (BOL). 3420 (Bredasdorp): 7 km W of Swellendam, (-AB), Klak
177 (BOL); Grootvadersbos, (-BB), Hall 1506 (BOL); Boskloof,
Potberg, (-BC), Burgers 1627 (NBG). 3421 (Riversdale): Glen Leith,
(-AA), Muir 4320 (BOL).
S. verruculata and S. bruynsii are morphologically
very similar and there appears to be no doubt that this
new species belongs in Scopelogena. This is dispite the
fact that in the new species the capsules open and close
repeatedly. Consequently one of the main distinctions of
Scopelogena (that the capsules remain open) falls away.
Similar variability in this feature is also found in species
of Aridaria (Gerbaulet 1996). The flowers of S. bruynsii
may be yellow, pink or salmon-pink. S. verruculata has
predominantly yellow or rarely white flowers.
S. bruynsii is found over a wide area, from Nuwerus
to Clanwilliam and eastwards to the Ceres Karoo. The
plants are always found growing on low sandstone cliffs.
The character combinations present in Scopelogena
do not suggest clear affinities to any other genus in the
Ruschiodeae and, consequently the relationships of Sco-
pelogena need further study.
The correct identity of Mesembryanthemum purpureo-
stylum L. Bolus
In recent literature, much confusion has arisen over
the correct identity of Mesembryanthemum purpureosty-
lum L. Bolus. The type was based on a collection from
Bonnievale. L. Bolus later included this name in the syn-
onymy of Ruschia forficata (L.) L. Bolus. Bruyns (1997)
was the first to notice that in fact two different species
were involved: R. forficata (L.) L. Bolus was found to be
a synonym of Erepsia forficata (L.) Schwantes. Based on
the presence of closing bodies and the absence of valve
wings, Bruyns (1997) transferred M. purpureostylum to
Ruschia , but, shortly afterwards, it was moved to Acro-
don by Burgoyne (1998). In the same year, Hartmann
(1998b) published a new combination in Cerochlamys
based on the type of M. purpureostylum L. Bolus, how-
ever, without reference to any of these recent publica-
tions.
The absence of a capsule on the type poses some dif-
ficulties for the correct position of this species. However,
a watercolour painting of the type specimen exists in the
Bolus Herbarium (by M. Page) and this shows the habit,
as well as the leaves and flowers. From this it is obvious
that the flowers have their filamentous staminodes and
stamens collected into a central cone, with the filamen-
tous staminodes overtopping the stamens and partly con-
cealing them. This arrangement is found in numerous
other genera such as Ruschia and Antimima, but in none
of the other species of Cerochlamys. In Cerochlamys the
filamentous staminodes are loosely arranged in a cylin-
der around the stamens, sometimes with the outer ones
spreading horizontally (Hartmann 1998b: 51, t. 16, 18,
20). The flower of Acrodon purpureostylus shown by
Burgoyne matches that of the type. Hartmann, on the
other hand, makes no mention of this typical cone flower.
In addition, Hartmann did not find any closing bodies
in the capsules of the two collections which she cited.
Both Bruyns and Burgoyne mention the presence of clos-
ing bodies in their collections. Both Bruyns’ and
Burgoyne’s collections agree with the illustration of the
type in all details of habit, leaves and flowers. It can
therefore only be deduced that Hartmann must have
based her conclusions on misidentified material.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
41
From the characteristics found to be typical of
Acrodon (Hartmann 1996), Burgoyne (1998) showed con-
clusively that the species should be placed in Acrodon
and no reasons have been put forward to alter this. A
complete list of synonyms is given below.
Acrodon purpureostylus ( L.Bolus ) P.M. Burgoyne
in Aloe 35: 60 (1998).
Mesembryanthemum purpureostylum L.Bolus: 6 ( 1920). Erepsia pur-
pureostyla (L.Bolus) Schwantes: 68 (1928b). Ruschia purpureostyla
(L.Bolus) P.V.Bruyns: 41 (1997). Cerochlamys purpureostyla (L.Bolus)
H.E.K. Hartmann: 56 (1998b). Type: South Africa, Bonnievale,
Mathews sub NBG3426/15 , sheet 2 (BOL, lecto., here designated).
The identity of Ruschia polita L.Bolus
Until now much uncertainty has existed about the
identity of Ruschia polita L.Bolus, which was described
in 1932. The type specimen was collected by G. Nel at
Touws River in April 1930. Bolus was uncertain whether
this species belonged in Ruschia, as she placed a ques-
tion mark next to the genus in her text. The absence of
fruits on the type sheet may have added to the confusion.
Annotations on the type sheet suggest that it belongs
either in Corpuscularia or Antimima.
However, species placed in Corpuscularia are charac-
terised by a peculiar epidermis, which is made up of
tightly packed, dome-shaped epidermal bladder-cells.
The surface of R. polita, on the other hand, consists of
flattened cells and is completely smooth. In addition,
species of Corpuscularia have so far only been recorded
from a fairly small area around Port Elizabeth, in the
Eastern Cape. Thus, the difference in epidermal mor-
phology and the very disjunct distribution would suggest
that the type specimen of Ruschia polita is unlikely to
belong to Corpuscularia.
Exclusion of this species from Antimima and Ruschia
is more difficult since the type lacks any fruits.
Nevertheless, since Bolus did not mention the clustering
of filamentous staminodes into a dense cone, it seems
unlikely that it is either a species of Antimima or of
Ruschia.
A notable feature of the type specimen is, however, its
sharply keeled, thick leaves with cartilaginous margins.
This is typical of species placed in Braunsia. The
description of Braunsia geminata matches very closely
that of Ruschia polita, both with respect to the morphol-
ogy of the leaves as well as the flowers. In addition, the
distribution of B. geminata extends from the Ceres
Karoo to Prince Albert and the Little Karoo and so the
type locality of R. polita falls within this area. Thus it is
reasonable to conclude that R. polita is conspecific with
B. geminata.
Braunsia geminata (Haw.) L.Bolus in Journal of
South African Botany 33: 306 (1967).
Ruschia polita L.Bolus: 332 (1932a); L.Bolus: 260 (1954). Type:
Laingsburg Dist.; Touw’s River, Apr. 1930, G. Nel SUG9095 (BOL,
holo.!).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was funded by the FRD, the Mesemb
Study Group and the American Cactus and Succulent
Society of America.
REFERENCES
BITTRICH, V. 1986. Untersuchungen zum Merkmalsbestand, Glie-
derung und Abgrenzung der Unterfamilie Mesembryanthe-
moideae (Mesembryanthemaceae Fenzl.). Mitteilungen aus
dem Institut fiir Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 21: 5-116.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1913. Mesembrianthemurn. Annals of the South Afri-
can Museum 9: 140-154.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1920. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Her-
barium 3: 6.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1925. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Her-
barium 4: 5.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1927. Mesembrianthemurn binum. The Flowering
Plants of South Africa 7: t. 263.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1928. Notes on Mesembrianthemurn and allied gen-
era, part 2: 17-32. Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1930. Notes on Mesembrianthemurn and allied gen-
era, part 2: 193-208. Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape
Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1932a. Notes on Mesembrianthemurn and allied gen-
era, part 2: 309-336. Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape
Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L 1932b. Notes on Mesembrianthemurn and allied gen-
era, part 2: 357-376. Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape
Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1939. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 139-188. Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape
Town
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1950. Lampranthus verruculatus (L.) L.Bolus. In R.S.
Adamson & T.M. Salter, Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta,
Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1954. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 237-288.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1962. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 28: 9-11.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1965. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 31 : 172, 307.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1967. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 33: 308, 309.
BROWN, N.E. 1929. New species and critical notes on Mesem-
bryanthemum and allied genera. Kew Bulletin 1929: 56-62.
BROWN, N.E. 1930. Mesembryanthemum. The Gardeners' Chronicle,
ser. 3, 87: 13-211.
BRUYNS, RV. 1997. A new combination in the genus Ruschia and the
correct name for ‘ Cynanchum capense' . South African Journal
of Botany 63: 241
BURGOYNE, RM. 1998. Finding a place in the sun: where does
Ruschia purpureostyla belong? Aloe 35: 60, 61.
BURGOYNE, P.M , SMITH, G.F. & CHESSELET, P. 1998. Ham-
meria, a new genus of Aizoaceae from South Africa. Cactus
and Succulent Journal (US) 70: 203-208.
DEHN, M. 1989. Untersuchungen zum Merkmalsbestand und zur Stel-
lung der Gattung Antimima N.E.Br. emend. Dehn (Mesem-
bryanthemaceae Fenzl.) Mitteilungen aus dem Institut fiir
Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 22: 189-215.
DILLENIUS, J.J. 1732. Hortus elthamensis: 268, t. 203, fig. 259.
Londini, sumptibus auctoris.
GERBAULET, M. 1996. Revision of the genus Aridaria N.E.Br.
(Aizoaceae). Botanische Jahrbiicher 118: 41-58.
GREUTER, W„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., CHALONER, W.G.,
DESMOULIN, V„ HAWKSWORTH, D.L., JORGENSEN,
PM., NICOLSON, D.H., SILVA, PC. TREHANE, P. &
MCNEILL, J. (eds). 1994: International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature, adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical
Congress, Yokohama, August-September 1993. Konigstein.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1991 . Mesembryanthema. In H P Linder & A.V.
Hall, Systematics, biology and evolution of some South African
taxa. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 13: 75-157.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1996. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes on
Aizoaceae. Bradleya 14: 29-56.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998a. New combinations in Antimima (Ruschi-
oideae, Aizoaceae) from southern Africa. Bothalia 28: 67-82.
42
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998b. New combinations in Ruschioideae,
based on studies in Ruschia (Aizoaceae). Bradleya 16: 44-91.
IHLENFELDT, H.-D. & BITTR1CH, V. 1985. Morphologic, Glieder-
ung und Abgrenzung der Gattung Psilocaulon N.E.Br. s.l. (Me-
sembryanthemaceae). Botanische Jahrbiicher 105: 289-322.
JACOBSEN, H. 1960. A handbook of succulent plants 3. London.
KENS1T, H.M.L. 1909. Contributions to the African flora. Transac-
tions of the Royal Society of South Africa 1: 153.
LIEDE, S. 1989. Untersuchungen zum Merkmalsbestand und zur
Taxonomie der Erepsiinae (Mesembryanthemaceae). Beitrdge
zur Biologie der Pflanzen 64: 391-479.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1: 486. Salvius, Stock-
holm.
PIERCE, S.M. & GERBAULET, M. 1997. Brownanthus Schwantes
(Mesembryanthemoideae, Aizoaceae): two new species and a
new combination from the Richtersveld and southwestern
Namibia. Aloe 37: 42^44.
ROWLEY, G. 1978. Reunion of some genera of Mesembryanthemaceae.
The National Cactus & Succulent Journal (UK) 33: 6-9.
SCHLECHTER, ERR. & BERGER, A. 1922. Mehrere neue Mesem-
brianthemum und eine Aloe. Botanische Jahrbiicher 57: 626-644.
SCHWANTES, G. 1928a. Braunsia. Gartenwelt 32: 644.
SCHWANTES, G. 1928b. Mesembriaceen unserer Kulturen in neuer
Benennung. Gartenflora 77: 68, 69.
SONDER, O.W. 1862. Mesembryanthemum. In W.H. Harvey & O.W.
Sonder, Flora capensis 2: 395^-60.
Bothalia 30,1: 43-55 (2000)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
AGAVACEAE
AGAVE VIVIPARA: A NATURALISED ALIEN IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
.invasive species are a kind of habitat destruction. When invasive
species take over a habitat, they erase the native richness and diversi-
ty of species. What we really need is an everyday concern among ordi-
nary people about biodiversity and the issue of invasiveness. '
— Dr Vandana Shiva in conversation with
IUCN’s Ricardo Bayon (1997-1998)
The indigenous succulent flora of southern Africa rep-
resents 55 mostly unrelated plant families and includes
all possible types of life forms. A small minority of exotic
succulents (24 species according to Smith et al. 1997)
can be regarded as naturalised in southern Africa. These
species are mostly representative of the Cactaceae (19
species) and, to a much lesser degree, the Basellaceae (1
species), Agavaceae (2 species) and Portulacaceae (2
species) (Smith et al. 1997). Some of the species of
Cactaceae, e.g. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill, (prickly
pear) and O. aurantiaca Lindl. (jointed cactus) are
aggressive noxious weeds that have invaded and trans-
formed certain parts of the southern African landscape.
In recent years, at least among urban gardeners, the
popularity of agavaceous taxa is seemingly on the
increase. The plants are being used as inexpensive, per-
manent barriers to ward off intruders. With their formid-
able spines, large and compact habit, drought resistance
and aggressive growing capability, they are ideally suit-
ed for this purpose. With the abandonment of habitations,
these hardy agaves can persist without human interven-
tion and subsequently become adventive aliens (Kloot
1987) in the local flora. One such species, Agave decipi-
ens Baker was recently recorded in South Africa (Smith
& Steyn 1999a). This paper deals with a comparable
alien, namely A. vivipara L. var. vivipara.
Agave vivipara. often known by one of its synonyms,
A. angustifolia Haw., is a variable species native to cen-
tral America (Gentry 1982; Forster 1992). It is thought
that the species was the wild ancestor of henequen (A.
fourcroydes Lem.), a cultivated species known world-
wide for the high quality of its fibres (Colunga-
GarclaMarin & May-Pat 1993; Colunga-GarcfaMarin et
al. 1999). Mr Bernard Ulrich (Pforzheim, Germany) has
in turn suggested to the second author that A. vivipara is
possibly a selected form of the widely cultivated A.
sisalana Perrine, source of sisal hemp. Currently, six
varieties, including the typical variety, and two cultivars
are recognised in A. vivipara (Forster 1992). According
to Gentry (1982), this species complex has the most
wide-ranging distribution of agaves in North America
(for a list of exsiccatae see Gentry 1982: 586-590). The
plants commonly occur in tropical savanna, thorn forest
and drought-deciduous tropical forests. However, the
species also survives in extreme habitats such as the arid
Sonoran Desert with about 250 mm rain per annum and
in montane pine-oak forests with a yearly precipitation of
1 680 mm. In these natural habitats, wild populations of
A. vivipara exhibit a gradient in morphological variation,
with characters such as plant size, length of leaves, dis-
tribution of marginal teeth and mass of leaf fibres show-
ing a high degree of plasticity. Also, improved growth
conditions in gardens result in an increase in leaf length
and fibre content and a decrease in thorniness (Colunga-
GarcfaMarin & May-Pat 1997).
Since pre-Hispanic times, wild populations of A.
vivipara have been prized by the inhabitants of central
America not only for their fibres — which are used for
hammocks, bags and fabrics — but also, the peduncles,
leaves, stems and roots are used for building material,
utensils, tools, food, fermented beverages and medicine
(Cruz-Ramos et al. 1985; Colunga-GarcfaMarin & May-
Pat 1993; Nobel 1994). With increasing attention being
paid to the utilisation of invasive aliens (Zimmermann &
Zimmermann 1987; Anon. 1988; Howell & Schnell
1991; Turksvykwekersvereniging 1997), southern Afri-
can environmentalists should take cognisance of the
Mexican ethnobotanical uses of A. vivipara with a view
to duplicating some of these practices locally.
The typical variety of A. vivipara is easy to distin-
guish from A. decipiens , the only species with which it
can be confused in southern Africa. Important morpho-
logical distinctions between the two taxa are given below
(Table 1).
TABLE 1. — Main morphological distinctions between Agave
decipiens and A. vivipara
44
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 1. — Agave vivipara var.
vivipara: A, habit, rosette 1.5
m tall; B, panicle 2 m tall.
C-F, protandrous flower: C,
bud; D, male phase; E,
female phase; F, longitudinal
section. G, distal part of leaf
showing straight margin and
hooked teeth. C-G, x 0.65.
Scale bar: 20 mm. All draw-
ings made from live material
collected by E.M.A. Steyn
and deposited under G.F.
Smith & E.M.A. Steyn 2
(PRE). Artist: G. Condy.
Agave vivipara var. vivipara is widely cultivated in
Australia and is listed as an established alien in the Flora
of Australia (Forster 1996). In South Africa this variety,
as well as the attractive A. vivipara cv. Marginata with its
yellow-edged leaves, is frequently cultivated (Smith &
Steyn 1999b). In urban Pretoria the typical variety has
recently been found as a garden escape in a few loca-
tions, for example on an open stand (Smith & Steyn
1999b) where the plants had possibly spread from garden
refuse dumped earlier, and along a roadside in eastern
Pretoria. In the latter location the colony was freely suck-
ering and spreading onto the broad shoulder of the road.
Some of the suckering plants were in flower and bulbils
were found on an older inflorescence which bore no fruit
(Figures 1 & 2A). However, a dried-out infructescence
with numerous seed-filled capsules on a dead plant in the
same colony showed that the plants are also capable of
sexual reproduction (Figure 2B). During germination
tests conducted by the first author, ± 80% of the large,
black seeds were viable. Similar patterns of distribution
and establishment of the species have been observed near
Cape Town and Port Elizabeth and Uitenhage, Eastern
Cape (Figure 3). A. vivipara var. vivipara has therefore
apparently progressed beyond the adventive stage of nat-
uralisation in South Africa and is currently becoming an
established alien (Kloot 1987) like A. americana L. and
A. sisalana (Smith & Mossmer 1996) in the local flora.
1219000-00014 Agave vivipara L. var. vivipara.
Species plantarum 1: 323 (1753). Type: Commelin, Prae-
ludia botanica 65, t. 15(1 703) [lectotypified by Wijnands
(1983)].
Agave angustifolia Haw. var. angustifolia: 72 (1812); Gentry: 559
(1982); Serna & Lopez-Ferrari: 9 (1993); Colunga-Marin & May-Pat:
1455 (1997). Type: St. Helena Island, cultivated. [Neotype: Tozzeti: 2,
t. 6 (1810), designated by Gentry: 560, t. 20.6 (1982)].
A. pacifica Trel. in Standley: 118 (1 920). Type: Sinaloa, Isla Creston
cerca de Mazatlan, Trelea.ie s.n. (MO).
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
45
FIGURE 2. — Parts of older inflorescences of Agave vivipara var.
vivipara : A, developing bulbils, x 0.9; B, seeding capsule,
x 0.9. Scale bar; 20 mm. Material collected by E M. A. Steyn
and deposited under G.F. Smith & E.M.A. Steyn 2 (PRE). Artist:
G. Condy.
A. yaquiana Trel. in Standley: 120 (1920). Type: Sonora, from rocky
hillsides between Hermosillo & Ures, Trelease 391 (MO).
A. owenii I.M.Johnst.: 999, 1000 (1924). Type: Sonora, on an islet in
Guaymas Harbor, Johnston 3085 (CAS).
(For a more complete list of synonyms, see Serna & Lopez-Ferrari: 9
(1993).
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Agave vivipara var. vivipara in southern
Africa.
Surculose, caulescent, succulent perennial with radia-
ting rosettes ± 1.5 m diam.; trunk up to 1 m. Leaves light
green, margins straight, surfaces smooth, hard-fleshy,
very fibrous, rigidly spreading, ascending to descending,
0.75-0.9 m long, ± 90 mm wide at midblade, lanceolate,
flat in transverse section, narrowed and thickened
towards the base; leaf bases broadened, overlapping,
stem clasping; teeth easily detachable, usually prominent
with low, broad bases and slender cusps, 2-3 mm long,
evenly spaced, strongly decurved (apparently releasing
an allergen causing painful local swellings when punc-
turing the skin), commonly reddish brown to dark brown,
interstitial teeth usually absent; terminal spine 20-25
mm long, decurrent, conical, reddish brown to dark
brown, greying with age, pungent. Inflorescence panicu-
late, 3. 5-4.0 m long, bulbiferous after flowering; shaft as
long as or slightly longer than panicle; umbels varying in
number from 24-36; branches horizontally spreading.
Flowers yellowish green, about 55 mm long, short-
stalked, scented. Perianth with tepals unequal, cucullate
and pubescent at tip, margins involute, 21-22 mm long,
outer segments overlapping the inner; inner segments
prominently keeled, wilting before flower reaches
female phase, crimping outward and downward; perianth
tube succulent, cup-shaped, 11 mm diam. at level of fil-
ament insertion, 12 mm deep. Stamens exserted 20 mm
beyond tepals in male phase flower, yellowish with
brownish red speckles; filaments stout, tapered towards
apex, inserted in single series in throat of perianth tube,
45 mm long; anthers 22 mm long before dehiscence,
cylindrical, yellowish with conspicuous brownish red
speckles, versatile. Ovary small, 25 x 10 mm diam.,
cylindrical, terete, indistinctly grooved in distal region;
neck short, slightly constricted; style stout, terete, 72 mm
long, light green with brownish red speckles. Fruit large,
broadly ellipsoid, 30-35 x 20-25 mm, short-beaked,
freely seeding. Seeds large, 7-12 x 6-8 mm, dull black,
flattened, D-shaped with complete marginal wing, hilar
notch shallow. Chromosome number unknown. Flower-
ing time : February and March.
GAUTENG. — 2528 (Pretoria): Meyers Park area; along Simon
Vermooten Road, 0. 9 km north of entrance to German School on west-
ern shoulder of road, (-CB), G.F. Smith & E.M.A. Steyn 2 (PRE).
Illustrations: Gentry: t. 20.6-20.9 (1982); Smith & Steyn: t. 1
(1999b); Cruz-Ramos et al.: t.l, 2 (1985).
Common names: kleingaringboom (Afrikaans). Wild
populations in the Yucatan (Mexico) are referred to as
chelem (Colunga-Garci'aMarfn & May-Pat 1997).
REFERENCES
ANONYMOUS 1988. Red dye from an invader cactus weed. Plant
Protection News 13: 1,2.
BAYON, R 1997-1998. Face to face on invasive species: the end of
the biodiversity economy? World Conservation 4/1997-1/1998:
45—48.
COLUNGA-GARCIAMARIN, P. & MAY-PAT, F. 1993. Agave studies
in Yucatan, Mexico. I. Past and present germplasm diversity
and uses. Economic Botany 47: 312-327.
COLUNGA-GARCIAMARIN, P. & MAY-PAT, F. 1997. Morphologi-
cal variation of henequen ( Agave fourcroydes, Agavaceae)
germplasm and its wild ancestor (A. angustifolia) under uni-
form growth conditions: diversity and domestication. American
Journal of Botany 84: 1449-1465.
46
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
COLUNGA-GARCIAMARIN, P„ COELLO-COELLO, J., EGUIAR-
TE, L.E. & PINERO, D. 1999. Isozymatic variation and phylo-
genetic relationships between henequen (Agave fourcroydes)
and its wild ancestor A. angustifolia (Agavaceae). American
Journal af Botany 86: 115-123.
CRUZ-RAMOS, C.A., ORELLANA, R. & ROBERT, M.L. 1985. Agave
research progress in Yucatan. Desert Plants 7: 71-92.
FORSTER, PL 1992. New varietal combinations in Agave vivipara
(Agavaceae). Brittonia 44: 74, 75.
FORSTER, P.I. 1996. Naturalized succulents in the Australian flora.
Haseltonia 4: 57-65.
GENTRY, H.S. 1982. Agaves of continental North America. University
of Arizona Press, Tucson.
HAWORTH, A H. 1812. Synopsis plantarum succulentarum , edn 1.
Richard Taylor, London.
HOWELL, R. & SCHNELL, A. 1991. Beproefde turksvy resepte. Publ-
isher and place of publication unknown.
JOHNSTON, I.M. 1924. Expedition of the California Academy of
Sciences to the Gulf of California in 1921. Proceedings of the
Californian Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, 12: 999, 1000.
KLOOT, PM 1987. The naturalised flora of South Australia. I. The
documentation of its development. Journal of the Adelaide
Botanical Garden 10: 81-90.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum , edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm.
NOBEL, PS. 1994. Remarkable agaves and cacti. Oxford University
Press, New York.
SERNA, A.E. & LOPEZ-FERRARI, A. R. 1993. Las monocotileddneas
Mexicanas una sinopsis floristica, part 1. Consejo Nacional de
la Flora de Mexico, Mexico, D.F.
SMITH, G.F. & MOSSMER, M. 1996. FSA contributions 4: Agava-
ceae. Bothalia 26: 31-35.
SMITH, G.F. & STEYN, E.M.A. 1999a. A first record of Agave decip-
iens naturalised in southern Africa. South African Journal of
Botany 65: 249-252.
SMITH, G.F. & STEYN, E.M.A. 1999b. Agave vivipara: the correct
name for A. angustifolia (Agavaceae). Bothalia 29: 100.
SMITH, G.F., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., ARNOLD, T.H., STEFFENS,
F.E., DIXON, R.D. & RETIEF, J.A. (eds). 1997. List of south-
ern African succulent plants. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
STANDLEY, PC. 1920. Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contributions
from the United States National Herbarium 23. Government
Printing Office, Washington.
TOZZETI, T. 1810. Annuli del museo imperiale di ftsica e storia natu-
rale di Firenze: 2, t. 6.
TURKSVYKWEKERSVERENIGING 1997. Riglyne vir die verbou-
ing van doringlose turksvye vir vrugteproduksie, edn 2. Groep
7 Trust Uitgewers, Sinoville.
WIJNANDS, D O. 1983. The botany of the Commelins. Balkema, Rot-
terdam.
ZIMMERMANN, H.G. & ZIMMERMANN, H. 1987. Aanwending van
jong turksvyblare vir menslike voeding. Boerdery in Suid-
Afrika: Onkruidreeks B. 1.2/1987.
E.M.A. STEYN* and G.F. SMITH*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-03-31.
HYACINTHACEAE
CORRECTION OF A HISTORICAL ERROR IN THE TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION OF URGINEA CILIATA
INTRODUCTION
The current interpretation of Urginea ciliata (L.f.)
Baker is complicated by an unexplained error in Baker’s
(1875) description of the species. Despite having seen
the Thunberg type specimen ( UPS-THUNB8281 ), Baker
clearly states that the distinct cilia on the leaf margins are
black. However, on examination of the type specimen,
we found that the cilia are hyaline and not black. This
was confirmed by herbarium specimens and living plants
in the field and in cultivation. The type description is fur-
ther inadequate due to the absence of a bulb on the speci-
men and the incorrect assumption that the two leaves
preserved on the specimen represent the entire plant.
Subsequent treatments (Schonland 1919; Fourcade 1941;
Jessop 1977) place the species in nomina dubia and
result in confusion in herbaria with Urginea marginata
(Thunb.) Baker.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present taxonomic correction is based on a study
of herbarium specimens of Urginea ciliata and related
taxa from relevant herbaria (BOL, GRA, NBG, PRE), of
living plants in the field and in cultivation and of archival
records housed in the Museum of Evolution, Uppsala
University. Representative specimens were compared
with a JEOL-JSM 840 scanning electron microscope.
Particular attention was paid to the diagnostic cilia found
on the leaf margins.
Urginea ciliata (L.f.) Baker in Journal of the
Linnean Society 13: 218 (1875); Baker: 464 (1897);
Schonland: 41 (1919); Fourc.: 103 (1941); Jessop: 315
(1977). Type: Caput Bonae Spei, Thunberg s.n. ( UPS -
THUNB8281 , holo.!).
Ornithogalum ciliatum L.f.: 199 (1782); Thunb.: 62 (1794); Willd.:
117 (1799); Roem. & Schult.: 528 (1817-1819); Thunb.: 316 (1823);
Kunth: 359 (1843).
Plant (100-)250(-300) mm tall. Bulb globose, slight-
ly flattened at top, hypogeal, 20-25 mm diam., white
turning greenish at apex, scales thick, fleshy, tightly
packed; outer tunic transparent on bulb, becoming loose
at apices, pale brown, dry, leathery, not neck-forming.
Leaves 10, the lower six in two whorls of three, ovate,
(20— )25(— 30) x (15— )17(— 19) mm, the upper four in two
opposite pairs, three being ovate elliptic, ( 1 5— )20(— 25) x
(7—) 10(— 1 5) mm and the uppermost lorate (8—) 1 5(— 20) x
(3-)4(-5) mm, dark glossy green, firm, leathery, surface
smooth, margins densely ciliate, hysteranthous, prostrate
(Figure 4). Desiccated leaves persistent during flowering
and dormancy period, brownish, transparent, leathery,
marginal cilia obvious (Figure 5). Inflorescence erect,
200-260 mm tall, racemose; peduncle and inflorescence
axis slender, 1.0-1. 5 mm thick, thickest at base, maroon,
glossy; fertile part (25— )30— 35(— 60) x (15-)20 mm with
10-15 flowers; sterile tuft minute, 1 mm long, held at an
angle away from the peduncle axis; bracts deltoid,
cupped, acute, held at 45° below pedicel, green tinged
purplish, 1 x 0.5 mm, basal spur dark purple, 0.5 mm
long, apex acute, facing downwards (Figure 6A).
Flowers scentless; pedicels held at 90° to peduncle in
bud, 45° at an thesis and 20° after an thesis, (4— )6 x 0.4
mm, 4-5 mm apart, reddish brown; buds pendulous;
perianth patent at anthesis becoming erect after pollina-
tion, 12 mm diam., translucent white with light brown
keels becoming pale towards apices; lobes spreading,
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
47
FIGURE 4. — Leaf arrangement of Urginea ciliata, Dold 2383. Scale
bar: 10 mm.
equal in length, recurved on either side of keel, fused at
base by 0.4 mm, apices with minute stalked papillae,
inner lobes broadly ovate with obtuse apices, 5.6 x 2.6
mm, outer lobes ovate with acute apices, 5.6 x 1.9 mm
(Figure 6B). Stamens spreading; filaments white, 3 mm
long; anthers bilobed, 1 x 0.2 mm, green, basifixed.
Ovary obovoid, 2 x 1.5 mm, tri-locular, yellow-green;
style tubular, longitudinally grooved into three sections,
2 mm long, receptive surface glossy, not swollen.
Capsule ovoid, erect, 3-7 x 2. 5-5.0 mm, papery, pale
yellow green turning brown (Figure 6C). Seed irregular-
ly pyramidal, 2. 0-2. 5 x 2 mm at base, black, shiny,
winged; wings thin, papery; testa reticulate.
Urginea ciliata and U. marginata specimens are often
confused in herbaria as a result of Baker’s incorrect and
inadequate type description. Complicating matters fur-
FIGURE 5. — Marginal cilia of Urginea ciliata, Dold 2383. Scale bar:
100 pm.
ther, Baker (1875) describes the leaf margin of U. mar-
ginata as obscurely ciliated, however on examination of
the type specimen ( UPS-THUNB8393 ), herbarium spec-
imens (BOL, GRA, NBG, PRE) and living specimens we
observe that the leaf margin is without cilia at all but is
minutely verrucose. The two species are easily distin-
guished by means of the hyaline marginal cilia present on
short rigid prostrate leaves of the latter and the thick car-
tilaginous margins on spreading to erect leaves of the for-
mer. In addition U. ciliata has a racemose inflorescence
with basifixed anthers while U. marginata has an umbel-
late inflorescence and dorsifixed anthers.
Flowering period is from January to February.
Flowers open in pairs in the late afternoon and close
before dark — they do not open again. The vegetative
growing period is from February to October thereafter
dormant to January. The plant is leafless at anthesis with
basal leaves reappearing at the time of fruit development
or soon afterwards. Thunberg’s type sheet is a mixed
gathering representing both leaves and inflorescence.
Although the bulbs are hypogeal, the well preserved but
FIGURE 6. — Urginea ciliata, Dold 2383. A, inflorescence; B, perianth; C, capsules. Scale bars: A, C, 10 mm; B, 5 mm.
48
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
desiccated leaves are persistent and the diagnostic cilia
can be seen on specimens collected over the dormant
period, enabling identification.
Distribution and habitat
Urginea ciliata is essentially an Eastern Cape species
with the majority of collections from the Port Elizabeth
and Joubertina Districts. One isolated record from
Riversdale reflects a disjunction in distribution (Figure
7). This may be a result of sporadic collections due to its
cryptic habit and localised habitat. U. ciliata appears to
be uncommon and restricted to low grassy fynbos where
it is often associated with quartzite outcrops of the Table
Mountain Group (Cape Supergroup Peninsula Forma-
tion). Populations of up to 40 plants are densely congest-
ed between rocks in very shallow sand and gravel soils
and are extremely localised. Altitudes from 110 m to 670
m have been recorded.
It has been established that there can be no question as
to the validity of the Thunberg type material, as the
younger Linnaeus had access to the Thunberg herbarium
and he and Thunberg worked in close collaboration on his
material in Uppsala (fide UPS-THUNB archival records).
Furthermore, there is no material of Omithogalum cilia-
tum L.f. in the Linnaeus herbarium that may have result-
ed in a mistaken type designation. It is clearly Baker’s
error, although it is not known why it was caused.
Baker repeated the error of his earlier type description
in Flora capensis (1897) and applied it as a diagnostic
key character. U. ciliata was subsequently interpreted as
having only two leaves with black cilia on the margins.
As a result later collections were erroneously placed in U.
marginata or not placed at all. Schonland (1919) attrib-
uted to the specimen Cruden 355 from Redhouse, the
manuscript name U. crudeni (ined.) and placed the speci-
men in a type cover (GRA herbarium practice). He does,
however, note that the specimen is closely allied to U. cil-
iata, but was probably misled by Baker’s description.
In 1927, Marloth received a specimen from Riversdale,
Muir 4126, with a note from the collector suggesting that it
may be a new species of Urginea closely related to U. cil-
iata, but there is no indication of Marloth’s opinion. Jessop
( 1 977) discussed Cruden 355 and Muir 4126 under Drimia
marginata (Thunb.) Jessop, comb. nov. and remarked that
the specimens differ from that species by virtue of the cili-
ate margins. He was undecided as to the status of the two
specimens. He refered to Omithogalum ciliatum L.f. and
Urginea ciliata under nomina dubia despite having seen
the Thunberg type ( UPS-THUNB8281 ).
Vouchers: Cruden 355 (GRA, PRE); Dold 2383 (GRA, UPS);
Fourcade 2930 (BOL), 3569 (BOL); Muir 4126 (PRE).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): flats around Riversdale,
(-AB), Muir 4126 (PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): rocky hills north of
Joubertina, (-DD), Fourcade 2930 (BOL); Wagenbooms River at
Joubertina, (-DD), Fourcade 3569 (BOL). 3324 (Steytlerville): between
Kareedouw and Assegai Bosch, (-CD), Fourcade s.n. (BOL). 3325
(Port Elizabeth): flats around Baakens River Valley, (-DC), Cruden 355
(GRA, PRE), Paterson 976. (GRA); Bridgemead, Parsons Vlei, (-DC),
Dold 2383 (GRA, UPS), Olivier 3489b (GRA), Yates 400 (GRA).
Without precise locality: Caput Bonae Spei, Thunberg s.n. (UPS).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the curators of BOL, PRE and
NBG for loans of their material and Dr M.C. Olivier and
Mrs M. Yates for locating Urginea ciliata populations.
Thanks to Mr E. Kruger for photographs.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1875. Revision of the genera and species of Scilleae and
Chlorogaleae. Journal of the Linnean Society 13: 209-292.
BAKER, J.G. 1897. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thistelton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 464, 465. Reeve, London.
FOURCADE, H.G. 1941. Checklist of the flowering plants of the divi-
sions of George, Knysna, Humansdorp and Uniondale.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 20: 103.
JESSOP, J.P. 1977. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 7.
The taxonomy of Drimia and certain allied genera. Journal of
South African Botany 43: 265-319.
KUNTH, C.S. 1843. Enumeratio plantarum 4: 359. Cotta, Stuttgart.
LINNAEUS, C. filius. 1782 (‘1781’)- Supplementum plantarum.
Orphanotropheus, Braunschweig.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1817-1819. Systema vegetabilium
7: 528. Cotta, Stuttgart.
SCHONLAND, S. 1919. Phanerogamic flora of the divisions of
Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa No. 1:41.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis, edn Schultes. Cotta, Stuttgart.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1799. Species plantarum 2: 117. Nauk, Berlin.
A.P. DOLD* and R. MOBERG**
* Selmar Schonland Herbarium, Department of Botany, Rhodes
University, P.O.Box 94, 6140 Grahamstown, South Africa, e-mail:
botd@rhobot.ru.ac.za
** Museum of Evolution, Botany Section (Fytoteket), Uppsala Univer-
sity, Villavagen 6, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden,
e-mail: Roland.Moberg@fyto.uu.se
MS. received: 1999-05-17.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
49
ERICACEAE
TWO NEW SPECIES OF ERICA FROM WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
Erica orthiocola E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov. ( %Melaste -
mon), inflorescentibus floribus duobus in ramulis brevis-
simis et in synflorescentibus densis aggregatis, corolla
breviter infundibuliformi, sepalis pedicello base adnatis,
antheris muticis projectione apicale, foliis ciliatis pilis
brevibus validis plumosis distinguitur.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Rivier-
sonderend Mtns, Pilaarkop, ridge WNW of peak, 1 540
m, (-BB), 26-02-1999, E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver 11230
(NBG, holo.; K, NY, PRE).
Compact rounded woody shrub ± 300( — 400) x 300
mm, single-stemmed reseeder. Branches', numerous
main and secondary with continuous apical growth;
internodes short, less than leaf length, no infrafoliar
ridges, puberulous with simple spreading to reflexed
white hairs. Leaves 3-nate, erect to spreading, imbricate,
± 5.5 x 1.5 mm, oblong-elliptic, adaxially flattened,
abaxially rounded, hard and stiff, glabrous, margins with
short stubby plumose hairs, apex shortly cuspidate, sul-
cus narrow and closed at base; petiole 1 mm long,
appressed, adaxially glabrous, abaxially puberulous.
Inflorescence : flowers 2(1) terminal on highly reduced
lateral branchlets, appearing axillary on main branches,
these branchlets with only 2 bract-like prophylls; pedicel
6 mm long, with very short dense substellate hairs, white
to pinkish; bract about V5 up pedicel, 1.5 x 0.5 mm,
oblong, very slightly apiculate, white-pink, semitrans-
parent, glabrous, sparsely ciliolate, sulcus very small to
absent; bracteoles 2, 2/3 up pedicel, otherwise like bract.
Calyx 4-lobed, 2.5 x 2.0 mm, appressed to corolla; lobes
slightly fused at base and to apex of pedicel, ovate, apic-
ulate, the outer two slightly overlapping inner two, stout
and hard, scarious with semitransparent marginal zone,
pink and green, glabrous, margins with short stout
plumose hairs and finer simple hairs, sulcus narrow, ± '/3
length of lobe. Corolla 4-lobed, 4 x 3.5 mm, shortly and
broadly funnel-shaped, pink turning brownish, glabrous;
lobes erect, 1. 5-2.0 x 1.5 mm, ovate, subacute, keeled
with a dark longitudinal stripe, margins occasionally
toothed to slightly erose. Stamens 8, free, manifest; fila-
ments 2 x 0.4 mm, linear-oblong, slightly narrowed at
base, straight, glabrous, whitish; anthers dorsifixed near
base, bilobed, V-shaped, muticous; thecae 1.5 x 0.5 mm.
oblong with narrowed slightly elongated tip, papillate,
medium brown; pore relatively large, 2/3 length of theca;
pollen in tetrads. Ovary 4-locular, ±1x1 mm, broadly
ellipsoid to obovoid, slightly emarginate, glabrous, dull
pink, with no basal nectaries; ovules 6-10 per locule
pendulous from placenta in upper 2/3; style far exserted,
6 mm long, filiform, glabrous, white to reddish at apex;
stigma small narrowly cyathiform, red. Fruit a dehiscent
capsule, 2x2 mm, valves splitting for 2/3 their length to
angle of 30°, apices not incurved, septa equal on valves
and columella. Seeds 0.7 x 0.5 mm, ellipsoid, yellow to
dark brown, testa reticulate, with thick radial cell walls,
internally slightly wavy, externally ± straight. Figure 8.
This new species is characterised by the 2-flowered
inflorescence borne on very short lateral branchlets
arranged in a rather dense synflorescence near the ends
of the branches, the shortly funnel-shaped corolla, sepals
fused to the upper end of the pedicel which is covered
with short substellate hairs, and the muticous anthers
with an apical projection. The leaves are stiff and hard
and edged with short stout plumose hairs.
There are several species similar to E. orthiocola
based on the pedicel being longer than the corolla, the
corolla shape, and anther type with extended portion
above the pore, but it differs in a number of respects, the
main one being the short stout plumose hairs on the mar-
gins of the leaf. E. pillarkopensis , which is sympatric
with E. orthiocola , is a (arge woody shrub to small tree,
with the flowers numerous, bright pink and arranged all
over the branches, the leaves and sepals hairy with sim-
ple short hairs, and the calyx differently shaped and not
fused. E. seriphiifolia and E. cubica both have a simple
many-flowered inflorescence on the ends of the main
branches, the bract axial, long scattered distinctly
plumose hairs on the pedicel, the stem with distinct
infrafoliar ridges and the leaf margins with a few short
simple hairs. They also have a similar fusion of the sep-
als with the upper portion of the pedicel. E. obconica is
similar in the mucronate leaf and obconic stigma, but the
bract and bracteoles are in a higher position on the pedi-
cel and the inflorescence is simple and terminal on the
main branches. E. roseolobci has the similar fusion of
sepals but differs by the included style and simple hairs
on the pedicel.
