Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 33.1
May 2003
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001, Republic of
South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of
the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is
devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Three booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20, (b) to Vols 21-25 and (c) to Vols 26-30, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OE THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OE SOUTH AERICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many botanical artists have contributed to
the series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian Condy, Betty Connell, Stella
Gower, Rosemary Holcroft, Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire Linder-
Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased to receive living plants of general interest
or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1^9 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (ESA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia
and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the informa-
tion is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidium, 1983, by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium), 1989, by J.M.
& H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. &
H.M. Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 317, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stemming the Sixth Extinction, 1999,
by J.M. Anderson (ed.)
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 33,1
Scientific Editor: G. Germishuizen
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
.Botanical
INSTITUTE
NASIONALE BOTANif^S
INISTITUUT ~
Private Bac- x in-' po-y.^n , ,
2003 -G8- 1 3 ' C
2 Cussonia Avenue. Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XIOl, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
May 2003
Centenary Year
IN CELEBRATION
OF
THE CENTENARY OF THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM (PRE)* IN 2003 AND
ITS IMMEASURABLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND FURTHER AFIELD
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J.A, Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Acknowledgements to referees
Archer, Mrs C. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Baijnath, Prof. H. University of Durban-Westville, Durban, RSA.
Bohs, Dr L. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Brown, Dr E. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia.
Brummitt, Dr R.K. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Burgoyne, Ms P. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Craven, Ms P. P.O.Box 399, Omaruru, Namibia.
Crouch, Dr N.R. National Botanical Institute, Durban, RSA.
Edwards, Dr T.J. University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, RSA.
Hammer, S. Sphaeroid Institute, 2077 Monte Vista Drive, Vista, USA.
Hilliard, Dr O.M. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Ihlenfeldt, Prof. H.D. Ostseestr. 40, D-24369 Waabs, Germany.
Kativu, Dr S. University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Leistner, Dr O.A. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Manning, Dr J.C. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Nicholas, Dr A. University of Durban-Westville, Durban, RSA.
Nordenstam, Prof. R.B. Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oliver, Dr E.G.H. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Paterson-Jones, Dr D. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Baton, Dr A. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Relief, Ms E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Smith, Dr G.E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Stedje, Prof. B. University of Oslo, Norway.
Timberlake, Dr J.R. Biodiversity Eoundation for Africa, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Van Wyk, Prof. A.E. University of Pretoria, RSA.
Victor, Ms J.E. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Werger, Prof. M.J.A. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
.See Bothalia 28: 271-297 (1998).
CONTENTS
Volume 33,1
1. The genus Solanum (Solanaceae) in southern Africa: subgenus Leptostemomim, the introduced sections
Acanthophora and Ton’a. W.G. WELMAN 1
2. Studies in the genus Machairophyllwn (Mesembryanthemaceae), with notes on some related genera.
H. KURZWEIL and P. CHESSELET 19
3. A new serotinous species of Cliffortia L. (Rosaceae) from Northern Cape, South Africa and section
emended. A. C. EELLINGHAM 41
4. A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 3. The reinstatement of L. ensifolia, L. gol-
pinii and L. sandersonii. T.J. EDWARDS and S. VENTER 49
5. An annotated checklist of the pteridophyte flora of Swaziland. J.P. ROUX 53
6. Taxonomy of the genus (Thymelaeaceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A. E. VAN WYK .... 59
7. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 5. Riccanlia amazonica.
S.M. PEROLD 99
8. Notes on African plants:
Apocynaceae. A new subspecies of Brachystelma from Eastern Cape, South Africa(Asclepia-
doideae-Ceropegieae). A.P DOLD and PV BRUYNS 105
Asteraceae. A new species of Philyropliylliim (Gnaphalieae) from Namibia. PPJ. HERMAN .... 118
Hyacinthaceae. A new species and new combinations in Drimia (Urgineoideae). J.C. MANNING
and P. GOLDBLATT 109
Hyacinthaceae. A new species of Ornithogaliim from Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P. DOLD
and S. A. HAMMER 112
Hyacinthaceae and Crassulaceae. Two new cremnophilous taxa from semi-arid regions in South
Africa. E.J. VAN JAARSVELD and A.E. VAN WYK 115
Lamiaceae. Tetradenia kaokoensis, a new species from Kaokoland, Namibia. E.J. VAN JAARS-
VELD and A.E. VAN WYK 107
Lamiaceae. The correct name for Salvia thermara. E.J. VAN JAARSVELD 112
9. A comparison of Mopaneveld vegetation in South Africa. Namibia and Zimbabwe. F. SIEBERT, G.J. BRE-
DENKAMP and S.J. SIEBERT 121
10. Miscellaneous notes:
Hyacinthaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 19. New chromosome counts for three
taxa. P.D. LEBATHA, J.J. SPIES and M.H. BUYS 135
11. Book reviews 139
New name, species, subspecies and combinations in Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Albuca therniarum Van Jaarsv., sp. nov., 116
Brachystelma franksiae N.E.Br. subsp. grandiflorum A.PDold & Bniyns, subsp. nov., 105
Cliffortia dichotoma Fellingham, sp. nov., 41
Crassula foveata Van Jaarsv., sp. nov., 116
Drimia barkerae Oberni. ex J.C. Manning <& Goldblatt, sp. nov., 109
Drimia ciliata (Lf.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb, nov.. Ill
Drimia hesperantha J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, nom. nov.. Ill
Drimia kniphofloides {Baker) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb, nov., Ill
Drimia nana (Snijinan) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb, nov.. Ill
Drimia saniensis (Hilliard & B.L.Burtt) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb, nov.. Ill
Ledebouria ensifolia (Eckl.) S. Venter & T.J. Edwards, comb, nov., 49
Ledebouria galpinii (Baker) S.Venter & T.J. Edwards, comb, nov., 50
Ledebouria sandersonii (Baker) S.Venter & T.J. Edwards, comb, nov., 50
Ornithogalum perdurans A.P.DoW & S. A. Hammer, sp. nov., 112
Passerina esterhuyseniae Bredenkamp & A.E.van Wyk, sp. nov., 75
Philyrophyllum brandbergense P.P.J. Herman, sp. nov., 118
Tetradenia kaokoensis Van Jaarsv. & A.E.van Wyk, sp. nov., 107
iv
Bothalia 33.1: 1-18 (2003)
The genus Solanum (Solanaceae) in southern Africa: subgenus
Leptostemonum, the introduced sections Acanthophora and Torva
W.G. WELMAN*
Keywords: Acanthophora Dunal, ethnobotany, Leptostemonum (Dunal) Bitter, morphology, Solanaceae, Solanum L., southern Africa, taxonomy,
Ton'a Nees
ABSTRACT
In the genus Solanum L. (Solanaceae), subgenus Leptostemonum (Dunal I Bitter, section Acanthophora Dunal has four
representatives in the Flora of southern Africa region (South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia, Botswana), namely S.
aculeatissimum Jacq., S. Allioni. S. mammosum L. (cultivated only) and S. viarum Dunal. Section Tona Nees
has two representatives in southern Africa, namely S. chrysotrichum Schltdl. (S. hispidum auctt. non Pers.) and S. tonmni
Sw.; both are naturalized weeds. Solanum capsicoides, S. viarum and S. ton'um have not been listed before for southern
Africa. All are introduced species native to the New World. Descriptions, discussions, illustrations and distribution maps of
the naturalized species are presented, as well as keys to the species of both sections.
CONTENTS
Abstract 1
Introduction 1
Descriptions and discussions 1
Section Acanthophora Dunal 1
Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq 3
S. capsicoides Allioni 6
S. mammosum L 8
S. viarum Dunal 10
Section Torx’a Nees 11
Solanum chrysotrichum Schltdl 12
S. tonnim Sw 13
Specimens examined 15
Acknowledgements 16
References 16
INTRODUCTION
In the genus Solanum L., the prickly subgenus Lepto-
stemonum (Dunal) Bitter is represented by eight sections
in southern Africa. Two sections contain only indigenous
taxa, one section contains mainly indigenous taxa, and
the remaining sections have only introduced species.
Section Acanthophora Dunal is represented by four
species in southern Africa. All are originally from the
Americas, namely the rather common and widespread
weed S. aculeatissimum, the relatively rare weed S. cap-
sicoides, the cultivated ornamental S. mammosum, and S.
viarum which is becoming a fairly common weed in
KwaZulu-Natal and neighbouring areas. S. capsicoides
and S. viarum have not been listed before for southern
Africa (Welman 1993). Section Totra Nees is represent-
ed by two species in southern Africa; both are originally
from the Americas. S. chrysotrichum is so far naturalized
only in Eastern Cape, while 5. tonnun is confined to a
fairly small area north of Durban, KwaZulu-Natal.
* National Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl,
0001 Pretoria.
E-mail: wgw(s>nbipre.nbi.ac.za
MS. received: 2001-06-28.
Detailed descriptions and discussions are given for both
sections and all six species, together with keys, illustra-
tions and distribution maps. S. mammosum, being culti-
vated only, has no distribution map.
DESCRIPTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS
Section Acanthophora Dunal, Histoire naturelle,
medicale et economique des Solanum: 131, 218 (1813).
Lectotype species: S. mammosum L. (D’Arcy 1972).
Section Aculeata G.Don subsection Acanthophora
(Dunal) G.Don: 434 (1838).
Psilocarpa, grad, ambig., Dunal: 216 ( 1852).
Section Simplicipilum Bitter: 147 (1923). Lectotype
species: S. aculeatissimum Jacq. (Seithe 1962).
Description (based on Nee 1991)
Small shrubs, 0. 3-3.0 m tall, sprawling or more often
erect and few-branched, annuals or short-lived perenni-
als, heavily armed with straight acicular (needle-shaped)
prickles, in some species stems with additional robust
recurved prickles from enlarged compressed bases.
Stems usually glandular-puberulent, often also eglandu-
lar-pilose with few-celled, simple hairs. Leaves petiolate,
alternate or usually geminate, with one about twice the
size of the other; blades usually ovate to orbicular and
with 2-4 pairs of lobes, or repand, coarsely and irregu-
larly toothed, membranous, spiny along main veins
above and below, usually glandular-puberulent above
and usually also eglandular-pilose with simple few-
celled hairs, these sometimes with vestigial rays at base,
below with simple hairs and sessile few-rayed stellate
hairs (these lacking in S. capsicoides). Inflorescences lat-
eral, simple or few-branched, sessile or shortly peduncu-
late, remote from leaves, axis often spiny; flowers few to
many, fewer than half fertile, often only lowest fertile in
large-fruited species. Calyx seldom much accrescent;
lobes triangular to linear. Corolla white, yellowish, green-
2
Bothalia33,l (2003)
ish or blue-puiple, glandular and pilose on outside, stel-
late, without interstitial pleating. Ovary glabrous or
minutely stipitate-glandular, puberulent in few species
with simple hairs that drop off early. Fruit usually glo-
bose, small to large, strongly dark green and pale green
marbled when young, yellowish, orange or reddish at
maturity, glabrous at maturity, exocarp ± tough, meso-
carp juicy, in some species becoming dry at full maturi-
ty, placentae simply columnar, divided or variously
intruded, the fruit becoming effectively or completely
unilocular at maturity. Seeds numerous, subreniform to
orbicular, seed coat closely investing endosperm or
extending around periphery of seed into a flattened wing.
Distribution and ecology
According to Whalen (1984), section Acanthophora
occurs throughout the American tropics except in
Amazonian Brazil; it is most diverse in the northern
Andes and in southeastern Brazil. About 20 species grow
in open savanna and disturbed sites. Several species are
established in the Old World tropics.
Nee (1979) noted that this section, in common with
almost all groups of Solanum, has great weedy tenden-
cies; the species are found in areas of high light intensi-
ties and also where the natural vegetation has been dis-
turbed. Under natural circumstances, landslides, eroded
stream banks and forest openings provide suitable habi-
tats. Man’s agricultural and industrial practices are still
expanding the ranges of numerous species of Solanum.
The succulent berries of many species are popular with
birds and ensure seed dispersal.
Taxonomy
Dunal (1813) appropriately named this group of
prickly species section Acanthophora (thorn-bearing). In
1923, Bitter referred to the characteristic hairs of this
section in the name Simplicipilum. However, Dunal’s
name for this section must take precedence.
In 1972, D’Arcy elevated subsection Lasiocarpum
Dunal of section Acanthophora to section Lasiocarpum
(Dunal) D’Arcy, with S. lasiocarpum Dunal as type
species. Section Acanthophora can be distinguished
from section Lasiocarpum by the lack of stellate hairs on
the ovaries, the more general coverage with multi-celled
simple hairs and the less substantial habit (Jaeger 1985).
Section Lasiocarpum is indigenous to South America
and no representatives have so far been recorded from
southern Africa, though a few species are naturalized
and/or cultivated in East Africa; see Jaeger (1985).
Whalen (1984) placed S. aculeatissimum, S. capsicoi-
des, S. mammosum and S. viarum in his 5. mammosum
Group.
Microscope studies
Section Acanthophora has distinctive simple hairs
that are long, multicelled, uni,seriate, shiny and translu-
cent. These simple hairs are identical with the central ray
of the stellate hairs on the same plant; the latter often
only present on juvenile plants or leaves. During evolu-
tion the basal side rays of the stellate hairs have appar-
ently disappeared. Single-celled simple hairs, often
gland-tipped, may also occur on the upper surface of the
leaf as well as elsewhere on the plant (Nee 1979).
Diagnostic characters
According to Whalen (1984), the S. mammosum Group
of species is distinguished by an essentially herbaceous
habit, difoliate-geminate sympodia, vestiture of predom-
inantly simple hairs, variously lobed or dentate, prickly
leaves, lateral, often simple inflorescences, stelliform
corollas and dryish, glabrous berries.
Nee (1979) stated that section Acanthophora, as a
member of the prickly subgenus Leptostemonum (Dunal)
Bitter, deserves its name; all the species are heavily
armed with sharp, slender prickles and some species
have stouter, broad-based prickles as well. He defined
the section by the combination of the upper leaf surface
bearing only simple hairs, glabrous fruit and the non- to
only slightly accrescent calyx.
This section can be divided into two subsections
based on the seed morphology (Nee 1979). One subsec-
tion, with seeds that do not differ much from those of
almost all other Solanum species, includes S. aculeatissi-
mum, S. mammosum and S. viarum. The other subsection
is characterized by seeds surrounded by a broad, flat-
tened margin or wing, a character unique in Solanum.
This subsection is probably monophyletic and includes
S. capsicoides. The evolutionary significance of the
winged seed is not clear; it could aid in wind or water
dispersal.
Sex forms and branching
Whalen & Costich (1986) described section Acan-
thophora as weakly to strongly andromonoecious; having
both perfect and male flowers, but no female flowers.
Species of this section have some short-styled flowers,
and are self-compatible. The fruits are small to large; it
was found that andromonoecy in section Acanthophora
is most strongly developed in large-fruited species.
Child (1979) and Child & Lester (1991) studied the
branching patterns in the Solanaceae. All sections of the
subgenus Leptostemonum have 2- or 3-foliate sympodial
units often with the subtending leaf paired with the small-
er first leaf of the daughter shoot (anisophyllous geminate
sympodia). Section Acanthophora has mostly simple
few-flowered inflorescences with only the basalmost
flower and/or the few proximal flowers of the subsidiary
inflorescence hermaphrodite; the distal flowers are usual-
ly smaller, brachystylous or short-styled (andromonoe-
cious; Symon 1979) and are often inserted with a spatial
gap from the hermaphrodite flowers. Species with prick-
ly calyces in the hermaphrodite flowers usually have
unarmed, functionally male, brachystylous flowers.
Note
Nee (1991) noted that this section contains a number
of promising candidates for screening for alkaloids.
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
3
Key to species of section Acanthophora in southern
Africa (from Jaeger 1985)
la Seeds 4-6 mm diam., prominently winged; branches and
leaves almost glabrous to sparsely hairy; ripe fruit Ver-
million (sometimes cultivated) S. capsicoides
lb Seeds 2-5 mm diam., not winged; branches and lower leaf
surface hairy; ripe fruit yellow:
2a Stems with acicular prickles only; branches with scattered
simple hairs S. acideatissimiim
2b Stems prickly with both compressed and recurved and
long, straight acicular prickles; branches hirsute with
dense, simple hairs:
3a Hairs on stem of variable lengths, 2^ mm long; calyx
not prickly; corolla violet; fruit globose, usually
with an apical nipple and several basal protuber-
ances; seeds 5 mm diam. (cultivated only)
S. mammosum
3b Hairs on stern of uniform lengths, up to 5 mm long; calyx
prickly; corolla white; fruit globose; seeds ± 2 mm
diam S. viarum
1 . Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq., Collectanea aus-
triaca ad botanicum 1: 100 (1787a); Jacq.: t. 41 (1787b);
Bitter: 148 (1923); Heine; 334 ( 1963); Pearse: 173(1978);
Gbile: 115 (1979); Jaeger: 478 (1985); Bukenya & Hall: 84
(1988); Nee: 265 (1991); Bukenya & Carasco: 51 (1995);
Relief & P.P.J. Herman: 622 (1997); Shaw: 234, 239
(2000). Type: cultivated plant at Vienna, ‘Patria in zona tor-
rida est’, Jacquin s.n. (W).
S. reflexion Schrank: t. 81 (1822). Type: cultivated plant in Hortus
Monacensis (Munich), von Schrank s.n. (M).
S. khasianum C.B. Clarke: 234 (1883). Type: India, Khasia Mts.
Nunklow. J. D. Hooker & TThomson 14 (CAL).
S. cavaleriei Leveille & Vaniot: 207 (1908). Type: from China.
J.Cavalerie 2722 (E).
Annual, sparsely branched herb or undershrub up to
1 .5 m high, pubescence highly variable, dense to sparse
(plant rarely nearly glabrous). Stef7is tinged purple and
green, rarely densely pubescent, with simple, uniseriate,
multicellular hairs of unequal lengths, up to 4 mm long,
heavily armed with many slender, acicular, straight,
spreading or slightly reflexed prickles up to 12 mm long
with base 0.5 mm broad. Leaves ovate, up to 160 x 180
mm, base truncate or slightly cordate, lobation variable,
usually doubly or dentately lobed to 'A width of leaf,
with 3 or 4 pairs of major acute, triangular lobes, middle
lobe up to 55 mm long, dark green when fresh, usually
drying dull dark green, with simple pilose hairs on both
surfaces of leaves, rarely with stellate hairs on underside,
prickles on midrib and petiole slender, ± 15 mm long,
base ± 2 mm broad, prickles on primary lateral veins
slender, ± 7 mm long, purple near base, upper part yel-
low, the base 0.8 mm broad; petiole 4-80 mm long.
Inflorescences simple, 3-5(6)-flowered; peduncles up to
0.5 mm long; pedicels ± 10 mm long. Calyx: lobes often
unequal, elongating immediately after anthesis and con-
cealing immature fruits with subcaudate lobe tips,
pubescent, becoming prickly in fruit. Corolla 10-15 x
25-30 mm, stellate, white, greenish or yellow-green,
sometimes with a purple tint, rarely with purplish hairs.
Stamens: filaments green to yellow; anthers yellow. Style
white; pistil pale green. Fruit nodding, globose, 15-30
mm diam., smooth, pale green with medium green
stripes or white with green reticulation when young,
dirty yellow or brownish when ripe. Seeds 2-4 mm
diam., brownish, moderately flattened, seed coat closely
investing endosperm, with margin sometimes thickened
but not wing-like. Figure 1 .
Distribution
Whalen (1984) gave the distribution of this species as
southea.stem Brazil (natural) and Central Africa (natural-
ized). Jaeger (1985) stated: The wide distribution of this
species in Africa, and its scarcity or even absence from the
New World, together suggest that S. aculeatissimum is
native to Africa. This gives section Acanthophora an inex-
plicably disjunct distribution. However, S. aculeatissimum
grows as a weed of secondary vegetation, indicating that it
is more likely to be an introduction to Africa; and when it
is considered that trade routes between the New World and
Africa have been established for over 400 years (Roe
1979), an early introduction of this species would allow
time for its subsequent dispersal. Its hideously spiny habit
must deter grazing and contribute to its success.’
Jaeger & Hepper ( 1986) confirmed that S. aculeatissi-
mum seems to have been in Africa for a long time, hav-
ing achieved a very wide distribution in the Afromontane
regions in western, eastern and southern Africa. Nee
(1991) reported that S. aculeatissimum occurs naturally
mainly from Rio Grande do Sul, Parana and Santa
Catarina states in Brazil. He also reported that this
species has long been grown in European botanical gar-
dens where it is very uniform and may represent a single
introduction from South African populations, which they
strongly resemble.
Because of confusion with S. capsicoides and other
heavily armed species of Solanum, distribution records
of S. aculeatissimum in the literature are often not reli-
able. In southern Africa, this species is fairly common in
Limpopo [Northern Province], Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-
Natal, Eastern Cape and rare in the Free State, Lesotho
and Western Cape, with one isolated record in the North-
West almost on the border with Gauteng (Figure 2). It is
also sometimes cultivated as a curiosity in these areas,
e.g. in botanical gardens; Forbes NH34644 (NH) was
grown at the Botanical Station, Durban in 1944.
Ecology
Nee (1991) recorded that S. aculeatissimum is a weedy
shrub that grows in disturbed or pastured forest, in grazing
fields and along roadsides, from 400-1 200 m altitude. Tn
sub-Saharan Africa it is found at forest edges and in savan-
nas, mostly in the eastern uplands of the great lakes region,
but scattered through the rain forest and into South Africa,
from 1 000-2 400 m, rarely descending almost to sea
level.’ Gbile ( 1979) described this as a highland species in
Nigeria that grows mostly on rough ground and amongst
rocks. According to Bukenya & Carasco (1995), S. aculea-
tissimum generally grows in forest clearings in Uganda;
according to Bukenya & Hall (1988), it is a rare species in
secondary forest in western Ghana.
In southern Africa, S. aculeatissimum grows in forest
margins and clearings, along forest paths, and among
undergrowth in closed natural forest, but also in Finns and
4
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 1 . — A, Solcmum aculeatissi-
mum, Acocks 10787, fruit
Nienaber 9 (PRE); B, S. tor-
vum, Henderson 737 (PRE).
Artist: G. Condy.
Eucalyptus plantations. It prefers damp, shady places
under shrubs and trees. It is also found along roadsides and
in other disturbed areas, as a weed in gardens, ploughed
fields as well as grassland. Wells et al. (1986) listed S.
aculeatissimurn as a ruderal, silvicultural and pastoral
weed of the temperate and subtropical summer rainfall
areas in southern Africa. It is found on gentle and steep
mountain and hill slopes, in gorges and valleys, but also on
flats; it can grow on moist humus-rich and red-brown
loamy soil and also on well-drained sandy or stony soil. It
is common in mountainous areas and is recorded from
about sea level to ± 2 200 m altitude, with a rainfall of up
to 2 000 mm annually. Acocks (1988) listed S. aculeatissi-
miiin as one of the generally occurring smaller plants of
the forest floor and margin in his Northeastern Mountain
Sourveld which is one of the Inland Tropical Forest Types.
He also listed it as one of the smaller plants of general
occurrence in the Highland .Sourveld which is one of the
Temperate and Transitional Forest and Scrub Types.
Nee (1991 ) stated that in Brazil, its natural distribu-
tion area, flowering is confined from October to
February, similarly in East Africa, but throughout the
year in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In south-
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Solanum acideatisshmim in the FSA
region.
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
5
em Africa it flowers from about November to March and
fruits from about November to April.
Chromosome number and chemistry
Both Fedorov (1969) and Bukenya-Ziraba ( 1996) list-
ed 2n = 24.
Dalziel (1937) reported that the stem contains sola-
nine, an alkaloidal glucoside with physiological action
like saponin, but much less poisonous. Watt & Breyer-
Brandwijk (1962) also reported that S. aculeatissimum
contains solanine. The immature fruit is said to contain
more solanine than the mature. Reports that the plant is
toxic to cattle, horses and even humans are suspect as
they may not be referring to the true 5. aculeatissimum.
Hepper (1978) stated that the steroidal alkaloid solaso-
dine always occurs in the fruits of S. aculeatissimum, but
little is found in the leaves. Roddick (1986) gave figures
for the amounts of solasodine in the leaves and fruit, con-
firming Flepper. Hutchings et al. (1996) reported that
solasodine, solamargine and solasonine have been isolat-
ed from leaves, stems, fruit pericarps and seeds. The
highest concentration of glycoalkaloids was found in
seeds, followed by fruit pericarps, leaves and stems.
Solasonine accounted for about 80% of the total glyco-
alkaloids, whereas solamargine accounted for about
13%, and was not found in stems.
Medicinal and other uses
Mehra (1979) reported that in Malaysia the leaf juice
of S. aculeatissimum is used in a ritual preparation to be
taken at childbirth. In Puerto Rico the sliced fruit of S.
aculeatissimum (or plants known as) is fatal when con-
sumed by cockroaches (Mabberley 1997). In Liberia, the
fluid prepared by boiling the fruits of S. aculeatissimum
is applied in an enema for constipation (Dalziel 1937).
Gbile & Adesina (1988) reported the same for Nigeria. In
West Africa the fruit and the root are used as remedies for
cough and dysmynorrhoea.
Hutchings et al. ( 1996) reported that in Transkei, South
Africa, the ripe fruit is applied to the forehead for
headaches and is used for healing the navels of new-born
babies, and smoke from burning plants is used for
toothache (also in Nepal); root decoctions are taken for
backache and impotence. An infusion of the root is a Zulu
snake-bite remedy (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962). In
Eastern Cape, South Africa, it was noted on the voucher,
Bradley 49 (GRA), that the poisonous fruit is used for skin
infections and the root for flatulence and as a purgative.
Microscope studies
Gbile & Sowunmi (1979) described the pollen of S.
aculeatissimum as subprolate and triangular, polar axis ±
28.0 pm, equatorial diameter ± 22.5 pm, with the sexine
pattern faintly distinct. Nee (1986) investigated the pla-
centation pattern of S. aculeatissimum. The placenta is
H-shaped in cross section, allowing the seeds to fill the
total interior of the large fruit. At maturity the septum is
a very thin film, resulting in a more or less unilocular
berry. The ‘ribs’ running down the sides of the inner peri-
carp at the carpellary midvein strongly suggest traces of
the false septum of S. sisymbriifolium Lam., but does not
indicate a close relationship. Gbile (1986) observed
straight upper epidermal walls in the leaves of S. aculea-
tissimum, which is an uncommon occurrence in a meso-
morphic montane species. Groth (1989) studied the seeds
of S. aculeatissimum-, they are ellipsoid or subdiscoid
with a finely punctate surface. The embryo is circinate
and the cotyledons lanceolate. Ogundipe & Daramola
( 1997) also investigated the leaf epidermis: the anticlinal
cell walls have a wavy pattern, the adaxial cells (± 38.0
X 15.5 pm) have an iiTegular and the abaxial cells (± 33
X 15 pm) an isodiametric cell shape; the abaxial stomata
(± 28.5 X 17.0 pm) are anomocytic.
Taxonomy and diagnostic characters
S. aculeatissimum (seeds not winged) has often been
and still is confused with S. capsicoides (= S. ciliatum
Lam.) (seeds winged) e.g. in Wright (1904); Wright (1906);
Bailey & Bailey (1977); Mabberley ( 1997). D’ Arcy (1972)
chose S. aculeatissimum as the lectotype species of Ar-
matae (subgenus?) and of Macrophyllae (section?) and of
Pannflorae (subsection?), all of Wright (1906).
In southern Africa, S. aculeatissimum can be distin-
guished from related species by its yellow ripe fruit,
seeds without wings and by its stems with scattered sim-
ple hairs and acicular prickles.
Potential for crop improvement
Several investigators have looked at hybridization
with S. melongena L. (aubergine, brinjal, eggplant). Rao
(1979) reported successful crosses between S. melongena
and S. aculeatissimum. Pearce & Lester (1979) showed
that S. acideatissimum has very little serological rela-
tionship with the taxa of the eggplant complex. Hybrids
produced seed which did not germinate. Daunay, Lester
& Laterrot (1991) recorded that S. aculeatissimum is
resistant to Verticillium, but susceptible to Meloidogyne
spp., which are both eggplant pests.
Notes
The specific epithet refers to the large number of
sharp prickles. Numerous common names have been
recorded e.g. Bailey & Bailey (1977): cockroach berry,
love apple, soda apple nightshade; Wells et al. (1986):
apple-of-Sodom and devil’s apple for southern Africa;
Jeffery RUH4919 (GRA): Peru apple.
The photograph and description published by Rhind
(1975) in a popular journal for South African farmers,
belong to S. aculeatissimum and not to the indigenous
S. panduriforme E.Mey., as claimed in the discussion
accompanying the photograph.
2. Solarium capsicoides Allioni, Auctuarium ad
synopsim methodicam stirpium horti regii Taurinensis:
64 (1773); Dunal: 156 (1852); Symon: 101, t. 29 (1981);
Symon: 118, t. 26A, B (1982); Whalen: 252, t. 28 (1984);
Carvalho: 77 (1985); Jaeger: 477 (1985); Troupin: 378, t.
6
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
121.1 (1985); Bukenya & Hall: 84 (1988); Lemke: 365
(1991); Nee: 261 (1991 ). Type: cultivated at Turin, origin
unknown, Allioni s.n. (TO, holo.).
S. ciliatum Lam.: 21 ( 1794). Type: sheet with label 'S. ciliatum Lam.
illustr. Die. No. 55’ (P-LA).
S. aculeatissimum auett. non Jacq., C.H. Wright: 97 (1904).
S. macowanii Fourc.: 101 ( 1934). Type: Eastern Cape, Humansdorp
Div., Fourcade 1224 (SAM, holo,; K).
Annual or short-lived perennial, herbaceous shrub, erect
to sprawling, occasionally woody at base, sometimes
spreading by rbizomes, up to 1 .5 m high. Stems green or
purplish; stems, petioles, veins of upper and lower leaf sur-
faces, pedicels and calyces bearing scattered to many
prickles, very sharp, straight, pale or straw-coloured, ± nar-
rowly (up to 2 mm) based, 2-14 mm long; sparsely pilose
with 1 .5-5.0 mm long, simple, shiny, uniseriate, few-celled
hairs (stellate hairs absent) and minute, simple, glandular
hairs. Leaves membranous or papery, concolorous green,
broadly ovate in outline, up to 150 x 135 mm, 5-7-lobed,
slightly cordate at base, sinuses reaching about halfway or
less to midrib, lobes and leaf apex acute or obtuse, major
FIGURE 4. — Distribution in the FSA region, of Solanuw capsicoides,
O; and S. viantm, •; (both species 3).
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
7
lobes often entire or slightly repand but scarcely pinnately
lobed, margins ciliate; petiole up to 80 mm long. Flowers
1-7 together on short peduncle, 2-4 mm long, or pedicel-
late on stem in intemodal position; first flowers staminate;
pedicels 10-25 mm long at anthesis. Calyx often prickly;
tube 2-5 mm long; lobes 2-5 mm long, broadly lanceolate
or triangular-ovate, acute, slightly accrescent. Corolla
10-15 X 20-30 mm, deeply stellate with lobes ± 10 mm
long, glabrous inside and outside, white or rarely pale
mauve. Stamens subequal; filaments 1-2 mm long,
glabrous; anthers 3-7 mm long, tapered upwards, erect in
cone, pale yellow; pores minute; pollen 24.0-30.5 pm.
Ovary with some glandular hairs; style 5-8 mm long, erect,
pale, styles of perfect flowers exserted, those of staminate
flowers equalling filaments; stigma green. Fruit slightly
depressed-globular, 20-40 mm diam., bright, matte orange-
scarlet when mature, flesh thick, white, spongy, sweetish
tasting (tasteless?), dryish when ripe, containing ± 300
seeds. Seeds orbicular-ovoid, 4—6 mm diam., flat, minutely
pitted, reticulate, area over embryo pale yellowish or light
brown, bordered by a distinct, pale wing ± 1 .5 mm wide.
Cotyledons broadly ovate-lanceolate, ± 13 x 7 mm, first
true leaves almost orbicular, petioles without spines, later
leaves increasingly lobed. Figure 3.
Distribution
The native range is ‘coastal Brazil south of the Amazon’
(Nee 1979). S. capsicoides is adventive on the Caribbean
Islands, in Central and South America, also in the southern
United States. It is a common weed in southern China and
elsewhere in Asia; also in New South Wales and Queens-
land in Austraha where it is called devil’s apple.
Solanum capsicoides is introduced in tropical and
South Africa (probably as an ornamental) where it is so
far found naturalized only around Durban in KwaZulu-
Natal and in Eastern Cape (Figure 4). It was first collect-
ed in the Durban District in 1895, J.M. Wood 5718 (K,
NH). It was cultivated at the Natal Herbarium in Durban
in 1933, McClean NH26927 (NH), and in a garden in
Cape Town in 1955 (seed from KwaZulu-Natal), Primos
SAM684203 (SAM).
Ecology
Solanum capsicoides is native to coastal Brazil near
Rio de Janeiro and is apparently adapted to the restinga
vegetation of the coastal sand dunes (Nee 1979). It
prefers high rainfall, coastal lowlands of tropical and
subtropical regions. It becomes a naturalized weed in
disturbed sites, clearings, forest margins and other open
habitats. It seems to have a wide ecological range and
Morton (1976) claimed that S. capsicoides (S. ciliatiim)
is hardy as far north as Baltimore, Maryland in the USA.
Man is probably responsible for its initial wide dissemi-
nation; it has been in European botanical gardens for
more than two centuries.
For some unknown reason it has spread fairly slowly
in Africa. In KwaZulu-Natal it was collected at ± 15 m
altitude in shade at the edge of a forest in stony sand on
a disturbed site. It seems to flower and fruit throughout
the year.
Chromosome number, toxic properties and potential for
crop improvement
Fedorov; 695 ( 1969) reported 2n = 24 (as S. ciliatum).
The berries were reported to be poisonous to calves in
Australia (Symon 1982) and Nee (1991) noted that the
fruit is considered to be poisonous in northeastern Brazil.
The fruit of S. capsicoides is used as a cockroach poison
in parts of tropical America and this plant is sometimes
called cockroach berry in the United States (D’Arcy
1974). Its toxicity to humans is unknown. According to
Daunay, Lester & Laterrot ( 1991 ), 5. capsicoides is resis-
tant to Pseudomonas and is a non-host plant for potato
cyst-nematodes. They also reported that S. capsicoides is
graft-compatible with S. melongena, but is not used as a
rootstock as it contains toxic alkaloids.
Taxonomy and diagnostic characters
This species has often been confused with the quite
distinct S. aculeatissimum which has neither winged
seeds nor vermillion fruit. It was also previously known
under the synonym, S. ciliatum (Hepper 1979). Other
synonyms are listed by Lebrun & Stork (1997) and
Whalen (1984). Nee (1979) believed that this species,
which has been known and grown for a long time and has
been described several times under various names, might
have an older name which could emerge from some
obscure publication. He also noted that the slightly
accrescent, stoutly prickly calyx of S. capsicoides might
indicate a relationship with S. sisymbriifolium Lam. of
section Cryptocarpinn Dunal.
Fourcade collected the type of his S. macowanii at
700 ft (± 235 m) altitude in the forest near Storms
River, Humansdorp Div., Eastern Cape, in April 1921,
and quoted another specimen. MacOwan 1493, from
the Somerset East Div., also in Eastern Cape. He stated
that S. macowanii was close to S. acutissimum Jacq.
(sic) ‘from which it differs by the branches and the
lower surface of the leaves being glabrous, by the entire
leaf lobes, and by the flowers being geminate.’ Jaeger,
Nee and Lester all identified the isotype of S. macow-
anii in K as S. capsicoides: PRE has a colour photo-
graph of this specimen. The specimen of MacOwan
1493 in GRA has a much more spiny stem than the type
and one unripe fruit with immature seeds. Apparently S.
capsicoides has not been collected again in Eastern
Cape since 1921 and it could have died out in that area.
Ross (1972) quoted Ward 4888 as S. aculeatissimum
Jacq. in his checklist of the Flora of Noted, but this
specimen has orange-red ripe fruit and winged seeds
and is clearly S. capsicoides.
The large orange-red fruit with winged seeds and the
absence of stellate hairs make S. capsicoides unique in
the southern African context.
Notes
S. capsicoides is occasionally cultivated for its orna-
mental vermillion dry fruits which keep their colour for
a long time. [The large-fruited form common in cultiva-
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
tion is var. macrocarpiim Hort. (Morton 1976).] This
species could have a ‘shaker’ mechanism for seed dis-
persal (Nee 1991). The ripe dry fruit splits irregularly
into 2^ lobes and releases the dry winged seeds, which
adhere neither to each other nor to the pericarp. The inner
fruit wall of the unilocular ovary is ± 4 mm thick, slight-
ly juicy and spongy; it is nearly tasteless and dries to a
virtually invisible thin film soon after the fruit begins to
split. The conspicuous fruit colour could indicate a very
recent derivation from ancestors with bird-dispersed
seeds. Nee ( 1986) noted that the placentas are split into
two ‘horns' and at maturity are attached only to the base
of the fruit. The fruit and seed dispersal method of S.
capsicoides probably is an adaptation to its natural sandy
habitat; the placentation ensures space for a great num-
ber of large seeds. The evolutionary significance of the
winged seed is not clear (Nee 1979). It could perhaps aid
in local dispersal by wind or water.
The species name refers to the resemblance of the
fruit to that of the solanaceous genus Capsicum.
3. Solanum manunosum L., Species plantamm, edn
1: 187 (1753); Dunal; 250 (1852); D’Arcy: 712 (1973);
D’Arcy: 851 (1974); Morton: 201 (1976); Bailey & Bailey:
1055 (1977); Symon: 103 (1981); Jaeger: 479 (1985);
Bukenya & Hall: 83 (1988); Bukenya & Carasco: 51 (1995);
Shaw; 234, 239 (2000). Lectotype: t. 226, fig. 1 in Plukenet,
Phytographia, pars tertia (1692), ‘Habitat in Virginia,
Barbados.’ Typotype: Herb. Sloane vol. 98, fol. 59 (BM); see
Jaeger: 479 ( 1985) and Knapp & Jarvis: 342 (1990).
Annual or short-lived perennial, herbaceous shrub up
to 2 m high. Stems and twigs white or yellow viscid-vil-
lous with 2^ mm long simple hairs, armed with scattered
yellow or green, large acicular prickles, 10-25 mm long,
which with age become flattened, recurved, woody and
brownish. Stems hollow. Leaves suborbicular to broadly
ovate, 60-150 x 120-200 mm, blade pinnatifid with 5-7
main broadly triangular lobes (each lobe ± coarsely, den-
tately lobed), apices acute, bases truncate to cordate,
sinuses rounded; both sides white- or yellow-villous,
upper surface with mainly 2^ mm long, simple glandu-
lar hairs, lower surface with sessile stellate hairs mixed
with long, simple, glandular hairs; armed on principal
veins on both sides with flattened, acicular prickles, 1-2
mm broad, up to 17 mm long; petioles 30-150 mm long,
covered with simple hairs and some straight prickles up to
13 mm long. Inflorescences lateral, extra-axillary, 1^-
flowered cymes/racemes bearing both staminate and her-
maphrodite flowers with only one flower fruiting per
inflorescence, ± sessile or peduncles up to 10 mm long;
pedicels 5-15 mm long, becoming stout and somewhat
longer in fruit, viscid-villous to lanate, sometimes armed
with few small prickles. Calyx 8-10 mm long, deeply
lobed, prickles absent; tube 2 mm long; lobes subulate-
acuminate, pubescent outside. Corolla showy, pale blue
to violet, up to 20 mm long, 40 mm wide, deeply stellate,
lobes linear-lanceolate; hirsute outside, glabrous within.
Stamens equal; filaments 1 mm long; anthers 8-12 mm
long, linear-oblong, tapering with small, apical pores.
Ovary and style glabrous. Fruit globose to broadly ovoid,
30-100 mm long, often with a 20 mm long nipple-like
contraction at apex and 1-5 rounded protrusions at base,
orange to yellow, spongy, pulp white. Seeds compressed-
lenticular, 5-7 mm wide, finely rugose, shiny, purple-red
to dark brown, lacking marginal wing. Figure 5.
Distribution and ecology
Solanum mammosum is native to the Caribbean (Nee
1979), but has spread by long distance dispersal, direct
migration or with the casual or deliberate assistance of
humans to the tropical lowlands of South and Meso-
America. It is now often naturalized in disturbed, lowland
habitats in the tropical and subtropical regions of both hemi-
spheres, though not yet in Africa (Jaeger 1985) or Australia
(Symon 1981). Nee (1991) stated that S. mammosum now
occurs mostly from sea level to 100 m altitude in tropical
America, but can occur as high as 1 800 m. It flowers and
fruits throughout the year with no special season. It can be
expected to become naturalized or to escape locally from
cultivation in areas of high rainfall, whether this is seasonal
or year-round. It has been known as a curiosity in botanical
gardens for several centuries and is occasionally cultivated
as an ornamental in tropical Africa; also in southern Africa
in frost-free or frost-protected localities.
Chromosome number and chemistry
Heiser (1971) gave references of reports for both n =
12 and n = 11; the latter was the first report of n = 11 in
the genus Solanum. Dan & Dan (1984) recorded the
occurrence of nuatigenin and iso-nuatigenin (two rare
isomeric non-nitrogenous sapogenins) as the main root
constituent of S. mammosum and some other species of
Solanum. Roddick (1986) listed 1% of solasodine (dry
weight) in the fruit of S. mammosum, while Mabberley
( 1997) referred to the molluscicidal glycoalkaloids of the
fruit. Nee (1991) stated that the immature fruits contain
the highest concentration of glycoalkaloids and that
other plant parts contain varying amounts or none.
Medicinal and other uses, potential for crop improvement
Solanum mammosum (macaw bush, nipple fmit, pig’s
ears) is widely cultivated in tropical and warm temperate
regions for its unique ornamental but also poisonous fruit.
In the Americas, these fruits are widely used for killing rats
and cockroaches, also for catching fish, extracting maggots
and curing common colds (Nee 1979). Heiser (1971) quot-
ed the use of the leaves as a narcotic in Bolivia. Daunay,
Lester & Laterrot (1991) listed that S. mammosum is resis-
tant to Fusarium wilt and several other pests and diseases
of S. melongena cultivars. They also regarded it as frost
resistant, but susceptible to Meloidogyne incognita and
Verticillium, both pests of S. melongena.
Microscope studies
The glandular villous pubescence in this species is
composed of reduced stellate hairs in which the rays are
fused with the leaf lamina and the mid-point remains as
an apparently simple hair (D’Arcy 1974). The structure
of this hair type is best observed in seedlings. Similar
hairs occur in S. capsicoides (= S. ciliatum), but they
are not so dense and are less commonly glandular.
Whalen & Costich (1986) listed a report on female
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
9
HGURE 5. — A, Solanum nuimmoswn.
Code! 6569 (PRE); B, S. via-
niin, T. Dickers & S. Neser
s.n., grown from seed collect-
ed in Brazil (Cedara Weeds
Laboratory). Artist: G. Condy.
Sterility of short-styled flowers in S. maminosiim, and
noted that embryo sac development in these flowers
was abnormal.
Taxonomy and diagnostic characters
Whalen (1984) and Lebrun & Stork (1997) listed a
number of synonyms for this species. Wright (1904)
expressed doubt whether the S. marnmosiim Thunb. in his
revision of the South African species of Solanum, is the
same as S. mammosum L. The description does not men-
tion the unique fruit. A specimen (Thunherg s.n.) collect-
ed in the Swellendam Div. (Western Cape) in the late
1 8th century is quoted; probably before S. mammosum L.
was introduced into South Africa. However, no specimen
of it was found in Thunberg’s herbarium in 1883.
Solanum mammosum has a pubescent calyx without
prickles, a showy pale blue to violet corolla, yellow.
ripe mammiform fruit and seeds at least 5 mm wide,
lacking marginal wings. In southern Africa, S. mam-
mosum has so far only been recorded in a cultivated
state, and not yet as naturalized or even as a garden
escape.
Notes on the fruit
Miller (1969) made a thorough study of the morphol-
ogy and development of the unusual mammiform fruit of
S. mammosum. Wild specimens in the Western Hemis-
phere show considerable variation in fruit shape, from
entirely globose to mammiform with an apical nipple and
five protuberances at the base. The more unusual forms
were probably selected by man from a teratological
abnormality and used as an ornamental and for its
extremely poisonous fruit. There has apparently also
been a selection for plants less prickly than the wild form
(Nee 1991 ).
10
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Nee (1986) studied placentation patterns in the
Solanaceae. The basic fruit in Solamtm is 2-locular with
a slightly enlarged placental area in the centre of the sep-
tum, from which the seeds radiate into the usually pulp-
filled locules between the septum and the pericarp. In the
mature fruit of S. mammosum, the septum can hardly be
seen, and is only a thin film, easily destroyed; the pla-
centas are connected only at the base. Nee (1979) sug-
gested that the spongy mesocarp may adapt the fruit to
dispersal by water flotation.
4. Solanum viarum Diinal in DC., Prodromus sys-
tematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 13,1: 240 (1852);
Carvalho: 83 (1985); Jaeger: 482 (1985); Nee: 264
(1991); Bryson & Byrd: 382 (1994); Wunderlin et al.:
606, t. 1, 2 (1993). Type: Sao Paulo, Brazil, Lund 799 (G-
DC, holo.,-IDC microf. 2080: I.l).
S. khasianum C.B, Clarke var. chatterjeeanum Sen Gupta: 413 (1961).
Type: Nilgiri District, Madras State, India, K. Submmanyam 10413 (CAL,
holo., iso.).
Straggling, short-lived, perennial herbs or subshrubs,
1-2 m high. Stems much branched at and above base;
stems, petioles, pedicels and leaves densely glandular-
puberulent with ± uniform, multicelled, straight, simple
hairs less than 0.5 mm long, some hairs eglandular; stem
prickles few, most with thickened and flattened bases
and conspicuously recurved, up to 6 mm long. Leaves
solitary or in pairs, membranous, blades broadly ovate to
ovate-triangular, base subcordate, 80-150 x 50-150 mm,
sinuate-lobed up to '/a of way to midrib, lobes 4-6, sub-
obtuse or subacute, lower surface also with 4 or 5-rayed
stellate hairs, rays nearly always in one plane, one ray
longer than rest, up to 0.5 mm long; armed on midrib and
minor veins with straight, acicular, laterally compressed,
broad-based, whitish to yellowish prickles up to 20 mm
long; petioles 20-90 mm long, armed with similar prick-
les. Inflorescences axillary, 4- or 5-flowered; peduncles
stout, 15-20 mm long. Calyx pubescent on outside, 4-7
mm long, 5-lobed to about middle; lobes triangular-
ovate, enlarging and concealing immature fruit, then
prickly on outside. Corolla white or greenish, 15-27 mm
diam., deeply stellately 5-lobed; lobes broadly lanceo-
late, 8-12 mm long, recurved, apex acute to mucronate,
outer surface pubescent with glandular and eglandular
hairs. Stamens white to cream; filaments ± 1 mm long;
anthers linear-lanceolate, attenuate, 8-10 mm long, pores
minute. Ovary globose, densely and minutely puberu-
lent; stigma capitate. Fruit globose, 15-30 mm diam.
when mature, minutely puberulent when young, later
smooth and glabrous, immature fruit pale and dark green
with white mottling, yellow at maturity with leathery
skin surrounding thin-layered, pale green, mucilaginous,
scented pulp. Seeds numerous, 190-385, moderately
compressed, suborbicular, ± 2 mm long, lacking marginal
wing, surface reddish brown, very minutely rugulose,
seed coat closely investing the endosperm. Figure 5.
Distribution
Originally from southern Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay
and northern Argentina, but S. viarum has spread to other
areas of South America, also Central America, the West
Indies and the southern United States (tropical soda
apple). It was introduced into India and Nepal and also
into Africa; it is recorded in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo and possibly also in Cameroon (Jaeger 1985).
Probably accidentally and sporadically introduced into
Africa and can be expected to spread to many other sub-
tropical areas (Nee 1991).
In southern Africa, specimens have been collected in
Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape (Figure 4).
The earliest record seen for this study, was collected in
1962: Marr & Harding 54 (PRE) from the Natal Agri-
cultural Institute, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal.
Ecology
Wunderlin et al. (1993) reported that in Florida S.
viarum is usually found in soils belonging to the order of
Spodosols, that means nearly level, somewhat poorly
drained soils with a spodic horizon 1-2 m below ground
level. In South Africa it has been collected on well-
drained, reddish brown, sandy loam soil, with a western,
northwestern or eastern slope, from 30-800 m in alti-
tude; elsewhere it is reported from low altitudes, mostly
below 100 m. S. viarum prefers full sunlight, but will
also grow in the shade.
It is often a common weed of natural areas, improved
pastures, croplands, roadsides and fence rows, waste
places, open disturbed sites, secondary growth and forest
edges. In southern Africa it was also collected in open
woodland and pine plantations. In more tropical areas,
flowering and fruiting occurs throughout much of the
year (Nee 1991), but in southern Africa flowering and
fruiting material has been collected from November to
April, with one fruiting specimen in August.
Weedy characters, dispersal and control
Solanum viarum can produce up to 50 mature fruits
per plant, each fruit containing numerous seeds. Accord-
ing to Bryson & Byrd (1994), it has been on the Florida
noxious weed list since 1994. It was present in that state
since about 1980 and spread very rapidly and aggres-
sively, being able to form near monocultures in certain
situations, although its opportunistic adaptations may
restrict it to disturbed areas.
Its foliage is generally not grazed by cattle, probably
because it is heavily armed with prickles and glandular
hairs, although they will sometimes eat the bitter mature
fruit. It can be transported from pasture to pasture in con-
taminated hay and farm machinery. The primary means of
dispersal seems to be livestock and wildlife, including
birds. Scarification of seeds by digestive systems of ani-
mals seems to promote seed germination. Movement of
livestock that have recently fed on S. viarum fruit will has-
ten its spread. Bryson & Byrd (1994) found that in mature
plants the root systems were up to 300 mm deep and lat-
eral roots up to I m long. They also found that experi-
mentally detached green fruit more than 20 mm in diame-
ter will ripen in sunlight. Seed gemiination from these
fruits was more than 70%. Fruit from less than 10 mm in
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
diameter up to mature yellow or dry fruit are extremely
buoyant and can then also be dispersed by water. Control
of this plant therefore requires elimination of immature
and mature fruit as well as the whole plant including the
root system.
Chromosome number, chemistry, medicinal use and poten-
tial for crop improvement
Fedorov (1969) gives 2n = 24 as the chromosome num-
ber for S. khasianum.
The section Acanthophora contains several species with
a high alkaloid content (Nee 1991 ). Of these S. viariim is the
species most studied, as it contains a high percentage of sola-
sodine, concentrated in the berries. Dan & Dan (1984) listed
S. vianim as a high solasodine yielding plant (the alkaloid of
pharmaceutical interest). Roddick ( 1986) listed 0.7-3.0% of
solasodine (dry weight) in the fruit. It is a common weed in
India since at least 1932 where it is also grown as a com-
mercial source of this glycoalkaloid which is a key interme-
diate in the synthesis of steroid drugs (Maiti et al. 1979).
Saini ( 1966) found that the ‘fleshy cover’ and washed seeds
of S. khasianum var. chatterjeeanum do not contain any
alkaloid; most is found in the mucilaginous layer around the
seeds. When fmits are dried, the mucilaginous layer dries to
a white powder which is easily lost or is capable of contam-
inating the seed or pericarp assay. This provides an explana-
tion for the discrepancies in the literature of the glycoalka-
loid content from different parts of the fmit. Daunay, Lester
& Laterrot (1991) reported that S. vianim is resistant to the
following diseases of S. melongena: Leiicinodes orbonalis,
Epilachna vigintioctopunctata, Phomopsis blight, ‘little leaf'
and partially resistant to Meloidogyne incognita. It is also a
non-host plant for potato cyst-nematodes.
Taxonomy and diagnostic characters
Morton (1976) regarded S. vianim as a synonym of S.
reflexiim Schrank. However, 5. refle.xiim is a synonym of 5.
aciileatissimiirn, a different but closely related species, see
above (Nee 1991). Lester (1978) pointed out that the descrip-
tion given by Morton for S. refle.xiim, is that of S. vianim.
Lester (1978) also pointed out that careful examination
showed that S. khasianum var. chatterjeeanum (which is
commonly, but incorrectly called simply S. khasianum ) is 5.
vianim. More synonyms are hsted by Lebrun & Stork ( 1 997 ).
A good character for distinguishing S. vianim from all
other species of section Acanthophora is the presence of
glandular hairs on the ovary in young flowers.
In the past, specimens in South African herbaria have
often been misidentified as S. aculeatissimiim, but the
combination of long straight prickles on the leaves and
petioles and short curved prickles on the stems distin-
guishes S. vianim from all other members of Solanum in
southern Africa. The density of the prickles, however, is
an unreliable taxonomic character, particularly in domes-
ticated species of Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum.
Notes
The species name probably refers to the habitat as
described on the type specimen: ‘Ad vias et circa domos
vulgare in provincia Brasiliana S. Pauli’ (Dunal 1852).
The photograph and description published by Rhind
(1969) in a popular journal for South African farmers,
belong to S. vianim and not to the indigenous S. pan-
diiriforme E.Mey. ex Dunal, as claimed in the discussion
accompanying the photograph.
Section Torva Nees in Transactions of the Linnean
Society of London 17: 37-82 ( 1 837). Type species: S. tor-
viim Sw. (D’Arcy 1972).
Description', based on Whalen (1984); Jaeger (1985);
Hepper & Jaeger ( 1986).
Large shrubs or small trees, 2-10 m high; early growth
prickly on both stems and leaves; later growth usually
unarmed or only sparsely prickly or bristly; sympodial
units difoliate, commonly with geminate leaves; cauline
pubescence of stalked or sessile stellae, varying in densi-
ty, often with reduced midpoints; cauline prickles, when
present, usually straight, subulate or broad-based, lateral-
ly compressed. Leaves petiolate, large and repand on
early growth; later leaves medium to large, ovate to
broadly ovate, 30-140 x 70-300 mm, entire, repand or
lobed, usually unarmed, stellate-pubescent on both sur-
faces, with stalked stellae below, pubescence of upper
surface very variable in structure and diagnostic of spe-
cies. Inflorescences corymbose or cymose, lateral or ter-
minal and becoming lateral by continued shoot growth,
usually unarmed, remote from leaves, asymmetrically
several- to many-branched, rarely simple, inflorescence
branches monochasial, bearing female-sterile flowers
with reduced gynoecia distally; peduncles short or well
developed; pedicels unarmed, slender and flexuous in
flower. Calyx variable, from nearly truncate to attenuate-
lobed. Corolla white or lavender, stellate-pentagonal or
less commonly deeply stelliform with narrow, nearly sep-
arate lobes. Stamens with anthers equal, slender and
tapering. Fruit: berries small to medium, 5-15 mm diam.,
glabrous, 4-locular; pericarp tough and leathery, green,
dull yellow or brown when ripe; flesh saponaceous and
sticky. Chromosome number: n = 12, rarely 24, 36.
Distribution
Whalen (1984) included some 50 species in his S.
ton’iim group, occurring from Mexico to southeastern
Brazil, with many endemics, mostly in South America.
He believed that there may also be several species
indigenous to southeastern Asia and the East Indies. Two
species are widely introduced in the Old World tropics.
Solanum ton’iim Sw., originally from Mexico, Central
America and the West Indies, is now a common intro-
duced weed throughout the tropics of both hemispheres,
but it has not been listed before for southern Africa
(Welman 1993). S. chrysotrichiim Schltdl. (=5. hispidum
auctt. non Pers.) originally from Mexico to Panama, is
now widely introduced in the Palaeotropics. In the past,
this species was often misidentified as S. hispidum Pers.,
but true 5. hispidum Pers. is restricted to the Andes of
southern Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.
Ecology
According to Whalen (1984), the habitat preferences
of section Tor\’a are variable, ranging from sea level to
12
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
over 3 000 m altitude, often in forest edges, grazed fields,
and other places where direct sunlight is available. Most
of the species show weedy tendencies. These large
shrubs or trees are characteristic of secondary vegetation
and grazed lands throughout the montane Neotropics.
Species grow in understoreys and edges of montane and
seasonal forest, in dry tropical woodland, in savanna, and
even in subalpine elfinwoods.
Taxonomy
Bitter (1921) placed the Afro-Asian plants (series
Giganteiformia Bitter) under the Neotropical section
Torvaria Bitter (section Torva Nees). Whalen (1984)
and Jaeger (1985) claimed that section Torva is cladis-
tically not closely related to the Afro-Asian species,
the former separating the Giganteum group, the latter
keeping them together for convenience. Jaeger (1985)
emphasized the particular differences between the
neotropical Torva (lobate leaves, bifoliate geminate sym-
podial units, white flowers and firmer, larger, green to
yellow fruits) and the African endemic species of the
series Giganteiformia Bitter, raised to sectional level
as Giganteiformia (Bitter) Child in 1998. Species of
that section have plurifoliate sympodia, inflorescences
with shortened, umbelloid branches, and succulent,
red, translucent berries. Nee (1991) suggested that sec-
tion Acanthophora may have been derived from the
large section Torva.
Morphology and reproductive biology
Child (1979) noted that section Tor\’a has many-flow-
ered corymbose cymes where most flowers are hermaph-
rodite and fully fertile. Nee ( 1979) recorded that it is com-
mon in section Torva for the flowering branches to lack
prickles, whereas the lower stem or young shoots are quite
prickly. Whalen & Costich (1986) stated that section Tonm
is weakly andromonoecious, short-styled flowers are pre-
sent, fruit size is small and the species are self-compatible.
Child & Lester (1991) gave the following summary of sec-
tion Torva: trifoliate sympodial units with anisophyllous
geminate leaf clusters, inflorescences subsessile to pedun-
culate, generally lateral, leaf remote to subopposed, pleioto
monochasial, pleiochasia with most flowers hermaphro-
dite, fully fertile, but fewer-flowered inflorescences with
often only proximal flower(s) hermaphrodite, distal flowers
brachystylous, functionally male, some taxa androdi-
oecious; mostly shrubs to trees, some climbers.
Potential for crop improvement
Daunay, Lester & Laterrot (1991) noted that sterile
hybrids have been obtained by artificial crosses between
S. melongena and species of section Torva.
Key to naturalized species in southern Africa
(after Jaeger 1985)
la. Inclumcnium ot young parts ol'f-white; inllorescence axes
with simple glandular hairs; calyx lobes in flower 4 mm
long, sinuses glabrous; corolla less than 30 mm diam. . . .
S. torviim
lb. Indumentum of young parts rust-coloured; inflorescence
axes and calyx sinuses not as above; calyx lobes in
flower 7 mm long; corolla 30-50 mm diam. . . S. chrysotrichum
5. Solanum chrysotrichum Schltdl. in Linnaea 19:
304 (1847); Shaw: 234, 238 (2000). Type: Mexico, Las
Trojes, Nov., C. Scliiede 81 (HAL).
S. hispidum auctt. non Pers. (1805); D’Arcy; 703 ( 1973); Gentry &
Standley; 121 (1974); Bailey & Bailey: 1055 (1977); Gbile: 116
(1979); Symon: 113, t. 35, 150, 161 (1981); Symon: 121 (1982);
Jaeger: 346 (1985).
5. warscewiczii Hort. ex Lambertye: 429 (1865). Type: cultivated,
L. Lambertye s.n. (W).
S. pynaertii De Wild.; 437, t. 119 (1907). Type: Boma, Congo, L.
Pynaert 302 (BR?).
Evergreen shrub or small tree up to 7 m high (in South
Africa up to 3 m high), trunk up to 200 mm diam. Prickles
2-6 mm long, stout, usually sparse on stems, petioles and
veins on upper and lower leaf surfaces, flattened towards
broad, often pubescent base, straight or slightly recurved,
rarely absent. Pubescence on all parts of stellate hairs (ses-
sile or long, multi-seriate-stalked, porrect-stellate with
medium or long central cell). Stems grooved and sparsely
stellate when old, stem and young parts with ferruginous
tomentum. Leaves solitary, usually broadly ovate to ellip-
tical, ± 200-300 X ± 250^00 mm, rarely entire, margins
mostly sinuate to lobed, with 7-13 lobes, sinuses cut one
quarter of way to midrib, lobe apices obtuse, acute or
acuminate, sinuses rounded, leaf base equal or oblique,
truncate or rounded to subcordate; upper surface scabrid
and covered with appressed hairs, lower surface densely
covered with stellate hairs and nerves sparsely prickly;
petiole up to 180 mm long, terete, with (0)3-10 prickles.
Inflorescences extra-axillary, branched, dense scorpioid
cymes with 30-50 flowers; peduncles 10-25 mm long,
variable; pedicels 10-15 mm long, enlarged in fruit up to
5 mm diam. below calyx with marked corky thickening.
Calyx densely stellate-pubescent; tube 3^ mm long; lobes
linear or lanceolate, 4—6 mm long, acuminate, in fruit
broader and thicker, at first appressed, later somewhat
reflexed. Corolla white, 30-50 mm diam., stellate; lobes
10-15 mm long, sparsely stellate-pubescent along mid-
vein inside, densely stellate-pubescent outside, apices
acute. Stamens with filaments 1-3 mm long; anthers 7-9
mm long, yellow, slender, erect, not coherent, tapered,
dehiscing by small terminal pores and also longitudinally
in basal portion of anther. Ovary sometimes tuberculate,
ovary and style base sparsely glandular-pubescent; style
9.0-13.5 mm long, glabrous; stigma bluntly 2-lobed, pale
green. Fruit globose, 10-15 mm diam., at first green, later
yellowish to drab orange-yellow, brown when dry,
glabrous, glossy, hard, not particularly fleshy, mucilagi-
nous. Seeds 2-3 mm diam., flat, light brown, shiny, with-
out obvious surface pattern, 100-250 per fruit. Cotyledons
4x10 mm, oblong; petioles 5 mm long, first true leaves
ovate, scarcely lobed, not prickly until about fourth leaf.
Figure 3.
Distribution
Solanum chrysotrichum is native to tropical Central
America from southern Mexico to Costa Rica and Panama.
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
13
FIGURE 6. — Distribution in the FSA region, of Solaiium chrysotrichum,
•; and S. tonnim. U.
It had been introduced widely in the Old World tropics as
an ornamental plant, and has now been naturalized in
many areas, such as in disturbed sites in the Brisbane
area of Queensland (Australia) where it is known as giant
devil’s fig (Symon 1982). It has been collected in West
Africa (e.g. Nigeria), Zimbabwe and Malawi and also in
southern Africa.
In southern Africa, S. chrysotrichum seems to be natu-
ralized only in Eastern Cape from about the Albany to the
Libode Districts (Figure 6). The oldest record seen in this
study dates from 1909, collected near Grahamstown (Molly
A7788, GRA). It is sometimes cultivated in gardens in that
province or persists as a garden relic, e.g. Jacot Giiillarmod
4567 (GRA); Bums, Olyott & Potts 11 (GRA).
Ecology
In its native area. S. chrysotrichum is found in moist
or wet thicket, sometimes in oak or oak-pine forests or in
fields at 1 200-2 500 m in altitude (Gentry & Standley
1974). In South Africa it grows at an altitude of ± 250 m,
in full sun and scattered along roadsides and in other dis-
turbed areas. It is also occasional on riverbanks and near
water courses, in hillside scrub and valley vegetation
where it can be found with Zantedeschia, Senecio ilici-
folius and aliens like Acacia longifolius, A. mekmoxylon
and Melia azedarach. Wells et al. (1986) described S.
chrysotrichum as a summer rainfall ruderal and flora
weed, which does not seem to spread aggressively. In
South Africa, it appears to flower almost throughout the
year, while fruiting is from October to June.
Morphology
Roe (1971) described the stem hairs of S. chryso-
trichum from Mexico as multiseriate-stalked, porrect-
stellate with rather short central rays. Gbile & Sowunmi
(1979) described the pollen of S. chrysotrichum as oblate-
spheroidal with a triangular amb and indistinct sexine
pattern. The polar axis is ± 21.6 pm and the equatorial
diameter is ± 22.0 pm.
Chromosome number and chemistry
Fedorov ( 1969) reported the chromosome number n =
12 for S. chrysotrichum (as S. hispidum).
Dan & Dan ( 1984) reported that the fruits and leaves
of S. chrysotrichum contain non-nitrogenous spirostane
sapogenins and are devoid of any alkaloid. The major
leaf constituents are the spirostane sapogenins neo-
chlorogenin and paniculogenin. The chemical consti-
tuents of the roots of S. cluysotrichum are not known.
Uses and potential for crop improvement
No reports of any medicinal use of S. chrysotrichum
were found in the literature. It is a garden subject in the
warmer parts of the world. Khan (1979) reported that S.
chrysotrichum had been crossed with the economically
important 5. melongena L. and produced fertile hybrids.
Daunay, Fester & Faterrot (1991 ) reported that S. chry-
sotrichum is resistant to Pseudomonas, Meloidogyne and
Verticillium, and partially resistant to Thielaviopsis, all
of which attack S. melongena. It is also a non-host plant
for potato-cyst nematodes.
Taxonomy
Most literature references to S. hispidum refer to S.
chrysotrichum. True S. hispidum Pers. is from the Andes;
the upper surface of the leaves is hairless or almost so
(Shaw 2000). D’Arcy (1973) reported that S. chryso-
trichum can hybridize with S. torvum in nature, at least in
Panama.
Diagnostic characters and derivation of species name
Solanum chrysotrichum differs from all other species
of Solanum in southern Africa by its coarse, reddish brown
pubescence, particularly on the calyx, stems, young parts
and main veins on the underside of the leaves. The species
name refers to the indumentum of golden (reddish brown)
hairs.
6. Solanum torvum Sw., Nova genera et species
plantarum; 47 (1788); Dunal: 260 (1852); C.H. Wright:
231 (1906); Heine: 333 (1963); D'Arcy: 708 (1973);
Gentry & Standley: 139, t. 19 ( 1974); Gbile: 118(1979);
Symon: 1 15, t. 36 ( 1981 ); Symon: 122 ( 1982); Symon:
152 (1985); Jaeger: 344 (1985); Troupin: 382 (1985);
Bukenya & Hall: 86 ( 1988); D'Arcy & Rakotozafy: 129
(1994). Type; ‘India Occidentalis’ (Jamaica), O. Swartz
s.n. (S, holo.).
S. mannii C.H. Wright: 129 (1894). Types: Gabon. Soyaux 329 (P,
syn.j; Fernando Po, Mann 55 (?K, syn.).
S. mannii C.H. Wright var. compactum C.H. Wright: 129 ( 1894). S.
torvum Sw. var. compactum (C.H. Wright) C.H. Wright: 231 (1906).
Types: Angola, Welwitsch 6105 (COI, syn.); Welwitsch 6052, 6080
(COI, syn.); Monteiro s.n. (COI, syn.).
Shrub up to 3 m high; branches terete, tomentose
with yellowish brown, rarely reddish brown, stipitate-
stellate and/or sessile-stellate hairs; usually armed with
14
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
few straight or recurved compressed prickles which are
usually pubescent basally, up to 7 x 8 mm. Leaves ± dis-
colorous, solitary or sometimes in pairs, similar in
shape, different in size, broadly ovate to oblong or ellip-
tic, up to 180 X 250 mm, apex acuminate or acute, base
mostly unequal, obtuse to subcordate, margins subentire
to deeply lobed, with 2-4 pairs of lobes (uncommon in
our area), upper surface scabrid with dispersed stipitate-
stellate or sessile-stellate hairs, lower surface densely,
softly tomentose with mostly stipitate-stellate hairs,
veins rarely armed; petioles 10-100 mm long, softly
stellate-hairy. Inflorescences lateral and internodal,
corymbose cymes, several- to ± 50-flowered, lateral,
distal flowers with short styles, functionally male; inflores-
cence axes with simple glandular hairs; peduncles 10-30
mm long, usually 1 -branched less than 100 mm from
base, tomentose, hairs sessile-stellate and shortly stipi-
tate-stellate; pedicels ± 5 mm long, purple, drying dark,
hispid-viscid with mostly glandular simple and sessile-
stellate hairs, elongating up to 22 mm and thickening in
fruit, then sometimes recurved. Calyx purplish, 3-6 mm
long, hispid-viscid outside with glandular sessile-stel-
late hairs, glabrous within, 5-lobed; lobes 1.0-2. 5 mm
long initially, linear or subulate, calyx splitting with age,
then lobes 2-5 mm long, lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate,
apex mucronate, sinuses glabrous. Corolla white, 15-30
mm diam., sessile-stellate pubescent outside, glabrous
within, 5-lobed; lobes lanceolate, each with prominent
dark lengthwise line inside, 5-12 mm long. Stamens
with filaments 1.0-1. 5 mm long, glabrous; anthers lin-
ear-lanceolate, 6-10 mm long, often oblique basally,
tapering above and dehiscing by minute terminal pores.
Ovary globose, with short glandular, simple hairs near
apex; style 8-1 1 mm long, curved, glabrous or sparsely
glandular-hairy at base. Fruit globose, 10-15 mm diam.,
glabrous, dull, mucilaginous, produced in clusters of
few to 10, yellow-green to dirty brown when ripe, dry-
ing black. Seeds flattened-discoid, 1.5-2. 5 mm across,
buff-coloured, indistinctly reticulate, ± 350 per fruit.
Figure 1 .
Distribution and ecology
Solanum torvum is native to the West Indies and
Meso-America, but is now a common weed throughout
the humid tropics. It grows in forest areas of west, east
and central tropical Africa, also in Madagascar; in south-
ern Africa it is found in the districts of Mtunzini, Lower
Tugela, Inanda and Durban in KwaZulu-Natal (Figure
6). The oldest record seen in this study dates from 1932:
Gcdpin 11868 (PRE) was collected on the Lower Tugela
River bank, Stanger. This species was cultivated in a gar-
den in Stellenbosch in 1937 [Herre NBGl 62978 (NBG)].
In the early 1950s the Durban Botanical Station cultivat-
ed S. torvum from seed received from Buitenzorg, Java
in 1949 \ Wager NH64099, 64100 (NH)].
In its native area, S. torvum is a very common weedy
shrub of the lowlands and grows in dry or wet thickets,
often in secondary growth, just above sea level to 1 500
m. Elsewhere it can be an aggressive weedy species in
humid areas, generally at low altitudes where it becomes
common in disturbed sites such as old gardens, pastures,
roadsides and other waste places, also near human habi-
tation. It thrives well on good soils and grows quickly in
abandoned clearings and becomes common in exploited
forest reserves. It is well established along the tropical
coastline of eastern Queensland (Australia) where it is
regarded as a noxious weed (devil’s fig) and suspected of
poisoning stock (Symon 1982).
Solanum torvum is a successful colonizer because of
its weedy and opportunistic characters: it fruits plentiful-
ly and produces large numbers of seeds per fruit. The
seeds germinate quickly in sunlit conditions, showing
that dormancy is controlled by shade (Hall & Swaine
1980). Husaini & Iwo (1990) noted that in Nigeria, S.
torvum grows in damp places, in soil with a pH of 6.1
such as ferrasols, ferruginous tropical soils and lithosols.
In southern Africa S. torvum grows from about sea
level to 200 m, often on red clayey sand, along river and
stream banks, in swamp forest, open shrubland, coastal
thorny bush and secondary scrub, often in clearings and
other disturbed places. It does not seem to be an aggres-
sive weed in this area. In KwaZulu-Natal flowering and
fruiting material have been collected from April to Oc-
tober.
Morphology
Ahmad (1964) noted that the stomata on the lower
leaf surface are 27 x 22 pm in size. The epidermal cell
walls on the lower leaf surface are sinuous, whereas
those on the upper surface are slightly sinuous. Ogundipe
& Daramola (1997) found that the stomata are narrowly
elliptical in surface view outline; stomata are present on
both leaf surfaces. They also found that the abaxial and
adaxial cells are both irregular in shape. The abaxial anti-
clinal cell walls are wavy while the adaxial anticlinal cell
walls are wavy-sinuous. The outer periclinal walls are
flat. The abaxial and adaxial cells are both ± 38 x 19 pm
in size.
Ahmad (1964) noted that the hairs on both the upper
and lower leaf surfaces are of two types: firstly unicel-
lular and dagger-shaped and secondly stellate with an
elongated many-celled, multi-seriate stalk bearing 4-9
rays. Bukenya & Hall (1988) found that the young
leaves have dense, stalked, stellate hairs on both sur-
faces; mature leaves have more or less sessile, stellate
hairs on the upper surface, 4-6-armed with one arm
much longer than the rest, whereas the lower surface has
stalked, stellate hairs of 8 or 9 more or less equal arms.
Gbile & Sowunmi (1979) described the pollen of S.
torvum as subprolate with a circular amb and distinct
sexine pattern. The polar axis is ± 25.9 pm and the equa-
torial diameter is ± 21.2 pm.
Chromosome number and chemistry
Eedorov ( 1 969) and Daunay, Lester & Laterrot (1991)
reported a chromosome number of n = 12. Randell &
Symon (1976) reported n = 24; this was confirmed by
Husaini & Iwo (1990).
The roots and leaves of this species yield steroid alka-
loids of the 3-aminospirostane group (Schreiber 1979).
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
15
Dan & Dan ( 1984) reported that the major leaf constituents
of S. ton’iirn are the spirostane sapogenins neochlorogenin
and paniculogenin. The leaves, fruits and roots contain
non-alkaloidal as well as alkaloidal sapogenins. The roots
contain jurubidine which is a 3-amino-spirosolane alka-
loid. Jaeger (1985) noted that the steroidal alkaloids sola-
sodine and jurubidine as well as the sapogenins chloro-
genin and neochlorogenin/paniculogenin had been record-
ed for S. ton'um. Mabberley (1997) listed this species as
one of the commercial sources of solasodine.
Culinary uses
Jain & Borthakur ( 1986) noted that in India the ripe
fruits of S. tonnim are eaten as a vegetable. Bukenya &
Hall ( 1988) reported that the fruits are collected in some
parts of Ghana and used in soup and stew. D’Arcy &
Rakotozafy ( 1994) reported that this species is cultivated
in countries like India and Myanmar for its fruits which
are used as seasoning. Mabberley ( 1997) noted that in Sri
Lanka the fruits are used in curry after the toxic seeds
have been removed.
Medicinal and traditional uses
Jain & Borthakur (1986) recorded that in India S.
torx’um alone or in combination with other medicinal
plants, is used for chest pain (fruits), snake bite and
insect stings (leaves), stomach pain (fruits and roots),
antidote to poisoning (roots), malaria (bark), night blind-
ness (fruits), tooth infections (fruits). Lu (1986) recorded
that in China the roots of this species, containing juru-
bidine, jurustune and other compounds, are used to ‘dis-
perse extravasated blood,’ relieve pain and alleviate
coughs. Gbile & Adesina ( 1988) noted that the ripe fruits
are used for liver and spleen complaints; the fruits are
expectorant and sedative. Roddick (1991) listed S.
tor\’um as an antidote for various poisons, toothache,
snake and insect bites and as an ingredient in malarial
preparations in India and as a cough medicine and gen-
eral pain killer in China.
Potential for crop improvement
Solanum tor\mm is graft-compatible with S. melonge-
na and is resistant to Pseudomonas, Meloidogyne,
Verticillium, Thielaviopsis, Phytophthora parasitica and
the Phytophthora and Fusarium solani complex. It is
resistant to Epilachna vigintioctopunctata and to little
leaf disease, but highly susceptible to Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides. It is a non-host plant for potato cyst-
nematodes (Daunay et al. 1991). In Cuba 5. laciniatum
Alton, which is cultivated as an important source of the
alkaloid solasodine, has been grafted onto S. torxmm
(Esquivel & Hammer 1991).
Taxonomy
Gooding (1965) rejected the name S. tor\nim Sw. as an
illegitimate and superfluous substitute by Swartz for S.
indicum L. and replaced it with the later name S.ficifoli-
um Ortega. However, Heine (1976) and Hepper (1978)
pointed out that Swartz realized that Linnaeus had
included both Old and New World elements under his
S. indicum references. Swartz then grouped the West
Indian element under S. torvum, which is a legitimate
name, with his own material as type.
Solanum torxmm has become naturalized widely and
as a result, numerous synonyms have been recorded
(Bitter 1921; Gentry & Standley 1974; Symon 1981;
Lebrun & Stork 1997). Only synonyms based on African
types are listed in the present article. The fact that the
leaves of this species present a great range of leaf size
and lobing, depending on age and vigour, also caused
several superfluous varieties to be described. In Central
America it seems to hybridize with several other similar
species (D’Arcy 1974); this makes the taxonomy of the
section complicated.
Wright (1904) listed 5. ferrugineum for the Durban
area in KwaZulu-Natal, but described the fruit as black;
Bitter (1921) believed that he was not dealing with the
true S. ferrugineum. The specimens quoted were not seen
in this study. Wright (1906) listed S. ferrugineum as a
synonym of S. torvum, but Bitter (1921) disagreed with
that, as he regarded these two species as related but dif-
ferent. D'Arcy (1973) also regarded S. ferrugineum as a
synonym of S. torvum, but Nee (2001) viewed them as
two distinct species.
Notes on stx'lar heteromorphism
Hossain (1973) studied stylar heteromorphism in S.
torxmm, the term used when two forms of flower are
noticeable in each inflorescence, a character seen in sev-
eral species of Solanum. In one form, the style is long
and distinctly exserted; in the other, it is short and includ-
ed within the conically connivent anthers, so that it is not
visible from outside in an open flower. Hossain noted
that in S. torxmm the later-formed distal flowers have
slightly reduced ovaries and much shortened styles, and
so act as male flowers, forming a small proportion of the
inflorescence. Only the lower flowers in any inflores-
cence are structurally hermaphrodite which explains the
characteristic incomplete fruit set in this species.
Diagnostic characters and derivation of species name
In southern Africa S. torxmm can be recognized by its
rough, hairy leaves and its many-flowered inflorescences
with fairly large white flowers and numerous large yel-
lowish berries, drying black. Sterile specimens can be
confused with S. anguivi Lam., but S. torxmm has dense,
fairly short-rayed stellate hairs on both sides of the leaf,
whereas S. anguivi has fewer stellate hairs each with a
single long ray or midpoint. Symon (1985) stated that
since the specific epithet means savage, gloomy, grim
and fierce, it could refer to the drab aspect of the plant or
the stout prickles on the stems.
SPECtMENS EXAMINED
(southern Africa only)
Specimens held at PRE, unless otherwise indicated.
The numbers in brackets indicate the identity of the
specimens; (1) S. aculeatissimunr, (2) S. capsicoides; (3)
S. mammosunr, (4) S. viaruim, (5) S. chrysotrichum', (6) S.
torxmm.
16
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Acocks 10787 (1) NH, PRE. Acocks & Hafstrom 1375 (1). Arnold
NBG109203 (4) NBG; NBG109367 (5) NBG.
Barker 8253 (1) NBG. Bond A15 (5) GRA. Bos 1047 (1). Bottomley
s.n. (3). Bradley 49 (\) GRA. Braun 1843 (4). Bredenkamp 1430 (1).
Brink 276 (5) GRA, PRE; 793 (5) GRA. Burns, Olyott & Potts 11 (5)
GRA.
Carbiener PRE41371 (2). Codd 6569 0). Connell PRE41379 ( 1 ). Cooper
1147 (\). Crawford 441 (1).
Devenish 1001. 1789 (\). De Villiers NBG 1 0502 0) NBG. De Winter
8251 A ( 1 ). Dieterlen 887 (\) NBG, NH, PRE, SAM.
Eckhardt 465 (\) PRU.
Flanagan 1165 (1) GRA, PRE. Forbes NH34644 (1) NH. Forbes &
Obermeyer 64 (2) NH, PRE. Forester 2(1). Fourcade 992 ( 1 ) GRA.
Fraser & Burns 21 (5) GRA. Froneman 8 (4) Lowveld Botanical
Garden.
Galpin 11868 (6) NH, PRE; 14539 ( 1 ). Garrett 69 (4) NH. Geldenhuys
668 (1). Groenewald 146 (4) NH. Gerstner 5660 (1). Giffen s.n. (1)
GRA. PRE.
Harding 39N, PRE819 (1). Henderson 737 ( 6); 940 (5). Herre
NBG162978 (6) NBG. Hewitt A7789 ( 5) GRA. Hilliard 8229 (1).
Hilliard & Bunt 15098 (1). Hoole N6 (5) GRA; s.n. (1) GRA, PRE.
Hulley s.n. (5); A7790 (5) GRA; 22 (4) NH, PRE; 40. 46. 135, 232 (4)
Cedara Weeds Laboratory; 44 (1) GRA, PRE; 159 (1) Cedara Weeds
Laboratory; 231 (1) GRA. Hulley & Dickers 284 (4) Cedara Weeds
Laboratory, GRA; 335 (4) Cedara Weeds Laboratory. Huntley 464 ( 1 ).
Hutchinson, Forbes & Verdoorn 74 ( 1 ).
Jacot Guillarmod 4567, 6836 (5) GRA; 7904 (5) GRA, PRE; Jeffery
RUH4919(\)GKN.
MacDonald 25 (5). MacOwan 1424 (1) SAM; 1493 (2) GRA. Mally
A7788 (5) GRA. Marr & Harding 54 (4) NH, PRE. Martin
RUH8014(c) (5) GRA. Matthews 27 (1) PRU. McCallum PRE41368
(1). McClean NH26927 (2) NH. McClean & Bayer 55 (1). McDonald
& Smit 6(1) PRU. Moffett, Daemane & Taoana 5313 ( 1 ) PRE, QWA.
Mogg 1019 (1). Mohle 71 (1) Lowveld Botanical Garden, PRE. Moll
1880 (4) NH, PRE; 2191 (6) NH, PRE; 3452 (1) NH, PRE. Muller &
Scheepers 223 ( 1 ).
Ngwenya 1186 (6) NH, PRE, Nicholas 2033 (1) NH. Noel RUH 10623
(5) GRA.
Obenneyer 933 (1). Dickers s.n. (4) Cedara Weeds Laboratory. Dliver
7(6) NH, PRE.
Pctppe SAM 1 8603 (\) SAM, Pegler 142 (\) GRA; 142A, 142B, 142C
( 1 ). Pentz & Acocks 10344 (6) NH, PRE. Phillipson 1198 ( 1 ) GRA,
PRE. Pienaar 34 (3) NH, PRE. Pont s.n. (5). Pott TRV13649,
TRV14902, TRV16808 ( 1 ). Priinos SAM684203 (2) SAM.
Rogers 18078 ( 1 ). Rudatis NBG162972 ( 1 ) NBG.
