Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 32,1
May 2002
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001, Republic of
South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of
the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is
devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Three booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20, (b) to Vols 21-25 and (c) to Vols 26-30, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenhosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many botanical artists have contributed to
the series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian Condy, Betty Connell, Stella
Gower, Rosemary Holcroft, Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire Linder-
Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased to receive living plants of general interest
or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia
and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the informa-
tion is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. I. Introduction. Dicroidium, 1983, by .I.M. & H.M.
Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium ), 1989, by J.M.
& H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. &
H.M. Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 317, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stemming the Sixth Extinction, 1999,
by J.M. Anderson (ed.)
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 32,1
Scientific Editor: G. Germishuizen
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
Botanical
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
May 2002
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Archer, Mrs C. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Barker, Dr N.P. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA.
Bayer, M.B. 16 Hope St, Gardens, 8001 Cape Town, RSA.
Beyers, Dr J.B.P. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Braggins, Dr J.E. University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Brandham, Dr P.E. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Bredenkamp, Prof. G. University of Pretoria, RSA.
Brown. Dr E. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia.
Bruyns, Dr P. University of Cape Town, RSA.
Burrows, J.E. Buffelskloof Private Nature Reserve, Lydenburg, RSA.
De Kok, Dr R. CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, Australia.
De Silva, Dr P.H.A.U. University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Dreyer, Dr L. University of Stellenbosch, RSA.
Edwards, Dr T.J. University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, RSA.
Ellis, Dr R.P Grassland Research Centre, Agricultural Council, Pretoria, RSA.
Glen, Dr H.F. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Glen, Mrs R.P. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Goldblatt, Dr P. Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA.
Hansen, Dr H.V. University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henderson, Ms L. Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, RSA.
Hilliard, Dr O.M. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Hilu, Dr K.W. Polytechnic & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Killick, Dr D.J.B. 465 Sappers Contour, Lynnwood, 0081 Pretoria, RSA.
Lassen, Dr P. Botanical Museum, Lund, Sweden.
Leistner, Dr O.A. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Lowrey, Dr T.K. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
Manning, Dr J.C. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Midgley, Dr G.F. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Moll, Prof. E.J. University of Queensland, Australia.
Nelson, Dr E.C. Outwell, Wisbech, UK.
Nevling, Dr L. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, USA.
Nilsson, Prof. Dr S. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oliver, Dr E.G.H. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Paterson-Jones, Dr D. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Peckover, R. Pyramid, RSA.
Phillipson, Dr PB. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA.
Poes, Prof. T. Esterhazy College, Eger, Hungary.
Rourke, Dr J.P. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Schutte-Vlok, Dr A. P.O. Box 1512, 6620 Oudtshoorn, RSA.
Scott-Shaw, R. Biodiversity Publications, Cascades, KwaZulu-Natal, RSA.
Stedje, Prof. B. University of Oslo, Norway.
Victor, Ms J.E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Volleson, Dr K. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Wclman, Ms W.E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
CONTENTS
Volume 32,1
1. Clivia mirabilis (Amaryllidaceae: Haemantheae) a new species from Northern Cape, South Africa. J.P.
ROURKE 1
2. The genus Buglossoides (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa. E. RETIEF and A.E. VAN WYK 9
3. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. Riccardia compacta.
S.M. PEROLD 15
4. Revision of the Tarchonanthus camphoratus complex (Asteraceae-Tarchonantheae) in southern Africa.
P.PJ. HERMAN 21
5. Taxonomy of the Passerina fdifonnis L. complex (Thymelaeaceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E.
VAN WYK 29
6. The genus Erica (Ericaceae) in southern Africa: taxonomic notes 1. E.G.H. OLIVER and I.M. OLIVER 37
7. Notes on African plants:
Apocynaceae. A new species of Brachystelma from Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P DOLD .... 71
Campanulaceae. A new species of Merciera from Western Cape. South Africa. C.N. CUPIDO . . 74
Eriospermaceae. Validation of two sectional names in Eriospermum. J. THIEDE 76
Hyacinthaceae. A new combination in Daubenya. J.C. MANNING and A.M. VAN DER MERWE 63
Lamiaceae. New combinations in the genus Rotheca in southern Africa. P.P.J. HERMAN and E.
RETIEF 81
Marsileaceae-Pteropsida. First report of the genus Pilularia from continental Africa. J.P. ROUX 82
Thymelaeaceae. Systematics of Passerina truncata and a new subspecies monticola. C.L. BRE-
DENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 65
Thymelaeaceae. A new species of Passerina from Western Cape, South Africa. C.L. BREDEN-
KAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 76
Thymelaeaceae. A new species of Gnidia from the Knersvlakte, Western Cape, South Africa.
J.B.P. BEYERS 79
8. The taxonomic significance of trichome type and distribution in Melolobium (Fabaceae). A. MOTEE-
TEE, B-E. VAN WYK and PM. TILNEY 85
9. Pollen morphology and biometry of the genus Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) in southern Africa: taxono-
mic and biogeographic considerations. N. MEMBRIVES, J. MARTIN, J. CAUJAPE-CASTELLS
and J. PEDROLA-MONFORT 91
10. Biogeography of Oxalis (Oxalidaceae) in South Africa: a preliminary study. K.C. OBERLANDER, L.L.
DREYER and K.J. ESLER 97
11. A checklist of the plants of Mahwaqa Mountain, KwaZulu-Natal. E.B. METER, T.J. EDWARDS, M.A.
RENNIE and J.E. GRANGER 101
12. Preliminary DNA fingerprinting of the turf grass Cynodon dactylon (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). R.
ROODT. J.J. SPIES and T.H. BURGER 117
13. Miscellaneous notes:
Poaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 16. Polyploidy in the genus Ehrharta. J.J. SPIES,
M.M. VAN DYK and S.M.C. VAN WYK 123
14. Obituary: Anna Amelia Obermeyer-Mauve (1907-2001). H.F. GLEN 127
15. Book review 131
New species, subspecies, sections, name, status and combinations in
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Brachystelma cummingii A.P.Dold, sp. nov., 71
Clivia mirabilis Rourke, sp. nov.. 1
Daubenya inarginata ( Willd . ex Kunth) J.C. Manning & A.M.van cler Merwe, comb, nov., 65
Erica abietina subsp. atrorosea E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv ., subsp. nov., 50
Erica abietina subsp. aurantiaca E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 51
Erica abietina subsp. constantiana E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 51
Erica abietina subsp. diabolis E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv ., subsp. nov., 51
Erica abietina subsp. perfoliosa E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 52
Erica abietina subsp. petraea E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 53
Erica banksii subsp. comptonii ( Salter ) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., stat. et comb, nov., 44
Erica banksii subsp. purpurea (Andrews) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., stat. et comb, nov., 43
Erica baueri subsp. gouriquae E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 46
Erica coccinea subsp. uniflora E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 39
Erica filipendula subsp. parva E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 47
Erica intermedia subsp. albiflora E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 41
Erica melastonia subsp. minor E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 40
Erica petrusiana E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., sp. nov., 58
Erica plukenetii subsp. bredensis E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 41
Erica plukenetii subsp. breviflora ( Dulfer ) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv. , stat. et comb, nov., 43
Erica plukenetii subsp. lineata (Benth.) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 43
Erica plukenetii subsp. penicellata (Andrews) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 42
Erica regia subsp. mariae ( Guthrie & Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 54
Erica viridiflora subsp. primulina (Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 44
Erica viridiflora subsp. redacta E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 45
Erica viscaria subsp. gallorum (L.Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 56
Erica viscaria subsp. longifolia (Bauer) E.G.H.Oliv & I.M.Oliv, comb, et stat. nov., 56
Erica viscaria subsp. macrosepala E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, stat. et nom. nov., 56
Erica viscaria subsp. pendula E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 58
Erica viscaria subsp. pustulata (H. A. Baker) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, stat. et comb, nov., 58
Eriospermum [subgenus Cyathiflorum] section Cyathiflorum P.L. Perry ex Thiede, sect, nov., 76
Eriospermum [subgenus Ligulatum] section Ligulatum PL.Perry ex Thiede, sect, nov., 76
Gnidia pedunculata Beyers , sp. nov., 79
Merciera tetraloba C.N.Cupido, sp. nov., 74
Passerina filiformis subsp. glutinosa ( Thoday ) Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, stat. nov., 33
Passerina montivagus Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, sp. nov., 34
Passerina nivicola Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, sp. nov., 77
Passerina truncata (Meisn.) Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, stat. nov., 66
Passerina truncata subsp. monticola Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, subsp. nov., 69
Rotheca caerulea (N.E.Br.) P.P..I. Herman & Retief, comb, nov., 81
Rotheca cuneiformis (Moldenke) PP.J. Herman & Retief, comb, nov., 81
Rotheca louwalbertsii (PP.J. Herman) PP.J. Herman & Retief, comb, nov., 81
Rotheca pilosa (H. Pearson) PP.J. Herman & Retief, comb, nov., 81
Rotheca uncinata ( Schinz ) PP.J. Herman & Retief, comb, nov., 81
Tarchonanthus littoralis PP.J. Herman, sp. nov., 22
Tarchonanthus parvicapitulatus PP.J. Herman, sp. nov., 26
iv
Bothalia 32,1: 1-7 (2002)
Clivia mirabilis (Amaryllidaceae: Haemantheae) a new species from
Northern Cape, South Africa
J.P. ROURKE*
Keywords: Amaryllidaceae, arid Mediterranean climate, Clivia Lindl., new species. Northern Cape
ABSTRACT
Clivia mirabilis Rourke is a new pendulous tubular-flowered species from Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve in Northern
Cape. Its distribution area is some 800 km outside the previously accepted range of the genus Clivia. This sun-tolerant
species is adapted to an arid Mediterranean climate, producing vegetative growth in winter and maturing its seeds rapidly
in late summer/early autumn to synchronize with the arrival of winter rains.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Clivia Lindl., consisting of four currently
recognized species, C. nobilis Lindl. (1828), C. miniata
(Lindl.) Regel, C. gardenii Hook. (1856) and C. caulescens
R. A. Dyer (1943), is presently considered to be endemic
to southern Africa (Vorster & Smith 1994; Snijman 2000).
These species occur in coastal and inland Afromontane
forest from Eastern Cape through KwaZulu-Natal,
Swaziland and Mpumalanga to the Soutpansberg in
Northern Province. Rumours of the occurrence of Clivia
in Mozambique have not yet been confirmed by accu-
rately localized herbarium collections.
Clivia is an evergreen, rhizomatous genus in the
Amaryllidaceae, characterized by distichous strap-
shaped leaves, umbellate solid scapes and red subglobose
berries containing one to few cartilaginous, pearly-white
seeds embedded in soft yellow pulp.
In February 2001 material of a further species was
submitted to the Compton Herbarium for identification
in a batch of herbarium specimens from the Oorlogskloof
Nature Reserve near Nieuwoudtville, in Northern Cape,
collected by the nature conservation officer in charge, Mr
Wessel Pretorius. The author confirmed this astonishing
discovery during a site visit to Oorlogskloof on 22
February 2001 when two fruiting populations were
examined. The new species is here described as Clivia
mirabilis. Rarely can such an extravagant epithet as
mirabilis be confidently applied, yet in the case of this
extraordinary Clivia , so unusual in its distribution and
characters, its usage seems entirely appropriate.
Clivia mirabilis Rourke , sp. nov., a speciebus
affinibus, corollis actinomorphis rectis tubularibus bicol-
oribus (miniatis/luteis); pedicellis cemuis, 22^40 mm
longis, miniatis per anthesin (demum viridibus post
anthesin); foliis lineamentis medianis albis et apicibus
acutis, distinguitur.
*Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont.
MS. received: 2002-01-25.
Rhizoma perenne solitarium, erectum; caespite folio-
rum 0.6-1. 2 m alto. Folia disticha, rigida, erecta,
0.6-1. 2 m longa, 30-50 mm lata, glabra, coriacea, linea-
mentis medianis albis; margines cartilagineae,
plerumque laeves, interdum leviter scabra; apices acuti.
Scapus 300-800 mm longus, carmineus, late ancipitius.
Inflorescentia umbellata, 20-48 floribus; spathae 5-7,
cymbiformi-acutae, papyraceae, 35-50 mm longae,
10-15 mm latae. Pedicelli cernui, graciles, 25-40 mm
longi, miniati per anthesin, abrupte viridescentes post
anthesin. Perianthium rectum, tubulosum, 35-50 mm
longum, dilatatum versus orem; miniatum sed viride ad
apicem per anthesin, tandem flavescens distale. Antherae
6, basifixae, leviter exsertae; filamenta 30 mm longa,
basaliter adpressa circa stylum. Stylus 40-45 mm longus,
trilobatus; apices subtiliter penicillati. Ovarium
ovoideum, nitidum, miniatum per anthesin; viride post
anthesin; loculi 3-4-ovulati. Baccae pendentes, irregu-
lariter ovoideae, glebulosae; ( 1 )2— 5(— 7) semina conti-
nentes, pericarpium maturum scarlatinum. Semina irreg-
ulariter ovoidea, ± 10 mm in diam., alba.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 3119 (Calvinia): Nieuwoudt-
ville, Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve, eastern margin of
Oorlogskloof Canyon at Agterstevlei Farm, (-AC), ±
900 m, 18-10-2001, J.P. Rourke 2220 (NBG, holo.; BOL,
K, MO, NSW, PRE, iso.).
Stout, rhizomatous, solitary, evergreen perennial,
0.6-1. 2 m tall; stem reduced to a vertical rhizome, up to
250 mm long terminating in a tuft of leaves. Root system
massive, up to 0.7 m diam., horizontally spreading; roots
perennial, very stout, fleshy, up to 20 mm diam., outer
surface covered in a corky, velamen-like layer. Leaf
sheath prominent, flushed deep carmine (RHS 183A
greyed-purple). Leaves long-lived, stiffly erect, disti-
chous, strap-shaped, 0.6-1. 2 m long, 30-50 mm wide,
flattened to slightly V-shaped with a distinct pale whitish
grey striation in the midrib area on upper surface, stria-
tion becoming less distinct in older leaves, coriaceous,
glabrous, deep dull green, flushed carmine-maroon at
base, apex obtuse-acute; margins entire, cartilaginous,
usually smooth, occasionally irregularly scabrous,
becoming slightly revolute in old, mature leaves. Scape
2
Bothalia32,l (2002)
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
3
300-800 mm long, broadly ancipitous, longitudinally
ridged, 10-14 mm wide, glabrous, carmine-flushed.
Inflorescence umbel-like, 20-48-flowered, subtended by
5-7 brownish/carmine, papyraceous spathe valves, nar-
rowly cymbiform-acute, 35-50 x 10-15 mm; pedicels droop-
ing, slender, 25-40 x 1 .2 mm, orange-red, abruptly turn-
ing green in post-pollination phase. Perianth straight to
imperceptibly curved, tubular, becoming progressively
flared towards apex, 35-50 x 5 mm below ovary, 10-12 mm
diam. at mouth, orange-red (RHS 32B) proximally,
green-tipped (RHS 145A) distally on opening, the green
changing to yellow (RHS 22B) distally, entire perianth
becoming deep orange-red (RHS 33A) after anthesis;
tepals fused distally to form a tube 10-15 mm long, outer
tepals narrowly oblong, apices acute, inner tepals slight-
ly wider, apices obtuse, outwardly flared. Stamens 6,
dorsifixed, 2 mm long, very slightly exserted at anthesis;
filaments 30 mm long, attached to tepals 10 mm above
ovary; inwardly bowed proximally, adpressed around
style at point of attachment forming a 10 mm long nec-
tar well above ovary. Ovary ovoid, shiny, greenish yel-
low in bud, becoming orange-red at anthesis, changing to
bright green in post-pollination phase; ovules 3 or 4 in
each locule; style 40-45 mm long, terete, glabrous,
tapering distally, included at anthesis, later elongating
and becoming exserted 5-8 mm in post-pollination
phase; stigma trilobed, lobes 0.4— 1.0 mm long, penicil-
late at apex. Fruiting heads with 25-35 pendent berries.
Berries irregularly oblong to ovoid, 10-30 x 10-15 mm,
glebulose to submoniliform, often narrowed to a distinct
neck above pedicel, apex often tapering to an eccentri-
cally angled beak, containing ( 1 )2 — 4(— 7) gongyloid
seeds projecting prominently and irregularly through
thin pericarp; pericarp glossy, pale apple green, maturing
through yellow, orange to pinkish red; mature berries red
(RHS 40B eventually becoming RHS 45B). Seeds some-
what ovoid, slightly faceted, ± 10 mm diam., pearly
white; embryo green. (Colour references according to
Royal Horticultural Society colour chart.) Figure 1; Plates
1 & 2.
Diagnostic characters
Clivia mirabilis is distinguished by its straight, actin-
omorphic, bicolored (orange/yellow) tubular corolla,
long drooping pedicels, 25^-0 mm long, that are orange-
red at anthesis and green when fruiting; the distinctive
single median white striation on the upper surface of the
leaves with smooth cartilaginous margins; and irregular-
ly shaped glebulose-gongyloid berries. The basal part of
the leaves forming the leaf sheath is flushed a deep
carmine maroon, unlike any other Clivia except
C. nobilis, which occasionally produces similarly
coloured leaf bases. The orange-red coloration of the
pedicels in this species during anthesis is a unique char-
acter in the genus Clivia.
Distribution and habitat
Apparently confined to the Oorlogskloof Nature
Reserve in Northern Cape (Figure 2), Clivia mirabilis is
restricted to a small area on the eastern margin of the
Oorlogskloof Canyon. Populations are known to occur
just north of Eland se Kliphuis adjacent to Agterstevlei
Farm and a little further south around the Driefontein
Waterfall. The distance between these sites is ± 5 km.
The species also occurs at a few sites between these two
localities.
The margins of the Oorlogskloof Canyon are capped
with 30 m cliffs of Peninsula Formation Sandstone. This
has eroded to form coarse sandstone talus screes below
the cliffs that are partly covered in a light woodland of
relictual Afromontane evergreen forest elements, princi-
pally Olea europaea subsp. africana , Maytenus acumi-
nata, M. oleoides, Cassine schinoides, Halleria lucida
and Podocarpus elongatus with additional shade provid-
ed by outsize, (4 m tall) specimens of Phylica oleaefolia.
Small groups of C. mirabilis grow rooted in humus
between cracks in the sandstone talus of the rock scree,
either as solitary individuals or in small groups.
Occasionally some clumps occur in full sun but these
tend to have shorter leaves and often show signs of water
stress (dried leaf tips). However, the remaining leaves
show no signs of sunburn, despite the intense insolation
experienced for several months each year. The main pop-
ulation extends over several hectares and probably con-
sists of well over 1 000 individuals. Due to the position
of these two sites under the eastern cliffs of Oorlogskloof
Canyon, most plants experience shade until about mid-
morning after which they are in direct sun.
The area is characterized by a semi-arid Mediter-
ranean climate with a strictly winter rainfall regime —
exactly the opposite climatic conditions experienced by
the other four species in this genus. The mean annual
rainfall for Oorlogskloof is 414 mm, falling mainly
between May and September. Vegetative growth is thus
restricted to a brief winter growing period. Situated at
850-900 m, some 100 km inland from the coast, these
populations are subject to brief but light frost in winter.
MORPHOLOGY AND BIOLOGY
Root system
On excavating several plants in the habitat for culti-
vation at Kirstenbosch, the enormous root system char-
acteristic of this species was revealed. Large adult plants
have a mass of fleshy, succulent roots radiating between
V 2 — 3/ 4 m from the base of the rhizome, each root ± 20 mm
in diameter. This disproportionally large volume of sub-
PLATE 1. — Clivia mirabilis. A, inflorescence in habitat showing orange/red pedicels; B, plants in habitat between Peninsula Formation Sandstone
boulders; C, leaves showing prominent median white stripe on upper surface and variation in dimensions. D, E, fruiting head: D, immature
berries; E, mature berries. F, seedlings five months after germination, note large radicle and prominent carmine pigmentation on cotyledon
and at base of first pair of leaves. Photos; C. Paterson-Jones.
4
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 1 . — Clivia mirabilis: A,
mature inflorescence; B,
fruiting head with irregularly
shaped berries; C, longitudi-
nal section through flower;
note filament bases
adpressed to style forming
nectar reservoir; D, detail of
filament bases. Scale bars: 10
mm. Artist; John Manning.
terranean biomass gives mature plants an extensive water
storage capacity, allowing them to survive the prolonged
rainless summers of the Oorlogskloof environment.
Flower colour, development and pollination
The general impression of a fully open scape is of
bicoloured perianths, orange-red at the base, yellow
towards the mouth and with orange-red pedicels. During
the development of the flower, both perianth and ovary
progress through a series of well-marked colour changes.
The unopened bud is yellowish, but prominently green-
tipped, and the ovary is also pale green. At anthesis the
green coloration slowly disappears from the tips of the
tepals which take on the same yellow tones as the basal
half of the perianth. The pedicels and upper half of the
perianth are deep orange-red at this stage. After pollina-
tion the yellow coloration disappears and the whole peri-
anth and ovary take on a uniform orange/red colour. As
the perianth begins to wither, the ovary swells and under-
goes an abrupt colour change from orange to bright
green, as do the pedicels. No other Clivia has pedicels
the same colour as the perianth when the flower is fully
open. The pedicels abruptly change to green as the peri-
anth abscisses and the ovary swells in the post-pollina-
tion phase.
The purpose of these colour changes is not yet under-
stood, but is probably related to pollinator cues.
Pollination appears to be by sunbirds. A single sighting
of a malachite sunbird probing the perianths was made at
Oorlogskloof on 18 October 2001 suggesting that sun-
birds could be involved in pollen transfer. However, like
the other three tubular-flowered species, C. mirabilis
may also be a selfer as between 80 and 90% of the flow-
ers in each umbel are pollinated and produce viable
berries. Flowering time : ± six weeks, from October to
mid-November.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
5
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of C. mirabilis, 9. in relation to the distrib-
ution of the remainder of the genus Clivia (black shaded area).
Fruiting
The berries mature more rapidly than in the other
Clivia species. By the end of February, four months after
flowering, the fully developed berries turn from yellow
and orange to pinkish and later red by the end of March
and are shed shortly thereafter prior to the onset of the
first winter rains in April/May. This rapid autumn matu-
ration of berries is in sharp contrast to the summer rain-
fall area clivias which mature slowly, usually 12 months
for C. miniata and C. gardenii, about nine months for
C. caulescens and C. nobilis (Duncan 1999) to coincide
with the commencement of October/November summer
rains.
Seed dispersal and germination
Berries commence falling from late February to early
April. Germination appears to be rapid in response to the
onset of autumn/early winter rains. At Kirstenbosch
seeds sowed on 18 March 2001 had already developed a
10 mm radicle by 10 April 2001.
On germinating, the primary root develops into a
swollen, white, succulent cylinder up to 50 x 5-6 mm.
During the moist winter months (May-September), it
swells, accumulating water in its succulent tissue. By
October, two short (5-10 mm long) leaves have been
produced, whereafter further vegetative growth of the
seedling slows or largely ceases with the onset of sum-
mer dormancy (November-April). During the rainless
phase of ± six months the seedling survives on water
reserves stored in the greatly enlarged primary root.
Vegetative growth commences again in autumn. Thus the
biology of a C. mirabilis seedling in its first year is much
akin to a winter rainfall area geophyte with the swollen
primary root being functionally equivalent to a corm or
bulb.
The phenology of the germinating seed described
above is clearly an adaptation to a semi-arid Mediter-
ranean climatic regime — exactly the reverse of the sum-
mer rainfall region Clivia species.
Within a few months of germinating, the plumular
bud (cotyledon plus first true leaf) (Boyd 1932),
becomes densely pigmented with anthocyanins (Plate
IF). This prominent development of anthocyanins at the
base of the leaves is later evident in the leaf sheaths of
adult plants which are heavily suffused with purple-
carmine pigments. Why the seedlings of C. mirabilis are
so densely pigmented with anthocyanins is not clear, but
it may be a response to the intense levels of sunlight
experienced in the natural habitat, thereby providing
effective screening during the seedlings’ critical estab-
lishment phase.
Relationships
The distribution ranges of all four previously known
Clivia species are contiguous or overlap, while at many
localities different pairs of species occur sympatrically,
C. nobilis with C. miniata , C. gardenii with C. miniata ,
and C. caulescens with C. miniata. Geographically, pop-
ulations of C. nobilis in Eastern Cape, though more than
800 km distant, are the closest spatially to C. mirabilis.
C. nobilis also appears to be the closest relative to
C. mirabilis on morphological grounds: tough stiffly
erect coriaceous leaves with a median pale striation on
the upper surface (some populations of C. nobilis occa-
sionally have a faint median striation), and the small
seeds.
Phytogeographic implications
Palynological evidence indicates that in Western Cape
and southern Namaqualand, subtropical forests were pre-
sent during Miocene and Pliocene times (± 5.3 million
years BP) (Scott etal. 1997). Since then, apart from more
recent cyclical changes in the Quaternary, there has been
a progressive eastward retreat of these forest elements.
Assuming that the genus Clivia has not changed its
dependence on a forest environment significantly since
pre-Quaternary times, it can be argued that the
Nieuwoudtville species is relictual and that its survival in
the Oorlogskloof Canyon is partly fortuitous and partly
due to its adaptation to a different climate. The berry
maturation period, seedling and germination biology are
so perfectly in harmony with an arid Mediterranean cli-
matic regime that Clivia mirabilis is able to survive envi-
ronmental conditions inimical to all other Clivia species.
It is currently believed that the late Miocene also saw
the development of a Mediterranean climate in the west-
ern part of the Cape (Axelrod & Raven 1978). This
would have interrupted the further spread of an essen-
tially summer rainfall genus like Clivia into the forests of
the southern and western part of the Cape. It would also
have left the precursors of Clivia mirabilis to adapt to
increasing aridification and the onset of a pronounced
Mediterranean type climate. Thus if C. mirabilis evolved
from forms with an essentially summer rainfall phenolo-
gy, the adaptation to an arid Mediterranean type climate
is a derived condition dating from late Miocene times.
Long distance dispersal should also be considered as
a possible explanation for this bizarre distribution pat-
tern, but this seems highly unlikely as no living vectors
6
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
for the long-distance dispersal of Clivia seed have yet
been identified nor has biotic dispersal been recorded for
any other species of Amaryllidaceae (Meerow & Snijman
1998). Birds are probably the main seed dispersal vec-
tors. Clivia miniata, C. gardenii and C. caidescens have
all been observed by the author growing epiphytically in
forest trees, five or more metres above ground level. It is
probable that frugivorous birds deposited seeds in these
positions, leading one to postulate that forest dwelling
birds are responsible for the dispersal of large scarlet
Clivia berries. While the dispersal of Clivia seed by birds
between closely adjacent forest patches is a strong possi-
bility, dispersal over distances of 800 km of arid country
seems highly unlikely.
Conservation status
No populations are known outside the Oorlogskloof
Nature Reserve where the species currently enjoys max-
imum protection. Yet there is no reason why C. mirabilis
should not occur further down the Oorlogskloof Canyon,
outside the reserve, as numerous suitable habitats occur
there. If this proves to be the case, special efforts will
have to be made to protect these populations as the
species’ horticultural potential will render it vulnerable to
exploitation.
Other material examined
NORTHERN CAPE.— 3119 (Calvinia): Oorlogskloof Nature
Reserve, (-AC). 10-1 1-2000, W. Pretorius 651 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am most grateful to the Northern Cape Department
of Nature and Environmental Conservation for granting
permission to collect the type material of this species;
also to Wessel Pretorius, officer in charge of the
Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve for his generous assistance
in the field. Colin Paterson Jones patiently photographed
various stages in the life history of C. mirabilis and John
Manning skilfully prepared the line drawings reproduced
here. Dee Snijman and John Manning provided critical
comments on early drafts of the manuscript. I thank all of
them for their invaluable assistance.
Auriol Batten’s fine painting of C. mirabilis was pre-
pared from the type material. I am especially grateful to
her for loaning this plate to the National Botanical
Institute for reproduction in this paper.
REFERENCES
AXELROD, D.I. & RAVEN, P.H. 1978. Late Cretaceous and Tertiary
vegetation history of Africa. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography
and ecology of southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
BOYD, L. 1932. Monocotyledonous seedlings. Morphological studies
in the post-seminal development of the embryo. Transactions
and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 31 : 57,
58.
DUNCAN, G. 1999. Grow clivias. Kirstenbosch Gardening Series,
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.
DYER, R.A. 1943. Clivia caulescens. The Flowering Plants of South
Africa 23: t. 891 .
HOOKER, W.J. 1856. Clivia gardenii. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine', t.
4895.
LINDLEY, J. 1828. Clivia nobilis. Edward's Botanical Register, t.
1182.
MEEROW, A.W. & SNIJMAN, D.A. 1998. Amaryllidaceae. In K.
Kubitzki, The families and genera of vascular plants 3: 83-1 10.
Springer, Berlin.
SCOTT, L„ ANDERSON, H.M. & ANDERSON, J.M. 1997. Vegetation
history. In R.M. Cowling et at. Vegetation of southern Africa.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 2000. Amaryllidaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants
of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 570-576.
National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
VORSTER, P. & SMITH, C. 1994. Clivia nobilis. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 53: t. 2094.
PLATE 2. — Clivia mirabilis, x 0.75, showing flowering and fruiting scapes against a background depicting Oorlogskloof Canyon. A fully open
inflorescence on left shows the red/yellow colour pattern. A younger inflorescence with green tipped perianths is on its right. From the type
collection, Rourke 2220. Artist: Auriol Batten.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
7
Bothalia 32.1 : 9-13 (2002)
The genus Buglossoides (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa
E. RETIEF* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: Boraginaceae. Boraginoideae. Buglossoides Moench. Lithospermeae, nutlets, pollen, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The genus Buglossoides Moench, a member of the family Boraginaceae, subfamily Boraginoideae. tribe Lithospermeae,
is revised for the Flora of southern Africa (FSA) region. Buglossoides comprises about seven species of annual, biennial or
perennial herbs and subshrubs native to Asia, southern Europe and northern Africa. B. arvensis (L.) I.M.Johnst., a natural-
ized weed in many parts of the world, is the only member of the genus represented in the flora of southern Africa, presum-
ably introduced with imported cereal seed. Although the similar polyaperturate pollen grains of Buglossoides and
Lithospermum support the view that they are congeneric, they are retained as separate entities here. Diagnostic characters,
a full description, various illustrations and a distribution map of B. arvensis in southern Africa are given.
INTRODUCTION
In 1794 Moench established the genus Buglossoides
(Boraginaceae/Boraginoideae/Lithospermeae), separat-
ing it from the closely related genus Lithospermum L.
Ever since, the generic status of Buglossoides has been a
matter of controversy. De Candolle (1846), Boissier
(1879), Giirke (1897), Wright (1904), Riedl (1967) and
Mabberley (1997) regarded the genus as congeneric with
Lithospermum , not accepting or unaware of Moench's
view. In 1954 Johnston published a taxonomic revision
of Buglossoides. He used the corolla throat, decorated
inside with five well-developed vertical lines of hairs, to
distinguish Buglossoides from Lithospermum , which is
characterized by a corolla throat lacking these hairs but
bearing localized faucal appendages or groups of stipi-
tate glands. Buglossoides was accepted by various
authors like Ingram (1958), Fernandes (1972),
Edmondson (1978), Qaiser (1979). Brummitt ( 1992), Al-
Shehbaz (1991), Verdcourt (1991), Herman (1993),
Retief & Herman (1997), Lebrun & Stork (1997) and
Retief (2000), and this view is also taken here.
Buglossoides is a genus of about seven species, dis-
tributed primarily in the European portion of the
Mediterranean region and in adjacent southeastern Asia,
with a single species indigenous to China, Korea and
Japan (Al-Shehbaz 1991). B. arvensis (L.) I.M.Johnst. is
the only member of the genus represented in the flora of
southern Africa, scattered across the region. B. arvensis
most probably reached southern Africa with imported
cereal seed. It is widespread as a naturalized weed in
many parts of the world. As yet it is not known from the
Flora zambesiaca region, but is recorded in Tanzania and
North Africa. Fernandes (1971, 1972) reduced three
Buglossoides species to subspecies of B. arvensis. How-
* National Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101.
0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-06-18.
ever, typically B. arvensis differs from these taxa in its
infundibuliform corolla (not hypocrateriform), a calyx
that usually equals or exceeds the corolla tube in flower
(not with calyx distinctly shorter) and in its distribution
(not confined to the Mediterranean region). It is here re-
cognized as a separate species. One of the three species
concerned, B. sibthorpianum Griseb., is regarded as con-
specific with B. arvensis by Edmondson (1978) and
Qaiser (1979).
De Candolle ( 1846) already cited Burchell 1686 under
Lithospermum arvense L. Burchell collected his speci-
men at Kloof village in the Asbestos Mountains,
Northern Cape in 1811. Wright (1904) in his revision of
Lithospermum in Flora capensis cited several localities
in South Africa where 'L. arvense' had been collected.
Bolus & Wolley-Dod (1904) also mentioned the occur-
rence of Buglossoides arvensis because Wolley-Dod had
collected it at a few places on the Cape Peninsula.
Although Wright (1904) and Ross (1972) cited Gerrard
230 for KwaZulu-Natal, B. arvensis is not recently
recorded from the region.
In this paper, diagnostic characters, a full description,
various illustrations and a distribution map of Buglos-
soides arvensis in southern Africa are given. The descrip-
tion is based exclusively on local collections. This paper
forms part of a revision of tha Boraginaceae for the Flora
of southern Africa (FSA) which is currently in progress.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Herbarium specimens of Buglossoides arvensis
housed in BM, BOL. E, GRA. K. NBG. NH, NMB. NU,
PRE, PRU and SAM were studied to assess morpholog-
ical variation as well as phenological and distributional
attributes. Acetolysis of pollen followed the standard
method of Erdtman (1960). For scanning electron micro-
scope studies, samples were coated with gold and stud-
ied with an 1SI-SX-25 SEM. Measurements of pollen
grains were taken with the light microscope from acetol-
ysed grains mounted in glycerine jelly.
10
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
FIGURE 1. — Buglossoides arvensis. A-C, rigid setae: A, on calyx lobes; B. on upper leaf surface; C, basal part. D, E: inner corolla; D, lines of
hairs; E, close up of hairs and pollen grains. F, part of annulus and pollen grains; G, nutlet; H, I, rugose, tuberculate nutlet surface. A-E,
H. I. Acocks 17740 ; F. Acocks 19035', G, Acocks 17805. Scale bars: 10 mm. A, 122 pm: B, 190 pm: C, 492 pm; D. 130 pm; E, 36 pm; F,
71 pm; G, 528 pm; H. 269 pm; I. 59 pm.
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF TAXONOMIC
SIGNIFICANCE
Macromorphology
Species of Buglossoides are divided into two groups:
perennials with corollas 12-20 mm long, nutlets smooth
or punctate-reticulate, white or yellowish and shiny, and
annuals with corollas up to 10 mm long, nutlets tubercu-
late, brownish or greyish and not shiny. B. arvensis
belongs to the latter group. The species is distinguished
from others in the genus by its calyx with a whitish indu-
mentum and by the calyx lobes which are strongly
accrescent in fruit, narrow, acute and covered with long,
rigid setae (Figure I A) and hairs (Leistner 2000: 759).
The indumentum of the leaves is appressed-setulose
with rigid setae, and the multicellular bases of the setae
are 1 -layered (Figure IB, C). B. arvensis is distinguished
from all species of Lithospermum, and from all other
southern African representatives of Boraginaceae, by a
combination of the following characters: five longitudi-
nal bands of hairs extending from the base of the corolla
lobe downwards to the tips of the anthers, as is typical for
the genus (Figure ID, E); an annulus of scale-like lobes
present near the base of the corolla tube (Figure IF); and
nutlets that are rugose and tuberculate (Figure 1G-I).
Pollen
Pollen of Buglossoides arvensis is isopolar and pro-
late, with P = 12.5-18.8 pm and E = 8.3-12.6 pm. In
equatorial view, the grains are rectangular to elliptic,
with the long sides more or less straight and the poles
convex, but frequently collapsing inwards (Figure 2A,
B). Ectoapertures are positioned at the equator, rhombic
in outline, regularly granular and the margins are not
thickened. Endoapertures are situated on or near the
equator and are ± oval and lalongate. The tectum is psi-
late. Orbicules are present.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 2. — Buglossoides cirvensis. A. pollen grains; B, pollen grain with collapsed poles; C, granular aperture and psilate tectum. All grains ace-
tolysed. A. Acocks 17805: B, C. Acocks 17740. Scale bars: 10 mm. A, 4 pm; B. 2 pm; C, 1 pm.
The polyaperturate pollen grains of Buglossoides,
similar to those of Lithospermum, support the merging of
these genera. In their studies on pollen. Clarke (1977)
and Diez et al. (1986) accepted Buglossoides as a sepa-
rate genus. Ahn & Lee (1986), in a palynotaxonomical
study of the Korean Boraginaceae, did not accept
Buglossoides. Johnston (1954) divided the genus into
two sections and concluded that the pollen of section
Eubuglossoides (e.g. B. arvensis) is isopolar, whereas
pollen of section Margarospermum (e.g. B. purpuro-
caerulea (L.) I.M.Johnst. ) is heteropolar and shows simi-
larity to pollen of Lithospermum. Pollen morphology
thus suggests that whereas the section Margarospermum
can perhaps be included in Lithospermum, members of
the section Eubuglossoides are from Lithospermum and
best retained in Buglossoides. The white, smooth, shiny
nutlets of Buglossoides purpurocaerulea similar to those
of Lithospermum afromontanum Weim., for example, as
opposed to the rugose, tuberculate ones of B. arvensis,
support Ahn & Lee's (1986) view. Heterostyly is absent
in B. an’ensis and a vast amount of pollen is released on
to the corolla and between the lines of hairs (Figure
1D-F).
Pollen of southern African Boraginaceae is classified
into seven pollen types (Retief & Van Wyk 1999). Two
genera Lobostemon and Echiostachys, mainly confined
to Western Cape of South Africa, and the two species of
Echium introduced into southern Africa, are often
regarded as belonging to the tribe Lithospermeae in the
subfamily Boraginoideae (Johnston 1954). The triapertu-
rate, heterocolpate pollen grains with a reticulate tectum
found in these genera are very different from those of
Buglossoides and Lithospermum. which are polyapertu-
rate with a psilate tectum. Palynology supports the recog-
nition of a separate tribe, Echieae, for Lobostemon,
Echiostachys and Echium.
Buglossoides Moench, Methodus plantas horti
botanici et agri marburgensis: 418 (1794); R.Fern.: 87
(1972); Al-Shehbaz: 129 (1991); Verde.: 79 (1991);
Retief: 180 (2000). Type: B. tenuiflora (L.f.) I.M.Johnst.
Lithospermum L.: 132 (1753), pro parte.
The genus name is derived from Buglossum Miller,
the name of a genus now reduced to a section of Anchusa
L., and eidos = appearance, alluding to the superficial
resemblance of the two genera; the name Buglossum is
derived from the Greek bous, an ox and glossa, a tongue,
in reference to the broad, rough leaves (Al-Shehbaz
1991).
Buglossoides arvensis (L.) I.M.Johnst. in Journal
of the Arnold Arboretum 35: 42 ( 1954); Edmondson: 316
(1978); Qaiser: 82 (1979); Meikle: 1148 (1985); Tolken:
1152 (1986); Verde.: 79 (1991); Gibbons & Brough: 204
(1992); Retief & Herman: 350 (1997). B. an’ensis (L.)
I.M.Johnst. subsp. arvensis sensu R.Fern.: 87 (1972).
Type: Europe, Herb. Linn. 181/4 (LINN, syn.-PRE,
microfiche!).
Lithospermum arvense L.: 132 (1753); A. DC: 74 (1846); Boiss.:
216 ( 1879); C.H.Wright: 24(1904); I.M.Johnst.: 7 ( 1927); Levyns: 688
(1950); Levyns: 234 (1966); Jacot Guill.: 235 (1971); J.H.Ross: 298
(1972).
Illustrations: Qaiser: 83 ( 1979); Tolken: 1153 (1986); Verdcourt: 80
(1991); Gibbons & Brough: 205 ( 1992).
Annual herb up to 0.6 m high, greyish green, hispidu-
lous-strigillose. Roots purplish red. Stems erect or
decumbent, densely covered with appressed setae,
0.7-1 .0 mm long. Leaves sessile, narrowly ovate or nar-
rowly obovate, 15^45 x 3-8 mm, somewhat clasping at
base, apex acute or slightly obtuse, margin entire, dense-
ly setulose; setae rigid, with multicellular, 1 -layered
bases. Inflorescences terminal; cymes scorpioid,
bracteate. Calyx divided almost to base into 5 narrow
lobes; lobes with apices acute, strongly strigose, accres-
cent, up to 12 mm long in fruit. Corolla white, infundibu-
liform; tube cylindric, 5-7 mm long, throat with 5 well-
differentiated, longitudinal bands of hairs extending from
bases of corolla lobes downwards to tips of anthers;
lobes 5, rounded or truncate, ±2x1 mm; annulus near
base of corolla tube of scale-like lobes. Stamens 5,
included, arising from corolla below middle of tube; fil-
aments equal, shorter than anthers; anthers oblong, with
short apical appendage. Ovary 4-lobed, 4-locular,
gynobase disc-like; stigmas 2, subterminal. Fruit of 4
nutlets; nutlets erect, ovoid, flattened on dorsal side,
keeled on ventral side, with ± straight beak, 2. 5-3.0 mm
long, rugose, tuberculate, attachment scar basal or nearly
so; fruiting pedicel ± 2.5 mm long. Flowering time :
August to December. Figure 3.
12
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
Distinguishing characters : annual herb, branching
from base, appressed hairy; corolla infundibuliform,
white, hairy inside; stigmas 2, subterminal; nutlets
rugose, tuberculate.
Distribution'. North-West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga,
Free State, Lesotho, Northern Cape, Western Cape,
Eastern Cape (Figure 4); a native of Eurasia, naturalized
as a weed in many parts of the world.
Habitat', weed of waste places; also in disturbed areas
such as in and along edges of cultivated lands.
Common names: sheepweed, white ironweed,
gromwell, corn gromwell, gromwell-corncockle, puc-
coon; naelbossie, naaldjiebossie, nagelbossie (Afrikaans)
(Smith 1966; Wells et al. 1986).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED (southern Africa only)
Acocks 17740 K. PRE; 17805 PRE; 19035 K. PRE; 40897 PRE. Acocks
& Roux 15948 K, PRE.
FIGURE 3. — Buglossoides arvensis.
A, habit, x 0.65; B, stigma, x
13.6; C, tuberculate nutlet, x
12; D, corolla laid open, x
3.3; E, setae on upper leaf
surface, x 34.5. A, C-E, Acocks
19035', B, Acocks 17740. Illu-
strations by Gillian Condy.
Bolus 101 BOL; 122 K; 274 GRA; 9201 BOL. Bradfield 200 PRE.
Burchell 1686 K.
Dieterlen 1290 PRE.
Flanagan 1629 K, PRE. Fourcade 941 BOL. GRA.
Gerrard 230 K.
Holub s.n. K.
Jenkins TRV7232 PRE.
Leendertz TRV9748 PRE. Lovemore GRA-A1642 GRA.
MacOwan 1926 GRA. M a doth 7216. 9670. PRE40898 PRE. Mogg
15292 PRE. Muir 790 PRE.
Schlecliter 3550 GRA. Sharpe 9145 PRE. Silk 52 PRE. Smith 884 PRE.
Tyson 378 GRA. Trollope GRA-A1640 GRA.
Wardle FRE40893 PRE. Wilman 19817. PRE59952 PRE. Wilms 1006
BM. Wolley-Dod 1551 K; 2794 BOL; 3611 BM. BOL, K.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr O.A. Leistner, Miss G. Condy, Mines E. du Plessis
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
13
FIGURE 4. — Known distribution of Buglossoides arvensis in the
Flora of southern Africa region.
and J. Ready are thanked for assistance with the prepara-
tion of the manuscript. The directors, curators and staff
of cited herbaria are thanked for allowing the authors to
study their material and for sending specimens on loan.
REFERENCES
AHN, Y.M. & LEE. S. 1986. A palynotaxonomic study of the Korean
Boraginaceae. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 16: 199-215.
AL-SHEHBAZ. I. A. 1991. The genera of Boraginaceae in the south-
eastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum , sup-
plementary series 1: 1-169.
BOISSIER. E. 1879. Lithospennum (Borragineae). Flora orientalis 4:
216-220. Georg, Geneva.
BOLUS. H. & WOLLEY-DOD. A.H. 1904. A list of the flowering
plants and ferns of the Cape Peninsula with notes on some of
the critical species. Transactions of the South African
Philosophical Society 14: 207-373.
BRUMMITT. R.K. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Royal
Botanic Gardens. Kew.
CLARKE. G.C.S. 1977. The northwest European pollen flora. 10
(Boraginaceae). Review of Pal aeobot am and Palynology 24:
59-101.
DE CANDOLLE. A. 1846. Lithospennum (Borragineae). Prodromus
10: 73-86. Masson. Paris.
DIEZ. M.J.. VALDES. B. & FERNANDEZ. 1. 1986. Pollen morpholo-
gy of Spanish Lithospennum s.l. (Boraginaceae) and its taxo-
nomic significance. Grana 25: 171-176.
EDMONDSON. J.R. 1978. Buglossoides. In PH. Davis. Flora of
Turkey 6: 315-317.
ERDTMAN, G. 1960. The acetolysis method, a revised description.
Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 561-564.
FERNANDES, R. 1971. Boraginaceae. Flora europaea — notulae sys-
tematicae 1 1 . Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 379.
FERNANDES. R. 1972. Buglossoides. Flora europaea 3: 87. 88.
GIBBONS, B. & BROUGH. P. 1992. Photographic guide to the wild
flowers of Britain and northern Europe. Hamlyn. London.
GURKE, M. 1897. Borraginaceae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4,
3a: 71-131. Engelmann. Leipzig.
HERMAN, P.P.J. 1993. Boraginaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet.
Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 595-600.
INGRAM. J. 1958. Studies in the cultivated Boraginaceae 1.
Lithospennum and related genera. Baileya 6: 91-100.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. 1971. Flora of Lesotho. Cramer, Lehre.
JOHNSTON. l.M. 1927. Studies in the Boraginaceae 6. A revision of
the South American Boraginoideae. Contributions from the
Gray Herbarium 78: 1-118.
JOHNSTON. I.M. 1954. Studies in the Boraginaceae 26. Further reval-
uations of the genera of the Lithospermeae. Journal of the
Arnold Arboretum 35: 1—8 1 .
LEBRUN. J. & STORK. A.L. 1997. Enumeration des plantes a fleurs
d’Afrique tropical e 4. Conservatoire et Jardin botanique de la
Ville de Geneve, Geneva.
LEISTNER. O.A. (ed.). 2000. Glossary. Seed plants of southern Africa:
families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 759.
LEVYNS. M.R. 1950. Boraginaceae. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter.
Flora of the Cape Peninsula : 687-691. Juta, Cape Town.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1966. Guide to the flora of the Cape Peninsula, edn 2.
Juta, Cape Town.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum , edn 1. Laurentius Salvius.
Stockholm.
MABBERLEY. D.J. 1997. The plant-book, edn 2. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
MEIKLE. R.D. 1985. Buglossoides. Flora of Cyprus 2: 1147-1149.
MOENCH, C. 1794. Buglossoides. Methodus plantas horti botanici et
agri marburgensis. Nova Libraria Academiae, Marburg.
QAISER. M. 1979. Buglossoides (Boraginaceae). Flora of Libya 68:
81-84.
RETIEF. E. 2000. Boraginaceae. In O.A. Leistner. Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 178-183.
RETIEF. E. & HERMAN. P.P.J. 1997 Boraginaceae. Plants of the
northern provinces of South Africa: keys and diagnostic char-
acters. Strelitzia 6: 350-354.
RETIEF. E. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1999. The taxonomic significance of
pollen morphology in the southern African Boraginaceae. In J.
Timberlake & S. Kativu. African plants: biodiversity , taxonomy
and uses: 319-328. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.
RIEDL. H. 1967. Lithospennum (Boraginaceae). Flora iranica 48:
148-152.
ROSS, J.H. 1972. The Flora of Natal. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa No. 39: 298.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common names of South African plants. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 35.
TOLKEN. H.R. 1986. Buglossoides. In J.P. Jessop & H.R. Tolken,
Flora of South Australia 3: 1152.
VERDCOURT. B. 1991. Buglossoides. In R.M. Polhill. Flora of tropi-
cal East Africa, Boraginaceae: 79-81.
WELLS. M.J.. JOFFE, H„ ENGELBRECHT. V.M., HARDING. G. &
STIRTON, C.H. 1986. A catalogue of problem plants in southern
Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa. No 53.
WRIGHT. C.H. 1904. Lithospennum (Boragineae). Flora capensis 4,2: 20-24.
■
Bothalia 32,1 : 15-19 (2002)
Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from south-
ern Africa. 3. Riccardia compcicta
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aneuraceae, Riccardia Gray, R. compacta (Steph.) S.W.Arnell. southern Africa, Tanzania
ABSTRACT
Riccardia compacta (Steph.) S.W.Arnell is described and illustrated. Its presently known distribution in southern Africa
is indicated on an accompanying map. Some differences between local plants of the species and those from Tanzania are
discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Riccardia compacta (Steph.) S.W.Arnell is the third
species to be treated in the current revision of southern
African taxa of this family. It was originally collected on
Table Mountain by Jelinek, while on a Novara
Expedition, and described as Aneura compacta by
Stephani in 1893. Sim (1926) referred to it briefly, stat-
ing that it frequently occurred in forest districts through-
out South Africa, which is doubtful, however, as it is
apparently rare. Later on. two more specimens were col-
lected on Table Mountain: one by Pillans, and the second
by Arnell, who also collected it at Knysna. Arnell (1952)
then transferred it to the genus Riccardia. During the
1950s Esterhuysen collected more specimens on high
altitude peaks in Western Cape, but, regrettably, there
have been no local collections since then. Arnell (1959)
described an Esterhuysen specimen from Tanganyika
(Tanzania) as R. kilimandjaricci S.W.Arnell, which was
placed in synonymy under R. compacta by Meenks &
Poes (1985). Poes, either alone or with Ochyra, collected
more material on Mt Kilimanjaro and Mt Meru during
the 1980s. It was concluded by Meenks & Poes that there
were a few differences between Tanzanian plants of the
species and the type specimen collected by Jelinek on
Table Mountain. They also state that R. compacta is an
Afro-alpine species which occurs at higher altitudes in
East Africa than in South Africa.
Riccardia compacta (Steph.) S. W.Amell in Botaniska
Notiser 1952: 141 (1952); S.W.Arnell: 88 (1963); Meenks
& Poes: 84 ( 1985). Type: Cap. Tafelberg, Jelinek , Novara
Expedition, ( 19560G . holo.!; EGR).
Aneura compacta Steph.: 19 (1893): Steph.: 755 (1901-1905): Sim:
29 (1926).
Thalli prostrate, in compact cushions or patches, up to
3 or 4 mm thick, in several overlying layers of dense and
intricately intertwined, slightly rounded, narrow bands,
quite fleshy and firm, but rather brittle, bright green, with
an ill-defined, somewhat darker, narrow strip occupying
median V3 or more of branches; when dry, brown to dark
brown. Main axis up to 15 mm long, not markedly dif-
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2002-01-14.
ferentiated, though often retaining its dominance,
branching generally crowded and irregular (Figure 1A),
sometimes bifurcate (Figure IB), branches narrowing
somewhat toward tips or maintaining same width
throughout, rarely slightly dilated distally, apically ±
truncate, shallowly notched, margins obtuse, not winged.
Primary branches/pinnae arising laterally from axis,
very close together or at intervals of 0.30-0.95 mm
between successive ones, opposite or subopposite,
obliquely spreading at angles up to 30° with axis, occa-
sionally suberect, often relatively well developed,
2. 0- 3. 5 mm long, up to 0.5 mm wide, usually linear,
some bifurcate, rarely trifurcate, others poorly devel-
oped, almost rudimentary. Secondary’ branches/pinnules
quite rare, if present, mostly remaining small. Stolons
unbranched, generally arising on basal part of axis, occa-
sionally developing more distally from apices of some
primary branches. Dorsal epidermal cells in median part
of apical segment of main axis (Figure 1C) from above
4-6-sided, thick-walled. 40-50 x 27.5-37.5 pm, subdor-
sal cells larger, 75-130 x 30.0-42.5 pm, subventral cells
50.0- 87.5 x 15-20 pm, ventral epidermal cells 35-60 x
30^)0 pm. Oil bodies not seen in material studied.
Margins of apical segment of main axis (Figure ID)
entire, from above outer cells 25.0-37.5 x 27.5-35.0 pm,
subquadrate to rectangular, intramarginal cells 5- or 6-
sided, 32.5-50.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm, walls somewhat thick-
ened. Cross sections of main axis at ± middle of ultimate
segment (Figure IE) and toward base (Figure IF) bicon-
vex, ± 180 pm, or 6/7 cell layers up to 240 pm, or 8 cell
layers thick medianly, and up to 460 pm wide, margins
tapering to obtuse, dorsal epidermal cells 27.5-30.0 pm
high, medullary cells ovoid to almost spherical, sizes
variable, 25-45 x 22.5-35.0 pm, walls thickened, ventral
epidermal cells 30-35 pm high: cross section of primary
branch at ± its middle (Figure IG) plano-convex, ± 200
pm or 5/6 cell layers thick medianly, up to 475 pm wide,
medullary cell walls slightly thickened; cross section of
stolon (Figure 1H) oval, ± 160 pm or 6 cell layers thick
medianly, ± 210 pm wide, cell walls somewhat thick-
ened. Mucilage papillae ventral, clustered at emarginate
apex of pinnae and then in two, spaced, acropetal rows,
one on either side of midline, reddish brown, club-
shaped, 62.5-75.0 x 20-25 pm above, narrower below,
rarely persistent. Rhizoids in widely scattered, irregular
patches along ventral surface of pinnae, hyaline, up to 15
pm wide. Asexual reproduction by gemmae not seen.
2 mm n 2 mm z mm
16
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 1 . — Riccardia compacta. A, sterile thallus with axis and irregular lateral branches crowded below; B. axis with primary branches; C.
median dorsal epidermal cells (solid lines) of ultimate segment of axis, and large subdorsal cells (stippled lines); D, margin of ultimate seg-
ment of axis; E, c/s axis at ± middle of ultimate segment; F, c/s axis below; G, c/s primary branch; H, c/s stolon; I, male thallus with 3
antheridial branches. J-L, antheridial branch: .1, from above; K, from side; L, c/s. M, female thallus with calyptra, seta and dehisced cap-
sule valves; N, gynoecial branch with very young calyptra and paraphyses. O, calyptra: Oi, corona; CF, capsule; CF, seta; CF. basal portion.
P, c/s calyptra wall; Q. c/s seta: R, c/s part of bistratose wall of capsule valve showing different cell walls: abr, abaxial radial; adr, adaxial
radial; it. inner tangential; mw, median; ot, outer tangential. S, elater; Ti_j, spores. A-F, H-T, Arnell 963; G, Jelinek I9560G , holo.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
17
FIGURE 2. — A, cells of epidermal
layer of wall of valve in
external longitudinal view. B.
cells of inner layer of wall of
valve in internal longitudinal
view. A, B, Arnell 963. A, B,
x 446.
Dioicous. Antheridial branches solitary or occasional-
ly in sympodial pairs, lateral on main axis opposite or
subopposite primary branch, otherwise on primary
branch close to its base (Figure II), stipitate, ± oblong
(Figure 1J), up to 600 pm long, ± 320 pm wide, mostly
bearing 3 or 4, rarely up to 8 pairs of antheridia, cavities
70-100 pm diam., encircled by 2 or 3 rows of cells,
25-30 x 30 pm; in cross section ± 250 pm high (Figure
1L), margins winged (Figure IK), with single, incurved
row of large, obliquely orientated cells, 75.0-112.5 x
40-45 pm, apically rounded and free, otherwise adjoin-
ing; ventral papillae up to 30 pm long, in lateral pairs, but
rare. Gynoecial branches (Figure IN) short and oblique-
ly ventro-lateral on main axis, opposite or at base of pri-
mary branch, ± sessile, not seen with archegonia, only
with very young calyptra, up to 500 pm long, including
corona, the latter with apical row of radiating cells, width
across widest part below 480-525 pm, including sur-
rounding paraphyses, which are scale-like and dentate,
with cells 40.0-52.5 x 27.5-30.0 pm. Calyptra (Figure
1M, O) clavate, up to 2.4 x 0.7 mm, cross section of wall
± 180 pm or 5/6 cell layers thick (Figure IP), some out-
ermost ones with low protrusions, at apex corona
smoothly rounded above, cells thick-walled, dislodged at
maturity by emerging capsule. Seta ± 6.5 mm long, ± 280
pm wide, with 4 central and an outer row of 12 cells, i.e.
4 cells diam. (Figure IQ). Capsule ± ellipsoidal,
790-850 pm long, elaterophore internally attached to
apex; valves 280-350 pm or 21-24 cell rows wide, cells
of epidermal layer in external longitudinal view (Figure
2A), 55-110 x 10.0-12.5 pm, with strong vertical (radi-
al) thickenings, evident as nodular brown bulges; in cross
section (Figure 1R) cells rectangular, ± 7.5 pm thick,
thickenings on adaxial radial and abaxial radial walls
extending slightly onto outer and inner tangential walls,
resulting in a crescentic ring of thickening, bands on one
side of median wall alternating with those on the other
side in a mirror image; inner cells in internal longitudinal
view (Figure 2B) 67.5-85.0 x 12.5-17.5 (-20.0) pm,
with nodular thickenings and with faint semiannular
bands; in cross section (Figure 1R) cells ± 10 pm thick,
thickened on adaxial radial and abaxial radial walls,
extending slightly onto outer tangential walls and further
across inner tangential walls. Spores (Figure 1 T i_3) ±
orbicular, 12.5-15.0 pm diam., translucent, scabrate.
Elaters (Figure IS) 97.5-317.5 x 7.5-10.0 pm, with sin-
gle spiral band, tapering to unspiralled apical portions.
Chromosome no.: n = unknown. [It was suggested by
Hewson ( 1970), that the ‘normal’ number of n = 10 may
be associated with the dioicous state and the monoicous
state with double that number, i.e. 20],
DISCUSSION
The occurrence of Riccardia compacta in southern
Africa appears to be restricted to Western Cape (Figure
3), generally at altitudes between 1 085 and 1 220 m, but
it has also been collected close to sea level. It usually
grows in wet, shady places, with low light intensity, on
rotten wood, soil banks or on Table Mountain Sandstone.
The oil bodies were initially and briefly described by
Arnell (1952) as ‘rare, 3-8 x 8-22 pm, brownish’ and he
also illustrated a cell containing one (Arnell 1952: fig.
2h). In a much more detailed account, Meenks & Poes
(1985) observed that the oil bodies were ‘rare or even
absent in the epidermal cells and never in the cells of the
wing’. They were, however, ‘frequently present in the
inner cells of the thallus’, and were described by the
above authors as ‘light brown, 1 or 2 per cell’, as well as
‘globose to ellipsoid or bean-like, 8 x 8-30 x 12 pm’.
18
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Riccardia compacta in southern Africa.
During a visit to Table Mountain (and other areas in
Western Cape) in October 2000 by Perold & Koekemoer,
we were unable to find fresh material in order to study
the oil bodies. All the collections that I examined, had
long ago lost their oil bodies. The colour of fresh plants
could also not be observed, but Pillans had noted on the
label of his collection from Table Mountain, that they
were bright green and Meenks & Poes (1985) stated that
they were emerald green to dark brown.
In a comparison between plants from Tanzania and
those from South Africa (with information reported by
Arnell 1963), Meenks & Poes (1985) found that the for-
mer specimens were generally longer at 20 mm versus 7
mm; in transverse section 6 or 7 cell layers thick, versus
4 or 5 cell layers; spore diameter 12-22 pm versus 12-14
pm; wing of main axis 1 cell wide, cells elongated, up to
75 x 40 pm, versus wing absent.
In my findings the thalli of our plants are up to 15 mm
long and in cross section the ultimate segment of the
main axis is 6 or 7 cell layers thick, the spore diameter is
1 2.5- 15.0 pm, and the male branches are shorter at ± 600
pm long, with 3 or 4, rarely up to 8 pairs of antheridia;
the wing is formed by a row of elongated, apically round-
ed cells that are laterally adjoined, but apically free. Male
branches in the Tanzanian specimen that I studied are
mostly longer than ours, i.e. up to 1600 pm long, with
4-14 pairs of antheridia, the wing consisting of a row of
quadrate to rectangular cells, 42.5-45.0 pm high,
37.5- 42.5 pm wide, their sides joined together right up to
the edge; ventral ly there are 2 rows of conspicuous red-
brown mucilage papillae, up to 60 pm long, rarely seen
in South African specimens. As Meenks & Poes
observed, there are a few differences between Tanzanian
and South African plants. The general facies of the plants
from the two areas is, however, closely similar and there
is no doubt that they belong to the same species.
Meenks & Poes expressed the opinion that all conti-
nental African records of R. caespitans (Steph.)
E.W.Jones (nom. inval.) probably belong to R. compacta.
Apparently, Jones ( 1 956) had identified Hedberg speci-
mens from Mt Muhawara, Uganda, as ‘possibly Aneura
caespitans ’, but had added that R. caespitans is ‘known
with certainty only from the Mascareignes’ [Stephani
(1892) Bourbon, leg. Rodriguez |. I have examined
Dusen GO 1 0680 from Cameroon, incorrectly labelled as
‘TYPUS' with a red sticker, and also figure no. 236 in
Stephani’s leones hepaticarum (1985), which was prob-
ably drawn from the aforesaid Dusen specimen (accord-
ing to a note with it). This plant is decidedly different
from R. compacta specimens: in cross section the ulti-
mate segments of the main axis are 4 cell layers thick and
winged, with 3 unistratose cell rows at both margins. The
lower axis in cross section is 6 cell layers thick median-
ly and not 9 cells as in Stephani’s leones hepaticarum.
Whether Dusen’s specimen belongs to the same species
as Rodriguez’s type collection from Reunion, is very
doubtful, as the latter species was reported by Stephani to
be 10 cell layers thick medianly.
For several reasons I also hesitate to accept R. kili-
mandjarica as a synonym of R. compacta, as was done
by Meenks & Poes. In R. kilimandjarica the thalli appear
to be lighter-coloured, lacking the central dark line, and
more delicate than in R. compacta. Cross sections of the
ultimate segment of the main axis are ± 500 pm wide and
5 or 6 cell layers rows (or 150-170 pm) thick, with the
medullary cells clearly thin-walled, not thick-walled as
in R. compacta.
Schuster (1963) suggested that a number of species,
among them R. compacta, may be assigned to the sub-
genus Phycaneura, which is, however, characterized by
relatively large, thin-walled dorsal epidermal cells.
Although they had not studied specimens and illustra-
tions of R. compacta , Brown & Braggins (1989) think
that the species that Schuster (1963) grouped together,
appear to be members of section Alcicornia , subgenus
Riccardia, rather than of subgenus Phycaneura. Stephani
(1899) had placed together some of these species, e.g. A.
alcicornis, A. compacta, A. diminuta, A. subsimplex, A.
sumatrana and others, as ‘Plantae filiformes, subteretes’.
R. compacta appears to bear some similarities to R. sub-
alpina Furuki ( 1991) from Japan, as it also grows (most-
ly) at higher altitudes, and has small thalli and thick-
walled cells.
R. compacta specimens are distinguished by the fol-
lowing characters: 1, the plants grow in dense, thick
cushions of several layers of intricately intertwining
branches, mostly at high altitudes; 2, the thalli are narrow
and small, only up to ± 15 mm long, with irregularly
branched, lateral branches, their margins generally paral-
lel and unwinged; 3, from above the dorsal cells of the
ultimate segment of the main axis are thick-walled, and
in cross section, so are the medullary cells; 4, the
antheridia] branches in South African plants are usually
short and have conspicuous marginal cells; and 5, the
corona of the calyptra is smooth and the cells thick-
walled.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
R. compacta
Arnell 96.1, Table Mountain (S): 1623. near Park Station. Knysna (BOL).
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
19
Esterhuysen 24253 A , 24255, N side of Tsitsikama Mts (BOL); 25497.
Apollo Peak. Cederberg (BOL. PRE).
Jelinek 19560G (holotype). Table Mountain (G).
Pillans 4247, Table Mountain (BOL). Poes & Ochyra 88152/R, Mt
Meru. Tanzania (PRE).
Quite a few specimens (held at BOL. PRE & S) have been incorrectly
referred to R. compacta , probably because of the small size of some of
these plants. Arnell 1689, Gouna Forest. Knysna (PRE) is, in fact, R.
multifida (Perold 2001).
R. kilimandjarica
Esterhuysen 27249 (holotype of R. kilimandjarica). Mt Kilimanjaro,
Tanzania (S).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The curators of BOL. G and S are thanked for the loan
of specimens. I also express my most sincere gratitude to
Dr M. Koekemoer. curator of PRE. for all her help with
fieldwork, and to the referees for their helpful sugges-
tions and advice. A special word of thanks to Mr M.
Wigginton (UK) for very kindly procuring and sending a
photocopy of the Renauld & Cardot paper. The artist.
Mrs M. Steyn. the photographer, Mrs A. Romanowski
and the typist, Ms D. Maree are warmly thanked for their
valued contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL. S.W. 1952. South African species of Riccardia. Botaniska
Notiser 1952: 138-156.
ARNELL, S.W. 1959. A new species of Riccardia from Kilimanjaro.
Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 53: 543. 544.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural
Science Council, Stockholm.
BROWN, E.A. & BRAGGINS, J.E. 1989. A revision of the genus
Riccardia S.F.Gray in New Zealand with notes on the genus
Aneura Dum. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 66:
1-132.
FURUKI, T. 1991. A taxonomical revision of the Aneuraceae
(Hepaticae) of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 70: 293-397.
HEWSON, H.J. 1970. The family Aneuraceae in Australia and New
Guinea: II. The genus Riccardia. Proceedings of the Linnean
Society of New South Wales 95: 60-121.
JONES. E.W. 1956. African hepatics XL The genus Riccardia in trop-
ical Africa. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 3:
74-84.
MEENKS. J.L.D. & POCS, T. 1985. East African bryophytes IX
Aneuraceae. Abstracta Botanica 9: 79-98.
PEROLD, S.M. 2001. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Riccardia
and its type species R. multifida, with confirmation of its pres-
ence in the region. Bothalia 31: 183-187.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1963. Studies on antipodal Hepaticae. I. Annotated
keys to the genera of antipodal Hepaticae with special reference
to New Zealand and Tasmania. Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 26: 185-309.
SIM. T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1—475. Cape Town.
STEPHANI, F. 1892. Hepaticae. In F. Renauld & J Cardot. Musci
exotici novi vel minus cogniti. Bulletin de la Societe Royale
Botanique de Belgique 30: 194-207.
STEPHANI. F. 1893. Hepaticae species novae. 1. Hedwigia 32: 17-29.
STEPHANI. F. 1899. Species hepaticarum 1: 97-304.
STEPHANI. F. 1901-1905. Species hepaticarum II: 727-764.
STEPHANI, F. 1985. leones hepaticarum. Microfiche, Inter Documen-
tation Company bv. Leiden.
Bothalia 32.1: 21-28 (2002)
Revision of the Tarchonanthus camphoratus complex (Asteraceae-
Tarchonantheae) in southern Africa
P.P.J. HERMAN*
Keywords: Asteraceae, new species, resurrected names, revision, southern Africa, Tarchonanthus camphoratus L.
ABSTRACT
The Tarchonanthus camphoratus L. complex in southern Africa is revised. Five species are recognized on the grounds
of differences in synflorescences, flowering times, leaf shape and margin, and distribution. Two names, T. minor Less, and
T. obovatus DC., are resurrected and two new species, T. littoralis RRJ. Herman and T. parvicapitulatus P.P.J. Herman, are
described. A key, full descriptions of each taxon and distribution data are presented.
INTRODUCTION
Plants belonging to the Tarchonanthus camphoratus
L. complex are well known in southern Africa and are
commonly known as camphor bush Ikanferbos (Afri-
kaans) (Smith 1966; De Winter et al. 1978) or African
fleabane, camphor wood, sagewood, wild cotton, wild
sage, basterolien, bastervaalbos, bergvaalbos, kanfer-
boom, kanferhout, kapokboom , kleinvaalbos, salie ,
saliehout , vaalbos, veldvaalbos, waaibos, wildesalie and
witbos (Afrikaans) (Wells et al. 1986). or camphor tree,
siriehout (Afrikaans), isiDuli selindle (Xhosa), isiDuli-
sehlathi, iGqebe-elimhlophe (Zulu), mofahlana (South
Sotho), mohatlha (Tswana), sefahla (North Sotho),
moologa (Venda) and omutea (Herero) (Palmer &
Pitman 1972). Various parts of the plants are used medi-
cinally (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962; Smith 1966;
Palmer & Pitman 1972). The wood was used for turnery,
boat-building, musical instruments, cabinet work, fence
posts, shafts of spears and walking sticks (Smith 1966;
Palmer & Pitman 1972; Coates Palgrave 1977).
Tarchonanthus camphoratus is used as a fodder plant in
dry areas (Smith 1966; Palmer & Pitman 1972; Tree
Society of Southern Africa 1974). It is a very common
element in some areas and some veldtypes have been
named after it, e.g. the subdivisions of the Vryburg Shrub
Bushveld by Acocks (1988) into the Tarchonanthus Veld
of the Ghaap Plateau, the Mixed Tarchonanthus Veld of
the Asbestos and Kuruman Hills, the Mixed Tcirchonan-
thus-Rhus-Croton Veld of the Langeberg and the Mixed
Tarchonanthu$-Thomve\d of the Kimberley plains and
koppies. In all these cases, Tarchonanthus camphoratus
L. sens. str. is involved.
A number of different names have been published for
various Tarchonanthus taxa, but they were all put into
synonymy under T. camphoratus by Paiva (1972) and
subsequently by Hilliard (1977), Pope (1992) and
Beentje (1999). Several workers maintained that there
were different taxa under T. camphoratus (Acocks 1988;
A. Gubb pers. comm.), with differences in palatability
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-03-19.
(Burchell 1824; A. Gubb pers. comm.). While I was
preparing a manuscript for Flowering Plants of Africa
(Herman & Condy 2001 ), it became clear that there were
in fact a number of different taxa grouped under T. cam-
phoratus. Differences in synflorescences, flowering
times, leaf shape and margin and distribution, led to the
recognition of five species. Two names are herewith res-
urrected and two new species described.
The septate hairs present in the capitula, which can be
considered a generic characteristic for the genus, are
described by Herman (2001 ). The descriptions of the leaf
shapes are based on that proposed by Radford et al.
(1974) and Radford (1986).
Key to species of Tarchonanthus
For the sake of completeness, Tarchonanthus trilobus
(also occurring in southern Africa) is included in the key.
la Involucral bracts of male and female capitula linear, free;
adaxial leaf surfaces bullate (Figure 1A) . . . T. trilobus
lb Involucral bracts of male and female capitula lanceolate,
elliptic, ovate or obovate, free, or of male capitula fused
to ± halfway: adaxial leaf surfaces reticulate (Figure
IB):
2a Capitula in dense, spicate, axillary or terminal clusters
(Figure 2A. C); involucral bracts of male and female
capitula free; peak flowering time September to
December (spring to early summer) 1. T. minor
2b Capitula in lax, open panicles (Figure 2B. D); involucral
bracts of male capitula fused to halfway, of female
capitula free; peak flowering time February to August
(late summer, autumn and winter):
3a Leaf margins always entire:
4a Leaves narrowly elliptic to slightly oblanceolate. acute
or obtuse; cottony hairs enveloping cypselas
creamy or yellowish; widespread . 3. T. camphoratus
4b Leaves obovate or elliptic, obtuse or acute; cottony
hairs enveloping cypselas pure white; restricted to
Gordonia area (Northern Cape) mostly on iron
stone or limestone base in sandy soils . . . 4.T. obovatus
3b Leaf margins often faintly denticulate in upper part or entire:
5a Leaves large, up to 140 x 45 mm; petioles up to 12 mm
long; fruiting capitula large, up to 15 mm diam.;
growing along coast from southern KwaZulu-
Natal to Western Cape 2. T. littoralis
5b Leaves smaller, up to 60 x 16 mm; petioles up to 5 mm
long; fruiting capitula small, up to 10 mm diam.;
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
22
FIGURE 1. — Scanning electron micrographs of adaxial leaf surfaces of Tarchonanthus species. A, bullate surface of T. trilobus var. trilobus,
Strey 9016 (PRE); B, reticulate surface of T. minor, Leistner 495 (PRE). Scale bars: 100 pm.
growing inland, occurring in forests, valleys or
bushveld on mountain slopes, hills and river
banks; Northern Province, North-West, Gauteng,
Mpumalanga, Swaziland and KwaZulu-Natal . . .
5. T. pan’icapitulatus
1. Tarchonanthus minor Less., Synopsis generum
Compositarum: 208 (1832); DC.: 431 (1836); Harv.: 118
(1865). Type: South Africa, [Orange] Free State, 2925
Jagersfontein, Fauresmith, under edge of plateau of
Langeberg, (-CB), NW slope, 21 October 1925, Smith
942 (PRE!, neotype, here designated).
T. angustissimus DC.: 431 (1836). Syntype: South Africa,
[Northern] Cape, Philipstown, on the Table Mountain, near Horse’s
Grave (= Paardeberg), ??Karrapoort, Burchell 2691 [G-DC; K!, lecto.
chosen by Beentje: Kew Bulletin 54,1: 83 (1999)-PRE photo.!].