The flowers of E. orthiocola lack nectaries around the
base of the ovary and have a slightly expanded stigma.
This would indicate that the pollination is probably
effected by wind. This could not be confirmed in the
field due to the slightly late stage of flowering we
encountered when collecting the type material.
The new species is very localised on a single slope in
the Riviersonderend Mountains just west of Pilaarkop
(Figure 9) where it grows on very steep south-facing
rock ledges or small outcrops just below the summit
ridge, hence the name orthiocola ( orthius = high, lofty;
colus = inhabiting). Several visits to the area provided
only a few scattered small groups of plants, the largest
with about five plants, which had escaped the major fire
seven years ago. The plants appear to be very slow-grow-
ing since no young plants were observed. Flowering
time'. February and March.
This locality is peculiar in having several species of
plants confined to the upper south slopes of the ridge.
There are several undescribed Erica species including
the following one, and the unusual and very rare
Lonchostoma esterhuyseniae Strid (Bruniaceae). This is
probably in part due to the habitat conditions which are
cool and moist, with an accumulation of cloudy mist
from the southeast winds caused by the leeward position
of the ridge in relation to the peak of Pilaarkop.
50
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 8. — Erica orthiocola. A, flowering branch; B, branch; C, leaf, D, inflorescence on very short lateral branchlet with subtending leaf
removed; E, flower; F, corolla; G, corolla opened to show androecium; H, stamen, front, side and back views; I, ovary; J, ovary opened
laterally; K, capsule; L, seed; M, testa cells. All drawn from the type, Oliver & Oliver 11230. A, x 1; B, D, 4 mm; C, E-K, 2 mm; L, 1
mm; M, 100 pm. Artist: Inge Oliver.
E. pillarkopensis appears to have been very abundant
on the southern slopes of the ridges just west and east of
Pilaarkop as evidenced by the numerous silvery grey
skeletons remaining after the extensive fire in 1994. This
is particularly so in the upper portion of the main kloof
of Olifantsbosch. At present there are very few old plants
of the species remaining and these are only in rocky
areas where they escaped the fire. Some are in the region
of 3 m high with a trunk of 200 mm diam. Surprisingly
there are very few young plants visible on any of the
slopes.
E. seriphiifolia , E. cubica and E. obconica all occur
on the Langeberg range with E. cubica extending as far
away as the South Coast of KwaZulu-Natal. E. roseolo-
ba is restricted to a single peak in the Klein Swartberg
near Seweweekspoort and was only recently described
(Oliver & Oliver 1996).
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon); Riviersonderend Mtns,
Pilaarkop, 5400 ft, (-BB), 8-03-1970, Esterhuysen 32416 (BOL); ibid.,
4500-4800 ft, 7-03-1971, Esterhuysen 32579 (BOL, K); ibid., 9-04-
197 1, Esterhuysen BOL55092 (BOL); ibid., 1 520m, 9-10-1998, Oliver
11177 (NBG); ibid., 04-1940, Stokoe 7877 (BOL); ibid., 06-1949,
Stokoe SAM62327 (BOL, SAM).
Erica columnaris E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov. (§ Hermes /
Chlorocodon), synflorescentibus densis columnaribus,
foliis floribus superantibus, bracteolis plerumque plene
recaulescentibus, calcaribus antherarum brevibus ex
parte decurrentibus, nectariis nullis distinguitur.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Rivier-
sonderend Mtns, Pilaarkop, moist southern slopes below
ridge WNW of peak, 1 500 m, (-BB), October 1998,
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
51
FIGURE 9. — Known distribution of both Erica columnaris and E.
orthiocola.
E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver 11177 (NBG, holo.; BM, BOL, E,
K, MO, NY, P, PRE, S, W).
Stoutish, erect, virgate shrub 0.5(— 1 ) m high, single-
stemmed reseeder. Branches : main branches of previous
season often devoid of leaves and terminating in a com-
pact innovation zone of 7-15 fastigiate leafy secondary
branches, these terminating in synflorescences 15-40
mm long, branches glabrous with infrafoliar ridges,
tertiary branchlets very reduced, 0.5 mm long terminat-
ing in a florescence. Leaves 4-6-nate, subspreading-
incurved, imbricate, 7-8 x 1 mm, lanceolate, flat adaxi-
ally and slightly rounded abaxially, glabrous, ciliolate,
sulcus narrow and closed at base; those on tertiary
reduced branchlets in 2 or 3 whorls, very small, bract-
like and whitish; petiole 0.8 mm long, appressed,
glabrous, ciliolate. Inflorescence'. 1(2) flowers subtermi-
nally on very reduced lateral branchlets appearing axil-
lary to the longer leaves on secondary branches, these
arranged in column-like synflorescences 15-40 mm
long at ends of secondary branches; pedicel 2 mm long,
glabrous; bract partially recaulescent xf up the pedicel,
1 x 0.7 mm, ovate, acute, esulcate, glabrous, ciliolate,
light green; bracteoles 2, fully recaulescent as lateral
lobes of calyx, occasionally 2 partially recaulescent and
appressed to calyx, rarely in middle position, when par-
tially recaulescent then like the bract in shape. Calyx 4-
partite; lobes appressed to corolla, occasionally lateral
two imbricating at base, 1.5 x 1 mm, ovate-lanceolate,
glabrous, ciliolate, green often tinged red, sulcus nar-
row, ‘/ 3 length of sepal. Corolla 4-lobed, 2.5 x 2. 5-3.0
mm, urceolate, glabrous, wine-red with whitish base;
lobes recurved, 0.8 x 1 mm, broadly triangular, margins
entire. Stamens 8, free, included; filaments 1 mm long,
broadly oblong, flat, straight in upper half, glabrous,
white; anthers bilobed, ovate in front view, awned; the-
cae erect, appressed, glabrous, dark brown; awns decur-
rent on filament, ± 0.1 mm long, linear, simple, pendu-
lous, white; pore '/2 length of theca; pollen in tetrads.
Ovary 4-locular, 8-lobed, 0.5 x 0.8 mm, oblate obovoid,
emarginate, glabrous, reddish green, nectaries absent;
ovules 4 per locule, spreading from placenta in central
position on columella; style exserted, 2.5 mm long, nar-
rowly cylindric, sometimes slightly curved apically,
glabrous, greenish white base and dark red apex; stigma
peltate-capitate, sometimes reflexed, dark red. Fruit a
dehiscent capsule, 1.2 x 2 mm, valves splitting to ± 45°
and nearly to the base, septa ± 30% and very thin on col-
umella and 70% on valve, placenta very convoluted,
columella easily shed from capsule. Seeds 0.5 x 0.4 mm,
ellipsoid, circular in cross section, yellow brown, testa
reticulate, cells 60 x 90 |im, radial walls narrowly wavy.
Figure 10.
This new species is distinguished by the dense com-
pound synflorescence, the leaves of which are longer
than the lateral flowers, the bracteoles often fully
recaulescent as the lateral segments of the calyx, the
short anther spurs which are partially decurrent along the
apex of the filament, and the absence of nectaries. The
pseudospicate, columnar synflorescences give the species
its name, columnaris = pillar- or column-like.
Several species show alliances with E. columnaris
based on the long erect tightly packed synflorescences
with small coralline flowers and stems with infrafoliar
ridges. E. regerminans with a very similar habit and
method of branching, differs in its slightly larger, more
conspicuous dark pink flowers that are longer than the
leaves, its corolla being ellipsoid with a longer pedicel
and in the long anther spurs which are not decurrent. E.
dodii differs in having a soft delicate growth form, corol-
la more open cyathiform to campanulate, anthers small
and delicate with spurs much longer but slightly decur-
rent, style included, flowers pink not dark purplish pink
and larger and more visible. E. coarctata Wendl. differs
in the flowers being slightly smaller and more cyathi-
form and greenish cream-coloured sometimes tinged
pink, the anthers lacking spurs, the stigma peltate-cyathi-
form and far exserted, and the ovary not emarginate.
E. columnaris exhibits clearly the transition from par-
tially to fully recaulescent bracteoles in the Ericeae
which condition was noted in the problems with the
delimitation of the genera Philippia Klotzsch (Oliver
1988) and Ericinella Klotzsch (Oliver 1994). In ± 70%
of the flowers, it would appear that the bracteoles have
been lost, whereas they have recaulesced fully with the
pedicel and become incorporated in the calyx as the
apparent lateral sepals. This will be addressed in a forth-
coming publication dealing with the relationship of the
rest of the minor genera of the Ericeae to Erica.
The lack of nectaries and the expanded stigma com-
plex would indicate that the pollination syndrome for the
species is anemophily. On walking through a large dense
population, occasional puffs of pollen were noted com-
ing from disturbed plants. However, there were numbers
of small beetles visiting the inflorescences of some
plants. This could suggest a case of evolutionary change
from entomophily to anemophily taking place in a
species. We postulate that this is the situation in a num-
ber of other species of Erica. The occurrence of fully
recaulescent bract and bracteoles is always accompanied
by loss of nectaries, expansion of the stigma and anemo-
phily in the Ericeae.
52
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 10. — Erica columnaris. A, flowering branch; B, flowering branch, close-up; C, stem with leaves removed; D, leaf; E, flower; F, bract;
G, sepal; H, stamen, front, side and back views; I, gynoecium; J, ovary opened laterally; K, capsule; L, seed; M, testa cells. A-J, drawn
from type, Oliver & Oliver 11117; K-M, drawn from Oliver 10940. A, x 1; B, 4 mm; C, D, 2 mm; E-G, 2 mm, H-K, 1 mm; L, 0.5 mm.
Artist: Inge Oliver.
The new species is confined to the steep southern
slopes of the ridge, just west of the main peak of Pilaar-
kop in the Riviersonderend range (Figure 9), which is the
only known locality. It forms dense stands of plants in
some areas, mostly on the loamy open slopes away from
the rocks inhabited by E. orthiocola. Flowering time :
September and October.
E. regerminans is confined to moist south-facing
slopes in the Langeberg range, whereas E. coarctata is
widespread from the Cape Peninsula to the George area
where it grows on dry lower slopes of sometimes coastal
flats associated with calcareous deposits. The latter spe-
cies has been noted by us to be a resprouter in several
well-separated localities.
E. dodii occurs from the Cape Peninsula to the Rivier-
sonderend Mountains where it grows sympatrically with
E. columnaris, sometimes less than a metre apart, but
then up against or under overhangs of large rocks and
rock faces with a soft delicate habit no more than 200
mm high.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Riviersonderend Mtns near
Lindeshof, Pilaarkop, 4000 ft, (-BB), 17-11-1965, fruiting, Ester-
huysen 31400 (BOL, K); ibid., 4500 ft, 24-10-1971, Esterhuysen 32718
(BOL, NBG, PRE); ibid., 4750 ft, 28-10-1997, fruiting, Oliver 10940
(K, NBG, NY, PRE).
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
53
REFERENCES
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1988. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in southern
Africa. Bothalia 18: 1-10.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1994. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XV. The
generic relationship between Erica and Ericinella. Bothalia 24:
121-126.
OLIVER, E.G.H & OLIVER, I.M 1996. Studies in the Ericaceae
(Ericoideae) XIX. Two new species of Erica from southern
Africa. Feddes Repertorium 107: 305-310.
E.G.H. OLIVER* and I.M. OLIVER*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1999-05-17.
ASPHODELACEAE: ALOOIDEAE
THE GENUS POELLNITZIA INCLUDED IN ASTROLOBA
Considered by various authors to be a species of Aloe
L., Astroloba Uitewaal or Haworthia Duv., the monotyp-
ic Poellnitzia rubriflora (L. Bolus) Uitewaal has had a
particularly chequered taxonomic history since its origi-
nal description in the genus Apicra Willd. (Smith 1994).
Vegetatively the species shows close affinities to some
species of Astroloba and accords completely with the
genus in its tubular, actinomorphic flowers with includ-
ed stamens. A close relationship between the two genera
is also supported by the results of a preliminary survey of
lipophilic anthranoid aglycones in the roots of subfamily
Alooideae (B-E. van Wyk pers. comm.). The genus
Poellnitzia was distinguished from Astroloba on the
basis of the red flowers with connivent, reduplicate-val-
vate tepals (Smith 1995; Smith et al. 1995). Careful
examination of the flowers, however, shows that the aes-
tivation is in fact imbricate and the species thus differs
from Astroloba only in the more or less horizontal
racemes bearing secund, orange-red flowers with con-
nivent tepals. These floral adaptations are now recog-
nised as part of the syndrome of sunbird pollination
which is widespread in southern Africa (Goldblatt &
Manning 1999) and the resemblance between the flowers
of Poellnitzia and the bird-pollinated genus Microloma
R.Br. (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae) is particularly
striking. In the wild the species is visited by Lesser dou-
ble-collared sunbirds, which insert just the tip of their
beak into the flowers before extending the tongue into
the tube to extract the nectar. Species of Astroloba are
pollinated by anthophorine bees and have smaller, dull-
coloured flowers. The sugar composition of the nectar of
Poellnitzia also reflects a shift from insect- to bird-polli-
nation and is hexose-dominant whereas the nectar of
Astroloba is sucrose-dominant (Van Wyk et al. 1993).
Adaptations for specialised pollination strategies alone
are insufficient grounds for the recognition of genera and
we believe that Poellnitzia is best treated as a species of
Astroloba adapted to pollination by sunbirds.
Astroloba rubriflora (L.Bolus) G.F.Sm. & J.C. Man-
ning, comb. nov.
Apicra rubriflora L.Bolus, The Annals of the Bolus Herbarium 3: 13,
t. 2D (1923). Type: South Africa, Western Cape, Bonnievale, Smith s.n.
(BOL, holo.!).
REFERENCES
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1923. Novitates africanae. The Annals of the Bolus
Herbarium 3: 13, t.2D.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1999. Evidence of bird pollina-
tion in Iridaceae of southern Africa. Adansonia 21: 25-40.
SMITH, G.F. 1994. Taxonomic history of Poellnitzia Uitewaal, a unis-
pecific genus of Alooideae (Asphodelaceae). Haseltonia 2: 74—
78.
SMITH, G.F. 1995. FSA contributions 3: Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae,
1028010 Poellnitzia. Bothalia 25: 35, 36.
SMITH, G.F., VAN WYK, B-E. & CONDY, G. 1995. Poellnitzia rubri-
flora. Flowering Plants of Africa 54: 94—98.
VAN WYK, B-E., WHITEHEAD, C.S., GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S.,
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & SMITH, G.F. 1993. Nectar sugar
composition in the subfamily Alooideae (Asphodelaceae).
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 21: 249-253.
J.C. MANNING* and G.F. SMITH**
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-12-14.
ALOE DELPHINENSIS IN ALOE SECT. LOMATOPHYLLUM
The genus Lomatophyllum Willd. has been disting-
uished from Aloe L. primarily by the former having
fleshy, indehiscent fruit (berries) with unwinged seeds
and the latter having dehiscent fruit (capsules) with
winged seeds. Smith & Van Wyk (1991) following a
cladistic analysis of the subfamily Alooideae (As-
phodelaceae), concluded that Lomatophyllum could be
easily included in Aloe but that a comprehensive taxon-
omic revision of the species concerned was required.
Evidence from chromosome morphology, leaf surface
anatomy, pollen morphology (Schill 1973) and leaf sap
flavanoid chemistry (Viljoen et al. 1998) all lend support
to this move to reduce Lomatophyllum to the synonymy
of Aloe.
Rowley (1996) has proposed that species included in the
genus Lomatophyllum be transferred to Aloe as members
of Aloe sect. Lomatophyllum G.D. Rowley. Various new
combinations and new names have been proposed to vali-
date this proposal (Rowley 1996; Newton & Rowley
1998). These automatic transfers have done little to resolve
the species relationships in the group. However, Rauh
(1998) has recently provided an identification key to the 18
species he included in his concept of Lomatophyllum.
54
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
A comprehensive, phylogenetically based, infragener-
ic classification of Aloe is not currently available.
Reynolds (1966, 1982) chose to recognise 10 sections in
the genus Aloe s.s. However, the continued use of his
classification has been questioned in recent times on the
basis of chemical investigations (Viljoen et al. 1998).
Van Wyk & Smith (1996) did not mention these sections
at all and used informal groups to arrange the South
African species of Aloe. The recognition of Lomato-
phyllum at sectional rank in Aloe is probably not equiva-
lent to that used by Reynolds (1966, 1982) in defining
the various sections in the genus. Hence the infrageneric
classification of Aloe remains to be resolved and a dif-
ferent rank such as subgenus may need to be considered
for the taxa of Lomatophyllum, assuming monophylly of
this infrageneric unit.
Nevertheless the characters used to define the section
Lomatophyllum are distinctive and easily ascertained if
fresh fruit are available. There are a number of species of
Madagascan Aloe for which the fruit are unknown (cf.
Rauh 1995, 1998) and hence their sectional classification
is unknown. One of these is Aloe delphinensis Rauh
(1990), based on his collection Rauh 68629a from Pic St.
Louis, near Fort Dauphin in southwest Madagascar.
Rauh (1990) allied the new species to A. bakeri Scott
Elliot but subsequently considered that a further new
species A. lucile-allorgeae Rauh was the closest relative
of A. delphinensis (Rauh 1998).
Fruit set was stimulated in a cultivated specimen of
Aloe delphinensis using pollen from A. dinteri Berger, a
‘true’ Aloe from Namibia (Reynolds 1982). These fruits
were fleshy and indehiscent, and contained wingless
seeds (Figure 11).
Aloe delphinensis can be included in Aloe sect.
Lomatophyllum thus bringing the number of included
species in that section to nineteen. This species may be
distinguished from the other Madagascan taxa in the
group by inserting an additional couplet into the key of
Rauh (1998).
FIGURE 11. — Aloe delphinensis. A-C, fruit: A, side view, x 2; B, api-
cal view, x 2; C, cross section, x 2. D, E, seed, x 10. All from
fresh material of P.I. Forster PIF24630 [voucher at Queensland
Herbarium (BRI)] prepared from a plant purchased by N. Carr
in a Madagascan nursery as this species and in close agreement
with the protologue and accompanying dlustrations of Rauh
(1990, 1995, 1998).
Aloe L. sect. Lomatophyllum G.D. Rowley in
Excelsa 17: 59 (1996).
Aloe delphinensis Rauh in Cactus & Succulent
Journal (US) 62: 230 (1990). Type: Madagascar, on
granitic rocks on the Pic St. Louis, near Fort Dauphin,
100 m, Rauh 68629a (holo., HEID).
Fruiting pedicel 14-15 x ± 0.5 mm, glabrous. Fruit
oblong, triquetrous, indehiscent and fleshy, 18-20 x
9-10 mm diam. Seed ± globose, ± 2 mm diam., with a
minute ring or ridge around ± 2F of the circumference
(Figure 11).
Key to Madagascan species
(based mainly on Rauh 1998, but with nomenclature updated for inclusion within Aloe )
la Plants with bulbils in the inflorescence 2
lb Plants without bulbils in the inflorescence 3
2a Rosettes small, with leaves spreading, green with white bands and spots; bulbils 1 or 2, in the floral region
A. propagulifera (Rauh & Raz.) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
2b Rosettes larger, with leaves erect, uniformly green; bulbils in the axils of bracts up the scape
A. schilliana L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
3a Stems decumbent, short, richly branched, forming dense mats A. socialis (H. Perrier) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
3b Stems erect, single or branched from the base, but not forming dense mats 4
4a Plants with thick stems to 100 mm diam. and 2-3 m tall with a large terminal leaf rosette A. peyrierasii Cremers
4b Plants with thinner and shorter stems 5
5a Stems short, to 0.5 m and 10-20 mm in diam 11
5b Stemless rosette plants or with very short stems 6
6a Rosettes small, to 0.5 m in diameter; leaves spreading or erect 7
6b Rosettes larger, stemless or with a short stem; leaves 0. 1-1.0 x 0.1-0.12 m 8
7a Leaves narrow linear, erect, densely dentate along the margins; in cultivation forming dense clumps; inflorescence much longer
than leaves A. belavenokensis (Rauh & Gerold) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
7b Leaves triangular, not densely dentate 9
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
55
8a Leaves up to 1 x 0.1-0.12 m, acute; inflorescences much exceeding the leaves
A. occidental^ (H. Perrier) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
8b Leaves shorter, with rounded apices; inflorescences shorter than the leaves A. orientalis (H Perrier) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
9a Leaf blades with large deltoid marginal teeth, often chocolate brown; raceme few-flowered, globular
A. prostrata (H. Perrier) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
9b Leaf blades with small marginal teeth, not chocolate brown; raceme elongated 10
10a Flowers lemon yellow with green tips A. citrea (Guillaumin) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
10b Flowers rose pink A. rosea (H. Perrier) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
1 la Inflorescences shorter than the leaves 12
1 lb Inflorescences longer than the leaves 13
12a Stems not creeping at the base; leaves very long and narrow, at least over 0.3 m A. oligophylla Baker
12b Stems very thin and stolon-like at the base, creeping and producing adventitious roots; leaves shorter, 0.2-0. 3 m long
A. antsingyensis (Leandri) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
13a Stems not branching from base, leaf blades green, straight; raceme dense with hanging flowers
A. namorokaensis (Rauh) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
13b Stems branching from base, leaf blades bluish green or brownish green, spirally rolled in upper part or decurved; raceme lax ... . 14
14a Leaf blades bluish green; marginal teeth 10-15 mm apart; floral tube 25-30 mm long; fruit globose, ± 12 mm diam.
A. anivorartonensis (Rauh & Hebding) L.E.Newton & G.D. Rowley
14b Leaf blades brownish green; marginal teeth 2-8 mm apart; floral tube 20-22 mm long; fruit oblong, 9-10 mm diam
A. delphinensis Rauh
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to N. Carr for plant material and W. Smith,
Queensland Herbarium (BRI) for Figure 11.
REFERENCES
NEWTON, L.E. & ROWLEY, G.D. 1998. New transfers from Lomato-
phyllum to Aloe (Aloaceae). Bradleya 16: 114.
RAUH, W. 1990. Two new aloes from Madagascar. Cactus & Succu-
lent Journal (US) 62: 25-31.
RAUH, W. 1995. Succulent and xerophytic plants of Madagascar. Vol.
1 . Strawberry Press, Mill Valley.
RAUH, W. 1998. Three new species of Lomatophyllum and one new
Aloe from Madagascar. Bradleya 16: 92-100.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1966. The aloes of tropical Africa and Madagas-
car. The Trustees of the Aloes Book Fund, Mbabane, Swazi-
land.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1982. The aloes of South Africa, edn 4. Balkema,
Cape Town.
ROWLEY, G.D. 1996. The berried aloes: Aloe Section Lomatophyllum.
Excelsa 17: 59-62.
SCHILL, R 1973. Studien zur systematischen Stellung der Gattung
Lomatophyllum Willd., ein Vergleich mit Aloe Tourn. (Lilia-
ceae). Beitrdge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 49: 273-289.
SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, B-E. 1991. Generic relationships in the
Alooideae (Asphodelaceae). Taxon 40: 557-581
VAN WYK, B-E. & SMITH, G.F. 1996. Guide to the aloes of South
Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
VILJOEN, A M., VAN WYK, B-E. & VAN HEERDEN, F.R. 1998.
Distribution and chemotaxonomic significance of flavanoids in
Aloe (Asphodelaceae). Plant Systematics & Evolution 211:
31-42.
PI. FORSTER*
* Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Mt Coot-tha
Road, Toowong, Queensland 4066, Australia.
MS. received: 1999-06-21.
Bothalia 30,1: 57-68 (2000)
Morphology and anatomy of the rhizome and frond in the African
species of Polystichum (Pteropsida: Dryopteridaceae)
J.P. ROUX* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: anatomy, lamina, morphology, Polystichum , Pteridophyta, rhizome
ABSTRACT
The generic circumscription of the polystichoid ferns within the Dryopteridaceae and their relationships has been and
still is much debated. Although floristic accounts for Polystichum are available for many parts of the world, its morpholo-
gy and evolutionary trends within the genus are still poorly understood. In this study, primarily based on the Polystichum
species from Africa and neighbouring islands, the morphology and anatomy of the rhizome and frond are addressed. Several
species from other genera within the Dryopteridaceae are used for comparison, to gain a better understanding of generic
affinities and evolution in this family.
INTRODUCTION
Polystichum Roth is a cosmopolitan genus comprising
180 to 200 species. Although floristic accounts of the
genus exist for many parts of the world, a comprehensive
modern taxonomic account for the genus as a whole has
never been undertaken. The circumscription and definition
of species within the genus are still weak. Reasons for the
group’s inadequate taxonomic status include the occur-
rence of common and widespread allopolyploid taxa
(D.H. Wagner 1979), sterile FI hybrids, apomictic taxa,
substantial phenotypic variation within populations and in
most cases, a lack of critical morphological studies.
The morphology and anatomy of Polystichum repre-
sentatives from the Indian subcontinent was studied by
Chandra & Nayar (1982) and those of western North
America by D.H. Wagner (1979). Polystichum, Arach-
niodes Blume, Cyrtomium C.Presl, Dryopteris Adans.
and Phanerophlebia C.Presl form a closely related group
of genera within the tribe Dryopterideae and are here
referred to as the polystichoid ferns. Cyrtomium and/or
Phanerophlebia are often included in Polystichum
(Tryon & Tryon 1982; Kramer 1990). Yatskievych
(1996), however, treated Cyrtomium and Phanerophle-
bia as distinct genera and showed that both have a clos-
er affinity with Polystichum than with each other, a
hypotheses first proposed by Christensen (1930). The
genera Arachniodes, Dryopteris and Polystichum are not
always clearly separable, as each include species that
display characters generally associated with the other
genera. The proposed close affinity of these genera is
also supported by the occurrence of a natural hybrid
between Dryopteris and Polystichum (W.H. Wagner
1985). Widen et al. (1981) showed that phloroglucinols
widespread in Dryopteris also occur in Arachniodes but
are rare in Polystichum. Indusia, when present, are
peltate in Polystichum and reniform in Arachniodes and
* National Botanical Institute, Compton Herbarium, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany, Univer-
sity of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received: 1998-10-20.
Dryopteris. All these genera, however, also contain species
that are exindusiate.
This study is primarily based on Polystichum species
from Africa, Macaronesia, the Madagascan region and
the Marion Island groups, but observations on species
from outside of this region are also considered. For com-
parative purposes several species from other genera
within the Dryopterideae were included in the study. The
aim is to gain a better understanding of generic affinities
within the Dryopterideae and to speculate on possible
evolutionary trends within the group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Material used in the anatomical study was obtained
from the wild and from cultivated plants (Table 1). Voucher
specimens are housed at the Compton Herbarium (NBG).
Fresh material was fixed in FAA for at least 24 hours. For
rhizomes, serial sections were cut by hand, stained with
alcian blue for one minute, rinsed in water and tem-
porarily mounted in glycerine. Camera lucida drawings
were prepared at x 7.5, x 15 or x 31.25 magnifications
using a Wild ‘Heerbrugg’ microscope. The stelar struc-
ture of the rhizome was reconstructed using these sec-
tions.
Roots, stipes, rachises, secondary rachises and lami-
nae were sectioned 45 pm thick using a Reichert-Jung
Hn 40 freeze microtome. Sections were stained with
safranin and alcian blue for one minute, rinsed in water
and dehydrated in a series of 50% ETOH, 40%
ETOH:60% toluene, 20% ETOH:80% toluene and 100%
toluene, after which they were permanently mounted in
Entellan (Art. 7961, E. Merck, Darmstadt).
For describing the vasculature of the stipe and lamina
fresh material was used; freehand serial sections were
made at 2.5 or 5 mm intervals along the entire length of
the axis, noting where bundles divide or fuse and where
pinnae and pinnules originate.
Epidermal features were studied using pinna or pin-
nule fragments removed from selected specimens, and
58
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 1. — Material examined in the study of the rhizome and frond stelar structure
Taxon
Voucher
Origin
Rhizome
pungens (Kaulf.) C.Presl
setiferum (Forssk.) T.Moore ex Woyn.
transkeiense W.B.G. Jacobsen
transvaalen.se N.C. Anthony
NORTHERN PROVINCE. — 2329 (Pietersburg): Louis Trichardt,
Hanglip Forest Station, (-BB).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park,
Tugela Gorge, (-DB).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Amabele, (-DA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3226 (Fort Beaufort): Hogsback Forest Station,
(-DB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Knysna, Touws River, (-DC).
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Sabie, (-BB).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park,
(-DB).
KWAZULU-NATAL — 2731 (Louwsburg): Ngome Forest Reserve.
KWAZULU-NATAL — 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park,
(-DB).
FREE STATE. — 2829 (Harrismith): Harrismith, Platberg, (-AC).
EASTERN CAPE.— 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Settler’s Park, (-DC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Swartberg Pass, (-AC).
GAUTENG. — 2627 (Potchefstroom): Roodepoort, Strubens Valley,
(-BB).
LESOTHO. — 2928 (Marakabeis): Semonkong, LeBihan, (-CC).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3129 (Port St Johns): Port St Johns, (-DA).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2831 (Nkandla): Nkandla Forest, (-CA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Isidinge Forest, (-CA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Evelyn Valley Forest, (-CA).
FREE STATE. — 2829 (Harrismith): Farm Metz, (-CA).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park,
(-DB).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Amabele, (-DA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Pirie Forest, (-CB).
MPUMALANGA.— 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Graskop, (-DD).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2829 (Harrismith): forest south of Seheletwane,
(-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Table Mountain, (-CD).
Madeira.
EASTERN CAPE.— 3029 (Kokstad): Weza Forest, (-DA).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2829 (Harrismith): forest south of Seheletwane,
(-AC).
Roux 2370
Sine coll. s.n.
Roux 2498
Roux 2516
cleared using household bleach. Once cleared the mate-
rial was repeatedly rinsed in clean water and semi-
permanently mounted in either glycerine or glycerine
jelly. Cover slips were sealed with Entellan.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
MORPHOLOGY
Rhizome
Detailed studies of the rhizome of Polystichum are
scant and its morphology remains poorly known. The rhi-
zome anatomy of Cyrtomium falcatum was studied by
Gibson et al. (1984) and found to be basically identical to
that of Polystichum. Rhizomes are rarely represented in
herbarium collections, hence in modern floristic accounts
they are often not mentioned. In many species the rhi-
zome is bulky and this may explain why most collectors
are deterred from collecting them. The Polystichum
species studied by Chandra & Nayar (1982) in India, all
have short, stout, and erect rhizomes that are mostly
unbranched. In African species two distinct rhizome
types, namely, erect and decumbent occur. The erect rhi-
zome type is short and generally unbranched with a large
number of fronds crowded in the apical region (Figure
1A). Up to seven leaf gaps overlap at any given time. This
rhizome type is sheathed by a mass of wiry roots, with
FIGURE 1 — Rhizome and lamina morphology. A-D, Polystichum-. A, erect rhizome type in P. transvaalense, Roux 2585. B, C, P. incongruum :
B, decumbent rhizome type, Roux 2377 \ C, acroscopic proximal pinnules, basiscopic pinnule shows free venarion, Roux 2385. D, P.
macleae. Roux 2242, acroscopic pinna, section shows free venation. E, L, M, Arachniodes webbiana subsp . foliosa, Roux 1001 : E, basi-
scopic proximal pinnule; L, rachis section showing confluent nature of axes sulci; M, pinnule segment showing venation. F, Dryopteris
inaequalis , Taylor 4264, basiscopic proximal pinnule and acroscopic pinnule with free venation; G, Cyrtomium caryotideum var.
micropterum, Roux 1913, section of pinna outline with reticulate venation; H, Phanerophlebia auriculata, pinna outline with section show-
ing venation, after Yatskievych (1996). I, J, P. transkeiense, Roux 2493: I, proximal part of rachis showing non-confluent nature of axes
sulci; J, distal part of rachis showing confluent nature of axes sulci; K, C. falcatum ex hort., non-confluent nature of sulci. All vouchers
housed in NBG. Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C, I-M, 5 mm; D-F, 10 mm; G, H, 20 mm.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
59
60
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
helically arranged persistent stipe bases several layers
deep and, at least in the younger parts, also with paleae,
giving greater bulk to the rhizome; the highly dissected
stellar structure suggests that it is derived. The decumbent
rhizome type is usually long and branched, terete to
slightly laterally or dorsoventrally flattened; up to five
leaf gaps overlap at a time; the fronds are generally more
widely spaced, often exposing the rhizome intemodes
(Figure IB). In both rhizome types paleae form a dense
covering especially over the apical region.
Branching of the rhizome takes place through the for-
mation of lateral buds at regular or irregular intervals
along the main stem. Branching in Polystichum
transkeiense W.B.G.Jacobsen is regular. In certain habi-
tats, P. incongruum J.P.Roux, P. monticola N.C. Anthony
& Schelpe and P. pungens (Kaulf.) C.Presl also show
regular branching. In P. dracomontanum Schelpe &
N.C. Anthony and P. marionense Alston & Schelpe, lat-
eral buds initiate the formation of long stoloniferous out-
growths. As a result, large clonal stands are formed by
these species. Fronds are initially widely spaced along
these stolons but marked primary thickening takes place
distally, and the fronds become more closely spaced.
Roots are irregularly formed over the entire length of the
stolons. Since the thinner stoloniferous branches can rot
away more readily, individual rhizomes may become iso-
lated thus serving as a means of clonal propagation.
Branching and stolon formation is here viewed as an
adaptation for plants occurring in environments not
always conducive to sexual reproduction. Species with
this type of rhizome often occur in more exposed, often
dryish habitats that may also be subjected to periodic
fires. It is therefore also possible that the clonal habit
might be an adaptation to periodic burning. The short,
suberect to erect rhizome type is, however, much more
common in the genus. In contrast to the decumbent rhi-
zome type, the erect rhizome of the African species
mostly remains unbranched resulting in these species
occurring as individuals rather than as clonal clusters.
Plants with this rhizome type are also adapted to a wide
range of habitat conditions, but tend to be more site-spe-
cific. The erect rhizome is generally well seated in the
substrate, whereas the decumbent rhizome type mostly
grows epigeally, although the stolons of P. dracomon-
tanum are subterranean. Occasionally the rhizome in P.
transkeiense may also be subterranean.
Species in the genera Arachniodes, Cyrtomium,
Dryopteris and Phanerophlebia have either erect or
decumbent rhizomes. If the cyatheoid ferns are accepted
as an ancestor of the dryopteroid ferns, as suggested by
Bower (1928); Ching (1940); Copeland (1947); Nayar
(1970, 1979) and Holttum (1973), then the short erect rhi-
zome should be viewed as the primitive state and the
decumbent rhizome as derived. However, a dennstaedtioid
origin as proposed by Holttum (1947) and Pichi Sermolli
(1977) would suggest the reverse. Hasebe etal. (1995) and
Pryer et al. (1995) presented strong morphological and
molecular evidence that Dennstaedtiaceae branched off
the tree below the Dryopteridaceae, with Cyatheaceae
considerably below that. The evolutionary transformation
of the rhizome habit thus remains open to debate.
Roots
An abundance of wiry adventitious roots occurs irregu-
larly over the entire surface of the rhizome, often form-
ing a dense fibrous mass. Roots appear to be long-lived
but they are, however, only initiated at or near the grow-
ing apex of the rhizome. Young roots are whitish to pale
brown and mostly simple, whereas older roots are dark
brown to black and frequently monopodially branched.
Golden brown root hairs form a dense covering a short
distance behind the root apex. They do, however, lose
their function on the older parts of the roots and become
abraded. In the erect rhizome type, roots also provide
good anchorage.
Fronds
All the Polystichum species within the study area are
evergreen; the fronds remain alive for at least two annual
cycles. The fronds are persistent and are shed through
decay or mechanical damage only. A type of frond re-ori-
entation as described by Nooden & W.H. Wagner (1997),
occurs in P. wilsonii H. Christ. In this high altitude
species, which frequently grows in exposed sites, a large
percentage of the fronds may collapse during the cold
winter months. The plants are, however, never entirely
deciduous.' Frond length varies considerably among
species and in P. incongruum it can attain a length of 1.8
m. There is a strong correlation between the rhizome type
and the number of fronds borne by a plant. Species with
an erect rhizome always bear more fronds than those with
a decumbent rhizome. In P. transvaalense N.C. Anthony,
up to 27 fronds are borne by each plant, whereas in
species with a decumbent rhizome, the number of fronds
rarely exceeds seven. Fronds in the Polystichum species
studied are monomorphic, with no evident differentiation
between the sterile and fertile fronds. The fronds are dif-
ferentiated into a distinct stipe and lamina. Vernation of
the fronds is initially circinate, but as the stipe and lami-
na elongate, the juvenile fronds become hook-shaped in
species such as P. dracomontanum, P. luctuosum (Kunze)
T.Moore, P. transvaalense and P. wilsonii. Monomorphic
fronds are most common in the Dryopterideae, but in
Dryopteris, e.g. D. dracomontanum Schelpe & N.C. An-
thony, they are dimorphic.
Stipe
The use of stipe characters in fern taxonomy has been
studied by Lin & De Vol (1977, 1978). They clearly illu-
strate that stipe characters, especially anatomy, are more
useful at the generic and family level than at the species
level. The stipe in all the studied species of Polystichum
is firm. In species with erect rhizomes the stipes grow
directly upwards, whereas in species with a decumbent
rhizome, they are initially strongly curved upwards.
Stipe length and diameter are variable but may be up to
930 mm long in P. incongruum and up to 10 mm diam.
in P. volkensii (Hieron.) C.Chr. In most species the stipe
base is variously rounded adaxially and abaxially, but
distally they all become shallowly to deeply sulcate
adaxially. In most taxa the basal part of the stipe is cas-
taneous (brownish) to ebeneous (black) and often lus-
trous (nitid), becoming paler distally in dried material. In
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
61
live plants, however, the distal part of the stipe generally
remains green. The stipe bases of the African
Polystichum species appear not to be modified into dis-
tinct trophopods as described by W.H. Wagner &
Johnson (1983). Trophopods have been reported for all
the Phanerophlebia species with the exception of P.
macrosora (Baker) Underw. (Yatskievych 1996). In most
species the dorsolateral aerophore line is conspicuous
throughout the length of the stipe, generally being some-
what paler in colour than the surrounding tissue. In P.
luctuosum the aerophore line is often green, thus con-
trasting strongly with the generally castaneous to ebe-
neous stipe. The stipe is always clothed with paleae, the
density of which shows considerable variation amongst
the species.
Lamina
Most Polystichum species in the study area have 2-
pinnate pinnatifid to 3-pinnate laminae, with 1-pinnate
laminae recorded in P. falcinellum (Sw.) C.Presl, P.
kalambatitrense Tardieu, P. macleae (Baker) Diels and
P. maevaranense Tardieu only. P. macleae has laminae
ranging from 1-pinnate to 2-pinnate. Lamina length
varies considerably between species with the longest
laminae, up to 925 mm, having been recorded in P.
volkensii (Hieron.) C.Chr. Lamina outline also shows
variation between species, but within a species the
degree of variation is fairly restricted.
Pinnae and pinnules are borne subopposite to alter-
nate on the rachis and secondary rachis. Proximally the
pinnae and pinnules are usually short-stalked but distally
they become sessile and eventually adnate. They are
mostly herbaceous in texture, but in P. dracomontanum
and P. marionense, both of which grow in harsh condi-
tions, the pinnules are usually coriaceous. The lamina is
always discolorous with the adaxial surface darker in
colour. Adaxially the pinnules are pale to dark green in
colour, but in P. dracomontanum and P. incongruum at
Hogsback in the Eastern Cape, exposed and older fronds
generally turn bronze.
Polystichum is characterised by a largely acroscopic
pinna development (Figure 1C, D), but basiscopically
developed laminae are often present in P. vestitum
(G.Forst.) C.Presl and P. whiteleggei Watts. The degree
to which the proximal acroscopic pinnules are developed
shows considerable inter- and infraspecific variation.
Interspecific variation is exemplified especially in P.
drepanum (Sw.) C.Presl, P. incongruum and P. macleae.
In Arachniodes and Dryopteris the laminae are most-
ly basiscopically developed (Figure IE, F). In Arach-
niodes and in Cyrtomium and Phanerophlebia, where
most species have 1-pinnate laminae, the pinnae are also
acroscopically developed and often conspicuously auri-
cled (Figure 1G, H, M).
In Polystichum the pinnae are mostly oblong-acumi-
nate to narrowly oblong-acuminate in outline, but in
some species they may be ovate, narrowly triangular, or
in P. marionense often deltoid. In some species the proxi-
mal pinnae are reduced towards the base of the frond,
and often also strongly conduplicate and deflexed. In
most species the proximal pinnae are usually widely
spaced with no or little overlap with the more distal ones.
