ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia
Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 31,2
Oct. 2001
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001, Republic of
South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of
the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is
devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Three booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20, (b) to Vols 21-25 and (c) to Vols 26-30, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many botanical artists have contributed to
the series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian Condy, Betty Connell, Stella
Gower, Rosemary Holcroft, Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire Linder-
Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased to receive living plants of general interest
or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1^9 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia
and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the informa-
tion is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidiiun, 1983, by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidiiun), 1989, by J.M.
& H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megalloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. &
H.M. Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Mai'keting, Box 317, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stemming the Sixth Extinction, 1999,
by J.M. Anderson (ed.)
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 31,2
Scientific Editor: G. Germishuizen
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
i5§OTANICAL
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
October 2001
Editorial Board
D.F, Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBl, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Archer, Mrs C. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Balkwill, Prof. K. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, RSA.
Beyers, Dr J.B.P. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Braggins, Dr J. Auckland, New Zealand.
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Bremer, Prof. K. University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Brown, Dr E. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia.
Brownsey, Dr P.J. Herbarium, National Museum, Wellington, New Zealand.
Cutler, Dr D.F. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
De Paiva, Dr J.A.R. University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Farjon, Dr A. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Furuki, Dr T. Natural History Museum & Institute, Chiba, Japan.
Geerinck, Dr D. National Botanical Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Henderson, Ms F. Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, RSA.
Hill, Dr K.D. National Herbarium of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jordaan, Ms M. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Jovet-Ast, Dr S. Biarritz, France.
Kativu, S. National Herbarium, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Leistner, Dr O.A. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Manning, Dr J.C. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Moll, Prof. E.J. SAWC, Hoedspruit, RSA.
Nelson, Dr E.C. Outwell, Wisbech, UK.
Nevling, Dr L.I. Illinois Natural History Survey, USA.
Newton, Prof. F.E. Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nordenstam, Prof. R.B. Natural History Museum, Stockholm, Sweden.
Parris, Dr B. Fern Research Foundation, Bay of Islands, New Zealand.
Patterson-Jones, Dr D. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Poes, Prof. T. Eszterhazy College, Eger, Hungary.
Retief, Ms E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Rourke, Dr J.P. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Roux, Dr J.P. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
Schrire, Dr B. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Schutte-Vlok, Ms A. Oudtshoorn, RSA.
Weberling, Prof. Dr F. University of Ulm, Germany.
Welman, Ms W.G. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
CONTENTS
Volume 31,2
1. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 25. A new species in subgenus Ric-
ciella, section Ricciella. S.M. PEROLD 151
2. Five new species of Erica (Ericaceae) from the Swartberg Range, Western Cape, South Africa
and a note on E. esterhuyseniae. E.G.H. OLIVER and I.M. OLIVER 155
3. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1. The genus Aneura
and its local representative. S.M. PEROLD 167
4. Three new species of Tritoniopsis (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) from the Cape Region of South Africa J.C.
MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 175
5. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Riccardia
and its type species. R. multifida. with confirmation of its presence in the region. S.M. PEROLD 183
6. Notes on African plants;
Acanthaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Lamiaceae. New records and distributional disjunctions from South
Africa, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. T.J. EDWARDS, A.J. BEAUMONT and D. STYLES 199
Colchicaceae. A remarkable new species of Androcymhium from Northern Cape. South Africa.
J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 203
Dennstaedtiaceae-Pteropsida. Hypolepis villoso-viscida new to the Flora of southern Africa. J.P.
ROUX 195
Eabaceae. The identity of Melolohium lampolobiim (Papilionoideae) A. MOTEETEE and B-E.
VANWYK 209
Gentianaceae. A new' species of Sebaea from the Swartberg Range, Western Cape. South Africa.
I.M. OLIVER and J.B.P. BEYERS 207
Hyacinthaceae. The generic delimitation within Hyacinthaceae, a comment on works by E. Speta.
B. STEDJE 192
Iridaceae. Two new renosterveld species of Crocoideae from South Africa. J.C. MANNING and
P. GOLDBLATT 189
Portulacaceae. Talinum panicidatum. a naturalized weed in South Africa. E.M.A. STEYN and
G.F. SMITH 195
Pteridophyta. New distribution records of southern African Pteridophyta. J.E. BURROWS and
S.M. BURROWS 205
Zamiaceae. Encephalartos relictiis: a new species from southern Africa. P.J.H. HURTER and H.F.
GLEN 197
7. Taxonomic significance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in Passerina (Thymelaea-
ceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 213
8. Miscellaneous notes;
Aloaceae. Are ovules and seeds in Lomatophyllum Willd. (Aloe sect. Lomatophyllum sensu auct.)
anatropous and exarillate? E.M.A. STEYN and G.F. SMITH 237
9. Obituary; Heinrich Johann Wilhelm Giess ( 1910-2000). HERTA KOLBERG 241
10. Book review 245
11. National Botanical Institute South Africa; administration and research staff, 31 March 2001, publications
1 April 2000-31 March 2001. Compiler; B.A. Momberg 247
12. Guide for authors to Bothalia 265
New species, subspecies and combinations in Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
Androcymbium asteroides J.C. Manning & Goldhlatt, sp. nov., 203
Encephalartos rdictus P.J.H.Hnrter, sp. nov., 197
Erica blaerioides E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 163
Erica blaerioides subsp. hirsuta E.G.H.Oliv., subsp. nov., 165
Erica chionodes E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 161
Erica dolflana E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 155
Erica oreotragus E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 160
Erica taylorii E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., 157
Freesia fucata J.C. Manning & Goldhlatt, sp. nov., 189
Ixia atrandra Goldhlatt & J.C. Manning, sp. nov., 191
Melolobium lampolobum (E.Mey.) A.Moteetee & B-E.van Wyk, comb, nov., 210
Riccia sibayenii Perold, sp. nov., 151
Sebaea amicorum I.M.Oliv. <&. Beyers, sp. nov., 207
Tritoniopsis hicoXor J.C. Manning & Goldhlatt, sp. nov., 175
Tritoniopsis flava J.C. Manning & Goldhlatt, sp. nov., 178
Tritoniopsis toximontana J.C. Manning & Goldhlatt, sp. nov., 178
Bothalia31,2: 151-154(2001)
Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 25.
A new species in subgenus Ricciella, section Ricciella
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Marchantiales, Riccia sibayenii Perold, section Ricciella (A.Br.) Bisch., subgenus Ricciella, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Riccia sibayenii Perold is a new species, recently collected in Mpumalanga, near Sibayeni and has been named for this
town, which is close to the Mozambique border and is in the summer rainfall area. R. sibayenii is distinguished by lime-
green, medium-sized to quite large thalli with a chlorophyllose dorsal epidermis, air pores that soon enlarge and lead into
mostly 6-sided air chambers below; ventrally with a thin median layer of storage tissue; ventral scales absent and the
rhizoids all smooth. The spores are winged and polar, the distal face completely or incompletely reticulate and the proxi-
mal face ornamented with fine to coarse, sometimes spinose granules.
Riccia sibayenii Perold, sp. nov.
Thalli (iioici, annui, subdense turbati. rosulas non for-
mantes, prasini sine ullo colore purpureo, ramis usque ad
16 vel 17 mm longis, 1.05-3.75 mm lads, oblongis vel
apicem versus angustatis. Cavemulae supra ports apert-
entes, apicem versus parvis, proximaliter maiortbus, aetate
disintegrantes; tela penarta solum in parte media cartnata,
4—6 cellulas profunda. Squamae ventrales absentes, rhi-
zoideae omnes glabrae. Capsidae exsertae, ventraliter ape-
rientes. Sporae 77.5-100.0 pm diametro. trtangulart-glo-
bosae, atrobrunneae, alls cum duabus sertebus granularum
secus marginem, anisopolares, superficie distali cum alve-
olis completis vel incompletis, cristis cum duabus sertebus
granularum grossarum asperatis; superficie proximali cum
nota triradiata prominenti, in quaque superficula cum
granulis tenuibus vel grossis dispersis omata. Numerus
chromosomatum ignotus.
TYPE. — Mpumalanga, 2531 (Komatipoort): ± 10 km
south of Komatipoort, between the Kaftan fence and
Komati River, near Sibayeni town, altitude 270 m, on
black loamy soil, (-DB ), 2000-07- 1 2, Jean J. Meyer 2875
(PRE, holo.). Figure 1.
Thalliis medium-sized to fairly large, annual, quite
densely massed in patches, not forming rosettes, some-
times with branches overlying, occasionally covering old
thalli from previous season, usually closely adherent to
substrate, lime-green, without any purple coloration;
branches never simple, mostly twice to several times fur-
cate (Figure 2A), total length up to 16-17 mm long, seg-
ments narrowly to moderately divergent, 3-7 x
1.05-3.75 mm, 700-1250 pm thick medianly, thinner
toward winged margins, in section 1.5-3 times wider
than thick; oblong to tapering toward apex, shortly once
or twice emarginate, flat to slightly concave above, not
medianly grooved, margins winged, blunt, rather irregu-
larly scalloped, flanks sloping obliquely, ventral face
rounded and keeled, giving rise to perennating stolons.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XIOI, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-03-02.
scales absent; when dry, margins sometimes slightly
raised, not inflexed.
Dorsal epidermis (Figures 2B; 3B) covering air cham-
bers flat, delicate and translucent, cells unistratose, 4—6-
sided, 50-80 x 42.5-67.5 pm; air pores distally small
(Figure 3A), soon enlarging to 80-125 x 50-75 pm or
more in older parts, irregular in shape, bordering cells not
differentiated (Figure 3C), breaking down with age and
air chambers below becoming exposed. Assimilation tis-
sue up to 875 pm thick, occupying most of thickness of
thallus, air chambers 12-14 across width of thallus, from
above mostly penta- or hexagonal, but in cross section
polygonal and variable in size, the enclosing chlorophyl-
lose, unistratose walls with cells 80.0-87.5 x 75-100 pm,
vertically to obliquely arranged, here and there intersect-
ing, air chambers then in 2 or 3 layers, except at margins,
where only 1 layer deep; storage tissue confined to medi-
an keeled part, 4—6 cell layers or 200-250 pm thick, cells
dorsiventrally flattened, 50.5-62.5 x 77.5-102.5 pm,
sometimes with smaller cells wedged in between. Ventral
scales absent. Rhizoids all smooth, 15-35 pm wide.
Dioicous. Antheridia serially arranged in 2 or 3 rows
(Figure 3D) and submerged along middle of thallus
FIGURE 1. — Locality of Riccia sibayenii in southern Africa.
152
Bothalia 31.2 (2001 )
FIGURE 2. — Riccia sihayenii. A, plant with several branches; B, epi-
dermal cells and air pore (hatched) overlying one air chamber,
the other partly exposed, as seen from above; C, c/s male
branch through air chambers and antheridial cavity; D, c/s near
apex of female branch with air chambers and capsule; E, c/s
nearer to base of female branch with air chambers and capsule.
A-E, ./../. Meyer 2H75. Scale bars: A, 2 mm; B, 50 pm; C-E, I
mm.
(Figure 2C), cavities 330-350 x 310-410 jam, necks aris-
ing above from small hollows and projecting up to 230
pm above thallus. Archegonia arranged in a row along
middle of segments, sometimes obliquely orientated,
necks ± 160 pm long (Figure 3F), dark red. Capsules
protruding and opening ventrally (Figure 2D, E), up to 6
in an acropetal row along branch, 450-575 pm diam.,
hardly visible from above (Figure 3E), containing up to
± 350 spores each, those in the youngest capsule near
apex sometimes still immature. Spores 77.5-100.0 pm
diam., triangular-globular, anisopolar, dark brown, semi-
transparent to opaque; wing ± 7.5 pm wide, at marginal
angles width ± 10 pm and perforated by single large pore
(Figure 4D), margin finely crenulate with 2 rows of gran-
ules, one along edge and the other immediately inward;
ornamentation on the 2 faces quite different; distal face
(Figure 4A-D) completely to incompletely reticulate:
with up to 5 ± complete alveoli, 12.5-17.5 x 12.5-22.5
pm, across distal face and totalling ±15, otherwise with
3 or 4 larger, central alveoli, ± 25 x 17.5 pm, surrounded
by smaller ones that may be confluent or separated,
ridges ± 5 pm high, thick and roughened by 2 rows of
granules, coarser than marginal ones, not raised at nodes
and not extending across wing; proximal face (Figure
4E, F) with prominent triradiate mark ± 2.5 pm high, all
or some arms extending across wing, each facet orna-
mented with scattered, fine to coarse granules, some single
and spinose, others joined together. Chromosome num-
ber. unknown, as material no longer living.
Thallus sections from the dry plants that were soaked
up, proved quite difficult to prepare. Hopefully, living
plants will still come to hand in the future. So far, the
species has only been collected once (Figure 1). It grows
on black, loamy soil (pH7) derived from weathered
basalt of the Letaba Formation (Lebombo group) of the
Karroo Sequence (Visser et al. 1984), in full sun on a
gentle slope in a valley that becomes waterlogged during
the summer months, when most of the rain falls. The
vegetation type of vascular plants in the area is Lebombo
Arid Mountain Bushveld (Low & Rebelo 1996).
The locality is described as disturbed. As it is close to
the Mozambique border, there has been an influx of peo-
ple fleeing from the war and its aftermath. It is possible
that the recent floods in the wake of cyclones Hudah and
Eline, may have spread the spores of this species further
southward, as it must be more widespread than this sin-
gle, though quite copious collection suggests. The area
is, however, very undercollected as far as bryophytes are
concerned, in fact, none have previously been recorded
for the quarter degree grid 253 IDB.
Although related to R. rubricollis, which was collect-
ed by Duthie in 1929 at Knysna, this new species differs
from it by being more delicate and by totally lacking any
purple colouration due to anthocyanin pigmentation on
the dorsal surface of the thallus, as well as in the
antheridial necks. Furthermore, the spores of/?, sibayenii
have double rows of granules along the wing margins
and on the alveolar walls on the distal face. The proximal
face is ornamented with spinose granules and not with
smooth-walled alveoli, which are present in R. rubricol-
lis on both faces (Perold 1991). In addition, R. sibayenii
grows in the subtropics, which has summer rain, not in
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
153
FIGURE 3. — Riccia sibayenii. A. distal branches of thallus with air pores gradually increasing in size more proximally; B. pores and dorsal epi-
dermal cells; C. single pore and surrounding dorsal cells; D. 2 or 3 rows of antheridia near apex of male branch; E. toward apex of female
branch with capsule only faintly visible from above; F, protruding archegonial neck (no longer erect). A-F, J.J. Meyer 2875. A, x 8.3; B,
X 58; C. X 202; D. X 20; E, X 18.4; F, X 133.
FIGURE 4. — Riccia sibayenii. Spores. A-C. distal face; C, side view; D, part of distal face, wing margin and pore; E, proximal face with triradi-
ate mark; F, side view of proximal face. A-F. J.J. Meyer 2875. A. x 418; B, x 500; C, x 514; D. x 661; E, x 403.7; F, x 399.
the temperate southern Cape, known for its fynbos and
rain almost all year round.
Because its sporangia protrude and open ventrally, R.
sibayenii is referred to subgenus Ricciella (A.Br.) Bisch.,
section Ricciella, together with R. stricta and R. piirpuras-
cens. R. nibricollis was referred to subgenus Ricciella,
section Spongodes, because the sporangia are deeply em-
bedded in the thallus and open dorsally (Perold 1995).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 wish to sincerely thank Dr S. Jovet-Ast for kindly ref-
ereeing this paper, as well as my colleague, Mr J.J. Meyer,
154
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
for collecting this new species. Dr H.F. Glen is thanked for
translating the diagnosis into Latin. I also extend my grati-
tude to Ms G. Condy for the drawings, to Mrs A.
Romanowski for developing and printing the photographs,
and to Ms D. Maree for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
LOW. A.B. & REBELO, A.G. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs
& Tourism, Pretoria.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 22. R. nihricollis, now validated, typified and
described. Bothalia 21: 51-54.
PEROLD, S.M. 1995. The taxonomic history of the Ricciaceae
(1937-1995) and a classification of sub-Saharan Ricciae.
Bothalia 25: 211-231.
VISSER, D.J.L. et al. 1984. Geological map of the Republics of South
Africa, Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ciskei and the
Kingdoms of Lesotho and Swaziland. The Government Printer,
Pretoria.
Bothalia 31.2: 155-165 (2001)
Five new species of Erica (Ericaceae) from the Swartberg Range,
Western Cape, South Africa and a note on E, esterhuyseniae
E.G.H. OLIVER* and I.M. OLIVER*
Keywords: Erica L., taxonomy, new species. South Africa, Swartberg, Western Cape
ABSTRACT
Descriptions are provided of five new species of Erica L, from the Klein and Groot Swartberg Mountains in Western Cape,
South Africa. The two known populations off. dolfiana E.G.H.Oliv. are confined to the stony, southern slopes of two well-
separated areas. E. taylorii E.G.H.Oliv. is also known from two well-separated populations on the Swartberg but with the
others in the Cederberg. The other three new species are allied to E. esterhuyseniae Compton: E. chionodes E.G.H.Oliv.,
with brilliant white flowers, occurs only in seepage zones in two well-separated areas, E. oreotragus E.G.H.Oliv. (syn. E.
esterhuyseniae Compton var. trimera Compton) with pale pink to white flowers and E. blaerioides E.G.H.Oliv. with white
flowers, are widespread in the central and western Swartberg Range.
I. Erica dolfiana E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., in genere
affmitate dubia, sed foliis quadrinatis petiolo longo
bractea bracteolisque comparate longis plus minusve
sepala aequantibus sed remotis, corolla urceolata glabra
alba parva, antheris glabris calcaribus longis tenuibus fil-
amentis tenuibus, stigmate subpeltata ad peltata semi-
nibus vulgo ericoideis reticulatis dignoscenda. Eigura 1 .
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3322 (Oudtshoom); Oudts-
hoom, Groot Swartberg, peak just north of Tierberg,
2 010 m, (-AD), 17 October 2000, E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver
11688 (NBG, holo.; BM, BOL, K. MO, NY, P, PRE, S).
Erect, compact shrub up to 300(-500) mm tall, single-
stemmed reseeder. Branches', main branches up to 50 mm
long, erect, with numerous secondary branches 2-5 mm
long on every node towards apex and a few sometimes
distally, all ending in an inflorescence; all branches with
short, spreading to reflexed hairs with or without a few
stouter, longer gland-tipped hairs admixed. Leaves 4-nate,
subspreading, imbricate, ovate to elliptic, 2. 0-3. 3 x
1.0-1. 3 mm, adaxially flattened and abaxially rounded
with acute margins, sparsely puberulous with a few long,
stouter gland-tipped hairs interspersed abaxially, ciliate
with a few long, gland-tipped hairs, sulcus narrow and
open at base; petiole ± 1.3 mm long, puberulous.
Inflorescence: flowers 4-nate in 1 whorl at apex of main
and secondary branches, these packed in terminal, capi-
tate or longer spike-like synflorescences; pedicel ± 2.2
mm long, loosely puberulous, white to pale green, some-
times tinged red; bract partially recaulescent from basal to
middle position, oblong, ± 1 .4 x 0.4 mm, with very short
subapical sulcus, white and slightly hyaline, sometimes
with pale green tip, sparsely puberulous in upper 'U-fi,
margins with gland-tipped hairs and one apically, glands
white or pink; bracteoles 2, median to just below calyx in
position, otherwise like bract. Calyx 4-lobed, fused ± Vg
at base; lobes adpressed to corolla, oblong, ± 2.0 x 0.5
mm. subacute, sulcus in upper half, short and narrow.
* Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont. Cape Town.
MS. received: 2(301-04-02.
white to pale green or reddish, more so at apex, puberu-
lous in upper 'A-'A, margins with short gland-tipped
hairs, glands red. Corolla 4-lobed, campanulate to slight-
ly urceolate, ± 3.4 x 2.2 mm, glabrous, white or tinged
pink; lobes ± 0.7 x 1.3 mm, rounded to emarginate, mar-
gins entire to slightly erose. Stamens 8, included, free; fil-
aments narrowly linear, ± 1.8 mm long, with slight apical
S-bend, glabrous, white; anthers bipartite, oblong in
adaxial view, dorsally attached near base, appendiculate;
thecae erect adpressed, ovate to elliptic in lateral view, ±
0.9 X 0.5 mm, smooth dark brown, spurs narrowly lance-
olate, ± 0.6 mm long, with 2 or 3 teeth, white, pore ± 'A
length of theca; pollen in tetrads. Ovary 4-locular, broad-
ly obovoid-ellipsoid, ±1x1 mm, emarginate, puberu-
lous, green, with small dark-green nectaries around base;
ovules 9-15 per locule, laterally spreading; style ± 2.7
mm long, exserted, pale greenish red, glabrous; stigma
subpeltate to peltate, dark red. Emit a dehiscent capsule,
± 1.1 X 1.5 mm, valves splitting for V4 their length and to
± 45° angle, septa equally divided on columella and
valves. Seeds ellipsoid, ± 0.4 x 0.25 mm, slightly alveo-
late, orange, testa cells 60-75 x 25-30 pm, anticlinal
walls jigsawed, inner periclinal walls pitted. Elowering
time: October to early December. Figure 1 .
Erica dolfiana is characterized by 4-nate leaves with
relatively long petioles, relatively large bract and bracte-
oles about the size of the sepals, but remote from them,
sepals white with long-stalked red marginal glands, urce-
olate glabrous white corolla, which is relatively small for
the genus, glabrous anthers with long narrow appendages
and thin filaments, enlarged subpeltate to peltate stigma,
and the standard reticulate/alveolate ericoid-type seed.
E. dolfiana shows no close affinity to any other species.
It may, however, be related to E. lignosa H.A. Baker, a
widespread Swartberg species, and to E. jugicola
E.G.H.Oliv. ined., a more restricted new species. Both have
similar long-stalked red glands on the bract, bracteoles and
sepals, but both have larger, pink flowers (very much larg-
er in the latter) which are mostly finely hairy. They also
have larger anther appendages and a small simple stigma.
All three species are sympatric on the Blesberg.
156
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
FIGURE I. — Erica dolfiana. A, flowering branch, natural size; B, stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, flower; E, bract; F, bracteole; G, sepal;
H, flower opened laterally to show androecium and gynoecium with ovary opened laterally; 1, stamen, back, side and front views; J, gynoe-
cium; K, capsule; L, seed; M, testa cells. A-J, drawn from the type collection, Oliver & Oliver 11688-, K-M, from Oliver 11576. Scale
bars: B-K, 2 mm; L, 1 mm; M, 50 pm.
This new species is named after Dolf Schumann
(191 8-) senior author of that very fine illustrated book,
Ericas of South Africa (Schumann & Kirsten 1992). He
made collections of this and the next species on a joint
trip with Jan Vlok in 1985. This is the second species of
Erica that is named after him, the other being E. schu-
mannii E.G.H.Oliv. (Oliver & Oliver 1998a).
Erica dolfiana is known thus far from only two locali-
ties— the small peak just north of Tierberg and the ridges
west and east of Blesberg, some 40 kms to the east
(Figure 2). In the latter locality, Pienaar, on the label of
his specimen 67, noted that west of the peak the species
was fairly common on the upper northern slopes. Having
visited Blesberg peak in July and January, out of the
flowering season, we too saw numerous young plants but
only in fruit.
The species is confined to southern and northern
slopes at high altitudes where it grows in rocky/stony
places with very short alpine fynbos. It is very common
in the type locality where it is the dominant species of
Erica. On the open slopes the shrublets, together with the
other plants, are small and compact, whereas the few
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of
Erica dolfiana, ★; E. tay-
lorii, O.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
157
shrubs, among larger rocks in rocky areas, are looser and
up to 500 mm tall.
Vlok noted that the flowers gave off puffs of pollen
when disturbed. This was confirmed by us. The dull
white colour of the flowers renders them relatively
insignificant and, with the slightly enlarged stigma and
somewhat reduced nectaries, suggest both insect- and
wind-pollination strategies for the species (Rebelo et al.
1985). However, the stickiness of the flower heads,
caused by the glands on the bracts, bracteoles and calyx
segments, may discourage foraging insects from clam-
bering around the inflorescences.
Erica dolfiana would seem to be another of those
species in transition from insect- to wind-pollination,
with its small white or dull-coloured flowers as found in
so many other wind-pollinated Erica species. In our
experience, size differences between the flowers of
species point to different pollination syndromes, hut not
necessarily to different affinities. The other two unde-
scribed species in this possible alliance have been
observed by us to be pollinated by long-tongued flies.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Great Swartberg, peak
due south of highest point of jeep track, 2 000 m, (-AD), 5-11-1985.
Schumann 390 (NBG); peak behind Tierberg, 5800 ft. (-AD), 5-11-
1985, Vlok 1266 (K. NBG, NY. PRE); Blesberg. neck just E. 2 000 m,
(-BC), 13-07-2000, fruiting, Oliver 11576 (NBG); ibid., 6-01-2001,
fruiting, Oliver 11764 (NBG); ibid., neck just W, 5900 ft. (-BC). 12-11-
1976, Pienaar 67 (NBG).
2. Erica taylorii E.G.H.OIiv., sp. nov., pilis longis
in marginibus foliorum, bracteae, bracteolarum et sepa-
lorum, bractea bracteolisque magnis subpetaloideis,
antheris calcaribus brevibus crassis, ovario ramisque
puberulis dignoscenda. Figura 3.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3322 (Oudtshoom): Oudts-
hoom, Groot Swartberg, peak just north of Tierberg,
2 010 m, (-AD), 17 October 2000, E.G.H. & l.M. Oliver
11691 (NBG, holo.; BM, K, MO, NY, P, PRE).
Erica oresigena Bolus var. mollipila Bolus in Guthrie & Bolus: 129
(1905). Types: Worcester Div., on the Matrons Berg, Bolus s.n.
(BOL?); Clanwilliam Div.; Sneeuwkop. Cederberg Range near
Wuppertal, Bodkin sub Bolus 6492 (BOL!).
Illustration.; Schumann & Kirsten: 112, fig. 49. 50 (1992).
Low, prostrate, spreading shmblet up to 200 mm tall
and 0.5(-l,2) m across, single-stemmed reseeder.
Branches: main branches mostly prostrate, numerous old
and woody; numerous secondary branches ± 100-300
mm long, erect, with occasional ±5-10 mm long tertiary
branches, all ending in a florescence, intemodes very
short, all covered with fine dense short retrorse hairs,
occasionally interspersed with few plumose hairs on
older branches. Leaves 3- or 4-nate, imbricate, oblong,
3-5 X 1 mm, erect, adaxially flattened, abaxially round-
ed, with acute margins, finely hairy on both sides and
with short, stout, plumose hairs on margins, sulcus nar-
row, closed at base; petiole 0.6-0. 8 mm long, pubemlous
and edged with a few short, stout, plumose hairs.
Inflorescence: flowers 3 or 4 in l(-3) whorls, terminal on
secondary and tertiary branches; pedicel 2. 0-3. 5 mm
long, finely hairy with retrorse hairs and occasionally
short, stout, plumose hairs interspersed, reddish; bract
partially recaulescent from 'A-'A way up pedicel, oblong
to lanceolate, 3. 5-4. 5 x 1.0-1. 2 mm, cream to reddish
pink, sometimes with green mainly in upper half,
glabrous to finely hairy, with long, plumose marginal
hairs, sulcus narrow, Vz length of bract; bracteoles 2,
placed Y4 way up pedicel, 3.0 x 0. 7-1.0 mm, otherwise
like bract. Calyx 4-partite, segments slightly imbricate,
broadly lanceolate to ovate, 3. 5^. 5 x 1.0-1. 5 mm, red-
dish pink, glabrous to finely hairy, margins with long,
plumose hairs, sulcus '/z length of segment. Corolla 4-
lobed, 6-9 x 3-5 mm, ovoid-urceolate, finely puberulous
to glabrous, pink to dark pink, hairs white; lobes spread-
ing-recurved, rounded, 1. 5-2.0 x 1.8-2. 5 mm, erose.
Stamens 8, included, free; filaments linear, ± 4 mm,
slightly widening to base, with slight bend below anther,
glabrous, white; anthers bilobed, narrowly ovate to
oblong in adaxial view, dorsally attached near base,
appendiculate; thecae ovate to elliptic in lateral view,
1 .0-1.2 X 0.5-0.6 mm, erect, brown, very finely aculeate,
pore small V4-V5 length of theca, spurs subspreading,
abaxially ± 0.6 x 2.5 mm, occasionally toothed, pink;
pollen in tetrads. Ovary 4-locular, broadly obovoid to
globose, 2-3 x 2-3 mm, emarginate, covered with dense,
short hairs, red, with dark nectaries around base; ovules
40-50 per locule, spreading laterally from full-length
placenta; style included, + 4.5-5 .0 mm long, glabrous,
dull red; stigma capitate, dark red. Emit a dehiscent cap-
sule. ± 2.5 X 3.5 mm, valves splitting Y4 their length and
to 45° angle, septa only on valves, placenta large, con-
voluted and warty. Seeds ellipsoid, ± 0.6 x 0.35 mm,
shallowly reticulate-alveolate, brown; testa cells ± 100 x
40 pm, anticlinal walls jigsawed, inner periclinal walls
densely pitted. Elowering time: October to December.
Figure 3.
In Elora capensis Bolus (1905) described the variety
mollipila of his E. oresigena, based on collections from
Matroosberg and the Cederberg. Hugh Taylor, who stud-
ied the vegetation of the Cederberg, expressed surprise,
since he knew E. oresigena and did not think that Bolus’
variety mollipila belonged to the same species. It is a
mystery to us why Bolus did not describe the variety
mollipila as a separate species, since our studies have
shown that the two taxa differ in many critical characters
which indicates that this taxon is more closely related to
species other than E. oresigena. The only similar charac-
ters are those of the anthers. E. oresigena is an upright,
woody, rounded bush 0.5-1. 5 m tall. It is distinguished
by its long pedicels, entire corolla lobes, short, woolly
hairs on the pedicel and sepals, large dark red glands on
the margins of the bract, bracteoles, sepals and young
leaves, and by the ovary which is glabrous.
Erica taylorii, here described de novo as a distinct
species, is related to the group of species which is char-
acterized by plumose hairs and large, coloured, petaloid
bract and bracteoles. The group includes the E.
goatcheriana L. Bolus complex, E. modesta Salisb. and
the recently described E. schumannii E.G.H.OIiv. (Oliver
& Oliver 1998a) and E. kirstenii E.G.H.01iv.(01iver &
Oliver 2000). E. taylorii differs in having very few, rela-
tively short (not numerous and dense), plumose hairs on
158
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 3. — Erica taylorii. A, flowering branch, natural size; B, stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, flower; E, flower with corolla and ovary
cut open laterally; F, bract; G, bracteole; H, sepal; I, stamen, front, back and side views; J, gynoecium; K, seed; L, testa cells; M, typical
multiseriate plumose hair, A-J, drawn from the type collection, Oliver & Oliver II69I\ K & L, drawn from Oliver 10007a. Scale bars:
B-J, 2 mm; K, 1 mm; L, M, 100 pm.
the pedicel, and flowers in one, sometimes up to three
whorls. This latter character relates the species to two
species with plumose hairs and umbel-like inflores-
cences, namely E. cernua C.V.Montin and E. sphaero-
cephala J.C.Wendl. ex Benth. The former has a globose
corolla and larger anther appendages, whereas the latter
has much reduced bracteoles and sepals (not large and
petaloid), and long-aristate leaves, bract, bracteoles and
sepals.
This new species is named after the vegetation ecolo-
gist, the late Hugh Taylor (1925-1999), a colleague and
friend of many years who had a profound knowledge of
the Cape Flora (McDonald et al. 2()()0). He collected
many fine herbarium specimens, including one of this
species, made during his major vegetation survey of the
Cederberg Mountains.
Erica taylorii occurs in two widely separated areas,
the Swartberg Range above Ladismith and Oudtshoorn,
and the Cederberg Mountains east of Clanwilliam
(Figure 2). It is variable in the number of leaves per
whorl, number of flowers per inflorescence and in the
size of the corolla, which can be hairy or glabrous.
The Cederberg populations have 3- or 4-nate leaves,
whereas the Swartberg populations have only 4-nate
leaves. Most plants have a hairy corolla with the varia-
tion in indumentum not linked to any specific area. The
totally glabrous form occurs in Schumann 380 with the
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
159
type collection having a few flowers with some hairs on
the corolla lobes and slightly more in Vlok 1263. The
Seweweekspoort populations are all finely puberulous.
All the collections from the Cederberg have a hairy
corolla, except for a few branches on Bond 1403, which
have very short hairs only on the corolla lobes.
The eastern populations of the species are confined to
the Swartberg Range in two widely separated areas, one
above Ladismith along the Klein Swartberg in the region
of Seweweekspoort Mtn, and the other some 90 kms to
the east in the Tierberg area above Oudtshoorn. It is sur-
prising that no collections have been made on any of the
numerous intervening peaks where suitable habitats
surely occur, despite visits to these peaks by Stokoe,
Esterhuysen, Taylor and ourselves. We have selected our
recently collected material near Tierberg as the type of
the species, since it provided adequate isotypes and
excellent fresh material for us to study.
The type population was very localized on a small,
very low rocky ridge on the southern slopes, just below
the summit of the minor peak north of Tierberg. A few
plants were also found on nearby rocky outcrops. The
plants grew in crevices on the rocks and between rocks
and spread out over the surface for up to half a metre.
They were woody and in some cases had gnarled stems.
The open slopes surrounding the low ridge were covered
with numerous plants of E. dolfiana (see above) in very
short, alpine-like vegetation.
On the peaks just west of Seweweekspoort, E. taylorii
is apparently more common, judging by the collection
records of ‘frequent’. It was collected there by Andreae,
Barnard, Primos and Stokoe on the first expedition to the
Klein Swartberg in 1928 (Linder et al. 1993). On Hoeko
Peak we noted numbers of low. spreading plants growing
among short restiads and in rock crevices on northern
slopes, but only in fruit. Andreae recorded the plants as
'low spreading shrublets on ground or adpressed to rocks
on flat open places’. Vlok noted that plants were ‘fre-
quent on southern slope between large rock blocks’,
which could explain why he recorded the height of the
plants as ± 1.2 m, if they grew up among the rocks.
The populations in the Cederberg Mtns occur on the
highest peaks from Krakadouw to Sneeuberg, a distance
of 30 kms. Pocock, who made numerous collections of
plants in the Cederberg in the mid- 1920s, noted on her
collection 650 ‘found on all the high peaks but nowhere
abundant except on Krakadouw Great Peak’.
While looking for E. cedromontana E.G.H.Oliv.
(Oliver & Oliver 1998b) on the Langberg, we searched
for E. taylorii too, but did not locate any plants. Thus
details of the habit and habitat are taken from other col-
lectors’ notes. Pocock recorded plants as ‘low shrubs
3-15 inches tall, growing on small vlaktes and crannies
among rocks on Krakadouw’ and ‘stunted shrub in
cracks in rocks’ on Sneeukop summit. Taylor recorded it
as growing ‘in small Ischyrolepis cur\’iramis sand flat on
bedrock’ and Stehle gave ‘on rocks’.
Esterhuysen gave a detailed record of the species on
the Sneeuberg when she collected some old fruiting
material in April. She wrote ‘plants were common and
conspicuous on the south side in rocky places — mostly
growing from rock crevices in flat or sloping rock and
spreading out over rocks forming low dense masses, pro-
tected from fires’. She also made the interesting obser-
vation that the plants were rooting along the stems.
The record by Harry Bolus of a Bolus s.n. specimen
from Matroosberg, a syntype of his E. oresigena var.
mollipila, was regarded by us as doubtful. This collection
was not filed under E. oresigena in BOL, but was noted
on the sheet as having been removed by Elsie
Esterhuysen to E. maderi where, unfortunately, it cannot
now be found. The collection must have consisted of a
flowering branch 100 mm long, deduced from the clear
imprint on the sheet where it had formerly been mount-
ed and annotated by Bolus, and certainly gives the
impression of being E. maderi, which is common on the
lower slopes of Matroosberg. A collection of that species
from Matroosberg by Alfred Bolus is housed in SAM.
The other syntype of the variety, which was collected by
Bodkin from the Cederberg, consists of three small
branchlets in poor condition with just six buds and six
mature flowers.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal); Krakadouw Peak, summit.
5900-6700 ft. (-AA), Pocock 650 (NBG); Groot Krakadouw, summit
massif. 1 700 m, (-AA), 22 November 1987, Taylor 11905 (NBG);
Sneeukop, (-AC), Bodkin sub Bolus 6492 (BOL); ibid., 5500-6300 ft,
6-04-1969. fruiting, Esterhuysen s.n. (BOL); ibid.. 6300 ft. 13-10-
1923. Pocock 214 (NBG); Langberg, 6000 ft. 15-12-1941, Bond 1403
(NBG); ibid.. 15-12-1941, Esterhuysen 7306 (BOL, SAM); Sneeuberg
Peak, 6200 ft, (-AC), 2-\l-\969^ Stehle 310 (NBG); Wolfterg Arch
area. (-AD). 28-11-1959. Jessop sub Oliver 324 (NBG). 3321
(Ladismith); Toverkop. 6000-7000 ft, (-AC). 15-12-1956, Esterhuysen
26759 (BOL); Seven Weeks Poort Mtn, 2 300 m, (-AD), 26-12-1928,
Andreae 1181 (BOL, NBG); ibid.. 5000-7000 ft, 12-1928. Barnard in
SAM46306 (SAM); ibid., 1 800-2 100 m. 26-12-1928, Primos 16
(BOL. NBG); ibid., 7200 ft, 26-12-1928, Stokoe 1878 (BOL); ibid.,
7500 ft, 5-01-1981, Vlok 140 (NBG); Hoeko Peak, 1 900 m, (-AD), 4-
02-1992, fruiting flowers only, Oliver 10007a (NBG). 3322
(Oudtshoorn); Great Swartberg, peak north of Tierberg, 6250 ft, (-AD),
5-11-1985. Vlok 1263 (NBG); ibid.. 1 900 m, 5-11-1985, Schumann
389 (NBG. PRE).
THE ERICA ESTERHUYSENIAE COMPLEX
The following three new species form a complex with
E. esterhuyseniae Compton. They are all confined to
high altitudes along the Klein and Groot Swartberg
ranges and in some places grow sympatrically.
Erica esterhuyseniae was described by Compton in
1941 (Compton 1941). In the protologue he divided the
species into two varieties, var. a tetramera and var. 6
trimera based on the distinction of 4-nate versus 3-nate
leaves. According to the current nomenclatural rules he
should have retained the epithet ‘esterhuyseniae' under
the autonym rule for the var. a (Oliver & Oliver 1994).
We support Compton’s recognition of two separate
taxa. but with all the additional material available to us,
feel that there are sufficient grounds for separating them
at specific level. The number of leaves per whorl is a
clear distinction, but one which Compton felt was of
‘less systematic importance’ in E. esterhuyseniae. There
160
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
FIGURE 4. — Known distribution of
Erica oreotragus, •, and E.
esterhuyseniae, O.
are, however, several other eharacters which he did not
notice and which can be used to distinguish the two taxa
(see below).
3. Erica esterhuyseniae Compton: 193 (1941) pro
E. esterhuyseniae var. a tetrarnera', Dulfer; 75 (1965); E.
esterhuyseniae var. esterhuyseniae, E.G.H.Oliv. &
I.M.Oliv.: 27 (1994). Type: Cape Province. Uniondale
Division: Kamanassiberg [Kammanassie] (Mannetjies-
berg), 1 700 m, 1-02-1941, Compton 70557 (NBG!).
Illustration: Compton: 194. fig. 3 (left), 1-12 (1941 ).
Erica esterhuyseniae is characterized by the 4-nate
leaves which are relatively broad, open-backed and
curve inwards, and the long, narrow, almost acuminate,
corolla lobes '13-/2 length of corolla. It is allied to E.
oreotragus and E. hlaerioides (see below).
The species occurs on the far-eastern portion of the
Swartberg Range around Blesberg, on the Karoo insel-
berg — the Kammanassie Mtns just to the south, and on
the western half of the Kouga Mtns (Figure 4). In all
localities it grows on the south-facing upper slopes in
sandy loamy soil, or in areas where there is more mois-
ture in winter, which is the case with our recent collec-
tion, 11799, from the drier foothill ridge just north of the
main range of Blesberg.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE.— 3322 (Oudt.shoorn): Blesberg, (-BC), 17-10-
1955, Esterhuvsen 24917 (BOL); ibid,, 2 040 m, 13-07-2000 (fruiting),
Oliver 11549 (NBG); ibid,, 1 960 m, 7-01-2001, Oliver 11779 (NBG);
ibid., northern foothill ridge, 1 840 m, 7-01-2001, Oliver 11799 (NBG);
Great Swartberg at Kolberg, 1 500 m, (-BD), 20-03-1983, Schumann
93 (NBG); Kammanassie Mtns, Buffelsberg, 5000 ft, (-DB), 29-01-
1929. Viviers & Vlok 37 (NBG); Kammanassie Mtns, Mannetjiesberg,
(-DC), 1-02-1941, Compton /0557 (NBG); ibid., 5000 ft, 1-02-1941,
Esterhuysen 4762 (BOL, K, PRE); ibid., 1 800 m, 9-01-2001, Oliver
1 183 1 (NBG). 3323 (Uniondale): Hoopsberg, 5000 ft, (-CB), 12-03-
1966, Kourke 399 (NBG); Kouga Mtns, Saptoukop. 1 530 m, (-DA),
16-12-1991, Oliver 9938a (NBG).
4. Erica oreotragu.s E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., Ericae
esterhuy.seniae Compton alTinis sed ab ea foliis ternatis
angustioribus sulco minus aperto, lobis corollae angus-
tioribus, calcaribus antherarum latioribus differt. Figura 5.
E. esterhuyseniae Compton var. trimera Compton: 193 (1941);
Dulfer: 75 (1965); E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.: 27 (1994). Type: Cape
Province. Oudtshoorn Division: Swartberg Pass, 2 000 m, 28-12-1941.
Bond 866 (NBG, holo.!; BOL!, PRE).
Illustration: Compton: 194, fig. 3 (right), 1-10 (1941).
Frect, sparse to suberect and compact, shrublet, 300-
400 mm high, single-stemmed reseeder. Branches:
numerous main branches 50-100 mm long, terminating
in an inflorescence, internodes 2-10 mm long, occa-
sional short, secondary branches 2-5 mm long with or
without terminal inflorescence; all branches covered
with dense, short, spreading hairs or with short and long
hairs intermixed. Leaves 3-nate, erect incurved, broadly
ovate to elliptic, 2. 0-3. 2 x 0.8-1. 3 mm, subacute, adax-
ially flat, abaxially rounded, margins acute, densely
hairy on both surfaces, sulcus partially open, closed at
base; petiole ± 1 mm long, hairs all over or only on mar-
gin. Inflorescence: flowers 3-nate in 2, rarely 3, whorls
in umbel-like group at apices of main and secondary
branches; pedicel ±1.2 mm long, glabrous to finely and
shortly hairy; bract partially recaulescent, in mid posi-
tion on pedicel, narrowly lanceolate to linear, 0.7-1. 6 x
0.1 mm, variable in size in an inflorescence, glabrous
but ciliate along margin, esulcate, greenish red to
whitish; bracteoles 2, in mid position, minute or reduced
to just a tuft of hairs within an inflorescence, esulcate.
Ccdyx 4-partite, very slightly fused at base; segments
lanceolate to ovate, 1.5-1. 8 x 0.5 mm, subacute, puberu-
lous to glabrescent, ciliate with long, spreading hairs
and occasionally 1 or 2 minute subsessile to sessile
glands, sulcus fairly broad, 73-72 length of lobe. Corolla
4-lobed, urceolate, ± 3.3 x 2.0 mm, with 4 bulges at
base, densely hairy with short and long spreading hairs
admixed, pale pinkish to white; lobes spreading, ± 1 mm
long, broadly rounded, subacute to obtuse, margins
minutely crenulate to entire. Stamens 8, included, free;
filaments ± 1.5 mm long, widening towards base, with
marked apical S-bend; anthers bilobed, elliptic in out-
line in adaxial view, dorsally attached near base, appen-
diculate; thecae erect adpressed, narrowly ovate-elliptic
in lateral view, ± 0.8 x 0.3 mm, glabrous, smooth.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001) 15]
FIGURE 5. — Erica oreotragus. A. flowering branch, natural size; B, stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, flower; E, corolla, F, bract; G. bracte-
ole; H. sepal; 1. stamen, side, front & back views; J, gynoecium; K. ovary opened laterally. L, capsule; M. seed; N. testa cells. All drawn
from the type collection. Scale bars: B-H. 2 mm; 1-M. 1 mm.
brown, pore ± 'A length of theca; spurs ± 0.6 x 0.2-0. 1
mm, attenuate from broad flat base, unevenly serrate to
entire and shortly ciliate, brown; pollen in tetrads.
Ovary 4-locular, globose. ±1x1 mm, obtuse, densely
and shortly hairy, with distinct nectaries around base;
ovules ± 9 per locule. pendulous from placenta in upper
-/s; style included, terete, glabrous, white; stigma simple,
rounded, reddish. Fruit a dehiscent capsule, ± 1.7 x 2.2
mm. valves fused up to 7s their length spreading to 45°,
equally on valves and columella. Seeds ± 0.6 x 0.3 mm,
4-ridged, abaxially rounded, laterally and adaxially flat-
tened, reticulate, orange-yellow, testa cells 100-125 x
27 pm, with undulate thick anticlinal walls, periclinal
walls with a few very small pits. Flowering time:
December to March. Figure 5.
This new species and the other two new species
described here, namely E. blaerioides and E. chionodes,
are closely allied to E. esterhuyseniae. All three new
species, however, have 3-nate leaves, whereas in E.
esterhuyseniae they are 4-nate.
Erica oreotragus occurs on the Klein Swartberg and
on the western and central portions of the Groot
Swartberg (Figure 4) with no areas of overlap with E.
esterhuyseniae, which occurs much further east. It grows
sympatrically with E. blaerioides in the Botes Nek area
(see below).
The epithet for this, the commoner of the two former
varieties of E. esterhuyseniae, is derived from Oreo-
tragus oreotragus. the scientific name of the small klip-
springer buck which is often seen in the Cape folded
mountains. We who have the privilege of knowing the
remarkable Elsie Esterhuysen (1912-) and of having
been out in the mountains collecting with her, will
always have visions of a metaphorical klipspringer hop-
ping from rock to rock and darting around the slopes,
selecting choice plants for the collecting bag and press.
Elsie is in her element roaming these Cape mountains.
This epithet is chosen in fond remembrance.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Klein Swartberg. N slopes
of Hoeko Peak. 2 080 m, (-AD), 3-02-1992, Oliver 10004 (NBG. PRE);
Seven Weeks Poort Mtn. 7000 ft. (-AD), 12-1928. Primos 24 (BOL.
NBG, PRE); Calitzdorp area, Groot Swartberg in Botes Nek area.
6000 ft [1 830 m], (-BD), 31-12-1969. Oliver 3068 (NBG). 3322
(Oudtshoom): Swartberg Pass, 1 590 m. 6-02-1986, Brusse 4866 (NBG.
PRE); ibid., 5000 ft. 25-01-1941, Esterhuysen 4513 (BOL); ibid.,
5000 ft, 25-01-1941. Esterhuysen 4772 (BOL); ibid., 28-01-1961,
Esterhuysen 28806 (BOL, K. PRE); ibid.. S side, 1 500 m, (-AC), 01-
1979. Oliver 7407 (NBG); ibid,, 03-1942. Stokoe in SAM55440 (SAM).
Swartberg, without precise locality, 01-1935. Stokoe 6668 (BOL).
5. Erica chionodes E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., synflor-
escentibus longis densis spicatis, floribus niveis puberu-
162
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
FIGURE 6. — Erica chionodes. A, tlowering branch, natural size; B, lateral flowering branchlet; C, stem with leaves removed; D. leaf; E, flower;
E. flower, half section; G, bract; H, bracteole; I, calyx lobe; J, stamen, back, front and side views; K, ovary and stigma; L, capsule with
one valve removed; M, seed; N, testa cells. All drawn from the type collection. Scale bars: B-E, L, 2 mm; G-K, M, 1 mm; N, 100 pm.
lis, ramis puberulis, foliis abaxialiter semipatentibus,
calcaribus antherarum longis angustis, ovario hinsuto
dignoscenda. Figura 6.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3322 (Oudtshoorn): Oudts-
hoorn, Groot Swartberg, peak just north of Tierberg,
small kloof WNW of peak, 1 720 m, (-AD), 17 October
2000, E.G.H. & l.M. Oliver 11699 (NBG, holo.; BM,
BOL, K, MO, NY, P, PRE, S).
Illustration: pro E. esterhuvseniae, Schumann & Kirsten: 1 16. fig,
70.71(1992).
Erect, sparse to compact shrub up to 600 mm tall, sin-
gle-stemmed reseeder. Branches', main branches erect
30-50(-80) mm long, with determinate, occasionally
continuing growth; secondary branchlets very short, ±
1-2 mm long on every node; tertiary branchlets occa-
sional, ± 1 mm long on previous year’s secondary
branchlets; all branches pilose to hirsute with spreading
hairs. Leaves 3-nate, subspreading, narrowly lanceolate-
oblong, 2. 5-3. 5 X 0.4- 1.2 mm, adaxially Oat, abaxially
rounded with rounded margins, partially open-backed,
sulcus broad, open at base, pilose to hirsute all over
except in sulcus; petiole 0.5 mm long, pilose.
Inflorescence: Powers l(-3)-nate on ends of secondary,
and occasionally tertiary, branchlets, crowded along and
towards ends of main branches in den.se spike-like syn-
llorescences l00(-200) mm long; pedicel 1.7 mm long,
pilose, pale red; bract partially recaulescent about Ve way
up pedicel, narrowly lanceolate, 0.4 x 0.15 mm, not sul-
cate, pilose, white; bracteoles 2, like bract but placed
slightly higher up pedicel and slightly smaller. Calyx 4-
lobed, 0.9 x 0.5 mm, tube about 'A length of calyx; lobes
ovate, adpressed to corolla, with very short, subapical,
wide sulcus, puberulous, very pale green to white.
Corolla 4-lobed, urceolate, 2. 8-3. 8 x 2.0 mm, puberu-
lous, white; lobes 0.8 x 1.0 mm, rounded, erose. Stamens
8, included; filaments free, linear, ± 2 mm long, with
slight apical S-bend, glabrous, white; anther bilobed,
dorsally attached near base, ovate in adaxial view, appen-
diculate; thecae erect adpressed, ovate-elliptic in lateral
outline, ± 0.5 x 0.3 mm, aculeate, brown, spurs irregu-
larly linear-lanceolate, ± 0.7 mm long, slightly longer
than thecae, pendulous, with few lateral teeth, yellowish,
pore '/i-'/z length of theca; pollen in tetrads. Ovary 4-
locular, broadly obovoid, ± 1 .0 x 0.9 mm, rounded, fine-
ly hairy all over, green, with reddish green apical portion
and dark red nectaries around base; ovules ± 6 per locule,
pendulous from placenta in upper half of locule; style
manifest, 2 mm long, dull reddish; stigma truncate to
sub-capitulate, dull red. Fruit a dehiscent capsule, ± 1.5
X 1.8 mm, valves fused ± 'U at base, opening to ± 45°
angle; septa about equally .split on valve and columella.
Seeds ellipsoid, ± 0.5 x 0.4 mm, slightly flattened later-
ally, testa medium hard in texture, orange, reticulate-
alveolate, cells 60-75 x 35^5 pm, anticlinal walls
undulate to slightly jigsawed, inner periclinal wall pitted
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
163
FIGURE 7. — Known distribution of
Erica chionodes. ■; E. blae-
rioides subsp. blaerioides,
•; E. blaerioides subsp. hir-
suta. O.
with fairly large pits occasionally coalescing. Flowering
time: September to November. Figure 6.
Erica chionodes is distinguisheti by the long, dense,
spike-like synflorescences with pure white, finely hairy
flowers, partially open-backed leaves, long, narrow, pen-
dulous anther appendages and hairy ovary. It is closest to
E. oreotragus E.G.H.Oliv. (see above) which is common
along the full length of the Swartberg Range and has
flowers in terminal 6-8-flowered heads on main branch-
es (not in spike-like synflorescences), glabrous, mostly
shorter pedicels, longer sepals which are about half the
length of the corolla and have fewer longer hairs, rela-
tively long corolla lobes, and anther appendages shorter
than the thecae and broader and hairy. It is also allied to
the new species, E. blaerioides (see below).
The species was studied by us in a large kloof on the
northwest side of Tierberg above the Cango Caves, Oudts-
hoom (Figure 7), where we saw just two populations.
Both are growing in seepage areas with a predominance
of low, matted species of Restionaceae. The profusion of
brilliant white flowers contrasted dramatically against
the dark restiads and was reminiscent of patches of snow,
hence the epithet, chionodes - like snow (Greek).
The type population was undoubtedly the one seen by
the first and only other collectors of the species, Vlok &
Schumann in 1985. In the kloof the species was common
and grew together with another very striking, but pink-
flowered species, E. nervata Guthrie & Bolus. The pop-
ulation was studied on a hot sunny afternoon when sev-
eral flies and beetles were seen to visit the flowers. The
flowers gave off no detectable scent. The population
lower down and across the valley (11705) was growing
in a pure stand of restiads in a seepage area close to the
main stream and had older flowers.
There is a record from Toverberg above Ladismith in
the Klein Swartberg by Esterhuysen (Esterhuysen
26768) — ‘S slopes near base of shale band, slightly
marshy’. No colour is recorded for the flowers. This
specimen fits the species, but is more compact in growth
with shorter synflorescences and has 4-nate leaves. The
large gap between the two areas is similar to that in the
previous species, E. taylorii, described here, and is also
surprising, although in this case the wet seepage habitat
is very much scarcer than the rocky one of the latter.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Swartberg Mtns. main
kloof running north just NW of Tierberg. sides of main stream.
1 400 m. (-AC), 17-10-2000. Oliver 11705 (E. NBG. W); next to track
near Tierberg. 4600 ft. (-AD). 5-11-1985. Vlok & Schumann 1264
(BM. BOL, k. NBG. NY. PRE).
6. Erica blaerioides E.G.H.Oliv., sp. nov., Ericae
oreotragus E.G.H.Oliv. affmis, sed ab ea synflorescen-
tibus breviter spicatis, bractea bracteola subaequanti dif-
fer!. Eigura 8.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3321 (Ladismith): Calitzdorp
area, Groot Swartberg in Botes Nek area, 6000 ft
[1 830 mj, (-BD), 31 December 1969, Oliver 3049
(NBG, holo.; BM, BOL, K, NY, PRE).
Erect, compact, much branched shrublet to 0.3 m,
rarely 1.2 m tall, with thin twiggy branches, single-
stemmed reseeder. Branches: numerous, thin; main
branches 20-50(-100) mm long, with continuous apical
growth, secondary branches 1-5 mm long ending in an
inflorescence, all branches covered with simple short
spreading hairs, intemodes 1.0-1. 5 mm long. Eeaves 3-
nate, erect, slightly incurved, occasionally spreading
when older, lanceolate to elliptic, 1.7-2. 2 x 0. 6-0.8 mm,
adaxially flat, abaxially rounded, with subacute margins,
partially open-backed to narrowly sulcate, sulcus open at
base, puberulous to sparsely so when young with longer
apical tuft, glabrescent with age; petiole ± 0.5-0. 9 mm
long, glabrous, ciliate. Inflorescence: flowers 3 in 1
whorl at apex of secondary branches; pedicel ± 2. 0-3. 5
mm long, glabrous to puberulous; bract partially
recaulescent, way up pedicel, narrowly oblong to
lanceolate, 1.4 x 0.2-0.3 mm. white, glabrous or sparse-
ly puberulous, ciliate, sulcus very small or absent;
bracteoles 2, slightly above bract, otherwise same as
bract. Calyx 4-partite, very slightly fused at base; seg-
ments not imbricate, mostly adpressed to corolla, lance-
olate to broadly so, ± 1.4— 2.2 mm long, acute, white,
glabrous or puberulous, ciliate with hairs and a few non-
sticky short-stalked glands, sulcus ± V3 length of sepal.
164
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 8. — Erica bUierioides subsp. htaerioides. A, tlowering branch, natural size; B, llowering branchlet with single inllorescence; C, stem
with leaves removed; D, two leaves; E, flower; F, flower, cut open longitudinally; G, bract; H, bracteole; 1, sepal; J, stamen, back, side and
front views; K, gynoecitim; capsule, with one valve removed; M, seed; N, testa cells. Subsp. hirsuta. O, leaf; P, flower; Q, stamen; R,
gynoecium. A-N. drawn from the type of the species, Oliver 3049\ O-R, from the type, Oliver 5529. Scale bars: B-1, O, P, 2 mm; J-M.
Q. R, I mm; N, 50 pm.
narrow. Corolla 4-lobed, narrowly urceolate, 3. 2-3.4 x
1 .7-2.0 mm, sparsely puberiiloiis to puberulous, white;
lobes SLiberect to recurved, narrowly deltoid to broadly
so, 0.6-0. 9 X 0.5 mm, subacute to rounded, margins
erose. Stamens 4-8, free, included; filaments oblong,
1 .2-1.5 X 0.2 mm, slightly widened in middle or towards
base, with marked apical S-hend, glabrous, white;
anthers bipartite, erect, lanceolate to oblong in adaxial
view, dorsal ly attached near base, appendiculate; thecae
erect adpressed, curved oblong in lateral view, 0. 6-0.9 x
0.2-0. 3 mm, aculeate, brown, pore ± '/i length of cell,
appendages irregularly shaped, 0. 3-0.6 x 0. 1-0.2 mm,
irregularly lacerate, puberulous; pollen in tetrads. Ovary
4-locular, broadly obovoid to globose, 0.8-1 .0 x 0.7 mm,
very slightly emarginate, puberulous to puberulous in
upper half only, with well developed nectaries around
ba.se; ovules 8-12 per locule, pendulous from placenta
almost the length of columella; style included, straight.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
165
1. 5-2.0 mm long, glabrous; stigma simple truncate. Fruit
a dehiscent capsule, valves splitting nearly to base and to
± 45°, delicate, not hard and woody, septa only on the
valves. Seeds elongate ovoid, ± 0.6 x 0.3 mm, orange,
testa cells 75-100 x 25 pm, anticlinal walls slightly
thickened, straight to very slightly and irregularly undu-
late, no pits in inner periclinal walls. Figure 8.
The species occurs at high altitudes only in the west-
ern parts of the Groot Swartberg Range and eastern Klein
Swartberg (Figure 7).
Erica blaerioides is closely related to the previous
two species. It has spike-like synflorescences similar to
those of E. chionodes, but differs in these being looser
and much shorter, in having longer sepals, a differently
shaped corolla which is more sparsely hairy with longer
hairs, differently shaped ovary, stamens in a lower posi-
tion in the corolla and very different seeds. It is also
allied in many respects to E. oreotragus, but differs in the
form of its inflorescence which is spike-like and not
umbel-like, and by its subequal bract and bracteoles.
This new species is divided into two subspecies on a
number of characters, which show slight disjunctions —
stamen number, size of the leaf sulcus, hairiness of the
bract, bracteoles and sepals, and size of the sepals and
anther appendages. The two taxa are allopatric. The type
of the species and typical subspecies has been chosen
from among the field collections made by the first author
in the eastern populations.
subsp. blaerioides
Stamens always 4; bract, bracteoles and sepals
glabrous but ciliate; leaves partially open-backed; longer,
narrower sepals (1. 6-2.0 mm long); broader, larger
anther appendages (Figure 9A-N). Flowering time:
December and January.
The typical subspecies has been recorded from the
summit ridge of the Groot Swartberg from Botes Nek to
above Kliphuisvlei (Figure 7) where it occurs on cool
south-facing slopes. In the type locality the species
occurred sympatrically with E. oreotragus and was easi-
ly recognizable as a distinct species mainly on the differ-
ences in the inflorescence types.
subsp. hirsuta E.G.H.Oliv., subsp. nov., a sub-
specie typica foliis minus sulcatis, omnibus partibus
floris (staminibus exclusis) puberulis, sepalis brevioribus
et latioribus (± 1.4 mm longis), staminibus 4-8 cal-
caribus angustioribus differt. Figura 90-R.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3321 (Ladismith): Klein
Swartberg, Seweweekspoort peak, 7500 ft [2 280 m],
(-AD), 5-01-1981, Vlok 139 (NBG).
This subspecies is distinguished from the typical sub-
species in having leaves not quite as open-backed, all
parts of the flower (excluding stamens) puberulous,
shorter and broader sepals (±1.4 mm long) and 4-8 sta-
mens with narrower appendages (Figure 90-R).
Flowering time: December and January.
The subspecies has been recorded from the high alti-
tudes of the eastern end of the Klein Swartberg
Mountains Just west of Seweweekspoort (Figure 7)
where it has been recorded growing with E. oreotragus.
It was first collected by two of the first group of botani-
cal explorers of that rugged high area in December 1928,
Andreae and Stokoe (Linder et al. 1993) (see also E. tay-
lorii above). This area is about 40 kms west of the popu-
lations of subsp. blaerioides. Other than the peak just
east of Seweweekspoort which we have investigated, the
intervening mountain range has not to our knowledge
ever been botanised. However, this range decreases in
altitude down to the large Gamkaskloof and would there-
fore most probably not provide the type of high altitude,
cool slopes required by the species.
Paratype material
subsp. blaerioides
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Oudtshoom, Groot Swart-
berg, summit ridge above Kliphuisvlei. 1 900 m, (-BD). 1-01-1975,
Oliver 5529 (NBG, PRE); ibid., 6500 ft [1 980 m], 17-01-1954, Taylor
1087 {BOD.
subsp. hirsuta
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Klein Swartberg, Klein
Swartberg Peak [?Seweweekspoortberg], 6700 ft [2 040 m], (-AD), 28-
12-1928, Andreae 1280 (BOL, PRE); ibid., 6800 ft [2 070 m], 28-12-
1928, Stokoe 1768 (NBG. PRE), as 1768a (BOL, PRE); Sewe-
weekspoort Peak, (-AD), 12-1928, Stokoe 6669 (BOL, K, PRE).