Dioecious shrub or small tree up to 5 m high. Leaves
aromatic, alternate, small, narrowly elliptic (Figure 3A),
1 0 — 40(— 52) x 2.5-15.0 mm, discolorous, upper surface
bright to dark green, pubescent when young, becoming
glabrous except for hairs in lower half of furrow caused
by sunken main vein, reticulate, with golden glands on
margins of reticulations (Figure IB), lower surface
densely whitish tomentose; apex acute, often mucronate
subapically; base cuneate; margin entire, rarely denticu-
late. Petiole l-3(rarely up to 5) mm long. Synflorescences
dense, spicate, axillary and terminal clusters (Figure 2A,
C). Male plants : capitula homogamous discoid, 7-12
mm diam., 15-80-flowered, sessile. Involucral bracts
densely hairy, free, in ± 3 rows, imbricate; outer ovate,
acute to acuminate, up to 7 x 5 mm; middle row ovate,
acute or obovate, 4x3 mm; inner row linear, 5 x 0.5
mm. Corolla infundibuliform, hairy and glandular; tube
5-6 mm long; lobes 5, 1. 5-2.0 mm long, recurved, papil-
late. Anthers exserted, with ovate apical appendage, cal-
carate, caudate, tails ± I mm long, branched; filaments
1 .5 mm long. Style up to 6 mm long, well exserted, undi-
vided or with 2 very small lobes, papillate. Ovary nar-
rowly oblong, sterile, with long, septate hairs. Female
plants : capitula homogamous discoid, 6-10 mm diam.,
1-1 1-flowered, sessile or peduncle up to 3 mm long.
Involucral bracts densely hairy, free, in 2 or 3 rows;
outer ovate, acute or obovate, obtuse, 4-7 mm long; mid-
dle row obovate, obtuse or acute, 5-7 mm long; inner
row oblanceolate, 4-7 mm long. Corolla infundibuli-
form, hairy and glandular; tube 1 .5-2.0 mm long; lobes
5, 1.0-1. 5 mm long, papillate, recurved. Style well
exserted, 4 mm long, with 2 broad, 0.5- 1.0 mm long
lobes. Ovary elliptic, 3^4 mm long, glandular and sep-
tate-hairy. Cypsela enveloped by long, white, silky, sep-
tate hairs. Pappus absent. Flowering time: August to
December with a peak from September to December
(spring to early summer).
Distribution and habitat: Tarchonanthus minor
occurs in the Free State, Lesotho, Northern, Western and
Eastern Cape on hillslopes, mountainsides, rocky ridges
and hills (Figure 4).
Vernacular names: small-leaf camphor bush, klein-
blaarkanferbos (Afrikaans) are here proposed.
Notes : 1 ) Lessing described T. minor in 1832 but cited
no specimen (see also Pope 1992); neither did De
Candolle ( 1836), but only referred to Lessing’s descrip-
tion. Beentje (1999) stated that the plants Lessing saw,
were destroyed at B. Harvey (1865) cited a few speci-
mens. I chose Smith 942 as neotype as Smith made a note
on his specimen: ‘Agrees in shape and size of leaves with
Cooper 708 cited by Harvey in Flora capensis 3: 118
under T. minor Less., but Cooper specimen is barren'.
2) The name ‘minor’ has been misapplied to almost
all species of Tarchonanthus recognized here. Tarcho-
nanthus minor is distinguished from the other species by
the small, narrowly elliptic, entire leaves, dense, spicate
synflorescences and flowering time in spring and sum-
mer. The leaves in some of the Lesotho specimens reach
the upper limit of the range in leaf size.
2. Tarchonanthus littoralis P.PJ. Herman, sp.
nov., T. camphoratus L. affinis sed folia magna, oblan-
ceolata, elliptica ad anguste elliptica, raro obovata,
( 3 2— )40— 1 40 x 10-45 mm, bicoloria, supra atrovirentia.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
23
FIGURE 2. — Synflorescences of Tarchonanthus species. A, dense, spicate male synflorescences of T. minor, Galpin 13954 (PRE); B, paniculate
male synflorescences of T. camphoratus, Story 1057 (PRE); C, dense, spicate female synflorescences of T. minor Liebenberg 7317 (PRE);
D. paniculate female synflorescences of T. parvicapitulatus, Botha 2660 (PRE). Scale bars; 10 mm.
infra albida; margine integra vel plerumque apicem ver-
sus leviter denticulato; petiolus 5— 8(— 1 2) mm longus;
cypsela pilis involvens albidis; plerumque littora
incolens.
TYPE. — South Africa, [KwaZulu-]Natal, 3030 Port
Shepstone, Uvongo, Deppe’s road, (-CB), 10 March
1970, Strey 9713 (PRE, holo.!).
Dioecious shrubs or trees, 1-8 m high. Leaves aro-
matic, alternate, large, oblanceolate, elliptic to narrowly
elliptic, rarely obovate (Figure 3B, C), (32-)40-140 x
24
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 3. — Leaf shapes of Tarclionanthus species. A, small, narrow-
ly elliptic, entire leaf of T. minor. Braack 22 (PRE). B, C,
Tarchonanthus littoralis : B, large, narrowly elliptic leaf,
O’Callaghan, Fellingham & Van Wyk 186 (PRE); C, oblanceo-
late leaf with denticulate margins, Osborne 18 (PRE). D. nar-
rowly elliptic, entire leaf of T. camplioratus, Germishuizen 369
(PRE). E, F, Tarchonanthus obovatus: E, obovate, entire leaf,
Gubb 1562 (KMG); F, elliptic, entire leaf, Gubb 1519 (KMG).
G, H, Tarchonanthus parvicapitulatus: G, oblanceolate, obtuse
leaf with entire margins, Mogg PRE43479 (PRE); H. oblanceo-
late, obtuse-mucronate leaf with denticulate margins, Compton
27888 (PRE). Scale bar: 10 mm. Drawn by G. Condy.
10-45 mm, discolorous, upper surface bright or dark
green, hairy when young, becoming glabrous, reticulate,
with glands on margins of reticulations, main vein
sunken and hairy, especially in lower half, lower surface
densely while-hairy, main and secondary veins conspic-
uous; apex obtuse to acute, sometimes with curved
mucro subapically; base cuneate; margin very often
faintly denticulate in upper part, rarely entire. Petiole
5— 8(— 12) mm long. Synflorescences terminal, paniculate.
Male plants’, capitula homogamous discoid, 5-10 mm
diam., 1 3-47-flowered; peduncle 2-12 mm long.
Involucral bracts densely hairy, fused halfway, 5-lobed;
tube 1. 5-3.0 mm long; lobes 1 .5-2.0 mm long; some-
times with few free, inner bracts. Corolla infundibuli-
form, glandular and hairy; tube 2. 0-3. 5 mm long; lobes
5, 1 .0-1.5 mm long, papillate, recurved. Anthers 1 .0-1 .5
mm, exserted, with ovate-triangular, apical appendage,
calcarate, caudate, tails ± 0.5 mm long, branched; fila-
ments 1. 5-3.0 mm long. Style well exserted, 5-8 mm
long, undivided or with 2 small lobes, papillate. Ovary
rod-like, 0. 5-1.0 mm long, glandular, sterile, septate-
hairy. Female plants’, capitula homogamous discoid, ± 5
mm diam., mostly 3(-6)-flowered; peduncle 0-4 mm
long. Involucral bracts free, 3-6 mm long, in 2 or 3
rows; outer bracts ovate or narrowly lanceolate-ovate,
acute; inner elliptic. Corolla infundibuliform, glandular
and hairy; tube 1 .5-2.0 mm long; lobes 5(6), 0. 5-1.0 mm
long, papillate, recurved. Style exserted, 2. 5-3. 5 mm
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of T. minor in southern Africa based on
material at PRE.
long, with 2 short branches, ± 1 mm long. Ovary elliptic
to obovate, 2. 5-4.0 mm long, densely septate-hairy and
glandular. Cypsela obovate to elliptic, ribbed, 3-5 mm
long, densely, white, septate-hairy and glandular. Pappus
absent. Flowering time : December to July with a peak
from February to March (July) (late summer).
Distribution and habitat: Tarchonanthus littoralis
occurs from southern KwaZulu-Natal to Eastern and
Western Cape along the coast, on hillsides, littoral dunes
and river banks (Figure 5).
Vernacular names: coastal camphor bush, kuskanfer-
bos (Afrikaans), are here proposed.
Tarchonanthus littoralis is distinguished by the usual-
ly large, oblanceolate to elliptic or narrowly elliptic, dark
green leaves with mostly denticulate upper margins and
long petiole. The cypsela-containing capitula are rather
FIGURE 5. — Distribution in southern Africa of T. littoralis. •. based
on material at PRE; and T. camplioratus. ■, based on material
at KMG and PRE.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
25
large. This is probably the species described and illus-
trated by Von Breitenbach (1974) under T. camphoratus.
It has often been confused with Brachylaena species.
3. Tarehonanthus camphoratus L., sens, str..
Species plantarum: 842 (1753); Less.: 208 (1832); DC.:
431 (1836); Harv.: 118 (1865); Merxm.: 176 (1967);
Paiva: 360 (1972); Compton: 622 (1976); Hilliard: 111
(1977); Pope: 9 (1992); Beentje: 82 (1999). Type:
'Aethiopia’, in this case South Africa; Hort. Cliff, has
'Cap. Bon. Sp.' (Herb. Cliff. 398 , Tarehonanthus no. I ,
BM, lectotype chosen by Anderberg in Jarvis et al. 1993:
92, see Beentje 1999-PRE, photo.!).
T. litakunensis DC.: 431 (1836); excluding lectotype chosen by
Beentje (1999), here placed under T. littoralis. Lectotype: Burchell
2202 (G-DC, here designated-PRE. photo.!).
T. camphoratus L. var. litakunensis (DC.) Harv.: 118 (1865).
Mostly a multi-stemmed, rounded dioecious shrub,
rarely a tree, 1-8 m high. Leaves aromatic, alternate, nar-
rowly elliptic to slightly oblanceolate (Figure 3D),
(20— )26— 80 x 7-20 mm, discolorous, upper surface grey-
green or khaki-green, hairy when young, becoming
glabrous, reticulate, with glands on margins of reticula-
tions, main vein sunken, hairy in lower part, lower sur-
face densely grey- or greenish hairy, main and secondary
veins prominent, tertiary veins reticulate; apex acute,
often mucronate, sometimes obtuse; base cuneate; mar-
gin entire. Petiole up to 5 mm long. Synflorescences ter-
minal. paniculate (Figure 2B). Male plants : capitula
homogamous discoid. 3.0-11.5 mm diam., 10-60-flow-
ered; peduncle 0-10 mm long. Involucral bracts fused
halfway, 5(-7)-lobed; tube 1. 5-5.0 mm long; lobes
1.0-2. 5 mm long, sometimes with a few free bracts on
inside. Corolla infundibuliform. glandular and hairy;
tube 1.5-3. 5 mm long; lobes 5, 0. 5-1.0 mm long, papil-
late, recurved. Anthers well exserted, 1.0-1. 5 mm long,
with small, ovate, apical appendage, calcarate, caudate,
tails up to 0.5 mm long, branched; filaments 2-3 mm
long. Style well exserted, 4-8 mm long, undivided or
rarely with 2 small lobes, papillate. Ovary rod-like,
0. 5-1.0 mm. sterile, septate-hairy. Female plants: capitu-
la homogamous discoid, 3. 5-7.0 mm diam., ( 1— )3(— 5 )-
flowered; peduncle 0-6 mm long. Involucral bracts
densely hairy, in 2 or 3 rows, free, imbricate, 3-6 mm
long; outer bracts linear-lanceolate to linear-obovate:
middle and inner row ovate. Corolla infundibuliform,
hairy and glandular; tube 1.0-1. 5 mm long; lobes 5, 0.5
mm long, papillate. Staminocles sometimes present. Sf’le
exserted. 1. 5-3.0 mm long, with 2 broad, 0.5 mm long
lobes. Ovary elliptic to obovate, 1^1 mm long, densely
septate-hairy and glandular. Cypsela elliptic, ribbed. 3^f
mm long, creamy or yellowish, densely septate-hairy and
glandular. Pappus absent. Flowering time : March to
August with a peak from March to July (autumn to win-
ter).
Distribution and habitat: Tarehonanthus camphoratus
is widely distributed in the northern part of southern
Africa from Namibia, Botswana, the Northern Province,
North-West, Gauteng, Free State and Northern Cape
(Figure 5). It also occurs in tropical and North Africa and
the Arabian Peninsula. It occurs in a variety of habitats
and soil types, e.g. savanna, bushveld. woodland, grass-
FIGURE 6. — Distribution in southern Africa of T. obovatus. ■.based
on material at KMG and PRE; and T. parvicapitulatus. •. based
on material at PRE.
land, on flats, rocky hills, mountain slopes and hillsides,
riverbanks on sandy, loamy, gravelly, calcrete, quartzite
and dolomitic soils.
Vernacular names: camphor bush, kanferbos
(Afrikaans) as listed by De Winter et al. (1978) is pro-
posed for T. camphoratus sens. str.
Notes: 1) It is very unfortunate that Beentje (1999)
chose Drege 5041 as lectotype for T. litakunensis.
'Fitakun' (Takoon 2723BB) is a small settlement near
Kuruman (Burchell 1824; Leistner & Morris 1976) in the
North-West. However. T. littoralis always grows near the
sea and the specimen chosen by Beentje (Drege 5041)
was collected near the sea. This specimen (Drege 5041)
also conforms to the description of T. littoralis presented
here. It is therefore proposed that Drege 5041 be reject-
ed as lectotype of T. litakunensis.
2) This is the most common taxon of the genus in the
northen parts of southern Africa. It can be distinguished
by the narrowly elliptic to slightly oblanceolate, entire
leaves with a grey-green or khaki-green colour and the
cypselas enveloped by yellowish cottony hairs. Not
browsed by stock (Burchell 1824) except as a last resort
in times of drought [A. Gubb pers. comm.. Speedy 11/22
(PRE)].
4. Tarehonanthus obovatus DC., Prodromus 5:
431 (1836), Herman & Condy: 108, t. 2180 (2001 ). Type:
South Africa, Bechuanaland Division (?Northern Cape),
Klipfontein, Burchell 2155 (G-DC. holo.; K!-PRE, photo.!).
Mostly a single-stemmed dioecious tree or rarely a
shrub, up to 2 m high. Leaves aromatic, alternate, obo-
vate or elliptic (Figure 3E, F), 1 2— 32(— 37 ) x 7-17 mm,
discolorous, upper surface bright green, hairy when
young, becoming glabrous, reticulate, glandular in reticu-
lations, main vein sunken and hairy in lower part, lower
surface densely whitish pubescent, main and secondary
veins prominent, minor veins forming a reticulation;
apex obtuse or acute; base cuneate; margin entire. Petiole
26
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
1. 0- 4.0 mm long. Synflorescences terminal, paniculate.
Male plants: capitula homogamous discoid, 8-1 1 mm
diam., 20-40-flowered; peduncle 0-7 mm long.
Involucral bracts fused halfway. 5-lobed; tube 2.0-2. 5
mm long; lobes 2. 0-2. 5 mm long. Corolla infundibuli-
form, hairy and glandular; tube 1.5-2. 5 mm long; lobes
5(6), 1.0-1. 5 mm long, papillate. Anthers 5(6), exserted,
1.0- 1. 5 mm long, calcarate, caudate, tails ± 0.5 mm long,
branched; filaments 2-3 mm long. Style well exserted,
6-7 mm long, undivided or with 2 small lobes, ± 0.5 mm
long, papillate. Ovary rod-shaped, 0.5-1. 0 mm long,
densely septate-hairy and glandular, sterile. Female
plants: capitula homogamous discoid, 3.5— 4.5 mm diam.,
2-5-flowered; peduncle 0-7 mm long. Involucral bracts
free, in 2 or 3 rows, 3-6 mm long; outer bracts obovate,
acute; inner spathulate or narrowly obovate, acute.
Corolla infundibuliform, glandular and hairy; tube
0.5- 1.0 mm long; lobes 5(6), ± 0.5 mm long, apex papil-
late. Style exserted, 1. 0-2.0 mm long; style branches 0.5
mm long. Ovary obovate, 2-3 mm long, glandular and
septate-hairy. Cypsela brown, obovate, ribbed, 2. 5-5.0
mm long, glandular and pure white, septate-hairy.
Pappus absent. Flowering time: March to May (autumn
to early winter).
Distribution and habitat: Tarchonanthus obovatus is
restricted to Northern Cape where it occurs on hillsides,
rocky outcrops or flats often on an ironstone or limestone
base in sandy soils (Figure 6).
Vernacular names: Gordonia camphor tree, Gordonia-
kanferboom (Afrikaans), was proposed for this taxon (Herman
& Condy 2001). It is known by fanners in that region as
olienvaalbos (Afrikaans) (A. Gubb pers. comm.), but vaal-
bos refers to Brachylaena species (De Winter et al. 1978).
Note: it is interesting that, since the description, the
name T. obovatus has never been used. This species is
recognized by the obovate or elliptic, entire leaves and
the cypselas that are enveloped by pure white, cottony
hairs in contrast to T. camphoratus, occurring in the same
area, which have yellowish hairs enveloping the cypse-
las. Readily browsed by both game and domestic stock
all year round (A. Gubb pers. comm.).
5. Tarchonanthus parvicapitulatus P.P.J. Herman,
sp. nov., T. camphoratus L. affinis sed folia oblanceola-
ta, raro obovata, (22— )25— 60(— 70) mm, margine integra
vel plerumque apicem versus leviter denticulato; capitu-
la parva; synflorescentia laxa.
TYPE. — South Africa, Transvaal [Mpumalanga],
2531 Komatipoort, Barberton, (-CC), lower hill slopes,
April 1890, Galpin 952 (female plant) (PRE, holo.!).
Dioecious shrub or small, multi-stemmed tree, up to 8
m high. Leaves aromatic, alternate, oblanceolate or rarely
obovate (Figure 3G, H), (22-)25-60(-70) x 7-16 mm,
discolorous, upper surface pale, dark green, hairy when
young, becoming glabrous, glandular in reticulations,
midrib sunken and hairy in lower part, lower surface
densely whitish hairy, main and secondary veins promi-
nent; apex obtuse to obtuse-mucronate, sometimes acute;
base cuneate; margin often faintly denticulate in upper
part, rarely entire. Petiole 1. 5-5.0 mm long. Synflores-
cences terminal, paniculate (Figure 2D). Male plants:
capitula homogamous discoid, 5-9 mm diam., 10-30-
flowered; peduncle 0-7 mm long. Involucral bracts
fused halfway, 5-lobed; tube 1-2 mm long; lobes 1.0-1. 5
mm long. Corolla infundibuliform, glandular and hairy;
tube 1. 5-2.0 mm long; lobes 5, 1.0-1. 5 mm long, apex
papillate. Anthers 5, exserted, 1.0-1. 5 mm long, cal-
carate, caudate, tails 0.5 mm long, branched; filaments
2-3 mm long. Style well exserted, 4.0-5. 5 mm long,
entire or with 2 small lobes. Ovary rod-shaped, 0.5 mm
long, sterile, septate-hairy. Female plants: capitula
homogamous discoid, 3-4 mm diam., 1-3-flowered;
peduncle mostly absent or up to 5 mm long. Involucral
bracts free, 2-5 mm long, in 2 or 3 rows, narrowly lanc-
eolate, narrowly ovate or elliptic, acute. Corolla
infundibuliform, glandular and hairy; tube 0. 5-1.0 mm
long; lobes (4)5, 0. 5-1.0 mm long, papillate. Style exsert-
ed, 1-2 mm long, lobes 2, 0.5 mm long. Ovary obovate
to elliptic, 1.5-3. 5 mm long, glandular and septate-hairy.
Cypsela pale or dark brown, obovate, ribbed, 1. 5-3.0
mm long, glandular and pure white, septate-hairy.
Pappus absent. Flowering time: March to October with a
peak from April to June (autumn to winter).
Distribution and habitat: Tarchonanthus parvicapitu-
latus occurs in Namibia(?), Northern Province, the North-
West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Swaziland, KwaZulu-
Natal and Eastern Cape (only 2 records) (Figure 6). It is
also found in Zimbabwe (cf. Borle 157, Sim 19129,
Miller 1776, Ngoni 370 , Wild 1048). It grows in forest,
valleys and bushveld on mountain slopes, hills and river
banks.
Vernacular names: small-head camphor bush, klein-
hofiekanferbos (Afrikaans) are here proposed.
Note: this species is recognized by the oblanceolate,
obtuse-mucronate leaves mostly with denticulate mar-
gins towards the apex. The synflorescences tend to be
more open and the capitula are smaller than in the other
species. This is probably the species referred to by Moll
(1992) under T. camphoratus.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
f, female; m, male.
Acocks 535 (3) (f & m), 543 (3) (f) PRE; 2109 (4) (f), 2117 (3) (m),
2344, 2351, 2352 (3) (f) KMG, PRE; 8617, 8627 (2) (f), 13010 (5) (m)
PRE; KMG 11730 (2) (f) KMG. Alexander PRE43490 (2) (f & m) PRE.
Allen 131 (3) (m) PRE. E.R. Anderson J.I4 (3) (m) PRE. J. Anderson
58 (1) (f & m) PRE. J.R. Anderson ORFS233 ( I ) (in) PRE. Archibald
3595 (2) (f) PRE.
M. Badenhorst 509 (3) (m) KMG. />./. Badenhorst 40, 104 (3) (f)
KMG, PRE. Balsinhas & Kersberg 1948 (3) (f) PRE. N. Barker 886 (5)
(m) PRE. N.P. Barker 621 (3) (m) PRE. Capt. Barrett- Hamilton
TRV6408 (3) (f) PRE. Basson 14 (3) (f) PRE. Bayliss BR1.B.351 (3),
BRI.B.6249 (2). BS8416 (2) (m) PRE. Bengis 447 (1) (f) PRE. Biggs
222 (5) (m) PRE. Boddam-Whethain 60 (1) (f) PRE. Bosch 154 (4) (f)
KMG. Botha 2559 (3) (f), 2660 (5) (f), 3067 (2) (m) PRE. Braack 22
(1) (m) PRE. Bradfield 250 (3) (m) PRE. Britten 33, 736 (2) (f) PRE.
4. Brueckner 845 (3) (m) KMG, PRE. Burchell 2155 (4) (f & m) K,
2691 (I) (sterile) K. Burrows 2102 (I) (m), 2286 (1) (f) PRE. Burn
Davy 148, 10741, 13933 (3) (f), 317(5) (m), 7865 (2) (f), 9537, 10375,
13820 (3) (m) PRE.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
27
Codd 1166 (5) (f), 1169 , 1935 (5) (m), 1283 (4) (f), 1283 (3) (m) PRE.
Collett 510 (3) (m) PRE. E. Collins PRE43484 (5) (m) PRE. .S’. Collins
12 (3) (m) PRE. Comins 1053 (2) (f) PRE. Compton 26015 , 27888,
28810, 32132 (5) (f). 28947 (5) (m) PRE. E.O. Cooke 6271 (3) (m)
KMG. O.L. Cooke 4265 (4) (m) KMG, 6266 collected 4/1940 (4) (m)
PRE. 6266 collected 4/1942 (4) (m). 6267 collected 4/1942 (4) (f)
KMG. Culverwell 23 (5) (m) PRE.
Dahlstrand 420 (2) (f) PRE. Davies, Thompson & Miller 8, 89 (3) (f)
PRE. De Souza 441 (5) (m) PRE. De Villiers PRE43498 (3) (f & m)
PRE. De Winter 2834, 3520 (5) (m), 9256 (2) (f) PRE. De Winter &
Leistner 5636 (3) ( f) PRE. Dieterlen 565 (1) (m) PRE. Dinter 4723 ( 3)
(m) PRE. Dix 211 (2) (m) PRE. Downing 560 (5) (m) PRE. Drege s.n.
(5041) (2) (f) K; PRE9727 (2) (f) PRE. Du Preez & Steenkamp 114 (3)
(f) PRE.
Ecklon & Zeyher 112.11 (1) (m) PRE. D. Edwards 2062 (5) (f), 2505
(5) (m), 4413 (3) (f) PRE. H.W.G. Edwards 52 (5) (f) PRE. C. Evrard
9276 (3) (f) PRE.
Farquharson A1483 (2) (f) PRE. Feely 32 (5) (m) PRE. Fellingham 963
(2) (f) PRE. Flanagan 192 (2) (f & m), 350 (2) (f). 1551 (1) (f), 2330
(5) (m) PRE. Fourie ORFS174 (1) (m) PRE.
Galpin 952 (5) (f & m), 7008 (3) (f). 13954 (1) (m), 133127 (5) (f),
M184 (3) (m) PRE. Gone 268 (2) (f) PRE. Germishuizen 369 (3) (f &
m), 387 (5) (f) PRE. Gerrard 1022 (2) (m) K (mounted with type).
Gerstner 593 (5) (m), 659 (5) (f) PRE. Giess 11693 (3) ( f) PRE.
Gilfillan Herb. Galpin 5533 (1) (m) PRE. Gillett 3434 (2) (m) PRE.
Glen 2761 (5) (f) PRE. Goldblatt 1424 (2) (f & m), 8013 (2) (f) PRE.
Goossens 710 (1) (f). 1673 (3) (f) PRE. Gubb 16 (4) (f), 18 (3) (m)
KMG; 168-1, 219/1, 260-84, 272-2 (4) (f) PRE; 341 (3) (m & f), 342,
343 (3) (f), 344 (4) (f), 345, 346 (3) (f). 347 (3) (m), 349 (3) (m & f).
350 (3) (0, 351 (4) (m), 352, 353, 355 (4) (f), 1088 (3) (m). 1097 (4)
(f), 1328, 1439 (4) (m), 1507 (4) (f), 1513 (4) (m), 1519, 1530 (4) (f),
1562, 1703 (4) (m), 7727(3) (m), 2105 (4) (m), 2221, 2222 (3) (f), 2243
(4) (f), 3603 (3) (m), 4361, 6002, 6516 (4) (f), 7442 (3) (m). 8118,
13680, 14303, 16125, 16127 (4) (f). 16128 (4) (m), 16130 (3) (m),
16131 (3) (f) KMG.
Hansen 3141 (3) (f) PRE. Henrici 4708 (1) (m) PRE. Herbert 29 (4)
(m) KMG. Herman 654 (3) (m). 1523 (4) (m). 1524 (4) (f) PRE.
Humbert 9537 (2) (f) PRE.
Jacobsen 2929 (3) (m) PRE. Jacot-Guillarmod 592 (1) (f), 9920 (2) (m)
PRE. Jarman 82 (1) (m) PRE. Joffe 831, 942 (2) (f), J1 (3) (f) PRE.
Jooste 104 (3) (m), 123 (3) (f), 216 (1) (f) PRE. M. Jordaan 1135 (5)
(f) PRE. P. Jordaan CBK9 (3) (f) PRE
Killick4304 (1) (f) PRE. King 69 (5) (f) PRE. Kotze43 (5) (m). 44 (5) (f) PRE.
Lang TRV31709 (3) (f) PRE. Leach & Bayliss 12920, 12962 (3) (f)
PRE. Leendertz 1136, 2142, TRV11245 (3) (f) PRE. Leighton 3112 (2)
(m) PRE. Leistner 495 (1) (m) PRE. Le Roux 366 (3) (f) PRE. Letty 223
(2) (f) PRE. L.C.C. Liebenberg 4480 (3) (f), 7377 ( 1) (f), 8078 (2) (m)
PRE. Liebenberg S.78, S.84 (3) (m) PRE. Louw 234 (3) (m) PRE.
MacDevette 252 (2) (f) PRE. Macdonald 76/24, 77/148 ( 3) (f) KMG,
PRE. MacMurray 5942 (3) (m), 5943 (3) (f) KMG; 5980 (4) (f) KMG,
PRE. Marais 1137 (2) (f) PRE. Marloth 557 (2) (f & m), 1009, 1329 (3)
(m), 5056, 12750 (3) (f) PRE. Mbedzi 1561 (5) (f) PRE. McClean 265
(2) (f) PRE. McDonald 77/121 (4) (f), 77/122 (4) (m) KMG. PRE.
McGregor Museum 5980 (4) (f) PRE. McMurtry 2432 (5) (m) PRE.
Miller B/202 (3) (f) PRE. Moffett 605 ( 1) (f) PRE. Mogg 4788, 13209
(2) (f), 7925 (3) (f & m), 8517 (3) (m), 16922 (3) (f). PRE43479 (5) (f)
PRE. Moore 11 (3) (f) PRE. Morze 2005 (2) (f) PRE. Mott 985 (3) (f)
PRE. Muir 132 (2) (f) PRE. Muller 1206, 1505 (3) (f) PRE. Munro
PS. 11 (2) (f), PRE2909 (5) (m) PRE. Murray 634 (3) (f) PRE.
Nelson 29 TRV11384 (3) (f) PRE.
Oates 312 (3) (m) PRE. O'Callaghan, Fellingham & Van Wyk 31 , 186
(2) (f) PRE. Osborne 18 (2) (m) PRE. Owens 99, 104 (3) (f) PRE.
Pagan 1729a (3) (f) KMG. Paterson 1001. TRV12337 (2) (f) PRE.
Pearson 1610 (3) (m) PRE. Peeters, Gericke & Burelli 4 (3) (f) PRE.
Phalatse 17 (3) (m) PRE. Phelan 1048 (3) (f) PRE. J. Phillips 1175,
1370 (3) (m) PRE. J.F.V. Phillips For.Herb.350 (2) (f) PRE. Pillans
3492 (2) (m) PRE. Pole Evans 1260. 2226 (3) (m), 2495, 2495(42) (4)
(f). 2496, 2496(43) (4) (m), 3594 (5) (f), H. 15695 ( 3) (f), H. 18041 (2)
(m) PRE. Pole Evans & Smith 1859 ( 1 ) (f) PRE. Potter ex Henrici 2030
(1) (m), 2031 (1) (f) PRE. Poynton For.Herb. 11990 (2) (f) PRE. Prior
PRE43495 (2) (f & m) PRE. Prosser 1844 (3) (f) PRE.
Rauh & Schlieben 9644 (3) (f) PRE. Rehm PRE43513 (1) (f) PRE.
Repton 616 (3) (f & m), 4525, 4562 (5) (f) PRE. Roberts 5379 (1) (m)
PRE. Rodin 2122 (3) (f), 3062 (2) (m) PRE. Rogers 24097 (5) (f), 26851
(2) (f), TRV22185 (5) (f) PRE. Romanowski 6 (2) (f) PRE. Rose-Innes 86
(5) (f) PRE. Ross 2117 (5) (f) PRE. Rossouw TRV26142 (3) (f) PRE.
Rowland, Sealt, Steyn PRE26464 (4) (f) PRE. Rudatis 1646 (2) (f) PRE.
Scharf 1140 (2) (m), 1393, 1419 (2) (f) PRE. Scheepers 1596 (3) (f)
PRE. Schlieben 8749 (3) (f) PRE. B. Schmidt 15 (3) (f) PRE. E. Schmidt
330 (3) (m) PRE. Schmitz 6850, 6851 (1) (m), 9262 (1) (f) PRE.
Schonland 1628 (3) (f) PRE. Shearing 1204 (1) (f) PRE. Silk 264 (3) (f)
KMG. Sim 2101, 20429 (2) (f) PRE. C.A. Smith 440A, 440B, 942 (1)
(f), 4417 (3) (f & m), 4502 (3) (f), 5452 (1) (f) PRE. PA. Smith 2591
(3) (f) PRE. Smuts 1417 (3) (f) PRE. (Mrs) J.C. Smuts PRE43492 (2)
(f) PRE. Smyth PRE43528 (2) (f) KMG, PRE. South 671 (2) (m) PRE.
Speedy 11/22 (3) (m) PRE. Stalmans 621 (5) (f) PRE. Story 101, 137
(1) (f), 1057 (3) (m), 1190 (4) (f), 4585, 4635, 4877, 4981, 5277 (3) (f)
PRE. Strev 3288 (5) (f). 6536 (2) (m). 7660a, 8825, 9713 (2) (f), 9709
(2) (m), 9757 (5) (m) PRE. Sutton 880 (5) (f), 1293 (3) (f) PRE.
Taylor 7111 (3) (m), 10219 (2) (f) PRE. Theiler TRV12362 (5) (f) PRE.
G.C. Theron 345 (1) (m), 815 (3) (f) PRE. G.K. Tlteron 1429 (5) (f)
PRE. J.J. Theron 636 (3) (m) PRE. Thode 2801 (5) (f), A527 (1) (f),
A861 (2) (m), A2479 (2) (f) PRE. Thorne PRE45409 (3) (f) PRE. Tyson
PRE3102, Herb.Marl.8541 (2) (m) PRE.
Van Breda 1147 (2) (f) PRE. Van Dam TRV18856 (2) (f) PRE. Van der
Schijff 6733, 8026 (3) (f) PRE. Van der Spuy 59 (3) (f) PRE. Van Eck 1
(3) (m), 2 (4) (f) PRE. Van Hoepen 1846 (4) (f) PRE. Van Son
TRV28805 (3) (m), TRV28806 (3) (f). TRV31769 (3) (m) PRE. A.E. van
Wyk 1842 (2) (f) PRE. P. van Wyk BSA1I8 (3) (f), BSA992 (5) (f) PRE.
Van Zinderen-Bakker 97 (3) (f), 997 (3) (m), 1063 (1) (f) PRE. F. Venter
933 (2) (f), 2006 (3) (m) PRE. H.J.T Venter 3749 (5) (m), 3750 (5) (f)
PRE. Verdoorn 1002 (1) (f), 1590 (1) (m), 1761 (3) (f). 1762 (3) (m),
PRE30042 (5) (f) PRE. Victor 347 (2) (f), 1452 (1) (f) PRE. A. Viljoen
69 (2) (f) PRE. G. Viljoen 56 (5) (m) PRE. Viviers 167 (2) (m) PRE.
Ward 1402, 2612, 7719 (5) (f), 2611, 2613, 7718 (5) (m) PRE. Walsh
PRE61373 (2) (f) PRE. Werdermann & Oberdieck 1578 (1) (m) PRE.
West 1230 (5) (f), 1804 (5) (m) PRE. White 5101 (2) (f), 10509 (5) (m)
PRE. Williamson 274 (5) (f) PRE. Wilman 1244, PRE43493 (3) (m)
PRE; 1728, KMG11733 (4) (m). 3319, 5990b, 6527 (3) (f) KMG; 5979,
5990, 6268, 6269 (3) (f) KMG. PRE. Wirminghaus 289 (2) (f) PRE.
Wood Herb.Galpin3229 (2) (m) PRE.
Zambatis 669 (5) (f) PRE. Zeyher 819 (2) (m) PRE.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A. Gubb, previously of the McGregor Museum,
Kimberley (KMG), is thanked for his field observations
and for bringing the different taxa in Northern Cape to
our attention. I am grateful to the curators of K, BM and
KMG for sending me material on loan and/or photo
images by e-mail. Dr O.A. Leistner is thanked for the
Latin translations, Ms G. Condy for the line drawings,
Ms A. Romanowski for photographic prints and Mrs S.
Turck for the scanning of micrographs and synflores-
cences from herbarium specimens.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
BEENTJE, H.J. 1999. The genus Tarchonanthus (Compositae-
Mutisieae). Kew Bulletin 54: 81-95.
BURCHELL, W.J. 1824. Travels in the interior of southern Africa, vols
1 & 2. Longman. Hurst. Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, London.
CANDOLLE, A.P. DE. 1836. Compositae. Prodromus 5: 431. Treuttel
& Wiirtz, Paris.
COATES PALGRAVE. K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik
Publishers, Cape Town.
COMPTON, R.H. 1976. The flora of Swaziland. Journal of South
African Botany, Suppl. vol. 11: 622.
DE WINTER, B„ VAHRME1JER. J. & VON BREITENBACH. F.
1978. Die nasionale boomlys / The national list of trees, edn 2.
Van Schaik, Pretoria.
28
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
HARVEY, W.H. 1865. Compositae. Flora capensis 3: 118.
HERMAN, RRJ. 2001. Observations on hairs in the capitula of some
southern African Asteraceae genera. South African Journal of
Botany 67: 65-68.
HERMAN, PPL & CONDY, G. 2001. Tarchonanthus obovatus.
Flowering Plants of Africa 57: 108-112, t. 2180.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1977. Compositae in Natal. University of Natal
Press, Pietermaritzburg.
LEISTNER. O.A. & MORRIS. J.W. 1976. Southern African place
names. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums 12: 257, 486.
LESSING, C.F. 1832. Synopsis generum Compositarum: 208. Duncker
& Humblot, Berlin.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum edn I: 842. Laurentius
Salvius, Stockholm.
MERXMULLER. H. 1967. Asteraceae. Prodromus einer Flora von
Siidwestafrika 139: 176.
MOLL, E. 1992. Trees of Natal. UCT Press, Cape Town.
PAIVA. J.A.R. 1972. New and little known species from the Flora
zambesiaca area. 22. Notes on Inuleae. Boletim da Sociedade
Broteriana (sec. series) 46: 355-381.
PALMER. E. & PITMAN, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa , vol. 3.
Balkema, Cape Town.
POPE, G.V. 1992. 97. Compositae. Flora zambesiaca 6,1: 9-11.
RADFORD, A.E. 1986. Fundamentals of plant systematics. Haiper &
Row, New York.
RADFORD, A.E.. DICKISON, W.C.. MASSEY, J.R. & BELL. C.R.
1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, New York.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common nhmes of South African plants. Memoirs
of the Botanical Suiwey of South Africa No. 35.
TREE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN AFRICA. 1974. Trees and shrubs of
the Witwatersrand. Witwatersrand University Press. Johan-nes-
burg.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1974. Southern Cape forests and trees. The
Government Printer, Pretoria.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK. M.G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. Living-
stone, London.
WELLS, M.J., BALSINHAS, A.A., JOFFE, H.. ENGELBRECHT,
V.M., HARDING. G. & STIRTON, C.H. 1986. A catalogue of
problem plants in southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 53: 509.
Bothalia 32,1: 29-36(2002)
Taxonomy of the Passerina filiformis complex (Thymelaeaceae)
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: anatomy, new species, Passerina , southern Africa, taxonomy. Thymelaeaceae
ABSTRACT
Revision of the genus Passerina L. indicated a new delimitation of taxonomic entities within the Passerina filiformis L.
complex. Evidence from leaf anatomy greatly assisted in the recognition of taxa. P. filiformis is here divided into two sub-
species, namely P. filiformis subsp .filiformis and P. filiformis subsp. glutinosa (Thoday ) Bredenkamp & A.E. van Wyk, and
a new species. P. montivagus Bredenkamp & A.E. van Wyk. which is also described. The new taxa are geographically sep-
arated: subsp. filiformis ranges from Piquetberg in the north through the Cape Peninsula in the south, where it is quite com-
mon, to Attaquaskloof in the southwestern Cape; subsp. glutinosa occurs along the coast between Vredendal and St Helena
Bay; and P. montivagus has a wide distribution from Mossel Bay and Oudtshoorn in the south through Eastern Cape and
along the Great Escarpment northwards to Zimbabwe, with outliers in Tanzania.
INTRODUCTION
Passerina L., a genus of woody shrublets or shrubs,
comprises about 20 species and four subspecies, all con-
fined to southern and eastern Africa (Thoday 1924:
Goldblatt & Manning 2000). With the exception of a few
species growing along the Great Escarpment, most mem-
bers are endemic to the Cape Floristic Region with its
Mediterranean or semi-Mediterranean climate. In the
most recent taxonomic revision of the genus, Thoday
( 1924) considered P . filiformis L. a variable species with
a wide range, noting that plants from KwaZulu-Natal are
more robust and luxuriant in growth. The purpose of the
present paper is to present a taxonomic re-assessment of
the P. filiformis complex based on evidence from epider-
mal structure (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999, 2000), leaf
anatomy (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001a) and floral
morphology (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001b). We pro-
pose the subdivision of P. filiformis L. into two sub-
species and describe a new species; all the new taxa are
geographically separated (allopatric).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
All collections of Passerina in the following herbaria
(acronyms according to Holmgren et al. 1990) were
studied for taxonomy and external morphology: BM.
BOL. BREM, C, GRA. K, LINN, M, MO, NBG, PR,
PRE. PRU, S. SBT. TCD. UPS.
For leaf anatomy, both fresh and herbarium material
were studied. Names of taxa and voucher specimens
used in anatomical studies are listed in Table 1 .
Light microscopy (LM) was used for general leaf
anatomical as well as epidermal studies. Methods for
preparation of transverse sections and for the study of cuti-
cles are described by Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (2000).
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-08-31.
TABLE 1. — Passerina specimens examined anatomically and housed
at PRE
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to study
epidermal surface features (including epicuticular waxes)
and to elucidate the structure of the cuticle (Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk 2000). Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) was used to establish the structure of mucilaginous
epidermal cell walls (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999).
I . Passerina filiformis L., Species plantarum: 559
(1753); Thunb.: 75 (1794); J.C.Wendl.: 18 (1798);
Wikstr.: 324 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825); Meisn.: 562
(1857); C.H. Wright: 10 (1915); Thoday: 159 (1924);
Bond & Goldblatt: 432 (1984); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 1 82
(1987); Goldblatt & J.C.Manning: 683 (2000). Type:
Passerina filiformis , Linnean Herbarium 504.1 (LINN,
lecto.!, here designated).
Passerina phyliformis Hort. Bot. Bonarensis in Herb Zuccarinii (K.
Ml), err. typogr.
P. cupressina J.C.Wendl. nom. nud. Meisn.: 404 (1840); Meisn.:
563 (1857); Thoday: 159 (1924). P. cupressoides Steud.: 273 (1841).
P. pectinata Lodd.: 18 (1816) nom. nud. Wikstr.: 347 (1818);
Meisn.: 404 ( 1840); Meisn.: 562 (1857): Thoday: 159 ( 1924).
Large rounded shrubs up to 2 m high, often lax in shade.
Stems initially greyish tomentose, cork finely grey-brown
tessellate, becoming glabrous, with conspicuous leaf scars
and hair-like, whitish fibres protruding between bark fis-
sures. Leaves sessile, sometimes glutinous, closely adher-
ing to stem or spreading from stem at an angle of ± 30°;
lamina narrow, almost terete, acerose or linear, transverse-
ly elliptic or cordiform in c/s, length x V2 width (because
30
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 1. — A-C. Passerina fili-
formis subsp. filifonnis ,
Bredenkamp 1039: A, inflor-
escence; B, leaf; C, bract.
D-F, P. filifonnis subsp.
glutinosa , Schlechter 5125:
D. inflorescence; E, leaf; F,
bract. G-M, P. montivagus,
Bredenkamp 1327: G, inflor-
escence; H, leaf; I. bract; J,
flower clasped by bract; K,
fruit enveloped by persistent
hypanthium, fragmented at
neck base; L, membranous
pericarp enveloping seed,
remnant of lateral style api-
cally present; M, seed with
black tegmen. Scale bars: 2.0
mm.
lamina is rolled) (4.0— )5.5— 8.0(— 1 0.0) x (0.4 — )0.6— 1 .0 mm.
tapering towards rounded apex, slightly widening or
widening towards base, coriaceous, smooth, dark green to
greyish green, often drying brown; adaxial groove tomen-
tose; abaxial surface convex, glabrous; margin involute.
Inflorescences subterminal, 10-20- flowered, composed of
proliferating spikes. Bracts cymbiform, outside glabrous,
inside setose from base to central part, ovate-acuminate to
widely obovate, length x 'A width ± 4. 6-7. 3 x 1 .5-2.0 mm,
gradually narrowing to point or narrowing abruptly into fil-
iform point, base cuneate to widely cuneate, main vein
strongly developed, often keeled, shortly extended or
extending to form leaf-like point; lamina coriaceous or
chartaceous; wings glabrous, membranous with distinct
venation, margins glabrous or ciliate, often with few tri-
chomes at apex adjacent to filiform point. Flowers gluti-
nous or not. Floral envelope ± 6.0-6. 5 mm long, yellow-
pink during pollination, sparsely tomentose or tomentose at
ovary, neck 1.5-1. 7 mm long, sparsely tomentose or
tomentose; outer and inner sepals with adaxial surface
glabrous, apex abaxially setose; outer sepals concave obo-
vate, inner sepals concave obovate or obovate, ± 2.2-2. 5 x
1 .4—1 .5 mm. Androecium : filament of antipetalous whorl ±
1 . 1-1 .2 mm, antisepalous whorl ± 2.2 mm; anthers ± 0.8 x
0.3 mm. Ovaty ± 2. 3-2. 5 x 0. 5-0.6 mm. Fruit enveloped
by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthium fragmenting at
neck base; pericarp membranous and dry. Flowering time :
in spring when pollen is wafted away in clouds, cause of
hay fever in sensitive persons (Marloth 1925). Figure
1 A-F.
Leaf anatomy
Leaf structural type B: bundle sheath completely
enveloping main vascular bundle, extraxylary scle-
renchyma fibres enclosed in bundle sheath (Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk 2001a).
Leaf outline in transverse section (t/s) cordiform to
transversely elliptic. Adaxial epidermis', cuticular mem-
brane (CM) ± 2 pm thick, periclinal x anticlinal cell
diam. in t/s 15 x 10 pm. Abaxial epidermis , in surface
view, glutinous or not, glabrous, CM mostly exhibiting a
striate pattern, cuticle with epicuticular waxes, wax
plates scarce, oblong, raised 90°, with sharp edges, usu-
ally arranged perpendicular to cell rows, epidermal cells
arranged in rows, oblong, pentagonal to heptagonal in
outline, 45-50 x 30 pm; CM 15-20 pm thick in t/s, pro-
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
31
nounced at junctions of epidermal cell walls, grooved in
midline of joining walls, concavities and convexities pre-
sent. periclinal x anticlinal cell diam. in t/s (35— )40( —45 )
x 45-50(-80) pm, mucilagination of mainly inner tan-
gential cell walls often resulting in mucilage-filled cavi-
ties between remains of epidermal cells and adjacent
mesophyll. Palisade parenchyma horseshoe-shaped, 1-
or 2-layered, density 5 cells per 50 pm. Spongy
parenchyma aerenchymatic. Main vascular bundle
350-420 pm thick. 780-860 pm wide, widely ovate, var-
iously orientated in relation to mesophyll: touching pali-
sade parenchyma abaxially (type B3), sunken into pali-
sade parenchyma (type B4) (Figure 2A) or bordering on
abaxial epidermis (type B6) (Figure 2B). Bundle sheath
completely enveloping vascular bundle, consisting of
13— 15( — 27) cells. Secondary vascular bundles 2-A on
each side of main bundle. Sclerenchymatous hypodermal
sheath absent. Figure 2 A. B.
Two of the four Passerina specimens in the Linnean
Herbarium are named P. filifortnis in the handwriting of
Linnaeus; these specimens are numbered 504. 1 and 504.2
in Savage (1945). Number 504.2 is undoubtedly P.
paleacea Wikstr. Thoday (1924) maintains that number
504.1 is a Clifford specimen and probably the one
Linnaeus saw when he wrote the first edition of Species
plantarum (1753). Savage (1945) added the inscription [?
ex herb. Cliff.], indicating doubt as to the origin of this
specimen. The first author has seen this specimen and
agrees with Thoday ( 1924) that it matches the concept of
P. filiformis perfectly, as it is known in the Cape
Peninsula. The phrase 'Passerina foliis linearibus' in the
Species plantarum (1753), has clearly been copied by
Linnaeus from Hortus Cliffortianus ( 1738) and from Van
Royen (1740). The leaves in the illustration in Hortus
Cliffortianus are ± lanceolate and the bracts are very simi-
lar to those of P. filiformis subsp. glutinosa (Thoday)
Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk stat. nov.. which has acerose
or filiform leaves. The specimen labelled Passerina fili-
formis L. in Clifford’s Herbarium is sterile, lacks charac-
teristic bracts or flowers and could possibly be P. vulgaris
Thoday (= P. filiformis L. subsp. vulgaris Meisn.). P. vul-
garis is the dominant Passerina species in the southern
and southwestern Cape and is constantly confused with P.
filiformis. Specimen 504.1 in the Linnean Herbarium,
which is named P.filifomis by Linnaeus, is here designat-
ed as the lectotype. Thymelaea aethiopica, in Plukenet
(1700: 180), is cited in synonymy under P. filiformis by
Linnaeus (1753). The illustrated synonym of Breyne
(1678) most probably belongs to the genus Phylica L.
(Rhamnaceae) and that of Burman (1739) is clearly a
species of Struthiola L. (Thymelaeaceae).
Etymology, the Latin specific epithet filiformis (=
thread-like) obviously refers to the narrow leaves of this
species. The vernacular name 'sparrow-wort' was sug-
gested by Miller (1768) for all Passerina species, indi-
cating P. filiformis as ‘sparrow- wort with linear convex
leaves’. Wendland (1798) used the German equivalent
fadenformige Vogelkopf Marloth (1925) mentioned the
names kannabcis and kaalgaar. The following Afrikaans
names appear in Smith (1966) and some of them also in
Palmer & Pitman (1972) and Coates Palgrave (1977):
bcikbossie, bakkersbossie, bruingonna, fyntaaibos,
gannabas, gonnabas, kaalgaarbos, kaalgaring , kabel-
garing , kannabas, koordehciar , taaibos, windmakers-
bessie, windmakersbossie .
Key to subspecies
Branchlets and inflorescences dry; bracts widely obovate, nar-
rowing abruptly into filiform point la. subsp. filiformis
Branchlets and inflorescences glutinous; bracts ovate-acumi-
nate, gradually narrowing to point lb. subsp. glutinosa
la. subsp. filiformis
Leaves spreading from stem at angle of ± 30°; lamina
almost terete, cordiform in c/s, length x 'A width
(4.0— )5.5— 8.0(— 1 0.0) x 0. 6-1.0 mm, slightly widening
towards base, dark green to greyish green. Inflorescences
not glutinous. Bracts widely obovate, length x 'A width ±
7.3 x 2.0 mm, base widely cuneate, main vein strongly
developed, often keeled, extending to form a leaf-like
point; lamina chartaceous; margins glabrous, often with
a few trichomes at apex adjacent to filiform point.
Flowers not glutinous. Floral envelope ± 6.0 mm long,
tomentose at ovary, neck 1.7 mm long, tomentose, outer
sepals concave, obovate, inner sepals obovate. Figure
1 A-C.
Leaf anatomy
Leaf outline in t/s transversely elliptic to cordiform.
Adaxial epidermis: CM ± 2 pm thick; periclinal x anti-
clinal cell diam. in t/s 15 x 10 pm. Abaxial epidermis, in
surface view, not glutinous, cells oblong, 45-50 x 30
pm; CM 15-20 pm thick in t/s, periclinal x anticlinal cell
diam. (35— )40( — 45 ) x 45— 50(— 80 ) pm. Palisade paren-
chyma in 1 or 2 layers of elongated cells. Main vascular
bundle 350—420 pm thick. 780-860 pm wide, touching
palisade parenchyma abaxially (type B3) or sunken into
palisade parenchyma (type B4) (Figure 2A). Bundle
sheath consisting of 13-15 cells. Secondary vascular
bundles 3 or 4 on each side of main bundle.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: subsp. fili-
formis is morphologically distinguished by the almost
terete, adaxially grooved, acerose or linear leaves, the
cymbiform, widely obovate floral bracts, which abruptly
narrow to a filiform point (Figure 1A-C), and by the
long (± 1.7 mm) hypanthium neck. As both subsp. fili-
formis and P. vulgaris occur in the Cape Peninsula, they
are often confused. Diagnostic characters of P. vulgaris
include linear to narrowly lanceolate leaves, the dia-
mond-shaped bracts and leaves with a hypodermal scle-
renchymatous sheath (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001a).
Some specimens of subsp. filiformis with incurved,
tapering leaves and the necks of the hypanthium exsert-
ed from the clasping, veined bracts, could be mistaken
for P. falcifolia. The apical beard on the young leaves
and outer sepals and the glabrous inner sides of the bracts
are reliable diagnostic characters, distinguishing the
subsp .filiformis from P. falcifolia.
Etymology and uses: according to Van Wyk & Gericke
(2000) the name bakkerbos commemorates an era in the
Cape when the official licensed bakers used the branches
32
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 2. — LM photographs and SEM micrographs showing leaf anatomy and epidermal structure of selected species in Passerina: A, P. fili-
formis subsp. filiformis, Bredenkamp 1039 , leaf in t/s, illustrating leaf structural type B4. B, C, P.filiformis subsp. glutinosa , Schlechter
5125: B, leaf in t/s, from rehydrated herbarium material, illustrating leaf structural type B6; C, glutinous substance sticking pollen grain
to leaf surface. D, P. montivagus , Bredenkamp 1016 , leaf in t/s illustrating leaf structural type C. E-H, abaxial epidermis in P. montiva-
gus: E, in surface view, with cells arranged in rows, Bredenkamp 1012 ; F, epidermal cells oblong, pentagonal to heptagonal, Bredenkamp
1016 ; G, upright epicuticular wax platelets, Bredenkamp 1016. H, mucilagination of inner tangential cell walls, resulting in mucilage-
filled cavities, Killick 238. ad, adaxial epidermis; ab, abaxial epidermis; bs, bundle sheath; m, mucilage; mb, median vascular bundle; pi,
epicuticular wax plates; pp, palisade parenchyma; sp, spongy parenchyma. Scale bars: A, B, D-F, H, 100 pm; C, G, 10 pm.
Bothalia 32. 1 (2002)
33
17° 18c 19° 20° 21° 22° 23°
FIGURE 3. — Known distribution of
P. filiformis subsp. filiformis.
and leaves of this plant to heat their ovens. The plants
used at that time were clearly the subsp. filiformis. When
ignited, plants of subsp. filiformis disappear in a blaze of
hot flame owing to a waxy secretion on the leaves (Smith
1966). The plants were formerly used for heating up
stoves. Today it is quite scarce in the vicinity of Cape
Town, because of the commercial use of this once abun-
dant resource. At maturity, these plants are quite orna-
mental and have been cultivated in Britain and Europe
since the time of Linnaeus. Plants of the subsp .filiformis
are soboliferous and vigorous resprouters. They are well
adapted to the Cape climate and would be suitable for
reclamation plantings in areas where alien invasive vege-
tation has been cleared. The tough bark was used by
indigenous peoples instead of twine (Marloth 1925).
According to Laidler (1928) a decoction of this plant is
used by the rural people of the Cape for shooting pains.
Distribution and ecology. P. filiformis subsp. fili-
formis is common in the Cape Peninsula and is distrib-
uted from Piquetberg, across the Hex River Mountains,
to Attaquaskloof in the southwestern Cape. It grows in
rocky areas, mostly on south-facing mountain slopes and
on sandy plains, such as the Rietvallei and Stellenbosch
Flats. Figure 3.
Conservation status : Least Concern (LC) (IUCN
Species Survival Commission 2000).
lb. subsp. glutinosa (Thoday) Bredenkamp & A.E.
van Wyk, stat. nov.
TYPE. — Malmesbury Div., around Langeenheid Sta-
tion. Thoday 215 (BOL!; NBG. lecto.!. here designated).
P. filiformis L. var. glutinosa Thoday in Kew Bulletin 4: 1 60 (1924).
Leaves glutinous, closely adhering to stem or spread-
ing at angle of ± 30°; lamina narrow, acerose or linear,
transversely elliptic in c/s, length x ‘/2 width ± 7.0 x 0.4
mm, tapering towards rounded apex, widening towards
base, dark green, drying brown. Inflorescences glutinous,
somewhat longer than in typical subspecies. Bracts ovate-
acuminate, gradually narrowing to point, length x '/2
width ± 4.6 x 1 .5 mm. base cuneate. main vein strongly
developed: lamina coriaceous; wings membranous, with
distinct venation; margins often ciliate. Flowers gluti-
nous. Floral envelope ± 6.5 mm long, sparsely tomentose
at ovary, neck 1 .5 mm long, sparsely tomentose, outer and
inner sepal lobes concave-obovate. Figure 1D-F.
Thoday 215 in NBG was chosen as lectotype because
of the longer inflorescences and the conspicuously gluti-
nous, narrow leaves. Duplicates of the syntype of var.
glutinosa. Schlechter 5125. from BM. C, K. MO. PRE
and S were seen. Although these specimens agree close-
ly with the concept of var. glutinosa (Thoday 1924). the
glutinous character is not evident in the dried specimens.
Leaf anatomy
Leaf outline in t/s transversely elliptic. Adaxial epi-
dermis with CM ± 2 pm thick; periclinal x anticlinal cell
diam. in t/s 15 x 10 pm. Abaxial epidermis , in surface
view, glutinous (Figure 2C), cells slightly oblong. 50 x
30 pm; CM 15 pm thick in t/s. periclinal x anticlinal cell
diam. 40 x 55 pm. Palisade parenchyma in 2 layers of
elongated cells. Main vascular bundle ± 400 pm thick. ±
820 pm wide, sunken into palisade parenchyma abaxial-
ly (type B4) or bordering on abaxial epidermis (type B6)
(Figure 2B). Bundle sheath consisting of ± 27 cells,
adaxially radiating outwards, abaxially tanniniferous,
specializing into collenchyma in contact with abaxial
epidermis. Secondary vascular bundles 2 or 3 on each
side of main bundle.
Distribution and ecology, subsp. glutinosa occurs in
the Strandveld (Acocks 1988). from Doring Bay in the
north to St Helena Bay in the south. The vegetation sur-
rounding Doring Bay is described as Strandveld
Succulent Karoo by Hoffman ( 1998). The area is charac-
terized by deep, calcareous, coastal Quaternary sands
and generally low rainfall. St Helena Bay is situated in
the Sand Plain Fynbos (Rebelo 1998). This part of the
range has a Mediterranean-type climate with summer
drought and deep acid sands. Sand Plain Fynbos is a
highly endangered vegetation type because of urbaniza-
tion and the impact of alien invasive plant species
(Rebelo 1998). Figure 4.
Conservation status: Near Threatened (NT) (IUCN
Species Survival Commission 2000).
34
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
17° 18° 19° 20°
FIGURE 4. — Known distribution of P.filiformis subsp. glutinosa.
2. Passerina montivagus Bredenkamp & A.E.vcm
Wyk , sp. nov., a P.filiforme L. habitu robustiore et luxu-
riantiore distinguenda. Folia cymbiformia, secus nervum
medium plicata, lanceolata, ad apicem rotundatum
decrescentia, basi expansa. Bracteae cymbiformes,
ovatae ad obovatae, extra glabrae, intra basaliter setosae,
in carinam longam, fere cylindricam, adaxialiter sul-
catam, leviter incurvam gradatim decrescentes, basi
cuneatae, coriaceae, sed lateris vel alis chartaceis, plus
minusve tricostatis, marginibus trichomatibus conspicuis
crassis serialibus secus dimidium distalem obsitis.
TYPE. — KwaZulu-Natal, 2930 (Pietermaritzburg):
hills above Pinetown, 2400 ft, (-DD), 3 December 1891 .
J.M. Wood in PRE49409 (PRE!, holo.; MO!, iso.).
Passerina fdiformis L.: 559 (1753) pro parte, excluding type;
Thunb.: 75 (1794); Wikstr.: 324 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825); Meisn.:
562 (1857); C.H. Wright: 10 (1915); Thoday: 159 (1924); Bond &
Goldblatt: 432 (1984); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 182 (1987); Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning: 683 (2000).
Low, spreading shrub l(-2) m high, vigorous re-
sprouter. Stems initially greyish tomentose, cork Assur-
ing lengthwise into fine, dark grey, tomentose strips,
older branchlets glabrous, with conspicuous leaf scars.
Leaves sessile, spreading from stem at angle of ± 45°;
main vein sturdy; lamina cymbiform, folded along main
vein, lanceolate, often slightly falcate, length x '/2 width
5.6-7.0(-8.0) x 0. 7-1.0 mm, tapering towards rounded
apex, expanded at base, ciliate, coriaceous, smooth,
greyish green; adaxial surface tomentose; abaxial surface
glabrous; margin involute. Inflorescences subterminal,
1 0-20-flowered, composed of proliferating spikes, com-
mon. Brads cymbiform, outside glabrous, inside basally
setose; lamina coriaceous, ovate to obovate, length x '/2
width ± 6.3 x 1.6 mm, narrowing gradually into sturdy,
leaf-like point of extended main vein, base cuneate;
wings chartaceous ± 3-ribbed, obscurely veined, greyish
green, margins conspicuously lined with strong white tri-
chotnes along distal half, often reaching up lo apex.
Floral envelope ± 6.6 mm long, yellow-pink during pol-
lination, tomentose at upper half of ovary, neck tomen-
tose ± 2.3 mm long; adaxial surface of outer and inner
sepals glabrous, apex setose abaxially; outer sepals
cymbiform, inner sepals obovate, ± 2.1 x 1.3 mm.
Androecium: filament of antipetalous whorl ± 0.8 mm
long, antisepalous whorl ± 1 .7 mm long; anthers ± 0.8 x
0.3 mm. Ovaiy ± 2.2 x 0.7 mm. Fruit enveloped by per-
sistent, loosely arranged hypanthium fragmented at neck
base; pericarp membranous and dry. Figure 1G-M.
Thoday (1924) noted that plants named P. filiformis in
KwaZulu-Natal are more robust and luxuriant than those
from Western Cape. Wood s.n. from Pinetown was cho-
sen as the holotype of P. montivagus as it is a good rep-
resentation of the new taxon and was determined and
cited by Thoday ( 1924).
Leaf anatomy
Leaf structural type C: bundle sheath capping main
vascular bundle adaxially, ± absent abaxially, extraxylary
sclerenchyma fibres not enclosed in bundle sheath, main
vascular bundle bordering on palisade parenchyma,
extraxylary sclerenchyma fibres fitting into V-shaped
palisade parenchyma (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001a).
Leaf outline in t/s carinate. Adaxial epidermis: CM ±
2 pm thick, periclinal x anticlinal cell diam. in t/s 25 x
15 pm. Abaxial epidermis , in surface view: cuticle with
epicuticular waxes, wax plates scarce, ± perpendicular to
cell rows, oblong, raised 90°, with sharp edges (Figure
2G), CM mostly exhibiting a striate pattern, epidermal
cells arranged in rows (Figure 2E), oblong, pentagonal to
heptagonal (Figure 2F), 30-55 x 25-35 pm; CM ± 20
pm thick in t/s, pronounced at junctions of epidermal cell
walls, grooved in midline of joining walls, concavities
and convexities present, periclinal x anticlinal cell diam.
(22.5— )30.0(— 35.0) x (40— )55(— 90) pm, mucilagination
of mainly inner tangential cell walls often resulting in
mucilage-filled cavities between remains of epidermal
cells and adjacent mesophyll (Figure 2H). Palisade
parenchyma V-shaped, in 2 layers of elongated cells,
density 3 or 4 cells per 50 pm. Spongy parenchyma
aerenchymatic. Bundle sheath an adaxial cap of ± 21
cells, rounded. Main vascular bundle (400-)560-630
(-700) pm thick, (820— )980— 1 1 80(— 1 280) pm wide,
obovate, bordering on and fitting into the V-shaped pali-
sade parenchyma (type C) (Figure 2D). Extraxylary scle-
renchyma fibres not enclosed in bundle sheath.
Secondary vascular bundles 3 or 4 on each side of main
bundle. Sclerenchymatous hypodermal sheath absent.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
montivagus is easily distinguished from P. filiformis by
its more robust and luxuriant habit. Furthermore, for
some distance below the inflorescences, the foliage
leaves are expanded at the base and the bracts are ovate
to obovate, narrowing gradually into a sturdy, leaf-like
point, with margins along their distal half conspicuously
fringed by strong white trichomes. P. montivagus could
also be confused with P . falcifolia, but it is distinguished
from the latter by the apical beard on the young leaves
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
35
10' 15* 20* 25* 30" 35* 40-
FIGURE 5. — Known distribution of P. montivagus.
and outer sepals and by the adaxial surfaces of the bracts,
which are basally setose with glabrous wings.
Etymology : the specific epithet is a compound of the
Latin montanus (= pertaining to mountains) and vagus (=
in several directions), referring to the distribution of this
species. Von Breitenbach et al. (2001) uses the names
brown gonna (English), bruingonna (Afrikaans) and
unwele oluncane (Zulu) for P. filiformis in the wide
sense, but these names are most appropriate for P. mon-
tivagus because of its wide distribution.
Distribution and ecology : Passerina montivagus has a
wide distribution, from Mossel Bay and Oudtshoorn in
Western Cape northwards mainly along the Great
Escarpment to KwaZulu-Natal. Swaziland. Mpuma-
langa, Northern Province, Mozambique and Zimbabwe.
Polhill & Paolo 2372, from Tanzania, represents an
extreme form of this taxon, as the bracts are smaller and
almost diamond-shaped. The most southwesterly distri-
bution of this species is in the southern Cape, a region
transitional between winter and summer rainfall.
However, over most of its range, the species receives
summer rainfall. Because of its wide distribution, espe-
cially along the Great Escarpment, P. montivagus is
adapted to a variety of habitats, with relatively high rain-
fall. It is often found along forest margins in the ecoton-
al zone between Afromontane forest and grassland. It has
been recorded from rocky mountain peaks and slopes,
river valleys, gorges and among riverside rocks. In
coastal regions, it grows on hills and often borders small
tributaries of streams flowing to the sea. Figure 5.
Story (1952) reported that P. montivagus (= P. fili-
formis) dominated the western half of a small plateau
north of the Mount McDonald beacon in the
Keiskammahoek District. The plants were not browsed
by stock although the plateau was heavily grazed. He
regarded the species as ‘useless’ and advised that it
should be eradicated by hand, as it was not dense enough
to burn without additional fuel. This Fynbos species, dis-
tributed along the Great Escarpment has not been report-
ed as undesirable or invasive and is currently not regard-
ed as a threat, although it might be a dominant species in
restricted areas.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (IUCN
Species Survival Commission 2000).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Abbott 43, 308 (2) PRE. Acocks 11549 (2) PRE; 19671 (lb) K, M,
NBG. PRE; 24062 (lb) PRE; 890, 5174, 5754 (la) S. Andraea 1165
( la) NBG, PRE. Anferweg 850 ( la) PR.
Barker 5795, 8095 (la) MO. NBG. Bolus 2440 (2) BOL, K; 2925 (la)
BOL. K. Botha 1445 (2) PRE. Boucher 2833 (lb) PRE. Bredenkamp
1012, 1015 (2) PRE; 1016, 1017. 1327, 1359, 1360 (2) PRE; 1039 ( la)
PRE. Bremer 317 (2) PRE. S. Buchenau s.n. ( la) BREM. Buitendag 712
(2) NBG. PRE. Burchel 66, 276. 6544 (la) K. Burmeister s.n. (la) SBT.
Cheadle & Welts 668 (2) M. PRE. Compton 11762, 14827 ( la) NBG;
15888 (lb) NBG; 25157 (2) NBG; 26157, 29473 (2) NBG. PRE.
Dlamini s.n. (2) NBG, PRE. Dr'ege s.n. (la) K.
Ecklon s.n. (la) PR. Edwards 820 (2) PRE. Esterliuysen 26437, 34096.
35680 (la) BOL. MO. M. S.
Forbes & Obermeyer 58 (2) PRE. Fourcade 3473 (2) NBG; 4809 (2)
BOL.
Galpin 11016 (2) PRE. Garthside 17 (la) K. Germishuizen 1705, 9089
(2) PRE. Gerrard 1478(\a) BM. TCD, K. Gill s.n. (la) K. Gillett4537
(2) BOL. PRE. Goodier & Phipps 270 (2) MO. Goodier 637 (2) BM.
M. PRE. Grant 1 (la) C. Hardy s.n. (la) K, S. Herb. Linairiaro (la)
PR. Herb. Regium Monacense s.n. ( la) M. Herb. Rofski (la) PR. Herb
Zuccarinii s.n. (la) M. Hilliard & Burtt 14463 (2) PRE; 14654 (2) K;
Hilliard & Burn 15671 (2) N. PRE, S; Hilliard & Burtt 18772A (2) K,
S. Hugo 2019 (2) PRE; 2086 (2) NBG, PRE. Huntley 612 (2) MO.
PRE. Hutchinson 258 ( la) PRE; 1298 (2) PRE.
Joffe 576 (2) TCD. PRE.
Keet s.n. (2) NBG. PRE. Killick 238, 3469 (2) PRE. Krebs 282 (la)
MO. Kutzelman’s Herbarium, Prague (la) PR.
Lehman 1891 ( la) C. Lewis 4064, s.n. (2) NBG. Luidberg s.n. (la) S.
MacOwen 16388 (2) BM; s.n. (2) MO. Mantel! & Vassilatos 32 (2) PRE.
McKinnon 32 (la) NBG. Medical Soc. Univ. (la) K. Meebold 15156,
15157 (2) M. Mogg 13350 (2) K. PRE; 5206, 13397, 38026, (2) PRE.
Morris 441 (2) NBG. Moss 5643, T10 (la) BM. Mund & Maire s.n. ( la)
K. Museum Bot. Hauniense (la) C. Niven & Laubert s.n. (la) S.
Pappe s.n. (la) NBG. Pedro & Pedergao 7310 (2) BOL. Pegler 1273
(2) BOL. GRA, NBG. PRE. Penther 1912, s.n. (la) S. WU; 1919 (2)
M. S. Phillipson 1200 (2) MO, PRE. Polhill & Paolo 2372 (2) PRE.
Prior s.n. (la) K.
Rob & Fries 3393. 3396-3399 (la) UPS, S. Roberts 66, s.n. (2) S.
Rogers 16701 B (la) PRE. Rudatis 1204 (2) BM. PR, S.
Schlechter 5125 (lb) BM. C. K. MO. PRE. S. Schmidt 568 (la) M.
Sidey 3862 (2) PRE, S. Sikhakhane 524 (2) PRE. Sparrman s.n. ( la) S.
Story 3765 (2) GRA. PRE. Strev 7112, 11363, 11364 (2) PRE; Strey
9321 (2) PRE. S.
Talbot s.n. (la) K. Taylor 1542 (lb) NBG. PRE. Thoday 215 (,1b) BOL.
NBG. Thode 4657 (2) NBG. Thom 553. 577 (la) K. Thompson 41 ( lb)
NBG, S; 801 (lb) NBG PRE. Trinity College s.n. (la) TCD. Tyson
1287 (2) MO. NBG; 2621 (2) NBG.
Van derMerwe 1101 (la) PRE. Van Wvk 2622 (2) PRE. PRU, M; 5332,
BSA2586 (2) PRE, PRU. Van Wyk & Bredenkamp 1 (2) PRE, PRU. Van
Wvk & Matthews 77719 (2) K. PRU. Victor 556 (2) PRE. Vincent &
Wearne 4 Cl) PRE.
36
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Wall 1060 (la) S. Ward 8832 (2) N. PRE. 10669 (2) PRE Wells 1809
(2) MO. Wolley-Dod , 3103 (la) K. Wood 1182 (2) BOL; 8938 (2) MO:
s.n. (2) MO, PRE. Worsdell s.n. (la) K. Wright s.n. ( la) MO. Without
collector. K692 (la).
Cultivated: Hort. Herb. Pallas (la) BM; Hort. Prague (la) PR: Vinaf
s.n. (la) PR.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Ms G. Condy for the
line drawings, Dr O.A. Leistner for translating the diag-
nosis into Latin and Ms A. Romanowski for printing the
photographs.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS. J PH 1988. Veld types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survery of South Africa No. 57: 85-87.
BOND. P. & GOLDBLATT. P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora: a
descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany, Suppl.
vol. 13.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 1999. Structure of muci-
laginous epidermal cell walls in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae).
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 129: 223-238.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2000. The epidermis in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic
significance. Bothalia 30: 69-86.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001a. Leaf anatomy of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): taxonomic and ecological
significance. Bothalia 31: 53-70.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001b. Taxonomic signifi-
cance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia 31: 213-236.
BREYNE. J. 1678. Exoticarum plantarum centuria. Rhetius, Gdansk.
BURMAN. J. 1739. Rariorum africanarum plantarum. Boussiere,
Amsterdam.
COATES PALGRAVE. K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik.
Johannesburg.
GOLDBLATT. P. & MANNING. J.C. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus
of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT. B.L 1987. The botany of the southern
Natal Drakensberg. Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic
Gardens 15.
HOFFMAN. M.T. 1998. Strandveld Succulent Karoo. In A.B. Low &
A.G. Rebelo, Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and
Swaziland: 59. Department of Environmental Affairs &
Tourism, Pretoria.
HOLMGREN, K„ HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT. L.C. 1990.
Index Herbariorum. International Association for Plant
Taxonomy, New York Botanical Garden, New York.
IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION 2000. IUCN Red List
Categories. A.? approved by the 5 1'1 Meeting of the IUCN
Council. Gland. Switzerland.
LAIDLER, P.W. 1928. The magic medicine of the Hottentots. South
African Journal of Science 25: 433—447.
LINNAELIS. C. 1738 (‘1737')- Hortus Cliffortianus. Amsterdam.
LINNAEUS. C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1: 559. Salvius,
Stockholm.
LODDIGES, C. 1816. Catalogue of plants. Plummer & Brewis. London.
MARLOTH. R 1925. The flora of South Africa, vol. 2,2. Darter. Cape
Town.
MEISNER, C.F. 1840. Passerina L. Linnaea 14: 390-404.
MEISNER, C.F. 1857. Ordo CLXVII. Thymelaeaceae. In A.L.P.P. de
Candolle. Prodromus systematis naturalis 14: 493-605.
Masson, Paris.
MILLER, P. 1768. The gardener's dictionary, edn 18. London.
PALMER. E. & PITMAN. N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa, vol. 3.
Balkema, Cape Town.
PLUKENET. L. 1700. Almagesti botanici mantissa. Sumptibus autoris,
London.
REBELO. A.G. 1998. Fynbos Biome. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo.
Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: 62-74.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
SAVAGE, S. 1945. A catalogue of the Linnaean Herbarium. Linnean
Society of London.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common names of South African plants. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 35: 589.
STEUDEL. E.G. VON. 1841. Nomenclator botanicus, edn 2. Cottae.
Stuttgart.