Towards the lamina apex, however, the pinnae frequent-
ly become imbricate. The number of stalked pinnae per
lamina ranges from 12 to 15 in P. maevaranense, but up
to 45 in P. setiferum (Forssk.) T.Moore ex Woyn. Pinna
length in most species falls within the 100 to 200 mm
range, but in P. marionense the pinnae may reach a maxi-
mum length of only 36 mm, whereas in P. drepanum the
proximal pinnae may be up to 450 mm long.
Pinnules are always inaequilateral, asymmetric and
variously ovate, trullate or rhomboid in outline, with an
acroscopic auricle. The base is mostly truncate acroscopi-
cally whilst basiscopically it is mostly narrowly to broad-
ly cuneate. Margins may be lobate, serrate, doubly ser-
rate or dentate with the teeth being obtuse, pungent or
aristate. Pichi Sermolli (1972), in describing P. kiliman-
jaricum Pic.Serm., emphasized the number and direction
of the pinnule awns, but we found them to be extremely
variable and of no taxonomic value. In P. marionense the
pinnule margins of plants growing in exposed conditions
are often revolute. The number of short-stalked pinnules
per pinna ranges from five in P. marionense to 27 in P.
zambesiacum Schelpe. Pinnules are mostly small, but in
P. drepanum the proximal acroscopic pinnule can be up
to 83 x 15 mm. Indumenta occur on both the adaxial and
abaxial lamina surfaces of most species with the abaxial
surface generally more densely set.
Rachis
Chromatically the rachis does not differ significantly
from the stipe, being green throughout, but in older
fronds it may become dark brown proximally. The
aerophore line that extends from the stipe is generally
visible with the naked eye and may be paler or darker in
colour than the surrounding tissue. The rachis is mostly
straight throughout its length but distally it may become
slightly flexuose in some species. Adaxially the rachis
forms a V-shaped sulcus along its entire length. In P. luc-
tuosum the sulcus is shallow and not very prominent.
Holttum (1959) stressed the importance of the external
shape of the rachis in defining related groups: in the
Dryopteris- group of ferns, to which Polystichum be-
longs, the rachis has a median sulcus that opens adaxial-
ly to admit the sulcus of the secondary rachises; the
raised edges of the secondary rachis sulcus join the sides
of the costa sulcus with the edge of the pinnule-lamina
decurrent on the secondary rachis as a lateral wing.
Our observations on live Polystichum, Cyrtomium
and Dryopteris material show that the rachis sulcus does
not always open to admit the secondary rachis sulcus, as
the pinna stalk is often terete, especially in the lower part
of the lamina (Figure II, J, K). In Arachniodes, however,
the sulci of the rachis and that of the lower order axes are
confluent (Figure 1L). Paleae similar to those occurring
on the stipe extend to the rachis. Palea density on the
rachis is, however, determined by the species and to a
lesser degree also by the prevailing environmental con-
ditions.
62
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 2. — Rhizome, root and frond anatomy in Polystichum. A, B, t/s rhizomes showing distribution of vascular tissue:
A, P. transvaalense , Roux 2510A (NBG); B, P. dracomontanum. C, t/s root; D, t/s root showing vascular and non-
vascular tissue. E, t/s rachis; F, t/s dorsal vascular bundle of rachis. G, P. crinulosum , sine coll. s.n. (PJ, adaxial epi-
dermis; H, I, P. aculeatum , Moire s.n. (RAB), adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells; J, P. transkeiense, Roux 2498
(NBG), schematic presentation of frond vasculature showing branching and fusion of vascular bundles along axes.
B-D, Roux 2715 (NBG); E, F, Roux 2377 (NBG). Scale bars: A, B, 5 mm; C, 800 pm; D, F, 100 pm; E, 2 mm; G-I,
140 pm; J, 50 mm.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
63
Bulbils
Bulbils are here defined as buds or outgrowths capa-
ble of developing into an independent plant. Although
external stimuli may contribute to the formation of bul-
bils, this ability largely appears to be fixed genetically. In
the polystichoid ferns the ability to produce gemmae
appears to be restricted to Polystichum , Dryopteris and
Phanerophlebia juglandifolia (Willd.) J.Sm. Within
Polystichum a diverse group of species is capable of pro-
ducing bulbils. They have been recorded in sections
Lasiopolystichum Daigobo, Metapoly stichum Tagawa,
Macropoly stichum Daigobo, Cyrtomiopsis Tagawa, Ste-
nopolystichum Daigobo and Haplopolystichum Tagawa
emend. Daigobo. Bulbils in Polystichum are borne either
at the retuse apex of a terminal pinna, at the apex of an
extended glabrous rachis or, as in the case of the species
within the study area, adaxially on the rachis near the
frond apex in or near the pinna ‘axils’. One to three bul-
bils per frond appear to be the norm, but in P. pauciac-
uleatum Bonap. up to five bulbils are borne by a frond.
Paleated bulbils may also occur near the pinna apices in
P. tsaratananense Tardieu and occasionally on the stipe
of P. setiferum (Moore 1855). African and Madagascan
species bearing gemmae include P. crinulosum , P. kili-
manjaricum, P. maevaranense, P. magnificum F.Ballard,
P. pauciaculeatum , P. tsaratananense and P. volkensii
and total 27% of the species within the defined area.
Within the Madagascan region 62% of the species are
bulbiliferous compared with the 64% of species occur-
ring in the West Indies (Mickel 1997).
Most taxa which produce bulbils seem to occur in
moist or tropical conditions where this form of vegeta-
tive reproduction may contribute to more rapid colonisa-
tion in areas of fierce competition. Bulbil formation in
the ferns, its distribution and ecological implications,
requires further study. The fact that bulbil formation
occurs in clearly unrelated taxa suggests that it originat-
ed independently in these groups.
Venation
Venation patterns in the genera of the Dryopterideae
are diverse. This is the principle character commonly
used to segregate Cyrtomium and Phanerophlebia from
Polystichum. In Polystichum the veins of all the species
in the study area are always free and anadromous (Figure
1C, D), but in the circumboreal P. braunii (Spenn.) Fee,
at least some of the veins are catadromous (Kramer
1987). Most veins run into the teeth where they always
terminate near the lamina margin. In P. volkensii the
veins show a slight enlargement towards their apices.
In the fertile pinnules of 2-pinnate species of
Polystichum, the veins mostly terminate in the soral
receptacle midway between the costa and the margin.
This feature is also found in several Arachniod.es and
Dryopteris species. Variations, however, do occur with
the fertile vein often extending for a short distance
beyond the sorus. However, in 1-pinnate Polystichum
and free-veined Phanerophlebia species, the venation of
the fertile pinnae shows no or little differentiation from
that of the sterile pinnae, in that the veins bearing sori are
not conspicuously shortened, thus extending well beyond
the sorus (Figure 1H). Also in most Dryopteris species
the sori-bearing veins are not shortened and extend to the
margin (Figure IF).
Cyrtomium and some Phanerophlebia species have
reticulate venation (Figure 1G). Studies showed that
reticulation in these genera have different origins
(Mitsuta 1977). In Cyrtomium the reticulations have
either a costal or a discal origin, whereas in Phanero-
phlebia they are exclusively marginal (W.H. Wagner
1979). The areolae formed by the reticulations in
Cyrtomium all have one or two (often three) free excur-
rent veinlets on which the sori are borne. In Phanero-
phlebia the areolae have no included veinlets.
ANATOMY
Rhizome: stelar structure
The stelar structure of the Polystichum rhizome can
best be classified as a dictyostele as defined by Schmid
( 1 982). By this definition, two or more perforations (leaf,
root or branch gaps) overlap along the vascular cylinder.
In those Polystichum species with the erect rhizome type,
the number of vascular bundles or meristeles (leaf, root
and branch traces excluded) may number as many as
eight (Figure 2A). In the decumbent rhizome type, how-
ever, the number is typically lower at four or five (Figure
2B), but in P. monticola up to seven vascular bundles
may occur. These bundles are variable in size and shape
and are situated approximately in a medial ring.
The rhizome of Cyrtomium falcatum is a radially
symmetrical dictyostele but here only three traces vascu-
larise each frond; the lowest one diverging into the abax-
ial region of the frond axis and the other two traces into
the adaxial region of the frond axis (Gibson et al. 1984).
The rhizome branch trace in P. transkeiense is a
strand that originates laterally from one of the larger vas-
cular bundles of the main axis. This trace is dorsoventral
and haplostelic as defined by Schmid (1982). The first
frond borne by this rhizome branch is not associated with
a leaf gap. However, when the second and third fronds
develop, non-overlapping leaf gaps are formed. At this
stage the stele is still dorsoventral. A true dictyostele is
established later.
Root traces branch at irregular distances off the dorsal
or lateral surfaces of the main axis vascular bundles and
are not associated with root gaps. Chandra & Nayar
(1982) claim that they originate from the base of the leaf
trace as well, but we were unable to confirm this. The
stele in the roots of most species is circular in cross sec-
tion, whereas in P. luctuosum it is often conspicuously
elliptic with the protoxylem centres forming the distal
poles. In all the Polystichum species studied the roots
were found to be consistently diarch and exarch (Figure
2C, D). In Cyrtomium caryotideum var. micropterum, a
taxon often included in Polystichum (Kramer 1990), the
roots were found to be triarch.
64
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Frond: stelar structure of the axes
The stelar structure of the stipe base is characterised
by four to five (rarely seven) vascular bundles arranged
in a U-shape towards the adaxial surface. Khullar &
Gupta (1979) reported up to nine vascular bundles in P.
biaristatum (Blume) T.Moore, whereas smaller species
like P. obliquum (D.Don) T.Moore merely have two. In
Polystichum the arc is a broken line with the larger vas-
cular bundles located in a dorsolateral position at either
end and the smaller ones between (Figure 2E). The
smaller vascular bundles are the first to branch from the
lateral ends of two adjacent rhizome meristeles and the
larger ones are the last to branch from the rhizome meris-
teles. A reduction in the number of vascular bundles usu-
ally takes place along the length of the stipe as some of
the smaller bundles merge. An increase often occurs as a
bundle may also split to fuse again after a short distance.
The xylem strand in the larger meristeles is curved and
hooked adaxially, the so-called hippocampus shape when
viewed in cross section (Lin & De Vol 1977) (Figure 2F).
Xylem bundles in the smaller meristeles are circular to
broadly elliptic in cross section. In Dryopteris we
observed a consistently larger number of vascular bun-
dles (up to 12) in the stipe.
Xylem tissue in the vascular bundles is composed of
helical and scalariform tracheids with thin plates of
xylem parenchyma irregularly dispersed between them.
Protoxylem of the smaller and larger vascular bundles
has an endarch arrangement. The phloem, which forms a
sheath around the xylem, is more prominent in the outer
dorsolateral and ventral sides of the xylem. The pericy-
cle consists of large parenchymatous cells two to four
cell layers deep. The endodermis is characterised by
inner and radial walls that are secondarily thickened and
in which numerous simple and branched pits of variable
sizes are scattered. Pit apertures are always elliptic in
outline.
In all the species of the Dryopterideae studied the
arrangement of the vascular tissue in the rachis is essen-
tially the same as that of the stipe. In the rachis, howev-
er, there is a further reduction in the number of vascular
bundles towards the lamina apex. Also here the smaller
bundles initially merge with one another at irregular
intervals and often also divide as in the stipe. The final
small bundle eventually merges with one of the larger
dorsolateral bundles some distance from the lamina
apex. The two dorsolateral meristeles eventually fuse
and continue as a single vascular bundle to the lamina
apex (Figure 2 J ).
The vascular tissue serving each pinna, branches as a
single dorsolateral trace from one of the two larger vas-
cular bundles. This trace soon divides and the two (rarely
three) bundles that are formed run parallel to one anoth-
er for most of the pinna length before they finally merge
near the pinna apex. This condition holds true for 1 -pin-
nate species and those with more compound laminae
suggesting the costa of 1 -pinnate species to be analogous
with the secondary rachis of species with more com-
pound laminae. Costules and veins branch from one of
the two pinna meristeles or the terminal bundle of the
pinna apex and remain single-stranded.
Rhizome: non-vascular tissue
In most of the species investigated the non-vascular
tissue of the rhizome is distinctly differentiated into
parenchymatous ground tissue and sclerenchyma.
Histologically the cortex and pith are identical, consist-
ing of small isodiametric parenchyma cells. Towards the
epidermis, however, the cells become compressed with
the anticlinal walls somewhat sinuate. A narrow sheath
of sclerenchyma several cell layers deep is situated
beneath the epidermis. In the outer cortical layer this
sclerenchyma usually extends to the root trace. In P.
transkeiense a small sclerotic cap is formed on the outer
periphery of the root trace only, whereas in P. dra-
comontanum and P. incongruum a sclerotic sheath often
forms around the entire root trace. Chandra & Nayar
(1982) also found sclerenchyma bundles associated with
the departing leaf trace bundles. Small to large groups of
partially to moderately thick-walled sclerenchymatous
cells occur at random throughout the ground tissue of
most species and often extend to the stipe bases. Their
abundance appears to be determined by age and the envi-
ronment with more cell aggregates present in older parts
of the rhizome as well as in plants occurring in exposed
habitats. In older rhizomes they appear to be concentrat-
ed near the larger meristeles. Considering the abundance
and distribution of sclereid clusters in the ground tissue
of the rhizome, Chandra & Nayar (1982) suggested some
evolutionary trends and species relationships within
Polystichum. D.H. Wagner (1979) also found the pres-
ence of sclereid clusters in the rhizome of P. munition
(Kaulf.) C.Presl diagnostic in separating it from P. imbri-
cans (D.C.Eaton) D.H. Wagner where they are mostly
absent. However, because of their variability, we consid-
er them to be of no taxonomic value for the species we
studied. The deposition of phenolic substances in the
sclerenchymatic clusters in especially the older parts of
the rhizome may act as a preservative against decay, thus
promoting longevity.
The cortex of Polystichum roots is composed of a
dense inner sclerenchymatic sheath and parenchymatous
outer cortex. In old roots the outer non-sclerotic cortical
layer decomposes. Sclerenchyma cells opposite the pro-
toxylem poles are generally not as strongly lignified as
the rest of the sheath (Figure 2D). Schneider (1996)
terms these non-sclerotic cells opposite the protoxylem
poles passage cells, a feature that characterises the
Davallia type of root.
Frond: non-vascular tissue
In cross section the stipe base is usually circular,
tetragonal or transversely broadly ovate in outline. In the
upper part of the stipe, however, the adaxial surface is
usually variously sulcate, as is the rachis. In cross section
the epidermal cells are small and isodiametric in outline
and their walls generally densely lignified, similar to the
underlying band of sclerenchyma. In young material this
layer is interrupted dorsolaterally by the aerophore lines
studied by Davies (1991). In younger fronds the lateral
aerophore lines are composed of parenchymatous cells
with large intercellular spaces and are usually not very
rich in phenolic substances. With age, however, this tis-
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
65
sue also becomes sclerified. Stomata occurring on the
stipe and rachis are confined to the aerophore line and
may be raised but are mostly flush with the epidermis. A
tanniferous sclerenchyma layer is deposited on the inner
tangential and radial walls of the cell layer adjoining the
endodermis. The density of this layer is determined by
age with that in older fronds being more prominent.
The lamina anatomy of species with 1 -pinnate fronds
differs slightly from those species with more compound
laminae. In cross section the pinnules are flat with a shal-
low V-shaped sulcus adaxially along the costa that has
slightly raised margins. The costa and veins that are situ-
ated equidistant between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces
are enveloped by a narrow layer of parenchymatous tis-
sue, a bundle sheath, that stretches from the adaxial to
the abaxial epidermis. This tissue becomes lignified as
the frond ages. In P. macleae, a 1 -pinnate species, the
pinna structure is similar except that the costa is signifi-
cantly enlarged abaxially. This enlarged costa is com-
posed of parenchymatous mesophyll in which the two
vascular strands that run parallel to each other occur.
Epidermal cells
Epidermal cells can provide many characters of taxo-
nomic value (Stace 1984), such as cell size, shape, ori-
entation and anticlinal wall undulation. Cell size, howev-
er, may be influenced by ploidy level and environmental
factors (Metcalfe & Chalk 1950).
Epidermal cell size in Polystichum has been studied
by Chandra (1977), who concluded that Polystichum has
a closer affinity with Cyrtomium than it has with
Arachniodes and Dryopteris. Epidermal cells in all the
species of this investigation are elongated parallel to the
veins and are irregular in shape. Cell size of the adaxial
and abaxial epidermis differ, those of the abaxial epi-
dermis usually being larger. The anticlinal walls of the
epidermal cells are generally sinuous to deeply lobed
(Figure 2H), but in P. crinulosum (Desv.) J.P.Roux the
cells walls are almost straight (Figure 2G). Epidermal
cells occurring abaxially along the veins are generally
narrow and their anticlinal walls are not as deeply sinu-
ate as those of the intercostal cells. Cell size varies con-
siderably between species, with the smallest cells in P.
ammifolium and the largest in P. wilsonii (Table 2).
Stomata
Stomatal ontogeny in pteridophytes has been studied
by Mickel & Lersten (1967), Pant & Khare (1969), Sen
& Hennipman (1981) and Mehra & Soni (1983) to name
a few. The most comprehensive studies on the morphol-
ogy of the mature stomatal complex are those of Van
Cotthem (1970), Sen & Hennipman (1981) and Mehra &
Soni (1983).
Stomata in Polystichum are confined to the abaxial
surface of the lamina and are positioned in the same plane
as the epidermal cells, oriented with their longitudinal
axis parallel to the lateral veins (Figure 21). Anomocytic,
eupolocytic, copolocytic and staurocytic stomata have
been reported for Polystichum (Van Cotthem 1970;
Chandra 1977; Mehra & Soni 1983). In the species dealt
with here, we found eupolocytic stomata to be the most
common type, followed by the anomocytic state. A few
copolocytic stomata were noted in P. aculeatum (L.)
Roth, P. dracomontanum, P. falcinellum, P. incongruum
and P. kalambatitrense. Guard cell length is fairly vari-
able: the smallest stomata were recorded in P. crinulosum
and the largest in P . falcinellum (Table 3). In P. setiferum
stoma initials often abort during early development.
Stoma size appears to be related to ploidy level (Table 3).
TABLE 2. — Adaxial epidermal cell length in Polystichum
Taxon Range and mean (pm) SD N
aculeatum (L.) Roth
ammifolium (Poir.) C.Chr.
crinulosum (Desv.) J P.Roux
dracomontanum Schelpe & N.C. Anthony
drepanum (Sw.) C.Presl
falcinellum (Sw.) C.Presl
incongruum J.P.Roux
kalambatitrense Tardieu
kilimanjaricum Pic.Serm.
luctuosum (Kunze) T.Moore
macleae (Baker) Diels
maevaranense Tardieu
magnificum F.Ballard
marionense Alston & Schelpe
monticola N.C. Anthony & Schelpe
pauciaculeatum Bonap.
pungens (Kaulf.) C.Presl
setiferum (Forssk.) T.Moore ex Woyn.
transkeiense W.B.G. Jacobsen
transvaalense N.C. Anthony
tsaratananense Tardieu
volkensii (Hieron.) C.Chr.
wilsonii H. Christ
zambesiacum Schelpe
x maderense J.Y.Johnson
x saltum J.P.Roux
SD, standard deviation; N, number of observations.
66
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 3. — Guard cell length in Polystichum
SD, standard deviation; N, number of observations.
CONCLUSIONS
This study illustrates our poor understanding of the
genus. Polystichum, like other polystichoid ferns, is
characterised by a set of features, most of which are also
shared by other members within the assemblage, rather
than a set of unique characters (Table 4). The genus can,
however, be readily distinguished by an adaxially sulcate
rachis with four to five (rarely seven) vascular bundles
arranged in a U-shape, axes that are adaxially shallowly
sulcate, the sulcus of the secondary axes confluent or not
with that of the main axis, 1 -pinnate to 3-pinnate fronds
with (mostly) acroscopically developed pinnae and pin-
nules, anadromous free venation, indumentum composed
of paleae (rarely also clavate glandular hairs), sori occur-
ring dorsally on the veins or at a vein apex, and a peltate
indusium (secondarily lost in a number of species).
In Polystichum the short, erect rhizome type is the
most common, occurring in a wide range of taxa of
which many are not considered related and is also wide-
spread in the other polystichoid genera. Species belong-
ing to this group are mostly forest dwelling and occur as
individuals. Species in the second rhizome type can
reproduce vegetatively and have the ability to grow in a
wider range of habitats. This clone-forming group can
consequently be found growing in forests, forest margins
or open habitats. The sharing of resources by clone-form-
ing plants (Hutchings 1997) may compensate for the
fewer fronds produced by each rhizome branch.
Chandra & Nayar (1982) and D.H. Wagner (1979) con-
sider the presence and distribution of sclerenchymatic cell
aggregates in the cortex and pith of the rhizome of taxo-
nomic value. Our observations, however, suggest their
presence and number is influenced by age and habitat and
we consequently consider them of no taxonomic value.
Root morphology and anatomy also appear to have
little taxonomic value at the species or genus level. In
Polystichum both the Dennstaedtia type and Davallia
type of cortex occur (Schneider 1996). These root types
are widespread within the Pteropsida occurring in sever-
al groups generally not considered related. The latter
type, characterised by the presence of passage cells
opposite the protoxylem poles, we observed in P. luctu-
osum only. All species had diarch roots apart from
Cyrtomium caryotideum var. micropterum, where triarch
roots were observed, a feature that requires further study.
Frond morphology in African Polystichum, as in most
polystichoid ferns, is of the monomorphic type. Only in
Dryopteris, however, do several species have dimorphic
fronds. This derived feature is widespread and within the
Pteropsida must have arisen independently on numerous
occasions. The morphology and anatomy of the axes in
polystichoid ferns also exhibit some important evolu-
tionary trends. Holttum (1959) considered the external
shape of the rachis and the way in which the shape is
modified when a secondary rachis is attached to it, of sig-
nificant evolutionary and taxonomic importance. He
used this feature in separating fern groups with a similar
habit and sori. Our observations in Polystichum, howev-
er, show that this feature exhibits intra- and interspecific
variation in the pinnae stalks often being terete rather
than sulcate. The pinna sulcus is thus not confluent with
that of the rachis. The large number of small vascular
bundles in the stipe and rachis of Dryopteris taxa we
studied appears to be unique within the Dryopterideae,
suggesting it to be of taxonomic value, but the evolu-
tionary significance of this is not understood. The sec-
ondary rachis being homologous with the costa in 1-pin-
nate species of polystichoid ferns suggests frond simpli-
fication to be derived (Mitsuta 1977; Yatskievych 1989,
1996).
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
67
TABLE 4. — Summary of some morphological and anatomical character trends in the rhizome and frond of polystichoid ferns based on species
studied and a literature survey
* Depending on the circumscription of the genus, for example P. dubium (Karst.) Diels has reticulations.
Within the polystichoid ferns as defined earlier, only
certain Polystichum and Dryopteris species have the
ability of producing bulbils on the laminae. In these gen-
era one or more bulbils are mostly borne on the rachis
behind the apical pinna. In the West Indies, however,
most of the Polystichum species bear bulbils, either at a
retuse apex of the terminal pinna or at the apex of an
extended rachis. The ability to produce bulbils is here
viewed as a derived feature. The distinct way in which
the bulbils are borne suggest that this feature has also
arisen independently on more than one occasion in
Polystichum.
Ontogenetic studies show that monopodially branch-
ed free veins are ancestral and that reticulate venation
within the polystichoid ferns is derived (Mitsuta 1977). It
is widely accepted that reticulate veins are derived inde-
pendently in Cyrtomium and Phanerophlebia. Yatskie-
vych (1996) is also of the opinion that within Phanero-
phlebia it arose independently on two occasions. Sorus-
bearing veins terminating near the lamina margin are
here considered ancestral, whereas modified veins termi-
nating in the sorus or extending for a short distance
beyond the sorus are considered derived.
The epidermal cell anticlinal walls show considerable
variation in the degree to which they are undulated and
are here not considered to be of any taxonomic value.
Polystichoid ferns are all hypostomatic, and the stomata
are mostly of the anomocytic type. Our observations
confirm that within closely related species ploidy level is
reflected in the guard cell length as P. pungens, an octo-
ploid (pers. obs.) has larger stomata than P. incongruum
which is tetraploid (Table 3).
Judging by the information provided, more detailed
studies on a wider range of species are required if a bet-
ter understanding of Polystichum , and its affinity with
the other genera in the Dryopterideae is to be formed.
Further studies may reject or support some of the specu-
lative evolutionary trends proposed here. The view of
Yatskievych (1989) who suggested Polystichum to be
polyphyletic, is supported here.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to express our thanks to Yvonne Reynolds,
librarian at the Harry Molteno Library, Kirstenbosch, and
the various South African Botanical Liaison Officers that
served at Kew since 1987 for obtaining literature. Our
thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers for their valid
criticism on an earlier draft of this paper.
REFERENCES
BOWER, F.O. 1928. The ferns. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press,
England.
CHANDRA, P. 1977. Epidermal studies in some species of Poly-
stichum Roth. New Botanist 4: 101-107.
CHANDRA, P. & NAYAR, B.K. 1982. Morphology of some polysti-
choid ferns. II. The sporophyte of Arachniodes , Cyrtomium and
Polystichum. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 61:
391-403.
CHING, R.C. 1940. On the classification of the family Polypodiaceae.
Sunyatsenia 5: 201-268.
CHRISTENSEN, C. 1930. The genus Cyrtomium. American Fern Jour-
nal 20: 41-52.
COPELAND, E.B. 1947. Genera filicum. Choranica Botanica,
Waltham, Massachusetts.
DAVIES, K.L. 1991. A brief comparative survey of aerophore structure
within the Filicopsida. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
107: 115-137.
GIBSON, A.C., CALKIN, H.W. & NOBEL, P.S. 1984. Xylem anato-
my, water flow, and hydraulic conductance in the fern
Cyrtomium falcatum. American Journal of Botany 1 1 : 564—574.
HASEBE, M., WOLF, P.G., PRYER, K.M., UEDA, K., ITO, M„
SANO, R„ GASTONY, G.J., YOKOYAMA, J„ MANHART,
J.R., MURAKAMI, N„ CRANE, E.H., HAUFLER, C.H. &
HAUK, W.D. 1995. Fern phylogeny based on rbch nucleotide
sequences. American Fern Journal 85: 134—181.
HOLTTUM, R.E. 1947. A revised classification of the leptosporangiate
ferns. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 53: 123-158.
HOLTTUM, R.E. 1959. Vegetative characters distinguishing the vari-
ous groups of ferns in Dryopteris of Christensen's Index fil-
icum, and other ferns of similar habit and sori. Gardens Bul-
letin, Singapore 17: 361-367.
HOLTTUM, R.E. 1973. Posing the problems. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 61 , Suppl. Vol. 1: 173-189.
HUTCHINGS, M.J. 1997. Resource allocation in clonal herbs and their
consequence for growth. In F.A. Bazzaz & J. Grace, Plant
resource allocation'. 161-189. Academic Press, San Diego.
KHULLAR, S.P. & GUPTA, S.C. 1979. Morphological studies of some
Himalayan polystichums. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 63,2: 41-58.
KRAMER, K.U. 1987. A brief survey of the dromy in fern leaves, with
an expanded terminology. Botanica Helvetica 92: 219-228.
KRAMER, K.U. 1990. Dryopteridaceae. In K. Kubitzki, The families
and genera of vascular plants 1. Pteridophytes and Gymno-
sperms: 101-144. (K.U. Kramer & P.S. Green, volume editors).
Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
LIN, B.L. & DE VOL, C.E. 1977. The use of stipe characters in fem
taxonomy I. Taiwania 22: 91-99.
LIN, B.L. & DE VOL, C.E. 1978. The use of stipe characters in fem
taxonomy II. Taiwania 23: 77-95.
MEHRA, P.N. & SONI, S.L. 1983. Stomatal patterns in pterido-
phytes— an evolutionary approach. Proceedings of the Indian
National Science Academy, Part B, 49: 155-203.
68
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
METCALFE, C.R. & CHALK, L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons.
Claredon Press, Oxford.
MICKEL, J.T. 1997. A review of the West Indian species of Poly-
stichum. In R.J. Johns, Holttum Memorial Volume : 119- 143.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
MICKEL, J.T. & LERSTEN, N.R. 1967. Floating stomates (adenosto-
my) in ferns: distribution and ontogeny. American Journal of
Botany 54: 1181-1185.
MITSUTA, S. 1977. Evolution of simple fronds in Cyrtomium — a pat-
tern morphological study. Acta Phytotaxonomica Geobotanica
28: 131-142.
MOORE, T. 1855. A popular history of British ferns and allied plants.
Reeve, London.
NAYAR, B.K. 1970. A phylogenetic classification of the homosporous
ferns. Taxon 19: 229-236.
NAYAR, B.K. 1979. The classification of ferns: its present status and
problems. In S.S. Bir, Aspects of Plant Sciences 3: 1-38.
NOODEN, L.D. & WAGNER, W.H. 1997. Photosynthetic capacity and
leaf re-orientation in two wintergreen ferns, Polystichum acros-
tichoides and Dryopteris intermedia. American Fern Journal
87: 143-149.
PANT, D.D. & KHARE, P.K. 1969. Epidermal structure and stomatal
ontogeny in some eusporangiate ferns. Annals of Botany 33:
795-805.
PICHI SERMOLLI, R.E.G. 1972. Fragmenta pteridologiae III. Webbia
27: 389-460.
PICHI SERMOLLI, R.E.G. 1977. Fragmenta pteridologiae VII. Web-
bia 32: 69-93.
PRYER, K.M., SMITH, A.R. & SKOG, J.E. 1995. Phylogenetic rela-
tionships of extant ferns based on evidence from morphological
and rbcL sequences. American Fern Journal 85: 205-282.
SCHMID, R. 1982. The terminology and classification of steles: his-
torical perspective and the outlines of a system. Botanical
Review 48: 817-931.
SCHNEIDER, H. 1996. The root anatomy of ferns: a comparative
study. In J.M. Camus, M. Gibby & R.J. Johns, Pteridology in
perspective : 271-283. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
SEN, U. & HENNIPMAN, E. 1981. Structure and ontogeny of stoma-
ta in Polypodiaceae. Blumea 27: 175-201.
STACE, C.A. 1984. The taxonomic importance of the leaf surface. In
V.H. Heywood & D.M. Moore, Current concepts in plant tax-
onomy. 67-94. The Systematics Association Special Volume
No. 25. Academic Press, London/Orlando.
TRYON, R.M. & TRYON, A.F. 1982. Ferns and allied plants with
special reference to tropical America. Springer- Verlag, New
York.
VAN COTTHEM, W.R.J. 1970. Comparative morphological study of
the fem stomata in the Filicopsida. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique
National de Belgique 40: 81-239.
WAGNER, D.H. 1979. Systematics of Polystichum in western North
America north of Mexico. Pteridologia 1: 1-64.
WAGNER, W.H. 1979. Reticulate veins in the systematics of modem
ferns. Taxon 28: 87-95.
WAGNER, W.H. 1985. Morphological variation and evolution in
Polystichum. In D.S. Barrington, The present evolutionary and
taxonomic status of the fem genus Polystichum: The 1984
Botanical Society of America Pteridophyte Section Sympo-
sium. American Fern Journal 75: 22-28.
WAGNER, W.H. & JOHNSON, D.M. 1983. Trophopod, a commonly
overlooked storage structure of potential systematic value. Taxon
32: 268, 269.
WIDEN, C.J., MITSUTA, S. & IWATSUKI, K. 198 1 . Chemotaxonomic
studies on Arachniodes (Dryopteridaceae) III. Phloroglucinol
derivatives of putative hybrids. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo)
94: 127-139.
YATSKIEVYCH, G. 1989. A new combination in South American Poly-
stichum. American Fern Journal 79: 26, 27.
YATSKIEVYCH, G. 1996. A revision of the fem genus Phanerophle-
bia (Dryopteridaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gar-
den 83: 168-199.
Bothalia 30,1:69-86 (2000)
The epidermis in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function
and taxonomic significance
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: anatomy, cuticle, epicuticular waxes, epidermis, Passerina, southern Africa, stomata, taxonomy, Thymelaeaceae
ABSTRACT
Epidermal features were studied in all 1 7 species of Passerina , a genus endemic to southern Africa. Leaves in Passerina
are inversely ericoid, the adaxial surface concave and the abaxial surface convex. Leaves are inversely dorsiventral and
epistomatic. The adaxial epidermis is villous, with unicellular, uniseriate trichomes and relatively small thin-walled cells,
promoting flexibility of leaf margins owing to turgor changes. In common with many other Thymelaeaceae, abaxial epi-
dermal cells are large and tanniniferous with mucilaginous cell walls. The cuticle is adaxially thin, but abaxially well devel-
oped, probably enabling the leaf to restrict water loss and to tolerate high light intensity and UV-B radiation. Epicuticular
waxes, present in all species, comprise both soft and plate waxes. Epidermal structure proves to be taxonomically impor-
tant at family, genus and species levels. Interspecific differences include arrangement of stomata and presence or absence
of abaxial epidermal hair. Other diagnostic characters of the abaxial epidermal cells are arrangement, size and shape, cutic-
ular ornamentation and presence or absence of wax platelets. Two groups of species on the basis of abaxial epidermal cell
orientation are recognised. Many leaf epidermal features in Passerina are interpreted as structural adaptations to the
Mediterranean climate of the Cape.
CONTENTS
Introduction 69
Material and methods 71
Light microscope studies (LM) 71
Scanning electron microscope studies (SEM) .... 72
Transmission electron microscope studies (TEM) . 72
Terminology 72
Trichome structure 72
Cuticle 72
Cuticular ornamentation 72
Epicuticular wax 72
Results 72
Macromorphology of the leaf 72
Anatomy of the leaf 73
Adaxial (dorsal) epidermis 73
Cuticle 73
Epidermal cells 73
Stomatal complex 73
Trichomes 75
Abaxial (ventral) epidermis 75
Trichomes 75
Epidermal cells 75
Cuticle 77
Cuticular ornamentation 79
Epicuticular waxes 79
Discussion 79
Adaxial epidermis 79
Stomatal complex 79
Trichomes 81
Cuticular ornamentation 81
Epicuticular waxes 83
Functions of epicuticular waxes 84
Systematic value 84
Ecological aspects of leaf epidermis 84
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J, Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany, University
of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-06-07.
Conclusions 85
Acknowledgements 85
References 85
INTRODUCTION
The genus Passerina L. comprises about 17 species, all
endemic to southern Africa (Thoday 1924; Bond &
Goldblatt 1984). Despite the now outdated revision by
Thoday (1924), taxonomic boundaries in Passerina remain
a problem, mainly owing to the apparent lack of marked
morphological differences between the species. The pre-
sent paper emanates from a comparative leaf-anatomical
survey of the genus, undertaken as part of a monographic
study of the group. This survey highlighted the importance
of the epidermis as a source of taxonomic evidence.
The combined distribution of all the Passerina species
is shown in Figure 1. Most species of Passerina are
FIGURE 1 — Number of species per grid in the distribution of Passerina.
Lines PQ and RS: boundaries between summer (A), intermediate
(B) and winter (C) rainfall areas. Line XY shows northern bound-
ary of Cape Supergroup rock outcrops.
70
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 1 . — Passerina specimens examined and housed at PRE
Material used for the SEM study of the ad- and abaxial epidermises. +Fresh material collected for the TEM study.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
71
endemic to the Cape Floristic Region. From here the dis-
tribution of P.filiformis and P. montana extends east and
north along the eastern mountains and Great Escarpment
of southern Africa. In the Cape the climate is for the most
part Mediterranean or semi-Mediterranean. In the west, it
rains in winter; along the south coast, winter rainfall is
complemented by some summer rain which increases
eastwards. The western Karoo and Namaqualand (Suc-
culent Karoo Biome) are characterised by winter precipi-
tation and summer drought. KwaZulu-Natal and the east-
ern mountains of southern Africa are predominantly sum-
mer rainfall areas. Distribution of the species of
Passerina coincides with the geography and climate
along the whole distribution area. P. ericoides, P.
paleacea, P. paludosa, P. galpinii and P. burchellii are
endemic to Western Cape. The first three species are
found along beaches and salt marshes only, P. galpinii
grows mainly on calcrete in the Agulhas Plain area
(Goldblatt & Manning in press) and P. burchellii is found
on the high mountains at Genadendal and Villiersdorp.
P. comosa grows on mountain slopes and summits in the
Kamiesberg, Great Winterhoek and Klein Swartberg
Ranges. P. glomerata is found from Worcester to Tul-
bagh, in the Clanwilliam area and extends to the
Witteberg south of Matjiesfontein. P. obtusifolia is ubiqui-
tous in the Cape, distributed from Worcester in Western
Cape to Alice in Eastern Cape and on some of the moun-
tain ranges in and around the Little Karoo. A new species,
of which the plants are often buried under snow during
winter, grows at high altitudes in the Ceres Karoo. P. vul-
garis is a pioneer with a wide distribution from Western
Cape to East London in Eastern Cape. P. falcifolia is
found on mountain ranges between George and Uiten-
hage and P. pendula is endemic to the KwaZunga
Catchment Basin and the Zwartkops River area of Eastern
Cape. P. rubra is common in the Port Elizabeth to
Uitenhage area, with outliers in the Swellendam and
Bredasdorp Districts. P. drakensbergensis is endemic to
the high Drakensberg in the Bergville District of
KwaZulu-Natal and P. rigida is distributed all along the
coast, from northern KwaZulu-Natal to the Cape
Peninsula. Passerina sp. nov. 2 is found on the northern
Cederberg Mountains, P. sp. nov. 3 at mountain tops in the
Uitenhage area and the Swartberg Pass and P. sp. nov. 4
on the Kouga Mountains and the Montagu Pass.
The most important studies applying the ‘anatomical
method’ for the delimitation of the Thymelaeaceae were
published by Van Tieghem (1893) and Supprian (1894).
The presence of mucilaginous epidermal cells in P. eri-
coides (= Chymococca empetroides Meisn.) as opposed
to the total lack thereof in the other species, was also
mentioned by Supprian (1894). Subsequently, Gilg
(1894) critically discussed the ‘anatomical method’ as
applied by Van Tieghem (1893) and Supprian (1894) for
the delimitation of the Thymelaeaceae and concluded that
certain characters would not uphold criticism. He regard-
ed former systems based on floral morphology as more
suitable for a taxonomic grouping of the Thymelaeaceae.
The twentieth century yielded very little anatomical
work on the Thymelaeaceae. Standard works were those
of Solereder (1908) and Metcalfe & Chalk (1950, 1979).
Thoday (1921) described the structure and behaviour in
drought of the ericoid leaves of P. filiformis and P. cf.
falcifolia ; he also supplied some notes on their anatomy.
In a discussion of inversely dorsiventral leaves, Kugler
(1928) included a description of the leaves of P. fili-
formis (= P. pectinata Hort.). More recently, leaf anato-
my of the genera Lachnaea L. and Cryptadenia Meisn.
was treated by Beyers (1992) and leaf and involucral
bract characters of systematic use in Gnidia L. were
studied by Beaumont et al. (1994). The scanty informa-
tion on leaf anatomy in Thymelaeaceae calls for further
research in this field, especially in the genus Passerina.
Previous leaf anatomical studies identified mucilagi-
nation of the epidermal cells as being of possible taxo-
nomic importance. Recently Bredenkamp & Van Wyk
(1999) clarified the structure of the epidermal cells and
origin of the mucilage, concluding that mucilagination of
epidermal cells is of taxonomic importance mainly at the
family level.
The wide distribution of Passerina in the Cape Floris-
tic Region, along the southern and eastern coastline and
along the Great Escarpment of southern Africa as far north
as Zimbabwe, illustrates the adaptation of these plants to a
wide range of habitats, including Mediterranean and sum-
mer rainfall regimes. Decreasing rainfall from the eastern
Escarpment to the northwestern Cape is reflected by adap-
tive changes in the leaf structure of the group. The present
paper provides a description of epidermal characters in
Passerina as well as an assessment of their taxonomic sig-
nificance. It also speculates on the possible adaptive value
of the observed structural features of the leaf.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Fresh leaf material of 17 species of Passerina (Table 1)
was collected, fixed and stored in a 0.1 M phosphate-
buffered solution at pH 7.4, containing 2.5% formalde-
hyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde and 0.5% caffeine [modified
Karnovsky fixative; Karnovsky (1965)]. Whenever possi-
ble, material from at least five different localities was
collected, fixed and air-dried for each species and
herbarium specimens were made.
Light microscope (LM) studies
The LM was used for general leaf anatomy as well as
epidermal studies. Unless stated otherwise, the tenth leaf
from the growing point of a twig was used in all com-
parative studies. To prepare transverse sections of the
main vein as well as both leaf margins, a 1 mm wide seg-
ment of leaf material was cut from the centre of each
leaf. Samples were dehydrated, embedded in glycol
methacrylate (GMA) and sectioned according to the
methods of Feder & O’Brien (1968). Sections were
stained with the periodic acid/Schiff’s reaction and in
toluidine blue ‘O’, then mounted in Entellan (Art. 7961,
E. Merck, Darmstadt).
The following three methods were followed in the
study of the cuticles:
1. GMA transverse sections of leaves were stained for
10 minutes in 1% Sudan Black B dissolved in 70%
ethanol. Sections were rinsed twice in 70% ethanol for a
few seconds and mounted in glycerine jelly.