Saainum 633 (1). Scheepers 538 (1) PRE, PRU. Schlechter 6528 (1)
GRA. Sim 19998 (1). Stahnans 542 (1). Stirton 6273, 6291 (1); 6306
(5); 7452 (A) NH; 8649 (A) NH, PRE.
Theron 993 ( 1 ). Thode 4218, 5134, 5135 ( 1 ) NBG. Trauseld 597 ( 1 ).
Tyson 2929(1) SAM.
Van der Schijff 4895 (1) PRE, PRU; 5636 (1). Van Vuiiren 95 (1).
A.E.yan Wvk 13111 (1 ) PRU, Pvan Wyk BSA2511 (6) PRU. Van Wyk &
Theron 4586 ( I ) PRE, PRU,
Wager NH64099, NH64100 (6) NH. Ward 2884 ( 1 ) NH; 4888 (2) NH,
PRE; 4897 (A); 11176 (6) NH, PRE. Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1205 ( 1 ).
Wells 4021 (A) NH, PRE, West 1148 ( 1 ) NH, PRE. Wood 5718 (2) NH.
Wylie NH22472 (1) NH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr R.N. Le.ster, University of Biimingham, United King-
dom, is thanked for the identification of some S. capsi-
coides, S. tonntm and S. viariim specimens and also for
the colour photograph of the isotype of S. macowanii at
Kew. Ms G. Condy is thanked for the line drawings for
this article. The Curators of GRA, NBG, NH, PRE, PRU
and SAM are thanked for loans of their specimens; also
the curator of the herbarium at the Lowveld Botanic
Garden, Nelspruit (National Botanical Institute) and Mr
T. Dickers of the Cedara Weeds Laboratory, KwaZulu-
Natal. The referees are thanked for valuable advice.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1988. Veld Types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South A frica No. 57: 30, 94.
AHMAD, K.J. 1964. Epidermal studies in Solanum. Lloydia 27:
243-250.
ALLIONI. C. 1773. Auctuarium ad synopsim methodicam stirpium
horti regii Taurinensis. Turin.
BAILEY, L.H. & BAILEY, E.Z. 1977. Hortus third, a concise dictio-
nary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada.
Macmillan, New York.
BITTER, G. 1919. Die papuasischen Arten von Solanum. Botanische
Jahrhiicher 55: 59-113.
BITTER, G. 1921. Solana africana III. Botanische Jahrbiicher 57:
248-286.
BITTER, G. 1923. Solana africana IV. Repertorium specierum nova-
rum regni vegetabilis. Beiheft 16: 1-320.
BRYSON, C.T. & BYRD, J.D. 1994. Solanum viarum (Solanaceae),
new to Mississippi. Sida 16: 382-385.
BUKENYA, Z.R. & CARASCO. J.F. 1995. Solanum (Solanaceae) in
Uganda. Bothalia 25: 43-59.
BUKENYA, Z.R. & HALL, J.B. 1988, Solanum (Solanaceae) in Ghana.
Bothalia 18: 79-88.
BUKENYA-ZIRABA, Z.R. 1996. Uses, chromosome number and dis-
tribution of Solanum species in Uganda. In L.J.G. van der
Maesen, X.M. van der Burgt & J.M. van Medenbach de Rooy,
The biodiversity of African plants: 33-37. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht.
CARVALHO, L. D" AVILA F. DE 1985. Flora fanerogamica da reserva
do parque estadual das fontes do Ipiranga (Sao Paulo, Brasil).
136. Solanaceae. Hoehnea 12: 67-85.
CHILD, A. 1979. A review of branching patterns in the Solanaceae. In
J.G, Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding, The biology and
taxonomy of the Solanaceae: 345-356, Linnean Society of
London.
CHILD, A. 1998. Studies in Solanum and related genera (6). New infra-
generic taxa for the genus Solanum L. (Solanaceae). Feddes
Repertorium 109: 407^27.
CHILD, A. & LESTER, R.N. 199 1 . Life form and branching within the
Solanaceae. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M. Nee & N. Estrada,
Solanaceae 111: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution: 151-159.
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Linnean Society of London,
CLARKE, C.B. 1883. Solanaceae. In J.D. Hooker, The Flora of British
India A: 228-246.
DALZIEL, J.E. 1937. The useful plants of West tropical Africa. Crown
Agents for Oversea Government and Administrations, London.
DAN, S. & DAN, S.S. 1984. Chemotaxonomy of the genus Solanum.
Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 5; 875-879.
D’ARCY, W.G, 1972. Solanaceae studies II. Typification of subdivi-
sions of Solanum. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 59:
262-278.
D’ARCY, W.G. 1973. Flora of Panama, part IX. Family 170, Solana-
ceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 60; 573-780.
D’ARCY, W.G. 1974. Solanum and its close relatives in Florida.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 819-867.
D’ARCY, W.G. & RAKOTOZAFY, A, 1994. Flore de Madagascar et
de Comores, Famille 176, Solanacees: 129, 130.
DAUNAY, M.-C., LESTER, R.N. & LATERROT, H. 1991 . The use of
wild species for the genetic improvement of brinjal eggplant
(Solanum melongena) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).
In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M. Nee & N. Estrada, Solanaceae
111: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution: 389^12. Royal Botanic
Gardens Kew and Linnean Society of London.
DON, G. 1838. Solanum section Aculeata subsection Acanthophora.
General System of Gardening and Botany A. London.
DUNAL, M.F 1813. Histoire naturelle, me'dicale et economkjue des
Solanum et des genres c/ui out ete confondus avec eux. Paris,
Strasbourg, Montpellier.
DUNAL, M.F 1852. Solanaceae. In A.P. de Candolle, Prodromus sys-
tematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 13: 1-690. Masson, Paris.
ESQUIVEL, M. & HAMMER, K. 1991. The cultivated species of the
family Solanaceae in Cuba. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M.
Nee & N. Estrada, Solanaceae 111: taxonomy, chemistry, evolu-
tion: 357-364. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Linnean Society
of London.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Solanum: 693-703. Academy of Sciences, USSR, Moscow.
FOURCADE, H.G. 1934. Contributions to the llora of the Knysna and
neighbouring divisions. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 2\ : 15-102.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
17
GBILE, Z.O. 1979. Solanum in Nigeria. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester &
A.D. Skelding, The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae:
113-120. Linnean Society of London.
GBILE, Z.O. 1986. Epidermal studies in the Solanum nigrum complex
in Nigeria. In W.G. D’ Arcy, Solanaceae'. biology and systemat-
ics: 159-168. Columbia University Press, New York.
GBILE, Z.O. & ADESINA, S.K. 1988. Nigerian Solanum species of
economic importance. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
75: 862-865.
GBILE, Z.O. & SOWUNML M.A. 1979, The pollen morphology of
Nigerian Solanum species. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D.
Skelding, The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae:
335-342. Linnean Society of London.
GENTRY, J.L. & STANDLEY, P.C. 1974. Flora of Guatemala, Solana-
ceae. Fieldiana, botany: 24.10: 1-151.
GOODING, E.G.B. 1965. Flora of Barbados 9\. Solanaceae: 373-382.
GROTH, D. 1989. Caracteriza5ao morfologica das sementes e plantu-
las de seis especies invasoras do genero Solanum L. Acta botanica
brasilica 3: 25^8.
HALL, J.B. & SWAINE, M.D. 1980. Seed stocks in Ghanaian forest
soils. Biotropica 12: 256-263.
HEINE, H.H. 1963. Solanaceae. In F.N. Hepper, Flora of West tropical
Africa, edn 2, 2: 325-335. Crown Agents, London.
HEINE, H.H. 1976. Solanacees. Flore de la Nouvelle-Caledonie et
Dependances 1: 119-205.
HEISER. C.B, 1971. Notes on some species of Solanum (sect. Lepto-
stemonum) in Latin America. Baileya 18: 59-65.
HEPPER, F.N. 1978. Typification and name changes of some Old World
Solanum species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 76:
287-292.
HEPPER, F.N. 1979. On typifying Linnaean names of Solanaceae. In
J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding. The biology and
taxonomy of the Solanaceae: 131-133. Linnean Society of
London.
HEPPER, F.N. & JAEGER, P.-M.L. 1986. A review of the genus Sola-
num in Africa. In W.G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae: biology and sys-
tematics: 41-55. Columbia University Press, New York.
HOSSAIN, M. 1973. Observations on stylar heteromorphism in
Solanum torvum Swartz (Solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 66: 291-301.
HUSAINI, S.W.H. & IWO, G.A. 1990. Cytomorphological studies in
some weedy species of the family Solanaceae from Jos plateau
in Nigeria. Feddes Repertorium 101 (1, 2): 41^7.
HUTCHINGS, A.. SCOTT, A.H., LEWIS, G. & CUNNINGHAM. A.B.
1996, Zulu medicinal plants, an inventory. University of Natal
Press, Pietermaritzburg.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON 1787a. Collectanea austriaca ad botanicum,
chemiam et historiam naturalem spectantia cum figuris 1.
Kraus, Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON 1787b. leones plantarum rariorum 1,5. Wappler,
Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON 1798. Plantarum rariorum horti caesarei
schoenbrunnensis descriptiones et icones 3. Vienna.
JAEGER. P.-M.L. 1985. Systematic studies in the genus Solanum in
Africa: 1-540. Ph.D. thesis. University of Birmingham. Un-
published.
JAEGER, P.-M.L. & HEPPER, F.N. 1986. A review of the genus
Solanum in Africa. In W.G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae: biology and
systematics: 41-55. Columbia University Press, New York.
JAIN, S.K. & BORTHAKUR, S.K. 1986. Solanaceae in Indian tradi-
tion, folklore and medicine. In W.G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae: biology
and systematics: 577-583. Columbia University Press, New
York.
KHAN, R. 1979. Solanum melongena and its ancestral forms. In J.G.
Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D, Skelding. The biology and taxon-
omy of the Solanaceae: 629-636. Linnean Society of London.
KNAPP, S. & JARVIS, C.E. 1990. The typification of the names of
New World Solanum species described by Linnaeus. Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 325-367.
LAMARCK. J.B.A.P.M. DE 1794. Tableau encyclopedique et metho-
dique des trois regnes de la nature. Botanique, suppl. 2. Paris.
LAMBERTYE, L. DE 1865. Solanum warsce'wiczii. Revue horticole: 429.
LEBRUN. J.P. & STORK, A.L. 1997. Enumeration des plantes a fleurs
dAfrique tropicale IV. Solanaceae: 386-400. Conservatoire et
Jardin Botaniques, Geneve.
LEMKE, D.E. 1991. The genus Solanum (Solanaceae) in Texas. Phy-
m/ogia 71: 362-378.
LESTER. R.N. 1978. The identity of S. viarum Dunal (S. khasianum
C.B. Clarke var. chatterjeeanum Sen Gupta). Solanaceae News-
letter 5: 5.6.
LEVEILLE, A.A.H. & VANIOT, E. 1908. Solanum cavaleriei. Bulletin
Societe Botanique de France 55: 207.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm.
LU, A. 1986. Solanaceae in China. In W.G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae: biology
and systematics: 79-85. Columbia University Press, New York.
MABBERLEY. D.J. 1997. The plant-book, a portable dictionary of the
vascular plants, edn 2. University Press, Cambridge.
MAITL PC.. MOOKHERJEA, S„ MATHEW, R., DAN, S.S. 1979.
Studies on Indian Solanum I. Alkaloid content and detection of
solasodine. Economic Botany 33: 15-11 .
MEHRA, K.L. 1979. Ethnobotany of Old World Solanaceae. In J.G.
Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding, The biology and taxon-
omy of the Solanaceae: 161-170. Linnean Society of London.
MILLER, R.H. 1969. A morphological study of Solanum mammosum
and its mammiform fruit. Botanical Gazette 130: 250-251 .
MORTON, C.V. 1976. A revision of the Argentine species o/ Solanum:
1-260, Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Cordoba, Argentina.
NEE. M. 1979. Patterns in biogeography in Solanum. section Acantho-
phora. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding. The biology
and tcLxonomy of the Solanaceae: 569-580. Linnean Society of
London.
NEE, M. 1986. Placentation patterns in the Solanaceae. In W.G. D'Arcy.
Solanaceae: biology and systematics: 169-175. Columbia Uni-
versity Press, New York.
NEE, M. 1991 . Synopsis of Solanum section Acanthophora: a group of in-
terest for glycoaUcaloids. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M. Nee & N.
Estrada, Solanaceae HI: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution: 257-266.
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Linnean Society of London.
NEE, M. 2001. Index to Solanum epithets. Unpublished electronic list.
NEES VON ESENBECK, C.G.D. 1837. Monograph of the East Indian
Solaneae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 17:
37-82.
OGUNDIPE, O.T. & DARAMOLA, S.O. 1997. Epidermal studies in
some species of Solanum L. (Solanaceae). Boletim da Socie-
dade Broteriana, ser. 2, 68: 5-33.
PEARCE, K. & LESTER. R.N. 1979. Chemotaxonomy of the cultivat-
ed eggplant — a new look at the taxonomic relationships of
Solanum melongena L. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D.
Skelding, The biology and ta.xonomy of the Solanaceae:
615-628. Linnean Society of London.
PEARSE, R.O. 1978. Mountain spleiuJour The wild flowers of the Drakens-
berg. Timmins. Cape Town.
PERSOON, C.H, 1805. Synopsis plantarum, seu enchiridium botani-
cum I: 228. Paris, Tubingen.
RANDELL. B.R. & S'YMON, D.E. 1976. Chromosome numbers in Austra-
lian Solanum species. Australian Jounuil of Botany 24: 369-379.
RAO, N.N. 1979. The barriers to hybridization between Solanum mel-
ongena and some other species of Solanum. In J.G. Hawkes,
R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding, The biology and ta.xonomy of the
Solanaceae: 605-614. Linnean Society of London.
RETIEF, E. & HERMAN. P.P.J, 1997. Plants of the northern provinces
of South Africa: keys and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6:
622-624.
RHIND, J. 1969. Weeds in South Africa. Farmer’s Weekly, July 16: 67.
RHIND, J. 1975. Weeds in South Africa. Fanner's Weekly, October 15:
133.
RODDICK, J.G. 1986. Steroidal alkaloids of the Solanaceae. In W.G.
D'Arcy. Solanaceae: biology and systematics: 201-222,
Columbia University Press, New York.
RODDICK, J.G. 1991. The importance of the Solanaceae in medicine
and drug therapy. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M. Nee & N.
Estrada, Solanaceae III: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution: 1-25.
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Linnean Society of London.
ROE, K.E. 1971 . Terminology of hairs in the genus Solanum. Ta.xon 20:
501-508.
ROE, K.E. 1979. Dispersal and speciation in Solanum, section Brevan-
therum. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding, The
biology and ta.xonorny of the Solanaceae: 563-568. Linnean
Society of London.
ROSS, J.H. 1972. The flora of Natal. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa No. 39: 308.
SAINT A.D. 1966. Alkaloidal content of Solanum khasianum Clarke.
Current Science 35: 600.
SCHLECH'l ENDAL, D EL. VON 1847. Solanum chrvsotrichum. Linnaea
19: 304.
SCHREIBER, K. 1979. Steroid alkaloids of Solanum. In J.G, Hawkes,
R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding, The biology and taxonomy of the
Solanaceae: 193-202. Linnean Society of London.
18
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
SEITHE, A. 1962. Die Haararten der Gattung Solanum L. und ihre tax-
onomische Verwertung. Botanische Jahrhiicher 81: 261- 336.
SEN GUPTA, G. 1961. A taxonomic note on Solanum khasianum
Clarke and description of a new variety under it. Bulletin of the
Botanical Survey of India 3: 413.
SHAW, J.M.H. 2000. Solanum. In J. Cullen et al.. The European garden
flora, vol. VI, Dicotyledons (part IV). Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
SWARTZ, O.P. 1788. Nova genera et species plantarum. Stockholm.
SYMON, D.E. 1979. Sex forms in Solanum (Solanaceae) and the role
of pollen collecting insects. In J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D.
Skelding, The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae: 385-
398. Linnean Society of London.
SYMON. D.E. 1981. A revision of the genus Solanum in Australia.
Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Garden 4: 1-367.
SYMON, D.E. 1982. Solanum. In R.W. Purdie, D.E. Symon & L. Haegi,
Flora of Australia 29, Solanaceae: 69-175.
SYMON, D.E. 1985. Solanaceae of New Guinea. Journal of the Adelaide
Botanic Garden 8: 1-171.
TROUPIN, G. 1985. Solanum (Solanaceae). Flore du Rwanda 3: 372-382.
VON SCHRANK, F. VON P. 1822. Solanum reflexum. Plantae rari-
ores horti academici monacensis 2: t. 81.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M.G. 1962. Medicinal and
poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa, edn 2. Living-
stone, Edinburgh & London.
WELLS, M.J., BALSINHAS, A.A., JOFFE, H., ENGELBRECHT, V.M.,
HARDING, G.G. & STIRTON, C.H. 1986. A catalogue of
problem plants in southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 53: 483^91.
WELMAN, W.G. 1993. Solanaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet,
Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 617-621.
WHALEN, M.D. 1984. Conspectus of species groups in Solanum sub-
genus Gentes Herbarum 12: 179-282.
WHALEN, M.D. & COSTICH, D.E. 1986. Andromonoecy in Sola-
num. In W.G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae: biology and systematics:
284-302. Columbia University Press, New York.
WfLDEMAN, E.A.J. DE 1907. Solanum pynaertii. Mission Emile Laurent
2. F. Vandenbuggenhoudt, Brussels.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1894. Solanaceae. Kew Bulletin: 127-129.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1904. Solanaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capen-
.sis 4,2: 87-121.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1906. Solanaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of tropi-
cal Africa 4,2: 207-261.
WUNDERLIN, R.P., HANSEN, B.F, DELANEY, K.R., NEE, M. &
MULLAHEY, J.J. 1993. Solanum viarum and S. tampicense
(Solanaceae): two weedy species new to Florida and the United
States. Sida 15: 605-611.
Bothalia 33.1: 19-39 (2003)
Studies in the genus Machairophyllum (Mesembryanthemaceae), with
notes on some related genera
H. KURZWEIL* and P. CHESSELET*
Keywords: Bijlia N.E.Br., Carruanthus (Schwantes) Schwantes. Cerochlamys N.E.Br., fynbos, Machairophyllum Schwantes, Mesembryanthe-
maceae, morphology. South Africa, taxonomy, ultrastructure. Western and Eastern Cape
ABSTRACT
Machairophyllum Schwantes is a small genus of the family Mesembryanthemaceae, confined to the southern part of
central South Africa from the Little Karoo at Barrydale in the west to the Zuurberg near Kirkwood in the east. Machairo-
phyllum is unusual in the Mesembryanthemaceae-Ruschioideae in that fynbos and renosterveld are the preferred habitats.
The morphology, anatomy as well as the pollen, seed and leaf epidermis ultrastructure of the genus were examined. The
taxonomy of Machairophyllum is revised on the basis of data presented. Of the ten names originally described, only four
are upheld. M. albidum (L.) Schwantes, M. stayneri L. Bolus, M. bijliae (N.E.Br.) L. Bolus and M. brevifolium L. Bolus. All
four species are very similar in their vegetative habit, and differ mainly in inflorescence and flower characters. Several
presumably related genera, Bijlia N.E.Br.. Carruanthus (Schwantes) Schwantes and Cerochlamys N.E.Br., are briefly dis-
cussed.
INTRODUCTION
Machairophyllum Schwantes is one of the few genera
of the succulent plant family Mesembryanthemaceae
which is almost exclusively found in fynbos or renoster-
veld. The species mostly prefer rocky habitats (Eigure
lA, B), although occasionally they grow among grass
and shrubs (Eigure 1C). In its distribution Machairo-
phyllum is, with two possible exceptions, entirely con-
fined to Western and Eastern Cape, South Africa (Eigure
2). Two localities have been reported in Northern Cape,
but are doubtful and need to be verified (see chapter on
phytogeography).
Plants of the genus Machairophyllum are unmistak-
able, with their clump-forming habit and the smooth
trigonous leaves. The leaves have a sabre-like appear-
ance, which is the origin of their botanical name
CMachaira\ Greek, means sabre, and "phyllon means
leaf). Plants are seldom found in flower as flowering is
stimulated by fire. Furthermore, flowers are mostly ves-
pertine or nocturnal. The striking, fairly large flowers
(Figure ID, E) are yellow and frequently orange-red on
the outside and on the petal tips.
Ten species have been described of which only four
are recognized in the present study, Machairophyllum
albidum (L.) Schwantes, M. bijliae (N.E.Br.) L. Bolus, M.
brevifolium L. Bolus and M. stayneri L. Bolus. M. albi-
dum is known from several sites in the Little Karoo and
is easily recognized by the branched inflorescences and
the normally long basal sheaths of the primary bracteoles
(‘bracts’). M. stayneri also has branched inflorescences,
and is known only from the type collection made on the
Zuurberg. M. bijliae is the most common and widespread
species. Vegetatively it looks identical to M. albidum, but
once flowers appear, the difference is obvious since the
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2002-04—15.
inflorescences are always unbranched and have mostly
short, basal, bracteole sheaths. M. brevifolium, as its
name suggests, has short and rather wide leaves. It is
known only from the red conglomerate hills between
Oudtshoom and De Rust.
Machairophyllum albidum and M. bijliae are fairly
abundant. In some cases the populations that were visit-
ed by the first author comprised hundreds of individuals.
It has been suggested to rate M. vanbredai L. Bolus as
‘Critically Endangered’ (Kurzweil & Linder-Smith 2001 ),
but we now consider this taxon synonymous with the
widespread M. bijliae. M. stayneri is only known from
the type collection, and the fact that the species was
never recollected may indicate that it is indeed very rare
or extinct. Populations of the two dwarf species from the
crumbling silcrete hills around De Rust (M. brevifolium
and the synonymous M. latifolium) appear to be declin-
ing in numbers due to the erosion of their habitat (Smith
etal. 1998; 220).
Machairophyllum is not very popular among succu-
lent growers because of the often large plant size and the
sporadic flowering. Plants are therefore rather uncom-
mon in cultivation although well-grown specimens may
be remarkably showy. M. albidum was introduced into
Europe in 1715, but is rather scarce now (Hammer 1991 ).
The plants can endure fairly low temperatures, and due
to their fynbos habitat they can tolerate considerably
more watering than many other mesembs (Kurzweil
pers. obs.). Propagation can take place through seeds or
cuttings (Jacobsen 1977). M. brevifolium is not uncom-
mon in collections in California and England, probably
because seeds were sent overseas by Mrs Van der Bijl, a
well known South African succulent collector (Hammer
1991: 77).
The objective of this study is to examine the character
distribution in Machairophyllum with the aim to resolve
the taxonomy of the genus. For the purpose of phyloge-
netic interpretation, the presumed relatives in Hartmann’s
20
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 1. — A-C. habitat. A, Macluiirophylluin alhiclum, Kiirzweil IH90. B, C, M. hijiicie: B, Kurzweil I896\ C, Kurzweil 1913. D, E, llowering
plants in previously burnt veld, photographed at around 17h00, Kurzweil 1902.
(1991 ) Bergerantim.s group, i.e. the minor genera Bijiia
N.E.Br., Carruanthu.s (Schwantes) Schwantes and Cero-
chUimys N.E.Br., which all .share smooth and dotless
leaves with Macluiirophylluiu. were briefly surveyed. Out
of these, Bijiia and Carruanthus were found to form a
very close-knit group with Macluiirophylluw, which is
here referred to as the "Macluiirophyllum complex’.
Taxonomic position and history
On account of having an inferior ovary with parietal
placentation and lophomorphic (crest-shaped) nectaries,
Macluiiropliylliwi is placed in Mesembryanthemaceae-
Ruschioideae (Herre 1971). The Ruschioideae is the
larger of the two subfamilies of Mesembryanthemaceae
with 107 genera mainly in .southern Africa. Ruschioideae
was classified into 12 tentative groups according to the
then state of knowledge (Hartmann 1991, 1993, 1998a).
Machaiwphylhim was listed in the Bergeranthiis group
which comprises perennial plants that mostly have free
leaves with homocellular xeromorphic epidermis, exsert-
ed inllorescences and flowers with separate lophomor-
phic nectaries. Distinguishing characters of the capsules
are the complete, firm and straight covering membranes
and the reduced valve wings. Closing bodies can be pre-
sent or absent. The genera included in this group are
Bergeranilius Schwantes, Bijiicp Carruanthus, Cerochla-
mys, Hereroa (Schwantes) Dinter & Schwantes, Rhomho-
phyllum (Schwantes) Schwantes and Machairophyllum.
Many members of the group also have semi-terete or
trigonous linear to lanceolate leaves. The genera includ-
ed in the Bergerauthus group share a similar distribution
in the southern and eastern parts of central South Africa.
Hereroa, however, has a wider distribution ranging into
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
21
HQOHT ABOVE SEA LEVS.
^ Over 1500 m
Fn 900 - 1500 m
m 300 - 900 m
I 1 Under 300 m
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of the
genus Machairophyllunr. M,
albidiim, O; M. bijiiae. •; M.
brevifolium. A; M. stayneri, O.
Doubtful records in Northern
Cape: O, fide Herre (1971:
198; near Vanrhynsdorp, no
comment on source of infor-
mation or identity of species
was made); ©. Viviers s.n.
(NBG, hort.; Richtersveld;
probably M. bijiiae).
the Free State, Northern Cape, Gauteng and Namibia.
Most genera of the Bergeranthiis group share a similar
pollination syndrome — with Cerochlamys as the only
exception, all have yellow flowers which are open in the
afternoon, evening or at night.
The genus Machairophyilum was described by Gustav
Schwantes in May 1927, based on M. albidiim and M.
cookii (here also included in the concept of M. albidiim)
which he had previously incorporated into the genus
Carniantluis. The species were said to differ from Car-
nianthiis mainly by having many stigmas. Schwantes
selected the former as the type species. Four years later
M. stenopetalum was described by Louisa Bolus { 1931 ),
followed by M. acuminatum and M. baxteri in 1935 (all
three are here included in M. bijiiae). M. brevifolium and
M. latifolium (here regarded as synonymous) were
described by L. Bolus in 1938. In the same year L. Bolus
also transferred Perissolobus bijlii to Machairophyilum.
The last two additions to the genus Machairophyilum
were M. stayneri (Bolus 1960) and M. vanbredai (Bolus
1964) (here included in M. bijiiae).
In 1960 L. Bolus published a brief review of Ma-
chairophyilum together with a key to the species; M.
bijiiae was not included as it was insufficiently known.
Later this key was used by Jacobsen (1977) in Lexicon of
succulent plants. In her review. Bolus (1960: 156) point-
ed out that most species were known only from their type
collections, and that ‘it is quite possible that, when more
intensive collecting and study have been done, M. bijiiae
(in spite of the much smaller size of the type, perhaps due
to adverse conditions), M. stenopetalum, M. acuminatum
and M. baxteri may prove to be forms of one variable
species’. This statement is very much in agreement with
the results of the present study. It is interesting that Bolus
doubts the validity of her own species (except for the
species that M. bijlii is based on, all were described by
herself). However, this did not prevent her from describ-
ing another species a few years later, namely M. van-
bredai in 1964, which is also merely a form of this ‘vari-
able species’ (M. bijiiae).
The species that Machairophyilum bijiiae is based on
was first described in a monotypic genus Perissolobus
(Brown 1931 ). According to Brown, the main reasons for
the recognition of Perissolobus were its eight sepals;
affinities to Machairophyilum were not mentioned in his
paper. Bolus (1938) pointed out the striking similarity of
the two genera and transferred Perissolobus bijlii to
Machairophyilum. She regarded the eight sepals of the
species as being ‘but a further variation of the already
variable calyx of Machairophyilum' (Bolus 1938: 135).
Bolus (1950: 229) pointed out that the reason for there
not being any reference to Machairophyilum in Brown’s
paper was probably the fact that at the time Machairo-
phyllum was erroneously thought to occur in Namaqua-
land in Northern Cape, whereas Perissolobus bijlii was
described from Eastern Cape.
A synopsis of Machairophyilum was presented by
Hartmann (2001). Both species with five or six sepals
and ± double the number of locules were considered con-
specific, namely M. albidiim and M. cookii. Also M. bijii-
ae and M. vanbredai on the one hand as well as M. bre-
vifolium and M. latifolium on the other hand were united
as they were considered to differ only in minor charac-
ters. Thus the number of species was reduced to seven. It
was also pointed out that a study of the genus may show
that only four or five species are distinguishable, namely
M. albidiim, M. bijiiae, M. brevifolium, M. stayneri and,
possibly, a new species, allegedly from the Richtersveld.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Dry and liquid-preserved material of Machairo-
phyilum, as well as live seeds, were collected in the field
in South Africa. For comparative purposes, material of
Bijlia, Carriianthus and Cerochlamys was also collected.
Herbarium material on loan from the Bolus Herbarium of
the University of Cape Town (BOL) and the Herbarium,
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London (K) was examined.
Additional material was obtained from the Compton
Herbarium of the National Botanical Institute, Cape Town
(NBG) and from living plants cultivated in the National
Botanical Garden, Kirstenbosch.
22
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Herbarium, live and liquid-preserved material was
used for gross-morphological investigations. The scan-
ning electron microscope (SEM) technique had to be
employed for the study of fine details. With this tech-
nique the examination of seeds, pollen and epidermal
surfaces was done without previous treatment of sam-
ples. SEM investigations of floral structures as well as
anatomical studies required the previous fixation of the
material in FAA (ethanol 70% : glacial acetic acid : for-
maldehyde = 18 : 1 : 1). Material was treated with FAA
for a few days and later stored in ethanol 70%. For SEM
studies it was dissected in ethanol. Subsequently, sam-
ples were chemically dehydrated in formaldehyde-
dimethylacetal and critical-point-dried directly from this
reagent without the use of an intermedium, using CO2 as
the earner gas (technique after Gerstberger & Leins 1978).
Samples were sputter-coated with AuPd and viewed and
photographed with a CAMBRIDGE STEREOSCAN
S200 scanning electron microscope at voltages ranging
from 10 to 30 kV. Anatomical studies were undertaken
using a standard dehydration and wax embedding tech-
nique; samples were stained with alcian blue and
safranin.
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS (SEE TABLE 1)
Growth forms
Machairophylhim species are vegetatively fairly uni-
form. The plants are compact, glabrous succulents with
short stem internodes and trigonous leaves (Figure
lA-C). Old plants may form mats of up to 1.2 m in
diameter. Even in large clumps the side branches nor-
mally do not form adventitious roots and are thus not
anchored to the ground. Superficially, plants of
Machairophylhim may be mistaken for Carpobrotus,
which also occurs in fynbos, although these have some-
what longer and greener leaves and have well-developed
stem internodes; however, the flowers and the fruit struc-
ture of Carpobrotus are very different.
Leaf
Morphology
The leaves are opposite with members of a pair ±
equal and basally connate to form a sheath 10-15 mm
long; in early ontogenetic stages leaves of a pair are often
weakly unequal (anisophylly). The lamina is linear to
lanceolate, entire, trigonous in the central portion but
basally semi-terete because the dorsal (abaxial) keel dis-
appears; the apex is acute to acuminate. Leaves are pale
green often with a whitish tinge, or frequently flushed
with red in sun-exposed specimens. Old leaves die off
and turn black, but persist on the plant for a long time.
Near the base, just above the union of a pair, an obscure
swelling is visible on the upper side, which stretches as a
curved structure over the entire width of the leaf. It
marks the point up to which the leaf is tightly adpressed
to the following leaf pair. However, this swelling is not
developed as a prominent pustule, which is found in
many other mesembs (Hartmann 1991).
Plants growing wild have leaves 10- ± 145 x 8-26 mm.
The variation in length and width is continuous and does
not allow a clear-cut separation of taxa (Figure 3).
Whereas M. brevifoliitm always has short leaves, a few
specimens referable to M. bijliae also have very short
leaves, namely Van der Bijl 93 (the type), Desmet 2158,
Pocock NBG627/26 and Kurzweil 1919. Particularly long
leaves are found in M. albidum. It appears that leaf length
and width are mainly the result of environmental factors
and are not genetically fixed. The leaf size was previously
considered a major key character (Bolus 1960).
Leaf surface
The leaf surface belongs to the ‘xeromorphic type’
defined by equal or nearly equal epidermis cells, a
strongly thickened outer cell wall and a prominent wax
cover (Ihlenfeldt & Hartmann 1982) (Figure 4); epider-
mis cells are irregularly polygonal-isodiametric to elon-
TABLE 1. — Important features of the Machairophyllwn species recognized
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
23
25
23 *
19 *
£ °
£ 17 0
^'5 °
♦ ^
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
leaf length (mm)
FIGURE 3. — Diagram showing relationship of leaf length and width in
Machairophyllum. M. albidiim, □; M. stayneri, O; M. bijliae,
♦; M. brevifolium, A. Plotted measurements represent average
values found in examined specimens.
gate, ± 61-146 x 30-85 jam; anticlinal walls are straight;
stomata are superficial to slightly sunken (Figure 4F), on
both sides of the leaf, paracytic (seusii Dupont 1976),
39.32 X 22.00 pm.
Leaves lack teeth, dots or hairs, are covered by a con-
tinuous wax layer, which is either smooth or breaks up
into platelets (Figure 4A-F). Local wax projections
mainly take the shape of elongate rodlets (Figure
4B-D), but round granules or flakes are also found
occasionally (Figure 4B). In Kurzweil 1914 structures
resembling burst bubbles were observed next to a stoma
(Figure 4F), but nothing can be said about their nature at
this stage.
Anatomy
Leaves are mostly well differentiated into peripheral
assimilation tissue and central water storage tissue
(Figure 5 A), which are parenchymatic and have intercel-
lular spaces. Tannin idioblasts, a common feature in
xeromorphic Mesembryanthemaceae (Hartmann 1991),
as well as raphide idioblasts occur throughout the meso-
phyll, but are absent in the epidermis and hypodermis.
Epidermis is homocellular, cells with flat outer peri-
clinal walls without papillae; cuticle 1 to 2 pm thick;
outer wall is strongly thickened at 5-25 pm and contains
crystal sand made up of minute grains of calcium oxalate
as in other xeromorphic Mesembryanthemaceae (Ihlen-
feldt & Hartmann 1982; asterisk in Figure 6A); inner
periclinal walls and the anticlinal walls are 1-3 pm thick;
hypodermis cells are elongate or more rarely isodiamet-
ric, walls 1-3 pm thick.
Assimilation tissue is compact, 10-15-seriate (Figure
6B); vascular bundles as well as fibre bundles are absent;
a ring of small vascular bundles is present at the bound-
ary of assimilation tissue and water storage tissue,
referred to as secondary bundles (Dannemann 1883;
arrowhead in Figure 6C). The central water storage tissue
is 10-30-seriate, contains laxly arranged cells; large
water storage cells are scattered throughout. Primary
bundles: 1-3, are large with several smaller collateral
vascular bundles (Figure 6D); the main bundle is nor-
mally broad, straight or slightly curved. Most of the pri-
FIGURE 4. — SEM micrographs of
leaf surfaces in Machairo-
phylliim: A. E, M. cilhiduin:
B, M. cf. hijliae', C, D, M.
bijiiae', F, M. sp. A. Kurzweil
1900: B, Bayer 7027: C,
Kurzweil 1901: D, Kurzweil
1896: E. Kurzweil 1902: F,
Kurzweil 1914. Scale bars:
20 pm.
24
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 5. — Semi-diagrammatic representation of the anatomy of leaf
and stem in Machairophyllunr. A, M. alhidiim. Kurzweil 1890,
leaf, B-D. M. hijiiac. Kurzweil /9/9: B, primary stem; C. D,
enlarged sections of B. A, assimilation tissue; C, cortex; COLL,
collenchyma; E, epidermis; H. hypodcrmis; R phloem; PB. pri-
mary bundle; PI, pith; SB, secondary bundle; VC, vascular
cylinder; W, central water storage tissue; X, xylem. Seale bars:
A, 5 mm; B, 20 mm; C, D. 0.1 mm. Drawn by P. Chesselet,
mary bundles have collenchymatic caps, and bundles
plus their caps are surrounded by parenchymatic sheaths.
Stem
The anatomy of the stem conforms essentially to that of
other Mesembryanthemaceae with similar compact growth
(Hartmann 1976, 1977; Hartmann & Golling 1993).
Epidermis and cortex are only visible as separate
structures in the primary stem (Figure 5B, D). The epi-
dermis is similar to that of the leaf, and the hypodermis is
insignificant. The massive parenchymatic cortex proba-
bly acts as a storage organ. In older stems the cortex is
successively replaced by a layered cork which originates
in its inner part. In several specimens a layer of small and
compactly arranged collenchymatic cells is found just
outside the vascular cylinder (Figure 5B, C), reminiscent
of a similar collenchymatic ring in Odontophonis
(Hartmann 1976) and Fenestraha (Hartmann 1982). The
vascular tissue of the primary stem consists of a ring of
collateral bundles, and takes the shape of a rounded rec-
tangle with its long axis parallel to the axis of the first
leaf. Feaf traces emerge in rapid succession from the
shorter sides of the rectangle. Each pair emerges at an
angle of 90° to the previous one, and the shape of the vas-
cular cylinder therefore changes according to this pattern.
Secondary growth starts in the second internode. It is
anomalous as in other Mesembryanthemaceae (Metcalfe
& Chalk 1950) in that numerous secondary bundles are
developed by new cambium formed on the outside of the
primary vascular cylinder (epifascicular cambium).
These eventually form several concentric rings around
the primary vascular cylinder (Figure 7A, B). An unusu-
al cell pattern was observed in the pith of several speci-
mens of MachaiwphyUiim bijiiae (Figure 7C), looking
like pith cells with minute rounded ‘cells’ between them.
It is possible that the latter are in fact intercellular spaces.
Root
Roots are mostly thin and slender, up to 2 mm in
diameter. Anatomically the roots resemble stems. They
also show an anomalous secondary growth (Metcalfe &
Chalk 1950). Roots are usually diarch (2-stranded) or
triarch (3-stranded). Prominent collenchyma caps are
found on the phloem of the bundles. In some specimens,
strongly thickened sclereid cells are found below the
xylem and form pronounced sclerenchyma caps.
Inflorescence and pedicel
In principle the inflorescence of Machairophylliim is a
dichasium (Figure 8A) which is typical of Mesem-
bryanthemaceae (Hartmann 1993). The number of flowers
ranges from three to ± seven. Frequently one of the side
branches is aborted, which is probably the result of envi-
ronmental factors, or may be caused by disease, or insect
attack. In a large number of specimens the flowering shoot
is consistently unbranched and has a single flower (Figure
8B), and lateral buds or vestiges thereof were not found.
This is obviously the result of a reduction which is also
found in some other mesembs and may be part of their life
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
25
FIGURE 6. — Leaf anatomy in
Machairophylhim in t/s. A,
M. a I bid urn, Kurzweil 1902,
epidermis. Asterisk indicates
crystal sand in outer epider-
mis wall. B, D. M. bijliae,
NBG806/83: B, assimilation
tissue; D, central vascular
bundle, note the dark col-
lenchyma caps. C, M. sp.,
NBG44/83: secondary vascu-
lar bundles, indicated by ar-
rowheads. Scale bars: A, D,
50 pm; B, C, 100 pm.
Strategy, aimed at a synchronization of the flowering in
order to improve the probabihty of successful pollination
(Ihlenfeldt 1989: 80). It was found that the degree of
branching is remarkably constant in Machairophylhim. In
the present study the inflorescence type is considered a
character of major taxonomic importance, with the
branched inflorescence characterizing M. albidum and M.
stayneri, and the unbranched inflorescence characterizing
M bijliae and M. brevifoliiim. This corresponds exactly
with the concepts of Bolus (1960: 157) and J. Vlok (pers.
FIGURE 7. — Secondary stem in
Machairophylhim bijliae in
t/s, Kurzweil 1919. A, B, vas-
cular bundles; C, pith. PB,
primary bundles; SB, sec-
ondary bundles. Scale bars:
50 pm.
26
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
FIGURE 9. — Length of bracteole sheath in Machairophylliim albidum,
□ ; and M. bijiiae, ♦. Average measurements were used for cal-
culation.
fruit stage, 3-6 mm thick and are smooth on the outside
or have pronounced ribs. Anatomically they are rather
uniform, consisting of an epidermis with a crystal sand
layer, a weakly-defined hypodermis, a massive cortex
followed by the vascular cylinder and a parenchymatic
pith (Figure lOA, B). The vascular cylinder is a closed
ring with inner xylem elements, multi-layered cambium
and an outer phloem. All specimens examined have a
closed collenchymatic ring on the outside of the phloem.
Fibre bundles in the cortex occur occasionally.
FIGURE 8. — Semi-diagrammatic representation of inflorescences in
Machairophyllum. A. M. albidum. Kurzweil 1900\ dichasium;
B. M. bijiiae. Kurzweil 1919; solitary flower. Scale bars: 10
mm. Drawn by R Chesselet.
comm.). In the vast majority of cases the distinction of
specimens with branched versus unbranched inflorescences
is clear-cut but, rarely, poorly grown specimens of M.
albidum were found to be single-flowered (however, they
normally reveal their affinity to M. albidum in floral char-
acters).
In all cases the flowers are subtended by an opposite
pair of short bracteoles which resemble foliage leaves
[These bracteoles have also been referred to as ‘bracts’,
and it needs to be noted that their homology is disputed.
However, the term ‘bracteoles’ was used in the most recent
treatment of the genus (Hartmann 2001), and is therefore
adopted here]. Bracteoles are 7-130 mm long, with their
free upper portion ranging from 6-60 mm; bases are con-
nate and form a sheath. The length of this sheath is strong-
ly intercorrelated with the degree of inflorescence branch-
ing: M. bijiiae and M. brevifolium, the two species with
unbranched inflorescences, have predominantly basal
bracteole sheaths of up to 25 mm long (total range 5-42
mm) whereas M. albidum, with branched inflorescences,
has predominantly primary bracteole sheaths which are
longer than 21 mm (ranging from 15 to almost 100 mm)
(Figure 9). The single specimen of M. stayneri (branched
inflorescence) has primary bracteole sheaths of 15 mm.
The term ‘primary’ is here used for the terminal flower
of the dichasium, i.e. here applying to the basal-most
bracteoles. M. albidum and M. stayneri have ‘secondary’
bracteoles below the flowers of the side branches.
Flowers are generally stalked in Machairophyllum.
The pedicel is up to 85 mm long in solitary flowers and
in terminal flowers of branched inflorescences, is usual-
ly shorter on side branches, sometimes elongate in the
Flower
Flowers are actinomorphic and bisexual, up to 65 mm
in diameter, with few sepals, numerous petals and sta-
mens, and up to 12 stigmas; filamentous staminodes are
absent. In M. albidum and M. bijiiae the number of sepa-
ls and locules is subject to slight variation (see also Bolus
1950: 229), and different numbers may even be found in
different flowers on the same plant. In contrast, in M.
brevifolium the number is constantly six. Pollination
studies were not earned out, but from a functional-mor-
phological point of view the flowers can be referred to
the ‘Phalaenophilous’ type (Hartmann 1991: 91). A
moth-pollination syndrome is suggested by the yellow
flowers with a pale centre which are open in the after-
noon, evening or at night.
Sepals five to eight, unequal, (Figure 11 A) succulent
and weakly keeled, with white, membranous margins,
apically acute, acuminate or rarely somewhat obtuse, fre-
quently with subapical mucro on the dorsal side; total
length + 3-22 mm. Sepals of M. albidum tend to be
wider than those of the other species, but a comparative
analysis of the sizes does not allow a grouping within the
genus (Figure 1 IB).
Petals develop as staminodes from the androecial pri-
mordium as in other Mesembryanthemaceae-Ruschioi-
deae (Hartmann 1993); are arranged in three to seven
series; are ligulate or linear-lanceolate with acute or
more often obtuse apex; up to 35 x ± 0.3-2 mm; are yel-
low or golden yellow and often have reddish, copper-
coloured or orange-coloured outsides and tips and paler
bases; petal sizes as well as the ratio of the lengths of
petals and sepals are largely continuous (Figure 1 1C, D).
Stamens remain erect during anthesis and form a cone;
their bases are epapillate or only the inner ones are obscure-
BothaIia33,l (2003)
27
FIGURE 10. — Anatomy of flower
stalk in MachairophxUum in
t/s. A, M. albidum, Kurzweil
1902. epidermis; B, M. bijliae,
Kurzweil 1925. close-up of
vascular cylinder. Scale bars:
50 pm.
ly papillate; are 5-19 mm long and generally longer in the
larger-flowered M. albidum than in M. bijliae.
Nectaries are meronectaries of the lophomorphic type
(Rappa 1912; Hartmann 1991), green. They appear as
five to twelve ± prominently raised portions of a ring at
the inner base of the stamens opposed to the locules
(Figure 12A-C). The number of nectaries is normally
identical with the number of carpels/locules. Numerous
modified stomata can be seen and are frequently partly
blocked (Figure 12F). Crystals were occasionally also
observed on these nectaries, both in transections and
SEM micrographs (Figure 12E). Their chemical nature is
not known, but they are probably not simply made up of
solidified nectar, as it is difficult to imagine that crystal-
lized nectar would not have dissolved during the chemi-
cal preparation for SEM or wax embedding. In a few
specimens there are also structures that resemble minute
craters surrounded by a pronounced circular ridge (Figure
12D). In the past, the nectaries of Machairophyllitm have
been misinterpreted, as they have been termed distant,
approximate or contiguous (Herre 1971) which is proba-
bly mainly the result of their different extent of formation.
The syncarpous ovary is epigynous and is made up of
five to twelve carpels which terminate in slender, free stig-
mas that nearly reach the height of the stamens. Each ovary
chamber contains many ovules on parietal placentae. M.
albidum has predominantly ten to twelve stigmas, whereas
most specimens of M. bijliae and the type of M. stayneri
have six to eight stigmas (erroneously 7 or 8 were cited in
the description of the species). The two specimens of M.
brevifolium examined here exhibit six stigmas (Figure 13).
Unlike many other Mesembryanthemaceae, the flow-
ers of MachairophyUum are afternoon-active, vespertine
or nocturnal and remain closed during the day.
Fruit
Obconic, 7-15 mm in diameter when closed, loculici-
dal, hygrochastic capsules as in most other Mesem-
bryanthemaceae-Ruschioideae (Hartmann 1991, 1993);
their base is funnel-shaped and the top strongly raised in
the centre; sutures are prominent and the high valve rims
are normally reflexed (Figure 14A). Fully expanded cap-
sules usually have the valves at right angles to the floral
axis. The capsules do not clearly fall into any of the mor-
phological fruit types distinguished by Hartmann (1988:
349) and the genus was therefore listed as a ‘genus of
uncertain position’. Chesselet et al. (2000) referred to the
capsule as ‘similar to that of Cylindwphyllum and therefore
perhaps close to the Leipoldtia type’, but with spongy tis-
sue in the covering membranes and small closing bodies.
Within the genus MachairophyUum the internal struc-
ture of the capsule is not uniform (Figure 14B-D).
Capsules normally have 5-12 locules with the numbers
6-10 being the most common. A larger locule number of
14 or 15 was reported by Salm Dyck (1849), but this
could not be confirmed. As pointed out before, the num-
ber of locules is often not stable in MachairophyUum.
Valves are broadly to narrowly triangular, depending on
the locule number, 3. 0-6. 6 mm long, basal width 3. 5-6.0
mm, shortly and narrowly winged with the exception of
M. brevifoliimp wings taper apically with their ends
drawn out into slender tips which are connate with the
awns of the expanding keels; expanding keels ± parallel
at the base and close to each other and diverge to some
degree in their distal part, serrate or lacerate on their
inner margin, though sometimes minutely so, tips are
slender awns, l-2(-3) mm long which nearly reach the
tip of the valves. These awns are generally cohering and
frequently cross each other. In M. brevifolium the awns
are shorter or hardly developed. Covering membranes
petal length (mm) ^ petal width (mm) 03 sepal width (mm) ^ number of specimens
28
Bothalia33,l (2003)
♦
♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦
□
♦ 0 4
□ alhicliim
o siayneri
♦ hijliae
A hrevifolium
sepal length (mm)
□ albiJum
o siayneri
♦ hijllae
A hrevifoluini
[K'tal length (mm)
30
25
20
15
10
D
□ alhichim
o siayneri
♦ hijliae
A hrevifolium
8 10 12 14 16 18 20
FIGURE 11. — Diagrams showing
sepal and petal characters in
Machairophylliwi. Plotted
measurements in B-D repre-
sent average values found in
examined flowers. A, num-
ber of sepals; B, relationship
of sepal length and width; C,
relationship of petal length
and width; D, relationship of
sepal length and petal length.
D
sc|):d length (mm)
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
29
FIGURE 12. — SEM micrographs of nectaries in Machairophyllum. A-E. M. alhidiinr. A. receptacle with sepals, petals, stamens and stigmas
removed, showing ring of nectar glands; B. C. individual nectar gland; D. crater-like structures on surface of nectar gland; E. crystals. F. M.
bijiiae. modified stomata on nectary. A-C. Kiirzweil 1900', D. E. Kurzweil 1902'. F. Kurzweil 1919. Scale bars: A. B. 1 mm; C-E. 20 pm.
are concave in M. albiclum (Figure 14B), whereas in M.
hijliae and M. hrevifoliiim (Figure 14C. D) they are roof-
like in shape, ± translucent and rather stiff in texture. In
the latter species, they do not cover the locules entirely
and are somewhat short. In fact, M. brevifoliwn is quite
distinct from other Machairophyllum species in its fruit
morphology: the expanding keels are thick, without awns
or wings, closing bodies are reduced to tiny knobs and
the fruit is consistently six-locular. In the other species,
closing bodies are small and frequently deep-set. Their
shape varies from rotund to kidney-shaped. In one speci-
men they were found to be slightly two-lobed (Kurzweil
1919). Although fruit morphology has been considered
number of stigmas
FIGURE 13. — Diagram showing number of stigmas in Machairo-
phyllum.
30
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 14, — Capsules in Machairopliyllimr. A, closed; B-D, open. A, B, M. ulbidimi, Kiirzweil 1900', C, M. bijiiae, Kiirzweil 1919', D, M. bre-
vifoliitm. Kiirzweil 1904. Drawn by R Chesselet.
as the most important complex of characters for the
delimitation of genera in the Mesembryanthemaceae,
this does not seem to be the case in the current interpre-
tation of the genus Machairophyllum.
Seeds
The micromorphology of 29 specimens was examined
in the present study. Seeds are pear-shaped with a pro-
truding micropyle which conforms with the seeds of
other Mesembryanthemaceae (Figure 1 3 A) (Hartmann &
Gbiling 1993), 0.87(0.73-1 .00) x 0.64(0.44-0.77) mm,
dark brown to light yellowish brown. In the central seed
portion the testa ceils are predominantly elongate with a
strongly convex periclinai wall and have iiregulariy
undulating anticlinal walls (Figure 15B-E); neighbour-
ing cells almost touch each other. Very rarely, the anticli-
nal depressions between the cobblestone-like convex
testa cells are rather wide. The outer periclinai wall is
normally smooth to slightly verrucose. In Desmet 2158
most of the periclinai surface is smooth but the marginal
areas are rough (Figure 15D). The periclinai walls of the
testa exhibit epicuticular formations of various density
and shape. Epicuticular formations mostly consist of
minute, loosely or densely arranged rodlets (Eigure
15E-G), but flake-like epicuticular formations also occur
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
31
FIGURE 15. — SEM micrographs of
seed moiphology in Machairo-
phyllum. The close-up micro-
graphs in B-G were taken in
the central seed portion. A,
seed; B-G, testa cells. A, B,
M. cf. hijliae, Bayer 7027:
C-G, M. hijliae. C. Kurzweil
1898: D, Desmet 2158: E, F,
Kurzweil 1916: G, Kurzweil
1925. Scale bars: A, 100 pm;
B-F, 10 pm, G, 5 pm.
(e.g. Desmet 2158; Kurzweil 1901) (Figure 15D). The
occurrence of spinulose rodlets was reported in Me-
sembryanthemoideae and a few genera of Ruschioideae
(Bittrich 1986; Ehler & Barthlott 1978). A crystal of
unknown nature and function was found on the testa just
above an anticlinal wall (Figure 15F).
Pollen
Pollen was examined in 33 air-dried specimens and
proved to be uniform (Figure 16). Pollen grains are tri-
colpate which is the common condition in the family
(Dupont 1977), equiaxial to strongly longiaxial, average
equatorial diameter 14.80 pm; average of the polar dis-
tance 15.36 pm. The comparatively small size observed
(compare with e.g. Dupont 1977 and Chesselet et al.
1998) is probably the result of hydration state. The sur-
face of the pollen grains is microspinulose as in the
majority of Mesembryanthemaceae (Hartmann 1991),
and the size and density of spinules is subject to slight
variation in the genus. Irregular perforations through the
tectum are visible in all specimens (Figure 16C). In M.
brevifolium (Lategan 2367/36) these are rather prominent
and the pollen is thus approaching a reticulate condition.
Phytogeography and ecology
All confirmed collections of Mochairophyllum come
from the southern parts of central South Africa (Western and
Eastern Cape) the only area that the genus is known from
with certainty (Eigure 2). The distribution range is in the
Little Karoo from Barrydale eastwards and in the adjacent
mountain ranges of the Swaitberg in the north and the
Langeberg in the south, and stretches further to Oudtshoom,
Uniondale, the Baviaanskloof and Kouga Mountains and to
Salt Pans Nek (near Jansenville); it is also known from the
Zuurberg (near Kirkwood north of Port Elizabeth) which is
the easternmost occurrence of the genus. Unfortunately many
of the older herbarium collections indicate only the district
where they were found and their exact locality is therefore
unknown. Populations aie rather localized within the distri-
bution range, but in some areas this may be the result of the
lack of suitable habitats or of low collecting activity.
Specimens referred to MachairophyUiim were also collected
in Port Elizabeth, near Mossel Bay, in De Hoop Nature
Reserve near Bredasdorp and near Laingsburg, but these
were later correctly identified as belonging to different gen-
era. In addition, there is also a record from the Richtersveld
of Northern Cape but this isolated occurrence needs confir-
mation (Figure 2). This spectacular collection was made near
Lekkersing about 10 years ago (Viviers s.n., NBG, hort.) —
some 600 km from the well-known distribution area of the
genus and also in an area where the prefemed habitat of
Machairophyllum is scarce. No plants were later found
despite an extensive search in the area (E. van Jaarsveld pers.
comm.). The unbranched inflorescences, the short bracteole
sheaths, as well as the number of sepals and locules suggest
that the plant belongs to M. hijliae. Another locality in
Northern Cape, situated in the Vanrhynsdorp District, was
shown on the distribution map of Machairophyllum present-
ed in Herre (1971 : 198) but no comment on the origin of the
information was made (Figure 2). However, the occurrence
of Machairophyllum in Northern Cape would not be too sur-
prising, as up to the 1930s ‘Little Namaqualand’ was thought
to be the distribution area of M. alhidum (see below).
32
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Machairophyllum albidiim occurs in the western part
of the distribution area of the genus, ranging from
Barrydale to around Oudtshoorn. An outlying locality is
known near Klaarstroom in the eastern Swartberg. The
widespread M. bijliae is known from the George and
Oudtshoorn Divisions eastwards to the Zuurberg. The
distribution areas of these two species overlap in the
Oudtshoorn District. M. brevifoUiim has so far only been
recorded in the red conglomerate hills between
Oudtshoorn and De Rust, and M. stayneri is only known
from the Zuurberg.
In the past there was considerable confusion around
the distribution of Machairophyllum. Linnaeus (1762),
when describing Mesembryanthemiim albidum (now
Machairophyllum albidum) gave its locality as ‘Habitat
in Aethiopia’ which merely implied that the plants came
from Africa. Sonder (1894), in his account in Flora
capeusis, quoted Namaqualand as the distribution area of
the sole Machairophyllum species known at the time, M.
albidum (as Mesembryanthemiim albidum). Sonder cited
two collections, one made by A. Wyley and the other by
Drege. The former collection was examined by Mrs L.
Bolus who provisionally referred it to the genus
Cheiridopsis (Bolus 1960: 156 [in the footnote]). The
latter could not be traced in the present study, and there-
fore it cannot be ruled out entirely that it is indeed a
species of Machairophyllum. Several subsequent authors
quoted the distribution ‘Namaqualand’ for M. albidum or
the entire genus Machairophyllum (e.g. Berger 1908;
Jacobsen 1935). However, both Berger and Jacobsen
probably merely adopted the distribution given by
Sonder. All subsequent collections of Machairophyllum
were only made in the southern part of central South
Africa, and therefore the occurrence of Machairophyllum
in Northern Cape was increasingly doubted (Schwantes
1957; 93).
Machairophyllum albidum and M. bijliae are most
commonly found on rocky outcrops (Figure lA, B), on
bare rock on N-exposed slopes and on rocky ridges in
mesic to dry fynbos or in renosterveld, commonly also
FIGURE 16. — SEM micrographs of
pollen morphology and sur-
face ornamentation in Ma-
chairophyllum bijliae. A, B,
pollen grains; C, surface
ornamentation. A, Foiircade
NBG424/24- B. Holland
NBGI697/36-, C, Ba.xter
NBG3J66/14. Scale bars: A,
B. 10 pm; C, 1 pm.
where fynbos and renosterveld meet. On one herbarium
collection a fynbos-valley bushveld mix is also given.
The occurrence of Machairophyllum in comparatively
moist fynbos is rather atypical in the family, as most
Mesembryanthemaceae are found in arid or semi-arid
areas in southern Africa, although this unusual habitat is
also that of a few other genera (e.g. Erepsia, Carpobro-
tus). The few accurate collector’s notes available indicate
that the species grow in rocky soil and bedrock derived
from TMS. The plants rarely occupy grassy habitats
amongst rocks over deeper soils (mainly in Eastern
Cape) and are then nearly hidden in tall vegetation
(Figure 1C). No accurate ecological information is given
on the type sheet of M. stayneri, but the area where the
species was collected generally falls in the Savanna
Biome (Rutherford & Westfall 1994) although fynbos
and renosterveld occur at higher altitudes in this area. M.
brevifoUiim is only known from the red conglomerate
hills near Oudtshoorn where it grows in fields of pebbles
interspersed with small shrubs.
Altitudes for the genus range from 330 m in the Little
Karoo to just below 1 600 m in the Swartberg. M.
albidum is usually found at low altitudes ranging from
330 to 600 m. M. bijliae is very much a high-altitude
species, with almost all collections made between 800 m
and 1 560 m (top of Swartberg Pass). The only exception
is a collection of this species made at 570 m near Jouber-
tina (Fourcade 2384\ BOL). The type locality of M. bre-
vifoliuni is between 550 and 600 m.
Flowering in Machairophyllum albidum and M. bijli-
ae is often stimulated by burning of the habitat, which
has been observed during the present study and has also
been reported before (J. Vlok pers. comm.; notes on a
herbarium sheet of M. albidum, Blackburn s.n.,
BOL63638). The fact that veld fires have a profound
effect on the flowering of plants in the Cape Floristic
Region is well documented in other families (e.g. Ama-
ryllidaceae, Iridaceae, Orchidaceae), but is not known in
Mesembryanthemaceae. However, other effects of veld
fires on mesembs have been reported (e.g. the rapid
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
33
spreading of Erepsia species in response to burning:
Liede 1989, 1990; Hartmann 2001 ). Plants of Maclmiro-
phyUiim are normally not seriously damaged by veld
fires. Most plants grow in rocky sites where the fire
intensity is low. Dense clump formation ensures that
only the outer leaves are singed during the burning and
most adult individuals therefore survive the fire.
Furthermore, the seeds of the previous season are well
protected by the comparatively hard and robust capsules,
and plenty of seed is therefore available in the post-fire
environment. Flowering in M. brevifoliiim is apparently
not stimulated by burning.
Phytogeny
Machaiwphylhim in its current delimitation is fairly
uniform in vegetative, floral and several capsule features
which seems to suggest that it is indeed a natural group.
At present, the genus can be diagnosed according to the
following characters: clump-foiTning habit without visi-
ble stems; smooth and dotless and often waxen leaves of
a green or whitish green colour; large yellow flowers
which are open in the afternoon, evening or at night;
absence of filamentous staminodes; long filiform stig-
mas; capsules with raised sutures and reflexed valve
rims; covering membranes present; closing bodies small;
expanding keels serrate or lacerate and apically ± awned.
However, in a strict sense the morphological and ana-
tomical data obtained here are considered insufficient as
a basis for a sound phylogenetic analysis, as a definite
synapomorphy for the genus cannot be identified at this
stage. We therefore suggest that further data be obtained
for the entire Bergeranthus group, including molecular
ones, to resolve the phylogeny of Machairophyllitm.
While M. alhidum and M. bijliae are fairly similar in
details of the internal capsule structure (valve wings pre-
sent; covering membranes complete; high and variable
number of locules), M. brevifoliiim deviates somewhat
(valve wings absent; covering membranes incomplete;
low and stable number of locules) thus leaving doubt
regarding its systematic position. Nevertheless, until new
data become available, MachairopliyUiim is retained in
its current delimitation for practical reasons despite the
distinctness of M. brevifoliiim and we consider it prema-
ture to require that genera in the mesembs be defined on
the basis of synapomorphies.
TAXONOMY
Machairophyllum Schwaiites in Mollers Deutsche
Gartner-Zeitung 42: 187 (1927); Bolus: 155-158 (1960)
(synopsis). Type species: Machairophyllum alhidum (L.)
Schwantes.
Perissolobus N.E.Br: 278 (1930); N.E.Br.: 294 (1931).
Type species: Perissolobus bijlii N.E.Br.
Nearly stemless and tuft-like perennial herbs, entire-
ly glabrous, basally branched with age, sometimes form-
ing mats of up to 1.2 m diam. Leaves succulent and
trigonous, decussate, simple and entire, sessile, estipu-
late, crowded, linear-lanceolate (‘sabre-shaped’, ‘dag-
ger-shaped’) or rarely subrhomboid, 10-145 x 8-26 mm
and up to V4 as deep, base of a leaf pair connate to form
a sheath 5-18 mm long, leaf apex acute or acuminate;
surface smooth and dotless, waxen in appearance,
whitish green to green, often with a reddish tinge; old
leaves persisting on plant for several years and turning
black; stomata superficial to slightly sunken, outer epi-
dermal wall with well-developed crystal sand layer, epi-
cuticular wax mostly in the form of a solid and smooth
layer, rarely breaking up into platelets, local wax pro-
jections mainly in form of rodlets, rarely granules or
flakes. Inflorescences unbranched with a solitary flower
or dichasially branched with up to seven flowers, rarely
monochasial due to loss of one side branch, bracteolate;
bracteoles leaf-like, 7-130 x ± 5-10 mm, bases connate
for (5-)10-70(-100) mm. Flowers actinomorphic and
bisexual, large, showy, up to 65 mm diam., open in
afternoon, evening or at night, on 12-100 mm long
pedicels; pedicels sometimes elongating in fruit. Sepals
5-8, triangular-lanceolate, green with purplish tinge,
with whitish membranous margins, (3-)8-18(-22) x
(3-)4-16 mm, unequal, acute, acuminate or rarely
obtuse, outside often apically keeled and mucronate.
Petals (petaloid staminodes) numerous, densely 3-7-
seriate, linear or lorate, (8-) 15-35 x 0. 3-2.0 mm. obtuse
or acute, yellow or golden and frequently orange-red or
copper-coloured on outside and near tip, often paler near
base. Filamentous staminodes absent. Stamens erect,
forming a cone; filaments epapillate or only inner ones
inconspicuously papillate at base. (5-)7-15(-19) mm
long, whitish; anthers dehiscing with longitudinal slits,
anther and pollen yellow. Ovary usually obconic, syn-
carpous, 5-12(-15?)-carpellate, placentation parietal,
with many ovules per chamber. Nectar glands 5-12,
apparent as ± raised portions on a ring. Stigmas
(5)6-12(-15?), slender or filiform, usually slightly
shorter than stamens, (4-)8-15(-16) mm long. Fruit a
hygrochastic loculicidal capsule, 5-12(-15?) locular,
base funnel-shaped with slightly concave sides, sutures
on top strongly compressed, valve rims high and usual-
ly reflexed, valves mostly shortly and narrowly winged,
wings basally broader and tapering into fine awns dis-
tally, which are connate with awns of expanding keels,
expanding keels at first parallel and close to each other,
but diverging above, serrate or lacerate and mostly ter-
minating in slender awns which are directed towards
median axis of valve (often crossing each other), nearly
as long as valves, loculi with complete or almost com-
plete translucent to whitish covering membranes, clos-
ing bodies small and frequently deeply set, no addition-
al closing devices present. Seeds ± pyriform, ±
(0.7-)0. 8-1.0 mm long. Flowering occurs from spring
to early summer.
Key to species
la Inflorescence branched; bracteole sheatb mostly longer than
25 mm:
2a Sepals 5 or 6; stigmas 8-12; widespread 1 . M. albidum
2b Sepals and stigmas 6-8; only Zuurberg 2. M. stayneri
lb Inflorescence unbranched; bracteole sheatb mostly shorter
than 25 mm:
3a Leaves (20-)32-70(-85) x 8-15(-18) mm; sepals 5-8;
stigmas 5-10; widespread 3. M. bijliae
3b Leaves 10-30 x 10-26 mm; sepals and stigmas 6; current-
ly only known in red conglomerate hills to east of
Oudtshoorn 4. M. brevifoliiim
34
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
1. Machairophyllum albidum {L.) Schwantes in
Mollers Deutsche Gartner- Zeitung 42: 187 (1927). Me-
seiiibiyanthemiim albidum L: 699 (1762). Bergeranthus
albidiis (L.) Schwantes: 180 (1926). Carriiandius albi-
diis (L.) Schwantes: 181 (1926) nom. inval. Iconotype:
Dilleniiis, Hortus Elthamensis: 243, t. 189, fig. 232 (1732).
Mesembryanthemum cookii L. Bolus: 2 (1925). Bergeranthus cookii
(L. Bolus) Schwantes: 180 (1926). Carruanthus cookii (L. Bolus)
Schwantes: 181 (1926) nom. inval. Machairophyllum cookii (L. Bolus)
Schwantes: 187 (1927). Type: Western Cape, 3320DC, Barrydale and
15 miles west, October, Compton & Cook NBG 1995/23 (BOL, holo.!).
Compact, tufted and nearly stemless, succulent herb,
entirely glabrous, basally branched with age. Leaves
trigonous, linear-lanceolate, entire, sessile, 40-145 x
9-20 mm and up to V4 as deep, apically acute to acumi-
nate, connate sheath 7-17 mm long, surface smooth and
waxen in appearance, whitish green or green. Inflo-
rescence branched, up to 170 mm tall, with 2-7 flowers;
bracteoles leaf-like, (25-)50-130 x 5-8 mm, with a con-
nate sheath (17-)42-80(-100) mm long. Flowers large
and showy, 45-65 mm diam., vespertine, nocturnal or
open from 15h00 onwards and often closing again in the
evening; pedicels up to 100 mm long. Sepals 5 or 6, tri-
angular-lanceolate, 6-20 X 5-16 mm, unequal, green
with a purplish tinge, with whitish membranous margins,
apically ± acute. Petals ± 400, linear or lorate, 18-35 x
(0.3-)0.6-1.0(-1.5) mm, inside yellow, frequently orange-
red or copper-coloured on outside and near tip. Stamens
numerous, erect and forming cone, 10-15(-19) mm
long; filaments white; anthers yellow. Ovary obconic,
(8-)10-12(-15?)-carpellate, placentation parietal, with
many ovules per chamber. Nectar glands as ± raised por-
tions on whitish ring, (8-)10-l2, green. Stigmas
(8-)10-12(-15?), slender, 8-15(-16) mm long. Fruit a
loculicidal capsule 12-15 mm diam., base funnel-
shaped, sutures on top compressed, valve rims high and
diverging; with (8-)10-12(-15?) locules, valves 4. 0-5. 6
X 3. 2-3. 5 mm in size, narrowly winged; covering mem-
branes complete; closing bodies small; expanding keels
lacerate, parallel and adjacent at base, but soon diverg-
ing, apically awned. Flowering time: mainly November
and December.
Distribution, habitat and biology
The species is mainly known in the Little Karoo from
Barrydale to the George and Oudtshoorn Divisions
which is the western part of the distribution area of the
genus. On Cloetespas near Herbertsdale, the species
extends over the coastal mountain range. M. albidum has
also been collected near Klaarstroom in the eastern part
of the Swartberg {Burger BOL38796, BOL) which is an
outlying occurrence of the species (Ligure 2). M.
albidum grows in fynbos and renosterveld, mostly asso-
ciated with rocky habitats, from 330-600 m.
Similar species
Vegetatively Machairophyllum bijliae is largely iden-
tical to M. albidum which also occurs in the same type of
habitat although M. bijliae frequently has shorter leaves.
In the flowering stage the difference is immediately
obvious, as M. bijliae consistently has solitary flowers.
whereas inflorescences of M. albidum are branched. On
average M. bijliae has also slightly smaller flowers with
shorter petals. M. bijliae differs further by mostly having
shorter bracteole sheaths, a higher number of sepals, and
ovaries with fewer locules. While the centre of distribu-
tion of M. bijliae is further east, the distribution areas of
the two species overlap in the Oudtshoorn area. M. bijliae
is always found above 800 m, whereas M. albidum is
generally a low-altitude species.
Vouchers: Compton & Cook NBG1995/23 (BOL); Hall BOL32083
(BOL); Kurzweil 1890. 1900 (NBG); Muir 3937 (K).
2. Machairophyllum stayneri L.Bolus in Journal
of South African Botany 26: 155 (1960). Type: Eastern
Cape, 3325BC, summit of Zuurberg Pass, October 1958,
Stayner KG 196/59 (BOL, holo.!).
Densely compact, nearly stemless, entirely glabrous,
basally branched with age, sometimes forming mats up
to 1.2 m diam. Leaves trigonous, entire, linear-lanceo-
late, 70-80(-100?) X 13-16 mm and up to V4 as deep,
apex acute or acuminate, basal sheath 10-15 mm long;
surface smooth and waxen. Inflorescence branched, up to
150 mm tall, lateral buds develop ‘tardily’ (fide Bolus
1960); bracteoles up to 52 mm long, basally connate for
± 15 mm (fide Bolus 1960). Flowers nocturnal, 50-62
mm diam.; pedicels up to 33 mm. Sepals 6-8, long-
acuminate, 14—20 X 5-8 mm. Petals in 5 or 6 series, 17-27
X 0. 5-1.0 mm, yellow to golden and orange to pink on
outside, basally paler. Stamens 13-17 mm. Nectar glands
6-8. Stigmas 6-8, thick-filiform, 12-14 mm long. Fruit a
loculicidal capsule with 6-8 locules. Flowering time:
October.
Distribution, habitat and biology
The species is known only from the type collection
which was made on the Zuurberg in the Eastern Cape
(Ligure 2). No ecological information was given on the
type sheet.
Note
The only collection of this species, consisting of a
complete plant and several loose fragments, was made
over forty years ago. Despite an extensive search by the
first author, no plants could be located. The number of
sepals and locules associated with short bracteole sheaths
and branched inflorescences suggest that the species is
distinct. The branched inflorescence seems to point to a
close relationship with Machairophyllum albidum.
Alternatively, the short bracteole sheaths as well as floral
characters may indicate affinities to M. bijliae.
If the species is recollected, future studies based on
more material may well suggest that Machairophyllum
stayneri is merely a form of one of the other species. It
must be noted that all characters except the branched
inllorescence are well within the range of variation of M.
bijliae which also shares a similar distribution. Thus it
cannot be ruled out entirely that the specimen in question
is an abnormal plant of M. bijliae.
Vouctier: .Stayner KG 196/59 (BOL).
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
35
3. Machairophyllum bijiiae (N.E.Br.) L.Bolus,
Notes on Mesembryanlhemum and allied genera 3: 135
( 1938), as bijUi. Perissolobiis bijiiae N.E.Br: 294 (1931),
as bijlii. Type: Eastern Cape, Somerset East Div., no
date. Van der BijI 93 (K, holo.-NBG, photo!).
Machairophyllum stenopetalum L.Bolus: 303 ( 1931 1. Type: Eastern
Cape, near Willowmore, August 1931, Brauns SUG8030 (BOL, holo.!).
M. acuminatum L.Bolus: 485 (1935). Type: Eastern Cape, near
Humansdorp, October 1934, Fourcade NBG424/24 (BOL, holo.!).
M. baxteri L.Bolus: 486 (1935). Type: Western Cape, near George.
October 1934, Baxter NBG3 1 66/1 4 (BOL, holo.!).
M. vanbredai L.Bolus: 238 (1964). Type: Eastern Cape. 3325BC,
Witwater Farm, Somerset East Div., August 1962. Van Breda 1749/62
(BOL. holo.!).
Plants compact, nearly stemless, entirely glabrous,
basally branched with age. Leaves trigonous, linear-lance-
olate, entire, (20-)32-70(-88) x 8-15(-20) mm and up to
V4 as deep, connate for (5-)8-13(-18) mm, apex acute or
acuminate; surface smooth, waxen in appearance, whitish
green to green, often with reddish tinge. Inflorescence
unbranched; bracteoles leaf-like, ( 18-)25-40(-60) x
5-8(-10) mm, connate for 7-18(-42) mm. Flowers soli-
tary, 30-55 mm diam.; pedicels ( 13.5-)30.0-70.0(-100.0)
mm and up to 38 mm diam., elongating up to 130 mm in
fruit; flowers mainly nocturnal (opening late afternoon or
evening and staying open all night). Sepals (5)6-8,
unequal, leaf-like, triangular-lanceolate, (3-)8-22 x
3-8(-ll) mm, apex acute, acuminate or rarely obtuse,
green with purplish tinge, with whitish membranous mar-
gins. Petals numerous, linear to lorate. (8-)15-25(-28) x
0.3-1. 0(-2.0) mm, yellow, outsides often orange-yellow
to copper-coloured, base pale yellow. Stamens erect, form-
ing cone, (5-)7-14(-15) mm long; filaments without sig-
nificant papillae, white; anthers yellow. Ovary obconic,
(5)6-8(-10)-carpellate. with many ovules per chamber.
Nectar glands as (5)6-8(-10) ± raised portions on ring,
green. Stigmas (5)6-8(-10), filiform, (4— )7-14 mm long.
Fruit a loculicidal capsule, up to 13 mm diam., up to 24
mm when expanded, base funnel-shaped, sutures on top
compressed, valve rims high and diverging, capsule with
(5)6-8(-10) locules, valves 4.0-5. 3 x 3. 8-5. 8 mm with
narrow wings with terminal awns; expanding keels serrate
to lacerate, parallel and adjacent at base, but soon diverg-
ing, with terminal awns; covering membranes complete,
translucent to whitish; closing bodies small. Seeds brown,
± 1 mm long. Flowering time: mainly between August and
November.
Distribution, habitat and biology
This is the most widespread Machairophyllum species.
It is known from many collections which were made in a
broad band from the Oudtshoom Division, the Swartberg
Mountains, the Willowmore District, the Baviaanskloof
and Kouga Mountains and Jansenville to the Zuurberg
near Kirkwood in Eastern Cape (Figure 2). M. bijiiae
grows in fynbos and renosterveld, mostly associated with
rocky habitats. Most collections were made at altitudes
of between 800 and 1 300 m, but one collection has been
made near Joubertina at 570 m (Fourcade 2384; BOL).
The highest record comes from near the top of Swartberg
Pass at 1 560 m.
Similar species
Machairophyllum bijiiae vegetatively resembles M.
albidum. Differences are given under this species.
Note
The original spelling "bijlii'' is a mistake in gender
because the species was named after Mrs D. van der Bijl.
Vouchers: Baxter 3166/14 (BOL); Desmet 2158 (NBG); Tavlor
NBG1556/33 (BOL); Van Breda 1761/61 (BOL).
4. Machairophyllum brevifolium L.Bolus, Notes
on Mesembryanthemum and allied genera 3: 126 ( 1938).
Type: Western Cape, 3322CB, near Oudtshoom, August-
September 1937, Lategan NBG2369/36 (BOL, holo.!).
Machairophyllum latifolium L.Bolus: 126 (1938). Type: Western
Cape, near Oudtshoom. February 1938 (hort?). Lategan NBG2367/36
(BOL. holo.!).
Plants nearly stemless, compact, sometimes forming
mats with age, entirely glabrous. Leaves trigonous,
lanceolate or subrhomboid, entire, 10-30 x 10-26 mm,
12-15 mm deep, apically acute, connate for ± 8-10 mm;
surface smooth, waxen in appearance, whitish green to
green. Inflorescences unbranched; bracteoles 7-23 mm
long, connate for ±5-10 mm. Flowers solitary on a pedi-
cel 12-15 mm long, open in the afternoon or vespertine,
30^5 mm diam. Sepals 6, unequal, broadly triangular-
lanceolate, 8-14 X 4-8 mm. Petals numerous, lorate, 3 or
4-seriate, 13-20 x 1-2 mm, yellow. Stamens 9-10 mm
long; filaments without conspicuous papillae at base;
anther and pollen yellow. Ovary 6-carpellate, with many
ovules per chamber. Nectar glands 6. Stigmas 6, filiform,
10-12 mm long. Fruit a loculicidal capsule with 6
locules, base funnel-shaped, sutures on top compressed,
valve rims diverging; valves ±3x4 mm. without wings;
expanding keels lacerate, basally parallel and adjacent to
each other but soon diverging, acute, but without awns;
loculi largely covered by translucent covering mem-
branes; closing bodies very small. Seeds brown, ± 1 mm
long. Flowering time: August and September.
Distribution, habitat and biology
The species is known from only three collections made
at or near the type localities of Machairophyllum brevi-
folium and the conspecific M. latifolium in the red con-
glomerate hills between Oudtshoom and De Rust (Figure
2). In the population which was visited by the first author
(at the Farm ‘Skuinspad’) ± 50 plants grew among small
pebbles in rather open shrub vegetation next to the edge
of a cliff. The type locality of M. brevifolium is at ±
500-600 m altitude. A few collections of this species
were also made elsewhere, but their identity is doubtful.
Note
Bolus (1938: 126) pointed out the striking resem-
blance of this species to the genus Faiicaria, referring to
it as a possible ‘connecting link’. This does not necessar-
ily imply a close affinity in a phylogenetical sense al-
though a relationship of the two genera would not be
36
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
very unlikely (J. Vlok pers. comm.). Machaiwphyllum
and Faiicaria were not considered as being related in the
preliminary grouping presented by Hartmann (1991).
However, in the new classification of Chesselet et ah
(2002) they are grouped together in the Delospermeae.
Vouchers: Lategan NBG2367/36. NBG2369/36 (BOL).
Unknown species
Three names, ^ Machairophyllum minor L.B’ (‘L.B.’
probably stands for L. Bolus; Nel SUG8313; BOL), ‘M.
minus' (Tiigwell & Levenson NBG2634/14\ BOL) and M.
imiondalensis (Hammer 1991), could not be traced and
have never been validly described.
NOTES ON SOME PRESUMABLY RELATED GENERA (TABLE 2)
Bijlia and Carnianthus
Bijlia N.E.Br is a genus of two species known from
around the Great Karoo town of Prince Albert and from
kloofs on the northern slope of the Swartberg to the west
of it. A detailed explanation of the complicated nomen-
clature of the then sole species B. dilatata H.E.K. Hart-
mann was presented by Hartmann (1992). A second spe-
cies, B. tiigwelliae (L.Bolus) S. A. Hammer was added later
(Hammer 1995). The genus Carriiandms (Schwantes)
Schwantes, from the Karoo near Willowmore, comprises
two species, C. ringens (L.) Boom and C. peersii L.Bolus.
The latter species was placed in the monotypic genus
Tischleria Schwantes on account of having a slightly dif-
ferent capsule structure, but is now also included in
Carruanthus (Herre 1971; Dyer 1975; Smith et al. 1998;
Chesselet et al. 2000; Hartmann 2001).
Plants of Bijlia and Carruanthus are compact and
glabrous herbs like Machairophyllum, and have trigo-
nous leaves. In their morphology, the leaves of Carru-
anthus are similar to those of Machairophyllum but dif-
fer by having prominent teeth on the margins. Anatomi-
cally the leaves of Bijlia and Carruanthus are very simi-
lar to those of Machairophyllum. Their surface has a
solid wax cover which breaks up to form platelets
(Eigure 17A, B). Local wax projections in the form of
rodlets, granules or flakes (common in Machairo-
phyllum) appear to be scarce in Bijlia and Carruanthus.
Elowers of Bijlia and Carruanthus are solitary or are
arranged in few-flowered cymes, the short peduncles
usually hidden among the leaves. Pedicels of Bijlia are
up to 10 mm long and those of Carruanthus up to 100
mm long. Both genera have five subequal to unequal
sepals, linear-lanceolate petals and numerous stamens.
Eilamentous staminodes are absent. In Bijlia tiigwelliae
the nectaries are visible as raised portions of a ring
(Figure 17D-F) which is also the situation in Machairo-
phyllum. Capsules of Bijlia and Carruanthus are five-
locular, and have strongly raised sutures. In Carruanthus
these have reflexed valve rims which is shared with
Machairophyllum. In contrast, the rims are erect and
straight in Bijlia. While the capsule opens up, in Bijlia
the valves separate only slightly from each other, where-
TABLE 2. — Various features in the genera Machairophyllum, Carruanthus, Bijlia and Cerochlamys
Bothalia33,l (2003)
37
as they are fully or largely spreading in Carmanthus.
Valve wings are absent in Bijlia but are developed as
short and narrow flaps in Carnicmthiis. The covering
membranes are complete in Bijlia and Carnianthiis t in-
gens but are only developed as a small limb in C. peer-
sii. Closing bodies are large, white bulges in Bijlia but
are small or absent in Carmanthus. The general shape of
the seeds of Bijlia and Carmanthus does not differ
markedly from that of Machairophyllum. Seeds are
ovoid to pear-shaped and ± 0.6-0. 9 mm long. In both
Bijlia species the testa cells are extended into papillae
(Figure 17G). and have epicuticular formations in the
form of granules. Seeds of Carmanthus are very similar
to those of Machairophyllum in that they have elongate
and strongly convex testa cells with coarsely undulate
anticlinal walls (Figure 17H). Epicuticular formations in
Carmanthus are also very similar and mainly take the
shape of rodlets.
Concluding remarks: a similar leaf shape and anato-
my, elongate-pedicelled flowers, capsules with raised
sutures with reflexed valve rims and short and narrow
valve wings, as well as a strikingly similar seed ultra-
structure mark clear affinities of the genera Carmanthus
FIGURE 17. — SEM micrographs of
various features in Bijlia.
Carmanthus and Cerochla-
niys. A-C, leaf surface: A,
Bijlia tugwelliae, Kurzweil
1927: B, Carmanthus peer-
sii: C, Cerochkunys pachy-
phylla. D-F. nectaries of
Bijlia tugwelliae, NBG702/86.