STORY. R 1952. A botanical survey of the Keiskammahoek District.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 27: 1-184.
THODAY. D. 1924. XVIII. A revision of Passerina. Kew Bulletin 4:
146-168.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium, part 1.
Edman. Uppsala.
THUNBERG. C.P. 1825. CXXIX Passerina. In I. A. Schultes, Flora
capensis 2: 374-378. Cottae, Stuttgardt.
VAN ROYEN, A. 1740. Florae leydensis prodromus. Leyden.
VAN WYK. B-E. & GERICKE. N. 2000. People's plants. Briza
Publications, Pretoria.
VON BREITENBACH. J„ DE WINTER. B.. POYNTON. R.. VAN
DEN BERG. E„ VAN WYK. B. & VAN WYK. E. 2001. Pocket
list of southern African indigenous trees: including selected
shrubs and woody climbers, edn 4, 1st abridged impression.
Briza Publications & Dendrological Foundation, Pretoria.
WENDLAND. J.C. 1798. Botanische Beobaclitungen. Gebriidern
Hahn, Hannover.
WIKSTROM, J.E. 1818. Granskning af de till Thymelaearum
Vaxtordning horande Slagten och Arter. Kunglinga Svenska
Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar: 265-355.
WRIGHT. C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5.2: 1-81. Reeve. London.
Bothalia 32,1: 37-61 (2002)
The genus Erica (Ericaceae) in southern Africa: taxonomic notes 1
E.G.H. OLIVER* and I.M. OLIVER*
Keywords: Erica L„ nomenclature, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
This is the first in a series of notes on the southern African species of Erica L. which are currently recognized. Brief
synonymy citing only the important revisions and synonyms is given, as well as comments on the status and diagnostic char-
acters of each species. One new species. E. petrusiana E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv. and 14 new subspecies are described, and
11 species are reduced to subspecific status. Where necessary drawings of important features and variations are given. Part
1 covers the first 35 species (Sections 1-3).
INTRODUCTION
The last revision of the genus Erica L. covering the
species in southern Africa was undertaken by Dulfer
(1965) and published as a brief conspectus — excluding
descriptions and with very little or no discussion about
problems of delimitation and the decisions he took. All
of this was based almost exclusively on the very small
collection of Erica housed in the Natural History
Museum in Vienna (W), in many cases with species rep-
resented by only one or two specimens. He had only a
few small loans from the Bolus Herbarium (BOL) and
the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K), having been
refused large loans. His work was based on that of
Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capensis (1905) and included
the 220 species described since that publication. We esti-
mate that he had far less material on which to base his
decisions than did Guthrie & Bolus, who also consulted
the large collections at Kew and the Natural History
Museum, London (BM) and also at Trinity College,
Dublin (TCD). Bolus also consulted the important
Ericaceae collections in Berlin, which, except for the
Willdenow herbarium, were totally destroyed during
World War II. Fortunately he was allowed to remove a few
flowers from several of the types and these are in BOL.
Dulfer’s work is valuable in that he spent much time
checking the synonymy and old references that Guthrie
& Bolus had put together. This remains a much used
source of reference in our work on Erica. Since Dulfer’s
revision, another 63 species have been added, and all the
species formerly included under the 23 minor genera
have also been added, with the relegation of these genera
to synonymy under Erica (Oliver 1988, 1993a, 1993b.
2000). The number of species in the genus currently
stands at 765 in the area covered by the Flora of south-
ern Africa. The number of specimens located in the two
Cape herbaria. Bolus Herbarium (BOL) and the
Compton Herbarium (NBG), which now includes the old
South African Museum Herbarium (SAM) and
Government Herbarium. Stellenbosch (STE), greatly
increases the amount of material that exhibits variation,
compared to that which was available for Guthrie &
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7.
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2001-11-21.
Bolus and considerably more so in the case of Dulfer.
Having studied the genus in the herbarium and in the
field for 42 years (EGHO) and 15 years (IMO) respec-
tively, we are in a position to update the species concepts
currently recognized in the literature (Dulfer 1965;
Oliver & Van Wyk 1993), and to publish our concepts
which are incorporated as curatorial practice in the
Compton Herbarium (NBG).
It has been decided to produce a series of taxonomic
notes on the species following the short format used by
Dulfer, but with short to detailed explanations of varia-
tions, of problems with delimitation and of new delimi-
tation of some taxa. Where necessary illustrations of the
variable taxa have been included. We have followed the
numbered order started by Guthrie & Bolus (1905) and
adapted by Dulfer (1965) and then by ourselves in the
Compton Herbarium. This system follows the sectional
arrangement used by Guthrie & Bolus in which the genus
is divided into 43 sections based on the earlier work of
Bentham (1839). These sections were an attempt to
group the species into supposedly related assemblages.
In some cases this is clearly the case, but in others there
are no close relationships and species are. in our opinion,
sometimes widely separated from their nearest relatives.
An example is a species which was described twice by
Guthrie & Bolus (1905), firstly as E. auriculata , which is
no. 135, and secondly as E. greyii, which is no. 338.
This sectional/species arrangement is used here for
want of a better, natural system which is as yet not forth-
coming. The available morphological characters are not
sufficiently adequate for this puipose due to the high
degree of homoplasy present within the genus. To
attempt to resolve this impasse, a study is to be under-
taken into the molecular relationships of some 300
species in collaboration with overseas researchers to try
to ascertain the basic clades within the genus and to cou-
ple this with an analysis of morphological characters.
These results should give a good indication as to which
the important morphological characters are in a reassess-
ment of the genus at the level of subgenus and section.
In a few cases the species have not been fully resolved
and we are forced to list these in complexes under the
oldest name with pointers towards the problems that
need to be resolved through more detailed fieldwork and
molecular studies.
The genus Erica is by far the largest represented in the
Cape Flora and it is, in our opinion, clearly still evolving
38
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
actively. There are many species which are isolated in
their relationships, and these one may regard as
palaeoendemics, whereas there are many that form
extremely complicated complexes that currently, and
perhaps always will, defy satisfactory resolution.
To date, the only subspecific category that has been
used in the main revisions is that of variety (varietas).
With the current trend to drop that category, we have
resorted to recognizing worthy subspecific groupings as
subspecies, especially when there is, in addition to some
morphological disjunction, also a disjunction in distribu-
tion, ecology or postulated pollination biology. In other
cases we have refrained from a proliferation of sub-
species and have resorted to listing unnamed variants
which reflect what we believe are low level groupings
that have been noted by us.
The concentration of so many species in the Cape
Floral Region is shown in counts we have done. Often
we have found four species growing in one square metre
with the highest count thus far obtained being seven, or,
in one case, four species in a quarter square metre — all not
closely related species. In a number of cases the disjunc-
tions between taxa can occur over very short distances
with variants being confined to relatively small areas.
With such a large genus — currently 760 species in
southern Africa, we are forced to publish this review in a
series of parts covering a varying number of species per
part depending on the complexity of the species and the
species complexes in order to provide data on species
delimitation soon, rather than wait many years for a com-
plete coverage of all 680 capsular species in one publi-
cation. The 84 indehiscent fruited species have recently
been dealt with in detail (Oliver 2000).
NOTE 1 : in the numbering system the whole numbers
for the species are those that were originally allocated by
Guthrie & Bolus (1905). The species described since
then until 1965 were placed by Dulfer nearest their sup-
posedly nearest ally as a & b numbers. These we have
altered to decimal notation since we use the a/b notation
for subspecies. Species described since Dulfer’s 1965
revision have been placed by us in their postulated
alliances. Species we recognize are printed in bold
Roman type. Those that are reduced to synonymy, or that
we regard as cultivated forms, or dubious, are printed in
bold italics.
NOTE 2: the inclusion under the synonymy of cita-
tions of publications additional to the original one, is
restricted to the most important revisions of the genus.
For all other citations and more detailed synonymy, ref-
erence should be made to Guthrie & Bolus ( 1905) and to
Dulfer (1965).
NOTE 3: in the case of citations involving the two
works of Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths
(1794-71830) and The Heathery (1804-1812), the rele-
vant work has to be cited in full in each instance, due to
the considerable overlapping of publication dates (see
Cleevely & Oliver 2002), and cannot be cross-referenced
in the references.
ERICA COCC1NEA COMPLEX
This complex, consisting of E. coccinea, E. melas-
toma, E. intermedia and E. monadelpliia, is character-
ized by an enlarged petaloid bract and bracteoles
adpressed to the calyx, long, attenuated, well-exserted
anthers with rounded apices and basal attachment, the
often flap-like placenta with a naked abaxial zone, shiny
smooth seeds (not alveolate or reticulate) and leaves with
a large sclerenchyma bundle on either side of the sul-
cus— these visible as white stripes in fresh or pressed
material.
The inflorescence consists of 3-nate flowers, except in
E. melastoma where they are borne singly.
The ‘ coccinea ’ complex’s nearest relatives are the
species belonging to the small-flowered E. imbricata
complex (no. 369) and not to any of the other large-flow-
ered species, e.g. E. plukenetii , where similarities are the
result of convergent evolution in pollination syndromes.
It is at times difficult to differentiate between the various
species, especially in the dmbricata-placentiflora ’ com-
plex which has evolved numerous variants and in some
cases these are sympatric, thus adding to the confusion.
There could very well be a case for considering
hybridization between some of these variants.
These two complexes cover a wide range of flower
sizes from a large tubular corolla ± 20 mm long, to a
small globose one ± 2 mm long. The pollination syn-
dromes vary from bird pollination in the large-flowered
species to insect and wind pollination in the small-flow-
ered species.
Erica banksii is very similar to members of this com-
plex, but lacks the distinctive sclerenchyma bundles in
the leaves, and the anthers have the filaments attached
more or less dorsally.
1. E. coccinea L., Species plantarum edn 1,1: 355
(1753); Salter: 633 (1951) p.p.; Dulfer: 28 (1965) p.p.
Lectotype: Seba: t. 21, fig. 4 (1735), selected here by
Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty.
Note: a paper covering the typification of all Linnaean names of
Cape Erica spp. is in preparation by Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty.
Diagnostic features : corolla tubular, ± 16-22 mm
long; bract, bracteoles and sepals with long narrow sul-
cus; anthers far exserted; leaves recurved.
la. subsp. coccinea
E. petiveri L.: 10, t. 50 (1770); Benth.: 621 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 47 (1905). Lectotype: L., t. 50, selected here by Oliver. Jarvis &
Cafferty, in prep.
E. sebana Donn: 45 (1796) nom. nud., et auct. mult.
E. petiveri var. pubescens Bolus: 47 ( 1 905 ); E. coccinea var. pubes-
cens (Bolus) Dulfer: 29 (1965). Type: Stellenbosch Div., Lowry's Pass,
Burchell 8246 (Kl); Hottentots Holland Niven 129 (K!); Caledon Div..
Houw Hoek. Burchell 8130 (K!); Div.?, Bolus 8036 (BOL!).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 1, 1-7 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
35, t. 2 & 37, t. 2 (1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 2 (2000).
Diagnostic features: leaves small, closely packed and
recurved; flowers 3-nate on ends of short, leafy, side
branches, red, orange, yellow or green and usually uni-
coloured (Figure 1 A i , A2).
A yellow-flowered variant with long narrow sepals
which has a dark corolla mouth, occurs in the Bredas-
dorp to Gansbaai area.
The typical subspecies is the common and widespread
taxon in this species occurring from the Cederberg to the
Cape Peninsula and eastwards as far as the Kammanassie
Mountains.
Vouchers: Balfour s.n. (MO!, NBG!); Bolus 6758 (BOL!, NBG!);
Compton 23683 (NBG!, S!); Johnson 304 (K!, NBG!); Lewis 5300
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
39
flowers . 4mm
anthers. 2mm
FIGURE 1. — Erica coccinea complex: flowers and anthers. Ai, A;, E. coccinea subsp. coccinea: Ai, Baker 42, Constantiaberg; Aj, Baker 2014,
Elim. B|-B4, E. melastoma subsp. melastoma : B,, variant D, Oliver 10676: B2, variant E, Kirsten 811, De Tronk; B ,, variant A, Oliver
8013, Caledon Swartberg; B4, variant B. Oliver 11287. Klein River Mtns. B5, E. melastoma subsp. minor. Baker 1250, Baardskeerdersbos.
C, E. monadeiphia, De Vos 648, Kleinmond. Di, D;, E. intermedia: Di, subsp. intermedia, from type, Niven 127', D2, subsp. albiflora,
Oliver 9105, Ruitersberg. E, c/s leaf. Scale bars: flowers, 4 mm; anthers, 2 mm; E, 250 pm.
(BM!, NBG!, PRE); MacOwan sub Herb. Norm. 5 (BM!, K!, SAM!);
Middlemost 1556 (NBG!, NY!); Oliver STE30141 (BM!. BOLL NBG!,
PRE), STE30142 (NBG!, PL PRE); Zeyher 3185 (BOLL KL PL PRE,
SAM!, W).
lb. subsp. uniflora E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., flore uno foliis suberectis ad recurvatis dis-
tinguitur.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Springfield,
(-DB ), 12 January 1958, Rycroft2104 (NBG, holo.; K, PRE).
Diagnostic features: flowers borne singly at ends of
short, leafy lateral branches, usually yellow, sometimes
orange-red; leaves semi-erect to reflexed.
This is a lowland taxon occurring on hills and flats not
far from the coast from the Cape Peninsula eastwards to
near Mossel Bay.
Paratype material (selection from numerous collections): WEST-
ERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Karbonkelberg. 1500 ft [450 m],
(-AB), 21-07-1974, Esterhuysen 33586 (BOLL NBG!); Sir Lowry’s
Pass, 1000 ft [300 m], (-BB), 11-07-1890, Guthrie 2001 (NBG!). 3419
40
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
(Caledon): Baviaansfontein, Gansbaai, 800 ft [250 m], (-CB), 14-03-
1977, Hugo 806 (NBG!, PRE); Kleinbos, Die Kelders, 50 ft [15 m],
(-DA), 4-11-1969, Taylor HC 7420 (NBG!. PRE); Bredasdorp Forest
Reserve, 60 ft [18 m], (-DC), 12-03-1979, Thompson MF 3974 (NBG!,
PRE). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Potberg. 500-600 ft [150-180 m], (-BC),
19- 06-1984, Oliver 8512 (NBG!). 3421 (Riversdale): Canca, (-BC),
20- 03-1975, Oliver 5739 (NBG!); Ystervarkpunt, 80 m, (-BD), 15-05-
1987, Willemse 185 (NBG!). 3422 (Mossel Bay): Mossel Bay, dunes,
(-AA), 08-1962, Liebenberg 6376 (BM!. NBG!, PRE).
1.1. E. melastoma Andrews , Coloured engravings
of heaths: t. 37 (1799). E. petiveri var. melastoma
(Andrews) Benth.: 622 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 47
(1905). E. follicularis Salisb. var. melastoma (Andrews)
Dulfer: 29 (1965). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 37 (1799).
Note: Dulfer overlooked the problem of the dates of publication of
Andrews' plates and selected Salisbury's name of 1802 for the species,
thereby relegating Andrews’ E. melastoma to varietal status. Dulfer
(1965) cited 1802 as the date of publication for E. melastoma which is
the date of the bound volume and not the date which is printed on the
plate. A paper detailing the publication dates of all Andrews' species is
in preparation (Cleevely & Oliver 2002).
Diagnostic features', leaves erect to semi-erect,
straight; flowers single on short, leafy side branches; sul-
cus on sepals, bract and bracteoles very short, apical,
broadly open, V-shaped (not narrow, slit-like and form-
ing a keel) or absent.
This is a very variable species in the size of the flow-
ers, size and shape of the sepals, shape and stickiness of
the corolla and colour of the corolla apex. Within all this
variation there is only one distinct discontinuity, namely
in the size of the corolla, and we propose to recognize
this at subspecific level.
1.1a. subsp. melastoma
E. vestiflua Salisb.: 346 (1802); Guthrie & Bolus: 48 (1905);
Dulfer: 30 (1965). Type: sine loc.. Roxburgh s.n. [Roxburgh 71 det.
Salisbury] (K!).
E. follicularis Salisb.: 348 (1802): Dulfer: 29 (1965). Iconotype:
Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 44 (1797).
E. petiveri var. willdenovii Bolus: 48 (1905). E. coccinea var.
willdenovii (Bolus) H. A. Baker: 184 (1967). Type: Thunberg s.n.
(UPS).
E. coccinea var. inflata H. A. Baker 75 (1958). E. follicularis var.
inflata (H. A. Baker) Dulfer: 30 (1965). Type: Caledon Div., Koude
Mountains, between Gaansbaai and Elim. Baker 1154 (BOL, holo.;
NBG!).
Illustration: Baker & Oliver: t. 1, 8 (1967).
Diagnostic features: corolla ± 18 mm long (Figure
1B4).
Within the subspecies there is a considerable amount
of variation in several characters, mainly the corolla
shape, colour and stickiness. Despite there being some
collections which appear to be very distinct, we are
unable to recognize any formal categories and thus list
them here as unnamed variants to show possible groups
that need to be worked on in detail in the field and
through DNA analyses.
VARIANT A: the corolla is yellow with a dark, almost
black, distal end. It may, however, be greenish yellow
with the distal end fading to brown soon after anthesis.
The typical variant, shown in Andrews’ painting, has
large sepals, i.e. broad and more than half the length of
the corolla tube, the corolla slightly to much inflated
towards the base and mostly not sticky although small
sessile glands may occur on the margins of the sepals
(Figure I B.fl. The leaves can be short to very long. The
distribution is from Stellenbosch to Bredasdorp.
VARIANT B: this variant has flowers similar to
Variant A, but they are very sticky and yellowish with a
black mouth (Figure 1B4). It includes the var. inflata and
occurs in the Bredasdorp District.
VARIANT C: with similar flowers to A, but not
sticky, usually light orange-yellow, mostly with no tuft-
ed small side branches typical of the other variants. It
occurs on limestone flats of the Bredasdorp District.
VARIANT D: flowers yellow-orange with no black
mouth, with long narrow tube and a short calyx less than
half the length of the corolla tube, which is not sticky
(Figure IB,). This occurs in the region from Tulbagh to
the Cederberg.
VARIANT E: flowers the same as those in D above,
but very sticky. The stickiness is produced by a remark-
able array of sessile glands in several zones around the
margins of the sepals (Figure 1 B2). This variant is found
in the Porterville Mountains, but a few collections near
Wemmershoek and Baviaansberg, Ceres, have a reduced
amount of glands.
Vouchers: Andreae 686 (NBG!); Guthrie 2005, 2498 (NBG!);
Hanekom 2941 (NBG!); Oliver 10676 (NBG!), STE30143 (BOL!,
NBG!. PRE).
1.1b. subsp. minor E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv. subsp.
nov., floribus minoribus, 6 ad 7 mm longis, distinguitur.
Figura 1B5.
TYPE.— Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Koueberge,
SE-facing slope above Remhoogte, ± 250 m, (-DA), 27
October 2001, R.C. Turner 401 (NBG, holo.; BM, BOL,
K, NY, PRE).
Diagnostic features : corolla 6-7 mm long, yellow
with dark mouth (Figure 1B5).
The subspecies occurs in the Hermanus and Bredas-
dorp Districts.
Paratype material: WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Herma-
nus Mtns, (-AD), 10-1924. Marloth 6225 (NBG!. PRE); Baard-
skeerdersbos, (-DA), 8-9-1957, Baker 1250 (NBG!): Remhoogte,
(-DA), 25 October 1967, Thomas in NBG86471 (NBG). 3420 (Swell-
endam): Bredasdorp Mtn, (-CA), 15-10-1951, Esterhuysen 19169
(BOL!. NBG!. PRE). Without locality: Caledon Wildflower Show. 09-
1965, Oliver STE32109 (NBG!).
1.2. E. intermedia Klotzsch ex Benth. in DC.
Prodromus 7: 621 (1839). E. petiveri var. intermedia
(Klotzsch ex Benth.) Bolus: 47 (1905). E. coccinea var.
intermedia (Klotzsch ex Benth.) Dulfer: 29 (1965).
Syntypes: Swellendam, Masson s.n. (K), Niven s.n.
(BOL!, K), Ecklon s.n. (Bt). Lectotype to be selected
from the material used by Bentham in K.
Diagnostic features: anther apices acuminate; corolla
distinctly longer than calyx, ±6-11 mm long.
1 ,2a. subsp. intermedia
Diagnostic features: flowers green to yellow-green,
8-11 mm long; corolla tubular-ovoid; bract, bracteoles
and sepals with small sessile glands and short hairs on
margins (Figure lDfl.
This occurs along the Langeberg and Outeniqua
Ranges from Swellendam to George.
Vouchers: Fourcade 5693 (NBG!, PRE), 4706 (BOL!, PRE);
McDonald 1274 (NBG!); Rourke 294 (NBG!); Taylor LE 3014
(NBG!).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
41
1.2b. subsp. albiflora E.G.H.OIiv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., floribus albis minoribus corolla 5. 5-6.0 mm
longa late ovoidea, glandibus in marginibus bracteae,
bracteoleae sepalorumque distinguitur. Figura 1D2.
TYPE. — Western Cape. 3322 (Oudtshoorn):
Ruitersberg, N slopes at W end, 3000 ft [910 m], (-CC),
11 March 1988. Oliver 9105 (NBG).
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 35. t. 1 (1992).
Diagnostic features : flowers white; corolla broadly
ovoid, 5. 5-6.0 mm long; bract, bracteoles and sepals
with only small sessile glands on margins and no hairs
admixed (Figure 1D2).
The subspecies occurs in the Robinson Pass/Ruiters-
berg to Jonkersberg area of the Outeniqua Mountains.
Paratype material : WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoorn):
Outeniqua Mtns, Ruytersbosch, (-CC), 19-09-1951, G. van Niekerk 79
(BOL!. NBG!); Robinson Pass, 1850 ft [560 m], (-CC), 2-04-1979,
Campbell 13342 (NBG!); ibid.. 30-06-1947, Compton 19595 (NBG!);
ibid., 2-05-1974, Goldblatt 1781 (MO, NBG!); Ruitersberg, 3000 ft
[914 m], (-CC), 11-03-1988, Oliver 9105 (NBG!); ibid., 765 m, 5-04-
1994, Oliver 10429 (NBG!); Jonkersberg, (-CC), 29-08-1978, W. Bond
1462 (NBG!); ibid., 790 m, 4-02-1986. Brusse 4794 (NBG!, PRE);
ibid., 09-1912, Rogers 4273 (NBG); ibid.. 2-06-1951, L.E. Taylor 3006
(NBG!, PRE); ibid.. Van Breda & Admiraal 2105 (NBG!, PRE); ibid.,
2600 ft [790 m], 6-02-1978, Williams 2433 (NBG!); Engelsberg, 1800
ft [549 m], (-CC), 23-10-1984, VI ok 858 (NBG!. PRE).
2. E. vestiflua Salisb. — see E. melastoma subsp.
melastoma (1.1a).
6. E. monadelphia Andrews , Coloured engravings
of heaths; t. 38 (1797); Benth.: 622 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 50 (1905); Duller: 32 (1965) cum auct. Willd.
Iconotype: Andrews: t. 38 (1797).
Note: Andrews published the name as ‘monodelphia’ in the proto-
logue (text and plate), but later changed it to 'monadelphia' in the index
which was published some five years later in 1802 when the complet-
ed volume was bound. He also used the spelling ‘Monadelphia’. This
latter spelling was taken up by all subsequent authors who did not
query the ‘-ia’ ending. There is no indication why Andrews used this
substantival epithet in apposition. This could be assumed to be
Linnaeus’ major Class name. Monadelphia (stamens united by their fil-
aments into one body) (Steam 1957: 31). The grammatically correct
adjectival epithet would be 'monodelpha’.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 6 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 37,
t. 1 (1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 3 (2000).
Diagnostic features: anthers with a distinct boundary
between thecae and filament, and a slight basal adaxial
‘nose’; corolla tube straight. ± 11 mm long, bright red
(Figure 1C).
This is a distinct species within the ‘ coccinea' com-
plex and not with E. banksii as its number would suggest.
There are two branching forms within the species — one
with numerous very short side branches as in E. coc-
cinea, the other without these. The species is a resprouter
after fires.
Vouchers: Baker 1886 (NBG!); Oliver 3360 (NBG!. PRE); Oliver
& Palser 78 (K!, NBG!, PRE): Salter 4278 (BM!, BOL!. K!, PRE);
Schlechter 9750 (BM!, BOL!, K!, PRE).
ERICA PLUKENETII COMPLEX
Three separate species used to be recognized in this
complex — E. plukenetii, E. linecita and E. breviflora.
3. E. lineata Benth. — see E. plukenetii subsp. lineata
(5d).
4. E. breviflora Dulfer — see E. plukenetii subsp. bre-
viflora (5e).
5. E. plukenetii L., Species plantarum, edn 1, 1:
356 (1753); Benth.: 622 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 50
(1905); Dulfer: 31 (1965). Lectotype: Plukenet, Alma-
gesti Mantissa botanici 45: t. 344, fig. 3 (1700) selected
here by Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty, in prep.
Note: the iconotype accurately reflects Plukenet's specimen. Herb.
Sloane 89: 11 (BM! photo.-NBG).
Diagnostic features: bract and bracteoles very
reduced, remote from calyx; anthers exserted. long atten-
uated with rounded apices; placenta covered entirely by
ovules abaxially; seeds reticulate.
The main variation in this species is in the length and
shape of the corolla and sepals, size and texture of the
leaves, and in its habit. The flowers are 7—1 6(— 28) mm
long with a tubular or inflated tubular corolla with far-
exserted stamens (Figure 2). Flowers change shape as
they mature, often being rather slender in bud and quite
inflated at maturity. The sepals range from 2-12 mm
long, lanceolate to ovate in shape with the sulcus as long
as the sepal. The plants are mostly reseeders, but can be
resprouters in some areas, and can vary from woody,
rounded shrubs 0.75 m tall near the coast, to tall delicate
erect shrubs in the Bredasdorp District. In the Karnies-
berg the multi-stemmed resprouters can be up to 3 m tall.
This species is often confused with species in the E.
coccinea complex. The position and size of the bract and
bracteoles is the most visible character to distinguish it
from that group.
5a. subsp. plukenetii
E. plukenetii var. densa Bartl.: 630 (1832); Dulfer: 31 (1965). Type:
Caledon und Hottentotsholland, Ecklon s.n. (?).
E. plukenetii var. brachysepala Bartl.: 631 (1832); Dulfer: 31
(1965). Type: Zwischen Strauchen am Fusse des Teufelsbergs [Table
Mtn] in zweiter Hbhe. Ecklon s.n. ( P! ).
E. plukenetii var. brevifolia Bolus: 50 (1905); Dulfer: 31 (1965).
Type: Piquetberg Div.; Piquetberg Range, Schlechter 5208 (BOL!).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 2 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 36.
t. 7, 8, 9 (1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 1 (2000).
Diagnostic features: sepals 2-8 mm long, short and
ovate to longer and lanceolate (Figure 2A, B).
There is considerable overlapping variation in the
length of the leaves and in the width and length of the
sepals. This subspecies also exhibits considerable range
in the size of its flowers.
Vouchers: Barker 10423 (MO!, NBG!); Maguire 1129 (NBG!.
NY!): Oliver 3764 (K!, NBG!, PRE), 4918 (NBG!, PRE); Oliver &
Palser 22 (K!, NBG!. PRE); Phillips 7587 (K!, NBG!, NY!, PRE);
Rycroft 1949 (NBG!. P!); Schlechter 5208 (BM!, BOL!, K!, NBG!).
5b. subsp. bredensis E.G.H.OIiv. & I.M.Oliv,
subsp. nov., sepalis latibus ± 5-6 x 3 mm foliis
7— 10(— 1 2) mm longis dignoscenda. Figura 2E.
42
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 2. — Erica plukenetii complex. A. B. subsp. plukenetii'. A, Oliver 5953, Kamiesberg; B. Rycroft 1949, Bainskloof. C. subsp. penicellata,
Oliver 4226, Stanford: D, subsp. lineata. Oliver 8749, Pearly Beach. Carruther’s Hill; E, subsp. bredensis. Marsh 1468, Cape Infanta. F.
G. subsp. breviflora: F. Taylor 1 1670, Cederberg; G, Rourke 653, Boboskloof. Scale bar: A-G, 4 mm.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3420 (Bredasdorp): De Hoop
Nature Reserve, 100 ft [30 m], (-AD), 28 July 1970,
Marsh 1468 (NBG).
Diagnostic features: sepals broad (elliptic to ovate), ±
5-6 x 3 mm, leathery; leaves 7— 1 0(— 1 2) mm long; corol-
la ± 15 mm long, white with a pink mouth, red or occa-
sionally yellowish (Figure 2E). Flowers look very much
like those of subsp. lineata , but leaves are broader and
shorter.
The taxon occurs on limestone hills and lateritic Bats
from Heuningrug south of Bredasdorp, eastwards as far
as Cape Infanta and also on the sandstone of Potberg.
There are numerous collections from this area.
Paratype material (selection from many specimens): WESTERN
CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Bredasdorp Dist., Heuningrug, 70 m, (-DB),
1-04-1995. Paterson-Jones 218 (NBG!); De Hoop area, (-AD), 8-04-
1957, Barker 8681 (NBG!); ibid., 200 m, 14-06-1979, Burgers 1865
(NBG!); ibid.. Hardevlakte, 10-03-1985, Fellingham 947 (NBG!):
Albcrtsdal, (-BC), 31-05-47, Barker 4553 (NBG!); Potberg,
Elandspad, 600 ft 1 182 ml, (-BC), 1-05-1985, Leiih 51 (NBG!, PRE);
Cape Infanta, 150 ft [45 nt], (-BD), 7-04-1984, Oliver 8428 (NBG!);
Die Poort, (-CA), 10-08-1949. Steyn 341 (NBG!); Moerasfontein. 50 ft
[15 m], (-CB), 15-03-1977, Thompson 3430 (NBG!, PRE).
5c. subsp. penicellata (Andrews) E.G.H.Oliv. &
I.M.Oliv. stat. et comb. nov.
E. penicillata Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths 2: t. 116
(1802). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 1 16 ( 1802).
E. revolvens Barth: 631 (1832). E. plukenetii var. bicarinata Bolus:
51 ( 1905); Dulfer: 31 ( 1965). Type: berge bei Gnadenthal, Ecklon s.n.
(?holo.; ?P). Note: the collection in P is this species, but not yet veri-
fied as this subspecies.
Diagnostic features: sepals up to 12 mm long, thick
and fleshy, with distinctive non-revolute thick margins
forming two longitudinal keels like a catamaran (Figure
2C), bases of these keels produced into small lobes
beyond point of attachment to pedicel. These features are
well displayed in Andrews' drawing. Bartling's descrip-
tion fits this taxon — ‘sepalis base productis solutis, mar-
gine revolutis’.
Vouchers: Oliver 4226 (NBG!); Schlechter 7743 ( BML BOLL KL PRE).
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
43
5d. subsp. lineata ( Benth.) E.G.H.OIiv. &
I.M.OIiv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. lineata Benth. in DC.. Prodromus 7: 622 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 48 (1905); Duller: 30 (1965). Type: in colonia Capensi [Cape
Colony], Mund s.n. (Kl).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 3 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 35,
t. 3,4 (1992).
Diagnostic features: leaves very long, narrow; sepals
(Figure 2D) broad and flat sepals like those in subsp. bre-
densis.
The subspecies occurs on sandy soils associated with
coastal limestone deposits from Gansbaai to Zoetanys-
berg.
Vouchers: Kerr STE30029 (BM!, Kl, NBG!. PRE); Oliver 3365
(NBG!. PRE): Schlechter 9711 (BM!, BOL!. Kl. PI. PRE. SAM!, W).
5e. subsp. breviflora (Dulfer) E.G.H.OIiv. &
I.M.OIiv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. breviflora Dulfer in Annalen des Natiirhistorischen Museums,
Wien 68: 30 (1965). Type: Tliunberg s.n. (UPS).
E. scariosa Thunb.: 350 (1823); Guthrie & Bolus: 49 (1905); non
P.J.Bergius (1767). Type: as for£. breviflora above.
E. penicillata Benth.: 622 (1839), non Andrews, Coloured engrav-
ings of heaths 2: t. 116 (1802) (see subsp. 5c).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 36, t. 5. 6 (1992).
Diagnostic features : corolla short, ovoid to almost
globose, mostly ± 7 mm but less than 12 mm, white,
occasionally pink: synflorescence typically very long
spike-like up to 250 mm long (Figure 2F, G).
There is an increase in flower size in some collections
from the Cederberg together with a reduction in the
length of the synflorescences. These can merge with
some short variants of subsp. plukenetii in the
Franschhoek Mountains. We have noted that populations
in the Porterville Mountains have flowers that are sweet-
ly scented. This coupled with the smaller flowers would
indicate that the subspecies is pollinated by insects as
opposed to the postulated bird-pollinated, longer flowers
of all the other subspecies. The plants are single-
stemmed reseeders.
Guthrie & Bolus (1905) noted under E. scariosa 'we
admit this species with doubt' and kept it as distinct ‘with
some reluctance’.
The subspecies occurs in the Cederberg to Porterville
and the southern Cold Bokkeveld area.
Vouchers: Bolus 5114 (BM!. BOL!. K!, PRE, SAM!); Drege 7694
(BM!. K!, NBG!, PRE, W); Oliver 4075 (NBG!. PRE); Rourke 653
(K!, NBG!): Schlechter 9084 (BM!, K!, NBG!. PRE).
6. E. monadelphia Andrews — this has been placed in
the E. coccinea group after E. intermedia ( 1.2).
7. E. banksii Andrews, Coloured engravings of
heaths 1: t. 5 (1797) as E. banksia: Willd.: 395 (1799);
Bauer: t. 29 (1803); Benth.: 624 (1839); Dulfer: 32
(1965); as banksia Guthrie & Bolus: 51 (1905). Icono-
type: Andrews: t. 5 (1797).
Note: as with several other epithets coined by Andrews, the ‘-ia’
ending was thought to reflect the use of a generic name used in appo-
sition, in this case Banksia (Australian Proteaceae), and should not be
corrected. However, there are some cases where a generic name did not
exist or was coined later than the publication of the species name.
These -ia endings are being replaced by the relevant genitive ending (-
i, -ii, -ae or -iae) for all Andrews’ names commemorating persons. The
date of the Bauer plate is actually 1 Jan. 1801 and not the date of the
first published fascicle in the bound publication, i.e. 1796, as used by
Dulfer to antedate Bauer’s name over that of Andrews. However, fas-
cicle 3 containing this plate only appeared in 1803 (Britten 1899).
Diagnostic features: anthers well exserted with fila-
ments held in a tight bundle, bilobed with basal attach-
ment and distinct basal ‘chin’; corolla lobes spreading to
reflexed; tube straight, white or greenish with lobes
green or purple; leaves slightly serrated with sharp, short
to long mucro and longish petiole; bract and bracteoles
large and approximate to calyx; sepals with terminal
sharp mucro. Inflorescences numerous, pendulous, con-
sisting of 3-nate flowers at ends of main branches.
7a. subsp. banksii
Diagnostic features : leaves short, ± 5-6 mm long;
corolla yellowish green; ovary hairy (Figure 3A).
The typical subspecies forms a small, compact,
woody shrublet growing on rock ledges and occurs in the
mountains around the Elgin Basin.
Vouchers: Esterhuysen 2695 (BOL!. NBG!. PRE): Schlechter 7572
(BOL!, K!, PRE).
7b. subsp. purpurea (Andrews) E.G.H.OIiv. &
I.M.OIiv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. banksia var. purpurea Andrews, The Heathery 3: t. 106 (1806);
Guthrie & Bolus: 51 (1905). E. banksia var. purpurea (Andrews)
Dulfer: 32 (1905). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 106 (1806). Note: Andrews’
painting in Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 151 is not dated, so the
volume date has to be used in this case, namely 1809.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 5 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 38,
t. 3,4(1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla white with purple lobes;
leaves short, ± 5-9 mm long; ovary glabrous.
This subspecies grows on the mountains from
Babylon’s Tower southeast to Quoin Point.
Vouchers: Oliver STE30033 (BOL!. K!, NBG!. PRE); Zeylier 3189
(BOL1. P!, W).
FIGURE 3. — Erica banksii. A, subsp. banksii, Esterhuysen 2695,
Rooskraalberg: Bi. B2, subsp. comptonii, holotype, Compton
6066, Hangklip. Scale bars: A, Bi, 4 mm; B?, 2 mm.
44
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
7c. subsp. comptonii ( Salter ) E.G.H.Oliv. &
I.M.Oliv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. comptonii Salter in Journal of South African Botany 2: 60
(1936): Dulfer: 32 (1965). Type: Caledon Div., among rocks, northeast
slope of Hangklip, 1400 ft [426 m], Jan, Compton 6066 (BOL!, K!,
NBG1).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 4 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 38,
t. 5, 6 (1992).
Diagnostic features : corolla greenish white; leaves
long, 1 2— 20(— 26) mm long; ovary glabrous (Figure 3B).
This subspecies is confined to the higher mountain
peaks from Kogelberg to Hangklip. In the Kogelberg
complex the subsp. banksii occurs at lower altitudes at
the northeastern end.
Subsp. comptonii differs from the other two sub-
species in the larger, more open habit (up to 500 mm tall)
in open ground between rocks and in the longer leaves
(up to 26 mm) with longer mucros on the leaves and
sepals (Figure 3Bi). The sepals can vary from about half
to the full length of the corolla tube.
The variation in this species occurs in the flower
colours, the habit, habitat, length of leaves and length of
the mucro on the leaves and sepals. Disjunctions occur
regionally, but warrant recognition only at subspecific
level.
Vouchers: Boucher 1332 (NBG!, PRE); Compton 6066 (BOL!, K!,
NBG!); Pillans 8183 (BOL!, K!).
8. E. primulina Bolus — see E. viridiflora subsp.
primulina (9b).
8.1. E. leucosiphon L. Bolus in Kew Bulletin 1933:
186 (1934); Dulfer: 32 (1965). Type: Cape Town Wild
Flower Show, BOL19253 (BOL!).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 39, t. 9, 10 (1992).
Diagnostic features: pedicel long, with dense plumose
hairs; calyx white; anther appendages broad; corolla
white.
This distinct species has no alliances with any other
long-tubed species, but has, rather, an alliance with sev-
eral species with much shorter flowers, such as E. mon-
soniana L.f. (no. 402) and E. goatcheriana L. Bolus (no.
405.1 ). The possession of plumose hairs on the pedicel
are shared by all of them.
Vouchers: Kellerman 157 (PRE); Kirsten 434 (NBG!); Oliver 4101
(NBG!).
9. E. viridiflora Andrews , The Heathery: t. 299
(1812); Guthrie & Bolus: 52 (1905); Dulfer 32 (1965).
Iconotype: Andrews: t. 299 (1812).
Note: Andrews’ much fuller painting in Coloured engravings of
heaths: t. 287, must have appeared after 1820, which date Andrews
mentioned in the text accompanying the plate, even though the volume
is dated ‘1809’.
Diagnostic features: corolla lobes large and erect;
anther appendages decurrent along filament, pendulous
to very reduced and ear-like.
9a. subsp. viridiflora
Illustrations: Baker* Oliver: t. 7 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 39,
t. 11, 12 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla lime-green, sticky, with a
patch of sessile, sticky glands in centre of upper half of
adaxial surface of sepals. Inflorescence consists of three
flowers; it is terminal on main and occasionally sec-
ondary branches; bract and bracteoles approximate to
calyx; anthers bilobed with thecae often divergent; ovary
ovoid and glabrous (Figure 4A).
The typical subspecies forms an erect shrub, 0. 5-1.0
m tall, growing in open ground or between rocks. It
occurs on the coastal mountains from George through to
Humansdorp.
Erica clavata Andrews (Coloured engravings of
heaths: t. 159, 1809) was included by Guthrie & Bolus
(1905) and Dulfer (1965) in synonymy. Careful exami-
nation of his painting leads to the conclusion that E.
clavata could be a hybrid with E. viridiflora as a possi-
ble parent. Characters which do not fit the current taxon
are the erect imbricate leaves, the broadly ovate sepals
with long attenuate apices, and the muticous anthers.
Vouchers: Oliver STE30030 (BM!, BOL!, K!, NBG!, PRE!);
Schlechter 5801 (BM!, BOL!, K, PRE, W).
9b. subsp. primulina (Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.
Oliv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. primulina Bolus in Flora capensis 4: 51 (1905); Dulfer: 32
(1965). Type: Ladismith Div., on rocky mountain slopes of the Klein
Zwartbergen, near Seven Weeks Poort, 3250 ft [990 m], Marloth 2937
(BOL!).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 39, t. 7, 8 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla cream to greenish, non-
sticky; shrubs small, woody shrublets, erect to 300 mm
FIGURE 4. — Erica viridiflora, with flower, sepal in adaxial view
showing zone of sessile glands, and anther. A, subsp. viridiflo-
ra, Visser 29, Ruitersberg; B, subsp. primulina. Oliver 10819,
Meiringspoort; C, subsp. redacta, Vlok s.n., Meiringspoort.
Scale bars: anthers, sepals, 2 mm; flowers, 4 mm.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
45
high but sometimes prostrate (Figure 4B).
Subsp. primulina occurs only in the Swartberg Range
from the Klein Swartberg to near Willowmore. A collec-
tion from Gamkaberg, which is further to the south and
west than the rest of the collections, is an intermediate
variant having the flowers of this subspecies, but the
growth of subsp. viridiflora — it is recorded as a woody
erect shrub 500 mm tall.
In the protologue. Bolus mentioned the affinity with
E. viridiflora , but surprisingly stressed a closer likeness
to E. banksii and gave the differences from that species.
Vouchers: Esterhuysen 6286 (BOL!, K!, NBG!. PRE); Oliver 3436
(NBG!).
9c. subsp. redacta E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp.
nov., a subspecie typica floribus multo minoribus differt.
Figura 4C.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3322 (Oudtshoorn):
Meiring's Poort, (-BC), 14-10-2001, Vlok & Schutte 458
(NBG, holo.; BM. K, NY, MO, PRE).
Diagnostic features : differs from subsp. primulina
only in size of flowers and their parts, corolla 4. 5-5.0
mm long (Figure 4C).
This small-flowered form is restricted to a single popu-
lation of some 100 plants occurring in crevices on a large
steep slab of quartzite rock. The plants were about 200
mm tall and bore creamy white to sometimes green-
tinged flowers. Subsp. primulina grows in similar habi-
tats in the vicinity.
This is clearly a case of a short-tubed variant adapted
to a different pollination syndrome (insect versus bird).
Paratype material. WESTERN CAPE. — 3322 (Oudtshoorn):
Meiring's Poort, (-BC). 01-2001. fruiting, Vlok s.n. (NBG).
10. E. sphenanthera Tausch, Flora: 17: 626 (1834);
Guthrie & Bolus: 52 (1905); Duller: 33 (1965). Type:
without locality or collector (PRG!, holo.; photo.
-NBG!).
This taxon is regarded as a hybrid of garden origin in
Europe. No material matching the description and the
type has been found in the Cape. Parentage could include
E. abietina because of the similar bracteoles, anthers and
ovary.
11. E. cerviciflora Salisb. in Transactions of the
Linnean Society 6: 362 (1802); Guthrie & Bolus: 53
(1905); Dulfer: 33 (1965). Type: Hottentots Holland, 1.
Mulder s.n. ( K ! ).
No material matching the description and type has
been found in the Cape. We postulate that this collection
is of hybrid origin in the wild. Parentage could include E.
abietina because of the similar anthers and ovary. Jacob
Mulder is known only through the citation by Salisbury
of 37 species of Erica from the Cape (Gunn & Codd
1981). Only one specimen is labelled as a Mulder col-
lection by Salisbury.
11.1. E. beatricis Compton in Journal of South
African Botany 9: 128 ( 1943); Dulfer: 33 (1965). Type:
Uniondale Dist., Helpmekaar (or Thumb) Peak, Bond
892 (NBG!).
Illustration: Compton, l.c„ t. 8 (1943).
Diagnostic features: anthers exserted, with short stub-
by appendages below thecae; ovary puberulous; corolla
glabrous; stems, leaves, pedicel, bract, bracteoles and
sepals all puberulous.
This species has been collected only once. There are
no indications of its alliances. There is a possibility that
it is a naturally occurring hybrid, as found in several
other supposedly rare species that have been investigat-
ed in the wild, e.g. E. x flavisepala (Oliver 1977) and E.
x vinacea (Oliver 1986).
Vouchers: Bond 892 (NBG!); Esterhuysen 5021 (BOL!).
The remaining 24 species with whole numbers dealt
with in this paper were placed by Guthrie & Bolus
(1905) in § Evanthe which was based on ‘Inflorescence
mostly axillary, more rarely also terminal on the same
plant. Corolla tubular, mostly over 6 lin. [12 mm] long,
rarely shorter.' The inflorescence is 1 -flowered on a very
short lateral branchlet often less than 1 mm long and
sometimes bearing very reduced scarious leaflets. These
occur in the axils of leaves on the main branch (hence
axillary) and are arranged in dense spike-like synflores-
cences towards the ends of the main branches which con-
tinue their vegetative growth. This contrasts with the
often 3-nate inflorescences on leafy lateral branchlets
found in §Pleurocallis which will be dealt with in Part 2.
The inclusion of species in this section, § Evanthe , has
been rather arbitrary, being based mainly on the size of
the corolla. Species with smaller flowers, but with the
same inflorescence structure, have been included in
§ Hermes , and one of these is certainly very closely relat-
ed to some species in this section, e.g. E. axilliflora
L. Bolus.
12. E. mammosa L., Mantissa plantarum altera:
234 ( 1771); Benth.: 624 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 53 ( 1905);
Dulfer: 33 (1965). Lectotype: Herb. Linn. 498.33 (LINN),
selected here by Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty in prep.
E. gilva J.C. Wendt.: 48 et fig. (1798); Benth.: 624 (1839); Guthrie
& Bolus: 54 (1905). Type: sine. coll, et loc. (?); iconotype: J.C. Wendt,
fig. (1978).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 9 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 40,
t. 1-3; 42, t. 5, 6 ( 1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 4 (2000).
Diagnostic features: corolla narrowed at base with 4
indentations or folds, glabrous; bract and bracteoles
small and remote from calyx; anthers with long thin
appendages and a basal, projecting ‘nose’; leaves erect
and green; ovary short, rounded and glabrous.
We agree with Salter’s reduction of E. gilva to syn-
onymy under E. mammosa, both having four broad to
narrow indentations at the base of the corolla. The former
occurs only on Table Mountain on the Cape Peninsula
and was separated by Guthrie & Bolus (1905) on the
longer bract, bracteoles and sepals — it has white flowers
sometimes with a green tip. There is a lot of variation in
the colour of the flowers on the Peninsula, particularly in
the southern parts and some plants in the Cape of Good
Hope Nature Reserve have very long spike-like synflor-
escences.
Erica mammosa is widespread from the Cape
Peninsula to the Cold Bokkeveld and eastwards to
Bredasdorp with flowers orange or deep purple-red,
greenish yellow to white. Variations occur in the length
of the spike- 1 ike synflorescence from short and dense to
46
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
very long (up to 250 mm) and rather open. The pedicel
can be glabrous or hairy and the sepals 3-6 mm long. On
the mainland the plants are resprouters, whereas on the
Peninsula they may be resprouters or single-stemmed
reseeders. The most variation occurs on the mountains
above Simonstown.
Vouchers: Bolus 3354 <BM!, BOL!, K!, P!, PRE, SAM!);
Schlechter 10115 (BM!, K!. P!. PRE. W).
13. E. broadleyana Andrews, Coloured engravings of
heaths: t. 154 (1809). Type: Andrews: t. 154 (1809).
This is regarded as a hybrid of garden origin in
England. The plant looks like E. plukenetii, but has
included anthers. Andrews’ drawing shows the upper part
of the filaments zig-zagged, which condition would indi-
cate that the anthers could become exserted from the
very narrow mouth.
14. E. baueri Andrews , The Heathery: t. 252 (1812)
as bauera ; Dulfer: 33 (1965). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 252
(1812).
Note: Andrews’ epithet is corrected to the genitive case instead of the
generic name, Bauera , used in apposition (see note under E. banksii no. 7).
E. bowieana Lodd.: t. 842 (1824): Benth.: 624 (1839): Guthrie &
Bolus: 54 (1905). Iconotype: Lodd.: t. 842.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 10 (1967): Schumann & Kirsten:
40, t. 4(1992).
Diagnostic features', corolla base inflated and rounded
with no indentations, white or shell pink; anthers with
basal nose and long thin appendages; leaves usually
greyish and recurved; long curved pedicel, small bract
and bracteoles remote from calyx; ovary short, rounded,
glabrous.
14a. subsp. baueri
Diagnostic features', leaves short, spreading to
recurved; flowers usually 1 0-20 in few short dense sub-
terminal spike-like syn florescences, white to pale pink.
This commonly cultivated and well-known sub-
species is now becoming rare in its habitat due to the
spread of agriculture and alien vegetation (mainly Acacia
cyclops) in the sandy flats which are derived from quart-
zitic sandstone and lie west of Albertinia.
Vouchers: Kerr STE30084 ( BOL!, K!, NBG!. PRE); Oliver 174 sub
Baker 1589 { BM!, NBG!).
14b. subsp. gouriquae E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., a subspecie typica foliis erectis floribus plus
numerosis plus sparsis differt. Figura 5.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3421 (Riversdale): Alber-
tinia, Rein’s Coastal Nature Reserve, main valley just N
of Trig. Beacon 64, 150 m, (-BC), E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver
11933 (NBG, holo.; BM, BOL, E, K, MO, NY, P, PRE, S).
Diagnostic features: leaves erect; Bowers 5-10 in
loose, spike-like syn florescences, more numerous and
scattered over shrub, pale to deep pink (Figure 5).
This subspecies forms a taller, denser shrub up to 2.5
m. It grows very localized in sandy areas associated with
limestone between the hills to the south of Albertinia
near the coast, an area called Gouriqua.
Paratype material: WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale):
Buffelshoek. N of Ystervarkpunt. 140 m, (-BC), 13-09-1983, Burgers
3152 (NBG!); Ystervarkpunt/Gouriqua, 130 m. (-BC), 9-07-1987,
Willemse 624 (NBG!); ibid.. 200 nr, 27-10-1986. T.J. van cler Merwe
146 ( NBG!).
15. E. giiva J.C.Wendl., see under E. mammosa (12).
16. E. sessiliflora L.f, Supplementum plantarum:
222 (1782); Benth.: 625 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 55
(1905). Type: Cap. bonae spei, sine coll. (UPS).
E. clavaeflora Salisb.: 365 (1802). E. sessiliflora var. clavaeflora
(Salisb.) Bolus: 55 ( 1905); Dulfer: 34 ( 1965). Type: comm. Hibbert s.n. (K!).
E. sceptriformis Salisb.: 365 (1802). E. sessiliflora var. sceptri-
formis (Salisb.) Bolus: 55 (1905); Dulfer: 34 (1965). Type: sine loc.
Roxburgh s.n. (K!).
E. sessiliflora var. oblanceolata Bolus: 55 (1905); Dulfer: 34
(1965). Type: sine loc., Guthrie 3795 (BOL).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 8 ( 1967); Schumann & Kirsten: 42.
t. 7-9 ( 1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 5 (2000).
Diagnostic features: pedicel very short; bract, bracte-
oles and sepals equally long and becoming enlarged,
Beshy and persistent in fruiting stage; corolla pale green
to yellowish green; sepals spathulate with entire to ser-
rated margins; anther appendages narrow; ovary short,
rounded and glabrous.
This is a very distinctive species being the only one in
the genus exhibiting serotiny — the fruiting synflores-
cences remain on the plants for several seasons as cone-
like structures with the fruits protected by the thickened
calyces. The species is very variable in the size of the
corolla and in the shape of the sepals from narrowly
oblanceolate to very broadly spathulate — characters used
to separate several varieties by previous authors. There
is, however, no clear-cut disjunction between these
shapes that warrant recognition. A very showy variant
occurs on the Riviersonderend Mountains with green
corolla and bright red sepals compared to the normal
green sepals.
Vouchers: Burchell 5354 (NBG!, NY!. W); Compton 14230 ( NBG);
Oliver 8995. 11236 (NBG): Parker 3798 (BOL!, NBG!); Schlechter
7583 (BM!, K!, NBG!, PRE. W).
17. E. filipendula Benth. in DC., Prodromus 7:
663 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 56 (1905); Dulfer: 34
(1965). Type: Cape Colony, Bowie s.n. (K!).
Diagnostic features: corolla cyathiform or slightly
closed at mouth, 5-10 mm long; sepals narrow lanceo-
late, about 73-72 length of corolla; anther appendages
narrow with very few lateral teeth, anther nose long,
erect to absent.
17a. subsp. filipendula
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 13 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
43, t. 12, 13 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla cyathiform, 8-10 mm
long, yellow or dark pink; anthers situated in middle of
corolla. Figure 6B.
The typical subspecies occurs on sandy hills between
Viljoenshof and Pearly Beach in the Bredasdorp District.
Both colour forms have been noted growing sympatrically.
Vouchers: Baker 1775 (BM!, NBG!); Bolus 8450 (BM!. BOL!,
PRE); Guthrie 3786 (BOL!, NBG!); Oliver 3414 (NBG!. PRE), 8748
(NBG!).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
47
FIGURE 5. — Erica baueri subsp. gouriquae , Willemse 624. A, flowering branch, x 1; B, stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, flower; E, anther,
side, front and back views; F, gynoecium; G. ovary, opened laterally; H, capsule; 1, seed; J, testa cells. Scale bars: B, C, E, F-H, 2 mm; I,
1 mm; D, 4 mm.
17b. subsp. parva E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp.
nov., subspeciei typicae similis sed floribus albis ad pal-
lide roseis corolla 5-7 mm longa antheris in corolla
altioribus differt. Figurae 6C; 7.
TYPE. — Western Cape. 3419DB (Caledon): Bredas-
dorp Dist.. Soetanysberg area, west end just east of Melk-
pan, 40 m. 12 May 1999, E.G.H. & l.M. Oliver 11254
(NBG. holo.: BM. K. MO, NY, PRE).
E. filipendula var. minor Bolus: 56 (1905) p.p. Syntypes:
Bredasdorp Div., between Elim and Ratel River, 200-300 ft [60—90 m],
Guthrie 3784 (BM!. BOL!, SAM!); ibid.. Bolus 8451 (BM!, BOL!);
sine loc.. Zeyher 1090 (K!. BOL! fragm.).
Diagnostic features: corolla white to pale pink, urceo-
late-cyathiform. 5-7 mm long; anthers positioned higher
up in corolla than in typical subspecies. Figures 6C; 7.
The type population had flowers varying from white to
pink on the same plant and grew with low plants of the
green-flowered form of E. penduliflora (17.2). The subspecies
occurs on sandy flats and hills between Elim and Zoetanys-
berg. There are numerous collections from this region.
Paratype material: WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Bredasdorp): Ratel
River. 150 ft [45 m], (-DA), 16-07-1895, Guthrie 3784 (BM!, BOL!
fragm., SAM!); Uintjieskuil, near Ratel River, (-DA), Van Breda 2149
(NBG!); Soetanysberg, W end above Suur-en-Soet, 350 ft [106 m],
(-DB), 29-03-1971, Oliver 3357 (NBG!, PRE); Rietfontein. near
homestead, 45 m, (-DB), Pater son- Jones 234 (NBG!); Rietfontein.
(-DB), 14-05-1993, Schumann 843 (NBG!); 1 mile [1.6 km] N of
Soetanysberg. 300 ft [90 m], (-DB), 2-06-1967, Williams 1005 (NBG!,
PRE). Without precise locality: near Elim and Ratel River, 300 ft [90
in], (-DA), 07-1895. Bolus 8451 (BM!, BOL!).
This species forms a complex with the next two
species, which were all treated as one species by Guthrie
& Bolus ( 1905). It varies in a number of characters — size
and colour of flowers, form of anther appendages, anther
shape and position in the flower (Figure 5). Bolus’ var.
major was removed as a distinct species, E. penduliflora
(17.2) and Dulfer (1965) described var. minor Bolus as E.
globulifera. The remaining medium to small-flowered
forms constitute this species.
17.1. E. globulifera Dulfer in Annalen des
Natirrhistorischen Museums, Wien 68: 35 (1965). E. fili-
pendula Benth. var. minor Bolus: 56 (1905) p.p. Type:
Bredasdorp Div., between Elim and Ratel River,
200-300 ft [90 m], Schlechter 10472 (BM!, BOL!, P!.
PRE, SAM!, W).
48
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 6. — Relationship of floral
parts in A, Erica penduliflo-
ra: B, E. filipendula subsp.
filipendula ; C, E. filipendula
subsp. parva ; D, E. globulif-
era. Left, flower cut open
longitudinally to show posi-
tion of anthers; centre, sepal;
right, stamen in side view
showing variations in basal
nose. Scale bars: flower, 4
mm; sepal, stamen, 2 mm.
Diagnostic features : sepals ovate, V5-V4 as long as
corolla; anther appendages broadly based and much
toothed; corolla purplish pink, 3-5 mm long.
The larger-flowered collections southwest of Bredas-
dorp have very reduced anther noses, whereas the collec-
tions from the De Hoop area have smaller flowers and
remarkable turned-up noses, a character not found in any
other species (Figure 6D).
Dulfer only examined the single collection,
Schlechter 10472 (W), when he raised E. filipendula var.
minor to specific status and selected that as the lectotype,
unaware that the other three syntypes constituted anoth-
er distinct taxon (see 17b).
Vouchers: Schlechter 10472 (BM!, BOL!, P!, SAM!, W).
17.2. E. penduliflora E.G.H.Oliv. in E.G.H.Oliv.
& I.M.Oliv. in Yearbook of the Heather Society 2001: 31
(2001 ). Type: Western Cape, 3419DA, Bredasdorp Dist.,
hills NW of Viljoenshof, 120 m, 12 May 1999, white-
flowered, E.G.H. & I. M. Oliver 11245 (NBG, holo.; BM,
BOL, K, MO, NY, P. PRE, S).
E. filipendula var. major Bolus: 56 (1905). Types: Syntypes:
Bredasdorp Div., fairly abundant on downs between Elirn and Ratel
River, 300-600 ft [90-180 m], Guthrie 3786 (BOL!, NBG!); ibid..
Bolus 8452 (BM!, BOL. NBG!, PRE); ibid., Schlechter 7618 (BM!,
BOL!. NBG!, P!. PRE. W), Schlechter 7726 (BM!, BOL!, P!.W); ibid.,
MacOwan [Schlechter] in Herb. Aust. Aft: 1920 (BM!, BOL!, P!,
SAM!).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 13 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
43, t. II (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla 12-18 mm long; sepals
broadly ovate; anthers with projecting nose and long thin
appendages; ovary glabrous with long stipe. Figure 6A.
'Iliis was regarded as a large-flowered variety of E. fili-
pendula by Bolus (1905), but was deemed sufficiently
distinct to be recognized as a distinct species based on
the above characters. The species has two distinct colour
variants, white or yellowish green, which are allopatric.
In the Pearly Beach area a white variant has recently
been recorded with green tips.
Vouchers: Oliver 11245 (BM!. BOL1. K!, MO!, NBG!, NY!, P!,
PRE!, S ! ), 11246 (BM!, K!. NBG!. NY!, PRE!); Schlechter 7618 (BM!.
BOL!, NBG!. P!, PRE. W).
18. E. grandiflora L.f. — see E. abietina subsp. auran-
tiaca (23e).
19. E. exsurgens Andrews — see E. abietina subsp.
aurantiaca. (23e).
20. E. longisepala Guthrie & Bolus: 57 (1905);
Dulfer: 35 (1965). This is just a large-flowered form of
E. parilis Salisb. (Guthrie & Bolus 1905: sp. no. 301).
21 . E. hibbertii Andrews , Coloured engravings of
heaths: t. 172 ( 1805) as hibbertia ; Guthrie & Bolus: 58
( 1905); Dulfer: 36 (1965). Type: Andrews: t. 172 (1805).
Note: see note under E. hanksii (7) for the need to change Andrews’
personal epithets.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 18 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
44, t. 16, 17 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla smooth (lacking any lon-
gitudinal ridges), sticky; bract and bracteoles nearly as
long as sepals and approximate to them; inflorescences
umbel-like.
The inflorescence is umbel-like on the main stems and
can have, in addition, below the umbel, short leafy
branchlets ending with a 3- or 4-nate inflorescence. This
latter situation is shown in Andrews’ painting.
The main axis can sometimes continue growth.
Vouchers: Bolus 5168 (BOL!. PRE); Oliver STE30035 (BM!. K!.
NBG!, PRE!). 11952 (K, NBG, NY, PRE); Salter 4952 (BOL!, K!,
SAM!).
21.1 E. tenax L. Bolus — see E. thomae (2 1 .2).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
49
FIGURE 7. — Erica filipendida subsp. parva , type, Oliver 11254. A, flowering branch, x 1; B, stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, vestigial lat-
eral branch in axil of vegetative leaf, showing vestigial leaves at base and flower with corolla removed; E, flower; F, anther, side, back and
front views. Scale bars: B-G, 2 mm.
21.2. E. thomae L. Bolus in Annals of the Bolus
Herbarium 4: 17, t. 1A (1925); Duller: 36 (1965). Syn-
types: Cape Province, South-Western Region; Caledon
Div., fl. Jan., Rooi Els near Hangklip, T.P. Stokoe in
BOL17571 (BOL! K!); Palmiet River Valley, Stokoe in
BOL17572 (BOL!). Lectotype selected here: Stokoe in
BOL17571 (BOL).
E. thomae L. Bolus var. brevisepata L. Bolus: 18 (1925). Type: Cape
Town Wildflower Show, sine coll. BOL16233 (BOL!).
E. tenax L. Bolus: 17. t. IB ( 1925): Dulfer: 36 (1965). Type: Cale-
don Div., Palmiet River Valley, fl. Jan., T.P.Stokoe in BOL17623
(BOL!, K!).
E. porteri Compton: 125. t.7 (1953): Dulfer: 36 (1965). Syntypes:
Caledon Dist.. Buffels Kloof, near Pringle Bay, 500 ft. alt.. 25 March
1953, [specimen figured]. Porter s.n. (NBG!); ibid., 25 March 1953.
Porter s.n. (NBG!); ibid., 17 August 1953. Porter s.n. (NBG!).
Illustrations: L. Bolus: t. 1 A (1925); Schumann & Kirsten: 44, t. 18;
45, t. 19-21 (1992).
Diagnostic features', corolla sticky, with longitudinal
ridges, densely to sparsely covered with hair-like
spicules or pustules; flowers in a dense spike-like syn-
florescence, with 1 -flowered florescences on vestigial
lateral branchlets bearing small scarious leaves; bract
and bracteoles small, tough and situated in middle of
pedicel; anthers included with ear-like appendages below
thecae; filaments with spicule-like hairs; ovary rounded
and glabrous.
We retain the epithet thomae in recognition of
Thomas Stokoe’s considerable collections of fynbos
plants made from the 1920s to the early 1950s — both L.
Bolus’ species were described on the same page.
The species shows much variation in the size, thick-
ness and degree of spreading of the leaves, the length of
pedicels (from 4-16 mm long), and the colour and size of
the Bowers. There are no clear-cut discontinuities to war-
rant formal taxonomic rank and the three species have
been grouped here as variants of a single species. All
occur in the mountains from Kogelberg to Hangklip to
Kleinmond. Some detailed molecular studies may help to
elucidate the relationships between the variants.
VARIANT A (formerly E. thomae sensu stricto ):
medium-long pedicels, 6-10 mm long; corolla 22-30 mm
50
Bothalia 32, 1 (2002)
long, rose pink to dark reddish pink with or without paler
tips. It occurs in the southwestern parts of the distribution
range.
VARIANT B (formerly E. tenax ): long pedicels,
13-16 mm long; corolla 22-30 mm long, green to white.
This is the variant from the northern and eastern parts of
the distribution range.
VARIANT C (formerly E. porteri ): short pedicels, 4-7
mm long; corolla 20-25 mm long, more delicate and dark
reddish pink with white mouth; leaves more spreading up
to 90°. This is restricted to a single small population in
the Buffelsrivier Valley near Pringle Bay where it grows
with Variant A and appears to produce hybrids. However,
some collections of Variant A from other areas possess
similar small flowers, but not the bicoloured corolla. The
Buffelsrivier population has plants more delicate than the
other two variants.
Vouchers: Oliver 92 (NBG!, PRE!); Porter s.n. (K!, NBG!). sub
PRE28592 (K!. PRE); Stokoe 8347 (BOL!. NBG!. PRE).
21.3. E. porteri Compton — see E. thomae (21.2).
22. E. phylicifolia Salisb. — see E. abietina subsp.
atro rosea (23b).
22.1. E. nevillei L.Bolus in Annals of the Bolus
Herbarium 3: 172, t. 7B (1923); Dulfer: 37 (1965). Type:
Cape Province: South-Western Region: Cape Peninsula,
southwestern slopes of Noord Hoek Mountain, fl.
Jan-Feb., N.S. Pillans 4124 (BOL!, Kl, NBG!).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 46., t. 24 (1992); Oliver &
Oliver: t. 12 (2000).
Diagnostic features: corolla tube with basal restriction
zone; inflorescence spike-like and/or umbel-like and with
no continuing apical growth; ovary emarginate, glabrous.
With the bipartite anthers and emarginate turbinate
ovary, this species clearly belongs in the E. abietina
group. It is a restricted endemic on the Cape Peninsula.
Vouchers: Baker 612 (BM!, NBG!, PRE!); Galpin 12531 (K!. P!.
PRE); Pillans 4124 (BOL!. K!, NBG!).
22.2. E. quadrisulcata L.Bolus in Annals of the
Bolus Herbarium 3: 1 72, t. 7D (1923); Dulfer: 37 (1965).
Type: Cape Province: South-Western Region: Cape
Peninsula, neck between Signal Mountain and Zwartkop,
Klaver Valley, near Simonstown, 11. Jan., Pillans 3944
(BOL!, NBG!).
Illustrations: L.Bolus: t. 7D (1923); Schumann & Kirsten: 46, t. 25
(1992); Oliver & Oliver: t. 14 (2000).
Diagnostic features: ovary acute, glabrous; inflores-
cence umbel-like, not continuing with vegetative elonga-
tion.
The species is a very restricted endemic on the Cape
Peninsula.
Vouchers: Baker 852 (BM!. NBG!); Galpin 12798 (K!. PRE);
Pillans 3944 (BOL!, NBG!).
23. E. abietina L., Species plantarum edn 1,1: 355
(1753); Salter: 634 (1951); Dulfer: 37 (1965). Type: this
will be dealt with in a paper on Linnaean typification
(Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty, in prep.).
Diagnostic features: ovary emarginate, obovoid, cov-
ered with dense, short, retrorse hairs (Figure 8).
The considerable range of variation and lack of clear
disjunctions have resulted in the reduction of several
well-known species to subspecific rank and with two new
taxa warranting only subspecific rank.
23a. subsp. abietina
E. coccinea sensu P.J.Bergius: 92 (1767), non L. (1753); Benth.:
627 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 59 ( 1905). Type: without locality or col-
lector (SBT).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 46, t. 26 (1992); Oliver &
Oliver: t. 9 (2000).
Diagnostic features: corolla dark red, tubular, 18-26
mm long, spiculed to sparsely puberulous and slightly
viscid; sepals subovate, sparsely pilose with adaxial ses-
sile glands; anthers included to exserted (Figure 8B).
The subspecies is confined to the upper rocky slopes
and plateau of Table Mountain.
Vouchers: Bolus 3366 (BM!. BOL!. K!. PRE), sub Herb. Norm. 189
(BM!. BOL!. P!); Oliver 110 (NBG!).
23b. subsp. atrorosea E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., corolla rosea ad atrorosea, tubulosa, 18-22
mm longa, ± glabra aliquantum viscida. sepalis late
lanceolatis, sparse puberulis glandibus adaxialibus,
antheris inclusis interdum manifestis. Figura 8C.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3418 (Simonstown): Froggy
Pond, (-AB), 14 June 1949, Barker 5355 (NBG).
E. purpurea Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 50 ( 1795);
Benth.: 627 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 58 (1905). Iconotype: Andrews:
t. 50(1795).
E. phylicifolia Salisb.: 364 (1802); Salter: 636 (1951); Dulfer: 36
(1965). Type: Sponte nascentem in Hottentots Holland, 1. Mulder s.n.
( K ! ) . Note: the type has a finely puberulous calyx.
E. hesseana J.C.Wendl. ex Klotzsch: 634 (1835): Guthrie & Bolus:
61 (1905): Dulfer: 38 (1965). Type: Prom. b. sp.. Hesse s.n. (MEL!).
Note: there are two specimens in MEL — one the original from
Wendland’s herbarium determined by Klotzsch. the other a branch bro-
ken off by Klotzsch and retained in B and seen by Bentham. Both were
borrowed by Sonder who was working on the genus for his Flora
capensis when he died, and were never returned to the original herbaria.
His herbarium was sold in two parts with the Ericaceae going to Baron
Ferdinand von Mueller in MEL.
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 45, t. 23 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla rose to deep rose, tubular,
1 8-22 mm long, ± glabrous and somewhat sticky; sepals
broadly lanceolate, sparsely puberulous with adaxial ses-
sile glands; anthers included, occasionally manifest
(Figure 8C).
The taxon is confined to the Cape Peninsula and
occurs from the lower slopes of Table Mountain at
Kirstenbosch along the mountains southwards to Cape
Point. It is not sympatric with subsp. abietina.
Paratype material (selection from numerous collections): WEST-
ERN CAPE — 3318 (Cape Town): Kirstenbosch, 150 ft [45 m], (-CD).
27-08-1997. McGrath s.n. (NBG!). 3418 (Simonstown): Muizenberg.
1400 ft (426 m], (-AD). 02-1878. Bolus 4475 (BM!. BOL!. K!. PRE!);
Muizenberg/Kalk Bay Mtns, 300 ft [90 m], (-AD), 03-1880, Bolus
4516 (BM!. BOL!, K!, NBG!); St James, 900 ft [274 m], (-AD). 12-02-
1959, Oliver 50 (NBG!); Kalk Bay Mtn, 800 ft [243 m], (-AD), 12-02-
1959. Oliver 54 (NBG!); Swartkop, Klaver Valley, 1100 ft [335 m|,
(-AD), 14-02-1985. Oliver 8675 (NBG!); Vasco da Gama Peak, (-CB ),
12-12-1959. Oliver 353 (NBG!); Cape Point, (-CB). 10-02-1929, J.B.
Gillett 3465 (NBG!); ibid., 06-1967, Williams 1008 (NBG!).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
51
FIGURE 8. — Erica abietina com-
plex. A, subsp. aurantiaca ,
Van Wyk 481. Rocklands,
Cold Bokkeveld; B. subsp.
abietina. Taylor 5777, Table
Mtn. Platteklip; C. subsp.
atrorosea, Oliver 8675, Sim-
onstown: D. subsp. constan-
tiana, Oliver 11335. Constan-
tiaberg; E. subsp. diabolis.
Kirsten 422, Devil’s Peak
Saddle. Scale bars: anthers,
sepals, 2 mm: flowers, 4 mm.
23c. subsp. diabolis E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.OIiv.,
subsp. nov., corolla breviter obconica, rosea, 11-14 mm
longa, subglabra, sepalis ovatis pilosis glandibus ses-
silibus adaxialibus dignoscenda. Figura 8E.
TYPE. — Western "Cape. 3318 (Cape Town): saddle
between Devil's Peak and Table Mountain, 2100 ft [640
m], (-CD). 25 August 1973. Kirsten 422 (NBG).
E. coccinea L. var. echiiflora sensu Bolus: 60 (1905) non E. eclii-
iflora Andrews. E. abietina var. echiiflora (Bolus) Salter: 643 (1951);
Dulfer: 37 (1965).
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 46. t. 27 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla shortly obconical, rose-
pink, 11-14 mm long, subglabrous, subviscid; sepals
ovate, pilose with adaxial sessile glands (Figure 8E).
The subspecies is a very restricted endemic occurring
only on the saddle between Devil’s Peak and Table
Mountain.
Andrews’ E. echiiflora is placed under E. viscaria
subsp. gallorum (34d). His paintings show a ridged
corolla with nipped-in mouth and spreading corolla lobes
and an ovary with longish erect hairs — all typical of that
species.
Vouchers: Bolus 3772 (BM1. BOL!, K!); Kirsten 422 (NBG!).
23d. subsp. constantiana E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.OIiv .,
subsp. nov., floribus obconicis, roseis, sepalis sparse
puberulis vel glabris, antheris inclusis dignoscenda.
Figura 8D.
TYPE. — Western Cape. 3418 (Simonstown):
Constantiaberg, middle N slopes, 620 m. (-AB), 21-09-
1999, E.G.H. & I. M. Oliver 11335 (NBG).
E. cotiica Lodd.: t. 1179 (1824); Benth.: 664 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 60 (1905); Salter: 649 (1951); Dulfer: 37 (1965). Iconotype:
Lodd.: t. 1179 (1824).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 47, t. 28, 29 (1992); Oliver &
Oliver: t. 10 (2000).
Diagnostic features: corolla pale to deeper rose-pink.
obconic, 8-11 mm long, glabrous, subviscid; sepals
lanceolate-ovate, with adaxial sessile glands; anthers
always included, situated about 2/3 way up tube (Figure 8D).
This subspecies is confined to the Cape Peninsula
occurring on the mountains from Constantia Neck to
Chapman’s Peak.
Guthrie & Bolus (1905) noted that there is little to
separate E. conica from subsp diabolis (quoted by them
as E. abietina var. echiiflora). We retain it as a subspecie's
in this complex.