72
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
2. Cuticular mounts were obtained by maceration
according to the method of Kiger (1971). Specimens
were slightly over-stained in a 1% acqueous safranin
solution, dehydrated in methyl cellusolve and mounted
in Entellan.
3. Epidermal mounts were obtained by removing
small pieces of ad- and abaxial epidermis manually and
by paradermal hand sections. Epidermises were stained
in 1% safranin dissolved in 50% ethanol, dehydrated in a
graded ethanol series and mounted in Entellan.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies
The SEM was used to study the epidermal surface
features (including epicuticular waxes), as well as to ver-
ify the structure of the cuticle. Leaves from air-dried
material were used for all species. Whole leaves were
used as they are small and ericoid, but trichomes were
manually removed adaxially to reveal the stomata.
Leaves were mounted onto aluminium stubs with silver
paint, exposing the ad- and abaxial surfaces separately
and sputter-coated with gold. For the purpose of studying
epicuticular waxes, the sputter-coating process was mod-
ified to prevent high temperatures from changing the
wax surfaces. Specimens were sputter-coated for 30 sec-
onds and left to retain their normal temperature for one
minute. This was repeated five times after which the
specimens were viewed with a Jeol 840 SEM.
For the verification of the authenticity of epicuticular
wax droplets and small round protrusions observed in
certain species of Passerina, leaves were washed in chlo-
roform for one minute, before they were pasted onto alu-
minium stubs. The procedure described above was used
for sputter-coating and viewing.
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) studies
The TEM was used for the study of the structure of
mucilaginous epidermal cell walls in Passerina. The sec-
ond, fifth and tenth leaf from the growing points of
P. ericoides, P. falcifolia and P. paleacea were used to
study the structure of the cell wall. Leaf segments of
± 1 mm2 were fixed in a modified Kamovsky fixative
(Karnovsky 1965). Fixed material was rinsed in 0.075 M
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4-7. 5, post-fixed for one hour in
0.25% aqueous OsCL, washed in three changes of water,
dehydrated in a graded acetone series and embedded in
Quetol 651 resin (Van der Merwe & Coetzee 1992).
Ultrathin sections were contrasted in 4% aqueous uranyl
acetate for 10 minutes and rapidly rinsed in water three
times. The sections were then contrasted with lead citrate
(Reynolds 1963), rinsed in water and examined with a
Phillips 301 TEM.
For the verification of wettability and possible
absorption of water by laminar epidermal hairs, we fol-
low Alvin (1987). He proposed a mechanism through
which water is absorbed by the specialised abaxial epi-
dermal trichomes of Androstachys johnsonii Prain. This
process involves the wettability of the hairs which he
investigated by spraying the glabrous adaxial surfaces of
the leaves with water. Water seeped round the leaf mar-
gins to the abaxial surface, wetting approximately 50%
of the abaxial surface within 5 minutes. In the present
study, the glabrous abaxial surfaces of five cymbiform
leaves (from dried herbarium specimens) were pasted
onto a sticky surface, exposing the villous concave adax-
ial surface. A drop of water was placed in the adaxial
groove at the base of each leaf (average leaf size 2.5 x
4.0 mm) and left overnight. This experiment was repeat-
ed using 0.5% aqueous safranin, followed after 20 min-
utes by a rinse with water.
Terminology
Trichome structure
We have followed the terminology of Stace (1965)
and Theobald et al. (1979).
Cuticle
Although the interpretation proposed by Martin &
Juniper (1970) for the cuticle of plants has been widely
followed by many workers, Holloway (1982) reviewed
the historical perspective of the plant cuticle and attempt-
ed to adopt the most workable interpretation of the cutic-
ular membrane (CM) in practice. In response, we follow
Jeffree (1986), whose uncomplicated and pragmatic inter-
pretation distinguishes three main zones, namely the cuti-
cle proper, the cuticular layer and the cell wall. The cutic-
ular membrane comprises the cuticle proper plus the
cuticular layer and is bonded to the outer periclinal walls
of the epidermal cells by a pectin-rich layer, which is
equivalent to the continuous middle lamella. A layer of
epicuticular wax generally coats the cuticle proper.
Cuticular ornamentation ( LM and SEM )
We follow Wilkinson (1979) in our choice of termi-
nology to describe cuticular ornamentation.
Epicuticular wax
The recognition of soft waxes in the present study is
based on the criteria proposed by Amelunxen et al.
(1967), Wilkinson (1979) and Barthlott et al. (1998).
RESULTS
Macromorphology of the leaf
Leaf arrangement decussate, sometimes imbricate,
closely adherent to stem or spreading at angle of
5°-20°(-60°); spreading of leaves often prominent in juve-
nile plants. Lamina inversely ericoid; adaxial surface con-
cave, often forming a groove facing stem and lined with
woolly hairs; abaxial surface convex, orientated more or
less acroscopically, thus exposing a large surface area to
the environment; cuticle often amber-coloured (in herbari-
um material) and outline of epidermal cells often macro-
scopically visible. Leaf shape cymbiform (boat-shaped),
falcate or cigar-shaped; plane shape linear, oblong, lanceo-
late, ovate or trullate. Leaf base sessile or cuneate. Leaf
apex truncate and hump-backed, obtuse, rounded, acumi-
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
73
nate or acute to almost spine-tipped. Margins sometimes
ciliate. Size (1.5-)2.5-4.0(-8.0) x (0.8-)1.2-2.0(-3.0) mm.
Anatomy of the leaf
Transverse section (LM): leaves epistomatic. Adaxial
epidermis concave, villous, with unicellular, uniseriate tri-
chomes; cuticle relatively thin, 2-5 pm; epidermal cells
uniserial, relatively small (10—) 1 5— 25(— 35) x 1 0— 1 7(— 20)
pm; vacuoles large with tanniniferous substances, cell
walls thin; stomata present, with guard cells at same level,
sunken below, or raised above adjacent epidermal cells.
Abaxial epidermis convex, glabrous or sparsely hairy; cuti-
cle relatively thick ( 1 0— )20 — 40(— 70) pm; epidermal cells
relatively large, periclinal diam. of cells (20-)30-60(-65)
pm, anticlinal diam. (25-)30-75 (-105) pm (Table 2), tan-
niniferous, often with mucilaginous cell walls. Mesophyll
inversely dorsiventral (Kugler 1928); spongy parenchyma
situated adaxially and palisade parenchyma abaxially.
Main vascular bundle collateral, surrounded by parenchy-
matous bundle sheath with ample amounts of tanniniferous
substances; bundle sheath adaxially irregularly biseriate,
abaxially strengthened by sclerenchyma. Secondary vascu-
lar bundles ± 6; bundle sheaths irregular, parenchymatous
and tanniniferous. Figure 2A, B.
Adaxial (dorsal) epidermis
Cuticle
Transverse section (LM): cuticular membrane 2-5
pm thick, smooth, ridged along boundaries of guard cells
(Figure 2G), gradually thickening close to leaf margins,
equalling abaxial cuticle in thickness and sculpturing at
margins.
Surface view (LM and SEM): smooth (Figure 2C),
except in Passerina sp. nov. 1, where markings on epi-
cuticular wax are most probably caused by snow (Figure
3D, E).
Epidermal cells
Transverse section (LM): cells uniserial, irregularly
shaped,- relatively small with periclinal diam. (10-)
1 5— 25(— 35) pm, anticlinal diam. 10—1 7(— 20) pm; cell
walls thin, outer periclinal wall convex; vacuoles large,
containing tanniniferous substances (Figure 2A, F-H).
Margin formed by a few rows of conically shaped or
anticlinally elongated cells.
Surface view (LM and SEM): cells polygonal,
4-many-sided, walls usually undulate with loose, wide
u-shaped curves of shallow amplitude (Figures 2D, K;
3C), arranged in rows and straight-walled in Passerina
sp. nov. 1 (Figure 3D, E). Nodular walls observed in P.
falcifolia (Figure 2D). Vacuoles with ample tanninifer-
ous substances.
Stomatal complex
Transverse section (LM): lamina epistomatic; stoma-
ta dispersed randomly over adaxial surface, but absent
from edges of leaf margin; raised or at same level as
other epidermal cells (Figure 2E-H); dispersed in two
columns in adaxial epidermal folds, with ± 3-5 rows of
epidermal cells in between; raised, sunken or arranged in
stomatal crypts in Passerina sp. nov. 1 (Figure 3F).
Guard cell outline in all species varying between widely
obtrullate, very widely obtrullate or widely depressed
obtrullate, with angles slightly rounded; cell walls thick-
TABLE 2. — Dimensions of abaxial epidermal cells and cuticular membrane (CM) in Passerina. Measurements in pm in cross section
and surface view
74
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
' ♦
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
75
ened (Figure 2F, H); periclinal and anticlinal dimensions
for individual guard cells 1 0.0— 1 2.5(— 1 5.0) x ( 1 0.0—)
12.5-1 5. 0(-20.0) (irn. Cuticular membrane (Figures 2G;
3B) covering outer periclinal walls of epidermal and
guard cells, as well as poral epidermal walls of guard
cells, smooth or slightly crenate when lining the pore
(Figure 3B), contracted into a pair of ± continuous outer
stomatal ledges above guard cells, thus forming an entire
outer cavity (not divided into compartments); inner
stomatal ledges and inner cavity present. Epidermal cells
surrounding guard cells not different from other epider-
mal cells in size, shape or staining properties (Figure 2F).
Peristomatal cuticular rims conspicuous on epidermal
cells bordering guard cells (Figure 2G).
Surface view (LM and SEM): stomata anomocytic;
outline elliptic to circular, dimensions (20-)26-30(-35)
x (15-)24-30(-35) pm, circular in Passerina sp. nov. 1,
dimensions 27.5 x 27.5 pm. Epidermal cells surrounding
guard cells 3-5(6), irregularly shaped with sinuate walls
and long axis parallel to guard cells, corresponding in
orientation, size, shape and staining properties to other ±
elongated epidermal cells (Figures 2D, K; 3C); pentago-
nal to heptagonal epidermal cells in Passerina sp. nov. 1,
with walls slightly sinuate to straight, possibly nodular
(Figure 3E). Stomata raised above or at same level as
other epidermal cells in all species (Figure 21, J, L); dis-
persed in two columns in adaxial epidermal folds, with
± 3-5 rows of epidermal cells in between, sunken or
arranged in stomatal crypts in Passerina sp. nov. 1
(Figure 3D). Guard cells often conspicuously raised
(Figure 21, J). Peristomatal cuticular rims conspicuous
on epidermal cells bordering guard cells (Figures 21, L;
3A), rims also visible as 1-4 small semilunar protrusions
bordering guard cells in cuticular preparations and epi-
dermal peels (Figure 3C) (rims should not be confused
with small subsidiary cells, an interpretation which could
result in stomata being erroneously classified as paracy-
tic or cyclocytic). Outer stomatal ledges ± continuous,
present above guard cells (Figures 2I-L; 3A, C).
Stomatal poles (where guard cells meet) retuse; T-pieces
(cuticular thickenings of common walls between guard
cells) well developed (Figures 21, J, L; 3C).
Trichomes
LM and SEM: adaxial surface of leaf villous. Tri-
chomes nonglandular, unbranched, devoid of surface fea-
tures or constrictions, mostly strongly spiralled (Figure
3G, H), terete, with central lumen, covered by cuticle
(Figures 2G; 31). Hair bases with pore, poral rim some-
what thickened (Figures 2C; 3C, G); hair base cells most-
ly 4-6 and slightly radially elongated (Figure 3C, G).
Trichomes bordering leaf margin conspicuous in
P. burchellii , P. paludosa and P. pendula (Figure 31, J).
Trichome foot scarcely modified, inserted between epi-
dermal cells (Figure 31), usually straight, but with indi-
vidual trichomes strongly spiralled (Figure 3J) in P. pen-
dula (brown in dried material).
Wettability and the possible absorption of water by
the laminar epidermal hairs in Passerina were assessed
by means of laboratory tests. We found that water had
formed a film over the felty layer of hair at the leaf base,
whereas the adaxial surface had remained dry. A treat-
ment with 0.5% aqueous safranin revealed that only the
exposed parts of the spiralised hairs in the felty indu-
mentum at the leaf bases stained pinkish. Although the
longer hairs at the leaf margins were stained, those on the
rest of the adaxial surface remained unstained.
Abaxial (ventral) epidermis
Trichomes
Abaxial surfaces of bracts and young leaves in P.
comosa , P. sp. nov. 3 and P. sp. nov. 4 tomentose to
sparsely hairy (Figure 4B), older leaves often glabrous.
Description of trichomes as described under adaxial epi-
dermis.
Epidermal cells
Transverse section (LM and TEM) (Figures 2A, B, E;
3K-L): epidermis uniserial. Stomata absent. Epidermal
cells more or less oblong in outline; outer periclinal walls
straight or convex, inner periclinal walls straight, convex
or bulging towards mesophyll, often mucilaginous and
then superficially resembling a multiple epidermis; peri-
clinal diam. of cells (20-)30-60(-65) pm, anticlinal
dianr. (25— )30— 75(— 1 05) pm (Table 2). Mucilaginous
cell walls increasing progressively from leaf margin to
midrib (Figure 2B), affecting mainly inner periclinal but
also anticlinal cell walls (Figure 3K, L); mucilage with a
layered appearance (Figures 2E; 3K), eventually occupy-
ing about two-thirds of epidermal cell and separated
from cytoplasm by innermost cellulose layer of inner
periclinal cell wall (Figure 3L). Cytoplasm compressed
by mucilage, remaining as a thin layer appressed to large,
usually tanniniferous vacuole. Anticlinal layer of inner
periclinal cell wall often plicate but gradually straighten-
ing and often disappearing as mucilagination increases,
eventually breaking under pressure of accumulating
FIGURE 2. — LM photographs and SEM micrographs of epidermis of inversely ericoid leaf in Passerina. A, P. falcifolia , Bredenkamp 91 7, ad-
and abaxial epidermis with mucilage accumulating abaxially; B, P. galpinii, Bredenkamp 946, mucilaginous abaxial epidermal cells; C,
P. filiformis, Bredenkamp 1016, smooth adaxial cuticle, stomata and poral rims of hair bases; D, P. falcifolia, Bredenkamp 915, adaxial
epidermal walls undulate, nodular; E, P. ericoides, Taylor 4042, stomata at different levels in relation to adaxial epidermis; F, P. comosa,
Bredenkamp 1034, PAS staining of guard cell walls and surrounding epidermal cells, showing width; G, P pendula, Bredenkamp 909, t/s
adaxial epidermis stained with Sudan Black B, showing cuticular membrane; H, P. pendula, Bredenkamp 909, raised stomata stained with
toluidine blue; I, P. paleacea, Bredenkamp 961, with peristomatal rim, raised epidermal and poral walls of guard cells, conspicuous outer
stomatal ledges; J, P. galpinii, Bredenkamp 946, with distinct outer stomatal ledge aperture; K, P. filiformis, Bredenkamp 1016, and L,
P. pendula, Bredenkamp 909, with T-pieces at stomatal poles. Abbreviations: ad, adaxial epidermis; ab, abaxial epidermis; CM, cuticular
membrane; e, epidermal cell; egc, epidermal wall of guard cell; es, epidermal cell surrounding guard cell; gc, guard cell; ic, inner cavity;
il, inner stomatal ledge; 1, lumen of trichome; m, mucilage; oc, outer stomatal cavity; ol, outer stomatal ledge; ola, outer stomatal ledge
aperture; p, pore; pgc, poral wall of guard cell; pr, trichome poral rim; ps, peristomatal rim; s, stomata; sc, stomatal crypt; t, trichome; T,
T-piece at stomatal pole. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, F, K, 100 pm; C, G, H, I, J, L, 10 pm.
76
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
77
TABLE 3. — Abaxial epidermal characters in Passerina
Abax-
ial
hair
pre-
sent
Epicuticular
remains of epidermal cells and adjacent mesophyll
(Figure 2 A) (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999).
Surface view (SEM micrographs and cuticular prepara-
tions): shape pentagonal to heptagonal, cells mostly isodia-
metric or transversely oblong in P. glomerata, P. ericoides
(Figure 4D, E) and P. obtusifolia (Figure 4G, H), but oblong
in P. burchellii (Figure 4J, K); cells mostly slightly oblong
or oblong in all other species of Passerina (Figure 5; Table
2). Arrangement random in P. glomerata, P. ericoides , P.
obtusifolia and P. burchellii (Figure 4D-K), in rows in all
other species of Passerina (Figure 5; Table 3).
Cuticle
Transverse section (LM): epicuticular wax absent
owing to chemical treatment during fixation, embedding
and staining. Cuticular membrane (CM) well devel-
oped, ( 1 0— )20— 30(— 70) pm thick (Table 2); cuticle prop-
er delineated by narrow, lightly stained outer zone and
cuticular layer by wider, darker stained zone; cuticular
pegs present, formed by layer projecting into grooves
between anticlinal walls of adjacent epidermal cells.
Outer periclinal cell walls not staining with Sudan
Black B (Figures 41; 5C, I, L).
TEM: cuticle structure corresponding to the cuticular
structural type 3, described by Holloway (1982). Cuticle
proper and CM not distinguishable. Cuticular membrane
(Figure 4A) comprising a wide, mainly amorphous outer
zone and narrow faintly reticulate inner zone; osmio-
philic granules aligned on border of clearly defined cell
wall; cuticular pegs with unknown (possibly pectina-
ceous) substance (stained light grey) between cell wall
and peg, forming part of middle lamella.
FIGURE 3. — LM photographs and SEM micrographs in Passerina. A-F, structure of stomatal complex. A-C, P. rigida , Bredenkamp 1013, Ward
7211\ A, surface view of stomata showing peristomatal rims, raised guard cells and pronounced outer stomatal ledges; B, t/s adaxial epider-
mis stained with Sudan Black B, with crenate surface of cuticular membrane lining poral walls of guard cells; C, epidermal maceration
stained with safranin, showing structure of epidermal cells surrounding guard cells, peristomatal rims. D-F, Passerina sp. nov. 1,
Bredenkamp 1046: D, sunken stomata in cavity of cymbiform leaf; E, epidermal maceration stained with safranin, with structure of epider-
mal cells and sunken stomata; F, t/s leaf, with raised stomata as well as stomatal crypts. G-J, structure of trichomes. G, P. rubra , Bredenkamp
905 , with poral rims in relation to adaxial epidermal cells. H, P . falcifolia, Bredenkamp 915, with unicellular, long, spiralised, pointed tri-
chomes; I, P. paludosa , Bredenkamp 1035, with trichome foot and conspicuous lumen; J, P. pendula, Bredenkamp 909, trichomes strongly
spiralised. K, L, TEM micrographs of abaxial leaf epidermal cells of P . falcifolia, Bredenkamp 917, in cross section: K, mucilage accumu-
lated between innermost and outermost cellulose layers of inner periclinal cell wall; L, innermost cellulose layer of inner periclinal cell wall.
Abbreviations: aw, anticlinal cell wall; cy, cytoplasm; iip, innermost layer of inner periclinal cell wall; oip, outer layer of inner periclinal cell
wall; m, mucilage; op, outer periclinal cell wall; v, vacuole. Scale bars: K, L 5 pm; A, B, H, 10 pm; C-F, G, I, J, 100 pm.
78
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Bothalia 30, 1 (2000)
79
Cuticular ornamentation
In transections and surface view of leaves, LM and
SEM studies showed that two groups of species, hence-
forth called Groups A, Intermediate and B (Table 3), can
be distinguished on the basis of the arrangement and
shape of epidermal cells as well as cuticular ornamenta-
tion.
Group A
Epidermal cells mostly isodiametric or transversely
oblong in surface view; arranged randomly; cuticle most-
ly papillate; outer per iclinal walls of cells convex in all
species. Cuticular membrane (CM) smooth in P. eri-
coides and P. glomerata (Figures 4D-F; 6C); papillate in
P. obtusifolia, with one dome per cell, situated ± central-
ly on outer periclinal wall of pentagonal or heptagonal
cells (Figures 4G-I; 6E); with several domes per cell in
P. burchellii (Figures 4J-L; 6F).
Group B
Epidermal cells mostly oblong in surface view,
arranged in rows; concavities (depressions in centre
region of cell) and convexities (roundish cells forming a
low dome) more or less alternating (Figure 5G, J); cuti-
cle with ridges at junction of epidermal cell walls most-
ly conspicuously raised, exhibiting a definite striate pat-
tern (Figure 5D, G, J), otherwise ± plane.
Cuticular membrane pronounced at junctions of epi-
dermal cell walls and grooved between anticlinal walls
of adjacent cells (Figure 51), more or less smooth in P.
vulgaris , P.filifonnis, P.falcifolia, P. pendula, P. rigida,
and P. galpinii , except in Passerina sp. nov. 1, in which
the presence of snow, at the time of collecting, seemed to
have caused markings on the cuticular wax (Figure 5D,
E). Small globular papillae visible between cuticular
ridges in Passerina sp. nov. 1 (Figure 5D-E), P. rubra ,
P. paleacea and P. paludosa (Figure 5J-L).
Intermediate
Epidermal cells arranged in rows but CM less pro-
nounced at junctions of epidermal cell walls and cuticu-
lar ridges less conspicuous, were recorded in P. comosa
(Figures 4B; 6A, B), P. drakensbergensis (Figure 5A, B),
P. montana, P. sp. nov. 3 and P. sp. nov. 4. CM smooth
or with small globular papillae in P. montana and P. sp.
nov. 4; domed with a ‘molar’ -like crown in P. comosa
(Figure 4B, C), with several domes per cell in P. sp. nov.
3 and with 9 or 10 globular papillae per cell in P. drak-
ensbergensis (Figures 5A-C; 6G).
Epicuticular waxes
Soft waxes present, coating entire abaxial surface:
wax protruding through amorphous layer of CM in a
variety of configurations: droplets conspicuous in P.
comosa , P. ericoides and P. burchellii (Figure 6A, D, F);
droplets and small round protrusions forming flat, shape-
less lumps in P. paleacea (Figure 6L). Crystalloids: wax
platelets and plates present or absent (Table 3); thin wax
platelets, with margins entire or non-entire, flaking from
wax surface in P. comosa and P. rigida (Figure 6A, J)
and changing to plates as margins become distinctly
edged. Upright plates separating from surrounding wax
in P.filiformis (Figure 6H). Platelets and plates varying
from sparse to abundant; platelets ± square to irregularly
shaped, plates ± square to oblong and usually arranged
perpendicular to cell rows.
The authenticity of epicuticular wax droplets and
small round protrusions, observed in P. ericoides,
P. obtusifolia and P. paleacea (Figure 7), was verified by
washing leaves in chloroform for one minute and com-
paring them to unwashed specimens under SEM.
Epicuticular wax droplets were clearly discernible in
unwashed P. paleacea (Figure 7A), while small pores
appeared in the cleaned, de-waxed cuticle after washing
(Figure 7B-E). Similar pores were also present in P. eri-
coides (Figure 7F). No pores were present in the papil-
late CM of P. obtusifolia, but the corroded apices of the
papillae clearly showed an accumulation of epicuticular
waxes at these points (Figure 7G-I).
DISCUSSION
Adaxial epidermis
Plants of high mountains in the tropics usually have
straight to curved anticlinal epidermal cell walls, the per-
centage of species with undulated walls increasing as
altitude decreases (Wilkinson 1979). The straight-walled
arrangement of the cells in Passerina sp. nov. 1 (Figure
3D, E), a high-altitude montane species, seems to com-
ply with this pattern.
Stomata! complex
In all but one species of Passerina the stomata are usu-
ally raised or at the same level as other epidermal cells
(Figure 2E, G, H), indicating that this character is of lim-
FIGURE 4. — A, TEM micrograph of cuticular membrane in Passerina paleacea, Bredenkamp 961 , with wide, amorphous outside zone, narrow
faintly reticulate inner zone, osmiophilic granules at border of cell wall and cuticular peg. B-L, LM photographs and SEM micrographs
of abaxial leaf epidermis in Passerina. Epidermal macerations stained with safranin and t/s of epidermis stained with Sudan Black B. B,
C, P. comosa, MacDonald 2125, Andraea 1288: B, trichomes present; C, CM domed, with ‘molar-like’ crown to each dome. D-F, P. eri-
coides, Bredenkamp 956, 962, Taylor 4042: D, CM smooth, epidermal cells randomly arranged, ± isodiametric, outer periclinal cell walls
convex; E, cells randomly arranged, ± isodiametric; F, convex outer periclinal walls and smooth CM. G-I, P. obtusifolia, Bredenkamp
1034: G, CM with one dome per cell; H, epidermal cells randomly arranged, transversely oblong with one dome per cell; I, convex outer
periclinal cell wall and CM with one dome per cell. J-L, P. burchellii. Bolus 687 , Bredenkamp 1545 ; J, CM with several domes per cell;
K, randomly arranged cells, transversely oblong with rounded angles, several domes per cell; L, t/s epidermis in polarised light showing
CM with several domes per cell. Abbreviations: CM, cuticular membrane; cw, outer periclinal cell wall; d, dome; me, molar-like crown;
og, osmiophilic granules; oz, amorphous outside zone; pe, cuticular peg; rz, narrow faintly reticulate inner zone; t, trichome. Scale bars:
A, 5 pm; C, F, I, 10 pm; B, D, E, G, H, J-L, 100 pm.
80
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
81
ited taxonomic value at species level, except in Passerina
sp. nov. 1, which has stomatal crypts or sunken stomata.
Classification of the stomatal complex into stomatal types
is often a problem owing to the subtle distinction of sub-
sidiary cells (Wilkinson 1979; Van Wyk et al. 1982).
Patel (1978) considers subsidiary cells as morphologi-
cally and physiologically different from other epidermal
cells and proposes a number of criteria to distinguish
subsidiary cells in mature epidermis. Of these criteria we
used the following in the distinction of subsidiary cells:
size, shape, contents and position of cells. We found that
the cells adjacent to the guard cells did not differ from
other epidermal cells, except that they might be raised or
sunken (Figures 2K; 3C). Furthermore, when stained
with PAS, periclinal walls of subsidiary cells should be
lightly stained compared with other epidermal cells,
owing to less carbohydrates in these cell walls according
to Patel (1978). In Passerina the periclinal walls of the
cells adjacent to the guard cells stained homogenously
with other cells in the stomatal complex (Figure 2F) and
the anticlinal walls are not comparatively thinner than
those of other epidermal cells, thus the cells adjacent to
the guard cells cannot be considered subsidiary cells
(Figure 2F, H). Stained with Sudan Black B, the contents
of the cells surrounding the guard cells do not differ from
those of other epidermal cells and no lipid bodies are pre-
sent (Figure 2G).
We therefore conclude that the epidermal cells sur-
rounding the guard cells in Passerina are not differentia-
ted as subsidiary cells and we classify the stomatal appa-
ratus in Passerina as anomocytic. This corresponds to the
prevailing state in the Thymelaeaceae (Solereder 1908;
Metcalfe & Chalk 1979). However, although we prefer to
regard the epidermal cells surrounding the guard cells as
similar to other epidermal cells, the presence of conspic-
uous peristomatal cuticular rims on the outer periclinal
cell walls of epidermal cells around the guard cells may
be used in support of a view that these cells are subsidiary
cells. The stomatal apparatus could then be classified as
staurocytic (Wilkinson 1979) or anomotetracytic (Dilcher
1974). As the number of epidermal cells surrounding the
guard cells varies from 3-5(6), it would seem appropriate
to classify the stomatal apparatus as anomostaurocytic
(Van Wyk et al. 1982).
Trichomes
Passerina leaves are often cymbiform with spiralised
trichomes densely arranged in the concave ventral
space. This indumentum is likely to play an important
role in the water relations of the plant. Water droplets
precipitating from the atmosphere, or running down
from leaves directly above, would accumulate in the
concave leaf space. Droplets would be repelled by the
hydrophobic cuticle of the trichomes and owing to cohe-
sion forces cause a moisture layer in the upper part of
the dense trichomes. One may speculate that water
vapour escaping through the stomata would not be
drawn outwards by capillary forces because of the
water-repelling nature of the cuticle surrounding the tri-
chomes, thus retaining a high concentration of moisture
in the vicinty of the stomata. The overall high concen-
tration of water vapour over the adaxial surface of the
leaf is likely to decrease the transpiration rate.
Laboratory tests to assess the wettability and the possi-
ble absorption of water by the laminar epidermal hairs in
Passerina, suggest that the wettability of the spiralised
hairs is quite low and that absorption of water by these
trichomes is highly improbable. However, our sugges-
tion of an overall high concentration of water in the
adaxial cavity of the leaf, which serves to decrease the
transpiration rate, is supported by these tests.
Cuticular ornamentation
Cuticular thickness may be affected by light, temper-
ature, soil, atmospheric moisture and altitude (Wilkinson
1979). In Passerina, with many species adapted to the
Cape Mediterranean climate, all members have a rela-
tively thick cuticle, but it was the thickest in P. comosa,
P. glomerata, P. burchellii, P. galpinii and P. paleacea
(Table 2). The first two species grow in the northwestern
parts of the Western Cape and on the mountains in and
around the Little Karoo (= Karoo Mountain Centre sensu
Weimarck 1941), areas with high light intensity, high
temperature and low atmospheric moisture. P. burchellii,
growing on high mountains at Villiersdorp and
Genadendal, is exposed to high light intensity as well as
high and low critical temperatures. P. galpinii grows on
calcrete and P. paleacea is exposed to salt spray and
wind. In P. drakensbergensis, P. falcifolia, P. paludosa
and P. sp. nov. 1, the thickness of the CM is ± 20 pm. Of
these species, P. falcifolia, from the mountains between
George and Uitenhage, and P. drakensbergensis, from
high altitudes in the Bergville District of KwaZulu-
Natal, are exposed to relatively high atmospheric mois-
ture. However, it is difficult to speculate on the function-
al significance of the relatively thin cuticles in P. palu-
dosa, from salt marshes in the Cape Peninsula, and P. sp.
nov. 1, a species from Waboomberg, one of the highest
points in the Western Cape and often covered by snow in
winter.
FIGURE 5.— Abaxial leaf epidermis and structure of CM in Passerina. Epidermal macerations stained with safranin and t/s of epidermis stained
with Sudan Black B. A-C, P. drakensbergensis, Bredenkamp 1018, 1019'. A, cells arranged in rows with 9 or 10 globular papillae per cell;
B, inner surface facing upwards, cells oblong in shape with 9 or 10 papillae per cell; C, CM layered, with cuticular layer and cuticle prop-
er, also globular papillae. D-F, Passerina sp. nov. 1, Bredenkamp 1044, 1046: D, several domes per cell, CM irregularly marked by ice
crystals; E, cells arranged in rows, oblong in shape with CM irregularly marked by ice crystals; F, geometrical plates, flat or slightly raised.
G-I, P. rigida, Bredenkamp 1013, Ward 7211: G, cells arranged in rows, plates abundant; H, cells arranged in rows, isodiametric to slight-
ly oblong; I, CM pronounced at junctions of epidermal cell walls, grooved in midline of joining walls, concavities and convexities not con-
spicuous. J-L, P. paludosa, Bredenkamp 1035, Thoday 100: J, cells arranged in rows, CM pronounced at junctions of epidermal cell walls,
grooved in midline of joining walls, concavities and convexities conspicuous; K, cells arranged in rows, cells oblong; L, CM pronounced
at junctions of epidermal cell walls, grooved in midline of joining walls. Abbreviations: cl, cuticular layer; co, concavity; cp, cuticle prop-
er; cw, outer periclinal cell wall; cx, convexity; gr, groove in CM; pa, papillae; pe, cuticular peg; pi, plates. Scale bars: A, D, E, G, H, J-L,
100 pm; B, C, F, I, 10 pm.
82
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 6. — SEM micrographs of abaxial leaf surfaces, the CM and epicuticular waxes in Passerina. A, B, P. comosa, MacDonald 2125: A,
droplets present in epicuticular wax, platelets flaking from smooth wax coating; B, wax platelets flaking from smooth wax coating, plates
present C, P. glomerata, Bredenkamp 973 , outer periclinal wall convex, plates scarce, square to oblong, raised 30°-90°; D, P. ericoides ,
Bredcnkamp 956, droplets present in epicuticular wax; E, P. obtusifolia , Bredenkamp 929 , smooth wax coating also covering domes. F, G,
P burchellii, Stokoe 2542: F, droplets at apices of domes; G, small round protrusions at apices of papillae. H, P. filiformis, Bredenkamp
K)16, upright plates separate from surrounding wax, orientated at an angle to cell rows; I, P. pendula , Bredenkamp 908 , plates frequent,
perpendicular to cell rows, square to oblong, flat or raised; J, P. rigida, Bredenkamp 1013 , platelets and plates ; K, L, P. paleacea,
Bredenkamp 961 , wax droplets, protrusions and flat shapeless lumps contributing towards soft wax coating or smooth layer. Abbreviations:
dr, droplets in epicuticular wax; pi, plates; pr, small round protrusions of epicuticular wax; ps, platelets. Scale bars: A-K, 10 pm; L, 1 pm.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
83
FIGURE 7. — SEM micrographs of abaxial leaf surfaces of Passerina washed in chloroform for one minute, compared to unwashed specimens.
A-E, P. paleacea, Bredenkamp 96P. A, unwashed leaf showing droplets in smooth wax coating; B, low magnification of washed leaf,
showing CM devoid of epicuticular wax; C-E, higher magnifications showing pores in CM. F, P. ericoides, Bredenkamp 956, washed
specimen showing pores in CM. G-I, P. obtusifolia, Bredenkamp 929: G, unwashed specimen; H, I, washed specimens showing corroded
apices of papillae. Abbreviations: dr, droplets in epicuticular wax; p, pore; pa, papillae. Scale bars: A, C-F, I, 1 pm; B, G, H, 100 pm.
Haberlandt (1914), following a study of plants in tropical
rain forests, considered the function of papillose epidermal
cells as concentrating limited light by acting as lenses.
Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (1999) speculate that, in
Passerina, the convex outer periclinal epidermal cell
wall may well focus light rays onto the mesophyll,
whereas large vacuoles filled with phenols and the
mucilage formed by the cellulose slimes (inner periclinal
walls) protect the mesophyll from potentially dangerous
UV-B radiation. According to Wilkinson (1979) the pres-
ence and prominence of papillae are diagnostically unre-
liable because they vary with the climate or distribution
of the species; only morphologically distinct types can be
used for diagnostic purposes. However, distinct epider-
mal cell papillae characterise P. comosa, P. obtusifolia
P. burchellii, P. drakensbergensis and P. sp. nov. 2
(Figures 4B-C, G-L; 5A-C). The presence of these
papillae could have been induced by the high light inten-
sity of the areas in which these plants grow.
Epicuticular waxes
In their study of the epicuticular waxes in the families
of the Dilleniidae and Rosidae, Ditsch & Barthlott
(1997) documented the numbers of genera, species and
hybrids in which different wax types occur, without iden-
tifying the various taxa. The epicuticular waxes of 12
genera, 31 species and two hybrids were studied in the
Thymelaeaceae. Of these, nine genera and 26 species
have wax flakes, one species has angled platelets and
four genera and five species have no crystalloids. Our
84
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
observations indicate that the simple plate-type waxes
found in Passerina correspond well to those described by
Ditsch & Barthlott (1997) in the Thymelaeaceae. Of the
17 species in Passerina , two have wax flakes, eight have
platelets or angled plates and seven are devoid of crys-
talloids (Figure 6, Table 3).
The mechanism of wax extrusion through the cuticle is
highly controversial (Baker 1974; Jeffree et al. 1975;
Hallam 1982). Baker (1982) discusses the extrusion of
wax by means of ‘pores and channels, the liquid extrusion
theory, polymerization theory and the crystallization the-
ory’. Hallam (1982) proposes that wax or wax precursors
in their protein or glycoprotein ‘shells’ move through the
cuticle and burst on the surface, liberating the wax from
the ‘package’; on crystallization, the protein coats stick to
the surface as the wax crystals develop.
Our results indicate small pores in the cleaned, de-
waxed cuticle of P. paleacea and P. ericoides (Figure
7B-F), after washing leaves in chloroform. Both Baker
(1982) and Hallam (1982) are convinced that detailed
investigations by many investigators have failed to con-
firm the presence of pores or microchannels in certain
plant cuticles and that pores have not been shown to con-
nect with the plasmalemma of the epidermal cytoplasm
below. Although the presence of pores has been con-
firmed by our study, further research on the ultrastructure
of the CM in Passerina could be most informative.
Freeman et al. (1979), working on Citrus, found
amorphous wax layers on immature leaves and fruit,
with small protrusions and isolated regions of upright
platelets developing, eventually followed by cracks and
irregular plates. Similarly in Passerina, wax droplets,
protrusions and flat, shapeless lumps contribute towards
a soft wax coating or a smooth layer. Species of Pas-
serina with soft wax coatings, without platelets or plates,
are summarised in Table 3. In P. comosa, P. filiformis
and P. rigida (Figure 6B, H, J) platelets and plates are
formed as a result of cracks developing on the outer wax
surface, crystallising into irregularly shaped flakes,
which gradually become square or oblong with ‘entire’
or ‘non-entire’ margins, often becoming distinctly edged.
In P. filiformis (Figure 6H) upright plates separate from
the surrounding wax, orientating themselves at an angle
to the cell rows, eventually resulting in most plates being
arranged more or less perpendicularly to the cell rows.
Wax type, as well as the presence or absence of plates
and platelets, is apparently genetically determined
(Baker 1982). For example, P. ericoides, P. rigida and P.
paleacea (Figure 6D, J, K) all grow along the sea shore,
where they are subjected to wind, salt spray and high
light intensity, and yet, P. ericoides and P. paleacea have
coverings of soft waxes only, whereas platelets and
plates are abundantly present in P. rigida. However, in
plate waxes the number of platelets and plates, size, con-
figuration and distribution of the surface wax structures
can be considered as environmentally induced (Baker
1974, 1982).
Functions of epicuticular waxes
Possible functions of epicuticular waxes are discussed
by Jeffree (1986). In Passerina, large areas of the abaxi-
al epidermis are exposed to the atmosphere because the
inverse-ericoid leaves are usually closely appressed to
the stem. In response to the warm, dry summers of the
Mediterranean climate of the Cape, it is proposed that the
CM, including the abaxial epicuticular waxes, has a
water-proofing function, protecting the leaves against
desiccation and limiting transpiration to the adaxial epi-
dermis only. As the leaves are decussately arranged, the
water-repelling function of the waxes would cause
droplets of water to run off the abaxial epidermis, into
the concave, hairy adaxial surface of the lower leaf,
resulting in a decreased transpiration rate owing to the
higher adaxial water concentration. According to Jeffree
(1986) the wettability of the plant surface is determined
by its microroughness. The presence of crystalloid
platelets and plates, and especially their arrangement
perpendicular to cell rows, may facilitate the retention of
moisture.
Systematic value
Epicuticular waxes have been proven taxonomically
valuable, among others in the study of the Centro-
spermae (Engel & Barthlott 1988), Dilleniidae and
Rosidae, including the Thymelaeaceae (Ditsch &
Barthlott 1997), at sectional level in Eucalyptus L’Her.
(Hallam & Chambers 1970) and at species level in
Hordeum L. (Baum et al. 1989). In Passerina the pres-
ence or absence of crystalloid platelets or plates com-
bined with characteristics of the CM and the outer peri-
clinal cell walls of the abaxial epidermis, makes it possi-
ble to distinguish between two groups in the genus. This
distinction is species-specific for most of the 17 species
examined (Table 3).
Ecological aspects of leaf epidermis
The structure and function of the epidermis should be
considered in context with gross leaf morphology and
arrangement. Leaf arrangement is of vital importance to
the physiology of the plant. The epidermis serves as an
envelope, physically protecting the mesophyll, the
largest part of the abaxial epidermis forming a multi-
functional barrier to the environment. The thin adaxial
epidermis is concealed in the groove of the cymbiform
leaf in most cases; it is almost covered by dense, long,
spiralised uniserial trichomes and contains the stomata,
which are often raised. This arrangement is likely to
reduce the rate of transpiration, especially if moisture
can be retained by the indumentum. The abaxial epider-
mis is probably multifunctional. The whole of the CM
has a waterproofing function and the epicuticular waxes
also have a water-repelling function. At the same time
the CM may play a major part in focusing light rays onto
the palisade parenchyma. Large tanniniferous vacuoles
may play a role in the possible absorption of UV-B radia-
tion, and mucilage formed by the cellulose slimes (inner
periclinal walls) possibly protects the mesophyll from
desiccation (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999).
The expansion and inrolling of the leaf margins in
Passerina, as a result of changing turgor pressure in the
epidermal cells, were described by Thoday (1921). He
regards the main mechanism involved as the co-ordina-
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
85
tion between the turgor pressure and the difference in
size and thickness of cell walls of the ad- and abaxial epi-
dermis, whereas the plicate anticlinal cell walls of the
abaxial epidermis protect the cells against bending stress.