REEERENCES
BOLUS, H. 1894. Contributions to the Flora of South Africa. 1. Erica-
ceae. Journal of Botany 1894: 234—290.
GUTHRIE. F. & BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. In W.T. Thistleton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 4: 4—315.
COMPTON, R.H. 1941. Plantae novae africanae. Journal of South
African Botany 1\ 193-195.
DULFER. H. 1965. Revision der sUdafrikanischen Arten der Gattung
Erica L. 2. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien
68: 25-177.
LINDER. H R, VLOK, I.H., MCDONALD, D.J., OLIVER, E.G.H.,
BOUCHER, C., VAN WYK, B.-E, & SCHUTTE, A. 1993. The
high altitude flora and vegetation of the Cape Floristic Region,
South Africa. Opera Botanica 121: 247-261.
MCDONALD, D.I.. BOUCHER, C., & OLIVER, E.G.H. 2000. Obi-
tuary: Hugh Colin Taylor (1925-1999). Bothalia 30: 1 15-119.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 1994. Studies in the Ericoideae
(Ericaceae). XIV. Notes on the genus Erica. Bothalia 24:
25-30.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 1998a. Erica schumannii, a new
mat-forming species from South Africa. Yearbook of the Heather
Society 1998: 32-38.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 1998b. Three new species of Erica
(Ericaceae) from South Africa, Novon 8: 267-274.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 2000. Erica kirstenii, a new rock-
loving species from South Africa. Yearbook of the Heather
Society 2000: 57-62.
REBELO, A.G., SIEGFRIED, W.R. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1985.
Pollination syndromes of Erica species in the south-western
Cape. South African Journal of Botany 51: 270-280.
SCHUMANN. D, & KIRSTEN, G. 1992. Ericas of South Africa. Fern-
wood Press, Cape Town.
Bothalia 31,2: 167-173 (2001)
Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from
southern Africa. 1. The genus Aneura and its local representative
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aneuraceae, Aneura pingiiis (L.) Dumort., Aneuroideae, Riccardia Gray, southern Africa, taxonomic problems
ABSTRACT
This is the first of several projected articles dealing with the southern African Aneuraceae H.Klinggr. The family is
cosmopolitan and comprises two subfamilies, only one of which, the Aneuroideae, with two genera, Aneura Dumort.
and Riccardia Gray, occurs locally. Because of the taxonomic problems associated with this family and the scarcity of
fruiting material, only one taxon in the genus Aneura, A. pinguis (L.) Dumort.. has so far been accepted in this treat-
ment. This is not meant to imply, however, that A. pseiidopinguis Herzog does not occur in southern Africa; only, that
the specimens I have examined, all belong to A. pinguis. A description and illustrations of A. pinguis. together with a
distribution map are provided.
INTRODUCTION
One of the relatively smaller families within the order
Metzgeriales, is the cosmopolitan Aneuraceae H.Klinggr.
It is divided into two subfamilies, which together com-
prise only four genera, but more than 200 species world-
wide. Only one subfamily, the Aneuroideae (Schuster
1992). with two genera, occurs in southern Africa:
Aneura Dumort. with one locally, infrequently collected
species, and the more common Riccardia Gray, with sev-
eral species. These two hygrophilous genera are related.
Initially, and up to the middle of the 20th century, they
were treated as synonyms, ‘sometimes using the former
name and sometimes the latter, for the same taxon’
(Grolle 1993).
The genera Aneu/'fl and Riccardia may be separated as
follows:
Aneura
Thalli prostrate, closely adherent to substrate, fleshy,
bright green and with somewhat greasy lustre, robust,
2^(-7) mm wide, ligulate; apices rounded or scarcely
emarginate; branching subsimple, developing few lateral
pinnae; oil bodies in cells numerous, clear and small,
2. 5-7. 5 pm diam.; in cross section thallus (9)10-15 (or
more) cells thick medianly, thallus gradually becoming
thinner toward undulate or plicate margins. Rhizoids
restricted to median ventral surface. Gemmae absent in
local species.
Dioicous; male branches with 2-A- irregular rows of
antheridia; female branches rudimentary with inflores-
cences sessile and ventrally hidden in deep lateral notch,
archegonia in 2 or more rows; shoot-calyptra large,
clavate, rounded at summit, corona inconspicuous; seta
thick, 9-16 cells diam.; capsule valves with thickenings
along longitudinal walls of epidermal cells on both adax-
ial and abaxial surfaces; spores 18.0-27.5 pm diam.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-05-23.
Riccardia
Thalli prostrate, rarely erect, pale to deep green, rela-
tively delicate and narrow, 0. 5-2.0 mm wide, linear to
Ungulate; apices emarginate, rounded or truncate;
branching freely, mostly uni- to rarely multipinnate; oil
bodies sometimes absent in epidermal cells, otherwise
1-3(4) per cell, brown or black, large, 7.5-20.0 x 5-9
pm, ovoid, spherical or ellipsoid; in cross section axis up
to 9 cells thick, margins plane. Rhizoids scattered on
ventral surface. Gemmae endogenously produced on
dorsal surface of thallus and 2-celled.
Dioicous, autoicous or heteroicous; male branches lat-
eral, linear, with 2 regular rows of antheridia in 2-8 pairs;
female branches lateral, well developed, with 2 rows of
archegonia; shoot-calyptra medium-sized, clavate or
cylindrical, corona conspicuous; seta slender, 4 cells
diam.; capsule valves with thickenings confined to adax-
ial faces of longitudinal radial walls of epidermal cells.
In both genera there is little anatomical differentia-
tion, usually without any distinction between the wings
and midrib or nerve (the epithet Aneura, signifies the
absence of a nerve). Because of their simplicity in organ-
ization, there are few distinctive characters. Moreover,
frequent variability, apparently environmentally induced,
in those few features that are available, make them diffi-
cult to study. Taxonomically it is widely accepted that the
Aneuraceae is one of the most troublesome families
among the Hepaticae.
The long, narrow thalli of Riccardia species in particular,
often grow in intricately intertwined, densely overlying
mats, with more than one species sometimes being pre-
sent. The branches are rather brittle, and unravelling and
cleaning them for study needs to be done with care and
is time-consuming. Sterile plants are of little value, as
gametangial and sporophytic characters are necessary for
the correct placing of specimens; unfortunately, they are
frequently without sporophytes, although they may pro-
duce gametangia. Furthermore, as they soon disappear,
the oil bodies in samples from fresh plants, that are
preferably kept in a refrigerator at 5°-6°C, need to be
168
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
photographed and studied as soon as possible after col-
lection. Data from disintegrating oil bodies can be mis-
leading.
It is also recommended that plants should be studied
in cultivation.
Meenks ( 1987) is of the opinion that herbarium collec-
tions are often useless, particularly if they are more than
20 years old. Type specimens are, however, far older gen-
erally, yet one needs to study them to compare them with
fresh, living collections, however difficult that may be.
HISTORICAL NOTES
The Aneuraceae have been relatively poorly studied
in southern Africa. Lehmann (1829) described our first
new local taxon, Aneura (sub Jungermannia) fastigiata,
collected by Ecklon on Devil’s Peak and Table Mountain
and compared it to A. (sub J.) multifida, which he also
reported from Table Mountain, as well as two varieties of
it. Gottsche et al. (1844-1847) accepted the presence of
A. fastigiata, but compared it to A. palmata. They also
briefly mentioned Ecklon’s collections of A. pinnatifida
and A. multifida from Promontorium Bonae Spei
(Gottsche et al. 1844-1847: 788).
No further species were recorded from tropical or
southern Africa (Jones 1956), until Stephani (1886)
reported R. pinguis L. from S. Tome. During 1890-1893
and 1917 Stephani described more than 20 new species
from the African continent and the Mascareignes. Gola
(1914) and Pearson (1922) each described one new
species from Africa. Sim (1926) described no new
species in his treatment, and only briefly mentioned A.
fastigiata and A. compacta. Then, in 1952, S.W. Amell
described five new species from southern Africa. In
1963, he placed one of them, R. submarginata, in syn-
onymy under the Brazilian species R. pseudopinguis
Herzog (1942), although he had previously agreed with
Jones (1956) that it was identical with R. pinguis. Jones
(1956) was very conservative in his treatment of
Riccardia species in tropical Africa. He placed some of
Stephani’s species in synonymy and made several new
combinations, transferring four of Stephani’s Aneura
species to Riccardia, as the distinctions between the two
genera had become generally accepted by then. Vanden
Berghen (1972) reported the presence of A. pseudopin-
guis from Shaba, Kafubu and Lufira in Zaire (Demo-
cratic Republic of Congo).
In 1981, Jones drew attention to an inversion of spe-
cific epithets that had occurred on the herbarium labels
of the type specimens of A. congoana Steph. and A. con-
goensis Steph. Later, Jones & Harrington (1983) report-
ed R. angusticosta and R. limhata from Sierra Leone and
Ghana, as well as an unidentified Riccardia species from
Ghana. Gradstein et al. (1983) announced the presence
of A. pseudopinguis in West and East Africa, and in
the same article Poes transferred it from Riccardia to
Aneura.
The last treatment of East African Aneuraceae was by
Meenks & Poes ( 1 985), as a large number of unidentified
specimens and new information had accumulated in the
meantime. Although they present a key to the African
species of the family, and give extensive lists of speci-
mens examined, literature records and distribution maps,
only one species, R. compacta, is illustrated. Illustrations
by Amell (1952, 1963) are generally poor and Stephani’s
leones (1985) are not freely available. Schuster (1992)
remarked, with some justification, that African taxa of
the Aneuraceae remain poorly known, as Arnell’s treat-
ment is far from satisfactory.
It is accordingly considered necessary to revise at
least the southern African members of the Aneuraceae,
which often represent southern extensions of range, and
to give good illustrations wherever possible. This publi-
cation is the first in a series of projected papers on the
local Aneuraceae.
METHODS AND MATERIAL STUDIED
With some exceptions, the same methodology as was
employed in my treatment of southern African Fossom-
hronia species (Perold 1997), is followed here: 1, sam-
ples of field-collected specimens were fixed in EAA on
the day of collection; 2, more samples were selected for
oil body study and cultivation and initially kept at
5°-6°C in transparent screw boxes, lined with damp fil-
ter paper; and 3, the rest of the specimens, destined to be
held in the herbarium, were allowed to air-dry rapidly.
Only traditional morphological-anatomical and histolog-
ical methods were employed. Ear less extensive use of
the SEM was made in this study, however, as the spores
of our local Riccardia species do not display marked dif-
ferences in their ornamentation. The drawings were
based on photographs taken with a camera mounted on a
Nikon light microscope. The Degree Reference System
(Edwards & Leistner 1971) was again used for recording
distribution data.
Specimens e.xamined
(held at PRE, unless otherwise indicated)
S.VV. Amell 1552, 1766 (types of R. submarginata BOL); 1782
(BOL); 1803, 1844 (S).
Burgoyne 2462.
Cholnoky s.n. (S) KwaZulu-Natal; grid unknown and not indicated
on Figure 2.
Koekemoer 2063.
Perold 3774, 3823. Perold & Koekemoer 4304, 4483, 4504, 4514.
Aneuraceae H.Klinggr., Die hoheren Cryptogamen
Preussens: 11 (1858); Mull.Erib.: 492 (1951-1958);
S.W.Amell; 84 (1963); Euruki: 306 (1991); R.M.Schust.:
545 (1992); Paton: 537 (1999); Bednarek-Ochyra et al.;
178 (2000). Type; Aneura Dumort.
Plants thalloid, prostrate or sometimes ascending,
bright green with greasy lustre or light to dark green,
robust and fleshy. Ungulate to sublinear, 2^(-6) mm
wide or narrow and thin, relatively delicate, mostly lin-
ear, 0. 5-2.0 mm wide, apices rounded or emarginate,
margins undulate, sometimes flat or plane and entire.
Branching virtually simple to sparse, branches laterally
and irregularly lobed or freely pinnate to quadripinnate.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
169
occasionally crowded. Dorsal epidermal cells generally
somewhat smaller than internal cells, not otherwise dif-
ferentiated, usually thin-walled, occasionally with
minute trigones, 5-7-angled. Oil bodies in each cell,
either numerous and then small and hyaline, or only
1-3(4), and then large, finely granular and brown or
black, rarely absent. Cross section of main axis plano-
convex to concavo-convex with weakly recurved mar-
gins, or flattened to biconvex; pluristratose medianly,
usually 9-15 cells thick, gradually thinning out laterally
to margins, acute, winged, or obtuse, without discrete
midrib, internally homogeneous, lower cells sometimes
with basidiomycete fungal hyphae. Mucilage papillae
often in 2 alternate ventral rows, one on each side of mid-
line and/or clustered at apex of thallus. Rhizoids restrict-
ed to ventral median area or scattered over ventral sur-
face of thallus. Asexual reproduction absent or by 2-
celled, endogenously produced gemmae.
Dioicous, monoicous or synoicous. Sexual branches
lateral from main thallus, short and determinate in
length; male branches single or in sympodial pairs or in
threes, antheridia in up to 4 irregular rows or in 2 regular
rows of antheridial chambers, each containing a single
antheridium, dorsally exposed; female branches within
deep lateral notch of thallus or almost sessile laterally,
archegonia in 2 or more rows, protected by papilliform
or finger-like paraphyses. Shoot-calyptra large, clavate
or cylindrical, with wall several cell layers thick, surface
almost smooth or bearing papillose outgrowths. Seta
thick. 10-12 cells diam., or slender and only 4 cells
diam. Capsule ellipsoidal, 4-valved, wall bistratose,
outer cell layer with bands of thickening on adaxial and
abaxial radial walls; inner cell layer with bands of thick-
ening on adaxial and abaxial radial and inner tangential
walls, or else, outer cell layer with bands of thickening
on adaxial radial and inner tangential walls, without
bands of thickening on inner cell layer. Spores relatively
small, up to 27.5 pm diam., finely papillose, or only up
to ± 20 pm diam., minutely scabrate. Elaters up to ± 350
pm long, uni-spiral, band reddish brown, 7.5-10.0 pm
wide, tapering at both ends. Elaterophores in fascicles at
apices of valves.
Aneura Dumort., Commentationes Botanicae: 1 15
(1822); Hewson: 184 (1970); Furuki: 308 (1991);
R.M.Schust.: 551 (1992); Paton: 537 (1999). Type spe-
cies: Aneura pinguis (L.) Dumort.
Jungermannia pinguis L.: 1136 (1753).
Trichostyliiim Corda: 116 (1835); Nees: 475 (1838);
R.M.Schust.: 53 (1958).
Riccardia subgenus Trichostyliiim Mizut. & S.Hatt.:
35 (1957).
Thalli prostrate, clear green and greasy, robust, fleshy,
dorsally flat or slightly concave, gradually thinning out
from thick median region to margins, smooth, up to 35
mm long, 2^(-6) mm wide. Ungulate to sublinear,
apices rounded or slightly emarginate, margins undulate,
sometimes flat. Branching sparse and irregular. Oil bod-
ies (2-)5-24(-67) in all dorsal epidermal and inner cells.
subglobose or ovoid, 2. 5-5.0 pm diam., hyaline. Cross
section of thallus (9)10-15 cells thick medianly, acute at
margins. Mucilage papillae only on ventral surface of
thallus, in 2 rows, one on each side of midline and clus-
tered at branch apices. Rhizoids restricted to median area
of ventral surface of thallus. Asexual reproduction ab-
sent, gemmae unknown in local species.
Dioicous. Heterothallic. Male thalli somewhat small-
er, antheridial branches single or sympodially paired and
antheridia in up to 4 irregular rows, separating walls usu-
ally bistratose, dorso-lateral wing up to 6 cells wide.
Eemale branches shielded and hidden in deep, lateral
notches of thallus, paraphyses around and between
archegonia. Shoot-calyptrae large, ± 10 mm long, fleshy,
wall ± 500 pm thick, corona inconspicuous. Setae mas-
sive, 10-12 cells diam., spirally twisted. Capsules ellip-
soidal, 4-valved, bistratose, epidermal cells with nodular
thickenings of both adaxial and abaxial radial longitudi-
nal walls; inner cell walls with numerous annular or
semiannular (tangential) bands. Spores finely papillose,
20.0- 27.5 pm diam. Elaters up to 350 pm long, 10 pm
wide, unispiral.
Aneura pinguis (L.) Dumort., Commentationes
Botanicae; 115 (1822); Dumort.: 86 (1831); Gottsche et
al.: 493 (1844-1847); Steph.: 762/272 (1899); Mull.Frib.:
331 (1908); Brown & Braggins (with question mark): 117
(1989); Furuki: 311 (1991); R.M.Schust.: 555 (1992);
Paton: 539 (1999). Jungermannia pinguis L.: 1136
(1753). Riccardia pinguis (L.) Gray: 683 (1821);
Mull.Frib.: 494 (1951-1958); S.W.Amell: 30 (1956);
E.W.Jones: 84 ( 1956). Trichostyliiim pinguis R.M.Schust.:
53 (1958). Type: ‘Habitat in Europae paludibus’, sin.
coll.. Dill, in ‘Historia Muscorum: 509. Lichenastrum
no. 42. t. 74, fig. 42 (1741)’ fOXF, syn.; H-SOL,
isosyn.].
R. viridissima Schiffn.: 176 ( 1898). A. viridissima (Schiffn.) Steph.:
763/273 (1899). Type: Java. Prov. Batavia, in monte Megamendon,
Schiffner 235, syntype (JE, L. PR. PRC, W), fide Furuki 1991.
A. laurentiana Steph.: 32 (1917). R. laurentiana (Steph.) Demaret:
306 (1942). Type: Congo, env. d'Eala, Laurent 64 (G).
R. submarginata S.W.Amell: 139 (1952). Types: Deepwall Forest
Reserve. V2 mile south of Forest Station, S.W. Arnell 1552, 1766
(BOLI; S).
A complete list of synonyms is provided in R.M. Schuster (1992:
555, 556).
Thalli prostrate, in patches, bright green, with greasy
lustre, smooth, yellow when dried, opaque, becoming
translucent toward margins, otherwise fleshy, robust,
axis plane to slightly concave, subsimple, Ungulate to
sublinear, 15-35 mm long, 2-6(-7) mm wide, apices
rounded, margins entire, undulate to somewhat crisped
or lobed. Branching sparse, not pinnate, often short,
sometimes long, inegularly furcate. Dorsal epidermal
cells (Eigure IH) from above, 4—6(7)-sided, thin-walled,
50.0- 87.5 X 37.5-62.5 pm; subdorsal cells (Eigure II)
1 12.5-175.0 X 87.5-132.5 pm; subventral cells 100-160
X 50-75 pm; ventral epidermal cells 62.5-100.0 x 37.5-
50.0 pm. Oil bodies in all cells, several to numerous,
(2-)5-24(-67), small, 2. 5-5.0 pm diam., spherical to
subspherical or ovoid, faintly granular, inconspicuous.
170
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 1. — Aneura pinguis. A, male thallus with antheridial branches; B, female thallus with calyptra, shortened seta and capsule, old, collapsed
calyptra on upper right, very young calyptra opposite it. C-I, thallus: C, c/s; D, E, c/s marginal part; F, c/s median part; G, margin from
above; H, dorsal epidermal cells with oil bodies; I, subdorsal cells with oil bodies. J, rhizoid with ramified tip and internal mycorrhizal
hypha. K-M, male branches: K, partly from side, only one wing shown; L, c/s; M, wing. N, O, young female branches: N, ventral view,
located at notch in thallus margin; O, lateral view. P, paraphysis. Q-T, capsule: Q, valve with elaterophore at tip. R, c/s part of bistratose
wall, with thickenings: abr, abaxial radial; adr, adaxial radial; mw, median; it, inner tangential; ot, outer tangential. S, thickenings of outer
cell layer; T, thickenings of inner cell layer. U, calyptra; V, c/s calyptra; W, c/s seta; X, spore; Y, elater. A, B, N, S, T, W-Y, Perold &
Koekemoer 4504\ C, D, F, H, I, K-M, 0-R, U, V, Perold <6 Koekernoer 45I4\ E, G, Perold & Koekemoer 4483; J, Perold 3823. Scale bars:
A, B, U, 2 mm; C, K, L, 500 pm; D, E, G, .1, S, T, 100 pm; H, 1, R, Y, 50 pm; Q, I mm; F, M-P, V, W, 250 pm; X, 25 pm.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
171
colourless, scattered or occasionally aggregated in clus-
ters. Marginal cells (Figure IG): outermost row unis-
tratose, rectangular, 47.5-75.0 x 25^5 jam, inner cells
angular, bistratose, 42.5-55.0 x 37.5-62.5 |jm. Cross
section of thallus (Figure 1C) plano-convex to concavo-
convex, with wings weakly recurved, medianly pluris-
tratose (Figure IF), 9-15 cells (or 460-650 pm) thick,
gradually becoming thinner laterally, epidermal cells
chlorophyllose, 37.5-50.0 pm high, shallower than inter-
nal, hyaline cells, but not forming a distinctive layer;
margins acute, bordered by bistratose wing, 3 cells wide
plus a single conical cell (Figure ID, E), ± 50 pm high.
Mucilage papillae clustered at ventral apices of branch-
es and spaced along 2 rows, one on each side of midline,
clavate, 105-114 x 42.5-51.0 pm, not persistent.
Rhizoids restricted to ventral median area, 17.5-25.0 pm
wide, sometimes ramified at tips and occasionally with
mycorrhizal hyphae (Figure IJ). Asexual reproduction
by gemmae absent.
Dioicous. Male plants (Figure lA) somewhat smaller
than female plants, axis up to 17 x 3. 5^. 2 mm and medi-
anly 9-11 cell layers thick, in close proximity to female
plants, virtually touching; antheridial branches (Figure
IK) lateral, solitary, sublinear, 2.8 mm long or more, ±
1.15 mm wide and ± 850 pm thick (Figure IL), scal-
loped, bistratose wings (Figure IM), 300-500 pm or 6-8
cells wide, a continuation of thallus margin; otherwise
divided into 2 or 3 branches, from near base or further
along, up to 2.4 mm wide, antheridial chambers very
irregularly arranged, not in rows, 2-4 across width of
branch; antheridia subglobular, 200-250 pm wide, cavi-
ty walls between them bistratose; after antheridial pro-
duction, branch may continue vegetative growth. Female
plants (Figure IB) with archegonial branches very short,
ventral to lateral notch in thallus margin, at base of deep
sinus and obscured by reflexed thallus folds on each side
(Figure IN), archegonia in rows, hidden by densely
crowded paraphyses, up to ± 500 pm long, composed of
single strands of cells joined end to end (Figure lO) or
partly of 3 or more rows of laterally joined cells (Figure
IP). Calyptra clavate, large (Figure lU), 10-12 mm
long, ± 2 mm diam., wall 8 or 9 cell layers (+ 500 pm)
thick, cells in cross section (Figure IV) 5-7-sided,
65-100 X 62.5-75.0 pm. outermost cells of wall in sur-
face view long-rectangular, 150-170 x 60-75 pm, in
lower part of calyptra often developing rhizoids, but
becoming nearly smooth with age, corona inconspi-
cuous, base partly sheathed by adjacent, suberect thallus
margins. Seta up to 21 mm long, somewhat spirally
twisted, 750 pm or 15 cells diam. in cross section (Figure
IW), marginal cells small, 32.5-47.5 x 25-40 pm, inner
cells round, 55-75 pm diam. Capsules oblong-ovoid,
reddish brown, 2500-3250 pm long, with 4 valves, each
one ± 1050 pm (or ± 42 cells) wide, bistratose, to either
side of midline of every valve, thickenings laid down as
a mirror image; epidermal (outer) cells in external longi-
tudinal view (Figure IS) with nodular thickenings, cells
usually narrowly rectangular, 162.5-232.5 x 15.0-37.5
pm, in cross section (Figure IR), thickenings only rarely
extending slightly across outer tangential walls, mostly
on adaxial radial and abaxial radial walls; inner cells in
internal longitudinal view (Figure IT) less regular, taper-
ing or with oblique end walls, 142.5-220.0 x 32.5-67.5
pm, in cross section (Figure IR) adaxial radial longitudi-
nal walls all develop bands which extend across inner
tangential walls and connect with abaxial radial bands on
opposite side of cell, thickenings therefore ± U-shaped
(Figure IR). Spores 20.0-27.5 pm diam., dark brown,
papillose (Figure IX). Elaters (Figure lY) 212.5-350.0
X 10 pm, with single spiral band, ± 10 pm broad, pink-
ish red, tapering to ends, these without spiral.
Elateropliores 1000-1445 x 220 pm, one at tip of each
valve (Figure IQ). Chromosome no.: n = 10 (Fritsch
1982).
Aneura pinguis is subcosmopolitan in its distribution
and has been reported from many localities worldwide;
South America and Australia are, however, excluded. It
is also present in southern Africa, but is infrequently col-
lected (Figure 2). It grows on soil or rotting wood, in per-
manently damp areas, often fed by seepages.
DISCUSSION
Aneura specimens have recently been collected at a
few localities in Mpumalanga, Eastern Free State,
KwaZulu-Natal, Western and Eastern Cape, but Perold
& Koekemoer 4405 & 4415 from Garcia’s Pass, near
Ladismith in Western Cape, are the only specimens that
are fertile, with both mature male plants bearing ripe
antheridia on lateral branches, as well as female plants
with calyptrae and ripe capsules. Samples of these have
been preserved in EAA for future reference. These spec-
imens have been referred to Aneura pinguis because of
the following characters: 1, the large, bright green, rather
greasy-looking, fleshy and opaque thalli; 2, thalli in cross
section medianly up to 15 cell rows thick; 3, each cell
with several to many minute, colourless oil bodies; 4,
2— f rows of antheridial chambers; 5, spores that are
20.0-27.5 pm diam. On one side of the same male thal-
lus of Perold & Koekemoer 4514, there are a few short,
ligulate male branches, bearing the antheridia in 2 or 3
rows, whereas on its opposite side, there are several fur-
cate male branches, some of which are wider and
rounder at the apices, with up to 4 irregular rows of
numerous antheridia.
Meenks & Poes (1985) have drawn up a short table
differentiating between A. pinguis and A. pseudopinguis.
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Aneura pinguis in southern Africa.
172
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
but there appears to be some overlap in the characters
assigned to these two species in our local specimens.
Meenks & Poes regard A. pinguis as having opaque thal-
li, medianly (9)10-20 cells thick, with relatively short
male lobes, which seldom branch and contain 2-5(6)
pairs of antheridia; the spores are 20-25 pm diam. On
the other hand, A. pseudopinguis thalli are, according to
them, translucent, medianly only 5-8(9) cells thick, the
male branches are longer, often with 3 (seldom 4) rows
or 7-10(-20) pairs of antheridia, and the spores are
13-16 pm diam.
In the specimens they studied, Gradstein et al. (1983)
regarded the identity as confirmed in ‘only the records of
plants possessing either male branches or spores’. They
also report that in African samples of A. pseudopinguis
‘usually only one sex is found in a particular locality’.
This is contrary to the findings in our two fertile collec-
tions refeiTed to above, and may provide further evi-
dence that we are dealing with A. pinguis.
In 1952 Arnell reported his new Riccardia siibmar-
ginata from Deepwall Forest Reserve. There were no
mature capsules with spores, but the median cross sec-
tions of the thalli were given as 15 cell rows thick. In my
examination of Arnell’s specimens the median cross sec-
tions of the thalli ranged from 8-13 cell rows thick.
As already remarked in the paragraphs on ‘Historical
notes’, Arnell had admitted to Jones (1956) that, the
Deepwall specimens were identical to R. pinguis,
although later, Arnell (1963) placed R. submarginata in
synonymy under R. pseudopinguis. Arnell was familiar
with European representatives of R. pinguis, as he had
described it in 1956 in his Flora Fennoscandia. Arnell
(1963) also gave vegetative characters, based on the size
of the thallus cells in R. pinguis, but these characters
appear to be in contradiction with his own account of
Scandinavian A. pinguis, as noted by Gradstein et al.
(1983).
Vanden Berghen (1972) reported the Congoan pres-
ence of A. pseudopinguis from Shaba, Kafubu in Lufira.
Hodgetts et al. (1999) also reported A. pseudopinguis
from Lesotho, northeast and west of New Oxbow Lodge,
but gave no details of their plants. Herzog (1942) de-
scribed his new species, R. pseudopinguis, from Brazil as
follows: thallus is medianly 6-8 cells thick in cross sec-
tion, male branches are elongated, ligulate, sometimes
furcate at the base, and the antheridia are in 8-10 serial
pairs, whereas the spores are 13-16 pm in diameter. He
suggested that previous collections from neighbouring
areas, which had been assigned to R. pinguis, should be
checked against his new species. In 1956, Jones placed
R. submarginata in synonymy under R. pinguis. In his
plants from West Africa, however, the central portion of
the thallus is 5-7 or occasionally 9 cells thick, which
would place them nearer to A. pseudopinguis. Wigginton
& Grolle (1996) observed that, ‘A. pseudopinguis is
sometimes considered to be conspecific with A. pin-
guis'. Schuster (1989) noted that, ‘The status of A. pin-
guis s. lat. badly needs world-wide study. Ever since
Showalter (1926, 1928) showed that, so-called ‘races’
of the holarctic populations were, in some cases inter-
sterile, the matter of how to define this species has been
highly uncertain’. Lurthermore, it seemed most unlike-
ly to Schuster that a species could occur in the Arctic
polar desert of Ellesmere Island and also in tropical and
subtropical areas. He concluded this paragraph with the
following observation, ‘Recent study has also shown
that the tropical American-African plants formerly
referred to A. pinguis represent A. pseudopinguis Herz’.
According to Meenks & Poes (1985), however, both
taxa occur in East Africa, as well as in West Africa
(Gradstein et al. 1983), but A. pinguis appears to be rarer
in tropical Africa than A. pseudopinguis. In southern
Africa, A. pinguis is very infrequently collected and fer-
tile plants are the exception by far, rather than the rule;
this scarcity of fruiting material further complicates the
study of these plants. To quote Proskauer (1971),
"Riccardia pinguis, a species which we have long known
to present a nightmarish problem ..., probably requiring
more than a single lifetime of research for a minimum
understanding’.
Stephani (1899) placed R. latissima (Spruce) Schiffn.
in synonymy under R. pinguis. However, Meenks & De
Jong (1985) note that, the oil bodies in A. latissima are
bright brown, not clear and colourless, as they are in A.
pinguis. Eurthermore, a chromosome no. n = 8, has been
reported by Nakata & Inoue (1989) for A. latissima,
whereas the chromosome no. n = 10 is given for A. pin-
guis. Stephani’s synonymy of A. latissima under A. pin-
guis, is, accordingly not accepted here.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the curators of BOL and S for the loan
of specimens; the curator of PRE, Ms M. Koekemoer, for
all her help with fieldwork; Dr T. Furuki and Dr O.A.
Leistner for their helpful comments; the artist, Ms G.
Condy; the photographer, Mrs A. Romanowski and the
typist, Ms D. Maree.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1952, Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa
(1951). New and little-known species. Botaniska Notiser 105:
307-315.
ARNELL, S.W. 1956. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. 1. Hepa-
ticae. Gleerup, Lund.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural
Science Council, Stockholm.
BEDNAREK-OCHYRA, H., VANA, J.. OCHYRA, R. & LEWIS
SMITH, R.I, 2000. The liverwort flora of Antarctica. Polish
Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Cracow.
BROWN, E.A. & BRAGGINS, J.E. 1989. A revision of the genus
Riccardia S.F.Gray in New Zealand with notes on the genus
Aneura Dum. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Lcdioratory 66:
1-132.
CORDA, A.K.J. 1835. Deutschlands Jungermannien. In J. Sturm,
Deutschlands Flora nach der Natur mit Beschreihungen 2,5/6:
116-121. Berlin.
DEMARET, F. 1942. Prodrome des Bryophytes du Congo-Beige et du
Ruanda-Burundi. II. Hepaticae, Bulletin duJardin Botanique de
FEtat d Bruxelles 16: 306,
DILLENIUS, J.J. 1741. Historia muscoruin. Sheldon, Oxford.
DUMORTIER, B.C. 1822. Coinnientationes Botanicae: 1-117. Tournay.
DUMORTIER, B.C. 1831. Sylloge Jungennannidearnni Europae indi-
genaruni, earuni genera et species systematice complectens:
l-lOO, Tournay.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
173
EDWARDS. D. & LEISTNER, O.A. 1971. A degree reference system
for citing biological records in southern Africa. Mitteilungen
der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Mimchen 10: 501-509.
FRITSCH, R. 1982. Index to plant chromosome numbers — Bryophyta.
Regnum Vegetabile 108: 1-268.
FURUKl. T. 1991. A taxonomical revision of the Aneuraceae
(Hepaticae) of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 70: 293-397.
GOFA, G. 1914. Fe epatiche della regione del Kenia. Memorie della R.
Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, ser. 2, 65: 1-1 1.
GOTTSCHE. C.M., FINDENBERG. J.B.G. & NEES AB ESEN-
BECK, C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Meissner,
Hamburg. Reprinted 1967, Cramer, Lehre.
GRADSTEIN, S.R., POCS. T. & VANA, J. 1983. Disjunct hepaticae in
tropical America and Africa. Acta Botanica Hungarica 29:
127-171.
GRAY, S.F, 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants, vol. 1.
London.
GROLLE. R. 1993. Proposal to conserve Anenra Dumort. (Hepaticae)
with a conserved type. Taxon 42: 889. 890.
HERZOG, T. 1942. Beitrage zur Kenntnis neotropischer Bryophyten.
Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt, Abt. B, 62: 560, 561.
HEWSON, H.J. 1970. The family Aneuraceae in Australia and New
Guinea: 1. The genus Aneiira. Proceedings of the Linnean
Society of New South Wales 94: 173-193.
HODGETTS. N.G.. MATCHAM, H.W. & DUCKETT. J.G. 1999.
Bryophytes collected in Lesotho, the Natal Drakensberg and the
Orange Free State, southern Africa. Journal of Bryology 2 1 :
133-155.
JONES. E.W. 1956, African hepatics XI. The genus RIccardia in trop-
ical Africa. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 3:
74-84.
JONES, E.W. 1981. African hepatics XXXII. Some little-known
species and extensions of range. Journal of Bryology 11:
311-323.
JONES. E.W. & HARRINGTON, A.J. 1983. The Hepaticae of Sierra
Leone and Ghana. Bulletin of the British Museum {Natural
History), Botanical series, 11: 215-289.
KLINGGRAFF von. H.E.M. 1858. Die hoheren Cryptogamen
Preussens. Ein Beitrag zur Flora der Provinz. Koch, Konigsberg.
LEHMANN. J.G.C. 1829. Hepaticarum capensium a C.F Ecklon col-
lectarum brevem recensionem. Linnaea 4: 357-371.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Salvius, Stockholm.
MEENKS, J.L.D. 1987. Studies on Colombian cryptogams XXVIII. A
guide to the tropical Andean species of Riccardia (Hepaticae).
Jounuil of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 62: 161-182.
MEENKS, J.L.D. & DE JONG. C. 1985. Light microscope studies of
the oil bodies of Andean Aneuraceae (Hepaticae). Cryptogamie.
Bryologie, Lichenologie 6: 1-24.
MEENKS. J.L.D. & POCS. T. 1985. East African Bryophytes IX.
Aneuraceae. Abstracta Botanica 9: 79-98.
MIZUTANI. M. & HATTORI, S. 1957. An etude on the systematics of
Japanese Riccardias. Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 18: 27-64.
MULLER, K. (Miill.Frib.) 1905-1916. Die Lebermoose Deutschlands,
Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Dr L. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-
Flora 2. edn 6. part 1: 1-870. Geest & Portig. Leipzig.
MULLER, K. (Mull.Frib.) 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr
L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen- Flora 6, edn 3: 308—474. Geest
& Portig, Leipzig.
NAKATA, M. & INOUE, H. 1989, Further observations on chromo-
somes of Aneura latissima Spruce. Bulletin of the Natural
Science Mirseum, Tokyo, ser. B, 15: 139-143.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europdischen
Lebermoose 4: 1-540.
PATON, J.A. 1999. The liverwort flora of the British Isles. Harley
Books. Colchester.
PEARSON, W.H. 1922. Notes on a collection of hepatics from the
Cameroons, West Coast of Africa. Memoirs and Proceedings of
the Manchester Literary a?ul Philosophical Society 65: 1-6.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossomhronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1. Three new species from
Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga. Bothalia 27:
17-27.
PROSKAUER, J. 1971. Notes on Hepaticae. V. Bryologist 74: 1-9.
SCHIFFNER, V. 1898. Conspectus hepaticarum archipelagi indici.
Batavia.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1958. Keys to the orders, families and genera of
Hepaticae of America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 61:
1-66.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1989. Studies on the hepatic flora of the Prince
Edward Islands. 1 . Aneuraceae. Journal of the Hattori
Botanical Laboratory 67: 59-108.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America 5: 1-854. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SHOWALTER. A.M. 1926. Studies in the cytology of the
Anacrogynae. II. Fertilisation in Riccardia pinguis. Annals of
Botany 40: 713-726.
SHOWALTER, A.M. 1928. Studies in the cytology of the
Anacrogynae. V. Hybrid fertilization in Riccardia pinguis. La
Cellule 38: 295-348.
SIM. T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1—175. Cape Town.
STEPHANI, F. 1886. Flora de S. Thome. Hepaticae, in Contributiones
para o estudo da Flora d'Africa. Boletim da Sociedade Brote-
riana, Coimbra A: 170-184.
STEPHANI. F 1890. Hepaticae Africanae novae in insulis Bourbon,
Maurice et Madagascar lectae. Botanical Gazette 15: 281-292.
STEPHANI, F. 1891. Hepaticae Africanae. Hedwigia 30: 265-274.
STEPHANI, F. 1892. Hepaticae Africanae. Hedwigia 31: 198-214.
STEPHANI, F. 1893. Hepaticae species novae. Hedwigia 32: 19, 23.
STEPHANI. F. 1899. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de L'Herbier
Boissier 1: 1C2. 763.
STEPHANI. F. 1917. Species hepaticarum, vol. VI: 19—16. Geneve et
Bale. Georg et Cie, Lyon (meme maison).
STEPHANI, F. 1985. leones hepaticarum. Microfiche, Inter
Documentation Company bv, Leiden.
VANDEN BERGHEN. C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. In J.J.
Symoens, Resultats scientifiques. Exploration hydrobiologique
du hassin du lac Bangweolo et du Luapula 8,1 .
WIGGINGTON. M.J. & GROLLE. R. (Supplemented by GYAR-
MATI, A.) 1996. Catalogue of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae
of sub-Saharan Africa. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 50: 1-267.
Cramer, Berlin.
Bothalia 31,2: 175-181 (2001)
Three new species of Tritoniopsis (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) from the
Cape Region of South Africa
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
Keywords: Iridaceae, new species, pollination, South Africa, taxonomy, Tritoniopsis L. Bolus, T. bicolor J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, T. flava
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, T. toximontana J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, Western Cape
ABSTRACT
Three new species of the largely Western Cape genus Tritoniopsis L, Bolus are described, bringing the number of species
in the genus to 24. Tritoniopsis bicolor and T. flava are newly discovered, narrow endemics of the Bredasdorp Mountains
and the Kogelberg Biosphere Reserve, respectively, in the southwestern Cape. Both of these are areas of high local
endemism. T. toximontana. known since at least 1965 but misunderstood, is restricted to the Gifberg-Matsikamma
Mountain complex of northern Western Cape. Notes on the pollination biology of the species are provided.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Tritoniopsis L. Bolus (Iridaceae: Croco-
ideae) is a near-endemic of the Cape Floristic Region
(Goldblatt & Manning 2000a), with a single species, T
cajfra (Ker Gawl. ex Baker) Goldblatt, extending east-
wards to East London. The genus is a particularly char-
acteristic member of the Cape Flora as almost all of the
species are restricted to acidic, nutrient-poor soils
derived from sandstones of the Cape system. Originally
established to accommodate the single species Tritoniop-
sis lesliei L. Bolus (Bolus 1929), the genus was subse-
quently combined with Exohehea Foster (Phillips 1951;
Lewis 1959), and finally expanded to include the species
previously placed in Anapalina N.E.Br. (Goldblatt
1990). The 21 species currently recognised exhibit a
wide diversity in floral morphology but are united by
several highly unusual characters. The leaves of Trito-
niopsis, which are hysteranthus in all species, are unlike
most other genera of Iridaceae subfamily Crocoideae
(Goldblatt et al. 2000) in lacking a well-developed
pseudomidrib or central vein, having instead one to
seven equally prominent main veins. Flowering in most
species is delayed until summer or autumn, and although
green leaves are often evident at flowering time, these
sometimes represent vegetative growth derived from the
daughter corm. The contemporary appearance of leaves
and flowering shoots from successive generations is
unknown among hysteranthus Iridaceae and is correlated
with the persistence of corms from previous years’
growth and the late flowering habit. In other hysteran-
thus taxa of Iridaceae, leafing of the daughter corm typi-
cally occurs only after the flowering shoot of the parent
corm has died down. Alternatively, as in some species of
Gladiolus L., leaves are produced on a separate sterile
shoot later in the season. Tritoniopsis is also unusual in
having the inner floral bracts longer than the outer and
not evidently notched at the apices. The flowers,
although highly diverse in form, are always strongly
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735, Cape Town.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Garden,
P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2001-03-07.
herkogamous. This spatial separation of pollen and style
is achieved through the recurving of the filaments a few
days after anthesis, whereby they carry the anthers well
away from the style, the branches of which only become
receptive after the filaments have diverged. This charac-
teristic, noted by Lewis (1960) in her revision of the
species placed in Anapalina, was apparently overlooked
in her earlier account of Tritoniopsis s.s. (Lewis 1959)
but is characteristic of all species of the genus. Another
distinctive characteristic of most of the species is the way
in which the tepals gape at the tips in bud, several days
before anthesis actually occurs. This feature has not been
commented on before and is otherwise unknown in the
family. Finally, the seeds of almost all species of
Tritoniopsis are tetrahedral or pyramidal in shape and
typically more or less winged on the angles. Species in
which the seeds are larger and more prominently winged
invariably produce much-inflated capsules. This range of
autapomorphies accord with indications that the genus is
taxonomically isolated within subfamily Crocoideae.
Several of the species have restricted ranges and the
three described here are no exception. One species, T
toximontana, appears to be restricted to the Gifberg and
Matsikamma massif, while T. bicolor and T flava are
each known from single populations in the Bredasdorp
Mountains and Kogelberg Biosphere Reserve in the
southwestern Cape respectively. Both of these are areas
of high local endemism (Goldblatt & Manning 2000a).
Tritoniopsis bicolor J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp.
nov., plantae 200-400(-600) mm altae usitate eramosae,
cormo globoso 20-30 mm diam. tunicis fibris brunneis
dense implexis conferto, foliis 5-9 inferioribus (4)5-7
basalibus viridis vel extemis siccis ad tempore floredi in
pseudopetiolum subteretem 30-35 mm longum infime
abrupte contractis, lamina anguste lanceolata ( 85-) 1 00- 1 50
X (5-)6-10 mm prominente 1-2(3 )-nervata, foliis caulinis 1
vel 2 subsquamosis, spica 20-35-flora, bracteis infime
viridibus supeme siccis brunneisque, externa 7-10 mm
longa acuta, interna 8-1 1 mm longa obtusa, floribus zygo-
morphis mo.schatis vel pungentibis odoris flavis tepalibus
tribus infemis marroninus suffusis in medio atrostriatis ore
tubi et basibus tepalarum minute papillosis, perianthii tubo
2-5 mm longo, tepalis inaequalibus marginibus undulato-
176
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
crispis dorsale 14—16 x 3^ nim inferioribus tribus 9-15
mm infemis connatis laminis 9-10 mm longis, filamentis
6-7 mm longis, antheris ± 3 mm longis apiculis ± 0.5 mm
longis ferentibus, styli ramis ± 1 mm longis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): western end
of Bredasdorp Mtn, plateau west of Grootkop and
Normanskop, (-BD), 6 Dec. 2000, Manning 2286 (NBG,
holo.; K, MO, NBG, PRE, iso.).
FIGURE 1 . — Tritouiopsis hicolor.
A, corm; B. flowering spike
and leaves. C-E, flower: C,
front view; D, side view; E,
half flower. F, capsules; G,
seed. Scale burs: A-F, 10
inm; G, 10 mm. Artist: John
Manning.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
177
Plants 200^00(-600) mm high. Conns globose,
20-30 mm diam., tunics of densely matted fine brown
fibres with well-developed neck, corms from previous
seasons persistent. Leaves 5-9, lower (4)5-7 basal, green
at flowering or the outermost drying, contracted abrupt-
ly into semiterete pseudopetiole 30-35 x 1.0-2. 5 mm,
blade narrowly lanceolate, acuminate, with 1 or 2(3)
main veins, (85-)100-150 x (5)6-10 mm, cauline leaves
evidently 1 or 2, represented by minute scales, lower
cauline leaf concealed by fibrous corm neck. Stem mod-
erately slender to robust, decurved just above ground
level neck and then suberect or weakly inclined,
unbranched, 2. 5^.0 mm diam. near base. Spike densely
20-35-flowered, 80-100(-150) mm long; bracts green at
base but dry and brown above, leathery, oblong, outer
bracts 7-10 mm long, acute, inner bracts 8-1 1 mm long,
obtuse. Flowers zygomorphic, yellow, three lower tepals
each flushed maroon in lower half and with darker medi-
an streak, producing strong, acrid or musty scent; peri-
anth tube 2-5 mm long; tepals unequal, dorsal slightly
larger, margins crisped or undulate, base of lower tepals
and mouth of tube minutely papillate, dorsal tepal
ascending and erect to slightly recurved above, narrowly
oblanceolate, obtuse, 14-16 x 3-4 mm, upper laterals
spreading horizontally, strongly clawed and recurved
above, claw involute, 2-4 mm long, blade oblanceolate
to obovate, obtuse, 7-9 x 2-3 mm, lower 3 tepals fused
to one another for 1.0- 1.5 mm, with or without short,
chanelled claw to 1.5 mm long, blade oblong, truncate,
9-10 X 2.0—4. 5 mm. Filaments arcuate but later erect,
6-7 mm long, base of median filament minutely papil-
late; anthers yellow, 3 mm long with short apiculus 0.5
mm long. Ovary ellipsoid, ± 4 mm long; style ± 9 mm
long, dividing opposite anther bases, branches ultimately
1 mm long. Capsule ovoid to broadly ellipsoid, inflated,
23-28 mm long. Seeds tetrahedral, 10-12 x 10 mm, red-
dish brown, winged on angles and conspicuously crested
on faces. Flowering time: December. Figure 1.
Distribution and biology. Tritoniopsis bicolor has
been collected only once from the Bredasdorp Moun-
tains on the summit plateau west of Normanskop (Figure
2), flowering in the late spring after a fire the previous
summer. The plants are restricted to seasonally water-
logged flats where they are fairly common growing in
deep, humus-enriched sands. The smaller, cream-flow-
ered species, T. unguicularis (Lam.) G.J. Lewis, occupies
the adjacent drier, rocky slopes and the occasional hybrid
plant was recorded at the interface between the popula-
tions. A few plants of T. parviflora (Jacq.) G.J. Lewis
were found in fruit within a few hundred metres of the
locality, also on drier slopes. Several individuals of the
solitary bee Amegilla spilostoma (Apidae: Anthophori-
nae) were seen and captured while they visited flowers of
T. bicolor.
History, this species was brought to our attention by a
local botanist. Nick Helme, who collected it during a
survey of portion of the Farm Pofadderskloof.
Diagnosis and relationships: T. bicolor is most likely
to be confused with T. parviflora and the two are clearly
closely related. The flowers in both species are moderate-
ly-sized with a musky to acrid scent and are coloured
bright yellow with the lower tepals prominently marked
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Tritoniopsis bicolor. O; T. flava. •; and
T. toximontana. ▲. in Western Cape.
and flushed with maroon; the floral tube in both species is
very short; the base of the tepals and mouth of the tube are
minutely papillate; and the capsules of both species are
conspicuously inflated. Tritoniopsis pan’iflora differs in
its more prominently bilabiate flowers in which the lower
three tepals are joined together in a distinct palate, 3—4
mm long, and in its much longer filaments, 12-14 mm
long, that arch well over the lower lip. In T. bicolor the
lower tepals are joined together for l.(3-L5 mm without
forming a well-defined lower lip and the anthers are held
much closer to the mouth of the tube on short filaments
6-7 mm long. Tritoniopsis bicolor is distinctive in its
leaves, which have a conspicuous semiterete pseudopeti-
ole. 30-35 mm long, expanding abruptly into a narrowly
lanceolate blade, 6-10 mm wide. The leaves of T. parx’i-
flora are linear or linear-lanceolate, 2-5 mm wide and
although narrowed below are not contracted into a dis-
tinct pseudopetiole. The seeds of T. bicolor, measuring
10-12 mm long, also seem to be slightly larger than those
of T. par\'iflora, which never exceed 9 mm in length.
Both species are restricted to acidic soils derived from
sandstone rocks of the Table Mountain Series and
although they both appear to flower only after a burn,
they differ markedly in other aspects of their ecology and
pollination biology. Tritoniopsis pan’iflora is widespread
on dry, stony slopes in shallow sandy soils, from
Citrusdal in the north to Bredasdorp in the south. It is
unique among African Iridaceae in secreting floral oils
from epithelial elaiophores on the perianth. Oil secretion
is an adaptation to pollination by the large oil-collecting
bee Rediviva gigas (Mellittidae) (Manning & Goldblatt
in press) which has been captured while visiting and pol-
linating flowers of T. parviflora. Tritoniopsis bicolor,
however, is restricted to a seasonally waterlogged site on
the plateau of the Bredasdorp Mountains where it grows
in deep, humus-enriched sands (pH 4.5). It is pollinated
by the nectar-collecting bee Amegilla spilostoma. T.
bicolor is evidently a local segregate of T. pan’iflora that
has speciated on the specialised, seepage habitat on the
Bredasdorp Mts at the extreme southern limits of the
range of T. pan’iflora. The papillae on the palate and
mouth of the tube that characterise both T. bicolor and T.
parviflora are unique in the genus and are a significant
synapomorphy for them. While the papillae are function-
178
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
al in oil secretion in T. paniflora, tests for floral oils in
T. bicolor proved negative or at most equivocal. This
suggests that the secretory function of the papillae has
been suppressed in T. bicolor and that they remain as
vestiges of an evolutionary origin from 71 parx’iflora. It is
possibly significant in this context that Rediviva gigas is
not known from south of Kleinmond (Whitehead &
Steiner 1993) and is therefore apparently absent from the
Bredasdorp Mts. A few plants of 71 parviflora with well-
developed fruits were, however, collected within a few
hundred metres of the population of 71 bicolor indicating
that a pollinating agent was active at the locality. Given
the similarity in floral form between the two species it is
likely that Amegilla spilostoma visits both species, but
the difference in flowering time between the two at this
locality prevents any possible hybridization.
Tritoniopsis flava J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp.
nov., plantae 500-600 mm altae eramosae, cormo glo-
boso 20-35 mm diam. tunicis fibris rubro-brunneis dense
implexis, foliis 10, inferioribus 7 basalibus viridis ad
tempore floredi in pseudopetiolum complanatum infime
contractis, lamina anguste lanceolata 130-190 x (3-)5-8
mm prominente 2-3-nervata, foliis caulinis 3 supernis
duobus squamosis inferno ad 60 mm longo vaginante,
spica ± 25-flora, bracteis ovatis obtusis viridibus infime
siccis brunneisque superne, externa 6-9 mm longa, inter-
na 7-10 mm longa, floribus zygomorphis probabiliter
odoris flavis tepalibus tribus infemis pallide flavis in
medio marroninus striatis, perianthii tubo 4-5 mm longo,
tepalis inaequalibus anguste unguiculatis dorsale 15-16
X 6 mm oblanceolato infime perangusto inferioribus
tribus ± 2.5 mm connatis infime laminis ±10x6 mm, fil-
amentis ± 10 mm longis, antheris ± 5 mm longis apiculis
± 0.5 mm longis ferentibus, styli ramis ± 1 mm longis ad
apicem dilatatis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3418 (Simonstown): Kogel-
berg State Forest, along footpath and next to stream,
(-BD), 10 Dec. 1991, Kruger 147 (NBG, holo.).
Plants 500-600 mm high. Conns globose, 20-35 mm
diam., tunics of densely matted reddish brown fibres
with short neck. Leaves 10, lower 7 basal, green at flow-
ering, narrowed into flattened pseudopetiole below,
blade narrowly lanceolate, 130-190 x (3-)5-8 mm,
acuminate, with 2 or 3 main veins, cauline leaves 3 but
upper 2 scarcely evident and represented by minute
scales, lowermost reddish brown, lanceolate, up to 60
mm long, clasping throughout. Stem robust, decurved
slightly just above ground level, unbranched, 4-5 mm
diam. near base. Spike densely ± 25-flowered, 150-180
mm long; bracts green at base but dry and brown above,
rigid and leathery but papery along margins, ovate, outer
bracts 6-9 mm long, obtuse, inner bracts 7-10 mm long,
obtuse. Flowers zygomorphic, yellow, three lower tepals
each paler towards base with small maroon median
streak in lower third; perianth tube slightly curved and
widening to throat, 4-5 mm long; tepals unequal, dorsal
slightly larger, oblanceolate and strongly narrowed in
lower third, obtuse, 15-16 x 6 mm, upper laterals
clawed, claw channelled, 5 mm long, blade obovate,
obtuse, 8-9 x 5 mm, lower 3 tepals fused to one another
for ± 2.5 mm, strongly clawed, claws channelled, 2 mm
long, blades obovate-pandurate, truncate, ± 10x6 mm.
Filaments arcuate but later recurving, ± 10 mm long;
anthers yellow, ± 5 mm long with short apiculus 0.5 mm
long. Ovary ellipsoid, ± 4 mm long; style ± 9 mm long,
dividing opposite anther bases, branches 1 mm long,
expanded apically. Capsule and seeds unknown.
Flowering time: December.
Distribution and biology: Tritoniopsis flava is known
from a single population in the Palmiet River Valley
(Figure 2). The plants grow in seasonally damp soils
along a stream and flower only in the season following a
burn. The vegetation at the site regenerates rapidly and
within a few seasons the area is covered with a dense
growth of woody vegetation.
History: this enigmatic species is known from a single
collection made in 1999 during a survey of the flora of
the Kogelberg Biosphere Reserve. The plants appeared
along a small tributary of the Palmiet River following a
fire and have not been seen since. The vegetation across
the Palmiet River from this site burned in the summer of
2000 but several visits to apparently similar streams
opposite the original site failed to rediscover the species.
Diagnosis and relationships: T flava is one of a small
group of closely allied species that includes 71 caledo-
nensis (R.C. Foster) G.J.Fewis, 71 unguicularis, 71 pand-
flora and 71 bicolor. The alliance is characterised by rel-
atively small, fragrant, cream-coloured to yellow flowers
with abruptly clawed tepals in which the claws are chan-
nelled or involute, and by the short style branches. The
species are distinguished on details of flower colour, size
and proportions, and by leaf shape and venation. The
alliance is restricted to the mountains of the southwest-
ern Cape between the Cederberg and Bredasdorp. 71
flava is most likely to be confused with 71 parviflora or
71 bicolor on account of the size of its flowers but is dis-
tinguished from these species by its robust habit, nar-
rowly lanceolate leaves mostly 5-8 mm wide with 2 or 3
main veins, and by the lack of extensive maroon col-
oration on the lower tepals. It also lacks the papillate
mouth of the tube and palate that characterises the flow-
ers of these two species. All three of these species appear
to flower only in the season following a summer burn.
Tritoniopsis toximontana J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt, sp. nov., plantae 300-650 mm altae usitate
eramosae vel 1-2-ramosae, cormo globoso 30-50 mm
diam. tunicis fibris dense implexis rubrobrunneis confer-
to, foliis 4 vel 5 inferioribus 1-2 basalibus siccis ad tem-
pore florendi in pseudopetiolum teretem 100-150 mm
longum abrupte infime contractis, lamina linearo-lanceo-
lata 200-300 x 5-10 mm prominente trinervata, foliis
caulinis 3 vaginantibus omnino, spica 5-9-flora, bracteis
viridibus infime siccis roseis superne, externa 10-12 mm
longa acuta, interna 14-16 mm longa acuminata, floribus
zygomorphis inodoris pallide roseis tepalibus inferne
albis atrorubrisque notatis basibus filamentarum et ore
tubi atrorubris coloratis, perianthii tubo 20-21 mm
longo, tepalis inaequalibus dorsale 23-25 x 7-9 mm
inferioribus tribus 22-25 mm longis infime 5-6 mm con-
natis, filamentis 13-15 mm longis, antheris 7-8 mm
longis apiculis ± 2 mm longis usitate bifurcatis feren-
tibus, styli ramis 3-4 mm longis ad apicem parum
dilatatis.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
179
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp):
Gifberg, near top of pass, sheltered sandstone slope in
arid fynbos, (-DD), 22 Mar. 2000, Manning 2234 (NBG,
holo.; K, PRE, iso.).
Plants 300-650 mm high. Corm globose, 30-50 mm
diam., tunics of densely matted reddish brown fibres
with thick neck to 150 mm long. Leaves 4 or 5, the
lower 1 or 2 basal, dry at flowering, contracted abruptly
into slender, terete pseudopetiole 100-150 mm long,
blade linear-lanceolate, 200-300 x 5-10 mm, attenuate,
oblique at base, with 3 main veins, abaxial vein diverg-
ing first, cauline leaves 3, reddish brown, lanceolate,
clasping throughout, lowermost to 60 mm long, upper
reduced and bract-like. Stem slender, straight or slightly
flexuose, usually unbranched, rarely with one or two
single-flowered branches; branches filiform and
suberect. Spike laxly 5-9{-12)-flowered, 300-600 mm
long, lateral spikes 1 -flowered; bracts green at base but
dry and flushed pink in upper half at flowering, soft and
more or less membranous, oblong, outer bracts 10-12
mm long, acute, inner bracts 14-16 mm long, acumi-
nate. Flowers zygomorphic, unscented, pale pink, three
lower tepals each with dark red median streak outlined
in white and flanked at base by dark pink streak, upper
laterals usually with darker median streak near apices,
mouth of tube and bases of filaments flushed dark red;
perianth tube straight or slightly curved, very slightly
widened to throat. 20-21 mm long; tepals unequal, dor-
sal slightly ascending and recurved above, others direct-
ed forward below and recurved above, dorsal largest,
oblanceolate, 23-25 x 7-9 mm, narrowed below, upper
laterals 22-25 x 3. 5-5.0 mm. lower tepals as long as
upper laterals but usually slightly narrower, fused to one
another for 5-6 mm. Filaments arcuate but later recurv-
ing, 13-15 mm long; anthers purple. 7-8 mm long
including recurved, usually bifid apiculus ± 2 mm long.
Ovary ellipsoid, ± 4 mm long; style 35-37 mm long,
dividing slightly beyond anther apices, branches ulti-
mately 3-4 mm long, slightly expanded apically.
Capsule ovoid to ellipsoid, somewhat inflated, 15-23
mm long. Seeds tetrahedral, ±6x4 mm, reddish brown,
winged on angles and rugose on faces. Flowering time:
March to early May. Figure 3.
Distribution and biology: Tritoniopsis toximontana is
known only from the Gifberg and Matsikamma
Mountains (Figure 2), where it is quite common in arid
fynbos on the summit plateau, although apparently
absent from the highest reaches of the Matsikamma. It is
possible that the species extends northwards along the
Bokkeveld Mountains but a search there in March 2000,
failed to discover the species. The plants grow tightly
wedged among sandstone boulders in sheltered situa-
tions, often on cooler slopes. The leaves are dry at flow-
ering time or sometimes those of the next season’s
growth are emergent.
The pink, long-tubed perianth with dark red throat and
tepal markings of T. toximontana are typical of plants
adapted to pollination by long-proboscid nemestrinid
and tabanid flies in South Africa (Goldblatt & Manning
2000b). The floral tube is shorter than is usual among
such plants, however, and T. toximontana is visited and
pollinated by bees in the genus Amegilla (Apidae:
Anthophorinae) as well as a moderate-sized nemestrinid
fly in the genus Prosoeca (unpublished observations).
The nemestrinid was also observed visiting the pink
flowers of Brunsvigia striata in the same area. Both of
these plant species appear to belong to an autumn-flow-
ering guild that is pollinated by this as yet unnamed
species of long-proboscid fly.
Historyr the species was first collected by Nan
Horrocks, an assistant in the Compton Herbarium, in
1965, several years after Lewis’ revision of the genus
(Lewis 1959). Although Lewis subsequently saw this
collection, she identified it as T. ramosa var. unguicula-
ta (Baker) G.J. Lewis, apparently on the basis of the long
perianth tube. Tritoniopsis toximontana was collected
only twice in the thirty years following Lewis’ death in
1967. The most recent collection, by Cape Town envi-
ronmentalist and botanist Nick Helme, alerted us to the
fact that it represented an undescribed species. Trito-
niopsis toximontana is quite common on the Gifberg
plateau and its late flowering habit must account for the
fact that it has not been collected more frequently from a
locality that is relatively well-visited by botanists.
Diagnosis and relationships: the long-tubed pink
flowers of T toximontana are superficially similar to
those of T revoluta (Burm.f.) Goldblatt and T flexuosa
(L.f.) G.J. Lewis but these species are both characterised
by large, usually firm floral bracts, 15-35 mm long. The
bracts of T toximontana are softer and membranous and
only 12 — 15 mm long. Although the leaves in most
species of Tritoniopsis are narrowed towards the base of
the blade into a flattened pseudopetiole, there are only
four in which the pseudopetiole is terete and completely
lacking in marginal flanges of blade tissue. This shared
character seems to indicate that T burchellii (N.E.Br.)