G-I, seed surface: G, Bijlia
dilatata. NBG526/6H: H, Car-
ruanthus peersii: I. Cerochla-
mvs pachyphylla. B. H, Kurz-
weil 1926: C. I, Kurzweil
1905. Scale bars: A-C, F-I,
20pm;D, E, 500 pm.
and Machairophyllum and suggest that the two are sister
groups. The small size or absence of closing bodies in
both Carmanthus species and the lack of a complete
covering membrane in one (C. peersii) is probably the
result of reduction.
Cerochlamys
Cerochlarnys N.E.Br comprises three species in the
Swellendam, Oudtshoorn and Laingsburg Districts in
Western Cape. A fourth species was recognized by
Hartmann ( 1998b) but was referred to the genus Acrodon
N.E.Br (Burgoyne 1998). The following brief comments
refer to the actual examination of C. pachyphylla
(L. Bolus) L. Bolus, while information on the other species
was largely obtained from the literature (mainly Hart-
mann 1998b).
All three species are compact and nearly stemless
succulents with smooth, clavate or trigonous leaves. The
leaf surface of Cerochlamys pachyphylla and C. gemina
(L. Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann has a solid wax cover which
breaks up to form platelets (Figure 17C) which also
occurs in C. trigona N.E.Br (Hartmann 1998b). In C. pachy-
38
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
phylla {Kurzweil 1905) the main leaf vascular bundles
was found to be strongly curved or concentric with col-
lenchymatic sheaths.
The short-pedicelled flowers of Cerochlamys are soli-
tary or arranged in few-flowered cymes. Flowers are
pink, purple or white, and are open during the day.
Cerochlamys has mostly five subequal to unequal sepals
(except six in C. gemina), linear-lanceolate petals and
numerous erect stamens in a cone. All species have white
filamentous staminodes. Nectaries were reported as sep-
arate (Herre 1971) and as ‘... very broad, touching each
other, sometimes apparently in a ring’ (Hartmann 1998b:
53). The stigmas of the three species are comparatively
short. Capsules are five-locular in C. pachyphylla and C.
trigona, but six-locular in C. gemina. In C. pachyphylla
the sutures on top of the capsule are strongly raised, and
have straight valve rims. Valves are erect in the opened
position and lack wings. The roof-shaped covering
membranes are complete. Expanding keels are diverging
and terminate in long awns. Closing bodies are absent in
Cerochlamys although the placenta ends are often knob-
shaped (Hartmann 1998b). Seeds are ovoid to pear-
shaped and ± 0.6-0. 9 mm long. The isodiametric to elon-
gate testa cells are extended into papillae (Figure 171).
Concluding remarks: floral and fruit characters of
Cerochlamys, particularly, the filamentous staminodes,
the short stigmas, its flowering phenology with diurnal
pink, purple or white flowers are very unusual in the
Bergerantlnis group suggesting that the genus may not
be correctly placed here. While resolving the correct
taxonomic position of Cerochlamys is obviously beyond
the scope of the present paper, the genus is here not con-
sidered as part of the Machairophylliim complex.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Herbarium abbreviations in accordance with the latest
version of Index Herbariorum, BOL* = Pickle collection
at BOL; NBG = National Botanic Garden Kirstenbosch,
SUG = Stellenbosch University Garden.
Acocks 15999 (3) BOL.
Baxter NBG3166/14 (3) BOL. Bean 1091 (3) BOL. Blackburn 2,
BOL63638 (1 ) BOL. Brauns SUG8030 (3) BOL. Burger BOL38796 ( I )
BOL.
Cilliers SUG10742 ( 3) BOL. Clarke NBG930/20 (3) BOL.
Compton & Cook NBG1995/23 (1 ) BOL.
Desmet 2076, 2147, 2158 (3) NBG.
Esterhuysen 16231, 24894 (3) BOL.
Fourcade 2384, NBG424/24 (3) BOL.
Hall BOL25194. BOL32083. NBG477/53, NBG522/52 (1) BOL;
NBG223/68 (1) NBG; Herre SUG12178 (3) BOL. Holland
NBG 1697/36 (3) BOL.
Kurzmdl 1890, 1900, /902 (1) BOL*, NBG; 1896, 1898, 1899, 1901,
1913, 1916, 1918, 1925 (3) BOL*; 1919 (3) BOL*, NBG; 1904 (4) BOL*.
Lategun NBG2367/36, NBG2369/36 (4) BOL.
Murkoelier SUG 10661 (3) BOL. Muir 3937 ( I ) K.
Nel SUG8313 (3) BOL.
Peers BOL32084 (3) BOL. Pillans 915, NBG496/I6 (1) BOL.
Pocock NBG627/26 (3) BOL, S. 246 = NBG661/28 (3) BOL.
Stayner KG196/59 (2) BOL; NBG177/88 (3) hort. ‘student’
SUG1004\ (3) BOL.
Taylor BOL32085, BOL63637, NBG1556/33 (3) BOL; NBG858/30
(I) BOL. Tugwell & Levenson NBG2634/14 (3) BOL.
Van Breda 1196, 1749/62, 1761/61 (3) BOL. Van Jaarsveld 07082
= NBG 769/83 (3) NBG; 07264 = NBG 806/83 (3) hort. Van der Bijl
NBG1465/33 (1) BOL. Viviers s.n. (3) hort.
Wisura 2159 (3) NBG. Without collector: 467b, SUG82 74 (3)
BOL;St/G S9S4(l)BOL,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Most of all we would like to express our thanks to Mr
Jan Vlok (Oudtshoom) for sharing his invaluable experi-
ence and for providing input into the manuscript. The
collecting work was made possible by the Western Cape
Nature Conservation Board and the Department of
Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism of the
Province of the Eastern Cape who issued the necessary
collecting permits. The first author would also like to
thank Dr R.J. Chinnock and Mr Deon Viljoen for their
assistance during the collecting work. Herbarium mater-
ial was obtained on loan from BOL and K, and thanks are
also due to the staff of the herbaria PRE, SBT and UPS
for sending photocopies/photographs of specimens.
Useful advice was also provided by Prof. Dr H.-D.
Ihlenfeldt and Dr H.E.K. Hartmann (both Germany). We
are also grateful to Ernst van Jaarsveld (Kirstenbosch,
Cape Town) for help in many ways. Bruce Bayer, Phillip
Desmet, Colin Patterson-Jones and Mike Viviers are
thanked for providing additional specimens. We are also
indebted to the staff of the Electron Microscope Unit at
the University of Cape Town for providing SEM time.
The study was carried out at the National Botanical
Institute, and we thank the curators of the Compton
Herbarium and the National Botanical Garden, Kirsten-
bosch for the use of their collections.
RELERENCES
BERGER, A. 1908. Mesembryanthemen und Portulacaceen. Ulmer,
Stuttgart.
BITTRICH, V. 1986. Untersuchungen zu Merkmalsbestand, Gliederung
und Abgrenzung der Unterfamilie Mesembryanthemoideae
(Mesembryanthemaceae Lenzl). Mitteilungen aiis dem Institut
fur Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 21: 5-1 16.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1925. Novitates Africanae. Annals of the Bolus
Herbarium 4: 1-30.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1931. Notes on Mesembryantlienium and allied gen-
era, part 2: 303. University of Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1935. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 2: 485^87. University of Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1938. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 126. 127, 135. University of Cape Town,
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1950. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 228, 229. University of Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1960. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 26: 155-164.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1964. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 30: 231-243.
BROWN, N.E. 1930. Mesembryanthemum and some new genera sepa-
rated from it. Gardeners’ Chronicle 88, ser. 3: 278.
BROWN, N.E. 1931. Mesembryanthemum and some new genera sepa-
rated from it. Gardeners’ Chronicle 89, ser. 3: 294, 295.
BURGOYNE, R 1998. Rinding a place in the sun: where does Ruschia
purpureostyla belong? Aloe 35: 60, 61,
CHESSELET, P., HARTMANN, H.E.K., HAHN, N., BURGOYNE, P.
& SMITH, G.L. 1998. Taxonomic notes on the genus Khadia
(Mesembryanthemaceae/Aizoaceae). Bothalia 28: 25-33.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
39
CHESSELET, R, SMITH, G.F., BURGOYNE, P.M., KLAK. C„
HAMMER, S.A., HARTMANN, H.E.K., KURZWEIL, H„
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., VAN WYK, B.-E. & LEISTNER,
O.A. 2000. Mesembryanthemaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10:
360-410. National Botanical Institute. Pretoria.
CHESSELET, P, SMITH. G.F. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2001. A new trib-
al classification of the Mesembryanthemaceae Eenzl based on
characters of the floral nectary. Aloe 38: 25-28.
CHESSELET. P. SMITH. G.F. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2002. A new trib-
al classification of the Mesembryanthemaceae: evidence from
floral nectaries. Taxon 51: 295-308.
DANNEMANN, J.F. 1883. Beitrdge zur Kenntniss der Anatomie imd Ent-
wickhing der Mesembryanthema. Ph.D. thesis. University of Halle.
DILLENIUS. J.J. 1732. Hortus Eltiumiensis: 243. London.
DUPONT, S. 1976. Nouvelles observations surdes stomates de Mesem-
bryanthemacees. Actes dii 97‘ congres National des Societes.
Savantes Nantes, section des sciences, tome IV: 371-390.
DUPONT. S. 1977. Notes on the pollen of the Mesembryanthemaceae.
Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 39: 57-63.
DYER. R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants.
vol. 1 (Dicotyledones). Department of Agriculture, Pretoria,
EHLER. N. & BARTHLOTT, W. 1978. Die epicutikulare Skulptur der
Testa-ZeUwiinde einiger Mesembryanthemaceae. Botanische Jahr-
biicher 99: 329-340.
GERSTBERGER, P. & LEINS, P. 1978. Rasterelektronenmikroskopische
Untersuchungen an Bliitenknospen von Physalis philadelphica
(Solanaceae). Anwendung einer neuen Praparationsmethode.
Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 91: 381-387.
HAMMER. S.A. 1991. Friendly daggers, or notes on Machairo-
phyllum. Mesemb Study Group Bulletin 4: 77, 78.
HAMMER. S. 1995. Mastering the art of growing mesembs. Cactus
and Succulent Journal (US) 61: 195-247.
HARTMANN. H.E.K. 1976. Monographic der Gattung Odontophorus
N.E.Br, (Mesembryanthemaceae Eenzl) (Monographic der sub-
tribus Leipoldtiinae Schw. I). Botanische Jahrbucher 91: 161-225,
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1977. Monographic der Gattung Argyroderma
N.E.Br. (Mesembryanthemaceae Eenzl). Mitteilungen aus clem
Instinct fiir Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 15: 121-235.
HARTMANN. H.E.K. 1982. Monographien der Subtribus Leipoldtiinae.
III. Monographic der Gattung Fenestraria (Mesembryan-
themaceae). Botanische Jahrbiicher 103: 145-183.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1988. Fruit types in Mesembryanthema.
Beitrdge zur Biologic der Pflanzen 63: 313-349.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1991. Mesembryanthema. Contributions from the
Bolus Herbarium 13: 75-157.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1992. A new name for Bijlia cana (Mesembry-
anthema). Cactus and Succulent Journal ( US) 64: 173-180.
HARTMANN. H.E.K. 1993. Aizoaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J.G. Rohwer
& V. Bittrich, The families and genera of vascular plants, vol.
2: 37-69. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998a. A letter to the MSG. Mesemb Study
Group Bulletin 2: 32-34.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998b. New combinations in Ruschioideae,
based on studies in Ruschia (Aizoaceae). Bradleya 16: 44—91.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. (ed.) 2001. Illustrated handbook of succulent
plants: Aizoaceae (in 2 parts). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidel-
berg, New York.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. & GOLLING, H. 1993. A monograph of the
genus Glottiphyllum (Me.sembryanthema, Aizoaceae). Bradleya
11: 1-49.
HERRE, H. 1971. The genera of the Mesembryanthemaceae. Tafel-
berg. Cape Town and Johannesburg.
IHLENFELDT. H.-D. 1989. Life strategies of succulent desert plants.
Excelsa 14: 75-83.
IHLENFELDT. H.-D. & HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1982. Leaf surfaces in
Mesembryanthemaceae. In D.F. Cutler, F.L. Alvin & C.E. Price,
The plant cuticle: 397M^23. Academic Press, London.
JACOBSEN, H. 1935. Succulent plants — description, cultivation and
uses of succulent plants, other than cacti. Williams & Norgate,
London.
JACOBSEN. H. 1977. Lexicon of succulent plants, edn. 2 [revised and
enlarged edition]. Blandford Press, Poole.
KURZWEIL, H. & LINDER-SMITH, C. 2001. Machairophyllum van-
bredai. Flowering Plants of Africa 57: 64—69. t. 2172.
LIEDE, S. 1989. Untersuchungen zum Merkmalsbestand und zur
Taxonomic der 'Erepsiinae' (Mesembryanthemaceae). Beitrdge
zur Biologie der Pflanzen 64: 391—479.
LIEDE, S. 1990. Studies in the genus Erepsia — on the ecology of a
fynbos succulent. Mitteilungen aus dem Imstitut fiir Allgemeine
Botanik Hamburg 23b: 759-766.
LINNAEUS, C. 1762. Species plantarum, edn 2. Stockholm.
METCALFE. C.R. & CHALK, L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
RAPPA. F. 1912. Per una classificanzione naturale dei Mesembrian-
themi. Bolletin Reale Orto Botanico e Giardino Coloniale di
Palermo 11: 21-36.
RUTHERFORD. M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1994. Biomes of southern
Africa: an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Sun'ey of South Africa No. 63: 1-94,
SALM-DYCK, J.M.F.A.H.I. 1849. Mesembryanthemum albiduni.
Monographia generum Aloes et Mesembryanthemi. Bonn,
SCHWANTES. G, 1926. Bergeranthus. Zeitschrift fiir Sukkulentenkunde
II: 180. 181.
SCHWANTES, G. 1927. Einige neue Mesembriaceen. Mdllers Deutsche
Gdrtner-Zeitung 42: 187.
SCHWANTES, G. 1957. Flowering stones and mid-day flowers. Benn,
London.
SMITH. G.F., CHESSELET, P, VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., HART-
MANN, H.E.K., HAMMER, S., VAN WYK, B.-E., BUR-
GOYNE, P, KLAK, C. & KURZWEIL, H. 1998. Mesembs of
the world. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
SONDER, W. 1894. Mesembryaceae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder,
Flora capensis 2: 386-479. Reeve, London.
Bothalia 33,1: 41-47 (2003)
A new serotinous species of Cliff ortia L. (Rosaceae) from Northern
Cape, South Africa and section Arboreae emended
A.C. FELLINGHAM *
Keywords: Clijfortia L., new species, serotiny, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
A new species, Clijfortia dichotoma Fellingham, from the Oorlogskloof Escarpment, near Nieuwoudtville, Northern
Cape, is described and compared to its closest allies in the genus, Clijfortia arborea Marloth, which is widespread along
the escarpment of the Great Karoo from Calvinia in the north to Beaufort West in the southeast, and C. conifera E.G.H.Oliv.
& Fellingham from the Anysberg near Laingsburg, further east in the Karoo. The description of the section Arboreae is
emended here to include the new species, and the description of C. aborea is corrected.
INTRODUCTION
The more than one hundred species of the genus
Clijfortia L. represent an amazing variety of growth
forms. These range from delicate, herbaceous ground
covers to shrubs of various shapes and sizes, as well as
trees. Until recently only two trees had been recognized
and placed in the section Arboreae Weim. emend.
(Oliver & Fellingham 1994).
A third tree-like species was brought to my attention
by Prof. D.J. von Willett, who took it to be the well-
known C arborea. It is indeed more closely related to C.
arborea than to the third species in this section viz. C.
conifera, but also distinctly different from both.
Not only does the growth form set these tree-like
species apart from the rest of the species in the genus, but
they are also distinct in having highly condensed female
inflorescences. Furthermore, these inflorescences are
borne terminally on main stems or main branches and
always near the top of the trees, whereas the male inflores-
cences, which are much smaller and less condensed, are
borne on the same plants but lower down and on lateral
branchlets. This arrangement of male and female flowers
is rare in wind-pollinated plants (Proctor et al. 1996).
The similarity in these three species also includes
their habitats. In each instance it is the edge of an escarp-
ment, in fynbos in the cases of C. conifera and C.
dichotoma and in karroid shrubland for C. arborea
(Marloth 1905; Oliver & Fellingham 1994).
According to the owners of the Farm Papkuilsfontein
where the new species occurs, the known population had
not been subjected to fire for more than 20 years. This
could account for the fact that there are no seedlings or
young trees present and many trees are partly dead.
In this paper the terminology used by Weberling
(1981, 1983) for describing the structure of the inflores-
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont. Cape Town. Present address: 23 Moreson Avenue,
Valmary Park, 7550 Durbanville, South Africa.
MS. received: 2002-05-08.
cence, is followed. The ultimate flower-bearing element
is a highly condensed raceme (botryum), the co-flores-
cence. These racemes are aggregated into highly con-
densed double racemes (dibotrya) which are clustered
around the main axis of a compact synflorescence, form-
ing the cone-like female inflorescence. The positions in
which these female cones are borne, differ from each
other in the three species.
Cliffortia dichotoma Fellingham, sp. nov., C. ar-
borea proxime affinis, sed positione inflorescentiarum
feminarum strobiliformium in apicibus ramorum princi-
palium dichotomorum, non sequentialiter in ramis prin-
cipalibus, et foliis unifoliolatis parvis glabrescentibus,
non trifoliolatis multo longioribus et incano-pubescen-
tibus, differt.
TYPE. — 3119 (Lokenburg): Nieuwoudtville Dist.,
Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve, Farm Cipher Kop 804,
720 m, (-CA), 16-10-1996, Pretorins 396 (NBG, holo.;
BOL, K, MO, PRE).
Trees up to 5 m tall with main trunks butressed, up to
500 mm diam.; bark reddish brown, flaking; branching
pattern dichotomous, resulting in a spreading canopy.
Branches incano-floccose, glabrescent with age and
appearing segmented with leaf sheath residues from
obsolete primary leaves. Primary leaves unifoliolate,
stipulate, caducous except at swollen branch tips which
become female cone-like inflorescences; stipules lanceo-
late, up to 0.5 mm long, pungent, greyish brown, glabres-
cent; leaflets lanceolate, (10-)12(-15) mm long, pun-
gent, glabrescent, margins revolute. Secondary leaves
unifoliolate, exstipulate; vagina membranous, sheathing,
successive vaginas imbricate; leaflets ligulate, ( 1 .5-)
2.0-3.0(-3.3) X 0.9 mm, up to 0.5 mm thick; margins
revolute; upper surface glabrous greyish green, longitu-
dinally grooved, undersurface incano-floccose except for
revolute margins and distally raised main vein; apex
mucronate, mucro minute, translucent. Male inflores-
cence: a condensed raceme of 2 or 3, (rarely only 1)
flowers on a villous, highly condensed brachyblast in
axil of a secondary leaf subapically on a brachyblast on
lower part of a main branch bearing a female inflores-
cence apically. Male flowers: very shortly pedicellate.
42
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 1. — Clifforlia dichoumui. A, initiation of female cone as apical swelling on main stem; B, young female cone with numerous strap-shaped
styles/stigmas, apical continuation of mtiin axis as vegetative main stem and two robust lateral branches basally; C, primary cone leaf from near
apex of cone; D, apex of cone with four primary cone leaves subtending involucrally arranged groups of secondary cone leaves; E, primary
cone leaf with much-extended sheath, from equator of cone, therefore, apparently upside down; F, two female Bowers with (3)4 calyx lobes and
stnip-shaped styles/stigmas, borne on minute pedicels; G, pedicel with two braeteoles from female Bower; H, one bracteole from female Bower;
I, pedicel; J, smaller bracteole from female Bower; K, male Bower with pedicel, braeteoles and stamens; L, vegetative branchlet with male Bow-
ers; M, vegetative leaf with amplexicaul sheath, adaxial view; N, vegetative leaf, abaxial view; O, secondary cone leaf bearing capitulum-like
botryum in axil; P, capitulum-like botryum, hairs removed to show pedicels and bracts; Q, mature female intlorescence cone with 'shroud' of
vegetative lateral branchlets and proliferating apical main axis; R, S, fruits, variously faceted and narrowly winged or ridged. A, C-E, M-S,
drawn from Felliiif’hani I6H4, B, F-L, from Felliiif’lwm 1689. Scale bars: I mm.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
43
creamy white; bract narrowly triangular, up to 0.5 mm
long, long ciliate, whitish; sepals 4, broadly elliptical to
broadly obovate, 1. 5-2.0 x 1.2-1. 8 mm, apex subacute,
thickened, dorsally villous; stamens 4; filaments fili-
form, up to 2 mm long, glabrous; anthers up to 0.75 x 0.6
mm. Female inflorescence', many condensed double
racemes (homothetic dibotrya) each comprising a few,
sessile, capitulum-like co-florescences (botrya), aggre-
gated spirally on condensed main axis of an oblong,
cone-like polytelic synflorescence apically on a main
branch, one of a pair originating from below a cone of
previous season; flowering cones (30-)35^0 x (15-)
20-25 mm with apical proliferation of main axis
(30-)40-50(-60) mm long, secondary cone leaves green-
ish white incanous, interspersed with long maroon styles;
fruiting cones (40-)45— 55 x (18-)22-25 mm with api-
cal proliferation of main axis plus proliferation shoots of
lateral dibotrya, these thin vegetative branches up to 80
mm long and shrouding cone, caducous; leaves of pri-
mary cone axis ( primary cone leaves) unifoliolate, vagi-
na grossly expanded, woody, flushed with red, inter-
spersed with longitudinal cartilaginous veins and with
pungent woody stipules up to 2 mm long, ciliate, vaginas
sheathing main cone axis and segregating individual
dibotrya, leaflets narrowly elliptical, up to 2.5 x 1 mm
woody, pungent to minutely bifid with remnants of short
lanate indumentum basally; leaves of secondary cone
axis (secondary cone leaves) trifoliolate, arranged
involucre-like interspersing florescences (botrya), vagina
3.0-3.5 X 4—5 mm, dorsi-ventrally flattened, woody, longi-
tudinally furrowed, exstipulate, leaflets 3.0-3. 5 x 2. 0-2. 5
mm, greyish green, incano-floccose, conical-mucronate,
mucro 1.5-1.75 mm long, pungent, becoming woody,
leaflets of each leaf arranged in triangle, reducing in size
towards centre of involucre; co-florescence (botryum)
7-12-flowered, highly condensed with axis a flattened
platform of irregular shape bearing minute pedicels sub-
tended by reduced and modified bracts interspersed with
villous hairs. Female flowers: hidden except for styles
and tips of calyx lobes; bract subulate, up to 0.5 mm
long, long-ciliate, translucent; pedicel 0. 1-0.2 mm long;
sepals (3)4, linear-acute, 2. 0-2. 5 x 0. 3-0.5 mm, reflexed,
glabrous; receptacle cylindrical, 1.5-1. 7 x 0.75 mm.
faintly longitudinally furrowed, glabrous; style 1, linear,
plano-convex, 5. 5-6.0 x 0.2-0.25 mm, acute, spirally
twisted, exerted from cone, deep maroon, upper half
edged with short irregular teeth. Fruit: irregularly longi-
tudinally angled. 2. 3-2. 5 x 1.0-1. 2 mm, apically con-
cave around style remnant, dark brownish grey and
glabrous with two narrow whitish longitudinal wings;
retained within cone for several years. Figures 1, 2.
This new species differs from its closest ally, C.
arborea, mainly in the ultimate position of the female
inflorescence cones, which are borne terminally on the
dichotomous main branches, whereas those in C. arborea
occur sequentially on main stems. In both species the
female inflorescence cones originate terminally on main
branches, which subsequently proliferate beyond the
cones. In C. arborea, the apical proliferation shoots are
permanent structures, promoting longitudinal growth by
continuation of the main stems, which bear sequential
cones. In C. dicliotoma, how'ever, the proliferation shoots
soon become obsolete, leaving the cones in apical posi-
tions on dichotomous branches; longitudinal growth being
achieved by means of the development of two lateral
branches, from just below each cone, into dichotomous
main stems. It is in their ultimate condition and position on
the stem, that there is a marked difference between the
cones in C arborea and C. dicliotoma, and where the sim-
ilarity between the inflorescences in C. conifera and C.
dicliotoma is more pronounced, being terminal in both
species. The markedly dichotomous branching pattern that
arises as a result of the final condition and position of the
cones, is another character that clearly sets this new
species apart from its two allies. Furthermore, the (sec-
ondary) vegetative leaves of C. dicliotoma, differ from
those in C. arborea in being unifoliolate, small, and
glabrescent, whereas those of C. arborea are trifoliolate,
much longer and incano-floccose.
As in the case of C. arborea, herbarium specimens of
the new species are not always representative of the actu-
al condition in the wild. A far larger specimen than what
is practicable will have to be collected to reflect the true
positioning of the inflorescences and the vegetative
branching pattern. In most cases herbarium specimens
contain a single branch with a single terminal inflores-
cence only. This would in fact, be less than half of the
specimen needed to give a true history over two seasons
of the phenology and branching pattern in this species. In
contrast to the series of two cones on a single main stem,
which would represent the development over two sea-
sons in C arborea, the normal pattern in C. dicliotoma
would be three inflorescences, with the older one (of the
previous season) in the angle between two dichotomous
branches, each of which bears a terminal inflorescence of
the present season (Figure 2).
During his physiological research on C. dicliotoma.
Prof, von Willert raised seedlings which he reported as
being ‘tri-foliolate’. Photocopies made of these seedlings
seem to substantiate this finding. Close examination of
the actual material, however, led to the discovery of two
types of vegetative leaves, primary and secondary. Prof,
von Willert’s observations were of very young, trifolio-
late and exstipulate, or unifoliolate and stipulate, prima-
ry leaves (see below), before the development of vegeta-
tive short shoots with unifoliolate and exstipulate sec-
ondary leaves and the subsequent loss of the caducous
primary leaves.
Primary vegetative leaves occur on long shoots and
secondary vegetative leaves on (vegetative) short shoots.
Secondary thickening of the long shoots, causes the early
loss of the vegetative primary leaves, as their sheaths do
not enlarge to accommodate the thickening. They are thus
best observed on the apical swellings on main branches,
where they are permanent structures, destined to become
primary cone leaves on the primary short shoot (main
axis) of the female inflorescence cone, changing in form
and dimension as the cone develops. Both the primary
vegetative and primary cone leaves, can be interpreted as
being trifoliolate and exstipulate, or unifoliolate with
leaf-like stipules (Figure 1 A, C, E). Anatomical examina-
tion will have to be done to settle this question.
Secondary vegetative leaves, borne on vegetative short
shoots, are exstipulate, and of quite a different shape,
size and texture to the primary leaves. On older stems
44
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
C ^ D
only secondary leaves are visible, because of the
caducous nature of the primary vegetative leaves. The
secondary vegetative leaves are spirally arranged on
short shoots originating immediately above the residual
vaginas of the obsolete primary leaves and their vaginas
are imbricate (Figure IL-N).
Oliver & Fellingham (1994) noted ‘the development
of lateral branches from the cones’ in C. arhorea, but
erroneously interpreted these as ‘sterile, lateral, sec-
ondary branchlets within the cone’, that is to say, origi-
nating as vegetative branchlets and directly on the main
cone axis, independent of the secondary flower-bearing
axes of the cone. During the present study, however, it
became clear that these so-called ‘sterile, lateral, sec-
ondary branchlets’ of the female cone in C. arhorea are
FIGURE 2. — Longitudinal diagrams
of architecture and structure
of synflorescences. A, Clif-
fortia dichotomcv. female
synflorescence cone of previ-
ous growth season, terminal-
ly on a main branch, with
(younger) synflorescences on
two lateral branches. B, C.
arborea: three female synflo-
rescence cones on main
branch and two younger on
lateral branches originating
from older cones. C, part of
syntlorescence with three
dibotrya as in young synflo-
rescences in both C. dicho-
toma and C. arborea. D. E.
single co-florescence or
botryum (solid square) with
its individual flowers (open
circles); (similar in both spe-
cies). MA. main axis; SN,
syntlorescence; DB, dibot-
lyum; VB. vegetative branch;
CoF, co-florescence (botryum);
pci, primary cone leaf; scl,
secondary cone leaf; br, bract
of single flower; broken lines
in synflorescences A & B re-
present dibotrya; dotted zig-
zag lines in C-E represent
expanded highly condensed
axes.
in fact, the proliferation shoots of the condensed sec-
ondary flower-bearing axes (dibotrya) of the cone. This
means that they originate on the main axes as the basal
parts of the lateral (fertile) cone axes and not as separate
(sterile) vegetative shoots. It is only at the periphery of
the cone that the short shoots change into vegetative long
shoots — the proliferation shoots. As recorded in 1994,
these lateral branchlets on the cones are permanent struc-
tures and can develop into main branches bearing female
inflorescence cones. These in turn are capable of contin-
uing longitudinal growth in the same way as the main
axis of the cone from which they originated. The
schematic interpretation for the mature (lateral) cone in
C. dichotoina, before abortion of the lateral proliferation
shoots, also pertains to the structure in C. arborea
(Figure 2A-C).
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
45
In C. dichotoma, anthesis is marked by the appearance
of concentric circles of long, maroon styles, and by the
proliferation of the main axis of the cone into an apical
vegetative stem, a few centimetres long. After anthesis
this proliferation shoot lengthens somewhat. At this stage
the cone also becomes shrouded in an outcrop of sec-
ondary branchlets up to about 80 mm long, originating as
the proliferation shoots of the secondary inflorescence
branches (dibotrya). Up to this point in the development
of the inflorescence, it is similar to that in C arborea. In
C. dichotoma, however, this shroud of side branches is
eventually shed, as is the main proliferation shoot, leav-
ing the cone bare and terminal on a main branch. At this
latter stage, it more closely resembles the condition in C.
conifera, bearing its cone terminally (apically) on a
branch and is devoid of any lateral proliferation shoots.
In both of the last-mentioned species the growth points
of the main as well as the lateral cone axes have been
lost — in the case of C. dichotoma through abortion and
in C. conifera through loss of viability of the apical buds
of both the main axis and lateral axes of the cone. In rare
instances in C. dichotoma the main axis proliferation
shoot is retained beyond the time of fruiting (Fellingham
1706) (Figures IB, S; 2A).
With the loss of the growth point of the main branch
in C. dichotoma, two lateral branches from just below the
inflorescence cone and close to each other develop into
main branches which curve around the cone. These
branches supply two growth points to compensate for the
one lost and thus longitudinal growth is continued while
giving rise to the dichotomous vegetative branching pat-
tern that distinguishes this species. The female cones of
the next season develop apically on these two branches
(Figure 2A).
Rare occasions where three cones were produced in a
cluster, occurred during a very dry season following an
exceptionally wet one. These clusters of three cones were
in fact, the terminal cone, plus two cones, terminally on
extremely short lateral branches, from just below the
central cone. The development of dichotomous branches
and their apical cones, which normally stretches over
two seasons, was contracted into the same season, with
the resultant foreshortening of the branches, and the
simultaneous maturing of all three cones. This condition
can clearly be seen in the collections of Fellingham
1705, 1707 and 1711, all collected in October 1997.
Another unusual feature noticed during the same dry sea-
son following a very wet one, is the development of mul-
tiple lateral branches from below an aborted cone
{Fellingham 1708),
The onset of anthesis, as indicated by the swelling of
the apices of the dichotomous branches with their cover-
ing of enlarging imbricately arranged primary (vegeta-
tive) leaves, coincides with the maturing of the fruits in
the (central) cone of the previous season. Initially these
primary leaves do not differ from the primary stem
leaves, found on all main stems, which become obsolete
with secondary growth of the main stems, but it soon
becomes evident that these primary leaves remain imbri-
cate and the apical swelling enlarges. In contrast to the
sheaths of the primary vegetative leaves, the sheaths of
the primary cone leaves expand as the cone develops and
at the same time, remain in close proximity to each other
basally, as the main axis of the cone remains contracted
— the axis of a fertile short shoot. Furthermore, each pri-
mary leaf surrounds a developing synflorescence and
thus becomes a true primary cone leaf. The curvature of
the developing cone causes the imbricately attached
sheaths to fan out, so that those below the equator of the
cone seem to grow up-side down (Figure lA, C-E).
In contrast to the condition in C. dichotoma with the
loss of the growth points of both primary and secondary
proliferation shoots, these growth points are both
retained in C. arborea. Here the primary proliferation
shoot continues the vegetative growth of the main
branch, to give rise to a series of female cones, one per
season. Any two cones are thus separated by a length of
vegetative main branch, proliferating from the main axis
of the older cone. Similarly, proliferation of the lateral
cone axes (main axes of the dibotrya), give rise to per-
manent vegetative lateral branchlets, which are capable
of developing into stout lateral branches bearing female
inflorescence cones, which in turn can continue longitu-
dinal growth of the plant, through proliferation of both
axes of the cones. In this way a series of cones can devel-
op out of what was initially the lateral cone branchlets
(Figure 2B).
Oliver & Fellingham (1994) considered the possibility
that cone-like inflorescences might still be discovered in
other species. Known species with recorded compound
inflorescences, viz. C. heterophylla Weim., C. odorata L.f.
and C. hirsuta Eckl. & Zeyh. were noted, though none of
these was found to be cone-bearing. Of these three
species, the first two have subsequently been studied in
detail (Fellingham 1999; Fellingham & Linder in press).
The initial apical arrangement of imbricate modified
leaves, obscuring the reduced female flowers in C. hetero-
phylla, relates to the primary leaves covering the swollen
tip of a main branch, marking the onset of cone develop-
ment in C. dichotoma. In this early stage of development
of the inflorescence in C, heterophylla, the condensed
character of the apex of the main stem is evident in the
imbricate anangement of the modified leaves on it. As the
development of the inflorescence progresses through the
various stages from the early female, through the bisexu-
al to the male stage, the secondary condensed inflores-
cence axes become evident, as do the proliferation shoots
on these secondary axes, again mimicking C, dichotoma.
There is, however, also an unmistakable difference
between the inflorescence structures in these two species,
mainly in the demonstration of a peculiar plasticity mani-
festing itself in the total disappearance by integration and
not loss of the inflorescence in C. heterophylla, whereas
the cone-like inflorescence in C. dichotoma is retained for
a number of years, but eventually discarded (Fellingham
1999; Fellingham & Linder in press).
The relatively large flowers in C. odorata obscure the
complex nature of the inflorescence, to such an extent
that Weimarck (1934) described the flowers as being
‘fascicled in leaf axils’ and in another context, in racemes
that ‘approach the form of heads’(Weimarck 1948).
These ‘heads’ were found to consist of a number of head-
like subclusters of flowers, each with a condensed, short-
46
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Stalked axis, and implanted on a highly condensed disc-
like axis, in the axil of a vegetative leaf. The disc-like
structure in this species, though totally flattened, and far
more pronouncedly modified, is analogous to the highly
condensed main axis of the cone in the three cone-bear-
ing species, even to the extent of retaining a viable
growth point in the centre of the disc. The stalked sub-
clusters are analogous to the secondary axes of the cone-
like inflorescences. The loss of the viability of the
growth point of these secondary axes, renders it closer to
C. conifera than to the other two species in the section.
The arrangement on the secondary axes of the flowers in
smaller, closely packed groups with modified or even
absent bracts, is analogous to that of the ultimate flower-
bearing platforms in the cones (Fellingham 1999; Fel-
lingham & Linder in press).
As a result of the discovery of the error in interpreta-
tion of the lateral branchlets on the female cone in C.
arborea as discussed above, it is necessary to emend the
description of the species thus: the phrase 'with second
order axes continuing growth laterally’ should read 'with
second order cone axes continuing growth laterally'.
Section Arboreae H.Weim. emend. Fellingham
Shrubs and trees up to 5 m tall. Leaves uni- or trifolio-
late; stipules 0-2, subulate to foliaceous; leaflets revolute
or flat, entire to dentately 2-4-lobed. Male inflorescence:
a condensed raceme of 2-5 flowers on a lateral, highly
condensed, short shoot in axil of vegetative leaf. Male
flowers: sepals 3 or 4; stamens 4-10. Female inflores-
cence: a conoid synflorescence subterminally on main
branches with continued apical growth (C. arborea), api-
cally on main branches after loss of initial apical prolif-
eration fC. dichotoma) or apically on determinate lateral
short shoots fC. conifera), the synflorescences composed
of double racemes (dibotrya) each consisting of con-
densed co-florescences (botrya). Female flowers: sepals
3 or 4; receptacle triangular, narrowed to base, naiTowly
3-winged or 3-ridged (C. arborea, C. conifera) or irreg-
ularly longitudinally furrowed or angled, naiTowly 2-
winged (C. dichotoma): style/stigma single, linear, edges
irregular and shortly dentate, creamy white (C. arborea,
C. conifera) or maroon (C. dichotoma): achene single.
Species included: Cliffortia arborea Marloth (type
species), C. conifera E.G.H.Oliv. & Fellingham, C. dicho-
toma Fellingham.
PHYTOGEOGRAPHY
Cliffortia dichotoma is known only from a small area
on the Oorlogskloof Escarpment, around the waterfall on
the Farm Papkuilsfontein, about 25 km south of Nieu-
woudtville. Northern Cape (Figure 3). It grows at 700 m
which is much lower than either C. arborea at
I 500-1 800 m or C. conifera at I 300 m. It grows on
west-facing, rocky ledges near the edge of the escarp-
ment and about 500 m onto the plateau. This locality is
jiKst south of the Oorlogkloof Nature Reserve. The annu-
al rainfall in this region is typically very low, occurring
in late winter to early spring, if at all.
FIGURE 3. — Known distribution of Cliffortia dichotoma, •; C. ar-
borea O; C. conifera, H.
PHENOLOGY
Like C. arborea and C. conifera, C. dichotoma is
monoecious with unisexual male and female flowers
borne on separate branches. The female flowers are
borne in terminal or subterminal cones near or on the
ends of the main branches. The male flowers are borne in
small clusters in the axils of vegetative leaves on vegeta-
tive short shoots on branches. As in the related two
species, in C. dichotoma these branches are situated
below the female cones and mostly much lower down on
the plant {Fellingham 1685, 1689, 1712). It is also clear-
ly wind pollinated like the two known species in the sec-
tion and presumed for all species in the genus (Koutnik
1987). While sharing all the adaptive characters
(Koutnik 1987; Proctor et al. 1996) with other wind-pol-
linated plants, these coniferous species of Cliffortia have
a rare reversal of location on the plant, of the male and
female elements, with the male below the female. This
rare condition is shared with only one gymnosperm viz.
Finns sylvestris (Proctor et al. 1996). The question
remains as to whether this condition could be an adapta-
tion to pollination by updrafts prevailing at the edges of
the escarpments that are the preferred habitats of these
species. Apart from the obvious parallelism between
these three coniferous species and the evergreen seroti-
nous gymnosperm, they also share the phenomena of
anemophily and monoecy.
Except for the tips of the sepals and the long, strap-
shaped styles/stigmas, the female flowers are totally hid-
den within the involucres of secondary cone leaves. The
styles/stigmas in C. dichotoma are more showy than in
either C. arborea or C. conifera by virtue of their maroon
colour in contrast to the creamy white organs in the lat-
ter species. The fruits mature over a period of about a
year, during which time the cone undergoes a number of
changes. Apart from becoming more woody, it also
develops an apical proliferation shoot and lateral prolif-
eration shoots on the lateral cone axes. Both these types
of proliferation shoots are, however, shed quite soon.
This leaves the cone temporarily in an apical position on
the branch. It is, however, soon over-topped by the two
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
47
or more secondary branches originating from just below
the cone and destined to continue longitudinal growth of
the plant. The dichotomous branching pattern that results
is clearly marked by the retention of the cones for sever-
al seasons.
The flowering period in C. clichotoma is earlier and
shorter than in C. arborea or C. conifera, viz. between
late October and late November (Fellingham 1702,
1709- 1712). Male flowers were encountered in late
August 1995 (Fellingham 1684, 1685 & 1689) which is
rather surprising as female flowers were only found more
than a month later.
Paraty'pe material
C. clichotoma
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Lokenburg): Papkuilsfontein. rocky
ledges of Oorlogskloof Escarpment. SW aspect, 700 m, (-CA), 27-08- 1 99.S.
Fellingham 1684 (BOL, K, NBG. PRE); 28-11-96, Fellinghain 1702
(BOL male & female, NBG male & female, K male, PRE); Kranskloof,
rocky ledges, SW aspect, 700 m, (-CA), 24-10-1997, Fellingham 1705
(BOL, NBG, PRE); Fellingham 1706, (sheet 1 & 2 BOL); Fellinghain
1707 (BOL); near waterfall, 700 m, (-CA), 24-10-1997, Fellingham 1708.
1710- 1712 (BOL); 1709 (BOL, NBG. PRE); Oorlogskloof Nature
Reserve, Farm Cipher Kop 804, plateau at bottom of koppie on right of
Cipher Kop homestead, 720 m, (-CA), 16-10-1996, Pretorius 396
(BOL, K, MO, NBG, PRE); 'Papkuilsfontein’ on road to waterfall, on
rocky, sandy, flat plateau about 1 km from Oorlogskloof, and 2 km from
waterfall. (-CA), 20-08-1993. Van W\-k 626 (NBG); Niewoudtville area.
Papkuilsfontein, escarpment, from waterfall in De Hoop se Rivier,
northwards only to border with Kranskloof Farm, Von Willert ,r./r
(NBG).
Additional material examined
C. arborea
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia); Akkerendam, dolerite
screes and krantzes of Hantamsberg. 1 372 m, (-BD), 14-11-1955,
Acocks 18621 (BOL male & female, K male & female, NBG male);
summit of Hantam Peak. 1 660 m, (-BC). Wisura 3556 (NBG sterile);
Hantamsberg, Voetpadskloof, S-facing slope, renosterveld, 1 465 m,
(-BD), 3-09-1986. Oliver 8878 (NBG sterile); upper E slope of
Hantam Mtn. Vanrhynshoek Farm, kloof near stream, (-BD). 7-10-
1986. Thomas <& Van Jaarsveld 8961 (NBG sterile). 3220 (Sutherland):
Roggeveld. Farm Uitkyk, Sneeuwkrans, below krantz facing W. I 370
m, (-AD), 10-1920. Marloth 9730 (PRE stem & bark only, NBG male
& female); Hottentotsbank near Sneeukrans, W-facing .scree slopes,
1 433 m. (-AD), 22-9-1981, Ronrke 1728 (K .sterile, NBG sterile);
Roggeveld, southwestern krantzes on the Komsberg. I 550 m. (-DB),
04-1905. Marloth 3907 (BOL female, K male. NBG sterile);
Roggeveld Mtns. Komsberg. 1 525 m, (-DB). 10-1920, Marloth 9770
(PRE female. NBG female); just W of road at top of Komsberg Pass,
sandstone escarpment, (-DB). 22-09-1977, Moffett 1463 (NBG sterile);
plateau at top of Komsberg Pass, E of road, 1 600 m, (-DB), 02-1986,
Moffett & Steensina 4067 (NBG male); Komsberg Pass, lower slopes
ENE of Skurwekop. 1 500 m. (-DB), 4-06-1992, Oliver 10054 (BOL,
K. MO. NBG, PRE. S. all female). Without precise locality: mountains
near Sutherland. 12-1905, Du Toit sub BOL10057 (BM. BOL, K, all
sterile); Sutherland, shady side of very inaccessible kloofs, 13-10-1969,
De Villiers s.n. (NBG immature female). 3221 (Merweville): Sterk-
boomkloof near Vinkfontein, edge of kloof, 1 500 m, (-CA), 21-02-1986,
Moffett & Steensina 4060 (NBG sterile).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3222 (Beaufort West): Nuweveldberge, Karoo
National Park, mountain view area near EM tower, SW slope, 1 830 m,
(-BA), 17-11-1992, Fellingham 1624 (MO, NBG, PRE, all female);
Karoo National Park, mountain view, top of mountain, 1 830 m, (-BA),
3-01-1985, Shearing 893 (PRE female); Nuweveld Mtns, S slopes
above Beaufort West, 1 525 m, (-BC), 07-1940, Esterhuysen 2759a
(BOL sterile); Nuweveldberge, Karoo National Park, mountain view
area near the Look Out. 1 830 m. (-BC). 17-11-1992. Fellingham 1625
(BM, NBG. PRE, all male & female).
C. conifera
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Ladismith, Anysberg, E
end of Prinskloof, 1 300 m, (-BC). 23-09-1990, Oliver 9730 (NBG,
PRE. S, all female); ibid. 10-08-1991, Fellingham 1531 (NBG female);
ibid. 4-06-1992, Oliver 10055 (BOL, MO, NBG. PRE, all male and
female); Anysberg, E end, gully leading to Prin.sberg, (-DA), 6-10-1982,
M. van Wyk 1072 (NBG female).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I appreciate the help received from Dr E.G.H. Oliver
in preparing the Latin diagnosis and for editing. My
thanks go to Mrs I.M. Oliver for useful tips on preparing
the illustrations and for drawing the schematic diagram.
I want to thank Mr W.A. Pretorius and Mr J. Afrika, con-
servation officers of the Oorlogskloof area, for guiding
me to the outlying units of the population. Without the
friendly reception and accommodation received from the
owners of the Farm Papkuilsfontein, Mr and Mrs W.N.D.
van Wyk, this project could not have been undertaken.
REFERENCES
FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1999. Phenology and branching in eight select-
ed species of the genus Cliffortia L. M.Sc. thesis. University of
Cape Town. Cape Town. Unpublished.
FELLINGHAM, A.C. & LINDER, H P In press. Inflorescences of
Cliffortia L. (Rosaceae). Bothalia.
KOUTNIK. D. 1987. Wind pollination in the Cape flora. In A.G. Rebelo,
A preliminary synthesis of pollination biology in the Cape flora.
South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 141:
126-133.
MARLOTH, R.H. 1905. Eine neue interessante Cliffortia vom Rogge-
veld. Botanische Jahrbiicher 29: 318, 319.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1994. Anew serotinous spe-
cies of Cliffortia (Rosaceae) from the southwestern Cape with
notes on Cliffortia arborea. Bothalia 24: 153-162.
PROCTOR, M., YEO, P. & LACK. A. 1996. The natural histoiy of polli-
nation. Harper Collins, London.
WEBERLING, F. 1981. Morphologie der Bluten und der Blutenstande.
Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
WEBERLING. F. 1983. Fundamental features of modern inflorescence
morphology. Bothalia 14: 917-922.
WEIMARCK, A.H. 1934. Monograph of the genus Cliffortia. Gleer-
upska, Lund.
WEIMARCK, A.H. 1948. The genus Cliffortia, a taxonomical survey,
Botaniska Notiser 1948: 167-203.
Bothalia 33,1:49-51 (2003)
A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 3. The
reinstatement of L. ensifolia^ L. galpinii and L, sandersonii
TJ. EDWARDS* and S. VENTER*
Keywords: Hyacinthaceae, Ledebouria Roth, South Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Three taxa of Ledebouria Roth are raised from synonymy to species status, with notes, diagnostic characters and dis-
tributions. L. galpinii {Baker} S. Venter & T.J. Edwards is a narrow endemic in the Wolkberg Centre and was formerly placed
within L. cooperi (Hook.) Jessop. The other species, L. sandersonii (Baker) S. Venter & T.J. Edwards and L. ensifolia (Eckl.)
S. Venter & T.J. Edwards, are closely allied to each other, sharing a number of synapomorphies.
INTRODUCTION
In his revision of Scilla L. in South Africa, it was neces-
sary for Jessop (1970) to place a large contingent of
species into Ledebouria Roth. This subdivision of Scilla
saw the sinking of a number of valid species and result-
ed in some confusion in the taxonomy of Ledebouria. In
his paper Jessop (1970) alerted readers that the ‘lump-
ing’ involved may have been too drastic. His inclusion
of a wide range of morphologically divergent forms
within L. cooperi (Hook.) Jessop was necessary; however,
S. galpinii Baker and S. sandersonii Baker need to be re-
surrected.
In our opinion L. undulata (Jacq.) Jessop also em-
braces more than a single species and is subdivided into
L. ensifolia (Eckl.) S. Venter & T.J. Edwards and L. undu-
lata sensu stricto. This subdivision is necessitated by the
differences in gynoecium and bract morphology.
1. Ledebouria ensifolia (Eckl.) S.Venter & T.J. Ed-
wards, comb. nov.
Drimia ensifolia Eckl. in South African Quarterly Journal 1 : 364
(1830). Scilla ensifolia (Eckl.) Britten: 201 (1908). Type: Uitenhage.
Zwartkops River. Zeyher 10 (K!. lecto. selected here; -PRE. photo.!).
D. ludwigii Miq.: 39 (1839). Idothea ludwigii (Miq.) Kunth: 681
( 1843). Scilla ludwigii (Miq.) Baker: 9 ( 1870). Type: Caput bonae Spei,
on the sand hills near the Zwartkops River. Ecklon & Zeyher 1064 (U.
holo.; GRA!; PREI).
D. apertiflora Baker: t. 19 (1868) synon. nov. Ledebouria aperti-
flora (Baker) Jessop: 254 (1970) synon. nov. Type: Saunders Refugium
Botanicum 1 : t. 19(1 868 ).
Scilla prasina Baker: 10 (1870). Type: Kaffirland. Gill s.n. (Kl, holo.;
-PRE. photo.!).
S. pusilla Baker: 183 (1876). Type: Transkei. Bazeia. Baur293 (K!,
holo.; -BOL. drawing!; -PRE, photo.!).
S. ecklonii Baker: 7 (1892). Type: Tambukiland, mountains between
Silo and Windvogelberg. Ecklon & Zeyher 12 (B!, holo.).
* School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal, Private Bag XOl,
3209 Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg.
MS. received: 2002-03-15.
Plants solitary. Bulb hypogeal, cylindrical, 40-60 x
20-30 mm; dead bulb scales hard, dark brown to purple,
apices attenuate; live bulb scales membranous. Leaves
5-10, fully developed at anthesis, spreading, narrowly
ovate to ensiform, 80-150 x 15^0 mm, fleshy, dull
glaucous, usually immaculate; base canaliculate; apex
acute; margin smooth. Inflorescences 1-3, dense, 8-320
mm long, 30-100-flowered; scape flaccid, terete, 50-200
mm long; bracts ±1x1 mm, deltoid, fleshy, green, with-
out bracteoles; pedicels patent, 3-4 mm long, green.
Perianth stellate; tepals green to pink with a dull green
keel, shai-ply reflexed, equal, oblong, 3. 0-3. 5 x 1.5 mm;
apex acute. Stamens erect, ± 3 mm long; filaments pink,
epitepalous; anthers ± 1 mm long. Ovary ellipsoid, 6-
lobed, ± 1.0 x 2.5 mm, carpels oblong with papillate
basal lobes; style triangular in section, ± 1.5 mm long,
glabrous, puiple; stipe up to 0.5 x 0.5 mm. Capsule 3-
lobed, symmetrical, globose; base truncate. Seed ellip-
soid, 3-5 mm long, surface wrinkled, brown.
L. ensifolia differs from other species of Ledebouria
in having fusiform roots. The species is widespread,
occurring on sandy soils derived from quartzites, gneiss
or rhyolite in woodlands or shrublands (Eigure 1). L.
cooperi and L. revoluta (L.f.) Jessop are commonly
misidentified as L. ensifolia but both have bracteoles and
50
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
smooth carpel lobes; the latter also has elongate styles (±
6 mm). In addition, the torn leaves of L. revoluta reveal
‘threads’ (from unravelling xylem), no such ‘threads’
occur in the leaves of L. efisifolia.
Jessop ( 1970) placed L. ensifolia in synonymy with L.
imdulata which, in our opinion, is not a close ally. The
latter species has ovoid bulbs, lacks fusiform roots, lacks
papillate basal lobes on the ovary and has bracteoles. In
addition the undulate leaf margins, from which the
species was named, are consistently absent from L. ensi-
folia. Instead L. ensifolia appears to be closely allied to
L. sandersonii which also lacks bracteoles, lacks ‘threads’
in the torn leaves, has solitary bulbs and prominent papil-
late lobes on the carpel bases.
Vouchers: Acocks 16235 (PRE); Barker 6900 (NBG); Harrison 231
(NH); Moss & Rogers 540 (J); Rogers 28366 (GRA); Schlechter 18
(BOD.
2. Ledebouria galpinii (Baker) S. Venter & TJ. Ed-
wards, comb. nov.
Scilla galpinii Balcer in Flora capensis. 6: 487 (1896). Type: Eastern
Transvaal [Mpumalanga], summit of Duiwel's Kantoor, Galpin 672
(PRE!, lecto., designated here; BOLI, GRAI, NH!, SAM!, Z).
Plants usually gregarious. Bulb ovoid, hypogeal,
20-30 X 20-25 mm, neck 1-2 x 3-5 mm, usually with
bulblets on basal stem; dead bulb scales brown, apices
truncate; live bulb scales fleshy, aiTanged loosely; cata-
phylls 1-3, exserted above ground. Leaves fully devel-
oped at anthesis, 3 or 4, humifuse, oblong to ovate-
spathulate, 50-80 x 20-25 mm, fleshy, without threads
when torn, glossy purple to green-puiple, adaxial surface
lacunose, venation obscure; margins smooth; base
canaliculate; apex mucronate. Inflorescences 1-3, sub-
globose, 10-20 X 10-20 mm, flaccid, 20-30-flowered, as
long as or longer than leaves, extending in fruit; scape
usually twisted basally, purple, 20-50 mm long; bracts
fleshy, linear-lanceolate, up to 1 x 0.5 mm, pink to pur-
ple; bracteoles present; pedicels patent, 3^ mm long,
purple. Perianth stellate; tepals subequal, oblong, 4-5 x
2 mm, pink to purple, keel green; apex obtuse, cucullate.
Stamens spreading, 3^ mm long; filaments maroon;
anthers up to 0.5 mm long, violet. Ovary globose, 3-
lobed, ± 1.5 X 1 mm, lobes obtusely ovate; style up to 3
mm long, triangular in section, purple; stipe ± 0.5 x 0.5
mm. Capsule globose, base truncate. Seed elliptic,
1 .5-2.0 mm long, surfaces strongly wrinkled, red-brown.
L. galpinii occurs on Black Reef Quartzites of the
Wolkberg Group (SACS 1980). The species may be
added to the list of 130 endemics within the Wolkberg
Centre of Endemism (Van Wyk & Smith 2001) ( Figure
1 ). Plants occur in mistbelt sourveld often in association
with Streptocarpus galpinii Hook.
Jessop’s (1970) reduction of L. galpinii into syn-
onymy with L. cooperi is unwarranted. L. cooperi is a
plant of seepages and vleis, it is .soboliferous and quick-
ly forms dense populations. By contrast, L. galpinii is a
plant of lithosols and, while occasionally producing
basal bulbs, is never soboliferous. Bulb morphology dif-
fers significantly, L. galpinii has ovate bulbs with trun-
cate apices compared to the acuminate apices of L.
cooperi. L. galpinii frequently produces 3 cataphylls but
in L. cooperi cataphylls are always solitary. The leaves of
L. galpinii are fleshy, flat, broadly ovate and humifuse,
whereas those of L. cooperi are mesic, canaliculate,
lanceolate and erect. The most obvious distinguishing
character of L. galpinii is the corrugated adaxial leaf sur-
face, embossed with regular pits. Plants of L. cooperi are
always more floriferous, producing between 20 and 60
flowers per raceme, the inflorescences of L. galpinii have
less than 30 flowers. Lastly the pedicels of L. galpinii are
usually 3^ mm long, whereas those of L. cooperi are
6-12 mm. The abundance of distinguishing characteris-
tics, and the occunence of L. galpinii in an area re-
nowned for plant endemism, leaves us in no doubt of its
specific status.
Voucliei-s: Codd 9789 (PRE); Galpin 672 (BOL. GRA. NBG. NH,
PRE); Van der Merwe 2047 (PRE); Venter 13389 (UNIN).
3. Ledebouria sandersonii (Baker) S.Venter & T.J. Ed-
wards, comb. nov.
Scilla sandersonii Baker in Saunders Refugium Botanicum 3 (Ap-
pend.): 5 (1870). Type: Transvaal, without precise locality. Sanderson
s.n. (K!, holo.; -PRE. photo.!).
S. baiirii Baker: 484 (1896). Type: Tembuland. Bazeia Mountain,
Baar 550 (K!. holo.; -PRE, photo.!; SAM!).
S. rysonii Baker: 484 (1896). Type: Griqualand East, Tyson s.n. (K!,
holo.; -BOL!, drawing; -GRA!, drawing).
S. oostachys Baker; 487 (1896). Type: Upper Umkomaas, Wood
4627 (K!, holo,; -BOL!, drawing; -NH!, -PRE, photo.!).
S. dipinlla Baker: 489 (1896). Type: Barberton. Saddleback Range,
Galpin 1182 (K!. holo.; BOL!, GRA!, NH!. PRE!, SAM!).
S. hella Markbtter: 13 (1930), Type: Oliviers Hoek Pass, Thode
STE3372 (STE!, holo.; -PRE, photo.!).
Plants solitary. Bulb hypogeal, ovoid to subglobose,
10-30 X 10-15 mm; dead bulb scales membranous,
brown, apices attenuate; live bulb scales membranous.
Leaves 2-6, fully developed at anthesis, spreading or
appressed, ovate to broadly lanceolate, 15-75 x 8-30
mm, fleshy, dull glaucous; adaxial surface sometimes
blotched with purple; abaxial surface suffused with pur-
ple; base canaliculate; apex acute; margin smooth.
Inflorescences 1 or 2, lax, 12-22-flowered, 20-25 mm
long; scape erect to flaccid, terete, 20^0 mm long;
bracts deltoid, ± 1.0 x 0.5 mm, fleshy, pink to purple,
without bracteoles; pedicels patent, 6-8 mm long, pink.
Perianth stellate; tepals pink, sometimes with a dull
green keel, recurved, equal, oblong, ±3x1 mm, apex
acute. Stamens erect, ± 3 mm long; filaments purple
above, white below, epitepalous; anthers ± 1 mm long.
Ovary ovoid, 6-lobed, ±1x2 mm; carpels oblong with
papillate basal lobes; style ± 3 mm long, triangular in
section, glabrous, purple; stipe up to 0.5 x 0.5 mm.
Capsule 3-lobed, symmetrical, globose; base truncate.
Seed ellipsoid, ± 2.5 mm long, surface wrinkled, brown.
The inclusion of Scilla sandersonii within L. cooperi
obscures its true alliances. By his recognition of the
.sandersonii series it is clear that Jessop (1970) was
aware of divergence within his broad concept of L.
cooperi. Examination of the gynoecium of L. .sander-
BothaIia 33.1 (2003)
51
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Ledeboitria sandersonii.
sonii reveals a synapomorphy shared with L. ensifolia. In
these species the carpel bases are strongly lobed and are
adorned with papillae. Although closely allied to L. ensi-
folia. L. sandersonii is easily distinguished by its small-
er bulbs (10-30 X 10-15 mm versus 40-60 x 20-30 mm)
and the absence of fusiform roots. In addition, the leaves
of L. sandersonii are fewer (1-6 vs. 5-10), smaller and
broader (15-75 x 8-30 mm vs. 80-150 x 15^0 mm). L.
ensifolia is more floriferous producing 30-100 flowers
per raceme, whereas inflorescences of L. sandersonii sel-
dom produce more than 20 flowers. Flowering time:
October to November.
L. sandersonii is commonly associated with montane
grassland in the eastern parts of southern Africa where it
grows in shallow soils, overlying rock outcrops (Figure
2). These soils act as seepages in summer and frequently
freeze in winter. Both maculate and immaculate forms of
L. sandersonii occur, but mixed populations have never
been encountered.
Vouchers; Brown 323 (BOL); Compton 27803 (NBG, PRE); Kerfoot
8168 (PRE); Strey 9362 (NH. PRE); Van der Mern-e 2602 (NU).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial assistance from the Natal University Research
Fund and the FRD is gratefully acknowledged. The cited
herbaria are thanked for the loan of material examined
during this study. Ms C. Potgieter and the anonymous
referees are thanked for suggestions made on the manu-
script.
REFERENCES
BAKER. J.G. 1868. Saunders Refugium Botanicum 1: t. 18. 19.
BAKER. J.G. 1870. Monograph of Scilla: sections Ledeboitria and
Drimiopsis. Saunders Refugium Botanicum 3 (Append.): 1-18.
BAKER, J.G. 1876. New bulbous plants from the Cape. Journal of
Botany, London 5: 183.
BAKER. J.G. 1892. Liliaceae novae Africae australis herbarii regii
Berolensis. Botanische Jahrbiicher 15 Beiblatt 35: 7.
BAKER. J.G. 1896. Scilla in Flora capensis 6; 478— f 94.
BRITTEN. J. 1908. Overlooked Cape plants. Journal of Botany 46: 201.
ECKLON. C.F. 1830. Plants found in the District of Uitenhage. South
African Quarterly Journal 1 : 364.
JESSOP. J.P. 1970. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae; 1. Scilla. Sclilzo-
carplius and Ledeboitria. Journal of South African Botany 36:
233-266.
KUNTH. C.S. 1843. Enwneratio plantarum 4: 338-681 . Cotta. Stuttgart
& Tubingen.
MARKOTTER. E.I. 1930. In Annale van die Universiteit van Stellen-
bosch. Reeks A, 8, afl. 1:13.
MIQUEL, F.A.W. 1839. Drimia in Melanges Botaniques. Bulletin des
Sciences Physique et Naturelles en Neerlande: 39.
SOUTH AFRICAN COMMITTEE FOR STRATIGRAPHY (SACS)
1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa, Part 1. Handbook of the
Geological Survey of South Africa.
VAN WYK. A.E. & SMITH. G.F. 2001. Regions offloristic endemism
in southern Africa. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
* .* ^ '” . . • ■■- :>.v^-
r;ra ■•.■' J'Tl. ■' '
""^^ir* » ‘ft
yfc,f Jv*-f • ’. p •'III-.’ -tmi f)< ‘I* ^..'X^MJ'if A* i *:•• «U^%R.:«'vW,T0W4LLvi»‘*i^
. i/j'fcWiwt .* * ' I ■■ .l 'Ifet 4 ^ "
’>J'' -t'< ‘i’
: vU‘;’»>y f . , 'fe-tittl.,. ,..- . g,|
.,.,M .. ;;"V' ;. . fF- ^
^ ’ *’ -■r^.’r-^f’ ' ■ ' ■•• '.s' '''-lb'
•_s;\'fi. ‘ i'*-;; V:. , ('it. ‘ V|. ,. . jifS'^'. -I
Mjj -' I fif j;
rvCfi*^ ^ ■^^’'\.‘V‘j^^
w>; ^i^'ifr- •■ ■*%.... .^
_ ■ ■ '**V ;1£ iw-ff ' ^»•iflfe'
<^»v R5 i:i,^«i^-'.ftSij|^;*i!;i|V " ■■'•4* -I' ■(w»','nU;»
•j,^>?iAf r * '••'■ >' ' "* ,4->'iV-'
"'■1; ,: rti*.- ' '*W X «.in^'jpi^; 1 >*- ••.f. vV^„. 4'- '
li' ''™
k« TffW, i' •K>il‘rVT«'Vf'
■f'-' ■>
—M if j, ,'ift.f s^ i
'V •'
" ■'"■ 'L^ '* ■ f*.i »• Y'*‘'-'*f-V**''’ ^■4''<" ■' ' WVf
‘t-4*- .,.„,i=^ „,;■ IF •'! 'i'l'i,; , ■ ' '■^*- ■'( *f ivV -^4, ,,n
)\,,;,"i6i>.‘ , '‘. (U>;ni. ■ V ,'• ; ..‘i •.?/., :vJ#> . i.. ,
.;• • ..I'*,**, i * -' ll. ■•%■..■ .im ;4«4y ^’iinMl '3^' >.Jef ",
* ^'ii' * ■• 4/.- . '■ ■'
' .. Y.-' ■
I «, ":' *'
i- -. ' • • ■j.'.’ifii*'
©
Bothalia 33,1: 53-57 (2003)
An annotated checklist of the pteridophyte flora of Swaziland
J.P. ROUX*
Keywords: checklist, flora, Pteridophyta, southern Africa, Swaziland
ABSTRACT
An herbarium and literature-based review of Swaziland pteridophytes showed the poor species record and distribution
data available for these plants. Field work carried out over a period of 17 days resulted in a further 15 species recorded and
this brings the number of pteridophyte taxa known for the country to 112.
INTRODUCTION
An herbarium and literature-based review of
Swaziland pteridophytes showed the poor distribution
data available for these plants in the country. This con-
clusion was reached having worked through the check-
lists of Compton (1966) and Kemp (1981, 1983), and
the collections at the Bolus Herbarium (BOL), Natal
Herbarium (NH), National Herbarium of Swaziland
(SDNH), and the Compton Herbarium (NBG). A list of
collections held at the National Herbarium, Pretoria
(PRE) was also consulted. The checklist of Compton
(1966) is primarily based on his own collections assem-
bled during his stay in Swaziland, whereas those of
Kemp (1981, 1983) are based on herbarium records and
field work.
To improve the distribution data of the known species,
and record new taxa for the country, 17 days of intensive
collecting was done, from 6th to 22nd May 2002, trying
to cover as much territory as possible. Well-collected
areas were largely avoided due to the time constraint.
The drought, which was experienced during the time,
limited collecting in especially the lowveld and eastern
regions of the country. In spite of these constraints, 15
pteridophyte species are here recorded for the first time
for the Flora of Swaziland. This brings the number of
taxa known for the country to 112. This number will
undoubtedly increase significantly as the flora of the
country becomes better known. A more detailed account
of the pteridophyte flora of Swaziland is currently in
preparation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The taxonomic arrangement followed is that of Roux
(2001). The numbers following the name refers to the
respective checklists available for the country: 1,
Compton (1966); 2, Kemp (1981); and 3, Kemp (1983).
Names that do not comply with the names in current use,
are in italics and placed in square brackets. A single
voucher, where possible the first recorded for the coun-
try, is cited to substantiate its occurrence in Swaziland.
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2002-06-19.
PSILOTACEAE
Psilotum nudum (L.) P.Beauv., 1, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Siteki, Blue Jay Ranch, rocks near stream in
shade, ± 152 m, (-AA), 15 Dec. 1959, Compton 29588 (NBG.
SDNH).
EQUISETACEAE
Equisetum ramosissimum Desf. subsp. ramosissimum, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Bulunga Poort, sandy streambed, ± 304 m, (-DA),
18 Dec. 1963, Compton 31842 (NBG, NH, PRE).
LYCOPODIACEAE
Huperzia
gnidioides {L.f.) Trevis. [Lycopodium gnidioides L.f.]. 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): falls 16 km from Manzini (Bremersdorp), (-AD),
3 July 1953, Schutte 48 (BOL).
verticillata (L.f.) Trevis. [Lycopodium verticillatum L.f.], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): falls 16 km from Manzini (Bremer.sdorp), (-AD),
3 Apr. 1953, Schutte 49 (BOL).
Lycopodium
clavatum L., 1,3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Havelock Concession, (-CC). 15Sept. 1890, Stdt-
marshe 1022 (BOL, PRE).
Lycopodiella
sarcocaulon {A. Braun & Welw. ex Kuhn) Pic.Serm. [Lycopodium car-
olinianum L.; L. carolinianum L. var. grandifolium Spring], 2
-2631 (Mbabane): Stroma, wet black peat below spring, ± 1 216 m,
(-AC), 4 July 1961, Compton 30675 (SDNH).
cernua (L.) Pic.Serm. [Lycopodium cernuum L.], 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Komassan Ridge, (-CC), 22 July 1890, Sah-
marshe 982 (PRE).
SELAGINELLACEAE
Selaginella
dregei (C.Presl) Hieron., 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Forbes Reef, (-AA), 2 Jan. 1905, Burn Davy 2794
(PRE).
imbricata (Forssk.) Spring ex Decne., 2, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Mbuluzi Gorge. Blue Jay Ranch, S of gorge, 3
mis NNW of Mhlumeni border post, (-AA), 12 Nov. 1977,
Culvenvell 1174 iPRE).
kraussiana (Kunze) A.Braun, 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.3 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist kloof,
(-CC), 30 June 1953, Schutte 1 (BOL).
mittenii Baker. 1 . 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ukutula, moist shady rocks, (-AC), 15
Eebr. 1955, Compton 24932 (PRE).
OPHIOGLOSSACEAE
Ophioglossum
lusoafricanum Welw. ex Prantl
-2631 (Mbabane): Malolotja Nature Reserve, wardens house, near
stream above road to house, (-AA), 5 March 1989, Braun 691 (PRE).
reticulatum L., 1,3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Secreterial garden, ± I 216 m, (-AC), 5
Jan. 1956, Compton 25274 (SDNH).
MARATTIACEAE
Marattia fraxinea Sm. [M. fraxinea Sm. var. salicifolia (Schrad.) C.Chr.],
1,3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ukutula, (-AC), 7 May 1955, Compton
25120 (PRE).
54
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
OSMUNDACEAE
Osmunda regalis L., 1,3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, by stream, (-AC), 18 Jan. 1951,
Compton 22441 (NBG),
Todea barbara (L) T.Moore, 2, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Horo Forest, (-CB), Wager 125 (PRE).
GLEICHENIACEAE
Gleichenia
polypodioides (L.) Sm„ 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, ± 1 520 m,
(-CC), 9 May 1958, Compton 27835 (NBG, PRE, SDNH).
umbraculifera (Kimze) T.Moore. 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, bushy places, (-AC), July 1951, Comp-
ton 22745 (NBG).
Dicranopteris linearis (Burm.f) Underw., 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, hilltops, (-AC), 1917, Lovemore .s.n.
(BOL).
HYMENOPHYLLACEAE
Hymenophyllum tunbridgense {L.) Sm., 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, occasion-
al on wet dripping rock faces in deep shade in forest, ± 1 520 m,
(-CC), 13 July 1956, Schelpe 6185 (BOL).
Crepidomanes
borbonicum (Bosch) J.P.Roux [Trichomanes borbonicum Bosch], 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, locally
common on wet rock faces in deep shade in forest, ± 1 368 m,
(-CC), 14 July 1956, Schelpe 6186 (BM, BOL, K).
inopinatum (Pic. Serin.) J.P.Roux
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, hill NE of Mbabane, ± 1 368 m, (-AC),
21 Nov. 1957, Compton 27250 (NBG, PRE, SDNH). Material be-
longing to this species has often been identified as Trichomanes pyx-
idiferum L. var. melanotrichiim (now Crepidomanes melanotrichum
(Schltdl.) J.P.Roux).
melanotrichum (Schltdl.) J.P.Roux [Trichomanes pyxidiferum L. var.
melanotrichum (Schltdl.) Schelpe], 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu, King’s Forest, infrequent in deep shade
on rocks in forest, 1 259 m, (-CC), 7 May 2002, J.P Roux 3398 (NBG).
Cephalomanes rigidum (Sw.) K.lwats. [Trichomanes rigidum Sw.], 3
-2631 (Komatipoort): Mdzimba Mts, Manzimnyana Falls, infrequent
in wet mossy areas among Osmunda along main stream, shaded,
(-AD), 26'’25.140’S, 3n6.178’E, 10 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3514
(NBG). It is not clear if Wager 190 (PRE), made in Lomati Gorge,
originates from Swaziland or from South Africa.
SCHIZAEACEAE
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Sw.. 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ukutula, (-AC), 27 Febr. 1955, Compton
24971 (NBG).
ANEMIACEAE
Anemia dregeana Kunze. 2
-2531 (Komatipoort): Horo Forest, (-CB), Wager 126 (NBG).
Mohria vestita Baker [as M. caffrorum (L.) Desv.], 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Horo Forest, (-CB), Wager 117 (PRE).
PARKERIACEAE
Ceratopteris thalictroides (L) Brongn.. 2, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Lubombo Mts, Mbuluzi Poort, Mlawula Farm,
Nkumbane stream, (-AA), 22 May 1976, Ciilverwell 95 (PRE).
PTERIDACEAE
Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link var. aureoflava (Hook.) Weath. ex
F.M. Bailey
-2631 (Mbabane): Malolotja Nature Reserve, Ngwenya Mine, park-
ing area between pits, (-AA), 24 May 1990, Braun 962 (PRE). This
species, a native of tropical America, has been introduced to various
parts of the world. In South Africa it is known from Mpumalanga,
KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape. The first known collection from
Swaziland is that of K.P. Braun made on 24 May 1990 at the
Ngwenya Mine, now included in (he Malolotja Nature Reserve. The
species is now widespread in the western part of the country where
it mostly inhabits disturbed sites.
Actinioptcris radiata (J.Kdnig ex Sw.) Link. 2. 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Lubombo Mts, 17 km N of Siteki on Siteki/Mhlu-
meni road between Groenpan and Cyrildene Farms, (-BD), 8 May
1976, Culverwell 72 (PRE),
C’heilanthes
bergiana .Schltdl.. 2, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Horo Forest, (-CB), Wager 128 (PRE).
cckloniana (Kunz.e) Melt.. 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Hlatikhulu, (-CD), 13 Nov. 1956, Compton 26231
(PRE).
multifida (Sw.) Sw. [including C. multifida (Sw.) Sw. subsp. lacerata
N.C. Anthony & Schelpe], 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, (-AC), 15 Jan. 1951, Compton 22384
(NBG).
quadripinnata (Fomk.) Kuhn [Pellaea quadripinnata (Forssk.) Prantl],
3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.3 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist kloof,
(-CD), 30 June 1953, Schiitte 11 (BOL).
viridis (Forssk.) Sw.
var. viridis [Pellaea viridis (Forssk.) Prantl var. viridis]. 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.3 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist
kloof, (-CC), 30 June 1953, Schutte 66 (BOL).
var. glauca (Sim.) Schelpe & N.C.Anthony [Pellaea viridis (Forssk.)
Prantl var. glauca (Sim) Sim], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, rock crevices, (-AC), 5 Febr. 1952,
Compton 23295 (NBG, NH).
var. macrophylla (Kunze) Schelpe & N.C.Anthony [Pellaea viridis
(Forssk.) Prantl var. macrophylla (Kunze) Sim], 1, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Jilobi Forest, forest floor, 500 m, (-CA), 1 1 Jan.
1979, Kemp 1480 (SDNH),
Pellaea
calomelanos (Sw.) Link var. calomelanos, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane area, (-AC), 1 July 1953, Schutte 27 (BOL).
dura (Willd.) Hook., 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Gobholo, ± 1 160 m, (-AC), 18 Apr. 1963,
DIamini s.n. (SDNH).
pectiniformis Baker
-2731 (Louwsburg): Mahamba, Mahamba Gorge, N-facing quartzitic
cliffs above Mkhondvo River, in narrow exposed rock crevices,
(-AA), 27°03.984’S, 31°03.359’E, 18 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3711
(NBG). In South Africa the species has until now been known from
Limpopo [Northern Province], Mpumalanga, Gauteng and North-
West and further south from south-central KwaZulu-Natal. This col-
lection narrows the gap between these northern and southern distri-
butions.
Doryopteris concolor (Langsd. & Fisch.) Kuhn [Doryopteris concolor
(Langsd. & Fisch.) Kuhn var. kirkii (Hook.) R.E.Fr.; Cheilanthes
concolor (Langsd, & Fisch.) R.M.Tryon & A.F.Tryon], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Mantenga Falls, rocks, (-AC), 29 Jan.
1964, Compton 31921 (PRE).
Adiantum
capillus- veneris L., 1,3
-2631 (Mbabane): Hlatikhulu, Mamiti River, shady streambank, + 608
m, (-CD), Compton 27956 (NBG, PRE).
poiretii J.E.Wikstr. [Adiantum thalictroides Willd. & Schltdl.], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane. Darkton, streambanks, ± 1 368 m, (-AC),
Compton 27869 (NBG, PRE, SDNH),
raddianum C.Presl
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu, ± 1.5 km from Bulembu on Pigg’s Peak
road, common on moist, shaded roadcutting, (-CC), 25°56.661’S,
3 1 °08.672’E, 7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3426 (NBG). This tropical Ameri-
can species has become naturalized in many parts of southern Africa.
Pteris
catoptera Kunze
var. catoptera, 1 , 3
-2631 (Mbabane): falls 16.09 km from Manzini (Bremersdorp),
(-AD), 3 July 1953, Schiitte 42 (BOL).
var. horridula Schelpe
-2631 (Mbabane): Ntondozi Summit, rare in deep shade in forest
along seasonal drainage line, (-CA), 26°37.897’S, 31°10.017’E,
1 274 m, 15 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3575 (NBG). This variety has
until now been known from only two collections in southern
Africa, the one from Mpumalanga and the other from the
Drakensberg in KwaZulu-Natal (Burrows & Crouch 1995), The
Swaziland collection narrows the gap between these disjunct sites,
cretica L.. 1,3
-263 1 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Stroma, forest, ± 1 216 m, (-AC), Comp-
ton 25828 (NBG, PRE, SDNH).
dentata Forssk.
-2531 (Komatipoort): ± 3.2 km from Bulembu on road to Pigg’s
Peak, on moist, shaded roadcutting, (-CC), 25°56.722’S, 31°084’E,
7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3419 (NBG). Widespread in southern Africa,
occurring in Mpumalanga and neighbouring Swaziland, Until now
the species has gone unnoticed by collectors in Swaziland,
friesii Hieron., 3
-2631 (Mbahinc): Siteki, moist kkxif, (-BD), 8 July 1953, Schutte 58 (BOL).
viltata L., 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock) mine dump, (-CC), 30
June 1953, Schiitte 21 (BOL).
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
55
VITTARIACEAE
Vittaria isoetifolia Bory
-2531 (Komatipoort); Bulembu, King’s Forest, epiphytic on Cyathea
dregei in forest, deeply shaded, (-CC), 25°56.317’S, 31°08.028’E, 1
316 m, 7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3397 (NBG). Occurs along moister
southern and eastern parts of South Africa with no collections
recorded between northern KwaZulu-Natal and southeastern
Mpumalanga. The Swaziland collection slightly narrows the gap
between these disjunct distributions.
CYATHEACEAE
Cyathea
capensis (Lf.) Sm„ 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, frequent
in wet forest, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 13 July 1956, Schelpe 6181 (BOL).
dregei Kimze, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): mts above Mbabane, (-AC), 19 May 1948, Rodin
4526 {BOL, PRE).
DENNSTAEDTIACEAE
Microlepia speluncae (L) TMoore
-2531 (Komatipoort): Songea Range, Hhoro Forest, in partial shade
along main stream, (-CB), 25°44.215’S, 31°24.218’E, 8 May 2002,
J.P. Roux 3442 (NBG). Has a somewhat unusual and scattered dis-
tribution in southern Africa with isolated collections known from
Limpopo [Northern Province], North-West and KwaZulu-Natal.
This new record for Swaziland occurs in a somewhat isolated ravine
and may be the reason why it has escaped recording.
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn subsp. aquilinum, 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): between Bulembu (Havelock) Mine and Pigg’s
Peak, (-CC), 30 June 1953, Schutte 19 (BOL).
Hypolepis sparsisora (Schrad.) Kuhn, 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.3 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist
kloof, (-CC), 30 June 1953, Schutte 8 (BOL).
Blotiella glabra (Bory) R.M.Tryon, 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, ± 1 520
m, (-CC), 9 May 1958, Compton 27833 (NBG. PRE, SDNH).
POLYPODIACEAE
Lepisorus schraderi (Men.) Ching [Pleopeltis schraderi (Mett.) Tardieu],
1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Hlatikhulu, forest margin, ± 1 216 m, (-CD), Comp-
ton 26364 (NBG, SDNH).
Polypodium polypodioides (L.) Watt, subsp. ecklonii (Kimze) Schelpe,
1. 3
-2631 (Mbabane): The Caves. Mbuluzi 'Valley, shady rocks, ± 1 368
m, (-AC), 17 March 1956, Compton 25798 (NH, PRE).
Microgramma mauritiana (Willd.) Tardieu [as M. lycopodioides (L.)
Copek], 1, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Siteki, Jilobi Forest, along rocks and twigs, ± 608
m. (-CA), 14 Sept. 1961, Compton 30718 (NBG, PRE, SDNH).
Pleopeltis macrocarpa (Bory ex Willd.) Kaulf. [as Pleopeltis lanceolata
(L.) Kaulf.], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, (-AC), 1905. Burn Davy 2796 (PRE).
Loxogranune abyssinica (Baker) M.G. Price [as Loxogramme lanceola-
ta (Sw.) C.Presl], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): hill NE of Mbabane, shady rocks in forest, ± 1 368
m, (-AC), 21 Nov. 1957, Compton 27251 (SDNH).
NEPHROLEPIDACEAE
Nephrolepis exaltata (L.) Schott
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane area, (-AC), 1 July 1953, Schutte 30
(BOL). This species is native to tropical America, but has natural-
ized in many parts of South Africa. Although it has been recorded as
early as 1953 from the Mbabane area, it has never been taken up in
any of the checklists. It is, however, cited by Schelpe & Anthony
( 1986). The species has now also become naturalized at Bulembu.
THELYPTERIDACEAE
Ampelopteris prolifera (Retz.) Copel.
-2631 (Mbabane): old bridge across Komati River, S bank, moist
area E of road, (-AA), 30 Jan. 1992, Braun 1300 (PRE).
Cyclosorus intemiptus (Willd.) H.lto [Thelypteris interrupta (Willd.)
K.Iwats.; T. totta (Thunb.) Schelpe], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): 19.3 km from Manzini, (-AD), 1 July 1953, Schutte
35 (BOL).
Amauropelta bergiana (Schltdl.) Holttum var. bergiana [Thelypteris
bergiana (Schltdl.) Ching], 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, frequent
in forest undergrowth in moist conditions, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), Schelpe
6166 (BOL).
Thelypteris confluens (Thunb.) C.V.Morton [T. palustris Schott var.
squamigera (Schltdl.) Weath.], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Pholinjane River, vlei, ± 1 216 m, (-AC),
18 Apr. 1956, Compton 25897 (NBG, PRE, SDNH).
Stegnogramma pozoi (Lag.) K.Iwats.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu, King’s Forest, frequent in deep
shade along moist streambanks in forest, (-CC), 25°56.317’S,
31°08.028’E, 1 316 m, 7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3406 (NBG). This
collection falls within the general north-south distribution of the
moisture -dependent species in South Africa. This collection narrows
the gap between the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga distributions.
Pneumatopteris unita (Kimze) Holttum [Thelypteris madagascariensis
(Fee) Schelpe], 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, locally
common in deep shade in wet forest undergrowth, ± 1 520 m, (-CC),
13 July 1956, Schelpe 6180 (BOL).
Christella
dentata (Forssk.) Brownsey & Jenny [Thelypteris dentata (Forssk.)
