VaqoIil LIBRARIES OMITMOUNIAN INOTITULIUN NOTLIILILONI ern Torey
saiuvugit
“INSTITUTION
_ INSTITUTION
INSTITUTION
TUTION NOLLALILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS Saluvualn LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUT
NVINOSHLINS S3INVUSIT
‘saaael S31MVu tT
cr. < a J
XG = z z z
<8 B D 2
W og)
Y 2 = = F
> = = Ss
7 ae Y) Y) (7p)
a LI BRAR IES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOLLALILSNI Se S3l uve
z “2 3 : : 2
” aus & w” — ~”
= a = oc “ w
se oe : ae Oc = a
5 = o . 3 ex:
Pa od z eal = gs
TUTION = NOILN.LILSNI~NVINOSHLINS 4 iuYVvy g a LIBRARI co ies ome aaa dies
& = = = In 3
o8 > pe > a >
: : = : .. 3
z ” Z - Z 5
el Ae atte be alana SMITHSONIAN een NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS Saluval
SMITHSONIAN
NVINOSHLINS
NVINOSHLINS
SMITHSONIAN
_NVINOSHLIWS
TUTION NOLLNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS sqiuvual LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT
ARIES SMITHSONIAN.
. - ae on
_ Z - ul ;
— + + ee =
ac — se ow Tie.
< Se = < ia
Pe = a xe see
e Ss os = o = S
= = od & od =
YVudiz LIBRARIES iis bemabeulh INSTITUTION NOLLNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S33] uv
ul S a z - z
ow ra ‘ow = wo Oo
= a. > “a 5
ry : & oe a
v, z oa Z e a.
FUTION NOLLNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS $3 iuyvad PTotl B RAR | 1 ES.” SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT
ES = z= cs = <
= z = z i Zz
2 E = E 2 :
> s > = > s
Mera Ww a Ww = Y”)
LIB RAR IES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3i1Y¥Vvuy
me w” > Y) = ”
” coo a” ee nw -
= & . 3 . = -
= ay .
: = = le E e
oi = 5 cc 5 ow
2 wr z ed Zz a
TUTION NOILNLILSNI dade ast S3I¥vVYNsgIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT
; : g : 5: _
peel wo | — fee) — w
5 2 5 2B 5 2
= = i Bed FE: es
= = a 2 E, 2
Zz oO = o z in
wear me rPRrDOnmnaAaAnIeCre CRAITLIOMATIAAD FRAP CORRE ESTER a Sea Ol ae ES Ee PMU IEA be tapi earuyvu
RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS Saiuvugi7] LIBRARI
= ie = i ae 2 .
= “0 = D «WQ a 4 om
5 +e 2 5 2 5 =
a > ae - = - :
ra 2 Z : 2 °
ee —_ WS s a
LLSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3INVU¥aIT SMITHSONIAN NOILNLILS
iy > = “Ss = 2 =
% ps O *# <. O —- Oo
> & = = = = é
rr = a = = =
RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS Saiuvugiq_
NVINOSHLIWS
NOILALILSNI
LIBRARIES
ILSNI S3J!lu¥vua!i1 LIBRARIES
S31YVYGIT LIBRARIES
INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI
SJINVUGIT LIBRARIES
INSTITUTION NOILALILSN
=
U7, pe ow
0 e
— >
- -
RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3Iluvud!t
w” aa a) = a) <
= S = 2 & z 5)
DD ” Oo An 7) we
oO ee Pe | 8 e) aS WX
z = -. = Zz NO
> s >” = >" = »~
ss 2 w = ? NOLLMLILS
- LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION “O
2 i 2 : | @ us
8 oc =a ew Cee. a
= a. ond < i, oA <
ci x Yr a Cc oo ye o
4 : ond 4
YY 88) om om. sas oO
- 2 Ss : - 9
ol :
RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3luvugI1 LIBRARI
O wo © 1 ae oO nt
emo ee] pai
= 23 5 2 5 2
Ee Gy . = = a
“te ‘s, Yoyo f° she re lc we
ee mn : :
poe MO me a) 2 Se
ALSNI NVINOSHLINS S31yuvuatt SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALIL
z O- z w” Pa id 7)
Bo = .! = < Y=
a: ~ /— ond z aw
© be 2 es © , aL. © as 8 3 7 4
2 my uw ” - nN vf |
% a. O ¥ hs © fs te Mf
Yy KE z = = Pa yy ;
; 5 oe . 35
RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS SaI1uvVugi7T LIBRARI
w? > Fs = nee 7p) >
sis Pa, Ww oe aX s rm) =
ee ie — te iil pei ms
=. Wy vd pe = % ne =
<4 Ye Cc , c = c
oc MY ond & =| Oc >
a “Up = E : : :
at y z Bie 2 as z
JISNI NVINOSHLINS S3INYVYUSIT LIBRARIES INSTITUTION NOILOLILS
eee e il ae ra [ Le
‘i i i 2 Li
> _- > j— 2 -
2 - = — Heol -
Bie
be
ay)
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 1, 1964
THE NEOTROPIC DIPLAZONTINAE
(Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)
ae
CLEMENT E. DASCH
PUBLICATIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Contribution Series
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number,
with separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a
volume. Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes
are $12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with
its beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total
less than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders or correspondence to the
American Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
Volume I
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumoni-
dae). 75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
Memoir Series
The Memoirs are for book-length monographs on insects. They are issued as cloth-bound
volumes, at irregular intervals as suitable manuscripts are available. Numbers are sold
separately, or in subscriptions to the series. Subscribers receive a 10% discount from the regu-
lar price. Address orders or correspondence to the American Entomological Institute, 5950
Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
No. 1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1961. A catalogue
and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. 522 pages.
Price: $14.50, postpaid
No. 2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1962. Ichneumonidae of America north
of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. 305 pages, 162 maps,
116 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid ©
No. 3. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5. Sub-
family Diplazontinae. 304 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
Price: $9.50, postpaid
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 1, 1964
THE NEOTROPIC DIPLAZONTINAE
(Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)
By
‘CLEMENT E. DASCH
THE NEOTROPIC DIPLAZONTINAE
By Clement E. Dasch*
INTRODUCTION
The Diplazontinae is a subfamily of parasitic wasps of the family Ichneu-
monidae. They are chiefly parasites of the dipterous family Syrphidae, al-
though they are reported as bred occasionally from lepidopterous and coleop-
terous hosts.
This study deals with the subfamily as it occurs from the United States-
Mexican border to Tierra del Fuego of southern Chile. Within this extensive
area, the species are found primarily at higher elevations or at the more ©
Temperate latitudes of southern South America. The diplazontines of the Neo-
tropical Region are very poorly known. This paper is not intended as an ex-
haustive treatise of the species, but rather as a foundation for future work when
more extensive collections for the area become available. The fauna, as de-
tailed here, includes 5 genera and 52 species. Ten of these species also occur
in the Nearctic Region. | :
The specimens examined are in the collections of the California Academy
of Sciences (San Francisco, Calif.), Canadian National Collection (Ottawa,
Canada), Cornell University (Ithaca, N. Y.), R. R. Dreisbach (Midland,
Mich. ), Harvard University (Cambridge, Mass.), H. K. Townes (Ann Arbor,
Mich.), University of California (Albany, Calif.), and U. S. National Museum
(Washington, D. C.). :
The anatomical terminology used in the paper is largely that of L. Smith
and R. Shenefelt (1956. Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sci., Arts, Lett. 44:165-
219). In the measurements for new species, the holotypic measurement is
first given, followed by the range of paratypic measurements, where these
differ appreciably. The width of the face is taken at the narrowest point below
the antennal fossae. The height of the face is taken from the lower margin of
the antennal fossae to the tentorial pits. The hind ocellar-occipital carinal
line (abbreviated OOC) is the shortest distance from the posterior margin of a
hind ocellus to the occipital carina. The diameter of a hind ocellus (abbrevi-
ated HO) is the widest diameter of a hind ocellus. The width of the petiole is
the greatest width posterior to the spiracle; the length is taken from the base
to the posterior end of the medial region of the segment.
The Diplazontinae are distinguishable from other Ichneumonidae by the
following characteristics:
Length 4-12 mm.; head width 1.2-1.4x height; clypeus transverse, usually
lobed apically, distinct from face laterad of tentorial pits; mandible short and
stout, tridentate, the normal upper tooth being broadly subtruncate or bifid;
*Author’s address: Department of Biology, Muskingum College, New
Concord, Ohio.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. , vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
antenna filiform; flagellum 15-25 segmented; males often bearing tyloids on fla-
gellum; scape short, diagonally excised externally; epomia weakly developed;
notaulus present or lacking; prepectal carina usually complete; sternaulus shal-
low; propodeum often carinate; wing areolet present or lacking, when present
usually triangular; legs slender; two trochanters per leg; tibial spurs 1:2:2;
tarsal claws simple; abdomen sessile; abdominal segments 1-3 depressed,
variably compressed posteriorly; petiole deplanate, lateral margins subparal-
lel, its spiracles projecting and before the middle, a pair of dorsal longitudinal
carinae frequently present; petiolar sternum small, separated; exserted portion
of ovipositor short and slender. See figures 65-69 for the general habitus of
the subfamily.
The study was made in the Museum of Zoology of the University of Michigan
with the aid of a grant from the National Science Foundation. Special thanks
are due Dr. Henry K. Townes for his assistance in the preparation of this re-
port. Figures 65-69, showing the genotypes, were prepared by Kakuzo Yama-
zaki and. are republished from Dasch’s Ichneumon-flies of America North of
Mexico: 5. Subfamily Diplazontinae (1964: Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 3).
In addition to the species treated below, Tymmophorus graculus Grav.
was recorded as Mexican by Gibson and Carillo (1959. Lista de insectos en la
colleccion entomologica de la, oficina de estudios especiales, S. A. G., p. 12).
The present author has not seen this species from the Neotropic Region, so has
not included it. A description of T. graculus may be found in Dasch, 1964,
Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 3: 76.
Key to the Genera of
Neotropic Diplazontinae
1. Notaulus strongly defined on anterior mesoscutum as a distinct groove;
areglel ADSent . 6. oe ea 2
2. Spiracle of third abdominal segment dorsad of lateral suture; tyloids lack-
ing from male antenna; face shagreened; terga of anterior abdominal
segments usually with a transverse pesrnedian impression.
1. Diplazon (p. 3)
Spiracle of third abdominal segment ventrad of lateral suture; tyloids pre-
sent on male antenna; face polished; terga of abdominal segments without
a transverse impression .......... _... 4. Promethes (p. 54)
3. Spiracle of second abdominal segment ventrad of lateral suture; face usually
polished and bearing a pair of vertical depressions between clypeus and
antennal fossae; propodeum usually carinate. ... 5. Sussaba (p. 55)
Spiracle of Second abdominal segment dorsad of lateral suture; face usually
shagreened and lacking vertical depressions; propodeum usually not
Carimate <). eee ee eee ee eS ee a a 4
4. Clypeus usually apically lobed and often impressed along apical margin;
areolet usually present; tyloids present on male antenna (except in pre-
clarus); head, thorax, and abdomen variously sculptured
2. Homotropus (p. 19)
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 3
Clypeus truncate apically with a median vertical sulcus; areolet lacking;
tyloids lacking from male antenna; head, thorax, and abdomen evenly
shagreened and usually weakly punctate, or impunctate.
3. Syrphoctonus (p. 46)
I. Genus DIPLAZON
(Figure 69)
Bassus of authors, not of the genotype. :
Diplazon Nees, 1818. Nov. Acta Acad. Nat. Curios 9:292. Type: Ichneumon
laetatorius Fabricius. Designated by Viereck, 1914.
Length 4.1-9.4 mm.; head transverse, width 1.1-1.4x height; face width
1.65-2.3x height, usually shagreened and lightly punctate, occasionally more
polished; clypeus width 1. 7-2.3x height, apically lobed, shagreened, surface
flattened, separated from face by a definite suture, basal margin somewhat
elevated above level of face; 15-21, but usually 16 or 17 flagellar segments;
antenna usually much shorter than wing length, segments progressively short-
ened from basal to apical segment; sense cones of flagellum usually separated
by more than the width of a sense cone; length of first flagellar segment 2. 7-
5.2x greatest diameter; occipital carina usually narrowly rounded or somewhat
angulate medially; malar space 0.3-0. 7x basal width of mandible; female of
most species with pale inner orbital bars; thorax length 1.6-2.1x mesonotal
width, usually polished and punctate, more seldom shagreened; notaulus strong-
ly impressed on basal 0. 20-0. 25 of mesoscutum; prepectal carina complete ex-
cept in pectoratorius; sternaulus shallow; propodeum usually strongly carinate,
but weakly carinate in several species; wing lacking areolet; nervulus opposite
basal vein except in anoicus; nervellus broken below middle except in 7mplanus;
2 or 3, exceptionally 4 or 5 hamuli on costellan fold; hind tibia slightly shorter
than thorax length; inner spur on hind tibia 0. 35-0. 6x length of hind basitarsus;
hind tibia usually lacking setae on external surface; hind tibia black and white
banded; abdomen rounded dorsally and tapered apically, only occasionally com-
pressed in the female; caudal margin of each tergum transverse or slightly
convex; petiole in dorsal view varying from almost quadrate to rectangular,
length 1.0-1.9x width, usually bearing a pair of dorsal carinae; second and
third segments wider than long; epipleura distinct on segments 2, 3, and occa-
sionally base of 4; spiracles dorsad of lateral sutures in terga; length of ab-
domen 0.95-1.4x combined lengths of hind femur and tibia; transverse impres-
sions nearly always present on all or several of segments 1-4.
Twelve species from the region are included in Diplazon. Of these, laeta-
torius is cosmopolitan, pectoratorius has a Holarctic distribution, orbitalis
and scutellaris occur in the Nearctic region, and 8 species are newly described
here. |
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Key to the Neotropic species of Diplazon
Females
(Females of pullatus and triangulus are unknown. )
MeSOpPlCUrUm MIATKeEC WIN PIOUS on a ee ak 2
MICS OOIGUT UIE reer es ee a ke Gk |
Hind tibia black at apex, white on remainder; hind basitarsus white on basal
half, black on apical half; petiole and propodeum weakly or not carinate;
transverse impressions weak or absent on abdominal segments 3-4.
11. pectoratorius Thunberg
Hind tibia black or rufous at base and apex, white on medial annulus; hind
basitarsus usually concolorous, dark brown or black, except in mulleolus;
petiole and propodeum usually strongly carinate; transverse impressions
weak or strong on abdominal segments 3-4.............. 3
Mesoscutum rufous; hind coxa and femur variously colored, but not rufous.
Hind coxa and femur mostly blackened; abdomen rounded above, gradually
narrowed apically; transverse impressions strong on abdominal segments
3 and 4; abdomen extensively punctate. 7. rufoscutatus, new species
Hind coxa cream; hind femur fuscous at base and apex, tawny medially;
abdomen strongly compressed from segment 5 to apex; transverse im-
pressions lacking on abdominal segments 3 and 4; abdomen shagreened
on basal segments and polished apically. 12. mulleolus, new species
Abdomen elongated and somewhat compressed; abdominal tergites with
weak transverse impressions, finely striate before the transverse im-
pressions; hind tibia rufous at base and apex; abdomen spotted with cream
at basal corners of segments 4-7 ...... 10. prolatus, new species
Abdomen not elongated, broadened at middle, then progressively narrowed
to apex; abdominal tergites 1-3 or 4 with deep transverse impressions,
coarsely striate or shagreened-punctate before the impressions; hind
tibia black at base and apex; abdomen spotted or banded on apical mar-
Sine OF LOveas rae Ao ee ee a A ee holy ae Ween 6
Abdominal tergites 2 and 3 shagreened-punctate before transverse impres-
StOUs; TiASeLIU TOUS re 5. scutellaris Cresson
Abdominal tergites 2 and 3 deeply striate before transverse impressions;
Tiaeellum black 92. es es 8 OSD IAnUS, New species
Transverse impressions of abdomen nearly lacking; dorsal carinae lacking
from petiole; hind coxa and femur largely blackened.
9. anolcus, new species
Transverse impressions of abdomen well developed; dorsal carinae strong
on petiole: hind coxa and femur rufous: . 2. oe eo ee a ee. 8
Abdominal terga shagreened and impunctate before transverse impressions;
mesoscutum very finely punctate; face shagreened and impunctate.
4. erugatus, new species
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 4)
Abdominal terga usually polished and punctate or somewhat rugulose before
- transverse impressions; mesoscutum coarsely punctate; face shagreened
i DICTA tars Fe ne ee ee a ae a ae ge 9
9. Abdominal terga 2-4 entirely or partially rufous; hind tibia tricolored, with
rufous at apex; mesosternal suture deep; orbital bar less than height of
eye; humeral bar not recurved ........ 1. laetatorius Fabricius
Abdominal terga black, spotted or banded with cream or rufous behind
transverse impressions; hind tibia bicolored, usually black at apex;
mesosternal suture shallow; orbital bar extending from top of eye into
malar space; humeral bar usually recurved. 2. orbitalis Cresson
Males
~ (Males of implanus and erugatus are unknown. )
1. Mesopleurum and often mesosternum largely rufous or cream-yellow. 2
Mesopleurum and mesosternum black, usually with a few yellow markings,
occasionally a narrow longitudinal stripe on mesopleurum ......
2. Hind tibia black at apex, white on remainder; hind basitarsus white on basal
half; petiole and propodeum weakly or not carinate; transverse impres-
sions weak or absent on abdominal segments 3-4.
11. pectoratorius Thunberg
Hind tibia black or rufous at base and apex, white on medial annulus; hind
basitarsus concolorous, dark brown or black, except in mulleolus;
petiole and propodeum usually carinate; transverse impressions weak or
strong on abdominal sempments S445 aii. wea ek ie ae Be 3
3. Meaedtubin rufous; hind coxa and femur variously colored, but not rufous.
4. Hind coxa and femur mostly blackened; abdomen heavily punctate; petiole
leoneth 22.25% Widths oy wee ie 7. rufoscutatus, new species
Hind coxa cream; hind femur fuscous at base and apex, tawny medially; ab-
domen shagreened, polished apically; petiole length 1. 6-1. 8x width.
12. mulleolus, new species ©
5. Abdominal terga 2 and 3 scabro-punctate before their transverse impres-
sions; face yellow; abdomen banded or spotted with yellow behind trans-
WETSCIMPVESELONS: Se a ce a 6. scutellaris Cresson
Abdominal terga 2 and 3 finely striate before their rather shallow trans-
verse impressions; face with wedge-shaped yellow orbital bars; abdomen
DIAC i Ge ae ek ies ee i es 10. prolatus, new species
6. Transverse impressions of abdomen nearly lacking; dorsal carinae lacking
from petiole; petiole length 1.9-2.0x width; propodeal carinae largely
PACKING ee et ee i 9. anolcus, new species
Transverse impressions of abdomen well developed; dorsal carinae strong
on petiole; petiole length 1.1-1.6x width; propodeal carinae usually well
COV GIOIIOG oi as i Gita ie Ry ee a i RE or BK COS 7
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
7. Hind coxa largely blackened; prepectus and mesopleurum black; transverse
impressions of abdomen usually shallow; upper tooth of mandible trun-
CAPO ed 8. pullatus, new species
Hind coxa rufous; prepectus cream or yellow, mesopleurum usually marked
with cream or yellow; transverse impressions of abdomen usually well
developed; upper tooth of mandible shallowly to deeply concave ... 8
8. Mesoscutum polished and nearly impunctate. 3. triangulus, new species
Mesoscutum polished and deeply punctate .............4... 9
9. Abdominal terga 2-4 entirely or partially rufous; hind tibia tricolored, with >
rufous at apex; mesosternal suture Pree, humeral bar not recurved.
1. laetatorius Fabricius
Abdominal terga black, spotted or banded with cream or rufous behind their
transverse impressions; hind tibia bicolored, usually black at apex; meso-
sternal suture shallow; humeral bar usually recurved. |
2. orbitalis Cresson
1. Diplazon laetatorius Fabricius
(Figures 1, 53, and 69)
Ichneumon laetatorius Fabricius, 1781. Spec. Insect. 1:424. [9]. Type: 9,
Germany (lost).
Ichneumon dichrous Schrank, 1781. Enum. Insect. Austr., p. 352. ‘‘o”’=9.
Type: 9, Austria (lost).
Ichneumon lituratorius Schrank, 1802. Fauna Boica 2:287. 9. Type: &,
Germany (lost).
Anomalon attractus Say, 1826. Boston Jour. Nat. Hist. 1:241. 9. Type: 9,
Indiana (destroyed). Neotype: ?, Dallas, Texas (Washington), designated
by Cushman and Gahan, 1921.
Bassus albovarius Wollaston, 1858. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. , ser. 3, 1:23. .¢'.
Type: o, Madeira (London?).
Bassus cinctipes Holmgren, 1868. Kongl. Sven. Fregat. Eugenies Resa 2: 409.
2. Type: 9, Cape of Good Hope (Stockholm ?).
Bassus neal Cresson, 1868. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 2:112. ©, 9.
Types: o, 9, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Illinois
(lost).
Bassus tripicticrus Walsh, 1873. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis 3:85. oc, &.
Types: o, 9, ?Illinois (destroyed).
Scolobates varipes Smith, 1878. Trans. Ent. Soc. London 1878:3. 9. Type:
2, New Zealand (London). |
Bassus venustulus Saussure, 1890. In Grandidier: Hist. Phys., Nat. Politique
- de Madagascar, 20 (Hyménoptéres), part 1, pl. 15, fig. 23. Type: 9,
Madagascar (Paris?).
Bassus laetatorius var. terminalis Davis, 1895. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 22:
19. 9. Type: ¢, Washington (Philadelphia).
Bassus balearicus Kriechbaumer, 1895. Ann. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat. 23: 246.
@. Type: 92, Mallorca Island (location of type unknown).
Bassus generosus Cameron, 1898. Mem. & Proc. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc.
42:31. 9. Type: 9, Greymouth, New Zealand (London).
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae T
Bassus laetatorius tkitt Cheesman, 1936. Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. London 85:
182. 2. Type: 9, New Hebrides Islands (London).
Biology: Cook, 1891. Ann. Rpt. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. 4:132. - Metcalf, 1913.
Ohio Biol. Surv. Vol. 1, Bul. 1:50. - Moore, 1913. Agr. Jour. South
Africa 6: 490, fig. 11. - Kelly, 1914. Jour. Econ. Ent. 7:294. - Houser,
Guyton, & Lowry, 1917. Bul. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. 317: 80. - Voukasso-
vitch, 1925. Bul. Soc. Ent. France 1925:171. - Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ.
Ent. 19: 724, 727. - Cushman, 1926. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 28:44. -
Heiss, 1938. Ill. Biol. Monog. 36, no. 1:19, 99, 100. - Scott, 1939. Ann.
Appl. Biol. 26:521, 522, 525; pl. 30, fig. 1. - Kamal, 1939. Tech. Scient.
Bul. Min. Agr. Egypt 207: 12-13, 26-31, 46-47, 50-51, 55; fig. 38-47, 92.
- Beirne, 1941. Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 7:159. - Weems, 1954. Ohio Jour.
Sci. 54:45-54. - Butler & Dasch, 1958. Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul.
135: 5-7.
Female: 4.2-6.7 mm.; head polished, lightly shagreened on face, deeply
punctate on face and frons, more finely on gena; OOC 1.4-1.5x HO; face width
1.9x height; clypeus width 1. 8-2.2x height, apical lobes weakly rounded with a
moderate median emargination, polished; malar space 0.4-0. 6x basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible strongly bidentate; 15-17 flagellar segments;
flagellum covered with short inclined hairs; thorax polished, deeply punctate
except on speculum; mesosternal suture broad and rather deep; pleural carina
strong; propodeum with strong dorsal, petiolar and lateral carinae, basal and
lateral areas polished and punctate, petiolar area bearing strong V-shaped ca-
rinae and dendritic carinulae; 2-3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs stout; coxae
and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen stout, rounded dorsally,
progressively narrowed from base of segment 4; petiole quadrate, length 1.0-
1.1x width, margins slightly divergent behind spiracles, polished and deeply
punctate, a pair of strong carinae arising at base, converging to middle, then
parallel to deep transverse impression at apical 0.25; transverse impression
crossed by numerous short longitudinal carinulae; segment 2 slightly wider
than long, a deep transverse impression at apical 0.3, deeply and closely punc-
tate before and more sparsely punctate behind impression; segment 3 with deep
transverse impression behind middle and on segment 4 at middle, both deeply
and closely punctate before and more smooth behind impression; rest of abdo-
men polished and obscurely punctate; epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3,
sharply inflexed.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, inner orbital bar; flagellum
rufous; yellow on humeral bar, tegula, scutellum, postscutellum, tip of prono-
tal lobe, spot under each wing; wings dusky; legs largely rufous; hind tibia black
at base, then successively white banded, black banded, and rufous banded at a-
pex; black on hind tarsus; fore coxa often somewhat dusky; rufous on all or part
of petiole, usually all of segments 2 and 3, and base or all of 4; rufous ventral-
ly on segments 1-3.
Male: 4.5-5.7 mm.; face width 2.0-2.1x height; 16-18 flagellar segments;
hairs on flagellum short "and inclined dorsally, erect ventrally; oo length
1.1-1.2x width; abdomen more pubescent than in female.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, inner or-
bit, scape and pedicel ventrally; rufous ventrally on flagellum: thorax as in fe-
male, but with yellow on most of proepisternum, prepectus, and a spot along
sternaulus; legs paler than in female, yellow on fore and middle coxae, all tro-
chanters, and anteriorly on fore femur and tibia; abdomen colored as in female,
rufous usually on segments 2-4.
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., Vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
D, laetatorius may be distinguished usually by the tricolored hind tibia, the
rufous coxae, the shiny and deeply punctate thorax and abdomen, the strong
transverse impressions of segments 1-4, the strongly carinate propodeum and
petiole, and the usually rufous median abdominal segments.
Specimens: 49, La Rioja, Argentina, E. Giacomelli (Ithaca). 29, Potreril-
los, Argentina (Ithaca). 9, Aconcagua, 5 miles north of Concon, Chile, Dec.
16, 1950, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco). 79, Angol, Chile, Dec. 31,
1950, and Jan. 1, 1951, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco). 9%, Angol, Chile,
Nov. 27, 1957, F. Ballejas (Dreisbach). 9, Bio Bio, 5 km. west of Tucapel,
Chile, Dec. 28, 1950, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco). 49, 20 km. north
of Concon, Valparaiso Province, Chile, Nov. 26, 1950, Ross & Michelbacher
(San Francisco). 92, La Balsa, 850 m., Cordillera Parral, Linares, Chile,
Feb. 25-27, 1956, L. Pena (Ottawa). 9, Los Maitenes, Santiago, Chile, Oct.
18, 1954, L. Pefia (Ottawa). 9, Mamina, Chile, Sept. 15, 1951, L. Pefia
(Ottawa). 9, Parca, Chile (Davis). 9, Aguascalientes, Mexico, June 26, 1952,
E. Gilbert & C. MacNeil (Albany, Calif.). 9, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico,
9,900 ft., March 3, 1959, H. & M. Evans and D. Anderson (Ithaca). 9, 10
miles north of Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, 5,000 ft., July 13, 1959, H.
Evans (Ithaca). 9, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 5,000 ft., July 13, 1959,
H. Evans (Ithaca). 9, Puebla, Mexico, July 3, 1952, E. Gilbert & C. MacNeil
(Albany, Calif.). 22, Arequipa, Peru (Washington). 49, Callao, Peru, Nov.
16 and 17, 1950, Michelbacher & Ross (San Francisco). 9, Chosica, Peru
(Ithaca).
D. laetatorius has a cosmopolitan distribution.
2. Diplazon orbitalis Cresson
(Figure 2)
Bassus orbttalis Cresson, 1865. Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila. 4:272. 9. Type: 9,
Colorado (Philadelphia). :
Bassus cinctulus Cresson, 1878. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1878:357. o.
Type: o", California (Philadelphia). :
Biology: Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19:725, 728. - Kamal, 1939. Tech.
Scient. Serv. Bul. Min. of Agr. Egypt 207: 31, 46-47; fig. 48-53, 94. -
Butler & Dasch, 1958. Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 135: 6-7.
Female: 6.4-7.8 mm.; head shagreened on face, more polished on frons,
vertex and gena, all finely punctate; OOC 1.0-1.5x HO; clypeus width 1. 8-2. 2x
height, the apical lobes weakly rounded with a moderate median emargination,
polished; malar space 0.5x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible
deeply bidentate; 16-17 flagellar segments; thorax polished, deeply and close-
ly punctate, less so on speculum; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina
low; propodeum with strong dorsal, petiolar, and lateral carinae, basal
area polished and punctate, lateral area more rugulose, petiolar area rugu-
lose but more polished ventrally; 3-4 hamuli on costellan fold; coxae and fe-
mora polished and obscurely punctate; numerous setae on external face of hind
tibia; abdomen stout, rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed from base
of segment 4 to apex of abdomen; petiole quadrate, length 1.1-1.3x width, mar-
gins slightly divergent behind spiracles, rugulose, a pair of strong carinae
arising at base, converging to deep transverse impression at apical 0.2; seg-
ment 2 distinctly wider than long, a deep transverse impression at apical 0. 3,
polished, deeply and closely punctate before impression, less so behind; seg-
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 9
ment 3 with deep impression behind middle, sculptured like 2; segment 4 with
distinct impression at middle, deeply punctate before, impunctate behind; re-
mainder of abdomen polished and obscurely punctate; epipleura distinct on seg-
ments 2, 3, and base of 4, sharply inflexed.
Black. Cream-yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, inner orbit extending
onto vertex and malar space, often a median facial spot, humeral bar often re-
curved onto mesoscutum for 0.6+ of its length, tegula, scutellum, postscutel-
lum, tip of proepisternum, prepectus, tip of pronotal lobe, spot below ster-
naulus, mesepimeron, subtegular ridge; legs largely rufous, cream-yellow on
fore coxa, apically on middle coxa, fore and middle trochanters, anteriorly on
fore femur and tibia; white medial band on hind tibia, black at base and apex
and on hind tarsus; cream behind transverse impressions of segments 1-3,
sometimes 4, and basal corners of 4 and 5.
The coloring is exceedingly variable. Some of the patterns that occur in-
clude: orbital bar reduced; prepectus yellow ventrally; recurved humeral bar
interrupted or lacking; rufous or black behind transverse impressions on terga,
and white spotted on posterior corners of segments 2-4; face in part or com-
pletely cream-yellow.
Male: 5.0-6.4 mm.; face width 1. 8-1.9x height; clypeus width 2. 2-2. 3x
height; 16-18 flagellar segments; flagellum covered with a short pile; petiole
length 1.4-1.5x width.
Black. Similar to female but yellow on all of face, scape and pedicel ven-
trally, and more of mesosternum; legs paler, with cream on all of fore and
middle coxae, apex of hind coxa, and all trochanters; rufous behind transverse
impressions of segments 2-4 and apical margins of 5-7; yellow spotted at basal
corners of segments 4 and 5, apically on petiole and posterior corners of 2-4.
The male is also quite variable. Specimens often lack the recurved portion
of the humeral bar; the paler abdominal markings may be reduced; the rufous
of the abdomen sometimes covers all of segments 3 and 4; and occasional speci-
mens are cream banded behind the transverse impressions of segments 1-4.
Specimens: 92, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, at 5,500 ft., May 25, 1959,
H. Evans (Ithaca). 110, Distrito Federal, Mexico, Oct. 11, 1962, H. & M.
Townes (Townes). o, 15-20 miles west of Jiquilpan, Jalisco, Mexico, Nov.
30, 1948, H. Leech (San Francisco). 49, Michoacan between San Juan Par.
and Zirosto, Mexico, June 23, 1947, T. Hubbell (Ann Arbor). 9, Nombre de
Dios, Durango, Mexico, July 13, 1954, E. Schlinger (Albany, Calif.). 9, near
Puebla, Mexico, Oct. 15, 1962, H. Townes (Townes). o, Rio Frio, 55.5 km.
west of Mexico City, Mexico, Oct. 24, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). 3,
San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, at 7,500 ft., April 29, 1959, H.
Evans (Ithaca). 39, 40’, San Pedro Iturbide, 32+ km. west of Linares, Mexico,
Oct. 5, 6, and 26, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). co, Tuxpan, Mexico, at
6,000 ft., July 6, 1959, H. Evans (Ithaca). 9, Zimapan, Hidalgo, Mexico,
June 11-14, 1951, P. Hurd (Albany, Calif.). |
Diplazon orbitalis occurs in Mexico, and in the Canadian and Upper Austral
zones of the Nearctic region, west of 100° W. longitude.
10 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
3. Diplazon triangulus, new species
(Figure 3)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 4.6 mm. (3.8 mm.); head polished, lightly shagreened on face and
malar space, obscurely punctate on face and gena; gena not inflated; vertex
strongly impressed medially; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.5x HO;
face width 2.1x (1.9x) height, parallel margined; clypeus width 2.1x (2. 0x)
height, apical lobes rounded with a shallow median emargination, slightly up-
curved at apical margin, polished; malar space 0.5x (0. 6x) basal width of man-
dible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly concave; 17 (16) flagellar segments;
thorax polished and obscurely punctate except on speculum; prepectal carina
complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina low; propodeum bearing
moderately developed dorsal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, weakly roughened
on basal area, and with carinulae on petiolar area; 4 hamuli on costellan fold;
legs slender; coxae and femora polished; abdomen rounded dorsally, slightly
narrowed apically; petiole short rectangular, length 1.5x (1.4x) width, margins
slightly convergent behind spiracles, a pair of weak carinae arising at base and
fading out near middle, a weak transverse impression at apical 0.2, polished
between and coarsely punctate laterad of longitudinal carinae; segment 2 slight-
ly wider than long, a deep impression at apical 0.3, thyridia large and polished,
coarsely pitted before impression and polished behind; segment 3 with deep im-
pression at apical 0.4, sculptured as in segment 2; segment 4 with a moderate
impression near middle, sculptured as in segment 2; remainder of abdomen
mostly polished; pubescence abundant on abdomen; epipleura distinct on seg-
ments 2 and 3, inflexed.
Black. Cream-yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower 0.2 of gena,
clypeus, mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, 2 elonga-
ted spots on mesoscutum, scutellum, postscutellum, most of proepisternum,
tip of pronotal lobe, prepectus, anterior mesosternum, longitudinal triangular
area on lower mesopleurum (enclosing a black central spot), subtegular ridge,
mesepimeron; legs mostly rufous; cream on fore and middle coxae, all tro-
chanters, anteriorly on fore and middle femora and tibiae; white annulus on
central 0.4+ of hind tibia; dusky rufous at base and apex of hind tibia, all of
hind tarsus; cream-yellow apical spots on segments 2-5, and apical margins of
segments 6 and 7. The face may have 2 black bands from clypeus to antennal
fossae; the yellow on the middle of the mesoscutum may be lacking and the scu-
tellum yellow only at the apex; and the yellow of the mesopleurum may be limi-
ted to a longitudinal stripe.
This species differs from orbitalis by its smaller size, the largely polished
mesoscutum and mesopleurum, and the coloration of the abdomen. It differs
from evugatus in the punctation of the abdominal segments and the color of the
hind tibia and tarsus.
Type: o, 15-20 miles west of Jiquilpan, Jalisco, Mexico, Nov. 30, 1948,
H. B. Leech (San Francisco).
Paratypes: o, same data as type (San Francisco). o, San Cristobal de las
Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, at 7,500 ft., May 2, 1959, H. Evans (Ithaca).
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae oot
4. Diplazon erugatus, new species
(Figure 4)
Female: 4.3 mm. (5.2 mm.); head shagreened, more polished on frons
and vertex, obscurely punctate on gena; gena not inflated; vertex shallowly im-
pressed medially; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face width
2.1x (2. 0x) height, slightly narrowed ventrally; clypeus width 2.1x height, api-
cal lobes angularly rounded with a moderate median emargination, slightly up-
curved at apical margin, polished; malar space 0. 6x (0. 7x) basal width of man-
dible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly concave; 17 (16) flagellar segments;
thorax polished, obscurely punctate except on speculum; notaulus deep on basal
0.25 of mesoscutum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina low; propodeum bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar
carinae, basal area weakly wrinkled, petiolar area polished with a few weak
median carinulae; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender, coxae polished,
femora lightly shagreened, obscurely punctate; abdomen rounded dorsally,
gradually compressed from base of segment 4 to apex of abdomen; petiole quad-
rate, length 1.1x width, margins weakly divergent behind spiracles, a pair of
weak carinae arising at basal corners, convergent to middle and then become
obsolete, a deep transverse impression at apical 0.25, a series of longitudinal
carinulae in impression, shagreened-rugulose before impression and polished
behind; segment 2 wider than long, shagreened before transverse impression at
apical 0.3, polished behind; segment 3 with an impression at apical 0.4, sculp-
tured as in 3; segment 4 with an impression near middle, shagreened before
impression; remainder of abdomen polished; epipleura distinct on segments 2,
3, and base of 4, inflexed.
Black. Cream on inner orbit, malar space, middle of face (or this lacking),
clypeus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, tegula, scutellum (or apex), postscutel-
lum, base of wings, tip of pronotal lobe, tip of proepisternum, subtegular ridge,
mesepimeron; legs largely rufous; cream on fore and middle coxae and all tro-
chanters; white annulus on middle 0. 4+ of hind tibia; fuscous at base and apex
of hind tibia and on hind tarsus; cream spots at basal corners of abdominal seg-
ment 4, apical corners of segments 2 and 3, and spiracles on segments 1-3.
The cream on the abdominal spiracles and apical corners may be reduced or
lacking.
Male: Unknown.
This species may be distinguished by the extensively polished thorax and
the even shagreening of the anterior abdominal segments. It is most closely
related to tviangulus. |
Type: 9, San Pedro Iturbide, 32+ km. west of Linares, Nuevo Leon,
Mexico, Oct. 26, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
Paratypes: 39, San Pedro Iturbide, 32+ km. west of Linares, ee Leon,
Mexico, Oct. 5 and 6, 1962, H. & M. Downes (Townes). 92, San Cristobal, 6
miles southeast of Chiapas, Mexico, March 31, 1953, R. Bechtel and E.
Schlinger (Albany, Calif. ).
5. Diplazon scutellaris Cresson
(Figure 5)
Bassus scutellavis Cresson, 1868. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 2:112. 9. Type:
2, Illinois (Philadelphia).
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Female: 6.3-7.0 mm.; head shagreened on face and malar space, polished
on frons and gena, all finely punctate; OOC 1.0-1.1x HO; face width 1. 7-1. 8x
height, parallel margined; clypeus width 1. 75-2. 2x height, apical lobes trun-
cate, meeting each other at a slight angle medially, lightly shagreened; malar
space 0.3-0.4x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly bi-
dentate; 15-17 flagellar segments; sense cones abundant, closer together than
the width of a cone, conspicuous; thorax polished, deeply and closely punctate
on mesoscutum, more obscurely punctate on rest of pleura and sternum,
smooth on speculum; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina low; propode- |
um bearing strong dorsal, petiolar, and lateral carinae, basal areas polished
and finely punctate, petiolar area covered with dendritic carinulae arising on
median line; 2-4 hamuli on costellan fold; legs stout; coxae and femora polished
and obscurely punctate; abdomen broad, rounded dorsally, progressively nar-
rowed from base of segment 3; petiole quadrate, length 1.1-1.2x width, mar-
gins slightly divergent behind spiracles, rugulose, a pair of strong submedian
carinae arising at base and converging to a deep transverse impression at api-
cal 0.2; segment 2 distinctly wider than long, a deep impression at apical 0. 3,
scabro-rugulose before impression, polished behind; segment 3 with impres-
sion behind middle, sculptured as in segment 2; segment 4 with distinct im-
pression at middle, polished and finely punctate before, polished behind; ahs
of abdomen polished; epipleura distinct on segments 2, 3, and base of 4,
flexed.
Black. Cream on clypeus, mandible, palpi, inner orbital bar, and median
facial spot; rufous on flagellum; cream on humeral bar, tegula, scutellum,
postscutellum, tip of pronotal lobe, spot under each wing, usually 2 submedian
spots on mesoscutum; rufous on lower 0.64 of mesopleurum, prepectus, meso-
sternum, metapleurum, and propodeum laterad of spiracle; legs largely rufous,
more cream on fore coxa and trochanters, and apices of fore and middle femo-
ra; white median band on hind tibia; black at apex of hind femur, base and apex
of hind tibia, and hind tarsus; cream medially on apical margin of petiole; spots
at apical corners of ail 2 and 3 and apical margins of all segments.
Male: 5.0-6.1 mm.; OOC 0. 8-1.0x HO; face width 1. 6-1. 9x height; cly-
peus width 2. 1x height; 16- 18 flagellar segments; flagellum covered with short
erect hairs ventrally, inclined dorsally; petiole length 1. 3-1. 5x width.
Black. Cream on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, inner or-
_ bit, scape and pedicel ventrally; tawny ventrally on flagellum; thorax much as
in female, but also with cream on proepisternum, prepectus, anteriorly on
mesosternum, and along sternaulus; legs paler than in female, cream on fore
and middle coxae, all trochanters, anteriorly on fore and middle femora and
tibiae; cream at apex of petiole, apical corners of segments 2-4, basal cor-
ners of 4 and 5, and apical margins of 2-7.
Specimen: Q, 4 miles east of Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, at 6, 000 ft. ,
June 6, 1959, H. Evans (Ithaca).
This species also occurs in the Canadian, Transition, Upper Austral and
Lower Austral zones of the Nearctic region.
6. Diplazon implanus, new species
(Figure 6)
Female: 7.2 mm.; head polished, lightly shagreened on face and malar
Space, coarsely punctate on face, more obscurely punctate on remainder of
head; gena not inflated; vertex not impressed medially; occipital carina rounded
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 13
medially; OOC 1.2x HO; face width 1. 7x height, slightly narrowed ventrally;
clypeus width 1.9x height, apical lobes angularly rounded with a moderate me-
dian emargination, slightly upcurved at apical margin, and lightly shagreened;
malar space 0.5x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible weakly con-
cave; 17 flagellar segments; thorax polished, closely and deeply punctate on
mesoscutum, obscurely on rest of thorax, polished on speculum; prepectal
carina complete; pleural carina weak; mesosternal suture shallow; propodeum
bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, polished and obscurely
punctate on basal area, strong median carinulae on petiolar area from which
arching carinulae pass to petiolar carinae; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; nervellus
broken at middle; legs moderately thickened; coxae and femora polished and ob-
scurely punctate; abdomen robust, rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed
from base of segment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole quadrate, length 1. 2x width,
lateral margins divergent behind spiracles, posterior margin conspicuously
rounded medially, a pair of strong carinae arising at basal corners, convergent
to near middle of segment, then parallel to deep transverse impression at api-
cal 0.25, transverse impression arcuate, crossed by many strong longitudinal
carinulae; petiole mostly polished between carinae, more rugulose laterad of
carinae, a strong lateral carina above spiracle and a weaker sublateral carina
below spiracle; segment 2 wider than long, a deep transverse impression at
apical 0.25, a strong lateral carina above spiracle, basal margin deeply im-
pressed except at middle, coarsely longitudinally striate to impression, pol-
ished and coarsely punctate behind; segment 3 with deep transverse impression
at apical 0.4, a lateral carina from base‘to spiracle, surface sculptured as in
segment 2; segment 4 with a rather deep impression at apical 0.4, striate-rugu-
lose before impression; remainder of abdomen polished, pubescence short and
sparse; epipleura distinct on segments 2, 3, and 4, inflexed.
Black. Cream on wide orbital bar, clypeus, mandible, palpi except for 2
apical segments which are more fuscous; cream on recurved humeral bar inter-
rupted in middle of mesoscutum, tegula, scutellum, postscutellum, tip of pro-
notal lobe, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, dorsal spot on prepectus; rufous
on lower 0. 7+ of mesopleurum, most of prepectus, mesosternum, and meta-
pleurum; legs largely rufous; cream on fore coxa and trochanters, anterior
stripe on fore femur and fore and middle tibiae; white annulus on central 0.4 of
hind tibia; fuscous at apex of hind femur, base and apex of hind tibia, and all
tarsi; wings somewhat dusky; cream at apical margin of petiole and abdominal
segments 4-7, posterior corners of segments 2-4.
Male: Unknown.
This species is characterized by the coarse striations of abdominal seg-
ments 2-4 and the rufous coloring of the thorax. It is most closely related to
D. scutellaris. !
Type: ¢, San Pedro Iturbide, 32+ km. west of Linares, Nuevo Leon,
Mexico, Oct. 6, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
7. Diplazon rufoscutatus, new species
(Figure 7)
Female: 6.1 mm. (3.7-5.8 mm.); head shagreened and abundantly punc-
tate on face, more polished on rest of head, all heavily punctate; gena not in-
flated; vertex deeply impressed medially; occipital carina rounded medially;
OOC 1. 4x (1. 3x) HO; face width 1. 7x (1. 9x) height, parallel margined; clypeus
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
width 1. 7x (1. 8x) height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emargi-
nation, slightly upcurved at apical margin, lightly shagreened; malar space
0. 7x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly concave; 17
(18) flagellar segments; thorax polished, deeply and closely punctate, except
on speculum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural
carina low; propodeum with moderately developed dorsal carinae, weakly
developed lateral and petiolar carinae, polished and punctate on basal area,
more scabrous on petiolar area; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender, pol-
ished and obscurely punctate on coxae and femora; abdomen rounded dorsally,
progressively narrowed apically; petiole quadrate, length 1.0x width, a pair of
low carinae arising at base, converging to middle and then fading out, a deep
transverse impression at apical 0.25, punctate and scabrous; segment 2 much
- wider than long, a deep impression at apical 0.3, densely punctate; segment 3
with deep impression at apical 0.4, deeply and closely punctate; segments 4
and 5 with deep impressions near middle, deeply and abundantly punctate be-
fore, more sparsely behind impressions; abdomen covered with an abundant
short pubescence; epipleura distinct on abdominal segments 2 and 3, inflexed.
Black. Cream on orbital bar that touches clypeus, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, axillary sclerites; rufous on mesoscutum, tegula, scutellum, postscutellum,
most of pronotal lobe, upper 0.8 of mesopleurum, and prepectus; black on base
of fore coxa, basal half of middle and all of hind coxa, posterior stripe on fore
femur and tibia, middle femur except apex, middle tibia except anteriorly,
middle tarsus, hind femur, base and apex of hind tibia, and hind tarsus; cream
on remainder of legs, more tawny rufous on fore tarsus.
Male: 5.1-6.1 mm.; petiole length 1. 25x width.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; thorax and legs as in female, but
with cream on tip of proepisternum, and most of fore and middle coxae.
This species is readily recognized by the rufous color of the thorax, the
black and white markings of the legs, the weak carinae of the propodeum, the
deep transverse impressions of abdominal segments 1-5, and the sculpturing
of the abdomen. :
Type: 2, Cordillera de Lonquimay, Lago Galletue, Chile, Jan. 9-12, 1962,
L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 9, Chiloe Island, Dalcahue, Chile, Jan. 17-Feb. 14, 1962, L.
Pena (Townes). o, Banos de Cauquenes, Chile, 1907, P. Herbst (Cambridge).
o, 9, Liucura, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 1-9, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa).
8. Diplazon pullatus, new species
(Figure 8)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 5.5 mm. (4.6 mm.); head shagreened on face, polished and finely
punctate onfrons, gena, and vertex; gena not inflated; vertex strongly im-
pressed medially; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.1x (1. 0x) HO;
face width 2. 1x (1. 9x) height, parallel margined; clypeus width 2.1x height,
apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emargination, slightly upcurved
at apical margin, weakly shagreened; malar space 0. 6x (0. 4x) basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible truncate; 17 (16) flagellar segments; thorax
polished, deeply and moderately punctate on mesoscutum, more finely on an-
terior and lower mesopleurum and mesosternum; prepectal carina complete;
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 15
mesosternal suture shallow; sternaulus broad and shallow; pleural carina very
weak; propodeum with moderately developed dorsal, lateral, and petiolar ca-
rinae, polished with shallow punctures on basal area and dendritic carinulae
on petiolar area; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora
polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen slender, progressively narrowed
apically; petiole short rectangular, length 1. 6x width, a pair of polished sub-
median dorsal carinae extending to weak transverse impression at apical 0. 2,
scabrous; segment 2 slightly wider than long, a weak impression at apical 0. 25,
shagreened and weakly scabrous before, more polished and weakly punctate be-
hind impression; segment 3 with weak impression near middle, sculptured as
in 2; segment 4 with very obscure impression near middle, sculptured as in 2;
rest of abdomen polished and obscurely punctate; abundant short pubescence on
abdomen; epipleura distinct on abdominal segments 2, 3, and basal 0.3 of 4,
inflexed; spiracle dorsad of suture on 2 and 3, posterior to end of suture on 4.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tips of scutellum and
postscutellum, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, upper half of mesepi-
meron; black at extreme bases of fore and middle coxae, basal 0. 6+ of hind
coxa, last tarsal segments of fore and middle legs, apex of hind femur, base
and apex of hind tibia, all of hind tarsus; yellow on rest of coxae, trochanters,
anteriorly on fore and middle femora and tibiae, narrow subbasal annulus on
middle tibia; white annulus on medial 0.45 (0.4) of hind tibia; rufous on rest of
legs; more dusky on middle tibia; yellow at basal corners of abdominal seg-
ments 4 and 5, orange-yellow at apical corners of segments 3 and 4, yellow
apical margin on segments 2-7.
This species is recognizable by the blackened hind coxa, weak transverse
impressions on the abdomen, the puncturing of the thorax, the scabrous abdo-
men, and the truncate upper tooth of the mandible.
Type: o, Hidalgo National Park, State of Mexico, Mexico, at 3,000 m.,
Oct. 12, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
Paratype: o, same data as type (Townes).
9. Diplazon anolcus, new species
(Figure 9)
Female: 4.4 mm.; head shagreened, more polished on frons and gena,
obscurely punctate on gena and vertex; gena weakly inflated; vertex strongly
impressed medially; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face
width 1. 8x height, parallel margined; clypeus width 2.2x height, apical lobes
angulate with a moderate median emargination, slightly upcurved at apical
margin, shagreened; malar space 0.5x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of
mandible shallowly concave; 17 flagellar segments; thorax polished, obscurely
punctate, lightly shagreened low on pronotum, proepisternum, and low on meta-
pleurum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture moderately deep; pleu-
ral carina strong; propodeum with partial transverse carina between basal and
petiolar areas, mostly shagreened; nervulus slightly basad of basal vein; 2
hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae polished, femora lightly sha-
greened and obscurely punctate; abdomen slender, rounded dorsally, progres-
sively narrowed from base of segment 4 to apex; petiole slender rectangular,
length 1. 7x width, shagreened, dorsal carinae and transverse impression
lacking; segment 2 slightly wider than long, shagreened, more polished near
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
apex, a faint transverse impression at apical 0.3; segment 3 shagreened on
basal 0.54; remainder of abdomen polished, covered with a short light pubes-
cence; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3, inflexed.
Black. Yellow on narrow inner orbital bar, clypeus, mandible, palpi,
humeral bar, scutellum, postscutellum, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular
ridge, upper end of mesepimeron, wing bases, fore and middle coxae, apical
0.54 of hind coxa, trochanters, anteriorly on fore and middle femora and tibiae,
and apex of hind femur; black on basal 0.5+ of hind coxa, hind femur except at
apex, base and apex of hind tibia, hind tarsus, posterior stripe on fore and
middle femora and tibiae; narrow white annulus on medial 0. 2+ of hind tibia;
most of remainder of fore and middle legs tawny rufous; yellow spots at basal
corners of abdominal segments 3-5 and posterior corners of segments 4-6.
Male: 4.2-4.4 mm.; face width 2.0-2.1x height; malar space 0. 7x basal
width of mandible; 17 flagellar segments; OOC 1.3-1.4x HO; petiole length 1.9-
2.0x width; abdomen more pubescent than in female; transverse carina of pro-
podeum lacking; transverse impressions of abdominal segments 2 and 3 almost
completely lacking.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, pedicel ventrally; thorax and legs colored as in female; yellow at apical
corners of abdominal segments 2, 3, and 4, and basal corners of segments 3
and 4.
This species is recognizable by the general lack of transverse impressions
and the even shagreening on the abdomen, the lack of carinae on the propodeum
and petiole, and the color of the legs and abdomen.
Type: 2, west slope of Popocatepetl, Mexico, at 10,000 ft., June 22, 1959,
H. Evans (Ithaca). :
Paratypes: 30°, 23 miles south of Toluca, Mexico, at 7,700 ft., Aug. 9,
1954, J. Chillcott (Ottawa).
10. Diplazon prolatus, new species
(Figure 10) |
Female: 6.7 mm. (7.1 mm.); head shiny shagreened, obscurely punctate
on vertex and gena; gena slightly inflated; vertex shallowly impressed medially;
occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.1x HO; face width 1. 6x (1. 7x) height,
slightly narrowed ventrally; clypeus width 1. 7x (1. 9x) height, apical lobes angu-
late with a moderate median emargination, slightly upcurved at apical margin,
polished; malar space 0.5x (0. 4x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth of man-
dible oblique and weakly concave; 17 flagellar segments; thorax polished, finely
punctate on mesoscutum and pronotum; prepectal carina complete; pleural ca-
rina low; mesosternal suture shallow; propodeum bearing well developed dorsal,
lateral, and petiolar carinae, median vertical carinulae on petiolar area, re-
mainder polished; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora
polished, obscurely punctate on femora; abdomen slender and elongate, strong-
ly narrowed from base of segment 4, strongly compressed from segment 5 to
apex; petiole short rectangular, length 1. 5x (1. 6x) width, margins parallel be-
hind spiracles, weak carinae arising at basal corners, converging to near mid-
dle and then fading out, longitudinally finely striate, a weak transverse impres-
sion at apical 0.2; segment 2 slightly longer than wide, striate to strong trans-
verse impression at apical 0.3, polished behind impression; segment 3 striate
on basal 0.6 to shallow transverse impression; polished behind impression and
over remainder of abdomen; hairs on abdomen short and sparse.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae Oe
Black. Cream on short narrow inner orbital bar or the bar sometimes
reaching the clypeus, clypeus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, tegula, bases of
wings, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, posterior spot on
scutellum, postscutellum; rufous on most of mesopleurum, small spot on pro-
notal lobe, metapleurum, ’ propodeum; legs largely rufous; cream on fore and
middle coxae and trochanters; white median annulus on hind tibia; more dusky
on base and apex of hind tibia, and on middle and hind tarsi; small cream spot
at basal corner of each of segments 4-6; rufous on lateral margin of petiole,
around spiracles of segments 2 and 3, and apical edges of segments 2-4,
Male: 5.2 mm.; face width 1. 85x height; OOC 1.0x HO; abdomen more
abundantly pubescent than in female.
Colored much as in female, but with wider inner orbital bar reaching to
clypeus; rufous of thorax more limited on mesopleurum and largely lacking
from propodeum; abdomen lacking rufous markings.
This species is distinguishable through the elongated abdomen, the stria-
tions of the first three abdominal segments, and the rufous markings of the
thorax. |
Type: 9, 185.5 km., Tuxtepec-Oaxaca Rd., Oaxaca, Mexico, at 2,200 m.,
Oct. 22, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
Paratypes: o’, 9, Jalapa, Veracruz, Mexico, Sept. 28-Oct. 3, 1961, R. &
K. Dreisbach (Dreisbach). |
11. Diplazon pectoratorius Thunberg
(Figure 11)
Ichneumon pectoratorius Thunberg, 1822. Mém. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg
8:280. of. Type: o, Sweden (Uppsala).
Ichneumon angustorius Thunberg, 1822. Mém. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg 8:
280. 9. Type: 92, Sweden (Uppsala).
Bassus pectoratorius Gravenhorst, 1829. Ichneum. Europeae 3: Sou OS,
Types: o', 2, Germany (lost). Name preoccupied by Thunberg, 1822.
Bassus pulchripes Provancher, 1875. Nat. Canad. 7:143, 144. ‘‘o'’’=9.
Lectotype: 9, Quebec (Quebec).
Polysphincta pleuralis Provancher, 1875. Nat. Canad. 7:312. ‘‘o"’=9.
Type: 9, Quebec (Quebec).
Homocidus akaashii Uchida, 1931. Bul. Forest Exp. Stat. Gov. Gen. Chosen
12:24, 50. o. Type: 0, Kankio-hokudo, Korea (Sapporo).
Bassus urupensis Uchida, 1935. Insecta Mats. 9:118. o, 2. Type: g,
Tokotan, Kuriles (Sapporo).
Female: 7.3-9.4 mm.; head shagreened on face and malar space, more
polished on frons and gena, all finely punctate; OOC 1.4-1. 6x HO; face width
1. 8-1.9x height, parallel margined; clypeus width 2.1-2.2x height, apical lobes
angularly rounded with a moderate median emargination, lightly shagreened;
malar space 0. 35-0. 5x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible shallow -
ly bidentate; 17-19 flagellar segments, first segment length 4.0-4. 2x width;
flagellum covered with short inclined hairs; thorax polished, finely punctate ex-
cept posteriorly on mesopleurum; notaulus deep on basal 0.25 of mesoscutum;
mesosternal suture shallow; prepectal carina lacking ventrally; pleural carina
partially obsolete; propodeum usually lacking carinae, or weak petiolar carinae
present, basal and lateral areas polished and finely punctate, petiolar area
covered with vertical arcuate carinulae; 3-4 hamuli on costellan fold; legs
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; numerous setae on
external face of hind tibia; abdomen rather slender, rounded dorsally, progres-
sively narrowed from base of segment 4; petiole quadrate, length 1.0-1. 2x
width, margins slightly divergent behind spiracles, rugulose, a pair of indis-
tinct carinae arising at base, converging to middle, then parallel to a deep
transverse impression at apical 0.2; segment 2 slightly wider than long, usual-
ly a rather deep impression at apical 0.3, scabrous before impression, pol-
ished and punctate behind; segment 3 with indistinct impression behind middle,
sculptured as in 2; rest of abdomen polished or lightly shagreened, abundantly
but obscurely punctate: numerous short hairs distributed over surface; epipleu-
ra distinct on segments 2 and 3, inflexed.
Black. Cream on clypeus, mandible, palpi, and inner orbital bar; flagellum
occasionally tawny ventrally; cream on large humeral bar, tegula, apices of
scutellum and postscutellum, capillary lines between wings, tip of pronotal
lobe, and spot under each wing; rufous on prepectus, mesopleurum, mesoster-
num, usually metapleurum, scutellum, and more or less of mesoscutum; legs
rufous on middle and hind coxae and femora; tawny on fore coxa and femur;
white on all trochanters, fore and middle tibiae, fore tarsus, two basal seg-
ments of middle tarsus, apex of hind femur, hind tibia except apex, and basal
Q.5+ of hind basitarsus; black at apex of hind tibia, apex of hind basitarsus and
rest of hind tarsus, and a ee three segments of middle tarsus.
Male: 17.1-7. 4 mm.; OOC 1.1-1.4x HO; face width 2.0x height; clypeus
width 1. 8-2. 1x height; 18- 21 flagellar segments; flagellum covered with short
erect hairs ventrally, inclined dorsally; petiole length 1.3-1.6x width.
Black. Pale yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, inner
orbit, antenna ventrally; thorax marked as in female, but with cream on pro-
episternum, more of pronotal lobe, prepectus, longitudinal stripe on meso-
pleurum, mesepimeron, laterally on scutellum; legs mostly as in female but
with middle coxa cream. } .
This species may be recognized by the color of the hind tibia and tarsus,
the absence of the prepectal carina ventrally, the weak propodeal carinae, the
transverse impressions weak or absent on abdominal segments 3 and 4, the ab-
domen usually scabrous and black dorsally, and the mesoscutum frequently
marked with rufous.
Specimens: o', 2, Hidalgo National Park, State of Mexico, Mexico, at
3,000 m., Oct. 12, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). )
This species occurs also in Eurasia and in the Hudsonian and Transition
zones of the Nearctic region.
12. Diplazon mulleolus, new species
(Figure 12)
Female: 6.3 mm. (6.4 mm.); head shiny shagreened, more polished on
frons, vertex, and gena; gena not inflated; vertex shallowly impressed medial-
ly; occipital carina narrowly rounded medially; OOC 0. 8x (0.'7x) HO; face
width 1. 8x height, slightly narrowed ventrally; clypeus width 2.3x height, api-
cal lobes angularly rounded with a shallow median emargination, slightly up-
curved at apical margin, weakly shagreened; malar space 0. 6x basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible subtruncate; 16 flagellar segments; thorax
polished, finely punctate except on speculum and metapleurum; notaulus deep
on basal 0.2 of mesoscutum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964 19
shallow; pleural carina low; propodeum bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and
petiolar carinae, basal area polished, petiolar area broad and shagreened; 3
(2) hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender, coxae polished, femora obscurely
punctate; abdomen rather elongated, rounded dorsally, compressed from mid-
dle of segment 3, strongly compressed from segment 5 to apex of abdomen;
petiole short rectangular, length 1.3x width, margins divergent behind spira-
cles, a pair of moderately strong carinae arising at basal corners, convergent
to middle and then becoming obsolete, a deep transverse impression at apical
0.25, a series of longitudinal carinae in impression, shagreened medially and
more rugulose laterally; segment 2 wider than long, shagreened before deep
transverse impression at apical 0.3, polished behind; segment 3 lightly sha-
greened on basal 0.3; remainder of abdomen polished; epipleura distinct on
segment 2 and basal 0.7 of 3, inflexed.
Rufous. Cream on narrow inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible,
palpi, and pedicel ventrally; black on rest of head and antenna; yellow on hu-
meral bar, scutellum, postscutellum, proepisternum, tip of pronotal lobe,
ventral edge and posterior tip of pronotal lobe, ventrally on prepectus, tegula,
subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, spot on lower mesopleurum; legs cream on
coxae and trochanters; tawny on femora and fore and middle tibiae and tarsi;
fuscous on posterior stripes on fore and middle femora, dorsal stripes on fore
and middle tibiae, basal and apical rings on hind femur and tibia, and all of
hind tarsus; white median annulus on hind tibia and basal 0.3 of hind basitarsus;
small cream spots at apical corners of abdominal segments 2, 3, and 4, and
basal corners of segments 4-7; abdomen dusky rufous.
Male: 5.1-5.3 mm.; clypeus width 2.15-2.3x height; malar space 0.6- |
0. 7x basal width of mandible; OOC 0.9-1.0x HO; 17 flagellar segments; petiole
length 1. 6-1. 8x width; abdomen gradually tapered apically; transverse impres-
sion weakly indicated on segment 3.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, scutellum, postscutel-
lum, most of pronotum, proepisternum, subtegular ridge, prepectus, lower
0.5 of mesopleurum, and mesepimeron; rufous on mesoscutum except anterior-
ly, rest of mesopleurum, mesosternum, and metapleurum; legs as in female;
abdomen dusky rufous; yellow spots at apical corners of segments 2 and 3,
basal corners of sezments 2-6.
This species is distinguishable by the extensive rufous coloration of the
thorax and abdomen, the coloration of the legs, the elongation and compres-
sion of the female abdomen, and the short distance from the hind ocellus to
the occipital carina.
Type: 9, Nova Teutonia, 279 11’ S., 52° 23’ W., Brazil, at 300-500 m..,
Aug. 12, 1948, F. Plaumann (Ottawa).
Paratypes: 30°, 29, same locality as type, Aug. 9, 10, and 12, 1948,
F. Plaumann (Ottawa).
2. Genus HOMOTROPUS
(Figure 65)
Homotropus Foerster, 1868. Verh. Naturh. Ver. Preuss. Rheinlande 25:
162. Type: Bassus elegans Gravenhorst. Automatically selected by
Viereck, 1912, when designated as genotype for isogenotypic Homocidus.
Homoporus Thomson, 1890. Opusc. Ent. 14:1488. Lapsus for Homotropus.
Name preoccupied by Thomson, 1878.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Homocidus Morley, 1911. Ichneumon. Brit. 4:87. New name for Homoporus
Thomson, 1890.
Length 3.5-10.2 mm. ; head transverse, width 1.15-1.50x height; face
width 1.5-2. 7x height, shagreened, usually punctate; clypeus width 1.5-2. 75x
height, basal margin level with face, indistinctly separated from the face by a
weak crease or more definitely by a suture, surface flattened or impressed a-
long apical margin, apical lobes well developed in most species; 17-25, usually
18-20, flagellar segments; antenna usually subequal to, or slightly shorter than
wing length; segments progressively shorter to apical segment; sense cones
usually separated by at least the width of a sense cone, but occasionally dense-
ly arranged; tyloids usually present on male antenna, variable; length of first
flagellar segment 3. 2-6.5x greatest diameter; occipital carina varying from
narrowly to broadly rounded medially; malar space 0.4-1.0x basal width of
mandible; female face seldom with yellow orbits; thorax length 1.6-2.1x width
of mesonotum, variously sculptured; notaulus lacking; sternaulus shallow; pro-
podeum usually lacking carinae or weakly carinate; wing usually possessing
areolet; nervulus opposite or distad of basal vein; nervellus usually broken be-
low middle, seldom at middle; 2-4, rarely 1 or 5, hamuli on costellan fold;
second abscissa of subdiscoideus varying from slightly to much shorter than
first abscissa; hind tibia slightly shorter than, or subequal to length of thorax,
its inner spur 0.35-0.58x length of hind basitarsus; hind tibia with few to many
setae on external surface; hind tibia varying in color from tawny-rufous to
black and white banded; abdomen rounded dorsally and tapered apically, only
occasionally strongly compressed; caudal margin of each tergum transverse
or slightly convex; petiole in dorsal view varying from almost quadrate to short
rectangular, dorsal carinae varying from strong to absent; second and third
segments usually wider than long; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and part of
3; Spiracle dorsad of lateral suture on segment 2, dorsal to, posterior to, or
ventral to suture on 3; length of abdomen 0. 8-1. 5x combined lengths of hind
femur and tibia; transverse impressions lacking from abdomen.
Key to the Neotropic species of Homotropus
Females
_ (Females of caluus, cuneatus, lissosoma, and trachysoma are unknown. )
1. Hind tibia black at base and apex with a white medial annulus...... 2
Hind tibia colored otherwise. . 2... 6) ./). «+ «4 ee SO era ge 5)
2. Thorax and propodeum rufous and cream; clypeus lacking apical lobes; ba-
sal vein straight; flagellum flattened and lacking sense cones ventrally on
Seeinents 10 tO ADEXK woe a ae ek aS 22. masoni, new species
Thorax and propodeum black and cream or yellow; clypeus with apical lobes
present; basal vein slightly curved; flagellum not flattened and not lacking
sense cones on segments 10 to apex ................44.. 3
3. Abdomen rufous on most of segment 2 to apex of abdomen; mesoscutum
evenly shagreened; malar space 0. 6x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.0x
POO eh Oe Oe Pe 13. interstinctus, new species
Abdomen black; mesoscutum polished and partially punctate; malar space
0.9-1.0x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.6-2.0x HO ......... 4
10.
1.
12.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 21
Areolet present; face black with small medial yellow spot; humeral bar
short; femora rufous; spiracle of petiole anterior to middle of segment;
petiole length 12x Width Oo rs ee es 1. brevis, new species
Areolet lacking; face entirely cream; humeral bar long recurved; femora
black; spiracle of petiole at middle of segment; petiole length 1. 7x width.
11. preclarus, new species
Thorax extensively rufous; areolet lacking; abdomen elongated and com- ©
pressed from segment 2 to apex; flagellar segment one 8. 3x as long as
wide; thorax slender, length 2. 25x width of mesoscutum; clypeus apically
truncate and not impressed. ......... 17. dolichus, new species
Thorax not rufous; areolet present or absent; abdomen usually not elonga-
ted, but if so, then not compressed; flagellar segment one 4.0-5.4x as
long as wide; thorax broader, length 1. 6-1.9x width of mesoscutum; cly-
peus usually lobed and often impressed along apical margin ..... 6
Abdomen elongated, equal to fore wing length; ramellus present; legs ru-
fous; mesoscutum polished and heavily punctate.
18. macrogaster, new species
Abdomen much shorter than length of fore wing; ramellus lacking; legs
variously colored; mesoscutum variously sculptured. ........
PEPGOUEU IRENE OR oe a ee er a ga 8
APOCOlELDTOBENE he eR ee OR FS ee ee ae ee ee 10
Prepectal carina complete; inner orbital bar lacking.
| 14. pacificus Cresson
Prepectal carina lacking ventrally; inner orbital bar present. ..... 9
Abdomen black, terga of segments 2-5 spotted with cream at posterior
corners; hind coxa rufous; mesoscutum polished and abundantly punc-
TONG OG ae ate ee 10. maculifrons Cresson
Abdomen banded with black and rufous; hind coxa black and yellow; meso-
scutum evenly shagreened........ 12. mexicanus, new species
Yellow inner orbital bar present; abdomen rufous from segment 2 to apex.
Ne ae ge CPE a rl OP ee tat ea a care wire a tae lca aoe ae cere O
Mesoscutum polished, deeply and abundantly punctate; inner orbital bar
not extending into malar space; hind coxa usually rufous.
2. decoratus Cresson
Mesoscutum polished, obscurely punctate; inner orbital bar extending into
malar space; hind coxa black and yellow... 8. comptus, new species
Hind leg largely fuscous except paler at apex of femur and ventrally on
tibia at base; OOC 2.0-2.25x HO; malar space 0.5-0. 6x basal width of
WAAROTIG G0, bebe aia ae es pipe re Ge eee I ad 13
Hind leg variously colored, but not as above; OOC 1.4-1.6x HO (except
1.9-2.0x in stictonotus, but malar space then 0. 8-0. 9x basal width of
WARROTTO) i es a PE A es A 14
22
13.
14.
15.
16.
LT:
18.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Propodeum rugulose and shagreened on petiolar area; petiole shagreened
and finely striate; areolet sessile; humeral bar present; abdomen cream-
yellow on apical margins of segments 2-7; petiole length 1. 5x width.
19. alternatus, new species
Propodeum polished; petiole mostly polished; areolet petiolate; humeral
bar lacking; abdomen black dorsally; petiole length 1. 9x width.
20. furvus, new species
Mesoscutum polished, deeply and abundantly punctate. ......... 15
Mesoscutum shagreened and finely punctate, or polished and nearly im-
DUMECAES oi es ee 2 es 16
Abdomen black; coxae largely blackened; mesopleurum black; face width
1,9-2.0x Weight 2. 66 3. nigritarsus fuscitarsus Provancher
Abdomen rufous from segment 2 to apex; coxae yellow on most of fore and
middle coxa and apex of hind coxa; mesopleurum with a longitudinal
stripe on lower surface; face width 1. 6x height. |
Do. Yruficauda, new species
Abdomen largely yellow from segment 2 to apex; legs striped with black
and pale yellow; mesoscutum polished and nearly impunctate.
6. flavidus, new species
Abdomen and legs variously colored, but not as above; mesoscutum vari-
ously sculptured oy polished. « . 6. eT
Abdomen black; face black; mesoscutum and mesopleurum polished, sparse-_
ly and finely punctate: apical lobes of clypeus small.
16. chilensis, new species
Abdomen variously marked with rufous or yellow; face marked with yellow
medial spot; mesoscutum and mesopleurum shagreened, or if polished,
then abundantly punctate; apical lobes of clypeus rather well developed.
Oe a ee ak 18
Thorax shagreened and finely punctate; apex of abdomen dusky rufous;
malar space black; face width 1. 6-1. 7x height; OOC 1.9-2.0x HO.
4. stictonotus, new species
Thorax polished and obscurely punctate on mesoscutum, more abundantly
punctate and lightly shagreened on mesopleurum; abdomen rufous apical-
ly and yellow laterally; malar space more or less yellow; face width 2.0-
2.1% height; OOC 1,6x HO. :. 2s uae, 7. limbatus, new species
Males
(Males of alternatus, furvus, masoni, mexicanus,
_ dolichus, and macrogaster are unknown. )
Hind tibia black at base and apex with a white medial annulus. ..... 2
Hine. tibia. colored otherwise... 2 6 Se eS i ee ie eee. 4
Mesoscutum evenly shagreened; OOC 0.9x HO; mesosternum extensively
marked with Cream .. .....0.68. ou) saree 13. interstinctus, new species
Mesoscutum polished and partially punctate; OOC 1.5x HO; mesosternum
ERC ee eee bs 3
10.
11.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 23
Areolet present; humeral bar short; femora rufous; spiracle of petiole an-
terior to middle of segment; petiole length 1. 2x width; tyloids on flagellar
segments TTS ee ee ae, 1. brevis, new species
Areolet lacking; humeral bar long recurved; femora black; spiracle of
petiole at middle of segment; petiole length 1. 85x width; tyloids lacking.
11. preclarus, new species
Aréolet lacking 7) ee eee a ee ee 5)
Areolet present er ee ee 7
Mesoscutum polished and impunctate; propodeum with transverse carina
between basal and petiolar areas; occipital carina angulate medially.
21. lissosoma, new species
Mesoscutum polished and punctate or shagreened; propodeum lacking trans-
verse carina; occipital carina rounded medially ............ 6
Prepectal carina incomplete ventrally; abdomen black, terga spotted with
cream at apical corners; mesoscutum polished and deeply punctate;
sense cones on flagellum closer together than the width of a cone.
| 10. maculifrons Cresson
Prepectal carina complete; abdomen variously banded with rufous on medi-
al segments; mesoscutum evenly an ae sense cones separated by
more than the width of acone.......... 14. pacificus Cresson
Tyloids on flagellar segments 7-10; thorax polished and nearly impunctate;
flagellum longer than fore wing. ....... 15. calvus, new species
Tyloids on flagellar segments 6 or T- 13, 14, 15, or 16; thorax variously
sculptured, occasionally polished; flagellum shorter than, or subequal
to. teneth of tere wie ee a ee 8
Face black with wedge-shaped inner orbital bar present; apical margin of
clypeus nearly truncate; mesopleurum and sternum black. ...... 9
Face yellow, occasionally black capillary lines extending onto face from
antennal fossae; apical margin of clypeus usually lobed; mesopleurum,
sometimes sternum, and often abdomen marked with yellow or rufous.
2 ee ee ee ee Oe
Mesoscutum polished; abdomen extensively dusky yellow, marked with
DIdCK Spots 0 a a 6. flavidus, new species
Mesoscutum shagreened; abdomen black ... .9. cuneatus, new species
Mesoscutum heavily shagreened; yellow on lower mesopleurum, mesoster-
num, proepisternum, and pronotal lobe; abdomen black, yellow banded
basally on segments 3-95.05. 2. eee re a ee 11
Mesoscutum polished and punctate, or if shagreened, then the thorax and
abdomen not as aD0Ve 2) Ce ee Pe ee, 12
Mesoscutum mostly impunctate; humeral bar not recurved; scutellum
Hlack 2 ee ee ee aes, 16. chilensis, new species
Mesoscutum abundantly punctate; humeral bar long recurved; scutellum
marked extensively with yellow. .... 23. trachysoma, new species
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
12. Abdomen black or banded with yellow at basal margins of medial segments.
Abdomen variously marked with rufous or yellow, either laterally or
apically on segments, but not at basal margins ............ 14
13. Mesoscutum polished, deeply and abundantly punctate; abdomen yellow
banded or spotted at bases of abdominal segments 3-6.
3. nigritarsus fuscitarsus Provancher
Mesoscutum shagreened and finely punctate; abdomen black.
4. stictonotus, new species
14. Humeral bar not recurved; face went 1.6-1.9x height.
5. ruficauda, new species
Humeral bar long recurved usually; face width 2.15-2.3x height i WLS
15. Mesoscutum polished, deeply and abundantly punctate; mesopleurum pol-
ished and punctate; many setae on external face of hind tibia.
2. decoratus Cresson
Mesoscutum polished or lightly shagreened and lightly punctate; meso-
pleurum partly shagreened and finely punctate; few setae on external
iC OF UR CER, os ss ea te ae ter ee eres WE 16
16. OOC 1.3-1.45x HO; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-14; prepectus black;
abdominal terga yellow laterally from segment 2 to abdominal apex.
7. limbatus, new species
OOC 1. 8x HO; tyloids on flagellar segments 6-15; prepectus yellow; ab-
dominal terga black laterally from segment 2 to abdominal apex.
8. comptus, new species
1. Homotropus brevis, new species
(Figure 13)
Female: 4.6 mm. (3.9 mm.); head shagreened, more polished and ob-
scurely punctate on gena; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1. 75x (1. 6x)
HO; frons medially sulcate before fore ocellus; face width 1. 7x (1. 8x) height;
clypeus separated from face by a weak crease, width 1. 85x height, apical
lobes rounded with a moderate median emargination, impressed along apical
margin, shagreened; malar space 1.0x (0. 9x) basal width of mandible; upper
tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 19 (18) flagellar segments; sense cones
separated by more than the width of a cone, conspicuous; hairs on flagellum
short and inclined; mesoscutum polished, finely punctate on basal 0.25; re-
mainder of thorax mostly polished, punctate on mesopleurum and mesoster-
num, with some light shagreen on pronotum and lower mesopleurum; prepec-
tal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina well defined;
propodeum mostly polished dorsally, roughly shagreened laterally, petiolar
area enclosed by several weak circular carinulae; areolet present, broadly
sessile, second intercubitus unpigmented; nervulus opposite basal vein; ner-
vellus broken below middle; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; lightly
shagreened and obscurely punctate on coxae and femora; no setae on external
face of hind tibia; abdomen narrowed from base of segment 4, rather strongly
compressed from segment 6 to apex; petiole length 1.2x width, shagreened and
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 25
finely striate medially, more rugulose laterally, margins divergent behind
spiracles; segment 2 wider than long, striate at base, medially shagreened,
and more polished at apex; segments 3 and 4 shagreened on basal 0.5, polished
on remainder of these segments and remainder of abdomen; epipleura distinct
on segment 2 and basal 0.6 of 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures; abdomen nearly
glabrous.
Black. Yellow on small median facial spot, clypeus except for dusky apical
lobes, palpi, anteriorly on tegula, subtegular ridge, spot posteriorly on lower
mesopleurum; fuscous posteriorly on tegula and on axillary sclerites; legs
largely rufous; black at base of fore coxa, most of middle and hind coxa, all
_ first trochanters; cream on remainder of coxae and trochanters, annulus me-
dially on hind tibia, and apex of each femur; dusky at base and apex of hind
tibia, dorsal stripe on fore and middle tibiae, all tarsi; cream on stigma dor-
sally and ventrally; reddish-brown at apical margins of abdominal segments 2,
3, and 4. :
Male: 3.7 mm. ; face width 1. 7x height; clypeus width 2.2x height; malar
space 0. 6x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.5x HO; 18 flagellar segments; ty-
loids on flagellar segments 7-13. |
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape ventrally; thorax and legs colored as in female, but with black of
fore and middle coxae limited to base; abdomen with pale basal margin on seg-
ments 4 and 5.
This species is recognizable by the banded hind tibia, black coxae, pol-
ished mesoscutum, and short petiole.
Type: 9, Laguna Amarga, Natales, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 14-21, 1960,
L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 9, Caramavida, Arunco, Chile, Feb. 10, 1953, L. Pena
(Ottawa). @, Hda Illapel, Coquimbo, Chile, Oct. 28, 1954, L. Pefia (Ottawa).
o, La Fusta, Cord. Lonquimay, Chile, Feb. 6-21, 1962, L. Pena (Townes).
2, Las Cabras, Chile, at 1,480 m., Dec. 10-23, 1954, L. Pena (Ottawa). 39,
La Leonora, O’Higgins, Chile, Dec. 28, 1954, L. Pefia (Ottawa). 30%, 19,
Liucura, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 1-9, 1959, L. Pefia (Ottawa). 29, Pichinahuel,
Cordillera Nahuelbuta, Arauco, Chile, at 1,100-1,400 m., Jan. 1-10 and 20-
28, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa). 9, Port. de Puyehue, Osorno, Chile, March 13-
19, 1955, L. Pena (Ottawa).
2. Homotropus decoratus Cresson
(Figure 14)
Bassus decoratus Cresson, 1878. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1878:375. o&.
Type: o, California (Philadelphia).
Biology: Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19: 723, 727. - Kamal, 1939. Tech.
Scient. Serv. Bul. Min. Agr. Egypt 207:12, 23-35, 46-47, figs. 33-34,
91.
Female: 5.2-6.6 mm.; head shagreened and finely punctate, more pol-
ished on frons and gena; OOC 1. 50-1. 75x HO; face width 2.1-2.2x height; cly-
peus separated from face by a definite suture, width 1.9-2.6x height, apical
lobes weakly rounded with median emargination shallow, impressed laterally
on apical lobes, polished and punctate; malar space 0.6-0. 8x basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible strongly bidentate; 19-21 flagellar seg-
ments, first segment length 3. 8-4.5x width; sense cones sparse on segment
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
one, inconspicuous; flagellum covered with a short erect pile; thorax polished,
closely and deeply punctate; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina low;
propodeum bearing complete lateral carinae, shagreened basally, petiolar area
vertically carinate medially, rugulose on rest; wing areolet small and rectangu-
lar, petiolate, second intercubitus unpigmented; 2-3 hamuli on costellan fold;
legs stout; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; numerous strong
setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, widened to seg-
ment 3, progressively narrowed from base of segment 4 to apex of abdomen;
petiole stout, margins slightly divergent, length 1.1-1.3x width, shagreened,
striate laterally behind spiracle, a pair of carinae converging from base to
near middle; segment 2 wider than long, striate basally; rest of abdomen sha-
greened, more polished from segment 3 to apex; abdomen lightly pubescent;
epipleura distinct on segment 2, basal 0.8 of 3, inflexed; spiracles dorsad of
sutures.
Black. Yellow on clypeus but darkened on impressed areas; yellow on man-
dible, palpi, orbital bar widened ventrally, round median facial spot; rufous
ventrally on scape; yellow on humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spot
under fore wing, mesepimeron, two spots or a band apically on scutellum,
capillary lines between wings; legs largely rufous; dusky rufous on hind tibia
and tarsus; yellow on fore and middle coxae; blackened basally and internally
on fore and middle coxae; abdomen rufous, black on most of segment one and
at apex of abdomen. Occasional specimens tend to have the black extending on-
to segment 2 and spreading anteriorly on segments 4 and 5. These specimens
usually show a partial infuscation of the hind coxa.
Male: 5.2-7.2 mm.; OOC 1.5-1. 7x HO; face width 2.2x height; clypeus
width 2. 3-2.4x height, truncate apically, median emargination lacking, weakly
impressed apically, polished and impunctate; 19-22 flagellar segments; tyloids
on segments 6 or 7 to 14 or 15; hairs of flagellum short and erect; abdomen
slender; petiole length 1. 4x width: abdomen strongly pubescent.
Black. Bright yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space,
inner orbit, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar recurved to middle of
mesoscutum, widened at end of band, all or part of scutellum, proepisternum,
tip of pronotal lobe, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron, prepectus, narrow
longitudinal stripe on mesopleurum, a short line internal to sternaulus; legs as
in female, but with more yellow on all coxae apically; black basally and inter-
nally on all coxae, first hind trochanter; rufous on apical half of abdominal seg-
ment 2, all of 3, apically or all of 4 and 5; yellow at base of each of segments
3-5; rufous ventrally. In some specimens the abdomen of the male is some-
times heavily blackened so that only the apical margins of segments 2-6 are
rufous and the coxae are more extensively blackened than usual. Very rarely
the recurved portion of the humeral bar is lacking.
Specimen: do’, Rosarito Beach, Baja California, Mexico, April 2, 1939, C.
Michener (San Francisco}.
This species occurs along the west coast of North America from Baja
California to southern British Columbia.
3. Homotropus nigritarsus fuscitarsus Provancher
(Figure 15)
Tryphon humeralis Provancher, 1875. Nat. Canad. 7:116. ‘‘9’’=c". Lecto-
type: o, Quebec (Quebec).
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 27
Bassus fuscitarsus Provancher, 1875. Nat. Canad. 7:143. ‘‘o"’’=9. Lecto-
type: ¢, Quebec (Quebec). :
Biology: Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19:723, 727. - Heiss, 1938. Ill.
Biol. Monog. 36 (1): 99-100. - Kamal, 1939. Tech. Scient. Serv. Bul.
Min. Agr. Egypt 207: 25-26, 47, 54, fig. 35-37, 96. - Butler & Dasch,
1958. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 135: 8.
Female: 4.6-6.2 mm.; head dull shagreened, finely punctate; OOC 1. 4-
1.6x HO; face width 1.9-2.0x height; clypeus separated from face by a weak
crease, width 1.9-2.3x height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median
emargination, strongly impressed on apical lobes, polished and impunctate;
malar space 0.7-0.9x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible distinct-
ly bidentate; 18-20 flagellar segments; sense cones sparse on segment one;
flagellum covered with a very short sparse pile; thorax polished, deeply and
abundantly punctate, lightly shagreened on pronotal lobe, usually mesopleurum,
except on speculum; metapleurum more scabrous; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina indistinct; propodeum with complete lateral carina, shagreened
basally, rugulose on petiolar area; wing areolet rectangular, sessile, second
intercubitus unpigmented; 2-3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and
femora polished and obscurely punctate; numerous strong setae on external
face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded, progressively narrowed from base of seg-
ment 4; petiole rectangular, margins weakly divergent behind spiracles, length
1.3-1.4x width, shagreened, short carinae from base to behind spiracles; seg-
ment 2 wider than long, striate basally and laterally; rest of abdomen sha-
greened, more polished apically; sparse pubescence on abdomen; epipleura
distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.7 of 3, inflexed; spiracles dorsad of lateral
sutures.
Black. Bright yellow on clypeus, mandible, round median spot on face;
dusky yellow on palpi; yellow on humeral bar, apex of both scutellum and post-
scutellum, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron; |
legs rufous on femora, tibiae, and tarsi; more dusky on hind tarsus and apex
of hind tibia; black in large part on coxae and first trochanters; yellow at apices
of coxae, all second trochanters. Some western specimens have small yellow
orbital bars. Occasionally the scutellum is black; sometimes the prepectus is
yellow spotted; rarely the face is entirely black. |
Male: 4.6-6.8 mm.; OOC 1.5-1. 8x HO; face width 2.0-2.25x height; apical
lobes of clypeus weakly rounded, apical emargination very shallow; 19-21,
rarely 22, flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 6 or 7-13, 14, or
15; flagellum covered with short erect hairs; abdomen slender, widest at seg-
ment 3, gradually narrowed basad and distad of it; petiole length 1. 4-1. 9x
width; abundant short pubescence on abdomen. :
Black. Bright yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, in-
ner orbit, scape ventrally; a black line sometimes extends down from each an-
tennal fossa towards clypeus; yellow on humeral bar, tegula, apex of scutellum,
tip of proepisternum, tip of pronotal lobe, spots laterally and ventrally on pre-
pectus, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron; legs paler than in female, fore
and middle coxae extensively marked apically with yellow; yellow spotted or
banded at base of each of abdominal segments 3-6. Frequently there is a par-
tial longitudinal yellow stripe above the middle coxa; the prepectus is occasion-
ally all yellow; sometimes the basal yellow abdominal bands are strongly
developed; occasionally the scutellum is all black.
Specimen: o, Juarez, Mexico, Jan. 17, 1941 (Washington).
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
This subspecies is distributed west of 100° W. longitude from Alaska into
Mexico and eastward in the Canadian zone to the Atlantic. The typical sub-
species occurs in Europe, and subspecies groenlandicus occurs in Greenland.
4. Homotropus stictonotus, new species
(Figure 16)
Female: 5.2 mm. (4.1-5.4 mm.); head shagreened; occipital carina
rounded; OOC 2.0x (1. 9x) HO; frons vertically sulcate before medial ocellus;
face width 1. 6x (1. 7x) height; clypeus separated from face by a weak crease,
width 1. 85x (2.0x) height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emar- |
gination, impressed along apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0. 8x basal
width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly concave; 20 (21) flagellar
segments; sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone, conspicu-
ous; hairs on flagellum short and inclined; thorax lightly shagreened, more
polished laterally on mesoscutum and on speculum, moderately punctate on
mesoscutum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural |
carina well developed; propodeum with lateral carina developed, shagreened on
basal and lateral areas, more rugulose on petiolar area; areolet square, ses-
sile, 2nd intercubitus unpigmented; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus
broken below middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femo-
ra lightly shagreened and obscurely punctate; setae lacking from external face
of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed from seg-
ment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole length 1.4x width, evenly shagreened, mar-
gins weakly divergent behind spiracles; segment 2 slightly wider than long; re-
mainder of abdomen shagreened, progressively more polished towards apex;
epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures; abdomen
almost glabrous.
Black. Cream on small median facial spot, clypeus, and mandible; palpi
slightly dusky; cream on humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, upper end
of mesepimeron, longitudinal stripe posteriorly on lower mesopleurum; legs
largely rufous, more dusky apically on hind tibia and on all tarsi; cream on
fore and middle coxae and trochanters, apex of hind coxa, second hind trochan-
ter, ventrally on hind tibia at base; black at bases of fore and middle coxae,
hind coxa except for apex, and hind first trochanter; rufous on apical margins
of abdominal segments 2 and 3, apical 0.4 of segment 4, most of remaining
segments except for slight dorsal infuscation, and on epipleura. Sometimes
the fore and middle first trochanters are fuscous; the rufous of the abdomen
may be reduced to the apices of the terminal segments.
Male: 4.3-5.5 mm.; face width 1. 7-1.9x height; clypeus width 2.1-2. 3x
height; malar space 0. 8-1.0x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.4x HO; 20-21
flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-15; hairs on flagellum
short and erect; petiole length 1.5-1.7x width; abdomen more pubescent than
in female. .
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, proepisternum, tip of
pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, upper end of mesepimeron, prepectus, longi-
tudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum; legs as in female; yellow basal bands on
abdominal segments 4, 5, and 6; rufous on apical margins of segments 2-7 and
on epipleura. Black capillary lines often extend partly or entirely from an-
tennal fossae to clypeus. Occasional specimens are blackened on the abdomen
except for the basal yellow bands.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 29
This species is recognizable by the shagreened and punctate mesoscutum,
the longitudinal stripe on the mesopleurum, the black hind coxa, the rufous
apex of the female abdomen, and the rugulose petiolar area of the propodeum.
: Type: 9, Laguna Amarga, Natales, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 14-21, 1960,
L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: lo’, 29, Laguna Amarga, Natales, Magallanes, Chile, Dec.
11, 14-21, 1960, L. Pena (Townes). 20°, La Peninsula, Magallanes, Chile,
Dec. 11, 1960, T. Cehalovick (Townes). o, 9, 35 km. south of Porvenir,
Tierra del Fuego, Chile, Dec. 4-8, 1960, L. Pena (Townes). 30%, 19, Rio
Tres Pasos, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 11, 1960, T. Cehalovick (Townes). <c,
Seno de Otway, Magallanes, Chile, Feb. 26, 1961 (Townes).
0. Homotropus ruficauda, new species
(Figure 17)
Female: 4.8 mm. (5.0 mm.); head shagreened, more polished on frons
and gena, obscurely punctate on gena; occipital carina rounded; OOC 1.55x
(1.4x) HO; face width 1.6x height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median
emargination, impressed along apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0. 8x
(0. 9x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate;
20 (21) flagellar segments; sense cones separated by more than the width of a
cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum short and inclined; thorax mostly pol-
ished, deeply and closely punctate on mesoscutum, more obscurely anteriorly
and ventrally on mesopleurum, and on mesosternum; prepectal carina com-
plete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina strong; propodeum with weak
lateral carina, shagreened on basal areas, more scabrous on petiolar area;
areolet square, sessile, second intercubitus pigmented; nervulus distad of ba-
sal vein; nervellus broken slightly below middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold;
legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened and obscurely punctate; setae
lacking from external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, progres-
sively narrowed from segment 3 to apex; petiole length 1. 3x (1. 5x) width, sha-
greened, margins slightly divergent behind spiracles; segment 2 slightly
wider than long; abdomen shagreened and largely glabrous; epipleura distinct
on segment 2 and basal 0.6 of 3.
Black. Yellow on median facial spot, clypeus, mandible, palpi, humeral
bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, tip of proepisternum, longitudinal stripe on
lower mesopleurum, tip of mesepimeron; yellow on fore and middle coxae and
trochanters; black on basal 0.7 of hind coxa, the lateral angles and apex yellow;
black on first hind trochanter; femora and tibia mostly tawny-rufous except
dusky at base and apex of hind tibia, dorsally on other tibiae, and on all tarsi;
rufous on apical 0.4 of abdominal segment 2 and remaining segments to apex
of abdomen; ovipositor sheath black.
Male: 4.3-4.4 mm.; face width 1:6-1.9x height; clypeus width 2.3-2. 4x
height; 20 flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-15; petiole
length 1.6-1.7x width; abdominal pubescence light.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape, and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
proepisternum, prepectus, subtegular ridge, most of mesepimeron, wide
stripe on lower mesopleurum; legs and abdomen as in female. The abdominal
segments may be slightly infuscated basally and medially.
This species is recognizable by the polished and punctate mesoscutum, the
red abdomen, and the color of the hind coxa and tibia.
. 30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Type: 92, Tolhuaca, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 8-11, 1962, L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 20’, Bio-Bio, Salto del Abanico, Chile, Dec. 30, 1950, Ross
& Michelbacher (San Francisco). 9, Cherquenco, Cautin, Chile, March, 1954,
L. Pefia (Ottawa). 9, Lago Galletue, Cordillera Lonquimay, Chile, Jan. 19-
31, 1962, L. Pena (Townes). og. Liucura, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 1-9, 1959;
at 1, 800 m. , Jan. 6-10, 1959, iL Pena (Ottawa).
6. Homotropus flavidus, new species
(Figure 18)
Female: 5.0 mm.; head shagreened, more polished on frons and gena,
obscurely punctate on gena; occipital carina broadly rounded medially; OOC
1.6x HO; face width 1. 75x height; clypeus separated from face by a weak
crease, width 2.2x height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emar-
gination, impressed along apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0. 9x basal
width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible weakly concave; 19 flagellar seg-
ments; sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone; hairs on fla-
gellum very short and inclined; thorax largely polished, lightly shagreened on
groove of pronotum, obscurely punctate on lower and anterior mesopleurum
and on mesosternum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina strong; propodeum with irregular weak lateral carina, sha-
greened on basal areas, more rugulose on petiolar area; areolet large, rec-
tangular, sessile, second intercubitus unpigmented; nervulus opposite basal
vein; nervellus broken below middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender;
coxae and femora weakly shagreened and obscurely punctate; setae lacking on
external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed
from base of segment 3 to apex, weakly compressed at apex; petiole length
1.4x width, shagreened, margins slightly divergent behind spiracles; segment
2 wider than long; abdomen shagreened, progressively more polished apically;
epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures; abdomen
largely glabrous.
Black. Cream on clypeus, mandible, palpi with apical segments infus-
cated, small humeral bar, tegula, lateral stripes on scutellum, lateral edge
of proepisternum, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, small
spot on posterior lower mesopleurum; legs mostly cream; black at bases of
fore and middle coxae, internally and anteriorly and a posterior spot on hind
coxa, first trochanters, a dorsal and ventral stripe on each femur, a dorsal
stripe on each tibia and tarsus; tarsi more dusky; yellow at apex of petiole,
basally and laterally on segments 2-6, rufous on remainder of these segments
except for three black spots on each side of terga 2-6.
Male: 4.3-4.7 mm.; face width 2. 0x height; clypeus width 2. 4x height,
- apical lobes nearly lacking, median emargination very shallow; depression
between tentorial pits rather deep; malar space 0. 8-0.9x basal width of man-
dible; OOC 1.75x HO; 19 flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments T-
15; petiole length 1.4-1. 6x width.
Black. Yellow on narrow inner orbital bar on lower 0.5 of eye, apical
0.5 of clypeus, mandible, palpi, small spot under each wing and sometimes
on lower mesopleurum; legs similar to female or the hind coxa entirely black,
and the fuscous stripes broader than in the female; abdomen as in female, but
the yellow areas somewhat dusky.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 31
This species is distinctive in its polished mesoscutum, the narrow male
clypeus, and the color of the legs and abdomen.
Type: 9, Isla Navarino, ‘‘P. Williams’’, Magallanes, Chile, Feb. 5,
1957, T. Cehalovick (Townes).
Paratypes: 20’, Monte Fenton, Chile, Jan. 9, 1952, L. Pena (Ottawa). ©
7. Homotropus limbatus, new species
(Figure 19)
Female: 5.4 mm. (5.1 mm.); head shagreened, more polished on gena,
finely punctate on face and gena; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1. 6x
HO; face width 2. 1x (2. 0x) height; clypeus separated from face by a strong
crease, width 2.1x (2.3x) height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median
emargination, only weakly impressed apically, mostly polished; malar space
0. 6x (0.'7x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible very shallowly
notched; 19 (18) flagellar segments; sense cones separated by about the width
of a cone, inconspicuous; mesoscutum polished, punctate anteriorly and before
scutellum, rest of thorax mixed shagreened and punctate, polished around
speculum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural
carina low; propodeum with weak basal and lateral carinae, shagreened basal-
ly, more rugulose on petiolar area; areolet square, sessile (or short petio-
late), second intercubitus pigmented; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus
broken below middle; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and fe-
mora weakly shagreened and obscurely punctate; few setae on external face of
hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed from base of
segment 4 to apex; petiole length 1.4x width, shagreened, more scabrous be-
hind spiracle; segment 2 slightly wider than long; abdomen shagreened, more
polished from segment 4 to apex, mostly glabrous; epipleura distinct on seg-
ment 2 and basal 0.5 of 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures.
Black. Yellow on small facial spot, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi somewhat dusky; yellow on recurved humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal
lobe, spot under each wing; legs yellow on coxae except black on basal 0.7 of ©
hind coxa; yellow on trochanters and anteriorly on femora, ventrally on all
tibiae; dusky on tibiae dorsally and on tarsi; remainder of legs tawny-rufous;
abdomen rufous behind apical 0.3 of segment 3 to apex of abdomen, yellow
along lateral margins of segments 2 to apex and on all epipleura. The hume-
ral bars are frequently not recurved. The rufous portions of the abdomen
may be variously infuscated. The medial facial spot may be lacking.
Male: 5.6-5.8 mm.; face width 2.2-2.3x height; clypeus width 2.1-2. 4x
height; malar space 0. 7-0. 8x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.3-1.45x HO; 20
flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-14; petiole length 1.4-1. 5x
width; abdomen finely pubescent.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible,
palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; thorax as in female, occasionally a small
yellow spot or stripe on lower posterior mesopleurum; legs and abdomen as
in female; the rufous of the abdomen may be largely infuscated. Occasionally
black capillary lines extend from the antennae to the clypeus.
This species is recognizable by the polished mesoscutum with its puncta-
tion anteriorly and posteriorly, the yellow malar space of the female, the ru-
fous and yellow color pattern of the abdomen, and the occasionally recurved
humeral bars.
32 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Type: 9, Laguna Dam, Coquimbo Province, Chile, at 8,000 ft., Dec. 6,
1950, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco).
Paratypes: 30°, 49, Belen, Tarapaca, Chile, at 3,340 m., Oct. 17, 25,
and Nov. 19, 1952, L. Pena (Ottawa). o’, Hda Illapel, Coquimbo, Chile,
Nov. 1, 1954, L. Pena (Ottawa). 40°, 209, Laguna Dam, Coquimbo Prov.,
Chile, at 8,000 ft., Dec. 5 and 6, 1950, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco).
o, 5 miles north of Laguna Dam, Coquimbo Prov., Chile, at 8,000 ft., Dec.
6, 1950, Ross & Michelbacher (San Francisco). 9, Las Condes, Santiago,
Chile, Oct. 1953, L. Pefia (Ottawa). o', Portezuelo Tres Cruces, Coquimbo
Prov., Chile, at 1,900 m., Oct. 30, 1957, L. Pena (Townes).
8. Homotropus comptus, new species.
(Figures 20 and 54)
Female: 6.5 mm.; head shagreened and finely punctate; occipital carina
broadly rounded; OOC 1.45x HO; vertex shallowly sulcate medially; face width
2. 3x height; clypeus separated from face by a very weak crease, width 2.1x
height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emargination, shallowly
impressed along apical margin, polished; malar space 0. 9x basal width of
mandible; upper and lower teeth of mandible broadly truncate; 19 flagellar seg-
ments; sense cones separated by about the width of a sense cone, inconspicu- -
ous; hairs on flagellum forming a short silvery pile; mesoscutum polished and
finely punctate except in a medial and a lateral glabrous area; rest of thorax
lightly shagreened and abundantly but finely punctate; prepectal carina com-
plete; mesosternal suture shallow; sternaulus rather deep; pleural carina well
defined; propodeum with low lateral carina, shagreened, slightly more rugu-
lose on petiolar area, spiracle with conspicuous raised lip; areolet small,
long petiolate; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken well below mid-
dle; discoidella rather weak; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs rather stout; pol-
ished and obscurely punctate on coxae and femora; few setae on external face
of hind tibia; abdomen stout, rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed from
base of segment 3 to apex; petiole broad, length 1.1x width, shagreened, with
a strong lateral carina from spiracle to apex; segment 2 broad, width 1. 8x
length; rest of abdomen shagreened and mostly glabrous, more polished to- |
wards apex; epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3; spiracles dorsad of lateral |
sutures. | )
Black. Yellow on median facial spot, malar space and lower inner orbit,
_ clypeus except for basal black spot and mandible; palpi somewhat dusky; yel-
low on long recurved humeral bar, tegula, tip of proepisternum, tip of prono-
tal lobe, prepectus, subtegular ridge, upper end of mesepimeron, and longi-
tudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum; legs black on bases of fore and middle
coxae, basal 0.7 of hind coxa except for angles, first hind trochanter, poste-
rior stripes on fore and middle femora, dorsal stripes on fore and middle
tibiae, anterior and posterior stripes on hind femur, dorsal stripe and basal
and apical bands on hind tibia, all tarsi; remainder of legs mostly yellow; ru-
fous on narrow apical triangle on abdominal segment 2, and all of remaining
segments posteriorly; more yellow on lower inflexed and ventral surfaces.
The paratype from Peru has the apical abdominal segments slightly infus-
cated basally and laterally, the hind femur more rufous, and the prepectus
black.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 33
Male: 4.9-5.0 mm. ; face width 2.15x height, margins divergent ventrally;
clypeus width 2. 1-2. 25x ‘height: malar space 0.75-0.9x basal width of mandi-
ble; OOC 1. 8x HO; 19 flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 6-15;
petiole length 1. Ao OX width.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; thorax and legs as in female;
the scutellum may have a median transverse yellow stripe; abdomen as in fe-
male, but apically and sometimes laterally infuscated; the apical margins of
segments 2-7 are narrowly banded with yellow.
This species is recognizable by the largely polished mesoscutum, the
_ broadly truncate teeth of the mandible, the conspicuous raised margin of the
propodeal spiracle, the broad petiole and second abdominal segment of the
female, and the color of the face, legs, humeral bars, and abdomen.
Type: 2, Lago Argentina, Province Santa Cruz, Puerto Bandera, Argen-
tina, Jan. 26, 1962, T. Cehalovick (Townes).
Paratypes: 20°, Liucura, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 1-9, 1959, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 9, La Huerta, Peru, 3,800 m., Nov. 24, 1955, L. Pena (Ottawa).
9. Homotropus cuneatus, new species
(Figures 21 and 55)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 5.1 mm. (3.9 mm.); head shagreened, obscurely punctate on gena;
vertex sloping abruptly to occipital carina from behind ocelli; occipital carina
transverse medially; OOC 1.5x HO; face width 1. 6x (1. 7x) height: clypeus
separated from face by a weak crease, width 2. 3x (2.1x) height, truncate
apically, median emargination nearly lacking, impressed along apical margin,
shagreened; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible
very shallowly concave; 20 (21) flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar seg-
ments 7-14 (15); sense cones abundant, separated by the width of a cone; hairs
on flagellum short and erect ventrally, inclined dorsally; thorax polished,
some light shagreen laterally and posteriorly on mesoscutum, on pronotum,
low on mesopleurum and mesosternum, finely punctate medially on mesoscu-
tum, on mesopleurum except for speculum, and on mesosternum; prepectal
carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina strong; propode-
um with lateral carina, basal area lightly shagreened, petiolar and lateral
areas weakly rugulose; areolet square, sessile, second intercubitus pigmen-
ted; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken slightly below middle; 3
hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora lightly shagreened
and obscurely punctate; no setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen rather
broad, progressively narrowed from segment 5 to apex; petiole length 1. 7x
(1. 45x) width, shagreened, weakly rugulose laterally, a lateral carina from
spiracle to apex; segment 2 much wider than long, shagreened, striate basally
and laterally; remaining segments mostly shagreened and lightly punctate,
more polished apically; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.7 of 3;
spiracles of segments 2 and 3 dorsad of sutures; abdomen with abundant short
pubescence.
Black. Yellow on broad inner orbit from level of antenna to clypeus, cly-
peus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, tegula, tip of mesepimeron; black on
bases of fore and middle coxae, all of hind coxa, all first trochanters; yellow
on rest of coxae and trochanters; tawny ventrally on hind tibia; rest of legs
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
mostly rufous; dusky at bases of fore and middle femora, basal 0. 6+ (or most)
of hind femur, dorsally and apically on hind tibia, hind tarsus. Sometimes a
yellow spot is present on the middle of the face. |
This species is recognizable in the male by the yellow inner orbits, the
truncate clypeus, the presence of an areolet, the sculpturing of the thorax, the
color of the legs, and the black abdomen.
Type: o, Funza, Cundimarca, Columbia, Nov. 24, 1955, E. C. Maiz
(Townes).
Paratypes: 2c, Bogota, Cundimarca, Malezas, Columbia, Nov. 9, 1954,
M. Revelo (Townes). o, Funza, Cundimarca, Columbia, Nov. 24, 1955, E.
Maiz (Townes). 2c, Lago Surucucho, 11 miles west of Cuenca, Ecuador, Feb.
16, 1955, E. Schlinger & E. Ross (San Francisco). o, Pass on Pacific-Atlan-
tic Divide, Estado Trujillo, Venezuela, at 8, 000-9, 000 ft., Sept. 15, 1957,
Malkin (San Francisco).
10. Homotropus maculifrons Cresson
(Figure 22)
Bassus maculifrons Cresson, 1865. Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila. 4:272. 9. Type:
2, California (Philadelphia).
Bassus semifasciatus Walsh, 1873. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis S70. SO,
Type: o, ?Illinois (destroyed).
Biology: Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19: 722, 727. - Kamal, 1939. Tech.
Scient. Serv. Bul. Min. Agr. Egypt 207:12, 14-21, 46-47, 49-50, -52, 54,
57, fig. 11-27, 86,. 93.
Female: 5.8-7.8 mm. ; head weakly inflated on gena, dull shagreened,
more polished on gena, strongly punctate on face and vertex, obscurely punc-
tate on gena; OOC 1.6-1.75x HO; face width 2.2-2.7x height; clypeus separa-
ted from face by a definite suture, width 2.1-2.2x height, apical lobes rounded
with a shallow median emargination, weakly impressed laterally on apical
lobes, polished; malar space 0.4-0. 7x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of ©
mandible bidentate; 19-21, rarely 18 or 22 flagellar segments, first segment
length 4.1-4.5x width; sense cones closer together than the width of a cone,
abundant on segment one, inconspicuous; flagellum covered with short erect
hairs; thorax polished, deeply and closely punctate; prepectal carina incom-
plete ventrally; pleural carina low; propodeum lacking carinae, evenly sha-
greened and punctate basally, rough shagreened on petiolar area; wing lacking
areolet, or rarely present; 2-5 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae
and femora polished and obscurely punctate; numerous strong setae on exter-
nal face of hind tibia; hind tibia weakly compressed apically; abdomen progres-
sively narrowed from base of segment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole stout rec-
tangular, length 1.3-1.5x width, shagreened, weakly scabrous laterally; seg-
ment 2 wider than long, shagreened, polished apically; rest of abdomen pol-
ished, very faintly shagreened; abdomen sparsely pubescent; epipleura dis-
tinct on segment 2 and base of 3, inflexed; spiracle of 3 ventrad of suture.
Black. Bright yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, round median facial
spot, curved band from clypeus to eye, recurved humeral bar, tegula, tip of
pronotal lobe, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron, and most of scutellum and
postscutellum; legs largely rufous; yellow on fore coxa except black at base;
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 35 -
fuscous at apex of hind tibia and all of hind tarsus; yellow on large spots at
posterior corners of abdominal segments 2-6 and ventrally on intersegmental ©
membranes.
Male: 4.9-7.1 mm.; OOC 1.4-1.8x HO; face width 2. 2x height; 20-22,
rarely 19 flagellar segments; tyloids variable, on segments 5 or 6-15, 16, 17,
or 18; petiole length 1.5-1.6x width; abdomen more pubescent than in female.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, inner or-
bit, scape and pedicel ventrally, long recurved humeral bar, tegula, scutel-.
lum, postscutellum, proepisternum, large spot at apex of pronotal lobe, spot
under fore wing, mesepimeron, prepectus, and a longitudinal stripe low on
mesopleurum; legs as in female, but paler on fore and middle legs; yellow on
fore and middle coxae and trochanters; large cream spots at apical corners
of abdominal segments 2-6, and all of inflexed surface.
Specimen: o, Rosarito Beach, Baja California, Mexico, April 2, 1939,
C. Michener (San Francisco).
This species is distributed in the Canadian, Transition, and Upper Sonoran
faunas of western North America, and is also reported from Hawaii.
11. Homotropus preclarus, new species
(Figure 23)
Female: 6.7 mm.; head shagreened and obscurely punctate; occipital
carina rounded; OOC 2.0x HO; face width 2.1x height; clypeus separated from
face by a weak crease, width 1. 8x height, apical lobes rounded with a mode-
rate median emargination, shagreened; malar space 1. 0x basal width of man-
dible; upper tooth of mandible broad, shallowly concave; 23 flagellar segments;
sense cones abundant, closer together than the width of a cone; hairs of fla-
gellum forming a low dense pile; thorax polished, lightly shagreened on pro-
notum, finely punctate anteriorly on mesoscutum, anteriorly and ventrally on
mesopleurum and on mesosternum; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal
suture shallow; pleural carina low; propodeum lacking carinae, mostly pol-
ished, petiolar face abruptly vertical, a series of fine carinulae around petio-
lar area; areolet lacking; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken far >
below middle; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs stout, hind tibia compressed,
coxae and femora lightly shagreened and finely punctate; no spines on external
face of hind tibia; abdomen broad, widest at apex of segment 3, then progres-
sively narrowed to apex; petiole length 1. 7x width, mostly polished, striate
except medially at apex, spiracle prominent at middle of segment; segment 2
much wider than long, deeply striate on basal 0.54; remainder of abdomen pol-
ished and glabrous; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.5 of 3; spira-
cles dorsad of sutures.
Black. Cream on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, and
scape ventrally; palpi fuscous; cream on humeral bar recurved to scutellum,
lateral band on scutellum continuing the humeral bar, postscutellum, anterior
0.5+ of tegula, laterally on proepisternum, tip of pronotal lobe, prepectus,
subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, short longitudinal stripe on lower mesopleu-
rum; black on posterior portion of tegula and on axillary sclerites; legs mostly
black, cream on apical 0.8 of fore coxa, apical 0.4 of middle coxa, ventrally
on fore femur, medially on fore tibia, apex of middle femur, medially on mid-
dle and hind tibiae.
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Male: 6.6 mm.; face width 1.9x height; clypeus width 1. 6x height; malar
space 1.1x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.5x HO; 22 flagellar segments; ty-
loids lacking; petiole length 1. 85x width.
Coloring as in female, except for more cream on proepisternum, a wider
stripe on the mesopleurum, and a white longitudinal band on the middle femur
anteriorly.
This species is recognizable by the absence of tyloids in the male, the
closely placed sense cones of the female flagellum, the cream face of the fe-
male, the extensive cream and black markings of the thorax and legs, the
striations of abdominal segments 1 and 2, and the location of the petiolar spira-
cle at the median point of the segment.
Type: 9, Jalapa, Veracruz, Mexico, Aug. 1-6, 1961, R. & K. Dreisbach
(Townes).
Paratype: o, Jalapa, Veracruz, Mexico, Sept. 28-Oct. 3, 1961, R. & K.
Dreisbach (Dreisbach).
12. Homotropus mexicanus, new species
(Figures 24 and 57)
Female: 5.0 mm.; head shiny shagreened, obscurely punctate on gena;
occipital carina rounded; OOC 1.4x HO; face width 2. 35x height; clypeus sepa-
rated from face by a weak crease, width 1.9x height, apical lobes rounded
with a moderate median emargination, impressed along apical margin, sha-
-greened; malar space 0. 85x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible
very shallowly concave; 18 flagellar segments; sense cones separated by the
width of a cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum short and inclined; thorax
shiny shagreened and largely impunctate, polished on speculum; prepectal
carina incomplete ventrally; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina large-
ly lacking; propodeum evenly shagreened, polished low on petiolar area; areo-
let lacking; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken below middle; 4
hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened and ob-
scurely punctate; setae lacking from external face of hind tibia; abdomen nar-
rowed from base of segment 3, rather strongly compressed from segment 5 to
apex; petiole length 1.5x width, shiny shagreened, lateral carina from spira-
cle to apex; segment 2 slightly wider than long, shiny shagreened; remainder
of abdomen shiny shagreened; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of
3; spiracle of segment 2 dorsad of suture, of segment 3 posterior to end of
suture; abdomen almost glabrous.
Black. Yellow on wide inner orbit reaching clypeus and malar space, cly-
peus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, anterior corners of scutellum, tegula,
tip of pronotal lobe, tip of proepisternum, prepectus, subtegular ridge, longi-
tudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum, mesepimeron; legs mostly rufous, yel-
low on fore and middle coxae and apical 0.5 of hind coxa, and all trochanters;
black on basal 0.5 of hind coxa; fuscous dorsally and apically on hind tibia,
hind tarsus; rufous on basal 0.5+ of abdominal segments 2, 3, 4, and 5, apical
margins of 2-5, lateral basal and apical spots on 6-8, ventral surface.
Male: Unknown.
This species is recognizable by the shape of the clypeus, the color of the
face, the wide face, the absence of the areolet, the even shagreening of the
body, the incomplete prepectal carina, the color of the abdomen, and the
compressed abdomen. :
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 37
| Type: 2, Desierto de los Leones, Distrito Federal, Mexico, at 2,900 m.,
Oct. 13, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
13. Homotropus interstinctus, new species
(Figure 25)
Female: 5.7mm. (5.3 mm.); head evenly shagreened and impunctate;
occipital carina broadly rounded medially; OOC 1.0x HO; face width 1. 75x
height; clypeus separated from face by a weak crease, width 1. 7x (1. 9x) height,
apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emargination, impressed along
apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0. 6x basal width of mandible; upper
tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 flagellar segments; sense cones
separated by more than the width of a cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum
short and inclined; thorax evenly shagreened, more polished on speculum; pre-
pectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina largely
lacking; propodeum evenly shagreened; areolet small, petiolate, second inter-
cubitus partially pigmented; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken be-
low middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora sha-
greened and obscurely punctate; few setae on external face of hind tibia; abdo-
men progressively narrowed from base of segment 3, moderately compressed
at apex; petiole length 1. 2x (1. 4x) width, shagreened, finely striate laterally,
margins divergent behind spiracles; segment 2 wider than long; abdomen even-
ly shagreened; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and base of 3; spiracle of seg-
ment 2 dorsad of suture, of 3 posterior to end of suture; abdomen mostly glab-
rous.
Black. Pale yellow on middle of face from clypeus to antennal fossae,
malar space, clypeus, mandible, scape and pedicel ventrally; palpi more dus-
ky; pale yellow on humeral bar, tegula, lateral margins of scutellum, tip of
pronotal lobe, dorsal spot on prepectus, subtegular ridge, wide stripe posteri-
orly on lower mesopleurum, mesepimeron; legs cream on fore and middle
coxae, all trochanters, annulus on medial 0. 3+ of hind tibia; rufous on rest of
fore and middle legs and hind femur; black on hind coxa, basal and apical 0. 3+
of hind tibia, and all of hind tarsus; rufous on apical 0.5 of abdominal segment
2, all of remaining segments except for small fuscous blotches ventro-lateral-
ly on segments 3, 4, and 5. The abdominal segments may be largely infusca-
ted, with the rufous evident only at the base, apex, and laterally on the seg-
ments.
Male: 5.2-5.4 mm.; face width 1. 7x height; clypeus width 2.1x height;
malar space 0. 7x basal width of mandible; OOC 0.9x HO; 20 flagellar seg-
ments; tyloids on flagellar segments 8-13; sense cones abundant, separated by
the width of a cone; hairs of flagellum short and erect; petiole length 1. 7x
width.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, lateral margins of scu-
tellum, posterior 0.6+4 of pronotal lobe, proepisternum, prepectus, subtegular
ridge, lower 0.5+ of mesopleurum, most of mesosternum, mesepimeron; legs
as infemale, except hind coxa cream with posterior black vertical stripe;
cream spot at basal corner of abdominal segment 2 and bands at base of each
of segments 3, 4, and 5, and on ventral surface. The metapleurum may also
be cream.
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
This species is recognizable by the even shagreening of the entire body,
the black and white banded hind tibia, the male tyloids on flagellar segments
8-13, the presence of the areolet, and the color of the female abdomen.
Type: 9, Nova Teutonia, Santa Catarina, Brazil, March 21, 1948, F.
Plaumann (Townes). |
Paratypes: 2c’, 19, Nova Teutonia, Santa Catarina, Brazil, May 22, 1948,
and June 18, 1946, F. Plaumann (Townes). o, 2, Nova Teutonia, 27911’ S.,
52° 23’ W., Brazil, at 300-500 m., Sept. 2 and 3, 1948, F. Plaumann
(Ottawa). |
14. Homotropus pacificus Cresson
(Figure 26)
Bassus macultfrons Holmgren, 1868. Eugenies Resa, Insecta p. 410. 9.
Type: 2, San Francisco, Calif. (Stockholm). Name preoccupied by
Cresson, 1865.
Bassus pactficus Cresson, 1878. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1878:376. 9.
Type: 9, California (Philadelphia).
Bassus xanthopsis Ashmead, 1890. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 12:440. oc.
Type: o, reared from syrphid, Alameda, Calif. (Washington).
Biology: Kamal, 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19: 727. - Kamal, 1939. Tech.
Scient. Serv. Bul. Min. Agr. Egypt 207: 21-23, 46-47, fig. 28-32 and 95.
Female: 4.4-5.0 mm.; head shiny shagreened, more polished and obscure-
ly punctate on gena; OOC 1.4-1. 7x HO; face width 1. 7-1. 9x height; clypeus
separated from face by a weak crease, width 1.9-2.1x height, apical lobes
rounded with a moderate median emargination, strongly impressed laterally
on apical lobes, shiny shagreened; malar space 0. 8-0. 9x basal width of man-
dible; upper tooth of mandible subtruncate; 18-19, rarely 20 flagellar seg-
ments, first segment length 4. 2-4. 8x width; flagellum covered with short in- |
clined hairs; thorax shiny shagreened, polished dorsally on mesopleurum, all
obscurely punctate; pleural carina partially lacking; propodeum bearing irreg-
ular lateral carina, basal area evenly shagreened, petiolar area roughly sha-
greened; wing lacking areolet; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae
and femora lightly shagreened and obscurely punctate; a few setae on external
face of hind tibia; abdomen progressively narrowed from base of segment 4 to
apex of abdomen, either strongly arched or compressed at apex; petiole short
rectangular, length 1.4-1.5x width, evenly shagreened, dorsal carinae pre-
sent only near base; segment 2 nearly as wide as long, weakly striate at base,
rest shagreened, polished at apex; remainder of abdomen progressively more
polished apically; abdomen lightly pubescent; epipleura distinct on segment 2
and basal 0.3 of 3, inflexed; spiracle posterior to end of suture on segment 3.
Black. Bright yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, round spot on face,
humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spot under each wing; legs black on
hind coxa and first trochanter, bases of fore and middle coxae; yellow on rest
of fore and middle coxae, rest of trochanters; rufous on rest of legs; dusky at
apex of hind tibia and all of hind tarsus; rufous on apex of abdominal segment
2 and most of 3, inflexed margins of 2 and 3, ventrally on 1-4. The abdominal
color is variable, the rufous sometimes occurring on all or part of segments
2-4, but often restricted to the base of segment 3.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae : 39
Male: 4.0-5.4 mm.; OOC 1.4-1.6x HO; face width 1.9-2.0x height; 19-
20, rarely 18 or 21 flagellar segments; tyloids on segments 7-14 or 15; hairs
of flagellum short and erect; abdomen rounded above, parallel margined,
gradually narrowed apically; petiole length 1.5-1.7x width; abdomen more
abundantly pubescent than in female.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space, inner or-
bit, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
tip of proepisternum, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron, prepectus, longi-
tudinal stripe low on mesopleurum; legs black on most of hind coxa; pale yel-
low at apex and angles of hind coxa, fore and middle coxae, all trochanters;
tawny on rest of fore and middle legs, hind tibia ventrally; rufous on hind fe-
mur; dusky dorsally and apically on hind tibia, all of hind tarsus; rufous on
apex of abdominal segment 2, all of 3 and 4; yellow at bases of segments 3-6,
and on inflexed and ventral surfaces. The abdomen may have the rufous re-
stricted to the apical edges of segments 2-4, with yellow basal bands on 3-6.
Specimens: 2, 5 miles northeast of Encantada, Baja California, Mexico,
at 9,000 ft., May 31, 1958, J. Powell (Albany, Calif.). 9, Ensenada, Baja
California, Mexico, June, 1952 (San Francisco). o&, Jalapa, Veracruz,
Mexico, Aug. 1-6, 1961, R. & K. Dreisbach (Dreisbach). 20, 55.5 km. west
of Mexico City, Mexico, Oct. 24, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). o, 10
miles west of Orizaba, Mexico, Dec. 31, 1940, G. Bohart (San Francisco).
32, Sierra San Pedro Martir, La Grulla, Baja California, Mexico, at 6,500
ft., May 28, 1958, J. Powell (Albany, Calif.).
This species occurs in Mexico and is widely distributed in the Canadian
and Transition zones of western North America.
15. Homotropus calvus, new species
(Figures 27 and 58)
Female: Unknown. ;
Male: 4.7 mm.; head shagreened; occipital carina rounded; OOC 1. 6x
HO; face width 1.5x height; clypeus separated from face by a weak crease,
width 2.2x height, apical lobes rounded with a very weak median emargination,
impressed along apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0. 9x basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible very shallowly concave; 22 flagellar seg-
ments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-10; sense cones separated by more than
the width of a cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum short and erect; flagel-
lar segments long and slender, antenna longer than fore wing; thorax polished
and nearly impunctate; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina strong; propodeum evenly shagreened; areolet square, sessile,
second intercubitus unpigmented; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus bro-
ken far below middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and fe-
mora shagreened and obscurely punctate; setae lacking on external face of
hind tibia; abdomen slender, gradually tapered behind segment 4; petiole
length 1. 8x width, shagreened with a few weak longitudinal striae, a lateral
carina from spiracle to apex; segment 2 wider than long, shagreened; remain-
der of abdomen shagreened, progressively more polished apically; epipleura
distinct on segments 2, 3, and base of 4; spiracles dorsad of sutures; pubes-
cence of abdomen short and sparse, heavier at apex.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, tiandibte, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
subtegular ridge, ventral spots on prepectus, upper 0.5 of mesepimeron;
black on basal 0.5 of hind coxa and on first hind trochanter; yellow on remain-
der of coxae and trochanters; tawny-rufous on rest of legs; dusky on ventral
stripe on fore femur, dorsal stripe on fore tibia, dorsally on fore tarsus, dor-
sal stripes on middle femur, tibia, and tarsus, dorsally and basally on hind
femur, dorsal stripe and apically on hind tibia, and hind tarsus; yellow on
apical margins of abdominal segments 2-6, basal bands on segments 3-5, on
epipleura, and ventrally.
This species may be recognized by the small number of male tyloids, the .
polished thorax, the presence of an areolet, the long flagellum, and the evenly
shagreened propodeum and abdomen.
Type: 0, Km. 185.5, Tuxtepec-Oaxaca Rd., Oaxaca, Mexico, at 2,200
m., Oct. 22, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
16. Homotropus chilensis, new species
(Figure 28)
Female: 4.8 mm. (4.6 mm.); head shagreened, more polished on frons
and gena, obscurely punctate on gena; occipital carina rounded medially; OOC
1.55x HO; face width 1. 6x height; clypeus separated from face by a weak
crease, width 1. 8x (1. 6x) height, apical lobes weakly rounded with a very shal-
low median emargination, impressed along apical margin, shagreened; malar
space 0. 8x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtrun-
cate; 20 (19) flagellar segments; sense cones separated by more than the width
of a cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum short and inclined; thorax partly
polished, lightly shagreened on medial band on mesoscutum, on pronotum, low
on mesopleurum, and on metapleurum, finely punctate laterally and anteriorly
on mesoscutum, anteriorly and ventrally on mesopleurum; prepectal carina
complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina strong; propodeum lack-
ing carinae, shagreened basally, more rugulose laterally and on petiolar area;
areolet square, sessile, second intercubitus pigmented; nervulus opposite ba-
sal vein; nervellus broken below middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slen-
der; coxae and femora lightly shagreened and obscurely punctate; few setae on
external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed
from segment 4 to apex; petiole length 1.6x width, shagreened, finely striate
laterally; segment 2 slightly wider than long, shagreened and weakly striate
basally and laterally; remainder of abdomen shagreened, more polished apical-
ly; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.5 of 3; spiracles dorsad of su-
tures.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, tegula, tip of
pronotal lobe, spots at bases of fore and hind wings, longitudinal stripe on
lower mesopleurum; legs tawny-rufous; yellow on fore and middle coxae,
posteriorly and apically on hind coxa and all trochanters; black at base, an-
teriorly, and mesally on hind coxa. :
Male: 4.4-5.3 mm. ; face width 1. 7-1. 8x height; clypeus width 2.0-2.2x
height; malar space 0.9-1.1x basal width of mandible; 20-21 flagellar seg-
ments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-14 (16); hairs on flagellum short and
erect; petiole length 1. 7-1. 9x width.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; flagellum tawny ventrally; yellow
on humeral bar, tegula, proepisternum, posterior 0.5+ of pronotal lobe, pre-
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 41
pectus, lower 0.5 of mesopleurum, mesosternum, subtegular ridge, tip of
mesepimeron; legs as in female, but hind coxa yellow, or black reduced to
base; yellow on basal bands on segments 3, 4, 5, and 6, sometimes a median
line on 2, 3, and 4. Occasionally the apical margin of segments 6 and 7 are
yellow.
This species is recognizable by the narrow lobes of the clypeus, the pat-
tern of the mesoscutal sculpturing, the presence of the areolet, and the color
of the legs and abdomen.
Type: 9, Santiago, Chile, 1943, E. Herrera (Townes).
Paratypes: 20’, Bahia Municiones, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 10, 1960,
L. Pena (Townes). ¢, Dalcahue, Chiloe Island, Chile, Jan. 17-Feb. 14,
1962, L. Peha (Townes). o, Laguna Amargo, Natales, Magallanes, Chile,
Dec. 14-21, 1960, L. Pena (Townes). 20°, 19, Santiago, Chile, 1943, E.
Herrera (Townes). o, Santiago, Chile, Oct. 28, 1951, L. Pena (Ottawa). 20,
Valparaiso, Chile, Oct. 15, 1900, P. Herbst (Cambridge).
17. Homotropus dolichus, new species
(Figures 29 and 56)
Female: 7.6 mm.; head shiny shagreened; occipital carina narrowly
rounded medially; vertex impressed medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face width 1. 55x
height; clypeus separated from face by a shallow crease, width 1. 6x height,
apical margin truncate, lacking median emargination, shagreened; malar space
1.0x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible very shallowly concave;
21 flagellar segments, segments very slender, first segment length 8. 3x width;
sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone; hairs of flagellum
short and inclined; thorax very narrow, length 2.25x width of mesoscutum; pol-
ished on mesoscutum with a very faint shagreen; more evidently shagreened
over rest of thorax; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina lacking; propodeum evenly shagreened; areolet lacking; nervu-
lus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken above middle; 3 hamuli on costellan
fold; legs slender; coxae and femora evenly shagreened; setae lacking from
external face of hind tibia; petiole long and slender, compressed from base of
segment 2, strongly compressed from 3 to apex; petiole length 2.0x width,
evenly shagreened, margins parallel behind spiracles; remainder of abdomen
mostly polished and glabrous; epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3; spiracles
dorsad of sutures. |
Black. Dusky rufous on edge of mandible, maxillary palpus, and antenna;
labial palpus more tawny; rufous on tegula, scutellum, postscutellum, meso-
pleurum, mesosternum, prepectus, metapleurum, and propodeum; legs most-
ly rufous; more dusky on middle tarsus, hind first trochanter, femur, tibia,
and tarsus; rufous on apical 0.7 of petiole, segment 2 except at base, apical
0.5 of 3, laterally and ventrally on 4 and 5.
Male: Unknown.
This species is distinguishable by the clypeal shape, the elongate first
flagellar segment, the polished mesoscutum, the slender thorax, the lack of
the areolet, the rufous markings of the thorax, and the strongly compressed
abdomen.
Type: 92, Nova Teutonia, Santa Catarina, Brazil, Aug. 19, 1952, F.
Plaumann (Townes).
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
18. Homotropus macrogaster, new species
(Figure 30)
Female: 5.9 mm. (6.9 mm.); head shagreened; occipital carina rounded;
frons medially sulcate anterior to fore ocellus; OOC 1.75x HO; face width 1. 8x
(2.0x) height; clypeus separated from face by a shallow crease, width 2.0x
height, apical lobes rounded with a moderate median emargination, impressed
along apical margin, shagreened; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible;
upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 19 flagellar segments; sense
cones slender, separated by about the width of a cone, conspicuous; hairs on
flagellum short and inclined; thorax mostly polished, some shagreen on poste-
rior mesoscutum, lower mesopleurum, and on pronotum, closely and deeply
punctate on mesoscutum, more finely on lower mesopleurum and mesosternum,;
propodeum with partial weak lateral carina, shagreened dorsally and on petio-
lar area, more scabrous laterally; areolet square, second intercubitus pig-
mented; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken below middle; ramellus
present; 3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened
and obscurely punctate; no setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen long
and slender, length equal to fore wing length, compressed at apex; apical mar-
gins of terga transverse or convex; petiole length 1.55x width, shagreened,
margins slightly convergent posteriorly; segment 2 length 1. 4x width; segment
3 slightly longer than wide; abdomen shagreened and almost glabrous; epipleura
distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.4 of 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures.
Black. Yellow on clypeus and mandible; palpi more dusky; yellow on hu-
meral bar and tegula; legs mostly rufous; slightly more dusky on canes Some-
times the tip of the scutellum is rufous.
Male: Unknown.
This species may be distinguished by its very elongate abdomen, strongly
punctate mesoscutum, rufous legs, and the short first abscissa of cubitus.
Type: ¢, Los Robles, Magallanes, Chile, Jan. 22, 1961, T. Cehalovick
(Townes).
Paratype: 9, Rio Tres Pasos, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 11, 1960, T.
Cehalovick (Townes).
19. Homotropus alternatus, new species
(Figure 31)
Female: 4.8 mm.; head lightly shagreened, obscurely punctate on gena;
occipital carina transverse medially; OOC 2.25x HO; frons medially sulcate
before fore ocellus; face width 1. 7x height, slightly narrowed ventrally, weak-
ly protuberant medially; clypeus separated from face by a weak crease, width
2.1x height, apical lobes rounded with a shallow median emargination, strongly
impressed along apical margin, lightly shagreened; malar space 0. 5x basal
width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 19 flagellar
segments; sense cones separated by the width of a sense cone, inconspicuous;
hairs on flagellum dense, short and erect; thorax polished with sparse fine
puncturing; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural
carina weak; propodeum polished dorsally, weakly rugulose and shagreened on
petiolar area; wing areolet small, square, sessile, second intercubitus unpig-
mented; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken slightly below middle;
discoidella straight on basal 0.5, then with a weak anterior curvature before
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 43
continuing to wing margin; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; lightly sha-
greened and obscurely punctate on coxae and femora; no setae on external face
of hind tibia; abdomen progressively narrowed from segment 3 to apex; petiole
length 1.5x width, shagreened and finely striate longitudinally, moderately
elevated on posterior 0.25; segment 2 slightly longer than wide, finely striate
at base and remainder shagreened; progressively more polished to apex of ab-
domen; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and base of 3; spiracles dorsad of su-
tures; abdomen nearly glabrous.
Black. Cream-yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, humeral bar, tegula,
tip of pronotal lobe, and tip of mesepimeron; legs mostly fuscous; cream-
yellow on fore and middle coxae except at base, apex of hind coxa, fore and
middle trochanters, anteriorly on fore femur and tibia, apices of middle and
hind femora, ventrally at base of middle and hind tibiae, and apex of middle
tibiae cream-yellow baso-laterally on petiole and on apical margin of seg-
ments 2-7, epipleura, and ventral surface.
Male: Unknown.
This species is recognizable by the polished thorax, the color of the legs
and abdomen, the transverse occipital carina, and the large OOC/HO ratio.
Type: 9, Banos, Ecuador, at 1,800 m., July 8, 1938, W. Clarke-Mc-
Intyre (Townes).
20. Homotropus furvus, new species
(Figure 32)
Female: 5.0 mm.; head lightly shagreened, obscurely punctate on gena;
occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 2.0x HO; face width 1. 6x height,
slightly narrowed ventrally; clypeus separated from face by a weak crease,
width 2.4x height, apical lobes rounded with a shallow median emargination, _
strongly impressed along apical margin, lightly shagreened; malar space 0. 6x
basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 18
flagellar segments; Sense cones separated by the width of a sense cone, in-
conspicuous; hairs on flagellum dense, short and erect; thorax polished with
sparse fine puncturing; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow;
pleural carina weak; propodeum polished; wing areolet square, petiolate, sec-
ond intercubitus unpigmented; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken
at middle; discoidella straight on basal 0.7, then weakly curved posteriorly to
wing margin; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; polished and obscurely
punctate on coxae and femora; no setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen
compressed from base of segment 2, rather strongly compressed from seg-
ment 3 to apex; petiole length 1.9x width, polished except for few fine striae
laterally, moderately elevated on posterior 0.25; segment 2 length 1. 7x width,
polished, weakly striate at base; remainder of abdomen polished and glabrous;
epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
and tip of mesepimeron; legs mostly fuscous; yellow on fore and middle
coxae and trochanters, anteriorly on fore femur, apically on middle and hind
femora, ventrally on all tibiae at base; yellow on abdominal epipleura and
ventral surface.
Male: Unknown.
This species is most closely related to alternatus. It differs in the pol- ©
ished propodeum and petiole, the petiolate areolet, the compressed abdomen,
4A Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
the absence of the humeral bar and apical abdominal bands, the nervellus bro-
ken at the middle, the shape of the discoidella, and the more slender petiole.
Type: 9, Bahos, Ecuador, 1,800 m., July 8, 1938, W. Clarke-MclIntyre |
(Townes).