Goldblatt, T. triticea (Burm.f.) Goldblatt, T flexuosa and
T toximontana comprise a monophyletic group. How-
ever. the differences between the species in bract shape
and texture, and particularly in the form of the cauline
leaves suggests that this relationship, if correct is not a
close one. The closely related red-flowered T. burchellii
and T triticea are unusual in the genus in their aristate
cauline leaves and small, woody capsules and cannot be
confused with any other species. Among the pink-flow-
ered species with terete leaf bases, T toximontana differs
from T flexuosa not only in the bracts but also in the leaf
The leaf blade in T flexuosa is unique in the genus in
being oblong and at most 60 mm in length, whereas the
blade in T toximontana is narrowly lanceolate-attentuate
and 200-300 mm long.
Additional material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Matsikamma
Mountains. Op de Berg 314, just west of Kdelkop Trig Beacon, (-DB),
1 Apr. 1997, Helme 1254 (NBG); Gifberg Mtn top. (-DD), 7 May
1965. Horrocks 205 (NBG); 12.7 km from Zandkraal turnoff at top of
Gifberg Pass, (-DD), 30 Mar. 1982, Snijman 595 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Nick Helme for bringing two of the
new species to our attention, Mark and Ameida Johns for
180
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
FIGURE 3. — Tritoniopsis toximon-
tana. A, conn; B, flowering
spikes and leaves. C. D,
flower: C, front view; D, half
flower. E. capsules; E, seed.
Scale bars: A-E, 10 mm; F, 5
mm. Artist: John Manning.
help in the field, and to both the Western Cape Nature
Conservation Board and the Northern Cape Nature
Conservation Service for collecting permits.
REFERENCES
BOLUS, L. 1929. Plants — new and noteworthy. South African
Gardenin!> & Country Life 19: 123.
GOLDBLA'IT. P. 1990. Status of the southern African Anapalina and
Antholyza (Iridaceae) genera, based solely on characters for
bird pollination, and a new species of Tritoniopsis. South
African Journal of Botany 56: 577-582.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000a. Cape plants. A conspec-
tus of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000b. The long-proboscid fly
pollination system in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 87: 146-170.
GOLDBLATT, R, BERNHARDT, P, & MANNING, J.C. 2000.
Adaptive radiation of pollination mechanisms in the African
genus Ixia (Iridaceae: Crocoideae). Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 89: 564—577.
LEWIS, G.J. 1959. South African Iridaceae. The genus Tritoniopsis.
Journal of South African Botany 25: 319-355.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
181
LEWIS, G.J. 1960. South African Iridaceae. The genus Anapalina.
Journal of South African Botany 26: 51-72.
MANNING, J, & GOLDBLATT, P. In press. The pollination of
Tritoniopsis parviflora (Iridaceae) by the oil-collecting bee
Rediviva gigas (Hymenoptera: Melittidae): the first record of oil-
secretion in African Iridaceae. South African Journal of Botany.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants,
edn 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No.
25.
WHITEHEAD, V.B & STEINER, K.E. 1993. A new Rediviva bee
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Melittidae) that collects oil from
orchids,. African Entomology I: 159-166.
Bothalia 31,2: 183-187 (2001)
Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from
southern Africa. 2. The genus Riccardia and its type species, R. multi-
fida, with confirmation of its presence in the region
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aneuraceae, Riccardia Gray, Riccardiaceae, R. midtifida (L.) Gray, R. saccatiflora (Steph.) S.W.Amell, southern Africa, type species
ABSTRACT
A generic description of Riccardia Gray is presented, as well as confirmation of the local presence of its type species,
R. midtifida (L.) Gray, which is described and illustrated. Amell (1952; 1963) incoiTectly identified his collections of this
species as R. saccatiflora (Steph.) S.W.Amell; some notes on it are added.
INTRODUCTION
In my previous account of the Aneuraceae (Perold
2001), I distinguished between the two locally occurring
genera, Aneitra Dumort. and Riccardia Gray, and briefly
traced the taxonomic history of the family in our region,
as well as that of the areas to the north. Short descriptions
of the family and the genus Aneitra were presented, as
well as a detailed description and an illustration of A.
pingiiis (L.) Dumort.
In the present publication a short account of the genus
Riccardia is given, as well as a detailed description and
illustration of R. midtifida (L.) Gray. Lehmann (1829)
had previously reported the presence of this species and
two of its varieties on Table Mountain, and Gottsche et
al. (1844-1847: 788) mentioned its occurrence at the
Cape. Arnell ( 1952, 1963), however, did not allude to it
at all, having misidentified his collections of it as R. sac-
catiflora. Reports of its local occurrence by Muller
(1951-1958) and by Smith (1990), were probably based
on Lehmann’s work and the brief reference to it by
Gottsche et al.
Riccardia Gray, A natural arrangement of British
plants: 679, 683 (1821) as ‘Riccardiiis’, correction by
Trevis.: 785 (1874) to 'Riccardia'-, Hewson: 75 (1970);
Brown & Braggins: 25 (1989); Luruki: 323 (1991);
R.M.Schust.: 579 (1992); Baton: 540 (1999); Bednarek-
Ochyra et al.: 178 (2000). Lectotype: Riccardia midtifi-
da (L.) Gray {Jimgermannia multiflida L.).
Synonyms are given in Hewson ( 1970); Brown & Braggins (1989)
and R.M. Schust. ( 1992).
Thalli prostrate to ascending, pale to dark green, cell
walls sometimes turning brown, rather delicate, somewhat
fleshy or not, short or long, length up to 40 mm, sometimes
more, narrow, 0.5-2.0 mm wide, lingulate to linear, apices
truncate, rounded or emarginate, margins obtuse to acute.
Branching lateral, pinnate to quadripinnate, rarely multipin-
nate, stolons sometimes present. Dorsal epidermal cells
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received; 2001-07-02.
thin-walled, smaller than internal cells. Oil bodies 1-3 in
each epidemial cell, sometimes more, rarely absent, ovoid,
spherical or ellipsoid, 12.5-22.5 x 10.0-12.5 pm, also pre-
sent, although larger, in internal cells, composed of numer-
ous fine globules, opaque, black or brown. Cross section of
branches plano-convex, biconvex or concavo-convex,
rarely circular, 3-9 cells thick medianly, at mai'gins acute to
winged or not. Mucilage papillae ventral, in 2 acropetal
rows, one on each side of midline and at branch apices.
Rliizoids usually present, numerous on ventral surface, uni-
cellulai'. Ase.xiial reproduction by 2-celled gemmae, endoge-
nously produced by epidermal cells, frequently present.
Monoicous, dioicous or synoicous. Male branches
lateral on main axis or on pinnae/primary branches, linear
to ligulate, sometimes in sympodial clusters, antheridia
in 2 regular rows, in chambers usually separated by uni-
stratose cell walls, dorso-lateral wing up to 8 cells wide.
Female branches short, lateral on main axis or on pinnae,
archegonia in 2 rows, protected by fringe of finger-like
or lamellate paraphyses. Shoot-calyptra large and fleshy,
up to ± 5 mm long, 0.7-1 . 1 mm wide, wall 5 or more cell
layers thick, surface smooth to rough, apical cells, i.e.
corona, poorly to well developed. Seta in cross section
with 4 inner and 12 outer cell rows (4 cells diam.).
Capsule ellipsoidal, 4-valved, wall bistratose, cells of
external layer with thickenings on adaxial radial and
inner tangential walls, cells of inner layer mostly without
thickenings, although the adaxial radial wall is some-
times slightly thickened. Spores spherical, finely
scabrate, small, 9-15 pm diam. Elaters 120-350 pm
long, 8-10 pm wide, unispiral.
The genus Riccardia, was named in honour of Vincento
Riccardi, a resident of Llorence during the early years of
the 18th century, and a donor to Micheli’s (1729) Nova
plantaruni genera.
Riccardia multiflda (L.) Gray, A natural arrange-
ment of British plants 1: 684 (1821); A. Evans: 22, 23
(1937); Mull.Lrib.: 499 (1954); R.M.Schust.: 316 (1987);
R.M.Schust.: 618 (1992); Baton: 541 (1999). Type: Europe.
Aneitra midtifida Dumort.; 115 (1822); Mull.Frib.; 336 (1908);
Macvicar; 54 (1926).
3 mm
184
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
RGURE 1. — Riccardia multifida. A, thallus with axis and lateral branches, 2- or 3-pinnate; B, median dorsal epidermal cells (solid lines) of ultimate
.segment of axis without oil bodies, but present in large subdorsal cells (stippled lines); C, ultimate pinnule, some marginal cells with oil bodies,
medianly opaque; D, margin of ultimate pinnule, oil bodies mostly absent in outer, but present in inner cell rows; E, F, c/s axis at ± middle of
ultimate segment; G-J, c/s ultimate pinnules; K, ventral surface of part of pinnule, with mucilage papillae at apex. L, M, antheridial branch: L,
from above; M, c/s. N, synoicous branch; O, gynoecial branch with paraphyses; P, Q, calyptra: Q, c/s wall. R, c/s seta; S, capsule with 4 dehisced
valves. T-V, valve: T, cells of epidermal layer in external longitudinal view; U, cells of inner layer in internal longitudinal view; V, c/s part of
bistratose wall (thickenings partly after Evans 1937). Wall: mw, median; ot, outer tangential; it, inner tangential; adr, adaxial radial; abr, abaxial
radial. W1 , W2, spores; X, elater. PeroU & Koekemoer 4449-4452-. A, C, F-M, P, W1 , W2, X, 4449; B, 4452; D, R, 4450; E, N, O, Q, S-V, 4451.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
185
Jimgermannia midtifida L.; 1136 (1753).
For a complete list of synonyms, Schuster ( 1992) may be consulted.
Thalli prostrate to suberect, in loosely or densely over-
lying and intricately intertwining mats, rather light green,
sometimes at maturity cell walls brown, opaque, with nar-
row, translucent margins (Figure lA); when dry, dark
green; medium-sized to large, flat and flabellate above.
Main axis dorsally plane to convex or slightly concave,
often retaining its dominance, up to 27 mm long, 0.82-1 .05
mm wide, apically rounded or slightly emarginate. evenm-
ally narrowing somewhat toward base, margins acute and
unistratose for a width of 1 or 2 cells. Primary branches
lateral, opposite or subopposite, 0.8-1. 4 mm between suc-
cessive ones, obliquely spreading, often overlapping, regu-
larly pinnate with pinnae well developed, linear, distally
with 2 or 3 paired pinnules, proximally with 4 or some-
times even 5 paired pinnules, older, primary branches/pin-
nae up to 4.7 mm long, 590-650 pm wide, secondary
branches/pinnules 0.75-1.6 mm long, 475-530 pm wide;
from base of main axis or from apices of secondary branch-
es, flagelliform branches sometimes produced. Dorsal epi-
dermal cells in median part of apical segment of main axis
(Figure IB), from above 5-7-sided, thin-walled,
62.5- 105.0 X 25.0-37. 5(-55.0) pm, subdorsal cells larger,
4—7-sided, 155.0-262.5 x 62.5-87.5 pm, subventral cells
170.0-237.5 X 60-85 pm, ventral epidermal cells 75-100
X 30.0-47.5 pm. Oil bodies rare or absent in dorsal and
ventral epidermal cells, absent in up to 70% of marginal
cells, present in internal cells, 1 or occasionally 2 per cell,
15-25 X 7.5-12.5 pm, subspherical, ellipsoidal or ovoid,
with rounded ends, light brown, opaque, composed of
numerous small globules. Margins of ultimate pinnules
crenulate (Figures 1C, D; 2A), outer cells smaller than
intramarginal ones, from above 35-55 x 35.0-47.5 pm, ±
subquadrate, with free walls bulging, intramarginal cells
often obliquely orientated, polygonal, 72.5-100.0 x
47.5- 52.5 pm, generally with 1 oil body each. Cross sec-
tion of main axis at middle of ultimate segment (Figure IE,
F) plano-convex, or weakly concavo-convex, sometimes
biconvex, 180 pm or 6(7) cell rows thick medianly, gradu-
ally tapering to unistratose margins, 1 or 2 cells wide, dor-
sal cells ± 27.5 pm thick, internal cells 37.5-50.0 pm thick;
cross section of ultimate pinnule of primary branch (Figure
IG-J ) 100 pm or 3 or 4 cells thick medianly, pellucid, unis-
tratose margins 2 or 3 cells wide. Mucilage papillae ventral
(Figure IK), clustered at slightly emarginate apex of
branch and in 2 spaced, acropetal rows, one on either side
of midline, 300-360 pm between successive ones, reddish,
club-shaped, 2-celled. above 45.0-62.5 x 25.0-32.5 pm,
narrowing to inconspicuous basal cell, non-persistent.
Rhizoids ventral on axes, sometimes also on pinnae, hya-
line, 7.5-15.0 pm wide. Asexual reproduction by gemmae
seemingly absent.
Heteroicous, with male, female and rarely synoicous
branches. Antheridial branches lateral, near base of pri-
mary pinnae, on one or both sides, occasionally at tips
of secondary pinnules, oblong-linear (Figure IL), ± 700
pm long, 350 pm wide, in cross section 240 pm high
(Figure IM), margins crenulate, with single, erect layer
of swollen cells, 62.5-77.5 x 45-50 pm, bearing 5 or
more pairs of antheridia, separated by unistratose cell
layer; very rarely synoicous (Figure IN), basally with
paired antheridia and apically with a few archegonia and
FIGURE 2. — Riccardia multifida: A, pinnule (living), with outwardly
bulging marginal cells along both margins; B, fully rehydrated
pinnule, (collected 1951), with marginal cells not bulging out-
wardly. R. saccatiflora: C, fully rehydrated pinnule (collected
late 1800s), with much smaller marginal cells not bulging out-
wardly, only one margin shown. A, Perold & Koekemoer 4449\
B, S.W.Amell 1952 (S); C, Rodriguez G10699 (G). A-C, x 1 14.
short, laciniate cilia at tip. Gynoecial branches short,
arising opposite base of primary branch on main axis,
or toward base of main axis, sometimes toward middle
of primary branch, between pinnae of 1st and 2nd
186
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
orders, or between pinnae of 2nd and 3rd orders; para-
physes between and surrounding archegonia (Figure
10), up to 437.5 pm long, composed of single strands of
9 or more cells, joined end to end; sometimes up to 3
female branches in a sympodial cluster. Calyptra
(Figure IP) clavate, 3. 2-5. 3 x 0.7-1. 1 mm, cross section
of wall up to 225 pm or 4-6 cells thick (Figure IQ), out-
ermost row with scattered, thick-walled papillae, 65-90
X 25-65 pm, extending upwards to apex, where they are
grouped together, forming a corona. Seta ± 12 mm long,
± 280 pm wide, with 4 inner and 12 outer cell rows, i.e.
4 cells diam. (Figure IR). Capsule ± cylindrical,
1200-1450 pm long, with 4 dehisced valves (Figure
IS) , 320-375 pm or 12-15 cells wide, bistratose; cells
of epidermal layer in external longitudinal view (Figure
IT) , 100.0-142.5 X 25-35 pm, with straight or oblique
end walls, and strong nodular thickenings; in cross sec-
tion (Figure IV) cells ± rectangular in shape, thicken-
ings on adaxial radial (adr) and inner tangential (it)
walls sometimes extending slightly to outer tangential
(ot) walls, mostly bands on one side of median wall
(mw) alternating with those on the other side, i.e. form-
ing a mirror image; inner cells in internal longitudinal
view (Figure lU), 1 12.5-132.5 x 25-35 pm, never with
nodular thickenings; in cross section (Figure IV) cells
faintly thickened on adaxial radial (adr) and sometimes
extending slightly on inner tangential (it) walls. Spores
(Figure IWl, W2) 15-20 pm diam., translucent, finely
scabrate, pinkish, with inner, iiregularly shaped, green
areas. Elaters (Figure IX) 245-390 pm long, 10-14 pm
wide, with single spiral band, tapering to unspiralled
tips. Elaterophores at valve apices (Figure IS), in per-
sistent tufts. Chromosome no.: n = 20.
Riccardia midtifida is a widespread species or species
complex which Schuster (1992) says, extends from the
northern Spruce-Fir zone southwards. According to
Schuster, two subspecies occur in North America, i.e. R.
midtifida subsp. midtifida, with a more northerly range
along the western states, and R. midtifida subsp. synoica
with a more southerly range along the eastern states.
Apart from occupying a different geographical range, the
latter subspecies is also distinguished from the former
autoicous one, by most of its inflorescences being bisex-
ual and by its preference for growing on rotting wood. R.
midtifida subsp. midtifida is further known from
Newfoundland, Greenland, Iceland, British Isles,
Macaronesia, Europe, North Africa, Madagascar,
Sikkim-Himalaya, West Java (Meijer 1959) and China
(Yunnan). Another subspecies, R. midtifida subsp. de-
crescens, is reported from Japan by Furuki (1991).
Reports of R. midtifida from the Falklands have been
excluded according to Engel (1990). As far as is known,
it also does not occur in Australia, New Zealand or in
South America, although there is an unconfirmed report
from the Andes (Gottsche 1864). Muller (1951-1958)
remarked that, ‘Die Angaben von der sudlichen Hemi-
sphare gehdren aber vielleicht nicht zu R. midtifida.'
Wigginton & Grolle (1996) also do not include it in their
Catalogue of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of suh-
Saharan Africa. Jones (1956), however, observed that a
specimen collected from the ‘Foresta di Tusu, Mt Kenya’
and described by Gola (1914), appeared to him to be
identical with R. midtifida. Schuster (1992), on the other
hand, thinks that R. midtifida may be the only Riccardia
species with a reasonably certain bipolar range, as a col-
lection from Campbell Island, south of New Zealand,
differs only slightly from holarctic plants, although he
concedes that it needs more study.
Schuster (1992), with his extensive knowledge and
customary astuteness, expressed the opinion that, of the
species that Arnell (1952, 1963) reported from South
Africa, R. saccatiflora ‘seems virtually inseparable from
R. midtifida'. After thorough examination of Arnell’s
collections, I share this view, although it must be admit-
ted that Arnell’s drawings do not show the regular bi- and
tripinnate branching generally exhibited by R. midtifida.
However, the narrow translucent margins of the ultimate
pinnules of his specimens are conspicuous (Figure 2B),
and may have misled him into thinking he was dealing
with R. saccatiflora. Otherwise, it is surprising that Arnell
made this mistake, as he should have been familiar with
R. midtifida, having treated it for the Illustrated moss
flora of Eennoscandia (Arnell 1956).
Study of the type and five other Rodriguez collections
of R. saccatiflora from Reunion (Bourbon), as well as
Stephani’s leones (1985) nos. 000229 and 000230,
showed that the unistratose marginal cells of the ultimate
pinnules form a distinct wing, but are small (Figure 2C);
they measure 27.5-32.5(-45.0) x 10-20(-35) pm, where-
as the intramarginal cells are only slightly larger,
37.5^2.5 X 25-30 pm. In cross section the ultimate pin-
nules are 4 or 5 cell layers or 100 pm thick medianly and
the main axes 8 cell rows or 300 pm thick. Stephani
(1890) referred to the marginal cells as ‘multo-minores’.
Arnell (1963) reported the oil bodies of his ‘/?. saccat-
iflora' collections to be ‘dark, large, composed of very
small droplets, one per cell’. In their examination of R.
saccatiflora specimens, Meenks & Poes (1985) found
that their oil body data agreed well with Amell’s observa-
tions, but added that the oil bodies seem ‘rather persistent,
since they still occur in some older herbarium collec-
tions’. This is not the case in R. midtifida, where the oil
bodies are not persistent. Meenks & Poes (1985) only cite
the literature records from South Africa given by Arnell
(1963: 92). Their reports of R. saccatiflora from East
Africa are, however, accepted for the time being.
Paton (1999) states that, in British R. multifida, the
occasional synoicous inflorescence occurs on the same
thallus as unisexual and paroicous inflorescences, but
that such populations are not referable to the American
subspecies synoica R.M.Schust., in which nearly all the
inflorescences are bisexual. The same criteria apply to
the South African plants, where synoicous inflorescences
are very rare.
The new Perold & Koekemoer collections of R. multi-
fida are from Diepwalle Eorest Station, near Knysna, in
the southeastern part of Western Cape (Figure 3). This is
the same vicinity as Gouna Forest, Bracken Hill, Buffels
Nek and Garden of Eden, from where Arnell (1952)
recorded several of his so-called R. saccatiflora gather-
ings, which have now been transferred to R. multifida.
R. multifida specimens are distinguished by the fol-
lowing characters: 1, the thalli are markedly feathery,
with rather crowded and generally very regular, pinnate
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
187
branching; 2, the ultimate and lateral pinnules are thin,
linear and paralled-sided, with the outer 3 cell rows unis-
tratose and translucent on either side of the thicker,
opaque, median region; 3, the ultimate pinnules have
crenulate distal margins, with the marginal cells bulging
externally and smaller than the intramarginal cells; 4, the
oil bodies are mostly absent from the marginal and epi-
dermal cells of the median region, but present in the inter-
nal cells; 5, the epidermal cells of the median part are
generally narrower than in allied species, i.e. 25.0-37. 5(-
55.0) pm wide; 6, the plants are rarely synoicous.
ECOLOGY
Riccardia midtifida plants grow on soil, twigs, dead
leaves or decaying wood in forested areas at streambanks
or seepages, i.e. in constantly wet or damp sites in ± dif-
fused light.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The curators of BOL. G and S are thanked for the loan
of specimens. I also express my sincere gratitude to Ms
M. Koekemoer, curator of PRE, for all her help with
fieldwork, and to the referees for their helpful sugges-
tions and advice. The artist. Ms G. Condy, the photogra-
pher, Mrs A. Romanowski and the typist, Ms D. Maree
are thanked for their valued contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL. S.W. 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa (1951).
New and little-known species. Botaniska Notiser 105; 307-315.
ARNELL. S.W. 1956. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. 1.
Hepaticae. Gleerup, Lund.
ARNELL. S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Science
Council. Stockholm.
BEDNAREK-OCHYRA. H., VANA, J., OCHYRA, R. & LEWIS
SMITH. R.I. 2000. The liverwort flora of Antarctica. Polish
Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Cracow.
BROWN, E.A. & BRAGGINS. J.E. 1989. A revision of the genus
Riccardia S.F.Gray in New Zealand with notes on the genus Anewra
Dum. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 66: 1-132.
DUMORTTER. B.C. 1822. Commentationes Botanicae. 1-117. Toumay.
ENGEL. J.J. 1990. Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Hepaticae and
Anthocerotophyta: a taxonomic and phytoeeoeraphic study.
Fieldiana 25: 1029.
EVANS, A.W. 1937. The structure of the capsule wall in certain species
of Riccardia. Annales Bryologi 10: 20-35.
FURUKI, T. 1991. A taxonomical revision of the Aneuraceae (Hepa-
ticae) of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 70:
293-397.
GOLA, G. 1914. Le epatiche della regione del Kenia. Memorie della R.
Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, ser. 2. 65: 1-11.
GOTTSCHE, C.M. 1864. Hepaticae. In Triana & Planchon, Prodromus
florae nova granatensis. Annales des sciences naturelles, bot.
set. 5, 1: 95-198.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Meissner, Hamburg.
Reprinted 1967, Cramer, Lehre.
GRAY, S.F. 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants 1: 1-824.
London.
HEWSON, H.J. 1970. The family Aneuraceae in Australia and New
Guinea: II. The genus Riccardia. Proceedings of the Linnean
Society of New South Wales 95: 60-121.
JONES, E.W. 1956. African Hepatics XL The genus Riccardia in trop-
ical Africa. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 3:
74-84.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1829. Hepaticarum capensium a C.F. Ecklon col-
lectarum brevem rescensionem. Linnaea 4: 357-371.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Salvius, Stockholm.
MACVICAR. S.M. 1926. The student's handbook of British hepatics,
edn 2. Sumfield. Eastbourne. Reprinted 1964.
MEENKS, J.L.D. & POCS, T. 1985. East African Bryophytes IX.
Aneuraceae. Abstracta Botanica 9: 79-98.
MEIJER.W. 1959. Notes on species of Riccardia from their type local-
ities in western Java. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Labo-
ratory 21: 73, 74.
MICHELL PA. 1729. Nova plantarum genera. Paperini, Florence.
MULLER, K. (Mull.Frib.) 1905-1916. Die Lebermoose Deutschlands,
Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Dr L. Rabenhorst's Krypto-
gamen-Flora 2, edn 6, part 1: 1-870. Geest & Portig, Leipzig.
MULLER. K. (Mull.Frib.) 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr
L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora 6, edn 3: 492-505. Geest
& Portig, Leipzig.
PATON, J.A. 1999. The liverwort flora of the British Isles. Harley
Books, Colchester.
PEROLD, S.M. 2001. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. I. The genus Aneura and
its local representative. Bothalia 31: 167-173.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1987. Studies on Metzgeriales: 1. North American
Aneuraceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 62:
299-329.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America 5: 1-854. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SMITH. A. J.E. 1990. The liverworts of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
STEPHANl, F. 1890. Hepaticae africanae novae in insulis Bourbon,
Maurice et Madagascar lectae. Botanical Gazette (Crawfords-
ville) 15: 281-292.
STEPHANl, F. 1985. leones hepaticarum. microfiche. Inter Documen-
tation Company, Leiden.
TREVISAN DE SAINT-LEON, V.B.A. 1874. Nuovo censo delle epatiche
italiane. Rendiconti Reale Istituto Dnnhardo di Scienze e Lettere,
Ser. 2,7: 776-786.
WIGGINTON, M.J. & GROLLE, R., Supplemented by GYARMATl,
A. 1996. Catalogue of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of sub-
Saharan Africa. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 50. Cramer, Berlin,
Stuttgart.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Riccardia midtifida
Arnell ISIS Buffels Nek, IS92», 1731 Gouna For. (BOL), 1839
Diepwalle For. Res.(BOL), 1843** (BOL. PRE), 1844* *, 184S (BOL),
1918 (PRE), 1929 (BOL), I9S2 (S), 1974 Bracken Hill For. (BOL),
2079, 2133 Garden of Eden (BOL).
Perold & Koekemoer 4449, 44S0, 44S1, 44S2, Diepwalle Forest
Reserve, Knysna District, Western Cape.
Riccardia saccatifiora
Rodriguez G010697 (G) (type specimen), G010698 (G), G010699
(G), G010700 (G), G010702 (G), G010703 (G) Bourbon (Reunion).
• on decaying wood.
* ‘A mile south of Diepwalle Forest Reserve.
Bothalia31,2: 189-212 (2001)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
IRIDACEAE
TWO NEW RENOSTERVELD SPECIES OF CROCOIDEAE FROM SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
Southern Africa and the Cape Floral Region in partic-
ular is a major centre of diversity for Iridaceae.
Approximately 70% of the species of Iridaceae recorded
from southern Africa occur in the Cape Region and most
are endemic to it (Goldblatt 1991; Goldblatt & Manning
2000). The family is especially well represented in the
west and southwest of the region, which has a true sum-
mer-dry climate (Manning et al. in press). Local ende-
mism is a common feature among the species in the
region. Iridaceae display a high degree of substrate
fidelity (Goldblatt & Manning 1996) and edaphic and
topographic diversity appear to have played a significant
role in speciation in the subcontinent (Goldblatt &
Manning 1998). Although the great majority of species
recorded from the Cape Floral Region are typically
restricted to fynbos vegetation, the vegetation type
known as renosterveld historically dominated much of
the Cape lowlands. This fine-leaved shrubland occurs on
nutrient-intermediate, fine-grained clays derived from
shales of the Malmesbury and Bokkeveld Formations
and is particularly rich in geophytic species. Now large-
ly transformed by agricultiue (Low & Rebelo 1996),
renosterveld was commonly found along the coastal
forelands as well as in inland drainage basins that are
often isolated from one another. The drainage basin of
the Breede River, which forms the region known as the
Worcester Karoo, is rich in local endemics. Among these
are Ixia collina, known only from near Aan de Dooms,
southeast of Worcester, 7. vanzijliae, distributed between
Worcester and Roberston, and Sparaxis maculosa,
restricted to the valley of the Hoeks River, a minor tribu-
tary of the Breede River, near Villiersdorp in the south-
western comer of the Worcester Karoo. Two additional
local endemics restricted to the renosterveld in this area
have since been discovered and are described here. It is
becoming evident that the Worcester Karoo, known
locally as the Bosjesveld at least since 1815 when the
explorer William Burchell recorded the name (Burchell
1822), is a distinct enclave of endemism for Iridaceae
and especially the genus Ixia. Fortunately extensive
stretches of indigenous renosterbos shrubland still
remain undisturbed in this area although it is slowly
being removed to establish orchards and vineyards.
Freesia fucata J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov.
Plantae 150-300 mm altae, cormo conico 15-20 mm
diam. tunicis pallide reticulatis, folds 5-6 inclinatis vel
suberectis linearibus 80-250 x 4-5 mm, caule usitate
ramoso minute papillate, spica inclinata 4-9-florum,
floribus (30-)35-47 mm longis fragrantibus albis
exteme atropurpureis suffusis tepalis inferioribus auran-
tiacis notatis, tubo perianthii 20-30 mm longo infime
filiforme 6-7 mm longo, tepalis inaequalibus, dorsale
grandiore suberecto ovate 11-18 x 8-11 mm, inferi-
oribus recurvatis, filamentis 13-15 mm longis, antheris
7-8 mm longis, stylo diviso prope apicem antherarum.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319, Villiersdorp Dist., 5.5
km along Doornrivier Road off Villiersdorp- Worcester
Road, Farm Die Hoek, (-CD), 10-07-2000, Manning
2271 (NBG, holo.; MO, PRE, iso.).
Plants 150-300 mm high. Conn conic, 15-20 mm
diam., tunics pale, medium-textured, reticulate, accumu-
lating with age and forming neck around base of stem.
Leaves 5 or 6, inclined to suberect, linear, tapering
above, acute, 80-250 mm long, usually about as long as
stem, 4-5 mm wide, cataphylls flushed deep purple.
Stem minutely papillate, flexed outward above upper-
most sheath and then suberect, usually with one or two
branches. Spike lightly decumbent, 4-9-flowered; bracts
soft, herbaceous, green with hyaline margins, tricuspi-
date, 6-10(-13) mm long; inner bracts slightly shorter,
forked. Flowers (30-)35-47 mm long, strongly violet-
scented, white flushed dull purple on reverse of tepals,
base of lower tepals yellow-orange with dark midline;
perianth tube 20-30 mm long with basal narrow part 6-7
mm long, widening rather abruptly into wider, flared
upper portion; tepals unequal, the dorsal largest,
suberect, ovate, 1 1-18 x 8-11 mm, upper laterals slight-
ly narrower, oblong, lower tepals recurved, lower laterals
narrowly ovate, 10-14 x 6-8 mm, lower median oblong,
10-16 X 5-6 mm. Filaments arcuate, inserted at base of
widened upper portion, included, 13-15 mm long;
anthers 7-8 mm long. Style dividing at or slightly beyond
anther apices, branches deeply forked. Capsule oblong,
three-lobed, (6-)9-12 x (6-)7-10 mm. Seeds globose
with inflated chalaza and raphe, rugose, glossy reddish
brown, 2. 5-3.0 mm diam. Flowering time: July. Figure 1.
Distribution and biology: the species is known from
several populations in the valley of the Hoeks River, in
the southwestern comer of the Worcester Karoo, south of
Villiersdorp (Figure 2). It occurs on clay soils derived
from shales of the Bokkeveld series in open shmbland
dominated by the renosterbos, Elytropappus rhinocerotis.
History: first collected at the type locality in 1975 by
the Worcester dentist, I.B. Walters, who had a keen inter-
est in the local flora and collected extensively in the
Worcester Valley, this highly fragrant species is known
only from this small area.
190
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 1. — Freesia fucata. A,
whole plant; B, flowering
spike; C, D, flower: C, front
view; D, half flower. E, outer
bract (left) and inner bract
(right); F, capsules; G, seed.
Scale bar: A-F, 10 mm; G, 1.5
mm. Artist: John Manning.
Diagnosis and relationships: F fucata has the minute-
ly papillate-puberulous stem, green bracts and narrowly
ovate lower tepals characteristic of section Viridibractea
(Goldblatt 1982). Within the section it is somewhat inter-
mediate between F. alba (G.L.Mey.) Gumbleton and F
caryophyllacea (Burm.f.) N.E.Br. It has the narrow, erect
leaves of the former and the bilabiate, white flowers
flushed with purple of the latter. F. fucata is, however,
unique in the genus in its distinctly tricuspidate outer
bracts. F. alba, which is characterized by its almost
actinomorphic perianth, is essentially a species of the
southern Cape coastal forelands, occurring along forest
margins or in open scrub in stony, sandstone-derived
soils. F. fucata and F caryophyllacea, in contrast, both
occur in renosterbos shrubland on stony clay soils. The
rather variable F. caryophyllacea typically has more or
less prostrate, usually rather broad, typically 10-16 mm
wide, lanceolate and obtuse leaves. Populations in the
west, centred around Caledon and Bredasdorp, however,
have acute and often quite long leaves, 5-9 mm wide, but
these are never as narrow or as long as in F fucata. The
Bredasdorp populations, which are found on limestone
outcrops, were regarded by Goldblatt (1982) as a distinct
species, F. elimensis L. Bolus, of possible hybrid origin
between F. alba and F. caryophyllacea. Subesquent col-
lections, however, suggest that it is no more than a local
edaphic form of F. caryophyllacea (Goldblatt &
Manning 2000). The possibility that F. fucata represents
a hybrid between F. alba and F. caryophyllacea can be
discounted since neither of the putative parents has the
curious tricuspidate outer bracts of F. fucata, nor has
either been collected in the immediate vicinity.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
191
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of both Freesia fucata and I.xia atrandra in
Western Cape.
The more common and widespread F. refracta (Jacq.)
Klatt, which is well known from the Breede River Valley,
also resembles F. fucata in its upright habit and narrow
leaves and the first collection of the new species was
assigned to it in error. F refracta is easily identified,
however, by its dry and membranous floral bracts and
smaller flowers, 25-35(^0) mm long, with the dorsal
tepal more prominent than the relatively small, cordate
lower tepals that have their margins conspicuously
curved upwards.
Additional material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): near Die Hoek. Doom-
rivier, (-CD), 23-07-1975. Walters 157 (NBG).
Ixia atrandra Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, sp. nov.
Plantae 250-500 mm altae, cormo globoso tunicis
reticulatis, folds (3)4 lanceolatis basalibus 6-10 mm
latis, caule simplice vel 1-ramoso, spica congestis
(3)4-10-florum, bracteis scariosis translucentibus 5-6
mm longis, floribus camels vel cremeis centro atrocolore
hypocrateriformibus, tubo perianthii filiforme 6-9 mm
longo, tepalis obovatis 11-14 x 6-8 mm, filamentis
2. 5-3.0 mm longis ascendentibus, antheris oblongo-
sagittatis 5-6 x 1. 5-2.0 mm thecis latrorsibus nigris,
pollinibus flavis, stylo diviso ad apicem tubi. Figure 3.
TYPE. — Western Cape, Villiersdorp Dist., about 5
km along Doomrivier Road off Villiersdorp- Worcester
Road, Farm Die Hoek, (-CD), 3-10-2000, Goldblatt 11604
(NBG, holo.; K. MO, PRE, iso.).
Plants 250-500 mm high. Corms globose, 15-20 mm
diam., tunics of medium-textured, wiry reticulate fibres.
Cataphylls membranous, upper one reaching shortly
above ground level and then flushed reddish purple.
Leaves usually 4, sometimes 3, all basal, lanceolate,
6-10 mm wide, usually reaching to about middle of
stem, uppermost leaf usually entirely sheathing, margins
and midrib hyaline, lightly thickened, plane or lightly
twisted in upper half. Stem erect, unbranched or with one
FIGURE 3. — Ixia atrandra. A, corm and leaves; B, flowering spike; C,
anthers and style branches. Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm. Artist: John
Manning.
ascending branch, 0. 5-0.8 mm diam. below base of
spike. Spike crowded, (3)4- 10- flowered; bracts scarious,
translucent, veins more or less pink above, outer 5-6 mm
long, obscurely three-dentate, inner bract about as long
as outer or slightly shorter, bicuspidate. Flowers
192
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
hypocrateriform, pink or rarely cream-coloured, lower
third of tepals yellowish or pinkish ochre-coloured with
an outer band of deep lilac, unscented; perianth tube fili-
form and clasping style for its entire length, 6-9 mm
long, widened only in upper 1 mm; tepals obovate, some-
what narrowed into short claw below, spreading with dis-
tal margins curving upward, 11-14 x 6-8 mm. Filaments
inserted at apex of tube and occluding throat, blue to
brownish, 2. 5-3.0 mm long, weakly diverging, free or
connate at base; anthers oblong-sagittate, connective
broad and thecae restricted to margins, dehiscing lateral-
ly, 5-6 X 1. 5-2.0 mm (at anthesis), initially erect, later
diverging and becoming slightly twisted, black; pollen
yellow. Ovary ovoid. 2 mm long; style straight and erect,
dividing at or just above mouth of tube, branches blue,
arching outward, 3^ mm long, ultimately reaching base
of anthers. Flowering time: late September and October.
Distribution and biology: currently known from two
populations in the valley of the Hoeks River in the south-
western corner of the Worcester Karoo (Figure 2), Ixia
atrandra grows on clay soils derived from shales of the
Bokkeveld series in open shrubland dominated by the
renosterbos, Elytropappus rliinocerotis. The flowers of I.
atrandra display the typical adaptations for pollination
by monkey beetles (Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae). These
include the congested, subcapitate inflorescence, bright-
ly coloured bowl-shaped flowers with central dark mark-
ing, lack of nectar or fragrance and dark anthers. The
broadened connectives are part of this syndrome and are
matched by remarkably similar sagittate anthers in some
beetle-pollinated species of Babiana, particularly B. vil-
losa, and B. melanops.
History: this species was first collected in October
1996 as a voucher for studies on beetle-pollination, but
the material was inadequate for formal description. A
later collection from nearby serves as source of the type
material.
Diagnosis and relationships: Ixia atrandra appears to
be most closely allied to /. rouxii G.J. Lewis, with which
it shares pink flowers with a large central stain, tepals
which are narrowed and almost clawed below and black
anthers with widened connectives. I. rouxii is restricted
to the upper reaches of the Breede River and the con-
tiguous Berg River, between Porterville and Wolseley.
An unusual feature of both species, but particularly
prominently developed in 1. atrandra, is the presence of
dark blue amber-like deposits on the anther connective.
These appear to be hardened secretions from the epider-
mis. I. atrandra differs from I. rouxii in its four (occa-
sionally three), lanceolate leaves 6-10 mm wide, typical-
ly unbranched stem (or with a single, ascending branch)
and distinctive oblong-sagittate anthers with a broad
connective about 1 .5 mm wide and the thecae dehiscing
laterally. I. rouxii typically has five to six (rarely four)
almost linear leaves 2-3(-6) mm wide and is distinctive
in its sharply spreading branches, and while the anther
connectives are widened, they are less than 1 mm wide,
and the anthers dehisce outwards. A third species with
pink or white flowers with a prominent dark centre and
black anthers, 7. versicolor G.J. Lewis, is probably also
part of this alliance. A local endemic restricted to damp,
gravelly renosterveld flats at Gordon’s Bay, it is distin-
guished from the other two species by its conspicuously
thickened, crenulate leaf margins and elliptic tepals that
are not narrowed into claws at the base. These three
species appear to be geographic segregates restricted to
lowland renosterbos shrubland.
Additional material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Brandvlei hills south of
Worcester, clay ground in renosterveld, (-DD), 26-10-1996, Goldblatt
10568 (MO).
REFERENCES
BURCHELL, W.J. 1822. Travels in the interior of southern Africa.
Reprinted in 1953 by The Batchworth Press, London.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1982. Systematics of Freesia Klatt (Iridaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 48: 39-91.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1991. An overview of the systematics, phylogeny and
biology of the African Iridaceae. Contributions from the Bolus
Herbarium 13: 1-74.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING J.C. 1996. Two new edaphic endemic
species and taxonomic changes in Gladiolus (Iridaceae) of
southern Africa, and notes on Iridaceae restricted to unusual
substrates. Novon 6: 172-180.
GOLDBLATT. P. & MANNING, J.C. 1998. Gladiolus in southern
Africa. Femwood Press, Cape Town.
GOLDBLATT. P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus
of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9.
LOW, A.B. & REBELO, A.G. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs
& Tourism, Pretoria.
MANNING, J., GOLDBLATT, P. & SNIJMAN. D. in press. Cape
bulbs and their allies. Timber Press, Oregon.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape
Town.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Garden,
PO. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2000-10-23.
HYACINTHACEAE
THE GENERIC DELIMITATION WITHIN HYACINTHACEAE, A COMMENT ON WORKS BY F. SPETA
INTRODUCTION
The definition of genera and the assignment of
species to genera within the family Hyacinthaceae, or
subfamily Scilleae of the family Liliaceae, have troubled
taxonomists since Linnaeus. The group is poor in quali-
tative characters, which has made it difficult to maintain
stable genera based on good diagnostic characters.
Species have often been moved from genus to genus
either due to different opinions on generic delimitation or
to misinterpretation of characters. Recently two works
by Speta (1998a, b) have appeared that have addressed
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
193
generic delimitation within Hyacinthaceae. The first is a
paper called ‘Systematische Analyse der Gattung Scilla
L. s.l. (Hyacinthaceae)’ (Speta 1998a), the second is the
treatment of Hyacinthaceae for ‘The families and genera
of flowering plants’ (Speta 1998b). In these works the
author has published a new generic delimitation within
the family. As I have worked on sub-Saharan genera of
Hyacinthaceae for several years (Stedje 1987, 1988,
1996. 1997, 1998, 2000; Stedje & Thulin 1995, and ref-
erences therein), both as a biosystematist, and a molecu-
lar and floristic taxonomist contributing to new floras, I
feel the need to comment on Speta’s (1998a, b) new
generic delimitations. A review of different taxonomists’
opinions on the generic delimitation of Hyacinthaceae is
given in Stedje (2001).
GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE WORKS OF SPETA ( 1998a. b)
In Speta (1998a) the family Hyacinthaceae is split
into five subfamilies of which four are new: Chloro-
galoideae Speta, Oziroeideae Speta, Urgineoideae Speta
and Omithogaloideae Speta. Of these, Oziroeideae,
Urgineoideae and Hyacinthoideae are treated further
with descriptions and species lists of selected genera.
Later DNA analysis excludes Chlorogaloideae from
Hyacinthaceae (Pfosser & Speta 1999). Oziroeideae is
confined to South America, and I will not deal with it fur-
ther here. Several of the genera in Speta (1998a) are
described as new to science. There is extensive splitting
of the ‘traditional’ genera Urginea Steinh. (or Drimia
Jacq. if a wider generic circumscription is used), Orni-
thogalum L. and Scilla L. into newly described genera or
reinstated ones. These new genera and generic reinstate-
ments are presented practically without any discussion or
justification. The groupings are said to have support in
DNA sequence data, but no cladograms or reference to
publication of these data are included. Later, in 1999, a
paper including a phylogenetic analysis of Hyacin-
thaceae based on chloroplast DNA sequences appeared
(Pfosser & Speta 1999). Unfortunately only a few sub-
Saharan species are included here, and for most genera
occurring in Africa south of the Sahara, only one species,
if any, is analysed. When two or more species are ana-
lysed. the genera are, with one exception (Drimiopsis),
para- or polyphyletic. Furthermore no diagnostic key is
provided. A key is given in Speta (1998b), but in that
work several of the genera of Speta (1998a) are not
included (see below for further comments on this issue).
The definition of the genera of Speta’s (1998a) new treat-
ment of the family Hyacinthaceae is in other words very
unclear. Unfortunately, throughout this work virtually no
discussion is given prior to his conclusions, making a
meaningful discussion between taxonomists difficult.
Furthermore, insufficient details are given of the materi-
al studied: no indication of the type of material seen,
whether herbarium specimens or living plants, or how
many specimens were studied for which species.
COMMENTS ON THE SUBFAMILY URGINEOIDEAE
The treatment of this subfamily is rather confusing.
Altogether 12 genera are listed as belonging to the sub-
family Urgineoideae in the introductory part of Speta
(1998a: 53). Two of these genera (Bowiea Hook f. and
Schizobasis Baker) are not treated further in the part con-
taining generic descriptions, while three genera are
described here under subfamily Urgineoideae, but not
listed on p. 53: the reinstated genus Fusifiliim Raf., and
the new genera Igidia Speta and Urginavia Speta. In
Speta (1998b) four of the genera of Speta (1998a) are not
included. These are Fusifiliim, Urginavia, Cliarybdis
Speta and Ebertia Speta. They may be included under
what in the diagnostic key of Speta (1998b) is referred to
as Urginea sd. If the manuscript of Speta (1998b) was
completed before the manuscript of Speta (1998a), one
would expect to find a key to these critical genera includ-
ed in the latter. This would help to clarify the distinctions
between these genera.
Drimia sensu lato as a ‘Monstergattiing ’
Botanists have in recent years advocated either a wide
(Jessop 1977; Steam 1978; Stedje 1987, 2000) or a nar-
row (Stilton 1976; Obermeyer 1980, 1981; Hilliard &
Burtt 1982) circumscription of the genus Drimia. I have
discussed this issue in detail elsewhere (Stedje 1987,
2000), and will not repeat that discussion here. Speta
(1998a) calls Drimia sensu lato a ‘Monstergattung’. He
does not define this expression, but his intention is clear-
ly uncomplimentary. Drimia sensu lato consists of up to
100 species, a number quite modest when compared with
some other Angiosperm genera. There is of course vari-
ability within the genus, but not to the extent that it forms
a ‘rag-bag’ taxon with highly heterogeneous elements.
The genus is well defined by its winged seeds, an autapo-
morphy for Drimia s.l., and the spurred bracts, a synapo-
morphy of Drimia, Bowiea and Schizobasis.
Where have all the Drimia species gone?
Under each of the genera provided with descriptions
in Speta (1998a), a list of species is given. The species
list of the genus Ledebouria Roth is said to be incom-
plete, but this is not said of any of the other genera. One
may therefore interpret those other species lists as
intended to be complete. For Africa south of the Sahara
this leaves us with 15 species of Drimia (sensu lato)
recognized by either Jessop (1977) or Stedje & Thulin
(1995), which have not been taken into account by Speta
(1998a). Does this mean that the 15 species are not
regarded as belonging to Hyacinthaceae any more, or are
they simply forgotten? If so, how can 15 species be
neglected and why are names that Jessop (1977) regarded
as synonyms of some of these species included? How
can one possibly fit these forgotten species into genera
when, as mentioned above, the circumscription of the
genera is unclear and no key is given?
One species or three genera?
In the case of the genus Avonsera, discussed later, two
apparently discordant species were combined in a single
genus. There are also, in Speta’s work (Speta 1998a),
cases where apparently closely related species are segre-
gated into different genera. Four synonyms of Drimia
modesta (Baker) Jessop (sensu Jessop 1977) have here
been placed in three different genera, Urgineopsis
Compton, Thuranthos C.H.Wright and Fusifilum. The
194
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
species are U. salted Compton, T. revoluta (Duthie) Speta,
F. dregei (Baker) Speta and F. gracilis (Duthie) Speta. As
already mentioned, different botanists must be allowed to
have different opinions as long as appropriate documenta-
tion is presented. This is, however, not done here.
COMMENTS ON THE SUBFAMILY ORNITHOGALOIDEAE
Several of the genera recognized in this subfamily
have previously been included in the genus Orni-
thogaliim L. The sub-Saharan Ornithogalum is, for
example, split into the genera Stellarioides Medicus,
Coilonox Raf., Eliokannos Raf. and Zahariadia Speta, a
new genus which is possibly monotypic. The first three
genera appear to coincide in part with Obermeyer’s
(1978) subgenera even if it seems that only a part of
Obermeyer’s subgenus Urophyllon is accommodated by
the genus Stellarioides. Where the rest of the subgenus
Urophyllon is to be placed, is unclear. The subfamily
Omithogaloideae is split into the tribes Dipcadieae and
Omithogaleae. These tribes are based on seed characters,
which are mainly quantitative, and they key out at lead
13 in Speta (1998b). The alternatives of this lead are not
very clear and it should be possible to simplify them. The
same applies to lead 12 which also refers to seed charac-
ters and is even less clear. The two alternatives of lead 1 3
are, for example: 1 ) Seeds flattened, orbiculate, D-
shaped, or elongate; tepals green, brown or yellow, or
whitish, with a green streak, versus 2) Seeds minute,
comma-shaped, glabrous or shortly pilose, rarely edged,
or large, elongate, with irregular edges, or globose to
ellipsoid; tepals white, with or without a green stripe, or
yellow or orange. Within this subfamily both tribes and
genera are defined largely on the basis of quantitative
characters of the seeds. For me it is difficult to under-
stand the necessity of this excessive splitting. Take, for
example, three species, the sub-Saharan O. temiifolium
F.Delaroche, the Moroccan O. sessiliflorum Desf. and
the Mediterranean O. narbonense L. These three species
are very similar in all characters, except possibly for
some differences in quantitative morphological charac-
ters between the two Mediterranean species, and in the
Mediterranean species having more turgid seeds than O.
temdfoliiim. I am not absolutely sure in which genera to
put these species as Speta does not treat them specifical-
ly. O. sessiliflorum in particular, does not quite fit in any-
where. As I interpret Speta’s new system, however, these
three species are put into two different tribes, Dipcadieae
and Omithogaloideae, and three different genera
Stellarioides, Cathissa Salisbury and Lonocomelos Raf.
respectively.
COMMENTS ON THE SUBFAMILY HYACINTHOIDEAE
For this subfamily the treatment is far less confusing
than for subfamily Urgineoideae, but there are some points
to be commented on. Altogether 38 genera are listed as
belonging to the subfamily Hyacinthoideae. Of these, just
21 are treated with full de.scriptions in the following text,
and there is no obvious reason for omitting the 1 7 others.
One of these 17 genera, Namopliila U. & D.Muller-
Doblies, is not mentioned at all in Speta (1998b).
The genus Avonsera Speta
The new genus Avonsera Speta is based on two
species, A. convallarioides (Perrier) Speta and A.
lachenalioides (Baker) Speta (Speta 1998a). A. conval-
larioides is a species endemic to Madagascar, originally
described in the genus Ornithogalum. Obermeyer (1978),
in endorsing the placement of the species in Ornitho-
galum, writes: ‘the characters of the flowers, capsules
and seeds agree with Ornithogalum ’. A. lachenalioides is
confined to KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape and was
placed in Drimiopsis by Jessop (1972). It appears strange
to base a genus on two species with a rather disjunct dis-
tribution that have recently been placed in two distantly
related genera by two competent South African botanists.
There may of course be good reasons for doing so, but
one would expect a short discussion of the issue. I have
not seen such in either Speta (1998a) or Speta (1998b).
CONCLUSION
Speta’s (1998a, b) treatment of Hyacinthaceae is an
unfortunate case of excessive splitting of the family
which will create more confusion than clarity. Many of
the genera, especially the new ones are monotypic. His
conclusions have no clear proven basis, neither in cladis-
tic analyses, nor in more classical criteria for generic
delimitation such as giving emphasis to qualitative mor-
phological characters and using minor characters only to
preserve genera already recognized. A full review on this
issue is given by Stuessy (1990, and references herein).
Speta’s generic delimitation might fit the Mediterranean
and European species of the family, but I see substantial
difficulties when applied to sub-Saharan species.
REFERENCES
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1982. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: IX. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 40: 247-298.
JESSOP, J.P, 1972. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 2.
Drimiopsis and Resnova. Journal of South African Botany 38:
151-162.
JESSOP, J.P, 1977, Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 7.
The taxonomy of Drimia and certain allied genera. Journal of
South African Botany 43: 265-319.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1978. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern
African species. Bothalia 12: 323-376.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1980. The status of Urginea epigea. Bothalia 13:
139.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1981. A reappraisal of Urginea altissima.
Bothalia 13: 452, 453.
PFOSSER, M. & SPETA, F, 1999. Phylogenetics of Hyacinthaceae
based on plastid DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 86: 852-875.
SPETA, F. 1998a. Systematische Analy.se der Gattung Scilla L. s.l.
(Hyacinthaceae), Phyton {Horn} 38: 1-141.
SPETA. F. 1998b. Hyacinthaceae. In K. Kubitzki, The families and
genera of vascular plants 3: 261-285. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
STEARN, W.T. 1978, Mediterranean and Indian species of Drimia
(Liliaceae): a nomenclatural survey with special reference to
the medicinal squill, D. maritima (syn. Urginea maritima).
Annales Musei Goulandris 4: 199-210.
STEDJE, B. 1987. A revision of the genus Drimia Jacq.
(Hyacinthaceae) in East Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany. 1:
655-666.
STEDJE, B. 1988. Cytotaxonomic studies within Hyacinthaceae with
special emphasis on karyotype evolution. Ph.D. thesis,
University of Oslo, Norway.
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
195
STEDJE, B. 1996. Hyacinthaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropical
East Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
STEDJE, B. 1997. Hyacinthaceae. In S. Edwards, Sebsebe Demissew
& I. Hedberg, Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea 6: 138-147. The
National Herbarium, Addis Ababa.
STEDJE, B. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation
of sub-Saharan Scilla L. (Hyacinthaceae) and allied African
genera as inferred from morphological and DNA sequence data.
Plant systematics and evolution 211: 1-11.
STEDJE, B. 2000. Evolutionary relationships of the genera Drimia.
Thuranthos, Bowiea and Schiiobasis, elucidated by morpholog-
ical and chloroplast DNA sequence data. In K.L. Wilson & D.A.
Morrison, Proceedings of the Second International Conference
on Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons, Sydney,
Australia, 1998, Vol. 1. Systematics and evolution of Monocots:
414-417. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
STEDJE, B. in press. Generic delimitation of Hyacinthaceae, with spe-
cial emphasis on sub-Saharan genera. Proceedings of the 16"'
AETEAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000. Systematics
and geography of plants 1 1 .
STEDJE. B, & THULIN, M. 1995. Synopsis of Hyacinthaceae in East
and North-East Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 15: 591-601.
STIRTON, C.H. 1976. Thuranthos: notes on generic status, morpholo-
gy, phenology and pollination biology. Bothalia 12: 161-165.
STUESSY, TF. 1990. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of
comparative data. Columbia University Press, New York.
B. STEDJE*
* University of Oslo, Botanical Garden and Museum, P.O. Box 1172
Blindem, N-0318 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: brita.stedje@nhm.uio.no
MS. received: 2000-11-02.
DENNSTAEDTIACEAE-PTEROPSIDA
HYPOLEPIS VILLOSO-VISCIDA NEW TO THE FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
Recently, a Hypolepis collection from Genadendal
in the Western Cape, differing from H. sparsisora
(Schrad.) Kuhn came to my attention. This collection
differs in the distribution of hairs on the lamina, the
presence of glandular and receptacular hairs, and larger
stomata and spores. To determine whether the plants
may be recent introductions and to determine the size of
the population, I have subsequently visited the location.
A review of herbarium collections revealed that this
species, although scarce, also occurs elsewhere in
South Africa, but has always been erroneously deter-
mined as H. sparsisora. A morphological study showed
that these plants are synonymous with H. villoso-visci-
da (Thouars) Tardieu, a species also occurring on the
South Atlantic island groups of Gough and Tristan da
Cunha.
Key to the South African species of Hypolepis
Lamina with acicular and oblong hairs confined to axes and
veins; receptacle nude; stomata 28-(37. 11)^6 pm long;
spores 24— (29.04 )-38 x 15-(19.63)-26 pm ....//. sparsisora
Lamina with acicular and glandular hairs (rarely also oblong
hairs) on axes, veins and lamina surfaces; receptacle
usually with uniseriate hairs; stomata 38-(50.33)-64
pm long; spores 32-(38.01 )^6 x 20-(23.95)-30 pm . .
H. villoso-viscida
Hypolepis villoso-viscida (Thouars) Tardieu, Elore
de Madagascar et de Comores 5,1: 6, fig. 1, t. 3-5 (1958).
Polypodium villoso-viscidum Thouars: 33: (1808). Type:
Tristan d’ Acunha, Aubert du Petit-Thouars s.n. (P, holo.).
Cheilanthes viscosa Carmich.; 511 (1818). Type; Tristan da Cunha,
Carmichael s.n. (K, holo.; BM, iso.).
Specimens e.xamined
EASTERN CAPE. — 3225 (Somerset East); Somerset East,
Boschberg, 760 m, Nov. 1875, (-DA), MacOwan 1575 (SAM).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown); Orange Kloof, W-facing
slopes, ± 220 m, 24 Nov. 2000, (-BD), Roilx 3023 (NBG). 3419
(Caledon); Genadendal, Baviaans River, north bank alongside road
upstream of weir, 280 m, 2 June 2000, (-BA), Boucher 6515 (NBG);
Genadendal, Baviaans River, above 2nd weir, ± 300 m, 7 July 2000,
(-BA), Roux 3007, 3009, 3010, 3011 (NBG).
REFERENCES
CARMICHAEL, D. 1818. Some account of the island of Tristan da
Cunha and its natural productions. Transactions of the Einnean
Society of London 12; 483-513.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M.L. 1958. Polypodiacees (sensu lato). Dennstaedti-
acees-Aspidiacees. In H. Humbert, Flore de Madagascr et des
Comores. Earn. 5,1; 1-391. Paris.
THOUARS, L.M. AUBERT DU PETIT. 1808. Esquisse de laflore de
ITsle de Tristan dAcunga. Paris.
J.P. ROUX*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received; 2000-09-01.
PORTULACACEAE
TALINUM PANICULATUM, A NATURALIZED WEED IN SOUTH AFRICA
Talinum Adans. is a medium-sized genus of semi-suc-
culent herbs and shrubs with annual branches sprouting
from a perennial base with tuberous roots. These fleshy
underground parts tend to draw the attention of succulent
plant collectors, who would include the plants in the
broadly conceived group of caudiciform succulents
(Smith et al. 1997). About 50 species are recognized in
Talinum (Von Poellnitz 1934), occurring mostly in
Africa, Australia, parts of Asia and North and South
America. In the African species the pedicels are always
swollen below the fruit and are more or less recurved
when fruiting (Tolken 1969). Eive species are indigenous
in South Africa, restricted to summer rainfall areas
(Tolken 1969). Talinum paniculatum (Jacq.) Gaertn. is
196
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 4. — Talinum paniculatum: A, habit of plant in fruit, x 0.6; B,
open flower as seen from above, x 5; C, flower in side view
with one petal removed, x 5; D, capsular fruit x 3.7; E, dissect-
ed capsule showing multiple seeds with free-central placenta-
tion, X 3.7. Artist: Marietjie Steyn.
one of two alien species of Portulacaceae that has
become naturalized in the flora of southern Africa
(Jordaan 1997). This report forms part of ongoing efforts
to document, describe and illustrate naturalized succu-
lents in southern Africa.
Known as ‘American star-flowers’ or ‘pink star-flow-
ers’, T. paniculatum is native to the plains from Texas to
Arizona, south and central Florida, Mexico, the West
Indies and South America (Gray 1895; Von Poellnitz
1934). Its occurrence in Sri Lanka and in Malaysia
(Singapore), Indonesia (Java), Thailand and China, prob-
ably resulted from early cultivation and a subsequent
escape into the wild (Von Poellnitz 1934). In South
Africa, the species was recorded about thirty years ago as
a garden escape in a few places, but did not then seem to
spread as a weed (Tolken 1969). It has since become
established as a troublesome weed in domestic and pub-
lic gardens in and around Pretoria and along the Western
Cape coast with its Mediterranean-type climate. The
plants are not easy to eradicate; although the aerial parts
tend to die off in winter, the species is perennial through
a thickened rhizome and fleshy roots (Figure 4). It also
flowers and fruits prolifically and produces a multitude
of wind-dispersed microscopic seeds that spread and
germinate easily.
2406000-600 Talinum paniculatum (Jacq.) Gaertth,
De fructibus et seminibus plantarum 2: 219, t. 128 (1791);
Poelln.: 1 (1934); Adams: 267 (1972). Type: not desig-
nated.
Portulaca paniculata Jacq.: 22 (1760) non L.: 640 (1762); Jacq.:
148 (1763); Jacq.: 71, t. 151 (1772-1773).
Portulaca patens L.: 242 (1771); Ruclingia patens (L.) Ehrh.: 135
(1788); Helianthemoides patens (L.) Med.: 95 (1789); Talinum patens
(L.) Willd.: 863 (1799); A. Gray: 265 (1895); Claytonia patens (L.)
Kuntze: 56 (1891). Type: not known.
T. reflexum Cav.: 1, t. 1 (1791); Sims: t.1543 (1813); Portulaca
reflexa (Cav.) Haw.: 141 (1803); Claytonia reflexa (Cav.) Kuntze: 57
(1891). Type: not known.
T. sarmentosum Engelm.: 153 (1850); Claytonia sarmentosa
(Engelm.) Kuntze: 57 (1891); T. reflexum var. sarmentosum (Engelm.)
Small: 415 (1903); T. paniculata var. sarmentosum (Engelm.) Poelln.:
123 (1933). Type: not known.
For a more complete list of synonyms, see Von
Poellnitz (1934: 11).
Glabrous herb with annual branches developing from
perennial base with tuberous roots. Stems erect, terete, up
to 0.4 m long. Leaves alternate to subopposite, petiolate,
glabrous, somewhat succulent; blade obovate or oblance-
olate, varying to spatulate, 40-110 x 15-45 mm, apex
acute to rounded, margins entire; petiole swollen at base;
exstipulate. Inflorescence terminal, panicle-like, com-
pound, dichasial, up to 450 mm long; bracteoles minute,
± 1 mm long, membranous, lanceolate, early deciduous.
Flowers bisexual, star-shaped, ± 2.5 mm diam., opening
mid-afternoon, closing at dusk; pedicels filiform, ±3.5
mm long. Sepals 2, opposite, green, glabrous, 1 mm
long, acuminate, recurved in open flower. Petals 5,
oblong with rounded apices, spreading, pink to rose-
coloured, tardily deciduous from capsule. Stamens
numerous, ± 1.5 mm long; filaments dorsifixed; anthers
opening with slits. Ovary superior, spherical, 1 mm
diam., unilocular, multi-ovular, placentation free-central;
style terete, articulating at base; stigma with 3 spatulate
lobes. Capsule spherical, 2.5 mm diam., thin-walled,
bright orange when young, turning to brown during
ripening, opening with 3 longitudinal slits. Seeds numer-
ous, lens-shaped, 0.8-0. 9 mm long, short-beaked with
small, white aril at hilum, seed coat shiny black, tuber-
culate. Figure 4. Chromosome number unknown.