E.P.St.John], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, forest, (-AC), July 1951, Compton 22748
(NBG).
hispidula (Decne.) Holttum
-2531 (Komatipoort): Songea Range, Hhoro Forest, along main stream
in forest, moist conditions, (-CB), 25°44.456’S, 31°23.667’E, 8 May
2002, J.P. Roux 3438 (NBG). This pantropical species has only
recently been recorded for the first time from KwaZulu-Natal, pre-
viously known from eastern Zimbabwe and further north (Burrows
& Burrows 2001). The Swaziland collections narrow these disjunct
distributions.
gueinziana (Mett.) Holttum [Thelypteris gueinziana (Mett.) Schelpe],
3
-2631 (Mbabane): 19.3 km from Manzini, (-AD), 1 July 1953, Schutte
34 (BOL).
DRYOPTERIDACEAE
Nothoperanema squamiseta (Hook.) Ching [Dryopteris squamiseta
(Hook.) Kuntze], 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, wet rock
faces in deep shade, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 13 July 1956, Schelpe 6178
(BOL).
Dryopteris
athamantica (Kimze) Kuntze, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ukutula, (-AC), 10 Nov. 1954, Comp-
ton 24689 (NBG).
lewalleana Pic. Serin.
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ukutula, edge of forest, ± 1 216 m,
(-AC), 16 May 1956, Compton 25922 (NBG, PRE, SDNH). D.
lewalleana forms part of the D. inaequalis species complex with the
result that material belonging to it have always been misidentified.
pentheri (Krasser) C.Chr.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, ± 1 520
m, (-CC), Compton 27829 (NBG, SDNH). Like D. lewalleana, D.
pentheri has generally also been included into D. inaequalis. It is a
tetraploid species more frequently inhabiting exposed environments.
Polystichum
luctuosum (Kimze) TMoore, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Stroma, (-AC), 23 March 1956, Compton 25822
(NBG, PRE, SDNH).
macleae (Baker) Diels, [as 'macleaii'], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Ngwenya Mtn, (-AA), 27 March 1962,
Compton 31405 (NBG, SDNH).
pungens (Kaulf.) C.Presl [as P. lucidum], 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Miller’s Falls, ± 1 368 m, (-AC), 16 May 1956,
Compton 25922 (NBG, PRE, SDNH).
transkeiense W.Jacobsen
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, ± 1 520
m, (-CC), 9 May 1958, Compton 27831 (NBG, PRE). Material be-
longing to this species has always been erroneously identified as
Polystichum pungens.
Didymochlaena truncatula (Sm'.) J.Sm.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu, King’s Forest, frequent in deep
shade along stream in forest, (-CC), 25°56.317’S, 31°08.028’E,
1 3 16 m, 7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3402 (NBG); Farm Wyldsdale, for-
est on S-face of Lufafa, common in streambed in deeply shaded for-
est, (-CD), 25°48.596’S, 31°16.341’E, 12 May 2002, J.P. Roux
3553 (NBG). This moisture-loving species is relatively common at
both sites, where it was collected, growing along perennial streams
in deep shade.
56
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
TECTARIACEAE
Tectaria gemmifera {Fee) Alston
-2531 (Komatipoort): Songea Range, Hhoro Eorest, common in deep
shade on forest Boor, (-CB), 25°44.215'S, 31°24.218’E, 8 May
2002, Roux 3451 (NBG). Relatively localized in South Africa with
scattered disjunct populations occurring in Limpopo, Mpumalanga,
and KwaZulu-Natal. At both sites in Swaziland the species is com-
mon, often forming large monospecific stands on moist, not too
deeply shaded forest floors,
Megalastrum lanuginosum (Willd. ex Kaulf) Holttum
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu, King’s Forest, frequent along stream
in deep shade in forest, (-CC), 25°56.785’S, 31°12.263’E, 1 259 m,
7 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3414 (NBG). It is remarkable that this majes-
tic fern, widespread in southern and East Africa, the Madagascan
region and the islands in the Gulf of Guinea, has gone unnoticed in
Swaziland. In southern Africa it falls within the north-south distrib-
ution of most mesophytic ferns,
WOODSIACEAE
Athyrium scandicinum (Willd.) C.Presl, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, rare on
wet rock-face in forest, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 13 July 1956, Schelpe 6177
(BOL).
Deparia japonica (Thunb.) M.Kato
-2531 (Komatipoort): Farm Wyldsdale, forest in ravine on S face of
Lufafa, (-CD), 25°48.092’S, 31°16.852’E, 11 May 2002, J.P Roux
3549 (NBG). Deparia japonica, a native of Asia and Australia, has
become naturalized in South Africa, recorded from KwaZulu-Natal
and Mpumalanga. For Swaziland the species was first recorded from
the Pigg’s Peak area (Burrows 1990). The species now appears to be
more widespread in Swaziland with collections made near Mbabane
and at Hlatikhulu.
OLEANDRACEAE
Oleandra distenta Kunze. 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, The Caves, Black Mbuluzi Valley, rock
clefts, ± 1 368 m, (-AC), 17 March 1956, Compton 25799 (NBG, PRE,
SDNH).
Arthropteris monocarpa (Cordetn.) C.Clir.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Farm Wyldsdale, Ugutugulo River, on season-
ally moist S-facing cliffs and in screes above river, (-CD),
25°48.092’S, 31°16.852’E, 11 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3533 (NBG).
Known from KwaZulu-Natal and an isolated collection from
Mpumalanga, the Swaziland collection effectively narrows the gap
between these disjunct distributions.
LOMARIOPSIDACEAE
Elaphoglossum acrostichoides (Hook. & Grev.) Schelpe, 1, 2
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, occasion-
al on mossy boulders on forest floor, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 13 July
1956, Schelpe 6174 (BOL).
BLECHNACEAE
Blechnum
attenuatum (Sw.) Mett. [Blechnum giganteum (Kaulf.) Schltdk], 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.03 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist kloof,
(-CC), 30 June 1953, SchUtte 7 (BOL).
australe L, 1,3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Miller’s Falls, forest floor, ± 1 368 m,
(-AC), 7 June 1956, Compton 25969 (NBG, SDNH).
capense Burm.f. [Blechnum sylvaticum Schelpe], 3
-2631 (Mbabane): 16.09 km from Manzini, (-AD), 3 July 1953,
Schiiile 52 (BOL).
intlexum (Kunze) Kuhn
-2631 (Mbabane), Ntondozi summit, infrequent in shade among
bushes and granite rocks, (-CA), 26°37.897’S, 31°10.017’E, 1 274
m, 15 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3580 (NBG). Restricted to the southern
and eastern mountains ranging from the western Cape to eastern
Zimbabwe. The Swaziland collection falls within this north-south
distribution,
punctulatum ,Sw.
var. punctulatum. 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane. Ngwenya Mts, shady rocks, ± 1 672
m, (-AA), 18 Febr. 1957, Compton 26680 (NBG, SDNH).
var. alherstonei (Pappe & Raw.son) Sim
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Fonteyn, shade of boulders, ± 1 368
m, (-AC), 8 June 1956, Compton 25979 (NBG, NH, SDNH).
tabulare (Thunb.) Kuhn, 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): 19.3 km from Bulembu (Havelock), moist kloof,
(-CC), 13 June 1953, Schiiile 5 (BOL).
ASPLENIACEAE
Asplenium aethiopicum (Burm.f. ) Bech.
subsp. aethiopicum, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): near Forbes Reef, ± 1 520 m. (-AA), Compton
29638 (NBG, SDNH). Braithwaite (1986) showed that A.
aethiopicum subsp. aethiopicum forms part of an extensive poly-
ploid series, this subspecies being a sexual octoploid.
subsp, tripinnatum (Baker) A.F.Braithw.
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Duiker Bush, ± 1 520 m, (-AC),
Compton 25541 (NBG, PRE, SDNH). This subspecies is a sexual
tetraploid (Braithwaite 1986).
subsp. filare (Forssk.) A.F.Braithw.
-2631 (Mbabane): 16.09 km from Manzini (Bremersdorp). (-AD),
SchUtte 55 (BOL). This material belongs to octoploid apomict
pteudq/i/are (Braithwaite 1986)
anisophyllum Kunze, 1 , 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, occasion-
al on wet rock faces in shade of forest, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 1 3 July 1956,
Schelpe 6175 (BOL).
boltonii Hook, ex Brause cfe Hieron.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Pigg’s Peak, Devil’s Bridge Forest, (-CD), 4
May 1960, Compton 30042 (NBG, PRE, SDNH). The collection
was initially erroneously identified as A. anisophyllum Kunze.
erectum Bory ex Willd.
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane, Malandela, ± 1 216m, (-AB), 10 Feb. 1965,
Compton 32260 (NBG, PRE). The collection was initially erroneous-
ly identified as A. lunulatum Sw.
inaequilaterale Willd., 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Horo Forest, (-CB), Apr. 1932, Wager 127 (BWE).
lobatum Pappe & Rawson, 1 , 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Mbabane. Malandela, dense forest, ± 1 216 m (AB),
19 Febr. 1965, Compton 32271 (NBG, PRE, SDNH),
multiforme Krasser
-2731 (Louwsburg): ridge E of Grandis Mountains, near Galile school,
road between Hlatikhulu and Nhlangano, (-AA), 27°00.785’S,
31°14.568’E, 17 May 2002, J.P. Roux 3706 (NBG). This is an octo-
ploid belonging to the A. splendens Kunze polyploid complex
(Braithwaite 1972). The species is also ecologically distinct, as it
inhabits rock crevices in seasonally dry, more exposed environments,
rutifolium (P.J.Bergius) Kunze, 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Forbes Reef, (-AA), 1 Jan. 1905, Burtt Davy 2731
(PRE).
sandersonii Hook.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Farm Wyldsdale, forest in ravine on the south-
ern face of Lufafa, (-CD), 25°48.596’S. 31°16.341’E, 12 May 2002,
J.P. Roux 3551 (NBG). Widespread in Central and East Africa
extending to Eastern Cape in the south. The Swaziland collection
slightly narrows the disjunct Eastern Cape/KwaZulu-Natal popula-
tions and the Mpumalanga/Limpopo populations,
splendens Kunze subsp. splendens. 1, 3
-2531 (Komatipoort): Bulembu (Havelock), King’s Forest, frequent
on forest floor, ± 1 520 m, (-CC), 13 July 1956, Schelpe 6155 (BOL).
theciferum (Humb. Bonpl. et Kunth) Mett., 1, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Hlatikhulu, forest, ± 1 216 m, (-CD), 13 Nov. 1956,
Compton 26243 (NBG, SDNH).
unilaterale Lam.
-2531 (Komatipoort): Farm Wyldsdale. Ugutugulo River, on rocks in
seepage area, (-CD), 25'’48.092’S, 31°16.852’E, 11 May 2002, J.P.
Roux 3536 (NBG). Widespread in the palaeotropics, has recently
been recorded for the first time in southern Africa (Burrows &
Burrows 2002). By coincidence the same species was collected
independently on the same day in the same ravine.
MARSILEACEAE
Marsilea
ephippiocarpa A/.s-ro/), 1, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Mlawula Station, Mlawula Farm, Nkumbane stream,
3.2 km S of station, E of farm track, (-AA), 29 May 1977, Culver-
well 840 (PRE).
fenestrata Launert, 3
-2631 (Mbabane): Siteki Dist., Hlane, swamp, ± 304 m, (-BB), 18Jan.
1960, Compton 29735 (NBG, SDNH).
minuta L. var. minuta. 2, 3
-2632 (Bela Vista): Mbuluzi River, Mlawula Farm. 4 km NE of station,
(-AA), 29 May 1977, Culverwell 807 (PRE).
Species excluded
Anemia simii Tardieu, 1
Complon (1966) lists the species as ‘authentically recorded but not
represented in the herbarium’. Jacobsen ( 1983) also lists the species
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
57
for Swaziland, but no herbarium collections from this country were
located.
Blechnum aitriculalum Cav., 1
A Compton collection lodged in the Compton Herbarium (NBG)
named as such belongs to Blechnum punctulatum Sw. var. punctula-
tum.
Cheilanthes involuta (Sw.) Schelpe & N.C. Anthony, 3
No collections belonging to this species could be traced to verify its
occurrence in Swaziland.
Cheilanthes involuta (Sw.) Schelpe & N.C. Anthony var. obscura
(N.C. Anthony) N.C. Anthony [Cheilanthes viridis (Forssk.) Sw.
var. obscura N.C. Anthony], 3
No collections belonging to this species could be traced to verify its
occurrence in Swaziland.
Marsilea aegyptiaca Willd., 2
The species was first listed by Kemp (1981). based on Culvenvell
840 (PRE). The collection has since been identified as belonging to
M. ephippiocarpa Alston.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my gratitude to the Steering
Committee of the Southern African Botanical Diversity
Network (SABONET) and Prof. G.F. Smith for support-
ing this project. My thanks also go to Kate Braun who
shared and provided valuable information whilst in
Mbabane; the National Herbarium, Pretoria, for provid-
ing a printout of their Swaziland holdings; and the
Curators of the Bolus (BOL) and Natal (NH) Herbaria
for allowing me to work through their collections. The
assistance of the staff at the National Herbarium of
Swaziland is also appreciated, and the Swaziland
National Trust Commission is thanked for allowing
access to the national parks.
REFERENCES
BRAITHWAITE, A.F. 1972. The cytotaxonomy of the Asplenium splen-
dens complex in South Africa. Journal of South African Botany
38: 9-27.
BRAITHWAITE, A.F. 1986. TYis Asplenium aethiopicum complex in South
Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 343-378.
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies.
Frandsen Publishers, Sandton.
BURROWS, J.E. & BURROWS, S.M. 2001. New distribution records
for southern African Pteridophyta. Bothalia 31: 205-207.
BURROWS. J.E. & BURROWS, S.M. 2002. A new fern record for the
Flora of southern Africa region. Bothalia 32: 195, 196.
BURROWS. J.E. & CROUCH, N.R. 1995. New distribution records of
South African pteridophytes. Bothalia 25: 236-238.
COMPTON. R.H. 1966. An annotated check list of the flora of Swazi-
land. Journal of South African Botany, suppl. vol. 6.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. The ferns and fern allies of southern Africa.
Butterworth, Durban.
KEMP, E.S. 1981. Additions and name changes for the flora of Swazi-
land. Swaziland National Trust Commission.
KEMP, E.S. 1983. A flora checklist for Swaziland. Occasional Papers 2,
Swaziland National Trust Commission.
ROUX, J.P. 2001. Con.spectus of southern A frican Pteridophyta. South-
ern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 13. Cape
Town.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In O.A.
Leistner, Flora of .southern Africa. Department of Agriculture
and Water Supply, Pretoria.
Bothalia 33,1: 59-98 (2003)
Taxonomy of the genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae)
C.L. BREDENKAMP* and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: anatomy, cladistics, endemism, macromorphology, new species, palynology, Passerina, southern Africa, taxonomy, Thymelaeaceae
ABSTRACT
Passerina L, is mainly a southern African genus, comprising 20 species and four subspecies, A few species occur along
the Great Escarpment, two extend into Zimbabwe and Mozambique, but most are concentrated in the Cape Floristic Region.
Palynological, macromorphological and anatomical evidence was used in the delimitation of the genus and its infrageneric
taxa, A cladistic study supports Passerina as a monophyletic genus, A genus treatment, key to species and a full species
treatment are given. Each species treatment includes a taxonomic diagnosis, description and notes on taxonomy, etymolo-
gy. economic value and distribution. Illustrations of representative species are provided and distribution maps are included
for each species. P. esterhuyseniae Bredenk. & A.E. van Wyk is newly described. A list of excluded species names high-
lights the previous cosmopolitan taxonomic interpretation of Passerina, as many names are now in synonymy under other
genera of the Thymelaeaceae.
CONTENTS
Abstract 59
Introduction 59
Thymelaeaceae 59
Passerina 60
Materials and methods 61
Passerina E 61
Key to species 65
1 . P. paleacea Wikstr 66
2. P. trimcata (Meisn.) Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk ... 68
[for a complete description see Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk in Bothalia 32: 66 (2002a)]
3. Passerimi qiiadrifaria Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk ... 68
[for a complete description see Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk in South African Journal of
Botany 68: 304 (2002b)]
4. Passerina niontana Thoday 68
5. Passerina burchellii Thoday 70
6. Passerina ericoides L 71
7. Passerina rigida Wikstr 73
8. Passerina nivicola Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk 74
[for a complete description see Bredenkamp &
Van Wyk in Bothalia 32: 77 (2002c)]
9. Passerimi esterlnryseniae Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk ... 75
10. Passerina comosa (Meisn.) C.H. Wright 76
11. Passerina pendida Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Thoday .... 77
12. Passerina galpinii C.H. Wright 78
13. Passerina drakensbergensis Hilliard & B.L.Buitt ... 80
14. Passerina corymbosa Eckl. ex C.H. Wright 81
15. Passerina obtiisifolia Thoday 82
16. Passerina paludosa Thoday 84
17. Passerina montivaga Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk ... 85
[for a complete description see Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk in Bothalia 32: 34 (2002d)]
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag XlOl. 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany. University
of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2002-1 1-08.
18. Passerina filifonnis L 85
[for a complete description see Bredenkamp &
Van Wyk in Bothalia 32: 29-34 (2002d)]
18a. subsp. filiformis 85
18b. subsp. glutinosa (Thoday) Bredenk. & A.E.van
Wyk 85
19. Passerina falcifolia (Meisn.) C.H. Wright 85
20. Passerina rubra C.H.Wright 87
Doubtful name 89
Excluded names 89
Specimens examined 92
Acknowledgements 94
References 95
Index to taxa (also doubtful and excluded names) 97
INTRODUCTION
Thymelaeaceae
Applying the sexual system of classification, Lin-
naeus (1754) placed the genus Passerina under Class
VIII, Octandria, 1. Monogynia. This system was followed
until De Jussieu (1789) instated the family Thymelae-
aceae, with the following genera: Dirca L., Lagetta Juss.,
Daphne L., Passerina L., Stellera L., Struthiola L. Dich-
naea L„ Dais L., Gnidia L., Nectandra Berg, and Quisqualis
L. Wikstrom (1818) accepted the Thymelaeaceae, but
based the infrafamilial classification on the number of
stamens, following Linnaeus. The most important con-
tributions towards the infrafamilial classification of the
Thymelaeaceae, based on morphological characters, were
made by Endlicher (1847), Meisner (1857), Bentham &
Hooker (1880) and Gilg (1894a). Using anatomical char-
acters, further contributions were made by Van Tieghem
(1893), Gilg (1894b) and Leandri (1930).
Domke (1934) proposed a widely adopted subfamilial
classification for the Thymelaeaceae and divided the family
into four subfamilies, namely Gonystyloideae, Aquilari-
oideae, Gilgiodaphnoideae and Thymelaeoideae. The genus
Passerina is classified under the Thymelaeoideae. Based
on palynological evidence Archangelsky (1971: fig. 10)
added the new subfamilies Octolepidoideae, Microsem-
60
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
matoideae and Synadrodaphnoideae and raised the
Gonystyloideae to the family Gonystylaceae (also recog-
nized by Takhtajan 1997, amongst others). Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk (1996) published new evidence on the struc-
ture of the pollen wall in Passerina resulting in the ele-
vation of the subtribe Passerininae Endl. to the mono-
generic tribe Passerineae (Endl.) Bredenk. & A.E.van
Wyk. Evidence obtained from floral morphology, anato-
my, embryology and palynology indicates that the
Thymelaeaceae has a strong malvalean relationship, an
affinity also supported by molecular data (APG 1998;
Magallon et al. 1999). The possible phylogenetic rela-
tionships of the Thymelaeaceae are discussed by
Bredenkamp & Van Wyk (2001b).
The Thymelaeaceae is currently considered a family
of ± 58 genera and ± 720 species. (Mabberley 1989;
Brummitt 1992; Takhtajan 1997). It is subcosmopolitan
and the distribution of the genera is listed by Mabberley
( 1989), as follows:
Africa: temperate southern Africa — Dais L., Englero-
daplme Gilg, Gnidia L., Lachnaea L., Passerina L., Peddiea
Harv., Struthiola L., Synaptolepis Oliv.; tropical Africa —
Craterosiphon Engl. & Gilg, Dicranolepis Planch., Octo-
lepis Oliv., Synandrodaphne Gilg.
Asia: Aetoxylon Airy Shaw, Amyxa Tiegh., Drapetes
Lam., Eriosolena Blume, Pentathymelaea Lecomte, Rham-
noneuron Gilg, Restella Pobed., Wikstroemia Endl.
Australia: Arnhemia Airy Shaw, Drapetes Lam.,
Pimelea Banks & Sol., Oreodendron C.T.White.
Europe: Daphne L., Diarthron Turcz.
Japan: Daphnimorpha Nakai, Edgeworthia Meisn.
Madagascar: Stephanodaphne Baill.
Malesia: Aquilaria Lam., Enkleia Griff., Gonystylus
Teijsm. & Binn., Linostoma Wall, ex Endl., Phaleria Jack.
Mediterranean region: Thyme laea Mill.
New Ccdedonia: Deltaria Steenis, Lethedon Spreng.,
Solmsia Baill.
North and South America: Daphnopsis Mart. & Zucc.,
Dirca L., Eunifera Leandro ex C.A.Mey., Goodallia Benth.,
Digetta Juss., Lasiadenia Benth., Linodendron Griseb.,
D>phostoma Meisn., Ovidia Meisn., Schoenobiblus Mart.
Sri Lanka: Gyrinops Gaertn.
Perhaps the economically most important character in
the family is its tough fibrous bark. The bark of
Wikstroemia, Daphne, Edgeworthia, Thymelaea and
Daphnopsis is used for rope, and in the manufacturing of
bank notes and strong paper. Elexible shoots of Dirca are
used for baskets. Bark of Pimelea was used as a source
of twine by early settlers in Australia.
Many genera are also known for their medicinal
value. The wood of Wikstroemia is a source of incense
and that of W. ovata C.A.Mey. is a strong purge. In China
the bark of Daphne is used as an apparently safe and effi-
cient abortifacient; it contains the glycoside daphnin and
an acrid resin (mezerein) giving plants a bitter taste. The
decaying heartwood of Aquilaria malaccensis Lam. is
saturated with a resin which is the basis of incense and
when distilled it is used in perfume and medicine.
The genera Pimelea, Edgeworthia and Daphne are cul-
tivated for horticultural purposes. The scent of Daphne
flowers is camation-like and attractive to Lepidoptera;
some members are moth-pollinated. Gonystylus bancanus
(Miq.) Kurz. is a peat swamp-forest tree, with knee-roots.
Its lightweight commercial timber is used for dowelling
and is much exported from Indomalesia.
In southern Africa, the bark of various genera is used
for tying down thatch, for plaiting into whip thongs and
for twine. Dais cotinifolia L. is an ornamental tree with
attractive flowers, occurring mostly along the eastern
regions of the country.
Passerina
In his comprehensive work on the circumscription of
the Thymelaeaceae and infrafamilial taxa, Domke (1934)
gave a complete historical review of the intergeneric clas-
sification of Passerina. He included the southern African
genera Dais, Gnidia (= Lasiosiphon), Struthiola, Lachnaea
(= Cryptadenia) and Passerina in the tribe Gnidieae, sub-
tribe Gnidiinae of the subfamily Thymelaeoideae. Breden-
kamp & Van Wyk (1996) place Passerina in the mono-
generic tribe Passerineae on the basis of mainly pollen
characters. Currently Passerina is considered advanced at
the intergeneric level, as many of the advanced character
states present in other genera of the Thymelaeoideae are all
found together in this genus. The most prominent charac-
ters distinguishing Passerina are the exserted, extrorse
anthers and the unique anemophilous habit (Bredenkamp
& Van Wyk 1996, 2001b).
The infrageneric classification of Passerina is docu-
mented by Linnaeus (1753) in his Species plantarum, in
which he described P. filiformis, P. hirsuta, P. ciliata
and P. uniflora. P. filiformis is the only species that is
currently recognized in Passerina. Publications men-
tioned in the applicable protologue and in synonymy to
the various species that pre-date the nomenclatural start-
ing point for the Spermatophyta [International Code of
Botanical Nomenclature, Article 13.1 [Greuter et al. 2000)]
are Linnaeus’s Hortus Cliffortianus (1737), Van Royen
(1740), Plukenet (1700: 180), Breyne (1678) and Burman
(1739). The generic name Passerina appearing in Species
plantarum (Linnaeus 1753) is associated with the subse-
quent description given in Genera plantarum (Linnaeus
1754) (Greuter et al. 2000, Article 13.4).
Wikstrom (1818) recognized 41 species of Passerina
and the subspecies P. filiformis subsp. divaricata', of these
only four species are presently recognized in Passerina. In
the interim the subspecies was raised to species level and is
presently known as P. falcifolia. Thunberg (1825a) recog-
nized nine species of which only one is currently main-
tained. His concept of P. glomerata, P. ericoides and
Lachnaea conglomerata were completely incorrect and
caused confusion right up to the present study. Meisner
(1840; 1857: 563-565) redefined the genus by clarifying 92
‘species exclusae’ which were mostly synonymous with
Bothalia33.I (2003)
61
Other cosmopolitan genera in the Thymelaeaceae and he
retained only four species and six subspecies. The distribu-
tion of the remaining species clearly indicated that
Passerina was a smaller genus, largely confined to southern
Africa. At the beginning of the 20th centui7, Wright (1915)
revised the Thymelaeaceae for the Flora capensis and his
generic concept of Passerina was mostly based on that of
Meisner ( 1857). He recognized ten species, of which three
were new, as well as three subspecies. He recognized P. eri-
coides and Chymococca empetroides. We agree with
Thoday ( 1924a) that C. empetroides is a synonym of P. eri-
coides. Although Thoday (1924a) provided a much
improved classification of the group, the circumscription
and identification of several species remained problematic,
especially in the herbarium. Table 1 is a summai'y of taxa
recognized in the most comprehensive works on Passerina
from Linnaeus (1753) to the present study.
In his treatment of Passerina, Meisner (1840) divided
the genus into section I. Pentamerae and section II.
Tetramerae. P.polycepliala E.Mey., P. anthylloides L.f and
P. calocephala Meisn., with pentamerous flowers (section
I), were eventually all placed in the genus Gnidia (Meisner
1857; Gilg 1894a). Meisner (1857) did not divide Passerina
into infrageneric taxa, a pattern followed by all subsequent
treatments and no further mention was made of the relevant
sections. In the present genus treatment the sectional classi-
fication is not maintained.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Material from the following herbaria was studied (acro-
nyms according to Holmgren et al. 1990); BM, BOL,
BREM, C, GRA, K. LINN, M, MEL, MO, NBG, P, PR,
PRC, PRE, PRU, S, SBT, TCD, UPS, W, WU. A data-
base of the specimens was compiled on the Microsoft
Access Relational Database Management System for
Windows, Version 2.0.
Live and preserved (dried and in liquid preservatives)
material of all the species and subspecies in Passerina
was studied. As far as possible, material was collected
from at least five different localities for every taxon.
Illustrations were made from herbarium material by
means of a drawing tube. Measurements were taken
using a dissection microscope and a calibrated eyepiece.
Because the laminas of most leaves and floral bracts are
cymbiform or rolled, the depth was measured, with
dimensions indicated as length x depth.
Light microscopy (LM) was used for general leaf anato-
my, epidermal studies and floral anatomy (Bredenkamp &
Van Wyk 1999, 2001a, 2001b). Leaf and floral material
was fixed and stored in a 0. 1 M phosphate-buffered solu-
tion at pH 7.4, containing 2.5% formaldehyde, 0.1% glu-
taraldehyde and 0.5% caffeine [modified Kamovsky fixa-
tive; Kamovsky (1965)]. The material was washed in
water, dehydrated and embedded in glycol methacrylate
(GMA) following the methods of Eeder & O’Brien (1968).
Embedded material was serially sectioned. Sections were
stained in toluidine blue ‘O’, subjected to the periodic acid-
Schiff’s (PAS) reaction and mounted in Entellan (Art.
7961, E. Merck, Darmstadt).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to
study the epidermal surface features (including epicuti-
cular waxes) and to verify the structure of the cuticle
(Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2000).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used
for the study of the structure of mucilaginous epidermal
cell walls in Passerina (Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 1999).
Terminology used in the descriptions of inflores-
cences and flowers is mentioned in Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk (2001b). General descriptive terminology follows
Steam (1973) and Radford etcd. (1974). Author citations
follow Brummitt & Powell (1992).
Passerina L. Species plantarum: 559 ( 1753); L.: 168
(1754); P.J.Bergius: 126 (1767); Mill.: ( 1768); Burm.f: 12
(1768); L.: 236 (1771); L.: 225 (1782); L.: 374 (1784);
Thunb.: 75 (1794); J.C.Wendl.; 18 (1798); Willd.: 429
(1799); Poir.: 39 (1804): Lam. & DC.: 359 (1805); Wikstr.:
319 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825a); Meisn.: 390 (1840);
Steud.: 273 (1841); C.A.Mey.; 45 (1843); Meisn.: 561
(1857); Harv.; 325 (1868); Gand.: 418 (1913); C.H. Wright:
9 (1915); Thoday: 146 (1924a); Marloth: 214 (1925);
Domke: 137 (1934); Palmer & Pitman: 1583 (1972);
Coates Palgrave: 648 (1977); Bond & Goldblatt: 432
(1984); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 182 (1987); Goldblatt &
Manning: 683 (2000). Type species: Passerina fdiformis L.
Sananmnda [Clus.: 89 (1601); L.: 146 (1737)] Adans.:
258 (1763); Lam. & DC: 359 (1805); Raf: 104 (1836).
Type species: as above.
Tliymelaea [Toum.: 594 (1719); L.: 146 (1737)] Adans.:
258 (1763); Juss.: 77 (1789); Lam. & DC.: 359 (1805).
Type species: Daphne laureola L.
Passerine Lam. & DC.: 359 (1805) orth. var.
Balendasia Raf: 105(1836). Type species: B. ericoides
(Burm.f.) Raf
Steiroctis Raf: 105 (1836). Type species: not desig-
nated (Parr et al. 1979).
Trimeiandra Raf: 105 (1836). Type species: T. spicata
Raf. nom. illeg.
Lonchostoma obtusiflorum Wikstr. nom illeg. = Pas-
serina pentandra Thunb. (Parr et al. 1979) s Loncho-
stoma Wikstr.: 350 (1818) nom. cons.
Chymococca Meisn.: 565 (1857); Harv.: 325 (1868);
Benth. & Hook.: 194 (1880); Thoday: 166 (1924a). Type
species: C. empetroides Meisn.
Passerina L. Sectio Pentamerae Meisn.: 390 (1840).
Type species: not designated.
Passerina L. Sectio Tetramerae Meisn.: 395 (1840).
Type species: not designated.
= the identity sign denoting nomenclatural synonymy for
names based on the same type species.
TABLE 1. — A summary of taxa in the most comprehensive works on Passehna from Linnaeus ( 1753) to the present study
62
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
OU Ly
d,
(2 Q, Q, 3 3
cy cL
g b
: N
! I
i J "So
I Li < M Cy
S ^ 5
E
a. E
(U d-f
.>1
2 2
> >
J J
cii cC
S "Bo
o 'ir
8^
0-i ^
s
a: “
Li 'S
'■B
3 ai Q-
'M
o ^
^ —
^ lS
CO.
I-
c2
E
E 8
o .
’hfi
*2 '-v
S
d ^
<U ^
d S ^
(U (U
^-8
3 H
3 ^
■a 3
1 ^
u 21
■a S
■= j j=
a 7; c
g I f|
6 2? S
o 5
"bi) 8
R “L a;
^ ^ ?N
8
'S ^ a m
Co ^
cC ^
II II
TABLE I . — A summary of taxu in the most comprehensive works on Passerimi from Linnaeus ( 1 753) to the present study (cont. )
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
63
*The complete list of excluded species described by Meisner (1857: 563) was not included in Table 1 as most names are dealt with under ‘Excluded names’.
64
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Shiubs or small trees. Stems greyish brown; bark tough
and stringy. Leaves decussate, imbricate on young branch-
lets, sessile, closely appressed to stem or spreading at an
angle of 5-20°(-60°), cymbifomi (boat-shaped), falcate or
cigar-shaped; plane shape lineai; oblong, lanceolate or nar-
rowly trullate; base sessile or cuneate; apex tmncate and
hump-backed, obtuse, rounded, acuminate or acute to almost
spine-tipped; margins sometimes ciliate; length x depth
( 1.5-)2.5-4.0(-8.0) X (0.8-)1.2-2.0(-3.0) mm (leaf shape
usually cymbifomi, depth of lamina is distance from adaxial
groove to main vein situated abaxially); lamina inversely eri-
coid, adaxial surface concave, tomentose, abaxial surface
convex, glabrous, seldom tomentose. Inflorescences com-
prising polytelic synflorescences [apex of main florescence
(main axis) not temiinating with a flower (indetenninate),
co-florescences (lateral branches) of the same structure |;
main florescences as well as co-florescences spicate; spikes^
reduced, resembling terminal subcapitulate inflorescences,
each chaiacterized by two terminal leaves with axillary
blind-ending mdimentary flowers, enveloping minute grow-
ing point, proliferating growth (inflorescence apex grow-
ing out and returning to vegetative growth) less common
(Figures 1 , 3, 4), or spikes mostly extended, number of spikes
reduced or multiflowered, main and co-florescences present,
proliferating growth common (Figures 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 20,
23). Bracts enveloping flowers and fruits, largest after anthe-
sis of flowers, becoming more coriaceous and rounded at
fmit set, decussate, imbricate, cymbiforTn or helmet-shaped;
plane shape oblong, lanceolate, ovate and obovate to widely
ovate and obovate, rhombic and narrowly obtrullate to
obtrullate; base sessile, cuneate; main vein strongly devel-
oped, often keeled, extending to form a leaf-like point in
many species; apex obtuse, rounded or acute; texture mostly
coriaceous; lamina with adaxial surface (inside) concave,
abaxial surface (outside) convex, outside usually glabrous,
inside base or midrib tomentose or completely tomentose,
coriaceous or charlaceous, rrtgose or smooth, ± succulent or
thin, sometimes ± 3-5-ribbed, reticulately veined or ribbed
and reticulately veined on each side of main vein; wings
absent or bullate, cor iaceous, charlaceous or membranous;
margins often ciliate to setose; size variable, bracts without
leaf-like point, length x depth (2.5-)3.5^.5(-5.5) x (0.9-)
1 .0-1 .5(-2.4) mm or bracts with leaf-like point, length x
depth (4.0-)5.1-6.3(-7.3) x ( 1 .4— )1 .5-2.0(-2.6) mm.
Flowers actinomor'phic, hypogynoirs. Floral envelope
constituting hypanthium and sepals, (4.0-)5.3-7.3(-8.4)
mm long, membranous during pollination and yellowish
in P. rigida, P. paleacea, P. nivicola and P. esterhiiyse-
niae, slightly succulent and gr'eenish in P. ericoides,
mostly yellow-pink in all other species, dehydrated after
shedding of pollen, becoming papyraceous or coria-
ceous, yellow-pink tones turning red. Pedicel ver'y shor1
or absent. Receptacle very shorl. Hypanthium a membra-
nous to coriaceous cylindric lube (fused calyx and
androecium, differentiating into sepals and diplostemo-
nous androecium ar ising from hypanthium rim at separa-
tion of sepals, Figur'e I ); indumentum var iable in densi-
ty, trichornes nonglandular, uniseriate, often spiralled,
whitish, density of indumentum at ovary ranging from
glabrous to tomentose or slrigose; neck (narrowed tube
between apex of ovar-y and sepals) (().3-)().6-2.6(-3.0)
nmi long, density of indumentum ranging IVom glabrous
to tomentose on outside, inside often hairy, abscission
tissue not macroscopically discer nable, arliculation plane
absent, after fruiting fragmentation of neck base caused
by dehydration and torsification of tissue, sepals and an-
droecium being shed in most species. Sepals 4, petaloid,
imbricate in bud, flexed in flower, often setose with up to
5 long trichornes on outer surface and glabrous to tomen-
tose on inner surface; outer sepals cymbifomi or con-
cave; inner sepals oblong, elliptic or obovate. Corolla
absent. Disc absent. Androecium dimorphic diplostemo-
nous, arising from hypanthium at separation point of
sepals; filaments of antipetalous whori (0.4— )0.7-l.2(-l.5)
mm long, those of antisepalous whorl ( l.2-)l.4— 2.2(-2.4)
mm long; anthers (0.5-)0.7-0.9(-l.l) x (0.2-)0.3-0.4(-0.7)
mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular, exserted,
extrorse. Ovary superior, ( 1 .6-)2.0-2.5 (-2.7) x (0.5-)0.6-l .4
(-1.7) mm, bicarpellate during embryonic stage (Bun-
niger 1972), pseudomonomerous (Heinig 1951 ) at matu-
rity, placentation parietal, uniloculate, with I pendulous
ovule laterally attached near top of ovary; style separat-
ing laterally from top of ovary, maintaining lateral posi-
tion in hypanthium neck, reaching beyond hypanthium
rim; stigma ± globose, mop-like or penicillate (wind pol-
lination). Fruit enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged
hypanthium fragmented at neck base or, in some species,
fragmenting over widest circumference of fruit, the frag-
mented hypanthium, sepals and androecium being shed;
in P. ericoides and P. rigida a fleshy, l-seeded berry, 5.3
X 4 mm; in all other species an achene, pericarp mem-
brafious and dry, 2.5 x 1 .2 mm. Seed broadly fusiform
with outgrowths at both micropylar and funicular ends,
2.2(-2.9) X 1 .2(-l.6) mm; legmen black and shiny, often
with white spots; endosperm formation nuclear, but later
becoming cellular throughout.
Diagnostic characters: plants of Passerina are
shrubs or small trees, distinguished by the inversely eri-
coid leaves, that are inverse-dorsiventral in c/s. The in-
florescences are few- to multiflowered, simple or com-
pound spikes, often reduced, artificially resembling ter-
minal subcapitulate inflorescences. Each flower is
enveloped by a conspicuous bract, becoming more cori-
aceous and rounded at fruit set. The flowers are adapted
to wind pollination. During pollination the flower colour
is yellow-pink, the four petaloid sepals are flexed and
the anthers are exserted and extrorse (unique for Thy-
melaeaceae in southern Africa). All anthers open explo-
sively and the pollen is shed at once. The stigma is mop-
like. The fruit is enveloped by a persistent, loosely
arranged hypanthium. Because of the absence of an
articulation plane, the hypanthium fragments at neck
base or, in some species, over the widest circumference
of the fruit, the fragmented hypanthium, sepals and
androecium being shed. P. ericoides and P. rigida are
characterized by a fleshy, l-seeded berry and all other
species by an achene.
Etymology: Passerina refers to the Latin passer (= a
sparrow) as the seeds resemble a sparrow’s beak.
Common names: the vernacular name 'sparrow-wort’
was suggested by Miller ( 1 768) for all Passerina species
and Wendland (1 798) used the name fadenfdrmige
Vogelkopf. According to Smith ( 1 966) gonna is a collec-
tive name once used by the Khoekhoe for various mem-
bers of Thymelaeaceae, e.g. several species of Passerina
and Strnthiola.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
65
Uses: many Passeriiui species grow on sand dunes
and in sandy areas, with parts of the woody stem subter-
raneous, forming runners and developing an extended
root system. Most of these plants are pioneers and
resprouters, increasing their chances of survival in dis-
turbed areas. These plants are excellent sand binders and
are suitable for binding problematic sandy areas, espe-
cially after the clearing of invader species. Sim (1919)
recommended Passerina in his list of trees and shrubs for
coastal areas exposed to sea winds. Certain Passerina
species such as P. falcifolia are small trees and can be
used as ornamental garden plants. P. filiformis has been
cultivated in Britain and Europe since the time of
Linnaeus. P. obtusifolia is used in the wild flower indus-
try in the Robertson area. The bark is exceedingly tough
and is used for tying down thatch. According to Watt &
Breyer-Brandwijk (1962) it is also plaited into whip
thongs and used as twine. Members of the genus are not
browsed by stock as the plants are apparently unpalatable
(Story 1952). Ash from Passerina obtusifolia was tradi-
tionally used by the people of Genadendal in Western
Cape in the home industry of soap-making. Although
certain species have been recorded in cancer research,
these plants are not cun'ently known for their medicinal
value.
Flowering and fruiting: most Passerina species
flower profusely in spring, from September to October.
During this season the Cape Floristic Region is quite
windy and large amounts of pollen are produced, as
Passerina is wind-pollinated. Pollen is often wafted
away in clouds, causing a kind of hay-fever in sensitive
persons (Marloth 1925). Fruiting time is mostly from
December to January. The fleshy fruits of P. ericoides
and P. rigida are dispersed by birds or rodents inhabiting
the distribution ranges of these species along the South
African coast. Fruits of P. truncata subsp. truncata,
growing in the Karoo, passively fall to the ground, where
they are probably dispersed by ants or rodents. The fruits
of P. montana, occurring along the Great Escarpment.
are probably dispersed by birds as they are arranged at
the tips of branchlets, exposed, red, and beak-like, possi-
bly resembling the beaks of nestlings.
Distribution and ecology: in Passerina the highest
number of species per grid (nine) occurs in each of the
grids 3321 (Ladismith), 3322 (Oudtshoorn) and 3419
(Caledon). The highest diversity of species (six) occurs
in the False Bay area, from Seekoeivlei, including the
Cape Flats, to De Mond at the Palmiet River (341 8B).
After an extensive study of herbarium material in co-
operation with field work. Western Cape is regarded as
the centre of diversity for Passerina, from where certain
species extend west, north and east.
Thoday ( 1925) published an account of the geograph-
ical distribution and ecology of Passerina, based on 15
species. Of the 20 species currently studied, 10 are
endemic and 4 species are near-endemic to the Cape
Floristic Region. P. obtusifolia is widespread in the
Northern, Eastern and Western Cape, whereas P. corym-
bosa occurs in Western and Eastern Cape, with outliers
in KwaZulu-Natal. P. rigida is distributed from Western
Cape, along the coast to northern KwaZulu-Natal; all
these species are endemic to the southern African
provinces in which they occur. P. drakensbergensis is
endemic to the Bergville District in KwaZulu-Natal.
P. inontivaga is found from Mossel Bay and Oudtshoorn
to Eastern Cape and along the escarpment northwards to
Zimbabwe and P. montana is distributed from the east-
ern mountains and Great Escaipment of southern Africa
to Zimbabwe and Mozambique. P. montivaga and
P. montana are near-endemic to the Great Escarpment.
Consen’ation status: with the exception of Passerina
esterhuyseniae (from the northern Cederberg Mountains)
known from herbarium material only, all other species
and subspecies of Passerina were studied in the wild.
Assessments were done using the guidelines of the lUCN
Species Survival Commission (2000) and Victor (2002).
Key to species
la Inflorescences comprising terminal subcapitulate spikes; proliferating growth (inflorescence apex growing out
and returning to vegetative growth) uncommon (Figures 1, 3. 4):
2a Floral envelope yellow and membranous, up to 4 mm long, neck (portion of hypanthium between ovary and
sepals) very short, ± 0.3 mm long; bracts widely ovate, wings membranous and obscurely veined
\. P. puleacea
2b Floral envelope yellow-pink and papyraceous, 4. 9-6. 4 mm long, neck 0.7- 1.4 mm long; bracts variously
shaped, wings present or absent;
3a Leaves narrowly oblong to oblong; base sessile, dilated; apex truncate, or truncate to rounded, keeled, often
appearing humped on the back (abaxially) 2. P. truncata
3b Leaves linear-lanceolate; base diamond-shaped to rounded; apex rounded to acute;
4a Abaxial surface of young leaves tomentose; bracts ovate to widely ovate; lamina comose on inside, sparsely
hairy to tomentose on outside, ± 3-ribbed on each side of main vein, coriaceous and rugose; length x depth
(4.5- )4. 9 X 1.5(-L8) mm (leaf shape usually cymbiform, depth of lamina is distance from adaxial
groove to main vein situated abaxially) 3. P. qiuidrifaria
4b Abaxial surface of young leaves glabrous; bracts ovate to obovate; lamina villous on inside, glabrous on
outside, obscurely ribbed on each side of main vein, thinly coriaceous; length x depth (3.2-)4.0 x
0.9(-L6) mm 4. P. montana
lb Inflorescences comprising extended spikes, number of spikes often reduced, or many compound, multiflowered
spikes present; proliferating growth common (Figures 10. 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23);
5a Inflorescences reduced, often to solitary spikes; dwarf shrubs up to 300 mm high; bracts rhombic, dark green
when fresh, dark brown in dried specimens, coriaceous, membranous wings absent 5. P. hiirchellii
5b Inflorescences with multiflowered main and co-florescences; low shrubs, shrubs or small trees; bracts various-
ly coloured, textured and winged;
6a Fruit fleshy; floral envelope greenish or yellow, coriaceous or membranous; leaves greyish green:
7a Fruit a red berry; floral envelope greenish and coriaceous, hypanthium strigose; leaves oblong, apex obtuse
to subacute; bracts larger, oblong to lanceolate, leaf-like 6. P. ericoides
66
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
7b Fruit a bright yellow berry; floral envelope yellow and membranous, glabrous at ovary, tomentose at neck;
leaves narrowly lanceolate to ovate, apex acute with main vein visible as a blunt keel; bracts widely
ovate, apex acute 1 . P. rigidu
6b Fruit dry (an achene); floral envelope yellow, yellow-pink or red, membranous or papyraceous; leaves variously
coloured;
8a Floral envelope membranous, yellow or yellow-pink;
9a Floral envelope yellow or yellow-pink; bracts chartaceous, widely obovate, wings membranous, often
bullate, tinged red at margins 8. P. nivicola
9b Floral envelope yellow; bracts thinly chartaceous, smooth and helmet-shaped with membranous rims , .
9. P. esterhuyseniae
8b Floral envelope papyraceous, yellow-pink or red:
10a Young leaves and bracts abaxially sparsely hairy, becoming tomentose towards apex, older leaves rugose
or warty with bases of fallen hairs 10. P. comosa
10b Young leaves and bracts abaxially glabrous;
1 la Bracts shorter than 4.5 mm:
12a Bracts rhombic in outline, softly coriaceous, with membranous wings, margins brownish ciliate . . .
1 1 . P. pendula
12b Bracts oblate in outline, chartaceous, with bullate membranous wings, margins glabrous
12 P. galpinii
11b Bracts longer than 4.5 mm: ^
13a Floral envelope ± 5.9 mm long; outer and inner sepals concave and lanceolate; bracts larger than
leaves, bracts and leaves lanceolate and glaucous 13. P. drakensbergensis
13b Floral envelope 6.0-8.4 mm long; outer and inner sepals variously shaped; bracts not as above, variously
shaped and coloured;
14a Midrib of bract shortly extended into an acute apex, lamina rhombic to obtrullate, distinctly angled,
4- or 5-ribbed; leaves with a distinct midrib, laterally compressed, greyish green, drying greyish
brown 14. P. corymbose/
14b Midrib of bract extending beyond lamina into a leaf-like point, lamina variously shaped and
ribbed; leaves with a distinct midrib, or midrib less obvious, abaxially convex or laterally com-
pressed, variously coloured:
15a Bracts with leaf-like point, obtuse at apex, lamina closely 2-ribbed at margin; hypanthium fragments
at circumference of ovary 15. P. obtusifolia
15b Bracts with leaf-like point variously shaped, but not obtuse, lamina (faintly ribbed in P. dnikens-
bergensis) extending into a membranous margin; hypanthium fragments at neck base;
16a Adaxial (inner) surface of bracts basally to centrally setose or tomentose over entire length of
midrib; wings glabrous;
17a Bracts with midrib and leaf-like point stout and strongly developed, apex acute
1 6. P. paludosa
17b Bracts with midrib forming a straight or filiform, leaf-like point, or midrib shortly extended;
18a Bracts with leaf-like point straight or slightly incurved; wings of bracts ovate, margins hairy
in distal half, or obtrullate, narrowing abruptly into midrib 17. P. moiitivaga
18b Bracts with leaf-like point shortly extended or extended into a filiform, slightly falcate
point; wings of bracts ovate-acuminate, gradually narrowing to a point or widely obovate,
narrowing abruptly into midrib 18. P . f/Ufon/zis
16b Adaxial (inner) surface of bracts completely villous:
19a Bracts with midrib extended, leaf-like point falcate; wings of bracts ± 4-ribbed; hypanthium
neck ± 3 mm long, tomentose, often arcuate; spikes lax, often arcuate, mottled grey-green,
with up to 16 fertile, enlarged bracts 19. P.falcifolia
19b Bracts with midrib shortly extended into a short point, apex acute; wings of bracts ± 5-ribbed;
hypanthium neck ± 2 mm long, glabrous to sparsely pubescent; spikes robust, rigid and
extended, glaucous, with up to 30 fertile, enlarged bracts 20. P. rubra
1 . Passerina paleacea Wikstr. in Kunglinga Svenska
Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 39: 323 (1818); Meisn.;
400 (1840); Meisn.; 562 (1857); C.H.Wright; 12 (1915);
Thoday: 164 (1924a); Thoday: 388 (1924b). Type: Caput
bonae Spei, Herb. Wikstromii, Speurmtm s.n. (S!, lecto.,
here designated; UPS!).
Lx/cimaea paleacea Herb. Banks, ined,, fide Wikstr.; 324 (1818);
Meisn.: 562 ( 1857); C.H.Wright: 12 (1915); Thoday; 164 ( 1924a). nom.
inval. in synonymy.
Passerii/a glo/nerata sensu Thunb.: 374 (1825a) pro parte quoad
specim. Herb. Thimherg 9596D, 9579.
L. congUm/erala L. sensu Thunb.; 374 (1825a) pro parte quoad
spccim. Herb. Thiu/berg 9596D.
P. ericoides sensu Thunb.: 374 (1825a) pro parte quoad specim.
Herb. Thu/iberg 9596D, 9579, non L.; P. ericoides sensu Meisn.: 401
(1840) pro parte, non L.; Meisn.; 562 (1857) pro parte quoad spccim.
Dreges./i. (G!, K!, P!, S!).
Shrubs or shrublets 0. 1-1.5 m high. Stems branching
from base up to growing points, branchlets from previous
growth persistent, arcuate, indurate; younger branchlets
ascending, densely white-tomentose, villous closer to
growing points; shredded bark of older branchlets grey-
ish brown, remains of tomentum forming lengthwise
strips; leaf scars conspicuous; older stems fissured
lengthwise exposing greyish white sclerenchyma fibres;
internodes shorter than leaves. Leaves imbricate on
young branchlets, closely appressed to stem, diverging at
an angle of ± 0-5°, cymbiform, often expanding, becom-
ing thickly chartaceous and bract-like towards inflores-
cences; lamina inversely ericoid, adaxial surface con-
cave, tomentose, abaxial surface laterally compressed
and glabrous, plane shape linear to linear lanceolate,
length X depth 1 .5-2.5(-4.0) x 0.6-0.8(-1.2) mm; base
sessile, dilated; apex acute, median vein forming a dis-
tinct keel incurved at apex; margins involute. Inflores-
cences subcapitulate, ± ellipsoid. Bracts decussate, im-
bricate, sessile, appressed, widely ovate in outline, length
X depth (2.5-)2.7 x 1.2(-1.9) mm; lamina adaxially (in-
side) concave and villous, abaxially (outside) convex and
glabrous, thickly chartaceous, smooth on each side of
main vein, concolorous, greyish green, senescing to yellow-
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
67
FIGURE 1. — Passerina paleacea,
Bredenkamp 960. A, spike
reduced, resembling terminal
•subcapitulate inflorescence;
B. leaf; C. bract; D, Bower
clasped by bract in ventral
view; E. liypanthium frag-
menting at circumference of
ovary. F-H, achene; envelop-
ed by membranous pericarp;
G. lateral view; H. ventral
view. h. hypanthium; s, sepa-
ls. Scale bars; 2 mm. Artist;
A. Stabler.
ish brown; base cuneate; main vein extending into obtuse
apex; wings membranous, borders glabrous, obscurely
veined. Floral envelope membranous and yellow during
pollination, dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning
red to brownish, ± 4.2 mm long. Hypanthium glabrous,
neck ± 0.3 mm. long, abscission tissue and articulation
plane absent. Sepals concave, elliptic or subrotund and
glabrous. Androeciiun with filaments of antipetalous
whorl ± 0.7 mm and antisepalous whorl ± 1.4 mm long;
anthers 0.6 x 0.5 mm. Ovary 2.4 x 1 .4 mm. Fruit an ach-
ene with pericarp membranous and dry, ± 2.3 x 1.2 mm,
enveloped by persistent, loosely ananged hypanthium
fragmenting over widest circumference of fruit, the frag-
mented hypanthium, sepals and androedum being shed.
Figure 1.
Nomenclatural notes: in the latter half of the eighteenth
century Lachnaea conglomerata L. (1753), Passerina
ericoides L. (1753) and P. glomerata Thunb. (1794) were
constantly confused by botanists, causing Wikstrom
(1818; 322) to place P. glomerata and L. conglomerata
in the synonymy of P. conglomerata Thunb. In the same
publication Wikstrom delimited and described P. paleacea.
However, P. paleacea is not mentioned in Thunberg’s
revision of 1825, in which he described P. glomerata
occurring in ‘Hautbay’, the currently known locality of
both P. paleacea and P. ericoides. This confusion is re-
flected on many herbarium specimens, e.g. the specimen
Herb. Thunherg 9579, bearing the inscriptions P. eri-
coides, P. glomerata (struck out) and the word ‘paleacea’
written in pencil. Although Thoday (1924b) cho.se the
specimen Herb Thunberg 9597 as the type of P. paleacea,
this specimen was not chosen as lectotype in the present
study, as the Sparrman specimen cited by Wikstrom
(1818; 324) was located at S. The specimen LINN 504.3,
positively identified as P. paleacea, bears the inscription
‘sp 161’, possibly referring to Spairman. However, there
will always be doubt whether it is a duplicate of the
Sparrman specimen cited by Wikstrom.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
paleacea may easily be confused with P. rigida, as both
occur on sand dunes along the coast. The branches of P.
rigida are nodding and abundantly covered by pendulous
branchlets, spikes are extended and the fruits are fleshy,
yellow berries. Plants of P. paleacea are less robust,
reaching a maximum height of 1.5 m, and are character-
ized by an abundance of subcapitulate inflorescences and
dry fruit. The subcapitulate inflorescences at times led to
the confusion of P. paleacea with P. truncata (= P.
glomerata), but, these two species are morphologically
as well as geographically distinct. P. paleacea has a mari-
time habit and P. truncata is distributed from Vanrhyns-
dorp, along the Cederberg Mountains, to Malmesbury,
Ceres, Tulbagh and Matjiesfontein up to Seven Weeks
Poort. The earlier confusion between P. paleacea and
P. ericoides was probably due to their sympatric occur-
rence, but these two species are moiphologically quite
different.
Etymology: the Latin specific epithet paleacea (= chaffy)
probably refers to the chaff-like subcapitulate inllores-
cences.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina paleacea occurs
in both the Southwestern and the Agulhas Plain Centres
of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) (Goldblatt & Man-
ning 2000) and is a typical fynbos element. It grows on
coastal dunes and in maritime habitats from Lange-
baan, round the Cape Peninsula to the Cape Flats, Kogel
Bay, Hermanus, Gansbaai, De Hoop, the Potberg coast,
Bredasdorp, Arniston, Vermaaklikheid and Puntjie up
to Stilbaai (Figure 2). The vegetation types dune fyn-
bos and dune thicket form a mosaic along many parts
68
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of
Passerina pateacea, •; P. tnm-
cata subsp. tnmcata, ■.
of the southern Cape coast (Lubke 1998a, 1998b;
Lubke & Van Wijk 1998). This same distribution pat-
tern is displayed by P. paleacea as it is found in the
dune scrub, amongst typical fynbos species, but not in
the dune thicket amongst larger shrubs or small trees
with mesophytic leaves such as species of Chry-
sanlhemoides, Mimusops, Morelia, Rhus and Sideroxy-'
Ion.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
2. Passerina truncata (Meisn. ) Bredenk. & A.E.van
Wyk in Bothalia 32: 66 (2002a). Type: Western Cape, near
Tulbagh Waterfall, April 1865, Zeyher 43 (K!, lecto.;
MEL!, MO!, NBG!, S!, W!).
The complete description of the species and sub-
species, the synonymy, relationships, etymology, distrib-
ution, habitat and key to subspecies is dealt with in
Bothalia 32: 66-71 (2002).
2a. subsp. truncata (Figures 2, 3)
Conseri’ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
2b. subsp. monticola Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk
Conserx’ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
3. Passerina quadrifaria Bredenk. 8i A.E.van Wyk
in South African Journal of Botany 68: 304 (2002b).
Type: Eastern Cape, 3324 (Steytlerville): Uitenhage District,
Great Winterhoek Mountains, Cockscomb, (-BD), rocky
ridge, 30 Nov. 1958, Esterhuysen 28006 (PRE, holo.!;
BOL!, K!).
Passerina sp. nov. 3 Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 70
(2000); Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 56 (2001a); Bredenk.
& A.E.van Wyk: 217 (2001b).
The complete description of the species, relationships,
etymology, distribution and habitat appear in the South
African Journal of Botany 68: 304-307 (2002).
Conserx’ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
4. Passerina montana Thoday in Bulletin of Mis-
cellaneous Information, Kew 4: 152 (1924a); Norl. &
Weim.: 630 (1958); Bond & Goldblatt: 432 (1984);
Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 182 (1987). Type: Mooi River, Wood
FIGURE 3. — Passerina truncata
subsp. truncata. Bredcnkamp
985. A, spike reduced, re-
sembling terminal subcapilu-
late inllorescence; B, bract;
C, leaf; D, flower clasped by
bract, fragmenting at circum-
ference of ovary. E, F, ache-
ne: E, clasped by bract; F,
enveloped by membranous
pericarp. Scale bars; 2 mm.
Artist: A. Stadler.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
69
4036 [K!, lecto., designated by Thoday 10: 387 (1924b);
BOL!, GRA!, PRE!].
P. ericoides sensu Meisn.: 401 (1840) pro parte, non L.; Meisn.:
562 (1857) pro parte; C.H. Wright: 12 (1915), pro parte.
P. rigida Wikstr. var. tetragona Meisn.: 563 (1857) pro parte quoad
specim., circa Stormberg Drege s.n.
Small trees or shrubs, (0.2-)1.0-2.0(-2.5) m high. Stems
branching from base up to growing points, young stems
profusely branched, young branchlets ascending; branch-
lets terminally leafless and woolly, with conspicuous ter-
minal scars after dispersal of fruit; bark greyish brown,
younger branchlets densely white-tomentose, villous
closer to growing points; bark on older branchlets shred-
ding, greyish brown, remains of tomentum forming length-
wise strips; leaf scars conspicuous; older stems fissured
lengthwise exposing greyish white sclerenchyma fibres;
intemodes mostly shorter than leaves. Leaves imbricate
on young branchlets, closely appressed to stem, diverg-
ing at an angle of ± 0-5°, cymbiform, lamina inversely
ericoid, adaxial surface concave, tomentose, abaxial sur-
face laterally compressed and glabrous, plane shape lin-
ear to lanceolate, length x depth 1.5-2.5(-4.0) x 0. 6-0.8
mm; base sessile, dilated; apex acute, median vein
prominent in upper third of leaf, incurved at apex; mar-
gins involute. Inflorescences subcapitulate, ± ellipsoid.
Bracts decussate, imbricate, sessile, appressed, ovate to
obovate in outline, length x depth (3.2-)4.0 x 0.9(-1.6
mm); lamina adaxially (inside) concave and villous,
abaxially (outside) convex and glabrous, thinly coria-
ceous, obscurely ribbed, yellowish green, margins of
fruiting bracts turning red; base sessile; main vein
extending into subacute apex; wings membranous,
brownish. Floral envelope papyraceous and yellow-pink
during pollination, dehydrated after shedding of pollen,
turning red to brownish, ± 5.8 mm long. Hypanthinm
glabrous at ovary, neck tomentose, ±0.8 mm long, frag-
mentation at neck base. Sepals: outer sepals cymbiform,
adaxially scantilly tomentose, abaxially glabrous; inner
sepals obovate, adaxially tomentose, abaxially glabrous.
Androeciurn with filaments of antipetalous whorl
± 0.6 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 1.5 mm
long; anthers ± 0.8 x 0.4 mm. Ovary ± 2.1 x 0.6 mm.
Fruit an achene enveloped in beak-like, reddish, papyra-
ceous hypanthium, fragmented at neck base; pericarp
membranous and dry, ± 2.3 x 1.2 mm. Figure 4.
Nomenclatural notes: according to the concept of
Wright (1915), P. ericoides is not only distributed along
the southern coast of Western Cape (present interpreta-
tion), but also along the coast to Eastern Cape and further
inland up to Mpumalanga. However, most of the inland
specimens cited by him have been classified as P. mon-
tana by Thoday (1924a). The interpretation of P. corym-
hosa by Wright (1915) posed the same problem, as Wood
4036 (the lectotype of P. montana) was also placed in
this taxon.
Meisner (1857) described P. rigida var. tetragona cit-
ing two Drege specimens, one from Ezelsbank and the
other from Stormberg. The Ezelsbank specimen {Drege
2971, P, K) is P. trimcata, but the Stormberg specimen
could not be located. According to Gunn & Codd (1981),
Drege crossed the Stormberg (3126BC, Queenstown) on
17 December 1832. The first author suspected that the
Drege specimen would be P. montana, as it is common
in this area. This suspicion is supported by Sim 68 (from
the Pirie Mountains in the King William’s Town District),
a syntype of P. montana, bearing the inscription ‘P. rigida
WW^-tetragona' and the Drege specimen from Storm-
berg is consequently regarded as P. montana.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Hilliard &
Burtt (1988) noted two rather distinct forms of P. mon-
tana in KwaZulu-Natal. The first form is characterized
by plants on rock platforms that are low, rounded bush-
es, 0.3-1 m high, with the tips of the branches erect,
whereas those of the second form inhabit valleys and are
riverside bushes of up to 2 m high, with open branches
and pendulous branchlets. The present study, taking the
whole distribution range of P. montana into considera-
tion, recognizes two forms. One, centred in the God’s
Window area of Mpumalanga, are rounded shrubs 0.5-2
m high, with many branchlets covered with smaller, de-
cussate, imbricate leaves, bluish green in colour. The
second form dominates in the Free State, Lesotho,
KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape. These plants are more
robust, with open branches and larger, yellowish green
leaves and inflorescences, which are tinged pink.
However, the two forms are not geographically distinct
and intermediates are common. Both forms unequivocal-
ly show the specific characters and therefore we do not
propose to give them formal taxonomic recognition. Studies
FIGURE 4. — Passerina montana,
Bredenkump 893. A, spike
reduced, resembling terminal
subcapitulate inflorescence;
B. leaf; C, bract; D, flower
clasped by bract. E, F, ach-
ene: E, enveloped by mem-
branous pericarp; E, lateral
view. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Artist: A. Stadler.
70
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
of the leaf epidermis, anatomy and floral morphology
(Bredenkamp & Van Wyk 2000, 2001a, 2001b) supplied
no further evidence on which the two forms could be
delineated.
Etymology, the specific epithet is derived from the
Latin montanus (= pertaining to or growing on moun-
tains). This is a very appropriate epithet as P. montana is
distributed along the Great Escarpment from Eastern
Cape to Zimbabwe.
Common names: Cooper 2302 (K), from Lesotho, re-
ported the vernacular name Likhabei and Staples 17
(PRE), from the Maluti Mountains in Lesotho, recorded
the name Lekaphu. Story (1952) mentions the name
pakaan. Von Breitenbach et al. t2001) used the names
berg-gonna and mountain gonna.
Uses: information on the specimen Watt & Breyer-
Brandwijk 1851, collected at Thabaneng, states that the
plants are used medicinally. However, Watt & Breyer-
Brandwijk ( 1962) supplied no further details.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina montana is a
near-endemic to the Great Escarpment of southern Africa,
with distant satellite populations in high mountain areas
of Angola, Namibia and Limpopo [Northern Province],
South Africa. It is distributed from Nyanga in Zimbabwe,
along the escarpment to Manica and Sofala in Mozam-
bique, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Swaziland, KwaZulu-
Natal, Free State, Lesotho and the Eastern Cape (Figure
5). Outliers in Angola have been found on the escarp-
ment of the Huilla Plateau near Lubango and the Cheila
Mountains. Several specimens of this species have been
collected at Moltkeblick on the Auas Mountains in Nami-
bia. In Limpopo, P. montana is found in the Soutpansberg
area and on the Blouberg, as well as on the summit of
Krantzberg in the Waterberg Mountains. A single speci-
men (Goossens 375) was collected in the Pretoria
District, but the species is currently probably extinct in
this area, due to human impact.
FIGURE 5. — Known distribution of Passerina nunuana.
This species grows at altitudes of (900-)l 200-3 000 m.
At Nyanga, P. montana is associated with Erica niannii
and E. hexandra, bordering on Bracliystegia woodland and
montane forest. In Mozambique and South Africa it has
been found with Widdringtonia nodiflora and Erica
species, bordering on montane forest. It is common
amongst rocks on hills, mountain slopes, mountain tops,
cliff ledges and rocky ridges. It also frequents stream
courses and banks as well as riverbeds and banks, where
the growth form has been reported as a shrub amongst
rocks, a drooping bush over running water, a limply
spreading bush in sand or dense bushes. These plants also
grow in river valley forests and along plantations.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
5. Passerina burchellii Thoday in Bulletin of Mis-
cellaneous Information, Kew 4: 155 (1924a); Bond &
Goldblatt: 432 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning: 683 (2000).
Type; Cape, Caledon Div., mountain tops of Baviaans-
kloof near Genadendal, Biirchell 7761 [K, lecto.!, desig-
nated by Thoday: 387 (1924b); M!, P!].
P. tetragona Burch. MS. in Herb. Kew, non Steud. fide Thoday: 156
(1924a).
Low, erect, many-stemmed shrublets, branching mostly
on new growth, ± 0.3 m high, from a common rootstock.
Stems greyish brown, cork fissured, grey-brown, scabrous,
surrounding prominent leaf scars; indumentum at growing
point densely white-tomentose, flaking off with cork on
older branchlets, which become glabrous. Leaves imbri-
cate, overlapping ± 50%, diverging at an angle of 30°,
plane shape rhombic, length x depth 2.8(-3.5) x 1.5 mm,
adaxial surface concave, villous, abaxial surface convex,
glabrous; base sessile, cuneate; apex subacute, bearded;
margins brownish setose. Inflorescences with spikes
extended, number of spikes often reduced, spikes some-
times solitary, 6-12-flowered, arrangement subterminal,
axis white-tomentose, proliferating growth common.
Bracts appressed, rhombic, length x depth (3.2-)3.5 x 1.5
mm; lamina adaxially concave (inside), abaxially convex
(outside), villous inside, glabrous outside, coriaceous and
smooth, extending into a smooth wing, dark green when
fresh, dark brown in dried specimens; base cuneate; main
vein extending into acute, bearded apex; margins brown-
ish setose, involute. Eloral envelope ± 4.7 mm long,
papyraceous and yellow-pink during pollination, dehy-
drated after shedding of pollen, turning red to brown.
Hypanthium glabrous at ovary, neck tomentose, ± 0.8 mm
long. Sepals: outer sepals cymbiform, midrib adaxially
and apex abaxially setose; inner sepals obovate, adaxially
tomentose, apex abaxially setose. Androecium with fila-
ments of antipetalous whorl ± 0.7 mm and those of anti-
sepalous whorl ± 1 .5 mm long; anthers 0.5 x 0.3 mm, sub-
basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovary ± 1.6 x 0.6 mm.
Emit an achene, pericarp membranous and dry, ±2.5x1 .2
mm, enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthi-
um, breaking up at neck base due to dehydration and tor-
sification of tissue, resulting in sepals and androecium
being shed. Figure 6.
Nomenclatural notes: although Thoday (1924a) cited
P. rigida var. comosa Meisn. partly (ex MS. in Herb.
Kew) in synonymy under P. biirchellii, the specimens
cited by Meisner (1857) in the description of the var.
comosa all belong to P. pendida (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Thoday.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: bearded
sepals, leaves and bracts distinguish this species from P.
pendida.
Eponymy: this plant was named in honour of the
explorer and botanist W.J. Burchell, who collected in
Caledon and as far north as Tulbagh between 1810 and
1811. During this trip Burchell 7761, the lectotype of P.
biirchellii, was collected on the summit of the mountains
of Baviaanskloof near Genadendal.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina burchellii is en-
demic to the Southwestern and Langeberg Centres with-
in the CFR. It is common on mountain summits of the
Villiersdorp and Genadendal Districts (Figure 7), with
outliers on southeastern rocky slopes of Towerkop in the
Swartberg Mountains at Ladismith. This species occurs
at altitudes of 1 333-2 167 m, often covered in mist. It is
found in small groups on sandy loam, between boulders
and rocks on upper south- or southeast-facing slopes.
s: z mm.
Artist: A. Stadler.
Consen’ation status: Vulnerable ( VU D2) (Victor 2002)
because of small population size.
6. Passerina ericoides L., Systema naturae 12,2: 733
(1767); Bui-m.f.: 12 (1768); L.: 236 ( 1771 ); L.: 374 (1784);
Willd.: 430 (1799); Poir.: 41 (1804); Wikstr.: 325 (1818);
Meisn.: 401 (1840) pro parte minore; Steud.: 274 (1841);
C.A.Mey.: 49 (1843); Meisn.: 562 (1857) pro parte minore;
C.H.Wright: 12 (1915) pro parte; Thoday: 166 (1924a);
Bond & Goldblatt; 432 (1984); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 182
(1987); Goldblatt & Manning: 683 (2000). Type:
Passerina ericoides, Linnean Herbarium 504.5 [LINN,
lecto.!, designated by Thoday: 148 (1924a)].
Chvmococca empetroides Meisn.: 565 (1857); Harv.: 325 (1868);
Bolus &Wolley-Dod: 315 ( 1904); C.H.Wright: 15 ( 1915); Thoday: 166
( 1924a). P. fiUformis L. var. crassifolia Eckl. & Zeyh. fide Meisn.: 565
( 1857). Type: Eckl. & Ze\h. herb. no. 39 (G!, lecto., here designated;
BOL!, MO!. P!. W!).
P. glomerata sensu Meisn.: 562 (1857), non Thunb.: 75 (1794).
Lachnaea congloinerata L. sensu Meisn.: 562 ( 1857).
Low, rounded, many-stemmed shrublets, branching
profusely on new growth, 0.3-1. 2 m high, older branch-
FIGURE 7. — Known distribution of
Passerina burchellii. •; Passe-
rina ericoides, ■.
72
Bothalia33,l (2003)
lets indurate, young branchlets lax, often arcuate. Stems
light greyish brown, cork fissured lengthwise, grey-
brown, whitish scabrous, surrounding prominent leaf
scars; indumentum at growing point densely white
strigose, flaking off with cork on older branchlets, which
become glabrous. Leaves slightly succulent, imbricate,
overlapping ± 50%, diverging at an angle of 45°, plane
shape oblong, length x depth 2. 5-2. 8 x 0.6-0. 7 mm,
adaxial surface concave, villous, abaxial surface convex,
glabrous, greyish green, smooth; base sessile, dilated;
apex obtuse to subacute; margins glabrous, basally
sparsely setose. Inflorescences with spikes usually
extended, 6-12-flowered, arrangement subterminal, axis
white strigose, proliferating growth common. Bracts
spreading at an angle of 60° (flowering) or 90° (fruiting),
oblong to lanceolate, length x depth ± 3.6 x 1.5 mm;
lamina adaxially concave (inside), abaxially convex
(outside), villous inside, glabrous outside, smooth, wings
absent, greyish green, slightly succulent; base dilated;
apex obtuse to subacute; margins glabrous, basally
sparsely setose, involute. Floral envelope ± 5 mm long,
coriaceous and greenish during pollination, dehydrated
after shedding of pollen, turning red. Hypanthiiim ovate-
oblong at ovary, strigose, neck strigose, ± 0.6 mm long.
Sepals globose when young, concave, widely obovate,
outer and inner sepals adaxially puberulent, abaxially
glabrous. Androeciiim with filaments of antipetalous
whorl ± 0.5 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 1.3
mm long; anthers large, + 0.9 x 0.7 mm, subbasifixed, 2-
thecous and 4-locular. Ovary ±2.1 x 1.7 mm. Fruit a
fleshy red beiry, ± 5.3 x 4 mm, enveloped by persistent,
loosely arranged hypanthium, fragmenting over widest
circumference of fruit, the fragmented hypanthium,
sepals and androecium being shed. Seed ± 2.9 x 1.6 mm.
Noinenciatnral notes: in the Catalogue of the Lin-
naean Herbarium, Savage (1945) made the following
inscription ‘Tulb. list c. 1769. n.l. det. L. — Blaeria eri-
coides’. This refers to consignments of bulbs, seeds and
herbarium specimens that Rijk Tulbagh sent to Van
Royen, the Burmans at Amsterdam and Linnaeus at
Uppsala (Gunn & Codd 1981). Jackson (1917, 1918)
published a list of 203 of the specimens sent to Linnaeus
around 1769 and identified by him. The first inscription
on the list is the provisional name Blaeria ericoides,
which Savage (1945) believed to be the P. ericoides
specimen at LINN, but there is no numbering or any
other indication on the specimen to link it with Tulbagh’s
list (Jackson 1917-1918). As Linnaeus had already
described P. ericoides in 1767, the specimen at LINN is
probably not part of the Tulbagh collection. Thoday
(1924a) clearly regarded the specimen at LINN, named
by Linnaeus, as the type of P. ericoides. As no other origi-
nal elements exist, P. ericoides LINN 504.5 is regarded
as a lectotype designated by Thoday ( 1924a).
Thunberg ( 1825a) accepted Wikstrom’s concept of P.
glomerata, occurring at Hout Bay in the Cape, and cited
P. ericoides in synonymy, causing confusion about the
identity of the latter taxon. Meisner ( 1840) reinstated P.
ericoides, but the concept of this taxon became even
more doubtful in the light of the cited distribution. In
1 857 Meisner retained his concept of P. ericoides, occur-
ring at Uitenhage, Port Elizabeth, Witbergen and
Onderbokkeveld, and placed P. glomerata and Laclmaea
conglomerata in synonymy under P. ericoides. This revi-
sion by Meisner (1857) was largely followed by Wright
(1915). Because of his incorrect concept of the taxon,
Meisner ( 1 857) was confronted with material from Table
Bay and Standvallei with red berries, which he then
named Chymococca empetroides, based especially on
the fleshy fruit. Thoday (1924a) was justified in placing
this name in synonymy under P. ericoides, as the
descriptions of these taxa coincide and as the fleshy fruit
of C. empetroides is not unique, but is also found in
P. rigida. The concept of P. ericoides, occuning along
coastal dunes mainly in the Cape Peninsula and adjacent
coastal areas of the Western Cape, was clarified by
Thoday ( 1 924a) and is also accepted in the present study.
Diagnostic characters: Passerina ericoides is charac-
terized by greenish flowers, with a coriaceous, strigose
hypanthium and the fruits are fleshy red beiTies. The
leaves are greyish green and oblong, with an obtuse
apex. The bracts are leaf-like, larger and lanceolate.
Etymology: the specific epithet ericoides refers to the
ericoid appearance of this species indicated by the phrase
‘corollae tubus globosus, inflatus — unde et Ericam refert
flore’, which was used by Linnaeus (1767) in his origi-
nal description of the species.
Common names: Willdenow (1799) introduced the
vernacular name heideartiger Vogelkopf, and the com-
mon names ‘Christmas berry’ or dronkhessie were docu-
mented by Smith (1966).
Uses: Marloth (1925) remarked that P. ericoides was
laden with bright, scarlet fruits and that it was often
employed as a Christmas decoration. The juicy pulp has
a somewhat unpleasant taste, but appears to be harmless
(dronkhessie). As early as 1919, Sim recommended P.
ericoides as a useful shrub for planting in coastal areas
exposed to sea winds. This species occurs on coastal
dunes and on the banks of lagoons in the Cape Peninsula
and adjacent coastal areas of Western Cape. The plants
are excellent sand binders as they have an extensive root
system from which resprouting often takes place.
Because human impact and invasion of alien vegetation
along the coast of the Cape Peninsula are very high, reha-
bilitation and conservation of coastal dunes is of vital
importance. P. ericoides plants are ideally suited to com-
bat erosion of coastal dunes and can be used as a substi-
tute in coastal areas where alien vegetation is cleared. In
their research on the coastal erosion of the Milnerton
beaches, Biggs et al. (2001) made use of P. ericoides,
occurring on the mobile dunes of this area as a natural
monitor to indicate coastal erosion.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina ericoides ranges
from Melkbosstrand along the coast of the Cape Penin-
sula to De Mond in the Bredasdorp District (Eigure 7). It
is endemic to the Southwestern and Agulhas Plain
Centres within the CER. This species occurs on littoral
sand between rocks, or in dune valleys between the pri-
mary and secondary dunes.
According to a note on the specimen Taylor 4042, P.
ericoides forms part of the Coastal Eynbos (Acocks
1988), currently divided by Rebelo (1998) into the
Bothalia33,l (2003)
73
Laterite Fynbos of the Elim Flats, the Limestone Fynbos
on calcareous sands overlying the limestone and associ-
ated calcretes of the Bredasdoip Formation, and the Sand
Plain Fynbos from the Olifants River Mouth to Muizen-
berg on the West Coast lowlands. According to Rebelo
{ 1998) the southernmost centre of the Sand Plain Fynbos
is almost engulfed by the Cape Town Metropolitan Area
and the area between Milnerton and Malmesbury must
rank as one of the world’s hottest spots for the loss of
plant biodiversity.
Consen’ation status: Lower Risk (LR-nt) (Victor
2002), as a large portion of the coast along the Cape
Peninsula is affected by human impact and invasion by
alien vegetation associated with the Cape Town Metro-
politan Area.
7. Passerina rigida Wikstr. in Kunglinga Svenska
Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 39; 326 (1818);
Meisn.: 402 (1840); Steud.; 274 (1841); Drege; 208
(1843); C.A.Mey.; 49 (1843); Meisn.: 563 (1857);
C.H. Wright; 13 (1915); Thoday; 165 (1924a); Palmer &
Pitman; 1585 ( 1972); Coates Palgrave; 649 (1977); Bond
& Goldblatt; 433 (1984); A.E.van Wyk & P.van Wyk; 68
(1997). Type; Hab. ad Promont bonae spei [Cape
Peninsula], Prof. Sparrman s.n.. Herb. TInmh. 9578
(UPS, holo.!; M!, S!).
P. eriophora Gand.: 418 ( 1913); Thoday: 165 ( 1924a). Types: Natal
[KwaZulu-Natal], Stanger; Natal, in ora prope Durban [coast near
Durban], Wood 1712 (K!, lecto., designated by Thoday: 165 (1924a),
BM!,BOL!, M!,W!); Wood 6592 (S\).
P. ericoides sensu Meisn.: 562 ( 1857) pro parte quoad specim. Drege
s.n. (MO!), non L.
Many-Stemmed, much-branched, robust shrubs of
(0,6-)l,0-2,0(-3,04) m tall on coastal dunes; secondary
and tertiary branches ascending, conical in appearance,
formation of branchlets profuse, decussate, older branch-
lets self-pruning, lax or arcuate, 60-100 mm long, pro-
gressively shortening towards growing point, young
branchlets ascending, 5-60 mm long, growing point nod-
ding, fertile branchlets often pendulous and secund.
Stems greyish brown, bark stringy; cork grey-brown;
branchlets and growing points densely white-tomentose.
tomentum forming lengthwise patterns with cork on
older branchlets, which later become glabrous. Leaves
imbricate, overlapping ± 50%, appressed, plane shape
lanceolate to ovate, length x depth 1,6-2, 5 x 0, 1-1,1
mm, adaxial surface concave, villous, abaxial surface
convex, glabrous, greyish green, smooth, often covered
by salt crystals; base sessile, dilated; median vein in dis-
tal half visible as a keel, forming acute apex; margins vil-
lous, Inflorescences with spikes usually extended, 6-10-
flowered, arrangement subterminal, axis white-tomen-
tose, proliferating growth common. Bracts appressed,
ascending in fruit, widely ovate, length x depth (2,6-)3,4
X 1,4(-1,9) mm; lamina adaxially concave (inside),
abaxially convex (outside), villous inside, glabrous out-
side, smooth, with 2 or 3 shallow folds on each side of
main vein, wings absent, greyish green, coriaceous; base
dilated; apex with distinct, short, acute point; margins
tomentose, involute. Floral envelope ± 4 mm long, mem-
branous and yellow during pollination, dehydrated after
shedding of pollen, turning red, Hypanthium glabrous at
ovary, neck tomentose, ± 0,8 mm long. Sepals: outer
sepals cymbiform, midrib adaxially tomentose, abaxial
surface glabrous, inner sepals obovate, adaxially tomen-
tose, abaxially glabrous, Androeciiim with filaments of
antipetalous whorl ± 0,5 mm and those of antisepalous
whorl ± 1 ,5 mm long; anthers, ± 0,8 x 0.4 mm, sub-basi-
fixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovary 2.2 x 1.4 mm.
Fruit a fleshy yellow ben'y, ± 2.6 x 2.3 mm, enveloped
by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthium, fragmenting
over widest circumference of fruit, the fragmented
hypanthium, sepals and androecium being shed. Seed ±
1.4 X 1.1 mm. Figure 8.
Nomenclatural notes: in his description of P. rigida,
Wikstrom (1818) clearly indicated the specimen of
Sparrman, in the Thunberg Herbarium, as the type. This
specimen bears the inscriptions Passerina glomerata (3
and epithet rigida in pencil. Thoday (1924a) identified
the handwriting of the pencilled ‘rigida’ as Wikstrdm’s,
comparing it to signed letters in the library at Kew.
Wikstrom’s handwriting was also confirmed in the pre-
sent study, using examples published by Burdet (1979).
According to Stafleu & Cowan (1986), original speci-
mens of the Thunberg Herbarium (to which Sparrman
also contributed) were donated to UPS and the duplicates
FIGURE 8. — Passerina rigida. Bre-
denkump 1013. A, flowering
intlorescence; B, fruiting in-
florescence; C, leaf; D, bract;
E, Bower clasped by bract; F,
hypanthium fragmenting at
circumference of ovary. G,
H, fruit: G, clasped in tomen-
tum of bract; H. yellow,
Beshy beny. I, seed. Scale
bars: 4 mm. Artist: A. Stabler.