21. Homotropus lissosoma, new species
(Figure 33)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 4.2 mm. (4.8 mm.); head shiny shagreened; occipital carina sharp-
ly angulate medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face width 1. 5x (1. 6x) height, slightly nar-
rowed ventrally; clypeus separated ‘from face by a weak crease, width 2. 6x
(2.4x) height, apical lobes rounded with a shallow median emargination,
strongly impressed along apical margin, polished; malar space 0. 7x (0. 8x)
basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible shallowly bidentate; 20 fla-
gellar segments; tyloids on segments 7-14; sense cones separated by slightly
more than the width of a cone, inconspicuous; hairs on flagellum short and
erect; thorax polished and largely impunctate; prepectal carina complete;
mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina low; propodeum with strong lateral
carina and an arching transverse carina between basal and petiolar areas,
shagreened on lateral area, rest polished; wing areolet lacking or partially
indicated; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken well below middle;
3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; polished on coxae and lightly sha-
greened on femora; no setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded
dorsally, gradually narrowed apically; petiole length 1. 4x (1. 6x) width, sha-
greened; segment 2 length subequal to width, striate and weakly shagreened;
segment 3 striate on basal 0.3; remainder of abdomen lightly shagreened, pro-
gressively more polished apically; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal
0.3 of 3; spiracle of 2 dorsad of suture, of 3 posterior to end of suture.
Black. Yellow on face, clypeus, mandible, palpi, small humeral bar,
tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, and tip of mesepimeron; yellow on fore and mid-
dle coxae and trochanters, second hind trochanter, and ventrally on all tibiae;
black on hind coxa and first trochanter, basal 0.6 of hind femur, dorsally and
apically on hind tibia; dusky on dorsal stripe on fore and middle femora and
tibiae and all tarsi; remainder of legs tawny-rufous; reddish on apical mar-
gins of abdominal segments 2, 3, and 4, and a narrow medial stripe on 3 and
4. :
This species is recognizable by the polished thorax and propodeum, the
transverse propodeal carina between the basal and petiolar areas, the stria-
tions on abdominal segment 2, the color of the legs and abdomen, the angulate
occipital carina, _and the absence of the wing areolet.
Type: &, Bafios, Ecuador, 2,500 m. eitay 6, 1939, W. Clarke-MaclIntyre
(Townes).
Paratype: o, same data as type (Townes).
22. Homotropus masoni, new species
(Figure 34)
Female: 4.2 mm.; head evenly shagreened, more polished on gena; occi-
pital carina narrowly rounded medially; vertex impressed medially; OOC 1.1x
HO; face width 1.95x height, slightly widened ventrally; clypeus separated
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 45
from face by a weak crease, width 1. 7x height, apical margin truncate, lack-
ing median emargination, surface flattened, lightly shagreened; malar space
1.2x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible weakly concave; 22 fla-
gellar segments; sense cones sparse, Separated by more than the width of a
cone, segments 10 to apex flattened ventrally, devoid of sense cones, and
covered with a very short dense pile; thorax lightly shagreened and nearly im-
punctate; prepectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural cari-
na very low; propodeum lacking carinae, shagreened; areolet lacking; nervu-
lus far distad of basal vein; basal vein straight; nervellus broken well below
middle; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened
and obscurely punctate; no setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen roun-
ded dorsally, compressed at apex; petiole length 1. 25x width, evenly sha-
greened; segment 2 slightly wider than long, thyridium rather deep and wide;
abdomen evenly shagreened and nearly glabrous; epipleura distinct on segment
2 and base of 3; spiracle dorsad of suture on tergite 2, posterior to end of su-
ture on 3. |
Black. Cream on narrow inner orbital bar, small spot in malar space,
clypeus, mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; dark brown on flagel-
lum; cream on long recurved humeral bar, tegula, most of scutellum and post-
scutellum, proepisternum, prepectus, wide longitudinal stripe on lower meso-
pleurum, and most of metapleurum; rufous on remainder of thorax and propo-
deum; legs extensively cream; fuscous on lateral spot on hind coxa, first hind
trochanter, narrow apical dorsal stripes on all femora, ventral stripe on
middle femur, basal annulus on hind femur, dorsal stripes on fore and middle
tibiae, basal and apical bands and dorsal spot on medial white annulus on hind
tibia, and all tarsi; abdomen cream ventrally.
Male: Unknown.
This is a highly distinctive species. It is recognizable by the shape of the
clypeus, the absence of the areolet, the straight basal vein and distal position
of the nervulus, the flattened ventral surface of the distal half of the flagellum,
the lack of sense cones, and the color of the legs and thorax.
Type: 9, Nova Teutonia, 279 11’ S., 52° 23’ W., Brazil, at 300-500 m.,
Jan. 13, 1960, F. Plaumann (Ottawa).
23. Homotropus trachysoma, new species
(Figure 35)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 5.3 mm. (5.0 mm.); head shagreened and obscurely punctate;
occipital carina rounded medially; vertex not impressed medially; OOC 1. 8x
(1. 6x) HO; face width 1. 8x (1. 6x) height, slightly widened ventrally; clypeus
separated from face by a weak crease, width 2. 3x (2. 5x) height, apical lobes
rounded with a shallow median emargination, strongly impressed along apical
margin, shagreened; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of
mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 (20) flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar
segments 7-14; sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone; thorax
heavily shagreened except on speculum, heavily punctate on mesoscutum; pre-
pectal carina complete; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural carina low; pro-
podeum lacking carinae, coarsely shagreened, more polished low on petiolar
area; areolet present, square, sessile, second intercubitus unpigmented; ner-
vulus slightly distad of basal vein; nervellus broken at middle; 3 hamuli on
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
costellan fold; legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened and obscurely punc-
tate; few setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen rounded dorsally, grad-
ually narrowed at apex; petiole length 1. 6x (1. 7x) width, coarsely shagreened;
segment 2 length subequal to width; abdomen dull shagreened, progressively
more polished apically; epipleura distinct on segments 2 and 3; spiracles dor-
sad of lateral sutures. !
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape ventrally, humeral margins in front of tegula and re-
curved to posterior 0.2 of mesoscutum where they become wider, lateral mar-
gins and apex of scutellum (or entirely), tegula, proepisternum, tip of pronotal
lobe, subtegular ridge, prepectus, lower 0.4+ of mesopleurum, and mesepi-
meron; mesosternum rufous or yellow; legs yellow on fore and middle coxae,
apically and posteriorly on hind coxa, fore and middle and second hind trochan-
ter, and ventrally at base of hind tibia; fuscous on rest of hind coxa and hind
first trochanter; rufous on rest of fore and middle legs and hind femur; dusky
at base of hind femur, dorsally and apically on hind tibia, hind tarsus and
apically on fore and middle tarsi; abdomen may be yellow at apex of petiole and
basally on segments 3, 4, and 5.
This species is recognizable by the coarse shagreening and puncturing of
the mesoscutum, the long recurved humeral bars, and the color of the legs.
Type: o, Pichinahuel, Cordillera Nahuelbuta, Arauco, Chile, at 1, 100-
1,400 m., Jan. 1-10, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa).
Paratypes: 20°, Peillem-Pilli, Cordillera Nahuelbuta, Arauco, Chile, at
600-800 m., Jan. 19, 1954, L. Pena (Ottawa).
3. Genus SYRPHOCTONUS
(Figure 66)
Syrphoctonus Foerster, 1868. Verh. Naturh. Ver. Preuss. Rheinlande 25:
162. Type: Bassus biguttatus Gravenhorst. Designated by Viereck, 1914.
Length 3.7-8.2 mm.; head width 1. 20-1. 35x height; face width 1. 6-2. 4x
height, shagreened, obscurely punctate or impunctate, widened ventrally; cly-
peus width 1. 7-2. 75x height, separated from face by a weak crease, basal
margin elevated, apical margin weakly lobed or subtruncate, shallowly emar-
ginate medially, flattened with a median vertical sulcus; 18-25 flagellar seg-
ments; antenna subequal to wing length; sense cones usually separated by less
than the width of a cone; tyloids lacking; first flagellar segment length 3. 8-5. 0x
greatest diameter; vertex usually not impressed medially; occipital carina
rounded or angulate medially; OOC 0.9-1. 8x HO; malar space 0.9-1.4x basal
width of mandible; female face not marked with yellow inner orbits; thorax
length 1. 8-2.1x width of mesoscutum, shagreened; notaulus lacking; prepectal
carina complete; sternaulus shallow; mesosternal suture shallow; propodeum
lacking carinae, shagreened; wing areolet lacking; nervulus distad of basal
vein; nervellus broken below middle; 2-3 hamuli on costellan fold; second ab-
_scissa of subdiscoideus slightly shorter than first abscissa; hind tibia slightly
longer than thorax length; inner spur on hind tibia 0.5-0.67x length of hind
basitarsus; hind tibia usually with many setae on lateral surface; abdomen
rounded dorsally and tapered apically; caudal margin of each tergum transverse
or slightly convex; petiole in dorsal view short rectangular, dorsal carinae
lacking; second and third segments wider than long; epipleura distinct on seg-
ment 2 and basal 0.5+ of 3; spiracles usually dorsad of sutures.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 47
Key to the Neotropic species of Syrphoctonus
Females
(Females of concavus, paulus, hidalgoensis,
and caccabatus are unknown. )
Abdomen extensively marked with yellow from segment 3 to.apex; hind
coxa partially blackened’... . ... . +... 5. flavicauda, new species
Abdomen Diack: bind Coxe rulous. 5 es ie eae, a se ete ae ee 2
Hind tibia white at base, black on remainder of length; clypeus usually
black; face width 2.1-2.3x height; stigma black ventrally.
1. flavolineatus Gravenhorst
Hind tibia entirely dusky-rufous; clypeus yellow-rufous; face width 1. 7-
1.9x height; stigma white ventrally. 2. erythromelas, new species
Males
Head strongly concave behind ocelli; OOC 0.9x HO; mesoscutum polished
and obscurely shagreened; scutellum yellow on lateral and apical mar-
Sins kG ee a eee 6. concavus, new species
Head not strongly concave behind ocelli; OOC 1.2-1. 8x HO; mesoscutum
strongly shagreened; scutellum black, or yellow at apex. ...... 2
Abdomen extensively marked with yellow from segment 2 or 3 to apex;
hind femur extensively colored with pale yellow.
5. flavicauda, new species
Abdomen black, occasionally spotted or banded with yellow at bases of
medial segments: hind femur rufous or black. ..0600 2 3
Legs entirely black; face marked with black and yellow.
7. caccabatus, new species
Legs marked with rufous or yellow; face entirely yellow........ “
Hind tibia dusky rufous; hind coxa rufous; prepectus and usually most of
mesopleurum black; face punctate. . . 2. erythromelas, new species
Hind tibia pale at base and sometimes ventrally, remainder black; hind
coxa black and yellow or mostly yellow; prepectus and mesopleurum ex-
tensively marked with yellow; face impunctate ............ 5
Discoidella lacking; hind femur fuscous at base and apex and rufous medial-
ly; humeral bar lacking; size 3.5-3.8 mm. 4. paulus, new species
Discoidella strong; hind femur rufous and yellow; humeral bar usually
present; size 5.1-6. 8 mim. oe ae ee 6
Hind coxa mostly rufous and yellow; lower mesopleurum and mesosternum
yellow; face width 2.3-2.4x height; petiole length 1. 3-1. 4x width.
1. flavolineatus Gravenhorst
Hind coxa extensively blackened; a yellow stripe on lower mesopleurum,
black on mesosternum; face width 1. 9x height; petiole length 1. 8x width.
3. hidalgoensis, new species
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
1. Syrphoctonus flavolineatus Gravenhorst
(Figure 36)
Bassus flavolineatus Gravenhorst, 1829. Ichneum. Europeae 3:337. 92. Type:
2, Netley, England (lost). 7
Bassus interruptus Holmgren, 1856. Svenska Vet. -Akad. Handl. (n.s.) 1: 359.
o. Type: o, Sweden (Stockholm).
Bassus bimaculatus Holmgren, 1856. Svenska Vet. Ss Handl. (n.s.) 1:
360. o. Type: o, Sweden (Stockholm).
Bassus agilis Cresson, 1868. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 2:111. o%. Type: ¢&,
Illinois (Philadelphia). |
Bassus frontalis Cresson, 1868. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 2:111. 2. Type:
2, Illinois (Philadelphia).
Mesoleius junctus Provancher, 1883. Nat. Canad. 14:10. ‘‘o’’=9. Type: Q,
Quebec (Quebec).
Female: 3.7-5.7 mm.; head shagreened, obscurely punctate on face and
gena; OOC 1.3-1.5x HO; face width 2.1-2.3x height, moderately widened
ventrally; clypeus width 1.9-2.5x height, apical lobes weakly rounded with a
shallow median emargination, flattened with a median vertical sulcus, sha-
greened; malar space 0.9-1.1x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandi-
ble truncate; 21-25 flagellar segments, first segment length 3.5-5.0x width;
sense cones separated by the width of a cone, abundant on segment one, con-
spicuous; flagellum covered with a short dense pile; thorax shagreened, pol-
ished posteriorly on mesopleurum, obscurely punctate on mesoscutum, pre-
pectus, low on mesopleurum, and on mesosternum; pleural carina indistinct;
propodeum lacking carinae, evenly shagreened; 2-3 hamuli on costellan fold;
legs slender; coxae and femora shagreened and obscurely punctate; numerous
setae on external face of hind tibia; hind tibia apically compressed; abdomen
rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed apically; petiole stout rectangular,
length 1.2-1.5x width, margins slightly divergent behind spiracles, sha-
greened, submedian carinae from base to middle; segment 2 much wider than
long, strongly striate basally; rest of abdomen shagreened, more polished
apically, weakly striate at base of segment 3; abdomen sparsely pubescent;
epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.7 of 3, inflexed.
Black. Cream-yellow medially on mandible, palpi, median spot on face,
humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron,
tips of scutellum and postscutellum, and capillary lines between wings; wings
dusky hyaline; legs largely rufous; paler on fore trochanters; dusky basally on
fore coxa, fore and middle tarsi; fuscous on hind tibia, except at base, and
hind tarsus; cream at base of hind tibia.
Occasionally the following variations occur: scutellum and postscutellum
black; face black; faintly rufous on thoracic pleura; tawny at base of third ab-
dominal segment; rufous tinge along apical margins of median abdominal seg-
ments; and humeral bar reduced or lacking.
Male: 5.1-6.5 mm.; OOC 1.3-1.4x HO; face width 2.3-2.4x height, much
widened ventrally; clypeus width 2.3x height; malar space 1.1-1.2x basal
width of mandible; 21-24, rarely 19, 20, or 25 flagellar segments; tyloids
lacking; hairs of flagellum short and inclined dorsally, largely lacking ven-
trally; sense cones very abundant, closer together than the width of a cone;
petiole length 1.3-1.4x width; numerous short hairs scattered over abdomen.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 49
Black. Lemon-yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, malar space and
lower gena, inner orbit, antenna ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, apical spot
on scutellum, tip of postscutellum, capillary lines between wings, proepister-
num, posterior margin of pronotal lobe, spot under fore wing, mesepimeron,
prepectus, mesosternum, and lower 0.5 of mesopleurum; legs paler than in fe-
male; lemon-yellow on all coxae and trochanters, fore and middle femora, ven-
trally on tibiae and tarsi, ventrally on hind femur, basally and ventrally on
hind tibia; rufous posteriorly on hind coxa, most of hind femur; dusky dorsally —
on fore and middle tibiae and tarsi; fuscous on most of hind tibia and all of hind
tarsus; cream spots or bands at bases of abdominal segments 3-7, ventrally on
median area.
Specimens: 2, Ambuto, Ecuador, at 2,600 m., Dec., 1956, J. Foerster
(Ottawa). 9, San Pedro Iturbide, 32+ km. west of Linares, Mexico, Oct. 26,
1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). |
This species occurs in the Hudsonian, Canadian, Transition, and Upper
Austral zones of the Nearctic region, the Neotropic region, as well as in
Europe and Asia.
2. Syrphoctonus erythromelas, new species
(Figures 37, 59, and 64)
Female: 4.0 mm. (4.3 mm.); head shagreened, more polished on gena,
finely punctate on face, more obscurely on gena; gena not inflated; occipital
carina rounded medially; OOC 1. 3x (1. 6x) HO; face width 1. 7x (1. 9x) height,
parallel margined; clypeus width 1. 8x (2.0x) height, apical margin truncate,
with a median vertical sulcus, shagreened; malar space 1. 0x basal width of
mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 flagellar segments;
sense cones abundant, separated by more than the width of a cone; thorax sha-
greened, more polished around speculum; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural
carina well developed; propodeum shagreened; nervulus far distad of basal
vein; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; legs stout; coxae and femora shagreened and
obscurely punctate; abdomen rounded dorsally, progressively narrowed apical-
ly; petiole length 1. 2x (1.0x) width, shagreened with some weak longitudinal
striations; segment 2 wider than long, shagreened and finely striate; segment
3 shagreened and striate on basal 0.5; rest of abdomen largely polished; epi-
pleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3; spiracle of segment 2 dorsad
of suture, of segment 3 posterior to end of suture.
Black. Cream on mandible and palpi; yellow-rufous on clypeus; rufous on
flagellum; pale yellow on tegula, faint humeral bar, tip of pronotal lobe, tip
of mesepimeron, stigma ventrally and most veins ventrally; legs largely ru-
fous, more dusky apically on hind tibia and on hind tarsus.
Male: 4.7 mm. ; face width 1. 8-1.9x height; clypeus width 2.0-2.2x height;
malar space 1.0-1.1x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.2-1.3x HO; 21 flagellar
segments; sense cones separated by less than the width of a cone; petiole
length 1.1-1.3x width. :
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi, scape and pedicel ventrally; thcrax as in female but usually with yellow on
the humeral bar, a spot on the mesopleurum before middle coxa, more or less
of the prepectus, and the tip of the proepisternum.
This species is recognizable by the rufous hind tibia, the striations on the
first 3 abdominal segments, the dark color of the thorax, the punctations on
50 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
the face, the pale color ventrally on the stigma, and the abundance of setae on
the hind tibia.
Type: 2, Tolhuaca, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 8- He 1962, L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 30%, 19, Butamalal, Arauco, Chile, Feb. 12 and 21, 1953, L.
Pena (Ottawa). o’, Bahia Municiones, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 10, 1960, L.
Pena (Townes). 9, Caramavida, Arauco, Chile, Dec. 31, 1953, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 30%, 19, El Coigo, Curico, Chile, Oct. and Nov., 1959, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 9, Las Cabras, Chile, at 1,100 m., Dec. 10-23, 1954, L. Pena
(Ottawa). o%, 9, Las Trancas, Nuble, Chile, Jan. 17, 1953, and March 9,
1952, L. Pena (Ottawa). 30%, 29, Pichinahuel, Cordillera Nahuelbuta, Arauco,
Chile, at 1,100-1,400 m., Jan. 31, 1954, Feb. 12, 1953, and Dec. 23-31,
1958, L. Pena (Ottawa). o, 9, Tolhuaca, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 8-11, 1962,
L. Pena (Townes). |
3. Syrphoctonus hidalgoensis, new species
(Figure 38)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 5.2 mm.; head shiny shagreened; gena slightly inflated; occipital
carina rounded medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face width 1.9x height, widened ven-
trally; clypeus width 2.x height, apical margin truncate, with a median verti-
cal sulcus, shagreened; malar space 1.1x basal width of mandible; upper tooth
of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 flagellar segments; sense cones very
abundant, closer together than the width of a cone; hairs on flagellum sparse,
short and erect; thorax shiny shagreened; pleural carina low; propodeum even-
ly shagreened, more polished low on petiolar area; nervulus distad of basal
vein; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; coxae and femora weakly shagreened and ob-
scurely punctate; a few weak setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen even-
ly shagreened, more polished apically; petiole length 1. 8x width; second seg-
ment length subequal to width; abdomen sparsely pubescent; epipleura distinct
on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3; spiracle of 2 dorsad of suture, of 3 posterior
to end of suture. ee
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, antenna ventrally, large humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal
lobe, tip of proepisternum, prepectus, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, longi-
tudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum; black on hind coxa except for apex; fus-
cous posteriorly and at apex of hind tibia, hind tarsus, posterior stripe on fore
and middle femora and tibiae; hind femur rufous; rest of legs yellow; yellow on
2 small spots at base of segment 3, band at base of segment 4, and ventral
surface.
This species is distinctive in its black hind coxa and the yellow stripe on
the mesopleurum.
=f e: o, Hidalgo National Park, State of Mexico, Mexico, at 3,000 m.
Oct. ~ 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
4, Syrphoctonus paulus, new species
(Figure 39)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 3.5 mm. (3.8 mm.); head shagreened, more polished and obscurely
punctate on gena; gena not inflated; vertex shallowly impressed medially;
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae D1
occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1. 25x (1. 4x) HO; face width 1. 6x
height, slightly widened ventrally; clypeus width 1.9x height, apical margin
truncate, with a weak median vertical sulcus, lightly shagreened; malar space
1.3x (1.1x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtrun-
- cate; 20 (18) flagellar segments; sense cones very abundant, closer together
than the width of a cone; thorax shagreened, more polished on speculum and
pronotal lobe; pleural carina low; propodeum evenly shagreened; discoidella
lacking; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; coxae and femora weakly shagreened and
obscurely punctate; no setae on external face of hind tibia; petiole length 1. 5x
(1.4x) width, a pair of submedian dorsal carinae arising at base and extending
to apex, shagreened with several longitudinal striae laterad of main carinae;
segment 2 length slightly greater than width, striate on basal 0.6 with some
light shagreen; remainder of abdomen polished; abdominal pubescence sparse;
epipleura distinct on segments 2, 3, and basal 0.5 of 4; spiracles dorsad of
sutures.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel and first flagellar segment ventrally, tegu-
la except for posterior fuscous spot, tip of pronotal lobe, tip of proepisternum,
subtegular ridge, prepectus, longitudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum, and
mesepimeron; mostly yellow on fore and middle legs, more dusky dorsally on
middle tibia and tarsus; yellow on hind coxa except for posterior fuscous ~
stripe; or mostly black on specimen from Ecuador; fuscous on hind trochan-
ters, base and apex of hind femur, apex of hind tibia, all of hind tarsus; most-
ly rufous on rest of hind femur and tibia.
This species is distinctive in the lack of the discoidella, the absence of
setae on the external face of the hind tibia, the longitudinal stripe on the male
mesopleurum, the lack of the humeral bar, and the color of the hind legs.
Type: o, Orizaba, Mexico, at 2,500 ft., Feb. 13, 1954, R. Dreisbach
(Townes). .
Paratypes: o’, Ambato, Ecuador, at 2,600 m., Dec., 1956, J. Foerster
(Ottawa). o%, Orizaba, Mexico, at 2,500 ft., Feb. 13, 1954, R. Dreisbach
(Townes). |
5. Syrphoctonus flavicauda, new species
(Figure 40)
Female: 5.5 mm. (7.3 mm.); head evenly shagreened, mostly impunc-
tate; gena not inflated; vertex very shallowly impressed medially; occipital
carina rounded medially; OOC 1. 8x (1. 6x) HO; face width 2. 0x (1. 9x) height,
widened ventrally; clypeus width 2.1x (2. 2x) height, apical margin truncate
with a median vertical sulcus, shagreened; malar space 1.1x (0. 9x) basal
width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 22 (23) fla-
gellar segments; sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone, con-
spicuous; thorax shagreened, more polished on speculum; obscurely punctate -
on anterior mesoscutum; pleural carina well developed; propodeum evenly sha-
greened; nervulus far distad of basal vein; nervellus broken well below middle;
3 hamuli on costellan fold; legs stout; coxae and femora shagreened and ob-
scurely punctate; few setae on external face of hind tibia; abdomen shagreened;
petiole length 1. 6x (1.4x) width, a strong lateral carina from spiracle to apex;
segment 2 slightly wider than long, striate medially at base; segment 3 striate
medially at base; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.6 of segment 3;
spiracles dorsad of sutures. :
52 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Black. Yellow on median facial spot, clypeus, mandible, palpi, very ©
small humeral bar, tip of scutellum, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular
ridge, tip of mesepimeron, longitudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum; stigma
whitish below, more dusky above; yellow on fore and middle coxae, except
fuscous at extreme bases; yellow at apex and angles of hind coxa, trochanters,
most of femora and tibiae except for dorsal dusky stripes; tarsi more dusky;
black on basal 0.7 of hind coxa; yellow-orange at apex of petiole, more or less
of remaining segments; irregular fuscous spotting on segments 2, 3, and 4.
One specimen from Punta Arenas has the thorax mostly blackened and the yel-
low-orange of the abdomen greatly reduced medially on each segment.
Male: 5.0-6.0 mm.; OOC 1.5x HO; 22-23 flagellar segments; sense cones
abundant, closer together than the width of a cone; petiole length 1. 65-1. 85x
width. :
Black. Cream-yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, cly-
peus, mandible, palpi, antenna ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, scutellum,
posterior 0.54 of pronotal lobe, most of proepisternum, subtegular ridge, pre-
pectus, lower 0.5+ of mesopleurum, most of mesosternum, mesepimeron,
spot on metapleurum; legs cream; dusky stripe on fore and middle femora and
all tibiae; dusky on all tarsi; yellow at apex of abdominal segment one, apical
0.5 of segments 2 and 3, and all of remaining segments. One specimen from
Los Robles has the yellow of the thorax somewhat reduced, the hind coxa par-
tially blackened, and the yellow on the abdomen reduced to the base and apex
of the segments.
This species is recognizable by the extensive yellow markings of the abdo-
men, the coloring of the legs, the coloring of the thorax, and the rather slen-
der petiole. |
Type: 2, Punta Arenas, Magallanes, Chile, Feb. 22, 1962,:T. Cehalovick
(Townes).
Paratypes: 2, Bio-Bio, Salto del Abanico, Chile, Dec. 30, 1950, Ross &
Michelbacher (San Francisco). o’, Los Robles, Magallanes, Chile, Jan. 22,
1961, T. Cehalovick (Townes). o, 9, Pichinahuel, Cordillera Nahuelbuta,
Arauco, Chile, Jan. 1-10, 1959; at 1,100-1,400 m., Jan. 31, 1954, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 9, 5 km. northwest of Punta Arenas, Chile, Feb. 26, 1959, J. F.
G. Clarke (Washington). o, Tolhuaca, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 8-11, 1962,
L. Pena (Townes). |
6. Syrphoctonus concavus, new species
(Figures 41 and 63)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 3.7 mm.; head evenly shagreened and impunctate on face and frons,
more polished and obscurely punctate on gena; vertex abruptly sloping imme-
diately behind ocelli, strongly concave medially; occipital carina rather angu-
late medially; OOC 0.9x HO; face width 1. 6x height, parallel margined; cly-
peus width 2. 75x height, apical margin truncate, median sulcus lacking, sha-
greened; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible
obliquely subtruncate; 20 flagellar segments; sense cones separated by more
than the width of a cone, inconspicuous; thorax shiny shagreened, very finely
on mesoscutum; pleural carina lacking; propodeum evenly shagreened; nervu-
lus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken well below middle; 2 hamuli on cos-
tellan fold; legs short and rather stout; coxae and femora shagreened; setae
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 53
lacking from external face of hind tibia; abdomen shagreened, more polished
apically; petiole length 1.5x width, a strong lateral carina from spiracle to
apex; segment 2 slightly wider than long; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and
basal 0.3 of segment 3; spiracles dorsad of sutures.
Black. Cream on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, palpi, scape
and pedicel ventrally, lateral and apical margins of scutellum, tegula, tip of
proepisternum, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, tip of mesepimeron,
prepectus, longitudinal stripe on lower mesopleurum; cream on fore and mid-
dle coxae and trochanters, apically and posteriorly on hind coxa, and second
hind trochanter; tawny-rufous on rest of fore and middle legs, apical 0.5 of
hind femur, ventrally on basal 0.5 of hind tibia; fuscous on rest of hind coxa,
basal 0.5 of hind femur, dorsally and apically on hind tibia, and hind tarsus.
This species is recognizable by the strong concavity on the rear of the
head, the nearly polished mesoscutum, the absence of a medial sulcus on the
clypeus, the widely spaced sense cones of the antenna, and the color of the
hind legs.
Type: o, Quincemil, near Marcapta, Peru, at 750 m., Sept. 1962, L.
Pena (Townes).
7. Syrphoctonus caccabatus, new species
(Figure 42)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 4.3 mm.; head roughly shagreened, obscurely punctate on gena;
gena not inflated; vertex shallowly impressed medially; occipital carina nar-
rowly rounded medially; OOC 1.55x HO; face width 1. 7x height, slightly wid-
ened ventrally; clypeus width 2.0x height, apical margin weakly lobed witha
very shallow median emargination, heavily shagreened; malar space 1. 0x
basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 fla-
gellar segments; sense cones separated by the width of a cone; thorax sha-
greened, more polished on speculum; pleural carina low; propodeum roughly
shagreened; discoidella present; 2 hamuli on costellan fold; coxae and femora
shagreened and obscurely punctate; few setae on external face of hind tibia;
petiole length 1.2x width, a weak medial depression extending to apex, sha-
greened, weakly rugulose laterally behind spiracle; segment 2 wider than long,
shagreened, weakly striate medially at extreme base; remainder of abdomen
shagreened, progressively more polished apically; abdominal pubescence
sparse; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3; spiracles dorsad of
sutures.
Black. Yellow on medial facial spot, triangular spot from lower orbit to
clypeus and into malar space, lower half of clypeus, and mandible; remainder
of head, thorax, abdomen, and legs black except yellow on apex of fore coxa
and on fore trochanters.
This species is recognizable by the extensive black coloration of the thorax,
abdomen, and legs, and the color pattern of the male face.
Type: o&, Chulumani, Yungas, Bolivia, at 1,700 m., Dec. 19-20, 1953,
L. Pena (Ottawa).
54 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
4. Genus PROMETHES
(Figure 67)
Promethes Foerster, 1868. Verh. Naturh. Ver. Preuss. Rheinlande 25: 162.
Type: Bassus sulcator Gravenhorst. Included by Woldstedt, 1877.
Liopsis Foerster, 1868. Verh. Naturh. Ver. Preuss. Rheinlande 25: 162.
Type: Bassus sulcator Gravenhorst. Designated by Viereck, 1912.
Promethus Thomson, 1890. Opusc. Ent. 14:1475. Emendation.
Length 4.0-10.2 mm.; head transverse, width 1.2-1.4x height, narrowed
on gena; face width 1.4-2.1x height, polished, usually impunctate, a pair of
submedian vertical depressions from clypeus to antennal fossae; clypeus width
1.6-2.1x height, separated from face by a shallow depression, elevated at
base, flattened to apical margin which is slightly upturned, apical lobes nar-
rowly rounded with a shallow median emargination, polished; 18-25 flagellar
segments, antenna subequal to, or shorter than wing length; sense cones usual-
ly separated by more than the width of a cone; tyloids present on male antenna,
various in number and distribution; length of first flagellar segment 3. 7-6. 0x
greatest diameter; occipital carina rounded medially; vertex shallowly, or not
impressed medially; malar space 0.6-1.2x basal width of mandible; face of fe-
male black on inner orbit; thorax length 1. 6-2.1x width of mesoscutum, pol-
ished and variably punctate; notaulus present and deep; prepectal carina com-
plete; sternaulus shallow; mesosternal suture shallow; propodeum strongly
carinate; wing areolet lacking; nervulus usually distad of basal vein; 1-4 hamu-
li on costellan fold; second abscissa of subdiscoideus much shorter than first
abscissa; inner spur on hind tibia 0.31-0.44x length of hind basitarsus; hind
tibia lacking setae on external face; hairs internally at apex of hind tibia usu-
ally flattened and scale-like; abdomen compressed apically, sometimes strong-
ly so; caudal margin of each tergum transverse or slightly convex; petiole in
dorsal view slender rectangular, length 1.4-2.2x width, dorsal carinae lacking
or weak; segment 2 longer than wide usually; epipleura distinct on segment 2
and more or less of 3; spiracle of segment 2 dorsad of suture, of segment 3
ventrad of suture in epipleurum. :
Promethes is most closely related to Sussaba. They differ by the following
points: Promethes has the clypeus weakly rounded on the apical lobes; the
notaulus is strongly developed; the spiracle of abdominal segment 2 is dorsad
of the lateral suture, and the spiracle of segment 3 is ventrad of the suture.
1. Promethes dolosus, new species
(Figures 43 and 60)
Female: 5.2 mm. (5.9 mm.); head polished, obscurely punctate on gena;
occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 0. 8x (0. 9x) HO; face width 1. 6x (1. 7x)
height, parallel margined; clypeus width 1. 8x (1. 7x) height, apical lobes round-
ed with a shallow median emargination, apical margin slightly upturned, pol-
ished; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible ob-
liquely subtruncate; 23 (22) flagellar segments; thorax polished, deeply and
closely punctate on mesoscutum, more obscurely punctate on rest of thorax,
except mostly impunctate around speculum; notaulus deep on basal 0.25 of
mesoscutum; prepectal carina complete; pleural carina strong; propodeum
mostly polished, bearing strong basal, lateral, and petiolar carinae; nervulus
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 20
opposite basal vein; nervellus broken at middle; one hamulus on costellan fold;
legs slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; hairs at apex
of hind tibia flattened scale-like; abdomen progressively narrowed from base
of segment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole slender, length 2.1x (1. 8x) width,
finely striate longitudinally, a weak lateral carina behind spiracle to apex; seg-
ment 2 longer than wide, finely striate on basal 0.4; remainder of abdomen
polished and almost glabrous; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0. 3 of
3. :
Black. Yellow on facial patch below antennal fossae, clypeus except for
dusky spots on lateral lobes, mandible, palpi, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
subtegular ridge; legs largely rufous, yellow on fore and middle coxae, apical
0.4 of hind coxa, all trochanters; black on basal 0.6 of hind coxa; dusky at
base and apex of hind tibia, apical 0.5-0.7 of hind basitarsus, and remaining
segments of hind tarsus; paler on medial portion of hind tibia and base of hind
basitarsus; rufous on thyridium, apical margin of segment 2, and basal corner
of 3. The apical margin of segment 3 and basal corners of 4 may be rufous.
Male: 4.7-6.0 mm.; clypeus width 1. 8-2.0x height; 21-23 flagellar seg-
ments; tyloids on flagellar segments 7-10; malar space 0. 8x basal width of
mandible; OOC 0.9-1.0x HO; nervellus broken at or below middle; petiole
length 2.1-2.4x width; abdominal segments from segment 5 to apex heavily
pubescent; segment 2 striate on basal 0.3-0. 7.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus, mandible, pal-
pi; thorax and legs as in female; rufous on thyridium and apical margins of
abdominal segments 2 and 3; yellow spots at basal corners of segments 3, 4,
and 5, or these united as basal bands.
This species is distinguished from the other species of Promethes by the
heavily punctate mesoscutum, the color of the hind legs, and the abdominal
color.
Type: 9, km. 185.5, Tuxtepec-Oaxaca Rd., Oaxaca, Mexico, at 2,200 m.,
Oct. 22, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
Paratypes: 40°, 19, Cerro Pelon, Oaxaca, 128 km. southwest of Tuxtepec,
Mexico, at 3,000 m., Oct. 22, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). 310%, 29,
km. 185.5, Tuxtepec-Oaxaca Rd., Oaxaca, Mexico, at 2,200 m., Oct. 22,
1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). :
5. Genus SUSSABA
(Figure 68)
Sussaba Cameron, 1909. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 19:728. Type:
(Sussaba bicarinata Cameron) = pulchella Holmgren. Monobasic.
Length 3.7-6.7 mm.; head transverse, width 1.15-1.4x height, narrowed
on gena; face width 1.5-2.1x height, polished except in ruzda, a pair of sub-
median vertical depressions from clypeus to antennal fossae; clypeus width
1.4-2.3x height, usually separated from face by a definite suture, elevated at
base, flattened to apical margin which is slightly upturned, apical lobes sub-
truncate or angulate, medially sulcate, usually polished; 18-24 flagellar seg-
ments, subequal to wing length; sense cones usually separated by more than
the width of a cone; tyloids present on male antenna, various in number and
distribution; length of first flagellar segment 2. 8-5. 3x greatest diameter; oc-
cipital carina rounded medially, but occasionally angulate; malar space 0. 7-
1. 6x basal width of mandible; face of female usually lacking yellow inner orbit;
56 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
thorax length 1. 75-2.2x width of mesonotum, polished and punctate or sha-
greened; notaulus lacking or replaced by a rugose line; prepectal carina com-
plete; sternaulus shallow or lacking; mesosternal suture shallow; pleural cari-
na strong; propodeum strongly carinate in most species; wing areolet lacking;
nervulus usually opposite, less often distad of, basal vein; nervellus broken
below the middle, seldom at the middle; one hamulus on costellan fold; second
abscissa of subdiscoideus much shorter than first abscissa; hind tibia usually
shorter than thorax length; inner spur of hind tibia 0.31-0.52x length of hind
basitarsus; hind tibia lacking setae on external face; hairs internally at apex
of hind tibia not flattened scale-like; abdomen rounded dorsally, usually apical-
ly compressed in female, sometimes strongly so; caudal margin of each ter-
gum transverse or slightly convex; petiole in dorsal view rectangular, length
1.2-2.5x width, dorsal carinae weak or lacking; abdominal segment 2 usually
wider than long, but longer than wide occasionally; epipleura distinct on seg-
ment 2 and base of 3; spiracles of abdominal segments 2 and 3 ventrad of
lateral sutures, in epipleura.
Sussaba is most closely related to Promethes, from which it may be dis-
tinguished by the following features: the clypeus is angulate or subtruncate
apically; the malar space tends to be relatively wider; the notaulus is lacking;
one hamulus occurs on the costellan fold of each wing; and the spiracles of ab-
dominal segments 2 and 3 lie in the epipleura ventrad of the lateral sutures.
Key to the Neotropic species of Sussaba
Females
(Females of callosa, flavopicta, and ruida are unknown. )
1. Abdomen red on most of segments 3 and 4; OOC 1.8-2.0x HO..... 2
Abdomen black, or black marked with yellow; OO0C 1.2-1.8x HO... 3
2. Abdominal segments 3 and 4 lacking yellow spots at basal corners; humeral
Dar Soa) OF laced ie ee 2. balteata, new species
Abdominal segments 3 and 4 with yellow spots at basal corners; humeral
VAT PA a a oe es 9. spilota, new species
3. Abdomen striate on most of segment 2 and on basal 0.3-0.6 of segment 3;
petiolar area of propodeum scabrous; mesoscutum coarsely punctate.
Pe ee ee Pe ye ee a ei Se ae
Abdomen striate on basal 0.5-0.7 of segment 2, smooth on segment 3;
petiolar area of propodeum shagreened; mesoscutum finely to obscurely
PUNCERCe se ce yp ee ON eee Dee es ee ee by She eee 6 5
4, Median facial spot small; humeral bar very small or absent; abdominal
segment 2 and basal 0.7 of 3 rather deeply striate; abdomen rufous
laterally and on apical margins of segments 2, 3, and 4; rufous on hind
tibia and hind tarsus; OOC 1.8x HO. .... 6. insculpta, new species
Median facial spot large; humeral bar large; abdominal segment 2 and
basal 0.3 of 3 weakly striate; abdomen yellow laterally and apically on
segments 3-7; fuscous on hind tibia dorsally and on hind tarsus; OOC
Pe ee I Oa eke ph tke a acs 7. sulfurea, new species
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 57
Propodeal carinae rather weak; inner orbit with broad yellow band; meso-
scutum finely punctate; hind coxa black at base, yellow at angles and
BCR Re ee ye OR es ry le te 3. rohweri Brues
Propodeal carinae strong; inner orbit with small yellow dot; mesoscutum
almost impunctate; hind coxa almost entirely black.
4. tertia, new species
Males
(The maie of spilota is unknown. )
Face black with yellow inner orbits and medial spot; coxae largely black.
C aoe Ce Somer aaa Seem Ye Secs SA DOTEN Suen Sania! aa Ariki! Oe, Yates ea Oia MS femme es eee aN tk Seareax Leeeod Gabe eons ada. cameyh Namo Se Me eas, Valais vee ble Seto “Sage eee Bares on”)
Face lightly shagreened; mesoscutum lightly shagreened; abdomen sha-
greened on segments 1-4; abdomen rufous on apical margins of segments
2, OF BBS CE eee ee er ae 8. ruida, new species
Face polished; mesoscutum mostly polished and punctate; abdomen various-
ly sculptured, but not shagreened on segments 1-4; abdomen black,
marked with yellow spots in Abit rufous on all of segments 2 and 3 in
DOERR OA EE OO ee on ee a ee a 3
Orbital bar wedge-shaped on lower 0.5 of eye; small humeral bar present;
hind femur blackened; scape yellow ventrally; mesoscutum sparsely punc-
tate; OOC 2, 3-1. Fe HO os ee eae 4. tertia, new species
Orbital bar L-shaped, filling the malar space; humeral bar lacking; hind
femur entirely rufous, or black at base ventrally; scape black or yellow
ventrally; mesoscutum abundantly punctate; OOC 1.5-2.0x HO. ...4
Abdomen rufous at apex of segment 2, most of segments 3 and 4.
| 2. balteata, new species
Abdomen BIACK' CORRAL tee ae a TF ICI i ity Beis 9)
Fore and middle coxae black; OOC 1. 75-2.0x HO; petiole length 1.5-1.55x
width; clypeus width 1. 6x height; tyloids on flagellar segments 6-10.
5. flavopicta, new species
Fore and middle coxae black at base and yellow on remainder; OOC 1.5-
1.75x HO; petiole length 1. 8x width; clypeus width 1. 8-1. 9x height; ty-
loids on flagellar segments 6-9, rarely on 10.
6. insculpta, new species
Abdominal segment 3 polished; hind coxa blackened on basal 0.6 except
LOY QACTER Oe ere ge aie Bea ea 3. rohweri Brues
Abdominal segment 3 striate or shagreened on basal 0.3; hind coxa yellow,
with black usually only at base (but sometimes mostly black in sulfurea).
Tyloids on flagellar segments 6-8 or 9; abdomen rufous on apical margins
of segments 2-4, and with large basal yellow spots on segments 3-5;
OOC EF BaF TI ee es ae a oe “1. callosa, new species
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
Tyloids on flagellar segments 6-10 or 11; abdomen black dorsally, some-
times narrowly margined apically with rufous; OOC 1.4-1.55x HO.
oF sulturea, new species
1. Sussaba callosa, new species
(Figure 44)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 4.4 mm.; head polished: occipital carina rounded medially; OOC |
1.0x (1. 1x) HO; face width 1. 6x height, parallel margined; clypeus width 1. 8x
(1. 9x) height, apical lobes subtruncate, shallowly emarginate medially, pol-
ished; malar space 0. 8x (1. 0x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandi-
ble obliquely subtruncate; 23 (22) flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar seg-
ments 6-8 or 9, with a black crescentic area dorsad of each, when present on
9 then small; thorax polished, finely punctate on mesoscutum, remainder most-
ly impunctate; propodeum bearing dorsal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, basal
areas mostly polished, remainder weakly shagreened; nervulus opposite basal
vein; nervellus broken at middle; legs slender; coxae and femora polished and
obscurely punctate; abdomen rounded dorsally, gradually narrowed apically;
petiole slender, length 1.9x width, weakly shagreened and finely striate; seg-
ment 2 slightly longer than wide, striate on basal 0.7; remainder polished
and obscurely punctate; pubescence of abdomen short and abundant; epipleura
distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, antenna ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe,
tip of proepisternum, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron, prepectus; pale yellow
on all coxae and trochanters except for some fuscous on first hind trochanter;
rufous on remainder of legs, more dusky at apex of hind tibia and on hind tar- .
sus; rufous on thyridium, apical margins of segments 2, 3, and 4; yellow at
basal corners of segments 3, 4, and 5.
This species is recognizable in the male by the tyloids and black crescents
on flagellar segments 6-8 or 9, the yellow coxae, and the color of the abdomen.
Type: ¢, km. 185.5, Tuxtepec- -Oaxaca Rd., Oaxaca, Mexico, at 2, 200
m., Oct. 22, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
’Paratypes: 3c. same data as type (Townes).
2. Sussaba balteata, new species
(Figure 45)
Female: 4.2 mm.; head polished; vertex with a median groove; occipital
carina transverse medially; OOC 2.0x HO; face width 1. 8x height, parallel
margined; clypeus width 1. 8x height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shallow
median emargination, polished; malar space 1.3x basal width of mandible;
upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 20 flagellar segments; sense
cones sparse on segment one; thorax polished, finely punctate on mesoscutum,
more obscurely on lower mesopleurum; propodeum bearing strong dorsal,
lateral, and petiolar carinae, basal areas lightly shagreened,. fine wrinkling
on petiolar area; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken below middle;
legs slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen
gradually narrowed apically; petiole length 1.4x width, evenly shagreened, a
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae , 59
lateral carina from spiracle to apex; segment 2 slightly wider than long, finely
striate on basal 0. 8+; lightly shagreened at base of segment 3; remainder of
abdomen polished and largely glabrous; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and
basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on small facial spot below antennae, scape and pedicel
ventrally, mandible, palpi; tawny-rufous ventrally on flagellum; yellow on tegu-
la; wing veins white ventrally; legs mostly rufous; yellow on fore and middle
coxae and all trochanters; fuscous on hind coxa and extreme bases of other
coxae, partly on first hind trochanter; rufous on thyridium and apical margin
of abdominal segment 2, segment 3 except for black basal band, segment 4,
epipleura, and ventral surface. The female from Las Cabras has small yellow
humeral bars and rufous on abdominal segments 3, 4, 5, and the apex of 2.
Male: 4.2 mm.; OOC 1.5x HO; 21 flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar
segments 6-10 with black crescentic area dorsad of each tyloid, tyloid small
on segment 10; sense cones separated by less eons, the width of a cone; abdo-
men more pubescent than in female.
Black. Yellow on large medial facial spot, inner orbit extending through
malar space, clypeus, mandible, palpi; flagellum rufous ventrally; yellow on
tegula; legs as in female; abdomen as in female.
This species is distinctive in the rufous of the abdomen, the pale color
ventrally on the wing veins, the reduced punctation of the thorax, the color of
the legs, the wide separation of the hind ocellus from the occipital carina, and
the sculpturing of the abdomen.
Type: 9, Dalcahue, Chiloe Island, Chile, Jan. 17-Feb. 14, 1962, L. Pefia
(Townes). :
Paratypes: o”, Aulen, Chiloe Island, Chile, Feb. 4, 1952, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 9, Las Cabras, Cordillera Chillan, Chile, at 1,500 m., Jan. 6-31,
1963, L. Pena (Townes). o, Pudahuel, Chile, Nov. 30, 1921, E. Varas
(Cambridge). 9, Rio Gol-Gol, Osorno, Chile, March 13-19, 1955, L. Pena
(Ottawa). o', Chile, No. 190, P. Herbst (Cambridge).
3. Sussaba rohweri Brues
(Figure 46)
Promethes rohweri Brues, 1908. Bul. Wisc. Nat. Hist. Soc. 6:51. o, 9.
Lectotype: o, Florissant, Colo., June 11, 1907, S. A. Rohwer (Milwau-
kee Public Museum).
Female: 4.4-5.4 mm.; head polished, obscurely punctate on vertex and
gena; OOC 1.2-1.3x HO; face width 1.6-1. 8x height, parallel margined; clype-
us width 1.6-2.2x height, apical lobes angulate, meeting medially at an angle
of 160°, polished, a median vertical sulcus present; malar space 0.9-1.3x
basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 18-19
flagellar segments; thorax polished, obscurely punctate on mesoscutum and
mesosternum; pleural carina strong; propodeum bearing weak dorsal, lateral,
and petiolar carinae, partially polished, partially shagreened; legs slender;
coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen slender, rounded
dorsally, progressively narrowed from base of segment 3, compressed from
segment 5 to apex; petiole rectangular, length 1.5-1.8x width, margins paral-
lel behind spiracles, finely longitudinally striate, more shagreened laterally;
segment 2 longer than wide, longitudinally striate on basal 0.5-0.7, polished
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
apically; rest of abdomen polished and largely glabrous; epipleura distinct on
segment 2 and base of 3, sharply inflexed.
Black. Bright yellow on mandible, palpi, median facial spot, inner orbital
bar on middle 0.5 of eye, humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spot under
fore wing, mesepimeron, spots on prepectus; legs black on much of basal 0.7
of hind coxa, extreme bases of other coxae, posterior stripes on fore and
middle femora, basally and posteriorly on hind femur, first hind trochanter;
yellow on rest of coxae, trochanters, fore femur, ventrally on hind tibia;
tawny on rest of fore and middle legs; rufous on hind femur; fuscous dorsally
on hind tibia and all of hind tarsus; large yellow spots at basal corners of ab-
dominal segments 3-7, ay on intersegmental membranes.
Male: 4.3-5.3 mm.; OOC 1.3-1.4x HO; face width 1. 8x height; clypeus
width 2.1-2.3x height; 20- 22 flagellar segments: tyloids variable on segments
5 or 6 to 9 or 10, with black crescentic areas dorsad of tyloids; hairs on fla-
gellum short and erect ventrally, inclined dorsally; abdomen parallel mar-
gined, narrowed apically; petiole length 1.9-2.0x width; pubescence of abdo-
men more abundant than in female.
Black. Yellow on clypeus, mandible, palpi, face, inner orbit, malar
space, scape and pedicel and a few basal flagellar segments ventrally; thorax
marked as in female, but with yellow on proepisternum, prepectus; legs
marked as in female, but hind femur may be heavily infuscated; yellow basal
spots or bands on abdominal segments 3-5, ventrally on intersegmental mem-
branes. Sometimes the humeral bar is recurved and some yellow may be pre-
sent on the lower mesopleurum.
Specimens: 60°, 12, Desierto de los Leones, Distrito Federal, Mexico,
at 2,900 m., Oct. 13, 1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes). 110, Hidalgo
National Park, State of Mexico, Mexico, Oct. 12, 1962, H. & M. Townes
(Townes). o, Rio Frio, 55.5 km. west of Mexico City, Mexico, Oct. 24,
1962, H. & M. Townes (Townes).
This species also occurs in the Canadian, Transition, and Upper Austral
zones of western North America.
4. Sussaba tertia, new species
(Figure 47)
Female: 4.8 mm.; head polished; occipital carina rounded meaaliy: OOC
1.75x HO; face width 1: 6x height, parallel margined; clypeus width 1. 6x
‘height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shallow median emargination, polished;
malar space 1.1x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely
subtruncate; 20 flagellar segments; sense cones sparse on segment one; thorax
polished, shagreened on pronotum, finely punctate on mesoscutum, remainder
mostly impunctate; propodeum bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar
carinae, basal area polished, lateral and petiolar areas shagreened; nervulus
opposite basal vein; nervellus broken slightly below middle; legs slender;
coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen progressively :
narrowed from base of segment 3, strongly compressed from segment 5 to
apex; petiole length 1.6x width, shagreened with some fine striations laterally,
a lateral carina from spiracle to apex; segment 2 longer than wide, striate
and shagreened on basal 0.7; remainder of abdomen polished and largely glab-
rous; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3.
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 61
Black. Yellow on large facial spot below antennae, a small spot on inner
orbit, mandible, palpi; flagellum rufous; yellow on humeral bar, tegula, tip
of pronotal lobe, tip of mesepimeron; yellow on fore and middle coxae and
trochanters, apex of hind coxa, second hind trochanter; black on most of hind
coxa, extreme bases of fore and middle coxae; rufous on most of remainder of
legs, a dusky stripe ventrally on each femur, dorsally on each tibia, dorsally
on hind tarsus; yellow spots at basal corners of segments 3-7.
Male: 4.4-4.6 mm.; face width 1. 8x height; clypeus width 1. 9x height;
malar space 1. 2x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.3-1.4x HO; 21 flagellar seg-
ments; tyloids on flagellar segments 6-10, with black crescentic area dorsad
of each tyloid; sense cones abundant, separated by less than the width of a
cone; petiole length 1.5-1.8x width; abdomen more pubescent than in female,
gradually tapered apically. ,
Black. Yellow on median facial spot, inner orbital bar to level of antenna,
antenna ventrally, clypeus, mandible, palpi, small humeral bar, tegula, tip
of pronotal lobe, tip of mesepimeron; legs as in female, but black more exten-
sive on bases of fore and middle coxae and most of hind femur; yellow at basal
corners of abdominal segments 3 and 4.
This species is recognizable by the color of the abdomen, hind coxa, and
male face, the shagreening of the propodeum and petiole, and the strong pro-.
podeal carinae. It is most closely related to S. rohweri.
Type: 2, El Cuzco, Peru, Feb. 23, 1950, L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 20’, same data as type (Townes).
5. Sussaba flavopicta, new species
(Figures 48 and 61)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 5.2 mm. (4.5 mm.); head polished, obscurely punctate on gena and
medially on face; occipital carina transverse; OOC 2.0x (1. 8x) HO; face width
1. 9x (1. 8x) height, parallel margined; clypeus width 1.6x height, apical lobes
subtruncate with a shallow median emargination, with 3 parallel vertical de-
pressions, polished; malar space 1.0x (1. 3x) basal width of mandible; upper
tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 22 (21) flagellar segments; tyloids on
segments 6-10, small on segment 10, with black crescentic area dorsad of
each tyloid; sense cones separated by more than the width of a cone; thorax
polished, weakly scabrous at notaulus, lightly shagreened on pronotal lobe,
closely and deeply punctate on mesoscutum, more obscurely on pronotal lobe
and mesopleurum, polished around speculum; propodeum bearing strong dor-
sal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, shagreened, with some carinulae on petio-
lar area; nervulus opposite basal vein; nervellus broken below middle; legs
slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdomen rounded
dorsally, mostly parallel margined; petiole length 1.5x width, shagreened
and finely striate laterally, a strong lateral carina through spiracle to apex;
segment 2 as wide as long, striate and lightly shagreened to apex; segment 3
striate and shagreened on basal 0.4; abdominal pubescence sparse; epipleura
distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on inner orbit, extending across malar space, middle of
face, clypeus, mandible, palpi, pedicel ventrally; rufous on flagellum ven-
trally; yellow on minute spot at humeral bar (or absent), and tegula; legs most-
ly rufous; black on all coxae, first trochanters, and bases of femora ventrally;
rest of trochanters yellow; some rufous at apex of abdominal segments 2 and 3.
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
This species is recognizable by the facial pattern of the male, the black
coxae, the punctate mesoscutum, the sculpturing of abdominal segments 1-3,
and the color of the abdomen.
Type: o’, Laguna Amarga, Natales, Magallanes, Chile, Dec. 14-21, 1960,
L. Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 30’, same data as type (Townes).
6. Sussaba insculpta, new species
(Figures 49 and 62)
Female: 5.9 mm.; head polished and obscurely punctate; occipital carina
rounded medially; OOC 1.8x HO; face width 1.9x height, slightly widened ven-
trally; clypeus width 1.65x height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shallow
median emargination, polished; malar space 1.1x basal width of mandible;
upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 flagellar segments; thorax
polished, lightly shagreened in groove on pronotum, scabrous low on metapleu-
rum, closely and deeply punctate on mesoscutum and proepisternum, finely
punctate on mesosternum and lower mesopleurum; mesosternal suture rather
deep; propodeum with strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, shagreened
on basal and lateral areas, scabrous on petiolar area; nervulus opposite basal
vein; nervellus broken below middle; legs slender; coxae and femora polished
and obscurely punctate; abdomen progressively narrowed from base of seg-
ment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole length 1.5x width, rounded dorsally, scab-
rous, a lateral carina from spiracle to apex; segment 2 slightly wider than
long, strongly striate to near apical margin; segment 3 deeply striate on basal
0.6; remainder of abdomen polished and largely glabrous; epipleura distinct on
segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on small facial spot below antennae, mandible, palpi, pedi-
cel ventrally; tawny-rufous on flagellum and scape ventrally; yellow on minute
humeral bar and tegula; legs largely rufous, more tawny on fore and middle
coxae, all trochanters; fuscous on hind coxa except for pale apex; dusky dor-
sally on hind tarsus; rufous on apical margins of abdominal segments 2, 3,
and 4, on epipleura, and ventral surface. |
Male: 4.6-4.7 mm. ; face width 1. 7-1. 8x height; clypeus width 1. 8-1. 9x
height; malar space 1.2x basal width of mandible; OOC 1.5~1. 75x HO; 21-22
flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments 6-9, rarely with small one
on 10, with black crescentic areas dorsad of tyloids; petiole length 1. 8x width.
Black. Yellow on face except for 2 wide black vertical lines from clypeus
to antennal fossae, malar space, clypeus, mandible, scape and pedicel ven-
trally, and palpi; thorax black; legs as in female; abdomen slightly reddish on
apical margins of segments 2, 3, and 4; tawny- -rufous on epipleura and ventral
surface.
This species is distinguished by the deep striations of abdominal segments
2 and 3, the scabrous nature of the petiolar area of the propodeum and petiole,
and the color of the abdomen.
Type: 9, Curacautin, Malleco, Chile, Dec. 19- 21, 1950,°L.: Peha
(Townes).
Paratypes: 2, Ancud, Chiloe Island, Chile, Jan. 23, 1952, L. Pena
(Ottawa). 20°, 29, Aulen, Chiloe Island, Chile, Feb. 4, 1952, L. Peha
(Ottawa). 30°, Rio Gol-Gol, Osorno, Chile, Feb. 8-11, 1957, and March 13-
19, 1955, L. Pena (Ottawa).
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 63
7. Sussaba sulfurea, new species
(Figure 50)
Female: 5.7mm. (4.5 mm.); head polished and obscurely punctate; ver-
tex impressed medially; occipital carina transverse medially; OOC 1. 3x
(1.55x) HO; face width 1. 6x height, slightly widened ventrally; clypeus width
2.0x (1. 9x) height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shallow median emargina-
tion, polished; malar space 1.0x (1. 1x) basal width of mandible; upper tooth
of mandible obliquely subtruncate; 21 (19-20) flagellar segments; thorax pol-
ished, closely and deeply punctate anteriorly on mesoscutum, more obscurely
and sparsely over rest of mesoscutum, lower mesopleurum, and mesosternum;
propodeum bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar carinae, basal area
weakly punctate and polished, lateral area roughly shagreened, and petiolar
area weakly rugulose; nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken below
middle; legs slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate; abdo-
men progressively tapered from base of segment 3 to apex of abdomen; petiole
length 1.55x (1. 7x) width, weakly scabrous, a lateral carina from spiracle to
apex; segment 2 slightly longer than wide, striate on basal 0.8, the rest pol-
ished; segment 3 striate on basal 0.3; remainder of abdomen polished and
largely glabrous; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on large medial spot on face, inner orbit, mandible, palpi,
scape and pedicel ventrally; tawny-rufous ventrally on flagellum, more fuscous
dorsally; yellow on humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, spots on prepec-
tus, subtegular ridge, mesepimeron; legs largely rufous, yellow on fore and
middle coxae, laterally and apically on hind coxa, all trochanters, and more
or less of fore and middle femora; black basally and medially on hind coxa;
dusky dorsally on each tibia, ventrally on fore and middle femora, apex of
hind tibia, and all tarsi; stigma and wing veins pale ventrally; rufous on thy-
ridium and apical margin of segment 2; yellow apical bands on segments 3-7,
laterally on segments 3-7, epipleura, and ventral surface; yellow at basal
corners of segments 3-7. The yellow on the inner orbit may be lacking. The
specimens from Caramavida, Chile, are darker, having the hind coxa mostly
blackened except on angles and apex, the inner orbits are black, and the abdo-
men is largely black dorsal to the lateral margins of the terga.
Male: 4.2-4.6 mm.; face width 1.5-1.75x height; malar space 1.1-1.2x
basal width of mandible; 21 flagellar segments; tyloids on flagellar segments
6-10 or 11, black crescentic area dorsad of each tyloid, tyloid on segment 11
small when present; petiole length 1. 7-1. 8x width; abdomen more heavily
pubescent than in female.
Black. Yellow on face, inner orbit, malar space, lower gena, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, antenna ventrally, humeral bar, tegula, tip of proepisternum,
tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge, prepectus, longitudinal stripe on lower
mesopleurum, and mesepimeron; legs as in female, but black usually restric-
ted to base of hind coxa; abdomen as in female, but apical rufous bands re-
duced to margin. The longitudinal stripe on the mesopleurum may be lacking,
and the hind coxa may be largely blackened.
This species is recognizable by the sculpturing of the first three abdomi-
nal segments, the color of the abdomen and thorax, the yellow inner orbit of
the female, and the tyloid arrangement of the male.
Type: 9, Dalcahue, Chiloe Island, Chile, Jan. 17-Feb. 14, 1962, L.
Pena (Townes).
Paratypes: 20°, 19, Butamalal, Arauco, Chile, Jan. 23, 31, 1954, and
Feb. 21, 1953, L. Pena (Ottawa). 29, Caramavida, Arauco, Chile, Jan. 11,
64 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1964
1954, and Dec. 21, 1953, L. Pena (Ottawa). 30°’, 22, same data as type
(Townes). o', Liucura, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 1-9, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa).
2°, Pichinahuel, Cordillera Nahuelbuta, Arauco, Chile, 1,100-1,400 m., Jan.
1-10, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa); Jan. 20-28, 1959, L. Pena (Townes). 9, Ter-
mas Tolhuaca, Malleco, Chile, Jan. 15-20, 1959, L. Pena (Ottawa).
8. Sussaba ruida, new species
(Figure 51)
Female: Unknown.
Male: 4.7 mm.; head lightly shagreened; vertex impressed medially;
occipital carina rounded medially; OOC 1.4x HO; face width 1. 8x height, paral-
lel margined; clypeus width 1. 8x height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shal-
low median emargination, polished; malar space 0.9x basal width of mandible;
upper tooth of mandible obliquely subtruncate; thorax lightly shagreened an-
teriorly on mesoscutum, pronotum, and anterior mesopleurum, remainder
polished and finely punctate; propodeum bearing strong dorsal, lateral, and
petiolar carinae, shagreened; nervulus slightly distad of basal vein; nervellus
broken below middle; legs slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely
punctate; petiole length 1.4x width, evenly shagreened; segment 2 slightly
longer than wide, evenly shagreened; abdomen shagreened on segments 3 and
4, polished over remainder of segments; epipleura distinct on segment 2 and
basal 0.3 of 3.
Black. Yellow on middle of face, inner orbit, malar space, clypeus,
mandible, palpi, scape and pedicel ventrally; flagellum rufous ventrally; yel-
low on tegula; legs mostly rufous; yellow on fore and middle coxae, apex of
hind coxa, fore and middle trochanters, and second hind trochanter; fuscous
at extreme bases of fore and middle coxae, most of hind coxa, and first hind
trochanter; rufous on apical margin of abdominal segment 2, apical halves of
3 and 4.
This species is recognizable by the extensive shagreening of the head,
thorax, and abdomen, the rufous color on the abdomen, and the color of the
face.
Type: o, Chile, P. Herbst (Cambridge).
9. Sussaba spilota, new species
(Figure 52)
Female: 5.3 mm.; head polished, obscurely punctate on gena, frons, and
vertex; occipital carina rounded medially; vertex impressed medially; OOC
1.9x HO; face width 1. 7x height, slightly widened ventrally; clypeus width 1. 9x
height, apical lobes subtruncate with a shallow median emargination, polished;
malar space 1.3x basal width of mandible; upper tooth of mandible obliquely
subtruncate; 19 flagellar segments; mesoscutum polished and heavily punctate;
rest of thorax polished and obscurely punctate except on speculum, rugulose
low on metapleurum; propodeum with strong dorsal, lateral, and petiolar
carinae, shagreened on basal area, rugulose on lateral and petiolar area;
nervulus distad of basal vein; nervellus broken below middle, discoidella
rather weak; legs slender; coxae and femora polished and obscurely punctate;
abdomen stout, narrowed from base of segment 3 to apex; petiole length 1. 6x
Dasch: The Neotropic Diplazontinae 65
width, rugulose with more distinct striations at apical margin; segment 2
slightly wider than long, shagreened basally and more polished apically, stri-
ate medially on basal 0.6; rest of abdomen mostly polished and nearly glab-
rous; epipleura distinct on-segment 2 and base of 3.
Black. Yellow on large facial spot, mandible, and palpi; flagellum rufous;
yellow on large humeral bar, tegula, tip of pronotal lobe, subtegular ridge and
tip of mesepimeron; yellow on fore and middle coxae and all trochanters; black
on flat faces of basal 0.6 of hind coxa; remainder of legs rufous; rufous on
apical 0.2 of abdominal segment 2, all of 3 and 4, and epipleura; yellow on
large spots at basal corners of segments 3 and 4 and on ventral surface.
Male: Unknown.
This species is recognizable by the color of the abdomen, and the sculp-
turing of the thorax and abdomen.
Type: 2, Fco Madero, Argentina, 1952, J. Foerster (Ottawa).
8. Diplazon pullatus
Figures 1-8. Left hind legs.
eneve
Ste ss
of)
Figures 9-16. Left hind legs.
——
ge
= 3
©
=
©
gale
=
©
Oo
74)
ao
pa)
=
fon
co
Nf
+07
3. Homotropus preclarus ¢
o5
24. Homotropus mexicanus ¢
Figures 17-24. Left hind legs.
30. Homotropus macrogaster
% =~
IRS,
32. Homotropus furvus ¢
33. Homotropus lissosoma
Figures 25-33. Left hind legs.
cereszeyas
BEIGE
69
see 00"),
<
kT oh ae PES
ae
K
an
i
38. Syrphoctonus hidalgoensis
4). Syrphoctonus concavus
42. Syrphoctonus caccabatus ¢
Figures 34-42. Left hind legs.
aS
44, Sussaba callosa «
“Sy :
51. Sussaba ruidac
52. Sussaba Spilota 9
Figures 43-52. Left hind legs.
1
Diplazon laetatorius ¢
Homotropus comptus ?
Homotropus calvus o
59. Syrphoctonus erythromelas 9
60. Promethes dolosus 9
6. Sussaba 5 lave of
rots
Te: aed
tie wet a
- ee
62. Sussaba insculpta ¢
Oe
63. Syrphoctonus concavus
64. Syrphoctonus erythromelas ¢
Figures 63-64. Top views of heads.
Figures 53-62. Clypei.
65. HOMOTROPUS elegans ¢
: h 9 a
<o e
66. SYRPHOCTONUS biguttatus ¢ o£
Figures 65-66. Habitus figures of genotypes, showing side view, front view of head, and top view of propodeum
and first abdominal segment. !
68. SUSSABA pulchella ¢
Figures 67-68. Habitus figures of genotypes, showing side view, front view of head, and top view of propodeum
and first abdominal segment.
Figure 69. Habitus figure of genotype, showing side view, front view of head, and top view of propodeum
and first abdominal segment.
76
INDEX TO NEOTROPIC DIPLAZONTINAE
*An asterisk indicates a synonym or misspelling.
xagilis (Bassus) 48
*akaashii (Homocidus) 17
*albovarius (Bassus) 6 }
alternatus (Homotropus) 22 (keys), 42, 43,
69 (fig. ) we
*angustorius (Ichneumon) 17.
anolcus (Diplazon) 3, 4 & 5 (keys), 15, 67
(fig. )
*attractus (Anomalon) 6
*balearicus (Bassus) 6
balteata (Sussaba) 56 & 57 (keys), 58, 71
(fig. )
*Bassus 3
*bicarinata (Sussaba) 55
biguttatus (Syrphoctonus, Bassus) 46, 73
(fig. )
*bimaculatus (Bassus) 48
brevis (Homotropus) 21 & 23 (keys), 24, 67
(fig. )
caccabatus (Syrphoctonus) 47 (keys), 53, 70
(fig. ) tye
callosa (Sussaba) 56 & 57 (keys), 58, 71
(fig. ) cy
calvus (Homotropus) 20 & 23 (keys), 39, 69
& 72 (figs. ) we
chilensis (Homotropus) 22 & 23 (keys), 40,
69 (fig. ) Be
*cinctipes (Bassus) 6
*cinctulus (Bassus) 8
comptus (Homotropus) 21 & 24 (keys), 32,
68 & 72 (figs. ) nc
concavus (Syrphoctonus) 47 (keys), 52, 70 &
72 (figs. ) re
cuneatus (Homotropus) 20 & 23 (keys), 33,
68 & 72 (figs. ) hat
decoratus (Homotropus, Bassus) 21 & 24
(keys), 25, 67 (fig. )
*dichrous (Ichneumon) 6
Diplazon 2 (key), 3
dolichus (Homotropus) 21 & 22 (keys), 41,
69 & 72 (figs. ). es
dolosus (Promethes) 54, 71 & 72 (figs.)
elegans (Homotropus, Bassus) 19, 73 (fig. )
erugatus (Diplazon) 4 & 5 (keys), 10, 11, 66
(fig. ) ae
-erythromelas (Syrphoctonus) 47 (keys), 49,
70 & 72 (figs. )
flavicauda (Syrphoctonus) 47 (keys), 51, 70
(fig. ) ue
flavidus (Homotropus) 22 & 23 (keys), 30, 68
(fig. ) a
flavolineatus (Syrphoctonus, Bassus) 47 (keys),
48, 70 (fig. )
flavopicta (Sussaba) 56 & 57 (keys), 61, 71 &
72 (figs. ) Le
*frontalis (Bassus) 48
furvus (Homotropus) 22 (keys), 43, 69 (fig. )
fuscitarsus (Homotropus nigritarsus, Bassus)
22 & 24 (keys), 26, 67 (fig.)
*renerosus (Bassus) 6
graculus (Tymmophorus) 2
groenlandicus (Homotropus nigritarsus) 28
hidalgoensis (Syrphoctonus) 47 (keys), 50,
70 (fig. ) oe
*Homocidus 19, 20
-*Homoporus 19
Homotropus 2 (key), 19, 20
*humeralis (Tryphon) 26
*ikiti (Bassus laetatorius) 7
implanus (Diplazon) 3, 4 & 5 (keys), 12, 66
(fig. )
insculpta (Sussaba) 56 & 57 (keys), 62, 71 &
72 (figs.) na
*interruptus (Bassus) 48
interstinctus (Homotropus) 20 & 22 (keys),
37, 69 (fig. )
*junctus (Mesoleius) 48
laetatorius (Diplazon, Ichneumon) 3, 5 & 6
(keys), 66 & 72 & 75 (figs. )
limbatus (Homotropus) 22 & 24 (keys), 31,
68 (fig. )
* Liopsis 54
lissosoma (Homotropus) 20 & 23 (keys), 44,
69 (fig. )
*lituratorius (Ichneumon) 6
macrogaster (Homotropus) 21 & 22 (keys),
42, 69 (fig. )
maculifrons (Homotropus, Bassus) 21 & 23
(keys), 34, 38, 68 (fig. )
masoni (Homotropus) 20 & 22 (keys),
(fig. )
mexicanus (Homotropus) 21 & 22 (keys), 36,
68 & 72 (figs. )
mulleolus (Diplazon) 4 & 5 (keys), 18, 67
(fig. ) ae
e418
orbitalis (Diplazon, Bassus) 3, 5 & 6 (keys),
8, 10, 66 (fig. )
-pacificus (Homotropus, Bassus) 21 & 23
(keys), 38, 69 (fig. )
paulus (Sy rphoctonus) 47 (keys) 50, 70 (fig. )
pectoratorius (Diplazon, Ichneumon, Bassus)
3, 4&5 (keys), 17, 67 (fig.)
*pleuralis (Polysphincta) 17
preclarus (Homotropus) 2, 21 & 23 (keys),
$5, 68 (ig
prolatus (Diplazon) 4 & 5 (keys), 16, 67 (fig. )
Promethes 2 (key), 54, 56
*Promethus 54
pulchella (Sussaba) 55, 174 (fig. )
Index to Neotropic Diplazontinae | qt
*pulchripes (Bassus) 17
pullatus (Diplazon) 4 & 6 (keys), 14, 66 (fig. )
rohweri (Sussaba, Promethes) 57 (keys), 59,
61, 71 (fig.) Le ae
ruficauda (Homotropus) 22 & 24 (keys), 29,
68 (fig. ) Fs
rufoscutatus (Diplazon) 4 & 5 (keys), 13, 66
(fig. )
ruida (Sussaba) 55, 56 & 57 (keys), 64, 71
(fig. ) ie
scutellaris (Diplazon, Bassus) 3, 4 & 5
(keys), 11, 13, 66 (fig. )
*semifasciatus (Bassus) 34
spilota (Sussaba) 56 & 57 (keys), 64, 71
(fig. )
stictonotus (Homotropus) 21, 22 & 24 (keys),
28, 67 (fig. )
sulcator (Promethes, Bassus) 54, 74 (fig.)
sulfurea (Sussaba) 56 & 57 & 58 (keys), 63,
Th fie.) Be
Sussaba 2 (key), 54, 55
*sycophanta (Bassus) 6
Syrphoctonus 3 (key), 46
*terminalis (Bassus laetatorius) 6
tertia (Sussaba) 57 (keys), 60, 71 (fig. )
trachysoma (Homotropus) 20 & 23 (keys),
45, 70 (fig.)
triangulus (Diplazon) 4 & 6 (keys), 10, 11,
66 (fig. ) i
*tripicticrus (Bassus) 6
*urupensis (Bassus) 17
*varipes (Scolobates) 6
*venustulus (Bassus) 6
*xanthopsis (Bassus) 38
Hs
noi
rer
qed ye
rae i
nN orn
errs
ee
gee
mes
‘
S
wer
AS|
ENt
Contributions in A066
of the :
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 2, 1965
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America.
Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation
of mosquitoes.
I.
II.
By
John N. Belkin and others
PUBLICATIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Contribution Series
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number,
with separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a
volume. Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes
are $12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with
its beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total
less than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders or correspondence to the
American Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
Volume I
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumoni-
dae). 75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2. Belkin, John N., etal. 1965. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae).
I. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of Middle America.
II. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation of mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
Memoir Series
The Memoirs are for book-length monographs on insects. They are issued as cloth-bound
volumes, at irregular intervals as suitable manuscripts are available. Numbers are sold
separately, or in subscriptions to the series. Subscribers receive a 10% discount from the regu-
lar price. Address orders or correspondence to the American ciara Sa Institute, 5950
Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
‘Issued to date:
No. 1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1961. A catalogue
and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. 522 pages.
Price: $14.50, postpaid
No. 2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1962. Ichneumonidae of America north
of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. 305 pages, 162 maps,
116 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
No. 3. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5. Sub-
family Diplazontinae. 304 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
Price: $9.50, postpaid
No. 4. Matsuda, Ryuichi. 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head. 334 pages,
111 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
ee er,
Se
am
|
'
{
ee ee Se
SE SR en
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 2, 1965
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
I. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America.
II. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation
of mosquitoes.
By
John N. Belkin and others
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
I. A PROJECT FOR A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF
THE MOSQUITOES OF MIDDLE AMERICA!
By
John N. Belbin:. Robert X. Sonic. Pedro Galindo.
and Thomas H. G. dent
: This investigation is supported in part by Public Health Service Research
Grant AI-04379, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
and in part by U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command,
Department of the Army, under Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-2478.
; Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Califor-
nia 90024. i
: Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Apartado 6991, Panama, Republica de
Panama.
| Peinadad Regional Virus Laboratory, P. O. Box 164, Port of Spain,
Trinidad.
2 Contrib. Amer. Emt. ‘Inst., vol. 1, no: 2, 1965
INTRODUCTION
Definition of Area. Middle America, as here defined, comprises Central
America and the West Indies as well as adjacent portions of North America
and South America and their islands, within the following arbitrary boundaries:
in the north the 35° parallel and in the south the northern margin of the Amazon
basin westward across the Andes to Punta Parinas in northern Peru (fig. 1).
The region thus defined comprises the following political divisions: United
States (Southwestern, Southern and Southeastern States), Mexico (including
Guadelupe and Revillagigedo islands), British Honduras, Guatemala, Honduras,
El Salvador, Nicaragua, Clipperton Island, Costa Rica (including Cocos Is-
land), Panama, Colombia (all except southeastern part), Ecuador (western part
and Galapagos Islands), Peru (extreme northwestern tip), French Guiana, Su-
rinam, British Guiana, Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago, British West Indies
and other dependencies, Netherlands West Indies, French West Indies, Virgin
Islands, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Cuba, Bahama Is-
lands and Bermuda.
Current Status of Knowledge. The mosquito fauna of Middle America has
not been studied as a unit since the monumental monograph ''The Mosquitoes of
North and Central America and the West Indies'"’ by Howard, Dyar and Knab
(1912-1917) which was based on field work carried out primarily from 1905
through 1908, at the time of the building of the Panama Canal, and the revision
and supplement to this monograph, '’'The Mosquitoes of the Americas," by Dy-
ar (1928). In spite of the vast amount of material and information that has ac-
cumulated in nearly 50 years, little progress has been made in understanding
or adequately describing this mosquito fauna since the appearance of the first
publication mentioned above. Lane's ''Neotropical Culicidae' (1953), the latest
general work covering the area, is inadequate because of incomplete coverage,
superficial treatment of species and unreliable keys and illustrations. At the
present, one has to rely for identification in many groups on Dyar (1928) or e-
ven Howard, Dyar and Knab (1915, 1917). While many new species have been
described and several regional lists and-studies have been made (notably Andu-
ze 1947; Bonne and Bonne-Wepster 1925; Carpenter and LaCasse 1955; Cova-
Garcia 1961; Fauran 1961; Hill and Hill 1948; Komp 1936; Kumm, Komp and
Ruiz 1940; Kumm and Zuniga 1942; van der Kuyp 1954; Martini 1935; Patino-
Camargo 1940; Perez Vigueras 1956; Tulloch 1937; Vargas 1956, 1959; Vargas
and Martinez Palacios 1956), only a few groups have been studied in some de-
tail for the entire area (notably Belkin and Hogue 1959; Foote 1954; Forattini
1961; Galindo, Blanton and Peyton 1954; Komp 1942; Rozeboom and Komp 1950;
Simmons and Aitken 1942). The immature stages of many species are not
known at present and in many groups species are differentiated primarily or
entirely on male genitalia. In several groups it is impossible to get accurate
identification even of common species. In many instances very distinct spe-
cies have been erroneously synonymized with widespread species on very su-
perficial characters. No attempt has been made to analyze the mosquito fauna
of the entire area, very little attention has been paid to the study of nonbiting
forms and only a few species have been completely described in all stages.
In recent years a great deal of new material and information have been ob-
tained in several localities in this area in connection with studies on mosquito-
borne diseases. The material has been studied only as pressure of other work
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 2
has permitted and the data obtained have not been summarized or systemati-
cally analyzed. At the present time extensive projects on malaria eradication
are in operation in this area, much other mosquito control work is being car-
ried on and extensive studies on insect-borne viruses are in progress. This is
a most propitious time to carry out a systematic project on the mosquito fauna
of the entire area because there is a great need for a more detailed and more
readily available knowledge of the taxonomy, distribution and bionomics of
vector species and because of the willingness, even eagerness, of many work-
ers to contribute to the project through collections, rearings, observations
and detailed studies.
Significance of Project. This project should contribute materially to a bet-
ter understanding of the mosquito fauna of Middle America. From a practical
standpoint this may be of considerable importance in the control of mosquito-
borne diseases in the area. It would also be of considerable value for the epi-
demiological studies on mosquito-borne viruses currently being carried out in
Middle America. The cooperative studies and the training of students from
Middle America may be of significance in providing a stimulus for independent
studies of this type in the future.
In addition to the strictly utilitarian aspects, the mosquito fauna of Middle
America is of extraordinary interest to the biologist because it is the most
unique and precinctive (endemic) one in the world: In this area all the "neo-
tropical’ phylads (natural groups) are represented and several of these are
completely precinctive to Middle America. There are also several annectent
precinctive 'nearctic’ phylads in this area. Although many biogeographers
regard Middle America, and particularly Mexico and Central America, as a
transitional zone between the Nearctic and Neotropical regions, there are in-
dications that at least in the case of mosquitoes this area has been the main
center of origin and distribution of the precinctive phylads of the New World
(Belkin 1961: 164, 1962: 57-59). Ona worldwide basis only the intercontinen-
tal Indo-Pacific area has been of greater importance in the evolution of mos-
quitoes. It is also evident that in Middle America there are many relict spe-
cies and that their present distributions may be of considerable value in recon-
structing the geological history and understanding the biogeography of the New
World. A more thorough knowledge of this mosquito fauna in all its aspects
will undoubtedly contribute materially to a better understanding of the mor-
phology, ecology and evolution of mosquitoes.
History and Future Development of Project. Belkin became interested in
this area following the collection of several Arizona and California mosquitoes
which exhibited affinities with Mexican and Central American forms (Belkin
and McDonald 1955, 1956, 1957; McDonald 1957a, 1957b; McDonald and Belkin
1961). After a study of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites
(Belkin and Hogue 1959) it was decided to organize a project on the ''Mosqui-
toes of Middle America'’ and to seek support from the U.S. Public Health Ser-
vice. The project began in January 1962 under Research Grant AI-04379 and
received additional support in August 1963 from U.S. Army Medical Research
and Development Command. Charles L. Hogue was Co-investigator from the
beginning to June 30, 1964 and Robert X. Schick, who joined the project in No-
vember 1963, became Co-investigator on July 1, 1964. |
From its beginning the project received enthusiastic support from a large
number of individuals and organizations in Middle America. The purpose of
4. Contrib. Amer. Emnt.,.Insts, voll, no. 2, 1965
the present article is to describe the scope, objectives, organization and meth-
odology of the project ''Mosquitoes of Middle America" and to bring this pro-
ject to the attention of all individuals and institutions interested in the mosqui-
toes of the area. It is anticipated that this long-term project will be carried
on for 10 to 15 years and can only be accomplished successfully with the co-
operation of workers from all the countries of the area. We wish to point out
also that several facilities and services are now or soon will be available for
interested parties in our main laboratory at the University of California, Los
Angeles (UCLA).
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
The primary objectives of the project are: (1) to describe and illustrate in
detail all the known stages of mosquitoes found in the area, (2) to summarize
all the readily available information on distribution, bionomics and disease re-
lations of all species, (3) to analyze the mosquito fauna of the area from the
standpoint of its composition, origin and evolution and its relationships with
the mosquito fauna of the rest of the world and (4) to make all the data obtained
available in preliminary and definitive publications.
The entire family Culicidae in the broadest sense, including the subfami-
lies Culicinae (true mosquitoes), Dixinae (dixa midges) and Chaoborinae (phan-
tom midges), will be studied. The magnitude and complexity of the project can
be appreciated from the fact that at the present time about 600 species have
been reported from the area as defined in the INTRODUCTION (Stone, Knight
and Starcke 1959; Stone 1961, 1963) and it is evident that there are many unde-
scribed and many incorrectly synonymized species. Many of the indigenous
forms have been identified as wide-ranging species, originally described from
outside the area, on the basis of very hasty comparison and incomplete know-
ledge of immature stages. A total of 1420 described nominal forms will have
to be considered in this study. It seems likely that eventually there will be
recognized well over 1,000 species from the area. It is obvious therefore that
only an organized long-term systematic project dealing exclusively with taxon-
omy in all its phases will enable us to attain a reasonable knowledge of this
complex fauna.
ORGANIZATION
Los Angeles Laboratory. Headquarters for the project are located in the
Zoology Department, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The pro-
fessional staff for the project consists at present of John N. Belkin, Project
Director and Robert X. Schick, Co-investigator. The technical staff includes
3 full time technicians and several part-time student assistants and illustra-
tors. All the standard equipment necessary for taxonomic work (microscopes,
illuminators, mechanical drawing aids, etc.) as well as a rearing room are
available. The central research collection of mosquitoes of Middle America
is maintained here (see MATERIAL) and there is also a representative collec-
tion of mosquitoes of the world, which is particularly strong in Australasian
forms. A complete classified file of literature on mosquitoes of Middle Amer-
ica is being formed (see DOCUMENTATION) and will be available to all inter-
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 5)
ested parties. The laboratory processes and prepares for study all the mate-
rial and maintains records of all the data obtained for the project. It also
maintains stocks of supplies and equipment used in the field. The bulk of the
taxonomic studies will be carried on here by the UCLA staff independently or
jointly with cooperators. All the facilities and services of the laboratory are
freely available to cooperators, including identification of material, illustra-
tion and preparation of manuscripts for photo-offset publication. Members of
the UCLA staff will also carry on special field studies as well as surveys in
areas where cooperators are not available and will take part in training tech-
nicians for cooperative field projects.
Cooperators. Although originally designed as a personal research project,
the program on the ''Mosquitoes of Middle America" is now an informal co-
operative effort of many individuals and organizations in the area as indicated
in the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. Its magnitude and usefulness are dependent to a
large extent on the efforts of individual cooperators. To date much of the ma-
terial for study has been obtained through voluntary cooperators. It is planned
for the bulk of the field work in the future to be done by local personnel under
the supervision of senior cooperators with the assistance, when needed and de-
sired, of UCLA in the matter of coordination, instructions, training, supplies
and equipment (see FIELD WORK). Other ways in which cooperators can con-
tribute to the project is by making available previously collected material and
data (including reprints of all papers), providing field facilities for the UCLA
staff, and by undertaking joint or independent studies of the local fauna. Joint
taxonomic studies by senior professional personnel from Middle America and
the UCLA staff are being developed and it is planned to bring a number of these
investigators for short periods to Los Angeles to work on special problems.
Eventually we hope to have at least one cooperator in each country with whom
joint studies will be undertaken on the local fauna or on special groups. As in-
dicated above, the Los Angeles laboratory will provide a number of facilities
for cooperators not only for joint projects but for independent studies on the
mosquitoes of the area as well. The disposition of the material obtained for
the project is discussed in the section on MATERIAL and the arrangements for
authorship of articles arising from joint studies in the section on PUBLICA-
TIONS. The financing of cooperative or joint studies is indicated below.
Students. An important feature of the project is the training of investiga-
tors to carry on and extend the present studies. Qualified students will be
given the opportunity to pursue graduate studies inthe Zoology Department,
University of California, Los Angeles while employed as part-time Research
Assistants on the project. In addition to the routine taxonomic work for their
employment the majority of these students will be undertaking a research
problem directly related to the project. It is hoped that in this manner we will
arouse the interest and will train young nationals from Middle America as well
as the United States to carry on additional studies independently in the future.
Financing. The project is currently supported primarily by research funds
supplied by the U.S. Public Health Service and the U.S. Army Medical Re-
search and Development Command and administered by the University of Cali-
fornia, Los Angeles (see footnote on page 1). The facilities in Los Angeles
are provided by the University of California.. Limited funds are available from
the grants for the purchase of services for the collection of mosquitoes from
cooperating individuals, organizations or institutions. In general these funds
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
can be used for all expenses incurred in connection with the collection, rear-
ing and shipment of material expressly gathered for the project. All supplies
and equipment for the field work are also provided by UCLA. However, it is
not practical to buy vehicles or to hire full time personnel with the available
research funds. Therefore, the cooperating agencies are expected to provide
these but will be reimbursed for the extra expenses through the project when
needed. It is hoped that at least some cooperating organizations will see fit to
include this project as part of their regular activities and will provide funds
for their phase of the work through their regular budget. For disposition of
material obtained through cooperatively financed field work see the section on
MATERIAL.
Research funds will also be available to bring senior cooperators for short
periods to the Los Angeles laboratory for special joint or individual taxonomic
studies and will provide qualified young nationals from Middle America with an
opportunity to finance graduate studies at the University of California, Los An-
geles through half time employment as Research Assistants on the project.
All publications connected with the project will also be financed through the re-
search funds.
MATERIAL
Nature and Source. It is planned to study all the mosquito material from
Middle America, whatever its type and condition, now preserved in various
museums, institutions or private collections and to make special collections
and rearings at several strategic localities (see FIELD WORK). All the mate-
rial specifically collected for or donated to the project will be processed, pre-
pared, labeled and stored according to standardized methods at UCLA and will
remain there for the duration of the project as the Research Collection (see
below). Other material will be borrowed from or studied at various museums
and institutions.
Labeling. Collections made for the project will carry a distinctive printed
general country locality label with one or more letter codes for the country and
a single consecutive numerical sequence beginning with #1 for all collections
for each letter code (fig. 2). All the data pertaining to each collection, includ-
ing the exact locality, will be entered on a standard record card (see FIELD
WORK and Belkin et al. 1965) and the data from these cards will be summa-
rized and published periodically (see PUBLICATIONS). Every specimen iden-
tified on the project will be provided with a distinctive species label (fig. 2),
attached to the pin or slide or included in the vial. The date of identification
(last two digits of year) and male sex sign will be written in (the specimen is a
female if this is missing). 7
Processing. For the sake of uniformity and to conserve time no permanent
mounts of adults or immatures should be made in the field. The material will
be preserved, packed and shipped according to the methods outlined by Belkin
et al. (1965). At UCLA standardized techniques will be used for all the mate-
rial, in general following the methods of Belkin (1962: 68-71, 73-77). The
adults will be mounted on the right side, legs facing the pin, on heavy paper
"points, '’ using 'Ambroid'’ cement. All the mounts on slides will be in clear
"Euparal'’ and with #1 thickness circular coverglasses.
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America fs
Disposition of Types. Holotypes, allotypes and paratypes of new mosqui-
to species described on the project will be deposited as follows:
(1) When the holotypes and allotypes are specimens collected for the pro-
ject they will be deposited in the U.S. National Museum (USNM).
(2) When the holotypes, allotypes and/or paratypes are specimens borrowed
from institutions or individuals the depository of these will be determined in
consultation with the owner(s) of the specimens.
(3) Paratypes of all new species, as far as their number will permit, will
be deposited in the following institutions: UCLA; USNM; British Museum (Nat.
Hist.) (BMNH); Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Panama; Faculdade de Medicina
de Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil; Museo de la Plata, Argentina.
(4) Paratypes of species described from a particular country or dependency
will be deposited also in an appropriate national scientific or research institu-
tion in their country of origin or mother country as follows:
COLOMBIA, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica
COMMONWEALTH NATIONS and BRITISH DEPENDENCIES, Trinidad Re-
gional Virus Laboratory or Institute of Jamaica
COSTA RICA, Universidad de Costa Rica
FRENCH DEPENDENCIES, Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique
Outre-Mer (ORSTOM), Bondy, France
GUATEMALA, Entomoteca de Sanidad Publica
MEXICO, Instituto de Salubridad y Enfermedades Tropicales
NETHERLANDS DEPENDENCIES, Instituut voor Tropische Hygiene, Am-
sterdam
PANAMA, Gorgas Memorial Laboratory
PUERTO RICO and the VIRGIN ISLANDS, School of Tropical Medicine, Uni-
versity of Puerto Rico
VENEZUELA, Instituto de Higiene
For other countries type depositories will be designated later.
Research Collection. The bulk of the material collected for or donated to
the project will constitute the Research Collection which will remain in the De-
partment of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles for the duration of
the project and will be available for study to any qualified investigator on re-
quest. Upon completion of the project it will be deposited in toto at the U.S.
National Museum if facilities are available or if these are limited then at the
Los Angeles County Museum.
Regional Reference Collections. A representative collection of the species
occurring in each country will be deposited in the institutions mentioned above
as depositories of paratypes. Representative collections of species occurring
in the entire area will be deposited at USNM, BMNH and any of the above-men-
tioned institutions that may be interested.
Identification Service. The UCLA laboratory will endeavor to Cae a
service for the identification of mosquitoes of the area starting immediately.
Naturally in some groups specific identifications will not be possible for some
time. Material forwarded for identification must be prepared and packed ac-
cording to the methods specified in Belkin et al. (1965). A share of the identi-
fied material will be retained at UCLA.
DOCUMENTATION
In a project of this size and complexity it is essential that all the data are
readily available for use and comparison. Therefore a special effort will be
8 Contrib. Amer: Enti inst,” vol. 2"ne. 21965
made to provide a documentation center for the project at UCLA. All the in-
formation will be available on request to qualified investigators.
Literature File. There will be prepared and maintained a complete file of
all the literature dealing with the mosquitoes of Middle America in the fields
of taxonomy, bionomics, distribution and disease relations. The individual ar-
ticles will be reproduced by xerography and portions of these copies will also
be filed under the appropriate classified files as indicated below. We urgently
request all cooperators to send reprints of all papers and reports, particular-
ly those appearing locally, to the UCLA literature file at the earliest oppor-
tunity.
Collection File. A standard form (Belkin et al. 1965) will be used to re-
cord all the appropriate data for the field collections made for the project.
These forms will serve as the basis for compilations on distribution, bionom-
ics and faunal analysis. Xerographic copies of these will also be filed under
the respective species, providing distribution records as well as data on bio-
nomics.
Taxonomic File. All data pertaining to a given taxon will be reproduced by
xerography (or a similar process) and kept in a file under that taxon. This
will include pertinent portions of all published papers dealing with the taxon
and unpublished data accumulated during the present investigation, i.e. all the
collection and distribution records, illustrations and notes.
Distribution File. For each country or island there will be prepared (1) a
file of all species originally described from that locality, (2) a file of all spe-
cies reported.
FIELD WORK
Scope. A vast amount of mosquito material is available from Middle Amer-
ica but very little of it includes individual or progeny rearings without which
definite association of sexes and stages and unequivocal identification as to
species cannot be made. Therefore it is essential for the project to obtain this
type of material. A complete census of all species occurring in Middle Amer-
ica could not be accomplished in the life time of a single generation of investi-
gators even with continuous systematic collecting throughout the area year af-
ter year. For the present project field studies will have to be limited to the
most significant features needed to place the study of the mosquitoes of the
area on a firm foundation.
Although considerable material from some areas has been accumulated
since field work on the project began in November 1962 it will be necessary to
carry on more or less extensive field studies for several years in nearly all
the countries included in the project. In addition since many of the important
species reported from Middle America were originally described from Brazil
and Argentina and a few from Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay it
will be essential to obtain reared topotypic material of these forms either
through field work in these countries or by exchange with local cooperators.
Personnel. The field work will be done whenever possible by local person-
nel under the supervision of cooperators after a brief period of training by a
member of the UCLA staff. Where cooperators are not available field parties
from UCLA will do the collecting and rearing. Each of the Research Assis-
tants will spend at least two months in the field on surveys or on special field
problems, preferably from a base at a cooperating institution.
PS Ee ee
EN oe a ah Na a a a a A aS ge ig os De a
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 9
Methods. The collections and rearings will be done according to simple
techniques and using standardized equipment and forms that will enable us to
obtain a large quantity of uniform material with a minimum of effort (see Bel-
kin et al. 1965). Although emphasis will be on individual and progeny rearings
it is very important to obtain general collections of adults and immature sta-
ges also. All the material will be processed, mounted and provisionally iden-
tified at UCLA.
Topotypic Surveys. Primary emphasis will be given at the beginning to ob-
taining individual and/or progeny rearings of topotypic material of species de-
scribed from the area. It will also be necessary to obtain similar material of
species described from outside the area but reported from Middle America in
order to establish the true identity of the Middle American forms. Since in
many instances the type localities have been destroyed or are not accessible it
will be necessary to obtain this material from a similar habitat as close as
possible to the original type locality. In the course of topotypic surveys, as
conditions and resources permit, other species will be collected and reared.
General Surveys. Whenever possible general surveys will be started in
each country to sample as many different types of habitats as possible in all
the different regions, particularly those not previously surveyed. Any mate-
rial that can be readily obtained, as in connection with arbovirus studies or
malaria eradication projects, would be very valuable for this project.
Special Problems. In connection with taxonomic, dispersal or ecological
problems special intensive field work will be undertaken in selected areas.
Detailed information on the bionomics and ecological relationships of most
groups of mosquitoes in Middle America is lacking. Because of biogeographic
Significance particular attention will be paid to species occupying certain types
of habitats, notably crabholes, treeholes and leaf axils of plants. The specifi-
city of the association of mosquitoes breeding in the leaf axils of certain spe-
cies of plants is not well documented and will receive special attention also.
RESEARCH PROCEDURES
Personnel. The procedures described here have been developed primarily
for the UCLA staff and will be modified as necessary for special cooperative
studies. It is hoped that cooperators will participate in all the different types
of studies outlined below throughout the duration of the project.
Taxonomic Studies. The basic research on the project will consist of taxo-
nomic studies of various types, including the following: (1) preliminary re-
views of species groups, subgenera and genera, (2) descriptions of new forms
and previously undescribed stages, (3) thorough monographs of important
groups and (4) a reexamination of the entire fauna in connection with the final
book form publication. ;
The preliminary reviews will be based primarily on identified material
borrowed from major museums and whatever new reared topotypic material is
available early in the project. These reviews will serve as starting points for
later monographs and will provide provisional identification keys for use in the
field as well as inthe laboratory. It is planned to make preliminary reviews
of all groups, starting with the most conspicuous and simplest groups. For
such reviews at least one species will be completely illustrated in each group.
For the descriptions of new forms and stages, complete illustrations will be
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
made for each stage treated whenever feasible, and these will form the basis
for the monographs which will be undertaken only after topotypic material of
the majority of species is available.
Taxonomic Procedures. The general taxonomic procedures, terminology
and method of presentation will follow the pattern used in Mosquitoes of the
South Pacific (Belkin 1962). All taxonomic studies will be based on considera-
tion of all stages: males, females, larvae, pupae, and eggs whenever possible.
Slide mounts of whole adults, male and female genitalia will be prepared from
a sample of every collection. In addition to slide mounts of associated larval
and pupal skins, there will be prepared whole mounts of samples of larvae
from every collection.
For every species with associated stages and sexes preliminary drawings
will be made for the adults (entire external morphology or pertinent details),
and for the larvae and pupae (complete external morphology and complete
chaetotaxy for both), from material selected by the professional staff. Using
these preliminary drawings Research Assistants will check other material (10
or more specimens) of the presumed same species to record on special forms
the range of variation in the expression of all characters figured, in the same
population and in other populations. It is likely that at this stage undescribed
forms will become apparent. Distinguishing characters will then be selected
by the professional staff, and from these, keys will be prepared for all the
stages. All the material of a group will then be checked through the keys for
the diagnostic characters. It is likely that additional new forms will be found
in this process. The verbal description of each stage of a species will then be
prepared and significant ecological and geographical variants will be noted by
the professional staff. :
The final drawings and final descriptions will be made for the topotypic
population and will not be a representation of one individual only. Ecological
and geographical variant populations will be covered as fully as the material
and time will allow. Throughout the taxonomic work emphasis will be placed
on presentation of graphic and meristic data. Verbal descriptions will be lim-
ited to distinguishing and variable characters not amenable to graphic repre-
sentation. Attributes shared by species within a group will be given under the
description of that group. Keys will be prepared to adults, male genitalia,
fourth instar larvae and pupae and, when possible, to eggs and to other larval
instars and female genitalia.
In order to establish the identity of previously described species, it will be
necessary for the professional staff to study type specimens located in various
institutions in the Americas, Europe and North Africa. Material compared
with types will be so marked and deposited in the Research Collection at UCLA
for further study.
Distribution, Bionomics and Disease Relations. Information on distribu-
tion, bionomics and disease relations will be obtained from the literature,
from the records of previous collectors and from the standard collection rec-
ord forms (Belkin et al. 1965) which will be used in all the field work for the
project. Special field studies will be undertaken for the elucidation of signifi-
cant ecological and distributional problems (see FIELD WORK). All these
records will be reproduced by xerography and filed under both the individual
species and the various countries.
The following special outline maps will be drafted and reproduced for the
project: a general map of Middle America, sectional maps of Middle America
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America a
on a larger scale, and a map of the Western Hemisphere. The world map pre-
pared by Belkin (1962) will also be used. The entire known range of all species
will be plotted on appropriate combinations of these maps. Whenever feasible
the distributions of members of a group will be shown together on the same
maps.
All the information on distribution, bionomics and disease relations will be
summarized on (1) a chart of all the species for the entire area and (2) more
detailed charts for-each country.
Faunal Analysis. The analysis of the mosquito fauna will be based on a
comparison of the taxonomic affinities of the various species (determined pri-
marily on the basis of degree of morphological similarity in all stages) in dif-
ferent parts of Middle America and the distribution of species groups to which
these belong in adjacent areas in the Western Hemisphere as well as the world
as awhole. Charts will be prepared showing the composition and detailed dis-
tribution of the elements of the mosquito fauna (by species complex, species
group or higher unit) in the faunal subdivisions comprising the area.
PUBLICATIONS
Scope. Three types of publications will be produced: (1) periodic prelimi-
nary papers as the work progresses, (2) more thorough and extensive mono-
graphs and (3) a final definitive book of several volumes.
Authors. It is expected that many of the taxonomic papers will be joint
contributions of cooperators and UCLA staff members. Co-authorship will be
sought for all papers dealing with local mosquito faunas. Seniority in joint au-
thorship will be determined on the basis of actual contributions of respective
authors to the particular paper. Investigators are invited to use all the publi-
cation facilities (including illustration, composition and editing) for all per-
sonal papers dealing with the mosquito fauna of the area.
Illustrations. In all publications emphasis will be placed wherever possi-
ble on the use of illustrations of all kinds (drawings, tables, maps) in prefer-
ence to words. With the method of publication chosen it is more convenient
and just as inexpensive to use illustrations as a lengthy text. Facilities for the
preparation of final illustrations are available at UCLA to all cooperators.
For uniformity and economy reasons illustrations will be standardized and
erouped together on full pages for reproduction.
Method. Printing will be done by the photo-offset method. The text copy
will be prepared on an IBM Executive typewriter at UCLA under constant su-
pervision and control at the same time that the final illustrations are assem-
‘bled and labeled. This method of publication is the quickest and least expen-
sive, favors graphic presentation and allows maximum control of accuracy.
The actual publication and distribution will be done by the American Entomolo-
gical Institute through its established serial publications. Financing of publi-
cations will be accomplished by a minimal charge per page for the reprints,
which will be charged to the project in the case of cooperative studies and to
individuals or institutions in the case of independent contributions.
Preliminary Papers. The following types of papers will be published as
quickly as they can be prepared: (1) methods and techniques for collection,
rearing, preservation and preparation of material, (2) lists of mosquitoes
originally described and/or reported from each country, (3) provisional keys
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
to major groups of mosquitoes, (4) descriptions of new species and undescribed
stages, (5) taxonomic notes, synonymies, changes in taxonomic status, etc.,
(6) preliminary reviews of species groups, subgenera and genera, (7) new lo-
cality records, (8) notes on bionomics, (9) collection records for field work in
each country and (10) special short studies. The majority of these papers will
be published periodically in the series 'MOSQUITO STUDIES," edited by Bel-
kin and issued as separate numbers of the Contributions of the American Ento-
mological Institute as in the present instance. Very quick and economical pub-
lication can be obtained as soon as at least 64 pages are prepared for printing
for an individual issue.
Monographs. Thorough studies on important taxonomic groups, disserta-
tions of Research Assistants working on the project, major faunal studies and
extensive special studies of various kinds, if they will print 300 or more
pages, will be published as Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute.
Book. Upon completion of the project a book of several volumes covering
the mosquito fauna of the entire area will be published. The general plan will
follow the treatment in the Mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Belkin 1962). The
emphasis in the taxonomic section will be on illustration, tentatively-a full
page each for (1) the adults and the female genitalia, (2) male genitalia and pu-
pa and (8) the larva.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are most grateful to the following individuals and organizations for as-
sistance, cooperation and encouragement in carrying out the project to date:
ARGENTINA: Antonio Martinez, San Isidro, Buenos Aires.
BRAZIL: L. Deane and O. Forattini, Universidade de Sao Paulo.
CANAL ZONE: W. P. Murdoch and M. Keenan, Office of the Surgeon,
USARCARIB. :
CHILE: L.vEBi Pena G., Santiago.
COLOMBIA: E. Osorno-Mesa, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica; R. El-
liott and G. Ruiz, Servicio Nacional de Erradicacion de la Malaria; C. J. Ma-
rinkelle, Universidad de Los Andes; P. Barreto-Reyes and V.E. Lee, Univer-
sidad del Valle and The Rockefeller Foundation, Cali.
COSTA RICA: G. Havord, Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas;
F. Granados and G.W. Hunter, International Center for Medical Research and
Training, LSU; J. De Abate and M. Vargas, Universidad de Costa Rica.
FRANCE: E. Abonnenc, Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique
Outre-Mer (ORSTOM).
FRENCH GUIANA: H. Floch, Institut Pasteur.
GUADELOUPE: P. Fauran, Institut Pasteur.
GUATEMALA: J. Ibarra, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural; E. Novales
and O. Ochoa, Servicio Nacional de Malaria; M. Dary R., Universidad de San
Carlos; D. McCorquedale, AID; R. Jenney, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana;
L. M. Drennan, B. J. Diaz,, T. A. Holcombe and C.E. Pinto, United Fruit Co.
HONDURAS: A. C. Hamilton and F. Sheehy, Tela Railroad Co.
JAMAICA: A. Goodbody and W. Page, University of the West Indies.
MEXICO: L. Vargas and A. Diaz Najera, Instituto de Salubridad y Enfer-
medades Tropicales; R. W. Dickerman, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana.
NICARAGUA: L. Izquierdo, AID; D. Massi, Oficina Sanitaria Panamerica.
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 13
NETHERLANDS: P.W. Hummelinck, Foundation for Scientific Research in
Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles; J. Bonne-Wepster, Instituut voor Troo-
pische Hygiene en Geographische Pathologie.
PANAMA: P. Galindo V. and A. Quinonez, Gorgas Memorial Laboratory.
PUERTO RICO: I. Fox, School of Tropical Medicine.
TRINIDAD: T.H.G. Aitken and L. Spence, Trinidad Regional Virus Labo-
ratory.
UNITED KINGDOM: P. F. Mattingly, British Museum (Nat. Hist.).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: H.K. Townes, American Entomological
Institute; E. G. Gerberg, Insect Control and Research, Baltimore, Md.;
H. Friedmann, C. L. Hogue and F. 8S. Truxal, Los Angeles County Museum;
R. B. Allen, J. A. Kerr and L. J. da Silva, Pan American Health Organiza-
tion; S. J. Carpenter, Sonoma, California; A. Stone, U.S. National Museum;
F. Iltis and R. O. Schuster, University of California, Davis; B. Bartholo-
mew, G. A. Bartholomew, K. Bartholomew, M. Buchanan, E. Fisher, T. R.
Howell, M. Lloyd, M. E. Mathias, S. R. Telford and D. Verity, University
of California, Los Angeles; F. 8. Blanton, University of Florida; A. Spiel-
man, School of Public Health, Harvard University; L. E. Rozeboom, School of
Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University; J. K. Jones, University
of Kansas; G. F. Edmunds, University of Utah.
VENEZUELA: P. Cova-Garcia, Direccion de Malariologia, Maracay; O.M.
Suarez, Instituto Venezolana de Investigaciones Cientificas; I. Ortiz C., Insti-
tuto de Higiene.
REFERENCES CITED
Anduze, Pablo J.
1947. Contribucion al estudio de los vectores de la fiebra amarilla en
Venezuela. Acad. de Cien. Fis. Mat. y Nat., B. 10: 331-378.
Belkin, John N.
1961. Unstable tropical mediterranean areas as sites of origin of major
evolutionary changes. Ent. Soc. Amer., B. 7: 164.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Berkeley,
U:. Calif. Press.’ 2 vol.
Belkin, John N. and C. L. Hogue
1959. A review of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites (Dip-
tera,’ Culicidae)::: Calif. U.{°.P? Ent: 147 421-458.
Belkin, John N.j 'C.. L.cHogue, PP. Galindo, T.°H. G, Aitken, ‘Ry xX Schiek
and W. A. Powder
1965. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae) II. Methods for the collection,
rearing and preservation of mosquitoes. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contrib.
2: 19-78.
Belkin, John N. and W. A. McDonald
1955. A population of Corethrella laneana from Death Valley, with des-
criptions of all stages and discussion of the Corethrellini baie Culi-
cidae). South. Calif. Acad. Sci., B.. 54: 82-96;
1956. A population of Uranotaenia anider from Death Valley, with a des-
cription of all stages and a discussion of the complex (Diptera, Culi-
cidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 49: 105-132.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.,>\vole 1, no. 2, 1965
1957. A new species of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) from treeholes in southern
Arizona and a discussion of the varipalpus complex (Diptera, Culicidae).
Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 50: 179-191.
Bonne, C. and J. Bonne-Wepster
1925. Mosquitoes of Surinam. . . Roy. Colon. Inst. Amsterdam, Meded.
2b. -958' p.. (Afd. Troag. Hyg. 13).
Carpenter, Stanley J. and W. J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley, U.
Calif. Press. 360 p.
Cova-Garcia, Pablo
1961. Notas sobre los anofelinos de Venezuela y su identificacion. Ed. 2.
Caracas, Editora Grafos. 212 p.
Dyar, Harrison G.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Washington, Carnegie Inst.
(P..387), 616 p.
Fauran, Pierre
1961. Catalogue annote des Culicides signales en Guyane Francaise. Inst.
Pasteur de la Guyane Franc. et de I'Inini (Arch. 22) P. 465. 60 p.
Foote, Richard H.
1954. The larvae and pupae of the mosquitoes belonging to the Culex sub-
genera Melanoconion and Mochi aby tak U.S, Dept. Aer. « Tech. B,
1091. 126 p.
Forattini, Oswaldo P.
1961. Chaves para identificacao de genero Anopheles Meigen, 1818, da
Regiao Neotropical (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev. Bras. de Ent. 10: 169-
187.
1962. Entomologia Medica. Sao Paulo, Facul. de Higiene e Saude Publi-
ca. 662 p.
Galindo, Pedro, F. 8S. Blanton and E. L. Peyton
1954. A revision of the Uranotaenia of Panama with notes on other Ase
can species of the genus (Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann.
47: 107-177. ,
Hill, Rolla B. and C.dicD. Mill |
1948. The mosquitoes of Jamaica. Inst. Jamaica, B. (Sci. Ser.) 4. 60p.
Howard, Leland O., H. G. Dyar and F. Knab
1912-1917. The mosquitoes of North and Central America andthe West
Indies. Washington, Carnegie Inst. (P. 159). 4 vol. Vol. 1 (1913);
Vol. 2 (1913); Vol, 3, 1913; Vol. 4, 1917. |.
Komp, William H. W.
1936. An annotated list of the mosquitoes found in the vicinity of an en-
demic focus of yellow fever in the Republic of Colombia. Ent. Soc.
Wash., Proc. 38:.57-70.
1942. The anopheline mosquitoes of the Caribbean Region. Nat. Inst.
Health, B. 179. 194 p.
Kumm, Henry W., W. H. W. Komp and H. Ruiz
1940. The mosquitoes of Costa Rica. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 20: 385-422.
Kumm, H. W. and H. Zuniga |
1942. The mosquitoes of Salvador. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 22: 399-415.
van der Kuyp, Edwin
1954. Mosquitoes of the Netherlands Antilles and their hygienic impor-
tance. Studies Fauna Curagao Caribbean Islands 5: 37-114.
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 15
Lane, John
1953. Neotropical Culicidae. Sao Paulo, Univ. Sao Paulo. 2 vol.
McDonald, William A.
1957a. The adults and immature stages of Aedes mulleri Dyar (Diptera:
Culicidae). Ent. Soc: Amer., Ann. 50: 505-511.
1957b. The adults and immature stages of Aedes purpureipes Aitken (Dip-
tera: Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 50: 529-535.
McDonald, William A. and J. N. Belkin
1961. Orthopodomyia kummi new to the United States (Diptera, Cdliedae))
Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 62: 249-250.
Martini, Eric C. W.
1935. Los mosquitos de Mexico. Mexico, Dept. de Salubr. Publica. 65p.
Patino-Camargo, L.
1940. Artropodos hematofagos de la fauna colombiana. Acad. Colombiana
de Cien. Exact. Fis. y Nat., Rev. 3: 337-344.
Perez Vigueras, I.
1956. Los Ixodidos y Culicidos de Cuba, su historia natural y medica.
Havana. 579 p. :
Rozeboom, Lloyd E. and W. H. W. Komp
1950. A review of the species of Culex of the subgenus Melanoconion (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 43: 75-114.
Simmons, James S. and T. H. G. Aitken
1942. The anopheline mosquitoes of the northern half of the Western Hemi-
sphere and of the Philippine Islands (Distribution, habits, identification,
importance as vectors, and control). Army Med. B. 59. 213 p.
Stone, Alan
1961. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement I.
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 63: 29-52.
1963. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement I.
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 65: 117-140.
Stone, Alan, K. L. Knight and H. Starcke
| 1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culici-
dae). Washington, Ent. Soc. Amer. (Thomas Say Found. P. 6). 358 p.
Tulloch, George S.
1937. The mosquitoes of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico, U., J. Agr. 21: 137-
167.
Vargas, Luis
1956. Especies y distribucion de mosquitos Mexicanos no anofelinos (In-
secta Diptera). Inst. de Salubr. y Enferm. Trop., Rev. 16: 19-36.
1959. Lista de Anopheles de las Americas y su identificacion por carac-
teres masculinos (Diptera: Culicidae). Inst. Salubr. y Enferm. Trop.,
Rev. 19: 367-386.
Vargas, Luis and A. Martinez Palacios
1956. Anofelinos mexicanos. Taxonomia y Distribucion. Mexico, Sec. de
Salubr. y Asistencia. 181 p.
sopeqieg 9%
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
epnuiiag =
16
oyedtew
.
ew.
2G
sosedeley
T-$961 -.LN4-TOOZ-VION :
SATIN ALNLY.LS
0O0T 008 "2009" - = 007
VoOIdIWV JIGCIW
Map of Middle America
the
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America
ARG
Argentina 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BAH
Bahamas 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BAR
Barbados 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BG 65
British Guiana 66
Mosq Mid Amer
BGR
British Guiana
LE Rozeboom leg
BH
Br Honduras 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BOL
Bolivia 64-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BRA
Brasil 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BRR
Brasil
LE Rozeboom leg
CH
Chile 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
COR i
Colombia 64-65
INSP, Bogota, OM
COE
Colombia 64-65
SEM, MSP,Elliott
COL
Colombia 64-65
Univ: Valle Cali
equinus
Theobald 69
MosqMidAmer &
MosqMidAmer o
soperi
Levi-Castillo 65
MosqMidAmer &
tropicalis
Cerq & Ant 65
MosqMidAmer o
albomaculatus
Theobald 6S
MosqMidAmer &
LOCALITY LABELS
CR
Costa Rica 1964
Charles L, Hogue
CRR
Costa Rica
LE Rozeboom leg
CUB
Cuba
Mosq Mid Amer
CV
Villavicencio,Col
Rozeboom 47-48
CZ
Canal Zone 63/64
W.P.Murdoch, leg
DOM
Dominica 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
ECU
Ecuador 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
FG
Fr Guiana 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
FGA
French Guiana
E Abonnenc leg
FWI 64
Fr West Indies 65
Mosq Mid Amer
GAL
Galapagos 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
GG
Panama 158
Gorgas Mem Lab
No, (CR)
Costa Rica
XI, 7-XII, 11, 62
Hogue & Powder
GG
Panama '58
Gorgas M_ Lab
GR
Grenada 1963
T. H, G, Aitken
GRR
Grenada
LE Rozeboom leg
GUA
Guatemala 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
HAC
Haiti (Cook)
LE Rozeboom leg
HAR
Haiti
LE Rozeboom leg
HAT
Haiti 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
HON
Honduras 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
JA
Jamaica 64/65
William A, Page
KO
W. H. W. Komp
LAR
Lesser Antilles 29
LE Rozeboom leg
LEE
Leeward I 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
Panama
leg, Carpenter
LU
St Lucia 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
MEX
Mexico 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
MF
Mexico 63/64
Eric M, Fisher
MT
Mexico 1963
S. R. Telford
MX
Mexico
NI
Nicaragua 1964
Gorgas Mem Lab
NIR
Nicaragua
LE Rozeboom leg
NWI 65
Neth West Indies
Mosq Mid Amer
PA
Panama '63
Gorgas M_ Lab
PA
Panama 63/64
Gorgas Mem Lab
PAR
Panama/CanZone
Rozeboom 34-37
PC
Panama/CanZone
S. J. Carpenter
Panama,
School
Reo
Lot
Army
Malar.
Arnett
IDENTIFICATION LABELS
albonotatus
Coquillett 6S
MosqMidAmer o
allotecnon
K, K & Ruiz 65
MosqMidAmer &
arborealis 65
Bon-We & Bonne
MosqMidAmer o
argyrites 65
Dyar & Nun Tov
MosqMidAmer &
aurivittatus
Cerqueira GS
MosqMidAmer o
Fig. 2. Locality and Identification Labels
andinus
Levi-Castillo @
MosqMidAmer
asulleptus
Theobald GS
MosqMidAmer o
durhamii
Theobald 65
MosqMidAmer 6
flavisetosus
Castro
MosqMidAmer o
guayasi
Levi-Castillo 65
MosqMidAmer &
chidesteri
Dyar
MosqMidAmer o
corniger
Theobald oS
MosqMidAmer do
coronator
Dyar & Knab 65
MosqMidAmer o
declarator
Dyar & Knab 65
MosqMidAmer &
delys
HD&K 65
MosqMidAmer o
PER
Peru 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
PR
Puerto Rico 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
RDO - 65:
DominicanRep 66
Mosq Mid Amer
ROZ
LE Rozeboom leg
SAL
El Salvador 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
SUR
Surinam 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
TOB
Tobago 65
Mosq Mid Amer
TR
Trinidad 63/64
T. H. G. Aitken
TRR
Trinidad 1941
L. E, Rozeboom
VI
Virgin Islands 65
Mosq Mid Amer
VT
St. Vincent 1963
T. H. G. Aitken
VZ
Venezuela 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
VZR
Venezuela 64-65
LE Rozeboom leg
cancer
Theobald 69
MosqMidAmer &
mcdonaldi 65
Belkin & Hogue
MosqMidAmer o
melanophylum
Dyar & Knab 65
MosqMidAmer &
annulipalpis 65
Lynch Arribalz
UCLA-ZOOL oo
apicimacula
Dyar & Knab 65
UCLASZO0L: ff
17
bis
Hier ons
a
Ha,
a,
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
II. METHODS FOR THE COLLECTION, REARING
AND PRESERVATION OF MOSQUITOES!
By
John N. Belen” Charles L. one” Pedro Gaiee.
Thomas H. G. Aken. Robert X. Schick and William A. Bower
: This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service Grant
AI-04379, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; in
part by U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Department
of the Army, under Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-2478; and in part by
National Science Foundation Research Grants G-18961 and GB-2270; part of
the field studies were made in connection with the Public Health Service Train-
ing Grant TI-AI-132.
Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 90024.
: Los Angeles County Museum, Exposition Park, Los Angeles, Calif. 90007.
Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Panama, R. de P.
> Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory, P. O. Box 164, Port of Spain,
Trinidad.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
CONTENTS
TUEEGOMOUON ei eke ee sce ut ce ha ea ee wh fe 8 22
COLLECTION ACCOR wit ne ta eee ee eee 22
COME CUCU OT: oe Lk wevkein dante’ Retour ied ene) 22
Collection Code and Number (Lot) ....... 23
Locality and Related Information. ....... 23
Gereral Buvironmenm 4 we a a 24
Tate SINC G ee ea eee ee 25
PRC ee a a ge Ss 25
Remarks. . ee ioe ee ee ey
PS oN ep ek ae ara Be a es as 25
MG | REATINGS oe eo Be ee oe os 25
Labeling Ae ha ims ala Oe aes eR ae gah ade a 26
re hee te ene a cg aT
eCOCTIO Oi ANIA ai be eats coi ce he 27
UO Oe a ye eee Bee 27
RO a ee ais pipet whine 2s aa: 27
Raillne And OtOrine. Ges bros a ry ee 27
IsOmtine for Oviposition. oo 8 Se 28
Collecting and Recording ©. 20656 be eae 28
Collection of Immature Stages’... .0s.. 256 e. 31
eG i eh ee oe ee Bs ot
Coblbectine and Recording fro K ee ee a 31
Collecting Eggs and Dry Material. ....... SH
Transporting COLIGEIIONS O20) eis ee Ma 33
BPeeGine O1cOS sy ce i lie ee a ee ae as 34
Height of Breeding Site Above Ground ..... 45
Ve ee ee a oe ao 45
Vegetation in Breeding Site. . . 26. 6. ek. 45
EMOTO a La Gk ae 45
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 21
MmCIGCHLal VOLLOC TIONS fe oe ge ae ee 46
Sorting-and Hearing. Oe er ad a ae
PACIBICS ANG: MONI DME ie ooo ee es ke Ges ages eg 47
Care of Collections and Sorting i006 29s VOR. 47
Washing WOontaitere oo ae oe oe aoe 50
Organization of Laboratory aaa Se 20
MESS DCAVINGS Co oie sy ag wn ee eae she es D1
naividual Reapiness 20 ee ee Oe, D2
PUDAUION VALS ao ae eee wes 53
Emergence Vialevand Cages 28) 40 oe aie, D3
Roldine..Vigls and Caoee oe ee ku es 54
Progeny Rearing ie son | ee ae 54
Pie HOATIas | cis. yi io oe Ai sla oc eee a oT
Rearings from Dry Material. .... re Bee Df
BOCCIC| PAY INOS ou. ce cial 5 peo a gee es 08
Killing and Preservation ones 457 eh aes aS 08
EPQUIpDMeNE ANd SUMDHOS a i ee: Fo ae eee o8
Field Collecte@Aqulte vie wy ees, 08
POLES Lh COMO Ly gia \eres yee h we te dee ae a Oe
Reared Adiwts: cua Via ea Ta Se 60
Whole. Larvae and: Pupae, - pecs Me a ee 61
OATS se Se Ee re eee 62
Incomplete: Bearings . 5 scg a ee a oo wee 63
EPCOS uA One ee ee 63
PLOPING,. PACKING ANC MBGIIDING i402 ee hg ee: 64
COINS ESO Ae Re gos Pees epee 64
PACKING ANG DEIQOINE oo ee le ile a 65
Outline’ of Procedures Seti eee ee, aR 65
GHOS GAT se ee ee a ee Ne a eae 67
MGLerences Cited” Ve Fae ii eae Jon eR 14
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of this paper is to provide uniform methods for the
collection, preservation and rearing of material for the project ''Mosquitoes of
Middle America" (Belkin et al. 1965) but the methods discussed are general
enough to be applicable in similar studies in other areas. No attempt is made
to present an exhaustive review and discussion of the multitude of techniques
which have been used successfully by hosts of investigators for various speci-
fic problems. The emphasis here is on methods suited for obtaining mosquito
material for taxonomic studies of a general survey nature. Essential for this
type of study is a large amount of uniformly prepared material with all the sta-
ges individually associated, general information on bionomics and conspicuous
environmental factors and a sample from as many habitats as possible over a
wide geographic range. Important considerations in selecting the methods and
techniques adopted here have been simplicity and suitability for use under field
and laboratory conditions in the tropics and standardization and simplification
of records and labeling to minimize errors and to save time. A great deal of
effort and experimentation has been put into developing these techniques and
record forms. A variety of equipment, forms and methods have been tested
for several years in Middle America, the United States, the South Pacific is-
lands and New Zealand before arriving at the recommendations presented here.
A special effort was made to use light weight and compact equipment and sup-
plies suitable for transportation by air and at the same time rugged enough to
take abuse. We beg the indulgence of experienced laboratory and field investi-
gators for presenting and describing in detail many elementary procedures but
we have found through experience that most of these are not understood or fol-
lowed even by trained technicians with the result that much valuable material
is lost.
We are most grateful to the following individuals for many important sug-
gestions and/or for testing the equipment and methods in the field: E. Osorno-
Mesa, D. Forsyth, P. F. Mattingly, A. Quinonez, S. Ramalingam, D. Schroe-
der, S. Sirivanakarn, and J. and T. Gavortink.
COLLECTION RECORDS
COLLECTION FORM. A standard form (fig. 1) for recording all the data
pertaining to a collection has been developed for field work in Middle America
but it can be used anywhere in the world. The front of the card is primarily
for recording information on the collection itself, the back for recording the
individual rearings.
The form must be filled out in the field as completely as possible and the
remainder added in the laboratory. A soft pencil (no. 2, 2.5 or equivalent)
should be used for all entries. All measurements should be indicated in the
metric system; if miles, feet or inches are used, the metric abbreviation (m)
should be crossed out and the appropriate nonmetric unit clearly noted. There
is a minimum of writing to be done (only in lined open spaces) on the form, the
rest is to be done by circling or underscoring appropriate words or statements
or by placing check marks (V) or other signs in appropriate columns.
This collection form is intended to serve as a guide to the selection of pla-
ces and methods of collecting adults and immatures in the field and therefore
it is discussed in considerable detail below and in the following two chapters.
PS i
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 23
COLLECTION CODE AND NUMBER (LOT). Collections are identified (1)
first by a code of 2 or more capital letters designating the country, collecting
team or institution (2 or more codes are employed for one country when 2 or
more teams are operating simultaneously from different bases) and (2) second
by a collection or lot number. The collection numbers run ina regular se-
quence starting with 1 for every code. The collection number is used to iden-
tify all the material derived from that collection. It is usually subdivided into
sublots and individual numbers to identify groups or individuals within a given
collection (see SUBLOTS and INDIVIDUAL REARINGS). These subdivision
numbers are separated from the collection number by a dash or hyphen (-) to
the right of the collection number.
The standard collection form is used for a collection of immature stages or
for a collection of adults; the same collection number should never be given to
a mixed collection of adults and immature stages. However, a note should be
made under REMARKS indicating that the two collections were made in the
same locality. The single numerical sequence of lot numbers under the parti-
cular code is still followed irrespective of the type of collection, immature or
adult.
In the case of immature stages, a separate collection number is assigned to
every collection made from one individual breeding site, i.e. one ground pool,
one location in a Swamp, one crabhole, one treehole, one bromeliad, one pit-
cher, etc. Only rarely when the same and only one species is found in 2 or
more identical breeding sites should a composite collection be made; a note
should be made indicating this under REMARKS. In case of leaf axils or in-
florescences from a single plant, collections from individual inflorescences or
axils should be numbered separately if different species are suspected and a
notation made of the habitat differences.
In the case of adults, a separate collection number is assigned to every col-
lection in one specific site and for each specific type, i.e. biting and landing at
one site in a wooded area at a particular time of day, or from one trap, from
one crabhole, from one culvert, etc. Any composite collection should be ex-
plained under REMARKS. A collection of adults for progeny rearings must be
assigned a number distinct from any general adult collection made at the same
time and place.
LOCALITY AND RELATED INFORMATION. For the locality the specific
geographical location of the area where a collection is made must be indicated
so that the place can be readily found in the future. Reference may be made to
kilometer posts or distance from a settlement on a specified highway. Be as
specific as possible and if topographic or road maps are available indicate by
the collection number the locality as accurately as possible on the map. Asa
rule, several collections will be made in one locality and it may be necessary
to specify in more detail the exact location of each. The nearest town or set-
tlement that can be located on a map must be given and, as indicated above,
the distance (km) and direction (azimuth) of the locality in respect to the town
should be given. The district (county, parish, etc.) and the province (state or
other major division) and country should be given. The date and the name(s)
of the collector(s) must be written in for every collection. If the elevation can
be obtained from an altimeter or a map it should be given. Whenever possible
a photograph should be taken of the general locality and environment and of the
specific habitat, particularly in case of water-holding plants. The photographs
should be identified by the collection number written with grease pencil on a
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
card or large cardboard or other object and placed in an appropriate place in
the scene to be photographed. One photograph of a general locality may serve
for many collections. Indicate by a check mark in the collection form that a
photograph has been taken.
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT. For every collection, whether of immature
stages or adults, all the items in this section must be considered very care-
fully and all the applicable ones circled or underscored in each of the state-
ments 1 through 7. In addition, the information for statements 8, 9 and 10
should be filled in whenever the data are available. Any other pertinent infor-
mation should be given in the REMARKS section.
1. Woody plants. Included in this category are trees, shrubs, brush, woody |
lianas and arborescent forms such as bamboo; woody epiphytes are excluded
(see 3). The height scale is from 0 to 30 meters; indicate the height of the
woody plants by encircling the proper numerals to show the range. In the den-
sity scale: 0 represents total absence of woody plants; 1, low density as exem-
plified by trees in a park; 2, medium density as in open woodland where one
can walk through readily; 3, high density as in a dense forest impenetrable
without cutting or moving vegetation out of the way; indicate the density by en-
circling the appropriate numeral(s), taking into account intermediate conditions
and range of density.
2. Herbs and grasses. Included in this category are all non-woody plants
other than epiphytes (see 3), even such forms as banana "trees," heliconias
and terrestrial bromeliads; arborescent forms such as bamboo are excluded
(see 1). The height scale in meters and the density scale should be filled out
in the Same manner and using the same general criteria as for woody plants.
3. Epiphytes. An important element in the environment of mosquitoes in
the tropics are certain epiphytes which by virtue of the plant structure are ca-
pable of holding water often in considerable quantity; many species of brome-
liads fall in this category. In the density scale: 0 represents total absence; 1,
low density, a few plants per tree; 2, medium density, numerous plants; and 3, ©
high density, covering nearly all available space.
4. Edge effect. Some of the most productive environments for mosquitoes
are to be found along the edges of vegetation formations or artificial interrup-
tions such as paths, roads, dikes, canals. The edge of a vegetation formation
can be identified by the presence of many different types and species of plants
and may extend for several meters inward from the actual margin.
o. Water effect. The bulk of mosquito breeding will be found in the areas
surrounding permanent or temporary bodies or courses of water. Shore is
used here in the broad sense to include the belt of vegetation surrounding the
body or course of water such as the riparian environment around a stream bed,
draw or canyon bottom.
6. Human effect. Contrary to general belief, undisturbed environments are
not very productive except along edges. Human disturbance is a very impor-
tant factor in increasing the edge effect. Virgin vegetation is considered here
to be that which is not markedly affected by man or domestic animals. Clear-
ing refers to partially cleared forest and young second growth following clear-
ing. Grazing refers to disturbance due to domestic animals. A plantation is
a paktially or completely cleared area planted with woody crops. Cultivation
refers to cultivated fields or partially cleared areas planted with herbaceous
or grassy crops. A domestic environment is a rural or urban area immedi-
ately surrounding human dwellings and domestic animal quarters.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 25
7. Light. The amount of light or shade in the general environment of the
collecting site is an important factor and should be recorded in the general
terms indicated. |
8. Annual rainfall. Indicate the approximate mean annual rainfall in centi-
meters if reliable data are available. Give the data from the closest station if
not available from the locality itself; under REMARKS indicate the station.
9. Rainy season. Circle or underscore the months during which the bulk of
the precipitation falls.
10. Vegetation type. The specific type of vegetation in the area should be
given. For the area covered in the project on the ''Mosquitoes of Middle Amer-
ica, '' it would be primarily one of the following: tropical rain forest, subtrop-
ical rain forest, tropical deciduous forest, tropical montane forest (cloud for-
est), paramo, thorn forest, desert scrub, grassland, savanna, chaparral, pin-
yon-juniper woodland, pine barrens, temperate deciduous forest, montane co-
niferous forest; littoral (mangrove, saltmarsh). Alternately the system of
Holdrige (1947) may be used.
_ IMMATURE STAGES. This section is further discussed and explained in
detail in the chapter on COLLECTION OF IMMATURE STAGES. For each
collection, only one breeding site is checked by circling the number in the list
and underscoring, circling or filling in the appropriate description of the site
and for the conditions of the breeding site, i.e. height of the site above ground,
water, vegetation in breeding site and bottom.
ADULTS. This section is further discussed and explained in detail in the
chapter on COLLECTION OF ADULTS. For each collection the exact site of
collection is specified in detail and all the data are filled in, circled or under-
scored for type of collection (specify the type of light or other trap used),
height above ground, host or bait and time of capture.
REMARKS. Special notes, explanations or clarifications of data given else-
where on the form are recorded here.
SUBLOTS. This section is used to record the subdivisions of the material
obtained in one collection. In the case of a collection of immature stages the
sublot numbers (-1 to -9) are used to indicate the different species recognized
in the collection and to record for these species the material that has been pre-
served directly from the field collection or from mass rearings. Similarly,
the sublots should be used to identify the different species recognized in adult
collections. Sublots are also used to identify progeny that have been reared
from collected adults, a sublot being assigned to each individual parent female
with her mass-reared progeny. The female parent should be identified by a
capital P after the sublot number (e.g. -1P).
_ For each sublot write in the provisional identification (even if only to genus)
and indicate by check mark in the appropriate squares the preservation of L
(whole larvae), 1 (larval skins), P (whole pupae), p (pupal skins), M (males),
F (females), E (eggs). The material belonging to a given sublot is labeled
with the collection number (lot) followed by a dash or hyphen (-) and then the
sublot number, e.g. 50-1 and 50-2 for sublots -1 and -2 in collection 50.
Provision is made in the form for a total of 9 species (or 9 progenies) in
one collection. If more than 9 species (or parent females) are obtained in one
breeding site (or adult collection) then a second collection number (lot), pre-
ferably in sequence, with identical data and with cross reference is assigned
to allow the recording of the additional species (or progenies).
INDIVIDUAL REARINGS. The back of the card is used only to record in-
dividual rearings from field-collected immature stages or from progeny
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
rearings. The numbers are used to indicate individual specimens, the larval
skin (1), the pupal skin (p) and the corresponding adult male (M) or female (F).
Indicate by a check mark the stage preserved for each individual. Any stage
that is lost is marked by a zero (0); a dead larva or pupa or a drowned adult
preserved in alcohol is marked by.a cross (+). For a drowned, partially emer-
ged adult, place a check mark under ''p"’ anda cross under ''M" or "'F." The
species (or generic) name need not be written in at this time.
The three digit series (-100 to -114) is used for individual rearings made
from wild collected pupae which it is not practical to sort to species. The two
digit series are normally used for individual rearings from fourth instar lar-
vae (field-collected or from progeny mass rearings). The series -10 to -19
for species or parent female of sublot -1; series -20 to -29 for species or par-
ent female of sublot -2; series -30 to -39 for species or parent female of sublot
-3; and so on to series -90 to -98.
In case more than 10 individual rearings are desired for one or more spe-
cies, then one or more of the unused series may be employed for these, with
an appropriate notation in the species column that this is a continuation of a
particular series. The same applies when it is desired to rear individually
more than 15 field-collected pupae; any of the unused larval series may be used,
preferably the 90, 80, 70 and so on.
LABELING. All the material is identified only by numbers which refer al-
ways to the collection number (lot) entered on the collection form and its sub-
lot and individual subdivisions as applicable. The collection form contains all
the data pertaining to the collection and has a record of all the numbers. In the
field there is no need to write in on the labels the country or team code letters;
these should be clearly indicated later however before every shipment. The |
code will be shown on the permanent printed labels which will be attached to all
the material at the laboratory where the material is processed and mounted, at
UCLA for the project ''Mosquitoes of Middle America" (Belkin et al 1965, fig.
2).
All labels should be on durable bond paper (20 lb) and written with a soft
pencil (no. 2 or 2.5 or equivalent), never with ink.
For general collections (collections that are not subdivided into sublots)
write a label showing only the collection number (lot); prefix the number with
# or underscore it to eliminate confusion in numbers which can be read from
either end.
For material which has been subdivided into sublots, write a label showing
the collection number (lot) followed by a dash and then the sublot number,
e.g. 50-1, 50-2 (see section on SUBLOTS above). Each vial and pillbox must
have a label placed inside; never attach labels to the outside of containers.
