Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 41,2
Oct. 2011
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL
BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE (SANBI) PRETORIA
Obtainable from SANBI, Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001,
RSA. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on
request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first
Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South
Africa. This house journal of SANBI, Pretoria, is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered
are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of
the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Bothalia Contents: five booklets containing a list of authors
and titles, and an index to taxa and keywords: a) to vols 1-20
(1921-1990); b) to vols 21-25 (1991-1995); to vols 26-30
(1996-2000); d) to vols 31-37 (2001-2007); to vols 38^11
(2008-2011).
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FS7I)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South
Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia and Botswana. Contains
descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa,
keys to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited
specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological notes.
Project discontinued. See plan of FSA at back of book.
FSA contributions 1-19 appear in Bothalia :
1 : Aquifoliaceae. S. Andrews. 1994. Bothalia 24: 163-166.
2: Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae, 1029010 Chortolirion. G.F. Smith.
1995. Bothalia 25: 31-33.
3: Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae, 1028010 Poellnitzia. G.F. Smith
1995. Bothalia 25: 35, 36.
4: Agavaceae. G.F. Smith & M. Mossmer. 1996. Bothalia 26:
31-35.
5: Buxaceae. H.F. Glen. 1996. Bothalia 26: 37—40.
6: Orchidaceae: Holothrix. K.L. Immelman. 1996. Bothalia 26:
25^10.
7: Verbenaceae: Vitex. C.L. Bredenkamp & D.J. Botha. 1996.
Bothalia 26: 141-151.
8: Ceratophyllaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1997. Bothalia 27:
125-128.
9: Onagraceae. P. Goldblatt & PH. Raven. 1997. Bothalia 27:
149-165.
10: Trapaceae. B. Verdcourt. 1998. Bothalia 28: 1 1-14.
1 1 : Zingiberaceae. R.M. Smith. 1998. Bothalia 28: 35-39.
12: Plantaginaceae. H.F. Glen. 1998. Bothalia 28: 151-157.
13: Ulmaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1999. Bothalia 29: 239-247.
14: Cannabaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1999. Bothalia 29:
249-252.
15: Piperaceae. K.L. Immelman. 2000. Bothalia 30: 25-30.
16: Sphenocleaceae. W.G. Welman. 2000. Bothalia 30: 31-33.
17: C'asuarinaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 2000. Bothalia 30:
143-146.
18: Salicaceae 5'. str. M. Jordaan. 2005. Bothalia 35: 7-20.
19: Asteraceae: Anthemideae: Enmorphia. N. Swelankomo.
2011. Bothalia 4 1 : 277-282.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and
vegetation, replacing Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens. See list at
back of book.
• The Memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological
nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic
botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontin-
ued after No. 63.
• The Annals are a series devoted to the publication of mono-
graphs and major works on southern African flora. Published:
Vols 14-19 (earlier vols published as suppl. vols to the Jour-
nal of South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with
accompanying text. The plates are prepared mainly by the
artists at SANBI. Many botanical artists have contributed to the
series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian
Condy, Betty Connell, Stella Gower, Rosemary Holcroft,
Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire
Linder-Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased
to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora
of southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in
the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil
populations. Now available:
• Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidi-
um, 1983, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
• Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (exclud-
ing Dicroidiurn ), 1983, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
• Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower
Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Obtainable
from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 317, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
• Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stem-
ming the Sixth Extinction, 1999, by J.M. Anderson (ed. ).
• Heyday of the gymnosperms: systematics and biodiversity
of the Late Triassic Molteno fructifications, 2003, by J.M.
Anderson & H.M. Anderson. Strelitzia 15.
• Brief history of the gymnosperms: classification, biodiver-
sity, phytogeography and ecology, 2007, by J.M. Anderson,
H.M. Anderson & C.J. Cleal. Strelitzia 20.
• Molteno ferns: Late Triassic biodiversity in southern Africa,
2008, by H.M. Anderson & J.M. Anderson. Strelitzia 21.
SANBI BIODIVERSITY SERIES
A series of occasional reports on projects, technologies,
workshops, symposia and other activities inflated by or executed
in partnership with SANBI. See list at back of book.
With compliments from
hSANBIBooksh°P
at the National Herbarium Building. Pretoria
Tel: +27 12 843 5000 E-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org. za
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 41,2
Scientific Editors:
Technical
O.A. Leistner, G. Germishuizen
Editor: B.A. Momberg
SANBI
Biodiversity for Life
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
Oct. 2011
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
M.J.A. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Anderberg, Dr A. A. Botanical Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Archer, Mrs C. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Archer, Dr R. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Boatwright, Dr J.S. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Bredenkamp, Prof. G.J. Eco Agent, P.O. Box 25533, Monumentpark, 0105 Pretoria.
Browning, Dr J. Formerly: Natal University Herbarium, Private Bag X01, 3209 Scottsville, RSA.
Bruyns, Dr P. Department Mathematics, University of Cape Town, RSA.
Burgoyne, Ms P. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Burrows, J.E. Box 710, 1120 Lydenburg, RSA.
Chinnock, Dr R.J. State Herbarium of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Goldblatt, Dr P. Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA.
Grobler, Mrs A. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Hoare, D. David Hoare Consulting cc. Private Bag X025, Lynnwood Ridge, Pretoria, RSA.
Jacobsen, DrN. P.O. Box 671, 6560 Wilderness, RSA.
Koekemoer, Ms M. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Magee, Dr A.R. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Mannheimer, Dr C. P.O. Box 193, Windhoek, Namibia.
Manning, Dr J.C. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Meerow, Dr A.W. National Gennplasm Repository, Miami, USA.
Meve, Dr U. University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Muasya, Dr M. University of Cape Town, 7700 Rondebosch, Cape Town, RSA.
Nordenstam, Prof. R.B. Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oliver, Dr E.G.H. Department of Botany & Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, RSA.
Retief, Dr E. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Roux, Dr J.P. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Rutherford, Dr M.C. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Schrire, Dr B. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Schutte-Vlok, Dr A.L. Cape Nature, Private Bag X658, 6620 Oudtshoorn, RSA.
Smithies, Mrs S.J. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Snijman, Dr D. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Stewart, Dr G. New Zealand Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Thulin, Dr M.L. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Vlok, J. Regalis Environmental Services, P.O. Box 1512, Oudtshoorn, Western Cape, RSA.
Whitehouse, Dr C.M. The Royal Horticultural Society Garden, Wisley, Woking, Surrey, England, UK.
Williams, Dr N. Dept Resource Management & Geography, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria,
Australia.
Winter, P.J.D. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Date of publication of Bothalia 41,1 : 3 May 201 1 .
CONTENTS
Bothalia 41 ,2
1. Ornithoglossum pulchrum (Colchicaceae: Colchiceae), a new species from southern Namibia. D.A. SNIJ-
MAN, B. NORDENSTAM and C. MANNHEIMER 231
2. Maireana brevifolia (Chenopodiaceae: Camphorosmeae), a new naturalized alien plant species in South
Africa. L. MUCINA and D.A. SNIJMAN 235
3. Taxonomic revision of the genus Thereianthus (Iridaceae: Crocoideae). J.C. MANNING and P. GOLD-
BLATT 239
4. Romulea pilosa and R. quartzicola (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), two new species from the southern African
winter rainfall region, with nomenclatural corrections including new names for R. amoena , R. neg-
lecta and R. rosea var. reflexa. J.C. MANNING, P. GOLDBLATT and A.D. HARROWER 269
5. FSA contributions 19: Asteraceae: Anthemideae: Eumorphia. N. SWELANKOMO 277
6. Review of the genus Xenoscapa (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), including X grandiflora , a new species from
southern Namibia. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 283
7. Notes on African plants:
Aizoaceae. New combinations in Antimima and Octopoma (Ruschioideae). C. KLAK 292
Alliaceae. Micromorphology and cytology of Prototulbaghia siebertii, with notes on its taxonomic
significance. C.G. VOSA, S.J. SIEBERT and A.E. VAN WYK 311
Amaryllidaceae. Ammocharis deserticola (Amaryllideae), a new species from Namibia and a key
to species of the genus. D.A. SNIJMAN and H. KOLBERG 308
Apocynaceae (Asclepiadoideae-Ceropegieae). First records of Orbea cooperi in Gauteng and
Mpumalanga Provinces, FSA region. S.P. BESTER and S.M. BERRUTI 295
Asteraceae. Lachnospermum neglectum (Asteroideae: Gnaphalieae), a new and overlooked species
from the Worcester Valley, Western Cape. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 304
Asteraceae. Biyomorphe and Dolichothrix (Gnaphalieae-Relhaniinae): taxonomy and nomencla-
ture. M. KOEKEMOER 324
Cyperaceae. New names and new combinations in Cyperus for southern Africa. C. ARCHER and
P. GOETGHEBEUR 300
Fabaceae. A new species of Xiphotheca from the Western Cape, South Africa. A.L. SCHUTTE-
VLOK 298
Fabaceae. A new species of Rhvnchosia from the northern provinces of South Africa. G. GERMIS-
HUIZEN 319
Hyacinthaceae. Albuca gariepensis (Ornithogaloideae), a new species of A. subgen. Namibiogalum
from Gordonia, South Africa, and A. prasina transferred to Ornithogalum. J.C. MANNING
and P. GOLDBLATT 314
Hyacinthaceae. Ornithogalum lebaense transferred to Albuca. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLD-
BLATT 297
Iridaceae. Gladiolus diluvialis (Crocoideae), a replacement name for the illegitimate homonym
G. halophilus. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 324
Lycopodiophyta: Selaginellaceae. Selaginella nivea, a new lycophyte record for South Africa, with
notes on its habitat. A. W. KLOPPER and R.R. KLOPPER 321
Nyctaginaceae. Notes on Commicarpus in southern Africa, including a new record for Namibia.
M. STRUWIG, S.J. SIEBERT and E.S. KLAASSEN 289
Scrophulariaceae. Anticharis juncea, an overlooked record for South Africa, with notes on its type
localities and flower morphology. H.M. STEYN 301
Vitaceae. A new and an overlooked record of Cyphostemma in Angola. F. DE SOUSA, E. FIGUEIRE-
DO and G.F. SMITH 294
8. Phytosociological description of norite koppies in the Rustenburg area, North-West Province and refinement
of the distribution of the Norite Koppies Bushveld on the national vegetation classification map of
South Africa. A.J.H. LAMPRECHT, S.S. CILLIERS, A.R. GOTZE and M.J. DU TOIT 327
9. The extended occurrence of Maputaland Woody Grassland further south in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
S.J. SIEBERT, F. SIEBERT and M.J. DU TOIT 341
10. Floristic analysis of domestic gardens in the Tlokwe City Municipality, South Africa. C.S. LUBBE,
S.J. SIEBERT and S.S. CILLIERS 351
1 1 . Miscellaneous notes:
Tribute to Beverley Momberg, technical editor in the publications section of the South African
National Biodiversity Institute. G.F. SMITH 363
12. Obituary: Franz Sebastian Muller (1913-2010). G.F. SMITH and E. FIGUEIREDO 365
13. South African National Biodiversity Institute: publications 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010. Com-
piler: Y. STEENKAMP 369
14. Guide for authors to Bothalia 377
New combinations, names, sections, series, species and statuses in Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
Albuca gariepensis J.C. Manning & Goldblatt sp. nov., 315
Albuca lebaensis (Van Jaarsv.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , comb, nov., 297
Ammocharis deserticola Snijman & Kolberg, sp. nov., 308
Antimima paripetala (L. Bolus) Klak , comb. nov., 293
Bracteolatus J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , ser. nov., 254
Brevibracteae Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, sect, nov., 246
Cyperus atriceps (Kiik.) C. Archer & Goetgh ., comb. & stat. nov., 300
Cyperus austro-afrieanus C. Archer & Goetgh., nom. nov., 300
Cyperus decurvatus (C.B. Clarke) C. Archer & Goetgh., comb. & stat. nov., 300
Cyperus palmatus (Lye) C. Archer & Goetgh., comb. & stat. nov., 300
Cyperus uitenhagensis (Steud.) C. Archer & Goetgh., comb, nov., 301
Gladiolus diluvialis Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, nom. nov., 324
Lachnospermum neglectum Schltr. ex J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 304
Octopoma nanum (L. Bolus) Klak, comb, nov., 293
Ornithoglossum pulchrum Snijman, B.Nord. & Mannheimer, sp. nov., 231
Rhynchosia coddii Germish., sp. nov., 319
Romulea pilosa J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 269
Romulea quartzicola J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 272
Romulea rosea var. muirii (N.E.Br.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , comb, et stat. nov., 275
Thereianthus bulbiferus Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, sp. nov., 254
Thereianthus elandsmontanus Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, sp. nov., 263
Thereianthus intermedius J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, nom. et stat. nov., 247
Xenoscapa grandiflora Goldblatt & J.C. Manning, sp. nov., 284
Xiphotheca rosmarinifolia A.L.Schutte, sp. nov., 298
IV
Bothalia 41,2: 231-233 (2011)
Ornithoglossum pulchrum (Colchicaceae: Colchiceae), a new species
from southern Namibia
D.A. SNIJMAN*, B. NORDENSTAM** and C. MANNHEIMER***
Keywords: Colchicaceae, Colchiceae, new species, Ornithoglossum Salisb., southern Namibia, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
We describe a new species in the sub-Saharan genus Ornithoglossum Salisb. from southern Namibia. Ornithoglossum
pulchrum from near Aus, is remarkable in having bright to dark pink flowers, a feature previously unknown in the genus.
The perigone is almost concolorous apart from a contrasting, pale yellow nectary region, narrowly outlined with darker red,
near the base of each tepal. The undulate leaves together with the long filaments, which are nearly as long as the tepals,
suggest a relationship with O. undulatum, a widespread species in the western parts of southern Africa, and O. zeyheri from
Namaqualand and the northwestern Cape.
INTRODUCTION
Ornithoglossum Salisb. is a small, sub-Saharan genus
in the family Colchicaceae (Nordenstam 1998). All
but one of the eight species recognized by Nordenstam
(1982) are concentrated in the western half of southern
Africa, mostly in the winter rainfall region. Only O. vul-
gare B.Nord. is found in southern Africa’s eastern parts
and as far north as East Africa. Previously the genus was
placed in the tribe Iphigenieae (Buxbaum 1936), but in
a new classification, based on an analysis of molecular
data of the family, the genus now falls within the tribe
Colchiceae, together with Colchicum L., Gloriosa L.,
Hexacyrtis Dinter and Sandersonia Hook. (Vinnersten &
Manning 2007).
Considering its small size, the genus shows remark-
able diversity in floral morphology. The perianth is
actinomorphic or zygomorphic in form and coloured
cream to attractive yellow, green, brown or purple,
sometimes almost black, and often bicoloured. In spe-
cies such as Ornithoglossum undulatum Sweet, the
flowers are large, showy and sweetly scented, but in O.
parviflorum B.Nord. they are small, inconspicuous, dull
and unscented (Manning et al. 2002). Other variable fea-
tures are the shape of the nectaries on the basal part of
the tepals and the length and thickness of the filaments.
Several micromorphological differences in the pollen
and seeds also help to distinguish groups of species. All
the species are reported to be highly toxic to stock due to
their colchicine-type alkaloids, which accounts for their
common name ‘ slangkop ’ (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk
1962).
While collecting material for a photographic guide to
the wildflowers of the southern Namib, the third author
found an unusual population of Ornithoglossum near the
small town of Aus, Namibia, in which the flowers were
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Cape Town. E-mail: d.snijman@sanbi.org.za.
** Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE- 10405 Stock-
holm, Sweden.
*** P.O. Box 193, Windhoek, Namibia. E-mail: manfam@iafrica.com.
na.
MS. received: 2011-03-15.
deep pink to crimson and almost concolorous except for
a pale yellow patch towards the base of each tepal. Due
to their undulate leaves, the plants were initially thought
to be O. undulatum (Mannheimer et al. 2008), a spe-
cies that has been recorded previously from southern
Namibia (Nordenstam 1982). Subsequent examination
of these specimens, however, has revealed further dis-
tinguishing characters, which together with the unique
flower colour, justify the description of the plants as a
new species of Ornithoglossum.
Ornithoglossum pulchrum Snijman, B.Nord. &
Mannheimer , sp. nov.
Cormus ovoideus, brevilobus. Caulis simplex gracilis
ad ± 110 mm altus. Folia 4—7, lanceolata margine con-
spicue crispato-undulato. Racemus 3-10-florus ad 40-80
mm longus. Perianthium actinomorphum, segmen-
tis 27-32 x 4-5 mm, roseis vel rubineis, luteolis prope
basim. Nectarii margo simplex. Filamenta plerumque
longitudine tepala aequantia. Antherae 2.5 x 0.5 mm.
Styli ± 25 mm longi.
TYPE. — Namibia: 2616 (Aus): riverbed, western
extent of Aus town lands, 1 386 m, (-CA), 22 Jun. 2005,
C.A. Mannheimer CM2710 (WIND, holo.).
Glabrous, cormous herb. Corm ovoid, ± 45 x 30 mm,
shallowly bilobed at base with lobes directed down-
wards, interior firm, whitish; tunics leathery, dark brown,
extended into a slender neck up to 80 mm long, sheath-
ing subterranean portion of stem, inner tunics rust-col-
oured. Cataphyll apparently absent. Stem erect, simple,
subterranean part slender, up to ± 110 mm long, as long
as leafy aerial portion, terminated by a bracteate, race-
mose inflorescence. Leaves alternate, 4-7, lanceolate
from sheathing base, recurved, 10-180 x 8-15 mm.
broadest at base, tapering distally to a narrow, mucro-
nate tip, ± conduplicate, glaucous, margins undulate,
often crisped. Inflorescence a compact, 3-10-flowered
raceme, 40-80 mm long and clustered among upper
leaves; bracts leaf-like, narrowly lanceolate, succes-
sively smaller acropetally, 30-50 x 4-6 mm, as long as
or slightly longer than pedicels, glaucous tinged pink-
ish, margins plane. Flowers suberect to spreading on
232
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 1. — Ornithoglossum pitl-
chrum. A, plant in habitat
showing sheathing, undulate
leaves and compact inflores-
cence; B, detail of campanu-
late flower showing long sta-
mens and six large, concave
nectaries each with a simple
margin near base of tepals.
Photographs: C. Mannheimer.
erecto-patent pedicels 20-35 mm long, actinomorphic,
± widely campanulate, ± 40 mm diam.; tepals equally
spreading, 27-32 x 4-5 mm, claw tubular-flattened,
± 4.0 x 1 .5 mm, blade lanceolate, faintly 7-9-veined,
slightly canaliculate, bright to dark pink, with a pale
yellow nectary region narrowly outlined with darker
red, becoming paler with age; nectary concave, wide-
mouthed, ventral margin simple. Stamens slightly
spreading; filaments straight, slightly curved distally, ±
filiform but slightly thickened in proximal half, 25-28
mm long, uniformly dark pink; anthers oblong, 2.5 x 0.5
mm, slightly curved, dull yellow. Ovary oblong-globose,
5.0 x 3.5 mm, dark pink; styles free from base, spread-
ing, straight proximally, slightly curved distally, ± 25
mm long, dark pink; stigma capitate, minutely papillate.
Capsule elliptical-oblong, shortly and bluntly lobed, 7
x 4 mm (when immature but not known when mature),
erect, coriaceous. Seeds unknown. Flowering time : June
to early Aug. Figures 1 ; 2.
Distribution and ecology. Ornithoglossum pulchrum is
currently known from just one locality in the pro-Namib,
a broad, undulating plain in southern Namibia (Figure 3).
The species has been recorded in ephemeral watercourses
from the uplands near Aus, which he just below the inland
escarpment, at approximately 1 380 m. The plants grow
in coarse gravel, close to gneiss outcrops of the Namaqua
Metamorphic Complex. Lying on the border of the win-
ter and summer rainfall zones, Aus has bimodal rainfall,
averaging 85 mm per year. Most rain falls in late summer
(January to April) with a second, lower peak in June (Pal-
lett 1995). Precipitation also occurs in the form of occa-
sional fog which moves in from the coast, as well as rare
snowfalls. Winds in the region are a powerful climatic
force which can severely limit plant growth. Like most
other Ornithoglossum species from southern Africa’s win-
ter rainfall region, O. pulchrum flowers in winter, usually
from mid to late June into August.
FIGURE 2. — Ornithoglossum pul-
chrum. A, type specimen, Mann-
heimer CM2710 (WIND); B,
specimen on left shows shal-
lowly bilobed corm, specimen
on right shows undulate, crisp-
u late-edged leaves and young,
upright capsules, Mannheimer
CM4004a (WIND). Scale bars:
A, B, 100 mm.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
233
FIGURE 3. — Known distribution of Ornithoglossum pulchrum.
Diagnosis and relationships : Ornithoglossum pul-
chrwn is distinguished by its flowers, which are suberect
to spreading in a compact raceme that barely exceeds the
leaves, and in which the ± filiform filaments are almost
as long as the tepals. The flowers are easily distinguish-
able from those of other Ornithoglossum species by their
bright to dark pink colour (47C, 48C in R.H.S Colour
Chart 1966). This colouring is almost unbroken apart
from a pale yellow patch, narrowly outlined with dark
red, near the base of each tepal in the region of the nec-
tary. O. pulchrum shares the character of undulate, crisp-
ulate-edged leaves with four other taxa in the genus, viz.
O. undulatum, O. gracile B.Nord. and O. zeyheri B.Nord..
and also O. parviflorum var. namaquense B.Nord. Com-
pared with the floral characters, however, this veg-
etative feature is of less taxonomic importance, as quite
plane-edged leaves are known in some populations of
O. undulatum (Nordenstam 1979, 1982). Nevertheless,
the undulate leaves together with the long filaments,
which nearly equal the length of the tepals, suggest
a relationship with both O. undulatum , a widespread
species in the western parts of southern Africa, and O.
zeyheri which is confined to Namaqualand between the
Steinkopf region and the lower Olifants River Valley.
O. undulatum differs from O. pulchrum in its markedly
asymmetric flowers in which one or two tepals point
downwards and the other tepals flare upwards at anthe-
sis. These are slightly smaller than those of O. pulchrum
(16-30 x 2-5 mm vs 27-32 x 4-5 mm) and are bicol-
oured, white in the centre with reddish purple tips. In
contrast, the flowers of O. pulchrum are actinomorphic
and campanulate, features that are shared with O. zey-
heri. Unlike O. pulchrum, however, this species has few
and inconspicuous flowers which are typically produced
in May, with tepals that are short and narrow (12-15
x 1-3 mm) and coloured pale greenish with a purplish
tinge towards the base and tip. The regular symmetry of
the flowers of O. pulchrum prevent possible confusion
with any other species from southern Namibia even in
the early fruiting stages, since its withered tepals remain
evenly spread around the developing suberect to spread-
ing capsule, unlike those of O. undulatum which are dis-
tinctly reflexed from a markedly down-turned capsule.
Both O. zeyheri and O. undulatum share a simple-mar-
gined nectary with O. pulchrum , although this feature is
variable in O. undulatum, sometimes taking the form of
an entire or bifid lobe.
Ornithoglossum pulchrum has only been collected
twice so far, once when in flower and again in the early
stages of fruiting. As yet, mature fruits and seeds are not
available for comparison with other species.
Species from other families that are narrowly endemic
to the Aus area are Moraea graniticola Goldblatt (Iri-
daceae) and Oxalis ausensis R.Knuth. (Oxalidaceae),
both geophytic herbs, and the succulent shrub Juttadin-
teria ausensis (L. Bolus) Schwantes (Aizoaceae). M. gra-
niticola and J. ausensis flower only after winter rain and
when temperatures begin to rise. O. ausensis is one of
four autumn-flowering Oxalis species in the vicinity of
Aus.
Other specimen seen
NAMIBIA. — 2616 (Aus): Aus town lands, (-CA), 11 Sept. 2008,
C.A.Mannheimer CM4004a (WIND).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Christine Swiegers and Telane
Greyling who assisted in the field and Michelle Smith
who prepared the figures. We thank both the Namibian
Ministry of Environment and Tourism for granting a col-
lecting permit to the National Botanical Research Insti-
tute, Windhoek, and the Curator of the National Herbar-
ium. Windhoek for the loan of material to the Compton
Herbarium, Claremont, Cape Town.
REFERENCES
BUXBAUM, F. 1936. Die Entwicklungslinien der Liliodeae. I. Die
Wurmbaeoideae. Botanisches Archiv 38: 213-293.
MANNHEIMER, C„ MAGGS-KOLLING, G., KOLBERG, H. &
RUGHEIMER, S. 2008. Wildflowers of the southern Namib.
Macmillan, Namibia.
MANNING, J., GOLDBLATT, P. & SNIJMAN, D. 2002. The color
encyclopedia of Cape bulbs. Timber Press, Oregon and Cam-
bridge.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1979. Ornithoglossum undulatum. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 45: t. 1799.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1982. A monograph of the genus Ornithoglossum
(Liliaceae). Opera Botanica 64: 1-51.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1998. Colchicaceae. In K. Kubitzki, The families
and genera of vascular plants, vol. 3. Flowering plants, mono-
cotyledons, Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Springer- Verlag,
Berlin.
PALLETT, J. 1995. The Sperrgebiet Namibia’s least known wilderness.
An environmental profile of the Sperrgebiet or Diamond Area
1 in south-western Namibia. NAMDEB Diamond Corporation,
Windhoek.
R.H.S. COLOUR CFtART. 1966. Tire Royal Horticultural Society, Lon-
don.
VINNERSTEN, A. & MANNING, J. 2007. A new classification of Col-
chicaceae. Taxon 56: 171-178.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M.G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. Livingston,
Edinburgh.
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
j
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume4141unse_1
Bothalia 41,2: 235—238 (2011)
Maireana brevifolia (Chenopodiaceae: Camphorosmeae), a new natu-
ralized alien plant species in South Africa
L. MUCINA* ** and D.A. SNIJMAN*
Keywords: Australia, Chenopodiaceae, distribution, Maireana brevifolia (R.Br.) Paul G.Wilson, new naturalized species, semi-arid South Africa
ABSTRACT
We describe and discuss the distribution of a new, naturalized alien species, Maireana brevifolia (R.Br.) Paul G.Wilson
(Chenopodiaceae), a native of Australia, in the western regions of South Africa. First discovered near Worcester, Western
Cape in 1976, the species is now established in disturbed karoo shrubby rangelands, along dirt roads and on saline alluvia,
from northern Namaqualand to the western Little Karoo. In the South African flora, M. brevifolia is most easily confused
with the indigenous Bassia salsoloides (Fenzl) A.J. Scott, from which it is distinguished by the flat to cup-shaped and almost
glabrous perianth with woolly-ciliate lobes, and the hardened and winged fruiting perianth.
INTRODUCTION
Several ecological groups of Australian alien plants
have been incorporated into the South African flora,
including a number of Fabaceae, predominantly Acacia
species (most importantly A. cyclops A.Cunn. ex G.Don.
A. longifolia (Andrews) Willd., A. mearnsii De Wild.,
A. melanoxylon R.Br., A. pycnantha Benth., A. saligna
(Labill.) H.L.Wendl.), and several species of Chenopo-
diaceae. These vary from herbaceous weeds such as
Dysphania cristala (F.Muell.) Mosyakin & Clemants (=
Chenopodium cristatum F.Muell.), D. pumilio (R.Br.)
Mosyakin & Clemants (= Chenopodium pumilio R.Br.)
to weeds of karoo shrublands and disturbed sites in the
arid biomes of southern Africa, including several notor-
ious species of Atriplex, namely A. eardleyae Aellen, A.
lindleyi Moq., A. nummularia Lindl. and A. semibaccata
R.Br. (Goldblatt & Manning 2000; Makgakga 2003).
Atriplex nummularia in particular has been cultivated
widely, especially on heavy alluvial soils in South Africa
as a dry-season fodder plant (L. Mucina pers. obs.). In
many places (especially in the Little Karoo), the species
has escaped cultivation to become an established weed,
especially on alluvia of intermittent semi-desert rivers.
During the preparation of an account for the Chenopo-
diaceae in Plants of the Greater Floristic Region 2: the
Extra Cape flora (Mucina & Snijman ined.), it became
apparent that yet another adventive species of Chenopo-
diaceae, native to Australia, is present in several places in
the western regions of South Africa.
Maireana brevifolia
Maireana brevifolia (R.Br.) Paul G.Wilson is the
newest addition in Chenopodiaceae to the alien flora
of the South African semi-deserts (Figure IB). It has
been found to become established in disturbed karoo
shrubby rangelands, along dirt roads, and on saline allu-
* Curtin Institute for Biodiversity & Climate, Department of Environ-
ment & Agriculture, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA
6845, Australia. E-mail: L.Mucina@curtin.edu.au.
** Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa. E-mail:
d.snijman@sanbi.org.za.
MS. received: 2011-03-15.
via. The latter habitat is that preferred by M. brevifolia
in its homeland — Australia. In its native range, it cov-
ers a large distribution area (Figure 1A) characterized
by Transitional’ rainfall (where the influence of western
frontal systems meets that of poorly predictable cyclonic
summer rainfall). The footprint of the distribution area
of this species marks the extent of unique temperate
Eucalyptus open woodlands that have been cleared,
especially in many parts of Western Australia, South
Australia, New South Wales, southern Queensland and
northern Victoria. The native status of this species in the
Northern Territory needs revisiting. This species has a
moderate salinity and waterlogging tolerance and prefers
heavy clay or sandy-clay alluvial soils. In Western Aus-
tralia it has been found to be one of the pioneers of re-
colonization of abandoned salinized pastures.
Maireana brevifolia is also an established weed
in Chile (Marticorena 1997), the Middle East (Danin
2000b) and the Canary Islands (Brandes 2006). Climate-
niche modelling (Figure 1C) predicts that M. brevifo-
lia could establish with high probability throughout
the Mediterranean, around the Gulf of Mexico, eastern
Argentina and neighbouring countries, as well as south-
ern China.
Maireana brevifolia might have been introduced to
South Africa when targeted as potential dry-season fod-
der or accidentally as seed admixtures with Atriplex
nummularia. The first herbarium record for the species
in South Africa, made in 1976, is from the Worcester
area, Western Cape. With her knowledge of the West-
ern Australian flora, the late Pauline Bond, formerly of
the Compton Herbarium, recognised the collection as an
alien species and was the first to identify the plants as
M. brevifolia. Since then the species has been collected
four more times, once in Namaqualand and on three sep-
arate occasions in the Western Cape, dating from the late
1990s onwards. The identity of two of these collections
has been independently confirmed by R.J. Chinnock of
the State Herbarium of South Australia, Adelaide, and H.
Freitag, Kassel, Germany.
In Australia, Maireana brevifolia has been used to
ameliorate salt-laden pastures (Runciman & Malcolm
1991; Barrett-Lennard & Malcolm 1995; Barrett-Len-
236
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
FIGURE 1. — A, distribution map of Maireana brevifolia in Australia (courtesy of Australian Virtual Herbarium, http://avh.rbg.vic.gov.au/avh/);
B, distribution map of M. brevifolia in South Africa (original); C, modelled distribution of M. brevifolia using Australian localities (stored
by www.gbif.org) as basis of model. Openmodeller generated the probability distribution using Envelope Score Algorithm (see http://open-
modeller.sourceforge.net for computation details). Colour scheme (spanning hot/red colours to cool/blue colours) used in map designates a
gradient of probability of high vs low probability of occurrence of M. brevifolia under the given climate-niche scenario.
nard et al. 2003) and with less success, also mine spoil
dumps (Jefferson 2004; Jefferson & Pennacchio 2005).
Outside Australia, M. brevifolia has been introduced for
saline soil improvement and dry-season fodder produc-
tion in Pakistan (Ilyas et al. 2000), Iraq (Abdul-Halim et
al. 1990) and Israel (Danin 2000a).
Maireana brevifolia (R.Br.) Paul G. Wilson in
Nuytsia 2: 22 (1975). Type: Australia, South Australia,
Bay XI, south coast, R. Brown (BM, holo.).
Kochia brevifolia R.Br.: 409 (1810).
Succulent-leaved shrub, up to I m high, with mostly
erect, slender, striate, sparsely woolly branches. Leaves
alternate, obovoid to narrowly fusiform, ( 1— )2 — 5 mm
long, fleshy, narrowed into a short petiole, glabrous.
Flowers bisexual, solitary, ebracteolate, glabrous except
for woolly-ciliate lobes. Fruiting perianth glabrous;
tube shallowly hemispherical, thin-walled, ± 2 mm in
diam.; wings 5, rarely absent, equal, horizontal, thin,
fan-shaped, 2-3 mm long, glabrous, with delicate brown
venation when dry, with pale to dark pink tint; perianth
lobes thick and fleshy, sharply demarcated from wings.
(Description based on Wilson 1984). Flowering time :
(Aug.-)Nov. to Apr. Figure 2.
Common names in Australia'. Small-leaf Bluebush,
Eastern Cotton Bush, Yanga Bush. None is yet known in
South Africa.
Distribution in South Africa', to date Maireana brevi-
folia has been recorded from Namaqualand, between
Anenous and Komaggas, on the lower slopes of the
Bothalia 41 ,2 (2011)
237
FIGURE 2. — Maireana brevifolia. habitat and habit: A, typical habitat of M. brevifolia — disturbed edge of dirt road crossing a shallow depression
(alluvium of intermittent river) near Komaggas (Namaqualand, South Africa); B, extensively used pasture on saline alluvium near Kondinin
(Western Australia) with a bush of M. brevifolia in foreground and scattered individuals in the rear. C, D, Mucina 280407/03 MJG, NBG', from
Komaggas, South Africa: C, form with deep pink fruit; D. erect-branched habit of M. brevifolia bushes. E, Mucina 102010/03 Curtin Univ.
Herbarium from Corrigin. Western Australia: form with pale pink fruit. All photographs: L. Mucina.
eastern Cederberg Mtns bordering on the Tanqua Karoo,
the Worcester-Robertson Karoo and the western Lit-
tle Karoo. As long as disturbed habitats such as those
formed along dirt roads and on saline alluvia are avail-
able for this colonizer, M. brevifolia will persist as an
established alien in the South African flora.
Notes : the genus Maireana is native to mainland
Australia and has ± 57 species. M. brevifolia is the only
species of the genus known to have been introduced
into South Africa so far. Within the South African flora,
Maireana is most closely related to Bassia All., which
is the only native genus belonging to tribe Camphoros-
meae ( sensu Akhani et al. 2007). Maireana is distin-
guished from Bassia by flowers that are usually solitary
or in pairs in the leaf axils, the flat to cup-shaped and
mostly glabrous perianth (except in M. brevifolia where
the lobes are woolly-ciliate), and the hardened and
winged fruiting perianth. In contrast, Bassia has solitary
flowers or flowers arranged in spicate inflorescences, an
urn-shaped perianth, and the fruiting perianth has spine-
like or tubercle-like appendages or membranous, scari-
ous wings. M. brevifolia is most easily confused with
B. salsoloides (Fenzl) A.J. Scott, commonly known as
the basterinkbos, which is widespread in sandy, alluvial
soils along water courses and seasonal washes from the
Free State in the northeast, through the central Karoo to
Matjiesfontein, Western Province, in the southwest. B.
salsoloides has linear to filiform, succulent leaves that
are ± pubescent, flowers borne in tight, short, spike-like
clusters, a pubescent perianth, and a fruiting perianth
that enlarges into short, firm, brown-streaked wings,
with irregularly toothed margins.
Specimens examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Namaqualand, north-
west of Komaggas, sandy-clayey saline donga, 29°17'51.76"S,
17°28T0.02"E, (-CD), 28 Apr. 2007, L. Mucina 280407/05 (MJG).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3219 (Wuppertal): Matjies River Nature
Reserve, Upland Succulent Karoo, stony soil, 760 m, 32°29.90'S,
19°20.30'E, (-AD), 21 Nov. 1999, A.B. Low 5835 (NBG); Matjies
River Nature Reserve, roadsides and valley bottom on old fields, on
sandy or loamy soils, 32°30'03"S, 19°20'18"E, (-CB), Apr. 2002, PM.
Holmes s.n. (NBG). 3319 (Worcester): Karoo Garden, Worcester, in
Euphorbia mauritanica patches, 300 m, (-CB), Mar. 1976, M.B. Bayer
149 (NBG). 3321 (Ladismith): 0.4 km east of T-junction of R327 with
connecting road to R323 just west of Langberg [Langeberg], abundant
along roadsides in Acacia karroo / Aizoaceae low shrubland, on stony
brown loam, ± 33°49’30"S, 21°28'07"E, (-CD), 21 Aug. 1998, R.J.
Chinnock 9194 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank H. Freitag for the identification of a col-
lection of Maireana brevifolia from South Africa. L.
238
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
Mucina thanks the Northern Cape Nature Conservation
Service, Kimberley for awarding a plant collecting per-
mit. G.J. Campbell-Young kindly proofread the manu-
script. M. Smith prepared the distribution map for South
Africa. We also thank two anonymous referees for their
invaluable input.
REFERENCES
ABDUL-HAL1M, R.K.., AL-BADRI, F.R., YASIN, S.H. & ALI, A.T.
1990. Survival and productivity of chenopods in salt-affected
lands of Iraq. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 3 1 :
77-84.
AKHANI, H„ EDWARDS, G. & ROALSON, E.H. 2007. Diversifica-
tion of the Old World Salsoleaes./. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular
phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and
a revised classification. International Journal of Plant Science
168: 931-956.
BARRETT-LENNARD, E.G. & MALCOLM, C.V. 1995. Saltland pas-
tures in Australia. West Australian Dept, of Agriculture Bulletin
No. 4312. Dept of Agriculture, Perth.
BARRETT-LENNARD, E.G., MALCOLM, C.V. & BATHGATE, A.
2003. Saltland pastures in Australia — a practical guide, edn 2.
CRC for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Perth.
BRANDES, D. 2006. Urbanizaciones: Die Entstehung stadtischer
Lebensraume aus der Halbwiiste. Geobotanische Kolloquien 20:
13-20.
BROWN, R. 1810. Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae. Johnson, Lon-
don.
DANIN, A. 2000a. The inclusion of adventive plants in the second edi-
tion of Flora Palaestina. Willdenowia 30: 305-314.
DANIN, A. 2000b. Species ‘new to’ the Flora Palaestina area. Flora
Mediterranea 10: 109-172.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus
of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical
Garden, Pretoria & Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis.
ILYAS, M„ HASSAN, M„ MUHAMMAD, W. & MUHAMMAD, N.
2000. Study of yield and yield components of exotic Atriplex and
Maireana in the saline environments ofNWFP. Pakistan Journal
of Biological Sciences 3: 1 873-1 876.
JEFFERSON, L.V. 2004. Implications of plant density on the resulting
community structure of mine site land. Restoration Ecology 12:
429-J38.
JEFFERSON, L.V. & PENNACCHIO, M. 2005. The impact of shade on
establishment of shrubs adapted to the high light irradiation of semi-
arid environments. Journal of Arid Environments 63: 706-716.
MAK.GAK.GA, M.C. 2003. Chenopodiaceae. In G. Germishuizen &
N.L. Meyer, Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist.
Strelitzia 14. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
MARTICORENA, C. 1997. La presencia de Maireana brevifolia
(R.Br.) Paul G. Wilson en Chile continental. Revista Gayana
Botanica 54: 193, 194.
MITCHELL, T.L. 1848. Journal of an expedition into the interior of
tropical Australia. Longman, London.
MUCINA, L. & SNIJMAN, D.A. ined. Amaranthaceae. In D.A. Snij-
man. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 2: the Extra
Cape flora. Strelitzia. South African National Biodiversity Insti-
tute, Cape Town.
RUNCIMAN, H.V. & MALCOLM, C.V. 1991. Forage shrubs and
grasses for revegetating saltland. West Australian Dept of Agri-
culture Bulletin No. 4153.
WILSON, P.G. 1975. A taxonomic revision of the genus Maireana
(Chenopodiaceae). Nuytsia 2: 2-82.
WILSON, P.G. 1984. Chenopodiaceae. In A.S. George, Flora of Australia
4: 81-330. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Bothalia 41,2: 239-267 (2011)
Taxonomic revision of the genus Thereianthus (Iridaceae: Crocoideae)
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
Keywords: Crocoideae, Iridaceae, new species, pollen, southern Africa, taxonomy, Thereianthus G.J. Lewis
ABSTRACT
Thereianthus G.J. Lewis is revised, with full descriptions and synonomy, distribution maps, and notes on ecology and tax-
onomic history. All species are illustrated, and capsule and seed morphology are described for many of the species for the first
time. Novel characteristics of the bract, seed, and pollen operculum are used to separate the species into two sections: sect.
Brevibracteae Goidblatt & J.C. Manning is distinguished by relatively small bracts, 3-8 mm long and uniformly leathery or
soft-textured without thickened veins, seeds with filiform chalazal extension, and pollen grains with 1 -banded operculum; and
sect. Thereianthus by relatively larger bracts, (7— )8— 1 5 mm long with prominently sclerified veins, seeds without any exten-
sion to the chalazal crest, and pollen grains with ± 2-banded operculum. Species in sect. Thereianthus are further segregated
into ser. Thereianthus , with heavily ribbed leaves and suberect flowers with arcuate or erect stamens, and ser. Bracteolatus,
with plane, inconspicuously veined leaves and ± spreading flowers with declinate stamens. Eleven species are recognized in
the genus, all restricted to the southwestern portion of Western Cape. Two new species are described in sect. Thereianthus :
T. bulbiferus Goidblatt & J.C. Manning, known from three populations along the West Coast, is distinguished by the unique
development of cormels in the lower leaf axil, and by its actinomorphic perianth with white marks at the base of each tepal
and ± declinate stamens; and T. elandsmontanus Goidblatt & J.C. Manning, known from a single population in Elandsberg
Nature Reserve near Wellington, has distinctive cream-coloured, moderately long-tubed flowers with unusually narrow, linear
tepals heavily marked with purple near the base. In adddition, T. lapeyrousioides [now T. minutus] var. elatior G.J. Lewis in
sect. Brevibracteae is raised to species status as T. intermedius Goidblatt & J.C. Manning, differing from typical T. minutus
by the shorter perianth tube (10-13 vs 20-30 mm), shorter bracts (3-5 vs 6-8 mm), and smaller, ovoid capsules, 4-5 mm long.
containing ovoid seeds vs flask-shaped capsules 6-8 mm long
INTRODUCTION
Thereianthus G.J.Lewis is a small genus of deciduous
geophytes endemic to the southwestern, winter rainfall
region of Western Cape, where it is essentially restricted
to mainly montane soils derived from quartzitic sand-
stone (Manning et al. 2002). Eight species are currently
recognized, all of them flowering during the hot summer
months, mostly November to January. Most are ± pyro-
phytes, flowering most profusely in the season after the
veld has been cleared by burning.
Cladistic analysis of plastid DNA sequence data lo-
cates Thereianthus as sister to Micranthus (Pers.) Eckl.,
with these two genera together placed as sister to Watso-
nia Mill, plus Pillansia L. Bolus (Reeves et a/. 2002;
Goidblatt et al. 2008). These four genera, with Cya-
nixia Goidblatt & J.C. Manning, Lapeirousia Pourr. and
Savannosiphon Goidblatt & Marais, are now treated as
the tribe Watsonieae of subfamily Crocoideae (Goid-
blatt et al. 2008; Goidblatt & Manning 2008), charac-
terized by axillary conn development in which the cur-
rent season’s corm develops from an axillary bud at the
base of the stem rather than by expansion of the lower
stem intemodes as in other crocoid genera. Morphologi-
cal synapomorphies for Micranthus plus Thereianthus
are the superposed leaves, small, blue flowers, and ±
dry bracts with membranous margins (Goidblatt et al.
2006). The leaves in both Micranthus and Thereianthus
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town; Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, 3209 Scottsville, South Africa. E-mail: J.Manning@sanbi.org.za.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA. E-mail: peter.
goldblatt@mobot.org.
MS. received: 2011-02-15.
and fusiform seeds.
are all strictly cauline (Lewis 1954), with the lowermost
sub-basal, and the corm tunics are thus formed solely
from the cataphylls, without any contribution from the
bases of the lower leaves. Chromosome number, 2 n
= 20, and a karyotype of one long and nine short chro-
mosome pairs in Micranthus and Thereianthus is likely
plesiomorphic for the tribe. Watsonia, in contrast, has a
derived base chromosome number ofx = 9.
The moderately short spikes of spirally inserted flow-
ers, bracts with narrow membranous margins, and mono-
sulcate pollen distinguish Thereianthus from Micran-
thus, which has elongate, distichous spikes, bracts with
broad membranous margins, and zonasulcate pollen
(Goidblatt & Manning 2008). Our investigation of leaf
anatomy in the genus (see Results and discussion of
characters) indicates that a simple leaf margin is an addi-
tional anatomical apomorphy for Thereianthus.
Thereianthus was published by Lewis (1941), who
recognized seven species in the genus. One new species
has been described since then (Manning & Goidblatt
2004), at which time we also reduced T. lapeyrousioides
var. elatior G.J.Lewis to synonymy in T. minutus (= T.
lapeyrousioides var. lapeyrousioides). We have now had
the opportunity of examining fresh material of var. ela-
tior, which makes it clear that this taxon is in fact a dis-
tinct species. We also describe another two new species
that appeared after a bum near Tulbagh, bringing the
total number of species in the genus to eleven.
Taxonomic history, the taxonomic history of There-
ianthus is closely linked to that of Micranthus, reflect-
ing the marked similarities between the two genera and
the uncertainty that existed around their circumscrip-
tion. The first species of both genera known to science
were referred to either Ixia or to Gladiolus, following
the rather vague generic circumscriptions prevailing at
240
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
the time but Ker Gawler (1804) subsequently included
all known species in Watsonici based on their divided
style branches. This treatment was not followed by Eck-
lon (1827), who concluded that the two genera were
distinct from Watsonia and who also appreciated the
differences between them. His new genus Micranthus
(Ecklon 1827), which was established for the small-
flowered species with strongly distichous spikes, was
recognized by most later authors but acceptance of a
second new genus for the larger-flowered species with
longer perianth tubes was less than universal. Eck-
lon ( 1 827) placed the two species of Thereianthus then
known. Gladiolus spicatus L. (now T. spicatus) and G.
triticeus Thunb. (now T. bracteolatus), in his new genus
Beilia but failed to provide a validating description, and
Beilia was thus not validly published. Heynhold (1847)
remained unconvinced that generic rank was appropri-
ate for Ecklon’s species of Beilia , preferring to include
them with the species of Micranthus , and he accordingly
made the new combinations M. spicatus (L.) Heyn. and
M. triticeus (Thunb.) Heyn. English bulb specialist, J.G.
Baker ( 1 877), in his account of the family, was of yet
another opinion, reverting to Ecklon’s circumscription of
Micranthus but following Ker Gawler (1804) in retain-
ing Thereianthus in Watsonia , as the unranked taxon
Beilia. Here he recognized just one species, W. punctata
(Andrews) Ker Gawk, with the earlier name, Gladiolus
spicatus L., in synonymy. At the same time he described
the third known species of Thereianthus , T. juncifolius,
in the genus Morphixia (now a synonym of Ixia). Beilia
was subsequently accorded the rank of subgenus within
Watsonia by Baker ( 1 892, 1 896), who admitted four taxa
at species rank, among them his erstwhile Morphixia
juncifolia and also W. lapeyrousioides. At this stage,
therefore, although Baker (1896) accepted both Micran-
thus and Thereianthus as currently circumscribed, only
the former was accorded generic rank.
Klatt (1882), a contemporary of Baker’s, utterly con-
fused the situation in his account of the Iridaceae. Here,
he included only two species in Micranthus , M. spicatus
(L.) Klatt and M. triticeus ( Burnt. f. [sic]) Klatt, both of
them actually species of Thereianthus , evidently una-
ware that Heynhold (1847) had already made the combi-
nations for these species in Micranthus. We also assume
that the attribution of the basionym to Burman fi 1 . was
an error for Thunberg, as Ixia triticea Burnt. f. (1768) is
a very different species [Tritoniopsis triticea (Burnt. f.)
Goldblatt] . Like Baker (1877) before him, Klatt (1882)
did not associate T. juncifolius with the other two spe-
cies, treating it instead in the genus Anomatheca as A.
calamifolia. He then spread his options still wider by
describing a fourth species of Thereianthus in Watso-
nia as W. racemosa Klatt. Inexplicably, Klatt over-
looked any species of Micranthus (as now understood)
in his account, an omission that he later partly cor-
rected (Klatt 1894) when he included M. plantagineus
[= M. alopecuroides (L.) Eckl.] in Micranthus with one
variety, var. junceus Baker [now M. junceus (Baker)
N. E.Br.]. In this work, T. spicatus remained in Micran-
thus and T. racemosus in Watsonia , where it was joined
by T. bracteolatus (as W. subulatus) but T. juncifolius
was transferred to Freesia as F. juncifolia (Klatt 1894).
This confusing species was later removed to yet another
genus by Brown (1931) as Lapeirousia juncifolia, by
which time it had been shuffled among no less than five
different genera. Lewis (1941) had no doubt that it cor-
rectly belonged in Thereianthus.
The nomenclatural tangle between Micranthus and
Thereianthus took a further turn when Kuntze (1891)
erected a new genus, Paulomagnusia, in which he
included both what are now Micranthus alopecuroides
and Thereianthus spicatus. The lectotype of Paulomag-
nusia is P. alopecuroides (now M. alopecuroides), des-
ignated by Goldblatt & Manning (2008) and the genus is
now a nomenclatural synonym of Micranthus. Ecklon’s
Beilia was raised to generic rank by Kuntze ( 1 898), who
included only B. spicata (L.) Eckl. ex Kuntze in the
genus. Unfortunately Beilia Kuntze is nomenclaturally
superfluous since Kuntze listed the validly published
Paulomagnusia in synonymy without any further expla-
nation. Kuntze also recognized var. brevifolia in his B.
spicata, and although this taxon has never been identi-
fied, its provenance from the Cape Town suburb of
Mowbray, and its broad leaves (10-20 mm) make it cer-
tain this is not a species of Thereianthus. It remained for
G.J. Lewis (1941), over a century after Ecklon proposed
Beilia, to publish the genus Thereianthus for the two
species of Ecklon’s Beilia plus an additional four more
species that were until then included in Watsonia.
Chromosome cytology, chromosome numbers are
known for just two species of Thereianthus, T. minutus
(sect. Brevibracteae) and T. bracteolatus (sect. Therei-
anthus). Both have a diploid number of 2 n = 20 and
an identical karyotype of one long and nine short chro-
mosome pairs (Goldblatt 1971 ). A report of 2n = 20 by
Goldblatt & Takei (1997) for T. spicatus is an error for
T. bracteolatus, thus representing a second count for that
species. The base number and karyotype match exactly
those of Micranthus but both are likely plesiomorphic
and thus uninformative about relationships. The two spe-
cies of Thereianthus counted, one from each section of
the genus, and the matching counts for Micranthus, sug-
gest that the basic karyotype is unlikely to differ among
the other species of Thereianthus.
Pollination systems : there are few published obser-
vations on the pollination of Thereianthus , and neither
Scott Elliot (1891) nor Vogel (1954) mentioned the
genus in their early studies of pollination in the South
African flora. Flowers of the genus are, however, diverse
and obviously adapted to a variety of mainly long-
tongued insect pollinators. At least T. ixioides has been
reported to be visited by the hopbine beetles, Hetero-
chelus sp. and Peritrichia sp. (Scarabaeidae: Hopliini).
Individuals of Peritrichia were observed moving indis-
criminately between the flowers of this species and the
remarkably similar blooms of Ixia metelerkampiae, the
pale mauve flowers of which also have a dark centre
(Goldblatt et al. 2000). These authors suggested this was
a possible example of Batesian mimicry. Although both
species have a filiform perianth tube in which the style
is tightly enclosed by the walls of the tube, T. ixioides
offers small amounts of nectar, visible at the mouth of
the tube, suggesting that the species offers a secondary
reward and may have a more generalist pollination sys-
tem than /. metelerkampiae, which does not offer nectar.
Goldblatt et al. ( 1998) also reported apparent pollination
of T. racemosus by the hopbine, Khoina bilateral is , in
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
241
the Grootwinterhoek Wilderness area. This species, too,
produces traces of nectar and has a strong floral scent and
is likely to have alternative pollinators, probably various
bees.
Goldblatt & Manning (2006) inferred long-proboscid
fly pollination for Thereianthus longicollis, which has
a perianth tube 25-40 mm long. That prediction has
recently been validated: the long proboscid fly, Philoli-
che rostrata (proboscis ± 40 mm long), was captured
visiting flowers of this species in the mountains above
Tulbagh Waterfall in December 2010 (unpublished obs.).
Other representatives of this pollination guild at the site
included T. minutus, Geissorhiza confusa (Iridaceae)
and a long-tubed and large-flowered race of Lobelia
coronopifolia (Lobeliaceae) with a pink corolla. Visits
by P. rostrata to T. minutus (perianth tube 20-30 mm
long) were also recorded at this site. Another species, T.
elandsmontanus, also has flowers with the hallmarks of
long-proboscid fly pollination, notably a slender perianth
tube mostly 20-23 mm long and a white or pale pinkish
perianth with red markings. We predict that it is also pol-
linated by the long-proboscid flies Prosoeca guiosa and/
or P. rostrata.
We have noted the butterfly, Cynthia cardui (Nym-
phalidae), visiting the moderately long-tubed flowers of
Thereianthus spicatus at Jonkershoek. and moving from
flower to flower in a constant pattern. This insect may
be one of the legitimate pollinators of this widespread
species. We infer bee or generalist pollination for the
shorter-tubed species T. bracteolatus, T. bulbiferus and
T. intermedins. The long-tubed, violet flowers of T. mon-
tanus appear to be adapted for pollination by long-pro-
boscid flies or butterflies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All relevant types were examined, as well as all her-
barium material from BOL, NBG and SAM (acronyms
after Holmgren et ai. 1990), the primary collections of
species from the southwestern Cape. Most species were
also studied in the field.
For SEM work, fresh pollen grains were fixed in
FAA, critical point dried following standard procedures,
and examined at the SEM Unit, University of Cape
Town by Miranda Waldron. For operculum and sculp-
turing study, dry pollen from herbarium specimens was
rehydrated and stained in Calberla’s fluid (Goldblatt et
ai. 1991). Pollen was sampled from at least two flow-
ers per voucher. Seed shape and size was determined by
examining seeds from one or more capsules from two or
more different plants of each species.
For anatomical investigation, fresh material was
fixed in FAA and then embedded in wax before section-
ing and double-staining with alcian blue and safranin
following Rudall (1995). Mature leaf anatomy of the
following species was examined: Thereianthus race-
mosus, T. minutus, T. bulbiferus and T. spicatus. Ana-
tomical descriptions and terminology follow Rudall
(1995). Bract and bracteole anatomy was examined in T.
minutus and T. spicatus.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OF CHARACTERS
Leaf blade anatomy (Figures 1 A-F; 2)
Outline', surfaces smooth and ± parallel in Thereian-
thus bulbiferus, T. minutus and T. racemosus (Figures
1A-C; 2A-D), terete in T. juncifolius (Figure IF), ellip-
tical and fistulose in T. bracteolatus (Figures ID; 2E),
and abruptly raised over larger vascular bundles in T.
spicatus and surface thus ribbed or corrugated (Figures
1 E; 2F); pseudomidrib not evident except in T. minutus
but never raised in fresh leaves.
Margin : simple, i.e. without prominent marginal vein
or subepidermal sclerenchyma, rarely with small mar-
ginal bundle along one edge in T. bulbiferus', epidermal
cells unspecialized.
Mesophvll : cells ± isodiametric with no tissue dif-
ferentiation except at midrib area in T. minutus or with
evident differentiation between parenchyma and chlor-
enchyma (T. bulbiferus and T. juncifolius ) or ± radially
elongated with clear differentiation between peripheral
chlorenchyma and central mesophyll (T. bracteolatus , T.
racemosus and T. spicatus).
Vascular bundles', arranged in two rows, with larger
(primary and secondary bundles) in opposite pairs and
smaller (tertiary) bundles opposite or subopposite,
xylem poles usually separated, rarely fused in lateral
secondary bundles in T. minutus', primary bundles in T.
bulbiferus with tertiary bundle on each side contiguous
with sclerenchyma sheath; a single pair of primary bun-
dles can be identified in all species but this is most evi-
dent in T. minutus with differentiation between the pri-
mary bundle and secondary bundles less marked in other
species, particularly T. spicatus.
Bundle sheaths: bundle sheath sclerenchyma extend-
ing to epidermis as girder in primary bundles in all spe-
cies and also in secondary bundles in T. bracteolatus, T.
bulbiferus and T. spicatus, cells of outer bundle sheath
each containing solitary styloid crystal at phloem poles
in larger bundles; larger (primary) bundles with com-
plete sclerenchyma sheaths in T. bulbiferus, T. bracteo-
latus, T. juncifolius, T. minutus and T. spicatus but scari-
fication restricted to phloem caps in T. racemosus.
The most obvious distinction in leaf outline among the
species is between the ribbed/corrugated blade of There-
ianthus spicatus and the smooth blades of the other spe-
cies examined. The leaves of T. minutus and T. racemosus
are least sclerified, with only the primary bundle signifi-
cantly sclerified, compared with T. bulbiferus, T. bracteo-
latus, T. juncifolius and T. spicatus, in which some or all
of the secondary vascular bundles have completely scleri-
fied sheaths. This is most marked in T. spicatus.
Leaf blade anatomy in Thereianthus accords with the
general description for the genus (Rudall 1995) with the
significant exception that the leaf margin in all species
examined is essentially simple (i.e. lacking a prominent
marginal vascular bundle and with unspecialized epider-
mis) (Figure 2A, C-F). Rudall (1995). who examined
only T. spicatus , describes this species as possessing a
marginal vascular bundle. The outermost vascular bun-
dle is treated as marginal if it is prominent and solitary
(not paired) and oriented at right angles to the margin
with the phloem pole facing the margin. In T. minutus
and T. spicatus the outermost bundles at the leaf edges
242
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE I. — A-F, leaf tissue plans
of Thereianthus species: A, T.
minutus; B, T. racemosus', C,
T. bulbiferus; D, T. bracteola-
tus\ E, T. spicatus; F, T. junci-
folius. G, H, bract tissue plans:
G, T. spicatus ; H. T. minutus.
Scale bar: A-F, 500 pm; G,
H, 2 mm. Sclerenchyma solid
shading; xylem hatched. Art-
ist: John Manning.
FIGURE 2. — Leaf anatomy of Therei-
anthus species: A, T. minutus
leaf margin; B, T. minutus
pseudomidrib; C, T. racemosus
margin; D, T. bulbiferus mar-
gin; E, T. bracteolatus margin;
F, T. spicatus margin. Scale
bar: 200 pm.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
243
are clearly paired with the phloem poles facing the leaf
surface, and the leaves thus clearly lack marginal veins.
This is evidently also the condition in centric-leaved
T. bracteolatus and T. juncifolius but is less clear in T.
bulbiferus, in which a smaller bundle is located margin-
ally along only one edge of the leaf. In T. racemosus a
very small tertiary bundle occurs in a similar position
along one margin but is embedded within the chloren-
chyma and not located at the parenchyma/chlorenchyma
boundary as usual and is thus probably a minor branch.
A simple leaf margin is also characteristic of Pillcmsia
but not of Micranthus and Watsonia, both of which have
a well-developed marginal bundle with sclerenchyma
girder (Rudall 1995).
The presence of a marginal bundle is likely the ple-
siomorpic condition in Watsonieae (Rudall 1995). Opti-
mizing leaf margin condition on the molecular phy-
logeny of the family in Goldblatt et al. (2006, 2008)
indicates that it is most parsimonious to treat the simple
leaf margin as independently derived in Thereianthus
and Pillansia. Reversals to the simple leaf margins have
occurred several times elsewhere in the Crocoideae (e.g.
some species of Geissorhiza Ker Gawk, Hesperantha
Ker Gawl. and Lapeirousia). The character is most par-
simoniously treated as a homoplasious autapomorphy in
each instance.
Bract anatomy (Figure 1G, H)
The floral bracts of Thereianthus minutus are incon-
spicuously veined, with the vascular bundles lacking
sclerified phloem caps (Figure 1G), in contrast to the
prominently veined bracts in T. spicatus. in which the
vascular bundles have well-developed sclerenchyma
phloem caps (Figure 1H). As the bracts dry and the mes-
ophyll tissue collapses, the vascular bundles in T. spica-
tus become raised and very conspicuous whereas those
in T. minutus remain inconspicuous.
Pollen aperture and sculpturing (Figure 3)
Pollen aperture condition and exine sculpturing of
most species of Thereianthus was examined by Gold-
blatt et al. (1991). Their findings and those of the present
study covering the remaining species, are presented here
(Table 1 ). Pollen in all species is monosulcate and oper-
culate, with a tectate-columellate, sparsely scabrate tec-
tum. Operculum condition and exine sculpturing vary
in the genus. Exine sculpturing in most species is per-
forate (diameter of the lumina 0.25-1.0 * the width of
the intervening walls) (Figure 3 A, B) but is reticulate
(diameter of the lumina 2-3 x the width of the interven-
ing walls) in T. intermedins (Figure 3C, D), T. montanus
and T. racemosus , except on the operculum, where it is
perforate. The reticulate exine in these species recalls
the pollen of the sister genus Micranthus , the only other
genus of Crocoideae with reticulate exine but this genus
differs from Thereianthus and other Crocoideae in its
zonasulcate aperture (Goldblatt et al. 1991).
The operculum in most species is 1 -banded (Figure
3A, B) but is completely or incompletely 2-banded in
Thereianthus intermedius (Figure 3C), T. juncifolius ,
T. minutus , T. montanus and T. racemosus (Table 1).
A completely 2-banded (rarely 1 -banded) operculum
(the bands well separated by the apertural membrane)
is characteristic of T. intermedius, T. juncifolius and T.
FIGURE 3. — Pollen morphology of
Thereianthus species. A, B,
T. bracteolatus'. A, aperture
with 1 -banded operculum
(arrowed); B, monosulcate
grain with microperforate tec-
tum. C, D, T. intermedius'. C,
aperture with 2-banded oper-
culum (arrowed); D, reticulate
exine.
244
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
TABLE 1 . — Pollen operculum type and exine sculpturing in Thereian-
ihus. Square brackets [ ] indicate closely associated operculum
bands, and curved brackets () indicate the less common opercu-
lum character state
racemosus but the operculum is incompletely 2-banded
in T. minutus and T. montanus. In these two species the
operculum is apparently 1 -banded but lacks exine along
the centre of the operculum in some or all grains, sug-
gesting incomplete fusion of two separate bands (Gold-
blatt et al. 1991 ).
A 2-banded operculum and perforate exine are likely
plesiomorphic conditions for Crocoideae, and more spe-
cifically for Watsonieae (Goldblatt et al. 1991), suggest-
ing that the species in sect. Brevibracteae with reticulate
exine as well as those species in sect. Thereiantlms with
1 -banded operculum are derived in these two respects.
MORPHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
Thereiantlms is, relative to its size, quite as diverse
florally as other genera of Crocoideae (Goldblatt &
Manning 2006). Although the reproductive biology
remains poorly known, the species display a variety
of floral syndromes, including adaptations to short-
tongued, generalist, hopbine beetles, and to several
variants of long-proboscid fly or butterfly pollination
systems. Floral symmetry and perianth tube length
are valuable characters for discriminating the species.
Vegetative differences also provide critical diagnostic
characters. Four types of leaf blade are evident: linear
or lanceolate and plane with a single main or primary
vein (pseudomidrib) evident but not raised when fresh
and without evident secondary veins, the pseudomidrib
becoming raised in herbarium material through collapse
of the mesophyll tissue (71 minutus ); linear and plane
with more than one ± equally strong primary vein plus
secondary veins (71 bulbiferus, 71 intermedins, 71 minu-
tus, 71 montanus and 71 racemosus)', linear-filiform and
elliptic or terete in section without evident primary vein
(pseudomidrib) (71 bracteolatus and 71 juncifolius)', and
linear-corrugate with several equally strongly thick-
ened and raised primary veins plus secondary veins (71
elandsmontanus, 71 ixioides, 71 longicollis and 71 spica-
tus).
The striking variation in capsule shape and especially
in seed form that is evident in the genus has remained
undocumented until now. The remarkable seeds of
Thereiantlms minutus — fusiform with a long, thread-
like chalazal extension — were first noted by Manning
& Goldblatt (2004), who mistakenly interpreted the
thread-like extension as an elongated funicle. From later
examination of freshly opened, mature capsules, we are
able to confirm that the thread-like structure represents
a prolongation of the chalazal crest and not the funicle.
Similar filiform chalazal extensions of variable length
also characterize the seeds of T. intermedins, T. juncifo-
lius and T. racemosus (seeds unknown for T. montanus).
The thread-like chalazal extension is least developed in
T. racemosus, in which it is shorter than the seed body
and ± straight, but in T. intermedins , T. minutus, and T.
juncifolius the extension is two to three times longer
than the seed body and sharply bent back ± midway to
form a hooked or crook-like extension. The latter two
species have fusiform seeds and the chalazal extension
extends significantly beyond the seed body before bend-
ing back. In these two species the chalazal extensions
are largely accommodated in the elongated neck or beak
of the flask-shaped capsules. The function of the thread-
like extension is unknown.
Variation in pollen morphology in Thereiantlms was
first documented by Goldblatt et al. (1991), who discov-
ered two distinct types of operculum and exine sculptur-
ing among the species that they examined. The pollen
operculum in T. bracteolatus, T. ixioides, T. longicollis
and T. spicatus was clearly I -banded but was completely
or incompletely 2-banded in T. juncifolius, T. minutus
and T. racemosus. The latter condition was interpreted
as basic for the genus. Most species examined had
the usual microperforate tectum. The sole exception,
T. racemosus, had unusual reticulate exine sculptur-
ing, which was also found to characterize all species of
Micranthus. We have now examined pollen morphology
in all Thereiantlms species.
Thereiantlms species fall into two distinct, evidently
monophyletic groups on the basis of bract size and vena-
tion, seed shape, and pollen operculum condition: the T.
racemosus group, treated here as sect. Brevibracteae,
which is characterized by shorter bracts lacking promi-
nent veins, evidently specialized seeds with a filiform
chalazal extension (unknown in T. montanus), and pol-
len with a plesiomorphic, 2-banded operculum; and the
T. spicatus group, treated here as sect. Thereiantlms,
which has larger, prominently veined bracts, seeds with
an unspecialized chalazal crest, and apomorphic pollen
with a 1 -banded operculum. Leaf and bract anatomy, as
well as filament orientation and length, further group the
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
245
members of sect. Thereianthus into two groups, treated
here as series. The four species with strongly thickened
and raised primary veins and shorter, erect or arcuate
filaments comprise ser. Thereianthus , and the remaining
two species with plane or smooth leaves and longer, dec-
imate filaments comprise ser. Bracteolatus.
TAXONOMY
Thereianthus G.J. Lewis in Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 7: 33 (1941). Lectotype: Thereianthus spica-
tus (L.) G.J. Lewis, designated by Goldblatt & Manning:
130 (2008).
Beilia Eckl.: 43 (1827), nom. nud.
Beilia Eckl. ex Kuntze: 305 (1898), nom. illegit.
superfl. pro Paulomagnusia Kuntze (1891) [= Micran-
thus (Pers.) Eckl., nom. cons.]. Type: Beilia spicata
(L.) Eckl. ex Kuntze (= Thereianthus spicatus (L.)
G.J. Lewis).
Watsonia unranked Beilia Eckl. ex Baker 16: 158
(1877). Type: Watsonia punctata (Andrews) Ker Gawl.
(= Thereianthus bracteolatus (Lam.) G.J. Lewis).
Watsonia subgen. Beilia Eckl. ex Baker: 177 (1892).
Lectotype: Watsonia punctata (Andrews) Ker Gawl. (=
Thereianthus bracteolatus (Lam.) G.J. Lewis), here des-
ignated.
Etymology >: from the Greek, thereios, summer, an-
thos, flower.
Deciduous geophytes with globose corm. axillary in
origin and rooting from below, tunics of coarsely net-
ted fibres. Cataphylls 2. Leaves 3 or 4(6), all cauline and
superposed, usually ± dry at flowering, lowermost sub-
basal, longest, inserted on stem above corm but below
ground level, blade falcate or linear with margins not
thickened, plane and either with definite main or primary
vein (pseudomidrib) or with several equally prominent
veins, or ± terete, glabrous or rarely scabridulous, usu-
ally dry at flowering, upper leaves progressively shorter,
uppermost sometimes entirely sheathing. Stem usually
unbranched, rarely with short branch from upper leaf
axil, terete in section. Inflorescence a crowded or rarely
lax spike, flowers spirally arranged or ± 2-ranked in bud,
entire spike loosely spirally twisted at anthesis; bracts
firm-textured, short, often overlapping, green below with
apices dry and brown or entirely dry, smooth or promi-
nently veined, inner 2-nerved and apically forked but
splitting to base as capsule matures, mostly membranous
(leathery in T. juncifolius). Flowers actinomorphic or
zygomorphic, long-lived, closing at night, usually blue
to purple, rarely white or pinkish, unmarked or lower
three tepals with darker markings in lower '/2, some-
times all tepals with white markings, usually unscented,
with nectar from septal nectaries; perianth tube short to
elongate, funnel-shaped or cylindric; tepals subequal, ±
spreading. Stamens unilateral and arcuate or declinate or
central and symmetrically arranged; filaments inserted
shortly below top of perianth tube, slender, free; anthers
linear, dehiscing longitudinally, usually purple. Ovary’
subglobose; style filiform, branches slender and deeply
divided, recurved. Capsules woody, ovoid to spindle- or
flask-shaped, tardily dehiscent. Seeds angular-elongate
with chalazal crest or narrowly ovoid-fusiform with
thread-like or filiform chalazal extension, smooth or
wrinkled, matte. Basic chromosome number, x = 10.
Eleven species, South Africa, restricted to the win-
ter rainfall zone in the southwestern portion of western
Cape, mostly in nutrient-poor, stony sandstone soils; two
Key to species
la Bracts short, 3-8 mm long, uniformly leathery or soft-textured and without prominent veins (sect. Brevibracteae ):
2a Leaf blades filiform-terete; spike lax, bracts distant (lower intemodes 3-5 * longer than bracts); inner bracts as long as or slightly longer
than outer and similar in texture, both uniformly green with dry, papery apices; tepals ovate-obovate; stamens central 5. T. juncifolius
2b Leaf blades linear to falcate, plane; spike dense, bracts ± imbricate (lower intemodes < twice as long as bracts); inner bracts shorter
than outer and membranous-papery except along veins; tepals lanceolate; stamens unilateral-arcuate:
3a Perianth tube very short, 1.0 — 1.5 mm long, included in bracts L T. racemosus
3b Perianth tube longer, 10-30 mm long, exserted from bracts:
4a Bracts 3-5 mm long; perianth tube 10-13 mm long; capsules ovoid, 4—5 mm long; plants of the Cold Bokkeveld, mountains
around Ceres, and Piketberg 2. I intermedius
4b Bracts (5-)6-8 mm long; perianth tube 20-30 mm long; plants from Grootwinterhoek to Riviersonderend Mtns and Kogelberg:
5a Leaves ± falcate, lowermost mostly 3-7 mm wide and usually much shorter than stem, with evident pseudomidrib but without
evident secondary veins, the pseudomidrib raised when dry but secondary veins never raised; perianth magenta or deep pink,
anthers pale yellow; filaments 3^1 mm long; capsules flask-shaped, 6-8 mm long 4. 71 minutus
5b Leaves linear, lowermost 2. 5-2. 8 mm wide and mostly longer than stem, with main and secondary veins raised when dry; peri-
anth and anthers purple; filaments 6-8 mm long; capsules unknown 3. 71 montanus
lb Bracts longer, (7— )8— 1 5 mm long, with prominently raised, closely set veins (sect. Thereianthus):
6a Leaves leathery without strongly raised veins; perianth tube curved and flowers thus ± nodding; filaments declinate, 6-10 mm long
(ser. Bracteolatus):
la Stem developing cluster of large cormels in axil of lowest leaf; leaves linear with evident veins; perianth tube 7-9 mm long; tepals
pale to mid-blue with white markings at base, veins not mottled, lateral longitudinal veins with numerous branches in distal half;
filaments 6-8 mm long 6. 71 bulbiferus
7b Stem without cormels; leaves terete or elliptic in section, without evident veins; perianth tube (7 — )8 — 1 0( — 1 5 ) mm long; tepals purple
to violet with prominent, darkly mottled veins, lateral longitudinal veins mostly without branches in distal half; filaments 8—10
mm long 7. T. bracteolatus
6b Leaves striate or corrugate with strongly raised veins; perianth tube straight or slightly curved distally and flowers thus suberect; fila-
ments central or arcuate, 3-5 mm long (ser. Thereianthus):
8a Perianth tube 25^40 mm long, > twice as long as tepals 1 1. 71 longicollis
8b Perianth tube 7-25 mm long, < twice as long as tepals:
9a Perianth tube filiform, tightly clasping style for most of length and then abruptly dilated at mouth; filaments central, symmetrical
and completely exposed, blocking mouth of perianth tube 9.T. ixioides
246
Bothalia 4 1 ,2 (2011)
9b Perianth tube narrowly funnel-shaped or ± cylindrical, not tightly clasping style; filaments arcuate, included within upper part of
tube and not blocking mouth:
10a Flowers usually blue, rarely white or pink, lower three tepals with white markings near base outlined distally with dark blue
chevron; tepals lanceolate, 3-5 mm wide 8. 71 spicatus
10b Flowers pale flesh-pink with purple tube, lower three tepals marked with purple in basal half; tepals linear, 1. 5-3.0 mm wide
10. T. elandsmontanus
species, Thereianthus juncifolius and T. minutus, grow in
seepages and along streams.
Sect. Brevibracteae Goldblatl & J.C. Manning,
sect. nov.
Plantae foliis filiformibus teretibusque vel line-
ari-falcatis planisque, cum vel sine nervo principali
prominenti sed nunquam fortiter nervatis marginibus
non incrassatisque; bracteis brevibus, 3-8 mm longis
uniformiter coriaceis vel modice mollibus sine costis
prominentibus; seminibus (ubi cognitis) ellipsoideo-fusi-
formibus cum appendice chalazae gracili vel filiformi,
rubro-brunneis, testa longitudinaliter rugosa vel obscure
scalariformi; grano pollinis operculo ± 2-vittato, exinio
perforato vel reticulato.
Type species: T. racemosus (Klatt) G.J. Lewis.
Leaves filiform and terete, or linear to falcate and
plane, with or without prominent main vein but never
strongly ribbed; bracts short, 3-8 mm long, uniformly
leathery or moderately soft-textured, without prominent
veins. Pollen operculum ± 2-banded, exine perforate
or reticulate. Seeds (where known) ellipsoid-fusiform
with filiform or thread-like chalazal extension, red-
dish brown, testa sculpturing longitudinally rugose or
obscurely scalariform.
I . Thereianthus racemosus (Klatt) G.J. Lewis
in Journal of South African Botany 7: 36 (1941).
Watsonia racemosa Klatt 15: 354 (1882). Type: South
Africa, [Western Cape], ‘in montibus ad Vier en Twin-
tig Rivieren’, Dec. without year, Zevher 1609 (B, holo.;
BOL!, GRA, K (2 sheets)!, PRE, SAM (3 sheets)!, iso.).
Plants 130-250 mm high. Conn globose, ± 10 mm
diam.; tunics of moderately fine-textured to coarsely net-
ted fibres, sometimes forming short neck. Cataphylls dry
and papery, reddish brown. Stem erect or flexed slightly
outward above sheath of second leaf, unbranched or
very rarely with short branch from upper leaf axil, 0.8-
1.0 mm diam. below spike. Leaves (3)4(5), lowermost
inserted below ground, blade reaching base of spike
or not, drying from tip at flowering, linear or falcate,
60—1 30(— 1 90) x l-3(-4) mm, thick-textured, plane with
main vein not thickened or raised when fresh and usu-
ally without evident secondary veins, rarely with 1 sec-
ondary vein visible on each side, upper 3 leaves cauline
with lower 2 inserted on lower 'A of stem, sheathing for
'A to 2A length with blades 20-40 mm long, uppermost
leaf entirely sheathing, well separated from spike, all
sheaths shortly imbricate or uppermost a little distant.
Spike erect, moderately densely 5-25-flowered; bracts
shortly imbricate, outer 3-5 mm long, up to 1 internode
long, acute, green below or entirely brown and leathery
with narrow membranous margins and papery tip, with-
out evident veining, inner ± as long or slightly longer,
notched apical ly, ± membranous with narrow brown
zone along veins. Flowers suberect, pale blue, lower
three tepals white at base with purple median chevron
in lower 'A, strongly honey-scented; perianth sub-actin-
omorphic, funnel-shaped; tube straight, 1.0-1. 5 mm
long, narrowly funnel-shaped, included in bract; tepals
elliptical-oblanceolate, subequal, spreading and slightly
cupped, 7-9 x 3_4 mm. Stamens unilateral but later-
als slightly spreading; filaments arcuate, 3-4 mm long,
exserted 1.5-2. 5 mm from tube; anthers 4-5 mm long,
dark blue; pollen pale blue. Ovary ovoid, ± 2 mm long;
style arching over stamens, dividing between base and
middle of anthers, branches 2. 0-2. 5 mm long, divided
for ± V2 their length. Capsules ovoid, 4-5 x 2. 5-3.0 mm.
Seeds ovoid, ± 1 mm long, with ± straight, thread-like
chalazal extension ± 0.5 mm long, reddish brown. Flow-
ering time'. Dec. Figure 4.
Distribution and ecology. Thereianthus racemosus
appears to be restricted to the Voorberg (also known as
the Twenty Four Rivers Mtns) above Porterville (Figure
5), where it occurs on seasonally moist or marshy, sandy
flats in restioid communities. Most collections are from
the Suurvlakte in the Grootwinterhoek Wilderness Area.
It is an obligate pyrophyte, flowering only in the sum-
mer following a bum.
The short-tubed, pale blue flowers are strongly honey-
scented and are evidently adapted to a variety of short-
tongued pollinators, including various Hymenoptera, Lep-
idoptera, and Coleoptera. Goldblatt et al. (1998) reported
pollination of T. racemosus by the hopbine beetle, Khoina
bilatera/is, in the Grootwinterhoek Wilderness area.
Diagnosis and relationships', the short floral bracts,
3-5 mm long, and the very short perianth tube, 1.0-1. 5
mm long, and well included within the bracts, are diag-
nostic for the species. Uniquely for the genus, the flow-
ers are fragrant and strongly honey-scented. The narrow,
leathery leaves with ± distinct main vein but usually
without evident secondary veins, the very short cap-
sules, small seeds, 1.0-1. 5 mm long, and reticulate pol-
len exine suggest that the species is most closely allied
to Thereianthus intermedius from the Cold Bokkeveld.
That species has darker blue flowers with a much longer
perianth tube, 10-13 mm long, and seeds with the chala-
zal extension longer than the seed body.
History, the species was first collected by botani-
cal collector Carl Ludwig Zeyher, who was active in
the Western Cape in the first half of the nineteenth cen-
tury. Although the type collection is not dated, Zeyher
appears to have collected on the Twenty Four Rivers
Mtns only once, in 1831, when he made a rich haul of
specimens from the mountains around Tulbagh in the
company of his sometime partner Christian Frederick
Ecklon (Glen & Germishuizen 2010), and the species
was probably discovered then. It has since been col-
lected just a handful of times on the same mountains,
always following veld fires.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
247
FIGURE 4. — Thereianthus racemosus. A-D, Goldblatt 10454: A, whole
plant; B, flower, front view; C, flower, side view; D, details of sta-
mens and stigma. E, F, Manning 3289 : E, capsule; F, seed. Scale bar:
A-C, 10 mm; D, 3 mm; E, 2 mm; F, 0.5 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Twenty Four Rivers Mtns
above Porterville, (-AA), 16 Dec. 1949, Esterhuysen 16620 (BOL);
16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° 28°
FIGURE 5. — Known distribution of Thereianthus racemosus, •; T.
intermedius, O.
Groot Winterhoek Wilderness Area, (-AA), 14 Dec. 1995, Steiner
3061 (NBG); near Groot Winterhoek Forest Station, (-AA), 27 Dec.
1995, Goldblatt 10454 (MO, NBG); Grootwinterhoek Wilderness
Area, Suurvlakte, (-AA), 8 Jan. 2010 (fr.). Manning 3289 (NBG).
2. Thereianthus intermedius J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt, nom. et stat. nov., T. lapeyrousioides var. ela-
tior G.J. Lewis in Journal of South African Botany 7: 38
(1941). Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], Ceres Hills,
Jan. 1892, L. Guthrie 2208 (BOL, holo.!).
Plants 200-350 mm high. Corm globose, ± 10 mm
diam.; tunics of fine-textured, netted fibres accumulating
with age and forming neck around base of stem. Cata-
phylls dry and papery, reddish brown. Stem erect, flexed
slightly outward above sheath of second leaf, unbranched,
1.0-1. 5 mm diam. below spike. Leaves (3)4, lowermost
inserted below ground, blade reaching base of spike or not,
drying from tip at flowering, linear, 70-150 x 2-3 mm,
thick-textured, with main vein ± evident but not thick-
ened or raised when fresh, plus a pair of secondary veins,
upper (2)3 leaves cauline with lowermost (1)2 inserted on
lower xh of stem, sheathing for V2 to 2h length with blades
30-60 mm long, uppermost leaf entirely sheathing or with
short blade up to 20 mm long, well separated from spike,
all sheaths shortly imbricate or uppermost a little distant.
Spike erect, moderately densely 12-40-flowered; bracts
not or scarcely imbricate, outer 3-5 mm long, up to 1
intemode long, obtuse, brown and leathery with narrow
membranous margins, without evident veining, inner ±
as long or slightly longer, notched apically but sometimes
splitting to base after fertilization by enlarging capsule, ±
membranous with narrow brown zone along veins. Flow-
ers suberect, violet (rarely pale blue), lower three tepals
whitish at base with purple or dark blue median chevron
in lower 'A; perianth subactinomorphic; tube straight or
slightly arching in upper ± 3 mm, 10-13 mm long, cylin-
drical and widening slightly in upper ± 3 mm; tepals nar-
rowly oblanceolate, subequal, spreading and slightly
cupped. 10-11 x 3. 0-3. 5 mm. Stamens unilateral; filaments
erect, ± 7 mm long, exserted ± 4 mm from tube; anthers
purple, 4—5 mm long; pollen violet. Ovary ovoid, 2. 0-2. 5
mm long; style arching over stamens, dividing below base
of anthers, branches ± 2.5 mm long, divided for ± V2 their
length. Capsules ovoid, 4-5 x 3-4 mm. Seeds ovoid, ± 1.5
x 1 .0 mm, with thread-like chalazal extension up to 3 mm
long abruptly reflexed from near middle, reddish brown,
testa striate-rugulose. Flowering time : Dec. Figure 6A-F.
248
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
Distribution and biology: originally recorded from 1941 ), Thereianthus intermedins has now also been col-
two nnlocalized collections made near Ceres (Lewis lected in the Cold Bokkeveld at the headwaters of the
FIGURE 6. — A-F: Thereianthus intermedins, Hanekom & Tilney s.n. A, whole plant; B, half flower; C, outer bract; D, inner bract; E, capsule; F,
seeds. G-J: T. montanus, Oliver 12197. G, whole plant; H, flower, front view; I, half flower; J, outer (left) and inner (right) bracts. Scale bars:
A, B, G-J, 10 mm; C-E, 2 mm; F, 0.5 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Bothalia 41 ,2 (201 1 )
249
Olifants River and at high elevations on Zebrakop in the
Piketberg (Figure 5). In the north it has been collected
from the farms Elandskloof and Kunje along the eastern
foot of the Cold Bokkeveld Mtns, with another collec-
tion from Visgat on the western edge of the Skurweberg,
and in the south from Castle Rocks at the western edge
of the Hex River Mtns above Ceres. It is restricted to
seasonally waterlogged or marshy, sandy flats dominated
by restioids, between ± 500 and 1 000 m, and flowers
only after fire.
We assume that the moderately long-tubed flowers
are pollinated by various long-tongued insects, including
anthophorine bees (Apidae: Anthophorinae) and butter-
flies.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus interme-
dins is recognized by its linear leaves, 2-3 mm wide,
elongate spike with short floral bracts, 3-5 mm long, and
violet (pale blue on Piketberg) flowers with moderately
long floral tubes, 10-13 mm long, and slightly longer
than the tepals. The leaves have an additional pair of
secondary veins, one running on each side of the central
vein close to the leaf margin, and the spike is moderately
dense, with the bracts shorter than or scarcely as long
as the intemodes. The small, ovoid capsules, 4-5 mm
long, contain distinctive seeds, with an ovoid seed body
and long, thread-like chalazal extension ± twice as long
as the seed body and sharply bent backwards along the
length of the seed.
Thereianthus intermedins is most likely to be con-
fused with T. minutus, which has similar plane leaves
(but with the pseudomidrib much less distinct), short
bracts, and long-tubed flowers. It differs most obviously
from T. minutus in its purple or blue (vs magenta or deep
pink) flowers with a shorter floral tube (10-13 mm vs
20-30 mm), shorter bracts (3-5 mm vs 6-8 mm) and in
its smaller capsules (ovoid and 4-5 mm long vs flask-
shaped and 6-8 mm long) capsules containing ovoid
(vs fusiform) seeds. The distribution of the two species
is complementary, with T. intermedins ranging from the
Cold Bokkeveld to the Skurweberg, the western Hex
River Mtns and Piketberg (Figure 5), and T. minutus dis-
tributed from the Grootwinterhoek Mtns above Tulbagh
through the Franschhoek and Du Toitskloof Mtns to the
Kogelberg and western end of the Riviersonderend Mtns
(Figure 7).
16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° 28°
FIGURE 7. — Known distribution of Thereianthus minutus , •; T. mon-
tanus, O.
History', the species seems to have been first col-
lected by botanist Louise Guthrie in January 1892, and
has been recorded only sporadically since then, most
recently by local landowner Louis Hanekom, who
noticed it flowering for the first time on his Farm Kunje
in Dec. 2009 after the extensive wildfire that swept the
area in the summer of 2008/09. He passed the plants on
to Jeanetta Tilney, who has been documenting the spe-
cies on her property on Middelberg Pass for some years
and who in turn brought it to our attention.
Thereianthus intermedins was first described as var.
elatior of T. lapeyrousioides [now T. minutus (Klatt)
G.J. Lewis (Goldblatt 1989)], distinguished from the
typical variety by its taller stature (240^160 mm high),
slightly longer, narrower leaves, and longer, more flor-
iferous (12-40-flowered) spike with shorter bracts ± 5
mm long (Lewis 1941 ). Subsequently, Manning & Gold-
blatt (2004) argued that collections of T. minutus from
Bainskloof displayed the full range of variation in these
features and concluded that var. elatior could not be rec-
ognized at any taxonomic level. The recent collection of
fresh material of the plants from the Farm Kunje shows
that we were wrong and that other, more significant dif-
ferences not identified by Lewis (1941) exist between
the two taxa, justifying their recognition as distinct spe-
cies. These include perianth colour, floral tube length,
shape and size of the capsule, seed shape and pollen
exine sculpturing.
Etymology : Thereianthus intermedins approaches T.
minutus in its seeds with filiform chalazal extension but
resembles T. racemosus in its short capsules and reticu-
late pollen sculpturing, and we thus propose the name T.
intermedins in recognition of its somewhat intermediate
character.
Additional specimens seen
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg, SW slopes of
Zebrakop, (DA-DB). 4 Jan. 1995, Goldblatt & Manning 10168 (MO).
3219 (Wuppertal): Elandskloof, marshy places, 3000' [915 m], (-CA),
18 Dec. 1948, Levyns 9349 (BOL). 3319 (Worcester): Visgat, upper
Olifants River Valley, (-AA), 28 Dec. 1946, Esterhuysen 13435 (BOL,
NBG, PRE); Ceres, 1700' [518 m], (-AD), Jan. 1903, Bolus 8342
(BOL, PRE); Ceres, (-AD), Jan. 1929, Thode A2287 (NBG, PRE);
Ceres, (-AD), Jan. 1932, Leslie s.n. NBG46/32 (BOL); Ceres, Castle
Rocks, vlakte [flats] on NE slopes, abundant after fire, 3800' [1 158
m], (-AD), 14 Jan. 1960, Esterhuysen 28430 (BOL, MO).
3. Thereianthus montanus J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt in Bothalia 34: 103 (2004). Type: South Africa,
Western Cape, Riviersonderend, Pilaarkop, ridge WNW
of peak, 31 Jan. 2004, E.G.H. Oliver 12197 (NBG,
holo.!; MO, iso.!).
Plants 200-350 mm high. Conn globose, 7-10 mm
diam.; tunics of fine-textured, netted fibres accumulat-
ing with age and forming neck around base of stem.