74
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
were sent to S. Thus three other Sparnnan s.n. specimens
of Herb. Swartzii, Herb. Wikstromii and Herb. Gastromii,
housed at S, and a fourth one from Schreber’s herbarium,
housed at M, are duplicates. As Wikstrom clearly indi-
cated the specimen in the Thunberg Herbarium as the
type, we regard it as the holotype and the other four
SpaiTman specimens as isotypes.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina rigi-
da is easily distinguished as a robust, rigid shrub, usually
1-2 m high. The ascending branches are conical in shape
due to many branchlets that are pendulous when fertile.
The flowers are yellow and membranous and bright yel-
low berries are borne subterminally. The leaves are nar-
rowly lanceolate to ovate and the apex is acute, with the
main vein visible as a blunt keel. -The bracts are widely
ovate with the apex acute. This species is easily distin-
guished from P. paleacea which occurs on secondary
dunes and is distributed mainly along the southern coast
of Western Cape. Plants of the latter species are less
robust, reaching a maximun height of 1.5 m, character-
ized by an abundance of subcapitulate inflorescences and
the fruits are dry (achenes).
Etymology: the epithet rigida refers to the rigid, ascend-
ing branches, characteristic of the growth form of this
plant.
Common names: Smith (1966) recorded the vernacu-
lar names gonnabas and seekoppiesgonna, while both
Palmer & Pitman (1972) and Coates Palgrave (1977)
added the name ‘dune gonna’. Palmer & Pitman (1972)
also listed the names ishoba and imyenyevit. The names
‘dune-string’, duinetaaibos and gonnabos were used by
Lubke & Van Wijk (1998). Diiin-gonna, ‘dune gonna’,
inwele, imyenyevii are names given by Von Breitenbach
et cd. (2001).
Uses: Passerina rigida is a pioneer of the coastal
dunes along large portions of the South African coast.
Because these robust plants are excellent sand binders
and are completely adapted to maritime winds and salt
spray, they can be used in the rehabilitation of coastal
dunes in disturbed areas. P. rigida has an extensive root
system from which resprouting commonly takes place.
The yellow bemes are an important food source for ani-
mals inhabiting coastal areas, especially birds.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina rigida is distrib-
uted from Witsand River Mouth on the western coast of
the Cape Peninsula, along the coastline of South Africa
to Lake Sibayi on the northeastern coast of KwaZulu-
Natal (Figure 9). It is endemic to the coastlines of
KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape and Western Cape. The
specimen Taylor 4143, recorded as far North as
Lambert’s Bay on the West Coast, is regarded as an out-
lier, as no other specimens have been recorded in the grid
3318. Thoday (1924a) mentioned Bowker s.n. from
Somerset, Cooper 2301 from Albany and Ecklon &
Zeyher s.n. (SAM 19801) as specimens from inland local-
ities. In recent years more cases of P. rigida growing
along sandy banks of rivers adjacent to the coast have
been noted.
This species occurs on littoral sand dunes and ham-
mock dunes just above the level of spring tide. It is also
found in marshy places and on sandy banks of river
mouths and lagoons. A stunted form is present on shal-
low marine sand over limestone and on rocky hills fac-
ing the sea. Lubke & Van Wijk (1998) regard P. rigida
on the southern and Eastern Cape coast as a pioneer
found in bush clumps or bush pockets on rear dunes.
According to them, there are often no pioneer communi-
ties on the vast dune sands and the first vegetation
encountered as one moves away from the shore is dune
thicket, in which P. rigida is one of the dominant shrubs.
Passerina species occurring on littoral dunes in Western
Cape are found mainly in Coastal Fynbos (Acocks
1988). From the southern Cape coast to Port Alfred, dune
fynbos and dune thicket form a mosaic as well as a suc-
cessional series between the two vegetation types (Lubke
& Van Wijk 1998).
Conser\>ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN
Species Survival Commission 2000).
8. Passerina nivicola Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk in
Bothalia 32: 77 (2002c). Type: Western Cape, 3319
(Worcester): Ceres Dist., Waboomberg, 1 760 m, (-DD),
FIGURE 9. — Known distribution of
Passerina rigida, •; P. nivi-
cola, ■ .
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
75
FIGURE 10. — Passerina esterhuy-
seniae, Esterhuysen 26859.
A, inflorescence with apex
growing out, returning to
vegetative growth (prolifer-
ating growth); B, leaf; C,
bract; D. flower clasped by
bract showing fragmentation
of hypanthium at circumfer-
ence of fruit; E, fruit with
remnants of hypanthium. F,
G, achene: F, enveloped by
membranous pericarp; G, lat-
eral view. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Artist: A. Stadler.
12 November 1989, E.G.H. Oliver 9281 (PRE!, holo.;
NBG!, iso.).
Passerina sp. now I Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 70 (2000); Bredenk.
& A.E.van Wyk: 56 (2001a); Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 217 (2001b).
For a complete description see Bredenkamp & Van Wyk
in Bothalia 32: 76-79 (2002c). Distribution (Figure 9).
Consetyation status: Fower Risk [FR-lcj (Victor 2002).
This species is rare, but does not qualify for Red Fist sta-
tus under lUCN (2000) guidelines.
9. Passerina esterhuyseniae Bredenk. & A.E.van
Wyk, sp. nov., P. comosae C.H. Wright affinis. Bracteae
galeiformes, circumscriptione obovatae; lamina adaxi-
aliter concava, abaxialiter convexa, intra setosa, extra
glabra, tenuiter chartacea, laevis, concolorans, brunneo-
la, in marginem membranaceum vel in alas membran-
aceas expansa; basis cuneata; costa excurrens apicem
subacutum vel acutum faciens; margines ciliati dimidio
superiore. Elores membranacei, tempore pollinationis
flavidi, postea rubri ad brunnei.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3218 (Clanwilliam): N Ceder-
berg Mountains, (-BB), Groenberg near Pakhuis, along
base of high rugged rock, rocky slopes, ±1 167 m, 27-
12-1956, Esterhuysen 26859 (BOF, holo.!).
Passerina sp. now 2 Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 70 (2000); Bredenk.
& A.E.van Wyk: 56 (2001a); Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 217 (2001b).
Shrubs or shrublets 0.3-0.5 m high. Stems greyish
brown, younger branchlets greyish tomentose; cork fine-
ly fissured, grey-brown, displaying whitish sclerenchy-
ma fibres at scars. Leaves imbricate on young branchlets,
closely appressed to stem, cymbiform, plane shape lin-
ear-lanceolate, length X depth ± 2.0 x 0.5 mm; lamina
inversely ericoid, adaxial surface concave, setose, abaxi-
al surface convex, glabrous; base sessile; apex rounded
into subacute point; margins sometimes ciliate. Inflores-
cences polytelic synflorescences; main florescences and
co-florescences spicate. Bracts enveloping flowers and
fruits, largest after anthesis of flowers, becoming more
coriaceous and rounded at fruit set, decussate, imbricate,
sessile, helmet-shaped, widely obovate in outline, length
X depth ± 3.1 X 2.4 mm; lamina adaxially concave
(inside), abaxially convex (outside), setose on inside,
glabrous on outside, thinly chartaceous, smooth, concol-
oroLis, brownish, extending into a membranous rim or
membranous wings; base cuneate; main vein extending
to form a subacute to acute apex; margins ciliate in dis-
tal half. Eloral envelope constituting hypanthium (fused
calyx and androecium) and sepals; membranous and yel-
lowish during pollination, dehydrated after shedding of
pollen, becoming papyraceous, turning red to brown, ±
4.6 mm long. Hypanthium a membranous cylindric tube,
indumentum at ovary and neck tomentose, neck ± 0.7
mm long, abscission tissue and articulation plane absent.
Sepals 4, petaloid, imbricate in bud, flexed in flower;
outer sepals concave oblong with apex adaxially tomen-
tose, abaxially setose; inner sepals concave, obovate
with apex adaxially glabrous, abaxially setose.
Androecium: filaments of antipetalous whorl + 0.4 mm
and those of antisepalous whorl ± 1 .2 mm long. Ovary ±
1.8 X 0.5 mm. Emit enveloped by persistent, loosely
ananged hypanthium fragmenting over widest circum-
ference of fruit, the fragmented hypanthium, sepals and
androecium being shed; an achene with pericarp mem-
branous and dry, ± 2.5 x 1.2 mm. Figure 10.
76
Bothalia33,l (2003)
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
esterhiiyseniae is easily distinguished from P. comosa by
its helmet-shaped bracts, which are widely obovate in
outline. The concolorous, brownish bracts are thinly
chartaceous and smooth in texture, the lamina extends
into a membranous rim or membranous wings and the
main vein elongates forming a subacute to acute apex.
The flowers are membranous and yellowish during polli-
nation and red to brown after shedding of the, pollen.
Eponymy: this species is dedicated to Elsie Ester-
huysen who diligently collected plants especially the
high-mountain flora of the Northern, Western and East-
ern Cape.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina esterhiiyseniae
has been collected on the northern Cederberg Mountains
at Groenberg near Pakhuis and at Konpoort (Eigure 1 1 ).
It is endemic to the Northwestern Centre within the CER.
The northern Cederberg area is covered by Mountain
Eynbos (Rebelo 1998). This species grows at the peaks
of mountain tops at altitudes of ± 1 167 m, or against
rocky slopes amongst high rugged rocks. Confined most-
ly to mountainous areas, this species is still undercollect-
ed. Pillans 7689 (BOL) collected on slopes near the road
SE of Redelinghuis has been classified under P. ester-
hiiyseniae, although these plants seem to be more robust
and grow at lower altitudes.
Conservation status: Lower Risk (LR-lc) (Victor
2002), as the population size of this species is probably
very small or restricted.
10. Passerina comosa (Meisn.) C.H. Wright in
Elora capensis 5,2: II (1915); Thoday; 158 (1924a);
Bond & Goldblatt: 432 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning:
683 (2000). Type: Little Namaqualand; Khamiesberg
Range, between Pedros Kloof and Leliefontein, 3000-
4()0() ft., Drege 2570 [K!, lecto., designated by Thoday:
388 (1924b); PRE!|.
R Jllifoniiis L. var. comosa Meisn.: 399 ( 1 840); Meisn.: 562 ( 1 857);
C.H.Wrighl: II ( 1915); Thoday: 158 (1924a).
R. fulcifonnis Drege: 68 (1843) nom. nud.
FIGURE 1 1 . — Known distribution of
Rasserina esterhuyseniae, •;
R. comosa. ■.
Small shrubs, (0.3-)0.6-0.9(-1.06) m high, branches
often virgate. Steins grey-brown; cork fissured length-
wise, grey-brown, suiTounding prominent leaf scars;
indumentum of young branches densely white or yellow-
ish tomentose, flaking off with cork on older branchlets,
which become glabrous. Leaves imbricate, overlapping ±
20%, diverging at an angle of 20°, plane shape linear to
narrowly lanceolate, length x depth (2.7-)3.0(^.0) x
0.6-0.9 mm, adaxial surface concave, villous, abaxial sur-
face convex, tomentose to villous, rugose or warty with
bases of fallen hairs; base sessile; apex obtuse to subacute;
margins glabrous, basally setose. Inflorescences with
spikes usually extended, 6-12-flowered, arrangement
subterminal, axis white-tomentose, proliferating growth
common. Bracts appressed, widely ovate, length x depth
(3.0-)5.5 X 1.5(-1.8) mm; lamina adaxially concave
(inside), abaxially convex (outside), villous inside,
tomentose to villous outside, coriaceous, rugose with
bases of fallen hairs, ± 3-ribbed on each side of main
vein, margins submembranous or wings extended and
abaxially setose to villous; base sessile; apex acute; mar-
gins glabrous, basally setose, involute. Floral envelope ±
7.3 mm long, yellow-pink during pollination, dehydrated
after shedding of pollen, turning red. Hypanthiiini
glabrous at ovary, neck tomentose, ± 0.9 mm long.
Sepals: outer sepals cymbiform, inner sepals elliptic,
outer and inner sepals adaxially glabrous, abaxially
tomentose. Androeciiun with filaments of antipetalous
whorl ± 0.7 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 1.5
mm long; anthers 0.7 x 0.4 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous
and 4-locular. Ovary ± 2.7 x 1 mm. Fruit an achene with
pericarp membranous and dry, ±2.5x1 .2 mm, envelop-
ed by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthium, breaking
up at neck base due to dehydration and torsification of
tissue, resulting in the sepals and androecium being shed.
Figure 12.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
comosa and P. qiiadrifaria both have abaxially hairy
bracts and are easily confused. However, these two
species are geographically segregated, with P. comosa
considered as a ‘north-western endemic’ of the Cape
Bora (Weimarck 1941 ), whereas P. qiiadrifaria is endemic
to the Karoo Mountain and Southeastern Centres. Mor-
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
77
phologically P. comosa is less robust, interno(Jes are
longer, leaves a(Jhere closely to the stem and are gener-
ally more hairy and the bracts often have extended wings
that are abaxially setose to villous.
Etymology, the epithet comosa refers to the hairs on
the abaxial surface of the leaves, bracts and sepals, which
are characteristic of this species.
Distribution and ecology. Passerina comosa ranges
from mountain summits and slopes of the Kamiesberg to
Calvinia in the Northern Cape (Figure 11). In Western
Cape it is distributed in the area between 33° and 34°S lat-
itude and from 19° to 21°E longitude, with Primos 41
(PRE) as the most easterly outlier. This species is endem-
ic to the Northern Cape, as well as the Northwestern,
Southwestern and Karoo Mountain Centres within the
CFR. It occurs on the Roggeveld, Witteberg and the Klein
Swartberg Mountain Ranges. This species is found in sand
among rocks, on rocky ledges, on mountain summits, or
on SW-facing slopes at altitudes of 1 000-1 200 m.
Consenation status: Least Concern (EC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
1 1 . Passerina pendula Eckl. & Zeyh. e.x Tlioday in
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information, Kew 4: 155
(1924a); Bond & Goldblatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt &
Manning: 684 (2000). P. rigida Wikstr. var. comosa
Meisn.: 402 (1840); Drege: 584 (1847a); Meisn.: 563
(1857); C.H. Wright: 13 (1915) pro parte; Thoday; 155
(1924a). Type: Uitenhage Div., Zwartkops River, Eckloii
& Zexher 7381 [K!, lecto., designated by Thoday: 387
(1924b); BREM!, P!, PRE!, WU!].
P. pendula Eckl. & Zeyh. fide Drege: 210 (1847b) nom. nud.; Meisn.:
563 (1857) nom. nud.
Erect, many-stemmed shrubs, 1.0-1. 5 m high, young
branchlets often pendulous. Stems greyish brown; indu-
mentum of young stems densely white-tomentose, flak-
ing off on older branchlets, which become glabrous,
remaining indumentum forming lengthwise patterns with
FIGURE 12. — Passerina comosa.
Andraea 1288. A, inflores-
cence with apex growing out,
returning to vegetative growth
(proliferating growth); B,
leaf; C, bract; D, flower clasp-
ed by bract. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Artist: G. Condy.
grey-brown cork; brown leaf scars prominent. Leaves
greyish green, imbricate, overlapping ± 25%, appressed,
plane shape rhombic, length x depth 2. 5-3.4 x 1.0-1. 2
mm, adaxial surface concave, comose, abaxial surface
convex, softly coriaceous and smooth, glabrous; base
sessile, abruptly tapered; apex subacute; margins brown-
ish setose. Inflorescences with multiflowered main and
co-florescences; spikes usually extended, 6-16-flow-
ered, airangement subterminal, axis white-tomentose,
proliferating growth common. Bracts greyish green
when fresh, grey-brown in dried specimens, appressed,
rhombic, length x depth (3.0-)4.2 x 1.0(-1.5) mm; lami-
na adaxially concave (inside), abaxially convex (out-
side), comose inside, glabrous outside, softly coriaceous
and smooth, wings membranous; base cuneate; apex
obtusely angled; margins brownish setose. Eloral en-
velope ± 6.5 mm long, membranous and yellow-pink
during pollination, dehydrated after shedding of pollen,
turning red to brown. Hypanthium glabrous at ovary,
neck tomentose, ± 0.6 mm long. Sepals: outer sepals
cymbiform, adaxially scantily tomentose, abaxially
glabrous; inner sepals oblong, adaxially scantily tomen-
tose, abaxially glabrous. Androecium with filaments of
antipetalous whorl ± 1 .5 mm and those of antisepalous
whorl ± 2 mm long; anthers ± 0.8 x 0.4 mm, sub-basi-
fixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovaiy ± 2.0 x 0.7 mm.
Emit an achene with pericaip membranous and dry, ± 2.5
X 1.2 mm, enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged
hypanthium, breaking up at neck base due to dehydration
and torsification of tissue, resulting in the sepals and
androecium being shed. Eigure 13.
Nomenclatural notes: Passerina pendula, ascribed to
Ecklon & Zeyher, was first published as a nomen nudum
by Drege (1847b). This name was placed in synonymy
under P. rigida var. comosa by Meisner (1857). Wright
(1915) partly followed Meisner’s inteipretation of P. rigi-
da var. comosa, but in the citation of the specimens he
added all those that were later published as P. hurchellii
by Thoday ( 1924a). In his revision of Passerina, Thoday
( 1924a) reinstated the name P. pendula Eckl. & Zeyh. ex
Meisn., as the varietal name ‘comosa’ had already been
used at species level by Wright (1915). The present study
78
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 13. — Passerina pendula,
Bredenkamp 908. A, inflores-
cence with apex growing out,
returning to vegetative growth
(proliferating growth); B, leaf;
C. bract; D, flower. Scale
bars: 2 mm. Artist: G. Condy.
regards Thoday’s publication of P. pendula as valid, as it
is accompanied by a Latin diagnosis, a description of the
species and it was published in 1924. As P. pendula Eckl.
& Zeyh. ex Meisn. was based on a nomen nudum, and
since Thoday ascribed the name to Ecklon & Zeyher, the
correct author citation for this species is P. pendula Eckl.
& Zeyh. ex Thoday. '
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
pendula is distinguished from P. burchellii by being
taller (up to 1.5 m), much-branched shrubs with pendu-
lous branchlets, with grey-green, softly coriaceous and
smooth leaves and yellow-pink membranous flowers that
are abaxially glabrous and adaxially scantily tomentose.
Etymology: the specific epithet pendula refers to the
pendulous branchlets of these shrubs as seen in their nat-
ural habitat.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina pendula is ende-
mic to the Southeastern Centre within the CFR. It is dis-
tributed on hills and slopes from the Kouga Mountains
in Western Cape to the Langkloof Mountains and the
Great Winterhoek Mountains in Eastern Cape (Figure
14). The species is also distributed along watercourses
as it occurs in the KwaZunga Catchment Basin and on
the banks of the Upper Swartkops River as well as the
Bushmans River at Port Elizabeth. P. pendula grows at
altitudes of ( 133-)383-600 m. On mountain slopes it is
often found in a belt above valley thicket and below
mountain fynbos. It grows in sand or shallow, gravelly,
sandy loam. The plants are frequent throughout the nat-
ural range of the species and a number of populations
are conserved in the Groendal Nature Reserve at Uiten-
hage.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN
Species Survival Commission 2000).
12. Passerina galpinii C.H.Wright in Flora capen-
sis 5,2: 10 (1915) as P. galpini; Thoday; 161 (1924a);
Bond & Goldblatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning:
683 (2000). Type: Cape [Western Cape], Riversdale
Dist., Melkhoutfontein, about 600 ft, 7 October 1897,
Galpin 4491 (K, holo.!; PRE!).
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
79
c
FIGURE 15. — Passerina galpinii,
Bredenkamp 946. A, inflores-
cence with apex growing out.
returning to vegetative growth
(proliferating growth); B.
leaf; C. bract; D, flower
clasped by bract, hypanthium
fragmenting at circumfer-
ence of ovary. Scale bars: A,
3 mm; B-D, 2 mm. Artist: G.
Condy.
Stunted or erect, much-branched shrubs, (0.1-)0.3-1.0
(-1.2) m high. Stems light greyish brown; indumentum
of young stems greyish brown tomentose; cork grey-
brown, fissured lengthwise, with sclerenchyma fibres
protruding between fissures; leaf scars rounded. Leaves
greyish green, imbricate, overlapping 10%-25%, diverg-
ing at an angle of 30°, plane shape linear, incurved
towards apex, length x depth 2.9— 4.5 x 0.5-0. 8 mm,
adaxial surface concave, comose, abaxial surface con-
vex, chartaceous, glabrous; base sessile; apex subacute to
obtuse; margins glabrous, involute. Inflorescences with
spikes subterminal, usually congested, 8-10-flowered,
axis whitish tomentose, proliferating growth common.
Bracts appressed, oblate, length x depth (3.6-)4.5 x
1.1 (-2. 2) mm; lamina greyish green, adaxially concave
(inside), abaxially convex (outside), chartaceous,
glabrous outside, midrib extended into leaf-like point,
tomentose inside; wings straw-coloured, membranous,
broadly rounded, bullate; base cuneate; apex subacute;
margins glabrous, involute. Floral envelope ±5.3 mm
long, papyraceous and yellow-pink during pollination,
dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red to
brown. Hypanthium pubescent at ovary, neck pubescent,
± 1 mm long. Sepals: outer sepals concave elliptic, glabrous,
inner sepals obovate, abaxially glabrous, apex margin
adaxially tomentose. Androeciiim with filaments of anti-
petalous whorl ± 1 .4 mm and those of antisepalous whorl
± 2.1 mm long; anthers ± 0.6 x 0.5 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-
thecous and 4-locular. Ovary’ ± 2.0 x 1.1 mm. Fruit an
achene with pericarp membranous and dry, ± 2.5 x 1 .2
mm, enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthi-
um, breaking up at circumference of ovary, resulting in
the sepals and androecium being shed. Figure 15.
Nornenclatiiral notes: Passerina galpini C.H. Wright
(1915), published with a full description, but without a
Latin diagnosis, was accepted by Thoday ( 1924a). In the
present study the specific epithet is corrected to "gal-
pinii’ and the name accepted as validly published by
Wright, as the starting date for a Latin diagnosis as pre-
requisite for valid publication is 1 January 1935 (Greuter
et al. 2000).
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
galpinii is distinguished by its characteristic bracts,
which are oblate, with the midrib extended into a leaf-
like point; the lamina is cymbiform, greyish green, char-
taceous and glabrous, with the midrib adaxially tomen-
tose; the wings are straw-coloured, membranous, broad-
ly rounded and bullate. The distribution of this species is
also diagnostic as it is endemic to the Agulhas Plain
Centre within the CFR.
Eponymy: Passerina galpinii was named in honour of
the botanist E.E. Galpin. The holotype of this name,
Galpin 4491, was collected on 7 October 1897. At this
time, Galpin organized a collecting trip from Port Eliza-
beth via the Humansdoip, Knysna, George, Riversdale,
Swellendam and Caledon Districts to Cape Town and
increased his collecting numbers from 3531 to 4846. All
these specimens were probably identified at the Bolus
Herbarium in Cape Town, where he also spent a few
weeks (Gunn & Codd 1981).
Common name: Rebelo (1998) mentions the vernacu-
lar name Eliin gonna for this species.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina galpinii is ende-
mic to the Agulhas Plain Centre within the CER. It is dis-
tributed on stony flats, coastal limestone deposits and
limestone hills, from Elim to Bredasdorp, Arniston, Stil-
baai, Melkhoutfontein, Albertinia and Mossel Bay
(Figure 14); it grows at altitudes of 0-290 m. Plants reach
a height of ± 1 .2 m on stony flats, but become stunted on
southeast-facing slopes of limestone hills, overlooking
the sea. The plants are frequent in their natural environ-
ment. They are conserved in the De Hoop and Potberg
Nature Reserves and several private nature reserves. The
vegetation of the area is threatened by large stands of
Acacia cyciops (r-ooikmns), an alien invasive tree.
80
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Passerina galpinii is associated with Laterite Fynbos
(Rebelo 1998), occiiiTing on the Elim Flats of Western
Cape, which is characterized by gravelly, lateritic and
seasonally waterlogged soils. The present study also
indicates the presence of this species in Limestone Fyn-
bos, where it occurs on coastal limestone deposits.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
13. Passerina drakensbergensis Hilliard &
B.L.Burtt in Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens
15: 233 (1987); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 88 (1988). Type:
Natal [KwaZulu-Natal],' Harrismith, Bergville Dist.,
Cathedral Peak Forest Reserve, Ndedema River, 6000 ft,
5 November 1985, Hilliard & Burtt 18570 (E, holo.; K!,
M!, P!, PRE!, S!).
Erect, many-stemmed shrubs, ± 2 m high, much-
branched. Stems grey-brown; indumentum of young
stems closely white-tomentose, flaking off on older
branches, forming lengthwise patterns with patches of
yellowish brown cork; leaf scars prominent. Leaves
greyish green (glaucous), imbricate, overlapping ± 15%,
appressed, plane shape linear to lanceolate, longitudinaly
folded and somewhat keeled, length x depth (3.5-)
4.2-5.5(-6.5) X 0.8-2 mm, adaxial surface concave,
tomentose, abaxial surface slightly convex, rugose,
glabrous; base sessile, abruptly narrowed; apex subacute,
sometimes incurved; margins setose. Inflorescences with
multiflowered main and co-florescences; spikes usually
extended, 8-12-flowered, arrangement subterminal, axis
white-tomentose, proliferating growth common. Bracts
greyish green (glaucous), appressed, lanceolate, length x
depth 4.75-6.0(-7.0) x 1.5 mm; lamina folded length-
wise and keeled, adaxially concave (inside), abaxially
slightly convex (outside), villous inside, glabrous out-
side, coriaceous, obscurely ribbed and reticulately
veined; base cuneate; apex obtuse to acute; margins
sometimes narrowly membranous. Floral envelope ± 5.9
mm long; papyraceous and yellow-pink during pollina-
tion, dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red to
brown. Hypanthium scantily tomentose at ovary, neck
tomentose, ± 1.7 mm long. Sepals: outer and inner sepa-
ls concave lanceolate, outer sepals adaxially glabrous,
abaxially tomentose; inner sepals adaxially and abaxial-
ly tomentose. Androecium with filaments of antipetalous
whorl ± 1 .2 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 2 mm
long; anthers oblong, 0.9(-1.25) x 0.3 mm, sub-basifixed,
2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovary ± 2.4 x 0.9 mm. Fruit an
achene with pericarp membranous and dry, ± 2.5 x 1.2
mm, enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthi-
um, breaking up at neck base due to dehydration and tor-
sification of tissue, resulting in the sepals and androeci-
um being shed. Figure 16.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
drakensbergensis is characterized by appressed leaves,
up to 6.5 mm long. The bracts are lanceolate, up to 7 mm
long, the apex is obtuse to acute without a leaf-like point
and membranous wings are absent. It may easily be con-
fused with P. montivaga and P. montana, both occuning
in the northern KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg area.
P. montivaga has longer leaves (up to 8 mm) and bracts
with the midrib extended, forming a straight or filiform,
leaf-like point. The wings are ovate with margins hairy in
the distal half, or obtrullate, narrowing abruptly into the
midrib. P. montana can be separated by its terminal sub-
capitulate spikes and short leaves (up to 4 mm long),
which are linear to lanceolate, with a dilated base and
with a prominent median vein in the upper third of the
leaf, incurved at the acute apex. The bracts are ovate to
obovate in outline.
Passerina montivaga is a fynbos element which pos-
sibly originated in the southern Cape and dispersed east-
wards. Both this species and P. montana are distributed
from Eastern Cape via the Drakensberg Mountains
northwards to Zimbabwe. Although the distribution of P.
drakensbergensis, P. montivaga and P. montana overlap
in the northern part of the KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg,
significant trends in the geographical and altitudinal
ranges of these species have been identified.
FIGURE 16. — Passerina drakens-
bergensis, Bredenkamp 1 02 1.
A, innoiescence with apex
growing out, retiiniing to
vegetative growth (prolifer-
ating growth); B, leaf; C,
bract; D, Bower clasped by
bract. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Artist: G. Condy.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
81
17° 18° 19° 20° 21° 22° 23° 24° 25° 26° 27° 28° 29° 30° 31° 32°
FIGURE 17. — Known distribution
of Passerina drakensbergen-
sis, O; P. coiyinbosa. ■.
Etymology, the specific epithet refers to the location
of this species in the northern KwaZulu-Natal Drakens-
berg.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina drakenshergen-
sis is endemic to the Bergville District in the northern
KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg (Figure 17). It has been
collected from the Royal Natal National Park to Giant’s
Castle Game Reserve at altitudes between 1 500 and
1 980 m. It is frequent at Cathedral Peak above Ndedema
Gorge, where it is found in a marginal belt between for-
est and grassland. It also grows along streams and river-
banks and on mountain slopes.
Consen’ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
14. Passerina corymbosa Eckl. ex C.H. Wright in
Flora capensis 5,2: 14 (1915); Thoday: 162 (1924a).
Type: Cape [Western Cape], Bredasdorp, Zwellendam,
Pupas Valley, Voormansbosch and Duivelsbosch,
Keurboomsrivier, October, Ecklon & Zeyher 40 ( 70.10)
(B, holo.t; W!, lecto., here designated; MO!, S!).
P. filifonnis L. var. vulgaris Meisn.: 399 (1840); Meisn.: 562 (1857);
Drege: 87 (1843). P. vulgaris (Meisn.) Thoday: 162 (1924a); Bond &
Goldblatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning: 684 (2000). Type: locis
subhumidis secus rivulum. prope Paarlberg, alt. 1000-1500 ped. [sub-
humid locality along river, near Paarlberg. alt. 1000-1500 ftj. Nov.-
Dee. 1839. Drege s.n. [K, lecto., designated by Thoday: 388 (1924b);
S!, W!].
P. filifonnis sensu C.H, Wright: 11 (1915) pro parte, non L.
Much-branched shrubs. (0.3-)1.0-1.5(-2.5) m high,
younger branchlets leafy, older ones leafless, often arcu-
ate, indurate. Stems often arising from a woody, under-
ground rootstock, greyish brown; indumentum of young
stems closely whitish tomentose, forming lengthwise
patterns with cork on older branches, which gradually
become glabrous; cork fissured lengthwise, with scle-
renchyma fibres protruding between fissures; leaf scars
oblate. Leaves greyish green, drying greyish brown,
ascending, diverging at an angle of ± 40°, imbricate,
overlapping up to 50%, laterally compressed, plane shape
linear to narrowly lanceolate, length x depth (2.0-)3.2^.4
(-10.0) X 0.5-0. 8 mm, adaxial surface concave, tomen-
tose, abaxial surface glabrous; lamina longitudinaly fold-
ed, midrib distinct and somewhat keeled, with 2 or more
lateral veins visible as faint striae when fresh, base ses-
sile; apex tapered or acute; margins glabrous, involute.
Inflorescences with multiflowered main and co-flores-
cences; spikes usually extended, 10-16-tlowered, arrange-
ment subterminal, axis white-tomentose, proliferating
growth common. Bracts greyish green, ascending, rhom-
bic to obtrullate, distinctly angled, length x depth (4.4-)
5.1 X 1.4(-1.7)mm; lamina folded lengthwise and keeled,
adaxially concave (inside), abaxially slightly convex
(outside), shortly villous inside, glabrous outside, coria-
ceous; wings coriaceous, distinctly 4- or 5-ribbed; base
cuneate; midrib shortly extended into an acute apex;
margins glabrous, involute. Eloral envelope ± 6.2 mm
long, papyraceous and yellow-pink during pollination,
dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red to
brown. Hypanthium glabrous at ovary, neck scantily
tomentose, ± 1.6 mm long. Sepals: outer sepals cymbi-
form, inner sepals obovate, outer and inner sepals adaxi-
ally scantily tomentose, abaxially glabrous. Androeciiim
with filaments of antipetalous whorl ± 0.7 mm and those
of antisepalous whorl ± 1.4 mm long; anthers ovoid, ±
0.9 X 0.4 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular.
Ovary ±2.1 x 1.1 mm. Emit an achene with pericarp
membranous and dry, ± 2.6 x 1 .5 mm, enveloped by per-
sistent, loosely aiTanged hypanthium, breaking up at
neck base due to dehydration and torsification of tissue,
resulting in the sepals and androecium being shed.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
corymbosa is distinguished by its greyish green leaves
and grey-brown stems of which the older branchlets are
leafless, often arcuate and indurate. The leaves are lateral-
ly compressed with the distinct midrib somewhat keeled.
The rhombic to obtrullate (diamond-shaped) bracts are
always conspicuously angled and distinctly 4- or 5-
ribbed. The most diagnostic character in the leaf anato-
my of P. corymbosa is the presence of a hypodermal
sclerenchymatous sheath, illustrated by Bredenkamp &
Van Wyk (2001a). This species has always been con-
fused with P. filifonnis sensu lato, which has inconsis-
tently been distinguished by longer, filiform leaves. In
Western Cape P. filifonnis subsp. filifonnis is separated
82
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
by widely obovate bracts, narrowing abruptly into a fili-
form point. Where the distribution of P. coiymhosa and
P. montivaga overlap in the southern Cape, the latter
species is distinguished by bracts with ovate wings and
margins that are hairy in the distal half. In Eastern Cape
P. montivaga is distinguished by obtrullate bracts nar-
rowing abruptly into a straight, leaf-like point.
Etymology, of all the species in the genus, Passerina
corymhosa is the most common, as it is adapted to a wide
range of habitats mostly in Western and Eastern Cape.
The specific Latin epithet corymhosa (= with a cluster of
flowers or of fruits) indicates the 10-16-flowered,
extended spikes usually arranged in multiflowered main
and co-florescences.
Common names: according to Van Wyk & Gericke
(2000), P. corymhosa (formerly known as P. vulgaris) is
also called hakkershos, a name that commemorates an
era when the official bakers in the Cape used this plant to
heat up their outdoor ovens.
Uses: from an agricultural point of view. Story (1952)
described P. corymhosa at Keiskammahoek as an un-
palatable bush, which remained undamaged from grazing,
among the few closely cropped specimens of Clijfortia
linearifolia and C. paucistaminea. However, the value of
P. corymhosa as a pioneer, and also in combatting ero-
sion, cannot be underestimated. This species is common-
ly found along roadsides and in other disturbed places. It
is one of the most successful species for the rehabilita-
tion of embankments along newly built roads in Western
and Eastern Cape. The plants are resprouters from
woody, underground rootstocks and are excellent sand
binders, often found on coastal sand dunes. Considering
the human impact and invasion of alien vegetation along
the Cape coast, P. corymhosa would be a natural pioneer,
combatting erosion in areas where alien vegetation is
cleared.
Distrihiition and ecology: except for a few outliers, P.
corymho.sa is endemic to Western and Eastern Cape, and
all the phytogeographic centres within the CFR.
Although this species is distributed from Clanwilliam to
Cape Town and eastwards to East London, it most com-
monly occurs in an area between the coast and the 33°S
latitude and from 18° to 29°E longitude (Figure 17).
Gerstner 105 (PRE), collected near Compasberg in the
Lady Grey District, represents the most northerly distri-
bution of P. corymhosa in Eastern Cape. The specimens
collected in KwaZulu-Natal are regarded as outliers, rep-
resenting remnants of a former wider distribution.
Hilliard 40H! (PRE), collected at the Ellesmere Farm in
Ngome (KwaZulu-Natal), is an anomalous specimen,
with a greyish appearance, infected by fungi and record-
ed from cliff faces. This specimen was classified as
P. corymhosa on the basis of the angular bracts and the
leaves that are laterally compressed. The other two speci-
mens, Herh. Poeppig s.n., probably collected before
1868, and Rudatis 1204 (PRE), collected in 1910, repre-
sent populations that have possibly succumbed to human
impact.
Passerina corymhosa is a species with a wide habitat
spectrum. It most commonly occurs as a pioneer along
roadsides over the whole range of its distribution. The
species is found in stony areas on mountain slopes, peaks
and mountain passes. Along the coastal region, it is often
found on the rear dunes. It also grows in river valleys and
on the banks of river mouths. This species is common in
the whole of the Fynbos Biome of the CFR. In Eastern
Cape it is found in all the above-mentioned habitats, but
also in grassland. Story (1952) reported that P. corym-
hosa is found in sourveld and mixed grassveld but that it
showed no sign of advancing into the sweetveld. In open
grassland this species is often clustered along stream-
banks or on rocky areas. P. corymhosa occurs at a range
of altitudes, from sea level up to 1 300 m.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
15. Passerina obtusifolia Thoday in Bulletin of
Miscellaneous Information, Kew 4.T57 (1924a); Bond &
Goldblatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning: 683 (2000).
Type: Cape [Western Cape], Worcester Div., between
Osplaats and Tunnel Sidings 2000-3000 ft., Rogers 16703
[K!, lecto., designated by Thoday: 388 (1924b)].
Erect shrubs with several fairly stout stems, bare at
base, branching profusely higher up, (0.3-)0.8-1.8(-2.4)
m high. Stems ash-grey; indumentum of young stems
whitish tomentose, flaking off, becoming scabrid on older
branchlets and forming lengthwise patterns with cork,
which fissures lengthwise; sclerenchyma fibres protrud-
ing between fissures; leaf scars oblate. Leaves greyish
green, imbricate, spreading at an angle of 45°, plane
shape linear, straight or incurved, length x depth
4.0-8. ()(-l 2.0) X 0.9-1. 5 mm, adaxial surface concave,
comose, abaxial surface convex, coriaceous, glabrous;
base sessile; apex obtuse; margins glabrous, involute.
Inflorescences with multiflowered main and co-flores-
cences; spikes usually extended, 8-16-flowered, arrange-
ment terminal, axis whitish tomentose, proliferating
growth common. Bracts spreading, narrowly obtrullate,
length X depth (4.0-)5.8 x 1.5(-L7) mm; lamina greyish
green, adaxially concave (inside), abaxially convex (out-
side), coriaceous, glabrous outside, tomentose inside,
closely 2-ribbed at margins, midrib extending beyond
lamina into a leaf-like point, apex obtuse; wings absent;
base cuneate; margins glabrous, involute. Floral envelope
± 6.8 mm long, papyraceous and yellow-pink during pol-
lination, dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red
to brown. Hypanthium glabrous at ovary, neck tomentose,
± 1.8 mm long. Sepals: with outer sepals cymbiform,
adaxially tomentose, abaxially glabrous; inner sepals nar-
rowly oblong, adaxially tomentose, abaxially glabrous.
Androecium with filaments of antipetalous whorl ± 1.2 mm
and those of antisepalous whorl ± 2.2 mm long; anthers ±
1.1 X 0.5 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular.
Ovary ± 2.5 x 1.1 mm. Fruit an achene with pericaip
membranous and dry, ± 2.3 x 1 .2 mm, enveloped by per-
sistent, loosely ananged hypanthium, breaking up at cir-
cumference of ovary, resulting in sepals and androecium
being shed. Figure 18.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: the growth
form of P. ohtusifolia may easily be confused with that
of P. corymhosa, but P. ohtusifolia is distinguished by
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
83
FIGURE 18. — Passerina obtiisifolia. Bredenkamp 919. A, flowering
inflorescence; B. leaf: C. bract; D, flower clasped by bract,
fragmenting at circumference of ovary. E. F, achene: E, lateral
view, with basal fragment of membranous pericarp; F, ventral
view, with remnant of membranous pericarp. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Artist: G. Condy.
the spreading, linear, incurved leaves, with obtuse apices.
The bracts are narrowly obtrullate, with the midrib
extending beyond the lamina into a leaf-like point and
the lamina is closely 2-ribbed at the margins.
Intermediate forms between P. obtusifolia and P. trunca-
ta SLibsp. tnincata are found in the Karoo Desert
National Botanical Garden at Worcester. P. obtusifolia
usually occurs on the northern side of the southern Cape
mountain ranges in drier habitats and P.falcifolia is con-
fined to the summits of mountains and southwards
towards the southern Cape coast. Intermediates between
P. obtusifolia and P. falcifolia have been found on the
boundary between the two species, just north of the
Prince Albert Pass.
Etymology, the Latin specific epithet, obtusifolia, refers
to the obtuse apices of leaves and bracts, which are char-
acteristic of this species.
Common name: the vernacular name karoo gonna is
used by the local people at Genadendal.
Uses: according to the curator at the Museum in
Genadendal, P. obtusifolia was traditionally used by the
local people in the home industry of soap-making. The
plants were burnt and the alkaline ashes used to react
with the stearic acid in fat at boiling point, thus forming
soap. In the Robertson area these plants are used in the
wild flower industry. Bayliss 521 (PRE) is a voucher
specimen recorded in cancer research, but the results
must have been negative; these plants are not currently
known for their medicinal value.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina obtusifolia is
endemic to Northern, Western and Eastern Cape (Eigure
19). It is centred in a belt between 33° and 34°S latitude
and from 19° to 27°E longitude, comprising all the cen-
tres within the CFR — it is most common in the Karoo
Mountain, Langeberg and Southeast Centres. P. obtusi-
folia is distributed from Worcester in Western Cape, to
Grahamstown in Eastern Cape. The most northwesterly
distribution are the Vanrhyn’s Pass and the Hantamberg.
The Karoo National Park and the Nuweveld Mountains
in the Beaufort West District and the Lootsberg Pass at
Middelburg are the most northerly distribution in
Western and Eastern Cape. Hilliard & Burtt 14654 and
Acocks 20170 from the Lady Grey District are consid-
ered as outliers.
Passerina obtusifolia is well adapted to drier karoo
habitats and is often found on the north-facing aspect of
mountains in the southern Cape. It frequents the bound-
FIGURE 19. — Known distribution
of Passerina obtusifolia, •;
P. pahidosa. ■.
84
Bothalia33,l (2003)
FIGURE 20. — Passerina pahidosa.
Jangle 156. A, inflorescence
with apex growing out,
returning to vegetative growth
(proliferating growth); B,
leaf; C, bract; D, flower
clasped by bract. Scale bars:
2 mm. Artist: G. Condy.
ary of fynbos and karroid vegetation and is common in
the Little Karoo, growing at altitudes of (300-)670-l 400
(-1 700) m. Although this species occurs at high altitudes
on the summit of the Swartberg Pas's, it grows below the
snow line and does not occur on the highest peaks of
mountain ranges in its distribution range. It is common in
drier mountainous habitats, growing in shallow rocky
soil and between rocks on well-drained slopes. It also
grows amongst sandstone boulders of upper mountain
slopes and on stony ridges of mountain tops. On the
Hantamberg it has been recorded in renosterveld on the
flat, rocky, dolerite summit. On Jonaskop it grows in a
zone below the fynbos and is absent at the summit. This
species is also found amongst rocks in river valleys and
dry streambanks. The average height of these plants is
0.8-1. 8 m, but stunted forms have been recorded from
the arid Bergkwagga National Park, which is one of the
most northeasterly localities. P. ohtiisifolia is a very com-
mon species and amongst the dominant species within its
distribution range.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
16. Passerina paludosa Thoday in Bulletin of Mis-
cellaneous Information, Kew 4: 161 (1924a); Bond &
Goldblatt: 433 ( 1984); Goldblatt & Manning: 683 (2000).
Types: Cape [Western Cape], Simonstown, Cape Flats,
Riet Valley, in and near shallow vleis, November 1922,
Thoday 100 [K!, lecto., designated by Thoday: 388 (1924b);
C!, NBG!, PRElj.
Much-branched shrubs or small tree, up to 2 m high.
Stems fawn-coloured; indumentum of young stems
closely white-tomentose, forming lengthwise patterns
with cork on older branches, which gradually become
glabrous; leaf scars oblate, comose at upper rim. Leaves
erect, nearly straight, greyish green, imbricate, overlap-
ping ± 25%, appressed, plane shape narrowly lanceolate
to lanceolate, longitudinaly folded and somewhat keeled,
length X depth (3,0-)5.5-6.8(-10) x 0. 8-1.4 mm, adaxi-
al surface concave, tomentose, abaxial surface glabrous;
base sessile; apex acute, sometimes incurved, bearing a
persistent tuft of white, erect hairs; margins setose. In-
florescences with multiflowered main and co-florescen-
ces; spikes usually extended, 10-12-flowered, amange-
ment subterminal, axis white-tomentose, proliferating
growth common. Bracts greyish green, appressed, nar-
rowly obtrullate with leaf-like point, length x depth
(5.2-)7.0 X 1.8(-2.0) mm; lamina folded lengthwise and
keeled, adaxially concave (inside), abaxially slightly
convex (outside), basally setose inside, glabrous outside,
coriaceous, ± 2-ribbed; wings membranous with obscure
venation, glabrous; base cuneate; apex acute; margins
white setose. Floral envelope ± 7.2 mm long, papyra-
ceous and yellow-pink during pollination, dehydrated
after shedding of pollen, turning red to brown. Hypan-
thium shortly tomentose at ovary, neck strigose, ± 2.6
mm long. Sepals: outer sepals cymbiform, ad- and abax-
ially glabrous, apex setose; inner sepals oblong, ad- and
abaxially glabrous, apex setose with margins tomentose.
Androecium with filaments of antipetalous whorl
± 1.2 mm and those of antisepalous whorl ± 2.4 mm
long; anthers ovoid, ± 0.7 x 0.5 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-
thecous and 4-locular. Ovary ± 2.3 x 1 mm. Fruit an ach-
ene with pericaip membranous and dry, ± 2.4 x 1.2 mm,
enveloped by persistent, loosely arranged hypanthium,
breaking up at neck base due to dehydration and torsifi-
cation of tissue, resulting in sepals and androecium being
shed. Figure 20.
Diaf’uostic characters and relationships: Passerina
paludosa is a stout shrub up to 2 m high, occurring most-
ly in marshy ground on lowland flats. It is characterized
by erect, nearly straight, greyish green, imbricate, ap-
Bothalia33,l (2003)
85
pressed leaves, which are ± lanceolate. The bracts are
narrowly obtrullate, with the midrib and leaf-like point
stout and the apex acute. This species is distinguished
from P. filiformis subsp. filiformis which has filiform
leaves and widely obovate bracts, which narrow abrupt-
ly into a filiform point.
Etymology: the specific epithet paludosa refers to the
habitat of this species, namely marshy lowland flats;
from the Latin paliidosus (= marshy, swampy or boggy).
Distribution and ecology: Passerina paludosa is
endemic to the Southwestern Centre within the CFR
(Figure 19). Herbarium specimens dated from 1921 to
1995 show that this species used to be distributed from
sandy places along the Malmesbury Road (Acocks 2482),
along marshy areas of the Cape Flats and the Stellen-
bosch District to the Palmiet River at Elgin, the most
easterly locality. As P. paludosa was severely affected by
urbanization and invasion by alien vegetation in the Cape
Peninsula, it is currently confined to small marshy areas
east of Muizenberg.
According to Smuts ( 1996) the only three extant popu-
lations known, are at the Rondevlei Nature Reserve,
Zeekoevlei and along the Strandfontein Road. Label
information on Peterson 1263, collected in 1982, states
that the population at a housing estate site SE of Zee-
koevlei consisted of ± 400 plants, but Smuts (1966)
reported only 60 living plants. At the same time the popu-
lation at Rondevlei consisted of 35 plants and the one
along the Strandfontein Road of possibly a few hundred.
Currently both the Zeekoevlei and Strandfontein sites are
in danger of urban development and are being threatened
by invasive alien vegetation, primarily Port Jackson
{Acacia saligna) and rooikrans (A. cyclops). Conserva-
tion measures proposed by Smuts (1996) include an
environmental impact study at the Zeekoevlei site prior
to any development and a plea for urgent attention by
conservation authorities to ensure the conservation of the
Strandfontein population.
The Rondevlei Nature Reserve boasts more than 250
plant species of which many are rare and endangered.
Species associated with P. paludosa include Chondro-
petalum nudum, Juncus krausii and Leucadendron levi-
sanus. In recent years the management at the reserve
concentrated on restoring and managing its biodiversity.
Alien vegetation has been cleared, plant species that
occurred there historically have been re-introduced and
P. paludosa has been successfully propagated by cut-
tings to expand the population. As acidification is an
important effect of urbanization and as alien vegetation
impacts on the natural drainage system of an area, the
whole wetland east of Muizenberg can be conserved only
if it is included in the Rondevlei Nature Reserve (Smuts
1996).
Recently two new populations of plants, that appear to
be P. paludosa, were collected at Springfontein Earm
near Stanford [3419AD, Louw 7083 (NBG, PRE)], and
in seasonally wet clays at Heidehof, 5 km NW of Pearly
Beach [3419CB, Helme 2376 (NBG, PRE)]. These speci-
mens were not included in the distribution of P. paludosa
as further population studies need to be done. Taking
urbanization and invasion by alien vegetation into
account, the Red List status of P. paludosa was also not
changed.
Conserx’ation status: Vulnerable, [VU B 1 B2abcd] (Victor
2002).
17. Passerina montivaga Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk
in Bothalia 32: 34 (2002d). Type: Natal [KwaZulu-
Natal], 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): hills above Pinetown,
2400 ft, (-DD), 3 December 1 89 1 , /M. Wood in PRE 49409
(PRE!, holo.; MO!).
R montivagus Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 34 (2002d), sphalm.
P. filiformis L.; 559 (1753) pro parte, excluding type; Thunb.; 75
(1794): Wikstr.: 324 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825a); Meisn.: 562 (1857);
C.H.Wright: 10 (1915); Thoday: 159 (1924a); Bond & Goldblatt: 432
(1984); Hilliard & B.L.Burtt: 182 (1987); Goldblatt & Manning: 683
(2000).
Passerina sp. nov. 4 Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 70 (2000); Bredenk.
& A.E.van Wyk: 56 (2001a); Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk: 217 (2001b).
Eor a complete description see Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk in Bothalia 32: 34 (2002d).
Consen’ation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
18. Passerina filiformis L. in Species plantarum:
559 (1753); Thunb.: 75 (1794): J.C.Wendl.: 18 (1798);
Wikstr.: 324 (1818); Thunb.: 374 (1825a); Meisn.: 562
(1857); C.H.Wright: 10 (1915); Thoday: 159 (1924a);
Palmer & Pitman: 1587 (1972); Coates Palgrave: 648
(1977); Bond & Goldblatt; 432 (1984); Hilliard &
B.L.Burtt: 182 (1987); A.E.van Wyk & P.van Wyk : 68
(1997); Goldblatt & Manning; 683 (2000). Bredenk. &
A.E.van Wyk 32: 29 (2002d). Type: Passerina filiformis,
Linnean Herbarium 504.1 [EINN, lecto.!, designated by
Thoday; 388 (1924b)].
P. cupressina J.C.Wendl. nom. nud. Meisn.: 404 (1840); Meisn.:
563 (1857); Thoday: 159 (1924a). P. cupressoides Steud.: 273 (1841).
P. pectinata Lodd.: 18 (1816) nom. nud. Wikstr.: 347 (1818); Meisn.:
404 (1840); Meisn.: 562 (1857); Thoday: 159 (1924a).
Eor a complete description see Bredenkamp & Van
Wyk in Bothalia 32: 29-34, figs 1^ (2002d).
18a. subsp. filiformis
Eor a complete description see Bredenkamp & Van Wyk
in Bothalia 32: 31-33, figs 1-3 (2002d).
18b. subsp. glutinosa (Thoday) Bredenk. &. A.E.van
Wy’k
Eor a complete description see Bredenkamp & Van Wyk
in Bothalia 32: 33-34, fig. 4 (2002d).
Consen’ation status: Lower Risk, [LR-nt] (Victor 2002).
19. Passerina falcifolia (Meisn.) C.H.Wright in
Flora capensis 5,2; 10 (1915); Thoday: 158 (1924a);
Palmer & Pitman: 1585 (1972); Coates Palgrave: 648
86
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
(1977); Bond & Goldblatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt &
Manning: 683 (2000). P. filiformis L. var. falcifolia
Meisn.: 399 (1840); Drege: 118, 124 (1843); Meisn.': 562
(1857); C.H.Wright: 10 (1915); Thoday: 158 (1924a).
Type: Eastern Cape, Uitenhage, Vanstaadesberg [now
Van Staden’s Mountains], 1000-2000 ft, Drege s.n. (K!,
lecto., designated by Thoday: 388 ( 1924b)].
P.filifonnis L. var. divaricata Wikstr.: 325 ( l818);TlTOday: 158 (1924a).
Type: Caput bonae Spei [Cape Peninsula], Sparrman s.n.. Herb. Thimherg
9573 (UPS. holo.!). Herb. Swartzii (S, iso.!).
Much-branched, tall shrubs or small ornamental trees,
( 1.0-)1.2-2.0(-3.04) m high, branchlets often arcuate,
pendulous. Stems grey-brown; indumentum of young
stems closely whitish tomentose, forming lengthwise pat-
terns, with cork on older branches, which gradually
become glabrous, fissuring lengthwise, yellowish brown
lenticulae present; leaf scars oblate. Leaves greyish green,
drying greyish brown, falcate, linear to narrowly lanceo-
late, longitudinaly folded, triangular in section, length x
depth 3.9-5. 6 x 0.6 mm, adaxial surface concave, tomen-
tose, abaxial surface glabrous; base sessile; apex obtuse
or tapered; margins glabrous, involute; younger leaves
inclined, diverging at an angle of ± 60°, imbricate, over-
lapping up to 50%, older leaves horizontally spreading,
not imbricate. Inflorescences with multiflowered main
and co-florescences; spikes usually extended, lax, often
arcuate, up to 16-flowered, arrangement subterminal, axis
white-tomentose, proliferating growth common. Bracts
mottled grey-green, rose-tinted during flowering time,
ascending, imbricate, widely ovute, narrowing into a leaf-
like, falcate point, length x depth (5.3-)5.8 x 1.7(-2.0)
mm; older bracts folded lengthwise along midrib and
keeled, younger bracts adaxially concave (inside), abaxi-
ally slightly convex (outside), villous inside, glabrous
outside, coriaceous; wings chartaceous, distinctly ± 4-
ribbed and reticulately veined; base cuneate; apex obtuse
or tapered; margins ciliate in distal half. Floral envelope
± 8.4 mm long, papyraceous and yellow-pink during pol-
lination, dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red
to brown. Hypanthiinn scantily tomentose at ovary, neck
exserted, often arcuate, tomentose, ± 3 mm long. Sepals:
outer sepals concave, obovate, adaxially scantily tomen-
tose, abaxially glabrous; inner sepals obovate, adaxially
tomentose, abaxially glabrous. Androecium with fila-
ments of antipetalous whorl ± 1 .4 mm and those of anti-
sepalous whorl ± 2.1 mm long; anthers ovoid, ± 1 x 0.4
mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovary ± 2.5
X 0.7 mm. Fruit an achene with pericarp membranous and
dry, ± 2.5 x 1.4 mm, enveloped by persistent, loosely
arranged hypanthium, breaking up at neck base due to
dehydration and torsification of tissue, resulting in sepals
and androecium being shed. Figure 2 1 .
Nomenclatural notes: Wright (1915) overlooked the
combination P. filiformis L. var. divaricata Wikstr.
(1818), also indicated by Thoday (1924a), which is the
earliest name for the taxon. However, this name based on
Sparrman s.n. (Herb. Thunberg 9573) falls into syn-
onymy under P. falcifolia, as the name of a taxon does
not have priority outside the rank in which it was pub-
lished (Greuter et al. 2000).
Diagnostic characters and relationships: Passerina
falcifolia is distinguished by the mottled grey-green fal-
cate leaves, which are inclined or horizontally spreading.
The widely ovate bracts are villous inside and narrow
into a leaf-like, falcate point, with chartaceous wings that
are distinctly ± 4-ribbed and reticulately veined. The
most conspicuous floral character is the slender, often
arcuate, tomentose hypanthium neck, exserted from the
clasping bract. This species may be confused with P. fili-
formis suhsp. filiformis which has widely obovate bracts,
narrowing abruptly into a filiform point. The bracts are
basally to centrally setose on the inside and the wings are
glabrous. P. montivaga is another close species, but is
distinguished by bracts that are basally setose on the
inside, with glabrous wings.
Etymology: the specific epithet falcifolia is derived
from the Latin falcatus (= curved like a sickle), referring
to the falcate or sickle-shaped leaves of these plants.
FIGURE 21. — Pa.sserina falcifolia,
Bredenkamp 917. A. (lower-
ing intloreseence; B. leaf; C,
bract; D. flower clasped by
bract. E. F. anther: E. dorsal
view; F. ventral view. Scale
bars: 2 mm. Artist: G. Condy.
Bothalia33.l (2003)
87
17” 18” 19° 20° 21° 22° 23° 24° 25° 26° 27° 28° 29°
FIGURE 22. — Known distribution
of Passerimi falcifolia. •; P.
rubra, □.
Common names: Passerina falcifolia is also known as
the ‘Outeniqua gonna’ or the Oiiteniekwagonna, refer-
ring to the Outeniqua Mountains where it occurs (Coates
Palgrave 1977). Palmer & Pitman ( 1972) use the vernacu-
lar name forest gonna, as these plants are commonly seen
along roadsides on mountain passes of the southern Cape
forests. Von Breitenbach et al. (2001) use the names
Oiiteniekwa-gonna, gonnabas, gonnahos, kannabas and
Outeniqua gonna, gonna bush.
Uses: Passerina falcifolia is used for fuel or for mak-
ing cord (Palmer & Pitman 1972). According to label
information on Dahlstrand 1905 (PRE), the species is
cultivated by florists. Plants grow into small ornamental
trees and could be used more widely in horticulture.
According to Grobbelaar 63 (PRE), P. falcifolia is a host
to members of the insect genus Eremmis.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina falcifolia is asso-
ciated with forests and Mountain Eynbos (Rebelo 1998)
in the southern Cape and the southern parts of Eastern
Cape. It is a near-endemic to the CER and occurs in the
Karoo Mountain, Southwestern and Southeastern Centres,
as well as the Zuurberg, Blaauwkrantz and Alexandria
Eorests of Eastern Cape. It most commonly occurs in a
belt between the coast and the 33°S latitude and from 22°
to 26°E longitude (Eigure 22). The two specimens.
Brown 25975 and Rogers 28858, collected near Caledon
in October 1924, are regarded as outliers, possibly indi-
cating a wider previous distribution of the species into
areas with woody vegetation in Western Cape. P. falcifo-
lia occurs from Meiringspoort, in the Oudtshoorn area, to
Ruytersbosch in the Mossel Bay area, and along the
Outeniqua, Tsitsikamma and Great Winterhoek Mountains
to the Grahamstown area.
Passerina falcifolia is found on mountain plateaus
and southeast-facing slopes on Table Mountain Sand-
stone in shallow, sandy loam soil. Plants commonly occur
along forest margins, in open patches, or disturbed areas
along roadsides. This species is also found in coastal
regions and riverine fynbos. P . falcifolia grows at a range
of altitudes, from sea level up to 1 100 m.
Conservation status: Least Concern (LC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
20. Passerina rubra C.H. Wright in Elora capensis
5,2: 12 (1924a); Thoday; 156 (1924a); Bond & Gold-
blatt: 433 (1984); Goldblatt & Manning; 684 (2000).
Type; Cape [Western Cape], Ladismith, Muiskraal, near
Garcia Pass, 1200 ft, 3 October 1897, Galpin 4492
[K!, lecto., designated by Thoday; 388 (1924b); GRA!,
PRE!].
P. filifonnis L. var. squarrosa Meisn.: 562 (1857); Thoday: 156
( 1924a). Type: Eastern Cape, prope Cradockstad et Port-Elisabeth [near
CradockTown and Port Elizabeth], October, Zexher 3779 (S!, lecto., here
designated; BM!, MEL!, NBG!, W!).
Much-branched, erect shrubs, with rigid branchlets
and inflorescences or smaller, extensively branched, round-
ed shrublets under arid, calcareous habitat conditions,
(0.2-)0.3-0.75(-l . 1 ) m high. Stems: older ones grey-brown,
indurate, and sclerenchyma fibres exposed; young stems
reddish brown, indumentum whitish tomentose, forming
lengthwise patterns with cork on older branches, which
gradually become glabrous; cork Assuring lengthwise;
internodes longer than leaves during prolific lengthening
of branchlets or shorter under arid conditions. Leaves
greyish green, ascending, appressed, decussate and rigid,
or under arid conditions, imbricate (overlapping 5-30%),
appressed or ascending, diverging at an angle of up to
30°; lamina naiTowly lanceolate or oblong, longitudinaly
folded, triangular in section, length x depth 2.4-4.3 x 0.7
mm, adaxial surface concave, tomentose, abaxial surface
glabrous; base sessile; apex obtuse; margins glabrous,
involute. Inflorescences with conspicuous, multiflow-
ered main and co-florescences; spikes robust, rigid,
extended, narrowly ellipsoid, with rows of enlarged,
decussate, pointed bracts, 20-30-flowered, arrangement
subterminal, axis white-tomentose, proliferating growth
common. Bracts grey-green, rose-tinted during flower-
ing time, ascending, imbricate, widely ovate, midrib
shortly extended into a point, length x depth (4.3-)5.1 x
1.8(-2.0) mm; older bracts folded lengthwise along
midrib, younger bracts adaxially concave (inside), abax-
ially slightly convex (outside), villous inside, glabrous
outside, coriaceous; wings widely ovate, chartaceous, ±
5-ribbed, reticulately veined; base cuneate; apex acute;
margins ciliate in distal half. Floral envelope ±8.4 mm
long, papyraceous and yellow-pink during pollination,
dehydrated after shedding of pollen, turning red to brown.
Hypanthiiim glabrous at ovary, neck exserted, sparsely
pubescent, ± 2 mm long. Sepals: outer sepals cymbiform.
Bothalia33,l (2003)
FIGURE 23. — Passerina rubra, Bre-
denkamp 914. A, inflores-
cence with apex growing out,
returning to vegetative growth
(proliferating growth); B,
leaf; C, bract; D, tlower clasp-
ed by bract; E, fruit clasped
in tomentum of bract, envelop-
ed by hypanthium, fragment-
ed at neck base. F, G, achene:
F. enveloped by membranous
pericarp; G, side view. Scale
bars: 4 mm. Artist: A. Stadler.
ad- and abaxially glabrous, inner sepals obovate, adaxi-
ally scantilly tomentose, abaxially glabrous. Androecium
with filaments of antipetalous whorl ± 0.7 mm and those
of antisepalous whorl ± 1.7 mm long; anthers ovoid, +
0.9 X 0.3 mm, sub-basifixed, 2-thecous and 4-locular. Ovary
±2.1 X 1.1 mm. Fruit an achene with pericaip membra-
nous and dry, ± 2.1 x 1.2 mm, enveloped by persistent,
loosely arranged hypanthium, breaking up at neck base
due to dehydration and tofsification of tissue, resulting in
the sepals and androecium being shed. Figure 23.
Nomenclatural notes: as the starting date for a Latin
diagnosis is 1 January 1935 (Greater et al. 2000), P.
rubra is a valid name, although it was published with a
full description, but without a Latin diagnosis, by Wright
(1915). The combination P. filiformis L. var. squarrosa
(Meisner 1857), was overlooked by Wright (1915), but
mentioned in synonymy by Thoday (1924a). In the pre-
sent revision all the type material cited by both Wright
(1915) and Meisner ( 1857) was studied. Galpin 4492 (K)
was selected as the lectotype of P. rubra by Thoday
( 1924b) and Zeyher 3779 in S was selected as lectotype
for P. filiformis var. squarrosa as it is internationally
available in many herbaria.
Diagnostic characters and relationships: the distribu-
tion of P. rubra partly coincides with that of P. corym-
bosa, P. montivaga and P. falcifolia. P. rubra is a small-
er shrub (average height 0.3-0.75 m), often occurring in
calcareous soil. It is distinguished from the other three
species which are taller (average heights 1-2 m), and
especially from P. falcifolia, which is a tall shrub or a
small tree (up to 3.04 m), often associated with indige-
nous forests. P. rubra may also be separated by the inllores-
cences which have extended, robust spikes, with up to 30
fertile, enlarged bracts. The bracts are typified by the
midrib which is shortly extended into a point and by the
wings which are adaxially tomentose, widely ovate, char-
taceous, ± 5-ribbed and reticulately veined. Flowers are
distinguished by the exserted hypanthium neck, which is
± 2 mm long and glabrous to sparsely pubescent.
Etymology: the specific epithet rubra was derived
from the Latin ruber (= red), refeiring to the conspicu-
ous, multiflowered inflorescences of these plants, which
have 20-30 flowers arranged in four rows and turning
red after wind pollination.
Uses: Passerina rubra is a pioneer which often occurs
along roadsides or in disturbed places, e.g. close to the
salt works in the vicinity of Port Elizabeth. It is also
found on calcareous soils between Port Elizabeth and
Cradock. In the Coega area, earmarked for industrial de-
velopment, P. rubra might be a useful plant for combat-
ting erosion.
Distribution and ecology: Passerina rubra is near-
endemic to the CFR, occurring in the Langeberg, Karoo
Mountain and Southeastern Centres, as well as southern
parts of the Eastern Cape. It most commonly occurs in a
belt between the coast and the 33°S latitude and from 20°
to 26°E longitude. P. rubra is distributed from the Bonte-
bok National Park in the Swellendam District, eastwards
to Gowie’s Kloof near Grahamstown (Figure 22). This
species is somewhat variable. It was initially thought that
plants in Western Cape were more rigid, with longer
internodes and appressed leaves, which did not overlap,
whereas those in Eastern Cape tended to be rounded
shrublets, with imbricate, ascending leaves. After many
specimens, from all parts of the range had been studied,
no geographical or morphological discontinuity between
the two forms could be shown, and it was decided that
the morphological differences were probably due to plas-
ticity. Plants growing in more arid conditions and cal-
careous soil, typical of the Port Elizabeth and Cradock
areas, tend to be rounded much-branched shrublets, with
short internodes and imbricate, ascending leaves. Under
more favourable conditions in sandy loam, the plants are
taller, less branched, internodes are longer and the ap-
pressed leaves do not overlap.
Passerina rubra is common in the Steytlerville, Humans-
dorp. Port Elizabeth and Grahamstown areas of Eastern
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
89
Cape and less frequent in Western Cape. The area be-
tween Cradock and Port Elizabeth is renowned for the
ancient dunes and flats, abounding in limestone. Acocks
(1988) described the vegetation occurring on the lime-
stone as False Fynbos (A70), also known as Mountain
Fynbos or Grassy Fynbos (Rebelo 1998). P. rubra seems
to be well adapted to the calcareous soils on which it
occurs. These plants are often pioneers in disturbed areas
and along roadsides, as in the Colchester, Coega and the
Markman industrial areas of Port Elizabeth. At the
Groendal Catchment Basin, this species occurs in grass-
land on sandstone and it is also found on semi-karroid,
dry, rocky hillsides in the Baviaanskloof area. At the
Bontebok National Park it is found in flat areas between
fynbos species. P. rubra grows at altitudes of 70-700 m.
Consen’ation status: Feast Concern (FC) (lUCN Spe-
cies Survival Commission 2000).
DOUBTFUL NAME
Passerina hamulata Gand.; 418 (1913). Hab.: Cap, in
dunis arenosis prope Wynberg [Western Cape, Simons-
town, sand dunes near Wineberg], Bolus s.n. Note: P.
paleacea. Bolus 2926, complies with this distribution,
but the name P. hamulata is not written on this specimen,
therefore P. hamulata was not placed in synonymy under
P. paleacea.
EXCLUDED NAMES
Sources of information: 1, Passerina databases at
National Botanical Institute; 2, literature cited in the list;
3, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Index Kewensis on
Compact Disc (1997).
Accepted names are in bold roman type and synonyms
are in italics.
Lachnaea conglomerata L.: 560 ( 1753); 374 (1784); Willd.:
434 (1799); Wikstr.: 323 (1818); Thunb: 374 (1825a); Meisn.:
562 (1857); Cafferty & Beyers: 171. 172 (1999); Brummitt:
805 (2000) nom. rejic. = Phylica stipularis L. (Rhamnaceae)
in Cafferty & Beyers: 171 (1999).
P. ammodendron Kar. & Kir.: 444 ( 1842) = Stellera lesser-
tii C.A.Mey. in Meisn.: 550 ( 1857). Iran.
P. annua Auch. ex Meisn.: 552 (1857) = Thymelaea aucheri
Meisn.: 552 (1857); K.Tan: 235 (1980). Syria, Lebanon, W
Iran.
P. annua (Salisb.) Wikstr.: 320 (1818) = Thymelaea pas-
serina (L.) Coss. & Germ, in K.Tan: 236 (1980) [= Thymelaea
arx’ensis Lam. in Meisn.: 55 1 ( 1 857) (= Stellera passerina L.)].
Widespread: C and S Europe, SW Asia, C Russia.
P. anthylloides L.L: 226 ( 1782) = Gnidia virescens Wikstr.
in Meisn.: 592 (1857). South Africa: Cape Peninsula.
P anthylloides Thunb.: 75 ( 1 794) = Gnidia virescens Wikstr.
in Meisn.: 592 (1857). South Africa: Cape Peninsula.
P. aragonensis Rouy: 123 (1910). Pyrenees.
P. argentata Pau: 67 ( 1922) = Thymelaea argentata (Lam.)
Pau in K.Tan: 212 (1980). Spain and N Africa.
P. arx'ensis Ball: 653 (1878) = Thymelaea passerina (L.)
Coss. & Germ, in K.Tan: 236 (1980) [= Thymelaea arx’ensis
Lam. in Meisn.: 551 (1857) (= Stellera passerina L.)|.
Widespread: C and S Europe, SW Asia, C Russia.
P. axillaris Thunb.: 106 (1792) = Pimelea virgata Vahl in
Meisn.: 516 (1 857 ). New Zealand.
Passerina haccata, Pappe s.n. (NBG!, SAM!) err. typogr. =
P. ericoides L.
P. haccifera Mihi? nom. nud., Eckl. & Zeyh. s.n. (BOLI, PI,
W!) = P. ericoides L.
P. bartlingiana Meisn. True identity unknown.
P. broteriana (Cout.) Sampaio & Da Silva: 104 (1913) =
Thymelaea hroteriana Cout.: 145 ( 1909); K.Tan: 227 ( 1980).
Endemic to N and C Portugal.
P. bruniades Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Meisn.: 579 (1857) =
Lachnaea penicillata Meisn.: 579 (1857); J.B.P.Beyers: 96
(2001 ). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. brunioides Eckl. & Zeyh. in Meisn.: 563, 579 (1857) = P.
bruniades Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Meisn.
P. calocephala Meisn.: 393 (1840) = Gnidia calocephala
(C.A.Mey.) Gilg: 226-228 (1894a). South Africa: KwaZulu-
Natal and Eastern Cape.
P calycina Lam. & DC.: 360 ( 1805) = Thymelaea calyci-
na (Lapeyr.) Meisn.: 555 (1857); K.Tan: 226 (1980). C Pyre-
nees, rare,
P. campanulata E.Mey. ex Meisn.: 407 (1840) = Lachnaea
grandiflora (L.f.) Baill. in J.B.P.Beyers: 45 (2001). South
Africa: Western Cape.
P. canescens Schousb.: 190 (1800) = Thymelaea lanuginosa
(Lam.) Ceballos & Vicioso in K.Tan: 21 1 ( 1980) [= Thymelaea
canescens (Schousb.) Endl. in Meisn.: 556 (1857)]. S Spain,
Morocco and Gibraltar.
P. cantabrica Pourr. ex Willk. & Lange: 299 (1862) =
Thymelaea coridifolia (Lam.) Endl. in K.Tan: 226 (1980).
Endemic to N Spain.
P. capitata L.: 88 ( 1760) = Lachnaea capitata (L.) Crantz
in J.B.P.Beyers: 66 (2001). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. cephalophora Thunb.: 75 ( 1794) = Lachnaea eriocepha-
la L. in J.B.P.Beyers: 98 (2001). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. chamaedapbne Bunge: 58 (1833) = Wikstroemia canes-
cens Meisn.: 547 ( 1857). Nepal.
P. chamaejasme Fisch. ex Meisn.: 549 (1857) = Stellera
chamaejasme L. in Meisn.: 549 ( 1857). Siberia.
P. chamaejasme Schangin: in Meisn.: 549 (1857) = Stellera
altaica Thieb. in Meisn.: 549 ( 1857). Siberia.
P. ciliata L.: 559 ( 1753 ) = Gnidia penicillata Licht. ex Meisn.
in B. Peterson: 476 ( 1959). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. ciliata Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Lachnaea ciliata (L.) Crantz in
J. B.P.Beyers: 109 (2001 ), excluded species.
P. conglomerata (L.) Thunb.: 75 (1794); Wikstr.: 322 ( 1818) =
Phylica stipularis L. (Rhamnaceae) in Cafferty & Beyers: 171
(1999).
Passerina coridifolia Wikstr.: 334 (1818) = Thymelaea corid-
ifolia (Lam.) Endl. in K.Tan: 226 (1980). Endemic to N Spain.
P. cornucopiae - Pimelea cornucopiae Vahl in B. Hansen &
P. Wagner: 352 ( 1998). Australia.
Passerina Corsica J.Gay ex Litard. in Briq.: 6 (1938) =
Thymelaea tartonraira All. subsp. thomasii (Duby) Briq. in
K. Tan: 220 (1980) [= Thymelaea tartonraira All. var.
calvescens Gren. & Godr. in Meisn.: 556 (1857)]. Circum-
Mediterranean.
P. costata Griff.: 367 (1854) = Diarthron vesiculosum
C.A.Mey. in Meisn.: 558 (1857). Iran.
P. diarthronoides Griff.: 365 (1854) = Thymelaea passeri-
na (L.) Coss. & Germ, in K.Tan: 236 (1980) \=Thymelaea
90
Bothalia33,l (2003)
aiTensis Lam. in Meisn.: 551 ( 1857) (=Stellero passerina L.)].
Widespread: C and S Europe, SW Asia. C Russia.
P. dichotoma Steud.: 273 (1841 ) = Stellera chamaejasme L.
in Meisn.: 549 (1857). Siberia.
P. dioica Ramond: 139 (1800) = Thymelaea dioica (Gouan)
All. in K.Tan: 222 ( 1980). W Pyrenees to SW Alps.
P. dodecandra L.: 10 (1755) = Struthiola dodecandra (L.)
Druce in Levyns: 599 (1950). South Africa: Eastern Cape and
Western Cape.
P. elliptica Boiss.: 556, t. 158 (1842) = Thymelaea pubes-
cens (L.) Meisn. subsp. elliptica (Boiss.) K.Tan: 231 (1980) |=
T. elliptica (Boiss.) Endl.: 66 ( 1847)]. Endemic to S Spain.
P. empetnfolia Lapeyr.: 212 (1813) = Thymelaea dioica
(Gouan) All. subsp. dioica in K.Tan: 222 (1980). W Pyrenees to
SWAlps.
P. eriocephaia Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Lachnaea globulifera
Meisn.: 576 (1857); J.B.P.Beyers: 107 (2001). South Africa:
Western Cape.
P. fdiformis Mill.: no. 1 ( 1768) = Struthiola sp.
P. fdiformis var. ereifoifolia Eckl. & Zeyh. herb. )io. 39 (G!),
eiT. typogr. = P. ericoides L.
P. ganpi Sieb. ex Miq. in Meisn.: 564 (1857) = Stellera?
ganpi Meisn.: 550 (1857). Japan.
P. geminiflora Ram. in K.Tan: 222 ( 1980) = Thymelaea dioica
(Gouan) All. subsp. dioica in K.Tan: 222 (1980). W Pyrenees to
SW Alps.
P. giobosa Lam.: 431 (1792) = Lachnaea alpina Meisn.: 578
( 1857); J.B.P.Beyers; 59 (2001 ). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. gnidia Forst.: 28 no. 170 (1786); Meisn.: 516 (1857) =
Pimelea gnidia Banks et Sol. in Meisn.: 516 (1857). New
Zealand.
Passerina gnidia L.f.: 226 ( 1782) = Pimelea gnidia Banks
et Sol. New Zealand.
Passerina granatensis Pau: 7 (1904) = Thymelaea dioica
(Gouan) All. subsp. granatensis (Pau) Malag in K.Tan: 222
(1980). SE Spain, C and W Pyrenees.
P. grandiflora L.f.: 226 (1782) = Lachnaea grandiflora
(L.f.) Baill. in J.B.P.Beyers: 45 (2001). South Africa: Western
Cape.
P. gymnostachya Meisn.: 397 (1840). = Gnidia gymnos-
tachya (C.A.Mey.) Gilg in E. Phillips: 63 (1944). South Africa:
Nonh-West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Free State, KwaZulu-Natal
and Eastern Cape, also in Lesotho.
P. hirsuta Asso in Meisn. 555 (1857) = Thymelaea tincto-
ria (PouiT.) Endl. subsp. tinctoria in K.Tan: 223 (1980).
Portugal (?), NE and E Spain and S France.
P. hirsuta Brot. in K.Tan: 227 (1980) = Thymelaea brote-
riana Cout.: 145 (1909); K.Tan; 227 (1980). Endemic to N and
C Portugal.
P. hirsuta L.: 559 (1753) = Thymelaea hirsuta Endl. in
K.Tan: 209 (1980). Circum-Mediterranean, Europe, SW Asia
and N Africa.
P. imbricata Burm.f.: 12 (1768). True identity unknown.
P. imbricata Sennen: 69 ( 1924). True identity unknown. Spain.
P. incana Pourr. ex Willk. & Lange: 300 (1862) = Thy-
melaea velutina (Pourr. ex Camb.) Endl. in K.Tan: 221 ( 1980).
Endemic to the Balearics.
P. inconspicua Meisn.: 397 (1840) = Gnidia inconspicua
Meisn. in Arnold & De Wet: 516 (1993) \= Arihrosolen incon-
spiciiiis Meisn. 560 ( 1857)]. South Africa: Western Cape.
P. incun'ti Wendl. ex Bartl.: 404 (1840). True identity un-
known.
P. involucrata Spreng. ex Meisn.: 595 (1857) = Gnidia cap-
itata L.f. in B. Peterson: 627 (1958) ]= Lasiosiphon UnifoUus
Decne. var. giabrata Meisn.: 595 (1857)]. South Africa: Lim-
popo [Northern Province], North-West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga,
Free State, KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape, also Botswana,
Swaziland and Lesotho.
P. involucrata Thunb.: 106 (1792) = Pimelia linifolia Sm.
in B. Hansen & P. Wagner: 352 (1998). Australia.
Passerina japonica Sieb. & Zucc.: 76 (1846) = Wikstroemia
japonica Miq.: 184 (1863). Japan.
P. javanica Thunb.: 19(1 825b). True identity unknown. Java.
P. jimiperifoiia Lapeyr.: 213 (1813) = Thymelaea tinctoria
(Pourret) Endl. subsp. nivalis (Ramond) K.Tan [= Thymelaea
nivalis (Ram.) Meisn.: 555 (1857)] K.Tan: 224 (1980). En-
demic to C and W Pyrenees.
P. kalifblia Poum. ex Willk. & Lange: 301 (1862) = Thym-
elaea lanuginosa (Lam.) Ceballos & Vicioso in K.Tan: 211
(1980) [= Thymelaea canescens (Schousb.) Endl. in Meisn.:
556 ( 1857)]. S Spain, Morocco and Gibraltar,
P. laevigata L.: 15 (1756) = Gnidia oppositifolia L. in
Meisn.: 586 (1857). South Africa: Eastern Cape and Western
Cape.
P. laniflora C.H. Wright: 11 (1915) = Lachnea laniflora
(C.H. Wright) Bond in J.B.P.Beyers: 81 (2001). South Africa:
Western Cape.
P. lanuginosa Pau: 67 (1922) = Thymelaea lanuginosa
(Lam.) Ceballos & Vicioso in K.Tan: 211 (1980). Morocco, S
Spain, Gibraltar.
P. lateriflora Hort. ex Wikstr.: 347 (1818) = Gnidia spica-
ta (L.f.) Gilg in E. Phillips: 63 (1944). South Africa: Western
Cape.
P la.xa L.f.: 226 (1782) = Gnidia laxa (L.f.) Gilg: 226
(1894a). South Africa: Eastern Cape and Western Cape.
P. lessertii Wikstr.: 341 (1818) = Stellera Lessertii C.A.Mey.
in Meisn. 14: 550 (1857). Iran.
P. linariaefolia Pourr. ex Wikstr.: 333 (1818) = Thymelaea
pubescens (L.) Meisn. subsp. thesioides (Lam.) K.Tan: 231
( 1980). Spain.
P. linearifolia Wikstr.: 343 (1818) = Gnidia linoides Wikstr.
var. major Meisn.: 583 (1857).
P linearis Wendl. ex Bartl.: 404 (1840). Species non descrip-
tae. Meisn.: 563 ( 1857).
P. linoides Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Gnidia linoides Wikstr. in
Meisn.: 582 ( 1857). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. longiflora Thunb.: 189 (1800) = Pimelea longifolia
Banks et Sol. in Meisn.: 516 ( 1857). New Zealand.
Passerina longifolia Thunb.: 32 (1797) = Pimelia longifo-
lia Banks et Sol. in Meisn.: 516 (1857). New Zealand.
Passerina matnak J.F.Gmel.: 1597 ( 1792), sphalm. = P. metkan
J.F.Gmel.: 634 (1791), sphalm.
P. metnam Forssk.: 81 (1775) = Thymelaea hirsuta Endl.
in K.Tan: 209 (1980). Circum-Mediterranean, Europe, SW
Asia and N Africa.
P. metnan Forssk. in Meisn.: 564 ( 1857) = Thymelaea hir-
suta Endl. in K.Tan: 209 (1980). Circum-Mediterranean,
Europe, SW Asia and N Africa.
P. microphylla Coss. & Durand: 744 (1856) 744 = Thy-
melaea microphylla Meisn.: 556 ( 1857); K.Tan; 214 (1980). N
Africa.
P. nervosa Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Lachnaea nervosa
(Thunb.) Meisn. in J.B.P.Beyers: 69 (2001). South Africa:
Western Cape.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
91
P. nervosa Wikstr.: 328 (1818) = Lachnaea striata (Poir.)
Meisn.: 577 (1857); J.B.P.Beyers: 77 (2001 ). South Africa: West-
ern Cape.
P. nitida (Vahl) Desf.: 331, t. 94 (1798) = Thymelaea
argentata (Lam.) Pau in K.Tan: 212 (1980) 1= Thymelaea niti-
da Endl. in Meisn.: 554 ( 1857)]. Spain and N Africa.
P. nivalis Ram.: 131. t. 9 (1800) = Thymelaea tinctoria
(Pourret) Endl. subsp. nivalis (Ramond) K.Tan: 224 (1980).
Endemic to C and W Pyrenees.
P. orientalis Willd.: 431 (1799) = Thymelaea tinctoria
(Gouan) All. subsp. dioica [= Thymelaea orientalis Meisn.: 557
( 1857)] in K.Tan: 222 (1980). W Pyrenees to SW Alps.
P. passerina Huth.: 135 ( 1898) = Thymelaea passerina (L.)
Coss. & Germ, in K.Tan: 236 (1980) [= Thymelaea arvensis
Lam. in Meisn.: 551 ( 1857) (= Stellera passerina L.)]. Wide-
spread: C and S Europe, SW Asia, C Russia.