Paratype material (selection from numerous collections): 3318
(Cape Town): Kasteelspoort, 1200 ft [365 m], 08-1877. Bolus 3715
(BOL!, K! ); no precise locality, mtns near Cape Town, 1894, Bolus
7949 (BOL!, NBG!, PRE). 3418 (Simonstown): Constantiaberg, 2000
ft [609 m], (-AB), 22-05-1941, Compton 10842 (NBG!); ibid.. 2900 ft
[883 m], 5-06-1985. Oliver 8742 (NBG!); ibid., 29-08-1963. Stauffer
5063 (K!, NBG!. PRE); Orangekloof, (-AB), 28-08-1954. Esterliuysen
23085 (BOL!); Chapman’s Peak/Noordhoek. 900-1000 ft [2744304
m], (-AB), 1-08-1972, Kirsten 304 (NBG!); Karbonkelberg, (-AB),
16-08-1972. Oliver s.n. (NBG!); Vlakkenberg, (-AB). 13-09-1936.
Salter 6283 (BOL!. K!); Noordhoek Peak, (-AB), 1400 ft [426 m], 20-
07-1967. Taylor 6395 (NBG!. PRE).
23e. subsp. aurantiaca E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.OIiv.,
subsp. nov., corolla ( 1 0— )25— 30[— 34] mm longa, glabra,
viscida vel non viscida, sepalis longe acuminata ex base
ovata, antheris inclusis ad perexertis. Figura 8A.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Fransch
Hoek Pass, mtn slopes NE of top of pass, 2500 ft [760
mj, (-CC), February 1966. Chafer in STE30037 (NBG,
holo.; BM. BOL, K, PRE).
E. grandiflora L.f.: 223 (1782); Benth.: 628 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 57 (1905). Type: Caput bonae spei. Thunberg s.n. (UPS).
E. exsurgens Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 22 (1796);
Benth.: 627 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 57 (1905): Dulfer: 35 (1965); E.
grandiflora var. exsurgens E.G.H.Oliv.: 204 (1967). Iconotype:
Andrews: t. 22 (1796). Note: Andrews' paintings bearing the above
names all seem to be of the Franschhoek/Wemmershoek form with
longer leaves and pale to dark orange flowers, but not pure yellow.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 14 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
44, t. 14 (1992).
52
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
Diagnostic features', corolla tubular, ( 1 0— )25— 30[— 34]
mm long, glabrous, sometimes with few hairs on lobes,
orange to orange-red, sticky to non-sticky; sepals long
acuminate from ovate base, with large area of adaxial ses-
sile glands; anthers included to far exserted (Figure 8A).
This is the most widespread, common and variable of
the subspecies, occurring from the hills just northeast
and east of Cape Town to as far inland as the Witteberg
at Matjiesfontein and southeast to near Ashton, but
absent from the Cape Peninsula. The flowers can be pale
to dark orange with zones of yellow below, to complete-
ly deep orange-red.
Paratype material (selection from numerous specimens): WEST-
ERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Klein Dassenberg, Kanonkop,
(-DA), 3-05-1986, Fellingham 1077 (NBG!); Kuils River hills, 600 ft
[182 nr], (-DC), 19-06-1972, Oliver 3767a (K!. NBG!. PRE). 3319
(Worcester): Agter Witsenberg, (-AB), 10-03-1959, Barker 8875
(MO!. NBG!): MichelTs Pass, 1 400 m, (-AD), 01-1892, Guthrie 2285
(NBG!): ibid., 1200 ft [365 m], 15-01-1896, Schlechter 9958 (BOL!,
K!, NBG!. PRE!. W); Ceres, Waboomsberg, 1 320 m, (-AD). 12-11-
1989, Oliver 9272 (NBG!); Bokkerivier, (-BD), 9-11-1963,
Middlemost 2241 (NBG!. NY!); Du Toit's Kloof, foot Paarl side,
(-CA), 15-10-1949. Barker 6076 (NBG!, P!): Paarl, Donkerkloof,
(-CC), 12-09-1948, Esterliuysen 14560 (BOL!. NBG!); French Hoek.
(-CC), 1894. Fair sub Bolus 6321 (BOL!. NBG!, PRE); Fransch Hoek
Pass, 920 m. (-CC), 8-01-1970, Oliver & Palser 12 (NBG!. PRE).
3320 (Montagu): Touwsrivier. Pienaarspoort, 1 000 m. (-AA), 5-05-
1994, Oliver 10464 (NBG!): Remhoogte SE of Ashton, 425 m, (-CC),
21-03-1986. Oliver 8814 (NBG!).
23f. subsp. perfoliosa E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., foliis longioribus 20-30(-42) mm, corolla
flava dense puberula non viscida dignoscenda. Figura 9.
TYPE. — Western Cape. 3318 (Cape Town):
Stellenbosch, Jonkershoek Twins, SW slopes, 600 m,
(-DD), 24 May 2001, E.G.H. & I.M.Oliver 11912 (NBG,
holo.; BM, BOL. K, MO. NY, P, PRE, S).
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 44, t. 15 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla pure yellow, 20-25 mm
long, densely, finely hairy, non-sticky; sepals broadly
elliptic and long acuminate, with adaxial non-sticky ses-
sile glands; anthers included to manifest; leaves
20— 30( — 42 ) mm long (Figure 9).
The material of this taxon was at one stage classified
as E. exsurgens Andrews. The taxon does not match any
of Andrews’ plates and is a distinct, very localized entity
occurring only in the Jonkershoek Valley near Stellen-
bosch where it is occasional to locally common on the
moister granitic slopes facing south and southwest.
Paratype material : WESTERN CAPE — 3318 (Cape Town): all
from Stellenbosch. Jonkershoek Valley, (-DD), 29-03-1943,
Esterhuysen 8789 (BOL!); 3-04-1949, Esterliuysen 15230 (BOL!); 25-
01-1975, Esterhuysen 33758 (BOL!, K!); 19-05-1950, Parker 4477
(BOL!, K!, NBG!); 2300 ft [700 m], 14-06-1962. Taylor 3399 (BM!.
NBG!. PRE); 3000 ft [914 m], 30-01-1963, Taylor 4628 (NBG!, PRE);
13-04-1961, Van Rensburg 465 (NBG!, PRE).
FIGURE 9. — Erica abietina subsp. perfoliosa, type Oliver 11912. A, flowering branch, x 1 ; B, leaf; C, flower; D, flower cut in half with sepals
removed; E, bract; F, bracteole; G, sepal; FI, sepal, adaxial surface showing sessile glands; 1, anther, side, back and front views; J, anther
variant, side and front views; K, gynoecium seed; M, testa cell. Scale bars: B, E-K. 2 mm; C, D, 4 mm; L, 1 mm; M, 50 pm.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
53
23g. subsp. petraea E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. nov., corolla flava dense puberula non viscida,
sepalis sine glandibus sessilibus adaxialibus, habitu
petrensis dignoscenda. Figura 10.
TYPE. — Western Cape. 3319 (Worcester): Porterville
area, Groot Winterhoek Mtns, Kliphuisvlakte, road to
Groot Kliphuis, rock crevices in rocky outcrop. 1 140 m,
(-AA), 23 November 1999, E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver 11440
(NBG. holo.; K, PRE).
Diagnostic features: corolla pure yellow, ± 20 mm
long, densely, finely hairy, non-sticky; sepals narrow-
lanceolate with no adaxial sessile glands; anthers mani-
fest to exserted (Figure 10).
The subspecies is restricted to rocky outcrops on the
mountains above Porterville where the common and
widespread subsp. aurantiaca is not known to occur.
Paratype material: WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wupperthal): Groot
Winterhoek Wilderness area, mtns above and ENE of Porterville, 3200
ft [975 m], (-CC), 23-11-1999, E.G.H. & I.M. Oliver 11449 (BMI, NBG!).
Erica abietina is highly variable in flower size and
colour, indumentum of calyx and corolla, stickiness of
the corolla, degree of inclusion/exsertion of the stamens,
anther shape, and leaf length and habitat preferences. It
used to consist of four separate species that were long
established in the literature — E. abietina. E. phylicifolia,
E. grandiflora and E. conica. There are no clear disjunc-
tions in the ranges of characters that were formerly used
to separate them, but there are some slight discontinuities
which warrant only subspecific recognition.
The whole complex is held together by flowers borne
1 -nate or occasionally 2-nate on vestigial lateral branch-
lets arranged in compact, spike-like synflorescences
towards the ends of main branches. The leaves are all
apiculate and vary from 10-30(^4-2) mm long, the se-
pals vary from very narrow, long-lanceolate to lanceo-
late, to broadly lanceolate, to almost ovate and long-
acuminate and have a flattened, raised area below the
sulcus. They may be villous to pilose or glabrous and
often bear numerous sessile glands over their inner sur-
face, thus rendering the corolla viscid. The sepals all
have sessile glands on the margins and, except for subsp.
petraea , numerous sessile glands adaxially in the middle
zone next to the margins (Figure 9H) — these may be
sticky or non-sticky.
The corolla is mostly long-tubular varying from 18 to
30(-34) mm in length, but in two subspecies, obconical
and only 8-14 mm long. It varies from glabrous to sub-
glabrous to densely and finely hairy and may be red,
orange-red, orange, deep pink, pink or yellow. In the
fresh state these colours are very distinctive, and would
clearly lead one to use them as specific characters, but in
dried material without colour notes, identification is nigh
impossible and one has to resort to a few morphological
characters. The anthers can be distinctly bipartite, even
splitting in the apex of the filament, to having the thecae
closely adpressed — sometimes varying in a single col-
lection. They are mostly attached basally to slightly sub-
basally. The filaments are often sparsely strigulose with
the style sparsely hairy.
The Peninsula taxa tend to form a group having the
apex of the corolla lobes a little more rounded, whereas
the taxa from the mainland have more acute apices to the
corolla lobes.
FIGURE 10. — Erica abietina subsp. petraea, type Oliver 11440. A, flowering branch, x 1; B. stem with leaves removed; C, leaf; D, flower; E,
bract; F, bracteole; G, sepal; H, anther, back, side and front views; I, ovary; J, 1/s ovary. Scale bars: B, C, E-J, 2 mm; D, 4 mm.
54
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
24. E. conica Lodd. — see E. abietina subsp. constan-
tiana (23d).
25. E. pinea Thunb., Dissertatio botanica de Erica :
23 (1785); Guthrie & Bolus: 60 (1905); Duller: 38
(1965). Type: sine loc., Thunberg s.n. (UPS; BM!, K!).
E. aurea Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 76 (1803);
Benth.: 628 (1839). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 76 (1803).
E. argentiflora Andrews, The Heathery: t. 202 (1809). E. pinea var.
argentiflora (Andrews) Bolus: 61 (1905); Dulfer: 38 (1965). Iconotype:
Andrews: t. 202 (1809).
E. aurea Andrews var. viscosissima Benth.: 628 (1839). E. pinea
var. viscosissima (Benth.) Bolus: 61 (1905); Dulfer: 38 (1965). Type:
Fransche Hoek Kloof, Masson s.n. (K!).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 47. t. 30. 31 (1992).
Diagnostic features', corolla glabrous, smooth, dry;
sepals with no glands on adaxial surface; ovary globose,
substipitate, glabrous, 6-8-locular.
This species is characterized by the 6-8-locular ovary
which is stipitate and glabrous, the glabrous dry smooth
corolla and no glands on the adaxial surface of sepals.
The flowers may be yellow with a white tip or pure
white. It can easily be mistaken for white-flowered forms
of E. viscaria subsp. longifolia.
Vouchers: Esterhuysen 1769 . 19987 (BOL!, NBG!. PRE); Oliver
1136 (NBG); Schlechter 10254 (BM1, K!, NBG!, PRE); Thompson
3834 (K!, NBG!, PRE).
26. E. hesseana J.C.Wendl. ex Klotzsch — see E. abi-
etina subsp. atrorosea (23b).
27. E. annectens Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capen-
sis 4: 61 (1905); Salter: 637 (1951); Dulfer: 38 (1965).
Type: Cape Div., mountains near Kalk Bay, Guthrie 1002
(BOL!, PRE).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 16 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
48, t. 32, 33 (1992).
Diagnostic features : flowers 4-nate, terminal on
branches; corolla glabrous, smooth, non sticky; anthers
dorsally attached; ovary globose, glabrous, 8-locular.
This is a rare, highly restricted endemic on the Cape
Peninsula. It is related to E. pinea and E. verticillata (64),
which also have 8-locular ovaries.
Vouchers: Oliver STE30036 (BM!, BOL!, K!, NBG!, PRE!).
28. E. regia Bartl. in Linnaea 7: 630 (1832);
Benth.: 626 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 62 (1905); Dulfer:
38 (1965). Type: Zoutcndaelsvalley im Distr. Caledon
[Zoetendalsvlei near Agulhas], Miss Joubert s.n.
(GOET?).
Diagnostic features', corolla glabrous and smooth, tex-
ture stiff and cartilaginous; anthers with vestigial
appendages on apex of filaments; ovary hairy at top with
erect hairs.
With only a slight disjunction in one morphological
character coupled with a clear difference in habitat pref-
erences, we are reducing this complex of three species
and three varieties to one species with two subspecies.
28a. subsp. regia
E. regia var. variegata Bolus in Flora capensis 4: 62 (1905); Dulfer:
38 (1965). Syntypes: Bredasdorp Div., hills near Elim, 300—400 ft
[90-120 m], Pappe 60 (?); ibid.. Bolus 6754 (BM!. BOL!. K!, PRE);
ibid.. Guthrie 2362 (BOL!); ibid.. Will sub MacOwan in Herb. Austr.-
Afr. 1718 (BM!, BOL. K!.P!).
E. regia var. williana Bolus: 62 (1905): Dulfer: 38 (1965).
Syntypes: Bredasdorp Div., hills near Elim. 300—400 ft [90-120 m],
Guthrie 3788 (NBG!); ibid.. Bolus 8448 (BM!, BOL!); ibid., Schlechter
7680 (BM!. BOL!. PRE); ibid. Will sub MacOwan Herb. Austr. Apr.
1719 (BM!. BOL!, K!, P!, SAM!). Lectotype selected here: Will sub
MacOwan Herb. Norm. Austr. Afr. 1719 (BOL!).
E. casta Guthrie & Bolus: 62 (1905); Dulfer: 38 (1965). Syntypes:
Bredasdorp Div., maritime downs and hills near Elim, about 300 ft [90
m], Guthrie 3719 (7): ibid. Bolus 6752 (BM!. BOL!). 6762 (BOL!. K!)
& 8446 (BM!. BOL!, K!). Note: Bolus 6762 = E. vestita (31).
E. casta var. breviflora Guthrie & Bolus: 63 (1905); Dulfer: 38
(1965). Syntypes: Bredasdorp Div., hills near Elim, 300 ft [90 m],
Guthrie 3790 (BOL. SAM!): ibid. Bolus 8449 (BOL!. K!). 8460 (BOL!
K!). Note: Guthrie’s 3790 in SAM = E. axilliflora also Bolus 8449 in
BM. Bolus determined his 8449 in BOL as E. axilliflora and cites it as
such in Flora capensis. He noted on the label of 8460 that it grew with
his 8446 and 8449. Guthrie 3789 is E. axilliflora and cited as such in
Flora capensis.
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 11 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
48, t. 34-37 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla nipped in at apex just
below spreading lobes.
Guthrie & Bolus (1905) noted under E. casta — ^close-
ly allied to E. regia we propose the species with some
doubt’. We concur with them.
The variant with variegated flowers (basal white zone,
middle mauve/purple zone and bright red upper zone) is
very striking and well known as the Elim Heath, but has no
morphological differences from the unicoloured forms, some
of which can have a slightly paler whitish basal portion.
The var. williana described by Bolus is a problem in
that it was considered by us as a short-tubed form (flow-
ers 6-12 mm long versus 14-20 mm in the typical sub-
species) with a postulated different pollination syndrome
and worthy of subspecific status. However, we have
recorded it as a few plants growing together with the
orange-red long-tubed typical subspecies and the dark
pink E. axilliflora Bartl. just northwest of Zoetanysberg
(see Note above under synonymy). The flowers varied
from pale to darker purple. At the time we concluded that
the plants were possible hybrids between the two species.
Further ‘populations’ of this form need to be located and
investigated thoroughly before any definite conclusions
can be made as to its identity.
Vouchers: Bolus 8448 (BM!. BOL!. K!, PRE); Oliver 3371 (K!.
NBG!. PRE), 3415 (K!, NBG!. PRE!). STE30138 (K!. NBG! NY!, PRE!).
28b. subsp. mariae (Guthrie & Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv.
& I.M.Oliv ., stat. et comb. nov.
E. mariae Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capensis 4: 63 (1905); Dulfer:
39 ( 1965). Type: Riversdale Div., at Milkwood Fontein, 600 ft [180 m],
Galpin 3565 (BOL!, K!, PRE).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 50, t. 38—40 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla not nipped in at apex.
This subspecies occurs only on limestone ridges from
southwest of Bredasdorp to Stilbaai. In the Mierkraal
area this taxon grows on the limestone ridge, whereas the
variegated variant of subsp. regia grows on the nearby
lateritic/sandy flats.
Guthrie & Bolus separated the species in this variable
complex on the colour and shape of the corolla and the
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
55
degree of protrusion of the nose at the base of the
anthers.
The protologue for the species described the type with
‘flores purpurei’. We have not seen a purple-flowered
long-tubed plant in the wild, but have seen fresh material
of the purple-flowered short-tubed form (var. willicina ).
The Elim hills and Zoetanysberg possess a form with
bright orange-red flowers and further south towards the
sea the white-flowered (sometimes tinged pinkish) form,
formerly E. casta , occurs, both on sandy substrates. On
the lateritic flats southeast and east of Elim the form with
variegated flowers occurs. On the limestone ridges from
Mierkraal right through to Stilbaai, there occur plants
with dark red flowers. The colours are very distinctive
and recognizable, but have no major taxonomic signifi-
cance to warrant subspecific ranking. Herbarium materi-
al in which colour has not been recorded cannot be iden-
tified with any certainty.
The corolla shape in E. regia and E. casta is almost
identical, both having a restriction below the spreading
corolla lobes and sometimes a tapering towards the base.
The flowers of E. marine do not have the distinct restric-
tion. There is no clear-cut boundary between the more
extreme anther noses in some material of E. regia to the
almost lack of a nose in E. casta and E. mariae.
Vouchers: Compton 23202 (NBG!. W): Oliver 5788 (NBG!. PRE):
Taylor 8951 (K!. NBG!, PRE).
29. E. casta Guthrie & Bolus — see E. regia subsp.
regia (28a).
30. E. mariae Guthrie & Bolus — see E. regia subsp.
mariae (28b).
31. E. vestita Thunb., Dissertatio botanica de
Erica : 22 (1785); Benth.: 626 (1839): Guthrie & Bolus:
63 (1905): Dulfer: 39 (1965). Type: sine loc., Thunberg
s.n. (UPS. K!, fragm.).
E. vestita var. coccinea Curtis: t. 402 (1798). E. longifolia Bauer
var. amplicata Bolus: 66 (1905); Dulfer: 40 (1965). Type: Curtis: t. 402
(1798).
E. vestita var. fnlgida Andrews: t. 137 (1804); Bolus: 64 (1905);
Dulfer: 39 (1965). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 137 (1804).
E. longifolia Bauer var. maritime Bolus: 66 (1905); Dulfer: 40
(1965). Type: Bredasdorp Div., hills near Cape Agulhas, Schlechter
10556 (BML BOLL PRE!, W).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 12 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
50, t. 41,42 (1992).
Diagnostic features: long leaves with long petiole (i.e.
versatile leaves); corolla trumpet-shaped, 16-24 mm
long, finely hairy, not ridged: ovary hairy on top. hairs
erect.
The variation in this species occurs in the shape of the
sepals from narrow-lanceolate to those with a broader
base, the corolla indumentum from very finely downy to
pilose and flower colour — white, pink, purple to red. The
northern groups of populations have distinctly geographi-
cal colours — white at Ezeljacht hills, red on the
Riviersonderend Mountains and purplish pink on the
Langeberg near Swellendam. They all have finely downy
corollas, whereas the southern populations from the
Klein River Mountains to Cape Agulhas have more
pilose corollas. The population north of Stanford has
white flowers, whereas there is a mixture of purple-
pink to reddish in the colour of the flowers from the hills
east of Stanford to Agulhas. The type is described as
white-flowered and would probably match the Ezeljacht
material.
Under E. longifolia Bolus commented on the close
similarity between his var. maritima and E. vestita. We
find it inseparable from the various forms of E. vestita
found in the Bredasdoip District and transfer it as a syno-
nym under this species — the smooth corolla (without
ridges) being sparsely pilose and the long petioles mak-
ing the leaves versatile, are the defining characters.
Vouchers: Burchell 7949 <KL PL PRE); Oliver 7536. 8982. 10970
(NBG!); Schlechter 7634 (BM!, KL PL PRE. W).
32. E. nematophvlla Guthrie & Bolus in Flora
capensis 4: 64 (1905); Dulfer: 39 (1965). Syntypes: Ri-
versdale Div., 1000 ft [300 m]; slopes of the Langeberg
Range near Riversdale, Schlechter 1728 (BM!, BOL!,
K!. P!. Z); roadside, Garcia’s Pass, Galpin 3643 (BOL!,
K!. PRE). Lectotype selected here: Galpin 3643 (BOL).
E. filamentosa Andrews var. longiflora Bolus: 65 (1905); Dulfer: 40
(1965). Syntypes: Swellendam Div., mountain ridges along lower part
of River Zondereinde. Zeyher 3171 (BOL!. KL PL PRE, W); Caledon
Div., without collector's name or number. Cape Govt. Herb. (?).
Illustrations: Schumann & Kirsten: 51, t. 43, 44 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla tubular, 10-12 mm long,
narrowed slightly towards apex, finely hairy to sub-
glabrous, white or pink.
The long-flowered variety of E. filamentosa has the
closed corolla mouth of this species, and even though the
corolla is pink, it is transferred to this species. There is a
clear disjunction in the distribution range with the pink
variant on the eastern Riviersonderend Range and the
white variant on the Langeberg at Grootvadersbos and
Garcia’s Pass.
Vouchers: Kirsten 677 (BOL!, KL NBG!); Oliver 8633 (NBG!);
Schlechter 1728 (BM!. BOL!, KL PL Z); Zeyher 3171 (BOL!. KL PL
PRE, W).
33. E. filamentosa Andrews , Coloured engravings
of heaths: t. 91 (1804); Benth.: 664 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 65 (1905); Dulfer: 39 (1965). Iconotype: l.c., t. 91
(1804).
Note: Dulfer incorrectly dated Andrews' plates of this species —
Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 91 is dated Feb. 1804 on the full
painting, with the reduced version. The Heathery: t. 22, dated Feb. 1805
on the plate.
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 51, t. 45 ( 1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla broadly obconic, 8-9 mm
long, sparsely and very finely hairy, pink.
The species is confined to the gravelly flats southeast
of Swellendam in the Bontebok National Park. It clearly
has a different pollinator from the pink-flowered form of
E. nematophylla as the anthers are situated lower down
in the very open-mouthed corolla.
E. filamentosa var. longiflora Bolus is transferred to
E. nematophylla (32).
Vouchers: Kirsten 744 (BM!, NBG!); MacOwan 1494 (KL NBG!,
PRE, W).
56
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
34. E. viscaria L., Dissertatio botanica de Erica : 10
(1770); Andrews: t. 71 (1800); Benth.: 664 (1839); Guth-
rie & Bolus: 210 (1905); Salter: 649 (1950); Dulfer: 102
(1965). Lectotype: Herb. Linn. no. 498.74 , lectotype
selected here by Oliver, Jarvis & Cafferty, in prep.
Diagnostic features', corolla longitudinally ridged with
very short bristle-like hairs or pustules; tube slightly con-
stricted below spreading lobes, not or rarely obconical to
broadly so; ovary obconical, not stipitate, covered with
erect dense fairly long, white hairs (Figure 1 1 ).
This is a very variable species which occurs from the
Cape Peninsula to Franschhoek and to the Bredasdorp
coastal flats. It is probably the most variable species of
Erica with respect to flower colour — white, green, yellow-
ish, pink, purple, red, or combinations of pink with a white
mouth or red with a yellow mouth. Some of these colour
variants are very striking and showy. The corolla varies in
shape and size over a wide range. The indumentum may be
almost absent, finely puberulous, strigose, spiculate,
strigose from pustules, or markedly pustulate. The flowers
may be very viscid, partially so or non-viscid and the plants
may be reseeders or resprouters with long to short leaves.
Colour is an unsuitable character since this is not
retained by older herbarium material and can therefore
not be used as a sole distinguishing feature.
Corolla length we regard as important in distinguish-
ing subspecies, since the open corolla shape of these taxa
coupled with a lower position of the stamens in their
flowers would suggest a different pollination syndrome
from the bird-pollinated long-flowered variants.
34a. subsp. viscaria
E. decora Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 162 (1807);
Benth.: 664 (1839); Salter: 649 (1950); Baker & Oliver: 119 (1967). E.
viscaria L. var. decora (Andrews) Bolus: 211 (1905); Dulfer: 103
(1965). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 162 (1807).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 114 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
169, t. 19 (1992).
Diagnostic features: inflorescence mostly lax; corolla
short (5-9 mm long), urceolate to campanulate-obconic,
soft and more transparent with slightly softer and shorter
hairs; anthers often adhering laterally; thecae with more
prominent basal bulges towards filament (Figure 1 1G).
Bolus (1905) noted the slight difference between
subsp. viscaria and subsp. gallorum by describing E. vis-
caria var. hispida from the Sir Lowry’s Pass area (see
below under 34d). The inflorescence is mostly laxer and
longer and the corolla soft and more transparent in the
typical subspecies.
This subspecies occurs on the Cape Peninsula moun-
tains and also the surrounding flats from where it is now
mostly extinct except in the northern parts. Two variants
occur — the commoner one with narrower, hairy sepals on
the mountains and the rarer with broader, subglabrous
sepals, as represented by the lectotype selected above,
mostly on the flats.
Vouchers: Baker 1228, (BM!, NBG!), 1773 (NBG!. PRE); Bolus
4610 (BOLL K!, NBG!, PRE); Oliver 8683 (NBG!); Steyn 88 (BOL!,
NBG!); Taylor 6404 (NBG!).
34b. subsp. longifolia (Bauer) E.G.H.Oliv. &
I.M.Oliv., comb, et stat. nov.
E. longifolia Bauer, Delineations of exotick plants cultivated in the
royal garden at Kew: t. 4 (1796); Benth.: 625 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus:
65 (1905); Dulfer: 40 (1965). Iconotype: Bauer: t. 4 (1796). Note: the
plate was dated 1 Jan 1793 by the artist/engraver, but published in the
fascicle, part 1, dated April 1796 (see Britten 1899).
E. pinea J.C.Wendl.: l.t. II (1798), non Thunb. (1785). E. longifo-
lia var. contracta Bolus: 66 (1905); Dulfer: 40 (1965). Type:
J.C.Wendl.: t. 11 (1798).
E. longifolia var. squarrosa Bolus: 66 (1905); Dulfer: 41 (1965).
Syntypes: sine loc.. Bolus 8039 (BOL!) & Schlechter 4789 (BM!,
BOL!, NBG!. W).
E. longifolia var. stricta Dulfer: 41 (1965). Type: Caledon Distr.:
Palmiet Rivier, Schlechter 7326 (BM!. BOL!, W).
Illustrations: Baker & Oliver: t. 15 (1967); Schumann & Kirsten:
52, t. 47 (1992).
Diagnostic features: corolla ± 12-20 mm long, tubu-
lar, non-viscid, hairy or pustulate, red, pink, purple,
white, yellowish or green or, in some cases, bicoloured —
pink with a white mouth or red with a yellow mouth;
sepals, bract and bracteoles long, linear-lanceolate
(Figure 1 1 A, B).
This is the most variable subspecies, which it may, on
more detailed population studies coupled with molecular
analyses, be possible to divide into more subspecific
taxa. All plants appear to be single-stemmed reseeders.
There are problems in distinguishing material of the
pink/purple-flowered form in the Bredasdorp District
from similarly coloured forms of E. vestita. It is very pos-
sible that the two species hybridize where they are sym-
patric. The flowers of E. viscaria subsp. longifolia have a
longitudinally ridged corolla and do not possess the
longer, soft hairs of E. vestita.
E. longifolia var. maritima Bolus has been transferred
to E. vestita (31).
Vouchers: Burchell 8039 ( K!, NBG!, P!, W); Oliver 4175 (BM!. K!,
NBG!, PRE!), STE30038 (BOL!. K!. NBG!, PRE!); Schlechter 4789
(BM!. BOL!, NBG!. W); Zeyher 3172 (BOL!, NBG!, P!, PRE, W).
34c. subsp. macrosepala E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv .,
stat. et nom. nov.
E. glutinosa Andrews, Coloured engravings of heaths: t. 25 (1798),
non P.J.Bergius (1767). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 25 ( 1798).
E. onosmiflora Salisb.: 363 (1802); Benth.: 626 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 66 ( 1905); Dulfer: 41 (1965). Type: as for E. glutinosa Andrews.
E. viridis Andrews: t. 140 (1805). E. longifolia var. viridis
(Andrews) Bolus: 66 (1905); Dulfer: 41 (1965). Type: Andrews: t. 140
(1805).
Diagnostic features: sepals lanceolate to ovate-lan-
ceolate, often with a broader base and attentuated apex,
corolla ± 15-20 mm long, tubular (Figure 1 ID).
The corolla is yellowish to green, occasionally white
and the plants are mostly resprouters. Some variants may
have very viscid flowers. The subspecies occurs in the
region from Betty’s Bay to Elim.
Vouchers: Compton 6135. 6149 (NBG!); Esterhuysen 4949 (BOL!,
NBG!); Hugo 1541 (NBG!, PRE); /. Kruger 1026 (NBG!); Oliver 3351.
4202 , 7423. 8700 (NBG!).
34d. subsp. gallorum (L.Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. &
I.M.Oliv ., stat. et comb. nov.
E. gallorum L.Bolus in Annals of Bolus Herbarium 1: 155, t. 1 1A
(1918); Dulfer: 41 (1965). Type: Cape Province: South-Western
Region, French Hoek, fl. Oct., Anon, in BOL14029 (BOL!, K!, PRE).
E. echiiflora Andrews: t. 164 (1805). Iconotype: Andrews: t. 164
(1805).
E. echiiflora Andrews var. purpurea Andrews: t. 260 (71812).
Iconotype: Andrews: t. 260 (1812).
E. viscaria L. var. hispida Bolus: 211 (1906). Syntypes:
Stellenbosch Dist., mountains near Sir Lowry's Pass, 900 ft [274 m],
Bolus 5548 (BOL, K!, NBG!, SAM!); ibid., Guthrie 3524 (BOL).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
57
Illustrations: L. Bolus, t. 11A (1918); Schumann & Kirsten: 52, t. 49
(1992).
Diagnostic features', corolla short 5— 10(— 1 2) mm
long, elongate-campanulate to obconic with pink lower
half and white mouth or sometimes pinkish throughout;
hairs short and stout (Figure 1 IF).
The subspecies is confined to the Nuweberg Reserve,
Elgin, on the eastern and southeastern side of the
Hottentots-Holland Mountains where the red-flowered
form of subsp. longifolia occurs at higher altitudes.
Andrews’ E. echiiflora is included as a synonym
based on the ridged corolla with spreading to reflexed
lobes and the ovary with erect, fine hairs, which are all
characteristic of E. viscaria and not of E. abietina.
Vouchers: Anon, in BOL14029 (BOL!. K!, PRE); Kirsten 546
(NBG!); Stokoe 7851 (BOL!, NBG!. PRE).
FIGURE 11. — Erica viscaria complex with flowers, sepal in adaxial view showing zones of sessile glands, anther and ovary. A, B, subsp. longifo-
lia: A, Oliver 11473, Steenbras; B, Gillett 999. Hermanus. C, subsp. pendula, Oliver 7610. Highlands; D. subsp. macrosepala. Porter s.n.,
Hangklip; E, subsp. pustulata, Williams 1552, Hermanus; F, subsp. gallorum, Kirsten 546, Nuweberg; G, subsp. viscaria, Oliver 8683,
Simonstown. Scale bars: anthers, ovaries, sepals, 2 mm; flowers. 4 mm.
58
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
34e. subsp. pustulata (H. A. Baker) E.G.H.OIiv. &
I.M.Oliv., stat. et comb. nov.
E. pustulata H. A. Baker in Journal of South African Botany 39: 207
(1973). Type: Cape, 3419 (Caledon): above the dams on Mossel River
at Hermanus, (-AC), at about 609 m, 11-10-1971, Williams 1552
(BOL!, holo.: NBG!).
E. patersonii L. Bolus: 134 (1928). non E. patersonia Andrews. E.
longifolia var. breviflora Dulfer: 40 (1965). Type: Caledon Div.,
Hermanus, fl. Sept. 1926, Paterson in BOL18548 (BOL!).
Diagnostic features: corolla markedly pustulate, yel-
low, ± 7 mm long, ovoid-urceolate (Figure HE).
Subsp. pustulata is closely related to the long-tubed
form of subsp. longifolia with yellowish to green flowers
from the same locality.
Vouchers: Paterson in BOL18548 (BOL!, K!); Williams 1552
(BOL!, NBG!).
34f. subsp. pendula E.G.H.OIiv. & I.M.Oliv .,
subsp. nov., floribus pendulis albis non viscidis tubo
corollae sub ore constricto ± 12-18 mm longo dignos-
cenda. Figura 1 1C.
TYPE. — Western Cape: 3419 (Caledon): Paardeberg,
south of Highlands Forest Reserve, (-BC), 550 ft [150
m], 26 February 1980, Oliver 7610 (NBG).
Illustration: Schumann & Kirsten: 52, t. 50 (1992) sub E. onosmi-
flora.
Diagnostic features: flowers pendulous (not spreading
to semi-erect); corolla ± 12-18 mm long, tubular, white,
sometimes tinged pink, non-sticky, with short hairs only
along longitudinal ridges and around base; plants sparse-
ly branched and up to 1.5 m tall, with relatively short
grey-green leaves (Figure 11C).
This subspecies is confined to the eastern end of the
Paardeberg Range west of Bot River Village.
A few collections from the region of Shaw’s Mountain
(e.g. Oliver 8022) have semi-pendulous flowers with the
corolla red and a yellow mouth, but sticky and strigose.
These could possibly be included under this subspecies,
but further investigations need to be done to assess their
identity within this highly variable species.
Paratype material : WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon):
Arieskraal, (-AA), 17-11-1944, Compton 9021 (NBG!); ibid., 255 ft
[78m], 13-02-1993, Rhode & Boucher 22 (NBG!); Paardeberg
/Highlands, 800 ft [240 m], (-AC), 25-02-1970, Boucher 1151 (K!,
NBG!); ibid., 1000 ft, 22-03-1971, F.J. Kruger 1176 (NBG!); ibid., 550
ft [167 m], 12-01-1970, Oliver & Falser 67. 69 (NBG!); ibid., 150 m,
3-1985, Schumann 307 (NBG!); ibid., 3-1949, Stokoe s.n. (SAM!);
Houtech, SW of Houhoek, 1700 ft [578 m], (-AC), 17-09-1987, Oliver
9021 (NBG!); Shaw’s Mtn, above Langhuis, 300 m, (-AD), 2-08-1983,
Oliver 8022 (NBG!). Without precise locality (3418BB/3419AA):
Palmiet/Grabouw, 800 ft [240 m], 20-07-1895, Guthrie 4971 (NBG!);
ibid., foothills, 10-1948, Stokoe s.n. (SAM!); road from Sir Lowry’s
Pass to Houwhoek, 6-04-1892, Guthrie 2294 (NBG!).
The var. amplicata of E. longifolia described by Bolus
(1905: 66) and upheld by Dulfer (1965: 40), was based
on a coloured painting of E. vestita var. coccinea Curtis:
t. 402 (1798). This plate does not depict any long-tubed
subspecies of E. viscaria and is clearly the red-coloured
form of E. vestita (31).
34.1. E. gallorum L. Bolus — see E. viscaria subsp.
gallorum (34d).
34.2. E. petrusiana E.G.H.OIiv. & I.M.Oliv., sp.
nov., Ericae viscariae L. affinis sed corolla breve
infundibuliformi-obconica, ± 8.5 x 5.0 mm, porcis longi-
tudinalibus, subglabra, subviscida, obscure flava, lobis
erectis et Ericae latiflorae L. Bolus sed lobis corollae bre-
vioribus 1.2 mm longis, coloris corollae flava non pur-
purea distinguitur. Figura 12.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3418 (Simonstown):
Kogelberg area, between Steenbras River and Kogelberg,
± 1000 ft [± 300 m], (-BB), 16 March 1969, Esterhuysen
32128 (BOL, holo.; NBG, K, PRE).
Erect low woody shrubs. Branches: numerous main
branches ± 30-50 mm long with continuous apical
growth, secondary branches few, very reduced, bearing a
subterminal flower; internodes ± 1 mm long; stems cov-
ered with very short, dense, stiff, spreading hairs and
occasional short-stalked glands. Leaves 4-6-nate, 8-12
mm long, erect, incurved, shortly acute, finely hairy to
FIGURE 12. — Erica petrusiana. type Esterhuysen 32128. A, flowering branch, x I; B. leaf; C, flower; D, flower opened laterally; E, bract; F,
bracteole: G, sepal, abaxial view (left), adaxial view (right); H, stamen, side, front and back views; I. gynoecium. Scale bars: B, E-I, 2 mm;
C, D, 4 mm.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
59
glabrous on both sides, sulcus narrow, closed at base;
petiole ± 18 mm long, puberulous. Inflorescence : 1 flower
subterminal on very short, secondary branches at each
node, all aggregated into a spike-like synflorescence, ±
15-20 mm long, towards ends of main branches, flowers
suberect to spreading; pedicel ± 6 mm long, indumentum
like stem; bract partially recaulescent ± V4 way up pedi-
cel, lanceolate, ± 1 mm long, glabrous, ciliate with ses-
sile glands, esulcate; bracteoles about '/2 way up pedicel,
linear-lanceolate, ± 3 mm long, finely hairy and ciliate
with sessile glands, green, sulcate for V3 their length.
Calyx 4-partite; segments adpressed to corolla, lanceo-
late. ± 4.0 x 0.8 mm, abaxially finely hairy, adaxially
with a basal, central zone of sessile sticky glands, sulcate
for 3/4 their length. Corolla 4-lobed, funnel-shaped-
obconic, widest at mouth, longitudinally ridged, sparsely
strigulose, dull yellow; lobes ± 1.2 x 3.5 mm, erect, mar-
gins entire. Stamens 8, free, included just below mouth;
filaments straight, glabrous, with vestigial appendages
just below thecae; anthers bilobed. oblong in adaxial
view, thecae oblong in lateral view, ± 1.5 x 0.5 mm,
smooth, pore V2 length of theca; pollen in tetrads. Ovary
4-locular, broadly obovoid. ± 1.8 x 1.8 mm, emarginate,
densely hairy with thick erect hairs, with basal nectaries;
style exserted, glabrous; stigma capitate. Figure 12.
Diagnostic features', corolla shortly funnel-
shaped/obconic with an open mouth, ± 8. 5-5.0 mm long,
longitudinally ridged, dull yellow, almost glabrous (only
a few minute stiff hairs) with no pustules, slightly sticky,
not nipped in below mouth, lobes erect, not spreading
(Figure 12).
Erica petrusiana is closely related to the short-tubed
subspecies of E. viscaria, but differs in the shape of the
corolla with its open mouth. It shares this character with
E. latiflora L. Bolus (303.1) which has an even more
open corolla with longer lobes. This latter relationship
points to the problem in the genus of the long-tubed and
short-tubed species being closely related, but placed very
far apart in the current sectional system.
The name is derived from the generic name of the
fish, Petrus rupestris, the ‘red steenbras' (red rock-bream),
after the locality, the Steenbras area which is the type and
only known locality. Esterhuysen records the plants as
very local, but common, in stony shaly soil and also on
sandstone ridge. She also records ‘corolla was yellow,
not very bright, but certainly yellow, slightly sticky’.
35. E. onosmiflora Salisb. — see E. viscaria subsp.
macrosepala (34c).
REFERENCES
ANDREWS. H.C. 1794—71830. Coloured engravings of heaths. London.
ANDREWS, H.C. 1804-71812. The Heathery, edn 1. London.
BAKER, H.A. 1958. Some notes on Erica coccinea L. with a descrip-
tion of a new variety. Journal of South African Botany 24:
75-79.
BAKER, H.A. 1967. A new Erica from the southern Cape and notes on
Erica desmantha and E. coccinea. Journal of South African
Botany 33: 177-184.
BAKER, H.A. 1973. New taxa in the genus Erica. Journal of South
African Botany 39: 205-211.
BAKER. H.A. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1967. Ericas in southern Africa.
Purnell, Cape Town.
BARTLING, T.E 1832. Plantae Eckloniana, Ericaceae. Linnaea 7:
627-652.
BAUER, F. 1793-1802. Delineations of exotick plants cultivated in the
royal garden at Kew. Aiton, London.
BENTHAM, G. 1839. Erica. In A.P De Candolle, Prodromus system-
atis naturalis regni vegetabilis 7: 580-733. Treuttel & Wiirtz,
Paris.
BERGIUS, P.J. 1767. Descriptiones plantarum ex Capite bonae spei.
Salvius, Stockholm.
BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. Flora capensis 4,1: 4—315. Reeve. London.
BOLUS, L. 1918. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Herbarium
2: 151-162.
BOLUS, L. 1923. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Herbarium
3: 172-181.
BOLUS. L. 1925. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Herbarium
4: 1-30.
BOLUS. L. 1928. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Herbarium
4: 130-136.
BOLUS, L. 1934. Plantarum novarum. Kew Bulletin 1933: 185-187.
BRITTEN, J 1899. Francis Bauer's ‘Delineations of exotick plants’.
Journal of Botany 37: 181-183.
CLEEVELY, R.J. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 2002. A preliminary note on the
publication dates of H.C. Andrews’ Coloured engravings of
heaths (1794—1830). Archives of Natural History 29: 245-264.
COMPTON, R.H. 1943. Plantae novae africanae. Journal of South
African Botany 9: 128-135.
COMPTON. R.H. 1953. Plantae novae africanae. Journal of South
African Botany 19: 119-132.
CURTIS, W. 1798. Botanical Magazine : t. 402.
DONN. J. 1796. Hortus cantabrigiensis. John Burrows, Cambridge.
DULFER, H. 1965. Revision der siidafrikanischen Arten der Gattung
Erica L. 2. Annalen des Natiirhistorischen Museums , Wien 68:
25-177.
GUNN, M. & CODD. L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
GUTHRIE. F. & BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. Flora capensis 4,1: 4—315.
Reeve. London.
KLOTZSCH. J.F. 1835. Ericearum. Linnaea 9: 634.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum edn 1,1: 353-356. Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1770. Dissertatio botanica de Erica. Edmann, Uppsala.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum altera. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS. C. fxl. 1782. Supplementum plantarum. Braunschweig.
LODDIGES, C. 1824. Botanical Cabinet', t. 1179.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1967. Three new species of Erica. Journal of South
African Botany 33: 197-204.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1977. The identity of Erica flavisepala. Bothalia 12:
195-197.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1986. The identity of Erica vinacea and notes on
hybridization in Erica. Bothalia 16: 35-38.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1988. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in southern
Africa. Bothalia 18: 1-10.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1993a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Blaeria. Kew Bulletin
48: 771-780.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XII.
The placing of the genus Blaeria into synonymy under Erica',
nomenclatural and taxonomic changes for southern Africa.
Bothalia 23: 1-7.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1994. Studies in the Ericoideae. XV. The generic
relationship between Erica and Ericinella. Bothalia 24:
121-126.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 2000. Systematics of Ericeae (Ericaceae:
Ericoideae): species with indehiscent and partially dehiscent
fruits. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 19: 1 — 483.
OLIVER, E.G.H., JARVIS, C.E. & CAFFERTY, S. in prep.
Typification of the Linnaean species of Erica. Bothalia ?
OLIVER. E.G.H. & OLIVER. I.M. 2001. Taxonomic problems in the
Erica filipendula complex. Yearbook of the Heather Society
2001:27-34.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & VAN WYK, C.M. 1993. Ericaceae. In T.H. Arnold
& B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribu-
tion. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62:
534-552.
OLIVER. I.M. & OLIVER. E.G.H. 2000. Field guide to the Ericas of
the Cape Peninsula. Protea Atlas Project, National Botanical
Institute, Cape Town.
60
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
PLUKENET, L. 1700. Almagesti botanici mantissa 45: t. 344, fig. 3.
London.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1802. Species of Erica. Transactions of the
Linnean Society 6: 316-388.
SALTER. T.M. 1936. Plantae novae africanae. Journal of South African
Botany 2: 60.
SALTER, T.M. 1951. Erica. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter, Flora of
the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.
SCHUMANN. D. & KIRSTEN. G. 1992. Ericas of South Africa.
Fernwood Press, Cape Town.
SEBA, A. 1735. Locupletissimi rerum naturalium thesauri, vol. 1.
Wetstenium. Amsterdam.
STEARN, W.T. 1957. Carl Linnaeus, Species plantarum, a facsimile of
the first edition, 1753. Ray Society. London.
THUNBERG, C.P 1785. Dissertatio botanica de Erica. (P. Elmstaedt),
1-12. Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis. Cotta, Stuttgardt.
WENDLAND, J.C. 1798. Botanische Beobachtungen. Gebriidern
Hahn. Hannover.
WILLDENOW, C. 1799. Species plantarum. Nauk. Berlin.
INDEX TO SPECIES
Erica L., 37
abietina L., 50
subsp. abietina, 50
subsp. atrorosea E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 50. 54
subsp. aurantiaca E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 51
subsp. constantiana E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 51, 54
subsp. diabolis E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 51
subsp. perfoliosa E.G.H.Oliv & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 52
subsp. petraea E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 53
var. echiiflora (Bolus) Salter, 51
annectens Guthrie & Bolus, 54
argentiflora Andrews, 54
aurea Andrews, 54
var. viscosissima Benth., 54
banksii (banksia) Andrews, 43
subsp. banksii, 43
subsp. comptonii ( Salter ) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv, stat. et comb,
nov., 44
subsp. purpurea ( Andrews ) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., stat. et comb,
nov., 43
var. purpurea Andrews, 43
var. purpurea (Andrews) Dulfer, 43
baueri (baueria) Andrews, 46
subsp. baueri, 46
subsp. gouriquae E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 46
beatricis Compton. 45
bowieana Lodd., 46
breviflora Dulfer, 41. 43
broadleyana Andrews, 46
casta Guthrie & Bolus, 54, 55
var. breviflora Guthrie & Bolus, 54
cerviciflora Salisb., 45
clavaeflora Salisb., 46
coccinea L., 38
sensu P.J.Bergius, 50
subsp. coccinea, 38
subsp. uniflora E.G.H.Oliv & l.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 39
var. echiiflora sensu Bolus, 51
var. inflata H. A. Baker, 40
var. intermedia (Klotzsch ex Benth.) Dulfer, 40
var. pubescens (Bolus) Dulfer, 38
var. willdenovii (Bolus) H. A. Baker, 40
comptonii Salter, 44
conica Lodd., 51, 54
decora Andrews, 56
echiiflora Andrews, 51, 56
var. purpurea Andrews, 56
exsurgens Andrews, 48, 51
filamentosa Andrews, 55
var. longiflora Bolus, 55
filipendula Benth., 46
subsp. filipendula, 46
subsp. parva E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 47
var. major Bolus, 48
var. minor Bolus, 47
follicularis Salisb., 40
var. inflata (H. A. Baker) Dulfer, 40
var. melastoma (Andrews) Dulfer, 40
gallorum L. Bolus, 56, 58
gilva J.C.Wcndl., 45, 46
globulifera Dulfer, 47
glutinosa Andrews, 56
grandiflora L.f., 48, 51
var. exsurgens E.G.H.Oliv., 51
hesseana J.C.Wendl. ex Klotzsch, 50, 54
hibbertii (hibbertia) Andrews, 48
intermedia Klotzsch ex Benth., 40
subsp. albiflora E.G.H.Oliv & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 41
subsp. intermedia, 40
leucosiphon L.Bolus, 44
lineata Benth., 41, 43
longifolia Bauer, 56
var. amplicata Bolus, 55
var. breviflora Dulfer, 58
var. contractu Bolus, 56
var. maritima Bolus, 55
var. squarrosa Bolus, 56
var. stricta Dulfer, 56
var. viridis Bolus, 56
longisepala Guthrie & Bolus, 48
mammosa L., 45
mariae Guthrie & Bolus, 54, 55
melastoma Andrews, 40
subsp. melastoma, 40, 41
subsp. minor E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., subsp. nov., 40
monadelphia Andrews, 41, 43
nematophylla Guthrie & Bolus, 55
nevillei L.Bolus, 50
onosmiflora Salisb., 56, 59
patersonia Andrews, 58
patersonii L.Bolus, 58
penduliflora E.G.H.Oliv., 48
penicillata Andrews, 42
penicillata Benth., 43
petiveri L.. 38
var. intermedia (Klotzsch ex Benth.) Bolus, 40
var. melastoma (Andrews) Benth.. 40
var. pubescens Bolus, 38
var. willdenovii Bolus, 40
petrusiana E.G.H.Oliv & l.M.Oliv., sp. nov., 58
phylicifolia Salisb., 50
pinea J.C.Wendl., 56
pinea Thunb., 54
var. argentiflora (Andrews) Bolus, 54
var. viscosissima (Benth.) Bolus, 54
plukenetii L., 41
subsp. bredensis E.G.H.Oliv. <& l.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 41
subsp. breviflora ( Dulfer ) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., stat. et comb,
nov., 43
subsp. lineata {Benth.) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., stat. et comb, nov., 43
subsp. penicellata (Andrews) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., stat. et
comb, nov., 42
subsp. plukenetii, 41
var. bicarinata Bolus, 42
var. brachysepala Barth, 41
var. brevifolia Bolus, 41
var. densa Barth, 41
porteri Compton, 49, 50
primulina Bolus, 44
purpurea Andrews, 50
pustulate t H. A. Baker, 58
quadrisulcata L.Bolus, 50
regia Barth, 54
subsp. mariae (Guthrie & Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. & l.M.Oliv., stat. et
comb, nov., 54, 55
subsp. regia, 54, 55
var. variegata Bolus, 54
var. williana Bolus, 54
revolvens Barth, 42
scariosci Thunb., 43
sceptriformis Salisb., 46
sebema Donn, 38
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
61
sessiliflora L.f , 46
var. clavaeflora (Salisb.) Bolus, 46
var. oblanceolata Bolus, 46
var. sceptrifonnis (Salisb.) Bolus, 46
sphenanthera Tausch, 45
tenax L. Bolus, 48, 49
thomae L.Bolus, 49
var. brevisepala L.Bolus, 49
vestiflua Salisb., 40, 41
vestita Tluinb., 55
var. coccinea Curtis, 55
var .fiilgida Andrews, 55
viridiflora Andrews, 44
subsp. primulina (Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.,
subsp. redacta E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., subsp. nov.. 45
subsp. viridiflora, 44
viridis Andrews, 56
viscaria L., 56
subsp. gallorum (L.Bolus) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., stat. et comb,
nov., 56
subsp. longifolia E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., comb, et stat. nov., 56
subsp. macrosepala E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv., stat. et nom. nov., 56
subsp. pendula E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv, subsp. nov., 58
subsp. pustulata (H. A. Baker) E.G.H.Oliv. & I.M.Oliv.. stat. et
comb, nov., 58
subsp. viscaria, 56
var. decora (Andrews) Bolus, 56
stat. et comb. nov.. 44 var. hispida Bolus, 56
1
Bothalia 32.1: 63-83 (2002)
Notes on African plants
HYACINTHACEAE
A NEW COMBINATION IN DAUBENYA
The circumscription of the genus Daubenya has
recently undergone substantial modification as a result of
phylogenetic analysis of plastid DNA sequence data
(Goldblatt & Manning 2000; Van der Merwe et al. in
prep.). The genus now includes the previously monotyp-
ic genera Amphisiphon and Androsiphon, as well as the
taxa previously recognized in the genus Neobakeria.
These various genera were distinguished from one
another primarily on the basis of floral differences that
are now understood to be related to different pollination
strategies. Despite the exaggerated effect that these floral
specializations have on the appearance of the plants, the
species accord perfectly in vegetative morphology. The
genus is characterized by the two prostrate or spreading
leaves, glabrous and rather glossy above with impressed
longitudinal striations along the main veins, with sheaths
that split vertically on drying to form a neck of papery
strips. The subcorymbose or racemose inflorescence
develops small or medium-sized bracts subtending white
to yellow or red flowers with a narrow perianth tube. In
a few species the upper bracts are larger than the lower
and form a ± conspicuous sterile coma at the tip of the
inflorescence.
Among the taxa recently transferred to Daubenya
(Goldblatt & Manning 2000) was the species known until
then as Massonia angustifolia L.f. This species was
described by the younger Linnaeus in 1 782, based on the
collections and notes of Thunberg. No specimen was des-
ignated as the holotype and although the description is too
brief to be diagnostic in any way, his account of the
species which appeared in Hortus kewensis (Aiton 1789)
a few years later, is accompanied by a fine engraving
(Figure 1). Thunberg’s own description of the species
appeared after Linnaeus’ under the name Massonia lan-
ceolata Thunb. The latter name was lectotypified by
Jessop (1976), based on Thunberg s.n. ( UPS -
THUNB7990) and the same collection was later also des-
ignated as the lectotype of Massonia angustifolia L.f. by
U. & D. Miiller-Doblies ( 1997).
As understood in recent revisions of the group (Jessop
1976; Miiller-Doblies 1997), Massonia angustifolia was
readily distinguished from other species of Massonia by
its relatively smaller bracts, cucullate tepals and orange
filaments (Figure 2). These small bracts are characteris-
tic of the group of species previously segregated as
Polyxena subgenus Astemma (Baker 1896) and later as
the genus Neobakeria (Schlechter 1924; Phillips 1951).
In contrast, all species of Massonia s. str. have uniform-
ly white or pinkish flowers that are subtended by large,
leafy bracts and the infructescences are invariably sub-
globose on account of the highly condensed, corymbose
inflorescence typical of the genus. In addition, the tepals
in true species of Massonia display a highly characteris-
tic orientation not found in other genera in the family.
Initially reflexed from the base, they then curve outwards
more or less abruptly, forming a sigmoid fold. Even a
cursory look at the engraving of M. angustifolia pub-
lished in Hortus kewensis reveals that the plant depicted
has the large bracts characteristic of true Massonia
species plus a clear indication of a sigmoid curvature in
the tepals. It is clear, therefore, that this illustration does
not coincide with the concept of Massonia angustifolia
as understood by recent authors (Jessop 1976; Miiller-
Doblies & Miiller-Doblies 1997; Goldblatt & Manning
2000).
Among the specimens in the Thunberg herbarium are
only two sheets labelled M. lanceolata , one of them the
lectotype of both M. lanceolata and M. angustifolia. This
sheet ( UPS-THUNB7990 ) bears two complete flowering
FIGURE 1. — Massonia angustifolia
L.f. from Hortus kewensis
(Aiton 1789).
64
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
specimens plus three separate infructescences lacking
both leaves and bulbs. The other sheet (UPS-
THUNB7989) bears three flowering plants only. The
flowering plants on both sheets match the illustration of
M. angustifolia perfectly, but the fruiting stems on the
lectotype are clearly not from the same species as they
are rather more racemose with small floral bracts. It is
quite clear that both Linnaeus and Thunberg were refer-
ring to the leafing and flowering material in their con-
cept. The fruiting stems must therefore be excluded from
the lectotype material. The type collection of M. angus-
tifolia was made by Thunberg along the Roggeveld
Escarpment in November 1774. All species of Massonia
and Daubenya are winter-growing and winter-flowering,
and at that time of the year the plants would have been in
fruit. Thunberg was accompanied on this journey by the
Scottish plant collector Masson, who had been sent out
to South Africa to collect plants for the Royal Botanic
Gardens at Kew. It was Masson’s collections, received at
Kew in 1775 and later flowered there, that formed the
basis for the engraving of M. angustifolia that appeared
in Hortus kewensis in 1789, and subsequently for a later
FIGURE 2. — Daubenya marginata
(Willd. ex Kunth) J.C. Man-
ning from Hooker’s leones
Plantarum (1888) (as Potyxena
haemanthoides Baker).
illustration in Curtis's Botanical Magazine (Ker Gawler
1804). It is almost certain, therefore, that the fruiting
bulbs collected by the men in November were similarly
flowered in cultivation to provide the flowering material
for the Thunberg herbarium, probably in the garden that
they established in Cape Town for growing their collec-
tions. One can only surmise that Thunberg unwittingly
combined flowering plants of the one species with previ-
ously collected fruiting specimens of a second species.
This raises the question of the true identity of
Massonia angustifolia. There is no doubt that the species
is actually a smooth-leaved form of M. echinata L.f. This
species is common along the Roggeveld Escarpment and
is extremely variable in leaf vestiture, even within popu-
lations. It is characterized in the genus by its narrowly
tubular flowers with relatively short stamens and tepals
with a sigmoid fold (Figure 3). The sole anomaly in this
identification is the extremely long perianth tube depict-
ed in the engraving in Hortus kewensis (Figure 1 ). This
long tube is not, however, matched by the Thunberg
herbarium material and must represent either an abnor-
FIGURE 3. — Massonia echinata L.f.
from The Flowering Plants
of South A frica 1 1 : t. 429 (as
M. bolusiae W.F. Barker).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
65
mality resulting from etiolation of the cultivated plants
grown under low light intensity or, more probably, a mis-
representation by the artist who incorrectly identified the
junction between flower and pedicel. M. angustifolia and
M. echinata were both described contemporaneously by
Linnaeus. The latter is a well-known species and M.
angustifolia is therefore best placed into synonomy
under M. echinata. The oldest available name for the
plant currently known as Daubenya angustifolia is either
Massonia marginata Willd. ex Kunth or Massonia rugu-
losa Licht. ex Kunth. Again, both species were described
in the same publication. Enquiries suggest that the
Lichtenstein material is no longer extant (R. Vogt pers.
comm.) but the Willdenow collection is a fine specimen
that coincides with the current concept of the taxon and
is therefore chosen here to represent the species.
The confusion between M. angustifolia and the taxon
now correctly known as D. marginata can probably be
traced to Baker’s treatment in Flora capensis (Baker
1896). An earlier coloured engraving of the species (Ker
Gawler 1804), based on Masson’s original collections,
shows all of the characteristics evident in the engraving in
Hortus kewensis, thereby reaffirming the Linnean con-
cept of the species. Likewise, Baker’s interpretation of M.
angustifolia as having white, fragrant flowers with
reflexed tepals also coincides perfectly with the original
concept of the species. However, the second of the two
specimens cited by him {Zeyher s.n., K, drawing BOL!;
the other is the typical Thunberg material ) represents the
plant described as Massonia zeyheri Kunth, which was
considered by some authors (Jessop 1976) to be conspe-
cific with D. marginata. Both Jessop (1976) and MUller-
Doblies & Miiller-Doblies (1997) were apparently misled
by the fictitiously long tube in the original engraving and
by the misattributed Zeyher collection, into equating the
species with M. marginata and M. zeyheri respectively.
Daubenya marginata {Willd. ex Kunth) J.C. Man-
ning & A.M.van der Merwe, comb. nov.
Massonia marginata Willd. ex Kunth, Enumeratio plantarum 4:
299 (1843). Polyxena marginata (Willd. ex Kunth) Benth. & Hook.f.
ex T.Durand & Schinz: 366 (1893). Neobakeria marginata (Willd. ex
Kunth.) Schltr.: 150 (1924). Type: South Africa. Caput Bona Spei [B-
WILLD6373. holo.-NBG. photo.!).
Massonia rugulosa Licht. ex Kunth: 299 (1843). Polyxena rugu-
losa (Lichtenst. ex Kunth) Baker: 420 (1896). Neobakeria rugulosa
(Licht. ex Kunth) Schltr.: 150 (1924). Type: Caput Bona Spei,
Lichtenstein 224 (B, holo., ?destroyed).
Polyxena haemanthoides Baker: t. 1727 (1888). Neobakeria hae-
manthoides (Baker) Schltr.: 150 (1924). Type: South Africa. Nuweveld
Mountains near Fraserburg. Bolus 5493 (BOL!. lecto., here designated,
G. SAM).
Massonia angustifolia auct. non M. angustifolia L.f. ( = M. echina-
ta L.f)
Massonia echinata L.f: 193 (1782). Type: South
Africa, Crescit juxta margines montis, dicate Bocklands
Berg |= Bokkeveld Mountains). Thunberg s.n. ( UPS-
7992, holo.!).
Massonia angustifolia L.f.: 193 (1782). M. lanceolata Tliunb.: 40
(1794) nom. superfl. Polyxena angustifolia (L.f.) Baker: 419 (1896).
Neobakeria angustifolia (L.f.) Schltr.: 150 (1924). Daubenya angusti-
folia (L.f.) A.M.van der Merwe & J.C. Manning in Goldblatt &
Manning: 713 (2000). Type: South Africa, Crescit in summo monte
Onderste Roggeveldt, 16.11.1774 ( UPS-THUNB7990 excl. fruiting
fragments, holo.!), syn. nov.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our thanks to Dr R. Vogt of the Botanische Museum
Berlin-Dahlem, who was extremely helpful in forward-
ing a high-resolution digital image of the type of
Massonia marginata. and to Dee Snijman for her useful
comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
AITON. W. 1789. Hortus kewensis. edn 1. Nicol, London.
BAKER. J.G. 1888. Polyxena haemanthoides Baker. Hooker's leones
Plantarum 18: t. 1727.
BAKER. J.G. 1896. Liliaceae. Flora capensis 6,2: 385-528.
DURAND, T. & SCHINZ, H. 1893. Conspectus florae africae, vol. 2.
Jardin Botanique de l'etat, Brussels.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000. Cape Plants. A conspectus
of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9.
JESSOP. J.P 1976. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in Africa: 6. The
taxonomy of Massonia and allied genera. Journal of South
African Botany 42: 401 — 437.
KER GAWLER. J.B. 1804. Massonia angustifolia. Curtis's Botanical
Magazine 19: t. 736.
KUNTH. K.S. 1843. Enumeratio plantarum 4. Stuttgart & Tubingen.
LINNAEUS, C. fil. 1782 ('1781')- Supplementarum plantarum.
Orphantrophius, Braunschweig.
MULLER-DOBLIES. U. & D. 1997. A partial revision of the tribe
Massonieae (Hyacinthaceae). Feddes Repertorium 108: 49-96.
PHILLIPS. E. P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants.
Memoirs of the Botanical Sun’ey of South Africa No. 25.
SCHLECHTER. R. 1924. Drei neue Gattungen der Liliaceen aus
Siidafrika. Notizblatt des Botanischsen Gartens und Museums
z u Berlin-Dahlem 9: 145-151.
THUNBERG, C.P 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman, Uppsala.
VAN DER MERWE, A , BELLSTEDT. D.U., MARAIS, E M. &
HARLEY, E.H. in prep. Phylogenetic relationships in subtribe
Massoniinae of tribe Massoniae (Hyacinthaceae) based on non-
coding trnL-trnF chloroplast sequences.
J.C. MANNING* and A.M. VAN DER MERWE**
* Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** Department of Botany. University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag XL
7602 Matieland, Stellenbosch.
MS received: 2001-02-12.
THYMELAEACEAE
SYSTEMATICS OF PASSERINA TRUNCATA AND A NEW SUBSPECIES MONTICOLA
INTRODUCTION Lachnaea conglomerata L. (Rhamnaceae) (Cafferty &
Beyers 1999; Brummitt 2000) has necessitated nomen-
Most of the Passerina L. species are endemic to the clatural changes to P. glomerata Thunb., a taxon also
Cape Floristic Region. The rejection of the name recognized in the now outdated revision of Thoday
66
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
(1924). In the present paper the name P. glomerata is
rejected and Passerina rigida Wikstr. var. truncata
Meisn. is raised to the species level. Based on leaf anato-
my (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999, 2000, 2001a) as well
as vegetative and floral morphology (Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk 2001b), a new subspecies of P. truncata is described.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Material from the following herbaria was studied: B,
BM, BOL, BREM, C, G, GRA, HAL, K, LINN, M,
MEL, MO, NBG, NCY, P, PR, PRC, PRE, S, SAM, SBT,
SRGH, TCD, UPS, W and WU. Lor the anatomical
study, both fresh and rehydrated leaves were used. Lor
Passerina truncata subsp. truncata, vouchers of
Bredenkamp 973, 977, 984, 985, 988, 994, and 1002
were used; for P. truncata subsp. monticola, Stokoe 8040
and Esterhuysen 28587 were used.
Light microscope ( LM ) was used in general leaf
anatomical studies. Methods used to prepare transverse
sections and cuticle preparations are described by
Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (2000).
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to
study the leaf surface (including epicuticular waxes) and
to verify the structure of the cuticular membrane
(Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2000).
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) was used to
study the structure of the mucilaginous epidermal cell
walls (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999).
1. Passerina truncata (Meisn.) Bredenkamp &
A.E.van Wyk, stat. nov. Type: Western Cape, near
Tulbagh Waterfall, April 1865, Zeyher 43 (K ! , lecto.,
here designated; MEL!, MO!, NBG!, S!, W!).
Passerina rigida Wikstr. var. truncata Meisn. in A.D.C., Prodromus
systematis naturalis 14 563 (1857); C.H. Wright; 13 (1915); Thoday:
153 (1924).
Passerina rigida Wikstr. var. tetragona Meisn.: 563 (1857) pro
parte quoad specimen Drege 2971\ C.H. Wright: 13 (1915); Thoday:
153 (1924). Type: Western Cape, circa Ezelsbank Drege 2971 (P!,
lecto., here designated; K!).
Lachnaea conglomerata L.: 560 (1753); L.: 374 (1784); Willd.: 434
(1799); Wikstr.: 323 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825); Meisn.: 562 (1857);
Cafferty & Beyers: 171, 172(1999); Brummitt: 805 (2000) nomen reji-
ciendum. Passerina conglomerata Thunb. fide Wikstr.: 322 (1818)
nom. illeg.
Passerina glomerata sphalm. quoad L. conglomerata L. sensu
Thunb.: 75 (1794); Willd.: 434 (1799); Wikstr.: 323 (1818); Thunb: 374
(1825); Meisn.: 562 (1857); Cafferty & Beyers: 171, 172 (1999).
Lachnaea glomerata sphalm. quoad L. conglomerata L. sensu Thunb.:
75 (1794). Passerina ericoides sensu Thunb.: 374 (1825) non L.: 236
( 1767, 1771 ). Passerina glomerata sensu Thoday: 153 (1924) nom. illeg.
Shrubs, shrublets or low stunted shrublets (0.2—)
0.4 — 1 .5(— 2.0) m high. Stems branching from base to grow-
ing points; branchlets ascending, straight or arcuate (subsp.
monticola), greyish brown, younger branchlets whitish
tomentose, older branchlets with whitish scales, remains of
indumentum and scales flaking off with cork on older
branchlets; cork fissured between leaf scars or tesselate,
scaberulent. Leaves sessile, decussate, imbricate on young
branchlets, diverging at 15°^15°, four-ranked, cymbiform;
lamina inversely ericoid, narrowly oblong to oblong in out-
line, length x depth ( 1 .7— )2.0— 3 .0(— 4.0) x (0.6-)0. 8-1.0
(—1.7) mm, becoming keeled in upper part; adaxial surface
concave, tomentose; abaxial surface laterally compressed
and glabrous; apex truncate or rounded (subsp. monticola)',
base dilated; margins involute. Inflorescences comprising
polytelic synflorescences, spikes reduced, resembling ter-
minal subcapitulate inflorescences, each characterized by
two terminal leaves with axillary blind-ending rudimenta-
ry flowers, enveloping minute growing point; proliferating
growth less common; subcapitulate inflorescences ± ellip-
soid, pale green or straw-coloured, 4— 8-flowered. Bracts
enveloping flowers and fruits, accrescent after anthesis,
becoming more coriaceous and rounded at fruit set, decus-
sate, imbricate, sessile, appressed or ascending, obovate to
widely obovate in outline, length x depth (2.5— )2.9— 4.0 x
1 ,4(— 2.4) mm, adaxially concave, villous, abaxially con-
vex, glabrous, coriaceous to thickly coriaceous, ribbed
(subsp. monticola) or ribbed and reticulately veined on
both sides of main vein, concolorous, pale green or greyish
green, senescing to yellowish brown; base cuneate; main
vein extending into obtuse to acute apex; margins involute.
Flowers actinomorphic, bisexual, hypogynous. Floral
envelope 4.9-6.4 mm long, comprising a hypanthium
(fused calyx and androecium) and calyx lobes, papyra-
ceous and yellow-pink during pollination, dehydrated after
shedding of pollen, turning red to brown. Pedicel very
short or absent. Receptacle very short. Disc absent.
Hypanthium a membranous cylindric tube, glabrous at
ovary or apex of ovary tomentose, neck tomentose, 0.7-0.8
mm long, abscission tissue and articulation plane absent.
Calyx petaloid; lobes 4, imbricate in bud, flexed in flower;
outer lobes concave ovate or cymbiform, adaxially sparse-
ly pubescent or apex tomentose, abaxially glabrous; inner
lobes oblong to elliptic or widely obovate, adaxially
sparsely pubescent or tomentose, abaxially glabrous.
Corolla absent. Petaloid scales absent. Androecium dimor-
phic, diplostemonous, arising from hypanthium at separa-
tion point of calyx lobes; filaments of antipetalous whorl
0.9-1. 2 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 1.4 mm
long; anthers (0.8— )0.9 x 0.4 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous
and 4-locular. Ovary superior (2.4-)2.5 x 0.9 mm, uniloc-
ular, placentation parietal; ovule 1, pendulous, laterally
attached near top of ovary. Style situated laterally from top
of ovary, maintaining lateral position in hypanthium neck,
reaching beyond hypanthium rim. Stigma ± globose, mop-
like or penicillate. Fruit an achene with pericarp membra-
nous and dry, 2.5 x 1.2 mm, enveloped by persistent, loose-
ly arranged hypanthium, the latter fragmenting over widest
circumference of fruit, resulting in shedding of fragmented
hypanthium, calyx lobes and androecium. Seed broadly
fusiform with outgrowths at both micropylar and funicular
ends; tegmen black and shiny, often with white spots;
endosperm formation nuclear, but later becoming cellular
throughout. Conservation status: Not Threatened (IUCN
Species Survival Commission 1994).
Key to subspecies
la Shrubs or shrublets from various habitats; stems branching
from base, straight; branchlets straight; leaves diverging
at ± 15°, narrowly oblong to oblong, apex truncate,
keeled, appearing humped on the back; bracts appressed.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
67
thickly coriaceous, ribbed and reticulately veined on
each side of main vein, greyish green, senescing to yel-
lowish brown: main vascular bundle variously arranged.
types B2, 3, 5 (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001a)
la. subsp. truncata
lb Shrubs or low shrublets from mountain habitats; stems often
stunted; branchlets lax, arcuate; leaves diverging at ±
45°, narrowly oblong, apex truncate to rounded and
keeled; bracts ascending, coriaceous, ribbed on each
side of main vein, pale green; main vascular bundle
bordering on abaxial epidermis, type B6 . . lb. subsp. monticola
Leaf anatomy
Leaf inverse-dorsiventral, epistomatic. Outline in
transverse section (t/s) transversely elliptic. Lamina
width (570— )740— 830(— 980 ) pm, midrib in t/s (290-)
330— +60(— 500) pm. Adaxial epidermis uniseriate, sto-
mata anomocytic, cuticular membrane (CM) ± 2 pm
thick; periclinal cell diam. 15 pm, anticlinal cell diam.
12.5 pm. Abaxial epidermis in surface view, cells
arranged randomly, isodiametric or slightly oblong, pen-
tagonal to heptagonal, (30-)40-55 x 30— 10 pm; CM
smooth or with several domes per cell, wax platelets
scarce, square to oblong, raised 30°-90°, rounded to
sharp edges; CM in t/s (20-)30— f0(— 50 ) pm thick, peri-
clinal cell diam. (20-)30-45 pm, anticlinal cell diam.
(25-)30-60 pm, epidermal cells large, with thick inner
periclinal cell walls, becoming mucilaginous and con-
taining abundant amounts of tanniniferous compounds;
outer periclinal wall domed. MesophylL palisade
parenchyma in 2 or 3 layers of elongated cells with abun-
dant chloroplasts and tanniniferous compounds, density
3-5 cells per 50 pm; spongy parenchyma of irregular
cells ± densely arranged with largest intercellular spaces
close to vascular bundles. Main vascular bundle central-
ly arranged (type B2) (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001a),
touching palisade parenchyma abaxially (type B3), or
with palisade parenchyma abaxial of main vascular bun-
dle specializing into collenchyma, containing ample
amounts of tanniniferous substances (type B5), or bor-
dering on abaxial epidermis (type B6) (subsp. montico-
la), ovate with ample sclerenchyma, or widely to very
widely ovate with sclerenchyma bulging laterally.
Bundle sheath of (2 1— )25— 30(— 32 ) parenchymatous
cells, ± rounded, tanniniferous substances strongly pre-
sent adaxially or specializing into collenchyma abaxially.
Secondary growth present (subsp. truncata). Secondary
vascular bundles 2^1 on each side of main bundle.
Sclerenchymatous hypodermal sheath absent. Figure 4.
Nomenclatural notes
Key to tissues
Spongy parenchyma
Palisade parenchyma
Parenchyma
Xylem
Phloem
Sclerenchyma
Epidermis
?oWo< Cuticular membrane
.02,0-0*0.
Collenchyma
FIGURE 4. — Diagrammatic representation of t/s of leaves. P. trunca-
ta subsp. truncata characterized by leaf structural types B2, 3
& 5, and subsp. monticola by type B6.