Stem erect, flexed outward above sheath of second leaf,
unbranched, 1.0-1. 5 mm diam. below spike. Cataphylls
dry and papery, reddish brown. Leaves 3 or 4, lower-
most inserted below ground, blade reaching or exceed-
ing spike, linear, 150-300 x 2. 5-2. 8 mm, thick- textured,
with main vein evident but not thickened or raised when
fresh, plus 1 or 2 evident secondary veins on each side,
upper 2 or 3 leaves cauline with lower 1 or 2 inserted on
lower 'A of stem, sheathing for V2 to 2h length with short
250
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
blades 15-25 mm long, uppermost leaf well separated
from spike, short and entirely sheathing, all sheaths dis-
tant. Spike erect, compact, densely 7-10-flowered; bracts
imbricate, outer 6-8 mm long, obtuse to truncate, green
and leathery below, dry and brown in upper V2, ± 2 inter-
nodes long, inner ± 1.5 mm shorter than outer, notched
apically, brown and papery with narrow darker zone
along veins. Flowers suberect, purple, lower three or all
tepals each with spear-shaped, purple median streak near
base, throat and lower part of tube white; perianth sub-
actinomorphic, salver-shaped; tube straight or slightly
arching in upper ± 5 mm, 22-27 x 1.2— 1.5 mm, cylin-
drical and widening slightly in upper ± 5 mm; tepals
spreading and slightly cupped, narrowly elliptical to
lanceolate, subequal, 9-15 x 3. 5-5.0 mm. Stamens uni-
lateral; filaments erect, 6-8 mm long, exserted 3-4 mm
from tube; anthers 4-5 mm long, purple; pollen violet.
Ovary ovoid, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style arching over sta-
mens, dividing between base and middle of anthers,
branches ± 2.5 mm long, divided for ± V2 their length.
Capsules and seeds unknown. Flowering time : late Jan-
Feb. Figure 6G-J.
Distribution and biology: Thereianthus montanus is
known from a single population on steep, south-facing
slopes of Pilaarkop in the Riviersonderend Mtns (Fig-
ure 7). Plants are scattered in moist, loamy soil in short,
grassy fynbos at an altitude of ± 1 500 m.
The long-tubed, violet flowers appear to be adapted
for pollination by long-proboscid flies or butterflies
(Manning & Goldblatt 2004), and accumulate nectar
only in the lower few millimetres, which is consistent
with pollination by long-proboscid insects with mouth-
parts 20-25 mm long.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus montanus
is distinguished by its linear leaves without thickened
or raised main vein when fresh, although the mesophyll
tissue collapses on drying to leave the central and sec-
ondary veins apparently raised in herbarium specimens,
and compact spikes of salver-shaped, purple flowers
with slender perianth tube 22-27 mm long and purple
anthers. It is most likely to be confused with long-tubed
T. minutus with similarly long-tubed flowers and which
has been recorded from the western Riviersonderend
Mtns, but this species is generally shorter, mostly 1 00—
200 mm tall, with a broader, mostly falcate lower leaf,
( 1 .5— )3 .0—7.0 mm wide and rarely reaching the base of
the spike, and with a prominent pseudomidrib but incon-
spicuous secondary veins. On drying, the main vein in
the leaves of T. minutus becomes raised through collapse
of the surrounding blade tissue but the secondary veins
are never pronounced. The flowers in T. minutus are a
distinctive magenta colour, with yellow anthers. Unfor-
tunately fruits and seeds are not known in T. montanus
and so cannot be compared with the distinctive flask-
shaped capsules and fusiform seeds with thread-like
chalazal extension of T. minutus. The two species differ
in pollen exine sculpturing. T. minutus has an unspecial-
ized perforate pollen exine, unlike the unusual reticu-
late pollen exine of T. montanus, which suggests that its
closest allies are actually T. racemosus from Grootwin-
terhoek and T. intermedius from the Cold Bokkeveld,
being the only other two species in the genus with retic-
ulate exine.
History', a single flowering stem of the species was
first collected by botanists Ted and Inge Oliver in Feb-
ruary 1999, and the type material was collected by Ted
Oliver from the same locality five years later, in January
2004.
Additional specimen examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Riviersondered Mtns,
Pilaarkop, ridge WNW of peak, ± 1 500 m, (-BB), 26 Feb. 1999,
E.G.H. <£ I.M. Oliver 11228 (NBG).
4. Thereianthus minutus (Klatt) G.J. Lewis in
Journal of South African Botany 7: 43 (1941). Watsonia
minuta Klatt: 353 (1882). Type: South Africa, [Western
Cape], Tulbagh Waterfall, Ecklon & Zeyher Irid. 189 (B,
lecto.!, designated by Goldblatt 19: 143 (1989); MO!,
S!, SAM!, isolecto.) [Syntype: South Africa, [Western
Cape], Dutoitskloofberge am Wasserfall, Drege 1551 (B
‘Herb. Liibeck’, believed destroyed)].
Watsonia lapeyrousioides Baker: 178 (1892). Thereianthus lap-
eyrousioides (Baker) G.J. Lewis 7: 38 (1941). Type: South Africa,
[Western Cape], clivis montium inter Villiersdorp & French Hoek
[Franschhoek], Nov. 1879, Bolus 5251 (BOL, lecto.!, here designated;
K., isolecto.!) [Syntype: South Africa, [Western Cape], Du Toits-
kloof, without date [‘1840' on specimen], Drege s.n. (K [K3205 1 l]l,
2S\M[SAM21067\\}.
Plants 100-200(-300) mm high. Conn globose, 7-10
mm diam.; tunics of fine-textured, netted fibres, some-
times accumulating with age and forming short neck
around base of stem. Stem usually inclined but flexed
outward above sheath of second leaf and then erect,
unbranched, 0.8-1. 5 mm diam. below spike. Cataphylls
dry and papery, reddish brown. Leaves 3 or 4(— 6), lower-
most inserted below ground, blade mostly much shorter
than spike, rarely exceeding it, mostly falcate, rarely lin-
ear-arcuate, (30-)40-100(-350) x ( 1 .5— )3— 7 mm, thick-
textured, with main vein evident but not raised when
fresh (becoming raised when dry), plus 1 or 2 evident
secondary veins on each side, upper leaves cauline with
lower I or 2 inserted on lower V3 of stem, sheathing for
V2 to 2F length with blades 20^10 mm long, uppermost
leaf well separated from spike, short and entirely sheath-
ing, all sheaths shortly imbricate or distant. Spike erect,
compact, moderately densely (3-)5-10(-20)-flowered;
bracts shortly imbricate, outer (5-)6-8 mm long, obtuse
to truncate, green and leathery below, dry and brown
in upper V2, ± 1.5 internodes long, inner ± 1.0-1. 5 mm
shorter than outer, notched apically, brown and papery
with narrow darker zone along veins. Flowers suberect,
dark pink to magenta, lower three tepals usually with
darker median mark near base, throat white; perianth
subactinomorphic, salver-shaped; tube straight, 20-30 x
1.2-1. 5 mm, widening gradually and evenly from base;
tepals spreading and slightly cupped, elliptical to oblan-
ceolate, subequal, 7-10 x 2^1 mm. Stamens unilateral;
filaments erect, 3^4 mm long, exserted ± 2 mm from
top of tube; anthers 3^4 mm long, pale yellow; pollen
cream-coloured. Ovary ovoid, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style
arching over stamens, dividing just below or just above
base of anthers, branches ± 4 mm long, divided for ± V2
their length. Capsules flask-shaped, 6-8 mm long. Seeds
fusiform, 1 .5-2.0 mm long, with chalazal extension up
to 4 mm long, thus ± twice as long as seed body, sharply
bent back ± midway and hooked or crook-like, some-
times twisting around adjacent seeds, reddish brown.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
251
FIGURE 8. — Thereianthus minutus. A-C, Goldblatl & Manning 9505:
A, whole plant; B, flower, front view; C, flower, side view. D, E,
Manning 3327 : D, capsules; E, seed. Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm: D.
2 mm; E, 0.5 mm. Artist: John Manning.
longitudinally rugulose. Flowering time : Dec.-Jan.,
rarely as early as late Oct. Figure 8.
Distribution and ecology >: endemic to the mountains
in the extreme southwestern part of Western Cape, from
above Porterville southwards to the Kogelberg and
western Riviersonderend Mtns (Figure 7). Thereian-
thus minutus is restricted to moist habitats such as rock
ledges, damp cliffs and streamsides, growing in flushes,
peaty seepages and mossy turf. Fires are necessary for
flowering to occur in plants on deeper, more heavily
vegetated soils but in exposed habitats plants flower reg-
ularly without burning.
The long-tubed, magenta flowers are consistent
with pollination by long-proboscid flies and we have
observed visits to the species by Philoliche rostrata
(Tabanidae) above Tulbagh Waterfall in December 2010.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus minu-
tus is distinguished by its mostly falcate, relatively
broad lower leaf blade, mostly 3-7 mm wide, with a
pronounced main vein, and dark pink to magenta flow-
ers with perianth tube 20-30 mm long. On drying and
in herbarium material the pseudomidrib becomes raised
through collapse of the surrounding mesophyll tissue
but the secondary veins remain inconspicuous. The short
bracts, 5-8 mm long, without prominent veins are typi-
cal of sect. Brevibracteae but the pale yellow anthers are
unusual in the genus and found elsewhere only in T. jun-
cifolius (sect. Brevibracteae) and T. bracteolatus (sect.
Thereianthus). It is most likely to be confused with T.
intermedius and T. montanus, both of which have similar
long-tubed flowers but of the more typical blue to purple
colour and with purple stamens. The three species have
complementary ranges: T. intermedius from the Piket-
berg, Cold Bokkeveld and Skurweberg has a perianth
tube 10-13 mm long, shorter bracts 3-5 mm long, and
smaller, ovoid capsules 4-5 mm long; T. montanus from
the eastern Riviersonderend Mtns has similar bract and
perianth tube dimensions but longer filaments, 6-8 mm
long and exserted 3—4 mm from the tube, and mostly
narrower leaves, 2. 5-2. 8 mm wide, with the main and
also secondary veins becoming raised on drying and
in herbarium material. T. montanus is generally a taller
species, 200-300 mm tall, with the lower leaf longer
than the spike. In addition, the perianth tube in T. mon-
tanus is virtually cylindrical throughout, widening only
in the upper 5 mm, unlike the tube in T. minutus, which
is slightly narrower below but widening gradually and
evenly towards the top.
The fruit and seeds of Thereianthus montanus are
unfortunately not known but the flask-shaped capsules
of T. minutus are distinctive, as are the fusiform seeds
with long, thread-like chalazal extension ± twice as long
as the seed body. The placenta is restricted to the lower
portion of the capsule and the tapered neck or beak
accommodates the chalazal extensions of the seeds.
History'. Thereianthus minutus was first collected by
the botanical collectors Christian Frederick Ecklon and
Carl Ludwig Zeyher at Tulbagh Waterfall, possibly in
1831 when they visited this site (Glen & Germishuizen
2010), and almost contemporaneously by the naturalist
and traveller Carl Drege, who found it in the Du Toitsk-
loof Mtns sometime between 1826 and 1834. The date
1840 marked on the type collection at Kew is not the
date of collection as Drege returned to Europe in 1834
(Glen & Germishuizen 2010), and is probably the date
that the specimen was offered for sale and acquired by
the herbarium. These two collections formed the basis
of both Watsonia minuta Klatt (1882) and W. lapey-
rousioides Baker (1892). At the time of her revision of
Thereianthus, Lewis (1941) had not been able to iden-
tify Klatt’s W. minuta and although she transferred the
name to Thereianthus she treated the taxon as a doubt-
ful species, possibly near T. racemosus, based on Klatt’s
curious and quite mistaken description of the perianth
tube as a mere 4 mm long. She accordingly recognized
T. lapeyrousioides as a separate species. Ironically, and
quite inexplicably, she overlooked the significance of
the Ecklon & Zeyher 189 syntype of W. minuta at SAM,
which she cited under T. lapeyrousioides and which
would have established the identity of Klatt’s species. It
was left to Goldblatt (1989) to recognize that this was
the earliest name for the species.
The Ecklon & Zeyher collections were distributed
under the unpublished name Beilia triticea Eckl. (now
applied to Thereianthus bracteolatus), while the Drege
material was misidentified as Anomatheca juncea (Ker
Gawl.) Ker Gawl. (= Freesia verrucosa). Plants from the
Cold Bokkeveld, treated by Lewis (1941) as T. lapey-
252
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1)
rousioides var. elatior G.J. Lewis, are recognized here as
a distinct species, T. intermedins.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Jonkershoek Mtns, (—
DD). 1826, Marloth s.n. (PRE); Jan. 1888, 'Mar loth s.n. (NBG); Jonk-
ershoek State Forest, Stellenboschberg, (-DD), 8 Dec. 1975, Haynes
1180 (NBG); Stellenbosch. Swartboskloof, (-DD), 25 Oct. 1960,
Van der Merwe 23-94 (NBG, PRE). 3319 (Worcester): Winterhoeks-
berg, (-AA), Nov., Ecklon & Zevher Irid. 188 (72.11) (MO); Tulbagh,
Watervalsberge, east of Suurvlakte Falls, (-AC), 29 Dec. 2000, Hans-
ford 22 (NBG); lower Wellington Sneeukop, (-CA), 23 Dec. 1945,
Esterhuysen 1254 (BOL); Bain’s Kloof [Bainskloof], (-CA), 12 Nov.
1896, Schlechter 9126 (BOL, MO, PRE); 28 Nov. 1926, Grant 2648
(BOL, MO); 27 Nov. 1939, Bond 5 (NBG); 17 Jan. 1945, Compton
16922 (NBG); 9 Nov. 1946, Compton 18682 (NBG); 6 Nov. 1948,
Acocks 15238 PRE); Nov. 1949, Stokoe s.n. SAM60115 (SAM); Dec.
1957, Loubser 866 (NBG); 24 Nov. 1979, Goldblatt 5221 (PRE); 27
Nov. 1990, Steiner 2265 (MO, NBG); Baviaanskloof, above pools in
middle of valley, (-CA), 12 Jan. 1993, Goldblatt & Manning 9505
(MO); (-CA), 15 Jan. 2011 [fruiting]. Manning 3327 (NBG); Wolwek-
loof Forest Reserve, (-CA), 20 Oct. 1946, Barker 4249 (NBG); Lim-
ietberg, (-CA), 28 Nov. 1982, Esterhuysen 35830 (MO, PRE), Jackson
s.n. (NBG); Slanghoek Mtns, Witte River Valley, (-CA), Nov. 1922,
Thorne SAM46563 (SAM), 21 Nov. 1943, Wasserfall 614 (NBG), 28
Dec. 1975, Esterhuysen s.n. (MO); Du Toit's Kloof, (-CA), Jan. 1880,
Bolus 5497 (BOL); 10 Dec. 1945, Esterhuysen 12369 (BOL); Dec.
1949, Stokoe s.n. (NBG, SAM60114); Rawsonville, veld opposite
Farm Gevonden, (-CA), 3 Nov. 1962, Walters 912 (NBG); Du Toit-
skloof Mtns, Elandsberg catchment, (-CC), 29 Dec. 2000, Low 6770
(NBG); Slanghoek Valley, The Cossacks, (-CC), 16 Dec. 1997, Oliver
11004 (NBG); Paarl, Haalhoek Spitzkop, (-CC), 2 Jan. 1947, Ester-
huysen 13528 (BOL, NBG), 19 Dec. 1981 Esterhuysen 35731 (BOL,
MO); Wemmershoek area, Klein Drakenstein Mtns above Zachari-
ashoek, (-CC), 1 Jan. 1983, Oliver 7928 (NBG, PRE); French Hoek
[Franschhoek], (-CC), 23 Dec. 1895, Bolus 4010 (MO, NBG, PRE),
Jan. 1949, Stokoe s.n. SAM60178 (SAM); Franschhoek Pass, Adolph's
Kop, (-CC), 15 Dec. 1944, Esterhuysen 11047 (BOL, PRE); western
Riviersonderend Mtns, 26.4 km west of Olifantsberg, (-CD), 18 Dec.
2007, Helme 5172 (NBG). 3418 (Simonstown): Jonkershoek Valley,
near top of Kurktrekker, (-BB), 1 Dec. 1989, Oliver 9352 (NBG);
Kogelberg Forest Reserve, near Rooiels, (-BD), 1 1 Nov. 1952, Rycroft
1354 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Villiersdorp, (-AB), 23 Nov. 1930, Nel
s.n. (NBG).
5. Thereianthus juncifolius (Baker) G.J. Lewis
in Journal of South African Botany 7; 37 (1941). Mor-
phixia juncifolia Baker: 238 (1876a). Watsonia jun-
cifolia (Baker) Baker: 178 (1892). Freesia juncifolia
(Baker) Klatt in T.A. Durand & Schinz 5: 188 (1894).
Lapeirousia juncifolia (Baker) N.E.Br.: 194 (1931).
Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], without precise
locality or date, [Piquetberg Div. fide Baker (1896)],
Zeyher 1619 (K [K320516 ex herb. Wallich ], lecto.!,
here designated; BOL!, K (3 sheets)!, S!, SAM! (2
sheets), isolecto.) [The Herb. Wallich duplicate is
selected as lectotype from among four duplicates at
Kew as having been available to Baker at the time and
as bearing the inscriptions ‘ Morph ixia juncifolia Baker’
and ‘Type’].
Anomatheca calamifolia Klatt: 355 (1882), nom. superfl. pro Mor-
phixia juncifolia Baker (1876b). Type: South Africa, [Western Cape],
Twenty Four Rivers, Zeyher [as Drege] 1619 (S, 'Herb. Klatt', holo.l;
BOL!, K (3 sheets)!, S!, SAM (2 sheets)!, iso.).
Ixia zeyheri Baker: 166 (1892), nom. superfl. pro Morphixia jun-
cifolia Baker (1876a) [based on the same type]. Type: South Africa,
[Western Cape], without precise locality or date, Zeyher 1619 (K
[K320516 ex herb. Wallich ], lecto.!, here designated; BOL!, K (3
sheets)!, S!, SAM (2 sheets)!, isolecto.).
Slender plants 1 20-200(-300) mm high. Corm glo-
bose, 5-10 mm diam.; tunics of fine-textured, netted
fibres, accumulating with age and forming thick neck up
to 60 mm long around base of stem. Stem flexed outward
above sheath of second leaf and then erect, unbranched
or rarely with short branch from axil of uppermost
scale-leaf, 0. 5-1.0 mm diam. below spike. Cataphylls
dry and papery, reddish brown, uppermost long and
reaching to lower leaf blade. Leaves (3)4, lowermost
inserted below ground, blade mostly reaching to spike
or exceeding it, filiform-terete, 150-500 x 0.5-1. 5 mm,
thick-textured, striate with slightly raised veins when
dry, upper leaves cauline with lower 1 or 2 inserted on
lower V3 of stem and mostly imbricate with lowermost
sheathing for < V2 length with blades (20-)40-100 mm
long, uppermost 1 or 2 leaves scale-like and entirely
sheathing, inserted ± midway between foliage leaves and
spike and well separated from spike. Spike erect, elon-
gate, laxly (2)3-1 0-flowered, lower internodes 3— 5(— 7)
x longer than bracts but progressively shorter acro-
petally and uppermost internodes ± as long as bracts;
bracts not imbricate, outer 3-5 mm long, acute to trun-
cate, soft-textured and green with papery brown tips,
inner slightly longer than outer and similar in texture,
acute or truncate. Flowers suberect, purple to lilac with
white throat; perianth actinomorphic, salver-shaped;
tube straight, 11-18 mm long, widening gradually and
evenly from base, 1.0-1. 5 mm diam. at mouth; tepals
spreading and slightly cupped, ovate or obovate, sub-
equal, 10-15 x 3. 5-6.0 mm. Stamens central; filaments
erect, 4-6 mm long, exserted 3-4 mm from tube; anthers
3-4 mm long, lilac or pale yellow; pollen lilac or cream-
coloured. Ovaty ovoid, ± 1 .5 mm long; style central,
dividing between base and middle of anthers, branches
± 3 mm long, divided for > V2 their length, spreading or
recurved. Capsules flask-shaped, 9-15 mm long. Seeds
fusiform, 6-7 mm long, with chalazal thread ± 13 mm
long, thus ± twice as long as seed body, sharply bent
back ± midway and hooked or crook-like, sometimes
twisting around adjacent seeds, reddish brown, longitu-
dinally rugulose. Flowering time : Dec.-Feb., rarely to
Mar. Figure 9.
Distribution and ecology, a mainly montane spe-
cies occurring from the southern Cedarberg through the
Olifants River Mtns to the Skurweberg north of Ceres,
with a disjunction to the Hottentots Holland, Kogelberg
and Klein River Mtns in the south, and also recorded on
the lower southern slopes of the Riviersonderend Mtns
(Figure 10). The species is thus apparently absent from
the mountains between Ceres and Stellenbosch. Plants
are restricted to seeps, streamsides, drainage lines and
marshy ground, and may be locally abundant, mostly
between 500 and 1 000 m but to near sea level along
coastal ranges. The leaves are still green and fresh at
flowering. As in most species in the genus, flowering is
stimulated by fire.
The long-tubed, salver-shaped, purple flowers sug-
gest pollination by long-proboscid flies, possibly Bom-
byliidae or Tabanidae, and butterflies but we have not
observed any visits.
Diagnosis and relationships', one of the most distinc-
tive members of the genus, Thereianthus juncifolius is
characterized by its slender habit, filiform-terete leaves,
0.5- 1.5 mm diam., and very lax spike of salver-shaped,
purple flowers with slender tube 11-18 mm long and
ovate-obovate tepals. The lower flowers are well sepa-
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
253
FIGURE 9. — Thereianthus juncifo-
lius. Manning 3329. A, whole
plant; B, outer bract; C, inner
bract; D, capsules; E, seed.
Scale bar: A, 10 mm; B-D, 2
mm; E, 0.5 mm. Artist: John
Manning.
254
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 10. — Known distribution of Thereianthus juncifolius, •.
rated from one another by internodes three to five times
longer than the bracts. The species is also distinctive in
its bracts, the inner as long as or slightly longer than
and similar in texture to the outer, both soft-textured
and green throughout except for the brown, papery tips.
In all other species the inner bracts are shorter than the
outer and membranous or papery except along the veins.
The capsules are markedly flask-shaped with a narrow,
tapering neck and fusiform seeds with a long, filiform
chalazal extension ± twice as long as the seed body. The
placenta is restricted to the lower portion of the capsule
and the tapered neck or beak accommodates the chalazal
extensions of the seeds, which extend up the neck of the
capsule to the apex and then flex sharply back towards
the seed body. This combination of unusual characteris-
tics sets the species apart from others in the genus but
the flask-shaped capsules and the seeds with long, fili-
form chalazal extensions indicate a close alliance with T.
minutus.
History, the unusual morphology of the species
caused a great deal of uncertainty about its generic posi-
tion among early workers. The lax spike and salver-
shaped flowers determined its initial description in the
genus Morphixia (Baker 1876a) but the subsequent
realization of the taxonomic importance of divided style
branches encouraged various authors to place it in all
possible genera with this character, namely Watsonia
(Baker 1892), Freesia (Klatt 1894) and Lapeirousia
(Brown 1931). Although Baker (1892) initially misun-
derstood the affinities of Thereianthus juncifolius , he
rapidly appreciated its relationship to other species in
the genus by including it with them in subgen. Beilia
of Watsonia. His simultaneous redescription of the spe-
cies as Ixia zeyheri , based on the same collection, is best
viewed as an aberration since none of the herbarium
material seen by him bears this name. Klatt’s (1882)
independent description of the species in the genus Ano-
matheca Ker Gawk, again based on the same collection
by Zeyher, anticipates his later inclusion of that genus in
Freesia.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE.— 3219 (Wuppertal): S Cedarberg, Sneeuberg,
(-AC), I Mar. 1947, Esterhuysen 13842 (BOL); Algeria Forest Station,
Sneeuberg, 4200-4800' [1 280-1 460 m], (-AC), 5 Feb. 1982, Viviers
121 (NBG); Apollo Mtn., Kromrivier Valley, 1 340 m, (-AC), 24 Jan.
1986, Taylor 11482 (NBG); Elandskloof, Hexberg slopes, marshy site,
(-CA), 12 Dec. 1982, Esterhuysen 35847 A (MO); Keerom, E foot of
Twenty Four River Mtns [Olifantsrivierberge], (-CC), 3 Dec. 1950,
Esterhuysen 17863 (BOL, NBG); Grootfontein, next to Ratelrivier, (-
CC), 12 Dec. 1982, Van Zyl 2418 (NBG); Koue Bokkeveld, Skoonge-
sig, Fonteinbult, (-CC), 29 Dec. 1978, Hanekom 25 73 (MO, PRE);
Grootwinterhoek Forest Station, rocky flats, along stream, (-CC), 27
Dec. 1995, Goldblatt 10455 (MO); 3319 (Worcester): mtns near Por-
terville, (-AA), Nov. 1912, Edwards s.n. BOL16150 (BOL); Groot
Winterhoek Forestry Station, 650 m, (-AA), 2 Dec. 1983, De Kock 52
(NBG); Groot Winterhoek, road to De Tronk at Groot Kliphuis river
crossing, (-AA), 10 Dec. 2007, Helme 5091 (NBG); eastern slopes of
Witsenbergen, (-AA), Dec. 1919, Andreae 178 (NBG); Skurfdeber-
gen near Wagensboom River, (-AB), 27 Jan. 1897, Schlechter 10169
(BOL); Schurfteberg Pass, (-AB), 20 Dec. 1944, Compton 16799
(NBG). ‘Worcester, beim Waterfall,’ (-AC), Dec. Ecklon & Zeyher
hid. 297 (1.12) (MO). 3418 (Simonstown): margins of streams flow-
ing into Buffels River near Pringle Bay, (-BD), 27 Jan. 1936, Pillans
8185 (BOL); Betty's Bay, (-BD), 10 Feb. 1956, Levyns 10451 (BOL);
marsh on mtns behind Rooiels-Stalberg-Pringle E Peak, (-BD), 10
Jan. 1971, Esterhuysen 32561 (BOL, MO); Kogelberg, (-BD), 16
Jan. 1944, Esterhuysen 10010 (BOL); mtns north of Palmiet River
Mouth, (-BD), 26 Jan. 1947, Esterhuysen 13667 (BOL, NBG); mtns
above Betty’s Bay, marshy slopes in valley at base of Platberg, (-BD)
27 Jan. 1980, Esterhuysen 35387 (BOL, MO); Kogelberg State Forest,
Oudebosch, 80 m, (-BD), 20 Jan. 1992, Kruger 302 (MO, NBG). 3419
(Caledon): Hottentots Holland Mtns, east of Landdroskop Hut, (-AA),
6 Jan. 2000, Oliver & Oliver 11470 (NBG); Grabouw, (-AA), Jan.
1943, Stokoe s.n. SAM55716 (SAM); Nuweberg Forest Reserve, slopes
of Landdrost kop, damp gully above path to Somerset Sneeukop, (-
AA), 11 Jan. 1987 Goldblatt 8351 (MO); Aries Kraal, (-AA), 1 Jan.
1945, Compton 16851 (NBG); Lebanon, (-AA), Jan. 1968, Kruger
640 (NBG); Highlands Forest Reserve, hiking trail, marshy places, (—
AC), 29 Jan. 1987 Goldblatt 8469 (MO); summit of Klein River Mtns,
Bellevue, (-AD), 2 Feb. 2008, Helme 5322 (NBG); Vogelgat, N of
Mt Frustration, (-AD), 1 Mar. 1987, Williams 3785 (NBG); Vogelgat,
Rock-in-the-Path, (-AD), 1 Feb. 1986, Williams 3643 (NBG); Her-
manus, Femkloof Nature Reserve, 400’ [122 m] (-AD), 21 Jan. 1981,
Orchard 583 (MO); Greyton, foot of Riviersonderend Mtns, (-CA), 16
Jan. 1988, Oakes s.n. (NBG).
Sect. Thereianthus
Leaves linear or falcate, plane and either leathery
without raised veins or strongly ribbed or corrugate with
prominently raised veins, or ellipsoid in section; bracts
(7— )8— 1 5 mm long, closely and prominently veined with
raised veins (sclerenchymatous phloem caps prominent).
Pollen operculum 1 -banded, exine perforate. Seeds
(where known) ellipsoid-ovoid and angled, without
chalazal extension, brown to blackish.
Ser. Bracteolatus J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , ser.
nov.
Lamina foliorum non costata nec corrugata sine
nervis prominentibus vel incrassatis, floribus actinomor-
phis tepalis patentibus et tubo curvato, staminibus ± dec-
linatis.
Type species: Thereianthus bracteolatus (Lam.)
G.J. Lewis.
6. Thereianthus bulbiferus Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, sp. nov.
Plantae 140-200 mm altae, cormo globoso 10-15 mm
diam., tunicis fibrosis crassis interdum infra unguiscen-
tibus, caule usitate eramoso cormelos 5-7 in axilla folii
infimi facienti, foliis 4, infimo lineari-falcato, 70-120
x ( 1 .5— )2— 3 mm, coriaceis, spica erecta dense 7- ad
1 5-flora, bracteis breviter imbricatis, bractea externa
7— 9(— 1 0) mm longa interna quam Ji ad 3A plo breviore,
floribus coeruleis tepalis inferioribus prope basin nota
alba mediana munitis, perianthio actinomorpho, tubo
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
255
7-9 mm longo infundibuliformi, tepalis subaequalibus
vel interioribus pauce latioribus oblanceolatis patentibus
parum cupulatis (10-) 13-20 x 3-6 mm, staminibus ±
declinatis, filamentis 6-8 mm longis ± 5-6 mm ex tubo
exsertis, antheris 4 mm longis purpureis, ramis styli pro-
funde furcatis 3-5 mm longis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Bo-Her-
mon, Elandsberg Nature Reserve, alluvial flats near
river, after fire, (-AC), 7 Nov. 2010, J.C. Manning 3312
(NBG, holo.; MO, iso.).
Plants 140-200 mm high. Corm globose, 10-15 mm
diam.; tunics of coarsely netted fibres, sometimes form-
ing claws below, accumulating with age and forming
short neck around base of stem. Stem erect, flexuous or
flexed outward only above sheath of second leaf, usu-
ally unbranched, rarely with short branch from upper
leaf axil, 2. 0-2. 5 mm diam. below spike, developing
conspicuous cluster of 5-7 cormels, each 3^1 mm diam.,
in axil of lowest leaf. Cataphylls dry and papery, red-
dish brown. Leaves 4, lowermost inserted below ground,
blade reaching base of spike or not, ± dry at flower-
ing, linear-falcate, often sinuous-twisted, 70-120 x
( 1 .5— )2— 3 mm, leathery, with 3 ± equally distinct veins
or with main vein slightly more distinct, not thickened
or raised when fresh but prominent when dry, upper 3
leaves cauline with lower 2 inserted on lower V3 of stem
and sheathing for ± V2 length, sheaths shortly imbricate,
blades 50-70 x 3^) mm, uppermost leaf a little distant
from lower leaves and well separated from spike, usu-
ally with short blade 20-50 mm long, rarely almost
entirely sheathing. Spike erect, densely 7-15-flowered;
bracts imbricate for ± V2 their length, outer 7— 9(— 1 0)
mm long and up to two intemodes long, obtuse or trun-
cate, either green below or entirely brown and leathery,
conspicuously and closely veined, with narrow membra-
nous margins, inner bract V2 to 3A as long as outer, bifid,
± membranous with narrow brown zones along veins.
Flowers patent, pale to mid-blue, lower three tepals
with white median mark near base; perianth actinomor-
phic; tube slightly curved, 7-9 mm long, funnel-shaped,
exserted 2-5 mm beyond bracts; tepals oblanceolate,
subequal or inner slightly broader, spreading and slightly
cupped, ( 1 0 — ) 1 3 — 20 x 3-6 mm. Stamens ± declinate;
filaments 6-8 mm long, exserted ± 5-6 mm from tube;
anthers all facing upwards or median (lower) facing
downwards or outwards, 4 mm long, purple; pollen lilac.
Ovary obovoid, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style ± deflexed to lie
beneath stamens, dividing at middle of anthers, branches
3-5 mm long, divided to near base. Capsules ovoid, 6 x
3 mm long, slightly shorter to slightly longer than bract.
Seeds subglobose-angled, 1. 5-2.0 mm long, chalaza ±
excavated, yellowish brown, obscurely scalariform-rug-
ulose. Flowering time : Nov. (early Dec.). Figure 1 1.
Distribution and ecology n a local endemic between
Piketberg and Wellington, Thereianthus bulbiferus is
most common along the western foot of the Elandskloof
Mtns near Hermon, where it is known from several pop-
ulations on Elandsberg Nature Reserve (Figure 12). The
southernmost population near Agter Paarl, known only
from a single specimen collected over forty years ago. is
now likely extinct through agriculture. Plants at Elands-
berg Nature Reserve grow on seasonally moist or wet
alluvial flats, primarily in Swartland Alluvial Fynbos
(Mucina & Rutherford 2006) communities but extending
into adjacent Swartland Alluvial Renosterveld. Flower-
ing is most prolific after fire but occasional individuals
will flower in open or cleared spaces in the intervening
years. The species co-occurs throughout its range with
T. spicatus , which favours drier soils. At Elandsberg,
T. bulbiferus occurs as single-species communities on
the lower, moister flats but on the slopes, where it is
restricted to drainage lines, it interdigitates with T. spi-
catus growing on adjacent drier sites. The single collec-
tion from near Agter Paarl ( Thompson 622) is a mixed
gathering comprising a single stem of T. bulbiferus and
two stems of T. spicatus , suggesting that the two species
grew in close proximity there too, and both species have
also been collected on the Piketberg, although in differ-
ent localities.
Visits by monkey beetles (Coleoptera: Hopliini) have
been observed at Elandsberg Nature Reserve (unpub-
lished obs.) but the relatively short-tubed flowers pro-
duce nectar and are probably also visited by antho-
phorine bees.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus bulb-
iferus is diagnosed by its leathery leaves without raised
central and secondary veins when fresh, the lower leaf
mostly characteristically falcate or arcuate and often
sinuous-twisted, and by the moderately dense spikes of
blue flowers with relatively short, funnel-shaped peri-
anth tube, 7-9 mm long exserted up to 5 mm beyond the
bracts, actinomorphic perianth with white markings at
the base of all the tepals, and ± declinate stamens and
style. Flowers with declinate stamens are found else-
where in sect. Thereianthus only in T. bracteolatus , and
in both species the perianth tube is curved so that the
flowers face sideways rather than upwards. Both spe-
cies also have inconspicuously veined leaves. The seeds,
with an unusual chalazal depression or small excavation
rather than crest, are distinctive for T. bulbiferus.
Thereianthus bulbiferus is unique in the genus in pro-
ducing a cluster of cormels from the axil of the lower-
most leaf. These cormels, 3-4 mm diam., are present
at flowering time, and although they may be lost from
some pressed specimens, their presence can be read-
ily inferred by the split in the leaf sheath through which
they protruded. Florally, the species is distinguished
from T. bracteolatus by the light to mid-blue perianth
with white markings on all tepals, which are incon-
spicuously veined, the outer longitudinal veins ± evenly
branched along their entire length. The flowers of T.
bracteolatus , in contrast, are dark blue to purple without
evident white markings but with the longitudinal veins
splashed or spotted with purple. The outer longitudinal
veins in this species are typically only weakly branched
in the distal half so that the tepals appear to be parallel-
veined from the base.
All other members of sect. Thereianthus have
strongly and closely ribbed leaves, and mostly arcuate
stamens (except T. ixioides , which has symmetrical sta-
mens). Fresh leaves of the members of the T. spicatus
alliance have the veins separated from one another but
as the leaves dry and shrink, the veins become closely
appressed, leaving no gaps between them. The leaves of
T. bracteolatus and T. elandsmontanus, in contrast, are ±
256
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 1 1 . — Thereianlhus bulb-
iferus, Manning 3312. A,
whole plant; B, flower, front
view; C, half flower; D, outer
(left) and inner (right) bract;
E, details of stamens and
stigma; F, capsule; G, seeds.
Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm; D, E,
3 mm; F, 2 mm; G, 0.5 mm.
Artist: John Manning.
smooth and leathery when fresh and although the veins
become evident as the leaf dries, they remain separated
from one another by intervening blade tissue and by
lower order veins.
History, although collected on two separate occa-
sions several decades ago, Thereianthus bulbiferus was
confused with both T. bracteolatus and T. spicatus,
and it was only in 2010 when we were able to properly
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
257
16° 18" 20° 22° 24° 26° 28°
FIGURE 12. — Known distribution of Thereianthus bracteolatus, •; T.
bulbiferus, O.
examine living plants in the field at Elandsberg Nature
Reserve that it became clear that they represent a distinct
species.
Etymology, the specific epithet alludes to the charac-
teristic cormels on the lower part of the stem.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg, Sandleegte
[Buglerspost, at top of Versveld Pass], 2400' [730 m], (-DC), 3 Dec.
1973, Linder 130 (BOL). 3318 (Cape Town): Pause’s plot on Protea
F.U.C. road off Agter-Paarl road, (-CB), 2 Dec. 1968, Thompson 622A
(NBG). 3319 (Worcester): Bo-Hermon, Elandsberg Nature Reserve,
Vervlak, sandstone flats burned in Mar., (-AC), Nov. 1999, Manning
s.n. (NBG); 7 Nov. 1999, Parker 390 (NBG).
7. Thereianthus bracteolatus (Lam.) G.J. Lewis
in Journal of South African Botany 7: 42 (1941). Gladi-
olus bracteolatus Lam.: 725 (1788). Type: South Africa,
without precise locality, said to have been collected by
Sonnerat s.n. (P: Herb. Lamarck, holo. ! ).
Ixia punctata Andrews: t. 177 (1801). Watsonia punctata
(Andrews) Ker Gawl.: 229 (1804). Gladiolus punctatus (Andrews)
Roem. & Schult.: 425 (1817). Type: South Africa. 'Cape of Good
Hope’, said to have been collected and sent by G. Hibbert, illustration
in Andrews, The botanist's repository 3: t. 177 (1801).
Gladiolus subulatus Vahl: 97 (1805), nom. illegit. superfl. pro G.
bracteolatus Lam. (1788). Watsonia subulata Klatt, nom. nov. pro G.
subulatus Vahl, nom. illegit. et superfl. pro G. bractolatus Lam. Type:
South Africa, without precise locality or date, Bulow s.n. C1000844
(C, holo.!).
Gladiolus triticeus Thunb.: 194 (1807). Watsonia triticea (Thunb.)
Spreng.: 150 (1824). Beilia triticea (Thunb.) Eckl.: 43 (1827).
Micranthus triticeus (Thunb.) Heynh.: 405 (1847). Watsonia punc-
tata var. triticea (Thunb.) Baker: 177 (1892). Beilia spicata var. triti-
cea (Thunb.) Kuntze: 305 (1898). Type: South Africa, without precise
locality, Thunbergs.n. UPS-THUNB1084 (UPS-THUNB, holo.!).
Plants (80-)150-200(-300) mm high. Corm globose,
10-15 mm diam., developing several large cormels at
base; tunics of coarsely netted fibres, thickened and
forming woody claws below, accumulating with age and
forming collar up to 20 mm long around base of stem.
Stem erect, flexuous or flexed outward only above sheath
of second leaf, unbranched, ( 1 .5— )2.0— 2.5 mm diam.
below spike. Cataphylls dry and papery, reddish brown.
Leaves 4(5), lowermost inserted below ground, blade
reaching base of spike or not, ± dry at flowering, lin-
ear, elliptic or terete in section, 70-170 * 0.5—1 ,5(— 2.0)
mm, leathery, with 3 ± equally distinct veins or with
main vein slightly more distinct, not thickened or raised
when fresh but prominent when dry, upper 3(4) leaves
cauline with lower 2 inserted on lower 'A of stem and
sheathing for ± 'A length, sheaths usually shortly imbri-
cate, blades 50-70 mm long, uppermost leaf a little dis-
tant from lower leaves and well separated from spike,
entirely sheathing or with short blade 20-50 mm long.
Spike erect, densely 7-15(-30)-flowered; bracts imbri-
cate for ± 'A their length, 8—1 0( — 1 2) mm long and ±
two internodes long, outer entirely brown and leathery,
obtuse or truncate (rarely apiculate), conspicuously and
closely veined, with narrow membranous margins, inner
'A to ’A as long as outer, bifid, ± membranous with nar-
row brown zones along veins. Flowers ± patent, purple
to violet with dark blotches and streaks on longitudinal
veins and especially midline; perianth actinomorphic;
tube slightly curved, (7— )8— 1 0(— 1 5 ) mm long, funnel-
shaped. usually exserted 2 — 6( — 1 0) mm beyond bracts,
rarely just included; tepals oblanceolate, subequal or
inner slightly broader, spreading and slightly cupped.
( 10 — )1 1—17 x 3-6 mm. Stamens unilateral, ± declinate,
sometimes weakly so and then ± central; filaments 8-10
mm long, exserted ± 6-8 mm from tube, usually flexed
sharply upwards apically; anthers all facing upwards,
usually white (rarely purple), 4-6 mm long; pollen white
(rarely brown when anthers purple). Ovary’ obovoid,
2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style ± deflexed to lie beneath sta-
mens, dividing opposite middle of anthers, branches 3-5
mm long, divided to near base. Capsules ovoid, ± 6 mm
long. Seeds subglobose- or ellipsoid-angled, ± 2 mm
long, chalaza truncate, brown, testa colliculate. Flower-
ing time : late Nov. -early Jan. figure 13A-G.
Distribution and ecology >\ the only species of There-
ianthus on the Cape Peninsula, T. bracteolatus occurs
from the Peninsula and Stellenbosch along the coastal
ranges of the Hottentots Holland, Kogelberg and Klein
River/Babilonstoring Mtns to Bredasdorp in the east,
with isolated records from near Caledon (Drayton Sid-
ing) and the lower slopes of the Riviersonderend Mtns
above Greyton (figure 12). Somewhat surprisingly, the
species has not been recorded from the Caledon Swart-
berg. Although there is an early record, Zeyher 1608
(SAM), from the Twenty four Rivers Mtns near Porter-
ville. the species has never been re-collected here and as
this collection is a mixed one that includes a stem of T.
longicollis, which is known from this location, the asso-
ciation of T. bracteolatus with the locality is probably an
error.
The species is locally common after fire on sandy
flats and lower slopes below 1 000 m, although plants
will also flower in cleared places along roads in the
absence of fire. The distribution of Thereianthus bracte-
olatus largely overlaps with that of T. spicatus, with the
notable exception of the Cape Peninsula where only T.
bracteolatus is found, but T. spicatus favours more stony
sites and often heavier soils. We have encountered both
species growing adjacent to each other at Kogelberg,
with T. bracteolatus on damper soils and flowering in
December and T. spicatus immediately adjacent on
rocky slopes and flowering in January.
The purple or violet flowers with a relatively short
perianth tube are evidently adapted to pollination by var-
ious nectar-feeding bees.
258
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 13. — Thereianthus bracteolalus. A-E, Goldblatt 9032: A, whole plant; B, flower, side view; C, outer tepal; D, inner tepal; E, details of
stamens and stigma. F, G, Rodgers 2829: F, capsule; G, seeds. T. spicatus. H— J, Goldblatt 6837: H, whole plant; I, flower, front view; J,
flower, side view. K, L, Goldblatt & Manning 9567: K, capsules; L, seed. Scale bars: A, B, H-J, 10 mm; C, D, F, K, 2 mm; E, 3 mm; G, L,
0.5 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus bracteo-
latus is unmistakeable when seen alive, with very nar-
row leaves, 0.5—1 .5(— 2) mm diam., and terete or elliptic
in section, and dense spikes of sideways-facing, deep
purple or violet flowers with curved perianth tube (7— )8—
1 0(— 1 5 ) mm long, and relatively long, unilateral, dec-
imate stamens. The flowers, which lack nectar guides,
have darkly pigmented veins, giving them a character-
istic blotched-striate appearance. Although Lewis (1941)
noted that the branching pattern of the veins was dis-
tinctive for the species, this difference is not evident in
all plants. Like other species in the genus, each tepal
has three primary longitudinal veins but unlike other
species, the lateral veins are often only branched in
the basal half so that the tepals appear to be ± parallel-
veined for most of their length. In the other species the
veins are not darkly pigmented and thus not evident,
and the lateral longitudinal veins are ± evenly branched
throughout their length.
Perianth tube length is somewhat variable, usually
8-10 mm but 10-15 mm long in an isolated population
at Drayton Siding east of Caledon ( Goldblatt 394). The
anthers and pollen are usually white but plants from
Bothalia 4 1 .2 (2011)
259
the Silvermine area of the Cape Peninsula have purple
anthers with brown pollen. Another isolated popula-
tion, from the lower slopes of the Riviersonderend Mtns
above Greyton ( Esterhuysen 20763), has stamens that
are less obviously declinate than usual but matches the
species in vegetative and other floral characters, includ-
ing the distinctive tepal venation. This population may
repay further consideration.
The smooth leaves and especially the declinate sta-
mens (but not the characteristic tepal venation) are both
shared with Thereianthus bulbiferas from gravelly flats
between Malmesbury and Paarl. This species has pale
to mid-blue flowers with distinct white blotches at the
base of each tepal, and shorter filaments, 6-8 mm long.
Most characteristically, the plants develop a cluster of
cormels in the axil of the lower leaf, whereas cormels
in T. bracteolatus are developed at the base of the par-
ent corm. Although T. bracteolatus is sometimes con-
fused with T. spicatus, especially in the dried state when
details of the perianth coloration and stamen orientation
are obscured, the two are readily distinguished by the
difference in leaf texture: leathery and terete or elliptic
in section without raised veins in T. bracteolatus versus
plane and ribbed or corrugate with raised veins in T. spi-
catus. Living plants of T. spicatus are readily separated
by their blue (rarely white or pink) flowers with white
markings on the lower three tepals outlined with a pur-
ple chevron and lacking darker venation, the ± straight
or distally curved perianth tube, 12-25 mm long, and the
much shorter, arcuate filaments, 3^4 mm long.
History, the second species of Thereianthus to be
described after T. spicatus, T. bracteolatus was named in
the genus Gladiolus by French biologist J.P.B. Lamarck
(1788) from specimens said to have been collected by
naturalist and draughtsman Pierre Sonnerat, who could
only have collected this material in 1773, on the out-
going leg of his voyage to Isle de France (now Mauri-
tius). This name was overlooked by the English botani-
cal artist and engraver, Henry Andrews (1801), who
described Ixia punctata from plants cultivated in Lon-
don that had been sent to collector and botanical patron
G. Hibbert from the Cape of Good Hope. In continen-
tal Europe, the species was described under the name
Gladiolus triticeus for a third time a few years later by
Thunberg (1807), based on his own collections from
the Cape. At the time, Thunberg expressed doubt as to
whether his species was truly different from G. spica-
tus L. (i.e. T. spicatus) and must have appreciated the
similarity between these species, ultimately to be treated
in a separate genus. J.G. Baker (1892) subsequently
treated Thunberg’s name as a variety of Andrew’s spe-
cies, which had by now been transferred to Watsonia as
W. punctata (Andrews) Ker Gawl. The nomenclature
was clarified by Lewis (1941), who correctly identified
Lamarck’s name as the earliest for the species, and also
established the genus Thereianthus for plants until then
treated as subgen. Beilia of Watsonia.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Table Mountain, (-CD),
Jan. 1898, Thode 6017 (NBG), Dec. 1950, Pillars 10276 (MO);
Cape Peninsula, Camps Bay, (-CD), Dec. without year, Zeyher 5038
(SAM); 5 July 1943 [fr.]. Barker 2416 (NBG); above S end of Kirst-
enbosch, (-CD), 28 Nov. 1953, Esterhuysen 22404 (BOL); Kenil-
worth, (-CD), Dec. without year, Bolus 3305 (NBG); Kenilworth Race
Course, (-CD), 11 Dec. 1969, Esterhuysen 32359 (BOL, MO, NBG);
near Stellenbosch, (-DD), Dec. 1924, Rogers 28929 (BOL, NBG).
3319 (Worcester): Franschhoek Pass, east side, (-CC), 26 Nov. 1939,
Compton 8185 (NBG). 3418 (Simonstown): Vlaggenberg [Vlakken-
berg], (-AB), 1 Jan. 1896, Wolley Dod 345 (BOL); Bergvliet Farm. (—
AB), 16 Dec. 1976, Purcell 152 (SAM); Constantia Nek, (-AB), 24
Jan. 1929, Gillett 3365 (BOL, NBG); Steenberg Plateau, (-AB), Dec.
1944, Lewis 56067 (SAM); Silvermine Valley, (-AB), Dec. 1944,
Lewis 56066 (SAM); mntns above Muizenberg, (-AB), Jan. 1881,
Bolus 3305 (BOL, NBG); Red Hill, (-AB), 21 Dec. 1963, Taylor
5616 (NBG); Farm Buffelsfontein W of Redhill, (-AB), 17 Dec. 1984,
Snijman 833 (NBG); Patreis Vlei [Patrys Vlei], (-AD), 3 Jan. 1941,
Salter 8586 (BOL, NBG); Cape Point Reserve, sandy plain on Circu-
lar Drive, (-AD), 31 Dec. 1989, Goldblatt 9032 (MO); Cape Point, (-
AD), 1 Jan. 1968, Taylor 726 7 (NBG); Steenbras, (-BB), Dec. 1945,
Lewis 58735 (SAM); Palmiet River Valley, (-BD), Nov. 1944, Lewis
56408 (SAM); between Kogel Baai and Rooi Els, (-BD), Nov. 1945,
Lewis 58736 (SAM); Kogelberg State Forest, Palmiet River Valley, (—
BD), 29 Nov. 1991, Kruger 97 (NBG); Palmiet River Mouth, (-BD),
7 Dec. 1962, Grobler 71 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Aries Kraal, (-AA),
18 Nov. 1944, Leighton 808 (BOL); 18 Nov. 1944, Leighton 3361
(NBG); Lebanon Forest Reserve, (-AA), 14 Jan. 1971, Haynes 510
(NBG); Grabouw near Palmiet River, (-AA), Dec. 1899, Bolus 3305
(BOL); Bot River, (-AC), 9 Dec. 1951, Taylor 3810 (NBG); Honing-
klip. (-AC), without date, Taylor 5119 (NBG); Hermanus Mtn, (-AD),
26 Dec. 1943, Leighton 357 (BOL); Hermanus, Rotary Way, (-AC), 8
Jan. 1975, Walters 1452 ( NBG); Hermanus, Vogelgat Nature Reserve,
(-AD). 7 Jan. 1984, Burman 1273 (BOL); Femkloof Nature Reserve,
500 m, (-AD), 2 Jan. 1976, Orchard 359 (MO, NBG); top of Shaw’s
Pass, (-AD), Jan. 1957, Lewis 63514 (BOL); foothills of River Sonder
End [Riviersonderend] Mtns, (-BA), Apr.-May 1950 [fr.], Lewis 2280
(SAM); Zonder End [Riviersonderend], (-BA), without date, Barnard
448 (SAM); Riviersonderend Mtns near Greyton, (-BA), 30 Nov.
1952, Esterhuysen 20763 (BOL, MO, NBG); Caledon, Drayton Sid-
ing, (-BA), 16 Dec. 1968, Goldblatt (BOL); north end of Akkedisberg
Pass, fynbos slopes, burned last summer, (-BC), 19 Nov. 1979, Gold-
blatt 5186 (MO); Elandskloof, (-BD), 17 Dec. 1896, Schlechter 9765
(BOL, MO); between Gansbaai and Baardscheerdersbos, (-DA), 1 1
Nov. 1980, Snijman 380 (NBG); between Wolvengat and Elim, Farm
239, (-DA), 25 Nov. 2000, Mucina 251100/5 (NBG); Bredasdorp,
plateau on mountain top, (-DB), 19 Dec. 1930, Galpin 22442 (BOL).
Doubtful locality : 3319 (Worcester): Twenty Four Rivers, (-AA), with-
out date, Zeyher 1608 [excluding single specimen of T. longicollis as
indicated] (SAM).
Ser. Thereianthus
Leaves ribbed or corrugate, with thickened and raised
veins. Flowers suberect with ± straight tube; perianth
actinomorphic or more usually zygomorphic. Stamens
arcuate, rarely central.
8. Thereianthus spicatus (L.) G.J. Lewis in Jour-
nal of South African Botany 7: 39 (1941). Gladiolus
spicatus L.: 37 (1753). Ixia spicata (L.) Willd.: 200
(1797), horn, illegit. non Burm.f. (1768). Gladiolus
alopecuroides Pers.: 46 (1805), nom. illegit. pro Gladi-
olus spicatus L. et horn, illegit. non L. (1756). Micran-
thus spicatus (L.) Heynh.: 405 (1847). Paulomagnu-
sia spicata (L.) Kuntze: 702 (1891). Beilia spicata (L.)
ex Kuntze: 305 (1898) [Beilia spicata (L.) Eckl. nom.
inval.]. Type: from South Africa without any details ex
Herb, van Royen (?L, not found). Neotype, designated
here: South Africa, [Western Cape], Jonkershoek Val-
ley, contour path below Berg River Neck, 29 Dec. 1989,
Goldblatt & Manning 9028 (NBG. neo.; K, MO, PRE,
iso.).
Thereianthus spicatus var. linearifolius G.J. Lewis: 40 (1941).
Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], mountains near Franschhoek,
Salter 2973 (BOL, holo.!).
Gladiolus rubens Vahl: 98 (1805). Watsonia rubens (Vahl) Ker
Gawl.: sub t. 1072 (1807). Type: South Africa, not cited, probably at C.
260
Bothalia41,2 (2011)
Plants (150-)200-500(-600) mm high. Conn glo-
bose, 10-20 mm diam.; tunics of coarsely netted fibres,
thickened and claw-like at base, accumulating with age
and forming neck up to 20 mm long around base of
stem. Stem erect or flexed outward above sheath of sec-
ond leaf, unbranched or rarely with short branch from
axil of uppermost leaf, 1. 5-3.0 mm diam. below spike.
Cataphylls dry and papery, reddish brown. Leaves
4(5), lowermost inserted below ground, blade reach-
ing or exceeding spike (rarely shorter than spike), ±
dry at flowering, linear, ( 100-)200-250 x 1— 2(— 4) mm,
closely 3-5(-7)-ribbed, glabrous or minutely scabridu-
lous along ribs and margins, upper 3 leaves cauline,
second and third leaves usually ± imbricate and envel-
oping stem but uppermost leaf distant, blades succes-
sively shorter, uppermost leaf only rarely reaching base
of spike, entirely sheathing or with short blade 20-60
mm long. Spike erect, densely (3-)6-20(-30)-flowered;
bracts imbricate for V: to 2A length, (7— )8— 1 3 (— 15) mm
long and two or three internodes long, outer acute, either
green below or entirely brown and leathery, conspicu-
ously and closely veined, with narrow membranous mar-
gins, inner slightly shorter, bifid, ± membranous with
narrow brown zones along veins. Flowers suberect,
mostly pale to mid-blue, rarely white or pink, lower
three tepals each with white marking near base outlined
distally with purple chevron; perianth subactinomor-
phic or weakly zygomorphic; tube ± straight or slightly
curved outwards in distal 3 mm, ( 1 2—) 1 5— 1 8(— 25 ) mm
long, 1.0-1. 5 mm diam. at mouth, ± dilated gradually
and evenly from base to tip, exserted 6-15 mm beyond
bracts, 0.8-1. 8 x as long as tepals; tepals elliptical-
oblanceolate, inner three slightly smaller, spreading and
slightly cupped, 10-18 x 3-5 mm. Stamens arcuate; fila-
ments 3—4 mm long, exserted 2 mm from tube; anthers
4-5 mm long, purple; pollen purple. Ovary obovoid,
2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style arching above anthers, dividing
at ± middle of anthers, branches 4-5 mm long, divided
to near base. Capsules narrowly ovoid, 6-7 x 3 mm.
Seeds ellipsoid-angled, ± 2 mm long, black or brown,
testa striate-colliculate. Flowering time : (Nov.) Dec.-
Jan., rarely into early Feb. Figure 13H-L.
Ecology and distribution', the most common species
in the genus, Thereianthus spicatus is distributed along
the coastal mountains and foothills in the southwestern
part of Western Cape, from Piketberg and Porterville
southwards to the Palmiet River Mouth and onto the
lower slopes of the Riviersonderend Mtns but is absent
from the Cape Peninsula (Figure 14). The species is
mostly found on sandstone slopes but also grows on
shale bands and on granite, from near sea level to over
1 000 m. Flowering is strongly stimulated by fire but
plants will bloom in older, open veld and in fire-breaks.
Flower colour is somewhat variable in the species,
usually mid- to deep blue but sometimes white or pink.
Although the different forms are often mixed, there is an
altitudinal component to perianth colour in populations
in the Jonkershoek Valley, where the proportion of white
flowers increases with elevation. The relatively great
variation in perianth tube length suggests adaptation
to the local pollinator fauna. Mostly 15-20 mm long,
the perianth may be as long as 25 mm in plants from
Grootwinterhoek ( Helme 5141 ) and in Idas Valley, Stel-
lenbosch (Levyns 1458), and as short as 12 mm around
Somerset West ( Martley s.n. BOL22440, Schlechter
7245). Leaf width in the species is mostly 1-2 mm but
plants with broader leaves, 3—4 mm wide, are known
from Bainskloof, Stellenbosch, Kuils River and Somer-
set West. A collection of unusually delicate plants, with
small tepals 8 mm long (Esterhuvsen 22748) from Bai-
ley’s Peak matches the species in other respects, notably
the ribbed leaves, and perianth tube 1 5-20 mm long, and
we regard it as a local, montane form.
The moderately long-tubed flowers are evidently
adapted to pollination by correspondingly long-tongued
insects, and we have seen the species being visited by
the butterfly Cynthia cardui (Nymphalidae) at Jonker-
shoek. The perianth tube is narrowed towards the base,
and nectar wells up for some distance into the tube,
where it is accessible to long-tongued anthophorine bees
as well, which probably also play a role in pollination.
Diagnosis and relationships', the central species in
series Thereianthus, T. spicatus is distinguished from the
other members of the genus with strongly ribbed leaves
(71 elandsmontanus, T. ixioides and T. longicollis) by
flowers with a moderately long perianth tube, ( 1 2 — ) 1 5 —
1 8( — 25) mm long, usually curved outwards slightly near
the tip and dilating gradually and evenly from base to
apex. The tepals are relatively large, elliptical-oblanceo-
late, 10-18 x 3-5 mm, and the stamens are arcuate, with
filaments 3-4 mm long. Although usually glabrous, the
leaves in some plants are scabridulous along the ribs and
margins. This is especially evident in the collection from
Piketberg but occurs sporadically elsewhere as well.
Perianth length is more variable in this species than in
others, and longer-tubed forms are sometimes misidenti-
fied as Thereianthus longicollis — both species have been
collected in the mountains above Tulbagh Waterfall and
above Saron. We have seen both in the field and there is
no doubt that they are distinct. Longer-tubed plants of T.
spicatus, such as those from the Grootwinterhoek Mtns
above Porterville with tubes reaching to 25 mm long, are
distinguished from T. longicollis by their proportionally
larger tepals, always less than twice as long as the tube.
The critical differences separating T. spicatus from the
closely allied T. ixioides and also from T. bracteolatus
(ser. Bracteolatus), with which it has been confused in
the past, are discussed under those species.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
261
History, the earliest known species in the genus,
Thereianthus spicatus, was first named in the genus
Gladiolus (Royen 1740; Linnaeus 1753) but subse-
quently transferred to various other genera, including
Ixia L., Watsonia , Micranthus and the invalidly pub-
lished Beilia (Ecklon 1827). This reflects the uncertainty
about generic circumscriptions that prevailed for many
years. The original collector and date of collection are
unknown but the species was evidently cultivated in
the botanical gardens at Leiden. The Netherlands, in the
1740s. Forms with narrower leaves were distinguished
by Lewis (1941) as var. linearifolius but this distinction
has no taxonomic merit (Manning & Goldblatt 2004),
with individual collections showing a range of leaf
widths from 1-3 mm (e.g. Esterhuysen 13673).
Nomenclatural note : the species was based by Lin-
naeus (1753) on the polynomial Gladiolus foliis lineari-
bus, cattle simplicissimo, fioribus spicatus (Royen 1740)
but no specimen under this inscription could be located
at Leiden (G. Thijsse pers. comm. Nov. 2010) and must
be presumed lost — types of the other three Gladiolus
species listed by Royen (1740) are all at Leiden. Pos-
sibly, therefore, no authentic material was available to
Linnaeus. A specimen with the binomial G. spicatus
in the Linnean Herbarium (LINN 59.3) and inferred to
have come from Traugott Gerber (fl. 1739-1741) by
Jackson (1912). was regarded by Jarvis (2007) as origi-
nal material. Critically, however, this specimen does
not match the protologue, having just a single sheathing
leaf, and it cannot therefore be considered to be origi-
nal material. Although it was identified as the holotype
by Manning & Goldblatt (2004), their designation is
not nomenclaturally effective in lacking a definitive
phrase designating it as a lectotype (Jarvis 2007; Art.
9.21 : McNeill el al. 2006). Significantly, the specimen is
not in fact T. spicatus as currently understood, being a
species of Gladiolus, evidently G. communis. The cur-
rent taxonomic association of the name can be traced to
Thunberg (1807) (UPS-THUNB 1 072) but the basis for
this remains unknown. We designate a neotype here to
fix its application in this sense.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg, suurvlakte
[west of Avontuur near top of Versveld Pass], 780 m, (-DC), 23 Dec.
1973, Linder 187 (BOL). 3318 (Cape Town): Paarl Mtn, near top, (—
DB) , 2 Dec. 1929, Grant 5027 (BOL, MO); Penhill, Eersterivier, (—
DC) , 10 Dec. 1977, Raitt 288 (NBG); Kuils River, (-DC), Dec. 1931,
Basson s.n. BOL2430 (BOL); Joostenberg, (-DD), 14 Nov. 1965, Lewis
6222 (NBG); Jonkershoek, (-DD), 11 Dec. 1975, Kruger 119 (NBG);
Jonkershoek Valley, below Berg River Nek, (-DD), 29 Dec. 1989,
Goldblatt 9028 (MO. NBG); Jonkershoek, Swartboskloof, (-DD), 5
Dec. 1960, Van der Merwe 24-43 (NBG); 15 Jan. 1988, Forsyth 504
(NBG); Jonkershoek, Dwarsberg, (-DD), 9 Feb. 1959, Rycroft 2147
(NBG); Stellenboschberg above Coetzenberg, (-DD), Nov. 1992, De
Vos 2739 (NBG); Stellenbosch, Idas Valley, (-DD), 5 Dec. 1925, Lev-
yns 1458 (BOL). 3319 (Worcester): Groot Winterhoek, road to De
Tronk at Groot Kliphuis river crossing, (-AA), 10 Dec. 2007, Helme
5141 (NBG); Tulbagh, Waterv alberge, east of Suurvlak Falls, (-AC),
29 Dec. 2000, Hansford 21 (NBG); Elandsberg Nature Reserve,
Bosplaas trek. (-AC), 18 Nov. 1996, Parker 114 (NBG); Bains-
kloof Mtns, Bailey’s Peak, (-CA), 21 Feb. 1954, Esterhuysen 22748
(BOL); Bainskloof, (-CA), 1 Jan. 1941, Kies s.n. NBG62273 (NBG);
Limietberg, (-CA), 6 Jan. 1983, Goldblatt 6837 (MO, NBG); Wem-
mershoek Mtns, April Peak, (-CC), 15 Dec. 1940, Esterhuysen 4098
(BOL); Klein Drakenstein Mtns, upper Kasteelkloof, (-CC), 9 Jan.
1969, Kruger 879 (NBG); Du Toitskloof, (-CC). Jan. 1882, Tyson 905
(SAM); 1 Jan. 1950, Hall 285 (MO. NBG); Elandspad Catchment in
Agtertafelberg Kloof, (-CC), 28 Dec. 2000, Low 6769 (NBG); Zach-
ariaskloof Catchment, (-CC), 28 Dec. 1978, Kruger 1777 (NBG);
Franschhoek Pass, (-CC), Dec. 1929, Thode A2223 (NBG); 17 Jan.
1939, Gillett s.n. NBG62371 (BOL, NBG); 25 Jan. 1933, Pillans 7624
(BOL). 3418 (Simonstown): Somerset West, (-BA), Dec. 1930, Marl-
ley s.n. BOL22440 (BOL); Somerset West, Schaapenberg, (-BA), 14
Nov. 2006, Helme 4097 (NBG); Helderberg Nature Reserve, Porcu-
pine Buttress, (-BB), 3 Dec. 1993, Runnalls 639 (NBG); Sir Lowry’s
Pass, (-BB), 15 Jan. 1896, Schlechter 7245 (BOL); Dec. 1899, Bolus
4210 (BOL); 19 Dec. 1942, Compton 14222 (NBG); near foot of Sir
Lowry’s Pass, (-BB), 27 Jan. 1993, Goldblatt & Manning 9567 (MO,
NBG); Steenbrasdam, (-BB), 22 Dec. 1983, De Kock 73 (NBG); Steen-
bras Forest Reserve, (-BB), 24 Jan. 1951, Barker 7211 (BOL, NBG);
Elgin Forest Reserve, (-BB), Jan. 1951, Lewis 2906 (SAM); Kogel-
berg Forest Reserve, Blousteenberg, (-BD), 22 Dec. 1969. Boucher
972 (NBG); Betty's Bay, (-BD), 13 Dec. 1973, Vogts s.n. NBG173047
(NBG); Harold Porter Reserve, (-BD), 22 Nov. 1963, Topper s.n.
NBG70755 (NBG); Kogelberg, Oudebosch, (-BD), Dec. 1952, Stokoe
s.n. NBG173067 (NBG); slopes above Palmiet River Mouth, (-AC), 20
Dec. 1934, Salter 5180 (BOL); 26 Jan. 1947, Esterhuysen 136 73 (BOL,
NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Aries Kraal, (-AA), 30 Dec. 1944, Compton
16823 (NBG); sandy plateau above Viljoens pass, (-AA), 31 Jan. 1986,
Goldblatt 7627 (MO); Palmiet River Mtns, (-AC), Jan. 1947, Stokoe
s.n. (MO); Genadendal, (-BA), 28 Dec. 1894, Guthrie 3584 (NBG).
9. Thereianthus ixioides G.J. Lewis in Journal of
South African Botany 7: 41 (1941). Type; South Africa,
[Western Cape], Bain's Kloof [Bainskloof] at summit, 8
Dec. 1934. T.M. Salter 511 7 (BOL. holo.l).
Watsonia filifolia E.Mey. in Drege: 82 (1843), nom. nud. [South
Africa, Du Toitskloof, without date, Drege s.n. (MO)]. Watsonia punc-
tata var. filifolia E.Mey. ex Baker: 16: 159 (1877), nom. nud.
Plants 250-500 mm high. Conn globose, 12-20 mm
diam.; tunics of coarsely netted fibres, thickened and
claw-like at base, accumulating with age and forming
short neck around base of stem. Stem erect or flexed
outward above second sheath, unbranched, 1.0-1. 5 mm
diam. below spike. Cataphylls dry and papery, reddish
brown. Leaves 4(5), lowermost inserted below ground,
blade reaching or exceeding spike, green or dry at flow-
ering, linear, 200^100 x 1. 0-2.0 mm, closely 3-ribbed,
upper 3(4) leaves cauline, sheaths of all except upper-
most ± imbricate, blades successively shorter, up to 1 50
mm long, uppermost leaf entirely sheathing, distant from
next lower and separated from base of spike. Spike erect,
compact, densely 6-12-flowered; bracts imbricate for
V2 to 2L length, 8-13 mm long and two or three inter-
nodes long, outer acute or obtuse, either green below or
entirely brown and leathery, conspicuously and closely
veined, with narrow membranous margins, inner slightly
shorter, bifid. ± membranous with narrow brown zones
along veins. Flowers suberect, white to pale mauve
(rarely mid-blue), unmarked or lower three tepals
each with purple marking near base (rarely ± all tepals
marked); perianth actinomorphic; tube straight, 7 — 1 2( —
15) mm long, 0. 5-1.0 mm diam. at mouth, filiform and
tightly clasping style throughout, abruptly expanded in
distal 1 mm, exserted 1-9 mm beyond bracts, 0. 5-1.0 *
as long as tepals; tepals elliptical-oblanceolate, spread-
ing and slightly cupped or flat, 12-15 x 4-6 mm. Sta-
mens central, erect or diverging apically with anthers
spreading; filaments 3^4 mm long, swollen slightly at
base and occluding mouth of perianth tube; anthers 5-7
mm long, lilac or pale yellow; pollen cream-coloured.
Ovary obovoid. 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style central, divid-
ing between base and middle of anther, branches ± 3-4
mm long, divided to near base. Capsules ovoid. 7-1 0 x
3-5 mm. Seeds ellipsoid-angled, 2-3 mm long, yellow-
ish brown testa striate-colliculate. Flowering time : late
Nov.-Dee. or early Jan. Figure 15.
262
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
FIGURE 15. — Thereianthus ixioides. A-C, Manning 2198'. A, whole
plant; B, flower, front view; C, details of stamens and stigma. D,
E, Manning 3326: D, capsules; E, seeds. Scale bar: A, B, 1 0 mm;
C, 3 mm; D, 2 mm; E, 0.5 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Distribution and ecology. Thereianthus ixioides is a
narrow endemic of the mountains between Wellington
and Franschhoek, with most collections predictably from
the Bainskloof and Du Toitskloof Passes that traverse the
Limietberg and Klein Drakenstein Mtns respectively, and
from the Zachariaskloof catchment in the Wemmershoek
Mtns (Figure 16). Plants are locally common on cooler,
south-facing sandstone slopes at mid altitudes, mainly
around I 000 m, often in seasonally damp places, along
drainage lines or water courses. Flowering is stimulated by
fire but plants also bloom in open veld several years old.
FIGURE 16. — Known distribution of Thereianthus ixioides. •; T.
elandsmontanus , O.
The compact spikes of white to lilac (rarely blue),
actinomorphic flowers are probably adapted to a gen-
eralist pollination system and visited by a variety of
insects. The filiform perianth tube clasps the style tightly
for most of its length, with the mouth occluded by the
swollen bases of the filaments. Each flower produces
only trace amounts of nectar, which rises to the mouth of
the filiform perianth tube through capillary action, where
it can be accessed by insects with short mouthparts. The
flowers have a remarkable similarity in shape, colour
and markings to those of Ixia metelerkampiae, another
local endemic of the mountains near Wellington and vis-
its by the hopbine beetle (Scarabaeidae: Hopliini), Peri-
trichia sp., to both species were reported by Goldblatt et
al. (2000). Visits by hopbine beetles (Heterochelus sp.)
have also been observed at Franschhoek Pass (R. Saun-
ders, pers. comm. Jan. 2011), and pollination by these
beetles may be the primary strategy.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus ixioides
is recognized by its compact, subcapitate spike of actin-
omorphic, white or pale lilac (rarely mid-blue) flow-
ers with filiform, straight perianth tube 7 — 1 2( — 15 ) mm
long and up to 1 mm diam., tightly clasping the style for
most of its length and abruptly dilated only in the dis-
tal 1 mm, with the filaments thus completely exserted.
The stamens are symmetrically arranged, with ± hori-
zontally spreading anthers, and the filaments occlude the
mouth of the perianth tube. It has been confused with T.
spicatus but that species has a mostly longer, ± cylindri-
cal perianth tube ( 1 2-) 15-25 mm long that is evenly and
gradually dilated from the base and not tightly clasping
the style, and unilateral, arcuate stamens, with the base
of the filaments shortly included within the top of the
perianth tube and not occluding the mouth.
History. Thereianthus ixioides appears to have been
first collected in Du Toitskloof by botanical collector
Johann Franz Drege, who was active in the southwest-
ern Cape from 1826-1834. This material was distributed
under the name Watsonia filifolia E.Mey., and although
published by Meyer (Drege 1843), the name was not
accompanied by a description and is thus nomenclatu-
rally illegitimate. It was later treated as a variety of T.
spicatus by Baker (1877) under the name W. punctata
v ar. filifolia. Our association of the name W. filifolia with
T. ixioides is based on a duplicate of the Drege collec-
tion bearing this name in the herbarium of the Missouri
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
263
Botanical Garden (MO). The species was re-collected
from the same locality half a century later in 1882 by
the botanist William Tyson. His material, also identified
as Watsonia punctata (now T. bracteolcitus), raised no
interest. The next collection, that of Adele Grant made
in Bainskloof in 1926 was, however, recognized as rep-
resenting a new species of Watsonia (the genus to which
species of Thereianthus were then customarily referred),
an opinion that was confirmed when T.M. Salter, spe-
cialist on the genus Oxalis, also came across it in Bains-
kloof in December 1934. The species was subsequently
described by Lewis (1941) in her newly established
genus Thereianthus , based largely on Salter’s ample
material, and remained the most recent species to be rec-
ognized in the genus for more than half a century (Man-
ning & Goldblatt 2004).
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Bain’s Kloof [Bainskloof),
(-AC), 26 Nov. 1926, Grant 2644 (BOL, MO); Dec. 1957, Loubser
865 (NBG); Limietberg, north of Bain’s Kloof [Bainskloof], 3000'
[914 m], (-CA), 6 Jan. 1983, Goldblatt 6837 (MO, NBG); Bains-
kloof, just before summit. (-AC), 26 Nov. 1998, Manning 2198
(NBG); Baviaanskloof, above pools in middle of valley, (-CA), 15
Jan. 2011 [fruiting]. Manning 3326 (NBG); Klein Drakenstein. Haal-
hoek Spitzkop, (-CC), 2 Jan. 1947, Esterhuysen 13541 (BOL); Klein
Drakenstein Mtns, 1.5 km SE Hugenootskop. (-CC), 14 Jan. 2007,
Helme 4510 (NBG); Du Toitskloof, (-CC), Oct.-Jan. without year
[1826-1834], Dr'ege s.n. (MO); 1882 [without month], Tyson 904
(SAM); Dec. 1950, Lewis 2292 (SAM); 10 Dec. 1950, Barker 7166
(NBG); Dec. 1951, Stokoe s.n. SAM63513 (SAM); Wemmershoek
Valley, Dec. 1944, Lewis 849 (SAM); Wemmershoek. (-CC), 14 Dec.
1940, Esterhuysen 4039 (BOL); Haalsneeuwkop, 4000' [1 220 m], (—
CC), Dec. 1944, Stokoe s.n. SAM56189 (SAM); near Pofadder Pool
on Elandspad River, (-CC), 24 Nov. 1985, Fischer s.n. NBG133017
(NBG); Du Toitskloof Mtns, Elandspad catchment in Agtertafelberg
Kloof, 1 020 m, (-CC), 28 Dec. 2000, Low 6773 (NBG); Zachari-
ashoek, Kasteelkloof catchment, (-CC), 2100' [640 m], 14 Dec. 1972,
Smith 69 (NBG); 30 Dec. 1982, Viviers 1122 (NBG); Zachariashoek
catchment, (-CC), 18 Dec. 1969, Haynes 260 (NBG).
10. Thereianthus elandsmontanus Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning, sp. nov.
Plantae 140-240 mm altae, cormo globoso 10-15 mm
diam.. tunicis fibrosis crassis, caule erecto eramoso, cat-
aphyllis papyraceis rubro-brunneis, foliis 4, infimum sub
terra insertum laminis linearibus 3- vel 4-nervosis, spica
erecta dense 7- ad 15-flora, bracteis imbricatis 8— 1 0(—
13) mm longis, bractea externa infra viridi vel omnino
brunnea coriacea, interna pauciter breviore, floribus
cremeis ad pallide cameis tepalis inferioribus in medio
marroninis striatis, perianthio leviter zygomorpho, tubo
(17-) 20-23 mm longo cylindrico, tepalis lineari-oblan-
ceolatis patentibus pauciter cupulatis 12-15 x 2-3 mm,
staminibus unilateralibus arcuatis, filamentis 4-5 mm
longis ex tubo 2-3 mm exsertis, antheris 4 mm longis
atropurpureis, styli ramis fere ad basem furcatis ± 3 mm
longis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester); Bo-Her-
mon, Elandsberg Nature Reserve, Slangkop. low sand-
stone ridge, two years after fire, (-AC), 7 Nov. 2010,
J.C. Manning 3313 (NBG, holo.; MO, iso.).
Plants 140-240 mm high. Corm globose, 10-15 mm
diam.; tunics of coarse, matted fibres, accumulating with
age and forming short neck around base of stem. Stem
erect, unbranched, ± 1.5 mm diam. below spike. Cata-
phylls dry and papery, reddish brown. Leaves 4, lower-
most inserted below ground, blade exceeding spike, ±
dry at flowering, linear, 200-250 * 2-3 mm, closely 3-
or 4-ribbed, upper 3 leaves cauline, sheaths ± imbricate
and enveloping entire stem, blades successively shorter,
up to 100 mm long, uppermost leaf sheath ± reaching to
base of spike, with short blade 20-30 mm long. Spike
erect, densely 7-15-flowered; bracts imbricate for Ji to
2h length, 8—1 0(— 1 3) mm long and two or three inter-
nodes long, outer acute, either green below or entirely
brown and leathery, conspicuously and closely veined,
with narrow membranous margins, inner bract slightly
shorter, bifid, ± membranous with narrow brown zones
along veins. Flowers suberect, cream-coloured to pale
flesh-pink, flushed purple on tube, lower three tepals
with median linear maroon streak extending halfway
along blade; perianth weakly zygomorphic; tube slightly
curved outwards in distal 3 mm, ( 1 7— )20— 23 mm long,
± 1.5 mm diam. at mouth, ± cylindrical but widening
slightly distally, exserted 13-15 mm beyond bracts;
tepals linear-oblanceolate, inner three slightly smaller,
spreading and slightly cupped, 12-15 x 1. 5-3.0 mm.
Stamens arcuate; filaments 4-5 mm long, exserted 2-3
mm from tube; anthers 4 mm long, blackish purple; pol-
len purple. Ovary obovoid, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style arch-
ing above anthers, dividing between base and middle of
anthers, branches, ± 3 mm long, divided to near base.
Capsules narrowly ovoid, 5-7 x 3 mm. Seeds ellipsoid-
angled, ± 2 mm long, yellowish brown, testa striate-col-
liculate. Flowering time'. Nov. Figure 17.
Distribution and ecology’'. Thereianthus elands-
montanus is known from a single small population on
Slangkop, a low sandstone ridge on Elandsberg Nature
Reserve near the foot of the Elandskloof Mtns near
Hermon (Figure 16). Just a couple of dozen individuals
were found. Although only discovered two years after a
fire had cleared the site, it is clear that the species also
flowered in the first year after the bum since one of the
individuals had the remains of a previous flowering stem
still associated with the corm.
The moderately long-tubed, cream-coloured to flesh-
pink flowers with conspicuous narrow, maroon markings
on the lower three tepals bear a striking resemblance to
those of several co-occurring species of Iridaceae, nota-
bly Lapeirousia anceps (L.f.) Ker Gawl. and Tritonia
undulata (Burm.f.) Baker, that are adapted to pollination
by long-proboscid tabanid flies in the genus Philoliche,
and it is likely that Thereianthus elandsmontanus is also
a member of this pollination guild.
Diagnosis and relationships'. Thereianthus elands-
montanus is distinguished from the other ribbed-leaved
species in the genus (ser. Thereianthus ), by its cream-
coloured to pale flesh-pink flowers with moderately
long tube, 17-23 mm long and 1 .5-1.8 * as long as the
narrow, ± linear tepals which are 1. 5-3.0 mm wide, the
lower three each with a conspicuous maroon median
streak extending over the lower half. Unfortunately
the flowers do not retain their colour in the herbarium,
drying bluish lilac. T. elandsmontanus is most likely to
be confused with T. spicatus, which has a tube of simi-
lar length and which also occurs at Elandsberg Nature
Reserve but this species has blue (rarely white or pink
flowers) with broader, lanceolate tepals, 3-5 mm wide,
the lower three marked with a white flash at the base
264
FIGURE 17. — Thereianthus elandsmontanus, Manning 3313. A, whole
plant; B, flower, front view; C, flower, side view; D, capsules;
E, seed. Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm; D, 2 mm; E, 0.5 mm. Artist:
John Manning.
bordered distally by a small blue chevron, and slightly
shorter filaments, 3^4 mm long vs 4-5 mm long.
Although these differences may seem minor, we are
familiar with both species on the reserve and are con-
vinced that they are distinct. Another related species,
T. longicollis from the nearby Saronsberg and Eland-
skloof Mtns, has a much longer tube, 25-40 mm long
and 2. 0-2. 5 x longer than the tepals, the lower three of
which are marked with a dark, transverse chevron. The
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
leaves in T. elandsmontanus are often slightly broader
than in T. longicollis, 2-3 mm vs 1-2 mm, with 3 or 4
vs consistently 3 raised veins. We considered the pos-
sibility that the Elandsberg plants might be an isolated,
short-tubed form of this species, possibly recognizable
at subspecific rank but the consistent morphological and
ecological differences between them suggest that rec-
ognition at species level is more appropriate. Typical T.
longicollis is a montane species and the clear separation
in tube length between it and T. elandsmontanus argues
for complete genetic isolation between them.
History: the most recently discovered species in the
genus, Thereianthus elandsmontanus was collected for
the first time in November 2010 on a low sandstone
ridge on Elandsberg Nature Reserve. This ridge has been
explored botanically since 1996 by the owners of the
property. Dale and Elizabeth Parker, but the species was
only noticed when it flowered in response to a controlled
bum of the ridge in early 2008.
Etymology: the name derives from the Elands-
berg Nature Reserve, where the species appears to be
endemic.
11. Thereianthus longicollis (Schltr.) G.J. Lewis
in Journal of South African Botany 7: 39 (1941). Watso-
nia longicollis Schltr.: 106 (1900). Type: South Africa,
[Western Cape], Tulbagh Waterfall, in saxosis, ± 1200'
[365 m], 10 Nov. 1896, R. Schlechter 9055 (B, holo.;
BOL!, GRA1, MO!, PRE! (4 sheets), iso.).
Watsonia punctata var. longicollis Baker: 177 (1892). Type: South
Africa, [Western Cape], Worcester [District], Zeyher s.n. K400455 (K,
holo.!).
Plants 150-350 mm high. Conn globose, 10-15 mm
diam.; tunics of coarsely netted fibres, thickened and
claw-like at base, accumulating with age and forming
short neck around base of stem. Stem erect, unbranched,
± 1.5 mm diam. below spike. Cataphylls dry and papery,
reddish brown. Leaves 4, lowermost inserted below
ground, blade reaching or exceeding spike, ± dry at
flowering, linear, 200-250 x 1-2 mm, closely 3-ribbed,
upper 3 leaves cauline, sheaths ± imbricate and envel-
oping entire stem or slightly distant, blades succes-
sively shorter, up to 150 mm long, uppermost leaf
sheath reaching to base of spike or separated from it,
with short blade 20-60 mm long. Spike erect, densely
7- 1 5(-20)-flowered; bracts imbricate for 'A to 2A length,
8— 1 2(— 1 7 ) mm long and two or three internodes long,
outer acute, either green below or entirely brown and
leathery, conspicuously and closely veined, with nar-
row membranous margins, inner slightly shorter, bifid,
± membranous with narrow brown zones along veins.
Flowers suberect, white or pale pink to purple-pink with
purple tube, lower three tepals each with purple chev-
ron or diamond-shaped markings near base; perianth
weakly zygomorphic; tube slightly curved outwards in
distal 3 mm, 25-40 mm long, ± 2 mm diam. at mouth,
± cylindrical but dilated slightly distally, exserted 20-30
mm beyond bracts, 2. 0-2. 5 x longer than tepals; tepals
oblong-oblanceolate, inner three slightly smaller, spread-
ing and slightly cupped, 12-17 x 2. 5-5. 5 mm. Stamens
arcuate; filaments 6 mm long, exserted 3 mm from tube;
anthers 4-6 mm long, purple; pollen purple. Ovaty
obovoid, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long; style arching above anthers.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
265
FIGURE 18. — Thereianthus longicollis, Manning 3325. A, whole plant;
B, flower, front view; C, flower, side view; D, dehisced capsules;
E, seed. Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm; D, 2 mm; E, 0.5 mm. Artist:
John Manning.
slopes of the Elandskloof Mtns. Plants grow in sandy
gravel or loamy ground on rocky sandstone slopes, and
flower regularly in open proteoid or restioid fynbos.
The very long-tubed, pink or purple-pink flowers with
purple markings on the lower three tepals have the stereo-
typical adaptations for pollination by long-proboscid flies.
At or near the type locality above Tulbagh Waterfall we
observed pollination visits by the tabanid fly, Philoliche
rostrata, the proboscis of which measured ± 40 mm, a
close match to the tube length in Thereianthus longicollis.
At this site other representatives of this pollination guild
included T. minutus, Geissorhiza confusa (Iridaceae) and a
long-tubed and large-flowered race of Lobelia coronopifo-
lia (Lobeliaceae) with a pink corolla.
Diagnosis and relationships ; Thereianthus longicol-
lis is separated from all other species in the genus by
its unusually long perianth tube, 25^-0 mm long and
2.0-2. 5 times longer than the tepals. The species could
only be confused with longer-tubed forms of T. spica-
tus , which have also been recorded from the mountains
above Porterville and which we have seen ourselves
above Tulbagh Waterfall but the perianth tube in T. spi-
catus is shorter, mostly less than 20 mm long (rarely
up to 25 mm) and always less than twice as long as the
tepals. and also narrower, at most 1.5 mm diam. at the
mouth. A second species in ser. Thereianthus with long-
tubed flowers, T. elandsmontanus from the foothills of
the Elandskloof Mtns, has a consistently shorter perianth
tube, 17-23 mm long, narrower tepals 2-3 mm wide,
with the lower half largely covered by linear purple
markings, and often broader leaves with 3 or 4 ribs (see
that species for further discussion).
History : Thereianthus longicollis was first encoun-
tered by botanical collectors Christian Frederick Ecklon
and Carl Ludwig Zeyher, who were active in the Cape
Colony through the middle of the nineteenth century
(Glen & Germishuizen 2010). Their material from Tul-
bagh Waterfall was distributed under the name Watso-
nia (Beilici) triticea (now T. bracteolatus) and the taxon
was first formally recognized as a long-tubed variant of
T. bracteolatus under the name Watsonia punctata var.
longicollis by Baker (1892, 1896). Although no material
was initially listed under this variety. Baker (1896) later
cited Zeyher s.n. under this name, thereby typifying it
unambiguously against a specimen bearing that inscrip-
dividing at ± middle of anthers, branches ± 4-5 mm
long, divided to near base. Capsules narrowly ovoid,
6-7 x 2. 5-3.0 mm. Seeds ellipsoid-angled. ± 2.5 mm
long, yellowish brown, testa striate-colliculate. Flower-
ing time ; mostly mid-Nov.-late Dec. Figure 18.
Distribution and ecology. Thereianthus longicollis is
a narrow endemic of the mountains between Porterville
and Wolseley (Figure 19), thus including the southern
end of the Grootwinterhoek Mtns, Saronsberg and the
Elandskloof Mtns. The species has been collected sev-
eral times at the type locality near the Tulbagh Waterfall
but is otherwise known from just a few records to the
north above Saron and Porterville, and most recently
from Elandsberg Nature Reserve on the lower western
16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° 28°
FIGURE 19. — Known distribution of Thereianthus longicollis, •.
266
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
tion at the Kew Herbarium, which had been acquired
on 1 April 1865 from H.G. Reichenbach. The species
was subsequently re-collected at Tulbagh Waterfall on
10 November 1896 by botanist Rudolph Schlechter,
who realized that Baker was incorrect in associating the
plants with T. bracteolatus and described it as a distinct
species under the name W. longicollis, citing only his
collection. Although the labels on his specimens indicate
that Schlechter had initially intended to recombine Bak-
er's variety at specific rank, the name as later published
is presented as a new species and we treat it as such.
Additional specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Twenty Four Rivers, (—
AA), without date, Zeyher 1608 [only one of' the specimens as indi-
cated on sheet] (SAM); De Hoek Estate, near Saron, (-AA), Nov.
1941, Stokoe s.n. SAM55617 (SAM); slopes of Great Winterhoek Mtns
near Saron, (-AA), Nov. 1941, Stokoe s.n. (BOL); Porterville, plateau
above [Farm] Gelukwaards, (-AA), Dec. 1910, Edwards 80 (BOL);
Bo-Hermon, Elandsberg Nature Reserve, lower slopes of Elandskloof
Mtns at southern boundary of farm at end of fence-road, (-AC), 5 Dec.
2010, Manning 3325 (NBG); Tulbagh Waterfall, (-AC), Nov. without
year, Ecklon cfi Zeyher s.n. SAM70719 (SAM); 16 Nov. 1941, Comp-
ton 12413 (NBG); [Elandskloof Mtns], Ontongsberg [Ontongskop],
lower slopes, (-AC), 16 Nov. 1941, Isaac s.n. (BOL); Voelvleiberge
[Elandskloofberge], ascent to Protea plain, (-AC), 29 Dec. 2000,
Hansford 20 (NBG).
EXCLUDED SPECIES
Beilia spicata var. brevifolia Kuntze: 305 (1898).
Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], Mowbray bei Caps-
tadt, collector and date unknown (specimen not located).
The brief description of this taxon \ folds brevibus 1-2
cm lads acuminads ’ and its collection at Mowbray,
a suburb of Cape Town, make it certain that it is not
Thereianthus spicatus , which has much narrower leaves
and is absent from the Cape Peninsula. The only pos-
sibility in Thereianthus is thus T. bracteolatus but the
broad leaves are inconsistent with this species as well
and suggest that it might be a species of Watsonia but its
identity remains unclear.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Elizabeth Parker for her assistance and com-
panionship in the field; Roy Gereau for advice on nomen-
clatural questions and for revising our Latin descriptions;
Otto Leistner for his assistance with our Latin; Mary
Stififler, Research Librarian, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, for providing copies of needed literature; Stephen
Boatwright for very kindly preparing the micrographic
plates; Michelle Smith for the electronic maps; Jonathan
Colville for beetle identifications; Amida Johns for assist-
ing us in the field; and the curator of the Bolus Herbar-
ium (BOL) for the loan of specimens. Collecting permits
were provided by CapeNature, South Africa.