P. pentandra Thunb.: 76 (1794) = Loncho.stoma obtusiflo-
rum Wikstr. in Meisn.: 564 ( 1857).
P. persica Boiss.: 85 ( 1846) = Stellera lessertii C.A.Mey. in
Meisn.: 550 ( 1 857 ). Iran.
P. pilosa G.Eorst. in Meisn.: 564 ( 1857); B. Hansen & P. Wag-
ner: 352 (1988) = Pimelea tomentosa (J.R.Eorst. & G.Eorst.)
Druce in B. Hansen & P.Wagner: 352 ( 1998). New Zealand.
Passerina pilosa L.L: 226 (1782) = Pimelea tomentosa
(J.R. & G.Eorst.) Druce in B. Hansen & P.Wagner: 352 (1998)
(= Pimelea virgata Vahl). New Zealand.
Passerina planifolia Burm.f.: 12(1 768 ) = Lachnaea alpina
Meisn.: 578 (1857); J.B.P.Beyers: 59 (2001). South Africa:
Western Cape.
P. polycephala E.Mey ex Meisn.: 390 (1840) = Gnidia poly-
cephala (C.A.Mey.) Gilg: 227 (1894a). Namibia, Botswana
and South Africa: North-West. Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Eree
State, Eastern Cape and Northern Cape.
P. polygalaefolia Lapeyr.: 214(1813) = Thymelaea hirsuta
Endl. in K.Tan: 209 ( 1980). Circum-Mediterranean, Europe, SW
Asia and N Africa.
P. prostrata G.Eorst.: 28 ( 1 786) = Pimelea prostrata (J.R.Eorst.
& G.Eorst.) Willd. in B. Hansen & P.Wagner: 352 (1998). New
Zealand.
Passerina prostrata L.L: 227 (1782) = Pimelea prostrata
(J.R.Eorst. & G.Eorst.) Willd. in B. Hansen & P.Wagner: 352
( 1998). New Zealand.
Passerina piibescens Guss.: 451 (1843) = Thymelaea
mesopotamica (Jeffrey) Peterson in K.Tan: 239 ( 1980) [= Thy-
melaea an’ensis Lam. var. piibescens (Guss.) Meisn.: 552
( 1857)]. SE Anatolia, Iraq, W Iran, Kuwait.
P. piibescens (L.) Loscos var. virgata Pau: 33 (1925) =
Thymelaea pubescens (L.) Meisn. subsp. thesioides (Lam.)
K.Tan: 231 (1980). Spain.
P. piibescens (L.) Wikstr.: 332 ( 1818) = Thymelaea pubes-
cens (L.) Meisn. subsp. pubescens in K.Tan: 231 (1980).
Pyrenees, S and E Spain.
P purpurea Wikstr.: 323 (1818) = Lachnaea eriocephala L.
in J.B.P.Beyers: 99 (2001 ). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. racemosa Wikstr.: 320 (1818) = Stellera altaica Thieb. in
Meisn.: 549 (1857). Subalpine region, the Caucasus.
P. rosmarinifoliae fide Meisn.: 400 ( 1 840) = Phylica sp.. Herb.
Lamarck (P, microfiche 574).
Passerina ruizii (Loscos.) Eont-Quer in K.Tan: 225 (1980)
= Thymelaea ruizii [Loscos] Casav. in K.Tan: 225 (1980).
High ranges. Sierra de Cabrera in NE Portugal to C Pyrenees.
P. salina Munby = Thymelaea passerina (L.) Coss. & Germ,
in K.Tan: 236 (1980); seen from (C), specimen without collector
and number.
P. salsa Hunley, Deheaux s.n. (PR), cf. P. annua (Salisb.)
Wikstr. var. salsa Munby in K.Tan: 238 (1980) = Thymelaea
salsa Murb. in K.Tan: 238 (1980). S Spain, Morocco and
Algeria.
P. salsolaefolia Poir.: 41 (1804) = Phylica sp. in Meisn.:
400 ( 1840); Herb. Lamarck (P, microfiche 574).
Passerina sananiunda (All.) Bub.: 135 (1897) = Thyme-
laea sanamunda All. in Mei.sn.: 553 (1857); K.Tan: 233 (1980).
Spain, S Prance and Italian Riviera.
P. segobriensis Pau: 25 ( 1 887 ) = Thymelaea argentata (Lam. )
Pau in K.Tan: 212 ( 1980) [= Thymelaea nitida Endl. in Meisn.:
554 (1857)|. Spain and N Africa.
P. sericea L.: 15 ( 1755) = Gnidia sericea L. in Meisn.: 583
(1857). South Africa: Eastern Cape and Western Cape.
P. setosa Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Gnidia setosa Wikstr. in
Meisn.: 590 ( 1857). Eastern Cape.
P. spicata L.L: 226 (1782) = Gnidia spicata (L.L) Gilg in
E. Phillips: 63 ( 1944). South Africa: Western Cape.
P. stachyoides Schrenk in Meisn.: 550 (1857) = Stellera
stachyoides Schrenk in Meisn.: 550 ( 1857). Siberia.
P. stellera Ram. ex Lam. & DC.: 361 (1 805 ) = Thymelaea pas-
serina (L.) Coss. & Germ, in K.Tan: 236 (1980) ]= Thymelaea
arvensis Lam. in Meisn.: 551 (1857)]. Widespread: C and S
Europe. SW Asia, C Russia.
P. stelleri Wikstr.: 321 ( 1818) = Stellera chamaejasme L.
in Meisn.: 549 ( 1857). Siberia.
P. striata Poir.: 44, t. 291, L 2 (1804) = Lachnaea striata
(Poir) Meisn.: 415-416 (1840); J.B.P.Beyers: 77 (2001). South
Africa: Western Cape.
P. stricta Thunb.: 75 (1794) = Gnidia wikstroemiana
Meisn.: 582 (1857). South Africa: Northern Cape and Tree
State.
P. subspicala Meisn.: 395 ( 1840) = Wikstroemia subspicata
Meisn. 14: 547 (1857).
P. tartonraira Schrad.: 89 (1810) = Thymelaea Tartonraira
All. in Meisn.: 556 (1857); K.Tan: 215 (1980). Circum-
Mediterranean.
P. tenuiflora Willd.: 426 (1809) = Gnidia laxa (L.L) Gilg:
226 ( 1894a). South Africa: Eastern Cape and Western Cape.
P. tetragona Steud.: 274 ( 1841 ) = Struthiola dodecandra (L.)
Druce in Levyns: 599 (1950). South Africa: Eastern Cape and
Western Cape.
P. thesioides Wikstr.: 333 (1818) = Thymelaea pubescens
(L.) Meisn. subsp. thesioides (Lam.) K.Tan [= Thymelaea thesi-
oides (Lam.) Endl. in Mei.sn.: 553 (1857)] in K.Ttui : 231 (1980).
Spain.
P. thomasii Duby: 406 (1828) = Thymelaea tartonraira
All. subsp. thomasii (Duby) Briq. |= Thymelaea tartonraira
All. var. calvescens Gren. & Godr. in Meisn.: 556 (1857)] in
K.Tan: 220 ( 1980). Circum-Meditenanean.
P. thunbergii Wik.str.: 343 (1818) = Gnidia sericea L. in Meisn.:
583 ( 1857). South Africa: Eastern Cape and Western Cape.
P. thymelaea (Lam.) DC. in Lam. & DC.: 366 (1815) =
Thymelaea sanamunda All. in Meisn.: 553 (1857); K.Tan:
233 ( 1980). Spain. S Erance and Italian Riviera.
P tinctoria Pourr. in Meisn.: 565 (1857) = Thymelaea tinc-
toria (PouiT.) Endl. subsp. tinctoria in K.Tan: 223 (1980).
Portugal (?), NE and E Spain and S Erance.
P. tinctoria var. angiistifblia Boiss.: 556 (1842) = Thymelaea
calycina Meisn.: 555 (1857); K.Tan: 226 (1980). C Pyrenees, raie.
P. tingitana Salzm. ex Meisn.: 554 ( 1 857 ) = Thymelaea vil-
losa (L.) Endl. in K.Tan: 229 ( 1980). S Portugal, Spain, Gibral-
tar, Morocco.
92
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
P. tomentosa Wikstr.: 332 (1818) = Thymelaea tartonraira
All. in Meisn.: 556 (1857); K.Tan: 215 (1980). Circum-Mediter-
ranean.
P. imiflora Drege ex Meisn.: 574 (1857) = Gnidia penicil-
lata Licht. ex Meisn. in B. Peterson: 476 (1959), \=Cryptadenia
ciliata (Thunb.) Meisn. in J.B.P.Beyers: 45 (2001), excluded
species].
P uniflora L.: 560 ( 1753) = Lachnaea uniflora (L.) Crantz
in J.B.P.Beyers: 43 (2001). South Africa: Western Cape.
P imiflora L. vai: alba P.J.Bergius: 129 (1767) = Lachnaea
grandiflora (L.f.) Baill. in J.B.P.Beyers: 45 (2001). South
Africa: Western Cape.
P. uniflora L. var. angustifolia Bumr.f.: 12 (1768). = Lach-
naea uniflora (L.) Crantz in J.B.P.Beyers: 43 (2001). South
Africa: Western Cape.
P. uniflora L. var. latifolia Burm.f.: 12 ( 1768). = Lachnaea
grandiflora (L.f.) Baill. in J.B.P.Beyers: 45 CiOOl). South
Africa: Western Cape.
P. uniflora L. var. purpurea P.J.Bergius: 128 (1767). =
Lachnaea uniflora (L.) Crantz in J.B.P.Beyers: 43 (2001).
South Africa: Western Cape.
P. velutina Boiss.: 81 (1838) = Thymelaea pubescens (L.)
Meisn. subsp. elliptica (Boiss.) K.Tan: 231 (1980). Endemic to
S Spain.
P. velutina [Pourr.] Cambess.: 183 (1827) = Thymelaea
velutina (Pourr. ex Camb.) Endl. in K.Tan: 221 (1980). Ende-
mic to the Balearics.
P. vesiculosa Fisch. & C.A.Mey.: 170 (1839) = Diarthron
vesciculosuni C.A. Mey. in Meisn.: 558 (1857). Iran.
P. villosa Thunb.: 106 (1792) = Pimelea arenaria Cunn. in
Meisn.: 517 (1857). New Zealand.
Passerina villosa Wikstr.: 332 ( 1318) = Thymelaea villosa
(L.) Endl. in Meisn.: 554,(1857); K.Tan: 229 (1980). S Portugal
and Spain, Gibraltar, Morocco.
P. virescens Coss. & Dur. ex Meisn.: 554 ( 1 857) = Thyme-
laea virescens Meisn.: 554 (1857); K.Tan: 212 (1980). NW
Africa.
P. virgata Desk: 331, t. 95 (1798) = Thymelaea virgata
(Desk) Endl. in K.Tan: 228 (1980); subsp. virgata from NW
Africa and S Spain & subsp. broussonetii from NW Africa.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Abel s.n. (19) NBG. Abrahams s.n. & A7759 (7) GRA, MO, PRE.
Acocks 184, 583, lOOI, 5756 ( 1 ) S; 690 (6) S; 1005 (4) S; 1006 (1) S;
1007, 1549 (15) S; 1067, 1519 (14) S; 2482 (16) S; 10660, 12125,
12175 (4) PRE; 10967 (7) PRE; 16000, 18634, 19000, 21252, 22862.
24427 (15) K, PRE; 19066 (6) K, PRE; 19810 (14) K, NBG, PRE;
20170 (15) M. PRE; 20714, 21309, 23379, 23848, 24257 (14) PRE;
21424 (20) K, M, PRE; 21455 (7) M, PRE; 22365 (20) PRE; 22528,
22606, 22615 ( 1 ) PRE; 22608 (12) K, PRE; 22784 ( 6) PRE; 24212 ( 1 )
K, NBG PRE; 24213 (12) K, NBG, PRE. Adamson 1515 (10) PRE;
5124 (15) PRE. Alexander-Prior s.n. ( 1 ) PRE; s.n. (14) PRE, Allardice
1726 (15) NBG. Anderson 76 (1) PRE. Andersson s.n. ( 14) S. Andraea
385, 385b (6) NBG, PRE; 581 (1) NBG, PRE; 597 ( 14) PRE; 979, 982
(15) NBG. PRE; 1018, 1030 (15) PRE; 1222, 1288, 1288A (10) PRE;
1227 (14) NBG. Archibald 677 (4) GRA; 3833 (20) GRA; 4552/52 (7)
GRA. PRE; 4558, 5259 (20) K, PRE; 5583, 5727, 6053 (14) PRE.
lialkwill 456 ( 15) K PRE. Balsinhas & Ker.sberf> 2114 (4) PRE. Barber
745 (4) GRA. Barbo.w 9447 (4) K. Barker .149 (14) PRE; 2726 (6)
NBG; 5565 (20) NBG; 5925 (15) C, NBG; 6036 (19) NBG, S; 10580
(15) NBG. Barnard 526, 699 (20) PRE; 660 (14) PRE; s.n. (10) NBG;
s.n. (14) NBG. Barnes 88 ( 14) GRA. Bayer 786 (4) PRE; 1307(1) MO.
Bayliss 521 ( 15) K, MO, PRE; 546 (20) K, M, MO. NBG; 650 (1) K,
MO, M, PRE; 1.149, 1362, 1432 (4) PRE; 1684 (15) PRE; 2468 ( 14) B,
MO, NBG; 502.1(14) M, MO; 5035 (14) B, MO; 5164 (20) MO; 5238,
5289 (14) MO; 6017 (7) PRE; 6060, 6093 (15) PRE; 6117 (14) PRE;
6856, 8850 (20) M, MO; 6861 (20) K, MO, S; 7731, 8908 ( 15) M, MO;
BRI B32 (14) GRA, MO, PRE; BRI B295 (19) PRE; BRI B1088 (20)
PRE; BRI B1105 ( 14) PRE. Bean 1385 (15) BOL, MO, NBG. Bean &
Viviers 1508 (14) BOL. Behemiae s.n. (14) PR. Bengis 344 (15) PRE.
Beverly 72 (4) PRE. Blom 275 (4) PRE. Boemert, Herb. Reg.
Monacense s.n. (14) M. Bolmen 94.04 (7) PRE; 4012 (12) C, PRE;
4065 (12) NBG, PRE; 4911, 8147 (7) NBG, PRE. Bolton s.n. (20)
DUB. Bolus 170 (14) BOL, K; 687 (5) BM, BOL, HAL, K, NBG, P,
PRE, UPS, W; 1905 (20) BOL; 2924 (14) K; 2926 ( 1 ) K; 4498 (6) BM,
BOL, K; 77650 (15) BM, BOL; 17197 (1) BOL; s.n. (1) BOL, PRE;
s.n. ( 14) BOL. Bond 1820 ( 15) NBG. Borges 112 (4) M, PRE. Boshojf
156 (15) NBG. Bot. Mus. Univ. Wien s.n. ( 14) WU. Botha 372 (7) PRE;
2610 (4) PRE; 2618 ( 14) PRE; 5656 (20) GRA. Botha & Coetzee 1605
(7) PRE. Boucher 468, 469(1) NBG, PRE; 470 (1) K; 767, 7955, 2012,
2014, 2449, 3243, 3301 ( 14) PRE; 856 (6) K, NBG, PRE; 1559a (15)
NBG, PRE; 7605 (1) PRE; 7677 (7) PRE; 1690 (7) NBG, PRE; 1691
(6) NBG; 1862a, 1862b (4) NBG; 2008 (15) PRE; 2279 ( 1 ) NBG, PRE;
2224 (12) NBG; 2244, 2439 (15) PRE; 2951 (1) NBG, PRE; 5565 (7)
NBG; 5975 (6) PRE. Boucher & Shepherd 4828 (14) PRE. Bower 602
(7) PRE. Bowie 1 (6) BM; 5 (20) BM; 5 ( 19) BM. Bowker s.n. (7) K.
Brain 6950 (4) MO, PRE. Bredenkamp 889-891, 893-895 (4) PRE;
896 (14) PRE; 897-899 (7) PRE; 900 (20) PRE; 901-903 (14) PRE;
904 ( 15) PRE; 905, 906 (20) PRE; 907 (14) PRE; 908, 909 ( 1 1 ) PRE;
977, 975 (7) PRE; 972 (14) PRE; 914 (20) PRE; 975 (19) PRE; 976
(14) PRE; 977(19) PRE; 918(14) PRE; 979 (15) PRE; 920, 927 (19)
PRE; 922 (15) PRE; 925 (12) PRE; 924-927(14) PRE; 928-930 (15)
PRE; 957 (14) PRE; 952 (12) PRE; 955, 954 (12) PRE; 955 (7) PRE;
956 ( 14) PRE; 957, 95S ( 1 ) PRE; 959 (12) PRE; 940 ( 1 ) PRE; 943-945
(14) PRE; 946, 947 (12) PRE; 948 (1) PRE; 949, 950 ( 1 ) PRE; 957, 955
(14) PRE; 952, 954 ( 1 ) PRE; 955 ( 14) PRE; 956 (6) PRE; 957-959 ( 14)
PRE; 960, 967 (1) PRE; 962 (6) PRE; 963-965 (14) PRE; 966-968,
970, 971 (15) PRE; 974 (14) PRE; 979, 9S0( 14) PRE; 7075, 7074 (7)
PRE; 1018-1021 (13) PRE; 1022-1026 (4) PRE; 7055 ( 16) PRE; 7545,
1546 (5) PRE; 1549, 1554 (15) PRE. Brehm.: Herb. Reg. Monacense
s.n. (14) M. Breijer TRV 16577 (14) PRE; TRV 16898 (14) PRE.
Bremekamp & Schweickerdt 417 (4) PRE. Bremer 299 ( 1 4) BOL. Brink
232 (20) GRA, K, PRE; 924 (15) GRA. Britten 130 (19) PRE; 1245
(15) GRA; 7655 (15) GRA, PRE; 2259 (14) PRE; 2562 (14) GRA;
2828 (14) PRE; 5008 (14) GRA, PRE; 5014 (1) GRA; 5489, 5522 (14)
PRE; 5525 (15) PRE; 5812 (19) GRA, PRE. Britton 72 (1) NBG.
Brooker-Leslie s.n. (15) GRA. Brown 490 (14) PRE; 28S58 (19) PRE.
Bryce s.n. (4) K. Buchenau s.n. Buff 760610-2/1 (7) WU. Buitendag
104 (4) NBG, PRE. Burchell 473, 3835, 6163, 6721 ( 14) K; 4049, 7463
(1) K; 6109 (19) K, PRE; 7129(10) K; 7767 (5) K, M; S5S9 ( 1 ) K.
Burgers 1015, 2186 (1) PRE; 1188, 2270 (14) PRE; 7464 (20) PRE;
2259 (12) PRE; 2268 (1) NBG, PRE; 2924 (7) NBG. Burke 45 (14) K,
PRE. Burrows 2464 (19) PRE; 5066, 5956 (14) GRA; 5595 (7) GRA;
4118, 4682(15) GRA. Burtt-Davy 2410 (7) K.
Campbell 13541 ( 19) NBG. Capener CF/2 (19) PRE. Cattell & Cattell
167 (15) NBG. Catterrell 41 (4) PRE. Cha.se 592 (4) BM, PRE. Codd
3602 (7) PRE, K; 8772 (4) PRE; Codd & De Winter 3237 (4) PRE;
Codd & Dyer 4473 (4) PRE. Cole s.n. (14) TCD. Collector unknown
s.n. ( 14) S; (6) BOL, P, W; (6) S; 770 ( 14) S; ( 19) S. Comins 1930 (1)
PRE. Compton 2241, 21048, 21236, s.n. (4) NBG; 10633 (6) NBG;
77594 (1) NBG, S; 9172, 13486, 13600, 15996, 22941, 23625, 24363
(1) NBG; 18159 (1) MO, NBG; 18278 (15) M, NBG; 18380, 18449
(15) NBG; 79950 (1) C, NBG; 20274 (19) NBG; 21673 (14) C, MO;
22722 ( 1 ) BOL, NBG; 22218 (10) NBG, S; 22289 (6) NBG, S; 22870
(10) C, NBG; 2884(15) BOL, NBG; 5005, 5766, 5975 (14) BOL, K;
3835 (15) BOL, NBG; 5725, 7427, 7438, 7498 (15) NBG; 7422 (19)
NBG; 75S4 (19) C; 9066, 14743 ( 12) NBG; s.n. (7) S. Cooper 15 (7)
GRA; 625 (4) BM, BOL, K, TCD; 702 (4) BM, BOL, K, M, PRE,
TCD; 842 (4) BOL, K; 2301 (7) K; 2502 (4) K. Corneliussen 1875 (6)
C. Cowling 51 (14) GRA; 796 ( 1 1 ) GRA; 926 (15) GRA; 7225 (20)
GRA; 1419 (19) GRA; 5456 (1) NBG. Crawford 384 (1) PRE. Cross
58 (15) MO, NBG. Cruden 57 (15) NBG. Cummings s.n. (14) GRA.
Curator Bloemfontein Museum 4 (4) PRE. Curator Pretoria Botanical
Garden P42 (10) PRE; s.n. (4) PRE. Cur.son & Irvine 91 (4) PRE.
Dacombe s.n. (14) GRA. Dahlgren & Peterson 168 (14) M; 7667 (4)
B, K. Dahlstrand 148 (1) MO; 1285 (19) C; 7490 (15) C, MO, NBG,
PRE; 1905 ( 19) MO, PRE; 2836, 2849, 2850, (20) C, GRA, MO, NBG,
PRE; 2949 (1) NBG, PRE; 5257 (20) C, GRA, MO, NBG, PRE.
Davidson 24904 ( 14) PRE. Davidson & Mogg 32859, 32881 (4) UPS;
32909 (4) PRE. Davies 33 (14) PRE; 48954 (4) PRE. De Beer TRV
16536 (14) PRE. De Kock 134 (14) PRE. De Kruifll58 (4) PRE. Dead
34 (4) PRE. Dela Bat s.n. ( 1 ) NBG. Devenish 712 (4) BM. K. M, NBG,
PRE. Dieterlen 49 (4) K, MO, NBG, PRE, S; 1247 (4) NBG, PRE.
District Fore.st Officer 97 (7) GRA. Dobay 45 (15) NBG. Dold 840 (4)
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
93
GRA; 1063 (20) GRA; 7099 (14) GRA; 7677, 20S3 (4) GRA; 2299
( 15) GRA. Doube// 27 ( 15) GRA. Downing 401 (6) NBG, PRE. Drege
85 ( 14) UPS; 285 { 14) GRA; 2570 ( 10) K, PRE; 3006 (20) GRA, PRE;
s.n. (1) S; s.n. (7) K, MO; s.n. (10) BM. NBG, S; s.n. (14) MO, P; sji.
(14) S. W; s.n. (19) K; TRV10800 (14) PRE. Dn Toit 755 (15) PRE.
Dunne s.n. (4) BM. Duthie 533 (7) NBG; 7577 (16) BOL. Du.x de
Wurte s.n. ( 14) M. D\er 179, 780 ( 14) PRE; 596 ( 15) K, PRE; 597 (14)
GRA, K, PRE; 752-754 (4) GRA, K, PRE; 960, 967 ( 15) K. PRE; 962.
967, 968 (14) GRA, K. PRE; 965-966 (14) GRA, PRE; 970 (14) PRE.
Ehersohn 136 ( 14) NBG. Ecklon 7.77 ( 14) B, S; 508 (14) BOL, HAL.
M, PR. PRE. S. W; 590 ( 14) S; 598 (20) S; s.n. (6) C; s.n. (12) S; s.n.
(14) C. Ecklon & Zexher 37 (14) MO. S; 700/72 (14) S; 58 (19) MO;
59 (6) BOL, G, MO. P, W; 40(70.10) ( 14) B. BREM, C, MO, S, W; 41
(14) MO; 98 (15) BOL; 3781 (11) G, HAL, P. PRE, S, W, WU; 3782
(14) NBG, W; 7381 (11) BREM, K, P. PRE, WU; ^.n. (1) PRE; s.n. (7)
BREM. NBG, S; s.n. ( 10) C, UPS; s.n. ( 1 1 ) C, S, UPS; s.n. ( 14) BREM.
GRA. MO. WU; s.n. (15) WU. Edwards 973. 974 (13) BOL, PRE;
1991 (4) PRE; 2259, 2276, 4058, 4196 (4) K, PRE; 4187 (4) K. MO.
PRE; 17260 (20) BM. Eicker 1 (1) PRE. Elan-Puttick 146 (4) PRE.
Erlangli 1017 (14) M. Esteriniysen 781 (14) MO; 961, 23319. 27139a
( 14) BOL; 7855 ( 1 ) BOL; 7998. 8978, 23446, s.n. (15) BOL; 3016 (12)
BOL; 6634 (19) BOL; 6678 (11) K, NBG; 6962. 10733 (11) BOL;
11148 (10) BOL; 12189 (9) BOL; 16295 (14) PRE; 25522 (12) MO;
26714. 35616 (5) BOL. K; 29153 (4) BOL; 29962 (16) BOL, MO;
33533a (5) BOL M; 34537, 36404 (5) BOL, K. S; 35415 (5) BOL;
35504 ( 1 ) BOL, C, M, MO; 35507 ( 1 ) S. Euckermann 7889 ( 7) PRE.
Euston-Brown 41 (11) BOL. Exles 8527 (4) K, S; Eyles Herbarium
7945 (4) BM.
Fellingham 169 (15) NBG, PRE; 202 (14) PRE; 773 (1) C, PRE.
Ferreira 5 (4) PRE. Flanagan 418 (7) NBG, PRE; 1478 (14) BOL;
1635, 1892 (4) K. NBG. PRE. S. Fokkens 5 (7) PRE. Forrester &
Gooyer203 (4) PRE. Foiiche s.n. (7) PRE. Fourcade 74 (19) BOL, K;
741 (15) BOL. K, GRA; 952 (14) BOL, GRA; 7478 (14) BOL, GRA.
K. PRE; 7484 (14) BOL, K; 1646 (20) BOL; 1708 (U) BOL, K, NBG,
PRE; 1806 (7) K, PRE; 1806 (1) NBG; 3043 (11) MO, PRE; 4417(20)
BOL; 4624, 4625 (15) BOL; 5747 (20) BOL; 5747 (20) NBG; 5940
(20) BOL, PRE. Frankish 253 (7) MO. Franks s.n. (4) PRE. Fries
2248, 2496 (4) K. MO. Fries. Nordlindh & Weimarck 3077 (4) M.
Gafijex 11 (7) MO. PRE. Gcdpin 778 (15) PRE; 257 ( 14) PRE; 2028 (4)
K. PRE; 5565 (7) PRE; 4491 (12) K, PRE; 4492 ( 20) GRA. K, PRE;
6825 (4) K; 6825 (4) PRE; 8279 (14) PRE; 9555 (7) K, PRE; 10146 (4)
PRE; 14018, 14573, 14578, s.n. (4) BOL, PRE, S. Garside 497 (1) K;
502 (6) K; 7577 ( 1) K. Gentry 18995 (14) PRE. Germishuizen 4024 (15)
PRE; 4077. 4097 (U) PRE. Gerrard 95 0) K. Gerstner 705 (14) PRE;
Gerstner 119, s.n. (4) PRE. Gibbs Russell 4094 (1) PRE. Giess 1293 (6)
M; 9014, 9429, 13136 (4) M. PRE. Gijfen s.n. (4) GRA. Gilfdlan 7 (7)
GRA. Gill 240 (4) BOL. Gillett814. 7072 (1 ) NBG; 7207 (7) PRE; 7986
( 15) NBG; 5457(6) NBG; 4556 (19) BOL. PRE; 4556 (19) K. Gilliland
881 (4) BM; 904. 905 (4) BM, K; 7785. 2025 (4) BM. Glen 1089 (6)
PRE; 1568 ( 15) C, PRE. Glen & Glen 3911 (4) PRE. Goldblatt 2599 ( 1 )
MO. PRE. S; 4144 (12) MO, NBG, PRE; 4380 (10) MO, NBG.
Goldblatt & Manning 9589 (15) NBG. Goldsmith 15/73 (4) K, MO.
PRE. Goossens 375 (4) PRE). Gormlex & Barber 23 (4) PRE. Greater
21500(1) PRE; 27577(14) PRE; 27845 (14) B. PRE; 22780 (15) PRE.
Grey 4 ( 1 ) C. Grobbelaar 63 ( 19) PRE. Grobler 454 (14) NBG, PRE.
Grondahls.n. (14) S. Guthrie 17413 (1) BOL; 77474 (6) BOL.
Hafstrdm s.n. (14) S. Hardy 6894 ( 4) PRE. Harvey 691 (6) BM.
Hebblethwaite s.n. (4) GRA. Hedberg & Hedberg 82060 (4) UPS. Hemm
1 (4) PRE. Hendricks 13 (1) GRA. Henkel s.n. (4) K. Henrici 3701 { 12)
BOL; Henrici s.n. (12) NBG. Hepburn 85 (4) GRA. Herb. Banks &
Swartz s.n. ( 1 ) S. Herb. Banks & Wikstr. ( 1 ) C. Herb. Bot. Hauniense s.n.
( 14) C. Herb. J. Peterstein acc. no. 16/1946 (14) PR. Herb. Poeppig s.n.
(14) M. PRE. Herb. Praga Karlin, Herb, scholae med. (14) PR. Herb.
Reg. Monacense s.n. ( 14) M. Herb. Schmidel s.n. ( 14) M. Herb. Scholae
Lincopensis s.n. ( 14) S. Herb. Schreberianuin s.n. (14) M. Herb. Sieber
89 (14) S. Herb. Swartzii s.n. (14) S. Herb. Thunberg 9578 (7) UPS;
9579, 9596D (1) UPS; s.n. (14) UPS; s.n. (19) UPS. Herbst 5269 (4)
PRE. Heydoom 10 (4) PRE. Hlendlmaxr s.n. (6) M. Hilger 22 (4) M,
PRE; 85/60 (14) M. Hilliard & Bunt 7139 (4) MO, S; 7220 (4) PRE;
11726. 13511 (4) K, S; 72275 (4) PRE. S; 13970, 18071 (4) PRE; 14654
(15) PRE; 16921 (4) M. PRE, S; 17703, 18443 (4) PRE, S; 18570 ( 13)
K, M. P. PRE. S. Hilliard 4081 ( 14) K. PRE; 5797 (4) MO, PRE. Hdner
184 (1) PRE. Hoekstra 75 ( 15) NBG. Hoener 1635, 1846 (4) MO, PRE,
S. Hojfenthal 3464 (4) K. Holland 3699 (7) BOL. Homan s.n. (4) M.
Hoole 10 (20) GRA, PRE; J1 (7) GRA. Hopkins B1580, 17165 (4) K,
PRE; s.n. (4) K. Hubbard 224 (\) NBG. Hugo 1241 (14) PRE; 1405 ( 19)
K. NBG. PRE; 1453 (15) K. PRE; 7972 (7) C. M, PRE; 7992 (7) NBG.
PRE; 2079 (14) NBG, PRE. Humbert 11018, 15801 (4) NBG; 9908 (19)
PRE. Huntley 125 (4) PRE. Hutchin.son 143(1) BOL, K, PRE; 749 (1)
BOL, GRA, K, PRE; 665 (6) K. PRE; 7707 (15) BM. K, PRE; 7704 (15)
K. PRE; 1624 (4) BM. K. PRE; 1748 (1) K, PRE. Hutchinson, Forbes &
Verdooni 75 (4) PRE. Hutton 1603 ( 14) K; s.n. (1) TCD.
Ihlenfeldt 1652 (14) PRE.
Jacobsen 1340 (4) PRE; 7587 (7) PRE; 3468 (4) PRE. Jacobsz 1379, 1482
(4) PRE; 2603 (4) NBG. PRE; 575 (4) PRE; 664 (4) PRE. Jacot-
Guillannod 230, 298, 765, 780, 1546, 1792 (4) PRE; 5225 (4) K, PRE;
3824 (4) GRA; 7464 (15) PRE; 7670 (14) GRA; 7854 (4) GRA, PRE;
9842, 9886 (4) GRA, PRE; 70005 (14) GRA, PRE; 20776 ( 1 ) GRA; s.n.
(15) GRA. Jacot-Guillannod & Brink 29 ( 14) GRA; 47 (7) GRA. PRE.
Jangle 156 ( 16) PRE. Johnson 102 (20) M, NBG; 1069 (7) GRA. K, PRE.
JohiLstone 543 (4) MO. PRE, S. Jordaan 97 (4) PRE; 655 ( 1 ) PRE. Joubert
s.n. (14) S. Jules Verreau.\ s.n. ( 14) TCD. Junod TRV17326 (4) PRE.
Kapp 1 (14) PRE. Keet 873 (7) NBG; 1152 (19) PRE; s.n. (4) NBG.
Kemp 1184 (4) MO, PRE. Kemslex 141 (1) GRA. NBG. Kerfoot 8102
(4) PRE. Kers 3240 (4) S). Killick 1071. 1585 (4) PRE; 1973, 2289 (13)
PRE; 4225 (4) MO, PRE; 4485 (4) PRE. Killick & Strex 2386 (4) M,
PRE. King 1 ( 14) BM, M, MO, PRE. Kluge 797, 1995 (4) PRE; 2044
(4) PRE. Knafs.n. (14) PR. Krause s.n. (6) NBG; s.n. (1 ) M. Krynauw
789 (4) PRE. Kiintze s.n. (1) K; s.n. ( 14) K.
Laidler 372 (15) NBG. PRE. Lam & Meeu.se 4272 (1) S; 4660 (19)
MO. Lamhinon & Reekmuns 82/157 (4) PRE. Lansdell s.n. (14) PRE.
Lanyokwe 97. (14) GRA. Laubert s.n. (6) S. Laubner s.n. (1) K.
Lavranos 3700 (15) PRE; 11652 (14) PRE. Le Jobs s.n. (14) S. Le
Munch 387 (4) K. Leighton 7855 ( 1 ) PRE; 27775 ( 1 2 ) BOL. Leitz 182b.
s.n. ( 14) M. Letts' 142 (14) PRE; 269 (4) PRE. Levyns 1515, 2371 (10)
BOL; 2505. 2349, 2414, 2813, 5538, 6314, 6514, 6626, 6627, 8029,
9140, 9145, 9741, 9743, 15495 (15) BOL; 2525, 2550, 5765. 4445,
9603, 9644, 10833, 10873 (14) BOL; 5700 (6) BOL; 5707, 10291,
10832, 10867 (7) BOL; 5040, 7842 (19) BOL; 8236 (13) BOL; 8274,
9409, 9553 (4) BOL; 9577, 9674, 9726 (12) BOL; 9725 ( 1 ) BOL. Lewis
77 (1) NBG; 1795, 7796(15) NBG; 7797(15) NBG, PRE. Liehenberg
6574 ( 20) PRE; 7299 (4) K, NBG. PRE. Lindeberg s.n. (1) S. Linder
3980 (4) BOL. K. PRE. Lindley s.n. (14) S. Linnaeus 504.5 (6) LINN.
Long 386 ( 15) K, PRE; 790 ( 14) GRA, PRE; 798 (7) K. PRE; 809 (20)
PRE; 7067 (20) GRA. PRE. Louw 2373 (4) NBG. Louwrens A7763
( 14) GRA. Lubke 274 (4) PRE, M; 1782, 2312 (1) GRA; 7867. s.n. ( 14)
GRA. Lutjeharms 6818 (4) PRE. Lynes 1737 (20) BM; 7927 (14) BM.
MacOwen 705 (14) GRA, K. TCD; 705 (15) GRA; 103 (20) GRA, K. S;
5404 (6) K. Maguire 1127 (\A) M; 7270 (15) NBG. Manson 747 (19)
PRE. Marloth 1585, 2756, 6189, 6218, 10693, 10912 (14) PRE; 4273,
6862, 10964, 11283, 12724, 12785, 74728 (15) PRE; 5648 (6) B, PRE;
6244, 75044 (19) PRE; 9695 (10) PRE; 70877 (10) NBG, PRE; 11873
(4) PRE; 13012 (1) PRE; s.n. (6) PRE. Marsh 547 ( 1 ) K, PRE; 572, 7567
(14) PRE; 594 ( 19) K, PRE; 1327 (7) NBG. PRE. Marshall 130, 757 ( 15)
NBG; 244 (15) NBG, PRE. Martin s.n. (6) GRA; s.n. (7) GRA; s.n. (19)
GRA. Masson s.n. ( 1 ) BM; s.n. (20) BM. Matthews 284 (15) PRE; 7755
( 15) NBG. Matthews & Van Rensburg 1036 (4) PRE). Mauve 5246 (4)
PRE. Mauve & Hugo 167 (14) MO, PRE. McDonald 819 (14) NBG,
PRE; 2725, (10) NBG. McDonald & Morley 1005 ( 15) BM, NBG, PRE,
TCD. McKinnon s.n. (14) NBG. McKitterick 12 (7) GRA. McMurtiy 335
( 15) PRE. Meebold 9965 (4) PRE; 75757, 75755, 75759, 75760 (14) M;
15154 (6) M; 15158 (4) M; 15755 (7) M. Meinkaujf s.n. ( 14) M; s.n. (19)
M. Mellersh 617 (4) TCD. Mendes 866 (4) BM; 5805 (4) K, M.
Merxtniiller 591 (4) M. Meyer 106, 1061, 9429 (4) M. Michell 24 (14)
PRE; 77, 526 ( 15 ) PRE; 555 ( 10) PRE. Miller 2701 (1) PRE; 5875, 3847,
4644 (4) K, PRE. Milton 2 (16) BOL. Mitchell. Pammenter & Spencer
B4-11 (1) PRE. Mogg 3347, 7083 (4) PRE; 75220 (7) K. PRE; 17383 (4)
PRE; s.n. (1) PRE. Moll 1228 (4) K, PRE; 2466 (7) K, PRE. Montgomery'
18 (20) NBG. Morley 21 (12) PRE; 92 (14) M, PRE. Morris 596 (19)
NBG. Mortensen 200 ( 14) C. Moss 5644 (16) BM; 5760 ( 1 ) BM. Moss
& Rogers 1263 (4) BM. Mostert 1185 (4) PRE. Mudd s.n. (4) K. Muir
12, 240 ( 14) NBG, PRE; 14(1) PRE; 2441 (12) PRE; 4469 ( 14) K. PRE;
4485 (15) BOL, PRE; 4496 ( 1 ) K, PRE; 4558 ( 14) PRE; 685 ( 14) BOL,
PRE. Mund s.n. (19) BM, NBG. Munro s.n. (15) PRE. Museum
Botanicum Hauniense s.n. ( 1 ) C; (6) C; s.n. (7) C; s.n. (14) C.
Nanni 123 (7) PRE. Nel 219 (4) PRE. Niven & Laubert s.n. (5) S. N.J.A.
s.n. (6) S. Noel 322 ( 14) GRA; Noel s.n. (1) GRA; s.n. (19) GRA.
Obermexer 258, 1078, TRV30044 (4) PRE. O'Callaghan 273, 752 (14)
PRE; 708 ( 1 ) NBG; 859 (7) NBG. PRE; 7005 (7) GRA; 1425 (7) NBG.
Oldenland, Herb. Schreb. s.n. (14) M. Oldevig-Roberts 120 (7) S.
Olivier 778 (15) M, PRE; 595 (19) K, PRE; 2027 (7) PRE; 2988 (14)
94
Bothalia33,l (2003)
GRA: 3024 (7) GRA; 3197 (11) PRE; 3679 ( 15) K. PRE; 3797, 4555,
5194 (15) PRE; 5226, 5342 (14) PRE; 10318 (15) NBG. Onderstall
919, 1269 (4) PRE. Orchard 312 ( 14) C, MO. PRE, S. Osbeck s.n. ( 14)
S. Osborne 126 (1) GRA.
Page 97 (15) PRE. Palmer 1094 (15) PRE; 1417 (4) GRA; 3932 (20)
GRA. Pappe s.n. (6) NBG; s.n. (7) S; s.n. (14) GRA; s.n. (14) NBG.
Parker 3843 (UK NBG; 4109 ( I ) K. PRE. Parsons 60. 182 (7) NBG; 61,
112 (\) NBG; 169 (14) PRE; 772 ( 19) PRE; 322 (7) NBG. PRE. Paterson
1123 (7) GRA; 270 (20) GRA; 833 (15) BOL; S83 ( 15) PRE; TRV25754
(20) PRE. Paterson- Jones 697 (7) NBG. Pedro & Pedrogao 8095 (4)
BOL. PRE. Peeters. Gericke & Burelli 387, 407 (4) MO, PRE. Pegler234
(7) PRE. Penther 2891 (14) M, S, W; s.n. (14) M, S. Perold & Fourie
2256 (4) PRE. Peterson 1263 ( 16) BOL. Phillips 228 (4) PRE; 1294 ( 14)
NBG; 1503 (15) NBG; 1622, 3363A. B (7) K, PRE; s.n. (14) NBG.
Phillipson 624 (4) MO, UPS; 1140 (4) K, PRE. Pillans 2792 (14) BOL;
3779 (14) BOL, PRE; 3783 (1) BOL, PRE; 7689 (9) BOL; 8030 {\ 4)
BOL; 8513 (6) BOL; 9240 ( 1 ) BOL; 17158 (10) NBG; s.n. ( 1 ) GRA; s.n.
( 14) BOL, MO. Pole Evans 129. 986 (4) PRE; 4373 (6) PRE. Pons s.n.
(4) PRE). Potts 1281 (14) PRE; BLF1300 ( 14) PRE; BLF288 (7) GRA,
PRE; s.n. (14) NBG. Priinos 47 ( 10) PRE. Prosser 2050 (4) PRE. Purcell
s.n. (7) NBG; s.n. ( 14) NBG. Putterill s.n. (4) PRE.
Quickelberge A7758 (1) GRA.
Raal & Rctal 296 (4) PRE. Raitt s.n. (15) PRE. Rcnmav 1592 (14) GRA.
Rattray 382 (4) BOL; 909 (4) K; s.n. (4) PRE. Rauh & Schlieben 9788 (4)
M, PRE. Rechinger A-4413 (4) M. Reed 35 ( 14) GRA. Relvn s.n. ( I ) M.
Renny 179 (4) PRE; Rennie 480 ( 14) BOL, GRA; Rennie 2613 (4) BOL).
Repton 6253 (4) PRE. Retief 12 (20) PRE; Retief 1194 (7) MO. PRE.
Rivers-Moore s.n. (7) GRA, Rob & Fries 3395 (11) UPS, S. Roberts 1953,
1954, 1973, 2001, 3359 (4) PRE. Robinson 1873 (4) K, MO. Rodin 1305
(19) BOL, K, MO, PRE. Rogers 788, 21919, 23675 (4) PRE; 4724,
15512, 16701, 26983 ( 14) K; 16701 A, 16705 ( 15) K, PRE; 16703, 17222
( 15) K; 17281 ( 14) BM; 26574 ( 14) GRA, NBG, PRE; 26774, 26790 (7)
PRE; 26987, 27077 ( 14) K, PRE; 27004 (19) BM, NBG. PRE; 27026 ( 14)
PRE; 28018 (7) GRA; 28983 ( 19) GRA, NBG. Rosenberg & Rnthetford
308 (12) NBG. Rourke 1204 ( 14) K. PR. PRE, S; 1505 (7) K, NBG; 3000
(14) NBG. Rutprum s.n. (14) S. Rvcroft 1331 (1) NBG; 2135 (6) NBG;
3000 ( 19) S; 3117(H) S; s.n. ( I ) K, S,' TCD.
Salter 6220 ( 1 ) BM, K; 6352 (19) BM, BOL, K; 7051 (6) K; 9370 (14)
BM; s.n. (14) BOL. Sankey 69 (4) K, MO. Savage Cat. 504.2 ( 1 ) LINN.
504.3, Sp. 161 (1) LINN. Sc/w/f 7073 ( 1 1 ) PRE; 7023 (19) PRE; 1067
(ID PRE; 1069, 15h (15) PRE; 1578, 2001, 2005 (19) NBG, PRE;
7596 (11) NBG. PRE; 7689 (19) K, NBG, PRE; 7958 (II) PRE; 7959
DDK, PRE; 7967 (20) K, PRE; 1985, 2002 (19) PRE; 2033 ( 19) GRA,
PRE. Scheepers 1831 (4) MO, PRE. Schlechter 1363 (1) C, PRE.
Schlieben s.n. (4) M. Schmidel s.n. (14) M. Schmidt 41 (15) PRE; 567,
569 ( 14) M; 56 (4) PRE. Schmitz 8265, 8314 (4) PRE. Schonland 3054
(11) GRA, PRE; 3398, 3525 ( 14) GRA, PRE. Schrire 1869 (15) GRA;
1968, 1969, 2037, 2038 (20) GRA; 2083 (19) GRA, Scliweickerdt 759
(4) PRE. Seutloali 94 (4) PRE, Shearing 870, 891 (15) PRE. Shumane
P58 (20) GRA. Sidey 1219 (20) S; 7696, 1812 ( 14) MO, PRE, S; 2372
(15) MO, NBG, S; 3595, 3801 ( 14) PRE, S, Sieber 74 ( 14) BOL, HAL,
M, NBG. P. PRE, S, W. Sieber & Zeyher s.n. ( 14) MO. Sim 1 (7) GRA;
20 (14) K; 68 (4) K PRE; 1380, 1499 ( 14) C, NBG; 1471 (4) K; 19659
( 14) PRE; 2595 (4) K. Simon 657 (4) K, PRE. Simpson 97 ( 15) NBG,
PRE. Smart 15512 (14) PRE. Smit 22 (A) PRE. Smith 4637, 4649, 5081
(14) PRE. Smuts 91 (4) PRE; 1134 (6) PRE; s.n. (7) NBG; s.n. (14)
NBG, Smuts & Gillett 2162 (4) BOL, NBG, PRE; 2469 (4) PRE; 3179
(4) NBG. Smuts & Pole Evans 933 (4) BOL, K, Snyman s.n. (7) GRA.
Sparrmun s.n. ( I ) S; s.n. (7) M, S; s.n. ( 14) S; s.n. ( 19) M, S. Stam 43,
174, 429 (4) PRE. Staples 17 (4) PRE). Starke s.n. (15) NBG, PRE.
Stayner 24 (14) GRA, PRE. Stephen 455 (7) PRE. Stokoe 1790, 1811
(10) PRE; 2542, 3199 (5) PRE, K; 2800, 2802, 22329 (5) BOL, K,
NBG, PRE; 6335, 8677, 8977( 15) BOL; 8226 (16) BOL; s.n. ( I ) NBG;
s.n. (5) NBG, PRE; s.n. (14) NBG; s.n. (15) NBG, PRE. Stopp 70 (7)
M. Story 2071 (4) MO, PRE; 3109 ( 14) PRE; 3162 (20) PRE; 3559 (19)
K, M, PRE; 3667 (4) PRE; 3778 (4) GRA PRE; 3885 ( 14) GRA; 3896
(4) GRA, PRE; 3899, 3900 (4) PRE. Strau.ss s.n. (12) NBG. Strey 715
( 1 ) PRE; 6769 (7) PRE; s.n. ( 14) M, Sutherland 185B (4) TCD; s.n. (4)
K; s.n. (7) K. Swartz s.n. (6) M. Symons 144 (4) PRE.
Taylor 2953 (7) PRE; .1413 (20) NBG, PRE; 3802, 8166 ( I ) NBG, PRE;
3803 (12) PRE; 4042 (6) K, M, PRE; 4143, 8367 (7) NBG; 5281, 7987,
7988 (14) PRE; 6211, 9871 (6) NBG, PRE; 6996 ( 1 ) NBG, PRE, S; 7123
( i ) K, MO, PRE; 7562 ( 1 5) K, PRE; 8998 (7) PRE. S; 9356 ( 15) K, MO,
PRE; 9879, 9905, 10144 (7) NBG, PRE; 10022 ( I ) PRE, K; 10171, 10249
(7) MO, NBG, PRE. Teague 312 (A) BOL, K. Theron 282 (7) PRE; 63/
(14) PRE; 1076 (7) PRE, K; 2097( 14) PRE; 2782 (4) PRE; 2276 (14) M.
PRE. Thodav 73 (14) NBG; 42 (14) NBG; 52 ( 14) BOL, NBG; 700, (16)
C, NBG, PRE; 272, 212A (10) BOL, K, NBG; 274 (15) BOL, NBG; 216
( I ) K, NBG, PRE. Thode 993 ( 19) K, MO, PRE; 7720 ( 14) PRE; 1639 (4)
PRE; A292 (4) K, MO, PRE; s.n. (4) NBG. Thomas s.n. (A) GRA.
Thompson 1427 (15) NBG; 1856 ( 19) PRE; 1874 (20) PRE; 2005, 2757
(15) NBG, PRE; 3300 ( 14) PRE; 3303 (14) MO, PRE; 3378 (14) K, MO,
PRE; 3374 (15) PRE; 880 (19) K, PRE; 903 (20) NBG, PRE. Thunberg
s.n. (14) UPS, Topper 122 (1) NBG. Torre & Perreira 12683 (4) C.
Toughton 156 (14) GRA. Trauseld 435 (13) PRE; 860(13) PRE. Trinity
College s.n. (14) TCD. Tyson 77 (10) GRA; 1449 (19) K, NBG, PRE;
2178 (20) K, NBG; s.n.. TRV17233 ( 7) PRE.
Ueckermunn 7793 (19) PRE.
Vuhrmeijer & Tolken 252 (7) PRE. Van Breda 131 (15) PRE; 639 (15)
K; 679 (14) PRE; 754 (15) K, PRE; 823 ( 1 ) PRE; 1037 (7) PRE; 7633
(I) PRE; 1664 (14) PRE. Van Dam TRV 23994 (14) PRE. Van der
Merwe 964, 7225 (14) PRE; 7708 (12) PRE; 7786 (1) PRE; 2420 (15)
K, PRE; s.n. (A) K, PRE. Van der Schijjf4478, 4836, 5592, 5845, 6191
(A) K, PRE; 5376 (4) PRE. Van der Walt 250 ( 15) PRE; 409 (14) PRE.
Van der Westhuizen 144, 147 (7) PRE. Van der Zeyde s.n. (4) MO,
NBG, S. Van Jaarsveld & Sardien 10998 (20) PRE. Van Niekerk 95
(19) NBG. Van Rensburg 151 (14) PRE; 442 (15) PRE; 443 (1) K, M,
NBG, PRE; 444 (14) PRE; 459 (7) NBG; 2147 (1) PRE; 2148 (14)
PRE. Van Schalkwyk 46 (7) PRE. Van Vuiiren 1632 (4) PRE. Van
Wilgen 763 (14) PRE. Van Wyk 390(H) K, PRE; 7545 (7) PRE, PRU;
1736 ( 12) M, PRE; 1920 (14) PRE, PRU; 2517(1) PRE, PRU; 2899 (4)
PRE. PRU; 3167 (7) PRE, PRU; 6704 (4) PRE, PRU. Van Zinderen
Bakker 12 (6) NBG. Van Zyl 3366 ( 15) NBG, PRE. Venter 7123, 11013,
12721 (4) PRE. Victor 400 (15) PRE; 498 (14) PRE. Vlok 1235 (15)
PRE. Von Gedow 473 ( 14) GRA.
Wager TRV10772 (A) PRE. Wahl 42 (19) NBG; Wall 30. s.n. (15) S; s.n.
(6) S; s.n. (7) S; s.n. (14) S. Wallich s.n. (19) K. Walsh s.n. (6) NBG.
Walters 7(15) NBG; 247, 1084 (6) C, NBG; 384, 7077 (15) K, M, NBG,
PRE; 7769 ( 1 5) NBG; 2143 ( 14) NBG. Ward 549, 2167, 4374, 5735, 7211
(7) PRE; 6944. 6954 (4) PRE; s.n. ( 14) TCD. Watt & Brandwijk 1851 (4)
PRE. Wawra 3 (14) M, PRE. Weigend2341 (1) M. Wells 2998(H) PRE;
s.n. (14) MO. Welman 798 (4) PRE. Weltz 743 (15) NBG, Wendelberger
406 (15) PRE. Werdermann & Oberdieck 476 ( 14) B, PRE; 691, 693 ( 14)
B, PRE; 1129 (A) K, PRE; 1560 (4) B, K, PRE; 1560 (4) K. Werger 1054
(A) PRE; 1806 (A) MO. PRE. West 181 (13) PRE; 358 (20) GRA; 485,
1392 (4) PRE. Westfall 716, 756 (A) PRE. White 95 ( 14) GRA; 5230 ( 1 )
PRE. Wild 1352 (4) K, PRE. Willetme 805 ( 12) NBG, PRE. Williams 440
(1) K MO; 7008 (7) K, M; 7457 (14) NBG; 2624 (14) MO, PRE.
Williamson s.n. (20) TCD. Wilman s.n. (14) PRE. Wilms 2277 (7) K.
Wirminghaus 178 (14) GRA. Without collector 170 (15) TCD; s.n. (7)
TCD; s.n. (10) TCD. Wolley-Dod 1575 (1) PRE, K; 7878 (6) BOL, K;
2927 (1 ) BM, K. Wood 12179 (4) NBG; 1712 (1) BM, BOL, K; 4036 (A)
BOL, K, GRA; 5786 (7) M, MO; 6592 (1) S; 6607, 11405 (4) BM. K;
9739 (7) BOL, NBG; s.n. (A) NBG, K; s.n. (1) PRE. Worsdell s.n. (1)
NBG. Wright 1029 (4) PRE; s.n. (1) K, MO, P, TCD; s.n. (6) C, P; s.n.
(14) K; ,?.H. (14)TCD. Wurtz 208 (2Q) NBG; 7270(15) NBG; 727/ (14)
NBG; 1567 ( 1 ) NBG; 2/27 ( 19) NBG.
Youthed 663 (20) GRA,
Zantovska 720 (15) PRE. Zeyher 34 (\ A) NBG; 38 (19) BOL; 47 (11)
G, S; 42 (6) NBG; 44 ( 1 1 ) G, NBG, S, W; 777.77 (4) S; 756 (20) BM,
BOL, K, NBG, TCD; 277 (19) BOL, K, NBG, TCD; 405 (7) TCD,
GRA; 1025 (11) BM, NBG, TCD; 3777 (7) NBG; 3778 (19) NBG;
3779 (20) BM, MEL, NBG, S W; 3780 ( 1 1 ) G, P, S, W; s.n. (6) NBG;
s.n. ( 14) C, K, MO, P; s.n. (19) S. Zietsman 323 (4) PRE, Zietsman &
Zietsman 427, 512 (A) PRE,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the following institutions
an(J persons: the National Botanical Institute for the
opportunity to do research in a professional and academ-
ic environment and for financial support; Prof. G.F.
Smith, Director Research and Dr M. Koekemoer, curator
of the National Herbarium for their support; directors
and curators of the herbaria that provided material on
loan. Mmes G. Condy and A. Stadler for the line draw-
ings and Dr O.A. Leistner for translating the diagnoses
into Latin; Ms S. Turck, graphic artist at PRE, for all the
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
95
technical drawings and Ms H. Steyn for producing high
quality distribution maps; Mmes E. Potgieter and A.
Fourie, librarians of the Mary Gunn Library, for their
friendly assistance and Ms E. du Plessis for technical
editing.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS. J.RH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Sun-ery of South Africa No. 57: 85-87.
ADANSON. M. 1763. Families des plantes. Vincent. Paris.
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP ( APG). 1998. An ordinal classi-
fication for the families of llowering plants. Annals of the Mis-
souri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
ARCHANGELSKY, D.B. 1971. Palynotaxonomy of the Thymelae-
aceae s.l. In L.A. Kuprianova & M.S. Jakovlev, Pollen mor-
phology: 104-234. Academy of Science, USSR. Komarov
Botanical Institute, Leningrad (in Russian).
ARNOLD. T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds). 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Siin'ey of
South Africa No. 62: 1-825.
BALL, J. 1878. Spicilegium Florae Maroccanae. Journcd of the Linnean
Soae/y 16: 281-742.
BARTLING. EG. 1840. Passerina incun’a. Linnaea 14: 404.
BENTHAM. G. & HOOKER. J.D. 1880. Genera plantariim. vol. 3.
Cramer. Weinheim.
BERGIUS. P.J. 1767. Descriptiones plantarum ex Capitae bonae Spei.
Salvius, Stockholm.
BEYERS. J.B.P. 2001. The Cape genus Lachnaea (Thymelaeaceae): a
monograph. 11: 1-115.
BIGGS, C.. KNIGHT, R.. RAITT. L.M. & KEATS. D. 2001. The use
of vegetation indicators for the assessment of coastal erosion in
Milnerton South Africa. 27th Annual Conference of the South
African Association of Botanists. RAU. Johannesburg. Un-
published.
BOISSIER, PE. 1838. Elenchus plantarum novarum. Lador & Ramboz,
Geneve.
BOISSIER, PE. 1 842. Voyage botanique dans le midi de I 'Espagne 2. Paris.
BOISSIER. PE. 1846. Diagnosis plantarum orientalium novarum 1.
Herman, Leipzig.
BOLUS, H. & WOLLEY-DOD, A.H. 1904. A list of the flowering
plants and ferns of the Cape Peninsula, with notes on some of
the critical species. Transactions of the South African Philo-
sophical Society 14: 207-373.
BOND. P, & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora: a
descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany Suppl.
vol. 13. National Botanic Gardens of South Africa, Claremont.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 1996. Palynology of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): relationships, form and
function. Grana 35: 335-346.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1999. Structure of mucila-
ginous epidermal cell walls in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae).
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 129: 223-238.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2000. The epidermis in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): structure, function and taxonomic
significance. Bothalia 30: 69-86.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2001a. Leaf anatomy of the
genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): taxonomic and ecological
significance. Bothalia 31: 53-70.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2001b. Taxonomic signifi-
cance of inflorescences, floral morphology and anatomy in
Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia 31: 213-236.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2002a. Systematics of
Passerina truncata and a new subspecies monticola. Bothalia
32: 65-71.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2002b. Passerina quadri-
faria (Thymelaeaceae): a new species from the southern Cape
and Little Karoo in South Africa. South African Journal of
Botany 68: 304—307.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2002c. A new species of
Passerina from Western Cape, South Africa. Bothalia 32: 76-79.
BREDENKAMP. C.L. & VAN WYK. A.E. 2002d. Taxonomy of the
Passerina filiformis complex (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia 32:
29-36.
BREYNE, J. 1678. Exoticarum plantarum centuria. David-Fredericus
Rhetius, Gdansk.
BRUMMITT, R.K. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. 1992. Authors of plant names.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
BUBANI, P. 1897. Flora Pyrenaea, vol. 1. Ulrico Hoepli, Milan.
BUNGE, A. A. VON. 1 833. Enumeratio plantarum, quas in China boreali.
Collegit St Petersburg.
BUNNIGER, L. 1972. Untersuchungen liber die morphologische Natur
des Hypanthiums bei Myrtales- und Thymelaeales-Familien.
Beitrdge zur Biologic der Pfianzen 48: 79-156.
BURDET. H.M. 1979, Cartulae ad botanicorum graphicem. XV. Candol-
lea 34: 203, 204.
BURMAN, J. 1739. Rariorum Africanarum plantarum. Henricum Bous-
siere, Amsterdam.
BURMAN, N.L. 1768. Flora indica: cui accedit series zoophytorum
indicorum. nec non prodromus florae capensis. Cornelius Haak,
Leiden; Johannes Schreuder, Amsterdam.
CAFFERTY, S. & BEYERS, J.B. 1999. Proposal to reject the name
Lachnaea conglomerata (Rhamnaceae). Taxon 48: 171, 172.
CAMBESSEDES, J. 1827. Enumeratio plantarum quas in in.tulis
Balearibus. Belin, Paris.
CLUSIUS, C. 1601. Rariorum plantarum historia. Joannem Moretum.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik. Johan-
nesburg.
COSSON. E.S. & DURAND, E.M. 1856. Passerina microphylla.
Bulletin de la Societe de France 3: 744.
COUTINHO, A.X.P. 1909. Thymelaea broteriana. Boletim da Socie-
dade Broteriana 24: 145.
DESFONTAINES, R.L. 1798. Flora Atlantica, vol. 1. Desgranges, Paris.
DOMKE, W. 1934. Untersuchungen tiber die .systematische und geo-
graphische Gliederung der Thymelaeaceen. E. Schweizer-
bart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nagele) G.M.B.H.,
Stuttgart.
DREGE. J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente. In E.
Meyer. Besondere Beigabe zur Flora 2: 44-229. Reginsburg,
Leipzig.
DREGE. J.F. 1847a. Standorter-Verzeichniss der von C.L. Zeyher in
Sudafrika gesammelten Pfianzen. Linnaea 19: 584-591.
DREGE. J.F, 1847b. Vergleichungen der von Ecklon und Zeyher und
von Drege gesamelten sudafrikanischen Pfianzen (so weit
dieselben noch vorhanden) mit den Eksemplaren von Zeyher's
neuesten Sammlungen, welche derselbe zum Verkauf stellt.
Linnaea 20: 183-258.
DUBY, J.E. 1828. Aug. Pyrami de Candolle. Botanicon gcdlicum 1 . Mme
ve Bouchard-Huzard, Paris.
ENDLICHER, S.F.L. 1847. Generum plantarum supplementum quar-
tum. part 2. Fr. Beck, Vienna.
FARR. E.R.. LEUSSINK, J.A. & STAFLEU, F.A. 1979. Index nomi-
num genericorum (plantarum). Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.
FEDER. N. & O'BRIEN, T.P 1968. Plant microtechnique: some prin-
ciples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55:
123-142.
FISCHER. F.E.L. VON. & MEYER, C.A. 1839. Passerina vesiculosa.
Bulletin de la Societe des naturalistes de Moscow. 170.
FORSSKAL. P. 1775. Flora aegyptiaco-Arabica. Mbller. Copenhagen.
FORSTER. G. 1786. Florulae insularum australium prodromus. Got-
tingen.
GANDOGER. M. 1913. L’herbier africain de Sonder. Bulletin Societe
Botanique de France. Paris: 414-422.
GILG, E. 1894a. Thymelaeaceae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien
3,6a: 216-245.
GILG, E. 1894b. Studien Uber die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der
Thymelaeales und liber die ‘anatomische Methode’. Botani.sche
Jahrbiicher 18: 489-574.
GMELIN, J.F. 1791. Sy sterna naturae, part. 1. Georg Emanuel Beer,
Leipzig.
GMELIN, J.F. 1792. Systema naturae, part. 2. Georg Emanuel Beer,
Leipzig.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus of
the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical
Institute, Cape Town and Missouri Botanical Garden.
GREUTER, W., MCNEIL, J., BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DE-
MOULIN, V, FILGUEIRAS, T.S., NICOLSON, D.H., SILVA,
PC., SKOG, J.E., TREHANE, P, TURLAND, N.J. & HAWKS-
WORTH, D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature {Saint Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Konig-
stein.
GRIFF, W. 1854. Notulae ad plantas asiaticas 4. Bishop’s College
Press, Calcutta.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981, Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
96
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
GUSSONE, G. 1843. Flora Siculae Synopsis 1. Tramater, Naples.
HANSEN, B. & WAGNER. R 1998. A catalogue of the herbarium
specimens from Captain Cook's first and second expeditions
housed in the Copenhagen Herbarium (C). AUertonia 7: 352.
353.
HARVEY, W.H. 1868. Order CV. Thymeleae. In J.D. Hooker, The gen-
era of South African plants 2: 323-327,
HEINIG. K.H. 1951. Studies in the floral morphology of the
Thymelaeaceae. American Journal of Botany 38: 1 13-132.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BLIRTT, B.L. 1987. The botany of the southern
Natal Drakensberg. Annals of the Kirstenhosch Botanic
Gardens 15. National Botanic Gardens, Cape Town.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BLIRTT, B.L. 1988. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: XIV. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 45: 77-94.
HOLMGREN, K.. HOLMGREN. N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum. International Association for Plant
Taxonomy, New York Botanical Garden, New York.
HUTH, E. 1898. Passerina passerina. Helios 11: 135.
lUCN Species Survival Commission 2000, lUCN Red List Categories.
approved by the 51st Meeting (ff the lUCN Council. Gland.
Switzerland.
JACKSON, B.D. 1917-1918, Linne-Tulbagh correspondence in pos-
session of the Linnean Society, being a fifth contribution to-
wards the history of the Linnean collections. Proceedings of the
Linnean Society 130, Suppl. 1-13: 5-13,
JUSSIEU, A.L. DE. 1789. Genera plantarum. Viduam Herissant & Theo-
philum Barrois, Paris.
KARELIN. G.S. & KIRILOV. I.P. 1842. Passerina ammodendron.
Bulletin de la Societe des naturalistes de Moscou 15: 444.
KARNOVSKY, M.J. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of
high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell
Biology 27: 137a.
LAMARCK, J.P.A.P.M. DE. 1792. Tableau encyciopedique et metho-
dique. Botanique (Illustration des genres) 2. Pancoucke, Paris.
LAMARCK. J.P.A.P.M. DE & CANDOLLE, A.P. DE. 1805. Flore
Frangaise, vol. 3. Agasse, Paris.
LAMARCK. J.P.A.P.M. DE & CANDOLLE, A.P. DE. 1815. Fiore
Frangaise, vol. 6. Desray, Paris.
LAPEYROUSE. P.P. DE. 1813. Histoire abregee des plantes Pyrenees.
De rimprimerie, de Bellagarigue. Toulouse,
LEANDRI. J. 1930. Recherches anatomiques sur les Thymeleacees.
Annales des Sciences Naturales Botanique 12: 125-237.
LEVYNS, M.R. '1950. Thymelaeaceae Reichb. In R.S. Adamson &
TM. Salter. Flora of the Cape Peninsula: 594-603. Juta, Cape
Town.
LINNAEUS, C. 1737. Hortus Cliffortianus. Amsterdam.
LINNAEUS, C, 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS. C. 1754. Genera plantarum. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1755. Centuria I. plantarum. Hojer, Uppsala.
LINNAEUS, C. 1756. Centuria //. plantarum. Hojer, Uppsala.
LINNAEUS. C. 1760. Amoenitates academicae 6. Godofriedum Kiese-
wetter, Leipzig.
LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Sy.stema naturae, edn 12, 2. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS. C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum altera. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1784. Systenui vegetabilium, edn 14 (edn J.A. Muiray).
Dieterich, Gottingen.
LINNAEUS, C. fil. 1782. (‘1781') Supplemenium plantarum. Impen.sis
Orphanotrophei, Brunswick.
LITARDIERE, R.V DE, 1938. Passerina Corsica. In J.I. Briquet, Prodrome
de la (lore cor.se 3: 6. Lechevalier. Paris.
LODDIGES, C. 1816. Catalogue of plants. Plummer & Brewis, London.
LUBKE, R.A. 1998a. Dune Thicket. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo.
Vegetation of South Africa. Le.wtho and Swaziland: 15. Depart-
ment of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
LUBKE. R.A. 1998b. Terrestrial ecology. In R. Lubke & I. de Moor, Field
guide to the eastern and southern Cape coasts 26: 402-343.
University of Cape Town Press, Rondebosch.
LUBKE, R.A, & VAN WIJK. Y. 1998, Terrestrial plants and coastal
vegetation. In R. Lubke & I. de Moor, Field guide to the east-
ern and .southern Cape coasts 2 1 : 289-343. University of Cape
Town Press, Rondebosch.
MABBERLEY, D.J. 1989, The plant-hook. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
MAGALLON, S., CRANE. PR. & HERENDEEN, PS. 1999. Phylo-
genetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of cudicots. Annals
of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297-372.
MARLOTH, R. 1925. The flora of South Africa, vol. 2,2. Darter, Cape
Town.
MEISNER, C.F. 1840. Passerina L. Linnaea 14: 390-404.
MEISNER. C.F. 1857. Ordo CLXVII. Thymelaeaceae. In A.L. PR de
Candolle, Prodromus systematis naturalis 14: 493-605. Masson,
Paris.
MEYER. C.A. 1843. Remarques sur les genres de Daphnacees sans
ecailles perigynes, et exposition des caracteres des ces genres.
Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Seconde Se'rie, Botanique 20:
45-53.
MILLER, P. 1768. The gardener's dictionary, edn 8. London.
MIQUEL, F.A.W. 1 863. Annales niusei botanici lugduno-batavi, vol. 3.
C.G. van der Post, Amsterdam.
NORLINDH, T. & WEIMARCK. H. 1958. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der
Flora von Sud-Rhodesia X. Botaniska Notiser 3: 623-631,
PALMER, E, & PITMAN. N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa, vol. 3.
Balkema, Cape Town.
PAU, C. 1 887. Notas hotanicas a la flora espanola 1 . Escuela Tipografia
del Hospicio, Madrid.
PAU, C. 1904. Passerina granatensis. Carta botdnicos 1: 7.
PAU. C. 1922. Passerina argentata. Memories del Museu de Ciencies
naturals. Barcelona. Ser. Bot. L, No. I: 67.
PAU, C. 1925. Passerina pubescens (L.) Loscos var. virgata. Memories
del Museu de Cihicies naturals. Barcelona. Ser. Bot. I .. No. 3: 33.
PETERSON, B. 1958. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der Flora von Siid-Rhodesia
10. Botaniska Notiser 111: 625-628.
PETERSON, B. 1959, Some interesting species of Gnidia. Botaniska
Notiser \\2: 465^80.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1944. Notes on some genera of the Thymelaeaceae.
Journal of South A frican Botany 10: 61-66.
PLUKENET, L. 1700. Almagesti botanici mantissa. Sumptibus autoris,
London.
POIRET, J.L.M. 1 804. Encyclopedic methodique (Dictionaire Encyclo-
pe'dique de botanique) 5. Paris.
PRESL, C.B. 1844. Botanische Bemerkungen. Gotlieb Haase Sdhne, Prague.
RADFORD, A.E., DICKISON, W.C., MASSEY, J.R. & BELL, C.R.
1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, New York.
RAFINESQUE, C.S. 1836. Flora telluriana, part 4. Auctore C.S. Rafi-
nesque, Philadelphia.
RAMOND DE CARBONNIERES, L.F.E. 1 800. Passerina dioica. Bulletin
de la Societe philomatique de Paris 41: 131.
REBELO, A.G. 1998. Fynbos Biome, In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo,
Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: 62-74.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
ROUY, G.C. 1910. Flore de France, vol. 12. Foucaud, Rochefort.
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW. 1997, Index kewensis on Compact
Disc. The Word Factory and System Simulation Ltd., Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
SAMPAIO, G.A. & DA SILVA, F. 1913. Herbaria Portugues. Tipo-
grafia Costa Carregal, Porto.
SAVAGE, S. 1945. A catalogue of the Linnaean Herbarium. Linnean
Society of London,
SCHOUSBOE, P.K.A. 1800. lagttagelser over Vextriget: Marokko. K.H.
Seidelin, Copenhagen.
SCHRADER, H.A. 1810. Passerina tartonraira. Neues Journal fur die
Botanik 4,\: &9.
SENNEN, F. 1924. Passerina imbricata. Annales de la Societe lin-
neene de Lyon: 69.
SIEBOLD. P.F &ZUCCARINI, J.G. 1846. Florae japonicae familiae
naturalis, vol. 2. Lugdini batavorum, Leiden.
SIM, T.R. 1919. Flowering trees and shrubs for use in South Africa.
The Speciality Press of South Africa, Johannesburg.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common names of South African plants. Memoirs
of the Botanical Sun’ey of South A frica No. 35: 589. Botanical
Research Institute, Pretoria.
SMUTS. L.M. 1996. Pas.serina paludosa. Information system for en-
dangered plants. Cape Nature Conservation, Stellenbosch,
STAFLEU, FA. & COWAN, R.S. 1986. Ta.xonomic literature, vol. 6.
Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.
STEARN, W.T. 1973. Botanical Latin, edn 2. David & Charles, Newton
Abbott.
STEUDEL, E.G. VON. 1841. Nomenclator botanicus, edn 2. Cottae,
Stuttgart.
STORY, R. 1952. A botanical survey of the Keiskammahoek District,
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 27: 1-184,
Department of Agriculture, Pretoria.
TAKHTA.IAN, A.L. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering
plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
TAN, K. 1980. Studies in the Thymelaeaeeae II: a revision of the genus
Thymelaea. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
38- 189-246.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
97
THODAY. D. 1924a. XVIll. A revision of Passerina. Bulletin of Mis-
cellaneous Information, Kew A'. 146-168.
THODAY, D. 1924b. XLIV. Passerina: type specimens. Bulletin of Mis-
cellaneous Information, Kew 10: 387-389.
THODAY, D. 1925. The geographical distribution and ecology of Passe-
rina. Annals of Botany 39: 175-208.
THUNBERG, C.R 1792. Museum naturalium Academiae upsaliensis 13.
Typis Edmannianis, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.R 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium, part 1 . Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.R. 1797. Museum naturalium Academiae upsaliensis 22.
Typis Edmannianis, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.R. 1 800. Prodromus plantarum capensium, part 2. Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.R. 1825a. CXXIX Passerina. In I. A. Schultes, Flora capen-
sis: 374—378. Cottae, Stuttgardt.
THUNBERG, C.R. 1825b. Florida javanica. vol. 2. Excudebant Ralmblad
et C., Uppsala.
TOURNEFORT J.R 1719. Institutiones rei herbariae. Typographia Regia,
Raris.
VAN ROYEN, A. 1 740, Florae Leydensis Prodromus. Leyden.
VAN TIEGHEM. R.H. 1893. Reserches sur la structure et les affmites des
Thymeleacees et des Reneacees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles
Botanique 7,17: 185-294.
VAN WYK, A.E. & VAN WYK, R. 1997. Field guide to trees of southern
Africa. Struik, Cape Town.
VAN WYK, B-E. & GERICKE, N, 2000. People's plants. Briza Rublica-
tions, Rretoria.
VICTOR, J.E. 2002. South Africa. In J.S. Golding, Southern African
plant Red Data Lists. Southern African Botanical Diversity
Network Report No, 14: 93-120.
VON BREITENBACH. J.. DE WINTER, B., BOYNTON, R„ VAN
DEN BERG. E., VAN WYK, B. & VAN WYK, E. im\. Pocket
list of southern African indigenous trees: including selected
shrubs and woody climbers. 1st abridged impression of edn 4.
Briza Rublications & Dendrological Foundation, Rretoria.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK. M.G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa, edn 2,
Livingstone, London.
WEIMARCK, H. 1941. Rhytogeographical groups, centres and inter-
vals within the Cape tlora. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, sen 2,
37: 37^3.
WENDLAND, J.C. 1798. Botanische Beobachtungen. Gebriidem Hahn,
Hannover.
WIKSTROM, J.E. 1818. Granskning af de till Thymelaearum Viix-
tordning horande Sliigten och Arter. Kunglinga Svenska Veten-
skapsakadeiniens Handlingar 39: 265-355.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1 799. Caroli a Linne, Species plantarum, vol. 2. Nauk,
Berlin.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1809. Enumeratio plantarum. In taberna Libraria
Scholae realis.
WILLKOMM, H.M. & LANGE. J.M.C. 1862. Prodromus florae his-
panicae 1 . E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae, In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,2: 1-81. Reeve, London.
INDEX TO TAXA
(ALSO DOUBTFUL AND EXCLUDED NAMES)
Arthrosolen inconspicuus Meisn., 90
Balendasia Raf., 61
Chymococca Meisn., 61
empetroides Meisn., 71
Cryptadenia ciliata (Thunb.) Meisn., 92
Lachnaea
ciliata (L.) Crantz, 89
conglomerata L., 89
conglomerata L. sensu Meisn., 71
conglomerata L. sensu Thunb., 66
paleacea, 66
Lasiosiphon linifolius Decne. van glabrata Meisn,, 90
Lonchostoma Wikstr., 61
obtusiflorum Wikstr. nom. illeg., 61
Rasserina L.. 60. 61
Sectio Pentamerae Meisn., 61
Sectio Tetramerae Meisn.. 61
ammodendron Kan & Kin. 89
annua Auch. ex Meisn., 89
annua (Salisb.) Wikstr., 89
var. salsa Munby. 91
anthylloides L.L, 89
anthylloides Thunb., 89
aragonensis Rouy, 89
argentata Rau, 89
arvensis Ball, 89
a.xillaris Thunb., 89
baccata, 89
baccifera Mihi?, 89
bartlingiana Meisn., 89
broteriana (Cout.) Sampaio & Da Silva, 89
bruniades Eckl. & Zeyh, ex Meisn., 89
brunioides Eckl. & Zeyh., 89
burchellii Thoday, 70
calocephala Meisn., 89
calycina Lam. & DC., 89
campanulata E.Mey. ex Meisn., 89
canescens Schousb., 89
cantabrica Rourr. ex Willk. & Lange, 89
capitata L., 89
cephalophora Thunb., 89
chamaedaphne Bunge, 89
chamaejasme Fisch. ex Meisn., 89
chamaejasme Schangin, 89
ciliata L., 89
ciliata Thunb., 89
comosa (Meisn.) C.H. Wright, 76
conglomerata (L.) Thunb., 89
coridifolia Wikstr., 89
cornucopiae, 89
Corsica J.Gay ex Litard.. 89
corymbosa Eckl. ex C.H. Wright, 81
costata Griff., 89
cupressina J.C.Wendl., 85
cupressoides Steud., 85
diarthronoides Griff., 89
dichotoma Steud., 90
dioica Ramond, 90
dodecandra L., 90
drakensbergensis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt., 80
elliptica Boiss., 90
empetrifolia Lapeyn, 90
ericoides L., 71, 89
ericoides sensu Meisn., 66, 69, 73
ericoides sensu Thunb., 66
eriocephala Thunb.. 90
eriophora Gand.. 73
esterhuyseniae Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 75
falcifolia (Meisn.) C.H.Wright, 85
falciformis Drege, 76
filiformis L. pro parte, 85
filiformis L., 85
subsp. filiformis, 85
subsp. glutinosa (Thoday) Bredenk. &. A.E.van Wyk, 85
var. comosa Meisn., 76
var. crassifolia Eckl. & Zeyh., 71
var. divaricate! Wikstr., 86
var. ereifoifolia Eckl. & Zeyh., 90
var. falcifolia Meisn., 86
var. squarrosa Meisn., 87
var. vulgaris Meisn., 81
filiformis Milk, 90
filiformis sensu C.H.Wright, 81
galpini C.H.Wright, 79
galpinii C.H.Wright, 78
ganpi Sieb. ex Miq., 90
geminiflora Ram., 90
globosa Lam., 90
glome rata sensu Meisn., 71
glomerata Thunb. sensu Thoday, 63
98
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
glomerata sensu Thunb., 66
gnidia Forst., 90
gnidia L.f., 90
granatensis Pau, 90
grandiflora L.f., 90
gymnostachya Meisn., 90
hamulata Gand., 89
hirsuta Asso, 90
hirsuta Brot., 90
hirsuta L., 90
imbricata Burm.f., 90
imbricata Sennen, 90
incana Pourr. ex Willk. & Lange, 90
inconspicua Meisn., 90
incurva Wendl. ex Bartl., 90
invohicrata Spreng. ex Meisn., 90
involucrata Thunb., 90
japotiica Sieb. & Zucc., 90
javanica Thunb., 90
juniperifolia Lapeyr., 90
kalifolia Pourr. ex Willk. & Lange, 90
laevigata L., 90
laniflora C.H. Wright, 90
lanuginosa Pau, 90
lateriflora Hort. ex Wikstr., 90
laxa L.f., 90
lessertii Wikstr., 90
linariaefolia Pourr. ex Wikstr., 90
linearifolia Wikstr., 90
linearis Wendl. ex Barth, 90
linoides Thunb., 90
longiflora Thunb., 90
longifolia Thunb., 90
matnak J.F.Gmeh, 90
metkan J.F.Gmeh, 90
metnam Forssk., 90
metnan Forssk., 90
microphylla Goss. & Dur., 90
montana Thoday, 68
montivaga Bredenk. &. A.E.van Wyk, 85
montivagus Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 85
nervosa Thunb., 90
nervosa Wikstr., 91
nitidu (Vahl) Desf., 91
nivalis Ram', 91
nivicola Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 74
obtusifolia Thoday, 82
orientalis Willd., 91
paleacea Wikstr., 66
paludosa Thoday, 84
passerina Huth., 91
pectinata Lodd., 85
pendula Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Thoday, 11
pendula Eckl. & Zeyh. fide Drege, 77
pentandra Thunb., 61,91
persica Boiss., 91
pilosa G. Forst., 9 1
pilosu L.f., 91
planifolia Burm.f., 91
polycephala E.Mey ex Meisn., 91
polygalaefolia Lapeyr., 91
prostrata G. Forst., 91
prostrata L.f., 91
pube.scens Guss., 91
pubescens (L.) Loscos var. virgata Pau, 91
pube.scens (L.) Wikstr., 91
purpurea Wikstr., 91
quadrifaria Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 68
racemosa Wikstr., 91
rigida Wikstr., 73
var. comosa Meisn., 77
var. tetragona Meisn., 69
var. truncata Meisn., 63
rosmarinifoliae fide Meisn., 91
rubra C.H. Wright, 87
ruizii (Loscos.) Font-Quer, 91
salina Munby, 91
salsa Hunley, 91
salsolaefolia Poir., 91
sanamimda (All.) Bub., 91
segobriensis Pau, 91
sericea L., 91
setosa Thunb., 91
spicata L.f., 91
stachyoides Schrenk, 91
stellera Ram. ex Lam. & DC., 91
stelleri Wikstr., 91
striata Poir., 9 1
stricta Thunb., 91
subspicata Meisn., 91
tartonraira Schrad., 91
tenuiflora Willd., 91
tetragona Burch., 70
tetragona Steud., 91
thesioides Wikstr., 91
thomasii Duby, 91
thunbergii Wikstr., 91
thymelaea (Lam.) DC., 91
tinctoria Pourr., 91
var. angustifolia Boiss., 9 1
tingitana Salzm. ex Meisn., 91
tomentosa Wikstr., 92
truncata (Meisn.) Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 68
subsp. truncata, 68
subsp. monticola Bredenk. & A.E.van Wyk, 68
uniflora Drege ex Meisn., 92
uniflora L., 92
var. alba P.J.Bergius, 92
var. angustifolia Burm.f., 92
var. latifolia Burm.f., 92
var. purpurea P.J.Bergius, 92
velutina Boiss., 92
velutina [Pourr.] Cambess., 92
vesiculosa Fisch. & C.A.Mey., 92
villosa Thunb., 92
villosa Wikstr., 92
virescens Coss. & Dur. ex Meisn., 92
virgata Desf., 92
vulgaris (Meisn.) Thoday, 81
Passerine Lam. & DC., 61
Sanamimda Adans., 61
Steiroctis Raf., 61
Stellera passerina L., 89, 90, 91
Thymelaea Adans., 61
arvensis Lam., 89, 91
var. pubescens (Guss.) Meisn., 91
canescens (Schousb.) Endh, 89, 90
elliptica (Boiss.) Endh, 90
nitida Endh, 91
nivalis (Ram.) Meisn., 90
orientcdis Meisn., 91
tartonraira All. var. calvescens Gren. & Godr., 89, 91
thesioides (Lam.) Endh, 91
Trimeiandra Raf., 61
Bothalia 33,1: 99-104 (2003)
Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern
Africa. 5. Riccardia amazonica
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aneuraceae, Riccardia amazonica (Spruce) Schiffn. ex Gradst., South America, southern Africa, tropical Africa
ABSTRACT
Riccardia amazonica (Spruce) Schiffn. ex Gradst. is described and illustrated, as fresh material from southern Africa
has recently come to hand. Several tropical African species of the genus had previously been placed in synonymy with this
South American species; their type specimens have now also been studied.