For individual rearings, in order to save time, insure uniformity and min-
imize mechanical errors, use the printed individual labels provided for the
purpose. These labels are printed in columns ona sheet. Cut the sheet into
strips and keep strips of the same numbers in envelopes. The numbers cor-
respond to those printed on the back of the collection form to identify individ-
ual rearings. In the 100 series the numbers on the strips are in duplicate
(one for the pupal skin and one for the corresponding adult), in the 10, 20, 30
and so on to 90 series the numbers are in triplicate (one for the larval skin,
one for the pupal skin and one for the corresponding adult).
To mark individual rearings in a given collection: (1) prepare a full strip
of the proper series by writing in the collection number (lot) in front of the
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 27
dash or hyphen (-) preceding every individual number, (2) cut off a replicate
set of an individual number starting at the top of the strip as needed, (3) attach
the replicate set to the individual rearing container anchoring it under the lid,
(4) cut off an individual label from the replicate set to mark the skin(s) and the
adult as they are put in vials(s) or capsule; throughout the rearing there is al-
ways an individual label in a replicate set accompanying every stage to its ul-
timate preservation, (5) keep the strip of unused replicate numbers with the
corresponding collection form or mass-rearing sublot until all isolations are
completed then destroy the remaining part, (6) indicate by a check mark under
the appropriate number on the back of the collection forms all the individual
rearing numbers as they are being assigned.
FIELD BOOK. A small pocket notebook should always be carried in the
field and used as a diary to record all incidental and detailed information for
which space is not provided on the collection form. All the data on a particular
collection should be entered under the collection number. An engineer's field
book is particularly useful for this purpose because carbons of the notes are
made at the time of the original entries and such copies can then be attached to
the collection forms without recopying as would be necessary with an ordinary
notebook. When completed a field book should be preserved as a permanent
record of the field work.
COLLECTION OF ADULTS
EQUIPMENT. The basic equipment and supplies needed for the collection
of adults are: (1) aspirators, (2) aerial nets, (3) oviposition vials, (4) killing
tubes and jars, (5) plastic vials and plastic cups with caps and tissue paper,
(6) pillboxes, (7) flashlight (torch) and (8) a collecting bag fully equiped as in-
dicated in the GLOSSARY. Whenever possible, traps of various kinds, light
traps, animal-baited traps and space traps, should be used (see below).
CAPTURING. Mosquitoes may be captured while in flight by means of a net
with a fine nylon aerial bag. The apex of the bag is then held up with the hoop
and handle down and the mosquitoes allowed to go up into the "'top”' of the bag.
The killing tube is then introduced through the ring and placed over individual
specimens. Considerable damage to the specimens or loss of material may
result from this technique if too many individuals are captured at one time. In
such cases an alternate method is to drive all the specimens into the apex of
the bag by swinging the net carefully a few times, quickly pinching off the top
with the specimens with the fingers and introducing this portion of the net into
a wide-mouth killing jar, closing it over the upper part of the net with the lid
of the jar.
Resting mosquitoes are readily picked up into an aspirator one or a few at
a time and then transferred to a killing tube. It is always preferable to cap-
ture mosquitoes with an aspirator but it may not be practicable when very large
numbers are encountered.
It is also possible to place a killing tube directly over a resting or biting
specimen but to do this several killing tubes have to be used in relay and they
may have to be recharged repeatedly.
KILLING AND STORING. The most satisfactory killing tubes are charged
with chloroform but other killing agents may be used (see GLOSSARY). The
killing tubes should be used exclusively for mosquitoes and should always con-
tain strips of dry absorbent paper (tissue paper or paper toweling). When
these strips get damp they must be replaced with fresh dry ones.
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
The specimens must be removed from the killing tubes within 10 minutes
after being introduced into the tubes. The contents of the tubes are emptied in-
to a plastic vial or plastic cup (depending on quantity of material) containing
tissue paper or paper toweling on the bottom and more tissue paper is added on
top of the specimens. A separate plastic vial or cup is used for every collec-
tion number which is written in grease pencil on the outside as well as in pen-
cil on a slip of paper placed within. A small portion of the paper toweling or
tissue is slightly moistened to keep the specimens soft and relaxed; the lid of
the container must be carefully secured. It is best not to put the specimens in-
to pillboxes in the field; this should be done at the end of the day in the labora-
tory or living quarters (see chapter on KILLING AND PRESERVATION).
ISOLATING FOR OVIPOSITION. A number of species of mosquitoes which
are very common as adults are very seldom encountered as larvae and pupae
and the immature stages and breeding sites of some of these are not even known.
This is particularly true of the genera Aedes and Psorophora in Middle Amer-
ica. To obtain the immature stages of these it is necessary to isolate live in-
dividual females collected in the field, induce them to oviposit and to rear all
the stages from the eggs (see PROGENY REARINGS in the chapter on REAR-
ING AND SORTING). It is also frequently desirable to study the range of var-
iation in clones of important species using this technique for obtaining material.
Gravid or blooded females may be found in the field and should be isolated 1
to an oviposition vial. Some landing or biting females should be captured in
Oviposition vials after they are allowed to engorge to repletion. The cotton in
the oviposition vial should be saturated with water but not contain free water
and the vial must be kept out of direct sunlight. Cover the vial securely with
the plastic lid and mark the outside with the collection number in grease pencil.
COLLECTING AND RECORDING. Collect wherever mosquitoes are en-
countered but pay particular attention to situations showing the edge effect, wa-
ter effect and human effect, discussed in the preceding chapter. Recordall |
the data for every collection on the standard record form. First enter the lo-
cality and general information in the top section of the form as indicated in the
preceding chapter. Usually several collections will be made in one locality.
A separate collection number (lot) is assigned to every collection in a specific
site, of a specific type, at a specific height above ground, ona specific host
or bait, and at a specific time of capture (see below). When, because of un-
usual conditions, a composite collection is made, the circumstances must be
explained in the section on REMARKS. A collection of adults for progeny rear-
ings must be assigned a number distinct from any general adult collection made
at the same time and place.
Record all the appropriate items on the collection form in the section on
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT for every collection as indicated in the preceding
chapter. Then check every item in the section on ADULTS as discussed be-
low. These two sections serve as guides to the selection of places and methods
of collecting adults in the most productive environments. Any unusual condi-
tions such as rain, stormy weather, etc. should be recorded under REMARKS.
1. Site. The exact situations must be indicated, not the general environ-
ment. Describe also such things as the size of the crabhole, type of platform
in a tree, condition of the host or bait and so on.
2. Type. Indicate the type of collection by underscoring or circling one
and only one of the items listed. The most common collections are biting-
landing collections with the collector or an assistant serving as bait; it is
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 29
usually not possible to distinguish between landing and biting collections and
they are therefore regarded as one type. For these collections a protected
spot should be selected for a team of two men, one serving as bait, the other
one capturing the landing or biting mosquitoes; the bait will attract more speci-
mens if the shirt is removed or trouser legs or sleeves are rolled up. Excel-
lent collections can be obtained by a collector working alone. Different species
of animals may also be used as bait for biting-landing collections. Use an as-
pirator for capturing specimens and spend at least 30 minutes at a collection
site. If mosquitoes are extremely numerous it may be necessary to use the net
and wide-mouth killing jar technique. Nets are very handy also in the case of
many sabethines which are frequently very chary about landing and biting.
Swarming mosquitoes, consisting primarily of males, are sometimes en-
countered over bushes or various projecting objects, including the head of a
collector. Such swarms should be captured with a net, in toto if possible, and
careful notation made of all circumstances under the site.
Resting collections are made in a variety of habitats where mosquitoes nor-
mally concentrate during periods of inactivity. Almost any protected, cool,
shady spot may serve as a resting place, but the most productive sites of con-
centrations of resting mosquitoes are: buttresses of trees, hollow trees, un-
dersides of fallen trees, cavities in the ground, crabholes, animal burrows,
caves, banks of streams, draws or ditches (particularly with overhanging veg-
etation or dripping water), sides of waterfalls, dense mats or stands of herba-
ceous or grassy vegetation, axils, bracts and pitchers of waterholding plants
as well as on or under various structures such as bridges, culverts, drains,
pipes, barrels, boxes, bottles, cans, in barns, privies and in and under
houses. It is among resting mosquitoes that one will find the largest percent-
age of males and gravid and blooded females in the field. Search through all
the different types of resting sites; a flashlight will be useful in many dark
places. It is frequently necessary to disturb the site in some fashion to locate
the mosquitoes. Blowing tobacco smoke into small cavities, such as crabholes,
is helpful. Resting mosquitoes are generally collected individually with an as-
pirator, directly into oviposition vials or witha net. With crabholes, animal
burrows and similar cavities in the ground, resting mosquitoes may be driven
into a net placed over the hole and the bag held up by stamping around the hole
or prodding into it with a stick or aspirator. The specimens are then picked
up from the net with an aspirator or killed in a wide-mouth jar as indicated
above. The exact resting place collected must be specified on the form under
1. Site. Every type of resting place must be given a separate collection num-
ber (lot).
_ Sweeping collections are essentially collections of concentrations of mos-
quitoes resting in relatively open situations in grassy or herbaceous vegetation
or on shrubs, collected by sweeping a net above the vegetation after the mos-
quitoes are disturbed into flight by walking through or beating the vegetation.
They usually consist of recently emerged specimens of both sexes resting in
the vicinity of the breeding sites. The males of many species are most easily
obtained in this manner before they disperse or die. The most productive
areas for sweeping collections are along margins of streams, ponds and mar-
shes as well as in the interior of swamps and marshes and also in the neigh-
borhood of temporary pools in open situations as well as in wooded areas.
Care should be taken that the net clears the vegetation in sweeping, that it does
not get wet, and that only a small number of specimens is captured at one time.
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
The wide-mouth killing jar technique should be used for killing the specimens
(see above) unless only a few specimens are captured when an aspirator and
killing tube may be used. A portable screened chamber is useful for capturing
mosquitoes resting in grass (Zulueta 1950).
The term light collections refers to captures made at night at an artificial
light source of some kind. A variety of nocturnal and even diurnal species may
be attracted to these lights and this type of collection often includes a large per-
centage of males not readily obtained by other methods. All types of electric
lights, incandescent, fluorescent and ultraviolet (‘dark light"), are effective
attractants except for lights emitting longer wave lengths in the yellow and
orange range. Collections should be tried at various stationary light sources
in settlements, isolated houses and along highways. Mosquitoes should be
looked for on horizontal and vertical surfaces from near the light source to a
considerable distance away where relatively little light falls; some may be found
flying around the light. Portable light sources (battery-operated electric lights;
geasoline or kerosene lanterns) may be taken into the field and operated with a
sheet placed under the light and another hung vertically a short distance from
the light. Mosquitoes should be captured with an aspirator unless extremely
numerous in which case a net should be used. Various kinds of light traps have
been designed and widely used in many parts of the world, primarily in north
temperate regions. Light traps in general have not proved to be very effective
in most tropical areas for unknown reasons. Attempts should be made to de-
velop more effective light traps for these areas for they could be extremely |
helpful in obtaining certain nocturnal and crepuscular species. Not all light
traps are suitable for collecting mosquitoes for taxonomic studies as the speci-
mens may be in very poor condition in such traps as the most widely used ''New
Jersey" light trap and its various modifications (Mulhern 1953). The most
promising and potentially best suited light trap for taxonomic studies is the
"CDC miniature" battery-operated light for the capture of live specimens (Su-
dia and Chamberlain 1962). All collecting at lights or in light traps is strongly
influenced by atmospheric conditions and by moonlight. It is important there-
fore to make for every collection a notation as to the exact conditions under
which captures are made as well as the type of light or light trap used. Each
different collection should be given a separate number as with all other types
of collections. |
Trap collections are restricted here to captures with all types of traps ex-
cept light traps. Many different animal-baited traps have been designed but
the most useful ones for mosquito collecting in the tropics are the Shannon
trap (Shannon 1939, Forattini 1962: 603-607), the Magoon trap (Magoon 1935,
Bates 1944, Russell et al 1963: 298), the dawn trap (Shannon 1943, Earle 1949)
and the Trinidad no. 10 trap (Worth and Jonkers 1962). The captures in some
of these traps consist primarily of blooded females that do not make good mu-
seum specimens but which are very important as parent females for progeny
rearings. A sample of females should be isolated in oviposition vials and the
remainder killed and preserved. Other traps do not allow the females to feed
on the bait and material caught in these traps should be killed and preserved
directly. Traps baited with "dry ice’ (COg) have been used successfully in
several areas but are not practical for field use in most places in the tropics.
Recently the unbaited portable Malaise trap (Malaise 1937: 148-160; Gressitt
and Gressitt 1962; Townes 1963) has been used very successfully for sampling
many different types of flying insects and is particularly efficient in capturing
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 31
Diptera. It should be tried and adapted for mosquitoes and may capture noctur-
nal as well as diurnal species. With all trapping the selection of the site for the
trap is all important and such information should be included on the collection
form together with an indication of the specific trap used.
3. Height of collecting site above ground should be carefully recorded in me-
ters for all collections. Biting-landing and sweeping collections with collectors
standing at ground level are recorded as 0 meters. For biting-landing collec-
tions made above ground level, as on a platform ona tree, the exact height
above ground should be given. For swarms, resting, light and trap collections
the height at which mosquitoes are found should be entered.
4. Host or bait. The type and number of hosts or bait used in biting-landing
and baited-trap collections should be indicated.
5. Time of capture. The inclusive period during which the collection is
made should be entered, preferably on a 24-hour clock system. The time of
operation of a trap should be similarly indicated.
COLLECTION OF IMMATURE STAGES
EQUIPMENT. The basic equipment and supplies needed for the collection
of immature stages are: (1) dippers, (2) aquatic and dip nets, (3) mosquito
pumps and siphons, (4) pipettes and medicine droppers, (5) plastic, enamel or
porcelain sorting bowls, (6) plastic pans and buckets, (7) plastic cups with lids,
(8) plastic vials with lids, (9) plastic bags, (10) a water can or other large plas-
tic container with clean fresh water, preferably rainwater, (11) box, carton or
tray to hold filled plastic cups and vials and (12) a collecting bag fully equipped
as indicated in the GLOSSARY.
COLLECTING AND RECORDING. Because of the much greater percentage
of species that can be collected as immature stages as compared to adults the
emphasis in taxonomic surveys should be placed on the collection of immature
stages which can then be reared with relative ease in the laboratory to provide
definite association of both sexes and all stages.
The immature stages should be collected with great care to prevent injury
and should be provided with a sufficient volume of water and fine debris from
the original breeding site to insure adequate food supply for rearing. Larvae
and pupae are removed from the breeding site with the appropriate tool such as
a dipper, aquatic net, dip net, pipette, siphon or pump. Do not neglect to col-
lect small larvae. All immature stages are placed with ample water from the
breeding site into a plastic cup, sorting bowl, pan or bucket until the desired
number is obtained. Large debris is removed from the container and the sed-
iment (if present) is allowed to settle. Because pupation and emergence of
adults often occurs during midmorning and midafternoon while collections are
being made or transported it is very important to isolate in individual vials the
desired number of full grown fourth instar larvae (identified by dull opaque
bodies) and dark pupae. These individual vials are capped and carefully marked
on the outside with the collection number (lot) in grease pencil. The remainder
of the collection is carefully searched for predators and for carnivorous mos-
quito larvae; for recognition of carnivorous larvae see section on SPECIAL
REARINGS in the chapter on SORTING AND REARING, The latter must also be
isolated in individual vials. If a large amount of water is present, pour out
the excess through a fine-meshed dip net, invert the net and dip it into the
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
water which is retained in the container. The final collection should be placed
into one or more plastic cups about three-quarters full of water and containing
no more than about 200 larvae and pupae each. Cover carefully the plastic cups
with lids and mark each cup and lid on the outside with the collection number in
grease pencil. :
It is very important to wash carefully all pipettes, nets, dippers, etc. be-
tween all collections so that no transfer of larvae, pupae or eggs will take
place. It is obvious that some records of mosquitoes from unusual breeding
sites are due to inadvertent contaminations of this type.
Every collection from a specific individual breeding site should be assigned
a separate collection number. Record all the data for each collection on the
standard collection form indicating all the appropriate data for each of the items
in the section on IMMATURE STAGES. The data to be entered are discussed
below under BREEDING SITES, HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND, WATER, VEGE-
TATION and BOTTOM. Assign a number to the collection, enter all the data
on the top of the card for locality and general information and in the section on
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT. All this information must be given for every col-
lection even when several are made in the same locality.
In the section on BREEDING SITES below, all the principal types of breed-
ing sites utilized by mosquitoes are listed and this section will serve as a guide
to specific places to look for immature stages.
COLLECTING EGGS AND DRY MATERIAL. A rich but neglected source
of mosquitoes in general surveys are the eggs occurring in natural habitats.
For certain species, particularly in the genera Aedes and Psorophora, this —
forms the most dependable means of obtaining larvae, pupae and adults, es-
pecially during the dry season. An effort should be made therefore to collect
eggs in the field and to rear them in the laboratory. In addition, it is very de-
sirable to obtain more information about the eggs of mosquitoes since very lit-
tle is known at present, particularly about the eggs of species breeding in the
leaf axils and flower bracts of plants. It may be advisable to preserve some
of these eggs in the field (see chapter on KILLING AND PRESERVATION).
In those species utilizing permanent or semi-permanent collections of wa-
ter on the ground, eggs are laid usually on the water surface but sometimes
are attached to vegetation. In the former case, eggs are usually collected to-
gether with the larvae and pupae and will be included in the collection of these
stages if a dip net is used to filter the water and concentrate the debris from
the breeding site. However, a special effort may be made to locate egg rafts
or individual eggs of anophelines and to isolate these in vials for rearing.
These eggs may be picked up with a camel's hair brush or a strip of absorbent
paper such as paper toweling or filter paper. Certain species of Mansonia at-
tach masses, rosettes or ribbons of eggs to emergent or floating vegetation or
various objects at or below the water surface and sometimes even to the roots
of aquatic vegetation (see Horsfall 1955 for specific sites). Wherever Manso-
nia adults are collected, a search should be made for eggs in various perma-
nent bodies of water nearby. The egg masses should be removed together with
a piece of the vegetation and taken to the laboratory for rearing.
Species utilizing primarily temporary ground waters for breeding (Psoro-
phora and several subgenera of Aedes) lay eggs, usually individually, on moist
soil above the water level or in depressions without water at the time but where
flooding may subsequently occur. Larval development is usually very rapid in
these species and generally immature stages will not be found when only fe-
males are encountered in the field. In Such situations an attempt should be
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 33
made to collect eggs around the edges of depressions where water may have
been standing. Samples of the upper inch or less of the soil should be gathered
with a trowel or small shovel and placed in plastic bags or plastic cups to be
flooded later with water (see chapter on SORTING AND REARING). Eggs of
these species may also be collected during the dry season from likely areas,
particularly where adults may have been noted during the rainy season. All low
areas subject to periodic flooding should be checked as well as margins of semi-
permanent or even permanent ground waters subject to periodic fluctuation.
The presence of eggs in the soil may be checked in the field by flooding a sample
of the dry soil in a plastic cup; if eggs are present larvae will hatch usually
within minutes. Eggs of different species may be laid at different levels of soil
humidity so that a transect should be made from the lowest to the highest point
in the depression.
Many species utilizing treeholes and possibly other plant container habitats
(leaf axils, flower bracts, coconuts, bamboo, etc.) lay eggs above the water
level in the breeding site. The eggs of some of these species can withstand
desiccation and may survive long dry seasons when no water at all is found in
the breeding site. After collecting larvae and pupae in such habitats, the sides
of the treehole or other container habitat should be washed down several times
with water to dislodge any eggs that may be present. A considerable amount of
the debris at the bottom of the container should always be included with the wa-
ter taken for rearing. During the dry season one can usually identify treeholes
that may serve as breeding sites at the appropriate time by a water stain below
the lip of the hole. Debris from the bottom and scrapings from the sides of
such dry treeholes should be collected in plastic bags or plastic cups for rear-
ing. Dry debris from the basal axils of agave and some yuccas has also yielded
eggs of species of Aedes and it is possible that debris from leaf axils and flow-
er bracts may also harbor viable mosquito eggs.
All egg collections should be treated exactly like collections of other imma-
ture stages, given a separate collection number for every specific site and all
the information in the section on IMMATURE STAGES on the collection form
filled in the same way. In addition a notation should be made under REMARKS
indicating the nature of the collection.
TRANSPORTING COLLECTIONS. The various containers with immature
stages or adults collected in the field should be placed upright in boxes or car-
tons. Usually no difficulty is encountered and little or no mortality occurs if
some care is taken in transporting live mosquitoes in field vehicles. First,
the containers should be placed away from direct sunlight and excessive heat;
wet towels may be placed over and around the containers when high tempera-
tures are encountered. Second, drive carefully avoiding high speeds, sudden
stops and excessive bouncing. Third, stop periodically (every hour or so) for
10 to 15 minutes and check through the collections. Open the plastic cups to
relieve any pressure that may have built up and reseal the containers. This is
particularly important when changing altitude rapidly and at such times should
be done more frequently. Fourth, take care of any adults that may have
emerged.
Various special methods have been used for transporting larvae and pupae
but these are usually not essential if the above suggestions are followed. Col-
lections have been transported in a passenger car on trips of a week or longer
over very rough roads without special methods with practically no loss of ma-
terial.
34 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
BREEDING SITES. The list of breeding sites on the collection form pro-
vides a guide to the major types of specific habitats utilized by the immature
stages of mosquitoes. All the types should be checked in every locality being
surveyed. A separate collection number should be assigned to each specific
type and separate collection forms filled out for each one as indicated above un-
der COLLECTING AND RECORDING. In the present section all the different
types are defined and discussed in the order in which they are listed on the form
and suggestions are made for special collection methods that can be used to best
advantage. The list of sites begins with the most generalized habitats on the
ground and proceeds to the most specialized living plant containers. Any unu-
sual habitat not covered in the list should be specified along with all explanatory
remarks for other items in the section on REMARKS.
1. Pond, lake. This category includes all types of permanent or semi-
permanent bodies of standing water, natural or artificial, with a considerable
expanse of open area in the center. The distinction between pond and lake is
largely one of size. A lake is larger and usually fed by one or more definite
streams while a pond is small and largely fed by springs or seepages. Most
lakes are named on topographic maps while ponds have only local names if any.
Collections should be made at various sites and in different types of vegetation
around the periphery and also if possible in the central part. Each of these col-
lections should be given a different number and a note made under REMARKS
to indicate the exact site for each in addition to specifying the different condi-
tions of water, vegetation and bottom. Immature stages are most easily loca-
ted by trampling the vegetation and muddying the water. A dipper or a net can
then be used to pick up the larvae and pupae as they come up to the surface.
Along abrupt banks and where the vegetation grows in hummocks the immature
stages are generally concentrated along the edges of the vegetation; here a
quick plunge or a slow gradual depression of an inclined dipper against the edge
will capture many specimens. In more open situations sweeping through the
water with an aquatic net will be more rewarding.
No difficulty will be encountered in locating and collecting the immature
stages of most common and well known typical mosquitoes of the genera Ano- \
pheles, Bironella, Uranotaenia, Culex, Aedeomyia, Hodgesia, Culiseta, Fi-
calbia and occasionally Aedes. The general technique of handling these has
been discussed briefly above under COLLECTING AND RECORDING; the con-
centration technique is particularly important to obtain large numbers of imma-
ture stages and should always be used. However, certain forms common in
lakes and ponds require special attention to recognize, find and/or handle. :
These are discussed in the following paragraphs. '
Mansonia larvae and pupae will be found below the water surface attached to
floating vegetation or to stems and roots of emergent plants. To locate the
breeding sites of some of these, an aquatic net may be swept under the vegeta-
tion with a lifting motion and the contents emptied into water ina large pan or
bucket. For other Mansonia species either a bucket may be placed carefully
under a mat of floating vegetation and lifted out with the vegetation, or clumps
of floating vegetation may be carefully lifted and placed into a pan or bucket of
water. In either case the vegetation is then agitated vigorously to dislodge the
larvae and/or pupae and carefully examined piece by piece to locate them. The
debris settling at the bottom of the pan or bucket should also be carefully
searched for larvae and pupae. At the time of emergence, Mansonia pupae
float up to the water surface where they rest motionless in a horizontal position
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 35
apparently lifeless and quite unlike ordinary mosquito pupae and resembling the
pupae of chironomid midges. Breeding sites of Mansonia can be located some-
times by finding large numbers of cast pupal skins. Live Mansonia larvae and
pupae should be placed in plastic cups or individual plastic vials provided with
small discs of wet strength paper floating on the surface (see section on SPE-
CIAL REARING in chapter on SORTING AND REARING). Dark pupae should
be isolated in individual vials with a moist strip of paper toweling and no free
water. Some species of Ficalbia also attach to vegetation and should be treated
in the Same manner as Mansonia.
Chaoborus and Sayomyia larvae and pupae are frequently found in deeper
water in the more open situations away from shore. They should be collected
by sweeping rapidly a large aquatic net at several depths and also by bringing
up mud from the bottom. The net is then everted and washed in a shallow pan
of water. The larvae and pupae are practically transparent and difficult to lo-
cate even in a pan except after the sediment has settled when they can be rec-
ognized by their jerky motion as they float horizontally near the bottom of the
pan. Although carnivorous, Chaoborus and Sayomyia larvae may be left togeth-
er in a plastic cup as they do not feed on other mosquitoes.
Corethrella and Lutzomiops larvae and pupae also require special attention.
The larvae resemble short stubby Anopheles or Uranotaenia and rest parallel
to and just under the surface film. Some species are very easily disturbed and
when alarmed will sink and remain for long periods in the flocculent muck at
the bottom. The pupae float motionless on the surface film in a horizontal po-
sition and resemble seeds or chaff. As with Chaoborus it is not necessary to
isolate individual specimens of Corethrella and Lutzomiops since they do not
seem to be cannibalistic and probably also feed primarily on the larger micro-
organisms in the larval habitat.
Immature stages of Dixinae are commonly found in vegetation around ponds
and lakes and in other ground water habitats but are seldom collected because
they are not recognized as relatives of true mosquitoes. The larvae move back-
wards with a rapid looping motion of the bodies apparently on top of the surface
film and, when coming to rest against vegetation or shore margin, bend into an
inverted U with only the head and tail in the water and most of the body com-
pletely out of water. They frequently crawl out of the water completely but are
of course surrounded by a film of water. They can be dislodged from such sit-
uations by quickly pouring water from a dipper or splashing water on the shore
or vegetation and then are collected with a dipper or net. The pupae are found
with the larvae resting against edges with the long abdomen hanging straight
down. After capture Dixinae immatures are handled like true mosquitoes.
2. Ground pool. Included in this category are all kinds of collections of
standing water on the ground that are primarily of a temporary nature, whether
natural or artificial. Some of the larger ground pools may be semi-permanent
as in the case of borrow pits around roads and railroad embankments, along
irrigation dikes and in irrigation overflows. Ground pools may also be formed
in depressions after water recedes from overflows of ponds, lakes and streams.
A large ground pool is considered to be one 5 meters or more in the largest
dimension and a small ground pool of less than this diameter. A very common
type of small ground pool are ruts made by vehicles in dirt roads. Ground
pools should be looked for in open areas, in grassy areas and in second growth
wooded areas; each of these general environments will yield different species
of mosquitoes. A special category, 5. Flooded forest, is considered sepa-
rately below because it is seldom collected and may have species of special
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
interest. Belonging in the same category with ground pools are also 3. Animal
tracks.
Collections in ground pools are easily made with dippers, dip nets, aquatic
nets or even directly with pipettes. The mosquito fauna consists primarily of
species of Aedes and Psorophora but in the larger and in semi-permanent pools
i et
Corethrella, Lutzomiops, Dixinae and even Mansonia may be found. For the
latter four groups see the discussion under 1. Ponds, lakes above.
3. Animal tracks. Tracks made by animals in low lying and marshy areas
in the open as well as in woods are productive breeding sites particularly dur-
ing the rainy season. The immature stages may be captured directly with a pi-
pette or with a dipper or small dip net. The latter is particularly useful as it
captures specimens more quickly and concentrates food. Although the mosqui-
to fauna of animal tracks consists primarily of temporary pool breeders (Aedes,
Psorophora), at times it includes species normally breeding in permanent ha-
bitats (Anopheles, Culex, Uranotaenia, etc.).
4. Swamps. As understood here this category includes marshes as well as
swamps of all types,i.e. permanent or semi-permanent areas of wet ground,
more or less uniformly covered with standing water but without extensive areas
of open water. A wide variety of special types of sites are usually present in
Swamps and all the different situations should be checked by collecting along a
transect from the edge to the center. All the groups mentioned under 1. Pond,
lake are usually represented in Swamps, frequently by species peculiar to these
habitats. Of particular interest are some mosquitoes that breed in areas so
choked with vegetation that no water at all is apparent until one sinks into the
mat overlying the water. Areas of this type with low vegetation, found around
the periphery of some Swamps are the marshy depressions mentioned on the
collection forms.
Collecting in swamps is often difficult because of the density of the vegetation
and it is often necessary to cut down the tall vegetation with a machete, trample
the remaining stubs and muddy the water before the immature stages can be lo-
cated. Frequently peculiar species will be found localized in small pockets of
water and at the edges of hummocks of vegetation. Swamps are particularly
rich in species of Mansonia.
). Flooded forest. A common temporary ground pool habitat seldom col-
lected is the flooded forest floor. In the Solomon Islands and New Guinea the
larvae of several species of very common Aedes previously unknown in the im-
mature stages were found in this type of habitat. Frequently the water is very
shallow and intermittent; apparently some species complete their development
during a series of floodings, surviving in the mud or decaying vegetation as
larvae or pupae between floodings. This type of habitat should be thoroughly
investigated as a possible source of species of Aedes and Psorophora still un-
known in the immature stages. |
6. Seepages and springs. Sources of flowing water serve as breeding sites
for many species of mosquitoes which may be restricted to this type of habitat.
The following forms are frequently encountered: Dixinae, Anopheles, Bironella,
Chagasia, Uranotaenia, Culex and Culiseta. Depending on the depth of the wa-
ter, pipettes, dippers and dip nets may be used to capture the immature sta-
ges. Springs and seepages in caves are of particular interest and should be in-
vestigated more thoroughly than they have been in the past.
7. Wells. These artificial sources of clean fresh water harbor a Gaeta
fauna very similar to that found in seepages and springs (see above). Species
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 37
of Chaoborus and Sayomyia may also be present. Here dip nets and even aqua-
tic nets may be used in addition to dippers for capturing the immature stages.
The sides of wells frequently serve as resting sites for adult mosquitoes.
8. Streams. Streams of all sizes and types should be investigated thorough-
ly for they serve as breeding sites for many species of Dixinae, Anopheles, Bi-
ronella, Chagasia, Uranotaenia, Culex, Aedeomyia (occasionally), Hodgesia,
Culiseta, Ficalbia and sometimes Mansonia. Most immature stages will be
found in the vegetation or against the banks of the stream but species vary a
great deal in their preference with respect to strength of the current and some
may even be found along the edges of boulders in the swiftest part of the cur-
rent. Pools on the sides of a stream or in a drying stream bed are also very
productive. A special type of site which often contains concentrations of im-
mature stages of many species will be found upstream from blocks across the
stream where flotage and debris accumulate.
9. Ditches and drains. These artificial channels of flowing water provide
habitats very similar to those found in some types of streams and harbor a
very similar but more restricted mosquito fauna. The smaller drains resem-
ble seepages and springs and are often contaminated with organic domestic
wastes. Canals of all types should be included in the category of ditches and
drains.
10. Fountains, gutters. These are artificial collections of running water
with concrete bottom and usually without conspicuous large vegetation. A lim-
ited but significant mosquito fauna of domestic, quasidomestic and some wild
species utilize this habitat, particularly species of Culex and Anopheles. The
immature stages may be captured with dippers, dip nets or pipettes.
11. Crabholes. Holes made by land crabs (Gecarcinidae) and fiddler crabs
and related forms (Ocypodidae) are normally utilized for breeding and resting
by a large number of species of the genera Deinocerites, Culex and Aedes and
a few species of Uranotaenia. The genus Deinocerites and several Old World
subgenera of Aedes (notably Cancraedes, Geoskusea and Levua) are practically
restricted to crabholes. Representatives of other genera and subgenera may
be occasionally found in crabholes. Some crabhole species are sometimes
found in treeholes and artificial containers and not infrequently in temporary
ground pools in an area where crabholes are present. There appears to be lit-
tle or no specificity of association of a given species of mosquito with a parti-
cular species of crab. However, crabholes of different size and in different
environments harbor different species of mosquitoes, although two or more
species are often found in one hole. Consequently, a separate number (lot)
should be assigned to the material obtained from each individual crabhole.
Crabholes containing mosquitoes have been found in and along the edges of man-
grove swamps, on the banks of streams, rivers and lakes near the sea and even
inland (Lake Valencia in Venezuela) and from hillsides. Generally the water in
the crabholes is fresh or only slightly brackish and is not subject to flooding by
tides. Rainfall affects markedly the suitability of crabholes for mosquito breed-
ing and this undoubtedly accounts in part for the seasonal differences in the dis-
tribution of crabhole mosquitoes. Therefore collections should be made at all
time of the year and from all types of crabholes.
Some crabholes are shallow and the immature stages in these can be read-
ily seen at the water surface. In the majority of crabholes, however, the wa-
ter surface is from a few inches to 2 meters or more below the ground surface,
i.e. at the level of the water table, or approximately at the level of the water
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
in the nearby swamp, river or lake. Not all crabholes contain immature sta-
ges, usually only those in which adults are resting. The presence of adults can
be determined by blowing tobacco smoke, prodding with a stick or aspirator or
stamping on the ground if it is solid. These adults should be collected with an
aspirator as they return to rest in the hole, as they invariably do within sec-
onds, or if many are present by inverting an aerial net over the hole and driv-
ing them up into the apex of the net. These adult catches should be preserved
and given their own collection number but with a crossreference to the collec-
tion of immature stages from the same hole.
The easiest way to capture the immature stages is with a mosquito pump.
The end of the rubber tube of the proper diameter attached to the pump cham-
ber should be carefully inserted into the crabhole until it hits the bottom. It
should then be raised slightly so that it does not become clogged with sand or
debris. The one-way rubber bulb attached to the other opening of the pump
chamber should then be squeezed repeatedly until the chamber is filled or all
the water drawn up. Do not overfill the pump for this may clog the bulb. The
rubber tube is then withdrawn from the crabhole and the rubber stopper con-
necting it to the chamber removed from the pump as well as the bulb together
with its fitting. Now one or more plastic cups, as needed, are filled about
three-quarters full of water from the pump chamber using the large opening.
The rest of the water is poured through a dip net bag to recover the immature
stages and to concentrate the food and debris. The bag should then be inverted
and dipped several times into the water in the plastic cups to wash off all the
material. Crabholes become quickly refilled with ground water and should be
pumped out repeatedly until all the immature stages are recovered.
A record should be made of the size of the crabhole; a large one is arbitra-
rily designated as being 5 centimeters (2 inches) or over in diameter for the
purpose of our records. The species of crab should be determined if possible
and all information on the condition of the crabhole should be recorded.
Other animal burrows or cavities in the ground partially filled with water
may serve as breeding sites for mosquitoes, as has been found to be the case
for a number of species of Aedes in Australia (Marks 1957). Any potential
breeding sites of this type should be investigated with the aid of a mosquito ©
pump.
12. Rockholes. Holes in various types of rock in a variety of locations
serve as specific breeding sites for a number of mosquitoes of the genera Ano-
pheles, Culex, Uranotaenia and especially Aedes. These sites may also be
utilized by some general ground water breeders in the same genera as wellas
some Dixinae, Bironella, Culiseta and Haemagogus. The most common types
of rockholes are in various types of rocks (sedimentary, igneous or metamor-
phic) along the sides of streams, and pot holes in boulders in or around the
stream bed. Similar types of holes with quite a different fauna are found along
the seashore. Holes in volcanic or coral rocks in various locations, often away
from streams or the seaside, may also serve as breeding sites for mosquitoes.
The immature stages are readily captured in all these sites with a pipette, dip-
per or dip net depending upon the size of the hole. Occasionally a pump may be
useful to empty a deep narrow rockhole. Since the food is frequently rather
limited in these habitats the contents of rockholes should be stirred up vigor-
ously after the immature stages are captured and added to the water in the
plastic cup after filtering through a dip net bag. souls debris, sticks, leaves
and so on, should be removed however.
SI Re OO Oe AAT Fy POI a EA,
ee Sake es
SO OE RP ETE SR EE eg, a Ne eS Se Sein Rae
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 39
13. Artificial containers. Many species which normally breed in natural
containers such as treeholes, bamboo, fallen plant material and apparently
even those that breed in leaf axils and flower bracts may utilize various types
of artificial containers. Some ground water breeders may utilize large artifi-
cial containers. When conditions are suitable, populations in artificial contain-
ers may be extremely high.
Any man-made object that will hold water may serve as an artificial breed-
ing site, ranging from water tanks, disused swimming pools and boats to tires,
tin cans, bottles, cups and saucers, flower vases and canvas. Collections from
different containers should be kept separate and given individual collection num-
bers. It is important to note the size of the container (a large one is arbitra-
rily defined to container 10 liters (2 and one half gallons) or more of water) and
all the conditions indicated on the collection cards within and outside the con-
tainer since this information may help to locate the natural breeding sites of
some species collected to date only in artificial containers.
With small containers, the immature stages may be poured directly into a
plastic cup after stirring the contents. When more water is present the im-
mature stages and larvae may be concentrated by pouring most of the water
through a dip net bag and washing this off into a plastic cup. For the very large
containers, dippers or dip nets should be used and care must be taken to take
along some food and debris with the water.
14. Treeholes. The term treehole is used here for all types of water ac-
cumulations in standing and usually living trees, primarily in rotholes but also
on the surface of the trunks, buttresses or aerial roots. The deep rotholes,
often with very narrow horizontal openings, are the most specific type. A very
large number of species are restricted to breeding sites in treeholes, includ-
ing representatives of Anopheles, Uranotaenia, Culex, Culiseta, Ficalbia, Or-
ee ee
nan TE
Wyeomyia, Sabethes, Toxorhynchites and Corethrella. Many additional species
may occasionally use large treeholes for breeding. The water in treeholes is
usually temporary, but at least some types of treeholes (tree wells) appear to
contain water throughout the year even in areas with very limited rainfall.
Treeholes do not seem to be abundant in areas where epiphytes are common,
probably because the latter become established in rotholes soon after they ap-
pear. However, it is possible that some treeholes are hidden between epi-
phytes in tree crotches or at the base of branches. Very little information is
available about the specificity of the association of mosquitoes with a particu-
lar species of host tree but it is likely that a considerable degree of specificity
for at least some forms will be shown eventually as is evident now with bamboo
which is accordingly treated separately below.
Relatively few species of plants harbor treeholes suitable for mosquito
breeding and considerable time has to be spent searching for these. All parts
of the tree should be carefully examined. Some rotholes have very narrow
openings which appear to form at the point of origin of a branchlet ona large
branch or main trunk. Frequently a rothole can be spotted ona tree by a
stain indicating overflow of water from its rim. The presence of biting adults
of species known to use treeholes is also indicative of treeholes in the vicinity.
Water in treeholes is frequently so dark that it is difficult to determine the
presence of immature stages by direct inspection in the breeding site or even
by a careful search in the water removed with a pipette into a deep container.
40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no,. 2; 1965
The following technique is suggested for all treehole collections in order to re-
cover as much of the material as possible, including eggs. If the opening into
the treehole is very small it should be enlarged with a knife to the width of the
cavity below. The sides of the hole above the water line should be scraped and
washed with a strong stream from a pipette filled with treehole water.
If the treehole is small (arbitrarily defined as one containing less than 1 li-
ter (quart) of water) an ordinary collecting pipette or preferably a battery pi-
pette should be used to remove all the water into a container of a suitable size.
Clean fresh water is then poured into the treehole, the contents thoroughly agi-
tated and all the water and debris removed with the pipette and added to the ori-
ginal collection. Some of this water is used to fill one or more plastic cups
three-quarters full. The remainder of the collection is now poured through a
dip net bag for concentration, the water itself being saved to refill the treehole.
To determine the presence of immature stages or to sort them, the concentrate
in the dip net bag is transferred to a plastic bowl or pan containing clean fresh
water by immersing and agitating the inverted bag. Large chunks of debris,
leaves, sticks, etc. are picked up, washed in the bowl and discarded. After
the inspection or sorting is completed, the water and all the material from the
bowl is poured through a dip net bag again and the concentrate washed into one
or more of the plastic cups containing some of the original water from the tree-
hole.
If the treehole is a large one (containing 1 liter (quart) of water or more) a
small or large mosquito pump should be used to remove the water employing
the technique of pumping described above under 11. Crabholes. The rest of
the procedure outlined above should be followed to concentrate the collection
except that some of the excess water from the first pumping may be used to
wash the treehole for the second pumping. Upon completion of the collection
all the excess water should be returned to the treehole and fresh clean water
used to fill it.
Every collection from each individual treehole should be given a separate
collection number (lot) and notation made on the collection form of all data per-
taining to each. Occasion may arise to collect in the same treeholes at a later
date, particularly if an unusual form is discovered. The scientific or common
name of the tree should also be noted. .
As indicated above in the section on COLLECTING EGGS AND DRY MA-
TERIAL debris should be collected from dry treeholes if there is any indica-
tion that they may have held water at some time.
15. Fallen trees. Accumulations of water in depressions on fallen trees
are utilized by a variety of species for breeding. Apparently very little speci-
ficity exists for this type of habitat but accurate information is needed on this
point. Both container and ground water breeders have been noted from fallen
trees. The techniques of capturing discussed under treeholes and large artifi-
cial containers should be used.
16. Bamboo. The mosquito fauna of bamboo is essentially similar to that of
treeholes in general on the generic level but it is evident that there is a great
deal of specificity for bamboo by many species, groups and subgenera. Includ-
ed with bamboo should be other arborescent or large grasses commonly called
reeds (Phragmites). In general in any one area the specific bamboo breeders
are to be found only in the bamboo indigenous to that area. Two markedly dif-
ferent types of habitat in bamboo are apparent: (1) cut or broken bamboo wheth-
er standing or fallen, provides sites for the general container breeders and the
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 41
less specialized bamboo fauna and (2) internodes of uncut bamboo with small or
medium-sized holes made primarily by insects (Macdonald 1960: 136-146) har-
bor a specialized and unique fauna. Species of the following genera are known
ee
ee
rhynchites and Corethrella.
Collecting in cut, broken or fallen bamboo is readily accomplished with a
battery pipette or small mosquito pump as in treeholes (see). For uncut inter-
nodes the entrance hole or holes may be enlarged to introduce the rubber tube
from a small mosquito pump. Alternately the culm may be cut above the hole
but this destroys the breeding site and preferably this should be avoided. <A
careful search should be made for uncut internode breeding sites in bamboo
shoots and culms of different age and with different size entrance holes for
there may be great specificity in the utilization of sites in this respect by dif-
ferent species of mosquitoes. Collections from each internode should be given
separate collection numbers (lot) and all the specific information about each re-
corded carefully.
Since breeding sites in uncut bamboo internodes are difficult to find it is
suggested that artificial ''worm" holes be bored with a brace and bit in culms
of different age. These artificial breeding sites should be marked with a wax
pencil and checked periodically for breeding.
17. Animal containers on ground. A few species of mosquitoes have been
found breeding in water collections inside the empty shells of land snails in the
Old World tropics but apparently this potential habitat has not been checked ex-
tensively in the New World. Other animal remains with accumulations of water
should also be checked. Whenever the shell or remains can be identified the
name of the animal should be given.
18. Fallen leaves, fronds, spathes. Large leaves, fronds and flower
spathes (particularly palms) lying on the ground accumulate water which is used
as breeding sites by a large number of species of the genera Culex, Uranotae-
nia, Zeugnomyia, Armigeres, Aedes (several subgenera), Eretmapodites,
Tripteroides, Trichoprosopon and Limatus. Immature stages from such sites
are easily collected with a pipette or by pouring the contents directly into plas-
tic cups after thoroughly agitating the water to wash off any eggs that may be
stranded above the water surface. With the larger fronds and spathes the con-
tents should be concentrated first in a dip net bag as with treehole material
(see). Care should always be taken to treat the contents of each site as a sep-
arate collection and a note made of the exact nature of the container, if possi-
ble indicating the species of plant. |
19. Fallen fruits, nuts, rinds. Many kinds of fruits and nuts with fibrous,
woody or stony layers fallen on the ground frequently collect water which is
known to be used for breeding by a large number of species of the genera Ura-
notaenia, Culex, Armigeres, Aedes (several subgenera), Haemagogus, Trip-
teroides, Trichoprosopon, Wyeomyia, Limatus. The most common breeding
sites are in coconut shells and coconut husks. The water in the plant container
should be agitated and poured into plastic cups. It is advisable to wash the con-
tainer with fresh clean water and to save this also. The type of container
should be noted and a careful record made of the water condition, particularly
with respect to the amount and type of organic matter present.
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
20. Attached fruits. Occasionally water collects in opened nuts or pods
which remain attached on trees. Rat-eaten cacao pods are known to breed
mosquitoes in the South Pacific islands and possibly similar breeding sites will
be found elsewhere. The contents should be agitated and poured off into a plas-
tic cup, the inside of the nuts thoroughly washed and the wash water added to
the original contents. The type of fruit should be specified as well as a notation
made about the nature of its contents.
21. Leaf and frond axils. Many species of monocotyledonous plants, both
herbaceous and woody, hold for long periods of time a considerable quantity of
water in the leaf or frond axils and petiole bases. These water holding plants
have a unique and very large mosquito fauna with representatives of the major-
ity of genera including Anopheles, Uranotaenia, Culex (Several subgenera), Fi-
calbia, Orthopodomyia, Eretmapodites, Armigeres, Aedes (several subgenera),
a sg i eee
em i nn ees 4
Limatus, Sabethes, Toxorhynchites and Corethrella. Nearly all the species
utilizing these sites are restricted to them. Only a few species, particularly
on small islands, may utilize other container sites and a few introduced con-
tainer breeders occasionally invade leaf axils. The specificity of the associa-
tion of a mosquito species with a host plant species varies considerably but has
not been thoroughly determined. It appears to be greatest with host plants
which secrete a substance into the axil water which makes it slimy or gelatinous.
Any plant containing water in its axils should be examined for mosquito
breeding but especially members of the following groups: pandanus family
(Pandanus, Freycinetia, Sararanga), sedges (Gahnia); palms (many genera; es-
pecially young plants and Nipa and Sago palms), arum family (Colocasia, Alo-
casia, Xanthosoma, Dieffenbachia, Montrichardia and probably many other
plants resembling taro and elephant's ears), bromeliads (the entire family Bro-
meliaceae including the edible pineapple), lily family in the broad sense (Dra-
caena, Cordyline, Collospermum, Astelia, Sansevieria, Smilax and probably
many others), amaryllis family (Crinum), banana family (Musa, Strelitzia,
Heliconia, Ravenala, Phenakospermum), ginger family (Zingiber, Curucuma),
arrowroot family (Calathea, Maranta). In general only native plants will be
found to contain native mosquitoes; introduced, cultivated or ornamental plants
normally do not breed any mosquitoes but occasionally may breed introduced
species.
The amount of water necessary for breeding is sometimes negligible and
larvae have been found in leaf axils of native bananas where only a slimy muck
could be recovered. In general, larvae in axils cling to the plant very closely
and in some species are known to crawl from one axil to another. Considering
this, great care should be taken in collecting and also in cleaning collecting
tools, pipettes especially, between collections to prevent contamination.
Very little is known about the specificity of breeding sites on a single host
plant but it appears that water and light conditions are frequently different in
axils in different parts of a plant and it has been noted that different species
may be present in upper and lower axils. Therefore an effort should be made
to keep collections from different axils separate if this can possibly be done.
The location of the breeding site with respect to the ground is also important.
It should also be noted whether a plant is epiphytic or terrestrial and the height
of the epiphytes above the ground noted. For tall terrestrial plants the height
of the axil above ground should be indicated also.
The method of collecting must be adapted to the type of plant. Epiphytic
plants, such as bromeliads, should be carefully dislodged from the tree and
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 43
lowered to the ground. All the extraneous debris is then carefully removed,
washed and discarded and the leaves are cut to just above the level of the water
and discarded. The plant is then carefully inverted into a clean bucket to re-
move the axillary water; some of this water is used to fill one or more plastic
cups three-quarters full.. Each leaf base, starting from the bottom of the plant,
is peeled off and washed in a pan of clean fresh water. The axillary water ac-
cumulating in the bucket and the wash water from the pan are then poured
through a dip net bag which is then inverted and washed several times into the
plastic cups to dislodge the immature stages and fine debris.
The same procedure may be followed for a terrestrial bromeliad by cutting
off the plant at ground level or pulling it out carefully from the soil. If this is
not possible, then the leaves are trimmed in place and a pipette is used to with-
draw water from the axils into a container of suitable size from which one or
more plastic cups are filled three-quarters full. Next, the upper (central) part
of the plant is cut out a little at a time and the leaves washed in a pan of clean
fresh water until the base is reached. Any water accumulating in the lower ax-
ils as this is being done should be pipetted out and placed with the original col-
lection. The final concentration of the material is done the same way as above.
The same technique is recommended for recovery of immature stages from
terrestrial and epiphytic liliaceous plants as well as grasslike pandanus. A
less laborious method in which the plant is not destroyed but which results in
the loss of many larvae, is to withdraw the axillary water directly with a bat-
tery pipette into a plastic cup or some other suitable container. The axils
should be washed repeatedly with fresh water.
With heliconias, young bananas and similar musaceous plants the flower
stalks if present should be cut off first and examined for mosquitoes as indica-
ted in the next section. The leaves are then all cut off carefully above the wa-
ter line in each axil starting with the highest and discarded. If there is any
visible water in the axils it is removed with a battery pipette and used to fill
one or more plastic cups to the usual level. The plant is then cut off from the
ground below the lowest axil containing water after all the soil around it is
carefully scraped away. Next, place the whole plant into a large empty bucket
without inverting and peel off each leaf starting from the base. One leaf at a
time should be removed and washed in a pan of clean fresh water and examined
carefully for larvae and pupae that may cling to it. The axillary water accu-
mulating in the bucket is used to fill the plastic cups as needed; the rest after
removal of large debris (be careful to wash it off) is passed through a dip net
bag along with the wash water from the pan and the concentrate placed in the
plastic cups in the usual manner.
, With aroids and palms it is usually possible to collect immature stages
without destroying the plant by withdrawing water from the axils directly with
a battery pipette into a plastic cup or some other suitable container. Care
should be taken to wash the axils repeatedly with fresh clean water. For some
aroids, and palms as well, it may be necessary to use the longer method out-
lined for terrestrial bromeliads above.
For large, woody pandanus the leaves must be carefully cut above the water
line and then the first method suggested for the aroids and palms used. Im-
mature stages in pandanus lianas (Freycinetia) are readily collected directly
with a battery pipette or even a smaller ordinary pipette but again it is essen-
tial to wash repeatedly with fresh clean water to recover all the immature
stages.
44 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
Whenever possible the plants should be photographed and a record made of
the flower size and color for identification purposes. Inflorescences (fresh or
dead) as well as a specimen of leaf should be collected as herbarium specimens.
Indicate on the collection form the name of the plant if known.
22. Flower bracts, spathes. Flowers or inflorescences with large horizon-
tal bracts or spathes containing water provide breeding sites for a considerable
number of species of mosquitoes of several genera. The majority of plants
with flower breeding belong to the banana family (Strelitzia, Heliconia and Piie-
nakospermum especially), gingers (Zingiber, Curcuma) and arrowroots (Cala-
thea, Maranta) but others have been reported (Sapria in-the Rafflesia family).
To collect the immature stages, the inflorescence (flower stalk) is cut off and
the bulk of the water is removed with a pipette of appropriate size to a plastic
cup. The inflorescence is then placed in a pan of clean fresh water and each
part is separated and carefully washed. The large debris is removed before
the wash water is filtered through a dip net bag. The concentrate is then added
to the water in the plastic cup in the usual manner. As in all other collections
the material from each inflorescence is given a separate collection number.
The name of the plant should be recorded in the blank space provided on the
form and if possible a photograph taken. For specific identification of the plant
inflorescences (fresh or dead) as well as a specimen of leaf should be collected
as herbarium specimens. Several immature flowers should also be preserved
in alcohol or formalin in a plastic vial.
23. Pitcher plants. The most specialized and unique breeding sites for mos-
quitoes are in the pitchers of carnivorous plants of the genera Sarracenia (New
World) and Nepenthes (Old World). The latter has representative species of
mosquitoes of nearly all the Old World genera which utilize container habitats
and all of these (some doubtful exceptions) are restricted to Nepenthes. In the
New World only 2 species of Wyeomyia are known from Sarracenia (eastern
North America) but species of the related pitcher plant genus Heliamphora are
known from the Guiana highlands (British Guiana and Venezuela) and may serve
as a breeding site for other sabethines. Pitcher plants of the genera Darling-
tonia (California and Oregon) and Cephalotus (southwestern Australia) apparent-
ly are not used by mosquitoes although they have not been thoroughly studied.
The immature stages in pitcher plants are not easily seen for the larvae are
sluggish and remain in the bottom of the pitchers. To collect them the pitchers
should be carefully detached, emptied of their contents and thoroughly washed
with clean fresh water which should be added to the collection. Collections from —
different pitchers should be kept separate and given individual collection num-
bers (lots). Notation should be made of the species of plant and of the condition
of the water. Care must be taken not to destroy whole colonies of pitcher plants,
some of which are protected by law. :
24. Traps. Immature stages of a number of species of container breeding
mosquitoes may be obtained in bamboo pots, i.e. sections of bamboo internodes
filled with fresh clean water and placed on the ground or suspended in suitable
protected spots at different heights in clumps of bamboo or intrees. Species
otherwise difficult or impossible to collect may be recovered in this way. Dif-
ferent types of bamboo traps should be used to simulate natural breeding sites,
some completely open, others with small lateral openings, some cut from young
ereen shoots of varying length, others from older woody culms. The water in
the pots should be checked and periodically refilled to dislodge eggs laid above
the water level. As suggested above in item 16, holes may be bored in live
bamboo culms to produce artificial breeding sites.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 45
Other types of traps, (such as wooden tubs of water set out in the forest),
should be tried also, particularly during the dry season in areas where adults
of the desired species are abundant. A notation should always be made of the
type of trap used. Collections from individual traps should be kept separate
and assigned individual numbers.
HEIGHT OF BREEDING SITE ABOVE GROUND. This should be indicated
in meters for all collections in treeholes, bamboo, fallen trees, attached fruits,
leaf axils and flower bracts, aerial pitcher plants and traps located above
eround.
WATER. The condition of the water in every breeding site must be care-
fully determined and all appropriate items indicated by circling, underscoring
or writing in.
1. Permanence. Permanent breeding sites have water present throughout
the year; this can usually be determined by the presence of true aquatic plants
in case of ground water habitats; crabholes, pitcher plants and the larger bro-
meliads and astelias usually contain permanent water. Semi-permanent breed-
ing sites have water throughout most of the year but dry up by the end of the dry
season for a month or longer; many Swamps and the margins of lakes and ponds
are semi-permanent; some container habitats, particularly large treeholes and
the leaf axils of large bromeliads are semi-permanent. Temporary habitats
are characterized by the presence of water for only short periods of time; most
temporary ground pools are filled by rainwater but dry up quickly and lack aqua-
tic and semi-aquatic vegetation; most container habitats (small treeholes, bam-
boo, leaf axils, etc.) have temporary rainwater.
2. Clarity. Indicate for all breeding sites whether the water is clear or
turbid and if it is colored note the color. :
3. Movement. For ground water sites indicate whether the water is stag-
nant or if it shows a slow, moderate or strong flow. :
4. Salt content. Indicate for ground water sites if the water is fresh, brack-
ish or salty.
5. Organic contamination. For all sites, particularly small containers, if
the water is foul smelling, contains gelatinous or slimy material, or has fer-
menting organic material (e.g. decaying coconut meat) underscore the appro-
priate item.
VEGETATION IN THE BREEDING SITE. This section applies primarily
to habitats on the ground. Check all the items and indicate the appropriate
ones by circling or underscoring.
1. Abundance. Indicate the relative abundance or total absence of all types
of vegetation and surface debris.
2. Small surface vegetation and debris. Indicate the presence of (1) flo-
tage, i.e. floating sticks, chaff, leaves, (2) bacterial scum, (3) algae of all
kinds.
3. Large vegetation. Indicate all types of conspicuous vegetation present
in the site. Grassy vegetation includes all types of grasslike forms, herba-
ceous indicates forms such as cattails, sedges, rushes, etc. and woody, pri-
marily shrubs andtrees. For floating vegetation write in the name (water let-
tuce, water hyacinth, water lily; if known give the scientific name). Do the
same for submerged vegetation (pond weed, filamentous algae, etc.).
BOTTOM. For all breeding sites indicate the presence and nature of the
following materials in the bottom: 1. Inorganic material, whether it is mud,
sand, gravel or rock. 2. Organic material: specify the type of decaying plant
matter (leaves, sticks, fine sediment) and the type of decaying animal matter
(feces, urine and domestic wastes).
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
INCIDENTAL COLLECTIONS
It may be possible for individuals not engaged specifically in a mosquito sur-
vey to make valuable collections of mosquitoes while in the field but without the
time, equipment and facilities required for the type of collections mentioned in
the preceding two chapters. The basic equipment necessary for such incidental
collecting would be 2 or more killing tubes, an aspirator, a folding aerial net,
a supply of plastic pillboxes with paper toweling or cellucotton, a medicine
dropper, a medium sized pipette, a battery pipette, 2 or more plastic cups with
lids, a supply of plastic bags, a supply of shell vials with 80% ethanol, absor-
bent cotton, entomological forceps, label strips and a supply of collection forms.
Wherever adults are encountered (for specific places see chapter on ADULT
COLLECTIONS) they may be collected directly into killing tubes or gently blown
from the aspirator into the killing tube after collection with the net or the aspi-
rator. Mosquitoes should not be left in killing tubes for longer than 30 minutes
and it is important that the tissue paper strips in the tubes be replaced as soon
as they show evidence of moisture. After completion of a collection, fill out
the collection form as indicated in the chapter on ADULT COLLECTIONS.
Empty the killing tubes on a smooth clean surface in a place protected from
strong air currents. Using the entomological forceps place the adults carefully
in a plastic pillbox between layers of paper toweling or cellucotton (for details
see chapter on KILLING AND PRESERVATION). Write out the collection num-
ber (lot) on a strip of paper and place the label in a separate layer above the
specimens. Several collections may be preserved in one pillbox but be sure to
mark these carefully. Pillboxes should be stored in a dry place and care must
be taken that they are tightly closed. Use adhesive tape to seal them.
Wherever immature stages are encountered (see chapter on COLLECTION
OF IMMATURE STAGES for specific sites) they may be captured directly with
an ordinary pipette or a battery pipette or they may be dipped out of the water
with a plastic cup by gradually lowering the cup around edges or by quickly
scooping in more open situations. Transfer the immature stages with a pipette
to a plastic cup with fresh clean water, serially through several cups if much
sediment is carried over. Then kill the larvae and pupae by transferring them,
one or a few at a time, to the shell vials containing 80% ethanol. To avoid di-
luting the alcohol excessively, use a medicine dropper and squeeze out most of
the water while holding the dropper against a finger. Place no more than about
5-10 larvae or pupae into one vial depending upon their size. Insert a small
loose plug of cotton into the vial above the immature stages (not touching) after
they drop down to the bottom and place a label with the collection number above
the cotton plug. Make sure that the immature stages are not trapped between
the walls of the vial and the cotton. To speed up killing of immature stages
place the vial, before and/or after transferring the larvae and pupae, into di-
rect sunlight. Fill out the collection form carefully as indicated in the chapter
on COLLECTION OF IMMATURE STAGES. Pay particular attention to col-
lecting in container habitats (treeholes, crabholes, rockholes, plant axils and
bracts, pitcher plants, plant parts on the ground and so on) for the largest
number of species and the most interesting forms will be found there.
When dry treeholes that might serve as breeding sites are encountered,
collect debris from the sides and bottom into plastic bags. Place a large label
with the collection number inside the bag.
For storage and shipment of material follow the suggestions in the last
chapter.
:
:
f
3
i
j
j
q
‘i
:
f
¥
i
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 47
SORTING AND REARING
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. A large cool room with electricity, run-
ning water and several tables or laboratory benches serves very well as a sim-
ple laboratory for mosquito rearing. The room should be ant-proof but if it is
not, the legs of the tables or benches should be placed in cans of oil. Air-con-
ditioning is a convenience for the workers but is not necessary or even desirable
for mosquito rearing. Mosquito rearing may be done under much more primi-
tive conditions, in a tent, camper, trailer, a passenger car and even on the
trail, but in these cases the techniques and equipment described below must be
modified to the particular situation. However the general technique is the same
in all cases.
A laboratory or a collapsible stereoscopic field microscope is extremely
useful but a good hand lens (10X to 20X) is usually sufficient. The basic equip-
ment and supplies required for rearing and processing are (1) pipettes and med-
icine droppers, (2) aspirators, (3) dip net bags, (4) plastic, enamel or porce-
lain sorting bowls, (5) plastic cups with lids, (6) plastic cup cages, (7) plastic
vials with lids, (8) plastic vial cages, (9) plastic pillboxes, (10) pencils, grease
pencils, label strips, (11) paper towels and tissue, (12) forceps, camel's hair
brushes. All the equipment should be for use exclusively in the laboratory and
should not be taken into the field.
CARE OF COLLECTIONS AND SORTING. Immediately after a field trip
all the collections must be checked carefully. If possible some sorting should
also be done at this time but it may be postponed to a later hour or to the fol- »
lowing day after taking care of emerged adults and the isolation of pupae and at
least a few larvae (particularly if dealing with Psorophora). The grease pen-
cil marks on all containers should be made plain if smudged.
1. Killed adults. The plastic cups and vials with killed adults should be
opened and a drop or two of water added to the paper to keep the specimens
from drying out. The processing of this material should be done within 24
hours of capture using the technique outlined under FIELD COLLECTED
ADULTS in the next chapter.
2. Oviposition vials. The oviposition vials should be opened carefully and
checked. If insufficient moisture is present a drop of water should be added.
If the vial is excessively humid the female should be transferred to a fresh ovi-
position vial by loosening the lid of the old vial, carefully slipping the mouth of
the new vial under this lid and allowing the female to move up into the new vial
which is then capped and marked with the same number in grease pencil on the
side and lid (the old lid may be used after it is dried). Set the vials aside for
further processing as outlined below under PROGENY REARINGS.
3. Emergence and pupation. The plastic cups with immature stages require
the greatest care. If a large number of adults have emerged in a cup, place an
aerial net over it, carefully slip off the lid and let the adults move up into the
inverted net, tapping on the side of the cup to drive them out. Now remove the
net, confine the adults into the upper part of the net and remove them with an
aspirator to a plastic cup cage marked with the collection number in grease
pencil. If only a few adults have emerged they can usually be sucked up with
an aspirator slipped in under the lid and then transferred to one or more plas-
tic vial cages. The pupal skins are handled as indicated under EMERGENCE
VIALS AND CAGES. The vial cages should be provided with a pencilled paper
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
label slipped under the lid. The cup and vial cages are set aside for 1 or 2
days after which the adults are killed and processed as indicated in the next
chapter.
If there is a large number of pupae in any cup they should be transferred
with a pipette to another cup with about 2 cm (about 1 inch) of fresh clean water
and this cup covered with a aaa top and the side marked with the collection
number in grease pencil.
4. Sorting. The sorting of the immature stages and their separation for in-
dividual rearings, mass rearings and preservations can now be carried out.
The sooner this is done the better and this should always be completed within
24 hours of capture. Work with one collection at a time going through the whole
process before turning to the next collection. If more than one plastic cup con-
tains immature stages from the same collection or if pupal and/or larval iso-
lations were made in the field assemble them all together.
Generally, more than one species is found in a single collection of imma-
ture stages even when collections are made from individual breeding sites such
as one crabhole, one treehole or one water-holding plant, but as a rule one spe-
cies is dominant in a particular collection and the others are frequently repre-
sented by few specimens or by younger larval instars, by pupae or by eggs. It
is more important to make fewer collections in which all the species have been
recovered and the different stages of each (larva, pupa and adult, male and fe-
male) correctly associated (through individual rearings) than to make many col-
lections in which these objectives have not been carried out. Therefore the
emphasis below is on thoroughness of sorting and rearing but with indication of
simpler, less time-consuming methods which may have to be followed at times
for one reason or another.
When a collection contains little debris and sediment it is possible to do the
sorting directly from the original plastic cup after the sediment has settled and
as the larvae and pupae come to the surface.
First, all the pupae that were not isolated for rearing in the field are trans-
ferred one to a plastic vial in about 2 cm (Somewhat less than one inch) of fresh
clean water. The plastic vials are marked with the collection number in grease
pencil. These will be later processed as indicated below under pupal rearings
in the section on INDIVIDUAL REARINGS together with any pupae that may —
have been isolated from the same collection in the field. As arule, all the pu-
pae present in a collection should be isolated individually unless the collection
consists primarily of pupae and the total number exceeds 15 in which case see
under MASS REARINGS below for procedure to be followed. If it is obvious
that several species are represented among the pupae or an unusual species is
suspected a larger number should be isolated individually (see pupal rearings
below).
Second, the fourth instar larvae are roughly sorted by eye to species,
picked up one by one and placed into separate plastic cups for each species.
Each cup is marked in grease pencil with the collection number followed by a
dash and then a separate sublot number for each species, sublot 1 for one spe-
cies, sublot 2 for the second species, and so on as necessary to sublot 9 for
the ninth species. When more than 9 species are found in one collection as-
sign another collection number, indicate that it is a continuation of the origi-
nal collection number and use the 9 sublots in this new lot as needed. Use
general appearance, color, size, movement, position in the water, size and
shape of head capsule and antenna, hairiness of body, length and shape of si-
phon as criteria for distinguishing different species from one another. Fre-
quently the pattern of abdominal pigmentation will help distinguish some
%
K
i
Ma
R
i
q
4
i
ee
a i
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 49
species, e.g. fourth abdominal segment unpigmented and contrasting with the
other strongly pigmented segments. Leave the smaller instars in the original
cup unless they can be associated with fourth instar larvae on the basis of the
characters mentioned above.
Third, for each sublot isolate half of the total number of mature larvae, up
to a maximum of 10, in plastic vials for individual rearings. When there is an
uneven number of larvae the total number is treated as if it were the next even
number for the purpose of making isolations, i.e. if only one larva is present
it is used for an individual rearing, if there are 3, two are isolated, if there
are 5, three are isolated and so on. The individual vials are filled with water
from the original collection cup to a height of about 2 cm (somewhat less than
one inch), marked with the collection number (lot) and the sublot number in
grease pencil and set aside to be processed as indicated below under INDIVID-
UAL REARINGS. The remaining larvae in each sublot, normally up to a max-
imum of 20, are set aside for killing and preservation (see next chapter) and
any larvae left over in each sublot are transferred into a clean plastic cup with
about 2 cm (inch or less) of water from the original collection, marked with the
collection number (lot) and sublot in grease pencil and processed as indicated
below under MASS REARINGS. If an unusual species is encountered and the
number of larvae remaining in a sublot is greater than 50 the larvae should be
divided equally for killing and for mass rearing. In case it is not practical to
take care of a large number of mass rearings because of shortage of personnel
or some other reason all the larvae remaining after isolation of individuals
should be killed and preserved; NEVER DISCARD ANY MATERIAL ONCE
COLLECTED.
The unsorted material left in the plastic cup(s) from the original collection,
containing young larvae and marked with the collection number only should be
treated as indicated below under MASS REARINGS. ;
Frequently it will be impossible to sort the larvae and pupae directly from
the plastic cups brought in from the field because of the dark color of the water
or the presence of a great deal of debris or sediment. In such cases the con-
tents are agitated with a pipette and poured through a dip net bag. The original
water is saved and returned to the original cup(s) or to clean plastic cup(s)
plainly marked with the collection number (lot) in grease pencil. If the origi-
nal plastic cup is discarded be sure to wash it off thoroughly to save any eggs
that may be stranded on the sides and pass this water through the dip net bag.
Now the concentrate in the dip net bag is dipped into the sorting pan(s) with
ample quantity of clean fresh water and carefully washed off; if necessary use
a stream from a squeeze bottle or a pipette to dislodge all the material. It
may be necessary to subdivide the material for sorting into additional pans a
little at a time. The procedure outlined above for the separation of pupae, sub-
lots and individual rearings is now followed; only the original water is used for
the larval rearing. When the sorting is completed, the water in the sorting
pans, containing debris and small larvae, is passed through a dip net bag, the
concentrate replaced into the original collection water in one or more plastic
cups and the wash water discarded. Be sure to wash the sorting pans thor-
oughly and to add the concentrate to the plastic cups with the original water be-
fore they are further processed as indicated below under MASS REARINGS.
Great care should be taken to rinse thoroughly sorting pans and pipettes be-
tween processings of different collections to eliminate contamination.
It is sometimes impossible to go through all the steps indicated above for
the sorting of material and to make lot and/or sublot mass rearings (see
50 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst:, vol..1, no. 2, 1965
MASS REARINGS below) in addition to individual rearings. It may be difficult
even to sort the larvae to species. Larval isolations for individual rearings
should always be made but in extreme cases the remainder of the collection
may be killed and preserved as indicated in the next chapter.
WASHING CONTAINERS. All containers used for collecting, sorting and
rearing must be washed thoroughly before they are used again. First, wipe off
the grease pencil markings from the dry containers with a piece of absorbent
cotton. Containers that are reasonably clean, without deposit of salts on the in-
ner walls, may be merely rinsed several times in clean fresh water. Soiled
plastic containers should be washed with water and ordinary soap only, never
with detergents or with scouring or cleansing powders or compounds. Use a
nylon test tube brush to remove stains and deposits. Be sure to wash out very
thoroughly all the rubber bulbs after detaching them from the pipettes. Plastic
vial cages should have the cotton replaced as soon as they show any growth of
molds or become soiled (see GLOSSARY for method). Aspirators should also
be cleaned periodically and the netting replaced on the plug.
ORGANIZATION OF LABORATORY. Even when a small number of collec-
tions is being reared it is important to organize all the material systematically
in the laboratory to eliminate confusion and to save time. Two general methods
are suggested below, the choice between the two depends on the amount of ma-
terial, number of individual rearings and the available personnel.
When the number of collections is relatively small (less than 10) and the to-
tal number of individual rearings at any one time is less than 100, all the con-
tainers pertaining to each collection may be placed together, the general lot
mass rearing, the sublot mass rearings, the individual pupal and larval rear-
ings, the holding vial cages for adults, the collection record forms together
with the label strips and the shell vials containing the larval and pupal skins.
Small shallow boxes or special racks to hold the individual plastic vials and
cages containing the various stages in groups are very useful but not essential.
Under these conditions one shell vial may be used for both the larval and pupal
skin of the same individual rearing. The larval skin is transferred from the
rearing vial together with its label but the cotton plug is placed into the vial
only after the corresponding pupal skin is later added when the larval label is
withdrawn and matched with the pupal label; both labels are then placed above
the cotton plug before final stoppering. It is important to have both labels in
the vial for this provides a check for correct association of skins.
With a large number of collections (10 or over) and with more than a total
of 100 individual rearings being carried out at one time, it is much more ef-
ficient to arrange the containers together in groups as follows: (1) all the mass
rearings but with all sublots pertaining to one collection (lot) assembled in sub-
groups together with the general lot of the same collection, (2) all the individ-
ual vials with larvae, (3) all the individual vials with pupae, (4) all the cages
(vial and cup) containing adults isolated for less than 24 hours, (5) the same
as (4) but held over 24 hours. The collection record forms, with the strips of
individual numbers attached, should be filed all in one place, where all the
records will be made. With this arrangement each of the groups listed above
is attended to one at a time until all the work for a group is completed and the
records and labeling is done as indicated below under MASS REARINGS and
INDIVIDUAL REARINGS. Much time is saved if the larval and pupal skins,
each with its own identifying individual number, are placed in separate shell
vials. The association of the stages is done later when the material is mounted. '
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods St
It is very important to prepare for each collection strips of replicate num-
bers for labeling individual rearings as specified in the section on LABELING
in the chapter on COLLECTION RECORDS. See also this chapter for labeling
of material from sublots.
MASS REARINGS. Three types of mass rearings are distinguished here:
(1) lot mass rearings, the general collection not sorted to species or the young
larvae and eggs from the original collection that remain after the fourth instar
larvae have been removed, (2) sublot mass rearings, the larvae sorted from
the original collection, each presumably containing only one species and (3)
progeny mass rearings. After sorting, a lot rearing with its sublot rearings
are placed in a group in the mass rearing area and the cups covered by placing
an inverted lid on top; it is not necessary or advisable to seal the container in
the ordinary way. Mark on the outside of the cup in grease pencil the level of
the water inside the cup. If marked evaporation takes place, the water lost
should be replaced with distilled water if available, otherwise tap water will do.
Every cup must be examined twice each day. Examine one lot and its sub-
lots at one time. If in the lot mass rearing an additional species is noted which
has not been segregated as a sublot, sort it out, assign it a sublot and mark the
plastic cup with the lot and sublot number in sequence following the last sublot
already assigned in this lot. When the larvae in the new sublot(s) are mature,
isolate some for individual rearings, set aside others for killing and preserva-
tion and retain the remainder for mass rearing (see CARE OF COLLECTIONS
AND SORTING above for details). The lot mass rearings should be retained
for at least 10 days to allow hatching and development of young larvae.
Check every lot and sublot in the collection record forms to determine
whether further pupal or larval isolations are necessary. If the full quota of
15 pupal individual rearings has not been reached or if more rearings are de-
sired in special cases, isolate additional pupae in individual plastic vials, mark
the vials with the lot number in grease pencil and set the vials aside to be pro-
cessed as indicated under pupal rearings in the section on INDIVIDUAL REAR-
INGS below. If the full quota of 10 (more in special cases) larval individual
rearings has not been reached, isolate in individual plastic vials full-grown
fourth instar larvae. Label the vials with the lot and sublot number in grease
pencil and set them aside to be processed as indicated under larval rearings in
the section on INDIVIDUAL REARINGS below.
After the isolations are completed pick off all the pupae in each lot and sub-
lot and place them in plastic vials with clean fresh water, up to 5-10 per vial
(depending on size). If a great number of larvae pupate at once the pupae may
be placed in a plastic cup cage (see GLOSSARY) for emergence, up to 200 per
cup cage. Mark the vials or cups with the lot and sublot number in grease pen-
cil, place them with the group of pupal material to be treated later as indicated
below under EMERGENCE VIALS.
Now fill plastic vials about three-quarters full with 80% ethanol, cover them
with lids, mark them with the lot and sublot number on the side and on the lid
and place a paper label with similar data inside each of the vials. One vial is
prepared for each lot or sublot mass rearing and placed next to each of them
until the mass rearings are completed. In each lot and sublot mass rearing
all the larval skins and dead larvae and pupae should be picked up with a pi-
pette and transferred to a plastic bowl of clean fresh water; this will serve to
wash debris from the specimens. From the bowl transfer all the skins and all
52 Gontaibwument dint Insts) wold, nos 2 1065
firm larvae and pupae to the proper vial with ethanol; discard all other materi- ~
al. After the mass rearings are completed the preserved material will be pro- ©
cessed as indicated in the next chapter (INCOMPLETE REARINGS). 4
In general, it is not necessary to add food to the mass rearings if ample
debris was present in the original collection. However if development is slow
a small amount of finely ground dog biscuit or laboratory chow may be added
from time to time. For anopheline larvae this should be sprinkled lightly on
the surface. For all other larvae except carnivorous forms a slurry should be
made first by adding a little water to the ground food and mixing it thoroughly.
A drop or two of the slurry should be placed with a pipette into the bottom of
the plastic cups.
Carnivorous larvae present a special problem in mass rearings. As soon
as discovered they should be isolated in individual vials or cups and each larva
provided with several small larvae of some readily available species (see sec-
tion on SPECIAL REARINGS below).
INDIVIDUAL REARINGS. Individual rearings are made from either pupae —
(pupal rearings) or larvae (larval rearings) which have been isolated in individ- —
ual plastic vials either in the field or in the laboratory and marked with the col- —
lection (lot) number and the sublot. Each vial must be provided now with an in- —
dividual rearing number which will identify the stages of each individual '
throughout the rearing and processing (see LABELING in the chapter on COL- ©
LECTION RECORDS). 4
Pupal Rearings. Assemble all the vials of pupae marked with a given col-
lection number (lot) and have the collection record form for that collection at
hand. Mark an entire strip of duplicate numbers in the -100 series with the
collection number in front of the dash. Cut off a duplicate set of numbers from
the top of the strip and insert this label on the outside of the vial between the
lip of the vial and the lid. Continue until all the pupal isolations are labeled. 4
On the collection forms place a check mark in front of all the numbers that have —
been assigned and attach with a paperclip the remainder of the label strip to the
collection form. This will be used to mark any additional pupal isolations that
may be made from the mass rearing of that collection. After labeling, all the
pupal rearing vials are placed together and processed further as indicated in
the section on EMERGENCE VIALS below.
Larval Rearings. Assemble all the vials of larvae (or larval skins and as-
sociated pupae) marked with the same lot number and arrange them in groups
according to sublots. Have the collection record form for that collection (lot)
at hand. Mark full strips of triplicate numbers in the -10, -20, -30 series as
needed for each of the sublots by writing in the collection number (lot) in front
of the dash. Working with one sublot at a time cut off a triplicate set of num-
bers from the top of a strip and insert this label on the outside of the vial be-
tween the lip of the vial and the lid. Continue until all the larval isolations are
labeled for a given sublot. On the collection form place a check mark in front
of all the numbers that have been assigned and attach with a paperclip the re-
mainder of the label strip to the collection form. Do the same for all the sub- ©
lots in the same lot and then go on to the other lots and repeat. The label strips ©
attached to the collection form will be used to mark any additional larval isola- ~
tions that may be made in the future from the sublot mass rearings. After la-
beling, all the larval rearing vials are placed together and processed further
as indicated in the section immediately below.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 53
PUPATION VIALS. Vials containing isolated larvae, marked with individ-
ual rearing numbers (see Larval Rearings above), should be examined twice a
day for pupation preferably in late forenoon and late afternoon. Check through
all the vials and set aside all those containing larval skins before further pro-
cessing. Pour the contents of such a vial into a small clean sorting bowl with
fresh clean water. Transfer the pupa with a pipette into a clean plastic vial
containing 2 cm of clean fresh water; cut off two of the triplicate numbers from
the label and insert this label on the outside between the lip of the vial and the
lid. This marked vial is now placed with the emergence vials and processed as
indicated in the section below. Next, rinse out the original isolation vial with
clean water and fill it with about 5 ml of 80% ethanol. Transfer the larval skin
with a pipette into the vial with alcohol and attach the remaining number of the
triplicate set in the usual manner. This marked vial is now set aside to be pro-
cessed as indicated in the section on SKINS in the chapter on KILLING AND
PRESERVATION. This entire process is repeated for all the larval isolations.
All vials containing dead or moribund larvae should be set aside to be
promptly processed after completion of the care of the individual rearings as
indicated in the section on PARTIAL REARINGS in the next chapter. DO NOT
DISCARD THEM OR REMOVE THEIR LABELS.
If only a small number of collections is being processed in the laboratory
(see CARE OF COLLECTIONS AND SORTING above) the larval skins can be
put into individual shell vials filled with 80% ethanol, each with its identifying
label, at this time. For directions see again the section on SKINS in the fol-
lowing chapter.
No food should normally be added to pupation vials except for carnivorous
forms. For these as well as for Mansonia and other larvae requiring special
attention see the section on SPECIAL REARINGS below.
EMERGENCE VIALS AND CAGES. Vials containing isolated pupae, marked
with individual numbers, either from direct field collections or from mass lot
rearings and individual larval rearings should be examined twice a day, pre-
ferably in early morning and late afternoon. Check all the vials and set aside
all those with emerged or drowned adults for processing. To remove the viable
emerged adult loosen the lid and carefully slip in and replace it by the mouth
of an inverted plastic holding vial (see GLOSSARY). Tap on the side of the pu-
pal container to induce the mosquito to enter the holding vial and quickly stop-
per it with the original lid. Cut the duplicate identifying number into 2 strips,
attach one of these under the lid in the usual manner. This vial will now be
processed as indicated below under HOLDING VIALS AND CAGES. Next pour
some 80% ethanol (about equal in volume to the pupal water) into the vial con-
taining the pupal skin and drop in the other label. Put this vial aside to be pro-
cessed as indicated in the section on SKINS in the next chapter. The entire
process is repeated for all the pupal vials.
All vials containing dead or moribund pupae and drowned, partially emerged
or very weak adults stuck to the water film should be set aside and processed
prompty after completion of the care of individual rearings as indicated in the
section on PARTIAL REARINGS in the next chapter. NEVER DISCARD THIS
TYPE OF MATERIAL OR REMOVE LABELS FROM IT.
When plastic cups with screen tops are used for the mass emergence of
adults they should be checked twice a day as in the case of emergence vials.
For each collection all emerged adults are first picked up with an aspirator
inserted through the slit in the top and transferred to a similar cup without
54 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst:, vol. 1, nov 2; 1965
any water. This plastic cup cage is marked with the lot and sublot number as
required and placed with the individual holding vials to be treated as indicated
below. If only a few adults emerge at one time they can be transferred to small
emergence vials similar to those used for individual rearings, up to 5 per vial.
After the adults are removed all the pupal skins and dead pupae in the plastic
cup are transferred with a pipette to a plastic vial filled with 80% ethanol. Ex-
cess water in the pipette should be removed before dropping the mosquitoes in-
to the vial. Mark the vial with the lot and sublot number as required and keep
the vial by the plastic cup with the live pupae until emergence is completed.
The vial will then be processed as indicated in the paragraph on Mass Rearings
in the section on REARED ADULTS in the next chapter.
HOLDING VIALS AND CAGES. Reared adults should be kept for at least
24 hours, preferably for 48 hours, before being killed and processed as indica-
ted in the section on REARED ADULTS inthe next chapter. If they are kept
for 24 hours there will be 2 groups of cages at any one time, one group con-
sisting of those being isolated on a given day, another those isolated on the day
before. If adults are held for 48 hours there will be a third group. Mark each
geroup plainly with the date the adults were isolated.
The individual holding vials require relatively little siete: it is not nec-
essary to feed or to open the cages during the holding period. The vials must
always be tightly stoppered. Check at least once a day through all groups, pro-
cess dead specimens immediately or as soon as possible, following the direc-
tions in the section on REARED ADULTS in the next chapter. After the re-
quired 24- or 48-hour holding period process the specimens in that group fol-
lowing the same directions. |
The plastic cup cages should have a small wad of moistened absorbent cot-
ton resting on top of the netting which is covered loosely with an inverted lid.
Remove all dead adults as soon as noted with an aspirator inserted into the slit
in the netting; the cotton plug must be carefully replaced. Place these adults
into a clean dry plastic vial together with the required label and process this
as soon as possible following directions in the section on REARED ADULTS in
the next chapter.
Plastic vials containing several ndults should be handled the same way as
the plastic cup cages.
PROGENY REARINGS. Female mosquitoes isolated in oviposition vials
(see the chapter on the COLLECTION OF ADULTS and the section on CARE
OF COLLECTIONS AND SORTING above) require considerable attention in the
laboratory. First replace the solid lid with fine nylon netting held on the vial
by another plastic lid whose center has been cut out. Place a very small wad
of cotton moistened (not dripping) with 10% sugar solution on top of the netting
and cover loosely with the original solid plastic lid. The oviposition cages
should be checked daily and the sugar wad renewed if any mold develops or if
it dries out. It is suggested that a blood meal be offered daily to each female
by placing the screened top against the inner part of the forearm or finger. If
there is any danger of disease transmission or if the female does not take hu-
man blood various mammals or birds should be tried as a source of blood by
placing the screened top of the vial on a suitable area of a confined donor. It
is very important to provide a daily blood meal to certain species in order to
obtain oviposition, particularly in the genus Psorophora.
The place of oviposition in nature varies with the different genera (some-
times species within a genus) and it is therefore necessary to provide condi-
tions suitable for the particular species at hand. For Anopheles a few drops
Be a ae
Se en a eae OE
Fe ae ae ef ee ee RE
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods OO
of water should be added through the screen top to maintain a thin film over the
cotton in the bottom of the vial by applying the tip of a medicine dropper to the
netting and forcing the appropriate amount of water through it; avoid drenching
the mosquito. For Culex, Aedeomyia, Uranotaenia, Culiseta, Mansonia, Toxo-
rhynchites and other forms generally laying eggs on the water surface, singly
or in rafts, more water should be added so that it stands about 1 cm above the
level of the cotton. For many Mansonia an additional requirement is a small
disc of wet-strength paper placed on the surface of the water (see SPECIAL
REARINGS). For all other groups, including particularly Aedes, Haemagogus,
Psorophora and related genera, there should be little or no free water on the
cotton on the bottom of the vial so that the strip of paper towel on the inside of
the vial will show a gradient of humidity. Eggs will be laid by these forms pri-
marily on the strip of paper toweling. For other genera, variations of these
methods should be tried to simulate the conditions in the normal oviposition
sites. Paper toweling of varied texture, color and absorbency as well as strips
of wet-strength paper should be tried. It may be necessary to place the ovipo-
sition cage in the dark for some Species or to wrap dark paper completely or
partially around the vial.
Gravid females collected in the field will generally oviposit within 3 to 4
days if they will lay eggs at all. It is usually not necessary and may be even
detrimental to offer blood to gravid females. Females that are blooded in the
field and laboratory will generally take from 5 to 10 days or even longer before
ovipositing and these should be offered a blood meal daily as indicated in the
first paragraph of this section.
The daily routine of care for the oviposition vials should be as follows, pre-
ferably carried out early in the morning: (1) checking and maintaining the pro-
per level of water and moisture in the vial; if moisture condenses on inner
walls remove the solid plastic lid from the screen top; if molds develop on the
cotton or elsewhere change to a new vial, (2) moistening or replacing the sug-
ar wad, (3) offering a blood meal (this may have to be done at night or in the
dark for some species), (4) checking thoroughly for eggs and os processing the
parent female and her clutch of eggs.
If a female dies before laying eggs, examine her carefully sai if it appears
that she may contain fully developed eggs dissect the abdomen. If eggs with
fully formed plump egg shells are found treat the remains of the parent female
and the eggs as indicated in the next paragraphs. All dead nongravid females
should be saved in the original oviposition cages and processed as soon as pos-
sible as indicated in the next chapter under FIELD-COLLECTED ADULTS.
Some gravid females will refuse to lay eggs. In such instances forced ovi-
position should be tried. Cutting off the wings under light anesthesia and allow-
ing the female to recover on moist paper toweling in the oviposition cage may
induce oviposition. Decapitation of the female is a more drastic stimulus but
works well with some species. Simple CO9 anesthesia may also work and
should be tried using a cork ejector of the type described by Bruce-Chwatt
(1964).
Each cage containing a parent female and her eggs should be processed
promptly. Up to this time these cages have carried only the collection number
(lot). Now each female and her progeny is assigned a sublot number within the
original lot, from -1 to -9. Very seldom will there be more than 9 progeny
rearings from a single lot; if this happens, a new lot number is assigned for
the continuation of the original one, making available sublot numbers for 9 ad-
ditional progenies.
56 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
Before anything else, record on the front of the proper collection form in
the SUBLOTS section the assignment of a sublot number by placing a check
mark in front of the number assigned. Next prepare two paper labels showing
the lot and sublot numbers; to one of these add the letter P following the sublot
number, this label will identify the parent female, the other, replicated as
needed, her progeny through the mass rearings. Now, the parent female is re-
moved in the usual way to a clean plastic vial which is capped with a solid lid
under which the identifying label has been inserted. The vial is set aside to be
processed later as indicated in the next chapter in the section on REARED
ADULTS.
The eggs and mass rearings obtained from the ovipositing females are han-
dled in different ways depending on the genus: ;
(1) For Anopheles, a ring of wax paper is placed on the surface of the tap
water in a plastic cup (about three-quarters full), which is marked with the lot
and sublot number. The eggs are transferred as soon as possible to the rear-
ing container by removing the paper strip and cotton from the oviposition cage
and immersing them in the water through the center of the wax ring. Eggs re-
maining on the sides of the oviposition vial are picked up gently with a camel's
hair brush and dipped into the water in the center of the ring. Any eggs
stranded on the walls of the plastic cup or floating on the outside of the wax
ring are transferred with a camel's hair brush to the water surface inside the ~
ring. About 10 eggs from each clutch should be preserved following the instruc- —
tions in the section on EGGS in the following chapter. The mass rearing is |
now set aside. When the first larva hatches (in about 3-5 days) a very small
piece of yeast cake is placed on the inside rim on the wax ring so that it touches :
the water. When all the first instar larvae have hatched the wax ring is re-
moved. Finely ground dry food is sprinkled very sparingly twice a day on the
water surface. For further treatment see the general instructions for mass
rearing, preservation of larvae and isolation of individual rearings below. :
(2) For Culex and other forms whose eggs are laid in masses or individually —
on the water surface, transfer the eggs with a camel's hair brush into a plastic —
cup three-quarters filled with tap water. Label the cup with the lot and sublot
number in grease pencil. When the first larvae appear place a small amount
of food slurry in the bottom of the plastic cup once or twice a day as needed.
(3) For species of Mansonia transfer the egg mass or the disc of wet-
strength paper to which the eggs are attached, to a plastic cup three-quarters
full of tap water. Label the cup and feed the larvae as indicated above. Place
additional discs or strips of wet-strength paper on the water surface as needed
for the attachment of larvae. See the section on SPECIAL REARINGS below
for further processing.
(4) For Aedes, Psorophora, Haemagogus and other forms whose eggs are
laid primarily above the water surface the following procedure should be fol-
lowed: (a) Initial period of conditioning: the oviposition vials should be capped
with solid lids to provide a humid environment for the development of the eggs.
After 3 or 4 days examine 1 or 2 eggs under a microscope or with a hand lens.
If the eggs are still plump they are probably viable and ready for drying. (b)
Period of drying: replace the solid lid with a screen top and allow the eggs to
dry. The period of drying will vary with different species and has to be deter-
mined empirically. Examine 1 or 2 eggs periodically to determine whether
they remain plump (viable) or shrivel (dead); if they shrivel it probably means
that in this particular species the period of drying should be omitted. (c) Pe-
riod of flooding: if the eggs remain plump after drying for 3-5 days, fill the
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods o7
vial with tap water or preferably rainwater and empty all the eggs into a plastic
cup marked with the lot and sublot number. Fill the plastic cup about three-
quarters full of water and add 1 tablet of vitamin C, a drop of food slurry and
avery small piece of yeast cake. If the eggs are viable and properly condi-
tioned hatching should occur within 30 minutes. If they fail to hatch transfer
them to a dry strip of paper toweling placed in the original oviposition vial, cap
the vial with a screen top, allow the eggs to dry for several days and repeat
the flooding one or more times until hatching takes place.
For all progeny rearings a sample of 5-10 eggs should be preserved when-
ever possible before mass rearing is begun. See the section on EGGS in the
next chapter for methods of preservation. Whenever possible a sample of 5-10
specimens of each instar (including the pupa) should be preserved following the
directions in the section on WHOLE LARVAE AND PUPAE in the next chap-
ter. Wait until nearly all the individuals have reached a given instar before
selecting specimens of that instar for preservation to avoid a very uneven sex
ratio in the final rearing (males develop faster).
Set aside all the progeny rearings as a subgroup with the general mass
rearings and treat them as outlined above in the section on MASS REARINGS,
preserving all the cast skins and marking all the material with the appropriate
lot and sublot numbers and processing it as outlined in the next chapter. Be
sure to feed the larvae regularly but not excessively. When all the individuals
in a given progeny rearing are in the fourth instar, isolate 10 specimens in
plastic vials for individual rearings. Assign each specimen an individual rear-
ing number in the usual manner using the label strips with triplicate numbers.
For example, the individual rearings from the progeny mass rearing 52-1 will
be identified as 52-10, 52-11, 52-12 and so on to 52-19; those from progeny
mass rearing 52-2 will be identified as 52-20, 52-21 and so on to 52-29. At-
tach the labels under the vial lid in the usual manner. On the back of the col-
lection form place a check mark in front of all the numbers that have been as-
signed. The individual vials are now placed and processed together with all
the others as indicated in the section on INDIVIDUAL REARINGS above.
Progeny rearings are very time-consuming and require a great deal of at-
tention. Therefore with limited personnel only a few can be carried out at any
one time and some of the steps may have to be eliminated, e.g. individual iso-
lations and preservation of samples of all stages. However, progeny rearings
are extremely important for taxonomic studies and every effort should be
made to carry out the full procedure as outlined above for at least one female
of each species.
EGG REARINGS. Egg rafts or individual eggs collected in the field for
rearing should be processed, in different ways depending on the type of egg,
according to the methods suggested in the section on PROGENY REARINGS
above. Thereafter the rearings should be handled as indicated in the section
on MASS REARINGS except that food must be added regularly. If more than
one species is noted, sublots should be made. When all the fourth instar lar-
vae are nearly mature proceed as indicated in the section on CARE OF COL-
LECTIONS AND SORTING to separate larvae for preservation and for indi-
vidual rearings.
REARINGS FROM DRY MATERIAL. Samples of soil from depressions
or edges of temporary ground pools and debris from treeholes and other con-
tainer habitats (see section on COLLECTING EGGS AND DRY MATERIAL in
the chapter on COLLECTION OF IMMATURE STAGES) often contain mosqui-
to eggs that will hatch upon flooding. Place material from such a collection
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent.. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
in a plastic cup marked with the collection number, fill the cup about three-
quarters full with rainwater or tap water and add a tablet of vitamin C. Some
larvae should hatch within 30 minutes but others may not appear for about a
day. If no hatching at all takes place concentrate the material with a dip net bag
and dry the concentrate on paper toweling in a plastic cup. The process may
have to be repeated more than once to induce hatching in some species.
Once larvae hatch the rearing should be handled as indicated above in the
section on MASS REARINGS and separation of sublots and isolation of individ-
ual rearings as indicated in the section on CARE OF COLLECTIONS AND
SORTING.
SPECIAL REARINGS. Some species require pemal attention and/or meth-
ods in individual and/or mass rearings. Only two specific cases are mentioned
below but if difficulty is encountered with other types of larvae, variations in
rearing techniques should be tried to reproduce conditions analogous to those in
the natural habitat of the species in question.
Immature stages of the genus Mansonia may be reared using the simple
technique described by Laurence, Page and Smith (1962). Discs of wet-
strength paper, 1 cm in diameter, are placed on the water surface of the rear-
ing container, 1 disc to an individual rearing, several for mass rearings. If
this special type of paper is not available, use tough commercial grade paper
towels. The discs may have to be replaced if the larva becomes detached. Pu-
pation takes place on the underside of the disc with the pupa attaching itself
firmly to the paper. To transfer the pupa lift the disc with forceps and place it
on top of the water in the emergence vial.
Carnivorous larvae are usually readily recognized by a large head which is
strongly produced in front of the antennae or by very strongly developed and
projecting maxillae or mandibles. Most carnivorous forms are generally very
sluggish but show sudden jerky movements when alarmed or when attacking
their prey. As soon as noted, carnivorous larvae should be isolated in individ-
ual containers and provided with several small mosquito larvae of some com-
mon species. Development of these larvae will be rapid if the supply of prey
is maintained. At pupation be careful that the correct larval skin and pupa is
preserved for the larval vial may contain several cast larval skins and several
pupae of the prey species.
KILLING AND PRESERVATION
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES. The following equipment and supplies are
needed for killing and preserving mosquitoes: (1) killing tubes, (2) aspirators,
(3) aerial net, (4) ordinary and entomological forceps, (5) large and small plas-
tic pillboxes, (6) paper toweling or cellucotton cut in squares to fit the pill-
boxes, (7) absorbent cotton, (8) gelatin capsules, (9) label strips, (10) 80% —
ethanol, (11) 5% and 10% formalin (2% and 4% formaldehyde respectively), (12)
shell vials with neoprene stoppers, (13) small pipettes and medicine droppers,
(14) sorting bowl, (15) dissecting needle, (16) beaker or pan for hot water.
FIELD-COLLECTED ADULTS. Adult mosquitoes collected in the field are
usually killed immediately upon capture and placed in plastic cups or vials with
paper toweling or tissue paper (see chapter on COLLECTION OF ADULTS) to
be processed in the laboratory. Specimens obtained in incidental collections
(see chapter) have to be processed in the same manner as outlined below, but
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods o9
usually in the field. It is not advisable to make final mounts of adult mosquitoes
on pins or points during a survey because of the time involved and because it is
difficult to take proper care of mounted specimens and to ship them. If, how-
ever, final mounts have to be made, it is suggested that adults be glued with
'"Ambroid’’ cement on the right side, legs facing the pin, on heavy paper ''points"
on #3 insect pins with nylon heads.
The most practical method of handling field-collected adults is to preserve
and store them in pillboxes for shipping and future mounting (for exceptions see
ADULTS IN ALCOHOL). Many different types of pillboxes have been used quite
satisfactorily but it is recommended that for the sake of uniformity plastic pill-
boxes be used. Cellucotton or household paper toweling cut to fit exactly into
the pillbox should be used in preference to absorbent cotton to hold and protect
the mosquitoes within the pillbox. With plastic pillboxes it is usually not nec-
essary to use a mold preventative but if, for some personal reason, one must
be used it is suggested that only 1 or 2 tiny crystals of thymol be anchored with
glue to the bottom of the pillbox. NEVER PLACE LOOSE CRYSTALS OR
FLAKES OF ANY KIND ina pillbox because of the danger of injury to the mos-
quitoes. If difficulty is encountered with specimens being drawn against the
sides of the plastic pillbox, see STATIC ELECTRICITY in the GLOSSARY.
Place a cut sheet of paper toweling in the bottom of the pillbox. Using ento-
mological forceps remove the mosquitoes from the plastic cup or vial to a sheet
of paper before transferring them to the pillbox. Carefully arrange on top of
the paper toweling in the pillbox a single layer of mosquitoes with legs stretched
out and wings folded over the abdomen, the specimens spaced so that they do not
touch each other. Never dump a mass of tangled specimens into a pillbox.
Place another cut sheet of paper toweling on top of the layer of specimens and
arrange another layer of mosquitoes. Repeat the process until all the mosqui-
toes from a collection have been arranged or until the last layer of mosquitoes
comes up to the level of the shoulder of the pillbox. Place another cut sheet
of paper toweling over the last layer of specimens and on top of that a wisp of
of fluffed out absorbent cotton extending to all sides and corners of the pillbox
and projecting very slightly over the top of the pillbox so that when the lid of
the pillbox is put on, the cotton will barely touch it. Place the label, face up,
upon the cotton in the center of the pillbox and close the box with the lid. Un-
der no circumstance should any significant pressure be used in placing the
specimens, the paper toweling or the cotton; this would result in flattening the
specimens. The paper layers and cotton should rest lightly to barely hold the
specimens and prevent them from moving. There is no need to seal the pillbox
with tape in the laboratory but it is essential to do so when the processing is
done in the field where the pillboxes are subjected to rough handling.
Use as many pillboxes as needed for a given collection and label each pill-
box carefully with the collection number. It is not advisable to put more than
one collection (lot) into one pillbox but if this has to be done because of many
small collections, place a label on a sheet of paper toweling over the speci-
mens from one collection and on top of the label, place another sheet of paper
toweling on which specimens of the next collection will be arranged.
Pillboxes must always be stored ina dry, pest-free place. See the next
chapter for further directions.
ADULTS IN ALCOHOL. With some soft-bodied mosquitoes, primarily
dixa-midges, preservation in 80% ethanol is preferable to storage in pillboxes.
After killing in the usual manner, specimens from field collections, mass
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
rearings, or individual rearings are simply dropped one by one, head first, in-
to a shell vial filled with the alcohol. Separate vials are used for each individ-
ual rearing, each sublot and each lot. Do not place more than 10 specimens in
one shell vial. A loose cotton plug is inserted into the vial and pushed down to
just above the level of the specimens. The label is placed above the plug and
the shell vial is capped with the neoprene stopper in the usual way. A record
of the material should be made on the collection form as indicated at the end of
the section on REARED ADULTS.
Poorly hardened, moribund or drowned specimens from mass rearings
should also be preserved in alcohol.
REARED ADULTS. All reared adults after being held for 24 to 48 hours in
plastic vials or cup cages (see HOLDING VIALS AND CAGES in preceding
chapter) should be killed and processed as indicated below. Parent females in
PROGENY REARINGS should be processed immediately after oviposition fol-
lowing the procedure for individual rearings below.
Individual rearings. Process all the adults from individual rearings (marked
with lot number and 2 or 3 digit individual number) that have been held for the
length of time (24 or 48 hour period) together at some convenient time in the af-
ternoon or evening. To speed the process have at hand 2-5 killing tubes to be
used serially. Loosen the lid of a holding vial and holding the vial upside down
slip its mouth over that of a killing tube. The adult will be knocked down by the
chloroform within seconds and will fall into the killing tube. To hasten the
knockdown tap on the vial. Remove the vial and hold a thumb over the mouth of
the killing tube until the specimen ceases struggling. Place the label inside the
killing tube, stopper the tube and set it aside. Proceed in the same manner with
1-4 other adults and place the killing tubes in sequence. After all the tubes are
used return to the first one for the second step in processing as indicated in the
next paragraph. After this step is finished kill another adult with the emptied
tube and place it in sequence after the others. Continue in this manner until all
the adults are processed. Time the processing to allow the adult to remain in
a tube at least 5 minutes but not longer than 10 by using the appropriate number
of killing tubes.
Transfer the adult and its label from the killing tube to a clean white card.
Pick up the adult with entomological forceps by the legs and let it fall head first
into the larger half of a gelatin capsule. If the mosquito fits snuggly, tap the
bottom of the capsule. Fluff out a very small piece of absorbent cotton and
smooth it out on one end. Introduce the smooth end into the gelatin capsule to
keep the mosquito from moving. The cotton must not touch the specimen and
should not project outside the capsule half. Next place the label on the outside
of the capsule half containing the specimen so that one end of the label extends
just beyond the upper margin of the capsule and slip the smaller half of the
gelatin capsule over it and the larger half as far as it will go.
A small plastic pillbox should be used to store the adult if it is too large to
fit into a gelatin capsule or if gelatin capsules cannot be used at all because of 3
excessive humidity. Place a square of paper toweling cut to fit exactly inside d
the pillbox on the bottom of the box and transfer the specimen to it. If difficulty
is encountered with specimens being drawn against the sides of the plastic pill-
box, follow the procedure under STATIC ELECTRICITY in the GLOSSARY.
Next place loosely another square of paper toweling over the mosquito. Fluff 3
out a small piece of absorbent cotton and use it to fill the plastic pillbox very
loosely; this should be a mere puff of cotton fibers. Never stuff the pillbox
SP ae a eed mre ee a eR
TR Se a a ee ae ee Sats
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 61
with a wad of cotton or exert any pressure. Next place the label on top of the
cotton and cover with the pillbox lid. The bottom square of paper toweling may
be left out so that the specimen is visible on the bottom of the pillbox but the
mosquito should always be protected from the cotton by the upper square of
paper.
After all the specimens have been processed a record of them must be made
on the back of the collection forms. Place a check mark in pencil in the appro-
priate column in the line for the corresponding number for either a male (M) or
female (F). If the sex is not readily determined place the check mark on the
line between the two columns. If an adult escapes during processing make ev-
ery effort to recover it. If there is any doubt at all that the specimen recap-
tured is the one that has escaped indicate this under REMARKS. If it is lost
place 0 on the line between M and F.
Shell vials of the same type as used for storage of alcohol preserved mate-
rial or other small shell vials of moderate diameter (up to 12 mm) may be used
instead of gelatin capsules or small pillboxes. Let the mosquito fall into the
bottom of the vial head first, insert a fluffed out piece of absorbent cotton to
just above the legs of the mosquito, place the label on top of the cotton and cap
the vial with the neoprene stopper.
Gelatin capsules are water soluble and great care must be taken not to get
them wet. They must be stored in a dry and pest-free place. See the next
chapter for further directions for the storage and shipment of gelatin capsules,
pillboxes and shell vials.
Mass Rearings. Process at one time all the adults from mass rearings
(marked with lot number or a lot number and a sublot number of 1 digit) that
have been held for the same length of time (24 or 48 hour period). If the speci-
mens are in vials use killing tubes as indicated for individual rearings above.
Be careful with vials containing more than one adult. It may be necessary with
these to release the specimens in a net first and then recover them with an as-
pirator or a killing tube. For specimens in plastic cup cages remove the adults
one or a few at a time with an aspirator inserted through the slit in the screen
top and blow them out gently into killing tubes.
Process all the adults from one lot or one sublot together, making sure that
labels are placed in all the killing tubes. Make additional labels as needed.
After the specimens have been in killing tubes for 5-10 minutes place them in
large pillboxes using the procedure outlined above under FIELD-COLLECTED
ADULTS. If there is only one specimen in a given lot or sublot it may be
placed in a small pillbox using the technique described under Individual Rear-
ings above.
After all the specimens have been processed a record of them must be made
in the section on SUBLOTS on the front of the collection forms. Place a check
mark in the appropriate column in the line corresponding to the sublot number
for either or both male (M) or female (F). If the sex cannot be readily deter-
mined place the check mark on the line between the two columns (as also indi-
cated under Individual Rearings). For collections not subdivided into sublots
use the line for sublot -1. Store and pack the material as suggested in the
next chapter.
WHOLE LARVAE AND PUPAE. It is essential to preserve an adequate
sample of whole larvae of every species from every field collection and from
all progeny rearings (see directions for material to be preserved in the pre-
ceding chapter on CARE OF COLLECTIONS AND SORTING, PROGENY |
REARINGS, EGG REARINGS and REARINGS FROM DRY MATERIAL). It is
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
also desirable to preserve some whole pupae if the material is available and
time permits. To be uSeful for taxonomic purposes, whole larvae and pupae
must be killed and preserved carefully so that the body shape and all structures,
particularly hairs, are retained. Although it is possible to obtain fairly satis-
factory material by killing larvae and pupae directly in the alcohol in which
they will be preserved, this method is not dependable and should be used only
where facilities or time for the technique outlined below are not available.
The larvae and pupae Set aside for killing and preservation in a plastic cup
marked with the lot and sublot number are first transferred with a pipette to a
sorting bowl with fresh clean water as a washing procedure. With a small num-
ber of larvae the following procedure may be followed. If much debris or sedi-
ment is still present, additional serial transfers should be made until it is elim-
inated. Next a beaker or pan of water is heated to about 60C (140 F) and the
larvae are dropped into it one at a time with a minimum of the water from the
sorting bowl. As soon as the larvae float up to the surface they are transferred
with a pipette individually with a minimum of water to a container of 80% ethanol.
After 5 minutes they are again transferred with a pipette in the same manner to
a plastic vial, or a plastic pillbox with 80% ethanol. The size of this container
will depend on the number of larvae; it should be big enough to accommodate all
the larvae in a single layer on the bottom. Prepare a paper label in pencil,
place it inside the container and cap the container tightly. The larvae should be
allowed to harden for at least overnight before transfer to shell vials.
If there are more than 20 immatures to be killed from one collection, chee
should be washed, as above, and then they may be poured onto a small screen
and this screen dipped into the container of hot water until the larvae are killed.
The screen, with the larvae still in it, is then inverted and washed off in the
first container of 80% ethanol from which they are transferred with a pipette
into a plastic pillbox with 80% ethanol for hardening.
After the hardening period (overnight or longer) the ethanol in the container
is pipetted off and replaced with fresh 80% ethanol.. Next the larvae are trans-
ferred with a pipette to a shell vial filled with 80% ethanol. No more than 20
medium-sized larvae (such as C. quinquefasciatus) should be placed in one
Shell vial. If the larvae do not sink down immediately, tap the sides of the
Shell vial with a pencil. Next insert a plug of cotton into the shell vial forcing
it down to a level just above the larvae. The plug should have a smooth bottom
and should fit easily into the vial; never use a tight wad of cotton for a plug. On
top of the plug place the label and bring the level of the alcohol to near the top
of the vial. Put on the neoprene stopper and release the pressure by inserting
a needle between it and the inner wall of the shell vial.
After the material is processed a record should be made on the front of the
collection forms in the section on SUBLOTS. Place a check mark in the L
(whole larvae) and/or P (whole pupae) column on the line corresponding to the
sublot number; if only a lot number is found on the label use the line for sublot
-1. Store and pack the material as suggested in the next chapter.
SKINS. The most valuable material for taxonomic purposes are the asso-
ciated larval and pupal skins from individual rearings and the corresponding
adults. The greatest care must be taken in processing these. When many mass
or progeny rearings are carried on at one time no attempt should be made to
preserve the corresponding larval and pupal skins in one vial. However with
only a few rearings, the skins may be associated in one vial as indicated in the
section on PUPATION VIALS in the preceding chapter.
Po GOT Rig eR SO IRL OS
Belkin et at: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 63
The larval skins and the pupal skins in individual plastic vials containing di-
lute alcohol that have been set aside for preservation (section on PUPATION
VIALS and EMERGENCE VIALS AND CAGES in the preceding chapter) must
be processed the same day, preferably immediately after completion of the
work on individual rearings. Empty the contents of a vial into a plastic pillbox
with 80% ethanol resting on a white surface; put the label into the pillbox also.
With a pipette transfer the skin into a shell vial filled with 80% ethanol. If the
skin does not sink, place a finger on the mouth of the shell vial and invert the
shell vial several times until the skin is wet and sinks. Next insert a light plug
of cotton as indicated in the section on WHOLE LARVAE AND PUPAE above.
Make certain that the skin(s) does not become entangled in the cotton or trapped
between it and the walls of the shell vial. Place the label, insert the stopper
and release the pressure as indicated in the section on WHOLE LARVAE AND
PUPAE. Skins may also be transferred with a smooth-surfaced lifter but this
takes great care and is not recommended for general use by inexperienced as-
sistants.
After all the skins are processed a record should be made by a check mark
on the back of the collection forms in the 1 (larval skins) or p (pupal skins) col-
umn on the line corresponding to the individual rearing number. Store and
pack the vials as suggested in the next chapter.
INCOMPLETE REARINGS. All specimens that die during rearing in the
laboratory whether in lot mass rearings, sublot mass rearings, or individual
rearings should be preserved as carefully as all the other material. Also all
skins from mass rearings (lot and sublot) should be preserved.
After the completion of lot and sublot mass rearings, process the plastic
vials containing the skins and dead larvae and pupae in alcohol. Empty a vial
into a. sorting bowl (or smaller container) with fresh 80% ethanol. Transfer
the skins (larval and pupal) into one shell vial filled with 80% ethanol and the
whole larvae and pupae into another, following the procedure suggested above
in the sections on WHOLE LARVAE AND PUPAE andon SKINS. Be sure to
label everything and not to place more than a total of 20 specimens in any one
vial. Record the material on the collection forms as indicated in the section
on WHOLE LARVAE AND PUPAE.
_All the material from incomplete individual rearings should be preserved
in separate individual shell vials with 80% ethanol. A dead larva may be
transferred directly into a shell vial but a moribund one should be killed in hot
water following the procedure outlined on the section on WHOLE LARVAE AND
PUPAE and then transferred to a shell vial after one passage through 80% etha-
nol without the hardening procedure.
EGGS. Samples of eggs should always be preserved from PROGENY
-REARINGS, EGG REARINGS and whenever possible from REARINGS FROM
DRY MATERIAL (see preceding chapter). A sample of 5-10 eggs is usually
sufficient but more should be preserved if the clutch is larger or if many eggs
are collected in the field. The eggs of mosquitoes are still poorly known pri-
marily because of failure to collect and preserve them for study.. They show
many valuable taxonomic characters and an effort should be made to collect
and preserve them routinely.
Ten percent formalin (4% formaldehyde) should be used for killing and pre-
serving eggs of the majority of species but 5% formalin may be advisable for
the more delicate eggs of such forms as anophelines. Small shell vials with
neoprene stoppers should be used for containers.
64 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
Egg rafts and hard-shelled aedine eggs are dropped directly into a shell vial
filled with formalin. Use a moistened camel's hair brush to transfer the eggs
from the water, paper toweling, cotton or other surface on which they are laid.
In case of species of Mansonia which attach their eggs to various objects, all or
part of this material around the eggs should be preserved. After the eggs have
settled in the bottom of the shell vial insert a cotton plug (as with whole larvae
and pupae) to just above the level of the eggs and place a label above the plug.
Cap the vial and release the internal pressure in the vial with a needle inserted
between the stopper and the inner wall of the vial.
Very delicate eggs with floats or processes (as in anophelines) should be
killed and preserved by formalin fumes. First place the label facing to the out-
side against the side wall in the bottom of the shell vial and pack tightly some
absorbent cotton in back of the label to a height of about 1 cm (about half an
inch). Saturate the cotton with 5% formalin so that a very thin film remains on
the surface. Next prepare a strip of filter paper or paper toweling narrow
enough to slip into the shell vial and about 5 cm (2 inches) in length. Moisten
this strip with 5% formalin and transfer very carefully with a moistened camel's
hair brush one egg at a time to the middle part of the strip. Next fold over one
end of the strip (without eggs) two or three times, the length of the folded part
being less than the diameter of the shell vial, and slip the strip with the folded
end first into the shell vial. Press the folded end against the cotton in the bot-
tom and push the strip against the inner wall of the vial where moisture will
hold it in place. Next cap the vial with the neoprene stopper in the usual way.
DO NOT FILL THE VIAL with the formalin; the eggs will be killed and pre-
served by the fumes in the vial and bas favmalin on the strip picked up by capil-
larity from the cotton.
After the eggs have been thus eae a record should be made on the
front of the collection forms in the section on SUBLOTS. Place a check mark
in the E (eggs) column on the line corresponding to the sublot number; if only a
lot number has been given use the line for sublot -1. Store and pack the mate-
rial as suggested in the next chapter.
STORING, PACKING AND SHIPPING
STORING. All preserved adults and all supplies used for the preservation
of adults must be stored in a dry pest-proof box or cabinet to protect them
from molds, ants and particularly psocids. A simple wood cabinet with venti-
lation holes on top, an electric light bulb of low wattage (7.5 or 15 watts) asa
drying source in the bottom and legs set in cans of oil serves very well. The
temperature in the cabinet should be maintained as low as possible and should
not exceed 40C (104 F). If psocids are noted, ''Dri-Die"’ or naphthalene flakes
should be applied liberally in the cabinet. A small open cardboard container
with thymol crystals should also be placed in the cabinet. Do not use insecti-
cides suchas DDT, BHC. Ifa drying cabinet is not available, plastic bags
with silica gel should be used to store the material.
Gelatin capsules containing adults should be replaced in the original 100-
capacity cardboard boxes. A few wisps of fluffed out cotton should be placed
to keep the capsules from moving after the box is filled; do not use any undue
pressure or the capsules will be crushed. The empty capsules should also be
stored in the drying cabinet. The plastic pillboxes containing adults should
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 65
also be stored and packed in cardboard containers of a convenient size. Any
Space remaining in the container should be filled loosely with fluffed out cotton
or crumpled paper to prevent movement of the pillboxes. The empty pillboxes
should be kept closed and stored in the drying cabinet. The roll of household
paper toweling and the squares of cut paper toweling to fit into the pillboxes
should also be stored in the cabinet as well as the nylon netting.
The shell vials containing specimens, as well as other vials with ethanol,
should be kept in a cool place, never in the drying cabinet. The shell vials
should be packed neatly in cardboard containers of a convenient size or wrapped
together in paper toweling in bundles of 20 to 50. Plastic vials containing al-
cohol should have the tops sealed with tape to prevent evaporation and be packed
in small cardboard boxes.
PACKING AND SHIPPING. Material should be shipped as soon as possible
for final processing and mounting. Do not let large quantities accumulate but
send it in small parcels. Be sure to include the collection forms with the pre-
served Specimens and indicate the letter code.
It is very important to pack the material very carefully or it may be com-
pletely ruined. Use the special shipping container consisting of a sturdy cor-
rugated cardboard box lined with styrofoam sheets. All the material to be
shipped must first be carefully packed in small cardboard boxes as indicated in
the section above. Check every box for loose containers and fill in the unused
space with cotton or crumpled paper so that nothing will move when the box is
shaken but do not pack tightly. Next seal the individual boxes with tape. Place
all the boxes in the shipping container and fill all the spaces between them
tightly with crumpled paper so that nothing moves and the container is com-
pletely filled. Enough packing material should be placed on top of the boxes so
that when the styrofoam lid is put on a slight pressure will be needed to keep it
down level with the styrofoam sides. Now close the shipping container and seal
the top with tape. The container should then be covered with wrapping paper.
If pinned specimens in Schmitt or other boxes are shipped, a corrugated
board container lined with 2 inches of polyurethane foam should be used.
Make certain that all the pins are in tightly in the box. Empty all the fumiga-
tion crystals or flakes from the box. If large ''points’’ have been used in mount-
ing specimens a pin on each side of every point should be used to prevent the
point from Swinging in transit.
If special shipping containers are not available use a sturdy corrugated board
container with about 2 inches of tightly packed crumpled paper, excelsior or
other packing material on all sides of the material which must first be packed
inside a sealed smaller box. Never use a flimsy container and always fill with
enough packing material so that the container will not be crushed.
All packages should be shipped by air, preferably by AIR PARCEL POST.
If several are shipped at once it may be cheaper to use AIR FREIGHT but this
may require special clearance by Customs and other government agencies and
may actually cost more. All packages should be plainly marked ''Preserved
material for scientific study, no commercial value."
OUTLINE OF PROCEDURES
The following is an outline of the procedures set forth in the preceding
pages of this paper for the handling of the mosquito material from the time of
66 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst:,,vol.. 1,.m0-. 2,-1969
its collection to the step of killing and preservation but does not include the de-
tails of killing and preservation. The purpose is to give an overall perspective
of the procedures rather than to serve as the actual guide itself. Items in
[square brackets] are optional but should be followed whenever possible.
Adults Collected
Killed upon capture:
Killing tube (field)
Place in plastic cup or vial with tissue paper (field)
Preserve in pillbox (most mosquitoes) (lab)
Preserve in alcohol (soft-bodied mosquitoes, gravid females not to be held
for oviposition) (lab)
Females to be retained for progeny rearings:
Place in oviposition vial (field)
Transfer to oviposition cage (lab)
Gravid females; sugar solution
Non gravid females; sugar solution, daily blood meal
Progeny rearings
5-10 eggs preserved, formalin solution or fumes
Transfer remaining eggs to proper type hatching vial
Follow by cycles of drying and flooding, if necessary
Mass rearings in cup; daily feedings ground biscuit, chow or slurry
Preserve skins and 5-10 whole specimens of each instar
Preserve adults in pillbox
[Isolate 10 4th-instars for individual rearings
Preserve associated skins of each individual rearing
Preserve adults in gelatin capsules or pillboxes |
Pupae Collected
Not sorted to species:
Isolate up to 15 into vials for individual rearings (preferably in field)
50 additional for mass rearing
Preserve skins, dead pupae and inviable adults in alcohol
Preserve adults in pillboxes
Preserve remaining pupae
[Sorted to species:
Isolate one half up to 10 of each species into vials for individual rearings
Preserve adults in gelatin capsules or pillboxes
Mass rear one half and preserve one half of remainder (in alcohol)
Preserve adults in pillboxes|
Larvae Collected
Sort to species, each in a separate cup (in field if possible; complete in labora-
tory)
Assign sublots, treat each as follows:
Isolate 4th-instars into separate vials as individual rearings one half of to-
tal up to 10 (in field if possible, remainder in lab)
Rear to adult
Preserve all skins and inviable immatures and adults in alcohol
Preserve adults in gelatin capsules or pillboxes
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 67
Preserve 20 additional 4th-instars in alcohol
Mass rear remaining 4th-instars in cup(s)
Follow special procedure for carnivorous forms
[Preserve up to 10 whole pupae in alcohol]
Rear remainder to-adult; preserve all skins
Preserve adults in pillboxes
Young larvae that cannot be sorted
Mass rear noncarnivorous forms in original container to 4th-instar; then
treat as above
Rear suspected carnivorous forms in separate container(s)
Eggs Collected
Collected and transferred to field egg vial (field)
Transfer to proper type of hatching vial (lab).
Collected in and together with dry material (field)
Transfer to cup, flood, add vitamin C tablet (lab)
Follow with several cycles of drying and flooding (lab)
Rear larvae through adult stage following procedure under "Larvae Collected"
GLOSSARY
Some of the common equipment and supplies used in mosquito surveys and
rearings are listed below in alphabetical order together with explanations of
some special terms or problems mentioned in this publication. The list is not
meant to be exhaustive. Much useful information on equipment, methods of
collecting and rearing and mosquito habitats will be found in other publications
such as Belkin (1962: 67-82), Carpenter and LaCasse (1955: 3-5), Forattini
(1962: 185-302, 593-642), Horsfall (1955), Howard, Dyar and Knab (1913: 106-
185), King et al (1960: 11-17, 23-28), Matheson (1944: 80-86), Russell et al
(1963: 283-361) and Trembley (1955) as well as in the specific references men-
tioned in the preceding text. It should be emphasized that existing methods
should be adapted to local conditions and that new techniques should be tried.
The mention of certain products, manufacturers and distributors in the glos-
sary is not to be construed as endorsements of specific items; similar, equally
satisfactory items may be available elsewhere.
AERIAL NET. Any kind of aerial net may be used but the bag should al-
ways be made of fine-meshed nylon marquisette (see NYLON NETTING). Very
convenient is a Small collapsible net with a short hollow aluminum handle into
which a cane or stick may be inserted when needed.
ALTIMETER. Very convenient for field use is the compensating pocket al-
timeter manufactured by Lufft Instruments, distributed by Watrous & Co.,
Inc., 110 East 23rd St., N.Y., N.Y. 10010. The model with the meter scale
is preferred.
AMBROID. This commercial liquid cement, manufactured by Ambroid Co.,
Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, is an excellent adhesive for attaching adult mos-
quitoes to paper points. The acetone solvent should be evaporated and replaced
by amyl acetate before use.
AQUATIC NET. Various kinds of aquatic nets with circular, triangular or
square frames may be used but the bag should always be of fine nylon marqui-
sette (see NYLON NETTING).
68 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
ASPIRATOR (SUCTION TUBE). Convenient and practical aspirators can be
made from 12.5 mm O.D. extruded acrylic plastic about 30 cm in length, pro-
vided with a hollow plug of 9 mm O.D. rubber or plastic tubing covered with a
small piece of fine nylon netting (see) and a 60 cm length of 12.5 mm O.D. or-
dinary rubber tubing. If it is desired to taper the end of the aspirator the plas-
tic tubing is heated over an electric hot plate (not an open flame), pulled out to
the proper diameter and cut with a fine hacksaw blade.
BATTERY PIPETTE. Commercial battery hydrometers make excellent pi-
pettes for collecting in axils, flower bracts and small treeholes. Discard the
hydrometer element and cut off the external flange and the inner knobs on the
rubber stopper. The hard rubber tubing should be substituted by a length of
plastic tubing (extruded acrylic tubing 9 mm O.D.) that has been tapered as in-
dicated under ASPIRATOR. The plastic tubing should be inserted through the
rubber stopper so that its inner end is flush with the inner end of the rubber
stopper inside the pipette.
CAGES (PLASTIC CUP CAGE, OVIPOSITION VIAL, PLASTIC VIAL CAGE).
Any kind of container, plastic, glass or paper may be converted to a cage by at-
taching a screen top. We recommend the use of plastic vials for small cages
and plastic cups for large cages.
CELLUCOTTON. Any kind of absorbent cotton processed into light weight
sheets with smooth outer surfaces (not hard) may be used for protecting and
preserving mosquitoes in pillboxes. If entomological cellucotton is not avail-
able surgical wadding or dental sponges serve the purpose very well. Small
sheets of cellucotton should be cut very accurately to fit exactly inside the pill-
box so that specimens cannot move into the adjoining layers. All cellucotton
must be stored in a dry place free from molds, preferably in a plastic bag with
Silica gel.
COLLECTING BAG, EQUIPPED. A sturdy canvas field bag (surplus US
Army or Marine Corps musette bag is very convenient) fully equipped with the
following should always be carried on collecting trips: supply of collection
forms, field book, maps, altimeter, thermometer, hand lens, pencils, grease
pencils, label strips, paper towels and tissue, small scissors, forceps, cam-
el's hair brushes, scalpel, pocket knife, machete, trowel, flashlight (torch),
and a pair of light weight rubber or plastic boots.
COLLECTING CONTAINERS. A variety of containers, plastic, glass and
cardboard have been used successfully for storage, transport and rearing of
immature stages. Elaborate containers with vented stoppers (Russell et al
1963: 290) are not necessary. We recommend the use of PLASTIC CUPS (see)
which are light weight, inexpensive and can be stacked when empty. See also
PLASTIC SORTING CONTAINERS.
COLLECTION NUMBER (LOT). Number assigned to every collection and
identifying all specimens from that collection; subdivided into sublots for dif-
ferent species (or individual females for progeny rearings) and individual iden-
tifying numbers for individual rearings.
COTTON (COTTON WOOL). The best grade of sterile absorbent cotton
should be used. If tightly rolled, the cotton should always be fluffed out before
use in shell vials, gelatin capsules or pillboxes. Cotton balls packed in plas-
tic bags are convenient but still are too tight to use directly.
DIP NET AND BAG. A standard dip net frame, an aquarium net frame or
a simple homemade wire frame of a diameter of about 15 cm (6 inches) may be
used. The bag should be made of fine nylon netting (see) or bolting silk (No. 0)
attached to a double muslin band. The depth of the bag should not exceed 10 cm
and should be rounded not pointed.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 69
DIPPER. Any standard mosquito dipper with a hollow handle to accommo-
date a stick or cane may be used. A white interior in the cup is helpful but not
essential (nor is a long handle). A very practical dipper is an aluminum or
stainless steel ladle of 8 oz (240 ml) capacity. Small pans of various kinds,
bowls, cups and even spoons are also useful as dippers in some situations.
EMERGENCE VIAL. Plastic vial of 5 dram capacity containing pupa(e) for
the emergence of the adult(s) of small to medium-sized species. For large
species a 9 dram vial should be used. Keep stoppered with a solid polyethylene
cap at all times.
ENTOMOLOGICAL FORCEPS. Featherweight spatulate-tip entomological
forceps (similar to Ward's C310 or Turtox 110A435) should be used to transfer
adult mosquitoes for storage and preservation. The adults should be grasped
by the legs with the forceps.
GELATIN CAPSULE. Gelatin capsules make excellent containers for tem-
porary storage of adult mosquitoes from individual rearings. Care must be
taken, however, that the filled as well as the empty capsules never become wet
and that they are stored in a dry and fairly cool place free from fungi and pests.
Empty capsules are easily obtained in boxes of 100 from pharmaceutical dis-
tributors or drugstores throughout the world. Parke, Davis & Co. capsules
no. 1 will accommodate most mosquitoes but it may be desirable to have at
hand other sizes, from 000 (largest) to 5 (smallest). Under very humid condi-
tions gelatin capsules may not be practical and should be substituted by small
pillboxes.
GREASE PENCIL (CHINA AND GLASS, WAX). Glass and plastic marking
pencil, the markings easily wiped off with cotton.
HOLDING VIAL. To make a holding vial for adults being hardened for a
24- or 48-hour period saturate a piece of absorbent cotton in fresh clean water
and pack it very tightly in the bottom of a 5 dram plastic vial to a height of
about 12 mm (1/2 in). For large species a 9 dram vial should be used. Keep
stoppered with a solid polyethylene cap at all times. If any difficulty develops
owing to moisture condensation in the vials substitute a fine-meshed nylon net-
ting top for the solid cap.
INDIVIDUAL REARING. Individual reared in isolation so that the adult is
associated with its pupal (pupal rearing) or its larval and pupal skins (larval
rearing).
JERRY CAN. See PLASTIC WATER CAN.
KILLING TUBE, JAR. Chloroform is the preferred killing agent for adult
mosquitoes but ethyl acetate may be used; cyanide is not recommended for
general use. Killing tubes should be prepared with glass test tubes 25 mm x
200 mm (never plastic). A plug of sponge rubber or rubber bands cut into
pieces are placed in the bottom of a test tube to a height of 20-25 mm (one inch
or less). The rubber is saturated with chloroform and covered with a piece of
crumpled ordinary paper (not absorbent) to a height of about 12-15 mm (about
1/2 inch) and topped with a circle of heavy white blotting paper. The tube is
recharged before every trip by pouring in chloroform until the rubber swells.
All excess chloroform and moisture must be wipped off thoroughly inside the
tube. Two or 3 long strips of fine tissue paper should always be kept inside
the tube to provide a grasping surface for dying mosquitoes. The strips should
be replaced as soon as any evidence of moisture appears. The tube must be
kept tightly stoppered with an ordinary cork. To reduce breakage of tubes wind
adhesive tape around the outside of the bottom andrim. For ethyl acetate
70 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
tubes a layer of plaster of Paris is used in place of the rubber and crumpled
and blotting paper. A killing jar is prepared by placing a ball of cotton satura-
ted with chloroform or ethyl acetate in a sturdy wide-mouth glass jar, the top
of the net containing the mosquitoes is introduced into the jar (not touching the
cotton) and a solid screw top placed over it for a few minutes. It is not neces-
sary to make a permanent killing jar for mosquitoes.
LACTOPHENOL. A mixture of 1 part phenol (absolute carbolic acid), 1 part
absolute lactic acid, 2 parts glycerine and 1 part water has been widely used
for killing and preserving whole larvae and pupae and preserving skins (Hop-
kins and Mattingly 1952: 30-31). Because of the difficulty of dehydrating mate-
rial preserved in this viscous fluid satisfactory permanent mounts in euparal
or balsam are seldom possible. Therefore the routine use of lactophenol is
not recommended.
LARVAL FOOD. Individual and mass rearings of older instars collected
in the field do not require food in addition to that brought in with the original
water and concentrate. However, for mass progeny rearings and mass rear-
ings of younger instars collected in the field it is essential to adda small
amount of food regularly, preferably a very small amount twice a day. Finely
ground laboratory chow, dog biscuit or similar dry animal food may be used.
For surface feeders this is sprinkled on the water surface; for bottom feeders
a slurry of food and water is first made and then placed in the container. Small
amounts of yeast cake may also be used as specified in the text. We have found
either dry or live pollen from various flowers and grasses effective food for
hard-to-rear breeders in temporary pools and plant containers.
LARVAL REARING. See INDIVIDUAL REARING.
LIFTER. Various dental tools (probes, spatulas, etc.) may be used for
transferring skins and whole larvae and pupae. The instruments should be
perfectly smooth or damage to the specimens will occur. The use of lifters is
not recommended for inexperienced personnel in the field; a medicine dropper
or small pipette is safer.
LOT. Number assigned to a whole collection; see COLLECTION NUMBER.
MASS REARING. A general rearing without isolation of individuals. Three
types are recognized, (1) lot mass rearing, rearing of a whole collection with-
out separation into species, (2) sublot mass rearing, rearing of an individual
species identified by a sublot number and (3) progeny mass rearing, rearing of
the offspring of an individual female also identified by a sublot number.
MICROVIAL (PERFUME VIAL). Small glass vials, 7.5 mm x 50 mm O.D.,
1 ml capacity (1/4 dram), provided with polyethylene stopper, commercially
used as perfume sample vials, make excellent containers for the storage of
small specimens. Because of the small capacity and narrow neck diameter
some difficulty may be encountered with the larger larval and pupal skins.
Therefore they are not recommended for routine use in the preservation of
skins; use instead the larger SHELL VIALS (see). The microvials of the type
described can be obtained from the Acme Vial and Glass Co., 4909 San Fer-
nando Road West, Los Angeles, California 90039 (Acme long style patent lip
vial, 1/4 dram, with AG 187 polyethylene stopper).
MOSQUITO PUMP. Homemade pumps are extremely useful for the collec-
tion of immature stages from crabholes, large treeholes and other confined
habitats containing a considerable quantity of water. We have found the fol-
lowing two types, small and large, to be quite satisfactory. A rubber bulb, of
the one-way, pressure or suction type (double acting), about 90 ml (3 0z) ca-
pacity, is satisfactory for either type of pump. Small type: The pump chamber
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods qd
or reservoir is a rectangular milk bottle of 2 liter (2 quart) capacity. The rub-
ber bulb is attached by a short length of plastic tubing to a 9 mm (3/8 in) copper
tube fitting inserted with a sleeve of rubber tubing into a suitable hole bored in-
to the milk bottle. A 1-2 meter (3-6 ft) length of rubber tube of either 12 or
25 mm (1/4 or 1/2 in) diameter is fitted onto a piece of aluminum tubing pro-
jecting through a rubber stopper which fits the mouth of the milk bottle. Large
type: The reservoir is a plastic water can (Jerry can) of 9.5 liter (2.5 gals)
capacity with a separate vent hole. The rubber bulb is attached to the vent hole
of the water can through an identical copper tube fitting as above but without the
rubber sleeve. The length of rubber tubing is fitted in the Same manner as
above to the pouring mouth of the water can. Either pump is operated by re-
peated rapid squeezing of the rubber bulb. Care must be taken not to overfill
the reservoir or to get sand and debris into the rubber bulb. Smaller mosquito
pumps, using mouth suction instead of a rubber bulb, may be useful for collec-
ting in leaf axils.
NETS. See AERIAL, AQUATIC and DIP NET.
NYLON NETTING. Nylon marquisette is the preferred material for all net-
ting (aerial and aquatic) and all screen tops. For nets a fine mesh (17 to mm,
42 to in) should be used; for screens on oviposition vials, plastic cup cages and
so on, a coarser mesh (10 to mm, 25 to in) should be used to allow mosquitoes
to feed through the screen.
OVIPOSITION VIAL, CAGE. To make an oviposition vial, saturate a piece
of absorbent cotton in fresh clean water and pack it very tightly in the bottom
of a 9 dram plastic vial to a height of about 12 mm (1/2 in). Cut a strip of pa-
per toweling or filter paper about 2 cm (3/4 in) wide and 6.2 cm (2 1/2 in) long
and fold 1.2 cm (1/2 in) at one end of strip. Insert the strip into the vial with
the folded end resting on the wet cotton and the main part against the wall. Wet
the strip with a drop of clean fresh water so that it clings against the wall. Re-
move all moisture from the inner walls of the vial with paper toweling and cap
the vial with a solid polyethylene lid. Later, in the laboratory, the oviposition
vial will be converted into a PLASTIC VIAL CAGE (see) by the addition of a
netting top; the solid cap will be placed loosely over the netting top and the wad
- of cotton saturated with sugar solution.
PAPER TOWELING. For the storage and preservation of mosquitoes in
pillboxes only soft light household paper towels in rolls (Scottowels or similar
product) should be used. Cut the squares carefully to fit exactly into the pill-
boxes to prevent specimens from moving from the original layer. The paper
toweling should be kept in a dry, fungus- and pest-free place. Coarse, tougher
commercial grade paper hand towels should be used for oviposition strips and
may be satisfactory for attachment discs for the immature stages of Mansonia.
PILLBOXES. Many different types of cardboard, plastic and metal pill-
boxes have been used for the storage and preservation of adult mosquitoes.