REFERENCES
ANDREWS, H. 1801 . Ixia punctata. The botanist’s repository 3 : 1. 177.
BAKER, J.G. I 876a. New species of Ixieae. Journal of Botany, London
14: 236-239.
BAKER, J.G. 1876b. New Gladioleae. Journal of Botany, London 14:
333-339.
BAKER, J.G. 1877 [as 1878]. Systema iridearum. Journal of the Lin-
nean Society, Botany 16: 61-180.
BAKER, J.G. 1892. Handbook of the Irideae. George Bell, London.
BAKER, J.G. 1896. Iridaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 7-71. Reeve, Ashford.
BROWN, N.E. 1931. XXIX. Notes upon South African plants. Bulle-
tin of Miscellaneous Information, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
1931: 191-197.
BURMAN, N.L. 1768. Prodromus florae capensis. Cornelius Haak,
Leiden.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Dokumente. Flora
1843. Leipzig.
ECKLON, C.F. 1827. Topographisches Verzeichniss der Pflanzen-
sammlung von C.F. Ecklon. Reiseverein, Esslingen.
GLEN, H.F. & GERMISHUIZEN, G. 2010. Botanical exploration of
southern Africa, edn 2. Strelitzia 26. South African National Bio-
diversity Institute, Pretoria.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1971. Cytological and morphological studies in the
southern African Iridaceae. Journal of South African Botany 37:
317-460.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1989. The genus Watsonia. Annals of Kirstenbosch
Botanic Garden 19: 1-148.
GOLDBLATT, P„ BERNHARDT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1998. Pol-
lination of petaloid geophytes by monkey beetles (Scarabaeidae:
Ruteliinae: Hopliini) in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 85: 215-230.
GOLDBLATT, P„ BERNHARDT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000. Adap-
tive radiation of pollination mechanisms in Ixia (Iridaceae: Cro-
coideae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 564-577.
GOLDBLATT, P„ DAVIES, T.J., MANNING, J.C., VAN DER BANK,
M. & SAVOLAINEN, V. 2006. Phylogeny of Iridaceae subfami-
ly Crocoideae based on a combined multigene plastid analysis.
Aliso 22: 399—411.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2006. Radiation of pollination
systems in the Iridaceae of sub-Saharan Africa. Annals of Botany
(London) 97: 317-344.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2008. The Iris family: natural
history and classification. Timber Press, Oregon.
GOLDBLATT, P„ MANNING, J.C. & BARI, A. 1 99 1 . Sulcus and oper-
culum structure in the pollen grains of Iridaceae subfamily Ixioi-
deae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 950-961 .
GOLDBLATT, P„ RODRIGUEZ, A., POWELL, M.P., DAVIES, T.J.,
MANNING, J.C., VAN DER BANK, M. & SAVOLAINEN, V.
2008. Iridaceae ‘Out of Australasia’? Phylogeny, biogeography,
and divergence time based on plastid DNA sequences. System-
atic Botany 33: 495-508.
GOLDBLATT, P. & TAKEI, M. 1997. Chromosome cytology of Iridace-
ae, base numbers, patterns of variation and modes of karyotype
change. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 285-304.
HEYNHOLD, G. 1847 [as 1846]. Alphabetische und synonvmische
Aufzahlung der Gewachse. Dresden & Leipzig.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part I: the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
JACKSON, B.D. 1912. Index to the Linnean Herbarium with indication
of the types of species marked by Carl von Linne. Proceedings of
the Linnean Society (London), session 124, Suppl.: 1-152.
JARVIS, C. 2007. Order out of chaos. The Linnean Society of London
and Natural History Museum, London.
KER GAWLER, J. 1804. Ensatorum ordo. Annals of Botany (Konig &
Sims) 1: 219-247.
KER GAWLER, J. 1807. Watsonia rosea. Pyramidal watsonia. Curtis's
Botanical Magazine 27: sub t. 1072.
KLATT, F.W. 1882. Erganzungen und Berichtigungen zu Baker’s Sys-
tema Iridacearum. Abhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesells-
chaft zu Halle 15: 44-404.
KLATT, F.W. 1894. Iridaceae. In T.H. Durand & H. Schinz, Conspectus
florae Africae 5: 187-192.
KUNTZE, O. 1891 . Revisio generum plantarum , vol. 2. Felix, Leipzig.
KUNTZE, O. 1898. Revisio generum plantarum , vol. 3, part 3. Felix,
Leipzig.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P.M. DE. 1788. Encyclopedie methodique bota-
nique 2. Paris.
LEWIS, G.J. 1941. Iridaceae. New genera and species and miscellane-
ous notes. Journal of South African Botany 1: 19-59.
LEWIS. J.G. 1954. Some aspects of the morphology, phylogeny and
taxonomy of the South African Iridaceae. Annals of the South
African Museum 40: 15-113.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Laurentius Salvius, Stock-
holm.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
267
LINNAEUS, C. 1756. Centwia plantamm II. Hojer, Uppsala.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2004. A new species of Thereian-
thus (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) from Western Cape, South Africa,
nomenclatural notes and a key to the genus. Bothalia 34: 1 03—
106.
MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P. & SNIJMAN, D. 2002. The color
encyclopedia of Cape bulbs. Timber Press, Oregon.
McNEILL, J., BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J., SILVA, PC., SKOG, J.E., WIERSMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. (eds). 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the seventeenth Inter-
national Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Gant-
ner, Liechtenstein. Regnum Vegetabile 146.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
PERSOON, C.H. 1805. Synopsis plantamm, vol. 1 . Cramer, Paris.
REEVES, G., CHASE, M.W., GOLDBLATT, P. RUDALL, P„ FAY,
M.F., COX, A.V., LEJEUNE, B. & SOUZA-CHIES, T. 2002.
Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid
DNA regions. American Journal of Botany 88: 2074—2087.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1817. Systema vegetabilium secun-
dum, vol. 1 . Stuttgart.
ROYEN, R. VAN. 1740. Florae leydensis prodromus. Luchtmans, Lei-
den.
RUDALL, P. 1995. VIII. Iridaceae. In D.F. Cutler & M. Gregory, Anat-
omy of the monocotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1900. Plantae schlechterianae novae vel minus cog-
nitae describuntur II. Botanische Jahrbiicher 27: 86—220.
SCOTT ELLIOT, G. 1891. Notes on the fertilisation of South African
and Madagascan flowering plants. Annals of Botany 5: 333-405.
SPRENGEL, K. 1824. Systema vegetabilium, vol. 1. Dietrich, Gottin-
gen.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1784. Dissertatio de Gladiolus. Edman, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1807. Flora capensis. Edman, Uppsala.
VAHL, M. 1805. Enumeratio plantarum, vol. 2. Copenhagen.
VOGEL, S. 1954. Bliitenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippeng-
liederung. Botanische Studien 1 : 1-338.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1797. Species plantamm, edn. 4. Berlin.
Bothalia 41,2: 269-276 (2011)
Romulea pilosa and R. quartzicola (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), two new
species from the southern African winter rainfall region, with nomen-
clatural corrections including new names for R. amoena , R. neglecta
and R. rosea var. reflexa
J.C. MANNING*. P. GOLDBLATT** and A.D. HARROWER***
Keywords: Iridaceae, new species, nomenclature, Romulea Maratti, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Romulea pilosa J.C. Manning & Goldblatt and R. quartzicola J.C. Manning & Goldblatt are two narrow endemics from
the southern African winter rainfall region. An early, fragmentary collection of R. pilosa from Riviersonderend lacked the
diagnostic corm and was thus mistakenly associated with R. tetragona (sect. Ciliatae) as \sx.flavandra MP.de Vos because of
the highly distinctive pilose, H-shaped leaf. The rediscovery of the taxon in the wild shows it to be a previously unrecognized
member of sect. Aggregatae, distinguished by its unusual foliage and bright orange flowers. R. quartzicola was grown to
flowering from seeds collected from quartz patches in southern Namaqualand and proved to be a new species of sect. Ciliatae,
distinguished by its early flowering, short, subclavate leaves with reduced sclerenchyma strands, and bright yellow flowers
with short bracts. R. neglecta M.P.de Vos, a rare endemic from the Kamiesberg in Northern Cape, is a later homonym for the
Mediterranean R. neglecta Jord. & Fount, and the earliest name for this plant is shown to be R. speciosa (Ker Gawl.) Baker,
typified by an illustration in Andrews’ The botanist's repository. An epitype is designated to fix the application of the name.
We have also examined the type illustration of R. pudica (Sol. ex Ker Gawl.) Baker, hitherto treated as an uncertain species,
and are confident that it represents the species currently known as R. amoena Schltr. ex Beg., and takes priority over it as
being the earlier name. The type of R. reflexa Eckl., a new name for the later homonym I. reflexa Thunb. and the basionym
of R. rosea var. reflexa (Eckl.) Beg., has been mistakenly identified as an Ecklon collection but is in fact the collection that
formed the basis of Thunberg’s I. reflexa. This collection is actually a form of R.flava Lam., and the name R. rosea var. re-
flexa is thus moved to the synonomy of that species. The variety currently known under this name should now be known as R
rosea var. muirii (N.E.Br. ) Goldblatt & J.C. Manning. Finally, the protologue of R. parviflora Eckl., until now treated under
the synonomy of R. obscura Klatt var. obscura, is in fact consistent with R. rosea var. australis (Ewart) M.P.de Vos, and we
therefore include the name in the synonomy of the latter.
INTRODUCTION
Romulea Maratti, one of the larger genera of Iri-
daceae (Goldblatt & Manning 2008), is widely distrib-
uted through eastern sub-Saharan Africa, the Medi-
terranean and the Near East. It is centred in the winter
rainfall region of southern Africa, where 80 % of the
species occur ( De Vos 1 972, 1 983; Manning & Goldblatt
2001,2004,2006).
Flower structure in the genus is conservative (Gold-
blatt et al. 2002), with a few notable exceptions, and
characters of the corm are essential in the primary subdi-
vision of the genus into subgenera and sections (Manning
& Goldblatt 2001, 2004). Flower colour and markings, as
well as the texture and details of the membranous mar-
gins of the bracts provide the primary specific characters.
Additional valuable anatomical characters include the
distribution of vascular bundles in the leaf and the devel-
opment of sclerenchyma caps and strands.
Five new species have been described since the
last review of the genus (Manning & Goldblatt 2001,
* Compton Fterbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town / Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
*** Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 2011-04-14.
2004, 2006), and a further two highly local endemics
are described here, bringing to 83 the number of spe-
cies recorded from southern Africa and raising the total
number in the genus to ± 97 spp.
Romulea pilosa , a spring-flowering species endemic
to stony renosterveld in the Overberg south of Rivier-
sonderend, was collected at least as long ago as the
early 1930s but the fragmentary material was misidenti-
fied until recently. It is named for the distinctive, pilose
leaves. R. quartzicola , a recently discovered, winter-
flowering species from quartz patches in the southwest-
ern comer of the Knersvlakte, is named for its unusual
habitat. We also deal with the nomenclature of Romulea
neglecta M.P.de Vos ( 1983), a later homonym. The earli-
est legitimate name for the species is R. speciosa (Ker
Gawl.) Baker (1877), which coincidentally has the same
type as R. neglecta.
Collections at BOF, NBG, PRE and SAM, the main
herbaria with good representation of Cape species, were
consulted (herbarium acronyms after Holmgren et al.
1990).
TAXONOMY
1. Romulea pilosa J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp.
nov.
Ad sectionem Aggregatae M.P.de Vos pertinens et
recognita caule subterraneo vel breviter aerio, foliis rela-
tive brevibus falcatis H-formibus 4-6 mm latis, margin-
270
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
bus late alatis ciliatisque, floribus salmoneis vel auran-
tiacis cupulo flavo, tubo perianthii infundibuliformi ± 5
mm longo parte inferiori ± 1 mm longo, tepalis oblan-
ceolatis 20-30 x 7-10 mm, filamentis 5-6 mm longis
minute pilosis in dimidio inferiori, antheris ± 4 mm
longis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3420 (Bredasdorp): Farm
Fonteinkloof, between Riviersonderend and Protein, hill
W of homestead, (-AA), 15 Aug. 2009, Manning 3220
(NBG, holo.; MO, iso.).
Plants ± 60 mm high; stem subterranean or shortly
aerial, simple or with up to 2 branches. Conn subglo-
bose, asymmetric, obliquely flattened towards base
with crescent-shaped basal ridge; tunics hard, smooth,
dark brown, split into clusters of convergent fibrils
on basal ridge and splitting along clusters into nar-
row vertical strips, drawn into short fibrils up to 2 mm
long above. Cataphylls 3, membranous, flushed green-
ish above ground. Foliage leaves 2, lowermost 1 basal,
blades falcate, H-shaped in section, lowermost 50-70
x 4-6 mm, upper shorter, lateral ribs reduced, median
(apparently marginal) ribs extended laterally to form
flange-like wings 1-2 mm wide along each side of
blade, densely villous along margins of wings with hairs
1-2 mm long in two diverging rows. Inflorescence of
solitary flowers; peduncles angled in section and vil-
lous along angles in distal part; outer bracts subobtuse,
13-15 mm long, green with narrow, translucent mem-
branous margins, strongly keeled along median and
submarginal veins, longitudinally indexed along sub-
marginal veins, median keel sometimes double, keel
and submarginal veins densely pubescent, inner bracts
green with broad translucent white margins, ± as long
as outer, bicarinate with keels densely pubescent. Flow-
ers deeply cup-shaped, cup ± 10 mm deep, salmon-pink
to dull orange but golden yellow in lower half to two
thirds, yellow extending beyond cup margin onto lower
third of limb, outer tepals flushed coppery on reverse,
unscented, 30-40 mm diam.; perianth tube funnel-
shaped, 5 mm long with lower narrow portion ± 1 mm
long, tepals oblanceolate, 20-30 x 7-10 mm. Stamens
yellow; filaments inserted at base of cup, free, 5-6 mm
long, minutely pilose in lower half; anthers parallel, 4
mm long. Style dividing opposite lower half of anthers,
branches ± 1 .5 mm long, divided for ± half their length.
Capsules oblong-ellipsoid, 7-9 x 5 mm long, fruiting
peduncles diverging, straight. Seeds subglobose, ± 2 mm
diam. Flowering time : Aug. Figure 1.
Distribution and ecology, known with certainty only
from a single locality south of Riviersonderend on the
Farm Fonteinkloof (Figure 2), where a small population,
numbering less than fifty plants, occurs in a remnant
patch of renosterveld vegetation, too stony to plough.
The plants are wedged among small vertical riffles of
shale on the crest of a hill as part of a Ruens Silcrete
Renosterveld community, a highly endangered veg-
etation type found as scattered pockets in the Overberg
region (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).
Diagnosis and relationships : the oblique conn with
tunics split along the basal ridge into clusters of con-
verging fibrils place Romulea pilosa in sect. Aggrega-
tae M.P.de Vos (1972), making it the ninth member of
this small group. Its relatively short, falcate, H-shaped
leaves 4-6 mm wide, with ciliate, winged margins, and
its salmon to orange flowers with a yellow cup, make
it instantly recognizable in the genus. Similar winged,
ciliate leaves are known only in two other species in
the genus, R. hirsuta Schltr. and R. tetragona M.P.de
Vos. Although associated in sect. Hirtae Beg. by De
Vos (1972) on the basis of their similar leaf morphol-
ogy, these two species have fundamentally different
conn tunic morphologies, leading Manning & Gold-
blatt (2001) to segregate them respectively to subgen.
Romulea sect. Cilatae (M.Pde Vos) J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt and subgen. Spatalanthus (Sweet) Baker. The
discovery of a third, evidently unrelated species with
similar, H-shaped and winged leaves now suggests that
this unusual leaf morphology has evolved independently
at least three times within the genus. The three species
concerned occupy quite different geographical regions
with differing ecology, and the adaptive value of this
leaf type is not immediately clear.
Within sect. Aggregatae , Romulea pilosa is evidently
most closely allied to R. dichotoma (Thunb.) Baker and
R. jugicola M.Pde Vos, both of which typically have
aerial stems, ciliate peduncles, and a solitary basal leaf
with ciliate rib margins. The leaves of R. dichotoma in
particular tend to have wider longitudinal grooves, with
the marginal ribs prominently expanded and almost
wing-like. Both species are found on clay soils in renos-
terveld communities in the southern Cape. R. jugicola ,
known only from the foothills of the Kammanassie Mtns
in the Fittle Karoo, is distinguished by its well-exserted
aerial stems, up to 30 mm tall, with a well-developed,
fibrous neck around the base, and orange-yellow peri-
anth; R. dichotoma is more widespread, extending from
Stanford to Humansdorp, and has mostly magenta or
rarely salmon-pink flowers with a yellow cup. It is most
evidently separated from R. pilosa by its generally taller
stem, up to 350 mm high, usually branched dichoto-
mously near the top, and narrower, distinctly 4-ribbed
leaves, 1-2 mm in diameter.
The leaves of Romulea pilosa are anatomically con-
sistent with sect. Aggregatae in their well-developed
sclerenchyma girders joining the primary vascular bun-
dles to the epidermis (Manning & Goldblatt 2001), an
evidently apomorphic character state that is only inter-
mittently developed in subgen. Romulea. Although gird-
ers are also developed in the secondary bundles in other
members of the series, they are almost confined to the
primary bundles in R. pilosa (occurring only rarely in
one or two secondary bundles near the wing margins
in some leaves). Stomata are present on the blade and
‘inner’ wing surfaces but are lacking on the ‘outer’ wing
surface, i.e. those making the acute angle along the leaf
margins.
Morphologically similar, H-shaped leaves have
evolved repeatedly in several genera of the Cape Iri-
daceae. Notable examples in Gladiolus sect. Homoglos-
sum are the Gladiolus gracilis-G. caeruleus-G. recur-
vus group in ser. Carinatus as well as most members
of ser. Homoglossum and Tristis; and some members of
Geissorhiza sect. Engysiphon. We have observed that the
wings in these species curve inward over the stomatif-
erous grooves when the plants are water-stressed, and
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
271
FIGURE 1. — Romulea pilosa , Manning 3220. A, whole plant; B, outer bract; C, inner bract; D, stamens and style; E, detail of leaf
margin; F, t/s leaf; G, detail of corm fibril clusters. Scale bars: A-C, 10 mm; D, 2.5 mm; E, 1 mm; F, 0.5 mm; G, 0.2 mm. Art-
ist: John Manning.
speculate that this mechanism facilitated the develop-
ment of a relatively broader photosynthetic leaf surface
while still controlling water loss.
History, described here from a population discovered
in August 2009 by Napier residents and dedicated con-
servationists, Cameron and Rhoda McMaster, the spe-
cies appears to have been first collected in 1932 or 1933
by Grace Neethling of Riviersonderend. This discovery
is represented by a fragmentary specimen in the Bolus
herbarium, comprising a solitary detached leaf and a sin-
gle dissected flower. The plant from which these parts
were picked was cultivated at Kirstenbosch but subse-
quently disappeared and thus no corm was preserved.
The fragments are accompanied by a coloured painting
of the floral parts showing the distinctive orange tepals
w'ith their yellow cup. Although initially intending to
describe the collection as a new species. De Vos (1972)
subsequently treated it as Romulea tetragona war. flavan-
dra M.P.de Vos (otherwise endemic to the southwest-
ern Karoo), although noting the anomalous colour of
the flowers of the Riviersonderend collection. With the
discovery of a wild population, it is now evident that
this plant is quite unrelated to R. tetragona and does
indeed represent a distinct species. The locality where
Miss Neethling found her plant is unknown, although
the Neethling family owned the Farm Bon Esperance at
the foot of the Riviersonderend Mtns at the time (Lewis
1947). Most of the natural vegetation below these moun-
tains has since disappeared under cultivation and we
will never know if her collection came from the present
locality or from another population in the vicinity.
272
Bothalia 4 1 .2 (2011)
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of Romulea pilosa, O; R. quartzi-
cola , •.
Additional material seen
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Riviersonderend, (-BB), fid.
[flowered] at Kirstenbosch, 24 Aug. 1933, G. Neethling s.n. BOL24789
(BOL).
2. Romulea quartzicola J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt, sp. nov.
Ad sectionem Ciliatae (M.P.de Vos) J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt pertinens et recognita florentia praecoci,
foliis relative brevibus obtusis subclavatis, floribus gran-
dis canarinis, tubo perianthii profundo 7-8 mm longo,
tepalis 20-22 x 6-10 mm, filamentis, 7-9 mm longis
quern antheris longioribus, bracteis ovatis vel subor-
bicularibus 8-13 mm longis, marginibus membranaceis
angustis ecoloratis vel purpureo-suffusis.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Kners-
vlakte. Farm Moedverloor, ± 15 km NE of Lutzville,
(-AD), 21 June 2010, A.D. Harrower & J.C. Manning
4395 (NBG, holo.; MO, iso.).
Plants 50-80 mm high; stem aerial, up to 35 mm
long, simple or with 1 branch. Conn subglobose, ± 10
mm diam., asymmetric, obliquely flattened towards
base with crescent-shaped basal ridge; tunics hard,
smooth, dark brown, split into numerous fine parallel
fibrils on basal ridge and into narrow teeth up to 5 mm
long above. Cataphylls 3, membranous, flushed green-
ish above ground. Foliage leaves (1)2, all basal, blades
mostly ± as long as flowering stem, cylindrical-subcla-
vate, obtuse, narrowly 4-grooved, 30-80 x (1.0-) 1.5—
2.5 mm; cauline leaf present only when lateral inflor-
escence developed, inserted midway or two thirds up
stem, much shorter than basal leaves, entirely sheathing
or with blade up to 30 mm long. Inflorescence of soli-
tary flowers; outer bracts broadly elliptical-suborbicular,
concave, obtuse, green with narrow, translucent (some-
times purplish tinted) membranous margins, 8-13 mm
long, inner bracts similar but with broader membranous
margins, ± as long as outer, notched apically. Flowers
deeply cup-shaped, 25-30 mm diam., cup 12-15 mm
deep, bright chrome-yellow (rarely peach-coloured),
with 3-5 inconspicuous dark veins at base of cup, rarely
Hushed copper or pale green on reverse, weakly clove-
scented; perianth tube funnel-shaped, 7-8 mm long
with lower narrow portion ± 1 mm long, tepals oblan-
ceolate, 20-22 x 6-10 mm. Stamens yellow; filaments
inserted at base of cup, lower 2^1 mm included within
perianth tube, free, pubescent in lower two thirds, espe-
cially towards base, 7-9 mm long; anthers parallel, 4-5
mm long, thecae well separated by broad connective
0.50-0.75 mm wide. Style dividing opposite upper half
of anthers, branches ± 3 mm long, divided for entire
length into six filiform branchlets. Capsules and seeds
unknown. Flowering time: mid-June to July. Figure 3.
Distribution and ecology’-, known so far from several
small populations on the Farm Moedverloor, northeast
of Futzville in the extreme southwestern Knersvlakte
(Figure 2). Plants are restricted to the drainage basin
of the Moedverloor River, where they are localized on
southern or southwest-trending slopes, typically just
below the crest of the quartzite outcrops that fringe the
eastern edge of the basin, but occasionally on the lower
slopes. The species is relatively common where it occurs
but populations never extend over a large area. Plants
grow among quartz pebbles only in relatively dense
stands of Knersvlakte Dwarf Vygieveld (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006), a dwarf succulent shrubland domi-
nated by various small Aizoaceae in the genera Argvro-
derma , Cheiridopsis, Conophytum and Monilaria. This
highly specific ecology appears to be determined largely
by the cooler aspect and by the associated higher pre-
cipitation. The rocky crests on which the species mostly
occurs face the ocean, and the localized presence of
lichens on the summit rocks suggests that coastal fogs,
which are a feature of the region in the autumn and win-
ter, play an important role in providing additional mois-
ture to these sites, as attested also by the relatively dense
associated succulent shrublets compared with adjacent
slopes with a more northerly aspect. The Moedverloor
basin has exposed an extensive and rather localized area
of these quarzite slopes, the Moedverloorberg to the
north being granitic and the hills to the south primarily
loamy sand. A localized distribution and low population
size is a characteristic of other quartz-loving species in
the region (Snijman & Harrower 2009). Focal changes
in soil chemistry, depth, particle size, aspect, insolation
and available moisture appear to be responsible for this
very patchy ecology (Schmiedel & Jurgens 1999).
Other locally endemic geophytes from the southwest-
ern Knersvlakte include Bulbine dactylopsoides and
B. haworthioides (Asphodelaceae), Lachenalia patula ,
Ornithogalum naviculum , and the recently described
Drimia fimbrimarginata (all Hyacinthaceae) (Snijman &
Harrower 2009).
The flowers open between 13:00-14:00 in the after-
noon and close in the evening near sunset. They remain
closed in cold and overcast weather.
Diagnosis and relationships : the conn with a fimbri-
ate basal ridge places Romulea quartzicola in sect. Cili-
atae (M.P.de Vos) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt of subgen.
Romulea , where it is distinguished by its early flower-
ing, relatively short, obtuse, subclavate leaves, large,
deeply funnel-shaped, canary-yellow flowers with tepals
20-22 x 6-10 mm and perianth tube 7-8 mm long, and
the relatively long filaments, 7-9 mm long, much longer
than the anthers. The bracts are ovate or suborbicular.
273
Bothaha 41,2 (2011)
8-13 mm long, and both the inner and outer bracts have
narrow, colourless or purple-flushed membranous bor-
ders. The leaves of R. quartzicola are morphologically
distinctive in broadening appreciably in the distal half,
thus somewhat clavate in appearance, but they are ana-
tomically simple in lacking vascular girders as well as
rib marginal bundles or strands. All four primary bun-
dles have incomplete sclerenchyma sheaths restricted to
phloem caps, and even these are absent in the second-
ary bundles. This is a relatively uncommon condition, as
most species in the section have complete sclerenchyma
bundle sheaths around the lateral primary bundles (De
Vos 1972; Manning & Goldblatt 2001). The leaves of
FIGURE 3. — Romulea quartzicola,
Harrower 2756. A, whole
plants; B, outer bract; C, inner
bract; D, stamens and style; E,
anther, outer face; F, details
of style branches; G, t/s leaf.
Scale bars: A-C, 10 mm; D,
E, 2.5 mm; F, 0.5 mm. Artist:
John Manning.
R. quartzicola are thus among the least sclerified in the
entire genus, matched in this regard, as far as is known,
only by R. namaquensis M.P.de Vos.
The combination of yellow flowers and green bracts
without the conspicuous, brown-streaked membranous
margins that characterize the Romulea pearsonii group
of species, places R. quartzicola in a small group of
sect. Ciliatae that comprises R. citrina Baker, R. ellip-
tica M.P.de Vos, R. lutea J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, R.
montana Beg. and R. sulphurea Beg. Among this group
it is readily distinguished from all except R. sulphurea
by the relatively long filaments, ± twice as long as the
274
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
anthers. The rarely collected R. sulphured, which was
represented only by the type (collected in 1897) until
we relocated it in 1999 (Manning & Goldblatt 2001),
is still known only from the Pakhuis Pass in the north-
ern Cedarberg, where it forms dense populations on
seasonally wet sandstone pavement, flowering in early
spring, in July and August. It is distinguished from R.
quartzicola not only by its ecology and distribution but
by its filiform leaves, ± 0.5 mm diam., smaller, sweetly
scented flowers with elliptical tepals 12-20 mm long,
mostly smaller bracts, 7-10 mm long, the inner with
broad, brown-speckled membranous margins, and by the
shorter anthers, 2. 5-3.0 mm long.
Perianth colour is an important character in Romulea
to the extent that species are either pink- or yellow-flow-
ered but never both. Plain yellow flowers without dark
blotches on the inner surface are uncommon in Romulea
and restricted to a handful of species of sect. Ciliatae,
only one of which, R. lutea J.C. Manning & Goldblatt,
has been recorded from southern Namaqualand. This
species, a recent discovery from sandy washes west of
Koekenaap (Manning & Goldblatt 2008), has plain,
golden yellow flowers superficially similar to those of R.
quartzicola but it differs not only in its later flowering,
August to September, but in its narrower leaves, ± 1 mm
in diameter, with only the lowermost leaf basal, shorter
perianth tube, ± 3 mm deep, and shorter filaments, 4 mm
long and ± as long as the anthers. The two species dif-
fer also in leaf anatomy. In R. lutea the lateral primary
bundles have complete sclerenchyma sheaths and the
secondary bundles have well-developed phloem caps
extending to the epidermis as girders. Both of these con-
ditions are lacking in R. quartzicola.
History, the species was originally collected as a
single fruit in July 2005. Seed was germinated in April
2006 in the nursery at Kirstenbosch Botanical Garden,
and four plants were grown to maturity. These flowered
for the first time on 6 June 2009, when it became clear
that they represented an undescribed species. Type mate-
rial was collected the following year.
Additional material seen
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Knersvlakte, Farm
Moedverloor, ± 15 km NE of Lutzville, (-AD), 15 May 2010 [flow-
ered in cultivation, plants originally collected 22 July 2005], A.D. Har-
rower 2756 (NBG); 21 June 2010, A.D. Harrower & J.C. Manning
4397 (NBG), 4399 (NBG).
NAME CHANGES AND NOMENCLATURAL CORRECTIONS
1 . The protologue of Trichonema pudica (Ker Gawler
1810), the basionym for Romulea pudica (Ker Gawl.)
Baker ( 1 877), includes a painting of a pink-flowered spe-
cies of Romulea with dark longitudinal streaks in a pale
cup. This plant was brought from the Cape by a Miss
Symonds and given to Messrs Whitley and Borme of
Brompton, London, in whose greenhouse it was raised.
They later provided the flowering specimen to the artist
who executed the painting reproduced in Curtis’s Botani-
cal Magazine. Depicting a plant with two basal leaves
and a symmetrical, bell-shaped conn with a neatly scal-
loped basal rim, this illustration clearly represents the
species currently known under the name R. amoena, a
narrow endemic of the Bokkeveld Mtns south of Nieu-
woudtville in Northern Cape. Ker Gawler (1810) cited
one specimen in the protologue, Ixia pudica Sol. ms in
Herb. Banks (now the herbarium of the British Museum
of Natural History). The plant so annotated by Solan-
der was collected by Oldenburg and has no date, precise
locality or number. De Vos (1972, 1983) identified it as
R. flava Lam. and we agree with her determination after
having examined a digital image of the specimen.
Ker Gawler first listed the name Ixia pudica when
he described the genus Trichonema (Ker Gawler 1802),
including it among one of several species that he
believed correctly belonged in his new genus. He later
(Ker Gawler 1804, 1809) listed ‘ Trichonema pudica
Gawl.’ as one of several species of Trichonema but
it was only in 1810 that the validating protologue was
published (Ker Gawler 1810). De Vos (1983) cited the
painting as the type (‘iconotype’) of T. pudica and we
endorse her action. The painting, showing a plant with
red perianth, pale, darkly striped cup, and two basal
leaves, differs sharply from the alternative choice of
type, the Oldenburg specimen, which has a single basal
leaf and apparently had a white perianth with a plain
yellow cup. Significantly, the trivial name, rose-flow-
ered trichonema, that accompanies the protologue, pro-
vides a direct and clear reference to the painting. Only
the painting, therefore, accords with the words and title
of the protologue and we formally designate it the lec-
totype. Although De Vos (1983) was not able to associ-
ate the painting (and thus the name) with any wild spe-
cies, we are confident that it is a good representation of
R. amoena (Beguinot 1907), the only known species of
this genus with a dark pink to red perianth with pale,
streaked cup, two basal leaves, and a bell-shaped conn
scalloped along the basal rim. We accordingly reduce R.
amoena to synonymy under R. pudica, a combination
provided by Baker (1877). Daniel Solander evidently
provided the inspiration for the name of the species but
the specimen bearing his annotation is not the type.
Romulea pudica (Sol. ex Ker Gawl.) Baker in Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society, Botany 16: 89 (1877). Tricho-
nema pudicum Sol. ex Ker Gawl: t. 1244 (1810) [T. pudi-
cum Sol. ex Ker Gawl.: 223 (1804) et sub t. 1225 (1809),
nom. nud.]. Ixia pudica (Sol. ex Ker Gawl.) Roem. &
Schult.: 377 (1817). Geissorhiza pudica (Sol. ex Ker
Gawl.) Klatt: 655 (1866). Bulbocodium pudicum (Sol.
ex Ker Gawl.) Kuntze: 700 (1891). Romulea rosea var.
pudica (Sol. ex Ker Gawl.) Baker: 42 (1896). Lectotype
here designated: South Africa, without precise locality,
illustration in Ker Gawl. in Curtis’s Botanical Magazine
31: t. 1244 (1810). [The syntype, without precise locality,
Oldenland s.n. annotated Ixia pudica by Solander (BM) =
R. flava Lam. is in serious conflict with the protologue.]
Romulea amoena Schltr. ex Beg.: 334 (1907), syn. nov. Type:
South Africa, [Northern Cape], Bokkeveld Mtns, Papelfontein [Pap-
kuilsfontein], Schlechter 10896 (G, holo.; BM, BOL, GRA, K, MO,
PRE, S, Z, iso.).
2. The phrase ‘ Blumen rosenroth klein (flowers
rose-red, small) constitutes the entire diagnosis for
C.F.Ecklon’s Romulea parviflora, which he collected on
the Cape Peninsula near Green Point. The species, typi-
fied by a specimen in the Stockholm Herbarium so anno-
tated by Ecklon (Nordenstam 1972), was determined as
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
275
R. obscura Klatt by De Vos ( 1972). Nordenstam ( 1972)
felt that this diagnosis was sufficient to validate Eck-
lon’s species, and that, as the earlier name it should thus
replace R. obscura. De Vos (1973) disagreed, regarded
Ecklon’s species as inadequately diagnosed and there-
fore invalidly published, and accordingly listed the name
in synonymy both under R. obscura var. obscura and
under R. rosea var. australis Ewert (De Vos 1972). Later,
in the Flora of southern Africa (De Vos 1983) she cited
it solely as a synonym of R. obscura var. obscura. This
species usually has yellow to apricot, occasionally pale
pink flowers (De Vos 1972), whereas R. rosea , includ-
ing its varieties, has pale to deep pink or red flowers.
We are of the opinion that the species is therefore better
assigned to R. rosea on the basis of flower colour. The
small flower size indicates that it should be assigned to
synonymy under R. rosea var. australis.
Romulea rosea var. australis (Ewart) M.P.de
Vos in Journal of South African Botany, Supplement 9:
254 (1972). Romulea cruciata var. australis Ewart: 43
(1907). Type: Australia, Victoria, near Melbourne, Tovey
s.n. [MEL, lecto., designated by De Vos: 252 (1972);
BOL, iso.].
Romulea parviflora Eckl.: 19 (1827). Trichonema parviflorum
(Eckl.) Steud.: 702 (1841), syn. nov. Type: South Africa, [Western
Cape], Cape Peninsula, Green Point, Sept. 19-24, Ecklon s.n. (S,
holo.).
3. First described as Ixia reflexa by Thunberg (1811),
the epithet was transferred to Romulea by Ecklon
(1827), who explicitly cited Thunberg’s species as the
basionym. Ixia reflexa of Thunberg is, however, a homo-
nym for a species of that name described by Andrews
(1797) [now, incidentally, Ixia scillaris L.]. Ecklon's use
of the name is to be treated nomenclaturally as a new
name dating from 1827 (McNeil et al. 2006: Art. 58.1)
but it remains typified by the type of Thunberg’s homo-
nym. The taxon is conspecific with R. flava var. flava
(De Vos 1972; 1983). Beguinot (1908), and later De Vos,
however, mistakenly regarded Ecklon’s name as typi-
fied by his (Ecklon’s) own collections bearing that name,
which are a form of R. rosea , and accordingly treated
them as var. reflexa of that species. Based on the actual
type, however, R. rosea var. reflexa is a nomenclatu-
ral synonym of R. flava. The variety var. reflexa sensu
Beguinot, a local endemic of the Riversdale District,
then requires a new name and its only synonym, at spe-
cies rank, is R. muirii , which is available for the taxon.
We accordingly provide the combination below.
Romulea rosea var. muirii (N.E.Br. ) J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt, comb, et stat. nov. Romulea muirii N.E.Br.:
467 (1932). Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], Rivers-
dale, Muir 4848 (K, holo.).
R. rosea var. reflexa sensu Beg. (1908) et De Vos (1972), non
(Eckl.) Beg. (1908) [= R. flava (Lam.) M.P.de Vos].
Romulea flava (Lam.) M.P.de Vos in Journal of
South African Botany, Supplement 9: 98 (1972). Ixia
flava Lam.: 109 (1791). Type: without precise locality or
collector [P: Herb. Lamarck, lecto., designated by M.P.
deVos: 99(1972)].
R. rosea var. reflexa (Eckl.) Beg.: 158 (1908). R. reflexa Eckl.: 18
(1827), as nom. nov. pro Ixia reflexa Thunb.: 55 (1811), hom. illegit.,
non 1. reflexa Andr. (1797), syn. nov. Type: South Africa, without pre-
cise locality, Thunberg s.n. UPS-THUNB984 [UPS-THUNB, lecto.,
designated by De Vos: 27 (1983)].
4. In her Flora of southern Africa account of Rom-
ulea, De Vos (1983) recognized Ixia neglecta Schult.
(1822) as an earlier name for what was until then R.
oliveri M.P.de Vos, a narrow endemic of the Kamies-
berg in Namaqualand, Northern Cape. While true, the
combination that she proposed in Romulea is techni-
cally a new name because she deliberately excluded
the type of both I. neglecta and its synonym Tricho-
nema speciosum Ker Gawl. Her new name is, however,
a homonym for the Mediterranean R. neglecta Jord. &
Fourr. (1868). Ixia neglecta of Schultes (1822) was itself
a new name in Ixia for Trichonema speciosum (Ker
Gawler 1804) — not the later account of the species in
1812 cited by De Vos — because I. speciosa Andrews
bars its transfer to Ixia. The type of T. speciosum (and
of/, neglecta Schult.) is a plate in Andrews (1801 ) titled
Ixia bulbocodium var. flore speciosissimo , a polynomial.
Ker Gawler ’s Trichonema speciosa is based solely on
the Andrews illustration and not, as De Vos and others
believed, on the illustration in Curtis s Botanical Maga-
zine-. t. 1476 (Ker Gawler 1812), which is the type that
De Vos cited for R. neglecta. This plate is, nevertheless,
evidently the same species (and probably the same plant
or its descendants) as was illustrated by Andrews. Baker
(1877) provided the combination R. speciosa , citing Ixia
bulbocodium var. speciosa Andrews (in error for the
polynomial listed above), and Ker Gawler ’s Trichonema
speciosa. In addition. Baker listed in synonymy R. tabu-
laris Eckl., at the time a manuscript name on specimens
distributed by Ecklon, later R. tabularis Eckl. ex Beg.
in 1907. Baker also correctly listed in synonymy, Ixia
neglecta Schult.
The type of Trichonema speciosa and Ixia neglecta
is a painting of a red-flowered Romulea , the dark tepal
cup pale at the base and the reverse of the outer tepals
boldly striped with pale and dark longitudinal lines. The
poorly rendered conn seems consistent with R. neglecta
but the plant is illustrated with one basal and one sub-
basal leaf. The bracts are consistent with R. neglecta
as understood by De Vos, the inner with membranous,
darkly streaked margins. Andrews’s plant was provided
in 1801 by George Hibbert, Member of Parliament and
patron of botany, who we suspect received conns from
James Niven. Hibbert had commissioned Niven in 1798
to collect plants for him at the then Cape Colony and
Niven is known to have visited the Kamiesberg in 1799,
where he collected specimens of the endemic Moraea
longiflora Ker Gawk, which was illustrated in Curtis’s
Botanical Magazine', t. 712 (Ker Gawler 1804; Goldblatt
1986: 104). Thus this early illustration of a then remote
Namaqualand endemic is not unprecedented.
The presence of two, rather than a single basal leaf,
is not consistent with Romulea neglecta , which usually
has a single basal leaf, but the anomaly may be the result
of its cultivation in England or of a misrepresentation by
the artist. The plant illustrated later in Curtis’s Botani-
cal Magazine however, also from stock derived from
Hibbert's introduction, has a single basal leaf. Because
of this inconsistency, we designate an epitype for R. spe-
ciosa, the name that must now be applied to the species.
As the type collection of R. oliveri still represents the
276
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
only actual specimen of R. speciosa that is known, we
designate this collection as the epitype.
Romulea speciosa (Ker Gawl.) Baker in Journal
of the Linnean Society, Botany 16: 89 (1877). Tricho-
nema speciosum Ker Gawl.: 223 (1804). Ixia neglecta
Schult.: 279 (1822), nom. nov. pro Trichonema spe-
ciosum Ker Gawl. [non Ixia speciosa Andrews (1801)].
Bulbocodium speciosum (Ker Gawl.) Kuntze: 700
(1891). Type. South Africa, without precise locality,
possibly collected by J. Niven, illustration in Andrews
(1801), The botanist’s repository 3: t. 170 ‘ Ixia bulboc-
odium var . flore speciosissimo (1801). Epitype: South
Africa, [Northern Cape], Kamiesberg, Farm Welkom, 14
Sept. 1970, Oliver 3169 (NBG, epi. ! ; PRE, iso.).
R. oliveri M.P.de Vos: 116 (1972). Type: South Africa, [Northern
Cape], Kamiesberg, Farm Welkom, 14 Sept. 1970, Oliver 3169 (NBG,
holo.!; PRE, iso.).
R. neglecta M.P.de Vos: 29 (1983), horn, illegit., non R. neglecta
Jord. & Fourr. (1868). Type: South Africa, without precise locality,
possibly collected by J. Niven, illustration in Curtis’s Botanical Maga-
zine 14: t. 1476 ' Ixia speciosa' ( Ker Gawler 1812).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Roy Gereau, Missouri Botanical Garden,
and Kanchi Gandhi, Harvard University, for invaluable
assistance with nomenclatural questions and Mary Stif-
fler, research librarian, Missouri Botanical Garden, for
cheerfully providing references not available electroni-
cally. Type material was collected under a permit from
CapeNature.
REFERENCES
ANDREWS, H. 1 797. Ixia reflexa. Reflex flowered ixia. The botanist's
repository , vol. 1 . Bensley [for author], London.
ANDREWS, H. 1801. Ixia bulbocodium var. flore speciosissimo. The
botanist’s repository , vol. 3. Bensley [for author], London.
BAKER, J.G. 1877 [as 1878]. Systema Iridearum. Journal of the Lin-
nean Society, Botany 16: 61-180.
BAKER. J.G. 1896. Iridaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 7-71. Reeve, Ashford.
BEGUINOT, A. 1907. Diagnoses Romulearum novarum vel minus
cognitarum (Schluss). Botanische Jahrbiicher fur Systematik 38:
323-339.
BEGUINOT, A. 1908. Revisione delle Romulea dell’ erbario Delessert
(Ginevra). Annuaire du Conservatoire et du Jardin Botaniques
de Geneve 11-12: 144-163.
BROWN, N.E. 1932. Romulea rosea. The Gardeners Chronicle, ser.
3, 92: 467.
DE VOS, M.P. 1972. The genus Romulea in South Africa. Journal of
South African Botany, Suppl. vol. 6. National Botanic Gardens
of South Africa, Kirstenbosch.
DE VOS, M.P. 1973. Note on Romulea parviflora Ecklon. Journal of
South African Botany 39: 111.
DE VOS, M.P. 1983. Romulea. In O.A. Leistner, Flora of southern Afri-
ca 7, 2, fascicle 2: 10-73. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
ECKLON, C.F. 1827. Topographisches Verzeiclwiss der Pflanzen-
sammlung von C.F. Ecklon. Reiseverein, Esslingen.
EWART, A.J. 1907. Contribution to the flora of Australia. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of Victoria 1 9: 43.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1986. The moraeas of southern Africa. Annals of
Kirstenbosch Botanical Garden 14. National Botanic Gardens,
Cape Town in association with the Missouri Botanical Garden,
St. Louis.
GOLDBLATT, P„ BERNHARDT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2002. Flor-
al biology of Romulea (Iridaceae: Crocoideae): a progression
from a generalist to a specialist pollination system. Adansonia
24: 243-262.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2008. The iris family: natural
history and classification. Timber Press, Oregon.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT. L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum. Part 1: the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
JORDAN, C.T.A. & FOURREAU, J.P. 1868. Breviarurn plantarum
novarum. Savy, Paris.
KER GAWLER, J. 1802. Trichonema cruciatum. Channel-leaved tri-
chonema. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 16: t. 575.
KER GAWLER, J. 1804 [as 1805]. Ensatorum ordo. Konig & Sims
Annals of Botany 1: 219-247.
KER GAWLER, J. 1809. Trichonema roseum. Rose-coloured tricho-
nema. Curtis s Botanical Magazine 30: t. 1225.
KER GAWLER, J. 1810. Trichonema pudicum. Blush-coloured tricho-
nema. Curtis 's Botanical Magazine 3 1 : t. 1244.
KER GAWLER, J. 1812. Trichonema speciosa. Crimson trichonema.
Curtis's Botanical Magazine 14: t. 1476.
KLATT, F.W. 1866. Revisio Iridearum. Linnaea 34: 537-689.
KUNTZE, O. 1891. Revisio generum plantarum, vol. 2. Felix, Leipzig.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P.M. 1791. Tableau encylopedique et methodique
botanique, vol. 1. Pancoucke, Paris.
LEWIS, J.G. 1947. Gladiolus stokoei. The Flowering Plants of Africa
26: t. 1004.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2001. A synoptic review of Rom-
ulea (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) in sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian
Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes,
and a new infrageneric classification. Adansonia, ser. 3, 23:
59-108.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2004. Two new species of Rom-
ulea (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) from the western Karoo, Northern
Cape and notes on infrageneric classification and range exten-
sions. Bothalia 34: 17-22.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLBLATT, P. 2006. New species of Iridaceae
from the Hantam-Roggeveld centre of endemism, and the
Bokkeveld, Northern Cape, South Africa. Bothalia 36: 139-145.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2008. Romulea lutea and R. tubu-
losa (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), two new species from Namaqua-
land, South Africa. Bothalia 38: 78-82.
McNEILL, J„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K., NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J., SILVA, P.C., SKOG, J.E., WIERSMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. (eds). 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the seventeenth Inter-
national Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Reg-
num Vegetabile 146. Gantner, Liechtenstein.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1972. Types of Ecklon’s ‘Topographisches
Verzeichniss’ in the Swedish Musem of Natural History in
Stockholm. Journal of South African Botany 38: 277-298.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A 1817. Systema vegetabilium, vol. 1.
Cotta, Stuttgart.
SCHMIEDEL, U. & JURGENS, N. 1999. Community structure on unu-
sual habitat islands: quartz-fields in the Succulent Karoo, South
Africa. Plant Ecology 142: 57-69.
SCHULTES, J.A. 1822. Mantissa systematis vegetabilium, vol. 1.
Cotta, Stuttgart.
SNI.IMAN, D.A. & HARROWER, A.D. 2009. A new species of Drimia
(Urgineoideae) from the Knersvlakte, Western Cape, South Afri-
ca. Bothalia 39: 233-237.
STEUDEL, E.T. 1841. Nomenclator botanicus, edn 2. Cotta, Stuttgart.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1811. Flora capensis. Edman, Uppsala.
Bothalia 41,2: 277-282 (2011)
FSA contributions 19: Asteraceae: Anthemideae: Eumorphia
N. SWELANKOMO*
INTRODUCTION
The genus Eumorphia DC. belongs to the tribe
Anthemideae in the subfamily Asteroideae of the family
Asteraceae. It consists of six species and two subspecies
(Hilliard & Burtt 1982), which are endemic to southern
Africa. It occurs widely in southern Africa in Limpopo,
Mpumalanga, Swaziland, Free State, KwaZulu-Natal.
Lesotho, Western and Eastern Cape (Herman et al.
2003).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A total of seven Eumorphia taxa were studied from
herbarium specimens housed in PRE. In each species,
morphological characters were investigated. The length
of the corolla, length and width of the involucre, length
of the style and ovary, number of ray florets, where pos-
sible, and length of cypselae were measured with the aid
of a Bausch & Lomb StereoZoom® Series microscope.
Two cypselae in each taxon, except in the case of E.
swaziensis and E. corymbosa, were examined by means
of a scanning electron microscope (JSM-840, JEOL,
Tokyo, Japan). Anthers were studied under a dissecting
and light microscope and photographs were taken with
a digital camera (Canon Powershot S80 Digital Camera)
mounted on the light microscope (Olympus Vanox-S).
Type specimens seen on the website are distinguished by
the code e! in citations below. Acronyms for herbaria are
listed in Holmgren et al. (1990) and in Smith & Willis
(1999).
Eumorphia DC., Prodromus 6: 2 (1838); Harvey:
153 (1865); Kallersjo: 538 (1985); Bremer & Hum-
phries: 94 (1993); Bremer: 448 (1994); Herman et al:
137 (2000); Oberprieler et al.: 355 (2007); Oberprieler et
al.: 643 (2009). Type species: E. dregeana DC.
Shrubs or shrublets, glabrous or pubescent. Leaves
opposite, alternate in E. davyi and E. swaziensis, eri-
coid, sometimes clustered, entire or lobed. Capitula
heterogamous, radiate, terminal, solitary or corymbose
in E. corymbosa and E. swaziensis, shortly peduncu-
late or subsessile. Involucre campanulate to subglo-
bose or cylindrical in E. corymbosa. Involucral bracts
in 3-5 rows, outer sometimes with 2-5 glands on back
near apex, inner ciliate near apex, sometimes all with
broad, membranous apices. Receptacle flat or con-
vex, rarely conical, paleate or sometimes epaleate in E.
davyi ; paleae longer than disc florets, linear, sometimes
with bent, apical appendage. Ray florets female, fer-
tile; corolla white sometimes flushed rose-pink, lamina
* Biosystematics Research and Biodiversity Collections Division,
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag XI 01, Pre-
toria, 0001. E-mail: N.Swelankomo@sanbi.org.za.
MS. received: 2011-02-23.
oblong to linear, 3-toothed, 2-4 times as long as tube,
glandular. Style slightly branched to branched with stig-
matic areas along edges. Disc florets bisexual, fertile,
yellow; corolla tube sometimes campanulate above, with
5 ovate lobes. Anthers minutely caudate with linear, api-
cal appendages; endothecial tissue polarized. Style lin-
ear, branched, truncate, branches with stigmatic areas
along edges. Cypsela ribbed, non-myxogenic, cylindri-
cal, minutely papillose especially on ribs, with dentate
or entire apical rim. Pappus absent. Figure 1 A-C.
Etymology r. the generic name Eumorphia is derived
from the Greek words, eu- meaning well and morphe
meaning form; referring to the neatness of the foliage
(Jackson 1990: 91 ).
Conservation status: according to the latest Red List
of South African plants (Raimondo et al. 2009), all spe-
cies are listed as LC (Least Concern).
Key to species
la Capitula corymbosely arranged, < 5 mm diam.:
2a Leaves opposite, narrowly linear, entire 1 . E. corymbosa
2b Leaves alternate, mostly trifid just above middle of stem
2. E. swaziensis
lb Capitula solitary, > 5 mm diam.:
3a Leaves alternate 3. E. davyi
3b Leaves opposite:
4a Subshrub up to 0.6 m tall, receptacle epaleate or with few
marginal paleae 4. E. prostrata
4b Erect shrubs to 1m tall, receptacle paleate:
5a Leaves linear-terete, closely imbricate, up to 3.5 mm
long 5. E. dregeana
5b Leaves entire or 3-lobed, up to 8 mm long 6. E. sericea
1. Eumorphia corymbosa E. Phillips in Journal
of South African Botany 16: 20 (1950). Type: Western
Cape, 3222 (Beaufort West): on top of Molteno Pass,
5500' [1804 m], (-BA), May, J.P.H. Acocks 14340,
(PRE, holo.!).
Woody subshrub, 0. 1-1.0 m high, single-stemmed
at base becoming branched, glabrous; stem very rough.
Leaves opposite, narrowly linear, entire, upper 4-5 x 1 .2
mm, lower 10-18 x 1.2 mm, some clustered at nodes,
acuminate. Capitula heterogamous, radiate, small, 5 x
2.5 mm when pressed, corymbose at ends of branches,
shortly pedunculate. Involucre cylindrical; involucral
bracts in 5 rows, imbricate, glabrous; outer ovate. 1 x
0.5 mm, membranous along edges; middle ovate-lanceo-
late, l.lxl mm, membranous along edges; inner 5 x 1
mm, lacerate, tips membranous. Receptacle flat, paleate;
paleae linear-lanceolate, 2 mm long, almost as long as
disc florets. Ray florets female, white; corolla limb glan-
dular. 3 mm long, 3-toothed; corolla tube shorter than
limb, sparsely glandular. Style terete, 1.5 mm long,
branches linear, obtuse, 0.4 mm long. Ovary ellipsoid,
ribbed, glabrous. Disc florets bisexual, fertile, yellow;
corolla tube 1.2 mm long, glandular; corolla limb 1
mm long, glandular, 5-lobed; lobes ovate, 0.2 mm long.
278
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
FIGURE 1, — A-C, scanning electron micrographs of cypsela of E.
davyi, Brusse 5010: A, surface with papillae especially on ribs;
B, surface at higher magnification; C, showing apical rim.
Anthers linear, minutely caudate, with lanceolate api-
cal appendage. Style terete, branches linear, truncate, 2
mm long. Ovary’ 1.2 mm long, ± ellipsoid, slightly stri-
ate, glabrous. Cypsela 2 mm long, glabrous, cylindri-
cal, minutely papillose especially on ribs, crowned with
thickened apical rim. Pappus absent. Flowering time :
Feb.-Mar.
Distribution and habitat'. Eumorphia corymbosa is
endemic to the Western Cape in the Beaufort West Divi-
sion, from the National Park, Mountain View, down to
the foot of the Nuweveld Mtns as far as Molteno Pass
(Figure 2), at I 000-1 828 m. It grows in seasonal wet
soils along rivers and in marshy habitats.
Notes'. Eumorphia cotymbosa can be distinguished
from other species in the genus by the small corym-
bosely arranged capitula at the branch endings; cylindri-
cal involucre and opposite leaves.
Other specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3222 (Beaufort West): Karoo National Park,
Mountain View, (-BA), 2 Jan. 1985, Shearing 828 (PRE); near Abra-
hamspoort Farm, on top of Nuweveldsberg Plateau, (-BA), 9 Mar. 1990,
Viok 2276 (PRE); foot of Nuweveld Mtns, on bank of small river flow-
ing at foot of mountain, (-BA), 15 Feb. 1978, Gibbs Russell. Robinson.
Herman & Downing 235 (PRE); Mountain View Farm, among dolerite
boulders at top of hill, (-BA), 14 Feb. 1978, Gibbs Russell, Robinson.
Herman & Downing 124 (PRE); Matjieskloof, 24 miles [38.4 km] north
of Beaufort West, (-BA), 16 May 1950, Acocks 15893 (PRE).
2. Eumorphia swaziensis Compton in Journal of
South African Botany 33: 300 (1967). Type: Swaziland,
2631 (Mbabane): hill northeast of Mbabane, (-AC),
4000' [I 312 m], 15 Mar. I960, R.H. Compton 29963,
(SDNH, holo. e!; PRE, two sheets!, NBG e!, iso.).
Small, mainly glabrous shrub, 0.3-0. 6 m high, with
erect woody stems, densely branched in upper florif-
erous parts. Leaves alternate, very numerous, erecto-
patent, mostly trifid just above the middle; rachis and
lobes filiform, fle.xuous, apiculate, lobes subopposite,
up to 20 mm long; many leaves in upper parts of stems
undivided, filiform. Inflorescence irregularly corymbose,
capitula numerous, erect, each borne on short pedun-
cle, subtended by short linear bract; peduncle and bract
finely and sparsely hairy. Involucre ±5x2 mm, com-
pact, campanulate, glabrous. Involucral bracts'. 3 rows,
imbricate; outer ovate, 1.2 x 0.5 mm; middle 2.2 x 1
mm; inner 3.5 x 1.1 mm, with narrowly membranous-
fimbriate margins. Receptacle paleate; paleae mem-
branous, linear, slightly shorter than disc florets. Ray
florets 5, female, white; corolla limb broadly oblong to
ovate, ±3x2 mm, shortly 3-lobed, glabrous; corolla
tube sparsely glandular, 1 mm long. Style linear, slightly
curved, 0.1 mm long with stigmatic areas along edges.
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of Eumorphia corymbosa , ■; E.
davvi , •; E. dregeana , *; E. prostrata , A; and E. swaziensis,
+ .
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
279
Ovary 1.8 mm long, slightly striate. Disc florets bisex-
ual, 5-lobed, yellow; lobes ovate, 0.1 mm long; corolla
glandular; corolla limb 1 mm long; corolla tube 1
mm long. Anthers minutely caudate, with short api-
cal appendages; filaments thickened. Style 2 mm long,
branched, style branches linear, truncate, 0.15 mm long,
with stigmatic areas along edges. Ovary linear, 1.1 mm
long, slightly striate. Cypsela: mature ones not seen.
Pappus absent. Flowering time : Mar.-Apr.
Distribution and habitat : Eumorphia swaziensis, as
the name suggests, is endemic to Swaziland, where it
occurs in grassland on the hilltops, at 1 219-1 372 m
around Mbabane (Figure 2).
Notes : Eumorphia swaziensis can be distinguished
from other species in the genus by having alternate
leaves; irregularly corymbose inflorescences and cam-
panulate involucres.
Specimen examined
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Black Umbuluzi Valley, (-AC),
24 Mar. 1978, Kemp 1304 (PRE).
3. Eumorphia davyi Bolus in Transactions of the
South African Philosophical Society 16: 387 (1906);
Retief & Herman: 306 (1997). Type: Eastern Transvaal
[Mpumalanga], 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Graskop, near
Pilgrim’s Rest, (-DD), 29 Jan. 1906, J. Burn Davy 1474,
(BOL, holo. e!; PRE!, K e! , iso.).
Ericoid shrub, 0.18-2.0 m high, single-stemmed at
base becoming branched only in upper third, forming
a compact, rounded bush, glabrous. Stem very rough.
Leaves alternate, imbricate, up to 1 1 x 0.5 mm, glabrous,
acute, mucronulate. Capitula shortly pedunculate or sub-
sessile, radiate. Involucre campanulate, 5-6 x 6 mm,
finely hairy. Involucral bracts in 3 rows, imbricate; outer
narrow, 3^1 x 0.5 mm, slightly hairy; middle lanceolate,
4- 6 x 1 mm, acuminate, lacerate membranous; inner
with ovate apex, 6-7 x 1 mm, membranous, discolor-
ous. Receptacle conical, epaleate. Ray florets female,
fertile, white; corolla limb oblong, 3-toothed, 7 mm
long; corolla tube 2 mm long. Style up to 1.8 mm long,
linear, branched, style branches 0.2 mm long, round
with stigmatic areas along edges. Ovaiy 3 mm long,
slightly striate. Disc florets many, bisexual, fertile, yel-
low; corolla limb 1 mm long; corolla tube 0.8 mm long,
5- lobed; lobes ovate, 0.15 mm long. Anthers minutely
caudate, apex round; filaments thickened. Style linear,
1.8 mm long, branched, style branches 0.2 mm long,
truncate with stigmatic areas along edges. Ovary 1.8
mm long. Cypsela closely ribbed, slightly curved, 2.2
mm long, glabrous but minutely papillose especially on
ribs, crowned with thickened apical rim. Pappus absent.
Flowering time : Sept.-April.
Distribution and liabitaf. Eumorphia davyi is found
in Mpumalanga at Graskop, Pilgrim's Rest and as far
north as Mariepskop, and in Limpopo Province in
Polokwane [Pietersburg] and The Downs (Figure 2) at
1 200-2 286 m. E. davyi grows in grassveld.
Notes : Eumorphia davyi is named in honour of
Joseph Burtt Davy (1870-1940), a British botanist,
founder of the Pretoria National Herbarium, a student
of the flora of California, agriculturist, sylviculturist and
ecologist (Stafleu & Richard 1976). E. davyi can be dis-
tinguished from other species in the genus by alternate
leaves and a conical, epaleate receptacle.
Other specimens examined
LIMPOPO. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): The Downs, (-AA), Nov.
1918, Rogers 21557, 22003 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): at top of Mariepskop,
(-DB), 15 Jan. 1960, Van der Schijff 4835 (PRE); Mount Sheba, road up
mountain from Mount Sheba Hotel to main Lydenburg-Pilgrims’s Rest tar
road, (-DC), 17 Apr. 1987, Brusse 5010 (PRE); Graskop, (-DD), 28 Mar.
\919, Kluge 1845 (PRE).
4. Eumorphia prostrata Bolus in Transactions of
the South African Philosophical Society 16: 388 (1906);
Hilliard: 332 (1977). Type: Eastern Cape, 3028 (Matatiele):
Barkly East, summit Doodman’s Krans Mtn, (-CA), 8 Mar.
1904, E.E. Galpin, 6700. (BOL, holo. e!; K e! , PRE, two
sheets!, SAM e!, iso.).
Low, erect, spreading subshrub, up to 0.6 m high,
often prostrate over rock sheets or hanging down cliff
faces; branches sericeous, soon glabrous, old ones rough
with leaf scars, often rooting, twigs closely leafy. Leaves
opposite, sericeous, silvery, hairs appressed, primary
leaves linear or 2- or 3-forked at tips, up to 1 0 x 1.5 mm,
appearing fascicled from closely leafy axillary shoots.
Capitula solitary, terminal, shortly pedunculate, radiate.
Involucre campanulate, up to 7 x 9 mm when pressed,
villous. Involucral bracts in 3 rows, imbricate; outer
narrowly ovate, 2. 5-5. 5 x 0.5 mm; middle obtuse, 5.5-
6.0 x 1.1 mm, tips membranous; inner oblong, 6. 5-7.0 x
1.1 mm, discolorous, membranous. Receptacle epaleate
or with a few marginal paleae. Ray florets female,
3-toothed, white tinged pink at base or sometimes at
back; corolla limb 5-7 mm long; corolla tube 1.8 long.
Style up to 2.2 mm long, branched, style branches 0.8
mm long, with stigmatic areas along edges. Ovary 1.2
mm long, slightly striate. Disc florets bisexual, 5-lobed,
yellow; lobes ovate, 0.1 mm long; corolla limb 2 mm
long; corolla tube 1 mm long. Anthers minutely caudate,
apical appendage elongated, obtuse, filaments thicken-
ed. Style up to 2.8 mm long, slightly branched, style
branches 0.2 mm long with stigmatic areas along edges
and papillate appendages. Ovary 1.1 mm long. Cypsela
narrowly cylindric, 2 mm long, closely ribbed, minutely
papillose especially on ribs, crowned with thickened api-
cal rim. Pappus absent. Flowering time'. Dec.-Apr. Fig-
ure 3.
Distribution and habitat'. Eumorphia prostrata is only
known from a small area of the high Drakensberg, from
Tina Head (Doodman's Krans and Naudesnek) where
the boundaries of Lesotho, the Barkly East and Maclear
Districts meet, to Thamathu Pass (Bushman’s Nek area)
and the Drakensberg Garden area in Underberg District,
KwaZulu-Natal (Hilliard 1977), at 1 830-2 970 m (Fig-
ure 2). In its natural environment, it appears to tolerate
extreme cold (-10°C) in winter, strong buffeting winds
and fairly high daytime temperatures in summer (Oliver
1989). E. prostrata grows in mountain grassveld in sea-
sonally wet areas.
Notes', although it seems close to Eumorphia seri-
cea, this species has a prostrate habit and a receptacle
epaleate or with a few marginal paleae.
280
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 3. — Eumorphia prostrata. A, habit; B, leaf surface; C, ray floret; D, disc floret, Hoener 1722. Scale bar; A, 10 mm; B-D, 0.33 mm. Artist:
Gillian Condy.
Specimens examined
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): Bushman’s Nek, Tha-
mathu Pass, (-CC), 4 Nov.1976, Hilliard & Burtt 8930 (PRE); vicin-
ity of Tarn Cave above Bushman’s Nek, (-CC), 20 Jan. 1984, Hilliard
& Burtt 17400 (PRE); Thamatuwe (= Thamathu) Pass, (-CC), 17
Jan. 1 969, Killick & Vahrmeijer 3996 ( PRE).
LESOTHO. — 2929 (Underberg): Sehlabathebe National Park,
Matsa a Mafikeng, (-CC), 16 Dec. 1967, Hoener 1722 (PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): Rhodes gravel road/jeep
track between Naudesnek and Ben Macdhui, (-CA), 12 Dec. 1999,
Koekemoer 1632 (PRE).
5. Eumorphia dregeana DC., Prodromus 6: 3
(1838); Harv.: 153 (1865). Type: Eastern Cape, 3124
(Hanover): Middelburg, Sneeuweberg between Kompas-
berg and Rhenosterberg, 5000-6000' [1 640-1 964 m],
(- DC), Sept., Drege s.n., (G-DC, holo. e! ; MO e!, M el,
PRE!, SAM e!,Ee!,Pe!,K e!, NBG e!, iso.).
Multi-stemmed, erect subshrub, 0. 3-1.0 m high.
Leaves linear-terete, closely imbricate, opposite, slightly
pubescent, up to 3.5 mm long, ± 1 mm broad, entire.
Capitula shortly pedunculate, radiate, solitary. Involu-
cre campanulate, 4-7 mm wide when pressed. Involu-
cral bracts in 3 rows, imbricate; outer ovate, glabrous
or slightly pubescent, 2 x 1 mm; middle 2.2 x 1.2 mm;
inner 2.5 x 1.25 mm, obtuse with membranous tips.
Receptacle paleate; palea membranous, linear, 4 mm
long. Ray florets female, 3-toothed, white; corolla limb
5 mm long; corolla tube 1 mm long. Style up to 1.2 mm
long, slightly branched, style branches 0.8 mm long,
with stigmatic areas along edges. Ovary 2 mm long,
slightly striate. Disc florets bisexual, fertile, 5-lobed, yel-
low; lobes ovate, 0.2 mm long; corolla limb glandular,
1.2 mm long; corolla tube glandular, I mm long. Anthers
minutely caudate, apical appendage elongated, obtuse.
Style up to 1 .2 mm long, branched, style branches 0.25
mm long with stigmatic areas along edges and pap-
illate appendages. Ovaty 1.5 mm long, slightly stri-
ate. Cypsela closely ribbed, 1.5-1. 8 mm long, slightly
curved, glabrous but minutely papillose especially on
ribs, crowned with thickened apical rim. Pappus absent.
Flowering time : Feb.-Apr.
Distribution and habitat'. Eumorphia dregeana occurs
in the southeastern Free State and the northwestern
Eastern Cape, at 1 311-1 980 m (Figure 2). According
to specimens in the National Herbarium, E. dregeana
grows in False Mountain Renosterveld (Karoo Escarp-
ment Grassland), on sandy slopes and in vleis.
Notes'. Eumorphia dregeana is named in honour of
Jean Franyois (Johann Franz) Drege (1794-1881), a Ger-
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
281
man plant collector in South Africa (1826-1834) (Stafleu
& Richard 1976). E. dregeana can be distinguished from
other species in the genus by having closely imbricate,
opposite leaves and paleate receptacles.
Specimens examined
FREE STATE. — 2927 (Maseru): Thaba Phatshwa Mtn, south of
Tweespruit, high up on eastern slope of mountain, (-AC), 3 Apr. 1973,
Muller 1163 (PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3124 (Hanover): Cradock, Wapadsberg, pla-
teau, (-DD), 28 Mar. 1947, Acocks 13552 (PRE). 3125 (Steynsburg):
Middelburg, Leeukop Farm, (-DB), 12 Mar. 1950, Theron 746 (PRE).
3224 (Graaff-Reinet): Oudeberg, (-DD), Apr. 1890, Bolus 1063 (PRE).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3124 (Hanover): Noupoort, 11 km from
Noupoort on road to Colesberg via Oorlogspoort, (-BB), 3 Apr. 1981,
Herman 533 (PRE).
6. Eumorphia sericea J.M.Wood & M.S. Evans
in Journal of Botany 35: 488 (1897); Grierson: t. 608
(1972); Hilliard: 332 (1977). Type: Natal, summit of
Drakensberg, near Bushman's River Pass, 8000-10 000'
[2 624-3 280], Apr. 1896, M.S. Evans 751, (NH, holo.;
PRE!, K, iso.).
Key to subspecies of Eumorphia sericea
6a Plant with thick, silky, woolly indumentum, cypsela crowned by
a thickened slightly lobulate rim 6a. E. sericea subsp. sericea
6b Plant more robust with thinner indumentum, pappus scales
forming a corona on cypsela .... 6b. E. sericea subsp. robustior
6a. subsp. sericea
Much-branched, dwarf shrub, 0.2-1. 3 m high; outer
branches sometimes decumbent, nude below, rough
with leaf scars, grey (because of its thick indumentum)
silky-woolly, glabrescent, twigs closely leafy. Leaves
opposite, grey silky-woolly, hairs fluffed up from leaf
surface, primary leaves linear or digitately 3-lobed, ± 8
x 1.5 mm, appearing fascicled from closely leafy, dwarf
axillary shoots. Capitula solitary, shortly pedunculate,
radiate. Involucre campanulate, ± 7 x 10 mm when
pressed, villous. Involucral bracts : 3 rows, imbricate;
outer 3x1.5 mm, ovate; middle 4x1.5 mm; inner 6.5 x
1.5 mm, obtuse with scarious and lacerate tips. Recepta-
cle paleate; paleae membranous, narrowly lanceolate, ±
5 x 0.5 mm. Ray florets female, 3-toothed usually white,
but sometimes rose-pink, or white flushed with pink;
corolla glandular; corolla limb 10.5 mm long; corolla
tube up to 1.8 mm long. Style 3 mm long, branched,
style branches 0.3 mm long with stigmatic areas along
edges. Ovary 2.2 mm long, slightly striate. Disc florets
bisexual, glandular, 5-lobed, yellow; lobes ovate, 0.1
mm long; corolla limb 2 mm long; corolla tube 1 mm
long. Anthers minutely caudate, apical appendages elon-
gated, obtuse; filaments thickened. Style up to 2.5 mm
long, branched, style branches 0.18 mm long with stig-
matic areas along edges. Ovary 2.2 mm long, slightly
striate. Cypsela narrowly cylindric, ± 2.5 mm long,
closely ribbed, glabrous but minutely papillose espe-
cially on ribs, crowned with thickened apical rim. Pap-
pus absent. Flowering time : Nov.-Apr.
Distribution and habitat'. Eumorphia sericea subsp.
sericea occurs in Free State, KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho
and Eastern Cape Province, at 2 296-3 414 m (Figure
4). E. sericea subsp. sericea grows in seasonally wet
areas.
Note', although close to E. prostrata , it has paleate
receptacles.
Specimens examined
FREE STATE. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Mont-aux-Sources, summit
above chain ladder, (-DB), 14 Jan. 1982, Roux 1083 (PRE).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): top of Sani Pass, (-CB),
23 Mar. 1962, Acocks 22159 (PRE).
LESOTHO. — 2928 (Marakabeis): Tsienyane Valley, over Menia-
meng Pass, (-AA), 8 Jan. 1955, Coetzee 484 (PRE). 2929 (Under-
berg); Castle Buttress, on summit of Drakensberg, (-AA), 18 Dec.
1952, Killick 1873 (PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): Barkly East, Drakensberg,
Doodman’s Krans Mtn, (-CA), 7 Mar. 1904, Galpin 6699 (PRE).
6b. subsp. robustior Hilliard & B.L.Burtt in Notes
from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 40: 248
(1982). Type: Eastern Cape, 3127 (Lady Frere): Elliot,
Fetcani Pass, common bush up to 5' [1.64 m], on slopes
and especially in rock-fall scrub, (-BB), 7500' [2 460
m], 22 Jan. 1979, O.M. Hilliard & B.L. Burtt 12331
(NU, holo.; E, PRE!, K, M, S, NBG, iso.).
Green bush because of its thinner indumentum on
leaves, more robust, hence its name, pappus scales form-
ing a corona on cypsela. Flowering time : Dec-May.
Distribution and habitat'. Eumorphia sericea subsp.
robustior is found in Naudesnek down to Spitskop Farm,
at 2 073-2 755 m (Figure 4). This subspecies grows in
damp areas.
Specimens examined
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): Barkly East, Rhodes to
Naudesnek, at foot of cliff, (-DD), 22 Feb. 1971, Hilliard & Burtt
6732 (PRE); Rhodes, roadside between Ugie and Barkly East, (-DD).
10 May 1985, Hutchings 1706 (PRE). 3028 (Matatiele): Barkly East,
Naudesnek, (-CA), 28 Nov. 1971, Hilliard 5213 (PRE); Naudesnek,
between Maclear and Rhodes, (-CC), 7 Dec. 1983, Van Wvk 6713
(PRE). 3127 (Lady Frere): Elliot, bastervoetpad, rocky ground on hill-
side and along stream, (-BB), 15 Feb. 1983, Hilliard & Burtt 16657
(PRE).
28 30 32
FIGURE 4. — Known distribution of Eumorphia sericea subsp. sericea ,
3; and subsp. robustior , •.
282
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Microscopy Unit of the University of Pretoria is
thanked for the use of their Scanning Electron Micro-
scope, and my fellow SANBI colleagues, namely P.
Herman for guidance and discussions, Gillian Condy
for kindly preparing the line drawing, Elizma Fouche
for her assistance with SEM plates and Hester Steyn for
producing the distribution maps.
REFERENCES
BOLUS, H. 1906, Contributions to the African flora. Transactions of the
South African Philosophical Society 16: 387, 388.
BREMER, K. 1994. Asteraceae: cladistics and classification. Timber
Press, Portland, Oregon.
BREMER, K. & HUMPHRIES, C. 1993. Generic monograph of the
Asteraceae-Anthemideae. Bulletin of the Natural History > Muse-
um. Botany Series 23: 71-177.
CANDOLLE, A.P. DE. 1838. Compositae. Prodromus 6. Treuttel &
Wiirtz, Paris.
COMPTON, R.H. 1967. Plantae novae africanae. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 33: 293-304.
GRIERSON, A.J.C. 1972. Eumorphia sericea. Curtis's Botanical Mag-
azine 178, new series: t. 608.
HARVEY, W.H. 1865. Compositae. Flora capensis 3: 44-530.
HERMAN, P.P.J., RETIEF, E„ KOEKEMOER, M. & WELMAN, W.G.
2000. Asteraceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Afri-
ca: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 101-170. National Botani-
cal Institute, Pretoria.
HERMAN, P.P.J., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ KOEKEMOER,
M. & NETNOU, N. 2003. Asteraceae. In G. Germishuizen &
N. L. Meyer, Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist.
Strelitzia 14: 217. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1977. Compositae in Natal. University of Natal
Press, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1982. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: IX. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 40: 248, 249.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT. L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part I: the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
JACKSON, W.P.U. 1 990. Origins and meanings of names of South Afri-
can plant genera. Pteridophytes, gymnosperms and monocoty-
ledonous angiosperms. University of Cape Town, South Africa.
KALLERSJO, M. 1985. Fruit structure and generic delimination of
Athanasia (Asteraceae-Anthemideae) and related South African
genera. Nordic Journal of Botany 5: 527-542.
OBERPRIELER, C., HIMMELREICH, S., KALLERSJO, M., VAL-
LES, J., WATSON, L.E. & VOGT, R. 2009. Anthemideae. In
V.A. Funk., A. Susanna, T.F. Stuessy. & R.J. Bayer, Systematics,
evolution and biogeography of Compositae. International Asso-
ciation for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna, Austria.
OBERPRIELER, C„ VOGT, R. & WATSON, L.E. 2007. XVI. Tribe
Anthemideae Cass. In K. Kubitzki, The families and genera of
vascular plants. VIII. Flowering plants — eudicots, Asterales (eds
J.W. Kadereit & C. Jeffrey): 342-374. Springer, Berlin.
OLIVER, I.B. 1989. Eumorphia prostrata H.Bol. An indigenous ground
cover with horticultural potential. Veld & Flora 75: 40.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1950. Descriptions and changes of name. Journal of
South African Botany 16: 20.
RAIMONDO, D., VON STADEN, L„ FODEN, W„ VICTOR, J.E.,
HELME, N.A., TURNER, R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MAN-
YAM A, P.A. (eds). 2009. Red List of South African plants 2009.
Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pre-
toria.
RETIEF, E. & HERMAN, P.P..I. 1997. Plants of the northern provinces
of South Africa: keys and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6.
National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
SMITH, G.F. & WILLIS, C.K. 1 999. Index herbariorum: southern Afri-
can supplement, edn 2: 128. Southern African Botanical Diver-
sity Network Report No. 8. SABONET, Pretoria.
STAFLEU, A.S. & RICHARD, S.C. 1976. Taxonomic literature. A
selective guide to botanical publications and collections with
dates, commentaries and types, vol. 1 : A-G, edn 2. Bohn, Schel-
tema & Holkema, Utrecht.
WOOD, J.M. & EVANS, M.S. 1897. New Natal fiants. Journal of Bot-
any 35: 488. West, Newman, London.
WEBSITE: Aluka digital library, http://plants.jstor.org (accessed June
2011).
Bothalia 41,2: 283-288 (2011)
Review of the genus Xenoscapa (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), including X,
grandiflora , a new species from southern Namibia
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
Keywords: Iridaceae, new species, southern Africa, taxonomy, Xenoscapa (Goldblatt) Goldblatt & J.C. Manning
ABSTRACT
The small genus Xenoscapa (Goldblatt) Goldblatt & J.C.Manning, endemic to the southern African winter rainfall region,
is reviewed. The new species X. grandiflora is described from the deeply dissected southern part of the Huib Hoch Plateau
in southern Namibia. It differs from the two known species in the genus in its significantly larger, pale lilac flowers. Full
descriptions and accounts of all three known species are provided, with distribution maps and illustrations.
INTRODUCTION
Xenoscapa (Goldblatt) Goldblatt & J.C.Manning, one of
the smallest genera in Iridaceae, currently comprises two
species from the winter rainfall region of southern Namibia
and southwestern South Africa. Both are small, deciduous
geophytes with two or three, soft-textured, prostrate foli-
age leaves and unusual, single-flowered, mostly shortly
branched spikes (Goldblatt & Manning 1995, 2008). The
vegetative similarity between them extends to the flowers,
which are long-tubed with relatively small, narrow tepals
and shortly exserted. arcuate stamens.
The distinctive combination of single-flowered spikes,
tubular flowers, and deeply divided style branches caused
a great deal of uncertainty about the taxonomic position
of the genus. The slender perianth tube and divided style
branches caused the first known species, Xenoscapa fis-
tulosa (Spreng. ex Klatt) Goldblatt & J.C.Manning, to be
described in the genus Ovieda Spreng. (an illegitimate later
synonym of Lapeirousia Pourr.), from which it was sub-
sequently transferred to Lapeirousia (Baker 1877). The
rounded conns with fibrous tunics are anomalous there,
however, and it was accordingly moved to Anomatheca
as the monotypic section Xenoscapa (Goldblatt 1972).
A later morphological cladistic analysis indicated that
the species was also misplaced here, combining a unique
mix of mainly apomorphic character states, notably the
unusual inflorescence, reduced leaf number and cylin-
drical capsules, containing plesiomorphic, angled seeds.
As a result, Xenoscapa was recognized as an independ-
ent genus, and increased to two species with the addition
of a new species from central Namaqualand, X. uliginosa
Goldblatt & J.C.Manning. The precise relationships of
Xenoscapa remained uncertain until recent analysis of
plastid sequence data placed it as sister to the clade com-
prising Devia-Crocosmia-Freesia (Goldblatt et al. 2006).
The four genera are currently treated as the tribe Freesieae
(Goldblatt & Manning 2008).
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town / Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2011-02-01.
The two known species of Xenoscapa are distin-
guished by small differences in perianth size and colour,
height of the flowering stems in fruit, and the presence
or absence of floral fragrance (Table 1 ). X. fistulosa is
relatively widespread, occurring throughout the range
of the genus, from the Huib Hoch Plateau in southern
Nambia southwards along the Namaqualand escarpment
and the interior mountains of the southwestern Cape,
with two outlying populations along the West Coast
(Goldblatt & Manning 2000a). X. uliginosa , in contrast,
is a highly local endemic restricted to middle and upper
elevations of the Kamiesberg, where it may co-occur
with X. fistulosa (Goldblatt & Manning 1995). A recent
collection from the summit of Hohenzollem Peak in
the Hunsberge in southern Namibia, slightly east of the
recorded range of X. fistulosa , is distinctive in its sig-
nificantly larger, pale lilac flowers with relatively larger
anthers, and represents a third species, described here
as X. grandiflora. We take this opportunity to provide a
review of the genus Xenoscapa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study is based on an examination of living plants
in the field and of specimens in the following herbaria:
BOL, MO, NBG, PRE and SAM (acronyms according
TABLE 1. — Distinguishing morphological characters mXenoscapa
284
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
to Holmgren et al. 1990). The abbreviation of author
names follows Brummitt & Powell (1992).
TAXONOMY
Xenoscapa (Goldblatt) Goldblatt & J.C. Manning
in Systematic Botany 20: 172 (1995). Anomatheca sect.
Xenoscapa Goldblatt: 88 (1972). Type species: X. fistu-
losa (Spreng. ex Klatt) Goldblatt & J.C. Manning.
Seasonal perennials with small, globose conn, rooting
from the base and axial in origin; tunics of finely retic-
ulate fibres. Cataphylls 2 or 3, pale and membranous.
Leaves 2 or 3, unifacial, prostrate, soft-textured, with
definite midrib; margins with columnar epidermal cells.
Stem short or long, erect, terete, often with 1-3 short
branches. Inflorescence of solitary, sessile flowers termi-
nal on axes; bracts green, leathery, inner bracts slightly
shorter or more often slightly longer than outer, often
notched apically. Flowers zygomorphic, tubular or sal-
ver-shaped, either cream-coloured and sweetly scented
or pink with contrasting markings on lower tepals and
unscented, with nectar from septal nectaries; perianth
tube cylindric and elongate; tepals subequal, spreading
or dorsal erect, slightly larger, and spoon-shaped. Sta-
mens unilateral and arcuate, filaments shortly exserted.
Ovary globose, sessile; style filiform, with short, deeply
divided, recurved branches. Capsules oblong to cylin-
dric, cartilaginous. Seeds strongly angled, with promi-
nent chalazal crest, slightly wrinkled, matte, surface
colliculate-rugulose. Basic chromosome number x =11.
Three species, in the southern African winter rainfall
zone of southern Namibia and western South Africa.
Etymology, from the Greek, xenos, for strange and
scapa, for flowering stem, because of the inflorescence,
unusual for subfamily Crocoideae in bearing solitary
flowers on the main and lateral branches instead of
spikes of multiple flowers.
Key to species
la Flowers white or cream-coloured (rarely very pale pink),
without contrasting nectar guides but perianth tube often
flushed purple, fragrant; perianth tube 1.0-1 .5 mm diam.
at mouth; tepals 4—7 x 1-3 mm; anthers 1.0-2. 5 mm long;
capsules (8—) 1 2-1 8 mm long 3 .X.fistutosa
lb Flowers lilac to dark pink or purple with contrasting nectar
guides on lower tepals, unscented; perianth tube 1. 5-2.0
mm diam. at mouth; tepals 6-14 x 2. 0-5. 5 mm; anthers
2—4 mm long; capsules 10-13 mm long:
2a Flowers dark pink; perianth tube 22-28 mm long; tepals
6-7 x 2-3 mm; anthers ± 2 mm long; plants from
Kamiesberg in central Namaqualand 2. X. uliginosa
2b Flowers pale lilac; perianth tube 33-35 mm long; tepals
12-14 x 4. 0-5. 5 mm; anthers 3.5— 4.0 mm long; plants
from Hunsberge in southern Namibia \.X. grcmdiflora
1 . Xenoscapa grandiflora Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
sp. nov.
Ilaec species quoad folia prostrata oblonga et capsu-
las oblongo-cylindricas Xenoscapae fistulosae etX. ulig-
inosae similis, sed ab eis floribus pallide lilacinis ino-
doris, tepalis iuferioribus dilute malvino-suffusis, tubo
perianthii 33-35 mm longo, et tepalis 12-14 x 4. 0-5. 5
mm differt.
TYPE. — Namibia, 2717 (Chamaites): Hunsberge, Ho-
henzollem Peak, (-CC), 1 July 2007 [fi. in cult. 13 July
2010], E. van Jaarsveld sub J.C. Manning 3303 (NBG,
holo.; MO, iso.).
Deciduous geophyte, 40-100 mm high, including
flowers. Corm subglobose, 6-8 mm diam.; tunics of
coarse, netted fibres. Leaves 3, basal, prostrate, oblong,
lower two largest, 45-60 x 1 5-20 mm, upper leaf ± half
as large. Stem terete, inclined at base but then stiffly
erect, up to 45 mm long, with up to 3 short branches
10-15 mm long, each subtended by a short cauline bract.
Inflorescence of solitary flowers on main and lateral
axes; bracts green, 8-9 mm long, inner slightly longer
than outer and often shortly forked apically. Flow-
ers zygomorphic with angle widest between upper and
lower lateral tepals, tinged pale lilac, darker on tube,
lower 3 tepals each with pale creamy yellow patch at
base outlined in purple, unscented; perianth tube erect,
cylindric, 33-35 mm long, wider and curved just below
apex, 2 mm diam. at mouth; tepals subequal but inner
slightly wider than outer, 12-14 x 4. 0-5. 5 mm, weakly
cucullate apically, dorsal erect, others spreading hori-
zontally at right angles to tube. Stamens : filaments 3-5
mm long, exserted 2-4 mm from tube; anthers 3. 5-4.0
mm long, dark purple; pollen grey-blue. Ovary ellip-
soid; style branching opposite anther bases, branches 4
mm long, deeply forked and apically recurved. Capsule
oblong-cylindric, 10-13 * 3^1 mm. Seeds ± 1 mm diam.
Flowering time\ June-July. Figure 1A-D.
Distribution and ecology r. known only from the type
collection, made on the summit of Hohenzollern Peak at
the southern end of the Hunsberge in southern Namibia
(Figure 2) on 1 July 2007 by horticulturist Ernst van
Jaarsveld. The plants were tightly wedged in crevices in
the shelter of rock outcrops immediately below the east-
ern edge of the summit plateau, and were just past flow-
ering. Corms that were collected then have subsequently
flowered in cultivation. Vegetatively, these plants match
photographs of wild plants taken at the time and there
is no reason to expect that the dimensions derived from
the cultivated specimens will differ in any meaning-
ful way from specimens in the wild. The Hunsberge,
in the deeply dissected southern part of the Huib Hoch
Plateau, are a recognized site of ecological importance
in Namibia, known for a high level of endemism among
vertebrates (Barnard et al. 1998).
Diagnosis and relationships'. Xenoscapa grandiflora
is distinguished by its large, unscented, pale lilac flow-
ers marked with purple chevrons on the lower tepals,
a perianth tube 33-35 mm long and the tepals 12-14 x
4. 0-5. 5 mm.
Xenoscapa grandiflora is most likely to be confused
with X. uliginosa from the Kamiesberg, both of which
have relatively larger, unscented, generally pink flowers
with darker chevrons on the lower tepals but the latter
has bright pink or purple flowers with a shorter perianth
tube, 22-28 mm long, and smaller tepals, 6-7 mm long,
with the dorsal tepal typically suberect or spreading to
expose the stamens and style rather than remaining erect
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
285
FIGURE 1 . — Xenoscapa species: A-D,
X. grandiflora. Van Jaarsveld
sub Manning 3303 : A, flower-
ing plant; B, flower, front and
side views; C, capsules; D,
seed. E, F, X. uliginosa, Gold-
blatt & Manning 9244: E, flow-
ering plant; F, capsule. G, H, X.
fistulosa, Goldblatt & Manning
9374: G, flower and capsule; H,
capsule. Scale bar: 10 mm. Art-
ist: John Manning.
after anthesis (Figure IE). The common and widespread
X. fistulosa has smaller flowers with uniformly white or
cream-coloured (rarely pale pink) tepals (although the
tube is usually flushed maroon) and a distinct and notice-
able floral fragrance (described as sweetly clove-like).
Both Xenoscapa fistulosa and X. grandiflora are
self-fertile and autogamous, with all flowers setting full
capsules of seed that appear well formed (reproductive
biology is unknown in X. uliginosa). The unscented,
lilac flowers with elongate perianth tube and dark pur-
ple markings on the lower tepals of X. grandiflora are
consistent with pollination by long-proboscid flies, the
pollination system inX. uliginosa (Manning & Goldblatt
1996; Goldblatt & Manning 2000b).
2. Xenoscapa uliginosa Goldblatt & J.C. Manning
in Systematic Botany 20: 173 (1995). Type: South
Africa, [Northern Cape], Namaqualand, Farm Modder-
fontein. lower east-facing slopes of Sneeukop, ± 1 400
m, 18 Sept. 1981, Goldblatt [& Manning \ 9244 (NBG,
holo.!;K!,MO!,PRE!,iso.).
Deciduous geophyte, 30-50 mm high, including flow-
ers. Conn subglobose, 5-8 mm diam.; tunics of fine, net-
ted fibres. Leaves 3, basal, prostrate, oblong, lower two
largest, 20 — 40 x 5-18 mm, upper leaf ± half as large.