9577 (UPS) (Figure 5), bears the inscription ' Passerina
glomerata a (Lin. herb.)’ and was determined by Thoday
as the type of P. glomerata Thunb. However, specimens
504.2 & 504.3 referred to in the Linnean Herbarium
(Savage 1945), are both P. paleacea Wikstr., suggesting
that Thunberg did not have a clear interpretation of
P. glomerata. The specimen Herb. Swartzii s.n. (S) bears
the name Lachnaea conglomerata L. and has been cor-
rectly identified as P. glomerata fide Thunberg (1794)
and Thoday (1924). Unfortunately, neither Thunberg nor
any of the contemporary Swedish botanists were aware
that the illustrated synonym in Breyne on which
Lachnaea conglomerata sensu Linnaeus was based, rep-
resents Phylica stipularis L. (Rhamnaceae). Thunberg
clearly intended to base his new name on the Linnean
concept, referring to 'Linn Syst. 374’ and 'Lin. herb.’.
Lachnaea conglomerata was described by Linnaeus
(1753), with synonyms from Plukenet (1700), Ray
(1704) and Breyne (1678). This name was subsequently
also used by Linnaeus in Sy sterna vegetabilium (1784).
However, there is no material of this taxon in the
Linnean Herbarium (Savage 1945). The only original
element found, is the illustration by Breyne (1678),
determined as Phylica stipularis L. by Cafferty & Beyers
(1999).
Thunberg (1794), in error, made the illegitimate com-
bination Passerina glomerata , citing L. glomerata Linn.
Syst. 374’ in synonymy. The specimen Herb. Thunberg
Willdenow (1799) once again reinstated L. conglom-
erata. sinking P. glomerata Thunb. Wikstrom (1818)
retained P. conglomerata , citing both P. glomerata and
L. conglomerata in synonymy. Wikstrom’s concept is
clearly illustrated by two specimens from the Bergius
Herbarium (SBT) bearing the inscriptions Lachnaea
conglomerata Linn, and Passerina conglomerata Thunb.
Adding to the confusion about the concept of the taxon,
he referred to 'Hautbay’, today Hout Bay, as the locality
for the species, which is the known habitat of both P.
paleacea and P. ericoides L. Thunberg (1825) accepted
Wikstrom’s concept of P. glomerata. citing P. ericoides
in synonymy. This confusion is reflected by many
68
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
At Sta'
y.*. jx
( 7^n»t<yv 1 /if , <6 ys~
Dntormin.aviti Bdk o-eL*
i 4
I XI
t&pkft WA. ' /--T/vr/u^,, 4J.)
FIGURE 5, — The specimen Herb. Thunberg 9577 (UPS), bearing
inscription 'Passerina glomerata a (Lin. herb.)’ and determined
by Thoday as the type of P. glomerata Thunb.
herbarium specimens, e.g. Thunberg s.n. (S), presently
identified as P. glomerata Thunb., misidentified as P. eri-
coides ( = Lachnaea conglomerata ); the specimen Herb.
Thunberg 9596D (UPS), identified as P. paleacea by
Thoday in 1922, with inscriptions lP. ericoides Linn.’
and 'L. conglomerata (Linn.)’. Recognizing the continu-
ous confusion, Meisner (1857) cited both P. glomerata
and L. conglomerata in synonymy under P. ericoides.
In the interest of nomenclatural stability, the proposal
by Cafferty & Beyers (1999) to reject the name
Lachnaea conglomerata L. was recommended by the
Committee for Spermatophyta (Brummitt 2000). Article
56.1 of the International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature (Greuter et al. 2000) states that combinations
based on nomina rejicienda should be similarly rejected.
As Thunberg clearly indicated that his concept of
P. glomerata was based on the Linnean concept of L.
conglomerata , the name P. glomerata is also rejected.
Meisner (1857) placed both P. glomerata and L. con-
glomerata in synonymy under P. ericoides. Furthermore,
he described two new varieties under P. rigida , namely
var. tetragona and var. truncata. Both these varieties
included authentic material later cited by Thoday (1924)
in his description of P. glomerata. Based on the specimen
Herb. Thunberg 9577 (UPS) (Figure 5) as the type,
Thoday ( 1924) reinstated P. glomerata Thunb. and placed
Meisner’s two varieties in synonymy, unaware of the fact
that Thunberg (1794) had made the illegitimate combina-
tion P. glomerata , in error. The rejection of L. conglomer-
ata (Cafferty & Beyers 1999; Brummitt 2000) and P.
glomerata , implied the choice of a new name for the exist-
ing species. As all the specimens included in P. rigida var.
truncata are delineated by \foliis ramulo adpressis vel
semipatulatis truncatis' and their distributions coincide
perfectly with the distribution of the previously known
P. glomerata sensu Thoday, the var. truncata was conse-
quently selected and is here raised to the species level. The
var. tetragona included Drege 2971 (K, P) from Ezelsbank
in Western Cape, presently placed in synonymy under
P. truncata , and Drege s.n. from Stormberg in the Eastern
Cape, presently identified as P. montana.
la. subsp. truncata
Diagnostic characters and relationships: the typical
subspecies may easily be distinguished by its decussate,
imbricate, four-ranked leaves, spreading at an angle of
15°. The leaves are abaxially laterally compressed and
glabrous, narrowly oblong to oblong, with a dilated base
and a truncate, keeled apex, appearing humped on the
back. Inflorescences are reduced spikes, terminally sub-
capitulate. Bracts are obovate to widely obovate. The
lamina is villous on the inside and glabrous on the out-
side. It is thickly coriaceous, ribbed and reticulately
veined on each side of the main vein, which extends into
an obtuse apex. Bracts are greyish green in colour,
senescing to yellowish brown. P. truncata could be con-
fused with P. quadrifaria Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk
ined., which is characterized by shortened leaf-bearing
branchlets with closely arranged nodes, very short
internodes and leaves spreading at an angle of 45°. The
abaxial surface is convex and tomentose in young leaves
and the leaf apex is rounded.
Etymology : the specific epithet is from the Latin trim-
cat us = ending very abruptly, as if cut straight across. It
describes the truncate apex of the leaves.
Distribution .and habitat: subspecies truncata is con-
fined mainly to the Fynbos (Rebelo 1998) and Succulent
Karoo Biomes (Hoffman 1998) of the Northern and
Western Cape. It occurs in the Northwestern, South-
western, Karoo Mountain and Southeastern centres of
endemism (Goldblatt & Manning 2000) within the Cape
Floral Region. In the Northern Cape, it is distributed from
Steinkopf, through Namaqualand, Nieuwoudtville and
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
69
HEIGHT ABOVE SEA I
FIGURE 6. — Known distribution of
P. truncata subsp. truncata.
Vanrhynsdorp to Wolfberg. This subspecies is common in
the Western Cape, where it is distributed from
Vanrhynsdorp, the Koue Bokkeveld, Clanwilliam, the
Olifants River Valley, Citrusdal, along the Cederberg
Mountains, to Malmesbury, Ceres, Tulbagh, Matjiesfontein
and Seven Weeks Poort. The most southeasterly known
locality is Baviaanskloof near Patensie ( Bayliss 546).
Subsp. truncata is adapted to a wide range of habitats. It
occurs on low-lying plains as well as on several mountain
ranges, where it is common on level ground, rocky slopes
and along watercourses. Subsp. truncata is one of the most
dominant taxa between Tulbagh and Clanwilliam, where
the size of the shrubs varies from 0.4— 1 ,5(— 2.0) m on flat
areas and plains. They grow prolifically, and during flow-
ering time yellow, yellowish pink and red flowers can often
be seen on the same plant, representing various stages of
maturation. This subspecies is also common in the arid
Karoo environment of the Witteberg Mountains near
Matjiesfontein. where it grows in rocky areas. In extreme-
ly dry areas of Namaqualand, the Ceres-Karoo and on top
of the Skurweberg and Cederberg Mountains, the grow th
form of the subsp. truncata changes to a hardy, skeletal,
less-branched, sclerophyllous shrublet. with yellow, coria-
ceous leaves, closely arranged on the stem, but with each
growing point protected by a pair of conspicuous, coria-
ceous bracts. Figure 6.
lb. subsp. monticola Bredenkamp & A.E.van W\'k,
subsp. nov., a subspecie typica praecipue habitu differt.
Frutices vel fruticuli in habitu montano in fissuris rupi-
um radicantes. Ramuli adscendentes, laxi, arcuati. Folia
ad angulum 45° divergentia. anguste oblonga, carinata,
apice truncato vel rotundato. Bracteae adscendentes,
obovatae ad late obovatae, coriaceae, utrinque costae
costatae, pallide virides.
TYPUS. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Robert-
son Division, Omklaar, (-DD), 1923, Stokoe 22330
(PRE!, holo.; K!, iso.).
Shrubs or low stunted shrublets 0.2-1. 3 m high, often
rooted in rock crevices. Stems often stunted, branching
profusely on younger growth, branchlets ascending,
arcuate; younger branchlets densely whitish tomentose;
cork fissured between yellowish leaf scars. Leaves
diverging at ± 45°, narrowly oblong in outline, length x
depth (2.4— )2.6(— 3.0) x 0.6-1. 7 mm; abaxial surface lat-
erally compressed and glabrous; apex truncate to round-
ed; base dilated. Inflorescences subcapitulate, ± ellip-
soid. pale green. Bracts ascending, obovate to widely
obovate; lamina adaxially concave, villous, abaxially
convex, glabrous, coriaceous, ribbed, pale green, base
cuneate; main vein extending into obtuse to acute apex;
length x depth ( 2.5— )2.9 x 1.5 mm. Flowers : floral enve-
lope ± 4.9 mm long. Hypanthium: apex of ovary tomen-
tose, neck tomentose. ± 0.7 mm long. Calyx: outer lobes
concave ovate, apex adaxially tomentose, abaxially
glabrous; inner lobes widely obovate, adaxially tomen-
tose, abaxially glabrous. Androecium: filaments of
antipetalous whorl ± 1 .2 mm and antisepalous whorl ± 1.4
mm long; anthers 0.9 x 0.4 mm. Ovary 2.5 x 0.9 mm.
Conservation status: Not Threatened (IUCN Species
Survival Commission 1994). Figure 7.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
truncata subsp. monticola can easily be distinguished
from the typical subspecies by its growth form. The
plants are often low shrublets rooted in rock crevices on
mountain peaks. The stems are stunted, branching pro-
fusely on younger growth, the branchlets are ascending,
lax and arcuate. The leaves spread at 45°, are narrowly
oblong and the apex is truncate to rounded and keeled.
The bracts retain the characteristic shape of subsp. trun-
cata, but are ascending, smaller and pale green. The
characteristic lax, arcuate branchlets of this subspecies
also distinguish it from P. quadrifaria.
Etymology: the subspecific epithet monticola = moun-
taineer, referring to the mountainous habitat of the subspecies.
70
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 7. — P. truncata subsp.
monticola , Esterhuysen 28587.
A, flowering branch; B,
Bower clasped by bract; C,
indumentum of hypanthium
tube and glabrous abaxial sur-
faces of calyx lobes; D, fruit
in tomentum of bract; E, leaf;
F, bract. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Distribution and ecology : subspecies monticola is dis-
tributed south of 32°S latitude and between 18°E and 20°
longitude. It occurs in the Northwestern, Southwestern,
and Agulhas Plain centres of endemism (Goldblatt &
Manning 2000) of the Cape Floristic Region. It grows in
mountainous areas and is distributed from Clanwilliam,
along the Cederberg Mountains, southwards along
mountain ranges and summits to Table Mountain,
Helderberg, Kogelberg, the Hex River Mountains and
the Riviersonderend Mountains.
Plants are often found in rock crevices or in damp shel-
tered gullies. They also occur on western, southwestern
and eastern slopes and on shale bands at an altitude of
1 667-2 000 m, on Sneeukop (Goudini). The most com-
mon habitat is on mountain summits, e.g. Sneeuberg,
Slanghoek Pile, Zebra Kop, Jonaskop and Buffelshoek, as
well as on mountain peaks, e.g. Milner, Du Toits, Uitkyk
and Bailey’s Peaks, at altitudes of ± 2 000 m. Figure 8.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Ms Gill Condy for
the line drawings. Dr O.A. Feistner for translating the
diagnosis into Fatin and Ms A. Romanowski for print-
ing the photograph.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Acocks 1002 , 1004 , 3045 , 3214 (la) S; 17234 (la) K, PRE; 19397 (la)
K, M, PRE; 23678 (la) PRE. Almborn 475 (la) MO; 539 (la) M. F.
Archer 120 (la) NBG, PRE.
Barker 5751. 9217 . 10286 (la) NBG. Bayliss 577 (la) M, MO, PRE;
591. 1105, BRI-B591 (la) K, MO. PRE; BR1-B546 (la) PRE. Bellamy
2 (la) PRE. Bolus 9507 (la) BOL, K. Boucher 1983 (la) NBG; 2872
(la) K, NBG, PRE; 2880 (la) PRE; 3177 (la) C, K, NBG, PRE.
Bredenkamp 972 , 973. 977. 978. 983. 985, 986. 988-994. 1004-1011
( la) PRE. Bremer 264 ( la) PRE, S. Buchell 387 (la) PRE.
Compton 519 (la) NBG, S; 1404 (lb) NBG; 2800 (la) BOL, NBG;
3327 (la) BOL, K; 3743 (la) NBG; 4894 (la) BOL; 4901 . 5890 (la)
BOL, NBG; 6347 (lb) NBG; 6546. 6902. 9537 (la) NBG; 9970 (la)
MO, NBG; 11701. 11718 . 12237. 15020. 18781 (la) NBG; 19949 (la)
NBG, MO; 22821 (la) S; 24331 (la) NBG, MO.
Dahlgren & Peterson 257 (la) K. Davis s.n. (la) NBG. PRE, SAM.
Drege 2971 (la) K, P; s.n. (la) K.
Ecklon & Zeylier s.n. ( la) BREM, MO, S. Emdon 197 (la) C, K. PRE.
Esterhuysen 1327 (la) BOL; 1744 (lb) BOL; 2273 (la) BOL; 3638
(lb) BOL; 3703 (la) K; 7380. 8416. 9542. 9822 , 9921 (lb) BOL;
10886 (la) BOL; 11046 ( lb) BOL; 11255 (lb) BOL, K; 26859 (la) K;
27451 (lb) BOL; 28555 (lb) BOL, K; 28574. 28587, 30573. 30910
(lb) BOL; 32195 (la) MO. Evrard 9001 (la) MO. PRE, UPS.
Forrester 114, s.n. ( la) NBG.
Galpin 11209. 11210. 11218 ( la) BM, C, PRE, UPS. Gillett 397 ( la)
NBG; 4012 (la) BOL, K, PRE. Alice Godman 527 (la) BM. GoUlblatt
2757 ( la) M, NBG, PRE, S; 2802 (la) C, PRE, M, MO; 7264 (la) MO,
PRE, S. Greuter 21765 (la) PRE. Guthrie s.n. (lb) NBG.
Hanekom 943 (la) NBG. PRE; 1249 (la) K, PRE. Hardey 448. 449
(la) PRE, BM, K, M. Herb Swartzii s.n. (la) S. Herb Thunberg s.n.
(la) LIPS. Hiendhnayr s.n. (la) M. Howes 225 ( I a) K, PRE. Hugo 545.
679 (la) K, PRE. Hugo & Mauve 4 (la) K, MO, NBG, PRE.
Hutchinson 416 (la) BM, GRA. K, PRE; 834 (la) GRA. K. PRE.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
71
Johnson 519 (la) NBG. Jordaan 545 ( la) NBG.
Kerfoot K5061 (lb) NBG. Kotze 45 (la) NBG. Kruger 911 (la) NBG,
PRE: 1754 (lb) PRE.
Le Roux 2310 (la) PRE. Levyns 1232, 1335, 1370, 1377, 1808, 1941,
2165, 2382, 2415a, 4108 (la) BOL. Lewis 2730, 4061, 4062 ( la) NBG;
62671 (la) MO; SAM67057, SAM67058 (la) NBG, PRE; Lewis s.n.
(la) NBG. Linscherg s.n. (la) S. Loubser 598 (la) NBG.
Maguire 2025 (la) C, NBG. Marloth 4238 (la) K. PRE; 6626 (lb)
NBG. PRE; 6873, 6957 (la) PRE; 10668 (la) NBG; 10798, 11426,
11686, 12943 (la) PRE; 13006, 13007 (la) NBG. PRE; 13144 (la)
PRE. Merxmuller & Giess 3832 ( la) M. PRE. Metelerkamp 562, 562a
(la) BOL. Meyer 74 (la) NBG. Morley 250 (la) NBG, PRE. Museum
Botanicum Hauniense (la) C.
Nortje 77 (la) NBG.
Pappe s.n. (la) K. Pearson 5709, 6256 ( la) BOL, K; 6765 (la) K; 6773
(la) BOL; 6782 (la) K. Pearson & Pillans 5928 (la) K. Phillips 2057
(la) NBG. Pillans 7298 (la) K; 7298, 7769 ( lb) BOL; 8021 (la) BOL;
9606, 10705 (la) MO; 63799 (la) BOL, MO. PRE. Pocock 770 (la)
NBG, PRE.
Rauh 3553 (la) M. Rourke 961 ( lb) MO. NBG.
Salter 1568 ( la) K. Schlechter 10627 (la) BM. K. MO. PRE. S; 10660
(la) BM, K. PR. PRE. S. Solomon 92 ( la) NBG. Stehle 309 ( lb) NBG.
Stephens 7226. 7264 (la) K. Stirton 10148 (la) PRE. Stokoe 1460 (la)
PRE; 2520 (lb) PRE; 8040 (lb) BOL; 8041 (la) BOL; 8042 (la) BOL.
GRA, NBG. PRE; 8225 (lb) BOL; 17574 (lb) BOL. PRE; 22330 (lb)
K. PRE; 22331 (la) BOL. PRE; 64616 (lb) PRE: s.n. (la) NBG: s.n.
(lb) BOL. NBG. Stokoe & Davis s.n. (la) NBG. Story 4303 (la) K.
GRA. PRE. Strid 37832 (la) C, NBG.
Taylor 2865 (la) NBG, S; 3921 (la) PRE: 4011 (la) NBG; 6145 (lb)
PRE; 6495 (la) NBG. PRE; 8664 (la) K, NBG. PRE. S; 9293 (la)
PRE; 10483, 10618 (la) NBG. PRE. Thoday 213 (la) NBG: 1921 ( la)
BOL. Thompson 1278, 1519 (la) NBG; 2823 (la) K. MO. NBG. PRE.
Thunberg s.n. (la) S. SBT. Tyson 318 (la) NBG; 1452 (la) PRE: 2318
(la) K.
Van Breda 198 (la) PRE. Van Rooyen 2401. 2626 ( la) M. Van Rooven,
Steyn & De Villiers 618 (la) NBG. Van Son TRV36623 ( la) PRE .Van
Wyk 6485 ( la) PRE. Van Zyl 3295 (la) K. MO. PRE.
Wagener 259 ( la) NBG. Whitehead s.n. ( la) TCD.
Zeyher43 ( la) K. NBG. MO. S; s.n. ( la) M. Zietsman & Zietsman 925,
1151 (la) PRE.
REFERENCES
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1999. Structure of mucilagi-
nous epidermal cell walls in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae).
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 129: 223-238.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2000. The epidermis in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic
significance. Bothalia 30: 69-86.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001a. Leaf anatomy of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): taxonomic and ecological
significance. Bothalia 31: 53-70.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2001b. Taxonomic signifi-
cance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia 31: 213-236.
BREYNE, J. 1678. Exoticarum plantarum centuria. David-Fredericus
Rhetius, Gdansk.
BRUMMITT, R.K. 2000. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta:
50. Taxon 49: 799-808.
CAFFERTY, S. & BEYERS, J.B. 1999. Proposal to reject the name
Lachnaea congloinerata (Rhamnaceae). Taxon 48: 171, 172.
GOLDBLATT. P. & MANNING. J. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus of
the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 15-19.
GREUTER, W„ MCNEIL, J, BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M.,
DEMOULIN, V.. F1LGUEIRAS, T.S., NICOLSON, D.H.,
SILVA, PC., SKOG. J.E.. TREHANE. P„ TURLAND, N.J. &
HAWKSWORTH. D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature ( Saint Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books,
Konigstein.
HOFFMAN. T.M. 1998. Succulent Karoo Biome. In A.B. Low & A.G.
Rebelo, Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: 74.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
IUCN Species Survival Commission 1994. 1UCN Red List Categories.
IUCN. Gland. Switzerland.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Mantissa plantarum. Cramer, Weinheim.
LINNAEUS. C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum. Cramer, Weinheim.
LINNAEUS. C. 1784. Systema vegetabiliwn. Dieterich. Gottingen.
MEISNER. C.F. 1857. Ordo CLXVII. Thymelaeaceae. In A.L.P.P. de
Candolle, Prodromus systematis naturalis 14: 493-605.
Masson, Paris.
PLUKENET, L. 1700. Almagesti Botanici Mantissa. Sumptibus
autoris, London.
RAY, J. 1704. Historiae plantarum. Smith & Walford, London.
REBELO, A.G. 1998. Fynbos Biome. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo,
Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: 74.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
SAVAGE, S. 1945. A catalogue of the Linnaean Herbarium. Linnean
Society of London.
THODAY. D. 1924. XVIII. A revision of Passerina. Kew Bulletin 4:
146-168.
THUNBERG. C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman.
Upsala.
THUNBERG. C.P. 1825. Flora capensis. Cottae, Stuttgart.
W1LLDENOW. C.L. 1799. Caroli a Linne Species plantarum. Nauk,
Berlin.
WIKSTROM, J.E. 1818. Granskning af de till Thymelaearum
Vaxtordning horande Slagten och Arter. Kungliga Svenska
Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar: 265-355.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,2: 1-81. Reeve, London.
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium. Department of Botany,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
APOCYNACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF BRACHYSTELMA FROM EASTERN CAPE. SOUTH AFRICA
Brachystelma cummingii A.P.Dold, sp. nov., B.
tenellum R.A.Dyer affinis base inflata gemmae pentago-
na (non globosa); lobis interioribus coronae rectangulatis
(non anguste linearibus); lobis interioribus coronae non
appendiculatis-dentatis; corpusculo clavato (non rectan-
ulato); pagina interiori loborum trichomis sparsis acuti-
cylindricis, albis adprementibusque, in longitudinem
ordinatis (non pilis longis albisque).
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3324 (Steytlerville): Klein-
poort, (-BD), 550 m, 27-01-2001, Bold 4368 (GRA,
holo.).
Perennial herb with tuber. Tuber depressed, spherical,
not exposed. 20-25 mm high, ± 30 mm diam. Stems 1-3
from single central growth point, erect, occasionally
branching above ground level, below 10 mm, 0. 5-1.0 mm
72
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
simultaneously; pedicels spreading, 15-18 x 0.4 mm,
puberulous, purple. Bract persistent, single, extra axillary
clasping, lanceolate, acute, ladle-shaped, cuspidate,
bluntly spurred at base, 1 x 0.2 mm at base, green becom-
ing dark purple-black. Sepals 5, lanceolate, acute, 1 .6 x
0.6 mm at base, glabrous, reflexed below corolla sinus,
reaching pedicel, persistent, purple. Corolla : in bud,
inflated base pentagonal, 2 x 2.5 mm, cylindrical beak
4-6 x 0.5 mm, apex rounded; at anthesis, (4.5-)
5 .5— 6.0(— 10) x 3. 5-4.0 mm; tube 0.25-0.50 mm, sur-
rounding base of gynostegium, then reflexed up to 1 mm
to sinus; lobes deltoid at base, produced into long attenu-
ate lobes connivent at apices, 5-8 mm from apex to sinus,
1.2 mm broad at base, narrowing abruptly to 0.3 mm,
sinus between lobes deeply incised, forming an open,
pyramidal to ± globose, cage-like structure, inner surface
of lobes with sparse, cylindrical-acute, white, adpressed
trichomes, each attached to a raised papilla, arranged lon-
gitudinally, base dark purple, outer surface paler, upper
surfaces dull green to yellow-green. Gynostegium 1 mm
diam. at base, 1-2 mm high, glabrous, stipe white; outer
corona lobes 0.4 x 0.3 mm at base, erect, slightly spread-
ing, flattened, distal end bilobed, lobes spreading lateral-
ly forming a shallow V, black, tips sparsely furnished with
minute white trichomes; inner corona lobes 5, 0.4 x 0.2
mm at base, flattened, incumbent on and curving inwards
distally to cover anthers, black. Pollinium semi-ovate,
flattened, 0.22 x 0.12 mm, insertion crest along outer
edge narrowly, transparently winged, golden brown; cor-
pusculum clavate, 0. 15 mm long, orange-brown; caudicle
short, broad, orange-brown. Follicles paired, linear ± 60
x 3 mm, broadest in the middle, green, minutely and
densely mauve-speckled, apices forming minute club-
shaped tip. Flowering time : November to December.
Figures 9-11.
Specimens examined
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville): De Bordtjie, west of
Kleinpoort, (-BC), Bruyns 6913 (BOL); south of Kleinpoort, (-BD).
Brityns 4914 (BOL); Kleinpoort, (-BD), Camming 7037 (GRA); Dold
4368 (GRA).
Brachystelma cununingii resembles B. tenellum
R. A. Dyer (Dyer 1973, 1980, 1983), but differs morpho-
FIGURE 10. — Brachystelma citmmingii , Dold 4368, pollinariutn.
Scale bar: 100 pm.
FIGURE 9. — Brachystelma citmmingii, Dold 4368. A, flower bud; B,
flower at anthesis; C, D, corona, view from top and side. Scale
bars: 1 mm. Illustrations: A. Dold.
thick at base, 0.4-0. 5 mm thick above, 100-150 mm long,
internodes 4 mm at base to 10-14 mm above, dull purple
at base, new growth green, white puberulous. Leaves ses-
sile, basal 3 or 4 pairs elliptic, 14-20 x 3-5 mm, erect,
often twisted on central axis, margins tinged reddish,
upper 10-15 pairs linear, spreading, simple, (I0-)
1 8— 20(— 22) x 1 .0-1.5 mm, entire, V-shaped in cross sec-
tion, lower keel prominent, upper surface with minute
shiny water cells, dark green, lower surface leathery, yel-
low-green. Flowers single, extra-axillary at nodes, open-
ing successively at every node whilst growing, seldom
Bothalia 32. 1 (2002)
73
FIGURE 1 1. — Brachystelma cummingii, Dold 4368, section of corolla
lobe showing adpressed trichomes. Scale bar: 100 pm.
logically in several ways (Table 1). The recurved corolla
lobe margins of B. cummingii resemble those of B.
gracile E. A. Bruce (Bruce 1949: Dyer 1980, 1983), but
are more pronounced, obscuring all but the tips of the
calyx. The unusual adpressed trichomes on the inner sur-
face of the corolla lobes of B. cummingii are also found
on B. pygmaeum.
B. cummingii is only known from four specimens, one
from De Bordtjie and three from Kleinpoort (Figure 12),
at 550-800 m above sea level and is scattered in open
rocky grassland on Hat surfaces. The vegetation type of
both localities is Central Lower Nama-Karoo (Hoffman
1996). Tubers are well below the surface in shallow
sandy soil (derived from the Peninsula formation of the
Table Mountain geological group) associated with
Aristida adscensionis. Dicoma spinosa , Digitaria eri-
antlia , Eragrostis curvula , Euphorbia jansenvillensis and
Lebeckia pungens. An average annual rainfall (23 years)
of 350 mm has been recorded at Glenconnor, 30 km to
the east of Kleinpoort. In the absence of data, it is expect-
ed that Kleinpoort and De Bordtjie would have a similar
rainfall figure.
TABLE 1. — Morphological differences between Brachystelma cum-
mingii and B. tenellum
FIGURE 12. — Known distribution of Brachystelma cummingii.
The locality of B. cummingii is significant, as the
genus is poorly represented in arid regions (Peckover
1993) compared to areas of higher rainfall. In his revi-
sion of the genus. Dyer (1980) recorded only a single
species in the Karoo. In comparison. Retief & Herman
(1997) record 35 species for the northern provinces of
South Africa, whereas Bruyns (2000) records three
species of Brachystelma for the Cape flora, of which
only one is endemic to that region.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Rhodes University Joint Research Council is thanked for
financial support. Nancy Lawrence, Albuquerque, New
Mexico, is thanked for the Latin diagnosis. Dr Peter Bruyns
is thanked for his valuable advice on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
BRUCE, E.A. 1949. Brachystelma gracilis. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 27: t. 1077.
BRLTYNS. RV. 2000. Apocynaceae. In P. Goldblatt & J. Manning,
Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa.
Strelitzia 9: 280-290.
DYER. R.A. 1973. Brachystelma tenellum. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 42: t. 1 664.
DYER, R.A. 1980. Asclepiadaceae. Flora of southern Africa 27.4: 31.
DYER, R.A. 1983. Ceropegia, Brachystelma and Riocreuxia in south-
ern Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
HOFFMAN. T. 1996. Central Lower Nama-Karoo. In A.B. Low & A.G.
Rebelo, Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
PECKOVER. R. 1993. Taxonomic questions within the genus
Brachystelma : a few examples. Aloe 30: 114, 115.
RETIEF. E. & HERMAN. P.P.J. 1997. Plants of the northern provinces
of South Africa: keys and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6:
257-281.
A.P DOLD*
* Selmar Schonland Herbarium, P.O. Box 101, 6140 Grahamstown,
South Africa.
MS. received: 2001-04-23.
74
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
CAMPANULACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF MERCIERA FROM WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
Merciera A. DC. is one of five Campanulaceae genera
endemic to Western Cape. It is a genus of four dwarf shrub
species, occurring in sandy, rocky or clayey habitats.
Complex morphological variation render Merciera taxo-
nomically challenging at the species level. Detailed mor-
phometric analysis in Merciera (Cupido 2000) revealed
the existence of a well-defined group of specimens, which
did not match any previously recognized taxon. This
group of specimens was identified as M. brevifolia A. DC.
The first known specimen was collected by Drege during
the mid 1 820s on the Du Toitskloof Mountains and was
considered to be a member of Roella L., a genus closely
related to Merciera. Floral characters of these plants dis-
play a clear interval in the morphological variation pattern
within M. brevifolia. In addition to the distinct morpho-
logical characters, the plants also occupy a distinct geo-
graphical range, west of the Hottentots Holland Mountains
in Western Cape. All the other species in the genus occur
east of these mountains. This discrete group of specimens
is described here as a new species.
Merciera tetraloba C.N. Cupido, sp. nov., ex
affiniate M. brevifolia A. DC. et specierum affinum folia
glabra in pagina abaxiale, calyx 4 lobis et ciliatis mar-
gines, corolla alba, interdum purpureus apice, lobis 4
ovatis, stamina 4 distinguenda.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3418 (Simonstown): Strand,
Harmony Flats, Tortoise Nature Reserve, off Disa Road,
(-BB), 17 January 2000, C.N. Cupido 77 (NBG, holo.;
BM, K, MO, NY, PRE).
Subshrubs, hispidulous to hispid. Stems decumbent,
slender, branched, occasionally with groups of branches at
the end of a year’s growth. Leaves alternate, linear, less
than 8 mm long, subulate, entire, scattered, ascending, the
older spreading, sessile, glabrous on abaxial surface, mar-
gins ciliate; axillary cluster of smaller leaves present.
Inflorescence 3-flowered, I terminal, lateral 2 rudimenta-
ry, on highly reduced lateral branches with bract-like
leaves, aggregated into spike-like synflorescences towards
ends of main branches. Flowers sessile, axillary, actino-
morphic. Bract-like leaves 2, succulent, subtending each
of rudimentary flowers, absent in terminal llower, mm
long. Hypanthium obconical, 1-2 mm long, hispid with
uncinate or circinate triehomes. Calyx: lobes 4, 0.6-1. 2
mm long, fused at base to form short tube, hairs often on
hyaline tips and margins. Corolla narrowly funnel-shaped,
white, occasionally with purple tips, or very rarely pale
blue; lube 4—6 mm long; lobes 4, ovate, glabrous or hairy
on back, 2-3 mm long. Stamens 4, free, inserted at base of
corolla tube; filaments llattened, wider and pilose about
the middle, narrower towards apex, 3.0-4. 5 mm long;
anthers linear, basifixed. Ovary inferior, I -locular, con-
taining 4 erect ovules situated at base of ovary; style fili-
form, exsertcd, glabrous, swollen at base, 6-10 mm long;
stigma bifid, glabrescent, bluish purple. Fruit a hispid cap-
sule, crowned with persistent calyx, I -seeded, indehiscent.
Flowering time: November to January, flowering most
profusely in recently burnt veld (Figures 13 & 14).
Diagnostic features: the reduction in the number of calyx
lobes, corolla lobes and stamens make M. tetraloba
unique in the genus. This species differs from the other
two white-flowered species, Merciera leptoloba A. DC.
and M. brevifolia, in tetramerous flowers and calyx lobes
often with marginal hairs. Furthermore, in M. leptoloba
the corolla lobes are linear-lanceolate and the lower
leaves are more than 8 mm long, whereas in M. tetralo-
ba the corolla lobes are broadly ovate and the lower
leaves less than 8 mm long. The other species in the
genus, Merciera tenuifolia (L.f.) A. DC. and Merciera
eckloniana Buek ex Ecklon & Zeyher, differ from M.
tetraloba in having violet-blue flowers and corolla tubes
of more than 7 mm long. The species is closely related to
M. brevifolia from which it differs in floral characters
and geographical distribution. The two species occur
allopatrically. M. brevifolia is confined to mountains in
Bot River, Houwhoek and Caledon, whereas M. tetralo-
ba occurs west of the Hottentots Holland Mountains.
Distribution and habitat: this species is found in Faure,
Gordon’s Bay, Sir Dowry's Pass, Somerset West, Strand,
Dal Josaphat, Du Toitskloof and Stellenbosch (Figure
15) on flats and lower mountain slopes at altitudes
between 30 m and 350 m. It grows in open clayey soil,
often in disturbed habitats.
Farge areas of the habitat of this species in the
Helderberg and Stellenbosch areas have been destroyed
because lower mountain slopes and lowland areas are
sought after for urban development. On the Harmony
FIGURE 13.- — Merciera tetraloba. inflorescences, x 0.75. Photograph
by J.C. Manning.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
75
B , 4mm .
C-G 2mm
H i 1 mm
FIGURE 14. — Merciera tetraloba. A, portion of plant, life size: B, flowering branch; C, leaf; D, bract-like leaf with rudimentary flower; E, flower
with two bract-like leaves; F. stamen; G, base of flower longitudinally opened, showing ovary and basal part of style; H. seed. Drawn from
Cupido 77 by Inge Oliver. Scale bars: B. 4 mm; C-G. 2 mm; H, 1 mm.
Flats in Strand, the few existing populations are under
serious threat of extinction.
FIGURE 15. — Known distribution of Merciera tetraloba.
Etymology, the name of this species is derived from the
respective number of lobes in the corolla and calyx (tetra
= four, lobi - lobes).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE.— 3318 (Cape Town): Dal Josaphat, (-DB),
Barker 8865 (NBG), on hills, Tyson 899 (SAM); between Bottelary and
Stellenbosch, (-DD), Bolus BOL98256 (BOL); near roadside
Stellenbosch, Markotter 8639 (NBG); Stellenbosch Mountain, lower
western slopes above the university farm and NE of Brandwacht sub-
urb, Oliver & Oliver 11866 (NBG). 3319 (Worcester): Du Toitskloof,
(-CC), Dr'ege SAM17297 (SAM). 3418 (Simonstown): Sir Lowry’s
Pass, foot of pass, (-BB ), Adamson 4895 ( BOL); Sir Lowry’s Pass, foot
of pass on the Somerset West side. Cupido 117 (NBG); Sir Lowry’s
Pass, Guthrie 2792 (NBG); Faure Hills, Compton 10372 (NBG);
Gordon’s Bay, mountain slopes above, Bayliss 4089 (NBG); flats
between Strand and Gordon’s Bay, Jordaan s.n. (NBG); Somerset
West, Parker 3550 (NBG); Strand, upper Harmony Flats between
Lwandle Township and Strand Foam Factory, Boucher 3447 (NBG);
Strand, Tortoise Nature Reserve, Cupido 75, 77 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the following people for their assis-
tance: Prof. H.P. Linder for supervising the project;
76
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Mrs P. Runnalls of the Friends of Heidelberg Nature
Reserve for finding a population of the living plants
for me, after my own futile attempts; Ferozah Conrad
for assistance with the Latin diagnosis; the curator of
the Bolus Herbarium for making their specimens
available for the study; Mrs I. Oliver for doing the line
drawings and Dr J.C. Manning for taking the photo-
graph.
REFERENCE
CUP1DO, C.N. 2000. A re-assessment of the species boundaries in
Merciera A DC. (Campanulaceae). M.Sc. thesis (Systematics &
Biodiversity Science), University of Cape Town.
C.N. CUPIDO*
* Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7.
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2001-07-12.
ERIOSPERMACEAE
VALIDATION OF TWO SECTIONAL NAMES IN ERIOSPERMUM
Perry’s revision of Eriospermum (1994) included a new
infrageneric classification of the genus with new infra-
generic taxa being formally described. However, two of the
new sectional names were invalidly published due to the
lack of typification (Art. 37. 1 St Louis Code; Greuter et al.
2000). Although this omission was mentioned in the Index
kewensis (IK) as available in the CD-Rom version, or with-
in the International Plant Names Index (IPNI) internet data-
base, no action has been taken to validate the names.
Consequently, both names are validated here:
Eriospermum [subgenus Ligulatum| section Ligu-
latum P.LPerry ex Thiede, sect. nov. Type: Eriospermum
flagelliforme (Baker) J.C. Manning.
For the Latin diagnosis see Perry in Contributions
from the Bolus Herbarium 17: 77 (1994).
Eriospermum flagelliforme is the correct name for the
species previously known as Eriospermum abyssinicum
Baker (Manning 2000).
Eriospermum [subgenus Cyathiflorum] section
Cyathillorum P.L.Perry ex Thiede, sect. nov. Type:
Eriospermum cooperi Baker.
For the Latin diagnosis see Perry in Contributions
from the Bolus Herbarium 17: 120 (1994).
The ‘description’ of Eriospermum [subgenus Erio-
spermum] section Eriospermum P.L.Perry [in tom. cit. 160]
was superfluous under Art. 22.3 St Louis Code (Greuter
et al. 2000) and consequently not included in IK.
REFERENCES
GREUTER. W.. MCNEILL. J„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M..
DEMOULIN, V., FILGUEIRAS. T.S., NICOLSON, D.H., SILVA,
PC., SKOG, J.E., TREHANE, P„ TURLAND, N.J. &
HAWKSWORTH, D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein.
MANNING, J.C. 2000. A new combination in Eriospermum
(Convallariaceae). Bothalia 30: 157.
PERRY, PL. 1994. A revision of the genus Eriospermum (Eriosperm-
aceae). Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 17: 1-320.
J. THIEDE*
* Hamburg University, Botanical Institute, Ohnhorststr. 18, D-22609
Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: thiede@botanik.uni-hamburg.de
MS. received: 2001-09-10.
THYMELAEACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF PASSERINA FROM WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
Passerina L. comprises about 20 species and four
subspecies of evergreen perennial shrublets (Thoday
1924; Goldblatt & Manning 2000). Most members are
confined to the Cape Floristic Region with its Mediterranean
or semi-Mediterranean climate. Three species extend
northwards along the Great Escarpment, with P. monti-
vagus Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk extending north-
wards to Tanzania. Under the heading ‘Incertae’, Thoday
( 1924) discussed specimens of doubtful identity, most of
them from mountain summits and outlying localities.
He concluded that further collecting would solve the
problem of their identification. Here we describe a new
species confined to high altitudes on some of the moun-
tains in the western sector of the Cape Floristic Region
and the adjacent Roggeveld Escarpment. The separate
specific status of the new taxon is supported by evidence
derived from the epidermal structure (Bredenkamp &
Van Wyk 1999, 2000), leaf anatomy (Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk 2001a) and vegetative and floral morphology
(Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2001b).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
All collections of Passerina from 22 herbaria were
studied for taxonomy and external morphology.
Specimens of the new species were found in the follow-
ing herbaria (acronyms according to Holmgren et al.
1990): BOL, K, NBG, PRE.
For leaf anatomy, both fresh and herbarium material
were studied. Vouchers used in anatomical studies:
Bredenkamp 1044-1047; Goldblatt & Manning 8627;
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
77
Oliver 9281. Methods used in the study of leaf structure
are described in Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (1999. 2000,
2001a).
Passerina nivicola Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk ,
sp. nov., P. comosae C.H. Wright affinis sed bracteis cir-
cumscriptione late obovatis, basi cuneatis, rubrofusis in
alabastro, lamina utrinque glabra, chartacea, alis bullatis,
membranaceis, marginibus ciliatis dimidio superiore,
costa crassa, ventraliter tomentosa in apicem subacutum
extensa, caespite apicali pilorum. Hypanthium circa
ovarium extra tomentoso. Sepala tempore pollinationis
membranacea, lutea vel luteorosea; sepalis, exterioribus
apice setosis, sepalis interioribus utrinque glabris.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Ceres Dist.,
Waboomberg, 1 760 m, (-DD), 12 November 1989, E.G.H.
Oliver 9281 (PRE, holo.; NBG. iso.).
Rounded evergreen shrublets 0.3-0. 5 m high. Stems
greyish brown, younger branchlets greyish tomentose,
cork finely fissured, grey-brown. Leaves decussate,
imbricate on young branchlets, sessile, closely adpressed
to stem, cymbiform. cylindric, often slightly dilated api-
cally, linear-lanceolate, (2.5-)3.1(^4.5) x (0.5— )0.6(— 0.7 )
mm, inversely ericoid; adaxial surface concave, tomen-
tose; abaxial surface convex, glabrous; apex rounded,
with tuft of trichonres, tinged red; base sessile; margin
sometimes ciliate. Inflorescences composed of polytelic
synflorescences; main florescences as well as co-flores-
cences spicate. Bracts tinged red in bud stage, enveloping
flowers and fruits, largest after anthesis, becoming more
coriaceous and rounded at fruit set, decussate, imbricate,
cymbiform; lamina rolled, widely obovate, length x '/2
width (3. 1— )3.5 x 1 ,4(— 1 .9) mm, adaxially (inside) con-
cave, abaxially (outside) convex and glabrous, midrib
tomentose on inside, chartaceous; base cuneate; main
vein strongly developed, extending to form subacute
apex, with apical tuft of trichomes; wings glabrous, bul-
late. membranous; margin ciliate in upper half. Pedicel
very short or absent. Receptacle very short. Flora! enve-
lope petaloid. up to 5.3 mm long, membranous and yel-
low or yellow-pink during pollination, papyraceous and
turning red after pollination; hypanthium tomentose at
ovary, neck ± 1.2 mm long, tomentose on outside, often
hairy inside, articulation at neck base absent because of
lack of abscission tissue, fragmentation of neck base
caused by dehydration and torsification of tissue after
fruiting, resulting in shedding of sepals and androecium;
sepals 4, imbricate in bud, flexed in flower, outer sepals
cymbiform, abaxially setose at apex, inner sepals widely
ovate, glabrous. Corolla absent. Petaloid scales absent.
Disc absent. Androecium dimorphic diplostemonous,
arising from hypanthium at separation point of sepals; fil-
aments of antipetalous whorl ± 0.4 mm long, those of
antisepalous whorl ± 1 .2 mm long; pollen grains shed as
monads, spheroid, pantoporate, basal reticulum of typical
crotonoid pattern no longer discernible, replaced by sec-
ondary reticulum derived from fused sexine (Breden-
kamp & Van Wyk 1996). Ovary superior, ± 1.7 x 0.5 mm,
pseudomonomerous, uniloculate, with one pendulous ovule
laterally attached near top of ovary, placentation parietal;
ovule anatropous, position ventrally epitropous, bitegmic,
with exotegmic palisade, crassinucellate, obturator of
elongate cells extending from base of style to mi-cropyle;
stigma developing at base of sepals, penicillate. Fruit a 1-
seeded berry, pericarp membranous and dry, enveloped
by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthium fragmented at
neck base. Seed broadly fusiform with outgrowths at both
micropylar and funicular ends, ± 2.2 x 1.2 mm, tegmen
black and shiny; endosperm formation nuclear, but later
becoming cellular throughout. Figure 16.
Leaf anatomy
Leaf structural type A: leaf isobilateral. Main vascu-
lar bundle central; bundle sheath completely enclosing
vascular tissue. Secondary vascular bundles close, with
bundle sheaths adhering, forming a central plate of veins.
Sclerenchymatous hypodermal sheath absent. (Breden-
kamp & Van Wyk 2001a).
Leaf isobilateral, outline in transverse section (t/s)
transversely elliptic. Adaxial epidermis: cuticular mem-
brane (CM) ± 3 pm thick; periclinal x anticlinal cell
diameters in t/s 25 x 40 pm; stomata often dispersed in
FIGURE 16. — Passerina nivicola.
Oliver 9281: A, inflores-
cence; B. leaf; C, bract; D.
flower clasped by bract; E,
fruit enveloped by persistent
floral bract. Scale bars: A. D,
E, 2 mm; B. C. 1mm.
78
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 17. — Passerina nivicola . Bredenkamp 1044 : leaf structural
type A, t/s; leaf isobilateral, vascular bundles closely arranged,
bundle sheaths adhering, forming central plate of veins, ad,
adaxial epidermis; ab, abaxial epidermis; bs, bundle sheath;
mb, median vascular bundle. Scale bar: 100 pm.
two columns in adaxial epidermal folds, with ± 3-5 rows
of epidermal cells in between, sunken or arranged in
stomatal crypts. Abaxial epidermis : cuticular ornamenta-
tion comprising several domes per cell, CM ± 20 pm
thick, irregularly marked by grooves, wax platelets
scarce, geometrical, flat or raised, with rounded to sharp
edges; cells arranged in rows, oblong, pentagonal-hep-
tagonal, dimensions in surface view 45-55 x 35^40 pm,
periclinal x anticlinal cell diameter in t/s 35^40 x 40-55
pm. Mesophyll consisting of ± 3 adaxial and 4 abaxial
layers of ± homogeneous, palisade-like parenchyma cells;
density 3 or 4 cells per 50 pm; intercellular spaces sur-
rounding central veins. Main vascular bundle 41CM50
pm thick, 810-850 pm wide, widely ovate with ample
extraxylary fibres. Bundle sheath consisting of ± 19-25
parenchymatous cells, completely enclosing vascular tis-
sue, cells rounded, transversely or longitudinally elongat-
ed. Secondary vascular bundles forming central plate of 3
or 4 veins on each side of main bundle. Figure 17.
Diagnostic characters and relationships : Passerina
nivicola is superficially similar to P. comosa , but differs
from it by its glabrous leaves and red-tinged bracts,
which are glabrous outside, with bullate, membranous
wings. The flowers of the new species are membranous
and yellow or yellow-pink at pollination, with outer
sepals abaxially setose at the apex and the inner sepals
glabrous on both surfaces.
Etymology, the specific epithet is a compound of the
Latin nivalis (= pertaining to snow) and cola (= dweller),
thus nivicola = a dweller in the snow. The name alludes
to the occurrence of this species at high altitudes, where
the plants are periodically covered by snow.
Distribution and ecology, because of its confinement
to mountainous areas P. nivicola is clearly still under-col-
lected. The most northerly record is from Sneeukrans on
the Roggeveld Escarpment, where it is associated with
Escarpment Mountain Renosterveld (Rebelo 1998).
Most records are from the Ceres and Worcester Districts
(Figure 18), with plants occurring in either Mountain
Fynbos or Central Mountain Renosterveld (Rebelo
1998).
The new species was found on Waboomberg near
Ceres growing at an altitude range of 1 200-1 760 m and
although it was summer, the plants were dug out from
under a layer of snow (Figure 19). Here the plants occur
in low restioid or graminoid veld on sandy loamy soil.
They are somewhat stunted and attain a height of ± 0.3
m, possibly because of the effects of snow. The same
species is also found lower down, next to the road lead-
ing to the mountain, where the plants are more robust
and reach a height of up to 0.5 m; the floral bracts are
more coriaceous. Accessible plants are grazed by stock.
Information from Grobler 540 , indicates that this species
also occurs on shale flats at Kareevlakte in Ceres.
Conservation status : Least Concern [LC] (IUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
Specimens examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): Roggeveld Escarpment,
Quaggasfontein Farm, on road to Uitkyk, Sneeukrans W of Sutherland,
(-AB), Goldblatt & Manning 8627 (PRE).
17° 18° 19° 20° 21° 22°
FIGURE 18. — Known distribution
of P. nivicola.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
79
FIGURE 19. — Typical habitat of P. nivicola: A. rounded shrublets covered in snow on level area close to summit of Waboomberg, near Ceres; B.
individual stunted plants, ± 0.3 m high; C. plants flowering lower down mountain.
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Ceres, Kareevlakte,
(-AD), Grobler 540 (PRE); Ceres, Waboomberg, Farm Merino. (-AD),
Bredenkamp 1044-1047 (PRE); vlei N of FM tower, Cillie 9 (NBG);
level area S of beacon, Oliver 9281 (NBG. PRE); Ceres, Baviaansberg,
(-BA), Compton 8718 (NBG); Worcester Dist.. Tafelberg, (-CC),
Pillans 17159 (BOL, K), s.n. (K).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Gill Condy for the
line drawings, Otto Leistner for translating the diagnosis
into Latin and Adela Romanowski for printing the pho-
tographs.
REFERENCES
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 1996. Palynology of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): relationships, form and
function. Grand 35: 335-346.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1999. Structure of
mucilaginous epidermal cell walls in Passerina (Thyme-
laeaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 129:
223-238.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2000. The epidermis in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic
significance. Bothalia 30: 69-86.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2001a. Leaf anatomy of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): taxonomic and ecological
significance. Bothalia 31: 53-70.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001b. Taxonomic signifi-
cance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia 31: 213-236.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING. J. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus of
the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9.
HOLMGREN, K„ HOLMGREN. N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index Herbariorum. International Association for Plant
Taxonomy, New York Botanical Garden, New York.
IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION 1994. IUCN Red List
Categories. ILrCN. Gland, Switzerland.
REBELO, A.G. 1998. Fynbos Biome. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo,
Vegetation of South Africa. Lesotho and Swaziland: 62-74.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
THODAY, D. 1924. XV III. A revision of Passerina. Kew Bulletin 4:
146-168.
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany, Uni-
versity of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-08-31.
THYMELAEACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF GN1D1A FROM THE KNERSVLAKTE, WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
Gnidia pedunculata Beyers , sp. nov., Gnidia
polycephala (C.A.Mey.) Gilg similis sed ab ea peduncu-
lo plerumque longo, involucralibus bracteis coriaceis
abaxiale glabris, floribus quadrimeris squamis quarternis
camosis petaloideis differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Kners-
vlakte, Olifants River Settlement 316, near Eastern bor-
der, (-BC), 6-08-1993, Le Roux & Hilton-Taylor 27
(NBG, holo.; K, PRE).
Erect dwarf shrub up to 0.25 m tall. Branches ascend-
ing, later becoming woody, glabrous, densely leafy, later
becoming naked with prominent leaf scars. Leaves alter-
nate, ascending, densely imbricate below, becoming dis-
tant above, petiolate, glabrous; blade oblanceolate,
4. 8-7. 8 x 0. 5-1.4 mm, subfleshy, enervate, ad- and abax-
ially flat, apex obtuse or subacute; petiole 0. 3-0.4 mm
long. Inflorescence terminal, indeterminate, bracteate
umbel with up to 14 mature flowers at a time; flower
development sequential — fruiting stages present with
young buds developing within; peduncle 10-30 mm
long, glabrous. Involucral bracts 5 or 6, ovate or elliptic,
7-10 x 3-6 mm, green or green with maroon tinge, cori-
aceous, faintly nervate, adaxially shortly adpressed hairy,
abaxially glabrous, apex rounded or subacute. Flowers
subactinomorphic, yellow, strongly scented. Pedicel
1. 3-2.0 mm long, adaxially sericeous, abaxially densely
covered with short, silky, spreading hairs. Hypanthium
9.5-22.0 mm long, circumscissile 3. 5-5.0 mm from
base, upper portion narrowly funnel-shaped, covered
with short crisped hairs becoming sericeous towards
apex, basal portion narrowly ovate, densely covered with
long, silky, ascending hairs. Sepals 4, narrowly elliptic,
2. 9-3. 6 x 1.0-2. 2 mm, adaxially glabrous, abaxially
sericeous, margin recurved, apex rounded. Petaloid
scales 4, inserted at rim of hypanthium alternate to sepa-
ls, fleshy, narrowly oblong to oblong, narrowly elliptic to
80
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 20. — Gnidia pedunculata, Le Roux & Hilton-Taylor 27 (NBG). A. portion of plant, x 1 ; B, leaf, abaxial view and c/s; C, involucral bract,
abaxial view. D. E, flower: D. side view, circumscission zone arrowed; E, 1/s above circumscission zone with gynoecium removed. F,
gynoecium and stigma enlarged. Scale bars: B-F, 2 mm.
elliptic, obovate or spathulate, 0.9-1. 6 x 0.5-0. 6 mm,
apex rounded or obtuse, glabrous. Stamens 4 + 4, sub-
sessile; outer whorl semi-exserted, inserted just below
rim of hypanthium; inner whorl included, inserted a short
way down throat of hypanthium; filament 0.1 -0.2 mm
long; anthers introrse, ellipsoid, 0.5-0. 9 x 0.3-0. 5.
Ovary narrowly ellipsoid, attenuated at base, 1.6-3. 6 x
0.5-0. 9 mm, glabrous, unilocular with single, pendulous
ovule; style filiform, inserted laterally on ovary, includ-
ed, 4. 8-5.0 mm long, glabrous; stigma penicillate. Fruit
an achene, enclosed in persistent base of hypanthium.
Flowering time'. August. Figure 20.
This species at first glance appears similar to Gnidia
polycephala (C.A.Mey.) Gilg which also has alternate
leaves, a terminal, indeterminate, bracteate umbel with
involucral leaves much broader than the cauline leaves
and yellow sericeous flowers. It, however, differs from
G. polycephala by the usually well-developed peduncle,
the coriaceous involucral bracts which are glabrous
abaxially and the four-merous flowers with four, fleshy,
petaloid scales. In G. polycephala there is no well-devel-
oped, naked peduncular region, the papery thin involu-
cral bracts are adpressed hairy abaxially, the flower is
pentamerous and the petaloid scales are absent.
Gnidia pedunculata has only been recorded from the
Knersvlakte north of Vredendal, growing in Succulent
Karoo vegetation in well-drained, sandy, loam soil.
Figure 21.
FIGURE 21. — Geographical distribution of Gnidia pedunculata.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
81
The usually well-developed, naked peduncles in this
species prompted the specific epithet which is derived
from the Latin, pedunculatus.
Parcitype material
WESTERN CAPE.— 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Knersvlakte,
Moedverloor. near river on steep slope, (-AD), 31-08-2001 . Schmiedel
118546 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr Ted Oliver for the Latin diag-
nosis and Mrs Inge Oliver for the line drawings.
J.B.P. BEYERS*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2001-12-04.
LAMIACEAE
NEW COMBINATIONS IN THE GENUS ROTHECA IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
The genus Clerodendrum L. was divided into a num-
ber of different sections or subgenera by Gtirke (1895),
Pearson (1912) and Thomas ( 1936) on the basis of inter
alia the flower symmetry. In the past, some of these sec-
tions or subgenera were considered to be independent
genera, e.g. the genus Cyclonema Hochst. (1842). Steane
et al. (1997) showed that Clerodendrum sens. lat. is
polyphyletic and that Cyclonema should be reinstated as
a genus. Steane & Mabberley (1998) revived the genus
Rotheca Raf. for taxa under the subgenus Cyclonema
(Hochst.) Thomas and/or sections Cyclonema (Hochst.)
Giirke and Konocalyx Verde, of the genus Clerodendrum
on the grounds of the corolla (flower) symmetry, anther
attachment and stigma symmetry. More new combina-
tions for taxa from the Flora zambesiaca and Conspectus
florae angolensis areas were made by Fernandes &
Verdcourt (2000).
A number of new combinations for taxa occurring in
southern Africa, not covered by the above-mentioned
publications, are presented here:
Rotheca caerulea ( N.E.Br .) P.PJ. Herman &
Retief comb. nov.
Clerodendrum caeruleum N.E.Br. in Kew Bulletin 1895: 115
(1895). Type: [KwaZulu-JNatal, Mooi River Valley, Gerrard 1252 (K).
Rotheca cuneiformis ( Moldenke ) P.P.J. Herman &
Retief, comb. nov.
Clerodendrum cuneiforme Moldenke in Phytologia 59: 1 19 (1986).
C. cuneatum Giirke: 303 (1900), nom. illeg., non Turcz.: 221 (1863).
Type: Transvaal [Mpumalanga], Lydenburg, Wilms 160 (?B).
C. scheffleri Giirke var. ellipticum Moldenke: 417 (1940). Type:
[KwaZulu-]Natal, Durban, Evans 544a (NH).
Rotheca louwalbertsii (P.P.J .Herman) P.P.J. Herman
& Retief, comb. nov.
Clerodendrum louwalbertsii P.P.J.Herman in Bothalia 25: 100
(1995). Type: Transvaal [Northern Province], between Nylstroom and
Warmbaths, Germishuizen 3343 (PRE, holo.!).
Rotheca pilosa (H. Pearson) P.P.J.Herman &
Retief, comb. nov.
Clerodendrum pilosum H. Pearson in Transactions of the South
African Philosophical Society 15: 181 (1905). Type: [Eastern Cape],
Kentani, Pegler 164 (PRE!).
Rotheca uncinata ( Schinz ) P.P.J.Herman &
Retief, comb. nov.
Clerodendrum uncinatum Schinz in Verhandlungen des
Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg 31: 206 (1889).
Kalaharia uncinata (Schinz) Moldenke: 132 ( 1955). Type: South West
Africa [Namibia], Goroxas, Scliinz 1890 (?Z).
C. spinescens (Oliv.) Giirke: 180 (1893), nom. illeg.
REFERENCES
BROWN, N.E. 1895. Plantarum novarum in herbario horti regii con-
servatarum. Decades XV-XIX. Kew Bulletin 1895: 102-120.
FERNANDES. R.B. & VERDCOURT. B. 2000. Rotheca (Labiatae)
revived — more new combinations. Kew Bulletin 55: 147-154.
GURKE, M. 1893. Verbenaceae africanae. Botanische Jahrbucher 18:
165-183.
GURKE, M. 1895. Verbenaceae. In A. Engler, Die Pflanzenwelt Ost-
Afrikas, Theil C: 337-342. Dietrich Reimer. Berlin.
GURKE. M. 1900. Verbenaceae africanae. II. Clerodendron L. Bota-
nische Jahrbucher 28: 291-305.
HERMAN, P.P.J. 1995. Verbenaceae. A new species in the genus
Clerodendrum. Bothalia 25: 100-102.
HOCHSTETTER, C.F. 1842. Nova genera plantarum Africae turn aus-
tralis turn tropicae borealis proponit et describit. Verbenaceae.
Flora 25: 225-228.
MOLDENKE. H.N. 1940. Novelties in the Avicenniaceae and
Verbenaceae. Phytologia 1: 409^-19.
MOLDENKE. H.N. 1955. Notes on new and noteworthy plants. XIX.
Phytologia 5: 132-134.
MOLDENKE, H.N. 1986. Notes on the genus Clerodendrum
(Verbenaceae) XII. Phytologia 59: 99-126.
PEARSON, H.H.W. 1905. South African Verbenaceae. Transactions of
the South African Philosophical Society 15: 175-182.
PEARSON. H.H.W. 1912. Verbenaceae. Flora capensis 5,1: 180-226.
SCHINZ, H. 1889. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Flora von Deutsch-
Siidwest-Afrika und der angrenzenden Gebiete. Verhandlungen
des Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg 31: 206,
207.
STEANE, D A. & MABBERLEY, D.J. 1998. Rotheca (Lamiaceae)
revived. Novon 8: 204—206.
STEANE. D.A., SCOTLAND, R.W.. MABBERLEY, D.J..
WAGSTAFF, S.J.. REEVES. PA. & OLMSTEAD. R.G. 1997.
Phylogenetic relationships of Clerodendrum s.l. (Lamiaceae)
inferred from chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany 22:
229-243.
THOMAS, B. 1936. Die Gattung Clerodendrum in Afrika. Botanische
Jahrbucher 68: 1-106.
TURCZANINOW, N.S. 1863. Verbenaceae et Myoporaceae nonnullae
hucusque indescriptae. Mosquae. Bulletin de la Societe des
Naturalistes de Moscou. Section Biologique 36: 221.
P.P.J. HERMAN* and E. RETIEF*
* National Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-05-21.
82
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
MARSILEACEAE-PTEROPSIDA
FIRST REPORT OF THE GENUS P1LULARIA FROM CONTINENTAL AFRICA
Pilularia L. is a genus of five poorly defined species.
Two species, P. globulifera L. and P. minuta A.Braun
have a European distribution, whereas P americana
A.Braun (inch P. mandoni A.Braun) occurs in North and
South America. One species each occurs in Australia (P.
novae-hollandiae A.Braun) and New Zealand (P. novae-
zelandiae Kirk). Hitherto no taxa belonging to the genus
have been recorded for the African continent.
Recently, however, I collected a species of Pilularia
in Northern Cape, South Africa. An assessment of P.
americana , P novae-hollandiae and P. novae-zelandiae
by Large & Braggins (1989) shows that these species all
have four locules in each sporocarp, rather than the two
locules per sporocatp recorded for the European taxa.
Due to a lack of suitable characters and the large overlap
in diagnostic features between these species, Large &
Braggins (1989) concluded that some of the names might
have to be placed in synonymy.
A study of the South African specimen showed that it
also has four locules in each sporocarp, thus making it
part of the P. americana group of species. Other congru-
ent features the South African specimen has with the P.
americana group of species include frond length, pedicel
length, sporocarp size, and number of megasporangia per
locule, micro- and megasporangia size as well as epi-
spore ornamentation. For this reason the oldest valid
name for the taxon, P. americana , is tentatively applied
to the South African Pilularia species.
Pilularia americana A.Braun in Monatsberichte
der Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin
15: 435 (1864). Type: North America, Fort Smith, on the
Arkansas River, Thomas Nutt all s.n. (Holotype not locat-
ed; NY, iso.).
Plants terrestrial. Rhizome with single unbranched
stele, creeping, irregularly branched, up to 0.5 mm diam.,
set with single root or root clusters at nodes, roots
unbranched, internodes up to 11 mm long, initially
sparsely haired, glabrous with age, mostly with a few
hairs at frond base, hairs up to 5 cells long, laterally
attached. Fronds with single unbranched stele, borne
singly at nodes, erect, simple, terete, up to 19 mm long,
basally with few laterally attached, 2-celled hairs,
glabrous higher up; stomata of aperigenous type,
(34.0— )39.23(— 44.0) pm long. Sporocarp globose, up to
2.5 mm diam., laterally attached, 4-locular, densely
haired, hairs up to 5 cells long, epigeal at maturity; vena-
tion catadromous, pinnately branched, each locule has 3-
veined vascular supply, central vein bearing a sorus near
branching point containing micro- and megasporangia;
veins free or anastomose at distal end of sporocarp;
sporocarp pedicel arises at node on rhizome, with single
unbranched stele, up to 2 mm long, initially growing
downwards, twisted and burying sporocarps in substrate.
Microsporangia clavate, several per sorus, wall one cell
layer thick, hyaline, each bearing 23-32 microspores.
Microspores trilete, spherical in polar view, asymmetric
in lateral view, laesura straight or curved, perispore hya-
FIGURE 22. — Pilularia americana
A.Braun. A, habit: A,, rhi-
zome; Ai, frond; Ai, sporo-
carp and cluster of roots. B,
lamina hair; C, sporocarp
hair; D, sporocarp venation
showing position of sori.
Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B. 0.1
mm; C, 0.5 mm; D, not to
scale. Drawn by J.P. Roux.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
83
FIGURE 23. — Distribution of Pilularia americana in southern Africa.
line, larger than spore, epispore thicker on distal face,
densely and finely rugulate, exospore (32.0-)34.87(-36.0)
pm diam. Megasporangia globose, wall one cell layer
thick, hyaline, 8-17 per sorus, each bearing a single
megaspore. Megaspores globose in polar and lateral
view, with prominent ridged papilla up to 104 pm long,
perispore hyaline, much larger than megaspore, epispore
thicker around papilla and at distal pole than at equator,
finely and deeply folded giving it a finely rugulate appear-
ance, exospore up to 360 pm diam. Figure 22A-D.
Specimen examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Nieuwoudtville, in season-
al pan. (-AC), 10 October 2001. J.P. Roux 3156 (NBG).
Distribution and ecology
Pilularia americana was recorded from the edge of a
seasonal pan on the Bokkeveld Escarpment, an area of
low rainfall (500-650 mm per annum) which occurs dur-
ing winter and spring (June-September) (Figure 23).
Sandstone beds of the Cape System are the dominant
geological formation in the region and support fynbos
vegetation.
Until a thorough study of the distribution of the species
and population size has been done, its conservation status
should be considered as data-deficient (IUCN 1994).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks to Dr J.T. Mickel who verified the pres-
ence of the isotype in the New York herbarium.
REFERENCES
BRAUN, A. 1864. Uber Marsilea und Pilularia. Monatsberichte der
Konielichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 15:
434-436.
IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION. 1994. IUCN Red List
Categories. IUCN Gland. Switzerland.
LARGE. M.F. & BRAGGINS, J.E. 1989. An assessment of characters
of taxonomic significance in the genus Pilularia (Mar-
sileaceae): with particuar reference to P. americana , P. novae -
hollandiae , and P. novae-zelandiae. New Zealand Journal of
Botany 27: 481^186.
J.P ROUX*
* Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2001-12-07.
Bothalia 32.1: 85-89(2002)
The taxonomic significance of trichome type and distribution in
Melolobium (Fabaceae)
A. MOTEETEE* B-E. VAN WYK* and P.M. TILNEY*
Keywords: Fabaceae, Melolobium Eckl. & Zeyh., sessile glands, stalked glands, trichomes, uniseriate hairs
ABSTRACT
All species of Melolobium Eckl. & Zeyh. were examined for epidermal features and particularly the glands which are a
distinctive feature amongst the southern African Genisteae. For comparative purposes, three species of Argyrolobium Eckl.
& Zeyh.. all five species of Dichilus DC. and five species of Polhillia C.H. Stilt, were also examined for trichome type and
distribution. Three trichome types are recognized in Melolobium. Trichome type and distribution provide an important
insight into taxonomic relations at species level in Melolobium and sometimes even allow a distinction between regional
forms. The distribution of glands (sessile and stalked) is of considerable diagnostic value in identifying species of
Melolobium. A key to all the species of the genus based mainly on type and distribution of trichomes, is presented.
INTRODUCTION
Melolobium Eckl. & Zeyh. is a papilionoid legume
genus restricted to southern Africa. Although about 20
species have been described, we recognize only 15 of
them (a complete synonymy will be published else-
where). The genus consists of small shrubs or perennial
herbs, characterized by their usually spiny habit, auricu-
late stipules and bilabiate calyces. Some species have
glandular trichomes, referred to as glandular papillae by
Gibbs (1967), glandular tubercles by Polhill (1976) and
stipitate glands by Harvey (1862). Glands are also char-
acteristic of the Mediterranean genus Adenocarpus DC.
Melolobium and related genera were originally placed in
the tribe Genisteae (Harvey 1862), then transferred to
Crotalarieae (Bentham 1865; Polhill 1976, 1981), and
finally moved back to Genisteae by Van Wyk & Schutte
(1995), where they are now firmly placed.
In the latest available revision of the genus, Harvey
(1862) used hairs and glands as diagnostic characters,
but the full extent of the variation, especially at micro-
scopic level, has not yet been studied. The aims of this
study were: to determine the taxonomic potential of epi-
dermal features in Melolobium (at both species and
generic levels); to record the microscopic structure of
hairs and glands in this genus; and to determine the
homology of glands in Melolobium and Adenocarpus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Hair type and distribution were investigated in all 1 5
of the species of Melolobium that we recognize, as well
as in three species of Argyrolobium Eckl. & Zeyh., all
five species of Dichilus DC. and five of the seven species
of Polhillia C.H.Stirt. A list of voucher specimens of all
species of Melolobium and the related African genistoid
genera used in this study is given in Table 1. For light
microscope studies, material taken from formalin: acetic
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, RO. Box 524,
2006 Auckland Park, Johannesburg.
MS. received: 2001-04-12.
acid: alcohol (FAA) and herbarium specimens was
embedded in glycol methacrylate (GMA) according to a
modification of the method of Feder & O'Brien (1968).
This modification involves infiltrating the material for a
minimum of 24 hours between the first two changes and
for a longer period (usually at least five days) before
placing in the gelatine capsules, which are then heated in
the oven at 60° C for 24 hours to polymerize. A Porter
Blum MT-1 ultramicrotome was used for sectioning and
the sections were stained according to the periodic acid-
Schiff/Toluidine Blue (PAS/TB) staining method. For
epidermal peels, pieces of leaves were treated according
to the method of Ram & Nayar (1974). To study tri-
chome distribution, several specimens of each taxon
were examined with a stereomicroscope. For SEM stud-
ies of trichomes, herbarium or washed, air-dried FAA
material was used and at least two specimens of each
taxon were examined using a JEOL JSM 5600 scanning
electron microscope.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Trichome type
Trichome type and distribution in Melolobium and
related African genera are summarized in Table 2. Three
trichome types were recognized in Melolobium'. uniseri-
ate hairs with a long narrow terminal cell and two or
three short basal cells (Figure 1A, B, D, E); stalked
glands with a unicellular head and a multicellular stalk
(Figures 2A-D; 4C); and sessile glands (Figure 3). Uni-
seriate hairs occur in all species of Melolobium [except
in M. exudans Harv. and M. lampolobum (E.Mey.)
A.Moteetee & B.-E.van Wyk which are glabrous],
Dichilus and in all the examined species of Argyrolobium
and Polhillia. The two types of glands are found only in
Melolobium.
In the subfamily Papilionoideae, uniseriate hairs con-
sist of three cells: a frequently enlarged epidermal cell,
serving as a basal cell; a short stalk cell, which occa-
sionally has special contents and is suberized; and an
elongated terminal cell (Solereder 1908). In Melolobium ,
86
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
TABLE 1. — Voucher specimens of Argyrolobium, Dichilus, Melolobium and Polhillia examined for trichome characters
Taxon Voucher
Melolobiwn
adenodes Eckl. & Zeyh.
alpinum Eckl. & Zeyh.
aethiopicum (L.) Druce
calycinum Benth.
candicans Eckl. & Zeyh.
canescens Benth.
exudans Harv.
humile Eckl. & Zeyh.
lampolobum (E.Mey.) A.Moteetee & B.-E.van Wyk
macrocalyx Dummer
microphyllum (L.f.) Eckl. & Zeyh.
obcordatum Harv.
stipulatwn Harv.
subspicatum Conrath
wilmsii Harms
Dean 756* (JRAU); Van Wyk 3070, 4036 ( JRAU)
Moteetee & Van Wvk 5 (JRAU); Sclmtte 158*, 332 (JRAU)
Van Wyk 2452*, 2685*, 4040 (JRAU)
Moteetee 10 (JRAU); Schutte 349* (JRAU); Thome 54470 (SAM)
Rourke 1739 (PRE); Schutte 499 (JRAU); Schutte 252 (JRAU)
Dean 648 (JRAU); De Castro 126* (JRAU); Van Wvk 3058* (JRAU)
Van Wyk 2468, 2692, 2702* (JRAU)
Powrie 648 (PRE); Van Wyk 2351, 2543* (JRAU)
Marshall 234 (JRAU); Van Wyk 2143 (JRAU); M. van Wyk 1081* (PRE)
Basson 105* (PRE); Moteetee 8 (JRAU); Van Wyk 3061 (JRAU)
Bredenkamp 1121 (PRE); Bolus 37 (BOL); De Winter 2601 (NBG);
Moteetee & Van Wyk 3 (JRAU)
Moteetee & Van Wyk 4 (JRAU); Schutte 147*, 394* (JRAU)
Van Wyk 2239, 2562*, 4037 (JRAU)
Moteetee & Van Wyk 2 (JRAU); Schutte 108* (JRAU); Van Wyk 1779 (JRAU)
Moteetee & Van Wyk 1 (JRAL1). Schutte 402*, Van Wyk 2624* (JRAU)
Adenocarpus
mannii Hook.f.
Teixeira & Andrade 4665 (PRE)
Argyrolobium
frutescens Burtt Davy
lanceolatum Eckl. & Zeyh.
megarrhizum Bolus
Van Wyk 1858, 2815* (JRAU)
Schutte 469*: Van Wvk 2080, 2087 (JRAU)
Van W\’k 2923, 3611 (JRAU)
Dichilus
gracilis Eckl. & Zeyh.
lebeckioides* DC.
pilosus * Conrath ex Schinz
reflexus* (N.E.Br.) A. L. Schutte
strictus E.Mey.
Polhillia
brevicalyx* (C.H.Stirt.) B.-E.van Wyk & A. L. Schutte
canescens C.H.Stirt.
involucrata* (Thunb.) B.-E.van Wyk & A. L. Schutte
obsoleta* (Harv.) B.-E.van Wyk
pollens C.H.Stirt.