Flowering time'. September to April.
Vouchers: Barker 4439 (PRE); Barrett 333 (PRE); Pegler 1587
(PRE); G.K Smith & E.M.A. Steyn 4 (PRE).
Illustrations: Jacq.: t. 151 (1772-1773) as P. paniculata; Cav.: t.I
(1791), as T. reflexum; Sims: t. 1543 (1813), as 71 reflexum.
Common names: American star-flower (Von Poellnitz
1934: 1) or pink star-flower (Gray 1895).
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
197
REFERENCES
ADAMS. C.D. 1972. Flowering plants of Jamaica: 267. University
Press. Glasgow.
CAVANILLES. A.J. 1791. Taliniim reflexion. leones el descriptiones
plantariim 1: 1, t. 1. (Reprint 1965). Cramer, New York.
EHRHART. J.F. 1788. Beitrdge zur Naturkunde 2: 135.
ENGELMANN. G. 1850. Portulacaceae. Boston Journal of Natural
History 6: 153.
GAERTNER, J. 1791. Talinwn Adans. De fructibus et seminus plan-
tarum 2: 219. t. 128. fig. 13. Guilielmi Henrici Schrammii,
Tubinge.
GRAY, A. 1895. Talinwn patens Willd. Synoptical flora of North
America 1. Part 1, Fascicle 1: 265. American Book Co., New
York.
HAWORTH. A. H. 1803. Portulacca (sic.). Miscellanea naturalia: 141.
Taylor, London.
JACQUIN. N.J. 1760. Enumeratio systematica plantarum: 22.
Lugduni, Batavorum.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1763. Selectarum stirpium americanarum historia:
148. (1971 Facsimile). Hafner, New York.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1772-1773. Hortus botanicus vindobonensis 2: 71, t.
151. Kaliwoda, Vindobonae.
JORDAAN. M. 1997. Portulacaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld,
T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of
southern African succulent plants: 145. Umdaus Press. Pretoria.
KUNTZE. O. 1891. Portulacaceae. Revisio generum plantarum 1: 56,
57. Kommisionen. Leipzig.
LINNAEUS, C. 1762. Species plantarum, Vol. 1, edn 2: 640.
Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum: 242. (1961 Facsimile).
Cramer. Weinheim.
MEDIKUS, F.K. 1789. Philosophische Botanik 1: 95. Neue Hof- und
Akademische Buchhandlungen, Mannheim.
SIMS, J.K. 1813. Talinum reflexion. Reflex-flowered Talinum. Curtis’s
Botanical Magazine 37: t. 1543.
SMALL, J.K. 1903. Talinum Adans. Flora of the southeastern United
States: 415. Small. New York.
SMITH, G.F., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., ARNOLD, T.H., STEFFENS,
F.E., DIXON, R.D. & RETIEF, JA. (eds). 1997. List of south-
ern African succulent plants: ii. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
TOLKEN. H.R. 1969. The genus Talinum (Portulacaceae) in southern
Africa. Bothalia 10: 19-28.
VON POELLNITZ, K. 1933. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Talinum
Adans. (Portulacaceae). Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen
Gesellschaft 51: 123.
VON POELLNITZ, K. 1934. Monographic der Gattung Talinum
Adans. Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis 35:
1-34.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1799. Talinum patens. Species plantarum 2, Part
2: 863. Nauk, Berlin.
E.M.A. STEYN* and G.FSMITH*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-04-06.
ZAMIACEAE
ENCEPHALARTOS RELICTUS: A NEW SPECIES FROM SOUTHERN AFRICA
In a continuing attempt to document biodiversity in the
African Zamiaceae, an evaluation of material from
Swaziland (Hurter 1993) has led to the conclusion that
there exists a distinct undescribed species, that may already
be extinct in the wild. Due to the fact that no new material
has been forthcoming in more than 20 years it was decided
that this relict species should be described for posterity.
Encephalartos relictus P.J.H. Hurter, sp. nov., E.
heenanii R. A. Dyer foliis rigidis caesiis similis, sed pinnis
linearo-lanceolatis adscendentis inflexis, microsporo-
phyllis ovatis tomentosis, et habitatione nemorali differt.
Strobili glabrous, scale facets smooth, light greenish
yellow. Megastrobili unknown. Microstrobili 1-3 per
trunk, subconical, 200-240 x 120-150 mm, stalked on
peduncle 30-50 mm long. Median microsporophylls
spreading, more or less at right angles to axis, lamina
oblong, tapering to base, ± 35^0 mm long, 30-35 mm
wide and 10-15 mm high, margins contracted to pedi-
cel, bulla with terminal facet projecting slightly as
drooping lip-like structure, edges verrucose, microspo-
rangia separated from lateral margins. Figure 5.
Diagnostic features and affinities
TYPE. — Swaziland: Siteki, Farm Muti-Muti, (leaf
and part of male cone), 15-03-1971, J.J.P. du Preez s.n.
(PRE33123, holo.).
Plant arborescent, suckering from base. Trunk up to
2.5 m long, 400^50 mm diam., leaf bases persistent,
crown and cataphylls tomentose, golden brown, becom-
ing subglabrous with age. Leaves numerous in dense,
spreading crown, rigid, subsessile, waxy blue-grey in
colour, 1.0-1.2(-1.4) m long, pinnae ascending. Petiole
apparent, woolly, becoming subglabrous with age,
except pulvinus. Rachis straight, woolly, becoming
subglabrous with age, apex slightly incurved. Pinnae
woolly, becoming glabrous with age, entire, veins
raised abaxially, margins slightly thickened, inflexed,
directed towards apex of leaf at an angle of ± 60° to
rachis, opposing leaflets inflexed, set at an angle of ±
40° to each other and orientated succubously, proximal
pinnae gradually reduced to a few prickles. Median
leaflets oblong-lanceolate, pungent, 200-250 x 14-17
mm, margins entire, 20-25 prominent veins abaxially.
E. relictus superficially resembles E. heenanii
R. A. Dyer (Dyer 1972), on account of its stiff waxy blue-
grey leaves and pinnae with the veins prominently
raised abaxially. However, it differs markedly from E.
heenanii in morphology, habit and habitat. E. relictus
used to occur in mixed deciduous woodland (Figure 6),
whereas E. heenanii occurs in high rainfall, high alti-
tude, sour grassland. The important morphological dif-
ferences between the two species are summarized in the
following table.
TABLE 1 . — Differences between E. heenanii and E. relictus
198
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 5. — Encephalartos relictus
RJ.H. Hurter. A-C, micro-
sporophyll: A, abaxial view;
B, frontal view; C, side view.
D, median pinna, adaxial
view; E, F, median section of
leaf showing inflexed nature
of pinnae; G, median pinna,
abaxial view and orientation
towards apex of leaf; H, peti-
ole and proximal pinnae.
Scale bars: A-H, 30 mm.
Artist: S.J. Burrows.
FIGURE 6. — Encephalartos relictus
in habitat (photo: J.J.P. du
Preez).
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
199
FIGURE 7. — Encephalartos relictus microstrobili (photo: J.J.R du
Preez).
Geographical distribution
As far as is known, this species used to grow only at
a single locality in Swaziland, at an altitude of 1 000 m
(Figure 8). Its present conservation status code (lUCN
1994) is ExW.
Other specimen examined
SWAZILAND. — Siteki, Farm Muti-Muti, P.J.H. Hurter 95s/hl
(GLOW).
FIGURE 8. — Known former distribution of Encephalartos relictus.
The species no longer occurs in the wild (Red List category
ExW).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research of which this publication is a result was
financed by the National Botanical Institute. The artist is
Sandie Burrows. The director of the National Botanical
Institute (PRE) is thanked for permission to use the
accompanying photographs.
REFERENCES
DYER, R.A. 1972. A new species of Encephalartos from Swaziland.
Bothalia 10: 539-546.
HURTER, P.J.H. 1993. Focus on: Encephalartos heenanii.
Encephalartos No. 40: 4—7.
lUCN 1994. lUCN Red List Categories. lUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
P.J.H. HURTER* and H.F. GLEN**
* Lowveld National Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 1024, 1200
Nelspruit, South Africa.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2000-03-08.
NEW RECORDS AND DISTRIBUTIONAL DISJUNCTIONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA,
ZIMBABWE AND MOZAMBIQUE
INTRODUCTION
Floristic evidence for the continuity of vegetation
types often lingers in the form of relicts which inhabit
isolated refugia. This evidence can be ambiguous in fam-
ilies with adaptations to long distance dispersal.
However, in a number of families, vicariance is the only
logical explanation for distributional anomalies. This
paper records disjunctions in Acanthaceae, Thymelaea-
ceae and Lamiaceae, all families renowned for the
parochial dispersal of seeds and fruits.
ACANTHACEAE
Recent research (Edwards & Harrison 1998) revealed
a distributional extension to the range of Pseuderan-
themum hildebrandtii Lindau (Acanthaceae) which reit-
erates the floristic links between tropical East Africa and
northern KwaZulu-Natal. This species is associated with
woodlands and provides compelling evidence of the con-
tinuity of dense savanna and forest habitat between the
eastern seaboard of South Africa and populations in
Tanzania. Acanthaceae have explosive fruits with elastic
200
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 9. — Recorded distribution of Metaningia pubinervia.
funicles (retinaculae) which are effective in local disper-
sal but are not suitable for long distance dispersal. It was
therefore exciting to find another species of forest
Acanthaceae, Metarungia pubinen’ia, which corrobo-
rates the above pattern.
According to Baden (198 1 ) the genus Metarungia com-
prises three species, two of which, M. galpinii (Baden)
Baden and M. longistrohus (C.B. Clarke) Baden, are en-
demic to the subcontinent and the type species, M.
pubinervia (T.Anderson) Baden, is common in tropical
East Africa, but has been recorded in southern Mozam-
bique. The phytogeography of Metarungia is intriguing
in its inconsistency. M. longistrobus occurs in asso-
ciation with forest patches in Mpumalanga, southwest
Mozambique and Swaziland and, although the species
occasionally ventures into stony grasslands with steep
slopes, it is unable to survive fire. Similarly, M. galpinii
is limited to forest habitats around East London, Eastern
Cape, but in cultivation both species are more vigorous
in exposed situations. There is no doubt that M. galpinii
and M. longistrobus are sister species, the plants have
very similar habit, creamy mustard corollas of similar
size, similar androecia, gynoecia, inflorescence struc-
ture, fruits and seeds. The major differences which sep-
arate them relate to indumental differences, bract size,
the loss of bracteoles in M. galpinii, and the much small-
er calyces of M. longistrobus. If one accepts that these
are vicarious sister species, then their current parochial
distributions (Baden 1981) are remnants of the range of
their hypothetical parent. This distributional disjunction
provides compelling evidence of an ancient forest link
between the afromontane and riverine forests of
Mpumalanga, in the north, and the coastal forests
around East London. Neither species has yet been
recorded from the intervening forests of KwaZulu-
Natal. Extending this line of reasoning to M. pubinervia
(Figure 9), allows one to postulate past forest linkage
between the southern (Krantzkloof) and northern
(Tanzanian) populations.
Metarungia pubinervia (T.Anderson) Baden in
Kew Bulletin 39: 638 (1984). Macrorungia pubinervia
(T.Anderson) C.B.Clarke: 255 (1900); Brenan & Green-
way: 13 (1949); Dale & Greenway: 17 (1961); Agnew: 607
(1974); Baden: 148 (1981). Rungia pubinervia T.Ainderson:
46 (1863). Himantochilus pubinerx’ia (T.Anderson) Lindau:
373 (1895a). Anisotes pubinervis (T.Anderson) Heine: 189
(1966). Type: Malawi, Mt Chiradzulu, Kirk s.n. (K!, lecto.).
Himantochilus marginatus Lindau: 60 (1894); Lindau: 346 ( 1895b).
Type: Tanzania, Usambara. Holst 9063 (HBG, lecto.; G, P, M, Z, W).
Shrubs 1-5 m tall; stems initially hairy, often with
aerial roots. Leaves elliptic to narrowly obovate,
140-250 X 40-100 mm, sparsely strigose to glabrescent,
apex acute to acuminate, veins sericeous when young,
becoming glabrescent, acarodomatia present in vein
axes; petiole 15-60 mm long. Inflorescences axillary,
usually on leafless stems, 15-50 mm long; peduncles sel-
dom exceeding 2 mm long, glabrescent; bracts tightly
imbricate; lower bracts sterile, ovate to elliptic, 5-12 x
3-5 mm, apex slightly acuminate, margin slightly scari-
ous; fertile bracts broadly ovate, 10-15 x 6-9 mm, apex
acuminate, margin markedly scarious, pink to red;
bracteoles absent. Calyx 9-12 mm long, membranous;
lobes pink, 7-9 x 2-3 mm, midveins green, extending
into an apiculus. Corolla cylindrical, red; tube 9-1 1 mm;
upper lip 28-31 x 8 mm, cucullate; lower lip coiled at
anthesis, 20 x 3 mm. Stamens 2; filaments 20 mm long,
cream-coloured, epipetalous, attached in throat; anther
thecae oblique, 2-3 mm long. Ovary 2. 5-3.0 x 1.5 mm,
glabrescent; style 27-30 mm long, glabrous; nectarifer-
ous cupule 1-2 mm tall.
In the Krantzkloof population bracteoles were not
observed. However, Baden (1981) records the occasion-
al occurrence of linear bracteoles in tropical populations
of M. pubinervia. In a generic context, the fugitive
occurrence of bracteoles in this species is interesting
because this character is used to discriminate between M.
longistrobus and M. galpinii.
Throughout its range M. pubinerx’ia occurs between
500 and 2 000 m in riverine and evergreen forest, in light
shade. The Krantzkloof population is limited to scree
along the base of sandstone cliffs. This unstable substrate
reduces the establishment of the tree canopy and maintains
the higher light intensities in which the species thrives.
This population is fairly large (several hundred adult indi-
viduals and an abundance of seedlings) and the plants,
although conspicuous, are in a fairly remote section of the
gorge and have consequently escaped detection.
Specimen examined
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Krantzkloof
Nature Reserve, (-DD), Styles, Johnson & Edwards s.n. (K, NH, NU,
PRE).
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
201
THYMELAEACEAE
The poor capacity for long distance dispersal is com-
mon to a number of families, including Thymelaeaceae.
Most South African species of Gnidia are grassland
inhabitants and, due to the continuity of this habitat, rela-
tively few species display disjunct distributions. Gnidia
denudata is anomalous in this regard. The species has a
tree-like habit and occurs in forest margins, lacking the
resprouting caudex which enables grassland taxa to sur-
vive fire. The remaining Gnidia species are shorter,
multi-stemmed shrubs or herbs inhabiting fynbos, grass-
land or subalpine zones. Lindley (1823) described G.
denudata, the specific epithet referring to the lack of
lamina hairs, which usually distinguishes this species
from G. imbricata L.
Gnidia denudata LindL, Botanical Register 9: t. 757
(1823); Spreng.: 152 (1827); Meisn.: 441 (1840); Drege:
123 (1843); Meisn.: 585 (1857); C.H.Wright: 63 (1915). G.
tomentosa sensu Hook.: t. 2761 (1827) non Thunb. Type:
South Africa, in nemorosis prope George, IV. C. b.,
Drege (NY, iso!).
Shrub to small tree up to 3 m tall (Wright 1915).
Branches slender, erect to laxly arching, and pilose when
young, glabrescent with age. Leaves simple, exstipulate,
3-5-veined from base, clustered towards ends of branches,
pilose when young. Inflorescences terminal or lateral clus-
ters comprising 4—6 mbular, pale flowers; involucral bracts
green, foliaceous, smaller than leaves, as long as hypanthia.
Flowers 4-merous, sweetly scented at night; petaloid scales
paired, narrowly oblong, alternating with calyx lobes.
Stamens 8, in 2 rows in mouth and throat of tube.
The pilose young stems, leaves and flowers, together
with the comparatively rare condition of broadly foli-
aceous leaves that are three to five-veined from the base,
distinguish this species.
Some confusion has arisen regarding the nomenclature
of G. denudata and G. tomentosa. Linnaeus (1753)
described G. tomentosa from the mountains of the Cape
Peninsula and Worcester areas. This shrub attains about 1
m in height and bears slightly scabrid, semi-coriaceous
leaves which have verrucose surfaces: a result of raised
epidermal cells around the bases of hairs. Flowers, ± 6, are
produced only in terminal inflorescences. Hooker (1827)
misapplied G. tomentosa to plants of G. denudata. Leaves
of G. denudata lack the coarse texture and verrucose sur-
faces typical to G. tomentosa. In addition, the narrowly
oblong petaloid scales of G. denudata distinguish it from
G. tomentosa which has broad fleshy scales.
The distribution of this species shows a clear disjunc-
tion (Figure 10). It occurs south of Oudtshoom and in the
Knysna District of Western Cape and in the Willowmore
District of Eastern Cape, where it inhabits margins of
afromontane forest (Lubke & McKenzie 1996).
Additional, less precise, distribution records (omitted
from Figure 10) come from Western and Eastern Cape,
the Swellendam Mountains; near Touws River, and the
forest at Elands River, Tsitsikamma, Humansdorp
(Wright 1915). The population from Inhaca Island,
FIGURE 10. — Recorded distribution of Gnidia denudata, •, (O dis-
puted record); Plectranthus dolomiticus, ▲.
Mozambique, is highly disjunct. A specimen housed in
the Geneva Herbarium and apparently collected by
Drege from Port Natal (Durban) is probably erroneously
labelled, as this species does not appear in any of his list-
ing of collections from the province (Drege 1843). The
specimen Coetzee s.n., collected in KwaZulu-Natal (and
without any further locality details) in 1943, appears to
be the only other collection from this province, which is
curious in the light of the common occurrence of Cape
relicts on the Natal Group Sandstone of the eastern
seaboard (Van Wyk 1990). The species also appears to
be absent from the mainland of Mozambique. Wright
(1915) regarded the specimen, Rogers 20682 (STE), col-
lected near Grahamstown, as a doubtful record, but in the
light of the Inhaca population, this may warrant further
investigation.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Saasveld Forestry
College, (-DC), Beaumont & Smith s.n. (NU); Karatura River, (-DD),
Schlecliter 5887 (C). 3323 (Willowmore): Diepwalle Forest Reserve,
(-CC), Bos 735 (STE). 3423 (Knysna): between Kruisfontein and
Bracken Hill, (-AA), Dahlgren & Peterson 1484 (GB),
EASTERN CAPE.— 3323 (Willowmore): Camel Pile, (-DD),
Esterhuysen 27327 (GB). 3326 (Grahamstown): Grahamstown, (-BC),
Rogers 28682 (GRA).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — Precise locality unknown: Coetzee s.n. (J),
Drege s.n. (G).
MOZAMBIQUE. — 2632 (Bela Vista): Inhaca Island, (-BB),
Maguire 35 (J),
LAMIACEAE
Plectranthus dolomiticus was described in 1984 by
Codd. At that time, and in the subsequent FSA account
(Codd 1985), the species was known only from the type
locality near Penge Mine in Mpumalanga. Recently, a
second population of the species was recorded from
granite domes in Zimbabwe (Figure 10). While the geol-
ogy of the respective sites is different, the physical
aspects are very similar. Both populations occur in arid
woodland on rock outcrops where plants occur in
humus-filled crevices. During the dry season the species
withers aerially and the populations rely on subter-
202
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
ranean tubers for sustenance. The disjunction, approach-
ing 700 km, is considerable for Plectranthus species
which have no mechanism to aid long-distance disper-
sal. It is therefore likely that additional populations of
the species occur(ed) in the intervening rocky savanna.
Codd’s (1985) interpretation of alliances, between P.
dolomiticus and the remainder of the genus, was that its
closest relative is P. petiolaris. Considerable similarity
exists between the flowers of these two species, both of
which are sigmoid, with similar proportions and deep
purple colouring. Recently a third species, which dis-
plays a very similar corolla, was discovered in
Zimbabwe (Edwards, Paton & Crouch 2000). This last
species, P. porphyranthus T.J. Edwards & N.Crouch, is
without doubt convergent in corolla form for it belongs
to section Coleoides, whereas the former species are
members of section Plectranthus. The convergence is
probably being driven by widespread anthophorid bees,
of the genus Amegilla, which are the primary pollina-
tors. Amegilla caelestina (Cockrell), A. fallax (Smith)
and A. bothai (Meadt-Woldo) were recorded on P por-
phyranthus, and A. caelestina, A. bothai and A. mimad-
vena (Cockrell) are the primary pollinators of P. petio-
laris. The proposed alliance of P. dolomiticus with P.
petiolaris (Codd 1985), based on corolla characters,
may need reviewing in light of the convergent corolla
design of P. porphyranthus.
Specimens examined
Plectranthus dolomiticus
ZIMBABWE.— 1832 (Juliasdale), Pine Lake Inn, (-BA), Vos 339
(NU).
Plectranthus porphyranthus
ZIMBABWE. — 2029 (Harare), Masvingo, (-BB) Richmond Farm,
Crouch 800 (E, K, NH, NU, PRE); Harare, 3 miles [4.8 km] east of
Zimbabwe (ruins), Leach 8043 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Natal University Research Fund and the National
Research Fund are thanked for their financial assistance.
The following herbaria C, G, GB, GRA, J, K, NU, PRE
and STE are thanked for the loan of herbarium material
and the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is thanked
for access to the Mary Gunn Library. Neil Crouch is
acknowledged for his endless enthusiasm in tracking
down obscure references. Christina Potgieter is thanked
for contributing insect data on the pollination of
Plectranthus petiolaris. Rod Edwards is acknowledged
for his contribution in the discovery of the Metarungia
pubinervia population.
REFERENCES
AGNEW, A.D.Q. 1974. Acanthaceae. Upland Kenya wild flowers'.
573-61 1. Oxford University Press.
ANDERSON, T. 1863. African Acanthaceae. Proceedings of the Linnaean
Society, Botany 7: 13-54.
BADEN, C. 1981. The genus Macrorungia (Acanthaceae), a taxonomic
revision. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 638.
BADEN, C. 1984. Metarungia. a valid name for Macrorungia auctt.
(Acanthaceae). Kew Bulletin 39: 638.
BRENAN, J.P.M. & GREENWAY, P.J. 1949. Checklist of the forest trees
and shrubs of the British Empire, Tanganyika Territory 5,2:
1-319. Imperial Forestry Institute, Oxford.
CLARKE, C.B. 1900. Acanthaceae. Flora of tropical Africa 5: 1-255.
Reeve, London.
CODD, L.E. 1984. A new species of Plectranthus (Lamiaceae). Bothalia
15: 142, 143.
CODD, L.E. 1985. Plectranthus (Lamiaceae). Flora of southern Africa
28,4: 137-172.
DALE, I.R. & GREENWAY, P.J. 1961 . Kenya trees and shrubs. Hatchards,
London.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente. Flora 2:
44-229. Leipzig/Regensburg.
EDWARDS, T.J. & HARRISON, E.R. 1998. New records from KwaZulu-
Natal, South Africa. Bothalia 28: 187-190.
EDWARDS, T.J., PATON, A. & CROUCH, N. 2000. A new species of
Plectranthus (Lamiaceae) from Zimbabwe. Kew Bulletin 55:
459-464.
HEINE, H. 1966. Acanthaceae. Flora du Gabon 13: 3-241. Paris.
HOOKER, J.D. 1827. Gnidia tomentosa. Botanical Magazine 54: t. 2761 .
London.
LINDAU, G. 1894. Acanthaceae africanae II. Botanische Jahrbucher
20: 1-78.
LINDAU, G. 1 895a. Acanthaceae. Die Pflanzenwelt Ost-Afrikas und der
Nachbargebiete Deutsch Ost-Afrika 5,C: 365-374.
LINDAU, G. 1895b. Acanthaceae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien
4,3b: 274-354. Leipzig.
LINDLEY, J. 1823. G?tidia denudata. Botanical Register 9: t. 757. London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Gnidia tomentosa. Species plantarum, edn 1.
Salvius, Stockholm.
LUBKE, R. & MCKENZIE, B. 1996. In A.B. LOW & A.G. REBELO,
Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department
of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
MEISNER, C.F. 1840. Synopsis Thymelaearum, Polygonearum et
Begoniarum Africae Australis, imprimus a cl. J.J. Drege lec-
tarum. Linnaea 14: 385-516.
MEISNER, C.F. 1857. Thymelaeaceae. In A. P.D. de Candolle, Prodro-
mus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 14: 493-605. Treuttel
& Wiirtz, Paris, Strasburg, London.
SPRENGEL, K. 1827. In C. Linnaei, Systema vegetabUium, Curare
posteriores 152. Gottingen.
VAN WYK, A.E. 1990. The sandstone regions of Natal and Pondoland:
remarkable centres of endemism. Palaeoecology of Africa and
the surrounding islands 21 : 243-257. Balkema, Rotterdam.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,2: 63, 64. Reeve, Ashford, Kent.
T.J. EDWARDS*!, A.J. BEAUMONT* and D. STYLES*
* School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal, Private Bag XOl ,
3209, Scottsville.
t Author for correspondence.
MS. received: 2000-10-26.
Bothalia31.2 (2001)
203
COLCHICACEAE
A REMARKABLE NEW SPECIES OF ANDROCYMBIUM FROM NORTHERN CAPE. SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
A member of the Old World lilialean family Colchi-
caceae (Nordenstam 1998), Androcymbium Willd. is a
largely African genus comprising some 40 species, main-
ly of arid and semi-arid areas. It has its greatest diversi-
ty in southern Africa where the majority of species, at
least three quarters of the total, occur (Muller-Doblies
1984; Meyer 2000). Just three of these extend into tropi-
cal Africa, one as far north as Ethiopia (Baker 1897;
Sebsebe Demissew 1997). Two more species are endem-
ic to the Canary Islands and a further six are distributed
along the arid fringe of the south Mediterranean littoral
(Pedrola-Monfort & Caujape-Castells 1998). The genus
is distinguished from the other truly cormous members
of the family by its condensed or rarely elongated stem,
and stellate-campanulate flowers with free tepals borne
in the axils of large, leaf-like bracts.
The genus Androcymbium was divided by Krause
(1921) into three sections based on the shape of the
tepals. The largest of these sections, sect. Androcymbium
(= Cymbanthes) is characterized by auriculate, deeply
cucullate tepal limbs and is almost entirely southern
African with a few species extending into tropical Africa,
Ethiopia and Eritrea. The remaining sub-Saharan
species, along with the more northern members of the
genus, have flat or shallowly concave tepal limbs with-
out distinct basal auricles. Relationships between these
species are difficult to infer. Krause (1921) recognized
the somewhat heterogeneous nature of the group in erect-
ing the monotypic sect. Dregeocymbium to accommo-
date the rather aberrant southern African A. dregei Presl.
This species is distinguished from the other taxa with
plane tepals by its well-developed aerial stem and
extremely short stylules. The other species with flat
tepals known to him, which included the Mediterranean
taxa plus two of the sub-Saharan species, A. bellum
Schltr. & Krause and A. roseurn Engl., were accommo-
dated in sect. Eryllirostictus.
The distinction between sections Dregeocymbium and
Erythrostictus was blurred by the subsequent discovery
of two species from southern Namibia and northern
Namaqualand, A. exiguum Roessler and A. cruciatum U.
& D.Miill-Doblies, which are apparently intermediate
between them (Roessler 1974; MUller-Doblies & Muller-
Doblies 1984). The two sections were consequently
combined by Miiller-Doblies & Muller-Doblies (1984).
Section Erythrostictus thus currently comprises four
species from southern Africa and about six species from
the Canary Islands and the Mediterranean. Among the
southern African species of sect. Erythrostictus, three are
restricted to the winter rainfall region of Western and
Northern Cape and southern Namibia, and only one, A.
roseurn, was previously known to occur in the summer
rainfall zone of southern Africa. This unusual species
occurs in northern Namibia, Angola and Botswana. It is
readily distinguished from all other southern African
species by its rosulate, multifoliate habit and prominent-
ly exposed pinkish flowers that are not concealed by the
leaf-like bracts. It was a great surprise, therefore, to
encounter a similar species in the Great Karoo near De
Aar. Closer examination revealed that although allied to
A. roseurn, it is quite distinct from that species.
Androcymbium asteroides 7. & Gold-
blatt, sp. nov., haec species habitu caulescente, foliis
rosulatis multis atque tepalomm limbis oblongis exauricu-
latis Androcymbio roseo Engl, similis, sed ab eo foliis
lanceolatis (3-) 10- 18 mm lads atque floribus omnino
albis supra apicem plantae vix vel baud protuberantibus
tepalorum breviorum latiorumque ungue ±7x3 mm ac
limbo ovato 8-9 x 4-6 mm differt.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2922 (Prieska): Prieska com-
monage, in vlei ground, 06-05-1928, (-DA), Bryant sub
Marloth 13570 (PRE, holo.).
Stemless perennial with indistinguishable intemodes
and leaves in basal rosette. Cotw ovoid, 10-15 mm
diam.; tunics dark brown, coriaceous. Cataphyll single,
70-110 mm long, translucent, papery in texture. Leaves
± 8, spreading, lanceolate, (60-)9()-l 10 x (3-) 10-1 8 mm,
but expanding up to 25 mm wide at base, attenuate,
amplexicaul, upper leaves widening more conspicuously
towards base than lower, spirally inserted, glaucous
green, lightly canaliculate with depressed median vein,
margins ciliolate, grading into floral leaves; fertile floral
leaves shorter and broader at base than foliage leaves,
partially encircling flowers but not obscuring them,
suberect or incurved. Elowers 2-6, sessile, not or slight-
ly protruding above crown of plant; perianth ± 10 mm
diam., white, unscented; tepals unequal, inner slightly
smaller than outer, (1 3-) 15- 17 mm long, limb flat or
lightly concave, ovate, 8-9 x 4—6 mm, claw oblong-
cuneate, 6-8 x 2-3 mm. Stamens included; filaments
arcuate, 4-5 mm long, greenish yellow; anthers 2 mm
long, yellow; nectary wider than filament base, ovate
with central keel, 1.2 mm diam., greenish yellow. Ovary
obovoid, 3-lobed, 5-6 mm long, white flushed green
above, stylules 6 mm long, white, stigmas elongate, 1
mm long. Capsule subglobose, coriaceous, 17 mm long.
Seeds subglobose, 2.0-2. 5 mm diam., dark brown, testa
rugulose. Elowering time: May to June. Figure 11.
Distribution and biology: the species is largely restrict-
ed to the southern edge of the interior plateau of southern
Africa at altitudes of ± 1 400 m (Figure 12), and is not
uncommon southeast of De Aar around Hanover and
Richmond in Northern Cape. It occurs in seasonally
waterlogged depressions in clay soils, usually derived
from dolerite. These depressions, due to the particular
properties of the doleritic clays, are locally moist for much
longer than the surrounding flats and constitute a special-
ized, highly localized habitat that is occupied by several
dwarf geophytes apart from Androcymbium asteroides.
Among these are Massonia comata, Polyxena ensifolia
(Hyacinthaceae) and Moraea falcifolia (Iridaceae). These
204
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 1 1 . — Androcymbium aster-
oides. A, whole plant with
corm; B, individual flower
and subtending leaf; C, outer
tepal and stamen; D, gynoe-
cium. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Artist: John Manning.
plants share a suite of morphological characters, including
the stemless habit with spreading or prostrate leaves, sub-
terranean ovaries and pale-coloured flowers apparently
adapted to a generalist pollination strategy. Their growth
cycle is closely linked to the local climate and they sprout
rapidly in response to the late summer and autumn rains
that characterize the climate of the area. They flower soon
after sprouting, in late autumn or early winter, before tem-
peratures drop too low for active growth.
History, this singular species seems to have been first
collected by E.G. Bryant in 1925. Bryant, a mining engi-
neer with a great interest in fodder plants and conserva-
tion, moved to Prieska in 1920, where he collected exten-
sively. This first collection was sent to the Bolus
Herbarium, where it remained among the incertae.
FIGURE 12. — Distribution of Androcymbium asteroides in Northern
Cape.
Bryant was clearly intrigued by the species as he made
several collections of it over the years. The second of
these, which serves as the type, he sent to Rudolf
Marloth, who identified it as A. roseum. This determina-
tion was then applied to the few subsequent collections
that have been made.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Androcymbium aster-
oides is clearly allied to A. roseum, with which it shares a
multifoliate, rosette habit and more or less flat or shallow-
ly concave tepal limbs lacking prominent basal auricles. It
is distinguished from A. roseum by the broader, lanceolate
leaves with the blades usually at least 10 mm wide towards
the base and smaller, pure white flowers that do not pro-
trude much above the crown of the plant. The tepal claws
are oblong, 6-8 mm long and the limbs ovate, 8-9 x 4-6
mm. A roseum is characterized by linear-lanceolate leaves
up to 5 mm wide and pinkish or pink-streaked flowers that
protrude conspicuously above the crown of the plant. The
tepal claws are narrowly oblong, 10-12 mm long and the
narrowly oblong-elliptic limbs are 13-16 x 3^ mm. A
fine illustration of A. roseum accompanies the account of
the species by Dyer (1956).
These two species show a marked similaiity to the
Mediterranean species of Androcymbium in their multifoli-
ate, rosette habit, monomorphic leaves and flat tepals. It is
likely, however, that most if not all of these are plesiomor-
phic states and the exact relationship between the
Mediterranean and Macronesian species and the other
African members of sect. Erythrostictus has yet to be
demonstrated. A resolution of the broad patterns of rela-
tionships between the species of Androcymbium, especial-
ly those of section Erythrostictus, is an essential prerequi-
site to understanding the historical biogeography of the
genus.
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
205
Additional material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2922 (Prieska): Prieska, 05-1925, (-DA),
Bryant s.n. (BOL); Prieska, 10-1928, Bryant s.n. (PRE); Prieska, 07-35,
Bryant 1128 (PRE). 3023 (Britstown): De Aar, Quaggafontein, sandy
karoo in open patches, 06-05-1946, (-DB), Acocks 12604 (PRE). 3122
(Loxton): Meltonwold. northwest of Graskop, dry vlei, 13-05-1976,
(-DB), Thompson 3065 (PRE). 3123 (Victoria West): Richmond, 3 km
SE of town along road to Graaff-Reinet, seasonally waterlogged
drainage line in dolerite, 28-04-2001, (-BD), Manning 2322 (NBG); 27-
05-2001, Snijrnan 1815 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our thanks to C. Archer (PRE) and T. Trinder-Smith
(BOL) for expediting the loan of material from their
respective herbaria, B. Momberg, and the referees for
their efficiency, Roy Gereau for his incomparable Latin
diagnosis, and Dee Snijrnan for kindly collecting further
material. Material for study was collected on a permit
provided by Northern Cape Department of Nature and
Environmental Conservation.
REEERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1897. Liliaceae. Flora of tropical Africa 7: 559, 560.
DYER, R.A. 1956. Androcymbium roseutn. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 31; t. 1225.
KRAUSE, K. 1921. Revision der Gattung Androcymbium Willd.
Notizblatt des Botanischen Gartens and Museums zu Berlin-
Dahlem 70: 512-526.
MEYER, N. L. 2000. Colchicaceae. In O. A. Leistner, Seed plants of south-
ern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10.
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D. 1984. Zur Kennt-
nis der Gattung Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) im siidlichen
Afrika: Zwei Synonyma und fiinf neue Arten. Willdenowia 14:
179-197.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1998. Colchicaceae In K. Kubitzki, The families
and genera of vascular plants III Lilianae (except Orchi-
daceae). Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
PEDROLA-MONFORT, J. & CAUJAPE-CASTELLS, J. 1998. The
Androcymbium species of the Canary Islands. Curtis’s Botan-
ical Magazine 15: 61-11 .
ROESSLER, H. 1974. Die Gattung Androcymbium Willd. (Liliaceae)
in Sudwestafrika. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssamm-
lung, MUnchen 11: 545-566.
SEBSEBE DEMISSEW, S. 1997. Colchicaceae. Flora of Ethiopia and
Eritrea 6: 184-189.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI,
Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical
Garden, PO. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
PTERIDOPHYTA
NEW DISTRIBUTION RECORDS OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PTERIDOPHYTA
Recent travels by the authors have resulted in the col-
lection of a number of new national and provincial
records of pteridophytes from the southern African sub-
region which are not reflected in the most recent revi-
sions and regional checklists. The Malawian records
update Burrows & Burrows (1993); the South African
records update Burrows (1990) and Roux (1995), while
the Zambian records update Komas (1979). All speci-
mens are housed in the Buffelskloof Herbarium,
Lydenburg, South Africa; duplicates, where distributed,
are indicated.
MALAWI
Anogramma leptophylla (L. ) Link, Filicum species
in horto regio botanico berolinensis cultae; 137 (1841);
Schelpe: 99, t. 32 (1970); J.E.Burrows: 114, t. 26 (1990).
Type: South Europe, Toumefort 5337 (P, lecto.).
MALAWI. — 1033: (North), Nyika National Park, S slopes of
Nganda Hill, 2 480 m, (-BD), 31 March 2000, J.E. & S.M. Burrows
6850 (Buffelskloof Herb., MAL, NBG, SRGH, UZL).
This very small, ±10 mm tall annual fern, frequently
mistaken for sporelings of other ferns, was found grow-
ing in the lee of large boulders in montane grassland. It
is fairly widespread in Africa although, due to its
extremely small size, it is frequently overlooked. It has
been collected in South Africa and Zimbabwe to the
south, and northwards in Tanzania and Kenya.
Asplenium erectum Bory ex Willd. in Species
plantarum edn 5: 328 (1810); N.C.Anthony & Schelpe:
190 (1986); J.E.Burrows: 223, t. 51 (1990). Type:
Reunion, Bory s.n. (B-W19906, lecto.).
var. erectum.
MALAWI. — 1033: (North), Nyika National Park, Zovochipolo
Forest, 2 200 m, (-DA), 2 April 2000, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 6893
(Buffelskloof Herb.).
This specimen was found growing near a small stream
in the deep shade of evergreen montane forest. In addi-
tion to being a new record for Malawi, it is significant
that, in Africa, this variety was only previously known
from South Africa. It is not known from Zimbabwe or
southern Malawi and therefore represents an unusually
disjunct record into tropical Africa.
Cyathea mossambicensis Baker in Annals of
Botany 5: 185 (1891); Schelpe: 72 (1970); J.E.Burrows:
86, t. 18 (1990). Type: Mozambique, Namuli, Last s.n.
(K, holo.).
MALAWI. — 1134: (North), Mzuzu, ± 15 km from Mzuzu on the
Nkhata Bay road, (-CA), 14 May 1999, J.E. Burrows 6484
(Buffelskloof Herb.).
Plants were found growing in dense riverine forest
along a small stream, near the summit of the western
206
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
escarpment of the Lake Malawi rift above Nkhata Bay,
an area of unusually high rainfall in Malawi (Chapman &
White 1970). This is the first record of this taxon from
Malawi; elsewhere C mossamhicensis occurs in eastern
Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Tanzania.
Ophioglossum convexum J.E. Burrows in Bothalia
19: 167, t. 1 (1989). Type: South Africa, Mpumalanga,
Lydenburg Dist., Coromandel Farm, J.E. Burrows 3683
(PRE, holo.!; BOL!, K!).
MALAWI. — 1033: (North), Nyika National Park, Wowve River,
2 030 m. (-BD). 4 Apr. 2000, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 6909 (Buffelskloof
Herb., MAL. PRE, UZL).
This very small fern (trophophore 10-13 mm long) is
distinguished by its small suborbicular trophophores
which are held ± oppressed to the ground. It was found
growing in montane grassland on alluvial soils near a
river, growing in association with O. lusoafricanum
Welw. ex Prantl. It is currently known from South Africa
and Zimbabwe and this record therefore extends its
known distribution well into tropical Africa.
SOUTH AFRICA
Thelypteris dentata (Eorssk.) E.P.St.Johii van
buchananii Schelpe in Journal of South African Botany
31: 265 (1965), excl. Buchanan 8 [vide Holttum: 142
(1974)]; Schelpe: 198 (1970); J.E.Burrows: 264 (1990).
Type: Mozambique, Manica e Sofala, Garuso, ‘Jaegers-
berg’ (Bandula Mt), Schelpe 5599 (BOL, holo.!).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2831 (Nkandla): Ongoye Forest, (-DC), 18
Feb. 1996, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5944 (Buffelskloof Herb.).
Plants were found growing on a deeply shaded forest
floor in evergreen forest. Previously this variety was
only known from Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Malawi.
Van huchananii is distinguished from the typical variety
by having two or more pairs of veins anastomosing
below the sinus between the ultimate pinna lobes (com-
pared to I'A pairs, or 3 veins, in van dentata).
Thelypteris hispidula (Decne.) C.EReed in Phyto-
logia 17: 283 (1968); J.E.Burrows: 264, t. 64 (1990);
J.E.Burrows & S.M. Burrows: 95 (1993). Christella his-
pidula (Decne.) Holttum: 312 (1976). Type: Indonesia,
Timor, Guichenot s.n. (P, holo.).
Thelypteris quadrangularis (Fee) Schelpe: 196 (1964); Schelpe:
266 (1965); Schelpe: 195 (1970). Type: Guyana, Leprieur 182 (P,
?holo.; NY).
Christella hilsenhergii (C.Presl) Holttum: 142 (1974). Thelypteris
hilsenhergii (C.Presl) Panigrahi: 369 (1975). Type: Mauritius, Sieber
s.n. (PRC, holo.'; K, P).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2831 (Nkandla): Ongoye Forest, (-DC), 18
Feb, 1996, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5932 (Buffelskloof Herb.).
Growing in evergreen forest, in deeply shaded sites
along a stream. This is the first record of T. hispidula
from South Africa; previously this species had been
recorded as far south as Chirinda Forest in southeastern
Zimbabwe.
Polypodium vulgare L., Species plantarum 2: 1085
(1753); Schelpe & N.C. Anthony: 157 (1986); J.E.Bur-
rows: 193, t. 195 (1990). Type: Europe (not found).
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Lydenburg Dist., Moko-
bulaan Plantations, (-BA), 2 100 m, 26 Feb. 2000, J.E. Burrows, A. &
J. Nel 6716 (Buffelskloof Herb., J, NBG, PRE).
Polypodium vulgare is widespread throughout the
temperate zone of the northern hemisphere. Somewhat
anomalously it also occurs on the South Atlantic island
of Kerguelen, and in temperate South Africa, extending
from the mountains of the Western Cape to the high
Drakensberg Mountains of KwaZulu-Natal (Schelpe &
Anthony 1986). This new record extends the distribution
of the species northwards well beyond its current range.
Polystichum wilsonii H. Christ in Botanical Ga-
zette 51: 353 (1911); J.P.Roux: 149, t. 51 (1998). Type:
China, Szechuan Province, Mupin, Wilson 2614 (BM,
holo.).
Polystichum alticola Schelpe & N.C, Anthony in Anthony & Schelpe:
144 (1982); Schelpe & N.C. Anthony: 257 (1986): J.E.Buitows: 317
( 1990). Type: South Africa, Western Cape, Ladismith, Swartberg, Tower-
kop, Esterhuy.sen 26699 (BOL, holo.; C. G, GH, K, M, MO, NBG, P. PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg); Lydenburg Dist., Mokobu-
laan Plantations, (-BA), 2 100 m, 26 Feb. 2000, J.E. Burrows, A. & J.
Nel 6717 (Buffelskloof Herb., NBG).
This species occurs from the southern Cape moun-
tains through the mountains of the Drakensberg to the
Wakkerstroom area. Eurther north, P. wilsonii is repre-
sented in Zimbabwe by three collections. It then ‘jumps’
to northern Tanzania, Kenya, Ethiopia and westwards to
Cameroon and Bioko (Roux 1998). It is found also
through much of eastern Asia as far as China. The above
collection serves to close the preceived gap in its distrib-
ution between the Drakensberg Mountains of South
Africa and the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe.
ZAMBIA
Mohria marginalis (Savigny) J.PRoivc in South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 56: 401 (1990). Type: Reunion
(‘Bourbon’), Commerson s.n. (P, lecto.).
Mohria hirsuta J.P.Roux; 435 (1984). Type; South Africa. Free
State, Qwa Qwa, Tsheseng, near cave on road to The Sentinel, Roilx
907 (NBG. holo.; K, PRE).
ZAMBIA. — 1 124: North-Western Province, Luakela River, on road
from Mwinilunga to Ikalenge, (-CB), 4 March 1999, J.E. & S.M.
Burrows 6433 (Buffelskloof Herb.. NBG).
Plants were found growing in miombo (Brachystegia-
Julbernardia-Isoherlinia) woodland near a river, on a
rocky outcrop in light shade. This is 1210he first record
of this species from Zambia and the first record of any
species of Mohria from the western half of Zambia
(Kornas 1979). The woodland habitat of this collection is
anomalous for this taxon which is otherwise a montane
species (Roux 1995).
Ophioglossum ammophilum C.D. Adams in
Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 12, 7: 874
(1954). Type: Nigeria, Accra Dist., near Labadi, near
Kapeshi Lagoon, Adams GC4642 (BM, holo.!; K!).
ZAMBIA. — 0932: Northern Province, 52 km from Nakonde on the
Mbala road, (-AB), 14 Feb. 1995, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5796 (Buffels-
kloof Herb., K).
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
207
Plants were found growing on the outer margins of a
shallow seasonally inundated pan over laterite, in miom-
bo woodland, in association with Ophioglossum costa-
tum R.Br., O. lusoafricanum Welw. ex Prantl, O. thoma-
sii R.T.Clausen and O. vulgatum L. subsp. africanum
Pocock ex J.E. Burrows var. africanum. This is the first
record of this species for the southern African subregion;
previously it was known only from Nigeria, Sudan and
Ethiopia. Ophioglossum ammophilum is very similar to
O. gomezianum Welw. ex A. Braun but is distinguished
from that species in the field by its somewhat orange
tinge to the sporophore and the few pale basal-medial
cells on the tropophore, creating the impression of a
pseudo-midrib.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Fern Society of South Africa, particularly Allan
and Jolanda Nel, is acknowledged for their part in the
discovery of the two new Mpumalanga records; the
Parker and Engelbrecht families for access to
Mokobulaan; and J.P. (Koos) Roux for confirming the
identification of Mohria marginalis. The Southern
African Botanical Diversity Network (SABONET) is
thanked for providing the opportunity to visit northern
Malawi.
REFERENCES
ADAMS. C.D. 1954. New species of ferns from the Gold Coast.
Annals and Magazine of Natural History. ser.l2, 7: 874.
ANTHONY, N.C. & SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1982. New species and
new combinations in African Pteridophyta and Orchidaceae.
Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium No. 10: 143-164.
BAKER, J.G. 1891. A summary of the new ferns which have been dis-
covered or described since 1874. Annals of Botany 5: 185.
BURROWS. J.E. 1989. New taxa, combinations and records of Pteri-
dophyta from southern and central Africa. Bothalia 19;
167-174.
BURROWS. J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frand-
sen Publishers, Sandton.
BURROWS, J.E. & BURROWS, S.M. 1993. An annotated checklist of
the pteridophytes of Malawi. Kirkia 14: 78-99.
CHAPMAN, J.D. & WHITE, F. 1970. The evergreen forests of Malawi.
Commonwealth Forestry Institute. University of Oxford.
CHRIST, K.H.H, 1911. Fihces wilsonianae. Botanical Gazette 5 1 : 345-359.
HOLTTUM, R.E. 1974. Thelypteridaceae of Africa and adjacent
islands. Journal of South African Botany 40: 123-168.
HOLTTUM. R.E. 1976. The genus Christella Leveille, sect. Christella.
Studies in the family Thelypteridaceae, XL Kew Bulletin 31:
293-339.
KORNAS, J. 1979. Distribution and ecology of the pteridophytes in
Zambia. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Krakow.
LINK, J.H.F 1841 . Filicum species in horto regio botanico beroliinen-
sis cultae. Berolini.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum 2, edn 1. Holmiae.
PANIGRAHI. G. 1975. Notes on certain taxa of Thelypteris (Thelyp-
teridaceae) of Asia, II. Phytologia 31: 369-372.
REED, C.F 1968. Index thelypteridis. Phytologia 17: 249^66.
ROUX, J.P. 1984. Mohria hirsuta, a new fern species from the
Drakensberg. Journal of South African Botany 50: 435^141.
ROUX, J.P. 1990. A new species and combination in Mohria
(Schizaeaceae: Pteridophyta). South African Journal of Botany
56: 399^02.
ROUX. J.P. 1995. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pterido-
phyta: Anemiaceae). VI. Taxonomic review. Bothalia 25: 1-12.
ROUX, J.P. 1998, A taxonomic revision of Polystichum (Pteropsida:
Dryopteridaceae) in Africa and neighbouring islands. Ph.D.
thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1964. Pteridophyta collected on an expedition
to northern Mozambique. Journal of South African Botany 30:
177-200.
SCHELPE. E.A.C.L.E. 1965. A review of the southern African species
of Thelypteris. Journal of South African Botany 31: 259-269.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1970. Pteridophyta. In A.W. Exell & E. Launert,
Flora zambesiaca. Crown Agents, London.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. Flora
of southern Africa. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1810. In Carol! a Linne, Species plantarum edn 5.
Berolini.
J.E. BURROWS* and S.M. BURROWS*
* Buffelskloof Herbarium, RO. Box 710, 1 120 Lydenburg, South Africa.
MS. received: 2000-09-26.
GENTIANACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF SEBAEA FROM THE SWARTBERG RANGE, WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
Sebaea amicorum I.M.Oliv. & Beyers, sp. nov., in
genere distincta foliis lanceolatis, floribus 4-meris,
calyce minute carinata, antheris glande apicali minutissi-
ma, stylo sine tumore stigmatico dignoscenda. Figura 13.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3322 (Oudtshoom): Oudts-
hoom, Groot Swartberg, neck just SE of Witberg on
Angeliers Berg 187, 1 710 m, (-AC), 18 October 2000,
E.G.H. & I.M.Oliver 11716 (NBG, holo.; K).
Delicate herbaceous biennial, or perennial (?), vary-
ing from small, ± 50 mm tall and 2-4-branched to
100-200 mm tall and many branched, main stem 10-150
X ± 2 mm. Branches: few to many, thin, delicate, erect,
long main and secondary branches all glabrous with 2-A
longitudinal ridges, intemodes 4—10 mm long. Leaves
well developed, scattered along stem, opposite, spread-
ing, basal ones often reflexed, sessile, narrowly lanceo-
late, 5-12 X 1-2 mm, acute, flat, glabrous, midrib slight-
ly prominent on abaxial surface only, margins micro-
scopically dentate or entire. Inflorescence 1 -flowered or
a lax dichasium of 1st and 2nd order, sometimes 3rd
order, at ends of all branches; 1st order peduncle 10-30
mm long, 2nd order peduncles 5-25 mm long, 3rd order
peduncles 5-10 mm long; flowers 4-merous, ± 13 mm
long, yellow; bracts subtending flower subspreading ±
3. 5-5.0 X 1.0 mm, leaf-like; pedicel very short, ± 0.5 mm
long. Calyx 4-partite, free, adpressed to corolla, seg-
ments elliptic to ovate, ± 7.0 x 2. 6-3. 5 mm, acute, veins
not visible, slightly keeled abaxially, keel 0.2-0.3 mm
broad, green centrally, becoming hyaline towards mar-
gins, glabrous, margins entire. Corolla 4-lobed; tube ± 4
mm long, shorter than lobes; lobes elliptic to ovate,
8.0-9.0 X 4.5 mm, subacute. Stamens 4, inserted in corol-
208
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
FIGURE 13. — Sebaea amicorum. A, flowering branch; B, stem with leaves; C, closed flower; D. bracts; E. sepal; F. corolla, opened and viewed
adaxially; G. stamen, back, side and front views; H. gynoecium; I, seed. All drawn from the type collection. Scale bars; B. D. E. G. FI. 2
mm; C, F, 4 mm; 1. 0.5 mm. Artist; I.M. Oliver.
la sinuses; filaments ± 1 .5 mm long; anthers ± 2.4 mm
long, apex slightly recurved with very small sessile
round apical gland, basal glands absent, thecae fully
adnate. Ovary 2-locular, ellipsoid, 2. 5^.0 x 1.2-2. 5
mm, glabrous, with numerous ovules; style 6. 2-8. 5 mm
long, filiform, with no stigmatic swelling; stigma capi-
tate, ± 0.4 X 0.5 mm, 2-lobed. Seeds ± ovoid, ± 0.4 x 0.2
mm, with many frilly small wings. Flowering time:
October to December. Figure 13.
This new species is at first glance very distinct from
all others in the genus mainly due to its leaves which are
narrowly lanceolate and evenly distributed on the
branches and to the large flowers. It is related to S. capi-
tcita Cham. & SchltdI. and S. laxa N.E.Br. which also
have 4-merous flowers.
Sehaea capitatci is a more robust plant with thicker
stems and with a different leaf shape — elliptic-ovate or
ovate, cordate, 3-14 mm broad, with a distinct petiole,
whereas S. amicorum has naiTOwly lanceolate leaves 1-2
mm broad, which are sessile. The sepals of S. capitata
have a keel which is ± 1.2 mm broad compared to the
very naiTow keel, ± 0. 2-0.3 mm broad, in the new
species. S. capitata has inflorescences which are dense
and compact with short peduncles, whereas E. amicorum
has a loose open inflorescence. The anthers are similar in
both species in that they have a minute apical gland, but
the new species has much longer thecae — 2.4 mm com-
pared to 1 .5 mm long. S. capitata has a style without or
rarely with a stigmatic swelling and in S. amicorum there
is no swelling.
Well-developed plants of S. laxa appear very similar
to those of E. amicorum in that they are delicate and
somewhat bushy, with similar lax secondary branching
and with the inflorescences having similar secondary
branching. However, the leaves of S. laxa are ovate, 2-6
mm broad, l-3-nerved abaxially, even though they are
similarly scattered over the whole plant. The flowers of
S. laxa are much shorter and more delicate. Both species
have an equally narrow keel down the sepals. Major dif-
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
209
900 - 1500 m h
r~l 300 • 900 m .
I 1 Under 300 m |
FIGURE 14. — Known distribution
of Sebaea amicoriim.
ferences between the two species occur in the anthers
with 5. la.xa having short thecae 1.0-1. 2 mm long, the
apex much recurved with a large apical gland hanging on
a short thread-like stalk. There is also a stigmatic
swelling on the style in 5. laxa which is absent in the new
species.
Apart from one unnamed collection, Esterhuysen
36120a, from Towerkop [Toverkop] in the Klein
Swartberg, which has 5-merous flowers and a large api-
cal and basal gland on the thecae and ovate leaves, no
other Sebaea species has been recorded from the very
long Swartberg Mountain Range from near Ladismith to
almost Willowmore. 5. amiconim is represented by sev-
eral collections from this Range but in two distinct
areas — the Klein Swartberg above Ladismith and the
region just east of the Swartberg Pass (Figure 14). Two
of the peaks cited by Esterhuysen and Stokoe,
Koudeveldberg (Koudeberg) and Krevasberg, cannot be
located on any map.
In the Flora of southern Africa, Marais & Verdoom
(1963) cite under S. capitata var. sclerosepala (Schinz)
Marais a collection, Esterhuysen 28035, from the Cocks-
comb in the Great Winterhoek Mtns. This was found to
be clearly the same as the new species, but is far removed
from the other two areas. This feature is not surprising in
the genus Sebaea in which many species have very wide
and disjunct distributions.
The species has been recorded by Esterhuysen from
ledges, the base of cliffs and shady gullies mostly on the
southern slopes of the Klein Swartberg at altitudes
between 5500 and 6500 ft [1 670 and 1 980 m]. Linder
recorded ‘shady, mossy S-facing ledges’. The type popu-
lation was found on a moist stony S-facing slope just
below the summit ridge in short grassy/restioid vegeta-
tion that had been burnt the previous year. The
Cockscomb collection came from ‘steep rocky SE
slopes, marshy spot in gully’.
This new species is named amicorum = of the friends,
because we have been closely involved as colleagues in
the herbarium for the last 15 years.
Paratype material
WESTERN CAPE.— 3321 (Ladismith): Klein Swartberg,
Towerkop, 5500-6000 ft [1 670-1 830 m], (-AC), 16-12-1956,
Esterhuysen 26748 (BOL); ridge E of Towerkop, 2 000 m, (-AC), 7-
02-1992, Linder 5518 (PRE, photocopy); E. of Towerkop facing
Elandsberg, 6000-6500 ft [1 830-1 980 m], (-AC/AD), 29-03-1964,
Esterhuysen 30665 (BOL); ridge from Kouveldberg to Towerkop, ±
6500 ft [1 980 m], (-AC/AD), 31-04-1964, Esterhuysen 30669 (BOL);
between Towerkop and Elandsberg/Koudeveldberg. 6000 ft [1 830 m],
(-AC/AD), 28-03-1959, Esterhuysen 28244 (BOL). 3322
(Oudtshoorn): Swartberg Pass area, Krevasberg, summit, (-?AC), 12-
1942, Stokoe 8996 (BOL).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville); Great Winterhoek Mtns,
Cockscomb. 5500 ft [1 670 m], (-DB), 30-1 1-1958, Esterhuysen 28035
(BOL).
REFERENCE
MARAIS, W. & VERDOORN, I.C. 1963. Sebaea. Elora of southern
Africa 26: 171-211.
I.M. OLIVER* and J.B.P. BEYERS*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town. MS. received: 2001-05-16.
FABACEAE
THE IDENTITY OE MELOLOBIUM LAMPOLOBUM (PAPILIONOIDEAE)
The genus Melolobium is currently being revised and
a comprehensive survey of the literature and herbarium
specimens has revealed a poorly known species that was
recently re-collected. The species was listed by Bentham
(1844) as a synonym of M. collinum Eckl. & Zeyh. and
by Harvey (1862) as a variety of M. microphyllum Eckl.
& Zeyh., but our studies have shown it to be distinct. The
identity of the plant became quite apparent when the
original material was discovered in the Paris Herbarium.
One of Drege’s types clearly shows the diagnostically
different pods of the species. When E. Meyer (Eeb.1836)
described the genus Sphingium, it had already been
described a month earlier as Melolobium by Ecklon &
Zeyher (Jan. 1836). In subsequent publications some of
Meyer’s names appear to have been overlooked.
There are two Drege’s specimens in the Paris Her-
barium. Drege 6463 (Figure 15 A) is a flowering speci-
men with no locality label, Drege s.n. (Figure 15B) is a
fruiting specimen with the locality label ‘Kendo’ in
210
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
Mulolohiiim lampolnhiim (E Mey ) A Moteelce & B-E.
Dct. A Moteetee
05/02/2001
Wyk
A
Melolobhim lampolohimi (E Mey.) A, Molcclec & B-E. van
Del. A. Moteetee
0.5/02/2001
Wyk
B
FIGURE 15. — Type specimens of Melolohiwn lampolobum in the Paris Herbarium. A. flowering specimen, Drege 6463 (syntype); B, fruiting
specimen Drege s.n. (lectotype).
Drege’s handwriting. Because of the diagnostic impor-
tance of the fruit and the unambiguous type locality
details, the latter is here chosen as lectotype.
Melolobium lampolobum (E.Mey.) A.Moteetee &
B-E.van Wyk, comb. nov. Type: Western Cape, 3322
(Oudtshoom): ‘Kendo’, (-BD), Drege s.n. (P!, specimen
with pods, lectotype, here designated); Drege 6463 (P!,
specimen with flowers, syntype).
Sphingium lampolobum E.Mey.: 67 (Feb. 1836). M. microphyUwn
L. var. lampolobum (E.Mey.) Harv,; 79 (1862).
Woody, strongly spinescent shrublet up to 0.6 m high.
Leaves stipulate; leaflets oblong to broadly obovate,
(3-)5-9 X 2-A mm, glabrous, apex somewhat mucronate
to emarginate; petiole 2-5 mm long; stipules semi-cor-
date to auriculate, 1-4 x 1-2 mm. Inflorescence slender,
terminal, 40-60 mm long, many-flowered raceme
(10-16 flowers); llowers 7-10 mm long; bracts ovate-
lanceolate, 2-3 X 0.5-1 .0 mm; bracteoles narrowly ovate
to lanceolate, 2-3 x 0.5-0. 7 mm. Calyx shortly bilabiate,
glandular with sessile glands, very sparsely hairy; upper
lobes acute, 5-6 mm long, apices obtuse, upper sinus 2-3
mm deep; lower lobes acute, 6-7 mm long, apices
obtu.se, lower sinuses 0.2-1 .0 mm deep. Corolla yellow;
standard suborbicular, 6-8 x 4-5 mm, with well-devel-
oped, channelled claw, 2-3 mm long; wing petals
oblong, sculptured, 7-8 x 2-3 mm, with linear claw 3—4
mm long; keel petals shortly half-oblong, apically round-
ed, 3^ X 2-3 mm, with linear claw 3— f mm long.
Amlroeciwn monadelphous, split on its upper side, con-
sisting of four long, basifixed anthers and six short, dor-
sifixed anthers (alternating with the carinal, intermediate
one). Gynoecium narrowly oblong, 3. 0-3. 5 mm long,
hairy, with 4 or 5 ovules; style curved, 3^ mm long.
Endl broadly falcate, strongly compressed, 12-18 x 2-4
mm, without glands, almost glabrous, surface distinctly
shiny, 2-4-seeded; seeds discoid, light brown, 2. 3-2. 5
mm diam. (side view). Figure 16.
Diagnostic characters: the shiny pod of the aptly
named M. lainpolohinn is a very useful diagnostic feature.
Unlike many other related species, the pods are devoid of
both sessile and stalked glands. The glabrous, obcordate
leaflets and general morphology indicate an affinity to M.
exudans Harv., the only other species in the entire genus
with glabrous leaves. M. lampolobum differs from the lat-
ter in the strongly spiny, curved branches (slightly spiny
in M. exudans), pubescent stems (glabrous in M. exudans)
and glabrescent pods (glandular and hairy in M. exudans).