Very satisfactory, uniform, inexpensive and readily available are small, clear,
polystyrene boxes used for commercial packaging of small items. We have
found 2 square boxes manufactured by Bradley Industries, Inc., 1650-58 N.
Damen Ave., Chicago, Illinois 60647, to be very useful, Box no. 1 (3/4x3/4x
5/8 in) for individually reared adults and Box no. 3 (1 11/16x1 11/16x9/16 in)
for mass-reared adults. See POLYSTYRENE PLASTIC for precautions to be
observed with various solvents.
PIPETTE, MEDICINE DROPPER. A variety of pipettes have been used for:
the collection and transfer of immature stages. For the field we recommend
72 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
pipettes with a rubber bulb of 30 ml (1 oz) capacity and a 15 cm (6 in) length of
9 mm (3/8 in) extruded acrylic plastic tube. The end of the tube is tapered as
indicated under Aspirator (see). Smaller pipettes can be made from 6 mm
(1/4 in) glass tubing and a 10 ml rubber bulb. Very useful are polyethylene
dropping pipettes whose tip can be cut to the right taper with scissors. Ordi-
nary medicine droppers with the tip of the glass tube cut and fire polished to
widen the diameter of the opening are recommended for the transfer of skins
and whole larvae and pupae. See also BATTERY PIPETTE.
PLASTIC BAG. Plastic food bags (12 x 24 in) make convenient containers
to store samples of soil and debris containing eggs.
PLASTIC CUP. The most practical containers for collection and mass
rearings of immature stages have proved to be opaque white polystyrene cups
with polyethylene caps used commercially for food packaging and as household
refrigerator containers. They are inexpensive (cheaper than wax-lined paper
containers), versatile, take up little space (stacking) and stand up well in the
field. The 15 oz (450 ml), medium impact cup (HP 1215 MB) with polyethylene
lid (HP 200), manufactured by Highland Printers & Plastic Molders, 1434 West
Colorado Blvd., Pasadena, California 91105, has proved to be very satisfac-
tory after several years of field and laboratory use. See POLYSTYRENE
PLASTIC for precautions to be observed with various solvents. An ordinary
pint cylindrical ice cream container fits into the flanged inner top of this plas-
tic cup and can be used as an emergence cage by removing its bottom and.
screening its lid.
PLASTIC CUP CAGE. To make a plastic cup cage cut out the central part
of the solid polyethylene cap and use the remaining rim to anchor a piece of
nylon netting (see) over the cup. Make 2 slits at right angles to each other in
the center of the netting wide enough to allow passage of an aspirator; stopper
the opening with a solid plug of cotton. See POLYSTYRENE PLASTIC for pre-
cautions to be observed with various solvents.
PLASTIC PILLBOX. See PILLBOXES.
PLASTIC SORTING CONTAINERS. Various plastic containers (basins,
bowls, buckets, pans) made of polyethylene or polypropylene are very useful
for sorting and processing collections in the field or laboratory.
PLASTIC VIA]. Small, clear polystyrene vials with polyethylene caps are
recommended as containers for individual rearings and with modification of the
lid, as oviposition vials. The 5 dram (18.5 ml) and 9 dram (33.3 ml) vials,
manufactured by Thornton Plastic Co., 745 Pacific Ave., Salt Lake City, Utah
84104, are very satisfactory. See POLYSTYRENE PLASTIC for precautions
to be observed with various solvents.
PLASTIC VIAL CAGE. To make a plastic vial cage cut out the central
part of the solid polyethylene cap and use the remaining rim to anchor a piece
of NYLON NETTING (see) over the vial. See POLYSTYRENE PLASTIC for
precautions to be observed with various solvents.
PLASTIC WATER CAN (JERRY CAN). A 20 liter (5 gallon) plastic con-
tainer (polypropylene), designed for water storage, should always be carried
on field trips filled with clean fresh water for washing container breeding sites
and for sorting. It can be refilled in the field from springs or streams by fil-
tering water through a dip net bag placed over the spout.
POLYSTYRENE PLASTIC. Paradichlorobenzene, chloroform, ethyl ace-
tate and numerous organic solvents readily dissolve polystyrene and should
never come in direct contact with plastic cups, plastic vials or plastic pill-
boxes.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 73
POLYURETHANE. Soft spongy plastic upholstering material sold in sheets,
recommended as packing insulation material for shipment of boxes of mounted
adult mosquitoes. |
PROCAINE CARTRIDGE. See SHELL VIAL.
PROGENY REARING (SERIES). Rearing from egg clutch laid by an individ-
ual female as a sublot mass rearing.
PUPAL REARING. See INDIVIDUAL REARING.
PUPATION VIAL. Plastic vial of 5 dram capacity containing an isolated
larva being held for pupation. For large species use a 9 dram vial. Keep
stoppered with a solid polyethylene cap at all times.
RACKS. Racks for holding plastic vials can be made simply by boring par-
tial holes of appropriate diameter in slabs of styrofoam plastic (see).
REARING CONTAINERS. A variety of containers, plastic, glass and card-
board have been used successfully for rearing immature stages. We recom-
mend the use of PLASTIC CUPS sah for mass rearings and PLASTIC VIALS
(see) for individual rearings.
SCREEN TOP. Screen tops for sainit cup or vial cages should be made
from nylon netting (see). If mosquitoes are to be blooded through the screen
use the coarser netting, otherwise the finer mesh. Cut out the center of the
solid polyethylene cap and use the rim to attach the netting to the container.
SHELL VIAL, GLASS (PROCAINE TUBE OR CARTRIDGE). The most
convenient containers for alcohol or formalin preserved specimens are small
shell vials with neoprene stoppers. They are much more Satisfactory than the
procaine tubes or cartridges formerly widely used for this purpose. The filled
shell vials should always be stored dry as there is practically no evaporation
of alcohol through the neoprene stoppers. The shell vial itself can be made to
order from ordinary no. 2 wall glass tubing of 8.75 mm diameter (8.55-8.95
mm) cut to a length of 64 mm by any commercial glass blowing firm. Stoppers
can be obtained from the West Company, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania 19460, in
a variety of sizes and compounds. For the vial diameter given above the fol-
lowing should be used: glass cartridge fitment, diaphragm no. 5, neoprene.
The filled vial will contain, from bottom to top, the specimen(s), a loose cot-
ton plug, the label and the stopper. It is very important, in capping the vial,
to insert a dissecting needle between the neoprene stopper and the wall of the
vial to release the gases under pressure; if this is not done the stopper may
pop off later. A small air bubble should be present in the upper portion of the
vial beneath the neoprene stopper but air bubbles should be excluded from the
bottom portion of the vial beneath the cotton plug; air bubbles beneath the cot-
ton plug may result in mechanical damage to the specimens when the vials are
shaken, especially during shipping.
SIPHON. A length of rubber tubing may be used to siphon water from tree-
holes or other container habitats located above ground. Use mouth suction to
start the siphon and collect water in a suitable container held below the level
of the breeding site.
SORTING CONTAINERS. A variety of containers are used for sorting im-
mature stages in the field (enamel pans, metal buckets and so on) but we re-
commend light weight PLASTIC SORTING CONTAINERS (see).
SQUEEZE BOTTLE (WASH). A plastic (polyethylene) bottle with attached
tapered plastic tubing for dispensing liquids by squeezing the bottle is very
handy for filling shell vials with alcohol. Never use the stream of alcohol di-
rectly on specimens.
STATIC ELECTRICITY. Difficulty is sometimes encountered with plastic
74 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
pillboxes or other containers becoming charged with static electricity with the
annoying result that the specimens placed in the container are drawn to and
cling to the walls. The static electricity can sometimes be discharged by
touching the inside of the container with a metal object such as a pair of small
scissors.
STERNO STOVE. A small simple collapsible field stove using cans of so-
lidified alcohol as fuel; available in drugstores in most cities throughout the
world; recommended for heating water for killing immature stages in the field.
STYROFOAM. Rigid, light weight expanded polystyrene plastic insulation
material in sheets is recommended as packing insulation in shipping containers.
Styrofoam can be used to make racks for plastic vials.
SUBLOT. Subdivision of a collection (lot) for individual species represented
in that collection or for individual females in progeny rearings. See COLLEC-
TION NUMBER.
SUCTION TUBE. See ASPIRATOR.
SURGICAL WADDING. See COTTON.
TISSUE PAPER. Soft absorbent tissue paper (facial, handkerchief, bath-
room) should be used for strips in killing tubes or for protection of mass col-
lections of adults in plastic cups or vials.
WATER CAN. See PLASTIC WATER CAN.
WET STRENGTH PAPER. Discs for oviposition and for the attachment of
the immature stages of Mansonia should be cut from brown, wet strength crepe
paper obtainable from paper houses in the larger cities. This tough paper is
used for packaging and is treated with small amounts of a synthetic resin to re-
duce water absorption. If this paper is not available coarse commercial grade
paper hand towels may be used.
REFERENCES CITED
Bates, Marston |
1944. Notes on the construction and use of stable traps for mosquito stud-
ies. Natl. Malarial Soc., J. 3: 135-145.
Belkin, John N.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Vol 1.
Berkeley, U. Calif. Press. 608 p.
Belkin, John N., R. X. Schick, P. Galindo and T. H. G. Aitken
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae) I. A project for a systematic
study of the mosquitoes of Middle America. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contr.
2: 1-17.
Bruce-Chwatt, Leonard J.
1964. A simple device for anesthetizing mosquitoes with carbon dioxide.
Mosquito News 24: 222-223. :
Carpenter, Stanley J. and W. J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley, U. Calif.
Press. 360 p.
Earle, Walter C.
1949. Trapping and deflection of anopheline mosquitoes in Boyd, Mark F.
Malariology. Philadelphia, Saunders. p. 1221-1231.
Forattini, Oswaldo P. 7
1962. Entomologia Medica. Voll. Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Higiene e
Saude Publica. 662 p.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods [s,
Gressitt, J. Linsley and M. K. Gressitt
1962. An improved Malaise trap. Pacific Insects 4: 87-90.
Holdridge, Leslie R.
1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data.
Science 105: 367-368.
Hopkins, George H. E. and P. F. Mattingly
1952. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. I.-Larval bionomics of mosqui-
toes and taxonomy of culicine larvae. Ed. 2. London, British Museum
(Nat... Hist). S355/p.
Horsfall, William R.
1955. Mosquitoes, their bionomics and relation to disease. New York,
Ronald Press. 1723 p.
Howard, LelandO., H. G. Dyar and F. Knab
(1913). The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies.
Vol 1. Washington, Carnegie Inst. 520 p. (Carnegie P. 159).
King, Willard V., G. H. Bradley, C. N. Smith and W. C. Mc Duffie
1960. A handbook of the mosquitoes of the Southeastern United States.
U.S..D. A. Agr. -Handb. 172... 188 p.
Laurence, B. R., R. Page and S. A. Smith
1962. Laboratory colonization of Mansonia mosquitoes. B. Ent. Res. 53:
515-519.
Macdonald, William W.
1960. On the systematics and ecology of Armigeres subgenus Leicesteria
(Diptera, Culicidae). Inst. Med. Res. Fed. Malaya, Studies 29: 110-153
(Malaysian Parasites XXXVIII).
Magoon, Estus H.
1935. A portable trap for capturing mosquitoes. B. Ent. Res. 26: 363-372.
Malaise, Rene
1937. A new insect-trap. Ent. Tidskrift 58: 148-160.
Marks, Elizabeth N.
1957. The subgenus Ochlerotatus in the Australian Region (Diptera: Culici-
dae) 1. Notes on classification, with description of a new species.
Queensland U. Papers, Ent. 1: 71-83.
Matheson, Robert
1944. Handbook of the mosquitoes of North America. Ed. 2. Ithaca, Com-
stock Publishing Co. 314 p.
Mulhern, Thomas D. |
1953. Better results with mosquito light traps through standardizing me-
chanical performance. Mosquito News 13: 130-133.
Russell, Paul F., L. S. West, R. D. Manwell and G. MacDonald
1963. Practical Malariology. London, Oxford U. Press. 750 p.
Shannon, Raymond C.
1939. Methods for collecting and feeding mosquitoes in jungle yellow fever
_ studies. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 19: 131-140.
1943. Trinidad Government-Rockefeller Foundation: Malaria Annual Re-
port of the Cooperative work in Trinidad and Tobago. Port-of-Spain,
Government Printers.
Sudia, W. D. and R. W. Chamberlain |
1962. Battery-operated light trap, an improved model. Mosquito News
22: 126-129. ,
Townes, Henry K. :
(1963). Design for a Malaise trap. Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 64: 253-262.
76 Contrib: Amer: Ent. Inst’, vol, 'd,;mo. 2, 1965
Trembley, Helen L.
1955. Mosquito culture techniques and experimental procedures. Amer.
Mosq. Control Assoc., B. 3, 73 p.
Worth, C. Brooke and A. H. Jonkers
1962. Two traps for mosquitoes attracted to small vertebrate animals.
Mosq. News 22: 18-21.
Zulueta, Julian de
1950. A study of the habits of the adult mosquitoes nia in the savannas
of Eastern Colombia. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 30: 325-339.
Belkin et al: Collection, Rearing and Preservation Methods 717
MOSQUITOES OF MIDDLE AMERICA
Code: Date:
INN DOI so ee be Collector:
Eig lity ss a at ani Warn a POI a LOIN a cee
DA Stri Cts 2 nee ass Seen Country! sce aes oe Photos
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT -1. Woody plants:height 0-2-8-15-30m; density0-1-2-3 2. Herbs, grasses:height 0-.5-1-2-5- 8m;
density 0-1-2-3 3.Epiphytes: 0-1-2-3 4. Edge or interior of vegetation, along road, dike, bank 5. Shore of sea, lake, stream
mangrove, saltmarsh 6. Virgin vegetation, clearing, grazing, plantation, cultivation, domestic 7. Light:deep shade, partial shade, full sun
Annual rainfall: ca - ~~ >_ scm Rainy season: J- F-M-A-M-J-J-A-S-O-N-D Vegetation type:
IMMATURE STAGES SUBLOTS
Breeding site -1. Pond, lake 2. Ground pool: large, small 3.Animaltracks 4.Swamp interior, | Species | L] 1] P]p|M[FIE|
margin, marshy depression 5. Flooded forest 6.Seepage, spring 7.Well 8.Stream: margin, pool,
blocked 9. Ditch, drain 10. Fountain, gutter 11.Crabhole:large, small. 12. Rockhole:volcanic, coral ery ee
stream margin, seaside 13.Artificial container: large, small:__________14. Treehole:large, ee ee a
Small 5 Fallen‘trees 20 16 (Bamboo: cut or broken, uncut internode i
17; Animal ‘container on oround: a 18. allen leat. frond, spatheis sa +++ 4-
19. Fallen fruit, nut, rind:________. 20.. Attached fruit: ________ 21. Leaf axil: epiphytic, fea
teyirestrials i eee ck lower back ype ies oo eee nce Ce FR a
23.6 Pitchers. ee 4 Trap: bamboo: pot; = eae ae Height of site above ground m ee es Ge A
Water - 1. Permanent, semipermanent, temporary 2. Clear, turbid, colored: __ S| ee Eee ee
3. Stagnant, slow, moderate, strong current 4. Fresh, brackish, salty 5. Foul,slimy, fermenting eee Paes ess
Vegetation in Breeding Site - 1. Abundant, scanty, none 2. Flotage, scum, algae 3. Grassy, eee
herbaceous, woody, 1iOdtine - og eee ee es a Beane S
Bottom - 1. Mud, sand, gravel, rock 2. Organic matter: plant animal
ADULTS
1. Site: (specify exact situation)
3\. Height above. ground. sm
2. Type: biting-landing, swarming, resting, sweeping, 4. Host or bait:_.. SESS
at light: ____tmtm_m________, trap: ____________—_ 5, Time of capture:
No v present O lost INDIVIDUAL REASINGS + dead, preserved in alcohol .
S)
b Species
[i] p[M[F [Sub | Species [1 |p|M|F] Sub | Species [1 | p|M/F |
EB Ss VE ene Os EE Re Vee
Pe ee i ES ee ee ee eT
a. Meee eee ee ae
FE Ls es Re Fe
1
_
o
aS
108 ee ee a
pe ee ee
| -107| 107
1
_
i=)
co
Ue Rae aan ee ee
1
rs
So
2)
I
_
—_
oe
1
ray
_
bo
Ce ja
ee ees
e1oO
1 i 1
ars ee oe
we | Go | DO
“eed BE)
Pass RPL pare Bes
oo se
aT, o;o we | OO
1
_
ie)
Fig. 1. Collection Form
78 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2, 1965
MOSBNTORY OF KISS: AEB
RAN Na GO ES
SOLE RE RE SE
RSE
yy ag sp Sea a
REUSE ARS:
<>
ARINGS |
Sass
‘PUPAL 3
INDIVIDUAL
REARINGS
2. Collection and Rearing Labels
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 2a, 1967
Vb tts, see
ESTUDIOS SOBRE MOSQUITOS (Diptera, Culicidae)
Ia. Un proyecto para un estudio sistematico de los
mosquitos de Meso-América.
Métodos para coleccionar, criar y preservar
mosquitos.
Ila.
Por
John N. Belkin y otros
CONTRIBUTIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number, with
separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a volume.
Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes are
$12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with its
beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total less
than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders for correspondence to the American
Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Parts of Volume 1, with prices
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).
75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
I. Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America.
Il. Belkin, John N., etal. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation of
mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2a. Same as no. 2, but inSpanish. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 3. Matthews, Robert W., 1965. The biology of Heriades carinata Cresson. (Hymenoptera,
Megachilidae). 33 pages, 23 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
No. 4. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
Ill. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from Tonga and Samoa.
IV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of Salem
expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
No. 5. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
V. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America.
95 pages. Price: $2.75, postpaid
No. 6. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1966.
VI. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from North America.
39 pages. Price $1.00, postpaid
No. 7. DeLong, Dwight M. and Paul H. Freytag, 1967. Studies of the world Gyponinae
(Homopotera, Cicadellidae). A synopsis of the genus Ponana.
86 pages, 257 figures. Price: $2.50, postpaid
No. 8. Contributions to the mosquito fauna of southeast Asia.
I, Delfinado, Mercedes D. The genus Aedes, subgenus Neomacleaya Theobald in
Thailand.
55 pages, 20 figures. Price: $1.75, postpaid
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 2a, 1967
ESTUDIOS SOBRE MOSQUITOS (Diptera, Culicidae)
Ia. Un proyecto para un estudio sistematico de los
mosquitos de Meso-América.
Ila. Métodos para coleccionar, criar y preservar
mosquitos.
Por
John N. Belkin y otros
; is
oon
ao siytavse anny
ny
ESTUDIOS SOBRE MOSQUITOS (Diptera, Culicidae)
Ia. UN PROYECTO PARA UN ESTUDIO SISTEMATICO DE LOS
MOSQUITOS DE MESO-AMERICA!
Por
John N. Pada” Robert X. Schick“, Pedro Galindo®
y Thomas H. G. Aitken4
Traduccion por
Pablo Barreto», Felipe J. Martin? y Abdiel J. Adames?
1 ; ios _
Esta investigacion es sostenida en parte por la Donacion para Investiga-
cidn AI-04379 del U. S. Public Health Service, National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases y en parte por U. S. Army Medical Research and De-
velopment Command, Department of the Army, bajo el Contrato de Investiga-
cion DA-49-193-MD-2478.
: Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Califor-
nia 90024, U.S.A.
. Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Apartado 6991, Panama, Republica de Pa-
nama.
s Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory, P.O. Box 164, Port of Spain, Tri-
nidad.
i Centro Internacional de Investigacion y Entrenamiento Médicos (ICMRT),
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Valle, Apartado Aéreo 2188, Cali,
Colombia. :
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent.‘Inst: , vol. 1, no: 2, 1965
INTRODUCTION
Definition of Area. Middle America, as here defined, comprises Central
America and the West Indies as well as adjacent portions of North America
and South America and their islands, within the following arbitrary boundaries:
in the north the 35° parallel and in the south the northern margin of the Amazon
basin westward across the Andes to Punta Parinas in northern Peru (fig. 1).
The region thus defined comprises the following political divisions: United
States (Southwestern, Southern and Southeastern States), Mexico (including
Guadelupe and Revillagigedo islands), British Honduras, Guatemala, Honduras,
El Salvador, Nicaragua, Clipperton Island, Costa Rica (including Cocos Is-
land), Panama, Colombia (all except southeastern part), Ecuador (western part
and Galapagos Islands), Peru (extreme northwestern tip), French Guiana, Su-
rinam, British Guiana, Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago, British West Indies
and other dependencies, Netherlands West Indies, French West Indies, Virgin
Islands, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Cuba, Bahama Is-
lands and Bermuda.
Current Status of Knowledge. The mosquito fauna of Middle America has
not been studied as a unit since the monumental monograph ''The Mosquitoes of
North and Central America and the West Indies" by Howard, Dyar and Knab
(1912-1917) which was based on field work carried out primarily from 1905
through 1908, at the time of the building of the Panama Canal, and the revision
and supplement to this monograph, ''The Mosquitoes of the Americas," by Dy-
ar (1928). In spite of the vast amount of material and information that has ac-
cumulated in nearly 50 years, little progress has been made in understanding
or adequately describing this mosquito fauna since the appearance of the first
publication mentioned above. Lane's ''Neotropical Culicidae" (1953), the latest
general work covering the area, is inadequate because of incomplete coverage,
superficial treatment of species and unreliable keys and illustrations. At the
present, one has to rely for identification in many groups on Dyar (1928) or e-
ven Howard, Dyar and Knab (1915, 1917). While many new species have been
described and several regional lists and studies have been made (notably Andu-
ze 1947; Bonne and Bonne-Wepster 1925; Carpenter and LaCasse 1955; Cova-
Garcia 1961; Fauran 1961; Hill and Hill 1948; Komp 1936; Kumm, Komp and
Ruiz 1940; Kumm and Zuniga 1942; van der Kuyp 1954; Martini 1935; Patino-
Camargo 1940; Perez Vigueras 1956; Tulloch 1937; Vargas 1956, 1959; Vargas
and Martinez Palacios 1956), only a few groups have been studied in some de-
tail for the entire area (notably Belkin and Hogue 1959; Foote 1954; Forattini
1961; Galindo, Blanton and Peyton 1954; Komp 1942; Rozeboom and Komp 1950;
Simmons and Aitken 1942). The immature stages of many species are not
known at present and in many groups species are differentiated primarily or
entirely on male genitalia. In several groups it is impossible to get accurate
identification even of common species. In many instances very distinct spe-
cies have been erroneously synonymized with widespread species on very su-
perficial characters. No attempt has been made to analyze the mosquito fauna
of the entire area, very little attention has been paid to the study of nonbiting
forms and only a few species have been completely described in all stages.
In recent years a great deal of new material and information have been ob-
tained in several localities in this area in connection with studies on mosquito-
borne diseases. The material has been studied only as pressure of other work
Belkin et al: Project on Mosquitoes of Middle America 3
has permitted and the data obtained have not been summarized or systemati-
cally analyzed. At the present time extensive projects on malaria eradication
are in operation in this area, much other mosquito control work is being car-
ried on and extensive studies on insect-borne viruses are in progress. This is
a most propitious time to carry out a systematic project on the mosquito fauna
of the entire area because there is a great need for a more detailed and more
readily available knowledge of the taxonomy, distribution and bionomics of
vector species and because of the willingness, even eagerness, of many work-
ers to contribute to the project through collections, rearings, observations
and detailed studies.
Significance of Project. This project should contribute materially to a bet-
ter understanding of the mosquito fauna of Middle America. From a practical
standpoint this may be of considerable importance in the control of mosquito-
borne diseases in the area. It would also be of considerable value for the epi-
demiological studies on mosquito-borne viruses currently being carried out in
Middle America. The cooperative studies and the training of students from
Middle America may be of significance in providing a stimulus for independent
studies of this type in the future.
In addition to the strictly utilitarian aspects, the mosquito fauna of Middle
America is of extraordinary interest to the biologist because it is the most
unique and precinctive (endemic) one in the world: In this area all the ''neo-
tropical’ phylads (natural groups) are represented and several of these are
completely precinctive to Middle America. There are also several annectent
precinctive ''nearctic'’ phylads in this area. Although many biogeographers
regard Middle America, and particularly Mexico and Central America, as a
transitional zone between the Nearctic and Neotropical regions, there are in-
dications that at least in the case of mosquitoes this area has been the main
center of origin and distribution of the precinctive phylads of the New World
(Belkin 1961: 164, 1962: 57-59). Ona worldwide basis only the intercontinen-
tal Indo-Pacific area has been of greater importance in the evolution of mos-
quitoes. It is also evident that in Middle America there are many relict spe-
cies and that their present distributions may be of considerable value in recon-
structing the geological history and understanding the biogeography of the New
World. A more thorough knowledge of this mosquito fauna in all its aspects
will undoubtedly contribute materially to a better understanding of the mor-
phology, ecology and evolution of mosquitoes. :
History and Future Development of Project. Belkin became interested in
this area following the collection of several Arizona and California mosquitoes
which exhibited affinities with Mexican and Central American forms (Belkin
and McDonald 1955, 1956, 1957; McDonald 1957a, 1957b; McDonald and Belkin
1961). After a study of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites
(Belkin and Hogue 1959) it was decided to organize a project on the ''Mosqui-
toes of Middle America!’ and to seek support from the U.S. Public Health Ser-
vice. The project began in January 1962 under Research Grant AI-04379 and
received additional support in August 1963 from U.S. Army Medical Research
and Development Command. Charles L. Hogue was Co-investigator from the
beginning to June 30, 1964 and Robert X. Schick, who joined the project in No-
vember 1963, became Co-investigator on July 1, 1964.
From its beginning the project received enthusiastic support from a large
number of individuals and organizations in Middle America. The purpose of
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
Co-investigador desde el inicio hasta el 30 de Junio de 1964 y Robert X. Schick,
quien se unio al proyecto en Noviembre de 1963, paso a ser Co-investigador a
partir del 1 de Julio de 1964.
Desde su inicio el proyecto recibio entusiasta ayuda de un gran nimero de
personas y organizacionss de Meso-América. El proposito del presente arti-
culo es describir las finalidades, objetivos, organizacion y la metodologia del
proyecto ''Mosquitos de Meso-América" y llevarlo a la atencién de todos los
individuos e instituciones interesadas en los mosquitos del area. Debe antici-
parse, que por su naturaleza, este proyecto es a largo plazo; se llevara a
cabo en un periodo de 10 a 15 afios y solo alcanzara éxito completo si se cuen-
ta con la cooperacion de los investigadores de todos los paises del area. Tam-
bien deseamos sefialar a los interesados, que varias facilidades y servicios se
prestan actualmente, o seran obtenibles muy pronto, en nuestro laboratorio
principal en la University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
FINALIDAD Y OBJETIVOS
Los objetivos primarios del proyecto son: (1) describir e ilustrar en deta- ©
lle todos los estadios conocidos de los mosquitos encontrados en el area, (2)
compendiar, para todas las especies, toda la informacion facilmente disponi-
ble sobre distribuciOn, bionomia y relacién con enfermedades, (3) analizar la
fauna de mosquitos del area desde el punto de vista de su composicién, origen
y evolucion y sus relaciones con la fauna de mosquitos del resto del mundo y
(4) depositar todos los datos obtenidos en publicaciones preliminares y luego
definitivas.
Sera estudiada toda la familia Culicidae en su sentido mas amplio, con la
inclusion de las subfamilias Culicinae (mosquitos verdaderos), Dixinae y Chao-
borinae (falsos mosquitos). La magnitud y complejidad del proyecto pueden a-
preciarse si se tiene en cuenta, que actualmente cerca de 600 especies han
sido sefialadas para el area que hemos definido en la INTRODUCCION (Stone,
Knight y Starcke 1959; Stone 1961, 1963) y es evidente que hay muchas especies
no descritas 0 sinonimizadas incorrectamente. Muchas de las formas indige-
nas han sido identificadas con especies de distribuciOn mas amplia, las cuales
fueron descritas originalmente fuera del area, basandose en ligeras compara-
ciones y Sin conocimiento completo de los estadios juveniles. En el curso de
este estudio se debera considerar un total de 1420 formas descritas nominal-
mente. Es probable que eventualmente sean reconocidas mas de 1000 especies
para el area. Es obvio por lo tanto, que un proyecto sistematico, planeado a
largo termino y mediante un tratamiento taxonémico en todas sus fases, nos ha
de capacitar para obtener un conocimiento razonable de esta compleja fauna.
ORGANIZACION
Laboratorio de los Angeles. El cuartel general del proyecto esta localiza-
do en el Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
Los profesionales a cargo del proyecto actualmente son: John N. Belkin, Direc-
tor del Proyecto y Robert X. Schick, Co-investigador. El personal técnico in-
cluye tres técnicos a tiempo completo y varios asistentes, dibujantes y estudian-
tes, a tiempo parcial. Existe a la disposicion todo el equipo necesario para el
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 5
trabajo taxondmico (microscopios, ayudas mecanicas para las ilustraciones,
fuentes de luz, etc.), lo mismo que un cuarto para la cria de mosquitos. Aqui
se mantiene igualmente la coleccion central de la investigacion de los mosquitos
de Meso-América y una coleccion representativa de mosquitos del mundo, es-
pecialmente representada por formas de Australasia (véase MATERIAL). Se
esta preparando un archivo completo, clasificado, de la literatura sobre-los
mosquitos de Meso-América y sera accesible a todos los interesados (vease
DOCUMENTACION). El Laboratorio procesa y prepara para su estudio todo el
material y mantiene el registro de todos los datos obtenidos para el proyecto.
También mantiene en existencia el material y equipo necesario para el trabajo
de campo. La mayoria de los estudios taxondmicos se llevaran a cabo en este
laboratorio por el personal de UCLA, en forma independiente 0 conjuntamente
con los cooperadores. Todas las facilidades y servicios del laboratorio se su-
ministran gratuitamente a los cooperadores, incluyendo la identificacion de ma-
terial, ilustracioOn y preparacion de manuscritos para publicacion por el siste-
ma foto-offset. Los miembros del personal de UCLA realizaran también espe-
ciales estudios de campo, lo mismo que las encuestas en areas donde no haya
cooperadores y tomaran parte en el entrenamiento de técnicos para proyectos
cooperativos de campo.
Cooperadores. Aunque el programa sobre ''Mosquitos de Meso-America"
fué originalmente planeado como un proyecto de investigaciOn personal, este
es ahora un esfuerzo cooperativo informal de muchos individuos y organizacio-
nes en el area, tal como se reconoce en los AGRADECIMIENTOS. Su mag-
nitud y utilidad depende en gran parte del auxilio de los cooperadores persona-
les. Hasta la fecha muy buena parte del material de estudio ha sido obtenido
gracias a los cooperadores voluntarios. Se ha planeado que la mayoria del fu-
turo trabajo de campo sea realizado por personal local bajo la supervision de
cooperadores calificados, con la asistencia, cuando Sea necesaria y deseada,
de UCLA en materia de coordinacion, instrucciones, entrenamiento, materia-
les y equipo (véase TRABAJO DE CAMPO). Otras formas por medio de las
cuales los cooperadores pueden contribuir con el proyecto son: ofreciendo da-
tos (incluyendo reimpresos de trabajos) y material previamente colectado, su-
ministrando facilidades en el campo para el personal de UCLA y emprendiendo
estudios sobre la fauna local, bien sean estos independientes o en conjunto. Se
estan llevando a cabo estudios taxonomicos conjuntos entre personal profesio-
nal calificado de Meso-América y miembros de UCLA y se ha planeado movili-
zar a Los Angeles, por periodos cortos, a cierto numero de estos investigado-
res para trabajar en problemas especiales. Esperamos, eventualmente, tener
por lo menos en cada pais un cooperador, con el cual se emprenderan estudios
conjuntos sobre la fauna local o sobre grupos especiales. Como Sse ha indicado
anteriormente, el laboratorio de Los Angeles suministrara cierto numero de
facilidades a los cooperadores, no solo para estudios conjuntos sino también
para investigaciones independientes sobre mosquitos del area. En la seccion
MATERIAL se discute el destino del material obtenido y en la seccion PUBLI-
CACIONES se tratan los acuerdos sobre la autoria de los articulos que se ori-
ginen de estudios conjuntos. Mas adelante se indica la forma de financiamien-
to de los estudios en cooperacion o conjuntos.
Estudiantes. Un factor importante en el proyecto es el entrenamiento de
investigadores para llevar a cabo y ampliar los presentes estudios. Se les
dara oportunidad a alumnos calificados, para proseguir estudios de graduados
en el Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, al mis-
6 Contrib.’ Amer. Ent. inst. , “vol. 1,; “no. “Za; “1967
mo tiempo que estan empleados como Asistentes de Investigacion a tiempo
parcial, en el proyecto. Confiamos de esta manera preparar jOvenes de Meso-
América y elevar su interés para emprender en el futuro, estudios adicionales
independientemente.
Financiamiento. El proyecto es sostenido primordialmente por fondos pa-
ra investigaciones, suministrados por el U.S. Public Health Service y el U.S.
Army Medical Research and Development Command los cuales son administra-
dos por la University of California, Los Angeles (véase pie de nota en la pagi-
na 1). Las facilidades en Los Angeles son suministradas por la University of
California. De las donaciones hay fondos limitados disponibles para pagar los
servicios de individuos, organizaciones o instituciones cooperadoras. En ge-
neral estos fondos se pueden utilizar para gastos relacionados con la coleccion,
cria y envio de material expresamente obtenido para el proyecto. Todos los
implementos y equipo para el trabajo de campo seran tambien suministrados
por UCLA. Sin embargo no es practico comprar vehiculos 0 emplear personal
a tiempo completo con los fondos disponibles para la investigacion. Por lo tan-
to se espera que las entidades cooperadoras cubran estas necesidades, sin em-
bargo, los gastos adicionales les seran reembolsados cuando ello sea necesario.
De igual modo se espera que algunas de las organizaciones cooperadoras inclu-
yan este proyecto como parte de sus actividades regulares y provean los fondos,
para su fase del trabajo, en sus presupuestos ordinarios. Para el destino del
material obtenido en el trabajo de campo financiado conjuntamente, véase la
seccion MATERIAL.
Los fondos de la Investigacion también se pueden utilizar para que coope-
radores calificados se puedan desplazar, por cortos periodos, al laboratorio
de Los Angeles, con el proposito de realizar estudios taxonomicos especiales,
ya sean estos en forma individual o en colaboracion; igualmente existen fondos
para financiar a jovenes calificados de Meso-América para proseguir estudios
de graduados en la University of California, Los Angeles, mediante su partici-
pacion en el proyecto como Asistentes de Investigacion. Todas las publicacio-
nes relacionadas con el proyecto seran financiadas con los fondos de la Inves-
tigacion.
MATERIAL
Naturaleza y Fuente. Se ha planeado estudiar todo el material de mosqui-
tos de Meso-Amé€rica, que actualmente se encuentra preservado en varios mu-
seos, instituciones o en colecciones privadas, e igualmente se ha planeado ha-
cer crias y colecciones especiales en varias localidades estratégicas (véase
TRABAJO DE CAMPO).
Todo el material coleccionado especificamente para el proyecto o que a el
fuere donado, sera procesado, preparado, rotulado y almacenado de una mane-
ra uniforme un UCLA, en donde permanecera como Coleccion de Investigacion
durante la extensi6n del proyecto. También se obtendra material adicional, a
manera de préstamo, de varias instituciones 0 museos 0 el mismo sera estu-
diado en los lugares respectivos.
Rotulos. Las colecciones realizadas para el proyecto llevaran una etiqueta
impresa, distintiva, con la localidad general por paises, con una o mas letras
claves (cddigo) para cada pais y una simple secuencia numérica consecutiva,
que comienza con el No. 1 para todas las colecciones y para cada letra codigo
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América i
(fig. 2). Todos los datos correspondientes a cada captura, incluyendo la lo-
calidad exacta, ingresaran a una tarjeta patron de registro (véase TRABAJO
DE CAMPO y Belkin, Hogue et al 1965, 1967) y los datos de esas tarjetas
seran compilados y publicados periddicamente (véase PUBLICACIONES). Todo
ejemplar identificado en el curso del proyecto llevara una etiqueta distintiva
para la especie (fig. 2), agregada al alfiler, o a la lamina o incluida dentro
del frasco, donde se escribira la fecha de identificacion (dos Ultimos digitos
del afio) y el signo del sexo masculino (si este falta, el espécimen es una
hembra).
Proceso. Con el proposito de mantener uniformidad y evitar pérdidas de
tiempo, no se haran montajes permanentes en el campo de adultos o de estados
juveniles. El material sera preservado, empacado y remitido segun los méto-
dos delineados por Belkin, Hogue et al (1965, 1967). En UCLA se utilizaran
técnicas uniformes para el proceso de todo el material, siguiendo en general
los métodos de Belkin (1962: 68-71). El montaje de adultos en alfileres, se
hara sobre "'puntas" (triangulos) de papel grueso, adhiriendo los especimenes
sobre el lado derecho, con las patas hacia el alfiler y utilizando para ello ce-
mento ''Ambroid.'' Todos los montajes en laminas se haran en "'Euparal" claro
y las preparaciones se cubriran con cubre-objetos circulares de un espesor ti-
po #1.
Destino de los Tipos. hos holotipos, alotipos y paratipos de las nuevas es-
pecies descritas en el curso del proyecto seran depositadas de la manera si-
guiente:
(1) Cuando los holotipos y alotipos sean especimenes colectados por el
proyecto, seran depositados en el United States National Museum (USNM).
(2) Cuando los holotipos, alotipos y/o paratipos sean especimenes obteni-
dos en préstamo de instituciones o individuos, el sitio donde vayan a ser depo-
sitados se determinara mediante consulta con el propietario(s) de los ejempla-
res.
(3) Los paratipos de todas las nuevas especies, hasta donde su numero lo
permita, seran depositados en las siguientes instituciones: UCLA, USNM, Bri-
tish Museum (Nat. Hist.) (BMNH); Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Panama; Fa-
culdade de Higiene e Satde Publica da Universidade de Sdo Paulo, Brasil; Mu-
seo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
(4) Los paratipos de las especies descritas de un pais o dependencia parti-
cular también seran depositados en una institucion nacional cientifica o de in-
vestigacion apropiada, en el pais de origen o en la madre patria como sigue:
COLOMBIA, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Bogota
COSTA RICA, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José
DEPENDENCIAS BRITANCIAS y/o NACIONES DE LA COMUNIDAD BRI-
TANICA, Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory o Institute of Jamaica
DEPENDENCIAS FRANCESAS, Office de la Recherche Scientifique et
Téchnique d'Outre-Mer (ORSTOM), Bondy, France
DEPENDENCIAS HOLANDESAS, Instituut voor Tropische Hygiene, Am-
sterdam
MEXICO, Instituto de Salubridad y Enfermedades Tropicales, México, D. F.
PANAMA, Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Panama
PUERTO RICO e ISLAS VIRGENES, School of Tropical Medicine, Univer-
sity of Puerto Rico
VENEZUELA, Direccion de Malariologia y Saneamiento Ambiental, Ma-
racay
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
Para otros paises, el sitio donde se depositara el material tipo, se desig-
nara posteriormente.
Colecci6n de Investigacion. La gran mayoria del material colectado por
el proyecto o que le haya sido donado formara la Coleccion de Investigacion,
lo cual permanecera en el Department of Zoology, University of California, Los
Angeles, durante la extension del proyecto y estara disponible, para su estu-
dio, a cualquier investigador calificado, bajo previa solicitud del mismo. Una
vez terminado el proyecto la colecci6n sera depositada "in toto," si hay facili-
dades para ello, en el U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., si estas son
limitadas, sera depositada, en Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History,
Los Angeles, California.
Colecciones Regionales de Referencia. Una coleccion representativa de
las especies existentes en cada pais sera depositada en las instituciones antes
mencionadas, como depositarias de los paratipos. Colecciones representativas
de las especies cuya distribucion cubra la totalidad del area, se depositaran en
USNM, BMNH y en las instituciones mencionadas anteriormente que tengan in-
teres en dicha muestra. 3
Servicio de Identificaci6n. El Laboratorio de UCLA procurara suminis-
trar un servicio de identificacién de los mosquitos del area comenzando de in-
mediato; no obstante, para algunos grupos no sera posible hacer identificacio-
nes especificas durante algun tiempo. El material enviado para su identifica-
cidn debe ser preparado y empacado segtn los métodos especificados en Belkin,
Hogue et al (1965, 1967). Una parte del material identificado se conservara en
UCLA.
DOC UMENTACION
En un proyecto de esta magnitud y complejidad es esencial que todos los
datos estén disponsibles rapidamente para su uso y comparacion. Por consi-
guiente se hara un esfuerzo especial en proveer un centro de documentacion
para el proyecto, en UCLA, y toda la informacion estara disponible a investi-
gadores calificados bajo previa solicitud de los mismos.
Archivo de Literatura. Se preparara y mantendra un archivo completo de
toda la literatura que trate de los mosquitos de Meso-América en los campos
de taxonomia, bionomia, distribucién y relacioOn con enfermedades. Los arti-
culos individuales seran reproducidos mediante xerografia y parte de esas co-
pias seran archivadas bajo encabezamientos apropiadamente clasificados se-
gun se indica mas adelante. Solicitamos de manera apremiante a todos los
cooperadores el envio de reimpresos de todos los trabajos e informes, parti-
cularmente los aparecidos localmente, al archivo de literatura de UCLA, ala
mas breve oportunidad.
Archivo de Coleccién. Se usara una forma patron (Belkin, Hogue, et al
1965, 1967) para registrar todos los datos pertinentes a las colecciones de
campo hechas para el proyecto. Estas fornias serviran de base para compi-
laciones sobre distribucién, bionomfia y andalisis faunisticos. De ellas también
se archivaran copias xerograficas bajo las respectivas especies, obteniéndose
asi registros de distribucién, lo mismo que datos bionomicos.
Archivo TaxonoOmico. Todos los datos pertenecientes a una determinada
categoria taxondmica se reproduciran mediante xerografia (u otro proceso se-
mejante) y se mantendran en el archivo bajo ese taxon. Aqui se incluiran par-
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 9
tes pertinentes de todos los trabajos publicados sobre dicho taxon y los datos
sin publicar acumulados en el curso de la presente investigacion, es decir,
todos los registros de coleccion y distribucion, ilustraciones y notas.
Archivo de Distribucion. Para cada isla o pais se prepararan: (1) un ar-
chivo de todas las especies descritas originalmente de dicha localidad y (2) un
archivo de todas las especies senaladas para la misma.
TRABAJO DE CAMPO
Objetivo. En la actualidad se dispone de una vasta cantidad de material de
mosquitos de Meso-América, pero muy poco de ese material incluye crias in-
dividuales o de progenies, sin las cuales no es posible hacer asociaciones defi-
nitivas de sexos y estadios juveniles y, con ello, iograr identificaciones espe-
cificas correctas. Es por consiguiente esencial para el presente proyecto, la
obtencion de ese tipo de material. Un censo completo de todas las especies que
ocurren en Meso-América no podria llevarse a cabo en el periodo de vida de
una sola generacion de investigadores atn cuando se realizen colecciones sis-
tematicas continuas, afio atras afio, a través de toda el area. Para el presen-
te proyecto, los estudios de campo tendran que limitarse a los aspectos mas
significativos que sean necesarios para lograr colocar el estudio de los mos-
quitos del area sobre bases consistentes.
Atn cuando se ha acumulado considerable material de algunas areas, desde
cuando se inicio el trabajo de campo del proyecto en Noviembre de 1962, sera
necesario llevar a cabo estudios de campo, mas o menos extensos, durante va-
rios afios en casi todos los paises incluidos en el proyecto. Ademas, como mu-
chas de las especies importantes sefialadas para Meso-América fueron descri-
tas originalmente del Brasil y Argentina, y unas cuantas de Bolivia, Chile, Pa-
raguay, Peru y Uruguay, sera esencial obtener crias de material topotipico de
esas formas, bien sea realizando trabajos de campo en esos paises o por inter-
cambio con cooperadores locales.
Personal. Siempre que sea posible el trabajo de campo sera hecho por
personal local bajo la supervision de cooperadores, despues de un breve perio-
do de entrenamiento por un miembro del personal cientifico de UCLA. Donde
no haya cooperadores, el personal de UCLA hara las colecciones y las crias.
Cada uno de los Asistentes de Investigacién pasara por lo menos dos meses en
el campo haciendo encuestas o trabajando en problemas especiales, preferible-
mente, operando desde una de las instituciones colaboradoras.
Métodos. las colecciones y crias se haran siguiendo técnicas sencillas,
usando equipo y formularios uniformizados que nos habilitaran para obtener
una gran cantidad de material homogéneo (véase Belkin, Hogue et al 1965, 1967).
Si bien se hara énfasis sobre crias individuales y de progenies es también muy
importante obtener colecciones generales de adultos y de fases inmaduras. To-
do el material sera procesado, montado e identificado provisionalmente en
UCLA.
Encuestas Topotipicas. Al comienzo se hara énfasis, primordialmente en
la obtencion de crias individuales y/o de progenies de material topotipico de
las especies descritas del area. También sera necesario obtener material
similar de las especies descritas fuera del area, pero sefialadas para Meso-
América, a fin de establecer la verdadera identidad de las formas meso-ame-
ricanas. En vista de que en muchas ocasiones las localidades tipo han sido
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
destruidas o no son accesibles, sera necesario obtener este material de un
habitat similar, tan cercano como se posible a la localidad tipo original. En
el periodo de las encuestas topotipicas, se colectaran y se criaran otras espe-
cies, Siempre y cuando las condiciones y los recursos lo permitan.
Encuestas Generales. Siempre que sea factible se iniciaran, en cada pais,
encuestas generales para obtener una muestra de la mayor cantidad de habitats
de diferentes tipos en las distintas regiones, particularmente en aquellas re-
giones donde previamente no se hayan realizado encuestas. Todo material que
pueda ser obtenido con facilidad, como el relacionado con estudios de arbovirus
o proyectos de erradicacion de la malaria, sera de gran valor para la pre-
sente investigacion.
Problemas Especiales. En areas seleccionadas se emprenderan especiales
e intensivos trabajos de campo, en relaciOn con problemas taxondmicos, de
dispersion o ecologicos. Falta informacion detallada de las relaciones bion6-
micas y ecologicas de la mayoria de los grupos de Meso-América. A causa de
la significacion biogeografica se dedicara particular atencién a las especies
que ocupan ciertos tipos de habitat, especialmente cuevas de cangrejos, hue-
cos en arboles y axilas de hojas de plantas. La especificidad de la asociaci6én
de mosquitos que se crian en las axilas de las hojas de ciertas especies de
plantas no esta bien documentada y, también, recibira atencidén especial.
PROCEDIMIENTOS DE LA INVESTIGACION
Personal. Los procedimientos aqui descritos han sido desarrollados
originalmente por el personal cientifico de UCLA y seran modificados de
acuerdo a las necesidades de los estudios cooperativos especiales. Se espera
que los cooperadores participen durante toda la extension del proyecto, en to-
dos los diferentes tipos de estudios que seran delineados mas adelante.
Estudios Taxonomicos. ha investigacién basica del proyecto consistira |
en estudios taxonomicos de diversos tipos, incluyendo los siguientes: (1) revi-
siones preliminares de grupos de especies, subgeneros y géneros, (2) descrip-
ciones de formas nuevas y de estados no descritos previamente, (3) monogra-
fias completas de grupos importantes y (4) un re-examen total de la fauna en
relacion con la publicacion final, en forma de libro.
Las revisiones preliminares estaran primordialmente basadas en material
identificado que ha sido obtenido en préstamo de museos importantes y de todo
nuevo material topotipico criado, que se obtenga al inicio del proyecto. Estas
revisiones serviran como punto de partida para posteriores monografias y
suministraran claves provisionales de identificaci6n para ser usadas, tanto
en el campo como en el laboratorio. Se ha planeado hacer revisiones prelimi-
nares de todos los grupos, comenzando con los mas simples y sobresalientes.
En tales revisiones, por lo menos una especie dentro de cada grupo sera ilus-
trada completamente. Para las descripciones de nuevos estados o especies
se haran, en lo posible, ilustraciones completas de cada estado, lo que for-
mara la base para las monografias, las cuales se iniciaran solo cuando se
pueda disponer del material topotipico de la mayoria de las especies.
Procedimientos Taxonomicos. Los procedimientos taxonémicos genera-
les, terminologia y métodos de presentacion seguiran el patrén empleado en
Mosquitos of the South Pacific (Belkin 1962). Todos los estudios taxonémicos
se basaran, siempre que sea posible, en la consideraci6n de todos los estados,
machos, hembras, pupas, larvas y huevos. De una muestra de cada colecci6n
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 11
se prepararan en laminas adultos completos y genitalias tanto masculinas como
femeninas. Ademas de la preparacion de laminas con las mudas de larvas y pu-
pas asociadadas, también se prepararan muestras de larvas de cada coleccion.
Del material seleccionado por el personal profesional, se haran dibujos
preliminares de los adultos (morfologfa externa completa o sus detalles) y de
las larvas y pupas (quetotaxia y morfologfa externa completa de ambas) de cada
especie que tenga sus sexos y estados asociados. Usando estos dibujos preli-
minares los Asistentes de Investigacién revisaran otro material (diez o mas
especimenes), de la presunta misma especie, para registrar en formas espe-
ciales, el alcance de la variacion en la expresion de todos los caracteres dibu-
jados, en la misma poblacion y en otras poblaciones. Es probable que en esta
etapa aparezcan formas no descritas previamente. Caracteres distintivos, se-
ran entonces seleccionados por el personal profesional, y con base a ellos se
prepararan claves para todos los estados. Luego, todo el material de un grupo
sera confrontado con las claves para los caracteres de diagnostico. Es pro-
bable que en este proceso se encuentren formas nuevas adicionales. Final-
mente, el personal cientifico preparara la descripcidn de cada estado para
una determinada especie y se registraran las variaciones ecologicas y geogra-
ficas significativas.
Los dibujos y descripciones finales seran hechos para la poblacion topoti-
pica y no seran la representacion de un solo individuo. Las poblaciones que
varien geografica y ecol6gicamente seran estudiadas tan integramente como lo
permita el material y el tiempo. A través de todo el trabajo taxonoOmico se
hara énfasis en la presentacion de datos graficos y numéricos. Las descrip-
ciones se limitaran a los caracteres distintivos y variables que no se puedan
representar graficamente. Aquellos atributos compartidos por un grupo de
especies se daran en la descripcion de ese grupo. Se prepararan claves para
los adultos, las genitalias masculinas, pupas y larvas del cuarto instar, y
cuando sea posible, para los huevos y para los otros instars larvarios y la
genitalia femenina.
A fin de establecer la identidad de especies descritas previamente, sera
necesario que el personal cientifico estudie especimenes tipos localizados en
varias instituciones de las Américas, Europa y Africa del Norte. El material
comparado con los tipos sera marcado convenientemente y depositado en la
Coleccion de Investigacion de UCLA, para su estudio posterior.
DistribucioOn, Bionomia y Relacion con Enfermedades. La informacion
sobre distribuciOn, bionomia y relacion con enfermedades se obtendra de la
literatura, de los registros de colectores anteriores y de las formas patrones
para el registro de las colecciones (Belkin et al 1965, 1967) que se usaran
para todo el trabajo de campo del proyecto. Se emprenderan estudios especia-
les de campo para dilucidar problemas significativos en cuanto a distribucion
y ecologia (véase TRABAJO DE CAMPO). Todos estos registros seran repro-
ducidos mediante xerografia y archivados bajo cada especie individualmente,
y bajo los diversos paises.
Se dibujaran y reproduciran para el proyecto los siguientes mapas: un
mapa general de Meso-América, mapas seccionales de Meso-América a ma-
yor escala y un mapa del Hemisferio Occidental. También se utilizara el
mapa mundial preparado por Belkin (1962). La distribucion total conocida de
todas las especies se mostrara en combinaciones apropiadas de estos mapas.
Siempre que sea posible se sefialaran, agrupados en los mismos mapas, las
distribuciones de los miembros de un grupo.
Toda la informacion sobre distribucion, bionomia y relacion con enferme-
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
dades, sera compendiada en (1) un mapa del area total, con todas las especies
y (2) mapas mas detallados para cada pais.
Analisis de la Fauna. El analisis de la fauna de mosquitos se basara en
la comparacion de las afinidades taxondmicas de las diversas especies (deter-
minada primordialmente con base en el grado de semejanza morfologica en
todos los estados) en diferentes partes de Meso-América y en la distribucion
de grupos de especies a los cuales pertenecen, tanto en areas adyacentes del
Hemisferio Occidental como en la totalidad del mundo. Se prepararan mapas
que muestren la composicion y distribucion detallada de los elementos de la
fauna de mosquitos (por complejos de especies, grupos de especies o unidades
mas altas), en las subdivisiones de la fauna que cubren el area.
PUBLICACIONES
Objetivo. Se produciran tres tipos de publicaciones: (1) articulos prelimi-
nares periodicos a medida que el trabajo progrese, (2) monografias mas ex-
tensas y completas y (3) una obra definitiva y final en varios volimenes.
Autores. Confiamos en que muchos de los trabajos taxondmicos seran
contribuciones conjuntas entre los cooperadores y los miembros del personal
cientifico de UCLA. Se buscara la Co-autoria para todos los articulos que tra-
ten de las faunas locales de mosquitos. En las autorias conjuntas se determi-
nara el orden de prioridad en base a las contribuciones previas de los respec-
tivos autores sobre la materia del articulo. Se invita a los investigadores a
utilizar todas las facilidades de publicacion (incluyendo ilustracion, composi-
cidn y edicién) para todo los trabajos personales que traten de la fauna de
mosquitos del area.
Ilustraciones. En todas las publicaciones se hara énfasis, siempre que
sea posible, al uso preferente de ilustraciones de todo tipo (dibujos, cuadros,
mapas) que al uso de palabras. Con el método de publicaciones que hemos
elegido es mas conveniente y economico el uso de ilustraciones que el empleo
de largos textos. Todos los cooperadores cuentan con las facilidades disponi-
bles en UCLA para la preparacion de ilustraciones. Por razones de unifor-
midad y economia las ilustraciones seran estandarizadas y agrupadas en pa-
ginas enteras para su reproduccion.
Método. La impresion se hara por el método foto-offset. La copia del
texto sera hecha en una maquina de escribir del tipo IBM Executive en UCLA
bajo constante control y supervisi6n y al mismo tiempo se agregaran y rotu-
laran las ilustraciones finales. Este método de publicacion es el mas rapido
y menos costoso, favorece la presentacion grafica y permite el maximo con-
trol de seguridad. La publicacion y distribuciOn seran hechas por el American
Entomological Institute a través de sus publicaciones seriadas establecidas.
El financiamiento de las publicaciones se llevara a cabo a un costo minimo
por pagina para los reimpresos, que sera cargado al proyecto en el caso de
estudios cooperativos y a los individuos o instituciones en el caso de contribu-
ciones independientes.
Articulos Preliminares. Se publicaran, tan rapido como puedan ser pre-
parados, articulos de los siguientes tipos: (1) métodos y técnicas para colec-
cion, cria, preservaci6n y preparaciOn de material, (2) lista de los mosqui-
tos descritos originalmente y/o sefialados para cada pais, (3) claves provisio-
nales para grupos mayores de mosquitos, (4) descripciones de especies nue-
vas y estados no descritos, (5) notas taxonOmicas, sinonimias, cambios de
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 13
estado taxonomico, etc., (6) revisiones preliminares de grupos de especies,
subgéneros y géneros, (7) registros de nuevas localidades, (8) notas biondmi-
cas, (9) registros de capturas de trabajo de campo en cada pais y (10) estudios
especiales cortos. La mayoria de esos articulos seran publicados en las
series "MOSQUITO STUDIES" editadas por Belkin y emitidas como numeros
separados de Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, como en
el caso actual. Se puede obtener una publicacion rapida y econOmica cuando
estén preparadas para su impresion y emision individual, por lo menos 32 pa-
ginas.
Monografias. Estudios completos de grupos taxonomicos importantes, te-
sis de los Asistentes de Investigacion que trabajen en el proyecto, estudios
faunisticos mayores y aquellos estudios extensos que alcancen 300 o mas pagi-
nas impresas, se publicaran como Memoirs of the American Entomological
Institute.
Libro (Obra). Cuando se complete el proyecto se publicara una obra en
varios volumenes que cubra la fauna de mosquitos de la totalidad del area. El
plan general seguira el tratamiento empleado en la obra Mosquitos of the
South Pacific (Belkin 1962). El énfasis en la secci6n taxondmica sera sobre
ilustraciones, proyectandose una pagina completa para (1) adultos y genitalia
femenina (2) genitalia masculina y pupa y (3) larva.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Expresamos nuestra gratitud a las siguientes personas y organizaciones
que hasta la fecha nos han brindado su asistencia, cooperacion y aliento para
complir con este proyecto:
ARGENTINA: A. Bachmann, O. H. Casal, F. Cavalieri y M. Garcia, Ins-
tituto Nacional de Microbiologia, Buenos Aires; R. A. Ronderos, Universidad
Nacional de la Plata, La Plata; Antonio Martinez, San Isidro, Buenos Aires.
BRASIL: L. Deane y O. Forattini, Universidade de SAo0 Paulo.
CANAL ZONE: W. P. Murdoch y M. Keenan, Office of the Surgeon,
USARCARIB.
CAYMAN ISLANDS: M.E.C. Giglioli, Mosquito Research and Control Unit,
Grand Cayman.
CHILE: R. H. Gonzalez, Escuela de Agronomia, Universidad de Chile,
Santiago; L. E. Pefia G., Santiago.
COLOMBIA: E. Osorno-Mesa, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica; R.
Elliott y G. Ruiz, Servicio Nacional de Erradicacion de la Malaria; C. J.
Marinkelle, Universidad de Los Andes; P. Barreto y V. E. Lee, Universidad
del Valle y The Rockefeller Foundacion, Cali.
COSTA RICA: G. Havord, Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas;
F. Granados y G. W. Hunter, International Center for Medical Research and
Training, LSU; J. DeAbate y M. Vargas, Universidad de Costa Rica.
ECUADOR: J. Stivers, AID, Servicio Nacional de Erradicacion de la Ma-
laria, Guayaquil.
EL SALVADOR: J. Austin, Pan American Health Organization, San Sal-
vador.
FRANCE: E. Abonnenc, Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique
Outre-Mer (ORSTOM). ,
GRADELOUPE: P. Fauran, Institut Pasteur.
ia Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
GUATEMALA: J. Ibarra, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural; E. Novales
y O. Ochoa, Servicio Nacional de Malaria; M. Dary R., Universidad de San
Carlos; D. McCorquedale, AID; R. Jenney, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana;
L. M. Drennan, B. J. Diaz, T. A. Holcombe y C. E. Pinto, United Fruit Co.
GUYANE FRANCAISE: H. Floch, Institut Pasteur.
HONDURAS: A. C. Hamilton y F. Sheehy, Tela Railroad Co.
JAMAICA: I. Goodbody y W. Page, University of the West Indies; T. H.
Farr, Institute of Jamaica. |
MEXICO: L. Vargas y A. Diaz Najera, Instituto de Salubridad y Enfer-
medades Tropicales; R. W. Dickerman, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana.
NEDERLAND: P. W. Hummelinck, Foundation for Scientific Research in
Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles; J. Bonne-Wepster, Instituut voor Tro-
opische Hygiene en Geographische Pathologie.
NICARAGUA: L. Izquierdo, AID; D. Massi, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana.
PANAMA: P. Galindo V. y A. Quifionez, Gorgas Memorial Laboratory.
PUERTO RICO: I. Fox, School of Tropical Medicine.
TRINIDAD: T. H. G. Aitken y L. Spence, Trinidad Regional Virus Labo-
ratory.
UNITED KINGDOM: P. F. Mattingly, British Museum (Nat. Hist.).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: H. K. Townes, American Entomological
Institute; E. J. Gerberg, Insect Control and Research, Baltimore, Md.; H.
Friedmann, C. L. Hogue y F. S. Truxal, Los Angeles County Museum of Nat-
ural History; R. B. Allen, J. A. Kerr y L.J. da Silva, Pan American Health
Organization; S. J. Carpenter, Sonoma, California; A. Stone, U.S. National
Museum; F. Iltis y R. O. Schuster, University of California, Davis; B. Bar-
tholomew, G. A. Bartholomew, K. Bartholomew, M. Buchanan, E. Fisher,
T. R. Howell, M. Lloyd, M. E. Mathias, C. A. Schroeder, S. R. Telford y
D. Verity, University of California, Los Angeles; F. S. Blanton, University
of Florida; A. Spielman, School of Public Health, Harvard University; L. E.
Rozeboom, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University;
J. K. Jones, University of Kansas; G. F. Edmunds, University of Utah; D. D.
Bonnet, U.S. Public Health Service, Atlanta, Georgia.
VENEZUELA: P. Cova Garcia y L. Guerrero, Direccién de Malariologia
y Saneamiento Ambiental, Maracay; G. H. Bergold y O. M. Suarez, Instituto
Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas, Caracas; I. Ortiz C., Instituto de
Hygiene, Caracas. ?
REFERENCIAS CITADAS
Anduze, Pablo J.
1947. Contribucion al estudio de los vectores de la fiebre amarilla en
Venezuela. Acad. de Cien. Fis. Mat. y Nat., B. 10: 331-373. ,
Belkin, John N.
1961. Unstable tropical mediterranean areas as sites of origin of major
evolutionary changes. Ent. Soc. Amer., B. 7: 164.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Berkeley,
U. Calif. Press. 2 vol.
Belkin, John N. y C. L. Hogue
1959. A review of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Calif. U., P. Ent. 14: 411-458.
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 15
Belkin, John N., C. L. Hogue, P. Galindo, T. H. G. Aitken, R. X. Schick y
W. A. Powder
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). II. Methods for the collec-
tion, rearing and preservation of mosquitoes. Amer. Ent. Inst.,
Contrib. 1 (2): 19-78.
1967. Estudios sobre mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae). Il. Métodos para
coleccionar, criar y preservar mosquitos. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contrib.
1 (2a): 21-89.
Belkin, John N. y W. A. McDonald
1955. A population of Corethrella laneana from Death Valley, with des-
criptions of all stages and discussion of the Corethrellini (Diptera,
Culicidae). South. Calif. Acad. Sci., B. 54: 82-96.
1956. A population of Uranotaenia anhydor from Death Valley, with a des-
cription of all stages and a discussion of the complex (Diptera, Culici-
dae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 49: 105-132.
1957. A new species of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) from treeholes in southern
Arizona and a discussion of the varipalpus complex (Diptera, Culicidae).
Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 50: 179-191.
Bonne, C. y Bonne-Wepster
1925. Mosquitoes of Surinam. . . Roy. Colon. Inst. Amsterdam, Meded.
21. 558 p. (Afd. Trop. Hyg. 13).
Carpenter, Stanley J. y W. J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley, U.
Calif. Press. 360 p.
Cova-Garcia, Pablo
1961. Notas sobre los anofelinos de Venezuela y su identificacion. Ed. 2.
Caracas, Editora Grafos. 212 p.
Dyar, Harison G.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Washington, Carnegie Inst. (P.
387). 616 p.
Fauran, Pierre
1961. Catalogue annoté des Culicidés signalés en Guyane Francaise. Inst.
Pasteur de la Guyane Franc. et de l'Inini (Arch. 22) P. 465 60 p.
Foote, Richard H.
1954. The larvae and pupae of the mosquitos belonging to the Culex subge-
nera Melanoconion and Mochlostyrax. U.S. Dept. Agr., Tech. B. 1091.
126 p.
Forattini, Oswaldo P.
1961. Chaves para identificacio de genero Anopheles Meigen, 1818, da
Regiaio Neotropical (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev. Bras. de Ent. 10: 169-
1962. Entomologia Médica. Sio Paulo, Facul. de Higiene e Satde Publica.
662 p.
Galindo, Pedro, F. S. Blanton y E. L. Peyton
1954. A revision of the Uranotaenia of Panama with notes on other Ameri-
can species of the genus (Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann.
aye 1074477.
Hill, Rolla. Bioy C. McD. Bill
1948. The mosquitoes of Jamaica. Inst. Jamaica, B. (Sci. Ser.) 4. 60 p.
Howard, Leland O., H. G. Dyar y F. Knab
1912-1917. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West In-
dies. Washington, Carnegie Inst. (P. 159). 4 vol. Vol. 1 (1913); Vol. 2
(1913); Vol. 3, 1915; Vol. 4, 2917. :
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
Komp, William H. W.
1936. An annotated list of the mosquitoes found in the vicinity of an endemic
focus of yellow fever in the Republic of Colombia. Ent. Soc. Wash.,
Proe. 38:19 t= 10.
1942. The anopheline mosquitoes of the Caribbean Rigion. Nat. Inst.
Health, B. 179. 194 p.
Kumm, Henry W., W. H. W. Komp y H. Ruiz
1940. The mosquitoes of Costa Rica. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 20: 385-422.
Kumm, H. W. y H. Zufiiga
1942. The mosquitoes of Salvador. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 22: 399-415.
van der Kuyp, Edwin
1954. Mosquitoes of the Netherlands Antilles and their hygienic impor-
tance. Studies Fauna Curacao Caribbean Islands 5: 37-114.
Lane, John
1953. Neotropical Culicidae. Sao Paulo, Univ. SAo Paulo. 2 vol.
McDonald, William A.
1957a. The adults and immature stages of Aedes muelleri Dyar (Diptera:
Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 50: 50: 505-511.
1957b. The adults and immature stages of Aedes purpureipes Aitken (Dip-
tera: Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 50: 529-535.
McDonald, William A. y J. N. Belkin
1961. Orthopodomyia kummi new to the United States (Diptera, Culicidae).
Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 62: 249-250.
Martini, Eric C. W.
1935. Los mosquitoes de México. México, Dept. de Salubr. Publica. 65 p.
Patifio-Camargo, L.
1940. Artrodpodos hematofagos de la fauna colombiana. Acad. Colombiana
de Cien. Exact. Fis. y Nat., Rev. 3: 337-344.
Pérez Vigueras, I.
1956. Los Ixodidos y Culicidos de Cuba, su historia natural y médica.
Havana. 579 p.
Rozeboom, Lloyd E. y W. H. W. Komp
1950. A review of the species of Culex of the subgenus Melanoconion (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 43: 75-114.
Simmons, James 8S. y T. H. G. Aitken
1942. The anopheline mosquitoes of the northern half of the Western Hemi-
sphere and of the Philippine Islands (Distribution, habits, identification,
importance as vectors, and control). Army Med. B. 59. 213 p.
Stone, Alan
1961. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement I.
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 63: 29-52.
1963. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement II.
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 65: 117-140.
Stone, Alan, K. L. Knight y H. Starcke
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, ‘Gaeta’
Washington, Ent. Soc. Amer. (Thomas Say Found. P. 6). 358 p.
Tulloch, George S.
1937. The mosquitoes of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico, U., J. Agr. 21: 137-167.
Vargas, Luis
1956. Especies y distribuci6n de mosquitoes Mexicanos no anofelinos (In-
secta Diptera). Inst. de Salubr. y Enferm. Trop., Rev. 16: 19-36.
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América 17
1959. Lista de Anopheles de las Américas y su identificacion por carac-
teres masculinos (Diptera: Culicidae). Inst. Salubr. y Enferm. Trop.,
Rev. 19: 367-386.
Vargas, Luis y A. Martinez Palacios
1956. Anofelinos mexicanos. Taxonomia y Distribucion. Mexico, Sec. de
Salubr. y Asistencia. 181 p.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
ne z a
oyed{ew
sodsedeyey
T-S961-.LN3-100Z-VI1ON
SHTIN ALNLVIS
000T 008 009 007 002
VolWswWV JAIGCIW
@
erica
Am
Mapa de Meso
Fig. 1.
Belkin et al: Proyecto sobre Mosquitos de Meso-América
ETIQUETAS DE LOCALIDAD
ARG
Argentina 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BAH
Bahamas 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BAR
Barbados 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BG 65
British Guiana 66
Mosq Mid Amer
BGR
British Guiana
LE Rozeboom leg
BH
Br Honduras 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BOL
Bolivia 64-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BRA
Brasil 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
BRR
Brasil
LE Rozeboom leg
CH
Chile 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
COB
Colombia 64-65
INSP, Bogota, OM
COE
Colombia 64-65
SEM, MSP, Elliott
COL
Colombia 64-65
Univ~ Valle Cali
equinus
Theobald 62
MosqMidAmer &
panarchys
Dyar G5
MosqMidAmer o
soperi
Levi-Castillo 65
MosqMidAmer &
tropicalis
Cerq & Ant 65
MosqMidAmer o
albomaculatus
Theobald GS
MosqMidAmer &
CR
Costa Rica 1964
Charles L. Hogue
CRR
Costa Rica
LE Rozeboom leg
CUB
Cuba ‘
Mosq Mid Amer
CY
Villavicencio,Col
Rozeboom 47-48
CZ
Canal Zone 63/64
W.P.Murdoch, leg
DOM
Dominica 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
ECU
Ecuador 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
FG
Fr Guiana 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
FGA
French Guiana
E Abonnenc leg
FWI 64
Fr West Indies 65
Mosq Mid Amer
GAL
Galapagos 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
GG
Panama '58
Gorgas Mem Lab
No, (CR)
Costa Rica
XI, 7-XII, 11, 62
Hogue & Powder
GG
Panama '58
Gorgas M_ Lab
GR
Grenada 1963
£ e H. G, Aitken
GRR
Grenada
LE Rozeboom leg
GUA
Guatemala 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
HAC
Haiti (Cook)
LE Rozeboom leg
HAR
Haiti
LE Rozeboom leg
HAT
Haiti 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
HON
Honduras 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
JA
Jamaica 64/65
William A, Page
KO
W. H, W. Komp
LAR
Lesser Antilles 29
LE Rozeboom leg
LEE
Leeward I 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
Panama
leg. Carpenter
LU
St Lucia 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
MEX
Mexico 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
MF
Mexico 63/64
Eric M. Fisher
MT
Mexico 1963
S. R. Telford
MX
Mexico
NI
Nicaragua 1964
Gorgas Mem Lab
NIR
Nicaragua
LE Rozeboom leg
NWI 65
Neth West Indies
Mosq Mid Amer
PA
Panama '63
Gorgas M_ Lab
PA
Panama 63/64
Gorgas Mem Lab
PAR
Panama/CanZone
Rozeboom 34-37
PC
Panama/CanZone
S. J. Carpenter
Panama, Army
School Malar.
R H Arnett
Lot
ETIQUETAS DE IDENTIFICACION
albonotatus
Coquillett GS
MosqMidAmer o
allotecnon
K,. KS Ruiz G5
MosqMidAmer &
arborealis G65
Bon-We & Bonne
MosqMidAmer o
argyrites 65
Dyar & Nun Tov
MosqMidAmer &
aurivittatus
Cerqueira 6S
MosqMidAmer o
andinus
Levi-Castillo GS
MosqMidAmer J
asulleptus si
Theobald 49
MosqMidAmer o
durhamii
Theobald 65
MosqMidAmer J
flavisetosus
Castro
MosqMidAmer o
guayasi
Levi-Castillo 65
MosqMidAmer &
chidesteri
Dyar
MosqMidAmer o
corniger
Theobald oS
MosqMidAmer &
coronator
Dyar & Knab 65
MosqMidAmer o
declarator
Dyar & Knab 69
MosqMidAmer
delys
HD&K 65
MosqMidAmer o
PER
Peru 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
PR
Puerto Rico 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
RDO 65
DominicanRep 66
Mosq Mid Amer
ROZ
LE Rozeboom leg
SAL
El Salvador 64-65
Mosq Mid Amer
SUR
Surinam 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
TOB
Tobago 65
Mosq Mid Amer
TR
Trinidad 63/64
T. H. G, Aitken
TRR
Trinidad 1941
L. E. Rozeboom
VI
Virgin Islands 65
Mosq Mid Amer
VT
St. Vincent 1963
T. H. G. Aitken
VZ
Venezuela 65-66
Mosq Mid Amer
VZR
Venezuela 64-65
LE Rozeboom leg
cancer
Theobald GS
MosqMidAmer &
mcdonaldi 65
Belkin & Hogue
MosqMidAmer o
melanophylum
Dyar & Knab 65
MosqMidAmer Jo
annulipalpis G5
Lynch Arribalz
UCLA-ZOOL oo
apicimacula
Dyar & Knab 65
UCEA-ZOOL oo
Fig. 2. Etiquetas de Localidad e Identificacién
en Vr
fs sy *
& i
ee . Theat
3 Lait
a
e
bicent vet||
i
Age: \ gad eentdyanh, Fl
|
iodine ER,
Cae iy ; et2eths.
aad BEY! Sughd
en ee ee
oe
Bese SN BB ABR
Pa DORAL: BE
é
:
Rian esebee
ane ae
Su Sim Sil a gna?
lal
ee)
ee ee ee ee
ESTUDIOS SOBRE MOSQUITOS (Diptera, Culicidae)
Ila. METODOS PARA COLECCIONAR, CRIAR Y PRESERVAR mosquitos?
Por
John N. Bele. Charles L. Hoes’. Pedro Gaudio.
Thomas H. Aitken’, Robert X. Seek y William A. Dowden”,
Traduccion de
Ernesto Osorno-Mega”. Fenita de Ossrne!
Felipe J. Masta y Abdiel J. Adamea®
: Esta investigacion fué sostenida en parte por U.S. Public Health Service,
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Donacion para Investiga-
cidn AI-04379); en parte por U. S. Army Medical Research and Development
Command, Department of the Army (Contrato de Investigacion DA-49-193-MD-
2478) y en parte por U.S. National Science Foundation (Donacion para Investi-
gacion G-18961 y GB-2270). Parte de los estudios de campo fueron hechos en
conexion con el U. S. Public Health Service Donacion de Entrenamiento TI-AI-
ton.
* Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Califor-
nia 90024, U.S.A.
eee Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 900 Exposition Blvd. ,
Los Angeles, California 90007, U.S.A.
* Gonos Memorial Laboratory, Apartado 6991, Panama, Republica de
Panama.
> Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory, P. O. Box 164, Port of Spain,
- Trinidad.
Cinsiaae Nacional de Salud, Seccion de Entomologia, Calle 57, No. 8-35,
Bogota, D.E., Colombia.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
CONTENIDO
ROC Ge CIO io ante es ae a ute a rg. bait aor he 24
Registro decColeoticn 7 FeO. ARGOS 200 eS 24
Pe eta Ce OC ONE Cera vets won pals dv eamsby a dale airs 24
Cédigo y Numero de Coleccion (Lote). ...... 25
Localidad e Informaciones Relativas ....... 20
Aimbiente General. oie Gre bees Une eh Se a eK 26
Bstagios JUVENMOS Mo OK a ese ew ee eg 27
Peta i au ae at ene Br ae a igteat a urea eek ai
OSCE CIGHCS hn dis cau ai poop BY apy de ae es iy wh ce 27
S116) ed re aI nar mera gaa eae ere Pe 27
Cringe Micisidles ti a ke We ee 28
Poulain ee a lk Ge ee kw 8 28
Librowde Campos & .. 2aoNeosscals aieadaun. ... 29
ColeccionimieladuliGsiain wv Ciisel, J. Sellyt 2... 30
ue ea iP isc awe a a ek eae ee 30
COA et a See eh a wesc a Gee aes Sgel od’ ow! al om Ay 30
Diuerte sy Almacenaie 2.66606 6 6 ee ee ee es 30
Aislamtentos pera Pesturas 9. 2. oo. ee ee 31
Caopmina y ReGIstTO. 20. ki y ee Re ee 31
Coleccion de. Estadios Juveniles .......4"°: s+ 34
Batipessesd laniight eae a oA ae Laie gan cts 34
OU V RC OPSIN Ou. ec cy yc eee sages ek eae 34
Coleccion de Huevos y Material Seco....... 35
Manipulacion y Transporte de las Colecciones . . 36
Ce Bae lad ee ks a
Altura del Criadero sobre el Suelo ........ 20
MOTO. etka lip aiiey Woe Pind.) Bale 510)
Vecctacion en los Criaderds (". 0 ee 50
“MCG 8 WR ete Sa eee Sul i a a o1
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar
SELCOC ION G Bilayer clay tory anhectdent devadi wus. tates) oan Webbe cs bz
Pachidades Yona uioe ee ee. ele ee, 52
Tratamiento de las Colecciones y Seleccion .. . 52
Lavado de los RECIPICMCS HE ee PES 56
Orcanizacion-del LawordtoriOns sua c0enqracwr> p 56
Cras Ma sivas UV Care RO es ane oer ree 57
Crias dnd vidialesan side wrnagaist ealicielvadaes veh.” 58
Frasquitos para Citar arvana ee cee o9
Recipientes para la Emergencia de Adultos. . . . 59
Envases y Jaulas para el Mantenimiento ..... 60
de Adultos
Cria. Ce PrO@eniess nisl suet id box cis os eeeil sees 61
Incubadion de Hueves "9 P9082 A OP RP Geo", BS. Pe 64
Tratamiento del Material Seco .......... 65
CridssE specialest Ven OGaise Aree Pat Pore: 65
Muerte. 2 ReOSer v2 C10 Upt nass sp cl verenbe shire ahd 66
Fouipo y: Ulile sie Ls ee ia res eee eee 66
Adultos Coleccionados enel Campo........ 66
Aduitos: 6n ALCOHOL Ao F Gat Lee oe tae 67
AQUILOS OMigGOS., «mise can cca dence med tis 34: ops clindiner es Aas 67
Teayvas’ y: PUA 2) eee a ME ae totem es 69
WIGS sen or cu ance son burrs wary betula tars sari bic aa gunlouwpmera eal omraniebls 70
Cridsiincompléetasi ere). Vee he ee 71
PIE VOSS. Te capo 2 te eaieciel eorureenan as Ua cagaliumeacan als otf 12
Embalaje, Almacenaje y Transporte......... 13
Pl ACO MNS ao” 5 une uh ctedin ies oe as ate hash ale a oe 73
Embalaje-y Despache™ 7 ar: oa eer eos Ve 73
Esaquema. de los, Procedimj CAS. i; diay & jdnaee Whloeech oem 74
Glosariot 0 Wy oS Ry A OR ae Re. 8 ee Sa ea 76
PRELQT Ct aS Oe i st ssa cepacia, eee cage ak 86
23
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
INTRODUCCION
El objetivo principal de este trabajo es el proporcionar métodos uniformes
para coleccionar, preservar y criar material para el proyecto ''Mosquitos de
Meso-América" (Belkin, Schick et al 1965, 1967). Sin embargo, los mismos
son suficientemente generales y por lo tanto aplicables, en estudios similares
en otras areas. No se ha tratado de presentar una revision exhaustiva, ni tam-
poco una discusion del sinnumero de técnicas que han sido usadas con éxito,
por numerosos investigadores, en varios problemas especificos. Se ha dado
énfasis a los métodos apropiados para la obtencion de material pertinente para
estudios taxonomicos de caracter general; para lo cual es esencial disponer,
en abundancia, de material uniformemente preparado, que contenga todos los
estadios para cada individuo, informacion general de la bionomia y de factores
ambientales sobresalientes y, muestras provenientes de tantos habitats como
sea posible dentro de una amplia zona geografica. Se han tomado importantes
consideraciones en la seleccion de los métodos y técnicas adoptadas, teniendo
en cuenta, la sencillez y conveniencia.de las mismas para su uso bajo las con-
diciones de campo y de laboratorio e igualmente para la uniformacion de los
rotulos y registros, para con ello disminuir errores y ahorrar tiempo. De
igual manera, se ha necesitado un gran esfuerzo y mucha experimentacion en |
el desarrollo de las técnicas y registros adoptados en este proyecto. Una gran
variedad de equipos, formas y métodos han sido sometidos a prueba durante
varios anos en Meso-Ameérica, los Estados Unidos, las islas del Pacifico del
Sur y Nueva Zelandia, antes de lograr las recomendaciones que se exponen en
el presente trabajo. Especial atencion se ha dado al uso de equipo y suminis-
tros livianos y compactos, por su conveniencia para el transporte aéreo, pero
al mismo tiempo, lo suficientemente resistentes para soportar una manipula-
cion ruda. Solicitamos disculpas al laboratorista experimentado y al investi-
gador de campo, por la presentacion y descripcion tan detallada de muchos
procedimientos elementales, pero la experiencia nos indica, que la mayoria de
ellos no son entendidos o interpretados correctamente incluso por técnicos
entrenados, dando como resultado la pérdida de mucho material de estimable
valor.
Queremos expresar nuestro agradecimiento a las siguientes personas por
sus multiples sugerencias y/o por haber ensayado el equipo y los métodos en
el campo: E. Osorno-Mesa, D. Forsyth, P. F. Mattingly, A. Quifonez, S.
Ramalingam, D. Schroeder, S. Sirivanakarn y J. y T. Zavortink.
REGISTROS DE COLECCION
TARJETA DE COLECCION. Se ha disefado una tarjeta de coleccion uni-
forme, para el registro de todos los datos pertinentes a cada coleccion en el
trabajo de campo en Meso-Ameérica; sin embargo, el uso de la misma es apli-
cable pa:a trabajos similares en cualquier parte del mundo. El anverso de la
tarjeta es para el registro de toda la informacion concerniente a la propia co-
leccion y el reverso, para el registro de las crias individuales.
Las anotaciones deben hacerse en el campo hasta el maximo que las posi-
bilidades lo permitan; las partes que resten por llenar, deben ser completadas
en el laboratorio. Los registros deben hacerse con un lapiz blando (No. 2,
2.5 o su equivalente). Todas las medidas deben expresarse en el sistema mét-
rico decimal, en caso de que no se uSaren medidas de ese sistema, tales como
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 29
millas, pies, pulgadas, entonces la abreviacion para el sistema métrico (m),
que esta impresa en la tarjeta debe ser tachada e indicar claramente la unidad
de medida usada. Las anotaciones en la tarjeta requieren un minimo de escri-
tura, pues en la misma esta impresa toda la informacion necesaria, de tal ma-
nera, que solo se requiere subrayaro marcar con un circulo ocon un signo
apropiado, la palabra o frase pertinente en el lugar correspondiente.
Siendo la intencion de la tarjeta, el servir de guia en la seleccidn de los
lugares y métodos para la coleccidn de adultos y estadios juveniles en el cam-
po, es por ello, que la misma es discutida en detalle en los siguientes para-
grafos y en los dos capitulos posteriores.
CODIGO Y NUMERO DE COLECCION (LOTE). Las colecciones se identi-
fican primero (1), por un codigo de dos 0 mas letras maytsculas, las cuales
designan el pais, el grupo colector o la instituciédn (se emplean dos 0 mas cédi-
gos para un pais cuando dos o mas equipos operan simultaneamente en lugares
distintos) y segundo (2), por un numero de coleccion o de lote. Las colecciones
de cada codigo, se enumeraran siguiendo el orden natural de los nimeros, par-
tiendo desde el primero, y cada numero, identificara todo el material de la
coleccion. Para identificar grupos o individuos dentro de una coleccion deter-
minada, se les subdividira en sublotes, a los cuales se les asignara un nimero
que sigue al de coleccion y del cual lo separa un guidn (véase SUBLOTES Y
CRIAS INDIVIDUALES).
La tarjeta de coleccion, servira tanto para las colecciones de estadios ju-
veniles, como para las colecciones de adultos. En caso de que una coleccion
contenga formas adultas y juveniles, estos deben ser separados y usar una tar-
jeta de coleccion para cada una, y por lo tanto, nimeros de coleccion distintos.
Sin embargo, debe indicarse en OBSERVACIONES, que las dos colecciones fue-
ron hechas en la misma localidad. La secuencia numérica de los lotes o colec-
ciones de cada codigo debe continuarse independientemente de se la coleccion
es de adultos o estadios juveniles.
Ein el caso de estadios juveniles debe asignarse un numero de coleccion
para cada criadero, por ejemplo, un pozo en el suelo, un sitio particular en un
pantano o charca, una cueva de cangrejo, un hueco en un arbol, una bromelia,
un recipiente cualquiera, etc. Solamente en aquellos casos, cuando en dos o
mas criaderos idénticos se encuentra la misma especie, debe hacerse una sola
tarjeta de coleccion indicando tal circunstancia en OBSERVACIONES. Las co-
lecciones hechas en axilas de hojas o en inflorecencias individuales de una mis-
ma planta, deben numerarse separadamente si se sospecha que hay varias es-
pecies, y anotar las diferencias entre los habitats respectivos.
En el caso de los adultos, debe asignarse un numero de coleccion distinto
para cada coleccion en un sitio especifico, y para cada tipo de coleccion, por
ejemplo, picando 0 posandose, en un sitio particular de un bosque a una hora
determinada, o, igualmente si es de trampa, de cueva de cangrejo, de una al-
cantarilla, etc. Una colecci6n compuesta o mixta debe explicarse en OBSER-
VACIONES. A las colecciones de adultos para la obtencidn de progenies, debe
asignarsele un numero distinto al de cualquier coleccidn general de adultos
hecha en el mismo tiempo y lugar.
LOCALIDAD E INFORMACIONES RELATIVAS. En localidad debe anotarse
la situacion geografica precisa del drea donde se colecciona, de modo, que se
pueda encontrar facilmente en el futuro. Es recomendable hacer referencia a
la distancia que hay entre elsitio decoleccion y cualquier otro punto facilmente
localizable, como por ejemplo, la carretera principal, posteadura de la misma,
aldea, etc.; en todo caso, las anotaciones deben ser lo mas claras y precisas
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
posibles. Si se cuenta con mapas, debe indicarse en el mismo, el sitio de colec-
cidn con el numero de lote correspondiente. Como por regla general se hacen
varias colecciones en una misma localidad, se hace necesario especificar con
mayor detalle, la localizacién exacta de cada una. Como Se indico antes, debe
anotarse la ciudad, pueblo o caserio mas cercano que aparezca en el mapa, dar
la distancia (km) y la direccion u orientacidn (azimut) con respecto a la misma.
El distrito (parroquia, municipio, etc.) y la provincia (departamento, inten-
dencia, estado, u otras divisiones politico-territoriales mayores), deben es-
cribirse en cada tarjeta, asi como también la fecha y nombre (s) del colector
(es). La altura sobre el nivel del mar del sitio de coleccion, puede obtenerse
por medio de un altimetro o de un mapa acotado. Siempre que sea posible, de-
ben tomarse fotografias del ambiente general y de los habitats especificos, es-
pecialmente de aquellos que se forman en estructuras particulares de las plan-
tas donde se almacena agua. Las fotografias deben identificarse con el numero
de coleccion respectivo, y, para que el mismo salga en la foto, éste se escribe
con un lapiz de cera sobre una tarjeta o cartulina blanca y se coloca en un sitio
apropiado en el lugar que se va a fotografiar. La fotografia de un ambiente ge-
neral sirve para varias colecciones y se debe indicar con una marca (v), en la
tarjeta de coleccion, si se tomo.
AMBIENTE GENERAL. Para cada coleccion, ya sea de estadios juveniles
o de adultos, todos los renglones previstos en esta seccion de la tarjeta, deben
considerarse muy cuidadosamente y encerrar en un circulo, la palabra o frase
correspondiente, en los numerales uno a siete, y cuando sea posible, en el ocho,
nueve y diez. Cualquiera otra informacion pertinente debe registrarse en OB-
SERVACIONES.
1. Plantas lefiosas. Se incluyen en esta categoria arboles, arbustos, ma-
torrales, bejucos y formas arborecentes como el bambu; se excluyen las
epifitas lehosas (véase 3). La escala de altura es de 0 a 30 metros; la altura
de plantas lefiosas se indica encerrando en un circulo los numeros que se
aproximen al rango. En la escala de densidad, el 0 representa total ausencia de
plantas lefiosas; el 1 baja densidad, como por ejemplo, los arboles de un par-
que; el 2 densidad media, como en una planada o llano cubierto de arboles, pero
en donde se puede caminar facilmente; el 3 alta densidad, como en una selva o
bosque en donde no se puede entrar sin antes abrir una trocha o brecha. la
densidad se indica encerrando en un circulo el numero o los numeros apropia-
dos, tomando en cuenta las condiciones intermedias de densidad.
2. Hierbas y pastos. Se incluyen en esta categoria todas las plantas no
lehosas, y comprende también formas como platanos o bananos, heliconias y
bromelias terrestres. Son excluidas formas arborecentes como el bambut, asi
como también las epifitas (véase 1 y 3 respectivamente). La escala de alturas
y la de densidad, deben registrarse en el misma forma y con el mismo criterio
que para las plantas lenosas.
3. Epifitas. Ciertas epifitas son un elemento importante en el ambiente
general de los mosquitos en los tropicos, ya que por virtud de su estructura,
son capaces de mantener y almacenar agua a veces en cantidad considerable.
Muchas especies de bromelias estan en esta categoria. En la escala de densi-
dad, 0 representa ausencia total; 1, baja densidad, es decir, unas pocas plan-
tas por arbol; 2, densidad media, numerosas plantas por drbol y 3, alta densi-
dad, como cuando las plantas cubren casi todo el espacio disponible en un arbol.
4. Areas marginales. Algunos de los ambientes mas propicios para mos-
quitos se encuentran en las formaciones vegetales marginales, a las orillas de
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 27
senderos, caminos, diques, canales, etc. El area marginal de una formacion
vegetal puede identificarse por la presencia de muy diferentes tipos y especies
de plantas, y, la misma puede extenderse algunos metros hacia dentro del mar-
gen propiamente dicho.
0. Areas riberenas. La mayor densidad de criaderos de mosquitos se en-
cuentra enlas riberas de cuerpos y cursos de agua, permanentes o temporales.
El término areas riberefias, lo usamos aqui en un sentido amplio e incluye el
cintur6n o faja de vegetacion que rodea un curso o cuerpo de agua cualquiera.
6. Influencia humana. Contrariamente a lo que se cree, los ambientes
imperturbados no son los mas apropiados para mosquitos, excepto, aquellos a
lo largo de las areas marginales y riberefias. La actividad del hombre es un
factor muy importante en la ampliacion de estas Ultimas. Vegetacion virgen,
se considera aqui a aquella que no ha sido afectada por el hombre o los ani-
males domésticos. Claro, (tala, roza, etc.) se refiere a un area talada en don-
de ha crecido una vegetacion secundaria. Zona de pastoreo, se refiere a areas
perturbadas por la accion de los animales domésticos. Plantio, (plantaci6n,
siembra, etc.) se refiere, 0 es, un area parcial o totalmente talada y sembrada
con cultivos permanentes. Cultivo, se refiere a areas parcialmente taladas y
con cultivos no permanentes. Ambiente doméstico, es un area urbana o rural
en la que moran conjuntamente, humanos y animales domésticos.
7. Luz. La cantidad de luz en el ambiente general de los sitios de colec-
cion, es un factor importante y debe registrarse, en los términos generales
indicados.
8. Precipitacion pluvial. Indiquese en centimetros, la precipitacién media
anual del sitio de coleccion, si hay datos fidedignos alrespecto. En caso de no
ser ello posible, deben tomarse los datos de la localidad mas proxima, y el
nombre de la misma debe ser anotada en OBSERVACIONES.
9. Estacion lluviosa. Subrayense los meses de mayor precipitaci6n pluvial
en la localidad donde se colecciona.
10. Formacion vegetal. Debe anotarse la formacién vegetal dominante en
elarea. Para la que cubre el proyecto 'Mosquitos de Meso-América" estas
formaciones son: selva pluvial tropical, selva pluvial subtropical, bosque
tropical deciduo, selva nublada, paramo, monte espinoso, maleza zona desér-
tica, estepa, sabana, chaparral, bosques de pifio (pinyon-juniper woodland y
pine barrens), bosques deciduos de zona templada, bosque montafioso de coni-
feras, litoral (manglares, marismas). El sistema de Holdridge (1947) puede
usarse alternativamente.
ESTADIOS JUVENILES. Esta seccion se discute y se explica mas adelante
en el capitulo COLECCION DE ESTADIOS JUVENILES. En cada tarjeta de co-
leccion se registrara solamente un criadero, para lo cual se encierra en un
circulo o se llena la descripci6n apropiada del sitio y condiciones del criadero;
por ejemplo, altura del criadero sobre el suelo, agua, vegetacion en el cria-
dero y fondo del criadero.
ADULTOS. Esta seccion se discute y explica mas adelante en el capitulo
COLECCION DE ADULTOS. Para cada coleccidn se anotara el sitio exacto de
colecciOn, asi como los datos relativos al tipo de coleccién, subrayando el im-
preso apropiado: altura sobre el suelo, hospedador o cebo y hora de captura
(especiffquese el tipo de luz usado en la trampa y, otros tipos de trampas).
| OBSERVACIONES. Aqui se registraran notas especiales, explicaciones o
aclaraciones de datos anotados en otras partes de la tarjeta.
SUBLOTES. Esta seccion se usa para registrar las subdivisiones del ma-
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
terial de una colecciOn. En el caso de una coleccién de estadios juveniles los
numeros de sublotes (-1 a -9) se usan para indicar las diferentes especies
reconocidas en la coleccion, y para anotar para estas especies, el material
coleccionado que ha sido preservado directamente, o el obtenido de crias
masivas o de conjunto. Igualmente, los sublotes deben usarse para identificar
las diferentes especies en las colecciones de adultos, asi como para identificar
las crias que se obtienen de adultos coleccionados. En este ultimo caso se le
debe asignar un numero de sublote a cada progenitora y su progenie. La pro-
genitora debe identificarse con la letra mayuscula P, después del numero del
sublote (ejemplo -1P).
Para cada sublote se debe anotar la identificacion provisional (aunque solo
sea el género) y sefialar con una marca (V) la casilla apropiada, asf: L, si lo
que preserva es la larva; 1, sies la muda; P, si es la pupa; p, sies la muda;
o", si es macho; ¢, sies hembra y H, si son huevos. El material pertenecien-
te a un sublote determinado se rotula con el ntmero de colecci6én (lote) se-
guido por un guion (-) y después el numero de sublote; por ejemplo, 50-1 y
50-2 para sublotes -1 y -2 de la coleccion 50.
En la tarjeta se contempla espacio paraun total de nueve especies (o nueve
series) en una coleccién. Si se obtienen mas de nueve especies de un solo
criadero o en una coleccion de adultos, se debe llenar otra tarjeta con los
mismos datos y asignarle otro numero de coleccion, preferiblemente el que
sigue. En cada caso se deben hacer las observaciones pertinentes en ambas
tarjetas.
CRIAS INDIVIDUALES. El reverso de la tarjeta es para registrar crias
individuales de los estadios juveniles colectados en el campo, o de las crias de
progenies. Los numeros se refieren a cada espécimen; de cada uno se indicara
con una marca (V) los estadios que se preservan: muda de la larva (1), la de la
pupa (p) y el correspondiente macho (0) o hembra (?). Cualquier estadio que se
pierda se sefiala con un cero. Si el material preservado en alcohol es una lar-
va O pupa muerta, o un adulto ahogado, se marcara una cruz (+) en la casilla
correspondiente, o con una (V), en la columna 'p', si se trata de un adulto que
emergio parcialmente y una cruz (+) en la columna de & 0 , de acuerdo con el
sexo del espécimen. El nombre especifico (o génerico) correspondiente no
es neceSario escribirlo para entonces.
La serie de tres digitos (-100 a -114) se usa para registrar las crias indi-
viduales provenientes de pupas silvestres, las que, no es practico clasificar
hasta especie. Las series de dos digitos es para registrar las crias individua-
les de larvas en el cuarto estadio, coleccionadas en el campo, o para crias
masivas de progenies. Las series -10 a -19 para especies o progenitoras del
sublote -1; la serie -20 a -29 para especies o progenitoras del sublote -2; la
serie -30 a -39 para especies o progenitoras del sublote -3; y asi sucesivamen-
te hasta las series -90 a -98.
En el caso de que se quieran hacer mas de 10 crias individuales para una
o mas especies, pueden entonces emplearse las series no usadas, teniendo el
cuidado de anotar, en la columna correspondiente a especies, que se trata de
la continuacion de una serie particular. Lo mismo se hace cuando se desea
criar individualmente mas de 15 pupas de las coleccionadas en el campo, en
cuyo caso, las series para larvas pueden emplearse para este fin y preferible-
mente las 90, 80, 70, etc. :
ROTULACION. Todo el material se identifica por medio de numeros, los
cuales hacen referencia al de coleccion 0 lote consignado en la tarjeta y el de
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 29
sublote y divisiones individuales, cuando las hay. ha tarjeta contiene todos los
datos de una coleccion y el registro de todos los nimeros correspondientes a la
misma; por lo tanto, en el campo, no es necesario escribir en las etiquetas o
rotulos el pafs y el cédigo correspondiente al equipo; sin embargo, ello debe
indicarse claramente al momento de hacer el envio del material. Las etiquetas
o rotulos con el cédigo impreso, se deben fijar a todo material en el laboratorio
en el cual se procesa y monta el mismo, para el presente proyecto ''Mosquitos
de Meso-América" el laboratorio central esta en UCLA (Belkin, Schick et al
1965, 1967, fig. 2).
Todos los rétulos deben hacerse con papel ''bond" fuerte (20 lb) y usando
lapiz suave (No. 2, 2.5 0 equivalente), nunca tinta.
En el caso de colecciones que no se dividen en sublotes, se escribira en la
etiqueta solamente el numero de coleccion (lote) precedido del signo o subra-
yandolo, en el caso de que la lectura del mismo pueda prestarse a confusion.
Si la coleccién se divide en sublotes, en la etiqueta se escribe el numero de
coleccion (lote) seguido de un guidn (-) y luego el numero de sublote; ej., 50-1,
50-2, etc., (véase la seccién SUBLOTES). la etiqueta o rotulo debe colocarse
siempre dentro delenvase que contiene el material, nunca por fuera del mismo.
En la rotulacion de crias individuales deben usarse etiquetas especiales
impresas, con lo cual se ahorra tiempo, se reducen a un minimo los errores
mecanicos y se asegura uniformidad. Estos rotulos estan distribuidos en
columnas en una hoja, las cuales se cortan en el sentido de las columnas,
resultando asi tiras de etiquetas. Todas aquellas tiras con los mismos numeros
se agrupan y cada grupo se guarda en un sobre. Los numeros en estas etiquetas
corresponden a los que estan en el reverso de la tarjeta de coleccion para
identificar las crfas individuales. Los de la serie 100, estan repetidos una vez
(uno es para la muda de la pupa y el otro para el adulto correspondiente); los
de las series 10, 20, 30, etc., hasta la 90, estan repetidos tres veces (uno para
la muda de la larva, otro para la de la pupa y el otro para el adulto correspon-
diente).
Para marcar las crias individuales en una colecci6n determinada se pro-
cede de la manera siguiente; (1) preparese una tira completa de la serie apro-
piada y escriba en ella el numero de coleccién (lote) enfrente del guidn (-);
luego, (2) corte una serie de un mismo numero, comenzando por la parte su-
perior de la tira, segun se vaya necesitando; (3) la serie se fija al recipiente
con la crfa individual, aprisionandola entre la tapa y los bordes del envase; (4)
corte una etiqueta de la serie de numeros repetidos, para marcar la muda y los
adultos tan pronto como estos se colocan en los frasquitos o carpulas para
conservarlos; durante la crianza siempre debe haber una etiqueta individual
con una serie repetida acompafiando cada estadio hasta que, el mismo Sea pre-
servado; (5) la secciOn no usada de la tira se guarda con la correspondiente
tarjeta de la coleccién o sublote de cria masiva hasta que estas se terminen,
entonces se destruye lo que quede de la tira de etiquetas; (6) marque apropiada-
mente en el reverso de la tarjeta de coleccién, todos los numeros de las crias
individuales, a medida que los mismos son asignados.
LIBRO DE CAMPO. Siempre se debe usar un libro de campo para anotar
detalladamente toda la informacion para la cual no se ha previsto espacio en la
tarjeta de coleccion. Debe tenerse el cuidado de anotar el numero de coleccion
-a la correspondiente informacion registrada en el libro de campo. Una libreta
de campo de las usadas por los ingenieros es la mas apropiada, pues de una
vez se obtienen duplicados que se pueden anexar a la tarjeta de coleccion,
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
evitando asi el tener que copiar de nuevo la informacion original. Las libretas
deben guardarse para mantener un registro permanente del trabajo de campo.
COLECCION DE ADULTOS
EQUIPO. El equipo basico para la captura de adultos consiste en: (1) as-
piradores, (2) mallas o redes de entomologia, (3) recipientes para postura,
(4) tubos y frascos para matar mosquitos, (5) frasquitos y tazas plasticas con
sus tapas y papel toalla e higiénico, (6) cajitas plasticas, (7) linternas de pilas
y (8) un morral de coleccio6n debidamente equipado, como se indica en el
GLOSARIO. Cuando sea posible, se deben también usar trampas de varias
clases: de luz, con cebo animal y trampas aéreas (véase mas adelante).
CAPTURA. Los mosquitos pueden capturarse, mientras estan volando, con
una red de nylon de malla fina. El apice de la red se sostiene hacia arriba con
el aro y el mango hacia abajo y se deja que los mosquitos entren hasta el fondo;
luego se introduce el tubo para matar y se pone la boca del mismo sobre cada
individuo. Si se capturan muchos especimenes al mismo tiempo con esta téc-
nica, puede haber una perdida o dafio considerable de los mismos. En estos
casos, lo mejor es tratar que todos los mosquitos pasen al fondo de la red, lo
cual se logra moviéndola rapidamente de un lado a otro varias veces, y enton-
ces, rapidamente se recoje la red de tal forma que quede una bolsa con los mos-
quitos dentro, la cual se introduce en el frasco para matarlos y se cierra, de
tal manera que la red quede dentro del frasco.
Si los mosquitos estan reposando, se les captura con un aspirador y luego
se les transfiere al tubo para matarlos. Es siempre preferible capturar mos-
quitos con un aspirador, pero esto no es practico cuando hay una gran cantidad
de ellos.
Es también posible colocar la boca del tubo directamente sobre el mosquito
reposando o picando, pero con esta técnica se requiere el uso de varios tubos a
la vez, y continuamente, y por consiguiente, hay que estarlos cargando con
cloroformo o acetato de etilo muy seguidamente.
MUERTE Y ALMACENAJE. Los tubos de ensayos preparados con cloro-
formo son muy efectivos para matar mosquitos, pero pueden usarse otras sus-
tancias (véase GLOSARIO). Estos tubos deben usarse exclusivamente, para
matar mosquitos y deben contener tiras de papel higiénico ('kleenex' o papel
toalla), las cuales deben reemplazarse apenas comiencen a humedecerse.
Los especimenes deben sacarse de los tubos o frascos con cloroformo u
otro agente activo, dentro de los 10 minutos siguientes a su introducciOon en
ellos. El contenido de estos tubos se debe vaciar en un frasquito o taza plas-
tica (depende de la cantidad de material) con papel higiénico o de toalla en el
fondo y luego se le cubre con una capa adecuada del mismo papel. Para cada
coleccion se debe usar un frasquito 0 taza plastica y en las paredes del mismo
debe escribirse, con lapiz graso, el numero de colecciOn. También debe
ponerse dentro del recipiente un rotulo con el numero de coleccidn escrito con
lapiz. Una pequefia porcidn del papel que contiene los especimenes se puede
humedecer para estos que se mantengan blandos y relajados. El envase debe
mantenerse tapado todo el tiempo. La operacion de poner los especimenes en
las cajitas plasticas, es mejor no realizarla en el campo, sino hacerla al final
del dia en al laboratorio o en el campamento (véase el capitulo sobre MUERTE
Y PRESERVACION).
Belkin et al: Meétodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar ol
AISLAMIENTO PARA POSTURAS. Los adultos de varias especies de
mosquitos son muy comunes, pero sus larvas y pupas raras veces se les
encuentra, e incluso, los estadios juveniles y sitios de cria de ellos, ain no se
conocen. Esto es particularmente cierto con especies de los géneros Aedes
y Psorophora de Meso-América. Para obtener los estadios juveniles de estas
especies es necesario aislar hembras vivas coleccionadas en el campo, indu-
cirlas a poner, y asi obtener todos los estadios (véase CRIA DE PROGENIES
en el capitulo SELECCION-Y CRIA). Es también deseable, estudiar el grado
de variacio6n en clones de las especies importantes. Usando la técnica
mencionada se obtiene el material necesario para ello.
Las hembras gravidas o llenas de sangre, que se encuentran en el campo,
deben aislarse en recipientes individuales para postura; las que estén picando,
deben capturarse en recipientes para postura, después que éstas se hayan
llenado completamente, de sangre. El algodon dentro del frasquito para pos-
tura debe estar saturado de agua, y el frasquito mantenido ala sombra. Del
mismo modo, debe taparsele apropiadamente y marcarlo por fuera con un 1a-
piz graso con el numero de coleccion.
CAPTURA Y REGISTRO. Los mosquitos deben colectarse donde quiera que
ellos se encuentren, pero atencion especial debe prestarsele a las areas mar-
ginales y riberefias y a las afectadas por las actividades humanas, discutidas
en el capitulo precedente. Toda la informacion para cada colecciodn debe ano-
tarse en la tarjeta de coleccién, empezando por la localidad e informacion
general, tal como se indico en el capitulo anterior. Generalmente, se hacen
varias colecciones en una misma localidad y a cada debe asignarsele un nume-
ro de coleccion distinto de acuerdo al sitio especifico, a la altura sobre el suelo,
a un hospedador o cebo especifico, a la hora determinada de captura (véase
mas adelante). En el caso de que se hagan colecciones mixtas, debido a con-
diciones excepcionales, esta circunstancia debe explicarse en la seccion OB-
SERVACIONES. A una coleccién de adultos para obtener cria, se le debe
asignar un numero de coleccion distinto a cualquier otra coleccién hecha al
mismo tiempo y en el mismo sitio.
Anote en la seccion AMBIENTE GENERAL los datos pertinentes para
cada coleccién, como Sse indico en el capitulo precedente. Después anote para
cada apartado en la seccidn ADULTOS, como se indica mas adelante. Estas
dos secciones sirven como guia para la seleccion de los sitios y métodos para
coleccionar adultos en los ambientes mas propicios. Condiciones especiales
tales como, lluvias, tempestades, etc., deben anotarse en OBSERVACIONES.
1. Sitio. Debe anotarse la situacion exacta, no el ambiente general, y,
registrar detalles tales como, el tamafio de la cueva de cangrejo, el tipo de
plataforma en un arbol, condiciones del cebo u hospedador, etc.
2. Tipo. El tipo de captura se indica subrayando o encerrando en un cir-
culo solamente uno de los itemes en la lista impresa en la tarjeta. Las cap-
turas mas comunes son: picando o posandose obtenidas por el colector o asis-
tente que sirve como cebo; sin embargo, no siempre es posible distinguir entre
ambas, y por lo tanto, son consideradas como del mismo tipo. Para estas
capturas, dos hombres pueden trabajar en una area; en todo caso, uno que
sirva como cebo mientras el otro captura los mosquitos que se posen o traten
de picar al primero. El resultado de la captura es mayor cuando se exponen
la piel de los brazos y piernas del colector. Colecciones excelentes se pueden
también obtener con un colector que trabaje solo. Diferentes especies de ani-
males se pueden usar como cebo. Para capturar los mosquitos en estos casos,
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
se usa un aspirador y se debe permanecer en un mismo Sitio, por lomenos unos
treinta minutos. Si los mosquitos son muy numerosos es neceSario usar una
red y frascos de boca ancha para su captura. Las redes son muy ttiles en el
caso de muchos sabetinos, que por lo general, se espantan muy facilmente.
Enjambres de mosquitos, compuestos principalmente por machos, se en-
cuentran algunas veces sobre arbustos u objetos sobresalientes, incluso la ca-
beza del colector. Tales enjambres deben capturarse con una redecilla y en su
totalidad, si ello es posible. Las condiciones del lugar deben anotarse en la
tarjeta de coleccion.
Las capturas de mosquitos reposando, se hacen en una gran cantidad de
habitats, en donde éstos se concentran normalmente durante los periodos en
que estan inactivos. Casi siempre cualquier sitio protegido, fresco y som-
brio, sirve como lugar de reposo, sin embargo los lugares mas productivos
para las capturas de mosquitos en reposo son: troncos de arboles, huecos en
los troncos de arboles, cuevas de cangrejos y de otros animales, debajo de ar-
boles caidos, bancos de arroyos sombreados, zanjas y cunetas (especialmente
si tienen vegetacion colgante y si hay filtraciones), orillas de cascadas, follaje
espeso, mogotes, axilas foliares, bracteas y ascidias, grietas himedas en los
troncos de los arboles, asi como debajo de ciertas estructuras como puentes,
alcantarillas, drenajes, tubos, barriles, cajones, botellas, envases de lata,
establos, sanitarios y sotanos. Entre los mosquitos que estan reposando se
encuentran la mayor cantidad de machos y también hembras gravidas y llenas.
de sangre. Debe buscarse cuidadosamente en todos los lugares posibles en
donde los mosquitos pueden reposar, y enlos sitios muy oScuros Se puede usar
una linterna. A veces, es necesario disturbar el lugar para localizar los
mosquitos. Los mosquitos en reposo se capturan muy facilmente con
un aspirador, directamente con los recipientes para postura o con una
red. En cuevas de cangrejos o de otros animales, o cavidades similares
en el suelo, se les puede coleccionar colocando una red en la boca de
la cueva y hurgando ésta, con un palo oconel aspirador. Para sacar los
ejemplares de la red, se utiliza el aspirador o el frasco de boca ancha, tal
como se indico anteriormente. El lugar exacto donde se realizo la captura de
mosquitos en reposo, debe ser anotado en la tarjeta de coleccion. Toda captura
obtenida en un lugar diferente debe darsele un numero de coleccidn separado.
Las capturas, barriendo la vegetacion, son esencialmente capturas masi-
vas de mosquitos que se encuentran reposando en una zona amplia de vege-
tacion herbacea, pastos o arbustos. Estas capturas se hacen con una red o
malla especial que se pasa rapidamente por encima de la vegetacion, después
que los mosquitos han sido espantados moviendo la vegetacion. Por lo general,
una captura de esta clase esta compuesta de especimenes recién nacidos de
ambos sexos. Los machos de muchas especies se obtienen mas facilmente en
esta forma, antes de que se dispersen 0 mueran. Las areas mas productivas
para colectas de mosquitos barriendo la vegetaciOn, en la forma descrita, es-
tan a lo largo de las margenes de arroyos, pozos y marismas, asi como en el
interior de pantanos y ciénegas, y también, en la vecindad de pozos temporales
en campo abierto o en zonas boscosas. Cuando la red Se pasa sobre la vege-
tacion, esta debe rozarla ligeramente, evitando que se humedezca y que solo
un pequefio numero de ejemplares se capturen cada vez. Para matar los mos-
quitos se emplea el frasco de boca ancha (véase anteriormente). Cuando se
capturan pocos ejemplares se usa el aspirador para sacar los mosquitos de la
red y luego se les transfiere al tubo para matarlos. Una trampa o jaula de ma-
lla fina es Util para coleccionar los mosquitos que reposan sobre el pasto
(Zuleta, 1950).
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 33
El término capturas con luz, se refiere a colecciones hechas durante la
noche con una fuente artificial de luz de cualquier clase. Una gran variedad de
especies nocturnas, y aun diurnas, son atraidas por la luz, incluyendo a menu-
do, un gran porcentaje de machos que dificilmente se obtienen por otros mé-
todos. Todos los tipos de luz eléctrica, incandescentes, flourescente y ultra
violeta son eficaces para atraer mosquitos. Las de longitud de onda mas larga
en el amarillo y anaranjado, son una excepcion. Debe ensayarse hacer colec-
ciones con varias fuentes luminosas estacionarias, en habitaciones, casas ais-
ladas y a lo largo de caminos y carreteras. Los mosquitos se buscan sobre
superficies horizontales o verticales cercanas a la fuente de luz, y tambien, a
distancias considerables de la misma. Algunos pueden encontrarseles volando
enfrente de la luz. Fuentes portatiles de luz (con baterias, lamparas de gaso-
lina o kKerosenes) pueden llevarse al campo y colocarlas delante de una sabana
o lona blanca verticalmente extendida y colgando, por encima de otra colocada
horizontalmente. Los mosquitos se capturan con el aspirador, excepto en los
casos en que son muy numerosos, cuando es mas practico usar una red. Nume-
rosos tipos y clases de trampas de luz se han disenado y usado en muchas par-
tes del mundo, principalmente en las zonas templadas del hemisferio norte.
Las trampas de luz, en general y por razones desconocidas, no han dado resul-
tados muy satisfactorios en muchas areas tropicales. Se debe por lo tanto, in-
tentar disefiar lamparas apropiadas para estas areas, porque ellas pueden ser
utiles para coleccionar especies crepuSculares y nocturnas. No todas las
trampas de luz son apropiadas para capturar mosquitos para estudios taxono-
micos, porque los ejemplares quedan en pesimas condiciones, como sucede con
la trampa ''New Jersey'' y sus modificaciones (Mulhern, 1953). La que poten-
cialmente se adapta mejor para estos fines es la ''CDC miniature" con baterias
y con la cual se capturan especimenes vivos (Sudia y Chamberlain, 1962). Las
colecciones hechas a la luz, estan muy influenciadas por las condiciones at-
mosféricas y por la luna; por lo tanto, es importante hacer para cada coleccion,
una anotacion de las condiciones exactas prevalecientes cuando se hace la mis-
ma, asi como del tipo de luz y trampa usada. A cada coleccion diferente debe
darsele un numero, también diferente.
Capturas con trampas hace referencia a colecciones hechas con todo tipo
de trampas, excepto las de luz. Se han disefiado muchas con cebo animal, pero
las mas utiles para capturar mosquitos en el tropico son la trampa Shannon
(Shannon, 1939, Forattini, 1962: 603-607), la trampa ''Madrugada" (Shannon,
1943, Earle, 1949), la trampa Magoon (Magoon, 1935, Bates, 1944, Russell,
et al, 1963: 298) y la trampa Trinidad nimero 10 (Worth y Jonkers, 1962). Las
capturas que se hacen con algunas de estas trampas, consisten principalmente,
de hembras llenas de sangre las cuales no Sirven para conservarlas como es-
pecimenes para museo, pero son muy importantes para obtener crias. Una
muestra de estas hembras se les separa, y cada individuo se pone en un fras-
quito para postura. El resto de la colecciOn se mata y se preserva. Otras
trampas impiden que la hembra se alimente del cebo, y por lo tanto son mas
convenientes para obtener ejemplares para museo. Trampas con "hielo seco”
(COo) como cebo, se han usado satisfactoriamente en algunas areas, pero no
son practicas para su uso en el campo, en muchos sitios del tropico. Recien-
temente, la trampa portatil Malaise (Malaise, 1937: 148-160, Gressitt y
Gressitt, 1962, Townes, 1963) se ha usado con éxito para diferentes tipos de
insectos voladores, y es particularmente eficiente para la captura de Dipteros.
Esta ultima debe ensayarse y tratar de adaptarla para capturar mosquitos diurnos
y nocturnos. Cuando se usan trampas, la seleccion del sitio es muy importante y
la informacion, junto con la indicacion relativa a la clase o tipo de trampa usada.
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
3. Altura del sitio sobre el suelo. La altura sobre el suelo del sitio de cap-
tura debe ser indicada en todas las colecciones. Las que se hagan de mosquitos
picando o posando y las hechas batiendo o barriendo la vegetacion con la red,
cuando el colector esta sobre el suelo, se consideran efectuadas a 0 metros.
En cualquier otro caso, la altura debe estipularse. Para las capturas de mos-
quitos con trampas, en enjambres o posando, debe especificarse la altura a la
que se encontraban los especimenes.
4. Hospedador 0 cebo. Debe indicarse el numero y tipo de hospedador y
cebo usado en las capturas.
5. Hora de captura. El periodo de duracion de la captura debe ser indica-
do, es decir, la hora exacta del periodo de captura, usando preferiblemente el
sistema de las 24 horas corridas (de 1 a 24). El tiempo de operacion de la
trampa debe ser indicado de la misma manera.
COLECCION DE ESTADIOS JUVENILES
EQUIPO. El equipo basico y utiles necesarios para la captura de estadios
juveniles es: (1) cucharones, (2) redes para coleccionar en el agua, (3) bomba
para mosquitos y sifones, (4) pipetas y goteros, (5) bandejas 0 cubetas esmal-
tadas o de plastico, (6) baldes plasticos, (7) tazas plasticas con tapa, (8) fras-
quitos plasticos con tapa, (9) bolsas plasticas, (10) recipiente plastico o jarrafa
plastica para agua, o de cualquier otro tipo paramantener agua limpia y preferi
blemente de lluvia, (11) caja de madera o carton o traillas para colocar los
frasquitos plasticos llenos, y, (12) un morral de coleccion debidamente equipa-
do, como se indica en el GLOSARIO.
CAPTURA Y REGISTRO. En vista de que el gran porcentaje de las espe-
cies puede ser colectado en sus formas juveniles, es por lo tanto neceSsario,
poner énfasis en el reconocimiento taxondmico de los estadios juveniles que se
puedan criar en el laboratorio, y asi determinar una asociacion definitiva en-
tre los adultos de ambos sexos y todos sus estadios.
Los estadios juveniles deben coleccionarse con gran cuidado y mantener-
los con suficiente agua y sedimentos del criadero original, para con ello ase-
gurarles alimento adecuado. Las larvas y pupas se sacan del criadero con un
cucharon, red coladora, pipeta, sifon o bomba. Todas las larvas se deben
coleccionar, incluso las muy pequefias. Todos los estadios juveniles se colo-
can en una bandeja o taza plastica, cubeta o balde, con suficiente agua del cria-
dero hasta que se obtenga el numero de ejemplares deseado. Los residuos
grandes se eliminan y el sedimento, silo hay, se deja asentar. Como la trans-
formacion en pupa y la emergencia de los adultos tiene lugar en las horas in-
termedias de la mafiana y de la tarde, es muy importante, mientras se esta co-
leccionando o transportando el material, aislar en frasquitos individuales el
numero deseado de larvas en el cuarto instar (el cual se distingue porque las
larvas son mas obscuras y opacas) y las pupas de color obscuro. Cada fras-
quito se tapa y se marca por fuera con el numero de coleccion (lote), con lapiz.
geraso. El resto de la coleccion debe ser cuidadosamente examinada para ver :
si hay presente larvas depredadoras y carnivoras, las cuales también deben
Separarse en frasquitos individuales. (Para el reconocimiento de larvas car-
nivoras véase la secci6n sobre CRIAS ESPECIALES en el capitulo SELECCION
Y CRIA). En caso de tener agua en exceso, esta se vacia pasandola a traves
de una red de malla fina; el residuo se devuelve al recipiente, volteando la red y
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 35
sumergiéndola varias veces en el agua para limpiarla. Finalmente, la colec-
cidn debe colocarse en una o mas tazas plasticas llenas con agua hasta los 3/4
de su capacidad y con unas 200 larvas y/o pupas en cada una. Luego todos los
recipientes se tapan cuidadosamente, y ambos recipientes y tapaderas, deben
ser marcados exteriormente con el numero de coleccion, usando lapiz graso.
Es muy importante que todos los utensilios se laven bien después de cada
coleccion, para evitar que pueda mezclarse material de diferentes colecciones.
Es evidente que algunos registros de mosquitos provinientes de criaderos poco
comunes, son debido a mezclas inadvertidas de material por el motivo antes
sefialado.
A cada coleccion de un criadero especifico, debe asignarsele un numero de
coleccion y anotar en la tarjeta toda la informacion correspondiente e indicando
igualmente toda la informacion pertinente para cada uno de los renglones en la
seccion ESTADIOS JUVENILES. Todos los detalles concernientes a esta sec-
cidn se discuten en los capitulos CRIADEROS, ALTURA SOBRE EL SUELO,
AGUA, VEGETACION Y FONDO. Aun cuando se hagan varias colecciones en
una misma localidad, a cada una se le asigna un numero de coleccion diferente
y en cada tarjeta se registra toda la informacion relativa a la localidad y la que
se solicita en AMBIENTE GENERAL.
En la seccion sobre CRIADEROS se da una lista de los principales sitios
utilizados como tales por los mosquitos y sirve como una guia para buscar en
el campo, sitios especificos donde encontrar estadios juveniles.
COLECCION DE HUEVOS Y MATERIAL SECO. Una buena fuente, fre-
cuentemente relegada, de material de mosquitos son los huevos depositados en
el habitat natural. Para ciertas especies, particularmente de los géneros Aedes
y Psorophora, este material es el mejor para obtener larvas, pupas y adultos,
especialmente durante la época seca; por consiguiente, debe hacerse lo posible
por coleccionar huevos en el campo e incubarlos en el laboratorio. Ademas, es
muy deseable obtener informacion referente a los huevos de mosquito, pues
hasta ahora, muy poco se conoce, especialmente de los huevos de especies que
se crian en las axilas foliares y bracteas florales. Es aconsejable preservar
algunos de estos huevos (véase el capitulo sobre MUERTE Y PRESERVACION).
Aquellas especies que utilizan agua permanente 0 Semipermanente en el
suelo, generalmente ponen los huevos sobre la superficie del agua, pero en
ocasiones se les encuentran adheridos a la vegetacion. En el primer caso, los
huevos son generalmente coleccionados con las larvas y pupas, si Se usa una
red de profundidad para filtrar el aguay los residuos del criadero. Los huevos
obtenidos en esta forma deben ser incluidos en la misma coleccion, junto con
las larvas y las pupas. Sin embargo, debe hacerse un esfuerzo especial para
localizar masas de huevos o huevos individuales de anofélinos y aislarlos en
frasquitos individuales para incubarlos. Estos huevos se pueden sacar del agua
por medio de una tira de papel de filtro u otro papel absorbente. Ciertas
especies de Mansonia pegan masas, rosetas o cintas de huevos a la vegetacion
acuatica, emergente o flotante o a varios objetos, a rds o por debajo de la
superficie del agua, y algunas veces, a las raices de las plantas (véase Horsfall,
1955, para sitios especificos). En donde quiera que se coleccionen adultos de
Mansonia, debe buscarse huevos en los cuerpos de agua permanente de los al-
rededores. Las masas de huevos deben tomarse junto con un pedazo de la ve-
getacion a la cual estan adheridos y llevarselas al laboratorio, para su incu-
bacion.
Las especies que utilizan principalmente aguas temporales en el suelo como
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
criadero (Psorophora y varios subgéneros de Aedes), generalmente, ponen los
huevos individualmente en tierra humeda por encima del nivel del agua o en de-
presiones Sin agua pero que eventualmente pueden ser inundadas. El desarro-
llo larvario de estas especies es por lo comutn bastante rapido y generalmente
los estadios juveniles de las mismas no es posible hallarlos cuando solamente
se encuentran hembras en el campo. En estos casos, debe intentarse colec-
cionar al margen de las depresiones en donde haya habido agua. Se deben ob-
tener muestras de suelo hasta una profundidad de una pulgada, utilizando para
ello una espatula u otro instrumento apropiado; dichas muestras se colocan en
bolsas o tazas plasticas para ser inundadas con agua posteriormente (véase el
capitulo referente a SELECCION Y CRIA). También pueden coleccionarse
huevos de estas especies en areas semejantes durante el periodo de la esta-
cidn seca, especialmente cuando los adultos se han observado durante la es-
tacion lluviosa precedente. Todas las areas inundables debe revisarse, asi
como las margenes de cuerpos de agua permanente 0 semipermanente, sujetos
a fluctuaciones periodicas del nivel del agua. La presencia de huevos en el
suelo puede comprobarse en el campo, poniendo una muestra de suelo en agua;
si hay huevos, las larvas nacen por lo general, alos pocos minutos. Diferen-
tes especies ponen sus huevos a distintos niveles en la pendiente del pozo o
concavidad en el suelo; por tal motivo, deben recogerse muestras de suelo
a varios niveles.
Muchas de las especies que se crian en los huecos en los arboles y posi-
blemente otros habitats en plantas (axilas de hojas, bracteas florales, cascar-
as de coco, bambus, etc.), ponen los huevos por encima del nivel del agua.
Los huevos de algunas de estas especies soportan la desecaciOn y pueden per-
manecer viables después de largos periodos de sequia. Después de coleccionar
larvas y pupas en tales habitats, las paredes del hueco o de la estructura donde
se acumula el agua deben enjuagarse varias veces con agua limpia para despe-
gar los huevos que puedan estar presentes. En la coleccion en estos criaderos
debe también incluirse una considerable cantidad de residuos del fondo, para
ver si hay huevos en los mismos. Durante la estacion seca, se pueden locali-
zar huecos en los arboles, los cuales sirven como criaderos en tiempo de llu-
via. Residuos del fondo y el raspado de las paredes en tales sitios debe colec-
cionarse en bolsas o tazas plasticas, para su posterior tratamiento en el labora-
torio. Residuos secos del fondo de las hojas basales de agabe o fique u otras
plantas similares, han suministrado huevos de especies de Aedes y es posible,
que material seco de las axilas de las hojas o de las bracteas de estas plantas
puedan albergar huevos viables de mosquito.
Las colecciones de huevos se someten al mismo tratamiento que las de los
estadios juveniles, dandole un numero de coleccion para cada sitio especifico
y anotando la informacion en la secci6n ESTADIOS JUVENILES. La naturale-
za de la coleccion se anota en OBSERVACIONES.
MANIPULACION Y TRANSPORTE DE LAS COLECCIONES. Los diferen-
tes recipientes que contienen los estadios juveniles o adultos colectados en el
campo, deben colocarse verticalmente en cajas o cajetas para su transporte.
Generalmente, poca mortalidad se registra cuando se toman las precauciones
debidas durante el transporte del material en vehiculos apropiados para operar
en el campo. Las precauciones que se deben tomar son las siguientes: Primero,
los recipientes deben ser colocados en donde el sol no les de directamente, ni
donde el calor sea excesivo. Si la temperatura ambiente es muy alta, se deben
poner toallas humedas encima y alrededor de los recipientes. Segundo, se debe
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar od
manejar con cuidado, evitando altas velocidades, frenadas repentinas, saltos y
baches. Tercero, periddicamente (cada hora mas o menos) se deben hacer
paradas de unos 10 a 15 minutos para revisar las colecciones. Los frasquitos
deben destaparse para liberar la presiOn que pueda haber dentro de ellos y
luego taparlos nuevamente. Esta operacion es particularmente importante,
cuando se cambia de altitud rapidamente, en cuyo caso es conveniente revisar
las colecciones con mayor frecuencia. Cuarto, si en el trayecto hay emergen-
cia de adultos, estos deben Separarse de inmediato, en frasquitos individuales.
Varios métodos especiales se han usado para transportar larvas y pupas,
pero si se toman las precauciones antes anotadas, los mismos no son indis-
pensables. Se han transportado colecciones en vehiculos para pasajeros, en
viajes que han tomado mas de una semana, transitando malas carreteras y sin
emplear métodos especiales, y la perdida de material ha sido practicamente
nula.
CRIADEROS. La lista de criaderos que aparece en la tarjeta de coleccion,
proporciona una guia para los principales tipos especificos de habitats, utiliza-
dos por los estadios juveniles de los mosquitos. En cada localidad deben re-
visarse todos los tipos previstos. A cada tipo especifico se le debe asignar un
numero de coleccion separado y la tarjeta de coleccion para cada uno, se debe
llenar como se indico anteriormente en la seccion COLECCION Y REGISTROS.
En esta seccion se definen y discuten los diferentes tipos de criadero, en el or-
den que aparecen en la tarjeta de colecciOn, al mismo tiempo, que se sugieren
métodos especiales de colecciOn que pueden ser mas ventajosos. la lista de
sitios para criaderos comienza con los mas generalizados, situados en el suelo
y prosigue con los mas especializados, encontrados en las plantas. Si se en-
cuentra un criadero no especificado en la tarjeta de coleccion, éste se debe
describir en detalle y con toda la informacion pertinente en la seccion OBSER-
VACIONES.
1. Laguna, lago. Esta categoria comprende todos los cuerpos de agua,
permanentes 0 semipermanentes, naturales o artificiales, con una area libre
de considerable dimension en el centro. Se distingue entre lago y laguna, por el
tamafio. El lago es mas grande, y generalmente lo abastecen uno 0 mas arro-
yos (quebrada, riachuelo, etc.); la laguna es pequefia, y la abastecen manantia-
les o agua de infiltracién. Los lagos, por lo general, estan sefialados en los
mapas, mientras que las lagunas no, y Solo tienen nombres locales. Las co-
lecciones deben hacerse en varios sitios y en tipos diferentes de vegetacion al-
rededor de los cuerpos de aguas mencionados, y, si es posible, en la parte cen-
tral de los mismos. A cada coleccién se debe asigner un numero de coleccion
distinto y anotar en OBSERVACIONES el sitio exacto, ademas de especificar las
diferentes condiciones del agua, la vegetacion y el fondo que se piden en la tar-
jeta. Los estadios juveniles se localizan mas facilmente moviendo la vegeta-
cion y agitando el fondo. Las larvas y pupas que lleguen a la superficie, se
sacan con un cucharon o red coladora. En las orillas abruptas y en donde la
vegetaciOn crece en mogotes o haces, los estadios juveniles se concentran en
el margen de la vegetacion. La captura, en estos casos, se puede hacer sumer-
giendo rapidamente un cucharon, o haciéndolo descender lentamente al mismo
tiempo que se le apoya contra la vegetaciOn. En los sitios despejados se obtie-
nen mejores resultados si se arrastra una red en el agua, de un lado o otro.
La localizacién y captura de los estadios juveniles de las especies mas co-
munes, tipicas y bien conocidas, de los géneros Anopheles, Bironella, Urano-
taenia, Culex, Aedeomyia, Hodgesia, Culiseta, Ficalbia y ocasionalmente Aedes,
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
no ofrece mayores dificultades. La manipulaciOn y técnicas generales de
ellas, han sido expuestas anteriormente, en la seccidn COLECCION Y REGIS-
TROS. la técnica de concentracion con un colador o red, que es particular-
mente importante para obtener estadios juveniles en abundancia, debe usarse
Siempre. Otras formas comunes en lagos y lagunas, sin embargo, requieren
especial atenciOn para reconocerlas, encontrarlas y tratarlas. Estas ultimas
son discutidas en los paragrafos siguientes.
Las larvas y pupas de Mansonia se encuentran debajo de la superficie del
agua pegadas a la vegetacion flotante, o a tallos y raices de plantas que tienden
a sobresalir. Para localizar los criaderos de algunas especies de este género,
se utiliza una red acuatica y mediante una operaciOn rapida se pasa bajo la ve-
getacion; luego el contenido que se obtiene al levantarla se vacia en una bande-
ja o balde con agua. Para otras especies de Mansonia, la técnica consiste en
sumergir un balde y cuidadosamente colocarlo por debajo de la vegetacion flo-
tante y luego levantarlo 0, simplemente, tomar pedazos de la vegetaci6n y po-
nerlos en un recipiente con agua. En todos los casos, la vegetacion que se ha
puesto en el recipiente se agita vigorosamente en el mismo, para que las lar-
vas y pupas se desprendan; luego, Sse examina pedazo por pedazo todo el mate-
rial, incluso los fragmentos que se hayan ido al fondo del recipiente. Al mo-
mento de la emergencia, las pupas de Mansonia flotan en la superficie, yacien-
do horizontalmente, inmoviles, aparentemente sin vida y semejando las pupas
de Chironomidos. Los criaderos de Mansonia pueden encontrarse algunas veces,
buscando las mudas de las pupas. Las larvas y pupas vivas de Mansonia deben
colocarse en frasquitos plasticos individuales y ponerles en su interior, flotan-
do en la superficie del agua, un disco de papel resistente a la humedad (véase
la seccidn CRIAS ESPECIALES en el capitulo SELECCION Y CRIA). Las pupas
con coloracion oscura deben colocarse en frasquitos individuales, sin agua y
con una tira de papel humedo. Los estadios juveniles de algunas especies de
Ficalbia también se adhieren a la vegetacion flotante, y para coleccionarlas se
emplea la misma técnica que para las de Mansonia.
Las larvas y pupas de especies de Chaoborus y Sayomyia se encuentran,
por lo general, a mayor profundidad que las sefialadas arriba en las areas des-
cubiertas, y lejos de la orilla. Para coleccionarlas se arrastra una red gran-
de a varias profundidades, asi como también, sacando material del fondo. El
contenido de la red se vierte en una bandeja con agua, en la que también se lava
la red. Las larvas de estas especies son practicamente transparentes y dificil
de localizar; sin embargo, si se espera que el material en suspension sedimen-
te, se les puede reconocer por los movimientos que efecttan, cuando flotan,
horizontalmente, cerca del fondo de la bandeja. Aun cuando las larvas de espe-
cies de Chaoborus y Sayomyia son carnivoras, se les puede poner juntas en
el mismo recipiente, ya que su dieta no incluye mosquitos.
Las larvas y pupas de especies de Corethrella y Lutzomiops también re-
quieren atencion especial. Ellas son semejantes a las de Anopheles o Urano-
taenia y descansan paralelas a, y ligeramente por debajo de, la superficie del
agua. Algunas son muy excitables, y cuando Se les disturba se sumergen y per-
manecen por largos periodos en el limo floculoso del fondo. la pupa flota in-
movil en la superficie, en posiciOn horizontal y semejando semillas o bracteas
de compuestas. Los especimenes de Corethrella y Lutzomiops no es necesario
aislarlos, pues no parecen ser canibales y probablemente se alimentan de mi-
croorganismos mayores grandes presentes en su habitat.
Los estadios juveniles de especies de Dixinae, se encuentran comtnmente
en la vegetacion alrededor de lagunas y lagos y en otros habitats acuaticos en
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 39
el suelo; pero rara veces se les colecciona debido a que no Se les considera
relacionadas con los verdaderos mosquitos. Las larvas se mueven hacia atras,
con un movimiento ondulante del cuerpo y aparentemente sobre la superficie
del agua; cuando estan en reposo sobre la vegetacion o en la orilla, doblan el
cuerpo en forma de U invertida, de tal manera que la cola y la cabeza estan
sumergidas, mientras que, el resto del cuerpo esta completamente fuera del
agua. Con frecuencia reptan fuera del agua, pero Siempre envueltas en una pe-
licula acuosa. Ellas se pueden desalojar de tales situaciones, vertiendo rapi-
damente agua con un cucharon, o bien rociando con agua la orilla o la vegeta-
cion, para luego coleccionarlas con una red o un cucharon. Las pupas se en-
cuentra junto con las larvas, descansando contra las orillas y con el abdomen
hacia abajo. Después de coleccionadas las especies de Dixinae, se manipulan
como los verdaderos mosquitos.
2. Charco. Se incluyen en esta categoria todos los cuerpos de aguas estan-
cadas que Se encuentran en el suelo, siendo principalmente de naturaleza tem-
poral y debidos a situaciones, bien sean naturales o artificiales. Algunos de
estos cuerpos de agua pueden ser semipermanentes, como es el caso de las
cunetas y los pozos que se hacen a lo largo de las carreteras y vias férreas,
para construir el terraplen de las mismas, o de los canales de riego y drenaje.