INTRODUCTION
Aneura amazonica was first described by Spruce
(1885) from specimens collected in the Amazon at San
Carlos and San Gabriel, on the banks of the Negro River,
where it grew on fallen, half-rotten tree trunks. Jones
(1956) remarked on the similarity ‘between Riccardia
stephanii and some of the South American plants which
Stephani determined as A. amazonica Spruce, though the
resemblance to Spruce’s type gathering is less close’.
Jones made some new combinations but mostly treated
the generic names, Aneura and Riccardia as synonyms.
He proceeded to place Aneura stephanii Besch. ex
Steph., **A. congoensis Steph., ‘A. angusticostata’ Steph.,
A. grosselimbata Steph. and A. travisiana Pearson in
synonymy under R. stephanii Besch. ex Steph. Previous-
ly, Amell (1952) had described R. campanuliflora as a
new species from South Africa and had illustrated it.
Subsequently, Amell (1963) accepted Jones’s synonyms
of R. stephanii and added R. campanuliflora to this list,
using his earlier drawing of R. campanuliflora to illus-
trate his description of R. stephanii. Vanden Berghen
(1972), however, observed that the description of R.
stephanii by Amell (1963) and the drawings which
accompany it, correspond manifestly with a different
taxon from that circumscribed by Jones (1956), who had
examined the type of Aneura stephanii, collected in
‘Congo-Brazzaville’. I agree with Vanden Berghen and,
after re-examining the type collection, have not here
included R. campanuliflora as a synonym of R. amazon-
ica, although I have done so elsewhere (Perold in prep.).
Compared to R. amazonica, it is a rather more robust
plant.
According to Jones (1956) there are puzzling inter-
mediate forms and mixtures ‘which make it very difficult
to decide whether R. limbata, R. erosa and R. stephanii
represent distinct genotypes.’ Furthermore, he regarded
R. erosa as closely resembling R. stephanii and added
that ‘there is no doubt, however, that plants correspond-
ing to these three species do occur in pure patches,’ and
he formed the impression that in the field they were
specifically distinct.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria
MS. received: 2002-12-11.
** Should be R. congoana (Jones 1980).
In 1983 Jones & Harrington placed R. stephanii in
synonymy under R. angusticosta [or "angusticostata’’
(Steph.) Grolle (1973)], when they reported its presence
from Sierra Leone and Ghana. They concluded that R.
angusticosta, R. erosa and R. limbata were at most, varie-
ties of a single species, with much ill-defined intraspe-
cific variation.
After examining a large number of specimens, main-
ly from Kenya and Tanzania, Meenks & Poes (1985)
concluded that R. stephanii was synonymous with R.
amazonica Spruce. They also quoted 13 literature records,
showing it to be a widely distributed species.
Gradstein & Hekking (1979) reported R. amazonica
from Magdalena, San Sebastian, Colombia, at an altitude
of 2 600 m, whereas Gradstein et al. (2001) reported it
from lowland rainforest, so it has a wide altitudinal am-
plitude, as was also noted by Meenks & Poes (1985).
A fresh, fruiting specimen of R. amazonica was re-
cently collected in the neighbourhood of Buffelskloof
Nature Reserve, near Lydenburg. Some of it has been
cultivated to observe the oil bodies, the branching and
other characters, while the rest had been allowed to dry,
to serve as a herbarium specimen.
Riccardia amazonica (Spruce) Schiffn. ex Gradst. in
Gradst. & Hekking, Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 45: 129 (1979); Meenks & Poes: 83 (1985).
Type: Brazil, San Carlos del Rio Negro, ‘in trunco putri-
do’. Spruce s.n. (‘H16’) (MANCH cc [= computer cata-
logue no.] 1680, lecto.!).
Aneura amazonica Spruce: 545 (1885); Steph.: 734 (1901-1905).
A. stephanii Besch. ex Steph.: 735 (1901-1905). Type: Congo, Brazza-
ville, Thollon (G!).
A. angusticosta Steph.: 724 (1913). R. angusticostata (Steph.) Grolle:
550 (1973). R. angusticosta (Steph.) Grolle as corrected in Geissler &
Bischler (eds): 47 (1990). Type: Usambara, Brunnthaler (G!).
A. congoana Steph.: 23 (1917-1924). Type: Congo Beige, Bolombo,
Laurent (G!).
A. grosselimbata Steph.: 29 (1917-1924). Type: Ost Usambara, Amani,
Engle r (G!).
A. travisiana Pearson: 1 (1921). Type: French Cameroons, Duala, Travis
(MANCH).
1 mm
100
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
FIGURE 1, — Riccardia amazonica, Koekemoer 2217. A, field-grown male ihallus with axis and lateral branches, as well as several antheridial branch-
es; B. .segment of axis enlarged to show margins; C, primary branch with translucent margins; D, median dorsal epidermal cells (solid lines) of
ultimate .segment of axis with oil bodies, these also pre.sent in large subdorsal cells (stippled lines); E, marginal cells of ultimate pinnule, some
with oil bodies; E, G, c/s main axis at ± middle of ultimate segment; H, c/s axis upper portion; I, c/s axis lower portion; J, c/s primary branch;
K, gemma. L, M, antheridial branch: L, from above; M, c/s. N, part of cultured female thallus with calyptra; O, gynoecial branch with para-
physes from side. P, Q, calyptra: Pi, corona; P2, capsule; Pj, seta; Q, c/s calyptra wall. S, spores; T, elater. R, c/s part of bistratose wall of cap-
sule valve showing different cell walls; abr, abaxial radial; adr, adaxial radial; it, inner tangential; mw, median; ot. outer tangential.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
101
R. Stephana (Besch. ex Steph.) E.W.Jones: 81 (1956), hom. illeg,
Wigginton & Grolle: 205 ( 1996).
Thalli rather small, prostrate, creeping, in 2 or 3 loosely
to quite densely overlying layers fonning intricate mats,
bottom layer in patches or strips firmly adherent to sub-
strate, bright green when fresh, margins turning translucent
as chloroplasts disappear; when dry, duller green. Main
axis (Figure lA) up to 13 or 14 mm long, generally retain-
ing its dominance, width, particularly in male plants
(Figure IB), not uniform, 500-800 pm wide, alternately
widening before branching and narrowing again after-
wards, segments wedge-shaped, dorsally plane, branching
pinnate or occasionally bipinnate, not always equally well
developed on both sides, sometimes distally trifurcate or
subpalmate, occasionally with lateral incipient branches,
apically shallowly notched medianly, adjacent cells meris-
tematic, margins winged; ultimate segment often linear,
575-875 X 285-500 pm. Primary branches lateral, oppo-
site or subopposite, 350-650 pm between pinnae, spread-
ing obliquely at angles of less than 45° with axis, up to
1800 pm long, 375-525 pm wide (Figure 1C), secondary
branches/pinnules quite rare, rather weak and occasionally
just lateral swellings on primary branches, 375-500 x
275-375 pm. Stolons sometimes developing laterally from
main axis or from base of primary branches, up to 1375 x
100-140 pm. Dorsal epidennal cells in median part of api-
cal segment of main axis 5-7-sided (Figure ID), thin-
walled, 40.0-67.5 X 25.0-37.5 pm, subdorsal cells larger,
4—6-sided, 92.5- 135.0 x 30.0-37.5 pm, ventral epidermal
cells 42.5-65.0 x 25-35 pm. Oil bodies present in most
dorsal and ventral epidermal cells, 10-14 x 7.5-10.0 pm,
and in internal cells, where larger, 12.5-22.5 x 12-15 pm,
also in ± 20% of marginal cells, but more common in intra-
marginal cells, 1 or 2 per cell, and if 2, one smaller than the
other, lying close together, subspherical, ellipsoid or ovoid,
ends rounded or acute, light brown, finely granular.
Margins of ultimate pinnules (Figure IE) entire to slightly
crenulate, outer cells smaller than intramarginal ones, sub-
quadrate to rectangular, 22.5-40.0 x 17.5-35.0 pm, intra-
marginal cells 4—6-sided, 37.5-55.0 x 27.5-32.5 pm, most-
ly parallel to margin, not in diverging rows. Cross sections
of main axis: at ± middle of ultimate segment (Figure IF,
G) plano-convex, ± 300 pm wide, 60-90 pm or 3 cell rows
thick medianly, tapering laterally to unistratose margins, ±
90 pm or 3 cells wide, dorsal epidermal cells ± rectangular,
15-20 pm thick, internal cells few, ± 25 pm thick, ventral
cells 10-20 pm thick; at upper portion (Figure IH) plano-
convex, ± 500 pm wide, ± 90 pm or 4 cell rows thick medi-
anly, tapering to unistratose margins, ± 45 pm or 2 cells
wide; at lower portion (Figure 1 1) slightly concavo-convex,
± 520 pm wide, ± 60 pm or 3 cell rows thick medianly,
tapering to unistratose margins, 2 or 3 cells or up to 105 pm
wide; primary branch (Figure IJ) ± 60 pm or 3 cell rows
thick medianly, unistratose margins 2 or 3 cells wide.
Mucilage papillae ventral, clustered at shallow apical
notch of branches, 27.5^5.0 x 10-15 pm above, lower
down ± 7.5 pm wide, thicker-walled above, club-shaped,
soon becoming spaced in 2 acropetal rows, one on either
side of midline, not persistent. Rhizoids ventral on axes,
sometimes in submarginal strips, elsewhere in patches,
7.5-12.5 pm wide, occasionally the tips several times
branched. Asexual reproduction by gemmae (Figure IK)
observed in cultured plants, on dorsal surface of upper
branches, each of the 2 cells 22.5-25.0 x 30 pm, joined
together at their flat basal wall, the outer walls semi-circu-
lar.
Dioicous. Male plants up to 8.5 mm long. Antheridial
branches (Figure 1 A) along main axes obliquely lateral, oppo-
site or subopposite one another, or opposite a primary branch,
otherwise without an opposite pinna, rarely 2 male branches
close together, nearly adjoining basally, occasionally male
branch near base of primary pinna, oblong-linear, 300-750
pm long, mostly stipitate, up to 275 pm wide, bearing 4 or 5(6)
pairs of antheridia, cavities ± 60 x 85 pm, sepai'ated by single
row of cells, 45-50 x 40-50 pm (Figure IL), sometimes basal-
ly winged on one or both sides, wing up to 3 cell rows wide,
below merging with axis wing, branch in cross section (Figure
IM) ± 190 pm high, marginal cells erect, enlarged, from side
(50-)60-70 X 30-40 pm. Gynoecial branches (Figure IN) soli-
tary, arising laterally along axis, subopposite primary branch
or without opposite branching close by, otherwise below pri-
mary branch, near base of axis, youngest branches rounded,
190-250 X 250-260 pm, including paraphyses (Figure 10),
unfertihzed branches elongating up to 400 pm and with up to
6 pairs of archegonia, paraphyses along both mai'gins, some
with single strands of cells, 37.5-50.0 x 25-30 pm, joined
together end to end, others with 2-5 rows of laterally fused
cells, 52-125 pm wide, ± arching over archegonia. Calyptra
(Figure IP) clavate, at maturity 1875-2250 x 425-500 pm
above, slightly narrowing below, cross section of wall (Figure
IQ) up to 130 pm or 4 cell layers thick, outermost row with
scattered, single-celled papillae, extending upwai'ds to apex,
where grouped together to form a corona (Figure 1P|), cells
82.5-125.0 X 32.5-40.0 pm. Seta (Figure IP3) up to 11.5 x
130-150 pm, with 4 inner and 12 outer cell rows, i.e. 4 cells
diam. Capsule (Figure IP2) ± eUipsoidal, valves 640-730 x
200-350 pm or 16-19 cells wide, bistratose; cells of epider-
mal layer in external longitudinal view (Figure 2A) 55.0-
1 12.5 X 10-20 pm, end walls straight or oblique, with vertical
(radial) thickenings, evident as nodular brown bulges along
radial walls; inner cells (Figure 2B) 85.0-162.5 x 10-15 pm,
without nodular thickenings, but those on epidermal wall still
visible through thin wall; in cross section (Figure IR) cells in
epidemial layer ± 10 pm thick, thickenings on adaxial radial
and abaxial radial walls extending slightly onto outer and inner
tangential walls, bands on 2 sides of median wall alternating
with each other in a mirror image; inner cells ± 5 pm thick,
with faint, ill-defined bands. (Figure IS) 12.5-16.0 pm
diam., globose, exine layer ± smooth. Elaters (Figure IT)
200-275 X 10 pm, with spiral band ± 10 pm wide, tapering to
unspiralled apices.
DISCUSSION
The above description and illustration are based on a
recent collection in Mpumalanga by M. Koekemoer. The
plants grew on a fallen tree trunk lying across a stream at
an altitude of 1 479 m. R. amazonica was also recorded
from Lesotho by Hodgetts et al. (1999) at Bokong head-
waters, Leribe Dist., altitude 3 000 m and was once col-
lected at Hogsback, Eastern Cape (as R. stephanii) by
Shaun Russell (Figure 3). It is surely more widespread in
southern Africa, but I think one ought to disregard
Amell’s (1963) reports of it from Western Cape (under R.
stephanii and R. campanuliflora). It is not, however,
intended to rule out entirely its possible presence in
Western Cape.
102
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
FIGURE 2. — Riccardia amazonica,
Koekemoer 2217. A, cells of
epidermal layer of wall of
valve in external longitudinal
view, X 389; B, cells of inner
layer of wall of valve in
internal longitudinal view, x
389; C, dark stained infesta-
tion at apices of primary and
secondary branches, x 194.
According to Meenks & Poes (1985), R. amazonica is
widespread in tropical Africa also in tropical South Ame-
rica (Meenks 1987).
Except for Spruce’s (1885) original description of/?.
amazonica, there akso are Stephani’s (1901-1905), as
well as one (not seen) in a manuscript by Meenks (Van
Zanten & Gradstein 1988). Otherwise, all I could find are
the short descriptions of its later synonyms by Stephani
( 1913, 1917-1924), as well as Jones’s ( 1956) and Vanden
Berghen’s (1972) of /?. stephanii. Meenks & Poes ( 1985)
give some notes on R. amazonica. Illustrations are also
few, namely, Jones’s (1956) drawings of/?, .stephanii, as
well as Vanden Berghen’s (1972), Stephani’s leones
(1985) and recently. Figure 67G-I of /?. amazonica in
Gradstein et al. (2001 ).
In a comparison of the type specimens of /?. amazon-
ica, R. angusticosta, R. congoana, R. grosselimhata and
/?. stephanii with the Koekemoer collection, the latter
appears to be closest to R. stephanii, even sharing some
kind of dark stained infestation (Figure 2C) in several of
the apices of the ultimate segments of the main axes and
quite a few of the primary branches in field-grown mate-
rial. The male branches of /?. stephanii are, however,
considerably longer with up to 14 pairs of antheridia and
conspicuous marginal cells. For the most part, the type
specimens of the above synonyms are tiny plants, all
Bothalia33,l (2003)
103
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Riccardia amazonica in southern Africa.
growing on decaying wood. However, I have to agree
with Jones (1956) that the resemblance between R.
Stephana and Spruce’s type gathering (of R. amazonica)
‘is less close’.
In his study on polyploidy in some West African
species of Riccardia, Berrie (1966) remarked that there
were at least two races within a population of R.
stephanii: one dioicous race with a chromosome number
of 10 (diploid), the other monoicous with n = 20
(tetraploid). There was also some indirect evidence of a
third race with n = 40. With such diversity in the chro-
mosome numbers of R. stephanii one could expect to
find morphological diversity as well.
The Koekemoer collection is clearly dioicous. On the
other hand, Meenks & Poes (1985) found that the collec-
tions they studied from East Africa ‘all proved to be
monoicous’, whereas the South American specimens
were apparently dioicous. Jones (1956) described R.
stephanii as ‘monoicous, but often apparently dioicous’,
concluding on p. 81, ‘it is not easy to demonstrate the
monoicousness’, though referring here to other species.
Spruce (1885) described the calyptra of R. amazonica as
encircled below by broadly cuneate-crenate external
bracts, which alternate with shorter inner bracts. Only
one row of paraphyses around the base of the calyptra
was observed in the present study. Meenks & Poes
(1985) state that R. amazonica can be distinguished from
related taxa ‘by the absence of a wing along the main
axis (occasionally a 1 or 2 cells wide wing is present near
the branching points)’. According to Spruce (1885) the
‘stem’ is winged between the pinnae and cuneately
widened. Serial cross sections of the main axis of R.
amazonica that I cut, show a 2-cell wide wing on either
side, particularly in male plants.
Jones (1956) described the oil bodies of R. stephanii
as ‘1 or 2 per cell, spherical or oval, 10-12 x 10-15 pm,
compound, of well-defined droplets c. 2 pm diam.’ Kis
& Poes (1997) report the oil bodies in R. amazonica as
‘K-2) per cell, 3-9 x 18^0 pm’, and illustrate 2 togeth-
er in one cell and another one in part of an adjoining cell;
2 are ovoid and 1 is vermiform, the latter quite unlike
those in Jones’s description of R. stephanii ’s oil bodies as
well as my own findings. Stephani (1901-1905) placed
Aneura amazonica, A. stephanii, A. tenuicostata Schiffn.
and A. vitiensis Steph. together in the group ‘Plantae par-
vae vel exiguae’.
R. amazonica specimens are distinguished by the fol-
lowing characters: 1, small, rather delicate, prostrate
thalli, in 2 or 3 overlying layers; 2, branching on one side
of main axis often poorly developed; 3, dioicous, with
male thalli often somewhat smaller; 4, main axis with a
2-cell wide wing on either side, particularly noticeable in
male thalli; 5, pinnae with unistratose wings, 2 or 3 cells
wide, marginal cells entire to slightly crenulate; and 6,
calyptra wall with papillae forming a corona at the top.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Koekemoer 2217, Mpumalanga, Lisabon Plantation bordering
Buffelskloof Nature Reserve, Lisabon/Uitkyk concrete weir, on fallen
tree trunk lying over stream, alt. 1 479 m (PRE).
Shaun Russell CHI2618, N'tosana Eorest, Hogsback (PRE).
Spruce MANCH ccl679. ccl687.
Also type specimens of the synonyms held at G, as listed under
Riccardia amazonica (Spruce) Schiffn. ex Gradst.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The curators of G and MANCH are thanked for the loan
of specimens. I also express my sincere gratitude to Dr M.
Koekemoer, curator of PRE, for kindly collecting the speci-
men of R. amazonica', to Mr M. Wigginton, Peterborough,
for obtaining and sending me a copy of Pearson’s article
and to the referees for their helpful suggestions and advice.
The artist, Ms G. Condy and the typist, Ms D. Maree are
thanked for their valued contributions.
REEERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1952. South African species of Riccardia. Botaniska
Notiser 1952; 138-156.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Science
Council, Stockholm.
BERRIE, G.K. 1966. Polyploidy in some West African species of Ric-
cardia (Gray). Revue hiyologique et lichenoiogique 34: 302-
308.
GEISSLER. P. & BISCHLER, H. (eds). 1990. Index Hepaticurum 12: 47.
GRADSTEIN, S.R. & HEKKING, W.H.A. 1979. Studies on Colom-
hian Cryptogams IV. A catalogue of the Hepaticae of Colombia.
Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 45: 93-144.
GRADSTEIN. S.R., CHURCHILL. S.R & SALAZAR-ALLEN, N. 2001.
Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of The
New York Botanical Garden 86: 203.
GROLLE, R. 1973. Miscellanea hepaticologica 121-130. Journal of the
Hattori Botanical Laboratory 36: 547-55 1 .
HODGETTS, N.G.. MATCHAM, H.W. & DUCKETT, J.G. 1999. Bryo-
phytes collected in Lesotho, the Natal Drakensberg and the Orange
Free State, southern Africa. Jounial of Bryology 21 : 13.3-155.
JONES. E.W. 1956. African Hepatics XL The genus Riccardia in trop-
ical Africa. Transactions of the British Btyological Society 3:
74-84.
JONES, E.W. 1980. African Hepatics XXXII. Journal of Bryology 11:
311-323.
JONES. E.W. & HARRINGTON. A.J. 1983. The hepatics of Sierra
Leone and Ghana. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural
History), Botany 11: 215-289.
KIS. G. & POCS, T. 1997. Oil body studies on African hepaticae.
Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 81: 175-242.
MEENKS, J.L.D. 1987. Studies on Colombian Cryptogams XXVIII: a
guide to the tropical Andean species of Riccardia (Hepaticae).
Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratoiy 62: 161-182.
104
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
MEENKS. J.L.D. & POCS, T. 1985. East African hryophytes IX. Aneu-
raceae. Abstracta Botanica 9: 79-98.
PEARSON, W.H. 1921. 1. Notes on a collection of Hepatics from the
Cameroons. West Coast of Africa. Memoirs of the Proceedings
of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 65. 1 : 1.2.
PEROLD, S.M. in prep. Aneuraceae. Strelitzia.
SPRUCE, R. 1885. Hepaticae amazonicae et andinae. Transactions and
Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 15: 545,
546.
STEPHANI. F. 1901-1905. Species hepaticarum II: 734. 735.
STEPHANI, F. 1913. In J. Brunnthaler, Ergebnisse einer botanischen
Forschungsreise nach Deutsch-Ost Afrika und Slid-Afrika (Kapland,
Natal und Rhodesia). Teil 1. p.l4. Denkschriften der kaiserlichen
Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Natunvissenschaft-
lichen Klasse 88: 724.
STEPHANI, F. 1917-1924. Species hepaticarum VI: 23, 29.
STEPHANI, F. 1985. leones hepaticarum. Microfiche, Inter Documenta-
tion Company bv. Leiden.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. Residtats
scientifiques de V exploration hydrobiologique du Basin Lac
Bangweolo & Luapitla 8: 724.
VAN ZANTEN, B.O. & GRADSTEIN, S.R. 1988. Experimental dispersal
geography of Neotropical liverworts. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia
90: 70.
WIGGINTON, M.J. & GROLLE, R. Supplemented by GYARMATl, A.
1996. Catalogue of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Sub-
Saharan Africa. Bryophytoriim Bibliotheca 50: 202, 203. Berlin,
Stuttgart.
Bothalia33,l: 105-120(2003)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
APOCYNACEAE
A NEW SUBSPECIES OE BRACHYSTELMA FROM EASTERN CAPE. SOUTH AFRICA (ASCLEPIADOIDEAE-CEROPEGIEAE)
Brachystelma franksiae N.E.Br. subsp. grandi-
florum A.P.Dold & Briiyns, subsp. nov., B. franksiae
N.E.Br. affinis sed corolla 8-11 mm longa et 10-15 mm
lata, flavo-virenti; lobulis exterioribus corollae erectis
non ad lateralibus effusis, dense hispidis differt.
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3327 (Peddle): Igoda Mouth.
(-BB), 50 m, 09-11-2000, Dolcl 4425 (GRA. holo.;
BOL).
Perennial, non-succulent, geophytic herb with spread-
ing, fleshy, fusiform roots. Stems 1 or 2, 300-500 mm
long, up to 2.5 mm thick at base, erect, sparsely
branched, obscurely square in cross section, with sparse,
retrorse. white hairs up to 0.4 mm long. Leaves ovate,
10-25 X 6-17 mm, papillate with occasional, minute,
white trichomes, lower midrib and margin scabrid,
spreading on setulose petiole 2-3 mm long. Inflores-
cences sessile, many per stem mainly in upper half, each
with 1 or 2 flowers, extra-axillary at nodes, with 1-3 linear-
lanceolate bracts, 1. 5-2.0 x up to 0.4 mm at base; pedi-
cels 8.0-10.5 mm long, up to 0.8 mm diam., spreading
and holding flower facing slightly downwards; sepals
lanceolate, 2. 0-2. 5 x 0.6-0. 9 mm at base, acute, green,
with small white bristles, spreading with recurved
apices. Corolla 8-11 x 10-15 mm, lobed almost to base;
outside pale green, inside pale yellow-green at base
almost immediately becoming darker green and chang-
ing to yellow towards apices of lobes; tube ± absent;
lobes oblong, 7-1 1 x 2. 2-2. 6 mm at maximum, broadest
at base, erect to somewhat spreading, folded along
midrib so that it is strongly keeled within, acute, margins
with clavate, swollen hairs, 0.4-0. 6 mm long. Gyno-
stegiiim up to 0.6 mm diam. at base, up to 0.4 mm high;
outer corona lobes ± 1.8 x up to 0.5 mm at base, bifid
almost to base, lobules white and sparsely speckled with
pink, spreading-erect, densely papillate with erect, white
papillae, ± 0.2 mm long; inner corona lobes linear,
2. 0-2. 4 X up to 0.5 mm towards base, adpressed to backs
of anthers, then connivent and erect forming a column in
centre over style-head, nearly twice as long as outer
lobes, white with minute, dense pink speckling towards
base, glabrous. Pollininm ellipsoidal and flattened, up to
0.3 X 0.2 mm, with insertion crest along outer edge, gold-
en brown; corpusculum oblong, up to 0.2 mm long,
brown, narrowly and transparently winged; caudicle short,
naiTow, brown. Flowering time: November to January.
Figures 1; 2; 3.
Brachystelma franksiae subsp. grandiflorum is distin-
guished from the typical subsp. franksiae (Dyer 1980,
1983) by its larger yellow-green flowers and the orienta-
tion of the outer corona lobes (Table 1 ). This new sub-
species is only known from Igoda Mouth, which lies ± 15
km southwest of East London (Figure 4). Here it was
found at 50 m above sea level on steep, sea-facing slopes
less than 200 m away from the sea, in coastal grassland
dominated by Themeda triandra. Plants are rare, solitary
and protrude just above the dense grasses, which reach a
height of ± 0.5 m. At this locality they receive daily mist
off the sea and this supplements the average annual rain-
fall of ± 500 mm which peaks in March and October
(Kopke 1988). Due to the small population size and
extremely small area occupied by the species we assign
the lUCN (2000) category. Vulnerable (VU D2) to this
subspecies. B. franksiae subsp. franksiae is found in
FIGURE 1. — Brachystelma franksiae. A. C. D. subsp. franksiae. Bruyns 4511: A, corolla with two lobes removed; C. base of corolla in vertical
section; D. pollinarium. B. E. subsp. grandiflorum. Bold 4425: B, corolla with two lobes removed; E. pollinarium. Scale bars: A, C. 1 mm
(at A); B. 1 mm; D. E. 0.25 mm (at A). Illustrations: RV. Bruyns.
106
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 2. — Bracliystelma franksiae subsp. grandiflorum. Dold 4425:
clavate hair with verrucose surface on margin of corolla lobe.
Stale bar: 100 pm.
FIGURE 3. — Bracliystelma franksiae subsp. grandiflorum, Dold 4425:
flower. Scale bar: 1 mm.
FIGURE 4. — Known distribution of Bracliystelma franksiae subsp.
grandiflorum. 0.
KwaZulu-Natal as far south as Port Shepstone, ± 300 km
north of Igoda Mouth.
Specimens examined
Subsp. franksiae
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2930 (Pietenuaiitzburg): Camperdown, (-DA),
Franks sub Wood 1172 1 (NH, holo.; PRE). 3030 (Port Shepstone):
Horseshoe, (-CA), Oribi, Bruyns 45 1 1 (BOL).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Rhodes University Joint Research Council is ac-
knowledged for their support of the first author. The
University of Cape Town Research Council provided
support for the second author.
TABLE 1 . — Morphological differences between Bracliystelma
franksiae subspecies
REFERENCES
DYER, R.A. 1980. Asclepiadaceae. Flora of southern Africa 27,4: 31.
DYER, R.A. 1983. Ceropegia, Brachystelma and Riocreuxia in south-
ern Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
KOPKE, D. 1988. The climate of the eastern Cape. In M.N. Bruton &
F.W. Gess, Towards an environmental plan for the eastern
Cape. Proceedings of a conference to review the environmental
problems of the Eastern Cape Province. Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
lUCN. 2000. lUCN Red List Categories, prepared by the Species Survi-
val Commission. lUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
A.P DOLD* and P.V. BRUYNS**
* Selmar Schonland Herbarium, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 101,
6 1 40 Grahamstown.
** Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, 7701 Ronde-
bosch.
MS. received : 2002-04-15.
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
107
LAMIACEAE
TETRADENIA KAOKOENSIS. ANEW SPECIES FROM KAOKOLAND, NAMIBIA
INTRODUCTION
Tetradenia kaokoensis was discovered while survey-
ing succulent cremnophytes in South Africa and Namibia
as part of a larger study of succulent plants associated
with cliff faces in southern Africa.
The genus Tetradenia is endemic to Africa (4 species)
and Madagascar (3 species). It was revised by Codd
(1983, 1984) in Bothalia; the southern African species
were treated in the Flora of southern Africa by Codd
(1985). All members of the genus are semisucculent,
drought-resistant, deciduous shrubs.
Tetradenia kaokoensis Van Jaarsv. & A.E.van
Wyk. sp. nov., a T. ripariae (Hochst.) Codd habitu humil-
iore parce ramoso, radicibus tuberosis, ramis juvenibus
albo-arachnoideis tomentosis, 12 mm diametro, phyl-
lopodiisque acutis munitis, aestate florenti differt.
TYPE. — Namibia, 1712 (Posto Velho): northern
Kaokoland, Otjihipa Mountains, near Koakora Spring,
sheer dolomite cliffs, (-BD), Van Jaarsveld, Cilliers &
Van WyT 16617 (WIND, holo.; NBG, PRE).
Robust, erect, semisucculent, slightly aromatic, decid-
uous, sparsely branched, dioecious shrub up to 0.6 m tall.
Roots succulent, up to 10 mm diam. Stem terete, 12-20
mm diam., succulent, brittle, grey-brown, sparsely longi-
tudinally fissured, with oblong-oval lenticels 5 mm long;
young branches densely white-cobwebby tomentose,
sparsely covered with orange gland dots, becoming
glabrescent and brown with age; bark peeling. Leaves
crowded, ovate or ovate-triangular, 65-140 x 45-115
mm, apex acute to rounded, base cordate, densely white-
cobwebby tomentose on lower surface with scattered
orange glands, less so on upper surface, veins prominent
below; margin crenate-dentate with up to 20 pairs of
teeth; petiole 20-45 mm long, with basal subpetiolar pur-
plish gland-like swellings and abscission layer (detach-
ment point of petiole); 2-4 mm of base of petiole persis-
tent forming a phyllopodium and slightly thicker than
petiole, densely white-cobwebby tomentose, adaxially
grooved, becoming woody after leaves have fallen; phyl-
lopodium scar cordate and concave, dorsal side sharp
and pointed. Inflorescence flowering when in leaf, of
dense lateral or terminal oblong to pyramidal panicles,
up to 200 X 120 mm; lateral branches 20-25 mm long;
rachis densely white-cobwebby tomentose and with
orange gland dots; bracts broadly triangular-ovate, 1.5 x
1.5 mm, translucent. Flowers dioecious, in 3-flowered
cymes forming 6-flowered verticillasters; pedicels ± 0.3
mm long. Calyx ±0.8 mm long, in female plants enlarg-
ing up to 1 .5 mm in fruit, cobwebby tomentose and cov-
ered with orange gland dots; five-toothed, appears 3-
lobed, upper lobe ovate, 0.5 mm long (becoming erect in
fruit), lateral lobes bifid, each lobe divided into two tri-
angular-lanceolate lobes 0.5-0. 7 mm long (female flow-
ers). Corolla 2-lipped, 5-lobed, up to 3 x mm diam.
when open, 3 mm long; tube funnel-shaped, white.
FIGURE 5. — Tetradenia kaokoensis in flower.
glabrous inside, tomentose outside; lower lip oblong-
oval, 1.5 X 0.7 mm; upper lobes ovate, 1 x 0.7 mm.
Stamens in male flowers exserted, up to 5.3 mm long,
much shorter in female flowers, translucent; anthers
white. Disc 2-lobed, bright red, lobes exceeding ovary.
Style ± 2.5 mm long; stigma bifid, purplish, ± 1 mm long
in male flowers. Nutlets of two types: normal type more
common, larger, 0.7 mm long, oblong-ovoid, brown;
smaller type 0.5 mm long, oblong, longitudinally ridged
with 4-7 dark brown ridges. Flowering time: November
to Eebruary. Eigures 5-7.
Tetradenia kaokoensis has several distinct vegetative
and floral features. Flowering occurs in summer, when
the plants are in leaf (Figure 5). It is a robust, short, up to
0.6 m tall, sparsely branched shrub, with succulent roots
and young branches of 12 mm in diameter (Figure 6).
Most parts have a dense white-cobwebby tomentum,
with distinct orange gland dots and no stipitate glandular
hairs. The young branches of T kaokoensis are unique
within the genus Tetradenia. The new species is covered
with pointed phyllopodia (Figure 7) resulting from per-
sistent petiole bases; the basal petiole scar is characteris-
tically heart-shaped.
FIGURE 6. — Tetradenia kaokoensis, showing the leaves.
108
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 7. — Tetradenia kaokoeusis, x 0.9, showing the characteristic
pointed phyllopodia. Artist: Jeanette Loedolff.
Tetradenia kaokoeusis closely resembles the wide-
spread and variable African species T riparia (Hochst.)
Codd. T. riparia is a highly aromatic, much-branched
shrub up to 3 m tall, without succulent roots. Further-
more, it has much thinner young branches, lacking the
characteristic crowded leaves and woody phyllopodia
found in T. kaokoeusis. The leaves are glandular pubes-
cent and lack the dense white-cobwebby indumentum
and orange sessile gland dots found in T. kaokoeusis. T.
riparia flowers in midwinter after its leaves have
dropped. The mature calyx of T. kaokoeusis is smaller,
only 1.5 mm long, compared to 2 mm in T. riparia. The
bright red ovary disc in T. kaokoeusis is bilobed, exceed-
ing the ovary. This is quite similar to the three
Madagascan species, T. fruticosa Benth., T. uerx’osa
Codd and T. goiidotii Briq., which also have a bilobed
disc exceeding the ovary. The ovary disc of T. nervosa is
purple. In all other African species, T. riparia, T. hre-
vispicata (N.E.Br.) Codd and T. barherae (N.E.Br.)
Codd, the disc is 1-lobed (colourless in T. riparia) and
occasionally 2-lobed in T. hrevispicata and the disc does
not exceed the ovary.
Tetradenia kaokoeirsis appears to be endemic to the
dolomite cliffs of the Otjihipa Mountains of northern
Kaokoland. It occurs on southern and northern slopes of
sheer precipices, growing in rock cracks. The larger
mountains of the region are generally known as the
Baynes Mountains. The Otjihipa Mountains just south of
the Kunene River are the western outlier of the Baynes
Mountains. The eastern portion, just over 2 000 m high,
consists of quartzitic sandstone, whereas the western
portion on the fringe of the Namib Desert consists of
dolomite. T. kaokoeusis is not common and is restricted
to the inaccessible cliff faces. The climate is subtropical,
warm in winter and hot in the summer months. Leaves
appear in late spring and last until the end of autumn,
also depending on the rainfall. Rainfall is ± 200 mm per
annum and the vegetation is arid savanna with species of
mopane and Commiphora, the most common woody
plants. Associated plants found with the new species
include Adenium hoehmianum. Aloe coralliua, Ceraria
lougipedunciilata, Plectrantlnis hereroeusis and Sesamo-
thamnus ‘leistneri’.
It is interesting to note the convergent features of T.
kaokoeusis with another African species of the family
Lamiaceae, Plectrauthiis crassiis from Mulanje Moun-
tain to the east, a granite massif more or less at the same
latitude, but closer to the Indian Ocean. P. crassiis has a
similar white-cobwebby indumentum and sessile orange
gland dots on its young stems and leaves and the young
stems have similar adaxially grooved, short, woody
phyllopardia. It is also a sparsely branched shrub up to 1
m tall, with tuberous roots and base, but this is where the
resemblance ends. Its floral features are typical of the
genus Plectrantlnis. P. crassiis occurs in grassland at an
altitude of about 3 000 m.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mr G. Germishuizen and Mrs E. du Plessis are
thanked for editing the text and Dr O.A. Leistner for
translating the diagnosis into Latin. Our thanks go to Dr
Gillian Maggs, Director of the National Herbarium in
Windhoek for allowing the first author to examine
Tetradenia specimens at the Herbarium in Namibia. Mr
Holger Kohlberg of the Ministry of Environment and
Tourism provided the necessary permits for collecting
and research.
REFERENCES
CODD, L.E. 1983. The genus Tetradenia Benth. (Lamiaceae) I. African
species. Bothalia 14: 177-183.
CODD, L.E. 1984. The genus Tetradenia Benth. (Lamiaceae) II.
Malagasy Republic. Bothalia 15: 1-6.
CODD, L.E. 1985. Lamiaceae: Tetradenia. Flora of southern Africa
28,4: 113-116.
E.J. VAN JAARSVELD* and A.E. VAN WYK**
* National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbo.sch. Private Bag X7, 7735
Claremont.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany, University
of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2001-09-04.
Bothalia33,l (2003)
109
HYACINTHACEAE
A NEW SPECIES AND NEW COMBINATIONS IN DRIMIA (URGINEOIDEAE)
The genera of Hyacinthaceae with spurred bracts, form
a natural, monophyletic group comprising the subfamily
Urgineoideae (Pfosser & Speta 1999). Relationships
between the species within the subfamily, however, are
less easy to discern and the generic delimitations have
consequently been more controversial (Stedje 2001).
While segregate genera such as Rhadamanthus Salisb..
Schizobasis Baker and Litanthiis Harv. have been recog-
nized by most modem workers, there has been much less
consensus regarding the generic circumscriptions that
have been applied to the bulk of the remaining species,
centring around the genera Driiuia Jacq. ex Willd. and
Urginea Steinh. A more conservative approach emphasiz-
ing the intermediate morphology of certain of the taxa
includes most of the species in the single genus Drimia
(Jessop 1977; Stedje 1987, 1996). A radical alternative
championed by Speta (1998a, b) and based mainly on
molecular evidence, recognizes numerous segregate gen-
era that are poorly defined on morphological grounds. A
re-assessment of the molecular evidence indicates that
this extreme splitting is unjustified (Manning et al. in
prep.) and we consequently favour a broad circumscrip-
tion of the genera in which we recognize only Bowiea and
Drimia (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). When regarded as a
single large genus, Drimia is well defined by the apo-
morphic, short-lived flowers with the tepals ± united at
the base. Each flower lasts a single day or less and the
perianth is caducous, abscising at the base to wither as a
cap on the developing capsule. Drimia in this broad sense
constitutes a sister clade to Bowiea, the remaining genus
in the subfamily (Pfosser & Speta 1999), which has ple-
siomorphic, long-lived flowers lasting for several days,
with free tepals and a persistent perianth that remains
attached to the base of the developing fruit. Bowiea is
defined by its twining, much-branched and somewhat
fleshy inflorescence.
Most of the necessary combinations reflecting this
interpretation of the genera have already been made for
both the tropical African species (Stedje 1987, 1996) and
those from the Cape flora (Goldblatt & Manning 2000).
Some species from the summer rainfall region have not
yet been transferred to Drimia, however, and this is done
here. At the same time we take the opportunity of cor-
recting the synonomy of one species and of describing a
new species, Drimia barkerae. This taxon was included
in the account of the family Hyacinthaceae in Cape
plants (Goldblatt & Manning 2000) as Drimia sp. 1 and
was known at the time from a single herbarium collec-
tion. The recent discovery of a flowering population in
the wild enables us to describe and name it.
Drimia barkerae Oberm. ex J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt, sp. nov.
TYPE. — Western Cape; 3218 (Clanwilliam), 5 km
south west of Eendekuil, Earm Draaihoek, (-DD), open
clay flats, 13 Oct. 2001, Manning 2655A (NBG, holo.;
PRE, iso.).
Geophytum deciduum, foliis 3-5(-8), hysteranthis
effusis ellipticis ad oblanceolatis infra strigosis, 20-25 x
3-6 mm; scapo flexuoso, 80-160 mm longo, minute
pubescente dimidio inferiore, racemo corymboso, dense,
10-20-floro; bracteis caducis ± 1 mm longis, inferioribus
calcari, 0. 5-2.0 mm longo; pedicellis suberectis, 6-8 mm
longis; floribus campanulatis, tepalis 4.0-4. 5 mm longis,
basin versus in tubum cupulatum ± 1.5 mm longum con-
natis; staminibus erectis, per ± 1 mm ad perianthum
adnatis, filamentis erectis, subteretibus, supra decrescen-
tibus, 1.5 mm longis, antheris dorsifixis, 0.75 mm longis;
ovario ovoideo, ad 1.8 mm longo, stylo ad 1 mm longo.
Deciduous, bulbous herb. Bulb solitary, subglobose,
10-15 mm diam.; outer coat pale brown, papery; inner
tunics tightly overlapping, white. Leaves dry and with-
ered at flowering, (3-)5-7(-9), spreading and prostrate
to suberect, leathery; base narrowed and amplexicaul;
blade narrowly oblanceolate to obovate, (15-)20-30
(-70) X (3-)5-7(-9) mm, concave, usually glabrous
adaxially but sometimes with scattered hairs, sparsely
hairy abaxially with soft, somewhat deflexed hairs or
rarely only minutely hairy, bright green. Inflorescence
erect, scape flexuose, 80-160 mm long, minutely pubes-
cent in lower half but glabrescent above, hairs arranged
in vertical rows; raceme corymbose, 5-10 mm long,
densely 10-20-flowered; bracts caducous, ± 1 mm long,
lower spurred, spur 0. 5-2.0 mm long; pedicels suberect,
6-8 mm long at anthesis. Flowers suberect, shallowly
campanulate, 1 or 2 open at a time, pale brownish with
darker keels, opening in the late morning and fading in
the evening, vanilla-scented; tepals biseriate with blades
of outer series overlapping inner, penicillate at apex,
4. 0-4. 5 mm long, fused for ± 1 .5 mm in cup-shaped tube,
blades of outer tepals broadly ovate, ± 3.5 x 2 mm, inner
ovate, ± 2.5 x 1.5 mm. Stamens adnate to perianth for ±
1 mm; filaments erect, subterete and tapering, ± 1.5 mm
long; anthers erect, dorsifixed, introrse, dehiscing by lon-
gitudinal slits, ± 0.75 mm long, greenish yellow with yel-
low pollen. Ovary ovoid, truncate, green, ± 1.8 mm long;
style columnar, ± 1 mm long, white, apically truncate
with trigonous, papillate stigma. Capsule ovoid to sub-
globose, ± 5 X 4.5 mm, erect on suberect, lightly curved
pedicels. Seeds compressed, rectangular, ± 2 mm diam.,
shiny black, irregularly folded, finely reticulate.
Flowering time: October and November. Eigure 8.
Distribution and biology. Drimia barkerae appears to
be restricted to isolated open patches on the flats that sur-
round the Piketberg in Western Cape (Figure 9). To the
south and east of the Piketberg the clay substrate was
originally covered by West Coast Renosterveld, now
almost completely under cultivation for wheat, while to
the north and west the soils are sandy and support Sand
Plain Fynbos (Low & Rebelo 1996). Scattered through-
out the area, however, are isolated open patches, often
associated with wash lines. These patches support a
sparse vegetation dominated by various succulent plants.
The underlying soils in these patches are fine mudstones
overlain by quartzite pebble fields and are apparently
110
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 8. — Drimia barkeme. A, whole plant at flowering, with with-
ered leaves; B, leaf rosettes when green; C, lower bract; D,
flower. E, F, stamens: E, side view, F, front view. G, ovary; H,
capsule; I, seed. Scale bar: A, B, H, I, 10 mm; C-G, 1 mm.
Artist: John Manning.
somewhat saline as these distinctive patches are known
locally as ‘brakveld’. The vegetation of these patches is
dominated by the halophytes Sarcocornia xerophila
(Amaranthaceae) and Limonium equisetinum (Plum-
baginaceae) and the asteraceous shrub Pteronia uncina-
ta, associated with various succulent genera, including
Antimima and Drosanthemum (both Aizoaceae) and
Adromischus (Crassulaceae). These open patches form
islands of succulent vegetation within the renosterveld
and constitute a highly distinctive habitat that supports
several rare, highly local endemic species known only
from the flats around Piketberg. These include Diplo-
soma retroversmn (Aizoaceae) and Drosanthemum zygo-
phylloides (Aizoaceae), and now apparently also Drimia
barkerae. Investigation of several of these patches indi-
cates that Drimia barkerae is likely to occur in many of
them. The species favours shallow, loamy soils fringing
the fine clays and quartzite pebble fields and is often
quite common around these open patches. It flowers in
late spring, in October and November, at which time the
leaves are withered and brown. The flowers, like all
species of Drimia, are fugacious, opening in the late
morning and fading by the following morning. One or at
most two flowers are open on any given day although it
is not uncommon for none to open. They are faintly
vanilla-scented and secrete minute quantities of nectar
from septal nectaries that open near the top of the ovary.
Red Data status: Critically Endangered (CR B1 -i-
2abcd).
History, the species was first collected in late October
1943 by the Cape Town botanist, W.F. Barker, who had a
great interest in the systematics of the Hyacinthaceae,
particularly the genus Lachenalia. She was clearly
intrigued by the species since she went to the trouble of
growing it for two years in order to collect fruits and
leaves. The species appears to have been overlooked by
Jessop (1977) in his revision of the Drimia alliance but
was later noticed by the Pretoria botanist, Amelia
Obermeyer, who recognized that it was new and intend-
ed to name it after Barker. D. barkerae remained uncol-
lected for almost sixty years until we located a small
flowering colony west of Piketberg in the late spring of
2001, when we collected material for description and
illustration. On a subsequent trip to collect leafing mate-
rial in July 2002 we investigated other likely spots and
have now collected D. barkerae from several localities in
the vicinity, between the foot of Piekenierskloof Pass and
Redelinghuys.
Diagnosis and relationships: the relationships of D.
barkerae clearly lie with the small group of Cape species
that includes D. marginata (Thunb.) Jessop, D. minor
(A.V.Duthie) Jessop and D. virens (Schltr.) J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt. These three species all produce an elongate
scape bearing a congested, corymbose inflorescence of
small, campanulate, brownish flowers. They are distin-
guished from one another by differences in their leaves,
as detailed in Goldblatt & Manning (2000). D. barkerae
is unique in the group in producing a tuft of oblanceolate
to obovate leaves that are more or less conspicuously
hairy beneath.
Bothalia33,l (2003)
Additional material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg Dist.. 10 km
southwest of Redelinghuys, loam on fringe of quartzite patch, 1-7-
2002, (-DA), Manning 2745 (NBG); western foot of Piekenierskloof
Pass, loamy soil on fringe of quartzite patch, 1-7-2002, Manning 2746
(NBG); Sauer, on bank by roadside, 28-10-1943, (-DC), Barker
NBG409/43 (NBG).
The combination Drimia ciliata (L.f.) Baker was list-
ed in Goldblatt & Manning 2000 in error. This species
was never treated in Drimia by Baker and the correct
combination is made below.
Drimia ciliata (L.f.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt,
comb. nov.
Ornithogalum ciliatum L.f., Supplementarum plantarum: 199
(1782). Urginea ciliata (L.f.) Baker: 218 (1873). Type: South Africa,
Caput bonae Spei, Thunberg s.n. {UPS-THUNB8281 , holo.!).
Drimia kniphofioides (Baker) J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt, comb. nov.
Urginea kniphofioides Baker in Flora capensis 6: 469 (1897). Type:
South Africa, eastern Transvaal [Mpumalanga], Havelock Concession.
Saltmarshe sub Galpin 1055 (K. holo.; BOL!).
Drimia nana (Snijman) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt,
comb. nov.
Tenicroa nana Snijman in South African Journal of Botany 51: 284
(1985). Type: South Africa, Kamiesberg, 26-11-1980, Snijman 292
(NBG. holo.!; PRE. K).
Drimia saniensis (Hilliard & B.L.Burtt) J.C. Man-
ning & Goldblatt, comb. nov.
Urginea saniensis Hilliard & B.L.Burtt in Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 42: 253 (1985). Type: Lesotho, top of Sani
Pass, 6-11-1973, Hilliard & Bunt 7102 (E, holo.; NU!).
Jessop (1997) in his account of Drimia in southern
Africa included Anthericum pusilliim Jacq. in the synon-
omy of D. marginata (Thunb.) Jessop. An examination
of the type illustration shows that it is in fact conspecif-
ic with D. physodes (Jacq.) Jessop and the transfer is
made below. This confusion by Jessop is quite inexplic-
able as the illustration leaves no doubt as to the true iden-
tity of the species. Although both D. marginata and D.
physodes have rather condensed, often corymbose inflores-
cences, the flowers in D. physodes are rotate and borne
on spreading, wiry pedicels, and the several, suberect
leaves are soft in substance. This is in contrast to D. mar-
ginata, which has distinctly campanulate flowers on
shorter, suberect pedicels and two or three firm, leathery
leaves with thickened, papillate margins.
Drimia physodes (Jacq.) Jessop
Anthericum physodes Jacq., Collecteana: 18. t. 418 (1795). Albuca
physodes (Jacq.) Ker GawL: t. 1046 (1807). Caesia physodes (Jacq.)
Sprang.: 88 (1825). Idothea physodes (Jacq.) Kunth: 345 (1843).
Urginea physodes (Jacq.) Baker: 217 (1873). Type: Jacq., leones 2
(16): t. 418 (1795).
Anthericum pusillum Jacq.: 18. t. 417 (1795). Caesia pusilla (Jacq.)
Spreng.: 88 (1825). Idothea drimioides Kunth: 345, nom. nov. for
Anthericum pusillum Jacq. Urginea pusilla (Jacq.) Baker: 217 (1873).
Type: Jacq., leones 2 (16): t. 417 (1795), syn. nov.
Mabberley (2002) has drawn out attention to the fact
that the combination Drimia revoluta (A.V.Duthie)
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, published in Goldblatt &
Manning (2000) is a later homonym for a species of
Ledebouria (Jessop 1970). We propose the new name
Drimia hesperantha for this night-blooming species.
Drimia hesperantha J.C. Manning & Goldblatt,
nom. nov., pro D. revoluta (A.V.Duthie) J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt in Strelitzia 9: 712 (2000), horn, illeg. non D.
revoluta (L.f.) Kunth (= Ledebouria revoluta (L.f.)
Jessop), Enumeratio plantarum 4: 341 (1843).
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1873. Revision of the genera and species of Scilleae and
Chlorogaleae. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 13: 209-292.
BAKER, J.G. 1875. Revision of the genera and species of Aspara-
gaceae. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 14: 508-632.
BAKER. J.G. 1897. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 253-528.
BENTHAM. G. & J.D. HOOKER. 1883. Genera plantarum, vol. 3. Reeve.
London.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING. J. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus of
the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical
Institute. Cape Town and Missouri Botanical Garden.
HILLIARD. O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1985, Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: XL Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 42: 227-260.
JACQUIN, N.J, VON. 1786-1787. Collecteana. Wappler, Vienna.
JESSOP, J.P. 1970. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae: 1. Scilla, Schizo-
carphus and Ledebouria. Journal of South African Botanr 36:
233-266.
JESSOP. J.P. 1977. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 7,
The taxonomy of Drimia and certain allied genera. Journal of
South African Botany 43: 265-319.
KER GAWLER, J.B, X'&Ql . Albuca physodes. Curtis’s Botanical Maga-
zine 26: t. 1046.
KUNTH, C.S. 1843. Enumeratio plantarum 4. Stuttgart, Tubingen.
LINNAEUS. C. fil. 1782 (‘178D. Supplementarum plantarum. Or-
phanotropheus, Braunschweig.
LOW. A.B. & REBELO. A.G. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho
and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism,
Pretoria.
MABBERLEY, D.J. 2002. Review: Cape plants. A conspectus of the
Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9, 2000, by P. Goldblatt &
J, Manning. Systematic Botany 27: 634, 635,
MANNING, J.C., REEVES. G. & FAY, M. in prep. Molecular system-
atics of Hyacinthaceae.
PFOSSER, M. & SPETA, F. 1999, Phylogenetics of Hyacinthaceae
based on plastid DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 86: 852-875,
SNUMAN, D. 1985. A new species of Tenicroa (Liliaceae-Scilleae) from
Namaqualand. South African Journal of Botany 5 1 : 283-286.
SPETA, F. 1998a. Systematische analyse der gattung Scilla L. s.l. (Hya-
cinthaceae). Phyton 38: 1-224.
SPETA. F. 1998b. Hyacinthaceae. In K. Kubitzki, The families and
genera of vascular plants 3: 261-285. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
SPRENGEL, K. 1825. Systema vegetabilium 2. Gottingen.
STEDJE, B. 1987. A revision of the genus Drimia (Hyacinthaceae) in
East Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 655-666.
STEDJE, B. 1996, Hyacinthaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropical
East Africa: 1-32.
STEDJE. B. 2001. The generic delimitation within Hyacinthaceae, a
comment on works by F, Speta. Bothalia 31: 192-195.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont. Cape Town.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical
Garden. P.O. Box 299, St Louis, Missouri 63166, USA,
MS. received: 2002-07-04.
112
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
LAMIACEAE
THE CORRECT NAME FOR SALVIA THERMARA
Salvia thennara, published in Bothalia 29: 100, 101
(Van Jaarsveld 1999) was named with reference to the
Goudini warm springs near Worcester, Western Cape. Mr
John Lavranos, a well-known succulent plant botanist,
who is Greek-speaking, brought to my attention that this
name is not correct. The Latin word for hot springs,
derived from Greek is thermae. In the genitive it is ther-
manim = of the hot springs.
The conect name is therefore:
Salvia thermarum Van Jaarsv.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Badsberg,
Goudini Spa, near Worcester on the Slanghoek trail, 15 Dec.
1997, (-CB), Van Jaarsveld & Vorster 15533 (NBG holo.).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am indebted to Mr John Lavranos for bringing this
error to my attention.
REFERENCE
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1999. Salvia thennara, a new species from
the Western Cape, South Africa. Bothalia 29: 100, 101.
E.J. VAN JAARSVELD*
* National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag XI, 7735
Claremont.
MS. received: 2002-10-23.
HYACINTHACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF ORNITHOGALUM FROM EASTERN CAPE. SOUTH AFRICA
Ornithogalum perdurans A.PDold & S.A. Ham-
mer, sp. nov., O. jimcifolio Jacq. affinis sed folio semi-
tereti pagina supera tenuiter canaliculata atroviridi et tota
pagina rugosa cum sulcis plus minusve parallelis trans-
versis undulatisque et subinde trichomatibus brevibus
rigidis albidis omnino differt.
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Komma-
dagga Earm, Kommadagga, (-BB), 500 m, 6-9-1999, Bold
& Hammer 4441 (GRA, holo.).
Plant xerophytic, dwarf. Bulb globose, epigeal, 20-30
mm diam.; outer tunics thin, wrinkled, pale brownish
grey, not neck-forming; inner tunics thin, clasping, per-
sistent, transparent with green venation, narrowing
abruptly to leaf base. Leaves 4-13, persistent, semi-terete,
linear, 40-60 x 1.0-1. 4 mm, erect, wiry, twisting 2-3
times, narrowly channelled adaxially, apices subacute,
dark green (almost black), entire surface rugose with ±
parallel, undulating, transverse grooves, with occasional
short, stiff, whitish trichomes 0.6 mm long throughout.
Raceme solitary, 20-40-flowered; peduncle 190-250 mm
long, up to 1.2 mm diam., stiffly erect, glabrous, dark
shiny green; bracts deltoid, 4.4 x 2.8 mm, auriculate,
clasping, attenuate, transparent with fawn-coloured keel;
lower pedicels longest, held at ± 45°, 7 mm long, up to 0.8
mm diam., green. Perianth segments spreading-reflexed;
inner elliptic, up to 6.4 x 2.8 mm; outer ovate, 7. 0-7.4 x
up to 3.2 mm, pale fawn-coloured with thin, green midrib
(turning brown at senescence), apices incurved. Stamens
patent; filaments lanceolate, broadest just above base,
flattened, white, outer up to 4.5 x 0.8 mm, inner up to 4.5
X 1.2- 1.6 mm; anthers ovoid, up to 1.4 x 0.6 mm; ovary
ovoid, up to 3 X 2 mm, green; style up to 2.5 mm long,
terete, white; stigma 3-lobed, densely glandular-haired.
1 mm broad, white. Capsule ovoid-acute, 4. 5-5.0 x 3-4
mm, deeply 3-lobed, membranous, fragile, apices sepa-
rating, becoming erect at dehiscence, pale brown, peri-
anth segments persistent, drying and withering irregular-
ly, equal to or just longer than capsule, pale brown with
dark brown midrib. Seed angular, up to 1.4 x 0.5 mm,
rugose, black. Eigure 10.
Ornithogalum perdurans falls into subgenus Aspasia
(Salisb.) Oberm. emend. U.Mull.-Doblies & D.Miilk-
Doblies section Linaspasia U.Mull.-Doblies & D.Miilk-
Doblies series Juncifolia U.Mull.-Doblies & D.Miilk-
Doblies together with O. juncifolium but is distinguished
from that species (Obermeyer 1978; Muller-Doblies &
Muller-Doblies 1996) primarily on vegetative characters,
although some differences also occur in floral morpholo-
gy (Table 2). The long-lived leaves (persisting for over
two years), are almost black in colour and are semi-terete
in section with a narrow groove along the upper surface
and weak longitudinal ribs on the abaxial surface, occa-
sional, scattered white trichomes are found throughout.
The entire leaf surface is rugose with ± parallel, undulat-
ing, transverse grooves within which fine sand particles
are held firmly (Eigure 11 A, B), giving the leaf a dry,
dusty appearance, not easily removed even with wash-
ing. This phenomenon in the suborder Liliiflorae has
been suggested to be an adaptation against herbivory,
high insolation and wind abrasion (Neinhuis et al. 1996).
The leaves do not sheath at the base and, being persis-
tent, do not form a fibrous neck of old leaf bases. The
specific epithet perdurans refers to the perennial leaves.
A single inflorescence is produced. The perianth seg-
ments are 6.4—7.4 mm long. The deciduous leaves of
O. juncifolium are filiform to linear (involute or flat),
conspicuously longitudinally ribbed abaxially with
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
113
FIGURE 10. — Oniitliogaliim perdu-
rcms, Dold & Hammer 4441 .
A. plant habit; B, inflores-
cence in bud; C, inflores-
cence at anthesis; D. peri-
anth. Scale bars: 10 mm.
strigose margins (Figure IIC) and are green in colour.
Sheathing at the base, the leaves form a membranous
neck that persists and often later becomes fibrous. One to
three inflorescences are produced. The perianth seg-
ments are 7-10 mm long.
Although Obermeyer (1978) includes 16 synonyms
for the variable O. juncifoliwn, only one of which is res-
urrected by Muller-Doblies & Mliller-Doblies (1996),
type material of all of these has been examined and the
leaf characters of O. perdumns are distinctive. O. comp-
TABLE 2. — Morphological differences between Ornithogaliim perdumns and O. juncifoliiim
114
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
FIGURE 1 1 . — A, B, D, Omithogulum perdunins, Dold & Hammer 4441 . A, leaf surface with sand particles removed showing undulating trans-
verse grooves; B, leaf surface showing strongly adhering sand particles; D, seed. C, O. jimcifolium, leaf showing longitudinally ribbed sur-
face with strigose margin, Dold 447. Scale bars; 100 pm.
turn Baker and O. sardienii Van Jaarsv, have erect, wiry
leaves resembling those of O. perdurans, however the
former is distinguished by its flattened lamina, without
adhering sand particles, and conspicuously thickened, ±
cartilaginous margin. Furthermore, the lower pedicels
are 2-3 mm long, whereas the lower pedicels of O, per-
durems are up to 7 mm long, O. sardienii is easily disting-
uished by its unique mucronate leaf and tuberculate
ovary,
Oruithogalnm perdurans is known from two localities.
Table Farm, 12 km west of Grahamstown (33°10'50"S
26°25'15"E), at an altitude of 550 m, with an average
annual rainfall of 389 mm (R, White pers. comm,. Table
Farm, Grahamstown 2002), and Kommadagga Farm, 60
km west of Grahamstown (33°09'30"S 25°53'00"E), at
500 m, with an average annual rainfall of 420 mm (J,
Moolman pers, comm,, Kommadagga Earm) (Eigure 12),
The vegetation type is classified as Eastern Mixed Nama-
Karoo by Hoffman ( 1996), which was previously known
as Fakse Karroid Broken Veld (Acocks 1988), Dominant
species at these localities are Aristida congesta, Felicia
muricata, Merxmuellera dislicha, Nenax inicrophylla,
Pentzia glohosa and Tragus koelerioides. Succulent
species include Corpuscularia lehnuinnii. Euphorbia
meloformis, E. gorgonis, Senecio radicans and Tricliodia-
dema hulhosum. d’he geological formation underlying
Table Farm is Grahamstown Silcrete that comprises sil-
crete remnants overlying kaolinized bedrock (Johnson &
Le Roux 1994). The soil is consequently very shallow and
nutrient poor. The rock types at Kommadagga Farm are
made up of the Kommadagga subgroup of the Witteberg
group comprising shales, siltstones and subordinate sand-
stones (Toerien & Hill 1989).
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
115
In his description of Ornithogalum unifolium (= O.
dyeri) from Table Farm, Dyer (1930) noted that the
species is associated with many other miniature species
of specialized growth form, viz., Eriospennum dregei,
Schizobasis cf. macowanii and Bulhine mesembryanthe-
moides — in reality an undescribed species (H. Baijnath
pers. comm.) referred to as Bulbine dime’ by Vander-
plank (1998). Dyer’s (1930) observation is supported by
the recent discovery of Brachystelma luteum (Peckover
1992) and a dwarf variant of Orthopterum waltoniae
(Hammer 2001) from the same locality. It is suggested
that this high succulent species diversity is found on the
ecotone between Succulent Thicket in the east and Nama-
Karoo in the west and deserves further investigation.
Dyer (1930) however, did not collect or record Ornitho-
galum perdurans despite its close proximity to O. uni-
folium, most likely due to its cryptic habit and evident
rarity. The lUCN (2000) conservation status category
Vulnerable (VU D2) is applied to this species.
Other specimens examined
O. comptum
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Uitenhage): Zwartkops River. (-DC),
no date. Ecklon & Zeyher 942 (SAM. isolecto., -PRE. photo.).
O. juncifolium
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): near Botha's
Railway Station, (DC), 4-10-1892, Wood 4774 (PRE? iso.); Fields Hill,
(-DD), no date. Wood 1973 (SAM. iso.. PRE, iso.); Umzindusi River
(precise locality unknown), 1875-1880, Rehmann 7636 (-PRE,
photo.).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Tulhagh): precise locality unknown.
1884, Pappe s.n. (SAM. iso., -PRE, photo). 3320 (Montagu): Whitehill
Karroo Garden. Laingsburg Dist., (-BA), 01-12-1941. Compton 12629
(BOL. holo.): Whitehill Karroo Garden. Laingsburg Dist., (-BA), 23-
10- 1943. Leighton 269 (BOL, holo.. PRE). 3321 (Ladismith):
Langeberg (precise locality unknown). Mossel Bay Division, (-CC,
-CD), 04-1914. Muir 1314 (BOL, holo., -PRE, photo). 3323
(Willowmore): headwaters of Wagenbooms River. (-CA). 11-1922,
Foiircade 2396 (BOL. holo.). 3418 (Simonstown): Patrysvlei (exact
locality not found), 03-02-1941. Salter 8602 (BOL, holo.).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3424 (Humansdorp): Witt Els Bosch, (-AA),
1 1- 1920. Fourcade 1011 (BOL. holo.); Kromme River, east of Assegai
Bosch. (-BB). no date, Fourcade 3940 (BOL, holo.). 3325 (Port
Elizabeth): Port Elizabeth neighbourhood, (-DC), no date. Drege 8674
(G, holo.. -PRE. photo.).
Locality unknown
WESTERN CAPE.— Cape of Good Hope. 1820, Bowie 1921/731,
(-PRE, icono., photo.).
O. perdurans
EASTERN CAPE. — 3326 (Grahamstown): Table Farm, 12 km we.st
of Grahamstown, (-BC), 550 m, 14-07-2001, Dold4431 (GRA).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Rhodes University Joint Research Council and the
Cactus and Succulent Society of America are thanked for
financial support. Nancy Lawrence is thanked for the
Latin diagnosis. The curators of BOL, G, NBG and PRE
are thanked for loans of type material.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1988. Veld Types of South Africa, edn 3. Memoirs of
the Botanical Sun-ey of South Africa No. 57.
DYER. R.A. 1930. New species of Ornithogalum and Albuca from
Albany Division. Records of the Albany Museum 4: 1 1 1-1 15.
HAMMER, S. 2001. Rustles of Spring. Mesemb Study Group Bulletin
16.2:31,32.
HOFFMAN, T. 1996. Eastern Mixed Nama Karoo. In A.B. Low & A.G.
Rebelo, Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism. Pretoria.
lUCN. 2000. lUCN Red List Categories. Species Survival Commis-
sion. lUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
JOHNSON. M.R. & LE ROUX, EG. 1994. The geology of the Grahams-
town area: explanation of sheet 3326, Scale 1: 250000. Council
for Geosciences. Geological Survey of South Africa,
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D. 1996, Revisionula
incompleta Omithogalorum Austro-Africanorum (Hyacinthaceae).
Feddes Repertorium 107: 361-548.
NEINHLIIS, C., MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D.
1996. Psammophora and other sand-coated plants from south-
ern Africa. Feddes Repertorium 107: 549-555.
OBERMEYER. A. A. 1978. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern
African species. Bothalia 12: 323-376.
PECKOVER, R. 1992. A new species of Brachystelma from the Grahams-
town area. Aloe 29: 66.
TOERIEN, D.K. & HILL, R.S. 1989. The geology of the Port Elizabeth
area; explanation of sheet 3324, Scale 1: 250000. Council for
Geosciences, Geological Survey of South Africa.
VANDERPLANK. H.J. 1998. Wildflowers of the Port Elizabeth area:
Swartkops to Sundays River. Bluecliff Publishing, Hunters Retreat,
Port Elizabeth.
A.P DOLD* and S.A. HAMMER**
* Selmar Schonland Herbarium, PO. Box 101, Rhodes University, 6140
Grahamstown, South Africa.
** Sphaeroid Institute, 845 Mason Road, Vista, California 92084, USA.
MS. received: 2002-04-10.
HYACINTHACEAE AND CRASSULACEAE
TWO NEW CREMNOPHILOUS TAXA FROM SEMI-ARID REGIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA
Cliffs are avoided by most humans due to their haz-
ardous nature. They represent one of the most unex-
plored habitats in South Africa and perhaps elsewhere on
the globe. Small wonder that recent studies on cliff faces
in South Africa have revealed several new succulent
plant taxa (Van Jaarsveld 1998, 1999, 2001), some
described below. Many succulent plants grow oppor-
tunistically on cliffs, whereas the described taxa below
are mainly encountered on cliffs. Such plants are termed
obligate cremnophytes (cremno is from the Greek word
for cliff and ‘-phyte’ is derived from the Greek word phu-
ton, meaning plant). Cliffs are thus their sole habitat and
refuge. Due to the vertical nature of cliffs, water runoff
is extreme, resulting in a mostly very dry habitat in
116
Bothalia33,l (2003)
which succulents are often a conspicuous feature in
South Africa. Cliffs are commonly encountered through-
out the mountainous parts of South Africa from the coast
to the high Drakensberg escarpment at 3 000 m altitude.
The vegetation of the dry river valleys of the Little Karoo
and the northern part of Eastern Cape (formerly known
as the Transkei) has not been well explored.
HYACINTHACEAE
1. Albuca thermarum Van Jaarsv., sp. nov., a A.
cremnophila Van Jaarsv. & A.E.van Wyk folds brev-
ioribus basibus persistentibus rete fibrosum facientibus,
floribus non secundis differt.
Inflorescentia ramosa, patens vel pendula, 400-800
mm longa; pedunculo 260-320 mm longo; bracteis
acuminatis, 20-30{-45) x 8-10 mm; pedicellis adscen-
dentibus vel erectis, basin versus 105-110 mm longis,
apicem versus minoribus, prope apicem ad 35 mm
longis. Flores erecti, tepalis luteoviridibus.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3321 (Ladismith); Badspooit,
near Calitzdorp Spa, sheer rock face, (-DA), 3-7-1994,
Van Jaarsveld 14152 (NBG, holo.).
Evergreen, solitai^, bulbous plants. Bnlh hypogeous
(rarely epigeous), ovoid, up to 70 x 55 mm; tunics fleshy,
imbricate, persistent, drying grey and exposing fibrous net-
work. Roots fleshy, white, up to 3 mm diam. Leaves in an
apical rosette, oblong, linear-attenuate, 300-550 x 20-30
mm, curved and drooping, channelled for most of their
length, succulent, firm, dark green, glabrous, faintly striat-
ed, but more so on adaxial surface; apex acute. Inflores-
cence a spreading to pendulous raceme, 400-800 mm long;
peduncle 260-320 mm long; bracts acuminate, 20-30(^5)
X 8-10 mm, green with white translucent margin; scape
8-10 mm diam. at base; pedicels ascending to erect,
105-110 mm long at base becoming smaller, up to 35 mm
long near top. Flowers erect; tepals yellowish green, tips
yellow to yellowish green, becoming white lower down,
but with a distinct green median stripe ± 3 mm wide; outer
tepals strap-shaped, up to 25 x 7 mm, apex cucullate; inner
tepals ovate, 20-21 mm long. Stamens', anthers oblong,
versatile, outer up to 2.5 x 1 .5 mm, inner up to 3.5 x 2.5
mm; filaments up to 15 mm long, up to 2 mm in diameter
at base (flattened); inner up to 13 mm long with a distinct,
short, channelled constriction ± 4.5 mm from base, lower
third broadly triangular ovate (3 mm wide at base), margin
membranous; apices of both inner and outer filaments pro-
jected forward and adpressed against style. Ovary oblong,
3-angled, up to 7 x 4 mm, stipitate for up to 1 .5 mm, each
angle with a raised emarginate base; style linear-trigonous,
clavate, up to 9 x 2 mm; stigma yellowish green. Capsule
up to 18 X 10 mm, grey-brown; valves splitting in upper
quarter. Seeds flat, 5-6 x 3 mm, angular and distinctly
wrinkled, blackish brown. Flowering time'. October and
November; seeds are released towards end of November/
early December. Figure 13.
Alhnca thermarum is characterized by its solitary
bulb, pendulous or curved, firm, channelled, dark green
leaves and yellowish green flowers. It is at once distin-
guished from A. cremnophila by the persistent leaf bases
exposing the fibrous network of old leaves, as well as its
FIGURE 13. — Inflorescence of Albuca thermarum.
flowers which are not secundly aixanged. Albuca cremno-
phila is larger than A. thermarum, its leaves have a basal
abscission layer and are therefore shed and do not devel-
op a fibrous network.
Plants of Albuca thermarum are usually found firmly
wedged in rock crevices or pockets on sheer cliff faces of
the Bokkeveld Group (Cape Super Group) at Badspoort
near Calitzdorp Spa (Figure 14). The substrate is slight-
ly acidic quartzitic sandstone. Associated species include
Aloe comptonii, Crassula badspoort ense, C. perforata,
C. rupestris, Cotyledon tomentosa subsp. tomentosa,
Haworthia Integra var. rycroftiana and Senecio ficoides.
Plants thrive in cultivation and when planted in contain-
ers the leaves become pendent. Unlike A. cremnophila,
the fruiting capsules do not fully dehisce, resulting in
slower seed release. The extended inflorescence and flat
seeds suggest dispersal by wind. The specific epithet
thermarum pertains to the nearby Calitzdorp Spa or ther-
mal spring where the plant was first recorded.
CRASSULACEAE
2. Crassula foveata Van Jaarsv., sp. nov. a C.
cymbiformi Toelken foliis linearo-lanceolatis vel paene
subulatis, superficie adaxiali dense foveata, et lobis
corollae usque ad 2 mm longis differt.
FIGURE 14. — Distribution of Albuca thermarum, ■; and Cra.ssuhi
foveata, •.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
117
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3228 (Butterworth): Colley-
wobbles, north-facing rock face, (-BA), 7-12-2000, Van
Jaarsveld & E/us 16652 (NBG, holo.).
Plants proliferating from base, forming small, dense
mats or clusters up to 140 mm diam. and up to 180 mm
tall when in flower. Roots fibrous. Blanches short, herba-
ceous. terete, 20^0 mm long, glabrous, lower down
sparsely strigose, 1-3 mm diam., green, becoming red-
dish when exposed to sunlight. Leaves dorsiventrally
compressed to almost subulate when fully turgid, in a
loose rosette, sessile, decussately airanged, sometimes
falcate and spreading, slightly recurved, becoming small-
er upwards, linear-lanceolate to triangular-lanceolate,
1 2-44 X 37 mm. abaxial surface rounded, glabrous, green
becoming reddish, pitted, adaxial surface canaliculate,
becoming flat when turgid, sparsely but distinctly pitted
(shallow leaf depressions); pits consisting of rounded,
reddish depressions, 0.3-0. 5 mm diam.; apex acute, apic-
Lilate; margin rounded, thickened, sparsely beset with
recurved, translucent cilia. Inflorescence a conspicuous
rounded to flat-topped thyrse, up to 180 mm high. 25-50
mm diam., bearing 1 to several dichasia, diurnal, sweetly
scented; peduncle with translucent, recurved hairs and
with a gradual transition from leaves to bracts, reddish;
bracts ascending, spreading, upper bracts cymbiform,
sparsely pitted, margin entire to sparsely ciliate. Flowei's
white to pale pink, buds up to 3 mm long, open flowers
up to 4 mm diam.; calyx lobes triangular. 1.5 x 0.8 mm,
with stout hairs at apex; corolla tubular, lobes spreading,
oblong-ovate to ovate-lanceolate, up to 2 mm long, acute,
white to pink. Stamens up to 1.5 mm long; anthers up to
0.1 mm long, yellowish. Squamae transversely oblong,
up to 0.4 X 0.1 mm. yellowish orange; carpels and style
up to 2 mm long. Flowering time: summer to early
autumn (February-April). Figure 15.
Crassiila foveata can be immediately recognized by
its linear-lanceolate, spreading, reddish green leaves,
densely spotted (pitted), hence the specific epithet, and
small, white to pink corolla lobes, up to 2 mm long. C.
foveata belongs to section Rosulares Haw. consisting of
25 species of which eight are cremnophilous. Members
of section Rosulares are characterized by their ciliate
leaves in a basal rosette which can become very large, as
in Ci'assula acinacifolia. In C. foveata the leaves are
arranged in a loose rosette and the margins are only
sparsely ciliate. Furthermore, the leaves are densely cov-
FIGURE 15. — Crassida foveata in flower (January).
FIGURE 16. — The habitat of Crassida foveata at Colleywohbles,
Eastern Cape.
ered with sunken, purplish hydathodes, resulting in the
spotted appearance. Other species with darker purple
markings with pitted hydathodes include Crassida exilis
subsp. sedifolia and subsp. cooperi, both dwarf
cremnophilous species from the central and western parts
of South Africa. In these subspecies the leaves are in
dense rosettes, the abaxial surface is without pitted areas,
and the adaxial surface is sparsely dotted. These plants
grow in dense, tight mats on cliff faces.
Crassida foveata grows on cliffs and steep outcrops
from 300-400 m in altitude, on mainly exposed, northern
and western aspects of Beaufort shale, Adelaide subgroup.
Karoo Supergroup, at Colleywobbles (Figures 14, 16).
Temperatures are high in summer and mild in winter. Rain-
fall occurs mainly in summer and ranges from 500-600
mm (thunder showers, October to May). Plants grow on
rocky ledges in shallow soil among leaf litter and often in
the shade of cliffs. The associated vegetation is thicket and
grassland and the plants share their habitat with Aloe
reynoldsii, Crassiila peifoliata var. minor. Cotyledon
orbiciilata. Euphorbia tirucalli and Ornithogalum longi-
bracteatum. The epithet /bvcrzto pertains to the spotted leaf
ornamentation found in these plants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful to Gerrit Germishuizen and Emsie du
Plessis for editing the text and Dr Hugh Glen for com-
piling the Latin diagnoses.
118
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
REFERENCES
VAN JAARSVELD, EJ. 1998. A new taxon, and new combinations in the
Gasteria carinata complex. Cactus and Succulent Journal ( US)
70: 65-70.
VAN JAARVELD, E.J. 1999. Five new cremnophilous taxa from semi-
arid regions in South Africa. Aloe 36: 71-74.
VAN JAARVELD. E.J. 2001. Crassula badspoortense Van Jaarsv., a
new species from the Western Cape. Aloe 38: 29, 30.
E.J. VAN JAARSVELD* and A.E. VAN WYK**
* National Botanical Instimte, Kirstenbosch, lYivate Bag X7, 7735 Claremont.
** H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany, University
of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2002-10-16.
ASTERACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF PHILYROPHYLLUM (GNAPHALIEAE) FROM NAMIBIA
Philyrophyllum brandbergense P.PJ. Herman, sp.
nov., P schinzii O.Hoffm. similis, sed capitulis maiori-
bus in corymbis paucicephalis, bracteis involucralibus
linearibus, sub-aequalibus, receptaculo disciformi, flos-
culis radii plus quam 40, flosculis disci plus quam 200,
corollarum illorum lobis apicalis 0.5 mm longis, setis
pappi cypselarum disci 5(-7), differ!.
TYPE. — South West Africa [Namibia], 2114(Uis): Brand-
berg, (-BA), waterhole no. 3, ‘Hungarob Ecke’, 8-8-1956,
Wiss 1505 (PRE, holo.!).
Suffrutex, 0.4-0. 6 m high; stems ribbed, covered with
soft, longish, erect hairs and glands. Leaves alternate,
petiolate, broadly triangular, 30-45 x 26^0 mm, base
cordate, apex acute, margin biserrate, main and secondary
veins prominent, 3 main veins from base of leaf, upper
surface glandular, with a few scattered long hairs, lower
surface glandular, hairy, hairs similar to that of stem, con-
centrated on main and secondary veins. Petiole 14-16
mm long, with indumentum similar to that of stem.
Capitula heterogamous radiate, cup-shaped, solitary or
up to 4 in open corymb, terminal on branchlets, sessile or
shortly pedunculate, apparently elongating in fruiting
stage; peduncle with similar indumentum as on stem.
Involucral bracts numerous, in ± 4 rows, subequal, linear
(Figure 17A), outer 8-9 x 0. 5-1.0 mm, with long acumi-
nate apex, ciliate on margins, more densely so in upper
half, glandular on backs, more densely so apically, inner
rows 6. 5-7. 5 x 0.5-0. 8 mm, with prominent main vein
forming a keel, margins of inner bracts scarious, ciliate in
upper part. Receptacle disc-like (Figure 17B), paleate,
naked towards centre, paleae similar to inner involucral
bracts but narrower. Ray florets up to 45, female, fertile.
FIGURE 17. — Involucral bracts and receptacles of Philyrophyllum
species. A, linear involucral bract; B, disc-like receptacle of P.
brandbergense, Merxmiiller & Giess 1666 (PRE); C, narrowly
elliptic involucral bract; D, conical receptacle of P. schinzii,
Story 5102 (PRE). Scale bar: 2 mm. Drawn by G. Condy.
corolla yellow, 8-9 mm long, tube 3. 5-4.0 mm long, lam-
ina 4. 5-5.0 mm long, 3-lobed at apex, glandular. Style
5.0-6. 5 mm long, style branches 1.0-1. 5 mm long, apex
obtuse, stigmatic areas separate, confluent at apex. Disc
florets up to 240, bisexual, fertile, corolla yellow, glandu-
lar, tubular, with slightly wider upper part, 4. 5-6. 5 mm
long, tube 2. 5-3. 5 mm long, limb 5-lobed, lobes 0.5 mm
EIGURE 18. — Scanning electron
micrographs of P. brandber-
gense, Wiss 1505 (PRE). A,
cypsela; B, granular surface
with twin hairs. Scale bars:
A. 500 pm; B, 100 pm.
Bothalia33,l (2003)
119
PRETORIA
iNAsSnaLE IIEKBARIUM. PRETORIA.
FIGURE 19. — Holotypc specimen
of Plulywphylliiin bmndher-
gense, Wiss J505 (PRE).
long. Anthers 2. 5-3. 5 mm long, calcarate and caudate,
apical appendage narrowly triangular. Style 5. 5-7.0 mm
long, style branches 1.0- 1.5 mm long, apex obtuse, stig-
matic areas separate basally, apically confluent. Cypsela
cylindric-ellipsoid, 1.2-1. 5 mm long, dark brown, surface
granular, appressed hairy with twin hairs (Figure 18).
Pappus: short scales in female florets; in disc florets, an
outer row of short scales and an inner row of 5(-7, rarely
up to 9) barbellate bristles, feathered at apex. Flowering
time: coincides with summer rainfall (Giess 1971 ), August
to March. Figure 19.
Distribution: apparently confined to the Brandberg area,
Namibia (Figure 20) hence the specific epithet, at an alti-
tude of less than 2 000 m on basalt and granite on the east-
ern and southern side of the mountain (P. Craven pers.
comm.). The Brandberg is known for its many endemics
(Giess 1971; Nordenstam 1974; Craven & Craven 2000).
The only other Philyropliyllum species, P. schinzii O.Hoffm.
occurs in Namibia, Botswana, Limpopo [Northern Province],
North-West; also Angola and Zimbabwe (Merxmiiller
1967; Wild 1980; Herman et al. 2000). Both Nordenstam
(1974) and Craven & Craven (2000) listed P. schinzii in
their floras of the Brandberg. They did not include the taxon
in their list of doubtful species, although a note on
Nordenstam’s specimen (Nordenstam 2548) indicated that
he had some reservations on the true identity of his speci-
men. It seems that the tme P schinzii does not occur on the
Brandberg. P brandhergense can thus be added to the list of
Brandberg endemics of Nordenstam (1974) and Craven &
120
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
TABLE 3. — Differences between P. schinzii and P. bnmdbergen.se
Craven (2000). Considering its limited distribution, this
taxon could be classified as VU D2 according to the 1994
lUCN Red List categories (Golding 2002). The endemics of
the Brandberg are not as safe from disturbance as explained
by Craven & Loots (2002).