Because of its branching pattern and the rigid spines, this
species can be confused with M. candicans (E. Mey.)
Eckl. & Zeyh., from which it differs in the dark brown
and pubescent branches (distinctly white-tomentose in
most forms of the latter), larger leaves, falcate, shiny pods
(straight and densely hairy in M. candicans) and longer
inflorescences with more flowers.
Distribution and habitat: the known distribution of M.
lampolobum is shown in Figure 17. It occurs at lower alti-
tudes near Robertson and further northeast in the moun-
tains of the Little Karoo in the southern part of Western
Cape, extending from the western end of Anysberg along
the Klein and Groot Swartberg Mountains as far east as
Oudtshoom. The plants grow in mountain karoo scrub
and on rocky slopes, at altitudes of 900 to over 1 500 m.
Additional specimens e.xamined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Vrolijkheid. Robertson.
(-DD). Van der Merwe 3001 (PRE). 3320 (Montagu): Karoo Garden.
Whitehill. (-BA). Compton 11213 (NBG): western end of Anysberg at
Booplaas Earm. (-BC). C.M. van Wyk 1080 (PRE); 16.6 km SSE of
Laingsburg. (-BD). B-E. van Wyk2143, 2145 (JRAU). 3321 (Ladismith):
Ladismith. (-AD), Baylis.s 2817 (NBG); Groot Swardberg. (-BD),
Marshall 234 (JRAU. PRE); Swartberg Mountains next to Gamkaskloof,
(-BD), Vlok 1489 (PRE); range N of Sandberg. (-DA), Wurt.s 1393
(NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the curators of the cited herbaria for loans
of specimens. The Government of Lesotho and the
National Research Foundation are thanked for financial
support.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
211
FIGURE 16. — Melolobium lampolobum. A. abaxial view of leaf with stipules; B. adaxial view of young leaf with stipules; C. lateral view of
flower; Dl, abaxial view of bract; D2 abaxial view of bracteoles; E. calyx opened out with upper lobes to left; F, standard petal; G, wing
petal; H. keel petal; II, long, basifixed anther; 12, carinal (intermediate) anther; 13, short, dorsifixed anther; J, pistil; K, lateral view of pod.
Scale bars: A-K. 1 mm.
HEIGHT ABOVE SEA LEVEL
EM Over 1500 m
900 - 1500 m
300 - 900 m
I I Under 300 m
0 20 40 60 00 100 km
FIGURE 17. — The known distribu-
tion of Melolobium lampolo-
bwn.
212
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1844. Enumeration of Leguminosae, indigenous to
southern Asia and central and southern Africa. In J.D. Hooker.
London Journal of Botany 3: 350-353.
ECKLON, C.F. & ZEYHER, C.L.R 1836. Emimeratio plantaruin
Africae australis extratropicae: 188-190. Perthes & Besser,
Hamburg.
HARVEY, W.H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sender,
Flora capensis 2: 77-81. Hodges Smith, Dublin.
MEYER, E.H.F. 1836. Commentariorum de plantis Africae aus-
tralioris: 65-67. Leopoldum Voss, Leipzig.
A. MOTEETEE* and B-E. VAN WYK*
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524,
2006 Auckland Park, Johannesburg.
MS. received: 2001-03-19.
Bothalia 31,2: 213-236 (2001)
Taxonomic significance of inflorescences, floral morphology and
anatomy in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae)
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: anatomy, androecium, exotegmen, flower, gynoecium, morphology, Passerina, phylogeny, taxonomy, Thymelaeaceae, vasculation
ABSTRACT
Comparative studies were undertaken on the inflorescence, bracts and floral morphology of all taxa of the genus
Passerina L. in southern Africa. Information is given in tabular form and a key based on bract morphology is pre.sented.
Floral morphology supported the status of the infrageneric taxa and also proved to be of taxonomic significance in the
genus. Controversy surrounding the interpretation of a number of floral morphological structures in Passerina has been
resolved. Morphological and anatomical evidence allowed a re-interpretation of the structure of the receptacle, hypanthium
and sepals, ovary type and position, structure of the seed coat, ovule type and position, obturator, fruit and seed. On this
basis an authentic generic description of the floral morphology was compiled. Passerina is distinguished by the following
set of characters, a very short floral receptacle, tubular hypanthium, petaloid calyx, absence of petals and petaloid scales,
diplostemonous dimorphic androecium, extrorse anthers, superior ovary, anatropous, ventrally epitropous ovule, an obturator
of elongated cells, a 1 -seeded berry or an achene and tegmic seed with nuclear endosperm becoming cellular throughout.
On this basis the flower in Passerina is considered a phylogenetically advanced structure, supporting the view that the genus
is advanced within the Thymelaeoideae. The proposed taxonomic relationship between Thymelaeaceae and Malvales is
confirmed by floral morphological evidence.
CONTENTS
Introduction 213
Materials and methods 216
Terminology 216
Phylogeny 216
Results 216
Inflorescences 216
Bracts 218
Key to taxa based on bract characters 218
Generic description of floral morphology 219
Generic description of floral anatomy (as seen in
transverse section) 219
Floral morphology at species level 223
Discussion 223
Inflorescence 223
Bracts 223
Floral morphology and anatomy at generic level . 223
Floral and fruit morphology at species level .... 232
Less important taxonomic characters 234
Taxonomic relationships 234
Speculations on phylogeny 235
Systematic value 235
Conclusions 235
Acknowledgements 236
References 236
INTRODUCTION
The infrageneric taxonomy of Passerina L. is a prob-
lem, due to the apparent lack of marked morphological
differences between species. The latest revision by
Thoday (1924), is now mostly outdated.
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag XlOl. 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium. Department of Botany, Univer-
sity of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2000-08-22.
Most species of Passerina are endemic to the Cape
Floristic Region and adapted to a Mediterranean or semi-
Mediterranean climate. The distribution of P. sp. nov. 4
and P montana extends eastwards and northwards along
the eastern mountains and Great Escarpment of southern
Africa, predominantly summer rainfall areas. The
species are apparently all wind-pollinated.
The controversy surrounding the interpretation of
certain floral structures in the genus became obvious
during the present study. Heinig (1951) did not include
Passerina in her study of the floral morphology of the
Thymelaeaceae. From the sexual system of Linnaeus (1781,
1784) to Domke (1934), floral morphology played an
integral part in the intrafamilial classification of the
Thymelaeaceae and in the circumscription of the family
(Table 1). Between ± 1960 and 1996, vast leaps were
taken in the classification of the flowering plants by
making use of anatomical, floral, palynological, embryo-
logical and chemical evidence. During this period, dis-
agreement on the circumscription of the Thymelaeaceae
was common (Table 2). Since 1990, many higher-level
phylogenetic relationships in angiosperms were based on
evidence from rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA
sequence data. In many cases these studies confirmed
previously proposed phylogenetic patterns and trends
within the family, based on morphological evidence; in
other cases, however, profound changes in the circum-
scription and relationships of the Thymelaeaceae were
suggested (Table 3).
The present paper emanated from a monographic
study of the genus currently in progress. Available evi-
dence suggests the presence of at least four new species
and four new subspecies, to be added to 16 previously
recognized species, mostly endemic to southern Africa
(Thoday 1924; Bond & Goldblatt 1984) (Table 4). Here
we report on a comparative morphological study of the
inflorescence, bract, flower, fruit and seed. Specific
Classitication of Passerimi within the Thymelaeaceae according to different authors, based mainly on floral, fruit and .seed morphology
214
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
black, crustaceous testa,
micropyle beak-like
TABLE 2, — Classification of Passerina within tlie Thymelaeaceae according to different authors, based on morphological, anatomical, palynological, embryological and chemical characters
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
215
216
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
TABLE 3. — Classification of the Thymelaeaceae according to different authors, based on molecular data
* Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
results in leaf anatomy, indicating the arrangement of
taxa in Passerimi (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001), are
associated with floral morphological structures as well as
fruit and seed types in the present study,
MATERIALS AND METHODS
As far as possible, material was collected from at least
five different localities for every taxon. Live and pre-
served (dried and in liquid preservatives) material of all
the species, subspecies and varieties in Passerimi was
studied (Table 4). Illustrations were made from herbari-
um material by means of a drawing tube. Measurements
were taken by using a dissection microscope and a cali-
brated eyepiece.
Flowers were fixed and stored in a 0. 1 M phosphate-
buffered solution at pH 7.4, containing 2.5% formalde-
hyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde and 0.5% caffeine [modified
Karnovsky fixative; Karnovsky (1965)]. Light micro-
scopy (LM) was used to study the floral anatomy of P.
ericoides (Bredenkamp 956, 962), which has fleshy fruit
and P. vulgaris (Bredenkamp 944, 951) with dry fruit. As
the flowers are quite small, whole flower buds, flowers
directly after anthesis and young fruits enveloped in the
floral tube were washed in water, dehydrated and embed-
ded in glycol methacrylate (GMA) following the meth-
ods of Feder & O’Brien ( 1968). Embedded floral mater-
ial was serially sectioned from the base of the receptacle
to the anthers. Sections were stained in toluidine blue
‘O’, subjected to the periodic acid-Schiff’s (PAS) reaction
and mounted in Entellan (Art. 7961, E. Merck, Damstadt).
Terminology
Terminology is used according to the following
authorities: inflorescences (Weberling 1983, 1989;
Weberling & Herkommer 1989); hypanthium (Bunniger
1972; Dahlgren 1975a, b, 1980; Dahlgren & Thorne 1984);
stamen morphology (Heinig 1951; Fahn 1967; Noel 1983);
gynoecium (Heinig 1951; Davis 1966; Comer 1976); fruit
(Spjut 1994).
Floral envelope
The authors regard the floral envelope (‘outer floral
whorl’) as a hypanthium (fused calyx and androecium),
differentiating into four petaloid sepals and a diploste-
monous androecium, arising from the hypanthium rim at
the separation of the sepals. For the description of colour,
texture and measurement of total floral length, only the
hypanthium and sepals are considered — the stamens are
excluded.
Phylogeny
Speculations on phylogeny are based on prevailing
family characters representing the ancestral state and
derived characters, indicating a reduction in tissue at
genus and species levels, considered as possibly
advanced. A cladistic analysis based on anatomical and
morphological characters in Passerina is scheduled for
the final stages of the study.
RESULTS
Inflorescences
Polytelic synflorescences present in all species; main
florescences and co-florescences spicate (Figures 1 A; 2A),
often extended, forming multiflowered politelic flores-
cences in most species, sometimes strongly reduced
(P. hurchellii) (Table 5). Proliferating spikes with inflores-
cence apex growing out and returning to vegetative growth,
common; main florescences and co-florescences subtenni-
nal. Spikes sometimes artificially resembling terminal sub-
capitulate inflore.scences, but each characterized by two
terminal leaves with axillary blind-ending mdimentary
flowers, enveloping minute growing point (P. montana, P.
paleacea, P. glomerata, P. sp. nov. 3); proliferating growth
less common in subcapitulate inflorescences.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
217
TABLE 4. — Passerina specimens examined and housed at PRE
Species
burchellii Thoday
comosa C.H. Wright
drakensbergensis Hilliard
& B.L.Burtt
ericoides L.
falcifolia C.H. Wright
filifonnis L. snbs.p. filifbnnis
filiformis L. subsp. nov.
galpinii C.H. Wright
Collector
Bredenkamp 1545
Bolus 687*. Stokoe 2542
Thoday 212
Andreae 1288*,
MacDonald 2125
Edwards 974
Bredenkamp 1018, 1019.
1020. 1021*
Bredenkamp 956'
Bredenkamp 962'*
Taylor 4042
Bredenkamp 917*
Bredenkamp 915
Tyson 1449
Boucher 2833
Bredenkamp 1039*
Schlechter 5125*
TaMor 1542
Bredenkamp 946*
Bredenkamp 932
Bredenkamp 933
Bredenkamp 923
Bredenkamp 988
Bredenkamp 994
Bredenkamp 1002
Bredenkamp 984, 985*
Bredenkamp 977
Bredenkamp 973*
glomerata Thunb. subsp. nov. Stokoe 8040
Esterhuvsen 28587*
glomerata Thunb. subsp.
glomerata
montana Thoday
obtusifolia Thoday
paleacea Wikstr.
paludosa Thoday
pendula Eckl. & Zeyh.
rigida Wikstr.
rubra C.H.Wright
vulgaris Thoday
sp. nov. 1
sp. nov. 2
sp. nov. 3
sp. nov. 4
Giess 13136
Bredenkamp 1024
Bredenkamp 1025
Bredenkamp 889. 890
Bredenkamp 893*
Bredenkamp 971
Bredenkamp 967
Bredenkamp 1033, 1034
Bredenkamp 929
Bredenkamp 919*
Bredenkamp 960*
Bredenkamp 961
Bredenk inp 952
Bredenkamp 950
Bredenkamp 949
Bredenkamp 940
Bredenkamp 1035
Jangle 156*
Thoday 100
Fourcade 3043
Bredenkamp 908. 909*
Ward 7211
Bredenkamp 1013*
Bredenkamp 899
Bredenkamp 898
Bredenkamp 897
Bredenkamp 911
Bredenkamp 914*
Bredenkamp 905
Bredenkamp 900
Bredenkamp 926
Bredenkamp 907
Bredenkamp 901
Bredenkamp 95h
Bredenkamp 944'*
Bredenkamp 924
Locality
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Jonaskop. (-DC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Baviaanskloof, Genadendal. (-BA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Montagu District, near Concordia. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Seweweekspoort. (-AD).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park. (-DB).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2829 (Harrismith): Ndedema Gorge. Cathedral Peak Forest
Reserve. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Milnerton. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Cape Maclear, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Pearly Beach. (-CB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): Gouna State Forest. (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville): opposite Tsitsikama Lodge. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3423 (Knysna): Knysna. (-AA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Van Rhynsdorp): Clanwilliam Dist.. Diepkloof S of Verlore-
vlei. (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Signal Hill. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Alexander's Hoek. (-BC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Malmesbury Div.. Vredenburg. Steenberg's
Cave. (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): De Hoop Nature Reserve. (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): Riethuiskraal, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): Still Bay. (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3422 (Mossel Bay): Mossel Bay, (-AA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Cederberg Mountains. Eikeboom, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Cederberg Mountains. Kromrivier, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Cederberg Mountains. Algeria. (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Citrusdal. Piekenierskloof Pass. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Groenfontein. (-DC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Tulbagh. (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Cederberg Mountains.
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Hex River Mountains.
NAMIBIA. — 2217 (Windhoek): Auas Mountains. Molteblick, (-CA).
MPUMALANGA.— 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): World’s View, (-DD).
MPUMALANGA. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): God’s Window. (-DD).
FREE STATE. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Golden Gate National Park. (-DA).
FREE STATE. — 2927 (Maseru): Ladybrand. (-AB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Karoo National Botanical Garden. (-CB).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3319 (Worcester): Jonaskop. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Laingsburg): Seweweekspoort. (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3321 (Ladismith): Rooiberg, (-CB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Perdepoort. (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Kommetjie. (-AB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Cape Maclear, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Harold Porter National Botanical Garden, (-BD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): Waenhuiskrans, (-CA).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3421 (Riversdale): Puntjie, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Rondevlei Nature Reserve, (-BA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Rondevlei Nature Reserve, (-BA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Riet Valley, Cape Flats, (-BA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville): Zuur Anys, (-CB).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Groendal Nature Reserve, (-CB).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2832 (Mtubatuba): St Lucia Park, (-AD).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 3130 (Port Edward): Umtamvuna River Mouth, (-AA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3326 (Grahamstown): Kenton-on-Sea, (-DA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3326 (Grahamstown): Port Alfred, (-DB).
EASTERN CAPE.— 3327 (Peddie): Kleinmond West, (-CA).
EASTERN CAPE, — 3424 (Humansdorp): Jeffreys Bay, (-BB).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville): en route to Kareedouw, (-CD).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Colchester. (-DB).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3326 (Grahamstown): Grahamstown. (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): en route to Korenthe River Dam. (-CC).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Groendal Nature Reserve, (-CB),
EASTERN CAPE. — 3326 (Grahamstown): Grahamstown, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Betty’s Bay, Harold Porter NBG, (-BD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3420 (Bredasdorp): Cape Infanta. (-BD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3422 (Mosselbaai): Kleinbrak. (-AA).
Goldblatt & Manning 8627 WESTERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): Roggeveld Escarpment. (-AB).
Bredenkamp 1044, 1046,
1047
Oliver 9281*
Esterhuvsen 12189, 26859*
Stokoe 9302
Schlechter 5846
Esterhuvsen 10734*
Esterhuvsen 28006*
Killick 238
Bredenkamp 1016, 1017
Van Wvk & Bredenkamp
1, 1012
Bredenkamp 1327*
Gillett 4537
Keet s.n.
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Waboomberg. Ceres, (-AD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Northern Cederberg Mountains, (-BB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Swartberg Pass, Prince Albert area, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoom): Montagu Pass, (-CD).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): Kouga Mountains. (-DA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville): Cockscomb, Uitenhage area, (-BD).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Table Mountain, (-CB).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 3030 (Port Shepstone): Oribi Gorge, (-CB).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 3130 (Port Edward): Umtamvuna River Bridge. (-AA).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 3130 (Port Edward): Mkambati Nature Reserve, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3422 (Mossel Bay): en route to Knysna from George, (-BB),
WESTERN CAPE.— 3423 (Knysna): Knysna. Redlands. (-AA).
Illustrated specimens; • specimens used for light microscopy.
218
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 1 . — Passerina ericoides.
A-G, Bredenkamp 962. A,
young inflorescence; B, leaf
exposing adaxial surface; C,
bract exposing adaxial sur-
face; D, fruiting branchlet; E,
flower enveloped by bract; E,
fleshy one-seeded berry; G,
seed with black tegmen and
white fragment of endocarp.
A, D, X 10; B, C, E-G, x 20.
Scale bars: 10 mm.
Bracts
Arrangement subterminal in proliferating spikes,
pseudoterminal in subcapitulate spikes; youngest bracts
closest to growing point, enlarging along florescence
axis; bracts enveloping flowers and fruits (Figures lA,
D, E; 2 A, D), largest after anthesis of flowers, becom-
ing more coriaceous and rounded at fruit set, gradually
acquiring leaf shape at proximal end of florescence
axis, decussate, sessile, imbricate, often conspicuously
enlarged, resulting in longer spikes (P.falcifolia, P.fili-
forrnis, P. sp. nov. 4, P. rubra). Lamina inversely ericoid;
adaxial surface (inside) concave, facing inflorescence
axis, abaxial surface (outside) convex; cymbiform (boat-
shaped) or helmet-shaped; in outline (plane shape), ob-
long, lanceolate, ovate and obovate to widely ovate and
obovate, rhombic and narrowly obtrullate to obtrullate
(Figures 3; 4; Table 5); bracts without leaf-like point,
length X 'L width (2.5-)3.5^.5(-5.5) x (0.9-)1.0-1.5(-2.4)
mm; bracts with leaf-like point, length x 'A width (4.0-)
5.1-6.3(-7.3) X (1.4-)1.5-2.0(-2.6) mm; outside glabrous,
seldom tomentose {P. comosa, P. sp. nov. 3), inside, base
or midrib tomentose with glabrous wings or completely
comose, tomentose, villous or setose; trichomes nong-
landular, uniseriate, mostly strongly spiralled, white;
coriaceous or chartaceous, rugose or smooth, ± succu-
lent or thin, outline of epidermal cells often macroscop-
ically visible; often ± 3-5-ribbed or reticulately veined
on each side of main vein. Wings absent, or bordering
lamina or distinct from lamina and conspicuously
rounded or bullate; mostly glabrous, coriaceous, charta-
ceous or membranous, often straw-coloured and rosy-
tinged. Base sessile or cuneate. Midrib strongly devel-
oped, forming spine of cymbiform bract, often keeled,
extending to form a leaf-like point in many species.
Apex obtuse, rounded or acute, mostly coriaceous.
Margins often ciliate to setose (P. burchellii, P. sp. nov.
4, P. pendiila).
EIGURE 2. — Passerina vulgaris,
Bredenkamp 944. A, inflores-
cence; B, leaf exposing adax-
ial surface; C, bract exposing
abaxial surface; D, flower
enveloped by bract; E, fruit
enveloped by hypanthium,
with fragmentation at neck
base; F, achene; G, seed with
black tegmen and white
spots. A, X 10; B-G, x 20.
Scale bars: 10 mm.
Key to taxa based on bract characters (Figures 3; 4; Table 5)
la Bracts hairy outside P. conwsa (Figure 3A), P. sp. nov. 3 (Figure 3B, C)
lb Bracts glabrous outside:
2a Bracts shorter than 4.5 mm:
3a Bracts rhombic in outline:
4a Bracts dark green when fresh, dark brown in dried specimens, coriaceous; membranous wings absent . . .
P. hurchellii (Figure 3D)
4b Bracts blue-green (glaucous) In fresh and dried specimens, softly coriaceous; membranous wings present
P. pendida (Figure 3E)
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
219
3b Bracts variously shaped, but not rhombic in outline:
5a Membranous wings present:
6a Wings present as membranous rims along lamina margins:
7a Lamina convex, ovate to obovate, thinly coriaceous, obscurely ribbed P. montana (Figure 3F)
7b Lamina helmet-shaped, widely obovate, thinly chartaceous, smooth P. sp. nov. 2 (Figure 3G)
6b Wings variously shaped, but not as membranous rims along lamina margins:
8a Wings widely ovate, evenly concave, main vein forming small, obtuse apex P. paleacea (Figure 3H)
8b Wings oblate or obovate, often bullate:
9a Main vein extended into leaf-like point P. galpinii (Figure 31)
9b Main vein shortly extended into subacute apex P. sp. nov. 1 (Figure 3J)
5b Membranous wings absent:
10a Bracts oblong in outline, apex obtuse p. ericoides (Figure 3K)
10b Bracts widely ovate or obovate to widely obovate in outline, apex various:
1 la Bracts widely ovate with distinct, short acute point, glaucous, coriaceous; lamina with 2 or 3 shallow
folds p. rigida (Figure 3L)
1 lb Bracts obovate to widely obovate, point obtuse to acute, thickly coriaceous; lamina ribbed and reticu-
lately veined P. glome rata subsp. glomerata (Figure 4A), P. glomerata subsp. nov. 1 (Figure 4B)
2b Bracts longer than 4.5 mm:
12a Bracts lanceolate and glaucous P. drakenshergensi.s (Figure 4C)
12b Bracts variously shaped and coloured, but not lanceolate and glaucous:
13a Main vein shortly extended into an acute apex; lamina rhombic to obtrullate, distinctly angled. 4- or 5-
ribbed p, vulgaris (Figure 4L)
13b Main vein extending beyond lamina into a leaf-like point:
14a Leaf-like point obtuse at apex; lamina closely 2-ribbed at margins P. ohtusifolia (Figure 4D)
14b Leaf-like point not obtuse; lamina extending into a membranous margin:
15a Adaxial (inner) surface of bracts basally to centrally setose or tomentose over entire length of midrib;
wings glabrous:
16a Midrib and leaf-like point stout and strongly developed, apex acute P. paludosa (Figure 4E)
16b Midrib shortly extended or forming a straight or filiform, leaf-like point:
17a Midrib shortly extended, wings ovate-acuminate, gradually narrowing to a point
P.filifonnis subsp. nov. (Figure 4F)
17b Midrib extended, forming a straight or filiform, leaf-like point:
18a Midrib extended into a filiform, slightly falcate point; wings widely obovate, narrowing abruptly
into a leaf-like point P.filifonnis subsp. filiformis (Figure 4G)
18b Midrib extended into a straight point or slightly incurved point; wings ovate with margins hairy
in upper half, or obtrullate, narrowing abruptly into a leaf-like point . , . . F. sp. nov. 4 (Figure 4H, I)
15b Adaxial (inner) surface of bracts completely villous;
19a Midrib extended, leaf-like point falcate; wings ± 4-ribbed P. falcifolia (Figure 4J)
19b Midrib shortly extended into a short point, apex acute; wings ± 5-ribbed P. rubra (Figure 4K)
Generic description of floral morphology
Flowers actinomorphic, bisexual, hypogynous. Floral
envelope membranous during pollination and yellowish
in P. rigida, P. paleacea, P. sp. nov. 1 and P. sp. nov. 2,
slightly succulent and greenish in P. ericoides, mostly
yellow-pink in all other species, dehydrated after shed-
ding of pollen, becoming papyraceous or coriaceous,
yellow-pink tones turning red, (4.0-)5.3-7.3{-8.4) mm
long. Pedicel very short or absent. Receptacle very short.
Hypanthium a membranous to coriaceous cylindric tube;
indumentum variable in density, trichomes nonglandular,
uniseriate, often spiralled, whitish, density of indumen-
tum at ovary ranging from glabrous to tomentose or
strigose; neck (narrowed tube between apex of ovary and
sepals) (0.3-)0.6-2.6(-3.0) mm long, density of indu-
mentum ranging from glabrous to tomentose on outside,
inside often hairy, abscission tissue not macroscopically
discernible, articulation plane absent, after fruiting frag-
mentation of neck base caused by dehydration and torsi-
fication of tissue, shedding sepals and androecium
(Figure 2D, E; Table 8) in most species. Sepals petaloid
(Figures IE; 2A, D); lobes 4, imbricate in bud (Figure
8C, D), flexed in flower, often setose with up to 5 long
trichomes on outer surface and glabrous to tomentose on
inner surface; outer lobes cymbiform or concave; inner
lobes oblong, elliptic or obovate. Corolla absent.
Petaloid scales absent. Androecium dimorphic diploste-
monous, inserted at rim of hypanthium, filaments of
antipetalous whorl (0.4-)0.7-1.2(-1.5) mm long, anti-
sepalous whorl ( 1.2-)1.4-2.2(-2.4) mm long; anthers
(0.5-)0.7-0.9(-l.l) X (0.2-)0.3-0.4(-0.7) mm, subbasi-
fixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular (Figure 9A), extrorse.
Disc absent. Ovary superior, ( 1 .6-)2.0-2.5(-2.7) x
(0.5-)0.6-1.4(-1.7) mm. bicarpellate during embryonic
stage (Bunniger 1972), pseudomonomerous (Heinig
195 1 ) at maturity, placentation parietal, uniloculate, with
1 pendulous ovule laterally attached near top of ovary;
style separating laterally from top of ovary, maintaining
lateral position in hypanthium neck, reaching beyond
hypanthium rim; stigma ± globose, mop-like or penicil-
late (wind-pollination). Fruit enveloped by persistent,
loosely arranged hypanthium fragmented at neck base or,
in some species, fragmenting over widest circumference
of fruit, shedding fragmented hypanthium, sepals and
androecium (Figures ID; 2E), in P. ericoides (Figure IF)
and P. rigida a fleshy 1-seeded berry, 5.3 x 4.0 mm, in
all other species (Figure 2F; Tables 6, 7) an achene, peri-
carp membranous and dry, 2.5 x 1 .2 mm. Seed: tegmen
black and shiny, often with white spots, broadly fusiform
with outgrowths at both micropylar and funicular ends
(Figures IG; 2G), 2.2(-2.9) x 1.2(-1.6) mm.
Generic description of floral anatomy (as seen in
transverse section)
Receptacle base: vascular tissue arranged in a central
stele from which 8 traces are derived in a single whorl
(Figure 5A). Receptacle at apical position: carpellary
bundles arranged in continuous central cylinder; 8 vas-
220
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 3. — Camera lucida drawings of abaxial, lateral and adaxial views of bracts of Passerina taxa, arranged according to sequence in key. A,
P. comosa. Andreae 1288: B-C, P. sp. nov. 3, Esterhuysen 10734, 28006; D, P. burchellii. Bolus 687; E, P. pendula, Bredenkamp 908; F,
P. montana. Bredenkamp 893; G, P. sp. nov. 2, Esterhuysen 26859; H, P. paleacea, Bredenkamp 960; I, P. galpinii, Bredenkamp 946; J,
P. sp. nov. 1, Oliver 9281; K, P. ericoides. Bredenkamp 962; L, P. rigida, Bredenkamp 1013. A-L, x 20. Scale bar: 5 mm.
cular bundles, fused sepal and stamen traces occupying
peripheral position (Figure 5B); cells at perifery of cor-
tex arranged in rows (abscission tissue), differentiation
of inner epidermis of hypanthium and outer epidermis of
ovary wall, separating hypanthium from ovary wall
(Figure 5C, D). Hypanthium irregularly lobed or scal-
loped; outer and inner epidermis variously hairy; cuticle
sometimes strongly developed; 8 vascular bundles
stretching over entire length (Figure 5E, F). Calyx with
4 imbricate lobes developing at hypanthium rim, each
containing 3 vascular bundles; epidermal and hypoder-
mal layers containing large amounts of pigment; spongy
parenchyma aerenchymatic (Figure 8C, D; Table 6).
Androecium; each of the 4 fused commisural sepal and
antipetalous stamen bundles (cs-pst) split into 2 sepal
lateral bundles (si) and I antipetalous stamen bundle
(pst), resulting in the first whorl of 4 antipetalous sta-
mens (situated slightly lower in the hypanthium) and
each sepal containing 3 vascular bundles (Figure 8A,
B); each of the 4 fused sepal midrib and antisepalous
stamen bundles (s-sst) split into a sepal midrib bundle (s)
and an antisepalous stamen bundle (sst), forming the
second whorl of 4 antisepalous stamens (Figure 8B, C);
anthers extrorse, with wall of locule comprising epider-
mis and endothecium only, periclinal walls of epidermis
thin and folded inwards, cell wall thickenings of
endothecium ± stellate, with rib-like extensions directed
towards epidermis (Figure 9B), partitions between
loculi withered and ruptured (Figure 9C), accompanied
by final rupturing of outer walls of thecae (Figure 9D).
Ovary ha.se: wall independent of hypanthium or loosely
adhering to hypanthium at distal side away from placen-
ta (Figure 5E, E; Table 6); outer and inner epidermal
walls strongly developed, containing ample amounts of
tanniniferous substances (Eigure 5E) or less sturdy
(Figure 5G); mesophyll of densely arranged parenchy-
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
221
FIGURE 4. — Camera lucida drawings of abaxial, lateral and adaxial views of bracts of Passerina taxa, arranged according to sequence in key.
A. P. glomerata subsp. glomerata. Bredenkamp 973; B, P. glomerata subsp. nov., Esterhuysen 28587; C, P. drakensbergensis. Bredenkamp
1012; D, P. obtusifolia, Bredenkamp 919; E, P. paludosa. Jangle 156; F, P . fdifonnis subsp, nov., Schlechter 5125; G, P.fdifonnis subsp.
filiformis, Bredenkamp 1039; H, P. sp. nov. 4 from Knysna, Gillen 4537; I, P. sp. nov. 4, Bredenkamp 1327; J, P.falcifolia. Bredenkamp
917; K, P. rubra. Bredenkamp 914; L, P. vulgaris, Bredenkamp 944. A-L, x 20. Scale bar: 5 mm.
TABLE 3. — Comparison of inflorescences and bracts in Passerimi. Sequence of taxa according to key based on bract characters (see text)
222
Bothalia3l,2 (2001)
W) £
c ^
S: ^ r
— <u c
Zi > ^
o c ^
C ■£ o
s e
2
o O rt Q
X) W X) «
6 S
<u
E £
.£ .£ X
X T3 X 73 ’
E C
‘t;
£ >
E § pi
P 1 1
§1 lI'S
u u ^ o JJ o
^ ^ Q C
o 'o E :£ -S -c
-£ -£ — H :=
^ o
c o
:£ £
E 3 o
^X'
^ cd o
■> X ^
^ 3 fin
Q. Q.
X X "O ^ £
E E -ii 3
o o “ 5 :
-E-E S ^ E
o w ■
— TJ J3
-§ g-'i
E o
= E
is.Su o
^ o 73 ^
oj .E
^ a E S S ^ C
~ ^ E T3 c -a c o ^ czi ^
> >iE'5E'S^
X X X X
jj , ^ s ;S
So “ '^'f
_Q ■ - ^3 r'l
o E "O '-' £ +1
^ "O c ^ C/3
3 C •— 3 -3
O c5 O TD o
<u _ > QJ OJ 5j
O T3 ^ O X o
cd ^ 3 Xi 3
‘u -g o -C -c -C
O :£ O V o
o u -3 or) cj
(U
.2 e
3 E 3-
■5 ■= ’S ■= 'S -c
C CL
^.3 3
O CL O ^ (
X X XX
CL , .3 TZ
>JJ ID Jz
a tS o
>500
H o' 2 0' 2 S
Z-ri. c
3 3 { 1 O “ flj
-g « -5 ii g = ^'5 E ^
o J
w fc ■
•S g ;
o ,
Cu o
.£ 5-S ^ '
>'.’3 X
S-sl1| Si:s|
, c CL o wj :> 3 ■
n 't? P
o-gii & .S
o C £
^ o o
s-S-2
« £ o £ E
2 £
o 2
z S
<d £
fc- ^7 'JLl
JD ^ c
*3 ^
2 5
J o ^ CJ
o -E S c
^ 5 o ? ^ S To^ ^ ■> '>
X X X X
X X
3 3 as
X
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
223
TABLE 6. — Distinction between P. ericoides and P. vulgaris based on floral anatomy, seen in t/s (Figures 5; 7; 10)
ma cells (Figure 5E, G) or aerenchymatic (Figure 5F,
H); vascular bundles arranged in a single ring-like whorl
(Figure 5B), median and dorsal carpellary bundles sep-
arating from stele (Figure 5C, D), vascular bundles dif-
ferentiating into dorsal carpellary bundle as well as
median and commissural carpellary bundles (Figure 5E,
G), or dorsal carpellary bundle absent or poorly defined
(Figure 5F, H); funiculus ventral (Figures 5; 6); ovule
bitegmic, outer integument (oi) consisting of outer epi-
dermis (oeoi), mesophyll and inner epidermis (ieoi),
inner integument consisting of palisade-like outer epi-
dermis (oeii), mesophyll and tanniniferous inner epider-
mis (ieii) (Figures 5G, H; 6A, B), crassinucellate;
embryo sac with 1 cell of functional macrospore (Figure
5G, H), Ovary at median position: ovule wall, integu-
ments and nucellus remaining the same; embryo sac
with 2 cells of functional macrospore (Figure 6A. B),
Ovary' at apical position: placental vascular bundles and
funiculus strongly developed; ovule anatropous, posi-
tion ventrally epitropous; obturator of elongate cells
extending from base of style to micropyle (Figures 6C,
D; 7A, B); outer integument horseshoe-shaped, opening
close to funiculus facing placenta (Figures 6C; 7A, B);
micropyle formed by inner integument, initially facing
upwards (Figures 6C, D; 7A), but close to base of style,
incurved towards placenta (Figure 7B), Style four-lobed
or elliptic, stylar channel well developed (Figure 7C, D),
lined by conducting tissue; vascular bundles 4, 1 per
lobe (Figure 1C) or inconspicuously arranged in a row
along the long axis of elliptic style (Figure 7D; Table 6),
Stigma reaching beyond hypanthium rim, penicillate,
ramified into numerous simple papillae, dispersed
between filament bases (Figure 8A-C), Seed exotegmic,
outer integument undergoing atrophy; outer epidermis
of inner integument (oeii) lengthening and becoming
palisade-like, mesophyll consisting of 2 or 3 layers of
parenchyma, inner epidermis of inner integument (ieii)
tanniniferous (Figure lOA, B); tegmen black, lignified,
still portraying palisade origin (Figure IOC, D); outer
layer of nucellus ornate with cellulose thickenings,
nucellus 3-5 cell layers thick; endosperm formation
nuclear (Davis 1966), but later becoming cellular
throughout (Figure lOD), absorbed by cotyledons con-
taining no starch but copious amounts of oil.
Floral morphology at species level
Floral morphological characters and taxonomically
important fruit characters are summarized in Table 7, and
specialized hypanthium and sepal characters in Table 8,
All these are associated with specific leaf anatomical
characters (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001).
DISCUSSION
Inflorescences
Weberling (1989) regards polytelic synflorescences as
dominant within the Thymelaeaceae. He found monotelic
synflorescences in the Gonystyloideae, a relatively primi-
tive group, as well as certain genera of the Thymelaeoideae
and Aquilarioideae. In the Gnidieae, it was found in
Laclinaea L. (= Cryptadenia Meisn.) (Beyers & Van der
Walt 1995; Beyers 1997), a genus endemic to the Cape
Floristic Region (Beyers 1992). Weberling (1989) never-
theless concluded that it appears impossible to draw any
taxonomic conclusions from the existence of monotelic
synflorescences within these taxa. Passerina is character-
ized by polytelic synflorescences. Most species have multi-
flowered main and co-florescences, and a reduction of
florescences to single and subcapitulate spikes is clearly
shown (Table 5).
Bracts
In their descriptions of the Thymelaeaceae, Domke
(1934) reports the presence or absence of bracts and bracte-
oles, sometimes involucral, and Peterson (1978) mentions
that deciduous or persistent bracts are often present. In
Passerina, single flowers are always enveloped by persis-
tent bracts. In the present study, this constant taxonomic
character has been employed in a key for application in
herbarium and field work (Figures 3, 4; Table 5).
Floral morphology and anatomy at generic level
Receptacle
Historically the interpretation of the receptacle in the
Thymelaeaceae has been controversial. Tables 1 and 2
Fruit Floral envelope (hypanthium and sepals) | Ovary | Filaments Anthers
224
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
-S -5 p
bij "2 c
g ^ ^
-J X -
oodooooodoooooooooo
X X X X X
X X X X
inONOO^or^'OcooN^inoo
dddddddd— ^dd
xxxxxxxx
r-•o^o^oooooooo^
dddddd— ^d
=3 P
^ E
9" =
C'J ro ri
r4 ^
^ £
- E
•ri- ri (N
o o o o o
-£ d c
bO *2 c
g s ^
J X -
o^^^o~dd— ‘
xxxxxxxxx
r--'— c4'^coO'^io»n
^ r4 oi 04 — cN H r i oi
'sO O ON
X X X X
04 04 04 04
lO) NO r- r-
d d d d
X X X X X
« •£ E
00 g
F u c
ro O O
X X X X X
xxxxxxxxxxx
XXX
Q 03
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
•2? c a. «
bo ^ ^ ^ -Cl
* From Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (2001 ).
X, character present.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
225
FIGURE 5. — LM photographs of P. ericoides. Bredenkamp 956, with fleshy fruit, and P. vulgaris, Bredenkamp 951, with dry fruit, showing structure of
receptacle and base of ovary. A-D. t/s at different levels of receptacle. A-C. P. vulgaris: A, departure of eight traces from central stele; B, carpel-
lary bundles arranged in ring, fused stamen and sepal traces in peripheral position; C, differentiation of cortex tissue into inner epidennis of hypan-
thium and outer epidermis of ovary wall, separation of dorsal carpellary bundle. D, comparison to similar stage in P. ericoides. E-H, P's at base
of ovary showing vasculation of ovary wall, funiculus and chalaza of pendulous ovule: E. P. ericoides. ovary wall independent of hypanthium,
carpellary bundles in a single whorl; F. P. vulgaris, young bud, ovary wall loosely adhering to hypanthium distally; G. P. ericoides, one cell of
functional macrospore; H, comparison to similar stage in P. vulgaris, reduction of dorsal carpellary bundle, c, carpellary bundle; cc. commissur-
al carpellary bundles; cs-pst, fused commissural sepal and antipetalous stamen bundles; d, area of tissue differentiation; dc, dorsal carpellary bun-
dle; f, funiculus; fm, functional macrospore; h, hypanthium; ieh. inner epidermis of hypanthium; ieow, inner epidermis of ovary wall; ii, inner
integument; me, median carpellary bundle; n, nucellus; o. ovule; oeow, outer epidermis of ovary wall; oi. outer integument; ow, ovary wall; p,
placenta; s-sst. fused sepal midrib and antisepalous stamen bundle; t. trichome; vh. vascular bundle of hypanthium. Scale bars: A-H. 100 pm.
226
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 6. — LM photographs of P. ericoides, Bredeiikamp 956. with fleshy fruit, and P. vulgaris, Bredenkamp 951, with dry fruit, showing
structure of ovary and ovule. A, B, t/s in median position of ovary: A, P. ericoides, embryo sac and two cells of functional macrospore;
B, higher magnification of similar stage in P. vulgaris. C, D, t/s at top of ovary: C, P. ericoides. placenta, obturator and micropyle
originating from inner integument; D, comparison of similar stage in P. vulgaris. Abbreviations as in Figure 5. es, embryo sac; ieii,
inner epidermis of inner integument; ieoi, inner epidermis of outer integument; m, mesophyll; mi, micropyle; ob, obturator; oeii, outer
epidermis of inner integument; oeoi, outer epidermis of outer integument. Scale bars: B, 10 pm; A, C, D, 100 pm.
show that Meisner (1857) regards the floral envelope as
perigynous and hypocrateriform, implying a cup-shaped
receptacle or hypanthium. Gilg (1891, 1894) describes
the lloral envelope as a cylindric receptacle which is
articulate in the upper half, and Endlicher ( 1837, 1847),
Leandri (1930) and Dahlgren & Thorne (1984) regard
the floral arrangement as perigynous. The present study
indicates that the receptacle (in t/s) is very short (Figure
5A, B) and definitely not cup-shaped. This is evident
from the arrangement of peripheral cortex cells in rows,
followed by differentiation into the inner epidermis of
the hypanthium and the outer epidermis of the ovary wall
(Figure 5D), finally by the .separation of the hypanthium
(including the vascular bundles differentiated from the
stele) from the ovary wall and the pre.sence of trichomes
in the space subsequently formed (Figure 5D-F).
Hypanthium and androecial position
Owing to reduction of the receptacle, the hypanthium
in Passerina is here interpreted as being formed by the
fused calyx and androecium only. The vascular tissue of
the hypanthium constitutes the fused sepal and stamen
traces (Heinig 1951), separating from the central stele in
a single whorl and forming a peripheral ring of eight vas-
cular bundles (Figure 5A, B), which persist throughout
the length of the hypanthium. A similar pattern of fusion
and distribution of vascular tissue has been reported by
Heinig (1951) and for the genus Lacimaea (= Cryptade-
nia) by Beyers ( 1992) & Beyers & Van der Walt ( 1995).
In Passerina the central stele differentiates into carpellary
bundles after the separation of the fused sepal and stamen
traces (Figure 5C-F). It can therefore be concluded that
Bothalia3I.2(2001)
227
FIGURE 7. — LM photographs of P. ehcoides. Bredenkamp 956, with fleshy fruit, and P. vulgaris. Bredenkamp 951, with dry fruit, showing
structure of micropyle and style. A. P. ericoides, obturator, pollen tube penetrating micropyle, opening of outer integument towards
micropyle. B, similar stage in P. vulgaris, style departing laterally. C. D, t/s of style. C. four-lobed style in P. ericoides. D, elliptic style
in P. vulgaris. Abbreviations as in Figure 5. ct. conducting tissue; mi. micropyle; ob. obturator; pt, pollen tube; st, style. Scale bars: C.
D, 10 pm; A. B. 100 pm.
the segments of the floral envelope and the androecium
arise below the gynoecium, the floral arrangement being
hypogynous and the ovary superior (Weberling 1989).
Identity of floral envelope
From Wikstrom (1818) to Takhtajan (1997) (Tables
1; 2) the floral envelope in Thymelaeaceae and, in many
cases Passerina, was variously interpreted as an in-
fundibular corolla, hypocrateriform hypanthium, infun-
dibular perigone, perianth, cylindric receptacle, floral
tube formed by coalescence of four external whorls,
perianth tube, or a hypanthium. Heinig (1951) supports
the interpretation of Leandri (1930) and Domke (1934)
of the floral tube as appendicular in origin, composed
of the fused bases of the sepals and adherent stamen
filaments, also pointing out that the sepal is with few
exceptions a three-trace organ. Bunniger (1972) is of the
opinion that the hypanthiums in families of the Myrtales
and Thymelaeales have a similar origin. Our results
show eight vascular bundles running along the length of
the hypanthium and separating into sepal and stamen
bundles, each sepal lobe eventually with three vascular
bundles (Figure 8 A, B). We regard the floral envelope as
a hypanthium (fused calyx and androecium), differen-
tiating into four petaloid sepals and a diplostemonous
androecium, arising from the hypanthium rim at the
separation of the sepals. A very short receptacle (Heinig
1951), which does not contribute to the hypanthium,
indicates a reduction in tissue and a possible advanced
state. This is indeed the case in Passerina.
A study of petaloid scales in Thymelaeaceae has
added further evidence to the interpretation of the floral
envelope. These scales have been regarded by various
authors as perigynous scales or glands, perigynous nec-
taries, petals or staminodes, petaloid scales and petaloid
appendages (Tables 1; 2). Heinig (1951) is convinced
that the morphology and vascularization of the petaloid
scales resemble that of stipules, an opinion shared by
Rao & Dahlgren ( 1969) on the floral anatomy and rela-
tionships of the Oliniaceae. In their floral description of
Olinia, Dahlgren & Van Wyk (1988) consider the
petaloid scales as true petals. Heinig (1951) concludes
that the Thymelaeaceae is apetalous. In Passerina there
are no petaloid scales or corolla (Tables 1; 2). Our
results have shown the separation of antipetalous as well
as antisepalous stamens, but petaloid scales or even ves-
tiges of them were not observed. We therefore regard
Passerina as truly apetalous. The complete reduction of
the corolla or the absence of petaloid scales can be
regarded as an advanced state in the Thymelaeaceae; it
could also be interpreted as part of the anemophilous
syndrome displayed by the genus. Based on both the
pattern of the vascular tissue and the absence of petaloid
scales, we consider the floral envelope in Passerina as a
hypanthium consisting of the fused calyx and androecium,
differentiating into four sepals and the diplostemonous
stamens.
TABLE 8. — Specialized characters of the floral envelope in Passerina, correlated with leaf anatomy
228
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
o 5
"2 b
S,2
2 §
u. S-
O
C ^
1)
> CiiJ > o ^
« c a -s XI
^ ^ ^ -B- S
O -D O = >v
(J O O <U <J
JU JD
£ E
o
E £
X) X
E E
c E
o -5.
c ?
Q, "5^
— — o
o —
X X
r<3 On
2 >>
2- Q C -r>r
2 2
^ i
3 3 o
Of) (jj
§22
^ c c
X <u <u
^ E E
2“ o o
>> 2
c -o
Cl-
2 c p
■a p -g
E 2 -bo
£ ^
2 3 3
X c p p
c I X X
^ 2 ’bh 'bij
>.2 3
X C p
§ £ -s
2 P TTn
£ E
3 3
o c
X X
b/j "bij
E E
I O eI
TTr, 2 P PTf*
>.2 3 2
^ C P c
§ I -s I
D- -3 X
(U -p
£ g
>>2^2
c j_ c :
■p <u <u <u
M & £
y o 9- o
— D
XX XX X X X X X
cQcQoaDg mcQ oaQca
X X
X, character present; * average in mm.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
229
FIGURE 8. — LM photographs of P. ericoides. Bredenkamp 956. with fleshy fruit, and P. vulgaris. Bredenkauip 951, with dry fruit, showing
structure of androecium. A-D. serial t/s of sepals and two anther whorls. A-C, P. ericoides: A. each of fused commissural sepal and
antipetalous stamen bundles splitting into two sepal laterals and one antlpetalous stamen bundle; B, fused sepal midrib and antisepa-
lous stamen bundle, splitting into sepal midrib and antisepalous stamen bundle; C. final stage in separation of antisepalous stamen bun-
dles. D. P. vulgaris, t/s through both anther whorls. Abbreviations as in Figure 5. pst. antipetalous stamen bundle; s, sepal midrib bun-
dle; si. sepal lateral bundle; sm. stigma; sp, sepal; sst. antisepalous stamen bundle. Scale bars; A-D, 100 pm.
Fragmentation of hypanthinm
The fruit in Passerina is enveloped by a persistent,
loosely attached hypanthium. Bentham & Hooker (1880),
Gilg (1891, 1894), Domke (1934) and Melchior (1964)
mention that the hypanthium is articulated above the ovary.
We found no definite articulation point in the hypanthium
neck (narrowed part of hypanthium between apex of ovary
and sepals) in Passerina, possibly because of the absence
of receptacle tissue and the appendicular namre of the
hypanthium. The base of the neck fragmented as a result of
desiccation and torsification of cells (Figure 2E). In some
species, fragmentation of the hypanthium takes place over
the widest circumference of the fruit, shedding the frag-
mented distal part of the hypanthium, sepals and androeci-
um (Figure ID). A strong association was found between
flowers with a short hypanthium neck and fragmentation of
the hypanthium over the widest part of the fruit, and also
between flowers with a long hypanthium neck and frag-
mentation at the base of the neck (Table 8).
A plane of circumscission, dividing the floral tube into
a basal and upper portion, is clearly illustrated in Gnidia
and Struthiola (Peterson 1978) and Lachnaea (Beyers
1992; Beyers & Van der Walt 1995). We hypothesize that
the plane of circumscission possibly indicates a differ-
ence in tissue composition between the basal and upper
portions of the hypanthium and that this articulation can
be of morphological importance in the Thymelaeaceae.
The basal portion of the floral tube below the plane of cir-
cumscission possibly indicates the inclusion of receptacle
tissue in the hypanthium, whereas the upper portion con-
sists of calyx and androecium tissue only (accepting the
apetalous state). An alternative interpretation, offered by
one of the referees of this paper, regards the vasculature
as a prerequisite to decide whether one is dealing with a
hypanthium (appendicular in origin) or a receptacle (axial
in origin). The significance of an articulation indicating a
distinction between parts of the hypanthium of different
derivation, should be further investigated.
Androecium
In his de.scription of Thymelaeaceae, Peterson (1978)
describes the stamens as twice as many or as many as the
sepals (rarely reduced to two or one), in one or two whorls,
the outer whorl antisepalous. In the subfamily Aqui-
larioideae (Heinig 1951), stamens are of approximately
230
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 9. — LM photographs of P. ericoides, Bredenkamp 956 and P. vulgaris, Bredenkamp 951, showing structure of anther loculae in t/s: A,
P. vulgaris, 4-locular anther; B, P. ericoides, cell wall thickenings of endothecium rib-like; C, P. vulgaris, rupturing of partition between
loculi; D, P. ericoides, rupturing of outer walls of thecae, extrorse. e, epidermis; en, endothecium; po, pollen. Scale bars: B, C, 10 pm;
A, D. 100 pm.
equal length and the traces supplying them separate from
the sepal traces, practically in a single whorl. The
Thymelaeoideae is characterized by stamens arising as
two distinct whorls at two distinct levels in the floral tube.
The dimorphic diplostemonous nature of stamens in
Passerimi (Thymelaeoideae), in which the antipetalous
stamens are shorter than the antisepalous ones, has been
confinried by our observations (Figure 8A-C). According
to Heinig (1951) evolution within the androecium has
been from polystemony to diplostemony to dimorphic
diplostemony, indicating the advanced state of the androe-
cium in Passerina. Peterson (1978) describes the anthers
as usually introrse, rarely extrorse. Species of Passerina
have large, exserted, extrorse anthers, clearly an adapta-
tion to the anemophilous syndrome of the genus.
Separation of fused sepal and stamen traces
Heinig ( 1951 ) is of the opinion that a foreshortening
of the floral axis has resulted in a fusion of the calyx and
androecium and that progressive stages of adnation can
be ob.served in the family. In all species the antipetalous
stamen traces are fused to the commisural sepal traces
and the antisepalous stamen traces to the sepal midrib
traces at their point of origin from the stele. In the
Aquilarioideae, in Octolepis dinklagei, they become
separated in the receptacle or, in other cases, low down
in the floral tube. Except for Gnidia splendens (- Lasio-
siphon splendens), in which the separation of the
antipetalous and anti.sepalous stamen traces takes place
in the receptacle, Thymelaeoideae is characterized by
separation higher up in the floral tube, e.g. at the top of
the ovary in Dirca occidentalis and below the origin of
the sepals in Gnidia suhidata (Heinig 1951). In Passe-
rina the separation of the antipetalous stamen traces
takes place at the origin of the sepals (Figure 8 A, B) and
separation of the antisepalous traces slightly higher up
(Figure 8C), indicating what appears to be a phylogeneti-
cally advanced tendency.
Pollen
Pollen grains of most members of Thymelaeaceae are
monads, spheroid and pantoporate, characterized by a
typical croton pattern, comprising rings of more or less
trihedral sexine units mounted on an underlying reticulum
of circular muri (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1996). In
Passerina, the basal reticulum, as in the typical croton
pattern, is no longer discernible as it is replaced by a sec-
ondary reticulum derived from fused sexine. The supra-
tectal subunits are fused completely to form a continuous
reticulum which replaces the underlying reticulum. The
reticulum in Passerina is therefore secondary in origin
and considered phylogenetically advanced. This modifi-
cation of the crotonoid pattern is probably also of func-
tional significance as pollen in Passerina is adapted to
anemophily.
Disc
In Aquilarioideae a hypogynous disc is generally
absent, but is almost always present in Thymelaeoideae
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
231
FIGURE 10. — LM photographs of P. ericoides. Bredenkamp 956. with fleshy fruit, and P. vulgaris, Bredenkamp 951. with dry fruit, showing
structure of young fruit and developing seed in Us. A, B, P. ericoides: A. pericarp fleshy, atrophy of outer integument; B, higher mag-
nification. outer epidermis of inner integument palisade-like, mesophyll, inner epidermis of inner integument tanniniferous. C. D,
P. vulgaris: C. palisade-like exotegmen discemable in tegmen. D. tegmen black and lignified, crassinucellate. endosperm initially
nuclear. Abbreviations as in Figure 5. ens. endosperm; es. embryo sac; ieii. inner epidermis of inner integument; m, mesophyll; oeii,
outer epidermis of inner integument; pc. pericarp; te, tegmen. Scale bars; A-D. 100 pm.
(Heinig 1951; Peterson 1978). Possibly because of a
reduction of tissue, no disc was observed in Passerina, a
state confirmed by Bunniger (1972).
Ovary
The ovary in Passerina was described as unilocular
up to the time of Domke (1934) (Table 1 ). The pseudo-
monomerous state is mentioned by Eckardt (1937),
Melchior (1964), Dahlgren & Thorne (1984) and
Cronquist (1988) (Table 2), while most authors agree
that ovules are solitary and pendulous. According to
Takhtajan (1997) the ovary in Thymelaeoideae consists
of two carpels, it is monolocular and the ovule is solitary.
Heinig (1951) is convinced that within the carpellary
whorl a reduction series may be observed, ranging from
four- or more-carpellate members in the Aquilarioideae
to the two-carpellate members of the Thymelaeoideae in
which one carpel is markedly contracted, thus a
pseudomonomerous ovary. According to Heinig (1951)
the ovules have been reduced to one per locule in the
entire family. In Passerina, at the base of the ovary, the
dorsal and median carpellary bundles initially separate
from the central stele (Figure 5C, D). After differentia-
tion has taken place, the dorsal, median and commissur-
al carpellary bundles (Figure 5E) can be distinguished.
Because of a redistribution of carpellary bundles, the sin-
gle dorsal carpellary bundle is arranged at the opposite
side of the horseshoe-shaped median and commissural
carpellary bundles (Figure 5G). In Dirca palustris.
232
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
Heinig (1951) has illustrated the authenticity of the
pseudomonomerous ovary by the presence of two dorsal
carpellary bundles, one in the fertile carpel and one in the
second, reduced, sterile carpel positioned between two
groups of commissural carpellary bundles. Bunniger
(1972) showed the presence of two carpels in the flower
primordia of P. filiformis. In the present study, which
included the young bud stage of P. vulgaris (Figure 5F),
no indication of a second carpel or a second dorsal
carpellary bundle was found, possibly because of reduc-
tion and fusion processes, which had already taken place
in the formation of the young ovary, consequently we
consider the ovary of Passerina as pseudomonomerous.
Ovule type and position
Domke (1934) describes the ovule in Thymelaeaceae
as pendulous, anatropous, with a ventral funiculus, ex-
ceptionally hemi-anatropous or orthotropous, indicating
a phylogenetic tendency. Our study clearly indicates a
pendulous, anatropous ovule in Passerina (Figure 6C,
D). The funiculus is ventral and has been sectioned from
the base of the ovule (Figures 5E-H; 6A) to the point of
attachment with the placenta (Figure 6C, D). Close to the
embryo sac the micropyle is a trilete opening formed by
the inner integument (Figures 6C, D; 7A), facing
upward. Towards the micropyle, the outer and inner
integuments become horseshoe-shaped (in t/s), resulting
in the micropyle being directed towards the elongated
obturator cells, located at the base of the style (Figure
7B). Based on these results, we agree with Dahlgren
(1975b), who regards the ovule as pendulous and
epitropous.
Obturator
Davis (1966) defines an obturator as any structure asso-
ciated with directing the growing pollen tube towards the
micropyle, but elongated cells extending from the base of
the style to the micropyle are considered exclusive to the
Thymelaeaceae. In Passerina such elongated obturator
cells can be clearly seen at the level of the placenta, at the
departure of the funiculus, touching on the inner integu-
ment (Figures 6C; 7A) and finally these cells extend from
the base of the style entering the micropyle (Figure 7B).
Fruit
Most authors (Tables 1; 2) agree that the fruit in
Thymelaeaceae is indehiscent. In Passerina, Wikstrom
(1818), Meisner (1857) and Endlicher (1837, 1847) con-
sider the fruit as a nut or a nutlet. Domke (1934) concludes
that the fruit of Dais, Gnidia, Lachnaea (= Cryptadenia)
and many taxa of Passerina can be defined as an achene,
and that of P. ericoides as a bemy. Dahlgren (1975b) con-
siders the fruit of Thymelaeaceae as a nut or drupe, Peter-
son (1978) regards it as a berry, a nut, a drupe or a loculi-
cidal capsule and Takhtajan (1997) describes them as nut-
like, baccate or dmpaceous. A relevant family character,
that the outer integument of the ovule disintegrates and the
inner integument becomes palisade-like and hardens to
form a seed coat or tegmen (Figure lOA-D), is illustrated
by the present study. Structurally the dry, membranous fruit
in Passerina conforms to an achene (Spuyt 1994) and the
reduction in pericarp tissue can probably be considered as
a specialized adaptation. A reduction in tissue from a drupe
to a membranous 1 -seeded berry or an achene can be illus-
trated in Thymelaeaceae and therefore the fruit in
Passerina could be considered advanced within the family.
We agree with Domke ( 1934) that P. ericoides (Figures IF;
lOA) and P. rigida are characterized by a fleshy 1 -seeded
berry, while all the other species have an achene (Figure
2F; Table 7). The achene remains enveloped in the rem-
nants of the papyraceous hypanthium, nestled adaxially in
the tomentum of the concave, persistent cymbiform bracts.
Seed
The existing confusion concerning the state of the
tegmen in Passerina is a reflection of the total lack of
information of this aspect in descriptions of the group by
various authors (Tables 1; 2). Meisner (1857) describes a
crustaceous pericarp and Domke (1934) a black, crusta-
ceous testa. The ovule in Passerina is bitegmic (Figures
6; 7; 10). Corner (1976) refers to outer integument (oi)
and inner integument (ii), the product of the outer integu-
ment becoming the testa and that of the inner integu-
ment, the tegmen. In Passerina the outer integument dis-
integrates, whereas the inner integument remains (Figure
lOA), its outer epidermis becoming palisade-like (Figure
lOA, B). Hence, the seeds of Passerina are exotegmic
with a palisade, a state common to the family (Corner
1976). In Passerina the tegmen is black and lignified,
and in t/s, still portraying its origin from the palisade-like
epidermis (Figure IOC, D).
Floral and fruit morphology at species level (Tables 1; 8)
In the present study, specific results in leaf anatomy
indicating the arrangement of taxa in Passerina
(Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001), are associated with flo-
ral morphological structures as well as fruit and seed
types. In Table 7, leaf structural types A and especially
B3 are associated with four species that have smaller,
yellow, membraneous flowers (up to 5.3 mm long). Leaf
structural types B4, B5, B6, C and D are associated with
most species having larger, yellow-pink, papyraceous
flowers (up to 8.4 mm long). The same tendency in the
length of the neck, and the size of the inner sepals is
shown in Table 8.
Fruit
Eleshy fruit in P. ericoides (Eigure ID, F) and P. rigida
is possibly correlated with the moist maritime climate of
the coastal habitat of these species; it is possibly also an
adaptation to bird dispersal. Both species occur in the
Western Cape, and the range of P. rigida extends along
the coast to St Lucia. P. ericoides has red berries and
P. rigida has yellow benies. All other species are char-
acterized by achenes and are adapted to drier habitats,
from mountainous areas along the Great Escarpment to
the arid Karoo. In Passerina, each achene is enveloped
by papyraceous remnants of the fragmented hypanthium
and enclosed within the tomentum of an enlarged bract
(Eigure 2D, E), which often takes on a rounded shape
and turns yellow, red or brownish.
The fruits of Passerina clearly illustrate the phenome-
non of transfer of function from protection to dispersal
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
233
(Stebbins 1974). In P. ericoides and P. rigida, with fleshy
fruit, the pericarp has the double function of protecting
the ovules during early stages of development and disper-
sal. The mature fruit enlarges beyond the bracts and is
protected by the coriaceous pericarp, while the patent
bract does not have a protective function (Figure ID). The
pericarp of the fruit is yellow or red when it is ready for
dispersal, probably by birds or small mammals (Richards
1986), and the dispersal unit is the berry. In all other
species which are characterized by achenes, the protec-
tion of the ovule is apparently transferred from the peri-
carp to the persistent bract. The bract enlarges around the
achene, protecting it in the woolly tomentum of the con-
cave adaxial surface (Figure 2D). The mature fruit is
often still enveloped by the reddish, papyraceous rem-
nants of the hypanthium. Both P. montana and P. glom-
erata are characterized by subcapitulate inflorescences,
with proliferating growth more common in the latter
species. In P. glomerata (growing in the arid Karoo) the
accompanying bract turns yellow and becomes more
patent when the fruit is mature; the achene is shed after
abscission. The yellow colour is associated with senes-
cence of the bracts and these structures are eventually
shed, leaving conspicuous bract scars on the remaining,
often terminal, woolly inflorescence axis. The unit of dis-
persal, in this case, is the achene, assisted by the patent
senescing bract. The achene falls to the ground where it
could either be dispersed by ants or small mammals or
germinate under favourable conditions. In P. montana
(growing along the Great Escarpment), the margin of the
fruiting bract turns red and it becomes more patent,
exposing the achene enveloped in the beak-like, reddish,
papyraceous hypanthium, which fragments at the neck
base. Perhaps birds, attracted by the red colour (Richards
1986), feed on the exposed achenes. Leafless, terminal,
woolly branchlets, with terminal scars are a conspicuous
feature of the plant after fruiting and it therefore also
seems possible that the subterminal capitulum with sever-
al achenes is broken off as a unit. In this case the disper-
sal unit could be the achene or the achene accompanied
by the bract or perhaps even the entire subcapitulum.