Los charcos que quedan después que las aguas de inundacion vuelven a su cauce
normal, también estan incluidos en esta categoria. Un charco de gran magni-
tud, se considera aquél que 5 0 mas metros de largo; los de menor dimension
son considerados pequefios. Un tipo comtn en esta categoria son los surcos
formados por los carruajes al transitar por carreteras fangosas. los diferen-
tes tipos de aguas estancadas que se incluyen en esta categoria, deben buscarse
tanto en areas abiertas, como sabanas y pastizales, asi como en las areas de
crecimiento secundario (rastrojos, tales, limpias) en lugares boscosos. Cada
uno de estos ambientes contiene especies diferentes de mosquitos. Una cate-
goria especial, 5. Bosque inundado, se trata aparte, pues en la misma rara-
mente se hacen colecciones, y en ella pueden haber especies de interés muy
especial. Los pocitos que dejan las pisadas de los animales, 3. Huellas de
animales, también estan incluidos en la categoria de charcos.
La coleccion de mosquitos en este tipo de criaderos, se puede hacer con
cucharones, coladores, redes acuaticas, bombas o, directamente con pipetas.
La fauna de mosquitos consiste, principalmente, de especies del genero Aedes
y Psorophora; pero, en los pozos grandes y semipermanentes es posible en-
yomyia, Corethrella, Lutzomiops, Dixinae e incluso Mansonia. Para los cuatro
ultimos grupos se dio una discusion detallada en la seccion 1. Laguna, lago.
3. Huellas de animales. Las huellas de animales en areas bajas y panta-
nosas, abiertas o boScosas, son criaderos apropiados para mosquitos, espe-
cialmente durante la estacidn lluviosa. Los estadios juveniles pueden colec-
cionarse directamente con una pipeta o con un cucharon, colador, bomba o red
coladora. Los dos Ultimos son mas convenientes, ya que con ellos se capturan
los especimenes mas rapidamente, al mismo tiempo, que se obtiene concen-
trado el alimento natural existente en el criadero. Aun cuando la fauna de mos-
quitos en este tipo de criadero, consiste principalmente, de especies que se
crian en cuerpos de agua temporales (Aedes, Psorophora), a veces, también,
incluye especies que normalmente se crian en habitats acuaticos permanentes
(Anopheles, Culex, Uranotaenia, etc.).
4. Pantano 0 ciénega. Esta categoria incluye pantanos, ciénegas y maris-
mas de todo tipo; es decir, areas de suelo hdmedo permanente o semiperma-
40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
nentemente, mas o menos cubiertas uniformemente con aguas estancadas, pero
sin mucha extension de agua libre o abierta. Una gran variedad de tipos espe-
ciales de criaderos se encuentran en los pantanos, y es por lo tanto importante,
que se les revise muy bien, haciendo la coleccion a lo largo de una linea ima-
ginaria desde la orilla hasta el centro. Todos los grupos de especies mencio-
nados en la seccion 1. Laguna, lago estan, por lo general, representados enlos
pantanos frecuentemente por especies particulares de estos habitats. Tal es el
caso de algunos mosquitos que se crian en areas del pantano, en las que la
vegetacion es tan densa que aparentemente no hay agua, pero la cual se hace
evidente cuando uno hunde la vegetacion que cubre la misma. Las areas de es-
te tipo, con vegetacion baja, se encuentran en la periferia de los pantanos y
son las denominadas depresion cenagosa, en la tarjeta de coleccion.
La coleccion en los pantanos es muy dificultosa debido a la densidad de la
vegetacion. A menudo, es necesario cortar con machete la vegetacion alta, a-
partar los troncos que quedan y agitar el agua, antes de poder localizar los es-
tadios juveniles de los mosquitos. Frecuentemente, especies muy particulares
se encuentran en pequefios pozos dentro del pantano mismo y en las orillas de
los mogotes o haces de vegetacion. Los pantanos son particularmente ricos
en especies de Mansonia.
0. Bosque inundado. Los pozos de agua temporal en los bosques, raramen-
te se investigan para buscar material de mosquitos. En las islas Salomon y
Nueva Guinea, las larvas de varias especies muy comunes del género Aedes
no se conocian, hasta que fueron encontradas en este tipo de criadero. Estos
pozos, generalmente, son poco profundos e intermitentes, y aparentemente, al-
gunas especies completan su desarrollo en ellos, en una serie sucesiva de
inundaciones; sobreviviendo en los periodos intermedios, en el barro o cieno
del fondo, en la forma de larva o de pupa. Este tipo de habitat debe investigar-
se lo mas completamente posible, para la localizacién de aquellas especies de
Aedes y Psorophora cuyos estadios juveniles son desconocidos.
6. Infiltracion, manantial. Muchas especies de mosquitos solamente
pueden criarse en habitats formados por aguas corrientes, en las cuales se en-
cuentran las formas siguientes: Dixinae, Anopheles, Bironella, Chagasia,
Uranotaenia, Culex y Culiseta. Los estadios juveniles se coleccionan con pipetas,
cucharones, coladores y redes coladoras, de acuerdo con la profundidad del
agua. Los manantiales dentro de las cuevas, ofrecen un interés particular y
deben por lo tanto, investigarse mas detenidamente de, lo que han sido en el
pasado.
7. Pozo. Estas fuentes artificiales de agua fresca albergan una fauna de
mosquitos m muy similar, a la que se encuentra en los infiltraciones y manantia-
les (véase la secci6én anterior) y en las que, especies del género Chaoborus y
Sayomyia pueden también estar presentes. Los estadios juveniles pueden colec-
cionarse con redes coladoras o incluso con redes acuaticas, ademas de cucha-
rones y coladores. Las paredes de los pozos sirven, a menudo, como sitios de
reposo para los adultos.
8. Arroyos. Comprende corrientes de agua de todo tamano y tipo (rios,
riachuelos, quebradas, etc.) las cuales sirven como sitios de cria para espe-
cies de Disinae, Anopheles, Bironella, Chagasia, Uranotaenia, Culex, Aedeo-
myia a (ocasionalmente), Hodgesia, Culiseta, Ficalbia y algunas veces ee Marconia.
La mayoria de los estadios juveniles se ies encuentra entre la vegetacion o en
las orillas; pero la preferencia de las especies, por lo que se refiere a la velo-
cidad y fuerza de la corriente, es muy variable. Algunas se les encuentra en
las orillas de las piedras en donde la corriente es mas fuerte. Los charcos a
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 41
los lados de la corriente principal olos que van quedando a medida que el arro-
yo se seca, son también muy productivos en material de mosquitos. Los re-
mansos, en donde se acumula gran cantidad de residuos flotantes, constituyen
un sitio especial en el que a menudo, se concentra gran cantidad de estadios
juveniles.
9. Ganja, drenaje. En esta categoria se incluye todo tipo de canal que sir-
va para drenar o llevar agua. Ellos ofrecen un habitat muy similar al que se
encuentra en ciertos tipos de arroyo y albergan una fauna, también similar,
pero mas limitada. Los drenajes pequefios semejan imanantiales, pero estan,
a menudo, contaminados con residuos organicos de procedencia domestica.
10. Fuentes, alcantarillas. Son recipientes en los que se recogen aguas
corrientes y que estan revestidos de concreto, y generalmente, no tienen vege-
tacién. La fauna de mosquitos aunque muy limitada es muy importante y esta
constituida por especies domésticas, semidomésticas y algunas silvestres,
especialmente de los géneros Culex y Anopheles. Los estadios juveniles se
coleccionan con pipetas, cucharones, coladores o redes.
11. Cuevas de cangrejos. Las cuevas que hacen los cangrejos terrestres
(Gecarcinidae) y otras formas relacionadas (Ocypodidae), sirven como lugares
de crfa o de reposo para un gran numero de especies de los géneros Deinoceri-
tes, Culex y Aedes y unas pocas de Uranotaenia. El género Deinocerites y
algunos 10S subgéneros de Aedes del viejo mundo (especialmente Cancraedes,
Geoskusea y Levua) viven exclusivamente en cuevas de cangrejo. Representan-
tes de otros géneros y subgéneros pueden a veces, encontrarse en cuevas de
cangrejo. Algunas de las especies de mosquitos que viven en cuevas de can-
grejo se les encuentra también en los huecos en los arboles, envases artifi-
ciales, y, no sonraras, en charcos temporales, en aquellas areas en donde
existen las cuevas de cangrejos. No parece haber especificidad o asociacion
entre una determinada especie de mosquito y una de cangrejo; sin embargo,
cuevas de diferentes tamafios y en ambientes diferentes, albergan especies dis-
tintas de mosquitos; pero, a menudo, no es raro que dos o mas especies de
mosquitos habiten en una misma cueva. Es claro, por lo expuesto, que las
colecciones de cuevas diferentes deben mantenerse Separadas y darle a cada
una, un numero de colecciOn. Cuevas de cangrejo con mosquitos se han encon-
trado dentro y a lo largo de las riberas de manglares, de arroyos, rios, lagos
y lagunas cerca del mar y en tierra adentro (Lago de Valencia, Venezuela),
como también, en las pendientes de colinas. El agua dentro de las cuevas, es
por lo regular, dulce o ligeramente salobre y no-esta sujeta a las fluctuaciones
de las mareas. la lluvia afecta notablemente la conveniencia de una cueva de
cangrejo para la cria de mosquitos, lo que contribuye, en parte, a las diferen-
cias estacionales en la distribucion de los mosquitos que las habitan. Por con-
siguiente, deben hacerse colecciones durante todas las épocas del afio y en todos
los tipos de cuevas.
Algunas cuevas de cangrejo son poco profundas y los estadios juveniles se
pueden ver facilmente en la superficie del agua. Sin embargo, en la mayoria
de ellas el nivel del agua es variable, pudiendo estar, o bien, a unas pocas
pulgadas o a unos 2 0 mas metros por debajo de la superficie del suelo; es de-
cir, al nivel de la mesa de agua o, aproximadamente al nivel del agua del
pantano, rio o lago mas cercano. Solo en aquellas cuevas, en las cuales hay
adultos, se encontraran estadios juveniles. La presencia de adultos puede de-
terminarse, soplando humo de tabaco o hurgando con un palo o aspirador, o
también, pisoteando fuertemente alrededor de la entrada de la cueva, si la re-
sistencia del suelo asi lo permite. Los adultos regresan a la cueva a los pocos
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
segundos después de haber sido disturbados y, entonces, se les puede capturar
con un aspirador. Si los mosquitos son muy abundantes, lo mas recomendable
es poner una red sobre la boca de la cueva y proceder a disturbarlos, como se
explico anteriormente. A las colecciones de adultos se les asigna, a cada una,
un numero de coleccion, el cual es diferente del que se le asigna a la coleccién
de estadios juveniles hecha en la misma cueva, pero debe procederse a anotar
en la tarjeta de coleccion, cual colecciOn de adultos corresponde a una de juve-
niles y viceversa. |
La manera mas facil para capturar los estadios juveniles es con una bom-
ba o sifon ("mosquito pump"). El extremo del tubo de goma o caucho, de dia-
metro apropiado, fijo a la camara de la bomba, se introduce, cuidadosamente,
en la cueva, hasta que llegue al fondo y, luego, se le levanta un poco para que
al absorber no se tape con el material del fondo de la cueva. La bomba o pera
de caucho, fija al otro extremo de la bomba, se comprime, entonces, repetida-
mente hasta que la camara se llena o hasta que salga toda el agua de la cueva.
La camara de la bomba no debe llenarse mas alla de su capacidad, pues ello,
puede traer como consecuencia que la bomba o pera se tape. Una vez que la
camara esta llena, se saca el tubo de la cueva y se le desconecta de la bomba,
asi como también la pera. Con el contenido de la camara se van llenando, hasta
los 3/4 de su capacidad, las tazas plasticas que se crean necesarias. El resto
del agua se pasa por una red coladora para capturar los estadios juveniles que
queden y para concentrar el alimento y los residuos. la red se invierte y se
enjuaga varias veces en el agua de las tazas plasticas para recoger todo el ma-
terial que contenga. Las cuevas de cangrejo se vuelven a llenar rapidamente
con el agua del suelo y deben bombearse repetidamente, hasta que se colec-
cionen todos los estadios juveniles en ella.
El tamafio de la cueva debe registrarse en la tarjeta de coleccioén. Para
el presente proyecto, se considera una cueva grande, aquella que tenga 5 cen-
timetros (2 pulgadas) o mas de diametro, en la entrada. Enlo posible, debe
determinarse la especie de cangrejo que la habita, asi como registrar cual-
quier informacion con respecto a las condiciones de la cueva.
Otras cuevas o cavidades hechas por animales y que se llenen parcialmen-
te de agua, pueden servir como criaderos de mosquitos, tal como se ha encon-
trado en Australia, para varias especies de Aedes (Marks 1957). Consecuente-
mente, sitioS como estos, que son potencialmente apropiados para criaderos de
mosquitos, deben investigarse y revisarse, con la ayuda de una bomba, como
se ha descrito anteriormente.
12. Huecos en las rocas. Los huecos en rocas de varios tipos y en gran di-
versidad de lugares, constituyen sitios especificos para criaderos de mosquitos
de los géneros Anopheles, Culex, Uranotaenia y especialmente Aedes. Estos
sitios tambien pueden ser utilizados por otras especies de los mismos géneros,
que generalmente se crian en aguas en el suelo, como también por ciertas es-
pecies de Dixinae, Bironella, Culiseta y Haemagogus. Los tipos mas comunes
de estos criaderos estan en muy diversas rocas (sedimentarias, fgneas 0 me-
tamorficas) a lo largo de rios o dentro de los mismos. Tipos similares se
encuentran en las rocas a la orilla del mar, pero estos albergan una fauna dis-
tinta a la de los descritos en primer termino. Los huecos en las rocas volcani-
cas 0 coralinas que se encuentran a menudo, lejos de corrientes de agua o de la
costa, pueden también servir como criaderos para mosquitos. En todos estos
tipos de criaderos, los estadios juveniles se capturan facilmente con una pipeta,
cucharon, colador o una red coladora, de acuerdo con el tamafio de la oquedad
en la roca. Si el hueco es muy estrecho y profundo se puede usar una bomba.
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 43
Como el alimento presente en estos habitats es, frecuentemente, muy limitado,
su contenido debe agitarse bien después de coleccionar los estadios juveniles,
colarlo y afiadirlo a los recipientes con el material vivo, como se describio an-
teriormente. Objetos tales como, hojas, palitos, etc., deben revisarse deteni-
damente antes de desecharlos.
18. Recipientes artificiales. Se incluye en esta categoria cualquier objeto
hecho por el hombre y en.el que se pueda acumular agua; por ejemplo: tanques
de agua, piscinas abandonadas, botes, llantas, latas de conservas o bebidas,
canecas, tazas, floreros, etc. Estos objetos pueden servir como criaderos
para especies que normalmente se crian en huecos en los arboles, bambus, ma-
terial vegetal en el suelo e incluso, para aquellas que se crian en las axilas de
hojas y bracteas florales. Algunas de las especies que se crian en los pozos en
el suelo, pueden también hacerlo en recipientes grandes. Cuando las condicio-
nes son propicias, la poblacion que se desarrolla en estos sitios puede llegar a
ser bastante grande. El material proveniente de cada recipiente se considera
una coleccion diferente, y por lo tanto, debe asignarsele un numero de colec-
cion distinto a cada una. Es importante registrar el tamafio del recipiente (se
considera grande a aquél con capacidad para 10 o mas litros--2 y 1/2 galones--
de agua) asi como las condiciones existentes, tanto dentro, como fuera, del
recipiente. Esta informacion puede servir para localizar el criadero natural
de algunas especies que hasta la fecha solo han sido coleccionadas en recipien-
tes artificiales.
En el caso de recipientes pequefios, la colecciOn se hace vertiendo su con-
tenido, previamente agitado, en un envase plastico. Cuando el contenido de
agua es suficiente, los estadios juveniles pueden concentrarse colando el con-
tenido del recipiente y recogiéndolo en una bandeja. Cuando los recipientes
son muy grandes, se usa una red coladora, coladores o cucharones, pero
teniendo también la precaucion, de recoger algo del alimento y de los desechos
presentes, junto con el agua.
14. Huecos en los arboles. Esta categoria comprende todo tipo de cavidad,
oquedad, grieta, etc., presente en arboles vivos, tanto en las raices, como en
las ramas, tronco, raices aéreas y apoyos. Las cavidades profundas, con una
abertura horizontal muy estrecha, son el tipo mas especifico. La utilizacion
de este tipo de criadero es caracteristica de un gran numero de especies, en-
tre las cuales estan representantes de los géneros: Anopheles, Uranotaenia,
Culex, Culiseta, Ficalbia, Orthopodomyia, Eretmapodites, Armigeres, Hei Heiz-
mannia, Aedes Guanine subgéneros), Haemagogus, Malaya, Maorigoeldia,
Tripteroides, | Trichoprosopon, Wyeomyia, Sabethes, Toxorhynchites y Core-
thrella. Otras especies pueden ocasionalmente utilizar huecos grandes como
criadero. Las oquedades o huecos en los arboles contienen agua temporalmen-
te; sin embargo, en algunos casos, parece que pueden mantenerla durante todo
el afio, incluso en areas con muy poca precipitacion pluvial. En los lugares
donde las epifitas son abundantes, los huecos en los arboles parecen no abundar.
Ello es debido, probablemente, a que las epifitas se implantan en ellos tan pron-
to como aparecen. Es también posible, que solamente estén cubiertos o escon-
didos por las epifitas, en las bifurcaciones de las ramas o en la base de las
mismas. La informacion referente a la especificidad en la asociacion entre
especies de mosquitos y de arboles es muy eScasa; pero es probable, que exis-
ta un alto grado de especificidad, por lo menos para algunas formas, como su-
cede por ejemplo, con el caso del bambt, que por esta razon se describe sepa-
radamente mas adelante.
El numero de especies de plantas que tienen huecos apropiados para cria-
Aa Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
deros, es relativamente bajo, por lo que es necesario dedicar mucho tiempo
buscandoles. Todas las partes del arbol deben examinarse detenidamente.
Algunas de estas oquedades, tienen aberturas muy angostas que se forman don-
de se origina una rama secundaria de una principal, o ésta del tronco. En las
raices, los huecos se localizan frecuentemente, gracias a la mancha que deja
el agua al derramarse de los mismos. la presencia de adultos de especies
conocidas que Se crian en estos sitios, eS indicativo de la existencia de. estos
criaderos en la vecindad.
kl agua contenida en estos criaderos, es a menudo tan oscura, que es di-
ffcil determinar la presencia de estadios juveniles por inspeccion directa del
criadero, 0, incluso, buscando cuidadosamente en el agua, después que la mis-
ma ha sido recogida con una pipeta y vertida en un recipiente. Con el fin de
obtener todo el material de mosquitos, incluyendo los huevos, presentes en
los huecos en los arboles, se sugiere utilizar la técnica siguiente: Sila boca
del hueco eS muy angosta o pequena, esta se ensancha con una navaja hasta
obtener el ancho de la cavidad interior. bas paredes de la oquedad deben ras-
parse por encima del nivel del agua y luego lavarlas; utilizando para ello una
pipeta y agua del mismo criadero.
Si el hueco es muy pequefio, [se le considera pequefio aquel que tiene capa-
cidad para menos de un litro (quart) de agua] se debe usar una pipeta ordinaria
para trasegar todo el agua a un recipiente adecuado; luego, se le vuelve a lle-
nar con agua limpia, se agita y nuevamente se recoje todo el contenido y se le
agrega al obtenido originalmente. El liquido asi obtenido se usa para llenar
una o mas tazas plasticas hasta 3/4 de la capacidad de las mismas. El rema-
nente se pasa a través de una bolsa coladora (''dip net bag"'), para con ello
obtener la concentracion del material sodlido y utilizar luego el liquido sobran-
te para llenar nuevamente el hueco del criadero. Para determinar la presen-
cia de estadios juveniles o para separarlos, el concentrado se vierte en una
bandeja con agua limpia, en la que también se lava el colador o bolsa coladora.
Las ramitas, palitos, hojas, etc., Se sacan, se revisan y Se lavan en la ban-
deja y se desechan. Después de haber hecho una inspeccion completa y dete-
nida del material, el agua y todo el contenido de la bandeja, se cuela nueva-
mente y el concentrado se lava enuna o mas de las tazas plasticas que contienen
parte del agua original del criadero.
Si el hueco es grande (capacidad de mas de un litro), se usa una bomba
para vaciar toda el agua, siguiendo la técnica descrita en la seccion 11. Cuevas
de cangrejos. El resto del procedimiento descrito anteriormente, debe seguirse
para obtener la concentracion del material de la colecciOn, excepto, que el
exceso de agua del primer bombeo, puede ser usado para lavar el hueco e
igualmente para el segundo bombeo. Una vez terminada la coleccion, el ex-
ceso de agua se vierte en el hueco, que se termina de llenar con agua limpia.
A cada coleccion de cada hueco se le debe asignar un numero de coleccion
diferente y hacer las anotaciones pertinentes para cada uno en la tarjeta de co-
lecciOn respectiva. Puede darse el caso, que en un mismo criadero de este tipo,
se coleccione en fechas distintas, sobre todo si Sse encuentran formas poco co-
munes de mosquitos. El nombre comun o cientifico del arbol debe especificar-
se en la tarjeta. |
En una seccion anterior, COLECCION DE HUEVOS Y MATERIAL SECO,
se indicd, que los residuos en los huecos en los arboles se deben coleccionar,
Si existen indicios de que el mismo pudo haber contenido agua.
15. Arboles caidos. Las acumulaciones de agua en las depresiones de los
arboles caidos, son utilizadas como criaderos por una variedad de especies de
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 45
mosquitos. Aparentemente, poca especificidad existe para este tipo de habi-
tat; sin embargo, es necesario obtener una informacion mas precisa sobre el
particular. Especies que se crian en recipientes artificiales y en charcos en
el suelo, han sido encontrados en estos criaderos. Las técnicas que deben se-
guirse para las colecciones en estos criaderos son las mismas que Se usan pa-
ra las colecciones en huecos en los arboles y en los grandes recipientes arti-
ficiales. ;
16. Bambu. La fauna de mosquitos en los bambus, es a nivel genérico,
esencialmente similar a la existente en los huecos en los arboles; pero es
evidente, que hay gran especificidad por bambus para muchas especies, gru-
pos y subgéneros. Junto con el bambu, incluimos otras gramineas arborecen-.
tes llamadas cafias (Phragmites). En general, en una area cualquiera, los
mosquitos que se crian especificamente en bambus, solo se encuentran en bam-
bus que son autoctonos del area. Dos tipos notoriamente diferentes de habi-
tats se encuentran en el bambu: (1) El que se forma en los tallos, caidos o vi-
vos, con rajaduras o quebraduras que permiten que el agua entre y se almace-
ne en los entrenudos. Las especies que se encuentran en este tipo de habitat,
pueden ser las mismas que Se crian en cualquier otro tipo de recipiente o es-
pecies que forman una fauna poco especializada para bambus. (2) El que se
forma en los entrenudos, que presentan pequefias perforaciones hechas princi-
palmente, por insectos y por lo cuales penetra el agua a los entrenudos
(Macdonald 1960: 136-146). Este tipo de habitat alberga una fauna especializa-
da y tnica. Especies de los siguientes géneros utilizan bambits como criade-
ros: Anopheles, Uranotaenia, Culex, Orthopodomyia, Eretmapodites, Armi-
geres, Heizmannia, Aedes (varios subgéneros), Haemagogus, Topomyia,
Tripteroides, Trichoprosopon, Wyeomyia, Limatus, Sabethes, Toxorhynchites,
y Corethrella.
Para coleccionar en el primer tipo de habitat, se puede seguir el mismo
procedimiento descrito en la secciOn 14. Huecos en los arboles. En el segun-
do tipo, el agujero se debe ensanchar de tal manera, que se pueda introducir el
tubo de goma de la bomba 0 aspirador. Otra alternativa, es cortar el tallo por
encima del agujero y asi descubrir el criadero completamente; sin embargo,
tal procedimiento deja el criadero inservible y es preferible, por lo tanto, evi-
tarlo. Criaderos de este tipo deben buscarse en tallos y vastagos de diferen-
tes edades y tamafios, con orificios de entrada de diferente diametro, ya que
parece haber una gran especificidad en la utilizacion de estos sitios por diferen-
tes especies de mosquitos. Ala colecciOn de cada entrenudo, debe asignar-
sele un numero de colecci6n, y anotar, para cada uno, toda la informacion per-
tinente.
Como la localizacion de estos criaderos es bastante dificil, es recomen-
dable taladrar tallos de diferentes edades y tamafio con un berbiqui o brocas
de diferente diametro y obtener asi, criaderos artificiales. Cada una de estos
criaderos debe marcarse con lapiz graso y examinarlos periddicamente.
17. Recipientes de origen animal en el suelo. En la zona tropical del Viejo
Mundo, se han encontrado unas cuantas especies de mosquitos, que utilizan co-
mo criadero el agua acumulada en las conchas de moluscos terrestres, pero
aparentemente, este habitat potencial no ha sido suficientemente estudiado en
el Nuevo Mundo. Otros restos de animales que contengan acumulaciones de
agua también deben examinarse. Siempre que sea posible la identificacién del
animal, el nombre del mismo debe ser incluido en la tarjeta de coleccion.
18. Hojas, frondas y espatas. Hojas de gran tamafio, frondas y espatas
(particularmente palmas), que se encuentran en el suelo y contienen agua, sir-
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
ven de criaderos a un gran numero de especies de los géneros Culex, Urano-
taenia, Zeugnomyia, Armigeres, Aedes (varios subgéneros), Eretmapodites,
Tripteroides, Trichoprosopon y Limatus. Las colecciones de los estadios ju-
veniles que se encuentran en estos criaderos, son facilmente realizables me-
diante el uso de una pipeta, o bien vertiendo todo el contenido en una taza plas-
tica, despues que este haya sido previamente agitado para desprender los
huevos que se puedan encontrar pegados a las paredes por encima del nivel
del agua. Enel caso de frondas espatas mas grandes, el contenido debe pri-
mero concentrarse, filtrandolo con un colador, en la misma forma como se
explico para el caso de criaderos en los huecos en los arboles (véase la sec-
cion respectiva). El contenido de cada criadero de este tipo se trata como una
coleccion separada, tomando nota exacta de la naturaleza del recipiente e in-
dicando la especie de planta, si es posible.
19. Frutos, nueces y cascaras en el suelo. Muchas clases de frutos y nue-
ces con cortezas fibrosas, duras o lefosas, a menudo recogen agua y sirven
como criaderos para especies de los géneros Uranotaenia, Culex, Armigeres,
Aedes (varios subgéneros), Haemagogus, Tripteroides, _ Trichoprosopon,
Wyeomyia y Limatus. Los criaderos mas comunes de este tipo se forman en
las conchas y cortezas de cocos. El agua de estos criaderos debe agitarse y
verterse integramente en tazas plasticas, y es aconsejable, lavarlos con agua
limpia, la cual debe también conservarse. Se debe anotar en la tarjeta de co-
leccion el tipo de criadero de que se trata, asf como también, la condicién del
agua, particularmente con respecto a la cantidad y tipo de materia organica
que contiene.
20. Frutos no caidos. Ocasionalmente el agua se acumula en nueces y
vainas abiertas que permanecen adheridas al arbol. Las bellotas de cacao
roidas por ratas, son conocidas como criaderos de mosquitos en el Pacifico
del Sur y es posible, que casos similares puedan encontrarse en otras partes
del mundo. Como para el caso descrito en el parrafo anterior, el agua de es-
tos criaderos debe agitarse y vaciarse en un recipiente plastico y luego enjua-
garlo bien y juntar el agua del lavado con la originalmente obtenida del cria-
dero. En la tarjeta de coleccion debe especificarse el tipo de fruta y la
naturaleza del contenido de la misma.
21. Axilas de hojas. Muchas especies de plantas monocotiledéneas, herba-
ceas y lefiosas, acumulan gran cantidad de agua por periodos largos en las axi-
las de las hojas y en la base de los peciolos, ofreciendo un tipo de habitat muy
peculiar que alberga una fauna muy numerosa, que contiene representantes de
la mayoria de los géneros, incluyendo Anopheles, Uranotaenia, Culex (varios
subgeneros), Ficalbia, Orthopodomyia, Eret tmapodites, Armigeres, Aedes
(varios subgéneros), Malaya, Topomyia, Tripteroides, Trichoprosopon, . Phoni-
omyia, Wyeomyia, Limatus, Sabethes, Toxorhynchites y Corethrella. Cas Casi
todas las especies que utilizan estos criaderos estan exclusivamente restrin-
gidos a ellos y solamente unas especies pueden usar otros tipos, particular-
mente en lugares como islas pequefias. Asi mismo, algunas especies intro-
ducidas, invaden, ocasionalmente, este tipo de criadero. La asociacion entre
la especie de mosquito y la planta hospedadora, varia considerablemente y,
todavia, no ha sido totalmente determinada. En todo caso, esta asociaciOon es
mas fohima con plantas hospedadoras que segregan sustancias que comunican
al agua una consistencia viscosa.
Cualquier planta que mantenga agua en las axilas debe ser examinada, pues
ellas constituyen un criadero potencial especialmente las plantas de los siguien-
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 47
tes grupos: Espadafias (Typha), pandanaceas (Pandanus, Freycinetia, Sara-
ranga), juncos (Gahnia), palmas (muchos géneros; especialmente plantas jove-
nes y las palmas Nipa y Sago), Araceas (Colocasia, Alocasia, Xanthosoma,
Dieffenbachia, Montrichardia y probablemente, muchas otras plantas que seme-
jan orejas de elefantes y el tard o tiquisque), Bromelias (toda la familia
Bromeliaceae incluyendo la pifia comestible), Liliaceas en un sentido amplio
(Dracaena, Cordyline, Collospermum, Astelia, Sansevieria, Smilax y proba-
blemente otras), Amarilidaceas (Crinum), Musaceas (Musa, Strelitzia, Heli-
conia, Ravenala, Phenakospermum), jengibres (Zingiber, Curcuma), y arru-
rruz (Calathea, Maranta). En general, solo en plantas autoctonas se encuen-
tran especies autoctonas de mosquitos. Las plantas introducidas, como las
de cultivo u ornamentales, generalmente, no albergan mosquitos pero a veces
pueden servir de criaderos a especies introducidas.
La cantidad de agua necesaria para que se puedan criar los mosquitos es a
veces minima. Se han encontrado larvas en axilas de hojas de bananos nati-
vos, en las que solo habia un liquido muy viscoso y musilaginoso. Las larvas
en las axilas de las hojas, por lo regular, se adhieren a la planta; pero tam-
bién, se conoce de especies que reptan de una axilaa otra. Es por esto, que
debe tenerse gran cuidado al hacer colecciones en estos habitats y limpiar muy
bien los utensflios de trabajo, después de cada coleccioén, especialmente las
pipetas, para evitar que haya contaminacion de una coleccio6n con material de
otra. ie
Muy poco se conoce con respecto a la especificidad de los criaderos en
una misma planta hospedadora, pero parece que las condiciones del agua y la
luz, a menudo varian en las diferentes axilas en distintas partes de la planta y,
se ha notado, que las especies presentes en las axilas inferiores pueden ser
distintas a las que viven en la parte superior de la misma planta; por consi-
guiente, debe hacerse, en lo posible, cualquier esfuerzo para mantener sepa-
radas las colecciones de las diferentes axilas de una misma planta. Es im-
portante anotar en la tarjeta de coleccion, la posicion del criadero con respec-
to al suelo, asf como también, si la planta es terrestre o epifita; en este ulti-
mo caso debe anotarse la altura de las axilas con respecto al suelo.
El método para coleccionar en estos criaderos debe adaptarse al tipo de
planta. Las epifitas, como bromelias, deben despegarse y bajarlas cuidadosa-
mente del arbol. Todo el material adherido a la planta se quita cuidadosa-
mente, se lava y se desecha; el agua del lavado se recoge en un balde o bande-
ja. Luego, las hojas se cortan por encima del nivel del agua y se desechan y
el resto de la planta se invierte sobre un balde para recoger el agua que con-
tenga la cual se distribuye en tazas plasticas Mendndolas hasta los 3/4 de su
capacidad. Se procede luego, a deshojar la planta, de afuera hacia adentro
y cada hoja se lava en una bandeja con agua limpia. El agua del criadero y la
del lavado de las hojas se filtra en una red coladora, el concentrado se vierte
en las tazas plasticas, en las cuales, también, se lava la red, para en esta
forma separar los estadios juveniles de los residuos finos.
El mismo procedimiento se emplea con las bromelias terrestres. La
planta se corta a ras del suelo o se le desprende cuidadosamente del mismo.
Si esto no es posible, las hojas se cortan in situ y con una pipeta se saca el
agua de las axilas, la cual se vierte en un recipiente adecuado y de éste se
pasa alas tazas plasticas. Luego, se cortan las hojas centrales, un pedazo
cada vez y se lavan en una bandeja con agua limpia. Esta operacion se continua
hasta alcanzar la base de las hojas. El agua que se va acumulando en las axi-
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
las se va sacando con la pipeta y se vierte junto con la coleccionada original-
mente. Por ultimo, todo el liquido recogido se filtra y se procede como en el
caso anterior. Para coleccionar estadios juveniles en liliaceas epifiticas o
terrestres, asi como en pandanaceas que semejan gramineas, se recomienda
la misma técnica. Un método menos laborioso y con el cual no se destruye la
planta, pero en el cual se pierden muchas larvas, consiste en sacar directa-
mente el agua con una pipeta con pera y verterla en las tazas plasticas; las
axilas se lavan repetidamente con agua limpia, la cual también se recoge.
En el caso de las heliconias, bananeros jovenes y otras musaceas simi-
lares, los pedunculos de las flores, si existen, deben cortarse primero y bus-
car mosquitos en ellas, en la forma como se indica en la seccion siguiente.
Una vez cortado el pedunculo se cortan las hojas por encima del nivel del agua,
en cada axila, comenzando por la hoja mas alta. Los hojas se desechan. Si
se observa agua enlas axilas se saca con una pipeta con pera de goma y se
vierte en una o mas tazas plasticas hasta el nivel usual. Terminada esta ope-
racion, se procede a cortar la planta, por debajo de las axilas mas inferiores
y una vez que todo el suelo alrededor ha sido separado, se le coloca, sin vol-
tearla, en un balde vacio. Se procede entonces, a separar cada hoja, comen-
zando por la base y cada una se lava en una bandeja con agua limpia, al mis-
mo tiempo que se le examina cuidadosamente en busca de estadios juveniles,
que pueden haberse quidado adheridos a sus paredes. Con el agua de las axi-
las que Se acumula en el balde se llenan las tazas plasticas que sean necesarias,
y el resto, una vez que se le quiten los residuos y desperdicios grandes (los
que tambien deben lavarse y examinarse), se filtra con una red coladora jun-
to con el agua que Sse uso para lavar las axilas. El concentrado se vierte en
las tazas plasticas de la manera anteriormente descrita.
En las araceas y palmas es posible coleccionar estadios juveniles sin ne-
cesidad de destruir la planta, para esto el agua presente en las axilas de las
hojas se extrae con una pipeta y se vierte en un recipiente apropiado. Las
axilas deben lavarse varias veces con agua limpia la cual se debe recoger y
colar. Sin embargo, en algunos casos puede que sea necesario usar el méto-
do descrito para las bromelias terrestres.
En las pandanaceas lefiosas, las hojas se cortan, con cuidado, por encima
del nivel del agua en la axila y se procede en la misma forma que para las ara-
ceas y palmas. Los estadios juveniles en lianas de pandanaceas (Freycinetia)
se coleccionan directamente de las axilas foliares con una pipeta; pero debe
lavarse la axila repetidamente con agua limpia, para recobrar todos los espe-
cimenes posibles.
Siempre que sea factible, deben tomarse fotografias de las plantas y anotar
el tamafio y color de las flores, lo cual servira para los efectos de la identifi-
cacion. Asi mismo, es conveniente tomar una muestra de las hojas e inflores-
cencias (frescas o marchitas) para preservarlas como ejemplares de herbario.
El nombre de la planta, si se conoce, se anota en la tarjeta de coleccion.
22. Bracteas y espatas de flores. Las flores o inflorescencias con brac-
teas o espatas grandes, en las que el agua se acumula, sirven de criaderos
para un numero considerable de especies de mosquitos de varios géneros. La
mayoria de las plantas con estos tipos de criadero pertenecen a la familia del
bananero (Strelitzia, Heliconia y Phenakospermum especialmente), jengibres
(Zingiber, Curcuma) y arrurruz (Calathea, Maranta); pero también se conocen
varias pertenecientes a otra familia (Sapria en la familia Rafflesia). Los es-
tadios juveniles se coleccionan cortando la inflorescencia por el pedtnculo y
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 49
recogiendo el agua con una pipeta, la cual se traslada a las tazas plasticas has-
ta el nivel usual. la inflorescencia se coloca luego en una bandeja con agua
limpia y cada parte de la misma se lava cuidadosamente y se descarta. El
agua de la bandeja se filtra después que todo el material solido de gran tama-
fio haya sido removido de la misma. El concentrado asi obtenido es posterior-
mente vertido a las tazas plasticas en la forma ya conocida. Como en las otras
colecciones, al material proveniente de cada inflorescencia se le asigna un
numero diferente, y el nombre de la planta debe ser anotado en la tarjeta. De
ser posible, debe tomarse una fotografia de la misma. Con el proposito de ob-
tener la especifica identificacion de la planta, muestras de inflorescencias
(vivas o muertas), como también de hojas, deben ser coleccionadas y preser-
vadas como ejemplares de herbario. También se deben coleccionar varias
flores inmaduras, preservandolas en frasquitos plasticos que contengan alco-
hol o formalina.
23. Plantas con ascidias. El tipo de criadero mas especializado y particu-
lar, se encuentra en las ascidias de las plantas carnivoras del género Sarrace-
nia (del Nuevo Mundo) y Nepenthes (del Viejo Mundo). En este ultimo género,
se encuentran especies de mosquitos representativos de casi todos los géneros
del Viejo Mundo que utilizan recipientes naturales como habitats y casi todas
ellas, salvo dudosas excepciones, estan restringidas al género Nepenthes.
En el Nuevo Mundo se conocen solo de 2 especies de mosquitos del género
Wyeomyia que viven en Sarracenia (Oriente de Norte América); pero especies
de plantas del género Heliamphora de las tierras altas de la Guayana (Britani-
ca y Venezolana) pueden servir como criaderos para Sabetineos. Plantas con
ascidias, del género Darlingtonia (California y Oregon) y Cephalotus (Suroeste
de Australia) aparentemente no son utilizadas como criaderos; sin embargo,
ello no ha sido suficientemente investigado.
Los estadios juveniles en estos criaderos no se pueden ver facilmente,
pues las larvas permanecen en el fondo de las ascidias. Para coleccionarlos,
las ascidias se desprenden cuidadosamente vertiendo luego su contenido en re-
cipientes apropiados. Posteriormente las ascidias se lavan con agua limpia,
la cual se junta a la obtenida originalmente. Las colecciones de diferentes as-
cidias, deben guardarse separadamente y darles un numero de coleccion dis-
tinto. En la tarjeta de coleccién debe anotarse el tipo de planta y las condi-
ciones del agua. Debe tenerse cuidado de no destruir las colonias de estas
plantas, ya que algunas estan protegidas por ley.
24. Trampas. Los estadios juveniles de algunas de las especies de mos-
quitos que se crian en recipientes, pueden obtenerse en criaderos hechos de
bambt, los cuales se colocan en el suelo o se suspenden a varias alturas, en
sitios apropiados. Especies que son imposible coleccionarlas en otra forma,
pueden obtenerse con esta técnica. Diferentes tipos de trampas hechas de bam-
bu se pueden utilizar para simular criaderos naturales, algunas pueden ser
completamente abiertas, otras con pequefios orificios laterales y otras bien
sea utilizando tallos j6venes de diferentes tamafios, o empleando tallos viejos.
Estos recipientes deben examinarse periddicamente y agregarles agua hasta
el nivel original, para que se desprendan los huevos que se hayan quedado.
adheridos a las paredes. Como se sugirio anteriormente en el aparte 16, se
pueden practicar perforaciones en bambus vivos a objeto de hacer criaderos
artificiales.
Otros tipos de trampas (tales como artesas, baldes o barriles de madera
con agua, colocados en el bosque), también deben ensayarse, en especial du-
50 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
rante la estaciOn seca y en areas donde abundan adultos de las especies que se
desean coleccionar. En la tarjeta de coleccion se debe anotar el tipo de tram-
pa que se usa. las colecciones hechas en trampas individuales, deben mante-
nerse separadas y asignarles a cada una un numero de coleccion distinto.
ALTURA DEL CRIADERO SOBRE EL SUELO. La altura sobre el suelo
debe indicarse en metros para todas las colecciones realizadas en huecos en
los arboles, bambus, arboles caidos, frutas no desprendidas, axilas de hojas,
bracteas florales, epifitas y trampas suspendidas.
AGUA. Deben determinarse las condiciones del agua de cada criadero,
anotando las mismas en la tarjeta de coleccion, bien sea envolviendo en un
circulo las palabras apropiadas, o detallando informaciones adicionales si es
del caso.
1. Permanencia. Criaderos permanentes tienen agua durante todo el ano;
ello puede determinarse por la presencia de verdaderas plantas acuaticas, co-
mo en el caso de criaderos en el suelo. Las cuevas de cangrejo, las plantas
con ascidias y las bromelias grandes, por lo regular, contienen agua perma-
nentemente. Los criaderos semipermanentes tienen agua durante la mayor
parte del afio, pero se Secan a fines del verano y asi permanecen por un mes
o mas. Muchos pantanos y las margenes de lagos y lagunas son semiperma-
nentes; también lo son, huecos grandes en los Arboles y las axilas de las hojas
de bromelias grandes. Los habitats temporales se caracterizan porque solo
mantienen el agua durante un corto tiempo; muchos charcos temporales se
llenan con agua de lluvia, pero se Secan rapidamente y les falta la vegetacion
acuatica o semiacuatica; muchos de los criaderos que se forman en recipien-
tes de varios tipos (pequefios huecos en los arboles, bambts, axilas de hojas)
son temporales y se llenan con agua de lluvia.
2. Turbidez. Indique para cada criadero, si el agua es clara o turbia, y
si nota algun color, indique cual.
3. Movimiento. Indique si el agua es estancada, o, si muestra movimien-
to, anote si este es: lento, moderado o fuerte.
4. Contenido de sal. Para criaderos de tierra indique si el agua es dulce,
- salobre o salada.
5. Contaminacion organica. Para todos los criaderos, en particular en
el caso de recipientes pequefios, debe investigarse el olor del agua y si con-
tiene material musilaginoso o gelatinoso y materia organica fermentada (por
ejemplo, pulpa de coco descompuesta). Todas estas observaciones se deben
registrar en la tarjeta de coleccion.
VEGETACION EN LOS CRIADEROS. Esta seccion se aplica, principal-
mente para los criaderos en el suelo. Registre todos los detalles en la tar-
jeta de coleccion, subrayando o encerrando en un circulo las palabras apropia-
das.
1. Abundancia. Indique la abundancia relativa o ausencia total de los ti-
pos de vegetacion y residuos de la superficie.
2. Materia vegetal y residuos en la superficie. Se debe indicar la pre-
sencia de (1) residuos flotantes, tales como, palos, ramas, hojas, etc., (2)
nata de bacterias y (3) algas, de cualquier clase.
3. Vegetacion. Los tipos de vegetacion prominente, presentes en el sitio,
deben anotarse. En pastizales se incluye toda formacion de graminéas o for- |
mas parecidas; herbaceas hace referencia a la vegetacion baja, no lefiosa; le-
fiosa es la formada por formas arbustivas y arboreas. En el caso de vegeta-
cion flotante, se debe sefialar si se trata de: luchuga de agua, jacintos de agua,
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 51
lirios acuaticos, etc., anote el nombre cientifico si se conoce. Lo mismo debe
hacerse para el caso de la vegetacion sumergida (sizafia de agua, algas fila-
mentosas, etc.). :
FONDO. Para cada .criadero se debe indicar la presencia y naturaleza
de materiales del fondo: 1. Materia inorganica, barro, arena, grava o roca.
2. Materia organica, material vegetal en descomposicion (hojas, palos, rami-
tas, sedimentos finos, etc.), asi como también, el material animal (heces,
orina y desperdicios domésticos).
COLECCIONES INCIDENTALES
Es posible que personas que no estan trabajando directamente en investi-
gaciones sobre mosquitos, puedan hacer colecciones valiosas de los mismos.
Esto lo pueden hacer mientras se encuentren en el campo, y aun cuando no
cuenten, con el equipo, el tiempo y las facilidades necesarias para hacer las
colecciones en la forma como se ha indicado hasta ahora. El equipo basico
necesario en estos casos lo constituye: 2 0 mas tubos o frascos para matar
mosquitos, un aspirador, una red entomologica plegable, cajitas plasticas
con papel toalla o algodén en laminas (''cellucotton"'), papel toalla, goteros,
pipeta de tamafio mediano y grande, dos o mas frascos plasticos con su tapa,
bolsas plasticas, frasquitos plasticos con etanol al 80%, algod6n absorbente,
pinzas entomologicas, rotulos y tarjetas de coleccion.
Cuando se encuentren adultos (para sitios especificos véase el capitulo so-
bre COLECCION DE ADULTOS), se les puede coleccionar directamente con
los frascos o tubos con cloroformo o acetato de etilo e con la red o el aspira-
dor. Los mosquitos no deben dejarse mas de 30 minutos en el frasco para
matarlos, y es importante, que las tiras de papel en aquel, sean reemplaza-
das tan pronto comiencen a humedecerse. La tarjeta de coleccion se llena
como se indico en el capitulo COLECCION DE ADULTOS. El contenido de
los tubos y/o frascos para matar los mosquitos se vacia en una superficie
lisa y limpia, en un lugar protegido contra el viento. Los adultos se acomodan
en las cajitas plasticas, en capas separadas con papel toalla o algod6én en
laminas, usando para ello las pinzas entomoldgicas (para los detalles, véase
el capitulo MUERTE Y PRESERVACION). El numero de coleccion se escri-
be en un papelito de tamafio adecuado que se coloca dentro de la cajita o ca-
jitas, encima del papel que separa los ultimos especimenes. En una sola
cajita se pueden guardar varias colecciones, pero debe aSegurarse de mar-
carlas muy bien y que queden separadas; de tal forma, que no haya riesgo
de que se mezclen. has cajitas con el material coleccionado deben guardar-
se en un lugar seguro y seco y, asegurarse, que estén bien cerradas. Si
se cree conveniente sellarlas, se puede usar esparadrado.
Cuando se encuentren estadios juveniles, (véase el capitulo COLECCION
DE ESTADIOS JUVENILES, para sitios especificos) pueden capturarse direc-
tamente con una pipeta o sumergiendo, gradualmente, una taza plastica por
el margen u orilla del criadero. Si la superficie de éste esta limpia, los es-
tadios juveniles se pueden sacar sumergiendo y sacando rapidamente la taza
plastica. El material asi obtenido se transfiere a un recipiente plastico con
agua limpia. y en el caso de que haya mucho sedimento, se hacen traspasos
sucesivos, para eliminarlos. Las larvas y pupas se matan trasladandolas,
una o pocas a la vez, a frasquitos plasticos con alcohol al 80% (etanol), teniendo
52 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
la precaucion de eliminar tanta agua como sea posible, para no diluir el
alcohol. De acuerdo al tamafio, no se deben poner mas de 5 a 10 larvas por
frasquito. Una pequefia mota de algododn sumergida en el alcohol, dentro del
frasquito, pero sin que la misma toque a los especimenes, debe siempre po-
nerse. El rdotulo con el numero de coleccion se coloca por encima de la mota
de algodon. Para que la muerte se produzca rapidamente, el frasquito, antes
y/o después de colocar las larvas y/o pupas, se expone a la luz directa del sol.
La tarjeta de coleccion se llena como se indica en el capitulo COLECCION DE
ESTADIOS JUVENILES. Esfuerzo especial debe hacerse para coleccionar en
habitats tales como: huecos en los arboles, cuevas de cangrejo, huecos en las
rocas, axilas de hojas, bracteas florales, plantas con ascidias, partes de plan-
tas en el suelo, etc.; pues, la gran mayoria de especies y las formas mas in-
teresantes se encuentran en estos criaderos.
Cuando se encuentren huecos secos en los arboles que puedan servir como
criaderos, debe hacerse un raspado cuidadoso de sus paredes y del fondo y
colocarlo en una bolsa plastica, dentro de la cual debe, también, ponerse un
rotulo con el numero de coleccion.
Las instrucciones para el almacenaje y envio del material se dan en el
ultimo capitulo.
SELECCION Y CRIA
FACILIDADES Y EQUIPO. Un salon o cuarto fresco, con instalacion eléc-
trica, agua corriente y mesas o mesones hacen un laboratorio sencillo para la
cria de mosquitos. El cuarto o salén debe ser a prueba de hormigas, o de lo
contrario, las patas de las mesas y bancas deben colocarse dentro de tarros
con aceite. El aire acondicionado, atn cuando es conveniente para los traba-
jadores, no es necesario, ni aun deseable, para la cria, la cual se puede ha-
cer bajo condiciones muy variadas y en sitios tales como: bajo carpas, en re-
molques, dentro de un carro, etc. Es claro, que las técnicas que se describen
mas adelante deben modificarse para cada situacién particular; pero la téc-
nica general es la misma para todos los casos.
Es en extremo util contar con un microscopio estereoscépico, pero en su
defecto, una buena lupa (10x a 20x) es suficiente. El equipo basico y los Utti-
les necesarios para la cria de mosquitos son: (1) pipetas y goteros, (2) aspi-
radores, (3) redes coladoras con su mango, (4) bandejas o cubetas plasticas
o esmaltadas para la separacion y seleccion del material, (5) tazas plasticas
con tapa, (6) jaulas hechas con frasquitos plasticos, (7) frasquitos plasticos
con su tapa, (8) jaulas hechas con frasquitos plasticos, (9) cajitas plasticas,
(10) lapices de grafito, de cera y etiquetas, (11) papel higiénico y de toalla,
(12) pinzas y pinceles de pelo de camello. Este equipo es para ser usado ex-
clusivamente en el laboratorio, y no debe, por lo tanto, llevarse al campo.
TRATAMIENTO DE LAS COLECCIONES Y SELECCION. Inmediatamente
despues de legar de un viaje o salida al campo, toda coleccién debe examinar-
se detenidamente, y si es posible, separar y seleccionar en el material; si esto
ultimo no es posible, se debe hacer a mas tardar al dia siguiente. En cual-
quier caso, lo primero que se debe hacer, es sacar los adultos que hayan emer-.
gido y aislar las pupas y por lo menos algunas larvas (especialmente si se
trata de especies de Psorophora). Es recomendable revisar y acentuar las
marcas hechas con lapiz graso, en caso de que estas se encuentren borrosas.
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 53
1. Adultos muertos. Los recipientes con adultos muertos deben abrirse
y anadirles una o dos gotas de agua a las tiras de papel, para evitar que los
especimenes se sequen. Este material debe tratarse dentro de las 24 horas
que siguen a la colecciOn del mismo, usando la técnica que se describe en el
proximo capitulo bajo el titulo ADULTOS COLECCIONADOS EN EL CAMPO.
2. Frasquitos para postura. Deben abrirse cuidadosamente para exami-
narlos. Si no tienen suficiente humedad, se les afiade una gota de agua, pero Si
la humedad es excesiva, la hembra se traslada a otro frasquito. Esto Ultimo
se hace de la manera siguiente: se afloja la tapa del frasquito en el cual esta el
mosquito y la misma Se va sacando hacia un lado, a medida que la boca del otro
frasquito se va deslizando sobre la del primero; luego permita que la hembra
suba al nuevo recipiente y sin voltearlo coloquele su tapa y marquelo con el mis-
mo numero del anterior con lapiz graso, tanto en la tapa como en las paredes
(el frasquito original puede usarse de nuevo, después que esté completamente
seco). Todos los frasquitos para postura se ponen aparte para ser tratados pos-
teriormente de acuerdo con las instrucciones que se dan bajo el titulo CRIA DE
PROGENIES.
3. Formacion de la pupa y emergencia del adulto. Las tazas plasticas con
estadios juveniles, requieren especial atencion y mucho cuidado. Si han nacido
muchos adultos en algunas de ellas, se le coloca una red encima y con precau-
cion se le quita la tapa y se deja que los mosquitos vuelen hacia la red, lo cual
se logra mas facilmente si se dan golpecitos en la pared del recipiente que con-
tiene los especimenes. Una vez que todos se hayan ido al fondo de la red, se
les captura con un aspirador y luego se pasan a una jaula hecha con una taza
plastica, esta debe marcarse con el numero de coleccion con lapiz graso. Si
por el contrario, Solo unos pocos adultos han emergido de las pupas, se les
puede sacar directamente con un aspirador, deslizandolo entre la tapa y el bor-
de del recipiente. Como enel caso anterior, los adultos se los transfiere a
jaulas. Las mudas de las pupas se someten al tratamiento que se describe en
el aparte: RECIPIENTES Y JAULAS PARA LA EMERGENCIA DE LOS ADULTOS.
Las jaulas con los adultos se rotulan con etiquetas de papel que se aprisionan
entre la tapa y el borde del recipiente. Las jaulas se mantienen por 1 0 2 dias,
después de los cuales, los adultos se matan y se sometan al tratamiento que se
indica en el capitulo siguiente.
Si en cualquiera de las tazas plasticas hay muchas pupas, varias de ellas
se deben pasar, con una pipeta, a otra, en la cual se ha puesto unos 2 cm (1
pulgada aproximadamente) de agua limpia. El nuevo envase se cubre con una
tapa con un cedazo de tela de nylon y con un lapiz graso se marca el nimero
de coleccion en sus paredes.
4. SeleccioOn. La separacion de los estadios juveniles y su seleccion para
crias individuales y de conjunto, masivas y preservacion, debe hacerse cuanto
antes, y completarse dentro de las 24 horas, después de la captura. Se debe
trabajar con una sola coleccion a la vez y no comenzar con otra, hasta que la
anterior no se haya procesado completamente. Si uno o mas envases plasticos
contienen estadios juveniles de una sola coleccion, o si de la misma se aislaron
previamente pupas y/o larvas en el campo, entonces se debe proceder a juntar
todo el material de dicha coleccion.
Es corriente, encontrar mas de una especie en una coleccion de estadios
juveniles, incluso cuando las colecciones provienen de un mismo criadero; pe-
ro por regla general, en una coleccion determinada, domina una especie, mien-
tras que las otras estan representadas por pocos individuos o por larvas jovenes,
54 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
por pupas o por huevos. Es preferible hacer pocas colecciones en las que
todas las especies estén presentes con sus respectivos estadios juveniles y
adultos (larva, pupa y adultos, macho y hembra, obteniéndolos en las crias
individuales), que hacer muchas colecciones en las que no se puedan asociar
los diferentes estadios y formas, de cada especie. Por lo tanto, en los parra-
fos que siguen, se ha puesto énfasis en la seleccion y cria, pero dando indica-
ciones acerca de métodos mas simples y expeditos, que deben ponerse en
practica por razones diversas, en ciertas circunstancias.
Cuando los recipientes de una coleccidn contienen pocos sedimentos y des-
perdicios pequefios, la separacion y seleccion puede directamente en ellos, una
vez que la sedimentacion haya tenido lugar y que las larvas y pupas hayan su-
bido a la superficie.
Primero: todas las pupas que no fueron aisladas en el campo Se transfieren
individualmente a frasquitos que contengan unos 2 cm (poco menos de una pul-
gada) de agua limpia. Cada frasquito, debe ser marcado con el numero de co-
lecciOn respectivo. Estas pupas, junto con las que fueron aisladas en el cam-
po se someten a un tratamiento especial, tal como se indica mas adelante bajo
el titulo cria de pupas en la seccioOn CRIAS INDIVIDUALES. Por regla general,
cada una de las pupas de una coleccion debe ser aislada, a menos que la colec-
cion consista principalmente de pupas, y el numero de las mismas sea mas de
15, en cuyo caso se sigue el procedimiento descrito en la seccion CRIAS MA-
SIVAS. Si varias especies estan representadas en una colecciOon o si se sospe-
cha la prescencia de una poco comun, es obvio, por consiguiente, la separacion
individual de un buen numero de las mismas (véase cria de pupas mas adelante).
Segundo: en las larvas en el cuarto instar se pueden separar las especies
de un modo aproximado a simple vista y en esta forma cada grupo de especies
se debe separar individualmente en recipientes plasticos. Cada uno de estos
recipientes se marca con el numero de colecci6n y con un numero de sublote
distinto para cada especie; este ultimo se separa del primero por un guion; el
sublote 1, corresponde a una especie, el sublote 2, a una segunda especie y asi
sucesivamente, hasta el sublote 9 para la novena especie. Si en una misma
coleccion hay mas de 9 especies, entonces, se asigna otro numero de colec-
cion, indicando en la nueva tarjeta de coleccidn que ella es una continuaciodn de
la coleccion original y se usan los 9 sublotes del nuevo lote. Las caracteris-
ticas que se toman en cuenta para distinguir las diferentes especies son: apa-
riencia general, color, tamafio, movimientos, posiciOn en el agua, tamafio y
forma de la capsula cefalica y de la antena, pelos y cerdas del cuerpo y longi-
tud y forma del sifon. Con frecuencia, el patron de la pigmentacién abdominal
sirve para distinguir entre algunas especies; por ejemplo, cuarto segmento
abdominal sin pigmentos, en contraste con el resto de los segmentos fuerte-
mente pigmentados. Los estadios mas jovenes se dejan en el recipiente origi-
nal, a menos que ellos se puedan asociar con el cuarto instar de una especie,
en base a las caracteristicas antes sefialadas.
Tercero: de cada sublote, se debe aislar en frasquitos individuales la mi-
tad del numero total de larvas presentes hasta un maximo de 10. En el caso de
que el numero total sea impar, se debe proceder de la siguiente manera: Si so-
lo hay una larva esta se aisla para su cria, si hay 3, se aislan dos, si hay 5,
se aislan tres y asi sucesivamente. Todos los frasquitos se llenan con agua
de los recipientes originales hasta la aitura de unos 2'cm (poco menos de una
pulgada), y se marcan con un lapiz graso con el numero de coleccion y del sub-
lote. El tratamiento posterior a que son sometidos los mismos se describe
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 55
mas adelante en seccion CRIAS INDIVIDUALES. Las larvas remanentes de
cada sublote se separan, hasta un maximo de 20, para matarlas y preservar-
las (véase el capitulo proximo), las aun restaren se transfieren a una taza plas-
tica limpia con unos 2 cm (poco menos de una pulgada) de agua de la coleccion ©
original. Dicha taza se marca con el numero de coleccion y del sublote y las
larvas se procesan como se indica mas adelante en CRIAS MASIVAS. Si se en-
cuentra alguna especie poco comun y quedan mas de 50 larvas en el sublote, la
mitad de ellas se les usa para crias masivas y las otras se matan y preservan.
En el caso de que no sea practico hacer un gran numero de crias masivas, por-
que no hay personal suficiente o por cualquiera otra razon, todas las larvas
que sobran después de aislar las que Se van a criar, se matan y se preservan.
UNA VEZ COLECCIONADO EL MATERIAL NO DEBE DESECHARSE.
El material no seleccionado que queda en los envases de la coleccion ori-
ginal y que contienen los estadios larvarios mas jOvenes, se somete al trata-
miento que se indica en la seccidn CRIAS MASIVAS.
Con mucha frecuencia, es imposible hacer la seleccion de las larvas y las
pupas directamente de las tazas plasticas traidas del campo, pues el color
oscuro del agua o la presencia de residuos y sedimentos en ella no lo permi-
ten. En tales casos, el contenido de la taza se agita con una pipeta y se vierte
en una red coladora (''dip net bag''), el agua obtenida puede ser transferida al
recipiente original o a uno limpio previamente marcado con el numero de co-
leccion. Si el recipiente original se descarta, este debe lavarse bien con el
proposito de recuperar los huevos que se puedan haber quedado adheridos a
las paredes del mismo. Luego, el agua con este fin utilizada debe pasarse
igualmente a través de la red coladora. Todo el concentrado asi obtenido se
sumerge en agua limpia en bandejas que se utilizan para la seleccion y una vez
en ellas se procede a lavar el material cuidadosamente. En caso de necesidad
se puede usar una pipeta o una botella lavadora ("'squeeze bottle''), para separar
el material. Es posible que sea indispensable subdividir el material para su
seleccion en otras bandejas adicionales, en tales caso la transferencia se hace
pasando poco material cada vez. El procedimiento que se describio anterior-
mente, para la separacion de las pupas, de los sublotes y para las crias indi-
viduales, debe seguirse en estos casos, teniéndose en cuenta de que solo el
agua original de la coleccion debe usarse para criar las larvas. Una vez com-
pletada la seleccio6n, el agua en las bandejas de separacion que contienen los
desperdicios y las larvas mas jovenes, se pasa a través de la red; el concen-
trado se pone en las tazas plasticas que contienen el agua original de la colec-
cidn y el agua que se utilizO para el lavado es entonces descartada. Las ban-
dejas se lavan con agua limpia, la cual también se filtra y el concentrado que
se obtenga es igualmente afiadido a las diferentes tazas plasticas que contienen
el agua original de la coleccion.
Las bandejas y las pipetas deben lavarse repetidamente para segurarse de
que no les quede ningin material, antes de proceder a procesar otra coleccion.
A veces, es imposible efectuar todos los pasos indicados en el procedimien-
to antes descrito para la seleccion del material y para separar todos los lotes
y/o sublotes para crias masivas, ademas de realizar las de crias de individuos
(véase CRIAS MASIVAS); incluso puede que tampoco sea posible el separar las
larvas por especies. Sin embargo, el aislamiento de las larvas para crias
individuales debe hacerse siempre, y, Solo en los casos extremos una vez
aislados los especimenes que se van a criar, el remanente puede matarse y
preservarse, siguiendo el procedimiento que se indica en el proximo capitulo:
56 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
MUERTE Y PRESERVACION.
LAVADO DE LOS RECIPIENTES DE COLECCION. Todos los recipientes
y envases que se usen para coleccionar, seleccionar, separar y para crianza,
deben lavarse muy bien antes de usarlos nwevamnerite: Las marcas de lapiz
graso en los recipientes vacfos y secos deben limpiarse muy bien, con un pe-
dazo de algodén absorbente. Los recipientes que estén relativamente limpios
y sin depositos de sales en sus paredes interiores, pueden simplemente, en-
juagarse varias veces con agua limpia, de lo contrario, se les debe lavar con
agua y jabon, nunca con detergentes o polvos limpiadores. Los depositos de
sales y manchas se pueden quitar con un cepillo de nylon. Las peras de goma,
también, se deben lavar muy bien, una vez que se les quite de las pipetas y bom-
bas. EL algod6én en las jaulas para cria debe reemplazarse tan pronto como
muestre signos de credimientos de hongos 0 se ensucie (véase en el GLOSARIO).
Los aspiradores se limpian periddicamente y los filtros, en el tapon de los mis-
mos, deben reemplazarse.
ORGANIZACION DEL LABORATORIO. Con el objeto de ahorrar tiempo y
eliminar cualquier confusién, todo el material de colecci6n debe organizarse
sistematicamente en el laboratorio, incluso, cuando solo hay unas pocas co-
lecciones. Mas adelante se sugieren dos métodos a seguir, la escogencia de
algunos de ellos depende, de la cantidad de material, el numero de crias indi-
viduales y el personal disponible.
Si las colecciones son relativamente pocas (menos de 10) y el numero de
crias individuales, en un momento dado, es menor de 100, todos los envases
de cada colecci6n se pueden colocar juntos, es decir: la cria masiva del lote,
las crias masivas de sublotes, las crias individuales de pupas y de larvas, las
jaulas para el mantenimiento de adultos, los registros de coleccion junto con
las etiquetas y los frasquitos con las mudas de pupas y larvas. Es muy con-
veniente usar cajas bajas y traillas especiales en las que se colocan los diferen-
tes envases y recipientes plasticos; pero ello no es absolutamente necesario.
Las mudas de larva y pupa de una misma cria individual pueden guardarse en
un frasquito. La muda de la larva se pasa de la jaula de cria, junto con su
etiqueta al frasquito y, posteriormente, la muda de la pupa; solo entonces, se
introduce el tapon de algodén al recipiente, controlando, que el rotulo que
identifica a la pupa y el que identifica a la larva se correspondan y ambos se
ponen también, dentro del frasquito con las mudas, antes de taparlo defini-
tivamente. Esto Ultimo es muy importante, pues sirve para comprobar la
asociacion de la muda de la larva y de la pupa como de un mismo individuo.
Cuando hay mas de 10 colecciones, con mas de 100 crias individuales a un
mismo tiempo, es mas eficiente agrupar los recipientes en la siguiente forma:
(1) todas las crias masivas juntas, pero con los sublotes de una coleccion se-
parados en sus grupos junto con el lote dela misma; (2) todos los frasquitos
con larvas individuales; (3) todos los frasquitos con pupas individuales; (4)
todas las jaulas (de frasquitos 0 tazas) con adultos que han estado aislados
por menos de 24 horas; (5) igual que en (4) pero, por mas de 24 horas. Las
tarjetas de coleccidn junto con las tiras de etiquetas con numeros individuales,
correspondientes, deben archivarse en un mismo lugar, en el cual se haran
todos los registros. Con este arreglo, cada uno de los grupos sefalados se
atiende separadamente, hasta que todo el trabajo pertinente al mismo se com-
plete y se hagan las anotaciones, como se indica mas adelante en las secciones
CRIAS MASIVAS y CRIAS INDIVIDUALES. Se ahorra tiempo, si las mudas de
larvas y pupas, cada una con su propio numero de identificacion, se colocan en
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar a7
frasquitos separados. En este caso, la asociacion de los estadios y las formas
se hace posteriormente, al momento de montar el material.
Es muy importante preparar de antemano para cada coleccion, tiras de
etiquetas con numeros repetidos, para rotular las crias individuales, como se
- especificé en la seccidn ROTULACION, en el capitulo REGISTROS DE COLEC -
CION. Véase también, en ese capitulo, la parte correspondiente a la rotula-
cion del material de sublotes.
CRIAS MASIVAS. Se distinguen tres tipos de crias masivas o de conjunto.
(1) Cria masiva de un lote, se hace con todo el material que queda después que
se han separado las larvas del cuarto estadio, es decir, las larvas mas
jovenes y los huevos. También puede hacerse con toda la coleccion original
no separada en especies. (2) Crias masivas de sublotes que se hacen a partir
de las larvas seleccionadas de la coleccion original. Cada sublote, presumi-
blemente, esta formado por individuos de una misma especie. (3) Crias masi-
vas de progenies se hacen a partir de la postura de una hembra. Una vez efec-
tuada la seleccion, la cria de un lote ylas de sus sublotes se agrupan en un
area escogida para crias masivas. Los recipientes no Se cierran, Sino que
se cubren con las tapas invertidas. El nivel a que alcanza el agua en el reci-
piente, se marca con un lapiz graso; si hay mucha evaporacion, se afiade agua
destilada, o en su defecto agua del grifo, hasta el nivel original.
Cada recipiente debe examinarse dos veces al dia. El lote y sus sublotes
se examinan al mismo tiempo. Si en la cria masiva de un lote aparece una
especie distinta a las separadas durante la seleccion, se le aisla, se le asigna
un numero de sublote el cual, asi como también el numero de lote se marca en
el recipiente. El numero de sublote que se asigna debe ser el que sigue al ul-
timo, de esa colecci6n. Cuando las larvas de este nuevo sublote(s) alcancen
el cuarto estadio, algunas de ellas se aislan para crias individuales, otras pa-
ra matarlas y preservarlas y el resto para crias masivas (véase TRATAMIEN-
TO DE LAS COLECCIONES Y SELECCION). Las crias masivas de un lote de-
ben mantenerse, por lo menos, durante 10 dias, para permitir la eclosion y
el desarrollo de las larvas.
Las tarjetas de coleccion se revisan en lo pertinente a cada lote y sublotes,
para determinar si es necesario aislar mas pupas o larvas. Si no se ha llena-
do la cuota de 15 crias individuales de pupas, previstas en la tarjeta de colec-
cion, o Si en casos especiales, se desean hacer mas crias, se separan las pu-
pas necesarias y se colocan, cada una, en un frasquito plastico marcado con
el numero del lote. Estos recipientes se apartan para procesarlos como se
describe mas adelante, en el aparte cria de pupas de la seccion CRIAS INDI-
VIDUALES. Si no se ha llenado la cuota de 10 (en ciertos casos son mas)
crias individuales de larvas, se separan las larvas necesarias del cuarto ins-
tar y cada una se coloca en un frasquito plastico marcado con el numero del
lote y sublote que le corresponda. Estos frasquitos se apartan para procesar-
los como se indica en la parte cria de larvas en la seccion CRIAS INDIVIDUA-
LES.
Todas las pupas de cada lote y sublote que queden, después de haber se-
parado y aislado las de las crias individuales, se colocan en grupos de 5 a 10
(de acuerdo con el tamafio) en frasquitos plasticos con agua limpia. En el caso
de que muchas de las larvas se transformen en pupa al mismo tiempo, se les
puede poner, hasta 200, en jaulas de tazas plasticas para la emergencia de los
adultos. Tanto los frasquitos como las jaulas se marcan con el numero del
lote y sublote, con un lapiz graso y se les coloca junto con el resto de las pupas,
de la misma colecciOn, para procesarlos, como Se indica mas adelante, en la
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
seccion RECIPIENTES PARA LA EMERGENCIA DE ADULTOS.
Junto a cada cria masiva de un lote y de sus sublotes se coloca un frasqui-
to plastico lleno de alcohol al 80 G, hasta los 3/4 de su capacidad, marcado
con el numero del lote y sublote respectivo, en las paredes y en la tapa; ade-
mas, adentro, se les coloca una etiqueta de papel, con el numero del lote y del
sublote. A estos recipientes se transfieren todas las mudas de larvas y lar-
vas y pupas muertas de las crias masivas correspondientes. Antes de hacer
la transferencia, los especimenes se lavan con agua limpia en una bandeja
plastica, descartando los que no estén en buen estado. Terminadas las crias
masivas, el material preservado en alcohol se procesa en la forma que Se in-
dica en el proximo capitulo (CRIAS INCOMPLETAS).
Si el agua original de la coleccion contiene bastantes sedimentos, no es
necesario, generalmente, afiadir alimento a las crias masivas; sin embargo,
si el desarrollo de los organismos es muy lento se les puede agregar una pe-
quena cantidad de bizcocho para perro, pulverizado, o, de tiempo en tiempo,
comida de laboratorio ("laboratory chow"). Para las larvas de anofelinos el
alimento debe espolvorearse, ligeramente, sobre la superficie; para todas las
otras, excepto las carnivoras, se le mezcla con agua hasta hacer una mezla
liviana, una gota del cual se coloca con una pipeta en el fondo del recipiente de
cria.
La cria masiva de larvas carnivoras presenta un problema especial. Tan
pronto como se les descubra, se les debe separar individualmente en frasqui-
tos plasticos y alimentarlas con larvas pequefias de otra (u otras) especies
(véase mas adelante CRIAS ESPECIALES).
CRIAS INDIVIDUALES. Se hacen a partir de las larvas (cria de larvas)
o de las pupas (cria de pupas) que fueron aisladas en el campo o en el labora-
torio. Los frasquitos plasticos que las contienen, y que estan identificados con
el numero del lote y sublote reciben ahora, un numero individual de cria que
identificara los estadios de cada individuo, durante la cria y el tratamiento
posterior (vease ROTULACION, en el capitulo REGISTROS DE COLECCION).
Cria de pupas. Todos los recipientes con pupas, marcados con el mismo
numero de coleccion se agrupan y se ponen junto con su tarjeta de coleccion.
Se toma, entonces, una tira completa de rotulos de la serie -100, y se escribe
el numero de coleccion enfrente del guidn, en cada nimero. Comenzando por
la parte superior de la tira, se cortan etiquetas que contengan nimeros repeti-
dos (en el caso de la serie -100, se repiten de dos en dos) y se la coloca al re-
cipiente que corresponda, aprisionandola entre la boca del frasco y la tapa.
Esta operacion se repite hasta que se rotulen todos los recipientes. En la tar-
jeta de coleccion se van registrando los nimeros de cria que se asignan, po-
niendo una marca (V) enfrente de los numeros respectivos. El resto de la tira
se adjunta, con un sujeta-papeles, a la tarjeta de coleccion, de manera que se
las pueda utilizar para rotular otra u otras pupas, que se aislen de las crias
masivas de la misma coleccion. Una vez que se haya completado este trabajo,
los recipientes se agrupan, se les coloca aparte, para tratarlos de la manera
que se indica mas adelante, en la secci6n RECIPIENTES PARA LA EMERGEN-
CIA DE ADULTOS.
Cria de larvas. Todos los recipientes que contengan larvas (0 con las mu-
das de las larvas asociadas con pupas), que estan marcados con el mismo nt-
mero de coleccion, se reunen y se dividen de acuerdo a los sublotes y se pone
la tarjeta de coleccion junto con ellos. Luego se marcan, tantas como sean
necesarias, tiras enteras de rotulos de las series -10, -20, -30 para cada
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 59
uno de los sublotes, escribiendo en numero de colecci6n enfrente del guidn de
cada uno de los numero impresos. Trabajando con un sublote a la vez, corte
de la tira de rotulos, etiquetas con los numeros repetidos (en este caso cada
numero se repite tres veces) e insértela al recipiente en la forma como se
hizo en el caso anterior. - Esta operacion se repite hasta que se hayan rotula-
do todos los frasquitos con larvas del sublote. Los numeros asignados a cada
cria se registran en la tarjeta de coleccién, colocando una marca (Vv) enfrente
del numero correspondiente impreso en la tarjeta. El resto de la tira se ad-
junta a la tarjeta de colecciOn con un sujeta-papeles. La misma operacion se
hace para cada uno de los sublotes de cada coleccion. Las tiras de etiquetas
anexas a la tarjeta de coleccion se pueden usar mas adelante, si se aislan lar-
vas de las crias masivas de sublotes. Finalizada esta operaci6n, se procede
como Se indica en la seccion que sigue.
FRASQUITOS PARA CRIAR LARVA. Los frasquitos con las larvas (véase
cria de larvas en el parrafo anterior) deben examinarse dos veces al dia, pre-
feriblemente antes del medio dia y avanzada la tarde. Todos los frasquitos que
contengan mudas de larvas se apartan para su procesamiento posterior. Luego
de realizada esta operacion se toman individualmente cada uno de los frasquitos
vertiendo su contenido en una pequefia bandeja de separacion con agua limpia y
con una pipeta se transfiere la pupa a un frasquito plastico con unos 2 cm de
agua limpia. Se cortan dos de los numeros triplicados de la etiqueta, y se fijan
a este Ultimo recipiente en la forma ya sefialada. Estas pupas se colocan junto
con las otras de la misma coleccion y se les procesa como se indica en la sec-
cion que sigue. El frasquito en donde estaba originalmente la larva, se enjuaga
y se llena con unos 5 ml de alcohol al 80%, luego a él se transfiere con una pi-
peta la muda de la larva contenida en la bandeja. El rotulo que resta, con una
de los numeros triplicados, se le coloca de la manera ya descrita. El frasqui-
to se pone aparte para procesarlo como se describe en la seccidn MUDAS, en
el capitulo MUERTE Y PRESERVACION. Es obvio, que esta misma operaci6n
se repite para todas y cada una de las larvas que se estan criando.
Los frasquitos con larvas muertas o moribundas, se colocan aparte para
procesarlos, inmediatamente después que se haya terminado el trabajo con las
crias individuales, en la forma que se describe en la secci6n CRIAS PAR-
CIALES en el proximo capitulo. NO DESCARTE NI QUITE LOS ROTULOS A
ESTOS RECIPIENTES.
Si las colecciones que se estan trabajando son pocas (véase TRATAMIEN-
TO DE LAS COLECCIONES Y SELECCION), las mudas de las larvas pueden
ponerse cada una, en una capsula de vidrio con alcohol al 80% y con su eti-
queta respectiva. Posteriormente, se las trata como se sefiala en la seccion
MUDAS del capitulo préximo.
Alas larvas que se estan criando no hay que afiadirles alimento alguno,
excepto en el caso de las carnivoras; para éstas, asi como también para las
de Mansonia y otras larvas que requieren de cuidados especiales, se dan ins-
trucciones mas adelante en la seccién CRIAS ESPECIALES.
RECIPIENTES PARA LA EMERGENCIA DE ADULTOS. Los recipientes
en los que se estan criando las pupas seleccionadas en el campo u obtenidas
de crias masivas del lote, o de cria de larvas y marcados con sus numeros de
crias individuales, deben examinarse dos veces al dia, preferiblemente tem-
prano en la mafiana y avanzada la tarde. Los que contienen adultos vivos o
muertos, se colocan aparte para su posterior tratamiento. Los adultos vivos
se les saca del recipiente de la siguiente manera: se afloja la tapa y se le va
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
haciendo a un lado, al mismo tiempo, que la boca de otro frasquito se la va
deslizando en la del primero; se dan entonces, pequefios golpes en el frasquito
con el adulto, para que éste suba al otro recipiente. Una vez que el mosquito
ha subido al recipiente éste se tapa rapidamente antes de voltearlo. El nime-
ro duplicado del rotulo se corta en dos, uno de los cuales se coloca en el reci-
piente con el adulto, de la manera usual. Este material se somete, entonces,
al procedimiento indicado mas adelante en ENVASES Y JAULAS PARA EL MAN-
TENIMIENTO DE ADULTOS. Al envase con la muda de la pupa se le hechas
alcohol al 80% (una cantidad igual al agua que contiene), se le coloca dentro
el rotulo que queda y se le pone aparte para procesarlo como se indica mas
adelante en la secciOn MUDAS, en el capitulo préximo. La misma operacién
se hace con cada uno de los recipientes con pupas. :
Todos los recipientes con pupas muertas y moribundas y adultos nacidos
solo parcialmente o muy débiles, deben separarse y procesarse inmediatamen-
te después, que se haya terminado con las crias individuales, como se indica
en la seccidn CRIAS PARCIALES del capitulo préximo. NUNCA DESECHE
MATERIAL DE ESTE TIPO NI LE QUITE LOS ROTULOS.
Cuando se usan jaulas hechas con tazas plasticas, para la emergencia de
los adultos, las mismas se deben examinar dos veces al dia, como en el caso
anterior. Los adultos se sacan de las jaulas con un aspirador y se les tras-
lada a otra igual pero sin agua. Esta nueva jaula se marca con el numero de
lote y de sublote y se le coloca junto con los otros recipientes para el mante-
nimiento de adultos para procesarlos como se indica mas adelante. Si nacen
pocos adultos en un momento determinado, estos se pueden trasladar en gru-
pos pequefios, 5 como maximo, a recipientes para el mantenimiento de adul-
tos similares a los que se usan para crias individuales. Una vez que todos
los adultos han sido sacados, todas las mudas de las pupas, asi como todas
las pupas muertas, se transfieren con una pipeta a un frasquito con alcohol
al 80%, que se marca con el numero de colecci6én y del sublote correspon-
diente. Este se coloca junto con el recipiente para la emergencia de adultos,
en el cual estan las pupas vivas, hasta que nazcan todos los adultos. El fras-
quito con el material preservado sera luego tratado como se describe en el
paragrafo de Crias masivas, en la seccién ADULTOS CRIADOS, en el préximo
capitulo.
ENVASES Y JAULAS PARA EL MANTENIMIENTO DE ADULTOS. Los
adultos obtenidos de las crias deben mantenerse por los menos durante 24
horas y preferiblemente por 48 horas, antes de matarlos y procesarlos en la
forma que se describe en la seccion ADULTOS CRIADOS del capitulo préxi-
mo. Si se les mantiene durante 24 horas, habra al mismo tiempo dos grupos
de jaulas; el que contiene los adultos que estan siendo aislados y el que tiene
los que se aislaron el dia anterior. Si se les mantiene por 48 horas habra un
tercer grupo. Cada grupo debe estar claramente marcado con la fecha en que
se aislaron los adultos.
Los recipientes en los cuales se mantienen los adultos requieren relati-
vamente poca atencion, y no es necesario alimentar los mosquitos o abrir las
jaulas mientras estan en ellos. Todos los grupos de jaulas y/o recipientes, se
deben revisar por lo menos una vez al dia, para sacar los ejemplares muer-
tos y procesarlos lo mas pronto posible, de acuerdo con las instrucciones que
aparecen en la seccién ADULTOS CRIADOS del proéximo capitulo. Después
del periodo de 24 o 48 horas, todos los mosquitos se procesan siguiendo esas
mismas instrucciones.
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 61
Las jaulas hechas de tazas plasticas deben llevar una pequefia mota de al-
godén absorbente, humedecido encima de la redecilla de nylon que las cubre y
sobre el algodon se pone una tapa invertida. Todos los adultos muertos se
sacan con un aspirador tan pronto como sea posible y debe tenerse la precau-
cidn de poner nuevamente el algodon que tapa el orificio por donde se introduce
el aspirador. Estos adultos se ponen dentro de un frasquito seco y limpio jun-
to con sus etiquetas y se procesan lo antes posible, de acuerdo a las instruc-
ciones de la seccién ADULTOS CRIADOS del siguiente capitulo.
Los frasquitos plasticos que contienen varios adultos se procesan de la
misma forma que las jaulas de tazas plasticas.
CRIA DE PROGENIES. Alas hembras que estan en los frasquitos para
posturas, debe prestarseles mucha atencion en el laboratorio (véase en el ca-
pitulo COLECCION DE ADULTOS la seccion TRATAMIENTO DE LAS COLEC-
CIONES Y SELECCION). Los frasquitos para postura se preparan de la ma-
nera siguiente: Primero, se reemplaza la tapa plastica por una fina tela de ny-
lon, la cual es sostenida en la boca del frasquito por otra tapa plastica en la
que la parte central ha sido eliminada. Encima de la tela se coloca una mo-
tita de algoddn humedecido con soluciOn de azucar al 10%, la cual se cubre
ligeramente con la tapa plastica original. Los recipientes para postura se de-
ben examinar diariamente, y el algodén con la soluciOn debe ser reemplazado
en caso de que el mismo se observen hongos o este se haya secado. A las
hembras contenidas en los frasquitos, se les recomienda darles diariamente
una comida de sangre, para lo cual se coloca la superficie interior del ante-
brazo o el dedo, contra la cubierta de nylon. Silos mosquitos no toman san-
gre humana o si hay la posibilidad de que puedan estar infestados, se debe
entonces, ensayar alimentarlos con mamiferos o aves de varias clases. Para
obtenerlo sdlo basta poner en contacto la boca del envase, con una zona
apropiada del cuerpo del donante. La comida diaria de sangre es muy impor -
tante para obtener posturas, por lo menos en el caso de ciertas especies.
Ello es particularmente cierto para las del género Psorophora.
El sitio de postura en la naturaleza es diferente para los diferentes géne-
ros (en algunos casos esta variacion ocurre en diferentes especies dentro de
un mismo género) y por lo tanto, es necesario tratar de proveer las condiciones
apropiadas para cada una de las especies con las que se esta trabajando. Pa-
ra los Anopheles se debe afiadir unas pocas gotas de agua a traves de la rejilla
de nylon, con el objeto de mantener una fina pelicula de agua en el algodon que
esta en el fondo del recipiente; ello se logra aplicando la boca de un gotero a
la rejilla y haciendo pasar el agua a través dela misma. Se debe tener cuida-
do de no mojar al mosquito. Para Culex, Aedeomyia, Uranotaenia, Culiseta,
Mansonia, Toxorhynchites y otras formas que ponen los huevos en la superfi-
cie del agua, aislados o en grupos, se debe afiadir agua en tal cantidad, que el
nivel de la misma alcance hasta 1 cm por encima del algodon. A muchas de
las especies de Mansonia es necesario ponerles un disco de papel impermea-
ble en la superficie del agua (véase CRIAS ESPECIALES). Para todos los
otros grupos, particularmente Aedes, Haemagogus, Psorophora y géneros
afines no debe haber agua libre dentro del recipiente, de tal manera, que en
la tirilla de papel toalla en el interior del frasquito para postura y que esta en.
contacto con el algodédn himedo del fondo se forme un gradiente de humedad.
Estas formas mencionadas en Ultimo término ponen sus huevos, principalmen-
te, sobre la tirilla de papel. Variaciones de los métodos mencionados, deben
ensayarse con las especies de otros géneros para simular las condiciones de
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
los sitios de postura en la naturaleza. Papel toalla de diferentes texturas,
color y capacidad de absorcion, asi como también tiras de papel resistente a
la humedad ("wet-strength paper"), deben también ensayarse. Es posible, que
para algunas especies sea necesario poner el recipiente para postura en la os-
curidad o envolverlo completamente o parcialmente en papel oscuro.
Las hembras gravidas coleccionadas en el campo en caso de poner, lo ha-
cen entre el tercero o cuarto dia después de la captura. No siempre es nece-
sario e incluso puede ser contraproducente dar comidas de sangre a estas
hembras. Aquellas que estan llenas de sangre, ya sea en el campo o en el
laboratorio, necesitan de 5 a 10 dias o mas para poner; a éstas si se les debe
dar una comida diaria de sangre, como se indic6 en el primer paragrafo de
esta seccion.
La revision diaria de los envases de postura y la cual debe hacerse pre-
feriblemente temprano en la mafiana, consiste en lo siguiente: (1) revisar y
mantener el nivel adecuado del agua; si hay condensacion en las paredes se
quita la tapa plastica de encima del cedazo; si hay hongos en el algodon en el
fondo del frasquito 0 en cualquiera otra parte, el mosquito se transfiere a un
nuevo recipiente para postura; (2) humedecer o reemplazar el algod6én hume-
decido con la solucion azucarada; (3) dar una comida de sangre a los mosquitos
(posiblemente esto tenga que hacerse en la oscuridad para algunas especies);
(4) observar detenidamente si hay huevos y (5) procesar el mosquito y sus
huevos si es el caso.
Si la hembra muere antes de poner, pero aparentemente esta llena de hue-
vos ya desarrollados, se le debe disectar; silos huevos tienen el coridn com-
pletamente formado se someten al procedimiento que se describe en los proxi-
mos paragrafos. Todas las hembras muertas y no gravidas se dejan en los
recipientes para postura originales y se tratan, tan pronto como Sea posible,
siguiendo el procedimiento que se describe en el proximo capitulo bajo la sec-
cion ADULTOS COLECCIONADOS EN EL CAMPO.
Aquellas hembras que no pongan, aun cuando se les haya provisto con todas
las condiciones necesarias para que lo hicieran, se les puede inducir a poner
de la siguiente manera, cortandoles las alas cuando estén ligeramente anes-
tesiadas y dejandolas que se recobren sobre papel de toalla humeda, dentro
del recipiente 0, con un método mas drastico, pero da buenos resultados, de-
-capitandola. La anestesia con CO 9 puede, también, dar buenos resultados y
se le debe probar usando un eyector de corcho del tipo descrito por Bruce-
Chwatt (1964).
Después que cada hembra haya puesto, es necesario procesarlo lo antes
posible. Hasta el momento de la postura los recipientes estaban marcados
solamente con el numero de coleccion; pero ahora, a cada hembra y su pro-
genie debe asignarsele un numero de sublote del -1 al -9 dentro del lote
al cual pertenecen. Muy raramente habra mas de 9 crias de progenies en un
mismo lote. Si este fuera el caso, se le asigna un nuevo numero de lote alas
series sobrantes, disponiéndose asi de 9 numeros adicionales para los sub-
lotes de las progenies.
Los numeros que se asignan a estos sublotes se registran en la tarjeta de
coleccion en la seccién correspondiente a los sublotes, poniendo una marca (Vv)
enfrente del que corresponda. El siguiente paso, consiste en preparar dos eti-
quetas de papel con el numero de lote y de sublote; a una de ellas se afiada la
letra P después del numero de sublote y servira para identificar la progeni-
tora, la otra, que se repetira cuantas veces sea necesario, servira para iden-
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 63
tificar la progenie durante la cria masiva. La progenitora puede, entonces,
sacarsele del recipiente y pasarla a otro limpio, de la manera usual y al cual
se pone una tapa en la que se ha introducido la etiqueta de identificacion. Este
recipiente se pone aparte y se somete al procedimiento que se indica en el
proximo capitulo en la seécion ADULTOS CRIADOS.
‘Los huevos y crias masivas que se obtienen de las hembras cautivas se
trabajan de diferentes maneras, de acuerdo al género al cual pertenecen.
(1) Para Anopheles, los huevos se incuban utilizando una taza plastica
llena con agua del grifo (hasta los 3/4 aproximadamente) y un anillo de papel
encerado flotando en su superficie. La taza plastica se marca con el numero
de coleccion. Los huevos se transfieren tan pronto como sea posible al reci-
piente de incubacion, sacando la tira de papel toalla y el algodon del recipien-
te para postura, y sumergiéndolos en el agua de la taza plastica a traves del
anillo de papel encerado. Los huevos que se hayan adheridos a la pared del
recipiente para postura, se recogen con un pincel de pelo de camello y se su-
mergen en el agua del recipiente de incubacion, por el centro del anillo de
papel. Todos los huevos deben quedar flotando dentro del anillo. Unos 10 hue-
vos de cada postura deben preservarse, como Se indica en la seccion HUEVOS
del capitulo proximo. El incubador ya listo se pone aparte y cuando nace la
primera larva (entre 3 a 5 dias) se pone un pedacito de levadura en el borde in-
terno del anillo, de tal manera, que toque el agua. Una vez que nazcan todas
las larvas, se quita el anillo de papel encerado y se le espolvorea, parcamen-
te, el alimento dos veces diaria. El tratamiento posterior de este material se
encuentra en las instrucciones generales que se dan mas adelante para crias
masivas, preservacion de larvas y aislamiento de crias individuales.
(2) Para Culex y otras formas que ponen los huevos en masas 0 individual-
mente en la superficie del agua, estos se transfieren con un pincel de pelo de
camello a una taza plastica lena de agua del grifo, hasta los 3/4 de su capaci-
dad. La taza se marca con un lapiz graso con el numero de coleccion, y del
sublote correspondiente. Cuando aparezca la primera larva, se coloca una
pequefia cantidad de alimento con una pipeta una o dos veces diarias.
(3) Para las especies de Mansonia, las masas de huevos 0 los discos de
papel resistente a la humedad con los huevos pegados a los mismos se pasan
una taza plastica con agua del grifo hasta el nivel usual. El recipiente se mar-
ca en la forma indicada y las larvas se alimentan de la manera antes sefalada.
Se pueden colocar discos o tiras adicionales de papel resistente a la humedad,
para que las larvas tengan de donde asirse. Véase mas adelante la secciOon
CRIAS ESPECIALES, para el subsecuente tratamiento.
(4) Para Aedes, Psorophora, Haemagogus y otras formas, que ponen los
huevos por encima de la superficie del agua se debe siguir el procedimiento
siguiente: (a) Periodo inicial de acondicionamiento: los envases para postura
deben mantenerse cerrados a fin de proveer un ambiente htmedo para el
desarrollo de los huevos. Después de 3 0 4 dias se examinan 1 0 2 huevos al
microscopio o con una lupa; silos huevos estan todavia turgidos, probable-
mente todavia sean viables y estan listos para secarlos. (b) Periodo de
desecacion: la tapa del recipiente para postura se reemplaza con otra, con
cedazo para permitir que los huevos se sequen. La duracion de este periodo
varia con las especies y se tiene que determinar empiricamente. Periddica-
mente examine 1 0 2 huevos, para determinar si estos atin permanecen viables
ono; en el ultimo caso, ello puede significar, que para eSa especie en particu-
lar, el perfodo de desacacion no es necesario y por lo tanto debe omitirse.
64 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
(c) Periodo de hidratacion: si los huevos permanecen turgidos después de 3 a 5
dias, el recipiente que los contiene se llena con agua del grifo o preferiblemen-
te con agua lluvia, y todo el contenido, agua y huevos, se vacia en una taza
plastica marcada con el numero del lote y del sublote. Luego la misma se lle-
na de agua hasta los 3/4 de su capacidad y se le agrega una pastilla de vitami-
na C, una gota de alimento y un pedacito de levadura. Silos huevos son viables
y estan propiamente acondicionados la eclosion debe producirse en unos 30 mi-
nutos. Enel caso contrario, ponga los huevos sobre una tira de papel toalla
seco, coloquela dentro del recipiente usado originalmente para la postura y
pongale una tapa cedazo. Los huevos se dejan secar por varios dias, después
de los cuales estos se vuelven a hidratar nuevamente. El proceso se repite una
o mas veces hasta que las larvas nazcan.
De todas las crias de progenies debe preservarse, siempre que ello sea
posible, una muestra de 5 a 10 huevos antes de empezar la cria masiva de los
mismos. Para los métodos de preservacion véase la seccion HUEVOS en el
capitulo siguiente. Asi mismo, una muestra de 5a 10 ejemplares de cada
instar debe también, preservarse de acuerdo a las instrucciones de la sec-
cion LARVAS Y PUPAS del proximo capitulo. Es conveniente esperar hasta
que todos los especimenes alcancen el mismo instar, antes de seleccionar los
ejemplares de un instar determinado para preservarlos, pues asi se evita el
que haya un proporcion muy desigual de los sexos cuando se termine la cria
(los machos se desarrollan mas rapidamente que las hembras).
Todas las crias de progenies se ponen junto con las crias masivas, de
las cuales son un subgrupo y se les procesa de acuerdo con el procedimiento
dado anteriormente en la seccion CRIAS MASIVAS. Las mudas que quedan en
los recipientes para incubacion se identifican con el numero del lote y sublote
apropiados y se les preserva de acuerdo al procedimiento que se da en el ca-
pitulo siguiente. Asegurese de alimentar las larvas regularmente, pero no
excesivamente. Una vez que todos los individuos de una cria de progenie al-
cancen el cuarto instar, se aislan 10 de ellos para criarlos individualmente.
A cada individuo se le asigna un numero de cria de la manera usual, usando
las tiras de etiquetas con los numeros repetidos tres veces; por ejemplo, las
crias individuales provenientes de mosquitos obtenidos de cria masiva de pro-
genies 52-1, se identifican 52-10, 52-11, 52-12 y asi sucesivamente hasta
52-19; los provenientes de cria masiva de pregenies 52-2 se identifican 52-20,
52-21 y asi sucesivamente hasta 52-29. La etiqueta, como se explic6 anterior-
mente, se aprisiona entre el borde de la boca y la tapa y en la tarjeta de colec-
cion se van registrando, de la manera usual, los numeros asignados. Los
recipientes con las crias individuales se apartan y se procesan junto con todos
los otros en la manera descrita antes en la seccion CRIAS INDIVIDUALES.
Las crias de progenie requieren de mucha atenci6n y consumen mucho
tiempo; por lo tanto, si se cuenta con poco personal, solamente se pueden afec-
tuar unas cuantas a un mismo tiempo y posiblemente algunos de los pasos
descritos tengan que eliminarse, como por ejemplo, el aislamiento de ejem-
plares y preservacion de muestras de todos los estadios larvarios. Sin embar-
go, las crias de progenies son sumamente importantes para estudios taxono-
micos y, por lo tanto, debe hacerse todo lo posible para realizar todo el pro-
cedimiento descrito para una hembra de cada especie por lo menos.
INCUBACION DE HUEVOS. Masas de huevos o huevos individuales colec-
cionados en el campo, se tratan de manera diferente de acuerdo al tipo de
huevo y segun los métodos sugeridos en la seccidén CRIAS DE PROGENIES.
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 65
De alli en adelante, las crias deben tratarse como Sse indica en la secciOn CRIAS
MASIVAS, excepto que en este caso hay que afiadir comida regularmente. Si
se aprecia la existencia de mas de una especie las mismas se deben separar
en sublotes. Cuando todas las larvas en el cuarto instar estén para mudar, se
les procesa como se describio en la seccion TRATAMIENTO DE LAS COLEC-
CIONES Y SELECCION, para la seleccion de larvas que van a ser preservadas
y las que se van a criar individualmente.
TRATAMIENTO DEL -MATERIAL SECO. Muestras de suelo tomadas en
depresiones del terreno o de las orillas de los charcos temporales o bien del
raspado de los huecos en los arboles, o de otros tipos de habitats formados por
recipientes naturales (véase COLECCION DE HUEVOS Y MATERIAL SECO en
el capitulo COLECCION DE ESTADIOS JUVENILES), a menudo contienen
huevos de mosquitos que al ponerlos en agua se desarrollan y dan origen a
larvas. El material que se obtenga de esta forma, debe ponerse en tazas plas-
ticas marcadas con su correspondiente numero de coleccion y luego se le afia-
de agua, lluvia o del grifo, hasta el nivel usual y una pastilla de vitamina C.
Algunas larvas puede que nazcan en los primeros 30 minutos, pero otras puede
que no lo hagan hasta después de 24 horas. Sino hay eclosion alguna, el ma-
terial se cuela en una red coladora se concentra y Se seca en un papel toalla
dentro de una taza plastica. Este proceso para inducir la eclosion quiza tenga
que repetirse mas de una vez, en algunas especies. Las larvas se crian en la
forma antes indicada en la seccién CRIAS MASIVAS. La separacion en sublotes
y el aislamiento de individuos para criarlos se hace de la manera descrita en
la seccion TRATAMIENTO DE LA COLECCION Y SELECCION.
CRIAS ESPECIALES. Algunas especies requieren atencion especial, asi
como también métodos especiales para las crias, tanto individuales como ma-
sivas. Solamente mencionaremos dos casos especificos; pero si se encuentra
alguna dificultad con otros tipos de larvas deben ensayarse variaciones de las
técnicas de cria para reproducir condiciones analogas a las que existen en
los habitats naturales de la especie que Se trata.
Los estadios juveniles de las especies del género Mansonia, pueden criar-
se usando la técnica descrita por Laurence, Page y Smith (1962). Se colocan
discos de papel resistente al agua, de 1 cm de diametro, en la superficie del
agua en el recipiente para la crianza (un disco para cada cria individual, va-
rios en el caso de la cria masiva). Si no se tiene papel de esta clase puede
usarse un papel toalla fuerte. Silas larvas se despegan del disco este se debe
cambiar. la pupa se forma en la parte inferior del disco y ella misma Se fija
fuertemente al papel. Para transferir la pupa, se levanta el disco de papel con
una pinzas y se pone en la superficie del agua en al recipiente para la emergen-
cia de adultos.
Las larvas carnivoras, generalmente, se reconocen facilmente porque
tienen la cabeza grande y muy prolongada enfrente de las antenas, o porque las
maxilas y las mandibulas estan bien desarrolladas y prolongadas. Las formas
carnivoras son por lo general, de movimientos lentos; pero cuando se les
disturba o cuando atacan a la presa se mueven en forma brusca y repentina.
Las larvas carnivoras deben aislarse en recipientes individuales tan pronto
como se les descubra y suministrarles larvas de mosquitos de algunas de las
especies mas comunes. El desarrollo de las larvas carnivoras es rapido si
el suministro de presas se mantiene regularmente. Cuando se transforman en
pupas, debe procederse con mucho detenimiento para escojer las pupas las mu-
das de las larvas correspondientes, pues en el mismo recipiente es probable
66 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
que también existan mudas y pupas de las presas.
MUERTE Y PRESERVACION
EQUIPO Y UTILES. Para matar y preservar mosquitos, se necesita el
equipo y utiles siguientes: (1) tubos o frascos para matar mosquitos, (2) aspi-
radores, (3) red entomolégica, (4) pinzas ordinarias y entomologicas, (5) caji-
tas plasticas grandes y pequefias, (6) papel toalla o algod6on en laminas ("'cellu-
cotton'') cortado en cuadrados del tamafio de las cajitas plasticas, (7) algodon
absorbente, (8) capsulas de gelatina, (9) tiras de etiquetas, (10) alcohol etilico
al 80% , (11) solucion de formalina al 5% y al 10% (2% y 4% de formaldehido),
(12) cAarpulas de vidrio con tapas de neopreno, (13) pipetas y goteros, (14) cu-
betas para seleccion, (15) agujas de diseccidn, (16) vaso quimico u otro reci-
piente para calentar agua.
ADULTOS COLECCIONADOS EN EL CAMPO. Los adultos que se colec-
cionan en el campo, por lo general se les mata de inmediato y se les coloca
en tazas o frasquitos plasticos con papel toalla o higiénico (véase el capitulo
referente a COLECCION DE ADULTOS), hasta que se les lleva al laboratorio.
Los ejemplares que se obtengan en colecciones incidentales (véase el capitulo
correspondiente) deben procesarse de la misma manera que se describe mas
adelante, pero esta debe hacerse por lo general mientras todavia se esta en
el campo. No es aconsejable el hacer montajes finales de adultos en alfileres
cuando se realizan encuestas en el campo, pues ello requiere mucho tiempo y
por las dificultades que se encuentran para darles el tratamiento apropiado
durante su transporte. Si por alguna circunstancia, es necesario hacer los
montajes en el lugar donde se realiza la encuesta, es aconsejable que estos se
hagan pegando los mosquitos con cemento ''Ambroid" a triangulitos de cartu-
lina fuerte, colocandolos del lado derecho y con las patas en direccion hacia
la parte interior de los mismos. Los triangulitos deben fijarse en alfileres
tipo #3 con cabeza de nylon.
El método mas practico para tratar los adultos, es preservarlos y alma-
cenarlos en cajitas plasticas para transportarlos y montarlos posteriormente
(para las excepciones véase la seccion ADULTOS EN ALCOHOL). Cajitas
plasticas de diferentes tipos se han usado satisfactoriamente; pero con el
objeto de mantener uniformidad se recomienda el uso de cajitas plasticas en
las que se empacan pildoras. Para protejer y mantener los mosquitos dentro
de las cajitas plasticas es preferible usar algod6n laminado ("'cellucotton")
oO papel toalla en lugar de usar algod6on no absorbente, y los mismos se deben
cortar en cuadros de la misma medida del interior de las cajitas. Con estas
cajitas no eS necesario el uso de preservativos contra el moho; pero si por
alguna razon tienen que usarse, se sugiere pegar con goma al fondo de la caji-
ta no mas de 1 o 2 pequefios cristales de timol, NUNCA DEBEN DEJARSE
CRISTALES O ESCAMAS DE NINGUNA CLASE EN LAS CAJITAS, pues existe
el peligro que se dafien los especimenes. Algunas veces los mosquitos son
atraidos hacia las paredes de las cajitas debido a la electricidad estatica,
para eliminar este problema, constltese en el GLOSARIO el aparte ELEC TRI-
CIDAD ESTATICA.
El procedimiento a seguir, para el arreglo de los mosquitos en las cajitas
plasticas es el siguiente: Coloque dentro de la cajita un cuadro de papel toalla.
Luego, usando pinzas entomologicas, saque los mosquitos de la taza plastica
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 67
y coldquelos en una hoja de papel antes de introducirlos en la cajita. A con-
tinuacion, Ordene una camada de mosquitos encima del cuadro de papel enla
cajita, de tal forma que los especimenes tengan las patas estiradas, las alas
dobladas sobre el abdomen y espacio suficiente entre los mismos para que no
se toquen. Nunca ponga los mosquitos en masa dentro de la caja. Sobre la
primera camada se coloca otro cuadrado de papel y luego otra camada de mos-
quitos y asi sucesivamente, hasta que todos los especimenes de una coleccion
se hayan ordenado o hasta que la ultima camada alcance el borde superior de
la cajita. Finalmente, se pone un cuadrado de papel y encima de él una mota
de algodon escarmenado que debe extenderse uniformemente sobre toda la
superficie del papel y que sobresalga ligeramente, por encima del borde de
la cajita, de tal manera, que cuando se le ponga la tapa, el algodon escasa-
mente alcance a tocarla. La etiqueta correspondiente se coloca encima del
algodon, antes de proceder a cerrar la cajita. Bajo ninguna circunstancia debe
ejercerse presion alguna al colocar los especimenes, el papel o el algodon,
ya que ello traeria como consecuencia, el aplastamiento de los mosquitos. Las
capas de papel y el algodon, se usan para evitar que los ejemplares se muevan.
Si esta operacion se realiza en el campo, las cajitas se deben sellar con una
cinta papel transparente engomado ("scotch tape'') o con esparadrapo para evi-
tar que puedan abrirse durante el transporte; en cambio, en el laboratorio ello
no es necesario.
Para una coleccion se deben usar tantas cajitas como sea necesario, y cada
una debe estar debidamente rotulada con su correspondiente numero de colec-
cion. No es aconsejable poner mas de una coleccion dentro de una misma ca-
jita, pero si hay necesidad de hacerlo, como sucede cuando hay muchas colec-
ciones con pocos ejemplares, la etiqueta se coloca sobre el ultimo cuadrado de
papel y se le tapa con otro sobre el cual se empieza a colocar los especimenes
de la otra coleccion.
Las cajitas plasticas deben guardarse en un lugar seco y libre de plagas.
Para instrucciones mas precisas al respecto, véase el capitulo siguiente.
ADULTOS EN ALCOHOL. En el caso de mosquitos con el cuerpo blando,
especialmente "'dixa-midges, '' es preferible preservarlos en alcohol al 80%,
que guardarlos en cajitas plasticas. Los especimenes provenientes de colec-
ciones en el campo, de crias masivas o de crias individuales, se les mata y
uno a uno Se dejan caer de cabeza en una carpula de vidrio con alcohol. Para
cada cria individual, para cada lote y para cada sublote, se usa una carpula
diferente. No se deben poner mas de 10 especimenes en un solo carpula, y
dentro de este, se debe introducir un tapon de algodon que debe quedar inmerso
en el alcohol, pero sin tocar los ejemplares. la etiqueta se coloca encima
del algodon y la carpula se cierra con un tapon de neopreno. El registro de
este material en la tarjeta de coleccion, se hace de la manera que se describe
al final de la secci6n ADULTOS CRIADOS.
Tambien deben preservarse en alcohol aquellos ejemplares provenientes
de crias masivas que no se hayan quitinizado completamente, o estén mori-
bundos o dafnados.
ADULTOS CRIADOS. Todos los adultos obtenidos en las crias, después
que se les haya mantenido por 24 o 48 horas en recipientes o jaulas (véase
RECIPIENTES Y JAULAS PARA EL MANTENIMIENTO DE ADULTOS), deben
matarseles y tratarseles como se indica mas adelante. Las hembras que se
usaron para obtener huevos, se deben procesar inmediatamente después de la
postura, de acuerdo con el procedimiento para la cria de individuos, que se
68 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
describe de inmediato.
Crias individuales. Todos los adultos provenientes de las crias individua-
les y mantenidos por el periodo de tiempo requierido (de 24 a 48 horas) se les
debe procesar todos juntos durante la tarde o la noche. El proceso se acelera
si se usa una serie de 2 a 5 tubos para matar. la tapa del recipiente de man-
tenimiento se afloja; el recipiente se voltea boca abajo sobre la boca del tubo,
para matar al mismo tiempo que se desliza la tapa; de esta manera el cloro-
formo anestesiara al mosquito y alos pocos segundos caera dentro del tubo
para matar; si se golpea ligeramente a las paredes del recipiente superior,
mas rapidamente se producira la caida. Retire entonces, el recipiente de
mantenimiento y tape con el pulgar el tubo con cloroformo, hasta que el mos-
quito deje de moverse, pongale dentro la etiqueta correspondiente, tapelo y
col6quelo aparte. Proceda de la misma manera con otros adultos (de uno a
cinco dependiendo del numero de tubos que se tengan) y ponga los tubos en fila.
Una vez que todos los tubos estén ocupados, se comienza con el primer tubo,
la segunda operacion del proceso, la cual se describe mas adelante. Comple-
tada esta ultima, el tubo vacio se usa para matar otro ejemplar y se ponea
continuacion de los otros. la operacion se repite hasta que se hayan tratados
todos los adultos. Todo el procedimiento debe cronometrarse en tal forma,
que los mosquitos no permanezcan menos de 5 minutos, ni mas de 10, en el
tubo con cloroformo.
El segundo paso del proceso consiste en sacar el adulto y su etiqueta del
tubo para matar y colocarlo sobre una tarjeta blanca, de esta el adulto se to-
ma por las patas con unas pinzas entomologicas y se deja caer de cabeza en
la porci6n mas larga de una capsula de gelatina. Si el mosquito cabe comoda-
mente en la capsula, golpee ligeramente el fondo de la misma y coloque dentro
de ella un pequefio tapon de algodon escarmenado para de este modo fijar el
mosquito. El algod6n no debe tocar el espécimen ni tampoco sobresalir del
borde de la capsula. La etiqueta se coloca en la parte exterior de la porcion
mas larga de la capsula, de manera que al cerrar la capsula con la porcion
mas pequefia, la misma queda aprisionada entre las dos partes.
En caso de que el mosquito Sea muy grande y no cabe holgadamente den-
tro de la capsula o si la humedad es excesiva y la misma no se puede utilizar,
entonces debe usarse una cajita plastica para guardar el espéecimen. Para
esto coloque un cuadrado de papel toalla en al fondo de la cajita, y transfiera
el especimen dentro de ella. Si se encuentran dificultades debido a que el
especimen se escurre contra las paredes de la cajita debido a la ELECTRI-
CIDAD ESTATICA, entonces siga las instrucciones sobre el particular en el
GLOSARIO. Después que se ha colocado el espécimen apropiadamente, colo-
que suavemente otro cuadrado de papel por encima del mismo y de igual ma-
nera coloque un pedacito de algodon escarmenado encima del papel, para en
esta forma rellenar la cajita completamente. Como parte final de la opera-
cidn, coloque la etiqueta correspondiente encima del algodon y proceda a ce-
rrar la cajita adecuadamente. Algunas veces el cuadrado de papel que va en
el fondo de la cajita puede Suprimirse para hacer el ejemplar visible desde
afuera, pero siempre el mosquito debe protegerse del algodon con el cuadra-
do de papel intermedio.
Cuando todos los especimenes se hayan procesado, se hace el registro en
la tarjeta de colecciOn, poniendo una marca (V) en la columna apropiada, en-
frente del numero correspondiente, tanto para machos (co), como para hem-
bras (2). Si el sexo no se puede determinar en el momento, la marca (VY) se
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 69
coloca en la lfnea entre las dos columnas. Si se escapa algun ejemplar debe
hacerse lo posible por recapturarlo, y en caso de que exista duda, de que el
espécimen capturado sea el mismo que escapo, se debe hacer constar esto en
OBSERVACIONES. Si se pierde, se coloca un 0 enla linea entre las colum-
nas... ¥. +.
Carpulas de vidrio de las usadas para preservar el material en alcohol u
otras de un diametro moderado (hasta 12 mm) pueden usarse en lugar de las
capsulas de gelatina o cajitas plasticas. Los mosquitos se dejan caer de cabe-
za dentro de estos recipientes, luego, se les pone un tapon de algodon que se
introduce hasta que alcance por encima de las patas del animal y por ultimo se
la pone la etiqueta y se tapan.
Las capsulas de gelatina son solubles en el agua y por lo tanto se les debe
guardar en donde no les puede caer agua y la humedad no sea excesiva. En el
capitulo proximo se dan las instrucciones para almacenar y transportar las
capsulas de gelatina, cajitas plasticas, frasquitos y carpulas de vidrio.
Crias Masivas. Todos los ejemplares provenientes de una cria masiva y
que se han mantenido durante el tiempo requerido (24 o 48 horas) deben pro-
cesarse todos juntos (marcados con un numero de coleccion o en numero de
coleccion y de sublote de un digito). Silos especimenes estan en frasquitos
se usan tubos para matar en la forma descrita en la seccion anterior, Crias
Individuales. Silos recipientes contienen mas de un adulto, es preferible sol-
tarlos todos en una red y recogerlos con un aspirador o un tubo para matar.
Los ejemplares que estén en jaulas hechas con tazas plasticas se sacan, uno a
uno o unos pocos a la vez, con un aspirador y se les pasa a un tubo para matar,
soplando suavemente en el aspirador.
Todos los adultos de un lote o de un sublote se procesan juntos y debe ase-
gurarse de que todos los tubos para matar tienen la etiqueta correspondiente.
Si es necesario, se deben hacer etiquetas nuevas. Después que todos los espe-
cimenes se hayan matado, se les coloca en cajitas plasticas siguiendo el pro-
cedimiento descrito en ADULTOS COLECCIONADOS EN EL CAMPO. Si hay
un solo espécimen en un lote o sublote dado, el mismo se puede poner en una
cajita plastica pequefia siguiendo el procedimiento descrito en Crias Individua-
les en la seccion anterior.
Completado el proceso para todos y cada uno de los especimenes, se hace
el registro de los mismos en la seccion SUBLOTES de la tarjeta de coleccion,
marcando (Vv) en la columna apropiada: (co) para machos, (?) para hembras o
ambos enfrente del numero de sublote correspondiente. Si el sexo no Se puede
determinar con seguridad, la marca se pone en la linea entre las dos columnas
(como se indic6 en el caso de Crias Individuales). En el caso de colecciones
no subdivididas en sublotes se usa la linea correspondiente al sublote -1. El
material se almacena y empaca de acuerdo a las instrucciones que se dan en
proximo capitulo.
LARVAS Y PUPAS. Es necesario preservar una muestra adecuada de
larvas y pupas de cada coleccién de campo y de las crias de progenies (las ins-
trucciones para seleccionar este material fueron dadas en el capitulo TRATA-
MIENTO DE LAS COLECCIONES Y SELECCION, CRIA DE PROGENIES, IN-
CUBACION DE HUEVOS y CRIA DE MATERIAL SECO). También es recomen-
dable preservar pupas si hay material disponsible, y el tiempo lo permite. A
objeto de que las pupas y larvas puedan utilizarse para estudios taxonomicos,
se les debe matar y preservar debidamente, de tal manera, que la forma del
cuerpo y todas sus estructuras, particularmente los pelos y cerdas, sean
70 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
retenidos integramente. Aun cuando es posible obtener un buen material ma-
tando las larvas y pupas directamente en el alcohol en el que se les va a preser-
var, es un método que no ofrece suficiente seguridad y solo debe emplearsele,
cuando no se dispone de las facilidades o el tiempo necesarios para seguir la
técnica descrita mas adelante.
Las larvas y pupas que se van a preservar y que han sido separadas en
una taza plastica marcada con el numero de coleccion y de sublote, se trans-
fieren con una pipeta a una bandeja de separacion con agua limpia, para lavar-
las. Cuando se tienen pocas larvas se puede seguir el siguiente procedimien-
to: si hay muchos restos y sedimentos en el recipiente, se hacen una serie de
transferencias sucesivas hasta eliminarlos; luego, se calienta agua a 60°C
(140°F) en un vaso quimico u otro recipiente adecuado y se le hechan las lar-
vas, unaalavez. Tan pronto como las larvas floten se les transfiere, una a
una, con una pipeta a un recipiente con alcohol al 80%. Después de 5 minu-
tos se les transfiere a un frasquito 0 cajita plastica con alcohol al 80%. El
tamafio de estos recipientes dependera del numero de larvas, pero en todo
caso, deben ser lo suficientemente grandes como para que quepan todas las
larvas, en una Sola capa, en el fondo. Dentro del recipiente se coloca una eti-
queta de papel con los datos pertinentes escritos a lapiz y después se le cierra
adecuadamente. Las larvas deben dejarse endurecer por lo menos durante toda
la noche, antes de pasarlas a las carpulas de vidrio.
Si los estadios juveniles que se van a preservar son mas de 20, estos de-
ben lavar como se indico anteriormente y luego se pueden vertir en un pequefio
cedazo de nylon, el cual se sumerge en un recipiente con agua caliente hasta
que todas las larvas hayan muerto. Después de esto, el cedazo con las larvas
se pasa a otro recipiente con alcohol etilico al 80%, una vez que se coloca
el cedazo en el recipiente, se invierte y se procede a lavar las larvas. Final-
mente, las larvas se transfieren con una pipeta a una cajita plastica que con-
tenga alcohol a la misma concentracion y se dejan en ella con el proposito de
que se endurezcan.
Después del periodo de endurecimiento (toda la noche o mas), el alcohol se
reemplaza por otro de la misma concentracion; las larvas se transfieren con
una pipeta a una carpula de vidrio con alcohol etilico al 80%. En estas car-
pulas no se deben poner mas de 20 larvas de tamafio mediano (como las de C.
quinquefasciatus). Silas larvas no se van al fondo de inmediato, las paredes
del recipiente se golpean ligeramente con un lapiz, hasta que esto suceda.
Cumplido esto se sumerge un tapon de algodon en el alcohol y se coloca a un ni-
vel inmediatamente superior a las larvas pero sin tocarlas. El tapon debe ha-
cerse con una base lisa y arreglado en tal forma de manera que pueda entrar
facilmente, ya que nunca debe usarse uno que por su tamafio tenga que ser in-
troducido con gran presion. La etiqueta se pone encima del tapon y se le vierte
mas alcohol, hasta una altura cerca del borde de la carpula; luego se le pone
un tapon de neopreno y para permitir el escape de la presion se introduce un a-
guja de diseccion entre la tapa y la pared del recipiente.
Una vez que todo el material se ha procesado, se hacen los registros per-
tinentes en la tarjeta de coleccién, en la seccion correspondiente alos sublo-
tes. Se pone una marca (VY) en la columna L (larva) y/o enla P (pupa), enla
linea correspondiente al nimero de sublote; si solo hay un numero de lote en
la etiqueta, se utiliza la linea para el sublote -1. Luego se empaca y almace-
na en la forma como se instruye en el proximo capitulo.
MUDAS. Para los fines de estudios taxonomicos, el material mas valioso
lo constituyen las mudas de las larvas y pupas y los correspondientes adultos
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 71
obtenidos de las crias individuales; por lo tanto, el procesamiento de estos se
debe hacer lo mas cuidadosamente posible. Cuando se hacen muchas crias
maSsivas y de progenies a un mismo tiempo, no se debe intentar preservar las
mudas de las larvas y las de las correspondientes pupas en un mismo recipien-
te. Sin embargo, cuando las crias son pocas, las mudas de larvas y pupas
pueden ponerse en una misma carpula, como se indico en la seccion RECIPIEN-
TES PARA LA CRIA DE PUPAS en el capitulo anterior.
Las mudas de larvas -y pupas que han sido separadas para preservarlas en
frasquitos plastico individuales con alcohol diluido (véase la secci6n RECI-
PIENTES PARA LA CRIA DE LARVAS y JAULAS PARA LA EMERGENCIA DE
ADULTOS en el capitulo anterior), se deben procesar el mismo dia y preferi-
blemente, inmediatamente después, que se termine el trabajo de las crias in-
dividuales; para ello se vierte el contenido de un frasquito, incluyendo se eti-
queta, en una cajita plastica con alcohol etilico al 80%, colocada sobre una
superficie blanca y con una pipeta se transfiere la muda a una carpula de vi-
drio también con alcohol etilico al 80%. Si aquella no se va al fondo, se
tapa la carpula con el pulgar y se le invierte repetidas veces hasta que la muda
se humedezca y se hunda; luego, como se indico en la seccion LARVAS Y PU-
PAS, se introduce un tapon de algodon, teniendo cuidado que la muda no se
pegue al algodon o quede aprisionada entre éste y la pared del recipiente.
Finalmente, se coloca la etiqueta y se tapa la carpula, liberando la presion en
la forma que se indicé en la seccion LARVAS Y PUPAS. Las mudas pueden tam-
bien transferirse con un "'elevador' de superficie lisa; pero como esto re-
quiere mucha pericia no se recomienda su uso general por asistentes poco ex-
perimentados.
Una vez que todas las mudas han sido procesadas, se registran en la tar-
jeta de coleccio6n, poniendo una marca (V) en la columna 1 (mudas de larvas) o
p (mudas de pupas) en la linea correspondiente al numero de la cria individual.
El material se almacena y empaca en la forma como se indica en el proximo
capitulo.
CRIAS INCOMPLETAS. Todos los especimenes que mueren durante el
proceso de crianza en el laboratorio, ya sean de las crias masivas de un lote,
de un sublote o de crias individuales, deben preservarse con el mismo cuidado
que el resto del material; ademas todas las mudas de crias masivas (lotes
y sublotes) también deben preservarse.
Cuando se completan las crias de lotes y sublotes, los frasquitos plasticos
con las mudas de larvas y larvas y pupas muertas, se procesan en la forma que
se describe a continuacioOn. Se vacia el frasquito en una cubeta o bandeja (o en
un recipiente mas pequefio) con alcohol etilico al 80 %; desde alli se transfieren
las mudas (de larvas y pupas) a una carpula de vidrio con alcohol etilico al 80%
y las larvas y pupas a otro, siguiendo el procedimiento descrito anteriormente,
en la seccion LARVAS Y PUPAS y MUDAS. No se deben poner mas de 20 ejem-
plares en un mismo frasquito y todo debe estar debidamente rotulado. El re-
gistro del material en la tarjeta de colecci6n se hace de acuerdo con las indi-
caciones previstas en la seccion LARVAS Y PUPAS.
Todo el material proveniente de crias individuales incompletas debe pre-
servarse en carpulas de vidrio individuales con alcohol etilico al 80%. Las
larvas muertas se pueden transferir directamente a las carpulas de vidrio,
pero las que estén moribundas deben matarse en agua caliente, siguiendo el
procedimiento descrito en la seccion LARVAS Y PUPAS, luego se pasan por
alcohol etilico al 80% pero sin someterlas al proceso de endurecimiento y
por ultimo se transfieren a una carpula de vidrio que contenga alcohol etilico
72 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
a la misma concentracion.
HUEVOS. Siempre debe preservarse una muestra de los huevos provenien-
tes de las crias de progenies y de las incubaciones, y cuando sea posible
de los que se encuentran en las muestras de material seco (véase el capitulo an-
terior). Una muestra de 5 a 10 huevos es suficiente; pero si la postura es
grande 0 si son muchos los coleccionados en el campo, debe conservarse un
numero mayor. Es muy poco todavia, lo que se conoce acerca de los huevos
de mosquitos, debido, a que se omite el coleccionarlos y preservarlos; por lo
tanto debe ponerse todo el empefio posible en coleccionarlos y, también, por-
que ellos muestran caracteristicas taxonomicas de gran valor.
Los huevos de la mayoria de las especies pueden preservarse en solucion
de formol al 10% (4% de formaldehido); pero para huevos mas delicados como
los anofelinos, es aconsejable usar una solucion al5%. Los recipientes para
conservar los huevos pueden ser pequefias carpulas de vidrio con tapas de neo-
preno.
Las masas de huevos flotantes y los de envoltura dura como los aedinos,
se ponen directamente en carpulas de vidrio con formol. Para transferir los
huevos desde el agua, papel toalla, algodon, o de cualquier otra superficie don-
de hayan sido depositados se usa un pincel de pelo de camello. En el caso de
especies de Mansonia que fijan sus huevos a varios objetos, estos se transfieren
junto con todo o parte del material al cual estan fijos. Una vez que los huevos
se depositen en el fondo de la carpula se introduce un tapon de algodon (en la
misma forma que se hace para las larvas y pupas), luego la etiqueta y por ul-
timo se tapa el recipiente teniendo el cuidado de liberar la presion de la ma-
nera antes descrita.
Los huevos mas delicados, con flotadores u otros procesos (como los de
anofelinos) deben matarse y preservarse en vapores de formol; para ello se
procede de la manera siguiente: Primero, se coloca la etiqueta con la parte
escrita mirando hacia la hacia las paredes del recipiente, y de inmediato se
desliza hasta el fondo del mismo. Luego se introduce un tapon de algodon ab-
sorbente, el cual debe quedar en forma ajustada en la parte posterior de la
etiqueta y a una altura de 1 cm (aproximadamente media pulgada) del fondo.
A continuacio6n, se satura el algodon con formalina al 5% hasta obtener una
fina pelicula del liquido en la superficie del mismo. Como segunda parte del
proceso se prepara una tirilla de papel de filtro o papel toalla, lo suficiente-
mente angosta para deslizarla dentro de la capsula y con un largo de unos 5
cm (unas 2 pulgadas). La tirilla se humedece con formalina al 5% y luego
con un pincel de pelo de camello se transfieren, uno a uno, los huevos al cen-
tro dela misma. El tercer punto, consiste en doblar un extremo de la tirilla
(no debe tener huevos) dos o tres veces, de tal manera que el largo de la par-
te doblada debe ser menor que el diametro del frasquito. Una vez hecho esto
se introduce la tirilla por la parte doblada dentro del recipiente y al hacer con-
tacto con el algodén se hace un poco de presion sobre el mismo al tiempo que
el resto de la tirilla se pega contra la pared del frasquito en donde se man-
tendra por efectos de la humedad presente. Como cuarto y ultimo punto, el
frasquito se cierra con un tapon de neopreno en la forma usual. NO LLENE
LA CARPULA CON FORMOL; bastan los vapores para matar y preservar los
huevos.
Después que todos los huevos han sido procesados en la forma antes des-
crita, se pasa entonces a hacer los registros correspondientes en la tarjeta
de coleccion, los cuales se incluyen seccion SUBLOTES, para ello coloque una
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 73
marca (Vv) en la columna bajo la H (huevos), en la linea correspondiente al
numero del sublote. Si se trata del numero del lote solamente, se usa entonces
la linea para el sublote -1. El material se empaca y almacena de acuerdo a
las instrucciones que se dan en el siguiente capitulo.
EMBALAJE, ALMACENAJE Y TRANSPORTE
ALMACENAJE. Todos los adultos preservados, los materiales y utiles
usados en su procesamiento deben almacenarse en una cajao gabinete seco y
a prueba de plagas, para protegerlos de hongos, hormigas y especialmente
psocidos. Un armario de madera con agujeros para ventilacién, de la parte
superior, con un bombillo de bajo voltaje (7, 5, o 15 watts) en el fondo, para
mantener seco el ambiente y con las patas dentro de tarros o potes con aceite,
llena los requerimientos indicados. La temperatura dentro del gabinete no
debe exceder a los 40 C (104 F). En caso de que se observen psocidos se de-
be aplicar liberalmente ''Dri-Die” o naftalina en escamas, como también se
puede colocar una pequefia caja destapada que contenga cristales de timol. No
se deben utilizar insecticidas tales como DDT y BHC. Si no hay un gabinete a
prueba de humedad se deben utilizar pequefias bolsitas con silica para almace-
nar el material.
Las capsulas de gelatina con adultos, se almacenan en las mismas cajas de
carton en que vienen embaladas, agregandoles encima una capa de algodon es-
carmenado con el proposito de evitar su movimiento. No se debe ejercer pre-
sion alguna cuando se cierre la caja, pues existe el peligro de quebrar las
capsulas. Las capsulas vacias deben almacenarse en un gabinete secador.
Las cajitas plasticas con los adultos es conveniente empacarlas en cajas de
un tamano apropiado y cualquier espacio que quede entre las cajitas y la pa-
redes de la caja de carton deben rellenarse con algodén escarmenado o papel
aovillado, para evitar el movimiento de las mismas. Las cajitas plasticas
vacias deben mantenerse cerradas y guardadas en el gabinete secador. El pa-
pel toalla, higiénico, los cuadrados de papel para las cajitas plasticas, asi
como la tela de nylon también se guardan en el gabinete secador.
Las carpulas de vidrio que contienen los especimenes y todos los otros
recipientes de vidrio con alcohol etilico, se almacenan en un lugar fresco, nun-
ca enel gabinete secador y se empacan en cajas de carton o se envuelven en
papel toalla en grupos de 20 a 50. Los frasquitos plasticos con alcohol se deben
sellar con cintas papel transparente engomado o esparadrapo para evitar la
evaporaciOn y se empacan en cajas de cartén pequefias.
EMBALAJE Y DESPACHO. El material debe enviarse tan pronto como
sea posible para su procesamiento final y montaje. Es mas conveniente en-
viar pequenos pequetes cada vez, que dejar que se acumule una gran canti-
dad. la tarjeta de colecciOn debe incluirse junto con los especimenes y.la
letra de codigo debe indicarse claramente.
Eis muy importante que el material se embale cuidadosamente pues de otra
manera se corre el riesgo de que Se arruine gran parte del mismo. El emba-
laje debe hacerse en cajas de carton corrugado, interiormente forradas con
laminas de espuma plastica (styrofoam). Todo el material que va ser enviado de-
be primero embalarse cuidadosamente en pequefias cajetas de carton siguiendo
las indicaciones que se dan a continuaciOn. En primer lugar, las cajas deben
examinarse, para ver si hay espacio libre debido a la falta de recipientes que
74 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
se puedan haber perdido, dichos espacios se deben rellenar con algodon o pa-
pel aovillado para en esta forma evitar todo movimiento en el interior de las
cajetas, pero evitando igualmente que el material quede extremadamente
ajustado. Luego se sellan las cajetas con cintas de papel engomado y se colo-
can en la caja que se van a enviar. Los espacios vacios dentro de la caja se
rellenan con papel o paja de embalar. Suficiente material de relleno debe
ponerse en la parte superior de la misma, de tal forma que al taparla haya
que hacer cierta presion para que la tapa llegue a su lugar. La tapa debe se-
llarse con papel engomado y la caja debe cubrirse con papel de envolver.
Si se van a enviar especimenes montados en cajas "Schmitt"’ o de otro
tipo, éstas deben embalarse en cajas de carton corrugado forradas interior-
mente con laminas de 2 pulgadas de ancho de esponja plastica (poliuretano).
Los alfileres deben estar muy bien asegurados a la caja y ésta no debe conte-
ner cristales 0 escamas de ningtn material fumigante. Silos ejemplares es-
tan montado en triangulitos de papel muy largos, se deben poner alfileres a ca-
da lado de todas las puntas, para evitar que aquellos se doblen 0 se muevan mu-
cho y pueda, por lo tanto, dafiarse el mosquito.
Si no se dispone de cajas especiales para el embalaje, se puede usar cual-
quier caja de carton corrugado, fuertemente forrada por todos los lados in-
teriores una capa de unas dos pulgadas de espesor de papel aovillado u otro
material de embalaje. Dentro de esta caja se coloca una mas pequefia, debi-
damente sellada, que contiene el material empacado como se describio antes.
Nunca se deben usar cajas de paredes deébiles y el material de embalaje debe
aplicarse liberalmente, pues solo asi se disminuye el riesgo de que el paquete
y su contenido se aplaste.
Todos los paquetes deben enviarse por via aérea, preferiblemente como
servicio de paquetes postales. En caso de que se vayan a hacer varios envios
a la vez, su despacho como carga aérea resulta mas economico; pero como es-
to puede requerir una serie de tramites de aduana y ante otras oficinas guber-
namentales, puede resultar que en Ultimo analisis el resultado sea mas oneroso.
Todos los paquetes deben llevar claramente marcado el destinatario y su direc-
cidn, asi como el remitente y la inscripcion siguiente: "Material preservado
para estudio cientifico. Sin valor comercial."
ESQUEMA DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS
El esquema que sigue y que recoge los procedimientos descritos en el pre-
sente trabajo, para el tratamiento de material de mosquitos desde que se le
captura hasta que se le mata y preserva, no incluye los detalles envueltos en
las operaciones de muerte y preservacion; pues el proposito que se persigue
es presentar una perspectiva general de los procedimientos y no una guia sis-
tematica de los mismos. Los [corchetes] indican que la operacion es opcional,
pero deben ponerse en practica siempre que sea posible.
Coleccion de Adultos
Para matarlos inmediatamente después de la captura:
Tubo o frasco para matar (campo) |
Coldquelos en una taza o frasquito plastico con papel higiénico (campo)
Consérvelos en cajitas plasticas (la mayoria de los mosquitos) (labora-
torio)
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 75
Presérvelos en alcohol (mosquitos de cuerpo blando, hembras gravidas
que no se dejan para postura) (laboratorio)
Hembras que se dejan para la cria de progenies:
Coldquelas en recipientes para postura (campo)
Transfiéralas a jaulas para postura (laboratorio)
Hembras gravidas: solucion de azucar
Hembras no gravidas: soluciOn de azucar, alimentacion diaria con sangre
Cria de progenies
Preserve de 5 a 10 huevos en formalina o vapores de la misma.
Transfiera el resto de los huevos a un recipiente apropiado para el naci-
miento de las larvas
Sométalos a desecacion e hidratacion las veces que sea necesario
Crias masivas en tazas plasticas: alimentacion con polvo de bizcocho
Preserve las mudas y de 5 a 10 especimenes de cada instar
Preserve los adultos en cajitas plasticas
[Aislense 10 larvas en el cuarto instar para criarlas
Preserve las mudas de cada cria individual
Preserve los adultos en capsulas de gelatina o en cajitas plasticas|
Coleccion de Pupas
No separadas por especies:
Aisle hasta 15 en frasquitos individuales para su cria (preferiblemente en
el campo)
Separe otras 50 para su cria masiva
Preserve en alcohol las mudas, pupas muertas y adultos no viables
Conserve los adultos en cajitas plasticas
Preserve las pupas restantes
[Las seleccionadas por especies:
Aisle la mitad o hasta 10 de cada especie en frasquitos para crias indivi-
duales
Preserve los adultos en capsulas de gelatina o en cajitas plasticas
La mitad se utiliza para cria masiva y la mitad restante se preserva (en
alcohol)
Preserve los adultos en cajitas plasticas|
Coleccion de Larvas
Separelas por especies y pongalas en recipientes separados (si es posible en el
campo; complétese en el laboratorio)
Asigne los sublotes y trate cada uno como sigue:
Aisle la mitad o hasta 10 larvas en el cuarto instar en frasquitos indivi-
duales para su crianza (en el campo si es posible; se termina en el
laboratorio)
Crielas hasta que nazca el adulto
Preserve todas las mudas y las larvas y adultos no viables en alcohol
Preserve los adultos en capsulas de gelatina o en cajitas plasticas
Preserve 20 larvas adicionales del cuarto instar en alcohol
El resto de las larvas en el cuarto instar se crian masivamente
Siga el procedimiento especial para las formas carnivoras
[Preserve hasta 10 pupas en alcohol |
76 Contrib. Amer. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
Crie las restantes hasta el estado adulto, preserve las mudas
Preserve los adultos en cajitas
Larvas jOvenes que no se han podido separar por especies
Crie las formas no carnivoras en el recipiente original hasta que al-
cancen el cuarto instar, luego proceda como se indico anterior -
mente
Crie las formas que se sospechen sean carnivoras en recipientes
separados
Coleccion de Huevos
Coleccionados y puestos en frasquitos plasticos (campo)
Transfiéralos al recipiente apropiado para incubarlos (laboratorio)
Coleccionados en y junto con material seco (campo)
Transfiéralos a una taza plastica, pongales agua y una tableta de vitamina
C (laboratorio)
Sométalos a desecacion e hidrataciones sucesivas, varias veces (labora-
torio)
Crie las larvas hasta la forma adulta siguiendo el procedimiento descrito en
Coleccion de larvas
GLOSARIO
Lo que sigue es una lista en orden alfabetico del equipo y utiles que se
usan en las investigaciones de mosquitos, asi como también, algunas explica-
ciones de términos especiales y problemas mencionados en el trabajo. No se
ha tenido la intencidn de que la lista sea exhaustiva. En publicaciones tales
como: Belkin (1962: 67-82), Carpenter y La Casse (1955: 3-5), Forattini
(1962: 185-302, 593-642), Horsfall (1955), Howard, Dyar y Knab (1913: 106-
185), King et al (1960: 11-17, 23-28), Matheson (1944: 80-86), Russell et al
(1963: 283-361) y Trembley (1955), asi como tambien en las referencias espe-
cificas que se dan en el texto, se encuentra mucha informacion referente a e-
quipo, métodos de coleccion y de cria y de habitat de mosquitos. De nuevo que-
remos insistir que los métodos existentes deben adaptarse a las condiciones lo-
cales y que técnicas nuevas deben ensayarse. :
Para el proposito de las referencias en esta traduccion al Espafiol los
equivalentes en Inglés se presentan en su correspondiente orden alfabético y
también se incluyen a continuacion de los término en Espajfiol.