Stem terete, inclined at base but then stiffly erect, up
to 40 mm long, with up to 3 short branches 5-10 mm
long, each subtended by a short cauline bract. Inflores-
cence of solitary flowers on main and lateral axes; bracts
286
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
16° 18° 20° 22° 24° 26° 28°.
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of Xenoscapafistulosa, •; X. grandi-
flora , A;X. uliginosa, O.
green, 6-7 mm long, inner slightly longer than outer
and often shortly forked apically. Flowers zygomorphic,
dark pink or purple, darker on tube, lower 3 tepals each
with pale creamy yellow patch at base outlined in pur-
ple, unscented; perianth tube erect, cylindric, (20— )22 —
28 mm long, wider and curved just below apex, 1. 5-2.0
mm diam. at mouth; tepals subequal but inner slightly
wider than outer, 6-7 x 2-3 mm, weakly cucullate api-
cally, dorsal erect or suberect and exposing anthers. Sta-
mens'. filaments 3-5 mm long, exserted ± 2 mm from
tube; anthers ± 2 mm long, dark purple; pollen grey-
blue. Ovary ellipsoid; style branching opposite anther
bases, branches 2 mm long, deeply forked and apically
recurved. Capsule oblong, ± 10 x 3—4 mm. Seeds ± 1
mm diam. Flowering time : mid Sept.-Oct., rarely into
early Nov. Figure IE, F.
Distribution and ecology: restricted to the Kamies-
berg in central Namaqualand, and known originally only
from the Sneeuberg but recently collected in the Lang-
kloof east of Stalberg, at the foot of Rooiberg (Figure 2).
Xenoscapa uliginosa has a specialized habit along the
margins of seasonal seeps and in rock flushes. During
the growing season the roots are constantly irrigated by
water percolating through the mossy sward in which the
conns are anchored.
The long-tubed, bright pink flowers are pollinated by
the long proboscid fly Prosoeca peringueyi (Nemestrini-
dae) (Manning & Goldblatt 1996).
Diagnosis and relationships: Xenoscapa uliginosa is
recognized by its moderately large, dark pink or purple,
unscented flowers marked with purple chevrons on the
lower tepals, perianth tube 22-28 mm long, and tepals
6-7 x 2-3 mm. Plants from the Sneeuberg have the
dorsal tepal ± suberect to expose the anthers and style
but a recent collection from the Langkoof on the south-
ern flank of the Rooiberg massif (Goldblatt & Porter
13575), representing the second known station for the
species, has the dorsal tepal erect over the stamens and
style, and the length of the perianth tube at the lower end
of the range recorded for the species. In other respects,
however, including the short, oblong capsides, the Rooi-
berg plants match those from the type locality and there
is at present no reason to suspect that they are not con-
specific.
The species might be confused with Xenoscapa gran-
diflora from southern Namibia but that species has larger,
pale lilac flowers with a much longer perianth tube,
33-35 mm long, and the dorsal tepal 12-14 mm long.
Flowering in X. uliginosa is also generally later, in Sep-
tember and October (rarely into November) rather than in
mid-winter.
Additional material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Modderfonteins-
berg, (-BB), 4 Nov. 1830, Drege 2635 (P); Sneeukop, above Modder-
fontein Farm, (-BB), 15 Sept. 1990, Rourke & Nelson 1936 (NBG);
Sneeukop, Bovlei Farm, (-BB), 28 Sept. 1991, Bean & Trinder-Smith
2634 (BOL). 3018 (Kamiesberg): Langkloof, Farm Naartjiesdam, (-
AC), 23 Sept. 2010, Goldblatt & Porter 13575 (NBG, MO).
3. Xenoscapa fistulosa (Spreng. exKlatt) Goldblatt
& J.C. Manning in Systematic Botany 20: 172 (1995).
Ovieda fistulosa Spreng. ex Klatt: 781 (1863). Lapei-
rousia fistulosa (Spreng. ex Klatt) Baker: 155 (1877).
Anomatheca fistulosa (Spreng. ex Klatt) Goldblatt: 88
(1972). Type: South Africa, [Western Cape], Olifants
River, Clanwilliam, without date, Ecklon & Zevher Irid.
254 (B, holo.!; MO!, PRE!, iso.).
Deciduous geophyte, (50-)70-200 mm high, includ-
ing flowers. Conn subglobose, 5-8 mm diam.; tunics
of fine to medium-textured, netted fibres. Leaves 3,
basal, prostrate, oblong, lower two largest, 20-50(-
70) x 5—1 8(— 20) mm, upper leaf ± half as large. Stem
terete, inclined at base but then stiffly erect, up to 180
mm long, with up to 4 short or longer branches 5-30
mm long, each subtended by a short cauline bract.
Inflorescence of solitary flowers on main and lateral
axes, sometimes a second inflorescence developing
in axil of upper leaf; bracts green, 5-7 mm long, inner
slightly longer than outer and often shortly forked api-
cally. Flowers zygomorphic, white or cream-coloured,
rarely pale pink, flushed purplish on tube, unmarked,
with sweet-spicy fragrance; perianth tube erect, cylin-
dric, 1 8— 25(— 33 ) mm long, wider and curved just below
apex, 1.0-1. 5 mm diam. at mouth; tepals subequal, 4-7
x 1-3 mm, weakly cucullate apically, dorsal erect but
others spreading ± horizontally at right angles to tube.
Stamens: filaments 3-5 mm long, exserted ± 2 mm from
tube; anthers 1.0-2. 5 mm long, dark purple; pollen grey-
blue. Ovary ellipsoid; style branching between base and
middle of anthers, branches 2 mm long, deeply forked
and apically recurved. Capsule oblong to cylindric,
( 8—) 1 2—20 x 2. 5-4.0 mm. Seeds ± 1 mm diam. Flower-
ing time: mainly Aug.-Sept., rarely in late July. Figure
IG, H.
Distribution and ecology: widely distributed along
the near interior of the southern African Atlantic coast
and the western Karoo, Xenoscapa fistulosa extends
from Aurusberg and the southern edge of the Huib Hoch
Plateau in southern Namibia through the higher-lying
parts of the Richtersveld and Namaqualand into West-
ern Cape, where it occurs in the northern Cedarberg and
inland onto the Roggeveld Escarpment, thence south-
wards into the Worcester Valley as far east as Montagu
and thence to Faingsburg and the northern foothills of
the Klein Swartberg, with two isolated stations along
the coast, one at Vredenburg and the other on the lower
slopes of Fion’s Head on the Cape Peninsula (Figure 2).
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
287
The species is mostly restricted to shale or gneiss/gran-
ite substrates, rarely on other rock types in the Rich-
tersveld and southern Namibia, from near sea level to
almost 1 300 m. It does not occur on sandstone-derived
soils of the Cape System and is thus virtually absent
from the southwestern Cape mountain systems — the two
coastal stations in the southwestern Cape are on granite
outcrops.
Plants are invariably restricted to cool, seasonally
moist or wet and largely shaded situations in the lee
of rocks or boulders, with the corms often anchored in
moss pads. The flowering season is substantially length-
ened in years of favourable rainfall by the development
of a secondary inflorescence from the upper leaf axil.
This has not been observed in the other two species.
The pale, mostly white or cream-coloured flowers
of Xenoscapa fistulosa with their sweet-spicy fragrance
suggest that the species is adapted to moth pollination.
It co-occurs with long-proboscid fly-pollinated X. uligi-
nosa in the Kamiesberg ( Bean & Trinder-Smith 2642 &
2634 respectively), and hybrids between the two (Gold-
blatt 9244 A MO) are known (Goldblatt & Manning
1995).
Diagnosis and relationhips : Xenoscapa fistulosa is
recognized by relatively long-tubed, white or cream-
coloured (rarely pale pink) flowers with a strong sweet-
spicy fragrance. The slender perianth tube is mostly
1 8-25 mm long, exceptionally 30-33 mm long in plants
from Pakhuis Pass and the northern Cedarberg (Leipoldt
s.n., Goldblatt 544), and only 1.0-1. 5 mm in diameter at
the mouth. The tepals are mostly smaller and narrower,
4 — 6(— 7) x 1-3 mm. than in pink-flowered X. grandiflora
and X. uliginosa (Table 1 ). Most collectors remark on
the strong floral fragrance, which immediately distin-
guishes the species from its unscented congeners.
Although the species is typically white-flowered,
populations from the Richtersveld and southern Namibia
often have pale pink flowers [see Williamson (2000): 127
Xenoscapa fastuosa (sic.) for illustration]. The smallest-
flowered species in the genus, X. fistulosa may grow
much taller than the other species, the stem reaching
up to 180 mm long, with the lateral branches up to 30
mm long. The capsules are similarly often significantly
longer, up to 18 mm long and strongly cylindric. The two
outlying coastal populations, from Witteklip at Vreden-
burg and Lion’s Head on the Cape Peninsula, although
well separated geographically from the main range of
the species, do not evidently differ morphologically from
inland populations.
Additional material examined
NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witputz): Karas, Aurusberge, saddle overlook-
ing Roter Kamm, (-CB), 28 Sept. 1996, Marmheimer & Burke 393
(WIND); Rosh Pinah. Spitskop, (-DC), 25 Sept. 1981, Muller & Horn
1599 [sic] (WIND); 9 Aug. 2000, Bruy ns 8314 (NBG); Rosh Pinah,
Sonberg, (-DD), 3 Sept. 2000, Bruyns 8855 (NBG); Witputz, Zebra-
fontein, (-DD), 22 Sept. 1981, Miiller & Horn 1599 [sic] (PRE). 2816
(Oranjemund): Diamond Area No. 1, Obib Mtn Peak, (-BA), 3 Sept.
1989, Van Wyk 9028 (PRE).
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Langermanskop, (-AA),
29 July 1993, Van Jaarsveld & Bezuidenhout 13430 (NBG); Rosyn-
tjiesberg, neck north of Lelieshoek, (-AC), 30 Aug. 1977, Oliver,
Tolken & Venter 294 (PRE); Stinkfontein Mtns, Comellsberg, (-CA),
6 Sept. 1977, Oliver, Tolken & Venter 710 (PRE); summit of Ploeg-
berg complex, (-C'D), 5 Aug. 1979, Van Berkel 104 (NBG). 2917
(Springbok): Steinkopf, (-AA), Aug. 1925, Marloth 6769 (NBG,
PRE); Spektakelberg, Farm Naries, (-AA), 26 Aug. 1983, Van Wyk
6452 (PRE); Bulletrap-Nigramoep road, 1 km east of Doringrivier,
(-BC), 26 Aug. 1981, Van Berkel 426 (NBG); Springbok, NE of
Platjiesfontein Farm, (-DA), Sept. 1995, G & F Williamson 5703
(NBG); Concordia, (-DB), Sept. 1883, Bolus 695 (BOL, SAM). 3017
(Hondeklipbaai): Sneeukop, Bovlei Farm, (-BB), 28 Sept. 1991, Bean
& Trinder-Smith 2642 (BOL); 16 miles [25.6 km] SW of Garies, (-
DB), without date, Hal! 3763 (NBG). 3018 (Kamiesberg): granite
dome NE of Farm Outuin, (-AA), 21 Aug. 2001, Goldblatt & Porter
11734 (MO, NBG); Studer’s Pass, (-AC), 19 Aug. 1986, Bean 1717
(BOL); Grasberg, (-CB), 22 Aug. 1999, Desmet 166 (NBG); Klip-
poort-se-Berg, (-CB), 21 Aug. 1999, Desmet 140 (NBG); Langberg,
W of Loeriesfontein, (-DB), 5 Sept. 2006, Goldblatt & Porter 12766
(MO, NBG). 3119 (Calvinia): Menzieskraal Farm, (-AC), Sept. 1899,
Leipoldt 825 (SAM); lower slopes of Hantam Mtns, Akkerendam, (—
BD), 22 Jul. 1961, Lewis 5807 (NBG); Menzieskraal Farm, (-CB), 22
Aug. 1986, Snijman 1077 (NBG); Keiskie-se-poort, (-DB), 17 Sept.
2008, Goldblatt & Porter 13134 (MO, NBG). 3220 (Sutherland):
Tankwa Karoo National Park, Farm Klipfontein, (-AA), 14 Sept.
2007, Sachse 554 (PRE); Tankwa Karoo National Park, Farm Klein-
fontein, (-AA), 6 Aug. 2006, Klopper 335 (PRE); Agterkop Farm, (—
AA), 5 Aug. 2006, Steyn 901 (PRE); Soekop Farm, Bohoek, (-AA),
8 Aug. 2006, Rosclt 462 (NBG); Tankwa Karoo National Park, near
Paulshoek, (-AC), 27 Aug. 2004, Steyn 589 (PRE); Kuduberg, Muis-
hondhoogte, (-CA), Sept. 1921, Marloth 10382 (PRE); Houthoek, (—
CA), 15 Aug. 1968, Hanekom 1092 (PRE); Verlatekloof Pass, (-DA),
25 Aug. 2004, Steyn 553 (PRE).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 ( Vanrhynsdorp); Mauwerskop, (-DB),
20 Aug. 1986. Snijman 1058 (NBG). 3217 (Vredenburg): Witte-
klip, near Vredenburg, (-DD), 1 Sept. 1944, Lewis 890 (SAM). 3218
(Clanwilliam): Olifants River, (-BB), 25 Aug. 1894, Schlechter 5024
(BOL); east bank of lower Clanwilliam Dam. (-BB), 8 Sept. 1976,
Thompson 2819 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Clanwilliam, Alpha Farm,
(-AA), 20 July 1941, Bond 1054 (NBG); Pakhuis Pass, (-AA), 3 Sept.
1933, Leipoldt s.n. BOL45054 (BOL); near top of Bidouw Pass, (-
AA), 14 Sept, [without year], Goldblatt 544 (BOL). 3220 (Sutherland):
Farm Thyskraal, (-CC), 7 Sept. 1986, Cloete & Haselau 292 (NBG).
3318 (Cape Town): Lion’s Head. (-CD), Aug. 1924, Rennie & Giffen
s.n. SAM27416 (SAM); slopes of Lion’s Head, (-CD), Aug. 1940,
Lewis 4293 (SAM). 3319 (Worcester): Karoopoort, (-BA), 18 Sept.
1938, Hafstrom & Acocks 315 (PRE); 16 Sept. 1971, Thompson 1261
(NBG); Hex River Pass, near top, (-BD), 2 Sept. 1992, Goldblatt &
Manning 9374 (PRE); Worcester. Karoo Garden, (-CB), 28 July 1975,
Dobay 21 (NBG); 13 Aug. 1970, Bayer 2 (NBG); Stettyn area. Farm
Kleindoom, (-CD), 1971 [without precise date], Oliver 3280 (NBG,
PRE); N end of Farm Alfalfa, near Moordkuil, (-DA), 26 Sept. 1983,
Goldblatt & Snijman 6971A (MO, NBG). 3320 (Montagu): Whitehill
Ridge, (-BA), 17 Aug. 1942, Compton 13377 (NBG); Oudeberg, NE
of Montagu, (-CB), 27 July 1959, Acocks 20533 (PRE); 8 km SE of
Montagu, Farm Amanzi, (-CD), 15 Aug. 1993, Manning 2028 (NBG);
S foothills of Voetpadsberg, Farm Doringkloof, (-DB), 23 Aug. 1985,
Van der Kooy 30 (NBG). 3321 (Ladismith): Kleinswartberg foothills,
road to Seweweekspoort. Farm Modderfontein, (-AC), 21 Sept. 2003,
Goldblatt & Porter 12327 (MO, NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Ernst van Jaarsveld, horticulturist
at Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens, for bring-
ing Xenoscapa grandiflora to our attention; the curators
of BOL, MO and PRE for providing access to their col-
lections; and to Colleen Mannheimer for providing addi-
tional records from southern Namibia.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1877 [‘1878’]. Systema iridearum. Journal of the Lin-
nean Society, Botany 16: 61-180.
BARNARD, P„ BETHUNE, S. & KOLBERG, H. 1998. Biodiversity
of terrestrial and freshwater habitats. In P. Barnard, Biologi-
cal diversity in Namibia: a country study: 57-187. Namibian
National Biodiversity Taskforce, Windhoek.
288
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. 1992. Authors of plant names.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1972. Revision of Lapeirousia and Anomatheca in the
winter rainfall area of southern Africa. Contributions from the
Bolus Herbarium 4: 1—111.
GOLDBLATT. P. DAVIES. T.J., MANNING, J.C., VAN DER BANK,
M. & SAVOLAINEN, V. 2006. Phylogeny of Iridaceae subfami-
ly Crocoideae based on a combined multigene plastid analysis.
Aliso 22: 399-411.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1995. Phylogeny of the African
genera Anomatheca and Freesia (Iridaceae: Ixioideae), and a
new genus Xenoscapa. Systematic Botany 20: 161-178.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000a. Cape plants. A conspectus
of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical
Institute, Cape Town & Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000b. The long-proboscid fly
pollination system in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 87: 146-170.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2008. The iris family: natural
history and classification. Timber Press, Oregon.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part 1: the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
KLATT, F.W. 1863. Revisio iridearum. Linnaea 32: 689-784.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1996. The Prosoeca peringueyi
(Diptera: Nemestrinidae) pollination guild in southern Africa:
long-tongued flies and their tubular flowers. Annals of the Mis-
souri Botanical Garden 83: 67-86.
WILLIAMSON, G. 2000. Richtersveld. The enchanted wilderness.
Umdaus, Hatfield, Pretoria.
Bothalia 41,2: 289-326 (2011)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
NYCTAGINACEAE
NOTES ON COMM1CARPUS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, INCLUDING A NEW RECORD FOR NAMIBIA
Commicarpus Standi, is a genus in the Nyctaginaceae
with its main distribution range in Africa (Meikle 1978).
In southern Africa, nine species occur which are widely
distributed in the region, with its centre of diversity in
Namibia (Germishuizen & Meyer 2003). No formal
taxonomic research has specifically been conducted on
Commicarpus in southern Africa. Most of the existing
knowledge of the group is based on floras from else-
where in Africa (Baker & Wright 1909; Hutchinson &
Dalziel 1927; Meikle 1954; Stannard 1988; Whitehouse
1996).
Anthocarp morphology is considered to provide the
most differential characters of the family (Smith 1976;
Willson & Spellenberg 1977; Bohlin 1988; Douglas
& Manos 2007). An anthocarp consists of a fruit (an
achene or utricle) enclosed in a persistent, accrescent,
hard, leathery or fleshy base of the calyx tube (Bogle
1974). The anthocarp of the southern African Com-
micarpus species is 5-10 x 2-3 mm, cylindrical, fusi-
form. clavate or elliptic-clavate with ten obscure ribs
and large, dark, mucilaginous, wart-like glands scattered
over the surface. The apex is surrounded by ten glands
which are either stalked or sessile.
An investigation of the anthocarp morphology of the
southern African Commicarpus species has revealed
numerous misidentifications in southern African her-
baria. These misidentifications were probably based on
leaf morphology and growth form which do not vary
considerably between Commicarpus species. Finer mor-
phological differences of the anthocarps facilitate the
construction of a key to accurately differentiate between
the taxa below genus level.
Key to species
la Anthocarp cylindrical with sessile glands around apex
1 . C. chinensis subsp. natalensis
lb Anthocarp fusiform, clavate or elliptic-clavate with stalked
and sessile glands around apex:
2a Anthocarp elliptic-clavate 2 . C. pilosus
2b Anthocarp fusiform or clavate:
3a Anthocarp fusiform:
4a Ring of five stalked glands alternating with five sessile
glands around apex; anthocarp 4—6 mm long
3. C. squarrosus or 4. C. friiticosus
4b Ring of ten stalked glands around apex; anthocarp 7-9
mm long:
5a Surface of anthocarp below apex covered sparsely
with short-stalked glands (< 1 mm long) grouped
together 5. C. plumbagineus
5b Surface of anthocarp below apex covered with scat-
tered sessile glands 6 . C.fallacissimus
3b Anthocarp clavate:
6a Anthocarp broadly clavate; surface covered with pro-
minent glandular hairs; apex surrounded by ten
short-stalked glands (< 1 mm) 7. C. decipiens
6b Anthocarp clavate; surface glabrous to puberulent;
apex surrounded by five stalked glands alternating
with five sessile glands:
7a Apex surrounded by five thick-stalked glands, stalks
< 1 mm long 8. C. pentandrus
7b Apex surrounded by five thin-stalked glands, stalks
1-2 mm long 9. C. helenae var. helenae
The key has facilitated the re-identification of large-
fruited Commicarpus specimens collected from Namibia.
We have identified these specimens as Commicarpus
helenae (Roem. & Schult.) Meikle var. helenae , a vari-
ety with a wide distribution from the Middle East into
Africa, which also occurs on the islands of the Canar-
ies, Cape Verde and the type locality, St Helena (Meikle
1978). In the Flora of southern African ( FSA ) region, it
was hitherto only known from Botswana and the Lim-
popo Province of South Africa and was not considered
to occur in Namibia (Germishuizen & Meyer 2003). In
southern Africa, the taxon has been regarded as of lim-
ited occurrence, as the circumscription of Commicarpus
helenae var. helenae has generally been misunderstood.
Based on anthocarp structure, we can confirm that many
southern African specimens of C. helenae var. helenae
have been misidentified and erroneously placed under C.
fallacissimus (Heimerl) Heimerl ex Oberm., Schweick. &
I.Verd.. C. pentandrus (Burch.) Heimerl, C. pilosus (Hei-
merl) Meikle, C. plumbagineus (Cav.) Standi, var. plum-
bagineus and C. squarrosus (Heimerl) Standi. Especially
the misidentifications as C. fallacissimus, C. pilosus or C.
squarrosus can be ascribed to the semisucculent leaves
and growth form that these taxa share with C. helenae
but the anthocarps differ considerably in shape and gland
characters (Figure 1). As a result, the distribution patterns
of these taxa in the FSA region have also been misinter-
preted.
We can therefore confirm the presence of Commi-
carpus helenae var. helenae in Namibia based on the
anthocarp structure of the specimens being most simi-
lar to what is generally regarded as typical for the spe-
cies (Struwig et al. 2010). The anthocarp is clavate and
tapers markedly from the apex to the base with a ring
of five, long, stalked glands around the apex and two
rings of sessile glands below. However, a specimen from
Khowarib ( Struwig 44) in the Kaokoveld, differs from
other specimens in that the five stalked glands around
the apex are longer (2 mm) than those recorded for other
specimens from southern Africa (1 mm) (Figure 2). This
taxon is being investigated further.
290
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
FIGURE I . — Anthocarps of Commicarpus: A, C. helenae var. helenae', B, C.fal/acissimus ; C, C. pilosus: and D, C. squarrosus. Scale bars: 5 mm.
Photographs: S.J. Siebert.
Commicarpus helenae ( Roem . & Schult .) Meikle
in Hooker’s leones Plantarum 7, 4: t. 3694 (1971).
Boerhavia helenae Roem. & Schult.: 73 (1822). Type:
St Helena, Ladder Hill, Burchell l [K, neo., designated
by Whitehouse ( 1 996).-Aluka image, website accessed
08-02-2010],
Boerhavia slellala Wight: 6, t. 875 (1843) non B. stellata Bojer:
188 (1842) nom. i I legit. C. stellatus (Wight) Berhaut: 51 (1953). Type:
India.
[C. verlicillalus sensu Baker & Wright: 6 (1909); sensu Hutchinson
& Dalziel: 153 (1927); sensu Heimerl: 1 17 (1934); sensu Balle: 86 t. 7
(1951); sensu Meikle: I ( 1954); non Standi.: 101 (1916)].
Commicarpus helenae {Roem. & Schult.) Meikle
var. helenae
Herb, from a woody rootstock. Stems 1 .0-1.5 m long,
slender, erect, decumbent or scrambling, branching.
pubescent or glabrous. Leaves ovate, 15-50 * 10-40
mm, ± fleshy, pubescent to glabrous, apex rounded
to acute, apiculate, base cordate, rounded or more or
less truncate, slightly attenuate along petiole; margins
entire to somewhat repand; petioles 4-22 mm long,
sparsely pubescent. Inflorescence narrow, verticillate,
long-pedunculate, peduncles sparsely pubescent; bracts
linear-lanceolate, 1-2 mm long, pubescent. Flowers ses-
sile to very shortly pedicellate. Perianth 4.0-5.0(-6.5)
mm long, lower portion sulcate with 5 prominent vis-
cid glands around apex, upper portion 2. 0-3. 0(— 4.5)
mm long, widely infundibuliform with a short (1 mm)
inconspicuous tube, pubescent; sepals purple, mauve,
magenta, pink, white or yellow. Stamens 2 or 3; fila-
ments 4— 5(— 6) mm long; anthers transverse-elliptic to
rounded, 0.3-0. 5 mm long. Ovary ellipsoid, shortly
stipitate, 0. 5-0.6 mm long, glabrous; style 3.0— 3.5(—
5.5) mm long. Anthocarp clavate, tapering markedly
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
291
FIGURE 2. — Light microscope
micrographs of anthocarps
of Commicarpus helenae var.
helenae. A, specimen collect-
ed from Kruger National Park,
South Africa, Zambatis 1954;
B, specimen collected from
Khowarib, Namibia, Stniwig
44. Scale bars: 1 mm.
from apex to base, 3. 5-7.0 x 1.0-2. 5 mm, sessile viscid
glands in rings, 5 stalked viscid glands, 1-2 mm long,
alternating with 5 sessile glands around apex Figures
1A; 2 A, B.
Commicarpus helenae has two varieties based on char-
acters of a morphological and biogeographical nature.
Commicarpus helenae (Roem. & Schult.) Meikle var.
barbatus Meikle differs from the typical variety in having
remarkably hairy stems and leaves (Meikle 1979, 1983).
Its distribution is restricted to tropical Africa (Klopper et
al. 2006; African Plant Database 2010). In Africa, the typi-
cal variety occurs as far south as N’watinwambu in the
Kruger National Park, South Africa (Maurin & Van der
Bank OM348).
Distribution and habitat : previously only 1 1 localities
of Commicarpus helenae var. helenae were known for
southern Africa, but our redeterminations have increased
this figure to 25, suggesting that the taxon is much more
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Commicarpus helenae var. helenae in
southern Africa.
part of the southern African flora than was previously
thought (Figure 3). It has been recorded from similar
habitat types in Namibia and South Africa. Labels gen-
erally describe the habitat as rocky, in sandy, loamy or
alluvial soil in calcrete or sandstone areas.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 1713 (Swartbooisdrif): Omitengundi, 500 m north
of road junction, (-AB), 09-04-1998, Schulte 108530 (WIND). 1913
(Sesfontein): Khowarib Rest Camp, underneath Acacia and Mopani
trees, (-BD), 09-02-2009, Stniwig 44 (PUC, WIND). 1916 (Gobaub):
Etosha National Park, Charitsaubplain, near pan with Acacia reficiens ,
(-AA), 18-04-1973, Le Roux 520 (WIND, PRE). 2115 (Karibib):
Spitzkoppe, (-DC), 03-03-1985, Craven 2022 (WIND). 2216 (Otjim-
bingwe): Okomitundu Farm, underneath Acacia trees in front of gate
to house, (-AB), 12-04-2010, Stniwig 183 (PUC, WIND).
BOTSWANA. — 2022 (Lake Ngami): Lake Ngami, Mwaku Pan
near Sehitwa, slopes around Mwaku Pan, (-BD), 12-1969, Van der
Spuy 30 (PRE, UCBG); north of Ngwanalekau Hills, open areas (often
termitaria) in Terminalia prunioides woodland, (-DB), 14-03-1969,
Buerger 1149 (PRE, UCBG). 2122 (Kobe): ± 10 km past Kuke Vil-
lage on road to Maun, (-AB), 06-03-1996, Burgoyne & Snow 5283
(PRE, UCBG). 2123 (Pink Pan): central Kalahari, (-AA), 02-02-1991,
Barnard 586 (PRE, UCBG). 2125 (Lothlekane): Orapa, (-AD), 16-03-
1975, Kerfoot 7748 (PRE. UCBG).
LIMPOPO. — 2229 (Waterpoort): Breslau Game Farm, base of
koppie, (-AC), 05-05-2000, Straub s.n. (PUC); Breslau Game Farm.
(-AC), 30-05-2000, Straub 831 (PRE); Langjan Nature Reserve, (-
CC), 12-1974, Zwanziger 496 (PRE); Soutpan 193, thinly scattered
in outer circle of salt pan, (-CD), 19-11-1932, Obermeyei; Schweick-
erdt & Verdoorn 19 (PRE); Soutpan, west side of pan, (-CD), 21-01-
1931, Bremekamp & Schweickerdt 249 (PRE, PRU). 2230 (Messina):
Tshipiza work station (Greater Kuduland Safaris), (-CB), 06-12-1984,
Van Wyk 6887 (PRE, PRU). 2331 (Phalaborwa): 50 m west of Shing-
wedzi River, over cement drift on bank, (-AA), 11-03-2010, Stniwig
141 (KNP. PUC); 150 m west of cement drift over Shingwedzi River,
upstream of Red Rocks, (-AA), 14-01-1994, Zambatis 1954 (KNP,
PRE); Letaba River, western border Mhlangene, (-CA), 01-12-1992,
Van Rooyen & Bredenkamp 582 (PRU). 2431 (Acomhoek): Kingfish-
erspruit, Timbavati, (-AD), 21-12-1962, Biologiese Afdeling 4592
(KNP, PRE); Klaserie Nature Reserve, Farm Ross 55KU, (-AD),
16-12-1981, Zambatis 1306 (PRE); Timbavati Private Nature Reserve,
Hans Hoheisen Wildlife Reserve Station, Kempiana 90KU, (-AD),
18-12-1982, Zambatis 1526 (PRE); Kruger National Park, Acomhoek,
in grassland, (-BC), 03-1975, Gertenbach 5042 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2431 (Acomhoek): Kruger National Park,
Nkuhlu Partial Exclosure, Sabie River, (-DD), 08-12-2010, Van Coller.
292
Bothalia 4 1 ,2 (2011)
Siebert & Siebert, 4339 (PUC). 2531 (Komatipoort): N'watinwambu
firebreak about 1 km from SI 14 road, (-BA), 05-12-2005, Maurin &
Van der Bank OM348 (KNP).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ms Hester Steyn is thanked for the production of the
distribution map and the curators of the following her-
baria for providing access to study material: KNP, PRE,
PRU, PUC and WIND (acronyms according to Holmgren
et al. 1990). The North-West University and National
Research Foundation provided financial support.
REFERENCES
AFRICAN PLANT DATABASE. 2010. Version 3.3. Conservatoire
et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Geneve and South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, http://www.ville-ge.ch/
musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/ (accessed Aug. 2010).
BAKER, J.G. & WRIGHT, C.H. 1909. Order Nyctaginaea. In W.T.
Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of tropical Africa 6,1: 1-9. Reeve, Lon-
don.
BALLE, S. 1951. Nyctaginaceae. In W. Robyns, P. Staner, F. Demaret,
R. Germain, G. Gilbert, L. Hauman, M. Homes, F. Jurion, J. Leb-
run, M. Van den Abeele & R. Boutique, Flore du Congo Beige et
du Ruanda-Urundi. Spermatophytes 2: 86, t. 7. Institut National
pour l'Etude Agronomique du Congo Beige, Belgium.
BERHAUT. R.P. 1953. Les Boerhaavia (Nyctaginacees) du Senegal.
Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France, Paris 100: 48-53.
BOGLE, A.L. 1974. The genera of Nyctaginaceae in the southeastern
United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 1-37.
BOHLIN, J-E. 1988. A monograph of the genus Colignonia (Nyctagi-
naceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 231-252.
BOJER, M.W. 1842. Descriptions de diverses plantes nouvelles de
Madagascar, des ties Comores et de File Maurice. Boerhaavia
Linn. In A.D. Brongniart & J. Decaisne, Annales des Sciences
Naturelles, Botanique 2,18: 188, 189. Fortin, Masson & C.
Libraires-editeurs, Paris.
DOUGLAS, N.A. & MANOS, P.S. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of
Nyctaginaceae: taxonomy, biogeography and characters asso-
ciated with a radiation of xerophytic genera in North America.
American Journal of Botany 96: 856-872.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & MEYER, N.L. 2003. Plants of southern
Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14: 749, 750. National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
HEIMERL. A. 1934. Nyctaginaceae. In A. Engler & K. Prantl, Die
natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2,16c. Duncker & Humblot, Ber-
lin.
HOLMGREN, P.K.. HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index Herbariorum, part I: the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden.
HUTCHINSON, J. & DALZIEL, J.M. 1927. Nyctaginaceae. In J.
Hutchinson & J.M. Dalziel, Flora of West tropical Africa 1,1:
151-153. Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.
KLOPPER, R.R., CHATELAIN, C„ BANNINGER, V„ HABASHI. C„
STEYN, H.M., DE WET, B.C., ARNOLD, T.H., GAUTIER, L„
SMITH, G.F. & SPICHIGER, R. 2006. Checklist of the flower-
ing plants of sub-Saharan Africa. An index of accepted names
and synonyms. South African Botanical Diversity Network
Report No. 42: 506-508. SABONET, Pretoria.
MEIKLE, R.D. 1954 . Nyctaginaceae. In J. Hutchinson & J.M. Dalziel,
Flora of West tropical Africa 1,1: 176-178. Crown Agents for
Oversea Governments and Administrations, London.
MEIKLE, R.D. 1971. Commicarpus boissieri (Heimerl) Cufondontis.
Nyctaginaceae. Tribus Mirabileae. Hooker's leones Plantarum
37: t. 3694. Bentham-Moxon Trustees, Royal Botanical Gardens
Kew, Richmond.
MEIKLE, R.D. 1978. A key to Commicarpus. Notes from the Royal
Botanical Garden Edinburgh 36: 235-249.
MEIKLE, R.D. 1979. Supplementary notes on Commicarpus (Nyctagi-
naceae). Kew Bulletin 34: 341-343.
MEIKLE, R.D. 1983. Additional notes on Commicarpus (Nyctaginace-
ae). Kew Bulletin 38: 48 1 — 484.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1822. Boerhavia helenae. Systema
vegetabilium 1: 73. Stuttgardtiae.
SMITH, J.M. 1976. A taxonomic study of Acleisanthes (Nyctaginace-
ae). Wrightia 5: 261-276.
STANDLEY, PC. 1916. Systematic investigations of tropical American
plants. Contributions from the United States National Herbari-
um 18: 101. Government Printing Office, Washington.
STANNARD, B.L. 1988. Nyctaginaceae. In E. Launert, Flora zambesi-
aca 9,1: 12-28. Halesworth Press, London.
STRUWIG, M„ SIEBERT, S.J., JORDAAN, A. & BURGOYNE, P.M.
2010. Anthocarp structure as a diagnostic character for Boer-
havia L. and Commicarpus Standi, species in southern Africa.
South African Journal of Botany 76: 415, 416.
WHITEHOUSE, C. 1996. Nyctaginaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of
tropical East Africa: 1-19. Balkema, Kew.
WIGHT, R. 1843. Nyctaginea. leones Plantarum Indiae Orientals 3,2:
6, t. 875. Franck, Madras.
WILLSON, J. & SPELLENBERG, R. 1977. Observations on anthocarp
anatomy in the subtribe Mirabilinae (Nyctaginaceae). Madrono
24:104-111.
M. STRUWIG*!, S.J. SIEBERT* and E.S. KLAASSEN**
* A.P. Goossens Herbarium, School of Environmental Sciences and De-
velopment, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, 2520 Potchef-
stroom. South Africa.
j Author for correspondence: madeleen.struwig@nwu.ac.za.
** National Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag X13184, Wind-
hoek, Namibia.
MS. received: 2010-07-05.
AIZOACEAE
NEW COMBINATIONS IN ANTI MIMA AND OCTOPOMA (RUSCHIOIDEAE)
1. A new combination in Antimima for Ruschia pari-
petcila (L. Bolus) L. Bolus
Antimima is a large and still unrevised genus of ±
100 species (Dehn 1989; Hartmann 1998b). Many spe-
cies, most of which were described by L. Bolus, were
not compared with similar species, making it unclear to
which species they were most similar.
Features by which species of Antimima may be re-
cognized include 5(or 6)-locular fruits with large clos-
ing bodies and shallow locules, heterophyllous leaves,
and 1( 3)-fiowered inflorescences (rarely aggregated in
well-developed cymes) (Dehn 1989; Hartmann 1998b).
In addition, the leaves in species of Antimima often have
a papillate epidermal surface, whereas they are typically
smooth in Ruschia. Notably, 6-locular fruits are rare in
both Ruschia and Antimima.
A six-locular species of Ruschia from Namaqua-
land, R. hexamera L. Bolus, was recently found to
be conspecific with Antimima crassifolia (L. Bolus)
H.E.K. Hartmann and to represent the earlier name for
the taxon (Klak 2010). A further collection by Pillans
from Wallekraal near Hondeklip Bay in Namaqualand,
described as R. paripetala by L. Bolus in 1927, is also
very similar to A. hexamera (L. Bolus) Klak. The type
specimens of both A. hexamera and R. paripetala pos-
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
293
sess six-locular fruits with closing bodies and both
lack valve wings; the epidermis of the leaves is papil-
late; the inflorescence is 1-3-flowered; and the petaloid
and filamentous staminodes are pink to white. In addi-
tion, L. Bolus described a further collection by Pillans,
collected between Sendelings Drift and Doornpoort,
as R. paripetala var. occultcms L. Bolus (1929: 125).
This variety was considered a synonym of A. perforata
(L. Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann (Hartmann 1998b). Both
var. occultans and A. perforata have six-locular fruits
and a somewhat similar habit, but differ from R. pari-
petala and A. hexamera by having smaller flowers, up to
14 mm diam. in A. perforata and var. occultans , com-
pared to 27 mm diam. in R. paripetala and A. hexam-
era. Hartmann (2001) described the closing body of R.
paripetala as small (as opposed to large in A. perforata ),
which is generally a characteristic of species of Ruschia.
The somewhat smaller than usual closing body in R.
paripetala may have been the main reason for retain-
ing R. paripetala in Ruschia. However, a reinvestigation
of the closing bodies in the types of R. paripetala , R.
paripetala var. occultans , A. hexamera and A. perforata
found that in none of them were the bodies sufficiently
large to block the entire exit of the locule. The somewhat
smaller size of the closing bodies in A. crassifolia and A.
hexamera was previously discussed by Klak (2010). In
other characteristics, such as the presence of expanding
keels which extend into awns, the shallow locules, the
papillate epidermis and the overall similar habit, the type
specimens are in agreement. The morphological evi-
dence thus suggests that R. paripetala is best placed in
Antimima, where it is the earliest available name for this
group of taxa. The new combination and full synonymy
is given below.
The most northerly collection of this species was
made in the Richtersveld and collections have been
made as far south as Hondeklip Bay in Namaqualand.
Antimima paripetala (L. Bolus) Klak , comb. nov.
Mesembiyanthemum paripetalum L. Bolus, Annals of
the Bolus Herbarium 4: 87 (1927). Ruschia paripetala
(L. Bolus) L. Bolus: 221 (1950). Type: South Africa, [North-
ern Cape], from the coast at Hondeklip Bay, Oct. 1924, Pil-
lans 17759 (BOL, sheet I. lecto.!, here designated).
R. hexamera L. Bolus: 144 (1928). Antimima hexamera (L. Bolus)
Klak: 307 (2010). Type: South Africa, [Northern Cape], hills near
Brakfontein, between Sept, and Oct. 1926, Pillans 5703 (BOL, holo.!).
R. hexamera L.Bolus var. longipetala L. Bolus: 237 (1931), syn.
nov. Type: South Africa, [Northern Cape], Port Nolloth, without date,
M. Schlechter sub SUG8367 (BOL, holo.!).
R. crassifolia L.Bolus: 338 (1958), syn. nov. Antimima crassifolia
(L.Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann: 71 (1998b). Type: South Africa. [Northern
Cape], Lekkersing, June 1954, H. Hall sub BOL25758 (BOL. holo.!).
Additional material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Alexander Bay, along
road from Port Nolloth to Lekkersing, (-BD), 3 Sept. 2001. Klak 776
(BOL); Boegoeberg Suid, (-DC), 26 Oct. 1985, Van Jaarsveld 8229
(NBG). 2916 (Port Nolloth): between Port Nolloth and Holgat, (-
BB). May 1929, Pillans 5766 (BOL). 2917 (Springbok): Vioolsdrif,
between Port Nolloth and Lekkersing, (-AA), 4 Sep. 2001, Klak 780
(BOL); Karrachab Poort. (-AA), 18 July 1970, Wisitra 1625 (NBG).
2. A new combination in Octopoma for Ruschia nana
L.Bolus
Octopoma is a genus of nine species, which can be
subdivided into two groups, one occurring in Namaqua-
land and the other in the Little Karoo (Klak 2010). The
main characteristics of Octopoma , which distinguish
it from Ruschia and Leipolcltia, are the 6- to 8-locular
fruits, with no or only narrow valve wings (Hartmann
1998a). In Ruschia , the fruits are 5(rarely 6)-locular,
with no valve wings or rarely with narrow valve wings,
whereas in Leipoldtia the fruits are ± 10-locular with
broad valve wings. Recently, a new species, Octopoma
tanquanum Klak, was described. This is found in the
Tanqua and Little Karoo and differs from the other spe-
cies of Octopoma by its 6-locular fruits and broad valve
wings (Klak 2010).
Examination of herbarium specimens currently pla-
ced in Ruschia indicates that the little-known species,
R. nana L.Bolus, is conspecific with O. tanquanum.
The type of R. nana was collected at Matjiesfontein by
H. Bolus in September 1908. Unfortunately, this speci-
men lacks fruits, so that the internal morphology of its
capsule remains uncertain. However, the presence of six
calyx lobes and six styles indicate that the fruits would
be 6-locular. The presence of six-locular fruits is very
rare in Ruschia and is an indication that the species may
not belong in Ruschia. A comparison of the type of R.
nana with the type of O. tanquanum shows that both
have extremely similar leaves, which are trigonous,
fused towards the bases and finely serrated along the
keel towards the apex. Also, both type collections have
solitary, cream-coloured flowers and bracteoles which
embrace the base of the flower. Both O. tanquanum
and R. nana flower in late spring to early summer (end
of October to November and December respectively).
Since both type collections are from the Matjiesfontein
area, there is little doubt that the two species are conspe-
cific. The absence of mature fruits on the type of R. nana
could have been one reason why this species was not
previously transferred to Octopoma (Hartmann 1998a).
The following new combination and synonym are pro-
vided.
Octopoma nanum (L.Bolus) Klak , comb. nov.
Ruschia nana L.Bolus, Notes on Mesembryanthemum
and allied genera 2: 75 (1929). Mesembryanthemum
reduction N.E.Br.: 32 non 33 (1930). Type: South Africa.
[Western Cape], Matjiesfontein, Sept. 1908, fl. Cape
Town in Dec. 1908, H. Bolus 15417 (BOL, holo.!).
O. tanquanum Klak: 302 (2010), syn. nov. Type: South Africa,
Western Cape, Tanqua Karoo, 7 km west of Matjiesfontein, Farm Aas-
voelbos, 26 May 2007, Bruyns 10797 (BOL, holo.!).
Additional specimens examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): between Hottentots
Kloof and Sutherland, (-CC), Leipoldt s.n. (BOL).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Karoopoort, (-BA), Little-
wood sub KG534/59 (BOL); east of Karoopoort, (-BB), 17 Aug. 2002,
Bruyns 9158 (BOL); 5.5 miles [8.8 km] from Touws River on Worces-
ter road (-BD), Acocks 15289 (BOL). 3320 (Montagu): Touws River
Dist., Tanqua Karoo, Melkboskraal Farm, (-AA), 12 Sept. 2006, Klak
1373 , (BOL); 7 km west of Matjiesfontein, Aasvoelbos Farm, (-BA),
28 May 2007, Klak 1441 (BOL); Matjiesfontein, (-BA), Pillans 2057
(BOL); Ceres Karoo. Herre SUG10508 (BOL); Bloutoring station, (-
CB), 22 June 2009, Bruyns 11381 (BOL); Sewefontein Farm, (-DA),
Bruyns 11389 (BOL); Tilney Farm, (-DC), 26 May 2002, Bruyns 9025
(BOL).
294
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The National Research Foundation (NRF) is thanked
for financial support towards this study. The Curator of
the Compton Herbarium (NBG) is thanked for permis-
sion to examine herbarium material.
REFERENCES
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1927. Novitates Africanae. Annals of the Bolus Her-
barium 4: 87.
BOLUS. H.M.L. 1928. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 1 : 144.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1929. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. part 2: 75, 125.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1931. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 2: 237.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1950. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 221 .
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1958. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era, part 3: 338.
BROWN, N.E. 1930. Mesembryanthemum. Gardeners' Chronicle ser.
3, 87: 32.
DEHN, M. 1989. Untersuchungen zum Merkmalsbestand und zur Stel-
lungderGattungHnfrm/waN.E.Br. emend. Dehn (Mesembryan-
themaceae Fenzl). MitteiJungen aus dem Institut fur Allgemeine
Botanik Hamburg 22: 189-215.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998a. New combinations in Ruschioideae,
based on studies in Ruschia (Aizoaceae). Bradleya 16: 44-91.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 1998b. New combinations in Antimima (Rus-
chioideae, Aizoaceae) from southern Africa. Bothalia 28: 67-82.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 2001. Illustrated handbook of succulent plants:
Aizoaceae F-Z. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
KLAK, C. 2010. Three new species and two new combinations, in the
Aizoaceae from the Western and Northern Cape of South Africa.
South African Journal of Botany 76: 299-307.
C. KLAK*
* Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, Cape
Town. E-mail: Cornelia. Klak@uct.ac.za.
MS. received: 2010-10-29.
VITACEAE
A NEW AND AN OVERLOOKED RECORD OF CYPHOSTEMMA IN ANGOLA
The family Vitaceae was recently catalogued for
Plants of Angola (Figueiredo & Smith 2008) by Retief
(2008), who recognised 20 species in the genus. During
ongoing work on the flora of Angola, two additional
species of Cyphostemma (Planch.) Alston were recently
newly recorded for the country. These are Cyphostemma
wittei (Staner) Wild & R.B.Drumm. and C. congestion
(Baker) Desc. ex Wild & R.B.Drumm. C. congestion had
already been recorded for Angola in an obscure publica-
tion that was overlooked by previous reviewers of the
family in Angola.
Cyphostemma congestum (Baker) Desc. ex Wild
& R.B.Drumm. in Flora zambesiaca 2,2: 473 (1966). Vitis
congesta Baker in Oliv.: 412 (1868). Cissits congesta
(Baker) Planch, in A. DC. & C.DC.: 590 (1887). Cypho-
stemma congestion (Baker) Desc.: 120 (1960), comb,
inval. [ICBN Art. 33.4, no clear indication of basionym].
Type: Angola, Chibiza, Meller s.n. (K, holo.).
Cissus fleckii Schinz: 640 (1908a). Cyphostemma fleckii (Schinz)
Desc.: 121 (1960), comb, inval. [ICBN Art. 33.4, no clear indication
of basionym], Cyphostemma fleckii (Schinz) Desc.: 221 (1967). Type:
South West Africa [Namibia], Hereroland, Fleck 762 (Z, holo.).
Cissus amboensis Schinz: 699 (1908b). Type: South West Africa
[Namibia], Hereroland, Dinter 186 (syn.), Amboland, Wulfhorst 176 (syn. ).
Cyphostemma congestum has been recorded from
Namibia, Botswana, South Africa, Mozambique, Zam-
bia and Zimbabwe (African Plants Database 2010). This
species shows variation in the density of stem glands:
in Namibia in the west, the stems can be moderately to
sparsely glandular, while they are more so towards the
eastern parts of its distribution range. The PRE speci-
mens from the Angolan side of the Ruacana Falls, cited
below, have stems that are puberulous with multicellular
hairs, without capitate glandular hairs.
Merxmuller & Schreiber (1969) synonymized Cis-
sus amboensis with Cyphostemma congestum and men-
tioned the occurrence of the taxon in Angola. This was
overlooked by Retief (2008). The specimens listed here
confirm the occurrence of C. congestum in Angola.
Specimens examined
ANGOLA. — Cunene, Ruacana Falls, 30 April 1962, Kotze 57
(PRE!); Cunene, top of Ruacana Falls on Angolan side, 30 April 1962,
Ry croft 2423 (PRE!). Figure 4.
Cyphostemma wittei (Staner) Wild & R.B.Drumm.
in Kirkia 2: 141 (1961). Cissus wittei Staner in Wildeman
& Staner: 49 (1932). Type: from Congo (Katanga).
Cyphostemma wittei was previously only known from
the Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania and Zam-
bia. It is a variable species with the stems sometimes
glandular, whereas in other cases they are eglandular.
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Cyphostemma congestum. •; and C. wit-
tei, A. in Angola.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
295
This variation has even been encountered on the same
plant (Milne-Redhead 2839, K, cited by Wild & Drum-
mond 1966). The stems on the LISC specimen from
Angola cited below are eglandular.
Specimen examined
ANGOLA. — Moxico, Cameia, Barros Machado ANG.XII. 54-51
(LISC!). Figure 4.
The two new records bring the total number of
Cyphostemma species known for the country, to 22.
Nine of these known Angolan species of Cyphostemma
are endemic.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Ms Joana Abreu for providing additional
information from LISC herbarium. Ms Ronell Klop-
per of SANBI’s Biosystematics Division, Pretoria, is
thanked for kindly preparing the distribution map. An
anonymous referee is thanked for collegial contributions.
REFERENCES
AFRICAN PLANTS DATABASE (version 3.3). 2010. Conservatoire
et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Geneve and South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, http://www.ville-ge.ch/
musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/ (accessed August 2010).
CANDOLLE, A.L.P.P. DE & CANDOLLE, A.C.P. DE. 1887. Mono-
graphiae Phanerogamarum. Prodromi nunc continuatio, nunc
revisio auctoribus Alphonso et Casimir de Candolle aliisque
botanicis ultra memoratis. Part 5,2: 305-654. Masson, Paris.
DESCOINGS, B. 1960. Un genre meconnu de Vitacees: comprehension
et distinction des genres Cissus L. et Cyphostemma (Planch.)
Alston. Notulae Systematicae 16: 113-125.
DESCOINGS, B. 1967. Note rectificative a propos de la nomenclature
des Cyphostemma (Vitacees). Naturalia Monspeliensia , Serie
Botanique, 18: 226.
FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2008. Plants of Angola/Plantas de
Angola. Strelitzia 22. South African National Biodiversity Ins-
titute, Pretoria.
MERXMULLER, H. & SCHREIBER, A. 1969. 80.Vitaceae. Prodro-
mus einer Flora von Siidwestafrika : 1-8.
OLIVER, D. 1868. Flora of tropical Africa, vol. 1. Reeve, Ashford,
Kent.
RETIEF, E. 2008. Vitaceae. In E. Figueiredo & G.F. Smith, Plants of
Angola/Plantas de Angola, Strelitzia 22: 1 68, 1 69. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
SCHINZ, H. 1908a. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Afrikanischen Flora
(suite). Bulletin de I’Herbier Boissier, ser. 2, 8: 625-640.
SCHINZ, H. 1908b. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Afrikanischen Flora
(suite). Bulletin de I'Herbier Boissier, ser. 2, 8: 699-703.
WILD, H. & DRUMMOND, R.B. 1961. Vitaceae from the Flora zam-
besiaca area: 2. Kirkia 2: 132-143.
WILD, H. & DRUMMOND, R.B. 1966. Vitaceae. In E. Launert, Flora
zambesiaca 2, 2: 439^192. Flora Zambesiaca Managing Com-
mittee, London.
WILDEMAN, E. DE & STANER. P. 1932. Contribution a l ’etude de
la Flore du Katanga, supplement 4: 1-1 16. D. van Keerberghen,
Bruxelles.
F. DE SOUSA*, E. FIGUEIREDO** and G.F. SMITH***
* Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg,
Box 461, SE-40530 Goteborg, Sweden. E-mail: filipedeportugal@gmail.com.
** Department of Botany, P.O.Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Uni-
versity, Port Elizabeth, 6031 South Africa / Centre for Functional Ecology,
Departamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455 Coim-
bra, Portugal. E-mail: estrelafigueiredo@hotmail.com (corresponding author).
*** Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections, South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria
/ H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria / Centre for Functional Ecology,
Departamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-
455 Coimbra, Portugal. E-mail: g.smith@sanbi.org.za.
MS. received: 2010-08-22.
APOCYNACEAE (ASCLEPIADOIDEAE-CEROPEGIEAE)
FIRST RECORDS OF ORBEA COOPERI IN GAUTENG AND MPUMALANGA PROVINCES, FSA REGION
The last full revision of the genus Orbea (N.E.Br.)
L.C. Leach by Bruyns (2002), consisted of 56 species
distributed throughout Africa and southwestern Arabia
with ± 3 1 species south of the equator and ± 24 in South
Africa (Bruyns 2002, 2005). As a result of some taxo-
nomic changes, more species were moved to the genus
(Plowes 2004, 2007; Bruyns 2005; Raffaelli et al. 2008;
Meve 2009) bringing the total in Orbea to the current 61
species (sensu Bruyns).
The current known distribution records show that
Orbea cooperi (N.E.Br.) L.C. Leach occurs in the drier
western and central interior of South Africa. Charles
Craib and Gillian Condy, Warren McCleland, Tony de
Castro and eventually the second author reported the
existence of an Orbea (presumably O. cooperi) from
Mpumalanga during 2008-2009. New distribution
records were also collected from the Devon area (Leeu-
kop, Gauteng) and near Greylingstad (Platkop, Mpuma-
langa). The new records constitute a northeastern exten-
sion of the distribution range of O. cooperi (Figure 5).
The habitat at the new sites is stony ground characterized
by dolerite outcrops and sheets, surrounded by grassland
with predominantly black turf soil. O. cooperi grows
amongst the rocks in these dolerite outcrops. This habi-
tat becomes waterlogged and muddy in spring and sum-
mer after rain. As the season progresses, the soil dries
out and becomes hard and cracked in winter. Associated
species found at these localities include succulents such
as Crassula setnlosa and Euphorbia clavarioides, the
karroid dwarf shrub, Eriocephalus karooicus and herbs,
including Lessertia cf. depressa and Jamesbrittenia
stricta, intermixed with other herbs and grasses.
At first, the new records were thought to represent a
new species or subspecies based on the flowers that were
produced by various cuttings grown in the nursery of the
Pretoria National Botanical Garden (PNBG). The flow-
ers of these plants were devoid of vibratile hairs (mar-
ginal cilia) and were much smaller than the reported size
for Orbea cooperi (Figure 6). The exact same plants
grown in the PNBG’s nursery did, however, in the third
296
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
TABLE 1. — Comparison of main characters to distinguish between
Orbea cooperi and O. tapscottii
FIGURE 5. — Known distribution adapted from Bruyns 2005 of Orbea
tapscottii (shaded light grey) and O. cooperi (shaded dark grey).
Point records for material housed at PRE as follows: Orbea
tapscottii, •; O. cooperi, ▲ . New distributions of O. cooperi
reported here, ■ (both sight records and herbarium specimens
at PRE).
year of flowering produce normal-sized flowers. In addi-
tion, the second author also collected flowering mate-
rial from a site in the vicinity of Greylingstad, Mpuma-
langa, that was furnished with vibratile hairs. Therefore,
the first author could confirm in 2009 that all these new
records were Orbea cooperi.
The first sterile cutting presented by Craib was
thought to be Orbea tapscottii (I.Verd.) L.C. Leach.
Orbea cooperi and O. tapscottii are closely related.
The main distinguishing characters are listed in Table
1 for comparison. It lias been proposed that because of
the absence of marginal cilia in the Devon population,
it may warrant assignment of subspecific rank (Darrel
Plowes pers. comm.). The authors are, however, uncer-
tain whether this would be wise, as specimens from the
Leeukop population do possess marginal cilia. Although
no other populations between Devon and Leeukop have
been located, the habitats are similar to each other and
markedly dissimilar to other habitats of O. cooperi.
Proper investigation of a large quantity of flowers at each
population needs to be done in order to resolve this issue.
This new distribution is, however, disjunct from any
of the other known collections made of this species.
This may indicate (as for many other species) that vast
areas still need to be surveyed in order to ascertain the
complete distribution range of this taxon (and many oth-
ers). In addition, the vegetation at the newly discovered
locations in Mpumalanga is open grassland with pre-
dominantly black turf interspersed by dolerite outcrops
and intrusions, which makes that habitat quite unusual
for this taxon. The distribution of Orbea cooperi and its
nearest relative O. tapscottii is given in Figure 5. The
listed new records all come from an area between the
distribution ranges of these two sister species. Orbea
tapscottii is usually associated with acacia savanna and
O. cooperi is mainly found in both karoo and acacia
savanna vegetation.
Voucher specimens of new collections of Orbea cooperi
GAUTENG. — 2628 (Johannesburg): Highveld Bridge, Farm Leeuwkop,
±2.15 km directly N of Devon, 26°20'06.7" S, 28°47'01.0" E, (-BD), fl.
13-11-2008, Bester 8539 (PRE!).
MPUMALANGA. — 2628 (Johannesburg): Balfour Dist., Farm
Platkop just outside Greylingstad, 26°4T00" S, 28°5T41" E, (-DB),
fl. 29-11-2009, Berruti 53A (PRE!); 26°4T02.58" S, 28°51'41.46" E,
FIGURE 6.— Flower and stems of Orbea cooperi from Leeukop locality, Bester 8539: A, vertical view; B, angled side view. Scale bars: A, B, 6
mm.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
297
Berruti 53B (PRE!); 26°40'59.76" S, 28°51'42.6" E, fl. 3-10-2009, Bei-
ruti 52 (PRE!); Lucas Kloppers' farm, 26°39’49.92" S, 28°51'57.78" E
(sight record, S. Berruti); Farm Platkop, 543 1R, rocky area adjacent
to district road. 26°39'46" S, 28°51'54" E, fl. 22-02-2009, McCleland
PRE850944 (PRE! in spirits).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Tony de Castro, Warren McCleland, Charles Craib
and Gillian Condy are thanked for bringing the location
of this species to our attention. We are grateful to Mpu-
malanga Parks Board for granting a collection permit for
obtaining the material.
REFERENCES
BRUYNS, P.V. 2002. Monograph of Orbea and Ballvanthus ( Apocynace-
ae-Asclepiadoideae-Ceropegieae). Systematic Botany Mono-
graphs 63: 1-195.
BRUYNS, P.V. 2005. Stapeliads of southern Africa and Madagascar ,
vol. 1. Umdaus Press, Hatfield, Pretoria.
MEVE, U. 2009. Taxonomic changes in Arabian taxa of Orbea Haw.
(Ceropegieae). Asklepios 105: 19-22.
PLOWES, D.C.H. 2004. Orbea elegans Plowes sp. nov. , an attractive
new stapeliad from northern South Africa (Apocynaceae-Ascle-
piadoideae-Ceropegieae). Asklepios 90: 14—17.
PLOWES, D.C.H. 2007. Two new stapeliads from Yemen. Excelsa 21:
11-14.
PLOWES, D.C.H. 2008. Angolluma taitica (Bruyns) Plowes comb. nov.
Asklepios 103: 4.
PLOWES. D.C.H. 2009. The Transkei Orbea saga. Asklepios 105: 9-18.
PLOWES. D.C.H. 2010. When is a Cara/luma not a CarallumaP. Ask-
lepios 107: 3-22.
RAFFAELLI, M„ MOST1, S. & TRADELLI, M. 2008. Apocynaceae of
Oman: Orbea nardii, sp. nov. and Pentatropis bentii, first find-
ing. Webbia 63: 161-167.
S.P. BESTER* and S.M. BERRUTI**
* Author for correspondence: National Herbarium (PRE), South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria.
E-mail: S.Bester@sanbi.org.za.
** School of Environmental Sciences and Development, Private Bag
X6001, North-West University, 2520 Potchefstroom / P.O. Box 426,
2415 Greylingstad.
MS. received: 2010-08-18.
HYACINTHACEAE
ORNITHOGALUM LEBAENSE TRANSFERRED TO ALBUCA
Extensive phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and plas-
tid DNA sequence data has unequivocally demonstrated
that Ornithogalum L. is paraphyletic as traditionally
circumscribed (e.g. Obermeyer 1978). Two alternative,
generic treatments for subfamily Omithogaloideae have
recently been proposed, both derived essentially from
the same data set and representing alternative hierar-
chical treatments of comparable monophyletic groups.
The more conservative (Manning et al. 2009) recog-
nizes four genera: Dipcadi Medik. and Pseudogaltonia
(Kuntze) Engl, remain as conventionally circumscribed;
Albuca L. is enlarged to include Ornithogalum subgen.
Osmyne and subgen. Urophyllotr, and Ornithogalum
includes the remaining species in the genus plus Galto-
nia Decne. and Neopatersonia Schonland. In this sys-
tem. the major lineages within Albuca and Ornithoga-
lum are treated as subgenera and sections. The second
option ( Martinez- Azorin et al. 2011) is a much more
radical departure from the traditional classification,
treating all major lineages at generic level, resulting in
the recognition of 19 genera in the subfamily, many of
them new. Although theoretically defensible, the practi-
cal value of this option in sub-Saharan Africa is severely
limited by the low level of morphological support for
several of the genera. One consequence of this is that
the South African species O. toxicarium C. Archer &
R.H. Archer remains unplaced in this classification until
molecular data are forthcoming.
The recently described Ornithogalum lebaense Van
Jaarsv. (2010) from Angola is currently unplaced in
either classification but is closely allied to the taxon
previously treated as O. longibracteatum Jacq. (Ober-
meyer 1978) and now treated either as Albuca bracte-
ata (Thunb.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt (Manning et al.
2009) or as Stellarioides canaliculata Medik. (Martinez-
Azorin et al. 2011). As we have already argued (Man-
ning et al. 2009), we favour a more conservative treat-
ment of the genera and have already implemented this
treatment in various local floras. We therefore advo-
cate treating this species in Albuca subgen. Urophvllon
(Salisb.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt and provide the req-
uisite new combination to facilitate this.
Albuca lebaensis (Van Jaarsv.) J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt , comb. nov. Ornithogalum lebaense Van
Jaarsv. in Herbertia 64: 92 (2010).
REFERENCES
MANNING. J.C., FOREST, F., DEVEY, D.S., FAY, M.F. & GOLD-
BLATT. P. 2009. A molecular phylogeny and a revised classifica-
tion of Omithogaloideae (Hyacinthaceae) based on an analysis
of four plastid DNA regions. Taxon 58: 77-107.
MARTINEZ-AZORIN, M„ CRESPO, M.B., JUAN, A. & FAY, M.
2011. Molecular phylogenetics of subfamily Omithogaloideae
(Hyacinthaceae) based on nuclear and plastid DNA regions,
including a new taxonomic arrangement. Annals of Botany 107:
1-37.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1978. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern
African species. Bothalia 12: 323-376.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 2010. Ornithogalum lebaense, a new cliff-
dwelling Ornithogalum (Hyacinthaceae) from southwest Angola
(Benguella Province). Herbertia 64: 91-103.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town / Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, 3209 Scottsville, South Africa.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den. P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2011-03-31.
298
FABACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF XIPHOTHECA FROM THE WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
Xiphotheca Eckl. & Zeyh. is a papilionaceous genus
which belongs to the tribe Podalyrieae, together with
Amphithalea Eckl. & Zeyh., Liparia L., Podalyria Lam.,
Stirtonanthus B.-E.van Wyk & A.L.Schutte, Cyclopia
Vent., Virgilia Poir. and Calpurnia E.Mey. (Schutte &
Van Wyk 1 998).
In a taxonomic revision of the genus, Schutte (1997)
recognized nine distinct species, all of which are
endemic to the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa.
Based on a cladistic analysis of morphological data, two
sections were established within the genus: Xiphotheca
sect. Congestae A.L.Schutte, comprising four species
(all with congested, non-pedunculate inflorescence units
and the lower calyx lobe longer than the lateral lobes)
and X. sect. Xiphotheca, comprising five species (all
with extended and pedunculate flowering units and the
lower calyx lobe as long as the lateral lobes).
While doing field work during 2000 and 2001 as part
of the Cape Lowland Project of the Botanical Society of
South Africa, Nick Flelme collected an odd specimen in
the Overberg area. Follow-up field work confirmed that
it is indeed an unknown species of Xiphotheca. This spe-
cies is described below.
Xiphotheca rosmarinifolia A.L.Schutte , sp. nov.,
X. phylicoidi A.L.Schutte & B.-E.van Wyk similis, sed
foliis angustioribus, floribus minoribus, pedunculis,
pedicellis bracteisque brevioribus differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3420 (Bredasdorp): 33 km
NE of Bredasdorp on Farm Plaatjieskraal 54; 0.6 km
NW of farmhouse on road to Sonderkoskop, 240 m, (-
AD), 1 Aug. 2001, N.A. Helme 2086 (NBG, holo.).
Erect, multi-stemmed shrub, up to 0.5 m tall, sprout-
ing from woody rootstock after fire. Branches seri-
ceous, glabrescent. Leaves alternate, simple, 10-16 x
1-2 mm, lamina linear, with strongly revolute margins,
pubescent on adaxial surface, glabrescent, densely seri-
ceous on abaxial surface, apex acute; petiole ± 1 mm
long, sericeous; stipules inconspicuous. Inflorescences
axillary, with paired (geminate) flowers, grouped into
flowering units of up to 20 flowers; peduncle short, < 1
mm long, sericeous. Bracts linear, ± 1 mm long, fused
at base with pedicel for 0.5 mm. Pedicel 3 mm long,
sericeous. Bracteoles minute, situated at thickening on
pedicel. Corolla yellow, fading brown with age, longer
than calyx, glabrous. Calyx narrowed to base, not intru-
sive; lobes triangular, acuminate; upper two lobes fused
higher up than lower three lobes; lower lobe as long as
upper four lobes, pubescent. Standard petal suborbicu-
lar, apex emarginate, base cuneate. Wing petals oblong,
longer than keel; auricle weakly developed, pocket
developed as a thickened lobe towards inside, incon-
spicuous on outer surface. Keel petals oblong, pocket
weakly developed, apex obtuse. Stamens diadelphous,
vexillary filament free; anthers ± uniform in shape and
size, alternately dorsifixed and sub-basifixed. Ovary
with 2 or 3 ovules, densely sericeous; pistil sessile; style
slender, curved upwards, glabrous. Pods coriaceous.
obliquely oblong, laterally compressed, constricted
between seeds, 2- or 3-seeded, densely pubescent, gla-
brescent. Seeds oblong-reniform, brown to deep dark
brown; hilum elliptic, surrounded by a fleshy collar-like
aril. Flowering time : August (flowering after fire). Fig-
ure 7.
Diagnostic features and affinities : Xiphotheca ros-
marinifolia falls within X. sect. Xiphotheca, owing to
its characteristic pedunculate inflorescences, extended
flowering units and the lower lobe of the calyx being as
long as the lateral lobes. Within this section, it is closely
related to X. phylicoides — both species are sprouters and
both have leaves with strongly revolute margins. How-
ever, X. rosmarinifolia differs from X. phylicoides in the
narrower and linear leaves, 1-2 mm wide, the shorter
peduncle (< 1 mm long), bracts (± 1 mm long) and pedi-
cel (3 mm long). In X. phylicoides the leaves are 2. 5-5.0
mm wide and elliptic, the peduncle is 1.5-2. 5 mm long,
the bracts are 3^1 mm long and the pedicel is 3. 5-5.0
mm long. The two species are allopatric, with the latter
recorded from three localities on the Outeniqua Mtns
near Mossel Bay, whereas X. rosmarinifolia is known
only from a single locality near Bredasdorp.
The specific epithet refers to the leaves that resemble
those of the well-known herb, rosemary.
Distribution and habitat, the species is known only
from the type locality on the Farm Plaatjieskraal near
Bredasdorp (Figure 8), where it was discovered by Nick
Helme in 2001. It grows in Renosterbos-Fynbos transi-
tional vegetation in a very dry habitat on the northwest-
ern slope of a silcrete hill in deep, pink, clayey soil with
white quartz pebbles.
The type material was collected in flower during
August 2001, following a fire in summer earlier that
year. This species appears to flower only within the
first year after a fire. Follow-up visits to the site during
spring in subsequent years confirmed this observation.
Conservation : Xiphotheca rosmarinifolia appears to
be a very restricted species, known from only a single
location in the Lower Breede River Valley. Despite addi-
tional field work in the area, no more populations could
be found. This species is seriously threatened because it
grows in an area of high agricultural potential that could
be ploughed in future. In addition, the area is subject to
inappropriate fire management and grazing by livestock.
Less than 200 mature individuals are known. Hence the
species is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) in Rai-
mondo et al. (2009).
According to Mucina & Rutherford (2006) the vegetation
type in the area is classified as Eastern Ruens Shale Renos-
terveld, which is classified as Critically Endangered, since
over 80 % of the original extent of this vegetation has been
lost, mainly for cropland. The Farm Plaatjieskraal harbours
one of the largest remaining patches of this vegetation type
in the Overberg area. Several other threatened species have
also been recorded from this site: Acmadenia macropetala
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
299
FIGURE 7. — Xiphotheca rosmarinifolia. A— I, Helme 2086, NBG: A, flowering branch, showing arrangement of flowers; B, leaf abaxial view, show-
ing revolute margins; C, flower in lateral view; D, calyx (upper lobes to left); E, standard petal, adaxial view; F, wing petal; G, keel petal; H,
anthers; I, pistil. J, K, Vlok & Schulte 445, NBG: J, pod in lateral view; K, seed. Scale bars: A, J (at A), 5 mm; B-G, I, K (at B), 5 mm; H, 1
mm. Artist: A.L.Schutte-Vlok.
FIGURE 8. — Known distribution of
Xiphotheca rosmarinifolia.
(VU = Vulnerable), Acrodon deminutus (VU), Aspalathus
grobleri (EN = Endangered), Brownanthus fratermis (EN),
Drosanthemum quadratum (EN), Erica venustiflora subsp.
glandulosa (VU), Gibbaeum haaglenii (EN), Leucadendron
coriaceum (EN) and Relhania gamotii (VU) (pers. obs.;
N.A. Helme pers. comm. ). The site is therefore of very high
conservation significance and every effort should be made to
secure this site under the Stewardship programme of Cape-
Nature (Western Cape Nature Conservation Board).
Other material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): Farm Plaatjieskraal, NE
of Bredasdorp, on silcrete hill NW of fannhouse on road to Sonderkos-
kop, (-AD), 09-09-2001, J.H.J. Vlok & A.L. Schutte 445 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am very grateful to Nick Helme for bringing the col-
lection to my attention. CapeNature is thanked for gran-
300
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
ting me the opportunity to take sabbatical leave. This
publication stems from the revision of Xiphotheca which
formed part of a Ph.D. thesis in Botany at the Rand Afri-
kaans University (now University of Johannesburg). I
am indebted to Prof. B.-E. van Wyk for supervising the
study. My husband, Jan Vlok, kindly accompanied and
assisted me on field trips. Dr O. Leistner kindly assisted
with the translation of the diagnosis into Latin.
REFERENCES
MUCINA. L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
RAIMONDO, D„ VON STADEN, L„ FODEN, W„ VICTOR, J.E.,
HELME, N.A., TURNER, R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MAN-
YAMA, P.A. (eds). 2009. Red List of South African plants 2009.
Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pre-
toria.
SCHUTTE, A.L. 1997. A revision of the genus Xiphotheca (Fabaceae).
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 90-102.
SCHUTTE, A.L. & VAN WYK, B-E. 1998. Evolutionary relationships
in the Podalyrieae and Liparieae (Fabaceae) based on morpho-
logical, cytological and chemical evidence. Plant Systematics &
Evolution 209: 1-31.
A.L. SCHUTTE-VLOK*
* Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johan-
nesburg, P.O. Box 524, 2006 Auckland Park, Johannesburg. Present ad-
dress: CapeNature, Private Bag X658, 6620 Oudtshoom, South Africa.
MS. received: 2010-03-17.
CYPERACEAE
NEW NAMES AND NEW COMBINATIONS IN CYPERUS FOR SOUTHERN AFRICA
Since the genus Mariscus Vahl is no longer upheld
(Archer 2000) and the genus Monandrus Vorster was
never published, several taxa treated by Vorster (1978)
for southern Africa require new combinations or new
names in Cyperus L. in order to reflect current taxo-
nomic treatments incorporating molecular data (Muasya
et al. 2009; Huygh eta!. 2010).
1. Cyperus atriceps (Kiik.) C. Archer & Goetgh.,
comb. & stat. nov. Types: South West Africa [Namibia],
Grootfontein, Dinter 73 7 7 (B*, lecto., here designated-
PRE, photo.!; B** (second sheet), K, PRE!).
C. aristatus Rottb. var. atriceps Kiik. in Mitteilungen des Tluiring-
ischen Botanischen Vereins 2, 50: 8 ( 1943). Mariscus aristatus (Rottb.)
Cherm. var. atriceps (Kiik.) Podlech: 523 (1960).
Monandrus atriceps (Kiik.) Vorster, comb. nov. ined.: 333 (1978).
Vorster (1978) found this to be a distinctive species,
widely distributed in Namibia, Botswana and central
South Africa. In his key, based on fruit characters, he
distinguished it from Cyperus squarrosus L. (syn. C.
aristatus Rottb.) by ‘Fruits obovoid, covered with coni-
cal sparsely-spaced papillae’ vs ‘Fruits obpyramidal,
covered with closely-spaced flat-topped papillae’.
2. Cyperus austro-africanus C. Archer & Goetgh.,
nom. nov. Type: South Africa, Eastern Cape, Basche,
Drege 4383 (B, lecto., designated by Vorster (1981); B
(second sheet), P (three sheets), S).
Mariscus dregeamts Kunth, Enumeratio plantarum 2: 120 (1837);
Vorster: 245 (1978), non Cyperus dregeanus Kunth [= C. pulcher
Thunb.].
M. dregeanus var. buchananii C.B. Clarke: 188 (1897). Type: Natal
[KwaZulu-Natal], Durban Flat, Buchanan s.n. (K, holo.).
M. dubius sens. lat. : auctt. plur.
Due to the pre-existing Cyperus dregeanus Kunth, the
species requires a new name upon transfer to Cyperus
[cf. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature Art.
* Sheet bearing Kiikenthal’s determinavit label dated 1 2.vi. 1 937.
** Sheet bearing Kiikenthal’s determinavit label dated 2.i. 1 940.
53.1 (McNeill et al. 2006)]; the chosen epithet describes
the almost exclusively southern African distribution of
this taxon.
3. Cyperus decurvatus (C.B. Clarke) C. Archer
& Goetgh., comb. & stat. nov. Type: Mocambique
[Mozambique], Ressano Garcia, Schlechter 11952 (K,
holo.-PRE, photo.!; B, BOL, BR, G, GRA, PRE!, Z).
Mariscus vestitus (Hochst.) C.B. Clarke var. ? decurvata C.B. Clarke
in Botanischer Jahrbucher 38: 134 (1906). Cyperus indecorus Kunth
var. decun’atus (C.B. Clarke) Kiik.: 545 (1936). Mariscus indecorus
(Kunth) Podlech var. decurvatus (C.B. Clarke) Podlech: 524 (1960).
C. indecorus Kunth var. dinteri Kiik.: 545 (1936). Mariscus inde-
corus (Kunth) Podlech var. dinteri (Kiik.) Podlech: 524 (1960). Type:
South West Africa [Namibia], Gneisberge bei Farm Hoffnung, 1 700
m, Dinter 2724 (B, SAM).
Mariscus rehmannianus C.B. Clarke: 196 (1898); Vorster: 280
(1978), non Cyperus rehmannianus (C.B. Clarke) Kuntze [= Pycreus
rehmannianus C.B. Clarke], Type: South Africa, Transvaal [Gauteng],
lagoon near Pienaars River, Nelson 13 (K-PRE, photo.!); Pretoria,
Rehmann 4479 (K-PRE, photo.!, Z-PRE, photo.!); Transvaal, without
precise locality, Holub s.n. (K-PRE, photo.!).
According to Vorster (1978: 280), the sheet of Sch-
lechter 11952 at B has the name Mariscus rehman-
nianus inscribed in Clarke's handwriting. There is no
inscription on any of the sheets relating to M. vestitus
var. decurvatus ; however, the K sheet, which has ample
material, is presumed to be the holotype.
4. Cyperus palmatus (Lye) C. Archer & Goetgh.,
comb. & stat. nov. Type: Tanganyika [Tanzania], Ufipa
Dist., Milepa-Zimba, Bullock 3625 (K, holo.).
C. usitatus Burch, subsp. palmatus Lye in Nordic Journal of Bot-
any 3: 228, fig. 22 (1983).
C. fulgens C.B. Clarke var. contractus Kiik.: 122 (1935), non Cype-
rus contractus Steud. Type: South West Africa [Namibia], Amboland
[Ovamboland], Otjituo, auf dem sandige Boden des Omuramba-Oma-
lako, Dinter 894 (B, holo.-PRE, photo.!; K-PRE, photo.!, SAM-PRE,
photo.!).
C. fulgens sens, lat.: Podlech: 14 (1967).
C. palmatus Vorster, sp. nov. ined.: 347 (1978).
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
301
In addition to Tanzania, this species is recorded from
northern South Africa, Zambia and Kenya. The first
author has not seen the type or cited specimens of Cype-
rus usitatus subsp. palmatus, but is convinced from the
description and illustration provided that the synonymy
listed above all relates to this taxon. It appears to be
coincidental that Vorster (1978) used the same epithet
for his new species as Lye (1983) did for his new sub-
species.
The species undoubtedly belongs to the group includ-
ing Cyperus fulgens and C. usitatus (plus several more
in tropical Africa), all of which produce small, tunicated
corms (not often collected) distant from the plant base at
the tips of very thin, easily broken rhizomes. This group
does require revision, but C. palmatus has such a dis-
tinctive inflorescence form (aptly described by the spe-
cific epithet) that in the interim it is preferable to treat it
at species level.
5. Cyperus uitenhagensis (Steud.) C.Archer &
Goetgh ., comb. nov. Type: South Africa, Eastern Cape,
Uitenhagen [Uitenhage], Zeyher 91 (B, holo.-PRE,
photo.!).
Mariscus uitenhagensis Steud., Synopsis plantarum glumacearum.
2. Cyperaceae: 317 (1855); Vorster: 253 (1978).
Mariscus marlothii (Boeck.) C.B. Clarke var. globospica
C.B. Clarke: 187 (1897). Cyperus capensis (Steud.) Endl. var. pseu-
domarlothii forma globospica (C.B.Clarke) Kuk.: 540 (1936). Type:
South Africa, Western Cape Province, Uniondale Div., rocky hill near
Groot River, Burchett 5020 (K, holo.: PRE [fragment]!).
C. capensis (Steud.) Engl. var. pseudomarlothii K.iik.: 540 (1936).
Types: South Africa, Transvaal [Gauteng], Pretoria, Rehmann 4035 (B,
K, Z), 4728 (not seen); Mogg 578 (K. PRE!); [Pretoria], Hiigel liber
Aapies Rivier, Rehmann 4324 (B. Z); Johannesburg, Moss 5924 (J, K);
Transvaal [Mpumalanga], Witbank. Rogers 2569 (J, GRA, Z); Natal
[KwaZulu-Natal], Pietermaritzburg. Wilms 2359 (K); Mozambique,
Ressano Garcia bei Lourenco Marques, Schlechter 11926 [= C. austro-
africanus\, 11950 (B, Z). Note: C. capensis var. polyanthemus Kuk.:
540 (1936) was treated as a synonym of Mariscus chersinus N.E.Br.
[Cyperus chersinus (N.E.Br.) Kuk.].
Mariscus marlothii sensu C.B.Clarke: 590 (1894) non (Boeck.)
C.B.Clarke.
M. capensis sensu Schonland: 29 (1922), p.p., non (Steud.) Schrad.
REFERENCES
ARCHER, C. 2000. Cyperaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of south-
ern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 594-605.
CLARKE, C.B. 1894. Cyperaceae. In T. Durand & H. Schinz, Conspec-
tus florae Africae 5: 526-692. Charles vande Weghe, Brussels.
CLARKE, C.B. 1897. Cyperaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora cap-
ensis 7: 149-192. Reeve, Kent.
CLARKE, C.B. 1898. Cyperaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora cap-
ensis 7: 193-310. Reeve, Kent.
CLARKE, C.B. 1906. Cyperaceae africanae. In A. Engler, Beitrage zur
Flora von Afrika 29. Botanische Jahrbiicher 38: 131-136.
HUYGH. W„ LARRIDON, I„ REYNDERS, M„ MUASYA, A.M.,
GOVAERTS, R„ SIMPSON, D.A. & GOETGHEBEUR, P.
2010. Nomenclature and typification of names of genera and
subdivisions of genera in Cypereae (Cyperaceae): 1. Names of
genera in the Cyperus clade. Taxon 59: 1883-1890.
KUNTH, C.S. 1837. Enumeratio plantarum 2. Cotta, Stuttgart.
KUKENTHAL, G. 1935. Cyperaceae-Scirpoideae-Cypereae. In A.
Engler, Das Pflanzenreich Fam. IV, 20, Heft 101 : 1-160. Engel-
mann, Berlin.
KUKENTHAL, G. 1936. Cyperaceae-Scirpoideae-Cypereae. In A.
Engler, Das Pflanzenreich Fam. IV, 20, Heft 101: 161-671.
Engelmann, Berlin.
KUKENTHAL, G. 1943. Neue oder nicht geniigend bekannte Cypera-
ceen. Mitteilungen des Thuringischen Botanischen Vereins N.F.
50: 1-13.
LYE, K.A. 1983. Studies in African Cyperaceae 25. New taxa and com-
binations in Cyperus L. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 213-232.
MCNEILL, J., BARRIE, F.R.. BURDET, H.M.. DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J., SILVA, P.C., SKOG, J.E., W1ERSEMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature (Vienna Code). Regnum Vegetabile 146.
MUASYA, A.M., VRIJDAGHS, A.. SIMPSON, D.A., CHASE, M.W.,
GOETGHEBEUR, P. & SMETS, E. 2009. What is a genus in
Cypereae: phytogeny, character homology assessment and gener-
ic circumscription in Cypereae. Botanical Review 75: 52-66.
PODLECH, D. 1960. Ubereinige Cyperaceen Sudafrikas. Mitteilungen
der Botanischen Staatssammlung Miinchen 3: 521-530.
PODLECH, D. 1967. Cyperaceae. In H. Merxmuller, Prodromus einer
Flora von Siidwestafrika 165. Cramer, Lehre.
SCHONLAND, S. 1922. Introduction to South African Cyperaceae.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 3. Govern-
ment Printer, Pretoria.
STEUDEL, E.G. 1855. Synopsis plantarum glumacearum 2. Cyper-
aceae. Metzler, Stuttgart.
VORSTER, P.J. 1978. Revision of the taxonomy o/Mariscus Vahl and
related genera in southern Africa. D.Sc. thesis, University of
Pretoria.
VORSTER, P.J. 1981. The identity and typification of Mariscus dregea-
nus. Bothalia 13: 444—446.
C. ARCHER* and P. GOETGHEBEUR**
* South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , 000 1
Pretoria. E-mail: c.archer@sanbi.org.za.
** Department of Biology, Research Group Spermatophytes, Ghent
University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
MS. received: 2011-04-20.
SCROPHULARIACEAE
ANTICHARIS JUNCEA, AN OVERLOOKED RECORD FOR SOUTH AFRICA, WITH NOTES ON ITS TYPE LOCALITIES AND
FLOWER MORPHOLOGY
The genus Anticharis Endl. consists of± 10 species in
Africa, Arabia and India, six of which are known from
the Flora of southern Africa region (Smithies 2000).
The plants are small, erect or suberect perennials (rarely
annuals), sometimes suffruticose herbs or dwarf shrubs,
glabrous to glandular-pubescent with alternate, entire
leaves. The purple corolla tube is elongated and broad
with a wide open, usually white throat. Anticharis is eas-
ily distinguished from the genera Aptosimum Burch, ex
Benth. and Peliostomum E.Mey. ex Benth (all members
of tribe Aptosimeae) by having only two fertile stamens
and not four (Hiem 1904; Smithies 2000).
In recent floristic inventories only two species of
Anticharis , namely A. scoparia (E.Mey. ex Benth.)
Hiern ex Benth. & Hook.f. and A. senegalensis (Walp.)
Bhandari, are listed as occurring in South Africa (in
Northern Cape and in Northern Cape and Limpopo
respectively) (Smithies & Ready 2003; Smithies 2006).
302
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
A specimen of A.juncea L. Bolus (Steyn 1696), collected
during a field trip to the Northern Cape in August 2009,
was initially thought to be the first record of the species
for South Africa. Up to now A. juncea (= A. genistoides
Schinz) was considered in regional inventories as being
confined to Namibia (Smithies & Ready 2003). The
purpose of this contribution is to report on the floristic
significance of this find, to provide clarity on the origi-
nal collecting localities of the species and to designate a
lectotype. The availability of live material also permits
a more complete morphological description of the flow-
ers, and we provide the first close-up images of the fresh
flowers to be published for the species.
An investigation into the localities of the specimens
of Anticharis juncea housed in PRE and NBG proved
informative. These collections are incorporated in the
National Herbarium’s Pretoria (PRE) Computerised
Information System (PRECIS), a mega-database used,
amongst others, to produce checklists of the South Afri-
can flora and to plan itineraries of collecting trips. Most
collections of A. juncea are from the Warmbad District
(Namibia) but the protologue of A. juncea cites three
syntypes, Pearson 3609 and 3600 from Bushmanland
and Pearson 4002 from Great Namaqualand, south of
Warmbad, Namibia (Brown et al. 1915). The specimens
from Bushmanland were collected near a place called
Wortel in January 1909. There are a number of refer-
ences to a place with the name of Wortel. These range
from the Rehoboth area (Bethanie District) of Namibia
in the north to Gamoep further south in the Namaqua-
land part of the Northern Cape of South Africa. A close
look at Pearson’s itinerary reveals that he was collecting
in Bushmanland (South Africa) during December 1908
and January 1909. Only in late January 1909 did he start
collecting in the Bethanie District, Namibia. It is very
likely that Pearson’s specimens from Bushmanland were
collected near the Farm Wortel (2918BB), northwest of
Pella, South Africa. Pearson was therefore not only the
first botanist to have discovered A. juncea , but also the
first to have collected herbarium material of this species
in South Africa, a record which has hitherto not been
reflected by floristic inventories.
FIGURE 9. — Anticharis juncea ,
close-up of corolla, A, side
view; B. view from below.
Scale bars: 5 mm. Photo-
graphs: M. Koekemoer.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
303
Anticharis juncea is a glabrous, perennial shrublet
up to 300 mm high, with striate stems that are almost
leafless to distantly leafy, with alternate, narrow, linear
leaves, 2-5 * 1 mm. The flowers are axillary, solitary,
tubular and carried on a bi-bracteolate pedicel, 2-4 mm
long. The corolla tube is 18-21 mm long, purple, nar-
row at the base and dilated distally, with two shallow,
lateral pouches (or pockets) near the base, a prominent,
dorsal pouch towards the distal end, a marked diagonal
constriction, best seen from the side, and a longitudi-
nal. ventral groove in the proximal half (Figure 9A, B).
These floral features are clearly visible in live mate-
rial but are obscured when the flowers are pressed and
dried, although the presence of pouches can be vaguely
discerned. The two fertile anterior stamens are inserted
above the base of the corolla and extend a little beyond
the middle of the corolla tube. The capsule is ovate,
bisulcate with an acute apex and dehisces mainly sep-
ticidally but also loculicidally. Although the specific
pollinator(s) of A. juncea is unknown, there is a marked
and widespread association between pollen wasps
(Vespidae: Masarinae) and the members of the Scrophu-
lariaceae tribe Aptosimeae (Benth.) Benth. & Hook.f.,
namely Aptosimum Burch, ex Benth.. Peliostomum
Benth. and Anticharis (Gess & Gess 2004. 2010).
Although it most closely resembles the mainly annual
Anticharis senegalensis, A. juncea differs from the
former in being perennial, glabrous, with fewer, smaller
leaves and shorter pedicels (Brown et al. 1915). The
three South African species may be distinguished using
the following key:
1 a Plants perennial or annual, glandular-pubescent:
2a Plants usually annual; leaves linear, 10-40 mm long; pedi-
cels 8-12 mm long A. senegalensis
2b Plants perennial; leaves linear-lanceolate, 4-13 mm long;
pedicel 3-8 mm long A. scoparia
lb Plants perennial, glabrous; distantly leaved, leaves linear,
2-5 mm long; pedicel 2-A mm long A. juncea
Anticharis senegalensis [= A. linearis (Benth.)
Hochst. ex Asch.] has a wide and markedly disjunct
transequatorial range, occurring in Limpopo and North-
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
FIGURE 10. — Known distribution of Anticharis juncea , •; A. scopa-
ria, I; and A. senegalensis , A.
em Cape in South Africa, Botswana, Namibia (Figure
10), also in Angola and Zimbabwe in the south, then fur-
ther north in arid parts of North Africa through Arabia to
India. The distribution of A. juncea, on the other hand, is
much more restricted, with all known records confined
to a small area in the extreme south of Namibia and
adjacent parts of the Northern Cape. It is usually found
on stony or rocky soils within the Succulent Karoo
Biome (Rutherford & Westfall 1968), or the Desert
Biome in South Africa and the bordering Nama-Karoo
Biome in Namibia (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). Bio-
geographically, A. juncea is endemic to the Gariep Cen-
tre of Endemism (Van Wyk & Smith 2001), in particu-
lar the very hot and arid, deeply dissected region along
the Lower Orange River Valley, downstream from the
Augrabies waterfalls. The distribution of A. juncea over-
laps with that of A. scoparia, also a perennial and Gariep
Centre endemic, but a species with a more northwesterly
range (Figure 10). A. scoparia is glandular-pubescent
with linear-oblong leaves (Hiem 1904).