Stomata (or at least the indumentum) are exposed when
the leaf margins expand and are protected in a villous
groove when the leaf margins are rolled inwards, thus
regulating the rate of transpiration.
CONCLUSIONS
Leaf shape and structure in Thymelaeaceae exhibit a
transformation series from mainly dorsiventral, the pre-
vailing family feature, to isobilateral or centric in
Diarthron Turcz., Pimelea Banks & Soland. and Thyme-
laea Juss. (Metcalfe & Chalk 1950). All the mentioned
states are present in Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Beyers
1992) and, as the most advanced state, inversely dor-
siventral leaves in Passerina. A transformation series can
also be illustrated by the presence of amphistomatic,
hypostomatic and epistomatic leaves in the Thyme-
laeaceae (Metcalfe & Chalk 1950), the epistomatic state
in Passerina considered to be the most advanced (the
collateral vascular bundles of the leaves, with xylem
arranged adaxially and phloem abaxially, rule out the
possibility of resupination of the leaves).
The most pronounced epidermal characters of the
Thymelaeaceae are anomocytic stomata (Metcalfe &
Chalk 1950), unicellular trichomes and mucilagination
of epidermal cells. In the present study the presence or
absence, distribution of or changes in the above-men-
tioned structures, were used as distinguishing characters
at both generic and species levels. Mucilagination of epi-
dermal cells is often found both ad- and abaxially in the
leaves of Thymelaeaceae. In Passerina, mucilagination
takes place in the abaxial epidermis only. At species level
the sunken stomata and stomatal crypts of Passerina sp.
nov. 1 are used in the delineation of the new taxon and
P. comosa is distinguished by the presence of unicellular
trichomes on the abaxial surface of the leaves.
On the basis of abaxial cuticular characters, it has
been possible to distinguish two groups of species in the
genus. Group A comprises P. burchellii Thoday, P.
comosa C.H. Wright, P. ericoides L., P. glomerata
Thunb. and P. obtusifolia Thoday. Group B comprises P.
drakensbergensis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, P. falcifolia
C.H. Wright. P.filiformis L., P. galpinii C.H. Wright, P.
montana Thoday, P. paleacea Wikstr., P. paludosa
Thoday, P. pendula Eckl. & Zeyh., P. rigida Wikstr., P.
rubra C.H.Wright, P. vulgaris Thoday, P. sp. nov. 1, P.
sp. nov. 2, P. sp. nov. 3 and P. sp. nov. 4. Certain species
in each of the two groups seem to be naturally allied.
Distribution patterns of P. obtusifolia and P. glomerata
coincide at Worcester and transitional types can be clear-
ly distinguished. Transitional types are similarly present
in P.fdiformis and P. vulgaris in the Cape Peninsula and
in P.fdiformis and P. falcifolia near Knysna.
Hence it can be concluded that the conspicuous dif-
ferences as well as the concise characters of the ad- and
abaxial epidermis, critically described and discussed in
this paper, can be used as taxonomic tools at the family,
genus and species levels. Furthermore, the leaf epidermis
in Passerina is probably most valuable to the plant in
terms of ecological adaptation, considering the wide dis-
tribution of the genus in southern Africa as well as the
accompanying geographical and climatic variation. The
gross leaf morphology and the ad- and abaxial epidermal
characters have been most useful in the interpretation of
the possible functioning of the leaves and are of vital
importance in the survival strategies of the plant.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Mmes H. du Plessis and C.
Steyn and Dr E. Steyn for assistance with the LM, Mrs
A. Romanowski for developing and printing many excel-
lent photographs and Prof. J. Coetzee and Mr C. van der
Merwe, both of the University of Pretoria, for assistance
with the SEM and TEM.
REFERENCES
ALVIN, K.L. 1987. Leaf anatomy of Androstachys johnsonii Prain and
its functional significance. Annals of Botany 59: 579-591.
AMELUNXEN. F„ MORGENROTH. K. & PICKSAK, T. 1967. Unter-
suchungen an der Epidermis mit dem Stereoscan-Elektronen-
mikroskop. Zeitschrift fiir Pflanzenphysiologie 57: 79-95.
BAKER, E.A. 1974. The influence of environment on leaf wax devel-
opment in Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera. New Phytologist
73: 955-966.
BAKER, E.A. 1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular
waxes. In D.F. Cutler, K.L. Alvin & C.E. Price, The plant cuti-
cle: 139-165. Academic Press, London.
BARTHLOTT, W„ NEINHUIS, C„ CUTLER, D„ DITSCH, F„ MEU-
SEL, I., THEISEN, 1. & WILHELMI, H. 1998. Classification
and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society 126: 237-260.
BAUM, B R., TULLOCH, A.P. & BAILEY, G.L. 1989. Epicuticular
waxes of the genus Hordeum: a survey of their chemical com-
position and ultrastructure. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:
3219-3226.
BEAUMONT, A.J., EDWARDS, T.J. & VAN STADEN, J. 1994. Leaf
and involucral bract characters of systematic use in Gnidia
(Thymelaeaceae). Proceedings of the Electron Microscopy Society
of South A frica 24: 47.
BEYERS, J.B.P. 1992. The generic delimitation of Lachnaea and
Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). M.Sc. thesis, University of Stellen-
bosch, Stellenbosch.
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora: a de-
scriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany 13: 1-455.
BREDENKAMP, C L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1999. Structure of mucila-
ginous epidermal cell walls in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae).
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 129: 223-238.
DILCHER, D.L. 1974. Approaches to the identificaton of angiosperm
leaf remains. Botanical Review 40: 1-157.
DITSCH, F. & BARTHLOTT, W. 1997. Mikromorphologie der Epi-
cuticularwachse und das System der Dileniidae und Rosidae.
Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz.
ENGEL, T.E. & BARTHLOTT, W. 1988. Micromorphology of epicu-
ticular waxes in Centrosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution
161: 71-85.
FEDER, N. & O’BRIEN, TP 1968. Plant microtechnique: some prin-
ciples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55: 1 23—
142.
FREEMAN, B„ ALBRIGO, L.G. & BIGGS, R.H. 1979. Ultrastructure
and chemistry of cuticular waxes of developing Citrus leaves
and fruits. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural
Science 104: 801-808.
GILG, E. 1894. Studien iiber die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der
Thymelaeales und iiber die ‘anatomische Methode’. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 18: 489-574.
GOLDBLATT, P & MANNING, J.C. in press. Cape plants: conspec-
tus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia.
86
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
HABERLANDT, G. 1914. Physiological plant anatomy. Reprint edn
1965. Today & Tomorrow’s Book Agency, New Delhi.
HALLAM, N.D. 1982. Fine structure of the leaf cuticle and the origin
of leaf waxes. In D.F. Cutler, K.L. Alvin & C.E. Price, The plant
cuticle: 197-214. Academic Press, London.
HALLAM, N.D. & CHAMBERS, T.C. 1970. The leaf waxes of the
genus Eucalyptus L’Heritier. Australian Journal of Botany 18:
335-386.
HOLLOWAY, P.J. 1982. Structure and histochemistry of plant cuticu-
lar membranes: an overview. In D.F. Cutler, K.L. Alvin & C.E.
Price, The plant cuticle : 1-32. Academic Press, London.
JEFFREE, C.E. 1986. The cuticle, epicuticular waxes and trichomes of
plants, with reference to their structure, functions and evolu-
tion. In B. Juniper & R. Southwood, Insects and the plant sur-
face: 23-64. Edward Arnold, London.
JEFFREE, C.E., BAKER, E.A. & HOLLOWAY, P.J. 1975. Ultra-
structure and recrystallization of plant epicuticular waxes. New
Phytologist 75: 539-549.
KARNOVSKY, M.J. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of
high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell
Biology 27: 137a.
KIGER, R.W. 1971. Epidermal and cuticular mounts of plant material
obtained by maceration. Stain Technology 46: 71-75.
KUGLER, H. 1928. fiber inverse-dorsiventrale Blatter. Planta 5: 89-
134.
MARTIN, J.T. & JUNIPER, B.E. 1970. The cuticles of plants. Edward
Arnold, London.
METCALFE, C.R. & CHALK, L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons
2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
METCALFE, C.R. & CHALK, L. 1979. Anatomy of the dicotyledons
1, edn 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
PATEL, J.D. 1978. How should we interpret and distinguish subsidiary
cells? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 65-72.
REYNOLDS, E.S. 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-
opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology
17:208-212.
SOLEREDER, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons 2.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
STACE, C.A. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. The
Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany, ser.
4: 1-78.
SUPPRIAN, K. 1894. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Thymelaeaceae und
Penaeaceae. Botanische Jahrbiicher 18: 306-353.
THEOBALD, W.L., KRAHULIK, J.L. & ROLLINS, R.C. 1979.
Trichome description and classification. In C.R. Metcalfe & L.
Chalk, Anatomy of the dicotyledons 1 : 40-53.
THODAY, D. 1921. On the behaviour during drought of leaves of two
Cape species of Passerina , with some notes on their anatomy.
Annals of Botany 35: 585-601.
THODAY, D. 1924. XVIII. A revision of Passerina. Kew Bulletin 4:
146-168.
VAN DER MERWE, C.F. & COETZEE, J. 1992. Quetol 651 for gen-
eral use: a revised formulation. Proceedings of the Electron
Microscopy Society of Southern Africa 22: 31, 32.
VAN TIEGHEM, PH. 1893. Recherches sur la structure et les affinites
des Thymeleacees et des Peneacees. Annates des Sciences
Naturelles Botanique. 7,17: 185-294.
VAN WYK, A.E., ROBBERTSE, P.J. & KOK, PDF. 1982. The genus
Eugenia L. (Myrtaceae) in southern Africa: the structure and
taxonomic value of stomata. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 84: 41-56.
WEIMARCK, H. 1941. Phyto geo graphical groups, centres and inter-
vals within the Cape Flora. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F.
Avd. 2, Bd. 37, Nr. 5. Otto Harrassowitz, Leipzig.
WILKINSON, H.P. 1979. The plant surface. In C.R. Metcalfe & L.
Chalk, Anatomy of the dicotyledons, edn 2, 1: 97-165. Claren-
don Press, Oxford.
Bothalia 30,1: 87-96(2000)
Vegetation of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands south of George,
South Africa
D.B. HOARE*f, J.E. VICTOR**, R.A. LUBKE* and L. MUCINA*
Keywords: gradient analysis, numerical syntaxonomy, ordination, phytogeography, phytosociology
ABSTRACT
Community structure and composition of the coastal fynbos and rocky headland plant communities south of George,
southern Cape, were studied. Vegetation was analysed using standard sampling procedures of the floristic-sociological
approach of Braun-Blanquet. The releve data were subject to TWINSPAN-based divisive classification, and ordinated by
Principal Coordinates Analysis with the aim to identify vegetation coenocline subsequently interpreted in terms of under-
lying environmental gradients. Most of the sampled vegetation was classified as coastal fynbos. The Leucadendron
salignum-Tetraria cuspidata Fynbos Community was found to occupy sheltered habitats, whereas the Relhania calyci-
na-Passerina vulgaris Fynbos Community was found in exposed habitats. The other two communities characterise strong-
ly exposed rocky headlands. The Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus-Ruschia tenella Community is wind-sheared scrub, and the
Gazania rigens- Limonium scabrum Rocky Headland Community is a loose-canopy, low-grown herbland, characterised by
the occurrence of partly salt-tolerant and succulent herbs. The ordination of the fynbos communities revealed a horseshoe
structure allowing a direct recognition of a coenocline spanning two fynbos communities along the Axis 1 interpreted in
terms of exposure to wind and salt spray. A considerable amount of alien plant infestation was also present. This appears to
be the largest threat to the continued existence of this coastal fynbos.
INTRODUCTION
Fynbos occurring in close vicinity of the coast has been
studied in detail in many regions of South Africa (Boucher
1977; Van der Merwe 1979; Cowling 1984; Taylor 1985;
Hellstrom 1990; Taylor & Boucher 1993; Hoare 1994).
There are, however, still many portions of the coastline,
especially outside formal reserves, which remain only
poorly known. Only 79 km of the central south coast falls
into existing protected areas, namely the Goukamma
Nature Reserve, the Robberg Nature Reserve and the
Tsitsikamma Coastal National Park (Jarman 1986). The
promulgation of the Agulhas National Park may alter these
statistics (World Wide Fund for Nature 1999).
The area along the coast south of George, the present
study area, is of interest because of its scenic beauty and its
location in the centre of the popular Garden Route. Interest
in coastal development for recreational purposes through-
out the Garden Route is likely to impact on areas which
have not yet been encroached upon. The extent of vegeta-
tion cover outside formally protected areas has been con-
siderably transformed, and of the remaining natural areas
large portions have been invaded by alien species. It was
therefore suggested by Cape Nature Conservation (George)
that a detailed study be undertaken along the coast south of
George to provide information on the local vegetation and
flora and possible importance of the study area for conser-
vation (G. Hellstrom pers. comm.). This particular study
features descriptions of the plant communities of habitats
close to the coastline.
* Department of Botany, Rhodes University, 6140 Grahamstown,
South Africa.
t Present address: Agricultural Research Council, Range & Forage
Institute, Private Bag X05, 0039 Lynn East, Pretoria.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
+ Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag XI,
7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa.
MS. received: 1998-07-24.
STUDY AREA
The study area extended from Rooiklip, SE of
Pacaltsdorp, to Ghwanobaai, 3 km E of Glentana (Figure
1), and covered ± 190 hectares. Glentana, and the area west
of it, has been extensively developed and was therefore
found unsuitable for the intended study. The fynbos vegeta-
tion in the study area has been classified as Asteraceous
Fynbos by Cowling & Holmes (1992) and it was broadly
classified by Acocks (1988) as ‘cultivated land, plantations,
dense alien communities and open sandy areas’, a descrip-
tion which gives a clear indication of the transformed state
of the vegetation. The vegetation of the coastline area is
classified as Dune Thicket (Low & Rebelo 1996), which
forms a mosaic with Dune Fynbos (Low & Rebelo 1996)
in the region including the study area.
The coastline consists of steep coastal cliffs ranging in
height from 50 to 70 metres, forming rocky headlands.
The plenitude of alternating bays and headlands has
resulted in microhabitats with varying degrees of expo-
sure to the prevailing winds, salt spray and sun. Coastal
soils vary markedly according to substrate, but are often
calcareous and coarse-grained. Topography is the domi-
nant factor affecting soil formation and the removal of
the products of weathering may exceed their formation,
especially on slopes. The coastal cliffs of the study area
are Rooiklip Granite-Gneiss of the Kaaimans Group and
are pre-Cape intrusive granite rocks (South African
Committee for Stratigraphy 1980). These rocks are
important because, upon weathering, they form base-rich
substrates containing exchangeable cations that are
important for soil formation and plant nutrient cycling
(Deacon et al. 1992).
The Koppen’s climate classification code for the
George coastal area is Cfb, which indicates warm, tem-
perate climate (Schulze & McGee 1978). The mean annu-
al temperature is ± 17°C, with a mean temperature range
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 1. — Map of the study area and climate diagram for George.
of 8°C near the coast. The area has precipitation during all
months of the year, with three prominent peaks in spring,
summer and autumn, although there is no precipitation
deficit at any time of the year (Figure 1 ). Sea mists may
provide additional moisture on seaward-facing slopes.
Pronounced strong winds blow along the entire coastal
belt, varying in direction according to location and season.
In the study area, wind from the southwest and west were
found to be more important, since their frequency was
higher (Weather Bureau 1994). Wind velocity has been
found to be important in coastal plant communities, since
the greater the velocity of the wind, the higher the salt load
of the moving air, which may have a serious detrimental
effect on the growth of plants (Avis & Lubke 1985).
Importance values (Table 1) were determined which took
into account the velocity and frequency of winds from dif-
ferent directions (IV = mean monthly direction frequency
multiplied by mean monthly velocity expressed as per-
centage of total of all values for year). Westerly winds had
the highest importance values throughout the year but
were of greatest importance during the winter months.
Southwesterlies showed a similar pattern. Easterlies and
southeasterlies had the second highest importance values,
but these were most prevalent during spring and summer
(September to March).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Aerial photographs were used to stratify the region
into broad vegetation complexes based on vegetation
structure and releves (25 m2 each) were made within
these zones. The quadrat size was determined from
species/area curves drawn from data collected in the
study area, but also conformed to a scale-related
approach to vegetation sampling, i.e. the size of the
releve was related to the scale at which the vegetation
was studied (Rutherford & Westfall 1994). Riparian
thicket, dune thicket, dense alien stands and agricultural
lands were not sampled. Standard field techniques and
the 7-grade sampling scale of Braun-Blanquet (Westhoff
& Van der Maarel 1973; Werger 1974) were used to
record the cover/abundance values for each vascular
species encountered in the releves. Topographic informa-
tion, including slope, aspect and altitude were also
TABLE 1. — Importance values of winds from different directions in
the months of the year. Bold text shows cells with importance
values greater than 1. (IV’s calculated from data from Weather
Bureau. See text for method)
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
89
recorded. Physical soil properties, such as pH, conduc-
tivity, organic matter content, water-holding capacity, as
well as the relative fraction of coarse, medium and fine
sand, silt and clay, were ascertained in a subset of 20
releves. The general methodology used by the US
Department of Agriculture (USDA 1972) was followed
for analysing soils.
The vegetation data were initially classified using
TWINSPAN (Hill 1979), producing a rough species-by-
releve matrix, which was further rearranged in order to
finely tune the releve/species coincidence patterns sup-
posed to carry meaningful ecological information. The
data from only the fynbos communities were subject to
ordination by Principal Coordinates Analysis based on
similarity ratio as resemblance measure with no a priori
data transformation using the programme package SYN-
TAX-5 (Podani 1993, 1994).
For the descriptions of vegetation communities, three
informal ranks of vegetation units are recognised: com-
munity, subcommunity, and facies. Facies (Braun-
Blanquet 1964) represents the lowest-ranked unit and
corresponds to vegetation stands dominated by a single
species, mostly an alien element.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Classification of plant communities
The rearranged species-quadrat matrix (Table 2)
revealed two groups of plant communities: the majority
of the releves were classified as coastal fynbos (Com-
munities A & B) and the remainder of the releves as
(non-fynbos) rocky headland communities (Communities
C & D). A summary of the community environmental and
floristic relationships is given in Figure 2. The following
communities, subcommunities and facies were identified:
A. Leucadendron salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fyn-
bos Community
This community occurs in areas that are protected
from coastal winds either by headlands or the proximity
of coastal thicket (Figure 3) and has a different species
composition to the fynbos on the exposed summit of the
coastal cliffs. Diagnostic species: Leucadendron salig-
num, Aspalathus asparagoides, Hermannia angularis ,
Metalasia acuta , Helichrysum cymosum and Bobartia
aphylla. Dominant species: Syncarpha paniculata and
Passerina vulgaris. Common species: Tetraria cuspidata,
Cliffortia falcata, Metalasia pungens, Lobelia tomen-
tosa. Erica discolor and Phylica confusa. Many stands of
this community have been seriously invaded by the alien
species Acacia cyclops, Leptospermum laevigatum and
Pinus spp.
Slopes vary from moderate to steep and soils are gen-
erally deeper and finer-grained than on cliff summits.
There is high species richness (19 species on average) in
this community. The habitat is more variable than on the
cliff summits, thus leading to a greater species turnover
between localities. The geographic distribution of this
community beyond the present study area is unknown.
Four subcommunities are recognised and described.
Aa. Thamnochortus cinereus Subcommunity
Diagnostic species: Thamnochortus cinereus,
Polygala microlopha and Cliffortia sp. ( Victor 313). It is
situated below a housing development at Herold’s Bay
Extension; there was no evidence of recent fire and the
subcommunity is possibly one form of a fire-climax veg-
etation in protected areas.
Ab. Protea neriifolia Subcommunity
Diagnostic species: Protea neriifolia. It has developed
in the absence of fire and is possibly a fire-climax vege-
tation of protected areas. Bobartia aphylla and Pelar-
gonium fruticosum serve as common linking species to
subcommunites Aa and Ab.
Ac. Typical Subcommunity
Lacks the diagnostic species of the other three sub-
communities, but contains the diagnostic species of the
Leucadendron salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos
Community. There was evidence of recent fires in a num-
ber of the releves.
Ad. Hermannia althaeifolia Subcommunity
Diagnostic species: Hermannia althaeifolia, Hibiscus
aethiopicus, Ficinia albicans and Ursinia saxatilis as
well as a number of infrequently occurring species
(Table 2). Most of the releves had evidence of being
burnt recently, suggesting that it is an early post-fire suc-
cessional stage.
The vegetation height varies from 1 m, where dwarf
shrubs are dominant, to over 2.5 m where shrubs of the
exotic Leptospermum laevigatum are found. The mean
species richness of this subcommunity is 20 species on
average, but this may be reduced to only eight species
where invasion by exotic shrubs has taken place, as is the
case of the Acacia meamsii facies (Table 2, rel. 23).
B. Relhania calycina-Phylica confusa Fynbos Commu-
nity
This community makes up the greatest proportion of
the fynbos in the study area and also extends beyond the
boundaries of the present study area along the summit of
the coastal cliffs towards Knysna (Figure 3). Diagnostic
species: Relhania calycina subsp. calycina and Viscum
capensis. Dominant species: Erica discolor, Phylica con-
fusa, Passerina vulgaris and Tetraria cuspidata. Common
species: Thesium virgatum, Agathosma ovata, Erica pelta-
ta, Syncarpha paniculata and Cliffortia serpyllifolia.
The dwarf shrub layer of this community is usually
about 1 m in height and the herb layer about 0.4 m. The
total cover of the vegetation is slightly lower than for
90
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 2. — Classification of the vegetation of the coastal cliff habitats south of George, South Africa
Key to communities and subcommunities:
A: Leucadendron salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos Community
Aa: Thamnochortus cinereus Subcommunity
Ab: Protea neriifolia Subcommunity
Ac: Typical Subcommunity
Ad: Hermarmia althaeifolia Subcommunity
F: Acacia mearnsii facies
B: Relhania calycina-Phylica confusa Fynbos Community
Ba: Tetraria cuspidata Subcommunity
Bb: Eriocephalus africanus Subcommunity
C: Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus-Ruschia tenella Coastal Scrub Community
S: Sporobolus virginicus facies
D: Gazania rigens-Limonium scabrum Rocky Headland Community
G: Gazania rigens facies
Legend to vegetation layers: hi, herb layer; jl, juvenile woody species; si, upper shrub layer; s2, low shrub layer; t3, low tree layer. Taxonomic
notes, Gazania rigens = Gazania rigens var. uniflora\ Limonium scabrum agg. is a new taxon pending formal description (L. Mucina, in prep.) and
is closely related to L. scabrum (Thunb.) Kuntze; Drosanthemum marinum agg. is a complex of D. marinum and D. delicatulum and might repre-
sent one taxon after a revision (P. Burgoyne pers. comm ).
Coastal Fynbos
Tetraria cuspidata
Thesium virgatum
Syncarpha paniculata
Erica formosa
Cliffortia falcata
Metalasia pungens
Erica pel tat a
Schizaea pectinata
Restio triticeus
Lobelia tomentosa
Centella virgata
Pentaschistis eriostoma
Ficinia nigrescens
Carissa edulis
Aspalathus alopecurus
Anthospermum prostratum
Cullumia bisulca
Aspalathus florifera
Falkia repens
Crassula subulata
Disparago kraussii
Erica ericoides
Rhus lucida
Hahlenbergia desman tha
Leucadendron salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos Co
Leucadendron salignum
Aspalathus asparagoides
Hermannia angularis
Metalasia acuta
Helichrysum cymosum
Bobartia aphylla
Pelargonium fruticosum
mmunity
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
91
Tliamnocliortus cinereus Subcommunity
Thamnochortus cinereus -hi
Polygala microlopha -s2
Cliffortia sp. (Victor 313) -s2
Helichrysum felinum -hi
Fuirena hirsuta -hi
Tetraria microstachys -hi
Printzia poli folia -hi
Protea neriifolia Subcommunity
Protea neriifolia
Hermannia althaeifolia Subcommunity
Hermannia althaeifolia -hi
Hibiscus aethiopicus -hi
Ursinia saxatilis -hi
Ficinia albicans -hi
Clutia alaternoides -s2
Relhania pungens -s2
Chrysanthemoides monilifera -s2
Diospyros lycioides -s2
Aspalathus kougaensis -s2
Tritoniopsis antholyza -hi
Gerbera serrata -hi
Ficinia quinquangularis -hi
Ischyrolepis triflora -hi
Themeda triandra -hi
Acacia mearnsii facies
Acacia mearnsii -t3
Leptospermum laevigatum -t3
32 |. . |br3.b| I | . | . + r | | 1 . | I ■ |
Relhania calycina-Phylica confusa Fvnbos Community
Relhania calycina -hi
Vise um capense -hi
Helichrysum tereti folium -hi
Cassytha ciliolata -hi
Carpobrotus edulis -hi
Stoebe microphylla -hi
Secamone alpini -hi
Tetraria robusta -hi
Tetraria compressa -hi
Eriocephalus africanus Subcommunity
Eriocephalus africanus -s2
Ficinia repens -hi
b+b+a+aaal
+++ .
b.3. .r.3. I . I | .
I . I .
Ruschia teneila-Gazania rigens Coastal Rocky Headland Community
Ruschia tenella -hi
Limonium scabrum agg. -hi
Gazania rigens -hi
Drosanthemum marinum agg. -hi
Tetragonia decumbens -hi
Sporobolus virginicus -hi
Sarcocaulon natalense -hi
Carpobrotus deliciosus -hi
Thesidium fragile -hi
Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus-Ruschia tenella Coastal Scrub Community
Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus -s2
Sideroxylon inerme -s2
Delosperma edwardsiae -hi
Cineraria britteniae -hi
Ir.r. I
I I
I - - r . |
I I
bb45 . . .
. . .r . . .b.
. . a . b . . . .
Other native spp. common to coastal fynbos
Passerina vulgaris
Erica discolor
Phylica confusa
Cliffortia serpylli folia
Agathosma ovata
Colpoon compressum
Agathosma apiculata
Indigofera heterophylla
Lampranthus sociorum
Thesidium podocarpum
Chironia baccifera
Crassula sp.
Oxalis sp.
Invasive alien spp.
Acacia cy clops
Acacia cy clops
Pinus pinaster
Pinus pinaster
Leptospermum laevigatum
Casuarina sp.
Leptospermum laevigatum
Acacia mearnsii
Hakea sericea
92
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 2. — Classification of the vegetation of the coastal cliff habitats south of George, South Africa (cont.)
other fynbos communities in the study area, mostly due
to an absence of a distinct restioid stratum. The commu-
nity is exposed to sun and wind and is consequently hot
and dry. Compounding this dryness, the soils are gener-
ally shallow and stony due to natural surface erosion at
the summit of these cliffs. Slopes vary from flat to mod-
erate. The community tends to grade into thicket inland,
often with a tall Passerina belt before the true thicket.
There is a high degree of invasion by Acacia cyclops
(present in 78% of releves), possibly causing habitat
modification, which could ultimately lead to irreversible
changes in species composition and vegetation struc-
ture.
Ba. Tetraria cuspidata Subcommunity
This subcommunity has the same dominant and com-
mon species as the Community itself, but with Viscum
capense as a common species. It is usually found more
inland of the other subcommunity suggesting that the
two subcommunities form a gradient from lower altitude
to wind-protected inland plant communities.
Bb. Eriocephalus africanus Subcommunity
Transition to lower altitude, steep-slope communities.
It has slightly steeper slopes than the typical cliff summit
community and is often moderately exposed to the influ-
ence of salt spray. There are also higher soil conductivi-
ty levels, which can be attributed to higher levels of
wind-home salt effects (see below). Pterocelastrus tricus-
pidatus and Lampranthus sociorum are occasionally pre-
sent. This community is further marked by the absence
of: Tetraria cuspidata, Viscum capense and Syncarpha
paniculata.
C. Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus-Ruschia tenella Coastal
Scrub Community
The woody component of this community reflects the
species composition of the coastal scrub in the deeply
incised valleys along this coastline and there is possibly a
floristic gradient from this community into thicket on
other steep slopes. Diagnostic species: Pterocelastrus tri-
cuspidatus as well as infrequent occurrence of Sideroxylon
inerme, Delosperma edwardsiae and Cineraria britteniae.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
93
BP
o
<D
O
O.
£
94
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 3. — Generalised profile
diagram of coastal area south
of George indicating the spa-
tial relationship of communi-
ties to one another and the
sea.
Common or dominant species: Passerina vulgaris,
Phylica confusa, Lampranthus sociorum, Agathosma ovata
and Eriocephalus africanus, as well as the shrub Colpoon
compressum. Shrubs are wind-cropped to a maximum of
1 m, and the total aerial cover of the vegetation averages
60%. A facies, dominated by Sporobolus virginicus (Table
2, rel. 62), was distinguished within this community.
D. Gazania rigens-Limonium scabrum Rocky Headland
Community
Salt-tolerant asteraceous Gazania rigens var. uniflora
and a taxon from the Limonium scabrum complex ac-
companied by mesembs such as Drosanthemum mari-
num and Ruschia tenella, as well as other leaf succulents
such as Crassula sp. and Sarcocaulon natalense, form an
assemblage typical of the exposed rocky headlands in the
southern Cape.
Community C and the rocky headland ‘herbland’
Community D have many species in common, which can
be ascribed to a so-called neighbourhood effect (or mass
effect; Shmida & Wilson 1985). Naturally, the exposed
Community D is virtually lacking (except of Sarco-
caulon natalense) in its ‘own’ diagnostic species because
of the environmental stress in the form of deposition of
wind-borne salt that poses a major selective pressure on
the potential species pool.
Due to the low altitude this community is greatly
exposed to the influence of the wind and especially to
salt spray (Figure 3). The vegetation has a very low cover
and is wind-cropped. The average height of the vegeta-
tion is between 0.13 and 0.33 m. Of all the community
types, this one is lowest in species richness with a mean
of 10 species on average. Shallow soil covering granite
rocks is characteristic, and is often less than 5 cm deep
and very stony. Surface boulders are often present and
modify the microhabitat to some degree. A facies with
Gazania rigens var. uniflora was distinguished within
this community (Table 2, rel. 68).
This species composition corresponds with the
description of similar rocky headland communities
described for other parts of the coastline at Plettenberg
Bay (Hellstrom 1990) and Port Alfred (Lubke 1983).
Gradient analysis
The ordination of the fynbos communities (Figure 4)
revealed a horseshoe structure allowing the direct recog-
nition of a coenocline spanning two fynbos communities
AXIS 1
FIGURE 4. — Ordination of fynbos
vegetation using Principal
Coordinates Analysis. +, re-
leves of the Relhania calyci-
na-Phylica confusa Fynbos
Community; O, releves of
the Leucadendron salignum-
Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos
Community.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
95
TABLE 3. — Soil properties for communities (mean with standard deviation in brackets)
A, Leitcadendron salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos Community; B, Relhania calycina-Phylica confusa Fynbos Community; C,
Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus-Ruschia tenella Coastal Scrub Community; D, Gazania rigens-Limonium scabrum Rocky Headland Community.
along Axis 1 of the scatter diagram. There was a clear
separation along this coenocline between the Relhania
calycina-Phylica confusa Fynbos Community and the
Leucadendron salignum-Tetraria cuspidata Fynbos
Community. This pattern is interpreted in terms of expo-
sure to wind and salt spray as reflected in topographical
features and soil properties.
A classification scheme accompanied by associated
environmental relationships (Figure 2) suggests that the
Leucadendron salignum-Tetraria cuspidata Fynbos
Community occurs on deep soils inland of the cliff sum-
mits where the vegetation is protected from wind and salt
spray. The Relhania calycina-Passerina vulgaris Fynbos
Community occurs on shallow, stony soils on the cliff
summits, where there is a higher exposure to wind and
salt spray.
Physical soil properties varied from community to
community (Table 3). Cliff summits had the highest pro-
portion of coarse sand, slopes above the cliff summits
had the highest proportion of silt, and steep tall us slopes
and rocky headland slopes had the highest proportions of
medium sand, fine sand and clay. This is a trend in
decreasing sand particle size away from the cliff summit
(below and above) and larger proportion of clay to silt
below the cliff summits (steep tallus slopes and rocky
headland slopes).
Soil conductivity levels showed a decreasing trend as
exposure to wind from the sea decreased. High levels
were recorded on the steep tallus slopes, the cliff sum-
mits and the rocky headland slopes. The two cliff summit
communities showed a difference in conductivity levels
with the Eriocephalus africanus Subcommunity having
higher conductivity measures than the Tetraria cuspida-
ta Subcommunity. These higher conductivity levels were
attributed to higher salinity levels from wind-borne salt
spray effects.
Fire appeared to play an important role in the nature
of the communities especially in the Leucadendron
salignum-Syncarpha paniculata Fynbos Community
where the subcommunities Aa and Ab could be separat-
ed from the subcommunities Ac and Ad based on evi-
dence of recent burning. We suggest that the subcommu-
nities are distributed along a fire-induced succession gra-
dient, but with site-specific effects also coming into play.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are indebted to Gavin Hellstrom, previously of
Cape Nature Conservation, George, for initiating this
study and for the provision of maps, ortho-photographs
and aerial photographs.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J PH. 19S8. Veld types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
AVIS, A M. & LUBKE. R.A. 1985. The effect of wind-borne sand and
salt spray on the growth of Scirpus nodosus in a mobile dune
system. South African Journal of Botany 51:1 00-1 1 0.
BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzuege der
Vegetationskunde, edn 3. Springer- Verlag, Wien.
BOUCHER, C. 1977. A provisional checklist of flowering plants and
ferns in the Cape Hangklip area. Journal of South African
Botany 43: 57-150.
COWLING, R.M. 1984. A syntaxonomic and synecological study in
the Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 15:
175-227.
COWLING, R.M. & HOLMES, RM. 1992. Flora and vegetation. In
R.M. Cowling, The ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire and diver-
sity: 23-61. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
DEACON, H.J., JURY, M R. & ELLIS, F. 1992. Selective regime and
time. In R.M. Cowling, The ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire
and diversity: 6-22. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
HELLSTROM, G. 1990. A phytosociological classification, with man-
agement proposals, of the Robberg Nature Reserve, Plettenberg
Bay. B.Sc. (Hons) thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
HILL, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN — a FORTRAN program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification
of the individuals and attributes. Ecology & Systematics,
Cornell University, Ithaca, N Y.
HOARE, D.B. 1994. Assessing successional effects on plant diversity
in the Goukamma Nature Reserve, southern Cape. B.Sc. (Hons)
thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
JARMAN, M.L. 1986. Conservation priorities in lowland regions of
the Fynbos Biome. South African National Scientific Program-
mes Report No. 87. CSIR, Pretoria.
LOW, A.B & REBELO, A.G. (eds). 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Companion to the vegetation map of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environ-
mental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
LUBKE, R.A. 1983. A survey of the coastal vegetation near Port
Alfred, Eastern Cape. Bothalia 14: 725-738.
PODANI, J. 1993. SYN-TAX-pc. Computer programs for multivariate
data analysis in ecology and systematics. Version 5.0. User's
Guide. Scientia Publishing, Budapest.
PODANI, J 1994. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics.
SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1994. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization, edn 2. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 63.
96
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
SOUTH AFRICAN COMMITTEE FOR STRATIGRAPHY (SACS)
1980 Stratigraphy of South Africa. Part 1. Lithostratigraphy of
the Republic of South Africa, South West Africa/Namibia, and
the Republics of Bophuthatswana, Transkei and Venda. Geo-
logical Survey of South Africa Handbook No. 8. Government
Printer, Pretoria.
SCHULZE, R E. & MCGEE, O S. 1978. Climatic indices and classifi-
cations in relation to the biography of southern Africa. In
M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa.
Junk, The Hague.
SHMIDA, A & WILSON, M.V. 1985. Biological determinants of
species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 12: 1-20.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1985. An analysis of the flowering plants and ferns of
the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. South African Journal
of Botany 51: 1-13.
TAYLOR, H.C. & BOUCHER, C. 1993. Dry coastal ecosystems of the
South African south coast. In E. Van der Maarel, Ecosystems of
the World 2B. Dry coastal ecosystems: Africa, America, Asia
and Oceania. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA)
1972. Soil survey laboratory methods .and procedures for col-
lecting soil samples. Soil Survey Report 1. US Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC.
VAN DER MERWE, C.V. 1979. Plantekologiese aspekte en bestuurs-
probleme van die Goukamma-natuurreservaat. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Pretoria.
WEATHER BUREAU 1994. Monthly weather report for the months
January to December 1994. Weather Bureau, Pretoria.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the
Ziirich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia 1 1 :
309-323.
WESTHOFF, V. & VAN DER MAAREL, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet
approach. In R.H. Whittaker, Ordination and classification of
plant communities. Junk, The Hague.
WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE (WWF) 1999. Southernmost
point of Africa: a gift to the earth. Africa — Environment and
Wildlife Suppl. to 7,3: 9.
Bothalia 30,1: 97-101 (2000)
Checklist of plant species of the coastal fynbos and rocky head-
lands, south of George, South Africa
J.E. VICTOR**, D.B. HOARE* *+ and R.A. LUBKE*
Keywords: checklist, coastal fynbos, endemics, phytogeography, rocky headlands. South Africa, Western Cape
ABSTRACT
A checklist of vascular plants and cryptograms was compiled for the fynbos and rocky headland communities of the
coastal region south of George. The area studied is a 12 km stretch of steep sandstone cliffs forming alternating bays and
headlands situated between Glentana and Wilderness. The plant communities of the natural vegetation inhabiting the coast-
line are a mixture of coastal thicket, riparian thicket, fynbos and rocky headland types. The extent of natural vegetation has
been reduced by the spread of agricultural land and urban development and is under further threat from the spread of natu-
ralised alien invader species, particularly Acacia cyclops. The checklist records the occurrence of 271 taxa including 16
alien species (6% of taxa). Of the flowering plant species recorded, 6% were regional or local endemics.
INTRODUCTION
The study area is a 12 km section of coastline south of
George extending from Rooiklip, southeast of Pacalts-
dorp, to Ghwanobaai, 3 km east of Glentana (see Hoare
et al. 2000 for details). It includes a band of vegetation
within 500 m of the high tide mark on steep sandstone
cliffs which form alternating bays and headlands. The
plant communities of the natural vegetation along the
coastline are a mixture of coastal thicket, riparian thick-
et, fynbos and rocky headland types. The study was con-
fined to the fynbos and rocky headland vegetation.
Riparian thicket, dune thicket, dense alien stands and
agricultural lands were not sampled. Rainfall along this
section of coastline occurs throughout the year, but with
three distinct peaks in spring, summer and autumn
(Hoare et al. 2000). Because of its close proximity to the
sea, vegetation structure and composition are greatly
influenced by oceanic winds. The extent of the natural
vegetation has been reduced by the spread of agricultur-
al land and urban activities and is under further threat
from the spread of naturalised alien species, particularly
Acacia cyclops.
This study area falls into that part of the Fynbos
Biome called Limestone Fynbos of the Mossel Bay
District (Low & Rebelo 1996) of which ± 14% is con-
served and 40% transformed, although the recent procla-
mation of the Agulhas National Park may affect these
statistics. The particular study area is of interest because
of its scenic beauty and its location in the centre of the
Garden Route— a popular tourist attraction. Most of the
study area is owned by private landowners who have
used the land mostly for agriculture (in places agricultur-
al lands extend to within a few metres of the summit of
the coastal cliffs), but also for plantation forestry on a
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
* Department of Botany, Rhodes University, 6140 Grahamstown,
South Africa.
t Present address: Agricultural Research Council, Range & Forage
Institute, Private Bag X05, 0039 Lynn East, Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-11-29.
small scale. Urban development occurs in nodes, e.g.
Herold’s Bay and Victoria Bay. Recreational activities,
e.g. fishing, occur on a small scale along the coast.
Disturbances related to all these activities have resulted
in invasion by alien trees and shrubs, particularly Acacia
cyclops. Pinus species have spread from the plantations
and are also a potentially serious threat.
The aim of this work was to provide a checklist of the
plant species along this stretch of coastline that can act as
a basic reference for floristic and ecological work and as
a baseline for future development in the region. This
checklist forms a link between checklists and floristic
studies done for the Western Cape coastal region
(Boucher 1977; Taylor 1985), southern Cape coast
(Hellstrom 1990; Hoare 1994; Van der Merwe 1979) and
the Eastern Cape coast (Lubke 1983; Lubke et al. 1988;
Cloete & Lubke 1999). This provides the opportunity for
comprehensive examination of floristic gradients along
the coastal region of the Fynbos Biome.
METHODS
Fieldwork was done in all four seasons of the year to
cover as many flowering times as possible. Voucher
specimens of most taxa were deposited in the National
Herbarium, Pretoria, and additional taxa listed were
obtained from sight records made during the course of
fieldwork. The herbarium collection at PRE was consult-
ed to obtain records of plant species previously collected
in the study area, and these were added to the checklist.