There is a need for further observations on seed dispersal
in the field to test some of these suggestions.
Filament length
For a comparison of filament length, it is easier to
measure the antisepalous filaments as they are ± twice
the length of the antipetalous ones. Both P. sp. nov. 1 and
P. sp. nov. 2 have short antisepalous filaments of ± 1.2
mm, corresponding to their small flowers. P. palndosa,
P. fdiformis and P. falcifolia have exserted stamens
because of their long (2. 1-2.4 mm) filaments.
Anthers
Conspicuous differences in anther size have been
noticed among the species; this has also been reported by
Thoday (1924). In relation to flower size, most species
have large exserted anthers between 0.7(-0.9) x
0.3(-0.7) mm, possibly an anemophilous adaptation. P.
ericoides has ± elliptic anthers (Figure 1 ), whereas those
of P. drakensbergensis are narrowly oblong, 0.9 x 0.3
mm. The largest anthers of 1.0 x 0.5 mm are found in P.
obtusifolia and P. falcifolia.
Floral envelope
The hypanthium and sepals in P. ericoides are char-
acterized by their coriaceous (almost fleshy) appearance
and dull green to pinkish colour. The floral envelope in
P. rigida, P. paleacea, P. sp. nov. 1 and P. sp. nov. 2 is
pale yellowish and quite membranous. P. pendida is dis-
tinguished by a pinkish floral envelope, with a membra-
nous texture. In all the other species the floral envelope
is yellow-pink at anthesis, with a papyraceous texture.
After pollination these flowers turn red and the hypan-
thium and sepals become thinly papyraceous and dry.
For practical purposes the total length of the floral
envelope indicates flower size, and its taxonomic impor-
tance is clearly illustrated by the general increase in size
from species 1-20 (Table 7). P. rigida, P. paleacea and
P. sp. nov. 2 are characterized by small flowers, the
length of the floral envelope 4.0^. 6 mm. In most other
species it ranges from 5. 3-7. 3 mm long. P. rubra and P.
falcifolia are characterized by large flowers, the floral
envelope being 8.4 mm long.
Specialized characters (Table 8)
a. Fragmentation of hypanthium after fruiting
During the fruiting phase, the persistent hypanthium
fragments over the broadest part of the ovary, in eight of
the 20 species. Except in P. obtusifolia, the hypanthium
of all these species is characterized by a short neck of
O. 3-1.0 mm. Anatomically their leaves also correlate
with leaf structural type B (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk
2001 ). When fragmentation occurs at the neck base, the
hypanthium usually has a long neck length of mostly
1. 3-3.0 mm, and such species are associated with leaf
structural types A, B, C and D.
b. Indumentum of hypanthium
In certain species of the genus Lachnaea (Beyers 1992;
Beyers & Van der Walt 1995), different trichome types are
found below and above the articulation plane in the hypan-
thium. This state could possibly also be present in other
genera of the Thymelaeaceae. In Passerina the trichome
type remains constant over the length of the hypanthium,
possibly because there is no articulation plane in the
hypanthium. As Passerina is distributed over a wide range
of habitats, the density of the indumentum has been impor-
tant in the distinction of certain species (Table 8). P. eri-
coides is distinguished by the strigose indumentum over
the length of the hypanthium, whereas the indumentum of
the neck is strigose in P. palndosa. A completely glabrous
hypanthium is characteristic of P. paleacea. In 12 of the
species, the hypanthium surrounding the ovary is
glabrous, scantily tomentose or tomentose at the apex,
with the neck scantily tomentose or tomentose. In P. sp.
nov. 1 , P. sp. nov. 2 and P. filiformis subsp. filifonnis the
hypanthium is tomentose over its entire length. In
P. galpinii the whole of the hypanthium is pubescent,
whereas in P. rubra only the neck is pubescent and the rest
of the hypanthium is glabrous.
A strong correlation was found between the indumen-
tum of the lower hypanthium and of the bract. There is a
234
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
tendency for species characterized by a glabrous hypan-
thium base (Table 8) to have a protective bract with a
very hairy adaxial surface (Table 5), whereas species
with a hairy hypanthium base have a less hairy to almost
glabrous adaxial bract surface. When the hypanthium
neck is not covered by a bract, it tends to be hairy in
varying degrees. Only P. paleacea has a completely
glabrous hypanthium. In this species the entire hypanthi-
um is completely covered by the hairy adaxial surface of
the bract because of the very short hypanthium neck.
This tendency shows that the function of protection of
the ovule is partly transferred from the hypanthium to the
hairy bract (Stebbins 1974).
c. Indumentum of sepals
Thoday (1924) uses the character ‘outer sepals beard-
ed behind the apex’ in his key to distinguish between
species. The abaxial surfaces of the outer and inner lobes
of seven species are setose at the apex only and the adax-
ial surfaces range from glabrous to variously hairy (Table
8). In f. comosa abaxial surfaces of both outer and inner
lobes are tomentose and adaxial surfaces are glabrous,
P. drakensbergensis is similar except for the tomentose
adaxial surface of the inner lobes. All sepals are com-
pletely glabrous in P. paleacea. The indumentum of the
sepals varies infraspecifically and should, however, be
used with discretion to distinguish between groups of
species.
d. Size and shape of sepals
The size of the inner sepals is of taxonomic impor-
tance (Table 8). P. sp. nov. 1, P. ericoides, P. rigida, P.
paleacea and P. sp. nov. 2 are characterized by shorter
and broader inner sepals, varying from widely ovate,
obovate, widely obovate to subrotund. All other species
have longer, narrower inner sepals, the shape varying,
with one exception, from narrowly oblong, oblong,
oblong-elliptic, elliptic, to obovate. P. drakensbergensis
is distinguished by lanceolate sepals arranged in the
shape of a cross.
Less important taxonomic characters
Ovary size (Table 7) has been considered less impor-
tant, as it is difficult to measure all ovaries at the same
developmental phase. In Passerina the size of the ovary
increases markedly after anthesis and the enlarged ovary,
enveloped by the persistent hypanthium, can already be
observed in older flowers, rapidly followed by matura-
tion of the fruit.
Taxonomic relationships
Up to 1930, priority was given to the definition of
subordinal or subfamilial taxa in Thymelaeaceae, based
mainly on floral morphology (Table I ). Applying both
morphological and anatomical evidence, Domke (1934)
proposed a satisfactory subfamilial classification system
and envisages a phylogenetic relationship between the
Thymelaeaceae, Malvaceae and Euphorbiaceae. Modern
techniques have enabled taxonomists to find relation-
ships between families and to arrange them into higher
hierarchies, with ranks such as superorders or subclass-
es. Thus Dahlgren (1980) placed the Thymelaeaceae in
the superorder Malviflorae (= Dilleniiflorae), Cronquist
(1981, 1988) placed it in the subclass Rosidae, Thorne
(1992a, 1992b) in the superorder Malvanae and
Takhtajan (1997) in the subclass Dilleniidae (Table 2).
Heinig (1951) discussed the relationships of the
Thymelaeaceae with the Myrtales, Saxifragaceae,
Lythraceae, Gonystylaceae and Malvales on the basis of
floral morphology and concluded that a polyphyletic ori-
gin of the Thymelaeaceae could be sought in both the
Flacourtiaceae and Tiliaceae.
Cronquist (1968, 1981, 1988) considered the
Thymelaeaceae as completely at home in the Myrtales
(Rosidae) on account of the strongly perigynous
polypetalous to apetalous flowers, internal phloem, ves-
tured pits and obturator. However, he admited a possible
relationship with other families, based on the
pseudomonomerous ovary and crotonoid pollen. Dahl-
gren (1975 a, b) placed the superorder Thymelaeanae
between the Dillenianae (Dilleniales, Cistales, Malvales,
Urticales, Euphorbiales) and the Myrtanae. Within the
superorder Malviflorae, Dahlgren (1980) recognized a
close affinity between the Malvales and Euphorbiales,
and indicated a strong relationship with the Urticales and
the Thymelaeales, but a phylogenetic affinity between
the Malviflorae and Myrtiflorae was not supported. The
inclusion of the Thymelaeaceae in the Myrtales was
reviewed by Dahlgren & Thome (1984). They argued
that anatomically, most members of the family possess
Myrtalean characters. On the other hand, embryological,
chemical and palynological evidence strongly indicates
an affinity with the Malviflorae. Thorne (1992a) accept-
ed the superorder Malvanae, but included the Thyme-
laeaceae in the order Euphorbiales. Takhtajan (1969)
considered the Thymelaeales to have a common origin
with the Euphorbiales and Malvales, all arising from a
Elacourtiaceae-type ancestor, and Takhtajan (1997)
placed the Thymelaeales in the superorder Euphor-
bianae, with the Gonystylaceae as the only other family
in the order.
Palynological evidence indicates that the very distinc-
tive pollen in Thymelaeaceae is totally different from
that of any Myrtales and similar to that of most
Euphorbiaceae. Archangelsky (1971) concluded that
both the Euphorbiales and the Thymelaeales belong to
the subclass Dilleniidae and originated from ancestral
lines of the Dilleniales -> Violales Malvales. In a
paper on palynology of Passerina, Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk (1996) supported Dahlgren (1980) in placing the
Thymelaeales in the Malviflorae (= Dilleniiflorae).
In Passerina, the structure of the integuments sur-
rounding the ovule provides taxonomically useful
embryological evidence. We have shown the disintigra-
tion of the outer integument and the differentiation of the
inner integument into a palisade-like outer epidermis, a
mesophyl layer and an inner epidermis (Figure lOA, B).
It is also clear that the mechanical part of the seed coat is
derived from the palisade-like outer epidermis, hence it
is an exotegmen (Figure IOC, D). Corner (1976) distin-
guished the Euphorbiales-Malvales-Thymelaeales-
Tiliales (Malvalean complex) on the basis of the exo-
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
235
tegmic palisade. He dismissed the derivation of the
Malvalean complex from the Dilleniales (endotestal
seeds) or Violales and looked towards the Myristicaceae
(Magnoliales-Ranales) for the origin of the Malvalean
seed.
Recent evidence from molecular phylogeny (Table 3)
should be interpreted in context with the evidence from
other botanical fields. The primary focus of The
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG 1998) is on orders,
with a secondary focus on families of flowering plants.
Above the ordinal level, ranks are defined as subgroups,
clades or supraordinal subgroups. Magallon et al. (1999)
attempted to compare these groups to the existing systems
mentioned in the preceding paragraphs. Both APG ( 1998)
and Magallon et al. (1999) recognized the Eudicots, a
group characterized by tricolpate pollen, as well as the
supraordinal group Core Eudicots, supported by pen-
tamerous and isomerous flowers. Thymelaeaceae is desig-
nated to the Rosid clade by most authors. APG (1998)
placed the Thymelaeaceae in the subgroup Eurosids II and
order Malvales, whereas all the other authors placed it in
the Expanded Malvales. The Malvalean relationship of the
Thymelaeaceae seems to be strongly supported by molec-
ular phylogeny, as well as floral morphology, anatomy,
embryology and palynology.
The Euphorbiales-Malvales-Thymelaeales relationship
indicated by embryology and palynology is, however,
not supported by molecular data. APG (1998) placed the
Euphorbiaceae in the order Malpighiales in the subgroup
Eurosids I and Magallon et al. (1999) placed it in the
Core Rosid Clade. Cronquist (1968, 1981, 1988) was
convinced that if the Thymelaeaceae is not placed in the
Myrtales, it would stand next to it. Conti et al. (1996),
APG (1998), and Alverson et al. (1999) all regarded the
Myrtales as a sister group of the Malvales or the Expand-
ed Malvales to which the Thymelaeaceae is designated.
Speculations on phylogeny
Within Thymelaeaceae, both Domke (1934) and
Heinig (1951) agreed that the subfamily Thymelaeoideae
is phylogenetically more advanced than the Aquilari-
oideae. On the basis of the advanced pollen, Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk ( 1996) raised the subtribe Passerininae to the
tribe Passerineae, a decision supported by the present
study. Although many of the following advanced charac-
ter states are present in other genera of the Thyme-
laeoideae, these advanced character states are all found
together in Passerina: receptacle reduced to a ± lenticu-
lar structure; departure of the fused sepal and stamen
bundles before carpellary bundles; hypogynous floral
arrangement; petal-like floral envelope comprising a
hypanthium (fused calyx and androecium), differentiat-
ing into four sepals and a diplostemonous androecium;
separation of stamen bundles high up in hypanthium, at
formation of sepals; exserted, extrorse anthers; anemo-
philous habit; secondary reticulum of pollen; complete
absence of petals or petaloid scales; asymmetric devel-
opment of the style; superior, pseudomonomerous, uni-
locular ovary; asymmetric attachment of ovule at top of
ovary; ventrally epitropous ovule; distinctive obturator;
bitegmic ovule with exotegmic palisade; fruit a 1 -seeded
berry or an achene; seed with lignified, black exotegmen.
Considering all the characters mentioned, Passerina is
considered highly advanced in relation to other genera in
Thymelaeoideae.
Systematic value
Family level
The exotegmic palisade and the distinctive obturator
are regarded as family characters. They form the basis of
Comer’s (1976) Euphorbiales-Malvales-Thymelaeales-
Tiliales complex.
Subfamily level
The Thymelaeoideae is distinguished on the basis of
the calyx tube (hypanthium in the present study),
diplostemous androecium and pseudomonomerous ovary
(Domke 1934; Heinig 1951).
Tribal level
On the basis of the secondary reticulum, unique to the
pollen of Passerina, Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (1996)
raised the subtribe Passerininae to the tribe Passerineae.
Genus level
The present study indicates the exserted, extrorse
anthers and the anemophilous habit as unique to Passe-
rina.
Species level
Characters useful at species level are summarized in
Tables 7 and 8.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence on floral morphology not only con-
firmed the identity of 20 species and four subspecies, but
also proved significant in the taxonomy of the genus. The
status of the following taxa is confirmed by the present
floral morphological study: P. burcliellii Thoday,
P. comosa C.H.Wright, P. drakensbergensis Hilliard &
B.L.Burtt, P. ericoides L., P. falcifolia C.H.Wright, P.fd-
iformis L. subsp. fdiformis, P. fdiformis L. subsp. nov.,
P. galpinii C.H.Wright, P. glomerata Thunb. subsp.
glomerata, P. glomerata Thunb. subsp. nov., P. montana
Thoday, P. obtusifolia Thoday, P. paleacea Wikstr.,
P. paludosa Thoday, P. pendula Eckl. & Zeyh., P. rigida
Wikstr., P. rubra C.H.Wright, P. vulgaris, P. sp. nov. 1,
P. sp. nov. 2, P. sp. nov. 3 and P. sp. nov. 4.
For almost three centuries evidence from floral mor-
phology has been basic to plant taxonomy and applied at
all hierachical levels. Our research on the flowers in
Passerina has produced new morphological and anatomi-
cal evidence, especially as Heinig’s classical study of floral
morphology in Thymelaeaceae (1951) did not include
Passerina. The present study has succeeded in resolving
the floral morphology in Passerina, as many mistakes
have been perpetuated by previous authors. We conclude
that the flower in Passerina is a phylogenetically
advanced structure and consider the genus advanced
236
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
within the Thymelaeoideae. Possible taxonomic relation-
ships of the Thymelaeaceae with the Malvales are strong-
ly supported by the presentation of floral morphological,
anatomical, embryological and palynological information
to which this study has also contributed. Finally, all the
above-mentioned evidence serves to form a firm taxo-
nomic basis for future comparative studies, especially in
the expanding molecular field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr E. Steyn for assistance
with the LM, Ms G. Condy for the line drawings and Ms
A. Romanowski for the developing and printing of the
photographs.
REFERENCES
ALVERSON, W.S., KAROL, K.G., BAUM, D.A., CHASE. M.W.,
SWENSEN, S.M., MCCOURT. R. & SYTSMA, K.J. 1998.
Circum.scription of the Malvales and relationships to other
Rosidae; evidence from rbcL sequence data. American Journal
of Botany 85: 876-887.
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG). 1998. An ordinal
classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
ARCHANGELSKY, D.B. 1971. Palynotaxonomy of the Thyme-
laeaceae sJ. In L.A. Kuprianova & M.S. Jakovlev, Pollen mor-
phology: 104-234. (In Russian.) Academy of Science. USSR,
Komarov Botanical Institute, Leningrad.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1880. Genera plantarum Vol. 3.
Cramer, Weinheim.
BEYERS, J.B.P. 1992. The generic delimitation of Lachnaea and
Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). M.Sc. thesis. University of Stel-
lenbosch. Stellenbosch.
BEYERS, J.B.P. 1997. New combinations in Lachnaea (Thyme-
laeaceae). Bothalia 27: 45.
BEYERS, J.B.P. & VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. 1995. The generic delim-
itation of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). Botha-
lia 25: 65-85.
BOND. P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora: a
descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany 13:
1^55.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1996. Palynology of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): relationships, form and
function. Grana 35: 335-346.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001. Leaf anatomy of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): taxonomic and ecological
significance. Bothalia 31: 53-70.
BUNNIGER, L. 1 912. Untersuchungen iiber die morphologische Natur
des Hypanthiums bei Myrtales- und Thymelaeales-Familien.
Beitrdge zur Biologic der Pflanzen 48: 79-156.
CONTI, E.. LITT. A. & SYTSMA, K.J. 1996. Circumscription of
Myrtales and their relationship to other rosids: evidence from
rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 83: 221-233.
CORNER, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Vols 1, 2. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
CRONQUIST, A. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering
plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flow-
ering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering
plants. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. 1975a. A system of classification of the
angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of char-
acters. Botaniska Notiser 128: 119-147.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. 1975b. The distribution of characters within an
angiosperm system. I. Some embryological characters. Bota-
niska Notiser 128: 181-197.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. 1980. A revised system of classification of the
angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80:
91-124.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. & THORNE, R.F. 1984. The order Myrtales: cir-
cumscription variation, and relationships. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 633-699.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1988. Structure and rela-
tionships of families endemic to or centred in southern Africa.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 25: 1-94.
DAVIS, G.L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiospems. Wiley,
New York.
DOMKE, W. 1934. Untersuchungen iiber die systematische und geo-
graphische Gliederimg der Thymelaeaceen. E. Schweizer-
bart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nagele) G.M.B.H.,
Stuttgart.
ECKARDT, T. 1937. Untersuchungen iiber Morphologic, Entwick-
lungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung des pseudo-
monomeren Gynoeceums. Nova Acta Leopoldina 5: 43^8.
ENDLICHER, S. 1837. Genera plantarum. Beck, Vienna.
ENDLICHER, S. 1847. Genera plantarum, Suppl. 4, edn 2. Beck,
Vienna.
FAHN, A. 1967. Plant anatomy. Pergamon Press, London.
FEDER, N. & O'BRIEN, TP. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some prin-
ciples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55:
123-142.
GILG, E. 1891. Thymelaeaceae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3:
216-245.
GILG. E. 1894. Studien iiber die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der
Thymelaeales und iiber die ‘anatomische Methode’. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 18: 489-574.
HEINIG, K.H. 1951. Studies in the floral morphology of the
Thymelaeaceae. American Journal of Botany 38: 113-132.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1973. The families of flowering plants, edn 3.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
KARNOVSKY, M.J. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of
high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell
Biology 27: 137a.
LEANDRL J. 1930. Recherches anatomiques sur les Thymeleacees.
Aimales des Sciences Natiirales Botaniqiie 12: 125-237.
LINNAEUS, C. 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Impensis Orphano-
trophei, Brunsvigae.
LINNAEUS, C. 1784. Systema vegetabiliiim. Dieterich, Gottingae.
MAGALLON, S., CRANE, PR. & HERENDEEN. PS. 1999. Phylo-
genetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297-372.
MEISNER, C.F. 1857. Ordo CLXVII. Thymelaeaceae. Prodromus sys-
teniatis naturalis 14: 493-605. Masson, Paris.
MELCHIOR, H. 1964. A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, edn
2. Gebriider Bomtraeger, Berlin.
NOEL, A.R.A. 1983. The endothecium — a neglected criterion in tax-
onomy and phylogeny? Bothalia 14: 833-838.
PETERSON, B, 1978. Thymelaeaceae. Flora of tropical East Africa:
1-37. Whitefriars Press, London.
RAO, VS. & DAHLGREN, R. 1969. The floral anatomy and relation-
ships of Oliniaceae. Botaniska Notiser 122: 160-171.
RICHARDS, A.J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Allen & Unwin,
London.
SPJUT. R.W. 1994. A systematic treatment of fruit types. Memoirs of
the New York Botanical Garden 70: 1-182.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1974. Flowering plants. Evolution above the species
level. Edward Arnold, London.
TAKHTAJAN, A. 1969. Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Oliver
& Boyd, Edinburgh.
TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering
plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
THODAY, D. 1924. XVIII. A revision of Passerina. Kew Bulletin 4:
146-168.
THORNE, R.E. 1992a. Classification and geography of the flowering
plants. The Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
THORNE, R.F. 1992b. An updated phylogenetic classification of the
flowering plants. Afoo 13: 365-389.
WEBERLING, F. 1983. Fundamental features of modern inflorescence
morphology. Bothalia 14: 917-922.
WEBERLING, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
WEBERLING, F. & HERKOMMER, U, 1989. Untersuchungen zur
Inlloreszenzmorphologie der Thymelaeaceen. Tropische und
Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 68: 7-124.
WIKSTROM, J.E. 1818. Granskning af de till Thymelaearum Vax-
tordning horande Slagten och After. Kunglinga Svenska veten-
.skapsakademiens haiidlingar: 265-355.
Bothalia 31,2: 237-240 (2001 )
Miscellaneous notes
ALOACEAE
ARE OVULES AND SEEDS IN LOMATOPHYLLUM WIELD. (ALOE SECT. LOMATOPHYLLUM SENSE AUCT.) ANATROPOUS AND
EXARILLATE?
INTRODUCTION
The seeds of all aloes are enveloped by an extra tissue
that forms an additional covering to the seed coat
(Dahlgren et al. 1985). Known as an aril and sometimes
referred to as a third integument (Joshi 1937; Danilova et
al. 1995), this tissue arises early in the development of
the aloe ovule as a cup-shaped outgrowth of the placen-
ta (Schnarf & Wunderlich 1939) or base of the funicle
(McNaughton & Robertson 1974). The presence of the
broad, impeding structure developing so early and close
to the base of the ovule has a profound influence on the
ultimate shape of the ovule: instead of turning through
180° to reach a completely upside-down (anatropous)
position, the ovule primordium only completes a 90° turn
and becomes hemitropous (Steyn & Smith 1998: fig.
2A). Morphologically, mature ovules of aloes therefore
show two very distinctive characters, namely hemitropy
and broad aril primordia (Steyn & Smith 1998).
In fertilized ovules the aril immediately starts grow-
ing around the developing seed to form a succulent mem-
brane which completely covers the hemitropous seed
body. The succulent tissue of the aril may have adaptive
value by acting as a handy, nearby reservoir for supply-
ing water to the vital, inner ovular tissues in times of
water stress. Having grown around the developing seed,
the aril possibly keeps the tender, immature seed in a
moist atmosphere. As seed development progresses, the
aril tissue extends laterally to fill the spaces among the
seeds in the locules of the capsule (E.M.A. Steyn pers.
obs.). In this way, the wings of aloe seeds are formed.
The shape and size of the wings may be moulded by the
available space in the developing locule (Werker 1997).
In some aloes, for instance Aloe asperifolia A. Berger, A.
claviflora Burch., A. falcata Baker and A. variegata L.
the wings can be large, frilly structures, while in others
the wings are less elaborate or sometimes absent
(Kamstra 1968; Reynolds 1982). At seed maturity the
succulent aril tissue dries out and becomes papery when
the cartilaginous capsule splits open. The winged seeds
are then released to be dispersed by wind.
It has been reasoned that character states may be lost
during evolution of a taxon if they become functionally
superfluous, e.g. an aril will easily become rudimentary
if the fruit becomes indehiscent (Dahlgren 1991). The
question therefore arises whether this has happened in
about 20 species of aloe look-alikes occurring on
Madagascar and the neighbouring islands of Aldabra,
Reunion, Mauritius and Rodrigues. Unlike all other
members of the Aloaceae, these species do not bear cap-
sular fruit, but produce fleshy-fruited, colourful berries
containing wingless black seed (Rowley 1996). Although
some of these ‘berried aloes’ (Rowley 1996) occur in dry
mountainous situations or on dry, hilly banks (Baker
1877), they generally favour a warm, humid forest cli-
mate and rely on animals (birds?) for the dispersal of
their seed (Rauh 1993, 1998). If the wingless seed in the
berries of Lomatophyllum have lost their arils, one would
then expect reports of anatropy in the berried aloes —
suppression of aril development would allow curvature
of the ovule to the anatropous position.
During a preliminary evaluation of literature dealing
with ovule morphology in Asphodelaceae (Steyn &
Smith 1997) we noticed that Schill (1973) described the
ovules of Lomatophyllum Willd. as anatropous, although
the presence (or absence) of an aril was not mentioned in
this 1973 report. However, subsequent research (Steyn &
Smith 1998) on ovule structure in the genera of the
Aloaceae did not include Lomatophyllum ovules, since
suitable material was not available at the time. In addi-
tion to rectifying this omission, the present paper also
includes a report on seed development and seed coat
structure of L. purpureum (Lam.) TDurand & Schinz.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Open flowers and berries were collected in the nurse-
ries of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria from
cultivated plants of Lomatophyllum purpureum (Acces-
sion No. GPTA 3 1155). The plants were propagated from
seed, originally collected by Dr Wendy Strahm on
Mauritius in 1988. For the present study, ovaries, devel-
oping berries and ripe seed were dissected from the flow-
ers or fruit and fixed for 24 h in a 0.1 M cacodylate
buffered solution (pH 7.4) containing 4% formaldehyde
and 2.5% gluteraldehyde. By following the methods of
Feder & O’Brien (1968), ovules and seeds were dehy-
drated in an alcohol series and impregnated with glycol
methacrylate (GMA). The ovules and seed were subse-
quently imbedded in GMA and sectioned in a sagittal
plane at a thickness of 2-3 pm on a Jung RM 2045
microtome. Median sagittal sections were stained with
the periodic acid/Schiff reaction and counterstained with
toluidine blue O (pH 4.4) by using the protocols of
O’Brien & McCully ( 1981 ).
RESULTS
Orientation and structure of ovules
The sessile, trilocular ovary of Lomatophyllum pur-
pureum contains many ovules. Each locule holds several
ovules alternately arranged in two longitudinal rows and
obliquely placed on axile placentae. The ovules are pleu-
rotropous, i.e. the micropyles are turned outwards, facing
the nearest septum (Figure 1 ). In each ovule the micropy-
lar-chalazal (i.e. longitudinal) axis of the ovule is perpen-
dicular to the longitudinal axis of the short funicle (Figure
238
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 1 . — Mature ovule of Loma-
tophyllwn purpiireum in sa-
gittal view, seen in an oblique
section of ovary: a, aril; c,
central cell nucleus; f, filiform
apparatus of synergid; h, hypo-
stase in chalazal nucellus; i,
inner integument forming
endostome; o, outer integu-
ment. Direction of longitudi-
nal axis of short funicle indi-
cated by arrow. Scale bar: 100
pm.
1 ). Thus, during early development and curvature towards
the anatropous position, the ovules of L purpureum have
only turned through 90 ° to become hemitropous.
At the base of the ovule, the aril forms a conspicuous,
broad and many-layered podium for the virtually sessile,
bitegmic ovule (Figure 1). The outer integument is three-
layered and slightly shorter than the two-layered inner
integument, so that the latter alone forms the micropyle
canal. Around the endostome the inner integument com-
prises more than two layers and here the cells have
increased in size. The embryo sac is relatively large, hav-
ing penetrated into the greater part of the micropylar
nucellus, and only the nucellus epidermis has remained.
The micropylar part of the embryo sac contains an egg
cell and two prominent synergids with conspicuous, stri-
ated and strongly PAS-positive filiform apparatus. A
large central cell nucleus, situated directly above three
ephemeral antipodes, occupies the chalazal part of the
embryo sac. The base of the embryo sac is sunken into
the chalazal nucellar tissue. The nucellus cells surround-
ing the base have developed into a prominent hypostase
consisting of thick-walled, dark-staining cells which pos-
sibly prevented further penetration of the embryo sac
into the chalazal nucellus.
Development and structure of aril and seed coat
After fertilization the aril rapidly expands to enfold
the developing seed (Figure 2A). At this stage, the aril
tissue comprises several layers of thin-walled cells with
living protoplasts (Figure 2B). Except for the notably
large cells of the outer epidermis and scattered idioblasts,
the cells of the aril are small and densely packed (Figure
FIGURE 2. — .Seed development in Loinatophylliim purpureum. A, median sagittal section of young seed; B, structure of developing aril and seed
coat in sagittal section: a. aril; b, enlarging embryo sac; d. outer epidermis of testa; e, epidermis of nucellus; g, inner epidermis of testa; j,
outer epidermis oftegmen; k, inner epidermis of tegmen; n. chalazal nucellus; s, developing testa; t, developing tegmen; u, funicle; w, fruit
wall. Position of micropyle indicated by curved arrow. Scale bars: A, 500 pm: B, 100 pm.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
239
FIGURE 3. — Mature seed structure in Lomatophyllum purpureum. A, ripe seed in longitudinal section showing: a, aril: m, large straight embryo
in endosperm; n, some remains of nucellus; u. funicle. Position of micropyle indicated by curved arrow. B, structure of aril and seed coat
in ripe seed: curved arrow, outer epidermis of aril; straight arrow, flattened cell layers of testa and tegmen; g, outer epidermis of testa filled
with phytomelan; p, endosperm. Scale bars: A, 500 pm; B, 100 pm.
2A, B). During enlargement of the embryo sac and the
concurrent increase in circumference of the seed, the aril
possibly keeps pace by marginal growth, i.e. cell divi-
sions in the overlapping tips. Later, when the endosperm
becomes fdled with reserves and seed ripening occurs,
the thin-walled aril tissue collapses. Only the outer epi-
dermis remains as a thin layer of tangentially stretched
cells covering the seed (Figure 3 A, B).
During the enlargement of the growing seed the layers
of both the tegmen (inner integument) and testa (outer
integument) are discernible. The tegmen comprises two
to three layers of thin-walled and closely packed cells,
easily discernible from the adjacent cells of the nucellus
epidermis and testa (Figure 2A, B ). At this stage, the testa
consists of six to eight cell layers. The small, inner epi-
dermal cells have large nuclei and are still in an actively
dividing stage. The outer epidermis cells are noticeably
larger than the cells of the other layers and later become
filled with dark-staining deposits of phytomelan.
Eventually, when seed ripening occurs, the structure of
the outer epidermis cells breaks down, but the black pig-
ment remains as a melanin crust covering the collapsed
cell layers of the testa and tegmen (Figure 3B).
The hemitropous nature of the ovule is retained dur-
ing seed development, although some curvature towards
the ventral side occurs in the distal part of the funicle
(Figure 2A). The ripe seed contains some remains of the
nucellar tissue (perisperm) in the chalazal region. The
linear embryo is straight and occupies more than three-
quarters of the length of the seed (Figure 3A).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Our results on L. purpureum strongly suggest that
Schill’s (1973) conception of anatropy in the ovules of
Lomatophyllym was erroneous, and that ovule curvature in
Lomatophyllum is arrested in the hemitropous stage of the
ovule primordium by the presence of a broad aril at the base
of the funicle. A re-evaluation of Schill’s data strengthens
our view; his own micrograph (Schill 1973; 277, fig. 3),
depicting a transverse section of the ovary of L citreum
Guillaumin. clearly shows hemitropous ovules above the
aril primordia in the locules. This micrograph was not
intended to illustrate ovule curvature, but to show that the
dorsal walls of the locules in the fmit of Lomatophyllum
remain intact and do not open by median splits like those of
Aloe viquieri H.Perrier (Schill 1973; fig. 4).
During seed formation the growing seed of L. pur-
pureum is eventually enfolded by arillate tissue. Although
elaborate wings do not develop from this tissue as is often
the case in Aloe, the remains of the aril can still be iden-
tified in the ripe, hemitropous seed. Internal ovular struc-
ture in L. purpureum also conforms to that of Aloe and the
other genera of the Aloaceae (Astroloba, Chortolirion,
Gasteria, Haworthia and Poellnitzia) investigated by
Steyn & Smith (1998). Among the characters shared, are
a prominent hypostase, a conspicuous central cell lying
directly above the ephemeral antipodes and synergids
containing striated, well-developed filiform apparatus
that are strongly PAS-positive.
The results obtained in this investigation lend support
for the proposal of Rowley (1996) to subsume Lomato-
phyllum under Aloe, but this may be an oversimplifica-
tion of a rather intricate taxonomy (Rauh 1998). The
genus remains controversial as evidenced by Newton
(1998) who expressed the view that the species in the
genus do not necessarily form a natural infra-generic
group within Aloe.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1877. Flora of Mauritius and the Seychelles: a descrip-
tion of the flowering plants and ferns of those islands: 374.
Reeve, London.
DAHLGREN. G. 1991. Steps toward a natural system of the dicotyle-
dons: embryological characters. Aliso: 107-165.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T., CLIFFORD, H.T. & YEO. P.F. 1985. The fami-
lies of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution and taxonomy:
179-182. Springer Verlag. Berlin.
DANILOVA, M.F., NEMIROVICH-DANCHENKO. E.N.. KOMAR.
G.A. & LODKINA, M.M. 1995. The seed structure of mono-
cotyledons. In RJ. Rudall, RJ. Cribb. D.F. Cutler & C.J. Hum-
240
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
phries. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution'. 461^72,
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
FEDER, N. & O’BRIEN, T.R 1968. Plant microtechnique: some princi-
ples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55: 123-142.
JOSHl. A.C. 1937. Megasporogenesis in Aloe vera Linn. Journal of the
Indian Botanical Society 15: 297-300.
KAMSTRA. M."W. 1968. Aloe seeds. Aloe 6,2: 8-10, 23-27.
MCNAUGHTON, J.E. & ROBERTSON, B.L. 1974. Megasporogene-
sis and megagametogenesis in Aloe africana Mill. Journal of
South African Botany 40: 75-79.
NEWTON, L.E. 1998. A new species of Aloe (Aloaceae) on Pemba,
with comments on section Lomatophyllum. Cactus and
Succulent Journal 70: 27-31.
O’BRIEN, T.P. & McCULLY, M.E. 1981. The study of plant structure:
principles and selected methods'. 4.19-4.22, 6.81-6.88.
Termacarpi, Melbourne.
RAUH, W. 1993. Lomatophyllum belavenokense Rauh & Gerold spec,
nov., a new species from south-eastern Madagascar. Excelsa 16:
1-6.
RAUH, W. 1998. Three new species of Lomatophyllum and one new
Aloe from Madagascar. Bradleva 16: 92-100.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1982. The aloes of South Africa, edn 4. Balkema,
Cape Town.
ROWLEY, G.D. 1996. The berried aloes: Aloe section Lomatophyllum.
Excelsa 17: 59-62.
SCHILL, R. 1973. Studien zur systematische Stellung der Gattung
Lomatophyllum Willd. — ein Vergleich mit Aloe Tourn.
(Liliaceae). Beitrdge zur Biologic der Pflanzen 49: 273-289.
SCHNARF, K. & WUNDERLICH, R. 1939. Zur vergleichenden
Embryologie der Liliaceae-Asphodeloideae. Flora 133:
297-327.
STEYN, E.M.A. & SMITH, G.F. 1997. Ovule structure in Trachyandra
saltii (Asphodelaceae). South African Journal of Botany 63:
223-226.
STEYN, E.M.A. & SMITH, G.F. 1998. Ovule orientation, curvature
and internal structure in the Aloaceae. South African Journal of
Botany 64: 192-197.
WERKER, E. 1997. Seed anatomy. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie,
special issue 10,3: 283. Bomtraeger, Berlin.
E.M.A. STEYN* and G.F. SMITH*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2000-11-27.
Bothalia31,2: 241-244 (2001)
OBITUARY
HEINRICH JOHANN WILHELM GIESS (1910-2000)
Willi Giess (Figure 1 ), as he was known to most, was
bom on 21 Febmary 1910 in Frankfurt am Main,
Germany. He was the elder of the two sons of Wilhelm
and Lilly Giess. He completed his schooling at the
‘Adlerflycht Realschule’ in Frankfurt in 1925. The Giess
family then emigrated to South West Africa in 1926
(Kolberg & Strohbach 2000; Gunn & Codd 1981).
Willi Giess started working as a volunteer on farms at
the tender age of 16 until he enrolled for a diploma in
agriculture at the Neudamm Agricultural College near
Windhoek from 1928 to 1929 (Kolberg & Strohbach
2000). He was one of the first three students that were
registered at Neudamm. During his subsequent career he
often re-visited Neudamm as a lecturer to try and impart
his knowledge of local rangelands, as well as a love for
the local flora, to budding young farmers.
In 1931 Willi Giess contracted Malta fever and, as
was quite common in those days, was sent to Germany to
recuperate. Tme to his nature, he was not satisfied with
FIGURE 1. — Heinrich Johann Wilhelm Giess (1910-2000).
spending time resting, but enrolled at the Animal
Breeding Institute (Herdbuch-Abteilung der Karakul-
schafzucht, Tierzuchtinstitut der Universitat Halle). He
completed his training as Technical Adviser for Karakul
Breeding in 1933 and returned to South West Africa
where he applied his newly gained knowledge as manag-
er of a karakul farm. After four years, Willi Giess pur-
chased his own farm, Dornfontein-Sud, between
Dordabis and Leonardville in the east-central part of the
country (Kolberg & Strohbach 2000).
Soon World War II followed and Willi Giess, togeth-
er with a number of others who later were to become
well-known botanists, was interned at Andalusia (now
Jan Kempdorp, South Africa) for six years. The
‘Andalusia Camp University’ was promptly established
and under the guidance of the late Prof. O.H. Volk, Giess
studied plant taxonomy. A number of plants were col-
lected from the area in the camp that was accessible to
internees, identified and drawn (Figure 2). He con-
tributed significantly to the booklet Bestimmungs-
schliissel fiir siidwesl-afrikanische Grasgattungen by
producing engravings on tomato-box wood for the illus-
tration of the key (Glen & Perold 2000). He was allowed
to return to his farm in December 1946 after having col-
lected plants in the Cape with the University of
Stellenbosch as his base.
In 1953, initiated by Prof. Dr H. Walter of the Uni-
versity of Hohenheim, Germany, the Director of
Agriculture, Dr J.S. Watt, agreed to establish a botanical
section within the directorate. Prof. Walter donated over
2000 herbarium specimens and Willi Giess agreed to
temporarily work on the development of a herbarium.
For four years he travelled weekly from his farm
Bergland, about 50 km south of Windhoek, into town. In
1957 the SWA Administration took Giess into permanent
employment as curator of what was then the SWA
Herbarium (Giess 1978). He held this post until his
retirement in 1975, but continued to work in the herbari-
um until 1980 under the new curator, the late Dr Mike
Muller (Gunn & Codd 1981). From April 1985 to
January 1986 he was again acting curator while his suc-
cessor completed his Ph.D. degree.
Willi Giess made an important contribution to the col-
lection of what is now the National Herbarium of
Namibia (WIND). Of the ± 73 000 specimens in the pre-
sent-day collection, about 18 750 were collected by him,
often together with others like O. Volk, D. van Vuuren,
B. de Winter and H. Merxmiiller. These specimens were
always collected in triplicate, often more. Anyone who
has ever collected for a herbarium will appreciate the
amount of work involved in such a collection. Even
today, the Giess specimens, with their carefully typed or
hand-written data labels, are often the best, if not the
only ones of a certain species, to be found in the collec-
tion of the National Herbarium.
242
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
FIGURE 2. — Ipomoea bolusiana
painted by W. Giess in 1942.
During his collecting trips, Giess covered almost the
entire country (Figure 3). Important collections, which
have to a large extent not been repeated in years following
his expeditions, are those made in the Kaukauveld (later
known as Bushmanland), Andara area on the Okavango
River, Brandberg area, Luderitz District (Aus,
Zebrafontein, Namuskluft, Witputz), Farm Ameib in the
Erongo Mountains and the Kaokoveld. Plant collecting
trips to the Kaokoveld in the late 1950s must have been
quite a feat, considering that even to this day, with modem
vehicles, equipment, maps, GPSs and improved roads, a
trip to the Kaokoveld is considered somewhat of an adven-
ture! The collected specimens of Merxmiiller and Giess
were often the basis for taxon descriptions in the
Prodromus einer Flora von SUdwestafrika, the last volume
of which was completed in 1971, and to date is still the
only reference work for many Namibian plant groups.
Other collections that made a considerable difference
to botanical knowledge in Namibia were his many index
cards of indigenous plant names. When Willi Giess
moved from Windhoek to Swakopmund, just two months
before his death, these valuable boxes of cards were
donated to the National Botanical Research Institute
where they will be incorporated into a proposed publica-
tion of local common names for plants.
• Up to 100 specimens collected per grid
s Between 101 and 300 specimens collected per grid
▲ Between 301 and 600 specim ens collected per grid
FIGURE 3. — Quarter-degree grid
squares in Namibia where W.
Giess collected herbarium
specimens.
Bothalia3l.2 (2001)
243
Willi Giess first published the journal Dinteria (named
in honour of Prof. Kurt Dinter, Namibia’s first official
botanist) under the auspices of the South West Africa
Scientific Society in November 1968. He remained editor
until 1991 (vol. 21). The journal aimed at making contri-
butions to the flora and vegetation of Namibia. In vol. 4
(1971), Giess first published his Preliminary vegetation
map of South West A frica, which was re-printed twice — in
1978 and 1998, and is still the only approximation to a veg-
etation map of Namibia to this day (Kolberg & Strohbach
2000). Despite his very busy schedule, he managed to pub-
lish several papers (see end of this obituary; Giess 1989),
ranging from popular to scientific articles, including the
description of a number of new plant species: Aloe argen-
ticauda Merxm. & Giess, A. dewinteri Giess, A. narniben-
sis Giess, Aristida dewinteri Giess, Spliaeranthus wattii
Giess ex Merxm., Tridentea marientalesis (Nel) L.C.Leach
subsp. albipilosa (Giess) L.C.Leach and Zygophyllum
schreiberianum Merxm. & Giess.
Whilst in retirement, Giess utilized his very compre-
hensive private literature collection to compile the
Bibliography of South West African Botany, published by
the SWA Scientific Society in 1989.
The pioneering work of Willi Giess did not go unno-
ticed in the international botanical world. He was hon-
oured on several occasions: in July 1964, he became a
Correspondent of the Naturhistorisches Museum in
Vienna; in 1968, the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences
in Stockholm awarded him the Great Linee Medal in
Silver; on the 200th anniversary of the birth of Alexander
von Humboldt. Willi Giess received a commemorative
issue on the life of Von Humboldt from the consul of the
Federal Republic of Germany to honour his achievements
in the field of botany; the Ba\ arian Academy of Science
honoured him with the Bene Merenti Medal for his con-
tributions to the Prodromus einer Flora von Sudwest-
afrika; the South African Association of Botanists award-
ed him a Certificate of Merit in 1979; in 1980, Giess
received the Academy Medal in Gold from the South
African Academy of Science and Arts; and in 1998, the
Windhoek Municipality honoured Willi Giess by naming
a street after him.
A number of plant species were named in honour of
Giess, bearing testament to his collecting efforts and the
assistance he gave to numerous scientists the world over;
Isoetes giessii Launert, Aizoon giessii Friedrich. Salsola
giessii Botsch., Crassula ausensis Hutch, subsp. giessii
(Friedrich) Toelken, Indigofera giessii A.Schreib.,
Zygophyllum giessii (Merxm.) A.Schreib., Euphorbia
giessii L.C.Leach, Commiphora giessii J.J.A.van der
Walt. Heliotropiurn giessii Friedr.-Holzh., Jarnesbritte-
nia giessii Hilliard, Petalidium giessii RG.Mey., Erio-
cephalus giessii M.A.N. Muller, Senecio giessii Merxm.,
Lachenalia giessii W.F.Barker and Stipagrostis giessii
Kers.
His keen interest and an eye for the unknown, meant
that he often also collected insects associated with
plants. In this way, a termite, Okavangoterrnes giessii
(Coaton 1971), and a beetle, Zophosis (Protodactylus)
giessii (Koch 1962), were also named after him since he
collected the first specimens. The former is a monotyp-
ic genus and is known from only a single site east of
Rundu. The beetle is the most widespread of the
Protodactylus subgenus and occurs along the outer mar-
gin of the Namib Desert from Gobabeb to Rosh Pinah.
I had the pleasure of working with Willi Giess for
merely one year and was absolutely amazed by the
wealth of his knowledge. For every species, locality or
collector, he had some anecdote to tell or some memories
to share. I remember going on a short field trip with him
to collect material for Mike Muller, who was struggling
through his Ph.D. in Stellenbosch. While passing his for-
mer farm Bergland, he showed me a fair-sized hill, which
he had de-bushed manually in the early 1950s. To this
day, the vegetation on this hill is visibly different from
those nearby. Every little hill or farm we passed he would
have something to say, like: ‘Oh yes. Aloe viridiflora
occurs in these koppies. I collected it there in 19 ’or
‘When old so-and-so had this farm, the grazing condi-
tions looked much better!’ or ‘We spent three days under
this tree in 19.... when our car broke down and we had to
wait for the Government Garage to send a mechanic.’ I
continued to be amazed by this extraordinary person
when, about 20 years after retirement, he could still iden-
tify just about any plant you presented to him!
It was also a great inspiration to see Willi Giess and
his wife Brigitte (formerly Bleissner) work together and
support each other in all aspects of life. If one of them
forgot where something was written or to be found, the
other would remember. From 1963 to 1980 Brigitte
Giess assisted her husband in the herbarium and accom-
panied him on his many collecting trips on a voluntary
basis. Together with Volk they collected a large number
of specimens in the early 1960s. Sadly his partner and
soul-mate pre-deceased him in 1999.
Willi Giess died in Swakopmund on 28 September
2000. It is with sadness that we say farewell to our friend,
colleague and mentor. Namibian botany would have been
much the poorer without his invaluable pioneering work.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I gratefully acknowledge the information received
from Dr E. von Koenen. Patricia Craven is thanked for
producing the map, extracting information on Giess col-
lections from the WIND database and making some
valuable suggestions for inclusion in this text. The use of
data from the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is
gratefully acknowledged. My appreciation also to
Eugene Marais for providing information on the insects
mentioned in this article. Many thanks to Gillian Maggs-
Kdlling, who reviewed drafts of this paper.
REFERENCES
GIESS. W. 1978. 25 Jahre Landesherbarium Stidwestafrika. Mitteilungen
der SWA Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft XIX/2: 3-5.
GIESS. W. 1989. Bibliography of South West African Botany. SWA
Scientific Society, Windhoek.
GLEN, H.F. & PEROLD, S.M. 2000. Obituary; Otto Heinrich Volk
(1903-2000). Bothalia 30: 215-224.
GUNN. M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa: 400. Balkema, Cape Town.
KOLBERG. H. & STROHBACH, B. 2000. Obituary: Heinrich Johann
Wilhelm Giess (1910-2000). Dinteria 26: 21-24.
244
Bothalia 31.2 (2001 )
PUBLICATIONS BY W. GIESS
EISEB. E.. GIESS, W & HAACKE, W.H.G. 1991 . A preliminary list of
Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara) plant names. Dinteria 21: 17-30.
GAFF. D.F. & GIESS, W. 1985. Drought resistance in water plants in
rock pools of southern Africa. Dinteria 18: 17-36.
GIESS, W. 1962a. Some notes on the vegetation of the Namib Desert
with a list of plants collected in the area visited by the Carp-
Transvaal Museum Expedition during May 1959. Cimbebasia
2:1-35.
-1962b. Wunder unserer Flora — Wonderwereld van ons plantegroei —
Wonders of our flora. Kleine Reihe 5: 1-34. Afrika Verlag. Der
Kreis, Windhoek.
-1962c. Herbarium und Planzensammeln, aus der Praxis fur die Praxis.
Wissenschaflliche Forschimg in Siidwestafrika 1 : 38^3. SWA
Scientific Society. Windhoek.
-1965. Die Vegetationsverhiiltnisse (des Schwarzen Nossobgebietes).
In H.W. Stengel. Der Schwarze Nossob. Wissenschaftliche For-
schimg in Siidwestafrika 4: 45^9. SWA Scientific Society,
Windhoek, (translated into English and Afrikaans)
-1966a. 'Veldkost' in Siidwestafrika. Journal of South West Africa
Scientific Society 20; 59-68.
-1966b. Hoodia pan'iflora N.E.Br., eine fiir Siidwestafrika neue Hoodia-
Art. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlimg, Miinchen
6: 239-243.
-1966c. Plantkundige versamelingsritte in Suidwes-Afrika. SWA Annual
1966: 21-25.
-1966d. The ‘Veldkost’ of South West Africa. SWA Annual 1966:
105-107.
-1968a. Kurt Dinter. Dinteria 1: 4-7.
-1968b. A short report on the vegetation of the Namib coastal area from
Swakopmund to Cape Frio. Dinteria 1: 13-29.
-1968c. Die Gattung Rhigozum Burch, und ihre Arten in Siidwest-
afrika. Dinteria 1: 31-51.
-1969a. Die Verbreitung von Lindernia intrepidus (Dinter) Oberm.
(Chamaegigas intrepidus Dinter) in Siidwestafrika. Dinteria 2:
23-27.
-1969b. Prodromus einer Flora von Siidwestafrika. Dinteria 2: 29-36.
-1969c. Welwitschia mirabilis Hook. fil. Dinteria 3: 1-55.
-1970a. Eine neue Aloe aus der Namib {Aloe namibensis Giess).
Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlimg, Miinchen 8:
123-126.
-1970b. Ein Beitrag zur Flora des Etoscha Nationalparks. Dinteria 5:
19-55.
-1970c. Moringa ovalifolia, die boom van die sprokieswoud in die
Nasionale Etosha Wildtuin. Dinteria 5: 57, 58.
-1970d. Die Verbreitung von Moringa ovalifolia Dinter & Berger in
Siidwestafika. Dinteria 5: 59-64.
-197()e. Pflanzenwunder in Vley, Pfannen und Wassertiiinplen im
trockenen Siidwestafrika. SWA Annual 1970: 181-183.
-1971a. Gramineae, a new species of Aristida from South West Africa.
(Aristida dewinteri Giess). Bothalia 10: 365, 366.
-1971b. A preliminary vegetation map of South West Africa. (Text in
English. German & Afrikaans). Dinteria 4: 1-1 14.
-1972a. Vegetation types. In W.G.H. Coaton & J.D. Sheasby,
Preliminary report on a survey of the termites (Isoptera) of
South West Africa. Cimbebasia Memoir 2: 15.
-1972b. Der Botanische Garten auf der Farm Lichtenstein bei Wind-
hoek im Jahre 1922. Dinteria 7: 13-15.
-1973. A new species of Aloe from South West Africa. (Aloe dewinteri
Giess). Bothalia 11: 120-122.
-1974a. Zwei Fahrten zur Jensenobotrva lossowiana Herre. Dinteria
10: 3-12.
-1974b. South West Africa: Flora. Standard Encyclopedia of South Africa
10: 149-150. Nasou, Cape Town.
-1974c. Beobachtungen zur Siidwester Flora. Dinteria 10: 35^4.
-1974d. Eine neue Stapelie aus Siidwestafrika. (Stapelia albipilosa
Giess). Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlimg, Miinchen
11: 349-352.
-1976. A preliminary vegetation map of South West Africa. Boissiera
24: 651.
-1978a. 25 Jahre Landesherbarium Siidwestafrika. Mitteilungen der
SW4 Wissenschaftlichen GeselLschaft XlX/2: 3-5.
-1978b. Die boom van die sprokieswoud in die Nasionale Etosha
Wildtuin. Staatsmuseum Windhoek 9: 10-12.
-1978c. Ein schbner botanischer Fund. (Drosera indica). Mitteilungen
der SWA Wissenschaftlichen GeselLschaft XIX/2: 6.
-1979. The genus Criniim in South West Africa. The Indigenous Bulb
Growers Association of South Africa 28: 1-6.
-1981a. Pflanzen der Namib. SWA Annual 1981 : 34— 41 .
-1981b. Eine botanische Namibfahrt. SWA Annual 1981: 81-86.
-1981c. Die in der Zentralen Namib von Stidwestafrika/Namibia fes-
gestellten Pflanzenarten und ihre Biotope. Dinteria 15: 13-72.
-1982a. Weitere Neunachweise zur Flora des Brandberges. Dinteria
16: 7-9.
-1982b. Zur Verbreitung des Tabaks in Siidwestafrika (Nicotiana afri-
cana Merxm.). Dinteria 16: 11-20.
-1984a. Die Pflanzenwelt des GroBen Gamsbergs. Journal of South
West Africa Scientific Society XXXVlll : 29-41 .
-1984b. Short note on Brachystelma blepharanthera Huber. Dinteria
17:81,82.
-1989a. Einiges zu unserer Flechtenflora. Dinteria 20: 30-32.
-1989b. Bibliography of South West African Botany. 236. SWA Scien-
tific Society, Windhoek.
GIESS, W. & SNYMAN, J.W. 1986. The naming and utilisation of
plant life by the Zu’hoasi Bushmen of the Kau-Kauveld. In R.
Vossen & K. Keuthmann. Contemporary studies on Khoisan I
& II. In Honour of Oswin Kohler on the occasion of his 75th
birthday: 237-346. Buske, Hamburg.
GIESS, W. & TINLEY, K.L. 1968. South West Africa (with vegetation
map of SWA). Conservation of vegetation in Africa south of the
Sahara. Acta phytogeographica suecica 54: 250-253.
MERXMULLER, H. & GIESS, W. 1974. Aloe pachygaster Dinter und
eine damit verwechselte neue Art. (Aloe argenticauda).
Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlimg, Miinchen 11;
437-444.
ROBINSON, E.R. & GIESS, W. 1974. Report on the plants noted in
the course of a trip from Liideritz Bay to Spencer Bay, January
10-21, 1974. Dinteria 10: 13-17.
HERTA KOLBERG*
* National Plant Genetic Resources Centre, National Botanical Research
Institute, Private Bag 13184, Windhoek, Namibia.
Bothalia31.2: 245 (2001)
Book Review
MEDICINAL. POISONOUS. AND EDIBLE PLANTS IN NAMIBIA
by EBERHARD VON KOENEN, translation of German edn 2. Klaus
Hess Publishers, Windhoek-Gottingen. 2001. Pp. 335. 128 full-page
black-and-white drawings. 6 figures (maps and graphs). A4 size, hard
cover. ISBN Namibia 99916-747-4-8. ISBN Germany 3-9804518-7-9.
Price: ZAR 350.
'The rigid barriers that existed between conventional and alterna-
tive medicine are beginning to open up. The awareness is growing that
the greatest benefit for the sick lies not in opposing but in combining
the different methods of healing. Experience at my Windhoek surgery
has shown the versatility and effectiveness of natural remedies in close
collaboration with orthodox medicine. Many pharmacies which in the
past stocked only pharmaceutical medicines, today keep large supplies
of homeopathic and phytotherapeutic remedies'. Observations similar
to these, made in the preface, are discussed in an article in the New
Scientist of 26 May (Anon. 2001 ): ‘Billions a year are spent worldwide
on herbal medicines. In the US the use of complementary and alterna-
tive medicine has doubled in the past decade. In Britain almost half the
adult population admits to using an alternative therapy'. In southern
Africa more than 80 % of the population subscribe to traditional medi-
cal care. According to a recent estimate, some 20 million people in
South Africa alone consume almost 20 000 tonnes of plant material per
year during 90 million incidents of use (Mander 1998). Witness, there-
fore. the growing number of publications dealing with plants and their
power to heal, to feed and to kill. A forthcoming publication by the
National Botanical Institute (Arnold et al. in prep.) cites 16 major
works dealing with African ethnomedicinal plants which have appeared
during the last 10 to 12 years alone.
The predecessor of the present work first appeared in 1 977 under the
title Heil- und Giftpflanzen in Siidwestafrika. It has since gone through
several reprints and a second edition in German. The present book is a
translation of this latest edition. Binding, paper and printing are still of
a similar exceptionally high standard as in the first edition, and text and
illustrations have been considerably expanded. The introductory chapter.
The Natural Environment, presents an overview of the climate, geology,
physiography and vegetation of Namibia, illustrated by maps, graphs
and diagrams. Under the heading. The Biotopes, ten striking full-page
pencil drawings of Namibian landscapes by the author are included,
from barren wind-swept dune wastes and wide drainage lines support-
ing isolated specimens of Welwitschia in the Namib. to mopane savan-
na and the 'Fairy forest' along the Omaruru River.
Among the healers, and sometimes mischief-makers, as the author
puts it. he distinguishes three main groups: the traditional healers, the
soothsayers or clairvoyants and the black magicians. The soothsayer
must have a disposition for spiritual perception, he tosses bones or
sticks and draws conclusions from their position and thus finds the
causes of diseases, disasters or inexplicable deaths. The black magician
is an evil-doer; he sends disaster, lingering illness and death to others.
The traditional healer uses many medicinal herbs, physical healing
techniques and various utensils in order to invoke metaphysical forces
to neutralise the symptoms of a disease. The essential role of the tradi-
tional healer is today recognised by Public Health Services in many
parts of the world, including Namibia and southern Africa at large.
Dr von Koenen has acquired his knowledge of the healing, feeding
and harmful potential of plants primarily in Namibia, from traditional
healers and herb experts in all regions of the country. This is reflected
in the many common names of plants in 13 of the languages spoken in
Namibia. In the words of the author: ‘In receiving and handing over
this knowledge. I have also assumed the responsibility of pointing out
incessantly that the healing plants are meant to serve the ill and not the
greed for profit of unwelcome moneymakers’. Here he may have
thought of species such as Harpagophytum procwnbens. the Devil’s
claw or Grapple plant, here referred to as Wool spider: some 40 years
ago a dreaded weed; today, due to its extreme popularity as a healing
plant, especially in Central Europe, occasional to rare, except in more
remote or protected areas. And there are numerous much rarer species
which are seriously threatened by plant collectors. Von Koenen adds
another caveat; ‘It should not be expected that the whole range of
medicinal herbs can be recommended for the pharmaceutical process.
Interest should initially be focused on those plants which are used by
different healers to treat more or less the same syndromes.’
The 600 species dealt with — two fungi, five ferns, one gymnosperm
and 592 flowering plants-are numbered and arranged in alphabetical
sequence with an indication of the family to which they belong. The 49
families of vascular plants represented are also shown on a separate
alphabetical list ending with the two groups to which the two fungi
belong. This is followed by a list of families in ‘botanical’ (± Englerian)
order with all species of a given family arranged in alphabetical
sequence. An alphabetical list of all species dealt with precedes a listing
of the southern African distribution of all species in terms of countries
or provinces. A diagram describing the degree square system and a map
of Namibia explain the method according to which the distribution of
species is indicated. Abbreviations used for the 13 ethnic groups or lan-
guages cited as source for the vernacular names are given, and the per-
sons responsible for the naming and the descriptions of the species are
mentioned. The bibliography comprises 45 literature sources.
The treatment of each species begins with the number assigned to
it in the work. and. in the case of trees, with the National Tree Number.
They are followed by the scientific name and family, and a list of the
common names. Eor some of the more common plants, such as Euclea
divinorum, the Wild ebony, or Pterocarpus angolensis, the Transvaal
teak, vernacular names in ten different languages are listed, and for
most other plants in at least three or more. The plant descriptions are
brief and image-forming and the translators have attempted to follow
the free, sometimes almost florid style of the author. The discussion of
the importance of the plant is usually much longer than the descrip-
tions. consisting, on average, of 200 words or more. The source of the
information is indicated — no. 42 (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk, The
medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa, edn 2.
1962) is the most commonly cited reference. The species treatments
end with an indication of the distribution in Namibia.
One hundred and seventeen species are illustrated on full-plate
drawings by the author. 40 more than in the first German edition. The
new drawings can easily be distinguished: they are not signed and dated
by the author and shading on them is not brought about by stippling, as
in the old drawings, but by stippling combined with grey toning. In con-
trast to the old drawings they therefore had to be screened before they
could be printed. The grey tones often run over the lines, and the new
drawings therefore tend to lack the clear outlines of the old ones. All in
all. 1 prefer the ones from edition 1 . In most cases the artist has caught
enough diagnostic features to make the species recognisable. Soft
leaves, however, often look leathery, and cylindrical organs may look
rather flat. The drawing of Diospyros lycioides subsp. lycioides should
rather have been omitted. The work ends with a list of vernacular
names, a subject index excluding plant names, acknowledgements,
subscriber list and a short curriculum vitae of the author.
Let me conclude with a brief quote from a typical conversation
between the author and a traditional healer: '1 am doing this work not for
my personal profit but in the interest of our country and our fellow coun-
trymen. It must be done today, for the old. who stiU have the knowledge, will
take it with them into the grave. And when you ask the young, you will
mostly just get the reply: a pill is more convenient. But if some day the
urgent question is asked about the medicinal plants which grow in our
country — and the day will come — and there is nobody left who knows,
this book, as the outcome of our work, will provide the answer’.