Anticharis juncea is an example of a species that was
overlooked and left out of South African floristic check-
lists for more than 100 years since its first discovery,
because of the incorrect interpretation of the localities
in the protologue. Computerized herbarium specimens
offer improved access to large quantities of data as well
as expanded analytical potential (Rhoads & Thomp-
son 1992). However, to be analysed spatially, botanical
data must have locality information that can be related
to a point on a map. It is very important that the locality
information should be related to the correct point on a
map.
Anticharis juncea L. Bolus in N.E.Br., L. Bolus &
E. Phillips in Annals of the South African Museum 9,4:
263, 264 (1915). Type: Northern Cape, 2918 (Gamoep):
Bushmanland, Wortel, pass near base of kopje (-BB),
10 Jan. 1909, Pearson 3600 (BOL, scan!, Iecto., desig-
nated here).
Note : all three syntypes mentioned in the protologue
are mounted together on the same sheet in BOL where
Louisa Bolus worked. The three collections are, however,
clearly delineated by pencil lines and each has its own
label. The syntype Pearson 3600 is considered the bet-
ter specimen and is chosen here as lectotype. There are
two sheets of the syntype Pearson 3609 in NBG [marked
I and II]. Sheet II represents Anticharis juncea and
although it carries the number 3609 , is rather confusingly
numbered and apparently contains material from two dif-
ferent collections. On one of the two specimens mounted
on this sheet is a field note with the number 5413. At a
later stage, someone has written 4002 on it. this number
being that of the third Pearson syntype.
Other specimens seen
NAMIBIA. — 2818 (Warmbad): Great Namaqualand [southern
Namibia], kopje south of Warmbad, (-CD), 27 Jan. 1909, Pearson
4002 (BOL, scan!); Goodhouse Poort, (-CD), 22 June 1989, Van Wyk
8639 (PRE). 2819 (Ariamsvlei): Warmbad Dist., 16 miles [25.6 km]
SSW of Charly’s Puts, Geinab Gorge, (-BA), 17 May 1955, Acocks
18173 (PRE); Warmbad Dist., Farm Vellorsdrift: WAR 93, Granitberge
am Oranje bei Brucke, (-CB), 17 May 1963, Giess, Volk & Bleiss-
ner 7051 (PRE); Warmbad, ± 1 km NW of Orange River along road
between Onseepkans and Karasburg, (-CB), 1 Feb. 1974, Davidse de
Loxton 6197 (PRE).
304
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2918 (Gamoep): ridge E of Goodhouse
turn-off en route to Klein Pella, (-BA), 23 Aug. 2009, Steyn 1696
(PRE); Bushmanland, near Wortel, (-BB), 10 Jan. 1909, Pearson 3609
(BOL, scan!; NBG Sheet I, scan!).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank colleagues for helpful
comments and suggestions. My sincere thanks to Prof.
Braam van Wyk who greatly improved the manuscript.
Grateful thanks to Terry Trinder-Smith and Edwina
Marais for help in locating herbarium specimens in BOL
and NBG, respectively. A collecting permit was provided
by Northern Cape Nature Conservation.
REFERENCES
BROWN, N.E., BOLUS, L. & PHILLIPS. E.P. 1915. Scrophulariaceae.
Annals of the South African Museum 9,4: 263, 264.
GESS, S.K. & GESS, F.W. 2004. Distributions of flower associations of
pollen wasps (Vespidae: Masarinae) in southern Africa. Journal
of Arid Environments 57: 17-44.
GESS, S.K. & GESS, F.W. 2010. Pollen wasps and flowers in southern
Africa. SANBI Biodiversity Series 18. South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
HIERN. W.P. 1904. Scrophulariaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 4,2: 121—420. Reeve, London.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
RHOADS, A.F. & THOMPSON, L. 1992. Integrating herbarium data
into a geographic information system: requirements for spatial
analysis. Taxon 41 : 43—4-9.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization. Botanical Research Insti-
tute, Pretoria.
SMITHIES, S.J. 2000. Scrophulariaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants
of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 508-537.
SMITHIES, S..I. 2006. Scrophulariaceae. In G. Germishuizen, N.L.
Meyer, Y. Steenkamp & M. Keith, A checklist of South African
plants. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report
No. 41. SABONET, Pretoria.
SMITHIES, S.J. & READY, J.A. 2003. Anticharis. In G. Germishuizen
& N.L. Meyer, Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist.
Strelitzia 14: 863. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
VAN WYK, A.E. & SMITH, G.F. 200 1 . Regions offloristic endemism in
southern Africa. A review with emphasis on succulents. Untdaus
Press, Hatfield, Pretoria.
H.M. STEYN*
* National Herbarium, South African National Botanical Institute, Pri-
vate Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2010-09-07.
ASTERACEAE
LACHNOSPERMUM NEGLECTUM (ASTEROIDEAE: GNAPHALIEAE), ANEW AND OVERLOOKED SPECIES FROM THE
WORCESTER VALLEY, WESTERN CAPE
Lachnospermum Willd., a small genus in the Meta-
lasia group of tribe Gnaphalieae, is distinguished by its
solitary or few, relatively large, campanulate capitula;
multicellular hairs on the outside (abaxial) surface of the
corolla lobes; long, unicellular hairs on the cypselas; and
a rim or shallow cup at the top of the cypsela surround-
ing the pappus (Hilliard & Burtt 1981; Ward et al. 2009).
It currently comprises three named species (Koekemoer
2002), although a fourth unnamed species was included
by Goldblatt & Manning (2000) in their enumeration of
the genus as L. sp. 1 . Vegetatively similar to L. fascicula-
tum (Thunb.) Baill., this taxon had been identified by the
German botanist Rudolf Schlechter as a distinct species
under the manuscript name L. neglectum , based on a col-
lection of his from Brandvlei near Worcester made in the
late nineteenth century. Schlechter was familiar with both
species, having collected true L. fasciculatum a short dis-
tance further up the Breede River Valley just four years
earlier, but the superficial similarity between the taxa led
most botanists to identify both as L. fasciculatum , with
the signal exception of British botanist N.E. Brown. The
earliest collection of the Brandvlei taxon appears to have
been made by W. Tyson in the Hex River Valley in 1881,
and an indication that N.E. Brown concurred with Sch-
lechter in considering it to represent a novelty, is borne
out by an annotation on the duplicate at the Bolus Her-
barium to this effect by Cape Town botanist Harry Bolus,
dated lOJanuary 1903.
The Brandvlei taxon has now been collected from
multiple different populations in the Worcester and Hex
River Valleys. Although vegetatively similar to Lachno-
spermum fasciculatum , these populations differ consist-
ently from that species in several features, notably the
size and shape of the capitula, the colour and disposition
of the involucral bracts, and the size of the florets. We
follow Schlechter in treating them as a distinct species
under his epithet neglectum , which is now even more
apposite than it was at the time that he suggested it.
Specimens from BOL, NBG, PRE and SAM, the main
herbaria with good representation of Cape species, were
consulted for records of the two new species (herbarium
acronyms after Holmgren et al. 1990). The Aluka website
(www.aluka.org) was searched for duplicates of the Sch-
lechter collection of Lachnospermum neglectum.
Lachnospermum neglectum Schltr. ex J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt, sp. nov.
Lachnospermum fasciculato (Thunb.) Baill. habitu
suffruticoso intricate ramoso similis sed capitulis late
cylindricis, 7-9 x 6-8 mm, paleis ± 10 subulato-pilosis,
phyllariis ± 100 in seriebus ± 12 imbricatis extends 1-2
mm longis intends 6. 0-7.0 x 1.5 mm oblongis margini-
bus membranaceis distaliter dense coactis in laminam
attenuatam subulatam deflexam stramineam 0. 5-2.0 mm
longam contractis, flosculis flavis ±5.5 mm longis, et
cupula apical i ovarii cypselarumque symmetrica differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3118 (Worcester): ‘in colli-
bus aridis prope Brand Vlei’ [Brandvlei], (-CB), 9 Jan.
1896, Schlechter 9934 [K, holo.; BOL, HBG, PRE (2
sheets), S, Z, iso.].
Intricately branched shrublet, 400-800 mm high;
branches often spreading horizontally, densely whitish
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
305
or yellowish tomentose with matted hairs, ± sparsely
leafy. Leaves ericoid, spreading or declinate, with
rosette-like axillary fascicles ± half as long, to as long
as subtending leaf, involute, narrowly lanceolate-eri-
coid, 2. 0-2. 5 x 1 mm. acute or apiculate, mostly ± half
twisted, adaxial surface felted, abaxial surface arach-
nose. Capitula discoid, 7-9 x 6-8 mm, terminal on pri-
mary and secondary branches, solitary or up to three in
umbellate clusters, ± 20-flowered. Involucre broadly
campanulate, 7-9 x 6-8 mm; bracts ± 100 in ± 12 imbri-
cating series, progressively longer acropetally, outermost
1-2 mm long, innermost 6. 0-7.0 x 1.5 mm, oblong with
cartilaginous stereome and membranous margins, gla-
brous in basal half but densely felted in distal half with
cohering, white hairs, tapering into an attenuate, sharply
deflexed. brown-papery, awl-like lamina 0. 5-2.0 mm
long. Receptacle paleate; paleae ± 10, setaceous, ± 6 mm
long, sparsely villous distally. Florets yellow, ± 5.5 mm
long; lower part of tube cylindrical. 3 mm long, limb
narrowly campanulate, 5-lobed. lobes lanceolate, ± erect
and not spreading, ± 1 mm long with thickened margins,
ciliate along inner margin and penicillate apically with
sparse gland-tipped hairs on abaxial surface. Anthers
2.5 mm long including ovate apical appendage, base
tailed. Ovary cylindrical with shallow, fimbriate crown,
6-winged, wing ribs densely pubescent; style terete with
swollen base on distinct stylopodium, branching just
below mouth of tube, branches ± 1 mm long, lateral
margins stigmatic, apices truncate, penicillate. Cypsela
cylindric with six longitudinal ribs or wings and shallow
8-10-lobed crown, 3. 0-3. 5 x 1.5 mm. ribs asymmetri-
cally disposed, with one median rib on inner face and
five ribs congested on outer face, ribs densely villous
along ridges with long, eglandular hairs in several rows
plus scattered gland-tipped hairs, crown fimbriate and
adpressed scabridulous, pale straw-coloured. Pappus
bristles ± 80, connate basally and also shortly fused into
fascicles, ± 4.5 mm long, barbellate with apical barbs
longer. Flowering time'. Jan.-Feb. Figures 1 1 A-I; 12.
Distribution and ecology'. Lachnospermum neglec-
tum is confined to the upper Breede River Valley and its
tributaries, where it has been collected from around De
Dooms in the Hex River Valley and between Worcester
and Robertson in the Breede River Valley itself, extend-
ing onto the lower northern slopes of Jonaskop at the
western end of the Riviersonderend Mtns (Figure 13).
Plants are recorded as locally common in transitional
renosterveld-fynbos on sandstone alluvium and on sandy
flats, from 200-600 m, or on lower sandstone slopes.
Several other ericoid shrubs are narrow endemics of
the Worcester Valley, notably Euchaetis pungens (Ruta-
ceae), Polhillia obsoleta (Fabaceae) and Leucadendron
flexuosum (Proteaceae).
Diagnosis and relationships'. Lachnospermum neglec-
tum. like L. fasciculatum, is a well-branched, moderately
densely leafy shrublet, with small, ericoid leaves devel-
oping rosette-like axillary brachyblasts, and bearing
1-3 capitula per branch. The brown, scale-like limbs to
the involucral bracts set them apart from the remaining
two species, L. imbricatum (P.J.Bergius) Hilliard and L.
umbellatum (L.f.) Pillans, both of which have conspicu-
ously petaloid, white or pink bracts.
Lachnospermum neglectum is distinguished from L.
fasciculatum by its mostly markedly horizontal branches
and generally smaller involucres, 7-9 x 6-8 mm, obtuse
at the base, and by the sharply deflexed. pale straw-col-
oured, attenuate and awl-like, papery limbs to the bracts.
In L. fasciculatum the branches are mostly ± ascend-
ing and the capitula are larger, 10-15 x 8-11 mm, and
obconic at the base (Figure 1 1 J ), and the involucral
bracts have smaller, erect or suberect, scale-like, acute
or acuminate limbs that are chestnut-brown or plum-red.
The florets in L. neglectum are also substantially smaller
than in L. fasciculatum, ±5.5 mm long vs 7-9 mm long
(Figure 1 IK), and the apical cup on the ovary and cypse-
las is symmetrically developed on all sides vs asymmet-
rical and reduced to a rim on one side in L. fasciculatum
(Figure 11L; see also Koekemoer 2002: plate 31.1, fig.
14).
The two species are geographic vicariants, with Lach-
nospermum fasciculatum more widely spread through
the southwestern Cape. Considered until recently to be
endemic to the Cape Floristic Region, with its northern-
most station in the Pakhuis Mtns (Goldblatt & Manning
2000; Koekemoer 2002), L. fasciculatum has now been
collected north of the Olifants River at Brand se Baai on
the southern Namaqualand coast. From here it ranges
through the Cedarberg and Cold Bokkeveld to Vil-
liersdorp and Greyton at the southern foot of the Rivier-
sonderend Mtns (Figure 13), extending onto the West
Coast and the Cape Flats, from Mamre to Kuils River.
It is largely absent inland of the coastal ranges, except
at the head of the Breede River Valley, where it has been
collected from the foot of the Waaihoek Mtns. This sta-
tion is just 30 km northwest of the most northerly of the
known populations of L. neglectum.
Additional specimens examined
Lachnospermum neglectum
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): in clivis montis Hex River
Valley, 1500' [450 m], (-BC), Jan. 1881, Tyson 786 (SAM); in con-
valle Hex River, prope De Dooms, (-BC), Jan. 1908, H. Bolus 13125
(BOL); Sandberg Hills on Skerpenheuvel Road, 300-600 m, (-DA),
28 Oct. 1982, Forrester & Bayer 237 (NBG); Jonaskop, roadside to
FM tower, (-DC), 14 Jan. 1979, Boucher 4247 (PRE); Jonaskop.
second gate from bottom, 600 m, (-DC), 9 Feb. 1981, Boucher 5006
(NBG); base of Sencor road, N side of Jonaskop, 30 Jan. 2004, Bergh
1105 (NBG); 7 km SW of Robertson, S side of Sandberg, (-DD), 31
Jan. 2007, Helme 4562 (NBG).
Lachnospermum fasciculatum
WESTERN CAPE. — 3117 (Lepelfontein): Brand se Baai, Harte-
beeste Kom, 74 m, (-BD), 26 Mar. 2003 [fr.], Desmet & Helme 3434
(NBG). 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 11.2 km S of Redelinghuys, (-DA), 7
June 1970, Acocks 24271 (PRE); between turn-off to Papkuilsfontein and
Brakvlei, (-DD), 20 Mar. 1996, Koekemoer 1217 (PRE). 3218 (Clanwil-
liam): rocky slopes west of Clanwilliam on road to Graafwater, (-BB),
6 Oct. 2004 [fr.], Goldblatt & Porter 12633 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal):
northern Cedarberg, Ribboksvlei Farm, N of Kliphuis Peak, ± 920 m,
(-AA), 14 Feb. 1984, Taylor 10913 (NBG, PRE); Pakhuisvlakte at top
of pass, ± 900 m, (-AA), 14 Jan. 1986, Taylor 11468 (NBG, PRE); 17
km from Clanwilliam on road to Pakhuis, (-AA), 25 Aug. 1995, Rod-
riguez-Oubina & Cruces 2076 (PRE); foot of Pakhuis Pass on E side,
(-AA), 21 Mar. 1996, Koekemoer 1220 (PRE); near Algeria Forest Sta-
tion, Mar. 1940, Stokoe 56987 (SAM); 1 km N of Algeria Forest Sta-
tion on Nieuwoudt’s Pass, ± 517 m, (-AC), 27 Apr. 1981, Le Maitre
196 (NBG. PRE); Algeria, (-AC), 14 Feb. 1936, Compton 6186 (NBG);
Op-de-Berg, Tuiskloof Farm, 756 m, (-CA), 8 Jan. 2003, Botha (3)012
(NBG); along R303 between Op-de-Berg and Citrusdal, (-CA), 11 Feb.
2007, Koekemoer 3483 (PRE); Citrusdal, Allendal Farm, Grysboknek,
306
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
FIGURE 1 1. — Lachnospermum negleclum: A-H, Boucher 5006. A, capitulum; B, involucral bracts (outermost on left and innermost on right); C,
palea; D, floret, side view; E, anther; F, stigma; G, cypsela (inner face, pappus removed); H, cypsela (outer face). 1, primary leaves (left Tyson
5877, right Helme 4562). L. fasciculalum, .l-L, Hanekom 3381 : J, capitulum; K, floret, side view; L, cypsela (side view, pappus removed).
Scale bar: A-C, J, 2 mm; D, G, H, 1, K, L, 1 mm; E, F. 0.5 mm. Artist: J.C. Manning.
800 m, (-CA), 23 Mar. 2002, Hanekom 3381 (NBG, PRE); 23 miles [37
km] N of Grootriver turn-off on road from Ceres to Citrusdal, (-CA),
8 Mar. 1966, Taylor 6755 (NBG); Kromrivier, on path to Disa Pools,
(-CB), 12 Mar. 2003, Koekemoer 2686 (PRE); La Fontein, (-CC), 10
Feb. 1978, Boucher 3655 (NBG, PRE). 3318 (Cape Town): sand flats
NE of Blaauberg, (-CD), Jan. 1927, Pillans 6822 (BOL); Malmesbury
Road, (-DA), 9 Mar. 1973, Montgomery 381 (NBG); Malmesbury Dist.,
Burgers Post Farm near Pella, 200 m, (-DA), 15 Mar. 1979, Boucher &
Shepherd 4269 (NBG, PRE), 17 Jan. 1980, Boucher & Shepherd 4929
(NBG, PRE); Kuils River, (-DC), II Mar. 1933, Levyns 4251 (BOL);
Klapmuts, (-DD), 9 Mar. 1959, Barker 8863 (NBG); ± 3 km E of Pniel,
Farm Normandy, 300 m, (-DD), 5 Apr. 2004, Helme 2986 (NBG); Bol-
Bothalia 4 1 ,2 (2011)
307
FIGURE 12. — Lachnospermum neg-
lectum, Schlechter9934 (holo-
type). Digital image courtesy
of Aluka website (www.aluka.
org).
telary, (-DD), 18 Jan. 1941, Compton 10380 (NBG). 3319 (Worcester):
Ceres, slopes of Elandskloof, (-AC), 5 Apr. 1952, Levyns 9834 (BOL);
25 km N of Wellington, Elandsberg Nature Reserve, (-AC), 12 Nov.
1986, De Villiers 40 (NBG, PRE); ‘in planitie ad pedem montis Mosterts-
berg’, (-AC), 30 Jan. 1 892, Schlechter 857 (BOL); Romans River Nature
16” IF 20“ 22“ 24” 26' 2»
FIGURE 13. — Known distribution of Lachnospermum neglectum, O;
and L. fasciculatnm, •.
Reserve, (-AC), 4 Feb. 1981, Nilsson 133 (PRE); Zachariaskloof Catch-
ment, ± 1100' [366 m], (-CC), 20 Feb. 1970, Haynes 293 (NBG, PRE);
Franschhoek Pass on Villiersdorp side, (-CC), 26 Feb. 1948, Compton
20472 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): near bridge over River Zonder Einde
[Riviersonderend], between Viljoen’s Pass and Villiersdorp, (-AB), Mar.
1933, L. Bolus 21492 (BOL); near Genadendal, (-BA), 3 Mar. 1935, Lev-
yns 4864 (BOL); E of Greyton west of Gobos River, 220 m, (-BA), 23
Feb. 2006, Helme 3899 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the curators of the relevant herbaria for
allowing access to their collections, H.P. Linder for con-
firming the existence of isotype material of L. neglectum
in the Zurich Herbarium, and B. Nordenstam for oblig-
ing us in the same way for Stockholm.
REFERENCES
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2000. Cape plants. A conspectus
of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical
Institute, Cape Town & Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
308
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1981. Some generic concepts in
Compositae-Gnaphaliinae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 82: 181-232.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum. Part 1 : The herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
KOEKEMOER, M. 2002. Systematics of the Metalasia group in the
Relhaniinae (Asteraceae-Gnaphalieae). Unpublished Ph.D. the-
sis, Faculty of Science, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannes-
burg.
WARD, J„ BAYER, R.J., BRE1TWEISER, I., SM1SSEN, R„ GALBA-
NY-CASALS, M. & UNWIN, M. 2009. Gnaphalieae. In V.A.
Funk, A. Susanna, T.F. Stuessy & R.J. Bayer, Systematics, evolu-
tion, and biogeographv of Compositae: 539-588. International
Association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2010-06-03.
AMARYLLIDACEAE
AMMOCHAR1S DESERTICOLA (AMARYLLIDEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM NAMIBIA AND A KEY TO SPECIES OF THE GENUS
Ammocharis Herb, is a small, sub-Saharan genus in
the family Amaryllidaceae. When last revised in 1939
the genus included five species (Milne-Redhead & Sch-
weickerdt 1939). More recently, phylogenetic analy-
ses using nuclear and limited plastid non-coding DNA
sequences (Meerow et al. 2003; Kwembeya et al. 2007)
have supported the taxonomic reassessments of two
anomalous species from genera closely related to Ammo-
charis (Lehmiller 1992; Snijman & Williamson 1994):
Cybistetes longifolia (L.) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. was
reinstated in Ammocharis and Crinum nerinoides Baker
was transferred to Ammocharis (Snijman & Archer
2003). In addition, Nordal (1982) reduced A. heterostyla
(Bullock) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. to synonymy in A.
angolensis (Baker) Milne-Redh. & Schweick.
The genus is most closely allied to Crinum L. from
which it is distinguished by leaves that, unlike those
of Crinum , are not obviously sheathing at the base and
have an intercalary meristem allowing the base of a leaf
to continue developing intermittently over several grow-
ing seasons. Due to this pattern of regrowth after a leaf
has died back, the mature leaves characteristically have
truncate tips. In addition, the leaves are biflabellately
arranged and most often have flat blades. Ammocharis ,
like all taxa in the tribe Amaryllideae, has fleshy, recal-
citrant seeds which fail to become dry and dormant
before germinating. In contrast to the other genera,
however, Ammocharis has two modes of seed dispersal.
Most commonly the seeds are dispersed by means of the
fleshy fruits being released individually from the fruiting
head in close proximity to the mother plant. A. longifo-
lia, which occupies the extreme western parts of winter
rainfall southern Africa, is exceptional in having a wind-
dispersed infructescence. The entire fruiting head rapidly
dries off and is shed as a single unit that is dispersed by
rolling away in the wind.
The genus comprises two widespread species, Ammo-
charis coranica (Ker Gawl.) Herb, which occurs in sea-
sonally damp areas throughout the summer rainfall area
of southern Africa (Milne-Redhead & Schweickerdt
1939), and A. tinneana (Kotschy & Peyr.) Milne-Redh.
& Schweick., which inhabits grassland or wooded grass-
land, extends from Ethiopia southwards to Botswana and
northern Namibia (Nordal 1982). Other species, which
have relatively restricted distribution ranges, occupy
more specific habitats within the landscape: flood plains
of rivers [A. baumii (Harms) Milne-Redh. & Schweick.]
and limestone pans (A. nerinoides). Namibia has all but
one species of Ammocharis within its borders, whereas
other countries have two species at most.
While on a botanical expedition in the extremely arid
Namib Naukluft Park in late February 2006, Namibian
botanist Dr Patricia Craven photographed flowering
plants of an unknown species that has leaves like Ammo-
charis coranica and A. longifolia but exceptionally long
flowers. Four years later, flowering and fruiting plants
were collected in the same region. The infructescences
were remarkable in being dry, with widely radiating,
straight pedicels, a condition previously known only
in A. longifolia. Following exceptionally good summer
rains in 2011, additional collections of this taxon were
made, allowing a more thorough study of the plants. The
strap-shaped leaves, with truncate tips characteristic of
an intercalary meristem, the unusually long flowers and
the dry infructescences indicate clearly that these newly
discovered Namibian plants are an undescribed spe-
cies of Ammocharis , closely related to A. longifolia. We
describe this new species here as A. deserticola and pro-
vide a key to identify the seven species currently recog-
nized in Ammocharis.
Ammocharis deserticola Snijman & Kolberg, sp.
nov.
Bulbus ± ovatus, tunicatus, 80-110 mm latus,
supeme conspicue attenuatus, collum ± 80 x 25-35
mm. Folia 6-8, disticha, biflabellatim disposita, paten-
tia vel adpressa, ligulata 7-250 x 8-30 mm, vetustiora
apice truncata. Scapus compressus, ad 210 * 12-18 mm.
Umbella 11 -25-flora. Pedicelli 30-60 x 3—4 mm, trans-
verse ± trigoni, sub fructu valde elongati, rigidi et radi-
antes. Flores actinomorphi, tubaeformes, rosei; perigonii
tubus cylindricus, rectus, 50-90 mm longus; segmenta
oblanceolata, 70- 80 x 8-12 mm, patentes, recurvi ver-
sus apicem; stamina e perigonii tubo valde exserta; filam-
enta actinomorpha, 53-60 mm longa; antherae oblongae,
curvatae, 5><1.5 mm, pallidae; ovarium obtuse 3-angu-
latum, 10-15 mm longum; stylus filiformis, exsertus;
stigma integrum. Capsula indehiscens, obovoidea, 20-40
x 15-45 mm, valde 6-costata, rostrata; rostrum 14-50
mm longum. Semina camosa, subglobosa, ± 15 mm lata,
pallida.
TYPE. — Namibia, 2215 (Trekkopje): Erongo region,
Namib Naukluft Park, 5 km N of Langer Heinrich mine
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
309
on track towards Swakop River, 565 m, (-CD), 17 Feb.
2011, H. Kolberg & T. Tholkes HK2998 (WIND, holo.,
NBG, iso.).
Deciduous bulbous herb, 200-350 mm tall when
flowering. Bulb solitary, hypogeal, ± ovate, 80-110 mm
diam., extended into a neck, ± 80 x 25-35 mm, outer
tunics brown to tan-coloured, with darker brown longi-
tudinal veins, leathery to somewhat brittle, inner tunics
cream-coloured, with tan longitudinal veins. Leaves 6-8,
green at flowering, in 2 opposite spreading fans, laxly
spreading, later becoming prostrate, some curved side-
ways at base, strap-shaped, 7-250 x 8-30 mm, plane,
glaucous-green, glabrous; margin pale, smooth; apex of
mature leaves dying back as if cut across. Inflorescence
1 or rarely 2 mature at once, laxly 1 1-25-flowered,
umbel-like, ± 250 mm diam.; scape erect, longitudinally
compressed, up to 210 x 12-18 mm, green sometimes
flushed pink near base or apex; spathe valves 2, oblong-
lanceolate, up to 50-80 x ± 20 mm, soon reflexed and
dry; bracteoles filiform, ± 35 mm long. Flowers erect in
bud, soon spreading; pedicels erect at first, soon spread-
ing, 30-60 x 3^1 mm, trigonous in cross section, green;
perigone trumpet-shaped, actinomorphic, dark pink,
with paler pink tube, backed with narrow, brownish pink
median stripes on segments, faintly scented; tube cylin-
drical, straight, 50-90 mm long, widening slightly up to
5 mm at throat, firm; segments oblanceolate, 70- 80 x
8-12 mm, recurved distally, mucronate on tip. Stamens
inserted in throat, ± evenly spreading; filaments 53-60
mm long, 3 inner ± 2/3 as long as tepals, 3 outer ± as
long as tepals, ± inwardly curved, pink; anthers dorsi-
fixed, oblong, ± curved, 5.0 x ].5 mm, cream-coloured;
pollen cream-coloured. Ovary ± trigonous in cross sec-
tion, 10-15 mm long, scarcely wider than pedicels and
perigone tube, green, style filiform, reaching 10-15 mm
beyond outer stamens, pink, stigma small, undivided,
minutely penicillate. Infructescence dry; pedicels widely
radiating, straight, thickened, 50-130 x 5-8 mm; cap-
sule indehiscent, obovoid, 20^40 x 15-45 mm, strongly
6-ribbed, with thin, papery walls disintegrating irregu-
larly, with stout, apical beak, 14-50 mm long. Seeds few,
subglobose, ± 1 5 mm diam., fleshy, with a thin, pale,
corky covering. Flowering time : mid-February to early
March. Figures 14, 15.
Distribution and ecology. Ammocharis deserticola is
currently recorded only from the Namib Naukluft Park,
in the central Namib, Namibia (Figure 16). The species
occurs along well-drained, sandy rivulets and in grav-
elly soil on the northern slopes of undulating hills, often
benefiting from fog that drifts inland from the coast. The
surrounding vegetation is sparse and comprises spe-
cies of Stipagrostis (Poaceae), Adenolobus pechuelii
(Fabaceae) and Tetraena stapjfli (Zygophyllaceae).
Rainfall occurs in the summer months with an annual
FIGURE 14. — Habitat and habit of Ammocharis deserticola. A, typical, open habitat in the Namib Naukluft Park, Namibia, between low hills in
gravelly soil; B, plant in bud showing leaves with truncate leaf tips; C, flowering plant showing distinctive, long perigone tube; D, fruiting
plant showing dry infructescence. Photographs by H. Kolberg.
310
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
FIGURE 15. — Ammocharis deserticola. A, dried bulb cut in half lengthwise with pressed leaves and pressed inflorescence; B, pressed infructes-
cence cut in half lengthwise. Voucher specimen: H. Kolberg & T. Tholkes HK2998 (NBG). Scale bars: A, B = 100 mm.
average of 50-100 mm, but it is highly erratic and com-
pletely rainless years are not uncommon. Minimum tem-
peratures on average are 9-1 0°C, whereas they reach an
average of 32-33°C in the summer months (Mendelsohn
et al. 2002). At the type locality, between 300 and 400
plants were visible in February 2011, whereas at two
other localities in the same quarter-degree grid, an esti-
mated 100 to 150 plants were seen. Two populations,
including the one at the type locality, occur near the
Langer Heinrich uranium mine, but are afforded protec-
tion by falling within a national park. The third popula-
tion of up to 100 plants, however, falls within the mine’s
operational area and the plants there will be endangered.
Plans are under way to rescue these and use them in the
restoration of mine sites. There are unconfirmed reports
of this species occurring also in the quarter-degree grids
23 1 5CA and 25 1 5DA.
Diagnostic features and relationships : Ammocharis
deserticola is easily identified by a combination of floral
and fruiting features. The flowers have a characteristi-
cally long perigone tube (50-90 mm) with broad, lan-
ceolate, perigone segments. The infructescence is dry at
maturity and has stout pedicels that radiate ‘spoke-wise’
from their attachment with the scape. Each pedicel car-
ries a dry, heavily 6-ribbed capsule which is topped with
a stout, 14-50 mm long, apical beak. The thin, papery
walls of the capsules break open irregularly, often allow-
ing the extremely large seeds to drop to the ground
before the infructescence is rolled away in the wind.
The relatively broad perigone segments and specialized
infructescence which are shared with A. longifolia sug-
gest a close alliance with that species. In A. deserticola ,
however, the perigone tube is more than twice as long as
that of A. longifolia (50-90 vs 8-15 mm long).
FIGURE 16. — Known distribution of Ammocharis deserticola , ▲; and
A. longifolia , •.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
311
More than 600 km separate the populations of Ammo-
charis deserticola from the closest known populations of
A. longifolia in the Sperrgebiet, southern Namibia. Else-
where, A. longifolia is found in South Africa, extending
southwards from the sand plains of the Richtersveld.
through the Namaqualand lowlands to the sand flats of
the Cape Peninsula and Breede River Valley, Western
Cape (Figure 16). It is remarkable that such a showy
species as A. deserticola has been overlooked in the
past. This is probably the result of the bulbs not flow-
ering for long intervals until sufficient rain falls and
because their area of occupancy was largely inaccessible
to botanists prior to the mining activities in the central
Namib.
Other specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 2215 (Trekkopje): Erongo region. Namib Naukluft
Park, track west of Langer Heinrich mine towards Swakop River, 5 km
N of main mine road, 560 m, (-CD), 17 Mar. 2010, H. Kolberg & T.
Tholkes HK2915 (NBG, PRE, WIND); Erongo region, Namib Nauk-
luft Park, just W of entrance to Langer Heinrich mine, 625 m, (-CD),
17 Feb. 2011 . H. Kolberg & T. Tholkes HK2997 (NBG).
Key to species
la Leaves linear, straight, ± erect A. baumii
lb Leaves narrowly to broadly lorate, at least some falcate,
spreading on ground:
2a Flowers with style included in perigone tube A. angolensis
2b Flowers with style well-exserted from perigone throat:
3a Perigone segments with apex spirally recurved at anthe-
sis A. tinneana
3b Perigone segments recurved at anthesis but never spirally:
4a Pedicels not elongating after anthesis; infructescence
drooping on ground; fruit walls smooth, membranous:
5a Bulb 20-51 mm diam. at maturity; leaves 2 — 4(— 1 0)
mm wide; scape 2. 5-5.0 mm wide; flower head
60-130 mm diam A. nerinoides
5b Bulb 90-160 mm diam. at maturity; leaves (5— )25— 75
mm wide; scape 15-25 mm wide; flower head 1 50—
200 mm diam A. coranica
4b Pedicels lengthening after anthesis; infructescence
detaching at ground level; fruit walls papery, heavily
6-ribbed:
6a Perigone tube 8-15 mm long A. longifolia
6b Perigone tube 50-90 mm long A. deserticola
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Tyrone Tholkes who assisted in the
field, Patricia Craven for her images and Michelle Smith
for preparing the figures. The second author acknowl-
edges funding from the Millennium Seed Bank Partner-
ship, Kew and permission from the Namibian Ministry
of Environment and Tourism to collect plants.
REFERENCES
KWEMBEYA, E.G., BJORA, C.S., STEDJE, B. & NORDAL, I. 2007.
Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Crinum (Amaryllidace-
ae) with emphasis on tropical African species: evidence from
trnL-F and nuclear ITS DNA sequence data. Taxon 56: 801-810.
LEHMILLER, D.J. 1992. Transfer of Crinum nerinoides to Ammo-
charis (Amaryllidaceae). Novon 2: 33-35.
MEEROW, A.W., LEHMILLER, D.J. & CLAYTON, J.R. 2003. Phy-
togeny and biogeography of Crinum L. (Amaryllidaceae) inferred
from nuclear and limited plastid non-coding DNA sequences.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141 : 349-363.
MENDELSOHN. J„ JARVIS, A., ROBERTS, C. & ROBERTSON, T.
2002. Atlas of Namibia: a portrait of the land and its people.
Ministry of Environment and David Phillip Publishers, Cape
Town.
MILNE-REDHEAD. E. & SCH WEICKERDT, H.G. 1 939. A new con-
ception of the genus Ammocharis Herb. Journal of the Linnean
Society, Botany 52: 159-197.
NORDAL, I. 1982. Amaryllidaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropical
East Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & ARCHER, R.H. 2003. Amaryllidaceae. In G. Ger-
mishuizen & N.L. Meyer, Plants of southern Africa: an annotated
checklist. Strelitzia 14: 957-967 .
SNIJMAN, D.A. & WILLIAMSON, G. 1994. A taxonomic re-assess-
ment of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia (Amaryl-
lideae: Amaryllidaceae). Bothalia 24: 127-132.
D.A. SNIJMAN* and H. KOLBERG**
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Cape Town. Email: d.snijman@sanbi.org.za.
** Millennium Seed Bank Partnership, Namibia, c/o National Botani-
cal Research Institute, Private Bag 13184, Windhoek, Namibia. Email:
hertak@nbri.org.na.
MS. received: 2011-04-04.
ALLIACEAE
MICROMORPHOLOGY AND CYTOLOGY OF PROTOTULBAGHIA SIE BERTH. WITH NOTES ON ITS TAXONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE
Four genera of the Alliaceae are known to occur in
sub-Saharan Africa, in total comprising 35 indigenous
and two naturalized alien species (Table 2) (Archer 2003;
Klopper et al. 2006). Tnlbaghia L. is the most diverse
and widespread genus of the family in southern Africa,
but the other two indigenous sub-Saharan genera. Allium
L. and Prototulbaghia Vosa, are each represented by a
single restricted-range species, of which the latter has
only been described recently (Vosa 2007). This note sup-
plements the existing description of P. siebertii Vosa,
which is endemic to the Sekhukhuneland Centre of Ende-
mism (Van Wyk & Smith 2001 ), South Africa (Vosa et al.
2011), where it is restricted to the summit of the Leolo
Mountain Range, Limpopo Province. Although macro-
morphological characters of Prototulbaghia have been
documented by Siebert et al. (2008), little is known about
the micromorphology and cytology of P. siebertii.
Live material of Prototulbaghia siebertii was col-
lected from the wild in November 2005 and culti-
vated in clay pots in a mixture of compost, peat, sand
and garden soil. Plants were housed in a greenhouse at
TABLE 2. — Sub-Saharan genera of Alliaceae and no. species per genus
recorded for Flora of southern Afi-ica ( FSA ) (Archer 2003) and
tropical African flowering plants (EPFAT*) respectively (Klop-
per et al. 2006)
talien taxa; * Enumeration des plantes a fleurs d’Afrique tropicale.
312
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
A
FIGURE 1 7. — Prototulbaghia siebertii. A, micrograph of floral scape showing very small glandular hairs; B, photograph of peculiar hooked tips of
leaves. Plant grown from seed originally collected near Schoonoord, Leolo Mountains, Sekhukhuneland. Scale bars: A. 1 mm; B. 0.75 mm.
18 to 22°C. For mitotic preparations, actively growing
root tips were collected at about 1 1 : 00, pretreated in an
aqueous solution of 0.05 % colchicine for four hours at
greenhouse temperature and fixed overnight in 1 :3 gla-
cial acetic acid/absolute alcohol (Vosa 2000). After a
short hydrolysis in IN hydrochloric acid at 60°C, the
meristematic part of the tip was squashed in a drop of
1.5 % orcein in 45 % acetic acid and stained in Feulgen
for one hour (Vosa 2000). For an assessment of meio-
sis in pollen mother cells, anthers were removed from
young flower buds at an appropriate developmental
stage, before colouring of the perianth, and squashed in
1.5 % aceto-orcein (Vosa 1961) without pretreatment or
fixation on a microscope slide. The slide was left for six
hours and pressed between filter paper. The slide was
heated slightly over a flame, covered with a cover-slip
and sealed with paraffin wax (Vosa 1961). Micrographs
of the living material and of the cytological preparations
were taken with a digital camera.
Observations of the finer morphological features of
Prototulbaghia , both in living plants and herbarium
specimens have revealed four further diagnostic char-
acters of the inflorescence, leaves and anatomy. Most
conspicuous is the scape (or peduncle) which is red-
dish brown in the lower portion during its early stages
of development and is covered by short, whitish, glan-
dular hairs with somewhat recurved tips (Figure 17A).
The glandular hairs on the scape are easily rubbed off,
revealing underneath a single ridge of small translucent
teeth with their tips directed proximally (Figure 18A).
Under higher magnification (x 10), the surface of the
leaves is somewhat pruinose, especially distally, and
near the apex is a single row of tiny translucent, almost
glass-like teeth directed toward the apex. The row of
teeth forms a type of low central keel between two indis-
tinct keels on the abaxial surface as described by Vosa
(2007) (Figure 18B). The teeth on the distal part of the
leaves are easily rubbed off.
The minute teeth on the leaves and scape of Proto-
tulbaghia siebertii have not been recorded in any of the
species of Tulbagliia so far studied. In the allied genus
Allium, at least in section Molium, glandular hairs are
present both on the floral scape and on the leaves (Mann
1959). Flowever, many of the over 250 species of Allium
have not been examined for this character.
The spreading, shiny, dark green leaves of Prototul-
baghia siebertii have peculiar hooked apices (Figure
17B), which turn black in dried material. The apices
of emerging young leaves are slightly coiled outwards.
FIGURE 18. -Prototulbaghia siebertii. A, micrograph of floral scape showing ridge of tiny translucent teeth; B, micrograph of distal part of leaf
showing liny teeth directed towards apex of leaf. Scale bars: A, B. I mm.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
313
the coils relaxing as the leaf develops, but remaining
thickened and hook-like in mature leaves. Such hook-
like leaf apices have not previously been recorded for
the Alliaceae. Plants are easily uprooted when pass-
ing a hand or fingers through a clump, because of the
entangled hooked apices. We speculate that the hooked
leaves function as an additional mechanism of short
range vegetative dispersal (Vosa 2007). So far the only
other recorded instance of hooked leaf apices assisting
in dispersal of a plant is known for Junaea spectabilis
Kunth. (Arecaceae), the Chilean wine palm (C.G. Vosa
pers. obs. in the wild and in cultivation). In the case of
the palm, this unusual phenomenon has been observed in
the leaflets (pinnae) of the fronds in seedlings and fairly
young plants. This palm grows preferentially in soft for-
est soil, rich in peaty humus, and the hooked or coiled
leaflet apices aid in seedling dispersal when dragged
around by passing animals. This may also be the case in
Prototulbaghia , considering the muddy, wet, humus-rich
soils of its natural habitat.
The fourth micromorphological (anatomical) observa-
tion is a family characteristic. We can confirm the presence
of laticifers which on damage exude a clear watery liquid
in the leaf tissue of Prototulbaghia. Similar laticifers are
also present in Tulbaghia and Allium (Mahlberg 1993).
Prototulbaghia has a diploid chromosome comple-
ment of 2 n = 12. The karyotype is very similar to that
of Group 5 in Tulbaghia (Vosa 1975, 2000, 2009), sup-
porting the suggested close relationship between the two
genera. This poses the question how such an isolated
species, which is not polyploid, could have persisted
with such a presumably limited genetic endowment con-
sidering that polyploids are generally believed to display
increased genetic variability and evolutionary potential
(Hunziker& Schaal 1983).
A preliminary assessment of meiosis in Prototul-
baghia, based on 18 pollen mother cells at metaphase
1, has revealed six regular bivalents with an average
of about 20 chiasmata. Apart from the long arms of
the longest chromosome of the complement which are
unpaired (Figure 19), crossing over appears to be non-
localized. This is very unlike the pattem/situation in
those species of Tulbaghia so far investigated where
crossing over is almost exclusively proximal to the cen-
tromere (Vosa 1975, 2000). This pattern may indicate a
relatively higher degree of recombination than in Tul-
baghia where the average chiasmata, based on the anal-
yses of six diploid species, is much lower (Vosa 1966).
Gender is one of the most important genetic factors
affecting recombination frequency (Burt et al. 1991).
Hence the existence of a two-track heredity in Tulbaghia
(Vosa 1972 ) with a higher degree of genetic recombi-
nation in ovules than in microspores, may possibly be
somewhat enhanced in Prototulbaghia as a compensat-
ing recombination mechanism. Overall such hypotheti-
cal modified genetic inheritance in Prototulbaghia may
mean that the macromorphological uniformity observed
in nature in its populations hides a complex and spe-
cialized genomic arrangement. However, these ideas on
recombination frequency in Prototulbaghia still require
testing.
FIGURE 19. — Prototulbaghia siebertii. Micrograph of metaphase 1 of
meiosis (six bivalents have been numbered in order of decreas-
ing size). Note: in bivalent 1 , unpaired segments corresponding
to long arms of two involved chromosomes (small arrows). In
this metaphase, there are 24 chiasmata, 23 non-localized and one
proximal to centromere indicated by larger arrow. Scale bar: 10
pm.
The lack of recombination in the long arms of the
longest chromosome of Prototulbaghia (Figure 19) may
be a parallel evolutionary trend toward the state found
in all the species of the closely related Tulbaghia. The
existing cytological differences between the two genera
may be due to the hypothetical need of high recombi-
nation in Prototulbaghia for the genome as a whole to
maintain genetic variability as a narrow endemic with a
single population. The paradox is that although it may
seem tempting to regard Prototulbaghia as an entity
with some plesiomorphic features and most probably
sister to Tulbaghia and intermediate to Allium, the exist-
ence of the taxon-specific micromorphological and cyto-
logical features noted above may also be an indication
of its specialized and geographically isolated evolution
(‘trapped’ on its specialized mountain summit habit).
Observations of the cytology discussed above provide
evidence of a diagnostic character that provides support
for the hypothesis that Prototulbaghia may possess fea-
tures that are ancestral to Tulbaghia. Note, however, that
in Tulbaghia the grouping of species based on karyotype
(Vosa 1975, 2000) corresponds only in part to the sub-
divisions of the genus into sections based on floral mor-
phology (Vosa 2009). Such discrepancies demonstrate
that in Tulbaghia floral morphology and the karyotype
in many cases seem to follow independent evolutionary
pathways (Vosa 2009). Despite the similarity in karyo-
type, differences in floral morphology between Proto-
tulbaghia and Tulbaghia have also been documented by
Vosa (2007) and Siebert et al. (2008).
Available molecular phylogenetic analyses of
Alliaceae support a close relationship between Allium
and Tulbaghia, although hitherto only two (77 simmleri
Beauv. and T. violacea Harv.) of the 31 species of Tul-
baghia were considered (Fay & Chase 1996; Friesen et
al. 2006; Nguyen et al. 2008). In such restricted molecu-
lar analyses, the potentially misleading effects of poor
taxon sampling on phylogenetic analyses and their appli-
314
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
cations should be kept in mind (e.g. Heath et al. 2008).
There is an obvious need for a well-sampled molecular
phylogenetic analysis that includes Prototulbaghia and
more Tulbaghia species, together with other members of
the Alliaceae, to test proposed generic demarcations and
evolutionary trends in the family.
For the description of Prototulbaghia siebertii , see
Vosa et al. 2011. Newly observed features are:
Leaves have a row of tiny translucent teeth adpressed
toward the distal abaxial part below the apex; laticifers
present. Spathe valves subtend the inflorescence when the
flower scape emerges, gradually drying off. Flower scape
is covered by short, whitish, glandular hairs; keel present
towards the base, single, persistent, ridge-like, with trans-
lucent teeth. Flowers are fugacious. Perianth segments
are light green in the lower half; inner segments are 4.3
mm wide in the middle. Gynoecium has 2—4 ovules per
locule. Capsule has a withered style on top.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The North-West University and University of Pretoria
provided financial support.
REFERENCES
ARCHER, C. 2003. Alliaceae. In G. Germishuizen & N.L. Meyer,
Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14:
956, 957. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
BURT, A., BELL, G. & HARVEY, PH. 1991. Sex differences in recom-
bination. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 259-27 7 .
FAY, M.F. & CHASE, M.W. 1996. Resurrection of Themidaceae for the
Brodiaea alliance, and recircumscription of Alliaceae, Amaryl-
lidaceae and Agapanthoideae. Taxon 45: 44 1—4-5 1 .
FRIESEN, N„ FRITSCH, R.M. & BLATTNER, F.R. 2006. Phylogeny
and new intrageneric classification of Allium (Alliaceae) based
on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Aliso 22: 372-395.
HEATH, T.A., HEDTKE, S.M. & HILLIS, D.M. 2008. Taxon sampling
and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Systemat-
ics and Evolution 46: 239-257.
HUNZIKER, J.H. & SC'HAAL, B.A. 1983. Isozyme variation in diploid
tropical and octoploid subtropical-temperate species of Bulnesia.
The Journal of Heredity 74: 358-360.
KLOPPER, R.R., CHATELAIN, C„ BANNfNGER, V., HABASHI, C„
STEYN, H.M., DE WET, H.C., ARNOLD, T.H., GAUTIER, L„
SMITH, G.F. & SPICHIGER, R. 2006. Checklist of the flower-
ing plants of sub-Saharan Africa. An index of accepted names
and synonyms. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network
Report No. 42: 684, 685. SABONET, Pretoria.
MAHLBERG, P.G. 1993. Laticifers: an historical perspective. Botani-
cal Reviews 53: 1-23.
MANN, L.K. 1959. The Allium inflorescence: some species of the Sec-
tion Molium. American Journal of Botany 46: 730-739.
NGUYEN, N.H., DRISCOLL, H.E. & SPECHT, C.D. 2008. A molecu-
lar phylogeny of the wild onions ( Allium ; Alliaceae) with a focus
on the western North American centre of diversity. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 1157-1172.
SIEBERT, S.J., VOSA, C.G., VAN WYK, A.E. & MULLER, H. 2008.
Prototulbaghia (Alliaceae), a new monotypic genus from
Sekhukhuneland, South Africa. Herbertia 62: 76-84.
VAN WYK, A.E. & SMITH. G.F. 2001 . Regions offloristic endemism in
southern Africa. A review with emphasis on succulents. Umdaus
Press, Hatfield, Pretoria.
VOSA, C.G. 1961. A modified aceto-orcein method for pollen mother
cells. Catyologia 14: 107-110.
VOSA, C.G. 1966. Chromosome variation in Tulbaghia. Heredity 21:
305-312.
VOSA, C.G. 1972. Two-track heredity: differentiation of male and
female meiosis in Tulbaghia. Catyologia 25: 275-281.
VOSA, C.G. 1975. The cytotaxonomy of the genus Tulbaghia. Annali di
Botanica (Roma) 34: 47-121 .
VOSA, C.G. 2000. The revised cytotaxonomy of the genus Tulbaghia.
Catyologia 53: 83-112.
VOSA, C.G. 2007. Prototulbaghia , a new genus of the Alliaceae fam-
ily from the Leolo Mountains in Sekhukhuneland, South Africa.
Catyologia 60: 273-278.
VOSA, C.G. 2009. An updated and illustrated taxonomic synopsis of
the genus Tulbaghia (Alliaceae). Herbertia 63: 208-219.
VOSA, C.G., VAN WYK, A.E., SIEBERT, S.J. & CONDY, G. (Artist).
2011. Prototulbaghia siebertii. Flowering Plants of Africa 62:
22-28, t. 2264.
C.G. VOSA*, S.J. SIEBERT** and A.E. VAN WYK|
* Author for correspondence: Linacre College, Oxford, United King-
dom & Department of Biology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
E-mail: caniovosa@tin.it.
** A.P. Goossens Herbarium, School of Environmental Sciences and
Development, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, 2520 Potch-
efstroom. South Africa. E-mail: stefan. siebert@nwu.ac.za.
t H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria. E-mail: braam.vanwyk@up.ac.
za.
MS. received: 2010-05-28.
HYACINTHACEAE
ALBUCA GARIEPENSIS (ORNITHOGALOIDEAE), ANEW SPECIES OF A. SUBGEN. NAMIBIOGALUM FROM GORDONIA, SOUTH
AFRICA, AND A. PRASINA TRANSFERRED TO ORNITHOGALUM
INTRODUCTION
Generic limits in Hyacinthaceae: Ornitliogaloideae
have been intensively reviewed in recent years using
molecular techniques (Stedje 1998; Pfosser & Speta
1999; Manning et al. 2004, 2009; Martinez-Azorin et
at. 2011). The broad patterns of phylogenetic relation-
ships in the subfamily are now clear but various options
exist for the translation of these patterns into a generic
taxonomy (Manning el ah 2009; Martinez-Azorin et al.
201 1). A recent solution, followed here, provides for the
expansion of Albuca L. to include Ornithogalum sub-
gen. Osmytae (Salisb.) Baker and O. subgen. Urophyllon
(Salisb.) Baker (Manning et al. 2009). Ornithogalum is
consolidated to include the genera Galtonia Decne. and
Neopatersonia Schonland, leaving Dipcadi Medik. and
Pseudogaltonia (Kuntze) Engl, as the remaining gen-
era in the subfamily. In this circumscription, Albuca
is distinguished from Ornithogalum by flowers with
thick-textured, whitish or yellowish tepals with a broad,
green or brown longitudinal band on the adaxial surface
associated with 3-5 mostly simple, medially aggre-
gated veins (Manning et ah 2009). In Ornithogalum , the
tepals are thin- or thick-textured with a narrow or indis-
tinct median band and veins not tightly aggregated in
the middle of the tepals, and the outer veins are often ±
branched.
Several collections of narrow-leaved plants from the
middle reaches of the Orange River in Northern Cape,
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
315
with relatively short, pyramidal racemes of green-
banded flowers and relatively large, depressed-globose
or cordate capsules, have remained unnamed until now
or have been identified as Ornithogalum tenuifolium
subsp. aridum Oberrn. [now A/buca virens subsp. arida
(Oberm.) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt], Their large cap-
sules, however, preclude any association with A. virens ,
which has smaller, ovoid capsules, and it is now clear
that they represent an undescribed species, which we
describe here as A. gariepensis after the Khoisan name
for the Orange River, known to earlier inhabitants of the
region as the gariep or Great River.
Collections at KMG, NBG, PRE and SAM. the main
herbaria with good representation of collections of
Northern Cape species, were consulted for records of the
new species (herbarium acronyms after Holmgren et al.
1990).
In addition, examination of herbarium specimens
of Ornithogalum prasinum Ker Gawl., which was
transferred to Albuca by Manning et al. (2009) on the
strength of its supposedly close relationship to O. sein-
eri (Engl. & K. Krause) Oberm. (now A. seineri (Engl. &
K. Krause) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, reveals that it lacks
the perianth features that are diagnostic of Albuca. This,
combined with its karyology with basic chromosome
number x = 8, dictates its transfer back to the genus
Ornithogalum , where its large, retuse capsules suggest a
relationship with O. xanthochlorum Baker.
TAXONOMY
Albuca gariepensis J.C. Manning & Goldblatt sp.
nov.
Geophyta decidua 0.03-0.20 m alta, foliis (4)5— 8(9)
racemum duplo ad sexies longior linearibus pauciter
rotatis vel ad apicem tortis canaliculatis 70-200 x 1-4
mm, racemo subpyramidalo dense 8-25-florum, 30-80
mm longo. bracteis lanceolato-aristatis, inferioribus ad
20 x 3 mm submembranaceis ad papyraceis, pedicelis
± patentibus (5— )8— 1 0(— 1 5) mm longis, floribus rotatis
tepalis liberibus albis carinis viridibus oblongo-ellip-
ticis 7-10 x 2. 5-3. 5 mm, nervis centralibus tribus con-
gestis, staminibus liberibus erectis, filamentis 4-5 mm
longis inferioribus 1.5 mm expansis quadratiformis,
ovario ovoideo breve stipitato ± 3 mm longo profunde
3-angulato, stylo erecto ± 3 mm longo, capsula ambita
depresso-cordata profunde 3-lobata 10-12 x 15-20 mm
diam., seminibus discoideis 5-8 mm diam.
TYPE. — Northern Cape: 2921 (Kenhardt):10-12 km
NE of Putsonderwater along roadside. Farm Kareelaagte,
(-BB), 6 Mar. 2010, Manning 3294 (NBG, holo.; MO,
PRE. iso.).
Deciduous geophyte, 0.03-0.20 m high. Bulb solitary,
pyriform, 10-25 mm diam.; outer tunics dry and thinly
leathery, brownish, sometimes forming a loose neck
and finely transversely barred, inner tunics tightly over-
lapping, white. Leaves overtopping raceme and two to
six times as long, (4)5— 8(9), suberect or spreading, not
clasping below, linear, slightly coiled or twisted apically,
canaliculate and rounded abaxially, 70-200 x \-4 mm,
acute, fleshy, dull bluish green. Inflorescence usually
solitary but up to 3 from a bulb, subpyramidal, densely
8-25-flowered, 30-80 mm long at flowering, elongating
slightly and ± cylindrical in fruit, scape green and 1 .5-
3.0 mm diam. at ground level but subterranean portion
tapering strongly and white; bracts lanceolate-aristate,
lowermost up to 20 x 3 mm and uppermost ±7x2 mm,
apex often slightly coiled, whitish and submembranous
when young but becoming papery; pedicels ± spread-
ing, (5— )8— 1 0(— 1 5) mm long. Flowers held horizontally,
rotate, 14-20 mm diam., faintly scented of lemon-coco-
nut; tepals biseriate with outer series overlapping inner,
free, suberect in basal 1. 5-2.0 mm then spreading, white
with green keels adaxially, outer tepals oblong-elliptical,
7-10 x 2. 5-3.0 mm, slightly keeled apically and peni-
cillate, with 3 centrally congested veins, inner tepals
elliptical, 7-10 x 3. 0-3. 5 mm, concave apically and
penicillate, with 3 centrally congested veins. Stamens
free, erect; filaments 4-5 mm long, two thirds as long as
tepals, verruculose, both series with quadrate expansion
in basal 1.5 mm, outer expansion ± 1 mm wide, inner
1.5 mm wide; anthers versatile, ± 2 mm long at anthe-
sis, pale creamy yellow. Ovary ovoid and shortly stipi-
tate, ± 3 mm long, strongly 3-angled, green; style erect,
tapering, 3-angled, ± 3 mm long, acute with trigonous,
papillate stigma, green in lower half and white distally.
Capsule depressed-cordate in outline, deeply 3-lobed,
10-12 x 15-20 mm. Seeds discoid, 5-8 mm diam.. col-
liculate, glossy black. Flowering time ; January to early
April. Figures 20; 21.
Distribution and ecology. Albuca gariepensis seems
to be restricted to the central portion of the Orange River
drainage basin in northeastern Bushmanland, where it
has been collected in a region bounded by the towns of
Kakamas, Upington and Kenhardt (Figure 22). The spe-
cies has been recorded from calcrete plains and sandy
flats, often in slight washes or drainage lines where
seasonal soil moisture levels are higher. A. gariepensis
appears to be endemic to the Bushmanland Bioregion
of the Nama-Karoo Biome, primarily in Bushmanland
Arid Grassland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). Flower-
ing occurs in late summer, the exact timing evidently
depending on the seasonal rains. The collection Snij-
man 244 includes a plant bearing both mature fruiting
and flowering stems, indicating two growth flushes some
time apart, presumably in reponse to two distinct rainfall
events.
Diagnosis and relationships : the species of Albuca
with ± monomorphic tepal whorls are segregated among
four subgenera that are defined by a combination of
vegetative, floral, and fruiting characters (Manning
et al. 2009). The several, canaliculate leaves and the
pyramidal raceme of white flowers with shortly stipi-
tate, 3-lobed ovary developing into a depressed, apically
retuse capsule containing large, discoid seeds place A.
gariepensis in subgen. Namibiogalum (U.Mtill.-Doblies
& D.Miill.-Doblies) J.C. Manning & Goldlbatt (Manning
et al. 2009). Here, it is characterized by its several, lin-
ear-canaliculate leaves that are loosely coiled or twisted
apically and much longer (three to six times) than the
short inflorescence; its moderate-sized flowers, 14-20
mm in diameter, borne on pedicels mostly 8-10 mm
long; and relatively large, deeply 3-lobed capsules. The
316
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 20. — Albuca gariepensis, Manning 3294. A, flowering plants; B, bract; C, flower; D, outer tepal; E, inner tepal; F, outer stamen, adaxial
(upper) and abaxial (lower) views; G, inner stamen; H. ovary, lateral and dorsal views; I, capsule; J, seed. Scale bar: A-C, I, J, 10 mm; B,
C, 3 mm; D-H, 2 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
317
FIGURE 21. — Albuca gariepensis.
A, flowering plant, Man-
ning 3294. Photograph by
John Manning. B, fruiting
plant, Magee & Boatwright
229. Photograph by Anthony
Magee.
species is most similar to A. seineri (Engl. & K. Krause)
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt in foliage and inflorescence
but the latter is an altogether larger species, with ±
straight or arching leaves up to 400 * 30 mm (vs 70-200
x 1-4 mm), and larger flowers 24-40 mm in diameter
borne on longer pedicels, up to 50 mm long. Its area of
occurrence is north of that of A. gariepensis, ranging
from northern Namibia through Botswana and the north-
ern parts of Northern Cape (Prieska and Hopetown Dis-
tricts) into the western Free State, northern Mpumalanga
and Limpopo (Obermeyer 1978).
Smaller plants of Albuca gariepensis may be con-
fused with A. toxicaria (C. Archer & R.H. Archer)
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt from southern Namibia and
central South Africa, which has with similar, almost fili-
form leaves but which has smaller flowers, ± 10 mm in
diameter, very short pedicels 1.5-2. 2 mm long, minute,
deltoid bracts ± 1 .2 mm long, and much smaller, ovoid
capsules up to 10 x 5 mm containing elliptical, peripher-
ally winged seeds 8 * 5-6 mm (Archer & Archer 1999).
The filaments in Albuca gariepensis are abruptly
expanded at the base into quadrate wings, unlike the
smoothly tapering filaments in A. seineri and A. toxi-
caria. Similar, basally expanded filaments are charac-
teristic of some other species in the subgenus, notably
A. rautanenii (Schinz) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt and
A. stapfii (Schinz) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt. but the
ovary in both these species is abruptly expanded above
the stipe into a 6-lobed disc. Although the ovary in A.
gariepensis is slightly widened above the stipe, it does
not develop the characteristic lobes that are present in
these two species.
Additional specimens seen
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2820 (Kakamas): 31 km W of Kakamas
along road to Pofadder and Onseepkans, 800 m, (-CC), 31 Jan. 1974,
Davidse 6169 (PRE); 20 km S of Kakamas on road to Loeriesfontein,
789 m, (-DC), 14 Mar. 2010, Magee & Boatwright 229 (MO, NBG).
2821 (Upington): Upington, industrial commonage, 2700 ft [1 680 m],
1 Apr. 1980, Snijman 244 (NBG). 2921(Kenhardt): near Steenkop, SE
of Kenhardt, 900 m, (-AD), 7 Jan. 1989, Bntyns 3461 (NBG).
Omithogalum prasinum
Ornithogalum prasinum Ker Gawl. is relatively w ide-
spread through the drier parts of central South Africa,
extending into Namibia and Botswana (Obermeyer
1978). The species was misattributed to John Lindley
by Baker (1897) and subsequent authors, but John Bel-
lenden Ker[-Gawler] provided the text of the first 14
volumes of The botanical register , whereas Lindley was
responsible for volumes 15-33 (Stafleau & Cowan 1976:
724). Placed by Baker (1897) in O. subgen. Osmyne
(Salisb.) Baker, O. prasinum was subsequently trans-
ferred to subgen. Urophyllon (Salisb.) Baker by Ober-
meyer (1978), who considered it to be closely related
to O. seineri. This treatment was followed by Miiller-
Doblies & Muller-Doblies (1996), who included both
species in O. series Prasinocorymbosa Mtill.-Doblies &
Miill.-Doblies, and later by us when we transferred the
members of O. subgen. Urophyllon to Albuca (Manning
et al. 2009). At this time we had DNA sequence data for
O. seineri but not for O. prasinum and our association of
the two species was determined by the opinions of Ober-
meyer (1978) and Muller-Doblies & Muller-Doblies
(1996).
A review of the cytology of subfamily Ornithogaloi-
deae (Goldblatt & Manning 2011) shows A. prasina to
have a diploid number of 2 n = 16 (Pienaar 1963), thus
x = 8. This makes the species cytologically anomalous
in Albuca , in which the most common base number is x
= 9, and led us to re-examine its floral morphology, par-
ticularly the tepal venation, in relation to that of A. sein-
eri. We confirm that A. seineri (Figure 23 A, B), with 2 n
= 24 (x = 6) (Vosa 1980), has the medially aggregated,
mostly simple veins diagnostic of Albuca but that A.
FIGURE 22. — Known distribution of Albuca gariepensis.
318
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
FIGURE 23. — Albuca seineri , D’Ewes s.n. (NBG). A, outer tepal; B,
inner tepal. Ornithogalum prasinum , Barker 7116 (NBG). C,
outer tepal; D, inner tepal. Scale bar: 2 mm. Artist: John Man-
ning.
Cape], Colesberg Div., Hondeblafs River [Hondeblafri-
vier], fl. ex hort. 1816/18, Burchell bulb 49 (K, holo.!,
iso.!). Albuca prasina (Ker Gawl.) J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt: 92 (2009).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Type material was collected with a permit from
Northern Cape Nature Conservation and the necessary
field work was sponsored by Elizabeth Parker of Elands-
berg Nature Reserve, and Rosemary Smuts assisted in
the field. Michelle Smith prepared the digital map and
Stephen Boatwright the digital figure. Anthony Magee
kindly provided one of the photographs.
REFERENCES
prasina (Figure 23C. D) has a quite different, more dif-
fuse, branched venation which is characteristic of Orni-
thogalum. Colour notes on specimens confirm that the
tepals lack the distinct green median band that is char-
acteristic of Albuca. This is confirmed by the illustration
of cultivated plants from Burchell’s type collection (Ker
Gawler 1816), which shows the perianth to be uniformly
pale greenish white. Floral morphology thus supports
our cytological observations that O. prasinum is incor-
rectly placed in Albuca , and the species should accord-
ingly be transferred back to Ornithogalum.
Within Ornithogalum , the relationships of O. prasinum
evidently lie with O. haalenbergense U.Mull.-Doblies &
D.Mull.-Doblies and O. xanthochlorum Baker in O. sub-
gen. Galtonia sect. Xanthochlorum (U.Mull.-Doblies &
D.Mull.-Doblies) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, based on its
leathery outer bulb tunics, several lanceolate leaves, and
especially the diagnostic, depressed-globose, apically
retuse capsules containing large, discoid seeds 6-8 mm
in diameter (Manning el al. 2009). All three species also
have distinctive pale jade-green, rather obtuse tepals. The
basic and most common chromosome number in subgen.
Galtonia is x = 8 (Forrest & Jong 2004 [as Galtonia]),
providing cytological support for the morphological evi-
dence that A. prasina is allied to this subgenus of Orni-
thogalum.
Although Ker Gawler (1816) claimed that Burchell
collected Ornithogalum prasinum near Graaff-Reinet
in Eastern Cape, Burchell’s own labels on his collec-
tions indicate that he found the plants at Horse’s Grave
near the Hondeblats (sic.) River in the Colesberg Divi-
sion. The latter is a reference to one of his collecting
localities near De Aar (Leistner & Morris 1976), which
accords with the location of Hondeblafrivier that flows
through Philipstown. The type locality of the species is
thus in Northern Cape, between De Aar and Philipstown.
The species has, however, subsequently been collected
around Aberdeen in Eastern Cape (Obermeyer 1978),
from where it ranges westwards across the interior of the
country as far as Aus in southern Namibia (Obermeyer
1978).
Ornithogalum prasinum Ker Gawl. in The
botanical register 2: sub. t. 158 (1816). Type: [Northern
ARCHER, C. & ARCHER, R.H. 1999. A new species of Ornithoga-
lum subgenus Urophyllon (Hyacinthaceae) from central South
Africa and southern Namibia. South African Journal of Botany
65: 431—433.
BAKER, J.G. 1897. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 253-528. Reeve, Ashford.
FORREST, L.L. & JONG, K. 2004. Bimodality in the karyotype of
Galtonia (Hyacinthaceae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 60:
569-579.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2011. A review of chromosome
cytology in Hyacinthaceae subfamily Ornithogaloideae ( Albuca ,
Dipcadi , Ornithogalum and Pseudogaltonia ) in sub-Saharan
Africa. South African Journal of Botany 77 : 581-591.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part 1 : the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
KER-GAWLER, J. 1816. Ornithogalum prasinum. The botanical regis-
ter 2: t. 158. Ridgway, London.
LEISTNER, O.A. & MORRIS, J.W. 1976. South African place names.
Annals of the Cape Provinical Museums 12. Cape Provincial
Museums, Grahamstown.
MANNING, J.C., FORREST, F„ DEVEY, D.S., FAY, M.F. & GOLD-
BLATT, P. 2009. A molecular phylogeny and a revised classifica-
tion of Ornithogaloideae (Hyacinthaceae) based on an analysis
of four plastid DNA regions. Taxon 58: 77-107.
MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P. & FAY, M.F. 2004. A revised
generic synopsis of Hyacinthaceae in sub-Saharan Africa, based
on molecular evidence, including new combinations and the
new tribe Pseudoprospereae. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 60:
533-568.
MARTINEZ- AZORIN, M„ CRESPO, M.B., JUAN, A. & FAY, M.F.
2011. Molecular phylogenetics of subfamily Ornithogaloideae
(Hyacinthaceae) based on nuclear and platid DNA regions,
including a new taxonomic arrangement. Annals of Botany 107:
1-37.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD. M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D. 1996. Revi-
sionula incompleta Omithogalorum Austro-Africanorum (Hya-
cinthaceae). Feddes Repertorium 107: 361-548.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1978. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern
African species. Bothalia 12: 323-376.
PFOSSER, M. & SPETA, F. 1999. Phylogenetics of Hyacinthaceae
based on plastid DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botani-
cal Garden 86: 852-875.
PIENAAR, R. DE V. 1963. Sitogenetiese studies in die genus Orni-
thogalum L. Journal of South African Botany 29: 111-131.
STAFLEAU, A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976. Taxonomic literature 1: A-G.
Bonn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.
STEDJE, B. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation
of sub-Saharan Scilla (Hyacinthaceae) and allied African genera
as inferred from morphological and DNA sequence data. Plant
Systematics and Evolution 211: 1-11 .
VOSA, C. 1980. Chromosome analysis and heterochromatin recogni-
tion in the southern African species of Ornithogalum. 1. Orni-
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
319
thogalum seineri (Engl. & Kr.) Oberm. Journal of South African
Botany 46: 445-450.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town / Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, 3209 Scottsville, South Africa. E-mail: J.Manning@sanbi.org.za.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2010-04-06.
FABACEAE
ANEW SPECIES OF RHYNCHOSIA FROM THE NORTHERN PROVINCES OF SOUTH AFRICA
Inspection of the Rhynchosia Lour, collections of
the National Herbarium, Pretoria while preparing for a
revision of the group for the Flora of southern A frica ,
revealed that a number of specimens identified as Rhyn-
chosia confusa Burtt Davy did not belong to that taxon.
As far as can be established. Dr L.E.W. Codd recognised
specimens he collected in 1946 and 1947 as being some-
thing different, although the first specimen had been
recorded in 1923 by E.E. Galpin.
Rhynchosia coddii Germish., sp. nov., habitu R.
confusae Burtt Davy similis sed indumento aureo glan-
duloso leguminibusque dehiscis arete tortilibus differt.
TYPE. — North-West, 2527 (Rustenburg): Rustenburg
Dist., Baviaanskrans Farm, on mountain slope at Tier-
kloof, on well-drained stony, sandy soil, (-CA), 29-10-
1977, G. Germishuizen 399 (PRE, holo.).
Erect, decumbent or trailing herb or suffrutex up
to 0.6 m tall, with annual stems arising from a thick,
woody, underground rootstock up to 20 mm diam.;
young parts densely covered with patent, golden-yellow,
glandular trichomes. Stipules subulate, up to 4.5 mm
long, mostly reflexed, reddish brown, strongly ribbed,
glandular hairy on outside, glabrous inside. Stems and
leaves with glandular trichomes, sticky to the touch,
with small sand particles adhering to them. Leaves alter-
nate; leaflets pinnately 3-foliolate, with distinct inucro
at apex, up to 0.5 mm long, conspicuously reticulate-
veined on both surfaces, covered with patent glandular
trichomes especially on veins; lower surface with glan-
dular trichomes interspersed with small, raised, golden
glands scattered in intervenal areas; terminal leaflets
narrowly elliptic to broadly ovate, ( 1 7—) 1 9— 24(— 30 ) x
1 2— 20(— 25 ) mm; lateral leaflets oblique or narrowly to
broadly ovate, 1 7— 24(— 26) x (11 — ) 1 2— 22(— 24) mm; peti-
ole variable, 12-23 mm long, glandular hairy; margin
entire. Inflorescence an axillary, 2-5-flowered raceme.
Corolla yellow with standard petal dark brown (fide
Galpin M629 ) sometimes tinged reddish. Calyx with
lobes up to 8 mm long, free for almost two thirds their
length, upper 2 lobes fused slightly higher up, densely
glandular hairy, persistent in fruit. Standard petal nar-
rowly suborbicular to broadly ovate, 10-12 x 4-8 mm,
apex emarginate, base cuneate. Wing petal oblong,
8-10 x 3—4 mm, auricle weakly developed. Keel petals
oblong, 9-10 x 3—4 mm, pocket weakly developed, apex
obtuse. Stamens 10, reddish brown; 9 filaments fused
into a staminal column, vexillary filament free to base.
Pistil with ovary flatfish, reddish brown; style sigmoid,
covered on one side with silky hairs; stigma capitate.
Pods oblong-falcate, 20-22 x 6 mm, straw-coloured to red-
dish brown, covered with glandular trichomes and raised
golden glands especially when young, beaked; beak up
to 4.5 mm long, curling up into tight roll when dehisced.
Seeds broadly kidney-shaped, 5x4x4 mm, reddish brown
mottled with black; aril yellow, fleshy, persistent. Flowering
time : Oct.-Mar. Figures 25; 26.
Etymology : the specific epithet honours Dr Leslie
Edward Wostall Codd (1908-1999), former director of
the Botanical Research Institute [now the South African
National Biodiversity Institute] (Glen & Germishuizen
2010), who recorded specimens of this undescribed spe-
cies in 1946 and 1947 at various localities.
Distribution and ecology. Rhynchosia coddii is found
in the Northern Cape Province near the border with the
North-West Province; also found in Gauteng, Mpuma-
langa and Limpopo Provinces (Figure 27). Plants grow
mostly in SVcb: Marikana Thomveld, and SVcbl2:
Central Sandy Bushveld (Mucina & Rutherford 2006),
often on steep rocky slopes. Plants are heavily grazed
(fide GubbPRE825 1 84).
Relationships', the new taxon resembles Rhyncho-
sia confusa in its sprawling, prostrate habit with annual
stems arising from a thick, woody, underground root-
stock and initial material was identified as such, but here
the resemblance ends. R. coddii is immediately distin-
guished by having a golden-yellow glandular vestiture
throughout and pods which curl up into a tight roll when
dehisced. See Table 3 for comparison between the two
taxa.
TABLE 3. — Comparison between Rhynchosia coddii and R. confusa
Other material examined
NORTHERN PROVINCE [LIMPOPO].— 2229 (Waterpoort):
Louis Trichardt, Farm Wellington, (-DC), 25-03-1994, G.L. Ros-
souw 209 (PRE). 2329 (Polokwane): Louis Trichardt Dist., on Farm
320
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
FIGURE 25. — Rhynchosia coddii. A-C, G. Germishuizen 963 : A, habit, » 1; B, flowering branch, x 2; C, fruiting branch and single seed, x 1. G.
Germishuizen 399: D, rolled-up pod, x 1. Artist: Gillian Condy.
FIGURE 26. — Rhynchosia coddii, G. Germishuizen 399. details of flower: A, calyx spread open (upper lobes to right), x 3; B, keel petals, x
3; C, standard petal, x 3; D. wing petals, x 3; E, pistil, x 3; F, vexillary filament, * 3; G, staminal column, x 3. Artist: Gillian Condy.
Lesheba, 50 km from Louis Trichardt on southern Vivo road, (-BA),
25-03-1994, H. Joffe 1066. 1069 (PRE); Louis Trichardt, (-BB),
10-1921, H.G. Brijer s.n. (TRV24380). 2428 (Nylstroom): Waterberg,
Ratelhoek, (-AD), 07-11-1978, G. Germishuizen 963 (PRE); Sterk-
rivierdam Nature Reserve, gentle S-facing slope, (-BC), 09-02-1972,
N. Jacobsen 2071 (PRE); Mosdene, Naboomspruit, on Klipputgat Pla-
teau, (-DA), 12-05-1923, E.E. Galpin M629 (PRE).
NORTH-WEST. — 2526 (Zeerust): Rustenburg Dist., Zwartrug-
gens, in kloofs, 4100' [1 510 m], (-DA), 11-07-1936, J.D. Sutton 1107
(PRE). 2527 (Rustenburg): Brits, Beestekraal Game Reserve, near
Atlanta Station, 1 000 m, (-BA), 16-06-1990, N.P. Barker 896 (PRE);
Tonquani, mid-N slopes of Magaliesberg, (-CD), 30-03-1971, A.O.D.
Mogg 37617 (PRE).
GAUTENG. — 2528 (Pretoria): Middelkop, Middelkop Farm, near
Pienaar’s River, (-AB), 01-1926, C.A. Smith 2194 (PRE); 38 km from
Pretoria on Pietersburg [Polokwane] highway, (-AD), 03-03-1986,
G. Germishuizen 3693 (PRE); Pretoria Dist., Botanical Reserve, near
FIGURE 27. — Known distribution of Rhynchosia coddii based on spec-
imens in National Herbarium, Pretoria.
wireless mast, on S side of ridge, (-CA), 06-02-1947, L.E.W. Codd
2588 (PRE); 15 miles [24.1 km] NW of Pretoria, N-facing slopes
of Magaliesberg, (-CA), 17-07-1946, L.E.W. Codd 1536 (PRE);
Bronkhorstspruit Dist., Rhenosterkop, (-DB), 07-02-1932, R.G.N.
Young 2098 (PRE). 2628 (Johannesburg): Heidelberg Dist., Kloof,
2 miles [3.2 km] N of Heidelberg, (-AD), 11-12-1946, L.E.W. Codd
2326 (PRE); Suikerbosrand, entrance at Nolte B2, S-facing slope of
kloof, 5500' [1 680 m], (-CB), 15-12-1971, G.J. Bredenkamp 399
(PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2529 (Witbank): Middelburg Dist., Bothsa-
belo Mission, 9 miles [14.4 km] N of Middelburg, on banks of Klein
Olifants River, (-CB), 27-04-1947, L.E.W. Codd & R.A.Dver 2870
(PRE).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2723 (Kuruman): Kuruman Dist., Mansfield
Farm, S-facing slope on steep hill, (-CB), 14-03-1981, A. A. Gubb s.n.
(PRE 825184).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks go to Gillian Condy for the drawings, Dr
O.A. Leistner, formerly of the South African National
Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, for providing
the Latin diagnosis, and Hester Steyn of SANBI for pro-
ducing the distribution map.
REFERENCES
GLEN, H.F. & GERMISHUIZEN, G. (Compilers). 2010. Botanical
exploration, edn 2. Strelitzia 26: 1 — 489. South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
G. GERMISHUIZEN*
* South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , 000 1
Pretoria.
MS. received: 2011-04-13.
LYCOPODIOPHYTA: SELAGINELLACEAE
SELAGINELLA NIVEA, ANEW LYCOPHYTE RECORD FOR SOUTH AFRICA, WITH NOTES ON ITS HABITAT
Selaginella nivea Alston ex Alston was first described
from southern Madagascar where it grows on rocks in
Euphorbia spp. and Didierea spp. xerophilous bush
(Stefanovic & Rakotondrainibe 1996). The species has
since been recorded in Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozam-
bique where it is typically associated with sandy habitat in
Colophospermum mopane savanna mostly along the Lim-
popo River Valley (Burrows 1990; Roux 2009).
We here report on the first records of Selaginella
nivea in South Africa (Figure 28). The first collection of
322
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
FIGURE 28. — Known distribution of Selaginella nivea in southern
Africa, •; new localities in South Africa, ▲.
this species in South Africa was made between Alldays
and Musina [Messina] in the Limpopo Province, where
it occurs in mixed Colophospermum mopane savanna of
the Musina Mopane Bushveld vegetation type (Mucina
& Rutherford 2006). The species grows in well-drained,
fine gravel in open areas, occasionally interspersed with
grasses. Despite the recent good rains that occurred, all
plants were in a desiccated state and sterile. Plants form
colonies up to I nr in size. No plants were found on
open sandy areas where only stunted Colophospermum
mopane trees occur, nor in mixed savanna growing on a
more rocky substrate.
A second collection of this species was made in the
N’tsiri Nature Reserve in northern Mpumalanga. At
this site the plants occur in mixed Colophospermum
mopane-Acacia-Combretum savanna of the Phala-
borwa-Timbavati Mopaneveld vegetation type (Mucina
& Rutherford 2006). This area represents the southern-
most extent of mopane savanna in South Africa. Habitat
and substrate were similar to that of the record from the
Musina region. Plants collected at N’tsiri were fertile,
containing a few 4-ranked sporophylls.
During a later visit to the Letaba area of the Kruger
National Park (KNP) in northern Limpopo Province,
several populations of Selaginella nivea were seen in
habitat similar to those described above (these are listed
under Sight records ). Most of the plants in the KNP also
occur in Phalaborwa-Timbavati Mopaneveld (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006). However, the two populations found
on road S47 were in Tsende Mopanieveld and on the
boundary between Lowveld Rugged Mopanieveld and
Mopanie Basalt Shrubland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).
For obvious reasons, no specimens could be collected,
but negotiations with SANParks to obtain herbarium
vouchers from these sites are underway.
Selaginella nivea is a member of Selaginella sub-
gen. Tetragonostachys Jerrny (1986). This species is
characterized by 4-ranked strobili, club-shaped terminal
branches (Figure 29) with glaucous leaves that turn grey
to pale creamy brown when dry and that are seemingly
randomly arranged. Furthermore, the dried leaves of
S. nivea tend to break off early. Other members of this
subgenus in southern Africa, with which S. nivea can
be confused, are S. dregei (C.Presl) Hieron., S. grisea
Alston and S. caffrorum (Milde) Hieron. var. caffrorum ,
as well as S. njamnjamensis Hieron. that occurs further
to the north from Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique and
into tropical Africa, with an unconfirmed record from
southern Botswana (Schelpe & Anthony 1986; Burrows
1990; Roux 2009). A summary of the features separat-
ing S. nivea from other Selaginella species in subgen.
Tetragonostachvs known from the region is provided in
Tabled.
Selaginella nivea is under-collected and often mis-
identified, given its superficial resemblance to the
much more common and widespread S. dregei. How-
ever, its habitat does not overlap with the other regional
FIGURE 29. — Selaginella nivea
with short, club-shaped ter-
minal branches. Photograph:
A.W. Klopper.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
323
TABLE 4. — Characters separating members of Selaginella subgen. Tetragonostachys
members of the subgenus, all of which occur on rocky
areas only (Burrows 1990). The habitat of a specimen
of S. dregei (C.C. Straub 516 at PRE) collected in the
Pontdrift area was described as ‘rocky sandstone, level
places on rock’, but the collector mentions that this plant
was ‘also seen in mopane veld'. This probably refers
to populations of S. nivea in the mopane veld and is an
example of the easy misidentification of S. nivea and its
resultant under-collected status. It may further explain
why this taxon was not previously recorded for South
Africa, even though, based on the new records reported
here, it probably occurs in a very wide area from the
extreme north of Mpumalanga and throughout the north-
ern Limpopo Province where suitable habitat is present.
Furthermore, the general areas in which the new col-
lections were made are poorly sampled as far as lyco-
phytes and pteridophytes are concerned. Before the
discovery of Selaginella nivea in the Musina region,
and the simultaneous collecting of 5. dregei on a nearby
rock outcrop, no previous collections of any lycophytes
or pteridophytes have been made for this quarter-degree
square grid (QDS: 2229DA). Of the surrounding eight
QDS grids, a further four currently have no lycophyte or
pteridophyte records. As for the N'tsiri QDS (243 1AB)
only one previous collection, that of S. dregei, exists,
whereas two of the surrounding QDS currently have no
lycophyte or pteridophyte records. Although these dry
areas are not rich in lycophyte and pteridophyte flora,
they are clearly being neglected as far as the collecting
of these taxa is concerned.
Specimens examined
LIMPOPO. — 2229 (Waterpoort): Musina Dist., Farm Riebelton
488, (-DA), 13-02-2011, R.R. Klopper & A.W. Klopper 461 (BNRH,
NBG. PRE); Musina Dist., Farm Twyfelfontein 483. near house, (—
DA), 13-02-2011, R.R. Klopper & A. W. Klopper 462 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2431 (Acomhoek): N’tsiri Nature Reserve,
east of Floedspruit, along Cobra Link road, (-AB), 12-03-2011, L.
Smook 12233 (PRE).
Sight records
LIMPOPO.— 2331 (Phalaborwa): Kruger National Park, Road S51,
2 km from intersection with H9, near Masorini, (— CC), 02-05-2011;
Road H9 near Masorini, (— CC), 02-05-2011; Road S47, 4.2 km from
intersection with Road S 1 3 1 , (-CC), 03-05-2011; Road S47, 13 km
from intersection with Road S 1 3 1 , (— CC), 03-05-2011; Road H9, near
H14/S51 intersections, (-CD), 02-05-2011; southern point of loop S51,
(-CD), 02-05-2011.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Michael Frosch for giv-
ing permission to look for and collect material on Rie-
belton and Twyfelfontein Farms; Lyn Fish and Lesley
Henderson for recognizing and collecting material fol-
lowing casual discussions regarding this taxon; Johan
Bezuidenhout from N’tsiri Nature Reserve for assist-
ance in obtaining a GPS reading for the locality; Jan and
Alta Saunders for facilitating a joint visit to the Kruger
National Park and their help in looking for populations
within the park; and two anonymous referees for sug-
gesting improvements to the manuscript.
REFERENCES
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern Afi-ican ferns and fern allies. Frand-
sen Publishers, Sandton.
JERMY, A.C. 1986. Subgeneric names in Selaginella. Fern Gazette 13:
117, 118.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD. M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Ptendophyta
of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23.
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In
O.A. Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria.
STEFANOVIC, S. & RAKOTONDRAINIBE, F. 1996. New taxa and a
new rank of Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) from Madagascar and
the Comores. Novon 6: 203-209.
A.W. KLOPPER* and R.R. KLOPPER**
* Molecular Ecology & Evolution Programme, Department of Genetics,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria. E-mail: arrie.klopper@up.ac.za.
** Biosystematics Research and Biodiversity Collections Division,
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001
Pretoria / Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, 0002
Pretoria. E-mail: R.Klopper@sanbi.org.za.
MS. received: 2011-04-13.
324
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
IRIDACEAE
GLADIOLUS DILUVIALIS (CROCOIDEAE), A REPLACEMENT NAME FOR THE ILLEGITIMATE HOMONYM G. HALOPHILUS
Katherine Challis, International Plant Name List Edi-
tor, has kindly alerted us to the fact that our recently
described Gladiolus halophilus Goldblatt & J.C. Manning
(Manning et al. 2011) from southern Namibia is an ille-
gitimate homonym of G. halophilus Boiss. & Heldr.
(1854) from central Anatolia, northeastern Iraq and west-
ern Iran.
We provide the replacement name Gladiolus diluvia-
lis for the Namibian species, reflecting its narrow escape
from flooding by the proposed dam on the Fish River.
In an interesting addition to the ecology of the species,
Warren McLeland, the Consulting Ecologist who dis-
covered the species, notes that ‘...what seemed to be
unique about the seeps where we did find the Gladiolus
is the hydraulics of the wetlands. These wetlands are
very wet during the middle of the dry season and bone
dry during the summer. Our theory is that there is very
slow subsurface seepage off the escarpment to the east
that recharges these wetlands in winter, while the limited
summer rainfall is not sufficient to keep the wetlands
wet. As a result we have a winter-flowering Gladiolus in
a summer rainfall areal’ (McLeland pers. comm. 1 June
2011).
Gladiolus diluvialis Goldblatt & J.C. Manning,
nom. nov. pro G. halophilus [as ‘ halophila ’] Goldblatt &
J.C. Manning in South African Journal of Botany 77: 791
(2011), horn, illegit., non G. halophilus Boiss. & Heldr.
(Boissier 1854).
REFERENCES
BOISSIER, P.E. 1854. Diagnoses plantarum orientation novarum, ser.
1,13. Como, Paris.
MANNING, J.C., MANNHEIMER, C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2011. Back
from the brink: Gladiolus halophila (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), a
remarkable new species from southern Namibia escapes immi-
nent extinction. South African Journal of Botany 77: 790-794.
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town / Research Centre for
Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa. E-mail: J.Manning@sanbi.org.za.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2011-06-29.
ASTERACEAE
BRYOMORPHE AN D D0L/C7/077/m'(GNAPHALIEAE-RELHANIINAE): TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE
INTRODUCTION
The genus name Bryomorphe Harv. is derived from
the Greek bryon for moss and inorphe for form (Har-
vey 1863; Jackson 1990), to describe an unusual plant
with a moss-like habit in the South African Gnaphalieae.
The name Dolichothrix Hilliard & Burtt comes from the
Greek dolicho for long and thrix for hair (Jackson 1990)
and refers to the long, silky twin hairs on the cypselas.
These two monotypic genera belong to the Metala-
sia group in the tribe Gnaphalieae, subtribe Relhaniinae,
as described by Anderberg (1991). This group of genera
is defined by small, xerophytic leaves with a tomentose
adaxial surface and by white, pink or plum-red florets
(as opposed to the Relhania group with yellow florets).
Although the two genera are quite distinct and easy to iden-
tify, even in a sterile state, their nomenclature has been con-
fused in the past. Dolichothrix has very small adpressed,
scale-like leaves, white involucral bracts, discoid heads and
long, silky, twin hairs on the cypsela, whereas Bryomorphe
has longer ericoid leaves, chaffy involucral bracts, radiate
heads, with small white ray florets, wine-red disc florets
and smooth cypselas.
Bryomorphe is restricted to the Western Cape where
it is found in mountainous areas from near sea level
(Vogelklip, Hermanus) to altitudes of up to 2 250 m (top
of Matroosberg, De Dooms). The northernmost collec-
tion is from the Cederberg and the easternmost from
the Klein Swartberg. It grows in shallow soil in rock
crevices in Table Mountain Sandstone and is compact
and well anchored to withstand extreme weather condi-
tions. Plants are often found on exposed rock faces that
are ravaged by strong winds, cold, snow and drought.