Schutte 227, 241 (JRAU); M. van Wyk 2501* (JRAU)
De Castro 128 (JRAU); Schutte 118 (JRAU); Van Wvk 1538 (JRAU)
De Castro 115 (JRAU): Schutte 95. 127 (JRAU)
Sclmtte 183, 188 (JRAU); Stirton 11795 (JRAU)
Schutte 150*. 155 (JRAU); Van W\’k 1553 (JRAU)
Sclmtte 388 (JRAU); Van Wyk 2104, 2134 (JRAU)
Van Wyk 2094, 2092 (JRAU)
Schutte 398 (JRAU); M. Steenkamp sub Schutte 379 (JRAU)
Van Wyk 214, 2701 (JRAU)
Van Wyk 2095, 2129*. 2708 (JRAU)
* Species and specimens used only for SEM studies.
however, some hairs have one basal cell, whereas others
have two. In the latter case, the basal cell appears to have
divided periclinally (Figure IB). The basal cells are
structurally similar to other epidermal cells and the stalk
cell is very thick-walled (Figure IB). In Argyrolobium,
Dichilus and Polhillia on the other hand, there is always
one basal cell, which like the other epidermal cells, is
papillate (Figure 1C). In this case the stalk cell is also
markedly thickened. According to Solereder (1908) the
terminal cell is often uniformly or spirally thickened,
with verrucose or peg-shaped irregularities on the sur-
face. Scanning electron microscopy shows that in the
examined species there are two types of surface sculp-
turing of the terminal cell: striated and verrucose. In all
species of Melolobium, hairs have striated surfaces
(Figure 4A), whereas in all species of Dichilus they are
verrucose (Figure 4B). In Argyrolobium and Polhillia,
both striated and verrucose hairs are present (Schutte 1988).
Stalked glands and sessile glands occur only in
Melolobium species and not in any of the other genera.
Structural details of these two types of glands are record-
ed and illustrated for the first time. Stalked glands have
a spherical, unicellular head and a multicellular stalk
consisting of several elongated cells (Figure 2A-D).
According to Solereder ( 1908), the glands in Melolobium
are unicellular and consist of a short globular head.
Polhill ( 1976) likened them to those found in Adenocar-
pus, but Solereder (1908) described the glands of
Adenocarpus as ‘multicellular glandular shaggy hairs,
columnar in shape and broadened in a capitate manner at
their apex'. Gibbs (1967) referred to Adenocarpus glands
as glandular papillae arising ‘as outgrowths of columnar-
shaped epidermal cells'. Examination of these glands,
however, shows that they are neither shaggy hairs nor
papillae, but rather multicellular glands (Figure 2E) with
broad capitate apices unlike the unicellular-headed and
narrow-stalked glands of Melolobium.
Sessile glands (Figure 3) are not visible to the naked
eye and are barely visible under the dissecting micro-
scope. Some species such as M. alpinum Eckl. & Zeyh.
and M. candicans (E.Mey.) Eckl. & Zeyh. have previ-
ously been described as non-glandular (Harvey 1862),
possibly because these minute glands were not detected.
Stalked glands and sessile glands never co-occur, but
may be found on different parts of the same plant. For
example, two species with sessile glands on their leaves,
M. exudans and M. stipulation Harv., also have stalked
ones on their calyces and pods.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
87
TABLE 2. — Epidermal features of Argyrolobium, Dichilus, Melolo-
biuin and Polhillia
FIGURE 2. — LM photographs of stalked glands: A, Melolobium
adenodes, Van Wyk 3070, 1/s; B, M. obcordatum, Moteetee & Van
Wyk 4, 1/s. C. D, M. adenodes, Van Wyk 4036: C, 1/s; D. surface
view. E, Adenocarpus mannii Hook.f., Teixeira & Andrade
4665 , 1/s multicellular glands. Scale bars: A-D, 25 pm; E, 75 pm.
FIGURE 1. — LM photographs of uniseriate hairs: A, Melolobium
aethiopicum. Van Wyk 4036, 1/s with one basal cell; B. M.
calycinum , Moteetee 10, 1/s with two basal cells; C, Argyrolo-
bium megarrhizum Bolus, Van Wyk 3611, 1/s with papillate
basal cells; D, M. aethiopicum. Van Wyk 4040, surface view,
with some of terminal cells broken off; E, M. microphyllum,
Moteetee & Van Wyk 3, surface view. Scale bars; 10 pm.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 3. — LM photographs of 1/s
of sessile glands: A, Melolo-
bium alpinum, Schutte 332:
B. glandular form of M. can-
dicans, Schutte 499. Scale bars:
A, B, 5 pm.
The co-occurrence of • structures is generally indica-
tive of non-homology. Since stalked and sessile glands
never co-occur in Melolobium, a sessile gland may be a
stalked gland in which development was merely arrested
at the unicellular stage. Sessile and stalked glands have
diagnostically different distributions at the species level
with no variation at all within species. Hairs, on the other
hand, are more variable in distribution and can be used to
distinguish between different populations within some of
the species.
The function of glandular trichomes in Melolobium is
not yet clear, but many species are viscid. Examination
of epidermal peels of the leaves revealed the heads of the
glands to have dense protoplasts (Figures 2A, B, D; 3),
further suggesting that these structures might be secre-
tory in nature. In Adenocarpus, ‘the inner cells of the
glands break down at maturity to produce a viscous
secretion' (Gibbs 1967). Glandular trichomes are known
to secrete a large number of different substances, includ-
ing water, salt, nectar, mucilage, terpenes and digestive
enzymes (Esau 1977). Studies are being carried out to
determine the chemical nature of the contents of these
glands.
Hair distribution
In Melolobium the distribution of hairs on the leaflet
blade varies greatly, even within a species, but is highly
consistent within various forms or provenances. For
example, in the ‘typical' form of M. humile Eckl. &
Zeyh., hairs occur on all parts of the lamina, whereas in
the ‘Malmesbury’ form they occur only on the adaxial
midrib and are rare or absent on other parts. Hairs are
most commonly present on the leaflet margins and abax-
ial midrib, with the exception of M. adenodes Eckl. &
Zeyh. and some forms of M. microphyllum (L.f.) Eckl. &
Zeyh. where they are absent. In general, hairs are less
frequent on the adaxial surface than on the abaxial one.
Hairs can be used to distinguish many of the species of
Melolobium. M. adenodes is allied to M. humile (both
glandular), for example, but the former is subglabrous
and the latter is densely hairy. M. aethiopicum (L.) Druce
superficially resembles M. alpinum, but leaves of the for-
mer are hairy on both surfaces, whereas the latter is only
sparsely hairy on the upper surface. In all species of
Melolobium, glands (whether stalked or sessile) and
hairs co-occur. The distribution of hairs is not correlated
with the type of glands.
CONCLUSIONS
The type and distribution of glands is of diagnostic
significance at the generic level in African Genisteae and
at the species level within Melolobium. The type and dis-
tribution of hairs is of taxonomic value at both species
and population (provenance) levels. Within the Genis-
teae, the microscopic structure of hairs and glands is
unique in Melolobium. The glands in Melolobium and
Adenocarpus are not homologous.
Key to species of Melolobium based on trichome type
and distribution
la Stalked glands present:
2a Stalked glands on calyces only:
3a Plants unarmed:
4a Plants hairy M. stipulation
4b Plants almost glabrous M. exudans
FIGURE 4. — SEM micrographs: A,
striated hair surface in Melo-
lobium calycinum, Thome
54470 ; B, verrucose hair sur-
face in Dichilus gracilis
Eckl. & Zeyh., Schutte 241:
C, M. humile, Van Wyk 2351.
stalked glands. Scale bars: A,
B, 2 pm; C, 100 pm.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
89
3b Plants spiny:
5a Pods straight M. candicans*
5b Pods falcate M. canescens* (E.Mey. ) Benth.
2b Stalked glands on stems, leaves and calyces:
6a Plants glabrous or subglabrous M. adenodes
6b Plants sparsely to densely hairy:
7a Plants unarmed or slightly spinescent:
8a Leaflets distinctly obcordate, apex sharply emar-
ginate: bracts obliquely lanceolate to ovate ....
M. obcordatum Harv.
8b Leaflets obovate-oblong. apex mucronate; bracts
cordate to suborbicular M. luimile
7b Plants distinctly spiny M. microphyllum
lb Stalked glands absent:
9a Sessile glands present, at least on calyces (visible under 20 x
magnification):
10a Plants distinctly spiny:
11a Stems and pods subglabrous, the latter distinctly
shiny M. lampolobum
lib Stems and pods usually densely hairy, velutinous:
12a Pods straight M. candicans
12b Pods falcate M. canescens
10b Plants unarmed:
13a Sessile glands on leaves and calyces M. alpinum
13b Sessile glands on calyces only:
14a Stipules present M. wilmsii Harms.
14b Stipules absent M. subspicatum Conrath
9b Sessile glands absent:
15a Plants distinctly spiny M. calycinum Benth.
1 5b Plants unarmed:
16a Leaves and calyces densely silky: pods short, scarce-
ly exceeding calyx M. macrocalyx Dummer
16b Leaves and calyces pubescent; pods several times
longer than calyx M. aethiopicum
* Some forms of M. candicans and M. canescens are glandular as in M.
microphyllum. Since there is no strong geographical pattern in the dis-
tribution of glandular forms of M. candicans and M. canescens, we
suspect there is hybridization/ introgression between M. microphyllum
and these two species
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The curators of the cited herbaria (NBG. PRE, SAM)
are thanked for the loan of specimens. Financial assis-
tance from the Government of Lesotho and the National
Research Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. We
appreciate the assistance of Cassim Petker (RAU
Photographic Department).
REFERENCES
BENTHAM. G. 1865. Leguminosae. In G. Bentham & J.D. Hooker.
Genera plantarum 1: 434-600. Reeve, London.
ESAU. K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants, edn 2. Wiley, New York.
FEDER. N. & O'BRIEN, T.P 1968. Plant microtechnique: some prin-
ciples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55:
123-142.
GIBBS. PE. 1967. A revision of the genus Adenocarpus. Boletim da
Sociedade Broteriana, ser. 2, 41: 67-121.
HARVEY, W.H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder,
Flora capensis 2: 77-81. Hodges Smith, Dublin.
POLHILL, R.M. 1976. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. and related tribes
(Leguminosae). Botanical Systematics 1: 143-368.
POLHILL. R.M. 1981. Tribe 29. Crotalaneae (Benth.) Hutch. In R. M.
Polhill & P. H. Raven, Advances in legume systematics 1:
399-402. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.
RAM. H.Y.M. & NAYYAR. V.L. 1974. A rapid method of obtaining
epidermal peels in plants by treatment with cupric sulphate and
hydrochloric acid. Stain Technology 49: 114-116.
SCHUTTE. A.L. 1988. 'n Taksonomiese studie van die genus Dichilus
DC. ( Fabaceae-Crotalarieae ). M.Sc. thesis. Rand Afrikaans
University. Johannesburg. Unpublished.
SOLEREDER, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons, Vols
1 & 2 (English translation by Boodle & Fritsch). Clarendon
Press, Oxford.
VAN WYK. B-E. & SCHUTTE A.L. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships
in the tribes Podalyrieae. Liparieae and Crotalarieae. In M.D.
Crisp & J.J. Doyle, Advances in legume systematics 7: 283-308.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Bothalia 32,1:91-96 (2002)
Pollen morphology and biometry of the genus Androcymbium
(Colchicaceae) in southern Africa: taxonomic and biogeographic
considerations
N. MEMBRIVES*, J. MARTIN**, J. CAUJAPE-CASTELLS*** and J. PEDROLA-MONFORTf
Keywords: Androcymbium Willd., biogeography. Colchicaceae, pollen biometry, pollen morphology, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Pollen characters in 16 southern African type specimens of Androcymbium Willd. that represent the three sections into
which the genus is presently divided ( Androcymbium , Dregeocymbium and Erythrostictus ), were examined to assess the
possibility of sectional characterization based on pollen traits and to explore the relationship between pollen traits and geo-
graphic species distribution. Differences in pollen grain size, shape, number of apertures and exine pattern, were observed.
Principal Component Analysis, using both qualitative and biometric pollen characters, distinguished four groups of species
with four different pollen types. Most of the species have a microreticulate exine pattern with either diaperturate or tria-
perturate grains. The remaining species have either a rugulate exine pattern with diaperturate grains, or a rugulate-reticu-
late exine pattern with thickened (hypertrophied) muri with diaperturate grains. While section Dregeocymbium can be well
delimited by the unique thickened muri. and by a significantly larger grain size, no diagnostic pollen traits were found for
sections Androcymbium and Erythrostictus. Similarly, although the six northern African species exhibit a microreticulate
exine pattern, the high variability observed for this trait in their southern African counterparts, does not follow a geographic
pattern.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Androcymbium Willd. (Colchicaceae) com-
prises ± 50 species (Miiller-Doblies & Miiller-Doblies
1984. 1990. 1998; Arnold & De Wet 1993; Pedrola-
Monfort et al. 1999a, b, in press) whose distribution
(Figure 1 ) embraces arid areas in western southern Africa
(with about 35 species), eastern southern Africa (with six
species), northern southern Africa and eastern Africa
(with two species), the Mediterranean area (with four
species) and the Canary Islands (with two species).
Androcymbium is the only member of the tribe
Colchiceae together with Colchicum L. sensu into (i.e.
including Bulbocodium L., Merendera Ram. and
Synsiphon Regel). At present, the genus is divided into
three sections based on tepal blade morphology ( Krause
1921): section Androcymbium , characterized by green,
curved, winged tepal blades, with representatives
throughout southern Africa; section Dregeocymbium ,
possessing Hat, unwinged tepals and very short stamens
and styles, with representatives in western southern
Africa; and section Erythrostictus , featuring white, Hat,
unwinged tepal blades, with representatives in southern
Africa, the Mediterranean area and the Canary Islands.
However, these differential morphological traits are cur-
rently considered irrelevant (Miiller-Doblies & Miiller-
* Jardf Botanic de Barcelona. C. Doctor Font i Quer s/n. 08038
Barcelona, Spain. Corresponding author: e-mail: jbotanicbcn@ inter-
com.es.
** Laboratori de Botanica. Facultad de Farmacia. Universitat de Barce-
lona. Avda. Joan XXIII s/n 08028 Barcelona. Spain.
*** Jardin Botanico Canario Viera y Clavijo. Apartado 14. Tarifa Alta,
35017. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
t Estacio Intemacional de Biologia Mediterrania-Jardi Botanic Mari-
murtra P.O. Box 112. 17300. Blanes. Spain.
MS. received: 2000-11-06.
20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
FIGURE 1. — Distribution of the genus Androcymbium.
Doblies 1990, 1998; Pedrola-Monfort 1993) and, conse-
quently, of little taxonomic value. A previous taxonomic
study based on pollen morphological characters of 1 1
Androcymbium species representing the sections
Erythrostictus and Androcymbium (Martin et al. 1993),
92
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
TABLE 1. — Herbarium specimens of Androcymbium studied in South Africa. Abbreviations of the herbariums follow Holmgren et al. (1990)
KZN. KwaZulu-Natal: NC. Northern Cape; WC, Western Cape.
TABLE 2. — Morphological and biometrical pollen characters of Androcymbium species. Values correspond to the mean ± standard deviations.
Numbers in parenthesis are the minimum and maximum values of each parameter
Ap, no. apertures; EL equatorial long axis; E2, equatorial short axis; MR, microreticulate; P. polar axis; R. rugulate; RA, rugulate-reticulate with
thickened (hypertrophied) muri.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
93
offered four important insights. Firstly, there is no single
pollen character that separates the two sections.
Secondly, a microreticulate exine pattern was observed
in all but the Canary Island species, A. psammophilum
Svent., which has a rugulate exine pattern. Thirdly,
whereas the pollen in section Erythrostictus is always
diaperturate, both di- and triaperturate forms co-exist
within section Androcymbium. And lastly, the pollen size
of the western southern African A. bellum, that was his-
torically ascribed to section Erythrostictus , fits the range
of values observed for the species in section Androcymbium.
Given the variability in pollen traits noted in that sur-
vey, we undertook the analysis of all the measurable
pollen characters, the number of apertures and the exine
patterning in a broader geographic representation of the
genus. The aims of this study are to assess whether there
might be traits of diagnostic value for the three sections
of the genus currently recognized and to examine the
relationship between pollen morphology and geographic
distribution.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sixteen type specimens of Androcymbium were exam-
ined (Table 1), representing southern African species
housed in the Museum Botanicum Berolinense (B),
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K), and Natal Herbarium
(NH).
Pollen was extracted from the anthers with a drop of
alcohol (96%) and then acetolysed according to the
Avetissian micromethod (Avetissian 1950). For the bio-
metric study, pollen grains were mounted in glycerol
jelly and measured with the image analyser IMAT at the
facilities of the Serveis Cientffico-Tecnics of Barcelona
University.
The four biometric characters used (Table 2), follow
Erdtman (1969) and Reitsma (1970). The arithmetical
mean, standard deviation, and maximum and minimum
values were calculated after 15 measurements for each
parameter (Table 2) using the SPSS/PC+ program (SPSS
1984). Exine patterning and the number of apertures
were determined with the aid of a scanning electron
microscope (SEM). The pollen was first mounted onto
SEM stubs and then coated with gold in a diode sputter-
coater. The stubs were observed using a Hitachi 52300
electron microscope at 15 kv at the facilities of the
Serveis Cientffico-Tecnics of Barcelona University.
A test of comparison of means was conducted using
the program SPSS/PC+ (SPSS 1984) to assess the possi-
ble relationship between the pollen parameters consid-
ered. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conduct-
ed using the program NTSYS-PC (Rohlf 1992) to visu-
alize the relationships among the studied species based
on pollen data. For this multivariate analysis, four con-
tinuous quantitative characters (P, El, E2 and P/El
ratio), one discrete quantitative character (aperture num-
ber) and one qualitative character (exine patterning) were
included. The latter was coded as: 1 = microreticulate, 2
= rugulate, or 3 = rugulate-reticulate with thickened
(hypertrophied) muri. We used the arithmetical mean
values of quantitative characters across species to build a
6x16 data matrix that was standardized and used to cal-
culate the correlation matrix after which the principal
components were derived.
RESULTS
General morphology, the pollen of Androcymbium is
heteropolar, planoconvex in equatorial view and elliptic
in polar view, with bilateral symmetry. This pollen mor-
phology is typical of the Colchicaceae (Erdtman 1952,
1969; Diez 1987; Dfez et al. 1985; Martin et al. 1993).
The values of P. El , E2 and P/El ratio are summarized in
Table 2. The smallest pollen is produced by A. volutare,
8.60 x 14.43 x 8.93 pm, and the largest by A. exiguum
subsp. vogelii, 29.61 x 37.14 x 35.23 pm. The pollen
grains of the Androcymbium species examined are con-
siderably smaller than those of the closely related genera
Colchicum L. and Merendera Ram. (Erdtman 1952,
1969; Faegri & Iversen 1975; Dfez 1987; Dfez et al.
1985).
Among the species studied, the most frequent pollen
shape is oblate (0.5 < P/El < 0.69) and found in A. albo-
marginatum, A. burchellii subsp. pulchrum, A. ciliola-
tum , A. circinatum, A. crispum, A. irroratum, A. scabro-
marginatum, A. villosum, and A. volutare. However, the
grains of A. cruciatum tended to be peroblate (P/El =
0. 5), and those of A. dregei, A. decipiens, A. hantamense,
A. henssenianum, A. natalense, and A. exiguum subsp.
vogelii are suboblate (0.70 < P/El < 0.79).
Apertural system: Androcymbium' s pollen apertures
are circular or elliptic pores. Seven of the species exam-
ined (Table 2) are two-zonoporate, anaporate with two
pores either in zonal or in presumed equatorial position
and the third in distal position (Figure 2A). The remain-
ing nine species are two-zonoporate (two pores in zonal
position. Figure 2C, E, G). We have not studied the tetrad
of pollen grains in Androcymbium , but the position of the
pollen grains in the tetrad was well studied in the close-
ly related genus Colchicum (Beguin & Huynh 1978).
Exine patterning', three different exine patterns were
observed among the species of Androcymbium analysed:
1 , microreticulate (Figure 2A-D: Table 2), with the lumi-
na less than 1 pm diameter, observed in A. albomargina-
tum, A. burchellii subsp. pulchrum, A. ciliolatum, A. cir-
cinatum, A. crispum, A. cruciatum, A. hantamense, A.
irroratum, A. scabromarginatum, A. villosum, and A.
volutare', 2, rugulate (Figure 2E, F), observed in A.
decipiens, A. henssenianum, and A. natalense; and 3,
rugulate-reticulate with thickened (hypertrophied) muri
(Figure 2G, H) and lumina’s diameter higher than I pm,
observed in A. dregei and A. exiguum subsp. vogelii.
Pollen terminology follows Blackmore et al. (1992).
Comparison of means: the ANOVA test revealed sig-
nificant differences among species only in terms of the
number of pores and pollen grain size, with diaperturate
pollen tending to be larger than triaperturate pollen.
Furthermore, there are significant differences in the val-
ues of P, El, E2 and P/El ratio for the exine patterning,
Factor 2
94
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 2. — Scanning electron micrographs showing the four pollen
types of Androcymbium observed. A, B. A. scabromarginatum,
Type 1: triaperturate microreticulate, arrow points to third aper-
ture. C, D, A. cruciatum, Type 2: diaperturate microreticulate.
E, F, A. henssenianum, Type 3: diaperturate rugulate. G, H. A.
exiguum subsp. vogelii, Type 4: diaperturate rugulate-reticulate
with thickened (hypertrophied) muri.
TABLE 3. — Values of first and second principal components from
multivariate analysis of pollen characters studied
El, equatorial long axis: E2, equatorial short axis; P. polar axis
with rugulate and rugulate-reticulate grains with thick-
ened (hypertrophied) muri, larger than microreticulate
pollen grains.
Principal component analysis : the first and second
principal components (Table 3) explain 93.5% of the
variance of the sample, 79.1% for the first component —
Factor 1; and 14.4% for the second — Factor 2. Whereas
the former is mainly determined by the biometric char-
acters and the exine pattern (P, El, exine patterning, E2
and P/E ratio, in order of importance), the latter is most
influenced by the number of apertures. The relationships
among species according to this analysis are represented
in a two-dimensional graph (Figure 3).
The results of the PCA indicate four groups of species
with different pollen types:
Type 1: triaperturate (two-zonoporate anaporate),
microreticulate (Figure 2A, B), found in A. albomar-
ginatum, A. ciliolatum, A. circinatum , A. hantamense, A.
irroratum, A. scabromarginatum , and A. villosum (sec-
tion Androcymbium)',
Type 2: diaperturate (two-zonoporate), microreticu-
late (Figure 2C, D), observed in A. crispum, A. burchel-
lii subsp. pulchrum and A. volutare (section Androcymbium)
and in A. cruciatum (section Erythrostictus)',
FIGURE 3. — Two-dimensional graph
representing species in the
PCA. Variance of sample is
93.5 % (79.1 % for factor 1,
and 14.4 % for factor 2).
Names of spp. abbreviated
with first three letters of epi-
thet. Distribution of spp.
indicates four pollen types.
Type 1 : in left lower part, A.
albomarginatum, A. ciliola-
tum, A. circinatum , A. hanta-
mense, A. irroratum, A. sca-
bromarginatum, A. villosum.
Type 2: in left upper part: A.
crispum, A. burchellii subsp.
pulchrum, A. volutare, A.
cruciatum. Type 3: central :
A. decipiens, A. hensseni-
anum, A. natalense. Type 4:
on right, A. dregei, A. exigu-
um subsp. vogelii.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
95
Type 3: diaperturate (two-zonoporate) rugulate
(Figure 2E. F), observed in A. decipiens, A. hensseni-
anum, and A. natalense (section Androcymbium)-,
Type 4: diaperturate (two-zonoporate), rugulate-retic-
ulate with thickened (hypertrophied) muri (Figure 2G,
H), found in A. dregei and A. exiguum subsp. vogelii
(section Dregeocymbium).
DISCUSSION
Taxonomic implications
According to our results, the southern African species
of Androcymbium contain most of the diversity of pollen
types described for the entire genus (Figure 2). The most
common exine patterning observed in this geographical
region is microreticulate (Figure 2A-D) and was found
both in species from section Androcymbium and in sec-
tion Erythrostictus (A. cruciatum in Miiller-Doblies &
Mtiller-Doblies 1984). Although all the species with tri-
aperturate pollen (Type 1 ) are in section Androcymbium,
this fact is of very limited taxonomic value, since rough-
ly half of the species within this section exhibit diapertu-
rate pollen (Types 2 and 3) and pollen Type 2 was also
observed in most of the North African Androcymbium
species (section Erythrostictus ) by Martin et al. ( 1993).
The diversity of pollen shape notwithstanding, two
additional facts hinder an unambiguous sectional charac-
terization in the genus Androcymbium. Firstly, the pollen
of the taxa within section Androcymbium (A. burcliellii
subsp. pulchrum, A. crispum and A. volutare) is indistin-
guishable from that of A. cruciatum, which belongs to
section Erythrostictus. Secondly, the rugulate exine pat-
terning (Type 3; Figure 2E, F) observed in A. decipiens,
A. henssenianum and A. natalense (section Androcymbium)
was also found in the Canary Island A. psammophilum,
which belongs to section Erythrostictus (Martin et al.
1993). However, the relevance of the latter observation is
only minor because, unlike A. decipiens, A. henssenianum,
and A. natalense, the structural elements of A. psam-
mophilum are always less than 1 pm in diameter and might
be considered as a different pollen pattern.
By contrast, the pollen of the constituents of section
Dregeocymbium, A. dregei and A. exiguum subsp. voge-
lii, can be unambiguously characterized in terms of two
traits: a significantly larger grain size and a rugulate
exine pattern (Type 4, Figure 2G, H).
Section Androcymbium embraces a diverse array of
pollen types, including either microreticulate or rugulate
exine patterning, and di- or triaperturate pollen grains.
Species from section Erythrostictus have microreticulate
exine patterning and diaperturate pollen grains, and share
these features with some of the species of section
Androcymbium.
Biogeographic and evolutionary implications
A microreticulate exine pattern is a general feature of
species in the families Liliaceae and Colchicaceae
(Erdtman 1952, 1969; Valdes 1978; Diez 1987; Diez et
al. 1985) and is considered to be the plesiomorphic con-
dition for the Liliales (Goldblatt 1990; Goldblatt &
Henrich 1991). Although the species of Androcymbium
that have a microreticulate exine pattern (Type 1 and 2)
occur in two of the three broad areas of distribution of
the genus (western southern Africa and North Africa), we
cannot assert that this feature is represented in all areas
of distribution until the study of some species from east-
ern southern Africa (mainly those within the Androcymbium
melanthioides complex) is completed.
By contrast, rugulate forms (Type 3) are considered
evolutionarily recent and have been observed both in
western southern African (A. henssenianum) and eastern
southern African species (A. decipiens and A. natalense).
Rugulate-reticulate exine pattern with thickened (hyper-
trophied) muri can also be considered evolutionarily
recent and is present only in the western southern African
species A. dregei and A. exiguum subsp. vogelii (section
Dregeocymbium). Thus, available evidence indicates that
more recent exine pattern types are exclusive to southern
African species, whereas plesiomorphic forms occur
both in this region and in northern Africa. However, our
survey failed to detect a geographic pattern in the genus,
because southern African species exhibit a high variabil-
ity of exine patterning.
The pollen of the tribe Colchiceae is generally char-
acterized by two, three or four apertures (Erdtman 1952,
1969; Diez 1987; Diez et al. 1985), although four aper-
tures have been reported much less frequently (Dahlgren
et al. 1985). Where the pollen grains are triaperturate, the
two equatorially positioned apertures are pores, whereas
the third one, situated at the distal pole, is an ulcus
(Erdtman 1952, 1969). The dichotomy observed in terms
of number of apertures in Androcymbium has evolution-
ary implications. As a rule, the monosulcate aperture is con-
sidered the most primitive in the monocotyledons (Nair
1970; Goldblatt 1990; Goldblatt et al. 1991). Some authors
argue that the porate apertural system derives from a reduc-
tion of the aperture zone, and the triaperturate form rep-
resents a transition from monosulcate to two-zonoporate
(Thanikaimoni 1986; Takhtajan 1991). Given that species
of Androcymbium having triaperturate pollen occur only in
western southern Africa, our data support the hypothesis
that this area might be the ancestral area of distribution
of the genus (Margelf et al. 1999; Caujape-Castells et al.
1999, 2001). However, this conclusion must be comple-
mented with the pollen morphological survey of the
species of Androcymbium distributed in eastern southern
Africa that could not be included in this work.
CONCLUSIONS
Although our results suggest a general trend towards
parallel evolution of pollen size and structural complex-
ity of exine pattern in Androcymbium, they do not indi-
cate a relationship between pollen morphology and geo-
graphic distribution. Species with pollen Type 2
(microreticulate exine pattern with diaperturate apertural
system) are ubiquitous and occur throughout the range of
the genus. The presence of the third aperture in the distal
96
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
position in triaperturate pollen, which has been consid-
ered by previous authors to be more primitive than the
diaperturate condition, was observed only in western
southern African species of Androcymbium. Pending the
survey of some of the eastern southern African species
that could not be included in this work, this result
enforces the hypothesis that western southern Africa is
the ancestral area of distribution for the genus. The
pollen characteristics only reflect the currently accepted
sectional subdivision of the genus in the two species of
section Dregeocymbium. These results prompt a thor-
ough re-examination of macromorphological characters
in Androcymbium to assess whether the present sectional
classification should be modified.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the curators of the Museum Botanicum
Berolinense (B), the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K),
and the Natal Herbarium (NH) for allowing us to take
pollen samples from the type specimens analysed in this
work. We also thank Dra Julia Perez de Paz for the revi-
sion of the manuscript. This study was supported by the
Karl Faust Foundation.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD. T.H. & DE WET. B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 62: 131.
AVETISSIAN. E.M. 1950. Metodo simplificado de preparation de
polen por acetolisis. (In Russian) Zliurnal Russkogo
Botanyceskogo Obscestva pri Akademi nauk USSR 35: 385.
BEGUIN. C. & HUYNH. K. 1978. L’ arrangement du pollen dipore
Heteropolaire du genre Colchicum (Liliaceae). Bulletin Societe
neuchateloise des Sciences nature lies: t. 101.
BLACKMORE. S„ LE THOMAS, A.. NILSSON. S. & PUNT, W.
1992. A glossary of palynological terms. University of Utrecht,
The Netherlands.
CAUJAPE-CASTELLS. J„ JANSEN, R.K.. PEDROLA-MONFORT.
J. & MEMBRIVES, N. 1999. Chloroplast DNA Restriction Site
Phylogeny of the genus Androcymbium (Colchicaceae)
Systematic Botany 24: 581-597.
CAUJAPE-CASTELLS. J.. JANSEN, R.K.. MEMBRIVES, N.,
PEDROLA-MONFORT, J., MONTSERRAT, J.M. & ARDANUY,
A. 2001. Historical biogeography of Androcymbium Willd.
(Colchicaceae): evidence from cpDNA RFLPs. Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 379-392.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T.. CLIFFORD. H.T. & YEO. P.F. 1985. The fami-
lies of the monocotyledons: structure evolution and taxonomy.
Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
DIEZ. M.J. 1987. Liliaceae. In B. Valdes, M.J. Diez & I. Fernandez,
Atlas polinico de Aiulalua'a Occidental: 379-395. Instituto de
Desarrollo Regional de la Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla,
Spain.
DIEZ, M.J., VALDES, B. & PASTOR. J.E. 1985. Contribution a la
palinologla de Liliaceae en Andalucfa Occidental (excepto sub-
familias Scilloideae i Allioideae). Anales de la Asociacion de
Palinologos de Lengua Espahola 2: 191-206.
ERDTMAN, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy:
angiosperms. Almqvist & Wiksell. Stockholm.
ERDTMAN, G. 1969. Handbook of paly nolo gy: an introduction to the
study of pollen grains and spores. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
FAEGRI. K. & 1VERSEN, J. 1975. Textbook of pollen analysis, edn 3.
Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of Iridaceae.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 607-627 .
GOLDBLATT. P & HENRICH, J.E. 1991. Calydorea Herbert
(Iridaceae-Tigridieae): notes on this New World genus and
reduction to synonymy of Salpingostylis, Cardiostigma, Itysa ,
and Catila. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78:
504-511.
HOLMGREN, P.K.. HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT. L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, edn 8. New York Botanical Garden, New
York.
KRAUSE, K. 1921. Revision der Gattung Androcymbium Willd.
Notizblatt des Botanisclien Gartens unci Museums zu Berlin-
Dahlem 7.70.XI: 512-526.
MARGELL M„ PEDROLA-MONFORT. J. & VALLES XIRAU. J.
1999. Karyological studies in the genus Androcymbium
(Colchicaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 47: 131-146.
MARTIN, J., PEDROLA-MONFORT J. & CAUJAPE-CASTELLS. J.
1993. Pollen morphology and biometry in Androcymbium
(Colchicaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 1369-1374.
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D. 1984. Zur
Kenntnis der Gattung Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) im
siidlichen Afrika: Zwei Synonyma und fiinf neue Arten.
Willdenowia 14: 179-197.
MULLER-DOBLIES. U. & MULLER-DOBLIES. D. 1990. Zur
Kenntnis der Gattung Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) im
siidlichen Afrika: 2. Androcymbium exiguum hat doch Artwert.
Willdenowia 19: 453-470.
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES. D. 1998. De
Liliifloris Notulae. 6. De decuria prima specierum novarum
generis Androcymbium sect. Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) in
Africa Australi s.l. Praeterea novitates de huius sectionis non-
nullarum specierum distributione (praesertim aucta speci-
minibus Stellenbosensibus i.a. collectis a botanico vero E.G.H.
Olivero). Feddes Repertorium 109.7-8: 551-572.
NAIR, P.K.K. 1970. Pollen morphology of angiosperms. An historical
and phylogenetic study. Scholar Publishing House, Lucknow.
Vikas Publication. Delhi. Bombay, London.
PEDROLA-MONFORT. J. 1993. Biologia poblacional del complexe
Androcymbium gramineum seccio Erythrostictus Benth.
(Colchicaceae). Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Valencia.
PEDROLA-MONFORT. J., MEMBRIVES. N.. MONTSERRAT. J.M.
& CAUJAPE-CASTELLS. J. 1999a. A new species from west-
ern South Africa: Androcymbium huntleyi (Colchicaceae)
Fontqueria 53: 1, 2.
PEDROLA-MONFORT, J„ MEMBRIVES, N. & MONTSERRAT.
J.M. 1999b. Two new androcymbia (Colchicaceae) from
Western South Africa. Fontqueria 54,2: 7-9.
PEDROLA-MONFORT, J., MEMBRIVES, N„ MONTSERRAT. J.M.
& CAUJAPE-CASTELLS. J. In press. Systematic relationships
of some species of the genus Androcymbium Willd. (Colchicaceae)
in western South Africa. Botdnica Macaronesica 24.
REITSMA, T. 1970. Suggestions toward unification of descriptive ter-
minology of angiosperm pollen grains. Review of Palaeobotany
and Palynology 10: 39-60.
ROHLF, F.J. 1992. NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate
analysis system. Stauket: Exeter software.
SPSS 1984. Statistical and reporting software for IBM PC and DEC
Professional 350. Chicago.
TAKHTAJAN, A. 1991. Evolutionary trends of flowering plants.
Columbia University Press. New York.
THANIKAIMON1, G. 1986. Pollen and spores: form and function. The
Linnean Society of London, ser. 12: 119-136.
VALDES, B. 1978. Merendera androcymbioides Valdes sp. nov.
Lagascalia 7,2: 159-162.
Bothalia 32.1: 97-100(2002)
Biogeography of Oxalis (Oxalidaceae) in South Africa: a preliminary
study
K.C. OBERLANDER.* L.L. DREYER* and K.J. ESLER*
Keywords: biogeography, diversity, endemism, Fynbos, Oxalis L., refugia. South Africa, Succulent Karoo
ABSTRACT
Oxalis L.. commonly called sorrel, is a large and cosmopolitan taxon that has undergone spectacular speciation within
southern Africa (± 270 taxa), and more specifically within the winter rainfall regions of the western Cape Region (CR). The
main objective of this study was to analyse the geographical distribution of Oxalis in South Africa in relation to currently
defined phytogeographic units. The observed patterns of biodiversity and endemism within South African members of the
genus show interesting disjunctions and concentrations of species. Oxalis is one of the few CR taxa that is shared between
the core Fynbos and Succulent Karoo Biomes, and this study therefore provides a novel insight into evolutionary trends
across, and not only within, these phytogeographic units. The major centre for diversity for Oxalis is situated on Table
Mountain and the northern areas of the Cape Peninsula (grid square 3318CD). Subsidiary centres are located in the
Clanwilliam/Niewoudtville and Kamiesberg regions. The reported patterns in Western Cape suggest that Oxalis species
richness has been generated and retained in areas which have been identified as core Fynbos (Table Mountain), Fynbos refu-
gia during interglacials (Kamiesberg). and an ecotonal region which might switch between the two biome types
(Clanwilliam/ Niewoudtville). Presumably these three types of areas would provide interesting material for DNA-based
phylogenetic work, and a test of the climate change 'species-pump' hypothesis proposed by Midgley et al. (2001).
INTRODUCTION
Oxalis L. (Oxalidaceae) is a large and cosmopolitan
genus, including more than 800 species (Chant 1993).
Most of its range is covered by a limited number of
species, such as O. pes-caprae L. and O. comiculata L.,
which are ubiquitous weeds (Salter 1944).
Oxalis has two well-developed centres of diversity,
which represent over 90% of the species. One centre is
located in South-Central America, including more than
500 species. The other is in South Africa, more specifi-
cally within the Cape Region (CR) (Cowling & Hilton-
Taylor 1997), where ± 150 species are found in an area
of less than 90 000 km2, with extensions both northwards
and eastwards along the coast. In total, southern Africa
hosts ± 270 Oxalis taxa (Dreyer 1996). The Cape
Region, as defined by Cowling & Hilton-Taylor (1997),
coincides with the Fynbos Biome, but also includes
enclaves of karoo and forest, which form part of the
Succulent Karoo and Forest Biomes respectively
(Rutherford & Westfall 1986).
There has been a tremendous degree of speciation
among the CR representatives. A number of other fami-
lies and genera with cosmopolitan distributions exhibit
similar patterns of massive speciation within the region.
Examples include the Proteaceae, with 330 species in the
region, as opposed to roughly 70 species within the rest
of Africa (Rebelo 1995), the Restionaceae with 275
species (Cowling & Richardson 1995), the Mesem-
bryanthemaceae, with 1 800 species (Smith et al. 1998)
and the genus Erica L., with 658 species (Goldblatt &
Manning 2000).
* Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, 7600 Matieland.
Stellenbosch.
MS. received: 2000-06-08.
Possible reasons for the dramatic speciation within
the CR have been suggested (Linder 1985; Cowling et al.
1992). A combination of topographic gradients (Linder et
al. 1992) and the regular occurrence of fire (Cowling
1987) have been suggested as the main driving factors
towards speciation. although the latter two explanations
are not entirely appropriate for the Succulent Karoo
Biome, which forms part of the CR. More recently, evi-
dence has been published supporting the ‘species pump'
hypothesis (Midgley et al. 2001) that Pleistocene climate
change played a role in determining plant species rich-
ness and phytogeographic patterns in the greater Cape
Mediterranean region (Goldblatt 1978). Although some
work has been done on the distribution of plant species
within the CR, it has focused almost exclusively on taxa
predominantly confined to the Fynbos Biome, the typical
but not exclusive vegetation type of the CR (Oliver et al.
1983). Despite some cursory observations by Salter
(1944), very little has been published on the distribution
of Oxalis within South Africa. The aim of this study was
to map the distribution of this genus within South Africa,
and to analyse the geographical distribution of Oxalis in
South Africa in relation to currently defined phytogeo-
graphic units.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data on the distribution of Oxalis were obtained from
Salter ( 1944) and the Pretoria Computerised Information
System (PRECIS) database. These data were provided in
16th degree grid square increments, and provided distri-
butional information for 237 of the 270 taxa. This is cur-
rently the most complete and up-to-date list of biogeo-
graphical data available for the genus, given the taxo-
nomic uncertainty within several sections of Oxalis.
Nevertheless, the total of 237 represents ± 88% of even
the most comprehensive list of Oxalis taxa, and is thus
considered adequate to represent the entire genus within
98
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
FIGURE 1. — Oxalis diversity in
South Africa.
the country. Most of the taxa not included are taxonomi-
cally unresolved or vague.
Totals for each 16th degree grid square (which would
provide taxon numbers for that grid square i.e. richness)
and for each taxon restricted to only one, or two adjacent,
16th degree grid squares (i.e. reasonable marker for
endemism levels) were extracted.
These data were then summarized at quarter degree
grid square level, and the repeats eliminated. The figures
were transferred to the appropriate grid squares on maps
of South Africa.
RESULTS
Oxalis is distributed throughout the study area (Figure
I), with an observed increase in diversity and endemism
levels to the south and west of South Africa (with the
notable exception of the Great Karoo), culminating with-
in the CR, where the vast majority of taxa are located.
This pattern is a classic example of the distribution of
many prominent CR families and genera.
Three centres of diversity were identified. The largest
and most speciose is positioned on the Cape Peninsula,
extending to the Kogelberg/Hottentot's Holland Moun-
tain Ranges to the east. Although the two ranges are sep-
arated by the Cape Flats, they are considered as a single
unit for the purposes of this project, because of the high
degree of Oxalis species shared between them (60%).
A secondary centre of diversity is situated in the
Clanwilliam/Niewoudtville region. Although not as spe-
ciose as the Hottentots Holland epicentre, this region
contains a wide range of unique species, both within
Oxalis and in other taxonomic groups (Schumann &
Kirsten 1992; Rebelo 1995). This epicentre is higher in
altitude and further inland than the Cape Peninsula, and
thus has a somewhat different, more arid, climate.
The third main centre of Oxalis biodiversity is situat-
ed in the Kamiesberg region of the Northern Cape. This
is a region of extreme botanical interest as the unique
Namaqualand and Richtersveld areas, containing many
semi-desert paleo- and neo-endemics, surround it. In
addition, the region still harbours fynbos taxa (Cowling
& Pierce 1999), probably isolated there after the retreat
of the last glacial maximum (Midgley et al. 2001).
Other minor centres of diversity occur throughout
South Africa, but at least two can be considered some-
what biased as they are located near or on major cities,
and have therefore been extensively collected. These two
sites are located on the Witwatersrand and on Algoa Bay
grid squares, the first containing the cities of Johannes-
burg and Pretoria and the latter the city of Port Elizabeth.
The Cape Peninsula centre probably also shows some
collecting bias, as it is located on a major city, and is the
site of South Africa’s main Botanical Gardens at
Kirstenbosch. Collection records for the Cape Peninsula
are probably much better than for Namaqualand, in part
due to the brief and ephemeral appearance of Oxalis
species. Collectors in more remote areas, which are vis-
ited only occasionally and not on such a regular basis as
areas around Cape Town, may easily miss these plants.
At present no reason can be offered for the existence of
other sites, such as the one located in Swaziland and in
the East London/Umtata area. The last centre, located on
the eastern Langeberg/Outeniqua, could possibly also be
a southern Cape refugium.
Oxalis is represented throughout most of the rest of
South Africa by only six species, namely O. clepressa
Eckl. & Zeyh., O. obliquifolia Steud. ex Rich., O. obtusa
Jacq., O. semiloba Solid., O. smithiana Eckl. & Zeyh.,
and the naturalized American species O. corniculata L.
All taxa confined to one, or to two adjacent 16th
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
99
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
FIGURE 2. — Oxalis endemism in
South Africa. The numbers
refer to the number of
endemic species within each
quarter degree square.
degree grid squares were considered adequate to repre-
sent local scale endemism (Figure 2). Several of the
diversity centres are confirmed as centres of endemism,
such as the Hottentots Holland. Clanwilliam/Niewoudt-
ville and southern Cape centres. The most speciose
square, centred on Table Mountain, contains only one en-
demic species, which is a surprisingly low value. How-
ever. this might be an artefact of scale. The Kamiesberg
Centre is not represented. A species regarded as endemic
according to our criteria, occurs within southern Mpu-
malanga, in grid square 2530D. Oxalis davyana Knuth is
a taxonomically isolated species assigned to a monotypic
subsection (Section Eu-cemuae subsection Goetzea) by
Salter (1944), and is biogeographically equally isolated
from other centres of endemism.
The top ten hot spots, defined as the ten most speciose
squares at 16th degree grid square level, all feature more
than 20 species, with four containing 30 species or more
(Table 1). Between them, these ten squares contain 137
taxa. ± 58% of the total complement. The most speciose
square, centred on Table Mountain, contains 40 species,
over one sixth of the total in the database. These areas are
top priorities for conservation, at least in terms of Oxalis
(Rebelo 1994). As mentioned previously, it should be
TABLE 1. — Ten most speciose grid squares: Oxalis diversity from
the PRECIS database
noted that several, if not most of these areas are heavily
subject to collecting bias, but this does not invalidate
their essential conservation value.
DISCUSSION
Oliver et al. (1983) have provided a recent compre-
hensive analysis of CR phytogeography, including a dis-
tributional analysis of 1 936 species in Fynbos Biome
families. According to this analysis, a typical CR taxon
would show a maximum centre of diversity within the
Caledon District; more specifically the Kogelberg massif
located in grid square 341 8BB, with species numbers
and endemism levels tailing off towards the north and
east. Despite the huge sample size and the undoubted
value of the Oliver et al. (1983) analysis, their approach
has been criticized for focusing exclusively on Fynbos
families and ignoring the other major biomes of the CR,
namely Succulent Karoo and Afromontane Forest (Bayer
1984). As has been noted by various authors (Levyns
1963; Cowling & Hilton-Taylor 1997), the floras of the
three biomes (Rutherford & Westfall 1986) are taxonomi-
cally distinct at virtually every level and very few genera
are shared between them. Oxalis provides a useful
exception, in that it is one of the few taxa that is shared
between the core Fynbos and Succulent Karoo Biomes.
Some others include members of the genus Pelargonium
L'Her., section Hoarea DC. (Marais 1994), Crassula L.
as well as certain members of the Mesembryanthe-
maceae, such as Ruschia Schwantes and Lampranthus
N.E.Br. (Jurgens 1991). It is notable that all of these taxa
are adapted to a geophytic or succulent lifestyle.
Midgley et al. (2001 ) point out that geophytic growth
forms are resilient to the drought and fire disturbance
regimes that characterize both biomes. This would have
enabled geophytes to thrive even during periods of cli-
matic change and associated successive replacements of
the Succulent Karoo and Fynbos Biomes with one anoth-
100
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
er during Pleistocene fluctuations. They offer this as an
explanation for the hitherto unexplained diversity of geo-
phytes at the interface between the two biomes. Oxcilis,
which is geophytic in southern Africa, fits this pattern.
Thus the most unusual feature of Oxcilis distribution, the
strong representation along the west coast and subsidiary
centres of diversity within the Clanwilliam/Niewoudt-
ville and Kamiesberg areas, is easily explained. Bio-
climatic modelling suggests that they were some of sev-
eral fynbos refugia maintained over the last glacial peri-
od (Midgley et al. 2001).
It is notable that the centre of diversity for Oxalis is
not situated in the grid square 3418BB. highlighted by
Oliver et al. (1983), as is the case for many other Fynbos
families. The most diverse centre is, in fact, further north
and west, on the drier plains of the Boland and West
Coast (Table 1). Grid square 3418BB is notably absent
from the list of ten most speciose grid squares for Oxalis.
Several authors, including Levyns (1963), have indi-
cated that the centre of diversity for the Succulent Karoo
is further north and west, to the drier, more Mediter-
ranean parts of the CR, than the typical Fynbos centre.
Although Oxalis is not a pure Succulent Karoo taxon,
our data are consistent with such a conclusion.
In this paper, several of the diversity centres are also
confirmed as centres of endemism, such as the Hottentots-
Holland, Clanwilliam/Niewoudtville and southern Cape.
The fact that the Kamiesberg Centre does not contain
Oxalis endemics could be due to the recent nature of its
isolation from the southwestern Cape region in terms of
climate and flora. The Kamiesberg Fynbos outlier may
have been isolated for only roughly 12 000 to 1 5 000 years
(since the end of the Pleistocene). This could mean that
not enough time has elapsed for consequent genetic isola-
tion and speciation to occur. This is supported by observa-
tions in other families in the region. Of the seven Erica
species that occur on the Kamiesberg, all seven are also
represented further south (Cowling & Pierce 1999), and
both Proteaceae species, although endemic, are closely
related to southern species (Rebelo 1995; Reeves 2001).
In conclusion, Oxalis is one of few genera that exploit
both the Succulent Karoo and Fynbos Biomes successful-
ly and prolifically. Thus this genus provides an excellent
opportunity to assess various hypotheses relating to
diversification in the CR. Richardson et al. (2001) pro-
duced the first DNA phylogeny that suggests a recent
rapid floristic diversification in the CR. The geographic
distribution of taxon richness within Oxalis discussed in
this paper, sets the stage for further promising DNA-
based phylogenetic work in this region. Such an approach
will be critical in developing an understanding of the fac-
tors responsible and the time scales involved in the gene-
sis of the floristic biodiversity hotspots of the fire-prone
Fynbos and drought-prone Succulent Karoo Biomes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the University of Stellenbosch for funding
this project, and Dr E.M. Marais for comments on the
manuscript. We also thankfully acknowledge useful
comments by two anonymous referees.
REFERENCES
BAYER. M.B. 1984. The Cape Flora and the Karoo — a winter rainfall
biome versus a fynbos biome! Veld & Flora 70: 17-19.
BAYER, M.B. 1992. Salter's revision of South African Oxalis
(Oxalidacae) and some new combinations. Herbertiq 48: 58-69.
CHANT. S.R. 1993. Oxalidaceae. In V.H. Heywood. Flowering plants
of the world. Batsford, London.
COWLING, R.M. 1987. Fire and its role in coexistence and speciation
in Gondwanan shrublands. South African Journal of Science
83: 106-112.
COWLING. R.M. & HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997. Phytogeography,
flora and endemism. In R.M. Cowling, D.M. Richardson &
S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
COWLING. R.M.. HOLMES. P.M. & REBELO. A.G. 1992. Plant diversity
and endemism. In R.M. Cowling, The ecology of fynbos: nutrients,
fire and diversity: 62-112. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
COWLING. R.M. & PIERCE, S.M. 1999. Namaqualand: a succulent
desert. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg.
COWLING, R.M. & RICHARDSON, D.M. 1995. Fynbos: South
Africa's unique floral kingdom. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg.
DREYER, L.L. 1996. A palynological review of Oxalis in southern
Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern Africa: its
characteristics, relationships, and origins. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 369 — 436.
GOLDBLATT. P. & MANNING, J. 2000. Floristic composition. In P.
Goldblatt & J. Manning, Cape Plants. A conspectus of the Cape
flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 10, 11.
JURGENS, N. 1991. A new approach to the Namib Region 1: phyto-
geographic subdivision. Vegetatio 97: 21-38.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1963. Presidential address: migrations and origin of
the Cape Flora. Transactions of the Royal Society of South
Africa 37: 85-107.
LINDER, H.P. 1985. Gene flow, speciation, and species diversity pat-
terns in a species-rich area: the Cape Flora. In E.S. Vrba,
Species and speciation: 53-57. Transvaal Museum Monograph
No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
LINDER, H.P. MEADOWS. M.E. & COWLING. R.M. 1992. History
of the Cape Flora. In R.M. Cowling, The ecology of fynbos.
Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
MARAIS, E.M. 1994. Taxonomic studies in Pelargonium Section
Hoarea (Geraniaceae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Stellen-
bosch, Stellenbosch.
MIDGLEY, G.F., HANNAH. L.. ROBERTS. R.. MCDONALD. D.J. &
ALLSOPP. J. 2001. Have Pleistocene climatic cycles influ-
enced species richness patterns in the greater Cape Mediter-
ranean region? Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 2: 137-144.
OLIVER, E.G.H., LINDER. H.P. & ROURKE. J.P 1983. Geographical
distribution of present-day Cape taxa and their phytogeograph-
ical significance. Bothalia 14: 427-440.
REBELO. A.G. 1994. Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism
and optimal placement of reserves. Strelitzia 1 : 231-257.
REBELO, A.G. 1995. SASOL proteas: a field guide to the proteas of
southern Africa. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg.
REEVES, G. 2001. Radiation and macroevolutionary ecology of the
African genus Protea. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College and NERC
Centre for Population Biology, University of London.
RICHARDSON, J.E., WEITZ, F.M.. FAY, M.F., CRONK. Q.C.B..
LINDER. H.P. REEVES, G. & CHASE, M.W. 2001.
Phylogenetic analysis of Phylica L. (Rhamnaceae) with an
emphasis on island species: evidence from plastid trnL-F and
nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal) DNA sequences.
Taxon 50: 405-427.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South A frica No. 54: 98.
SALTER, T.M. 1 944. The genus Oxalis in South Africa: a taxonomic revi-
sion. Journal of South African Botany. The Cape Times, Cape Town.
SCHUMANN, D. & KIRSTEN. G. 1992. Ericas of South Africa.
Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg.
SMITH, G.F., CHESSELET, P. VAN JAARSVELD, E.J.. HART-
MANN, H . HAMMER. S„ VAN WYK. B.-E.. BURGOYNE,
P„ KLAK, C. & KURZWEIL, H. 1998. Mesembs of the world.
Briza Publications, Pretoria.
Bothalia 32,1: 101-115 (2002)
A checklist of the plants of Mahwaqa Mountain, KwaZulu-Natal
E.B. METER*, T.J. EDWARDS*t, M.A. RENNIE* and J.E. GRANGER*
Keywords: afromontane. Bulwer. checklist, flora, grassland. KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
ABSTRACT
A checklist of the plants of Mahwaqa Mountain. KwaZulu-Natal, is presented. The list includes 1 030 indigenous and
naturalized flowering plants and fems. Comparisons are made with the floras of KwaZulu-Natal (Ross 1972), the Cape of
Good Hope Nature Reserve, Cape Point (Taylor 1985), the southern Natal Drakensberg (Hilliard & Burtt 1987), the
Amatolas (Phillipson 1987), the Langeberg (McDonald 1999) and Umtamvuna Nature Reserve (Abbott el al. 2000). It is
hoped that the publication of this list will contribute towards the recognition of the area as a natural heritage site.
INTRODUCTION
The Grassland Biome covers 343 000 km2 or 16.5%
of the land area in South Africa and supports the greatest
human population densities and the highest levels of
agricultural utilization on the subcontinent, consequently
it is under considerable conservation threat. Only 1.12%
of South African grasslands are currently conserved
despite the fact that they contain high levels of floristic
diversity (Rutherford & Westfall 1994). Some idea of the
heterogeneity of the Grassland Biome can be gleaned
from the fact that it accommodates 25 of Acocks’s veld
types. Comparative aspects of biodiversity are limited by
size disparity in the geographic areas under considera-
tion. However, it is pertinent to mention that our collec-
tions from this single mountain exceed 1 000 spp. and
the whole of the Cape Peninsula was estimated to sup-
port in the region of 2 622 spp. (Adamson & Salter
1950).
Mahwaqa Mountain falls into the Zambezian Sub-
region which boasts a number of endemic genera, most
of which are concentrated in Angola and in the
Drakensberg system, in fact the latter is characterized by
a high percentage of local endemics (Takhtajan 1986;
Hilliard & Burtt 1987; Cowling & Hilton-Taylor 1997).
The mountain falls under Acocks's (1988) Veld Type
44a, Highland Sourveld. About 51.3% of this veld type
occurs in KwaZulu-Natal and, of this, 8.7% is protected.
Unfortunately, the great majority of conserved vegeta-
tion falls within a single reserve. Natal Drakensberg
Park, and consequently geographic diversity is under-
represented (Scott-Shaw et al. 1996). To address this
problem it is essential to have information pertaining to
the floristic diversity in geographically distinct areas. In
this way the conservation importance of such areas,
under the threat of agricultural exploitation, can be
assessed in some detail.
Mahwaqa Mountain is an outlier of the main
Drakensberg and is situated about 50 km to the south of
* School of Botany & Zoology, University of Natal, Private Bag X01,
3209 Scottsville.
tAuthor to whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received; 2001-02-12.
Drakensberg Gardens between 29° 40'S and 29° 50'S lati-
tude and 29° 38 'W and 29° 40 'W longitude. The moun-
tain is almost completely surrounded by cultivated land,
with the Mossbank Plantation to the south and farmlands
to the north, east and west. This situation is dynamic with
an ever increasing number of farmers planting exotic
timber.
The mountain lies within Turner’s (Philips 1973)
physiographic region — Bulwer Block — with an altitudi-
nal range of 1 700 m to almost 2 000 m above sea level.
The highest point of Mahwaqa Mountain (2 075 m) com-
prises a basalt cap overlying Clarens Sandstone, with
yellow and red apedal, freely drained, dystrophic soils,
which have a tendency to be highly leached (Van
Oudtshoom 1992).
Mahwaqa is in the summer rainfall region of south-
western KwaZulu-Natal, with peak precipitation
between November and March (Schulze 1982). The
summit of the mountain is largely grassland, but intact
patches of indigenous forest occur in the sheltered areas,
from which fire is excluded, and the largest of these is
Inkelabantwana Forest.
The vegetation on a large portion of the mountain is
fairly pristine and forms part of a biosphere reserve.
Extensive collections have been made by M.A. Rennie
on Sunset and Glengariff Farms which are adjacent to the
biosphere reserve and reach a maximum elevation of
1 985 m.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Provisional species inventories for the area were
obtained from M.A. Rennie and species lists (no vouch-
er specimens) were provided by R. Scott-Shaw and K.
Cooper. In most instances this information was verified
and supplemented by a study of herbarium specimens in
the Natal University Herbarium (NU) and by a literature
search. PRECIS [National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE)
Computerised Information System] was consulted and
the relevant data was extracted and cross-referenced with
voucher specimens at PRE. For the most part, the
arrangement of the checklist conforms to the Englerian
102
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
system, followed by De Dalla Torre & Harms (1907) and
Arnold & De Wet (1993). The liverworts follow Perold
(1999). Naturalized weeds are marked with an asterisk (*).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The flora of Mahwaqa Mountain includes well over
1 000 indigenous species (Table 1) and this constitutes
over 21% of the diversity in KwaZulu-Natal (with the
total number of Anthophyta for KwaZulu-Natal being
4 875; Hilliard & Burtt 1987). This a-diversity compares
favourably with the Amatole Mountains, 1 215 spp.
(Phillipson 1987), the Langeberg, 1 228 spp. (McDonald
1999) and Umtamvuna Nature Reserve, 1 332 spp.
(Abbott et al. 2000).
There are 45 pteridophytes comprising 4.4% of the
mountain’s flora. The ratio of monocotyledons to dicoty-
ledons on Mahwaqa is 1; 2.1. Ten families of flowering
plants are very well represented and collectively constitute
over half (53%) of the total species (Table 2). Nineteen fami-
lies each contribute more than 1% to the total number of
species, collectively accounting for 67% of the species. It is
interesting to note that the diversity of pteridophytes is high
at the family level but low at the species level. Conversely,
the monocotyledons show a trend with proportional incre-
ments at the generic and species levels. This possibly indi-
cates a fairly low number of families rapidly speciating in
conjunction with the spread of the Grassland Biome.
The floristics of many South African habitats are domi-
nated by the Asteraceae (Taylor 1985; Westfall et al.
1986; Hilliard & Burtt 1987; Van Wyk et al. 1988; Deall
& Backer 1989). This family is also dominant on
Mahwaqa Mountain (15.6%, Tables 2; 3). Asteraceae is
represented by fewer species on Mahwaqa than in the
southern Drakensberg, but are better represented on the
Mountain than in KwaZulu-Natal as a whole (Table 3).
This trend in the data was expected, as Asteraceae is the
largest family in KwaZulu-Natal and its highest diversity
occurs in the Drakensberg (Hilliard 1978). The family is
characterized by speciation in the Grassland Biome, the
major habitat on Mahwaqa Mountain. The higher species
diversity recorded in the southern Drakensberg (Hilliard
& Burtt 1987) probably reflects the recruitment of Cape
elements in this region and the Amatolas and Langeberg
show similar levels of diversity (Table 4). Within the
Asteraceae a number of southern Drakensberg endemics
have been recorded from the mountain including Felicia
linearis, Helichrysum sessiUoides , H. vernum, Osteo-
spermum attenuatum, Othonna burttii, Senecio dregea-
nus, S. hirsutilobus and Vemonia flanaganii.
TABLE I. — Number of families, genera and species of Pteridophyta,
Monocotyledonae and Dicotyledonae recorded on Mahwaqa
Mountain, KwaZulu-Natal
TABLE 2. — Synopsis of families which contribute 1% or more of total
number of species for Mahwaqa. together with number of gen-
era in each family
Poaceae is the second most diverse family in the study
area (Tables 2; 3), dominating in terms of biomass, as the
mountain falls primarily within the Grassland Biome.
Grasses also constitute one of the main contributors to the
Natal flora (Hilliard 1978). Gibbs Russell et al. (1990)
identified a number of endemic Drakensberg grasses,
some of which occur on the mountain (Agrostis barbulig-
era var. barbuligera, Cynodon hirsutus, Digitaria tri-
cholaenoides, Helictotrichon longifolinm , Merxmuellera
stricta, Pentaschistis exserta, P. setifolia , Setaria obscura
and Sporobolus pectinatus). The family is less speciose to
the south and accounts for only 3% of the diversity on the
Langeberg, where fynbos dominates (Table 5).
The apparent disparity between Table 2 and 3 with
respect to the position of the Fabaceae is the result of the
Liliaceae s.l. being treated as a single entity in Table 3
and being reduced to its component families in Table 2.
This modification allows direct comparison with Hilliard
(1978) and Ross (1972) which deal with Liliaceae s.l. In
Table 2, Fabaceae is fourth on the list of species contrib-
utors. Hilliard & Burtt (1987) state that Fabaceae is the
TABLE 3. — The nine largest families and their contribution to the
floras of Mahwaqa Mountain, the southern Drakensberg and
KwaZulu-Natal (with Scrophulariaceae including Selaginaceae
and Liliaceae s.l.)
Mahwaqa Mountain Southern KwaZulu-
Drakensberg Natal
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
103
TABLE 4. — Genera which contribute 10 or more species to the flora of
Mahwaqa Mountain (M) in order of numerical importance and
in relation to the floras of the southern Drakensberg (SD),
Amatola Mountains (A), Langeberg (L), Cape Point (CP), and
Umtamvuna Nature Reserve (UNR)
second most important species contributor to the
KwaZulu-Natal flora (Table 3). The lower diversity of
this family on the mountain is partly due to absence of
tropical tree and shrub species in the elevated grasslands.
The disparity is borne out by comparison between
Mahwaqa Mountain and Umtamvuna Nature Reserve
(Table 5). Four endemics to the southern Drakensberg,
Argyrolobium nigrescens, A. sericosemium, Indigofera
woodii and Lotononis virgata, occur on the mountain.
The Orchidaceae is well represented in mountain flo-
ras of the eastern seaboard and is the third most speciose
family on Mahwaqa Mountain (85 taxa) and the fourth
most in the southern Drakensberg (83 spp.). Only two of
the Mahwaqa species are narrow endemics, Huttonaea
oreophila and Pterygodium cooperi. The diversity of
orchids on Mahwaqa and in the southern Drakensberg is
higher than in any of the compared areas (Tables 3-5).
Liliaceae sd. contributes 5.8% or 60 spp. to the
Mahwaqa flora (Table 3), which correlates closely with
the family’s importance in the southern Drakensberg
(6.3% or 84 spp.) and for the flora of KwaZulu-Natal
(247 species or 5.1%). When broken down into compo-
nent families ( sensu Dahlgren et al. 1985) the
Hyacinthaceae is best represented in the southern
Drakensberg with 34 species (Hilliard & Burtt 1987).
This pattern is repeated on Mahwaqa Mountain where 29
species of Hyacinthaceae occur (2.7%). The Asphode-
laceae is also well represented on the mountain with 23
species compared with the 19 species listed by Hilliard &
Burtt (1987) for the southern Drakensberg. In Kniphofia ,
a number of species are outlined as narrow endemics by
Codd (1968) and of these K. ichopensis, K. brachy-
stachya and K. fdirosa occur on Mahwaqa Mountain.
The area is also the northern limit of K. parviflora.
The Iridaceae contributes a large number of species
(43 or 4%) to the Mahwaqa Mountain flora (Table 2).
The family has a peak of diversity in the mountains and
winter rainfall areas of sub-Saharan Africa (Goldblatt
1983) (Table 4). The Iridaceae is the seventh largest fam-
ily in the southern Drakensberg (65 or 4.9 %) (Hilliard &
Burtt 1987) and similar levels of diversity are seen on the
Langeberg (5%) (McDonald 1999). Five of the species
recorded from Mahwaqa are endemic to the southern
Drakensberg, Moraea hiemalis , M. unibracteata, M.
carnea (Goldblatt 1986), Gladiolus parvulus (Goldblatt
& Manning 1998) and Hesperantha grandiflora (Hilliard
& Burtt 1986).
Scrophulariaceae (including Selaginaceae) are impor-
tant in the southern Drakensberg where they constitute
5.9% of the species (Hilliard & Burtt 1987). On Mahwaqa
the family is slightly less important, contributing 4.2% or
44 species which is comparable to that for KwaZulu-
Natal at 3.6% (Hilliard & Burtt 1987). This diversity
includes three narrowly distributed species, Manulea
florifera, Nemesia silvatica and Diascia megathura.
The Asclepiadaceae, now included under Apocynaceae
(Leistner 2000), display similar levels of diversity on
Mahwaqa and in the southern Drakensberg (3.1% and
3.4% respectively), but these levels are considerably
lower than the diversity in KwaZulu-Natal (Ross 1972).
This is probably due to the exclusion of tropical and
xerophytic species from the montane habitats. A number
of mesic asclepiads appear to have speciated in the Natal
Drakensberg and of these Aspidonepsis flava, A. reenen-
sis, A. diploglossa and Schizoglossum elingue subsp.
elingue have been recorded on the Mountain. A compar-
ison with floristic inventories to the south, show that the
Asclepiadaceae are insignificant in their contribution to
the flora of the Langeberg.
A few other near-endemic species occur in the less
diverse families on the mountain. These include: Peuce-
danum thodei (Apiaceae), Geranium pulchrum (Gera-
niaceae), Gnidia renniana (Thymelaeaceae), Gymno-
sporia uniflora subsp. nov. (M. Jordaan pers. comm.)
(Celestraceae), Afrop’sonia glochidiata (Boraginaceae),
TABLE 5. — The ten most speciose families on Mahwaqa Mountain and their relative diversity on the Amatola Mountains (Phillipson 1987),
Langeberg (McDonald 1999), Cape Point (Taylor 1985) and Umtamvuna Nature Reserve (Abbott et al. 2000)
104
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Satureja reptans and Hemizygia cinerea (Lamiaceae),
Wahlenbergia pallidiflora (Campanulaceae), Cyphia
natal ensis (Lobeliaceae).
Table 4 shows that eight genera have 10 species or
more, with Senecio and Helichrysum contributing 37 and
39 species respectively.
It is clear from the data above that Mahwaqa
Mountain supports a highly diverse flora and is a strong
candidate for long-term preservation. The area approach-
es the Amatola and the Langeberg Mountains in terms of
its a-diversity despite being a fraction of the land area.
In addition, a-diversity is comparable to that of
Umtamvuna Nature Reserve of the Pondoland Centre,
which is renowned for its phytodiversity (Van Wyk 1990,
1994). The levels of endemism are considerably lower
than those of the Langeberg and the Pondoland Centre
although numerous southern Drakensberg endemics
occur on the mountain.
One of the most insidious threats to the diversity of
indigenous grasslands, is their invasion by opportunist
seedlings from timber plantations. This threat is in the
form of timber species, such as eucalypts and pines, as
well as weeds from these plantations. Changing burning
regimes, due to the high risk that fire poses to timber
plantations, allow the proliferation of woody species
which are intolerant of fire. Pyrophytes, which constitute
the bulk of the indigenous vegetation, are rapidly lost
from these altered moribund habitats. The ubiquitous and
irresponsible degradation of grasslands in KwaZulu-
Natal is a serious indictment on agroforestry in the
province. Hopefully the vegetation of Mahwaqa
Mountain will not succumb to the invasion of weeds and
opportunist seedlings from the surrounding plantations.
SYSTEMATIC LIST
The angiosperm nomenclature is arranged according
to Arnold & De Wet ( 1993), Leistner (2000), and species
are arranged alphabetically within each genus. The
nomenclature of Asparagaceae follows Fellingham &
Meyer (1995). Synonyms in italics in brackets follow
unpublished PRECIS lists.
Putative hybrids and subspecific taxa are excluded
from the above tables but are included in the checklist.
Most of the cited vouchers are housed in the Natal
University Herbarium (NU), Pietermaritzburg and at the
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE). Voucher slides of
the bryophytes are housed at NU.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our sincere thanks are extended to Mrs I. Johnson for
her assistance, Mr K. Cooper and Mr R. Scott-Shaw for
their contributions to the species list. The bryophyte
determinations were kindly provided by Dr S. Perold,
Dr J. van Rooy and F. Brusse. The National Botanical
Institute is thanked for the use of data from the National
Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE) Computerised Information
System (PRECIS). Lastly we would like to thank the ref-
erees for their valuable suggestions.
REFERENCES
ABBOTT, A.. VAN WYK, A.E., JOHNSON. D.N. & SCOTT-SHAW,
R. 2000. Checklist of the macrofungi, lichens, bryophytes and vas-
cular plants of the Umtamvuna Nature Reserve, Lammergeyer 46:
1-69.
ACOCKS, J.PH 1988. Veld types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
ADAMSON. R.S. & SALTER, T.M. 1950. Flora of the Cape Penin-
sula. Juta, Cape Town.
ARNOLD. T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds). 1993. Plants of southern
Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 62.
CODD. L.E. 1968. The South African species of Kniphofia. Bothalia 9.
COWLING, R.M. & HILTON-TAYLOR. C. 1997. Phytogeography,
flora and endemism. In R.M. Cowling, D.M. Richardson & S.M.
Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
DAHLGREN. R.M.T., CLIFFORD, H.T. & YEO. P.F. 1985. The fami-
lies of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution, and taxonomy.
Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
DEALL, G.B. & BACKER. A.P. 1989. The vegetation ecology of the
Eastern Transvaal Escarpment in the Sabie area. 3. Annotated
checklist. Bothalia 19: 91-110.
DE DALLA TORRE. C.G. & HARMS, H. 1907. Genera Siphonoga-
marum ad systema Engleranum conscripta. Engelmann. Lipsiae.
FELLINGHAM. A.C. & MEYER, N.L. 1995. New combinations and
a complete list of Asparagus species in southern Africa
(Asparagaceae). Bothalia 25: 205-209.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON, L„ KOEKEMOER, M„ SMOOK,
L„ BARKER, N.P., ANDERSON, H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J. 1990.
Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 58.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1983. Geography of Iridaceae in Africa. Bothalia 14:
559-564.
GOLDBLATT. P. 1986. The moraeas of southern Africa. Annals of the
Kirstenhosch Botanic Gardens 14.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING. J.C. 1998. Gladiolus in southern
Africa. Femwood Press. Vlaeberg.
HILLIARD, O. M. 1978. The geographical distribution of Compositae
native to Natal. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh
36: 407-425.
HILLIARD. O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1986. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: XII. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 43: 1 89-228.
HILLIARD. O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1987. The botany of the Natal
Drakensberg. Annals of Kirstenboscli Botanic Gardens 15.
LEISTNER, O.A. (ed.). 2000. Seed plants of southern Africa: families
and genera. Strelitzia 10. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
MCDONALD. D.J. 1999. Montane flora of the southern Langeberg.
South Africa: a checklist of the flowering plants and ferns.
Bothalia 29: 119-137.
PEROLD, S.M. 1999. Hepatophyta. Part 1: Marchantiopsida, fasc. 1:
Marchantiidae. Flora of southern Africa. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
PHILIPS, .1. 1973. The agricultural and related development of the
Tugela Basin and its influent surrounds. Natal Town and Regional
Planning Commission, Pietermaritzburg.
PHILLIPSON. P.B. 1987. A checklist of vascular plants of the Amatole
Mountains, eastern Cape Province/Ciskei. Bothalia 17: 237-256.
ROSS, J.M. 1972. Flora of Natal. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 39.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL. R.H. 1994. Biomes of southern
Africa: an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 54.
SCHULZE. R.E. 1982. Agrohydrology and climatology of Natal.
Agricultural Catchments Research Unit. Report No. 14.
SCOTT-SHAW, C.R.. BORQUIN. O. & PORTER, R.N. 1996. Conser-
vation of Acocks' Veld Types in South Africa. Lamergeyer 44: 50-64.
TAKHTAJAN. A. 1986. Floristic regions of the world. University of
California Press, Berkeley.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1985. An analysis of the flowering plants and ferns of
the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. South African Journal of
Botany 51: 1-13.
VAN OUDTSHOORN, F. 1992. Guide to grasses of South Africa.
Briza Publications, Pretoria..
VAN WYK, A.E. 1990. The sandstone regions of Natal and Pondoland:
remarkable centres of endemism. Palaeoecologv of Africa 21:
243-257.
Bothalia 32. 1 (2002)
105
VAN WYK, A.E. 1994. Maputaland-Pondoland Region. In S.D. Davis,
V.H. Heywood & A.C. Hamilton, Centres of plant diversity. A
guide and strategy for their conservation, vol. 1: 227—235. IUCN
Publications Unit. Cambridge.
VAN WYK. B-E.. VAN WYK. C.M. & NOVELLIE. PA. 1988. Flora
of the Zuurberg National Park. 2. An annotated checklist of ferns
and seed plants. Bothalia 18: 221-232.
WESTFALL. R.H.. VAN ROOYEN. N. & THERON. G.K. 1986. The
plant ecology of the farm Groothoek, Thabazimbi District. III. An
annotated checklist. Bothalia 16: 77-82.
CHECKLIST
* Naturalized weeds. Italicized names in square brackets are synonyms in PRECIS.
HEPATOPHYTA PTERIDOPHYTA
RICCIACEAE
Riccia stricta (Lindenb.) Perold
MARCH ANTIACEAE
Marchantia cf. polymorpha L.
AYTONIACEAE
Asterella sp.
Plagiochasma sp.
PLAGIOCH1LACEAE
Plagiochila sp.
LOPHOCOLEACEAE
Lophocolea sp.
ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA
ANTHOCEROTACEAE
Anthoceros sp.