REFERENCES
ANON. 2001. Hype, hope and healing. New Scientist 2292: 28-30.
ARNOLD, T., PRENTICE, C. A., HAWKER. L.C., SNYMAN. E.E.,
TOMALIN, M., CROUCH, N.R. & POTTAS-BIRCHER, C. in
prep. Medicinal and magical plants of southern Africa: an anno-
tated checklist. Strelitzia.
MANDER, M. 1998. The marketing of medicinal plants in South
Africa: a case study in KwaZulu-Natal. FAO, Rome.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK. M.G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa, edn 2.
Livingstone, Edinburgh & London.
O.A. LEISTNER
' ,
'
^iiWrtWV' I
j'Op*
■•ecr''
»itK/Kim9i
rw-ii
,'mci
. ^4b jdP*
^4£"=.
■ ‘ s
■■■$''
Bothalia 31,2: 247-263 (2001)
National Botanical Institute South Africa:
administration and research staff 31 March 2001,
publications 1 April 2000-31 March 2001
Compiler: B.A. Momberg
CHIEF DIRECTORATE (ADIR)
CAPE TOWN— PEARSON HOUSE
Huntley, Prof. B.J. M.Sc. Chief Executive Officer
Adams, Ms M.A. Typist/Receptionist
Laidler, Mrs S.A. B.Sc. (Agric.) (Hons) Personal Assistant
MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION SUBDIRECTORATE (AMAR)
CAPE TOWN
Moeng, S. M.A. (Languages). Deputy Director
Davis, G.W. Ph.D. Assistant Director. Programme Development/Fundraising
Cole-Rous, Ms J. B.A. (Hons. )(Linguistics), B.A. (French). Senior Communications Officer. Media
Mulder, Mrs G.P. Senior Pers. Assistant Cert. III. Secretary /Typist
Mafu, Ms N.N. Travel & Tourism Cert. Communications Officer. Tourism Development
GRAPHIC SERVICES— CAPE TOWN (AMAR)
Loedolff, Mrs J. B.Sc.(Ind.Tech.). Chief Industrial Technician. Photographer/Illustrator (part time)
VISITORS CENTRE— CAPE TOWN (AMAR)
Gibson-Dicks, Ms C. Senior Communications Officer. Centre Supervisor
Dyers, Mrs G. Nat.Sec.Cert.N6. Principal Typist 1
Fredericks, Ms N.C.E. Senior Information Officer
Jacobs, A.P. Chief Information Officer
Jacobs, Ms B.C. Senior Administration Clerk 1
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTORATE (APER)
CAPE TOWN
Tlali, P.L.N. B.Iuris Lib. Director. Human Resources
Letsoalo, M.R. B.A. (Hons.), Human Resources Management Cert. Assistant Director (Pretoria)
Comelissen, Mrs A.M. Secretary to the Board
Finca, Ms N.F. Administration Aid 11
Haupt, Mrs C.S. Administration Aid II. Guest house
Kriel, Mrs G.A. Dip. Sec. Senior Secretary IV
PERSONNEL— CAPE TOWN
Van Zyl, J.M. M.Econ.dnd. Psych.). Assistant Director: Organizational Development & Training
Engelbrecht, B. N.Dip.(Hort.), N.Dip.(PRM), Dip. (Forestry). Assistant Director: Management and services
Staal, PB. Industrial Relations Cert. Assistant Director: Labour relations
De Jonge, Ms K. Principal Typist 11. Personnel Officer Mtyalela, D.M.S. Senior Training Officer
Claassen, Ms G. Senior Telkom Operator I Nicholas, Mrs W.L. Senior Photocopy Machine Operator
Crowie, A.C. Senior Registry Clerk I Petersen, R.E. Principal Personnel Officer
Dollie, Mrs N.J. Administration Aid II Sass, Ms D. Administration Clerk II
Du Toit, Ms R. H.E.D. Senior Training Officer Williams, Mrs L.R. Dip. Sec. Senior Personnel Officer II
Fredericks, C.H. Courier II
248
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES— PRETORIA (RPTA)
Letsoalo, M.R. B. A. (Hons.), Human Resources Management Cert. Assistant Director
Gotzel, Mrs A. Senior Telecom. Operator III
Khumalo, N.P. Principal General Foreman. Supervisor:
Office services
Makgobola, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Malefo, Mrs R.P. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Maphuta, Mrs M.S. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Moswete, J.T. Principal Foreman. Maintenance
Nkosi, Mrs M.P. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Phaahla, M.C. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Sithole, A.M. Administration Aid I. Cleaner
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Administration Officer. Personnel
FINANCE DIRECTORATE (AEIN)
CAPE TOWN
Hughes, W.S.G. B.Com., C.A.(SA). Director
Maholwana, S. B.Com. Assistant Director. Financial Management
Neuwirth, Ms E.V. Assistant Director. Staff benefits
Rawoot, N.A. B.Acc.Sc. Assistant Director. Internal Audit
Africa, S. B.Tech. Internal Auditor
Bagus, Ms E.J. Senior Accountant: General ledger
Cassiem, Ms S. Senior Accounts Clerk III. Staff benefits
& salaries
Cooper, S.K. Accounts Clerk II
Geduldt, D.C. Senior Accounts Clerk I
Goodman, Mrs I.W. Chief Accounts Clerk. Creditors
Jacobs, F.H. Senior Accounts Clerk II. Salaries
GARDENS DIRECTORATE— ADMIN STAFE (GDIR)
PRETORIA
Willis, C.K. M.Sc. (Cons. Biol.) — Director: Gardens and Horticultural Services
CAPE TOWN
Le Roux, PH. Deputy Director: Garden. Curator: Kirstenbosch NBG
Winter, J.H.S. N.Dip.(Hort.). Deputy Director: Horticultural Services
Woodward, Ms Y.J. Senior Administration Clerk III. Secretary
Behr, Ms C.M. Curator: Harold Porter NBG Mogale, A.O. Curator: Free State NBG
Britz, R.M. Curator: Fowveld NBG Oliver, I.B. Curator: Karoo NBG
Turner, Ms S.F. Curator: Witwatersrand NBG Tarr, B.B. Curator: Natal NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. Curator: Pretoria NBG
PFANNING, MAINTENANCE & DEVEEOPMENT— CAPE TOWN (BPMD)
Linde, D.C. N.T.C.III(Technician and Inspector of Works). M.S.A.I.D. Cert. Estate Agency.
Control Inspector of Works
Arendse, D.S. Artisan’s Assistant II. Building maintenance
Manasse, S.P. Dip. (Masonry). Foreman. Building maintenance
Peck, W.I. Artisan’s Assistant II. Building maintenance
Koyana, Ms Z. Senior Accounts Clerk I. Salaries
Mcontsi, Ms N. Accounts Clerk II. Finance
Mirkin, Ms Y.A. Senior Secretary II
Paulse, Mrs D.W.S. Senior Accounts Clerk III
September, Ms M. Senior Accounts Clerk I. Debtors
Yeomen, Mrs I.N. Senior Accounts Clerk III. Creditors
(contract worker)
HAROLD PORTER NBG— BETTY’S BAY (GHPG)
Behr, Ms C.M. B. Sc. (Hons). Control Technician
Arendse, Ms M. Groundsman II. Gate Jacobs, L.H. Groundsman II. Plant sales
Bezuidenhout, Mrs H.M. Senior Administration Clerk III October, Ms R.P. Groundsman II. Plant records
Forrester, Ms J.A. N.T.C.IIKHort.). Chief Technician. Hor- Samuels, Ms D.C. Cleaner II
ticulture Van Wyk, A.B. Groundsman I. Index nursery
Harper, C.C. Driver
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
KAROO NBG— WORCESTER (GKAR)
Oliver, I.B. N.Dip.(Hort.)(PRA). Control Technician
249
Ashworth, Mrs E.H. Senior Administration Clerk III Viljoen, D.M. N.Dip.tHort.). Chief Technician. Collec-
Mpeke, Ms E.N. Cleaner II tions
Sibozo, N.E. Driver II. Plant sales Voigt, W.E. N.Dip.(Hort.) Technician
KIRSTENBOSCH NBG— CAPE TOWN (GKBC)
Le Roux, PH. N.Dip.(Hort.), N. Dip. (Parks & Recr.). Deputy Director; Garden. Curator.
Head; Agricultural Support Services
Goldschmidt. S.M. B.A.(Soc.)(Hons.). Assistant Director. Personnel Management
Morkel, A.T. N. Dip. (Nat. Cons.). Control Technician. Estate Manager
Hitchcock. A.N. N.H.Dip.(Hort.). Control Technician. Supervisor; Nursery
Jaques, R.F. Chief Technician. New plant introductions
Notten, Ms A.L. B.Sc., N.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Technician. Supervisor; Seed room
Trautman, C.E. Artisan. Supervisor; Workshop
Adams, TD. N.Dip.(Hort.). Technician. Greenhouse Supervisor
Arends, Ms S.J. Administration Clerk. Plant records
Duncan, G.D. N.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Technician. Bulbs
Engelbrecht, F. Storeman II
Engelbrecht, Mrs L.D. Technician. Plant records
Grace, T. Senior Storeman III
Jamieson, Mrs H.G. N. Dip. (Parks & Rec.). Chief Tech-
nician. Restio/Asparagus (part time)
Jodamus, Ms N.L. N.Dip.(Hort.). Senior Technician; An-
nuals
Kamalie, Ms S. Typist II. Receptionist
Lawrence, E. N.Dip.(Hort.). Senior Technician; Dell &
Ericas
Lewis, N.I. Engraver II. Senior Information Officer
Manuel, I.P. Senior General Foreman. Seed room
Mathys, Mrs S.S.B. Senior Accounts Clerk III. Gates
Picane, Ms S. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Tissue Culture
Prins, F.B. Security Officer III
Rudolph, A. Security Officer III
Shaide, Ms A.C. Principal Communications Officer.
Outreach Programme
Smith, Mrs A. Senior Administration Clerk I
Solomons, T.C. Senior Security Officer I
Mbambezeli. N.G. N.Dip.(Hort). Technician. Trees & shmbs
Van der Walt, Mrs L.E. N.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Technician.
Herbaceous collections (part time)
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. M.Sc., N.Dip.(Hort.). Control Techni-
cian. Succulents
Viljoen, Ms C.C. N.Dip.(Hort.). Senior Technician. Plant
production
Williams, G.C. Senior Accounts Clerk I
LOW VELD NBG— NELSPRUIT (GLOW)
Britz, R.M. N. Dip. (Forestry). Control Technican
Froneman, W.C.F. N. Dip. (Nature Cons. & Man.),
N. Dip. (Parks & Rec. Admin.), N.T.C.IIKHort.).
Control Technician. Horticulture
Hurter, P.J.H. B.Sc. (Hons). Control Technician. Research
Maqungo, Ms V.L.B. Senior Accounts Clerk I. Kiosk
Mathebula, Ms N.R. Accounts Clerk II. Kiosk
Ngwenya, PS. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Kiosk
Sibanyoni, Ms S.M. Administration Aid I. Cleaner
Van der Walt, Mrs G.A.M. Senior Administration Clerk
III
NATAL NBG— PIETERMARITZBURG (GNAT)
Tarr, B.B. N. Dip. (Parks & Rec. Admin.), Advanced Dip. (Adult Educ.). Control Technician
Johnson, Ms I. B.Sc. Senior Technician Van der Merwe, Mrs M.E.H. Senior Administration Clerk
Nonjinge, S.H.B. N.T.C.IIKHort.). Chief Technician III
Sibiya, Ms C.P.T. Administration Aid I. Cleaner
FREE STATE NBG— BLOEMFONTEIN (GFSG)
Mogale, A.O. N.Dip.(Hort.). Control Technician
Eysele, Mrs J.P. Senior Administration Clerk III
Harris, Ms S. N.Dip.(Hort.). Technician
Lumley, M.J. Chief Scientific Officer. Nursery
Raditlhare, Mrs E.M. Administration Aid II
Thaele, Mrs M.E. Administration Aid II
250
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
PRETORIA NBG (GPTA)
Heilgendorff, J.P. H.N.Dip.(Hort.). Control Technician
Baloyi, K.J. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer II. Garden
records
Baloyi, M.S. Dip.(EBM), Dip.(PTM), Dip.(Payroll Admin.).
Senior Administration Clerk I. Personnel records
Creighton, Ms D.D. Administration Clerk III
Eyssell, Ms A. B.Sc.(Hons)(Agric.). Senior Technician.
Production and sales nursery
Keyter, B.A. Senior Security Officer I
Klapwijk, N.A. N.Dip.(Hort.), N. Dip. (Plant Prod.),
N. Dip. (Diesel Fitting). Control Technician. Plan-
ning and development. Index nursery. New Plant
Company
Law, C. N.Dip.(Hort.). Senior Technician
Mariri, Ms M.A. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Matshika, S.P Groundsman II. Cook
Modisha, M.D. Groundsman II. Cleaner
Swartz, Ms P.P. M.Sc. Chief Horticulturist. Scientific
and horticultural curation of living collections of
succulents, orchids, medicinal and rare and endan-
gered plants; garden planning and development;
Madagascan plants; tour groups and visitors
Venter, W.A. N.T.C.II. Senior General Foreman. Main-
tenance
WITWATERSRAND NBG— ROODEPOORT (GWIT)
Turner, Ms S.L. B. Sc. (Hons), N.Dip.(Hort.). Control Technician
Aubrey, Mrs A.E. B.Tech.(Hort.). Senior Horticulturist.
Plant records, interpretation, information
Hankey, A.I. N.Dip.(Hort.). Specialist Horticulturist. Gar-
den, estate, collections, nursery
Head, Mrs S.E. Dip. (Typing). Administration Officer
Manjati, Mrs N.L. Senior Administration Clerk I
Mmola, Mrs B.E. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Mutshinyalo, T.T. N.Dip.(Hort.) Horticulturist. Nursery,
garden
Ndzondo, Mrs P.G. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Tebeile, Ms Z.M. Senior Administration Clerk I. Recep-
tionist
RESEARCH DIRECTORATE (RDIR)
PRETORIA
Smith, Prof G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Director: Research
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Deputy Director: Ecology and Conservation (Cape Town)
Wolfson, Mrs M.M. Ph.D. Deputy Director: Education and Research Support
Klopper, Ms R. M.Sc. Technician (contract worker) worker)
Marais, Mrs A.C. Senior Secretary IV Steyn, Dr E.M.A. D.Sc. Principal Scientist. Embryology,
Meyer, Mrs N.L. B. Sc. (Hons) Technician (contract anatomy, taxonomy
PLANT SYSTEMATICS SUBDIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Smith, Prof. G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Systematics of succulents and rosulate, petaloid monocots
Arnold, T.H. Head: Data Management (Pretoria)
Crouch, N.R. Head: Ethnobotany Unit (Durban)
Koekemoer, Miss M. Curator: National Herbarium (Pretoria)
Leistner, O.A. D.Sc. F.L.S. Scientist (contract worker)
Rourke, Dr J.P. Curator: Compton Herbarium (Cape Town)
Siebert, S.J. Regional Project Co-ordinator: SABONET (Pretoria)
Williams, Ms R. Curator: Natal Herbarium (Durban)
COMPTON HERBARIUM— CAPE TOWN (RHEC)
Rourke, J.P. Ph.D., F.M.L.S., F.R.S.S.Af Assistant Director. Systematics of
southern African Proteaceae, Stilbaceae
Baatjes, Ms A. Data Capturer (SABONET contract wor- Curator: Collections. Taxonomy of the Gnidieae
ker) (Thymelaeaceae)
Beyers, Mrs J.B.P. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Assistant Chesselet, Ms P.C.M. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
251
Conrad. Ms C. M.Sc. Scientist. Molecular systematics
laboratory (SABONET contract worker)
Cupido, C.N. M.Sc. (Hons). Chief Scientific Officer
Cupido, Mrs C.S. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Tech-
nical Assistant
Engelbrecht, Ms M. (SABONET contract worker)
Foster, Mrs S.E. Senior Secretary IV
Kurzweil, H. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
southern African terrestrial orchids
Leith, Mrs J. Senior Administration Clerk III
Manning, J.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Iridaceae and Orchidaceae; anatomy
Marinus, Ms E.D.A. Principal Auxiliary Services Offi-
cer. Herbarium Assistant
Oliver, E.G.H. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Taxonomy of
the Ericoideae (Ericaceae)
Oliver, Mrs I.M. (contract worker)
Parker, Ms F. B. Sc. (Hons). (SABONET contract worker)
Paterson-Jones, Mrs D.A. (nee Snijman) Ph.D. Principal
Scientist. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae; cladistics
Reeves, Ms G. Ph.D. Molecular systematics (contract
worker)
Roux, J.P. N.T.C.IIKHort.), F.L.S., Ph.D. Principal
Scientist. Systematics of Pteridophyta
Williams, Mrs V.J. Data Capturer (SABONET contract
worker)
NATAL HERBARIUM— DURBAN (RHED)
Williams, Ms R. B. Sc. (Hons), H.D.E. Chief Scientific Officer
Govender, D. M.Sc. Student
Govender, Mrs N. B. Sc. (Hons) Chironia systematics
(SABONET contract worker)
Hlongwane, Mrs N.C. Administration Aid II. Cleaner &
messenger
Ngwenya, A.M. Senior Scientific Officer. Herbarium As-
sistant. Plant identification and information, Zulu
Plant Names Project
Mazibuko, J.V.G. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Herba-
rium Assistant
Noble, Mrs H-E. Senior Administration Clerk III
Ntuli, Mrs N. Data Capturer (SABONET contract worker)
Singh, Ms Y. M.Sc., H.E.D. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy
of Araceae, Hypoxis
ETHNOBOTANY UNIT— DURBAN (RETH)
Crouch, N.R. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Ethnobotany of southern African flora
NATIONAL HERBARIUM— PRETORIA (RHEN)
Koekemoer, Miss M. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Herbarium management.
Taxonomy of Poaceae, Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Assistant Curator: Public relations.
Taxonomy of Vitex, Phylica, Rhamnaceae, Sterculiaceae and other related families.
Herman, P.P.J. M.Sc. Principal Scientist.
Asteraceae, Flora of Transvaal
Anderson, H.M. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Anderson, J.M. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Archer, R.H. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of main-
ly Celastraceae, Euphorbiaceae
Archer Mrs C. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of
Cyperaceae, Restionaceae, Orchidaceae
Burgoyne, Ms PM. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Mesembry-
anthemaceae
Cloete, Mrs M. Dip. (Typing). Senior Provisioning Clerk
III. Specimen label typist
Fish, Mrs L. B.Sc. Principal Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Poaceae. Plant collecting programme; super-
vising mounters
Gavhi, M.P. N.Dip.(Hort.) Kew Millennium Seedbank
Project (contract worker)
Glen, H.F. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Taxonomy of trees,
herbarium for cultivated plants, and botanical col-
lectors
Glen, Mrs R.P. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
of ferns, water plants
Assistant Curator: Personnel. Taxonomy of
Jordaan, Mrs M. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Casuarinaceae-Connaraceae, Maytemis
Kgaditsi, W.T. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer.
Mounter, general assistant in cultivated plants sec-
tion
Makgakga, M.C. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer. Her-
barium assistant. Wing B
Makgakga, K.S. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer.
Mounter of vascular plants
Makwarela, A.M. B.Sc. (Hons). Senior Scientific Officer.
Wing B
Masombuka, Ms A.S. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer.
Herbarium assistant
Meyer, J.J. N. Dip. (Teaching). Senior Scientific Officer.
WingC
Mmakola, E.K. Data Capturer (SABONET contract work-
er)
Moeng, E.T. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Wing A
Mothogoane, M.S. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer.
Herbarium Assistant
Naicker, K. Sales & Marketing Management Certificate.
Senior Administration Clerk II
252
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
Netnoii, Ms N.C. H.E.D.. B. Sc. (Hons). Scientific Offi-
cer. Wing D
Nkoana, L.S. B. Sc. (Hons). Senior Scientific Officer.
SABONET project
Nkoane, Ms G.K. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Her-
barium Assistant. Parcelling, pressing, general as-
sistance
Nkonki, Mrs T. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Wing B
Perold, Mrs S.M. Ph.D. Taxonomy of Hepaticae (con-
tract worker)
Phahla. T.J. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer. Mounter
of bryophytes and vascular plants
Ready, Mrs J.A. N.Dip.(Hort.). Principal Auxiliary
Services Officer. Herbarium assistant. Wing D
Retief, Miss E. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Pollen studies
of Boraginaceae. Taxonomy of Boraginaceae,
Verbenaceae, Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, Rubiaceae
Sebothoma, P.N. Auxiliary Services Officer II. Plant
identifications co-ordinator
Smithies, Mrs S.J. M.Sc., Dip. Ed. (Moray House). Chief
Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of Scrophulariaceae,
Selaginaceae, Lobeliaceae
Steyn, Ms C.C. Principal Auxiliary Services Officer.
Wing B
Swelankomo, Ms N. B.Sc. (SECOSUD contract worker)
Van Rooy, J. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Taxonomy and
biogeography of mosses
Van Wyk, E. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Seedbank manag-
er, Kew Millenium Seedbank Project (contract
worker)
Victor, Ms J.E. M.Sc., H.Dip.(Journ.). Chief Scientific
Officer. Taxonomy of Rutaceae, Asclepiadaceae
Welman, Miss W.G. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Taxon-
omy of Convolvulaceae, Solanaceae, Cucurbit-
aceae, Campanulaceae, Asteraceae, Acanthaceae
DATA MANAGEMENT— PRETORIA (RPDC)
Arnold, T.H. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Computer application especially in taxonomy
Botha, Mrs A.G. Principal Auxiliary Services Officer.
Secretary (part time)
De Wet, Mrs B.C. B.Sc. (Computer Science), B.A.,
H.D.L.S. Principal Datametrician
Hams, Mrs B.J. Principal Auxiliary Services Officer.
Encoding, quality control
Mbedzi, M.D. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer
Smit, G.C. Network Essentials, NT Workstation 4, NT
Server 4. Principal Network Controller
Snyman, Mrs E.E. B.Sc. N.Dip.(Comp. Data Proc.) Senior
Scientific Officer
Steyn, Ms H.M. Botanical Information Officer (contract
worker)
Van Rooyen, Mrs V.H. Principal typist I
SABONET
PRETORIA
Siebert, S.J. M.Sc. Regional Project Co-ordinator
Golding, Ms J.S. B.Sc. (Hons). Southern African Red Mossmer, Ms M. B.Sc. (Hons). Editing of publications.
Data List Co-ordinator (contract worker) website management (contract worker)
Haasbroek, Ms C.M. Einances (contract worker) Noko, Ms N.R. Administrative Officer (contract worker)
EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SUPPORT— PRETORIA (EDIR)
Wolfson, Mrs M.M. Ph.D. Deputy Director. Physiology/Ecophysiology of Poaceae, carbon uptake
metabolism, allocation in response to environmental and management stress
Adams, Ms E.M. Principal Typist I. Secretary
Liebenberg, Mrs E.J.L. Manager: Research Support Services, Publications, Registry and Finance
Potgieter, Mrs E. Principal Librarian
EDUCATION (EDIR)
GOLD FIELDS CENTRE— CAPE TOWN (EECT)
Mkefe, TX. SPTD. H.E.D. Assistant Director. Principal Communications Officer.
Co-ordinator EE programme
Cupido, Ms M. Senior Administration Clerk II. Centre co-ordinator
Charlton, Ms V.J. Secretary
Hitchcock, Mrs W.A. Principal Communications Officer. Adult education
Mgodeli, W.M. Bus driver I
Tyhokolo, Ms S.E. SPTD. Technician. Senior Communications Officer
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
253
PRETORIA
Symonds, Ms A.M. N. Dip. (Nature Cons.), H.E.D. Assistant Director. Communication
De Bruyn, Ms A.J. B.Sc. (Zoo., Bot. & Mammalogy).
Principal Communication Officer
Nkomo, Mrs A. Assistant Administration Officer (con-
tract worker)
Novellie, Mrs E. Education Officer (contract worker)
Terblanche, Ms A.J. Principal Communications Officer
WITWATERSRAND
Moore, Mrs J.M. Senior Administration Clerk I (contract worker) (part time)
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc.(Bot.). Principal Communications Officer
INTERPRETATION
Joffe. Mrs H. B.Sc. Chief Garden Utilization Officer (part time) (Pretoria)
Roff, J. Senior Administration Clerk I. Education Officer (Pietermaritzburg)
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES AND PUBLICATIONS— PRETORIA (RPUB)
Liebenberg. Mrs E.J.L. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Cytotaxonomy. Manager
Brink, Mrs S.S. Dip. (Typing). Chief Typesetter. Type-
setting, layout, word processing
Condy, Ms G.S. M.A. Chief Industrial Technician.
Botanical artist
Du Plessis, Mrs E. B.Sc. (Hons), S.E.D. Technical editor.
Editing, translating, layout
Germishuizen, G. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Editor
Ledwaba, Mrs D.M. Senior Registry Clerk I
Mapheza, TP. Senior Administration Clerk III. Book-
shop
Momberg, Mrs B.A. B.Sc. (Entomology & Zoology). Tech-
nical editor. Editing, layout (part time)
Maree, Ms D.J. H.E.D. Computer Operator.
Nkosi, P.B. Administration Clerk II. Bookstore
Pretorius, Ms M.A. Senior Administration Clerk II
Romanowski, Mrs A.J. Dip. (Photography). Chief Indus-
trial Technician (Photography). Scientific photog-
rapher
Tloubatla, J.M. Driver II
Turck, Mrs S. B.A. (Information Design). Senior Indus-
trial Technician. Graphic design
MARY GUNN LIBRARY— PRETORIA (RLBP)
Potgieter, Mrs E. B.Libr. Principal Librarian
Fourie, Mrs A. B.A., H.D.Libr.Sci. Principal Librarian (part time)
ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION SUBDIRECTORATE (RREL)
CAPE TOWN
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Deputy Director: Research
Morkel, Ms L. Senior Administration Clerk III. Personal Assistant to Deputy Director: Research
Parenzee, Ms H.A. Senior Administration Clerk III
Powrie, L.W. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Spatial modelling, databases
CLIMATE CHANGE
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Chief Specialist Scientist. Modelling, global change
Arnolds, J.L. Principal Auxiliary Services Officer. Laboratory
Kgope, B.S. M.Sc. Scientist. Plant ecophysiology
Midgley, G.F. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Ecophysiology, modelling
Motete, Ms N. Scientist
Musil, C.F. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Ecophysiology, modelling
Snyders, S.G. Senior Auxiliary Services Officer II. Greenhouse, maintenance
254
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Donaldson, J.S. Ph.D. (Zoology) Assistant Director. Supervisor: Conservation Farming. Cycad biology
Bosenberg, J.de Wet. B. Sc. (Hons) Chief Scientific Officer. Cycad biology, conservation farming
Cader, Ms L. Secretary. Protea Atlas Project (contract worker)
Ebrahim, I. Assistant. Protea Atlas Project (contract worker)
Jacobs, E.C. Senior Auxilliary Services Officer
Rebelo, AG. Ph.D. (Zoology) Principal Scientist. Protea Atlas Project
CONSERVATION EARMING PROJECT
Nanni, Ms I. B.Sc., H.E.D. Chief Scientific Officer. Project Co-ordinator
Millar, Ms D.L. Research Co-ordinator (contract worker)
DESERTIFICATION
Hoffman, M.T. Ph.D. Senior Specialist Scientist. Disturbance and historical ecology
Cloete, M.J. Fieldwork (contract worker)
Petersen, Ms A. B.Sc. (Hons). Senior Scientific Officer. Land use and vegetation mapping
HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH
Brown, N.A.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Seed research
Botha, P.A. N.H.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Scientific Officer. Seed research
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
O’Callaghan, M.G. Ph.D. Information Technology Manager. Information management and development
Evans, N. Network Controller. IT Support Officer (contract worker)
Pratt, Ms C. B.Sc. Network Controller (contract worker)
SUPPORT SERVICES
Bardien-Overmeyer, Ms S. Auxiliary Services Officer. Manager (contract worker)
Bowler, Mrs M. Administration Aid II. Cleaner. Assistant: teas and functions
De Witt, D.M. Tradesman (B-Group). Assistant: maintenance
HARRY MOLTENO LIBRARY (RRLC)
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. M. A. (Inf. Sc.), B.Proc. Dip. Datametrics. Principal Librarian, NBI Web Site Manager
Jagger, B.W. B.A. PG Dip. Lis. Senior Library Assistant II. Inter-library loans; circulation control
Ovens, Dr C.S.H. Ph.D.dnf.Sc.) Dip. Datametrics. (contract librarian)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
1 April 2000-31 March 2001
ANDERSON. H.M. 2000. Review: Die infloreszenzen.Typologie und
Slellung im aufbau des vegetation.skorpers, by F. Weberling,
1098, Bothalia 30: 123,
ANDERSON, J.M. 2000. Review: Toward.s Gondwana Alive.
Promoting biodiversity and stemming the Sixth Extinction,
edited by J.M. Anderson. 1999. PlantHfe 23: 35, 36.
ANDERSON, J.M. 2001, (ed.) Toward.s Gondwana alive Vol. I.
Promoting biodiversity and .stemming the Sixth Extinction, cdn
2. Gondwana Alive Society & National Botanical Institute,
Pretoria.
ARCHER, C. 2000a. Burmanniaceae (Liliidae-Liliales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 587.
ARCHER, C, 2000b. Cannaceae (Zingiberidae-Zingiberales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 587.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
255
ARCHER. C. 2000c. Cyperaceae (Commelinidae-Cyperales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 594-605.
ARCHER. C. 2000d. Flagellariaceae (Commelinidae-Restionales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 608.
ARCHER. C. 2000e. Musaceae (Zingiberidae-Zingiberales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 643.
ARCHER. C. 2000f. Restionaceae (Commelinidae-Restionales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 729-733.
ARCHER. C. 2000g. Strelitziaceae (Zingiberidae-Zingiberales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 734. 735.
ARCHER. C. 2000h. Zingiberaceae (Zingiberidae-Zingiberales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 739. 740.
ARCHER. C. 20001. Cyperaceae. In R Goldblatt & J.C. Manning. Cape
plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia
9: 81-92.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000a. Achariaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 45. 46.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000b. Anacardiaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 56-59.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000c. Aquifoliaceae (Asteridae-Aquifoliales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 98. 99.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000d. Balanitaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 171.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000e. Balsaminaceae (Rosidae-Geraniales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 173.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000L Burseraceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 196.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000g. Buxaceae (Dilleniidae-Buxales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 196. 197.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000h. Callitrichaceae (Asteridae-Lamiales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 199.
.ARCHER. R.H. 2000i. Cornaceae ( Asteridae-Cornales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 234.
.ARCHER. R.H. 2000j. Dichapetalaceae (Rosidae-Malpighiales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 242. 243.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000k. Dioscoreaceae (Liliidae-Dioscoreales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 605. 606.
ARCHER. R.H. 20001. Dracaenaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 606.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000m. Euphorbiaceae (Dilleniidae-Malpighiales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 249-262.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000n. Greyiaceae (Rosidae-Geraniales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 315. 316.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000o. Haemodoraceae (Liliidae-Liliales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 609.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000p. Icacinaceae (Rosidae-Icacinales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 321. 322.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000q. Kirkiaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 322. 323.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000r. Lanariaceae (Liliidae-Liliales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 640.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000s. Malpighiaceae (Rosidae-Malpighiales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 346.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000t. Meliaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 353-356.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000u. Melianthaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 356.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000v. Ochnaceae (Dilleniidae-Theales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 426. 427.
ARCHER, R.H. 2000w. Oliniaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 430.
ARCHER, R.H. 2000x. Passifloraceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 434-436.
ARCHER, R.H. 2000y. Ptaeroxylaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 461. 462.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000z. Sapindaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 503-506.
ARCHER, R.H. 2000za. Tecophilaeaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 735, 736.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000zb. Velloziaeeae (Liliidae-Liliales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 736, 737.
ARCHER. R.H. 2000zc. Abstract: Taming Euphorbia', subgeneric clas-
sification in Africa. XVIth AETEAT Congress, 28 August to 2
September 2000. Scripta Botanica Belgica 20: 9.
ARCHER. R.H. & JORDAAN, M. 2000a. Celastraceae (Rosidae-
Celastrales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 214-220.
ARCHER. R.H. & JORDAAN. M. 2000b. Celastraceae. In P. Goldblatt
& J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 404—407.
ARUMUGAM. N. 2000. News from South Africa. Chironia collecting
trips. SABONETNews 5: 69-72.
ARUMUGAM. N. & NTULI, N.R. 2000. Life at Natal Herbarium.
SABONET News 5: 15-17.
BALKWILL. K. & WELMAN, W.G. 2000. Acanthaceae (Asteridae-
Scrophulariales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 34-45.
BARTHLOTT. W. & SMITH. G.F. 2000. Obituary: Werner Rauh
( 1913-2000), one of the World's most prolific authors on suc-
culent plants. Bothaiia 30: 223, 224.
BEYERS. J.B.P. 2000a. Lacimaea (Thymelaeaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspeetus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 680-683.
BEYERS. J.B.P. 2000b Struthiola (Thymelaeaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 684, 685.
BINGHAM, M., GOLDING, J„ LUWIIKA. B.. NGUVULU, C„
SMITH. P. & SICHIMA. G. 2000. Red Data List: spotlight on
Zambia. SABONETNews 5: 93-95.
BOSENBERG, D. 2000. Save our species. The Albany cycad. Africa —
Environment & Wildlife 8: 26. 27.
BOTHA. C.J., SCHULTZ, R.A., VAN DER LUGT, J.J. & ARCHER.
C. 2000. A krimpsiekte-like syndrome in small stock poisoned
by Ornithogahim toxicarium Archer & Archer. Journal of the
South African Veterinary Association 71: 6-9.
BOTHA, D.J., WILLIS, C.K.' & WINTER. J.H.S. 2000. Southern
African botanical gardens needs assessment. SABONET Re-
port No. 1 1 .
BOWIE. M.R., WAND, S.J.E. & ESLER, K.J. 2000. Seasonal gas
exchange responses under three different temperature treat-
ments in a leaf-succulent and a drought-deciduous shrub from
the Succulent Karoo. South African Journal of Botany 66:
118-123.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000a. Araliaceae (Rosidae-Apiales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 99, 100.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000b. Begoniaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 174.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000c. Bombacaceae (Dilleniidae-Malvales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 178.
256
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000d. Canellaceae (Magnoliidae-Magnoliales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Slrelitzia 10: 202, 203.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000e. Clusiaceae (Guttiferae) (Dilleniidae-
Guttiferales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 221 .
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000L Combretaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 228, 229.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000g. Ebenaceae (Dilleniidae-Theales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 245.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000h. Elatinaceae (Dilleniidae-Guttiferales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 246.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 20001. Erythroxylaceae (Rosidae-Linales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 248.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000j. Flacourtiaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 304-307.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000k. Frankeniaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 307, 308.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 20001. Geissolomataceae (Rosidae-Celastrales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 309.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000m. Gunneraceae (Rosidae-Haloragidales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 317.
BREDENKAMP, C.L, 2000n. Haloragaceae (Rosidae-Haloragidales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 317, 318.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000o. Lecythidaceae (Dilleniidae-Lecythidales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 336.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000p, Linaceae (Rosidae-Linales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 337, 338.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 20()0q. Loasaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 338, 339.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000r. Lythraceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 344-346.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000s. Melastomataceae (Rosidae-Myrtales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 352, 353,
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000t. Menyanthaceae (Asteridae-Asterales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 359, 360.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 20()0u. Onagraceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 1 0: 430, 43 1 .
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 20()0v. Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). In P.
Goldblatt & ,I.C, Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the
Cape flora of South Africa, Strelitzia 9: 683, 684.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000w. Penaeaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 440-442.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 20()0x. Plumbaginaceae (Caryophyllidae-
Plumbaginales), In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 447, 448.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000y. Polygalaceae (Rosidae-Polygalales). In
O.A, Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 1 0: 449^5 1 .
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2()0()z, Rhamnaceae (Rosidae-Rhamnales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 465-467.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 20()0za, Rhizophoraceae (Rosidae-Rhizo-
phorales). In O.A, Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 468, 469.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000zb. Sapotaceae (Dilleniidac-Sapotales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 506-508.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000ze. Stcrcidiaecae (Dilicniidae-Malvales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants ol southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 539-541.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000zd. Tamaricaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 544,
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000ze. Tiliaceae (Dilleniidae-Mal vales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 547, 548.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000zf. Trapaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 548.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000zg. Turneraceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 548-550.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000zh. Violaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 559, 560.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & ARCHER, R.H. 2000. Rhynchocalycaceae
(Rosidae-Myrtales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 469.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & BEYERS, J.B.P. 2000. Thymelaeaceae
(Dilleniidae-Euphorbiales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 544—546.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000. The epidermis in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic
significance. Bothalia 30: 69-86.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VICTOR. J.E. 2000. Gentianaceae (Asteri-
dae-Gentianales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 310-312.
BROWN, N.A.C. 2000. Consultation and photographs in Appendix 1:
smoke and seed germination. In A. Stewart, Let's propagate! A
plant propagation manual for Australia. Australian Broad-
casting Corporation, Sydney.
BROWN, N.A.C. & PROSCH, D. 2000. Storage and germination of
Clivia miniata seeds. Clivia Yearbook 2: 59-62.
BURGOYNE, PM. 2000a. The enigmatic family Mesembryan-
themaceae. Notes on identifying mesembs (vygies). Plantlife
23: 5-8.
BURGOYNE, PM. 2000b. Will the real Ruschianthemum gigas please
stand up! Aloe 37: 8.
BURGOYNE, PM. 2000c. Abstract of poster: Systematics of Acrodon
(Mesembryanthe-maceae): what defines a genus? XVIth AET-
FAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000. Scripta
Botanica Belgica 20: 10.
BURGOYNE, P.M., BREDENKAMP, G.J. & VAN ROOYEN, N.
2000. Wetland vegetation in the North-eastern Sandy Highveld,
Mpumalanga, South Africa. Bothalia 30: 187-200.
BURGOYNE, PM. & HENDERSON, L. 2000. Red-flowering tea-tree
invasion. Veld & Flora 86: 159.
BURGOYNE, P.M., KRYNAUW, S. & SMITH, G.F. 2000a. Frithia—
up close and personal. Aloe 37: 38^2.
BURGOYNE, P.M., KRYNAUW, S. & SMITH, G.F. 2000b. Abstract
of poster: Population studies and new conservation status for
species of the genus Frithia (Mesembryanthemaceae). XVIth
AETFAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2()()(). Scripta
Botanica Belgica 20: 16.
BURGOYNE, P.M., SMITH, G.F. & DU PLESSIS, F 2()00. Notes on
the genus Frithia (Mesembryanthemaceae) and the description
of a new species, F. humilis. in South Africa, Bothalia 30: 1-7.
CHESSELET, P„ SMITH, G.F, BURGOYNE, P.M., KLAK, C.,
HAMMER, S.A., HARTMANN, H.E.K., KURZWEIL, H.,
VAN .lAARSVELD, E.J., VAN WYK, B-E. & LEISTNER,
O.A. 2000. Mesembryanthemaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryo-
phyllales). In O.A, Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 360—410.
CHESSELET, P, SMITH, G.F, & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000a, Systematic
and evolutionary significance of morphology in the
Mesembryanthemaceae: interactive database and illustrated
atlas for identification. Aloe 37: 46-51.
CHESSELET, P, SMITH, G.F, & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000b. The habit
and peculiar inflorescence of Ottosonderia inonticola (Sond.)
L. Bolus, Mesembryanthemaceae. Aloe 37: 88. 89.
CONDY. G. 2000. Obituary: Rosemary Holcroft ( l942-2()00).
SABONEl'News 5: 46, 47.
CROUCH, N.R. 2()0()a. Preservation-tbrough-propagation: the role of
horticulture in delivering conservation products in southern
Africa. Southern African Ethnohotany 1,3: 14—22.
CROUCH. N.R. 2000b. Review: People’s piants, by B-E. van Wyk &
N. Gcricke. 2()()(). SABONET News 5: 57, 58.
CROUCH, N. 2001, Elliot Ndlovu: healer with a vision. Pahnnut Post
4. 1 : 4-6.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
257
CROUCH. N.R., DONALDSON. J., SMITH. G.F., SYMMONDS, R.
DALZIEL. C.G.M. & SCOTT-SHAW. C.R. 2000. Ex situ con-
servation of Stangeria eriopus (Stangeriaceae) at the Durban
Botanic Gardens. South Africa. Encephalartos 63: 16-24.
CROUCH. N.R. & SMITH. G.F. 2000. Weeds in the breach. Did sub-
stitution resolve a historical over-harvesting issue? Plantlife 23:
25. 26.
CROUCH. N.R., SMITH. G.F. & SMITH. M.T. 2000. Aptenia cordifo-
lia (L. f.) Schwantes (Mesembryanthemaceae) in Zulu tradi-
tional medicine — an overview. Haseltonia 7: 30-36.
CROUCH. N.R.. SMITH. G.F., SYMMONDS. R. & TOMALIN. M.
2000. Gasteria croiicheh — the magical impundu of the Zulu.
British Cactus & Succulent Journal 18: 70-78.
CROUCH. N.R. & SYMMONDS. R. 2000. Localising the ‘Inanda’
provenance of John Medley Wood. SABONET News 5: 97-100.
DE WINTER. B. & GERMISHUIZEN. G. 2000. Obituary: Leslie
Edward Wostall Codd ( 1908-1999). Bothalia 30: 111-115.
DREYER. L.L. & GLEN. R.R 2000. Nymphaeaceae (Magno-
liidae-Nymphaeales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 426.
DREYER, L.L. & JORDAAN. M. 2000a. Aizoaceae (Caryo-
phyllidae-Caryophyllales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 46—49.
DREYER. L.L. & JORDAAN. M. 2000b. Brassicaceae (Dille-
niidae-Capparales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 184—191.
DREYER, L.L. & JORDAAN, M. 2000c. Capparaceae (Dille-
niidae-Capparales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 204—206.
DREYER, L.L. & JORDAAN, M. 2000d. Droseraceae (Dille-
niidae-Nepenthales). In O.A, Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 244, 245.
DREYER. L.L. & JORDAAN, M. 2000e. Gisekiaceae (Caryo-
phyllidae-Caryophy Hales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 314. 315.
DREYER, L.L. & JORDAAN. M. 2000L Molluginaceae (Caryo-
phyllidae-Caryophyllales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 410— J13.
DREYER. L.L. & JORDAAN. M. 2000g. Ranunculaceae (Mag-
noliidae-Ranunculales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of south-
ern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 463. 464.
DREYER. L.L. & MAKWARELA. A.M. 2000a. Crassulaceae
(Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 235, 236.
DREYER. L.L. & MAKWARELA. A.M. 2000b. Geraniaceae
(Dilleniidae-Malvales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of south-
ern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 312-314.
DREYER. L.L, & MAKWARELA, A.M. 2000c. Oxalidaceae
(Rosidae-Geraniales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 432. 433.
DUNCAN. G. 2000a. Eulophia horsfallii at Kirstenbosch. Veld &
Flora 86: 16-18.
DUNCAN. G. 2000b. Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 99-103.
EDWARDS. T.J., PATON. A. & CROUCH, N.R. 2000. A new species
of Plectranthiis (Lamiaceae) from Zimbabwe. Kew Bulletin 55:
459-464.
EEN. G. & PEROLD. S.M. 2000. In memory of S.W. Arnell.
Hepaticologist ( 1895-1970). Bothalia 30: 218-220.
FISH. L. 2000a. Commelinaceae (Commelindae-Commelinales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 591-593.
FISH. L. 2000b. Poaceae (Gramineae) (Commelindae-Cyperales/
Poales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: fami-
lies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 659-726.
GERMISHUIZEN. G. 2000a. Eabaceae (Leguminosae) (Rosidae-
Fabales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: fam-
ilies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 262-303.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 2000b. Loranthaceae (Rosidae-Santalales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 340-344.
GERMISHUIZEN. G. 2000c. Polygonaceae (Caryophyllidae-Poly-
gonales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: fam-
ilies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 451^53.
GERMISHUIZEN. G. 2000d. Viscaceae (Rosidae-Santalales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 560. 561.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 2000e, Review: Field guide to the acacias of
Zimbabwe, by J. Timberlake, C. Fagg & R. Barnes, 1999.
Bothalia 30: 123, 124.
GERMISHUIZEN. G. 2000f. Review: A field guide to wild flowers of
KwaZulu-Natal and the eastern region, by Elsa Pooley, 1998.
Dendron 34: 44, 45.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 20()0g. The mistletoes. Dendron 34: 21.
GERMISHUIZEN. G. 20()0h. Abstract of poster: Publications of the
National Botanical Institute, South Africa. XVIth AETFAT
Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000, Scripta Botanica
Belgica 20: 35.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & DU PLESSIS. E. 2000. New releases from
the National Botanical Institute. SABONET News 5: 115, 116.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & SCHUTTE, A.L. 2000. Rhynchosia
(Fabaceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. Acon-
spectus of the Cape flora of South Africa, Strelitzia 9: 509, 510.
GLEN. H.F. 2000a. Arecaceae (Palmae) ( Arecidae-Arecales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 580-582.
GLEN, H.F. 2000b. Cactaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophyllales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strc/itz/u 10: 197-199,
GLEN, H.F. 2000c. Cupressaceae (Pinopsida). In O.A. Leistner, Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 29,
30.
GLEN, H.F. 2000d. Pinaceae (Pinopsida). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants
of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 30.
GLEN, H.F. 2000e. Podocarpaceae (Pinopsida). In O.A. Leistner, Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 30,
31.
GLEN. H.F. 2000L Stangeriaceae (Cycadopsida). In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera, Strelitzia
10: 31.
GLEN, H.F. 2000g. Taxodiaceae (Pinopsida). In O.A. Leistner. Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 31,
32.
GLEN, H.F. 2000h. Welwitschiaceae (Gnetopsida). In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 32.
GLEN, H.F. 2000i. Zamiaceae (Cycadopsida). In O.A. Leistner, Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 32,
33.
GLEN, H.F. 2000j. Primulaceae (Dilleniidae-Primulales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 456, 457.
GLEN, H.F. 2000k. Review: Rare and threatened plants of KwaZulu-
Natal and neighbouring regions, by Rob Scott-Shaw, 1999.
Bothalia 30: 225.
GLEN, H.F. 20001. Review: Taxonomy of cultivated plants, edited by
S. Andrews, A. Leslie & C. Alexander, 1999. Bothalia 30: 225,
226.
GLEN. H.F. 2000m. Some notes on making keys that work (at least in
theory). SABONET News 5: 40—46.
GLEN, H.F. 2000n. Review: SAPPl tree spotting, Bushveld. SABO-
NET News 5: 112-114.
GLEN, H.F. 2000o. The state of horticultural taxonomy in South
Africa. In S, Andrews, A. C. Leslie & C, Alexander. Taxonomy of
cultivated plants: 469, 470. Third International Symposium,
Edinburgh, 20-26 July 1989. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.
GLEN. H.F. & GOLDING, J. 2000. Looking for a new research pro-
ject? SABONET News 5: 38, 39.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 2000. Aloaceae (First Part): Aloe. Flora
of southern Africa 5,1,1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
GLEN. H.F., MOSSMER. M. & WILLIS. C. 2000. The paper chase.
SABONET News 5: 107-112.
GLEN. H.F. & PEROLD, S.M. 2000. Obituary: Otto Heinrich Volk
(1903-2000). Bothalia 30: 215-218.
GLEN, H.F. & VICTOR, J.E. 2000. Myrtaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 420-422.
GLEN. H E, WEISSER. P.J. & HARDY, D.S. 2001. Miri yapo ya
Venda/lndigenous trees of Venda. University of Venda. Thoho-
yandou.
GLEN. H.F.. WILLIS. C. & GOLDING, J. 2000. The paper chase.
SABONET News 5 : 51-56.
GLEN, R.P. 2000a. Alismataceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 567, 568.
258
Bothalia 31,2 (2001 )
GLEN. R.P. 2000b. Aponogetonaceae (Alismatidae-Najadales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 577, 578.
GLEN, R.P. 2000c. Cabombaceae (Magnoliidae-Nymphaeales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 197.
GLEN, R.P. 2000d. Ceratophyllaceae (Magnoliidae-Ceratophyllales).
In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 220, 221.
GLEN, R.P. 2000e, Cymodoceaceae (Alismatidae-Najadales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 593. 594.
GLEN, R.P. 2000L Eriocaulaceae (Commelinidae-Eriocaulales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 607.
GLEN, R.P. 2000g. Hydrocharitaceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales), In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 619-621.
GLEN, R.P. 2000h. Hydrostachyaceae (Asteridae-Callitrichales), In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 321.
GLEN. R.P. 2000i. Juncaceae (Commelinidae-Juncales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 639.
GLEN. R.P. 2000J. Juncaginaceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 639. 640.
GLEN. R.P. 2000k. Lemnaceae (Arecidae-Arales). In O.A. Leistner.
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 640, 641.
GLEN. R.P. 20001. Limnocharitaceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 642.
GLEN, R.P. 2000m. Najadaceae (Alismatidae-Najadales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 644.
GLEN, R.P. 2000n. Podostemaceae (Rosidae-Podostemales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 448. 449.
GLEN, R.P. 2000o. Pontederiaceae (Liliidae-Haemodorales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 726-728.
GLEN. R.P. 2000p. Potamogetonaceae (Alismatidae-Najadales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 728.
GLEN, R.P. 2000q. Prioniaceae (Commelinidae-Juncales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 728, 729.
GLEN, R.P. 2000r. Ruppiaceae (Alismatidae-Najadales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 733, 734.
GLEN. R.P. 2000s, Typhaceae (Commelinidae-Typhales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 736.
GLEN, R.P. 2000t. Xyridaceae (Commelinidae-Commelinales), in
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 737.
GLEN. R.P. 2000u. Zannichelliaceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 738, 739.
GLEN. R.P. 2000v. Zosteraceae (Alismatidae-Alismatales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 740.
GLEN, R.P. 2000w. Review: Aquatic and wetland plants of India, by
C.D.K. Cook, 1996. Bothalia 30: 124.
GOLDBLATT, P. BERNHARDT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000.
Adaptive radiation of pollination mechanisms in Ixia
(Iridaceae: Crocoideae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 87: 564-577.
GOLDBLATT, P, & MANNING, J.C, 2000a. Cape plants. A conspec-
tus of the Cape tlora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National
Botanical Institute and Missouri Botanical Garden.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C, 2000b. Iridaceae (Liliidae-
Asparagales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 623-638.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2()()0c. New species of Moraea
(Iridaceae-lridoideae) from southern Africa. Novon 10: 14—21.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 200()d. Wildflowers of the fairest
Cape. Red Roof Design, Cape Town.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000e. The long-proboscid fly
pollination system in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 87: 146-170.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2001. Bobbejaantjies. Veld &
Flora 87: 12-15.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C, & BERNHARDT. P. 2000.
Adaptive radiation of pollination mechanisms in Sparaxis
(Iridaceae: Ixioideae). Adansonia 22: 57-70.
GOLDBLATT, P. MANNING. J.C. & BEYERS, J.B.P. 2000a.
Arctotheca ( Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape
plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa, Strelitzia
9: 303.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & BEYERS, J.B.P. 2000b. Arctotis
(Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A
conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9:
303-306.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & BEYERS, J.B.P. 2000c.
Eriocephalus (Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 319, 320.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & BEYERS, J.B.P. 2000d.
Haplocarphu. In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A
conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 329.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & HERMAN. P.P.J. 2000.
Gymnostephium (Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 328. 329.
GOLDBLATT. P, MANNING, J.C. & HILLIARD. O.M. 2000. Selago
(Scrophulariaceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants,
A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9:
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING. J.C. & KOEKEMOER. M. 2000a.
Amphiglossa (Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 301, 302.
GOLDBLATT, P. MANNING, J.C. & KOEKEMOER, M. 2000b.
Stoehe (Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape
plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia
9: 364, 365.
GOLDBLATT, P. MANNING. J.C. & KOEKEMOER. M. 2000c.
Elytropappus (Asteraceae). In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape tlora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 319.
GOLDBLATT, P. MANNING. J.C. & LINDER, H.P 2000. Poaceae.
In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of
the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 174-199.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & SNIJMAN, D.A, 2000.
Hyacinthaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A
conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9:
93-99.
GOLDING. J. 2000a. Dealing with DDs: uncertainties and deficiencies
in Red Listing. SABONET News 5: 28-31.
GOLDING, J. 2000b. lUCN. The Second World Conservation
Congress. SABONET News 5: 191-193.
GOLDING. J. 2000c. Review: 2000 lUCN Red List of threatened
species, by C. Hilton-Taylor, 2000. SABONET News 5: 205.
GOLDING, J. 2()00d. Picking up the pieces: Red Data Lists in south-
ern Africa. Bothalia 30: 213. 214,
GOLDING, J. 2000e. Southern African Plant Red Data List Workshop.
SABONET News 5: 23, 24.
GOLDING, J. & IZIDINE. S. 2000. What? No Red Data List for
Mozambique! P/onr/j/c 23: 15, 16.
GOLDING, J„ KOBISI, K., MAY, E.D., MOLISE, M„ SEPAMO, K„
TALUKDAR. S. & THEKO, B. 2000. Red Data List: spotlight
on Lesotho. SABONET News 5: 96. 97.
HARDING. W.R.. PEROLD, S.M. & GLEN, R.P. 2000. New records
from an ephemeral pan, Blouviei, in Western Cape, South
Africa (Hepaticae and Zannichelliaceae). Bothalia 30:
157-159.
HERMAN, P.P.J. 2000a. Die familie Asteraceae: 'n algemene oorsig.
Suid Afrikaanse Tvdskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologle
19: 66, 67.
HERMAN, P.P.J. 2000b. Die plantfamilie Asteraceae: 2. Die blomme.
Suid Afrikaanse Tyd.skrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie
19:118-121.
HERMANN, P.P.J. 2001 . Observations on hairs in the capitula of some
southern African Asteraceae genera. South African Journal of
Botany 67: 65-68.
HERMAN, P.P.J., RETIEF, E„ KOEKEMOER, M. & WELMAN,
W.G. 2000. Asteraceae (Compositae) (Asteridae-Astcrales). In
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
259
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 101-170.
HIGGINS, S.I., BOND, W.J. & TROLLOPE, W.S.W. 2000. Fire,
resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass-tree coexistence
in savanna. Journal of Ecology 88: 213-229.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2000. Living plant collections. Kirstenbosch
National Botanical Garden. SABONET News 5: 173-181.
HOARE. D.B.. VICTOR. J.E., LUBKE. R.A. & MUCINA, L, 2000.
Vegetation of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands south of
George, South Africa. Bothalia 30: 87-96.
HONIG. M. 2000. Making your garden come alive! Environmental
interpretation in botanical gardens. SABONET Report No. 9.
National Botanical Institute. Pretoria.
JOFFE. P. 2000. Keep the Lowveld green! Environmental Resource
Guide: Greening SA 7. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
JORDAAN. M. 2000a. Amaranthaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophy-
llales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: fami-
lies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 49-56.
JORDAAN, M. 2000b. Annonaceae (Magnoliidae-Magnoliales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 59-62.
JORDAAN. M. 2000c. Aristolochiaceae (Magnoliidae-Aristolochi-
ales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10: 100. 101.
JORDAAN, M. 2000d. Balanophoraceae (Rosidae-Santalales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Srre/;r;/a 10: 172.
JORDAAN. M. 2000e. Basellaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophyllales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 173, 174.
JORDAAN. M. 2000L Cannabaceae (Dilleniidae-Urticales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 203.
JORDAAN. M. 2000g. Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryo-
phyllales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 206-213.
JORDAAN. M. 2000h. Casuarinaceae (Hamamelidae-Casuarinales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 213.
JORDAAN. M. 2000i. Chenopodiaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryo-
phyllales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 221-226.
JORDAAN, M. 2000j. Connaraceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 229. 230.
JORDAAN. M. 2000k. Cunoniaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa; families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 241. 242.
JORDAAN. M. 20001. Escalloniaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 249.
JORDAAN. M. 2000m. Fagaceae (Hamamelidae-Fagales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa; families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 303, 304.
JORDAAN. M. 2000n. Fumariaceae (Magnoliidae-Papaverales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 308. 309.
JORDAAN. M. 2000o. Grubbiaceae (Dilleniidae-Ericales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 316.
JORDAAN. M. 2000p. Hamamelidaceae (Hamamelidae-Hamameli-
dales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: fami-
lies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 318.
JORDAAN, M. 2000q. Hernandiaceae (Magnoliidae-Magnoliales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 318. 319.
JORDAAN. M. 2000r. Hydnoraceae (Magnoliidae-Aristolochiales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 319, 320.
JORDAAN. M. 2000s. Lauraceae (Magnoliidae-Magnoliales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 334—336.
JORDAAN, M, 2000t. Monimiaceae (Magnoliidae-Magnoliales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 414.
JORDAAN, M, 2000u. Montiniaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 414, 415.
JORDAAN, M. 2000v. Moraceae (Hamamelidae-Urticales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 415. 416.
JORDAAN, M. 2000w. Moringaceae (Dilleniidae-Capparidales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 417.
JORDAAN, M. 20()0x. Myricaceae (Hamamelidae-Juglandales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 418.
JORDAAN, M. 2000y. Myrothamnaceae (Hamamelidae-Hamameli-
dales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: fami-
lies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 418, 419.
JORDAAN, M. 2000z. Neuradaceae (Dilleniidae-Malvales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 423.
JORDAAN. M. 2000za. Nyctaginaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophylla-
les). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10: 424-426.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zb, Olacaceae (Rosidae-Santalales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 427, 428.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zc. Opiliaceae (Rosidae-Santalales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10:431.432.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zd. Papaveraceae (Magnoliidae-Ranunculales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 433, 434.
JORDAAN. M. 2000ze. Phytolaccaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophyl-
lales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10: 442—444.
JORDAAN. M. 2000zf. Piperaceae (Magnoliidae-Piperales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 444, 445.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zg. Pittosporaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 445. 446,
JORDAAN, M. 2000zh. Portulacaceae (Caryophyllidae-Caryophyl-
lales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10: 453^56.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zi. Rafflesiaceae (Magnoliidae-Aristolochiales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 462.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zj. Resedaceae (Dilleniidae-Capparidales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 464, 465.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zk. Roridulaceae (Dilleniidae-Ericales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 470.
JORDAAN. M. 2000zl. Rosaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 470-476.
JORDAAN, M. 2000zm. Salicaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 499-501.
JORDAAN. M. 2000zn. Ulmaceae (Dilleniidae-Urticales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 550, 551.
JORDAAN, M. 200()zo. Urticaceae (Dilleniidae-Urticales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 552-555.
JORDAAN. M. 2000zp. Vahliaceae (Rosidae-Rosales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10; 556.
JORDAAN, M. & BURGOYNE, P. 2000. Santalaceae (Rosidae-
Santalales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 501-503.
JORDAAN, M. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000. Systematic studies in sub-
family Celastroideae (Celastraceae) in southern Africa: two
new species of Gymnosporia from KwaZulu-Natal and the
Eastern Cape. South African Journal of Botany 66: 10-14.
KILLICK, D.J.B. 2000. Obituary: Rosemary Charlotte Holcroft
(1942-2000). Bothalia 30: 221-223,
KOEKEMOER. M. 2000, Abstract: The Metalasia group (Gnaphalieae —
Relhaniinae, Asteraceae). XVlth AETFAT Congress, 28 August
to 2 September 2000. Scripta Botanica Belgica 20: 45.
KOEKEMOER, M. & FISH. L. 2000. Abstract of poster: Exploration
in southern Africa — analysis from herbarium records. XVlth
AETFAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000. Scripta
Botanica Belgica 20: 45.
260
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
KOORBANALLY. N.A.. MULHOLLAND. D.A. & CROUCH, N.R.
2000a. Alkaloids and triterpenoids from Ammocharis coranica
(Amaryllidaceae). Phytochemisti-v 54: 93-97.
KOORBANALLY, N.A., MULHOLLAND, D.A. & CROUCH, N.R.
2000b. Isolation of isovanillin from aromatic roots of the med-
icinal African liane, Mondia whitei. Journal of Herbs, Spices &
Medicinal Plants 7.3: 37^3.
KURZWEIL, H. 2000a. Orchidaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 155-174.
KURZWEIL, H. 2000b. Orchidaceae (Liliidae-Orchidales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 644—659.
KURZWEIL. H. 2000c, The value of early floral ontogeny in the sys-
tematics of Orchidaceae. In K.L. Wilson & D.A. Momson,
Monocots: systeinatics and evolution: 436-440. CSIRO,
Melbourne.
KURZWEIL. H. 2001 . Notes on the botany of Mt Kinabalu (Malaysia).
Mountain Club of South Africa Journal 1999.
KURZWEIL. H. & LINDER, H.P, 2001. Tribe Diseae (Orchidaceae),
In A. Pridgeon, PJ. Cribb, M. Chase & E.N. Rasmussen, Genera
Orchidacearum 2: 1 1-58. Oxford University Press.
KURZWEIL. H. & LINDER, H.P. 2001a. Dracomonticoia (Orchida-
ceae), In A. Pridgeon. PJ. Cribb, M. Chase & E.N. Rasmussen,
Genera Orchidacearum 2: 288-290. Oxford University Press.
KURZWEIL. H. & LINDER, H.P. 2001b. Neobohisia (Orchidaceae).
In A. Pridgeon, PJ. Cribb, M. Chase & E.N. Rasmussen. Genera
Orchidacearum 2: 317-319. Oxford University Press.
KURZWEIL, H. & SMITH, G.E. 2000. Les Orchidees succulentes
d'Afrique du Sud: un synopsis mis a jour (1). Succulentes
(France) 23,4: 24—32.
LEISTNER. O.A. (ed.) 2000. Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10.
LEISTNER, O.A. & BREDENKAMP. C.L. 2000. Malvaceae
(Dilleniidae-Mal vales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of south-
ern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 347-352.
LEPSCHI, B.J. & MANNING. J.C. 2000. A taxonomic review of the
naturalized species of Babiana (Iridaceae) occurring in Western
Australia. Nuvtsia 13: 283-292.