La mencion de ciertos productos, casas manufactureras y distribuidores
no quiere decir que los mismos sean especificos, productos similares e igual-
mente satisfactorios pueden encontrarse en otras partes.
Aerial net-RED ENTOMOLOGICA
ALGODON (Cotton, cotton wool). Se debe usar algodon absorbente, es-
téril de la mejor clase. Si esta muy compacto, se le debe escarmenar antes
de usarlo en los frasquitos, carpulas y cajitas plasticas. Motas o bolas de al-
godon empacadas en bolsas plasticas son tambien convenientes, pero por lo
regular estan demasiado compactas para ser usadas directamente. |
ALGODON EN LAMINAS (Cellucotton). Cualquier clase de algodon absor-
bente empacado en laminas, livianas y con superficies lisas, puede usarse
para proteger y preservar mosquitos en las cajitas plasticas. Si no se encuen-
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar UE
tra el tipo usado en Entomologia, las motas o tapones para cirugia y trabajos
dentales, prestan igual servicio. Sele debe cortar en pequefias laminas cua-
dradas que quepan exactamente dentro de las cajitas plasticas para evitar que
los especimenes se trasloquen. Debe almacenarsele en un lugar seco, libre de
hongos, preferiblemente dentro de bolsas plasticas con "silica gel."
ALIMENTOS PARA LARVAS (Larval food). Las crias individuales y ma-
Sivas de larvas en el Ultimo instar coleccionadas en el campo, no requieren
mas alimento que el presente en el agua en la cual fueron coleccionadas y en
el concentrado obtenido. Sin embargo, las crias masivas de progenies y de
estadios juveniles coleccionados en el campo es necesario alimentarlas con
regularidad, de preferencia afiadiendo una pequefia cantidad del alimento dos
veces al dia. El bicozcho para perros, "laboratory chow” u otros alimentos
secos para perro, finamente molidos, pueden servir para este fin. Para las
larvas que se alimentan en la superficie, el alimento debe espolvorearse so-
bre la superficie; para las que se alimentan en el fondo, se prepara una mezcla
con agua y alimento y luego se le coloca con un gotero en el fondo del recipien-
te. También se pueden usar pequefias cantidades de levadura como se especi-
fica en el texto. Hemos encontrado que polen seco o vivo de varias flores y
gramineas son un alimento muy efectivo para formas dificiles de criar que vi-
ven en charcos temporales y en partes de plantas donde se almacena el agua.
ALTIMETRO (Altimeter). El altfmetro de compensacioOn manual manu-
facturado por Lufft Instruments y distribuidos por Watrous & Co., Inc.,
110 East 23rd St., N.Y. 10010, es muy conveniente para llevarlo al campo. Se
prefiere el modelo con la escala métrica.
AMBROID. Es un cemento liquido, comercial, manufacturado por Ambroid
Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts. Es un excelente material para pegar los
mosquitos adultos a los triangulitos de cartulina. El solvente de este material
es acetona, la cual se deja evaporar y se reemplaza por acetato de etilo antes
de usar el cemento.
Aquatic net-RED ACUATICA
ASPIRADOR (TUBO DE SUCCION) (Aspirator, suction tube). Aspiradores
cé6modos y practicos pueden hacerse usando tubos de plasticos acrilicos de
12.5 mm O.D. de mas o menos 30 cm de longitud, provistos de un tapon de
caucho horadado de 9 mm O.D. o un pedazo de tubo plastico cubierto con una
malla fina de nylon (véase tejidos de nylon) y un tubo de caucho corriente de
60 cm de longitud y 12.5 mm O.D. Si se quiere obtener el aspirador con el ex-
tremo ahusado, el tubo plastico se calienta sobre una plancha (no se sobre lla-
ma), luego se estira hasta obtener el didmetro apropiado y se corta en la region
estirada con una cegueta o una lima.
Battery pipette-PIPETA DE BATERIA
BOLSAS PLASTICAS (Plastic bag). Bolsas plasticas de las que se usan
para empaquetar alimentos (12 x 24 pulgadas) son muy convenientes para alma-
cenar muestras de suelo y material varios que contengan huevos.
BOMBA PARA MOSQUITOS (Mosquito pump). Las bombas de fabricacion
casera son muy utiles para coleccionar estadios juveniles en cuevas de cangre-
jo, hueco en los arboles y otros habitats limitados que contienen considerable
cantidad de agua. Hemos encontrado, que los dos tipos que se describen, uno
grande y otro pequefio, dan excelentes resultados. Para cualquiera de los dos
tipos se puede usar una pera de goma con una sola salida o abertura de succion
o compresion (doble accién) y de mas o menos 90 ml (3 oz) de capacidad. Tipo
pequefio: la camara o depdsito de la bomba consiste en una botella de leche
78 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
rectangular de 2 litros (2 quart) de capacidad. La pera de goma se une con un
pequefio pedazo de tubo plastico a un tubo de cobre de 9 mm (3/8 pulgada), el
cual ha sido previamente insertado, cubriéndolo en parte con un pedazo de tubo
de caucho, en un orificio de la dimension apropiada que se ha perforado en la
botella de leche. Un tubo de caucho de 12 a 25 mm (1/4 0 1/2 de pulgada) de
diametro y de 1 a 2 metros (3 a 6 pies) de longitud se acopla a un anillo o sec-
cion de tubo de aluminio, que se fija a la boca de la botella, por medio de un
tapon de goma horadado. Tipo grande: la camara o deposito es una jarrafa
plastica (Jerry can) de 9.5 litros (2.5 galones) de capacidad con un orificio
adicional para ventilacién. La pera de goma se une al orificio de ventilacion
de la jarrafa a través de un tubo de cobre similar al que se describio anterior-
mente, pero el cual no hay necesidad de cubrirlo, para introducirlo al orificio.
El tubo largo se fija como en el caso de la bomba pequefia, a la boca de la ja-
rrafa. Ambas bombas se operan con la pera de goma. Debe tenerse cuidado
de no sobrellenar la camara, ni de que se introduzcan desperdicios dentro de
la pera. Bombas mas pequefias para coleccionar en las axilas de las hojas pue-
den accionarse con la boca.
Cages-J AULAS
CAJITAS PLASTICAS (Pillboxes). Muchos tipos diferentes de cajas, de
carton y de metal se han usado para almacenar y conservar mosquitos; pero
las mas satisfactorias, uniformes, poco costosas y de facil consecucion, son
las de poliestireno, usadas en el comercio para el empaque de pildoras y pas-
tillas y otros productos parecidos. Hemos encontrado, que dos tipos de cajitas
cuadradas, manufacturadas por Bradley Industries, Inc., 1650-58 N. Damen
Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60647, son excelentes para el proposito sefialado.
Ellas son las siguientes: Caja No. 1 (3/4 x 3/4 x 5/8 pulgadas) para adultos
criados individualmente y la caja No. 3 (1 11/16 x 1 11/16 x 9/16 pulgadas)
para adultos obtenidos en las crias masivas. Véase PLASTICOS DE POLIES-
TIRENO para las precauciones que deben observarse con respecto al uso de
varios solventes.
CAPSULAS DE GELATINA (Gelatin capsules). Son excelentes para guar-
dar temporalmente los mosquitos adultos que se obtienen de las crias indivi-
duales. Estas capsulas no deben humedecerse, y por lo tanto se les debe al-
macenar en un lugar fresco y seco, libre de hongos y plagas. Los distribui-
dores farmacéuticos y droguerias en todo el mundo las venden en cajas origi-
nales de 100 unidades. Las No. 1 de Park, Davis, & Co. sirven para guardar
mosquitos de casi todas las tallas, pero es conveniente disponer de otros ta-
mafios, desde la No. 000 (las mas grandes) hasta la No. 5 (las mas pequefias).
Bajo condiciones de mucha humedad no son practicas y se les debe sustituir
por cajitas plasticas.
CARPULA DE VIDRIO (Shell vial, procaine tube or cartridge). Los reci-
pientes mas apropiados para preservar especimenes en alcohol o en formalina
tubitos de vidrio con tapones de neopreno. Estos son mas convenientes que
los tubitos o carpulas de procaine usadas antiguamente. Con el uso del tapon
de neopreno, practicamente no hay evaporacion, permitiendo ello el almacenar
o guardar las carpulas con alcohol en lugares secos. Las carpulas del vidrio
se pueden hacer mediante pedido a cualquier firma comercial de fabricacion
de vidrios, ordenando el uso de tubos de vidrio corriente del modelo No. 2 de
8.75 mm de diametro (8.55-8.95 mm) cortados a un largo de 64mm. Los
tapones de varios tamafios y clases pueden obtenerse de West Company,
Phoenixville, Pennsylvania 19460. Para el diametro antes indicado, se usa
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 719
el tapén para vidrio, diafragma No. 50 No. 6 de neopreno. ha carpula una
vez llena, contendra del fondo hacia arriba, lo siguiente: el espécimen(es), una
motita suave de algodon, la etiqueta y el tapon. Es muy importante al cerrar
la cdrpula, el colocar una aguja de diseccién entre el tapodn y la pared de la
misma, con el proposito de liberar la presion interior y evitar con ello que el
tapoén salte. Una pequefia burbuja de aire puede quedar presente en la region
superior de la carpula, o sea entre el algodon y el tapon, pero nunca se deben
dejar burbujas en la parte inferior, es decir, debajo del algodon, pues esto po-
dria traer como consecuencia dafios mecanicos a los especimenes, especial-
mente cuando se mueven las carpulas durante su transporte.
Cellucotton-ALGODON EN LAMINAS
COCINILLA DE CAMPANA (Sterno stove). Se le usa para calentar el agua
para matar las larvas y pupas enel campo. La mas recomendable es la coci-
nilla portatil, que funciona quemando alcohol solidificado.
Collecting bag, equipped-MORRAL PARA COLECCION
Collecting containers-RECIPIENTES PARA COLECCION
Collection number (lot)-NUMERO DE COLECCION (LOTE)
Cotton-ALGODON
CRIA INDIVIDUAL (Individual rearing). Es la cria separada de un ejem-
plar de manera que el adulto obtenido se puede asociar con la muda de la pu-
pa (crfas de pupas) o con sus correspondientes mudas de larva y pupa (crias
de larvas).
CRIA DE LARVA (Larval rearing). Veéase CRIA INDIVIDUAL.
CRIA MASIVA O DE CONJUNTO (Mass rearing). Es la cria de varios in-
dividuos juntos en un mismo recipiente. Se reconocen tres tipos: (1) cria_ma-
siva de un lote: cuando se cria una coleccion completa sin separarla por es-
pecies; (2) cria masiva de sublote: consiste en criar un conjunto de individuos
de una misma especie, identificados por el nimero de sublote; (3) cria masiva
de progenie: comprende la incubacion de los huevos de una hembra que se
aisl6 para la postura y la cria de un conjunto de las larvas que nacen de esos
huevos. la progenie esta identificada con un numero de sublote.
CRIA DE PROGENIE, SERIES (Progeny rearing, series). Es la cria que
se obtiene a partir de la postura de una hembra. Se identifica con un numero
de sublote.
CRIA DE PUPAS (Pupal rearing). Véase CRIA INDIVIDUAL.
CUCHARON (Dipper). Se puede usar cualquier cucharon que tenga el man-
go hueco de modo que se le pueda insertar cualquier palo o cafia. Es convenien-
te, pero no esencial, que el interior sea blanco (tampoco se necesita un
mango muy largo). Muy practico es el de aluminio 0 acero inoxidable de 8 oz
(240 ml) de capacidad. Pequefios recipientes de varias clases, pocillos, tazas
e incluso cucharas son utiles en muchos casos.
Dip net and bag-RED COLADORA Y BOLSA
Dipper -C UCHARON
ELEVADOR (Lifter). Instrumentos de dentisterfa (exploradores, espatu-
las, etc.) pueden usarse para transferir las mudas, las larvas y las pupas;
los mismos, deben estar perfectamente pulidos, pues de lo contrario pueden
estropearse los especimenes. No es recomendable el uso de ellos por per-
sonas poco experimentadas, en cuyo caso el uso de un gotero o de una pipeta
pequefia es mas seguro.
| ELECTRICIDAD ESTATICA (Static electricity). as cajitas y otros reci-
pientes plasticos se cargan con electricidad estatica, encontrandose dificulta-
80 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
des cuando se colocan los especimenes, pues estos son atraidos hacia las pa-
redes del recipiente. Para descargar los recipientes se tocan las paredes in-
teriores con un objeto metalico, como por ejemplo, unas tijeras pequefias.
Emergence vial-RECIPIENTES PARA LA EMERGENCIA
Entomological forceps-PINZAS ENTOMOLOGICAS
ESPONJA PLASTICA. Véase POLIURETANO.
ESPUMA SINTETICA (Styrofoam). Es un material liviano, rigido y ais-
lante que se vende en laminas de diferente espesor. Se recomienda como ma-
terial de embalaje. También se le puede utilizar para hacer traillas para al-
macenar los frasquitos plasticos. Esto ultimo se hace horadando un orificio
del didmetro apropiado en la lamina, en el cual se introduce el frasquito.
FRASQUITO DE VIDRIO DE PERFUMERIA (Microvial, perfume vial).
Son pequefias botellitas de vidrio de 7.5mm x 50 mmO.D. y 1 ml de capaci-
dad (1/4 dracma) provistos con tapa de polietileno y comercialmente usados
para embotellar muestras de perfume. Son excelentes para conservar especi-
menes pequefios; pero debido al reducido diametro del cuello, se hace dificil
introducir en ellos mudas grandes, por lo que no se les recomienda para su
uso generalizado; en cambio se pueden emplear frasquitos de vidrio mas gran-
des y sin cuello. Los descritos en primer término pueden obtenerse de Acme
Vial and Glass Co., 4909 San Fernando Road West, Los Angeles, California
90039 (Acme long style patent lip vial, 1/4 dram, with AG 187 polyethylene
stopper).
FRASQUITO PLASTICO (Plastic vial). Un frasquito transparente de polies-
tireno, con tapa de polietileno es un recipiente recomendable para crias in-
dividuales y, modificandole la tapa como recipiente para postura. Los de 5
dracmas (5/8 oz = 18.5 ml) y de 9 dracmas (1 1/8 oz = 33.3 ml) manufactu-
rados por Thornton Plastic Co., 745 Pacific Ave., Salt Lake City, Utah 84104,
son los mas recomendables. Véase PLASTICOS DE POLIESTIRENO para las
precauciones a tomar con respecto a varios solventes.
FRASQUITO PARA CRIAR LARVA (Pupation vial). Es un frasquito plas-
tico transparente de 5 dracmas (18.5 ml) en donde se aisla una larva hasta
que se transforme en pupa. Para especies muy grandes se uSa el de 9 drac-
mas (33.3 ml). Deben estar cerrados con su tapa de polietileno.
FRASQUITO PARA POSTURA, JAULA (Oviposition vial, cage). Se hacen
de la manera siguiente: se satura un pedazo de algodon absorbente con agua
limpia y se le coloca, ajustado, en el fondo de un frasquito plastico de 9 drac-
mas (33.3 ml), de tal manera que alcance hasta una altura aproximada de 12
mm (1/2 pulgada). Se corta una tirilla de papel toalla o de filtro de unos 2 cm
(3/4 de pulgada) de ancho y 6.2 (2 1/2 pulgadas) de largo y se le hace un do-
bles de 1.2 cm (1/2 pulgada) en uno de los extremos. La tirilla se introduce
dentro del frasquito por el extremo doblado, hasta que toque algod6on; enton-
ces, toda la tirilla se pega a la pared del recipiente y se le deja caer una gota
de agua encima, para que se adhiera al vidrio. El exceso de humedad de las
paredes interiores se quita con papel de filtro, después de lo cual se le cie-
rra con tapa de polietileno. Mas tarde, en el laboratorio, el frasquito se pue-
de convertir en una jaula plastica (véase JAULAS) poniéndole una tapa con ce-
dazo de tela de nylon, en vez de la tapa de polietileno, la cual se coloca sobre
el cedazo y encima del algodén humedecido con solucioén azucarada.
Gelatin capsules-CAPSULAS DE GELATINA
Grease pencil (china and glass, wax)-LAPIZ GRASO O DE CERA
Holding vial-RECIPIENTE DE MANTENIMIENTO
Individual rearing-CRIA INDIVIDUAL
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 81
JAULAS (TAZA PLASTICA, FRASQUITO PARA POSTURA, DE FRASQUI-
TO PLASTICO) (Cages). Cualquier clase de recipiente plastico, de vidrio o
de carton, puede convertirse en una jaula si se le adhiere una tapa con cedazo.
Se recomienda en uso de frasquitos plasticos para hacer jaulas pequefias; las
grandes se hacen con tazas plasticas. |
JAULA DE FRASQUITO PLASTICO (Plastic vial cage). Se hacen con fras-
quitos plasticos. A la tapa de polietileno se le corta la parte central y con el
anillo que queda, se asegura un pedazo de tela de nylon a la boca del frasquito.
Véase PLASTICOS DE POLIESTIRENO para las precauciones a tomar con res-
pecto a varios solventes.
JAULA DE TAZA PLASTICA (Plastic cup cage). Se hacen cortando la par-
te central de la tapa de polietileno y usando el anillo que queda, para asegurar
un cedazo de tela de nylon a la boca de la taza. En el centro del cedazo se
cortan dos ranuras en angulo recto y lo suficientemente anchas como para per-
mitir el paso de un aspirador; esta abertura se cierra con un tapon de algodon.
Killing tube, jar-TUBO O FRASCO PARA MATAR MOSQUITOS
LAC TOFENOL (Lactophenol). La mezcla de una parte de fenol (acido car-
bolico absoluto), una parte de acido lactico absoluto, 2 partes de glicerina y
una parte de agua se una comunmente para matar y preservar larvas y pupas
y mudas (Hopkins y Mattingly 1952: 30-31). El material asi preservado se
deshidrata muy dificilmente y por ello es dificultoso hacer montajes perma-
nentes en euparal o balsamo; por lo tanto, el uso rutinario de lactofenol no se
recomienda.
LAPIZ GRASO O DE CERA (Grease, china or wax pencil). Ldapices para
marcar sobre vidrio y plastico. Las marcas se les puede borrar facilmente
con algodon.
Larval food-ALIMENTOS PARA LARVAS
Larval rearing (see Individual rearing)-CRIA DE LARVA
Lifter-ELEVADOR
LOTE (Lot). Numero asignado a una colecci6n completa. Véase NUMERO
DE COLECCION.
Mass rearing-CRIA MASIVA O DE CONJUNTO
Microvial (Perfume vial)-FRASQUITO DE VIDRIO
MORRAL PARA COLECCION (Collecting bag, equipped). En los viajes de
coleccion debe siempre llevarse un morral de colecci6n de lona gruesa y fuer-
te (el ''U.S. Army or Marine Corps musette bag"' is muy conveniente), equipa-
do con lo siguiente: tarjetas de coleccio6n, cuaderno de notas o libreta de cam-
po, mapas, altimetro, termometro, lupa, lapices, pinceles de pelo de came-
llo, lapiz graso, etiquetas, papel higiénico, toallas de papel, tijeras pequefias,
pinzas, escalpelos, navaja, machete, linterna de bateria, una palilla o cuchara
de albafiil, liviana y un par de botas plasticas o de goma.
Mosquito pump-BOMBA PARA MOSQUITOS
NUMERO DE COLECCION, LOTE (Collection number, lot). Es el numero
que se le da a cada coleccion y el cual identifica todos los especimenes de la
misma. Se le divide en sublotes para separar diferentes especies dentro de
una misma coleccion (o hembras individuales para criar sus progenies) y nu-
meros individuales que identifican cada cria individual.
Nylon netting-TEJIDOS DE NYLON
Oviposition vial, cage-FRASQUITO PARA POSTURA, JAULA
PAPEL HIGIENICO (Tissue paper). Es un papel suave, absorbente, blan-
do (kleenex o papel de bafio) que se usa para hacer las tirillas de papel que van
82 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
dentro de los tubos con cloroformo o para proteccion de los adultos guardados
en los recipientes plasticos.
PAPEL RESISTENTE A LA HUMEDAD (Wet strength paper). Los discos
para posturas y para que Se fijen los estadios juveniles de Mansonia, deben cor-
tarse de papel crespon fuerte, resistente a la humedad y que se puede obtener
de las papelerias de las grandes ciudades. Sele usa para envolver, y esta tra-
tado con pequefias cantidades de resinas sintéticas para reducir la absorcion de
agua. Sino se consigue papel de este tipo, puede usarse papel toalla ordinario.
PAPEL TOALLA (Paper toweling). Para el almacenaje y preservacion de
mosquitos en cajas plasticas, debe usarse solamente papel toalla casero del que
viene en rollos (Scott towels o productos similares). Corte el papel en cuadra-
dos que quepan exactamente dentro de las cajitas plasticas, para evitar que los
especimenes se trasloquen. El papel debe guardarse en un lugar seco, libre
de plagas y hongos. las tiras de papel que se usan en los recipientes para pos-
turas deben hacerse de un papel mas grueso, como el de las toallas de papel
para secarse las manos, que también sirve para hacer los discos a los cuales
se fijan los estadios juveniles de Mansonia.
Paper toweling-PAPEL TOALLA
Pillboxes-CAJITAS PLASTICAS
PINZAS ENTOMOLOGICAS (Entomological forceps). Son pinzas muy li-
vianas, de poca presién, con el extremo en forma de espatula (como las ofre-
cidas por Ward's C310 0 Turtox 110A 435), que se usan para transferir los
adultos en los procesos de almacenaje y preservacion. Al tomar los mosqui-
tos con las pinzas, estos deben asirse siempre por las patas.
PIPETA DE BATERIA (Battery pipette). De los hidrometros de bateria de
carros que se encuentran en el comercio, Se pueden hacer pipetas excelentes
para coleccionar en las axilas de las hojas, flores, bracteas y pequefios huecos
en los arboles. El elemento del hidro6metro se descarta y se corta el reborde
y los nédulos internos del tapo6n de goma. El tubo rigido de goma se sustituye
por uno de plastico acrilico de 9 mm O.D. el cual se reduce en diametro en la
forma como se indica en ASPIRADOR. El tubo plastico se inserta a través del
tapon de goma de tal manera que su extremo interno coincida con el extremo
terminal del tapon de goma dentro de la pipeta.
PIPETA, GOTERO (Pipette, medicine dropper). Una gran variedad de
pipetas se pueden usar para la coleccion y transferencia de los estadios juve-
niles. Para el trabajo en el campo recomendamos pipetas con pera de caucho
de 30 ml (1 0z) de capacidad y unos 15 cm (6 pulgadas) de longitud y con un
tubo plastico acrilico de 9 mm (3/8 pulgadas). El extremo del tubo se adel-
gaza como se indicd en ASPIRADOR. Pipetas mas pequefias pueden hacerse
con tubo de vidrio de 6 mm (1/4 pulgada) y pera de caucho de 10 ml. Son muy
utiles las pipetas goteros de polietileno, la punta de las cuales se puede cortar
con tigeras. Goteros ordinarios con el extremo cortado y pulido a la llama se
recomiendan para el traslado de mudas, larvas y pupas. Véase también
PIPETA DE BATERIA.
Pipette, medicine dropper-PIPETA, GOTERO
PISETA, BOTELLA LAVADORA (Squeeze, wash bottle). Una botella plas-
tica de polietileno con un tubito plastico por el cual se expulsa el liquido,
cuando se aprieta la botella, es muy util para llenar las carpulas de vidrio con
alcohol. Nunca se debe apuntar el chorrito de alcohol directamente contra los
especimenes.
Plastic bag-BOLSA PLASTICA
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 83
Plastic cup, cage-JAULA DE TAZA PLASTICA
PLASTICOS DE POLIESTIRENO (Polystyrene plastic). Paradiclorobenceno,
cloroformo, acetato de etilo y numerosos solventes organicos, disuelven el
poliestireno; por lo tanto, debe tenerse cuidado de que estos solventes no en-
tren en contacto directo con recipientes y otros utiles de este material.
Plastic sorting containers-RECIPIENTES PLASTICOS PARA SEPARAR Y
SELECCIONAR
Plastic vial-FRASQUITO PLASTICO
Plastic vial cage-JAULA DE FRASQUITO PLASTICO
Plastic water can (Jerry can)-RECIPIENTE PLASTICO PARA AGUA
POLIURETANO, ESPONJA PLASTICA (Polyurethane). Es un material
plastico, esponjoso, que se expende en laminas de diferente espesor y que se
usa mucho en tapiceria. Se le recomienda como material de embalaje para el
envio de cajaS con mosquitos montados.
Polystyrene plastic-PLASTICOS DE POLIESTIRENO
Polyurethane-POLIURETANO
Progeny rearing (series)-CRIA DE PROGENIE
Pupal rearing (see Individual rearing)-CRIA DE PUPAS
Pupation vial-FRASQUITO PARA CRIAR LARVAS
Racks-TRAILLAS
Rearing containers-RECIPIENTES PARA CRIA
RECIPIENTES PARA COLECCION (Collecting containers). Una variedad
de recipientes de plastico, de vidrio y de carton han sido usados satisfactoria-
mente para la cria, transporte y almacenaje de los estadios juveniles. Los
recipientes altamente elaborados y con tapones ventilados (Russell et al 1963:
290) no son necesarios. Nosotros recomendamos el uso de TAZAS PLASTICAS
(véase el aparte bajo ese titulo), las cuales son livianas, poco costosas y se
pueden agrupar en pilas cuando estan vacias. Véase también RECIPIENTES
PLASTICOS PARA SEPARAR Y SELECCIONAR.
RECIPIENTES PARA CRIA (Rearing containers). Recipientes plasticos,
de vidrio o de carton de varios tipos y tamafios se han usado satisfactoriamen-
te para la cria de estadios juveniles. Recomendamos las TAZAS PLASTICAS
para crias masivas y FRASQUITOS PLASTICOS para crias individuales.
RECIPIENTES PARA LA EMERGENCIA DE ADULTOS (Emergence vials).
Recipientes plasticos de 5 dracmas de capacidad, son los usados para criar pu-
pas de especies pequefas o medianas hasta la emergencia del adulto. Para
especies grandes se uSa el de 9 dracmas. Estos recipientes deben estar siem-
pre cerrados con sus correspondientes tapas de polietileno.
RECIPIENTES DE MANTENIMIENTO (Holding vial). Son para los adultos
que estan en el periodo de endurecimiento (24 o 48 horas). Se les hace de
la manera siguiente: un pedazo de algodon absorbente se satura con agua lim-
pia y se le coloca, apretandolo fuertemente, en el fondo en un frasquito plas-
tico de 5 dracmas hasta que alcance un nivel de unos 12 mm (1/2 pulgada).
En el caso de especimenes grandes debe usarse el frasquito de 9 dracmas.
El recipiente se debe mantener siempre cerrado con una tapa de polietileno.
Si hay condensacion de vapor de agua dentro del recipiente se sustituye la tapa
por una malla fina de nylon. Un procedimiento mas sencillo que el descrito
anteriormente para mantener los adultos vivos es el siguiente: Primero trans-
fiera el adulto a un frasquito plastico limpio. Luego, corte una tira de papel
toalla o papel de filtro, similar a la que se usa en el frasquito para postura
(véase el aparte correspondente), solamente que es algo mas pequefia. A con-
84 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
tinuacion humedezca un extremo de la tira, inserte el mismo dentro del fras-
quito y sujete el otro extremo bajo la tapa, de manera que esta parte permanez-
ca en la parte posterior.
RECIPIENTE PLASTICO PARA AGUA (Plastic water can, jerry can). Un
recipiente o jarrafa plastica (de polipropileno) de 20 litros (5 galones) de capa-
cidad, utilizado para almacenar agua, debe llevarse siempre a los viajes de
campo. El mismo se debe llenar con agua limpia que servira para lavar los
recipientes, los criaderos y para la seleccion del material, también se puede
llenar con agua de manantiales o arroyos, filtrandola previamente con una red
coladora.
RECIPIENTES PARA LA SELECCION (Sorting containers). Una gran va-
riedad de recipientes se usan para Seleccionar los estadios juveniles en el
campo (bandejas esmaltadas, cubetas metalicas, etc.); pero recomendamos
las de tipo plastico, que son mas livianas. Véase RECIPIENTES PLASTICOS
PARA SEPARAR Y SELECCIONAR.
RECIPIENTES PLASTICOS PARA SEPARAR Y SELECCIONAR (Plastic
sorting containers). Recipientes plasticos de varias formas (baldes, cubetas,
platones, bandejas, etc.) de polietileno o polipropileno son muy utiles para
seleccionar y Separar las colecciones en el campo y en el laboratorio.
RED COLADORA Y BOLSA (Dip net and bag). El aro puede ser de un mo-
delo clasico para red, de acuario o hecho a mano con un alambre comutn, con
15 cm (6 pulgadas) de diametro. La bolsa se debe hacer de tejido de nylon fi-
no (véase TEJIDOS DE NYLON), o de seda (No. 0), la cual se cose con una
banda de muselina para introducirla al aro. La profundidad de la bolsa no debe
exceder de 10 cm y su extremo libre debe ser redondeado y no agudo.
RED PARA COLECCIONAR EN EL AGUA (Aquatic net). Varias clases de
redes con marcos circulares, triangulares o cuadrados pueden usarse para
estos fines. La bolsa de la red debe siempre ser de nylon de malla fina (véa-
se TEJIDOS DE NYLON).
Screen top-TAPA CON CEDAZO
Shell vial, glass (procaine tube or cartridge)-CARPULA DE VIDRIO
SIFON (Siphon). Un tubo largo de caucho 0 goma puede usarse como sifon
para sacar agua de criaderos localizados por encima del suelo. Para que se
inicie el paso del agua desde el criadero al recipiente de coleccion, se coloca
un extremo del tubo dentro del agua del criadero y por el otra se succiona con
la boca hasta que comience a salir el agua; luego, este Ultimo se le pone den-
tro del recipiente, el cual debe estar a un nivel mas bajo que el criadero.
Siphon-SIFON
Sorting containers-RECIPIENTES PARA LA SELECCION
Squeeze bottle, wash-PISETA
Static electricity- ELEC TRICIDAD ESTATICA
Sterno stove-COCINILLA DE CAMPANA
Styrofoam-ESPUMA SINTETICA
Sublot-SUBLOTE
SUBLOTE (Sublot). Es una subdivision de una coleccién (lote) que com-
prende todos los individuos de una misma especie o hembras individuales para
cria de progenies (véase NUMERO DE COLECCION).
Suction tube (see Aspirator)-TUBO DE SUCCION
TAPA CON CEDAZO (Screen top). Se preparan cortando el disco central
de la tapa de polietileno y con el anillo que queda, se fija la tela de nylon al
recipiente. Cuando sea necesario alimentar los mosquitos con sangre, se de-
be usar un nylon mas ordinario, es decir de malla menos tupida, en las otras
circunstancias se debe usar el mas fino.
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 85
TAZA PLASTICA (Plastic cup). Los recipientes mas practicos para co-
-lecciOn y para crias masivas son las tazas de poliestireno blanco opaco, con
tapas de polietileno, de las que se usan en el comercio para empacar alimen-
tos y como recipientes refrigeradores domeésticos. Estos envases son poco
costosos (mas baratos que los de papel o carto6n encerado), versatiles, ocupan
poco espacio (para almacenarlos cuando estan vacios) y sirven también para
utilizarlos en el campo. Las de 15 oz (450 ml) (medium impact cup HP 1215
MB) con tapa de polietileno (HP 200), manufacturadas por Highland Printers
and Plastic Molders, 965 North Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, California 91103,
han sidos usada durante varios afios y han dado resultados muy satisfactorios.
Véase PLASTICOS DE POLIESTIRENO para las precauciones a tomar con los
varios solventes. Un recipiente cilfndrico de una pinta (0.453 1t), en los que
se expende helados, encaja muy bien en el reborde interno de la taza plastica,
y quitandole el fondo y poniéndole un cedazo de tela de nylon, puede usarse
como jaula.
TEJIDOS DE NYLON (Nylon netting). Tela de nylon es la preferida para
hacer redes y los cedazos de las tapas paralas jaulas. Para redes se usa la
malla fina (17 por mm = 42 por pulgada). Para las tapas debe usarse una ma-
lla menos fina (10 por mm = 25 por pulgada) para que los mosquitos se puedan
alimentar través de la misma.
Tissue paper-PAPEL HIGIENICO
TRAILLAS (Racks). Traillas para sostener los frasquitos plasticos se
pueden hacer horadando huecos del diametro apropiado, en listones o planchas
de espuma sintética (Styrofoam), en los que se colocan los frasquitos.
TUBO DE SUCCION (Suction tube). Véase ASPIRADOR.
TUBO O FRASCO PARA MATAR MOSQUITOS (Killing tube, jar). Cloro-
formo es el agente preferido para matar los mosquitos adultos, pero tambien
puede usarse acetato de etilo. El cianuro no se recomienda para uso general.
Los tubos de cloroformo se preparan con tubos de ensayo de vidrio de 25 mm
por 200 mm (nunca se deben usar tubos plasticos). El fondo de los mismos se
rellena, hasta una altura de 20 a 25 mm (1 pulgada o menos), con una esponja
de caucho o con tiras de caucho cortadas en pedacitos. El caucho se satura
con cloroformo y se cubre con un pedazo de papel ordinario aovillado (no debe
ser absorbente), que se coloca a una altura de 12-15 mm (cerca de 1/2 pul-
gada) del mismo, el papel se tapa a la vez con un disco de papel secante blan-
co. Antes de cada viaje, se hecha cloroformo hasta que el caucho se hinche y
se agregan 2 o 3 tiras largas de papel higiénico, para suministrar superficie
ala que los mosquitos puedan adherirse. Estas tiras de papel deben reem-
plazarse tan pronto se humedezcan. Cualquier exceso de cloroformo, asi
como la humedad dentro del tubo, debe eliminarse completamente. Se le debe
mantener tapado con un corcho ordinario. Una cinta de tela adhesiva alrededor
de la base y de la boca del tubo, disminuye las posibilidades de que se quiebre.
Cuando el agente activo es acetato de etilo, se pone una capa de yeso en vez de
caucho, y papel secante. Un frasco para matar mosquitos se prepara colocando
bolas de algodon saturado con cloroformo o acetato de etilo, en un frasco de
boca ancha. La red con los mosquitos se mete dentro del frasco (cuidando de
que no toque el algodon), que se tapa por unos pocos minutos. Frascos perma-
nentes de este tipo no son necesarios.
Wet strength paper-PAPEL RESISTENTE A LA HUMEDAD
86 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
REFERENCIAS CITADAS
Bates, Marston
1944. Notes on the construction and use of stable traps for mosquito stud-
ies. Natl. Malarial Soc., J. 3: 135-145.
Belkin, John N.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Vol 1.
Berkeley, U. Calif. Press. 608 p.
Belkin, John N., R. X. Schick, P. Galindo y T. H. G. Aitken
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae) I. A project for a systematic
study of the mosquitoes of Middle America. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contrib.
1(2): 1-17.
1967. Estudios sobre mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae) I. Un proyecto para
un estudio sistematico de los mosquitos de Meso-América. Amer. Ent.
Inst., Contrib. 1(2a): 1-19. (Traduccion por Pablo Barreto, Felipe J.
Martin y Abdiel J. Adames. )
Bruce-Chwatt, Leonard J.
1964. A simple device for anesthetizing mosquitoes with carbon dioxide.
Mosquito News 24: 222-223.
Carpenter, Stanley J. y W. J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitos of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley, U.
Calif. Press. 360 p.
Earle, Walter C.
1949. Trapping and deflection of anopheline mosquitoes in Boyd, Mark F.
Malariology. Philadelphia, Saunders. p. 1221-1231.
Forattini, Oswaldo P.
1962. Entomologia Medica. Vol 1. Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Higiene e
Saude Publica. 662 p. :
Gressitt, J. Linsley y M. K. Gressitt
1962. An improved Malaise trap. Pacific Insects 4: 87-90.
Holdridge, Leslie R.
1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data.
Science 105: 367-368.
Hopkins, George H. E. y P. F. Mattingly
1952. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. I.-Larval bionomics of mosqui-
toes and taxonomy of culicine larvae. Ed. 2. London, British Museum
(Nat. Hist.). 355 p.
Horsfall, William R.
1955. Mosquitoes, their bionomics and relation to disease. New York,
Ronald Press. 1723 p.
Howard, Leland O., H. G. Dyar y F. Knab
(1913). The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies.
Vol 1. Washington, Carnegie Inst. 520 p. (Carnegie P. 159).
King, Willard V., G. H. Bradley, C. N. Smith y W. C. McDuffie
1960. A handbook of the mosquitoes of the Southeastern United States.
U.S.D.A. Agr. Handb. 173. 188 p.
Laurence, B. R., R. Page y S. A. Smith ,
1962. Laboratory colonization of Mansonia mosquitoes. B. Ent. Res. 53:
515-519. |
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 87
Macdonald, William W.
1960. On the systematics and ecology of Armigeres subgenus Leicesteria
(Diptera, Culicidae). Inst. Med. Res. Fed. Malaya, Studies 29: 110-
153 (Malaysian Parasites XXXVIII).
Magoon, Estus H.
1935. A portable trap for capturing mosquitoes. B. Ent. Res. 26: 363-372.
Malaise, Rene
1937. A new insect- Strap: Ent. Tidskrift 58: 148-160.
Marks, Elizabeth N.
1g 57. The subgenus Ochlerotatus in the Australian Region (Diptera: Culici-
dae) 1. Notes on classification, with description of a new species.
Queensland U. Papers. Ent. 1: 71-83.
Matheson, Robert
1944. Handbook of the mosquitoes of North America. Ed. 2. Ithaca, Com-
stock Publishing Co. 314 p. |
Mulhern, Thomas D.
1953. Better results with mosquito light traps through standardizing me-
chanical performance. Mosquito News 13: 130-133.
Russell, Paul F., L. S. West, R. D. Manwell y G. MacDonald
1963. Practical Malariology. London, Oxford U. Press. 1750 p.
Shannon, Raymond C.
1939. Methods for collecting and feeding mosquitoes in jungle yellow fever
studies. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 19: 131-140.
1943. Trinidad Government-Rockefeller Foundation: Malaria Annual Re-
port of the Cooperative work in Trinidad and Tobago. Port-of-Spain,
Government Printers.
Sudia, W. D. y R. W. Chamberlain
1962. Battery-operated light trap, an improved model. Mosquito News
22; 126-129;
Townes, Henry K.
(1963). Design for a Malaise trap. Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 64: 253-262.
Trembley, Helen L.
1955. Mosquito culture techniques and experimental procedures. Amer.
Mosq. Control Assoc., B. 3, 73 p.
Worth, C. Brooke y A. H. Jonkers
1962. Two traps for mosquitos attracted to small vertebrate animals.
Mosq. News 22: 18-21.
Zulueta, Julian de
1950. A study of the habits of the adult mosquitoes dwelling in the savannas
of Eastern Colombia. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 30: 325-339.
88 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 2a, 1967
MOSQUITOS DE MESO-AMERICA
Codigo: Fecha:
Mimeros 2 Oo : Colector:
Docaligady hs a. Cindad mas cercana: er veente? ccs NR a
DistPitG fers e548 eee Pate ema i eel SOLOS
AMBIENTE GENERAL - 1. Plantas lefiosas:altura 0 - 2 - 8-15 -30m;densidad0-1-2-3 2.Hierbas, pastos:altura 0-.5-1-2-5-8m; densidad
0-1-2-3 3.Epifitas:0-1-2-3 4. Margen o interior de vegetacion, a lo largo de caminos, diques, canales 5.Ribera de mar, lago, arroyo,
manglar, marisma 6. Vegetacidn virgen, claro, pastoreo, plantio, cultivo, doméstico 7. Luz: sombra total, sombra parcial, pleno sol
Lluvia anual: ca__tt_=¥=-_+=.cm Meses lluviosos: E- F-M-A-M-J-J-A-S-O-N-D _ Formacion vegetal:
SUBLOTES
| Especies |L|1|P| plo
eGhe ON 1
ESTADIOS JUVENILES
Criadero-1. Laguna, lago 2. Charco: grande, pequefio 3.Huellas de animales 4. Pantano: interior,
margen, depresién cenagosa 5. Bosque inundado 6. Infiltraci6n, manantial 7.Pozo 8.Arroyo:mar-
gen, charco, remanso 9. Zanja, drenaje 10. Fuente, alcantarilla 11.Cueva de cangrejo:grande, pequenia
12. Hueco en la roca: volcdnica, coralina, de orilla de rios o del mar 13. Recipiente artificial: gran-
de, pequefio:_______—=————S—S—S—S—s14. Hueco ern Arbol: grande, pequefio: 15. Arbol caido:
_____—16. Bambu: cortadoo quebrado, entrenudo 17. Recipiente de origen animal en el suelo:
18. Hoja fronda, espata, caida: 19. Fruto caido, nuez, cascara:
20. Fruto no caido: 21. Axila de hoja: epifita, terrestre: 22. Flor: bractea, espata:
23. Ascidia: 24. Trampa: potes de bambu, Altura del criadero m
Agua-1. Permanente, semipermanente, temporal 2.Clara, turbia, coloreada:_______3. Estancada,
corriente lenta, moderada, fuerte 4. Dulce, salobre, salada 5. Sucia, legamosa, fermentada
oo aS
er od lek Le
Ras eee
Vegetacidn en el criadero - 1. Abundante, escasa, nula 2. Flotante, espumosa, con algas 3. Pasto,
hierbas, lenosa, flotando: , Sumergida:
Fondo-1. Barro, arena, grava, roca 2. Materia organica: vegetal __._—=——S—Ss animal OBSERVACIONES
ADULTOS
1. Sitio: (especificar situacién exacta)
3. Altura sobre el suelo______m
2. Tipo: picando - posando, en enjambre, reposando, 4. Hospedador o cebo:
barriendd, “condugi ss 6. ee trampa oes i Mora deycaptura:
CRIAS INDIVIDUALES
No - presente © perdida + muerta, preservada en alcohol
[Sub | Especies |ilp|o|¢]|sub | Especies |i[p|o]9]Sub | Especies [1] p[o[¢|Sub | Especies |
-100 ahaa er fap ee isa eee Pe paste
eee sl el ee A ee eS
Pe ae ee ee ae oe ae
Be coe cena cee 1 5 ATR 1 ge) ee Se Es ee ee ae ee
i ee eee le ea eee
2 ee ei ee ee ee ee |
ee ee en ee vere |
pam ee Sa Ae ee te le oe le OL ed
Be ee eee ee tleOht oo Sails Db ele os
A eee Se eee ee ee a
Sa eo See eee de sis ter Al ate edi Re
er ee eee eee ee
cil Mma asces | i cmloe Ge crc te ume e beer | Ol amlin ote FECT 2a RAE Bas ae 2 Py eae
eA ae RR GS De OP ds ll A 2 ea eae
iG EUG Eide Cia Or Te Set a ee we
eo babt ites Gime le teem OE Re eee ee ae
See Cee Ee ee oe eo eee oe
Co Ve ee Se eee eee ee ee ea ae
Hal SST SA CE ek a Ss ee ee
TS Decne ea es My ee ee eee rey ec ee ee ee ee Pe eee
re ee Se cee ee ie ee
UG ase eR ee ae a er Oe
eR oe aso te ee ee ee be ee tc
2 ae ke ee eee eee ee ee
Co Ree RENE eee ae Oe eee ae
(a ol el le PA AS ie Ge OE Se ees
Fig. 1. Tarjeta de Coleccion
Belkin et al: Métodos para Coleccionar, Criar y Preservar 89
Code: MOSQUITOES OF MIDDLE AMERICA Data:
Number:_ S@_ Collector:
SOON i ceed ee. es | 5 Elevation:
DigVibtsencle al : Photo:
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT -1. Woody plants:height 0 -2- 8-15 -30m: density 0-1-2-3 2. Herbs, grasses:height 0-.5-1-2-5- 8m:
density 0-1-2-3 3. Epiphytes:0-1-2-3 4. Edge or interior of vegetation, along road, dike, bank 5. Shore of sea, lake, stream
mangrove, saltmarsh 6. Virgin vegetation, clearing, grazing, plantation, cultivation, domestic 7. Light:deep shade, partial shade, full sun
Annual rainfall: ca cm Rainy season: J- F-M-A-M-J-J-A-S-O-N-D Vegetation type:
IMMATURE STAGES
Breeding site -1. Pond, lake 2. Ground pool: large, small 3. Animaltracks 4.Swamp interior,
margin, marshy depression 5. Flooded forest 6.Seepage, spring 7.Well 8.Stream: margin, pool,
blocked 9. Ditch, drain 10. Fountain, gutter 11.Crabhole:large, smajl 12. Rockhole:volcanic, coral
stream margin, seaside 13. Artificial container: large, small:_____ 14. Treehole:large,
small:__________ 15, Fallen tree: _________ 16. Bamboo: cut or broken, uncut internode
17. Animal container on ground:_____________ 18. Fallen leaf, frond, spathe: —___________
19. Fallen fruit, nut, rind:_________ 20. Attached fruit:_____ 21. Leaf axil: epiphytic,
(lar reel ef eR WRG ORCL, OOM a
23. Pitcher:_m__._ 24. Trap: bamboo pot, Height of site above ground. m
Water - 1. Permanent, sentipermanent, temporary 2. Clear, turbid, colored: ———_____
3. Stagnant, slow, moderate, strong current 4. Fresh, brackish, salty 5. Foul,slimy, fermenting
Vey in Breeding Site - 1. Abundant, scanty, none 2. Flotage, scum, algae 3. Grassy,
bececeo; ‘woody , foatig a swmven eee submerged : —————___
Bottom - 1. Mud, sand, gravel, rock 2. Organic matter: plant animal
1. Site: (specify exact situation)
3. Height above ground
2. pee biting-landing, swarming, resting, sweeping, 4. Host or bait:
at light: OP 5. Time of capture:
: ie}
LAAN aN
1
EN BLANCO
a
Fig. 2. Etiquetas de Coleccionar y Criar
+
i
i
f a
ce)
Sablon”
— a
ae, ak
pie
Lee
+e
ew
ra ie of
a
* Fe hay aver itn
tiie
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
é mit
AOU
Volume 1, Number 3, 1965 ern *
THE BIOLOGY OF HERIADES CARINATA CRESSON
(Hymenoptera, Megachilidae)
By
ROBERT W. MATHEWS
PUBLICATIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Contribution Series
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number,
with separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a
volume. Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes
are $12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with
its beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total
less than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders or correspondence to the
American Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
No. 1.
No. 2;
No. 4.
The Memoirs are for book-length monographs on insects. They are issued as cloth-bound
volumes, at irregular intervals as suitable manuscripts are available. Numbers are sold
separately, or in subscriptions to the series. Subscribers receive a 10% discount from the regu-
Address orders or correspondence to the American Entomological Institute, 5950
Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
No. 1.
lar price.
Volume I
Dasch, Clement FE. 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumoni- |
dae). 75 pages, 69 figures. : Price: $2.25, postpaid
Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae).
I. Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the or ee ?
Middle America.
II. Belkin, John N., et al. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation
of mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
Mathews, Robert W. 1965. The biology of Heriades carinata Cresson (Hymenop-
tera, Megachilidae). 33 pages, 23 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae).
Ill. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from Tonga and
Samoa.
IV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of Salem
expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid |
Memoir Series
Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1961. A catalogue
and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. 522 pages.
Price: $14.50, postpaid
Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1962. Ichneumonidae of America north
of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. 305 pages, 162 maps.
‘Price: $9.50, postpaid
Dasch, Clement E. 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5. Subfamil
Diplazontinae. 304 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
Matsuda, Ryuichi, 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head. 334 pages,
111 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 3, 1965
HE BIOLOGY OF HERIADES CARINATA CRESSON
(Hymenoptera, Megachilidae)
| a
ROBERT W. MATHEWS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
POSELACL . oo dae vas Pied Oye cea ue es Cealy k Ue nists Weis sk boi Re > PAL te eats |
THUPOCUCIION See yekie cee Cece ae wa PGi eve abu ks Poy isees es 1
Acknowledgements ....... ieee es OCC ee he ee ares: 2
Procedure
NOSUNE HADIAL Cees ewalee da oe eee eee ue Ce ees Pe 3
NGSE BIOCK DESCrUNION cai ei blac aoe kee Ge elcné Cui Me ee a
Seasonal History
ADUNGENCE \. ous ode I oh ee a Nagra Re aed Saray se eae
Period of Nesting Adtvity ewe bie ce Cette ih bbe owe ees 4
Adult Emergence ........ Vee eee eee ba Ge kay eee aa 9)
Recovery and Population Size ....... Spm b ie 8 ae CaO sche Giese D
Adult Longevity and Nests Per Petale ean ok Pee ea eka weed 9)
Adult Activities
Pre-nest Activity and Mating ........... TE ery ear en ube sea 2 7
Availability of Natural Nest Sites .....ccsenecenees wares ee !
Nest Site Selection and Preparation ......cccceccsens saan eis! a
Provisioning ..... NENEB (RS a a has tipeaa eee s A ee oe ork 8
Pollen Placement Behavior ...... (ieee eS mace ee ek ee OO 9
Construction OF Cell Partition cio wikis ce gee a ee ose boys aces 10
Oviposition ..... Ce COUN oe wieie ath glk ee cae ia Wes be bs ake ee aes 10
Cap Base Construction ........66. uy ew ees yeele ts Aero eee 11
NOSt CIOSELO 2 06a i yas ee ae a hee Feu bebe bce bis cnc eo ba 11
Ne SU DCRCNSG) fy iid edk sae oe ee sy ees es eee eee 12
Nest Ralgineg and SUDeTSCQUVe . Vis es kee Se eee ee es wow alee es 13
Miscellaneous Activity ..... PN, Seige wb Gp kk oa Wa Hung eae 14
Period 00 Daily AGHVItV.. 5 ig sac een ee eee tae s Coan Wie es eee
NE GE SUPUCIUTE Gi ve cease eelen so e's! EAA ENS Oke ee Ae we A 16
Growth and Development
Technidies Of Study «os osc ccc din a Sule es wa webs e halen & 17
The Boo oak aes Oe a Wee eee eae eta ee) Va ew ee ee 18
The Larva . Eee eas SW AieaUHk eae eE ee ales Saye ev gn eek whew y 18
Description of Mature Larva ere ee Ry Re aie) Woe wielae ara ee ele 20
Post-diapause Development ...... SEES a VN a ee eis Bie Nb ee 22
Parasites 6 sie ces She es wees pe HMA Py ae eet ale bien we be ee 24
BuMary 20d DISCUGBION Vi uuk op Meena ee ees eee De gidinle 4 ad aS ee 26
Literature Cited oss d eee e ks ee ke eas Ore cies ee ds ecco ha ei en al
PLAS ey Ve aaa eels See ee ay Guagla glalar a Guarana s Wheels 29
THE BIOLOGY OF HERIADES CARINATA CRESSON!
By Robert W. Matthew sf
ABSTRACT
The life history of this bee is presented, based on observations in 1963 and
1964 on a Michigan population compared with an Oregon population observed in
1962, both nesting in trap-nests. In Michigan, a new technique, the use of Saran-
covered trap-nests, facilitated observations of intra-nest adult behavior and
larval development in situ. Two new terms are introduced; the cap base, con-
structed by the female prior to nest-capping and the operimentum spun by the
larva prior to cocoon construction.
There is one generation per year, overwintering in the prepupal stage.
Adults are active between June 23 and August 15 in Michigan and from July ll
lasting into September in Oregon; nesting reached a peak on June 30 in Mich-
igan and July 28 in Oregon. Oregon females averaged 6.4 cells per nest and
2.7 days per cell compared to 4.6 cells per nest and 1.1 days per cell for
Michigan females.
Partitions between cells and nest caps are of resin. Pollen used by the
Michigan population over 19 days during the nesting season peak was almost
exclusively staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina). Nest construction activities and
adult behavior are presented in detail and the phenomenon of nest raiding is
discussed.
Larval development, lasting 30 days, and comparative post-diapause devel-
opment of males and females in Michigan are discussed. The mature larva
is described.
Parasites included Stelis vernalis Mitchell and Sapyga louisi Krombein;
their biology and behavior is discussed. Melittobia chalybii Ashmead was a
laboratory contaminant.
INTRODUCTION
The biology of the megachiline bees has attracted considerable attention, as
it may elucidate phyletic relationships within the family and add to our knowledge
of comparative behavior of bees. Knowledge of the biology and behavior of Her-
iades, because it is regarded as one of the more primitive genera of the Mega-
chilidae (Michener, 1938), may be especially valuable.
Pe outribution Number 124 of the Biological Station of Kellogg Gull Lake Labora-
tories of Michigan State University.
24 thesis submitted to the Department of Entomology, Michigan State University,
in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent: Inst., vol. 1, no, 3, 1960
The genus Heriades occurs throughout the world except in the Australian
region and in South America. A total of eleven species is known from North
America, belonging to two subgenera, Physostetha and Neotrypetes. Heriades
(Physostetha) carinata Cresson ranges throughout most of the United States
from Quebec south to Georgia, west to British Columbia, Oregon, Utah, Ariz-
ona and Texas. Its range was mapped by Hurd and Michener (1955).
The only biological information on this species is a note by Rau (1922),
recording the emergence of two individuals from a nest in a hollowed-out stem
of sumac but giving no other details. A single nest of Heriades variolosa
(Cresson), also a wide-ranging species in North America, in a hollow twig of
Rhus glabra was described and figured by Fischer (1955). Apparently nothing
is known of the biology of any other North American Heriades, but the biology
of a South African species, H. freygessneri Schletterer, is reported by Taylor
(1962). It largely agrees with the biology of H. carinata presented here.
Some biological data also exist for European species of Heriades. Grandi
(1934) reported the biology of H. truncorum Linnaeus and H. crenulatus Ny-
lander nesting in canes of Phragmites; he also described and figured the mature
larva of H. crenulatus, the only larval description of any species of Heriades.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The material presented here was obtained during the summers of 1963 and
1964 at the Biological Station of Kellogg Gull Lake Laboratories in Kalamazoo
County, Michigan. These data are compared, where possible, with data ob-
tained on a population of the same species from Corvallis, Oregon, during the
summer of 1962, a study made possible by a National Science Foundation under -
eraduate research award (NSF G21619).
The author gratefully acknowledges the direction and assistance during all
phases of this study of Dr. Roland L. Fischer, Department of Entomology,
Michigan State University. A special thanks also are due Mr. Julian P. Dona-
hue for the excellent photographs taken for me in connection with this research.
Dr. B.D. Burks of the United States National Museum kindly identified the
chalcid parasite and Dr. R.M. Bohart of the University of California, Davis,
determined the sapygid parasite. I am grateful also for the aid of Dr. A. T.
Cross and Mr. Wm. T. Gillis in the identification of the Rhus typhina pollen.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 3
/ PROCEDURE
Nesting Habitat. In the summer of 1963, five nesting sites were chosen
along a 700 yard strip of land bordered by cultivated fields on the west and by
marsh on the east. Thickets of staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) formed a nearly
continuous border along the fields, and occurred with sassafras (Sassafras
variifolium) through the central areas to the marsh edge, where elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis) thickets predominated. Mixed young hardwoods occurred
intermittently along the strip, continuing at each end around the marsh.
Common herbacious plants of the area which flowered through the nesting
season were Melilotus alba, M. officinale, Trifolium pratense, T. repens,
Potentilla recta, and less commonly, Hypericum perforatum, Apocynum andro-
saemifolium, and Verbascum thapsus. The field adjoining the area to the south-
west was in alfalfa.
No nesting site was completely shaded; all received shade for at least part
of the day, except site 4 (Figure 2) which was situated under full sun at the open
end of a target range excavated from the side of a small hill. Site 1 was border-
ed on the north and east by staghorn sumac and sassafras thickets, and by an
open abandoned field to the south and west. A young catalpa tree shaded it in
late afternoon. Sites 2 and 5 were in small clearings surrounded by thickets of
staghorn sumac and sassafras. Site 3, opposite site 4 in the target range, was
at the end of a short path through mixed hardwoods. Site 5 was above site 4 on
the remains of the hill from which the target range had been excavated. Sites
3, 4, and 5 were all relatively close, linearly situated with site 3 about 50 feet
northwest of site 4 and with site 5 about 25 feet southeast of site 4.
In 1964, sites 1 and 5 were abandoned because of poor nesting results the
previous year, and nesting site 6 was established midway between sites 2 and 3.
It was bordered immediately to the west by young hardwoods and by marsh about
00 feet to the east. Between the nest site and the marsh was a stretch of grass
and clover (Trifolium repens) periodically mowed to admit traffic to a dumping
area previously established along the marsh edge. Adjacent to site 6, a large
patch of dogbane (Apocynum androsaemifolium) attracted a variety of hymenop-
terans throughout the nesting season.
In 1$63, Heriades carinata made 58 nesting attempts, 7 of which were at site
1, 16 at site 2, 3l at site 3, 3 at site 4, andl at site 5. In 1964 of 19 nesting
attempts 3 were made at site 2, 9 at site 3, none at site 4, and 6 at the newly
established site 6. In addition, 1 was constructed on the window ledge of my
office.
In Corvallis, Oregon, in the summer of 1962, trap-nests were placed in three
widely separated locations. Sites 1 and 2 were typical suburban backyards, in
which the nest-blocks were placed in tree crotches, along fences and stairways,
etc. The yard at site 2 was ill kept with numerous overgrown shrubs and hedges
and few flowers. Adjoining yards contained a variety of flowering plants, how-
ever. The yard at site 1, in contrast to site 2, in a newer urban development
contained very little woody vegetation and was well kept; as with site 2, pollen
1 authority for all plant names is Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th edition, 1950.
4 Contrib. Amer, Ent. Inst., vol. 1, nos 3, 1965 '
sources were available in neighboring yards. Site 3 was a small, triangular
old field with a few large trees, bordered by a small creek on one side and a
well-grazed pasture on the other. Most nests were placed on the window ledges :
and beams of an abandoned livestock shed shaded about half the day.
Of the 55 nesting attempts by H. carinata in Oregon, 47 were at site 2, 6 at
site 3, and 2 at site 1. The majority of those at site 2 were constructed in nests
placed along a stairway on the east side of the house and all observations were
made here. : :
Nest Block Description. Trap-nests such as described by Cooper (1953),
with bores of 1/8, 5/32, 7/32, and 1/4 inch diameter and variable length were :
used in Michigan, combined into blocks of nine wired together for ease of hand-
ling. Every block, containing at least two nests of each bore diameter, was |
given a number and the nine nests in each block lettered from A through I, thus ©
identifying each nest (e.g., 150C). Approximately equal numbers of these blocks —
were placed at each nesting site, with bores horizontal from eight inches to four ~
feet above the ground.
H. carinata readily accepted these nests, 86% preferring those with 1/8 inch i
bores 101 mm long in Michigan, where 77 nesting attempts were made in 1963 ;
and 1964, of which 24 were in Saran-covered bores of the type described by Mat- _
thews and Fischer (1964). In Oregon in 1962, where no 1/8 inch bores or Saran-
covered nests were used, H. carinata constructed 55 nests, primarily (62%) in
9/64 inch diameter bores 71 mm long. Glass tubes of appropriate inner diameter _
inserted into larger bores resulted in only one nesting attempt in three years |
with H. carinata, although Taylor (1962) obtained very good nesting success with
H. freygessneri in glass vials.
SEASONAL HISTORY
Abundance. Never abundant in either Michigan or Oregon, H. carinata was
only occasionally picked up in general collecting. However, at the nesting sites
where the bees' activities were concentrated, it was not uncommon to have sev-
eral nests under construction concurrently within three or four square feet.
Period of Nesting Activity. In Michigan there is one generation per year. In _
1963, nesting began on June 23 and reached its peak on June 30 when 23 nests were
under construction (Figure 10). Except for two apparent nesting attempts toward _
the end of July (July 24 and 28-31) all nests were constructed between June 23
and July 18. In 1964, the records show a similar pattern although it was a much
wetter season with fewer nests made.
In Oregon, there is apparently also one generation per year; however, the
period of adult nesting activity occurred later in the summer and was of longer
duration, The first Heriades observed to nest in Oregon were three on July ll.
Nesting reached a peak near the end of July (Figure 9) with 26 nests active con-
currently and remained at this level, with minor fluctuations, throughout the
entire month of August. When the nests were removed from the field on August
30, 20 were still in various stages of construction.
Examination of 38 males and 73 females of H. carinata in the Entomology
Museum at Michigan State University revealed a flight period in Michigan's lower
penninsula of about two months. The earliest records are those of a male on
June 13 and of four females on June 23 (the same date upon which I first saw
female Heriades active at Gull Lake). The latest male record is for August 3,
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata O
while the latest female was collected on August 19.
Adult Emergence. The first adults reared from 1963 nests kept outside over
the winter emerged on June 23, 1964; the period of emergence was one week,
June 23-29, during which 32 males and 12 females emerged. Males were first,
emerging three days before the females; they were also more variable, appear-
ing over a six day interval while female emergence was confined to a four day
period. Under natural field conditions, emergences probably extend over a
longer period, since the reared Heriades had been maintained under fairly uni-
form conditions.
Recovery and Population Size. The reared adults from 1963 were marked
and released, as soon as possible after emergence, at site 3. Marking was
done with quick- drying paints, applied in two-color combinations to the thorax.
During the emergence week, sweep samples in the nesting vicinity were made
periodically in an attempt to estimate population size and dispersal rates.
Of the 29 bees marked and released, only a single female was recovered;
she was collected in vegetation around the release area three hours after release
on June 27. In addition to this recovery, two unmarked H. carinata, one female
and one male, were collected in other sweep samples in the nesting vicinity.
Of the 10 females marked and released, one returned to construct a nest in
a trap-nest in 1964. This female, reared in a Saran-covered nest, emerged and
was markedand released at 10:00 a.m. on June 26; she began to work in a Saran-
covered nest about 30 hours after release.
This would seem to indicate that while the native Heriades population was not
excessively large, trap-nesting activities probably had little overall effect on the
population structure. Also, there is some evidence that the paint spots could
wear off in time and so it is possible that more than one 1964 nest was made by
a reared female.
Adult Longevity and Nests Per Female. Known longevity and number of nests
constructed for seven marked female bees from Michigan in 1963 are summarized
in Table 1. The oldest marked bee lived for 23 days and constructed four nests
(15 provisioned cells). However, females may often live a month or longer, for
caged females were also kept alive for 23 days, and the flight period in southern
Michigan, based on collection records, is about two months.
Males are apparently fairly long-lived, judging from the large number of
male collection records through late July, although reared caged males only
survived for 12 days.
Based on marking records, it appears that in Michigan H. carinata constructs
at least two nests per female and often more. The most known cells constructed
by a single bee was 16 for bee l. Time to complete a single nest in Michigan
averaged 5.2 days (range 2-15 days). In general, the first nest of a female's
series tends to contain more cells than subsequent nests (Table 1). There were
too few successful rearings from any one nest series to suggest whether the off-
spring sex ratio changed as the bee aged.
After one nest is completed, the bee wastes little time finding and beginning
another one; in most cases the changeover occurred in less than a day. The
following are representative records of nest changeover:
Bee l Nest 150G completed 1:50 p.m. on 6-27; first pollen for 159B brought
two hours later. Nest 159B completed at 4:00 p.m. on 6-30; at 7:00
p.m. the same day the female was resting in nest 300.
Bee 3 Nest 159G completed at 3:15 p.m. on 6-3; by 7:00 p.m. the same day
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
TABLE 1
Female longevity and nesting data for
H. carinata in Michigan, 1963
Cell contents a
Bee | Nests | Days per nest} Cells made Aborted
2 6 D 1
] 0
3 6 3
6 4 a
2 0
]
3 2
2
a
4
4 6
4 a)
]
D 3
2
6 2
0
0
0
t 5)
3
* Nest break-in, no cells constructed.
the bee had completed the bottommost resin partition in nest 159E.
Where gaps longer than one day between nests occur it seems possible that the
bee completed another undiscovered nest in that period.
The bees apparently exhibit high fidelity to their first nest site as long as
suitable nests are available, for no marked bee was found nesting at more than
one site, although nest sites were relatively close. Furthermore, the series of
nests made by a single female were usually in a localized part of the nest site
(e.g., at one end of the table at site 3) and often in adjacent nest blocks or even
adjacent holes of the same nest block.
No Oregon bees were marked, but the time to complete a single nest in Ore-
gon averaged 17.2 days (range 3-35 days), with several nests requiring over 30
days. One nest was under construction for 38 days and still unfinished. No data
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 7
on the number of nests by a single female Heriades from Oregon are available,
but since the average number of days required to complete a nest was higher,
it seems likely that a female would seldom construct more than two nests dur-
ing her life.
ADULT ACTIVITIES
Pre-nest Activity and Mating. In the laboratory, a male and female were
kept alive together for twelve days, but no mating activity was observed during
that time. However, mating in the field presumably occurs soon after emerg-
ence, probably before nest building is begun. Exceptions may occur, for in
some nests no eggs hatched and in others eggs in the first one or two cells
constructed did not hatch (or in one instance were apparently not laid) while
they did in all subsequent cells. Whether mating occurs more than once is
unknown; however, once mated, the female alone does the nest building and
males were never observed in the nesting vicinity.
Availability of Natural Nest Sites. An examination of the staghorn sumac
twigs which presumably would be acceptable nest sites to Heriades. When split
open, these hollow twigs contained nests of solitary Aculeata and most showed
evidences of having been used several times. However, of over 100 such twigs
examined, only one showed any evidence of having been used by Heriades ---
the remains of a Heriades cocoon and resin plug in the bottom, and additional
resin along the bore.
Other potential nest sites might be found in hollow elderberry twigs in the
thickets along the marsh edge, although a number of these twigs split open
failed to show any evidence of Heriades. Also, it is possible that the dead
stalks of some of the herbaceous annuals and perennials of the vicinity may
have provided natural nest sites.
Nest Site Selection and Preparation. Initial discovery of the trap-nest is
probably by chance. The bees probably encountered the weathered tables,
planks, etc., on which the trap-nests rested before discovering the nest blocks.
A female bee's search for a prospective nest site may be generalized as follows:
Upon discovering a nest site, such as a table, the bee spent about 45 minutes
entering numerous bores and quite thoroughly investigating the table's surface
cracks and crevices, ends, underside, and legs. She tended to work in spurts,
entering several adjacent bores in fairly rapid succession. While ai first she
entered all size bores, she rarely crawled all the way down the larger diameter
bores. She apparently could not distinguish whether a particular bore was al-
ready in use; this is discussed again later. During this time the bee frequently
circled the nest area as though orienting. Occasionally she disappeared from
sight but always returned almost immediately.
Eventually, nearly all her attention was directed to two or three 1/8 inch dia-
meter bores, in which she tended to remain for longer periods. Increasingly
more time was also spent hovering near the nest blocks containing the favored
bores. Finally she settled in a particular bore.
The first step in nest preparation was usually cleaning the bore of drill
filings and splinters, and the telltale pile of sawdust beneath the nest entrance
was often the first outward indication that a new nest was underway. The bee
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
dragged or kicked the chips to the nest entrance, then intermittently backed up
and kicked the pile out. The time spent at this activity varied depending on the
condition of the individual bores; one bee worked for forty minutes, while some
did practically no bore cleaning. During this activity, the bees occasionally
left on short flights, rarely longer than three or four minutes duration and usually
for only a few seconds, in the nest area.
Finally the bee began to make regular trips for pollen or resin. Some bees
found the bottom of the bore acceptable and began to store pollen directly on
it, while others chose to begin by placing a plug of resin in the bottom, storing
the first pollen above this.
One bee observed continuously throughout this activity seems representative
of the time sequence involved. Between first searching for a prospective nest
site and returning home with the first pollen load, just over two hours elapsed.
Half an hour was spent cleaning the bore. After one of her frequent short
flights of this period, she returned with a chunk of resin in her mandibles and
began plugging the bottom of the bore; six additional resin trips were made in
the next hour. Between these trips she usually spent five to ten minutes work-
ing the resin inside the nest; after the last resin trip, she remained in the nest
for 17 minutes. On the next trip she returned with a load of pollen and provision-
ing began.
Provisioning. The pattern of provisioning the cell, laying the egg and clos-
ing the cell follows a fairly predictable sequence. Several successive pollen
loads are stored in the cell bottom; then the bee switches to collecting resin
which is placed around the bore 3-4 mm beyond the edge of the pollen mass,
forming a rim which ultimately becomes the cell partition. When an opening
about the size of the bee's body remains, the bee prepares the pollen, reverses
and deposits the egg. She then completes the partition, thus sealing the cell,
and begins construction of the next cell.
The amount of time required to collect a single pollen load is undoubtedly
influenced by such factors as distance of pollen source from nest site, avail-
ability of pollen, time of day, and weather. Also, it is probable that the bees
often stopped to suck nectar while on foraging trips. In general, the time re-
quired to collect pollen loads was shortest during the middle hours of the day.
Foraging for pollen in Michigan averaged 9'57" per trip (range 2'08" to 31'53").
Random samples of pollen taken from cells constructed between June 23 and
July 12 in 1963 were found to be almost entirely staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina)
although other kinds of flowers were abundant in the area; this would suggest
an Oligolectic population, as defined by Linsley and MacSwain (1957). Although
the pollen from Oregon nests was not analyzed, the source was probably garden
flowers in neighboring yards. H. carinata has, however, been collected on a
wide variety of flowers. In addition to flower visitation records of Hurd and
Michener (1955) and Mitchell (1962), the following have been obtained from Gull
Lake: Asclepias syriaca, Monarda fistulosa, Melilotus alba, Rhus glabra,
Cichorium intybus, and Apocynum sp. Thus, the species as a whole should
probably be regarded as polylectic, although many of the records may have been
only nectar sources.
Since the principal source of pollen in Michigan was staghorn sumac which
flowered abundantly in the nesting area, it seems unlikely that the bees travelled
more than a quarter mile for pollen. Furthermore, since these flowers occur
in large masses they probably enabled the bees to collect large amounts of pollen
with relative ease.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 9
Much of the information on the timing of various nest construction activities
in Michigan is summarized in Figure ll, which presents the comings and goings
of a single bee watched continuously over a five day period in which she con-
structed a nest containing seven provisioned cells. This example probably
represents the optimum conditions, for the five days were near the peak of the
nesting season, pollen sources were abundant, and weather conditions were
ideal with sunny skies and temperatures of 85-90 degrees daily. Under these
conditions, the bee was active nearly twelve hours daily and completed an ave-
rage of two cells per day. (The seasonal mean number of cells constructed
per day per bee was about 0.9 in 1963 and 1.1 in 1964.) The average number of
trips for pollen to provision a single cell was 17 (range 13-19). The total of 115
pollen provisioning trips accounted for 55% of this bee's nest-building time.
Little provisioning data were obtained for the Oregon bees, and the records
represent only a few hours' observation; however, some inferences may be
drawn. In general, the number of pollen foraging trips per cell was greater
for the Oregon nests, there being no less than 41 consecutive trips by one bee,
all apparently for the same cell. The most pollen trips for a single day by a
Michigan Heriades was only 36. Also, both the pollen and resin foraging trips
were of noticeably shorter duration for the Oregon bees. It is unfortunate that
a more complete picture of the adult nesting activities of Oregon Heriades is
not available.
Pollen Placement Behavior. Upon returning with pollen, the bee enters the
bore head first and incorporates the pollen deposited the previous trip into the
mass, probably adding nectar at this time. Chewing back and forth, typewriter-
fashion, the bee works rapidly and rhythmically from the base to the top of the
mass. During this process, the bee's face and mandibles become covered with
pollen dust, so she often grooms momentarily before backing out to unload the
pollen. The time spent incorporating pollen into the mass was relatively
constant, ranging from 23" to 1'30" (average, 52").
When crawling along the bore either frontwards or backwards, the female
rarely travels in a straight line, but rather from side to side and occasionally
completely around the bore. Crawling backwards was two to three times slower
than crawling frontwards, or even slower when the bee was heavily laden with
pollen. Since the 1/8 inch diameter bores were too small to permit the bees to
turn around inside, they were forced to come outside, turn around, and back
down the bore in order to unload pollen. However, those Heriades in Oregon
which nested in bores of larger diameter were able to turn around inside and
thus did not exhibit this behavior.
To remove the pollen from her scopa the female crawls backwards until the
tip of her abdomen touches the pollen mass, then, balancing on the front two
pair of legs, frog-kicks both legs together and simultaneously bends her abdomen
downward stiffly into the thrust. She continues kicking about 23" (range 16" -
1'41"), When the pollen is largely removed from the scopa she moves forward
about 1/8 inch, brushes the hind tarsi together, removing any pollen that may
have clung to them, then crawls out, occasionally stopping to groom.
The completed pollen mass, situated against the lower cell partition, fills
about two-thirds of the average cell and is thoroughly mixed with nectar, form-
ing a compact mass. The freshly completed provisions are firm and pliable and
hold shape well. The mass of staghorn sumac pollen was yellow-orange, but in
other localities the pollen color would depend on the kind used. Usually the pol-
len at the bottom and sides of the cell is not wholly incorporated into the mass,
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent.Inst., vol. 1, no, 3, 1965
retaining its powdery looseness and appearing as a lining into which the mass
fits; apparently the females find it difficult to work the loose pollen from the
cracks and crevices of the bore into the mass. This lining is usually quite
obvious in fresh provisions since it tends to be distinctly lighter than the pollen
to which nectar has been added.
Construction of Cell Partition. After storing pollen, the bee begins to bring
resin. In Michigan, resin must have been relatively close and readily available,
for the bee required only about five minutes (4'47") to obtain it. The source of
the resin remains unknown but it may, in part, have come from the sumac.
Taylor (1962) reports that H. freygessneri used pine resin and the nests had a
distinct pine odor, but no pine was present in the nesting vicinity here.
The number of resin-gathering trips per cell varied greatly (range 7-25).
The duration of the trips also varied, but the 57 resin trips for the nest in Fig-
ure ll (not including trips for resin used in the nest cap) accounted for 21% of
the nest construction time.
The resin brought before egg-laying was placed around the bore 3-4 mm he-
yond the edge of the pollen mass, forming a circular rim. Successive resin
placement and rim construction are illustrated in Figure 12. Often the bee used
her front feet to remove the resin from her mandibles, and generally she spent
several minutes molding the resin and working it around the rim, finally leaving
only a hole large enough to pass through. . :
Trips for resin following egg-laying were characteristically fewer, of short-
er duration, and more regular than those made prior to egg-laying. One repre-
sentative example, Table 2, compares gathering of resin before and after ovi-
position.
Oviposition. The behavior connected with egg-laying was observed several
times in Saran-covered nests. Instead of leaving the nest after disposing of the ©
pollen or resin in the usual manner, the bee moves forward and begins to chew
vigorously at the outermost portion of the pollen. This chewing continues for
several minutes (6'30" average), taking one or more short pauses to clean and
groom. Chewing apparently adds nectar, for when the female has finished, the
pollen has a soupy consistency in the area where the egg is to be laid.
Next, the bee backs out of the nest, turns around, and backs in until her ab-
domen touches the pollen mass. For 13 to 25 seconds, her abdomen makes
several noticeable rhythmic contractions. Then the egg begins to appear and
the abdomen remains practically motionless for the 20 to 35 seconds during
which the single egg is deposited, attached by one end to the pollen mass. The
female then quickly crawls out, turns around, and re-enters head first. Usually
she pokes her head through the aperature and touches the pollen mass and egg
with her antennae. This behavior is brief and the female turns almost immed-
iately to chewing at the resin partition base, moving resin chunks and remolding
the resin to close off the cell partition. Usually there is not enough resin avail-
able to completely close the cell and additional trips to gather resin are neces-
sary. However, on at least two recorded occasions, Heriades completed the
cell partition using only the resin brought prior to oviposition.
Egg-laying occurred whenever the pollen mass was complete and the resin
ring formed, and was observed as early as 9:00 a.m. and as late as 6:49 p.m.
Generally, resin was brought to the nest on the last trip before egg-laying.
Occasionally, however, the bee switched back to pollen after several resin
trips (see cells 2,3, 4, in Figure ll) and oviposited following a pollen trip.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata i
TABLE 2
Resin foraging trips before and after oviposition
Before evipoenign After oviposition Totals
] 7 C38" 4 229" o'32"
2 3 3'29" 4 2 ol 2'56"
3 3) o'O7" ] 2'44" 4'35"
4 6 4'10" 4 3148" 3'99"
o 20 2'09" o 201° 4'595"
6 6 2'09" O 5'09" 2'09"
“4 7 7'46" 2 2129) 20"
Average 8.1 dae) 3.6 3'06" : 4'47"
Cap Base Construction. As Figure 1] illustrates, the last few foraging
trips of the afternoon invariably were for resin, regardless of the cell's stage
of construction. All bees observed began bringing it almost simultaneously,
but the resin was disposed of in different ways. Often it was used to lay a cell
partition foundation. Sometimes it was placed in chunks apparently randomly
along the bore. In Saran-covered nests it frequently was used to caulk along
the junction of the Saran and bore, particularly when the Saran did not tightly
cover the nest.
Sometime during nest construction and almost invariably in late afternoon
a circular base of resin was laid just inside the nest entrance. This often in-
complete rim of resin, which forms the foundation for the nest closing plug, I
have termed the "cap base". The early formation of such a cap base, often sev-
eral days before the nest is actually completed, seems to be a unique feature to
H. carinata and its characteristic appearance just inside the nest entrance was
‘sometimes the first sign that Heriades was nesting. (In only three instances, the
closure was not preceded by cap base construction.) Taylor (1962) does not men-
tion any similar phenomenon for H. freygessneri; for that species, the nest clos-
ure apparently is not begun until the nest is finally capped. |
Cap base construction occurred any time from the first to the last day of
nest construction. In one instance the cap base was even constructed before any
pollen had been stored. In the example noted (Figure 11) the cap base was form-
ed during the fourth day of construction. Bees occasionally were observed to
add resin on successive days, increasing the size and extent of the cap base, but
generally it was constructed in a single afternoon and remained unchanged until
the nest was finally capped. Only once was a bee observed to remove resin from
the cap base for use in a cell partition.
Nest Closure. Heriades began adding more resin to the cap base, first to
one side of the bore, then to the other, until the resin plug became nearly flush
with the entrance. In about half of the nests constructed in both Michigan and
Oregon, the bees stuffed sand grains, paint chips, dirt, slivers of wood, dried
plant fragments, and other miscellaneous detritus into the nest entrance, stick-
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
ing them to the outer surface of the resin cap plug. Often the fragment was
larger than the bee and, after unsuccessful attempts at maneuvering, she
abandoned it. |
The materials were usually from the immediate vicinity, often debris which
had accumulated in the crevices of the surface on which the nests rested. One
bee made 26 consecutive trips to the same crack 1.5 feet from the nest. On
other occasions, bees were observed to enter an unused bore, grasp a project-
ing splinter with their mandibles, tear it loose, and transport it back to their
nest. Sometimes after stuffing the end, the bees brought more resin and pack-
ed it around the debris. The time occupied in nest closure ranged from about
two hours to two or three days.
Stuffing the nest entrance with detritus has been noted for a variety of soli-
tary Aculeata, and generally is considered a nest camouflage adaptation. This
may well be the case for H. carinata also.
Nest Defense. The close proximity of the nest blocks, with the consequent
nesting of several females in a small area, probably increased the number of
intraspecific encounters. In some instances when two female Heriades return-
ed to (or occasionally left from) their nests simultaneously, they scuffled
briefly; usually these struggles were short and both bees immediately returned
to their nests. Occasionally after such scuffles one or both bees showed reluc-
tance to leave the nest, remaining inside for periods up to 45 minutes, the
greater part of the time being spent poised just inside the entrance. Taylor
(1962) notes similar behavior by H. freygessneri.
Sometimes a female searching for a nest site entered the nest of another
Heriades and crawled down the bore, feeling with her antennae as she went.
Upon touching the owner bee or cell provisions, the intruder rapidly backed out
and flew to another nest. The owner bee usually seemed undisturbed and con-
tinued as though nothing had happened. In the only observed instance of Heriades
entering the nest of another species, the behavior exhibited was essentially the
same.
If the owner bee was away when the intruder entered and returned while the
intruder was still in the nest, a struggle nearly always ensued. Only once was
the owner observed to permit the intruder to leave its nest without a fight. In
one instance involving marked bees, neither gave any ground at first, but soon
the owner succeeded in forcing the intruder down into the bore, badly disrupting
and scattering the pollen. Then the owner backed nearly to the entrance and
stopped; when the intruder, following close behind, backed into her, the owner's
mancaibles opened as though to bite the intruder's abdomen and in apparent re-
sponse the intruder moved back down the bore. The owner then left the nest,
permitting the intruder to exit, and immediately re-entered without giving further
chase. Without hesitation she began to repair the damage and later that day com-
pleted the cell and capped the nest. The entire episode occurred within four min-
utes.
On another occasion a marked intruder bee blocked the entrance for 7 minutes,
preventing the returning bee from entering until she finally rushed in, locked
mandibles with the intruder, and dragged her out. This owner did not continue
provisioning activities but rested at the entrance for over 16 minutes before re-
versing to unload her pollen; another 29 minutes elapsed before she finally left
the nest.
Sometimes a distinctly audible buzzing sound was heard during these encoun-
ters, apparently emitted by both bees as they stood deadlocked midway along the
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 13
bore. Avery similar buzz can be induced when a bee is ee tightly be-
tween the thumb and first finger.
Nest Raiding and Supersedure. A puzzling phenomenon noted in both Mich-
igan and Oregon was the break-in and take-over of nests previously completed
by Heriades. This usually occurred within one or two days after the nest was
completed. Why the bees would raid nests of their own species when numerous
nest sites are available is very perplexing. Malyshev (1935) noted this phenom-
enon when the bees were.nesting in close proximity but suggested it might be due
to senility in the participating bees. Fabre (1914), noting it in Osmia tricornis
Latreille, suggested that the bees' ovaries were exhausted.
Twenty-four hours after the original female was collected from a finished
nest in Oregon, a second female Heriades was discovered removing the nest
cap piece by piece and sticking the pieces around the entrance (Figure l).
Usually she would bite off a small resin chunk, back up slightly, scrape her
mandibles with her front legs, then pass the resin back to her hind legs and
kick it off. Sometimes she carried the resin outside and deposited it on the
nest face without the aid of her feet. After an aperature large enough to allow
her body through was chewed out of the cap, she broke into the last cell and
cleared out the egg and provisions. Following a night spent in the nest, she
brought fresh pollen and remade the last cell; the next morning she capped the
nest using both freshly obtained resin and old particles from the nest face.
About twenty-four hours later, a third female was found breaking into the nest
in the same manner. Five days later she finished restocking and recapping the
nest. This raiding occurred during the peak of the nesting season, and the last
cell contained a prépupa when opened so at least the third female was still pro-
ducing viable eggs.
Another example of raiding was observed in Michigan shortly after the peak
of the nesting season. One marked female, known to have constructed eleven
cells, was found breaking into the outermost cell in a Saran-covered nest capped
only an hour earlier. She destroyed the egg, laid another, and resealed the cell;
then, before recapping, she constructed two more cells and began a third. The
female was much slower in this than in previous nest building, requiring ll days
to complete this nest whereas in earlier nests she had averaged nearly two cells
per day. The three eggs she laid were viable but the last cell, which appeared
nearly complete, contained no egg, suggesting that her ovaries may have become
exhausted.
Nest raiding may also take the form of appropriation of incomplete nests
from other Heriades. In one example involving marked bees in a Saran-covered
nest, the original Heriades was provisioning the first cell at 2:30 p.m.; by 7:00
p.m. the first cell was complete and an egg laid, but a different bee (which had
capped another nest earlier in the afternoon) was resting in the nest. This
second bee completed six additional cells and capped the nest.
On other occasions, two bees, apparently owner and intruder, were noted
deadlocked in nests. Often afterwards, the pollen in the last cell (in one case,
last three cells) was in a pile below the nest entrance; subsequently, the cell
was restocked and completed. Piles of pollen below nest entrances were noted
on several occasions throughout the nesting season in both Oregon and Michigan,
and whether each was the result of a nest takeover or struggle is uncertain.
Occasionally, nests were found which were begun by some other solitary bee
or wasp and superseded by Heriades. Since this behavior was never observed,
whether the original occupant abandoned the nest or was forced out by Heriades
14 Contrib. Amer, Ent, Inst., vol. 1, no. 3,1965
is unknown. None of the cells of the superseded nests appeared to have been
first cleared out by H. carinata, although Taylor (1862) reports that this is
usually the case for H. freygessneri when superseding Megachile gratiosa nests.
Superseded nests, the original occupants and number of cells completed by
- each are listed in Table 3. In four of the six Oregon usurpations, Heriades
constructed no basal partition for her own series of cells. In the other two cases
she left a space, then constructed a resin plug before her cells. In the one
Michigan case, Heriades deposited its pollen mass directly on the incomplete
pollen mass which the original occupant deserted seven days earlier. This
one case, at least, was clearly abandonment. | :
! Heriades' chief competitor for 1/6 inch diameter bores in Michigan was a
sphecic wasp, Soleriella sp. A quick and efficient nest builder, this wasp was
able to complete two or three nests to every one of Heriades. Of lesser impor-
tance as competitors were bees of the genus Hylaeus. Only once was a nest of
Heriades superseded, apparently by Trypoxylon. This nest contained five com-
pleted Heriades cells and some pollen in the bottom of a sixth; in this same cell
were numerous spider remains (the prey used by Trypoxylon) and a Chrysidid
parasite cocoon. A thin mua partition sealed cell six and served as the only
nest cap, although it was quite far in from the entrance.
Miscellaneous Behavior. A notable feature of the behavior of some bees
was the repeated return to nests which they had constructed previously. For
nine days one marked bee returned several times daily to its first nest, al-
though during this time she constructed two subsequent nests. These visits
were short, the bee only hovering (or occasionally alighting) momentarily be-
fore returning to the nest currently under construction. These trips occurred
TABLE 3
Nest supersedure by H. carinata
Cells by | Cells by
Original
riginal occupant first occupant | H. carinata
Hylaeus sp.
Hylaeus sp.
Hylaeus sp.
i
3
: 4
Osmia (Chalcosmia) coerulescens (L.) 4
2
2
Oregon
Megachile (Chelostomoides) angelarum Ckll.
Osmia (Nothosmia) sp. ;
Oo Wat - C1
Hylaeus sp. a : ]
Mich. |
* last constructed cell incomplete
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 15
only when returning to the nest from foraging trips, perhaps serving to orient
the bee to its new nest. However, since this behavior did not occur after every
foraging trip, it may have been the result of conditioning.
On several occasions, Heriades alighted on me to suck my perspiration, or
crawled slowly about the surface of a recently handled nest block avidly licking
the surface, apparently also for perspiration. This behavior, which appeared
to be initiated by chance discovery, often lasted for several minutes and provid-
ed an excellent opportunity to mark the bees. At one point, nearly half the bees
nesting at site 3 had been marked in this manner.
Period of Daily Activity. On warm sunny days, H. carinata was active from
early morning to late afternoon, beginning as early as 7:30 a.m. and ending
about 7:00 p.m. Under less optimal conditions the period of daily activity was
proportionately shortened. Apparently the bees exhibit a kind of circadien rhy-
thm or diurnal periodicity, for bees kept in a cage in the laboratory were very
active between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. but at night showed no activity or response
even though the lab lights burned late.
On overcast but mild days, the bees were still active, though not as early
and sometimes only intermittently; strong wind had a very pronounced effect on
flight control and undoubtedly decreased provisioning efficiency. When it rained
the bees ceased activity entirely and remained in their nests.
Between June 23 and July 18, rain fell on six days in 1963, compared with 15
days in 1964. Of the 19 nesting attempts for 1964, eight were incomplete and
three of these contained dead females. Several of the other incomplete nests
were abandoned during one of these rainy periods. The poor nesting in 1964 is
probably attributable to the increased precipitation, for only two nests were hbe-
gun after the very rainy first week in July.
Females constructing nests invariably spent the night just inside the nest
entrance until nest capping, when not enough space remained to permit them
inside. Then they often rested in a nearby empty bore. Their "sleeping position"
was head first in the bore, abdomen blocking the entrance (just inside the rim of
resin when the cap base was present). On rare occasions the bees were found
reversed, with head facing out, but still just inside the entrance. Heriades was
never observed to rest farther down inside the bore or to curl against the pollen
mass. This "sleeping position" afforded an easy means of determining when a
nest was occupied.
No field evidence regarding how males spent the night was obtained. Step
(1932) reports finding males, and sometimes females, of a European species of
Heriades curled in a ball asleep in a flower or clinging by their mandibles to a
twig or grass stem. In cages, both males and females curled up, often in groups,
in one of the corners of the cage. Although grass was present, it was not util-
ized.
Generally, all bees at a nest site became active within a period of about half
an hour in the early morning, probably in response to temperature or a combin-
ation of temperature and light. The possible occurrence of an orientation flight
was difficult to perceive, for the bee, being small and black, is difficult to
follow and quickly disappears from view. Nest construction is immediately be-
_gun where it left off the previous afternoon.
At day's end, the bee simply ceases to leave the nest, often working down in-
side the bore for long periods after the last foraging trip. Usually her behavior
gives no indication that activity is about to cease. On two occasions, however,
a very striking and unusual behavior was noted. In both instances, the bee left
its nest, alighted nearby, and stood motionless with antennae erect, as though
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
sensing weather conditions. The bees remained in this position less thana
minute, then returned immediately to the nest. A short while later both were
in the nocturnal resting position. Once, avery soft, rather high-pitched contin-
uous buzz like the hum of a small motor was emitted by the bee during this be-
havior, although no motion was perceived. The motionless, antennae erect,
position assumed by the bees was most striking, resembling no other aspect of
the bees' behavior.
Nest Structure. The typical H. carinata nest (Figures 3 and 4) consists of a
linear series of cells followed by an empty space (the vestibule cell) and the nest
cap. Resin partitions 0.5 to 1.0 mm thick separate the cells. The freshly
opened nest containing diapausing larvae is readily identified by the distinctive
feces-covered cocoons, their associated operimenta, and the resin partitions.
Fischer (1955), noting the presence of a cellophane-like material covering
the inner side of the cell partitions in a H. variolosa nest, termed it the cap
support, presuming the mother bee constructed it prior to the cell partition.
However, this study has revealed it to be secreted by the larva prior to cocoon
spinning (see section on larval development) and in order to avoid confusion
with the term "cap base" it is deemed best to rename it the "operimentum".
The operimentum (Figure 5) appears as a thin hyaline cover extending in-
ward from the partition around the bore about 1-3 mm and resembles the se-
cretion used by Hylaeus to line their cells. Against the Saran the operimentum
is barely perceptable but is readily seen if the Saran is peeled away. Taylor
(1962) notes no similar structure in nests of H. freygessneri.
The vestibule cell which usually characterized H. carinata nests was occa-
sionally lacking; in these cases, the last cell partition was often thickened like
anormal nest cap. Of the 33 completed Oregon nests, 10 lacked the vestibule
cell, while only 2 of the 56 completed Michigan nests did. In a few nests, two
vestibule cells were found; in others, varying amounts of pollen were stored in
the bottom of the vestibule cell but no egg laid.
The resin used by H. carinata for partitions and nest cap was pure, and an
outer ring of sand and soil such as reported for H. variolosa partitions (Fischer,
1955) was never present. Rarely, splinters of wood or other fragments were
incorporated into the cell partitions. The resin source remained undiscovered,
but two different types (oxblood-red and whitish-translucent) were used in the
Michigan nests; 35 nests employed the reddish resin, 26 the whitish, and 9 were
weak red, as though the resin were a mixture of the two. In general, the resin
in a nest was consistently of one type or the other, but 6 nests contained resin of
both colors. In the Oregon nests, the resin used was whitish-translucent through-
out. |
The nest caps, which are much thicker than the cell partitions, were consis-
tently constructed more or less flush with the nest entrance by both populations.
About half of those nests occupying the entire bore contained a plug of resin 0.5
to 6.0 mm thick at the inner end, probably a phenomenon of the irregular bot-
toms of the trap-nests, but perhaps a function of the time of day since the bees
tended to carry resin exclusively in the late afternoon. Occasionally, nests did
not utilize the entire bore; in these cases, a resin partition part way along the
bore was first constructed as a base for the cell series.
The average number of provisioned cells per completed nest for the Oregon
population was 6.4 (range 2-13) and for the Michigan population, both years com-
bined, was 4.6 (range 1-10). Inversely related to this was the average length of
the vestibule cells, 47.9 mm (range 10.0-89.0 mm) in the Michigan nests (Fig-
ure 4) and 13.0 mm (range 4.5-55.0 mm) for the Oregon nests (Figure 3). |
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 17
TABLE 4
Comparison of volume (cok of provisioned cells and nest caps
for Michigan and Oregon nests using Student's t-test
Mean volumes
©
Provisioned cells! 1252 . 1067 . 1145 8. 3484**
Population mean t-value
0337 0925 12. 6556**
Nest éape . 0900
243 provisioned Michigan cells in 1/8 inch diameter bores; 175 provisioned Ore-
gon cells in 9/64 inch diameter bores.
248 in Michigan; 24 in Oregon.
kk
Significantly different at 1% level
Drawing meaningful conclusions on the basis of these figures alone is difficult
since the bore lengths of the preferred 1/8 and 9/64 inch bores differed by 30 mm.
However, more striking are comparisons of the average volumes of the provi-
sioned cells and nest caps since they should not depend on bore length. Table 4
shows that the Oregon population constructed significantly larger cells and nest
caps.
A possible explanation for the greater number of cells of larger size per
nest in the Oregon nests is that more time was spent on cell construction by the
Oregon bees. By dividing the total days spent in construction by the number of
provisioned cells, a rough average of 2.7 days per cell in Oregon and 1.1 days
per cell in Michigan is obtained. However, the time required for cell construc-
tion varied from a minimum of just under four hours to several days, and in one
instance of bad weather over six days were required to complete one cell.
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Techniques of Study. Records of the developmental stages of Heriades cari-
nata were taken primarily from Saran-covered nests which permitted ready, easy
observation under as nearly normal conditions as possible with minimum disturb-
ance to the cells. To enhance visibility, the Saran was often pulled back or re-
moved during observations. The technique also lent itself nicely to photography
of the various stages in situ. Some problems with mold were encountered, par-
ticularly with nests which had been exposed to heavy rain, but it could be checked
by manual removal and temporary exposure of the nests to permit drying.
All developmental data were obtained at room temperature. Most larvae were
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
observed once daily, so timing accuracy for certain activities was not always
precise. Gently dusting the larvae with dry pollen grains, thereby "marking"
them, yielded the information on number and duration of larval stages.
The Egg. Deposited on the outer surface of the provisions (Figure 13), the
egg is cream-colored, opaque, smooth and shiny. It is cylindrical, slightly
curved with both ends uniformly rounded, and measures 2-2. 3 mm long and
0.75 mm in diameter at the middle (Figure Lo);
The incubation period is about 51/2 days. By 48 hours after deposition, the
egg's cloudy contents pull away from both ends and become concentrated in the
central portion. The ends become translucent and in the free end a faint inter-
nal constriction is evident. By 96 hours, the chorion becomes constricted at
the same point, forming a distinct nipple which ultimately will become the larval
head. Also at this time, segmentation begins to appear. Regular pulsating
movements originating at the attached end are evident along the length of the
egg, anda more rapid localized throbbing can be seen in the head. By about
120 hours, the free end slumps downward until the egg lies at full length on the
pollen (Figure 14).. Determining exactly when the chorion is shed is difficult,
but shortly after hatching the intestinal tract becomes yellow from the ingested
pollen.
The Larva. The mature larva (Figure 18) is a legless whitish grub. Dull
yellowish for the first day or two after hatching, it gradually becomes dull gray-
ish white and three to four days after hatching small sub-cuticular white spots
become evident through the integument. These remain throughout the feeding
period of the larva, increasing in size to maturity, and are still apparent after
pupation though they disappear soon after.
The number of larval instars was not definitely fee anined but there are at
least four. Throughout the first two instars the larva remains attached to the
pollen mass, little changed in position from the slumped egg. Probably asa
result, the early larval development proceeds quite uniformly and it is easy to
determine when a molt occurs. From the onset of defecation following the sec-
ond molt to maturity the larva moves about considerably and the posterior por-
tion of its body is no longer in contact with the pollen mass. There is consider-
able individual variability in the rate of development, and it becomes increas-
ingly difficult to perceive molts even if the larva is dusted with pollen. Furth-
ermore, there was some evidence that the later larval exuviae are eaten soon
after ecdysis, while the earlier ones are not.
The first and second larval stadia are each about two days in duration. The
length of the third and fourth stadia is less certain, appearing to vary greatly.
The body and head setae become apparent for the first time after the second
molt. Defecation begins within one or two days after the second molt, or an ave-
rage of about 6 days (range 4-11) after hatching. Grandi (1934) mentions that
defecation in a European species of Heriades began five days after hatching. The
brownish-yellow feces are cylindrical, slightly curved, firm and quite uniform,
approximately 0.75 mm long and 0.25 mm wide. The first produced are slightly
smaller and often pointed at one end. Occasionally, a longer spiraled excrement
having two or three coils was found. At the onset of defecation usually less than
half the pollen mass had been consumed. The feces are produced copiously
throughout the remainder of larval development, ceasing about midway through
cocoon spinning.
At an average of 14 days (range 9-22) after hatching, or about 7 1/2 days
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata Ry)
after the onset of defecation, the larva halts feeding temporarily, reverses
itself, and spins the operimentum. Although this unique structure was usually
recognizable after one day's spinning, often the larva returned to it intermit-
tently on subsequent days, adding noticeably to it until feeding was completed.
Other times no further work was observed after the original construction.
When the operimentum is spun, approximately 1-2 mm of pollen remain to be
consumed; after it is spun, the larva resumes feeding.
The operimentum is probably spun during the fourth instar stage but the
data are inconclusive. Apparent third molts have been noted for a few larvae
following the onset of defecation, but before operimentum construction, between
two and nine days after the second molt was recorded.
Cocoon construction is initiated by the mature larva an average of 20 days
(range 15-33) after egg hatching; the pollen mass was usually completely consum-
ed but not infrequently some pollen was left untouched and the cocoon construc-
ted above it. The transition from feeding to cocoon construction was not abrupt;
random threads criss-crossing the cell usually appeared a few days before feed-
ing terminated.
The cocoons (Figure 6) are cylindrical with rounded ends, lacking any con-
spicuous nipple on the anterior end as found in many Megachilidae. The cocoon,
thin and flexible, semi-opaque with a shiny glazed appearance, is embedded in
a matrix of loose threads to which the feces adhere uniformly. The texture of
the H. carinata cocoon, unlike H. variolosa (Fischer, 1955), is very similar to
that of the operimentum, resembling crinkled cellophane. It does not appear
to be composed of layers of different thicknesses and texture; neither is the co-
coon impregnated with any liquids to give it color or rigidity as with other mega-
chilids, including its parasite Stelis vernalis. When the cocoon does not fill
the entire cell, its posterior end is against the innermost partition, leaving a
small space between the anterior end and the outer partition, sparsely criss-
crossed with threads attaching the cocoon to the operimentum and cell walls.
The feces become intertwined into a mass at either end of the cell through a
sort of net spun over them in the first stages of cocoon construction. The mat-
erial used is exuded continuously from the salivary slit; as the larva moves
about, the pellets are caught up, dragged along, and pulled up into new positions
where subsequent strands secure them firmly to the matrix and cocoon. The
continual twisting and turning of the larval body thus distributes the feces more
or less uniformly over the outer surface of the cocoon.
To determine when defecation ceased and to see what effect lack of feces and
operimentum would have on cocoon construction and larval orientation, larvae
in various stages of cocoon construction were transferred to empty cells where
they subsequently began new cocoons. Few larvae were available, but some in-
ferences may be drawn. In one instance, a larva was placed in a cleared
Heriades-made cell after its feeding had ceased but prior to discernable cocoon
spinning; by one day later, the larva had enclosed itself in a flimsy cocoon
and between 30 and 40 fecal pellets had been passed. At this point the cell
was again completely cleared and the naked larva replaced; twenty-four
hours later, another flimsy cocoon had been spun in about the same posi-
tion as the first, but very few fecal pellets had been passed. The cocoon was
then allowed to go to completion; though lacking the feces blanket, it otherwise
appeared identical to the normal cocoon and the larva was correctly oriented.
Most other larval transplants showed similar results. However, in one instance
the larva constructed operimenta which coated the inner side of both partitions.
The cocoon was constructed in the center of the cell with 1-2 mm between the
ends of the cocoon and the cell partitions. However, the larva was correctly
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
oriented.
Misoriented larvae are so rare that correct orientation cannot be explained
solely on the basis of chance. However, the partitions between the cells are of
amorphous resin with no concave or convex sides like the mud partitions shown
by Cooper (1957) to be the cue to the larval orientation for certain Eumenine
wasps. The operimentum, spun by the Heriades larva while the pollen remains
in the bottom of the cell, covers the inner side of the only exposed cell parti-
tion, the one capping the cell. When the operimentum covered the inner sides
of both partitions, the cocoon was not situated against either partition but about
equidistant from each; furthermore, when the cocoon does not fill the cell, the
space between the anterior end of the cocoon and the cell cap is invariably left.
Therefore, it seems logical to postulate that the operimentum serves as a vital
cue to the larva in cocoon positioning and orientation.
Cocoons were completed in an average of 7 days (range 3-11) after feeding
terminated. Following cocoon completion, the larvae lay motionless for up to
24 hours; during this time, no spinning was done but the mandibles would open
and close in response to probing. Then, transformation to the prepupal position
occurred, the larva's anterior end bending back upon itself and the larva assum-
ing a hooked or C-position (Figure 7). No molt accompanies this transformation,
and the prepupa no longer shows any response to probing.
The total period of larval development averaged 30 days (range 20-41); thus
by the second week of August in Michigan, the last H. carinata larvae were in
the prepupal overwintering stage. Itis of note that H. freygessneri overwin-
ters in the pupal stage (Taylor, 1962).
Description of Mature Larva. [llustrations and techniques used follow the
system of Michener (1953). The larva closely resembles H. crenulatus Nylan-
der, described by Grandi (1934), except for the lack of atrial teeth and mandib-
ular serrations. Many of the larval characters are in agreement with those of
the Anthidiini, especially the mandibular serrations. The presence of labral
papillae has also been noted in Hoplitus and Stelis (Michener, 1953).
Body (Figure 18) non-pigmented, with abundant setae; posterior end swollen,
tapered anteriorly. Thoracic and anterior abdominal segments dorsally divid-
ed into cephalic and caudal annulets; other segments less distinctly divided.
Ventrolateral swellings absent or only feebly present. Spiracular atria (Figure
23) projecting slightly above integument, lacking spins or teeth but bearing a
few internal ridges; primary tracheal opening large with thickened collar.
Head capsule (Figures 19 and 20) with scattered setae, non-pigmented except
for mandible tips; marginal thickening distinct. Antennal papillae on slight
prominences, more than twice as long as broad, with three smaller peg-like
papillae at apex. Labro-clypeal suture moderately arched, weakened medially,
appearing wrinkled; epistomal suture indistinct. Labrum strongly emarginate
at apex, bearing row of 6 or 7 minute peg-like papillae along apical margin, ex-
tending laterally in irregular row of 7 or 8 on each side. Mandibles (Figures 21
and 22) bidentate, margin of inner tooth with minute blunt serrations; teeth
acute, inner half as long as outer. Inner apical concavity distinct, delimited
by well-defined transverse ridge. Maxillary and labial palpi similar and dis-
tinct, twice as long as broad, each with 2 smaller peg-like papillae at apex;
maxillary palpi pre-apical. Salivary opening transverse, strongly protuberant
with long narrow lips. Tentorium complete but tentorial bridge weak medially.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata al
TABLE 5
Post-diapause development for Michigan H. carinata
refrigerated 115 days, then maintained at 729 F.
Nest, cell] Pupation Wings | Adult | Total
and sex expand | emerges | days —
Nest 1
l 4]
3 39
4 37
D
6 37
Nest 2
1 37
2 37
Nest 3
i Dare
2
3 36
Nest 4
2 43
Nest 5
2 37
S 85
Nest 6
l 39
3
Nest 7
l
2 ot
3 33
4 Se
6 33
Nest 8
4. 33
+died
- inaccurate timing
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
Post-diapause Development. In nests kept outside over the 1963-1964
winter, pupation began May 20, the first adults emerging on June 23; thus
the post-pupation development in 1964 required about 35 days under natural
conditions. This compared with 22 days for laboratory-reared individuals.
No post-diapause developmental data for the Oregon population was obtained.
The pupal period of H. freygessneri (Taylor, 1962) varied from 22 to 138 days.
Much information on post-diapause development was obtained from prepupae
removed from their cocoons and reared in small gelatin capsules, a method
allowing more accurate comparative information on development rates between
sexes and within cell series. Observations were made but once daily, and so
do not account for slight timing differences. Table 5 summarizes the compar-
ative post-diapause development of six males and fifteen females; the progres-
sive stages of development listed are somewhat arbitrary but easily distinguished.
Just prior to pupation the prepupa elongates; its body contents shrink away
from the anterior end and a molt occurs. The newly formed pupa (Figure 8) is
white and glistening. Four to five days after pupation the eyes and ocelli turna
light cinnamon brown, becoming progressively darker to dark chocolate; at this
point, the remainder of the body begins to darken. The first body pigmentation
appears as faint gray areas in the head, thorax, and apical portions of the ab-
dominal terga, giving the abdomen a ringed appearance. Darkening to black
proceeds gradually throughout the body, the extremities of the legs, mouthparts,
and antennae being the last. Soon, the legs and antennae become free from the
body and respond to probing. Next, another molt occurs, accompanied by ex-
pansion of the wings; after a three day hardening period the adult chews out of
the cocoon.
The data in Table 5 indicate that post-diapause development proceeded
slightly faster throughout for males, with the cumulative effect that males ave-
raged five days earlier emergence than females. Because of individual varia-
tion, however, the first male to emerge preceeded the first female by only two
days.
Two general observations on emergence order within single nests have been
repeatedly noted in the literature --- males tend to emerge sooner than females,
and the adults closest to the nest entrance tend to emerge first, although they
are chronologically youn ger. Data in Table 5 further substantiate these findings.
Many investigators have also noted a relationship between sex and position in
the cell series, with males more commonly reared from the last-constructed
cells. Data in Table 6 generally support this relationship, although exceptions
occur. For example, in four nests female cells were interspersed among male
cells, and in one six-celled nest males occupied only the three innermost cells.
Another six-celled nest contained all females, but nonest contained only males.
The largest nest exhibited an alternation of sexes as follows: Cells 1-4, females;
cells 5-7, males; cells 8-ll, females; cells 12 and 13, males.
The rearing data are summarized in Table 7. The variation in sex ratio
from year to year is worth noting. In Oregon in 1962 the sex ratio was nearly
29:lc", while in Michigan in 1963 the ratio was almost 19:30". In 1964 the balance
was again reversed, over 29:lo’. The low rearing success may have affected the
sex ratio; however, the Oregon cells infested by the chalcid Mellitobia chalybii
Ashmead (laboratory contamination) and the mold-ruined Michigan cells probably
were affected at random. It seems -unlikely that the sex ratio would be greatly
changed had these events not occurred. Mortality rates in nature probably ap-
proach the same level.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 23
TABLE 6
Combined records of sex and position in cell series ©
for all reared H. carinata, Michigan and Oregon
Cell number from base to cap
SASS Se Ieee OR Et
TABLE 7
Rearing data for H. carinata from
09 Oregon and 77 Michigan nests
Michigan
1963
Percentage
1962
Cells unsuitable for rearing
BOY coc ic ais bec ey hee eee: 3.5
MGled ec ee ea eee 19.0%
Cells with unsuccessful rearing
Egg not laid or failed to hatch........ 18. 8%
Immature died, natural mortality..... 18.8%
Immature accidentally killed......... a
Cells with successful rearing
HH, COPMALA MIG. vase ce see 18.2%
He cavinatea females... 0. cu sa. 20. 4%
Melittobia chalybii Ashmead (Eulophidae) -
Stelis vernalis Mitchell (Megachilidae) 1.2%
Sapyga louisi Krombein (Sapygidae)..... 0.4%
+cells not included in percentage analysis
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
PARASITES
Table 7 lists the parasites reared in both Michigan and Oregon. The absence
of natural parasitism of Heriades in Oregon is puzzling; numerous chrysidids,
Coelioxys, Anthrax, and a few meloid beetles were reared from trap-nests con-
taining other solitary Aculeata at the same locations. Forty-six Oregon cells
contained Melittobia chalybii Ashmead; however, these records represent labor-
atory contamination, the small wasps entering the glass tubes through the gauze
covers and ovipositing in the developing pupae. As many as 249 adults (23999,
10 oo") were reared from a single parasitized nest. A common parasite of twig-
nesting Aculeata, this small chalcid has been reported by several investigators
to infest rearing chambers. Its biology is treated in detail by Buckell (1928).
Because of rearing mortality, more parasitism in Michigan was observed
than indicated in Table 7. In 1963, at least 9 cells were parasitized by Sapyga
and 7 by Stelis; one cell contained an egg of both of these parasites, but the
Sapyga egg failed to hatch. In 1964, 3 cells were known to be parasitized by
Stelis but none by Sapyga. |
Attempted parasitism by the large chalcoid wasp Leucospis affinis Say was
observed in three completed nests in 1963; however, mold destroyed the cell
contents. Medler (1958), reporting successful parasitism by L. affinis only
from trap-nests in sumac twigs, suggests that a maximum thickness of wood
exists through which the species can oviposit. It seems possible that the Her-
iades trap-nests were too thick for successful oviposition. vi
H. carinata represents the first host record for Stelis vernalis Mitchell;
furthermore, this apparently is also the first Heriades host record for any New
World species of Stelis. Stelis minima Schenck and S. pygmaea Schenck have
been recorded for the European species H. campanularum (Kirby) and H. trun-
corum (L.) respectively (Friese, 1923). Of reared S. vernalis, 5 were female
and 1 male; only one nest contained more than one cell parasitized by this species.
The behavior observed for S. vernalis adults and larvae parallels that report-
ed by Michener (1955) for Stelis lateralis; some additional behavioral observations
facilitated by the Saran-covered nests seem worth noting. In one instance, the
parasite was repeatedly observed in the vicinity; then, after a Heriades female
had accumulated a nearly complete pollen mass, the parasite entered the nest
while she was out and burrowed along one wall of the cell almost to the bottom of
the pollen mass. When Heriades returned and encountered the Stelis, she backed
out and flew off without unloading her pollen. The parasite, apparently undisturb-
ed, continued excavation, then backed out of the nest, re-entered abdomen first,
and oviposited quickly (5 seconds duration) at the bottom of the cavity in the pol-
len mass. She then crawled out, re-entered head first, and within less than one
minute replaced the pollen she had removed, completely covering the egg.
Heriades returned shortly, still laden with pollen, and entered. Apparently some-
thing seemed amiss, for an extremely long time (13'50") was spent chewing at
the pollen before she finally unloaded her scopa. After this, she remained rest-
ing inside 7 minutes, then commenced constructing the resin partition rim and
completed the cell in the normal manner.
In one rearing observed daily, this parasite completed its development with-
out feeding on the host, because the Heriades egg was preseverd before the Stelis
was discovered in the pollen mass. Thus, when the egg hatched in relation to
its host is unknown; however, the larva was first discovered six days after the
cell was completed, and was probably second instar at that time. Although smal-
ler, less robust, and with fewer sub-cuticular white spots, the Stelis larva
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 25
appeared otherwise quite similar to Heriades. The Stelis larva began to de-
fecate 6 days later. It fed for 19 days, at which time nearly all of the pollen
was consumed. Cocoon construction required 4 days; cocoon construction
method and structure match that described for S. lateralis (Michener, 1955).
The Heriades larvae in the same nest lagged 4-7 days behind in their develop-
ment. Post-diapause development could not be observed due to the opacity of
the cocoon, but emergence was two days later than Heriades of the same nest.
Heriades carinata is also the first host record for Sapyga louisi Krombein
although various species of Sapygidae are known to parasitize other Heriades
from Europe and Africa as well as other megachilid genera (Pate, 1947).
Individuals of S. louisi were seen repeatedly about one nest site in 1963, all
their parasitism occurring there after the first of July and continuing through
the remainder of the nesting season. Nest parasitism was observed twice,
neither instance in a Saran-covered nest; in both, the female was first observed
searching along a row of nest blocks, hovering momentarily at nearly every hole
and occasionally entering one. Finally, she entered an occupied nest head first,
quickly reappeared, turned around, and backed in abdomen first, probably ovi-
positing. After oviposition, the female did not re-enter head first as did Stelis,
but simply flew off. The total time inside the nest was about 15 seconds in
both instances.
Apparently there is only a limited period during which Sapyga can or will
parasitize a cell. In four parasitized cells, the egg was attached to the Heriades
egg (Figure 17) and in another, the egg was deposited on the Saran. In no case
were Sapyga eggs ever found in or on the pollen mass. Furthermore, in some
instances the parasite was observed to enter occupied nests but leave without
turning around for oviposition. Thus, it would seem that those Heriades which
complete the cell partition by remolding the resin brought prior to oviposition
would have a distinct advantage in avoiding this parasite.
Three of the five nests parasitized by S. louisi contained more than one para-
sitized cell, suggesting that this parasite may learn to recognize certain nests
and return to them repeatedly. This type of behavior, resulting in a high per-
centage of parasitism in some nests and complete absence in others, has been
noted by several investigators for parasites of non-gregarious bees.
The egg of Sapyga louisi (Figure 16) is slightly smaller than the Heriades
egg, measuring 1.5 mm long and 0.25 mm wide at the center. Cloudy white,
it is smooth, very slightly curved, tapering posteriorly to a blunt point and
rounded at the anterior end. The egg has a translucent area at the posterior
end, and a cement-like material attaches the posterior half to the substrate,
with the anterior end left free (Figure 17). Hatching occurs two days after ovi-
position.
In the first stage larva, segmentation is very apparent; the head is distinct
with prominent sickle-shaped mandibles. Shortly after hatching, the larva posi-
tions itself full length along the Heriades egg, punctures it, and sucks out the
contents. A molt then occurs and the larva subsequently devours the pollen pro-
visions; after an undetermined number of larval stadia, Sapyga spins a cocoon,
requiring 3-4 days to complete this task. With the first molt the sickle-shaped
mandibles are lost, and throughout the remainder of its development the larva
closely resembles the Heriades larva except for the absence of body setae.
The Sapyga larva begins defecating fecal pellets from 7-9 days after hatching
continuing until cocoon spinning. Larval development and cocoon spinning for
Sapyga were completed 7-10 days sooner than for Heriades of the same nest.
The thin and flimsy cocoon is an opaque satiny white; it consists of two sep-
arate layers, quite similar in texture and appearance and difficult to separate.
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
The cocoon does not appear to be impregnated with any fluid; a few feces are
distributed intermittently over its outer surface and incorporated into it. The
cocoon is snug to the base of the cell, with a space usually left between its an-
terior end and the cell partition.
The post-diapause development of the two reared S. louisi, both kept out-
side over the winter, was considerably slower than that of Heriades. A male
and a female S. louisi were reared; the male pupated 18 days after the Heriades
of the same nest had emerged, and remained in the pupal stage for 16 days, thus
following the Heriades emergence by 34 days. The female pupated 7 days later
than the male, but remained in the pupal stage for 40 days, thus emerging 62
days after the Heriades in the same nest. On the basis of this information it
would seem that S. louisi is not a very successful parasite of Heriades in nature,
except perhaps in the lowermost cells, for otherwise the diapausing prepupae
would be destroyed during emergence of the host.
Other parasites of Heriades recorded in the literature are Chrysis (Tetra-
chrysis) laetabilis Buysson (Chrysididae) and Anthrax triatomus Hesse (Bom-
byliidae), both parasitic on H. freygessneri (Taylor, 1962), and Anthrax
aethiops Fabricus on H. truncorum (Laboulbene, 1873). Héppner (1904) lists
H. truncorum and H. florisomnis (L.) as hosts of Gasteruption jaculator L.
(Gasteruptionidae). Grandi (1934) records Melittobia acasta (Walker) (Eulo-
phidae) from a nest of Heriades in Europe.
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
Heriades carinata is considered of little importance as a crop pollinator;
however, knowledge of the details of its life history is particularly significant,
not only because it helps to fill existing lacunae, but because it may point the
direction to further fruitful study.
The significance of the early cap base construction is interesting to specu-
late upon for, neither blocking nor concealing the nest entrance, the cap base
is probably of little importance as a parasite preventative. Perhaps itis a
phenomenon of the late afternoon resin-carrying tendency, deposited at the
entrance for lack of another suitable place, but it may help to prevent nest
flooding under natural conditions.
Another interesting phenomenon is the operimentum construction; especially
significant are the facts that the larva stops to construct the operimentum before
completing its development, and that the cocoon, when filling less than the en-
tire cell, always is against the opposite partition. These suggest that the oper- |
imentum is a significant clue to correct larval orientation. It is strange, in
view of its obvious selective importance, that the whole problem of larval orien-
tation in solitary twig-nesting bees has been largely ignored.
Differences in nest structure, adult behavior, and period of seasonal activity
are striking between the Michigan and Oregon populations. Since H. carinata
occurs throughout much of North America, additional study and biological data
from other localities, along with a thorough study of morphological variability,
might suggest sufficient criteria for distinguishing one or more subspecies.
Because the species so readily accepts trap-nests, biological data would not be
difficult to obtain. Rearing under carefully controlled environmental conditions
and breeding experiments between populations might provide enlightening clues
to the extent of genetic divergence present.
Matthews: Biology of Heriades carinata 27
The phenomenon of nest-raiding is also worthy of further investigation;
perhaps this type of behavior is somehow related to the development of the
parasitic habit which has apparently risen independently in the various phyletic
lines of the Megachilidae.
Further investigation on flower relationships in different localities is sorely
needed. It seems unlikely that H. carinata is ever solely oligolectic; rather it
probably exhibits a decided preference for a particular type of pollen as long
as it remains abundant. Knowledge of the kinds of resin utilized and the man-
ner in which resin is obtained would also be valuable.
Furthermore, the complete absence in the trap-nests of Heriades variolosa
the other wide-ranging species of Heriades in North America, is of note; this
fact suggests that it occupies a different ecological habitat. Additional biolog-
ical information for this species would be valuable, especially since itis ina
different subgenus than H. carinata.
LITERATURE CITED
Buckell, E.R. 1928. Notes on the life-history and habits of Melittobia chalybii
Ashmead. (Chalcidoidea: Elachertidae). Pan-Pacific Ent. 5: 14-22.
Cooper, K.W. 1953. The ecology, predation, and competition of Ancistrocerus
antilope (Panzer). Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 79: 13-35.
ween . 1957. Biology of Eumenine wasps. V. Digital communication in wasps.
Jour. Exp. Zool. 134: 469-514.
Fabre, J.H. 1914. The mason-bees. Transl. by A. Mattos. Garden City Pub.
Co., New York. 315 pp.
Fischer, R.L. 1955. A nest of Heriades variolosus (Cress.) (Hymenoptera:
Megachilidae). Canad. Ent. 87: 33-36.
Friese, H. 1923. Die europdischen Bienen. De Gruyter & Co., Berlin & Liep-
zig, Germany. 466 pp.
Grandi, G. 1934. Contributi alla conoscenza degli imenotteri melliferi predatori
XIII. Boll. Lab. Entom. Instituto Superiore Agrario de Bologna, 7: 1-144.
Héppner, H. 1904. Zur Biologie der Rubus-Bewohner. I. Gasteruption assectator
Fabr., ein neuer Schmarotzer der Rubus-bewohnenden Prosopis-Arten.
Allegmeine Zeitschrift fur Ent. 9: 97-103.
Hurd, P.D. and C.D. Michener. 1955. The megachiline bees of California.
Calif. Insect-Surv. Bul. 3: 1-247. |
Laboulbene, A. 1873. Note sur la nidification de l'Heriades truncorum et sur
l'Anthrax aethiops, parasite de cet Hymenoptere. Ann. Soc. Entom. de
France, 42: 57-60.
Linsley, E.G. and J.W. MacSwain. 1958. The nesting habits, flower relation-
ships, and parasites of some North American species of Diadasia. Wasmann
Jour. Biol. 15: 199-235.
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 3, 1965
Malyshev, S.I. 1936. The nesting habits of solitary bees. A comparative study.
Eos ll: 201-309.
Matthews, R.W. and R.L. Fischer. 1964. A modified trap-nest for twig-nesting
Aculeata. Proc. N. Central Branch Ent. Soc. Amer. 19: 79-81.
Medler, J.T. 1958. Parasitism of bees in trap-nests by Leucospis affinis Say
(Hymenoptera: Leucospidae). Ent. News 69: 21-24.
Michener, C.D. 1938. American bees of the genus Heriades. Ann. Ent. Soc.
Amer. 31: 514-531.
— oe em . 1953. Comparative morphological and systematic studies of bee
larvae with a key to the families of Hymenopterous larvae. Univ. Kansas
Sci. Bul. 35: 987-1102.
a leataieatatasatan .1955. Some biological observations on Hoplitus pilosifrons and Stelis
lateralis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 28: 81-87.
Mitchell, T.B. 1962. Bees of the Eastern United States. Volume II. Tech. Bull.
N.C. Agric, Exp, Sta, 152... Tio po.
Pate, V.S.L. 1947. Neotropical Sapygidae, with a conspectus of the family
(Hymenoptera:Aculeata). Acta. Zool. Lilloana 4: 393-426.
Rau, P. 1922. Ecological and behavior notes on Missouri insects. Trans. Acad.
Sci. St. Louis 24: 1-71.
Step, E. 1932. Bees, wasps, ants and allied insects of the British Isles.
Frederick Warne & Co., Ltd. London.
Taylor, J.S. 1962. Notes on Heriades freygessneri Schletterer (Hymenoptera:
Megachilidae). Jour. Ent. Soc. S. Africa 25: 133-139.
Figures 1- 8.1, H. carinata breaking through recently completed nest cap
(note resin particles on nest face); 2, nesting habitat at target
range, site 4 at right, site 3 at left background; 3, Oregon
nest of H. carinata, freshly split; 4, same from Michigan in
Saran- covered bore; 5. Operimentum (arrow), larva removed;
6, typical H. carinata cocoons; 7, prepupa of H. carinata
in Saran - covered cell, head at right; 8, pupa of H. carinata.
29
ev eTe ee 2 8 0 ee ei
arere ee ee ee 8 8
eee ero ee 8 2 ee
Pare ee
Oe Se
etaleletatereteteteteteraterereteceretore Pg © Brore Bg breteterete
aletetetateteteteretetereterererererererd @ Gocerp © Poretetes
ateletetetetetetetete cater e! Atammaell «0° Aeflaalf +°0°s°0% 0° hE AneMneling? © © © 010 © 0 0 © 0 OO Pttatsccttere
ete te te etere te ete ee ere ere ce ee eee ees ee ee eo 0 ee 0 0 eof @ @ © @ @ © © O © OC OO Gy 0209.26%0°
CORRRRRRRRE RRR ERE RRR RENN RNS | e ( BB eSSs
IRRRRERRE REM RRR EMRE RMR RR EMI ae ee, ee
Heetgnacacetcectctarccatenecenatetucctocet ovaleceteretetereceretetelorets egg e veces @ O @ Goro’ oo oo oo oo :
vedeledetetededetecereletetetereletererersseressatatsnetecetnsstetsts tee tee ole ee ee oldies
idaccescesatacetstatetece’scotscecocecsretccetscarerateereretstecsrecersiere B® © 7G @.1@ ©. © © Ofsctsittsstirs
iesrecaracatecatonenatecersenen ters tecenocsrotsnesscacstorareceeetchacetersterf @ = @)'@:] 1 © 106/26: c@ =A lectsiscstae sts
Eesepitecenctasctavctscstecetecetacotetetecstesetotete ste Oo 0 O10. OOOO a. 20s 0ie gs
ote ee ee oe eo ec 0 0 0 0 ee ces cee cc ee D @ © @ © 6 6 eC eC
o 8 oe eo 0 0 0-00.00 0.000.000.0000. 00.0 0.0 0 0)
recetereres recesses ees e ce oo ee ene eee e © O10 © Cee ©
vos’ o eso 000 0 0 0 0 eo 0 ee es ete sec e es © © @ © © @ © CO
OHDODDODOOOOOOOOOODOOO OOOO Ese Be] we
ee
Coe ee Re
ero o ee
reer e re
eo 8p ee ee
joer e coe
one ee ee
jee eee
z ay )
JUNE 26
JUNE 27
JUNE 28
JUNE 29
12
TE
JUNE 30
|
4 PM
Begin Cell |
12 NOO
4 PM
|
M
4
PM
| E
Figure: wid,
12 NOON
NOON 1 PM
@ Gf Bs £ Eee
Begin Cell 6
31
9 AM 10 AM
: |
| [et eel
a Cell 2
1PM
=| | fee Be
5 PM 6 PM 7PM
— Cet 2 oe
Begin Cell 3
Begin Cell 4
2 PM 3 PM
Mio: oe oo 5
Begin Cell 5
6 PM 7 PM
M
E
Begin Cap|Base
5 PM
Bid Go [a ao
9 AM
1O AM ILA
| PM 2 PM 3 PM
1 oo BMRB ER PEER E BBO O00) compere
egin Nest} Capping
Five-day arrival and departure records for female H. carinata
Spaces between rectangles indicate
stippled
Open
constructing single 7 - celled nest.
time inside nest. Rectangles indicate time away from nest;
represent pollen foraging trips, solid represent trips for resin.
rectangles indicate female returned with nothing; unshaded ends of
rectangles indicate inaccurate timing. "E" indicates oviposition time.
LOAD 6-7 7
(2 PLACES)
13
aD,
Figures 12 - 17. 12, Placement of successive loads of resin brought prior to
oviposition; 13, position of freshly laid egg of H. carinata on pollen;
14, slumped position of egg immediately prior to hatching; 15, egg of
H. carinata; 16, egg of Sapyga louisi; 17, position and method of
attachment of S, louisi egg on host egg.
33
Figures 18 - 23. 18, Heriades carinata, mature larva; 19, 20, dorsal
and lateral views of head of same; 21, 22, inner and ventral
views of mandibles of same; 23, spiracle of. same,
RRL
Paes"
Bie
Pa oe
Aire
epee
yb
ASI
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
», {R00
yar 2?
Volume 1, Number 4, 1965
268
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
III. Two new Aedes from Tonga and Samoa. By Shivaji
Ramalingam and John N. Belkin.
IV. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of
Salem expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956. By
John N. Belkin.
PUBLICATIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Contribution Series
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number,
with separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a
volume. Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes
are $12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with
its beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total
less than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders or correspondence to the
American Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
Volume I
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumoni-
dae). 75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae).
I, Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America. .
Il. Belkin, John N., etal. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation
of mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 3. In preparation.
No. 4. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae). : |
Il. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and J ohn N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from Tonga and
Samoa.
IV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of Salem
expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956. |
34 pages, 3 figures. : : Price: $1.00, postpaid
Memoir Series
The Memoirs are for book-length monographs on insects. They are issued as cloth-bound
volumes, at irregular intervals as suitable manuscripts are available. Numbers are sold
separately, or in subscriptions to the series. Subscribers receive a 10% discount from the regu-
lar price. Address orders or correspondence to the American Entomological Institute, 5950
Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
No. 1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1961. A catalogue
and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. 522 pages.
Price: $14.50, postpaid
No. 2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1962. Ichneumonidae of America north
of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. 305 pages, 162 maps,
116 figures. : Price: $9.50, postpaid
No. 3. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of ree 5. Sub-
family Diplazontinae. 304 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
Price: $9. 50, postpaid
No: 4.' Matsuda, Ryuichi, 1965. ' Morphology and evolution of the insect head. 334 pages,
111 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
Ill. TWO NEW SPECIES OF AEDES FROM TONGA AND SAMOA?
By Shivaji Aainalinean and John N. Belkin’
The two new species described here were discovered in connection with stud-
ies on the mosquito fauna of Samoa and Tonga and its relation to subperiodic
Bancroitian filariasis. Keys, collection data and more detailed discussions of
the systematics, bionomics and disease relations will be presented in a forth-
coming publication by Ramalingam on these investigations. We are very grate-
ful to Peter F. Mattingly for the loan of some material from Tonga and for re-
examining the type of Aedes tongae. We also wish to acknowledge the assis-
tance of Rainer Beck and Anne Acevedo in the preparation of the final figures
for publication.
The terminology of Belkin (1962, Mosq. So. Pacific) is used throughout the
descriptions except for hair branching in the immature stages. For the latter,
if only one numeral is given in parentheses following the hair number it repre-
sents the only number of branches encountered in the sample; if 2 sets of fig-
ures are given, the first represents the mean number of branches rounded to
the nearest whole number and the second, the range encountered in the sample.
The chaetotaxy of the immature stages was determined from a sample of 10 in-
dividuals.
1. Aedes (Stegomyia) tabu, new species
(Figure 1)
Aedes (Stegomyia) tongae in part of Edwards 1926, B. Ent. Res. 17: 103; Bel-
kin 1962, Mosq. So. Pacific 475-476, figs. 349, 350; Ramalingam and Bel-
kin 1964, Nature 201: 105-106.
In general as described and figured by Belkin (1962, loc. cit.) for ''tongae, "'
with the following distinctive features and restrictions.
: This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service training
grant TI-AI-132, directed by Dr. John F. Kessel; and in part by National Sci-
ence Foundation Research Grants G-18961 and GB-2270.
‘ Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles; present
address, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ma-
laya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaya.
. Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
90024.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
Female: Abdominal tergite VII with lateral silvery markings usually con-
nected by a complete or dotted transverse dorsal silvery band; one or more
additional tergites with a complete or dotted transverse dorsal silvery band.
Male Genitalia (fig. 1b): Apical hairs of claspette extending basad to about
0.34 of length of entire claspette; specialized setae relatively long, average
length 0.053 mm.
Pupa (fig. la): The following additions and corrections should be made to
Belkin's description and figure which were based on a single damaged specimen.
Cephalothorax: Hair 1 (1, 1-2), 2 (2), 3 (1), 4 (2, 1-2), 5 (2, 1-2), 6 (1), 7
(2, 1-2), 8 (3, 2-4), 9 (1), 10 (3, 2-4), 11 (1), 12 (1, 1-2).
Abdomen: Dorsum of segments I-III darkened, other segments gradually pa-
ler distad. Hair 0 and 14 single on all segments. Segment I: hair 1 (dendritic),
2 (1), 3 (1), 4. (8, 2-3), 5 (2, 1-2), 6 (1), 7 @, 1-2), 9 (1). Segment II: hair 1
(5, 4-7), 2 (1), 3 (1), 4 (2, 1-3), 5 (2, 1-3), 6 (1), 7 (2), 9 (1). Segment III:
hair 1 (2, 1-4), 2 (1), 3 (1, 1-2), 4 (2, 1-3), 5 (2, 1-3), 6 (1), 7 (2, 1-2), 8 @,
1-3), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (1).. Segment IV: hair 1 (1, 1-2), 2 (1), 3 @, 1-3), 4 (1,
1-2), 5 (1, 1-2), 6 (1), 7? G, 1-2), 8 (2, 1-3); 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 @). Segment V;
hair 1 (1), 2 (1), 3 (1), 4 (2, 1-2), 5) (1, 1-2), 6 (1): T (1, 1-3), 8 (2, 143), 9
(1), 10 (1), 11 (1).. Segment VI: hair 1 (1), 2: (1), 3.1), 4 (2, 2-3), 5 (1); 6),
7(1, 1-2), 8 (2, 1-2), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (1). Segment VII: hair 1 (1), 2 (1), 3 (1),
4 (1), 5 (1), 6 (1), 7 (1), 8 (1, 1-2), 9 (1, -1-2), 10 (1), 11 (1). Segment VII:
hair 4 (1), 9 (with 2 primary and several secondary branches). Paddle as fig-
ured; apex slightly produced; marginal spicules long, filamentous and hairlike;
pigmentation light yellowish brown, with darker midrib.
Larva: Both hairy and nonhairy larvae are known.
Type: o (234-25) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide,
Eua Island, Tonga, from leaf axil of taro (Colocasia), 17 June 1963, S. Rama-
lingam (USNM). |
Paratypes: All from Eua Island, Tonga, collected by S. Ramalingam. 1c
(223-102) with associated pupal skin, from leaf axil of taro (Colocasia), 14 June
1963 (BMNH). 12 (228-101), 10° (228-102) with associated pupal skins, from
leaf axil of giant taro (Alocasia), 15 June 1963 (UCLA). I1o° (234-101) with as-
sociated pupal skin (Ramalingam), 2 whole larvae (UCLA, Ramalingam), same
data as holotype. 19 (235-26) with associated larval and pupal skins (USNM,
allotype), 10° (235-109) with associated pupal skin (UCLA), 1c” (235-3) (QUEEN),
4 whole larvae (235) (BMNH, USNM, UCLA, QUEEN), from cavity in fern
stump in partial shade, 17 June 1963.
Specimens: 955; 3209, 1650°; 130 pupae; 340 larvae; 13 individual rearings
(6 larval, 7 pupal). |
Systematics: The presence of 2 distinct species of the scutellaris group of
Aedes (Stegomyia) in the Tonga Islands has been established through individual
rearings from larvae and pupae made by Ramalingam. Both species have been
reported in the past as Aedes (S.) tongae Edwards, 1926 by numerous investi-
gators. |
One of the species is tongae itself and is known at present only from the
Haapai and Vavau groups. It is very similar to cooki Belkin, 1962 from Niue
Island based upon reexamination of the claspette of the type of tongae from
Haapai by Mattingly (in litt.) and a comparison with limited topotypic material
of cooki. A decision as to the taxonomic status of cooki, however, must be
postponed until more material of all stages is available for detailed study.
The second species from Tonga, described and figured in considerable de-
tail as "tongae'' by Belkin (1962, loc. cit.), is the only species of the group
§
‘E
Ramalingam & Belkin: New Aedes 3
known at present from Tongatabu group but occurs also in the Haapai group. It
is further described here and given the name, Aedes (S.) tabu. This is the spe-
cies which has been most commonly collected in Tonga since it occurs on the
principal island of Tongatabu.
The separation of the two species is relatively clear-cut in all known stipes.
In the females, true tongae differs from tabu (as diagnosed above) in the absence
of a complete or dotted transverse dorsal silvery band connecting the lateral
silvery markings on abdominal tergite VII; it also has less distinct transverse
dorsal bands on the more proximal abdominal tergites. In the male genitalia,
tongae (fig. 1c) is differentiated from tabu (fig. 1b and as diagnosed above) by
the relatively shorter apical hairs of the claspette extending basad only about
0.25 of the length of the entire claspette and by relatively shorter specialized
setae (average length 0.046 mm). In the pupal stage, tongae has cephalothorac-
ic hair 10-C usually double instead of with 3 or more branches and abdominal
hairs 5-II,IV usually double instead of single. In the larval stage, tongae dif-
fers from tabu most conspicuously in hair 4a-X of the anal segment being double
or triple instead of single.
Bionomics and Disease Relations: The immature stages of tabu have been
collected in the leaf axils of taro (Colocasia) and giant taro (Alocasia), in tree-
holes and tree fern stumps, in coconut shells and spathes on the ground and in
artificial containers. A. tabu appears to be a semidomestic form and bites
primarily during the day in the bush surrounding villages. This species (as —
tongae) has been reported to be naturally and experimentally infected with Wu-
chereria bancrofti on the island of Tongatabu (Ramalingam and Belkin 1964, ©
op. cit.).