These moss-like cushion plants create within themselves
a microclimate of moisture and temperature, and in the
process minimize evaporation (Zalensky 1948; Bokhari
& Wendelbo 1985) to ensure their survival.
Other unique characteristics of Btyomorphe are the
presence of aerial roots and the arrangement of hairs on
the abaxial leaf surface (Koekemoer 2002). B. aretioi-
des is the only species in the Metalasia group in which
aerial roots were observed. This can possibly be attrib-
uted to the cushion growth form of the plants. When the
branches in an apparently single cushion are untangled,
it is clear that each cushion consists of a number of indi-
vidual plants. After flowering, capitula disintegrate and
many seeds drop into the dense mass of branches in the
cushion, where they germinate but are unable to anchor
in the ground. Therefore they develop aerial roots to
anchor themselves to other branches and to gain access
to nutrients. In most species of the Metalasia group, a
thin, arachnoid, hairy layer covers the abaxial leaf sur-
face. In Bryomorphe these hairs are oriented toward the
leaf tip, to create a striate or combed appearance.
When in full flower, Btyomorphe is a very attractive
plant (see illustration in Paterson-Jones 1997) and it could
have potential as a horticultural subject for alpine gardens.
Dolichothrix is also endemic to the inland moun-
tains of the Western Cape with a single collection from
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
near Jansenville in the Eastern Cape. It grows in rock
crevices on vertical rocks or on rock slabs in sandstone
and quartzite, at altitudes between I 100 and 2 300 m
in slightly more arid environments than Bryomorphe. In
the Witteberg it is quite common on rock outcrops and
grows up to 0.4 m tall.
NOMENCLATURE
Turczaninow (1851) described Helichrysum aretioi-
des from the specimen (Zeyher 2908) collected on the
Cape Mountains. This Russian botanist and adminis-
trator, a civil servant in the Departments of Justice and
Finances (Stafleu & Cowan 1986), collected actively in
the areas where he served, and published mainly on the
Russian and Chinese floras. He is relatively unknown in
the history of southern African botany but was a contem-
porary of Cassini, De Candolle and Thunberg. He most
probably received the Zeyher specimen from De Can-
dolle, with whom he corresponded frequently (letters in
G, Stafleu & Cowan 1986).
Harvey (1863) described a new genus, Btyomor-
phe, for this unusual plant but was not satisfied to have
the sterile specimen of Zeyher 2908 in TCD as a type
(duplicates in K, P, PRE, S, SAM and TCD) (acronyms
according to Holmgren et al. 1990; electronic specimen
seen, denoted by el). He selected a second specimen,
Roser 42 , on which he based his description and illustra-
tion for B. zeyheri. In this description Harvey cited H.
aretioides Turcz. as a synonym, which is based on the
same type collection, Zeyher 2908. Unfortunately Har-
vey (1863) also cited Klenzea lycopodioides Sch.Bip. as
a synonym. Harvey’s citation of these two earlier names
makes his name illegitimate and superfluous.
Levyns (1942) therefore chose the oldest name and
made the new combination, Bryomorphe lycopodioides
(Sch.Bip.) Levyns, based on Klenzea lycopodioides
Sch.Bip. It is very unlikely that she saw the specimen
of Krauss before she made this combination because
Bryomorphe and Dolichothrix are very distinct mono-
typic genera and can not be confused, even on very poor
sterile material. The holotype of K. lycopodioides in the
Paris Herbarium (Krauss s.n., Dist. George, Roodewal)
clearly represents a plant we today know as Dolichothrix
ericoides (Lam.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt.
Druce (1917) made the correct combination, Biyo-
morphe aretioides (Turcz.) Druce, and he should be fol-
lowed.
Fairly recently, the name Helichrysum aretioides
Turcz. has come into use and was taken up in Klopper
et al. (2006) as a synonym of Dolichothrix ericoides.
As far as I can establish, Turczaninow never described
such a species and the name may just be the result of
an orthographic error due to misreading ‘are’ as ‘arc' in
poor copies of the original text.
TAXONOMY
Bryomorphe Harv. in Thesaurus capensis 2: 33,
t. 151 (1863); Benth.: 324 (1873); Harv.: 277 (1865);
325
E. Phillips: 800 (1951); Herman et al.: 127 (2000). Type
species: Bryomorphe aretioides (Turcz.) Druce.
Bryomorphe aretioides (Turcz.) Druce , Second
supplement to Botanical Society & Exchange Club of
the British Isles, Report for 1916, vol. 4: 611 (1917).
Helichrysum aretioides Turcz.: 79 (1851). Type: South
Africa, summits of Table and Hottentots Holland Mtns,
common but rarely flowering, Zevher 2908 (KW, holo.
el; PI, Kl, PRE!, S!, SAM!, TCD!, iso.).
B. zeyheri Harv.: 33. t. 151 (1863); Harv.: 277 (1865), nom. ille-
git. superfl., syn. nov. Type: South Africa, summit of Genadendal Mtn,
5000’ [1 524 m], Roser 42 (TCD. holo.!).
B. lycopodioides sensu Levyns: 283 (1942). [Levyns based this
name on Klenzea lycopodioides Sch.Bip., which is a synonym of Doli-
chothrix ericoides (Lam.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt.]
Small, tufted, copiously branched, moss-like shru-
blets, up to 70 mm high. Main branches woody, densely
leafy throughout, up to 1.5 mm diam., compacted into
rock crevices; aerial roots present. Leaves sessile,
closely imbricate, ascending, linear; slightly incurved;
abaxial surface tomentose, hairs longitudinally striate,
adaxial surface woolly, margins entire. Capitula hetero-
gamous, radiate, 5-6 x 3^1 mm, 12-14-flowered with 6
or 7 ray and 7-9 disc florets; one to three capitula termi-
nal on branches, partially imbedded in uppermost leaves.
Involucral bracts 24-31; outer bracts ovate, foliaceous
in upper part and along midveins, inner bracts linear
to narrowly oblong, up to 5 mm long, scarious, tips
rounded with large lateral wings clasping florets. Recep-
tacle rounded, less than 2 mm diam., alveolate. Ray
florets white, female, lamina ± 2.0 x 1.5 mm, 3-lobed,
tube 4. 5-5. 5 mm long. Disc florets plum-red. bisexual,
5-lobed, 3. 5-4.0 mm long. Anthers apically acuminate,
basally tailed. Sty’le bifid, apices of style branches in ray
florets rounded, sweeping hairs not tufted, tips of style
branches in disc florets truncate, sweeping hairs tufted.
Nectaries a small disc between style base and cypsela.
Cypsela terete, ± 1 mm long, straw-coloured, laevigate;
pappus setae free, ( 14— )1 8— 22(— 28), ± 4.5 mm long,
barbed in lower four-fifths, densely plumose in upper
fifth, occasionally interspersed with clavate cells, cell
tips acuminate or rounded, often filled with a yellowish
residue. Flowering time : mainly in Oct. to Jan., occa-
sionally in Aug., Sept, and Feb.
Dolichothrix Hilliard & B.L.Burtt in Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 221 (1981); Herman
et al.: 134 (2000). Type species: Dolichothrix ericoides
(Lam.) Hilliard & Burtt.
Dolichothrix ericoides (Lam.) Hilliard & B.L.Burtt
in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 221
(1981). Xeranthemum ericoides Lam.: 240 (1789). Heli-
chrysum ericoides (Lam.) Pers.: 415 (1807). Argyrocome
ericoides (Lam.) Lam.: t. 693, f. 2 (1823). Aphelexis eri-
coides (Lam.) Sweet: 223 (1826). Gnaphalium argyro-
coma Sch.Bip.: 169 (1845). Type: Cape of Good Hope,
Sonnerat s.n. (P-LAM, holo.!).
Stoebe nivea Thunb.: 170 (1800); Wi lid. : 2408 (1803); Thunb.: 729
(1823). Type: Cape of Good Hope, Thunberg s.n. sub THUNB-UPS
20976 (UPS, holo. !).
Klenzea lycopodioides Sch.Bip.: 973 (1843), syn. nov. Bryomorphe
lycopodioides (Sch.Bip.) Levyns (1942), syn. nov. Type: Inter rupes
326
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
montium prope Roodewal, dist. George in Promontorio bonae spei,
Krauss s.n., (P, holo. !).
Woody dwarf shrubs, 0.1-0.2(-0.4) m tall, often with
a stunted growth. Main stems usually firmly anchored
in rock crevices, secondary and tertiary branches erect,
often appearing one-sided on herbarium specimens;
very old plants may develop a woody base with numer-
ous buds and remains of old stems; main stems up to 8
mm diam., new growth white-woolly, greying with age;
secondary stems ± 2 mm diam., branching copiously
from below previous season’s capitulum, woolly-hairy;
branches foliaceous throughout. Leaves small, scale-
like, tightly adpressed, not more than 2 mm long and
just as wide, adaxial surface woolly-hairy; abaxial sur-
face arachnoid, appearing shiny, very densely glandular.
Capitula homogamous, discoid, 6-8 mm long, 1-3 ter-
minal on branches, 24-28-flowered, spreading funnel-
like from a narrow base; up to 8 mm diam. at opening.
Involucral bracts 48-52, in several rows, white, not
translucent, reflexed in upper third, tips opaque, milky-
white; receptacle flat, alveolate, 1.5-1. 7 mm diam. Flor-
ets ± 3.5 mm long, scarcely widening towards lobes,
lobes pilose outside, often reddish. Anthers : apical
appendages acuminate, basally tailed. Style bifid, basally
swollen, branches slightly rounded. Nectaries absent.
Cvpsela with very dense, white, straight and stiff twin
hairs; ribs 5, narrow; pappus fused in a ring at base,
18-24 setae, barbed to shortly plumose throughout, hairs
fused into a flat tip with hair apices rounded and inflated.
Flowering time : sporadic, mainly from Dec. to Mar.,
rarely in Aug.
The popular name for this plant, ‘rock rhenoster’,
refers to its resemblance to renosterbos (Elytropap-
pus rhinocerotis) . Both species have minute, adpressed,
scale-like leaves covered in subsessile glands with over-
lying arachnoid hairs. Although leaf morphology in ster-
ile specimens can easily lead to wrong identifications,
the distinct differences in the capitula and cypsela struc-
tures can clearly identify both species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is part of a series emanating from a Ph.D.
study on the Metalasia group genera that was super-
vised by Prof. B-E. van Wyk of the University of Johan-
nesburg. I thank Dr N.M. Shiyan, Head Curator of the
National Herbarium of Ukraine (KW) for confirmation
(image and metadata) of the existence of the type speci-
men of Helichrysum aretioides in her herbarium, and to
Dr O.A. Leistner for valuable editorial comments.
REFERENCES
ANDERBERG, A. 1991. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribe
Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). Opera Botanica 104: 53.
BENTHAM, G. 1873. Compositae. In G.Bentham & J.D. Hooker, Gen-
era plantarum 2,1 : 163-533. London.
BOKHAR1, M.H. & WENDELBO, P. 1985. Anatomy of Dionysia II:
xeromorphic features. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden
Edinburgh 42: 327-345.
DRUCE, G.C. 1917. Nomenclatorial notes: chiefly African and Austral-
ian. Second supplement to Botanical Society & Exchange Club
of the British Isles, Report for 1916 , vol. 4: 601-653.
HARVEY, W.H. 1863. Biyomorphe zeyheri . Thesaurus capensis 2: 33.
Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
HARVEY, W.H. 1865. Compositae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder,
Flora capensis 3, edn 1. Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
HERMAN, P.P.J., RETIEF, E„ KOEKEMOER, M. & WELMAN, W.G.
2000. Asteraceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of southern Afri-
ca: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 127, 134. National Botani-
cal Institute, Pretoria.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1981. Some generic concepts in
Compositae-Gnaphaliinae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 82: 181-232.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index Herbariorum, part 1 : the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden.
JACKSON, W.P.U. 1990. Origins and meanings of names of South
African plant genera. University of Cape Town Ecolab, Botany
Department, Rondebosch.
KLOPPER, R.R., CHATELAIN, C„ BANNINGER, V., HABASHI, C.,
STEYN, H.M., DE WET, B.C., ARNOLD, T.H., GAUTIER, L„
SMITH, G.F. & SPICHIGER, R. 2006. Checklist of the flower-
ing plants of sub-Saharan Africa. An index of accepted names
and synonyms. South African Botanical Diversity Network
Report No. 42. SABONET, Pretoria.
KOEKEMOER, M. 2002. Systematics of the Metalasia group in the
Relhaniinae (Asteraceae-Gnaphalieae). Ph.D. thesis, Rand
Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.
LAMARCK, J.P.B.A.P.M. DE. 1789. Encyclopedic methodique. Bota-
nique 3: 1-360. Paris.
LAMARCK, J.P.B.A.P.M. DE. 1823. Tableau encyclopedique et
Methodique 5: t. 693, f. 2.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1942. Some changes in nomenclature III. Biyomorphe.
Journal of South African Botany 8: 282, 283.
PATERSON-JONES, C. 1997. The Cape Floral Kingdom. New Hol-
land, Cape Town.
PERSOON, C.H. 1807. Synopsis plantarum 2. Cramer, Paris.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants,
edn 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Simvey of South Africa No. 25.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
SCHULTZ BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1843. Compositae. In W.G. Walpers,
Repertorium botanices systematicae 2: 973. Friderici Hofmei-
ster, Leipzig.
SCHULTZ BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1845. Uber die Gattung Gnaphalium.
Botanische Zeitung 3: 169.
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1986. Taxonomic literature, vol. 6,
Sti-Vuy, edn 2. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht / Antwer-
pen.
SWEET, R. 1 826. Sweet s Hortus Britanicus / The British Flower Gar-
den 1: 223. Ridgeway, London.
THUNBERG, C.P 1800. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis. Stuttgart, Cotta.
TURCZANINOW, N.S. 1851. Synanthereae quaedam hucusque inde-
scriptae. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes de
Moscou 24,2: 59-95.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1803. Caroli a Linne species plantarum 3,3, edn
4. Berlin.
ZALENSKY, O.V. 1948. About the thermal and hydric regime of cush-
ion plants. Botaniceskij Zurnal SSSR. 33: 571-581.
M. KOEKEMOER*
* National Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2010-03-25.
Bothalia 41,2: 327-339 (2011)
Phytosociological description of norite koppies in the Rustenburg
area, North-West Province and refinement of the distribution of the
Norite Koppies Bushveld on the national vegetation classification
map of South Africa
A.J.H. LAMPRECHT*, S.S. CILLIERS*, A.R. GOTZE** and M.J. DU TOIT*
Keywords: Braun-Blanquet method, conservation. Norite Koppies Bushveld, phytosociology, Rustenburg, South Africa, vegetation map
ABSTRACT
The Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type boasts a distinctive and contrasting topography and species composition
easily distinguished from that of surrounding areas. A phytosociological study was done on the leased mining area of the
Impala Platinum Mining Company north of Rustenburg in the North-West Province. Similar norite koppies, situated west of
the Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation, and not yet mapped by Mucina & Rutherford (2006), were identified in the study
area and phytosociologically described. Six plant communities and two subcommunities were identified. Multivariate sta-
tistical analyses (correspondence analyses) confirmed that the species composition of these areas corresponds with and does
therefore form part of the Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type as described by Mucina & Rutherford (2006). Some of
these communities contain Boscia albitrunca, a protected plant species, and should therefore be considered as areas with
conservation value.
INTRODUCTION
The Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type (Mu-
cina & Rutherford 2006) extends from Rustenburg in
the west to Pretoria in the east and forms part of the
Savanna Biome of South Africa. It consists of rocky
hills that are embedded and isolated in Marikana Thorn-
veld (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). The underlying geol-
ogy is predominantly gabbro and norite with layered
anorthosite of the Pyramid Gabbro-Norite, Rustenburg
Layered Suite (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). Soils are
mainly shallow and well drained. Percentage soil sur-
face rockiness is high with rock size varying from small
rocks to large boulders and sheet rock. The vegetation
is characterized by low, semi-open to closed woodland
with the woody component reaching heights of up to
5 m (Van der Meulen 1979). A dense layer of decidu-
ous shrubs and trees is found with sparse undergrowth
(Mucina & Rutherford 2006). The species composition
of the norite koppies differs considerably from that of
the surrounding thomveld. Norite koppies support high
levels of biodiversity as well as the protected species
Boscia albitrunca (SANBI 2009). Although this veg-
etation type is categorized as Least Threatened, based
on remotely sensed data, ground truthing has suggested
that these areas are in fact rather susceptible to distur-
bance (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). According to recent
assessments, approximately 20 % of the koppies have
been transformed mainly due to mining activities and
urbanization of surrounding land (Mucina & Ruther-
ford 2006). Thus, transformation has taken place largely
around the fringes of these units. Most mining activities
on these koppies are granite quarries which cause mas-
sive damage to the vegetation. The conservation of the
* School for Environmental Science and Development. North West Uni-
versity, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
** Environment Research Consulting, P.O.Box 20640 Noordbrug
2522, South Africa.
MS. received: 2010-06-09
natural biodiversity of the norite koppies is therefore a
matter of concern.
Granite mining in the North-West Province contrib-
utes 46 % of the national mining of granite (North-West
Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environ-
ment 2010). This style of opencast mining poses vari-
ous threats to biodiversity. These activities are respon-
sible for the pollution and large-scale consumption of
environmental resources (North-West Department of
Agriculture, Conservation and Environment 2010).
Significant changes in land use, population dynam-
ics and community distribution take place as a result of
the concentration and location of the mineral reserves
and mines in the province (North-West Department of
Agriculture, Conservation and Environment 2010). Air
pollution and pollution of surface water from opencast
granite mining are important threats to the environment
(North-West Department of Agriculture, Conservation
and Environment 2010). The pollution can also spread
much further than the initial area of impact by means
of streams and dams that transport pollutants and cause
exchange between surface and ground water sources.
Dust from opencast mines and pollutants from the trans-
portation and processing of minerals are major sources
of air pollution which also pose a threat to natural bio-
diversity.
The aim of this paper is to provide more detailed phy-
tosociological information on the Norite Koppies Bush-
veld vegetation type than previously described by Van
der Meulen (1979) and Mucina & Rutherford (2006). It
also provides geo-referenced information on the exist-
ence of many smaller, isolated norite koppies west of
those already described. According to the North-West
Spatial Development Framework and Zoning Plan, dol-
omite and norite koppies are proposed protection sites,
and it was further proposed that no development should
occur on ridges with a slope of more than 5° in the
North-West Province (Maxim Planning Solutions 2004).
328
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
The new geo-referenced information provided by this
study will enable the refining of the national vegetation
classification map (Mucina & Rutherford 2006) and will
consequently aid in the improved conservation of the
unique vegetation found on norite koppies in the North-
West Province.
STUDY AREA
The study was undertaken in the licensed operating
area of the Impala Platinum Mining Company (Figure
1) with the intent of developing a conservation plan for
the leased mining area. It is situated 10 km northwest of
Rustenburg in the North-West Province. The area covers
± 29 334 ha.
The Rustenburg area falls in the Savanna Biome, the
largest biome in South Africa. The savannas of southern
Africa are found in the region of high summer rainfall
and winter drought (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). Alti-
tudes range from near sea level to 2000 m. The mean
daily maximum temperature for February is rarely under
26°C and daily temperatures often exceed 32°C. The
mean daily temperature remains above 10°C in most
of the biome during July but on the highveld (south-
ern edge) temperatures can drop below 0°C (Mucina
& Rutherford 2006). Frost is uncommon in winter, but
does occur between June and August. Outside the Kala-
hari areas, most of the Savanna has an annual rainfall of
500-750 mm (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). The entire
study area includes four vegetation types (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006). The largest part of the area is covered
by the Zeerust and Marikana Thomveld. A small part in
the northeastern corner of the site falls inside the Cen-
tral Sandy Bushveld vegetation type. A number of norite
koppies are present in the lower southeast corner con-
stituting the Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type
(Figure 2).
METHODS
The Braun-Blanquet vegetation sampling approach
(Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974) was used.
Homogenous units based on physiognomy and spe-
cies composition were identified on the norite koppies
through visual observations and aerial photography.
Forty-three stratified random releves of 400 m2 were
surveyed on both previously mapped (Mucina & Ruther-
ford 2006) and newly mapped norite koppies. Species-
area curves were constructed to determine the minimal
area for a releve (Kent & Coker 2000). Environmental
characteristics (aspect, gradient, percentage soil surface
rockiness) and GPS co-ordinates were taken at each
releve.
The data collected were entered into the computer
database, TURBOVEG (Hennekens 1996a) and into
MEGATAB, a visual editor for phytosociological tables
(Hennekens 1996b). TWINSPAN was used as a first
approximation to construct phytosociological tables and
Braun-Blanquet procedures were followed for refine-
ment. Subsequent multivariate analyses were performed
with the computer programme CANOCO (Ter Braak
1986) to verify the communities and identify possible
environmental gradients that could influence commu-
nity structure and composition. The communities found
on the newly mapped norite koppies were also compared
to the norite koppies previously mapped by means of a
Correspondence Analysis (CA) ordination in CANOCO.
The releve numbers of newly mapped koppies appear
in bold in the phytosociological table to distinguish
them from the previously mapped koppies by Mucina
& Rutherford (2006). Mapping of the newly identified
norite koppies was done in ArcView 9.2 (ESRI 2006).
The plant communities were named by combin-
ing a differential and dominant species name and then
described. In the description of the first community,
however, the names of two differential species were
FIGURE I . — Map of study area in South Africa.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
329
Legend
B Additional Norite koppies bushveld Norite Koppies Bushveld Mankana Thornveld
□ Study area g< Moot Plains Bushveld Zeerust Thornveld
gj Pilanesberg Mountain Bushveld Central Sandy Bushveld
Gold Reef Mountain Bushveld
27°20'E
27°4’E
27°12'E
27°20'F.
27°4'E
27s 1 2’F.
FIGURE 2. — A, map of study area and vegetation types; B, an enlarged illustration of additionally mapped norite koppies.
used instead of combining one name with the name of
the dominant species.
Species names are according to Germishuizen et al.
(2006).
Boscia albitrunca , found in certain described com-
munities, is protected in South Africa (SANBI 2009)
and was listed. Declared weeds and invaders (Henderson
2001) were also listed. These plant species are grouped
into three categories according to the Conservation
of Agriculture Resources Act, 1983 (Act 43 of 1983)
(quoted by Henderson 2001).
RESULTS
Plant communities
Four plant communities including two subcommuni-
ties were identified, described and mapped in the norite
koppies on the leased mining area of Impala Platinum.
The Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type, as classi-
fied by Mucina & Rutherford (2006) was first described
by Van der Meulen (1979) as a Croton gratissimus-
Setaria lindenbergiana Woodland Association and also
by Panagos (1996) as a Clerodendrum glabrum-Setaria
lindenbergiana Short Closed Woodland Community.
The study conducted at Impala Platinum provides data
to enable the refining of the broad community described
by Van der Meulen in 1979. The following communities
were identified and are indicated in a phytosociologi-
cal table (Appendix). Maytenus undata and Maytenus
albata were not distinguished at the time of the sur-
vey but it has since come to our attention that both are
present in the study area. They are therefore listed as one
species. An additional list of other species which do not
fall into any differential species groups was left out of
the phytosociological table for logistic reasons. For any
enquiries about these species the first author can be con-
tacted.
1 . Sporobolus stapfianus-Microchloa caffra Community
This community is present on rocky, dome-shaped
outcrops appearing on koppies and also on areas of
exposed sheet rock found in the thornveld between the
koppies. The soil is shallow and the percentage soil
surface rockiness is very high, varying between 70 %
and 90 %. The degree of surface rock fragmentation
can vary considerably. The species composition differs
slightly between fragmented outcrops and more solid
ones because fragmented surface rock areas form deeper
cracks and therefore create a different habitat with
deeper soil and more water penetration for certain spe-
cies to exploit.
Differential species are indicated by Species Group
A. They include the grasses Sporobolus stapfianus
and Oropetium capense as well as the fern Selaginella
dregei. The dominant species is the grass Heteropogon
contortus (Species Group K) and other species include
the grass Melinis repens (Species Group F), the tree
Sclerocarya birrea (Species Group F) and the forb Chas-
canum hederaceum (Species Group B). The grass spe-
cies Hyperthelia dissoluta and Schizachyrium sangui-
neum (both in Species Group A) are two species which
can be associated with outcrops that have more frag-
mented rock surfaces. These species exclusively utilize
330
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
the micro-habitat created by the high degree of rock
fragmentation and are not present on areas of solid sheet
rock.
Protected species: Boscia albitrunca (SANBI 2009).
Declared weeds and invaders: Opuntia ficus-indica
and Pennisetum setaceum (both in category 1) (Hender-
son 2001).
The average species richness is 55 species per releve
of which 5 % are alien species. The grass layer is the
dominant stratum in this community (31 % cover). It
consists mostly of low-growing species with an average
height of 0.3 m but in areas of high rock fragmentation
certain species can reach 2 m. Shrubs and trees are less
prominent (15 % cover) and the height of the woody
component varies from small shrubs (0.3 m) to taller
trees of up to 5 m that grow mostly on the edges of these
outcrops. The forb layer only covers 9 % of the area and
consists mostly of very low growing species although
some can be up to 2.2 m high.
2. Pappea capensis-Heteropogon contortus Community
This community is found on north-facing mid-slopes.
The slopes of these areas can vary from 10° to 30° and
the percentage soil surface rockiness does not exceed 60
%, which is relatively low compared to the Ficus abu-
tilifolia-Croton gratissimus Community which is also
found on north-facing slopes.
No differential species are found in this community.
The community shares species with the Sporobolus stap-
fianus-Microchloa caffra (Species Group B) and Set aria
lindenbergiana-Acacia caffra Communities (Species
Group G). The absence of the differential species of the
Setaria lindenbergiana-Acacia caffra Community (Spe-
cies Group C), which are found on south-facing slopes,
characterizes this community. This phenomenon indi-
cates that all differential species found on northern mid-
slopes also occur on south-facing slopes. There is, how-
ever, a group of differential species present on southern
slopes which is not found on north-facing slopes (Spe-
cies Group C). Thus, this community found on northern
mid-slopes is not characterized by the presence of a cer-
tain species group but rather by the absence of the differ-
ential species group of the south-facing slopes (Species
Group C). The dominant species is the grass Hetero-
pogon contortus (Species Group K), and other species
include the trees Sclerocary>a birrea (Species Group F)
and Croton gratissimus (Species Group J), as well as the
shrub Pouzolzia mixta (Species Group K).
Protected species: Boscia albitrunca (SANBI 2009).
Declared weeds and invaders: Achyranthes aspera
(category 1 ) (Henderson 2001 ).
The average species richness is 60 species per releve
of which 6 % are alien species. The woody and grass
layers cover nearly 90 % and are the two dominant strata
in this community. Various small shrubs are present but
tall trees of up to 7 m high are more prominent while
the grass layer found under the tree canopy is mostly
low but can reach 2 m in height. The forb layer is not as
prominent as the other strata ( 10 % cover) and consists
mostly of small forbs but also some climbers that can
grow high into trees (up to 2 m).
3. Setaria lindenbergiana-Dombeya rotundifolia Com-
munity
This community is found on south-facing slopes but
the aspect may vary from west to southeast. Soils are
mostly shallow but can be deeper in some places and
the percentage soil surface rockiness varies considerably
(from 40 % to 90 %).
Differential species are indicated by Species Group
C which includes the grass Setaria lindenbergiana, the
tree Celtis africana and the forb Scadoxus puniceus,
while the dominant species is the tree Dombeya rotundi-
folia (Species Group J). Other species include the grass
Themeda triandra, the shrub Euclea crispa and Acacia
caffra as a tree and a shrub (all in Species Group D).
Declared weeds and invaders: Achyranthes aspera,
Cestrum laevigatum, Datura stramonium, Opuntia ficus-
indica (all in category 1), Cynodon dactylon (proposed
category 2), Ipomoea purpurea (category 3) (Henderson
2001).
The average species richness is 40 species per releve
of which 8 % are alien species. The woody layer found
on the south-facing slopes is very dense (64 % cover)
and consists mostly of tall trees with an average height
of 5 m and some that even reach up to 10 m in height.
Shrubs only make up ± 15 % of the woody layer. The
grass layer rarely exceeds 1.5 m in height and covers 30
% whereas the forb layer only covers 19 %. The forbs
present in this community are mostly small, low-grow-
ing species and also climber species which can reach up
to 4 m into trees.
This community, found on the south-facing slopes,
can be divided into two subcommunities based on the
difference in percentage soil surface rockiness.
3. 1 Themeda triandra-Acacia caffra Subcommunity
This is the dominant subcommunity found on the
southern slopes of koppies. It is present in areas that
have a relatively low percentage soil surface rockiness
(40-65 %) in comparison with the other subcommunity.
This is the distinguishing environmental factor between
the two subcommunities found on south-facing slopes.
Soils are mostly shallow but can be deeper in some
areas.
Differential species are indicated by Species Group
D which includes the grass Themeda triandra, the shrub
Euclea crispa and the forb Lantana rugosa. The domi-
nant species is Acacia caffra (Species Group D) as a tree
and a shrub. Other species in this subcommunity include
the shrub Asparagus suaveolens (Species Group F), the
tree Dombeya rotundifolia (Species Group J) and the
fern Pellaea calomelanos (Species Group K).
Declared weeds and invaders: Achyranthes aspera,
Cestrum laevigatum, Datura stramonium, Opuntia ficus-
indica (all in category 1), Cynodon dactylon (proposed
category 2), Ipomoea purpurea (category 3) (Henderson
2001).
The average species richness is 44 species per releve
of which 4 % are alien species. A dense, woody stratum
is present in this subcommunity (63 %) of which 47 % is
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
331
low to taller trees (up to 7 m) and the rest is shrubs. The
grass layer is well developed (48 %) but consists mostly
of low-growing grasses rarely higher than 1.5 m. Forbs
cover only 1 1 % of the area and some species can climb
up to 4 m into trees. The reason for the low cover and
vigorous climbing is a shortage of space and effective
sunlight because of high grass and tree cover.
3.2 Ficus burkei-Dombeya rotundifolia Subcommunity
This subcommunity is characterized by steep, rocky
cliffs with an aspect that can vary from west to south-
east. It is located in areas with slopes of ± 35° and
higher. The percentage soil surface rockiness is very
high, varying between 65 % and 90 % and consists
mostly of large, solid boulders. As mentioned in the
description of the first subcommunity, this large percent-
age of rock cover is the distinguishing factor between
the two subcommunities. Soils are very shallow.
Differential species are indicated by Species Group E
and they include the tree Ficus burkei, the forb Pavetta
eylesii and the grass Digitaria sanguinalis. The domi-
nant species is the tree Dombeva rotundifolia (Species
Group J), while other species include the forbs Solamun
panduriforme (Species Group G), Pupalia lappacea
(Species Group C) and Abutilon austro-africanum (Spe-
cies Group I).
Declared weeds and invaders: Achyranthes aspera
(category 1) (Henderson 2001).
The average species richness is 35 species per releve
of which 1 1 % are alien species. Trees which grow up to
10 m in height dominate this community (50 % cover)
whereas the shrub layer only covers 15 % and does not
grow higher than 1.8 m. A grass layer is nearly absent
in this community (5 % cover) because of a short-
age of soil and sunlight. The grass species found here
do not grow over 0.8 m in height. Various small forbs
and climbers are found in this community (28 % cover)
which can reach heights of up to 4 m into trees.
4. Ficus abutilifolia-Croton gratissimus Community
This community is characterized by steep, rocky cliffs
facing north or northeast. It is located in areas with very
steep slopes varying from 30° to 90°. The percentage soil
surface rockiness is very high, varying between 60 % and
90 %, and consists mostly of large boulders. As men-
tioned in the discussion of the Pappea capensis-Hetero-
pogon contortus Community, the difference in percent-
age soil surface rockiness is what distinguishes these two
communities found on the north-facing slopes of kop-
pies. Little soil is present because of the large amount of
rock and the very shallow soil found in this community.
Differential species are indicated by Species Group
H which includes the trees Ficus abutilifolia and Obe-
tia tenax and the grass Enteropogort macrostachyus. The
dominant species is the tree Croton gratissimus (Species
Group J). Other species include the forbs Abutilon aus-
tro-africanum (Species Group I), Hibiscus subreniformis
and Cyphostemma sulcatum (both in Species Group J).
Declared weeds and invaders: Datura stramonium
and Opuntia ficus-indica (both in category 1) (Hender-
son 2001).
The average species richness is relatively low with 25
species per releve of which 4 % are alien species. This
community is totally dominated by the woody compo-
nent (67 %). Most of the woody stratum consists of tall
trees that can reach 8 m in height. Because of the lack
of sufficient soil and adequate sunlight, the grass cover
is only 28 % and grasses are never higher than 1.2 m.
Only small forbs that rarely grow over 1 .2 m are present
in this community and their cover does not exceed 9 %.
DISCUSSION
The four plant communities and two subcommuni-
ties that were identified on norite koppies inside the
study area correspond with the Norite Koppies Bushveld
vegetation type as described and mapped by Mucina &
Rutherford (2006). A multivariate statistical compari-
son done between the communities of the previously
mapped koppies and those newly mapped in this study
shows a similar species composition. An ordination fol-
lowing correspondence analyses (CA) (Figure 3) was
done to illustrate the correlation in species composition
between the different communities.
A representative number of the newly mapped kop-
pies were phytosociologically sampled and described to
test the correlation in species composition between these
koppies and the ones mapped by Mucina & Rutherford
in 2006 as the Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation type.
FIGURE 3. — Correspondence Analysis ordination of communities
identified; Community 1, ■; Community 2, •; Subcommunity
3.1, A; Subcommunity 3.2, X; Community 4, O.
332
Bothalia 41 ,2 (2011)
The releves representing Community 1 formed a
close grouping indicating the strong correlation in spe-
cies composition between the different releves. Commu-
nity 1 is therefore similar for both the existing mapped
koppies and the newly mapped koppies. This indicates
that these additional koppies also form part of the Norite
Koppies Bushveld vegetation type.
The releves representing Community 2 also formed
a grouping indicating the similarity in species compo-
sition between the different releves. The overlapping of
certain releves between this community and Subcommu-
nity 3.1 in the ordination supports our argument that this
community found on the northern slopes shares various
species with Subcommunity 3.1 found on south-facing
slopes. The absence of certain species from Community
2 that are found in Subcommunity 3.1 is, however, what
separates these two communities.
The releves representing Subcommunity 3.1 formed a
separate, larger grouping, indicating a lesser correlation
in species composition compared to the correlations of
the other communities. The grouping of Subcommunity
3.1 was, however, still distinct from the other commu-
nities. As with Community 1, the presence of the com-
munity on previously mapped, as well as on the newly
mapped koppies indicates that these new koppies also
form part of the Norite Koppies Bushveld vegetation
type.
The releves representing Subcommunity 3.2 group
together. Once again this indicates a correlation in spe-
cies composition between the different releves. The
presence of this community on both the mapped and
unmapped koppies supports the argument that the
unmapped koppies form part of the Norite Koppies
Bushveld vegetation type.
The same is true for Community 4.
CONCLUSION
The plant communities identified and described on
the newly mapped norite koppies on the leased min-
ing area of the Impala Platinum Company correspond
with the Norite Koppies Bushveld described by Mucina
& Rutherford (2006). However, the new communities
described in this paper offer a more refined descrip-
tion of the phytosociology of the Norite Koppies Bush-
veld than the broad description of Mucina & Ruther-
ford (2006). Consequently, these new koppies can be
spatially included on the vegetation map (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006) to refine the map and increase the veg-
etation data available on the Norite Koppies Bushveld
vegetation type (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). Norite
koppies were also mapped in the Zeerust Thornveld,
whereas Mucina & Rutherford (2006) only described
norite koppies in the Marikana Thornveld. The unique
species composition found in the Norite Koppies Bush-
veld (Mucina & Rutherford 2006) has significant conser-
vation importance. For this reason it is proposed by the
North-West Spatial Development Framework and Zon-
ing Plan that norite koppies should be protected from
development in the North-West Province (Maxim Plan-
ning Solutions 2004). The addition of this new informa-
tion for the geographic extension of the Norite Koppies
Bushveld (Mucina & Rutherford 2006) further to the
west will aid in the conservation of norite koppies and
the plant communities they represent.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to offer our sincerest thanks to the
following people for their assistance and contribu-
tions. Field work: Prof. S. Siebert, Ms S. Kiirzweg and
P. Ayres; species identification: Prof. S. Siebert and Ms
S. Kiirzweg; multivariate statistic analyses: Miss M. la
Grange.
REFERENCES
ESRI (ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE).
2006. ArcView 9.2. www.esri.com. Redlands, CA, USA.
GERMISHUIZEN, G„ MEYER, N.L., STEENKAMP, Y. & KEITH,
M. (eds). 2006. A checklist of South African plants. Southern
African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 41. SABO-
NET, Pretoria.
HENDERSON, L. 2001. Alien weeds and invasive plants: a complete
guide to declared weeds and invaders in South Africa. Plant
Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Council,
Pretoria.
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996a. TURBOVEG: software package for input,
processing and presentation of phytosociological data. IBN-
DLO, University of Lancaster.
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996b. MEGATAB: a visual editor for phytosocio-
logical tables. Giesen & Gertus, Ulft.
KENT, M. & COKER, P. 2000. Vegetation description and analysis: a
practical approach. Wiley, New York.
MAXIM PLANNING SOLUTIONS. 2004. North-West Spatial Devel-
opment Framework and Zoning Plan, vol. 4: 93.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and meth-
ods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.
NORTH-WEST DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION
AND ENVIRONMENT. 2010. North-West Province, Environmental
outlook: a report on the state of the environment 2008. http://www.
nwpg.gov.za/Agriculture/NW_ENVIRONMENTAL_OUTLOOK/
index.asp (accessed: 11 February 2010).
PANAGOS, M.D. 1996. The natural plant communities of the Onder-
stepoort Nature Reserve. Unpublished Report, Agricultural
Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute,
Pretoria.
SANBI (SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTI-
TUTE). 2009. Protected plants and plant permits in South Africa.
http://www.sanbi.org/frames/tspfram.htm (accessed: 19 October
2009).
TER BRAAK, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new
eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis.
Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
VAN DER MEULEN, F. 1979. Plant sociology’ of the western Trans-
vaal bushveld, South Africa: a syntaxonomic and synecological
study. Gantner, Vaduz.
APPENDIX.- Phytosociological table ofNorite koppies
Bothalia41,2 (2011)
333
APPENDIX. — Phytosociological table ofNorite koppies. * indicates an alien species (cont.)
334
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
APPENDIX. — Phytosociological table of Norite koppies. * indicates an alien species (cont.)
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
335
APPENDIX. — Phytosociological table of Norite koppies. * indicates an alien species (cont.)
336
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
APPENDIX. — Phytosoeiological table of Norite koppies. * indicates an alien species (cont.)
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
337
APPENDIX. — Phytosociological table of Norite koppies. * indicates an alien species (cont.)
338
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
APPENDIX. — Phytosociological tabic of Norite koppies (cont.)
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
339
indicates an alien species.
Bothalia 41,2: 341-350(2011)
The extended occurrence of Maputaland Woody Grassland further
south in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
S.J. SIEBERT*, F. SIEBERT* and M.J. DU TOIT*
Keywords: coastal dunes, endemism, geoxylic sutdrutex, Kwambonambi Hygrophilous Grassland, Richards Bay, vegetation mapping
ABSTRACT
The distinctiveness of Maputaland Woody Grassland lies within its richness of geoxylic suffrutices and herbaceous flora.
Since it is well documented in the literature and easy to distinguish from other grassland types, it was possible to confirm a
locality of this unique vegetation unit west of Richards Bay, where it probably forms the southernmost outlier population of
this vegetation unit in the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome. Phytosociological data obtained from the study area were ana-
lysed to identify plant communities and subsequent mapping units. Floristic gradients obtained through ordination techniques
revealed the relationship that exists between the Woody Grassland of the study area and the Maputaland Woody Grassland
of Sileza Nature Reserve. This confirms the occurrence of Maputaland Woody Grassland at Richards Bay. Two of the plant
communities identified from the Richards Bay site are distinctively different, despite previously being lumped together by
different authorities as either Kwambonambi Grassland or Maputaland Woody Grassland.
INTRODUCTION
Maputaland Wooded Grassland also known as
Maputaland (MWG) (Matthews et al. 1999) and the
name which we prefer to use, is a vegetation unit (CB2)
of the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006), and is limited to the Maputaland Cen-
tre of Endemism that is found along the coastal plain
of northern KwaZulu-Natal and southern Mozambique
(Van Wyk & Smith 2001). The ‘woody grasslands of
Maputaland’ (Myre 1964), or ‘the underground forests
of Africa’ as described by White (1977), are character-
ized by the many geoxylic (often rhizomatous) suf-
frutices that occur there. Geoxylic suffrutices, often
referred to as ‘underground’ or ‘stunted’ trees, are dwarf
woody plants with annual or short-lived woody shoots
sprouting from massive or extensive woody, perennial,
underground axes (White 1977). Common examples of
geoxylic suffrutices that occur in the woody grasslands
of Maputaland are Ancylobotiys petersiana , Diospyros
galpinii, Elephantorrhiza elephantina, Eugenia alban-
ensis, E. capensis, Maytenus nemorosa. Pachystigma
venosum , Parinari capensis subsp. incohata and Sola-
tia krausii. MWG is also rich in plant species that are
endemic to the Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany hotspot,
one of the eight most important biodiversity regions in
Africa (Steenkamp et al. 2005). A biodiversity hotspot
is a region of significant biological richness and a high
level of endemism which is threatened with destruction.
According to the Mucina & Rutherford (2006) map,
the area west of Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, is situ-
ated within the Maputaland Coastal Belt vegetation unit
(CB1). The main aim of this account is to provide evi-
dence of the occurrence of an outlying patch of MWG
from this area, approximately 10 km southwest of its cur-
rently mapped southern distribution limit. MWG is not
known to extend south of the Swamp Forests on the east-
ern side of Lake Mzingazi (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).
It is necessary for this new locality to be officially recog-
* School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West
University, Private Bag X6001, 2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa.
MS. received: 2010-02-10.
nised as of conservation importance and mapped, as it is
part of the less than 10 % extent of this vegetation unit
that has not been transformed in the south (Mucina &
Rutherford 2006). Maddock & Benn (2000) highlighted
the importance of re-assessing conservation-worthy
areas of Zululand at a finer land-parcel scale, especially
vegetation types not sufficiently protected by provincial
authorities. Quantification is therefore required for the
grassland of the study area to qualify as MWG before
being considered as of conservation importance. Hence,
the objectives of the study were 1, to document the flor-
istic composition of this patch of MWG in the context
of the surrounding vegetation; 2, compare its plant spe-
cies composition with that of typical MWG as defined
by Matthews et al. ( 1999) for Sileza Nature Reserve and
other locally co-occurring grassland types of the Maputa-
land (CB1) and KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belts (CB3); and
3, to map its new locality.
STUDY AREA
The study area comprises 873 hectares (8.73 km2) of
land west of Richards Bay, north of the John Ross Park-
way (Highway) that connects the former with Empan-
geni (Figure 1). The precise locality is between latitude
28°45'36"S and 28°46'51"S, and longitude 31°58'14"E
and 32°00'39"E. The terrain is slightly undulating. Geo-
logically it consists of Cretaceous to Recent marine sedi-
ments, with shallow littoral and coastal dune deposits
(Botha 1997). Mean height is 26 m a.s.l., with the high-
est points at ± 35 m and the lowest at 1 1 m. The area
is drained by a network of interdune depressions that
feed into numerous perennial pans just beyond the west-
ern and southern boundaries of the study area. Richards
Bay lies in the subtropical zone of South Africa, with the
mean annual rainfall > 1 000 mm and the mean annual
temperature ± 21 ,5°C (Schultze 1982).
METHODS
Stratification of the study area was based on 1:50 000
stereo aerial photographs and topographical position
342
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
using terrain types such as dune crests and interdune
depressions. Releves were compiled in 15 randomly
placed sample plots within the study area. Five plots
were placed in each of the three stratified homogeneous
units. Cultivated and built up areas were excluded from
the survey. For comparative purposes with Matthews et
al. (1999), plot sizes were fixed at 100 m2 (10 x 10 m).
Within each sample plot, total floristic composition was
recorded and a cover-abundance value assigned to each
species according to the Braun-Blanquet scale (modified
from Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974).
Braun-Blanquet procedures were used to refine the
classification results of the TWINSPAN (Hill 1979)
application using the MEGATAB computer programme
(Hennekens 1996) and are presented in a phytosocio-
logical table (Table 1 ). The plant community names are
derived from the names of the two most dominant spe-
cies along with the prevailing vegetation structure or
diagnostic growth form. Dominant alien species were
not considered in the naming process as these taxa might
in future be successfully removed from the plant com-
munity. Results from the classification and subsequent
refinement were used to construct a 1:15 000 vegetation
map for the study area (Figure 2). Mapping was done at
plant community level in ArcMap™ of the Esri ArcGIS
9. 1 11 computer package (ESRI 2006).
Floristic plot data from the study site and Sileza
Nature Reserve, and the bordering KwaZulu-Natal
Coastal Belt vegetation unit, were subjected to PRIMER
(Clarke & Gorley 2001) to elucidate species turnover
(spatial floristic change). This multivariate analyses
technique represents a complex data matrix (samples
and species) in a visual dimensional space, allowing
for the assumption that plots clustered closer together
resemble similar floristic composition. The derived ordi-
nation therefore represents the distance between each
plot in rank order with their difference in species com-
position as determined by the dissimilarity coefficient
(Williams 2005).
Average height (m) and canopy cover (%) of the tree,
shrub and herbaceous layers were noted, and a mean
value was calculated for each layer in each community.
Environmental data recorded included aspect, altitude,
slope, soil type, soil depth, terrain type, and rockiness
of the soil surface (Table 2). Names of taxa and growth
forms conform to Germishuizen et al. (2006). Some spe-
cies, such as geophytes, especially the Orchidaceae and
species of the Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae) could not
be identified below genus level. Threatened species were
identified from Scott-Shaw (1999), and updated with the
latest re-assessments of the South African Red Data List
(Raimondo et al. 2009).
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
343
TABLE 1. Phytosociological table of 15 plots sampled from study area at Richards Bay, including 65 of 227 recorded species; 29 % of study
area’s flora
Species group B: Trichilia emetica-Panicum maximum Woodland Mosaic
Species group C
344
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
Species group E
*, introduced alien (exotic) species (Henderson 2006); •, typical, frequently occurring Maputaland Woody Grassland species (Mucina & Rutherford
2006). Braun-Blanquet scale adapted and modified from Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg (1974): R, rare, only one individual recorded; +, > 1
individual, total cover of 1 %; 1, > 1 individual, total cover of 2-5 %; 2A, abundant, total cover of 6-12 %; 2B, abundant, total cover of 13-18
%; 3, abundant, total cover of 19-25 %.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Classification
Three plant communities were identified, classi-
fied, described and mapped. Boundaries are not pre-
cise, but follow broad patterns. Especially the bounda-
ries between Woody Grassland (plant community 1)
and Hygrophilous Grassland (plant community 2) are
obscure due to the mosaic nature of the vegetation.
The vegetation structure of these plant communi-
ties can be described as open, rolling grassland with
scattered patches of mixed woodland and interspersed
with shallow seasonal wetlands. All the plant communi-
ties are dependent on specific environmental gradients
that are determined by soil type, moisture regime and
past land use. Higher-lying grassland is characterized
by geoxylic suffrutices. Hygrophilous grassland occurs
along most interdune depressions. Indigenous and alien
trees became established within remnants of old planta-
tions and wet, disturbed sites. An ordination of the flo-
ristic data set of 15 plots (227 species) revealed three
distinct assemblages of species or plant communities
in the study area (Figure 3): I, Parinari capensis-Digi-
taria natalensis Woody Grassland on crest of dunes; 2,
Trichilia emetica Panicum maximum Woodland Mosaic;
and 3, Ischaemum fasciculatum-Imperata cylindrica
Hygrophilous Grassland of interdune depressions.
Descriptions
The vegetation of the study area is characterized by
plant communities representing two major vegetation
units known as Maputaland Coastal Belt and MWG
(Mucina & Rutherford 2006). These are unique sys-
tems comprising their own species complement, which
have been shown to be determined by soil structure, soil
depth and past land use (Matthews et al. 1999; Siebert
el al. 2004). At local scales, such as the study site, vari-
ations in these environmental factors may result in many
different habitat types.
I . Parinari capensis-Digitaria natalensis Woody
Grassland on crest of dunes
This community is related to the Themedo-Salaci-
etum Woody Grassland (Myre 1964) and Maputaland
Wooded Grassland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).
Environmental data : locally this grassland type
occurs at an altitude of 30-34 m on the crests of dunes
(level slope of 1-3°). The soil is sandy, with bare
patches representing 10-25 % of sampled areas (Table
2). This Woody Grassland is prominent on the eastern
side of the study area, but its prominence fades towards
the western end, and when in close proximity to the
other two plant communities. Woody Grassland and
Hygrophilous Grassland of seasonally wet areas form
an intricate mosaic, difficult to map at such a fine scale
(Figure 2). Land use of this grassland is mainly grazing
by roving livestock and duiker. Human activities include
hunting with dogs and quad biking. The community also
does not extend south of the John Ross Parkway (High-
way), as in the west it is bordered by vast tracts of sugar
cane plantations, in the south by an extended wetland
system and in the southeast by a mine dump.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
345
TABLE 2. — Locality data, environmental factors and vegetation structure of each sample plot/plant community
Species data : species richness was high (Table 2),
ranging from 45 to 59 species/100 m2 (mean: 50). Forbs
are the most dominant growth form with 33 species, also
the most recorded for any community in the study area
(Figure 4). Trees are rare in this grassland, but where
present they have a mean cover of 1 0 % per sample plot
and are up to 5 m tall. The grass layer has a cover of
up to 70 % and the forb layer up to 30 %. Suffrutices
occur frequently, but was estimated to have a cover of
less than 10 %. The non-tree layer, which includes forbs,
grasses and geoxylic suffrutices has a mean height of 0.5
m.
I . 0 if b rsu
Legend
Alton Industrial Zone, Richards Bay Maputaiand Woody Grassland -L Woodland Mosaic
Kwambonambi Hygrophilous Grassland F I Subtropical Freshwater Wetlands Main Roads
1,500 Meters
3r5g’20'b
31 ‘ 59'40"E
32"0'0’£
32“0'20rh
FIGURE 2. — Vegetation map of study area.
346
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
A Richards ft
A Richards Bi
A Richards Be
Diagnostic species : the geoxylic suffrutices Diospy-
ros galpinii, Eugenia albanensis, Parinari capensis
and Salacia kraussii , the forbs Conostomium natalense,
Helichrysum kraussii , H. nudifolium , Hypoxis iridifo-
lia, Lobelia flaccida and Oxygonum robustum, and the
grasses Aristida junciformis, Dactyloctenium aegyptium
and Tristachya leucothrix (Table 1, species group A).
Species which are specifically shared with Wood-
land Mosaic include the trees Hyphaene coriacea and
Dichrostachys cinerea, and conspicuous forbs such
as Abrus precatorius, Asystasia gangetica and Smilax
anceps (Table 1, species group C). Frequently occurring
species shared with the other plant communities include
the shrub Chrysanthemoides monilifera, and the grass
Digitaria natalensis (Table 1, species group F), the lat-
ter which is also the most dominant species in this com-
munity. Invasive alien species that occur frequently on
dune crests are stunted forms of Lantana camara (Table
FIGURE 3. — Ordination of sam-
ple plots from study area in
Richards Bay, Sileza Nature
Reserve (Matthews et al.
1999), and Mtunzini (KwaZu-
lu-Natal Coastal Belt Grass-
land).
1, species group C) and Psidium guajava (Table 1, spe-
cies group F).
2. Trichilia emetica-Panicum maximum Woodland
Mosaic
Environmental data', this woodland occurs at a mean
altitude of 28-32 m above sea level on dunes (level slope
of I or 2°) and is usually in close proximity to depressions
where water accumulates (suggesting preference for higher
water tables). The soil is sandy, except for a man-made
embankment (supporting a road) of red clay that bisects
the western part of the study area. Bare patches generally
make up 5^)0 % of sampled areas (Table 2). The embank-
ment is the only habitat containing rocks. The Woodland
Mosaic is often on the edges of the study area forming
large, continuous clumps, which is interspersed by numer-
ous smaller, scattered patches. Large clumps are prob-
ably remnants of commercial Eucalyptus plantations that
/ m
□
□ED
Hygrophilous
A
Stress: 0.18
A
Woody
Grassland
A A-
A
A
• •
a v Woody Grassland ■ Sifeza Woody Grassland
jy Woodland Mosaic □ Sileza Hygrophilous Grassland
ly Hygrophilous Grassland # KwaZutu-Mata Bell Irassfand
□ Woody Grassland
□ Woodland Mosaic
■ Hygrophilious Grassland
Number of species
FIGURE 4. — No. species recorded
for each of growth forms
associated with plant commu-
nities of study area.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
347
are no longer managed. The smaller patches were natural
woodlands that have been invaded by alien trees, shrubs
and forbs. Land use of this woodland is mainly associated
with informal wood harvesting. The widely scattered plots
of this community on the ordination suggest a high beta-
diversity (Figure 3). This is probably because this commu-
nity includes invaded woodlands. Woody Grassland and
Hygrophilous Grassland, but the original plant communi-
ties here have been highly altered, resulting in a new com-
munity, the Woodland Mosaic.
Species data : species richness varies considerably
between 22 to 45 species/100 nr (mean: 37) (Table 2).
Although forbs are also conspicuous in this plant com-
munity, the Woodland Mosaic has the highest number of
tree (6) and shrub (6) species in the study area (Figure
4). Trees predominate in this woodland, reaching up to
1 1 m in height and on average cover ± 50 % per sample
plot (Table 2). The grass layer has a cover of up to 70 %
and the forb layer up to 20 %. The non-tree layer, which
includes forbs and grasses, has a mean height of 0.4 m.
Diagnostic species : the woody species Eugenia cap-
ensis, Searsia nebulosa and Trichilia emetica , the natu-
ralized weed Conyza canadensis , the forbs Cyperus
esculentus and Desmodium incanum , and the grasses
Melinis repens , Panicum maximum and Stenotaphrum
secundatum (Table 1, species group B).
Species commonly present, which are also shared
with Flygrophilous Grassland, include the forbs Cyper-
us solidus and Desmodium dregeanum , and the grass
Panicum dregeanum (Table 1. species group E). Species
found in Woodland Mosaic which are also present in
other plant communities include the tree Syzygium cor-
datum, the forb Centella asiatica and the fern Cheilan-
thes viridis (Table 1, species group F). Invasive alien
species that occur frequently in the woodlands are Chro-
molaena odorata , Eucalyptus grandis , which is locally
dominant, Lantana camara and Melia azederach.
3. Ischaemum fasciculatum—Imperata cylindrica Hy-
grophilous Grassland of interdune depressions
This community is related to the Ischaemum fascicu-
latum-Eragrostis inamoena Hygrophilous Grassland
(Matthews et al. 1999), Ischaemum fasciculatum-Cen-
tella asiatica Hygrophilous Grassland (Lubbe 1997),
Maputaland Coastal Belt in part (Mucina & Rutherford
2006) and Kwambonambi Hygrophilous Grasslands
(Goodman 2007).
Environmental data : this grassland type is associ-
ated with interdune depressions at an altitude of 23 to
28 m (slope of 1° or less). It comprises the drainage
lines of the study area that feed into a network of scat-
tered. small seasonal pans outside the study site. Many
of the drainage lines are invaded by alien woody spe-
cies and are classified as part of Woodland Mosaic (e.g.
plots 7 and 14). The soil is sandy, often humus-rich.
Bare patches are rare for most sample plots of inter-
dune depressions, but plot 1 1 has 30 % bare area (Table
2). The occurrence and abundance of Hygrophilous
Grassland is not surprising due to the proximity of the
study site to the vast Subtropical Freshwater Wetlands
(Mucina & Rutherford 2006) of Richards Bay.
Species data : species richness varies between 1 7 and
36 species/100 nr (mean: 25) (Table 2). Forbs occur
frequently in this community, but Hygrophilous Grass-
land, like the Woody Grassland, has eight grass species
(Figure 4). Trees are not abundant with up to 10 % cover
per sample plot and reaching a height of 4 m. The grass
layer has a dense cover of up to 90 % and the forb layer
up to 30 %. The non-tree layer, which includes forbs and
grasses has a mean height of 0.5 m.
Diagnostic species : the sedges Abildgaardia hygro-
phila, Cyperus natalensis, Juncus kraussii and Pycreus
polystachyos, the forbs Dissotis canescens and Ethulia
conyzoides , the fern Cyclosorus interruptus, and the
grasses Eragrostis inamoena and Ischaemum fascicula-
tum (Table 1, species group D).
Species which are also found in other plant commu-
nities include the forb Conyza ulmifolia , and the locally
dominant grass Imperata cylindrica (Table 1. species
group F). An invasive alien species that occurs fre-
quently in wet areas is Psidium guajava (Table 1, spe-
cies group F).
Rare, threatened and endemic plant species
The vegetation units of the Maputaland Coastal Belt
and MWG are not protected extensively in many statu-
tory conservation areas due to its high potential for com-
mercial timber and sugar cane plantations (Steenkamp
et al. 2005), and in the Richards Bay area specifically
due to shortage of land for industrial development.
Currently, only 17 % of this habitat type is conserved
in South Africa and this habitat type is endangered
(Mucina & Rutherford 2006).
Red Data plant species are known from the same
quarter-degree grids as the study area (283 1 DD,
2832CC). According to Scott-Shaw (1999) there are two
threatened endemic species that could occur in this type
of grassland, namely Asclepias gordon-gravae (Endan-
gered) and Kniphofia leucocephala (Critically Endan-
gered). These species are threatened by multiple factors,
including timber and sugar cane plantations, and urbani-
zation. Neither species was recorded during the survey.
Some of the species recorded during this survey
are regarded by Mucina & Rutherford (2006) to be of
regional biogeographical importance and have grouped
Abildgaardia hygrophila , Cyperus natalensis, Desmo-
dium dregeanum and Eugenia albanensis as Coastal
Belt Elements, Albertisia delagoensis and Cissampelos
hirta as Southern Distribution Limits, and Oxygonum
robustum as a Maputaland Endemic (which also includes
Mozambique and Swaziland).
Endemic species are internationally regarded as
important focal taxa to establish critical habitat for con-
servation priority (Leon-de la Luz & Breceda 2006).
Fifteen species endemic to South Africa (Germishui-
zen et al. 2006), and specifically the coastal areas, were
recorded in the study area. The endemic species comple-
ment consists of one tree, Acacia kosiensis, one geoxy-
lic suffrutex, Eugenia albanensis, and 13 forbs (Table
3). Twelve South African endemics occur in the Woody
Grassland of the study area, of which eight species are
348 Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
TABLE 3. — Species considered as South African endemics or Maputaland Woody Grassland floristic elements, represented by 34 of 227 recorded
species; 15 % of study area’s flora
* RSA endemic, species endemic to South Africa; MWG element, floristic element of Maputaland Woody Grassland; * ** occurrence: rare, < 5;
occasional, 5-10; frequent, 1 1-30; abundant, 31-60; very abundant, > 60,
locally restricted to it. The four species shared with the
other two plant communities are Eugenia albanensis,
Helichrysum asperum, Selago tarchodes and Senecio
erubescens. Acacia kosiensis, Acalypha ecklonii and
Rhynchosia stenodon are South African endemics found
in the study area, but do not occur in the Woody Grass-
land.
Of the 1 33 species recorded for the Woody Grassland
of the study area, 19 species, or 14 %, are regarded as
floristic elements of MWG by Mucina & Rutherford
(2006). This includes the trees Hyphaene coriacea and
Syzygium cordatum , the shrubs Dichrostachys cinerea
and Diospvros lycioides, the geoxylic suffrutices Ancylo-
botrys petersiana, Diospvros galpinii, Eugenia capensis ,
Parinari capensis and Salacia kraussii , the forbs Aga-
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
349
TABLE 4. — Three most dominant species recorded for each plant com-
munity of study area, with mean cover % per species per plant
community. Data from Matthews et at. (1999) has been included
for comparative purposes
WG, Woody Grassland; WM, Woodland Mosaic; HG, Hygrophilous
Grassland; ' greatest dominance of species per vegetation type; *
second greatest dominance; ' third greatest dominance.
thisanthemum bojeri , Chamaecrista plumosa, Cyperus
obtusiflorus and Helichrysum kraussii, and the grasses
Aristida stipitata , Digitaria natalensis, Diheteropogon
amplectens, Themeda triandra, Setaria sphacelata and
Urelytrum agropyroides (Table 3).
Species composition and diversity
Siebert et al. (2004) showed that Woody Grass-
land has the highest beta-diversity of grasses of all the
coastal vegetation units of Maputaland. This implies that
the turnover of grass species is high between different
localities of MWG. Therefore, although the Richards
Bay locality is characterized by dominant species not
only found in MWG (Table 4), it still fits the definition
(White 1977), since it is characterized by the presence
of geoxylic suffrutices. In the case of the Richards Bay
locality, eight geoxylic suffrutices were recorded from
the dunes, namely Ancylobotrys petersiana (occurring
in 20 % of plots), Diospyros galpinii (80 %), Elephan-
torrhiza elephantina (20 %), Eugenia albanensis ( 1 00
%), Maytenus nemorosa (40 %), P achy stigma venosum
(20 %), Parinari capensis subsp. incohata ( 100 %), and
Salacia kraussii (80 %). The presence of these species in
association with Maputaland Centre endemics typically
found in MWG, such as Oxygonum robustum (Mucina
& Rutherford 2006), further strengthens our appeal to
recognise the Richards Bay locality as containing true
MWG.
This argument is supported by an ordination (Figure
3) that relates the species composition of the different
plant communities. The stress value is lower than 0.2,
suggesting that the ordination is meaningful (Clarke &
Gorley 2001). Although all of the plant communities
are clearly grouped (Figure 3), it is evident that Woody
Grassland from the Richards Bay locality is not identi-
cal to typical Woody Grassland at Sileza 300 km further
north, as the ten plots are not grouped but separated in
two groups of five. However, it does show that the two
Woody Grassland communities are most closely related
based on the shortest distance (least dissimilarity) being
recorded between these two plant communities (Fig-
ure 3). The species composition of the Woody Grass-
land at Richards Bay showed higher dissimilarity with
the Hygrophilous Grassland of interdune depressions
at Richards Bay and Sileza, and the KwaZulu-Natal
Coastal Belt grassland of the hills near Mtunzini. One
Woodland Mosaic sample plot (plot 2) at Richards Bay
is probably a Woody Grassland community invaded by
alien woody species, hence its outlying position (Figure
3).
Kwambonambi Hygrophilous Grassland
The study area has recently been demarcated as pri-
ority conservation land, as it supposedly contained
remnants of a highly threatened and endemic terrestrial
ecosystem referred to as Kwambonambi Hygrophilous
Grassland (KHG) (Goodman 2007). However, Mucina
& Rutherford (2006) make no mention of such a vegeta-
tion unit, which suggests that it has been included within
another vegetation unit. It is this situation that requires
further clarification, as KHG is often mistakenly con-
sidered by some as MWG, because the former occurs in
a mosaic with the latter as shown before (Siebert et al.
2004). KHG is associated with inter-dune depressions
and MWG with dune crests. These two units correspond
to the definitions provided for Woody Grassland and
Hygrophilous Grassland respectively in the land-cover
classification system for Maputaland (Smith et al. 2008).
MWG is well documented in the literature, and
easy to distinguish from other grassland types such as
Hygrophilous Grassland (Myre 1964; Matthews et al.
1999). KHG is poorly defined in the literature, because
large tracts of land previously considered as Hygrophi-
lous Grassland have been transformed with Eucalyptus
plantations and, hence, its composition and boundaries
are poorly documented and difficult to determine. KHG
is known as the habitat of a set of threatened species
considered to be endemic, defined as wet areas such as
seasonal pans and interdune depressions (Scott-Shaw
1999). Such habitat types are not typical for MWG, as
shown in this paper. We therefore suggest that what we
mapped as Ischaemum fasciculatum-Imperata cylin-
drica Hygrophilous Grassland in this paper is what is
generally referred to as KHG. It, together with other
vegetation types, is included as part of what Mucina &
Rutherford (2006) refer to as the Maputaland Coastal
Belt vegetation unit (CB1). MWG grassland also forms
part of this vegetation unit, although Mucina & Ruther-
ford (2006) probably described it as a separate unit due
to its peculiar complement of suffrutices.
CONCLUSION
This site-specific study revealed a vegetation struc-
ture and floristic diversity that corresponds to the
descriptions of MWG made by Matthews et al. (1999).
This paper confirms that MWG, a limited and threat-
ened ecosystem, has an extent of occurrence that
stretches west of Richards Bay, where it probably forms
350
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
the southernmost outlier population of the vegeta-
tion unit in the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome (Van
Wyk & Smith 2001). This mapped range extension of
MWG will be made available to the National Vegeta-
tion Map Committee to assist in ongoing improvements
to the electronic version of the national vegetation map.
Another threatened ecosystem, KHG, also occurs exten-
sively at the study site. In an urbanized and already frag-
mented landscape, it is important to maintain and protect
such important ecosystems (Leon-de la Luz & Breceda
2006). Careful management of this patch of MWG and
KHG as a green belt within a fragmented industrial zone
can transform it into valuable sites in terms of biodiver-
sity conservation (Tang et al. 2007).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The City of uMhlatuze financially supported this
research. We thank Mr Hennie Smit and Mr Ernst van
Biljon, uMhlatuze Municipality, for logistical support
and authorizing access to the industrial development
zone.
REFERENCES
BOTHA, G.A. 1997. Maputaland: focus on the Quaternary evolution of
the Southeast African Coastal Plain, Field Guide and Abstracts.
Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.
CLARKE, K.R. & GORLEY, R.N. 2001. PRIMER v.5. User manual/
Tutorial. PRIMER Ltd, Plymouth, UK.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) 2006. [computer
package], ArcMap™, ArcGIS 9.1. Redlands, California, USA.
GERMISHUIZEN, G„ MEYER. N.L., STEENKAMP, Y. & KEITH, M.
2006. A checklist of South Afi-ican plants. Southern African Botani-
cal Diversity Network Report No. 41. SABONET, Pretoria.
GOODMAN, P.S. 2007. KwaZulu-Natal Terrestrial Conservation Plan
(C-Plan), Version 4. Biodiversity Conservation Planning Divi-
sion, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife.
HENDERSON, L. 2006. Comparisons of invasive plants in southern
Africa originating from southern temperate, northern temperate
and tropical regions. Bothalia 36: 201-222.
HENNEKENS, S. 1996. MEGA TAB: a visual editor for phytosociologi-
ca! tables. [Computer program]. Version 1.0. User’s guide. Ulflt:
Giesen & Geurts.
HILL, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN— a FORTRAN program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two way table bv classification
of individuals and attributes. [Computer program]. New York,
Cornell University, Ithaca.
LEON-DE LA LUZ, J.L. & BRECEDA, A. 2006. Using endemic plant
species to establish critical habitats in the Sierra de La Laguna
Biosphere Reserve, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Biodiversity
and Conservation 15: 1043-1055.
LUBBE, R.A. 1997. Vegetation and flora of the Kosi Bay Coastal For-
est Reserve in Maputaland, northern KwaZulu-Natal. South
Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
MADDOCK, A. & BENN, G.A. 2000. Identification of conservation-
worthy areas in northern Zululand, South Africa. Conservation
Biology 14: 155-166.
MATTHEWS, W.S., VAN WYK, A.E. & VAN ROOYEN. N. 1999.
Vegetation of the Sileza Nature Reserve and neighbouring areas.
South Africa, and its importance in conserving the woody grass-
lands of the Maputaland Centre of Endemism. Bothalia 29:
151-167.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD. M.C. 2006. The vegetation of South
Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1 974. Aims and meth-
ods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.
MYRE. M. 1 964. A vegetacao do extremno sul de provincia da Mocam-
bique. Junta de Investigacoes do Ultramar, Lisboa.
RAIMONDO, D„ VON STADEN, L„ FODEN, W„ VICTOR, J.E.,
HELME, N.A., TURNER. R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MAN-
YAMA, P.A. (eds). 2009. Red List of South African plants 2009.
Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pre-
toria.
SCHULTZE, R.E. 1982. Agrohydrology and agroclimatology of Natal.
Agricultural Catchments Research Unit Report 14. University of
Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
SCOTT-SHAW, R. 1999. Rare and threatened plants of KwaZulu-Natal
and neighbouring regions: a plant red data book. KZNNCS,
Cascades.
SIEBERT, S.J.. FISH, L„ UIRAS, M.M. & IZIDINE, S.A. 2004. Grass
assemblages of conservation areas of the coastal plain south of
Maputo Bay, Mozambique. Bothalia 34: 61-71.
SMITH, R.J., EASTON, J„ NHANCALE, B.A., ARMSTRONG,
A. J., CULVERWELL, J„ DLAMINI, S.D., GOODMAN,
P.S., LOFFLER, L„ MATTHEWS, W.S., MONADJEM, A.,
MULQUEENY, C.M., NGWENYA, P„ NTUMI, C.P., SOTO,
B. & LEADER-WILLIAMS, N. 2008. Designing a transfrontier
conservation landscape for the Maputaland Centre of Endemism
using biodiversity, economic and threat data. Biological Conser-
vation 141: 2127-2138 .
STEENKAMP, Y„ VAN WYK, B„ VICTOR, J„ HOARE, D„ SMITH,
G„ DOLD, T. & COWLING, R. 2005. Maputaland-Pondoland-
Albany. In R.A. Mittermeier, P. Robles Gil, M. Hoffman, J.
Pilgrim, T. Brooks, C. Goettsch Mittermeier, J. Lamoreux &
G.A.B. da Fonseca, Hotspots revisited: Earth's biologically
richest and most threatened terrestrial ecoregions. Conservation
International, Washington.
TANG, B.S., WONG, S.W. & LEE, A.K.W. 2007. Green belt in a com-
pact city: a zone for conservation or transition? Landscape and
Urban Planning 79: 358-373.
VAN WYK, A.E. & SMITH, G.F. 200 1 . Regions offloristic endemism in
southern Africa. A review with emphasis on succulents. Umdaus
Press, Hatfield, Pretoria.
WHITE, F. 1977. The underground forests of Africa: a preliminary
review. Gardens ' Bulletin, Singapore 29: 57-71.
WILLIAMS, N.S.G. 2005. The ecology of fragmented native grass-
lands in urban and rural landscapes. Ph.D. thesis. University of
Melbourne, Australia.
Bothalia 41,2: 351-361 (2011)
Floristic analysis of domestic gardens in the Tlokwe City Municipality,
South Africa
C.S. LUBBE*, S.J. SIEBERT* and S.S. CILLIERS*
Keywords: Agavaceae, alien plants, Asteraceae, diversity, grassland, home gardens, native plants, Potchefstroom. urban ecology
ABSTRACT
This paper is a first attempt to describe the flora of domestic gardens from an urban environment in South Africa. A total
of 835 plant species of 501 genera in 145 families was recorded from 100 gardens in a 54.9 km- area of the Tlokwe City Mu-
nicipality [Potchefstroom], North-West Province. A substantial number of alien species (580) were recorded, but also many
indigenous species (255) that included South African endemics (61) and protected species on the National Red Data List (18).
A number of the alien species that were commonly cultivated are declared invasive plants in South Africa (88). Most of the
cultivated indigenous taxa originated from the southeastern provinces of South Africa.
This study provides new knowledge on the often overlooked biodiversity of urban areas in a developing, mega-diverse
country. Most studies of a similar nature were conducted in the developed countries of Europe and are of limited use in the
development of management plans of urban ecosystems in southern Africa.
INTRODUCTION
Urbanization is one of the most significant demo-
graphic trends of all times (Pickett et al. 2001) and it
has a devastating impact on the environment (Wu et al.
2003). The increase in population density of urban areas
(Pickett et al. 2001) results in infrastructure develop-
ment and the subsequent transformation of natural areas.
Significant changes in biological and spatial composition
alter the structure of ecosystems, which in turn influence
the processes underlying such ecosystems, for example
nutrient cycles, water relations and climate systems (Wu
et al. 2003). Plants play an important role in sustaining
urban ecosystems (Savard et al. 2000; Colding 2007).
Urban green spaces provide physical ecosystem services
such as temperature and flood control, removal of carbon
from the atmosphere and social ecosystem services such
as the increase of aesthetic values and community well-
being (Bolund & Hunhammar 1999; Alberti 2005; Hope
et al. 2006). Knowledge of urban vascular plant floras
is therefore a prerequisite to maintaining and improving
these ecosystem services of the urban environment and
to keep it favourable for life within to persist.
Globally, urban vascular plant floras have higher
diversity than that of the surrounding countryside. This
trend was noted in California and Phoenix, Arizona in
the USA (Hope et al. 2003; Williams et al. 2005), Brus-
sels in Belgium (Godefroid & Koedam 2007) and sev-
eral cities in Germany (Kuhn et al. 2004). In Sheffield,
England, the gamma diversity recorded in a relatively
small number of domestic gardens equalled that of the
native flora in the area, and was expected to become
much higher with increasing sample size (Smith et al.
2006). The comparatively higher gamma diversity of
urban vegetation is mainly the result of the high spatio-
temporal heterogeneity in urban environments (Rebele
1994) and an increasing dispersal of alien plant spe-
* School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West
University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa. E-
mail: stefan.siebert@ nwu.ac.za.
MS. received: 2010-09-15.
cies via global transportation and other human actions
(McKinney 2008).
The richness of garden floras is related to the size of
the species pool available to gardeners (Thompson et
al. 2003). A list containing more than 70 000 plant spe-
cies that are available from United Kingdom nurseries
was compiled by Macaulay et al. (2009), while Isaac-
son (2004) presented a list that consisted of 90 000
plant species available for sale in the USA. Glen (2002)
published a book on the cultivated plants of southern
Africa that contains ± 37 000 species (not claimed to
be a fully comprehensive list), compared with the little
over 2 1 800 species in the native flora of southern Africa
(Germishuizen et al. 2006).
The aim of this study is to present a first total floristic
survey of domestic gardens in a typical, medium-sized,
southern African city. Objectives were to analyse and
describe the plant diversity found in domestic gardens
at family, genus and species levels, to determine the ori-
gin of species under cultivation, and assess the endemic,
threatened, useful and invasive plant species in the gar-
den flora. The analysis provides baseline information
with which to compare garden floras of other cities and
countries, and will contribute to the establishment of a
broader understanding of the management and conser-
vation potential of this land use type. Additionally, the
comparison of the garden flora with the flora of other
urban open spaces (other land use types) in the Tlokwe
City Municipality (Cilliers 1998) will shed light on the
contribution that domestic gardens make towards total
urban plant diversity.
STUDY AREA
This study was conducted in the Tlokwe City Munici-
pality (TCM) in the North-West Province, which is
situated between 26°39' and 26°44' latitude and 27°00'
and 27°08' longitude (Figure 1). It includes the town of
Potchefstroom, the township areas of Ikageng, Promosa
and Mohadin, the surrounding smallholdings, and infor-
352
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
FIGURE 1. — Map ofTlokwe City Municipality (TCM) in South Africa. Survey points indicated by black dots.
mal settlements on the edges of the city. The area has
about 140 500 inhabitants (Work Well 2004). The study
area falls in the Grassland Biome where the Carleton-
ville Dolomite Grassland, Andesite Mountain Bushveld
and the Rand Highveld Grassland vegetation units con-
verge (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). It is situated at an
altitude of I 350 m and the climate of the region can
be described as arid-temperate (Mucina & Rutherford
2006) with an erratic mean annual rainfall of 593 mm
(mainly in the summer months) and cold, dry winters.
Dry years can have annual rainfall as low as 230-300
mm. The mean maximum temperature during the sum-
mer months (Dec.-Feb.) is 30.7°C with a mean mini-
mum of 0.3°C in the winter months (Jun.-Aug.) and
frequent frost (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). The great-
est threat to the natural vegetation in the province is the
transformation of natural land by agriculture, mining
and urbanization (Mangold et al. 2002), threats that are
common in areas containing high biodiversity (Kuhn et
al. 2004; Jha & Bawa 2006).
METHODS
For the purpose of this paper, the following defini-
tions were used with regard to species classification as
native, indigenous-cultivated, alien or naturalized:
• native — naturally occurring within the study area,
usually not cultivated;
• indigenous-cultivated —indigenous to South Africa
and not occurring naturally within the study area,
but cultivated in gardens;
• naturalized — not indigenous to South Africa, but
occurring in the study area where it sustains self-
replacing populations outside of cultivation with-
out direct intervention by people (includes invasive
aliens);
• alien cultivated — not indigenous to South Africa
and not naturalized in the study area, but cultivated
in gardens and including garden hybrid species
(includes invasive aliens).
A topographic map of the study area was overlaid with a
grid consisting of 500 x 500 m squares in ArcView (Envi-
ronmental Systems Research Institute — ESR1 2006) to
identify sampling co-ordinates. Co-ordinates were deter-
mined from grid intersects and the exact position of each
point in the field was located with a Global Positioning
System. A random selection of any domestic garden in its
vicinity (no further than 100 m away) was made. If access
to the chosen site was denied (which happened on two
occasions), an adjacent garden was sampled. A total of 1 00
gardens were sampled (Figure 1). Corporate gardens were
not included in this study as the management and economic
input differ widely from that of domestic gardens.
All the vascular plant species in each garden were noted
(presence/absence) to compile a comprehensive list in order
to make a qualitative assessment of garden flora. Data from
a previous study in the same urban area (Cilliers 1998)
were used to compare the garden flora with that of other
land use types: natural and semi-natural areas, wetlands,
managed areas (parks, pavements and parking areas), road-
side verges, vacant lots and railway reserves. In the case
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
353
of domestic gardens, native and indigenous-cultivated spe-
cies were grouped as indigenous, and cultivated alien and
naturalized species were grouped together as alien species,
as the data from the previous study (Cilliers 1998) did not
distinguish between these groups. Cilliers (1998) sampled
the vegetation using the Braun-Blanquet method with plot
sizes of 16 m2 for grassland and 100 m2 for woody vegeta-
tion to ensure that a representative number of species was
detected. Non-random, systematic plantings and high spe-
cies turnover between gardens due to human preferences,
enforced a larger plot size for gardens to ensure a represent-
ative sample. The mean plot size for the sampling approach
in gardens was determined as a quarter of the mean yard
size in the TCM (1 648 m2, which includes built-up areas
such as the house) and was fixed at 20 x 20 m (400 nr) to
ensure that no yard would be smaller than the plot. Gen-
erally, a large proportion of the whole garden (cultivated
area) could be chosen as the sample plot. In cases where
the gardens (cultivated area) were smaller than the sample
plot, paved areas were also included in the sample, as plants
often occurred as container plants or weeds.
The indigenous flora of the TCM is well sampled (Bester
et al. 2008) and collections in herbaria were sufficient for
the identification of indigenous and alien weedy and inva-
sive species that are commonly found. The identification of
horticultural plant species was complicated, as these taxa
are not well represented in herbaria. Books on gardening
and garden plants were used to identify these alien horticul-
tural species (Pienaar 1994, 2000; Joffe 2007; Smith & Van
Wyk 2008).
Cross-referencing was done between our checklist and
the South African Red Data List of plants (Raimondo et
al. 2009) to determine which threatened species occurred
in the domestic gardens of the TCM. Alien invader species
were identified from a list of invader species compiled by
Henderson (2001), which is based on national legislation
(South Africa 1983; Conservation of Agricultural Resources
Act of 1983). The distribution of indigenous and natural-
ized species of South Africa was extracted from Germishui-
zen et al. (2006). The origin of cultivated alien species
as well as the uses of cultivated species was determined
from the literature (Van Wyk & Gericke 2000; Glen 2002;
United States Department of Agriculture 2009; Aluka 2010;
Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk 2010). The species accumula-
tion curve was based on 100 randomly shuffled runs, done
with the statistical package, Primer 5 (Clarke & Gorley
2001).
The species grown in the domestic gardens of the TCM
were sorted into seven categories: ornamental, weed, food,
medicinal, shade, hedge and windbreak. A category for fuel
was not included, as any flammable biomass (e.g. firewood,
dung, charcoal) serves this purpose for many poor house-
holds in the absence of electricity (Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment 2003) and therefore no plants were found to be
specifically cultivated for this purpose.
RESULTS
Best represented families
A total of 145 plant families was recorded for the
domestic gardens of the TCM and 56 families (39 %) were
represented by only a single species in the study area. The
20 best represented families represent 54 % (455 spe-
cies) of the total number of species recorded (Table 1).
Representation, as indicated here, was determined by the
number of species recorded for a given family, regardless
of the frequency of occurrence of each species.
Ten of the 20 best represented families in the TCM are
on the list (Table 1 ) of the most species-rich South African
families (Germishuizen et al. 2006). Asteraceae, Fabaceae
and Iridaceae are the most species-rich South African fam-
ilies and are amongst the top five for the study area. The
third and fifth most species-rich South African families
(Mesembryanthemaceae and Ericaceae, respectively) were
not amongst the best represented garden families. The best
represented families contain many garden genera and spe-
cies that are extensively cultivated throughout the world
(e.g. Lamiaceae: Ocimum spp., Lavandula spp., Plectran-
thus spp.; Rosaceae: Cotoneaster spp., Rosa spp.. Primus
spp.; Crassulaceae: Sedum spp.. Echeveria spp., Kalan-
choe spp.) and many naturalized species (e.g. Fabaceae:
Prosopis glandulosa, Robinia pseudoacacia , Medicago
laciniata ; Solanaceae: Solarium sisymbri folium , Cestrum
elegans ; Agavaceae: Agave americana).
Twenty-six families (18 % of all plant families record-
ed for the TCM) could be classified as exclusively alien as
none of their constituent species are indigenous to South
Africa (Table 2). These alien families generally comprised
less than 10 species, with the exception of Agavaceae with
12 species, which is ranked fifteenth of the twenty best
represented families in the TCM (Table 1).
Best represented genera
In total, 501 plant genera were recorded in the TCM.
Of these, two-thirds were represented by only a single
species in the TCM. The ten best represented genera
TABLE 1 . — Twenty best represented plant families of domestic gardens
in the TCM. Superscript enumerators indicate a family’s posi-
tion as one of the 20 largest families in the South African flora
(Snyman 2009)
354
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
TABLE 2. — Exclusively alien plant families recorded for domestic gar-
dens of TCM and no. species representing each family
constituted nine percent of the total number of recorded
species (Table 3). Only three of the best represented
genera ( Asparagus , Cyperus and Tradescantia) belong
to families not included amongst the 20 best repre-
sented for the study area (Asparagaceae, Cyperaceae
and Commelinaceae). Thirty-four of the 78 species (44
%) belonging to the ten best represented genera of urban
domestic gardens in the TCM are alien to South Africa.
TABLE 3. — Best represented genera in domestic gardens of TCM and
no. species representing each
Most frequent species
A total of 835 species was recorded from the domes-
tic gardens of the TCM, of which 235 were recorded
only once and most of them were alien (70 %). The spe-
cies accumulation curve for these 100 sample plots had
not reached an asymptote (Figure 2), suggesting that the
species will further increase as more gardens are sam-
pled.
The 20 plant species that occurred most frequently
were all present in more than half of the sampled gar-
dens (Table 4). Pennisetum clandestinum , as the most
favoured lawn grass, was the highest ranked species as
it occurred in all but one of the gardens (99 %). Another
grass species, Cynodon dcictylon , had the second high-
est frequency. Three herbaceous species (Euphorbia
prostrata, Conyza bonariensis and Guilleminea dens a),
which are commonly considered as naturalized garden
weeds, made up the rest of the top five. Cynodon dacty-
lon is the only native species amongst the top five most
frequent species and it is also regarded as a declared
weed (Henderson 2001). Ten of the recorded 20 most
frequent species are naturalized in South Africa, com-
pared to the seven cultivated (indigenous and alien)
and three native species. The best-represented families
among the twenty most frequent species are the Poaceae
(five species) and Asteraceae (three species).
TABLE 4. — Twenty most frequently recorded species from domestic
gardens of TCM
* alien spp.; CA, cultivated alien; IC, indigenous-cultivated; Nat,
native; N, naturalized.
Endemic species
A list of species endemic to South Africa was
recorded for the domestic gardens of the TCM (Table
5). It serves as confirmation of the contribution that
domestic gardens make towards the conservation of
unique plant species. In total, 61 endemic species were
recorded, all of which are commonly cultivated, except
for three species that are normally only found as weeds
in gardens (Pienaar 1994; Pienaar 2000; Germishuizen
et al. 2006). Tulbaghia violacea was the most com-
monly cultivated South African endemic as it occurred
in 30 % of the sampled gardens. Portulaca grandiflora
and Sida spinosa were both also commonly cultivated
(27 %). Nine other endemic species were present in 10
% or more of the sample plots. In contrast, 49 endemic
species occurred in less than 10 % of the plots, with 19
found only once.
Endangered and protected species
Eighteen species that have a threat status assigned
according to the South African National Red Data List
(Raimondo et al. 2009), were recorded from domestic
gardens in the TCM (Table 6). These include species
listed as EN: Endangered (4); VU: Vulnerable (4); NT:
Near Threatened (3); Rare (2); and Declining (5). The
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
355
most common of these threatened species were Clivia
miniata (VU) and Dietes bicolor (Rare), which occurred
in more than 10 % of the sampled gardens. The occur-
rence of the remaining 16 species was lower (Table 6).
Useful plants
The utilization of plants as food, natural healing rem-
edies, construction material and for other benefits is as
FIGURE 2. — Species accumulation
curve for 100 domestic gar-
dens in TCM.
TABLE 5. — South African endemic species recorded from domestic gardens of TCM
C, cultivated; N, natural.
356
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
TABLE 6. — Red Data species recorded in domestic gardens of TCM
(Raimondo et al. 2009)
EN, Endangered; NT, Near Threatened; VU, Vulnerable.
old as humanity itself and an important part of South
Africa’s cultural heritage (Van Wyk et al. 1997; Van
Wyk & Gericke 2000). Most of the plant species (61 %)
were cultivated in domestic gardens solely for ornamen-
tal purposes (Figure 3). Frequent species in this group
included Rosa chinensis and Agapanthus praecox. The
second largest group was the weeds (16 %), with Cyno-
don dactylon and Euphorbia prostrata as frequent spe-
cies. A further 9 % of the species were classified as food
plants on account of their edible leaves, tubers, fruits or
seeds. Medicinal plants accounted for 7 % of all the spe-
cies, while 5 % were regarded as shade trees. Hedges
and windbreaks did not make a considerable contribu-
tion in terms of species richness.
Origin of indigenous-cultivated species
Most of the species found in the domestic gardens of
the TCM do not occur naturally in South Africa (72.2
% of the garden flora). The remaining 27.8 % of the
recorded garden flora consisted of 232 native and indig-
enous-cultivated species (Germishuizen et al. 2006). The
number of indigenous species in each of six geographi-
cal groups in South Africa is shown in Figure 4. Wide-
spread species, that have fewer specific environmental
preferences, contributed greatly towards the cultivated
garden flora, with 122 species recorded from more than
eight of the 13 regions specified in Germishuizen et al.
(2006). Thereafter, most of the cultivated species (69)
were contributed by the flora of the Eastern Cape and
KwaZulu-Natal (southeastern provinces). The other four
regions all made smaller contributions to the domestic
garden flora of the TCM (Figure 4).
Ornamental
K Weed
* Food
- Medicinal
16% - Shade
- Hedge
■ Windbreak
FIGURE 3. — Contribution of urban
flora towards seven useful
plant categories of domestic
gardens in TCM.
FIGURE 4. — Main geographical origin
of indigenous-cultivated species
that were recorded for domestic
gardens in TCM. South-central
(Free State, Lesotho); North-
central (North-West Province,
Limpopo, Botswana); Western
(Western Cape, Northern Cape,
Namibia); North-eastern (Mpu-
malanga, Gauteng, Swaziland),
South-eastern (KwaZulu-Natal,
Eastern Cape); Widespread,
defined as occurring naturally in
eight or more regions.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
357
TABLE 7. — Three most frequent invasive species recorded for each
declared category of invasiveness and proposed invaders. No.
species recorded for each category in brackets
Category 1 : prohibited in South Africa, must be eradicated where pos-
sible; Category 2: planting only allowed under controlled condi-
tions in demarcated areas, trading only with permits; Category
3: no further plantings and no trade allowed (Henderson 2001 ).
Origin of naturalized and cultivated alien species
No information was available regarding the origin of 65
of the naturalized and cultivated alien species, and 31 spe-
cies originated from more than one region. The remain-
ing 484 naturalized and cultivated alien species could be
grouped according to regions of common origin (Figure 5).
More than a third (36.4 %) of the alien horticultural plant
species found in the domestic gardens of the TCM was
originally introduced from the Americas (North, Central
and/or South America). Asia was the second largest contri-
butor to the alien horticultural flora, as 23.3 % of the spe-
cies originate from there. Hybrids that originated in gardens
also made a significant contribution of 9.5 %.