RESULTS
The checklist lists 271 taxa comprising nine lichen
species, three bryophytes, three pteridophytes, two gymno-
sperms, 56 monocotyledons and 198 dicotyledons (Table
1). The most commonly represented angiosperm families
(Table 2) are Asteraceae (15% of species), Poaceae (7%),
Cyperaceae (6%), Fabaceae (6%), Mesembryanthema-
ceae (5%), Ericaceae (5%) and Crassulaceae (4%). The
genera with the most species are Erica (11), Crassula
(11), Aspalathus (8) and Helichrysum (6). Ficinia, Lam-
98
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 1 . — Number of families, genera and species recorded in the
vegetation of the coast south of George
pranthus, Phylica and Hermannia were each represented
by five species.
All of the 20 largest genera listed for the Cape flora by
Bond & Goldblatt (1984) are represented in this coastal
area, as are 13 of the 15 largest families. Of the 16 alien
species recorded, Acacia Cyclops was by far the most
abundant.
Some 230 flowering plant species were classified
according to phytogeographical range and affinity (Table
3). It was found that 35% are endemic to the Fynbos
Biome and 7% are regional (southern Cape) endemics
and one was a local endemic — Silene vlokii , which has a
restricted range from Herold’s Bay to Glentana.
DISCUSSION
Asteraceous Coastal Fynbos is defined as having high
asteraceous and non-ericaceous ericoid cover and often
high grass cover (Cowling 1992). Phylica , Passerina,
Agatliosma (and other Diosminae), Aspalathus , Restio and
Cliffortia are listed as dominant genera in this vegetation
type (Cowling 1992), a view which is consistent with what
was found in the study area (Floare et al. 2000).
A comparison of the flora of the study area with those
of the Goukamma Nature Reserve (Table 4) shows that
the number of species and genera in the present study
area is comparatively high in relation to its size, espe-
cially considering that not all vegetation types were sam-
pled. Goukamma Nature Reserve is a larger area but with
TABLE 2. — Families of angiosperms in the study with the highest
number of genera and species
TABLE 3. — Distribution of angiosperms found in the study area
TABLE 4. — Comparison of the indigenous angiosperm flora of the
study area with nearby Goukamma Nature Reserve (Van der
Merwe 1979; Hoare 1994)
Goukamma
Study area Nature
Reserve
fewer species, indicating that there is lower diversity in
the Dune Fynbos and thicket vegetation of that region
compared with the communities along the rocky shore
and promontories of this study area. This coastal region
therefore has a surprisingly high diversity for such a
small area, probably due to its abundance of microhabi-
tats. Further studies encompassing the non-fynbos vege-
tation types should be carried out to contribute to the
knowledge of this relatively understudied and poorly
conserved region.
REFERENCES
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora: a
descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany Suppl.
Vol. 13: 455.
BOUCHER, C. 1977. A provisional checklist of flowering plants and
ferns in the Cape Hangklip area. Journal of South African
Botany 43: 57-80.
BRUM MITT R.K. & POWELL, C.E. 1992. Authors of plant names.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.
CLOETE, E.C. & LUBKE, R.A. 1999. Flora of the Kap River Reserve,
Eastern Cape, South Africa. Bothalia 29: 139-149.
COWLING, R.M. 1992. The ecology of fynbos: nutrients , fire and
diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
HELLSTROM, G. 1990. A phytosociological classification, with man-
agement proposals , of the Robberg Nature Reserve, Plettenberg
Bay. M:Sc. thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
HOARE, D.B. 1994. Assessing successional effects on plant diversity
in the Goukamma Nature Reserve, southern Cape. B.Sc. (Hons)
thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
HOARE, D.B., VICTOR, J.E., LUBKE, R.A. & MUCINA, L. 2000.
Vegetation of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands south of
George, South Africa. Bothalia 30: 87-96.
LOW, A.B. & REBELO, A.G. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Afrairs
& Tourism, Pretoria.
LUBKE, R.A. 1983. A survey of the coastal vegetation near Port
Alfred, eastern Cape. Bothalia 14: 725-738.
LUBKE, R.A., GESS, F.W. & BRUTON, M.N. 1988. A field guide to
the eastern Cape coast. Wildlife Society, Grahamstown.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1985. An analysis of the flowering plants and ferns of
the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. South African Journal
of Botany 51: I -1 3.
VAN DER MERWE. C.V. 1979. Plantekologiese aspekte en bestuurs-
probleme van die Goukamma-natuurreseivaat. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Pretoria.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
99
CHECKLIST
Taxa are arranged alphabetically, and author citations follow Brummitt & Powell (1992). Except for site records, col-
lectors’ names and numbers follow the author citation; specimens are housed at PRE. Naturalised alien species are
marked with an asterisk*. Abbreviations for collectors’ names: Bo, P. Bohnen; Da, G. Davidse; Th, M.F. Thompson;
V, J.E. Victor; VFC, C.M. Van Wyk, A. Fellingham & M. O’Callaghan; V&H, J.E. Victor & D.B. Hoare; Wi, I.J.M.
Williams.
LICHENS
Cladia aggregata (5w.) Nyl., V 327
Cladonia
Chasmariae sp., V 328
chlorphaea (Floerke) Spreng., V 325
Cocciferae sp., V 326
confusa R.Sant., V 324
coniocraea (Floerke) Spreng., V 328b
Pycnoporus sp., V 545
Teloschistes flavicans (Sw.) Norm., V 546
Usnea rubicunda Stirt., V 547
BRYOPHYTES
FUNAR1ACEAE
Funaria hygrometrica Hedw., V 290
PH YLLOGON I ACE AE
Catagonium nitens (Brid.) Card, subsp. maritimum (Hook.) S-H.Lin, V 352
POTTIACEAE
Tortella xanthocarpa (C.Muell.) Broth., V 303
PTERIDOPHYTES
ADIANTACEAE
Cheilanthes hirta Sw. van hirta, V 367
ASPLEN1ACEAE
Asplenium rutifolium (P.J.Bergius) Kunze, V 351, 366
SCHIZAEACEAE
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Sw., V 317
GYMNOSPERMS
PINACEAE
Pinus
^pinaster Aiton
*radiata D.Don
ANGIOSPERMS: MONOCOTYLEDONS
ASPHODELACEAE
Anthericum cooperi Baker, V 561; V&H 43
CYPERACEAE
Ficinia
albicans Nees, V&H 83
cf. gracilis (Pair.) Schrad., V 259, 321 , 329, 359
laciniata (Thunb.) Nees, Da 33719
nigrescens (Schrad.) J.Raynal, V 261, 285 ; V&H 68
repens (Nees) Kunth, V 292
Fuirena hirsuta (P.J.Bergius) P.L. Forbes, V 306
Isolepis tenuissima (Nees) Kunth, V 288
Mariscus
congestus (Vahl) C.B. Clarke, V 557
thunbergii (Vahl) Schrad., V 282
Pycreus polystachyos (Rottb.) Beauv. var. polystachyos, V 287
Schoenoxiphium sparteum (Wahlenb.) C.B. Clarke, Da 33726
Tetraria
bolusii C.B. Clarke, VFC 234
compressa Turrill, V 246; V&H 40
cuspidata (Rottb.) C.B. Clarke, V 242; V&H 78
microstachys (Vahl) Pfeiffer, V 309, 316, 333
Trianoptiles capensis (Steud.) Harv., V 289
HYACINTHACEAE
Lachenalia bulbifera ( Cyr.) Engl., VFC 1 70
Omithogalum sp.
HYPOXIDACEAE
Empodium sp., V 207
Spiloxene trifurcillata (Nel) Fourc., V 335
1RIDACEAE
Babiana fourcadei G.J. Lewis, V 349
Bobartia aphylla (L.f.) Ker Gawl., V 307, 540; V&H 47
Chasmanthe aethiopica (L.) N.E.Br., VFC 171
Freesia
alba ( G.L.Mey.) Gumbleton
leichtlinii Klatt, V 296
Gladiolus floribundus Jacq. subsp. floribundus, Th 609
Hesperantha falcata (L.f.) Ker Gawl., V 213
Micranthus alopecuroides (L.) Rothm., V 558
Tritoniopsis antholyza (Pair.) Goldblatt, V 495
JUNCACEAE
Juncus
acutus L. subsp. leopoldii (Pari.) Snog., V 345
dregeanus Kunth, V 286, 534
ORCHIDACEAE
Disperis capensis (L.) Sw. var. capensis, V 238
Herschelianthe hians (L.f) Rauschert, V 529, 533
POACEAE
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., V 516
Eragrostis
capensis (Thunb.) Trin., V 503
plana Nees, V 511
Ehrharta
calycina J.E.Sm., V 513
capensis Thunb., V 513b; V&H 80
erecta Lam. var. erecta
*Lolium perenne L„ V 524
Paspalum
*dilatatum Pair., V 522
distichum L„ V 517
Pentaschistis eriostoma (Nees) Stapf
Polypogon strictus Nees, V 350
Setaria sphacelata (Schum.) Moss var. sphacelata, V 523
Sporobolus
africanus (Pair.) Robyns & Tournay, V 518
virginicus (L.) Kunth
Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze
Themeda triandra Forssk., V 510
Tribolium uniolae (L.f.) Renvoize, V&H 81
PONTEDERIACEAE
*Eichhomia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laub ., V 562
RESTIONACEAE
Hypodiscus willdenowia (Nees) Mast., Da 33722
Ischyrolepis tnflora (Rottb.) Linder
Restio triticeus Rottb., V 253, 254, 320; V&H 36
Thamnochortus cinereus H P. Linder, V 308; V&H 45
DICOTYLEDONS
ACANTHACEAE
Hypoestes aristata (Vahl) Roem. & Schult. var. thiniorum Balkwill, V 341
AIZOACEAE
Tetragonia
fruticosa L„ V 273
decumbens Mill.
spicata L.f. var. spicata, V 338
virgata Schltr., V&H 42
ANACARDIACEAE
Rhus
crenata Thunb., V 302
glauca Thunb., VFC 177
lucida L. forma lucida, V 208
APIACEAE
Centella virgata (L.f.) Drude, V 319
APOCYNACEAE
Astephanus marginatus Decne.
Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R.Br.
100
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
ASTERACEAE
Arctotheca prostrata (Salisb.) Britten , VFC 185
Athanasia trifurcata (L.) L., V 509
Athrixia capensis Ker Gawl., V 541
Berkheya armata (Vahl) Druce, V 531
Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) Norl. subsp. pisifera (L.) Norl., V 262
Cineraria britteniae Hutch. & RA.Dyer, V&H 39, 71
Cullumia bisulca (Thunb.) Less.
Disparago kraussii Sch. Bip., V 502 ; V&H 58
Elytropappus rhinocerotis (L.f.) Less., V 548
Eriocephalus africanus L., V 244; V&H 33
Felicia
amoena (Sch. Bip.) Levyns, subsp. latifolia Grau, V 536
filifolia (Vent.) Burtt Davy, subsp. bodkinii (Compton) Grau, V 300
Gazania rigens (L.) Gaertn. var. uniflora (L.f.) Rossler, V 294; V&H 75
Gerbera serrata (Thunb.) Druce, V 239; V&H 66
Helichrysum
anomalum Less., V 240, 514
asperum (Thunb.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt var. glabrum Hilliard, V 532
cymosum (L.) D.Don subsp. cymosum, VFC 227
felinum Less., V 322
odoratissimum (L.) Sweet, V 564
teretifolium (L.) D.Don, V 235
Metalasia
acuta Karis, V 217
pungens D.Don, V 247; V&H 52, 54b
Oedera
capensis (L.) Druce, V 236
imbricata Lam., V 267
Othonna camosa Less., var. camosa, V 370
Plecostachys serpyllifolia (Berg.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, V 301
Pnntzia polifolia (L.) Hutch., V 323
Relhania
calycina (L.f.) L’Her. subsp. calycina, V 364
pungens L’Her. subsp. pungens, V 501
Senecio
angulatus L.f, V 348
deltoideus Less., VFC 183
ilicifolius L., V 508
Stoebe
microphylla DC., V 357; V&H 72, 82
plumosa (L.) Thunb., V 304
Syncarpha
canescens (L.) B.Nord.
paniculata (L.) B.Nord.
Tarchonanthus camphoratus L., V 34; V&H 44
Ursinia
heterodonta (DC.) N.E.Br., V 252, 528
saxatilis N.E.Br., V&H 34
BRASSICACEAE
Heliophila subulata DC., V 334, 527
CAMPANULACEAE
Lightfootia
divaricata H.Buek var. debilis (Sond.) Adamson, VFC 95
fasciculata (L.f.) A. DC., V 500
CARYOPHYLLACEAE
Silene vlokii Mass., V 864
*Spergula arvensis L., V 214
CELASTRACEAE
Cassine papillosa (Hochst.) Kuntze
Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus (Lam.) Sond., V 299
Putterlickia pyracantha (L.) Szyszyl., V 549
CHENOPODIACEAE
Sarcocomia natalensis ( Ung.-Sternb.) A.J. Scott var. natalensis
CONVOLVULACEAE
Falkia repens L.f., V 281
CRASSULACEAE
Adromischus caryophyllaceus (Burm.f.) Lem., V 552; V&H 37
Crassula
atropurpurea (Haw.) Dietr. var. atropurpurea, V&H 38
biplanata Haw., VFC 169
decumbens Thunb. var. brachyphylla (Adamson) Tolken, V 215
lactea Soland., V 344
nudicaulis L. var. nudicaulis, V 553
orbicularis L., V 297
rubricaulis Eckl. & Zeyh., V 343
rupestris Thunb. subsp. rupestris, V 551
southii Schbnland subsp. sphaerocephala Tolken, V 223
subulata L. var. fastigiata (Schonland) Tolken, V 382
DROSERACEAE
Drosera sp., V 318
EBENACEAE
Diospyros
dichrophylla (Gand.) De Winter, V 209
lycioides Desf. subsp. lycioides, V&H 49
Euclea
crispa (Thunb.) Guerke subsp. crispa, V 368
natalensis A. DC. subsp obovata F. White, V&H 41
ERICACEAE
Blaeria ericoides L., V 543
Erica
canaliculata Andr., V 212
discolor Andr. var. discolor, V 233, 293
formosa Thunb., V 243, 323, 355; V&H 25, 46
glandulosa Thunb. var. glandulosa, V 555; V&H 48
hispidula L. var. hispidula, V 258, 356
imbricata L., V 354
peltata Andr., V&H 26
speciosa Andr., V 241
triceps Link, V 559
versicolor Wendl.
sp., V&H 24
Salaxis axillaris (Thunb.) G.Don, V 258, 530
EUPHORBIACEAE
Clutia
alatemoides L. var. brevifolia Sond.
laxa Sond., VFC 218
Euphorbia cf. caterviflora N.E.Br., V 272
FABACEAE
Acacia
*cyclops G.Don, V 360
*meamsii De Wild., V 257; V&H 54a
Amphithalea fourcadei Compton, V 358
Aspalathus
alopecurus Benth., V 353; V&H 56
asparagoides L.f. subsp. asparagoides, V&H 21
asparagoides L.f. subsp. rubro-fusca (Eckl. & Zeyh.) R.Dahlgren, V 331
ciliaris L., V 526, V 544
florifera R.Dahlgren, V 248
kougaensis ( R.Dahlgren ) R.Dahlgren, V 266; V&H 22
laricifolia PJ.Bergius subsp. laricifolia, V&H 55
nigra L.
Indigofera heterophylla Thunb., V271; V&H 59, 77
*Lotus subbiflorus Lag., V 505
Rhynchosia
capensis (Burnt.) Schinz, V 315
ciliata (Thunb.) Schinz
*Vicia sativa L., V 381, 560
FUMARIACEAE
*Fumaria muralis Koch subsp. muralis, V 211
GENTIANACEAE
Chironia baccifera L., V 336
GERANIACEAE
Pelargonium
candicans Spreng., V 280
capitatum (L.) L’Her., V&H 74
caucalifolium Jacq. subsp. convolvulifolium ( Kunth ) J.JA.van der
Walt, V 538
fruticosum (Cav.) Willd., V 311
LAM I ACE AE
Stachys graciliflora Presl, VFC 164
LAURACEAE
Cassytha ciliolata Nees, V 227; V&H 76
LOBELIACEAE
Lobelia
bicolor Sims, V&H 61
coronopifolia L., V 255, 537
erinus L., V 520
tomentosa L.f.
Monopsis unidenlata (Dryand.) E.Wimm. subsp. unidentata, V 515
MALVACEAE
Anisodontea scabrosa (L.) Bates, V 279
Hibiscus aethiopicus L. var. ovatus Ha rv., V&H 57
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
101
MESEMB RYANTHEM ACEAE
Carpobrotus
deliciosus (L. Bolus) L. Bolus, V 305
edulis (L.) L. Bolus, V 210
Delosperma
edwardsiae L.Bolus, V 218 , 221, 269, 270; V&H 31
litorale (Kensit) L.Bolus, V 219, 550; V&H 79
Disphyma crassifolium (L.) L.Bolus, V 268
Drosanthemum
brevifolium (Alton) Schwantes, V 222
sp„ V&H 63
Lampranthus
conspicuus (Haw.) N.E.Br., V 260; V&H 64
dependens (L.Bolus) L.Bolus, VFC 180
sociorum (L.Bolus) N.E.Br., V&H 32
stipulaceus (L.) N.E.Br., V 230
sp„ V220
Conophytum bilobum (Marlolh) N.E.Br., VFC 176
Ruschia tenella (Haw.) Schwantes V 565; V&H 65
MYRICACEAE
Myrica quercifolia L.
MYRTACEAE
*Leptospermum laevigatum ( Caertn.) F.Muell., V 264
OLEACEAE
Olea exasperata Jacq.
OXALIDACEAE
Oxalis spp., V 310, 224
PLANTAGINACEAE
*Plantago lanceolata L., V 525
PLUMBAGINACEAE
Limonium scabrum (Thunb.) Kuntze var. scabrum, V&H 60
POLYGALACEAE
Muraltia ericoides (Burm.f.) Steud., V 499
Polygala
fruticosa PJ.Bergius, V 295
microlopha DC. var. gracilis Levyns, V 314
myrtifolia L., V 346
PRIMULACEAE
*Anagallis arvensis L., V 291, 519
PROTEACEAE
*Hakea sericea Schrad., V 361
Protea neriifolia R.Br., V 237
Leucadendron salignum P J.Bergius, V 263
RANUNCULACEAE
Knowltonia vesicatoria (Lf) Sims subsp. grossa H.Rasm., V 340
RHAMNACEAE
Phylica
axillaris Lam.
var. axillaris, VFC 1 74
var. maritima Pillans, VFC 228
confusa Pillans, V&H 50
purpurea Sond. var. pearsonii Pillans, V 245
strigulosa Sond., V&H 29
ROSACE AE
Cliffortia
falcata L.f., V 265
serpyllifolia Cham. & Schlechtd., V 228, 542
sp„ V313
RUB I ACEAE
Anthospermum
aethiopicum L., V 249, 512
prostratum Sond., V 251
RUTACEAE
Agathosma
apiculata G.F.W.Me y., V 275
capensis (L.) Diimmer, V 312
ovata (Thunb.) Pillans, V 232, 337
Euchaetis burchellii Diimmer, Wi 2310
S ANTAL ACEAE
Colpoon compressum PJ.Bergius, V 229, 342
Thesidium
fragile (Thunb.) Sond.
microcarpum (A.DC.) A.DC., V 231, 298
podocarpum (A.DC.) A.DC., V 278
Thesium
lisae-mariae Stauffer, V 330
nigromontanum Sond., V&H 51
sertulariastrum A.W.Hill, V 226
virgatum Lam., V&H 28
SAPOTACEAE
Sideroxylon inerme L. subsp. inerme, V&H 67
SCROPHULARIACEAE
Graderia scabra (L.f.) Benth., Bo 8157
Phyllopodium rustii (Rolfe) Hilliard, V 284
Sutera
hispida (Thunb.) Druce, VFC 163a
sp„ V277, 339
SELAGINACEAE
Selago
corymbosa L., V 554, 563
dregei Rolfe, VFC 209
sp. nov., V 234, 496
SOLANACEAE
Solanum rigescens Jacq., VFC 178
STERCULIACEAE
Hermannia
althaeifolia L., V 250
angularis Jacq., V 256, 535
holosericea Jacq., V 539
lavandulifolia L., V 283
salviifolia L.f. var. salviifolia, V 507
THYMELAEACEAE
Passerina
falcifolia C.H. Wright, V 556
vulgaris Thoday, V 498
Struthiola
ciliata (L.) Lam. subsp. angustifolia (Lam.) Peterson, V 216
parviflora Meisn., V 497
striata Lam., V 504; V&H 73
TILIACEAE
Grewia occidentals L., V 521
VERBENACEAE
*Verbena bonariensis L., V 506
VISCACEAE
Viscum capense L.f. subsp. hoolei Wiens, V 225
ZYGOPHYLLACEAE
Zygophyllum morgsana L., V 274, 369
Bothalia 30,1: 103-110(2000)
Miscellaneous notes
POACEAE
APOMICTIC EMBRYO SAC DEVELOPMENT IN CENCHRUS CILIARIS (PANICOIDEAE)
Apomixis is distributed throughout the plant kingdom
and is known in over 300 species of at least 35 different
families (Hanna & Bashaw 1987). Research on apomix-
is in grasses began in the early 1 930’s with Poa praten-
sis L. (Miintzing 1933). Apomixis is especially prevalent
among perennial forage grasses and has been reported in
more than 125 species representing most of the tribes.
Well-known apomictic grasses include Paspalum dilata-
tum Poir. (Snyder 1957), P. notatum Fluegge (Snyder
1957), Setaria P.Beauv. (Emery 1957) and Cenchrus cil-
iaris L. (Fisher et al. 1954; Snyder et al. 1955).
Apomixis in the angiosperms means asexual reproduc-
tion by seeds (Nogler 1984). In this study reduced
embryo sacs (embryo sacs in which meiosis occurs)
imply sexual reproduction, whereas unreduced embryo
sacs imply asexual or apomictic reproduction.
The aim of this study is to determine whether reduced
embryo sacs are formed in C. ciliaris specimens includ-
ed in this study. The type of embryo sac will give an indi-
cation of the sexual or apomictic nature of the species
and will suggest to what extent cross-fertilisation con-
tributed to the genetic variation in this species.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The plant material used in this study was collected in
the field (Table 1). A selection from the material, col-
lected for meiotic analysis, was used to study embryo
sac development. Florets in various developmental
stages were used. Inflorescences were dehydrated with
ethanol and tertiary buthanol before being embedded in
pastulated Paraffin wax. Sections (6 |im) were cut with
a rotary microtome, mounted and stained with a modi-
fied (Spies & du Plessis 1986) safranin (Johansen 1940)
and fast green (Sass 1951) procedure. A minimum of
twenty embryo sacs per developmental stage were stud-
ied in each specimen. A Nikon photomicroscope and
Ilford Pan-F film (ASA 50) were used for the photomi-
crographs.
RESULTS
Embryo sac development was studied in 27 speci-
mens, representing four different ploidy levels (Table 1)
The nucellus was multiseriate and protected by various
TABLE 1. — List of Cenchrus ciliaris specimens with Panicum type of embryo sacs, their localities and their
chromosome number (B-chromosomes are abbreviated as B)
104
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
• A*; . ' *1#'V * ■' n
tr jr, * .4 -
'&<•$ 4m
* w. E :»••**%
'* *
.
‘as* >.
CM*
.in
Hk
' vi
FIGURE 1 . — Photomicrographs of unreduced embryo sac development of the Panicum type in ovules of Cenchrus ciliaris. A, B, Spies
5240 A, three embryo sacs in ovule with only two visible in this section; two nuclei in micropylar region of one embryo sac
resembling either an egg nucleus and a synergid or two synergids, with one chalazal polar nucleus; B, next section of ovule in
A, three embryo sacs visible; third nucleus of embryo sac in A in micropylar region, representing either an egg or a synergid.
C-E, Spies 5232: C, two embryo sacs per ovule; two nuclei in micropylar region, resembling an egg nucleus and a single syn-
ergid, with one chalazal polar nucleus; D, second section of ovule in C with a second polar nucleus in chalazal region of
embryo sac; E, at least four unreduced embryo sacs in mature ovule. F, Spies 5488 , at least five unreduced embryo sacs in
mature ovule. Scale bar; lOpm.
multicellular integuments. Some of the integuments
completed their development at a relatively late stage.
The archesporial cell functioned directly as the primary
megasporocyte. One or more somatic cells with promi-
nent nuclei, lying in the centre of the nucellus, also
enlarged. These cells soon obscured all traces of the
degenerated gametophyte. These cells had dense cyto-
plasms and were usually adjacent to the sporogenous
material The nuclei of the aposporous cells underwent
one to several divisions and formed a well-defined dyad.
The aposporic embryo sacs are extremely vacuolated
and mature embryo sacs usually contained four nuclei.
Some of the nuclei resembled the egg and polar cells of
a reduced embryo sac. These embryo sacs usually
included one polar nucleus, an egg nucleus and two syn-
ergid cells (Figure 1A, B). Some embryo sacs included
an egg nucleus, one synergid cell and two polar nuclei
(Figure 1C, D). These unreduced embryo sacs were clas-
sified as four nucleated Panicum type aposporic embryo
sacs (Figure 1 A, D).
Bothalia 30, 1 (2000)
105
The total number of aposporic embryo sacs per ovule
varied among the specimens studied (Figure IE, F). A
maximum of eight aposporic embryo sacs per ovule was
observed ( Spies 5239). These multiple embryo sacs were
usually concentrated in the central part of the ovule and,
at maturity, occupied most of the former region of the
nucellus (Figure IE, F).
DISCUSSION
The mechanism of apospory in C. ciliaris involves the
development of the embryo from an unreduced nucleus,
in an embryo sac derived from a somatic cell in the
ovary. These aposporous embryo sacs may develop in the
nucellus of the ovule or in some species in the integu-
ments and ovary wall (Bashaw & Hanna 1990).
Apospory is the apomictic mechanism most common in
the grasses, particulary in the tribe Paniceae, which
accounts for more than 95% of known apomictic species
(Bashaw & Hanna 1990). The origin of aposporous cells
in the grass ovule is quite different from the normal pat-
tern of sexual megasporogenesis (Bashaw 1980). Early
development of the megaspore mother cell is usually
identical in aposporous and sexual ovules. In both cases,
the megaspore mother cell differentiates in the hypoder-
mal layer of the nucellus in the micropylar region, during
the enlargement stage of the young ovule. Meiosis in
both aposporous and sexual ovules generally results in a
linear tetrad. The similarity between apospory and sexu-
al embryo sac development ends at this point (Bashaw &
Hanna 1990).
Aposporic development in C. ciliaris is initiated by
the unusual enlargement of one or more somatic (nucel-
lus) cells. These cells, in comparison to the normal
nucellar cells, usually have prominent nuclei and dense
cytoplasms. The nucleus of the aposporous cell initially
undergoes one to several mitotic divisions. The degree of
differentiation of aposporous embryo sacs in C. ciliaris
varies. In some grass species, one or more of the
aposporous sacs may develop to the extent that they
closely resemble the typical sexual embryo sac (Bashaw
& Hanna 1990). This is not the case in C. ciliaris , for a
four-nucleated embryo sac was most often observed
(Figure 1A-D). This included a polar nucleus, an egg
nucleus and two synergid cells (Figure 1A, B) or one
egg, one synergid and two polar nuclei (Figure 1C, D).
Antipodal cells were completely lacking. The embryo
sacs observed were, therefore, classified as unreduced
aposporic embryo sacs, of the Panicum type. This find-
ing corresponds with previous reports by various authors
(Bashaw & Holt 1958; Brown & Emery 1958; Bashaw
1962) and is typical of the Panicoideae (Bashaw &
Hanna 1990; Mogie 1992). The number of embryo sacs
of nucellar origin varied from two to eight in Spies 5239.
Occasionally observed, was a cluster of unreduced
embryo sacs which could not be accurately counted.
Various authors have reported a number of ovules in
C. ciliaris containing a single aposporous embryo sac in
the nucellus (Fisher et al. 1954; Bashaw & Hanna 1990).
According to their reports, these sacs were centrally
located, in the micropylar region of the ovule, and occu-
pied more or less the same location and total area as the
sexual gametophyte in sexual plants of this species. This
type of embryo sac development was not observed in the
current study, in which the mimimum number of embryo
sacs present in the ovule, was two.
The variation in the arrangement of structures of the
aposporous embryo sacs (Figure 1A-D) is characteristic
of C. ciliaris. This embryological variation corresponds
with the variation observed on chromosome level (Visser
et al. 1998a, b, c). This species is morphologically (De
Lisle 1963) and cytogenetically highly polymorphic and
complex. Chromosome abnormalities, observed during
meiosis, and varying polyploid levels were common
(Visser et al. 1998a, b, c). The various polyploid natures
(varying from autosegmental-alloploidy to pure allo-
ploidy) indicated the presence of hybridization (Visser et
al. 1998a, b, c). However, during this study, no correla-
tion was found between ploidy level and embryo sac
development or cell morphology during embryo sac
development. The absence of any suggestion of sexual
reproduction in the specimens studied, indicates either
that the genetic variation originated before these plants
became obligate apomicts, or that the frequency of sexu-
ality is extremely low. The latter possibility is contra-
dicted by the genetic variation observed in these speci-
mens.
When Taliaferro & Bashaw (1966) discovered a sex-
ual plant, they investigated the inheritance of apomixis in
C. ciliaris. The plant was an obligate sexually reproduc-
ing specimen, but heterozygous for the method of repro-
duction. The progeny, after selfing, was either obligate
sexual or obligate apomictic, indicating the heterozygous
nature of this specimen. Based on their data, Bashaw &
Hanna (1990) suggested that the mode of reproduction is
controlled by two different genes, with epistasis favour-
ing dominant expression of the gene for sexuality. They
proposed that the genotype of the sexual plant was AaBb
and that of the two apomictic cultivars were Aabb. Their
hypothesis assumed that dominant gene B conditions
sexual reproduction and is epistatic to dominant gene A,
which conditions apospory. Due to the absence of domi-
nant gene A, a double recessive aabb was expected to
reproduce sexually. Gene A, therefore, controls all of the
processes resulting in development of unreduced nucel-
lar embryo sacs and abortion of the normal sexual
sporogenous tissue (Bashaw & Hanna 1990).
The genetic inheritance of apomixis suggests that a
small percentage of sexual plants representing C. ciliaris
may still prevail in nature. It is accepted that sexual or
partially sexual plants probably exist in most apomictic
species. Based on this fact, facultative apomicts are
claimed to precede obligate apomicts in the development
of the agamic complex (Bashaw & Hanna 1990).
Clausen (1954) described facultative apomixis as an evo-
lutionary equilibrium system in which the apomictic
process is in balance with an almost dormant sexual
process, which can be invoked and can release a part of
the stored sexual variability for a certain period. In the
geographic distribution of C. ciliaris , completely sexual,
facultative and obligate plants may still be present.
Sexually reproducing plants serve as foundation for the
considerable genetic variation found among, and in, popu-
lations representing this species. Facultative apomictic
106
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
plants are, therefore, a seemingly dormant but effective
source of variation, for heterozygous genotypes are pro-
duced each time when sexual and apomictic plants
hybridize (Bashaw et al. 1970).
Although no reduced embryo sacs (suggesting sexual
reproduction) were observed during the current study,
chromomosomal and morphological differences were
observed in plants representing a specific region. This
indicates that a small percentage of specimens of C. cil-
iaris have to be facultative apomicts, for the offspring
were not exact replicas of the maternal plants. It is con-
cluded that both facultative and obligate apomixis are
present in C. ciliaris. This conclusion is based on the
presence of more genetic variation than can be account-
ed for by mutations alone. There may also be sexual
specimens in nature, but they were not found and sam-
pled during this study.
CONCLUSIONS
Apospory as a mode of asexual reproduction is com-
mon in the Poaceae. It involves the development of an
embryo from an unreduced nucleus, in an embryo sac
derived from a somatic cell. Aposporic development in
C. ciliaris varies, for this type of development is initiat-
ed in various somatic cells simultaneously, and leads to
the maturing of various numbers of embryo sacs in the
ovule.
Embryological variations regarding embryo sac
development were observed in this species. These
aposporous embryo sacs were characterized as unre-
duced four-nucleated embryo sacs of the Panicum type.
Although the presence of cytogenetic and morphological
variation indicates that this species may be characterized
as a facultative apomictic species, all ploidy levels
appear to be obligate apomicts. This suggests that the
morphological and/or genetic variation originated before
obligate apomixis occurred.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The University of the Orange Free State and the
Foundation for Research and Development are thanked
for financial assistance during this study.
REFERENCES
BASHAW, E.C. 1962. Apomixis and sexuality in buffelgrass. Crop
Science 2: 4 1 2 — 4 15.
BASHAW, E.C. 1980. Apomixis and its application in crop improve-
ment. In W.R. Fehr & H.H. Hadley, Hybridization of crop plants ,
ASA Press, Madison, WI, USA.
BASHAW, E.C. & HANNA, W.W. 1990. Apomictic reproduction. In
G.P Chapman, Reproductive versatility in the grasses. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
BASHAW, E.C. & HOLT, E.C. 1958. Megasporogenesis, embryo-sac
development and embryogenesis in dallisgrass, Paspalum dila-
tation Poir. Agronomy Journal 50: 753-756.
BASHAW, E.C., HOVIN, A.W. & HOLT, E.C. 1970. Apomixis, its evo-
lutionary significance and utilization in plant breeding. Pro-
ceedings of the International Grassland Congress 1 1 : 245-248.
BROWN, W.V. & EMERY, W.H.P. 1958. Apomixis in the Gramineae:
Panicoideae. American Journal of Botany 45: 253-263.
CLAUSEN, J 1954. Partial apomixis as an equilibrium system in evo-
lution. Caryologia 6, Suppl.: 469 — 479 .
DE LISLE, D G. 1963. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus
Cenchrus. Iowa State Journal of Science 37: 259-351.
EMERY, W.H.P. 1957. A study of reproduction in Setaria macro-
stachya and its relatives in the Southwestern United States and
Northern Mexico. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 84: 106-121.
FISHER, W.D.. BASHAW, E.C. & HOLT, E.C. 1954. Evidence for
apomixis in Pennisetum ciliare and Cenchrus setigerus. Agro-
nomy Journal 46: 401^104.
HANNA, W.W. & BASHAW, E.C. 1987. Apomixis: its identification and
use in plant breeding. Crop Science 27: 1136-1139.
JOHANSEN, D.A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.
MOGIE, M. 1992. The evolution of asexual reproduction in plants.
Chapman & Hall, London.
MUNTZING, A. 1933. Apomictic and sexual seed formation in Poa.
Hereditas 26: 1 1 5-190.
NOGLER, G.A. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In B.M. Johri, Em-
bryology of angiosperms. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
SASS, J.E. 1951. Botanical microtechnique. Iowa State College Press,
Ames.
SNYDER, L.A. 1957. Apomixis in Paspalum secans. American Jour-
nal of Botany 44: 3 1 8-324.
SNYDER, L.A., HERNANDEZ, A.R. & WARMKE, H E. 1955. The
mechanism of apomixis in Pennisetum ciliare. Botanical Ga-
zette 116: 209-221.
SPIES, J.J & DU PLESSIS, H 1986. The genus Rubus in South Africa.
III. The occurrence of apomixis and sexuality. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 226-232.
TALIAFERRO, C M. & BASHAW, E.C. 1966. Inheritance and control
of obligate apomixis in breeding buffelgrass, Pennisetum cil-
iare. Crop Science 6: 473-476.
VISSER, N.C., SPIES, J.J. & VENTER, H.J.T 1998a. Uneven segre-
gation of chromosomes: a possible source of aneuploidy in
Cenchrus ciliaris (Poaceae: Paniceae). South African Journal of
Botany 64: 130-136.
VISSER, N.C., SPIES, J.J. & VENTER, H.J.T. 1998b. Meiotic chro-
mosome behaviour in Cenchrus ciliaris (Poaceae: Panicoi-
deae). Bothalia 28: 83-90.
VISSER, N.C., SPIES, J.J. & VENTER, H.J.T. 1998c. Aneuploidy in
Cenchrus ciliaris (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae): truth or fic-
tion? South African Journal of Botany 64: 337-345.
N.C. VISSER* *, J.J. SPIES*+ and H.J.T. VENTER*
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, PO Box 339, 9300 Bloemfontein
*f To whom correspondence should be addressed.
HYACINTHACEAE
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 13. LACHENAL1A MUTABILIS , L. PUSTULATA AND L. UNICOLOR
The genus Lachenalia Jacq.f. ex Murray consists of
small bulbous geophytes and shows a great potential for
use as pot plants (Niederwieser et al. 1997). Various
chromosome numbers, and even different basic chromo-
some numbers, have been reported for this genus
(Moffett 1936; Dc Wet 1957; Riley 1962; Mogford 1978;
Ornduff & Watters 1978; Nordenstam 1982; Crosby
1986; Hancke & Liebenberg 1990; Hancke 1991; John-
son & Brandham 1997; Kleynhans 1997; Flancke &
Liebenberg 1998; Kleynhans & Spies 1999).
Lachenalia mutabilis Sweet belongs to the L.
orchioides group (Crosby 1986) and the chromosome
numbers reported for this species vary from 2n = 10
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
107
(Ornduff & Watters 1978; Johnson & Brandham 1997) to
2n = 14 (De Wet 1957; Johnson & Brandham 1997) and
56 (De Wet 1957).
Lachenalia pustulata Jacq. and L. unicolor Jacq. are
closely related species, growing in the southwestern
Cape. Both species are classified as part of the L. unicol-
or group (Crosby 1986), and Duncan (1988) suggested
that these species might be combined, due to their mor-
phological similarities. Somatic chromosome numbers of
2n = 16 have been reported for both species by De Wet
(1957), Hancke (1991), Johnson & Brandham (1997)
and Kleynhans (1997).
The aim of this paper is to determine the chromosome
numbers of the three species and to determine whether
any correlation exists between chromosome number and
geographical distribution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens were collected in the field throughout the
geographical distribution area of each species and vege-
tative material of each plant collected was grown sepa-
rately in the nurseries of ARC Roodeplaat and the
Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the
Orange Free State, Bloemfontein. Voucher specimens are
housed in the Geo Potts Herbarium (BLFU) at the uni-
versity (Table 2).
Bulbs were grown on Deco gel™ and actively grow-
ing root tips were cut and placed in water at 4°C for 24
hours. The root tips were fixed in Carnoy’s (1886) fixa-
tive for 24—36 hours, hydrolysed in IN HC1 at 60°C for
7 minutes and stained with 0.5% leucobasic fuchsin for
two hours (Darlington & LaCour 1976). Squashes were
made in 1% aceto-orcein (Darlington & LaCour 1976).
Slides were permanently mounted in Euparal (Darling-
ton & LaCour 1976).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Lachenalia mutabilis : this species is morphologically
extremely variable. It is naturally distributed throughout
Namaqualand to south of Riviersonderend (Duncan
1988). During this study 35 specimens, representing 16
populations have been studied cytogenetically. The spec-
imens studied represent the central and northern geo-
graphical distribution area of this species (Figure 2).
Somatic chromosome numbers of 12 (Figure 3A, B),
14 (Figure 3C-G) and 24 (Figure 3H) w'ere observed
during this study (Table 2). The numbers based on x = 7
confirm a previous report on this species (De Wet 1957).
The numbers based on x = 6 present a new basic chro-
mosome number for this species. Although collected in
the same geographical area as the two specimens studied
by Ornduff & Watters (1978), no specimens with x = 5
were observed during this study. Six further specimens
from unknown localities with 2n = 10 were studied by
Johnson & Brandham (1997).
Different specimens collected in a given locality
showed no variation in chromosome number. Specimens
FIGURE 2. — Geographical distribution of the Lachenalia populations.
Lachenalia mutabilis specimens, x = 6, •; x = 7, ■ L. pustu-
lata, ▲ ; L. unicolor, ♦.
with lower chromosome numbers were mostly collected
in the northern and western areas of the geographical dis-
tribution area of this species (Figure 2). However, an
insufficient number of specimens has been studied to test
the validity of this observation.
Three hypotheses regarding the origin of the different
basic chromosome numbers in one species can be postu-
lated: 1, the original basic chromosome number is 5 and
the misidentification of B-chromosomes is responsible
for the higher basic numbers described; 2, the original
basic chromosome number is 7 and dysploidy leads to
the formation of lower basic chromosome numbers; or 3,
an aneuploid series occurs.
The presence of B-chromosomes in various Lachena-
lia species has been reported by Hancke & Liebenberg
(1990) and Johnson & Brandham (1997). Initial meiotic
studies indicate that the same number of chromosomes is
present in the anthers and in the root tips used during this
study. The initial meiotic study also indicates normal
meiosis with the formation of bivalents only. Therefore,
we reject the hypothesis that misinterpretation of B-chro-
mosomes attributed to the ‘different basic chromosome
numbers’ observed in this species.