Distribution: TONGA: Tongatabu Group, Tongatabu, Eua; Haapai Group, To-
fua, Matuku. Not known elsewhere.
2. Aedes (Finlaya) tutuilae, new species
(Figures 2 and 3)
Female: Wing: 2.71 mm. Proboscis: 1.58 mm. Forefemur: 1.64 mm. Ab-
domen: about 2.46 mm. With the general characters of the kochi group as de-
scribed by Belkin (1962, Mosq. So. Pacific 357-359); coloration intermediate
between oceanicus Belkin, 1962 and samoanus (Grinberg, 1913).
Head: Light scaling of head capsule dingy white, beige, or with yellowish
tinge; dark scaling dark brown, extensive; median longitudinal light stripe of
vertex broad, with narrow whitish or beige scales anteriorly and broader
scales posteriorly; erect scales dark brown. Clypeus dark brown. Median light
ring of labium broad with pure white to dingy white scales in the center and
yellowish scales toward the ends; a wide patch or incomplete ring of white or
beige scales on apex of labium. Palpus about 0.2-0.3 of proboscis length, with
dark brown scales except for a few whitish ones on apex. Torus beige to light
brown, with pale flat scales on mesal surface; flagellar segments brown, inter-
segmental areas paler.
Thorax: Integument brown to dark brown. Mesonotum with indefinite pat-
tern of white and golden scales not contrasting with bronzy dark scales; pre-
scutellar area with caudal patch of light scales; scutellar scales white to beige,
midlobe with apical patch of dark scales, occasionally 1-2 dark scales on lat-
eral lobes. Paratergite with white scales; apn and ppn with whitish to beige
scales, ppn with a few dark scales above; remainder of pleural scales white;
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
psp sometimes with a few scales; pra with scales above and below bristles.
Legs: Light scaling of femur and tibia of foreleg and midleg usually strongly
yellowish, of hindleg usually largely white. Subapical tufts of all femora mod-
erately developed, largely dark. Light scaling of tarsi largely white, some
yellowish scales on segment 1 of foretarsus. Foretarsus and midtarsus with
rather wide basal, variable median and wide apical light bands and ventral sur-
face completely light on segments 1 and 2; apical light band broadest on seg-
ment 1; segment 2 with basal and apical light bands subequal; segment 3 usually
with a few white scales apically; segment 4 completely dark; segment 5 com-
pletely light. Hindtarsal segment 1 with subequal basal and apical broad light
rings and a smaller median light ring, dark scaling forming complete rings;
segments 2 and 3 with apical light ring about 0.35-0. 45 of segment length; seg-
ment 4 all dark; segment 5 all light.
Wing: Predominantly light; light scaling dingy white caudally and light yel-
lowish anteriorly on dorsal surface. Prehumeral light spot always present; hu-
meral light spot very large, sometimes fused with prehumeral; base of vein C
largely light. Accessory subcostal pale area always very strongly developed
on both veins C and R}.
Haltere: Knob dark-scaled.
Abdomen: Integument brown. Dorsum of tergites I-VI mostly dark-scaled,
with light scales in discrete patches; dorsum of tergites VII, VIII with large
patch of buff and yellowish scales; sternites entirely yellowish-scaled except
for small apical dark scale tufts on VI, VII.
Male: Wing: 2.31 mm. Proboscis: 1.68 mm. Forefemur: 1.52 mm. Gen-
erally similar to female in coloration. Head: median light stripe of vertex
wide, with broad scales predominating. Labium: with very narrow complete
median light ring; apical light patch reduced and inconspicuous. Palpus: ex-
ceeding proboscis by less than length of segment 5; pale scaling white to yel-
lowish; segment 2 with wide subbasal and apical light bands; segment 3 with
two small submedian light patches; segment 4 white in basal half; segment 5
largely light except for a narrow submedian dark ring; remainder of palpus
with dark scales. Abdomen: dorsum with pale scaling more extensive than in
female.
Male Genitalia (fig. 2 ): As figured; lateral scales of sidepiece all dark;
inner sternal scales and basal tergomesal hairs pale yellowish to light brown.
Segment IX: Tergite lobe relatively prominent, with 1-3 hairs.
Sidepiece: Moderately long and broad. Basal tergomesal patch of hairs
sparse, extending nearly to postmedian central mesal patch; basal hairs less
curved than distal, latter with lanceolate apex. Specialized basal mesal seta
very prominent; its distal part bent, flattened and tapering to a point. A row
of 4-5 setae with flattened, expanded translucent apex, extending from the spe-
cialized basal mesal seta toward the postmedian central mesal patch of hairs
and joining the distal end of the basal tergomesal patch of hairs; the most prox-
imal seta with large circular apex, the distal with progressively smaller and
more lanceolate tips. Specialized median mesal patch very distinct, setae
shorter than in adjoining patches. Postmedian central mesal patch dense; in-
dividual hairs pointed and curved at apex. Inner sternal scales usually 11-13,
all striated, the distal narrower and longer.
Claspette: Nearly as long as sidepiece; appendage predunculate, expanded
portion broad, bladelike and with obtuse basal angle.
Clasper: Moderately long, usually distinctly widened in the middle; 1-2 mi-
nute subapical hairs. Spiniform relatively short, slightly curved at distal third.
Ramalingam & Belkin: New Aedes 5
Phallosome: Aedeagus mushroom-shaped and truncate apically.
Proctiger: 1-2 pairs of cercal setae.
Pupa (fig. 2): Abdomen: 3.29 mm. Trumpet: 0.4 mm. Paddle: 0.69 mm.
Chaetotaxy as figured; hairs lightly to very lightly pigmented. In life a very
conspicuous dorsal pattern of moderate to strong pigmentation embracing the
trumpets, mesonotum, metanotum and abdominal tergites I-IV contrasting very
sharply with the rest of the body which is a uniform light lemon yellow color;
the dark pigmentation with numerous clear unpigmented spots and light blotches
as described and figured.
Cephalothorax: Mesonotum moderately pigmented between trumpets, with
many clear unpigmented areas caudad and at base of wing case. Metanotum with
darkly pigmented caudolateral area broken by a clear unpigmented lateral spot;
middle and anterior part with many clear unpigmented areas and small blotches
and spots of dark pigmentation. Trumpet very darkly and uniformly pigmented
and contrasting very sharply with rest of cephalothorax. Hair: 1 (2), 2 (2), 3
(2, 2-3), 4 (6, sails 5) (4, 3-5), 6 (3, 2-3), 7 (4, 3-5), 8 (2), 9 (2, 2-3), 10 (4,
3-5), 11 (1); 12 (6,.6-7%).
Abdomen: Tergite I uniformly darkly pigmented except for usual membra-
nous areas and a pair of submedian clear unpigmented spots cephalomesad of
hair 1. Tergite II darkly pigmented along caudal border and on a pair of large
triangular sublateral areas connected by broad base to caudal border; area be-
tween dark triangles moderately to lightly pigmented and blotched with darker
pigmentation and dark spots at base of larger hairs. Tergites II,IV moderately
pigmented on broad median trapezoidal areas widened caudad; central area of
trapezoids blotched with lighter pigmentation and clear unpigmented spots, par-
ticularly cephalad on II and caudad on HI. Sternites II-IV moderately and rather
uniformly pigmented in the middle, progressively less widely and strongly
caudad. Segment I: hair 1 (16-19 primary branches, subequal in length to ter-
gite, each with several secondary branches), 2 (2, 1-4), 3 (1), 4 (7, 5-8), 5 (4,
3-5), 6 (2, 1-2), 7 (3, 2-4), 9 (1, 1-2), 10 (1), 11 (2, 1-4). Segment II: hair 0
(1), 1 (2, 1-4), 2 (1), 3 (1), 4 (4, 3-6), 5) (2, 1-3), 6 (2, 1-2), 7 (4, 3-4), 8 (2,
1-3), 9 (1), 10 (1, 1-2), 11 (1). Segment III: hair 0 (1), 1 (2; 1-3), 2 (1, 1-2),
3 bt), 2 (4, 3-5), 5) (3, 2-4), 6 (2, 1-2), 7 (3), 8 (3), 9 (1), 10 (2, 1-3), 11 (1),
14 (1). Segment IV: hair 0 (1), 1 (2, 2-3), 2 (1), 3-(4, 3-5), 4 (2, 1-4), 5 (2);
6 (2, 1-3), 7 (8, 2-3), 8 (3), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (4), 14 (1). Segment V: hair 0
(1), 1 (2, 1-3), 2 (1), 3 (2, Loa, 4 (4, 3-5), 5) (2), 6 (2, 1-3), 7 (4, 3-5), 8 (3,
2-4), 9 (1), 10 (1, 1-2), 11 (1), 14 (1). Segment VI: hair 0 (1), 1 (2, 1-2), 2 (1),
3 (2, 1-2), 4 (3, 2-4), 5 (2), 6 (2, 1-4), 7 (8, 2-4), 8 (8, 2-4), 9 (1, 1-2), 10
(3, 2-5), 11 (1), 14 (1). Segment VI: hair 0 (1), 1 (2, 1-3), 2 (1), 3 (2, 1-2),
4 (2, 1-2), 5) (3, 2-5), 6 (4, 3-5), 7 di, 1-3}, 8 (1, 1-4), 9 (3, 2-4), 10 (3, 3-4),
11 (1, 1-2), 14 (1). Segment VIII: hair 0 (1), 4 (2, 1-2), 9 (12, 11-15), 14 (1).
Paddle: Uniformly lightly pigmented, midrib darker; apex distinctly emar-
ginate; external margin with short dorsal spicules; hair 1 slender. Male geni-
tal lobe extending to about 0.56 of paddle, female genital lobe to 0.31.
Larva (fig. 3): Head: 0.68 mm. Siphon: 0.72 mm. Anal saddle: 0.2 mm.
Chaetotaxy as figured, hairs lightly to moderately pigmented. In life the lar-
vae are light lemon yellow in color and appear moderately hairy.
Head: Width about 1.12 of length. Ocular bulge prominent; collar well de-
veloped. Pigmentation light except in area around mouth where it is slightly
darkened; integument smooth. Mental plate with a strong median tooth and 9
(8-10) distinct teeth on each side, often a smaller detached tooth at base. Hair
1 (3), 4 (8, 7-11; not in line with 7, 6-C; all branches in one plane), 5 (1;slender),
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
6 (5, 4-6; branches in one plane), 7 (14, 9-18; stellate), 8 (2, 2-3), 9 (3, 3-4),
10 (1, 1-2), 11 (11, 8-13; stellate), 12 (2, 2-3), 13 (1), 14 (11, 9-13; stellate),
15 (4, 4-5; minute, inconspicuous).
Antoine: Length about 0.25 of head. Shaft waddailc narrowing from base;
width at middle about 0.2 of length; uniformly lightly pigmented, without spicules.
All hairs single; hair 1 at 0.6 from base.
Thorax: Apices of long hairs attentuate; barbs present on some hairs. Pro-
thorax: hair 0 (19, 17-21), 1 (20, 19-22), 2 (1, 1-2), 3 (16, 13-18), 4 (2, 1-2),
5 (13, 10-15), 6.1), 7 (8, 2-3), 8 (13, 12-16), 9 (17, 15-20). 10 (6,°5-8), FI
(2), 12 (1), 14 (2). Mesothorax: hair 1 (23, 16-25), 2 (3, 2-3), 3 (1), 4 (2, 2-
Sy, 39 1), 6 (9, S-11), 7 (1), 8 (7, 6-9), 9 (11, 9-14), 10 (1), 11 (10, 8-12); 12
(1), 13 (13, 11-16), 14 (9, 6-11). Metathorax: hair 1 (22, 15-28), 2 (1), 3 (16,
13-18), 4 (4, 4-5), 5 (15, 13-19), 6 (1), 7 (12, 8-16), 8 (12, 10-15), 9 (11, 9-
14) 10 (i). IT (1, 10-12), 12 G1). 13 (80, 21-33):
Abdomen: Stellate hairs with branches of equal length; hair 14 single on all
segments. Segment I: hair 1 (25, 21-29), 2 (22, 18-27), 3 (1), 4 (14, 11-17),5
(14, 11-17), 6 (8, 6-9), 7 (2), 9 (8, 7-10), 10 (2, 2-3), 11 (21, 19-24), 12 (1),
13 (21, 17-26). Segment II: hair 0 (1), 1 (25, 20-28), 2 (21, 18-23), 3 (1), a
2-5), 5 (15, 13-17), 6 (7, 5-9), 7, 2-4), 8 (1), 9 (9, T- 11), 10 (7, 6-8),
(3, 2-3), 12 (1), 13 (18, 13- 23). Segment III: hair 0 (1), 1 (24, 19-27), 2 is
17-22), 3°), 4 (2,°2-3), 5 (15, 18-18),.6 (, 2-3), 7 (13, 10-16), 8 (1), 9 (10,
8-12), 10 (1), 11 @, 2-3), 12°), 13 19, 16-25). Segment IV: hair 0 (1), 1 (24,
20-27), 2 (20, 17-23), 3 (1), 4 (1, 1-2), 5 (16, 13-21), 6 (8, 2-3), 7 (14, 12-17),
8 (1), 9 (12, 10-14), 10 (1), 11 (3), 12 (1), 13 (19, 14-23). Segment V: hair 0
(iy 1°28, 20-20), 2 (20, 17-23), 3 1), 42, 2-3), 5 (7) 13-21): 6 (2, 2-3), 7
(16, 14-18), 8 (1), 9 (13, 10-16), 10 @), 11 @, 2-4), 12 (1), 13: @0, 17-27).
Segment VI: hair 0 (1), 1 (22, 18-25), 2 (20, 17-25), 3 (1), 4 (2, 1-2), 5 (16,.
13-19), 6 (3, 2-3), 7 (16, 14-18), 8 (2, 1-3), 9 (12, 10-13), 10 (8, 2-3), 11 (15,
13-18), 12 (1), 13 (21, 17-24). Segment VII: hair 0 (1), 1 (17, 15-19), 2 (18,
17-22), 3 (1), 4G), 5 (16, 13-19), 6 (13, 10-15), 7 1), 8 (16, 1i- 19), 9 (12, 9-
14), 10'(17, 14-23), 11 (2, 2-3), 12 (1), 13: (19, 17-21).
Segment VIII: Comb scales numerous and arranged in 4-5 rows, poorly pig-
mented and difficult to see; those in posterior row with base of free part elon-
gate, with 1-2 pairs of sharp denticles, distal part flattened and expanded, apex
with sharp point. Hair 0 (1), 1 (19, 16-23), 2 (1), 3 (3, 2-4), 4 (1), 5 (18, 16-
21), 14 (1). | | :
Siphon: Index about 3.25-3.85. Very lightly pigmented; spicules short but
numerous and uniformly distributed except on ventral surface between the pec-
ten teeth of the 2 sides. Pecten extending to 0.45; teeth 8 (7-10) in number, as
figured. Hair 1 (4, 3-5; barbed), 2 (1), 3-5, 7 not visible, 6 (1), 8 (1), 9 (1).
Anal Segment: Saddle lightly pigmented; uniformly covered with short spi-
cules except on caudolateral border where spicules are of varying sizes and
much longer. Gills as figured, ventral pair about 0.68 length of dorsal. Hair
1 (4, 3-4), 2 (5, 4-5), 3 (1), 4a (4, 4-5), 4b (5, 4- 5), 4c (6, 5-7), 4d (6, 5-7),
4e (7, 6- 7).
Type: & (270-10) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide,
Aoloau, Tutuila, American Samoa, elev. 1500 ft, from leaf axil of a smooth-
leafed Pandanus, 22 July 1963, J. N. Belkin, S. Ramalingam and N. Bpeneer
(USNM).
Paratypes: 99, 110, 1 pupal skin, 18 whole pupae, 159 whole larvae, all
from same collection (270) as holotype. 12 (270-13) with associated larval and
pupal skins (allotype), 1 whole larva (USNM). 12 (270-15) with associated
Ramalingam & Belkin: New Aedes fi
larval and pupal skins, 10° (270-101) with associated pupal skin, 1 whole larva
(BMNH). 19 (270-109) and 1c (270-18) with associated pupal skins, 1 whole lar-
va (QUEEN). 19 (270-18) with associated larval and pupal skins, 1c (270-100)
with associated pupal skin, 1 whole larva (Ramalingam). 39 (270-12, 17, 31)
and 1o’ (270-11) with associated larval and pupal skins, 5c“ (270-102, 103, 104,
105, 106), 12 (270-107) with associated pupal skins, 1c (270-16) without asso-
ciated skins, 2 sets of associated larval and pupal skins (270-14, 19) without ¢,
12 (270-30) with associated larval skin, 29, 1c (270), 1 pupal skin (270), 10
whole pupae and 155 whole larvae (UCLA).
Specimens: 501; 689; 620°; 27 pupae; 344 larvae; 64 individual rearings (42
larval, 22 pupal).
Systematics: This species is the third member of the kochi group to be de-
scribed from Samoa. It can be distinguished readily from the other 2 species
in all stages except in the female which is extremely similar to samoanus.
In the female, tutuilae and samoanus are separated from oceanicus by the
predominantly light-scaled base of vein C. The entire wing is also predomi-
nantly light-scaled in these 2 species while it is largely dark-scaled in oceani-
cus. The separation of tutuilae from samoanus is not at all reliable at present.
In tutuilae the abdominal tergites are always largely dark-scaled, the light
scales being restricted usually to small discrete patches. In samoanus there
is a tendency towards an increase in the amount of light-scaling on the abdomi-
nal tergites (especially in Western Samoa, where the tergites may be completely
light-scaled) but there is a great deal of overlap with tutuilae (especially in
American Samoa). In the wing, tutuilae generally has a well developed acces-
sory subcostal pale area on vein C while in samoanus this pale area is generally
smaller and frequently does not extend to vein C; however, there is considerable
overlap and this character cannot be trusted.
In the male genitalia, tutuilae is immediately differentiated from both sa-
moanus and oceanicus by the presence of a row of specialized setae with ex-
panded apex between the specialized basal mesal seta and the proximal end of
the postmedian central mesal patch of bristles; this row of setae is not differen-
tiated in the other species.
In the pupa, tutuilae has a striking cephalothoracic and abdominal color pat-
tern quite different from any other species of the group. Particularly notice-
able are the extremely dark trumpets.
In the larva, tutuilae and samoanus are differentiated from oceanicus by the
distinctly spiculose siphon and the flattened, heavily branched head hairs 4, 6-C.
A. tutuilae can be separated from samoanus by the smaller number of branches
in head hair 4-C (7-11 instead of 14-22), head hair 6-C (4-6 instead of 9-12)
and by the shorter simple spicules of the siphon (longer, denser and branched
in samoanus).
Bionomics and Disease Relations: The immature stages of tutuilae have been
collected primarily in the leaf axils of Pandanus from sea level to elevations of
1500 ft. No definite information is available at present regarding the bionomics
of the adults of tutuilae. It is possible that the report (Ramalingam and Belkin
1964, loc. cit.) of 2 specimens infected with Wuchereria bancrofti refers to
this species (as Aedes (Finlaya) South Pacific sp. no. 25, UCLA collection) but
it is also possible that the specimens in question are true samoanus since the
2 species cannot be differentiated with certainty in the female.
Distribution: SAMOA: Savaii; Upolu; Tutuila, Ofu (Manua group). Not
known elsewhere.
AEDES (STEGOMYIA)
sy aN
TD iN
St La >.
Pa LG
tabu
sti ue
AG pr
SN)
wr
(SR 269)
Tutuila
tutuilae
(SR 270-10)
AEDES (FINLAYA)
SSS Ne
SV
SSS
a SS
~
(SR 269)
Tutuila
tutuilae
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
IV. THE MOSQUITOES OF THE ROBINSON- PEABODY MUSEUM
OF SALEM EXPEDITION TO THE SOUTHWEST PACIFIC, 19564
By John N. Belkin’
INTRODUCTION
A very interesting and valuable collection of mosquitoes, primarily from
Polynesian outliers, was obtained by David D. Bonnet on the Robinson- Peabody
Museum of Salem Expedition to the Southwest Pacific, 1956 (Robinson 1965, in
press). The opportunity to examine the collection was particularly welcome
owing to the fact that this material filled some of the most glaring lacunae in
our knowledge of the mosquitoes of the South Pacific at the time that I was en-
gaged in studying the fauna of this area. I had the opportunity to participate in
the planning for the entomological phases of the expedition and suggested lo-
calities and mosquito groups that needed particular attention. I wish to thank
William A. Robinson, the leader of the expedition, for making the material
available to me and for visiting some isolated islands that were not originally
on the itinerary thus making it possible to collect material that has been of in-
estimable value to me in the preparation of a survey and analysis of the mos-
quitoes of the South Pacific.
Although the mosquito material collected on the expedition is not very ex-
tensive (about 50 species; 2789 specimens including 2320, 36292, 1704 larvae
and 491 pupae), it is of great interest and significance. Much of it consists of
rearings and includes many individual rearings from larvae or pupae, thus es-
tablishing for the first time a correlation of sexes and stages for several spe-
cies. It includes 3 new species not known by any other material (Aedes (S.)
robinsoni, Aedes (S.) futunae and Tripteroides (T.) bonneti), 2 new but un-
named forms not represented by any other material (Culex (Lophoceraomyia)
sp. 13, Aoba form and Aedes (S.) sp. near gurneyi), critical material of 4 ad-
ditional new species represented by specimens from other collections (Aedes
(F.) oceanicus, Aedes (S.) aobae, Aedes (S.) rotumae and Aedes (S.) varuae),
This investigation was supported in part by National Science Foundation
Research Grants G-3382, G-18961 and GB-2270.
‘neoartcel of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
90024.
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
additional material and stages of 2 species previously known only by the type
collections (Aedes (S.) tulagiensis and Tripteroides (T.) distigma), additional
larval material of 2 unnamed new forms (Culex (Lophoceraomyia) sp. 15, San-
ta Cruz forms and Culex (L.) sp. 18, Solomons rock pool forms), and finally
numerous new records of species from islands never previously collected or
very poorly sampled, notably from Alofi in the Hoorn group, Rotuma Island,
Aoba and Vao in the New Hebrides, the Santa Cruz and Reef islands, Sikiana,
Nuguria, Tabar, Wuvulu and Tobi.
The present report covers only the collections made in the Australasian
part of the area covered by the expedition, i.e. from Samoa westward to Tobi
Island. Unless indicated to the contrary I have personally identified all this
material. Iam grateful to Elizabeth N. Marks of the University of Queensland
for checking the identification of most of the material from Nuguria westward
to Wuvulu and to Richard M. Bohart of the University of California, Davis for
the identification of species from Tobi Island. The material from the Sulu Ar-
chipelago and North Borneo awaits detailed study by Peter F. Mattingly of the
British Museum (Nat. Hist.) and his collaborators engaged in a study of the
mosquitoes of the Indomalayan area.
The taxonomic treatment follows that of my ''Mosquitoes of the South Pa-
cific'' (Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1962) where the new species
were described. An asterisk (*) preceding a locality or species indicates a
new record. The localities are given in an east to west and south to north se-
quence throughout. The numbers in parentheses following localities or spec-
ies refer to the Bonnet collection numbers, the data on which are given in the
section on Collection Data and Identifications. All the material has been de-
posited either in the U.S. National Museum (USNM) or the University of Cali-
fornia, Los Angeles (UCLA).
COLLECTION DATA AND IDENTIFICATIONS
The collection data have been transcribed directly from the field notes of
David D. Bonnet. All the collections were made in 1956 on the dates specified
for each.
1. Fagaitua, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 21. Leaf axil of taro (talo
manua), in partial shade. Aedes (F.) oceanicus, 1L.
2. Utumea, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 21. Leaf axil of pandanus, in
shade. Aedes (F.) oceanicus, 1c, 19, 2P, 7L.
3. Auasi, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 21. Leaf axil of taro (ta'amu),
in partial shade. Aedes (F.) oceanicus, 3P, 4L.
4. Amouli, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 23. Leaf axil of bico (ta'amu),
Aedes (F. ) oceadicus. 40;
9. Amouli, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 23. Leaf axil of pandanus
(laufala). Aédes (F.) oceanicus, 7L.
6. Amouli, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 24. Tin can in bush area be-
hind village, shaded. Aedes (S.) polynesiensis, 2L.
7. Amouli, Tutuila, American Samoa. July 24. Leaf axil of pandanus
(laufala). Medes (F. ) oceanicus, 2P, QOL:
8. Mu'a, Alofi, Hoorn Islands. July 29. Biting man in bush in daytime.
Aedes (S.) futunae, 39.
9. Mu'a, Alofi, Hoorn Islands. July 29. Biting man in bush in daytime.
Aedes (S. ) futunae, 49; A. (S.) polynesiensis, 19.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 13
10. Mu'a, Alofi, HoornIslands. July 29. Treehole at base of large tree
(Inocarpus?), in deep shade in dense forest. Aedes (S.) futunae, 50%, 59, 9P,
35L; A. (S.) polynesiensis, 30°; A. (Finlaya) oceanicus, 1L.
10R. Oinafa Village, Rotuma. Aug. 3-5. No other data, presumably
biting. Aedes (Aedim.) nocturnus, 29; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 119.
11. Mu'a, Alofi, HoornIslands. July 29. Coconut half in bush area along
trail. Aedes (S.) polynesiensis, 10’, 29, 1L, 2P.
12. Oinafa, Rotuma. -Aug. 4. Hole in large "hefau'’ tree, in partial shade.
Aedes (S.) rotumae, 1c, 8L, 1P.
13. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Step cut in coconut palm, in shade. Aedes
(S.) rotumae, 21.
14. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 3-4. Biting man at night in Chief Tokaninua's
house. Aedes (s. ) rotumae, 19; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 209.
15. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Partially burned coconut half, in shaded
brush area close to village. Aedes (S.) rotumae, 20°, 42, 43L, 20P.
16. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Well, 8 ft. deep, 6 ft. diameter. No mos-
quitoes. Water beetles.
17. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Hole in ''shebe” tree, 3 ft. from ground;
opposite graveyard. Aedes (S.) rotumae, 40°, 29, 20L, 5P.
18. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Tin can in deep shade in bush area, edge of
village. Aedes (S.) rotumae, 15L; Tripteroides (R.) rotumanus, 5L.
19. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. ‘Swamp 300 yards inland from village toward
gardens; water very warm to touch; full sun. Aedes (Aedim.) nocturnus, 20L.
20. Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 4. Net sweepings in bush area back of village,
opposite eMist's house; 1750 hrs. Aedes (S.) rotumae, 10%, 39; Aedes (Aedim. )
nocturnus, 19.
al, Oinafa, Rotuma. Aug. 5. Mixed collection from treehole, coconut
halves and tin cans in bush area behind village. Aedes (S.) rotumae, 20, 49,
eel. Gr.
22. Matauta, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Biting man in daytime, in partial shade
along trail to Lake Terota; adjacent to collection 31. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 39.
23. Matauta, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Treehole, in shade along trail toward
Lake Terota. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 19.
24. Matauta, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Treehole, in partial shade along trail to-
ward Ravanga village and Lake Terota. No mosquitoes.
25. Teifi, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Coconut shell, in shaded bush near trail to
Lake Terota. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 4c, 12, 18L, 4P.
26. Teifi, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Treehole in papaya tree, in full sun along
trail to Ravanga village, near gardens. Aedes (.) hebrideus, go. 12, 4,22.
27. Terota, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Edge of Lake Terota, in bull rushes and
water lilies. Anopheles (C.) farauti, 19, 4L; Culex (C. ) annulirostris, ic’, 38;
10L, 2P; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis (R.) melanesiensis, 1P (probably erroneous record).
28. Terota, erota, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Small ground pools and footprints in taro
patch near Lake Terota; very soft mud. No mosquitoes.
29. Kafika, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Outrigger canoe on beach of village, in par-
tial shade. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 25L.
30. Teifi, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Biting manin daytime, in partial shade on
trail to Matauta. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 29.
31. Teifi, Tikopia. Aug. 8. Treehole, in shade along trail toward Matau-
ta. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 20°, 39, 8L, 5P; Tripteroides melanesiensis, 4c’,
59, 41L, 4P.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
831A. Tikopia? No locality, date or habitat given. Aedes (S.) hebrideus,
1co,: 69,.4P:
32. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Water inironframe of old
steam boiler, partial shade. Culex (Lopho.) sp. 15, Santa Cruz forms, 15L.
33. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Iron drum, 55 gal. rain bar-
rel in open sun. Aedes (S.) varuae, 15L; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 1L.
34. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Iron drum, 55 gal. rain bar-
rel, open sun. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus, 30", 42, 8L, 7P.
35. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Kerosene tin, 5 gal., filled
with rain water from corrugated iron roof. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus, 1c,
fy, 10, 2iP,
36. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Rain barrel, 55 gal. drum,
shaded. Aedes (V.) lineatus, 10°, 42, 11L, 4P.
37. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Taken while biting man in
daytime in partial shade on pathway to Government House. Aedes (V.) linea-
tus, 19.
38. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Tree fern stump with water
in center on pathway toward Government House, full sun. Aedes (S.) robin-
soni, 10’, 1P; Aedes (S.) varuae, 1L; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 30, 19,
50L, 2P.
39. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Treefern stump with water
in center on hillside above Government House, partial shade. No mosquitoes.
40. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Large treehole in Flame tree
(Poinciana) near Government House on hillside, partial shade. Aedes (S.)
robinsoni, 30°, 9L, 7P; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 8c", 492, 39L, 12P.
41. Peuo, Vanikoro, Santa Cruz. Aug. 11. Tractor ruts in swampy area
of timber trail below Government House toward river, full sunlight, water very ©
warm to touch. Anopheles farauti, 12L, 1P; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 1c’, 29, _
6L, 3P.
42. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Old whale boat on beach near anchor-
age, shade. Anopheles farauti, 1L; Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 3L; Culex (C.)
quinquefasciatus, 19, 2L. | |
43. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Treehole in deep shade near ceremo-
nial dance area, ground level. Culex (C.) pacificus, 5L; Tripteroides (R.)
melanesiensis, 22, 150L, 6P. : | |
43A. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Mosquitoes swarming and biting at
site 43. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 29.
44. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Canoe on beach, shaded. No mosqui-
toes.
45. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Treehole in village near anchorage,
partial shade. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 4L.
46. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Treehole in village, partial shade.
Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 1L.
47. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Treehole in village (Breadfruit tree),
shaded. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 6L.
48. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Brought in a bottle by a small boy,
probably from a rain barrel. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 11; Culex (Mochtho. ) fem-
ineus, 1c’; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 25L.
49. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 17. Brought in a bottle by a small boy,
probably from a rain barrel. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 1L; Culex (C.) quinque-
fasciatus, 12, 2L; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 12, 1L, 2P.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 15
50. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 18. Treehole (guava) near village, partial
shade. Culex (C.) pacificus, 7c’, 62, 82L, 12P.
51. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 18. Aluminum wing tank from airplane
made into open canoe, on beach in shade. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 10°; Trip-
teroides (R.) melanesiensis, 1c.
52. Vao, New Hebrides. Aug. 18. Ground well, rock lined, on opposite
side of island from anchorage. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 10°; Culex (Mochtho. )
femineus, 1c.
53. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 20. Ceremonial drum area,
near village, inside base of carved out hollow log drum, 1,500 ft. elevation, in
partial shade. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 10’, 12, 1P; Tripteroides (R.) melanesi-
ensis, 170", 249, 30L, 42P.
54. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 20. Leaf axil of taro plant
(Colocasia), one of nine plants examined, near ceremonial drum area. No
mosquitoes.
55. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 20. Treehole near village,
1,500 ft. elevation, shaded. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 19.
56. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 21. On trail down mountain
from village of Amok. Small shaded forest ground pool, 1,000 ft. elevation
approximately. Culex (Mochtho.) femineus, 19, 12L, 1P.
57. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 20. Pig wallowin reed area
near village. Adult mosquitoes captured while skimming on water surface.
Culex (Mochtho.) femineus, 40°; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 1c.
58. Amok, Malekula, New Hebrides. Aug. 20. Pig wallow (#57), larvae
from extremely muddy water. Culex (Lopho.) buxtoni, 2L; Culex (Mochtho. )
femineus, 10°, 13L, 1P; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 19.
59. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Treehole in deep shaded forest near
gardens of Episcopal Girls' School. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 3L.
60. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Taken while biting man in daytime at
site 59. Aedes (S.) aobae, 22; Aedes (V.) lineatus, 19.
61. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Treehole near Crater Lake in deep
shade, about 1.5 gal. Aedes (S.) aobae, 70°, 89, 6L, 5P; Culex (C.) pacificus,
20°, 2L, 2P; Culex (Lopho.) sp. 13, Aoba form 1L, 1P; Tripteroides (R.)
melanesiensis, 12, 1L, 1P.
62. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Taken while biting man in shade near
Crater Lake; vicious biters; native ducks present in lake. Aedes (S.) aobae,
19; Aedes (V.) lineatus, 50%, 59.
63. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Fish from Crater Lake. No mos-
quitoes. — ,
64. Aoba, New Hebrides. Aug. 24. Moist dirt from treehole near Lake.
Placed in water. No mosquitoes.
65. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Water in Tridacna shell in full
sunlight near village. Aedes (S.) varuae, 50%, 12; Anopheles farauti, 19, 1P.
66. Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides. Aug. 16. Female Culex with blood re-
covered on ''Varua" soon after departure from port. Eggs laid 3 days later.
Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus, 59, 18L, 4P.
67. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Taken while biting man in par-
tial shade at 1715. Armigeres (A.) breinli, 29.
68. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Treehole 10 ft. above ground,
breadfruit. No mosquitoes.
16. Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
69. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. U.S. airplane wing tank used to
catch rain water, shade. Tripteroides (T.) bonneti, 1c, 1P.
70. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Shallow ground well, full sun,
no vegetation. Anopheles farauti, 20°, 19, 4L, 2P. |
71. Lawai, Graciosa Bay, Santa Cruz. Aug. 30. Half coconut, partial
shade, near hospital. Aedes (S.) varuae, 2c", 1P.
72. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Treehole near village. Aedes
(S.) hebrideus, 2L.
73. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz. Aug. 29. Rain barrel in village, full sun-
light. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 19, 1L, 1P.
74. Lawai, Graciosa Bay, Santa Cruz. Aug. 30. Ground well. Anopheles
farauti, 19, 5L, 2P; Culex (Lopho.) sp. 15, Santa Cruz forms, 150", 2L.
75. Malo, Temotu, Santa Cruz: Aug. 29. Treehole at base of tree, shad-
ed. No mosquitoes.
76. Lawai, Graciosa Bay, Santa Cruz. Aug. 30. Rain barrel near hospi-
tal. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 2c, 12, 10L; Aedes (S.) varuae, 11L, 5P; Culex
(Lopho.) sp. 15, Santa Cruz forms, 11L.
77. Lawai, Graciosa Bay, Santa Cruz. Aug. 30. Leaf axil of ''Spiny
Palm, '' shaded area near gardens behind hospital. Aedes (S.) tulagiensis, 13L.
78. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Rain water collected in groove in trunk
of fallen tree, full sun. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 3L; Aedes (S.) varuae, 3L; Cu-
lex (Lopho.) sp. 15, Santa Cruz forms, 8L.
79. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Treehole in shade near hospital. Ae-
des (S.) tulagiensis, 7L.
80. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Female mosquito captured while egg
laying at site 78. Aedes (S.) varuae, 19.
81. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Treehole in shade. Tripteroides (R. )
melanesiensis, 20L.
82. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Leaf axil of "Spiny Palm,’’ shaded
area. No mosquitoes.
83. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Treehole near hospital, shade. Trip-
teroides (R.) melanesiensis, 6L.
84. Naelo, Reef Islands. Aug. 31. Rain barrel near hospital, partial
shade. No mosquitoes.
85. Naelo, Reef Islands. Sept. 1. Leaf axil of "Spiny Palm,'’ shaded,
Aedes (S.) tulagiensis, 25L.
86. Naelo, Reef Islands. Sept. 1. Hole in side of coconut tree cut to col-
lect rain water, on trail to hospital. Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 4L.
87. Fenualoa, Reef Islands. Sept. 3. Treehole near dispensary, shaded.
No mosquitoes.
88. Fenualoa, Reef Islands. Sept.
89. Fenualoa, Reef Islands. Sept.
90. Fenualoa, Reef Islands. Sept.
dispensary, shaded. No mosquitoes.
91. Fenualoa, Reef Islands. Sept. 3. Treehole in shade. Tripteroides
(R.) melanesiensis, 12, 1P.
92. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Treehole in shade near village. Ae-
des (S.) tulagiensis, lo’, 19, 75L, 12P; Tripteroides (R.) melanesiensis, 12,
1P.
93. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Treehole in shade. No mosquitoes.
Treehole. No mosquitoes.
Treehole. No mosquitoes.
Leaf axil of "Spiny Palm" near
Go Go OO
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 17
94. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Rain barrel in village, semi-shade
under coconut trees. No mosquitoes.
95. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Taken while biting man in daylight,
semi-shade. Armigeres (A.) breinli, 59; Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 29.
96. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Treehole in shade in forest area. Ae-
des (S.) hebrideus, 19. |
97. Nupani, Reef Islands. Sept. 5. Taken while biting man, deep shade in
bush. Armigeres (A.) breinli, 29; Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 19.
98. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Water contained in half Tridacna shell in garden,
open sunlight. Aedes (S.) varuae, 40°, 22, 1L, 7P. :
99. Sikiana. Sept. 6: Ground well near garden, open sun. Culex (C.) an-
nulirostris, 1c, 2Y,. 12.
100. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Leaf of pandanus lying on ground in semi-shade,
near gardens behind village. Aedes (S.) varuae, 10°, 32, 6L, 6P.
101. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Leaf axil of pandanus, near gardens in semi-shade.
Aedes (F.) hollingsheadi, 20°, 4P.
102. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Coconut shell, rat eaten, in bush near village. No
mosquitoes.
103. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Canal along edge of taro patch at gardens behind
village. Aedes (V.) lineatus, 59, 1L, 14P; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 1c’, 4L.
104. Sikiana. Sept. 6. Taken while biting man in daylight. Aedes (V.)
lineatus, 39. |
105. Mboli (Purvis Bay), Florida, Solomon Islands. Sept. 14. Treehole
in old log in shade near watering point. Aedes (S.) albolineatus, 10°, 22, 40L;
Tripteroides (T.) distigma, 1c, 7P.
106. Mboli (Purvis Bay), Florida, Solomon Islands. Sept. 14. Shaded
treehole in base of tree at pipeline inlet high on side of cliff. Aedes (S.) qua-
siscutellaris, 40°, 13L, 14P.
107. Mboli (Purvis Bay), Florida, Solomon Islands. Sept. 14. Rockholes
in vesicular lava rock, very numerous and large, shaded and leaves in holes.
Aedes (S.) quasiscutellaris, 20°, 19, 12L, 2P; Culex (Lopho.) sp. 18, Solo-
mons rock pool forms, 17L.
108. Mboli (Purvis Bay), Florida, Solomon Islands. Sept. 14. Treehole
in fallen rotten log, shaded. Culex (Lopho.) walukasi, 15L.
109A. Mboli (Purvis Bay), Florida, Solomon Islands. No date. Egg raft
floating in water at 107. Probably Culex (Lopho.) sp. 18, Solomon rock pool
forms.
109B. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Rat eaten coconut near village in bush area,
shaded. No mosquitoes.
110. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Ground well in village, open sun. No mos-
quitoes.
110A. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Treehole (breadfruit) near village, shaded.
Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 30L.
111. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Rain barrel in village, semi-shade. Aedes ©
(S.) hebrideus, 17L.
112. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Female caught in barrel (site 111) while
ege-laying. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 19.
113. Ontong Java. Sept. 19. Canoe along beach near village, semi-shade.
Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 20%, 30L, 3P. |
114. Nuguria, Fead. Sept. 24. Ground well behind residence, semi-shade.
Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 3L; Anopheles farauti, 4L.
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
115. Nuguria, Fead. Sept. 24. Taken while biting man in daytime near
house. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 12; Aedes (V.) lineatus, 19.
116. Nuguria, Fead. Sept. 24. Swamp area behind residence, beneath
coconut trees in semi-shade. Culex (C.) annulirostris, 20’, 42, 12L, 7P.
117. Tatau, Sos, Tabar. Sept. 29. Treehole near hospital, semi-shade.
Aedes (F. ) quasirubithorax subgroup, 17L, 2P; Aedes (S.) albolineatus, 2L;
Aedes (S.) scutellaris group, 11L; Tripteroides (T.) bimaculipes group, 12L.
118. Tatau, Sos, Tabar. Sept. 29. oa near hospital, semi-shade.
Aedes (F. Aedes (F.) notoscriptus, 1c’, 1L, 4P; Aedes (F.) papuensis subgroup, 2L;
Aedes (F.) quasirubithor ) quasirubithorax subgroup, 2L; Aedes Aedes (S.) albolineatus, ) albolineatus, 10%, 29, TL,
1P.
119. Ontong Java. Sept. 20. Old kettle with rain water in village, semi-
shade. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 10, 39, 14L, 5P; Aedes (V.) lineatus, 49.
120. Tatau, Sos, Tabar. Sept. 30. Taken while biting man in daytime on
hill behind Tom Spencer's house. No mosquitoes.
121. Nuguria, Fead. Sept. 24. Rain water in bottom of sail boat next to
house. Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 80°, 129, 25L, 15P.
122. Tatau, Sos, Tabar. Sept. 29. Ground well near school, open sun.
Anopheles farauti, 22, 3L, 2P; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 5L.
123. Lorangau, Manus, Admiralty. Oct. 4. Swamp at naval base near na-
tive hospital. Culex sp., IP.
124. Lorangau, Manus, Admiralty. Oct. 4. Taro plant leaf axil in semi-
Shade. Near water supply pumping station. No mosquitoes.
125. Lorangau, Manus, Admiralty. Oct. 4. Rain barrel near pig pen at
naval base, open sun. Aedes (F.) notoscriptus, 1L; Culex (Culicio.) fragilis,
10L, 5P.
126. Lorangau, Manus, Admiralty. Oct. 4. Tridacna shell on ground,
semi-shade. No mosquitoes.
127. Wewak, Boroam, New Guinea. Oct. 10. Ground pool, grassy, in full
sun. Anopheles farauti, 1c’, 12, 2L, 2P; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 20°, 19, 3P.
128. Wewak, Boroam, New Guinea. Oct. 10. Outrigger canoe in shade
along beach. Aedes (S. ) scutellaris, 8°, 8P.
129. Wewak, Boroam, New Guinea. Oct. 11. Outrigger canoe in shade
along beach, same as 128. Aedes (F.) notoscriptus, 2L; Aedes (S.) sp. near
gurneyi, 10°; Aedes (S.) scutellaris and scutellaris group, 90°, 122, 4L, 13P;
Culex (C.) near whittingtoni, 9L, 2P.
130. Auna, Wuvulu. Oct. 14. Treehole near village. Aedes (F.) noto-
scriptus, 10°; Aedes (S.) hebrideus, 5L; Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus, 19.
131. Aue. Wuvulu.- Oct. 14. Rain barrel, semi-shade in village. Aedes
(S.) hebrideus, 20%, 22, 40L, 8P.
132. Auna, Wuvulu. Oct. 14. Rain barrel, full sun in village. Aedes (S.)
hebrideus, 111, 3P.
133. Auna, Wuvulu. Oct. 14. Rain barrel, partial shade in village. No
mosquitoes.
134. Tobi. Oct. 20. Swamp near taro patch, full sun. Center of island,
old phosphate diggings. Culex (C.) annulirostris, 11L, 2P.
135. Tobi. Oct. 20. Treehole (Breadfruit) in deep shade near old J apa-
nese naval station. Aedes (S.) hensilli, 130’, 109, 30L, 15P.
136. Tobi. Oct. 20. Rat-eaten coconut | shade on opposite side of is-
land from village. Aedes (S.) hensilli, 129.
137. Tobi. Oct. 20. Tridacna shell in village, partial shade. Aedes (S.)
hensilli, 280%, 59, 40L, 30P.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson- Peabody Expedition 19
138. Tobi. Oct. 20. Taken while biting in daytime (1600), near village.
Aedes (S.) hensilli, 49; Culex (C.) annulirostris, 49.
139. Jolo, Sulu, Philippines.
140. Jolo, Sulu, Philippines.
lapia present; partial shade.
141. Jolo, Sulu, Philippines.
fish; open sun.
142. Jolo, Sulu, Philippines.
143. Jolo, Sulu, Philippines.
144. Siasi, Sulu, Philippines.
145. Siasi, Sulu, Philippines.
Oct. 28. Resting in provincial jail.
Oct. 31. Fish pond near provincial jail; Ti-
Oct. 31. Stagnant pool in school garden; no
Oct. 31. Ditch near fish pond, partial shade.
Oct. 31. Funeral urn in cemetery, open sun.
Nov. 2. Swamp near constabulary barracks.
Nov. 2. Near barracks, ground pool with
waste water from wash house, open sun.
146. Siasi, Sulu, Philippines.
partial shade.
147. Siasi, Sulu, Philippines.
pensary.
148. Bongao, Sulu, Philippines.
149. Bongao, Sulu, Philippines.
Nov. 2. Near barracks, pipe in ground,
Nov. 2. Treehole at base of tree near dis-
Nov. 5. Treehole near school, shaded.
Nov. 5. Treehole near school, shaded.
150. Sanga Sanga, Sulu, Philippines. Nov. 6. Treehole in coconut tree
along trail, partial shade.
151. Sanga Sanga, Sulu, Philippines. Nov. 6. Canoe in sea-gypsy camp,
open sun.
152. Sandaken, North Borneo.
153. Keningau, North Borneo.
154. Keningau, North Borneo.
Nov. 18. Ground pools in center of town.
Nov. 25. Ground pool, partial shade.
Nov. 25. Bamboo stumps.
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
1. Anopheles (Cellia) farauti Laveran, 1902
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (42). *Tikopia (27). Santa Cruz Is-
lands: *Vanikoro (41), Santa Cruz (74), *Temotu (65, 70). *Nuguria (114).
*Tabar Islands: Tatau (122). New Guinea: Wewak (127).
This widespread and important vector of malaria and periodic filariasis is
sometimes considered to be a subspecies of punctulatus Doenitz, 1901 and has
been confused with the latter in the past. All the rather scanty and poor ano-
pheline material from the area covered by this report appears to be referable
to farauti but there is considerable variation in the larvae from the different
populations. The present records extend the range of this species to several
outlying islands but not beyond Buxton's line. Of particular interest is the
collection from Tikopia which is said to be malaria-free and also the one from
the Nuguria atoll. There is a strong possibility that farauti is spread to some
extent by natives in canoes but natural dispersal (possibly by birds) cannot be
discounted even to atolls if they have exposed fresh or brackish water (in taro
gardens at least). A. farauti is largely a nocturnal biter but has been reported
attacking man occasionally in the daytime.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
2. Culex (C.) pacificus Edwards, 1916
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (43, 50), *Aoba (61).
C. pacificus appears to be an entirely innocuous species and is precinctive
to the New Hebrides.
Culex (C.) ee ee Say, 1823
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (42, 49), Espiritu Santo (66). *Santa
Cruz Islands: Vanikoro (34, 35). *Wuvulu (130).
The ubiquitous Southern House Mosquito, iyo known as C. fatigans, is an
introduced species in the South Pacific and appears to be associated almost ex-
clusively with Europeans and other adventive populations on or near the coasts
and is seldom found in native villages. C. quinquefasciatus is primarily a
crepuscular and nocturnal biter.
4. Culex (C.) near whittingtoni Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -New Guinea: *Wewak (129).
Other collections of this form were made during the war in New Guinea.
It appears to be quite similar to litoralis Bohart, 1946 from the Marianas and >
may be conspeciric with whittingtoni from the Solomons. Nothing is known of
the blood feeding habits of this species.
5. Culex (C.) annulirostris Skuse, 1889
LOCALITIES. - *Rotuma (10, 14). Tikopia (27). *Santa Cruz Islands: Va-
nikoro (41). *Sikiana (99, 103). *Nuguria (116). *Tabar Islands: Tatau (122).
New Guinea: Wewak (127). *Tobi Island (134, 138).
C. annulirostris is probably the most widespread and most variable mos-
quito in the South Pacific area. In spite of its abundance and attraction to man
this species does not appear to be important in the transmission of any human
disease in the South Pacific although its role as a vector has not been thor-
oughly investigated in this area. It breeds commonly in canoes and various
types of artificial containers and may therefore be dispersed, in part at least,
by man. C. annulirostris is predominantly a crepuscular and nocturnal biter.
6. Culex (C.) squamosus (Taylor, 1914)
det. E. N. Marks
LOCALITY. -*Wuvulu (130.
This species is represented by a single female which is "unusually small...
but I have a very similar male from Nadzab, N. G. which is an undoubted squa-
_mosus" (Marks, in litt.). C. squamosus is apparently not attracted to man.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition hee?
7. Culex (Culiciomyia) fragilis Ludlow, 1903
LOCALITY. -*Admiralty Islands: Manus (125).
It is surprising that this widespread Oriental, Indomalayan and Austral-
asian species was collected only once on the expedition. C. fragilis is pri-
marily a container breeder but is known to utilize ground pools as well. It ap-
pears to be closely associated with man but is not known to bite.
8. Culex (Mochtogenes) femineus Edwards, 1926
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (48, 52), Malekula (56, 57, 58).
This innocuous relict species is precinctive to the New Hebrides.
9. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) buxtoni Edwards, 1926
LOCALITY. -New Hebrides: *Malekula (58).
This species has been variously considered to be a variety or subspecies
of hilli Edwards, 1922 or conspecific with fraudatrix (Theobald, 1905) or solo-
monis Edwards, 1929. However it appears to be a distinct form which is prob-
ably precinctive to the New Hebrides although very similar forms have been
found in the Belep group north of New Caledonia and on Rennell and Bellona is-
lands. C. buxtoni seldom attacks man and appears to be of no economic im-
portance.
10. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) walukasi Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -Solomon Islands: Florida (108).
This form has been confused in the past with solomonis Edwards, 1929. It
appears to be exclusively a container breeder and is not known to feed on man.
11. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 13 (Aoba form)
LOCALITY. -*New Hebrides: Aoba (61).
This form remains undescribed as it is represented only by 1 larva and 1
pupa. It seems to be very similar to one of the forms mentioned under the
following species.
12. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 15 (Santa Cruz forms)
LOCALITIES. -Santa Cruz Islands: *Vanikoro (32), Santa Cruz (74, 76).
Reef Islands: Naelo (78).
It appears that at least 2 species are represented in this material which
consists entirely of larvae but it is possible that one of these is conspecific
with Culex (Lophoceraomyia) sp. 13 from Aoba. One of these forms may also
be conspecific with 2 females previously collected on Santa Cruz Island (A. G.
Carment, BMNH). Some of the larvae were collected in containers and it
seems probable that one of the species was introduced to Naelo. It is probable
that these forms seldom if ever bite man.
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
13. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 18 (Solomons rock pool forms)
LOCALITY. -Solomon Islands: Florida (107, 109A).
This unnamed form is represented by larvae and possibly an egg raft.
None of the related forms are known to bite man.
14. Culex sp.
LOCALITY. -*Admiralty Islands: Manus (123).
A single pupa of a species of Culex cannot be identified with certainty but
may possibly be annulirostris.
15. Aedes (Finlaya) sp. in quasirubithorax subgroup
det. E. N. Marks
LOCALITY. -*Tabar Islands: Tatau (117, 118).
This species is represented only by larvae and pupae. E. N. Marks (in
litt.) states that "specific identification of larvae in this subgroup cannot at
present be made with certainty and there is some doubt whether the species
recorded as quasirubithorax from New Guinea is in fact that species."' It is
probable that this species does not attack man.
16. Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus (Skuse, 1889)
LOCALITIES. -*Tabar Islands: Tatau (118). *Admiralty Islands: Manus
(125). New Guinea: Wewak (129). *Wuvulu (130).
No data are available on the blood feeding habits of this form in the area
covered by the expedition, all collections consisting of immature stages or
reared adults.
17. Aedes (Finlaya) sp. probably in papuensis subgroup
det. E. N. Marks
LOCALITY. -*Tabar Islands: Tatau (118).
Only 2 second instar larvae were collected and these cannot be definitely
identified. It is probable that this species does not bite man.
18. Aedes (Finlaya) hollingsheadi Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -*Sikiana (101).
This species is a member of the kochi group and is widespread in the Solo-
mon Islands proper (Bougainville, Arundel, New Georgia, Guadalcanal). The
Sikiana material, reared from pandanus leaf axils, appears to be very similar
to that from Guadalcanal. It seems probable that this species was introduced
by the natives to Sikiana in pandanus or possibly taro from the Solomons. This
species has never been collected biting.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson- Peabody Expedition 23
19. Aedes (Finlaya) oceanicus Belkin, 1962
LOCALITIES. -Samoa: Tutuila (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7). ?*Hoorn (Horne, Futu-
na) Islands: Alofi (10-2), record questionable.
This member of the kochi group has been confused in the past with samo-
anus (Gruenberg, 1913). It is known from the 3 main islands of Samoa and from
Vavau and Tongatabu in the Tonga group and may be present also on Wallis Is-
land. I suspect that this species originated through hybridization between 2
other members of the kochi group, possibly samoanus and fijiensis Marks, 1947.
The distribution of this species is suggestive of dispersal by natives probably in
the egg, larval and pupal stages in taro and possibly pandanus carried in canoes.
This dispersal has not been as extensive as in the case of Aedes (Stegomyia)
polynesiensis probably because of a lesser degree of salt tolerance in the im-
mature stages and more exacting ecological requirements in the breeding sites.
The above-mentioned record from Alofi Island is questionable since it is based
on a Single larva included in an individual rearing of a treehole breeding form
(Aedes (Stegomyia) futunae); it is possible that this larva is a contamination
from a collection made on Tutuila. Since it has been shown that members of
the kochi group may be involved in the transmission of non-periodic filariasis
(Symes, Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., Trans. 49: 280-282, 1955) and since
oceanicus and samoanus were confused in epidemiological studies on Samoa,
the vector propensities of these forms should be investigated anew. In all
probability this species is nocturnal like its relative, samoanus, but there is
no definite information on its blood feeding habits.
20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus (Taylor, 1914)
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Aoba. *Santa Cruz Islands: Vanikoro (36,
37). Sikiana (103, 104). Ontong Java (119). *Nuguria.
This widespread species does not extend east of Buxton's line. A. lineatus
is frequently found breeding near villages and in taro gardens. It appears to
have been extensively dispersed by natives probably in the egg stage in soil at-
tached to taro or other cultigens. However it is possible that some of this dis-
persal has been accomplished by natural means (egg stage by wind and birds).
Although it is frequently abundant and feeds avidly on man in the daytime, li-
neatus is not known to be involved in the transmission of any human disease.
21. Aedes (Aedimorphus) nocturnus (Theobald, 1903)
LOCALITY. -*Rotuma (10, 19, 20).
The exact taxonomic status of this widespread Pacific form cannot be de-
termined at present. It has been regarded often as a subspecies of vexans >
(Meigen, 1830) which is represented in all the major zoogeographic regions
except the Malagasy, Ethiopian and Neotropical. A. nocturnus is frequently
found breeding in taro gardens in the South Pacific where it does not occur to-
gether with Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus except in the New Hebrides. For the
present I regard nocturnus as a distinct species but it is possible that it is
nothing more than a strain of vexans which has been widely dispersed in the
ege stage in soil by natives as well as recent adventives. It is also possible
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1969
that nocturnus, like lineatus, has been dispersed by wind as well as by birds.
Females of nocturnus attack man readily in the neighborhood of breeding sites
and may become serious nocturnal pests following heavy rains but are not known
to be involved in disease transmission.
22. Aedes (Stegomyia) albolineatus (Theobald, 1904)
LOCALITIES. -Solomon Islands: Florida (105). *Tabar Islands: Tatau (117,
118),
A. albolineatus, as currently understood, exhibits a great deal of variation
throughout its wide reported range in the Australasian, Indo-malayan and Ori-
ental regions and it is possible that several forms are confused under this spe-
cies. Although at times very abundant, this container breeder is seldom at-
tracted to man and appears to be entirely innocuous.
23. Aedes (Stegomyia) tulagiensis Edwards, 1926
LOCALITIES. -Santa Cruz Islands: Santa Cruz (77). *Reef Islands: Naelo
(79, 85), Nupani (92).
One of the outstanding entomological contributions of the expedition has
been the discovery of tulagiensis and the closely related A. (Steg. ) robinsoni
in the Santa Cruz Islands. A. tulagiensis was formerly known by the 2 females
of the original collection and there was some doubt as to whether it came from
the Santa Cruz Islands or the Solomons. These 2 species I have placed provi-
sionally in the edwardsi group which is represented elsewhere in the world only
by edwardsi (Barraud, 1923) from the Andaman Islands and a similar if not
identical form from southern Indochina. In describing tulagiensis Edwards
considered it to be only a variety of edwardsi. Although these 2 forms are su-
perficially very similar there is no question in my mind that they are specifi-
cally distinct to judge by the differences in ornamentation and chaetotaxy of the
adults and the male genitalia. It may even be that edwardsi is not closely re-
lated to the South Pacific species but without comparison of the immature sta-
ges (unknown in edwardsi and the Indochinese form) this problem cannot be re-
solved.
The remarkable disjunct distribution of the edwardsi group might prompt
the speculation that tulagiensis and robinsoni have been introduced into the San-
ta Cruz group by Polynesians from the Malayan area along a southern route in-
to the South Pacific. However it seems to me that the edwardsi group is a rel-
‘ict one and human migrations have had nothing to do with the disjunct distribu-
tions as we see them today. A further possibility is that the group, if itis a
monophyletic one, has been overlooked in intermediate areas. The South Pa-
cific species of the group show a combination of characters of the albolineatus
and scutellaris groups and there is a strong suggestion that they may have
arisen through hybridization between members of these 2 groups. Such hy-
bridization may have occurred independently in the west between different mem-
bers of the same groups and therefore edwardsi and the Indochinese form may
represent an entirely different phyletic line from that of tulagiensis and robin-
soni. This fascinating phylogenetic problem cannot be resolved with our pres-
ent knowledge of these species. A. tulagiensis has been found breeding in
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 25
treeholes and in a ''spiny palm" (pandanus?). The bionomics of the adults are
unknown but it would appear from the capture of the 2 females of the type collec-
tion that this species is attracted to man. :
24. Aedes (Stegomyia) robinsoni Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -*Santa Cruz Islands: Vanikoro (38, 40).
This species is a close relative of tulagiensis (see above) and appears to
be precinctive to the island of Vanikoro. It is remarkable that there are 2 spe-
cies of the same group in the Santa Cruz group on islands separated by a dis-
tance of less than 100 miles. This species was not taken biting.
25. Aedes (Stegomyia) aobae Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -*New Hebrides: Aoba (60, 61, 62).
This is a remarkable member of the scutellaris group that is known also
by a single female from Vanua Lava Island in the Banks group north of the New
Hebrides. Three females of this species were taken biting on Aoba.
26. Aedes (Stegomyia) futunae Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -*Hoorn (Horne, Futuna) Islands: Alofi (8, 9, 10).
This form is a very clearly marked species of the scutellaris- group that is
undoubtedly endemic to this group of islands. It appears to be the dominant
member of the group on Alofi and may be an equally or more important vector
of filariasis in the group than polynesiensis which has also been collected on
Alofi. It was taken biting man in the bush in the daytime.
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus Edwards, 1926
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (42, 43A, 48, 49, 51, 52), Malekula
(53).« Tikopia (22: 25; 26; 29, 30,°31;.31A), . Santa Crug Islands: Santa Cruz
(76), *Temotu (72, 73). Reef Islands: *Naelo (78), Nupani (95, 96, 97). On-
tong Java (110, 111, 112, 113, 119). *Nuguria (114, 115, 121). *Wuvulu
(130, 131,432):
This form -has been synonymized in recent years with scutellaris (Walker,
1859) but I find that it differs from the latter in constant details of the claspette
of the male genitalia and therefore regard it as a distinct species for the pres-
ent. This species is known only from the above-mentioned localities and from
Rennell and Bellona islands.
From the known distribution it appears that hebrideus has been dispersed
by the western Polynesians in a manner similar to polynesiensis by eastern
Polynesians. The original home of hebrideus cannot be determined at present
but it seems to me that the most likely site is somewhere in the New Hebrides-
Santa Cruz area. There is a possibility also that hebrideus, as polynesiensis,
is a species of hybrid origin. Whatever its origin, hebrideus appears to have
been dispersed by Polynesians along the outlying islands of the Solomons, Bis-
marck Archipelago and New Guinea. It is of interest that hebrideus is not found
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
on Sikiana which has instead a population of varuae, undoubtedly spread from
the Santa Cruz area. !
The population of hebrideus from Wuvulu is an aberrant one as noted by
E. N. Marks, who identified it as scutellaris and noted some similarity with a
form of scutellaris from the Admiralty Islands (in litt.). It seems probable
that some introgression between these forms is occurring on Wuvulu which shows
indication of the introduction of mosquitoes from adjacent areas in the presence
of Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus and Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus. A. hebrideus
is a persistant diurnal biter apparently throughout its range.
28. Aedes (Stegomyia) hensilli Farner, 1945
det. R. M. Bohart
LOCALITY. -*Tobi Island (135, 136, 137, 138).
The population of the scutellaris group on Tobi shows a condition which may
be analogous to that found in hebrideus on Wuvulu. Basically the Tobi form ap-
pears to be hensilli which, according to R. M. Bohart (in litt.), shows con-
siderable variation through most of its known range in the Carolines from Pa-
lau to Nukuoro Atoll. However, I believe that this population shows introgres-
sion with scutellaris which has been reported from the adjacent large island
groups to the west of Tobi as well as from the western Carolines. This form
was taken biting in the daytime on Tobi.
29. Aedes (Stegomyia) polynesiensis Marks, 1951
LOCALITIES. -Samoa: Tutuila (6). *Hoorn (Horne, Futuna) Islands: Alofi
(9, 10,11).
This most important vector of non-periodic filariasis in the South Pacific
is known only from the immense area south of the equator from Fiji and the
Ellice Islands eastward to the Marquesas and Easter Island. Its original home
is not known and it is possible that it was formed through hybridization between
2 other members of the scutellaris group in the South Pacific, one of which
may have been pseudoscutellaris (Theobald, 1910) from Fiji and the other upo-
lensis Marks, 1957 from Samoa. At any rate it is quite clear that polynesien-
sis has been widely dispersed by the eastern Polynesians, probably as breed-
ing populations in canoes. It is of interest that polynesiensis does not occur
on some of the more remote islands or groups in the southeastern Pacific
area such as Rotuma, Niue and Tonga and that it has not been carried over
Buxton's line into the area occupied by the western Polynesians. There is a
suggestion that polynesiensis has contributed to the formation of the Niue spe-
cies through hybridization with tongae Edwards, 1926 and that on Wallis Is-
land hybridization may be occurring at present between polynesiensis and an
endemic form. On the other hand in several other areas polynesiensis occurs
sympatrically with closely related species, notably pseudoscutellaris and hor-
rescens in Fiji, upolensis in Samoa, and futunae in the Hoorn group. A. poly-
nesiensis is largely a diurnal biter but is said to show a distinct peak in biting
activity in late afternoon and a lesser one in early morning.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 27
30. Aedes (Stegomyia) quasiscutellaris Farner & Bohart, 1944
LOCALITY. -Solomon Islands: Florida (106, 107).
A. quasiscutellaris is the dominant member of the scutellaris group in the
Solomons proper and has been reported elsewhere only from Nissan Island but
the latter record may be erroneous. This species very seldom bites man in
the Solomons.
31. Aedes (Stegomyia) rotumae Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -Rotuma (2, 13). 14,:15,-17, 18, 20, 21);
It has been known for some time that the population of the scutellaris
group on the isolated island of Rotuma was distinct from any of the described
species. The material collected on the expedition included all stages of this
species and permitted its description. This species is apparently the only mem-
ber of the scutellaris group on Rotuma and therefore it is presumed to be the
vector of filariasis on this island. However only one female was taken biting
at night along with numerous Aedes (Aedimorphus) nocturnus and apparently
none were found biting during the day.
32. Aedes (Stegomyia) scutellaris (Walker, 1859)
LOCALITY. -New Guinea: Wewak (128, 129).
The common species of the scutellaris group in New Guinea is considered
for the present to be conspecific with the true scutellaris from the Aru Islands.
As indicated above the ''scutellaris"’ of the New Hebrides, Santa Cruz group
and the Polynesian outliers of the Solomons, Bismarcks, and New Guinea is
treated here as a distinct form, hebrideus. A. scutellaris is said to be a vi-
cious diurnal biter in New Guinea.
33. Aedes (Stegomyia) varuae Belkin, 1962
LOCALITIES. -*Santa Cruz Islands: Vanikoro (33, 38), Santa Cruz (71, 76),
Temotu (65). *Reef Islands: Naelo (78, 80). Sikiana (98, 100).
This member of the scutellaris group has long been confused with tongae
Edwards, 1926 from the Tonga Islands and this prompted the speculation in
Buxton and Hopkins (London Sch. Hyg. Trop. Med., Mem. 1: 103, 1927) that
the Tongans transported this mosquito on their voyages. The material of all
stages collected on the expedition clearly establishes that this species is dis-
tinct from tongae. It shares with the latter only superficial features in orna-
mentation and the development of the claspette of the male genitalia. This spe-
cies was undoubtedly introduced by the natives to Sikiana. It is of interest that
this species competes successfully with hebrideus which is dominant in the
area. There are suggestions that varuae may have been formed through hy-
bridization. This species was not taken biting on the expedition.
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
34. Aedes (Stegomyia) sp. near gurneyi
LOCALITY. -*New Guinea: Wewak (129).
The single known male resembles gurneyi Stone & Bohart, 1944 from the
Solomons in general features but differs in details of ornamentation and of the
claspette. It was mass reared from a collection containing scutellaris and it
appears that some of the larvae in this collection may be of this species (see
next species). This undoubtedly new species cannot be described without addi-
tional material.
35. Aedes (Stegomyia) sp. in scutellaris group
LOCALITIES. -*Tabar Islands: Tatau (117). New Guinea: Wewak (129).
Included here are forms of the scutellaris-group that cannot be identified
with certainty because of poor condition or absence of males. It is probable
that both collections are of the New Guinea scutellaris but it is possible that the
form on Tatau is hebrideus and that the Wewak collection contains larvae of the
preceding species.
36. Armigeres (A.) breinli (Taylor, 1914)
LOCALITIES. -*Santa Cruz Islands: Temotu (67). *Reef Islands: Nupani
(95, 977). Ce ae an hae
These collections represent the easternmost records of this species which
is otherwise known from the Solomons, Bismarcks and New Guinea. A. breinli
typically breeds in coconut shells with a great deal of decaying meat. Although
it is possible that this species has been spread to the Santa Cruz area by na-
tives, the absence of this form from the outlying islands in the Solomons sug-
gests that breinli is not readily transported over ocean barriers and therefore
it seems probable that its presence in the Santa Cruz area is due to natural dis-
persal. A. breinli is a vicious diurnal biter around native villages, particu-
larly in the shade.
37. Tripteroides (T.) bonneti Belkin, 1962
LOCALITY. -* Santa Cruz Islands: Temotu (69).
The discovery of this species in the Santa Cruz Islands is of great zoogeo-
graphic interest since it connects the distribution of the subgenus Tripteroides
in Fiji and the Solomons. This relict form shows a number of unusual features
and may have to be placed into a separate group when the larva is discovered.
It is not known to bite man.
38. Tripteroides (T.) distigma (Edwards, 1925)
LOCALITY. -Solomon Islands: *Florida (105).
This unusual species was formerly known only by the holotype female from
Tulagi. The material collected on the expedition includes a male reared from
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson- Peabody Expedition 29
a pupa which is definitely distigma and 6 larvae which are presumably of this
species since they were found together with the pupa and since throughout the
Solomons there appears to be only one species of this group in any given local-
ity. T. distigma is probably seldom attracted to man.
39. Tripteroides (T.) sp. in bimaculipes group
LOCALITY. -* Tabar Islands: Tatau (117).
Since specific identification of larvae (the only stage collected) is impos-
sible in this group this species cannot be identified at present. The bimaculi-
pes group shows a great deal of local speciation and it is possible that this form
is an endemic relict on the Tabar Islands.
40. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) rotumanus (Edwards, 1929)
LOCALITY. -Rotuma (18).
T. rotumanus is an innocuous container breeder precinctive to Rotuma.
The presence of this member of the caledonicus group, which includes melane-
siensis, on the isolated island of Rotuma is of great zoogeographic interest.
41. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) melanesiensis Belkin, 1955
LOCALITIES. -New Hebrides: *Vao (40, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 51), Malekula
(53, 55, 57, 58), *Aoba (59, 61). *Tikopia (23, 27, 31). *Santa Cruz Islands:
- Vanikoro (33, 38, 40). *Reef Islands: Naelo (81, 83, 86), Fenualoa (91), Nu-
pani (92).
T. melanesiensis, formerly confused with caledonicus (Edwards, 1922), is
a dominant container breeding species reported previously from New Caledo-
nia, Loyalty Islands, New Hebrides and Banks Islands. The new records men-
tioned above from Tikopia, Santa Cruz and Reef Islands are of considerable
zoogeographic interest. T. melanesiensis may have been dispersed by natives
rather widely since it appears to be highly tolerant of conditions in breeding
sites and is known to breed in canoes. However it seems probable that its oc-
currence in the Santa Cruz group is due to natural dispersal. This species is
easily overlooked since the females are seldom attracted to man.
GEOGRAPHIC TREATMENT
In the following treatment of the mosquito fauna of the individual islands
or island groups the numbers preceding the species name refer to the se-
quence in which the species are discussed in the Taxonomic Treatment.
For additional remarks on individual species see these discussions.
SAMOA
Only 2 container breeding species of mosquitoes are represented in the col-
lections, both reported in the past from Tutuila and the other islands of the
group.
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
SPECIES COLLECTED:
19. Aedes (Finlaya) oceanicus: Tutuila (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7). Indigenous or
| introduced.
29. Aedes (Stegomyia) polynesiensis: Tutuila (6). Indigenous or introduced
HOORN (HORNE, FUTUNA) ISLANDS
As far as I can determine these are the first records of mosquitoes from
this group. The record of Aedes (Finlaya) oceanicus may be erroneous; it is
based on a single larva included in an individual rearing of Aedes (Stegomyia)
futunae and may be the result of contamination with material collected in Samoa.
The precinctive Aedes (Stegomyia) futunae appears to be at least as common
and as strongly anthropophilic as polynesiensis and therefore may be an im-
portant vector of filariasis in this group.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*19,. Aedes (Finlaya) oceanicus: Alofi (10-2). The record is questionable,
see above.
*26. Aedes (Stegomyia) futunae: Alofi (8, 9, 10). Precinctive.
*29. Aedes (Stegomyia) polynesiensis: Alofi (9, 10, 11). Probably spread
by natives.
ROTUMA
Only one previous mosquito collection has been made on the isolated is-
land of Rotuma. It is of interest that the ubiquitous Aedes (Stegomyia) polyne-
siensis is apparently not found on this island. The related precinctive Aedes
(Stegomyia) rotumae is therefore presumably the vector of filariasis on Rotuma.
All the previously reported species of mosquitoes from the island are repre-
sented in the expedition collections except Toxorhynchites sp. introduced by
R. W. Paine (1934).
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: (10, 14). Indigenous or introduced.
*21. Aedes (Aedimorphus) nocturnus: (10, 19, 20). Indigenous or intro-
duced.
31. Aedes (Stegomyia) rotumae: (12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21). Pre-
cinctive.
40. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) rotumanus: (18). Precinctive.
NEW HEBRIDES
Among the 10 species collected by the expedition on 4 islands in the New
Hebrides are 2 species new to this group, bringing the total of mosquitoes def-
initely known to inhabit these islands to 28. The islands of Aoba and Vao have
apparently never been sampled for mosquitoes before.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
1. Anopheles farauti: *Vao (42). Indigenous.
2. Culex (C.) pacificus: *Vao (43, 50), *Aoba (61). Precinctive.
3. Culex {C,) quinquefasciatus: *Vao (42, 49), Espiritu Santo (66). In-
troduced.
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson- Peabody Expedition dL
8. Culex (Mochthogenes) femineus: *Vao (48, 52), Malekula (56, 57, 58).
Precinctive.
9. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) buxtoni: Malekula (58). Probably precinctive.
*11. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 13: Aoba (61). Probably
precinctive.
20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus: *Aoba (60, 62). Indigenous.
*25. Aedes (Stegomyia)-aobae: Aoba (60, 61, 62). Indigenous, known else-
where only on Vanua Lava, Banks Islands.
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: *Vao (42, 43A, 48, 49, 51, 52). Male-
kula (53). Probably indigenous.
41. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) melanesiensis: *Vao (40, 43, 45, 46,
47, 48, 51), Malekula (53, 55, 57, 58), *Aoba (59, 61). Indigenous.
TIKOPIA (TICOPIA, TUCOPIA)
I have seen only one other mosquito collection from Tikopia (Sydney Univ. ,
School of Public Health and Tropical Med.) and this consisted of 2 of the spe-
cies collected on the expedition. It is probable that all 4 species have been in-
troduced to the island by the natives, although it is possible that farauti and
annulirostris are indigenous. The record of farauti is of particular interest
since this island is reported to be malaria free.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*1. Anopheles farauti: (27).
5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: (27).
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: (22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 31A).
*41. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) melanesiensis: (23, 27, 31).
SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
The collections of the expedition have added 8 species to the 4 previously
known from these islands and all the latter were also collected. These collec-
tions are of extraordinary interest and they indicate, as I had suspected, that
this area is the most critical one for an understanding of the dispersal of mos-
quitoes in the South Pacific both before and after the advent of man. All the
species are considered here to be either indigenous or endemic except Culex
(C.) quinquefasciatus which is a European introduction, but it is possible that
some of the other species have been spread by natives from adjacent areas.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
1. Anopheles farauti: *Vanikoro (41), Santa Cruz (74), *Temotu (65, 70).
Indigenous.
*3. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus: Vanikoro (34, 35). Introduced.
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: Vanikoro (41). Indigenous.
12. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 15: *Vanikoro (32), Santa
Cruz (74, 76). Probable precinctive.
*20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus: Vanikoro (36, 37). Indigenous.
23. Aedes (Stegomyia) tulagiensis: Santa Cruz (77). Precinctive.
*24. Aedes (Stegomyia) robinsoni: Vanikoro (38, 40). Precinctive.
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: Santa Cruz (76), *Temotu (72, 73).
Probably indigenous.
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
*33. Aedes (Stegomyia) varuae: Vanikoro (33, 38), Santa Cruz (71, 76),
Temotu (65). Probably originally precinctive and spread by natives
to Sikiana.
*36. Armigeres (A.) breinli: Temotu (67). Probably indigenous.
*37. Tripteroides (T.) bonneti: Temotu (69). Precinctive.
*41. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) melanesiensis: Vanikoro (33, 38, 40).
Probably indigenous.
REEF (SWALLOW, MATEMA) ISLANDS
Only one species of mosquito was previously known from these islands.
This and 5 additional species collected by the expedition are all known from the
adjacent Santa Cruz Islands. Although it is possible that some of these species
are indigenous, all of them are considered for the present to have been spread
by the natives.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*12. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 15: Naelo (78).
*23. Aedes (Stegomyia) tulagiensis: Naelo (79, 85), Nupani (92).
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: *Naelo (78), Nupani (95, 96, 977).
*33. Aedes (Stegomyia) varuae: Naelo (78, 80).
*36. Armigeres (A.) breinli: Nupani (95, 97).
*41. Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) melanesiensis: Naelo (81, 83, 86),
Fenualoa (91), Nupani (92).
SIKIANA (SIKAIANA, STEWART)
Of the 3 species formerly known from Sikiana only Anopheles farauti was
not collected on the expedition and 2 additional species were found. The dis-
covery of Aedes (Finlaya) hollingsheadi is of particular interest (see Taxonomic
Treatment). All the species are considered here to have been spread by na-
tives from adjacent islands but it is possible that at least annulirostris has been
dispersed by natural means.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: (99, 103).
*18. Aedes (Finlaya) hollingsheadi: (101).
20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus: (103, 104).
33. Aedes (Stegomyia) varuae: (98, 100).
SOLOMON ISLANDS
The mosquito collections of the expedition in the Solomons proper were
confined to Florida Island. No additions were made to the 102 species known
from the group but the rediscovery of Tripteroides (T.) distigma was a very
significant contribution.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
10. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) walukasi: Florida (108).
13. Culex (Lophoceraomyia) South Pacific sp. 18: Florida (107, 109A).
22. Aedes (Stegomyia) albolineatus: Florida (105).
Belkin: Mosquitoes of Robinson-Peabody Expedition 33
30. Aedes (Stegomyia) quasiscutellaris: Florida (106, 107).
38. Tripteroides (T.)-distigma: *Florida (105).
ONTONG JAVA (LORD HOWE ATOLL)
Of the 5 species previously definitely known from this very large atoll, Ano-
pheles farauti, Culex (C.) sitiens Wiedemann, 1828 and Culex (C.) annulirostris
were not found. All the species occurring on the atoll appear to have been in-
troduced by the natives.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus: (119).
27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: (110, 111, 112, 113, 119).
NUGURIA (FEAD) ISLANDS
No previous collections of mosquitoes are known from these atolls. All the
species found are probably introduced by the natives.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*1. Anopheles farauti: (114).
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: (116).
*20. Aedes (Verrallina) lineatus: (115).
*27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: (114, 115, 121).
TABAR (GARDNER) ISLANDS
I have not been able to find any record of previous collections from these
high islands. In view of the nature of the mosquito fauna of these islands and
their proximity to New Ireland it seems probable that the species found are
largely indigenous or possibly introduced from New Ireland. The village of Ta-
tau is on the island of Tatau which is also known as Korumbo or Sos and is the
large middle island of the 3 in the group.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*1. Anopheles farauti: Tatau (122).
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: Tatau (122).
*15. Aedes (Finlaya) sp. in quasirubithorax subgroup: Tatau (117, 118).
*16. Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus: Tatau (118).
*17. Aedes (Finlaya) sp. in papuensis subgroup: Tatau (118).
*22. Aedes (Stegomyia) albolineatus: Tatau (117, 118).
*35. Aedes (Stegomyia) sp. in scutellaris group: Tatau (117).
*39. Tripteroides (T.) sp. in bimaculipes group: Tatau (117).
ADMIRALTY ISLANDS
Apparently none of the 3 species collected on Manus Island have been re-
ported previously in the literature (Iyengar, So. Pacific Comn., Tech. Paper
86, 1955).
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 4, 1965
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*7, Culex (Culiciomyia) fragilis: Manus (125).
*14. Culex sp.: Manus (123).
*16. Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus: Manus (125).
NEW GUINEA
The 3 collections made near Wewak contain species which all have been
previously reported from New Guinea except for an undescribed form in the
scutellaris group of Aedes (Stegomyia).
SPECIES COLLECTED:
1. Anopheles farauti: Wewak (127).
4. Culex (C.) near whittingtoni: *Wewak (129).
5. Culex (C.} annulirostris: Wewak (127).
16. Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus: Wewak (129).
32. Aedes (Stegomyia) scutellaris: Wewak (128, 129).
*34. Aedes (Stegomyia) sp. near gurneyi: Wewak (129).
35. Aedes (Stegomyia) sp. in scutellaris group: Wewak (129).
WUVULU (WUWULU, MATTY, MATY) ISLAND
As far as I have been able to determine the expedition's collection of mos-
quitoes is the first to have been made on this low coral island covered with an
extensive coconut plantation. All 4 species are probably introduced although
squamosus may be indigenous. I have identified the species in the scutellaris
group as hebrideus on the basis of the male claspette but the ornamentation of.
the legs is suggestive of the populations of scutellaris in the Admiralty Islands
(Marks, in litt. ). It seems probable that 2 stocks of the scutellaris groups
have been introduced to this island but it is impossible to tell which of the two,
hebrideus or scutellaris, was the first introduction. Culex (C.) quinquefascia-
tus is undoubtedly a European introduction and the remaining species are typi-
cal New Guinea forms.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*3. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus: (130).
*§. Culex (C.)} squamosus: (130).
*16. Aedes (Finlaya) notoscriptus: (130).
*27. Aedes (Stegomyia) hebrideus: (130; 131, 132).
TOBI (LORD NORTH) ISLAND
No mosquito collections have been previously reported from this island.
Both species found are in all probability introduced. The interesting problem
of hensilli, a species in the scutellaris group, is discussed in the Taxonomic
Treatment.
SPECIES COLLECTED:
*5. Culex (C.) annulirostris: (134, 138).
*28. Aedes (Stegomyia) hensilli: (135, 136, 137, 138).
nif
Rea
AS |
Bak
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
> 900
war * °
Volume 1, Number 5, 1965
_ MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
V. Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America.
By John N. Belkin, Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J.
Heinemann.
PUBLICATIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Contribution Series
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number,
with separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a
volume. Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes
are $12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with
its beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total
less than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders or correspondence to the
American Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
Volume I
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumoni-
dae). 75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2. Belkin, John N., etal. 1965. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America. .
Belkin, John N., etal. 1965. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation
of mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 3. In preparation.
No. 4. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. 1965. Two new Aedes from Tonga and
Samoa.
Belkin, John N. 1965. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of Salem
expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
No. 5. Belkin, John N., etal. 1965. Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America.
95 pages. Price: $2.75, postpaid
Memoir Series
The Memoirs are for book-length monographs on insects. They are issued as cloth-bound
volumes, at irregular intervals as suitable manuscripts are available. Numbers are sold
separately, or in subscriptions to the series. Subscribers receive a 10% discount from the regu-
lar price. Address orders or correspondence to the American Entomological Institute, 5950
Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Issued to date:
No. 1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta. 1961. A catalogue
and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. 522 pages.
Price: $14.50, postpaid
No. 2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra i Gupta. 1962. Ichneumonidae of America north
of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. 305 pages, 162 maps,
116 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
No. 3. Dasch, Clement E. 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5. Sub-
family Diplazontinae. 304 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
: Price: $9.50, postpaid
No. 4. Matsuda, Ryuichi. 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head. 334 pages,
111 figures. Price: $9.50, postpaid
Sac ges we I MRR I a Sg SS Ft
aoe
Lic oc Hexagon
MOSQUITOES STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
V. MOSQUITOES ORIGINALLY DESCRIBED FROM
MIDDLE AMERICA?
By
John N. Belkin, Robert X. Schick and Sandra J. Hen emeant
INTRODUCTION
For the project on the ''Mosquitoes of Middle America" (Belkin, Schick et
al 1965) an effort is being made to obtain adequate reared material with all the
stages associated of all the nominal species of mosquitoes originally described
from all the countries covered by the project. To facilitate collecting by co-
operators, the present paper has been prepared listing the species and locali-
ties together with all the available data about the source of the original type
material. The countries or islands are arranged in an alphabetical order and
for each there is a List of Species followed by a List of Localities.
The List of Species consists of all the nominal species, valid or currently
considered as synonyms, arranged in the sequence followed in "'A synoptic
catalog of the mosquitoes of the world" (Stone, Knight and Starcke 1959; Stone
1961, 1963). For subspecies and junior synonyms, the species or senior syn-
onyms in the taxonomic treatment of the catalog are shown in [brackets]. A
nominal species marked with an asterisk (*) is the type species of a generic
group taxon. |
Under TYPE, all the available data pertaining to the type material are
given as derived from the original description and other published sources.
Type specimens were not examined in the preparation of this paper and there-
fore in many instances the kind of type specimen(s) (holotype or syntypes) could
not be determined; possibly some lectotype selections were missed. The num-
ber in parentheses following the sex or stage of the type(s) indicates the col-
lection or rearing number. In the statement of the type locality [brackets] are
! This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service Re-
search Grant AI-04379, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, and in part by U..S. Army Medical Research and Development Com-
mand, Department of the Army, under Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-
2478.
Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Califor-
nia 90024.
2 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. vol, 1, no. 'd, 1965
used to inclose corrections and (parentheses) for major political divisions,
such as provinces or states. Dates of the type collection and collectors are
siven whenever they could be determined. At the end of the type data, enclosed
in parentheses, is an indication of the type depository, abbreviated as in the
catalog, together with references to lectotype selections or other published
statements regarding the types.
Under BIONOMICS, all the available data about the original collection are
given directly, first for the immature stages and then for the adults. Data en-
closed in [brackets] are supplied from other sources when none were given for
the original collection. Such data should be used only as a general guide for lo-
cating the probable breeding sites.
The List of Localities is arranged alphabetically by state, province or
other major political subdivision and within each of these, alphabetically by the
specific locality itself. The number preceding the nominal species refers to
the number assigned to it in the list of species.
The general plan is to obtain unequivocally associated immature stages and
sexes of every nominal species in the list. This can be done in either of two
ways, depending upon the stages encountered: (1) individual rearings of field-
collected immature stages, primarily larvae but sometimes pupae or eggs, or
(2) progeny rearings from field-collected females. For the collection, rearing
and preservation, the methods outlined by Belkin, Hogue et al (1965) should be
followed. An effort should be made to obtain for each nominal species at least
20 individual rearings or 9 progeny rearings and to preserve at least 20 whole
larvae, 20 whole pupae, 20 males and 20 females, and to mass rear and pre-
serve all the rest of the material that can be readily collected. |
Collections of immature stages should be made in the same type of breed-
ing site as that specified for the original collection but other breeding sites
should also be sampled. When the breeding site is not definitely known, the
suggested probable larval habitats should be thoroughly sampled as well as
similar habitats, e.g. all types of ground waters (lakes, ponds, swamps,
streams, pools, etc.) for species using a specific type of ground water, and
all type of containers (treeholes, leaf axils, flower bracts, etc.) for con-
tainer breeders. The list of breeding sites on the collection record form and
the accompanying discussions in Belkin, Hogue et al (1965) provide a general
guide to the various types of breeding sites and should be followed.
Whenever possible, collections should be made in the exact type localities.
In many instances, however, these may have been destroyed through urbani-
zation, industrialization, road building, water empoundments and similar ac-
tivities or may no longer be accessible. In such instances, an effort should be
made to collect in a habitat similar to the original one at a site as close as
possible to the original type locality, preferably in the same drainage system
and at the same elevation.
ANTIGUA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albipes Theobald, 1901; tarsimaculatus
Goeldi, 1905, new name [= albimanus]. TYPE: 0, 9, Antigua Island, W. R.
Forrest; also from Brazil, British Guiana and Jamaica (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in vegetation in sunlit permanent ground waters].
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 3
2. Uranotaenia apicalis Theobald, 1903. TYPE: 0, ¢, Antigua Island, Jan,
W. R. Forrest (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae reported from open swamps with
abundant aquatic vegetation, in Pistia as well as in emergent vegetation. Adults
commonly attracted to light traps].
3. Psorophora (Grabhamia) pygmaea (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: Adults, An-
tigua Island, Aug, W. R.. Forrest (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary
rain pools. Females readily attracted to light traps].
4. Psorophora (Grabhamia) antiguae (Giles, 1904) [= pygmaea]. TYPE: 9,
Antigua Island (BM). BIONOMICS: [As for pygmaea above].
5. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) niger (Giles, 1904) [= taeniorhynchus]. TYPE: 9,
Antigua Island, 21 July 1901, W. R. Forrest (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae pri-
marily in ground pools in salt marshes, occasionally in freshwater pools near-
by. Females bite during day and night and are attracted to light traps].
List of Localities
All species from Antigua Island are from unspecified localities.
BAHAMA ISLANDS
List of Species
1. Wyeomyia (W.) bahama Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype ?, Tarpon
Bay [Tarpum Bay], Eleuthera Island, 7 July 1903, T. H. Coffin (USNM, 9990).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of bromeliads].
2. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) coffini (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= johnstonii].
TYPE: Holotype $, Nassau, New Providence Island, 22 June 1903, T. H. Cof-
fin (USNM, 9960). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shallow, temporary, shaded, rain-
filled depressions. Females bite any time during day in shade and in the open].
3. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) condolescens Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype
@ (10), Nassau, New Providence Island, 24 June 1903, T. H. Coffin (USNM,
10248). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary rain pools].
4. Aedes (O.) obturbator Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype ?, Tarpon
Bay [Tarpum Bay], Eleuthera Island, 7 July 1903, T. H. Coffin (USNM, 10141).
BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in shaded temporary pools]. Holotype captured
in woods.
5. Aedes (O.) plutocraticus Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= tortilis]. TYPE: Holo-
type ¢ (10), Nassau, New Providence Island, 21 June 1903, T. H. Coffin (USNM,
10251). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary ground pools].
6. Culex (C.) bahamensis Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larva, Ba-
hama Islands, date not specified, T. H. Coffin (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 43). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary and permanent ground
pools, in mangrove swamps and rockholes along seashore].
*7. Culex (C.) eleuthera Dyar, 1918 [= bahamensis]. TYPE: Lectotype &
(19), Governor's Harbour, Eleuthera Island, 6 July 1903, T. H. Coffin (USNM,
21570; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: [See above under
bahamensis]. 7
8. Culex (C.) aseyehae Dyar & Knab, 1915 [= pipiens quinquefasciatus ].
TYPE: Lectotype &, genitalia on slide (748), New Providence Island, 1915,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 19978; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 43). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in water in coral rockhole outside of town, in association with
4 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
Culex similis and C. sphinx.
9. Culex (C.) scimitar Branch & Seabrook, 1959. TYPE: Holotype ?, Hog
Island, Oct 1958, E. L. Seabrook and F. W. Hardin (USNM). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in crabholes and ground pools among fallen cattails and palm fronds on
perimeter of a Swamp.
10. Culex (C.) sphinx Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913. TYPE: Lectotype ¢
(142) with genitalia on slide (394), Nassau, New Providence Island, 2 July 1903,
T. H. Coffin (USNM, 12195; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in natural shallow pools in coral rocks.
_ List of Localities
BAHAMA ISLANDS (Locality not specified)
Probably near Nassau, New Providence Island: 6. Culex (C.) bahamensis.
ELEUTHERA ISLAND
Governor's Harbour: 7. Culex (C.) eleuthera.
Tarpum Bay: 1. Wyeomyia (W.) bahama; 4. Aedes (O.) obturbator.
HOG ISLAND
Locality not specified: 9. ules (C.) scimitar.
NEW PROVIDENCE ISLAND
Locality not specified, near Nassau: 8. Culex (C.) aseyehae.
Nassau: 2. Psorophora JJ.) coffini; 3. Aedes Aedes (O.) condolescens ) condolescens; 5. Aedes
(O.) plutocraticus; 10. Culex (C.) sphinx.
BARBADOS
List of Species
1. Culex (C.) palus Theobald, 1903 [= nigripalpus]|. TYPE: o%, Barbados,
June, G. C. Low; also ? from St. Vincent (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a
swamp.
2. Culex (C.) caraibeus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE:
Lectotype ? (59), Barbados Island, 15 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 12207; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45). BIONOMICS: Larvae in an open pool in
coral rock.
BRITISH GUIANA
List of Species
*1. Anopheles (Stethomyia) nimbus (Theobald, 1902). TYPE: 0, 9, Cabaca-
buri, Pomeroon River (Essequibo), G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in deeply shaded stream bed pools].
2. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albipes Theobald, 1901; tarsimaculatus Go-
eldi, 1905, new name [= albimanus]. TYPE: c, 9, British Guiana, date not
specified, E. D. Rowland; also from Antigua, Brazil and Jamaica (BM). BI-
ONOMICS: | Larvae in vegetation in sunlit permanent ground waters].
*3. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) frontosum (Theobald, 1903). TYPE:
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 3)
Holotype ?, Barima River, Pomeroon Mission (Essequibo), Aug, G. C. Low
(BM). BIONOMICS: [Predaceous larvae in leaf axils of bromeliads]. Type fe-
males collected on a river bank in virgin forest, about 70 miles from the coast.
4. Wyeomyia (W.) bodkini Edwards, 1922 [= aphobema]. TYPE: 0, ¢, Is-
sororo, N. W. District (Essequibo), Sept 1921, G. E. Bodkin (BM). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in a pineapple plant. ,
5. Wyeomyia (W.) quasiluteoventralis (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: 9, Moran-
hanna |Morawhanna|, Barima River (Essequibo) and Demerara River (Demera-
ra), date not specified, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
leaf axils of bromeliads, epiphytic and/or terrestrial].
6. Wyeomyia (Antunesmyia) flavifacies Edwards, 1922. TYPE: Holotype 2,
Aruka River (Essequibo), 16 Sept 1921, G. E. Bodkin (BM). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in leaf axils of bromeliads.
7. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) moerbista (Dyar & Knab, 1919). TYPE: Holo-
type @, Rupununi River (Essequibo), date not specified, K. S. Wise (USNM,
21995). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in bamboo or treeholes, possibly in
leaf axils].
8. Wyeomyia (D.) ulocoma (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: 4, Demerara River
(Demerara), date not specified, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: | Larvae prob-
ably in Heliconia inflorescences]. Type series collected in forest at 12 noon
in subdued light.
9. Limatus asulleptus (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: ¢, Demerara River (De-
merara), date not specified, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in broken bamboo, plant containers on ground, artificial containers and possi-
bly treeholes]. Type series collected in forest at 12 noon in subdued light.
10. Sabethes (S.) schausi Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= belisarioi]|. TYPE: Holo-
type , Omai (Essequibo), date not specified, W. Schaus (USNM, 11973). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo].
11. Sabethes (S.) chroiopus Dyar & Knab, 1913 [=bipartipes]. TYPE: Hol-
otype o, Potaro Highlands (Essequibo), May 1909, de Freitas (USNM, 15999).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo].
12. Mansonia (M.) humeralis Dyar & Knab, 1916. TYPE: Holotype 2,
Georgetown (Demerara), Dec 1915, H. W. B. Moore (USNM, 20366). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably attached to Pistia].
13. Uranotaenia leucoptera (Theobald, 1907). TYPE: Holotype 0, Stanley
Town, New Amsterdam (Berbice), Aug, E. D. Rowland (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably at extreme edges of extensive freshwater marshes].
14. Uranotaenia minuta Theobald, 1907 [= lowii]. TYPE: Holotype 2, New
Amsterdam (Berbice), Jan, E. D. Rowland (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in large lowland swamps or in other sunlit ground waters with some aqua-
tic vegetation. Adults probably attracted to light traps]. |
- *15. Uranotaenia rowlandii (Theobald, 1905)[= nataliae]. TYPE: 0, ¢, Stan-
ley Town, New Amsterdam (Berbice), date and collector not specified (BM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in large open swamps with abundant aquatic
vegetation such as Pistia and sedges].
*16. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) serratus (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: o%, 2 (61),
New Amsterdam, Feb, E. D. Rowland; also Brazil and Trinidad (BM). BIO-
NOMICS: | Larvae in temporary ground pools and flooded edges of forested
swamps].
17. Aedes (O.) nubilus (Theobald, 1903) [= serratus]. TYPE: 5¢, Pome-
roon Mission (Essequibo) and Christianburg River (Demerara), date not spe-
cified, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae as for serratus above]. Type
6 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
series collected in the bush.
18. Aedes (Stegomyia) luciensis (Theobald, 1901) [= aegypti]. TYPE: <, 9,
Georgetown (Demerara), 16 June 1899, J. J. Quelch; also St. Lucia (BM). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in domestic artificial containers].
*19. Haemagogus (Stegoconops) albomaculatus Theobald, 1903. TYPE: Holo-
type ?, Cara Cara [Kara-Kara], Demerara River (Demerara) and Pomeroon
River (Essequibo), date not specified, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in treeholes or bamboo].
20. Culex (C.) lateropunctata Theobald, 1907 [= mollis]. TYPE: Holotype
?, Supenaam River (Essequibo), Oct, E. D. Rowland (BM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in rockholes, treeholes or swamps].
21. Culex (C.) microannulata (Theobald, 1907) [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Hol-
otype o, Stanley Town, New Amsterdam (Berbice), July, E. D. Rowland (BM).
BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in various types of permanent ground waters].
22. Culex (Melanoconion) aikenii (Aiken & Rowland, 1906). TYPE: Larvae,
New Amsterdam (Berbice), date and collector not specified (LU). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in swamps and stream margins].
*23. Culex (Mel.) inornatus (Theobald, 1905) [= aikenii]. TYPE: 2, New
Amsterdam (Berbice), date and collector not specified (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae as under aikenii above].
24. Culex (Mel.) ocossa Dyar & Knab, 1919 [= aikenii]. TYPE: Lectotype
o (14) with genitalia slide, Georgetown (Demerara), Mar 1910, H. W. B.
Moore (USNM, 21705; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 54). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae as under aikenii above].
*25. Culex (Mel.) epirus Aiken, 1909. TYPE: 2, Corentyne River [Couran-
tyne River] (Berbice), date and collector not specified (LU). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in permanent ground waters].
26. Culex (Mel.) moorei Dyar, 1918 |= erraticus|]. TYPE: Lectotype & (19)
with genitalia slide (571), Plantation Plaisance, Georgetown (Demerara), 10
Apr 1910, H. W. B. Moore (USNM, 21573; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a:
53). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ditch.
List of Localities
BERBICE
Courantyne River: 25. Culex (Mel. ) epirus.
New Amsterdam: 14. Uranotaenia minuta; 16. Aedes (O.) serratus; 22.
Culex (Mel.) aikenii; 23. Culex (Mel.) inornatus. |
New Amsterdam, Stanley Town: 13. Uranotaenia leucoptera; 15. Urano-
taenia rowlandii; 21. Culex (C.) microannulata.
BRITISH GUIANA (Locality not specified)
Probably near Georgetown: 2. Anopheles (N.) albipes.
DEMERARA
Christianburg River: 17. Aedes (O.) nubilus.
Demerara River: 5. Wyeomyia (W.) quasiluteoventralis; 8. Wyeomyia (D.)
ulocoma; 9. Limatus asulleptus; 19. Haemagogus (S.) albomaculatus (Kara-
Kara).
Georgetown: 12. Mansonia humeralis; 18. Aedes (S.) luciensis; 24. Culex
(Mel. ) ocossa; 26. Culex (Mel.) moorei (Plantation Plaisance). :
Belkin et al: .Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes t
ESSEQUIBO
Aruka River: 6. Wyeomyia (A.) flavifacies.
Barima River, Morawhanna: 5. Wyeomyia (w. ) quasiluteoventralis.
Barima River, Pomeroon Mission: 3. Trichoprosopon (R.) frontosum; 17.
Aedes (O. ) wba
Issororo: 4. Wyeomyia (W.) bodkini.
Omai: 10. Sabethes 1S) schausi.
Pomeroon River: 19. Haemagogus (S.) albomaculatus.
Pomeroon River, Cabacaburi: 1. Anopheles (S.) nimbus.
Potaro Highlands: 11. Sabethes (S.) chroiopus.
Rupununi River: 7. Wyeomyia (D.) moerbista.
Supenaam River: 20. Culex (C.) lateropunctata.
BRITISH HONDURAS
List of Species
1. Uranotaenia bicolor Martini, 1935; martinii Lane, 1943, new name [=
hystera]. TYPE: Holotype 9, 5 km south of Rio Cacao (Orange Walk), 16 Oct
1925, A. Dampf (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in swamps, stream
margins or other permanent ground waters]. Holotype collected in virgin for-
est.
2. Uranotaenia modesta Martini, 1935 [= pulcherrima]. TYPE: Holotype
?, 5 km south of Rio Cacao (Orange Walk), 16 Oct 1925, A. Dampf (LU). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in swamps, stream margins or other permanent
ground waters]. Holotype collected in virgin forest.
3. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) pix Martini, 1935. TYPE: Lectotype ?, Belice
[Belize] [6-7 Sept 1925], A. Dampf (USNM: selection of Stone and Knight 1956a:
224). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary ground pools].
List of Localities
BELIZE, Belize: 3. Aedes (O. ) pix.
ORANGE WALK: 5 km south of Rio Cacao; locality not shown on any map;
stated to be in the interior of British Honduras; from dates of other collections
made by Dampf and reported by Martini, Rio Cacao would appear to be located
near Blue Creek and La Boca on the way south to Yalbac and Cayo: 1. Urano-
taenia bicolor; 2. Uranotaenia modesta.
COLOMBIA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (A.) bifoliata Osorno-Mesa & Mufioz-Sarmiento, 1948 [var.
of pseudopunctipennis]. TYPE: Holotype “, larval skin and egg shell, Florida,
near Cali (Valle), elev. 1006 m, Sept 1947, S. Renjifo-Salcedo (DMB). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in drying round pools]. Holotype bred from female
collected in building.
2. Anopheles (Kerteszia) bambusicolus Komp, 1937. TYPE: Lectotype @,
La Union (Meta), Sept 1935, J. Boshell-Manrique (USNM; selection of Stone
8 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
and Knight 1956b: 276). BIONOMICS: Larvae in unbroken bamboo internodes.
3. Anopheles (K.) homunculus Komp, 1937. TYPE: Lectotype “ with asso-
ciated larval skin (3) and genitalia slide, Restrepo (Meta), 9 Sept 1935, W. H.
W. Komp (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 278). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in bromeliad leaf axils. |
4. Anopheles (K.) anoplus Komp, 1937 [= homunculus]. TYPE: Holotype °
with associated larval skin and genitalia slide, Restrepo (Meta), Dec 1936,
E. Osorno-Mesa (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliad leaf axils.
5. Anopheles (Lophopodomyia) oiketorakras Osorno-Mesa, 1947. TYPE:
Lectotype o, Rio San Francisco, in the canyon between Monserrate and Guade-
lupe Mts, elev. 2700-2840 m, east of Bogota (Cundinamarca), 13 Mar 1946,
E. Osorno-Mesa (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 279. BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in shaded "'river holes’’ with organic debris and surrounded by
vegetation.
*§. Anopheles (L.) squamifemur Antunes, 1937. TYPE: Holotype , ''vere-
da’ Vega Grande, Restrepo (Meta), 29 Mar 1935, P. C. A. Antunes (IOC,
2298). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in shaded stream bed pools]. Adults
captured at the border of the forest with animal bait, 1830-1930 hrs.
7. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) evansae Antunes in Lane and Cerqueira,
1942. TYPE: Holotype , El Caibe, Restrepo (Meta), Dec 1934, P.C. A. An-
tunes (IOC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bamboo or treeholes, possibly
predaceous]. :
8. Trichoprosopon (R.) lanei (Antunes, 1937). TYPE: Holotype 0, Caney,
Restrepo (Meta), 7 Feb 1935, P. C. A. Antunes (IOC, 2299). BIONOMICS:
Pupa collected in bamboo joint in forest.
9. Wyeomyia (W.) camptocomma Dyar, 1924 [= scotinomus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o with genitalia slide (1903), Barranquilla (Magdalena), 1923, L. H.
Dunn (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 121). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in leaf axils of elephant's ear plants, Calladium (?). :
10. Wyeomyia (Antunesmyia) colombiana Lane, 1945. TYPE: Holotype 2,
Vega Grande, Restrepo (Meta), Mar 1935, P. C. A. Antunes (FH, 4040).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliad leaf axils].
11. Psorophora (P.) cyanopennis (Humboldt, 1819) [= ciliata]. TYPE:
Adult(s), Magdalena River close to Tenerife (Magdalena), date not specified,
F. H. A. Humboldt (LU). BIONOMICS: [Predaceous larvae in temporary
ground pools. Females diurnal biters].
12. Psorophora (P.) lineata (Humboldt, 1819). TYPE: Adult(s), Magdalena
River (Magdalena), date not specified, F. H. A. Humboldt (LU). BIONOMICS:
[Predaceous larvae in large temporary ground pools with grassy vegetation,
possibly also in forested areas. Females are diurnal biters in the shade and
may be attracted to lights]. i
13. Psorophora (Grabhamia) funiculus Dyar, 1920 [= confinnis]. TYPE:
Lectotype 0, Rio Frio (Magdalena), 3-5 Mar 1913, J. H. Egbert (USNM; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1955: 284). BIONOMICS: | Larvae in open temporary
gsround pools of all types, especially hoofprints, road ruts and irrigation over-
flows. Females are diurnal and nocturnal biters and are attracted to lights].
14. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) euiris Dyar, 1922. TYPE: Lectotype 9, Bogota
(Cundinamarca), 28 Feb 1922, F. A. Miller (USNM, 25763; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957c: 201). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in rockholes, stream
bed pools or other types of temporary ground pools].
15. Aedes (O.) milleri Dyar, 1922. TYPE: Holotype?, Bogota (Cundina-
marca), 28 Feb 1922, F. A. Miller (USNM, 25764). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 9
have been collected in shaded stream bed pools with organic debris and sur-
rounded by vegetation, in association with Anopheles (S.) oiketorakras].
16. Aedes (Finlaya) scutellalbum Boshell-Manrique, 1939. TYPE: Holotype
o, Rio Upin, Restrepo (Meta), elev. 500 m, July 1938, J. Boshell-Manrique
(USNM). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in rockpool in Rio Upin.
17. Aedes (Soperia) pseudodominicii Komp, 1936 [= dominicii]. TYPE: Syn-
types o, Restrepo (Meta), Aug-Sept 1935, E. Osorno-Mesa (NE). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of bromeliads]. Syntypes taken by netting.
18. Aedes (S.) whitmorei Dunn, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype , near emerald
mines, Muzo (Santander), 1916, E. R. Whitmore (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1956a: 226). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads or treeholes
not in "small heavily shaded pool of clear but apparently stagnant water" as
stated by Dunn]. Adults captured in a hut occupied by mine guards.
19. Haemagogus (Stegoconops) andinus Osorno-Mesa, 1944. TYPE: Holo-
type o, coffee plantation near Fusagasuga (Cundinamarca), elev. 1746 m, May
1942, E. Osorno-Mesa (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in rotholes in ''guamos"
trees (Inga sp.).
20. Haemagogus (S.) falco Kumm, Osorno-Mesa & Boshell-Manrique, 1946
[ssp. of capricornii or spegazzinii |. TYPE: Syntypes o, 2, larvae, forest
known as Volcanes in the valley of the Pitas River near Caparrapi (Cundinamar-
ca), May and June 1943, H.W. Kumm, E. Osorno-Mesa and J. Boshell-Manri-
que (USNM; lectotype not selected, Stone and Knight 1955: 288). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in treeholes and bamboo traps].
21. Haemagogus (H.) boshelli Osorno-Mesa, 1944. TYPE: Holotype & with
genitalia slide, Bahia de Solano (Choc6), elev. 2-20 m, July 1942, E. Osorno-
Mesa (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes and coconut shells on the
ground. | :
22. Culex (C.) aglischrus Dyar, 1924 [= maracayensis]. TYPE: Lectotype
o (1904, B 2) with genitalia slide (1904), Barranquilla (Magdalena), 1923, L.H.
Dunn (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 42). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
a hole in the ground and a deep hole resembling a shallow well.
23. Culex (C.) scutatus Rozeboom & Komp, 1948. TYPE: Holotype o with
associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Villavicencio (Meta), 15
May 1947, L. E. Rozeboom (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae ina small muddy
footprint.
24. Culex (Melanoconion) batesi Rozeboom & Komp, 1948. TYPE: Holo-
type o with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Villavicen-
cio (Meta), 15 May 1947, L. E. Rozeboom (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
partly shaded, shallow margin of stream. :
25. Culex (Mel.) meroneus Dyar, 1925 [= conspirator]. TYPE: Holotype
o, Barranquilla (Magdalena), Nov-Dec 1924, L. H. Dunn (USNM). BIONO-
MICS: | Larvae probably in ground pools, stream margins or swamps].
26. Culex (Mel.) crybda Dyar, 1924. TYPE: Holotype o, on river steamer
on the Atrato River at Murindo (Antioquia), date not specified, L. H. Dunn
(USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in stream margins, swamps or ground
pools].- Holotype caught on river steamer between 2000 and 2200 hrs.
27. Culex (Mel. ) mistura Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype & with
associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Laguna de la Palmita,
Villavicencio (Meta), 12 May 1947, L. E. Rozeboom (USNM). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in grassy margin of an open, clear-water pond in pasture.
28. Culex (Mel.) sursumptor Dyar, 1924. TYPE: Lectotype o (1909) with
genitalia slide, Barranquilla (Magdalena), 1923, L. H. Dunn (USNM; selection
10 Contr. Amer. Ent: Inst,, vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: Larvae from a ground pool.
29. Culex (Mel.) ligator Dyar, 1924 [= SN ah TYPE: Lectotype
(1910) with genitalia slide, Barranquilla (Magdalena), 1923, L. H. Dunn (USNM;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a pool ina
stream bed that was nearly dry.
30. Culex (Mochlostyrax) colombiensis Dyar, 1924 [= pilosus]. TYPE: Hol-
otype &, on river steamer on the Atrato River at Murindo (Antioquia), date not
specified, L. H. Dunn (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent
or semi-permanent ground waters|. Holotype caught on river steamer between
2000 and 2200 hrs.
31. Culex (Microculex) elongatus Rozeboom & Komp, 1950. TYPE: Holo-
type & with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Acacias (Me-
ta), 3 June 1947, L. E. Rozeboom (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae from uncut
bamboo internodes perforated with holes bored by insects; associated with Cu-
lex (Aedinus) bamborum, Culex (Carrollia) wilsoni, Anopheles (Kerteszia) bam-
busicolus and Wreomyia (W.) oblita. [Adults not GolL lected in nature].
~ 32. Culex (Eubonnea) a) paraplesia Dyar, 1922 [= ets It TYPE: Hol-
otype &, Puerto Nifio on Rio Magdalena (Cundinamarca), 21 Feb 1922, F. A.
Miller (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ground pools with much
vegetation. No information on adults].
33. Culex (Aedinus) bamborum Rozeboom & Komp, 1948. TYPE: Holotype
o with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Acacias (Meta),
3 June 1947, L. E. Rozeboom (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae from uncut bam-
boo ele ae perforated by holes bored by insects. [Adults not collected in
nature}.
List of Localities
ANTIOQUIA
Rio Atrato at Murindo: 26. Culex (Mel.) crybda; 30. Culex (Mel.) colombi-
ensis.
CHOCO
Bahia de Solano: 21. Haemagogus (H.) boshelli.
CUNDINAMARCA
Bogota: 14. Aedes (O.) euiris; 15. Aedes (O.) milleri.
Bogota, Rio San Francisco: 5. Anopheles (L.) oiketorakras.
Caparrapi, Rio Pitas valley, Volcanes forest:. 20. Haemagogus (S.) falco.
Fusagasuga: 19. Haemagogus (S.) andinus.
Puerto Nifio on Rio Magdalena: 32. Culex (E.) paraplesia.
MAGDALENA :
Barranquilla: 9. Wyeomyia (W.) camptocomma; 22. Culex (C.) aglischrus;
25. Culex (Mel.) meroneus; 28. Culex (Mel.) sursumptor; 29. Culex (Mel. )
ligator. :
Frio (Rio): 13. Psorophora (G.) funiculus.
Magdalena (Rio): 12. Psorophora (P.) lineata.
Tenerife: 11. Psorophora (P.) cyanopennis.
META
Acacias: 31. Culex (Micr.) elongatus; 33. Culex (A.) bamborum.
La Union: 2. Anopheles (K.) bambusicolus.
Restrepo: 3. Anopheles (K.) homunculus; 4. Anopheles (K. ) anoplus;
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes i]
6. Anopheles (L.) squamifemur (Vega Grande); 7. Trichoprosopon (R.) evansae
(Caibe); 8. Trichoprosopon (R.) lanei (Caney); 10. Wyeomyia (A.) colombiana
(Vega Grande); 16. Aedes (F.) scutellalbum (Rio Upin); 17. Aedes (S.) pseudo-
dominicii.
Villavicencio: 23. Culex (C.) scutatus; 24. Culex (Mel.) batesi; 27. Culex
(Mel. ) mistura (Laguna dela Palmita).
SANTANDER
Muzo, emerald mines: 18. Aedes (S.) whitmorei.
VALLE
Cali, Florida: 1. Anopheles (A.) bifoliata.
COSTA RICA
List of Species
1. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) moctezuma (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= theo-
baldi]. TYPE: Holotype o (3380), pathway to Las Loras, Rio Aranjuez, near
Puntarenas (Puntarenas), 13 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9953; see Stone and
Knight 1957c: 199). BIONOMICS: Predaceous larvae in coconut husks, [prob-
ably also in treeholes and artificial containers]. Adults resting on low herbage
in a wooded area.
2. Trichoprosopon (Ctenogoeldia) homotina (Dyar & Knab, 1905) [= mag-
num]. TYPE: Holotype 2, Puerto Limon (Limon), 28 Sept 1905, F. Knab
(USNM, 9993; see Stone and Knight 1957b: 118). BIONOMICS: | Larvae in leaf
axils and flower bracts of Marantaceae (Calathea)]. Adults taken in daytime
flying in the forest.
3. Wyeomyia (W.) espartana Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= arthrostigma]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Esparta (Puntarenas), 18 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 10005). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in broken bamboo or treeholes|. Holotype taken
in deep, wooded ravine.
4. Wyeomyia (W.) gynaecopus Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= hemisagnosta]. TYPE:
Holotype 2, Esparta (Puntarenas), 18 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 11984). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or coconut shells]. Holotype taken in
deep, wooded ravine.
5. Wyeomyia (W.) adelpha Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= mitchellii]. TYPE: Lec-
totype 2, Esparta (Puntarenas), 18 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 10000; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf
axils of bromeliads]. Adults of the type series were taken in a deep, shaded
ravine, in the daytime, as they came to bite.
*§. Limatus methysticus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= asulleptus]. TYPE: Lecto-
type & with genitalia slide (368), Puerto Limon (Limon), 28 Sept 1905, F. Knab
(USNM, 12131; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 117). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in broken bamboo, plant containers on the ground, artificial con-
tainers and possibly treeholes].
7. Uranotaenia orthodoxa Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Holotype 2, Rio Tiribi (San
José), 29 May 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM, 24706). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in permanent ground waters].
8. Orthopodomyia fascipes (Coquillett, 1905). TYPE: Lectotype ¢ (338b),
pathway to Las Loras, Rio Aranjuez, near Puntarenas (Puntarenas), 13 Sept
1905, F. Knab (USNM, 8296; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 198).
12 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in treeholes|. Adults collected in crevice in the
trunk of a large tree.
9. Orthopodomyia kummi Edwards, 1939. TYPE: Holotype ?, Orosi (Carta-
go), June 1937, H. W. Kumm (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in abandoned tank or
cesspool full of clear rainwater; [also in treeholes].
10. Psorophora (P.) iracunda Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= cilipes]|. TYPE: Holo-
type 2 with associated larval and pupal skins, Las Loras near Puntarenas
(Puntarenas), Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9965; see Stone and Knight 1955:
285). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a large pond choked by vegetation in the forest.
11. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) angustivittatus Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holo-
type @, Puerto Limon (Limon), 28 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 10140; see
Stone and Knight 1956a: 214). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in small temporary ground
pools in full sunlight]. i
12. Aedes (O.) euplocamus Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: No syntype larval
material available at USNM, Zent (Limon), date not specified, F. Knab (NE;
see Stone and Knight 1956a: 217). BIONOMICS: Larvae collected in a ditch.
13. Aedes (O.) meridionalis Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= serratus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype larval skin (333b) with associated pupal skin and o, Las Loras, near
Puntarenas (Puntarenas), 8 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1956a: 221). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a pond chocked by vegetation which
is dry in the dry season.
14. Aedes (Finlaya) homoeopus Dyar, 1922 [= argyrothorax]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o, Alajuela (Alajuela), Oct 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM; selection of Stone
and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes].
15. Aedes (F.) perichares Dyar, 1921 [= atropalpus]. TYPE: Lectotype @,
Ciruelas (Alajuela), elev. 800 m, 29 Oct 1920, A. Alfaro (USNM, 23972; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIONOMICS: Larvae from rockholes.
16. Aedes (F.) heteropus Dyar, 1921 [= terrens]. TYPE: Lectotype & with
genitalia slide (1542), Alajuela (Alajuela), 1 July 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM, 24865;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo
joints.
17. Aedes (Howardina) allotecnon Kumm, Komp & Ruiz, 1940. TYPE: Lec-
totype & (156) with associated larval skin, Poas Volcano (Alajuela), elev. 9000
ft, 14 Apr 1938, H. W. Kumm (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 214).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in leaf axils of epiphytic bromeliads.
18. Haemagogus (Stegoconops) anastasionis Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype
o (1529) with genitalia slide, Puntarenas (Puntarenas), 15 July 1921, A. Al-
faro (USNM, 24864; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 287). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in treeholes in mangrove; also in artificial containers].
19. Haemagogus (S.) mesodentatus Komp & Kumm, 1938. TYPE: Holotype
co, Parque Bolivar, San José (San José), 20 Dec 1937, H.W. Kumm (LU; see
Stone and Knight 1955: 288). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treehole in park.
20. Haemagogus (H.) iridicolor Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype “ (1468)
with genitalia slide, Higuito, San Mateo (Alajuela), 26 May 1921, P. Schild
(USNM; selection of Komp 1955: 29, see also Stone and Knight 1955: 288). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in bamboo stubs]. :
21. Culex (C.) mortificator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= nigripalpus|]. TYPE: No
syntype larval material available at USNM, Zent Hon): 26 Sept 1905, F.
Knab (NE; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 53). BIONOMICS: Larvae in hollow in
stump of a banana containing a dark brown liquid.
22. Culex (Melanoconion) alfaroi Dyar, 1921 [= bastagarius|]. TYPE: Hol-
otype in bad condition, with genitalia slide, Atirro (Cartago), elev. 600 m,
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 13
24 Oct 1920, A. Alfaro (USNM, 23938). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
grassy margins of streams]. 3 7
23. Culex (Mel. ) holoneus Dyar, 1921 [= conspirator]. TYPE: Holotype ©,
Orotina (Alajuela), elev. 300 m, 17 Oct 1920, A. Alfaro (USNM, 23939). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in various types of permanent ground waters].
24. Culex (Mel. ) pasadaemon Dyar, 1921 [= conspirator]. TYPE: Holo-
type o, San José (San Jose), 5 Jan 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM, 24083). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in various types of permanent ground waters].
25. Culex (Mel.) merodaemon Dyar, 1921 [= conspirator]. TYPE: Holo-
type o with genitalia slide (1391), Orotina (Alajuela), 20 Dec 1920, A. Alfaro
(USNM, 24082; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 53). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in various types of permanent ground waters].
26. Culex (Mel.) educator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Syntype larvae (337)
all in poor condition, Rio Aranjuez near Puntarenas (Puntarenas), 12 Sept 1905,
F. Knab (USNM; no lectotype selected by Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in reeds at the edge of an old stream bed disconnected from the
stream.
27. Culex (Mel.) elevator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larval skin
with head capsule missing (355a) associated with pupal skin and adult female, 2
miles west of Puerto Limon (Limon), 30 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a pool of clear spring
water containing vegetable debris at the head of a small stream.
28. Culex (Mel.) limacifer Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype © genitalia only
(adult male lost), Chase (Limon), Feb 1928, W. H. W. Komp (USNM). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in various types of permanent ground pools].
*29. Culex (Mel.) trifidus Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype & with genitalia
slide (1436), Rio Tiribi (San José), 7 Jan 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM; selection of
Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 97; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 57). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
*30. Culex (Aedinus) latisquama (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype o
(344c), Puerto Limon (Limon), 25 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 8298; selection
of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 92; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in crabholes along the seashore. Adults rest in the upper parts of the
crabholes. ,
31. Culex (Carrollia) metempsytus Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype “, Ala-
juela (Alajuela), 4 July 1921, A. Alfaro (USNM, 24863; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 53). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes, bamboo or
plant parts on the ground].
*32. Deinocerites epitedeus (Knab, 1907). TYPE: Lectotype “ (344a) with
genitalia slide (286), Puerto Limon (Limon), 30 Sept 1905, F. Knab (USNM,
10291; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crab-
holes on side of a hill beyond the reach of tide water, the contained water being
fresh, furnished by a small rivulet. The water surface was at a depth of sev-
eral feet below the orifices of the holes. The adults rest in the upper parts of
holes.
33. Dixella shannoni (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype &%, Higuito, San Mateo
(Alajuela), date not specified, P. Schild (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in vegetation in stream margins or in other permanent ground waters].
List of Localities
ALAJUELA
Alajuela: 14. Aedes (F.) homoeopus; 16. Aedes (F.) heteropus; 31. Culex
14. Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
(Carrol. ) metempsytus.
Ciruelas: 15. Aedes (F.) perichares.
Higuito, San Mateo: 20. Haemagogus (H.) iridicolor; 33. Dixella shannoni.
Orotina: 23. Culex (Mel.) holoneus; 25. Culex (Mel. ) merodaemon.
Poas Volcano, elev. 9000 ft: 17. Aedes (H.) allotecnon.
CARTAGO
Atirro: 22. Culex (Mel.) alfaroi.
Orosi: 9. Orthopodomyia kummi.
LIMON
Chase: 28. Culex (Mel. ) limacifer.
Puerto Limon: 2. Trichoprosopon (C.) homotina; 6. Limatus methysticus;
11. Culex (.) angustivittatus; 27. Culex (Mel.) elevator (2 m west); 30. Culex
(A.) latisquama; 32. Deinocerites epitedeus.
Zent: 12. Aedes (O.) euplocamus; 21. Culex (C.) mortificator.
PUNTARENAS
Aranjuez (Rio), near Puntarenas, pathway to Las Loras: 1. Toxorhynchites
(L.) moctezuma; 8. Orthopodomyia fascipes; 26. Culex (Mel.) educator.
Esparta: 3. Wyeomyia (W.) espartana; 4. Wyeomyia (W.) gynaecopus; 5.
Wyeomyia (W.) adelpha.
Las Loras (west of Aeanies: 10. Psorophora (P.) iracunda; 13. Aedes (.)
meridionalis.
Puntarenas: 18. Haemagogus (S. ) anastasionis.
SAN JOSE
San Jose: 19. Haemagogus (S.) mesodentatus (Parque Bolivar); 24. Culex
(Mel. ) pasadaemon.
Rio Tiribi: 7. Uranotaenia orthodoxa; 29. Culex (Mel. ) trifidus.
CUBA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) cubensis Agramonte, 1900 [= albimanus].
TYPE: o, 9, several localities (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in sunlit, perma-
nent ground waters].
2. Wyeomyia (W.) minor Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= bahama]. TYPE: Holotype
°, Baracoa (Oriente), Sept 1901, A. Hesck (USNM, 9992; see Stone and Knight
1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of bromeliads].
3. Wyeomyia (W.) violescens Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= mitchellii]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Cayamas (Oriente), 8 June 1906, E. A. Schwarz (USNM, 9991;
see Stone and Knight 1957b: 126). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils
of bromeliads]. Holotype caught in home as it came to bite.
4. Wyeomyia (W.) argyrura Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= vanduzeei|]. TYPE: Hol-
otype 9, San Antonio de los Banos (La Habana), date not specified, J. H. Pazos
(USNM, 12009). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of bromeliads].
5. Wyeomyia (W.) conchita Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= vanduzeei]. TYPE: Lec-
totype ? (397), San Antonio de los Bafios (La Habana), date not specified, J. H.
Pazos (USNM, 12180; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in leaf axils of Tillandsia.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 15
6. Mansonia (Rhynchotaenia) persephassa (Dyar & Knab, 1909) [= nigri-
cans|. TYPE: Holotype ?, San Antonio de los Bafios (La Habana), date not spe-
cified, J. H. Pazos (USNM, 12118). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably on rootlets
of sedges and grasses in mud in shallow water along edges of swamps or
streams].
7. Uranotaenia oteizai Perez Vigueras, 1956. TYPE: o, &, Guanihees
(La Habana), no data available (LU). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in perma-
nent ground waters].
8. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) pazosi (Pazos, 1908) [= ferox]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Vuelta Abajo (Las Villas), date not specified, J. H. Pazos (NE).
BIONOMICS: | Larvae a sein in temporary pools in wooded areas].
9. Psorophora (J.) schwarzi Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= johnstonii]. TYPE:
Holotype , Cayamas (Oriente), 7 May 1906, E. A. Schwarz (USNM, 9970). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in shaded temporary ground pools].
10. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) indolescens Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= scapularis].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Cayamas (Oriente), 8 May 1906, E. A. Schwarz (USNM,
10249; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
shaded temporary ground pools in wooded areas]. Holotype taken in woods.
11. Aedes (O.) bracteatus (Coquillett, 1906) [= tortilis]. TYPE: Holotype
°, La Habana (La Habana), 1 Nov 1902, J. R. Taylor (USNM, 7753; see Stone
and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in various types of
temporary ground pools].
12. Aedes (O.) habanicus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= tortilis]. TYPE: Lecto-
type fragments of.a larval skin on slide, La Habana (La Habana), 28 Oct 1903,
J. R. Taylor (USNM; selection of Stare and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS:
Associated with Psorophora (P.) larvae, [probably in various types of tempo-
rary ground pools}.
13. Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827) [= aegypti].
TYPE: o&%, "Habitat in ins. Cuba," probably La Habana, Poey (NE). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae in domestic artificial containers].
14. Culex (C.) finlayi Perez Vigueras, 1956. TYPE: o, ¢, Casiguas,
Barrio de Jaruco (La Habana), no data available (LU). BIONOMICS: [ Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters].
15. Culex (C.) prasinopleurus Martini, 1914 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o, near Santiago de Cuba (Oriente), Nov 1913, E. Martini and J. M.
Espini (BM; selection of Mattingly 1955: 31). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in
crabholes|. Type series collected in crabholes.
16. Culex (C.) cubensis Bigot, 1856 [= pipiens quinquefasciatus]. TYPE: 9,
Cuba, from Guerin-Meneville collection (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in foul ground pools or artificial containers].
17. Culex (Melanoconion) falsificator Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= atratus]. TYPE:
Lectotype & (408) with genitalia slide, La Habana (La Habana), 15 Feb 1904,
J. R. Taylor (USNM, 12108; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 49-50). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae pr obably in mangrove swamps].
18. Culex (Mel.) invocator Pazos, 1908 |= erraticus]. TYPE: Lectotype “
(337) with genitalia slide, San Antonio de los Baftos (La Habana), J. H. Pazos
(USNM, 12110; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
probably in permanent fresh ground waters].
19. Culex (Mochlosytrax) cubensis (Dyar & Knab, 1906); agitator Dyar &
Knab, 1907, new name = pilosus|. TYPE: Syntype larvae, La Habana (La Ha-
bana), 1 Nov 1902, J. R. Taylor (USNM; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent, semi-permanent or temporary
16 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
ground waters].
20. Culex (Mochl.) ignobilis Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= pilosus]. TYPE: Lecto-
type (648) with hindleg on slide (407), San Antonio de los Bafios (La Habana),
date not specified, J. H. Pazos (USNM, 12239; selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 51). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent, semi-permanent or
temporary ground waters].
21. Culex (Mochl.) mastigia Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= pilosus|. TYPE:
Lectotype % (793) with genitalia slide (499), San Antonio de los Bafios (La Ha-
bana), date not specified, J. H. Pazos (USNM, 12679; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 53). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent, semi-perma-
nent or temporary ground waters].
22. Culex (Aedinus) antillummagnorum Dyar, 1928 [= americanus]. TYPE:
Lectotype & (416) with genitalia slide (785), San Antonio de los Baftios (La Haba-
na), date not specified, J. H. Pazos (USNM, 40778; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 43). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in leaf axils of bromeliads].
23. Sayomyia antillum (Knab, 1913). TYPE: Holotype o, San Antonio de los
Banos (La Habana), date not specified, J. H. Pazos (USNM, 16253). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in ponds, lakes or swamps].
List of Localities
CUBA (Locality not specified)
Probably in or near La Habana: 1. Anopheles (N.) cubensis; 13. Aedes (S.)
mosquito; 16. Culex (C.) cubensis.
LA HABANA
Casiguas (Barrio de Jaruco): 14. Culex (C.) finlayi.
Guanimar: 7. Uranotaenia oteizai.
La Habana: 11. Aedes Aedes (O.) bracteatus ) bracteatus; 12. Aedes (O.) habanicus; 17. Culex
(Mel. ) falsificator; 19. Culex (Mochl.) cubensis. —
San Antonio de los Banos: 4. Wyeomyia (W.) argyrura; 5. Wyeomyia (W.)
conchita; 6. Mansonia (R.) persephassa; 18. Culex (Mel.) invocator; 20. Culex
(Mochl. (Mochi. ) ignobilis; 21. Culex (Mochl.) mastigia; 22. Culex (A.) antillammaee
norum; 23. Sayomyia antillum.
LAS VILLAS
Vuelta Abajo: 8. Psorophora (J.) pazosi.
ORIENTE
Baracoa: 2. Wyeomyia (W.) minor.
Cayamas: 3. Wyeomyia (W.) violescens; 9. Psorophora (J.) schwarzi; 10.
Aedes (O.) indolescens.
Santiago de Cuba: 15. Culex (C.) prasinopleurus.
DOMINICA
List of Species
1. Wyeomyia (W.) abia Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= medioalbipes]|. TYPE: Lec-
totype (4-2), Dominica, date not specified, F. E. Campbell (USNM, 11988;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
leaf axils of bromeliads].
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 17
2. Aedes (Howardina) busckii (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype 0, cacao
plantation, San Domingo [Dominica], 28 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9139; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: Larvae in cacao pods
(with vindicator). :
3. Culex (C.) dictator Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= declarator]. TYPE: Lectotype
o& (75.1) with larval skin and genitalia slide, Dominica, 28 July 1905, A. Busck
(USNM, 12099; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 47). BIONOMICS: Larvae
of type series collected in abandoned prospect hole, 30 ft deep, with clear sul-
phurous water (rockhole). |
4. Culex (C.) vindicator Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= declarator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type & (74.25) with larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide (776), Dominica,
28 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 12098; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 58).
BIONOMICS: Larvae of type series collected in ill-smelling, thick water in ca-
cao husks in a cacao plantation.
List of Localities
Type localities were not specified for any of the species.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
List of Species
1. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albimanus Wiedemann, 1821. TYPE: @, Ins.
St. Domingo, no other data (NMW). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in sunlit, permanent
ground waters].
2. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) haitiensis (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= portori-
censis|. TYPE: Holotype 2 (134.1), San Francisco Mts, Sept 1905, A. Busck
(USNM, 9955; see Stone and Knight. 1957c: 199). BIONOMICS: Type from larva
in "hollow tree," others of type series from "hollow palm trunk" (123.1), hol-
low immortelle tree (139.1), hollow tree (144.1, 144.2).
3. Wyeomyia (W.) glaucocephala Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= mitchellii]. TYPE:
Holotype ? (113, head missing), near Santo Domingo City, 17 Aug 1905, A.
Busck (USNM, 9999; see Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
epiphytic bromeliad and leaf axil of young palm.
4. Wyeomyia (W.) ochrura Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= mitchellii]. TYPE: Lec-
totype larval skin (113.1) with associated pupal skin, pinned ~ and genitalia
slide (364), near Santo Domingo City, 17 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9987;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 124-125). BIONOMICS: Larvae in axils of
young palm.
5. Wyeomyia (W.) sororcula Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= vanduzeei]. TYPE: Hol-
otype 2, San Francisco Mts, 29 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9996; see Stone
and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
6. Sabethes (S.) bipartipes Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype ¢, near
Santo Domingo City, Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9980; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957b: 117-118). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bam-
boo}.
i Psorophora (Grabhamia) infine (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= cingulata]. TYPE:
Lectotype o& (103.1) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide
(192), near Santo Domingo City, Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone
and Knight 1955: 285). BIONOMICS: Larvae in pothole near coast, water quite
Salty.
18 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
8. Psorophora (G.) insularia (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE: Holotype ¢
(108.1) with associated larval and pupal skins, near Santo Domingo City, 11
July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9975; see Stone and Knight 1955: 285. BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in pools in coral limestone sprayed by high waves but not sub-
merged except at extreme high tide.
9. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) balteatus Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= tortilis]|. TYPE:
Holotype 2, near Santo Domingo City, Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 10142; see
Stone and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary
ground pools].
*10. Aedes (Finlaya) mediovittatus (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Holotype ?
(99.4) with associated larval and pupal skins, near~Santo Domingo City, Aug
1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9138; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 221). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in pothole in coral rock on road.
11. Aedes (Howardina) albonotatus (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype ¢
(141.3) with associated larval and pupal skins, San Francisco Mts, 3 Sept 1905,
A. Busck (USNM, 8297; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 213). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in bamboo stalk way out on mountain.
12. Culex (C.) duplicator Dyar & Knab, 1909. TYPE: Lectotype “, San
Francisco Mts, Sept 1906, A. Busck (USNM, 12111; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae in pond in woods frequented by pigs.
*13. Culex (C.) habilitator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larval
skin (102.2) with associated pupal skin, o” and genitalia slide (409), near Santo
Domingo City, 10 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 50). BIONOMICS: Larvae in small pool in cave in coral cliffs near
coast.
14. Culex (C.) eremita Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= habilitator|. TYPE:
Lectotype & (94.7) with genitalia slide (398), near Santo Domingo City, 8 Aug
1905, A. Busck (USNM, 12198; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 49). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in deep freshwater crabhole near river.
15. Culex (C.) carmodyae Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype larval skin (151.2) with associated pupal skin and?, Samana Bay, 28
Sept 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in slow-running dirty watercourse across a road.
16. Culex (C.) regulator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Lec- —
totype larval skin (119.3) with associated pupal skin, male genitalia slide (423)
and pinned o, near Santo Domingo City, 22 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957a: 55). BIONOMICS: Larvae in an old bucket left
in field.
17. Culex (C.) lamentator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= secutor]. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (124.1) with associated pupal skin and 2, San Francisco Mts,
28 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in hollow palm trunk.
18. Culex (Melanoconion) carcinophilus Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (89.3) with associated pupal skin and 0, south of Santo Domin-
go City, 7 Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in crabhole in lagoon along river; hole made and inhabited
by crab but rather large and with water up to within one foot of ground surface.
19. Culex (Mel.) inhibitator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Syntype larvae and
fragmentary larval skin (135), San Francisco Mts, 3 Sept 1905, A. Busck
(USNM; see Stone and Knight 1957a: a BIONOMICS: Larvae in a slowly
running, clear cold spring.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 19
List of Localities
SAMANA |
Samana Bay, probably near the port of Samana: 15. Culex (C.) carmodyae.
SANTO DOMINGO
San Francisco Mts; no.mountains by this name can be located on any map
or in any gazeteer available to us; however, between collections at this locality
A. Busck visited San Cristobal (coll. 142) and there is a village of San Fran-
cisco in the mountains about 7 miles northwest of this city; therefore we be-
lieve that this material came from the mountains near the village of San Fran-
cisco and that it was variously mislabeled St. Francisco Mts, S. Francisco
Mts and San Francisco Mts: 2. Toxorhynchites (L.) haitiensis; 5. Wyeomyia
(W.) sororcula; 11. Aedes (H.) albonotatus; 12. Culex (C.) duplicator; 17. Cu-
lex (C.) lamentator; 19. Culex (Mel. ) inhibitator.
Santo Domingo and vicinity: I. Anopheles (N.) albimanus; 3. Wyeomyia
(W.) glaucocephala; 4. Wyeomyia (W.) ochrura; 6. Sabethes (S.) bipartipes; 7.