BRYOPHYTA
FISSIDENTACEAE
Fissidens glaucescens Homsch.
DITRICHACEAE
Ditrichum brachypodum (Miill.Hal.) Broth.
DICRANACEAE
Campylopus pilifer Brid.
POTTIACEAE
Barbula crinita Schultz
Trichostomum brachydontium Bruch
Bryoerythrophyllum jamesonii (Taylor) H. A. Crum
FUNARIACEAE
Funaria hygrometrica Hedw.
BRYACEAE
Anomobryum filiforme (Dicks.) Husn.
Bryum
alpinum Huds. ex With.
pseudotriquetrum (Hedw.) P.Gaertn., B.Mey. & Scherb.
pycnophyllum (Dixon) Mohamed
Mielichhoferia
bryoides (Harv.) Wijk & Margacl.
subnuda Sim
Rhodobryum roseum (Hedw.) Limpr.
MNIACEAE
Plagiomnium rhynchophorum (Hook.) T.J.Kop.
BARTRAMIACEAE
Bartramia hampeana Miill.Hal.
Philonotis
africana ( Miill.Hal .) Rehmann ex Paris.
dregeana ( Miill.Hal .) A. Jaeger
falcata (Hook.) Mitt.
ORTHOTRICHACEAE
Macrocoma tenuis (Hook. & Grev.) Vitt
LESKEACEAE
Pseudoleskeopsis sp.
THUIDIACEAE
Haplocladium sp.
Thuidium sp.
HYPNACEAE
Hypnum cupressiforme Hedw.
POLYTRICHACEAE
Atrichum androgynum (Miill.Hal.) A. Jaeger
POLYSTICHACEAE
Oligotrichum cf. afrolaevigatum (Dixon) G.L.Sm.
LYCOPODIACEAE
Lycopodium
clavatum L.. Rennie 630 NU
verticillatum L.f, Feltham 166 NU
SELAGINELLACEAE
Selaginella
kraussiana (Kunze) A. Braun ex Kuhn, Edwards 2203 NU
mittenii Baker, Rennie 515 NU
EQUISETACEAE
Equisetum ramosissimum Desf, Rennie 1752 NU
OPHIOGLOSSACEAE
Ophioglossum vulgatum L., Rennie 1766 NU
ANEMIACEAE
Mohria caffrorum (L.) Desv., Rennie 917 NU
GLEICHENIACEAE
Gleichenia umbraculifera (Kunze) T.Moore, Rennie 670 NU
CYATHEACEAE
Cyathea dregei Kunze, Rennie s.n. NU
PTERIDACEAE
Adiantum poiretii Wiksti :, Edwards 1982 NU
Cheilanthes
eckloniana (Kunze) Mett., Rennie 1926 NU
hirta 5vv., Rennie 577 NU
quadripinnata (Forssk.) Kuhn, Rennie 587, 904 NU
Pellaea
calomelanos (Sw.) Link, Rennie 876 NU
pteroides (L.) Prantl, Rennie 904 NU
Pteris
catoptera Kunze, Clarkson s.n. NU
cretica L., Vos 68 NU
POLYPODIACEAE
Loxogramme lanceolata (Sw.) C.Presl, Clarkson s.n. NU
Pleopeltis macrocarpa (Boiy ex Willd.) Kaulfi, Feltham 266 NU
Lepisorus schraderi (Mett.) Citing, Rennie 514 NU
Polypodium
polypodioides (L.) Hitchc. subsp. ecklonii (Kunze) Schelpe,
Clarkson s.n. NU
vulgare L., Rennie 895 NU
*NEPHROLEPIDACEAE
*Nephrolepis undulata (Sw.) J.Sm.. Rennie 895 PRE
ASPLENIACEAE
Asplenium
adiantum-nigrum L., McBean s.n. NU
aethiopicum (Burm.f.) Beclt., Rennie 916 NU
boltonii Hook, ex Schelpe, Clarkson s.n. NU
erectum Bory ex Willd., Edwards 2027 NU
lobatum Pappe & Rawson, Clarkson s.n. NU
monanthes L., Feltham 300 NU
protensum Schrad., Clarkson s.n. NU
rutifolium (P.J.Bergius) Kunze, Shuter s.n. NU
splendens Kunze, Feltham 279 NU
stoloniferum Bory, Feltham 293 NU
theciferum (Kunth) Mett. var. concinnum (Schrad.) Schelpe, Clark-
son s.n. NU
varians Hook. & Grev. subsp. fimbriatum (Kunze) Schelpe,
Clarkson s.n. NU
THELYPTER1DACEAE
Thelypteris pozoi (Lag.) C.V.Morton, Clarkson 194 NU
ATHYRIACEAE
Athyrium schimperi Moug. ex Fee, Clarkson s.n. NU
DRYOPTER1DACEAE
Cystopteris fragilis (L.) Bernh., Clarkson s.n. NU
106
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Dryopteris
athamantica (Kunze) Kuntze, Rennie 1311 NU
inaequalis (Schltdl.) Kuntze, Edwards 2210 NU
Polystichum
luctuosum (Kunze) Moore, Rennie 546\ Edwards 1943 NU
pungens (Kaulf.) C.Presl, Edwards 1942 NU
transvaalense N.C. Anthony, Rennie 1441 NU
LOMARIOPSIDACEAE
Elaphoglossum
acrostichoides (Hook. & Grew ) Schelpe, Rennie 1512 NU, PRE
drakensbergense Schelpe, Feltham 1 19 NU
ASPID1ACEAE
Cyrtomium caryotideum (Hook. & Grew) C.Presl var. micropterum
(Kunze) C.Chr., Feltham 270 NU
Woodsia montevidensis (Spreng.) Hieron. var. burgessiana (Gerrard ex
Hook. & Baker) Schelpe, Rennie 1685 NU
BLECHNACEAE
Blechnum
attennuatum (Sw.) Mett. var. giganteum (Kaulf.) Bonap., Clarkson
s.n. NU
inflexum (Kunze) Kuhn, Feltham 296 NU
GYMNOSPERMAE
PODOCARPACEAE
Podocarpus
falcatus (Thunb.) R.Br. ex Mirb., Feltham 222 NU
henkelii Stapf ex Dallim. & Jacks., Rennie 1067 NU
latifolius (Thunb.) R.Br. ex Mirb., Feltham 227 NU
ANGIOSPERMAE-MONOCOTYLEDONAE
TYPHACEAE
Typha capensis (Rohrb.) N.E.Be, Rennie 2529 NU
APONOGETONACEAE
Aponogeton junceus Lehm. ex Scliltdl., Rennie 240 NU
POACEAE
Hemarthria altissima (Pair.) Stapf & C.E.Hubb., Rennie 1760 PRE
Elionurus muticus (Spreng.) Kunth, Rennie 946 NU
Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch., Rennie 1533 PRE
Microstegium nudum (Trin.) A. Camus, Feltham 288 NU
Miscanthus capensis (Nees) Anderss., Rennie 1557 PRE
Eulalia villosa (Thunb.) Nees, Rennie 1539 PRE
Andropogon
amethystinus Steud., Rennie 1359 NU
appendiculatus Nees, Feltham 15a NU
eucomus Nees, Rennie 1771 NU
Cymbopogon
plurinodis (Stapf) Stapf ex Burtt Davy, Feltham 67 NU
validus (Stapf) Stapf ex Burtt Davy, Rennie 1586 PRE
Hyparrhenia
dregeana (Nees) Stapf, Rennie 1757 PRE
hirta (L.) Stapf, Rennie 1751 PRE
Monocymbium ceresiiforme (Nees) Stapf, Rennie 1645 PRE
Trachypogon spicatus (L.f.) Kuntze, Rennie 1656 NU, PRE
Heteropogon contortus (L.) Roem. & Schult., Feltham 22 NU
Diheteropogon
amplectens (Nees) Clayton, Rennie 1599 NU
filifolius (Nees) Clayton, Rennie 1547 PRE
Themeda triandra Forssk., Rennie 1552 PRE
Digitaria tricholaenoides Stapf, Rennie 1531 PRE
Alloteropsis semialata (R.Br.) Hitchc. subsp. eckloniana (Nees) Gibbs-
Russ., Rennie 1530 PRE
Brachiaria serrata (Thunb.) Stapf, Rennie 1532 PRE
Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauw, Rennie 1683 NU
Oplismenus hirtellus (L.) PBeauv., Edwards 1963 NU
Panicum
aequinerve Nees, Edwards 2009 NU
ecklonii Nees, Feltham 172 NU
natalense Hochst., Rennie 1518 PRE; Carbutt 453 NU
schinzii Hack., Rennie 1627 PRE
subalbidum Kunth, Rennie 1434 NU
Setaria
incrassata (Hochst.) Hack., Rennie 1344 NU
nigrirostris (Nees) T. Durand & Schinz, Rennie 1551 PRE
obscura de Wit, Rennie 1358 NU
pallide-fusca (Schumach.) Stapf & C.E.Hubb., Rennie 1626 PRE
Melinis
nerviglumis ( F ranch .) Zizka, Carbutt 430 NU
repens (Willd.) Zizka subsp. repens, Rennie 1380 NU
Pennisetum
sphacelatum (Nees) T. Durand & Schinz, Carbutt 448 NU
thunbergii Kunth, Rennie 1537 PRE
Leersia hexandra Sw., Rennie 1763 PRE
Ehrharta erecta Lam. var. natalensis Stapf, Rennie 1555 PRE
*Phalaris arundinacea L., Rennie 1701 PRE
Anthoxanthum ecklonii (Nees ex Trin.) Stapf, Rennie 1740 PRE;
Carbutt 451 NU
Tristachya leucothrix Nees, Rennie 1543 PRE
Loudetia
simplex (Nees) C.E.Hubb., Rennie 1774 PRE
sp., Rennie 1545 PRE
*Holcus lanatus L., Feltham 220 NU
Helictotrichon
galpinii Schweick., Rennie 1391 NU
longifolium (Nees) Schweick., Rennie 1553 PRE
turgidulum (Stapf) Schweick., Feltham 285 NU
sp., Rennie 1520, 1534 PRE
Merxmuellera stricta (Schrad.) Conert, Rennie 1548 PRE
Pentaschistis
exserta H.P.Linder, Rennie 1568 NU
natalensis Stapf, Rennie 1648 NU, PRE
oreodoxa Schweick.. Rennie 1568 PRE
setifolia (Thunb.) McClean, Rennie 1522 NU, PRE
tysonii Stapf, Carbutt 449 NU
Phragmites australis (Caw) Steud., Rennie 1430 NU
Agrostis
barbuligera Stapf var. barbuligera, Rennie 1738 PRE
bergiana Trin. var. bergiana, Feltham 314 NU
continuata Stapf, Rennie 1567 NU, PRE
lachnantha Nees var. lachnantha, Rennie 1566 PRE
Aristida junciformis Trin. & Rupr.
subsp. galpinii (Stapf) De Winter. Rennie 1544 PRE
subsp. junciformis, Rennie 1431 NU
Stipa dregeana Steud.. Edwards 2033 NU
Sporobolus
africanus (Poir.) Robyns <& Tournay. Rennie 1628 NU, PRE
centrifugus (Trin.) Nees,
macranthelus Chiow,
pectinatus Hack.. Rennie 1403 NU, 1546 PRE
pyramidalis P.Beauw, Feltham 10 NU
Eragrostis
caesia Stapf, Feltham 414 NU
capensis (Thunb.) Trin., Rennie 1540 PRE
curvula (Schrad.) Nees. Rennie 1392a NU; Vorster 228 PRE
plana Nees, Rennie 1 772 PRE
planiculmis Nees, Rennie 1629 NU
racemosa (Thunb.) Steud. Rennie 1418 NU, 1529 PRE
Rendlia altera (Rendle) Chiow, Feltham 16 NU
Microchloa caffra Nees., Edwards 2227 NU
Cynodon hirsutus Stent. Rennie 1406 NU, 1753 PRE
Harpochloa falx (L.f.) Kuntze. Rennie 941 NU, 1550 PRE
Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. subsp. africana (Kent). -O'Byrne) Hilu
& De Wet, Rennie 1756 PRE
Styppeiochloa gynoglossa (Gooss.) De Winter. Feltham 9 NU
Koeleria capensis (Steud.) Nees, Rennie 1523 PRE
* Dactyl is glomerata L., Rennie 1699 PRE
Stiburus alopecuroides (Hack.) Stapf, Feltham 415 NU
Poa binata Nees, Rennie 606 NU
Festuca
caprina Nees, Feltham 70 NU
costata Nees, Feltham 69 NU
scabra Vahl, Rennie 1524 NU, PRE
*Vulpia myuros (L.) C.C.Gniel., Rennie 1389 NU
B rom us
*catharticus Vahl, Rennie 1345 NU, 1536 PRE
leptoclados Nees. Rennie 1561
speciosus Nees, A., Rennie’s list
Brachypodium flexum Nees, Rennie 1765 NU, PRE
CYPERACEAE
Ascolepis capensis (Kunth) Rid!., Rennie 1697 PRE
Cyperus
albostriatus Schrad., Edwards 1983 NU
esculentus L., Rennie 1700 PRE
fastigiatus Rottb., Rennie 1342 PRE
obtusiflorus Vahl var. sphaerocephalus (Vahl) Kiik., Feltham 118 NU
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
107
Cyperus (cont.)
rupestris Kunth var. rupestris, Edw ards 2060 NU
semitrifidus Schrad. var. semitrifidus. Feltham 44 NU
Pycreus
betschuanus (Boeck.) C.B. Clarke, Rennie 1690 PRE
flavescens (L.) Rchb.. Feltliam 190 NU
oakfortensis C.B. Clarke, Rennie 1413 NU
Mariscus
congestus (Vahl) C.B. Clarke. Rennie 1037 NU
solidus l Kunth.) Vorster, Edwards 2202 NU
Ficinia stolonifera Boeck.. Rennie s.n.
Fuirena pubescens (Poir.) Kunth, Rennie 1277 NU, 1554 PRE
Scirpus falsus C.B. Clarke. Feltham 180 NU
Isolepis
costata A. Rich. var. macra (Boeck.) B.L.Burtt, Rennie s.n.
fluitans (L.) R.Br., Rennie 1353 NU
Bulbostylis
humilis (Kunth) C.B. Clarke, Feltham 343 NU
oritrephes (Ridl.) C.B. Clarke. Rennie 1535 PRE
scleropus C.B. Clarke, Rennie s.n. NU
Rhynchospora brownii Roem. & Schult., Rennie s.n.
Schoenoxiphium
rufum Nees, Rennie 1029 NU
schweickerdtii Merxm. & Podlech. Rennie 1646 NU. PRE
Carex
acutiformis Ehrh., Rennie 1145 NU
mossii Nelmes, Edw ards 2228 NU
ARACEAE
Zantedeschia
aethiopica (L.) Spreng., Rennie 1020 NU
albomaculata (Hook.) Baill, Rennie 1001 NU
XYR1DACEAE
Xyris
capensis Thunb.. Feltham 148 NU
gerrardii N.E.Be, Feltham 239 NU
ERIOCAULACEAE
Eriocaulon dregei Hochst. var. sonderianum (Koem.) Oberm., Rennie
1350 NU
COMMELINACEAE
Commelina africana L, Feltham 198 NU
Cyanotis speciosa (L.f.) Hassk., Rennie 625 NU
JUNCACEAE
Juncus
effusus F.. Rennie 1041 NU
exsertus Buchen., Feltham 334 NU
oxycarpus E. Mew ex Kunth. Rennie 1354 NU, 1693 PRE
COLCHICACEAE
Sandersonia aurantiaca Hook., Feltham 86 NU
Androcymbium longipes Baker , Rennie 2524 NU
Wurmbea
angustifolia B.Nord.. Feltham 48 NU
elatior B.Nord.. Rennie 1241 NU
Littonia modesta Hook., Feltham 79 NU
ASPHODELACEAE
Bulbine
capitata Poelln., Rennie 1195 NU
favosa (Thunb.) Schult. & Schult. f. Rennie 870 NU
filifolia Baker. Rennie 498 E. NU
Trachyandra
asperata Kunth, Rennie 455 NU
gerrardii (Baker) Obenn.. Rennie 456 NU
saltii (Baker) Oberm., Rennie 608 NU
Kniphofia
baurii Baker, Rennie 732 NU
brachystachya (Zahlbr.) Codd, Rennie 486 NU
fibrosa Baker. Rennie 1316 NU, 1635 PRE
fluviatalis Codd, Rennie 1862 NU
galpinii Baker, Rennie 1392 NU
gracilis Harv. ex Baker, Edwards 1051 NU
ichopensis Baker ex Schinz, Rennie 675 NU
laxiflora Kunth. W. Marais 829 PRE
northiae Baker, Rennie 786 NU
parviflora Kunth. Rennie 1044 NU; Edwards 2190 NU
porphyrantha Baker. Rennie 686 NU
triangularis Kunth subsp. triangularis, W. Marais 830 PRE
sp., Rennie 1632a, 1634 PRE
Aloe
ecklonis Salm-Dyck, Rennie 214 NU
ferox Mill., Rennie 396 NU
maculata All., Rennie 404 NU
ANTHERICACEAE
Chlorophytum
acutum (C.H. Wright) Nordal, Feltham 206 NEE Rennie 1734 PRE
[Anthericum acutum ]
comosum (Thunb.) Jacq., Rennie 1122 NU
cooperi (Baker) Nordal, Rennie 787 NU [Anthericum cooperi]
krookianum Zahlbr.. Edwards 2052 NU
HYACINTHACEAE
Bowiea volubilis Harv. ex Hook.f. Rennie 736; Edwards 1934 NU
Albuca
fastigiata (L.f.) Dry and., Rennie 533 NU
humilis Baker, Rennie 276 NU
polyphylla Baker, Rennie 1305 NU
rupestris Hilliard & B.F.Burtt, Rennie 225 NU
setosa Jacq., Rennie 1373 NU
xanthocodon Hilliard & B.F.Burtt, Rennie 35 NU
Urginea
calcarata (Baker) Hilliard & B.F.Burtt, Rennie 598 NU
capitata (Hook.) Baker, Rennie 45 NU
macrocentra Baker, Rennie 1291 NU
multisetosa Baker, Rennie 137 NU
tenella Baker, Rennie 1882 NU
Drimia
robusta Baker. Rennie 44 NU
sphaerocephala Baker, Rennie 1192 NU
Dipcadi
gracillimum Baker, Rennie 243 NU
viride (L.) Moench, Feltham 199 NU
Scilla
natalensis Planch., Rennie 142 NU
nervosa (Burch. ) Jessop. Rennie 253 NU
Ledebouria
cooperi (Hook.f.) Jessop, Rennie 80 NU
ovatifolia (Baker) Jessop, Rennie 78 NU
Eucomis
autumnalis (Mill.) Chitt. subsp. clavata (Baker) Revneke, Rennie 810
NU
bicolor Baker, Rennie 742 NU
comosa ( Houtt .) Wehrh. var. comosa, Rennie 809 NU
montana Compton, Rennie s.n. NU
Ornithogalum
graminifolium Thunb.. Medley Wood 4567 PRE
juncifolium Jacq., Feltham 182a NU
paludosum Baker, Rennie 1102 NU
sp. cf. graminifolium Thunb., Feltham 777NU
Drimiopsis lachenalioides (Baker) Jessop, Rennie 234 NU
ERIOSPERMACEAE
Eriospermum
natalense Baker. Rennie 1289 NU
omithogaloides Baker, Feltham 182 NU
sprengerianum Schinz , Rennie 1289 NU
AGAPANTHACEAE
Agapanthus campanulatus Leighton, Feltham 407 NU
ALLIACEAE
Tulbaghia
acutiloba Harv., Rennie 781 NU
leucantha Baker, Feltham 187 NU
ludwigiana Harv., Rennie 842 NU
ASPARAGACEAE
Asparagus
africanus Lam., Rennie 595 NU [Protasparagus africanus (Lam.)
Oberm.]
virgatus Baker Feltham 355 NU [Protasparagus virgatus (Baker)
Oberm.]
ramosissimum Baker, Rennie 716 NU [Myrsiphyllum ramosissimum
(Baker) Oberm.]
LUZURIAGACEAE
Behnia reticulata (Thunb.) Didr., Feltham 234 NU
AMARYLLIDACEAE
Haemanthus humilis Jacq. subsp. hirsutus (Baker) Snijman, Rennie
618 NU
Scadoxus puniceus (L.) Friis & Nordal, Rennie 839 NU
108
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Nerine appendiculata Baker , Fejmam 406 NU
Brunsvigia
grandiflora Lindl. , Rennie 925 NU
natalensis Baker, Rennie 808 NU
undulata F.M.Leight.. Rennie 1123 NU
Apodolirion buchananii Baker, Rennie 2551 NU
Cyrtanthus
breviflorus Harv., Rennie 600 NU
tuckii Baker, Rennie 597 NU
HYPOXIDACEAE
Empodium monophyllum (Net) B.L.Burtt, Rennie 79 NU
Hypoxis
filiformis Baker, Feltliam 169 NU
galpinii Baker, Edwards 2027 NU
gerrardii Baker, Rennie 91 NU
hemerocallidea Fisch. & C.A.Mey., Rennie 1860 NU
iridifolia Baker, Rennie 610 NU
lata Nel. Rennie 1841 NU
parvula Baker var. parvula, Feltliam 140 NU
Rhodohypoxis
baurii (Baker) Nel
var. platypetala (Baker) Nel, Rennie 73 NU
var. platypetala x R. milloides (putative hybrid), Rennie 70 NU
milloides (Baker) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 236 NU
VELLOZIACEAE
Xerophyta viscosa Baker, Rennie 451 NU
DIOSCOREACEAE
Dioscorea
dregeana (Kunth) T.Durand & Schinz, Edwards 1955 NU
rupicola Kunth, Rennie 2526 NU
tysonii Baker, Rennie 1585 NU
1RIDACEAE
Moraea
brevistyla (Goldblatt) Goldblatt, Rennie 1590 NU
carnea Goldblatt, Rennie 1499 NU
hiemalis Goldblatt, Rennie 572 NU
huttonii (Baker) Oberm., Rennie 836 NU
inclinata Goldblatt, Rennie 893 NU
modesta Killick, Rennie 769 NU
spathulata (L.f.) Klatt, Rennie 1859 NU
stricta Baker, Rennie 749 NU
trifida R.C. Foster, Rennie 1248 NU
unibracteata Goldblatt, Rennie 1348 NU
Diete.s iridioides (L.) Sweet ex Klatt, Edwards 2056 NU
Aristea
cognata N.E.Br. ex Weim., Feltliam 49 NU
woodii N.E.Br., Feltliam 420 NU
Hesperantha
baurii Baker. Edwards 1999 NU
glareosa Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 1215 NU
grandiflora G.J. Lewis, Rennie 567 NU
hygrophila Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 731 NU
tysonii Baker , Rennie 409 NU
vernalis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 751 NU
Dierama
argyreum L.Bolus, Rennie 433 NU
dissimile Hilliard, Rennie 1251 NU
dracomontanuin Hilliard , Rennie 1152 NU
galpinii N.E.Br., Rennie 847 NU
latifolium N.E.Br., Rennie 971 NU
pauciflorum N.E.Br., Feltliam 23 NU
trichorhizum (Baker) N.E.Br., Rennie 1146 NU
Tritonia lineata (Salisb.) Ker Gawk, Rennie 47 NU
Crocosmia
aurea (Pappe ex Hook.) Plancli., Feltliam 405 NU
paniculata (Klatt) Goldblatt, Rennie 530 NU
pottsii (MacNab ex Baker) N.E.Br.. Rennie 532 NU
Gladiolus
crassifolius Baker, Rennie 346 NU
dalenii Van Geel, Edwards 2057 NU
ecklonii Lelmi., Rennie 260 NU
longicollis Baker, Rennie 710 NU
oppositiflorus Herb. Rennie 531 NU \G. oppositiflorus Herb, subsp.
salmoneus (Baker) Oberm. )
papilio Hook.f, Rennie 264 NU
parvulus Sell In:, Rennie 1158 NU
pubigerus G.J. Lewis, Rennie 1252 NU
pugioniformis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 773 NU
sericiovillosus Hook.f., Edwards 2014 NU
Watsonia
densiflora Baker. Rennie 1989 NU
lepida N.E.Br. Rennie 1151 NU
Freesia laxa (Thunb.) Goldblatt & J.C. Manning [Anomatheca laxa
(Thunb.) Goldblatt]
ORCHIDACEAE
Stenoglottis fimbriata Lindl., Edwards 2053 NU
Holothrix scopularia (Lindl.) Rchb.fi, Rennie 148 NU
Huttonaea
grandiflora (Schltr.) Rolfe, Rennie 1136 NU
oreophila Schltr.. Rennie 1010 NU
pulchra Harv.. Rennie 796 NU
Habenaria
ciliosa Lindl.. Rennie 2502 NU
dives Rchb.fi., Feltliam 117 NU
dregeana Lindl., O'Connor s.n. NU
epipactidea Rchb.fi.. Rennie 903 NU
laevigata Lindl., Rennie 634 NU
Iithophila Schltr., Rennie 746 NU
pseudociliosa Schelpe ex J.C. Manning, O'Connor s.n. NU
schimperiana Hochst. ex A. Rich., Rennie 799 NU
tysonii Bolus, Rennie 1303 NU
Bonatea bracteata G.J. McDonald & McMurtry, Rennie 1301 NU [B.
densiflora Sond.]
Brachycorythis ovata Lindl, Rennie 521 NU
Satyrium
bracteatum (L.f.) Thunb.. Rennie 1285 NU
cristatum Sond.
var. cristatum Sond., Feltliam 108 NU
var. Iongilabiatum A.V.Hall, Edwards 2032 NU
hallackii Bolus subsp. ocellatum (Bolus) A.V.Hall, Rennie 1084 NU
ligulatum Lindl, Rennie 314 NU
longicauda Lindl, Feltliam 99 NU
macrophyllum Lincll , Rennie 371 NU
neglectum Schltr., Rennie 1298 NU
parviflorum Sw., Rennie 280 NU
Schizochilus
angustifolius Rolfe, Feltliam 109 NU
flexuosus Harv. ex Rolfe, W. Marais 1454 PRE
zeyheri Sond., Rennie 730 NU
Brownleea
galpinii Bolus
subsp. galpinii, Rennie 348 NU
subsp. major (Bolus) H.P.Linder, Rennie 820 NU
parviflora Harv. ex Lindl, Rennie 1341 NU
Disa
aconitoides Sond., Rennie 244 NU
brevicornis (Lindl) Bolus, Rennie 1087 NU
cephalotes Rchb.fi., Rennie 1304 NU
chrysostachya Sw., Rennie 725 NU
cooperi Rchb.fi., Feltliam 115 NU
crassicornis Lindl, Rennie 1711 NU
fragrans Schltr, McClean 229 PRE
oreophila Bolus, Edwards 2004 NU
patula Sond. var. transvaalensis Summerh., Rennie 1834 NU
pulchra Sond., Rennie 296 NU
rhodantha Schltr., Rennie 1191 NU
scullyi Bolus, Rennie 1684 NU
stachyoides Rchb.fi., Feltliam 110 NU
stricta Sond., Rennie 1370 NU
thodei Schltr. ex Kraenzl., Rennie 1190 NU
versicolor Rchb.fi, Rennie 901 NU
Disperis
cardiophora Harv., Rennie 7797 NU
concinna Schltr, Rennie 729
cooperi Harv, A. Rennie’s list
fanniniae Harv, Rennie 537 NU
lindleyana Rchb.fi, Rennie 1768 NU
renibractea ScfwR, Feltliam 101 NU
stenopleclron Rchb.fi., Feltliam 200 NU
tysonii Bolus, Rennie 831 NU
wealii Rchb.fi., Rennie 729 NU
Pterygodium
cooperi Rolfe, Edwards 1995 NU
leucanthum Bolus. Rennie 888 NU
magnum Rchb.fi. Rennie 798 NU
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
109
Corycium
dracomontanum Parkman <£ Schelpe,
nigrescens Scmd., Rennie 295 NU
Liparis bowkeri Har\>., Edwards 1931 NU
Polystachya ottoniana Rchb.f, Edwards 2023 NU
Eulophia
aculeata (Lf) Spreng. subsp. huttonii (Rolfe) A.V.Hall, Rennie 229 NU
calanthoides Schltr., Rennie 642 NU
clavicomis Lindl.
var. clavicomis, Rennie 77 NU
var. inaequalis (Schltr.) A.V.Hall. Rennie 1727 NU
var. nutans (Sond.) A.V.Hall, Rennie 622 NU
foliosa (Lindl. ) Bolus , Rennie 273 NU
leontoglossa Rchb.f.. Feltham 111 NU
ovalis Lindl. Rennie 1240 NU
tenella Rchb.f. Rennie 174 NU
zeyheriana Sond., Rennie 283 NU
Diaphananthe caffra (Bolus) H.P.Linder, Rennie 1988 NU
Mystacidium
flanaganii (Bolus) Bolus. Rennie 835 NU
gracile (Rchb.f.) Harv. Rennie 1318 NU
Tridactyle tricuspis (Bolus) Schltr.. Edwards 2024 NU
ANGIOSPERMAE-DICOTYLEDONAE
PIPERACEAE
Peperomia
retusa (L.f.) A.Dietr.. Rennie 1968 PRE
tetraphylla (G.Eorst.) Hook. & Am., Rennie 110 NU
SALICACEAE
Salix
*babylonica L. , Rennie 1141 NU
mucronata Thunb. subsp. woodii (Seemen) Immelman, Edwards
2058 NU
ULMACEAE
Celtis africana Burm.f, Feltham 224 NU
MORACEAE
Ficus
burtt-davyi Hutch., Cooper’s list
natalensis Hochst., Cooper’s list
URTICACEAE
Urtica lobulata Blume, Rennie 406 NU
Laportea
alatipes Hook.f, Edwards 2045 NU
peduncularis (Wedd.) Chew., Edwards 2206 NU
Droguetia ambigua Wedd., Edwards 1961 NU
PROTEACEAE
Protea
caffra Meisn., Rennie 840 NU
roupelliae Meisn., Rennie 645 NU
simplex E. Phillips, McClean 215 PRE
S ANTAL ACE AE
Osyridicarpos schimperianus (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) A.DC., Rennie 2499 NU
Thesium
acutissimum A.DC.. Rennie 1562 E
cupressoides A.W.Hill, Feltham 154 NU
imbricatum Thunb.. Rennie 1858 NU
scirpioides A.W.Hill, Rennie 613 NU
zeyheri A.DC., Rennie 25 NU
POLYGONACEAE
Rumex
acetosella L. subsp. angiocarpus (Murb.) Murb., Rennie 33 NU
*crispus L., Rennie 1745 NU
sagittatus Thunb., Rennie 1950 PRE
steudelii Hochst. ex A.Rich., Rennie 1747 NU
woodii N.E.Br., Rennie 432 NU
Persicaria
*nepalensis (Meisn.) H. Gross, Rennie 1105 NU
serrulata (Lag.) Webb & Moq.. Rennie 368 NU
CHENOPODIACEAE
Chenopodium
*album L., Rennie 660 NU
*ambrosioides L., Rennie 1065 NU
AMARANTHACEAE
*Amaranthus hybridus L. subsp. hybridus, Rennie 1789 NU
Cyathula cylindrica Moq., Rennie 1625 NU
*Achyranthes aspera L. var. sicula L. , Rennie 1618 NU
AIZOACEAE
Psammotropha
mucronata (Thunb.) Fenzl var. mucronata. Crouch 281 NU
myriantha Sond., Rennie 441 NU
PHYTOLACCACEAE
Phytolacca
heptandra Retz., Rennie 531 NU
octandra L., Rennie 97 NU
MESEMBRYANTHEMACEAE
Delosperma
alticolum L.Bolus, Rennie 621 NU
galpinii L.Bolus, Rennie 150 NU
obtusum L.Bolus, Rennie 1024 E
PORTULACACEAE
Portuiaca kermesina N.E.Br., Rennie 1023 NU
CARYOPHYLLACEAE
Cerastium
arabidis E.Mey. ex Fenzl, Rennie 87 NU
capense Sond., Rennie 849 NU
indicum Wight & Am., Rennie 364 NU
Drymaria cordata (L.) Willd. ex Roem & Schult. subsp. diandra
(Blume) J.Duke, Edwards 1939 NU
Silene
burchellii Ottli
var. burchellii, Rennie 883 NU
var. latifolia Sond., Rennie 1616 NU
pilosellifolia Cham. & Scliltdl. Rennie 445 NU
undulata Aiton, Rennie 476 NU
Dianthus
basuticus Burn Davy, Rennie 1890 NU
mooiensis F.N. Williams, Rennie 452 NU
RANUNCULACEAE
Anemone caffra Eckl. & Zeyh.. Hilliard & Burtt 7169 NU
Clematis brachiata Thunb., Rennie 927 NU
Ranunculus
baurii Macowan, Rennie 484 NU
meyeri Harv., Rennie 111 NU
multifidus Forssk., Hilliard & Burtt 7171 NU
Thalictrum rhynchocarpum Quart. -Dill. & Rich., Feltham 78 NU
MENISPERMACEAE
Cissampelos torulosa E.Mey. ex Harv, Edwards 1949 NU
TR1MENIACEAE
Xymalos monospora (Harv.) Baill, Edwards 1941 NU
LAURACEAE
Ocotea bullata (Burch.) Baill, Edwards 2059 NU
Cryptocarya
myrtifolia Stapf, Cooper’s list
woodii Engl, Feltham 221 NU
PAPAVERACEAE
*Argemone mexicana L., Rennie 1730 NU
Papaver aculeatum Thunb., Rennie 877 NU
FUMARIACEAE
Cysticapnos pruinosa (Bernh.) Liden, Rennie 1660 NU
BRASSICACEAE
Heliophila rigidiuscula Sond., Rennie 1186 NU
Lepidium schinzii Thell., Hilliard & Burtt 7587 NU
Sisymbrium capense Thunb., Rennie 717 NU
Cardamine
africana L.. Rennie 1050 NU
*impatiens L.. Rennie 785 NU
CAPPARACEAE
Cleome monophylla L., Rennie 1722 NU
DROSERACEAE
Drosera natalensis Diels, Rennie 640 NU
CRASSULACEAE
Kalanchoe thyrsiflora Harv., Rennie 403 NU
Crassula
dependens Bolus, Rennie 277 NU
lanceolata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) End I. ex Walp. subsp. lanceolata, Rennie
1610 NU
natalensis Schonland, Rennie 390 NU
natans Thunb.
110
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Crassula (cont.)
nudicaulis L., Rennie 90 NU
pellucida L.
subsp. alsinoides (Hook.f.) Toelken, Hilliard & Burtt 7609 NU
subsp. brachypetala (Drege ex Harv.) Toelken , Rennie 323 NU
sarcocaulis Eckl. & Zeyh. subsp. rupicola Toelken , Rennie 1115 NU
setulosa Harv.
var. rubra (N.E.Br.) G.D. Rowley, Rennie 816 NU
var. setulosa, Vos 45 NU
umbraticola N.E.Br., Feltham 58 NU
vaginata Eckl. & Zeyh. subsp. vaginata, Rennie 575 NU
PITTOSPORACEAE
Pittosporum viridiflorum Sims, Rennie 2463 NU
HAMAMELIDACEAE
Trichocladus ellipticus Eckl. & Zeyli, Cooper’s list
ROSACEAE
Rubus
ludwigii Eckl. & Zeyh.. Rennie 790 NU
*rigidus Sm., Rennie 1071
*Duchesnea indica ( Andrews ) Focke, Rennie 118 NU
Geum capense Thunb., Rennie 152 NU
Alchemilla
natalensis Engl, Rennie 1210 NU
woodii Kuntze. Hilliard & Burtt 7210 PRE
Agrimonia procera Wall):, Rennie 176 NU
Leucosidea sericea Eckl. & Zeyh., Feltham 268 NU
Cliffortia
linearifolia Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 120 NU
nitidula (Engl.) R.E.Fr. & Th.Fr subsp. pilosa Weim., Feltham 155 NU
Prunus africanus ( Hook.f. ) Kalkm., Edwards 2230 NU
FABACEAE
Acacia
ataxacantha DC., Edwards 2218 NU
*melanoxylon R.Br, Feltham 212 NU
Hoffmanseggia sandersonii (Harv.) Engl., Hilliard & Burtt 7182 NU
Calpurnia
aurea (Alton) Benth. subsp. aurea, Feltham 244 NU
sericea Harv., Rennie 255 NU
Lotononis
camosa (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Benth., Rennie 1184 NU
corymbosa (E.Mey.) Benth., Feltham 133 NE1
eriantha Benth. , Rennie 1423 NU
eriocarpa (E.Mey.) B.-E.van Wyk, Rennie 291 NU [L. biflora (Bolus)
Dummer]
foliosa Bolus, Hilliard & B.L.Burtt 421 NU
laxa Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 1025 NU
lotononoides (Scott Elliot) B.-E.van Wyk, Rennie 709 NU
pulchella (E.Mey.) B.-E.van Wyk, Rennie 1508 PRE
pulchra Dummer, Rennie 1507 PRE
viminea (E.Mey.) B.-E.van Wyk. Rennie 1509 PRE
virgata B.-E.van Wyk, Rennie 1056 NU
Pearsonia grandifolia (Bolus) Polhill, Feltham 354 NU
Melolobium
alpinum Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 1271 NU
microphyllum (L.f.) Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 747 NU
obcordatum Harv., Rennie 247 NU
Argyrolobiurn
amplexicaule Dummer, Edwards 2217 NU
nigrescens Dummer, Edwards 1055 NU
rupestre (E.Mey.) Walp.. Edwards 1091 NU
sericosemium Harms, Edwards 1092 NU
tomentosum (Andrews) Druce, Rennie 245 NU
tuberosum Eckl. & Zeyh., Feltham 421 NU
Medicago laciniata (L.) Mill., Rennie 981 NU
Trifolium burchellianum Sen, Rennie 327 NU
Indigofera
cuneifolia Eckl & Zeyh.,
dregeana E.Mey., Rennie 458 NU
fastigiata E.Mey., Rennie 448 NU
foliosa E.Mey., Rennie 977 NU
hedyantha Eckl & Zeyh., Rennie 293 NU
hi laris Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 270 NU
longebarbata Engl. Rennie 1247 NU
trifolioides Baker f, Rennie 1732 PRE
woodii Bolus, Edwards 1058 NU
Psoralea rhizotoma C.H.Stirt., Rennie 282 NU
Tephrosia
macropoda (E.Mey.) Harv. var. diffusa (E.Mey.) Schrire, Rennie 1104 NU
marginella H.M.L.Forbes , Rennie 910 NU
polystachya E.Mey., Rennie 513 NU
Sutherlandia montana E. Phillips & R. A. Dyer, Rennie 1372 NU
Dalbergia obovata E.Mey.. Cooper's list
Lessertia perennans ( Jacq .) DC. var. perennans, Rennie 419 NU
Zornia capensis Pers., Rennie 496 NU
Desmodium repandum (Vald) DC., Edwards 1944 NU
Dumasia villosa DC., Edwards 2043 NU
Rhynchosia
caribaea (Jacq.) DC., Vos 48 NU
pentheri Schltr., Rennie 1129 NU
reptabunda N.E.Br., Rennie 246 NU
totta (Thunb.) DC., Rennie 989 NU
Eriosema
distinctum N.E.Br, Feltham 134 NU
kraussianum Meisn.. Rennie 114 NU
salignum E.Mey., Rennie 1319 NU
squarrosum Walp. Edwards 2232 NU
Vigna
nervosa Markotter, Vos 36 NU
vexillata (L.) A. Rich. Rennie 1858 NU
Dolichos angustissimus E.Mey., Rennie 769 NU
GERANIACEAE
Geranium
flanaganii Knuth, Vos 61 NU
pulchrum N.E.Br.. Feltham 402 NU
schlechteri Knuth. Rennie 1525 PRE
wakkerstroomianum Knutli, Rennie 466 NU
Monsonia
brevirostrata Knuth, Rennie 1331 NU
grandifolia Knuth. Rennie 792 PRE
Pelargonium
alchemilloides (L.) L'He't:, Vos 37 NU
bowkeri Harv., Rennie 1865 NU
luridum (Andrews) Sweet, Rennie 738 NU
multicaule Jacq., Rennie 394 NU
schlechteri Knuth. Rennie 1822 NU
zonale (L. ) L 'Hei:, Rennie 772 NU
OXAL1DACEAE
Oxalis
*corniculata L., A. Rennie s.n. NU
obliquifolia Steud. ex A. Rich, Rennie 995 NU
semiloba Sond, Rennie 1284 NU
LINACEAE
Linum thunbergii Eckl. & Zeyh.. Rennie 1212 NU
RUTACEAE
Zanthoxylon
capense (Thunb.) Harv. , Cooper's list
davyi (I.Verd.) PG. Waterman, Feltham 226 NU
Calodendrum capense (L.f.) Tlumb., Cooper's list
Vepris lanceolata (Lam.) G.Don, Feltham 245 NU
Clausena anisata (Willd.) Hook.f. ex Benth., Rennie 714 NU
PTAEROXYLACEAE
Ptaeroxylon obliquum (Thunb.) Radllc, Edwards 2211 NU
MELIACEAE
Ekebergia capensis Sparrm ., Edwards 2016 NU
POLYGALACEAE
Polygala
gerrardii Chodat, Rennie 286 NU
gracilenta Burtt Davy, Edwards 1066 NU
hottentotta C.Presl, Rennie 1614 NU
macowaniana Paiva, Feltham 131 NU [P. confusa MacOwan]
ohlendorfiana Eckl. & Zeyli., Feltham 136 NU
refracta DC.. Rennie 1448 NU
rehmannii Chodat, Rennie 1868 NU
rhinostigma Chodat. Rennie 1591 NU
virgata Tlumb., Rennie 377 NU
Muraltia flanaganii Bolus, Nicholas 1145 NU
EUPHORBIACEAE
Micrococca capensis (Baill.) Plain, Edwards s.n. NU
Adenocline
acuta (Tlumb.) Baill., Edwards 2192 NU
pauciflora Turcz., Rennie 697 NU
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
Acalypha
peduncularis E.Mey. ex Meisn., Rennie 115 NU
punctata Meisn., Feltham 207 NU
schinzii Pax. Edwards 2035 NU
Clutia
abyssinica Jaub. & Spach, Scott-Shaw 3333 CPF
katherinae Pax. Rennie 123 NU
laxa Eckl ex Sond.. Rennie 147 NU
pulchella L.
var. franksiae Prain. Rennie 1667 NU
var. obtusata Sond.. Rennie 1030 NU
var. pulchella Sond.. Feltham 341 NU
Euphorbia
clavarioides Boiss., Rennie 1017 NU
epicyparissias E.Mey. ex Boiss., Feltham 197 NU
gueinzii Boiss., Rennie 144 NU
kraussiana Bernh. var. erubescens N.E.Br., Rennie 1847 PRE
natalensis Bernh., Rennie 1157 NU
striata Thunb., Rennie 26 NU
Chamaesyce inaequilatera (Sond.) Sojdk. Rennie 654 NU
ANACARDIACEAE
Protorhus longifolia (Bernh.) Engl., Scott-Shaw’s list
Rhus
chiridensis Baker f, Edwards s.n. NU
dentata Thunb.. Feltham 264 NU
discolor E.Mey. ex Sond.. Feltham 127 NU
pyroides Burch.
var. pyroides, Rennie 1032 NU
var. gracilis (Engl.) Burtt Davy, Feltham 261 NU
tomentosa L.. Edwards 1998 NU
montana Diels. Edwards 1986 NU
AQUIFOLIACEAE
Ilex mitis (L.) Radik, var. mitis, Edwards 2212 NU
CELASTRACEAE
Gymnosporia
heterophylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Loes., Feltham 263 NU (Maytenus het-
erophylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) N. Robson]
mossambicensis (Klotzsch) Loes., Feltham 255 NU [Maytenus
mossambicensis (Klotzsch) Blakelock]
uniflora Davison. Edwards 2000 NU
Maytenus
acuminata (L.f.) Loes., Feltham 210 NU
peduncularis (Sond.) Loes, Scott-Shaw 3324 CPF
undata (Thunb.) Blakelock, Scott-Shaw 3315 CPF
Pterocelastrus
echinatus N.E.Br.,
rostratus Walp.,
Lauridia tetragona (L.f.) R.H. Archer., Edwards 1951 NU [Cassine
tetragona (L.f.) Loes.]
Hippocratea schlechteri Loes., Scott-Shaw 3341 CPF
ICACINACEAE
Cassinopsis ilicifolia (Hochst.) Kuntze, Feltham 278 NU
Apodytes dimidiata E.Mey. ex Am. subsp. dimidiata, Scott-Shaw 3314 CPF
SAPINDACEAE
Allophyllus
africanus P.Beauv., Feltham 258 NU
dregeanus (Sond.) De Winter, Feltham 254 NU
MELIANTHACEAE
Bersama tysoniana Oliv., Scott-Shaw's list
GREYIACEAE
Greyia sutherlandii Hook. & Harv., Rennie 1148 NU
BALSAMINACEAE
Impatiens hochstetteri Warb. subsp. hochstetteri, Feltham 193 NU
RHAMNACEAE
Scutia myrtina (Bunn.f. ) Kurz , Edwards 1984 NU
Rhamnus prinoides L'Her., Feltham 277 NU
Phylica paniculata Willd.. Edwards 2007 NU
VITACEAE
Rhoicissus
revoilii Planch.. Edwards 7957 NU
tomentosa (Lam.) Wiki & R.B.Drumm ., Cooper’s list
tridentata (L.f.) Wild & R.B.Drumm.. Rennie 790 NU
TILIACEAE
Grewia
lasiocarpa E.Mey. ex Harv., Cooper’s list
occidentalis L., Rennie 733 NU
MALVACEAE
Anisodonteajulii (Burch, ex DC.) Bates subsp. pannosa (Bolus) Bates,
Rennie 1061 NU
*Malva neglecta Wallr., Rennie 1292 NU
Hibiscus
aethiopicus L., Rennie 723 NU
saxatilis J.M.Wood & M.S. Evans, Rennie 1273 NU
trionum L.. Rennie 1126 NU
STERCULIACEAE
Dombeya
cymosa Harv., Feltham 275 NU
tiliacea (Endl.) Planch., Scott-Shaw’s list
Hermannia
cristata Bolus. Hilliard & B.L.Burtt 7181 NU
gerrardii Harv. , Rennie 75 NU
woodii Schinz, Rennie 164 NU
OCHNACEAE
Ochna
gamostigmata Du Toit, Rennie 468 NU
serrulata (Hochst.) Walp., Rennie 995 NU
CLUS1ACEAE
Hypericum
aethiopicum Thunb., Feltham 57 NU
lalandii Choisy, Rennie 1564 NU
natalense J.M.Wood & M.S. Evans, Rennie 976 NU
VIOLACEAE
Hybanthus
capensis (Thunb.) Engl.. Burtt & Hilliard 3494 NU
parviflorus (L.f.) Baill.. Edwards 2215 NU
FLACOURTIACEAE
Kiggelaria africana L., Rennie 1258 NU
Scolopia
flanaganii (Bolus) Sim. Scott-Shaw 3317 CPF
mundii (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Warb.. Rennie 231 NU
zeyheri (Nees) Harv., Edwards 2036 NU
Trimeria grandifolia (Hochst.) Warb.. Rennie 620 NU; Feltham 230 NU
Dovyalis
lucida Sim. Rennie 997 NU
rhamnoides (Burch, ex DC.) Harv., Edwards 2214 NU
zeyheri (Sond.) Warb., Scott-Shaw 3332 CPF
Casearia gladiiformis Mast., Scott-Shaw’s list
ACHARIACEAE
Ceratiosicyos laevis (Thunb.) A.Meeuse, Rennie 832, Edwards 1940 NU
BEGONIACEAE
Begonia sutherlandii Hook.f, W. Marais 1448 PRE
OLINIACEAE
Olinia emarginata Burtt Davy, Rennie 469 NU
THYMELAEACEAE
Peddiea africana Harv.. Scott-Shaw's list
Gnidia
baurii C.H. Wright. Rennie 1490 NU
caffra (Meisn.) Gilg, Rennie 135 NU
gymnostachya (C.A.Mey.) Gilg, Rennie 223 NU
kraussiana Meisn. var. kraussiana, Feltham 84 NU
phaeotricha Gilg, Rennie 1274 NU
polyantha Gilg, Rennie 36 NU
renniana Hilliard & B.L.Burtt. Feltham 57 NU
Passerina
filiformis L., Rennie 82 NU
montana Thoday, Edwards 1125 NU
Dais cotonifolia L., Rennie 1047 NU
RH1ZOPHORACEAE
Cassipourea gerrardii (Scliinz) Alston, Scott-Shaw's list CPF
COMBRETACEAE
Combretum
edwardsii Exell, Edwards 1977 NU
kraussii Hochst., Rennie 1967 NU
MYRTACEAE
Eugenia zuluensis Dummer, Feltham 248 NU
Syzygium gerrardii (Harv. ex Hook.f.) Burtt Davy, Cooper’s list
ONAGRACEAE
Epilobium
capense Buchinger ex Hochst., Rennie 438 NU
112
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Epilobium
hirsutum L., Rennie 583 NU
salignum Hausskn. , Rennie 389 NU
*Oenothera rosea L'Her. ex Aiton, Rennie 34 NU
HALORAGACEAE
Gunnera perpensa L., Rennie 474 NU
Laurembergia repens P.J.Bergius , Huntley 434 NU
ARALIACEAE
Cussonia
paniculata Eckl. & Zeyli. subsp. sinuata ( Reyneke & Knk) De Winter ,
McClean 216 PRE
spicata Thunb., Feltham 252 NU
Seemannaralia gerrardii (Seem.) Harms, Feltham 262 NU
APIACEAE
Sanicula elata Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don, Rennie 1294 NU
Alepidea
amatymbica Eckl. <& Zeyh., Edwards 1044 NU
natalensis J.M.Wood & M.S. Evans, Edwards 1043 NU
woodii Oliv.. Rennie 1076; Edwards 2021 NU
*Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm., Rennie 1281 NU
Conium fontanum Hilliard & B.L.Burtt var. fontanum, Rennie 967 NU
Heteromorpha
arborescens (Spreng.) Cham. & Schltdl., Rennie 872 NU
var. abyssinica (A. Rich.) H. Wolff, Feltham 256 NU [H. trifoliata
(H.Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh.]
Bupleurum mundii Cham. & Schltdl.. Rennie 379 NU
*Ammi majus L. var. glaucifolium (L.) Godr, Hilliard & Burtt 7600 NU
Pimpinella caffra (Eckl. & Zeyh.) D.Dietr, Rennie 743 NU
Peucedanum
caffrum (Meisn.) E. Phillips, Rennie 418 NU
thodei Arnold, Rennie 540 NU
*Daucus carota L., Rennie 372 NU
CORNACEAE
Curtisia dentata (Burm.f) C.A.Sm., Edwards 1974 NU
ERICACEAE
Erica
algida Bolus, Rennie 1078 NU, 1573 PRE
alopecurus Harv., Rennie 20 NU
caffrorum Bolus var. caffrorum, Rennie 1574 PRE
cerinthoides L., Rennie 1375 NU
cooperi Bolus, Edwards 2049 NU
drakensbergensis Guthrie & Bolus, Rennie 3 NU
evansii (N.E.Br.) E.G.H.Oliv.. Rennie 1066 NU
natal itia Bolus, Edwards 2048 NU
oatesii Rolfe, Rennie 401 NU
woodii Bolus
subsp. platyura Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 1249 NU
subsp. woodii, Rennie 529 NU
MYRSINACEAE
Maesa lanceolata Forssk., Edwards s.n. NU
Myrsine africana L., Rennie 342 NU
Rapanea melanophloeos (L. ) Mez, Feltham 250 NU
PRIMULACEAE
Lysimachia ruhmeriana Vatke, Rennie 735 NU
Anagallis huttonii Harv., Rennie 440 NU
EBENACEAE
Euclea crispa (Thunb.) Giirke subsp. crispa, Edwards 2012 NU
Diospyros
austro-africana De Winter var. rubriflora (De Winter ) De Winter,
Rennie 594 NU
dichrophylla (Gand.) De Winter, Scott-Sliaw 3344 CPF
lycioides Desf, Rennie 384 NU
' whyteana ( Hiern ) F. White, Rennie 508 NU
OLEACEAE
Chionanthus
foveolatus ( E.Mcy .) Stearn, Scott-Sliaw 3311 CPF
peglerae (C.H. Wright) Stearn, Scott-Shaw’s list
Olea
capensis L. subsp. macrocarpa (C.H. Wright) l.Verd., Scott-Shaw’s
list
europaea L. subsp. africana (Mill.) PS. Green, Edwards 1947 NU
BUDDLEJACEAE/LOGANIACEAE
Gomphostigma virgatum (L.f.) Bail!., Rennie 644a NU
Buddleja
auriculata Benth., Edwards 1952 NU
dysophylla (Benth.) Radik., Edwards 2216 NU
loricata Leeuwenb., Rennie 1491 NU
salviifolia (L.) Lam., Feltham 238 NU
GENTIAN ACEAE
Sebaea
erosa Scliinz, Rennie 1973 NU
filiformis Scliinz , Rennie 376 NU
longicaulis Scliinz, Rennie 1637 NU
repens Scliinz. Rennie 399 NU
sedoides Gilg
var. confertiflora (Scliinz) Marais, Rennie 1638 PRE
var. schoenlundii (Scliinz) Marais, Rennie 1640 NU
var. sedoides, Feltham 201 NU
Chironia
krebsii Griseb., Feltham 281 NU
peglerae Plain, Rennie 1299 NU
APOCYNACEAE
Carissa bispinosa (L. ) Desf. ex Brenan, Rennie 623 NU
Strophanthus speciosus (Ward & Harv.) Reber, Feltham 249 NU
Raphionacme hirsuta (E.Mey .) R. A. Dyer ex E. Phillips, Rennie 1445
NU [Periplocaceae]
Xysmalobium [Asclepiadaceae]
involucratum (E.Mey.) Decne., Rennie 897 NU
parviflorutn Harv. ex Scott Elliot, Rennie 215 NU
prunelloides Turcz,, Rennie 232 NU
stockenstromense Scott Elliot, Rennie 666 NU
undulatum (L.) Aiton f, Rennie 536 NU
Schizoglossum
atropurpureum E.Mey. subsp. atropurpureum , Rennie 713 NU
bidens E.Mey. subsp. pachyglossum (Schltr.) Kupicha, Rennie 890\
Edwards 2030 NU
elingue N.E.Br subsp. elingue, Rennie 233 NU
flavum Schltr. . Feltham 30 NU
hilliardiae Kupicha, Edwards 2225 NU
nitidum Schltr., Rennie 1325 NU
aff. stenoglossum Schltr., Edwards 2222 NU
Aspidoglossum
gracile (E.Mey.) Kupicha, Edwards 2220 NU
interruptum (E.Mey.) Bullock. Rennie 1420 NU
Miraglossum
pulchellum (Schltr.) Kupicha, Rennie 297 NU
verticillare (Schltr) Kupicha, Rennie 892 NU
Periglossum angustifolium Decne., Hilliard & Burtt 7594 NU
Pachycarpus
campanulatus (Harv.) N.E.Br., Rennie 898 NU
var. campanulatus, Rennie 281 NU
dealbatus E.Mey., Edwards 2189 NU
macrochilus ( Schltr. ) N.E.Br., Rennie 860 NU
plicatus N.E.Br.. Rennie 311 NU
Asclepias
affinis (Schltr.) Schltr.. Rennie 1179 NU
cultriformis Harv. ex Schltr., Rennie 864 NU
dregeana Schltr., Rennie 284 NU
flexuosa (E.Mey.) Schltr., Rennie 1180 NU
gibba (E.Mey.) Schltr.. Hilliard Burtt 7205 NU
macropus (Schltr.) Schltr., Rennie 1120 NU
multicaulis (E.Mey.) Schltr., Rennie 778 NU
stellifera Schltr., Rennie 593 NU
Gomphocarpus fruticosus (L.) Aiton, Rennie 284 NU [Asclepias fru-
ticosa L.]
Aspidonepsis
diploglossa (Turcz.) Nicholas & Goyder, Rennie 488 NU
flava ( N.E.Br ) Nicholas & Goyder, Rennie 275 NU
reenensis (N.E.Br.) Nicholas Goyder, Rennie 1109 NU
Secamone alpini Schultes, Rennie 950 NU
Brachystelma
pulchellum (Harv.) Schltr., Rennie 506 NU
Brachystelma (cont.)
pygmaeum (Schltr) N.E.Br, Rennie 21 NU
Riocreuxia torulosa Decne., Rennie 637 NU
CONVOLVULACEAE
Convolvulus natalensis Bernh. ex Krauss, Rennie 617 NU
Ipomoea pcllita Hallierf, Rennie 306 NU
BORAGINACEAE
Cynoglossum
austroafricanum Hilliard A B.L.Burtt, Rennie 379 NU
hispidum Thunb., Rennie 166 NU
lanceolatum Forssk., Rennie 545 NU
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
113
Cynoglossum (cont.)
spelaeum Hilliard & B.L.Burtt , Rennie 507 NU
Afrotysonia glochidiata (R.R.Mill) R.R.Mill, Rennie 718 NU
Myosotis
semiamplexicaulis DC.. Rennie 825 NU
sylvatica Hoffm.. Feltham 186 NU
Lithospermum
afromontanum Weim., Rennie 7946 NU
papillosum Thunb., Rennie 110 NU
VERBENACEAE
Verbena
*bonariensis L., Rennie 656 NU
*venosa Gill & Hook.. Rennie 664 NU
Lantana rugosa Thunb., Rennie 1374 NU
Clerodendrum glabrum E.Mey., Edwards s.n. NU
LAMIACEAE
Ajuga ophrydis Burch, ex Benth.. Rennie 447 NU
Teucrium kraussii Codd. Rennie 1615 NU
Leonotis
leonurus (L.) R.Br., Vos 538 NU
obovata Spreng. , Feltham 345 NU
ocymifolia (Burm.f. ) Iwarsson
var. ocymifolia, Feltham 345 NU [L. dubia E.Mey]
var. raineriana (Vis.) Iwarsson, Vos 44 NU [L. intermedia Lindl.]
Stachys
aethiopica L.. Rennie 320 NU
caffra E.Mey. ex Benth., Feltham 189 NU
grandifolia E.Mey. ex Benth., Vos 43 NU
kuntzei Giirke, Marais 1450 PRE
sessilis Giirke. Rennie 659 NU
simplex Schltr., Rennie 1219 NU
Salvia
aurita L.f. var. galpinii (Skan) Hedge. Rennie 522 NU
repens Burch, ex Benth., Edwards 1063 NU
Satureja reptans Killick, Rennie 574 NU
Mentha
aquatica L.. Rennie 819 NU
longifolia (L.) L.. Rennie 999 NU
Pycnostachys reticulata (E.Mey.) Benth., Rennie 482 NU
Plectranthus
ciliatus E.Mey. ex Benth., Carbutt s.n. NU
dolicopodus Briq., Edwards 1945 NU
fructicosus L’Her., Vos 42 NU
grallatus Briq., Rennie 511 NU
Rabdosiella calycina (Benth.) Codd, Rennie 568 NU
Hemizygia cinerea Codd, Edwards 1977 NU
Becium obovatum (E.Mey. ex Benth.) N.E.Be subsp. obovatum var.
obovatum. Edwards s.n. NU [B. grandiflorum (Lam.) Pic.
Serm. var. obovatum (E.Mey. ex Benth.) Sebald]
SOLANACEAE
Solanum
chenopodioides Lam., Rennie 867 NU
giganteum Jacq., Edwards 1954 NU
*nigrum L., Edwards 1077 a NU
retroflexum Dun., Rennie 669 NU
SCROPHULARIACEAE
Diascia megathura Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 1735 NU
Nemesia
albiflora N.E.Br.. Rennie 1861 NU
caerulea Hiem, Feltham 47 NU
melissifolia Benth., Vos 49 NU
silvatica Hilliard, Rennie 1 NU
Diclis
reptans Benth., Hilliard & Burn 7192 NU
rotundifolia (Hiem) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt. Hilliard & Burn 7602 NU
Halleria lucida L., Rennie 173 NU
Phygelius aequalis Harv. ex Hiem, Rennie 321 NU
Bowkeria verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Schinz, Rennie 483 NU
Manulea florifera Hilliard & B.L.Burtt. Rennie 302 NU
Sutera
floribunda (Benth.) Kuntze, Edwards 1071 NU
polelensis Hiem. Rennie 1647 NU
Jamesbrittenia
breviflora (Schltr.) Hilliard, Hilliard & Bum 3471 NU [Sutera bre-
viflora (Schltr.) Hiem]
filicaulis (Benth.) Hilliard, Rennie 310 NU [Sutera fdicaulis (Benth.)
Hilliard]
Zaluzianskya
distans Hiem, Rennie 1280 NU
elongata Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 1245 NU
glareosa Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 1839 PRE
microsiphon (Kuntze) K.Schum., Edwards 1080 NU
natalensis Hochst., Rennie 1840 NU
pulvinata Killick, Hilliard & Burn 7172 NU
spathacea (Benth.) Walp., Rennie 1244 NU
Mimulus gracilis R.Br, Rennie 146 NU
Limosella
longiflora Kuntze, Rennie 489 NU
maior Diels, Rennie 23 NU
*Veronica persica Poir., Rennie 1092 NU
Melasma scabrum P.J.Bergius, Feltham 283 NU
Alectra sessiliflora ( Vald ) Kuntze var. sessiliflora, Rennie 1663 NU
Graderia scabra (L.f.) Benth., Rennie 84 NU
Sopubia cana Harv., Rennie 639 NU
Buchnera
dura Benth., Rennie 1228 NU
glabrata Benth.. Rennie 480 NU
simplex (Thunb.) Druce, Rennie 1228 NU
Cycnium racemosum Benth., Rennie 1237 NU
Striga
asiatica (L.) Kuntze, Rennie 573 NU
bilabiata (Thunb.) Kuntze, Edwards 1061 NU
elegans Benth., Vos 34 NU
Harveya
pulchra Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 2416 NU
speciosa Benth. ex C.Krauss, Rennie 312 NU
Hebenstretia dura Choisy, Feltham 209 NU
Selago
flanaganii Rolfe, Rennie s.n. NU
immersa Rolfe. Rennie 1293 NU
pachypoda Rolfe, Rennie 318 NU
Walafrida densiflora (Rolfe) Rolfe, Rennie 1669 NU
GESNERIACEAE
Streptocarpus
gardenii Hook., Rennie 490 NU
pentherianus Fritsch, Feltham 96 NU
pusillus Harv. ex C.B. Clarke, Rennie 424 NU
LENT1BULARIACEAE
Utricularia
livida E.Mey.. Rennie 439 NU
prehensilis E.Mey., Rennie 16 NU
ACANTHACEAE
Thunbergia venosa C.B. Clarke. Rennie 1270 NU
Chaetacanthus setiger (Pers.) Lindl, Rennie 1175 PRE
Crabbea acaulis N.E.Br., Rennie 1062 NU
Hypoestes triflora (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult., Rennie 1970
Isoglossa
grantii C.B. Clarke, Rennie 1111
hypoestiflora Lindau, Feltham 72 NU
macowanii C.B. Clarke. Rennie 1952 NU
Justicia campylostemon (Nees) T. Anderson, Rennie 1990
Adhatoda andromeda (Lindau) C.B. Clarke, Rennie 66 NU
PLANTAGINACEAE
Plantago
*lanceolata L.. Rennie 1028 NU
*virginica L., Rennie 1324 NU
RUB1ACEAE
Kohautia amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh., Rennie 607 NU
Conostomium natalense (Hochst.) Bremek., Edwards 2011 NU
Burchellia bubalina (L.f.) Sims, Scott-Shaw's list
Rothmannia
capensis Thunb., Edwards 2207 NU
globosa (Hochst.) Keay, Scott-Shaw’s list
Hyperacanthus amoenus (Sims) Bridson,
Tricalysia lanceolata (Sond.) Burtt Davy, Scott-Shaw’s list
Pentanisia prunelloides (Klotzsch ex Eckl & Zeyh.) Walp., Rennie 983 NU
Pygmaeothamnus chamaedendrum (Kuntze) Robyns, Rennie 869 NU
Canthium
ciliatum ( Klotzsch ) Kuntze, Rennie 1267 NU
kuntzeanum Bridson, Rennie 1033 NU
mundianum Cham. & Schltd., Scott-Shaw’s list
Psydrax obovata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Bridson subsp. obovata, Scott-Shaw’s list
Pachy stigma macrocalyx (Sond.) Robyns, Edwards 1937 NU
Pavetta
cooperi Harv. & Sond., Edwards 2204 NU
114
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Pavetta (cont.)
kotzei Bremer , Scott-Shaw 3323 CPF
Galopina circaeoides Thunb., Rennie 1393 NU
Anthospermum herbaceum L.f, Feltham 71 NU
Spermacoce natalensis Hochst. , Rennie 560 NU
Galium
capense Thunb.. Rennie 268 NU
thunbergianum Eckl. & Zeyh.
var. hirsutum (Sond.) Verde.. Rennie 502 NU
var. thunbergianum, Rennie 1611 NU
Rubia
petiolaris DC.. Rennie 795 NU
cordifolia L. subsp. conotricha (Gand.) Verde., Edwards 1973 NU
VALERI AN ACEAE
Valeriana capensis Thunb. var, capensis, Feltham 141 NU
D1PSACACEAE
Cephalaria
natalensis Kuntze, Hilliard & Burtt 10123 NU
oblongifolia ( Kuntze ) Szabo. Rennie 811 NU
Scabiosa columbaria L., Feltham 53 NU
CUCURB1TACEAE
Mukia maderaspatana (L.) M.Roem., Rennie 1074 NU
Zehneria
parvifolia (Cogn.) J.H.Ross, Rennie 793 NU
scabra (L.f.) Sond.. Rennie 824 NU
Coccinia hirtella Cogn., Rennie 130 NU
CAMPANULACEAE
Wahlenbergia
appressifolia Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 331 NU
cuspidata Brehmer, Rennie 818 NU
fasciculata Brehmer. Rennie 18 NU
huttonii (Sond.) Thulin , Rennie 1097 NU
krebsii Cham.. Feltham 26 NU
pallidiflora Hilliard & B.L.Burtt. Edwards 1081 NU
paucidentata Scliinz. Rennie 848 NU
rivularis Diels, Rennie 393 NU
Craterocapsa tarsodes Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 497 NU
LOBELIACEAE
Cyphia
elata Harv., Rennie 526 NU
longifolia N.E.Br, Rennie 201 NU
natalensis E. Phillips, Rennie 872 NU
rogersii S. Moore subsp. winteri E.Wimm., Edwards 1042 NU
tysonii E. Phillips, Rennie 538 NU
Lobelia
flaccida (C.Presl) A. DC. subsp. flaccida, Rennie 460 NU
erinus L. , Feltham 34 NU
laxa MacOwan, Rennie 871 NU
oreas E.Wimm., Rennie 83 NU
vanreenensis ( Kuntze ) K. Sebum., Feltham 90 NU
Monopsis
decipiens (Sond.) Thulin, Rennie 145 NU
stellarioides (Pres!) Urb. subsp. stellarioides, Rennie 966 NU
ASTERACEAE
Vernonia
flanaganii (E. Phillips) Hilliard, Rennie 420
gerrardii Harv., Rennie 339 NU
hirsuta (DC.) Sch.Bip., Hilliard & Burtt 7160 NU
natalensis Sch.Bip. ex Walp., Rennie 340 NU
neocorymbosa Hilliard, Edwards 1988 NU
Aster
bakerianus Burtt Davy ex C.A.Sm., Feltham 120 NU
perfoliatus Oliv., Rennie 426 NU
pleiocephalus (Harv.) Hutch., Rennie 153 NU
Felicia
filifolia (Vent.) Burtt Davy, Rennie 397 NU
linearis N.E.Br., Edwards 1048 NU
muricata (Thunb.) Nees, Rennie 948 NU
rosulata Yen. Rennie 1857 NU
Nidorella
auriculata DC.. Rennie 359 NU
undulata (Tlutnb.) Sond. ex Harv., Rennie 224 NU
Conyza
*bonariensis (L.) Cronquist, Rennie 661 NU
*canadensis (L.) Cronquist, Rennie 1130 NU
obscura DC.. Rennie 563,; Edwards 2019 NU
pinnata (L.f.) Kuntze, Rennie 209 NU
scabrida DC., Rennie 1398 NU
Nolletia rarifolia (Turcz.) Steetz, Hilliard & Burtt 7163 NU
Chrysocoma ciliata L., Rennie 96 NU
Denekia capensis Thunb.. Rennie 471 NU
Gnaphalium confine Harv., Rennie 649 NU
Troglophyton capillaceum (Thunb.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt subsp. dif-
fusum (DC.) Hilliard, Rennie 1684 NU
Pseudognaphalium
luteo-album (L.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 220 NU
oligandrum (DC.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Hilliard & Burtt 7599 NU
undulatum (L.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Hilliard & Burtt 7593 NU
*Gamochaeta coarctata (Willd.) Kerguelen, Rennie 992 NU [Gnapha-
lium coarctation Willd.]
Helichrysum
acutatum DC., Rennie 711 NU
adenocarpum DC., Rennie 747 NU
allioides Less., Edwards 2225 NU
appendiculatum (L.f.) Less., Feltham 258 NU
aureum (Houtt.) Merr.
var. aureum, Rennie 127 NU
var. monocephalum (DC.) Hilliard, Rennie 652 NU
var. serotinum Hilliard. Rennie 525 NU
caespititium (DC.) Harv.. Hilliard & Burtt 7175 NU
cephaloideum DC.. Rennie 203 NU
chionosphaerum DC.. Feltham 8 NU
confertifolium Klatt, Rennie 1636 NU
cooperi Harv., A.P.D. McClean 208 PRE
dregeanum Sond. & Harv., Hilliard & Burtt 7211 NU
ecklonis Sond., Rennie 461 NU
epapposunr Bolus, Rennie 1687 NU
fulvum N.E.Br.. Rennie 694 NU
glomeratum Klatt, Scott-Shaw 3322 CPF
grundibracteatum M.D.Hend., Rennie 125 NU
herbaceum (Andrews) Sweet, Rennie 308 NU
krebsianum Less. . Rennie 205 NU
krookii Moeser, Edwards 1075 NU
melanacme DC., Hilliard & Burtt 7592 NU
miconiifolium DC., Rennie 226 NU
monticola Hilliard. Rennie 252 NU
nrundtii Han., Hilliard & Burtt 7590 NU
nudifolium (L.) Less.. Rennie 868 NU
opacum Klatt, Rennie 712 NU
oreophilum Klatt, Rennie 338 NU
pallidum DC., Rennie 776 NU
pilosellum (L.f) Less., Rennie 131 NU
platypterum DC.. Rennie 373 NU
rugulosum Less., Rennie s.n. NU
sessilioides Hilliard, Rennie 175 NU
simillimum DC., Rennie 358 NU
spiralepis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 990 NU
splendidum (Thunb.) Less., Rennie 204 NU
subluteum Burtt Davy, Hilliard & Burtt 7190 NU
sutherlandii Harv., Rennie 374 NU
trilineatum DC., Rennie 1572 NU
umbraculigerum Less., Rennie 352 NU
vernurn Hilliard, Rennie 755 NU
Relhania acerosa (DC.) Bremer. Rennie 93 NU
Macowania pinifolia (N.E.Br. ) Kroner, Rennie 407 NU [Athrixia pini-
folia N.E.Br.]
Athrixia
angustissima DC., Rennie 303 NU
arachnoidea J.M.Wood & M.S. Evans ex J.M.Wood, Rennie 405 NU
fontana MacOwan, Rennie 239 NU
Printzia
auriculata Han’., Rennie 400 NU
pyrifolia Less., Rennie 355 NU
*Bidens pilosa L.. Rennie 562 NU
*Gulinsoga parviflora Cav., Rennie 544 NU
*Tagetes minuta L., Rennie 381 NU
Inulanthera coronopifolia (Harv.) Kdllersjo, Rennie 380 NU
*Anthemis arvensis L., Rennie 218 NU
* Achillea millefolium L. s.l„ Rennie 865 NU
Lepidostephium asteroides (Bolus & Schltr) Kroner, Rennie 520 NU
Cotula
australis (Spreng.) Hook.fi Rennie 1143 NU
hispida (DC.) Harv, Rennie 1405 NU
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
115
Schistostephium
crataegifolium (DC.) Fenzl ex Han’., Rennie 354 NU
hippiifolium (DC.) Hutch.. Rennie 398 NU
Artemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd., Rennie 549 NU
Cineraria
deltoidea Sond., Edwards 2015 NU
pinnata O.Hoffin., Edwards 2034 NU
Senecio
adnatus DC.. Hilliard & Bunt 7615 NU
arabidifolius O.Hoffin., Hilliard & Burtt 7212 NU
barbatus DC., Hilliard Burtt 7189 NU
brevidentatus M.P.Hend., Hilliard & Burtt 7614 NU
bupleuroides DC.. Rennie 206 PRE
cathcartensis O.Hoffin.. Rennie 672 NU
citriceps Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 961 NU
coronatus (Thunb.) Han’., Rennie 693 NU
deltoideus Less., Rennie 5 NU
discodregianus Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 627 NU
dregeanus DC., Rennie 986 NU
erubescens Aiton
var. crepidifolius DC., Rennie 429 NU
var. erubescens DC., Rennie 487 NU
glaberrimus DC., Rennie 206 NU
gregatus Hilliard, Rennie 1140 NU
harveianus MacOwan, Rennie 353 NU
heliopsis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt. Rennie 165 NU
hirsutilobus Hilliard , Rennie 227 NU
hygrophilus R. A. Dyer <& C.A.Sm., Hilliard & Burtt 7530 NU
inaequidens DC., Rennie 464 NU
inomatus DC., Rennie 356 NU
isatideus DC.. Hilliard & Burtt 7616 NU
lydenbergensis Hutch. & Burtt Davy, Rennie 987 NU
macrocephalus DC. sens, lat., Feltham 191 NU
macrospermus DC., Rennie 1369 NU
madagascariensis Poir., Rennie 650 NU
marginalis Hilliard, Rennie 472 NU
othonniflorus DC.. Hilliard & Burtt 7198 NU
oxyriifolius DC.. Rennie 1169 NU
panduriformis Hilliard, Rennie 392 PRE
polyodon DC. var. polyodon, Rennie 619 NU
retrorsus DC., Hilliard & Burtt 7596 NU
ruwenzoriensis S. Moore, Rennie 1054 NU
scitus Hutch. & Burtt Davy, Hilliard & Burtt 7184 NU
striatifolius DC.. Hilliard & Burtt 7164 NU
subcoriaceus Schltr., Rennie 603 NU
subrubriflorus O.Hoffin., Rennie 347: Edwards 2018 NU
umgeniensis Thell., Rennie 588 NU
Delairea odorata Lem., Rennie 375 NU
Mikaniopsis cissampelina (DC.) C. Jeffrey, Edwards 2047 NU
Euryops
evansii Schltr.. Edwards 1056 NU
laxus (Harv.) Burtt Davy, Hilliard & Burtt 7165 NU
transvaalensis Klatt, Rennie 309 NU
tysonii E. Phillips, Rennie 527 NU
Othonna
burttii B.Nord.. Rennie 172 NU
natalensis Scli.Bip., Rennie 1256 NU
Dimorphotheca
caulescens Harv., Rennie 519 NU [Osteospermum caulescens Harv.]
jucundum E. Phillips, Feltham 83 NU [Osteospermum jucundum
(E. Phillips) Norl.]