Johnson & Brandham (1997) suggested that the dif-
ferent basic chromosome numbers in L. mutabilis can be
attributed to Robertsonian translocations resulting in
dysploidy. However, the chromosome morphology of the
specimens varies. Most specimens contain 4 to 8 very
short chromosomes. The number of short chromosomes
varies between different localities and even between
specimens collected at the same locality. There is no in-
dication of longer chromosomes (as a result of Robert-
108 Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
TABLE 2. — Somatic chromosome numbers of Lachenalia specimens with their voucher numbers and localities. Specimens are listed according
to their locality from north to south and from west to east
Voucher
2n Locality
L. mutabilis
Spies 6750
Spies 6744
Spies 6748, 6753
Spies 6746
Spies 6757-6761
Spies 6774, 6775
Spies 6751
Spies 6747. 6767-6770. 6773. 6776-6778
Spies 6779-6781
Spies 6745
Spies 6784, 6785
Spies 6752
Spies 6749. 6754-6756. 6782. 6783
L. pustulata
Spies 6806, 6807
Spies 6792
Spies 6789
Spies 6788
Spies 6808-6811
Spies 6798-6804, 6816-6823
Spies 6790
Spies 6791
Spies 6797
Spies 6787
Spies 6786, 6793, 6795, 6796, 6805, 6812-6815
Spies 6794
24 NORTHERN CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): near Hondeklipbaai, (-AD).
12 WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): near Vanrhynsdorp, (-DA).
14 WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): near Vanrhynsdorp, (-DA).
12 NORTHERN CAPE. — 31 19 (Calvinia): on top of Vanrhyns Pass, (-AC).
14 NORTHERN CAPE. — 31 19 (Calvinia): along road to Oorlogskloof, (-AC).
12 WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Clanwilliam Nature Reserve, (-AB).
12 WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Elandsbaai, (-AD).
14 WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Clanwilliam, (-BB).
12 WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Sandberg, (-BC).
14 WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): near Citrusdal, (-CA).
14 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Langebaan Nature Reserve, (-AA).
14 WESTERN CAPE — 3318 (Cape Town): near Porterville, (-BB).
14 Unknown.
16 NORTHERN CAPE — 3119 (Calvinia): Oorlogskloof, (-AC).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Algeria, (-BB).
16 NORTHERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): near Aurora, (-DC).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3317 (Saldanha): near Saldanha, (-BB).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Langebaan, (-AA).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Langebaan Nature Reserve, (-AA).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Postberg, (-AA).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Darling, (-AD).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Mamre Road, (-BC).
16 WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Kampsbaai, (-CD).
16 Unknown.
16/32 Unknown.
L. unicolor
Spies 6827 16
Spies 6828 1 6
Spies 6831 16
Spies 6853-6856 1 6
Spies 6829 16
Spies 6857 16
Spies 6837, 6838 16
Spies 6825 1 6
Spies 6844-6846 1 6
Spies 6835 16
Spies 6833, 6834, 6843 16
Spies 6830 16
Spies 6824, 6826, 6832, 6836, 6839-6842, 6847-6852 16
WESTERN CAPE.— 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Vredendal, (-CB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Unionskraal, (-DB).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Nieuwoudtville, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE — 3217 (Vredenburg): Abdolsbaai, (-DD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Verlorevlei, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Clanwilliam, (-BB).
WESTERN CAPE — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Velddrif, (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg, (-DD).
NORTHERN CAPE.— 3220 (Sutherland): Aurora, (-DC).
WESTERN CAPE — 3318 (Cape Town): Darling, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3318 (Cape Town): Porterville, (-BB).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3319 (Worcester): Tulbach, (-AC).
Unknown.
sonian translocations) in any specimen or in specimens
with a particular basic chromosome number. Therefore,
no evidence supports the second hypothesis.
At this stage it seems as if an aneuploid series exists in
L. mutabilis. To test this hypothesis, thorough meiotic
studies, including hybrids between some of these speci-
mens, should be completed. The use of in situ hybridiza-
tion techniques will also help to determine the mode of
chromosome evolution in this species. Simultaneously, the
species delimitation should be investigated to determine
whether L. mutabilis represents one variable species or
more than one species, each with its own basic chromo-
some number.
Polyploidy was observed in a specimen with x = 6 dur-
ing this study and De Wet (1957) observed it in one with
x = 7. The tetraploid number obtained during this study
was restricted to a single bulb. All other bulbs obtained
from the original specimen proved to be diploid. The poly-
ploidization process occurred consequently, during culti-
vation. In contrast, De Wet (1957) described an octoploid
specimen, suggesting that various polyploidization pro-
cesses occurred in nature. More specimens should be
studied before any conclusions regarding polyploidy in
this species can be made. Polyploidy is relatively scarce
in this species with only two specimens (5%) exhibiting
this phenomenon. Further studies are needed to determine
the mode of chromosome evolution in L. mutabilis.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
109
FIGURE 3. — Mitotic chromosomes in some Lachenalia mutabilis specimens. A, Spies 6751, 2n = 12; B, Spies 6744, 2n = 12; C, Spies 6760, 2n = 14;
D, Spies 6748, 2n = 14; E, Spies 6757, 2n = 14; F, Spies 6789, 2n = 14; G, Spies 6749, 2n = 14; H, Spies 6750, 2n = 24. Scale bar: 6.5 pm.
Lachenalia pustulata and L. unicolor, during this
study somatic chromosome numbers of 38 L. pustulata
specimens, representing at least 10 different localities,
and 34 L. unicolor specimens, representing at least 12
localities, were determined (Table 2). All specimens
were diploid with 2n = 2x = 16 (Figure 4), except one L.
pustulata specimen, Spies 6794, which was diploid (19
cells) and a single tetraploid cell was observed. This
study confirms published reports on a chromosome num-
ber for L. pustulata (Johnson & Brandham 1997;
Kleynhans 1997) and L. unicolor (De Wet 1957; Hancke
1991; Johnson & Brandham 1997; Kleynhans 1997).
The karyotypes of the two species correspond. Both
species have four chromosomes that are significantly
longer than the other chromosomes. The chromosome
numbers of the species are the same. In order to deter-
mine whether Duncan’s (1988) suggestion of combining
the two species is correct, meiotic chromosome behav-
iour of crosses between these species and pollen viabili-
ty of the hybrids should be studied.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The University of the Orange Free State, the National
Research Foundation and the Roodeplaat Vegetable and
Ornamental Plant Institute are thanked for financial assis-
tance during this study. The latter Institute is also thanked
for collecting and providing the bulbs used in this study.
FIGURE 4. — Mitotic chromosomes
in some Lachenalia pustulata
and L. unicolor specimens. A,
B, L. pustulata : A, Spies 6803,
2n = 16; B, Spies 6798, 2n =
16. C, D, L. unicolor: C, Spies
6838, 2n = 16; D, Spies 6840,
2n = 16. Scale bar: 6.5 pm.
110
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
REFERENCES
CARNOY, J.B. 1886. La cytodierbse de l’oeuf. Cellule 3: 1-92.
CROSBY, T.S. 1986. The genus Lachenalia. The Plimtsman 8:
129-166.
DARLINGTON, C.D. & LACOUR, L.F. 1976. The handling of chro-
mosomes. Allen & Unwin, London.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1957. Chromosome numbers in the Scilleae. Cytologia
22: 145-159.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1988. The Lachenalia handbook. National Botanical
Gardens, Cape Town.
HANCKE, F.L. 1991. 'n Sitotaksonomiese ondersoek van sewe Lache-
nalia spesies vir gebruik in ’n blomteeltprogram. M.Sc. thesis.
University of Pretoria.
HANCKE, F.L. & LIEBENBERG, H. 1990. B-chromosomes in some
Lachenalia species and hybrids. South African Journal of
Botany 56: 659-664.
HANCKE, F.L. & LIEBENBERG, H. 1998. Meiotic studies of inter-
specific Lachenalia hybrids and their parents. South African
Journal of Botany 64: 250-255.
JOHNSON, M A T. & BRANDHAM, PE. 1997. New chromosome
numbers in petaloid monocotyledons and other miscellaneous
angiosperms. Kew Bulletin 52: 121-138.
KLEYNHANS, R. 1997. Genetic variation in Lachenalia bulbifera
M.Sc. thesis, University of the Orange Free State.
KLEYNHANS, R. & SPIES, J.J. 1999. Chromosome number and mor-
phological variation in Lachenalia bulbifera (Hyacinthaceae).
South African Journal of Botany 65: 357-360.
MOFFETT, A. A. 1936. The cytology of Lachenalia. Cytologia 7: 490-
498.
MOGFORD, D.J. 1978. Centromeric heterochromatin in Lachenalia
tricolor (L.) Thunb. South African Journal of Botany 44: 111-
117.
NIEDERWIESER, J.G., ANANDAJAYASEKERAM, P„ COETZEE,
M„ MARTELLA, D„ PIETERSE, B. & MARASAS, C. 1997.
Socio-economic impact of the Lachenalia research program.
SACCAR, Gaborone.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1982. Chromosome numbers of southern African
plants. 2. Journal of South African Botany 48: 273-275.
ORNDUFF, R. & WATTERS, P.J. 1978. Chromosome numbers in
Lachenalia (Liliaceae). Journal of South African Botany 44:
387-390.
RILEY, H P. 1962. Chromosome studies in some South African mono-
cotyledons. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 4: 40-
55.
J.J. SPIES*, J.L. DU PREEZ*, A. MINNAAR*
and R. KLEYNHANS**
* Department of Botany and Genetics (106), University of the Orange
Free State, P.O. Box 339, 9300 Bloemfontein.
** ARC Roodeplaat, Private Bag X293, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1999-08-12.
Bothalia 30,1: 111-122 (2000)
OBITUARIES
LESLIE EDWARD WOSTALL CODD (1908-1999)
Leslie Edward Wostall Codd (Figure 1) was born at
Vants Drift in KwaZulu-Natal on 16th September 1908.
He matriculated at Dundee High School, and from 1925
to 1928 continued his studies at Natal University
College, graduating in 1928 with an M.Sc. with a first
class in botany. A year later he won the Webb Research
Scholarship and continued his studies at Cambridge
University, where he studied genetics under Professor
Engeldon in 1929. In 1930 a Colonial Agriculture Scholar-
ship took him to the Imperial College of Agriculture,
Trinidad, where he worked on the genetics of cotton. He
was employed as a plant breeder in the Department of
Agriculture, British Guiana during the period 1931 to
1936. Here he met and married Cynthia Schmeiders-
mann, a marriage which was to last for 65 years.
In January 1937 he joined the Pasture Research Sec-
tion in the Division of Plant Industry, of the Department
of Agriculture in Pretoria. Subsequently during 1939 he
was appointed Officer in Charge of Prinshof Grass
Breeding Station in Pretoria, a station concerned with the
selection, growing and testing of pasture grasses. Four
years later he obtained a D.Sc. degree at the University
of South Africa, for a thesis on rice breeding.
In 1945 Dr Codd was appointed as Officer in Charge
of the Botanical Survey Section in the Division of
Botany, and remained stationed at Prinshof Experiment
Station. This heralded the start of a career as a botanist
spanning 28 years. During the time that he was in charge
of the Botanical Survey Section and undertaking botani-
cal collections (Figure 2) in the Northern Province, he
became thoroughly acquainted with the flora of these
areas, a knowledge which was to form the basis on which
his later taxonomic research was founded. Plant collect-
ing in the Kruger National Park culminated in his book
Trees and shrubs of the Kruger National Park (Codd
1951) — one of the bestsellers in the Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa series. Several publica-
tions on ecological subjects appeared under his author-
ship during this period.
In 1951 the Division of Botany and Plant Pathology
was split into two, namely the Division of Plant
Pathology and the Division of Botany. In that year, fol-
lowing the retirement of Dr Inez Verdoorn, Dr Codd was
placed in charge of the National Herbarium. In 1956 he
was appointed Assistant Chief of the Division of Botany,
which was later renamed the Botanical Research In-
stitute. On Dr Dyer’s retirement in 1963, Dr Codd was
appointed Director of the Botanical Research Institute, a
post he held until his retirement in 1973.
From the time of his appointment in the organization,
Dr Codd was made responsible for the development of
the Botanical Garden established by the previous direc-
tor, Dr R.A. Dyer. For many years this project received
his special attention. His constant support and encour-
agement, his interest and his live plant collections have
contributed immensely to the growth of the Botanical
Garden. Particularly during the period in which he was
head of Botanical Survey, he was continually on the
lookout for interesting and colourful plants which he col-
lected and had grown in the Botanical Garden for paint-
ing and publication in The Flowering Plants of Africa
series. In fact, Volume 43 of this series is dedicated to Dr
Codd in recognition of this achievement and it records:
‘His special interest in the development of the Pretoria
National Botanic Garden, has contributed so much to
South African Botany’.
During Dr Codd’s tenure of office as Director, the
BRI steadily grew. This is borne out by the fact that dur-
ing 1966, following a public service inspection of the
Institute, two new sections were created, namely a Flora
Research Section and an Economic Botany Section.
Further, a Plant Structure and Function Laboratory was
created in 1969. The number of staff employed rose sig-
nificantly during the following years.
The campaign for a new building, started by the pre-
vious Director, Dr R.A. Dyer, was vigorously promoted
by Dr Codd, and in 1973, nearly 15 years after its initia-
tion, a new milestone was reached when the Botanical
FIGURE 1. — Leslie Edward Wostall Codd (1908-1999).
112
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Research Institute moved to the new building situated in
the Botanical Garden.
As Director and Editor of the publications of the
Botanical Research Institute, Dr Codd made significant
contributions. Under his leadership, strength in scientific
publications became a feature of this Institute. He person-
ally provided the description of sixty-seven of the species
depicted in The Flowering Plants of Africa series, eight of
which were new to science. Plant groups which received
■ his concentrated attention were, amongst others the genera
Albizia , Kniphofia, Erythrina, Schotia, Cassine, the family
Apocynaceae, and in later years, partly after his retire-
ment, the family Lamiaceae. A large part of his research
appeared in Bothalia , the house journal of the former
Botanical Research Institute and of the present National
Botanical Institute. His contributions to the Flora of south-
ern Africa series are significant and cover the families
Apocynaceae, Canellaceae, Loasaceae, the large family
Lamiaceae and the genus Cleome (with L.E. Kers).
He possessed to a marked degree, that special gift,
inherent in all successful taxonomists, of recognising and
storing in his memory, the defining characters of plants
and plant specimens and applying this knowledge to
research. His taxonomic work has remained largely
unchallenged and represents an extremely valuable con-
tribution to South African botanical literature.
He also had the special gift of writing clearly, con-
cisely and fluently with very little revision. This facili-
tated the work of the editorial staff, a fact commented on
to me (B. de W.) on a number of occasions, possibly after
receiving some of my own manuscripts.
His publications number 162 and include many taxa
which were new to science. He is commemorated in the
following: The genus Coddia , Agapanthus coddii , Berk-
heya coddii, Brachystelma coddii, Erythrina x coddii,
Eulophia coddii, Kniphofia coddiana, Lobelia coddii,
Macrotyloma coddii, Rhus coddii, Tulbaghia coddii and
Tylophora coddii.
Dr Codd’s contributions to Botany include plant col-
lections numbering nearly 1 1 000 with many new records
FIGURE 2. — Dr Codd preparing
specimens for pressing in
camp, during the Bernard
Carp Expedition to Barotse-
land, Zambia, August 1952.
and new species among them. His collecting has always
been meticulous, particularly his labelling, and colleagues
frequently stated that his field notes have often enabled
them to return to the exact spot in the veld to find the
plants from which he had collected. His extensive contri-
butions in the form of live plant collections to the Pretoria
Botanical Garden have already been mentioned. His main
collection is deposited in the National Herbarium in
Pretoria. Duplicates can be found in the Kew Herbarium,
London, the Zurich Herbarium, Botanische Staatssamm-
lung Miinchen, Geneva Herbarium and others.
Unlike many scientists, Dr Codd was an extremely
helpful person, who was prepared to spend time to share
his expertise with colleagues and other persons seeking
advice. Numerous amateur botanists including Eve
Palmer, Colonel Charles Scott and many other persons
have benefited from his expertise. Very few of the botan-
ical books published during the last two decades before
the nineties appeared without some reference to encour-
agement and advice received by the authors from him.
Dr Codd played a major role in the affairs of scientif-
ic societies, becoming the president of several of them.
He was intimately concerned with the establishment of
the South African Association of Botanists, was a
founder member and became its first president and an
honorary life member. An active member of the South
African Association for the Advancement of Science, he
served on its Council for many years, ultimately becom-
ing President of Section B (Botany) during 1957-1958.
A strong supporter of the South African Biological
Society, he made significant contributions, served on its
Council for many years also as President in 1961 and
was elected honorary member in 1985, the first to
achieve this honour. As a long-standing member of the
Botanical Society of South Africa he was elected hon-
orary life member.
The excellence of his research was recognised in the
awards of The South African Medal of the South African
Association of Science in 1977, the Medal for Botany by
the South African Association of Botanists in 1979, and
the Senior Captain Scott Memorial Medal of the South
African Biological Society in 1982. In December 1983
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
113
he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Science by the
University of the Witwatersrand and in March 1990 an
Honorary Doctorate by the University of Natal. In the
eulogy preceding the latter award, he was described as:
‘a gifted botanist, possessing a rare combination of qual-
ities— acute perception and intuition, a disciplined scien-
tific mind, painstaking thoroughness and a fine aesthetic
sense.’
Dr Codd was an accomplished sportsman, played
rugby for Cambridge and captained the Trinidad Rugby
Team. He was a gentle person, full of humour, always
fair, appreciative of work well done and a person it was
a pleasure to work with and for. He genuinely appreciat-
ed the objects of his studies, and was quite prepared to
delight in simple things. Many of his colleagues, staff
and friends will recall anecdotes, most of them humor-
ous, which they associate with him. Leo Jones, his tech-
nical assistant in the Prinshof days, was a great teller of
tales, much appreciated by Dr Codd, who would laugh,
in his special way, until the tears ran. One of us (B. de W.)
remembers an early morning in the lowveld travelling on
a sandy narrow track, hemmed in by tall grass, heavily
covered with dew. Suddenly a francolin appeared in front
of the car and waddled frantically down the road refus-
ing to enter the wet grass to get out of the way. The
movement of this little bird, very reminiscent of a fat
lady running hard, was so ludicrous that we burst out
laughing. For several hundred yards two grown men
were laughing uproariously at a small bird! There was a
special feeling between us that day. We had shared some-
thing simple and pleasant.
In his passing on the 2nd March 1999, botany has lost
a special talent, but the legacy left behind is a life rich in
contributions made in the pursuit of the knowledge of
our plant environment.
PUBLICATIONS BY L.E. CODD
CODD, L.E. 1933a. Annual report of the plant breeder. Division Report
of the Department of Agriculture, British Guiana, for 1932.
-1933b. Padi variety trials. Agricultural Journal of British Guiana 4.
-1934a. Increased yield of padi obtained by double transplanting.
Agricultural Journal of British Guiana 5.
-1934b. Vernalisation and its application to rice. Agricultural Journal
of British Guiana 5.
-1934c. Annual report of the plant breeder. Division Report of the
Department of Agriculture, British Guiana, for 1933.
-1935a. Padi variety trials. Agricultural Journal of British Guiana 6.
-1935b. Chlorophyll deficiency in rice. Journal of Heredity 26: 85-87.
-1935c. Annual report of the plant breeder. Division Report of the
Deptartment of Agriculture, British Guiana, for 1934.
-1936a. Rice breeding, 1933-36. Agricultural Journal of British
Guiana 7: 115-128.
-1936b. Padi experiments, 1933-35. Agricultural Journal of British
Guiana 7: 129-141.
-1936c. Annual report of the plant breeder. Division Report of the
Department of Agriculture, British Guiana, for 193 5.
-1940. The Prinshof Grass Breeding Station. Pasture Research in South
Africa. Progress Report No. 1: 19-45.
-1949. The application of ecology to agricultural problems in South
Africa. Report of the African Regional Science Conference 2:
115-119.
-1951. Trees and shrubs of the Kruger National Park. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 26: 1-192.
-1952a. Barleria albostellata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 29: t.
1138.
-1952b. The results of an ecological survey in the Union of South
Africa. Proceedings of the 6th International Grassland
Congress held at Pennsylvania State College 1: 596-601.
-1954a. Halogeton, a dangerous weed. Farming in South Africa 29:
237, 238.
-1954b. Sutera macrantha Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 30: t.
1162.
-1954c. Sutera accrescens. The Flowering Plants of Africa 30: t. 1167.
-1955a. Securidaca longipedunculata. The Flowering Plants of Africa
30: t. 1191.
-1955b. The South African kaffirboom species. African Wild Life 9:
183-190.
-1956a. Notes on certain South African Erythrina species. Bothalia 6:
507-514.
-1956b. The Schotia species of southern Africa. Bothalia 6: 514-533.
-1956c. Rhus batophylla Codd. Bothalia 6: 539, 540.
-1956d. Cissus natalitia (Szyszyl.) Codd. Bothalia 6: 545, 546.
-1956e. Salvia chamelaeagnea. The Flowering Plants of Africa 31: t.
1219.
-1956f. Combretum zeyheri. The Flowering Plants of Africa 31: t.
1230.
-1956g. Mussaenda arcuata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 31: t.
1231.
-1957a. Plectranthus dregei Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 32:
t. 1244.
-1957b. Salvia dolomitica Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 32: t.
1248.
-1957c. Syncolostemon densiflorus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 32:
t. 1252.
— 1 957d. Olinia emarginata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 32: t. 1260.
-1958a. Ziziphus rivularis Codd. Bothalia 7: 31-33.
-1958b. The Albizia species of South Africa. Bothalia 7: 67-82.
-1958c. Experimental techniques and plant taxonomy. South African
Journal of Science 54: 309-18.
-1959a. Kniphofia uvaria. The Flowering Plants of Africa 33: t. 1289.
-1959b. Kniphofia rooperi. The Flowering Plants of Africa 33: t. 1290.
-1959c. Kniphofia porphyrantha. The Flowering Plants of Africa 33: t.
1291.
-1959d. Kniphofia ichopensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 33: t.
1292.
-1960a. Drugs from wild yams. African Wild Life 14: 215-226.
-1960b. Kniphofia albescens Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34:
t. 1325.
-1960c. Kniphofia flammula Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34:
t. 1326.'
-1960d. Kniphofia sarmentosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34: t.
1327.
-1960e. Kniphofia stricta. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34: t. 1328.
-1961a. South African Labiatae: Thorncroftia. Bothalia 7: 429 — 43 1 .
-1961b. South African Labiatae: The Coleus caninus complex.
Bothalia 7: 432^134.
-1961c. Notes on Apocynaceae. Bothalia 7: 447^155.
— 1961d. Review: Flora zambesiaca, vol.l, no. 1. Bothalia 7: 667.
— 1961e. Notes on poisonous plants with special reference to the
Gousiekte problem. Journal of the South African Biological
Society 2: 8-17.
-196 If. New and interesting taxa from southern Africa: Rubiaceae.
Kirkia 1: 108-110.
-1963a. The identity of Kniphofia pumila (Aiton) Kunth and K. cari-
nata C.H. Wright. Journal of South African Botany 29:
145-150.
-1963b. Terminalia sericea. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1407.
-1963c. Erythrina baumii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1412.
-1963d. Coleus mirabilis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1417.
-1963e. Apocynaceae. Flora of southern Africa 26: 244—296.
-1964a. The South African species of Orthosiphon. Bothalia 8: 149-162.
-1964b. Notes on Garcinia gerrardii. Bothalia 8: 174.
-1964c. Graderia linearifolia Codd. Bothalia 8: 176, 177.
-1964d. Kniphofia fluviatilis Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36:
t. 1421.
-1964e. Kniphofia obtusiloba. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1422.
-1964f. Kniphofia baurii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1423.
-1964g. Kniphofia typhoides Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36:
t. 1424. '
-1964h. Thorncroftia longiflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t.
1425.
-1965a. Kniphofia multiflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t. 1445.
-1965b. Kniphofia buchananii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t.
1446 A. ’
-1965c. Kniphofia thodei. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t. 1446B.
-1965d. Kniphofia drepanophylla. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37:
t. 1447.
114
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
-1965e. Kniphofia citrirui. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t. 1448.
— 1 965f. Progress with the Flora of southern Africa. Webbia 19:
901-903.
-1966a. Botanical Research Institute: list of staff and review of work.
Bothalia 8, Suppl.: 1-34.
-1966b. Contemporary botanists and botanical collectors. 2. Leslie
Charles Leach. Bothalia 8, Suppl.: 61-64.
-1966c. Notes on some kniphofias in the eastern Orange Free State.
Bothalia 8, Suppl. 1: 27-31.
-1966d. Salvia africana-lutea. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t.
1461.
-1966e. Notes on Boerhaavia in southern Africa. Bothalia 9: 113-121.
— 1966f. The Cassine complex (Celastraceae). Bothalia 9: 123, 124.
-1966g. The status of the genus Lydenburgia (Celastraceae). Bothalia
9: 124.
-1966h. New species of Kniphofia (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9: 139-142.
-1967a. The status of the genus Notosceptrum Benth. (Liliaceae).
Botaniska Notiser 120: 4 1 — 4 5 .
-1967b. A new species of Canthium (Rubiaceae). Bothalia 9: 345, 346.
-1968a. Notes on the genus Isodon (Benth.) H.Kudo (Labiatae). Taxon
17: 239.
-1968b. Conservation of vegetation in southern Africa: regional syn-
thesis. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 54: 257-260.
-1968c. Progress in the preparation of Flora of southern Africa. Acta
Phytogeographica Suecica 54: 294, 295.
— 1 968d. The conservation status of ecosystems in South Africa. South
African Journal of Science 64: 446^448.
-1969a. Indigenous plants for future gardens: Acanthaceae. Park
Administration 22: 32, 33.
-1969b. Rhus batophylla Codd. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t.
1549.
-1969c. Strophanthus luteolus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t.
1561.
-1969d. The South African species of Kniphofia (Liliaceae). Bothalia
9: 363-513.
-1970. Plectranthus saccatus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 41: t.
1601.
-1971a. Sesamothamnus lugardii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 41:
t. 1640.
-1971b. A new name in Catha (Celastraceae). Bothalia 10: 365.
-1971c. Generic limits in Plectranthus, Coleus and allied genera.
Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 10:
245-252.
-1972. Pseudosalacia Codd, gen. nov. Bothalia 10: 565-567.
-1973a. Author citation for Putterlickia pyracantha (Celastraceae).
Bothalia 11: 115.
-1973b. The genus Rabdosia in South Africa. Bothalia 11: 117.
-1973c. Plectranthus welwitschii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42:
t. 1646.
-1973d. Orthosiphon pseudoserratus. The Flowering Plants of Africa
42: t. 1657.
-1974a. The identity of Erythrina princeps. Bothalia 11: 269-271.
-1974b. New species of Plectranthus (Labiatae). Bothalia 11:
282-284.
-1974c. Orthosiphon tubiformis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 43: t.
1697.
-1975. Plectranthus (Labiatae) and allied genera in southern Africa.
Bothalia 11: 37 1^442.
-1976a. The South African species of Hemizygia (Lamiaceae).
Bothalia 12: 1-20.
-1976b. The genus Syncolostemon (Labiatae). Bothalia 12: 21-27.
-1977a. The South African species of Teucrium (Lamiaceae). Botluilia
12: 177-179.
-1977b A note on the Stachys aethiopica complex. Bothalia 12:
181-189.
-1977c. Plectranthus xerophilus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44: t.
1728.
— 1 977d. Plectranthus oertendahlii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44:
t. 1729.
-1977e. Grewia lasiocarpa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44: t. 1733.
— 1 977 f . Erythrina abyssinica. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44: t.
1738.
-1978a. A new species of Mundulea (Fabaceae). Bothalia 12: 448, 449
-1978b Brillantasia sublugurica. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44:
t. 1751.
-1979. Plectranthus praetermissus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 45:
t. 1791.
-1980a. Obituary. Robert Harold Compton (1886-1979). Bothalia 13:
244, 245.
-1980b. Plectranthus oribiensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t.
1809.
-1980c. Tinnea barbata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t. 1813.
-1980d. Tinnea rhodesiana. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t. 1814.
-1982a. Notes on the genus Aptosimum (Scrophulariaceae). Bothalia
14: 80, 81.
-1982b. Plectranthus ecklonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t.
1854.
-1982c. Plectranthus emstii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t. 1858.
-1983a. Southern African species of Mentha (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 14:
169-179.
-1983b. The genus Tetradenia Benth. (Lamiaceae). I. African species.
Bothalia 14: 177-183.
-1983c. The correct author citation for Pachypodium succulentum
(Apocynaceae). Bothalia 14: 219.
-1983d. A new name for Hartogia Thunb. ex L.f. (Celastraceae).
Bothalia 14: 219.
-1983e. A new subspecies in Ocimum (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 14: 219,
220.
-1983f. A new species of Corchorus (Tiliaceae). Bothalia 14: 221, 222.
-1983g. Obituary: Jan Erens (1911-1982). Bothalia 14: 303, 304.
-1983h. Polygala fruticosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47: t. 1861 .
-1983i. Macrorungia longistrobus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47:
t. 1862.
-1983j. Monodora junodii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47: t. 1870.
-1983k. Aptosimum procumbens. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47: t.
1880.
-1984a. The genus Tetradenia Benth. (Lamiaceae). II. Malagasy Repu-
blic. Bothalia 15: 1-6.
-1984b. The genus Isodon (Schrad. ex. Benth.) Spach in Africa and a
new genus Rabdosiella Codd (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 15: 7-10.
-1984c. A new species of Plectranthus (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 15: 142,
143.
-1984d. Plectranthus chirindensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48:
t. 1887.
-1984e. Plectranthus tetensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1888.
-1985a. Lamiaceae. Flora of southern A frica 28.
-1985b. Plectranthus coeruleus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1903.
-1985c. Plectranthus hilliardiae. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1904.
-1985d. Plectranthus petiolaris. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1905.
-1985e. Pachypodium lamerei. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1915. '
— 1 985f. Pachypodium baronii var. windsori. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 48: t. 1916.
-1986a. A new species of Stachys (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 16: 51, 52.
-1986b. A new species of Thorncroftia (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 16: 52,
53.
-1986c. Obituary: Cythna Lindenberg Letty (1895-1985). Bothalia 16:
92-96.
-1986d. Notes on Kniphofia (Liliaceae). Bothalia 16: 231, 232.
-1987a. Notes on Kniphofia (Liliaceae). Bothalia 17: 185.
-1987b. Tetradenia nervosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t.
1949.
-1987c. Adenium obesum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1953.
— 1 987d. Pachypodium lealii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1959.
-1988a. Resuscitation of Syncolostemon ramulosus E.Mey. ex Benth.
(Lamiaceae). Bothalia 18: 92, 93.
-1988b. Obituary: Robert Allan Dyer (1900-1987). Bothalia 18: 131-133.
-1989a. Kniphofia pauciflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 50: t.
1995.
-1989b. Hemizygia thorncroftii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 50: t.
2000.
CODD, L.E., ADELAAR, T.F., TERBLANCHE, M„ SM1T, J.D. &
NAUDE, T.W. 1964. A hitherto unknown poisonous plant,
Lasiospermum bipinnatum (Thunb.) Druce. Journal of the South
African Veterinary Medical Association 35: 11-16.
CODD, L.E. & GUNN, M. 1982. The collecting activities of Anton
Rehmann (1840-1917) in South Africa. Bothalia 14: 1-14.
-1985. Additional biographical notes on plant collectors in southern
Africa. Bothalia 15: 631-654.
CODD, L.E., HURTER, L.R., NAUDE, T.W., ADELAAR, T.F. & SMIT,
J.D. 1972. Ingestion of the plant Fadogia monticola Robyns as
an additional cause of gousiekte in ruminants. Onderstepoort
Journal of Veterinary Research 39: 71-82.
CODD, L.E. & KERS, L.E.: Cleome. Flora of southern Africa 13:
119-140.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
115
CODD, L.E. & MYBURGH, S.J. 1949a. Glycine javanica as a soil
conserving legume. Farming in South Africa 24: 471, 472.
CODD, L.E., MYBURGH, S.J. & LOUW, J.G. 1949b. Berseem Clover,
a useful winter fodder plant. Farming in South Africa 24: 422, 450.
CODD, L.E. & PETERKIN, E M. 1933. Rice in British Guiana. Indus-
trial, varietal and cultural studies.
CODD, L.E. & VOORENDYK, S. 1966. Plants which cause ‘gousiek-
te’ poisoning. Bothalia 8, Suppl.: 47-58.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
HUGH COLIN TAYLOR (1925-1999)
Hugh Taylor (Figure 3) was bom in Simon’s Town on
20 January 1925. In his youth he was strongly influenced
by music and the natural environment. His father, Colin
Taylor, was a musician and composer, formerly Music
Master at Eton College, England and later a lecturer at
the University of Cape Town School of Music. A love of
music was passed on to Hugh who learned to play the
piano. Hugh’s mother was a member of the well-known
Miller family after which Miller’s Point was named. The
Taylor family owned the farm ‘Froggy Pond' at Simon’s
Town and a house known as ‘The Shack’ on the Cape
Peninsula west coast in what is now the Cape of Good
Hope section of the Cape Peninsula National Park. Hugh
spent many weekends and holidays horse-riding and
walking in these as yet unspoiled areas. His introduction
to the fynbos and climbing the mountains thus came at an
early age. These early influences set the tone for much of
what was to happen in Hugh’s rich and active life.
Hugh’s mother Doris saw the need for conservation of
the southern Cape Peninsula colloquially known as ‘Cape
Point’ and she actively petitioned the authorities to pro-
claim the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. The incor-
poration of this reserve into the recently proclaimed Cape
Peninsula National Park bears testimony to the value of
far-sighted actions to conserve areas of natural beauty
and, as is well known, great plant species richness.
After matriculating at Rondebosch Boys’ High
School, he studied at the University of Stellenbosch,
where he obtained a B.Sc. (Forestry) degree in 1946.
Hugh then travelled abroad on a ‘world tour' with his
father, who was examining for the Royal Schools of
Music. Hugh fondly remembered this trip with his father
and always enjoyed travelling subsequently. In 1948 he
joined the Department of Forestry and worked first as
Assistant District Forest Officer, stationed at Bredasdorp,
then in 1950-1951 as the District Forest Officer. From
there he moved to Knysna where he was Forest Research
Officer from 1952-1954. He then moved back to Cape
Town in 1955 as District Forest Officer and married
Dulcie Brooke-Smith in 1957. They lived briefly at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch, where Hugh was again
Forest Research Officer. In 1958 they moved to Pieter-
maritzburg where he held the post of Forest Extension
Officer and Lecturer for two years at the University of
Natal and at Cedara College. Their first daughter,
Jennifer was born in Pietermaritzburg in 1959. It was
during this period that Hugh became well acquainted
with the Drakensberg by attending the Mountain Club of
South Africa July camps. In 1960, Hugh resigned from
LETTY, C„ DYER, R.A., VERDOORN, I.C. & CODD, L.E. 1962.
Wild Flowers of the Transvaal. Wild Flowers of the Transvaal
Book Fund.
BERNARD DE WINTER* and G. GERMISHUIZEN**
* 438 Rodericks Road, Lynnwood 0081, Pretoria. Formerly: Director
of Botanical Research Institute, now National Botanical Institute.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
the Department of Forestry to attend the University of
Cape Town where he obtained a B.Sc. (Honours) degree
in Botany in 1961. It was in this year that their second
daughter, Linden, was bom in Heathfield, Cape Town.
The Department of Agriculture then employed Hugh as
fire ecologist at Stellenbosch (1962-1964) before being
appointed to the Botanical Survey Section of the
Botanical Research Institute in 1964. He then became the
Officer in Charge of the Botanical Research Unit, Stel-
lenbosch, in the same year, a post he held continuously
till 1973.
The following excerpt from an article by C. Kavanagh
in the January 14, 1955 edition of The Outspan epito-
mises Hugh’s dedicated approach to Botany: ‘When Mr
Hugh Taylor, formerly of Cape Town, a learned young
Forest Research Officer, took me through the forest
(Knysna) I asked the obvious layman’s question: “Why
don’t you patch with indigenous trees?” It turned out that
this was asking for punishment, which I got. His reply
FIGURE 3— Hugh Colin Taylor (1925-1999). Photo by Adela
Romanowski.
116
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 4. — Hugh Taylor collecting
vegetation data in a demarcat-
ed plot at Cape Point, 1966.
was a running lecture in foresters’ language delivered
during an afternoon of scrambling and slithering on steep
forest paths, or forcing our way through ferns and bram-
bles. We even came disturbingly near the bad-tempered
Knysna elephants, but Mr Taylor lectured on. By sun-
down I felt that I had seen every tree in the forest, but had
merely been taken to a few of the experiments in indige-
nous tree-growing begun by foresters as long as 50 years
ago, and still incomplete.’
Hugh Taylor’s survey methods were strongly influ-
enced by John Acocks, the doyen of vegetation survey in
South Africa whom he met in 1962. He accompanied
Acocks in the field on a number of expeditions through
the fynbos and elsewhere and was always amused by
Acocks’s formal manner. Acocks never failed to address
Hugh simply as ‘Taylor’! Following Acocks’s example
and later using other methods, Hugh conducted many
formal and ad hoc surveys of the vegetation of the south-
western Cape. He developed an extensive knowledge of
the fynbos flora as well as the forest flora of this region.
Hugh’s roots drew him back to the Cape Peninsula,
where his family had been allowed to retain ‘The Shack’
in the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve (The Shack
was demolished in 1968). In the mid-1960’s he initiated
a survey of the vegetation of the reserve. The objective
was to describe the plant communities for which he
obtained an M.Sc. degree from the University of Cape
Town in 1969. This survey formed the basis for a subse-
quent management programme for the vegetation of the
reserve. It was during this time that Hugh’s attention was
drawn to the threat posed by alien invasive plants to the
natural fynbos, both on the Cape Peninsula and else-
where. He campaigned vigorously to bring the scourge
of alien invasive plants to the attention of the public
through a number of popular articles and his involvement
in numerous ‘hack groups’. He spoke often about the
effects of alien vegetation on the fynbos of Red Hill
above Simon’s Town, where his mother and sister lived,
an area he knew intimately.
The methodology used by Hugh Taylor for his Mas-
ters degree was based on Association Analysis. He
applied the method to the data he had collected from 100
samples laid out on a regular grid over an area of 78 km2
in the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve (Figure 4).
Upon completion of this work he travelled to Europe in
1971 where he spent nine months in Germany, studying
under Reinhold Tiixen, a well-known phytosociologist
who lived in Rinteln. Tiixen had in turn studied under the
famous Joseph Braun-Blanquet after whom the now
extensively used tabular method of sorting vegetation
communities was named. While at Rinteln, Hugh and his
wife Dulcie travelled to Montpellier in the south of France
to meet Braun-Blanquet (Figure 5), a rare privilege for a
South African phytosociologist.
The application of the Braun-Blanquet phytosocio-
logical method was a new introduction to South Africa at
about the time Hugh returned from Germany. He collab-
orated with Marinus Werger, a phytosociologist visiting
South Africa from Holland and employed by the Botan-
ical Research Institute, and Fred Kruger of the Depart-
ment of Forestry in a study of the vegetation of Swart-
boskloof, Jonkershoek, near Stellenbosch. The objective
was to test the floristically based method in species-rich
fynbos vegetation. The method proved to be successful
FIGURE 5. — Hugh Taylor with the esteemed J Braun-Blanquet at
Montpellier, France, 1971.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
117
and became favoured as the most suitable one for study-
ing not only fynbos but also for all other vegetation types
in South Africa.
A few years after his return from Germany, Hugh was
transferred to Pretoria for a brief period as Officer in
Charge of the Botanical Survey Section (1974-1975),
returning to his former position at Stellenbosch in 1976.
Hugh was a keen mountaineer and, even when climb-
ing for pleasure he would often stop to consider an inter-
esting plant or indeed do a ‘plot’. Here he would make
copious lists of plant species following the methods
learnt from John Acocks. In the late 1970’s Hugh con-
ducted a study of the Rooiberg near Ladismith in the
southern Cape. This gave him the opportunity to famil-
iarize himself with the somewhat more arid fynbos flora
so different from that found in the moister mountains of
the southwestern Cape. This was to stand Hugh in good
stead when he moved his research focus to the vegetation
of the Cederberg.
Hugh published a total of 70 scientific and popular
articles and papers and was always eager to inform peo-
ple about fynbos, its diversity and conservation. In the
early 1980’s he served on the Steering Committee of the
Fynbos Biome Project. The chapter entitled ‘Capensis’
written for the book Biogeography and ecology of south-
ern Africa edited by M.J.A. Werger (1978) served well
for this project as a benchmark paper for the state of
knowledge of fynbos at that time. Hugh’s meticulous
records and personal knowledge gained over many years
were in constant demand by researchers involved with
the Fynbos Biome Project and he made a significant, if
somewhat undocumented, contribution to the success of
that project.