Diagnostic characters: this species differs from P. schinzii
O.Hoffm. by the remarkable larger capitula, single or up
to 4 per corymb, with more numerous and differently
shaped involucral bracts (Figure 17A), disc-like recepta-
cle (Figure 17B), more numerous and larger ray florets,
more numerous disc florets with shorter apical lobes and
less pappus bristles in disc floret cypselas. The indumen-
tum of the leaves is also different: longish, soft hairs are
found on the leaves of P. brandbergense, whereas those
on the leaves of P. schinzii are short and rough to the
touch (Table 3). The leaves of both taxa have a disagree-
able odour when crushed.
FIGURE 20. — Distribution of Philyrophyllum brandbergense, ■; and
P. schinzii, •, in southern Africa.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 2114 (Uis): Brandberg, Pager Plain, near Whale Rock,
(-AB), Craven 2492 (WIND!); Sonuseb, (-AB), Craven 2208 (PREI,
WIND!); Tsisab Valley, (-BA), Giess 5005 (PRE!, WIND!), Merx-
miiller & Giess 1666 (PRE!, WIND!), Nordenstam 2548 (S, -PRE,
photo!), Strey 2402 (PRE!).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr H. Glen is thanked for the Latin translations, Ms
G. Condy for the line drawings and Mrs S. Turck for the
scanning of the herbarium specimen and other illustra-
tions. The staff of the Windhoek Herbarium is thanked
for providing grid references and herbarium specimens
on loan. The two referees are thanked for their valuable
comments.
REFERENCES
CRAVEN, P. & CRAVEN, D. 2000. The flora of the Brandberg, Nami-
bia. In A.H. Kirk-Spriggs & E. Marais, Biodiversity of the
Brandberg Massif, Namibia. Cimbebasia Memoir 9: 49-67.
CRAVEN, P. & LOOTS, S. 2002. Namibia. In J.S. Golding, Southern
African plant Red Data Lists. SABONET Report No. 14: 61-92.
GIESS, H.J.W. 1 97 1 . A preliminary vegetation map of South West Africa.
Dinteria 4.
GOLDING, J.S. (ed.). 2002. Southern African plant Red Data Lists.
SABONET Report No. 14.
HERMAN, P.P.J., RETIEF, E., KOEKEMOER, M. & WELMAN, W.G.
2000. Asteraceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern
Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 101-170. National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
MERXMULLER, H. 1967. Asteraceae. Prodromus einer Flora von Siid-
westafrika 139: 146, 147.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1974. The flora of the Brandberg. Dinteria 1 1.
WILD, H. 1980. The Compositae of the Flora zambesiaca area, 12 —
Inuleae, Kirkia 12: 23-113.
P.P.J. HERMAN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2002-07-18.
Bothalia 33.1: 121-134(2003)
A comparison of Mopaneveld vegetation in South Africa, Namibia
and Zimbabwe
F. SIEBERT*, G.J. BREDENKAMP* and S.J. SIEBERT*^
Keywords: Colophospennunt inopane. DECORANA, event-driven system, Mopani Veld, phytosociology, savanna, species richness, TWINSPAN.
vegetation type
ABSTRACT
Data from fifteen phytosociological studies were merged and classified to describe and compare the vegetation of geo-
graphically separated and climatically different Mopaneveld types in South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe. Seven vegetation
types and ten major plant communities were identified using TWINSPAN. Vegetation types were separated according to geo-
graphical regions. There were significant floristic affinities even though there were geological and climatic differences between
the regions. Plant communities were described according to vegetation structure, habitat and floristic composition. Although
environmental data were not adequate for a detailed ordination. DECORANA retlected the distribution of vegetation types and
major plant communities along environmental gradients. Limitations of large phytosociological syntheses were also addressed.
Species richness (alpha diversity) was calculated for each geographical region. The Musina (Messina) region north of the
Soutpansberg. South Africa, has the highest species richness, and Kaokoland. Namibia, the lowest. Due to irregular annual
rainfall patterns in semi-arid Mopaneveld. it is suggested that variance in species richness is associated with temporal vegeta-
tion states induced by rainfall events. Species richness of Mopaneveld was further compared with other savanna types.
INTRODUCTION
Colophospennum mopane (Kirk ex Benth.) Kirk ex
J. Leonard, commonly termed Mopane, is a xeric woody
savanna species of south tropical Africa where it occurs
in a wide range of vegetation types (Timberlake 1995),
collectively referred to as Mopaneveld or Mopani Veld.
As the name suggests, C. inopane is the dominant, as
well as the character species of this extensive veld type
(Winterbach et al. 2000). Floristically, Mopaneveld occurs
within the Zambezian Regional Centre of Endemism (Z),
Karoo-Namib Regional Centre of Endemism (KN) and
Kalahari-Highveld Regional Transition Zone (KH)
(White 1983). According to the structural classification
by White (1983), Mopaneveld is considered as Wood-
land (Z) and Scrub Woodland (Z & KH), as well as
Karoo Riparian Scrub Eorest and Bushland (KN).
Colophospermwn /no/rfluc-dominated vegetation types
(Mopaneveld) occur between 10°00' and 24°30' latitude
(Figure 1) within the 300 m to 1 000 m altitudinal range
(Madams 1990; Mapaure 1994; Timberlake 1995).
Mopaneveld stretches inland from the eastern escaip-
ment to the west coast of southern Africa and covers
± 555 000 km- (Mapaure 1994; Timberlake 1999). It is
prominent in the drier savanna zone of southern Africa,
which coincides with mean annual maximum tempera-
tures between 28°C and 35°C (Werger & Coetzee 1978;
Timberlake 1995) with little or no frost incidence in win-
ter. Mopaneveld is associated with fine-textured soils in
hot, dry valley bottoms and adjacent plains of large
rivers, such as the Limpopo, Save, Shire, Okavango,
Luangwa, Zambezi and Cunene (Wild & Barbosa 1967;
Werger & Coetzee 1978; Cole 1986; Mapaure 1994).
* African Vegetation and Plant Diversity Research Centre. Department
of Botany. University of Pretoria. 0002 Pretoria.
'Present address: SABONET. National Botanical Institute. Private Bag
XI 01. 0001 Pretoria.
MS, received: 2002-09-02.
Colophospennum mopane can tolerate extreme environ-
mental conditions (Timberlake 1999). In the southwest-
ern limits of its distribution range in Namibia, Mopane-
veld occurs in areas receiving 150 mm or less per annum,
while in its southeastern distribution range it receives
more than 800 mm per annum in some areas. These non-
specific sets of environmental conditions reflect the dis-
tribution of a single species, C. mopane, but little is
known of the associated vegetation within the distribu-
tion range of Mopaneveld (Acocks 1953). However,
since 1967, small-scale phytosociological studies have
contributed to the knowledge of vegetation in some parts
of the southern Mopaneveld (Table 1 ). Fifteen data sets
were available for this study, and considering the dis-
tance between east and west, this was still insufficient for
the typification of Mopaneveld across its range. How-
ever. the available information was regarded as baseline
data whereby the associated vegetation of Mopaneveld
could be compared for the first time.
The main objective of this study was therefore to clas-
sify, describe and compare the major plant communities
of Mopaneveld in three geographically separated and cli-
matically different areas of its distribution range to gain
a better understanding of the species assemblages and
richness of this vegetation type. These three regions
include ( 1 ) arid to semi-arid Namibian. (2) semi-arid to
sub-humid South African, and (3) sub-humid Zimbab-
wean Mopaneveld types.
METHODS
The first step in the synthesis of Mopaneveld vegeta-
tion was to initiate and create a database with compatible
phytosociological data sets from South Africa, Namibia
and Zimbabwe. All the available data sets that were con-
sidered reliable were included in the database. Reliable
data sets had to consist of a detailed lloristic survey of
both the woody and herbaceous strata. Adequate envi-
122
Bothalia33,l (2003)
Mopaneveld
1-15 Mopaneveld data sets (Table 1)
FIGURE 1. — Colophospennum mopane-donnnaXtA vegetation types in southern Africa (from Mapaure 1994) and approximate location of data
sets in the study area.
TABLE 1. — Mopaneveld data sets used forTWINSPAN analysis
Bothalia33,l (2003)
123
ronmental data for each data set should have been a cri-
terion for inclusion. However, due to limited environ-
mental data available from the selected studies, this
could not be implemented.
Compatible vegetation data on Mopaneveld were
obtained from 15 phytosociological studies (Table 1). A
total of ten data sets were selected from South Africa ( 1 761
releves), four from Namibia (295 releves) and one from
Zimbabwe (230 releves) (Figure 1). The phytosociological
data, consisting of 2 286 releves (of equal size, ± 200 nr)
and 1 465 species, were incorporated into a vegetation data-
base created in TURBO VEG (Hennekens 1996a). Due to
taxonomic disaccord in the acceptance of infraspecific taxa,
only generally used subspecies and varieties were included
in the data set. Infraspecific taxa not generally used were
combined under the relevant species name.
The first approximation of a vegetation classification,
based on this total floristic data set, was obtained by the
application of Two-Way Indicator Species Analysis
(TWINSPAN) (Hill 1979a) at a single division level in
MEGATAB (Hennekens 1996b). Lowest TWINSPAN
cutlevels (0-5-50 option) were optimal for separating dis-
tinct vegetation units in the data set. Azonal vegetation
(e.g. wetlands) in the data set was separated from Mopane-
veld vegetation by this single division procedure. This
procedure was repeated until all azonal types were iden-
tified. Forty azonal releves were omitted from the data
set and stored in a separate database for possible future
analysis. TWINSPAN was applied to the remaining
2 246 releves (0-5-25-50 cutlevels, 6 levels of division).
Forty-three vegetation clusters were separated by
TWINSPAN. A synoptic table was constructed to facili-
tate refinement of the table by means of Braun-Blanquet
procedures in MEGATAB (Hennekens 1996b). A species
was excluded if it had a frequency of less then 10%, and
a synreleve was excluded if it consisted of less than 5
releves. The refinement resulted in 29 synreleves, group-
ed into ten noda (Table 2), which represent seven vege-
tation types and ten major plant communities. A vegeta-
tion type and a major community probably represent syn-
taxa on order or alliance levels respectively. The hierar-
chical relationships between the vegetation units are
illustrated in Eigure 2. The final synoptic table (Table 2)
contains the constancy values of the species given in per-
centages. As higher syntaxa cannot be typified before the
lower syntaxa are formally described, no attempt was
made here to fix syntaxon names according to the
International Code for Syntaxonomical Nomenclature.
Probable environmental gradients were determined by
applying Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DC A) to
the floristic data set in the DECORANA computer pro-
gramme (Hill 1979b). DCA was applied to 29 synreleves
without data transformation (this was done before reduc-
ing the synreleves to 10 noda). Rare species were down-
weighted. Due to inadequate environmental data avail-
able from the selected data sets, interpretation of the
results could not be quantified.
A basic floristic analysis was undertaken to investi-
gate species richness and is presented as mean species
number per releve for each region (Table 3). Species
richness of Mopaneveld was also compared with other
savanna vegetation types; 1, microphyllous thornveld
{Acacia torfi/A-dominated); 2, mixed bushveld; and 3,
broad-leaved savanna {Combretum spp. -dominated).
This data was obtained from the savanna vegetation data
base housed at the University of Pretoria.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Application of TWINSPAN resulted in the following
hierarchical classification of the selected data sets into 10
noda:
1. Digitaria milanjiana-ColopIiospermum mopane Vege-
tation Type
1.1 Justicia flava-Colophospenniim mopane Major
Community
1.2 Setaria sphacelata-Colophospermwn mopane Major
Community
2. Croton megalohotiys-Colophospenniim mopane Vegeta-
tion Type
3. Cissus comifolia-Colophospennum mopane Vegetation
Type
4. Ptycholobiwn contortwn-CoIophospenmim mopane Vege-
tation Type
5. Enneapogon scoparius-CoIophospenmim mopane Vege-
tation Type
6. Boscia foetida-Colophospennnm mopane Vegetation Type
6.1 Eragrostis viscosa-Colophospernmm mopane Major
Community
6.2 Leiicosphaera bainesiCCoIophospenmim mopane Major
Community
7. Bauhinia petersiana-Colophospenmim mopane Vege-
tation Type
7.1 Philenoptera nelsii-Colophospennum mopane Major
Community
1 .2 Asparagus nelsii-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community
Vegetation Type 1 represents Zimbabwean Mopane-
veld, Types 2 to 4, South African Mopaneveld, and Types
6 and 7 represent Namibian Mopaneveld. The Ennea-
pogon scoparius-Colophospermum mopane Vegetation
Type (Type 5) probably represents a degraded type.
Description of vegetation types
Mopaneveld is often associated with the constant pre-
sence, mostly with high abundance values, of Colopho-
spernnim mopane, Dichrostachys cinerea. Tragus bert-
eronianus, Grewia bicolor and Commiphora africana
(species group A, Table 2). Other woody species that are
consistently associated with Colophospermum mopane
over much of its range include Acacia nigrescens, Aclan-
sonia digitata, Combretum elaeagnoides, C. hereroense.
Commiphora spp., Diospyros quiloensis, Grewia spp.,
Terminalia prunioides, T stuhlmannii and Ximenia
americana (Timberlake 1999). The Mopaneveld in South
Africa and southeastern Zimbabwe is clearly separated
from the Namibian Mopaneveld by the presence of species
in species groups K and M (Table 2). Species of signifi-
124
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
TABLE 2. — Abbreviated synoptic table of Mopaneveld vegetation types in the study area
Vegetation type 1.1 1.2 2 3 4 5 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2
Number of releves 7/ IM 92 1375 157 68 144 147 51 10
Species group A
Species group D
Species group E
Species group F
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
125
TABLE 2. — Abbreviated synoptic table of Mopaneveld vegetation types in the study area (cont.)
Species group H
Eragrostis rigidior | 38 32 5 36 | 3 1
126
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
TABLE 2. — Abbreviated synoptic table of Mopaneveld vegetation types in the study area (cont.)
Bothalia33,l (2003)
127
TABLE 2. — Abbreviated synoptic table of Mopaneveld vegetation types in the study area (cont.)
Species group V
Species group Z
cant differential value include woody species such as
Grewia monticola, Lcmnea schweinfiirthii, Philenoptera
violacea, Maeriia parx’ifolia (species group K. Table 2),
Acacia nigrescens, Sclerocarya hirrea, Alhizia lian’eyi
and Acacia gerrardii (species group M, Table 2).
Important species in the herbaceous layer include
Urochloa mosamhicensis, Commelina henghalensis (spe-
cies group K, Table 2) and Eragrostis superba (species
group M, Table 2). The Namibian Mopaneveld differs
from the eastern Mopaneveld by species in species group
Z, such as Schmidtia kalihariensis, Pngonarthria fleckii
and Acacia erioloha. Differences in geological substrates
as well as annual precipitation are the major factors driving
floristic dissimilarities between the eastern and western
Mopaneveld (Figure 2; Du Plessis 2001). Despite their
differences, floristic affinities can be observed in the
128
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
TABLE 3. — Species richness for Mopaneveld and other savanna
types presented as the mean number of species per releve
* KNP, Kruger National Park
non-specific distribution of certain species, such as those
listed in species groups A, R, V, W and X (Table 2).
Vegetation types proved sufficiently homogeneous at the
scale of this study to be regarded as single units. The descrip-
tion of the seven proposed Mopaneveld vegetation types
follows as an amplification of the suggested Commiphoro
mollis-Colophospennetea mopaui of the Central Savanna
Biome, South Africa (Winterbach et al. 2000).
1 . Digitaria milanjiana-Colophospermum mopane Vege-
tation Type
Data set 7 (Table 1).
This vegetation type represents southeastern Zim-
babwean Mopaneveld of the Save River Valley. TWIN-
SPAN distinctly separated it from the South African and
Namibian Mopaneveld (Table 2; Figure 2). This type is
associated with areas receiving ± 530 mm rainfall per
annum. A detailed classification and description of this
vegetation type was prepared by Hin (2000). Diagnostic
species are listed in species group B (Table 2). High con-
stancy values in species group C resulted in a division of
this vegetation type into two major communities: the
Justicia flava-Colophospermum mopane Major Com-
munity (Type 1 . 1 ) on deep, alluvial soils, and the Setaria
sphacelata-Colophospermum mopane Major Community
(Type 1.2) on shallow soils of rocky outcrops and insel-
bergs. Species richness of this plant community is low in
comparison with other Mopaneveld regions (Table 3).
1 . 1 Justicia flava-Colophospermum mopane Major Com-
munity
Vegetation of this community is confined to valleys and
depressions, typically those found in the Save River Valley,
Zimbabwe. This tall valley bushveld on clayey alluvium is
characterized by woody species such as Zanthoxylum
capense and Boscia mossambicensis (species group C).
The tree layer is well developed (75% cover in certain
areas) with individuals of Colophospermum mopane
(species group A) reaching heights of 16-20 m (Hin 2000).
The shrub layer is less conspicuous. Herbaceous cover is
high with dominant grass species such as Sporobolus nitens
and Enteropogon monostachys (species group C, Table 2).
Diagnostic species are listed in species group C (Table 2)
and consist mostly of herbaceous species.
1.2 Setaria sphacelata-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community
This major community is associated with disturbed
land, rocky outcrops and inselbergs on well-drained, shal-
low, coarse sandy soils derived mainly from gneiss. The
shrub layer is better developed than that of the Justicia
F'lGURE 2. — Dendrogram depicting the TWINSPAN division of Mopaneveld vegetation in the study area. R, annual rainfall; G, major rocks.
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
129
flava-Colophospermiim mopane Major Community. Tree
species reach heights of 15-25 m, making it closed wood-
land. The herbaceous layer is well developed with domi-
nant grass species such as Digitaria milanjiana (species
group B) and Setaria sphacelata (species group D).
Although this community is not characterized by a
strong diagnostic species group, its existence is sup-
ported by the very low constancy of species character-
istic of the Justicia flava-Colophospermum mopane
Major Community (species group C) and a high fre-
quency of species such as Setaria sphacelata (species
group D). Some diagnostic species for this community,
such as the shrub Phyllanthiis reticiilatiis (species
group D), is representative of riparian habitats. Floristic
relationships between savanna vegetation of rocky hills
and riverbanks have been recorded before in the arid
Lowveld vegetation of South Africa (Bredenkamp &
Deutschliinder 1995).
2. Croton megalobotrys-Colophospernnim mopane Vege-
tation Type
Data sets 1 , 3, 6, 7, 11 & 14 (Table 1 ).
This vegetation type is associated with South African
and Zimbabwean riparian vegetation on alluvium,
although it does not represent typical azonal (riparian)
vegetation due to the high abundance of terrestrial plant
species such as C. mopane (species group A). Mopane is
known to grow on a wide variety of soils, including ‘wet’
soils of alluvial origin (Van Rooyen 1978; Biggs 1979;
O’Connor & Campbell 1986). This type therefore repre-
sents a transition between true terrestrial and riparian
vegetation. Annual rainfall varies between 350 and 800
mm. The tree layer is well developed and often forms
tall, closed woodland (Van Rooyen 1981). Woody plant
species of floodplains and riverbanks, such as Croton
megalobotrys. Ficus sycomoriis, Hyphaene coriaceae,
Phoenix reclinata and Spirostachys africana (species
group E) are abundant. Grass species adapted to moist
conditions, such as Sporoboliis fimbriatiis (species group
E), characterize this vegetation type.
Diagnostic species are listed in species group E (Table
2). This vegetation type shows little relationship with the
western (Namibian) Mopaneveld.
3. Cissiis comifolia-Colophospennum mopane Vegetation
Type
Datasets 1, 3, 5, 6, 11, 13 & 14 (Table 1).
A large number of releves ( 1 375) were classified
under this vegetation type, which is predominantly found
in the South African Lowveld Mopaneveld, covering an
area of ± 7 250 km^ (Gertenbach 1987). Most of the
releves of this vegetation type were taken from studies in
the Kruger National Park, South Africa (e.g. data sets 3,
5, 6 & 14, Table 1). It is comparable to Broad-
Sclerophyll Arid Bushveld (Werger & Coetzee 1978)
with an annual rainfall of 350-600 mm (Gertenbach
1980).
The structure of this community varies according to
geology — from tall woodland (on shale) to dwarf shrub (on
basalt). Diagnostic species are listed in species group F
(Table 2). Other species commonly associated with this
vegetation type include Combretum apiculaturn (species
group R), Grewia bicolor. Commiphora africana (species
group A), and Schmidtia pappophoroides (species group
V) in Mopane Bushveld, and Acacia nigrescens (species
group M), Dalbergia melanoxylon (species group F),
Combretum imberbe (species group R), Themeda triandra
and Bothriochloa radicans (species group F) in Mopane
Shrubveld (Low & Rebelo 1996). Species richness varies
between values of 25 in the northern, sandy areas to 41 in
the central district on clayey soil (Table 3). This vegetation
type has a poor floristic affinity with the Namibian Mopane-
veld (Table 2; Figure 2) due to higher annual rainfall and
differences in geological substrates (Figure 2).
4. Ptycholobium contortum-Colophospennum mopane Vege-
tation Type
Data sets 1, 2, 3 & 15 (Table 1).
This vegetation type is confined to the Mopaneveld
north of the Soutpansberg in the Limpopo River Valley,
South Africa. The vegetation of the Messina Experi-
mental Farm (Dekker & Van Rooyen 1995, Data set 2) is
well represented in this vegetation type. This low, open
to closed woodland type covers an area of 2 037 km^
between 300 and 780 m altitude (Louw 1970) and re-
ceives ± 350 mm rainfall per annum. The geology of this
area comprises mosaic formations of metamorphic rocks
belonging to the Archaean Complex.
Several Commiphora species are known to be diag-
nostic for this Mopaneveld (Louw 1970), of which C.
teniiipetiolata, C. edidis (species group I), C. mollis (spe-
cies group J) and C. africana (species group A) are abun-
dant. Another conspicuous feature of this vegetation type
is the scattered stands of Adansonia digitata (species
group I) on sandy, undulating plains derived from gran-
ite and gneiss (Dekker & Van Rooyen 1995). Diagnostic
species are listed in species group I (Table 2). The high-
est species richness values in the study area of Musina
(Messina) (Table 3) were recorded for this vegetation type.
Floristically it is related to the Cissus cornifolia-Colo-
phospermum mopane Vegetation Type (species group J),
although it has a more diverse floristic composition, es-
pecially in the woody component. Although this vegeta-
tion type occurs under the most arid conditions for Mo-
paneveld in South Africa, it is not similar to the
Namibian Mopaneveld.
5. Enneapogon scoparius-Colophospemnim mopane Vege-
tation Type
Data sets 1, 8 & 15 (Table 1).
Releves delineating this vegetation type were sampled
in areas that were overgrazed, used for military training
and as dumping sites (Beck 1998). In addition, some
releves were sampled during sustained drought condi-
tions. Based on general climatic conditions and location,
it was expected that these data sets (data sets 1, 8 & 15,
130
Bothalia33,l (2003)
Table 1) would be classified under the Ptycholohium
contortum-Colophospermiim mopane Vegetation Type,
but due to harsh environmental conditions it represents
serai communities in semi-arid South African Mopane-
veld. Diagnostic species are listed in species group L
(Table 2). Especially grass species are conspicuous and
include Panicum natalense (species group L), Ennea-
pogon scoparius (species group R), Stipagrostis unip-
lumis (species group V), Enneapogon cenchroides,
Melinis repens (species group W), Aristida adscensionis
and Eragrostis trichophora (species group AA). These
species are generally unpalatable grasses, typically asso-
ciated with disturbed areas.
6. Boscia foetida-Colophospermim mopane Vegetation Type
This vegetation type represents the semi-arid to arid
Mopaneveld of Namibia. It is strongly associated with
harsh environments on mainly sand, gravel and calcrete
of the Kalahari Group and dolomites, limestone, shale,
quartzite and conglomerate of the Damara Sequence.
This shrubveld to open tree savanna is characterized by
species group N (Table 2). The conspicuous tree, Boscia
foetida, which is known for its association with semi-arid
environments, is diagnostic for this community.
6.1 Eragrostis viscosa-Colophospernmm mopane Major
Community
Data sets 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 15 (Table 1).
Although this community is differentiated only by three
species (species group O), it comprises elements of extreme
habitats such as Mopaneveld of the Cuvelai Delta on aeo-
lian sands of the Kalahari Group (Owamboland, Namibia)
and the arid Kaokoland (northern Namibia). Soils are gen-
erally sandy with a clayey or calcareous subsoil and include
mopane shrubveld (Owamboland, 500 mm rainfall/annum)
and open tree/ shrub savanna (Kaokoland, 200 mm rain-
fall/annum). Releves from the Honnet Nature Reserve,
north of the Soutpansberg, South Africa (Visser et al. 1996)
are more associated with this community than with its near-
est neighbour, the Ptycholobium contortnm-Colophospemuim
nwpane Vegetation Type (type 4).
Tree species such as Boscia alhitrunca (species group
V) and Terminalia prunioides (species group W) domi-
nate the tree layer, whereas Stipagrostis imiplnmis (species
group V), Enneapogon cenchroides (species group W)
and Eragrostis trichophora (species group AA) are domi-
nant grass species.
This community needs refinement on a smaller scale,
becau.se heterogeneous combinations could not be clear-
ly expressed by TWINSPAN procedures on the large
scale of this study. Species richness of the Kaokoland
parts of this community is the lowest for the study area
(i.e. 12, Table 3) and moderate to low (18, Table 3) in the
Owamboland region.
6.2 Ixmcosphaera hainesii-Colophospermwn mopane Major
Community
Data .sets 9 & 10 (Table 1 ).
This dry, deciduous tree savanna (300-450 mm annual
rainfall) is found in the Etosha National Park and sur-
rounding areas in Namibia and occurs on calcareous
ridges and plains of the Kalahari Group. Diagnostic
species are listed in species group P (Table 2), including
the prominent Leucosphaera bainesii, which is known to
be associated with calcareous soils. Colophospermum
mopane individuals on these sodium-rich soils are usually
only 2-6 m tall and are associated with a poorly developed
herbaceous layer (Le Roux 1980; Timberlake 1995). On
very shallow lithosols of calcrete substrates, C. mopane is
accompanied by Acacia reficiens (species group U) and
Terminalia prunioides (species group W) in the tree stra-
tum, and Boscia foetida (species group N), Monechma
genistifolium and PetaUdium engleranum (species group
P) in the shrub stratum. In sites where aeolian sands cover
calcrete boulders, Catophractes alexandri, Otoptera
burchellii (species group U), Rhigozum brevispinosum and
Mimdulea sericea (species group Z) become prominent.
The herbaceous layer is well developed and includes
species such as Anthephora schinzii (species group N),
Enneapogon desvauxii, Stipagrostis hirtigluma (species
group P) and Enneapogon cenchroides (species group W).
Lithosols derived from andesites are relatively fertile and
produce a heterogeneous vegetation type on this hilly
landscape. The herbaceous stratum is perennial with
Eragrostis nindensis (species group P) being very promi-
nent (Le Roux et al. 1988).
This community is distinctly separated from commu-
nity 6.1 and shares a number of species with the Phile-
noptera nelsii-Colophospermum mopane Major Com-
munity (Type 7.1) (species group U). Species richness
for this community is moderate to high (i.e. 28 species
per releve. Table 3).
7. Baidiinia petersiana-Colophospermum mopane Vege-
tation Type
This vegetation type is confined to deep Kalahari
sands that are mainly of aeolian origin. Annual rainfall
varies between 300 mm and 400 mm. This sandy, dry
bushveld is best represented in the sandveld areas of
Etosha National Park, Namibia. Diagnostic species are
listed in species group S (Table 2). Although Colopho-
spermum mopane is often associated with heavier, clayey
soils in higher rainfall areas, it is also well represented
within this vegetation type (species group A).
7.1 Philenoptera nelsii-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community
Data sets 4 & 9 (Table 1).
This community represents vegetation associated with
Kalahari sands of aeolian origin within the arid Nami-
bian Mopaneveld. Several species indicative of soils
containing a high sandy content characterize this com-
munity (species group T) and include Philenoptera nel-
sii, Acanthosicyos naudinianus, Requienia sphaerosper-
ma and Harpagophytum procumbens. Habitats typical of
this community include Kowares Sandy Mopane Shrub-
veld (Kaokoland section, Etosha National Park) and the
Sandy Shrub Mopaneveld (Sandveld areas, Etosha
National Park), often overlying calcrete (Le Roux 1980).
The lloristic component of calcareous substrates links
Bothalia33,l (2003)
131
this community to the Leiicosphaera hainesii-Colo-
phospermum mopane Major Community (species group
U). Species in species group V links this community to
the South African Mopaneveld types. Species richness
for this community is 35 (Table 3), which is moderate to
high when compared to other types.
7.2 Asparagus nelsii-Colophospennum mopane Major
Community
Data sets 10 & 12 (Table 1).
This unique community of only 10 releves represents
the moister northeastern Namibian Mopaneveld, adja-
cent to the Caprivi. These mopane woodlands lie in an
area of old river drainage lines, which are covered by
aeolian sand deposits (Mendelsohn & Roberts 1997).
This dry, early-deciduous savanna woodland includes
species that prefer deep sandy soils, such as Reqiiienia
pseudosphaerosperma, Hyphaene petersiana, Harpago-
phytiim zeyheri and Dichapetalum cymosum (species
group Y). Other diagnostic species are listed in species
group Y. It shows a strong floristic affinity with the
Philenoptera nelsii-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community (Type 7.1 ). The environmental conditions of
this community are different from any other vegetation
type or major plant community. Although it represents
moister Namibian Mopaneveld, moisture conditions are
still low and erratic, which probably relate it to the
Philenoptera nelsii-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community. Species richness is low (i.e. 18, Table 3),
especially when compared with community 7.1.
Evaluation of vegetation types
Although the Zimbabwean data set from the Save
River Valley provided baseline information for the iden-
tification of the Digitaria milanjiana-Colophospermum
mopane Vegetation Type and a comparison with other
Mopaneveld types, comprehensive vegetation studies of
other types in Zimbabwean Mopaneveld would need to
be included for a more detailed account.
The Croton megalohotrys-Colophospermiim mopane
Vegetation Type does not include riparian vegetation
from Namibia. In Namibia, Mopaneveld is restricted to
the upper clayey soils where the rivers are deeply in-
cised. Shallow rivers tend to dry out seasonally, which
consequently gives C. mopane the ability to inhabit these
dry, sandy washes. In the Cuvelai Delta, northern
Namibia, isolated patches of Mopaneveld are often asso-
ciated with upland islands within the broad, sandy, cal-
careous shores. Local-scale studies on Namibian Mopane-
veld could separate these discontinuous Mopaneveld
patches within the Cuvelai Delta.
The Cissiis cornifolia-Colophospermum mopane
Vegetation Type is more diverse than what is obvious in
Table 2. These 1 375 releves of the South African
Lowveld Mopaneveld were classified independently (Du
Plessis 2001), and revealed the identification of at least
four different major plant communities on different geo-
logical substrates, namely the (a) Terminalia sericea-
Colophospermum mopane Community on sandy soils
derived from alluvium, shale, andesite and the Malvemia
Formation; (b) Acacia nigrescens-Colophospermurn
mopane Community on heavy clays derived from basalt
and gabbro; (c) Euclea divinorum-Colophospermurn
mopane Community on clayey soils derived from shale
of the Ecca Group; and (d) Comhretum apiculatum-
Colophospermum mopane Community on coarse, well-
drained, sandy soils derived from granite and gneiss.
Differentiation in geological parent material is responsi-
ble for the distinct physiognomical variance typically
associated with the South African Lowveld Mopaneveld:
Mopane Shrubveld and Mopane Bushveld (Low &
Rebelo 1996, types 9 & 10). Mopane Shrubveld occurs
on flat plains of vertic or near-vertic clays derived main-
ly from igneous gabbro and basalt. The shrubveld type is
generally dominated by a stunted and multi-stemmed
shrubby growth of Colophospermum mopane. In contrast
with Mopane Shrubveld, Mopane Bushveld is character-
ized by a fairly dense growth of C. mopane trees occur-
ring on undulating landscapes derived from basalt, shale,
solonetzes and coarse, sandy soils derived from granite
(Van Rooyen & Bredenkamp 1998).
The area north of the Soutpansberg is associated with
a diversity of geological substrates. However, the Ptycholo-
bium contortum-Colophospermum mopane Vegetation
Type was not separated into lower syntaxa. A further
classification of Mopaneveld vegetation data from this
region should reveal the identification of different plant
communities based on geology. More data sets would be
needed for a detailed synthesis.
As a serai vegetation unit, it may be questioned
whether the Enneapogon scopariiis-Colophospermum
mopane Vegetation Type carries sufficient weight to be
treated as an independent vegetation type. Serai commu-
nities are temporal variations of ‘true’ communities and
can therefore be regarded as a variant of such communi-
ties. On a scale as large as the Mopaneveld, it can, how-
ever, be valued as a vegetation type since it is likely to be
repeated spatially. On a local scale, it should rather be
considered a variant.
Colophospermum mopane-dom\x\dXtd vegetation of
Namibia is more differentiated than Giess (1998) sug-
gested (Table 2). Mopane savanna in Namibia comprises
elements of Dry Early-Deciduous Shrub Savanna (Wild &
Barbosa 1967), elements of the Early-Deciduous Savanna
Woodland and an Intermediate Deciduous Savanna
(Timberlake 1995). According to descriptions of Colo-
phospermum /?zo/jfl/ze-dominated vegetation in Namibia
(Giess 1998), the Boscia foetida-Colophospermum mo-
pane Vegetation Type represents the intermediate lower,
sparser Dry Deciduous Mopane Savanna.
The Eragrostis viscosa-Colophospennum mopane Major
Community, Type 6.1, comprises communities that are
not reflected at this scale: Owamboland and Kaokoland.
Owamboland (northern Namibia) is a broad plain about
1 100 m above sea level. Aeolian Kalahari sands of vary-
ing depth cover the area with scattered patches of cal-
careous substrates. Oshanas are seasonally flooded
watercourses of the Cuvelai Delta in Owamboland.
Mopaneveld occurs as interfaces on slightly elevated ter-
races between the oshanas. Dominant trees include
132
Bothalia 33,1 (2003)
Colophospermiim mopane, several species of Acacia,
Combretum and Commiphora, the palm Hyphaene peter-
siana, Adansonia digitata, Terminalia prunioides and T.
sericea. However, in the dry, central parts of the Kaoko-
land escarpment, an open tree savanna predominates at
an altitude between 700 m and 1 100 m. Being the domi-
nant woody species for this open savanna, Colopho-
spermum mopane occurs here as a small tree (height of
2.5 m). Accompanying species in this savanna type
include Catophractes alexandri, Terminalia prunioides,
Combretum apiculatum. Euphorbia damarana, Ceraria
longipedunculata. Commiphora multijuga, C. virgata, C.
africana, Maerua schinzii and Sesamothamnus guerichii
(Werger & Coetzee 1978). The herbaceous stratum is
poorly developed, with Schmidtia kalihariensis (species
group Z) the dominant grass. The strange grouping of
releves from Honnet Nature Reserve (South Africa) with
the Eragrostis viscosa-Colophospermum mopane Major
Community (Namibia) can probably be explained by the
dry conditions under which sampling were undertaken. At
the time of sampling (1995), the vegetation of the Honnet
Nature Reserve was in a degraded state, especially the
herbaceous component, which relates it to a certain state
in the semi-arid/arid Namibian Mopaneveld.
The Bauhinia petersiana-CoIophospermum mopane
Vegetation Type is different from all other Mopaneveld
types in that it is associated with sandy, rather than
clayey soil. The Philenoptera nelsii-Colophospermum
mopane Major Community, Type 7.1, is floristically
linked to other types across the Mopaneveld range
(species groups V, W & X) due to its calcareous sub-
strate. Deep Kalahari sand on which the Asparagus nel-
sii-Colophospermum mopane Major Community, Type
12, occurs, makes it is floristically poorly related to
other Mopaneveld types. Its relationship with Namibian
Mopaneveld (species group Z) is due to similar climatic
conditions. Despite these poor relationships and the high
sand content of the soil, Colophospermum mopane has a
frequency of 80% in this type, which suggests a sandy
topsoil, underlain by clayey subsoil.
Ordination
Vegetation types and major plant communities along
the first and third axes of a Detrended Correspondence
Analysis (DECORANA) scatter diagram is shown in
Figure 3. Due to insufficient environmental data avail-
able, no clear explanation could be found for the distribu-
tion of the vegetation types along environmental axes.
The ordination, however, supports the geographical and
climatic (mean annual rainfall) separations between
Zimbabwe (far left). South Africa (middle) and Namibia
(far right) (Axis 1, Figure 3). The distribution of vegeta-
tion types and major plant communities along the verti-
cal axis from bottom to top (Axis 3) probably follows a
decrease in soil depth and an increase in clay content
(Figure 3). Soil moisture availability is a major factor
that determines the distribution of Mopaneveld vegeta-
tion types (Timberlake et al. 1993). Although all inter-
acting factors determining soil moisture availability were
not assessed (i.e. rainfall, topography, soil texture and
depth, drainage and rooting habit), the interaction of soil
depth, soil texture and annual rainfall had a significant
influence on the distribution of vegetation types along a
soil moisture availability gradient (Figure 3).
Species richness
There are distinct differences in species richness within
Mopaneveld of different regions (Table 3). Despite its high-
er rainfall, Zimbabwean Mopaneveld has lower species
richness than South Africa. Kaokoland (Namibia) has the
lowest species richness in Mopaneveld, whereas Musina
(Messina) has the highest. Etosha has the highest species
richness in Namibia, probably due to the diversity in land-
scapes. Species richness in the South African Mopaneveld
varies considerably (from 15 to 45). However, the data sets
selected for species richness calculation of Mopaneveld in
South Africa were sampled during different rainfall condi-
tions. For instance, the area north of the Soutpansberg nor-
mally receives + 350 mm rainfall per annum, but Honnet
FIGURE 3. — Ordiiialion diagram of axes 1 and 3 illustrating the distribution of Mopaneveld vegetation types along environmental gradients.
Bothalia33,l (2003)
133
Nature Reserve (15, Table 3) was surveyed during a drought
year (rainfall less than 100 mm/annum), and Musina
(Messina) (45, Table 3) was surveyed during a wetter year
after a drought (>200 mm/annum). It has been shown that
perennial herbaceous species disappear after a drought
event in a semi-arid savanna, but are replaced by annuals
after the first rainfall event (O’Connor 1999). According to
Oelofse et al. (2000), Mopaneveld vegetation follows a
‘state-and- transition’ model for vegetation change, which
suggests that the herbaceous layer dies back after an event
such as overgrazing, fire or drought, but responds rapidly to
an event such as rainfall. The response to rainfall is usually
a dense cover of many different annual species, which tem-
porarily induces an increase in plant species richness.
Furthermore, species richness in Mopaneveld is often
dependent on the cover of Colophospennum mopane. High
cover of C. mopane results in low species richness, where-
as a higher species richness is noted in areas with low C.
mopane cover (O’Connor 1992). It can therefore be sug-
gested that high annual rainfall and high tree cover (e.g.
Zimbabwean Mopaneveld) do not induce species richness,
but rather unpredictable rainfall events and low tree cover in
semi-arid areas such as the Musina (Messina) region.
When species richness of other savanna types are com-
pared with Mopaneveld types, Mopaneveld appears to be
richer than expected (Table 3). This comparison of species
richness (alpha-diversity), however, does not suggest high
species diversity. According to Timberlake (1995)
Mopaneveld has a low gamma diversity due to typically
associated species being common and present in most veg-
etation types across its range. These typical tree species
include Acacia nigrescens, A. nilotica, Adansonia digitata,
Albizia han'eyi, Balanites spp., Combretiim apiculatunu C.
hereroense. Commiphora spp., Dalbergia melanoxylon,
Diospyros cpdloensis, Erythroxylum zambesiacum, Kirkia
acuminata, Sclerocary’a birrea, Tenninalia primioides, T
stuhlmannii and Ziziphiis niiicronata. Shrubs include Com-
bretum elaeagnoides, Dichrostachys cinerea. Gardenia re-
siniflua, Grewia spp., Ximenia americana and species of
the family Capparidaceae. Mopaneveld is therefore species
rich, but low in species diversity.
Limitations
Broad-scale phytosociological syntheses have limita-
tions, which should not be ignored:
1 . Adequate phytosociological data sets were limited for
Zimbabwe and Namibia. These regions are therefore weak-
ly represented in this comparative study. Consequently, this
study only touches on differences and associations between
the geographically separated Mopaneveld regions and is
not a detailed account of the region.
2. Limited environmental data were available from
the selected studies, which influenced the interpretation
of results (e.g. ordination). Dealing with this constraint
emphasized the need for the collection of detailed envi-
ronmental data, which include, amongst others. Global
Positioning System (GPS) readings for each sample plot.
3. Mopaneveld is considered an event-driven system
(Du Plessis 2001 ) and is characterized by highly dynam-
ic, unstable vegetation states. Vegetation classification of
such systems is intricate due to temporal and spatial rela-
tionships between communities. This dynamic character
of Mopaneveld vegetation, especially in the field layer,
causes a major constraint in phytosociological syntheses
in that plant communities are irregularly separated or
combined by TWINSPAN procedures. Plant community
descriptions are therefore not accurate and it is suggest-
ed that plant community descriptions in semi-arid
regions should focus only on perennial herbaceous and
woody species rather than a total floristic composition.
4. Although the objectives of this study were to iden-
tify major vegetation types, too little variation could be
derived from TWINSPAN classification on the regional
scale. It therefore became evident that detailed phytoso-
ciological syntheses should also be undertaken on a local
scale. For instance, Becker & JUrgens (2000) identified a
total of four major vegetation units along a decreasing
moisture gradient in Kaokoland. This kind of variance is
easily overlooked on a regional scale.
5. Differences in mean annual rainfall appears to be one of
the major driving forces on a regional scale, but on a local
scale soil character plays an important role. The Zimbabwean
vegetation type was separated into two major communities
based on soil and topography. In the Namibian Mopaneveld,
the Boscia foetida-Colophospermum mopane Vegetation
Type, as well as the Baiihinia petersiana-CoIophospenniirn
mopane Vegetation Type, was subdivided into two major
types based on soil type. The Eragrostis viscosa-Colopho-
spennum mopane Major Community, Type 6.1, occurs on
clayey soil with a thin sand deposit, whereas the Leuco-
sphaera bainesii-Colophospermiini mopane Major Com-
munity, Type 6.2, is characterized by calcareous substrates.
Although the South African Lowveld Mopaneveld was not
separated during the classification of the entire data set, sepa-
rate classification procedures revealed distinct major plant
communities according to soil type (Du Plessis 2001).
6. Vegetation types represent broad units with some
variation in environmental conditions, which therefore
constitute different habitats, with different plant communi-
ties of lower rank. Certain species are confined to these
plant communities (habitats), though will not have any
influence on a synoptic table, as these communities are all
consolidated into the single synreleve. Such species of lim-
ited distribution often have low frequency values and may
not be included in the synoptic table. The vegetation types
may therefore be floristically and environmentally much
more diverse than indicated by the table and descriptions.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the limitations associated with a phytosocio-
logical synthesis, this classification and description re-
vealed a discernible difference between Mopaneveld
vegetation of South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe.
Although Mopaneveld vegetation varies between differ-
ent geographical regions, there is a relationship between
Zimbabwean and South African Mopaneveld. The
Namibian Mopaneveld displays few relationships with
the eastern Mopaneveld, although the dynamics of the
herbaceous layer in Mopaneveld vegetation may induce
temporal shifts in plant communities towards spatial
134
Bothalia33,l (2003)
affinities. Species richness in Mopaneveld is therefore a
weak indication of species diversity due to the dynamic
shifts in the field layer. This study makes Mopaneveld
floristically and on plant community levels far more
extensive than was previously thought.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our appreciation to all the researchers who made their
data available for this project, although in some cases the
data have not been published. Mr Ben Strbhbach from the
National Botanical Research Institute in Windhoek, Namibia
is gratefully acknowledged for his valuable input and assis-
tance with field work in Namibia. Mr Jacques Gerber is
thanked for proofreading the manuscript. The National
Research Foundation and the University of Pretoria funded
this research project. An anonymous reviewer provided con-
structive comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.RH. 1953. Veld types of South Africa, edn 1. Memoirs of
the Botanical Sun’cy of South Africa No. 28: 1-192.
BECK, N.D. 1998. A wildlife management plan involving ecological
studies of plant communities and animal populations for Foskor
mine, Phalahorwa. B. Sc. (Hons.) project, University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
BECKER, T. & JURGENS, N. 2000. Vegetation along climate gradients in
Kaokoland, North-West Namibia. Phytocoenologia 30: 543-565.
BIGGS, R.C. 1979. The ecology of Chief ’s Island and the adjacent
floodplains of the Okavango Delta, Bot.swana. M.Sc. thesis.
University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
BREDENKAMP, G.J. & DEUTSCHLANDER, M.S. 1995. New azonal
syntaxa from the hills and river banks of the Manyeleti Game
Reserve, Northern Transvaal Province, South Africa. Koedoe 38:
41-58.
COLE, M.M. 1986. The savannas: hiogeography and geobotany. Aca-
demic Press, London.
DEKKER, B. & VAN ROOYEN. N. 1995. The physical environment
and plant communities of the Messina Experimental Farm.
South African Journal of Botany 61: 158-167.
DU PLESSIS, F. 2001. A phyto.wciological synthesis of Mopaneveld.
M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
GERTENBACH, W.P.D. 1980. Rainfall patterns in the Kruger National
Park. Koedoe 26: 9-121.
GERTENBACH, W.P.D. 1987. n Ekologie.se studie van die siiidelikste
Mopanieveld in die Nasionale Kriigerwildtuin. D.Sc. thesis.
University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
GIESS, W. 1998. A preliminary vegetation map of Namibia. Dinteria
4: 5-112.
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996a. TURBOVEG: software package for input,
processing and presentation of phytosociological data. IBN-
DLO, Wageningen, University of Lancaster.
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996b. MEGATAB: a visual editor for phytosocio-
logical tables. Giesen & Geurts, Ulft.
HILL, M.O. 1979a. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classifica-
tion of individuals and attributes. Cornell LIniversity, Ithaca,
New York.
HILL, M.O. 1979b. DECORANA: a FORTRAN program for detrended
correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell Uni-
versity, Ithaca, New York.
HIN. C.J. 2000. A natural resource inventory of San go Ranch, Save
Valley Consemmcy, Zimbabwe. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
LE ROUX, C..I.G. 1980. Vegetation classification and related studies
in the Etoshu National Park. D.Sc. thesis. University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
LE ROUX, C.J.G., GRUNOW. J.O., MORRIS, J.W., BREDENKAMP,
G.J. & SCHEEPERS, J.C. 1988. A classification of the vegeta-
tion of the Etosha National Park. South African Journal of Botany
54: 1-10.
LOUW, A.J. 1970. 'n Ekologiese studie van die Mopanie-veld noord
van die Soutpansberg. D.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
LOW. A.B. & REBELO, A.G. (eds). 1996. Vegetation of South Africa,
Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs
& Tourism. Pretoria.
MADAMS, R.W. 1990. The hiogeography of Colophospermum mo-
pane (Kirk ex Benth.j Kirk ex J. Leonard at its distribution limits
in eastern Botswana. Ph.D. thesis. University of London, UK.
MAPAURE, I. 1994. The distribution of mopane. Kirkia 15: 1-5.
MENDELSOHN. J. & ROBERTS, C. 1997. An environmental profile
and atlas of Caprivi. Environmental Profiles project. Directo-
rate of Environmental Affairs, Namibia.
O’CONNOR. T.G. 1992. Woody vegetation — environment relations in
a semi-arid savanna in the northern Transvaal. South African
Journal of Botany 58: 268-274.
O’CONNOR, T.G. 1999. Impact of sustained drought on a semi-arid
Colophospermum mopane savanna. African Journal of Range
and Forage Science 15: 83-91.
O’CONNOR, T.G. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1986. Classification and
condition of the vegetation types of the Nyahungwe area on the
Liindi River, Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. South Afiican
Journal of Botany 52: 117-123.
OELOFSE, J., BROCKETT, B.H.. BIGGS. H.C, & EBERSOHN, C.
2000. The effect of drought and post-fire grazing on the herba-
ceous layer of shrub-mopane veld on basalt in the Kruger
National Park, South Africa. Si.xth International Rangeland
Congress Proceedings 1 : 505-507.
TIMBERLAKE, J.R. 1995. Colophospermum mopane: annotated biblio-
graphy and review. The Zimbabwean Bulletin of Forestiy Research
11: 1-19.
TIMBERLAKE, J.R. 1999. Colophospermum mopane: an overview of
current knowledge. In J.R. Timberlake & S. Kativu, African plants:
biodiversity, taxonomy and uses: 565-571. Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew.
TIMBERLAKE, J.R.. NOBANDA, N. & MAPAURE, I. 1993, Vegeta-
tion survey of the communal land.s — north and west Zimbabwe.
Kirkia 14: 171-270.
VAN ROOYEN, N. 1978. 'n Ekologiese studie van die plantgemeen-
skappe van die Punda Milia-Pafuri-Wamhiyagehied in die
Nasionale Kriigerwildtuin. M.Sc. thesis. University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
VAN ROOYEN, N. 1981. A IJoristic description and structural analy-
sis of the plant communities of the Punda Milia-Pafuri-
Wambiya area in the Kruger National Park, Republic of South
Africa: 3. The Colophospermum mopane communities. Journal
of South African Botany 47: 585-626.
VAN ROOYEN, N. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. 1998. Mopane Shrub-
veld, Mopane Bushveld. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo, Vegeta-
tion of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: 9, 10. Department
of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
VISSER, N., VAN HOVEN, W. & THERON, G.K. 1996. The vegeta-
tion of the Honnel Nature Reserve, Northern Province, South
Africa, Koedoe 39: 25—42,
WERGER, M.J.A. & COETZEE, B.J. 1978. The Sudano-Zambezian
Region. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of south-
ern Africa: 301-462. Junk, The Hague.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa, a descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of
Africa. Natural Resources Re.search 20: 1-356.
WILD, H., & BARBOSA, L.A.G. 1967. Supplement of the vegetation
map of the Flora zambesiaca area. In H. Wild & A, Fernandes,
Vegetation map of the Flora zambesiaca region. Harare, Zimbabwe.
WINTERBACH, R., BREDENKAMP, G.J., DEUTSCHLANDER, M.S.
& MUCINA, L. 2000. Preliminary syntaxonomic scheme of veg-
etation classes for (he Central Bushveld of South Africa. In PS,
While, L, Mucina, J.S. Leps & E. van dec Maarel, Proceedings
lAVS Symposium: 123-147. Opulus Press. Uppsala.
Bothalia33.1; 135-137(2003)
Miscellaneous notes
HYACINTHACEAE
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 19. NEW CHROMOSOME COUNTS FOR THREE DRIMIOPSIS TAXA
Drimiopsis Lindl. & Paxton is a small genus of ± fif-
teen species, confined to Africa south of the Sahara,
excluding the rain forests (Stedje 1994; Kativu 2000). Of
the seven species included in the Flora of tropical Africa
(Baker 1898), four were made synonyms by Stedje &
Thulin (1995). The five southern Africa species (Arnold
& De Wet 1993) have increased to nine in the most
recent revision, one of which is divided into two sub-
species (Muller-Doblies & Muller-Doblies 1997).
The plants have small white bulbs with loose, fleshy
scales, the leaves are often spotted and the inflorescence
is axillary, fleshy and mostly erect. The perianth seg-
ments are cucculate and connivent with free deltoid fila-
ments attached basally and their colour ranges from
green or white to pale pink. The gynoecium is sessile and
globose with two basal ovules.
Speta (1998) places Drimiopsis in the subfamily
Hyacinthoideae Link, where it is included in the tribe
Massonieae Baker which Jessop (1975) distinguishes on
the occurrence of spotted leaves, as well as seeds without
a superficial cellular pattern. Based on, amongst others,
the occurrence of two basal seeds in each locule, leaves
without sheathing cataphylls and several inflorescences
to a tuft of leaves, Muller-Doblies & Muller-Doblies
(1997) recently placed Drimiopsis with Resnova Van der
Merwe and Ledehouria Roth in the subtribe Ledebourii-
nae U. Muller-Doblies & D. Muller-Doblies.
Chromosome morphology and number has previously
been used to infer evolutionary relationships within the
Liliaceae sensu lato (De Wet 1957; Jessop 1972; Gibbs
1974; Sen 1975; Speta 1979; Stedje & Nordal 1987).
Chromosome numbers published for Drimiopsis to date
(Table 1 ) represent counts for only one-third of the genus.
Matsuura & Sato (1935) published a somatic chromo-
some number of 80 for D. botryoides Baker subsp. botry-
oides and Sato (1942) a number of 64 for D. maculata
Lindl. & Paxton, thus suggesting x = 8 (Darlington &
Wylie 1956). Hybridization and allopolyploidy may have
produced polyploids with x = 6, 7, 8 & 9 leading to n =
11 & 13 (De Wet 1957; Mahalakshima & Sheriff 1970).
De Wet (1957) proposed that the chromosome counts
in Drimiopsis arose from x = 5, as is found in the tribe
Scilleae sensu Baker. Mahalakshima & Sheriff (1970)
reported gametic numbers of 32, 33 and 34, but they
observed several univalents and multivalents as well as
bivalents in rings and chains during diakinesis, which
may explain their n = 32, 33 and 34. The 22nl6iof the
gametic chromosomes, 2n = 60 (Table 1), might also
TABLE 1 . — Chromosome numbers in Drimiopsis Lindl. & Paxton. Asterisk indicates chromosome numbers derived from
the present investigation. Taxa are listed alphabetically within each major geographical region
Taxon n 2n Source
Tropical Africa
barteri Baker
botryoides Baker
subsp. botryoides
subsp. prostata Stedje
kirkii Baker
volkensii (Engl.) Baker
Southern Africa
burkei Baker
subsp. burkei
subsp. stolonissima U. Muller-Doblies & D. Muller-Doblies
crenata Van der Merwe
maculata Lindl. & Paxton
maxima Baker
pusilla U. Muller-Doblies & D. Muller-Doblies
saundersiae Baker
136
Bothalia33,l (2003)
suggest two different genomes of uncertain origin
(Fernandes & Neves 1962). Variation in chromosome
numbers listed in Table 1, suggests basic chromosome
numbers of 8, 10 & 11.
The objective of this study is to determine the chro-
mosome numbers of three Drimiopsis taxa, i.e. D. hurkei
Baker subsp. hurkei, D. hurkei Baker subsp. stolonissima
U.Miiller-Doblies & D.Miiller-Doblies and D. piisilla
U.Muller-Doblies & D.Muller-Doblies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The following plant material was collected in the field
and cultivated in the glasshouse in the Potchefstroom
University Botanical Garden:
1 . Drimiopsis hurkei subsp. hurkei. North-West. — 2627
(Potchefstroom): hill in Potchefstroom University Botanical
Garden, (-CA), Lehatha 009 (PUC).
2. Drimiopsis hurkei subsp. stolonissima. Limpopo. —
2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Strydom Tunnel, (-BC), Lehatha
037 (PUC).
3. Drimiopsis pusilla. Swaziland. — 2631 (Mbabane): 4 km
from Mbabane on the Usutu Road, (-BD), Lehatha 078
(PUC).
Fresh root tips were harvested from bulbs from
8:00-1 1 :30 a.m. The root tips were placed in water at 4°C
in a refrigerator for 24 hours to stop cell activity (Kleyn-
hans & Spies 1999). The root tips were then hydrolysed in
hot (60°C) IN HCl for 10 minutes, then stained with leuco
basic fuchsin at 4°C in the dark for 24 hours. Stained root
tips were then squashed in aceto-orcein and left to stain for
20 minutes (Darlington & LaCour 1976; Kleynhans &
Spies 1999). Meanwhile, coverslips were prepared with
Mayer’s albumin and placed on the squashes. The slides
were then placed between three filter papers folded in half,
then squashed.
The slides were made permanent using the float-off
method in 45% acetic acid, dehydration in a series of alcohol,
and mounting in Euparal (Darlington & LaCour 1976).
RESULTS
Drimiopsis hurkei subsp. hurkei possesses a somatic
chromosome number of 44 (Figure lA). The chromo-
somes are large and mostly telocentric. Asymmetry of
the karyotype is evident. The larger chromosome pairs
are up to five times larger than the smallest.
The somatic chromosome count of Drimiopsis hurkei
subsp. stolonissima is 40 (Figure IB). The larger chro-
mosome pairs are three times larger than the smaller ones.
The somatic chromosome count of Drimiopsis pusilla
is 44. The telocentric chromosomes are comparatively
smaller (Figure 1C) than those of D. hurkei subsp. hurkei
and D. hurkei subsp. stolonissima (Figure lA, B).
DISCUSSION
Two basic chromosome numbers exist in the Drimi-
opsis taxa investigated, i.e. x = 1 1 for D. hurkei subsp.
hurkei and D. pusilla, and x = 10 for D. hurkei subsp.
stolonissima. This data, combined with recently pub-
lished data (Stedje & Nordal 1987; Stedje 1994), sug-
gests that the majority of Drimiopsis species appear to
have a basic chromosome number of x = 11 (Table 1).
Tetrapolyploids are common but pentaploids and hexa-
ploids seem confined to tropical Africa.
The somatic chromosome numbers reported for
Drimiopsis hotryoides subsp. hotryoides, 2n = 80
(Matsuura & Sato 1935) and D. maculata, 2n = 64 (Sato
1942), suggesting x = 8, are the only ones with this kary-
otype known so far in this group.
Chromosome counts of Drimiopsis crenata Van der
Merwe and D. saundersiae Baker, 2n = 20 (De Wet
1957); D. maculata, n = 15 (Jessop 1972) (Table 1),
together with the latest results (D. hurkei subsp. stolonis-
sima, 2n = 40) support x = 10. D. crenata and D. saun-
dersiae were placed in synonymy under D. hurkei subsp.
hurkei (Jessop 1972), 2n = 44. D. volkensii (Engl.)
Baker, 2n = 64 (Gill 1978) and D. kirkii Baker, 2n = 60
(Eernandes & Neves 1962; Vij etal. 1982), n = 30 (Vijaya-
valli & Mathew 1988, 1990) and 2n = 68 (Mahalakshima
r
V
i *>>'** '^ St
i
-W'
'V'l w .
«t
4^
FIGURE I . — .Somatic (2n) chromosome luimhers of lliree Diimio/J.si.s taxa: A, I). hurkei Baker subsp. hurkei, Lehatiui 009, somatic chromosome
number = 44; B, D. hurkei Baker subsp. stoiouis.siuw U.Muller-Doblies & D.Miiller-Doblies, Lehatiui 037, somatic ehromo.some number
= 40; C. t). pu.siiiu U.Muller-Doblies & D.Muller-Doblies, Lehatiui 078, somatic chromosome number = 44. Scale bar; A-C, 60 pm.
Bothalia 33.1 (2003)
137
& Sheriff 1970), are synonyms of D. botryoides subsp.
botr\oides (Stedje 1994) with 2n = 80 (Matsuura & Sato
1935), 2n = 44, 55 (Stedje & Nordal 1987; Stedje 1994)
and 66 (Stedje 1994).
Because the counting of large chromosome numbers
can be tricky, some of the aforementioned synonyms and
chromosome counts need re-evaluation: present and pre-
vious karyological studies, for example, do not support
the synonymy of Drimiopsis crenata and D. saundersiae,
X = 10, under D. burkei subsp. biirkei, x = 1 1. D. crenata
and D. saundersiae instead share the same basic number
with D. burkei subsp. stolonissima. Chromosome num-
bers of D. kirkii. x = 10, and D. volkensii, 2n = 64 also
cast doubts on their synonymy with D. botryoides subsp.
botryoides, x = 11. Yet. aneuploid series are known to
exist and could account for the above observations.
The present study confirms that Drimiopsis possesses
a basic chromosome number of at least x = 10 or 11, the
former being a character state predominant in southern
African taxa and the latter is predominant in tropical
African taxa. Higher chromosome numbers in the 60s
and 80s, appear to be confined to tropical Africa (Table
1 ). The southern African taxa are to date, diploids or
tetraploids.
Additional chromosome counts are needed not only to
verify published data but also to clarify issues raised in
this paper. In particular, attention needs to be given to the
case of D. barteri Baker 2n = 24 (Oyewole 1988), sug-
gesting X = 12.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of Adre Minnar of the Department of
Plant Sciences: Genetics, University of the Free State, is
gratefully acknowledged. The Botswana College of
Agriculture sponsors this project.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD. T.H. & DE WET. B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa: names
and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 62.
BAKER, J.G. 1898. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thieselton-Dyer. Flora of tropical
Africa 7: 421-568.
DARLINGTON. C.D. & LACOUR. L.F. 1976. The handling of chromo-
somes. edn 6. Allen & Unwin, London.
DARLINGTON. C.D. & WYLIE, A.P. 1956. Chromosome atlas of flower-
ing plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
DE WET. J.M.J. 1957. Chromosome numbers in the Scilleae. Cytologia
22: 145-149.
FERNANDES. A. & NEVES, J.B. 1962. Sur la caryologie de quelques
monocotyledons Africaines. Rend de la IV Reunion pienier da
i' Association pour T Etude Ta.xonomicpie de la flore d'Afrique
Tropicale: 439^63. Lisbon.
GIBBS, D.R. 1974. Chemota.xonomy of flowering plants, vols 1^. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
GILL, L.S. 1978. Chromosome numbers of angiosperms in Tanzania II.
Adansonia 18: 19-24.
JESSOP. J.P 1972. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 3.
Drimiopsis and Resnova. Journal of South African Botany 38:
151-162.
JESSOP, J.P. 1975. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 5.
Seed surface characters and generic groupings. Journal of South
African Botany 41: 67-85.
KATIVU, S. 2000. Notes on the genus Drimiopsis Lindl. (Hyacinth-
aceae) of the Flora zamhesiaca area. Kirkia 17: 150-152.
KLEYNHANS. R. & SPIES, J.J. 1999. Chromosome number and mor-
phological variation in Lachenalia bidhifera (Hyacinthaceae).
South A frican Journal of Botany 65: 357-360.
KOOTIN-SANWU, M. 1969. In lOPB chromosome number reports XXII.
Taxon 18: 433^42.
MAHALAKSHMI, N. & SHERIFF, A. 1970. Karyomorphology of Drimi-
opsis kirkii Baker. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences,
vol. LXXII: 270-276.
MATSUURA, N. & SATO, T. 1935. Contributions to the idiogram study in
phanerogamous plants. Japanese Journal of Science 5: 33-75.
MULLER-DOBLIES. U. & MULLER-DOBLIES. D. 1997. Partial revi-
sion of the Tribe Massonieae (Hyacinthaceae). Feddes Repertorium
108: 49-96.
OYEWOLE, S.O. 1998. Chromosome counts and karyomorphology of
some West tropical African Scilleae (Liliaceae). Annuls of Missouri
Botanical Gardens 15'. 196-202.
SATO, D. 1942. Karyotype alterations and phylogeny in Liliaceae and
allied families. Japanese Journal of Botany 12: 57-161.
SEN. S. 1975. Cytotaxonomy of Liliales. Feddes Repertorium 86:
255-305.
SHARMA, A.K. 1970. Annual Report 1967-1968. Research Bulletin of
the University of Calcutta (Cytogenetics lab) 2: 1-50.
SPETA, F. 1979. Karyological investigations in Scilla in regard to their
importance for taxonomy. Webbia 34: 419-431.
SPETA, F. 1998. Hyacinthaceae. In K. Kubitzki, The families and gen-
era of vascular plants 3: 261-285. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
STEDJE, B. 1994. A revision of the genus Drimiopsis (Hyacinthaceae)
in Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 14: 45-50.
STEDJE, B. & NORDAL, I. 1987. Cytogeographical studies of Hyacinth-
aceae in Africa south of the Sahara. Nordic Journal of Botany
7: 53-65.
STEDJE, B. & THULIN, M. 1995, Synopsis of the Hyacinthaceae in tropi-
cal East and northeast Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 1 5 : 59 1 -60 1 .
VIJ, S.P., SHARMA, M. & CHAUDHARY, J.D. 1982. Cytogenetical in-
vestigations into some garden ornamentals III: chromosomes in
some monocot taxa, Cytologia 47: 649-663.
VIJAYAVALLL B. & MATHEW, PM. 1988. Studies of south Indian
Liliaceae II: cytology of species of four genera of the tribe
Scilleae. New Botanist 15: 61-68.
VIJAYAVALLL B. & MATHEW, PM. 1990, Cytotaxonomy of the Lili-
aceae and allied families. Continental Publishers. Kerala, India.
P.D. LEBATHA*f J.J. SPIES** and M.H. BUYS*
* A.P. Goossens Herbarium. School for Environmental Sciences and
Development: Botany, Potchefstroom University for CHE, 2520 Potchef-
stroom.
'Corresponding author, e-mail: plbpdl(§>puknet.puk.ac.za
** Department of Plant Sciences: Genetics, University of the Free State,
PO. Box 339. 9300 Bloemfontein.
MS. received: 2002-08-13.
■" V f ■*
1
•’.f. :■■*::.> 4mm
mi
liV
Vif
■' i»-s,Vki.u ' .'WWft-it..,.-.
T® Vt. ■ m ■|.‘.1»>^:'. ff, ,,
qnH'S'i ' «,!; •; !
-„H,- '•.^■.•■■VH,.vU"'
iskt.ili' .. ./' r . «><i 1 . w. I Ai ji '«.. J>;i>lte«^'i«l!it'i^»( . ^
fc>^
_,-t Sni -„ii.»t
'>’^^v* ,^V it I"
§ ?K. :- 'w*/ '''■
1 T )«>' r ‘^''Yffr *' t . ^' ■ ■,.f>f'- r' fi, r .
„ ^ ^ ^ ■«- a . . y.-*...
r {)5^ iiii^: i,?' ' i ' .4
•1! 5fif , »; ■•««#'-'^;‘'i|tt#i:MF-^v*^ ••■*. - ,\l
■;■ , ^ :k . iJin... *. . .a-. -n
'*.': j«Mippw-
■i i/' «/ -
^■ ' 'ij
»$**
T.
'^i'> -~ . ,
.'. ‘ >f' " •
■.I.:"' :/ ;^^.; (
-
ij,
;'C;''3S;r'St?|':'
(tilt t
m 'f!
!,'.*' ''ll
.' » »
.V .!
■\ w
^ . 'if WjmfSJltL .' ,'. '5 ■■'<>
^ » r* . i- VfsPftifltJ ■• < m^.-v-'-.. ■' • W{*'‘ - S
Bothalia 33,1: 139-140(2003)
Book Reviews
WORLD CHECKLIST AND BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SAPOTACEAE,
by RAFAEL GOVAERTS, DAVID G. FRODIN & TERENCE D. PEN-
NINGTON (assisted by L.W. Jessup & W. Vink). 2001. Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK. Pp. xi + 361, format
295 X 200 mm. Soft cover: ISBN 1-900347-94-6, price £57.50,
This publication is the fifth in the series World checklist and biblio-
graphy, the previous numbers dealing with Magnoliaceae (1996),
Fagales (1998), Coniferae (1998. 2nd edn 2001) and Euphorbiaceae
(with Pandaceae) (2001 ).
The purpose of this work is to present a checklist of species and
infraspecific taxa with synonyms of the family Sapotaceae, as well as
places of publication, distribution and habit. At least one bibliographic
reference is given for every accepted genus, with a total of 228 refer-
ences. The introduction features a table presenting the 54 genera
accepted in this work, as well as the number of species in every genus,
revision dates and notes on the persons involved in the revision of the
genera.
Five tribes are recognized: Mimosopeae (with 17 genera in three
subtribes, represented in Africa), Isonandrae (with seven genera, not
represented in Africa), Sideroxylae (with six genera, well represented
in Africa and Madagascar), Chrysophyllae (with 19 genera, less well
represented in Africa and Madagascar) and Omphalocarpeae (four gen-
era. in W Africa, Madagascar and New Guinea). The authors suggest
that Omphalocarpeae is not a 'natural' one. Genera are arranged alpha-
betically. Under each genus, notes and where possible, its relationships
with other genera, are given, but without full descriptions, which might
fall outside the scope of this work. Descriptions for the genera of
Sapotaceae on a broad scale were dealt with by Pennington (1991),
whereas those for southern African genera were done by Bredenkamp
(2000). This work deals with 1 180 accepted or provisionally accepted
species and 3 689 synonyms below generic rank. In most cases genera
are represented by a plate from the Kew Illustrations Collection. Most
plates are well reproduced and give a good impression of the facies of
selected species. However, some are disappointing, for example the
Argania spinosa one with some ink blots (p. 31 ) and Sarcosperma pan-
iculatum with some critical lines faint or missing (p. 288). The conclu-
sion of the work is devoted to insufficiently known or doubtful taxa and
contains a long list of excluded taxa, which reminds us, as David
Frodin says in the preface, that much remains to be done.
The Sapotaceae is well represented in the tropics and the generic
delimitations of the family have endured many changes over the last 40
years or so, and one now hopes to see more taxonomic and nomenclat-
ural stability in this family. This work encourages researchers to work
more on a monographic scale, for example in Africa, for which no over-
all continent-wide treatment has been published since Engler (1904),
although various regional floras have appeared: Flore dii Gabon
Aubreville ( 1961 ); Flora of southern Africa Meeuse ( 1963); Flora of
West tropical Africa Heine (1963); Flore dii Canieroun Aubreville
(1964); Flora of tropical East Africa Hemsley (1968); and Flora
zambesiaca Kupicha (1983).
Furthermore, the work is a very valuable resource for obtaining
information on the Sapotaceae on a worldwide basis and is therefore, a
welcome reference book for researchers. It also has its uses for the
herbarium worker and although the genera are arranged alphabetically,
relationships between genera are usually mentioned. An interesting
species. Pradosia spinosa, the first African species of this American
genus, described by Ewango & Breteler in 2001, is not included in this
work — it might have been too late for this publication! However, it is a
recommendable and valuable piece of work. Congratulations to the
authors!
REFERENCES
AUBREVILLE, A. 1961. Sapotaceae. Flore du Gabon 1. Museum National
d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris.
AUBREVILLE. A. 1964, Sapotaceae. Flore du Canieroun 2. Museum
National d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 2000. Sapotaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants
of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 506-508.
ENGLER, A. 1904. Sapotaceae. Monographien afrikanischer Pflanzen-
Familien und Gattungen 8. Engelmann, Leipzig.
EWANGO, C.E.N. & BRETELER, F.J. 2001. Presence du genre Pradosia
(Sapotaceae) en Afrique: description d'une nouvelle esptee, P. spi-
nosa. Adansonia 23: 147-150.
HEINE, H. 1963. Sapotaceae. In J. Hutchinson & J.M. Dalziel, Flora
of West tropical Africa, edn 2, vol. 2. Crown Agents for Oversea
Governments and Administrations, London.
HEMSLEY, J.H. 1968. Sapotaceae. In E. Milne-Redhead & R.M. Polhill,
Flora of tropical East Africa, Sapotaceae. Crown Agents for
Oversea Governments and Administrations, London.
KUPICHA, F.K. 1983. Sapotaceae. Flora zambesiaca 7,1: 210-247.
MEEUSE, A.D.J. 1963. Sapotaceae. Flora of southern Africa 26: 31-53.
PENNINGTON, TD. 1991. The genera of Sapotaceae . Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew and New York Botanical Garden.
M. JORDAAN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
CLIVIAS. by HAROLD KOOPOWITZ. 2002. Timber Press, The Hasel-
tine Bldg, 133 SW Second Ave, Suite 450, Portland, Oregon 97204-3527,
USA. Pp. 384. Hard cover: ISBN 0-88192-546-2, price US$ 34.95.
This horticultural account of the southern African genus Clivia
(Amaryllidaceae) discusses the four species known at the time of writ-
ing (a fifth was added in 2002), as well as recording the innumerable
cultivars now available, mostly of C. miniata. The three species of
Cryptostephanus, the apparent sister genus to Clivia, are discussed. The
text is illustrated by 107 colour photographs, mostly by James
Comstock, eight reproductions of colour illustrations from old botanical
works and one black-and-white reproduction of an engraving.
The author, himself an ex-South African, is professor of ecology at
the University of California, Irvine and a part-time Clivia grower. He
has authored or co-authored a number of books and articles on a diver-
sity of plant-related subjects. In gathering information for the present
book he travelled widely in South Africa and other major centres of
Clivia cultivation. The talented photographer. James Comstock, also
based in California, is a noted Clivia breeder in his own right.
A subtitle for this enjoyable book could be 'All you ever wanted to
know about the art and science of growing and hybridizing clivias’. It
is as much about the people [the term 'cliviophile' coined in Meerow’s
(2001 ) review is an apt one] as about the plants, and written in a humorous
style that is a curious mixture of anecdote and serious information.
While the content may be slightly muddled (topics discussed in previous
chapters are revisited several times) the only serious fault I noted is that
the terms 'floret' and 'flower' are used interchangeably. In Clivia the
flower is certainly large and conspicuous enough to be called a flower!
The confusing horticultural taxonomic nomenclature (mentioned
below) is not of the author's making but it is nevertheless a serious
problem that is highlighted by him in the book.
The book begins with a Foreword by Sir Peter Smithers, pioneer
breeder of yellow Clivia. followed by Acknowledgements of all the
people who contributed their time and knowledge to the author, and
then a brief Introduction to the plants, attempting to explain their attrac-
tion (fine or unusual plants can fetch truly exorbitant prices!). This
aspect is discussed in more detail in Chapter 7.
Chapter 1 entitled 'What is in a name'?' describes in some detail the
discovery and naming of the genus and species. The principles behind
the application of scientific names are briefly mentioned. Common
names in various countries are given. The correct application of culti-
var names (extremely important for buyers and show judges) is dis-
140
Bothalia33,l (2003)
cussed in some detail. Chapter 2 entitled 'Clivia and Cryptostephanus:
the species' discusses the four Clivia species then known to science —
C. mirabiiis Rourke. a tubular-flowered species was subsequently
described in 2002 — and the three tropical African Ctyptostephanux
species. Keys to the species and brief plant and habitat descriptions are
included, with distributions. Chapter 3 entitled 'The biology of a Clivia
plant' is a general overview of this topic (how many growers ever think
about the function of leaves?). Ecology, conservation and indigenous
usage are topics briefly covered. Included here is an introduction to
landscaping uses (discussed in more detail in Chapter 4) and an intro-
duction to flower colour (discussed in more detail in Chapter 5).
Chapter 4 entitled 'Cultivating and growing clivias’ covers the
usual topics of soils, drainage, fertilizer, pests and so on but firstly
stresses the extreme importance of site selection. The final topic in this
chapter is humorously entitled 'Conversing with clivias’. meaning ulti-
mately, that it is important to examine the collection regularly and to
check for pests and diseases. Chapter 5 entitled ‘Understanding Clivia
colours' explains the complexities of flower and fruit pigment and their
heritability in greater detail. It is indeed a complex situation! It seems
to be more by accident than design that breeders have produced yel-
lows, deeper orange to red shades, and pastel peach to apricot colours
from the wild-type Clivia miniata with its clear orange tepals. The
search for new colours is ongoing. Chapter 6 entitled 'Hybridizing and
growing clivias from seed’ discusses the rationale behind the work and
the methodology, stressing the importance of adequate record-keeping.
Chapter 7 entitled 'Clivia obsession’ records the development of the
present-day obsession with clivias and describes some of the role-play-
ers.
The bulk of the text. Chapters 8 through 13, discusses the various
categories of the 'hybrids’, more correctly 'cultivars'. which are nor-
mally displayed at clivia shows. Chapter 8 entitled 'Standard Clivia
miniata hybrids; orange and red' lists the flower and plant criteria for
shows. A selection of named cultivars are described, many illustrated
by photographs. Likewise Chapter 9 entitled 'Standard Clivia miniata
hybrids: yellow’ and Chapter 10 entitled 'Standard Clivia miniata
hybrids: pastel colours’ describes and illustrates named cultivars in
these colour groups. Chapter 1 1 entitled 'Variegated Clivias’ discusses
the origin of variegation — this type is most popular in China and
Japan — and possible future trends in leaf coloration. Chapter 12 is enti-
tled 'Cyrtanthiflora-type clivias and related hybrids’ explains that tax-
onomically, the name Clivia cyrtanthiflora refers only to the interspe-
cific hybrid between C. miniata and C. nobilis, therefore in my view it
should be expressed as Clivia x cyrtanthiflora. Nomenclature of the
group of hybrids of C. miniata with the tubular-flowered species
appears to be very muddled due to lack of clear guidelines in the past,
in the naming of hybrids and back-crosses. Some of the named culti-
vars in this latter group are described and illustrated in this chapter.
Chapter 13 entitled 'Novelty clivias’ discusses firstly plants with freak
flowers, including keeled tepals. multi-tepals, doubles and so on,
describing and illustrating some named cultivars, and secondly plants
with unusual leaves, including dwarf forms.
The final chapter. Chapter 14 entitled 'The future’ discusses future
prospects for 'improvement’ in flower colour, shapes, sun-proofing (the
bright pigments are easily bleached by unfiltered sunlight), re-bloom-
ing characteristics, producing better peduncles on dwarf plants, pro-
ducing broad-leaved yellows and producing intergeneric hybrids. The
latter is a virtually unexplored avenue (attempts thus far have been
unsuccessful) for possibly introducing different flower colours
(Cryptostephanus, an apparent sister genus, with white to pink or dark
purple flowers, is described in Chapter 2). There are several new tech-
niques available which could be utilized to produce new plants for the
extremely competitive and lucrative nursery trade.
Three appendices round off the book. Appendix One entitled 'Who
was Lady Clive?’ should perhaps have been inserted into Chapter 1,
where the discovery and naming of the genus is detailed, and where an
engraving of Lady Clive is reproduced. The content of Appendix Two.
entitled 'Sources of information' and Appendix Three, entitled
'Sources of plants’ is self-evident. A glossary of terms is included, a
map of South Africa (at an extremely small scale), references and addi-
tional reading and finally an index of plant names in which pho-
tographs are. usefully, indicated in bold face.
As a long-time appreciative grower of 'unimproved' Clivia minia-
ta. I found the book informative. It also brought home to me the fact
that there is a vast unexploited genetic potential in our indigenous flora,
which is only now being tapped. The book is recommended as a refer-
ence for beginner 'cliviophiles' although it is on the expensive side for
South Africans.
REFERENCES
MEEROW. A.W. 2001. Review: Clivias. Herbertia 56: 149. 150.
ROURKE, J.P. 2002. Clivia mirabiiis (Amaryllidaceae: Haemantheae)
a new species from Northern Cape. South Africa. Bothalia 32:
1-7.
C. ARCHER*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria. South
Africa.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R1 80,00 Other countries US$36.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
SADC R350,00 Other countries US$70.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
Contents to vols 1-20
by H.F. Glen, B.A. Momberg & E. Potgieter (1991)
A brief history of Bothalia; a list of all papers published; a list of all authors, co-authors, keywords and titles; and tables with
publication dates, major subjects covered and some information on authors.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$3.00
Contents to vols 21-25
by B.A. Momberg & J.M. Mulvenna (1996)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and tides, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R15.00 / Other countries US$3.00
Contents to vols 26-30
by B.A. Momberg (2000)
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and tides, with reference to individual articles.
Price: SADC countries, R18.00 / Other countries US$3.60
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 • Fax. (012) 804-3211 • email: bookshop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za
BOTHALIA
Volume 33,1 May 2003
CONTENTS
1 . The genus Solanum (Solanaceae) in southern Africa: subgenus Leptostemonum, the introduced sections
Acanthophora and Torva. W.G. WELMAN 1
2. Studies in the genus Machairophyllum (Mesembryanthemaceae), with notes on some related genera.
H. KURZWEIL and P. CHESSELET 19
3. A new serotinous species of Cliffortia L. (Rosaceae) from Northern Cape, South Africa and section
Arboreae emended. A.C. EEEEINGHAM 41
4. A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 3. The reinstatement of L ensifolia, L. gal-
pinii and L. sandersonii. T.J. EDWARDS and S. VENTER 49
5. An annotated checklist of the pteridophyte flora of Swaziland. J.P. ROUX 53
6. Taxonomy of the genus Passerina (Thymelaeaceae). C.L. BREDENKAMP and A.E. VAN WYK .... 59
7. Studies in the liverwort family Aneuraceae (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 5. Riccardia amazonica.
S.M. PEROLD 99
8. Notes on African plants:
Apocynaceae. A new subspecies of Brachystelma from Eastern Cape, South Africa (Asclepia-
doideae-Ceropegieae). A.P DOED and PV. BRUYNS 105
Asteraceae. A new species of Philyrophyllum (Gnaphalieae) from Namibia. PPJ. HERMAN .... 118
Hyacinthaceae. A new species and new combinations in Drimia (Urgineoideae). J.C. MANNING
and P. GOLDBLATT 109
Hyacinthaceae. A new species of Ornithogalum from Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P. DOED
and S. A. HAMMER 112
Hyacinthaceae and Crassulaceae. Two new cremnophilous taxa from semi-arid regions in South
Africa. E.J. VAN JAARSVELD and A.E. VAN WYK 115
Lamiaceae. Tetradenia kaokoensis, a new species from Kaokoland, Namibia. E.J. VAN JAARS-
VELD and A.E. VAN WYK 107
Lamiaceae. The correct name for Salvia thermara. E.J. VAN JAARSVELD 112
9. A comparison of Mopaneveld vegetation in South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe. E. SJEBERT, G.J. BRE-
DENKAMP and S.J. SJEBERT 121
10. Miscellaneous notes:
Hyacinthaceae. Chromosome studies on African plants. 19. New chromosome counts for three
Drimiopsis taxa. P.D. LEBATHA, J.J. SPIES and M.H. BUYS 135
11. Book reviews 139
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Ahstracts/RRM • CABS • CAB ACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Current Contents, Scisearch, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: reviews and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XIOI, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Tel. (012) 804-3200. Fax (012)
804-3211. email: book.shop@nbipre.nbi.ac.za website: www.nbi.ac.za/pubs. Typesetting and page layout: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction: Prism
Graphix, P.O. Box 13712, 0028 Hatfield, Pretoria. Printing: Afri.scot Printers, P.O. Box 75353, Lynnwood Ridge, 0040 Pretoria. Tel (012) 349-2800/1.
Fax (012) 349-2802.