Invasive species
Apart from the substantial utilization, maintenance
and conservation of biodiversity found in gardens, there
are some unforeseen consequences, such as the occur-
FIGURE 5. — Ten regions of origin
of alien cultivated and natu-
ralized alien species recorded
for domestic gardens in TCM.
rence of invasive alien species. In the domestic gardens
of the TCM, 88 declared invader and weed species were
found (Table 7) (Henderson 2001). There were 32 Cate-
gory 1 declared weeds, which comprise the most severe
type of invasive species. Canna x generalis formed part
of this group and it occurred in 43 % of gardens. Penni-
setum clandestinum and Cynodon dactylon , which have
shown the highest occurrences of all, were some of the
species classified as Category 2 declared invaders. Cate-
gory 3 declared invaders had the highest number of spe-
cies (36) and included, amongst others, Ligustrum luci-
dum in more than 60 % of the surveyed gardens. Celtis
sinensis (38 %), from the list of proposed invaders, was
found to be the most frequent species in this category.
Growth forms
Most of the species found in the domestic gardens of
the TCM were forbs (341) (Figure 6). Euphorbia pros-
trata and Guilleminea densa were the most frequent her-
baceous species occurring respectively in 79 % and 72 %
of sample plots. The second most frequent growth form
was shrubs (173 species) with frequent species such as
Rosa chinensis and Ficus carica , followed by trees (131
species), of which the most frequent representative was
the popular hedge species Ligustrum lucidum. Primus
persica was found to be the second most frequent tree
species, as it is commonly cultivated for its edible fruit.
Succulents, geophytes and graminoids were all repre-
sented by a lower, but relatively similar number of spe-
cies with ferns being the smallest represented group.
Total species diversity
The total number of species and the numbers of
indigenous and alien species of different land use types
were compared (Figure 7). Two distinct floristic differ-
ences are evident between domestic gardens and the
other land use types. The first is the substantially higher
total number of species (or gamma diversity) of domes-
tic gardens when compared to the other land use types.
The other difference is the inverted relationship of indig-
enous and alien species in domestic gardens when com-
pared to the other land use types. Domestic gardens con-
tained almost twice as many alien as indigenous species.
358
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
173
1131
I
Trees Succulents Geophytes Graminoids Ferns
Growth form
DISCUSSION
Most frequent taxa
Urban areas are characterized as heterogeneous and
highly dynamic environments (Rebele 1994), a phe-
nomenon that is also observed within domestic gardens
of residential areas (Mathieu et al. 2007). The gamma
diversity of plant species encountered in the 100 sam-
pled domestic gardens of the TCM (835 species) is in
accordance with results from other studies, e.g. 973 spe-
cies in Lauris, France, from 120 gardens (Marco et al.
2008) and 1 166 species in Sheffield, United Kingdom,
from 61 gardens (Smith et al. 2006). However, the fact
that 235 species were recorded only once is indicative of
the high species turnover between gardens, and is con-
sistent with the gardens of Sheffield (Thompson et al.
2003). The lack of saturation of the species accumula-
tion curve is also in accordance with results from other
domestic garden studies (Smith et al. 2006) and indi-
cates that the number of plant species would continue
to increase if more sample sites were included in the
survey. According to Smith et al. (2006), the theoretical
limit for the garden species pool is set by the number of
species available in the horticultural trade.
All the most frequent garden genera are well repre-
sented in the South African natural flora, except for
FIGURE 6. — Dominant growth forms
of flora in domestic gardens of
TCM.
Primus and Tradescantia (Germishuizen et al. 2006).
Many species from the most frequent genera, such as
Solanum, Aloe and Salvia, are popular ornamental spe-
cies or declared weeds, which may explain to a certain
extent the frequent occurrence of these genera in gar-
dens. Despite a high number of species from these gen-
era being alien to South Africa (44 %), none of the most
frequent genera belong to alien families. This means that
the alien species have a close affinity with South Afri-
can indigenous species at family level (Germishuizen et
al. 2006). Of the 20 most frequent species, most were
naturalized weeds rather than cultivated species. These
naturalized species may originally have been horticul-
tural subjects that escaped from gardens into the natural
surroundings (Hodkinson & Thompson 1997; Siebert et
al. 2010). Species belonging to alien plant families are
cultivated mostly for their high ornamental value, e.g.
Cordyline australis, Abelia x grandiflora , Aspidistra
elatior and Nandina domestica.
Endemic and endangered species
Endemic and endangered species represent only a
small portion of the garden flora, but, however small the
contribution of a few gardens may be towards the pro-
tection of such species, its collective effort across an
entire urban ecosystem and also globally holds tremen-
■ Total number of species
■ Number of indigenous species
I Number of alien species
I.
u
Domestic Natural and Wetlands Managed areas Roadside verges Vacant lots
Land use types
Ralhva
reserve
FIGURE 7. — Comparison of total
species, indigenous species
(including native species)
and alien species (including
naturalized species) for land
use types of TCM (gamma
diversity).
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
359
dous potential (Savard et al. 2000: Gaston et al. 2005).
However, the cultivation of these species takes place for
their utilitarian value and not necessarily with conserva-
tion in mind. As perceptions of what is considered useful
can change over time, these plant species of conserva-
tion concern may be replaced with something new. The
presence of these rare and endangered species in domes-
tic gardens highlights the role that such land use types
can fulfil in the conservation of indigenous biodiversity,
albeit a somewhat vulnerable niche. Through interac-
tion of gardens with other types of greenspace in close
vicinity within the urban environment, better support of
biodiversity is possible — a concept described by Colding
(2007) as ‘ecological land-use complementation’. This
means that more indigenous species can be supported
in terms of nutrition, space and water resources by the
combined patches of the entire urban green infrastruc-
ture, which stresses the importance of proper planning
of urban development. Furthermore, the conservation
resources that already exist can be utilized better in pro-
tecting not only endangered, but also abundant indig-
enous species (Hamilton 1999).
Useful plants
Despite the high proportion of species originating
from Asia and the Americas, the culture of gardening
in Potchefstroom is predominantly European (Cilliers
2010), which has influenced local cultures across socio-
economic classes (Lubbe et al. 2010), resulting in the
high frequency of ornamental plant species in most gar-
dens of the city. Inhabitants of Ganyesa, a small, rural
village in the North-West Province, also cultivate many
ornamental species — an indication that even poorer, more
traditional communities regard aesthetics as important
(Cilliers 2010). Weeds, the second largest group (Figure
3), are not favoured by gardeners because of their occur-
rence in unwanted locations (Henderson 2001 ). However,
these plants are almost always present in gardens and
contribute towards the ecological environment within the
garden. Food plants did not contribute as significantly to
the diversity of the total flora (9 %) of the TCM gardens
as would be expected. For instance, in Ganyesa almost
28 % of plant species were classified as food plants (Cil-
liers 2010). Molebatsi et al. (2010) have shown that the
Batswana communities in the rural areas harboured a
greater number of useful, indigenous species in their
home gardens. This is an indication of the dependence
of poorer communities on utility gardens for their live-
lihoods. The other categories (medicinal, shade, hedge
and windbreak species) all made very small contributions
to the diversity of the garden flora. Some of the species
that are cultivated locally as hedges, however, occurred
in many gardens ( Ligustrum hicidum, 63 %; Rosa bank-
siae, 19 %), indicating that a low percentage contribution
of a plant use category (Figure 3) may underestimate the
importance of its constituent species.
Species distribution
Species that are widespread throughout and occur natu-
rally in South Africa (native and indigenous-cultivated
species) were most common in gardens, such as the tree
Acacia karroo, and grasses Cynodon dactylon and Era-
grostis lehmanniana. Species originating from the south-
eastern provinces were also commonly cultivated, for
example Chlorophytum comosum, Tulbaghia violacea
and Clivia miniata. Van Jaarsveld (2001) argued that spe-
cies from the Eastern Cape are especially well suited for
gardening almost anywhere in the world, because they
are extremely tolerant to disturbance, wide temperature
ranges and can endure both drought and excessively wet
conditions. Fewer species from the other regions of South
Africa (for example fynbos species) are found in gardens,
as they may not always be as tolerant of the dynamic and
ever-changing conditions in gardens. The fact that indige-
nous species play an important role in cultivation practices
is partly ascribed to nurseries promoting such plantings in
gardens. All three of the major nurseries in Potchefstroom
keep 20-30 % of indigenous stock for cultivation and re-
commend these above alien horticultural species (J. du
Toit 2010, A. Grobler 2010, I. Scheepers 2010 pers.
comm.). In many cases, however, customers purchase
the more colourful or hardy alien horticultural species, of
which there is normally a greater variety available.
Plant species from similar climates are adapted to
specific environmental conditions, such as temperature
ranges and frost resistance, and should thus be able to
survive such conditions elsewhere. Commonalities
between the climate of the country of origin of culti-
vated alien species and the South African Highveld cli-
mate could be the reason why the Americas and Asia
were the largest contributors to the alien horticultural
flora of the TCM, indicating that plant species from
these regions may be best suited for the local climatic
conditions, and even hardier than most indigenous spe-
cies. Apart from hardiness and suitability for cultivation,
these cultivated alien species also share another impor-
tant characteristic — ornamental or food value — that
makes them popular for cultivation. The garden hybrids
also made a substantial contribution to the garden flora,
suggesting that these taxa are already adapted to the
environmental conditions in domestic gardens.
Invasive species
South Africa is regarded as a country threatened by
invasive alien plants, with 1 226 alien taxa occurring
within its borders (Richardson et al. 2005). Many of
these alien species possess the potential to escape from
cultivation in gardens to form self-sustaining natural
populations (Sullivan et al. 2005). This may have det-
rimental effects on the survival and existence of indig-
enous vegetation and biodiversity (Pimentel et al. 2000;
Richardson & Van Wilgen 2004). The high number of
alien invasive species found in domestic gardens of the
TCM confirmed that this problem has its origin in eco-
systems created by man where sources of alien invasive
species are maintained. Most of the invasive species
found in domestic gardens either were cultivated exten-
sively in the past, although they may not be commer-
cially available anymore, e.g. Ligustrum lucidum , or are
still cultivated and available today (Canna x generalis,
Celtis sinensis and Pennisetum clandestinum). The fact
that these species are still cultivated could be an indica-
tion that they may become even more problematic in the
future and that more cultivated species have the poten-
tial to spread into the natural environment (Aronson et
al. 2007). However, due to the low occurrence of most
360
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
of the cultivated invasive species in gardens, it is less
likely that these species will spread outside of cultiva-
tion. This information on the presence and abundance of
invasive species in domestic gardens can be incorpor-
ated into preventative measures and eradication plans for
the future.
Species diversity
The higher gamma diversity of domestic gardens
when compared to other land use types is further proof
of the heterogeneous nature of urban areas and gardens.
In the Phoenix-Arizona metropolis, Hope et al. (2003)
found that the city had much higher gamma diversity
than the surrounding desert as a result of the introduced
alien vegetation that has replaced the indigenous species.
The high gamma diversity of urban domestic gardens is
the result of the diverse species pool that gardeners can
choose from for cultivation purposes in a variety of habi-
tat types. Plant diversity is generally viewed as an indi-
cation and determinant of overall biodiversity, influenc-
ing all related biota (Matson et al. 1997) and the green
spaces in urban areas are thus of critical importance for
all that are living in these environments.
More alien than indigenous species are cultivated in
domestic gardens because cultivation practices promote
the planting of hardy and aesthetic alien species that
can be imported from all over the world (Thompson et
al. 2003; Kuhn et al. 2004), simultaneously contribut-
ing to high species diversity. Gardens are continually
supplied with nutrients and water, thus diminishing the
constraints of survival associated with natural areas and
thereby increasing the number of species that can exist
in a limited environment (Hope et al 2003; Niinemets
& Pehuelas 2008). Species that would otherwise not sur-
vive in local habitats and climates are thus able to sur-
vive.
CONCLUSION
The data presented here is a snapshot of the entire
garden flora of a southern African city — a moment in
time of a very dynamic and complex system. Neverthe-
less, it provides a broad picture of the state of the gar-
den flora. As there is very little such descriptive data
available, especially for developing countries, this paper
contributes to the pool of knowledge necessary to under-
stand urban biodiversity, and urban ecosystems as a
whole, more effectively.
Domestic gardens contribute to the plant diversity of
the urban ecosystem, which forms the basis of the pro-
vision of several ecosystem goods and services. Fur-
thermore, gardens have enormous potential to maintain
indigenous diversity and threatened species, albeit on
a small scale, in every garden. On the other hand, with
most of the species cultivated in gardens being alien, it
holds the potential to produce even more invasive spe-
cies that could harm our natural ecosystems and indige-
nous vegetation. Considering both the benefits of garden
vegetation and the possible threat that it poses to our nat-
ural heritage, much more knowledge on the ecological
functioning of gardens is necessary to fully understand
their features and allow authorities to manage the natural
environment in cities sensibly and optimize its potential
for sustainability.
REFERENCES
ALBERTI, M. 2005. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem func-
tion. Internationa l Regional Science Review 28: 168-192.
ALUKA. 2010. African plants (accessed 3 Feb. 2010).
http://www.aluka.org/page/content/plants.jsp.
ARONSON, M.F.J., HANDEL, S.N. & CLEMANTS, S.E. 2007. Fruit
type, life form and origin determine the success of woody plant
invaders in an urban landscape. Biological Invasions 9: 465-475.
BESTER, S.P., STEYN, H.M. & KOEKEMOER, M. 2008. National
plant collecting programme: is it worth the trouble? Progress on
collection in Tankwa Karoo and Namaqua National Parks. South
African Journal of Botany 74: 385.
BOLUND, P. & HUNHAMMAR, S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban
areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293-301 .
CILLIERS, S.S. 1998. Phytosociological studies of urban open spaces
in Potchefstroom, North West Province. South Africa. Ph.D. the-
sis, PU for CHE, Potchefstroom.
CILLIERS, S.S. 2010. Social aspects of urban biodiversity: overview.
In N. Muller, P. Werner & J. Kelcey, Urban biodiversity and
design — implementing the convention on biological diversity' in
towns and cities'. 81-100. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
CLARKE, K.R. & GORLEY, R.N. 2001. PRIMER v.5: User manual/
tutorial. Primere Publishers, Plymouth.
COLDING, .1. 2007. ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for build-
ing resilience in ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 8 1 :
46-55.
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (ESRI).
2006. Arc View 9.2. www.esri.com. Redlands, USA.
GASTON, K.J., WARREN, P.H., THOMPSON, K. & SMITH, R.M.
2005. Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource
and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:
3327-3349.
GERM1SHUIZEN, G„ MEYER, N.L., STEENKAMP, Y. & KEITH, M.
(eds). 2006. A checklist of South African plants. Southern Afri-
can Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 41. SABONET,
Pretoria.
GLEN, H.F. 2002. Cultivated plants of southern Africa. Jacana, Johan-
nesburg.
GODEFROID, S. & KOEDAM, N. 2007. Urban plant species patterns
are highly driven by density and function of built-up areas. Land-
scape Ecology 22\ 1227-1239.
HAMILTON, H.R. 1999. The case for abundant species management.
Human Dimensions of Wildlife 4: 74-85.
HAWAIIAN ECOSYSTEMS AT RISK. 2010. Hawaiian Ecosystems at
Risk Project, http://www.hear.org/ (accessed 3 Feb. 2010).
HENDERSON, L. 2001 . Alien weeds and invasive plants. Agricultural
Research Council, Pretoria.
HODK1NSON. D.J. & THOMPSON, K. 1997. Plant dispersal: the role
of man. Journal of Applied Ecology’ 34: 1484-1496.
HOPE, D„ GRIES, C., CASAGRANDE, D„ REDMAN, C.L., GRIMM,
N.B. & MARTIN, C. 2006. Drivers of spatial variation in plant
diversity across the central Arizona-Phoenix system. Society and
Natural Resources 19: 101-116.
HOPE, D„ GRIES, C., ZHU, W„ FAGAN, W.F., REDMAN, C.L.,
GRIMM, N.B., NELSON, A.L., MARTIN, C. & KINZIG, A.
2003. Socio-economics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8788-8792.
ISAACSON, R.T. 2004. The Anderson Horticultural Libraiy’s source
list of plants and seeds: a completely revised listing of 2000-2003
catalogues , edn 6. Anderson Horticultural Library, Chanhassen,
USA.
JHA, S. & BAWA, K.S. 2006. Population growth, human development,
and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology
20: 906-912.
.IOFFE, P. 2007. Skeppende tuinmaak met inheemse plante: 'n Suid-
Afrikaanse gids. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
KUHN, 1., BRANDL, R. & KLOTZ, S. 2004. The flora of German cit-
ies is naturally species rich. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:
749-764.
LUBBE, C.S., SIEBERT, S.J. & CILLIERS, S.S. 2010. Political lega-
cy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban
domestic gardens along a socio-economic gradient. Scientific
Research and Essays, 5: 2900-2910.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
361
MACAULAY, D., BUCHANAN, N„ BURTON, R. & MURPHY, M.
2009. RHS plant finder 2009-2010. Dorling Kindersley, London.
MANGOLD, S., MOMBERG, M. & NEWBERY, R. 2002. Biodiversity
and conservation. In S. Mangold & M. Kalule-Sabiti, North West
Province State of the Environment Report. 1-106. Department of
Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Mafikeng.
MARCO, A., DUTOIT, T„ DESCHAMPS-COTTIN, M„ MAUFFREY,
J„ VENNETIER, M. & BERTAUDIERE-MONTES, V. 2008.
Gardens in urbanizing rural areas reveal an unexpected floral
diversity related to housing density. Comptes Rendus Biologies
331: 452 — 465.
MATHIEU, R., FREEMAN, C. & ARYAL, J. 2007. Mapping private
gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very
high-resolution satellite imagery. Landscape and Urban Plan-
ning81: 179-192.
MATSON, P.A., PARTON, W.J., POWER, A.G. & SWIFT, M.J. 1997.
Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science
211: 504-509.
MCKINNEY, M.L. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness:
a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11: 161-176.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. 2003. Ecosystems and
human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press.
Washington DC.
MOLEBATSI, L.Y., SIEBERT, S.J., CILLIERS, S.S., LUBBE, C.S. &
DAVOREN, E. 2010. The Tswana tshimo: a home garden system
of useful plants with a particular layout and function. African
Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 2952-2963.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD. M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
NIINEMETS, 0. & PENUELAS, J. 2008. Gardening and urban land-
scaping: significant players in global change. Trends in Plant Sci-
ence 13: 60-65.
PICKETT, S.T.A., CADENASSO, M.L., GROVE, J.M., NILON, C.H.,
POUYAT, R.V., ZIPPERER, W.C. & COSTANZA, R. 2001.
Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical
and socio-economic components of metropolitan areas. Annual
Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 127-1 57.
PIENAAR, K. 1994. The ultimate southern African gardening book.
Southern Book Publishers, Pretoria.
PIENAAR, K. 2000. The South African what flower is that? Struik,
Cape Town.
PIMENTEL, D„ LACH, L„ ZUNIGA, R. & MORRISON. D. 2000.
Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in
the United States. BioScience 50: 53-65.
RAIMONDO, D„ VON STADEN, L„ FODEN, W„ VICTOR. J.E.,
HELME, N.A., TURNER, R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MANYA-
MA, P. A. 2009. Red List of South African plants 2009. Strelitzia
25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
REBELE, F. 1994. Urban ecology and special features of urban eco-
systems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters A: 173-187.
RICHARDSON, D.M., ROUGET, M„ RALSTON, S.J., COWLING,
R.M., VAN RENSBURG, B.J. & THUILLER, W. 2005. Species
richness of alien plants in South Africa: environmental correlates
and the relationship with indigenous plant species richness. Eco-
science 12: 391-402.
RICHARDSON, D.M. & VAN WILGEN, B.W. 2004. Invasive alien
plants in South Africa: how well do we understand the ecological
impacts? South African Journal of Science 100: 45-52.
SAVARD, J.L., CLERGEAU, P. & MENNECHEZ, G. 2000. Biodi-
versity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban
Planning 48: 131-142.
SIEBERT, S.J., ZOBOLO, A.M. & DO WE, J.L. 2010. Livistona chinen-
sis: a first record of a naturalized palm in South Africa. Bothalia
40: 55-57.
SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, B-E. 2008. Guide to garden succulents.
Briza Publications, Pretoria.
SMITH, R.M., THOMPSON, K„ HODGSON, J.G., WARREN, P.H.
& GASTON, K.J. 2006. Urban domestic gardens IX: composi-
tion and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for
native biodiversity. Biological Conservation 129: 312-322.
SNYMAN, H. 2009. Top 20 SA plant families (accessed 4 Dec. 2009).
H.Snyman@sanbi.org.za.
SOUTH AFRICA. 1983. Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act of
1983. Government Printer, Pretoria.
SULLIVAN, J.J., TIMMINS, S.M. & WILLIAMS, P.A. 2005. Movement
of exotic plants into coastal native forests from gardens in north-
ern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 29: 1-10.
THOMPSON, K„ AUSTIN, K.C., SMITH, R.M., WARREN, P.H.,
ANGOLD, P.G. & GASTON, K.J. 2003. Urban domestic gar-
dens I: putting small-scale plant diversity in context. Journal of
Vegetation Science 14: 71-78.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA).
2009. Plants database, http://www.plants.usda.gov/ (accessed 3
Feb. 2010).
VAN JAARS VELD, E. 2001. Shaped by suffering. Veld & Flora 87: 16-19.
VAN WYK, B.-E. & GERICKE, N. 2000. People’s plants: a guide to
useful plants of southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
WILLIAMS, J.W., SEABLOOM, E.W., SLAYBACK, D„ STOMS,
D.M. & V1ERS, J.H. 2005. Anthropogenic impacts upon plant
species richness and net primary productivity in California. Ecol-
ogy Letters 8: 127-137.
WORKWELL. 2004. Potchefstroom socio-economic survey. Work Well
research unit for people, policy and performance, Potchefstroom.
WU, J., JENERETTE, G.D. & DAVID, J. 2003. Linking land-use
change with ecosystem processes: a hierarchical patch dynamic
model. In S. Guhathakurta, Integrated land use and environmen-
tal models: 99-119. Springer, Berlin.
■
Bothalia 41,2: 363 (2011)
Miscellaneous notes
TRIBUTE TO BEVERLEY MOMBERG, TECHNICAL EDITOR rN THE PUBLICATIONS SECTION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN
NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE
Over the past nearly 30 years, Mrs Beverley Momb-
erg — or Bev, as everyone calls her — has been involved
in the Publications Section of the South African National
Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), particularly as technical
editor of Bothalia and also other scientific series. She
will be retiring from this position on 31 October 2011.
This issue of Bothalia is therefore the final one to which
she will be applying her technical editing skills as a ten-
ured staff member. During her career at SANBI, Bever-
ley tirelessly worked on improving texts submitted for
publication in a range of SANBI’s scientific, technical,
semi-scientific and popular series.
Beverley Ann Momberg (nee Paola) was born on 10
October 1946 in Pretoria. She attended the Loreto Con-
vent, Hillcrest, Pretoria, matriculating in 1963. She then
went on to the University of Pretoria where she com-
pleted a B.Sc. degree in 1967, majoring in Entomology
and Zoology. After she completed her undergraduate
studies, she took a job in Johannesburg in the field of
medical research with the identification of disease vec-
tors as one of her responsibilities.
After her marriage in 1969, the next eleven years
were spent at home rearing two sons and a daughter.
When the youngest child was ready for school, she took
a job in Pretoria in 1980, working with Dr Bernard de
Winter, the then Director of the Botanical Research
Institute (BRI), one of the forerunners of SANBI,
assisting with arrangements for the 10th AETFAT Con-
gress that was held in Pretoria in January 1982, and of
which Dr De Winter was the Secretary-General. After
the Congress, she worked with Dr Donald Killick, at
the time Deputy Director and editor of the BRI’s scien-
tific publications, in producing the AETFAT Congress
Proceedings that eventually appeared in volume 14 of
Bothalia in 1983. Most of Bev’s career of 31 years, in
first the BRI, later the National Botanical Institute, cur-
rently SANBI, has therefore been spent in the technical
editing of scientific publications. During this time she
worked with the several scientific editors of the follow-
ing: Bothalia, Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa, Flora of southern Africa, Strelitzia and SANBI
Biodiversity > Series, namely Dr Killick, Dr Otto A. Leist-
ner (Smith 1998) and Mr Gerrit Germishuizen (Smith
2011), which allowed her to further develop her love of,
and natural capabilities in, the written and spoken word,
which was fostered in her while attending school at the
Loreto Convent. She was responsible for every stage in
the production o ^ Bothalia for the last 24 years.
Authors who submitted texts to, and saw them pub-
lished in a range of SANBI’s publication series, owe a
debt of gratitude to Beverley for having competently
polished and delivered their written effusions to the
world. Many people — not only authors — make the pub-
lication of a book or journal a reality. It may not be
common practice to acknowledge the work of technical
editors, but in the case of Beverley Momberg it is more
than appropriate.
In many respects, the end of the first and beginning
of the second decades of the 21st Century is ringing in
changes for components of SANBI’s suite of scientific
and other publications. With the retirement of Bever-
ley and, a year ago, Gerrit Germishuizen (Smith 2011),
an era of high-quality, in-house science publishing has
come to an end.
REFERENCES
SMITH, G.F. 1998. New editor for Bothalia. Bothalia 28: 113-115.
SMITH, G.F. 2011. Tribute to Gerrit Germishuizen, editor of Bothalia.
Bothalia 41 : 229.
G.F. SMITH*
* Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections, South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria /
H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, Uni-
versity of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria / Centre for Functional Ecology, De-
partamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455
Coimbra, Portugal (email: g.smith@sanbi.org.za).
Bothalia 41,2: 365-368 (2011)
OBITUARY
FRANZ SEBASTIAN MULLER (1913-2010)
On 22 May 2010, Dr Franz Sebastian Muller (Figure
1 ) passed away in Pretoria at the grand old age of 97,
following medical treatment for mild bladder cancer.
His passing went almost unnoticed in botanical circles,
although he was one of South Africa’s pioneers in the
field of plant cytogenetic research. This is perhaps not
surprising as he left the field of botany in 1946, shortly
after obtaining a Doctor Scientiae (D.Sc.) degree in
botany from the University of Pretoria. He then went on
to the University of Cape Town to study medicine, and
eventually carved out a successful career stretching over
40 years in private medical practice, hospital adminis-
tration, and provincial health services. Franz’s second
name has sometimes in error been spelled with two ‘a’s
[Sebastiaan] and at other times with a ‘z’ replacing the
second ‘s’ [Sebaztian], and his surname with a ‘u’, rather
than a ‘ii’, mainly because in years gone by, standard
typewriters did not easily type a ‘ii’, but correctly, his
name was Franz Sebastian Muller.
Franz Sebastian Muller was born on 16 February
1913 in Heilbron, a small town in the Free State Prov-
ince (then the Orange Free State) of South Africa, the
oldest child of Edward Julius Frances Muller and Anna
Margaretha Muller (nee Swart). As a child he moved
with his parents first to Petrus Steyn and later to Frank-
fort in the Free State. He attended school there and
eventually wrote the final matriculation examination in
1930. Interestingly, he initially failed matric because he
misread the time that the German examination started.
He therefore had to rewrite, and passed the German
examination in February 1931. After having completed
secondary school, Franz initially did not have sufficient
resources to enter university and worked in Frankfort for
two years, one year of which was spent working for a
law firm in the town.
He eventually managed to afford university tuition
and, starting in February 1933, registered for a B.Sc.
degree at the then Potchefstroom University for Chris-
tian Higher Education (PUCHE) in Potchefstroom, now
the Potchefstroom campus of the North-West Univer-
sity. During his first year, as part of the informal initia-
tion process for new and first-year students, he was the
‘slave’ allocated to senior student Hennie Bredell, who
was then reading for a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree.
Although not mentioned in Gunn & Codd (1981),
Bredell apparently later worked at the National Her-
barium in Pretoria for a short while. While engaged in
his undergraduate studies, Muller had more than a pass-
ing interest in geology and indicated, at the end of his
second study year, that he considered relocating to the
then University of the Orange Free State, where this
discipline was taught for degree purposes. However,
the PUCHE had no intention of allowing Muller, a very
promising student, to depart from their campus in Potch-
efstroom. To retain him. they rather started lectures in
geology and, at the beginning of 1935, a course in this
discipline, which resulted in the establishment of the
Department of Geology. Muller took botany, geology
and zoology as his major final-year subjects, and com-
pleted his degree in the first class. Throughout his under-
graduate study years at the PUCHE he was awarded
merit bursaries for academic achievement, and in 1935
he completed his B.Sc. studies. He was then awarded
one of 10 national bursaries available to students who
excelled in their undergraduate studies. The bursary,
with a value of £80.00, enabled Franz to enroll for a
master’s degree in botany at the PUCHE in 1935.
For his Masters study, Franz worked on the genus
Sporobohis R.Br. (Poaceae), on which he conducted
systematic studies with emphasis on leaf anatomy. He
worked under the tutelage of Prof. A.P. [Antonie Petrus
Gerhardus] Goossens, who at the time was attached to
the PUCHE. Prof. Goossens is perhaps best known
for his Afrikaans text books on botanical terminology
(Goossens 1950 and several later editions) and the tax-
onomy of the southern African flora (Goossens 1963).
An M.Sc. degree was awarded to Muller in 1936. During
his Masters studies he also did relief teaching in biology
(Muller 2005).
FIGURE 1. — Franz Sebastian Muller (1913-2010) photographed in
1942 at the time of his D.Sc. graduation ceremony at the Uni-
versity of Pretoria.
366
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
Based on his academic achievements, Muller was
thereafter awarded a Von Humboldt Stipendium by the
Deutscher Austausch Dienst, and on 1 March 1937 he
departed for Europe on board the steamboat S.S. Usa-
ramo , with the intention of doing a doctorate in plant
sciences in Germany (Figure 2). However, the looming
Second World War resulted in his immediate return to
South Africa in April 1937, a few years before hostili-
ties broke out between Nazi Germany and the Allies, on
whose side South Africa joined the war effort. On his
return to South Africa he obtained work as a clerk of the
court in Frankfort. The money he saved during his eight-
month employment in Frankfort enabled him to return to
the PUCHE where he registered for a diploma in edu-
cation. After he completed the diploma he took a job as
science and accountancy teacher at the secondary school
in Zeerust, and from there accepted a similar position at
a school in Durban, Natal, now KwaZulu-Natal. How-
ever, when he arrived at the school in Durban, he was
informed that he would have to teach English to pri-
mary school learners, and he immediately turned down
the appointment and returned to Frankfort. Some time
after his return to South Africa, following his abortive
journey to Germany, he realised with dismay that the
research he conducted towards his Masters thesis had
been published by his supervisor. Prof. Goossens (Goos-
sens 1938). Muller’s name was relegated to the terse
acknowledgement for ‘...his willing assistance in carry-
ing out most of the anatomical researches’.
During the course of 1939, while teaching at the
Hoerskool Zeerust, he registered for a D.Sc. degree
at the University of Pretoria. Muller initially started
this doctoral research at the PUCHE at the time that he
was registered there for a Teaching Diploma, but was
informed by the Registrar of the University that it would
not be possible to be registered simultaneously for two
academic qualifications. Muller then contacted Prof. B.
Elbrecht who was attached to the Department of Botany
of the University of Pretoria and informed him that he
would like to work on the cytology of the African flag-
ship plant genus. Aloe L., for his D.Sc. dissertation. (It
should be noted that at that time, the University awarded
D.Sc. degrees and not Ph.D. degrees) At the time, the
Head of the Department of Botany was Prof. Hans
(H.G.W.J.) Schweickerdt, who is credited as the founder
of modern plant systematics at the University of Pretoria
(Rourke 1999). Muller’s research proposal was accepted
and he started collecting material of aloes on the kop-
pies around Zeerust and further afield in South Africa.
At the time, one of the few books available on aloes
(and other monocot groups) was Flora capensis, vol-
ume VI, Haemodoraceae to Liliaceae (Figure 3). Dr I.B.
Pole Evans, an early director of what is now part of the
South African National Biodiversity Institute, also had
more than a passing interest in the genus, and he col-
lected aloes from various parts of South Africa for cul-
tivation in the garden at the National Herbarium, which
at the time was situated just below the Union Buildings
in Pretoria. Mtiller eventually also obtained living mate-
rial for his cytological work from this garden. The doyen
of aloe research at the time was Dr G.W. Reynolds and
Mtiller credits him as having been very supportive of his
research, for example through providing research mate-
rial from his garden. When Muller graduated, Reynolds
had projection slides made of some of Midler’s chromo-
some plates for use during lectures, and donated these to
Mii Her.
In August 1940, Midler was contacted by Dr E.P.
Phillips, then Chief of the Division of Botany and Plant
Pathology in Pretoria, who offered him an appoint-
ment in the Department of Agriculture in Pretoria. He
resigned his post as teacher in Zeerust and accepted the
job offer. While working in the Department, he contin-
ued with his doctoral research and it was in the labo-
ratories at the Prinshof Agricultural Research Station,
not far from Pretoria’s central business district, that he
refined the cytogenetic methodologies required to study
the chromosomes of Aloe species. This work was mostly
conducted after hours as his day job was to carry out
genetic research on agricultural crops. Here he met and
collaborated with fellow geneticist. Dr Leslie [L.E.W.]
Codd, who was later to become Director of the Botani-
cal Research Institute (BRI), now also part of the South
African National Biodiversity Institute. A search in the
Pretoria, National Herbarium (PRE) Computerised
Information System (PRECIS) for specimens collected
by F.S. Muller, did not yield any results. However, in
the 1940s, Dr Codd jointly collected several specimens
FIGURE 2.— On 1 March 1937
Franz S. Muller departed
for Germany aboard the
S.S. Usaramo to conduct
his doctoral studies in Ger-
many.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
367
Systematic Description of f&c
CAPE COLONY, CAFFRARIA, & PORT NATAL
(AND NEIGHBOURING TERRITORIES)
VARIOUS BOTANISTS.
BD1TSD BY
W. T. TIIISELTON-DY'ER, C.M.G., C.T.E., LL.D., F.R.8.
DIRECTOR, ROYAL GARDENS, KEET.
PttblisKtil under the authority of the Governments of the
Cape of Good Hope anil Natal.
VOLUME VI.
Il.T.M ODOR A CEJE TO L1LIACEJE.
LONDON
L. REEVE & CO., 6, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN.
^publishers to the Dome, Colonial, Jc Endian Gobmrmcnts.
1896-1897.
FIGURE 3. — Flora capensis, volume VI, Haemodoraceae to Liliaceae,
was one of the few books available on Aloe (and other monocot
groups for that matter) when Franz S. Muller started his work on
the cytology of the genus. This copy belonged to and was signed
by Muller’s D.Sc. supervisor. Prof. B. Elbrecht, at the University
of Pretoria, and it is likely that Muller consulted this work.
with an ‘F. Muller’ and an 'S. Muller’ in northern South
Africa, the Western Cape and Swaziland. Some of these
specimens are of grasses, but none are of aloes. Both
these Mullers could well have been F.S. Muller, given
that he often accompanied Dr Codd on trips to agricul-
tural research facilities in what was then the Eastern
Transvaal [Mpumalanga] and Natal [KwaZulu-Natal]
(Muller 2005). However, no specimens collected by
Muller could be traced in the H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt
Herbarium of the Department of Plant Science of the
University of Pretoria.
Four years before Muller’s D.Sc. dissertation was
published by the University of Pretoria (Muller 1945),
the first Afrikaans book on aloes appeared under the
authorship of Barend Hermanus (Ben) Groenewald
(Groenewald 1941). It was also the first book on the
genus published in South Africa, indeed in Africa
(Anonymous 2010). In the 1930s and 1940s Groenewald
described several new taxa in Aloe and had a special
interest in the spotted aloes (Verdoom 1966; Glen et al.
1995). Groenewald completed his undergraduate studies
at the University of Pretoria, obtaining a B.Sc. in Nat-
ural Sciences in 1932. His book on aloes was intended
as fulfilling part of the degree requirements for a M.Sc.
degree at the University of Pretoria, also under the tute-
lage of Prof. Elbrecht, a degree that he obtained in 1942,
in the same year that Muller obtained his D.Sc. (Figure
1). Significantly, as far as we could ascertain, Muller
does not mention, nor anywhere references, the work
of Groenewald in his dissertation (Muller 1945). Muller
must have been aware of Groenewald ’s work, which
contained a significant section on the cytology of some
representatives of the genus Aloe, and it remains a mys-
tery as to why it was not cited. Similarly, Groenewald
(1941) does not refer to the cytological work of Muller,
which he in tum must have been aware of when he did
his research in the same University Department, and
under the same supervisor. Nevertheless, it is possible
that both were working some distance away from the
University and, with little contact with their supervisor,
they may well have been unaware of the other’s work.
In the present age of instant connectivity to virtually any
place, or anyone, around the world, through the global
electronic ether, such a situation is difficult to fathom.
At the time that Groenewald and Muller conducted
their work on the chromosomes of the aloes in South
Africa, Prof. Dr Flavio P. de Resende (1907-1967), also
a well-known student of the genus in the 1940s, inde-
pendently conducted his pioneering cytological research
on these plants and their relatives, especially haworthias
(see for example Resende 1943 and Riley & Majumdar
1979 for references). Resende was a Professor of bot-
any at the University of Lisbon from 1943 to 1967 and
Director of this University's Botanical Garden (Smith &
Figueiredo 2011).
Resulting from his cytological work on Aloe, Muller
drew attention to the variation encountered in the chro-
mosome numbers of the morphologically similar-look-
ing Aloe ciliaris Haw. and A. ciliaris var. tidmarshii
Schonland. He found that A. ciliaris was a hexaploid (2/7
= 42), whereas var. tidmarshii was a normal diploid (2/7
= 14). This prompted him to raise A. tidmarshii to the
rank of species, as A. tidmarshii (Schonland) F.S. Mull.
Confirmation of the existence of an intermediate tetra-
ploid (2/? = 28) resulted in the reinstatement of A. tid-
marshii as a variety, and the establishment of A. ciliaris
var. redacta S. Carter (Brandham & Carter 1990). This
classification is widely followed today. Interestingly,
Resende (1938) recorded a pentaploid (2/7 = 35), infor-
mally referred to as ‘forma gigas’, in the A. ciliaris
complex. Miiller was, however, unable to obtain fertili-
zation from deliberate crosses he attempted between A.
ciliaris and A. tidmarshii. Well-known botanical artist,
Ms Cythna Letty, did a painting of A. tidmarshii, and a
reproduction appeared in Muller’s dissertation.
After completing his botanical studies, Muller
applied for a position at the Division of Botany
and Plant Pathology of the Department of Agricul-
ture and Forestry, now also part of the South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute. Possibly as a
result of lingering anti-German sentiments in South
Africa, Muller was not appointed to the Division of
Botany. Convinced that he had been rejected in favour
of a candidate with less qualifications but whose
appointment was politically correct, Muller became
disillusioned with the lack of progress in his career
as a research botanist. He then registered for medi-
cine at the University of Cape Town and completed the
degree MBChB in 1949, so realizing a long-held dream
to enter the field of medical practice.
368
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prof. A.E. [Braam] van Wyk of the Department of
Plant Science, University of Pretoria, is thanked for
assistance with tracing information on Dr F.S. Muller.
Ms Magda Nel kindly searched for specimens collected
by F.S. Muller in the H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium
of the Department of Plant Science at the University of
Pretoria. Ms Yolande Steenkamp kindly searched the
PRECIS database for Muller specimens in PRE. Ms
Marysia Brodalka and Ms Margaret Pick are thanked
for searching the University of Pretoria archives for
information on Dr F.S. Muller and his contemporary,
Mr B.H. Groenewald. Dr Edward J. Muller, son of Dr
F.S. Muller, is thanked for providing information on his
father.
REFERENCES
ANONYMOUS. 2010. Overlooked by history? Barend Hermanus
Groenewald (Ben) 21-6 [7?]- 1905 to 24-9-1976. Aloe 47: 57-59.
BRANDHAM, P.E. & CARTER, S. 1990. A revision of the Aloe tid-
marshii / A. ciliaris complex in South Africa. Kew Bulletin 45:
637-645.
GLEN, H.F., SMITH, G.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1995. Asphodelaceae/
Aloaceae. Typification of Aloe species described by B.H.
Groenewald. Bothalia 25: 97-99.
GOOSSENS, A.R 1938. A study of the South African species of Spo-
robolus R.Br. with special reference to leaf anatomy. Transac-
tions of the Royal Society of South Africa 26: 1 73—223 .
GOOSSENS, A.P. 1950. Lvs van terme in die plantkunde. Engels-Afri-
kaans. Fakulteit Natuurwetenskap en Tegniek. Saamgestel in
opdrag van die Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en
Kuns. Die Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Runs,
Pretoria.
GOOSSENS, A. 1963. Taksonomie van die angiosperms. Pro Rege-
pers, Potchefstroom.
GROENEWALD, B.H. 1941. Die aalwyne van Suid-Afrika, Suidwes-
Afrika, Portugees Oos-Afrika. Swaziland, Basoetoeland, en 'n
spesiale ondersoek van die k/assifikasie, chromosome and areale
van die Aloe Maculatae. Nasionale Pers, Bloemfontein.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
MU[U]LLER, F.S. [Sebaztian], 2005. Outobiografie van Franz Sebasfz]
tian Mu[ii]ller vanaf 1913 tot 2005. Unpublished, typed manu-
script, in Afrikaans, covering the first 92 years of the life of F.S.
Muller, Pretoria.
RESENDE, F. 1938. Gigas — Formen mit geringerer Chromosomenzahl
als die Stammarten. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Ge-
sellschaft 56: 533-542.
RESENDE, F. 1943. Suculentas africanas III. Contribuifao para o estu-
do da morfologia, da fisiologia da flora?ao e da geno-sistematica
das Aloineae. Memdrias da Sociedade Broteriana vol. 11: 5-119.
RILEY, H.P. & MAJUMDAR, S.K. 1979. The Aloineae. A biosvstem-
atic survey. The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
ROURKE, J.P 1999. Plant systematics in South Africa: a brief historical
overview, 1753-1 953. Transactions of the Royal Society’ of South
Africa 54: 179-190.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUE1REDO, E. 2011. Provenance of the material on
which the name Aloe mendesii Reynolds (Asphodelaceae), a cliff-
dwelling species from Angola, is based. Bradleya 29: in press.
VERDOORN, I.C. 1966. Hedendaagse plantkundiges en plantversame-
laars. 1 . Frederick Ziervogel van der Merwe. Bothalia 8 ( Bylaag
No. 1): 59, 60.
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS OF FRANZ SEBASTIAN MULLER
MULLER, F.S. [Sebastiaan] 1936. 'n Sistematiese studie van die Suid-
Afrikaanse materiaal van die geslag Sporobolus R.Br. met spe-
siale verwysing na die anatomie van die blare. M.Sc. thesis,
Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoer Onderwys,
Potchefstroom [now the Potchefstroom campus of the North-
West University].
MULLER, F.S. [Sebastian] 1945. ’n Chromosoomstudie van 'n aantal
spesies van die genus Aloe Linn., met spesiale verwysing na die
morfologie en betekenis van die somatiese chromosome. Publi-
kasies van die Universiteit van Pretoria. Reeks II: Nartuurweten-
skappe No. 8. Universiteit van Pretoria, Pretoria. [Submitted in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the D.Sc. degree in the
Faculty of Mathematical and Natural Sciences of the University
of Pretoria.]
-1998. Child abuse. An educational and medical approach to impor-
tant issues and associated problems. A comprehensive scholarly,
absorbed treatise and sound common sense guide. Published by
the author, Pretoria.
G.F. SMITH* and E. FIGUEIREDO**
* Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections, South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag XI 01, 0001 Pretoria. /
H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, Uni-
versity of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria. / Centre for Functional Ecology, De-
partamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455
Coimbra, Portugal. Email: g.smith@sanbi.org.za.
** Department of Botany, P.O.Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropoli-
tan University, 6031 Port Elizabeth / Centre for Functional Ecology,
Departamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-
455 Coimbra, Portugal. Email: estrelafigueiredo@hotmail.com.
MS. received: 2011-03-15.
Bothalia 41,2: 369-376 (2011)
South African National Biodiversity Institute: publications
1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010
Compiler: Y. Steenkamp
ADAMS, T. 2010-04. Pelargonium denticulaium Jacq. (Geraniaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzatrica.com/plantnop/pelargdent.htm.
ADAMS, T. 2010-06. Pelargonium lanceolatum (Cav.) Kern (Gera-
niaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/pIantnop/pelarglanc.htm.
ADAMS, T. 2010-10. Pelargonium fruticosum (Cav.) Willd. (Gera-
niaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/pelargfruticosum.htm.
ADAMS, T. 2010-1 1 . Pelargonium vitifolium (L.) L’Her. (Geraniaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.pIantzafrica.com/plantnop/pelargvitifolium.htm.
ADAMS, T. 2010-12. Pelargonium papilionaceum (L.) L’Her. (Gera-
niaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/pelargpapil.htm.
BARNARD, P. & MIDGLEY, G.F. 2010. No going back for species
and ecosystems. Review: Heatstroke: nature in an age of glo-
bal warming, by Anthony Bamosky, 2009. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution 25: 9, 10.
BARNARD, P. & UNDERHILL, L.G. 2010. Climate change: biodiver-
sity on the move. Quest 6,2: 14—17.
BATES, M.F., PIETERSEN, D.W. & MEASEY, G.J. 2010. New amphis-
baenian records for the Northern Cape, South Africa. Navorsing
van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein 26,3: 61-72.
BESTER, S.P. 2010a. Brachystelma barberae: 'what’s in a name'? Tax-
onomy in Action 2010 : 3 1 .
http://www.bionet-intl.org/opencms/opencms/resourceCentre/
bionetOutreach/TiAPPT/index.html.
BESTER, S.P. 2010b. Pachypodium namaquanum : seeking refuge in a
changing world. Taxonomy in action 2010 : 3.
http://www.bionet-intl.org/opencms/opencms/resourceCentre/
bionetOutreach/TiAPPT/index.html.
BESTER. S.P. 2010-01. Orbea lutea (N.E.Br.) Bruyns subsp. lutea
(Apocynaceae). Internet 5 pp.
http://www.plantzaffica.com/plantnop/orbealutealutea.htm.
BESTER, S.P. 2010-1 la. Riocreuxia genus. Internet 5 pp.
http://www.plantzaffica.com/plantqrs/riocreuxia.htm.
BESTER, S.P. 2010-1 lb. Tavaresia barklyi ( Dyer) N.E.Br. (Apocynace-
ae). Internet 6 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planttuv/tavarbark.htm.
BLACKBURN, D.C., PETTORELLI, N„ KATZNER, T.. GOMPPER,
M.E., MOCK, K„ GARNER. T.W.J. & ALTWEGG, R. 2010.
Dying for conservation: eradicating invasive alien species in the
face of opposition. Animal Conservation 13: 227, 228.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S. 2010. A rare new species of Polhillia (Genisteae,
Fabaceae). South African Journal of Botany 76: 142-145.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S. 2010-06. Calobota cytisoides (P.J.Bergius) Eckl.
& Zeyh. (Fabaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/calobotacyt.htm.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S. & MANNING, J.C. 2010a. Inclusion of the genus
Jodrellia in Bulbine (Asphodeloideae, Asphodelaceae). Bothalia
40: 59.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S. & MANNING, J.C. 2010b. Notes on the genus
Trachyandra (Asphodelaceae: Asphodeloideae): a review of
the T. thyrsoidea group (Section Trachyandra ), including three
new species from the Northern Cape. South African Journal of
Botany 76: 499-510.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S. & MANNING, J.C. 2010c. Caesia sabulosa
(Hemerocallidaceae), a new species from the Greater Cape
Region of South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 76:
524-529.
BOATWRIGHT, J.S., TILNEY, P.M. & VAN WYK. B.-E. 2010. Tax-
onomy of Wiborgiella (Crotalarieae, Fabaceae), a genus endemic
to the Greater Cape Region of South Africa. Systematic Botany
35: 325-340.
BOHN, H„ PICKER, M„ KLASS, K.-D. & COLVILLE, J. 2010. A
jumping cockroach from South Africa, Saltoblattela montistabu-
laris, gen. nov., spec. nov. (Blattodea: Blattellidae). Arthropod
Systematics & Phytogeny 68: 53-69.
BWONG, B.A. & MEASEY, G.J. 2010. Diet composition of Xenopus
borealis in Taita Hills: effects of habitat and predator size. Afri-
can Journal of Ecology 48: 299-303.
CADMAN, M„ PETERSEN, C„ DRIVER, A., SEKHRAN, N„ MAZE,
K. & MUNZHEDZI, S. 2010. Biodiversity for development:
South Africa's landscape approach to conserving biodiversity
and promoting ecosystem resilience. South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
CARVALHEIRO, L.G., SEYMOUR, C.L., VELDTMAN, R. & NI-
CHOLSON, S. 2010. Pollination services decline with distance
from natural habitat even in biodiversity-rich areas Journal of
Applied Ecology 47 : 8 1 0-820.
CHEEK, M. 2010. Extending biodiversity conservation to our gardens.
The Conservatory Dec.: 34, 35.
CHEEK, M. 2010-09. Tabernaemontana elegans Stapf. (Apocynaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planttuv/taberelegans.htm.
COWELL, C. 20 1 0-02. Liparia angust folia (Eckl. & Zeyh. ) A.L.Schutte
(Fabaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/lipariaangust.htm.
COWELL, C. 2010-05a. Aster laevigatus (Sond.) Kuntze (Asteraceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/asterlaevigatus.htm.
COWELL, C. 2010-05b. Erepsia pillansii (Kensit) Liede (Mesembry-
anthemaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/erepsiapillan.htm.
COWELL, C. 2010-06. Marasmodes DC. (Asteraceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/marasmodes.htm.
CROUCH, N.R. 2010. An adaptation of Reyneke’s key to the genus
Eucomis. PlantLife 39 & 40: 45-52.
CROUCH, N.R., BEAUMONT, A. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. First descrip-
tion of female flowers of the dioecious Adenia fi-uticosa subsp.
trifoliata (Passifloraceae). Bothalia 40: 78-81.
CROUCH, N.R. & EDWARDS, R. 2010. First record of Geophila in
southern Africa (Rubiaceae). Bothalia 40: 70, 71.
CROUCH, N.R. & KLOPPER. R.R. 2010a. Notes on some naturalized
ferns of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal (Pteridophyta).
Bothalia 40: 71-75.
CROUCH, N.R. & KLOPPER, R.R. 2010b. Filmy ferns of southern
Africa: the genus Didymog/ossum. Pteridoforum 93: 1-3.
CROUCH, N.R., KLOPPER, R.R. & GLEN, H.F. 2010. The status of
rPleopodium in Africa (Pteridophyta, Polypodiaceae). Bothalia
40: 101, 102.
CROUCH, N.R. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. Abstract: The implications of
South Africa’s bioprospecting legislation (NEMBA, Act 10 of
2004): local lessons for global benefit. Planta Medica 76: 1 1 77.
CROUCH, N.R., SMITH, G.F. & KLOPPER. R.R. 2010. Abstract: A
brief history of Aloe discovery and popularisation in southern
Africa. In V.H. Jeannoda, S.G. Razafimandimbison & P. de
Block, Programme of the 19th AETFAT Congress, Madagascar,
25-30 April 2010. Scripta Botanica Belgica 46: 120.
CROUCH, N.R. & STYLES, D.G.A. 2010. The rediscovery in South
Africa of the neglected African vegetable Plectranthus esculen-
tus (Lamiaceae). Bothalia 40: 65-67 .
CROUCH, N.R., WILLIAMS, V.L., EDWARDS, T.J. & BRUETON,
V.J. 2010. Drimia cooperi in KwaZulu-Natal, and the ethnome-
dicinal trade (Hyacinthaceae). Bothalia 40: 75-78.
CROUCH, N.R. & WOLFSON, M.M. 2010. Complying with South
African bioprospecting laws: the case of the Pelargonium phyto-
medicine industry. In D. Phillips, Plants, people and nature. Ben-
efit sharing in practice : 153—160. AAMPS Publishing, Mauritius.
CUI, Y.H., GUO, R., DUNNE, T. & GUO, D. 2010. Decision theory
under general uncertainty. In K. Kolowrocki, J. Soszynska & E.
Zio, Proceedings of Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars,
vol. 1, 20-26 June 2010. Gsansk-Sopot, Poland'. 51-66.
CUI, Y.H., GUO, R. & GUO, D. 2010a. Lambda algorithm. Journal of
Uncertain Systems 4: 22-33.
http://www.worldacademicunion.com/journal/jus/jusVol04No
lpaper03.pdf.
370
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
CU1. Y.H., GUO, R. & GUO, D. 2010b. Union crisp fuzzy set in algo-
rithm. In D.A. Ralexcu, J. Peng & R. Guo, Proceedings of the 1st
International Conference on Uncertainty Theoiy (International
Consortium for Uncertainty Theoiy. ICUT 2010 http://orsc.edu.
cn/icut), 1 1-19 August 2010, Urumchi & Kashi. China : 232-240.
CUP1DO, C.N. 2010. A new species of Roella (Campanulaceae) from
the Western Cape, South Africa. Edinburgh Journal of Botany
67: 425-430.
CURTIS, S. & VILJOEN, C. 2010-09. Sclerochiton harveyamis Nees
(Acanthaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/scleroharv.htm.
CURTIS, S. & VILJOEN, C. 2010-11. Kraussia floribunda Harv.
(Rubiaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/kraussiaflori.htm.
DABUSH, J. 2010-04. Aloe commixta A. Berger (Asphodelaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/aloecommixta.htm.
DABUSH, J. 2010-05. Erica nana Salisb. (Ericaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericanana.htm.
DABUSH, J. 2010-1 1 . Erica nevillei L. Bolus (Ericaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericanevillei.htm.
DE SOUSA, F., FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. Cyphostemma
mendesii (Vitaceae), a new species from Angola. Phytotaxa 7:
35-39.
DRIVER, M„ RAIMONDO, D„ MAZE, K.. PFAB, M.F. & HELME,
N.A. 2009. Applications of the Red List for conservation prac-
titioners. In D. Raimondo, L. von Staden, W. Foden, J.E. Victor,
N.A. Heline, R.C. Turner, D.A. Kamundi & P.A. Manyama, Red
List of South African plants 2009. Strelitiia 25: 41-52. South
African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
DUCKWORTH, G„ ALTWEGG, R. & GUO, D. 2010. Soil moisture
limits foraging: a possible mechanism for the range dynamics of
the hadeda ibis in southern Africa. Diversity and Distributions
16: 765-772.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010a. Harveya purpurea. Curtis's Botanical Maga-
zine 26: 398—407.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010b. Ciyptostephanus densiflorus. Curtis's Botani-
cal Magazine 27: 10-22.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010c. Strumaria barbarae. Curtis’s Botanical Maga-
zine 27: 109-116.
DUNCAN, G.D. 201 Od. Heide van heinde en ver. Die Tuinier Feb.:
26-28.
DUNCAN, G.D. 20l0e. Pragtige pou-moraeas. Die Tuinier Apr.'. 26-28.
DUNCAN, G.D. 20 1 Of. Gloriemooi is onse ‘tibouchinas’. Die Tuinier
Jun.: 44, 45.
DUNCAN, G.D. 20 1 Og. ’n Trio van plaaslike lelies. Die Tuinier Aug:.
32,33.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010h. Sewejaartjies. Die Tuinier Okt.: 42—44.
DUNCAN, G.D. 201 Oi. Polygala. Die Tuinier Dec.: 46—48.
DUNCAN, G.D. 201 Oj. Grow bulbs, edn 2. Kirstenbosch Gardening
Series. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape
Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010k. The genus Ciyptostephanus Welw. ex Baker.
Herbertia 64: 136-149.
DUNCAN, G.D. 20101. Cultivation and propagation of Freesia species.
In J.C. Manning & P. Goldblatt, Botany and horticulture of the
genus Freesia (Iridaceae). Strelitzia 27: 96-103. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010m. Simply irresistible. The Gardener Feb.: 22-26.
DUNCAN. G.D. 2010n. Magnificent peacock moraeas. The Gardener
Apr.: 26-28.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010o. Our very own ‘tibouchinas’. The Gardener
Jun.: 40,41.
DUNCAN, G.D. 2010p. A trio of local lilies. The Gardener Aug.: 30,
31.
DUNCAN, G.D. 201 Oq. Everlastings. The Gardener Oct.: 42—44.
DUNCAN, G.D. 20 1 Or. Polygala. The Gardener Dec.: 46—48.
DUNCAN, G. 2010-09. Moraea aristata (D.Delaroche) Asch. &
Graebn. (Iridaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/moraeaaristata.htm.
ELLIS, L„ ASTHANA, A.K.. SAHU, V., BEDNAREK-OCHYRA,
B.H., OCHYRA, R„ CANO, M.J., COSTA, D.P., CYKOWSKA,
B„ PHILIPPOV, D.A., DULIN, M.V., ERZBERGER, P., LEB-
OUVIER, M„ MOHAMED, H., ORGAZ, J.D., PHEPHU, N„
VAN ROOY, J., STEBEL, A., SUAREZ, G.M., SCHIAVONE,
M.M., TOWNSEND, C.C., VANA, J., VONCINA, G„ TON-
GUE YAYINTA$, O., YONG, K.T. & ZANDER, R.H. 2010.
New national and regional bryophyte records. Journal of Bryol-
ogy 32: 3 1 1-322.
FELDHEIM, K.A., CHAUKE, L.F., HOPKINS, K. & TOLLEY, K.A.
2010. Characterization of microsatellite loci from a South
African endemic, the Cape Dwarf Chameleon (Bradypodion
pumilum). Conseiwation Genetics Resources 2: 165-168.
FIGUEIREDO, E., MOORE, G. & SMITH, G.F. 2010a. Latin diagno-
sis: time to let go. Taxon 59: 617-620.
FIGUEIREDO, E„ MOORE, G. & SMITH, G.F. 2010b. (1 1 5-1 16) Pro-
posals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publica-
tion of plant names. Taxon 59: 659, 660.
FIGUEIREDO, E„ MOORE, G. & SMITH, G.F. 2010c. Latin diag-
nosis: an unnecessary impediment — a response to Jorgensen.
Taxon 59: 1565, 1566.
FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010a. What’s in a name: epithets in
Aloe L. (Asphodelaceae) and what to call the next new species.
Bradleya 28: 79-102.
FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010b. The colonial legacy in Afri-
can plant taxonomy. South African Journal of Science 1 06, 3/4,
Art. #161 . Internet 4 pp. DOI: 1 0.4 1 02/sajs.v 1 06i3/4. 1 6 1 .
FONTAINE, M.C., TOLLEY, K.A., BIRKUN, A.J., FERREIRA,
M„ THIERRY, J., LLAVONA, A., OZTURK, B„ RIDOUX,
V., ROGAN, E„ SEQUEIRA, M., BOUQUEGNEAU, J.M.,
MICHAUX, J.R. & BAIRD, S.J.E. 2010. Climate change frag-
ments populations of a top cetacean predator. Proceedings of the
Royal Society: Biological Sciences 277: 2829-2836.
FORRESTER, J.A. 2010. First ever Biodiversity Festival at the Harold
Porter National Botanical Garden. Veld & Flora 96: 147.
FORRESTER, J.A. 2010-08. Protea angustata R.Br. (Proteaceae).
Internet 2 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/proteaangust.htm.
FORRESTER, J.A. 2010-11. Osmitopsis asteriscoides (P.J.Bergius)
Less. (Asteraceae). Internet 2 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/osmitopoaster.htm.
FRONEMAN, W.C.F. 2010-04. Barleria prionites L. subsp. delagoen-
sis (Oberm.) Brummitt & J.R.I.Wood (Acanthaceae). Internet 2
pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/barleriapriondel.htm.
FRONEMAN, W.C.F. 2010-09. Barleria lancifolia T. Anderson (Acan-
thaceae). Internet 2 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/barlerialanc.htm.
FUSI, F„ CAVALLI, M„ MULHOLLAND, D.A., CROUCH, N.R.,
COOMBES, P„ DAWSON, G„ BOVA, S„ SGARAGLI, G. &
SAPONARA, S. 2010. Cardamonin is a bifunctional vasodilator
that inhibits Ca l.2 current and stimulates K 1.1 current in rat
tail artery myocytes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimen-
tal Therapeutics 332: 531-540.
GLEN, H.F. 2010a. The Green Dragon: the answers. The Gardener Jan.:
72.
GLEN, H.F. 2010b. The Green Dragon: international celebrations. The
Gardener Feb.: 72.
GLEN, H.F. 2010c. The Green Dragon: what's for dinner? The Gar-
dener Mar.: 60.
GLEN, H.F. 2010d. The Green Dragon: plants from our neighbours. The
Gardener Apr: 60.
GLEN, H.F. 201 Oe. The Green Dragon: the ultimate nightmare invader.
The Gardener May: 80.
GLEN, H.F. 20 1 Of. The Green Dragon: day of the tree. The Gardener
Jun.: 80.
GLEN, H.F. 201 Og. The Green Dragon: who they were. The Gardener
J u 1 . : 80.
GLEN, H.F. 20 1 Oh. The Green Dragon: more sick tomatoes. The Gar-
dener Aug.: 88.
GLEN, H.F. 20 1 Oi. The Green Dragon: doctors' food. The Gardener
Sep.: 96.
GLEN, H.F. 20 1 Oj . The Green Dragon: a new species: what to do next.
The Gardener Oct: 120.
GLEN, H.F. 2010k. The Green Dragon: on being inconspicuous. The
Gardener Nov.: 120.
GLEN, H.F. 20101. The Green Dragon: party time. The Gardener Dec.:
86, 87.
GLEN, H.F. & GERM1SHUIZEN, G. Compilers. 2010. Botanical
exploration of southern Africa, edn 2. Strelitzia 26. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
GLEN, H.F. & GOVENDER, K. 2010. Mitriostigma axillare Hochst.
(Rubiaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/mitrioaxil.htm.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2010a. New taxa of Babiana (Iri-
daceae—Crocoideae) from coastal Western Cape, South Africa.
Bothalia 40: 47-53.
GOLDBLATT, P & MANNING, J.C. 2010b. Moraea intermedia and
M. vuvuzela (Iridaceae-lridoideae), two new species from west-
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
371
em South Africa, and some nomenclatural changes and range
extensions in the genus. Bothalia 40: 147-153.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2010c. Geosiris albiflora (Geo-
siridoideae) from the Comoro Archipelago (Iridaceae). Bothalia
40: 169-171.
GORDON, I.J.. PETTORELLI, N„ KATZNER, T„ GOMPPER, M.E.,
MOCK. K„ REDPARTH, S. & ALTWEGG, R. 2010. Interna-
tional year of biodiversity: missed targets and the need for better
monitoring, real action and global policy. Animal Conservation
13: 113, 114.
GRACE, O.M., SIMMONDS, M.S.J., SMITH. G.F. & VAN WYK,
A.E. 2010. Chemosystematic evaluation of Aloe section Pictae
(Asphodelaceae). Biochemical Svstematics and Ecology 38:
57-62.
GUO, D„ GUO, R., MIDGLEY, G.F., ALTWEGG. R. & FODEN, W.
2010. Future climate change impact on quiver tree in Namibia
and South Africa. In W. Duch, X. Zhao & J. Gao. Proceedings of
the 9th International Conference on Information and Manage-
ment Sciences, vol. 9, 11-19 August 2010, Mirage Hotel, Urum-
chi, China : 447^15 1 .
GUO, D„ KUHLMANN, M„ GUO, R.. VELDTMAN, R„ DONALD-
SON, J.S. & MIDGLEY, G.F. 2010a. Range shift of South Afri-
can Rediviva bee species under climate change impacts. Pro-
ceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Environmental
Science and Development (CESD). 26—28 February 2010, Sin-
gapore: 313-317. World Academic Union (World Academic
Press), England.
GUO. D., KUHLMANN, M„ GUO, R„ VELDTMAN. R„ DONALD-
SON, J.S. & MIDGLEY. G.F. 2010b. Future climate impact on
South African Rediviva bee species in the winter rainfall region.
In W. Duch, X. Zhao & J. Gao, Proceedings of the 9th Inter-
national Conference on Infomtation and Management Sciences,
vol. 9, 11-19 August 2010, Mirage Hotel, Urumchi, China.:
345-349.
GUO, R„ CUE Y.H., DUNNE, T. & GUO, D. 2010. The theoretical shell
for uncertainty decision analysis. In S. Chukova, J. Haywood & T.
Dohi, Advanced Reliability Modeling IV — beyond the traditional
reliability and maintainability approaches. Proceedings of the
4th Asia-Pacific International Symposium (APARM 2010), 2-4
December 2010, Wellington, New Zealand: 193-200. McGraw-
Hill International Enterprises, Taiwan.
GUO, R., CUL Y.H. & GUO. D. 2010a. Uncertainty decision theory. In
D. A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo, Proceedings of the 1st Interna-
tional Conference on Uncertainty Theory (International Consor-
tium for Uncertainty Theory: ICUT2010 http://orsc.edu.cn/icut),
11-19 August 2010, Urumchi & Kashi, China: 5-14.
GUO. R., CUI, Y.H. & GUO, D. 2010b. Reliability concept under
an uncertainty environment. In S. Chukova, J. Haywood & T.
Dohi, Advanced Reliability Modeling IV — beyond the traditional
reliability and maintainability approaches. Proceedings of the
4th Asia-Pacific International Symposium (APARM 2010), 2-4
December 2010, Wellington, New Zealand: 209—216. McGraw-
Hill International Enterprises, Taiwan.
GUO, R„ CUL Y.H. & GUO, D. 2010c. Uncertainty decision analysis.
In M.H. Ha, J. Peng & X.H. Yang, Proceedings of the 8th Annual
Conference on Uncertainty, 1-5 August 2010, Xi'an, China:
250-261. Global-Link Publishers. Hong Kong.
GUO. R„ CUL Y.H., THIART, C. & GUO, D. 2010a. Reliability con-
cept under general uncertainty. In K. Kolowrocki, J. Soszynska
& E. Zio, Proceedings of Summer Safety and Reliability Semi-
nars. vol. 1, Gsansk-Sopot, Poland, 20-26 June 2010: 105-114.
GUO, R.. CUI, Y.H., THIART. C. & GUO, D. 2010b. Hybrid reliabil-
ity modeling under general uncertainty. In K. Kolowrocki, J.
Soszynska & E. Zio, Proceedings of Summer Safety and Reli-
ability Seminars, vol. 1, Gsansk-Sopot, Poland, 20-26 June
2010: 115-122.
GUO, R„ DUNNE, T„ CUI, Y.H. & GUO, D. 2010. Quality concept
under an uncertainty environment. In S. Chukova, J. Haywood
& T. Dohi, Advanced Reliability Modeling IV — beyond
the traditional reliability and maintainability approaches.
Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific International Symposium
(APARM 2010), 2-4 December 2010, Wellington, New Zealand:
201-208. McGraw-Hill International Enterprises, Taiwan.
GUO, R., GUO, D. & CUI, Y.H. 2010a. Random fuzzy compound
poisson processes. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo, Proceed-
ings of the 1st International Conference on Uncertainty Theory
(International Consortium for Uncertainty Theory, ICUT2010
http://orsc.edu.cn/icut), 11-19 August 2010, Urumchi & Kashi,
China: 2 1 7-23 1 .
GUO, R., GUO, D. & CUI, Y.H. 2010b. Wave-like bathtub hazard
function. In W. Duch, X. Zhao & J. Gao, Proceedings of the
9th International Conference on Information and Management
Sciences, vol. 9, 11-19 August 2010, Mirage Hotel, Urumchi,
China.: 434^140.
GUO, R„ GUO, D„ CUI, Y.H. & DUNNE, T. 2010. Uncertain Bayes
measure. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo, Proceedings of
the 1st International Conference on Uncertainty Theory (Inter-
national Consortium for Uncertainty Theory, ICUT2010 http://
orsc.edu.cn/icut), 1 1-19 August 2010, Urumchi & Kashi, China:
63-78.
GUO, R., GUO, D. & DUNNE, T. 2010. Random fuzzy continuous-
time Markov jump processes. Reliability: Theory & Applications
17: 122-135.
http://gnedenko-forum.org/Joumal/20 1 0/0220 1 0/RTA_2_20 1 0-
13.pdf.
GUO, R., GUO, D. & THIART, C. 2010a. Liu's uncertain normal dis-
tribution. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo, Proceedings of
the 1st International Conference on Uncertainty Theory > (Inter-
national Consortium for Uncertainty Theory: ICUT2010 http://
orsc.edu.cn/icut), 11-19 August 2010, Urumchi & Kashi, China:
191-207.
GUO, R., GUO, D. & THIART, C. 2010b. Two-dimensional random
fuzzy poisson modeling. In W. Duch, X. Zhao & J. Gao, Pro-
ceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information and
Management Sciences, vol. 9, 11-19 A ugust 2010, Mirage Hotel,
Urumchi, China: 410^420.
GUO. R„ GUO, D„ THIART, C. & CUI, Y.H. 2010a. Essential form of
general uncertainty distributions. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R.
Guo, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Uncer-
tainty Theory (International Consortium for Uncertainty Theory,
ICUT20 1 0 http://orsc.edu.cn/icut), 11-19 August 2010, Urumchi
& Kashi, China: 171-183.
GUO, R„ GUO, D„ THIART, C. & CUI, Y.H. 2010b. Random fuzzy
poisson data modeling. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo,
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Uncertain-
ty Theory (International Consortium for Uncertainty Theory,
ICUT2010 http://orsc.edu.cn/icut), 11-19 August 2010, Urumchi
& Kashi, China: 264—275.
GUO, R., GUO, D. & ZHAO, R.Q. 2010. Hybrid lifetime distribution
with uncertain parameter. In D.A. Ralescu, J. Peng & R. Guo,
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Uncertain-
ty Theory (International Consortium for Uncertainty Theory,
ICUT2010 http://orsc.edu.cn/icut), 11-19 August 2010, Urumchi
<£ Kashi. China: 276-283.
GUO. R.. ZHAO, R.Q. & GUO, D. 2010. Random fuzzy location-scale
family with linear fuzzy location function. Journal of the Chi-
nese Institute of Industrial Engineers 27: 28-36.
HAARMEYER, D.H., LUTHER-MOSEBACH, J., DENGLER, J.,
SCHMIEDEL, U., FINCKH, M„ BERGER, K„ DECKERT,
J., DOMPTAIL, S.E., DREBER, N„ GIBREEL, T„ GRO-
HMANN, C., GRONGROFT, A., HAENSLER, A., HANKE,
W„ HOFFMANN, A., HUSTED, L.B., KANGOMBE, F.N.,
KEIL, M„ KRUG, C.B., LABITZKY, T., LINKE, T„ MAGER,
D„ MEY, W„ MUCHE, G., NAUMANN, C., PELLOWSKI,
M„ POWRIE, L.W., PROPPER, M., RUTHERFORD, M.C.,
SCHNEIDERAT, U„ STROHBACH, B.J., VOHLAND, K„
WEBER, B„ WESULS, D„ WISCH, U.. ZEDDA, L„ BUDEL,
B„ DARIENKO, T„ DEUTSCHEWITZ, K., DOJANI. S„
ERB, E., FALK, T„ FRIEDL, T„ KANZLER, S.-E., LIM-
PRICHT, C., LINSENMAIR, K.E., MOHR, K„ OLIVER, T„
PETERSEN, A„ RAMBOLD, G., ZELLER. U„ AUSTER-
MUHLE, R„ BAUSCH, J., BOSING, B.M., CLASSEN, N„
DORENDORF, J., DOR1GO, W„ ESLER. K.J., ETZOLD. S„
GRA1FF, A., GROTEHUSMANN, L„ HECHT, J., HOYER,
P„ KONGOR, R.Y., LANG, H„ LIECKFELD, L.A.B., OLD-
ELAND, J., PETERS, J., ROWER, I.U., SEPTEMBER, Z.M.,
SOP, T.K., VAN ROOYEN, M.W., WEBER, J., WILLER, J. &
JURGENS, N. 2010. The BIOTA Observatories. In N. Jurgens,
D.H. Haarmeyer, J. Luther-Mosebach, J. Dengler, M. Finckh &
U. Schmiedel, Biodiversity in southern Africa, vol. 1: patterns at
local scale: 6-801. Klaus Hess Publishers, Gottingen & Wind-
hoek.
HARROWER, A. 2010-02. Jamesbrittenia bergae P.Lemmer (Scrophu-
lariaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planthij/jamesberg.htm.
HARROWER. A. 2010-05. Plectranthus fruticosus L’Her. ‘Liana’
(Lamiaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/plectranfrutlian.htm.
372
HARROWER, A. 2010-11. Crassula mesembrianthemopsis Dinter
(Crassulaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/crassulamesemb.htm.
HARROWER, A. 2010-12. Crassula exilis Harv. (Crassulaceae). Inter-
net 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/crassulaexilis.htm.
HERMAN, RP.J. 2010-10. Gazania rigens (L.) Gaertn. var. leucolaena
(DC.) Roessler (Asteraceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/gazrigensleuco.htm.
HERRE, A. & MEASEY, G.J. 2010. The kinematics of locomotion in
caecilians: effects of substrate and body shape. Journal of Exper-
imental Zoology’ 313A: 301-309.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2010-01 . Erica baccans L. (Ericaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericabaccans.htm.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2010-07. Erica glauca Andrews var. glauca (Eri-
caceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericaglaubaglauba.htm.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2010-08. Mimetesfimbriifolius Salisb. ex Knight (Pro-
teaceae). Internet 4 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/
mimetesfim.htm.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2010-09. Erica curviflora L. (Ericaceae). Internet 3
pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericacurviflora.htm.
HITCHCOCK, A. 2010-10. Erica triflora L. (Ericaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/ericatriflora.htm.
HOFFMANN, M„ HILTON-TAYLOR, C., ANGULO, A., BOHM, M„
BROOKS, T.M., BUTCHART, S.H.M., CARPENTER, K.E.,
CHANSON, J„ COLLEN, B„ COX, N.A., DARWALL, W.R.T.,
DULVY, N.K., HARRISON, L.R., KATARIYA, V., POLLOCK,
C. M., QUADER, S„ RICHMAN, N.I., RODRIGUES, A.S.L.,
TOGNELL1, M.F., VIE, J.-C., AGUIAR, J.M., ALLEN, D.J.,
ALLEN, G.R., AMOR1, G„ ANANJEVA, N.B., ANDREONE,
F„ ANDREW, P, AQUINO ORTIZ, A.L., BAILLIE, J.E.M.,
BALDI, R„ BELL, B.D., BIJU, S.D., BIRD, J.P., BLACK-
DECIMA, P, BLANC, J.J., BOLANOS, F„ BOLIVAR-G, W„
BURFIELD, I.J., BURTON, J.A., CAPPER, D.R., CASTRO, F„
CATULLO, G., CAVANAGH, R.D., CHANNING, A., CHAO,
N.L., CHENERY, A.M., CHIOZZA, F„ CLAUSNITZER, V.,
COLLAR, N.J., COLLETT, L.C., COLLETTE, B.B., CORTEZ
FERNANDEZ, C.F., CRAIG, M.T., CROSBY, M.J., CUMBER-
LIDGE, N„ CUTTELOD, A., DEROCHER, A.E., DIESMOS,
A.C., DONALDSON, J.S., DUCKWORTH, J.W., DUTSON,
G„ DUTTA, S.K., EMSLIE, R.H., FARJON, A., FOWLER, S„
FREYHOF, J„ GARSHELIS, D.L., GERLACH, G., GOWER,
D. J., GRANT, T.D., HAMMERSON, G.A., HARRIS, R.B.,
HEANEY, L.R., HEDGES, S.B., HERO, J.-M., HUGHES, B„
HUSSAIN, S.A., ICOCHEA, M.J., INGER, R.F., ISHII, N„
ISKANDAR, D.T., JENKINS, R.K.B., KANEKO, Y„ KOT-
TELAT, M„ KOVACS, K.M., KUZMIN, S.L., LA MARCA,
E„ LAMOREUX, J.F., LAU, M.W.N., LAVILLA, E.O., LEUS,
K„ LEWISON, R.L., LICHTENSTEIN, G., LIVINGSTONE,
S. R., LUKOSCHEK, V., MALLON, D.P, MCGOWAN, P.J.K.,
MCIVOR, A„ MOEHLMAN, P.D., MOLUR, S„ MUNOZ
ALONSO, A., MUSICK, J.A., NOWELL, K„ NUSSBAUM,
R.A., OLECH, W., ORLOV, N.L., PAPENFUSS, T.J., PARRA-
OLEA, G„ PERRIN, W.F., POLIDORO, B.A., POURKAZE-
MI, M„ RACEY, P.A., RAGLE, J.S, RAM, M„ RATHBUN,
G., REYNOLDS, R.P., RHODIN, A.G.J., RICHARDS, S.J.,
RODRIGUEZ, L.O., RON, S.R., RON DIN IN I, C„ RYLANDS,
A.B., SADOVY DE MITCHESON, Y„ SANCIANGCO, J.C.,
SANDERS, K.L., SANTOS-BARRERA, G„ SCHIPPER, J„
SELF-SULLIVAN, C., SHI, Y„ SHOEMAKER, A., SHORT,
F.T., SILLERO-ZUBIRI, C„ SILVANO, D.L., SMITH, K.G.,
SMITH, A.T., SNOEKS, .1., STATTERSFIELD, A.J., SYMES,
A. J., TABER, A.B., TALUKDAR, B.K., TEMPLE, H.J., TIM-
MINS, R., TOBIAS, J.A., TSYTSULINA, K„ TWEDDLE, D„
UBEDA, C„ VALENTI, S.V., VAN DIJK, P.P., VEIGA, L.M.,
VELOSO, A., WEGE, D.C., WILKINSON, M., WILLIAM-
SON, E.A., XIE, F„ YOUNG, B.E., AKQAKAYA, H.R., BEN-
NUN, L„ BLACKBURN, T.M., BOITANI, L„ DUBLIN, H.T.,
DA FONSECA, G.A.B., GASCON, C., LACHER, T.E. JNR,
MACE, G.M., MAINKA, S.A., MCNEELY, J.A., MITTER-
MEIER, R.A., MCGREGOR REID, G., RODRIGUEZ, J.P,
ROSENBERG, A.A., SAMWAYS, M.J., SMART, J„ STEIN,
B. A. & STUART, S.N. 2010. The impact of conservation on the
status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330: 1 503-1509.
HOLSCHER, B. 2010a. Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sotid.)
T. D.Penn.: long plant names to twist tongues. Internet 1 pp. Tax-
onomy in Action 2010: 6.
http://chinabio.netl.tw/jessy/20101015.pdf.
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1)
HOLSCHER, B. 2010b. Celtis african Burm.f.: white stinkwood. Inter-
net 1 pp. Taxonomy in Action 2010: 16.
http://chinabio.net 1 .tw/jessy/20 1010 1 5.pdf.
HUNTLEY, B„ BARNARD,' P, ALTWEGG, R„ CHAMBERS, L„
BERNARD, W.T., COETZEE, L.G., HOCKEY, P.A.R., HOLE,
D.G., MIDGLEY, G„ UNDERHILL, L.G. & WILLIS, S.G.
2010. Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species’ range
and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change.
Ecographv 33: 621-626.
JELTSCH, F., BLAUM, N„ CLASSEN, N„ ESCHENBACH, A., GRO-
HMANN, C., GRONGROFT, A., JOUBERT, D.F., HORN, A.,
LOHMANN, D., LINSENMAIR, K.E., L0CK-VOGEL, M.,
MEDINSKI, T.V., MEYFARTH, S., MILLS, A., PETERSEN,
A., POPP, A., POSCHLOD, P„ REISCH, C., ROSSMANITH,
E„ RUBILAR, H„ SCHUTZE, S„ SEYMOUR, C., SIMMONS,
R„ SM1T, G.N., STROHBACH, M„ TEWS, .1., TIETJEN, B„
WESULS, D„ WICHMANN, M„ WIECZOREK, M. & ZIM-
MERMANN, I. 2010. Impacts of land use and climate change on
the dynamics and biodiversity in the Thombush Savanna Biome.
In M.T. Hoffman, U. Schmiedel & N. Jurgens, Biodiversity in
southern Africa, vol. 3: implications for land use and manage-
ment: 33-74. Klaus Hess Publishers, Gottingen & Windhoek.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010a. Salvinia molesta invades the Okavango.
Pteridoforum 92: 1,2.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010b. Review: Searching for ferns in Lesotho, by
G.A. Cooper-Driver, T. Letsela & M. Polaki, 2009. Pteridoforum
92: 2-6.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010c. Review: Biology and evolution of ferns and
lycophytes, edited by T.A. Ranker & C.H. Hauler, 2008. Pterid-
oforum 93: 8-13.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010d. Now you know!: Rolla Milton Tryon, Jnr.
(1916-2001) and Alice Elizabeth Faber Tryon (1920-2009).
Pteridoforum 93: 13—15.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010e. Terminology: the fern leaf. Pteridoforum 93: 16.
KLOPPER, R.R. 201 Of. The genus Cheilanthes in Namaqualand.
Pteridoforum 94: 1-7.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010g. Now you know!: John Hunter McLea ( 1 836—
1878). Pteridoforum 94: 9, 10.
KLOPPER, R.R. 2010h. Aloe pillansii L. Guthrie, 1926: Giant quiver
tree. Internet 1 pp. Taxonomy in Action 2010: 9.
http://chinabio.netl .tw/jessy/20101015.pdf.
KLOPPER, R.R., BESTER, S.P. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. Range exten-
sion records from the southern Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Prov-
ince, South Africa (Pteridophyta). Bothalia 40: 82, 83.
KLOPPER, R.R. & CROUCH, N.R. 2010a. New distribution records
and noteworthy collections of pteridophytes in KwaZulu-Natal
(Pteridophyta). Bothalia 40: 68-70.
KLOPPER, R.R. & CROUCH, N.R. 2010b. The small rasp fern and the
vegetable fern: non-indigenous pteridophytes as emerging alien
invaders. Pteridoforum 93: 4-7.
KLOPPER, R.R. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2010. Abstract: Pteridophytes
and lycophytes of Sao Tome and Principe, an update. In V.H.
Jeannoda, S.G. Razafimandimbison & P. de Block, Programme
of the 19th AETFAT Congress, Madagascar, 25-30 April 2010.
Scripta Botanica Belgica 46: 241 .
KLOPPER, R.R., HAMER, M., STEENKAMP, Y., SMITH, G.F. &
CROUCH, N.R. 2010. Richest of the rich: South Africa’s biodi-
versity treasure trove. Quest 6,3: 20-23.
KLOPPER, R.R., MATOS, S., FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F.
2010. A preliminary checklist for the aloes of Angola. In X. van
der Burgt, .1. van der Maesen & J.-M. Onana, Systematics and
conservation of African plants. Proceedings of the 18th trien-
nial Congress of the AETFAT. Yaounde. Cameroon: 37-41. Kew
Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
KLOPPER, R.R., RAKOTOARISOA, S.E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010.
Abstract: Aloes of Madagascar: interactive key. In V.H. Jean-
noda, S.G. Razafimandimbison & P. de Block, Programme of the
19th AETFAT Congress, 25-30 April 2010, Madagascar. Scripta
Botanica Belgica 46: 242.
KLOPPER, R.R. & SMITH, G.F. 2010a. Reinstatement of Aloe specta-
bilis (Asphodelaceae-Alooideae). Bothalia 40: 91-93.
KLOPPER, R.R. & SMITH, G.F. 2010b. Aloe neilcrouchii , a new
robust leptaloe from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Asphode-
laceae-Alooideae). Bothalia 40: 93-96.
KLOPPER, R.R. & SMITH, G.F. 2010-11. Aloe (Asphodelaceae).
Internet 7 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/aloe.htm.
KLOPPER, R.R., SMITH, G.F., CROUCH, N.R. & DEMISSEW, S.
2010. Abstract: Aloes of the World Project: background and
progress. In V.H. Jeannoda, S.G. Razafimandimbison & P. de
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
373
Block, Programme of the 19th AETFAT Congress, 25-30 April
2010, Madagascar. Scripta Botanica Belgico 46: 243.
KLOPPER, R.R., SMITH, G.F. & DEMISSEW, S. 2010. The Aloes of
the World Project. In X. van der Burgt, J. van der Maesen &
J.-M. Onana, Systematics and conservation of African plants.
Proceedings of the 18th triennial Congress of the AETFAT,
Yaounde, Cameroon: 781-785. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew.
KLOPPER, R.R., SMITH, G.F.. F1GUEIREDO, E. & CROUCH, N.R.
2010. Notes on Agave palmeri Engelm. (Agavaceae) and its
allies in the Ditepalae. Bradleya 28: 53-66.
KLOPPER, R.R., VAN WYK, A.E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. Phylogenetic
relationships in the family Asphodelaceae ( Asparagales). Biodi-
versity & Ecology 3: 9-36 (= Schumannia 6: 9-36).
KLOPPER, R.R., ZIETSMAN, P.C., DU PREEZ, P.J. & SMITH, G.F.
2010. A first record of a South African aloe. Aloe spectabilis,
becoming naturalised elsewhere in the country. Bradleya 28: 37, 38.
KONDLO, M. 2010-06. Phyllanthus reticulatus Poir. (Euphorbiaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/phyllanthusret.htm.
LALLA. R. 2010a. Furcraea gigantea (Mauritius hemp). Internet 1 pp.
http://www.durban.gov.za/durban/services/development-plan
ning-and-management/epcpd/copy_of_image/Furcraea%20
gigantea%20info%20sheet%202010.pdf.
LALLA, R. 2010b. Special hotline to report beautiful alien invader.
KZN Birds 31: 14.
LE ROUX, J.J., GEERTS, S., IVEY, P, KRAUSS, P„ RICHARDSON,
D.M., SUDA, J. & WILSON, J.R.U. 2010. Molecular system-
atics and ecology of invasive Kangaroo Paws in South Africa:
management implications for a horticulturally important genus.
Biology Invasions 12: 3989-4002.
MAGEE, A.R. 2010-02. Arctopus echinatus L. (Apiaceae). Internet 4
pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/arctopusechinatus.htm.
MAGEE, A.R. 2010-04. Notobubon galbamtm (L.) Magee (Apiaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/notobubongalb.htm.
MAGEE, A.R., CALVINO, C.I., LIU, M„ DOWNIE, S.R., TILNEY,
P.M. & VAN WYK, B.-E. 2010. New tribal delimitations for
the early diverging lineages of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae.
Taxon 59: 567-580.
MAGEE, A.R. & MANNING, J.C. 2010a. Annesorhiza calcicola
(Apiaceae), a new limestone endemic species from the Western
Cape Province of South Africa. South African Journal of Botany
76: 139-141.
MAGEE, A.R. & MANNING. J.C. 2010b. Two new species of Aster-
aceae (tribe Anthemideae, subtribe Pentziinae) from the Cape
Floristic Region of South Africa. South Afiican Journal of Bot-
any 76: 279-284.
MAGEE, A.R., VAN WYK. B.-E„ TILNEY, P.M. & DOWNIE, S.R.
2010a. Systematics of African and Malagasy Pimpinella and
related genera (Apiaceae, Pimpinelleae). Plant Systematics and
Evolution 288: 201-211.
MAGEE, A.R., VAN WYK, B.-E., TILNEY, P.M. & DOWNIE, S.R.
2010b. A taxonomic revision of the South African endemic
genus Dasispermum (Apiaceae, Apioideae). South African Jour-
nal of Botany 76: 308-323.
MAHARAJ. R.. MAHARAJ, V., NEWMARCH, M„ CROUCH. N.R..
BHAGWANDIN, N„ FOLB. P.I.. PILLAY. P. & GAYARAM.
R. 2010. Evaluation of selected South African ethnomedicinal
plants as mosquito repellents against the Anopheles arabiensis
mosquito in a rodent model. Malaria Journal 9: 301 .
http://www.malariajoumal.eom/eontent/9/l/301. Digital object
identifier (DOI ): 1 0. 1 1 86/1475-2875-9-30 1 .
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2010a. New synonyms and a new
name in South African Asteraceae: Senecioneae from the south-
ern African winter rainfall region. Bothalia 40: 37-M6.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2010b. Two new species of
Limoselleae from western South Africa: Trieenia occulta and
Zaluzianskya regalis (Scrophulariaceae). Bothalia 40: 84—90.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2010c. Senecio comptonii and
S. esterhuyseniae, two new species of Senecio sens. lat. (Sene-
cioneae) from the Cape Floristic Region (Asteraceae). Bothalia
40: 193-197.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2010d. Bulbinella calcicola , a
new species from Saldanha Bay, Western Cape (Asphodelaceae).
Bothalia A0: 197-199.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2010. Botany and horticulture
of the genus Freesia (Iridaceae). Strelitzia 27. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MANNING, J.C., KARIS, P.O., GOLDBLATT, P. & HELME, N.A.
2010. Berkheya chrysanthemoides and Heterorachis hystrix , two
new species of Arctotideae-Gorteriinae from the southwestern
Cape (Asteraceae). Bothalia 40: 185-190.
MANTLANA, B. & JACOBS, S. 2010. The carbon cycle — ecology of
the underground. Quest 6,2: 32, 33.
MAPHANGA, Z. & NOTTEN, A. 2010-03. Brunia noduliflora Gold-
blatt & J.C. Manning (= Brunia nodiflora sensu auct., non L.)
(Bruniaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/bmnianoduliflora.htm.
MAPHANGWA, K.W. 2010. Lichen thermal sensitivities, moisture
interception and elemental accumulation in an arid South Afri-
can ecosystem. M.Sc. (Biodiversity and Conservation Biology)
thesis. University of the Western Cape.
MCLEISH, M.J., VAN NOORT, S. & TOLLEY, K.A. 2010. Parasitoid
fig-wasp evolutionary diversification and variation in ecological
opportunity. Molecular Ecology 19: 1483-1496.