The Taylors left Stellenbosch in 1983 and moved to
Clanwilliam to allow Hugh to be closer to the Cederberg
which he loved and where he was to survey the vegeta-
tion for the next five years. During his stay in Clan-
william, Hugh would ride up the rough mountain tracks
of the Cederberg in a Land Rover (Figure 6) and when
the tracks ended, would proceed on foot to his selected
mountain survey sites. After toiling in the sun for hours,
he would, after a light lunch, characteristically fill his
pipe, smoke for a while and then have a nap under a
nearby bush, tree or rock that offered a vestige of shade.
Anyone working with Hugh soon became used to this
post-prandial ritual! The half-hour snooze invigorated
Hugh to carry on with his work for the remainder of the
afternoon!
Hugh was always enthusiastic about conservation and
he played an active role in the Cederberg Interest Group,
established under the auspices of the Botanical Society
of South Africa. He participated in the Cedar Restoration
Project and was involved with WWF-SA in securing
property at Matjiesrivier to form the Matjiesrivier Nature
Reserve.
Hugh Taylor’s definitive survey and classification of
the vegetation of the Cederberg published as Cederberg
vegetation and flora , a volume in the Strelitzia series of
the National Botanical Institute is arguably his most
important contribution to understanding the montane
vegetation of the Cape Floristic Region.
In 1990 Hugh and Dulcie retired to Froggy Pond,
Simon’s Town, a new suburb laid out on the farm of the
same name which had belonged to the Taylor family.
They took up residence in Dome’s Drive, a road named
after Hugh’s mother! The circle was complete. But
despite his retirement, Hugh found it hard to ignore his
passion for the fynbos and the mountains. He travelled to
Australia where he climbed in the Grampians in Victoria
and then to New Zealand where he undertook a number
of hiking trails with a long-standing friend. When at
home, Hugh regularly walked on the Cape Peninsula
Mountains and every so often in the Cederberg. His
retirement allowed him more time for activities with the
Botanical Society and Mountain Club of which he had an
unbroken membership of over 50 years. He actively
hacked alien vegetation on Red Hill above Simon’ Town.
Always interested in happenings around him, Hugh
attended summer school courses at the University of
Cape Town in his last years.
Hugh was a member of the following organizations:
Botanical Society of South Africa, Dendrological
Society, Endangered Wildlife Trust, International
Association for Vegetation Science, Mountain Club of
South Africa, South African Association of Botanists,
South African Institute for Ecologists and Environmental
Scientists, South African Institute for Forestry, and the
Wildlife & Environment Society of South Africa.
Hugh collected about 12 000 well-documented plant
specimens. Among these were a number of species new
to botany and in many cases Hugh’s records filled the
FIGURE 6. — Hugh Taylor in the Cederberg, 1983.
118
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
gaps in the distribution of many species. His collections
formed an important part of the Stellenbosch Herbarium
that was amalgamated with the Compton Herbarium,
Kirstenbosch in 1996. Two species, a legume Aspalathus
taylorii R.Dahlgren and a restio Cannomois taylorii
H.P.Linder, commemorate Hugh’s intimate involvement
with the fynbos. His extensive collection of journals,
reprints and original sets of data are housed in the Botany
Department, University of Stellenbosch and his well-
organized collection of colour slides is archived at the
National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch.
Hugh contracted cancer that went undiagnosed for
some time. He bravely fought the disease and looked
forward to a recovery that was not to be. A little over a
month before he took seriously ill, Hugh was up on the
mountain at Red Hill, removing alien plants and walking
amongst the fynbos that he dearly loved. While in hospi-
tal and in pain, with little hope of returning to an active
life, Dulcie, Hugh’s dear and compassionate wife, said to
him that this would be the hardest mountain that he
would ever have to climb, but that when he reached the
top the view would be fantastic! Hugh died on the 6th
July 1999 at Peers Village, Fish Hoek and a memorial
service was held for him at St Francis Church, Simon’s
Town a week after his death.
Hugh Taylor will be fondly remembered by his fami-
ly and many friends and acquaintances for his kind, car-
ing nature and for being a true gentleman. He is survived
by his wife Dulcie, daughters Jenny and Linden,
Linden’s husband Paul and three grandchildren.
PUBLICATIONS BY H.C. TAYLOR
Copies of published papers and of unpublished manuscripts are housed
at the Botany Department, University of Stellenbosch.
BOUCHER, C„ LE ROUX, A. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1986. Strand vege-
tation of the Cape between the Orange and Sunday’s River
mouths. Proceedings of a workshop on the Structure and
Function of Sand Dune Ecosystems, Institute for Coastal
Research, University of Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth: 46, 47.
CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOND, W„ KRUGER, F.J. in
collaboration with BANDS, D.P., BOUCHER, C„ MOLL, E.J.,
TAYLOR, H.C. & VAN WILGEN, B.M. 1981. Structural char-
acterization of vegetation in the Fynbos Biome. South African
National Scientific Programmes Report No. 52.
KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1979. Plant species diversity in Cape
Fynbos: gamma and delta diversity. Vegetatio 41: 85-93.
MACDONALD, I.A.W., CLARK, D.L. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1987. The
alien flora of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. South
African Journal of Botany 53: 398 — 404.
MACDONALD, I.A.W., CLARK, D.L. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1989. The
history and effects of alien plant control in the Cape of Good
Hope Nature Reserve, 1941-1987. South African Journal of
Botany 55: 56-75.
MUSTART, P.J., MOLL, E.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1993. The efficient use
of small plots in a fynbos phytosociological study in the north-
ern Cederberg: a quick way to collect plant-environmental data.
Bothalia 23: 265-269.
QUEZEL, P. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1984. Les fruticees sempervirentes des
regions mediterraneennes de l’ancien monde. Essai compare
d’interpretations des structures biologiques et des donnees his-
toriques. Botanica Helvetica 94: 133-144. (The evergreen
shrublands of the Mediterranean Regions of the Ancient
World— unpublished manuscript translation).
QUEZEL, P. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1985. Problemes poses paries relations
climat — dynamique de la vegetation dans les regions mediter-
ranneennes de l’Ancien Monde, du Cap et de Califomie.
Bulletin Societe botanique de France 131, Actual, bot., 1984
(2/3/4): 235-245. (Problems raised by the relationship between
climate and vegetation dynamics in the Mediterranean Regions
of the Ancient World and California — unpublished manuscript
translation).
TAYLOR, H.C. 1952a. Trees on your farm. I. Shell Digest for farmers
17: 22-25.
-1952b. Trees on your farm. II. Shell Digest for farmers 18: 23-25.
-1953a. Meet the reeds. Shell Digest for farmers 23: 4-6.
-1953b. The Canadian Rockies. Journal of the Mountain Club of South
Africa 56: 42-47.
-1955a. Fynbos and flora composition of Grootvadersbosch. Journal of
the South African Forestry Association 26: 1-14.
-1955b. Forest types and floral composition of Grootvadersbosch.
Journal of the South African Forestry Association 26: 33-46.
-1956. Chimanimani wanderings. Journal of the Mountain Club of
South Africa 59: 39-46.
-1957. Upsetting nature 's balance. Department of Nature Conservation
Report No. 14: 61-63.
-1959. A coastal forest remnant near Stanford, Cape Province. Journal
of the Botanical Society of South Africa 45: 27.
-1961a. Ecological account of a remnant coastal forest near Stanford,
Cape Province. Journal of South African Botany 27: 153-165.
-1961b. The Karkloof Forest: a plea for its protection. Forestry in
South Africa 1: 123-134.
-1962a. Some thoughts on mountain reserves. Cape Department of
Nature Conservation Report No. 19: 31-37.
-1962b. A report on the Nxamalala Forest. Forestiy in South Africa 2:
29-51.
-1 962c. Review: Trees of South Africa. South African Forestry Journal
42: 31, 32.
-1963. A bird’s-eye view of Cape mountain vegetation. Journal of the
Botanical Society of South Africa 59: 17-19.
-1966. A Cycloptychis hunt. Bothalia 8, suppl. 1 : 25, 26.
-1968. Pesplante en natuurbewaring in die Winterreenstreek. Habitat
8: 6-9.
-1969a. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve.
M.Sc. thesis. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch.
-1969b. Pest plants and nature conservation in the winter rainfall
region. Journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa 55:
32-38.
-1969c. Pesplante en natuurbewaring. Bosbou in Suid-Afrika 10: 41-46.
-1972a. Notes on the vegetation of the Cape Flats. Bothalia 10: 637-646.
-1972b. A sketch of the vegetation of South Africa. Veld & Flora 2:
52-55.
-1972c. Fynbos. Veld & Flora 2: 68-75.
-1972d. Hakea. Standard Encyclopaedia of Southern Africa 5: 414—416.
-1972e. Learning about vegetation. Veld & Flora 2: 25-27 .
-1972f. The Otter Trail, Tsitsikamma coast, Cape. Journal of the
Mountain Club of South Africa 75: 59-62.
-1972g. The vegetation of South Africa, with emphasis on the fynbos of
the southwestern Cape. Cape Flora lectures at the University of
Cape Town Summer School. U.C.T. Board of Extra-mural Studies.
-1973. Fire in fynbos. Veld & Flora 3: 18, 19.
-1974. Combat and control of Hakea / Hakea-bestryding. Information
Bulletin of the Fruit & Fruit Technology Research Institute 264:
1-3.
-1975. Weeds in southwestern Cape vegetation. South African Forestiy
Journal 93: 32-36.
-1976. Notes on the vegetation and flora of the Cederberg. Veld &
Flora 62: 28-30. [Reprinted in the Journal of the Mountain
Club of South Africa 79: 95-98 (1976)].
-1977a. Aspects of the ecology of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve
in relation to fire and conservation. In H.A. Mooney & C.E.
Conrad, Proceedings of the Symposium on the Environmental
Consequences of Fire & Fuel Management in Mediterranean
Ecosystems, August 1-5 1977, Palo Alto, California. USDA
Forest Service General Technical Report WO-3: 483^-87.
-1977b. Status and control of exotic plants. Council for the Habitat
conference on mountain environments of South Africa, May,
1976, Johannesburg.
-1977c. The Cape Floral Kingdom: an ecological view. Proceedings of
the Second National Weeds Conference of South Africa: 19-33.
Balkema, Cape Town.
-1978a. Capensis. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of
southern Africa: 172-229. Junk, The Hague.
-1978b. Albizia lopliantha (Willd.) Benth., stinkbean. In C.H. Stirton,
Plant invaders, beautiful but dangerous: 64-67. Department of
Nature Conservation of the Cape Administration, Cape Town.
-1979a. Observations on the flora and phytogeography of Rooiberg, a
dry fynbos mountain in the southern Cape Province, South
Africa. Phytocoenologia 6: 524—531.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
119
-1979b. Phytogeography. In J. Day, W.R. Siegfried, G.N. Louw &
M.L. Jarman, Fynbos ecology, a preliminary synthesis. South
African National Programmes Report No. 40: 70-81.
-1980a. Phytogeography of fynbos. Bothalia 13: 231-235.
-1980b. Weed research and veld conservation. Veld & Flora 66: 85-87.
-1981a. Structural and floristic classifications of Cape Mountain
Fynbos on Rooiberg, southern Cape. Bothalia 13: 557-567.
-1981b. Review: Heathlands and related shmblands: descriptive studies,
edited by R.L. Specht. Bothalia 13: 589, 590.
-1981c. Is fynbos the natural climax vegetation of the south-western
Cape Province of South Africa? In A. Schwabe-Braun, Berichte
der Intemationalen Symposien der Intemationalen Vereinigung
fur Vegetationskunde: Vegetation als anthropo-okoloischer
Gegenstand, Rinteln, 5-8 April 1971, Cramer, Braunschweig:
385-389.
-198 Id. Plant communities along the False Bay coast. In B. Gasson,
The future management of False Bay. 59-67. False Bay Con-
servation Society, Cape Town.
-198 le. Strand plant communities of the southern Cape. (Abstract).
South African Journal of Science 77: 327, 328.
-1983. The vegetation of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve.
Bothalia 14: 779-784.
-1984a. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope Nature
Reserve. I. The use of association-analysis and Braun-Blanquet
methods. Bothalia 15: 245-258.
-1984b. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope Nature
Reserve. II. Descriptive account. Bothalia 15: 259-291.
-1985a. An analysis of the flowering plants and ferns of the Cape of
Good Hope Nature Reserve. South African Journal of Botany
51: 1-13.
-1985b. Hugh Trainor 1914-1985. Obituary. Veld & Flora 71: 45.
-1987. Review: The ecology and management of biological invasions
in southern Africa, edited by I.A.W. Macdonald et al., 1986.
African Wildlife 41: 340.
-1988. Review: The ecology and management of biological invasions
in southern Africa, edited by I.A.W MacDonald et al., 1986.
Bothalia 18: 329, 330.
-1996. Cederberg vegetation and flora. Strelitzia 3. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
TAYLOR, H.C. & BOUCHER, C. 1973. Natural vegetation boundaries
of the southwestern Cape Province (test site B) from ERTS-1
imagery. In O.G. Malan, To assess the value of satellite imagery
in resource evaluation on a national scale. Special Report Fis.
50, Type 3 Report for the period July 1972 to Nov. 1973: 47-57.
CSIR, Pretoria.
TAYLOR, H.C. & BOUCHER, C. 1993. Dry coastal ecosystems of the
South African South Coast. In E. Van der Maarel, Ecosystems of
the World 2B. Dry coastal ecosystems: Africa, America, Asia
and Oceania'. 89-107. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
TAYLOR, H.C. & KRUGER, F.J. 1978. A first attempt to measure tem-
peratures in fire in fynbos. Bothalia 12: 551-553.
TAYLOR, H.C. & MACDONALD, S.A. 1985. Invasive alien woody
plants in the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. I. Results of
a first survey in 1966. South African Journal of Botany 51:
14-20.
TAYLOR, H.C. & MACDONALD, S.A. & MACDONALD, I.A.W.
1985. Invasive alien woody plants in the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve. II. Results of a second survey from 1976 to
1980. South African Journal of Botany 51: 21-29.
TAYLOR, H.C. & MORRIS, J.W. 1981. A brief account of coast veg-
etation near Port Elizabeth. Bothalia 13: 519-525.
TAYLOR, H.C. & VAN DER MEULEN, F. 1981. Structural and floris-
tic classifications of Cape Mountain Fynbos on Rooiberg,
southern Cape. Bothalia 13: 557-567.
TILMAN, D„ BOND, W.J., CAMPBELL, B.M., KRUGER, F.J., LIN-
DER, H P., SCHOLTZ, A., TAYLOR, H.C. & WITTER, M.
1983. Origin and maintenance of plant species diversity. In J.A.
Day, Mineral nutrients in Mediterranean ecosystems. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 71:
125-135.
WERGER, M J.A. KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1972a. A phy-
tosociological study of the Cape fynbos and other vegetation at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
WERGER, M.J.A., KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1972b.
Pflanzensoziologische Studie der Fynbosvegetation am Kap der
Guten Hoffnung. Vegetatio 24: 71-89.
UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPTS OF H.C. TAYLOR
TAYLOR, H.C. Glimpses of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve.
Botanical Research Unit, Stellenbosch.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Cedarberg Nature
Reserve, Algeria. Dated 12 May 1970.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Robberg Nature
Reserve, Algeria. Dated 6 October 1970.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Riversdale Game
Reserve and Riverdale Wild Flower Garden. Dated 6 October
1970.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Marloth Nature
Reserve. Dated 6 October 1970.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Cape of Good
Hope Nature Reserve. Dated 6 October 1970.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Ebb and Flow
Nature Reserve. Dated 6 December 1972.
-International Biological Programme Report on the Bontebok National
Park. Dated 26 October 1972.
-Report on a study tour of western Europe, 4 January to 11 August
1971. Department of Agricultural Technical Services,
cyclostyled report, 43 pp. Dated 1972.
-Report on a study tour to California and Chile, August 1977.
Department of Agricultural Technical Services, cyclostyled
report, 31 pp. Dated 1978.
-Vegetation classification and community pattern. Report produced for
Fynbos Task Group meeting on 2 August 1976.
-What goes on at the Botanical Research Unit, Stellenbosch. Calling
all farmers. Radio interview on 24 August 1981.
TAYLOR, H.C. & EDWARDS, D. A proposed inventory of the con-
servation status of threatened South African plant species.
Dated 1972.
TAYLOR, H.C. & MASSON, P. In prep. Range limits of forest taxa in
the Overberg.
D.J. MCDONALD*, C. BOUCHER**
and E.G.H. OLIVER*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont.
** Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag XI,
7602 Matieland.
BARBARA JOAN JEPPE (1921-1999): BOTANICAL ARTIST EXTRAORDINAIRE
Barbara Joan Jeppe (nee Brereton) passed away on 19
June 1999, following complications after contracting
pneumonia. Although she was diagnosed with lung can-
cer in 1998, her condition improved substantially for
about seven months, enabling her to complete a beauti-
fully illustrated, large-format book on selected species
and cultivars of iris (Jeppe 1999).
Barbara was bom on 21 May 1921 in the small gold
mining town of Pilgrim's Rest in the Mpumalanga Pro-
vince of South Africa where her father was a land survey-
or. At an early age she was introduced to wild flowers, pri-
marily through the efforts of her mother who taught her
how to press them (Anon. 1999; Barron 1999). Her par-
ents, Victor and Gladys Brereton, eventually moved to
Johannesburg in 1928, where she matriculated some years
later from Parktown Girls High School. During these
years her love for nature, particular the flora, grew and
blossomed. Her passion for painting flowers stayed with
her for the rest of her life, even though she married at the
young age of 20 and had a family to tend to. Four children,
Leigh, Marie, Carl and David, all involved in the field of
art, were born from her marriage to psychiatrist, Dr Carl
Jeppe.
120
Some twenty-odd years after her wedding, she illus-
trated her first book, Trees and shrubs of the Witwaters-
rand (Tree Society of southern Africa 1964). This work
established her career as a respected botanical artist and
in the next 10 years it was followed by the books on the
aloes of South Africa (Jeppe 1969) and the wild flowers
of Natal (Jeppe 1975).
It was especially through her book on aloes that
Barbara became well known amongst succulent plant
enthusiasts and the popularity of the book ensured the
production of updated editions in 1974 and 1977. The
aloe books of both Jeppe and Reynolds (1950) were
rapidly sold out and today any of the editions of both
books are valuable Africana, items affordable only by
wealthy collectors. She also produced a little book on
aloes for inclusion in the Pride of South Africa series
(Jeppe 1974), which was available in hard and soft cover
editions and was also translated into Afrikaans.
Barbara was not only good at painting aloes. She pro-
duced numerous beautifully illustrated books on a range
of botanical topics, such as the wild flowers of Natal
which included four striking plates of aloes (Jeppe
1975), and spring and winter flowering bulbs of the Cape
(Jeppe 1989; Pretorius 1989). Even though she preferred
delicately detailed watercolours, she also illustrated a
couple of books on, for instance, acacias (Davidson &
Jeppe 1981) and cycads (Giddy 1984) by using pencil
and pen and ink drawings.
The winter rainfall area of South Africa is home to
one of the richest, most diverse and colourful bulbous
floras in the world. Barbara’s book on Cape bulbs (Jeppe
1989) includes watercolours and descriptions of 420
species, subspecies and varieties from this unique flora.
Many of these bulbous inhabitants have, until Barbara
Jeppe filled the void, been rather poorly known except to
a handful of specialists. Although she had never studied
either botany or art formally, the illustrations and text
show her acute powers of observation, technical correct-
ness and precise attention to detail.
It has been said that Barbara Jeppe’s work is distin-
guished by an exceptional sense of colour. Her amazing
ability to capture the elegance and beauty of plants in
exuberant colours and also reproduce them with scientif-
ic accuracy led to her participating in projects such as
Ciba-Geigy’s (1975) illustrated handbook, Effective weed
control in maize and grain sorghum. The book that con-
tains 32 of her watercolours, today still serves as an
authoritative guide to the identification of weeds com-
monly occurring with these crops in the field (Grabandt
1975). Moreover, it created an enormous demand from
naturalists, agriculturists and horticulturists for a more
comprehensive work. Consequently, Ciba-Geigy (1985)
sponsored another publication, Weeds of crops and gar-
dens in southern Africa, containing 134 full colour repro-
ductions of paintings: 91 by Barbara Jeppe and 43 by
Swiss artists from the Zurich School of Applied Art.
Sadly, Barbara did not live to see the publication of her
iris book by Umdaus Press, Pretoria, which was launched
on 24 August 1999 only some two months after she
passed away. In many respects this was one of her finest
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
FIGURE 7. — Barbara Jeppe with a potted specimen of Strumeria har-
barae Oberm. (Amaryllidaceae), the plant that was named in
her honour.
productions. Barbara did not know much about irises
when she started on the project, but true to her personali-
ty, she set about it with typical enthusiasm. The iris culti-
vars and species were painted with exceptional accuracy
and in large format — the dimensions of the book are 420
x 297 mm portrait — with minute detail paid to the shape
and colour of these striking Eurasian and North American
garden plants. Although they are not indigenous to south-
ern Africa, they are exceptionally versatile as garden sub-
jects and have become so entrenched in local amenity
horticulture that few gardeners give a second thought to
the fact that they hail from foreign shores (Anon. 1982;
Gardiner 1990). Indeed, in the words of Steve Bales, who
wrote the foreword to the iris book (Jeppe 1999: 7),
‘...there certainly must be at least one (iris), ...which will
seduce the indigenous purist to set aside a suitable garden
bed in which these plants may make their home’.
Another project in which she was involved will only
be published posthumously, namely the one on the
Amaryllidaceae of southern Africa. The text of this
grandiose project is being written by Dr Piet Vorster of
the Botany Department of the University of Stellen-
bosch. As with her previous works it is sure to be illus-
trated prolifically with her excellent paintings such as the
Clivia miniata plate reproduced here (Plate 1).
A species of the family Amaryllidaceae, Strumaria
barbarae, was named after her in 1981 (Figure 7). For
her input to botany and horticulture she was awarded two
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
121
PLATE 1. — Clivia miniata (Lindl.) Regel, one of numerous Amaryllidaceae painted by Barbara Jeppe.
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
122
gold medals in 1990, one by the Botanical Society of
South Africa — the Cythna Letty Gold Medal for con-
tributing to botanical illustration in South Africa — and
another by the South African Nurserymen’s Association.
The Transvaal Horticutural Society bestowed on her a
silver medal in 1991.
We mourn the passing of an accomplished botanical
artist who contributed extensively to popularise the mag-
nificent flora of southern Africa.
REFERENCES
ANON. 1982. New irises from America. South African Garden & Home ,
June 1982: 119-121.
ANON. 1999. Barbara Jeppe left her imprint. The Star, June 24, 1999: 13.
BARRON, C. 1999. Artist had an eye for the essence of SA’s flora.
Sunday Tunes , July 18, 1999: 20.
CIBA-GE1GY (PTY) LTD. 1975. Effective weed control in maize and
grain sorghum. Publisher and place of publication unknown.
CIBA-GEIGY (PTY) LTD. 1985. Weeds of crops and gardens in south-
ern Africa. Seal Publishing, Johannesburg.
DAVIDSON, L. & JEPPE, B. 1981. Acacias: afield guide to the iden-
tification of the species of southern Africa. Centaur Publishers,
Johannesburg.
GARDINER, N. 1990. Flowers of the rainbow goddess. South African
Garden & Home, October 1990; 120-122.
GIDDY, C. 1984. Cycads of South Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
GRABANDT, K. 1985. Introduction. In Ciba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd, Weeds
of crops and gardens in southern Africa. Seal Publishing,
Johannesburg.
JEPPE, B. 1969. South African aloes. Purnell, Cape Town.
JEPPE, B. 1974. Pride of South Africa: aloes. Purnell, Cape Town.
JEPPE, B. 1975. Natal wild flowers. Purnell, Cape Town.
JEPPE, B. 1989. Spring and winter flowering bulbs of the Cape. Oxford
University Press, Cape Town.
JEPPE, B. 1999. Irises. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
TREE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN AFRICA. 1964. Trees and shrubs of
the Witwatersrand. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.
PRETORIUS, T. 1989. A joy forever. South African Garden & Home,
December 1989: 128, 129.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1950. Aloes of South Africa. Aloes of South Africa
Book Fund, Johannesburg.
G.F. SMITH* and E M. A. STEYN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
Bothalia 30,1: 123, 124(2000)
Book Reviews
DIE 1NFLORESZENZEN. TYPOLOGIE UND STELLUNG 1M AUF-
BAU DES VEGETATIONSKORPERS. Zweiter Band Teil 2: Monotele
und polytele Synfloreszenzen, by F. WEBERLING. 1998. Gustav Fisch-
er Verlag Jena, Villengang 2, D-07745 Jena, Germany. Pp. 483. Hard
cover: ISBN 3-437-35436-1, price DM 238, OS 1737, SFr 211.
This latest volume now completes the study of the morphology of
the angiosperm inflorescence begun more than 50 years ago by the
great German morphologist Wilhelm Troll and continued by his disci-
ple Focko Weberling. The previous two books in the trilogy are Troll
1964 & 1969, vol. 1 and vol. 2, part 1 respectively.
Numerous excellent line drawings, diagrams and photographs
(totalling 474) encourage the reader not well versed in German to deci-
pher the text. For those students of botany who have missed out on a
German translation course at university, I would suggest starting with
another book by the same author: Weberling 1988, Morphology of
flowers and inflorescences. This is a meticulous translation from the
German by R.J. Pankhurst and has a good glossary. Weberling provides
the basis for the typology of the inflorescence and distinguishes
between the monotelic and polytelic synflorescences (synflorescence: a
system of inflorescences).
This final volume deals with the monotelic synflorescences present
in the families Rubiaceae, Asclepiadaceae, Polemoniaceae, Convol-
vulaceae and Campanulaceae, followed by the polytelic synflorescen-
ces of the Leguminosae, Lamiaceae, Scrophulariaceae and Plantagi-
naceae. There is a taxonomic index to all genera and species covered in
the last two volumes, as well as a general subject index. This should
provide easy access to the serious student and to the systematist having
to describe the great diversity of inflorescences found in a particular
family or even genus.
As a palaeobotanist I was particularly interested in chapter 5, part
4, Zur allgemeinen Phylogenie der Infloreszenzen, i.e. Towards the
general phylogeny of the inflorescences. However, this chapter is
extremely brief (which I found disappointing). In it Weberling refers to
the ideas of Parkins (from 1914) who regarded the flower as originally
borne singly and terminally on a leafy shoot. This is the pattern occur-
ring in many of the Magnoliales and in some of the early angiosperm
flowers from the mid-Cretaceous, e.g. Lesqueria and Archaeanthus.
However, from rocks of the same age, small simple flower types, sim-
ilar to those of some Chloranthaceae and Platanaceae, have also been
found. I suspect that in the long term the answers to the phylogeny of
the flower and inflorescence will come from the fossil record.
Angiosperms, as we now know them, are the end result of over 100
million years of evolution. During that time they evolved into the mind-
boggling diversity of today. While DNA studies may provide clues, it
is the earliest fossil angiosperms that are the key to angiosperm phy-
logeny. So what is needed urgently, is not only more scientists to
describe and understand the present plant diversity which is in serious
decline through habitat destruction, but more palaeobotanists to carry
out extensive collections in an effort to find further early angiosperms
and their progenitors.
The book and its companion volumes provide a valuable tool for
understanding and describing the inflorescences of angiosperms and
constitute essential reference works for all botanical libraries as well as
for many plant taxonomists, morphologists and other botanists.
REFERENCES
(All available from the Mary Gunn Library, NBI, Pretoria)
TROLL, W. 1964. Die Infloreszenzen: typologie und Stellung im
Aufbau des Vegetationskorpers. Erster Band. Gustav Fischer,
Jena, Stuttgart.
TROLL, W. 1969. Die Infloreszenzen: typologie und Stellung im
Aufbau des Vegetationskorpers. Zweiter Band, Teil 1. Gustav
Fischer, Jena, Stuttgart.
WEBERLING, F. 1998. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
HEIDI M. ANDERSON*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
FIELD GUIDE TO THE ACACIAS OF ZIMBABWE, by
JONATHAN TIMBERLAKE, CHRISTOPHER FAGG & RICHARD
BARNES. 1999. Illustrations by Rosemary Wise. CBC Publishing,
P.O. Box 4611, Harare, Zimbabwe. Pp 160. Soft cover: ISBN 0-7974-
1936-5, price GBP 7.50.
Several works on southern African acacias have been published
over the past number of years (Brenan 1970; Ross 1975; Carr 1976;
Ross 1979; Davidson & Jeppe 1981; Steyn 1994; Smit 1999), so one
asks the question, ‘why another one?’ The authors feel that there is a
need for an everyday identification guide to the some 40 species found
in Zimbabwe, more particularly for use by people concerned with land
management, whether agriculturalists, wildlife managers or interested
naturalists. Some of the species covered reflect soil type and land
potential, some are of significant economic value for fuel, browsing,
fencing and other products such as gum, while others have great poten-
tial for improvement of degraded land.
This publication emanated from a research project conducted over
the last decade by Richard Barnes and Christopher Fagg of the Oxford
Forestry Institute, in association with Suzanne Milton. The results of
range-wide studies of the distribution, ecology, taxonomy and variation
of African Acacia species were used to compile two comprehensive
monographs on Acacia karroo and A. erioloba. These studies were
funded by the United Kingdom Department for International
Development for the benefit of developing countries. Jonathan
Timberlake from the Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Bulawayo,
Zimbabwe co-authored this publication with Richard Barnes and
Christopher Fagg.
The cover has a clever fold-out feature: the front cover folds out to
reveal a full colour map of Zimbabwe; the inside back cover contains a
quick identification table of the species described. The introduction
deals with various important subjects such as Taxonomy, Origin and
Distribution, Ecology and Uses. Acacias in vegetation, plant succes-
sion, bush encroachment, rooting habits, nitrogen fixation, animals and
acacias, edible products and medicines, are some of the subjects dis-
cussed.
The following part deals with the description of the different
Acacia species and highlights the various characteristics such as life
form, trunk and bark, young twigs, thoms, leaves, glands, flowers, pods
and seeds. This is followed by a detailed description on ‘how to use this
field guide’. It incorporates four different methods to identify a speci-
men, either by means of the illustrations, distribution maps, descriptive
text or one of the three keys provided.
The dichotomous key is based mainly on vegetative characters and
incorporates pods and flowers only where deemed necessary. It also
helps the identifier to distinguish between Acacia species and similar-
looking non-acacias, such as species of Albizia and Dichrostachys as
well as Australian acacias. The other two keys are different types of
character matrices. In the species matrix on the inside back cover of the
book, any of the readily noted field characters are shown. A solid circle
signifies that the character is nearly always present; an open circle sig-
nifies that the character is only occasionally present. The character
matrix on p. 22 lays out a selection of easily noted vegetative charac-
ters along the top axis and inflorescence and pod characters along the
vertical axis. Any species with that combination of characters is men-
tioned where the column and row intersect.
124
Bothalia 30,1 (2000)
Descriptions of 40 species found in Zimbabwe are provided and
arranged alphabetically. These are concise and to the point, with impor-
tant characters highlighted in bold, based on Zimbabwean specimens
and field notes. The common names for each species are also given in
languages used in Zimbabwe. The major field characters are listed after
the main description. This is followed by details on characters differ-
entiating the species from others with which it might be confused. For
each species a distribution map is provided, with distributional notes
compiled from herbarium specimens available from numerous herbaria
throughout Zimbabwe, the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, Forest
Herbarium at Oxford and the National Herbarium in Pretoria, as well
as ecological notes primarily derived from the authors’ own field obser-
vations. The final section under each description includes notes on the
general biology, the nomenclature of the species and its various eco-
nomic uses gained from local literature and local observations.
Illustrations are provided in the form of Rosemary Wise’s excellent
line drawings of the habit, thorns, leaves, leaflets, glands, inflores-
cences, fruit and seeds. These illustrations are so accurate that it is often
not necessary to refer to the accompanying descriptive text to identify
an Acacia species. The height of the trees can readily be gauged by
comparison with drawings of all kinds of human or animal figures
under the tree or even by a parked vehicle, rendering a humouristic
touch to the illustrations. Furthermore, the illustrations and maps are
conveniently placed near the relevant text.
Included in the latter part of the book are illustrations of pods from
all indigenous acacias, grouped under spicate and globose flowered
species. There is also a list of species found in various geographical
regions and vegetation types in the country, as well as a glossary of
botanical terms used, some of which are illustrated, a list of common
names, a comprehensive bibliography of sources of information used in
the preparation of the book and finally an index of all scientific names.
I can recommend this guide without hesitation to acacia enthusiasts
throughout southern Africa, particularly since it covers an area con-
taining species not found elsewhere. An added bonus is its light weight
and A5 size, facilitating easy handling in the field.
REFERENCES
BRENAN, J.P.M. 1970. Acacia. Flora zambesiaca 3,1: 53-113.
CARR, J.D. 1976. The South African acacias. Conservation Press,
Johannesburg, London, Manzini.
DAVIDSON, L. & JEPPE, B. 1981 . Acacias — afield guide to the iden-
tification of the species of southern Africa, edn 1. Centaur
Publisher, Johannesburg.
ROSS, J.H. 1975. Acacia. Flora of southern Africa 16,1: 24-1 14.
ROSS, J.H. 1979. A conspectus of the African Acacia species. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 44.
SM1T, N. 1999. Guide to the acacias of South Africa. Briza, Arcadia.
STEYN, M. 1994. S.A. acacias — identification guide. Private publica-
tion.
G. GERMISHUIZEN*
*National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
AQUATIC AND WETLAND PLANTS OF INDIA by C.D.K. COOK,
1996. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Pp. 385, A4. Hard cover:
ISBN 0198548214, price approx. R1 200,00 (stocks limited).
This flora of wetland plants in India is the third book written by
Prof. C.D.K. Cook on aquatic plants. Water plants of the world (Cook
et al. 1974) and Aquatic plant book (Cook 1990) contain keys to all the
genera of aquatic plants throughout the world. Even though most of the
species in this book differ from those on the African continent, it is still
a very useful reference book for any one doing research on aquatic
plants in southern Africa.
The author has taken into consideration that the users of the book
may not all be experts and consequently described the plants in simple
terms, in many instances using descriptions of other objects to explain
the structure. For example, the hairs occurring on the adaxial surface of
the leaves of Salvinia molesta were described as looking like an egg
beater and when observed under the microscope, the description is seen
to be very apt. The keys are very user friendly and when using them it
soon becomes clear that they have been compiled by someone very
knowledgeable who can also stress their diagnostic characters. The 374
excellent illustrations, which were all done by the author, conveniently
occur on the same page as the descriptions, thus eliminating the neces-
sity of having to page to and fro. In addition, the clear, concise dia-
grams enhance the descriptions as well as facilitate comparison of dif-
ferent species. Moreover, in many instances it can be used as a glossary
to describe terms used in other publications. There are 67 families with
1 87 genera and 685 species dealt with in this book, of which 62 species
occur in both South Africa and India. The description is followed by
reference to a current publication, the habitat of the plant, distribution
in India and elsewhere in the world and some interesting general infor-
mation. There is a map of the Indian subcontinent showing the area
covered in this book. The distributions within India are represented by
symbols in respect of each province. This, however, I find somewhat
irritating having to continuously refer to the map in the front of the
book to ascertain where the plant occurs. A small map showing the dis-
tribution of each species, or at least the more common ones would have
been preferable. However, considering the time it would have taken to
compile these maps, it would not have been possible to produce such a
document in the time available. Even though genera such as
Largarosiphon and Hydrostachys, which only occur in Africa and
Madagascar, as well as some of the genera in the family Podo-
stemaceae, and Prionium which is endemic to the southern part of
Africa, are of course not mentioned in this book, it is still highly re-
commended to anyone doing research on this group of plants in south-
ern Africa.
In his review of this book, Donald H. Les said: ‘So, those are my
criticisms which one can clearly see are relatively minor. None of them
detract in the least from this otherwise outstanding taxonomic coverage
of Indian aquatics which will undoubtedly become another classic in
water plant literature. Christopher Cook is good at writing such classics
and we only hope that now that he has the flora ‘bug’, he will continue
to use his extraordinary abilities to make taxonomic sense of water
plants from other regions. Hmmm. I don’t think that Africa has a com-
prehensive aquatic flora yet.’
Prof. Cook indicated in his Preface that this book would be his final
contribution before going into retirement. He briefly visited South
Africa towards the end of last year. A few of us, namely Roddy Ward,
Mike Coke, and myself, were fortunate enough to show Prof. Cook
some of the aquatic plants that occur in KwaZulu-Natal. Fortunately
the ‘flora bug’ has bitten this renowned aquatic botanist once more, and
the Aquatic and wetland plants of India will certainly not be his ‘last
fling’. Currently Prof. Cook and the National Botanical Institute are
involved in a joint project on the southern African aquatic flora.
Due to the ruling rate of exchange here in South Africa, the publi-
cation is fairly expensive for a book on flora not directly related to our
country. Nevertheless, this book is far more than just a study on a flora
of a specific country and I certainly recommend its use as a well-illus-
trated reference book on aquatic and wetland plants.
REFERENCES
COOK, C.D.K. 1990. Aquatic plant book. SPB Academic Publishing,
The Hague.
COOK, C.D.K., GUT, B.J., RIX, E.M., SCHNELLER, J. & SEITZ, M.
1974. Water plants of the world. Junk, The Hague.
LES, D.H. 1997. Review: Aquatic and wetland plants of India, by
C.D.K. Cook. Aquatic Botany 59: 173-175.
R.H. GLEN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R1 60,00 Other countries US$50.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R310,00 Other countries US$95.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 • Fax. (012) 804-3211 • email: bookshop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za
BOTHALIA
Volume 30,1 May 2000
CONTENTS
New genus, species and combinations in Bothalia 30,1 (2000) iv
1. Notes on the genus Frithia (Mesembryanthemaceae) and the description of a new species, F. humilis,
in South Africa. P.M. BURGOYNE, G.F. SMITH and F. DU PLESSIS 1
2. A review of generic concepts in the Stilbaceae. J.P ROURKE 9
3. Studies in the Sphaerocarpales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Sphaerocarpos and its
only local species, S. stipitatus. S.M. PEROLD 17
4. FSA contributions 15: Piperaceae. K.L. IMMELMAN 25
5. FSA contributions 16: Sphenocleaceae. W.G. WELMAN 31
6. Taxonomic studies in the Aizoaceae from South Africa: three new species and some new combina-
tions. C. KLAK 35
7. Notes on African plants:
Agavaceae. Agave vivipara : a naturalised alien in southern Africa. E.M.A. STEYN and
G.F. SMITH 43
Asphodelaceae: Alooideae. The genus Poellnitzia included in Astroloba. J.C. MANNING and
G.F. SMITH 53
Asphodelaceae: Alooideae. Aloe delphinensis in Aloe sect. Lomatophyllum. PI. FORSTER ... 53
Ericaceae. Two new species of Erica from Western Cape, South Africa. E.G.H. OLIVER and
I.M. OLIVER 49
Hyacinthaceae. Correction of a historical error in the taxonomic description of Urginea ciliata.
A.P DOLD and R. MOBERG 46
8. Morphology and anatomy of the rhizome and frond in the African species of Polystichum (Pteropsida:
Dryopteridaceae). J.P. ROUX and A.E. VAN WYK 57
9. The epidermis in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic significance.
C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 69
10. Vegetation of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands south of George, South Africa. D.B. HOARE,
J.E. VICTOR, R.A. LUBKE and L. MUCINA 87
1 1 . Checklist of plant species of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands, south of George, South Africa.
J.E. VICTOR, D.B. HOARE and R.A. LUBKE 97
12. Miscellaneous notes:
Hyacinthaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 13. Lachenalia mutabilis, L. pustulata and
L. unicolor. J.J. SPIES, J.L. DU PREEZ, A. MINNAAR and R. KLEYNHANS 106
Poaceae. Apomictic embryo sac development in Cenchrus ciliaris (Panicoideae). N.C. VISSER,
J.J. SPIES and H.J.T. VENTER 103
13. Obituaries:
Leslie Edward Wostall Codd (1908-1999). B. DE WINTER and G. GERMISHUIZEN Ill
Hugh Colin Taylor (1925-1999). D.J. MCDONALD, C. BOUCHER and E.G.H. OLIVER ... 115
Barbara Joan Jeppe (1921-1999): botanical artist extraordinaire. G.F SMITH and E.M.A.
STEYN 119
14. Book reviews 123
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Abstracts/RRM • CABS • CABACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Current Contents, Scisearch, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: reviews and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Tel. (012) 804-3200. Fax (012)
804-321 1 . email: bookshop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za website: www.nbi.ac.za/pubs. Typesetting and page layout: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction & printing:
Afriscot Litho (Pty) Ltd, trading as Afriscot Printers, P.O. Box 75353, Lynnwood Ridge, 0040 Pretoria. Tel (012) 349-2800/1. Fax (012) 349-2802.