Osteospermum attenuatum Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, Rennie 307 NU
Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) Norl., Edwards 2008 NU
Ursinia
montana DC.. Rennie 1846 NU
tenuiloba DC.. Rennie 279 NU
Arctotis arctotoides (L.f.) O.Hoffin., Rennie 72 NU
Haplocarpha
nervosa (Thunb.) P.Beauv., Rennie 601 NU
scaposa Harv., Rennie 383 NU
Gazania linearis (Thunb.) Druce, Feltham 143 a NU
Hirpicium armerioides (DC.) Roessler, Rennie 467 NU
Berkheya
cirsiifolia (DC.) Roessler, Rennie 1116 NU
debilis MacOwan, Feltham 340 NU
macrocephala J.M.Wood. Rennie 676 NU
rhapontica (DC.) Hutch. & Burtt Davy
subsp. platyptera (Harv.) Roessler. Rennie 721 NU
subsp. rhapontica. Rennie 570 NU
setifera DC., Rennie 374 NU
speciosa (DC.) O.Hoffin. subsp. ovata Roessler, Rennie 1168 NU
*Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten., Rennie 571 NU
Dicoma anomala Sond.. Rennie 565 NU
Gerbera
ambigua (Cass.) Sch.Bip., Hilliard & Burtt 7170 NU
piloselloides (L.) Cass., Rennie 949 NU
Tolpis capensis (L.) Sch.Bip.. Rennie 851 a NU
Hypochoeris
*microcephala (Sch.Bip.) Cabrera var. albiflora (Kuntze) Cabrera,
Rennie 909 NU
*radicata L.. Rennie 854 NU
^Taraxacum hamatiforme Dahlst., Rennie 605 NU
Sonchus
*asper (L. ) Hill, Rennie 703 NU
dregeanus DC., Hilliard & Burtt 7191 NU
integrifolius Harv., Rennie 701 NU
nanus Sond. ex Harv, Rennie 5500 NU
*oleraceus L., Rennie 823 NU
Lactuca
inermis Forssk., Rennie 413 NU [L. capensis Thunb.]
tysonii (E. Phillips) C. Jeffrey, Rennie 491 NU
Crepis hypochoeridea (DC.) Thell.. Rennie 859 NU
Bothalia 32,1: 117-122 (2002)
Preliminary DNA fingerprinting of the turf grass Cynodon dactylon
(Poaceae: Chloridoideae)
R. ROODT*, JJ. SPIES* and T.H. BURGER*
Keywords: Cynodon Rich., genetic distances, identification. RAPDs. turf grasses
ABSTRACT
Identification of different cultivars of turf grasses is often very difficult. In a preliminary attempt to identify different
cultivars of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses of some well-known cul-
tivars used in South Africa, i.e. Bayview, Cape Royal. Florida, Harrismith, Silverton Blue, Skaapplaas and Tifdwarf, as well
as 10 potential new cultivars, were done. These results were used to determine the genetic distances among cultivars. Only
five primers were needed to obtain a specific fragment pattern for each cultivar. The degree of amplification was used as an
additional criterion by including all visible fragments, excluding very faint fragments and only including the brightest frag-
ments. The neighbour-joining trees of C. dactylon showed best resolution from the data set with all visible fragments includ-
ed. although fragment intensity did not affect the tree topology. The cultivars Silverton Blue and Bayview exhibited the
greatest genetic variation and two potential new cultivars were identified. RAPD analyses can, therefore, be used to distin-
guish between different C. dacty'lon cultivars and to determine the genetic variation between them by calculating genetic
distances.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Cynodon Rich, comprises six species
indigenous to South Africa: C. bradleyi Stent, C. dacty-
lon (L.) Pers., C. hirsutus Stent, C. incompletus Nees, C.
polevansii Stent and C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy, as
well as two naturalized species, C. aethiopicus Clayton
& Harlan and C. nlemfuensis Vanderyst (Gibbs Russell et
al. 1990). These species are morphologically very simi-
lar. Cynodon bradleyi , C. dactylon and C. transvaalensis
are cultivated as turf grasses. Often potential new culti-
vars are introduced, but are these really new cultivars or
are some just variable morphological forms of existing
cultivars?
In an attempt to find an easy, inexpensive and efficient
method to distinguish between the different cultivars,
and potential new cultivars, random amplified polymor-
phic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting was used. Welsh &
McClelland ( 1990), as well as Williams et al. ( 1990) first
described this method. The technique has proven to be a
powerful tool for investigating genetic variation in vari-
ous plant groups (Williams et al. 1990; Carlson et al.
1991; Klein-Lankhorst et al. 1991; Michelmore et al.
1991; Welsh et al. 1991; Vierling & Nguyen 1992;
Harada et al. 1993; Huff et al. 1993; Howell et a l. 1994;
Van Buren et al. 1994; Brummer et al. 1995; Hilu 1995;
Multani & Lyon 1995; Wachira et al. 1995; Marillia &
Scoles 1996; Bai et al. 1997; Parani et al. 1997;
Swoboda & Bhalla 1997; Barker et al. 1999; Sun et al.
1999; Baranek et al. 2000; Gwanama et al. 2000; Lanteri
et al. 2001).
RAPD analysis has also been widely applied to turf-
grass and related grass profiling at molecular level.
These include studies of perennial ryegrass (Sweeney &
Danneberger 1994, 1997; Huff 1997); Agrostis stoloni-
fera L. (Golembiewski et al. 1997); Agrostis spp.
* Department of Plant Sciences: Genetics (62), University of the Free
State. P.O. Box 339, 9300 Bloemfontein.
MS. received: 2000-05-05.
(Ohmura et al. 1997); Poa pratensis L. (Huff & Bara
1993; Barcaccia et al. 1997); P. annua L. (Sweeney &
Danneberger 1995, 1996); as well as Cynodon (Busey et
al. 1996)."
Amplification conditions for RAPD analysis are simi-
lar to those used in a normal polymerase chain reaction,
except that only one primer is used instead of two
primers with specific sequences (Williams et al. 1990).
As a result, amplification in RAPD analysis occurs
everywhere in a genome, where it contains two comple-
mentary sequences to the primer that are within the
length-limits of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR),
which is ± 3 kb. The PCR patterns obtained from RAPDs
are dependent on both the template and the specific PCR
primer. Yu et al. ( 1993) observed the fragment size range
to be from 0.5 to 2.5 kb and the fragment numbers from
1-10.
Polymorphisms detected by the RAPD technique are
inherited as dominant markers in a Mendelian fashion
and can be generated in any species without prior DNA
sequence information (Williams et al. 1990; Welsh et al.
1991). Marsan et al. ( 1 993 ) showed that DNA fragments,
from inbred maize lines, were always present in one or
both of the respective parental lines, thus suggesting that
RAPD fragments were stably transmitted from genera-
tion to generation.
A general characteristic of the RAPD profile is the
difference in fragment intensities. These differences in
fragment intensities were therefore, also used as criteria
in determining genetic variation within and between
known cultivars and unknown specimens.
The aim of this preliminary study is to use DNA pro-
files generated by the RAPD method to identify various
known Cynodon cultivars from vegetative material, and
to identify potential new cultivars, by comparing them
with some well-known cultivars currently used in the
industry. A further purpose is to use the RAPD data to
calculate the genetic distances between the different cul-
118
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
tivars, thereby investigating the variation within and
between the studied specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material
Material from some of the most important commer-
cially available cultivars were received from Top Crop
Nursery and planted in a greenhouse at the Department
of Plant Sciences: Genetics at the University of the Free
State, under controlled environmental conditions. The
plants were cultivated from vegetative material. Voucher
herbarium specimens (Table 1 ) are housed in the Geo
Potts Herbarium, University of the Free State,
Bloemfontein (BLFU). The cultivars used were
Bayview, Cape Royal, Florida, Harrismith, Silverton
Blue, Skaapplaas and Tifdwarf, as well as 10 potential
new cultivars (SAG. 01-06 & 09-13).
DNA extraction and RAP I) amplification
DNA was extracted from ground leaves according to
the method described by Edwards et al. (1991). The
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a
total volume of 25 pi, containing ± 25 ng of genomic
DNA, 5-12pmol primer, 5 pi 5X Buffer [500 pi lOXTaq
Polymerase buffer (500 mM potassium chloride, 100
mM Tris-HCl {pH 9.0}, 1% triton X- 100), 1 mg gelatine,
2.25 pi triton X-100, 100 pi of each 100 mM deoxynu-
cleotidephosphate, 457 pi sterilized water], 1.5 mM
magnesium chloride and 1.25U of Taq polymerase. Five
primers were used that showed clear reproducible band-
ing patterns, i.e. OPA11 (5’-CAATCGCCGT-3’), OPA16
(5’-AGCCAGCGAA-3’), OPA20 (5’-GTTGCGATCC-
3’), OPB03 (5’-CATCCCCCTG-3’) and OPB06 (5’-
TGCTCTGCCC-3’) (Operon Technologies, Alameda,
California). These primers were chosen because they
provided excellent resolution with a large range of unre-
lated grasses in our laboratory (results not shown).
Amplification cycles were as follows: initial denatura-
tion at 94°C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 30
seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 34°C and 90 seconds at
TABLE 1 . — Cultivar names and voucher numbers of Cynodon dactv-
lon specimens
Cultivar*/code Voucher no.
^Duplicate samples of the first five cultivars were received, represent-
ing two different geographical areas. This was done to determine the
variability within cultivars.
72°C with a final elongation step of 5 minutes at 72°C.
The reproducibility of the technique was tested by
duplicating each reaction (44 reactions for 22 specimens
per primer). This was done by performing amplifications
on identical DNA samples in two different reactions.
These findings confirmed that the fragment pattern for a
particular combination of primer and DNA was repro-
ducible for replicates, both in and between experiments.
Between 5-10 pi of the amplification product was
mixed with gel loading buffer and separated on a 1%
(m/v) agarose gel in TBE containing ethidium bromide
(0.4 mg/ml). The gel was run in 0.3X TBE (IX TBE =
0.089 M Tris-HCl, 0.089 M boric acid, 0.002 M EDTA)
or 0.5X TAE (IX TAE = 0.04 M Tris-HCl, 1.142 ml
acetic acid, 0.001 M EDTA) buffer at 120 V for ± 60
minutes. DNA lambda molecular weight markers VI or
X were included in each gel. The fragments were viewed
under UV light and documented with a 35 mm photo-
graph.
TABLE 2. — Comparison between five primers used with respect to no. of fragments observed, repeatability, fragment intensity
and range of fragments
Primers
Fragments
o
c
6
3
-a
s
b/j
CQ
c
"a.
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
119
Cape Royal 1
Cape Royal 2
92
97
97
92
64
66
71
72
5 changes
Tifdwarf 1
Tif dwarf 2
73
76
Florida 1
Florida 2
Bayview 1
Bayview 2
100
100
■— 80
85
Skaapplaas
99
r SAG.02
SAG. 03
94
SAG. 04
SAG.05
SAG.06
- SAG.09
SAG.11
SAG.10
Harrismith
SAG. 13
Silverton Blue 1
— Silverton Blue 2
SAG.01
FIGURE 1.. — Neighbour-joining
tree constructed from the
data matrix that included
all visible RAPD frag-
ments for Cynodon. Boot-
strap values are indicated
on branches and jack-
knife values below branches.
Fragment and phylogenetic analysis
The fragments were manually scored for each primer
as present (1) or absent (0), for all the cultivars studied.
Furthermore, the fragments were divided into three cate-
gories according to intensity of the fragments: bright,
medium and faint fragments. The data were classified in
three different sets, namely (a) including all visible frag-
ments, (b) excluding faint fragments, and (c) using only
bright fragments (Table 2).
The different fragment intensities observed with the
amplification products were also scored, by comparing
the fragments within a specific specimen, for each
primer. This was done due to different specimens ampli-
fying at different intensities.
The data were analysed with PAUP* (phylogenetic
analysis using parsimony *and other methods) 4.0b8a
(Swofford 1998). Cluster analysis was performed by
using the neighbour-joining method (NJ) as implement-
ed in this software and neighbour-joining trees were con-
structed, using total character difference as distance mea-
sure. Cape Royal was used as the outgroup in this study,
being the morphologically distinct cultivar. Bootstrap
values were calculated from 500 replicates (Felsenstein
1985) with resampling of all 96 characters. Jackknife
values were calculated from 500 replicates, with 50%
deletion and the emulate Jac resampling option in effect
(Lanyon 1985).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The 22 specimens of C. dactylon came from seven
known cultivars, duplicate specimens (collected from
different localities) of five of these cultivars and ten
120
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
potential new cultivars (Table 1). Table 2 contains infor-
mation on the total number of fragments scored, the per-
centage of fragments that showed no replication, the per-
centage of faint, medium and bright fragments, the mini-
mum and maximum number of fragments per specimen,
and the range of fragment sizes.
For primer OPA11, Cape Royal 2 specimen and for
primer OPA16, Cape Royal 1 and Silverton Blue 1, the
duplicated reactions failed, as a result of total PCR fail-
ure (and thus not failure of repeatability). This informa-
tion was not used in the calculations of the percentage of
fragments that showed no repetition (Table 2).
The percentage of fragments, which showed no repe-
tition in the duplicates of a reaction, varied from 1.33%
in OPB03 to 2.82% in OPA16, with an average of 2.03%
(Table 2). This indicates that fragment reproducibility
was high with all the primers used, OPB03 being the
most reproducible. Most of the fragments that showed no
repetition were of faint intensity.
A series of tests, done on different DNA extractions
from the same plant and different amplification of the
same DNA sample, indicated that RAPD results are reli-
able. Well-amplified regions corresponded in all repeats
from the same sample. The only differences observed
were in faint fragments found in certain repeats.
A general characteristic of the RAPD profile is the
difference in fragment intensities. Many speculations for
the reason of this phenomenon have been given. One
explanation is that the difference may be linked to the
degree of homology between primer and template DNA
(Thormann et al. 1994). Caetano-Anolles et al. (1991)
speculated that it might be the result of amplification of
multiple copies in the genome.
All five primers exhibited differences in the duplicate
specimens of the cultivars Cape Royal, Tifdwarf,
Florida, Bayview and Silverton Blue, which ranged from
faint to bright fragment differences. These results indi-
cate varying degrees of variability within these cultivars,
especially Silverton Blue and Bayview. One fragment
was consistent throughout all the specimens for two
primers, namely a ± 700 bp fragment with primer OPA-
1 6 and a ± 570 bp fragment with primer OPB-06. All the
primers exhibited a few other prominent fragments in
most of the specimens. Very few unique cultivar-speci-
fic fragments were found, which could be linked to the
small sample size.
For the neighbour-joining analysis, the three different
data sets for Cynodon (according to fragment intensity)
were used separately. Though their intensities differ, the
three data sets gave neighbour-joining trees with the
same topology. The resolution decreased with fewer
parameters (number of fragments), therefore, the neigh-
bour-joining tree using all visible fragments was the best
resolved and will be discussed further (Figure 1):
SAG. 01 groups with the Silverton Blue clade, with rela-
tively high bootstrap and jackknife support. It is proba-
bly not a new cultivar, but a morphological variant of this
cultivar. SAG. 13 and Harrismith seem to follow the
same pattern. There is, however, no substantial support
for this grouping. Of the other potential new cultivars,
SAG. 02-SAG. 05 fonn a monophyletic clade and SAG. 06
+ SAG.09-SAG.il form another monophyletic cluster.
When comparing the fingerprinting patterns for the dif-
ferent specimens, the close affinities between specimens
SAG. 02, SAG. 03, SAG. 04 and SAG. 05 (Figure 1; Table
2) were also evident. The groupings SAG. 02-SAG. 04
and SAG. 09 + SAG.l 1 probably represent two potential
new cultivars, with the variation within the clades being
so small as to indicate that the specimens in each cluster
are probably the same cultivar. These close affinities are
corroborated by the bootstrap and jackknife support val-
ues within these groups, which are 100% and 80-85%
respectively. The other members of these clades, SAG. 05
and SAG. 10 + SAG. 06, are probably closely related vari-
ant forms. The distances within some of the existing cul-
tivars are very large, which indicate large levels of genet-
ic variation within these cultivars. This is especially true
for the two cultivars Bayview and Silverton Blue. This is
corroborated by the variability in fragment patterning
observed in the different specimens for these cultivars.
These results, in which these two cultivars are clearly
non-monophyletic, might indicate that either the taxono-
my of these cultivars are confused or the samples are in
fact not purebred cultivars any more. The last possibility
is very feasible in this group of grasses that constitute a
heterogeneous group of varieties with considerable geno-
typic as well as phenotypic variation and in which out-
crossing is frequent. The other duplicated cultivars fonn
distinct groupings with high support bootstrap values for
Cape Royal and Tifdwarf (97% and 92% respectively).
Florida also exhibits some variability but not to the same
extent as Silverton Blue and Bayview.
The number of specimens studied per cultivar was
only two, due to the preliminary nature of the study. By
increasing this number, the variability within cultivars
can be investigated in more detail.
Very small genetic differences can be detected with
RAPDs. In some cases these differences may include
only a single DNA change. A single difference in the
fragmenting patterns of different specimens does, there-
fore, not indicate separate cultivar status. It was, howev-
er, possible to distinguish between the different Cynodon
cultivars with the RAPD fingerprinting patterns. More
primers included and more samples per cultivar, would
help to further resolve relationships, especially where the
status of a cultivar is uncertain.
Although the reproducibility of this RAPD technique
can be influenced by factors that may vary, such as tem-
plate quantity and primer structure (Kernodle et al. 1 993;
Multani & Lyon 1995), the use of a standardized RAPD
protocol and sufficient replication can ensure repro-
ducible RAPD patterns (Multani & Lyon 1995).
Furthermore, all reactions were always amplified simul-
taneously, and found to be repeatable across different
amplification times.
These markers have the potential to be employed as
genetic fingerprints for future identification.
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicated that different Cynodon cultivars
differ genetically, and these variations can be determined
by RAPDs.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
121
The only two specimens with a similar fragmenting
pattern, irrespective of the primer used, were SAG. 03
and SAG. 04. However, these specimens show similar
patterns to SAG. 02 and SAG. 05 with most primers. This
indicates that these four specimens are genetically very
similar and could well be the same cultivar. This was
reflected by the neighbour-joining analysis where
SAG. 02-SAG. 05 and SAG.06 + SAG.09-SAG.il form
definite monophyletic groups with the clusters
SAG. 02-SAG. 04 and SAG. 09 + SAG. 1 1, which appear
to be new cultivars. This is supported by bootstrap and
jackknife values and very little variance within these
clusters. SAG. 13 appears to be related to the Harrismith
cultivar and SAG. 01 to the Silverton Blue cultivar.
Furthermore, the variability within existing cultivars
was very high in some instances, questioning their status
as true cultivars. Due to the variable nature of the species
it is very difficult to recognize the different cultivars of
these turf grasses vegetatively, especially when they are
frequently cut on lawns, bowling greens or golfing
greens. This complicates the unequivocal identification
of these cultivars.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The University of the Free State, the National
Research Foundation, and Top Crop Nurseries are
thanked for financial assistance during this study.
REFERENCES
BAI. D., BRANDLE, J. & REELEDER. R. 1997. Genetic diversity in
North American ginseng ( Panax quinquefolius L.) grown in
Ontario detected by RAPD analysis. Genome 40: 1 1 1-115.
BARANEK. M„ STIFT. G„ VOLLMANN, J. & LELLEY. T. 2000.
Genetic diversity within and between the species Cucurbita
pepo , C. moschata and C. maxima as revealed by RAPD mark-
ers. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 23: 73—77.
BARCACCIA, G.. MAZZUCATO, A.. BELARDINELLI, A.. PEZ-
ZOTT1. M., LUCRETTI. S. & FALCINELL1, M. 1997.
Inheritance of parental genomes in progenies of Poa pratensis
L. from sexual and apomictic genotypes as assessed by RAPD
markers and flow cytometry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics
95: 516-524.
BARKER. J.H.A., MATTHES, M., ARNOLD, G.M., EDWARDS,
K.J., AHMAN. I., LARSSON. S. & KARP. A. 1999. Characte-
rization of genetic diversity in potential biomass willows (Salix
spp.) by RAPD and AFLP analyses. Genome 42: 173-183.
BRUMMER, E.C.. BOUTON. J.H. & KOCHERT, G. 1995. Analysis of
the annual Medicago species using RAPD markers. Genome 38:
362-367.
BUSEY, P„ DUDECK. A., GUY, C. & HARRISON, N. 1996.
Distinguishing off-types of Tifway and Tifdwarf bermudagrass.
The Florida Green, Summer : 50-53.
CAETANO-ANOLLES, G„ BASSAM, B.J. & GRESSHOFF. PM.
1991. DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbi-
trary oligonucleotide primers. Bio/Technology 9: 553-557.
CARLSON, J.E., TULSIERAM. L.K., GLAUBITZ, J.C., LUK,
V.W.K.. KAUFFELDT, C. & RUTLEDGE. R. 1991.
Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in FI progeny
of conifers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 194-200.
EDWARDS. K., JOHNSTONE, C. & THOMPSON, C. 1991 . A simple
and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for
PCR analysis , Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349.
FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an
approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON, L„ KOEKEMOER, M„ SMOOK,
L„ BARKER, N.P. ANDERSON. H.M. & DALLWITZ. M.J.
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 58: 1-437.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R.C., DANNEBERGER, T.K. & SWEENEY, P.M.
1997. Potential of RAPD markers for use in the identification of
creeping bentgrass cultivars. Crop Science 37: 212-214.
GWANAMA. C.. LABUSCHAGNE, M.T. & BOTHA. A-M. 2000.
Analysis of genetic variation in Curcubita moschata by random
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Euphytica 1 13: 19-26.
HARADA ,T„ MATSUKAWA, K„ SATO, T„ ISH1KAWA. R.. NIIZE-
KI, M. & SAITO, K. 1993. DNA-RAPD’s detect genetic varia-
tion and paternity in Mains. Euphytica 65: 87-91.
HILU, K.W. 1995. Evolution of finger millet: evidence from random
amplified polymorphic DNA. Genome 38: 232-238.
HOWELL, E.C., NEWBURY, H.J., SWENNEN, R.L., WITHERS,
L.A. & FORD-LLOYD, B.V. 1994. The use of RAPD for iden-
tifying and classifying Musa germplasni. Genome 37: 328-332.
HUFF, D.R. 1997. RAPD characterization of heterogeneous perennial
ryegrass cultivars. Crop Science 37: 557-564.
HUFF. D.R. & BARA, J.M. 1993. Determining genetic origins of aber-
rant progeny from facultative apomictic Kentucky bluegrass
using a combination of flow cytometry and silver-stained
RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 201-208.
HUFF, D.R., PEAKALL. R„ & SMOUSE, P.E. 1993. RAPD marker
variation in outcrossing buffalograss. Theoretical and Applied
Genetics 86: 927-934.
KERNODLE, S.P., CANNON, R E. & SCANDALIOS, J.G. 1993.
Concentration of primer and template qualitatively affects prod-
ucts in random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR. BioTech-
niques 14: 362-364.
KLEIN-LANKHORST, R.M., VERMUNT, A.. WEIDE, R.. LIHARS-
KA, T. & TABEL, P. 1991. Isolation of molecular markers for
tomato (L. esculentum) using random amplified polymorphic
DNA (RAPD). Theoretical and Applied Genetics %'S'. 108-114.
LANTER1. S„ D1 LEO, I.. LEDDA, L„ MAMELI. M.G. & PORTIS,
E. 2001. RAPD variation within and among populations of
globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) cv. "Spinoso sardo’.
Plant Breeding 120: 243-246.
LANYON, S.M. 1985. Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance
data. Systematic Zoology 34: 397-403.
MARILLIA. E.F. & SCOLES, G.J. 1996. The use of RAPD markers in
Hordeum phylogeny. Genome 39: 646-654.
MARSAN. P.A., EG1DY, G„ MONFREDIN1, G„ DI SILVESTRO, S.
& MOTTO. M. 1993. RAPD markers in maize genetic analysis.
Maydica 38: 259-264.
MICHELMORE, R.W., PARAN, I. & KESSELL, R.V. 1991.
Identification of markers linked to disease resistance genes by
bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in
specific genomic regions using segregating populations.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 88:
9828-9832.
MULTAN1, D.S. & LYON, B.R. 1995. Genetic fingerprinting of
Australian cotton cultivars with RAPD markers. Genome 38:
1005-1008.
OHMURA. T„ SASAKUMA, T. & KANEKO. S. 1997. Identification
of Poa pratensis L. and Agrostis spp. cultivars by random
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. International
Turfgrass Society Research Journal 8: 359-366.
PARANI, M„ LAKSHMI, M.. ELANGO. S„ RAM, N., ANURATHA,
C.S. & PARIDA, A. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of mangroves
II. Intra- and interspecific variation in Avicennia revealed by
RAPD and RFLP markers. Genome 40: 487 — 495.
SUN, G.L., DIAZ, 0„ SOLOMON, B. & VON BOTHMER, R. 1999.
Genetic diversity in Elymus caninus as revealed by isozyme.
RAPD and microsatellite markers. Genome 42: 420 — 43 1 .
SWEENEY, P.M. & DANNEBERGER, T.K. 1994. Random amplified
polymorphic DNA in perennial ryegrass: a comparison of
bulked samples versus individuals. Horticultural Science 29:
624-626.
SWEENEY. P.M. & DANNEBERGER, T.K. 1995. RAPD characteri-
zation of Poa annua L. populations in golf course greens and
fairways. Crop Science 35: 1676-1680.
SWEENEY, P.M. & DANNEBERGER, T.K. 1996. Restriction diges-
tion of arbitrary fragments of annual bluegrass. Crop Science
36: 1301-1303.
SWEENEY, PM. & DANNEBERGER, T.K. 1997. RAPD markers
from perennial ryegrass extracted from seeds. Horticultural
Science 32: 1212-1215.
122
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
SWOBODA. 1. & BHALLA. P.L. 1997. RAPD analysis of genetic variation
in the Australian fan flower, Scaevola. Genome 40: 600-606.
SWOFFORD, D.L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsi-
mony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland, Massachusetts.
THORMANN, C.E., FERREIRA. M.E., CAMARGO, L.E.A.,
TIVANG, J.G. & OSBORN, T.C. 1994. Comparison of RFLP
and RAPD markers to estimating genetic relationships within
and among Cruciferous species. Theoretical and Applied
Genetics 88: 973-980.
VAN BUREN, R„ HARPER, K.T., ANDERSEN, W.R., STANTON,
D.J., SEYOUM, S. & ENGLAND, J.L. 1994. Evaluating the
relationship of autumn buttercup ( Ranunculus acriformis var.
aestivalis) to some close congeners using random amplified
polymorphic DNA. American Journal of Botany 81: 514-519.
VIERLING. R.A & NGUYEN, H.T. 1992. Use of RAPD markers to
determine genetic diversity of diploid wheat genotypes.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 835-838.
WACHIRA, F.N., WAUGH, R„ HACKETT, C.A. & POWELL, W.
1995. Detection of genetic diversity in tea (Camellia sinensis)
using RAPD markers. Genome 38: 201-210.
WELSH, .1. & MCCLELLAND. M. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes
using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Research 18:
7213-7218.
WELSH, J„ HONEYCUTT, R.J., McCLELLAND, M. & SOBRAL,
B.W.S. 1991. Parentage determination in maize hybrids using
the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR).
Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 473 — 476.
WILLIAMS, G.K., KUBELIK, A.R.. L1VAK, K.L, RAFALSK1, J.A. &
TINGEY, S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbi-
trary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids
Research 18: 6531-6535.
YU, K„ VAN DEYNZE, A. & PAULS, K.P. 1993. Random amplified
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. In B.R. Glick & J.E.
Thompson, Methods in plant molecular biolog y and biotech-
nologyCRC Press, Boca Raton.
Bothalia 32,1: 123-126 (2002)
Miscellaneous notes
POACEAE
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 16. POLYPLOIDY IN THE GENUS EHRHARTA
The genus Ehrharta Thunb. comprises ± 36 species of
which 20 are endemic to the winter rainfall area of South
Africa (Verboom 2000). The genus belongs to the tribe
Ehrharteae, which has been shuffled between the
Phalarideae and the Oryzeae, the Ehrharteae and
Arundineae of the Arundinoideae, the Ehrharteae of the
Oryzoideae, and the Ehrharteae and the Oryzaneae of the
Bambusoideae (Gibbs Russell & Ellis 1987). Recently
the Ehrharteae was moved from the Arundinoideae
(Renvoize 1981) to the Bambusoideae (Renvoize 1985;
Watson et al. 1985). Linder & Ellis (1990) found no
other representatives of the Bambusoideae present in the
Fynbos Biome. Inclusion of the tribe Ehrharteae in the
Bambusoideae rests on the presence of non-anatomical
characters such as bambusoid embryos and lodicules
(Renvoize 1985; Clayton & Renvoize 1986). Currently
the Ehrharteae forms part of the BEP’ clade
(Bambusoideae, Ehrhartoideae and Pooideae) in grass
phylogenetics (Clark et al. 1995).
The presence of many endemic species and the
absence of any close relatives to Ehrharta in South
Africa, may present us with some answers to the forma-
tion of polyploidy in grasses. Polyploidy is a common
phenomenon among the grasses and Stebbins (1985) sug-
gested that more than 80% of species in this family have
undergone some form of polyploidy somewhere in their
evolutionary history. In an attempt to determine the
degree of polyploidy in South African grasses, our labora-
tory has studied chromosome numbers of various grasses
and the results were mostly published in this series.
One of the genera that has been extensively studied, is
the genus Ehrharta. Various chromosome number reports
for the genus Ehrharta have been published (Avdulov
1931; Nakamori 1933; Parthasarathy 1939; Love 1948;
Stebbins 1949; Raven et al. 1965; Tateoka 1965;
Fernandes & Queiros 1969; Stebbins 1985; Spies & Du
Plessis 1986; Hoshino & Davidse 1988; Spies & Voges
1988; Spies et al. 1989). This report includes additional
results from collections from 37 populations, representing
nine different species or subspecies and includes first
counts for three species and one subspecies. These new
counts are combined with the published results (in total
more than 100 specimens have been studied) in an attempt
to determine the degree of polyploidy within this genus.
FIGURE 1. — Meiotic chromosomes
in Ehrharta. A, E. longifolia.
Spies 6157. 2n = 3x = 36,
early anaphase I with a 15-21
segregation of chromosomes
and even some chromatid seg-
regation. B-D, E. thunbergii,
Spies 6031 , 2n = 6x = 72: B,
diakinesis and early anaphase
I with 36 chromosomes seg-
regating towards each pole
(not all chromosomes visible
on the focus plane of photo).
E-I, E. villosa subsp. maxi-
ma, Spies 6193, 2n = 8x = 96:
E. diakinesis; F-H, early
anaphase I, showing ± 48
chromosomes segregating
towards each pole (a few
cases of chromatid segrega-
tion can be observed and all
chromosomes are not visible
on this focus plane); I, late
anaphase I, showing several
laggards. Scale bar for A-I:
6.5 pm.
124
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
TABLE 1 . — Gametic chromosome numbers of representatives of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa with their voucher specimen numbers
and specific localities or a reference to the publication where the chromosome number was described. Species are listed alphabetically under the
species groups of Gibbs Russell & Ellis (1987) and the localities are presented according to the system described by Edwards & Leistner (1971)
Taxon n Voucher no. Locality or reference
Calycina Group
E. brevifolia Schrad. var. brevifolia 12
E. brevifolia Schrad. var. cuspidata Nees 12+0- IB
E. calycina J.E.Sm. 12 Spies 5937, 5938
Spies 5950 , 5952,
5953
Spies 6043
Spies 5975
Spies 5977
Spies 6038
Spies 5984
Spies 5990, 5995
Spies 6013
Spies 6260, 6261.
6262, 6265
Spies 6082, 6322,
6323, 6326-,
Spies 6063, 6317
Spies 6253
Spies 6211
Spies 6156
12+0-2B
24+0-2B
Spies et al. (1989).
Spies et al. ( 1989).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): 5 km from Kamieskroon
to Leliehoek in the Kamiesberg Pass, (-DB).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): 8 km from Kamieskroon
to Leliehoek on top of Kamiesberg Pass, (-DB).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 77 km from Clanwilliam to
Nieuwoudtville, (-CB).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 8 km from Doring Bay to
Lambert’s Bay, (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 17 km from Doring Bay
to Lambert’s Bay, (-CD).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): 32 km from Clanwilliam
to Nieuwoudtville, (-AA).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): 40 km from Clanwilliam
to Lambert's Bay, (-BA).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): 10 km from Clanwilliam
to Nieuwoudtville, (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): 14 km from Clanwilliam
to Nieuwoudtville, (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Leipoldt's grave on
top of Pakhuis Pass, (-CC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3219 (Wuppertal): 6 km from Algeria to Citrus-
dal on top of Nieuwoudt Pass, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): on top of Uitkyk Pass, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 3 km E from Mamre Road,
(-BC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3420 (Bredasdorp): 1 km N of De Hoop Nature
Reserve, (-BA).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): 13 km from Uniondale to
Oudtshoorn, (-CA).
Love ( 1948); Spies & Du Plessis ( 1986); Spies et al. ( 1989).
Parthasarathy ( 1939); Love ( 1948); Spies & Voges ( 1988); Spies et al.
(1989).
Spies et al. (1989).
Hoshino & Davidse ( 1988).
Spies et al. (1989).
Spies & Voges ( 1988); Spies et al. (1989).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): near Leipoldt’s grave on
top of Pakhuis Pass, (-CC).
Spies et al. ( 1989).
Uncounted.
Spies et al. (1989).
Uncounted.
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): 5 km from Uniondale to
Oudtshoorn, (-CA).
Uncounted.
Spies et al. (1989).
Llncounted.
Tateoka (1965).
Avdulov (1931); Parthasarathy (1939); Stebbins (1949); Raven et al.
(1965); Fernandes & Queiros (1969); Stebbins (1985); Spies & Du
Plessis (1986); Hoshino & Davidse (1988); Spies et al. (1989).
Nakamori (1933); Stebbins (1949, 1985); Spies & Du Plessis (1986).
Spies etal. (1989).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): on top of Nieuwoudts Pass, (-AC).
Spies et al. ( 1989).
Parthasarathy ( 1939); Spies et al. (1989).
Spies et al. ( 1989).
Spies etal. (1989).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3219 (Wuppertal): on top of Uitkyk Pass, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3322 (Oudtshoorn): Swartberg Pass, (-AC).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3419 (Caledon): Galgeberg. (-BA).
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
125
TABLE 1. — Gametic chromosome numbers of representatives of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa with their voucher specimen numbers
and specific localities or a reference to the publication where the chromosome number was described. Species are listed alphabetically under the
species groups of Gibbs Russell & Ellis ( 1 987 ) and the localities are presented according to the system described by Edwards & Leistner (1971)
(continued)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this study, cytogenetic material of identical plants of
a population was collected and fixed in the field. Voucher
specimens listed in Table 1 are housed in the Geo Potts
Herbarium. Department of Botany and Genetics, University
of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein (BLFU). The
National Herbarium, Pretoria, identified the plants.
Anthers were squashed in aceto-carmine and meioti-
cally analysed (Spies et al. 1996). Gametic chromosome
numbers are presented for meiotic chromosomes to con-
form to previous work on chromosome numbers (Spies
& Du Plessis 1986). Previously published somatic chro-
mosome numbers are transformed to gametic numbers
for convenience.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Thirty-seven populations, representing nine species or
subspecies, were studied (Table 1). All numbers support
a basic chromosome number of 12 (Stebbins 1949; Spies
et al. 1989). The majority of populations studied (93.6%)
were diploid (2n = 2x = 24), with one triploid specimen,
E. longifolia-. 2n = 3x= 36 (Figure 1A); one hexaploid, E.
thunbergii : 2n = 6x = 72 (Figure 1B-D); and one octo-
ploid, E. villosa var. maxima : 2n = 8x = 96 (Figure 1E-I).
Ehrharta longifolia is, to the best of our knowledge, the
first triploid Ehrharta sample ever observed. Meiosis in
this specimen was usually abnormal with numerous uni-
valents, chromatid segregation during anaphase I, chro-
mosome/chromatid laggards and micronuclei present.
This is unfortunately the first chromosome count for this
species and more individuals from more populations of
this species should be investigated to determine the real
chromosome number of this species.
In addition to our count for E. longifolia , we also report
the first counts for E. ramosa subsp. aphylla (2n = 2x = 24),
E. thunbergii (2n = 6x = 72) and E. villosa var. maxima (2n
= 8x = 96). When all chromosome numbers are compared,
two interesting phenomena emerge. There are no counts for
any member of the Setacea Group (in spite of numerous
collections by our laboratory, no successful preparations
were made) and all three counts for the Villosa Group are
polyploids. Additional populations should be studied to
determine whether this whole group consists of high ploidy
levels and whether it represents hybrids (alloploids)
between representatives of other groups.
The majority of populations studied (more than 97%)
suggest a basic chromosome number of x = 1 2 for
Ehrharta. However, basic chromosome numbers higher
than nine are secondarily derived basic numbers
(Goldblatt 1980). It is also well known that most bambu-
soids have a secondary basic chromosome number of 12
(Stebbins 1985). Stebbins (1985) suggested that poly-
ploidy follows one of four different ways in grasses.
Ehrharta forms part of Stebbins' third mode of poly-
ploidy— ‘multiples of a basic number that is the lowest in
its genus, but was probably derived from that of pre-exist-
ing genera by a cycle of polyploidy in the remote past’.
An example of this mode is given as Leersia Sw., anoth-
er member of the Bambusoideae (Stebbins 1985). The
genus Ehrharta is consequently of ancient polyploid ori-
gin and the basic chromosome number of x = 12 can be
described as a secondary basic chromosome number.
126
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
Polyploid level
FIGURE 2. — Number of specimens per ploidy level for all Ehrharta
specimens studied.
This paper began by mentioning that more than 80%
of grasses are polyploids; the question remains whether
the initial polyploidization of the basic chromosome
number in Ehrharta enhanced or inhibited further poly-
ploidization events. All chromosome numbers observed
for Ehrharta populations indicate that 82.8% are
'diploid' (Figure 2). This dramatic decrease from 80%
polyploidy in grasses to more than 80% diploidy in
Ehrharta indicates that the initial polyploidization
event probably inhibited the consequent formation of
polyploidy in the genus. However, the frequency of
polyploidy varies in different taxa and this conclusion
should be studied further in order to determine whether
the decrease in secondary polyploidization is a general
phenomenon or specific to the genus Ehrharta. The
influence of climatic and geographical factors on poly-
ploidization is not fully understood, therefore, we did
not compare these results with chromosome numbers of
other bambusoids, since no other bambusoids grow
sympatrically with Ehrharta.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial assistance given by the University of the
Orange Free State and the National Research Foundation
is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
AVDULOV, N.R 1931. Karyosystematic studies in the grass family.
The Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding
Suppl. 44: 1-352.
CLARK. L.G., ZANG. W. & WENDEL. J.F. 1995. A phylogeny of the
grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Syste-
matic Botany 20: 436-460.
CLAYTON. W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum:
grasses of the world. Kew Bulletin Add. Ser. XIII: 1-389.
EDWARDS. D. & LEISTNER. O.A. 1971. A degree reference system
for citing biological records in southern Africa. Mitteilungen
der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 10: 501-509.
FERNANDES. A. & QUEIROS. M. 1969. Contribution a la connais-
sance cytotaxinomique des Spermatophyta du Portugal. I.
Gramineae. Boletim Sociedade Broteriana 43: 3-140.
GIBBS RUSSELL. G.E. & ELLIS, R.P 1987. Species groups in the
genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 51-65.
GOLDBLATT. P. 1980. Polyploidy in angiosperms: monocotyledons.
In W.H. Lewis. Polyploidy: biological relevance. Plenum Press,
New York.
HOSHINO. T. & DAVIDSE, G. 1988. Chromosome numbers of grass-
es (Poaceae) from southern Africa. I. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Gardens 75: 866-873.
LINDER, H.P. & ELLIS, R.P. 1990. Vegetative morphology and inter-
fire survival strategies in the Cape Fynbos grasses. Bothalia 20:
91-103.
LOVE. R.M. 1948. Preliminary cytological studies of Ehrharta calyci-
na Smith. American Journal of Botany 35: 358-360.
NAKAMORI, E. 1933. On the occurrence of the tetraploid plant of
rice, Oryza sativa L. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of
Japan 9: 340.
PARTHASARATHY, N. 1939. Cytogenetical studies in Oryzeae and
Phalarideae III. Cytological studies in Phalarideae. Annals of
Botany 3: 43-77.
PIENAAR, R.d.V. 1955. The chromosome numbers of some indige-
nous South African and introduced Gramineae. In C. Meredith.
The grasses and pastures of South Africa. Central News
Agency, Cape Town.
RAVEN. P.H.. KYHOS. D.W. & HILL, A.J. 1965. Chromosome num-
bers of spermatophytes. mostly Californian. Aliso 6: 105-1 13.
RENVOIZE, S.A. 1981. The subfamily Arundinoideae and its position
in relation to a general classification of the Gramineae. Kew
Bulletin 36: 85-H)2.
RENVOIZE. S.A. 1985. A survey of leaf-blade anatomy in grasses. V.
The bamboo allies. Kew Bulletin 40: 509-535.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269, 270.
SPIES. J.J. & VOGES. S.P. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 7. Bothalia 18: 114-119.
SPIES, J.J.. SAAYMAN, E.J.L.. VOGES. S.P. & DAVIDSE. G. 1989.
Chromosome studies on African plants. 9. Chromosome num-
bers in Ehrharta (Poaceae: Ehrharteae). Bothalia 19: 125-132.
SPIES, J.J.. SPIES, S.K., VAN WYK, S.M.C., MALAN, A.F. &
LIEBENBERG, E.J.L. 1996. Cytogenetic studies of the sub-
family Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 1. The tribe
Aveneae, subtribe Aveninae. Bothalia 26: 53-61 .
STEBBINS, G.L. 1949. The evolutionary significance of natural and
artificial polyploids in the family Gramineae. Proceedings of
the 8th International Congress of Genetics (Hereditas, Suppl.
vol.)\ 462—485.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1985. Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of
new habitats. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 72:
824-832.
TATEOKA. T. 1965. Chromosome numbers of some East African
grasses. American Journal of Botany 52: 864-869.
VERBOOM, A.V. 2000. Ehrharta. In P. Goldblatt & J. Manning, Cape
plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia
9: 183-185.
WATSON, L.. CLIFFORD. H.T. & DALLW1TZ, M.J. 1985. The clas-
sification of Poaceae: subfamilies and supertribes. Australian
Journal of Botany 33: 433-484.
J.J. SPIES*. M.M. VAN DYK* and S.M.C. VAN WYK*
* Department of Botany and Genetics (106). University of the Orange
Free State, P.O. Box 339. 9300 Bloemfontein.
MS. received: 2001-03-23.
Bothalia 32.1: 127-130 (2002)
OBITUARY
ANNA AMELIA OBERMEYER-MAUVE ( 1907-2001 )
Anna Amelia Obermeyer (Figure 1) was born in
Pretoria on 30 July 1907. She matriculated (completed
her schooling) at Oost Eind School, Pretoria, in 1925,
and then attended the Transvaal University College (now
Pretoria University), obtaining the degrees of B.Sc. in
1928 and M.Sc. in 1931. In May 1929 she was appoint-
ed botanist in the Transvaal Museum, a post she held
until August 1938, when she married Mr Anton Mauve (a
collateral descendant of the artist Vincent van Gogh).
Before World War II and for many years afterwards, mar-
riage meant exchanging a paid professional career for
that of a housewife, and this Mrs Mauve did until 1
December 1957, when she joined the staff of the
National Herbarium. In effect, she returned to her former
post, as the botanical collections of the Transvaal
Museum were transferred to the National Herbarium in
1953 (Fourie 1998) (Figure 2). This time, she was placed
in charge of the petaloid monocots, and remained until
she reached pensionable age on 30 July 1972. After an
overseas holiday with her husband, she returned in a
temporary capacity on 30 October 1972. ‘Temporary’ in
this instance acquired an air of pennanence, and she was
promoted to Temporary Senior Agricultural Researcher
on 1 April 1984. She finally retired on 31 August 1985,
moved to Pinelands (Cape Town), and passed away
peacefully on 10 October 2001.
She studied under Professor C.E.B. Bremekamp at the
University of Pretoria, and so was well trained to under-
take taxonomic research. At the Transvaal Museum she
put this training to good use, and worked mainly on
Acanthaceae, producing revisions of Barleria, Blepharis
and Petalidium. In addition, she wrote up large collec-
tions of plants from the Vemay-Lang expedition to the
Kalahari and by Herbert Lang in the Kruger National
Park. These were among the first accounts of the flora of
these regions. She participated with Prof. Schweickerdt
and Miss Verdoom in an expedition to the Soutpansberg
Salt Pan. and was senior author of the resultant published
account of specimens collected.
On her return to botany in 1957, she commenced work
on the petaloid monocots. The bulk of her publications
list from this period is made up of descriptions of indi-
vidual new species, texts for plates published in
Flowering Plants of Africa and brief nomenclatural notes.
However, she also completed revisions of Anthericum
and its immediate allies, Dipcadi and Lagarosiphon. Her
service at the Botanical Research Institute coincided with
the most active period of production of the Flora of
southern Africa , and it was stated in the citation for her
award of the South African Association of Botanists
(SAAB) senior medal for botany, that she had made more
contributions to that project than any other botanist. This
record still stands, and will probably continue to do so, as
National Botanical Institute priorities are now elsewhere,
and Flora accounts are sought from a much wider pool of
botanists than was the case forty years ago.
Where possible, Mrs Mauve made a point of seeing
the plants she described in the field. In the course of field
expeditions ranging from the massive one to the
Soutpansberg, down to brief trips of a few hours, she col-
lected some 4 000 specimens. She collected not only in
South Africa, but also on a pioneering expedition to the
Eastern Highlands of Rhodesia (now Mutare and
Chipinge Districts of Zimbabwe) with Dr V. FitzSimons
in 1937. Her specimens are housed in PRE, with dupli-
cates sent to other herbaria as part of the PRE exchange
programme and so almost impossible to trace.
For many years she was a member of the council of the
South African Biological Society, and edited their journal
for part of that time. She was a foundation member of
SAAB, and a member of AETFAT (Association pour TE-
tude Taxonomique de la Flore d'Afrique Tropicale) and
S2A3 (the South African Association for the Advancement
of Science), whose meetings served the function of bring-
ing botanists together before SAAB was founded.
De Winter & Killick (1982) described her in their
motivation for the SAAB award as “one of those self-
effacing but completely dedicated ‘backroom girls’ of
science". This fits well with the memories of those who
FIGURE 1. — Anna Amelia Mauve, nee Obermeyer (1907-2001).
Photo: NB1 archive.
128
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
FIGURE 2. — From left to right: Mrs
Mauve. Dr E.R Phillips, Mrs
R. Pott-Leendertz, Miss I.C.
Verdoom, at the ceremony for
the presentation of the Trans-
vaal Museum Herbarium to
the National Herbarium, 10
September 1953. Photo: NBI
archive.
had the privilege of meeting her in the old Botanical
Research Institute. Her knowledge of the petaloid
monocots was encyclopaedic, and she shared it with the
young freely, but in a very kindly way. The motivation
referred to above also mentions the many thousands of
identifications she did for other scientists, and her cura-
torial activities. Indeed, twenty years after that motiva-
tion was written, her curation of the monocot specimens
is still much in evidence. Although most of this evidence
is positive, it has to be admitted that some features of
late-twentieth century taxonomic practice passed her by.
For example, she apparently never understood the full
implications of the idea that PRECIS records of re-iden-
tified specimens needed to be updated before the speci-
mens were re-filed. Even today it is not unknown to find
an irate member of curatorial staff in the monocots,
annoyed at having unearthed yet another Tost' specimen
that was simply re-filed under a new name by Mrs
Mauve, who had not informed the computer. However,
she was, until the day she finally left the Institute, ‘gen-
erous to a fault with assistance rendered to all who have
approached her’, to quote again from De Winter and
Killick’s motivation.
Volume 42 of The Flowering Plants of Africa
(1970-1972) was dedicated to her. In 1983 she was
awarded the SAAB Senior Medal for Botany. Part 6 of
volume 53 of South African Journal of Botany bears a
dedication to Mrs Mauve, and is made up chiefly of
papers on groups in which she was interested.
Mrs Mauve is commemorated in the plant names
Hemizygia obermeyerae Ashby, Asparagus obermeyerae
Jessop, Barleria ameliae A.Meeuse and Lachenalia
ameliae W.F.Barker.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks are due to Dr O.A. Leistner for reading and
commenting on a draft of this obituary.
REFERENCES
DE WINTER, B. & KILLICK. D.J.B. 1982. Motivation for nomination
of \-trs Mauve for 1982 SAAB Senior Medal for Botany.
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria. Unpublished: copy in
Botanical Exploration archive, file Mauve A. A.
FOURIE, D.M.C. 1998. The history of the Botanical Research Institute
1903-1989. Bothalia 28: 217-297.
PUBLICATIONS BY A.A. OBERMEYER-MAUVE
BREMEKAMP, C.E.B. & OBERMEYER, A.A. 1935. Sertum Kala-
hariense, a list of the plants collected. Annals of the Transvaal
Museum 16: 399^142.
ELLIS, R.P., MANDERS, R. & OBERMEYER, A.A. 1979. Ana-
tomical observations on the peduncle of Xyris capensis
(Xyridaceae). Bothalia 12: 637-639.
LEWIS, G.J., OBERMEYER, A.A. & BARNARD, T.T. 1972. Gladio-
lus: a revision of the South African species. Journal of South
African Botany, Suppl. vol. 10: 1-316.
LEWIS, .1. & OBERMEYER, A.A. 1985. Xyridaceae. Flora of south-
ern Africa 4,2: I -8.
MAUVE, A.A. 1966a. Flowering aquatic plants in South Africa. Fauna
& Flora 17: 19-23.
1966b. Resurrection plants. Fauna & Flora 17: 26-31.
1967. Water-lilies in South Africa. Fauna & Flora 18: 31-35.
1968. The yellow waterlily of the Vaal River. Fauna & Flora 19: 24.
1973-74. [21 botanical entries]. Standard Encyclopedia of southern
Africa, vols 8-10. Nasou, Cape Town.
1975. [5 botanical entries]. Standard Encyclopedia of southern
Africa, vol. 1 1 . Nasou, Cape Town.
OBERMEYER, A.A. 1933a. Notes on the distribution of Copaifera
mopane Kirk. South African Journal of Science 30: 266-269.
- 1933b. A revision of the South African species of Barleria. Annals of
the Transvaal Museum 15: 123-180.
- 1934. Addenda and corrigenda to the revision of the South African
species of Barleria. Journal of Botany, London 72: 275-278.
- 1936a. A revision of the South African species of Petalidium. Annals
of the Transvaal Museum 18: 151 162.
- 1936b. A new tumbleweed from South Africa. Journal of South
African Botany 2: 187-189.
1937a. A preliminary list of plants collected in the Kruger National
Park. Annals of the Transvaal Museum 17: 185-227.
-1937b. The South African species of Blepliaris. Annals of the
Transvaal Museum 19: 105-139.
- 1959. Petalidium hractealum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 33: t.
1317.
- 1960. Choananthus cyrtanthiflorus. The Flowering Plants of Africa
34: t. 1340.
1961a. Notes and new records of South African plants: Barleria
argil/icola Oberm. Bothalia 1: 444, 445.
Bothalia 32.1 (2002)
129
- 1961b. Notes and new records of South African plants: Barleria sax-
atilis Oberm. Bothalia 7: 445, 446.
- 1961c. Notes and new records of South African plants: Liliaceae.
Bothalia 7: 481-483.
- 196 Id. Iphigenia and Camptorrhiza in South Africa. Kirkia 1: 84-87.
- 1 96 1 e. Kentrosiphon saccatus subsp. steingroeveri. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 34: t. 1354.
- 196 If. Petalidium nibescens. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34: t.
1355.
- 1 96 1 g. Veltheimia capensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 34: t.
1356.
- 1962a. A revision of the South African species of Anthericum,
Chlorophytum and Trachyandra. Bothalia 7: 669-767 .
- 1962b. Notes and new records of South African plants: Iridaceae.
Bothalia 8: 115, 116.
- 1962c. Duvernoia adhatodoides. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35:
t. 1375.
- 1962d. Gladiolus woodii forma. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35:
t. 1378.
- 1962e. Pillansia templemannii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35: t.
1381.
- 1962f. Moraea polystachya. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35: t.
1385.
- 1962g. Chlorophytum aridum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35: t.
1399.
- 1962h. Anapalina caffra. The Flowering Plants of Africa 35: t. 1400.
- 1963a. A new Haemanthus and a new Tritonia from southern Africa.
Kirkia 3: 22-24.
- 1963b. Hessea tenella. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t. 1413.
- 1964a. Aponogeton. Journal of the Limnological Society’ of South
Afi-ica 1: 12, 13.
- 1964b. Free-floating aquatics. Journal of the Limnological Society’ of
South Africa 1: 34, 35.
- 1964c. The South African species of Dipcadi. Bothalia 8: 1 17-137.
- 1964d. The South African species of Lagarosiphon. Bothalia 8:
139-146.
- 1964e. The South African species of Anthericum, Chlorophytum and
Trachyandra. Addenda and corrigenda. Bothalia 8: 147, 148.
- 1964f. Barleria rotundifolia. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t.
1426.
- 1964g. Burmannia madagascariensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa
36: t. 1427.
- 1964h. Gethyllis britteniana. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t.
1428. ’
- 1964i. Dipcadi papillatum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 36: t.
1429.
- 1965a. Polamogeton. Journal of the Limnological Society of South
Africa 2: 27-35.
- 1965b. Aponogeton junceus subsp. natalense. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 37: t. 1449.
- 1965c. Whiteheadia bifolia. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t.
1450.
- 1965d. Massonia grandiflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t.
1451.
- 1965e. Haemanthus pole-evansii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37:
t. 1452.
- 1966a. A note on two rarely seen minute flowering plants, Wolfiella
denticulata and W. welwitschii (Lemnaceae). South African
Journal of Science 62: 277, 278.
- 1966b. [Helobiae:] Potamogetonaceae, Ruppiaceae, Zannichellia-
ceae, Aponogetonaceae, Juncaginaceae, Alismataceae, Hydro-
charitaceae. Flora of southern Africa 1: 57-112.
- 1966c. Mrs Reino Pott-Leendertz (1869-1965) and the Transvaal
Museum Herbarium. Bothalia 9: 1-3.
- 1966d. Omithogalum xanthochlorum. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 37: t. 1463.
- 1966e. Omithogalum secundum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37:
t. 1464.
- 1966f. Coleottype natalensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 37: t.
1465.
- 1967a. Two new species of Bulbine (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9: 342-344.
- 1967b. A new combination in Trachyandra (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9:
344.
- 1967c. A new combination in Omithogalum (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9:
344.
- 1967d. The identity of Bulbinella carnosa (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9:
345.
- 1967e. The identity of Fritillaria nana (Liliaceae). Bothalia 9: 345.
- 1967f. Dietes butcheriana. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t. 1487.
- 1967g. Dietes flavida. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t. 1488.
- 1967h. Gasteria transvaalensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t.
1501.
- 1967i. Haworthia koelmaniorum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38:
t. 1502.
- 1967j. Lindernia intrepidus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t.
1503.
- 1 967k. Nivenia stokoei. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t. 1 504.
- 1968a. Dietes vegeta. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t. 1524.
- 1968b. Dietes bicolor. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t. 1525.
- 1968c. Moraea graminicola. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t.
1526.
- 1969a. Haworthia koelmaniorum: a correction (Liliaceae). Bothalia
10: 74.
- 1969b. Nymphaea lotus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t. 1541.
- 1969c. Zamioculcas zamiifolia. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t.
1562.
- 1970a. Droseraceae, Roridulaceae, Podostemaceae, Hydrostachyaceae.
Flora of southern Africa 13: 187-213.
- 1970b. Moraea huttonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t. 1581.
- 1970c. Moraea galpinii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t. 1582.
- 1970d. Gladiolus lewisiae. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t.
1596.
- 1970e. Moraea neglecta. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t. 1597.
- 1 970f. Aponogeton distachyos. The Flowering Plants of Africa 4 1 : t.
1618.
- 1970g. Omithogalum saundersiae. The Flowering Plants of Africa
41: t. 1619.
- 1971a. Two new Omithogalum species from South-West Africa.
Bothalia 10: 355-358.
- 1971b. Dilatris viscosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 41: t. 1621.
- 1971c. x Ruttyruspolia ‘Phyllis van Heerden’. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 41: t. 1622.
- 1972a. Clivia gardenii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42: t. 1641.
- 1972b. Stylochiton natalense. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42: t.
1648.
- 1972c. Gethyllis lanuginosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42: t.
1649. '
- 1972d. Gethyllis villosa. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42: t. 1650.
- 1972e. Gladiolus densiflorus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 42: t.
1651.
- 1973a. A note on Laurembergia repens (Halorrhagidaceae). Bothalia
11: 116. 117.
- 1973b. Aloe. Chamaealoe, Haworthia. Astroloba. Poellnitzia and
Chortolirion (Liliaceae). Bothalia 11: 119.
- 1973c. Caesia and Nanolirion (Liliaceae). Bothalia 11: 122, 123.
- 1974a. New taxa in the Tumeraceae. Bothalia 1 1: 288-290.
- 1974b. Gladiolus cardinalis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 43: t.
1682.
- 1974c. Gladiolus brevifolius. The Flowering Plants of Africa 43: t.
1683.
- 1974d. Gladiolus maculatus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 43: t.
1684.
- 1976a. Elatinaceae, Frankeniaceae. Tamaricaceae. Flora of southern
Africa 22: 23-39.
- 1976b. Violaceae. Flora of southern Africa 22: 42-52.
- 1976c. Tumeraceae. Flora of southern Africa 22: 93-103.
- 1976c. Cactaceae. Flora of southern Africa 22: 144—156.
- 1976d. Liliaceae [and other families, unspecified]. In R.A. Dyer, The
genera of southern African flowering plants, vol. 2. Department
of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
- 1976e. A new species of Omithogalum (Liliaceae) from the Natal
Drakensberg. Bothalia 12: 61.
- 1976f. A new combination in Bulbine (Liliaceae). Bothalia 12: 62.
- 1976g. Gasteria rawlinsonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 43: t.
1701.
- 1977a. Babiana pygmaea. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44: t. 1731.
- 1977b. Brunsvigia marginata. The Flowering plants of Africa 44: t.
1740.
- 1977c. A new species of Gonatopus from southern Africa (Araceae).
Bothalia 12: 251-253.
- 1978a. Omithogalum: a revision of the southern African species.
Bothalia 12: 323-376.
- 1978b. A new combination in Tricliceras (Tumeraceae). Bothalia 12:
453.
- 1978c. Bobartia robusta. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44: t. 1742.
- 1978d. Gladiolus atropurpureus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 44:
t. 1760.
- 1979a. Aloe macleayi. The Flowering Plants of Africa 45: t. 1789.
130
Bothalia 32,1 (2002)
- 1979b. A new species of Gladiolus from the Transvaal (Iridaceae).
Bothalia 12: 636.
- 1980a. The genus Sypharissa (Liliaceae). Bothalia 13: 111-114.
- 1980b. A new combination in GethyUis (Amaryllidaceae). Bothalia
13: 136.
- 1980c. Anew subtribe in Liliaceae. Bothalia 13: 137.
- 1980d. A new subgenus Rhadamanthopsis and two new species of
Rhadamanthus (Liliaceae). Bothalia 13: 137-139.
- 1980e. The status of Urginea epigaea (Liliaceae). Bothalia 13: 139.
- 1980f. A new combination in Thuranthos (Liliaceae). Bothalia 13:
139.
- 1980g. Aloe decurva. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t. 1802.
- 1980h. HSe mar thus canaliculatus. The Flowering Plants of Africa
46: t. 1803.
- 1980i. Hesperantha longimllis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t.
1810.
- 1981a. A new species of Strumaria (Amaryllidaceae). Bothalia 13:
435.
- 1981b. Two new species of Commelina (Commelinaceae). Bothalia
13:436, 437.
-1981c. A new combination in Commelina (Commelinaceae).
Bothalia 13: 437.
- 198 Id. Two new species of Cyanotis (Commelinaceae). Bothalia 13:
437-439.
- 1 98 1 e. A new combination in Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae). Bothalia
13: 450.
- 198 If. A new species of Crocosmia (Iridaceae). Bothalia 13: 450,
451.
1 98 1 g. A new subspecies of Gladiolus microcarpus (Iridaceae).
Bothalia 13: 451.
- 198 lh. A re-appraisial of Urginea altissima (Liliaceae). Bothalia 13:
452, 453.
- 1982a. A new species of Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Bothalia 14: 78.
- 1982b. Rhadamanthopsis changed to Drimioides (Liliaceae).
Bothalia 14: 78.
- 1983a. Protasparagus Oberm., nom. nov.: new combinations
(Asparagaceae). South African Journal of Botany 2: 243, 244.
- 1983b. Commelina bella. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47: t. 1876.
- 1984. Revision of the genus Myrsiphyllum Willd. (Liliaceae).
Bothalia 15: 77-88.
- 1985a. The genus Protasparagus (Asparagaceae) in southern Africa.
Bothalia 15: 548, 549.
- 1985b. Eriocaulaceae. Flora of southern Africa 4,2: 9-21.
-1985c. Pontederiaceae, Juncaceae. Flora of southern Africa 4,2:
61-91.
- 1992a. Sansevieria. Flora of southern Africa 5,3: 5-9.
- 1992b. Luzuriagaceae, Smilacaceae. Flora of southern Africa 5,3:
83-86.
OBERMEYER. A. A. & BOGNER, J. 1979. Gonatopus rhizomatosus.
The Flowering Plants of Africa 45: t. 1782.
OBERMEYER, A.A^& DU TOIT, P.C.V. 1976. Ochnaceae. Flora of
southern Arnica 22: 1-13.
OBERMEYER, A. A. & FADEN, R.B. 1985. Commelinaceae. Flora of
southern Africa 4,2: 23-60.
OBERMEYER, A. A. & IMMELMAN, K.L. 1992. Asparagaceae.
Flora of southern Africa 5,3: 1 1-82.-
OBERMEYER, A. A. & NICHOLAS, A. 1 984. Drosera burkeana. The
Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1886.
OBERMEYER, A. A. SCHWEICKERDT, H.G. & VERDOORN, I.C.
1937. An enumeration of plants collected in the northern
Transvaal. Bothalia 3: 223-258.
OBERMEYER, A. A. & STREY. R.G. 1969. A new species of Raphia
from northern Zululand and Mozambique (Arecaceae). Botha-
lia 10: 29-37.
H.F. GLEN *
* National Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 ,
0001 Pretoria.
Bothalia 32.1: 131 (2002)
Book Review
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IN THE HORN OF AFRICA
REGION— PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL
SYMPOSIUM ON THE FLORA OF ETHIOPIA AND ERITREA AT
THE CARLBERG ACADEMY. COPENHAGEN. AUGUST 25-27,
1999. edited by IB FRIIS & OLOF RYDING. 2001 . The Royal Danish
Academy of Sciences and Letters , Copenhagen, in KDVS Biologiske
Skrifter 54. Available from C.A. Reitzel A/S. Norregade 20, DK-1165
Copenhagen K. Denmark. Soft cover ISSN 0366-3612. ISBN 87-7876-
246-4. price 500 DKK/US$ 60 (excluding P+P).
When I received the request to review this publication, I must admit
1 dreaded the idea. Let me explain. First, it is a rather hefty publication
— intimidating even enthusiasts like myself. Secondly, proceedings are
generally bland, and as one of the editors of the publication wrote in his
correspondence to the editor of Bothalia ‘proceedings are difficult to
review'. Thirdly, even though once upon a time I was a taxonomist and
actually did enjoy my research work. I have not practised as a
researcher for six years. Instead, the last six years have seen me
involved in and shaping global and national policy issues. 1 therefore
did not think this would interest me. I will not bore you with the details
of how I overcame my dread; the most important thing is that you are
now reading this review!
Let me first make some general comments. After spending a couple
of days going through the 439-page publication. I have to say some-
thing to all those who participated in the Ethiopian Flora Project. Well
done!
One of the aspects I liked about this publication was that even
though I had little background about the project and certainly did not
read the proceedings of the first and the second symposia, the intro-
ductory section of the publication put me in the picture and gave con-
text to the rest of the papers in the publication. The introductory section
is quite interesting to read — it touches on the history of the project
which was launched in 1980. but the idea dates back to 1967. It also
gives the reader an insight into the political situation and conflict
between Ethiopia and Eritrea, which certainly had an impact on the pro-
ject.
I was quite impressed by the collaborative effort between the 35
European, Ethiopian, Arabian and American scientists as evidenced by
authors of the 26 papers presented. The resulting capacity building
from the project is commendable: several Ethiopian scientists have
been trained as part of the project, the capacity of the National
Herbarium in Addis Ababa has been enlarged, the number of herbarium
specimens increased from 16 000 to 70 000! All these details are con-
tained in the introductory part of the publication.
The remainder of the publication contains several scientific papers
covering a range of disciplines. I actually took time to read some of the
papers dealing with taxonomy and systematics. I think the research
findings presented in these papers make a significant contribution to the
knowledge and documentation of Africa’s floral diversity. Then there
are papers on the history of scientific study of Ethiopian and Eritrean
flora as well as an account of some of the early explorations in that part
of the world. The publication also contains papers describing the diver-
sity, endemism, patterns of distribution of flora of not just Ethiopia and
Eritrea, but also of northeast tropical Africa (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Djibouti.
Somalia, Kenya). As part of this set of papers, there is an account of
avian endemism in northeastern tropical Africa and which is co-
authored by a South African.
I did anticipate that proceedings would address ethnobotany. I have
gathered from global meetings attended, that Ethiopia attaches impor-
tance to and strongly promotes conservation and sustainable use of its
genetic resources, particularly in the context of agriculture. The three
papers on ethnobotany were interesting to read. The links between
Ethiopia’s floral diversity and agriculture, forestry and cultural heritage
are well illustrated in these papers. The final part of the publication
deals with vegetation. There are five papers on this topic, including a
paper on the review of the existing vegetation map of Ethiopia and
Eritrea which points out the need for a new map.
Most of the papers presented in the publication contain either illus-
trations, drawings, diagrams, maps and photographs. I think the down-
point of the publication is that most of these are in black-and-white,
with only a few colour photographs.
As you might have noted, the publication should be of interest to
mainly the research fraternity. South African botanists, particularly
those who collaborate across the African region should find it a valu-
able resource.
As I went through it I could not help but think of how relevant this
project is to Article 7a of the Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD) and Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI). The GTI African
Regional Workshop held at the Kirstenbosch National Botanical
Gardens from 27th February to 1st March 2001, adopted the
Kirstenbosch Declaration which recommended, among others of rele-
vance to the work presented in this publication that: 'Parties support
existing African national and regional networks that promote imple-
mentation of the GTI. for example SABONET. AETFAT. BOZONET,
and WAFRINET. SAFRINET. and EAFRINET of BioNET-INTERNA-
TIONAL’ ( Klopper et al. 2001). The work presented in this publication
lays a solid foundation for. and makes good contribution towards the
implementation of the GTI and other similar initiatives.
REFERENCES
KLOPPER. R.R.. SMITH. G.F. & CHIKUNI, A.C. (eds). 2001. The
Global Taxonomy Initiative: documenting the biodiversity of
Africa/L’Initiative Taxonomique Mondiale: documenter la bio-
diversite en Afrique. Proceedings of a Workshop held at the
Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town, South
Africa, 27 February — 1 March 2001. Strelitzia 12. National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
KHUNGEKA NJOBE*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria, 0001.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R1 70,00 Other countries US$55.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R340,00 Other countries US$110.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
Contents to vols 1-20
by H.F. Glen, B.A. Momberg & E. Potgieter (1991)
A brief history of Bothalia; a list of all papers published; a list of all authors, co-authors, keywords and titles; and tables with
publication dates, major subjects covered and some information on authors.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$7.00
Contents to vols 21-25
by B.A. Momberg & J.M. Mulvenna (1996)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and titles, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$7.00
Contents to vols 26-30
by B.A. Momberg (2000)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and titles, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R18.00 / Other countries US$8.00
Set of all available issues
up to and including: Volume 31; Contents to Vols 1-20; 21-25; and 26-30; all existing indices.
Price: SADC countries, R500.00 / Other countries, US$200.00
1 lie history of the
Botanical Research Institute
by Denise Fourie
a reprint of this article in Bothalia 28,2 with an attractive cover
Price: SADC countries, R30.00 / Other countries, US$10.00
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 • Fax. (012) 804-3211 • email: bookshop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za
BOTHALIA
Volume 32,1
May 2002
CONTENTS
1. Clivia mirabilis (Amaryllidaceae: Haemantheae) a new species from Northern Cape, South Africa. J.P.
ROURKE 1
2. The genus Buglossoides (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa. E. RETIEF and A. E. VAN WYK .' 9
3. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. Riccardia compacta.
S.M. PEROLD 15
4. Revision of the Tarchonanthus camphoratus complex (Asteraceae-Tarchonantheae) in southern Africa.
P.P.J. HERMAN 21
5. Taxonomy of the Passerinci filiformis L. complex (Thymelaeaceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E.
VAN WYK 29
6. The genus Erica (Ericaceae) in southern Africa: taxonomic notes 1. E.G.H. OLIVER and I. M. OLIVER 37
7. Notes on African plants:
Apocynaceae. A new species of Brachystelma from Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P. DOLD .... 71
Campanulaceae. A new species of Merciera from Western Cape, South Africa. C.N. CUPIDO . . 74
Eriospermaceae. Validation of two sectional names in Eriospermum. J. THIEDE 76
Hyacinthaceae. A new combination in Daubenya. J.C. MANNING and A.M. VAN DER MERWE 63
Lamiaceae. New combinations in the genus Rotheca in southern Africa. P.P.J. HERMAN and E.
RETIEF. 81
Marsileaceae-Pteropsida. First report of the genus Pilularia from continental Africa. J.P. ROUX 82
Thymelaeaceae. Systematics of Passerinci truncata and a new subspecies monticola. C.L. BRE-
DENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 65
Thymelaeaceae. A new species of Passerinci from Western Cape, South Africa. C.L. BREDEN-
KAMP and A.E. VAN WYK 76
Thymelaeaceae. A new species of Gnidia from the Knersvlakte, Western Cape, South Africa.
J.B.P. BEYERS 79
8. The taxonomic significance of trichome type and distribution in Melolobium (Fabaceae). A. MOTEE-
TEE, B-E. VAN WYK and P.M. TILNEY 85
9. Pollen morphology and biometry of the genus Androcymbium (Colchicaceae) in southern Africa: taxono-
mic and biogeographic considerations. N. MEMBRIVES, J. MARTIN, J. CAUJAPE-CASTELLS
and J. PEDROLA-MONFORT 91
10. Biogeography of Oxalis (Oxalidaceae) in South Africa: a preliminary study. K.C. OBERLANDER, L.L.
DREYER and K.J. ESLER 97
11. A checklist of the plants of Mahwaqa Mountain, KwaZulu-Natal. E.B. METER, T.J. EDWARDS, M.A.
RENNIE and J.E. GRANGER 101
12. Preliminary DNA fingerprinting of the turf gras$ Cynodon dactylon (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). R.
ROODT, J.J. SPIES and T.H. BURGER 117
13. Miscellaneous notes:
Poaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 16. Polyploidy in the genus Ehrharta. J.J. SPIES,
M.M. VAN DYK and S.M.C. VAN WYK 123
14. Obituary: Anna Amelia Obermeyer-Mauve (1907-2001). H.F. GLEN 127
15. Book review 131
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Abstracts/RRM • CABS • CABACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Current Contents. Scisearish, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: reviews and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 0001 , South Africa. Tel. (012) 804-3200. Fax (012)
804-321 I. email: bookshop@nbiprc.nbi.ac.za website: www.nbi.ac.ztt/pubs. Typesetting and page layout: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction: 4 Images,
P.O. Box 34059. 0010 Glenstantia. Pretoria. Printing: Afriscot Printers. P.O. Box 75353, Lynnwood Ridge, 0040 Pretoria. Tel (012) 349-2800/1. Fax
(012) 349-2802.