MCQUILLAN, M. 2010-03. Ursinia abrotanifolia (R.Br.) Spreng.
(Asteraceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planttuv/ursiniaabrot.htm.
MCQUILLAN, M. 2010-04. Cotula sericea L.f. (Asteraceae). Internet
3 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/cotulasericea.htm.
MCQUILLAN, M. 2010-07. Diascia patens (Thunb.) Grant ex Fourc.
(Scrophulariaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/diasciapatens.htm.
M1DGLEY, G.F., BOND, W.J., KAPOS, V., RAVILIOUS, C., SCHAR-
LEMANN, J.P.W. & WOODWARD, F. 2010. Terrestrial car-
bon stocks and biodiversity: key knowledge gaps and some
policy implications. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustain-
ability 2: 264—270. Digital object identifier (DOI): 10.1016/j.
cosust.20 10.06.001.
MIDGLEY.G.F., DAVIES, I.D., ALBERT. C.H., ALTWEGG, R.. HAN-
NAH, L„ HUGHES, G.O., O'HALLORAN, L.R., SCANG-
WAN, C„ THORNE, J.H. & THUILLER, W. 2010. BioMove: an
integrated platform simulating the dynamic response of species
to environmental change. Ecography 33: 612-616.
MOORE, G., SMITH, G.F., FIGUEIREDO, E„ DEMISSEW, S.,
LEWIS, G„ SCHRIRE, B„ RICO, L. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2010.
Acacia , the 2011 Nomenclature Section in Melbourne, and
beyond. Taxon 59: 1188-1195.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD. M.C. (eds). 2010. CD Set: The veg-
etation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19.
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MULHOLLAND, D.A., LANGAT, M.K., CROUCH, N.R., COLEY,
H.M., MUTAMBI, E.M. & NUZ1LLARD, J.-M. 2010. Cem-
branolides from the stem bark of the southern African medicinal
plant Croton gratissimus (Euphorbiaceae). Phytochemistry 71:
1381-1386.
MUSAWENKOSI, N. & NOTTEN, A. 2010-03. Rqfnia triflora Thunb.
(Fabaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/rafniatriflora.htm.
MUSIL, C„ NYAGA, J., MAPHANGWA, K. & RAITT, L. 2010.
Responses of dwarf succulent plants, lichens, and soils to exper-
imental climate warming in an arid South African ecosystem.
In U. Schmiedel & N. Jurgens, Biodiversity in southern Africa,
vol. 2: patterns and processes at regional scale: 246—250. Klaus
Hess Publishers, Gottingen & Windhoek.
NDEBELE-MURISA, M.R., MUSIL, C.F. & RAITT, L. 2010. A review
of phytoplankton dynamics in tropical African lakes. South Afri-
can Journal of Science 106: 13—18.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-01. Gomphocarpus physocarpus E.Mey. = Ascle-
pias physocarpa (E.Mey.) Schltr. (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoi-
deae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/gomphophysocarp.htm.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-02a. Crassula rubricaulis Eckl. & Zeyh. (Crassu-
laceae ). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/crassularubri.htm.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-02b. Euclea natalensis A. DC. (Ebenaceae). Internet
3 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/eucleanatal.htm.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-06. Paranomus reflexits (E. Phillips & Hutch.)
Fourc. (Proteaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/paranomref.htm.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-08. Serruria glomerata (L.) R.Br. (Proteaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.pIantzafrica.com/plantqrs/serruriaglom.htm.
NOTTEN, A. 2010-10. Leucadendron linifolium (Jacq.) R.Br. (Pro-
teaceae). Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/leucalinifolium.htm.
374
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
NURRISH, L. 2010-04. Elegia nuda (Rottb.) Kunth. (Restionaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/elegianuda.htm.
NURRISH, L. 2010-08. Serruria rosea E. Phillips (Proteaceae). Internet
3 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/serruriaros.htm.
NURRISH. L. 2010-09. Leucospermum grandiflorum (Salisb.) R.Br.
(Proteaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantkIm/leucograndi.htm.
NURRISH, L. 2010-10. Leucadendron rubrum Burm.f. (Proteaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzaffica.com/plantklm/leucadenrubrum.htm.
O’FARRELL, P.J., DONALDSON, J.S. & HOFFMAN, T. 2010. Veg-
etation transformation, functional compensation, and soil health
in a semi-arid environment. Arid Land Research and Manage-
ment 24: 12-30.
OLIVER, R. 2010-07. Chascanum cernuum (L.) E.Mey. (Verbenaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantcd/chascemuum.htm.
PENTERIANI, V., PETTORELLI, N„ GORDON, I.J., KATZNER, T„
MOCK, K„ REDPATH, S„ ALTWEGG, R. & GOMPPER, M.E.
2010. New European Union fisheries regulations could benefit
conservation of marine animals. Animal Conservation 13: 1,2.
PETERSEN, C. & HOLNESS, S. 2010. Case study: South Africa:
ecosystem-based planning for climate change. World Resources
Report, Washington DC.
http://www.worldresourcesreport.org/files/wrr/wrr_case_study_
south_africa_ecosystem_based_planning.pdf.
RAES, N„ DONALDSON, J„ WOLFSON, M„ DE GROOT, W„
RIBEIRO, S, SMITH, G.F., ROOS, M„ STEENKAMP, Y„
RAMPHO, T. & MIDGLEY, G. 2010. EDIT, the South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute and NCB Naturalis make
progress with developing collaborative projects. EDIT Newslet-
ter 23:7,8.
RAHLAO, S.J., ESLER, K.J., MILTON, S.J. & BARNARD, P. 2010.
Nutrient addition and moisture promote the invasiveness of
crimson fountain grass ( Pennisetum setaceum). Weed Science
58: 154-159.
RAHLAO, S.J., MILTON, S.J., ESLER, K.J. & BARNARD, P. 2010.
The distribution of invasive Pennisetum setaceum along road-
sides in western South Africa: the role of corridor interchanges.
Weed Research: 50: 537-543.
RAIMONDO, D. & VON STADEN, L. 2009. Patterns and trends in
the Red List of South African plants. In D. Raimondo, L. von
Staden, W. Foden, J.E. Victor, N.A. Helme, R.C. Turner, D.A.
Kamundi & P.A. Manyama, Red List of South African plants
2009. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Insti-
tute, Pretoria.
RAIMONDO, D„ VON STADEN, L„ FODEN, W„ VICTOR, J.E.,
HELME, N.A., TURNER, R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MAN-
YAMA, P.A. (eds). 2009. Red List of South African plants 2009.
Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pre-
toria.
RAO, B.R.P., SURESH BABU, M.V. & DONALDSON, J.S. 2010. A
reassessment of the conservation status of Cycas beddomei Dyer
(Cycadaceae), an endemic of the Tirupati-kadapa hills, Andhra
Pradesh, India; and comments on its CITES status. Encephalar-
tos 102: 19-24.
RETIEF, E. & CROUCH, N.R. 2010. The status of Cyphostemma
unguiformifohum in southern Africa (Vitaceae). Bothalia 40:
167-169. '
ROULIN, A.R., ALTWEGG, R„ JENSEN, H.M., STEINLAND, I. &
SCHAUB, M. 2010. Sex-dependant selection on an autosomal
melanic female ornament promotes the evolution of sex ratio
bias. Ecology Letters 13: 616-626.
ROUX, J.P. 2010. The fem genus Elaphoglossum section Lepidoglossa
(Dryopteridaceae) in Africa, Macaronesia, the mid-Atlantic, and
southern Indian Ocean Islands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 165: 20-63.
RUST, C. 2010-02. Moraea ciliata (L.f.) Ker Gawl. (Iridaceae) Internet
2 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantklm/moraeaciliata.htm.
RUST, C. 2010-03. Babiana praemorsa Goldbiatt & J.C. Manning. (Iri-
daceae). Internet 2 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/babianapraem.htm.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & POWRIE, L.W. 2010. Severely degraded
dunes of the southern Kalahari: local extinction, persistence, and
natural re-establishment of plants. African Journal of Ecology
48: 930-938.
RUWANZA, S., MUSIL, C. & ESLER, K. 2010. The effectiveness of
sucrose applications as a restoration aid in transformed lowland
fynbos ecosystems. In U. Schmiedel & N. Jurgens, Biodiversity
in southern Africa, vol. 2: patterns and processes at regional
scale: 260-264. Klaus Hess Publishers, Gottingen & Windhoek.
RYMER, P.D., MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P„ POWELL, M.
& SAVOLAINEN, V. 2010. Evidence of recent and continu-
ous speciation in a biodiversity hotspot: a population genetic
approach in southern African gladioli ( Gladiolus ; Iridaceae).
Molecular Ecology 19: 4765^1782.
SAMAAI, T„ GIBBONS, M.J., KERWATH, S„ YEMANE, D. &
SINK, K. 2010. Sponge richness along a bathymetric gradient
within the iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa. Marine
Biodiversity’ AW. 205-217.
SEYMOUR, C.L. & DEAN, W.R.J. 2010. The influence of changes in
habitat structure on the species composition of bird assemblages
in the southern Kalahari. Austral Ecology 35: 581-592.
SEYMOUR, C.L., MILTON, S.J., JOSEPH, G.S., DEAN, W.R.J.,
DITLHOBOLO, T. & CUMMING, G.S. 2010. Twenty years of
rest returns grazing potential, but not palatable plant diversity,
to Karoo rangeland. South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology
47: 859-867."
SEYMOUR, C.L. & VELDTMAN, R. 2010. Ecological role of control
agent, and not just host-specificity, determine risks of biological
control. Austral Ecology’ 35: 704-71 1 .
SHAW, J.D., WILSON, J.R.U. & RICHARDSON, D.M. 2010. Initiat-
ing dialogue between scientists and managers of biological inva-
sions. Biological Invasions 12: 4077^1083.
SIMMONS, R.E. & ALTWEGG, R. 2010. Necks-for-sex or competing
browser? A critique of ideas on the evolution of giraffe. Journal
of Zoology 282: 6-12.
SINK, K.J., ATKINSON, L.J., KERWATH, S. & SAMAAI, T. 2010.
Assessment of offshore benthic biodiversity’ on the Agulhas Bank
and the potential role of petroleum infrastructure in offshore
spatial management. Technical Report, South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town.
SINK, K.J., LOMBARD, M„ GRANTHAM, H„ ATTWOOD, C.,
LESLIE, R„ SAMAAI, T„ KERWARTH, S„ FAIRWEATH-
ER, T„ VAN DER LINGEN, C., ATKINSON, A„ WOLF, T. &
MAJIEDT, P. 2010. Systematic biodiversity planning to identify
a potential offshore Marine Protected Area network for South
Africa. Technical Report, South African National Biodiversity
Institute, Cape Town.
SITHOLE, H.J.N. 2010a. Will American alien ruin South Africa’s
aquatic habitats? Environmental Management Magazine 5,4: 4,
5.
SITHOLE, H.J.N. 2010b. Woodcarving trade in Port St John area:
dynamics, opportunities and constraints. M.Sc. thesis, Walter
Sisulu University, East London.
SMITH, G.F. 2010a. Obituary: Santiago Castroviejo (1946-2009).
Bothalia AO: 145, 146.
SMITH, G.F. 2010b. Abstract: Linnaeus +303. Systematics in southern
Africa in 2010. New Frontiers in Plant Systematics and Evolu-
tion: 39. State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary
Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei-
jing, China.
SMITH, G.F. 2010c. Abstract: If conservation is a responsibility for
all, why are taxonomists going extinct? Or are they? Perspec-
tives from South Africa. International Symposium on Botanical
diversity: exploration, understanding and use. National Botanic
Garden of Belgium, Meise & Royal Academy of Overseas Sci-
ences, Meise, Belgium, 16-18 September 2010. Scripta Botani-
ca Belgica 48: 87.
SMITH, G.F. & CROUCH, N.R. 2010. Aloe nicltolsii Gideon F.Sm.
& N.R. Crouch (Asphodelaceae): a new leptaloe from KwaZulu-
Natal, South Africa. Bradleya 28: 103-106.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2010a. Sedwn album: a mainstay
of European succulents. Cactus & Succulent Journal (U.S.) 82:
41,42.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2010b. Purslane (Portulaca olera-
cea , Porlulacaceae) in southern Africa: more useful than most
succulents. Cactus <& Succulent Journal (US) 82: 1 16-121.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2010c. Petrosedum sediforme, a
beautiful species of Crassulaceae from Portugal. Cactus World
28: 103-106.
SMITH, G.F., FIGUEIREDO, E. & MOORE, G. 2010. Who amends
the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature? Taxon 59:
930-934.
SMITH, M.J., BENITEZ DIAZ, H„ CLEMENTE-MUNOZ, M.A.,
DONALDSON, J.S., HUTTON, .1., MCGOUGH, N.H.,
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
375
MEDELLIN, R.A., MORGAN, D.H.W., O’CRIODAIN, C„
OLDFIELD, T.E.E., SCHIPPMANN, U. & WILLIAMS, R.J.
2010. The role of biological information in CITES non-detri-
mental findings: current practices and scientific research oppor-
tunities. Biological Conservation 144: 82-91.
SMITHIES, S.J. & BURGOYNE, P.M. 2010. Cytinus visseri, Cytinace-
ae. Curtis ’s Botanical Magazine 26: 322—332.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & MANNING, J.C. 2010. Colchicum albofenestra-
tum, a new species from Namaqualand, South Africa. Bothalia
40: 175-177.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & MEEROW, A.W. 2010. Floral and macroecological
evolution within Cyrtanthus (Amaryllidaceae): inferences from
combined analyses of plastid ndhF and nrDNA ITS sequences.
South African Journal of Botany 76: 2 1 7-238.
SOLOMONS, G. & NOTTEN, A. 2010-03. Asparagus scandens
Thunb. (Asparagaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/asparagusscan.htm.
SPEAR. D., LE ROUX, J„ WILSON, J. & GAERTNER. M. 2010.
South Africa invaded. Quest 6,2: 12, 13.
STEENKAMP. Y„ SMITH, G.F., GROBLER, A., MOTHOGOANE,
M.S., HAMER, M„ KLOPPER, R.R., HOLSCHER, B„ KOE-
KEMOER, M„ RAMPHO, E.T., SINGH, Y. & CROUCH, N.R.
2010. Collecting and recording life! The role of natural science
collections in biodiversity research and conservation. Quest 6,2:
3-6.
STEYN, H.M. 2010a. Moraea tanquana Goldblatt & J.C. Manning:
new species from an arid area. Internet 1 pp. Taxonomy in Action
2010 : 7. http://chinabio.netl.tw/jessy/20101015.pdf.
STEYN, H.M. 2010b. Anticharis juncea L. Bolus.: 100 years later. Inter-
net 1 pp. Taxonomy in Action 2010: 10.
http ://chinabio.net 1 .tw/j essy/20 1 0 1 0 1 5 .pdf.
STEYN, H.M. 2010-08. Gardenia volkensii (Rubiaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/gardeniavolk.htm.
STOLL, N. 2010-08. Euclea crispa (Thunb.) Giirke subsp. crispa
(Ebenaceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/eucleacrispacrispa.htm.
SUINYUY, T.N. & DONALDSON, J.S. 2010. Insect pollination in the
African cycad Encephalartos friderici-guilielmi Lehm. South
African Journal of Botany 75: 682-688.
SUINYUY, T„ DONALDSON. J.S. & JOHNSON, S.D. 2010. Scent
chemistry and patterns of thermogenesis in male and female
cones of the African cycad Encephalartos natalensis (Zamiace-
ae). South African Journal of Botany 76: 717-725.
TOLLEY, K.A. 2010. Can lizards beat the heat, or will they go extinct?
South African Journal of Science 106: 5, 6.
TOLLEY, K.A., BRAEE, A. & CUNNINGHAM, M. 2010. Phyloge-
ography of the clicking stream frog Strongylopus grayii (Anura,
Pyxicephalidae) reveals cryptic divergence across climatic zones
in an abundant and widespread taxon. African Journal of Herpe-
tology 59: 17-32.
TOLLEY, K.A., DE VILLIERS, A., CHERRY, M.l. & MEASEY, G.J.
2010. Isolation and high genetic diversity in dwarf mountain
toads ( Capenisbufo ) from South Africa. Biological Journal of
the Linnean Society 100: 822-834.
TOLLEY, K.A., RAW, R.N.V., ALTWEGG, R. & MEASEY. G.J. 2010.
Chameleons on the move: survival and migration of the Cape
dwarf chameleon, Bradypodion pumilum, within a fragmented
semi-urban habitat. African Zoology 45: 99-106.
TOWNSEND, T.M., TOLLEY, K.A., GLAW, F., BOHME, W. &
VENCES, M. 2010. Eastward from Africa: paleocurrent-medi-
ated chameleon dispersal to the Seychelles Island. Digital object
identifier ( DOI): 1 0. 1 098/rsbl.20 1 0.070 1 .
TYAMBETU, O. 20 1 0-0 1 . Trichodiadema pygmaeum L. Bolus (Mesem-
bryanthemaceae). Internet 2 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planttuv/trichopygmaeum.htm.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 2010-03. Gasteria vlokii Van Jaarsv. (Aloaceae
or Asphodelaceae: Alooideae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/gasteriavlokii.htm.
VAN JAARSVELD. E. 2010-05. Senecio bryoniifolius Harv. (Aster-
aceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/seneciobryon.htm.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 2010-12. Huernia pendula E. A. Bruce (Apocy-
naceae). Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/planthij/huemiapend.htm.
VAN ROOY, J. & VAN WYK, A.E. 2010. The bryofloristic regions of
southern Africa. Journal of Bryology 32: 80-91 .
VAN WILGEN, N.J., WILSON, J.RAJ., ELITH, J.. WINTLE, B.A. &
RICHARDSON, D.M. 2010. Alien invaders and reptile traders:
what drives the live animal trade in South Africa? Animal Con-
servation 13: 24—32.
VAN WYK., B.-E., TILNEY, P.M. & MAGEE, A.R. 201 0. A revision of
the genus Glia (Apiaceae, tribe Heteromorpheae). South African
Journal of Botany 76: 259-27 1 .
VAN WYK, B.-E., VENTER, M. & BOATWRIGHT, J.S. 201 0. A revi-
sion of the genus Bolusia (Fabaceae, Crotalarieae). South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 76: 86—94.
VELDTMAN, R„ CHOWN, S.L. & MCGEOGH, M.A. 2010. Using
scale-area curves to quantify the distribution, abundance and
range expansion of invasive species. Diversity and Distributions
16: 159-169.
V1LJOEN, C. 2010-01. Pavetta cooperi Harv. & Sond. (Rubiaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantnop/pavettacoop.htm.
V1LJOEN, C. 2010-07. Hibiscus pedunculatus L.f. (Malvaceae). Inter-
net 3 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/planthij/hibiscuspen.htm.
VILJOEN, C. 2010-12. Streptocarpus saxorum Engl. (Gesneriaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/strepsaxomm.htm.
VOIGT, W. 2010-09. Aloe khamiesensis Pillans. (Asphodelaceae).
Internet 4 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/aloekhamie.htm.
VOIGT, W. 2010-11 . Erythrophysa alata Eckl. & Zeyh. (Sapindaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantefg/erythalata.htm.
VON STADEN. L„ RAIMONDO, D. & FODEN, W. 2009a. Approach
to Red List assessments. In D. Raimondo, L. von Staden, W.
Foden, J.E. Victor, N.A. Helme, R.C. Turner, D.A. Kamundi &
RA. Manyama, Red List of South African plants 2009. Strelitzia
25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
VON STADEN, L., RAIMONDO, D. & FODEN, W. 2009b. Introduc-
tion. In D. Raimondo, L. von Staden, W. Foden, J.E. Victor,
N.A. Helme, R.C. Turner. D.A. Kamundi & P.A. Manyama, Red
List of South African plants 2009. Strelitzia 25. South African
National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
WALTERS. M„ CROUCH, N.R., KLOPPER, R.R. & SMITH, G.F.
2010. Succulents of southern Africa: vetplante in the digital age.
Aloe 47: 52, 53.
WALTERS. M„ SMITH, G.F. & CROUCH, N.R. 2010. The African
Plants Initiative (API) in South Africa. Taxon 59: 1943-1946.
WANG, Y.Z.. WILSON, J.R.U., ZHANG, J., ZHANG, J. & DING, J.
2010. Potential impact and non-target effects of Gallerucida
bifasciata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a candidate biologi-
cal control agent for Fallopia japonica. Biological Control 53:
319-324.
WARREN, R„ PRICE, J., FISCHLIN, A., SANTOS, S.D.L.N. &
MIDGLEY, G. 2010. Increasing impacts of climate change upon
ecosystems with increasing global mean temperature rise. Cli-
matic Change : 1-37. Digital object identifier (DOI): 10.1007/
si 0584-0 10-9923-5.
WILKIN, P„ BURROWS, J., BURROWS, S„ MUASYA, A.M. & VAN
WYK, E. 2010. A critically endangered new species of yam
(Dioscorea strydomiana Wilkin, Dioscoreaceae) from Mpuma-
langa, South Africa. Kew Bulletin 65: 42 1 — 433.
WILLIS, C.K. 2010. SABCA — perspectives from a citizen scientist.
Metamorphosis 21: 128-135.
WILLIS, C.K., MARINUS, E. & RUST, C. 2010. The Hantam National
Botanical Garden. Veld & Flora 96: 84—87.
WILLIS, C.K. & NENE, G.A. 2010. KwaZulu-Natal National Botani-
cal Garden: serving communities for more than a century. Veld
& Flora 96: 166—169.
WILLIS, C.K. & WOODHALL, S.E. Compilers. 2010. Butterflies of
South Africa’s National Botanical Gardens. SANBI Biodiversity
Series 16. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretor-
ia.
XABA. P. 2010-06. Begonia dregei Otto & A.Dietr. (Begoniaceae).
Internet 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/begoniadreg.htm.
XABA, P. 2010-09. Begonia geranioides Hook.f. (Begoniaceae). Inter-
net 3 pp.
http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/begoniageran.htm.
XABA, P. 2010-11. Strelitzia alba (L.f.) Skeels (Strelitziaceae). Internet
3 pp. http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantqrs/strelitziaalba.htm.
YEMBATUROVA, E.Y.U., VAN WYK, B.-E., TILNEY, P.M. & WIN-
TER, P.J.D. 2010. The taxonomic significance of fruit morphol-
ogy and anatomy in the genus Alepidea Delaroche (Apiaceae,
subfamily Saniculoideae). Plant Diversity and Evolution
376
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
128: 369-385. Digital object identifier (DOl): 10.11 27/1 869-
6155/2010/0128-0017.
Z1ETSMAN, P.C. & SMITH. G.F. 2010. Occurrence of Haworthia
bolusii var. blackbeardiana in the Free State, South Africa
(Asphodelaceae). Bothalia 40: 58.
ZONNEVELD, B.J.M. & DUNCAN, G.D. 2010. Genome sizes of
Eucomis L'Her. (Hyacinthaceae) and a description of the new
species Eucomis grimshawii G.D. Duncan & Zonneveld. Plant
Systematics and Evolution 284,1 & 2: 99-109. Digital object
identifier (DOI): 1 0. 1 007/s00606-009-0236-y.
Bothalia 41,2: 377-387 (2011)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear
in bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union
of South Africa. This house journal of the South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria,
is devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The
main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and
cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to con-
tents, authors and subjects are published annually.
1 EDITORIAL POLICY
1.1 Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with
flora and vegetation of southern Africa and related sub-
jects. Full-length papers and short notes, as well as
book reviews and obituaries of botanists, are accepted.
The editor should be notified that an article is part of a
series of manuscripts; please submit a list of the parts of
a series; all parts should preferably be published in one
journal.
1.2 Submission of a manuscript to Bothalia implies
that it has not been published previously and is not being
considered for publication elsewhere.
1.3 Authors whose first language is not English are
requested to have their MS edited by an English speaker
before submission.
1 .4 Articles are assessed by referees, both local and
overseas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible ref-
erees to judge their work. Authors are responsible for the
factual correctness of their contributions. Bothalia main-
tains an editorial board (see title page) to ensure that
international standards are upheld.
1.5 Page charges: as stated in our notification
included in volume 23,1 (May 1993), MSS submit-
ted for publication in Bothalia are subject to payment
of page charges of R 125,00 per printed page, VAT
included. The following are exempt from these charges:
1, SANBI members; 2, persons/institutions who have
been granted exemption by the Executive Committee
of the SANBI; 3, authors of contributions requested by
the Editor; 4, contributors to the column "FSA contribu-
tions’. The Editor’s decision on the number of pages is
final. An invoice will be sent to the author, who must
arrange for payment as soon as possible to SANBI, Pub-
lications Section, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
1.6 Deadline dates for submission of MS: for possi-
ble inclusion of the MS for the May issue — May of the
previous year, and for the October issue — October of the
previous year.
2 REQUIREMENTS FOR A MANUSCRIPT
2.1 The original manuscript should be typed on one
side of A4-size paper, double line spacing throughout
(including abstract, tables, captions of figures, litera-
ture references), and have a margin of at least 30 mm
all round. Tables should be typed in single line spac-
ing on a separate page at the end of the article. Three
photocopies (all pages photocopied on both sides of the
paper, including figures, to reduce weight for postage)
of all items, including text, line drawings, tables and
lists should be submitted, and the author should retain
a complete set of copies. High quality photocopies of
each figure should be submitted for review purposes.
The electronic version of the text should be submitted
with the manuscript.
2.2 Papers should conform to the general style and
layout of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 26
onwards).
2.3 Material should be presented in the following
sequence: title page with title, name(s) of author(s),
address(es) of author(s) and mention of granting agen-
cies, keywords and abstract.
2.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and
aims. Contents (see 8), Material and methods. Results,
Interpretation (Discussion), Specimens examined (in
revisions and monographs), Acknowledgements, Refer-
ences, Index of names (recommended for revisions deal-
ing with more than about 15 species), Tables, Captions
of figures and figures. In the case of short notes, obitu-
aries and book reviews, keywords and an abstract are
omitted.
2.5 All pages must be numbered i.e. typed consecu-
tively on the top right-hand corner of the page, begin-
ning with the title page to those with references, tables,
captions of figures and figures.
2.6 Special characters: use your own word or code
that is unique and self-explanatory, enclosed between
ANGLE BRACKETS, e.g. <mu>m for pm. Please sup-
ply us with a list of the codes.
2.7 Use a non-breaking space (in MS Word — Ctrl,
shift, space) to keep two elements together on the same
line, e.g. 3 500.
2.8 DO NOT JUSTIFY LINES.
2.9 Do not break words, except hyphenated words.
2.10 A hyphen is designated as one dash, with no
space between the letter and the dash, e.g. ovate-lanceo-
late. See also 17.7.
2.11 An N-dash is typed in MS Word code (alt +
0150) or as three hyphens with no space between the
letter and the hyphen, e.g. 2 5 mm (typeset, it looks
like this, 2-5 mm). See also 17.7.
2.12 An M-dash is typed in MS Word code (alt +
0151 ) or as two hyphens with no space between the let-
ter and the hyphen, e.g. computers- -what a blessing!
(typeset, it looks like this: computers — what). See also
17.7.
2.13 Do not use a double space anywhere between
words, after commas, full stops, colons, semicolons or
exclamation marks.
378
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
2.14 Use lower case x as times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
2.15 Use single (not double) opening and closing
quotes, e.g. the so-called "stiffy ’ refers to a rigid diskette.
In MSWord the codes are alt + 0145 and alt + 0146.
2.16 Keys — put only three leader dots before number
of taxon (with one space before and after each dot),
regardless of how far or near the word is from the right
margin, e.g. ... 1 . R. ovata (see 13.18).
3 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC FILES
3.1 USE NORMAL STYLE ONLY.
3.2 Provide electronic files on CD or send via the
e-mail to momberg@sanbi.org or germishuizen@
sanbi.org. Three hard copies of the MS should also be
POSTED to the editor.
3.3 Data should be in MSWord. An RTL file is pref-
erable because it retains the formatting.
3.4 All lines, headings, keys, etc., should start flush
at the margin, therefore NO INDENTATIONS, FOOT-
NOTES, TABS OR STYLES of any kind.
3.5 In MS Word, italics and bold should be used
where necessary.
3.6 Paragraphs and headings are delineated by a car-
riage return (ENTER) but no indentation.
3.7 Graphics i.e. drawings, graphs or photographs:
submit in a separate file, do not include it in the text.
3.8 Image files with a bigger file size than 2MB can-
not be e-mailed as the SANBI has a 2MB limitation on
the network’s firewall at Head Office. Files smaller than
2MB should be emailed to: b.momberg@sanbi.org.za.
Image files bigger than 2 MB should be provided on a
CD or can be copied to the SANBI FTP site by using the
following link: ftp://ftp.sanbi.org/incoming/. Permission
needs to be obtained to copy material to the FTP site.
Please contact the editor for details.
3.9 Provide an image file originated in Corel Draw
(version 14 or lower), as a CDR file, with fonts con-
verted to curves. Submit image files originated in other
drawing programmes as encapsulated postscript files
(EPS). The conversion to TIF or other file extensions
will be accommodated by SANBI Graphics (see 12.2—
12.4).
3.10 If extensive changes to image files are proposed
by the editor, the author will be contacted and the spe-
cific image file will have to be re-submitted after the
indicated corrections have been implemented.
3.11 Do NOT include tracked changes when sub-
mitting a MS on a CD or electronically.
4 AUTHOR(S)
When there are several authors, the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address,
telephone number and email address should be men-
tioned if they differ from those given on the letterhead.
5 TITLE
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects, the family of the taxon under discus-
sion (see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but
author citations should be omitted from plant names (see
also 13.6).
6 KEYWORDS
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be pro-
vided in English in alphabetical sequence. The follow-
ing points should be borne in mind when selecting key-
words:
6.1 Keywords should be unambiguous, internatio-
nally acceptable words and not recently coined little-
known words.
6.2 They should be in a noun form and verbs should
be avoided.
6.3 They should not consist of an adjective alone;
adjectives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 They should not contain prepositions.
6.5 The singular form should be used for processes
and properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 The plural form should be used for physical
objects, e.g. augers.
6.7 Location (province and/or country); taxa (species,
genus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld
type, biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 Keywords should be selected hierarchically
where possible, e.g. both family and species should be
included.
6.9 They should include terms used in the title.
6. 1 0 They should answer the following questions:
6.10.1 What is the active concept in the document (acti-
vity, operation or process).
6.10.2 What is the passive concept or object of the
active process (item on which the activity, operation or
process takes place).
6.10.3 What is the means of accomplishment or how is
the active concept achieved (technique, method, appara-
tus, operation or process).
6. 10.4 What is the environment in which the active con-
cept takes place (medium, location).
6. 10.5 What are the independent (controlled) and depen-
dent variables?
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
379
6.11 Questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also
be answered in the title.
7 ABSTRACT
7.1 An abstract of no more than 200 words should be
provided. Abstracts are of great importance and should
convey the essence of the article.
7.2 It should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. It should not contain information not appearing
in the article.
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects all taxa from the rank of genus down-
wards should be accompanied by their author citations
(see also 13.6).
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations should
not be italicized but put in bold. If the article deals with
too many taxa, only the important ones should be men-
tioned.
8 TABLE OF CONTENTS
A table of contents should be given for all articles longer
than about 60 typed pages, unless they follow the strict
format of a taxonomic revision.
9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please
give all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
10 LITERATURE REFERENCES
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of lit-
erature references in taxonomic papers see 14.
10.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper, use the name of the first author followed by et al.
10.3 When referring to more than one literature refer-
ence, they should be arranged chronologically and sepa-
rated by a semicolon, e.g. (Nixon 1940; Davis 1976;
Anon. 1981, 1984).
10.4 Titles of books and names of journals should
preferably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good
reason for doing so, they should be treated as described
in 10.12 and 10.13.
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the
text, not in the list of references. Please add the person’s
full initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C.
Boucher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
10.6 References of the same author are arranged in
chronological sequence.
10.7 Where two or more references by the same author
are listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated
with every reference, except in an obituary, where the
name of the deceased in the list of publications (not in
the references) is replaced by an N-dash.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct names
in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no personal
communications, are listed at the end of the manuscript
under the heading References.
10.9 The references are arranged alphabetically
according to authors and chronologically under each
author, with a, b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author
has published more than one work in a year. This
sequence is retained when used in the text, irrespective
of the chronology.
10.10 If an author has published both on his own and
as a senior author with others, the solo publications are
listed first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence,
those published with one or more other authors.
10. 1 1 Author names are typed in capital letters.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out
in full and are italicized as follows: Transactions of the
Linnean Society of London 5: 171-217, or Biology and
ecology’ of weeds : 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature , edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of
journals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific
periodicals.
10.14 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1994. Combining skills: participatory
approaches in biodiversity conservation. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical
diversity in southern Africa. Strelitzia 1: 149-167. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa , edn 3: 10-50. S.M.
Haughton (ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa: 69. Gawthorn,
London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its
ecology. Bothalia 18: 279-287.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Afi-ica No. 5 1 : 45-70.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr. 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35^44.
380
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1)
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR. H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of Rooib-
erg State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL, J.C. 1982. The age of the the Kniseb river silt terrace at
Homeb. Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER. P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K.. in prep. Dune
advancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession chro-
nology at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis. University of Stel-
lenbosch.
MUNDAY, J. 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. ( Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae ) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of the Witwa-
tersrand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, techni-
cal note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M.G. & CARROL, D.M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division,
Directorate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Insti-
tute. In A.E.F. Heydorn. Proceedings of workshop research in Cape
estuaries: 105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology, CSIR.
Stellenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of
the committee on the protection of building limbers in South Africa
against termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, edn 2. CSIR Research
Report No. 169.
1 1 TABLES (also electronic submissions)
11.1 Each table should be presented on a separate
sheet and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first
table mentioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1’.
1 1 .2 In the captions of tables the word ‘TABLE’ is
written in capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia
for the format required.
11.3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can
often be reduced in width by interchanging primary hor-
izontal and vertical heads.
12 FIGURES (original or electronic submissions)
12.1 Line drawings (original artwork) should be in
jet-black Indian ink, on fine art paper, 200 gsm. Lines
should be clear enough to accommodate reduction. Do
not use draughtman’s film as it causes problems with the
scanning process.
12.2 Drawings in pencil will not be accepted.
12.3 Provide original drawings electronically as bit-
map TIP files, 600 dpi or higher. Provide photographs
electronically as either TIF or JPG files, 600 dpi or
higher. At the request of the Author, the Publications
Section of SANBI will assist with the scanning of
original material. Figures should be planned to fit, after
reduction, into a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with
a maximum vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space
for the caption in the case of figures that will occupy a
whole page.
12.4 Graphs and histograms should be submitted
as stipulated in 3.9, or as TIF or JPG files at a resolu-
tion of 600 dpi or higher if generated in other pro-
grammes. Graphs and histograms generated in EXCEL
or MSWord, should be provided as is. File conversion
into the correct format will be accommodated by SANBI
Graphics. Please do not supply embedded graphics in
the documents or files that are optimized for screen use.
Do not submit graphs and histograms in colour. If shad-
ing is used it should be easily discernible.
12.5 Photographs should be of excellent quality on
glossy paper with clear detail and moderate contrast so
that the figures can be scanned without retouching them
electronically. If submitted electronically, provide as a
TIF or JPG file at 600 dpi or higher and not as a DOC,
PDF, EXCEL or POWERPOINT file.
12.6 Photograph mosaics should be submitted as
SEPARATE photographs or TIF/JPG files at 600 dpi
or higher, as well as a photocopy/layout of the mosaic.
Final layout of the mosaic will be done by our graphics
department.
12.7 Do not number the original images but include a
scale bar. Indicate the lettering on the photocopy and not
on the original image or electronic copy.
12.8 If several illustrations are treated as components
of a single composite figure they should be designated
by capital letters.
12.9 Note that the word ‘Figure’ should be written out
in full, both in the text and the captions and should begin
with a capital ‘F’ (but see 14.7 for taxonomic papers).
12.10 In the text the figure reference is then written as
in the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B)
are...’
12.1 1 In captions, ‘FIGURE’ is written in capital letters.
12.12 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on fig-
ures.
12.13 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers,
voucher specimens should be given in the relevant cap-
tion.
12.14 Figures are numbered consecutively with Ara-
bic numerals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author’s name and an
indication of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.15 Captions of figures should not be pasted under
the photograph or drawing and should also not be
included in any electronic version of the figures.
12.16 Captions of figures should be collected together
and typed at the end of the MS and headed Captions for
figures.
Bothalia 41,2 (2011 )
381
12.17 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text
where they would like the figures to appear.
12.18 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures
returned must inform the editor in the original covering
letter and must mark each original 'To be returned to
author’.
12.19 Authors wishing to use illustrations already pub-
lished elsewhere must obtain written permission before
submitting the manuscript and inform the editor of this
fact.
12.20 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic arti-
cles include dot maps as figures to show the distribution
of taxa. Maps will be reduced to column width (80 mm):
the symbols and numbers used must be large enough to
stand reduction. The maps should show: numbered grid
lines of latitude and longitude; the provinces of South
Africa; and a scale line. Maps of neighbouring countries
should be treated in the same way, with bordering states
clearly labelled. For orientation purposes, a small inset
map should appear in a comer of the figure.
12.21 Arc View GIS maps are acceptable. The layout
representing all the appropriate themes (including grid
lines) should be submitted as an encapsulated postscript
file (EPS).
12.22 Colour figures are permitted only if: a) it will
clarify the article and b) the cost of reproduction and
printing is borne by the author.
12.23 Magnification of figures in the caption should be
given for the size as submitted.
13 TEXT
13.1 Asa rule, authors should use the plant names (but
not of all authors of plant names — see 13.6) as listed in
PRECIS (National Herbarium PREtoria Computerised
Information System).
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usu-
ally italicized, with the author citation (where relevant;
see 13.6) not italicized. Exceptions include names of
new taxa in the abstract, correct names given in the syn-
opsis or in paragraphs on species excluded from a given
supraspecific group in taxonomic articles; in checklists
and in indices, where the position is reversed, correct
names are not italicized and synonyms are italicized.
13.3 Names above generic level are not italicized.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy, the complete
scientific name of a plant (with author citation) should
be given at the first mention in the text. The generic
name should be abbreviated to the initial thereafter,
except where intervening references to other genera with
the same initial could cause confusion (see 16.6).
13.5 In normal text. Latin words are italicized, but in
the synopsis of a species, Latin words such as nom. mid.
and et al. are not italicized (see 16.4, 17.2).
13.6 In accordance with Gamock-Jones & Webb
(1996) in Taxon 45: 285, 286, authors of plant names
are not to be added to plant names except in taxonomic
papers. Names of authors of plant names should agree
with the list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, entitled. Authors of plant names , edited by R.K.
Brummitt & C.E. Powell (1992).
13.7 Modem authors not included in the list should
use their full name and initials when publishing new
plant names. Other author names not in the list should be
in agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written
out in full, without initials, except in the synonymy in
taxonomic articles where they are treated like names of
authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are italicized whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also italicized, e.g. Acocks 14407.
13.10 Surnames beginning with 'De’, 'Du' or ‘Van’
begin with a capital letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the Interna-
tional System of Units (SI). In taxonomic papers only
mm and m, should be used; in ecological papers cm or
m should be used.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca (see 17.8).
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelt out in normal
text, and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic
numerals.
13.14 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used
throughout. Write 2. 0-4. 5 (not 2^4.5 ) and 2. 0-4. 5 6-9.
When counting members write 2 or 3 (not 2-3), but 2^1.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations
ending with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition =
edn; editor = ed. ); after units of measure; after compass
directions; after herbarium designations; after countries,
e.g. USA and after well-known institutions, e.g. CSIR.
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys
should be used with couplets numbered la- lb, 2a-2b.
etc. (without full stops thereafter).
13.17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no num-
bering.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in the
following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on elongated stem; a submerged aquatic
with only capitula exserted ... lb. £ setaceum var. pumilum
1 b Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small marsh plants,
ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when habitat dries up;
capitula without coarse white setae; receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white .. .2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black . . . 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to densely covered
with short setae:
13.19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred
to wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
382
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
13.20 The word Figure should be written out in full and
should begin with a capital F, also in captions where the
whole word is in capital letters (see 12.8-12.11).
1 4 SPECIES TRE ATMENT IN TAXONOMIC PAPERS
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example ( 1 7.2), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (bold, not italicized) is to be
followed by its author citation (italicized) and the full
literature reference, with the name of the publication
written out in full (not italicized).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including
those of the synonyms, should only reflect author, page
and year of publication, e.g. C.E.FIubb. in Kew Bulletin
15: 307 (1960); Boris et al.: 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967);
Sims: t. 38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist
of paragraphs commencing, where possible, with itali-
cized leader words such as flowering time, etymology’,
diagnostic characters, distribution and habitat , with a
colon following the leader word and the first word of the
sentence beginning with a lower case letter.
14.5 When more than one species of a given genus is
dealt with in a paper, the correct name of each species
should be prefixed by a sequential number followed by
a full stop. Infraspecific taxa are marked with small let-
ters, e.g. lb., 12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written as in 13.6, irrespec-
tive of whether the person in question is cited as the
author of a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word 'figure’ is written as 'fig.’, and ‘t.’ is
used for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’ (but see 12.9 for normal
text).
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations
of the species in question may be cited in a paragraph
commencing with the word Illustrations followed by a
colon. This paragraph is given after the last paragraph of
the synonymy, see 1 7.2.
14.9 When new combinations are made, the full litera-
ture reference must be given for the basionym, e.g.:
Antimima saturata (L. Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann ,
comb. nov.
Ruschia saturata L. Bolus in Notes on Mesembrianthemum and
allied genera, part 2: 122 (1929). Mesembryanthemum atrocinctum
N.E.Br.: 32 (1930). Type: PUlans BOL18952 (BOL, holo.-photol).
14.10 Treatment of subspecies. Example:
37. Acacia robusta Burch., Travels in the interior
of southern Africa: 442 ( 1 824); Flarv.: 281 ( 1 862); Oliv.:
349 (1871) pro parte excl. specim. Welwitsch ; Palmer
& Pitman: 807 (1973). Type: Cape Province, Kuruman
Dist. Takoon [Litakun], Burchell 2265 (K., holo.!).
[The species description encompassing the subspecific characteristics
and notes on distribution should follow here.]
Two subspecies are distinguished:
Leaf rachis glabrous or almost so; pods straight or slightly
curved 37a. subsp. robusta
Leaf rachis sparsely to densely pubescent; pods usually ± fal
cate 37b. subsp. clavigera
37a. subsp. robusta.
Brenan in Flora zambesiaca 3,1 : 103 (1970); Ross: 37
(1971).
A. robusta Burch.: 442 (1824). [this is the basionym]
[The diagnostic description of the subspecies or reference to above key
and notes on distribution should follow here.]
37b. subsp. clavigera ( E.Mey .) Brenan in Flora
zambesiaca 3,1: 104 (1970); Ross: 193 (1973). Type:
Natal, near Port Natal [Durban], Drege s.n. (K, iso.!; P,
fragm.!).
A. clavigera E.Mey., Commentariorum 1: 168 (1836); Benth.: 510
(1875); Brenan: 365 (1958).
[The diagnostic description of the subspecies or reference to above key
and notes on distribution should follow here.]
15 CITATION OF SPECIMENS
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should
be given (if available): country (if not in RSA), prov-
ince, grid reference (at least for new taxa), locality as
given by original collector, modem equivalent of col-
lecting locality in square brackets (if relevant, e.g. Port
Natal [now Durban]), quarter-degree square, date of
collection (optional), collector’s name and collecting
number (both italicized).
15.2 The abbreviation s.n. (sine numero) is given after
the name of a collector who usually assigned numbers
to his collections but did not do so in the specimen in
question (see 15.11), or the herbarium number can then
be cited with no space between the herbarium and its
number e.g. Marloth SAM691 (see 17.2). The herbaria
in which the relevant type(s) are housed are indicated by
means of the abbreviations given in the latest edition of
Index Herbariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are men-
tioned first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria
are arranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
15.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclama-
tion mark (!) which of the types have been personally
examined.
15.5 If only a photograph, microfiche, electronic or
Aluka image was seen, write as follows: Anon. 422 (X,
holo.-BOL, photo.!), or Anon. 422 (X, holo.-Aluka
image, website accessed 14-08-2009), or (SDNH, holo.
e!).
1 5.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for cor-
rect names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lec-
totypify synonyms.
15.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen,
this should be indicated by using the phrase ‘here desig-
nated’ (see 17.2). If reference is made to a previously
Bothalia 41,2 (201 1 )
383
selected lectotype or neotype, the name of the designat-
ing author and the literature reference should be given. In
cases where no type was cited, and none has subsequently
been nominated, this may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species and
a few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system: Provinces/countries
(typed in capitals) should be cited in the following order:
Namibia, Botswana, Limpopo (previously Northern Trans-
vaal, Northern Province), North-West (previously north-
eastern Cape and southwestern Transvaal), Gauteng (previ-
ously PWV), Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal),
Free State (previously Orange Free State), Swaziland,
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), Lesotho, and Northern
Cape, Western Cape and Eastern Cape (Figure 1 ).
15.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical
sequence.
15.10 Locality records for specimens should preferably
be given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from
the same one-degree square are given in alphabetical
order, i.e (-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the
same quarter-degree square are arranged alphabetically
according to the collectors' names; the quarter-degree
references must be repeated for each specimen cited.
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in
which a collection was seen should be given in brackets
after the collection number; the codes are separated by
commas. The following example will explain the proce-
dure:
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 km E of Nongoma, (-
DD). 10-10-1960, Pelser 354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der
Merwe 4789 (BOL, M). 2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB),
Smith 234 ; Koffiefontein, (-AB). Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak
Forest Station, (-CC), 8 July 1905, Marriot s.n. (KMG); Wilgerfon-
tein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown: Sterkstroom, Stn'dom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all major
works of this nature it is assumed that the author has
investigated the relevant material in all major herbaria and
that he has provided the specimens seen with determinavit
labels. It is assumed further that the author has submitted
distribution maps for all relevant taxa and that the distribu-
tion has been described briefly in words in the text. Under
the heading ‘Vouchers’ no more than five specimens
should be cited, indicating merely the collector and the
collector’s number (both italicized). Specimens are alpha-
betically arranged according to collector’s name. If more
than one specimen by the same collector is cited, they are
arranged numerically and separated by a comma. A collec-
tor’s name and the voucher number(s) is separated from
the next collector by a semicolon. The purpose of the cited
specimens is not to indicate distribution but to convey the
author's concept of the taxon in question.
15.14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed
are indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the
latest edition of Index Herbariorum. They are given
between brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated
by commas behind every specimen as in the following
example:
Vouchers: Arnold 64 (PRE); Fisher 840 (NFI, NU, PRE); Flanagan
831 (GRA, PRE), 840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe
6161. 6163. 6405 (BOL); Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, list them
together before Acknowledgements under the head-
ing Specimens examined. They are arranged alphabeti-
cally by the collector’s name and then numerically for
each taxon. The species is indicated in brackets by the
number that was assigned to it in the text and any infra-
specific taxa by a small letter; this number follows the
specimen number. If more than one genus is dealt with
in a given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the inter-
national herbarium designation. Note that the name of
the collector and the collection number are italicized:
Acocks 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P; 12497 (2.1b) BM, K, PRE. Archer
1507 (1.4) BM, G.
Barker 9738 (1) NBG; 1916 (2) NBG; 295. 4766. 9478, 9796. 10330
(4) NBG; 1919 (5) BOL, NBG; 1917,1923, 1935, 2570. 2606. 2646.
3332, 4198. 4858, 10534, 10801 (5) NBG. Burchell 2847 (2.8c) MB,
K. Burman 2401 (3.3) MO, S. B.L. Burtt 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
Esterhuysen 11497 ( 1 ) BOL; 1433 (5) BOL; 71402 (5) NBG.
16 SYNONYMS
16.1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of
southern Africa, all synonyms based on types of south-
ern African origin, or used in southern African literature,
should be included.
16.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg.
after the reference, followed by non with the author and
date, if there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda (nom. mid.) and invalidly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to
cite them, for example if they have been used in promi-
nent publications.
16.4 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in
the synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. mid.,
et al. are not italicized (see 13.5, 1 7.2).
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically
into groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. syno-
nyms based on the same type, and the groups should be
arranged chronologically by basionyms, except for the
basionym of the correct name which is dealt with in the
paragraph directly after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given syn-
onymy it should be abbreviated to the initial, except
where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 13.4).
17 DESCRIPTION AND EXAMPLE OF SPECIES
TREATMENT
17.1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should,
where possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality;
underground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be
384
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
easily described for the whole plant). Stems/branches.
Bark. Stipules. Leaves : arrangement, petiole absent/
present, pubescence; blade: shape, measurements, apex,
base, texture, colour; margin; midrib: above/below;
petiole. Inflorescence: type, shape, measurements, posi-
tion; bracts/bracteoles, involucral bracts: inner, outer.
Flowers: shape, measurements, sex, colour. Receptacle.
Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androecium. Gynoecium. Fruit.
Seeds (apply the same sequence of relevant features as
in flowers). Flowering time. Chromosome number (ref-
erence). Conservation status. Figure number (word writ-
ten out in full).
17.2 Example (not factual for this species):
1. Englerophytum magalismontanum ( Sond .)
T.D.Penn., The genera of Sapotaceae: 252 ( 1991 ). Type:
Gauteng, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL,
photo.!).
Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine & Hemsl.: 307
(1960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon: 75 (1980).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalis-
montana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 1 05 (1958); Justin: 97 (1973).
Clvysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiern: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiern) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958); Justin
et al.: 98 (1973). Types: Angola. Wehvitsch 4828 (BM, lecto.!, here
designated; PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch s.n. (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4. t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
39 (1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: without locality and collector [B,
holo.f; K.!, P, lecto. e!, designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 38 (1958),
PRE!,S!,W!,Z!].
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpl.: 590
(1823); D.Bakker: 167 (1929); H.Fr.: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720 (1968); Palmer: 34 (1969).
Type: Mpumalanga, Tzaneen Dist., Granville in Herb. Pillans K48625
(K, holo.!; G!, P!, PRE!, S!-Aluka image, website accessed 14-08-
2009).
B. fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19 (1915); Henkel:
226 ( 1 934); Stapelton: 6 ( 1 954).
Illustrations: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?); Codd: 73
(1964); Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long, erect
or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Bark smoothish,
pale, beige-brown, flaking; lenticellate, splitting longi-
tudinally. Stipules paired, spines up to 50 * 45 x ± 2 mm,
unmistakeably large and flattened, roughly triangular in
outline, the flared basiscopic lobe margins folded over in
larger stipules, spines held at ± 90° to stem. Stem erect,
simple or 1- or 2-branched, either from base or from upper
stem nodes. Leaves linear to oblanceolate, 3—1 0(— 23)
x 1 .0—1 .5(— 4.0) mm, obtuse, base broad, half-clasping.
Heads/Inflorescence heterogamous, campanulate, 7-8 x
5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of axillary shoots; involucral
bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner exceeding flowers, tips subo-
paque, white, very acute. Receptacle nearly smooth. Flow-
ers ± 23-30, 7-11 male, 16-21 bisexual, yellow, tipped
pink. Stamens unilateral and declinate; filaments 7-9 mm
long, exserted for 7-8 mm; anthers 3-4 mm long, dull pink.
Ovaty ovoid, ± 3.5 mm long; style dividing near apex of
anthers, style branches 3^1 mm long, recurved. Pappus
bristles very many, equalling corolla, scabridulous. Cap-
sules/achenes subglobose, 3-lobed, 6-7 mm long. Seeds
tetrahedral, colliculate, ± 2 mm long. Flowering time:
September. Chromosome number: 2n = 22. Figure 23B.
1 7.3 As a rule, shape should be given before measure-
ments.
17.4 In general, if an organ has more than one of the
parts being described, use the plural, otherwise use the sin-
gular, for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.5 Language must be as concise as possible, using
participles instead of verbs.
1 7.6 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.2.
17.7 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens. A hyphen is a short stroke joining two sylla-
bles of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with
no space between the letter and the stroke. An N-dash
(en) is a longer stroke commonly used instead of the
word ‘to’ between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use
it between words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate
to lanceolate’; it is produced by typing three hyphens
with spaces in between, or in MS Word the code is alt +
0150. An M-dash (em) is a stroke longer than an N-dash
and is used variously, e.g. in front of a subspecific epi-
thet instead of the full species name; it is produced
by typing two hyphens with spaces in between, or in
MS Word the code is alt + 0 1 5 1 . See also 2. 1 0-2. 1 2.
1 7.8 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describ-
ing shape, measurements and dimensions (see 13.12).
17.9 The decimal point replaces the comma in all units
of measurement, e.g. leaves 1 .0-1.5 mm long.
18 NEW TAXA
18.1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied
by at least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not pro-
vide full-length Latin descriptions unless they have the
required expertise in Latin at their disposal.
18.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa
be accompanied by a good illustration, preferably a line
drawing, or a photograph (second choice) and a distri-
bution map.
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard , sp. nov., H. alsi-
noidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatulatis),
inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis, flo-
ribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphrodito-
rum aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitu-
lis minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta,
mucronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-
lanato- arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanu-
lata, 3.5- 4.0 x 2.5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas
cymosas terminates aggregata; capitula subterminalia
interdum solitaria vel 2 vel 3 ad apices ramulorum nudo-
rum ad 30 mm longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seri-
atae, gradatae, exteriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae,
dorso lanatae, seriebus duabus interioribus subaequali-
bus et llores quasi aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
385
niveis vix radiantibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores
± 35^1. Achenia 0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis prae-
dita. Pappi setae multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus
scabridis, basibus non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richters-
veld, (-CC), ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stink-
fontein, kloof in hill south of road, annual, disc whitish,
7-11-1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
24 FSA CONTRIBUTIONS
24.1 Figures and text must conform to Bothalia for-
mat.
24.2 These articles will be considered as a full contri-
bution to the Flora of southern Africa and will be listed
as published in the 'Plan of Flora of southern Africa
which appears in all issues of the FSA series.
19 PROVINCES OF SOUTH AFRICA (Oct. 1996)
FIGURE 1. — 1, Western Cape; 2, Eastern Cape; 3, Northern Cape; 4,
Free State (previously Orange Free State); 5, KwaZulu-Natal
(previously Natal); 6, North-West (previously northeastern Cape
and southwestern Transvaal); 7, Gauteng (previously PWV); 8,
Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal); 9, Limpopo (previ-
ously Northern Transvaal, Northern Province).
20 PROOFS
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the edi-
tor as soon as possible. Do not add any new information.
21 REPRINTS
Reprints will no longer be issued. A PDF file of the
article will be sent via the E-mail to authors and co-
authors. It is for private use only, the SANBI copyright
protects it from being used in another publication.
22 DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide:
Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden , Botanical Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society, Flora of Australia, Smithso-
nian Contributions to Botany, South African Journal of
Botany (including instructions to authors of taxonomic
papers), South Afi-ican Journal of Science.
23 ADDRESS OF EDITOR
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor, Both-
alia, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pri-
vate Bag X 1 0 1 . Pretoria 000 1 .
25 PLACE NAMES
Ensure that local place names are correct. If in doubt,
consult the Internet at
http://sagns.dac.gov.za/searchplacenamedatabase.asp
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4, 13.15, 15.2, 15.14, 16.6
abstract, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 7, 13.2
acknowledgements, 2.4, 9
address of
authors, 2.3, 4
editor, 23
alphabetical, 6, 10.9, 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Aluka image, 15.5, 17.2
Arc View GIS maps, 12.21
Arabic numerals, 1 1.1, 12.14, 13.13
author) s), 1.3, 2.1, 2.3, 4, 10.14, 12.17-12.19
address, 2.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 2.3, 10.2, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 12.14, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3, 14.6, 15.7
names of plant names, 5, 13.1. 13.2, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
senior, 10.10
basionym, 14.10
book reviews, 1.1, 2.4
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
Bothalia, 1,2.2, 11.2, 24.1
brief taxonomic articles, 15.8
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 13.6
c., 13.12, 17.8
ca, 13.12, 17.8
Cape. 15.8, 18.3, 19
capital letters, 10.11, 11.2, 12.8, 12.9, 12.11, 13.20, 15.8
captions, 2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 11.2, 12.3, 12.9, 12.11-12.13, 12.15, 12.16,
12.23, 13.20
CD, 3.2, 3.8, 3.11
CDR file, 3.9
checklist, 13.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 17.2
chronological sequence, 10.3, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
of specimens, 15
cm, 13.1 1
collection
date, 15.1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.14
collector, 13.9, 15.1. 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15
colon, 2.13, 14.4, 14.8
colour figures, 12.22
comma, 2.13, 15.3, 15.11, 15.13, 15.14, 17.9
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.8
congress proceedings, 10.14
contents, 8
CorelDraw up to version 14, 3.9
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
deadline dates for submission of MS, 1.6
386
Bothalia 41.2 (201 1 )
decimal point, 1 7.9
description and example of species treatment, 1 7
determinavit labels, 15.13
dimension ranges, 1 7.6
discussion, 2.4, 14.4
distribution maps, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
DOC, 12.5
documents consulted, 22
dot maps, 12.20-12.23, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 2.1
space, 2.13
dpi (dots per inch), 12.3-12.6
drawing paper, 12.1
drawings, 3.7, 12.1-12.3
Eastern Transvaal, see Mpumalanga, 15.8, 19
e!, 15.5, 17.2
edition, 13.15
editor, 1.5, 12.18, 13.15, 23
editorial
board, 1 .4
policy, 1
electronic
copy, 12.7
files, 3, 3.2, 3.8-3.10, 12.3-12.6
image, 15.5, 17.2
submissions of graphics, tables, 11, 12
E-mail, 3.2, 3.8, 21
encapsulated postscript file (EPS), 3.9, 12.21
EPS file, 3.9, 12.21
etal ., 10.2, 13.5, 14.3, 17.2
example of
new taxa, 18.3
species treatment, 17.2
exclamation mark, 2.13, 15.4
EXCEL file, 12.4, 12.5
family name, 5, 6.7
fig., 14.7
figure(s), 12, 13.20, 14.7, 17.1
colour, 12.22
electronic submissions of, 12
reduction of, 12.1, 12.3, 12.20
returned, 12.18
file
DOC, 12.5
electronic, 3, 3.2
extensions, 3.9
CDR, 3.9
EPS, 3.9, 12.21
EXCEL, 12.4, 12.5
JPG,
PDF, 12.5,21
POWERPOINT, 12.5
RTF, 3.3
TIF, 3.9, 12.3-12.6
firewall, 3.8
first author, 1 0.2
first language, 1 .3
flora, 10.14
Flora of southern Africa, 24
footnote, 3.4
Free State (previously Orange Free State), 15.8, 19
FSA contributions, 24
FTP site, 3.8
full stop, 2.13, 13.15, 13.16, 14.5
GARNOCK-JONES, P.J. & WEBB, C.J. 1996. The requirement to cite
authors of plant names in botanical journals. Taxon 45: 285, 286, 13.6
Gauteng (previously PWV), 15.8, 17.2, 19
genera, 13.2
generic name, 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area, 7.2
granting agencies, 2.3
graphics, 3.7
electronic submissions of, 12
graphs, 3.7, 12.4
grid reference system, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 3.4 3.6
sequence of, 2.3, 2.4
herbaria, 15.2, 15.3, 15.1 1, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code, 15.1 1
designations, 13.15, 15.15
numbers, 15.2
voucher specimens, 12.13, 13.19
here designated, 15.7, 17.2
histograms, 12.4
holo., 14.10, 15.3, 15.5, 17.2, 18.3
holotype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.9
hyphen, 2.10-2.12, 17.7
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations, 12.1-12.3, 12.8, 12.19, 14.8, 17.2
previously published, 12.19
image files, 3.8-3.10
indentations, 3.4, 3.6
Index Herbariorum, 15.2, 15.14
index of names, 2.4
indices, 13.2
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9, 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10.14
in preparation, 10.14
in press, 10. 14
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 13.1 1
invalidly published names, 16.3
italics, 3.5, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13, 15.15
journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.14
names of, 10.4, 10.13
JPG file, 12.3-12.6
justify, 2.8
keys, 2.16,3.4, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18, 14.10
keywords, 2.3, 2.4, 6
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), 15.8, 19
language, 1.3
Latin, 13.5, 16.4
descriptions, 18.1
layout, 2.2, 12.6
lecto., 15.6, 15.7, 17.2
lectotype, 15.6, 15.7, 17.2
Limpopo (previously Northern Transvaal, Northern Province), 15.8, 19
line
drawings, 2.1, 12.1, 18.2
spacing, 2.1
literature
references, 2.1, 10, 14.2, 14.3, 14.8, 14.9
within synonymy, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
locality, 15.1, 15.10
location, 6.7
m, 13.11
magnification of figures, 12.12, 12.23
manuscript
language, 1 .3, 1 7.5
requirements, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,2
sequence, 2.3, 2.4
map
Arc View GIS, 12.21
distribution, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2, 19
dot, 12.20
neighbouring countries, 12.20
M-dash, 2.12, 17.7
mm, 13.11
margin, 2.1,2.16, 3.4, 17.1
material, 2.3, 2.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.1, 17.3, 17.8, 17.9
methods, 2.4, 6. 10.3
microfiche, 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.14
monograph, 2.4, 15.13, 16.1
Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal), 15.8, 19
MSWord, 2.7, 2.1 1, 2.12, 2.15, 3.3, 3.5, 17.7
name(s)
collector’s, 15.10
illegitimate, 16.2
invalidly published, 16.3
Bothalia 41,2 (2011)
387
of author(s), 2.3, 10.2, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 12.14, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3,
14.6, 15.7
name(s) (cont.)
of authors of plant names, 5, 7.3, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
of publications, 13.8
Natal, see KwaZulu-Natal, 15.8, 19
N-dash, 2.11, 10.7, 17.7
neighbouring countries, 12.20
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4, 14.9
taxa, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
non-breaking space, 2.7
normal style, 3.1
Northern
Province, see Northern Transvaal, 15.8, 19
Transvaal, see Northern Province, Limpopo, 15.8, 19
North-West, 15.8, 19
notes, 1, 2.4
technical. 10.14
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.2
herbarium, 15.2
numbering, 12.7, 13.13
offigures, 12.7, 12.14, 17.1
of keys, 13.16, 13.17
of pages, 2.5
of taxa, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.14
obituaries, 1.1, 2.4, 10.7
Orange Free State, see Free State, 15.8, 19
original drawings/figures, 12.1-12.3, 12.7, 12.18
page charges, 1 .5
paragraghs, 3.6
PDF file, 12.5,21
pencil drawings, 12.2
permission (written)
to copy material, 3.8
to use previously published material (text and illustrations), 12.19
pers. comm., 10.5, 10.8
personal communications (pers. comm.), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 2.1, 12.6, 12.7
photograph, 3.7, 12.3, 12.5, 12.6, 12.15, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 12.6, 12.7
plant
collectors, 13.9
name, 5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
POWERPOINT file, 12.5
PRECIS (National Herbarium PREtoria Computerised Information
System), 13.1
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.14
proofs, 20
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8
of South Africa, 15.8, 19
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10.10
year of, 10.9, 14.3
PWV, see Gauteng, 15.8, 19
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 2.15
reduction of
figures. 12.1, 12.3, 12.20
tables, 1 1 .3
referees, 1.4
reference(s), 2.4, 2.5, 10.6, 10.7-10.9, 10.14
figure, 12.10
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
list, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 2.1, 10
report, 10.14
reprints, 21
requirements for manuscript, 2
results, 2.4
revision, 2.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
RTF file, 3.3
scale bar, 12.7, 12.12
scan/scanning, 12.1, 12.3, 12.5
semicolon, 2.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 2.3, 2.4
short notes, 1.1, 2.4
space
double, 2.13
non-breaking, 2.7
one, 2.16
special characters, 2.6
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14.1-14.9
specimens examined, 2.4, 15.15
square brackets, 15.1, 17.2
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN. R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
style(s), 3.1, 3.4
submission of MS, 1.2, 1.6
subspecies treatment in taxonomic papers, 14.10
surnames, 13.10
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 13.8, 14.8, 16.6
t„ 14.3, 14.7, 17.2
table(s), 2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 11
electronic submissions, 1 1
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
tabs, 3.4
taxa
name of, 5, 7.4, 10.8. 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.13, 12.20, 13.2, 13.6, 13.8, 13.11, 14
revision, 8
treatment
species, 14.1-14.9
subspecies, 14.10
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4
technical note. 10.14
text, 2.1, 3.7, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9, 11.1, 12.9, 12.10, 12.14,
12.17, 13, 15.13, 15.15, 16.4
thesis, 10.14
TIF file, 3.9, 12.3-12.6
times sign, 2.14
title, 2.3,5, 6.9, 6.11
of books. 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
page, 2.3, 2.5
tracked changes, 3.11
Transvaal, 15.8, 17.2, 19
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.5, 17.2
here designated, 15.7, 17.2
not designated, 15.7
specimen, 15.1
units of measure, 13.11, 13.15, 17.9
unpublished article, 10.14
voucher(s) specimens, 12.13, 13.19, 15.13, 15.4
World list of scientific periodicals , 10.13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
—
PLAN OF FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
This project has been discontinued. Occasional contributions to the
Flora are published in Bothalia under the title FSA contributions (see
inside front cover). Exotic families are marked with an asterisk.
Published volumes and parts are shown in bold.
INTRODUCTORY VOLUMES
The genera of southern African flow ering plants, Vols 1 (1975) and
2 (1976). Replaced by Seed plants of southern Africa: families and
genera, published as Strelitzia 10 (2000).
Vol. 1: Dicotyledons (1975)
Vol. 2: Monocotyledons (1976)
Botanical exploration of southern Africa (1981). Edn 2 published
as Strelitzia 26 (2010).
CRYPTOGAM VOLUMES
Charophyta (as Vol. 9 in 1978)
Bryophyta: Part 1: Musci:
Fascicle 1: Sphagnaceae, Andreaeaceae, Fissidentaceae, Nano-
bryaceae, Archidiaceae, Ditrichaceae, Seligeriaceae,
Dicranaceae, Calymperaceae, Encalvptaceae, Pottiaceae.
Brvobartramiaceae, Grimmiaceae (1981)
Fascicle 2: Gigaspermaceae, Ephemeraceae, Funariaceae,
Splachnaceae, Brvaceae, Mniaceae, Eustichiaceae, Rhizogo-
niaceae, Aulacomniaceae, Bartramiaceae (1987)
Fascicle 3: Erpodiaceae, Rhachitheciaceae, Ptychomitriaceae,
Orthotrichaceae, Rhabdoweisiaceae, Racopilaceae, Fon-
tinalaceae, Wardiaceae, Hedwigiaceae, Cryphaeaceae,
Leucodontaceae, Prionodontaceae, Trachypodaceae, Ptero-
bryaceae, Meteoriaceae, Leptodontaceae, Neckeraceae,
Thamnobryaceae, Hookeriaceae (1998)
Fascicle 4: Fabroniaceae, Leskeaceae, Thuidiaceae, Rigodiaceae,
Amblystegiaceae. Brachytheciaceae, Entodontaceae, Plagothe-
ciaceae, Catagoniaceae, Sematophyllaceae, Hypnaceae, Hylo-
comiaceae, Polytrichaceae
Hepatophyta: Part 1: Marchantiopsida: Fascicle 1: Targioniaceae,
Lunulariaceae, Avtoniaceae, Cleveaceae, Exormothecaceae.
Marchantiaceae, Oxymitraceae. Ricciaceae (1999)
Anthocerotophyta
Pteridophyta (1986)
FLOWERING PLANTS VOLUMES
Vol. 1: Stangeriaceae, Zamiaceae, Podocarpaceae, Pinaceae*,
Cupressaceae, Welwitschiaceae, Typhaceae, Zosteraceae,
Potamogetonaceae, Ruppiaceae, Zannichelliaceae, Najada-
ceae, Aponogetonaceae, Juncaginaceae, Alismataceae, Hv-
drocharitaceae (1966)
Vol. 2: Poaceae
Vol. 3: Cyperaceae, Arecaceae, Araceae, Lemnaceae, Flagellariaceae
Vol. 4: Part 1: Restionaceae
Part 2: Xyridaceae, Eriocaulaceae, Commelinaceae, Ponte-
deriaceae, Juncaceae (1985)
Vol. 5: Part 1:
Fascicle 1: Aloaceae (First part): Aloe (2000)
Fascicle 2: Asphodelaceae (First part): Knipliofia (2005)
Colchicaceae, Eriospermaceae, Asphodelaceae ( Chorto -
lirion , 1995 in Bothalia 25: 31-33; Poellnitzia, 1995 in
Bothalia 25: 35, 36)
Part 2: Alliaceae, Liliaceae*, Hyacinthaceae, Agavaceae (1996
in Bothalia 26: 31-35)
Part 3: Dracaenaceae, Asparagaceae, Luzuriagaceae, Smi-
lacaceae (1992)
Vol. 6: Haemodoraceae, Amaryllidaceae, Hypoxidaceae, Tecophilae-
aceae, Velloziaceae, Dioscoreaceae
Vol. 7: Iridaceae: Part 1 : Nivenioideae, Iridoideae
Part 2: Ixioideae:
Fascicle 1: Ixieae (First part): Ixiinae, Tritonii-
nae (1999)
Fascicle 2: Syringodea , Romulea (1983)
Vol. 8: Musaceae, Strelitziaceae, Zingiberaceae (1998 in Bothalia 28:
35-39), Cannaceae*, Burmanniaceae, Orchidaceae ( Holothrix ,
1996 in Bothalia 26: 125-140)
Vol. 9: Urticaceae (2001). Casuarinaceae* (2000 in Bothalia 30:
143-146), Piperaceae (2000 in Bothalia 30: 25-30), Salica-
ceae, Myricaceae, Fagaceae*, Ulmaceae (1999 in Bothalia 29:
239-247), Moraceae, Cannabaceae* (1999 in Bothalia 29:
249-252), Proteaceae
Vol. 10: Part 1 : Loranthaceae, Viscaceae (1979), Santalaceae,
Grubbiaceae, Opiliaceae, Olacaceae, Balanophora-
ceae, Aristolochiaceae, Rafflesiaceae, Flydnoraceae,
Polygonaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae,
Nyctaginaceae
Vol. 11: Phytolaccaceae, Aizoaceae, Mesembryanthemaceae
Vol. 12: Portulacaceae, Basellaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Illecebraceae,
Cabombaceae, Nymphaeaceae, Ceratophyllaceae (1997 in
Bothalia 27: 125-128), Ranunculaceae, Menispermaceae,
Annonaceae, Trimeniaceae, Lauraceae, Hemandiaceae,
Papaveraceae, Fumariaceae
Vol. 13: Brassicaceae, Capparaceae, Resedaceae, Moringaceae,
Droseraceae, Roridulaceae, Podostemaceae, Hydrostachy-
aceae (1970)
Vol. 14: Crassulaceae (1985)
Vol. 15: Vahliaceae, Montiniaceae, Escalloniaceae, Pittosporaceae,
Cunoniaceae, Myrothamnaceae, Bruniaceae, Hamamelida-
ceae, Rosaceae, Connaraceae
Vol. 16: Fabaceae:
Part 1: Mimosoideae (1975)
Part 2: Caesalpinioideae (1977)
Part 3: Papilionoideae:
Fascicle 1: Swartzieae-Robinieae
Fascicle 2: Indigofereae
Fascicle 3: Desmodieae, Phaseoleae
Fascicle 4: Psoraleeae-Galegeae
Fascicle 5: Loteae-Liparieae
Fascicle 6: Crotalarieae ( Aspalathus ) (1988)
Fascicle 7: Crotalarieae ( Bolusia-Lebeckia )
Fascicle 8: Crotalarieae ( Lotononis-Wi-borgia )
Fascicle 9: Crotalarieae ( Pearsonia-Argyrolobium ),
Genisteae ( Cytisus-Ulex )
Vol. 17: Geraniaceae, Oxalidaceae
Vol. 18: Part 1: Linaceae. Erythroxylaceae, Zygophyllaceae. Balani-
taceae
Part 2: Rutaceae
Part 3: Simaroubaceae, Burseraceae, Ptaeroxylaceae,
Meliaceae (Aitoniaceae), Malpighiaceae (1986)
Vol. 19: Part 1: Polygalaceae, Dichapetalaceae
Part 2: Euphorbiaceae, Callitrichaceae, Buxaceae (1996 in
Bothalia 26: 37-40)
Part 3: Anacardiaceae: Fascicle 1: Rhus (1993)
Fascicle 2: remaining genera
Part 4: Aquifoliaceae (1994 in Bothalia 24: 163-166)
Vol. 20: Celastraceae, Icacinaceae, Sapindaceae, Melianthaceae,
Greyiaceae, Balsaminaceae, Rhamnaceae, Vitaceae
Vol. 21: Part 1: Tiliaceae (1984)
Malvaceae, Bombacaceae, Sterculiaceae
Vol. 22: Ochnaceae, Clusiaceae, Elatinaceae, Frankeniaceae,
Tamaricaceae, Canellaceae, Violaceae, Flacourtiaceae,
Turneraceae, Passifloraceae, Achariaceae, Loasaceae,
Begoniaceae, Cactaceae (1976)
Vol. 23: Geissolomataceae, Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Thymelaeaceae,
Lythraceae, Lecythidaceae
Vol. 24: Rhizophoraceae, Combretaceae, Myrtaceae, Melastomataceae,
Onagraceae (1997 in Bothalia 27: 149-165), Trapaceae
(1998 in Bothalia 28: 11-14), Haloragaceae, Gunneraceae,
Araliaceae, Apiaceae, Comaceae
Vol. 25: Ericaceae
Vol. 26: Mvrsinaceae, Primulaceae, Plumbaginaceae, Sapotaceae,
Ebenaceae, Oleaceae, Salvadoraceae, Loganiaceae, Gen-
tianaceae, Apocynaceae (1963)
Vol. 27: Part 1: Periplocaceae, Asclepiadaceae (Microloma-Xysmalo-
bium)
Part 2: Asclepiadaceae (Schizoglossum-Woodia)
Part 3: Asclepiadaceae (Asclepias-Anisotoma)
Part 4: Asclepiadaceae ( Brachystelma , Ceropegia , Rio-
creuxia) (1980)
Asclepiadaceae (remaining genera)
Vol. 28: Part 1: Convolvulaceae (2000)
Part 2: Hydrophyllaceae, Boraginaceae
Part 3: Stilbaceae, Verbenaceae (Vitex, 1996 in Bothalia 26:
141-151)
Part 4: Lamiaceae (1985)
Part 5: Solanaceae, Retziaceae
Vol. 29: Scrophulariaceae
Vol. 30: Part 1: Bignoniaceae, Pedaliaceae, Martyniaceae, Oroban-
chaceae
Part 2: Gesneriaceae, Lentibulariaceae
Part 3: Acanthaceae: Fascicle 1: Justiciinae (1995)
Acanthaceae (remaining genera), Myoporaceae
Vol. 31: Part 1:
Fascicle 1 : Plantaginaceae (1998 in Bothalia 28: 151-157),
Rubiaceae (Rubioideae — First part)
Fascicle 2: Rubiaceae (Rubioideae — Second part): Paeder-
ieae, Anthospermeae, Rubieae (1986)
Fascicle 3: Ixoroideae, Chinchonoideae
Part 2: Valerianaceae, Dipsacaceae, Cucurbitaceae
Vol. 32: Campanulaceae, Sphenocleaceae (2000 in Bothaliu 30:
31-33), Lobeliaceae, Goodeniaceae
Vol. 33: Asteraceae:
Part 1 : Lactuceae, Mutisieae, ‘Tarchonantheae’
Part 2: Vernonieae, Cardueae
Part 3: Arctotideae
Part 4: Anthemideae:
Fascicle 1: Eriocephulus , Lasiospermum (2001)
Fascicle 2: Eumorphia (2011)
Part 5: Astereae
Part 6: Calenduleae
Part 7: Inuleae:
Fascicle 1 : Inulinae
Fascicle 2: Gnaphaliinae (First part) (1983)
Part 8: Heliantheae, Eupatorieae
Part 9: Senecioneae
STRELITZIA
1. Botanical diversity in southern Africa. 1994. B.J. Huntley (ed.).
ISBN 1-874907-25-0.
2. Cyperaceae in Natal. 1995. K.D. Gordon-Gray. ISBN 1-874907-
04-8.
3. Cederberg vegetation and flora. 1996. H.C. Taylor. ISBN
1-874907-28-5.
4. Red Data List of southern African plants. 1996. Craig Hilton-
Taylor. ISBN 1-874907-29-3.
5. Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. 1997. N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer& G.F. Smith (eds). ISBN 1-874907-35-8.
6. Plants of the northern provinces of South Africa: keys and diagnos-
tic characters. 1997. E. Retief & P.P.J. Herman. ISBN 1-874907-
30-7.
7. Preparing herbarium specimens. 1999. Lyn Fish. ISBN 1-919795-
38-3.
8. Bulbinella in South Africa. 1999. Pauline L. Perry. ISBN
1-919795-46-4. OUT OF PRINT.
9. Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. 2000.
P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning. ISBN 0-620-26236-2.
10. Seed plants of southern Africa: families and genera. 2000. O.A.
Leistner (ed.). ISBN 1-919795-51-0.
1 1 . The Cape genus Lachnaea (Thymelaeaceae): a monograph. 2001 .
J.B.P. Beyers. ISBN 1-919795-52-9.
12. The Global Taxonomy Initiative: documenting the biodiversity of
Africa/L’lnitiative Taxonomique Mondiale: documenter la biodi-
versite en Afrique. R.R. Klopper, G.F. Smith & A.C. Chikuni (eds).
2001 . ISBN 1-919795-63-4. OUT OF PRINT.
13. Medicinal and magical plants of southern Africa: an annotated
checklist. 2002. T.H. Arnold, C.A. Prentice, L.C. Hawker, E.E.
Snyman, M. Tomalin, N.R. Crouch & C. Pottas-Bircher. ISBN
1-919795-62-6.
14. Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist. 2003. G. Ger-
mishuizen & N.L. Meyer (eds). ISBN 1-919795-99-5.
15. Heyday of the gymnosperms: systematics and biodiversity of the
Late Triassic Molteno fructifications. 2003. J.M. Anderson & H.M.
Anderson. ISBN 1-919795-98-7.
16. Common names of Karoo plants. 2004. Les Powrie. ISBN
1-874907-16-1.
17. National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment 2004: priorities for biodi-
versity conservation in South Africa. 2005. A. Driver, K. Maze,
M. Rouget, A.T. Lombard, .1. Nel, J.K. Turpie, R.M. Cowling, P.
Desmet, P. Goodman, J. Hands, Z. Jonas, B. Reyers, K. Sink & T.
Strauss. ISBN 1-919976-20-5.
18. A revision of the southern African genus Babiana, Iridaceae: Cro-
coideae. 2007. P. Goldblatt & J.C. Manning. ISBN- 10: 1-919976-
32-9. ISBN-13: 978-1-919976-32-7.
19. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. 2006. L.
Mucina & M.C. Rutherford (eds). ISBN-10: 1-919976-21-3. ISBN-
13: 978-1-919976-21-1.
20. Brief history of the gymnosperms: classification, biodiversity,
phytogeography and ecology. 2007. J.M. Anderson, H.M. Anderson
& C.J. Cleal. ISBN 978-1-919976-39-6.
21 . Molteno ferns: Late Triassic biodiversity in southern Africa. 2008.
H.M. Anderson & J.M. Anderson. ISBN 978-1-919976-36-5.
22. Plants of Angola / Plantas de Angola. 2008. E. Figueiredo & G.F.
Smith. ISBN 978-1-919976-45-7.
23. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa,
Madagascar and neighbouring islands. 2009. J.P. Roux. ISBN 978-
1-919976-48-8.
24. Historical plant incidence in southern Africa. 2009. C.J. Skead.
ISBN 978-1-919976-53-2.
25. Red List of South African plants 2009. 2009. D. Raimondo, L.
von Staden, W. Foden, J.E. Victor, N.A. Helme, R.C. Turner, D.A.
Kamundi & P.A. Manyama (eds). ISBN 978-1-919976-52-5.
26. Botanical exploration of southern Africa, edn 2. 2010. H.F. Glen &
G. Germishuizen. ISBN 978-1-919976-54-9.
27. Botany and horticulture of the genus Freesia (Iridaceae). 2010. J.C.
Manning & P. Goldblatt (with G.D. Duncan, F. Forest, R. Kaiser &
L. Tatarenko). Paintings by Auriol Batten; line drawings by John C.
Manning. ISBN 978-1-919976-58-7.
28. The aloe names book. 2011. O.M. Grace, R.R. Klopper, E. Figueir-
edo & G.F. Smith. ISBN 978-1-919976-64-8.
BIODIVERSITY SERIES
1 . Conserving South Africa’s plants: a South African response to the
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. 2006. C.K. Willis (ed.).
ISBN 1-919976-28-0.
2. The Convention on Biological Diversity: biodiversity, access and
benefit-sharing. A resource for teachers (Grades 10-12). 2006. A.
Solomon & P. le Grange. ISBN 1-919976-30-2.
3. The Convention on Biological Diversity: biodiversity, access and
benefit-sharing. A resource for learners (Grades 10-12). 2006. A.
Solomon & P. le Grange. ISBN 1-919976-31-0.
4. Fynbos Fynmense: people making biodiversity work. 2006. A.
Ashwell, T. Sandwith, M. Barnett, A. Parker & F. Wisani. ISBN
1-919976-29-9.
5. A plan for phylogenetic studies of southern African reptiles:
proceedings of a workshop held at Kirstenbosch, February 2006.
2006. W.R. Branch, K.A. Tolley, M. Cunningham, A.M. Bauer,
G. Alexander, J.A. Harrison, A. A. Turner & M.F. Bates. ISBN
1-919976-33-7.
6. Invasive alien flora and fauna in South Africa: expertise and
bibliography. 2007. C.F. Musil & I.A.W. Macdonald. ISBN 978-1-
919976-35-8.
7. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and develop-
ment projects. 2007. Cape Action for People and the Environment.
ISBN 978-1-919976-37-2.
8. Bird Checklist for South Africa’s National Botanical Gardens.
2008. C.K. Willis, O.E. Curtis & M.D. Anderson (compilers).
ISBN 978-1-919976-41-9.
9. Guidelines for Offshore Marine Protected Areas in South Africa.
2008. K. Sink & C. Attwood. ISBN 978- 1 -9 1 9976-43-3.
10. User profiles for the South African offshore environment. 2008. L.
Atkinson & K. Sink. ISBN 978-1-919976-46-4.
1 1 . Monitoring and evaluation: tools for biodiversity conservation and
development projects. 2008. C.-A. Foulis & J. Whitehead. ISBN
978-1-919976-47-1.
12. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Amfibia wa milima ya Taita. 2009.
G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza & V. Muchai. ISBN 978-1-91 9976-49-
5.
13. South African Red Data Book: butterflies. 2009. G.A. Henning,
R.F. Terblanche & J.B. Ball. ISBN 978-1-919976-51-8.
15. The introduced terrestrial Mollusca of South Africa. 2010. D.G.
Herbert. ISBN 978-1-919976-56-3.
16. Butterflies of South Africa’s National Botanical Gardens. 2010.
C.K. Willis & S.E. Woodhall. ISBN 978-1-919976-57-0.
1 7. Environment & Economy: Mind the Gap. Environmental and
Resource Economics Conference Synthesis Report. 2010. A. Nah-
man (Compiler). ISBN 978-1-919976-62-4.
18. Pollen wasps and flowers of southern Africa. 2010. S.K. Gess &
F.W. Gess. ISBN 978-1-919976-60-0.
1 9. Ensuring a future for South Africa’s frogs: a strategy for conserva-
tion research. 201 1. G.J. Measy (ed.). ISBN 978-1-919976-63-1.
20. Fundraising and marketing: tools for biodiversity conservation
and development projects. 2011. Cape Action for People and the
Environment. ISBN 978-1-919976-67-9.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (2011)
SADC R220.00 Other countries US$55.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
2010/11: SADC R450.00 Other countries US$110.00
2011/12: SADC R450.00 Other countries US$110.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
The history of the
Botanical Research Institute
by Denise Fourie
a reprint of this article in Bothalia 28,2 with an attractive cover.
Price: SADC countries, R30.00/ Other countries US$8.00
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 843-5001 • Fax (012) 804-321 1 • email: bookshop@sanbi.org. za
BOTHALIA
Volume 41,2
CONTENTS
Oct. 2011
1. Ornithoglossum pulchrum (Colchicaceae: Colchiceae), a new species from southern Namibia. D.A. SNIJMAN, B.
NORDENSTAM and C. MANNHEIMER 231
2. Maireana brevifolia (Chenopodiaceae: Camphorosmeae), a new naturalized alien plant species in South Africa.
L. MUCINA and D.A. SNIJMAN 235
3. Taxonomic revision of the genus Thereianthus (Iridaceae: Crocoideae). J.C. MANNING and R GOLD-
BLATT 239
4. Romulea pilosa and R. quartzicola (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), two new species from the southern African winter
rainfall region, with nomenclatural corrections including new names for R. amoena, R. neglecta and R.
rosea var. reflexa. J.C. MANNING, P. GOLDBLATT and A.D. HARROWER 269
5. FSA contributions 19: Asteraceae: Anthemideae: Eumorphia. N. SWELANKOMO 277
6. Review of the genus Xenoscapa (Iridaceae: Crocoideae), including X. grandiflora , a new species from southern
Namibia. J.C. MANNING and R GOLDBLATT ' 283
7. Notes on African plants:
Aizoaceae. New combinations in Antimima and Octopoma (Ruschioideae). C. KLAK 292
Alliaceae. Micromorphology and cytology of Prototulbaghia siebertii, with notes on its taxonomic
significance. C.G. VOSA, S.J. SIEBERT and A.E. VAN WYK 311
Amaryllidaceae. Ammocharis deserticola (Amaryllideae), a new species from Namibia and a key to
species of the genus. D.A. SNIJMAN and H. KOLBERG 308
Apocynaceae (Asclepiadoideae-Ceropegieae). First records of Orbea cooperi in Gauteng and Mpuma-
langa Provinces, FSA region. S.R BESTER and S.M. BERRUTI 295
Asteraceae. Lachnospermum neglectum (Asteroideae: Gnaphalieae), a new and overlooked species from
the Worcester Valley, Western Cape. J.C. MANNING and R GOLDBLATT 304
Asteraceae. Biyomorphe and Dolichothrix (Gnaphalieae-Relhaniinae): taxonomy and nomenclature. M.
KOEKEMOER 324
Cyperaceae. New names and new combinations in Cvperus for southern Africa. C. ARCHER and P.
GOETGHEBEUR .' 300
Fabaceae. A new species of Xiphotheca from the Western Cape, South Africa. A.L. SCHUTTE-VLOK 298
Fabaceae. A new species of Rhvnchosia from the northern provinces of South Africa. G. GERMIS-
HUIZEN ' 319
Hyacinthaceae. Albuca gariepensis (Omithogaloideae), a new species of A. subgen. Namibiogalum
from Gordonia, South Africa, and A. prasina transferred to Ornithogalum. J.C. MANNING and R
GOLDBLATT 314
Hyacinthaceae. Ornithogalum lebaense transferred to Albuca. J.C. MANNING and R GOLDBLATT 297
Iridaceae. Gladiolus diluvialis (Crocoideae), a replacement name for the illegitimate homonym
G. halophilus. J.C. MANNING and R GOLDBLATT 324
Lycopodiophyta: Selaginellaceae. Selaginella nivea, a new lycophyte record for South Africa, with notes
on its habitat. A.W. KLOPPER and R.R. KLOPPER 321
Nyctaginaceae. Notes on Commicarpus in southern Africa, including a new record for Namibia.
M. STRUWIG, S.J. SIEBERT and E.S. KLAASSEN 289
Scrophulariaceae. Anticharis juncea, an overlooked record for South Africa, with notes on its type
localities and flower morphology. H.M. STEYN 301
Vitaceae. A new and an overlooked record of Cvphostemma in Angola. F. DE SOUSA, E. FIGUEIREDO
and G.F. SMITH 294
8. Phytosociological description of norite koppies in the Rustenburg area, North-West Province and refinement of
the distribution of the Norite Koppies Bushveld on the national vegetation classification map of South
Africa. A.J.H. LAMPRECHT, S.S. CILLIERS, A.R. GOTZE and M.J. DU TOIT 327
9. The extended occurrence of Maputaland Woody Grassland further south in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S.J.
SIEBERT, F. SIEBERT and M.J. DU TOIT 341
10. Floristic analysis of domestic gardens in the Tlokwe City Municipality, South Africa. C.S. LUBBE,
S.J. SIEBERT and S.S. CILLIERS 351
1 1 . Miscellaneous notes:
Tribute to Beverley Momberg, technical editor in the publications section of the South African National
Biodiversity Institute. G.F. SMITH 363
12. Obituary: Franz Sebastian Muller (1913-2010). G.F. SMITH and E. FIGUEIREDO 365
13. South African National Biodiversity Institute: publications 1 January 2010 to 3 1 December 2010. Compiler: Y.
STEENKAMP 369
14. Guide for authors to Bothalia 377
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Abstracts/RRM • CABS • CABACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Current Contents, Scisearch, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon : reviews and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from: South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Tel. (012) 843-5000. Fax (012) 804-321 1 . e-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org website: www.sanbi.org. Typesetting and page layout: D. Maree
Printing: Seriti Printing (Pty) Ltd, P.O. Box 24829, Gezina, 0031 Pretoria.
Bothalia Volume 42,1
BS0015