LINDER, H.P. & KURZWEIL, H. 2001. Schizochiius (Orchidaceae).
In A. Pridgeon. PJ. Cribb, M. Chase & E.N. Rasmussen, Genera
Orchidacearum 2: 361-364. Oxford University Press,
LOTTER. M.. AUBREY, A„ DOBSON, L. & EYSSEL, A. 2000. Plant
collecting expedition on Blyde River Canyon Nature Reserve.
Plantlife 23: 12-14.
MALCOLM, N. 2000. What's new at the National Botanical Institute?
Veld & Flora 86: 58.
MANNING. J.C. 2000a. A new combination in Eriospermum
(Convallariaceae). Bothalia 30: 157.
MANNING, J.C. 2000b. Rising from the ashes. African — Environment
& Wildlife 8: 24.
MANNING, J.C. 2000c. Diamonds in the dust. African — Environment
& Wildlife 8: 30.
MANNING, J.C. & PATERSON-JONES, C. 2000, Seeing red. Birds
and the flowers they pollinate. Africa — Birds & Birding: 40-49.
MANNING, J.C, & SMITH, G.E. 2000. The genus Poellnitzia includ-
ed in Astroloha (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae). Bothalia 30: 53.
MCDONALD. D.J. 2000. Floral secrets of the Bontebok National
Park. Veld & Flora 86: 70-72.
MCDONALD, D.J., BOUCHER, C. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 2()()(). Obituai7:
Hugh Colin Taylor (1925-1999). Bothalia 30: 115-119.
MEEROW, A.W.. FAY, M.F., CHASE. M.W., GUY, C,L„ LI, Q-B.,
SNIJMAN, D.A. & YANG. S-Y, 2000. Phylogeny of
Amaryllidaceae: molecules and morphology. In K. Wilson & D.
Morrison, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium
on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons: 368-382,
CSIRO Press, Sydney.
MEYER, N.L. 2()00a. Alliaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales), In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 569. 570,
MEYER. N.L. 2000b. Anthericaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera,
Strelitzia 10: 576, 577.
MEYER. N.L. 2000c. Asparagaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 582.
MEYER, N.L. 2000d. Colchicaceae (Liliidae-Liliales), In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 587-590.
MEYER. N.L. 2000e. Eriospermaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 607, 608.
MEYER. N.L. 2000f, Liliaceae (Liliidae-Liliales), In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 642,
MEYER. N.L. 2000g. Luzuriagaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 643.
MEYER, N.L. 2000h. Smilacaceae (Liliidae-Dioscoreales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 734.
MEYER, N.L. & ARCHER. R.H. 2000. Agapanthaceae (Liliidae-
Asparagales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 566.
MEYER, N.L. & SMITH. G.E. 2000. Astroloba (Asphodelaceae). In P.
Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the
Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 66, 67.
MIDGLEY. G., ASHWELL. A., RUTHERFORD. M., BOND, W, &
HANNAH, L. 2000. Peace Parks Foundation Review: Beyond
boundaries. Climate change in southern Africa. Africa —
Environment & Wildlife: 26-29.
MOMBERG. B.A. 2000. Compiler: National Botanical Institute South
Africa: administration and research staff 31 March 2000, publi-
cations 1 April 1999-31 March 2000. Bothalia 30: 229-242.
MOSSMER. M. 2000. From the web. SABONET News 5: 100. 101.
MOSSMER. M. & WILLIS. C.K. 2000a. Review: Plant taxonomic
expertise. An inventory for southern Africa. SABONET News 5:
83. 84.
MOSSMER. M. & WILLIS. C.K. 2000b. Plant taxonomic expertise.
An inventory for southern Africa. SABONET Report No. 10.
National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
NGWENYA, M.A. 2000. Myrsinaceae (Dilleniidae-Primulales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 419, 420.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 2000. National grid of vegetation sites: reality
check. South African Journal of Science 96: 231-233.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 2000a. Ericaceae (Dilleniidae-Ericales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 246-248.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 2000b. Systematics of Erica (Ericaceae-Ericeae):
species with indehiscent and partially dehiscent fruits.
Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 19. University of Cape
Town & National Botanical Institute.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 2000c. Southern African herbaria. Compton
Herbarium (NBG). SABONET News 5: 194-196.
OLIVER. E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 2000a. Two new species oi Erica
from Western Cape, South Africa (Ericaceae). Bothalia 30:
49-53.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 2000b. Three new species of Erica
(Ericaceae) from Western Cape, South Africa, Bothalia 30:
147-153.
OLIVER, E,G.H. & OLIVER I.M. 2000c. Ericaceae. In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 423^52.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 2001a. The ultimate prize — a new
species of Erica. Yearbook of the Heather Society 2001: 9-14.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M, 2001b. Taxonomic problems in the
Erica filipendula complex. Yearbook of the Heather Society
2001:39-46.
OLIVER, I. 2()0(), A unique desert garden in the winter rainfall area of
South Africa. Aloe 37: 28-30.
OLIVER. I. & OLIVER, T. (E.G.H.) 2000. Field guide to the Ericas of
the Cape Peninsula. Protea Atlas Project. National Botanical
Institute, Cape Town.
PEROLD, S.M. 2()00a. Studies in the Sphaerocaipales (Hepaticae)
from southern Africa. 2. The genus Sphaerocarpos and its only
local species, S. stipitatus. Bothalia 30: 17-24.
PEROLD, S.M. 2000b, Studies in the Sphaerocarpales (Hepaticae)
from southern Africa. 3. The genus Riella and its local species.
Bothalia .30: 125-142.
POHL, T.S., CROUCH, N.R. & MULHOLLAND, D.A. 2000.
Southern African Hyacinthaceae: chemistry, bioactivity and
ethnobotany. Current Organic Chemistry 4:l2^7-\324.
REBELO, A.G. (ed.). 2000. Interitn distribution map. KwaZulu-Natal, edn
2. Protea Atlas Project. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G. (ed.). 2001a. Interim distribution map. Cape, edn 3.
vol. I: sugarbushes. grevilleoids and allies. Protea Atlas
Project, National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
261
REBELO. A.G. (ed.). 2001b. Interim distribution map. Cape, edn 3,
vol. 2: pincushions and allies. Protea Atlas Project, National
Botanical Institute. Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. (ed.). 2001c. Interim distribution map. Cape, edn 3,
vol. 3: conebushes. Protea Atlas Project, National Botanical
Institute. Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. (ed.). 200 Id. Interim distribution map, northern provinces.
Protea Atlas Project, National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. & REBELO, P. (eds). 2000a. Interim distribution map.
Zimbabwe, edn 2. Protea Atlas Project, National Botanical
Institute. Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. & REBELO, P. 2000b. Protea Atlas Newsletter 46.
Protea Atlas Project, Kirstenbosch, Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. & REBELO, P. 2000c. Protea Atlas Newsletter 47.
Protea Atlas Project. Kirstenbosch, Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G. & REBELO. P. 2000d. Protea Atlas Newsletter 48.
Protea Atlas Project. Kirstenbosch, Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. & REBELO. P. 2000e. Protea Adas Newsletter 49.
Protea Atlas Project, Kirstenbosch. Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. & REBELO, P. 2001. Protea Atlas Newsletter 50.
Protea Atlas Project, Kirstenbosch, Cape Town.
RETIEF. E. 2000a. Avicenniaceae (Asteridae-Lamiales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 171.
RETIEF. E. 2000b. Boraginaceae (Asteridae-Lamiales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 178-183.
RETIEF. E. 2000c. Hydrophyllaceae (Asteridae-Solanales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 320, 321.
RETIEF. E. 2000d. Lamiaceae (Labiatae) (Asteridae-Lamiales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 323-334.
RETIEE. E. 2000e. Verbenaceae (Asteridae-Lamiales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera,
Strelitzia 10: 557-559.
RETIEF. E. 2000L Vitaceae (Rosidae-Rhamnales). In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 561. 562.
RETIEE, E. 2000g. Zygophyllaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 563-565.
RETIEF. E. 2000h. Review: Oxyanthus (Rubiaceae-Gardenieae-
Gardeniiae) en Afrique Centrale: etude systematique. by B.
Sonke. Bothaiia 30: 226. 227.
RETIEF, E. & BUYS. M.H, 2000a. Boraginaceae. In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning. Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 374, 375.
RETIEF. E. & BUYS, M.H. 2000b. Trichodesma (Boraginaceae). In P.
Goldblatt & J.C. Manning. Cape plants. A conspectus of the
Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 311 .
RETIEF. E. & LEISTNER, O.A. 2000. Rubiaceae (Asteridae-
Rubiales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 476—495.
RETIEF. E. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2000a (1999). Ehretiaceae versus
Boraginaceae: evidence from palynology. Proceedings of the
4th Symposium on African Palynology, Sousse, Tunisia, 25-30
April 1999. Geo-Eco-Trop. Special issue 22: 209-219.
RETIEF. E. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2000b ( 1999). The taxonomic signifi-
cance of pollen morphology in the southern African
Boraginaceae. In J. Timberlake & S. Kativu. African plants:
biodiversity, taxonomy and uses: 319-329. Royal Botanic
Gardens. Kew.
ROURKE. J.P 2000a. Proteaceae (Rosidae-Proteales). In O.A. Leistner.
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 457-J61.
ROURKE. J.P. 2000b. Stilbaceae (Asteridae-Lamiales). In O.A. Leistner.
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 541-543.
ROURKE. J.P. 2000c. A review of generic concepts in the Stilbaceae.
Bothaiia 30: 9-15.
ROURKE. J.P. 2000d. Plant systematics in South Africa. A brief his-
torical overview, 1753-1953. Transactions of the Royal Society
of South Africa 54: 179-190.
ROUX, J.P. 2000a. Pteridophytes, ferns and fern-allies. In P. Goldblatt
& J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 37-50, 691, 692.
ROUX, J.P. 2000b. A new combination and new records for the Flora
of Malawi (Pteridophyta). Bothaiia 30: 155, 156.
ROUX, J.P. 2000c. The genus Polystichum ( Dryopteridaceae ) in
Africa. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London
(Botany) 30: 33-79.
ROUX, J.P. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000. Morphology and anatomy of the
rhizome and frond in the African species of Polystichum
(Pteropsida: Dryopteridaceae). Bothaiia 30: 57-68.
SIEBERT, S.J. 2000. Editorial. SABONET News 5: 135.
SIEBERT, S.J. & GLEN, H.F. 2000. The paper chase. SABONET News
5: 198-202.
SIEBERT, S.J, & WILLIS, C.K. 2000a, Computerisation of southern
African herbaria: a regional update. SABONET News 5: 1 82-184.
SIEBERT, S.J. & WILLIS, C.K. 2000b. The Southern African Botanical
Diversity Network (SABONET). The Bridge 1,7: 10. II.
SIMMONS. MR, CLEVINGER, C.C., SAVOLAINEN, V.V.,
ARCHER. R.H., MATHEWS, S. & DOYLE. J.J. 2001.
Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B
gene sequence and morphology. American Journal of Botanx
88:313-325.
SINGH, Y. 2000a, Acoraceae (Arecidae-Arales). In O.A. Leistner,
Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia
10: 566.
SINGH, Y. 2000b. Araceae (Arecidae-Arales). In O.A. Leistner. Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10:
578-580,
SINGH, Y. 2000c. lUBS — advancing biology in the 21st century.
SABONET News 5 : 161, 162.
SINGH, Y. & BAIJNATH, H. 2000. Abstract of poster: species diver-
sity in southern African Hypoxis (Hypoxidaceae). XVIth AET-
FAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000. Scripta Bota-
nica Beigica 20: 83.
SMITH. G.F. 2000a. Golden age of disseminating information on
Haworthia. In I. Breuer. World of haworthias, Vol. 2: viii, ix.
Ingo Breuer & Arbeitskreis fiir Mammillarienfreunde e. V.
(Afm), Niederzier & Homburg/Saar.
SMITH, G.F. 2000b. Repertorium Piantarum Succuientarum: a main-
stay of the International Organization for Succulent Plant Study.
Repertorium Piantarum Succuientarum 50: 3, International
Organization for Succulent Plant Study, Zurich.
SMITH. G.F. 2000c. Geographical corrections to the ISI 2000 plant
distribution list: Aloe wickensii and Haworthia venosa subsp.
wooleyi. Haworthiad 14: 121, 122.
SMITH, G.F. 2000d. Message from the President. lOS Bulletin 8: 1-3.
SMITH. G.F. 2000e. Triennial report on activities of the International
Organization for Succulent Plant Study (lOS): 1997-2000. lOS
Bulletin 8: 30-33.
SMITH. G.F. 2000f. Succulents in the Missouri Botanical Garden.
British Cactus & Succulent Journal 18: 201-205.
SMITH, G.F. 2000g. Simply systematics: succulent plant studies into
the new millenium. lOS Bulletin 8: 26, 27.
SMITH, G.F. 2000h. Goodbye (but not farewell), Chris. Your big heart
will be missed. SABONET News 5: 138.
SMITH, G.F. 2000i. A memorable occasion: the 16th International
Botanical Congress. SABONET News 5: 19-22.
SMITH, G.F. 2000j. An African workshop on the Global Taxonomy
Initiative. SABONET News 5: 154.
SMITH, G.F. 2000k. Agavaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 567.
SMITH, G.F. 20001. Asphodelaceae: Aloe. In P. Goldblatt & J.C.
Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South
Africa. Strelitzia 9: 64-66.
SMITH. G.F. 2000m. Further developments in the Species Piantarum:
Flora of the World project. South African Journal of Science 96:
482. 483.
SMITH. G.F. & MEYER, N.L. 2000. Asphodelaceae (Liliidae-Aspara-
gales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: fami-
lies and genera. Strelitzia 10: 582-586.
SMITH. G.F & RARER, I. 2000. Producing South African Journal of
Botany: current realities and future perspectives. South African
Journal of Botany 66: 2-6.
SMITH, G.F. & STEYN, E.M.A. 2000. Obituary: Barbara Joan Jeppe
(1921-1999): botanical artist extraordinaire. Bothaiia 30: 1 19-122.
SMITH, G.F. STEYN, E.M.A. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2001. Cras.sula
tetragona subsp. acutifolia (Crassulaceae). Curtis's Botanical
Magazine 18: 23-21.
SMITH. G.F.. STEYN. E.M.A., VICTOR. J.E.. CROUCH. N.R.,
GOLDING, J. & HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 2000. The conserva-
tion status of Aioe in South Africa: an updated synopsis
(Aloaceae). Bothaiia 30: 207-21 1.
262
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
SMITH, G.F., VAN WYK, B-E„ STEYN, E.M.A. & BREUER, I. 2000.
Classification of Haworthia: perspectives from nectar sugar
analysis and moiphology, Scripta Botanica Belgian 20: 84.
SMITH, G.F.. ZIETSMAN, PC., STEYN. E.M.A. & BREUER, I. 2000.
The distribution of Haworthia venosa subsp. tessellata in
southern Africa. Haworthiad 14: 40—43.
SMITHIES, S.J. 2000a. Bignoniaceae ( Asteridae-Scrophulariales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 175-178.
SMITHIES, S.J. 2000b. Gesneriaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales). In
O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 314.
SMITHIES, S.J. 2000c. Lentibulariaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 336, 337.
SMITHIES, S.J. 2()00d. Pedaliaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10 : 436—440.
SMITHIES. S.J. 2000e. Scrophulariaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales).
In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera. Strelitzia 10: 508-537.
SNIJMAN. D.A. 2000a. Agapanthaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C.
Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South
Africa. Strelitzia 9: 52.
SNIJMAN. D.A. 2000b. Alliaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 52.
SNIJMAN. D.A. 2000c. Amaryllidaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 53-60.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 2000d. Amaryllidaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 570-576.
SNIJMAN. D.A. 2000e. Hypoxidaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J.C.
Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South
Africa. Strelitzia 9: 108-110.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 2000f. Hypoxidaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 621-623.
STEINER. K. 2000a. Colpias (Scrophulariaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 645.
STEINER, K. 2000b. Dia.scia (Scrophulariaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 645-648.
STEINER. K. 2000c, Hemimeris (Scrophulariaceae). In P. Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of
South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 651. 652.
STEYN, E.M.A. & SMITH, G.F 2()0(), Agave vivipara: a naturalized
alien in southern Africa (Agavaceae). Bothalia 30: 43-46.
STEWART, A., BROWN. N.A.C. & DIXON, K. 2000 (1999). Smoke
and seed germination. In Let’s propagate. A plant propagation
manual for Australia'. 171-184. ABC Books. Australian
Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney.
SWARTZ, P. 2000. Woude en hul omkringende grasvelde. Deel 2:
Ngome, plek van die skaduwee. Veld & Flora 86: 67-69.
SYMONDS, A. 2000. Teacher capacity building: skills development
through environmental education. Roots 20: 25-28.
TARR, B. 2000, The great yellow Clivia jigsaw puzzle. Clivia
Yearbook 2'. 10-12.
THORNELL. K., VEDAVATHY, S., MULHOLLAND, D.A. &
CROUCH, N.R. 2000. Parallel usage patterns of African and
Indian periplocoids corroborate phenolic root chemistry.
Southern African Ethnobotany 1,2: 17-22.
VAN DER WALT, L. 2000. Hanging gardens at Kirstenbosch. Veld &
Flora 86: 38.
VAN JAARSVELD. E. 2000a. Indigenous fish for a garden pond. Veld
& Flora 86: 36, 37.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 20006. Saphesia Jlacclda — a con.servation sta-
tus update. British Cactus & Succulent Journal 18: 108, 109.
VAN JAARSVELD. E. 2000c. Review: Fachypodium (Apocynaceae),
taxonomy habitats and cultivation, by S.H.J.V. Rapanarivo et
ah Veld & Flora 86: 192.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 2000d. Welwitschia mirabilis. Veld & Flora 86:
176-179.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 2000c, Waterbesparende Inheenise tuinniaak.
Tufclberg, Kaapstad.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 20001'. Wonderful waterwi.se gardening.
Tafelberg. Cape Town.
VAN JAARSVELD. E. & VAN WYK. B-E. 2000. South Afriean and
Namibian succulents on the edge: the cliff face home. Aloe 37:
88-90.
VAN JAARSVELD, E„ VAN WYK, B-E. & SMITH, G.F 2000.
Succulents of South Africa. A guide to the regional diversity.
Tafelberg, Cape Town.
VAN ROOY. J. 2000. Introduction to bryology in southern Africa. 8.
Moss diversity and endemism. Plantlife 23: 31, 32.
VAN STADEN, J., BROWN, N.A.C,, JAGER, A.K. & JOHNSON,
T.A. 2000. Smoke as a germination cue. Plant Species Biology
15: 167-178.
VAN WYK, E., CILLIERS, S.S. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. 2000.
Vegetation analysis of wetlands in the Klerksdorp Municipal
Area, North West Province, South Africa, South African
Journal of Botany 66: 52-62.
VAN WYK, E. & HURTER, J. 2000. Brachystegia spicifonnis. An
exciting discovery. SABONET News 5: 170-172.
VICTOR, J.E. 2000a. Buddlejaceae (Asteridae-Gentianales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera,
Strelitzia 10: 195, 196.
VICTOR, J.E. 2000b. Heteropyxidaceae (Rosidae-Myrtales), In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 319.
VICTOR, J.E. 2000c. Oleaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 428, 429.
VICTOR, J.E. 2000d. Rutaceae (Rosidae-Sapindales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 495-499.
VICTOR. J.E. 2()0()e. Strychnaceae (Asteridae-Gentianales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 543.
VICTOR. J.E. 2000f ( 1999). What’s happening in the Asclepiadaceae.
In J. Timberlake & S. Kativu, African plants: biodiversity, tax-
onomy and iLses'. 339. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
VICTOR, J.E,. BREDENKAMP C.L., VENTER. H.J.T., BRUYNS,
PV. & NICHOLAS, A. 2000. Apocynaceae (Asteridae-
Gentianales). In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 71-98.
VICTOR. J.E., HOARE, D.B. & LUBKE, R.A. 2000. Checklist of
plant species of the coastal fynbos and rocky headlands, south
of George, South Africa. Bothalia 30: 97-101.
VICTOR, J.E. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000 (1999). Pollen morphology of
Phyllosma and Sheilanthera (Diosminae: Rutaceae) and its tax-
onomic implications. Grana 39: 103-107.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000a. National Botanical Institute Garden Festival,
17 October 1998. Dendron 34: 25.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000b. National Botanical Garden, outing of
Magalies Branch, 28 June 1998. Dendron 34: 36-38.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000c. Campanulaceae (Asteridae-Asterales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 200-202,
WELMAN, W.G. 2000d. Convolvulaceae (Asteridae-Solanales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 231-234.
WELMAN, W.G, 2000e. Cucurbitaceae (Dilleniidae-Violales), In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era, Strelitzia 10: 237-241.
WELMAN, W.G. 2()()0f. Dipsacaceae (Asteridae-Dipsacales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 243.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000g. Goodeniaceae (Asteridae-Campanulales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 315.
WELMAN, W.G. 2()0()h, Lobeliaceae (Asteridae-Asterales). In O.A.
Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 339, 340,
WELMAN, W.G. 2000i. Myoporaceae (Asteridae-Scrophulariales). In
O.A, Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 417.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000J. Plantaginaceae (Asteridae-Plantaginales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 446.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000k. Solanum (Solanaceae), In P. Goldblatt & J.C.
Manning, Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South
Africa. Strelitzia 9: 673-675.
WELMAN. W.G. 20001. Solanaceae (Asteridae-Solanales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Sirelitzia 10: 537-539.
Bothalia31.2 (2001)
263
WELMAN, W.G. 2000m. Sphenocleaceae (Asteridae-Asterales). In
O. A. Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa; families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 539.
WELMAN, W.G. 2000n. Valerianaceae (Asteridae-Dipsacales). In
O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Africa: families and gen-
era. Strelitzia 10: 556, 557,
WELMAN, W.G. 2000o. FSA contributions 16: Sphenocleaceae. Botha-
lia 30: 31-33.
WELMAN. W.G. 2000p. The Vth International Solanaceae
Conference. 23-28 July 2000. SABONET News 5: 155-160.
WILLIAMS. R. 2000. Hyacinthaceae (Liliidae-Asparagales). In O.A.
Leistner. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera.
Strelitzia 10: 610-619.
WILLIS, C. 2000a. Amongst Africa's giants. Botanical notes from a
journey to Mount Kilimanjaro. Veld & Flora 86: 162-167.
WILLIS, C. 2000b. Editorial. SABONET News 5: 2. 3.
WILLIS, C. 2000c. Editorial. SABONET News 5: 78, 79.
WILLIS, C. 2000d. Southern African botanical gardens needs assess-
ment published. SABONET News 5: 185-190.
WILLIS. C., BURROWS. J.E.. PHIRL P.S.M.. KAMUNDI. D.A.I.,
CHIKUNL A. & GOLDING, J, 2000. Abstract: Developing a
greater understanding of the flora of the Nyika. XVIth AETEAT
Congress, 28 August to 2 September 2000. Scripta Botanica
Belgica 20:
WILLIS, C., BURROWS. J. & WINTER. P. 2000. SABONET Nyika
Expedition 2000. SABONET News 5: 5-14.
WILLIS. C.K. & HUNTLEY. B.J. 2000. Abstract: SABONET: devel-
oping capacity within southern Africa's herbaria and botanical
gardens. X’VIth AETEAT Congress, 28 August to 2 September
2000. Scripta Botanica Belgica 20: 94.
WILLIS, C.K. & MOSSMER, M. (eds). 2000a. SABONET News 5,1.
WILLIS, C.K. & MOSSMER. M. (eds). 2000b. SABONET News 5,2.
WINTER, J. 2000. The natural distribution and ecology of Clivia.
Olivia Yearbook 2; 5-9.
Bothalia 31,2: 265-274 (2001)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear in
bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance
of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxon-
omy. ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the
journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
1 Editorial policy
1.1 Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with
flora and vegetation of southern Africa and related sub-
jects. Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book
reviews and obituaries of botanists, are accepted. The edi-
tor should be notified that an article is part of a series
of MSS; please submit a list of the parts of a series; all
parts should preferably be published in one journal.
1 .2 Submission of a manuscript to Bothalia implies
that it has not been published previously and is not
being considered for publication elsewhere.
1.3 Authors whose first language is not English are
requested to have their MS edited by an English
speaker before submission.
1.4 Articles are assessed by referees, both local and
overseas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible refer-
ees to judge their work. Authors are responsible for the
factual correctness of their contributions. Bothalia main-
tains an editorial board (see title page) to ensure that
international standards are upheld.
1 .5 Page charges: as stated in our notification includ-
ed in volume 23.1 (May 1993), MSS submitted for pub-
lication in Bothalia are subject to payment of page
charges of R 125,00 per printed page, VAT included. The
following are exempt from these charges: 1. NBI mem-
bers; 2, persons/institutions who have been granted
exemption by the Executive Committee of the NBI; 3,
authors of contributions requested by the Editor; 4, con-
tributors to the column "FSA contributions’. The Editor’s
decision on the number of pages is final. An invoice will
be sent to the author, who must arrange for payment as
soon as possible to NBI, Publications Section, Private
Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
2 Requirements for a manuscript
2.1 The original manuscript should be typed on one
side of A4-size paper, double line spacing throughout
(including abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature
references, etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all
round. Three photocopies (all pages photocopied on
both sides of the paper, including figures, to reduce
weight for postage) of all items, including text, line
drawings, tables and lists should be submitted, and the
author should retain a complete set of copies. Three
photographs (or high quality photocopies) of each
photograph/photograph mosaic should be submitted
for review purposes. The electronic version should be
submitted with the final (accepted) manuscript (see 3).
2.2 Papers should conform to the general style and lay-
out of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 26 onwards).
2.3 Material should be presented in the following
sequence: Title page with title, name(s) of author) s), key-
words, abstract (and information that should be placed in
a footnote on the title page, such as address(es) of
author(s) and mention of granting agencies).
2.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and
aims, Contents (see 8), Material and methods. Results,
Interpretation (Discussion). Specimens examined (in revi-
sions and monographs). Acknowledgements, References.
Index of names (recommended for revisions dealing with
more than about 15 species). Tables, Captions for figures
and figures. In the case of short notes, obituaries and book
reviews, keywords and abstract are superfluous.
2.5 All pages must be numbered consecutively
beginning with the title page to those with references,
tables, captions for figures and figures.
2.6 Special characters: use your own word or code that
is unique and self-explanatory, enclosed between
ANGLE BRACKETS, e.g. <mu>m for pm. Please sup-
ply us with a list of the codes.
2.7 Use a non-breaking space (in MS Word — Ctrl,
shift, space) to keep two elements together on the same
line, e.g. 3 500.
2.8 DO NOT JUSTIEY LINES.
2.9 Do not break words, except hyphenated words.
2.10 A hyphen is designated as one dash, with no space
between the letter and the dash. e.g. ovate-lanceolate.
See also 17.6.
2.11 An N-dash is typed in MS Word code (alt -i- 0150)
or as three hyphens with no space between the letter
and the hyphen, e.g. 2 5 mm (typeset, it looks like
this, 2-5 mm).
2.12 An M-dash is typed in MS Word code (alt -i- 0151)
or as two hyphens with no space between the letter and
the hyphen, e.g. computers- -what a blessing! (typeset,
it looks like this: computers — what).
2.13 Do not use a double space anywhere between
words, after commas, full stops, colons, semicolons or
exclamation marks.
2. 14 Use lower case x as times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
2.15 Use single (not double) opening and closing
quotes, e.g. the so-called ‘stiffy’ refers to a rigid diskette.
266
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
2. 16 Keys — put only three leader dots before number of
taxon (with one space before and after each dot), regard-
less of how far or near the word is from the right margin,
e.g. ... \. R. ovata (see 13.18).
3 Requirements for diskettes/stiffies
(text to be submitted only with final/accepted version)
3. 1 USE NORMAL STYLE ONLY.
3.2 Electronic files can be provided on 1.4 MB stiffie
disks, Iomega zip diskettes, 640 MB optical disks for
Apple Mac or on CD.
3.3 Data must be IBM compatible and written in
ASCII, or in Word 97 for Windows 95/98. An rtf file
is preferable because it retains the formatting.
3.4 All lines, headings, keys, etc., should start flush at
the margin, therefore NO INDENTATIONS, FOOT-
NOTES, TABS OR STYLES of any kind.
3.5 In MS Word, italics and bold should be used where
necessary.
3.6 Paragraphs and headings are delineated by a car-
riage return (ENTER) but no indentation.
3.7 Graphics i.e. drawings, graphs or photographs:
submit in a separate file, must not be included in the text.
3.8 Image files with a bigger file size than 1MB can-
not be e-mailed as the NBI has a 1MB limitation on the
network’s firewall at Head Office.
3.9 If any image file was originated in CorelDraw ver-
sions 3-9, please provide the image file as a CDR file (please
include fonts). The conversion to TIE or other file extensions
will be accommodated by the NBI (see 12.2, 12.3).
3.10 If extensive changes to image files are proposed by
the editor, the author will be contacted and the specific
image file will have to be re-submitted after the indicat-
ed corrections have been implemented.
4 Author(s)
When there are several authors, the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
5 Title
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects, the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but
author citations should he omitted from plant names
(see also 1 3.6).
6 Keywords
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be pro-
vided in English in alphabetical sequence. The follow-
ing points should be borne in mind when selecting key-
words:
6. 1 Keywords should be unambiguous, internationally
acceptable words and not recently coined little-known
words.
6.2 They should be in a noun form and verbs should be
avoided.
6.3 They should not consist of an adjective alone;
adjectives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 They should not contain prepositions.
6.5 The singular form should be used for processes and
properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 The plural form should be used for physical ob-
jects, e.g. augers.
6.7 Location (province and/or country); taxa (species,
genus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld
type, biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 Keywords should be selected hierarchically where
possible, e.g. both family and species should be included.
6.9 They should include terms used in the title.
6.10 They should answer the following questions:
6.10.1 What is the active concept in the document
(activity, operation or process).
6.10.2 What is the passive concept or object of the
active process (item on which the activity, operation or
process takes place).
6. 10.3 What is the means of accomplishment or how is
the active concept achieved (technique, method, appara-
tus, operation or process).
6.10.4 What is the environment in which the active
concept takes place (medium, location).
6.10.5 What are the independent (controlled) and de-
pendent variables?
6.11 Questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also
be answered in the title.
7 Abstract
7.1 Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be
provided. Abstracts are of great importance and should
convey the essence of the article.
7.2 They should refer to the geographical area con-
cerned and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of
taxa treated. They should not contain information not
appearing in the article.
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely related
subjects all taxa from the rank of genus downwards should
be accompanied by their author citations (see also 13.6).
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
267
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations
should not be italicized but put in bold. If the article
deals with too many taxa, only the important ones should
be mentioned.
8 Table of contents
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about 60 typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
9 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please
give all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
1 0 Literature references
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of lit-
erature references in taxonomic papers see 14.
10.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper, use the name of the first author followed by et al.
10.3 When referring to more than one literature refer-
ence, they should be arranged chronologically and sep-
arated by a semicolon, e.g. (Nixon 1940; Davis 1976;
Anon. 1981, 1984).
10.4 Titles of books and names of journals should
preferably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good
reason for doing so, they should be treated as described
in 10.12 & 10.13.
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the
text, not in the list of references. Please add the person’s
full initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C.
Boucher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
10.6 References of the same author are arranged in
chronological sequence.
10.7 Where two or more references by the same author
are listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated
with every reference, except in an obituary, where the
name of the deceased in the list of publications (not in
the references) is replaced by an N-dash.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct names
in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no personal com-
munications, are listed at the end of the manuscript under
the heading References.
10.9 The references are arranged alphabetically accord-
ing to authors and chronologically under each author, with
a, b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author has published
more than one work in a year. This sequence is retained
when used in the text, irrespective of the chronology.
10. 10 If an author has published both on his own and as
a senior author with others, the solo publications are list-
ed first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence,
those published with one or more other authors.
10. 1 1 Author names are typed in capitals.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out in
full and are italicized as follows: Transactions of the
Linnean Society of London 5: 171-217, or Biology and
ecology of weeds'. 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature, edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of jour-
nals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific peri-
odicals.
10.14 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN. N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T, Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capeiisis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B, 1994. Combining skills: participatory
approaches in biodiversity conservation. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical
diversity in southern Africa. Strelitzia 1: 149-167. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa, edn 3, S.M. Haughton
(ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom, London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its
ecology. Bothalia 18: 219-19,1 .
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45-70.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35^4.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of
Rooiberg State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL. J.C. 1982. The age of the the Kuiseb river silt terrace at
Homeb. Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K. in prep. Dune
advancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession
chronology at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc, (Forestry) thesis. University of Stellenbosch.
MUNDAY, J, 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. (Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, techni-
cal note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
268
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
BAWDEN. M.G. & CARROL, D.M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division,
Directorate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research
Institute. In A.E.F. Heydom, Proceedings of workshop research in
Cape estuaries: 105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology,
CSIR, Stellenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of
the committee on the protection of building timbers in South Africa
against termites, woodboring beetles andfiingi, edn 2. CSIR Research
Report No. 169.
1 1 Tables (also digital submissions)
11.1 Each table should be presented on a separate sheet
and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table
mentioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1 ’ .
11.2 In the captions of tables the word ‘TABLE’ is writ-
ten in capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia for
the format required.
11.3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can
often be reduced in width by interchanging primary hor-
izontal and vertical heads.
12 Figures (also digital submissions)
12.1 Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction,
into a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maxi-
mum vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space for the cap-
tion in the case of figures that will occupy a whole page.
12.2 Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams,
should be twice the size of the final reproduction and should
be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on fine Schoellers
Hammer Parole or similar paper, 200 gsm, or tracing film.
Lines should be bold enough and letters/ symbols large
enough to stand reduction. If submitted electronically,
provide the drawing as a TIF, BMP or JPG file at 600
dots per inch (dpi) and a hard copy of the figure.
1 2.3 Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast, and they
should be the same size as required in the journal. K
submitted electronically, provide as a TIF, BMP or JPG
file at 300 dpi. Include a hard copy of good quality.
12.4 Photograph mosaics should be submitted complete,
the component photographs mounted neatly on a white
flexible card base (can be curved around drum of
scanner) leaving a nanow gap of uniform width (2 mm)
between each print. Note that grouping photographs of
markedly divergent contrast results in poor reproductions.
12.5 Lettering on photograph mosaics, in capital let-
ters, should be put on a small white disk ± 7 mm in
diameter, if the background is dark, and placed in the
lower left hand corner of the relevant photo.
1 2.6 If several illustrations are treated as components of
a single composite figure they should be designated by
capital letters.
12.7 Note that the word ‘Figure’ should be written out
in full, both in the text and the captions and should begin
with a capital ‘F’ (but see 14.7 for taxonomic papers).
12.8 In the text the figure reference is then written as in
the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B) are...’
12.9 In captions, ‘FIGURE’ is written in capital letters.
Magnification of figures should be given for the size as
submitted.
12. 10 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on fig-
ures.
12.11 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers, vouch-
er specimens should be given in the relevant caption.
12.12 Figures are numbered consecutively with Arabic
numerals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author’s name and an indi-
cation of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.13 Captions of figures must not be pasted under the
photograph or drawing and must also not be included in
any electronic version.
12.14 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text where
they would like the figures to appear.
12.15 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures
returned must inform the editor in the original covering let-
ter and must mark each original ‘To be returned to author’.
12.16 Authors wishing to use illustrations already pub-
fished elsewhere must obtain written permission before
submitting the manuscript and inform the editor of this fact.
12.17 Captions for figures should be collected together
and typed at the end of the MS and headed Captions for
figures.
12.18 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic arti-
cles include dot maps as figures to show the distribution
of taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand
reduction to 80 mm (recommended size: 5 mm diameter).
12.19 Blank distribution maps of southern Africa, Afri-
ca and the world are available from the Bookshop, NBI
Pretoria.
12.20 A dot map PC programme for distribution of
taxa in South Africa, called MAPPIT is available for pur-
chase from the Data Section, National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
13 Text
13.1 As a rule, authors should use the plant names (but
not of all authors of plant names — see 13.6) as fisted in
PRECIS (National Herbarium PREtoria Computerised
Information System).
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usually
italicized, with the author citation (where relevant; see
13.6) not italicized. Exceptions include names of new
taxa in the abstract, correct names given in the synopsis
or in paragraphs on species excluded from a given
supraspecific group in taxonomic articles; in checklists
and in indices, where the position is reversed, correct
names are not italicized and synonyms are italicized.
Bothalia 31.2 (2001)
269
13.3 Names above generic level are not italicized.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy, the complete
scientific name of a plant (with author citation) should be
given at the first mention in the text. The generic name
should be abbreviated to the initial thereafter, except
where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 16.6).
13.5 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in
the synopsis of a species, Latin words such as nom.
nud. and et al. are not italicized (see 14.3, 16.4, 17.9).
13.6 In accordance with Gamock-Jones & Webb ( 1996)
in Taxon 45: 285. 286, authors of plant names are not to
be added to plant names except in taxonomic papers.
Names of authors of plant names should agree with the
list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, enti-
tled, Authors of plant names, edited by R.K. Brummitt &
C.E. Powell (1992).
13.7 Modem authors not included in the list should use
their full name and initials when publishing new plant
names. Other author names not in the list should be in
agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written out in
full, without initials, except in the synonymy in taxo-
nomic articles where they are treated like names of
authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are italicized whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also italicized, e.g. Acocks 14407.
13.10 Surnames beginning with ‘De’. ‘Du’ or ‘Van’
begin with a capital letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the Inter-
national System of Units (SI). In taxonomic papers
only mm and m, should be used; in ecological papers
cm or m should be used.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca (see 17.7).
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelt out in normal text,
and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic numerals.
13.14 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used
throughout. Write 2. 0-4. 5 (not 2^.5). When counting
members write 2 or 3 (not 2-3), but 2-4.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations end-
ing with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition = edn;
editor = ed.); after units of measure; after compass direc-
tions; after herbarium designations; after countries, e.g.
USA and after well-known institutions, e.g. CSIR.
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys
should be used with couplets numbered la- lb, 2a-2b,
etc. (without full stops thereafter).
13.17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no num-
bering.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in the
following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a sub-
merged aquatic with only the capitula exserted ... lb. F.
setaceum var. piimilum
lb Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small
marsh plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when
the habitat dries up; capitula without coarse white setae;
receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white .. .2. E. cinereitm
3b Anthers black ... 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to
densely covered with short setae:
13.19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred
to wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
14 Species treatment in taxonomic papers
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example ( 17.9), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (bold, not italicized) is to be fol-
lowed by its author citation (italicized) and the full liter-
ature reference, with the name of the publication written
out in full (not italicized).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including those
of the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and
year of publication, e.g. C.E.Hubb. in Kew Bulletin 15:
307 (1960); Boris et al.: 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967);
Sims: t. 38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist
of paragraphs commencing, where possible, with itali-
cized leader words such as flowering time, etymology,
diagnostic characters, distribution and habitat.
14.5 When more than one species of a given genus is dealt
with in a paper, the correct name of each species should be
prefixed by a sequential number followed by a full stop.
Infraspecific taxa are marked with small letters, e.g. lb.,
12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written as in 13.6, irrespec-
tive of whether the person in question is cited as the
author of a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is used
for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’ (but see 12.7 for normal text).
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations
of the species in question may be cited in a paragraph
commencing with the word Illustrations followed by a
colon. This paragraph is given after the last paragraph of
the synonymy, see 17.9.
14.9 When new combinations are made, the full litera-
ture reference must be given for the basionym, e.g.:
270
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
Antimima saturata {L.Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann,
comb. nov.
Ruschia saturata L.Bolus in Notes on Mesembrianthemum and
allied genera, part 2: 122 (1929). Mesembryanthemiim atrocinctum
N.E.Br.: 32 (1930). Type: Pillans BOL18952 (BOL. holo.!).
15 Citation of specimens
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should be
given (if available): country (if not in RSA), province, grid
reference (at least for new taxa), locality as given by origi-
nal collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality in
square brackets (if relevant, e.g. Port Natal [now Durban]),
quarter-degree square, date of collection (optional), col-
lector’s name and collecting number (both italicized).
15.2 The abbreviation s.n. (sine numero) is given after
the name of a collector who usually assigned numbers to
his collections but did not do so in the specimen in ques-
tion (see 15. 1 1 ), or the herbarium number can then be
cited with no space between the herbarium and its
number e.g. Marloth SAM691 (see 17.9). The herbaria
in which the relevant type(s) are housed are indicated by
means of the abbreviations given in the latest edition of
Index Herhariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned
first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are
arranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
15.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclamation
mark ( ! ) which of the types have been personally examined.
15.5 If only a photograph or microfiche was seen, write
as follows: Anon. 422 (X, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
15.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for cor-
rect names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lec-
totypify synonyms.
15.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen,
this should be indicated by using the phrase ‘here desig-
nated’ (see 17.9). If reference is made to a previously
selected lectotype or neotype, the name of the designating
author and the literature reference should be given. In
cases where no type was cited, and none has subsequent-
ly been nominated, this may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species and a
few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system: Provinces/coun-
tries (typed in capitals) should be cited in the following
order: Namibia, Botswana, Northern Province (previously
Northern Transvaal), North-West (previously northeastern
Cape and southwestern Transvaal), Gauteng (previously
PWV), Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal), Free
State (previously Orange Free State), Swaziland,
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), Lesotho, and Northern
Cape, Western Cape and Eastern Cape (Figure 1 ).
1 5.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical sequence.
15. 10 Locality records for specimens should preferably
be given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from
the same one-degree square are given in alphabetical
order, i.c (-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the
same quarter-degree square are arranged alphabetically
according to the collectors’ names; the quarter-degree
references must be repeated for each specimen cited.
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in
which a collection was seen should be given in brackets
after the collection number; the codes are separated by com-
mas. The following example will explain the procedure:
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 km E of Nongoma,
(-DD), Reiser 354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe
4789 (BOL, M). 2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB), Smith 234;
Koffiefontein, (-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest
Station, (-CC), Marriot s.n. (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref.
unknown: Sterkstroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all
major works of this nature it is assumed that the author
has investigated the relevant material in all major
herbaria and that he has provided the specimens seen
with determinavit labels. It is assumed further that the
author has submitted distribution maps for all relevant
taxa and that the distribution has been described briefly
in words in the text. Under the heading ‘Vouchers’ no
more than five specimens should be cited, indicating
merely the collector and the collector’s number (both
italicized). Specimens are alphabetically arranged ac-
cording to collector’s name. If more than one specimen
by the same collector is cited, they are arranged numeri-
cally and separated by a comma. The purpose of the cited
specimens is not to indicate distribution but to convey
the author’s concept of the taxon in question.
15.14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed
are indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the lat-
est edition of Index Herhariorum. They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers; Arnold 64 (PRE); Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan 831
(GRA, PRE), 840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe
6161, 6163, 6405 (BOL); Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, they must be
listed together before Acknowledgements under the head-
ing Specimens examined. They are arranged alphabetically
by the collector’s name and then numerically for each col-
lector. The species is indicated in brackets by the number
that was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific taxa
by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with in a
given article, the first species of the first genus mentioned
is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the international
herbarium designation. Note that the name of the collector
and the collection number are italicized:
Acocks 12497 (2.1b) BM. K. PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL. K. P. Archer
1507 (\. 4) BM, G. Burchell 2847 (2.8c) MB, K. Bunmm 2401 (3.3)
MO, S. B.L. Burt! 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
1 6 Synonyms
1 6. 1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of south-
ern Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern
Bothalia31,2 (2001)
271
African origin, or used in southern African literature,
should be included.
16.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg.
after the reference, followed by non with the author and
date, if there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda (nom. mid.) and invalidly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to
cite them, for example if they have been used in promi-
nent publications.
1 6.4 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud., et
al. are not italicized (see 13.5, 14.3, 17.9).
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged
chronologically by basionyms, except for the basionym
of the correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph
directly after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given syn-
onymy it should be abbreviated to the initial, except
where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 13.4).
17 Description and example of species treatment
17.1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should,
where possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality;
underground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be
easily described for the whole plant). Stems/branches. Bark.
Leaves', arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubescence;
blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib: above/below,
texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflorescence', type, shape,
position; bracts/bracteoles, involucral bracts: inner, outer.
Flowers: shape, sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc.
Androecium. Gynoecium. Fruit. Seeds. Flowering time. Chro-
mosome number (reference). Consen’ation stanis. Figure
(word written out in fuU) number.
17.2 Asa mle, shape should be given before measurements.
17.3 In general, if an organ has more than one of the parts
being described, use the plural, otherwise use the singular,
for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.4 Language must be as concise as possible, using
participles instead of verbs.
17.5 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.9.
17.6 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens. A hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables of
a word. e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with no space
between the letter and the stroke. An N-dash (en) is a
longer stroke commonly used instead of the word ‘to’
between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use it between
words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate to lanceo-
late’; it is produced by typing three hyphens next to each
other, or in MS Word the code is alt + 0150. An M-dash
(ern) is a stroke longer than an N-dash and is used various-
ly, e.g. in front of a subspecific epithet instead of the full
species name; it is produced by typing two hyphens next to
one another, or in MS Word the code is alt + 0151.
17.7 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describ-
ing shape, measurements, dimensions, etc. (see 13.12).
17.8 The decimal point replaces the comma in all
units of measurement, e.g. leaves 1.0-1. 5 mm long.
17.9 Example:
1. Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sond.)
T.D.Penn. The genera of Sapotaceae: 252 (1991). Type:
Gauteng, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL,
photo.!).
Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine & Hemsl.: 307
(1960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon; 75 (1980).
Chtysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalis-
montana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: 97 (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958); Justin et
al.: 98 (1973). Types: Angola, Wehvitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here des-
ignated; PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch s.n. (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 ( 1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 39
(1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: without locality and collector [B,
holo.t; Kl, PI, lecto., designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 38 (1958),
PRE!, SI, W!,Z!].
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpl.: 590
(1823); D.Bakker: 167 (1929); H.Fr.: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720 (1968): Palmer: 34 (1969).
Type: Mpumalanga, Tzaneen Dist., Granville in Herb. Pillans K48625
(K, holo.l; G!, P!, PRE!, S!).
B. fragrans auct, non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19 (1915); Henkel:
226 ( 1934); Stapelton: 6 (1954).
Illustrations: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?); Codd: 73
(1964); Palmer; 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves lin-
ear to oblanceolate, 3-10(-23) x 1.0-1. 5(^.0) mm,
obtuse, base broad, half-clasping. Heads heterogamous,
campanulate, 7-8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of axil-
lary shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner
exceeding flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute.
Receptacle nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11 male,
16-21 bisexual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ± 0.75 mm
long, elliptic. Pappus bristles very many, equalling corol-
la, scabridulous. Flowering time: September. Chromo-
some number: 2n = 22. Figure 23B.
18 New taxa
1 8. 1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by
at least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide
full-length Latin descriptions unless they have the
required expertise in Latin at their disposal.
1 8.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa be
accompanied by a good illustration (line drawing or pho-
tograph) and a distribution map.
272
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard, sp. nov., H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatu-
latis), inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinc-
tis, floribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaph-
roditorum aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel
floribus femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitulis
minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta,
mucronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lana-
to- arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata,
3. 5^.0 X 2.5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas
cymosas terminales aggregata; capitula subterminalia
interdum solitaria vel 2 vel 3 ad apices ramulorum nudo-
rum ad 30 mm longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seri-
atae, gradatae, exteriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae,
dorso lanatae, seriebus duabus interioribus subaequal-
ibus et flores quasi aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis
niveis vix radiantibus. Receptacidum fere laeve. Flores ±
35^1. Achenia 0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis praedi-
ta. Pappi setae multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus
scabridis, basibus non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richters-
veld, (-CC), ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stink-
fontein, kloof in hill south of road, annual, disc whitish, 7-
11-1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
2 1 Reprints
Authors receive 100 reprints free. If there is more than
one author, this number will have to be shared between
them.
22 Documents consulted
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide;
Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society, Flora of Australia,
Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, South African
Journal of Botany (including instructions to authors of
taxonomic papers). South African Journal of Science.
23 Address of editor
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XIOI,
Pretoria 0001.
24 FSA contributions
24. 1 Figures and text must conform to Bothalia format.
24.2 These articles will be considered as a full contri-
bution to the Flora of southern Africa and will be listed
as published in the "Plan of Flora of southern Africa',
which appears in all issues of the FSA series.
19 New provinces of South Africa (Oct. 1996)
FIGURE I. — 1, Western Cape; 2, Eastern Cape; 3, Northern Cape; 4,
Free State (previously Orange Free State); 5, KwaZulu-Natal
(previously Natal); 6. North-West (previously northeastern
Cape and southwestern Transvaal); 7, Gauteng (previously
PWV); 8. Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal); 9,
Northern Province (previously Northern Transvaal).
20 Proofs
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the edi-
tor as soon as po.ssible. Do not add any new information.
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4, 13.15, 15.2, 15.14, 16.6
abstract. 2.1, 2.3, 7. 13.2
acknowledgements, 9
address of
authors, 2.3, 4
editor, 23
alphabetical, 6, 10.9. 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Apple Mac, 3.2
Arabic numerals, 11.1, 12.12, 13.13
ASCII, 3.3
author(s), 1.3, 2.1.4, 10.14, 12.14-12.16
address, 2.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 2.3, 10.2, 10.7, 10.9. 10.11, 12.12, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3, 14.6,
15.7
names of plant names, 5, 7.3, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
senior. 10.10
book reviews, 1.1, 2.4
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
Bothalia, 1, 2.2, 11.2, 24.1
brief taxonomic articles, 15.8
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 13.6
c., 13.12, 17.7
ca, 13.12, 17.7
Cape, 15.8, 18.3, 19
capitals, 11.2, 12.5, 12.6, 12.9, 15.8
captions, 2. 1 , 2.4, 2.5,11.2,12.7,12.9,12.11,12.13,12,17
CD, 3.2
CDR file, 3.9
checklist, 1 3.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 17.9
chronological sequence. 10.3, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
of specimens, 15
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
273
cm, 13.11
collection
date. 15.1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2. 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.14
collector, 13.9, 15.1. 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15
colon. 2.13. 14.8
comma. 2.13, 15.3, 15.11. 15.13. 15.14, 17.8
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.6
congress proceedings, 10.14
contents, 8
CorelDraw 3-9, 3.9
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
decimal point, 17.8
description and example of species treatment. 17
determinavit labels, 15.13
diagrams. 12.2
digital submissions of graphics, tables. 11.12
discussion, 2.4. 14.4
diskette. 3. 3.2
distribution maps. 12.18. 12.19, 12.20. 15.13, 18.2
documents consulted, 22
dot maps, 12.18. 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 2.1
space. 2.13, 2.16
drawing paper. 12.2
drawings. 3.7, 12.2
Eastern Transvaal, see Mpumalanga
edition. 13.15
editor, 13.15. 23
editorial
board. 1.4
policy. 1
electronic files, 3.2. 3.8-3.10, 12.2. 12.3
etal., 10.2. 13.5. 14.3, 17.9
example of
new taxa. 18.3
species treatment, 17.9
exclamation mark, 2.13, 15.4
family name, 5. 6.7
fig.. 14.7
figure(s), 12. 14.7, 17.1
digital submissions, 12
reduction of 12.1, 12.2, 12.18
returned. 12.15
file extensions. 3.9, 12.2. 12.3
firewall. 3.3
first author, 10.2
first language, 1.3
flora, 10.14
Flora of southern Africa, 24
footnote. 2.3. 3.4
Free State (previously Orange Free State). 15.8. 19
FSA contributions. 24
full stop. 2.13, 13.15. 13.16. 14.5
GARNOCK-JONES. P.J. & WEBB, C.J 1996. The requirement to
cite authors of plant names in botanical journals. Taxon 45; 285. 286.
13.6
Gauteng (previously PWV), 15.8, 17.9, 19
genera, 13.2
generic name. 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area. 7.2
granting agencies, 2.3
graphics. 3.7
digital submissions. 12
graphs, 3.7, 12.2
grid reference system. 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 3.4, 3.6
sequence of. 2.3, 2.4
herbaria. 15.2, 15.3. 15.11, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code, 15.11
designations, 13.15, 15.15
numbers. 15.2
voucher specimens, 12.11, 13.19
here designated. 15.7, 17.9
holo.. 15.3, 15.5. 17.9, 18.3
holotype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.9
hyphen, 2.10-2.12. 17.6
IBM compatible, 3.4
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations. 12.2, 12.6. 12.16. 14.8, 17.9
previously published. 12.16
image files. 3.8-3.10
indentations, 3.4, 3.6
Index Herbarioriwi, 15.2. 15.14
index of names. 2.4
indices, 13.2
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9. 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10.14
in preparation, 10.14
in press. 10.14
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 13.11
invalidly published names. 16.3
Iomega zip diskette, 3.2
italics, 7.4. 10.12. 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13, 15.15
journals, 10.4. 10.12. 10.14
names of, 10.4, 10.13
justify, 2.8
keys. 2.16. 3.4, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18
keywords, 2.3, 2.4. 6
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), 15.8. 19
language, 1 .3
Latin, 13.5. 16.4
descriptions. 18.1
layout, 2.2
lecto.. 15.6. 15.7, 17.9
lectotype. 15.6. 15.7, 17.9
lettering. 12.5
line
drawings, 2.1, 12.2, 18.2
spacing, 2.1
literature
references, 2.1, 10. 10.7, 14.2, 14.3, 14.8, 14.9
within synonymy, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
locality. 15.1, 15.10
location. 6.7
m. 13.11
magnification of figures, 12.3, 12.9
manuscript
language. 1.3, 17.4
requirements, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2
sequence, 2.3, 2.4
map. distribution, dot. 12.18. 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2, 19
MAPPIT, 12.20
M-dash, 2.12, 17.6
mm. 13.11
margin. 2.1, 2.16, 3.4, 17.1
material, 2.3, 2.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.2, 17.7, 17.8
methods, 2.4, 6.10.3
microfiche. 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.14
monograph, 2.4, 15.13, 16.1
Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal), 15.8, 19
MSWord, 2.7, 2.11, 2.12, 3.5
name(s)
collector's, 15.10
illegitimate, 16.2
invalidly published, 16.3
of author(s), 2.3. 10.2, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 12.12, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3,
14.6. 15.7
of authors of plant names, 5, 7.3, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8. 14.6
of publications, 13.8
Natal, see KwaZulu-Natal, 15.8, 19
N-dash, 2.11, 17.6
274
Bothalia 31,2 (2001)
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4, 14.9
provinces of South Africa (Oct. 1996), 15.8, 19
taxa, 7.4. 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
non-breaking space, 2.7
normal style, 3.1
Northern Province, see Northern Transvaal, 15.8, 19
North-West, 15.8, 19
notes. 1, 2.4
technical, 10.14
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.9
herbarium, 15.2
numbering, 13.13
figures, 12.12, 17.1
keys, 13.16. 13.17
pages, 2.5
taxa, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.12, 13.3
obituaries, 1.1, 2.4, 10.7
optical disk, 3.2
Orange Free State, see Free State, 15.8, 19
page charges, 1.5
paragraghs, 3.6
PC diskettes, 3
pers. comm., 10.5, 10.8
personal communications (pers. comm.), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 2. 1
photograph, 3.7, 12.3, 12.4, 12.13, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 2.1, 12.4, 12.5
plant
collectors, 13.9
name, 5. 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
PRECIS (National Herbarium PREtoria Computerised Information
System), 13.1
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.14
proofs, 20
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8
of South Africa, 15.8, 19
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10.10
year of. 10.9. 14.3
PWV, see Gauteng. 15.8, 19
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 2.15
reduction of figures, 12.1, 12.2, 12.18
referees, 1 .4
reference, 2.4, 10.6, 10.7-10.9, 10.14
figure, 12.8
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
li.st, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 2.1, 10
report, 10.14
reprints, 21
requirements for
diskette, 3
manuscript, 2
results, 2.4
revision, 2.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
rtf file, 3.3
scale bar, 12. 10
semicolon, 2.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 2.3, 2.4
short notes, 1.1, 2.4
space
double, 2.13
non-breaking, 2.7
one, 2.16
special characters, 2.6
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14
specimens examined, 2.4, 15.15
square brackets, 15.1, 17.9
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
stiffy/stiffies, 3.2
style(s), 3.1, 3.4
submission of MS, 1 .2
surnames, 13.10
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 13.8, 14.8, 16.6
t., 14.3, 14.7, 17.9
table(s), 2.1, 2.4, 2.5, II
digital submissions, 1 1
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
tabs, 3.4
taxa
name of, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.11, 12.18, 13.2, 13.6, 13.8, 14
revision, 8
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4
technical note, 10.14
text, 2.1, 3.7, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9, 11.1, 12.7, 12.8, 12.12, 12.14,
13, 15.13, 15.15, 16.4
thesis, 10.14
times sign, 2.14
title, 2.3, 5, 6.9, 6.11
of books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
page, 2.3, 2.5
Transvaal. 15.8, 17.9, 19
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.5, 17.9
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
not designated. 15.7
specimen, 15.1
units of measure, 13.11, 13.15, 17.8
unpublished article, 10.14
voucher(s) specimens, 12.11, 13.19, 15.13, 15.4
Word for Windows, 3.3
World list of scientific periodicals, 10.13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R1 60,00 Other countries US$50.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R310,00 Other countries US$95.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
Colour plates in Bothalia
Price per volume
Vol. 9, 3 & 4: 27 plates of Kniphofia spp. by Cythna Letty and others
Vol. 16,1: Kniphofia splendida by Cythna Letty
Vol. 27,2: Nivenia parviflora by Fay Anderson
Vol. 28,2: Cyrtanthus erubescens by M.E. Connell
Vol. 29,2: Gladiolus rhodanthus by Auriol Batten
Vol. 30,1: Clivia miniata by Barbara Jeppe
SADC: R30.00 / Other: US$12.00
SADC: RIO.OO / Other: US$5.00
SADC: R85.00 / Other: US$25.00
Contents to vols 1-20
by H.F. Glen, B.A. Momberg & E. Potgieter (1991)
A brief history of Bothalia; a list of all papers published: a list of all authors, co-authors, keywords and titles; and tables with
publication dates, major subjects covered and some information on authors.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$7.00
Contents to vols 21-25
by B.A. Momberg & J.M. Mulvenna (1996)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and titles, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$7.00
Contents to vols 26-30
by B.A. Momberg (2000)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and titles, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R18.00 / Other countries US$8.00
Set of aU available issues
up to and including; Volume 30; Contents to Vols 1-20; 21-25; and 26-30; all existing indices.
Price: SADC countries, R500.00 / Other countries, US$200.00
1 he history of the
Botanical Research Institute
by Denise Foui ie
u re|irint of tltis article in Bothalia 28,2 \\'\i\\ un uttrcictive covor
Price: SADC countries, R30.00 / Other countries, US$10.00
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 • Fax. (012) 804-3211 • email: bookshop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za
BOTHALIA
Volume 31,2 Oct. 2001
CONTENTS
1. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 25. A new species in subgenus Ric-
ciella, section RiccieUa. S.M. PEROLD 151
2. Five new species of Erica (Ericaceae) from the Swartberg Range, Western Cape, South Africa
and a note on E. esterhuyseniae. E.G.H. OLIVER and I.M. OLIVER 155
3. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1. The genus Aneura
and its local representative. S.M. PEROLD 167
4. Three new species of Tritoniopsis (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) from the Cape Region of South Africa J.C.
MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 175
5. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Riccardia
and its type species, R. mitltifida, with confirmation of its presence in the region. S.M. PEROLD 183
6. Notes on African plants:
Acanthaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Lamiaceae. New records and distributional disjunctions from South
Africa. Zimbabwe and Mozambique. T.J. EDWARDS, A.J. BEAUMONT and D. STYLES 199
Colchicaceae. A remarkable new species of Androcymbium from Northern Cape, South Africa.
J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 203
Dennstaedtiaceae-Pteropsida. Hypolepis villoso-viscida new to the Flora of southern Africa. J.P.
ROUX 195
Eabaceae. The identity of Melolobium lampolobiim (Papilionoideae) A. MOTEETEE and B-E.
VANWYK 209
Gentianaceae. A new species of Sebaea from the Swartberg Range, Western Cape, South Africa.
I.M. OLIVER and J.B.P. BEYERS 207
Hyacinthaceae. The generic delimitation within Hyacinthaceae, a comment on works by E. Speta.
B. STEDJE 192
Iridaceae. Two new renosterveld species of Crocoideae from South Africa. J.C. MANNING and
PGOLDBLATT 189
Portulacaceae. Talinum paniculatiim, a naturalized weed in South Africa. E.M.A. STEYN and
G.E. SMITH 195
Pteridophyta. New distribution records of southern African Pteridophyta. J.E. BURROWS and
S.M. BURROWS 205
Zamiaceae. Encephalartos relictus: a new species from southern Africa. P.J.H. HURTER and H.E.
GLEN 197
7. Taxonomic significance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in Passerina (Thymelaea-
ceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 213
8. Miscellaneous notes:
Aloaceae. Are ovules and seeds in Lomatophyllum Willd. (Aloe sect. Lomatopliylliim sensu auct.)
anatropous and exarillate? E.M.A. STEYN and G.E. SMITH 237
9. Obituary: Heinrich Johann Wilhelm Giess ( 1910-2000). HERTA KOLB ERG 241
10. Book review 245
1 1 . National Botanical Institute South Africa: administration and research staff, 31 March 2001, publications
I April 2000-31 March 2001. Compiler: B.A. Momberg 247
12. Guide for authors to 265
Abstraclcd. indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Ah.slmcts/RRM • CABS • CABACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Ciirreni Contents. Scisearch. Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: review.s and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
O Published by and obtainable t'roni: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 0001 , South Africa. Tel. (012) 804-3200. Fax (012)
804-32 1 1 . email: bookshop(2’nbipre.nbi.ac.za website: www.nbi,ae,/,;t/pubs. Typesetting and page layout: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction: 4 Images,
P.O. Box 34059. OOlO (ilenstantia, Pretoria. Printing: Afriseot Printers, P.O. Box 75353, Lynnwood Ridge, ()04() Pretoria. Tel (012) 349-2800/1. Fax
(012) 349-2802.