Psorophora (G.) infine; 8. Psorophora (G.) insularia; 9. Aedes (O.) balteatus :
10. Aedes (F.) mediovittatus; 13. Culex (C.) habilitator; 14. Culex (C.) eremi-
ta; 16. Culex (C.) regulator; 18, Culex (Mel. ) carcinophilus.
ECUADOR
List of Species
1. Anopheles (A. ) levicastilloi Levi-Castillo, 1944 [= ssp. of pseudopuncti-
pennis]. TYPE: o& and eggs, Guayas Province, no other data (LU). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in various small, sunlit permanent and semi-perma-
nent ground waters with algae].
2. Anopheles (A.) rivadeneirai Levi-Castillo, 1945 [= ssp. of pseudopuncti-
pennis]. TYPE: Syntypes <, 2, eggs, larvae and pupae, Interandian region
(provinces of Azuay, Canar, Carchi, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, Imbabura, Loja,
Pichincha, Tungurahua), no data on specific localities, dates or collectors (LU).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in various open permanent or semi-permanent
ground waters].
3. Anopheles (Lophopodomyia) gomezdelatorrei Levi-Castillo, 1955. TYPE:
Holotype & with associated larval and pupal skins, Hacienda Chiltazon (Carchi),
elev. 2880 m, Oct 1954, V. H. Andrade (CEIE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in caves
in paramo zone.
4. Trichoprosopon (T.) andinum Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE: Holotype
with associated larval and pupal skins, ancient mines of Macuchi (Cotopaxi),
elev. 1500 m, date not specified, R. Levi-Castillo (LU). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in bamboo stumps filled with rainwater.
*5. Trichoprosopon (Vonplessenia) vonplesseni (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Upper Pastaza River (Napo-Pastaza), date not specified, Baron
von Plessen (USNM, 9982; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 119). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in bamboo or leaf axils of Heliconia].
6. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) cotopaxensis Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE:
Holotype & with associated pupal skin, ancient mines of Macuchi (Cotopaxi),
elev. 1500 m, date not specified, R. Levi-Castillo (LU). BIONOMICS: Pupae
in bamboo stumps filled with rainwater.
20 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
7. Wyeomyia (W.) aequatorialis Levi-Castillo, 1952 [= aphobema]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, near Tena (Napo-Pastaza), date not specified, R. Levi-Castillo
(CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads]. Adults of type series
collected resting on a tree near a Clearing in virgin tropical jungle.
8. Wyeomyia aequatorianna Levi-Castillo, 1954. TYPE: Holotype o with as-
sociated larval and pupal skins, Pichilingue (Los Rios), date not specified, R.
Levi-Castillo (CEIE). BIONOMICS: Larvae and pupae in leaf axils of "cama-
chos"’ (Araceae).
9. Wyeomyia amazonica Levi-Castillo, 1954. TYPE: Holotype o, Tena
(Napo-Pastaza), elev. 500 m, date not specified, R. Levi-Castillo (CEIE). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads]. Holotype captured with a net in
the forest.
10. Phoniomyia esmeraldasi Levi-Castillo, 1955. TYPE: Holotype & with ©
genitalia slide, Changuaral Island, Bahia de Ancon de Sardinas (Esmeraldas),
date not specified, R. Levi-Castillo (CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in bromeliads].
11. Limatus andinus Levi-Castillo, 1954. TYPE: Holotype o, Valencia
(Los Rios), 14 Oct 1953, R. Levi-Castillo (CEIE). BIONOMICS: | Larvae prob-
ably in bamboo, treeholes or plant parts on ground]. Holotype captured with a
net in the forest.
12. Limatus guayasi Levi-Castillo, 1954. TYPE: Holotype *, El Empalme
(Guayas), forest near intersection of the road Balzar to Empalme with road
Quevedo to Manta, 2 km from road to the parish of Guayas, elev. 50 m, date
not specified, R. Levi-Castillo (CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
bamboo, treeholes or plant parts on ground].
13. Sabethes (Sabethoides) chloropterus (Humboldt, 1819). TYPE: Adult(s),
Guayaquil [Guayas] River near Borodon [Samborodon] (Guayas), no other data
- (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes and bamboo internodes with
small lateral opening; bamboo traps with small lateral hole should be used].
14. Uranotaenia aequatorianna Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE: 2¢, 19, Baba-
hoyo (Los Rios), no other data (CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
various permanent ground waters with vegetation].
15. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) ferox (Humboldt, 1819). TYPE: Adult(s),
Borodon [Samborodon] (Guayas), no other data (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in temporary rain pools in wooded areas].
*16. Psorophora (Grabhamia) garciai (Levi-Castillo, 1953) [= cingulata].
TYPE: Holotype o’, Dos Rios, Region de Tena (Napo-Pastaza), no other data
eee BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in grassy sunlit temporary ground
waters].
17. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) camposanus Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype ¢,
Guayaquil (Guayas), date not specified, F. Campos Ribadeneira (USNM, 21916;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 216). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in
temporary ground pools].
18. Aedes (Finlaya) metoecopus Dyar, 1925 [= terrens]. TYPE: Lectotype
o (2107186) with genitalia slide (2107), Ecuador, date not specified, F. Cam-
pos Ribadeneira (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 221). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes]. _ :
*19. Haemagogus (Longipalpifer) panarchys Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Holotype o
(70) with most of abdomen mounted on slide (1466), El Salado, Guayaquil (Gua-
yas), date not specified, F. Campos Ribadeneira (USNM, 24331; see Stone and
Knight 1955: 288). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo].
20. Haemagogus (Longipalpifer) soperi Levi-Castillo, 1955. TYPE: Holo-
type o with associated larval and pupal skins, Juan Montalvo (Los Rios), no
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 21
other data (CEIE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo stumps. ;
21. Haemagogus (H.) garciai Levi-Castillo, 1955. TYPE: Holotype o with
genitalia slide, Changuaral Island, Bahia de Ancon de Sardinas (Esmeraldas),
no other data (CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo].
22. Culex (C.) azuayus Levi-Castillo, 1954. TYPE: Holotype o with asso-
ciated larval and pupal skins, Zhurucuchu [Surucucho] (Azuay), elev. 3500 m,
no other data (CEIE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
23. Culex (C.) camposi Dyar, 1925 [= ssp. of coronator]. TYPE: Holotype
o’, Ecuador, locality and other data not specified (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in all types of ground waters].
24. Culex (C.) guayasi Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE: ? and © with genitalia
slide (LR 5020), Babahoyo (Los Rios), no other data (CEIE). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
25. Culex (C.) levicastilloi Lane, 1945. TYPE: Holotype o& (4772), Ecua-
dor, locality not specified, Mar 1944, R. Levi-Castillo (FH). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
26. Culex (C.) quitensis Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE: 2 o, 19 with asso-
ciated larval and pupal skins, near Quito (Pichincha), elev. 2900 m, no other
data (CEIE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
27. Culex (Carrollia) babahoyensis Levi-Castillo, 1953. TYPE: Holotype
co’, Hacienda "Mora," Juan Montalvo (Los Rios), no other data (USNM). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in bamboo stumps.
28. Culex maculatus Humboldt, 1819. TYPE: Adult(s), near Babahoyo
(Los Rios), no other data (LU). -Nomen dubium.
List of Localities
AZUAY
Surucucho (as Zhurucuchu): 22. Culex (C.) azuayus.
CARCHI
Hacienda Chiltazon: 3. Anopheles (L.) gomezdelatorrei.
COTOPAXI
Macuchi ancient mines: 4. Trichoprosopon (T.) andinum; 6. Trichoproso-
pon (R.) cotopaxensis.
ECUADOR
Interandian region (Azuay, Canar, Carchi, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, Imba-
bura, Loja, Pichincha, Tungurahua): 2. Anopheles (A.) rivadeneirai.
Locality not specified, probably near Guayaquil: 18. Aedes (F.) metoeco-
pus; 23. Culex (C.) camposi; 25. Culex (C.) levicastilloi.
ESMERALDAS
Changuaral Island (Bahia de Ancon de Sardinas): 10. Phoniomyia esmeral-
dasi; 21. Haemagogus (H.) garciai.
GUAYAS |
El Empalme, intersection of road Balzar-Empalme with road Quevedo-
Manta, 2 km from road to Guayas: 12. Limatus guayasi.
Guayaquil and vicinity: 17. Aedes (O.) camposanus; 19. Haemagogus (L.)
panarchys (El Salado). .
Locality not specified: 1. Anopheles (A.) levicastilloi.
Samborodon and vicinity (as Borodon): 13. Sabethes (Sabethoides) chlorop-
terus (Guayas River); 15. Psorophora (J.) ferox.
22 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
LOS RIOS
Babahoyo and vicinity: 14. Uranotaenia aequatorianna; 24. Culex (C.) gua-
yasi; 28. Culex maculatus.
Montalvo (Juan) and vicinity: 20. Haemagogus (L.) soperi; 27. Culex (Car-
rollia) babahoyensis (Hacienda 'Mora"').
Pichilingue: 8. Wyeomyia aequatorianna.
Valencia: 11. Limatus andinus.
NAPO-PASTAZA
Pastaza (Rio), upper: 5. Trichoprosopon (Vonplessenia) vonplesseni.
Tena and vicinity: 7. Wyeomyia (W.) aequatorialis; 9. Wyeomyia amazoni-
ca; 16. Psorophora (G.) garciai.
PICHINCHA
Quito and vicinity: 26. Culex (C.) quitensis.
EL SALVADOR
List of Species
1. Wyeomyia (W.) megalodora Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= celaenocephala].
TYPE: Lectotype 2, Sonsonate, 30 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 11993; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in brome-
liads].
2. Wyeomyia (W.) mataea Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= celaenocephala]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Sonsonate, 19 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 11994; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
3. Wyeomyia (W.) hemisagnosta Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype lar-
val skin on slide (330 pi), Sonsonate, 30 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9984; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONOMICS: Larvae in coconut husks
on a plantation just out of town.
4. Wyeomyia (W.) baria Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= hemisagnosta]. TYPE: Hol-
otype , Sonsonate, 30 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 11992). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in plant parts on ground and treeholes].
5. Wyeomyia (W.) ablechra Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= mitchellii]. TYPE: Lec-
totype ?, Sonsonate, 16 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 11895; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
*6. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) aporonoma Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (330 zd) with associated pupal skin and o, Sonsonate, 30 Aug
1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9983; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 121). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in coconut husks.
7. Aedes (Finlaya) podographicus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= terrens]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2 (325j), Sonsonate, 18 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 10015; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1956a: 224). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
8. Haemagogus (H.) regalis Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype “ (330 v)
with associated larval (fragment) and pupal skins and genitalia slide (36.1. 8b),
Sonsonate, 30 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 10024; see Stone and Knight 1955:
289). BIONOMICS: Larvae in old coconut husks with foul water.
List of Localities
All species originally described from El Salvador were collected in Soso-
nate and vicinity.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 20
FRENCH GUIANA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (Stethomyia) canorii Floch & Abonnenc, 1945. TYPE: Holo-
type o", Saut-Canori, Haut-Approuague (Inini), 13 Feb 1944 (PIP, 704). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in shaded streams].
2. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) ininii Senevet & Abonnenc, 1938. TYPE: 2 9
(G 998) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slides, St. Elie
mines, Sinnamary River (Inini), 7 Feb 1938 (LPFM 998). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in artificial impoundment. .
3. Anopheles (N.) sanctielii Senevet & Abonnenc, 1938. TYPE: Holotype 0
(G 999) with genitalia slide, St. Elie mines, Sinnamary River (Inini), 7 Feb
1938 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in artificial impoundment.
*4. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius, 1787). TYPE:
Adult, ''Cayennae Dom. v. Rohr'' (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bro-
meliads]. |
5. Wyeomyia (W.) robusta Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype 0
(G 927) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Saut-Tigre,
Sinnamary River (Inini), 30 Nov 1937 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larva in epiphy-
tic bromeliad (2.5 m).
6. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) albocaerulea Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939 [= ar-
genteorostris]. TYPE: ¢ and larvae, Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini),
Jan 1938 (PIA). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
7. Wyeomyia (D.) luciae Senevet, Chabelard & Abonnenc, 1942 © chalco-
cephala]. TYPE: Holotype o (M 1553) with associated larval and pupal skins
and genitalia slide, Port-Inini, near Cayenne (Guyane), 18 Aug 1939 (LPFM).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in axils of 'balourous" (Heliconia).
8. Wyeomyia (D.) compta Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype
(641-3), Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 1 Jan 1938 (LPFM). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
9. Wyeomyia (D.) rorotai Senevet, Chabelard & Abonnenc, 1942 [= pseudo-
pecten]. TYPE: &% (M 1543) with genitalia mount and ? (M 1544) with pupal
skin and larva, heights of Rorota, Montagne du Mahury, near Cayenne (Guyane),
6 July 1939 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
10. Wyeomyia (D.) testei Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype &
(G 938, 5, 1) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia mount, Saut-
Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 13 Dec 1937 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
epiphytic bromeliads.
11. Limatus martiali Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype o (G 924,
5, 1) with genitalia mount, Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 28 Nov 1937,
(LU). BIONOMICS: Larvae in dried leaf filled with water.
12. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) martineti Senevet, 1937. TYPE: Holotype & (G
113) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia mount, Pointe des
Amandiers, Cayenne (Guyane), 1934, G. Senevet (LP FM). BIONOMICS: Larva
in rockhole at seaside.
13. Aedes (Finlaya) draconarius Dyar, 1922 [= fluviatilis]. TYPE: Lecto-
type , St. Laurent du Maroni (Guyane), 1909, E. Brimont (USNM, 25765; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 201). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
rockholes along rivers].
14. Culex (C.) rigidus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939 [= corniger]. TYPE: Syn-
types & and ¢ (G 975) with associated larval and pupal skins and male genitalia
24 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
mount, Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 20 Jan 1938 (LPFM). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in hole for domestic wastes filled with rainwater.
15. Culex (C.) pseudojanthinosoma Senevet & Abonnenc, 1946. TYPE: Hol-
otype ¢ (1553 M) with associated larval and pupal skins, locality not specified,
1939 (PIA). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent
ground pools].
16. Culex (C.) tisseuili Senevet, 1937. TYPE: Holotype & (G116) with gen-
italia mount, Cayenne (Guyane), 3 Aug 1934, G. Senevet (LP FM). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a vessel filled with soapy water in the public hospital.
17. Culex (Melanoconion) aurilatus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939 [= chrysono-
tum]. TYPE: Holotype o (G 864) with associated larval and pupal skins and
genitalia mount, locality and other data not specified (LPFM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent ground waters]. , :
18. Culex (Mel. ) comatus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype &
(G 959) with associated larva and genitalia mount, Crique Mangue, Saut-Tigre,
Sinnamary River (Inini), 20 Jan 1938 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in flooded
area around creek in the forest.
19. Culex (Mel.) equinoxialis Floch & Abonnenc, 1945. TYPE: Holotype &*
(687) with genitalia mount, Camp Rochambeau, near Cayenne airport (Guyane),
29 May 1943 (PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground
waters|. Adults captured in forest. |
20. Culex (Mel.) implicatus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype &
(G 899, 5) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia mount, Petit-
Saut, Sinnamary River (Inini), 24 Oct 1937 (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
rockholes.
21. Culex (Mel.) punctiscapularis Floch & Abonnenc, 1946 [= nigrimacula].
TYPE: Holotype “ with genitalia mount, Crique Anguille, near Cayenne
(Guyane), 18 June 1946 (PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
-This is probably not a Melanoconion.
22. Culex (Mel.) patientiae Floch & Fauran, 1955. TYPE: Holotype * gen-
italia only (942), Patience, Haute-Mana (Inini), no other data (PIG). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
23. Culex (Mel.) vidali Floch & Fauran, 1954 [= phlogistus]|. TYPE: Holo-
type & (941) with genitalia mount, near Moulin-de-Vidal, Ile de Cayenne
(Guyane), no other data (PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent
ground waters]. Adult captured in a burrow in undergrowth.
24. Culex (Mel.) productus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype
(G 997e) with associated larval skin and genitalia mount, Saint-Elie, Sinna-
mary River (Inini), 7 Feb 1938 (LP FM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a watering-
can containing a little water; [probably normally in ground waters]. :
25. Culex (Mel.) cavernicolus Floch & Abonnenc, 1945 [= putumayensis].
TYPE: Holotype o (280) with genitalia mount, Cayenne (Guyane), 17 Jan 1940
(PIG). BIONOMICS: Larvae in burrows or excavations in the ground.
26. Culex (Mel.) rabanicolus Floch & Abonnenc, 1946. TYPE: Holotype ¢
(696), Chemin de Raban, Raban, near Cayenne (Guyane), 5 Aug 1943 (PIG).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
27. Culex (Mel.) rorotaensis Floch & Abonnenc, 1946. TYPE: Holotype
(655a), Rorota, Montagne du Mahury, near Cayenne (Guyane), no other data
(PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
28. Culex (Mel.) tournieri Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype &
with associated larval skin (G 958b) and genitalia mount (G 958d), Crique
Mangue, near Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 20 Jan 1938 (LPFM).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in flooded forest.
ei le ae a a I ee a BN a on ee —
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 25
29. Culex (Mel.) trisetosus Fauran, 1961. TYPE: Holotype with genitalia
mount, near St. Antoine at confluence of Oyac and Comté rivers (Guyane), 4
Feb 1957, P. Fauran (MNHP). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent
ground waters]. Holotype collected in undergrowth.
30. Culex (Mel.) portesi Senevet & Abonnenc, 1941 [= vomerifer]. TYPE:
Holotype * (61, 227 Ab2)-with genitalia slide, locality not specified (LPFM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
31. Culex (Mel.) cayennensis Floch & Abonnenc, 1945 [= vomerifer].
TYPE: Holotype o (286) with genitalia mount, Cayenne (Guyane), 17 Jan 1941
(PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
32. Culex (Mochlostyrax) radiatus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939 [= pilosus].
TYPE: Holotype & (G 971) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia
mount, one of the following localities, Marais Leblond, Cayenne (Guyane), 6
Feb 1937; Crique Anguille (Guyane), 21 Aug 1937; Crique Mangue, Crique
Plomb near Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 22-29 Jan 1938 (LPFM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in swamps, streams, flooded ground.
33. Culex (Microculex) reginae Floch & Fauran, 1955. TYPE: Holotype
genitalia (941), vicinity of Regina, Approuague River (Guyane), date not speci-
fied (PIG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
34. Culex (Aedinus) breviculus Senevet & Abonnenc, 1939. TYPE: Holotype
o (G 895) with genitalia mount, Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River (Inini), 24 Oct
1937 (LP FM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ground waters, treeholes or
bromeliads]. Holotype captured inside messhall.
35. Culex (Aedinus) cauchensis Floch & Abonnenc, 1945. TYPE: Holotype
(685b) with genitalia mount, Caux or Kaw (Guyane), date not specified (PIG).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in prospecting hole.
36. Culex (Carrollia) manaensis Floch & Fauran, 1955. TYPE: Holotype o
genitalia mount (909) with associated pupal skin, Boeuf-Mort (Massif Decon-
Decon), Haute-Mana (Inini), date not specified (PIG). BIONOMICS: Pupa in
bamboo internode. |
See also the species listed under MIDDLE AMERICA.
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) mathisi (Neveu-Lemaire, 1902) [= serratus] and *Cu-
lex (Aedinus) americanus (Neveu-Lemaire, 1902) listed-by Stone, Knight and
Starcke from French Guiana are actually from BRAZIL since Counani [Cunani]
is now included in Brazilian Guiana (Amapa).
List of Localities
FRENCH GUIANA
No locality specified: 15. Culex (C.) pseudojanthinosoma; 17. Culex (Mel.)
aurilatus; 30. Culex (Mel.) portesi.
GUYANE
Camp Rochambeau (near Cayenne airport): 19. Culex (Mel.) equinoxialis.
Caux (or Kaw): 35. Culex (A.) cauchensis.
Cayenne: 4. Toxorhynchites (L.) haemorrhoidalis; 12. Aedes (O.) martine-
ti (Pointe des Amandiers); 16. Culex (C.) tisseuli; 25. Culex (Mel.) caverni-
colus; 31. Culex (Mel.) cayennensis; 32. Culex (Mochl.) radiatus (Marais Le-
blond). See also species listed under MIDDLE AMERICA.
Crique Anguille: 21. Culex (Mel.) punctiscapularis; 32. Culex (Mochl.) ra-
diatus.
Moulin-de-Vidal, Ile de Cayenne: 23. Culex (Mel. ) vidali.
26 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
Port-Inini: 7. Wyeomyia (D.) luciae.
Raban, Chemin de Raban, near Montagne Tigre: 26. Culex (Mel.) rabanico-
lus.
~~ Regina, Approuague River: 33. Culex (Micr.) reginae.
_ Rorota, Montagne du Mahury: 9. Wyeomyia (D.) rorotai; 27. Culex (Mel. )
rorotaensis.
St. Antoine, confluence of Oyac and Comté rivers: 29. Culex (Mel.) trise-
tosus.
St. Laurent du Maroni: 13. Aedes (F.) draconarius.
ININI
Boeuf-Mort, Haute-Mana, Massif Decon-Decon: 36. Culex (Carrol. ) mana-
ensis.
Patience, Haute-Mana (upper part): 22. Culex (Mel. ) patientiae.
Petit-Saut, Sinnamary River: 20. Culex (Mel.) implicatus.
St. Elie, Sinnamary River: 2. Anopheles (N.) ininii; 3. Anopheles (N. )
sanctielii; 24. Culex (Mel. ) productus.
Saut-Canori, Haut-Approuague: 1. Anopheles (S.) canorii.
Saut-Tigre, Sinnamary River: 5. Wyeomyia (W.) robusta; 6. Wyeomyia (D.)
albocaerulea; 8. Wyeomyia (D.) compta; 10. Wyeomyia (D.) testei; 11. Lima-
tus martiali; 14. Culex (C.) rigidus; 18. Culex (Mel.) comatus (Crique Mangue);
28. Culex (Mel.) tournieri (Crique Mangue); 32. Culex (Mel.) radiatus (Crique
Mangue, Crique Plomb); 34. Culex (A.) breviculus.
GRENADA
List of Species"
1. Anopheles (A.) pseudopunctipennis Theobald, 1901. TYPE: %, 9, Gre-
nada, Feb. Hatton (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in ground pools and streams,
usually clear water with algae].
*2. Wyeomyia (W.) grayii Theobald, 1901 [= pertinans]. TYPE: 2, Ballast
Ground (63), Feb 1900, W. E. Broadway; also from St. Lucia (BM). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
3. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) grenadensis Edwards, 1916 [= melanocephala].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Grenada, A. Macdonald (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in Heliconia or leaf axils of other plants]. |
4. Aedes (Howardina) thaxteri Dyar & Knab, 1919 [= busckii]. TYPE: Hol-
otype §, Grand Etang, Nov 1912, R. Thaxter (USNM, 21704). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in flower bracts of Heliconia.
5. Culex (C.) inflictus Theobald, 1901. TYPE: 2, Grenada, Mar, W. E.
Broadway (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in crabholes].
6. Culex (C.) scholasticus Theobald, 1901 [= inflictus]. TYPE: ¢, 9,
Grenada (63), 14 Feb and Mar 1900, W. E. Broadway; also from St. Lucia and
St. Vincent (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in crabholes].
7. Culex (Melanoconion) jocasta Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype
o genitalia, near Grenville, 4 July 1929, F. M. Root (USNM, 59873). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in a small dirty pool in roadside ditch.
List of Localities
Ballast Ground: 2. Wyeomyia (W.) grayii.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 27
Grand Etang: 4. Aedes (H.) thaxteri.
Grenville: 7. Culex (Mel.) jocasta.
No locality specified: 1. Anopheles (A.) pseudopunctipennis; 3. Wyeomyia
(D.) grenadensis; 5. Culex (C.) inflictus; 6. Culex (C.) scholasticus.
GUADELOUPE
List of Species
1. Toxorhynchites (L.) guadeloupensis (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE: Holo-
type (79.1), La Soufriere, elev. 3000 ft, 30 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM,
9956; see Stone and Knight 1957c: 199). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bro-
meliad high up in tree. 2
2. Wyeomyia antillarum Floch & Abonnenc, 1945. TYPE: Syntypes, o (63)
Matouba, 2 (56) St. Claude, both with associated larval and pupal skins, Nov
1944, M. Chassignet (PIG). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
3. Culex (Melanoconion) advieri Senevet, 1938 [= atratus]. TYPE: Holotype
o (G 534) with associated pupal skin and genitalia mount, Prise d'Eau, above
water point, elev. 90 m, 27 Aug 1936, G. Senevet (LP FM). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in a minute breeding site in association with Anopheles (A. ) argyritarsis
and Culex (Mel. ) bonneti. |
4. Culex (Mel.) bonneti Senevet, 1938 [= elevator]. TYPE: Holotype &
(G 556) with associated pupal skin and genitalia mount, Prise d'Eau, above
water point, elev. 90 m, 27 Aug 1936, G. Senevet (LPFM). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in a minute breeding site in association with Anopheles (A.) argyritarsis
and Culex (Mel. ) advieri.
*5. Culex (Aedinus) bisulcatus (Coquillett, 1906) [= americanus]. TYPE:
Lectotype o& (82.3) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide
(1648), La Soufriére, elev. 3000 ft, 30 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 8291; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 44). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bro-
meliads. ,
List of Localities
Matouba: 2. Wyeomyia antillarum.
Prise d'Eau: 3. Culex (Mel.) advieri; 4. Culex (Mel. ) bonneti.
St. Claude: 2. Wyeomyia antillarum.
Soufriere, elev. 3000 ft: 1. Toxorhynchites (L.) guadeloupensis; 5. Culex
(A.) bisulcatus.
GUATEMALA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (A.) apicimacula Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype e;
Livingston (Izabal), 11 May 1906, H. S. Barber (USNM, 9978; see Stone and
Knight 1956b: 276). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shaded ground pools, in pools
formed by sluggish streams or in swamps].
2. Anopheles (A.) eiseni Coquillett, 1902. TYPE: Holotype ?, Aguna (Es-
cuintla), elev. 2000 ft, Gustav Eisen (USNM, 6699; see Stone and Knight 1956b:
28 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
277). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shaded pools near streams, open treeholes and
broken bamboo].
3. Anopheles (A.) hectoris Giaquinto, 1931. TYPE: o, 9, larva, Guatema-
la (Guatemala) (A). BIONOMICS: Larvae in small, shallow, slow-flowing
streams filled with algae.
4. Anopheles (A.) guatemalensis de Leon, 1938 [= var. of parapunctipennis|.
TYPE: oc, °, larva, pupa, Cumbre del Aire (Totonicapan), elev. 10000 ft, J.
Romeo de Leon (ESPG). BIONOMICS: Larvae in cold springs.
5. Anopheles (A.) vestitipennis Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype &,
Cacao, Trece Aguas (Alta Verapaz), 7-14 Apr 1906, E. A. Schwarz and H. S.
Barber (USNM, 9976; selection of Stone in Russell, Rozeboom and Stone 1943:
34). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in cool shaded water in streams, pools and ponds;
also in stagnant ditches filled with vegetation].
*6. Anopheles (A.) xelajuensis de Leon, 1938. TYPE: o, Cerro Quemado,
Xelaju (Quezaltenango), J. Romeo de Leon (ESPG). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
treeholes].
7. Trichoprosopon Ghapnowians) moralesi (Dyar & Knab, 1919. TYPE:
Lectotype 9, San Felipe (Retalhuleu), Dr. Morales (USNM, 21997: selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 118). BIONOMICS: | Larvae in leaf axils of "matata, '’
Araceae? |.
8. Wyeomyia (W.) celaenocephala Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype °,
Cacao, Trece Aguas (Alta Verapaz), 15 Apr 1906, E. A. Schwarz and H. S.
Barber (USNM, 10006). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in terrestrial and/or
epiphytic bromeliads].
9. Wyeomyia (W.) guatemala Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= mitchellii]. TYPE:
Holotype 2, Cacao, Trece Aguas (Alta Verapaz), 17 Apr 1906, E. A. Schwarz
and H. S. Barber (USNM, 9994; see Stone and Knight 195 7b: 123). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in epiphytic bromeliads].
10. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) chalcocephala Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE:
Holotype © with genitalia slide (352), Cacao, Trece Aguas (Alta Verapaz), 1-17
Apr 1906, H. S. Barber (USNM, 1002; see Stone and Knight 1957b: 121-122).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in flower bracts of Heliconia with upright flowers.
*11. Wyeomyia (D.) galoa Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= pseudopecten]. TYPE:
Holotype ? (3), Cacao,Trece Aguas (Alta Verapaz), 15 Apr 1906, H. S. Barber
(USNM, 10001; see Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONOMICS: Larvae in flow-
er bracts of Heliconia with upright flowers.
12. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) champerico (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE:
Holotype ?, Champerico (Retalhuleu), 3 Aug 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9968). BI-
ONOMICS: | Larvae probably in temporary taanpools or creek overflows in
wooded areas]. |
13. Aedes (Howardina) quadrivittatus iCoaniliet!, 1902). TYPE: Holotype
°, Chacula (Huehuetenango), elev. 6600 ft, 13 June 1902, Gustav Eisen (USNM,
6560; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 224). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in epi-
phytic bromeliads].
List of Localities
ALTA VERAPAZ
Cacao, Trece Aguas; probably Finca Secacao, north of La Tinta, along
a tributary of the Rio Polochic, a few miles west of Panzos: 5. Anopheles (A.)
vestitipennis; 8. Wyeomyia (W.) celaenocephala; 9. Wyeomyia (W.) guatema-.
la; 10. Wyeomyia (D.) chalcocephala; 11. Wyeomyia (D.) galoa.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 29
ESCUINTLA 7
Aguna, elev. 2000 ft: 2. Anopheles (A. ) eiseni.
GUATEMALA
Guatemala: 3. Anopheles (A.) hectoris.
HUEHUETENANGO
Chacula, archeological site in Municipio Nenton: 13. Aedes (H.) quadrivit-
tatus.
IZABAL
Livingston: 1. Anopheles (A.) apicimacula.
QUEZALTENANGO
Cerro Quemada, near Xelaji [Quezaltenango|: 6. Anopheles (A.) xelajuen-
sis. |
RETALHULEU
Champerico: 12. Psorophora (J.) champerico.
San Felipe: 7. Trichoprosopon (Sh. ) moralesi.
TOTONICA PAN
Cumbre del Aire, elev. 10000 ft; probably Cumbre Rosa del Aire in Muni-
cipio San Bartolomé: 4. Anopheles (A.) guatemalensis.
HAITI
List of Species
1. Limatus hoffmani Root, 1927. TYPE: Holotype * with associated larval
and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Riviere Froide (west of Port-au-Prince),
14 Oct 1924, W. A. Hoffman (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in tree-
holes, fallen leaves or coconut shells]. Type collection made on a hillside.
2. Uranotaenia cooki Root, 1937. TYPE: Lectotype “ represented by a
foreleg, portion of tarsus of another leg and genitalia, all mounted on a slide,
Port-au-Prince, 11 Feb 1932, S. S. Cook (USNM, 50375; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957c: 200). BIONOMICS: Larvae in small pools of quiet water on
jutting ledges of rock in a ravine, shaded at all times and containing rotting
leaves. Adults on under surface of rock ledges.
HONDURAS
List of Species
1. Culex (Melanoconion) intonsus Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holo-
type o and genitalia mounted on same slide, Lancetilla Valley, Tela (Atlanti-
da), 2 Oct 1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in deep ground pools
with much vegetation]. Holotype captured at light. :
2. Culex (Mel.) opisthopus Komp, 1926. TYPE: Lectotype “ (2177) with
genitalia slide, United Fruit Co. hospital, Puerto Castilla (Colon), Mar 1925,
W. H. W. Komp (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 54). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in swamp north of hospital]. Adults taken in damp protected
spot on the walls of an angle of the hospital.
30 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
JAMAICA
List of Species
*1,. Anopheles (A.) grabhamii Theobald, 1901. TYPE: Holotype ? (Pp )
mounted on slide (27), Kingston (St. Andrew), M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in stagnant water, swamps, river bed and rockpools and pasture pools].
2. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albipes Theobald, 1901; tarsimaculatus Goeldi,
1905, new name [= albimanus]. TYPE: o, ?, locality not specified, 7 Dec 1899
and 8 Feb 1900, M. Grabham; also from Antigua, Brazil and British Guiana
(BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in vegetation in sunlit permanent ground waters].
3. Wyeomyia (W.) hirsuta (Hill and Hill, 1946). TYPE: Holotype ?, Hermi-
tage Dam (St. Andrew), elev. 1500 ft, date not specified, R. B. Hill and C.
McD. Hill (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
4, Wyeomyia (W.) mitchellii (Theobald, 1905). TYPE: Holotype ¢, locality
not specified, Jan 1904, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
epiphytic bromeliads, Tillandsia].
5. Uranotaenia socialis Theobald, 1901. TYPE: o, 2 (11), Kingston (St.
Andrew), Mar 1900, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in stagnant per-
manent pools; [collected later at Rockfort, near Kingston in permanent pools].
6. Orthopodomyia waverleyi (Grabham, 1907) [= signifera]. TYPE: Adults,
Waverley Estate, Constant Spring (St. Andrew), 1 Sept 1906, M. Grabham (NE).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in thick coffee-like water: in hollow mango trees.
7. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) echinata (Grabham, 1906) [= ferox]. TYPE:
o, 2, larva, about 5.75 m along Molynes Road, near Kingston (St. Andrew),
early Apr 1906, M. Grabham (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a temporary pool
in a logwood thicket. |
8. Psorophora (J.) jamaicensis (Theobald, 1907) [= ferox]. TYPE: 2, Run-
away Bay (St. Ann), Lord Walsingham; Kingston (St. Andrew), M. Grabham;
Apr and July (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary pools in
wooded thickets]. |
9. Psorophora (J.) johnstonii (Grabham, 1905). TYPE: 4 syntypes, at
foot of Red Hills, 5.5 miles along Molynes Road, Kingston (St. Andrew), early
July 1905, M. Grabham (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in shaded temp-
orary pools in wooded thickets]. Type series taken on a horse.
*10. Psorophora (Grabhamia) jamaicensis (Theobald, 1901) [= confinnis].
TYPE: 2, Spanish Town Road, Kingston (St. Andrew), 8 Feb 1900, M. Grab-
ham (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in open grassy temporary rain-
pools or irrigation overflows].
11. Psorophora (G.) walsinghamii (Theobald, 1907) [= confinnis]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Runaway Bay (St. Ann), Apr, Lord Walsingham (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in open grassy temporary rainpools or irrigation overflows].
12. Psorophora (G.) haruspicus (Dyar & Knab, 1908) [= insularia]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Port Antonio (Portland), 15 Nov 1906, M. Grabham (USNM, 11995;
selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 284). BIONOMICS: Larvae in seaside pools
in coral rock; [water probably saline and temporary].
13. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) hemisurus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= scapularis].
TYPE: Larva, Rio Cobre Canal Dam, near Spanish Town (St. Catherine), 17
Jan 1905, M. Grabham (NE; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in temporary freshwater pools.
14. Aedes (O.) pertinax Grabham, 1906 [= serratus]. TYPE: Lectotype &
with genitalia slide (206), Kingston (St. Andrew), 10 Apr 1906, M. Grabham
EO
a
a a a a ee ae Oe a em Re A eh re RS “<
OS ey ee er
Se a ee ee
a
ae a ae
SS
IB
5 eg
CS a ad lo carr ne
z : x
2S Se ee a ES
a
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 31
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIONOMICS: Larvae in tem-
orary rainpools
15. Aedes (O.) quasiserratus (Theobald, 1907) [= serratus]. TYPE: 2, Red
Hills (St. Andrew), June and 10 July 1906, Lord Walsingham and M. Grabham;
also Brazil (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary rainpools].
16. Aedes (O.) tortilis (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: 2, Kingston (St. Andrew),
Aug, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary rainpools].
17. Aedes (O.) auratus Grabham, 1906 [= tortilis]. TYPE: o, 9, larva,
Kingston (St. Andrew), date not specified, M. Grabham (NE). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in temporary rainpools.
18. Aedes (Finlaya) uncatus Grabham, 1907 [= mediovittatus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o with genitalia slide (210), Waverley Estate, Constant Spring (St. An-
drew) or woods above Rockfort (Kingston), date not specified (USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight 1956a: 226). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
19. Aedes (Howardina) inaequalis (Grabham, 1907). TYPE: Lectotype “
with genitalia slide, Kingston (St. Andrew), date not specified, M. Grabham
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: Larvae in hol-
low trees (chiefly Anona palustris) by the seashore.
20. Aedes (H.) aureostriatus (Grabham, 1906) [= inaequalis]. TYPE: <, 9,
pupa, larva, Newcastle (St. Andrew), elev. 4000 ft, summer and autumn 1905,
Col. Loscombe and Miss Maclaverty (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
21. Aedes (H.) aurites (Theobald, 1907) [= inaequalis]. TYPE: 2, Newcas-
tle (St. Andrew), elev. 4000 ft, July, Col..Loscombe (BM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae in bromeliads].
22. Aedes (H.) stenei Thompson, 1956. TYPE: Holotype o (45090211) with
associated larval skin and male genitalia slide, near Hope Farm, just above
Porus, on road to Mandeville (Clarendon), elev. about 1000 ft, Sept 1945, G.A.
Thompson (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads. Females
are fierce biters, especially in the shade of bromeliad-laden trees.
*23. Aedes (H.) walkeri (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: Holotype 2, locality, date
and collector not specified (BM). BIONOMICS: | Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads;
very timid, hurrying to the bottom on the slightest provocation; collected at Ma-
vis Bank (St. Andrew) at elev. of 5000 ft, M. Grabham].
24. Haemagogus (Longipalpifer) equinus Theobald, 1903. TYPE: Holotype
°, lower end of Pound Road, Kingston (St. Andrew), 24 Aug, M. Grabham
(BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes]. Type taken feeding on a horse.
25. Culex (C.) hassardii Grabham, 1906 [= corniger]. TYPE: o, 9, larva,
pupa, Newcastle (St. Andrew), elev. 4000 ft, Sept 1905, Maj. Hassard (NE).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in a tank, [also in a water barrel].
26. Culex (C.) subfuscus Theobald, 1907 [= corniger|]. TYPE: Holotype ¢,
Moncague [Moneague] (St. Ann), Feb, Lord Walsingham (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in rockholes, treeholes, ground pools or artificial containers].
27. Culex (C.) janitor Theobald, 1903. TYPE: oc’, 2, Kingston, date not
specified, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in crabholes|. Adults
rest in crabholes along the seashore. |
28. Culex (C.) similis Theobald, 1903 [= nigripalpus]|. TYPE: Holotype &,
Red Hills (St. Andrew), 2 Mar 1902, M. Grabham (NE ?). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in permanent ground waters or artificial containers].
29. Culex (C.) microsquamosus Theobald, 1905 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: ,
°, Rfo Cobre Canal Dam, near Spanish Town (St. Catherine), 17 Jan 1905, M.
Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in algae-covered ground pools.
32 Contr, Amer. Ent. Inst., vol: 1, no..5, 1965
30. Culex (C.) revocator Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= pipiens quinquefasciatus].
TYPE: Lectotype o, Hope Gardens, Kingston (St. Andrew), date not specified,
M. Grabham (USNM, 12100; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 55). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in ground pools contaminated with domestic wastes or
in artificial containers].
31. Culex (C.) secutor Theobald, 1901. TYPE: o, @ (iii), Cinchona (St.
Andrew), elev. 4900 ft, Harris (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ground pools.
32. Culex (C.) quasisecutor Theobald, 1907 [= secutor]. TYPE: oo
Newcastle (St. Andrew), elev. 4000 ft, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in ground pools].
*33. Culex (Melanoconion) atratus Theobald, 1901. TYPE: cc, ¢, Ferry
swamp (St. Catherine), 7 Dec 1899, F. Cundall and 8 Feb 1900, M. Grabham;
also Trinidad (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in permanent ponds in mangrove
swamps.
34. Culex (Mel.) annulipes Theobald 1907 [= taeniopus]. TYPE: Holotype
°, Red Hills (St. Andrew), date not specified, M. Grabham (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in ground waters with high organic content; larvae presumably
of this species have been collected in rockpools along the course of a stream
and containing dead leaves and flower petals].
35. Culex (Mochlostyrax) jamaicensis (Grabham, 1906); reductor Dyar &
Knab, 1909, new name [= pilosus]. TYPE o, 9, larva, near Kingston (St.
Andrew), date not specified, M. Grabham (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in per-
manent and temporary ground pools; rest on backs on bottom of pools.
*36. Deinocerites cancer Theobald, 1901. TYPE: Holotype 2, Spanish Town
Road, Kingston (St. Andrew), 8 Feb 1900, M. Grabham (BM; marked as type
by Theobald, see Belkin and Hogue 1959: 432). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crab-
holes.
37. Corethrella appendiculata Grabham, 1906. TYPE: ¢, ¢, larva, pupa,
Kingston, May 1906, M. Grabham (USNM, 9960). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a
treehole with thick brown water.
List of Localities
CLARENDON
Hope Farm, north of Porus: 22. Aedes (H.) stenei.
JAMAICA
Locality not specified, probably Kingston and vicinity (see): 2. Anopheles
(N.) albipes; 4. Wyeomyia (W.) mitchellii.
PORTLAND |
Port Antonio: 12. Psorophora (G.) haruspicus.
ST. ANDREW AND KINGSTON
Cinchona, elev. 4900 ft: 31. Culex (C.) secutor.
Constant Spring, Waverley Estate: 6. Orthopodomyia waverleyi; 18. Aedes
(F.) uncatus.
Hermitage Dam: 3. Wyeomyia (W.) hirsuta.
Kingston and vicinity: 1. Anopheles (A.) grabhamii; 2. Anopheles (N.) albi-
pes; 4. Wyeomyia (W.) mitchellii; 5. Uranotaenia socialis; 7. Psorophora (J .)
echinata (5.75 m along Molynes Road); 10. Psorophora (G.) jamaicensis (Span-
ish Town Road); 14. Aedes (O.) pertinax; 16. Aedes (O.) tortilis; 17. Aedes
(O.) auratus; 18. Aedes (F.) uncatus (woods above Rockfort); 19. Aedes (H.)
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 30
inaequalis; 24. Haemagogus (L.) equinus (Lower end of Pound Road); 27. Cu-
lex (C.) janitor; 30. Culex (C.) revocator (Hope Gardens, Royal Botanical _
Gardens); 35. Culex (Mochl.) jamaicensis; 36. Deinocerites cancer (Spanish
Town Road); 37. Corethrella appendiculata.
Mavis Bank: 23. Aedes (H.) walkeri.
Newcastle, elev. 4000 ft: 20. Aedes (H.) aureostriatus; 21. Aedes (H.) au-
rites; 25. Culex (C.) hassardii; 32. Culex (C.) quasisecutor.
Red Hills: 9. Psorophora (J.) johnstonii; 15. Aedes (.) quasiserratus; 28.
Culex (C.) similis; 34. Culex (Mel.) annulipes.
ST. ANN
Moneague: 26. Culex (C.) subfuscus.
Runaway Bay: 8. Psorophora @J.) jamaicensis; 11. Psorophora (G.) wal-
singhamii. ;
ST. CATHERINE
Ferry, Ferry Swamp: 33. Culex (Mel.) atratus.
Spanish Town, Rio Cobre Canal Dam: 13. Aedes (O.) hemisurus; 23. Cu-
lex (C.) microsquamosus.
MARTINIQUE
List of Species
1. Wyeomyia (W.) colsoni Senevet & Quievreux, 1941 [= var. of quasilu-
teoventralis]. TYPE: Adults and larvae (M 2136-M 2144), habitation Lamey-
nadie, near Colson, 14 Aug 1939, G. Senevet and L. Quiévreux (LPFM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads. |
2. Wyeomyia (W.) fratercula Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= vanduzeei]. TYPE: Hol-
otype 9, near Fort-de-France, 24 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9995). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in water in iron-work of an old mill.
2 3. Aedes (Soperia) tracei Senevet & Quievreux, 1941. TYPE: Holotype
(M 2163) with associated pupal skin and genitalia mount, near Piscine Colson,
14 Aug 1939, G. Senevet and L. Quievreux (LP FM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
"feuilles de balisier" (Heliconia leaf axils?). This species is undoubtedly Ae-
des (Howardina) busckii (Coquillett, 1906), NEW SYNONYMY.
4. Aedes (Stegomyia) frater (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827) [= aegypti]. TYPE:
o, "habitat in insulis Americae"'; probably from Martinique (Fort-de- France),
see MIDDLE AMERICA (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in artificial containers].
5. Culex (Melanoconion) madininensis Senevet, 1936. TYPE: Holotype
(1204), Trinite, July 1934, G. Senevet (LPFM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in ground waters].
List of Localities
Colson, route de Trace: 1. Wyeomyia (W.) colsoni (habitation Lameynadie);
3. Aedes (Sop.) tracei (near Piscine Colson).
Fort-de-France: 2. Wyeomyia (W.) fratercula; 4. Aedes (Steg. ) frater.
Trinité: 5. Culex (Mel. ) madininensis.
34 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
MEXICO
List of Species
1. Anopheles (A.) aztecus Hoffmann, 1935. TYPE: 0, ?, larva, egg, Valle
de Mexico (D. F.), elev. 2250 m, date not specified (UM). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in canals, ditches, irrigation ditches or pools.
zy Anopheles (A.) fausti Vargas, 1943. TYPE: Hointype larva, Tamazun-
chale (San Luis Potosi), Apr or May, M. Macias (ISET). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in treeholes.
3. Anopheles (A.) gabaldoni Vargas, 1941. TYPE: o, 2, Tenosique (Tabas-
co), Apr-May 1941 (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent ground
waters].
4. Anopheles (A.) cricillium Martini, 1932 [= hectoris]. TYPE: ¢, vicinity
of San Cristobal de las Casas (Chiapas), elev. 2000 m, 30 June 1926, A. Dampf
(LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in small permanent ponds].
5. Anopheles (A.) parapunctipennis Martini, 1932. TYPE: 0, 9, arroyo at
base of Cerro de Milpa Alta, near San Cristobal de las Casas (Chiapas),
et 1926, A. Dampf (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in cold springs at high. alti-
tude
6. Anopheles (A.) willardi Vargas, 1941 [= pseudopunctipennis franciscanus].
TYPE: o&, 2, larva, egg, Ciudad Juarez (Chihuahua) [the only locality cited in
stone, Knight and Starcke although 5 others given in original description], July-
Aug i941 (ISET). BIONOMICS: Larvae in sunlit streams and pools. Adults,
males and females enter houses and stables.
7. Anopheles (A.) strigimacula Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= punctimacula]. TYPE:
Holotype °, Cordoba (Veracruz), 13 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM, 9977). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in pools in a river bed ina deep ravine; the water was clear
and ri by large boulders [does not necessarily apply to holotype col-
lection}.
8. Anopheles (A.) stonei Vargas, 1941 [= punctipennis]. TYPE: 0, 2, Mon-
terrey (Nuevo Leon); May 1941, G. Rosas (ISET and USNM; lectotype apparent-
ly not selected; USNM syntypes not cited by Stone and Knight 1956b). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably along margins of deeply shaded streams and springs].
9. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) bisignatus Hoffmann, 1938 [= albimanus].
TYPE: Adults, Gonzalez (Tamaulipas), Nov; Tampico (Tamaulipas) June,’ Oct,
Nov, Dec, Jan; Altamira (Tamaulipas) June; El Mante (Tamaulipas) July; San
Jeronimo, Laguna de Tamiahua (Veracruz), June, July (UM). BIONOMICS:
| Larvae probably in vegetation in permanent sunlit ground waters].
10. Anopheles (N.) trisignatus Hoffmann, 1938 [= albimanus]. TYPE:
Adults, region of Tampico (Tamaulipas), Dec, Jan (UM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in vegetation in permanent sunlit ground waters].
11. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) grandiosus (Williston in Osten Sacken,
1900). TYPE: Holotype 9, near Omilteme (Guerrero), elev. 8000 ft, date not
specified, H. H. Smith (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes].
12. Toxorhynchites (L.) longipes (Theobald, 1901) [= grandiosus]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, locality, date and collector not specified (BM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in treeholes].
13. Wyeomyia (W.) abebela Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype & (430. 7)
with associated pupal skin and genitalia both on slide (355), Cordoba (Vera-
cruz), 17 Mar 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11987; selection of Stone and Knight
1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
SS OE LE PE ae a A I, RE tt TT EAT RIO oa IRE
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 35
14. Wyeomyia (W.) ablabes Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= mitchellii]. TYPE: Lec-
totype & 457 103) with genitalia slide (302), Cordoba (Veracruz), Dec 1907,
Jan and Mar 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11986; selection of Stone and Knight
1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
15. Wyeomyia (W.) stonei Vargas & Martinez Palacios, 1953. TYPE: Hol-
otype & (6285-1), Poana, Teapa, (Tabasco), 26 Mar 1946, M. Macias (ISET).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
16. Sabethes (S.) ortizi Vargas & Diaz Najera, 1961. TYPE: Holotype &
with genitalia slide (6465), Aldea El Naranjo, road to Ruins of Palenque (Chia-
pas), 26 Mar 1958, A. Diaz Najera (SET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
treeholes with small lateral opening]. Holotype taken while attempting to bite
(man or horse) in a thicket, humid and very shaded.
17. Uranotaenia coatzacoalcos Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Syntypes 2 lar-
vae, in very poor condition, Santa Lucrecia [Jesus Carranza] (Veracruz), 20
June 1905, F. Knab (USNM; see Stone and Knight 1957c: 200). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in ditch with reeds along railroad tracks. | 3
18. Uranotaenia basalis Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= coatzacoalcos].
TYPE: Holotype o&, Cordoba (Veracruz), 9 Jan 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 12259).
BIONOMICS: Larva in pool among rocks in a stream bed.
19. Psorophora (Psorophora) virescens Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= howardii].
TYPE: Holotype 2 (309g), Almoloya (Oaxaca), 19 July 1905, F. Knab (USNM,
9966; see Stone and Knight 1955: 287). BIONOMICS: Larvae in temporary
pools, usually of a muddy nature.
20. Psorophora (P.) simplex Martini, 1935 [= howardii]. TYPE: Lectotype
@, Valle del Yaqui (Sonora), 18 Aug 1927, A. Dampf (BM; selection of Mattingly
1955: 28). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in open grassy temporary rain-
pools].
21. Psorophora (P.) stonei Vargas, 1956. TYPE: o, 9, larva, Mazatlan
(Sinaloa) (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in open grassy temporary
pools].
22. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) pisces Lassmann, 1944 [= champerico].
TYPE: Lectotype “ genitalia slide, Tempoal (Veracruz), July 1944 (USNM;
selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 285). .BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
temporary rain or floodwater pools in wooded areas]. |
23. Psorophora (J.) posticatus (Wiedemann, 1821) [= ferox]. TYPE: Hol-
otype adult, locality and date not specified (NMW). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably 7 temporary rainpools or in overflow pools along streams in wooded
areas].
24. Psorophora J.) mexicana (Bellardi, 1859). TYPE: §, locality and
date not specified, Salle (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary
rainpools in wooded areas].
25. Psorophora (J.) totonaci Lassmann, 1951. TYPE: Holotype o, Cerro
Guzman, Veracruz (Veracruz), 19 June 1946, G. Lassmann (USNM, 61293).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in shaded rainpools. |
26. Psorophora (J.) varipes (Coquillett, 1904). TYPE: Lectotype 2,
Las Penas [Puerto Vallarta] (Jalisco), 18 July 1903, A. Dugés (USNM, 7341).
BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in temporary rain and floodwater pools in
wooded areas}.
27. Psorophora (Grabhamia) toltecum Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= confinnis].
TYPE: Holotype ? (286), Tehuantepec (Oaxaca), 29 June 1905, F. Knab
(USNM, 9973; see Stone and Knight 1955: 286). BIONOMICS: Larvae in tem-
porary ground pools of a variety of types.
36 Contr. “Amer, Ent? Inst..,: vol. 1) no. 5; 1965
28. Psorophora (G.) pruinosa Martini, 1935. TYPE: Lectotype 2, Torreon
(Coahuila), 6 June 1927, A. Dampf (BM; selection of Mattingly 1955: 28). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary ground pools]. Adults attracted to
light in cotton field.
29. Psorophora (G.) signipennis (Coquillett, 1904). TYPE: Lectotype &,
Monterrey (Nuevo Leon), date not specified, J. Goldberger (USNM, 8029; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1955: 286). BIONOMICS: Larvae in temporary
ground pools. Lectotype bred from larva.
30. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) argentescens Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= angustivitta-
tus]. TYPE: Lectotype o (441.4), Cordoba (Veracruz), 20 Jan or 8 Apr 1908,
F. Knab (USNM, 11965; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 214). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in temporary ground pools of a variety of types.
31. Aedes (O.) cuneatus Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= angustivittatus]. TYPE:
Lectotype ¢ (422.19) with associated 2 larval and 1 pupal skins, Cordoba
(Veracruz), 20 Jan 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11964; selection of Stone and Knight
1956a: 216). BIONOMICS: Larvae in temporary puddles.
32. Aedes (O.) rozeboomi Vargas, 1941 [= bimaculatus]. TYPE: o, 2,
state of Campeche, date not specified (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in deep temporary rainpools open to the sun].
33. Aedes (O.) muelleri Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Lectotype &* with genitalia
slide (1253), México (D. F.), date not specified, J. Miiller (USNM, 22826; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 222). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in tree-
holes].
*34. Aedes (O.) purpureipes Aitken, 1941. TYPE: Holotype 2 (5155), Tri-
unfo (Baja California Sur), 7 July 1938, A. E. Michelbacher and E. S. Ross
(CAS). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes]. Holotype taken at night.
35. Aedes (O.) shannoni Vargas & Downs, 1950. TYPE: Holotype ? with
associated larval and pupal skins, Gabriel Mariaca (Morelos), 10 June 1948,
W. G. Downs (ISET). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a muddy pool in a stream bed of
a running intermittent stream.
*36. Aedes (O.) taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann, 1821). TYPE: 9, locality, date
and collector not specified (NMW). BIONOMICS: | Larvae mostly in coastal salt
marshes or freshwater pools near the sea. Females bite at all times of day].
37. Aedes (Finlaya) epactius Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= atropalpus]. TYPE:
Lectotype ¢ (416.25), associated pupal skin missing, Cordoba (Veracruz), 18
Feb 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11963; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 217).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in holes or hollows in boulders in stream beds.
38. Aedes (F.) knabi (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype 2 (291 A) with
associated pupal skin, Tehuantepec (Oaxaca), 1 July 1905, F. Knab (USNM,
8289; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 220). BIONOMICS: Larvae in tree-
holes.
39. Aedes (F.) kompi Vargas & Downs, 1950. TYPE: Holotype ?, Tepozt-
lan (Morelos), 29 June 1947, W. G. Downs (ISET). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
treeholes and rockholes. :
40. Aedes (F.) ramirezi Vargas & Downs, 1950. TYPE: Holotype ?, Ga-
briel Mariaca (Morelos), 29 June 1947, W. G. Downs (ISET). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in rockholes.
41. Haemagogus (Longipalpifer) affirmatus (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= equinus].
TYPE: Lectotype ?, Salina Cruz (Oaxaca), 15 July 1905, F. Knab (USNM,
10023; selection of Dyar 1921: 103; see Stone and Knight 1955: 287). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in treeholes.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes ot
42. Haemagogus (L.) philosophicus (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= equinus]. TYPE:
Lectotype larval skin (295b), Tehuantepec (Oaxaca), 1 July 1905, F. Knab
(USNM; selection of Dyar 1921: 103; see Stone and Knight 1955: 288-289). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
43. Haemagogus (Stegoconops) gorgasi Galindo & Trapido, 1956 [ssp. of
mesodentatus]. TYPE: Holotype 2 (01591) with associated larval and pupal
skins, Tapachula (Chiapas), 4 Aug 1953 (GML). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in tree-
holes]. Holotype bred from egg of female biting man at above date.
44. Haemagogus (S.) alticola Galindo, Trapido & Boshell-Manrique in Galin-
do & Trapido 1956 [ssp. of mesodentatus]. TYPE: Holotype ? (01920) with as-
sociated larval and pupal skins, summit of Sumidero Canyon of the Rio Grijal-
va, 24 km north of Tuxtla Gutierrez (Chiapas), elev. 4000 ft, 29 June 1953,
(GML). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes]. Holotype bred from egg of female
biting man at above date.
45. Culiseta (C.) dugesi Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= particeps]. TYPE: Lecto-
type @, Guanajuato (Guanajuato), 20 Jan 1905, A. Duges (USNM, 9962; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
stream pools, overflows of streams, ponds and springs].
*46. Culex (Lutzia) bigoti Bellardi, 1862. TYPE: Holotype ¢, locality and
date not specified, Sallé (BC). _BIONOMICS: [Larvae in rockholes at stream
margins, ground pools, artificial containers].
47. Culex (Neoculex) derivator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Larva, Cordo-
ba (Veracruz), 13 June 1905, F. Knab (NE; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 47).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in pools in rocky stream beds. |
48. Culex (Culex) lactator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= corniger]. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (270i) with associated pupal skin, o and genitalia slide (226),
Rincon Antonio [Matias Romero] (Oaxaca), 23 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae in puddles.
49. Culex (C.) mooseri Vargas & Martinez Palacios, 1954 [ssp. of coro-
nator]. TYPE: Holotype & (4022-1) with genitalia slide, Campeche (Campeche),
June-July 1941, M. Macias Gomez (ISET). BIONOMICS: Larvae in rockpools.
Holotype bred from larva.
50. Culex (C.) proclamator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= declarator|]. TYPE:
Lectotype larval skin (262 p) with associated pupal skin and , Santa Lucrecia
[Jess Carranza] (Veracruz), 19 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957a: 55).. BIONOMICS: Larvae in shaded ground pools and
in artificial container.
51. Culex (C.) federalis Dyar, 1923 [= erythrothorax|]. TYPE: Lectotype ¢
with genitalia slide (1821), Xochimilco (D.F.), summer 1923, R. Balanzario
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 50). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in shallow ponds containing heavy growths of vegetation].
52. Culex (C.) interrogator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larval
skin (270 y) with associated pupal skin and &, skins and genitalia on slide
(231), Rincén Antonio [Matias Romero] (Oaxaca), 23 June 1905, F. Knab
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 51). BIONOMICS: Larvae in pool
of very foul water among bones and rubbish.
53. Culex (C.) factor Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= nigripalpus|. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (296 s) with pupal skin and " genitalia both on slide (234),
Tehuantepec (Oaxaca), 3 July 1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 49). BIONOMICS: Larvae in small puddles.
54. Culex (C.) eumimetes Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= peus]. TYPE: Lectotype ¢
(437.6), Orizaba (Veracruz), 16 Mar 1907, F. Knab (USNM, 11971; selection
38 Contr... Amer, Ent, Inst.; vol. 7,.mo.°9, 1965
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 49). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a puddle of drainage
water in the suburbs of the city.
55. Culex (C.) pinarocampa Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype “, Rio
San Antonio, Cordoba (Veracruz), 31 Jan 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11968; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957a: 55). BIONOMICS: Larvae in holes in rocks along
the river. Lectotype reared from pupa.
56. Culex (C.) penafieli Williston in Sanchez, 1886 [= pipiens quinquefas-
ciatus]. TYPE: %, 9, Mexico (D.F.), date and collector not specified (LU).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in foul water of artificial containers, ditches and
ground pools].
57. Culex (C.) dipseticus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= pipiens pallens]. TYPE: ©,
Salina Cruz (Oaxaca), Acapulco (Guerrero), La Paz (Baja California Sur), dates
and collectors not cited; also from Indio and Coachella, California, U. S. A.
(USNM; not cited in Stone and Knight 1957a). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably as
for penafieli].
58. Culex (C.) stenolepis Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype “ (431. 9)
with genitalia slide (780), Cordoba (Veracruz), 17 or 21 Mar 1908, F. Knab
(USNM, 119'70; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in epiphytic bromeliads, 20-50 ft from ground.
59. Culex (Melanoconion) conspirator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype
larval skin (312f) with associated pupal skin and 2, Almoloya (Oaxaca), 21 July
1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a large pothole beside a stream with clear water and dead leaves.
60. Culex (Mel.) gravitator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Larvae (261), val-
ley above Cordoba (Veracruz), 14 June 1905, 1907, F. Knab (NE; see. Stone
and Knight 1957a: 50). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads in a thicket.
61. Culex (Mel.) investigator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= inhibitator]. TYPE:
Larva (265), along railroad track 3 miles from Santa Lucrecia ih esus Carran-
za| (Veracruz), 20 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM; material in collection of doubt-
ful association and in poor condition, see Stone and Knight 1957a: 51). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in reedy pool beside a railroad track.
62. Culex (Mel.) mutator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype lagnal skin
with associated pupal skin, o (259 b) and genitalia slide, Cordoba (Veracruz),
11 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM: selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 53). BIO-
- NOMICS: Larvae in rockpools of a stream bed.
63. Culex (Mochlostyrax) pilosus (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype
larval skin (267 b) with associated pupal skin and o’, Santa Lucrecia [Jesus
Carranza| (Veracruz), 21 June 1905, F. Knab (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 54). BIONOMICS: Larvae in holes made by horse's feet in mud
at the margin of a Swampy area of a river.
64. Culex (Microculex) rejector Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Larvae, Cor-
doba (Veracruz), 14 June 1905, F. Knab (NE; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 55).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in a large bromeliad.
65. Culex (Micr.) restrictor Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype larval
skin (311 c) with associated whole pupa (2) on slide, ravine at Almoloya (Oaxa-
ca), 21 July 1905, F. Knab (USNM; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 55). BIONO-
MICS: Larva in small treehole.
66. Culex (Micr.) consternator Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= restrictor]. TYPE:
Lectotype o (429.1), Cordoba (Veracruz), 7 Mar 1908, F. Knab (USNM, 11969;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). .BIONOMICS: Larvae in treehole.
67. Deinocerites howardi Belkin & Hogue, 1959. TYPE: Holotype <, Las
Penas [Puerto Vallarta] (Jalisco), 10 May 1903, A. Dugés (USNM, 64264). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in crabholes].
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 39
68. Deinocerites mcdonaldi Belkin & Hogue, 1959. TYPE: Holotype &
(119-116) with associated larval and pupal skins, near a road at Matanchen, near
San Blas (Nayarit), 26 June 1956, W. A. McDonald (USNM, 64263). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in crabholes, of 2-6 inches diameter, in a mangrove area.
69. Corethrella izquierdoi Vargas, 1952. TYPE: Holotype * (6251), Teno-
sique (Tabasco), Apr 1941, L. Vargas (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in dense swamps or treeholes]. Holotype taken in light trap.
70. Corethrella laneana Vargas, 1946. TYPE: Holotype & (3792), Monterrey
(Nuevo Leon), June 1944, M. Macfas (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in dense swamps].
71. Corethrella whartoni Vargas, 1952. TYPE: Holotype “ (6249), Comalcal-
co (Tabasco), Sept 1946, M. Macias (ISET). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
dense swamps or treeholes].
List of Localities
BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR
La Paz: 57. Culex (C.) dipseticus.
Triunfo: 34. Aedes (O.) purpureipes.
CAMPECHE
Campeche: 49. Culex (C.) mooseri.
Locality not specified: 32. Aedes (O.) rozeboomi.
CHIAPAS
El Naranjo, road to ruins of Palenque: 16. Sabethes (S.) ortizi.
San Crist6bal de las Casas: 4. Anopheles (A.) cricillium; 5. Anopheles (A.)
parapunctipennis.
Sumidero Canyon, summit (elev. 4000 ft), Rio Grijalva, 24 km north of
Tuxtla Gutierrez: 44. Haemagogus (S.) alticola.
Tapachula: 43. Haemagogus (S. ) gorgasi.
CHIHUAHUA
Ciudad Juarez: 6. Anopheles (A. ) willardi.
COAHUILA
Torreon: 28. Psorophora (G.) pruinosa.
DISTRITO FEDERAL
Mexico: 33. Aedes (O.) muelleri; 56. Culex (C.) penafieli.
Valle de México, elev. 2250 m: 1. Anopheles (A.) aztecus.
Xochimilco: 51. Culex (C.) federalis.
GUANAJUATO :
Guanajuato: 45. Culiseta (C.) dugesi.
GUERRERO
Acapulco: 57. Culex (C.) dipseticus.
Omilteme, cattle ranch about 15-18 miles WNW of Chilpancingo (see Gold-
man, Smiths. Misc. Coll. 115: 152-153, 1951), elev. 8000 ft: 11. Toxorhyn-
chites (L.) grandiosus.
JALISCO
Puerto Vallarta (formerly Las Pefias): 26. Psorophora WJ.) varipes; 67.
Deinocerites howardi.
40 “Conte. Amer: Ent. Thet. vol. 1) no. s5, £965
MEXICO (Locality not specified)
All the species without specific localities were probably collected in the
state of Veracruz, at or near either Veracruz or Coatzacoalcos (Puerto Mexi-
co): 12: Toxorhynchites (L.) longipes; 23. Psorophora (J.) posticatus; 24.
Psorophora UJ.) mexicana; 36. Aedes (O.) taeniorhynchus.
MORELOS
Gabriel Mariaca: 35. Aedes (O.) shannoni; 40. Aedes (F.) ramirezi.
Tepoztlan: 39. Aedes (F.) kompi.
NA YARIT
San Blas: 68. Deinocerites mcdonaldi.
NUEVO LEON
Monterrey: 8. Anopheles (A.) stonei; 29. Psorophora (G. ) aimee 70.
Corethrella laneana.
OAXACA
Almoloya: 19. Psorophora (P.) virescens; 59. Culex (Mel. ) conspirator;
65. Culex (Micr.) restrictor.
Matias Romero (formerly Rincon Antonio): 48. Culex (C.) lactator; 52. Cu-
lex (C.) interrogator.
Salina Cruz: 41. Haemagogus (L.) affirmatus; 57. Culex (C.) dipseticus.
Tehuantepec: 27. Psorophora (G. ) toltecum; 38. Aedes (F.) knabi; abi: 42. H Hae
magogus (L.) philosophicus; 53. Culex (C.) factor factor.
SAN LUIS POTOSI
Tamazunchale: 2. Anopheles (A.) fausti.
SINA LOA
Mazatlan: 21. Psorophora (P.) stonei.
SONORA
Valle del Yaqui: 20. Psorophora (P.) simplex.
TABASCO
Comalcalco, ca. 18° 15' 57" N, 93° 25' W: 71. Corethrella whartoni.
Poana, Teapa: 15. Wyeomyia (W.) stonei.
Tenosique: 3. Anopheles (A.) gabaldoni; 69. Corethrella izquierdoi.
TAMAULIPAS
Altamira, Ciudad Mante [as El Mante], Gonzalez: 9. Anopheles (N.) bisig-
natus. :
Tampico: 9. Anopheles (N.) bisignatus; 10. Anopheles (N.) trisignatus.
VERACRUZ
Cordoba: 7. Anopheles (A.) strigimacula; 13. Wyeomyia (W.) abebela; 14.
Wyeomyia (W.) ablabes; 18. Uranotaenia basalis; 30. Aedes (O.) argentes-
cens; 31. Aedes (O.) cuneatus; 37. Aedes (F.) epactius; 46. Culex (L. ) bigoti;
ac Cue. (N.) derivator; 55. Culex (C.) pinarocampa (Rio San Antonio; 58.
Culex (C.) stenolepis; 60. Culex (Mel.) gravitator; 62. Culex (Mel. ) mutator:
64. Culex (Micr.) rejector; 66. Culex (Micr.) consternator.
Guzman (Cerro), municipality of Veracruz: 25. Psorophora (J.) totonaci.
Jesus Carranza (formerly Santa Lucrecia): 17. Uranotaenia coatzacoalcos;
50. Culex (C.) proclamator; 61. Culex (Mel.) investigator; 63. Culex (Mochl. )
pilosus.
Orizaba: 54. Culex (C.) eumimetes.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 41
San Jeronimo, Laguna de Tamiahua: 9. Anopheles (N.) bisignatus.
Tempoal: 22. Psorophora (J.) pisces.
MIDDLE AMERICA
List of Species
1. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) longipes (Fabricius, 1805). TYPE: Adult,
"Habitat in America meridionali Dom. Smidt Mus. Dom. Lund'' (ZMC). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils and/or flower bracts of Araceae, Mu-
saceae and bromeliads; possibly in treeholes].
2. Sabethes (S.) cyaneus (Fabricius, 1805). TYPE: Adult, "Habitat in
America meridionali Dom. Smidt Mus. Dom. Lund" (ZMC). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in treeholes and bamboo with small lateral openings; bamboo traps of
this type should be used].
3. Psorophora (P.) cilipes (Fabricius, 1805). TYPE: Adults, "Habitat in
America meridionali Dom. Smidt Mus. Dom. de Sehestedt"’ (ZMC). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae in temporary rainpools choked by vegetation in the forest].
4. Psorophora (Grabhamia) cingulata (Fabricius, 1805). TYPE: 2 adults,
"Habitat in America meridionali Dom. Smidt Mus. Dom. de Sehestedt" (ZMC).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in open temporary rainpools].
5. Aedes (Stegomyia) fasciatus (Fabricius, 1805) [= aegypti]. TYPE:
Adult, "Habitat in Americae Insulis Mus. Dom. Lund”, probably from St.
Croix, Virgin Islands (ZMC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in domestic artificial
containers].
6. Aedes (Stegomyia) frater (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827) [= aegypti]. TYPE:
o, "Habitat in insulis Americae”’, probably Martinique (NE). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in domestic artificial containers]. |
List of Localities
The country of origin of the above species is not definitely known. How-
ever, we have provisionally selected type localities for these species on the
grounds indicated below.
FRENCH GUIANA
The 4 Fabrician species originating from "America meridionali’’ are
stated to have come from Smidt. Ella Zimsen (The type material of I. C. Fa-
bricius, Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1964: 14) indicates that on old well-pre-
served original labels from the Sehestedt and Lund collections the name is
spelled Schmidt and that in the 1780's a surgeon, Johan Christian Schmidt,
and a customs-house officer, Adam Levin Smidt, both lived on St. Croix,
then a Danish possession. On the basis of the evidence of the original la-
bels we consider that the material came from the surgeon. The majority of
the species involved do not occur on the island of St. Croix or in the Les-
ser Antilles and furthermore the locality "America meridionali'' probably in-
dicates the South American continent. The only contemporary Danish zoologi-
cal expedition to this area appears to be that of Julius Rohr (Zimsen, loc. cit.)
from the Danish West Indies. Some of the material collected by Rohr came
from Cayenne, French Guiana, including Toxorhynchites (L.) haemarrhorda-
lis described by Fabricius. It seems probable that some of the material col-
lected on this expedition came into the hands of the surgeon, Johan C. Schmidt,
42 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
and eventually was deposited in the Sehestedt- Lund collections. As the only
recorded specific locality of material from this expedition is that of Cayenne
we chose this as the type locality of the following species: 1. Trichoprosopon
(R.) longipes; 2. Sabethes (S.) cyaneus; 3. Psorophora (P.) cilipes; 4. Pso-
rophora (G.) cingulata.
MARTINIQUE
Robineau-Desvoidy's material probably came from the French West Indies
and we select Martinique as the type locality because this island was under
French control during this period: 6. Aedes (S.) frater.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
The most likely source for the Fabrician material of the ubiquitous aegypti
we consider to be the principal island of the Danish West Indies, St. Croix,
where J. C. Schmidt resided (see French Guiana above): 5. Aedes (S.) fas-
ciatus.
NICARAGUA
List of Species
1. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) hypoptes (Knab, 1907) [= theobaldi]. TYPE:
Holotype o, Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10146). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
probably in treeholes].
2. Trichoprosopon (Shannoniana) schedocyclium (Dyar & Knab, 1908). TYPE:
Lectotype °, Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 11974; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957b: 119). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Araceae,
possibly in bamboo internodes]. Adults collected in "interior of Nicaragua"
probably upriver from Bluefields. |
3. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) leucopus (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10003; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957b: 118). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Araceae,
Marantaceae and Musaceae].
4. Trichoprosopon (R.) ulopus (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= longipes]. TYPE:
Holotype 2, Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10004). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in leaf axils and/or flower bracts of Araceae, Marantaceae and/or
Musaceae].
5. Aedes (Finlaya) thorntoni Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= terrens]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10143: see Stone and Knight 1956a:
225). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes and possibly broken bamboo].
6. Aedes (Howardina) septemstriatus Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype
@ (8), Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10144; see Stone and Knight 1956a:
225). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
7. Culex (Melanoconion) taeniopus Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotne “.
Bluefields, W. F. Thornton (USNM, 10260). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
ground waters with high organic content; larvae presumably of this species
have been collected in rockpools along the course of a stream and eonta inane
dead leaves and flower petals].
8. Deinocerites tetraspathus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= cancer]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2 with genitalia slide (472), Bluefields, no other data (USNM, 12109; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in crabholes].
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 43
List of Localities
All the species originally described from Nicaragua are labeled Bluefields
and were probably collected both on the coast and in interior upriver from
Bluefields.
PANAMA AND CANAL ZONE
List of Species
1. Chagasia bathana (Dyar in Curry, 1928). TYPE: Holotype ¢, near Gatun
(Canal Zone), 27 Dec 1927, C. H. Bath (USNM, 40859). BIONOMICS: Larvae
and pupae among grass stems in narrow channels of swiftly flowing streams
below rapids or falls, occasionally in quieter backwaters of the rapids or falls
or in the sluggish streams below. [The larvae can be collected throughout the
year but are most abundant during the rainy season (Arnett 1947: 187)]. Holo-
type bred from larva.
2. Anopheles (Stethomyia) kompi Edwards, 1930. TYPE: Holotype &, Al-
mirante (Bocas del Toro), Feb 1928, W. H. W. Komp (USNM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in very slow moving, drying streams or in pools left by drying streams
in iad jungles. Apparently they are associated with an alga (Arnett 1947:
188) |.
3. Anopheles (A.) niveopalpis Ludlow, 1919 [= eiseni]. TYPE: Holotype °,
Camacho Reservoir, Empire (Canal Zone), 28 July 1928 (USNM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in shaded pools beside streams and in woods, in open treeholes and
broken bamboo, and in coconut husks].
4. Anopheles (A.) neomaculipalpus Curry, 1931. TYPE: o%, 2, larva and
pupa, near Gatun (Canal Zone) and in the flat coastal savannas east of Panama
City (Panama), no other data (LU). BIONOMICS: Larvae in cattle tracks ex-
posed to the sun in low lying marshy pastures.
5. Anopheles (A.) chiriquiensis Komp, 1936 [= parapunctipennis]._ TYPE:
Lectotype & with genitalia slide, Volcan de Chiriqui (Chiriqui), elev. 6500 ft,
7 Feb 1935, W. H. W. Komp (USNM, 51882; selection of Stone and Knight
1956b: 277). BIONOMICS: Larvae and pupae in cold spring among rocks
(about 57 F). Adults in hollow trees and under stream banks.
6. Anopheles (A.) punctimacula Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype
adult, Colon (Colon), 2 Feb 1904, W. M. Black (USNM, 9979). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in swift or drying streams, ponds, ditches, rivers and seepage areas;
abundant throughout the year. Adults in native houses during the day, abun-
dant at screens at night, will bite man even during the day (Arnett 1947: 193)].
7. Anopheles (A.) malefactor Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= punctimacula]. TYPE:
Lectotype ¢ (136.1) with associated larval skin (portion of abdomen) and pupal
skin, upper Rio Chagres (Panama), 7 June 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10877; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 278). BIONOMICS: Larvae in still pool of
drying mountain spring.
8. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) gorgasi Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= albimanus].
TYPE: Holotype °, La Boca (Canal Zone), date not specified, A. H. Jennings
(USNM, 10863). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in vegetation in open sunlit ground
waters]. _
9. Anopheles (N.) anomalophyllus Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype ~ with
genitalia slide, Wenham's farm, near Almirante (Bocas del Toro), Feb 1927,
44 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. , vol: 1, no. 5, 1965
W. H. W. Komp (USNM). BIONOMICS: Pupae in a shaded running spring.
Holotype bred from pupa.
10. Anopheles (N.) aquasalis Curry, 1932. TYPE: o with genitalia slide,
° and larva, Atlantic side of Canal Zone (no type locality cited although Colon
and Cristdbal are mentioned), date not specified, D. P. Curry et al (LU). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in brackish water in areas where the tide has at least occa-
sional access (tidal flats, coastal swamps), 3-66.8 per cent sea water, pre-
ferring shaded places.
11. Anopheles (N.) lloydi Unti, 1941 [var. of evansae]. TYPE: Holotype
egg, Panama, locality not specified (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in small
marshy areas with considerable vegetation, in marshy margins of clear fresh-
water pools, streams and lakes].
12. Anopheles (N.) aquacaelestis Curry, 1932 [= oswaldoi]. TYPE: & with
genitalia slide, 2 and larva, Atlantic side of Canal Zone (no type locality is
cited although Colon Hospital (20 June 1929) and lower Chagres River men-
tioned), D. P. Curry et al (LU). BIONOMICS: Larvae in fresh water pools
"far above the reach of the tides, preferring shaded locations. Adult "not
prone to seek out human habitations, or else its flight range is limited"; fe-
males "'taken with sweep-net, and also in the act of attacking, in. . . densely
shaded jungle swamps... ."' :
13. Anopheles (Kerteszia) neivai Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913. TYPE: Lec-
totype 2 (344.1) with associated larval head capsule and pupal skin, Fort San
Felipe, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 2 June 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 20440;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 279). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic
bromeliads. [Larvae in wild pineapple, Ananas magdalenae. Adults will bite
humans (Komp 1937: 503, 523)]. | |
14. Anopheles (K.) hylephilus Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= neivai]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2, Gatun (Canal Zone), Feb 1917, L. H. Dunn (USNM, 21065; by PRES-
ENT SELECTION). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bromeliads]. Adult taken in
"quarters."
15. Trichoprosopon (T.) trichorryes (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= compressum].
TYPE: Lectotype & (30.2) with associated larval and pupal skins, near Taber-
nilla (Canal Zone), May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10847; selection of Stone 1944:
338). BIONOMICS: Eggs laid in prepared bamboo joint, 1 May, larvae and pu-
pae developed, first adult issued 14 May. Adults approach to bite, but it is
doubtful if they ever do so, or at least commonly. Lectotype reared from egg.
16. Trichoprosopon (T.) mogilasium (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [var. of com-
pressum|]. TYPE: Lectotype 9 (45.1) with associated larval and pupal skins,
Tabernilla (Canal Zone), May 1907, A. Buseck (USNM, 10848; selection of
Stone 1944: 338). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo joints.
17. Trichoprosopon (T.) wilsoni Ludlow, 1918 [= digitatum]. TYPE: o and
larva, Chagres Camp, Las Cascadas (Canal Zone), 1 Dec, W. H. Wilson (LU).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in coconut shell, predaceous on the ''young" of other spe-
cies or smaller members of their own species. :
18. Trichoprosopon (Isostomyia) espini (Martini, 1914). TYPE: Holotype ,
3 different localities given: near Corozal, Miraflores Lake and Culebra (Canal
Zone), Nov 1913, E. Martini (BMNH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in leaf axils of
aroid Monotrichardia arborescens on Atlantic side (Galindo, Carpenter and
Trapido 1951: 129)].
19. Trichoprosopon (I.) shropshirei Ludlow, 1920 [= espini]. TYPE: Lec-
totype, Camp Gaillard (Canal Zone), 23 July 1919 (USNM, 27803; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 119, locality on label as Ancon). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
probably as in espini above]. |
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 2 45
20. Trichoprosopon (Ctenogoeldia) dicellaphora (Howard, Dyar & Knab,
1913) [= magnum]. TYPE: Lectotype o (476.3) with genitalia slide (1763), Mi-
raflores (Canal Zone), 8 Feb 1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12708; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 118). BIONOMICS: Larvae in flower bracts of maran-
taceous plant, Calathea discolor, presumably feeding on larvae of Wyeomyia.
21. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) lampropus (Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913).
TYPE: Lectotype with genitalia slide, Upper Pequeni River (Panama), 30
Mar 1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12709; selection of Stone 1944: 34). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in fallen palm spathe, predaceous, feeding upon larvae and
pupae of T. digitatum.
22. Trichoprosopon (R.) culicivora (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= longipes].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 28 Apr 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10849). BIONOMICS: Larvae in red flower bracts of Heliconia, predaceous on
Wyeomyia galoa larvae. Holotype bred from larva.
23. Wyeomyia (W.) panamena Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= arthrostigma]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 22 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in bamboo joints and ''other similar locations.'' Holotype bred
from pupa.
24, Wyeomyia (W.) chrysomus (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= celaenocephala].
TYPE: Holotype “, native village near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 25 June 1907,
A. Busck (USNM, 10854). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad. Hol-
otype bred from larva.
25. Wyeomyia (W.) philophone (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= celaenocephala].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 25 Jan or 10 July 1907 (no indica-
* tion in Stone and Knight 1957b: 125 of the correct date), A. Busck (USNM,
10852). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliad Tillandsia. Holotype bred from
larva.
26. Wyeomyia (W.) charmion Dyar, 1928. TYPE: Holotype o, near Gatun,
at head of Stream No. 7, Agua Clara Reservoir (Canal Zone), Jan 1928, C. H.
Bath (USNM, 41103). BIONOMICS: Larva in leaves of wild pineapple (Ananas_
magdalenae).
27. Wyeomyia (W.) codiocampa Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype ¢&
(461) with genitalia slide (362), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 9 May 1907, A. Busck
(USNM, 10853; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in bamboo joint, cut and prepared. Adults in bamboo woods "where they came
to bite."'.
*28. Wyeomyia (W.) florestan Dyar, 1925. TYPE: Holotype c, Fort
Clayton (Canal Zone), 17 Jan 1925, D. Baker (USNM). BIONOMICS: [One lar-
va in treehole (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951: 130)].
29. Wyeomyia (W.) hosautos Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype °, Ta-
bernilla (Canal Zone), date not specified, A. Busck (USNM, 10860). BIONO-
MICS: Pupa in bamboo joint. Holotype bred from pupa.
*30. Wyeomyia (W.) symmachus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= hosautos]. TYPE:
Lectotype ? (326), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 23 May 1908, A. H. Jennings
(USNM, 12056; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in bamboo joints. Lectotype bred from larva. :
31. Wyeomyia (W.) euethes Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= hosautos]. TYPE: Holo-
type ¢, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 10 May 1906, A. Busck (USNM, 12134). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo joints. Holotype bred from larva.
32. Wyeomyia (W.) melanopus Dyar, 1919. TYPE: Holotype o (119), Por-
tobelo (Colon), 2 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 22005). BIONOMICS: Larva
in bromeliad on a fallen tree. Holotype bred from larva.
46 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
33. Wyeomyia (W.) culebrae Dyar, 1923 [= melanopus]. TYPE: Holotype
@, Culebra (Canal Zone), 1918, L. H. Dunn (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in bromeliads]. |
34. Wyeomyia (W.) rolonca Dyar & Knab, 1910 [= mitchellii]. TYPE: Hol-
otype o, Upper Pequeni River, 2 miles up the Rio Juanita (Panama), 24 Mar
1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12745). BIONOMICS: Larva in epiphytic bro-
meliad. Holotype bred from larva. |
35. Wyeomyia (W.) labesba Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= mitchellii].
TYPE: Lectotype larval skin (471.1) with associated @ (471), Tabernilla (Ca-
nal Zone), 4 Feb 1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12702; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ''wild pineapple plants” along edge
of swampy pasture.
36. Wyeomyia (W.) nigritubus Galindo, Carpenter & Trapido, 1951. TYPE:
Holotype “ with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, La Vic-
toria, Cerro Azul (Panama), elev. 2100 ft, 27 Apr 1950 (USNM). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in bamboo internode trap 5 ft above forest floor.
37. Wyeomyia (W.) scotinomus (Dyar & Knab, 1907). TYPE: Lectotype o
(103.1) with associated larval head and pupal skin and genitalia slide (438),
Boqueron River (Panama), 23 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10855; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad
Tillandsia. |
38. Wyeomyia (W.) homothe Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= scotinomus]. TYPE:
Holotype , near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), date not specified, A. Busck (USNM,
10859). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliad Tillandsia]. The adults
were collected in bamboo woods in the act of biting.
39. Wyeomyia (W.) leucopisthepus Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= scotinomus].
TYPE: Holotype &, associated larval and pupal skin not preserved, near Ta-
bernilla (Canal Zone), 10 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10861). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia.
40. Wyeomyia (W.) abrachys Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= scotinomus]. TYPE:
Lectotype * (119.3) with associated larval skin and genitalia slide (436), Cal-
dera Island, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 2 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12133;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 120). _BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic
bromeliad on fallen tree.
41. Wyeomyia (W.) chresta Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= scotinomus]. TYPE:
Lectotype 0 (216.3) with associated larval head capsule and genitalia slide
(439), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 22 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 12135; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS: "Bred from [bromeliad]
Tillandsia on a calabash tree near the railroad station in Tabernilla."' |
42. Wyeomyia (W.) hapla Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= scotinomus]. TYPE: Holo-
type ¢, Caldera Island, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 4 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings
(USNM, 12102). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad on fallen tree.
Holotype bred from larva.
43. Wyeomyia (W.) incana Dyar, 1922 [= scotinomus]. TYPE: Lectotype
with genitalia slide (1711), Margarita (Canal Zone), 12 Aug 1922, J. B. Shrop-
shire (USNM, 25759; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). _BIONOMICS:
Larvae in wild pineapple plants. Lectotype bred from larva.
44. Wyeomyia (W.) simmsi (Dyar & Knab, 1908). TYPE: Holotype ¢, Fort
San Felipe, Portobelo (Colon), 4 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 11976). BI-
ONOMICS: Larva in epiphytic bromeliad. Holotype bred from larva.
45. Wyeomyia (W.) dymodora Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= simmsi]. TYPE: Lec-
totype ¢ (157), Fort San Felipe, Portobelo (Colon), 21 Jan 1908, A.H. Jennings
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 47
(USNM, 11991; selection of Dyar and Knab, 1909: 266). BIONOMICS: Larva in
epiphytic bromeliad. Lectotype bred from larva.
46. Wyeomyia (W.) roloncetta Dyar, 1919 [= simmsi]. TYPE: Holotype ©,
old Fort San Felipe, Portobelo (Colon), 5 Mar 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM,
22027). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads. Holotype bred.
47. Wyeomyia (Davismyia) arborea Galindo, Carpenter & Trapido, 1951.
TYPE: Holotype ° with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide,
Bijao, Chiriqui Volcano (Chiriqui), elev. 3000 ft, 15 Aug 1950 (USNM). BIO-
NOMICS: Immatures in bamboo internode trap placed in upper canopy of for-
est. Adults biting man in forest canopy (30-45 ft). Holotype bred from egg.
*48. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) circumcincta Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lec-
totype & (191), native village near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 10 July 1907, A.
Busck (USNM, 10857; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia. Lectotype bred from larva.
49. Wyeomyia (D.) macrotus Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= circumcincta]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2 (104.1) with fragments of larval and pupal skins, Boqueron River
(Panama), 23 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10862; selection of Stone and Knight
1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia.
50. Wyeomyia (D.) andropus Dyar & Knab, 1908 [= circumcincta]. TYPE:
Lectotype & (133.2), Fort San Felipe, Portobelo (Colon), 4 Jan 1909, A. H.
Jennings (USNM, 11989; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 120). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in bromeliads.
51. Wyeomyia (D.) intonca Dyar & Knab, 1910 [= circumcincta]. TYPE: Ho-
lotype “, Empire, Camacho River (Canal Zone), 2 Mar 1909, A. H. Jennings
(USNM, 12744). BIONOMICS: Larva in epiphytic bromeliad on fallen tree. Ho-
lotype bred from larva.
*52. Wyeomyia (D.) clasoleuca Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype ?, Cal-
dera Island, Portobelo Bay (Colon), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM,
11990; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in broken bamboo].
53. Wyeomyia (D.) agyrtes Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= clasoleuca]. TYPE: Ho-
otype 2, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 16 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 12184). BI-
ONOMICS: Larva in bamboo stump.
54. Wyeomyia (D.) coenonus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913. TYPE: Lectotype
o (552.3) with genitalia slide (523), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 14 Apr 1909, A.
H. Jennings (USNM, 12705; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in flower bracts of marantaceous plant Calathea discolor.
55. Wyeomyia (D.) complosa (Dyar, 1928). TYPE: Lectotype & with geni-
talia slide (2285), San Juan de Pequenf (Panama), 11 Nov 1926, D. P. Curry
(USNM: selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
"skunk cabbage'' [Dieffenbachia, Araceae]. °
*56. Wyeomyia (D.) jocosa (Dyar & Knab, 1908). TYPE: Holotype ?, Cal-
dera Island, Portobelo Bay (Colon), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM,
11975). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in leaf axils of [marantaceous plant] Calathea
rN and [aroid] Xanthosoma violaceum (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951:
132)].
57. Wyeomyia (D.) prolepidis Dyar & Knab, 1919 [= jocosa]. TYPE: Lec-
totype (C-97), Culebra (Canal Zone), date not specified, L. H. Dunn (USNM;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in leaf axils
of [aroid] Dieffenbachia sp. (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951: 132)].
58. Wyeomyia (D.) canfieldi (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= melanocephala]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Lion Hill (Canal Zone), 7 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 18050).
48 Contr: Amer. Ent. Inst, vol, 1; no.°5, 1965
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Araceae]. Adults biting in
"shade of the brush."
599. Wyeomyia (D.) agnostips Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= melanocephala]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 3 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10858). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Araceae]. Adult biting
in bamboo woods.
*60. Wyeomyia (D.) pandora Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= melanocephala]. TYPE:
Lectotype “ (37) with genitalia slide (4421), Corozal (Canal Zone), 29 Nov
1907, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12132; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 125).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in Caladium leaf axil [aroid]. Lectotype bred from larva.
61. Wyeomyia (D.) fauna Dyar & Knab, 1919 [= melanocephala]. TYPE:
Lectotype o (1114) with genitalia slide, Bas Obispo (Canal Zone), Aug 1913,
J. Zetek (USNM, 21999; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Araceae].
62. Wyeomyia (D.) modalma Dyar, 1922 [= melanocephala]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2 (1921/V-15), Gatun (Canal Zone), 10 Dec 1921, J. B. Shropshire (USNM,
25256; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 124). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in leaf axils of Araceae].
63. Wyeomyia (D.) hemisiris (Dyar & Shannon, 1925) [= melanocephala].
TYPE: Holotype , France Field (Canal Zone), 16 Aug 1923, collector a native
assistant to J. B. Shropshire (USNM, 28210). BIONOMICS: Larva "possibly
from a coconut shell.’' Holotype bred from larva.
64. Wyeomyia (D.) phroso Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1915. TYPE: Holotype
°, Gatin (Canal Zone), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12704). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
*65. Wyeomyia (D.) proviolans (Dyar & Knab, 1919) [= phroso]. TYPE:
Lectotype o (1139) with genitalia slide, Portobelo (Col6n), 11 Mar 1907, A.
Busck (USNM, 22006; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS:
| Larvae probably in bromeliads].
66. Wyeomyia (D.) eloisa Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= pseudopecten].
TYPE: Lectotype o (476) with genitalia slide (505), Miraflores (Canal Zone),
8 Feb 1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12703; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b:
123). BIONOMICS: Larvae in "flower sheaths'' of Calathea discolor [Maran-
taceae|. The eggs are laid in the uppermost, just opening, and still dry flow-
er-sheaths, and hatch when moisture accumulates. This moisture is never
abundant and is always of a slimy nature. [No indication in original descrip-
tion whether these data would apply to lectotype or to other topotypic material,
3 different localities being cited].
*67. Wyeomyia (D.) onidus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= ulocoma]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (238.6) with associated larval skin and genitalia slide (356), Tabernilla
(Canal Zone), 12 Mar 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12055; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: Larvae in "flower cups" of a Heliconia
similar to H. champneiana.
68. Wyeomyia (D.) pantoia Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= ulocoma]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (238) with genitalia slide (442), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 12 Mar 1908,
A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12055; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 125). BIO-
NOMICS: The larvae live in the water in the flower cups of a species of Heli-
conia with upright flowers. Mr. Jennings obtained them several times in Hel-
iconia of the types of champneiana and luteofusca.
69. Wyeomyia (D.) cacodela Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= ulocoma]. TYPE: Lec-
totype “ (195), Gorgona (Canal Zone), 7 Feb 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM,
12183; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 121). BIONOMICS: Larvae in the
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 49
flower-cups of species of Heliconia of the type of H. acuminata. Lectotype
bred from larva.
*70. Wyeomyia (D.) ypsipola Dyar, 1922. TYPE: Holotype 0, Camacho (Ca-
nal Zone), 14 Jan 1922, J. B. Shropshire (USNM, 25257). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in ata ; [larvae in [aroid] Dieffenbachia (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido
1951; 1314)4. 3
71. Limatus cacophrades Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= durhamii]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (385.1) with associated larval and pupal skins, Tabernilla (Canal Zone),
date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12130; selection of Stone and Knight
1957b: 117). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo.
72. Sabethes (S.) tarsopus Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype ¢ (10413),
Bocas del Toro (Bocas del Toro), 28 Sept 1903, P. Osterhout (USNM, 11972;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 118). _BIONOMICS: [Eggs laid primarily
in January; one larva in bamboo trap; adults primarily arboreal (Galindo, Car-
penter and Trapido 1951: 134); larvae probably in bamboo internodes or tree-
holes with small lateral opening].
73. Sabethes (Sabethinus) identicus Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype 2
(51.2), near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10851). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo traps.
74. Mansonia (Rhynchotaenia) coticula (Dyar & Knab, 1907) [= arribalzagail,
TYPE: Lectotype ? (USDA 10417), Bocas del Toro (Bocas del Toro), 25 Sept
1903, P. Osterhout (USNM, 10281; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 198).
BIONOMICS: |Larvae probably on rootlets of grasses and other herbaceous
vegetation in mud and fine sediment in very shallow water on the margins of
swamps, ponds or streams].
75. Mansonia (R.) nigricans (Coquillett, 1904). TYPE: Lectotype ?, Pana-
ma, locality not specified, 18 Apr 1904, J. W. Ross (USNM, 7943; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957c: 198). BIONOMICS: [Larvae dipped from roots of
grass comprising floating island (Dyar 1928: 258)].
76. Uranotaenia calosomata Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype &
(23.8) with portion of associated larval skin, near Tabernilla (Canal Zone),
2 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10866; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c:
200). BIONOMICS: Larvae in deep hoof-prints in a swampy meadow; |has been
collected only in March (Arnett 1948: 175)].
77. Uranotaenia incognita Galindo, Blanton & Peyton, 1954. TYPE: Holo-
type &, David (Chiriqui), 13 Dec 1952 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters]. Adults collected in light
traps.
78. Uranotaenia paludosa Galindo, Blanton & Peyton, 1954. TYPE: Holo-
type o, Almirante (Bocas del Toro), 17 Apr 1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters]. Adults taken
in light traps.
79. Uranotaenia telmatophila Galindo, Blanton & Peyton, 1954. TYPE:
Holotype & with associated larval and pupal skins, Tocumen (Panama), Mar
1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae among matted roots of Euirena umbellata
Rottb. in a large open swamp; found in relative abundance during the dry sea-
son, virtually disappear from the breeding places during the rainy season
months. Adults taken in light traps near extensive freshwater swamps.
80. Uranotaenia trapidoi Galindo, Blanton & Peyton, 1954. TYPE: Holo-
type & with associated larval and pupal skins, El Hato (Chiriqui), elev. 4500
ft, 17 May (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in partly shaded, cold, mountain
springs.
50 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
81. Uranotaenia typhlosomata Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype , Ta-
boga Island Pay 27 Apr 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 10918). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in a still pool in a small stream and in holes along this stream
which were more or less open crevices under rocks, inhabited by crabs, about
a quarter of a mile from the beach, at a good elevation. The adult mosquitoes
were hiding in large crevices among the rocks in the immediate vicinity of the
holes. The water was fresh. Holotype bred from larva.
82. Orthopodomyia phyllozoa (Dyar & Knab, 1907). TYPE: Holotype <,
native village near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 25 June 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10864). Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
83. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) hastatus Dyar, 1922. TYPE: Holotype o, Paitilla
(Panama), 17 Dec 1921, J. B. Shropshire (USNM, 25212). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in ground pools. Holotype bred from larva.
84. Aedes (O.) polyagrus Dyar, 1918 [= serratus]. TYPE: Holotype & with
associated larval skin (dried out), Taboga Island (Panama), 1 July 1907, A.
Busck (USNM, 21551). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary ground
pools and flooded edges of forested swamps].
85. Aedes (Finlaya) clarki Galindo, Carpenter & Trapido, 1953 [ssp. of
leucocelaenus]. TYPE: Holotype & with associated larval and pupal skins and
genitalia slide, Tucue (Cocle), 5 Sept 1950 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in treeholes|. Parent ? biting man in forest. Holotype bred from egg.
86. Aedes (F.) leucotaeniatus Komp, 1938. TYPE: Holotype o with geni-
talia slide (1689), Camacho (Canal Zone), 22 Apr 1922, J. B. Shropshire
(USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bamboo traps on slopes of forested hills
(Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951: 120)]. ae
87. Aedes (F.) lithoecetor Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype ? (101.5),
larval and pupal skins missing, upper Rio Chagres between Alhajuela and San
Juan (Panama), 20 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10868; selection of Stone and
Knight 1956a: 220). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a pot-hole in a rock at edge of
river.
88. Haemagogus (H.) argyromeris Dyar & Ludlow, 1921. TYPE: Lecto-
type & with genitalia slide i456). Corozal (Canal Zone), 27 Oct 1920, no
collector (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 287). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae in treeholes, rockholes, coconut husks, artificial containers and occa-
sionally ground pools].
89. Haemagogus (H.) gladiator Dyar, 1921 [= argyromeris|. TYPE: Holo-
type & (39) with genitalia slide (1488), Corozal (Canal Zone), 30 Nov 1909, A.
H. Jennings (USNM, 24340). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treehole near Kraft's
house. Holotype bred from larva.
90. Haemagogus (H.) chalcospilans Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Holotype “ (247)
and genitalia slide (1481), Caldera Island, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 27 Mar
1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 24334). BIONOMICS: Larvae in salt pools in
rocks near the seacoast; [specially addicted to rot cavities in mangrove trees
(Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951: 119)|. Holotype bred, presumably
from larva. 3 |
91. Haemagogus (H.) lucifer (Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913). TYPE: Lecto-
type o (299) on slide 309, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 14 Apr 1909, A. H. Jen-
nings (USNM; selection of Dyar 1921: 107; see Stone and Knight 1955: 288).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
92. Culex (Lutzia) allostigma (Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1915). TYPE: Lec-
totype o (149. 8) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide (592),
Las Cascadas (Canal Zone), 16 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 14501;
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 51
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 42; lectotype does not bear type number).
BIONOMICS: Larvae from a rusty bucket near a house at Las Cascadas, with
no other mosquito larvae. present.
93. Culex (C.) chidesteri Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype o (1520) with gen-
italia slide, Colon (Colon), 24 June 1921, W. F. Chidester (USNM, 24716; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in open sunny
Swamps, in deeply shaded pools and in slow flowing streams with floating de-
bris (Arnett 1948: 179)|. Adults taken on hospital screens between 0700 and
0800 hrs.
94. Culex (C.) loquaculus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= corniger]. TYPE: Lecto-
type , Corozal (Canal Zone), date and collector not specified (USNM, 12050;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
rockholes, treeholes, ground pools or artificial containers].
95. Culex (C.) ousqua Dyar, 1918 [= coronator]. TYPE: Holotype o (181. 1),
Panama, date not specified, A. Busck (USNM, 21602). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in all types of permanent and semi-permanent ground waters].
96. Culex (C.) usquatissimus Dyar, 1922 [= coronator]. TYPE: Lectotype
co (1588) with genitalia slide, Toro Point (Canal Zone), 27 Oct 1921, J. B.
Shropshire (USNM, 25147; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 57). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae in all types of permanent and semi-permanent ground waters].
97. Culex (C.) jubilator Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= declarator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type & (3), Taboga Island (Panama), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM,
16916 (cited as 10916 in original description); selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae in old tubs in a pasture near the bathing
beach. Lectotype bred from larva.
98. Culex (C.) revelator Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= declarator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (25.2) with genitalia slide (341), Taboga Island (Canal Zone), date not
specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 10917; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a:
55). BIONOMICS: Larvae in boat containing water. Lectotype bred from larva.
99. Culex (C.) delys Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1915. TYPE: Holotype 2, as-
sociated larval skin not preserved, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 15 Dec 1908, A.
H. Jennings (USNM, 12706). BIONOMICS: Larva in swampy pond in bamboo
woods. ?
100. Culex (C.) reflector Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= interrogator]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o’, Ancon (Canal Zone), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12101;
selection of Stone and Knight-1957a: 55). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treehole. Lec-
totype bred from larva. :
101. Culex (C.) laticlasper Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype “
and dissected genitalia on same slide, Cerro Punta, Chiriqui Volcano region
(Chiriqui), elev. 6500 ft, 10 Dec 1952 (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in palm
spathes on forest floor [however, authors state that larva and pupa unknown].
Holotype taken at light. :
102. Culex (C.) equivocator Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= mollis]. TYPE: Lecto-
type & (49.10), Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 9 May-18 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10873; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo
joints. Lectotype bred from larva.
103. Culex (C.) elocutilis Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= mollis]. TYPE: Lectotype
o& (399) with genitalia slide (340), 2.5 miles from mouth of Cascajal River,
Portobelo Bay (Colon), 30 May 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12051; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a hole in the center of
a large ''cedar"’ stump, newly cut, the water foul and highly colored. Lecto-
type bred from larva. }
52 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
104. Culex (C.) lepostenis Dyar, 1923 [= mollis]. TYPE: Holotype 0, Cas-
cajal River, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 30 May 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in leaf-bases of epiphytic bromeliads.
105. Culex (C.) proximus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Lecto-
type & (5.10) with genitalia slide (397), Taboga Island (Panama), date not spe-
cified, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12208; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 55).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in a tub of water used for cattle.
- 106. Culex (Melanoconion) panocossa Dyar, 1923 [= aikenii]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o with genitalia slide (1809), Bas Obispo (Canal Zone, Feb 1923, J. B.
Shropshire (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 54). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae among roots of Pistia. Lectotype bred from larva.
107. Culex (Mel.) cuclyx Dyar & Shannon, 1924 [= bastagarius]. TYPE:
Holotype 0, Cardenas River, Fort Clayton (Canal Zone), Apr 1923, R. C.
Shannon (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae only in slow flowing streams with
vegetation, sunny; October (Arnett 1948: 185)]. ;
108. Culex (Mel.) caribeanus Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype
and dissected genitalia mounted upon same slide. Mojinga Swamp (Canal Zone),
6 July 1952 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ground waters]. Adults
"taken at light."
109. Culex (Mel. ) changuinolae Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype
o and dissected genitalia on same slide, vicinity of Almirante (Bocas del Toro),
1 May 1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: Adults taken in light trap.
110. Culex (Mel.) chrysonotum Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lectotype
(417) with genitalia slide (337), Ancdn (Canal Zone), 14 Aug 1908, A. H. Jen-
nings (USNM, 11966; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 88;see Stone and
Knight 1957a: 45-46). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a ditch, in a small patch of al-
gae beside railroad track, and in a swamp [pertains to 3 separate collections
of type series].
111. Culex (Mel.) dysmathes Dyar & Ludlow, 1921 [= conspirator]. TYPE:
Lectotype & (1346) with genitalia slide, Cativa (Colén), 19 Oct 1920, J. B.
Shropshire (USNM, 23943; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae in shady rockpools; rainy season (Arnett 1948: 186)].
112. Culex (Mel.) fatuator Dyar & Shannon, 1924 [= conspirator]. TYPE:
Holotype o, Cardenas River (Canal Zone), Apr 1923, R. C. Shannon (USNM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in ground pools of permanent nature (Dyar 1928: 306)].
113. Culex (Mel.) distinguendus Dyar, 1928. TYPE: Lectotype * with
genitalia slide (2327), Mojinga Swamp, Atlantic side (Canal Zone), 5 July 1927
D. P. Curry (USNM, 40777; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 89). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in small, densely shaded jungle pool (Foote 1954: 42)].
114. Culex (Mel.) dunni Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype o (C-39) and geni-
talia slide, Mandinga River (Canal Zone), date not specified, L. H. Dunn
(USNM, 21714; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae
associated with Pistia. Lectotype reared from larva. | )
115. Culex (Mel.) ruffinis Dyar & Shannon, 1924 [= dunni]. TYPE: Holo-
type *, Barro Colorado Island (Canal Zone), 9 July 1923, R. C. Shannon
See BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent ground waters, associated with
Pistia].
116. Culex (Mel.) apeteticus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913 [= educator].
TYPE: Lectotype & (522) with genitalia slide, Upper Pequeni River (Panama),
27 Mar 1909, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12707; selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 43). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a Swampy pond and in holes in rocks
[pertains to 2 separate collections]. :
9
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes D3
117. Culex (Mel.) aneles Dyar & Ludlow, 1922 [= educator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o’, Cardenas River (Canal Zone), 11 Feb 1921 (USNM, 25069; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957a: 43). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in grassy pools and streams
in the sun; July to October (Arnett 1948: 168)].
118. Culex (Mel.) egcymon Dyar, 1923. TYPE: Lectotype “, 3 legs dry
mounted and the rest on slide 1780, Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 2 May 1907, A.
Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in slowly running spring, full of leaves and small fish. Lectotype bred from
larva.
119. Culex (Mel.) elephas Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype & with genitalia
slide, Juan Diaz (Panama), 28 Jan 1936 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in permanent ground waters]. Holotype taken by sweeping.
120. Culex (Mel.) curryi Dyar, 1926 [= elevator]. TYPE: Lectotype o on
slide, Mojinga River Swamp, west of canal entrance, about 5 miles from
Cristobal (Canal Zone), 20 Apr 1926, D. P. Curry (USNM, 29375; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a rock pool in a trickling
stream in a dense jungle swamp. Lectotype bred from larva.
121. Culex (Mel.) dornarum Dyar & Shannon, 1924 [= elevator]. TYPE:
Holotype o", Sweet Water Reservoir, Fort Sherman (Canal Zone), 5 Sept 1923,
R. C. Shannon (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in rock pools, rockholes, jungle
streams, one record in fallen log, in the shade, usually in flowing water; com-
mon in rainy season (Arnett 1948: 189)].
122. Culex (Mel.) leprincei Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= erraticus|. TYPE: Lec-
totype o’, near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 26 Apr 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10869;
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae from a large
ill-smelling pool caused by dumping of dirt. Lectotype bred from larva.
- 123. Culex (Mel.) trachycampa Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= erraticus]. TYPE:
Lectotype & (54.1) with genitalia slide (401), Las Cascadas (Canal Zone), 13
May 1907, C. H. Bath (USNM, 12194; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 57).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in a ground pool.
124. Culex (Mel. ) fairchildi Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype &“
and dissected genitalia on same slide, Patifio Point (Darien), 17 July 1952
(USNM). BIONOMICS: Adults ''taken at light."
125. Culex (Mel. ) flabellifer Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype “ with genitalia
slide, Santa Rosa (Colon), June 1932 (USNM; only the genitalia slide remains,
see Stone and Knight 1957a: 58). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permarient
ground waters]. Holotype taken by sweeping.
126. Culex (Mel.) galindoi Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype
genitalia on slide, Quebrada Escondida, Rio Pequeni (Panama), 26 Mar 1949,
P. Galindo V. and H. Trapido (USNM, 59875). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in permanent ground waters]. Holotype taken in rock crevices along a stream.
127. Culex (Mel.) iolambdis Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype o, [no specific
locality in Panama, presumably in Canal Zone], date not specified, A. Busck
(USNM, 21603). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in rims of small ponds or from stand-
ing ey in the aerial roots of mangrove in Florida (Pratt and Seabrook
1952: 29).
128. Culex (Mel.) johnsoni Galindo & Mendez, 1961. TYPE: Holotype &
genitalia on slide, Pacora (Panama), Oct 1958 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters]. Holotype taken by sweeping.
129. Culex (Mel.) jubifer Komp & Brown, 1935. TYPE: Holotype “ with
genitalia slide, Mojinga Swamp (Canal Zone), Aug 1932, C. G. Brown (USNM;
only genitalia slide remaining, see Stone and Knight 1957a: 59). BIONOMICS:
_ [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
54 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
130. Culex (Mel.) keenani Galindo & Mendez, 1961. TYPE: Holotype &
with genitalia slide, Pacora (Panama), 27 May 1959 (USNM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent ground waters]. Adults collected at light ina
Shannon trap.
131. Culex (Mel.) kummi Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype & gen-
italia on slide, ‘Chino Swamp,'' Almirante (Bocas del Toro), 14 July 1934,
Ww. f W. Komp (USNM, 59874). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in swamps (Foote 1954:
64) |.
*132. Culex (Mel.) menytes Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype %, Trinidad River
(Canal Zone), 20 Mar 1912, A. Busck (USNM, 21716). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters]. |
*133. Culex (Mel.) haynei Komp & Curry, 1932 [= menytes]. TYPE: Holo-
type o with genitalia slide, Mojinga Swamp, lower Chagres River (Canal Zone),
date not specified, W. H. W. Komp and D. P. Curry (USNM; genitalia slide
only, see Stone and Knight 1957a: 59). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in per-
manent ground waters]. _ ? |
134. Culex (Mel.) mesodenticulatus Galindo & Mendez, 1961. TYPE: Holo-
type o& and dissected genitalia on same slide, vicinity of Almirante (Bocas del
Toro), 17 Apr 1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent
ground waters]. Holotype ''taken at light."
135. Culex (Mel.) mychonde Komp in Dyar 1928 [= opisthopus|]. TYPE:
Holotype o, Almirante Bac del Toro), 1 Feb 1928, W. H. W. Komp (USNM;
only the genitalia remain, Stone and Knight 1957a: 59). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in streams or swamps, possibly in crabholes].
136. Culex (Mel. ) paracrybda Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype “ with geni-
talia slide, Juan Diaz (Panama), 28 Jan 1936 (USNM). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters]. Holotype taken by sweeping.
137. Culex (Mel.) psatharus Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Lectotype & (1318) with
genitalia slide, Colon (Colon), 28 July 1920, W. S. Chidester (USNM; selec-
tion of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 95). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in brackish pools
in jungle (Dyar 1928: 296)]. Adults taken on screens of Colon hospital.
138. Culex (Mel. ) pseudotaeniopus Galindo and Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Hol-
otype o and dissected genitalia on same slide, Mojinga Swamp (Canal Zone),
17 June 1952 (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in shallow pools among rocks or
buttressed roots in slowly flowing, densely shaded, jungle streams. Holotype
taken at light. 2
139. Culex (Mel. ) quadrifoliatus Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype o with gen-
italia slide, Mojinga Swamp, lower Chagres River, Atlantic side (Canal Zone),
6 Dec 1933 (USNM; only the genitalia slide remains, see Stone and Knight 1957
a: 59). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
140. Culex (Mel. ) quasihibridus Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype
co and dissected genitalia on same slide, Puerto Pilon (Colon), 28 Aug 1952
(USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent ground waters].
141. Culex (Mel.) bilobatus Galindo & Blanton, 1954 [= sardinerae|]. TYPE:
Holotype & and dissected genitalia on same slide, Rio Banana, near Almirante
(Bocas del Toro), 20 Mar 1953 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in per-
manent ground waters]. Holotype collected in light trap.
142. Culex (Mel.) fur Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= spissipes]|. TYPE: Holotype @,
Col6n (Colon), date not specified, A. C. H. Russell (USNM, 10259). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters].
143. Culex (Mel.) epanastasis Dyar, 1922 [= taeniopus]. TYPE: Holotype
o&, Arenal River, Toro Point (Canal Zone), 19 July 1922, J. B. Shropshire
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes a})
(USNM, 25761). BIONOMICS: Larva in river. Holotype bred from larva.
144. Culex (Mel.) tecmarsis Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype “ with geni-
talia slide (925), Trinidad River (Canal Zone), 9 June 1912, A. Busck
(USNM, 21715; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 97). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in permanent ground waters]. Adults taken at light.
145. Culex (Mel.) vomerifer Komp, 1932. TYPE: Holotype “ and genitalia
slide, Almirante (Bocas del Toro), date not specified, W. H. W. Komp (USNM,
only the genitalia slide remains, see Stone and Knight 1957a: 59). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters].
146. Culex (Mel.) zeteki Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype o, Gatun (Canal
Zone), 16 Jan 1913, J. Zetek (USNM, 21778). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in grassy,
more or less permanent pools in Surinam (Bonne and Bonne-Wepster 1925: 274)].
147. Culex (Mochlostyrax) arboricolus Galindo & Mendez, 1961. TYPE: Hol-
otype o (01306) with genitalia slide, Cerro La Victoria (Panama), 4 Jan 1950
(USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
148. Culex (Mochl.) lacertosus Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype
o genitalia slide, Almirante (Bocas del Toro), 19 July 1934, W. H. W. Komp
(USNM, 59870). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-perma-
nent ground waters].
149. Culex (Mochl.) hesitator Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= pilosus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o, near Las Cascadas (Canal Zone), 18 May 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10872; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 50). BIONOMICS: Pupae in a small
swampy stream. Lectotype bred from pupa.
150. Culex (Mochl.) rooti Rozeboom, 1935. TYPE: Lectotype “ genitalia, a
few miles east of Panama City (Panama), 24 Nov 1934 (USNM, . 50942; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 55). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ground pools.
151. Culex (Mochl.) vexillifer Komp, 1936. TYPE: Lectotype “ with geni-
talia slide, Barro Colorado Island (Canal Zone), 15 Jan 1935, W. H. W. Komp
(USNM; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 97; only the genitalia slide re-
mains, see Stone and Knight 1957a: 58). BIONOMICS: Larvae in water held
between the buttressed roots of a tree overhanging a stream;|larvae normally
in treeholes (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido 1951: 127)].
152. Culex (Microculex) daumastocampa Dyar & Knab, 1908. TYPE: Lec-
totype o (135.4) with fragments of associated larval skin and genitalia slide
(402), Fort San Felipe, Portobelo Bay (Colon), 21 Jan 1908, A. H. Jennings
(USNM, 11967; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS: Larvae
between leaves of a bromeliad.
153. Culex (Micr.) erethyzonfer Galindo & Blanton, 1954. TYPE: Holotype
o with genitalia slide, Palo Santo, Chiriqui Volcano region (Chiriqui), elev.
4500 ft, 18 Oct 1950 (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads
[not from type locality but in Chiriqui Volcano region]. Holotype taken sweep-
ing in dense forest.
154. Culex (Micr.) gaudeator Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype ,
near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 10 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10871; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliad
Tillandsia. Lectotype bred from larva.
155. Culex (Micr.) jenningsi Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype ¢,
native village near Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 10 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM,
10867; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 52). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epi-
phytic bromeliad Tillandsia. Lectotype bred from larva.
156. Culex (Aedinus) browni Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype & with genitalia
slide, near the "Army boundary ditch" near Gatun (Canal Zone), 29 Nov 1933,
00 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
C. G. Brown (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bromeli-
ads|. Holotype taken by sweeping. |
157. Culex (A.) bifoliata Dyar, 1922 [= conservator]. TYPE: Lectotype ¢
(1644) with genitalia slide, Miraflores (Canal Zone), 15 Dec 1921, J. B.
Shropshire (USNM, 25254; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 44). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in treehole. Lectotype bred from larva.
158. Culex (A.) corrigani Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype ?, near
Tabernilla (Canal Zone), 18 July 1907, A. Busck (USNM, 10870). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in bamboo joints. Holotype bred from larva. |
159. Culex (A.) chalcocorystes Martini, 1914 [= corrigani]. TYPE: and
?, Portobelo (Colon), Nov 1913, E. Martini (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in treeholes]. Adults in an old cistern.
160. Culex (Carrollia) secundus Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: ¢,
?, larva, Canal Zone (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bamboo traps, treeholes
and on the ground in palm spathes and artificial containers (Galindo, Carpen-
ter and Trapido 1951: 126)]. |
161. Deinocerites dyari Belkin & Hogue, 1959. TYPE: Holotype o& (1183),
Corozal (Canal Zone), 20 Apr 1919, J. Zetek (USNM, 64262). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in crabholes].
162. Deinocerites melanophyllum Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Lectotype &
(213), back of the wireless telegraph station at Coldn (Colén), 20 July 1907,
A. Busck (USNM, 10876; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae and adults in crabholes, adults swarming above hole at dusk,
not biting man. Lectotype bred from larva.
163. Deinocerites monospathus Dyar, 1925 [= melanophyllum]. TYPE:
Holotype 2, Fort Sherman (Canal Zone), 24 Apr 1925, D. Baker (USNM, 28309).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in crabholes].
164. Deinocerites pseudes Dyar & Knab, 1909. TYPE: Lectotype ¢ (378),
Ancon (Canal Zone), 13 July or 24 Nov 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12053; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crabholes.
*165. Deinocerites spanius (Dyar & Knab, 1909). TYPE: Lectotype ? (69),
Corozal (Canal Zone), 11 Dec 1907, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 12052; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crabholes. Lectotype
bred from larva.
166. Corethrella ananacola Dyar, 1926. TYPE: Larva, pupa and adult, near
Gatun (Canal Zone) (cited as Ft. Randolph, C. Z., Lane 1953: 85), date not
specified, C. H. Bath (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliad Ananas
magdalenae. Adult(s) bred. : |
167. Corethrella blanda Dyar, 1928. TYPE: Holotype % on slide, Las Sa-
banas (Canal Zone), 28 May 1928, D. P. Curry (USNM, 40517). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in shaded grassy pool, cannibalistic when first placed together in "tube."
Holotype bred from larva.
- 168. Corethrella dyari Lane, 1942. TYPE: Holotype 2, Darién (Canal Zone),
"XI. 1923," H. G. Dyar and R. C. Shannon (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters or treeholes].
169. Corethrella jenningsi Lane, 1942. TYPE: Holotype 2, Canal Zone,
date not specified (1938-9), A. H. Jennings (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in permanent ground waters or treeholes]. :
170. Corethrella stonei Lane, 1942. TYPE: Holotype o, Caldera Island,
Portobelo Bay (Colon), date not specified, A. H. Jennings (USNM). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in crabholes]. Adults presumably in crabholes.
171. Lutzomiops pallida (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype 0, Portobelo (Colén),
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes o7
date and collector not specified (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliad
Tillandsia.
172. Sayomyia festivus (Dyar & Shannon, 1924) [= brasiliensis]. TYPE: ¢,
@, Matachin (Canal Zone), 2 June 1908, A. H. Jennings (USNM, 27458). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in stagnant permanent ground waters].
173. Dixella atra (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype 2, Cafio Saddle, Gatun
Lake (Canal Zone), 13 May 1923, R. C. Shannon (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in vegetation in streams, ponds or other ground waters].
*174. Dixella lirio (Dyar & Shannon, 1924). TYPE: Holotype &, Monte Li-
rio (Canal Zone), Sept 1923, H. G. Dyar and R. C. Shannon (USNM, 27455).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in vegetation in streams, ponds or other
ground waters].
List of Localities
BOCAS DEL TORO
Almirante and vicinity: 2. Anopheles (S.) kompi; 9. Anopheles (A. ) anoma-
lophyllus (Wenham's farm); 78. Uranotaenia-paludosa; 109. Culex (Mel.) chan-
guinolae; 131. Culex (Mel.) kummi (Chino swamp); 134. Culex (Mel.) mesoden-
ticulatus; 135. Culex (Mel.) mychonde; 141. Culex (Mel.) bilobatus (Banana
River); 145. Culex (Mel.) vomerifer; 148. Culex (Mochl.) lacertosus.
Locality not specified: 72. Sabethes (S.) tarsopus; 74. Mansonia (R.) coti-
cula.
CANAL ZONE
Agua Clara Reservoir, near Gatun [Atlantic]: 26. Wyeomyia (W.) charmion.
Ancon [Pacific]: 100. Culex (C.) reflector; 110. Culex (Mel.) chrysonotum;
164. Deinocerites pseudes.
Barro Colorado Island [Atlantic]: 115. Culex (Mel.) ruffinis; 151. Culex
(Mochl. ) vexillifer.
Bas Obispo [Atlantic]: 61. Wyeomyia (D.) fauna; 106. Culex (Mel.) pan-
ocossa.
Camacho [Atlantic]: 3. Anopheles (A.) niveopalpis (Camacho Reservoir);
51. Wyeomyia (D.) intonca (Empire, Camacho River); 70. Wyeomyia (D.) ypsi-
pola; 86. Aedes (F.) leucotaeniatus.
Camp Gaillard (? Ancon) [Pacific]: 19. Trichoprosopon (I.) shropshirei.
Cafio Saddle, Gatin Lake, 14 m southwest of Gatun [Atlantic]: 173. Dixella
atra. |
Cardenas (Rio) [Pacific]: 112. Culex (Mel.) fatuator; 117. Culex (Mel. )
aneles.
Corozal [Pacific]: 18. Trichoprosopon (I.) espini (also Culebra and Mira-
flores Lake); 60. Wyeomyia (D.) pandora; 88. Haemagogus (H.) argyromeris;
89. Haemagogus (H.) gladiator; 94. Culex (C.) loquaculus; 161. Deinocerites
dyari; 165. Deinocerites spanius.
Culebra [Atlantic]: 18. Trichoprosopon (I.) espini (also Corozal and Mira-
flores Lake); 33. Wyeomyia (W.) culebrae; 57. Wyeomyia (D.) prolepidis.
Darien [Atlantic]: 168. Corethrella dyari.
Empire [Atlantic]: See Camacho.
Fort Clayton [Pacific]: 28. Wyeomyia (W.) florestan; 107. Culex (Mel.) cu-
clyx:
Fort Sherman [Atlantic]: 121. Culex (Mel.) dornarum (Sweet Water Reser-
voir); 163. Deinocerites monospathus.
58 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
France Field [Atlantic]: 63. Wyeomyia (D.) hemisiris.
Gatun [Atlantic]: 1. Chagasia bathana; 4. Anopheles (A.) neomaculipalpis
(also Panama City); 14. Anopheles (K.) hylephilus; 62. Wyeomyia (D.) modal-
ma; 64. Wyeomyia (D.) phroso; 146. Culex (Mel.) zeteki; 156. Culex (A.)
browni; 166. Corethrella ananacola.
Gorgona [Atlantic]: 69. Wyeomyia (D.) cacodela.
La Boca (Balboa) [Pacific]: 8. Anopheles (N.) gorgasi.
Las Cascadas [Atlantic]: 17. Trichoprosopon (T.) wilsoni (Chagres Camp);
92. Culex (L.) allostigma; 123. Culex (Mel.) trachycampa; 149. Culex
(Mochl. ) hesitator.
Las Sabanas, near Ancon [Pacific]: 167. Corethrella blanda.
Lion Hill [Atlantic]: 58. Wyeomyia (D.) canfieldi.
Locality not specified: 10. Anopheles (N.) aquasalis; 12. Anopheles (N.)
aquacaelestis (Atlantic side); 127. Culex (Mel.) iolambdis; 160. Culex (Carrol.)
secundus; 169. Corethrella jenningsi.
Mandinga River [Atlantic]: 114. Culex (Mel. ) dunni.
Margarita [Atlantic]: 43. Wyeomyia (W.) incana.
Matachin [Atlantic]: 172. Sayomyia festivus.
Miraflores [Pacific]: 18. Trichoprosopon (I.) espini (also Corozal and Cu-
lebra); 20. Trichoprosopon (C.) dicellaphora; 66. Wyeomyia (D.) eloisa; 157.
Culex (A. ) bifoliata. |
Mojinga Swamp [Atlantic]: 108. Culex (Mel.) caribeanus; 113. Culex (Mel.)
distinguendus; 120. Culex (Mel.) curryi; 129. Culex (Mel.) jubifer; 133. Culex
(Mel. ) haynei; 138. Culex (Mel.) pseudotaeniopus; 139. Culex (Mel.) quadri-
foliatus.
Monte Lirio [Atlantic|: 174. Dixella lirio.
Tabernilla [Atlantic]: 15. Trichoprosopon (T.) trichorryes; 16. Trichopro-
sopon (T.) mogilasium; 22. Trichoprosopon (C.) culicivora; 23. Wyeomyia
(W.) panamena; 24. Wyeomyia (W.) chrysomus; 25. Wyeomyia (W.) philophone;
27. Wyeomyia (W.) codiocampa; 29. Wyeomyia (W.) hosautos; 30. Wyeomyia
(W.) symmachus; 31. Wyeomyia (W.) euethes; 35. Wyeomyia (W.) labesba;
38. Wyeomyia (W.) homothe; 39. Wyeomyia (W.) leucopisthepus; 41. Wyeo-
myia (W.) chresta; 48. Wyeomyia (D.) circumcincta; 53. Wyeomyia (D.) agyr-
tes; 54. Wyeomyia (D.) coenonus; 59. Wyeomyia (D.) agnostips; 67. Wyeomyia
(D.) onidus; 68. Wyeomyia (D.) pantoia; 71. Limatus cacophrades; 73. Sabe-
thes (Sabethinus) identicus; 76. Uranotaenia calosomata; 82. Orthopodomyia
phyllozoa; 91. Haemagogus (H.) lucifer; 99. Culex (C.) delys; 102. Culex
(C.) equivocator; 118. Culex (Mel.) egcymon; 122. Culex (Mel.) leprincei;
154. Culex (Micr.) gaudeator; 155. Culex (Micr.) jenningsi; 158. Culex (A.)
corrigani.
Toro Point [Atlantic]: 96. Culex (C.) usquatissimus; 143. Culex (Mel.) epa-
nastasis (Arenal River).
Trinidad River [Atlantic]: 132. Culex (Mel.) menytes; 144. Culex (Mel.)
tecmarsis. 8
CHIRIQUI 3
Chiriqui Volcano region: 5. Anopheles (A.) chiriquiensis (elev. 6500 ft);
47. Wyeomyia (Davis.) arborea (Bijao, elev. 3000 ft); 80. Uranotaenia trapi-
doi (El Hato, elev. 4500 ft); 101. Culex (C.) laticlasper (Cerro Punta, elev.
6500 ft); 153. Culex (Micr.) erethyzonfer (Palo Santo, elev. 4500 ft).
David: 77. Uranotaenia incognita.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes a9
COCLE
Tucue: 85. Aedes (F.) clarki.
COLON
Caldera Island, Portobelo Bay: 40. Wyeomyia (W.) abrachys; 42. Wyeo-
myia (W.) hapla; 52. Wyeomyia (D.) clasoleuca; 56. Wyeomyia (D. ) jocosa;
90. Haemagogus (H.) chalcospilans; 170. Corethrella stonei.
Cascajal (Rio): 104. Culex (C. y lepostenis.
Cativa: 111. Culex (Mel.) dysmathes.
Colon: 6. Anopheles Snow OR Tat punctimacula; 93. Culex (C.) chidesteri; 137. Cu-
lex (Mel.) psatharus; 142. Culex (Mel.) fur; 162. Deinocerites melanophylum.
Fort San Felipe, Portobelo Bay: 13. Anopheles (K.) neivai; 44. Wyeomyia
(W.) simmsi; 45. Wyeomyia (W.) dymodora; 46. Wyeomyia (W.) roloncetta;
50. Wyeomyia (D.) andropus; 152. Culex (Micr.) daumastocampa.
Portobelo: 32. Wyeomyia (W.) ee 65. Wyeomyia (D.) proviolans;
103. Culex (C.) elocutilis (Portobelo Bay, 2.5 mi from mouth of Cascajal
River); 159. Culex (A.) chalcocorystes; 171. Lutzomiops pallida.
Piet Pilon: 140. Culex (Mel. ) quasihibridus.
Santa Rosa: 125. Culex (Mel. ) flabellifer.
DARIEN
Patino Point: 124. Culex (Mel. ) fairchildi.
PANAMA, PROVINCE
Boqueron (Rio): 37. Wyeomyia (W.) scotinomus; 49. Wyeomyia (D.) macro-
tus.
ene
Cerro La Victoria: 147. Culex (Mochl.) arboricolus.
Chagres (Rio): 7. Anopheles (A.) malefactor ) malefactor (upper part); 87. Aedes (F.)
lithoecetor (between Alhajuela and San Juan). _
Escondida (Quebrada), Pequeni River: 126. Culex (Mel.) galindoi.
Juan Diaz: 119. Culex (Mel.) elephas; 136. Culex Culex (Mel. ) paracrybda aracrybda.
La Victoria, Cerro Azul, 2100 ft: 36. Wyeomyia Sea os i as ra ) nigritubus.
Pacora: 128. Culex (Mel. ) johnsoni; 130. Culex (Mel. ) keenani.
Paitilla: 83. Aedes (O.) hastatus.
Panama City: 4. Anopheles (A.) neomaculipalpus (east of; also Gatun, CZ);
150. Culex (Mochl.) rooti (a few miles east).
Pequeni (Upper Rio): 21. Trichoprosopon (C.) lampropos; 34. Wyeomyia
(W.) rolonca (Juanita (Rio), 2 miles up); 116. Culex (Mel. ) apeteticus.
San Juan de Pequeni: 55. Wyeomyia (D.) complosa.
Taboga Island: 81. Uranotaenia typhlosomata; 84. Aedes (O.) polyagrus;
97. Culex (C.) jubilator; 98. Culex (C.) revelator; 105. Culex (C.) proximus.
Tocumen: 79. Uranotaenia telmatophila.
PANAMA, REPUBLIC
Locality not specified: 11. Anopheles (N.) lloydi; 75. Mansonia (R.) nigri-
cans; 95. Culex (C.) ousqua.
PUERTO RICO
List of Species
1. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) portoricensis (Roeder, 1885). TYPE: ¢,
"Insula Portorico,'' no other data (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
60 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
2. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) portoricensis (Ludlow, 1905) [= taeniorhynchus].
TYPE: Lectotype o, San Juan, 15 Aug 1905, L. G. de Queveda (USNM, 10007;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 224). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
brackish or freshwater pools near the sea]. !
3. Culex (C.) toweri Dyar & Knab, 1907 [= secutor]. TYPE: Holotype &,
Mayaguez, Sept, W. V. Tower (USNM, 10222; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 57).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in artificial containers [and probably also ground pools or
treeholes].
4. Culex (Melanoconion) borinqueni Root, 1922 [= erraticus]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o, Rio Piedras, 7 July 1921, F. M. Root (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 44). BIONOMICS: Larvae in all sorts of ditches, slow streams,
pools and marshy places.
5, Culex (Mel.) sardinerae Fox, 1953. TYPE: Holotype 2 with associated
pupal skin and genitalia mount, Finca Sardinera, Dorado, 9 Apr 1952, I. Fox
(STMPR). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ground waters].
6. Corethrella tripunctata Lane, 1942. TYPE: Holotype &, Carolina,
elev. 100 ft, Sept, C. Ludlow (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crabholes un-
der rocks.
7. Dixella hoffmani (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype 2, Pueblo Viejo, 2 Nov
1935, W. A. Hoffman (USNM). BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in vegetation in
stream margins, lakes, ponds or swamps].
List of Localities
Carolina: 6. Corethrella tripunctata.
Dorado, Finca Sardinera: 5. Culex (Mel. ) aiaeiac.
Mayaguez: 3. Culex (C.) toweri.
Pueblo Viejo: 7. Dixella hoffmani.
Puerto Rico, no locality specified: 1. Toxorhynchites (L.) portoricensis.
Rio Piedras: 4. Culex (Mel.) borinqueni.
San Juan: 2. Aedes (O.) portoricensis.
ST, LUCIA
List of Species
*1. Wyeomyia (W.) grayii Theobald, 1901 [= pertinans]. TYPE: ¢, Castries,
Flore Farm, Piton [Trois Pitons ?], elev. 1000 ft, 25 Dec 1899, St. George
Gray; also from Grenada (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
Some of the adults of the type series were taken at 1400 hrs at above men-
tioned farm.
2. Uranotaenia lowii Theobald, 1901. TYPE: 2°, cemetery at St. Lucia
(Castries ?), Feb, G. C. Low (BM). BIONOMICS: Larvae taken in a pool at
the cemetery.
3. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) terminalis (Coquillett, 1906) [= ferox].
TYPE: Adults, St. Lucia (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary
rainpools in wooded areas].
4. Aedes (Stegomyia) luciensis (Theobald, 1901) [= aegypti]. TYPE: <, 9,
St. Lucia, no other data; also from British Guiana (BM). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
in artificial containers].
5. Culex (C.) scholasticus Theobald, 1901 [= inflictus]. TYPE:<c, @, St.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes , 61
Lucia, 21 Dec 1899, Otho Galgey; also from Grenada and St. Vincent (BM). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae possibly in crabholes].
6. Culex (C.) nigripalpus Theobald, 1901. TYPE: Holotype o, St. Lucia,
date not specified, G. C. Low (NE ?). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in per-
manent or semi-permanent ground waters].
*7. Deinocerites magnus (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: Holotype o, St. Lucia,
date not specified, G. C. Low (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in crabholes].
List of Localities
No specific localities are given for any species described from St. Lucia
except for 1. Wyeomyia (W.) grayii; presumably all species were collected at
or near Castries.
ST. VINCENT
List of Species
*1. Trichoprosopon (Isostomyia) perturbans (Williston, 1896). TYPE: 8 o
and 2, St. Vincent, H. H. Smith (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bromeliads,
Aechmaea, Guzmania]. |
2. Wyeomyia (W.) pertinans (Williston, 1896). TYPE: 6 o and , St. Vin-
cent, sea level and 1000 ft, H. H. Smith (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bro-
meliads]. : |
*3. Haemagogus (H.) splendens Williston, 1896. TYPE: 10, 79, St. Vin-
cent, 1000 ft, H. H. Smith (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
4. Culex (C.) scholasticus Theobald, 1901 [= inflictus]. TYPE: o, 9,
Cumberland Bay and Richmond Estate Works (111), 10 June 1899, H. Powell;
also from Grenada and St. Lucia (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae possibly in
crabholes].
: 5. Culex (C.) palus Theobald, 1903 [= nigripalpus]|. TYPE: @, marsh be-
hind Kingstown, G. C. Low; also o from Barbados (BM). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in a marsh.
6. Dixella clavulus (Williston, 1896). TYPE: 40, St. Vincent, H. H.
Smith (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably on edges of very small streams,
possibly in vegetation on edges of larger streams and ground pools].
List of Localities
The species described from St. Vincent Island are all from unspecified lo-
calities except for 4. Culex (C.) scholasticus and 5. Culex (C.) palus (see).
SURINAM
List of Species
1. Chagasia bonneae Root, 1927. TYPE: Holotype & (626) with associated
larval and pupal skins, Dam (Suriname), date not specified, BBW (USNM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably along margins of flowing streams].
2. Anopheles (A.) bonnei Fonseca & Ramos, 1939. TYPE: This nominal
62 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
species was proposed for mediopunctatus of Bonne and Bonne-Wepster (1925)
from Surinam, no specimens were seen; a lectotype (or neotype ?) should be
designated; the species occurs in Surinam along the coast and in the interior.
BIONOMICS: Larvae in small pools in woods.
8. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) aldrichanus (Bonne-Wepster and Bonne, 1920)
[= bambusicolus]. TYPE: 2°, Dam (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in terrestrial bromeliads. :
4. Toxorhynchites (L.) guianensis (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920) [= gua-
deloupensis]|. TYPE: Holotype 2, Kwakoegron (Saramacca), date not specified,
BBW (TH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
5. Toxorhynchites (L.) moengoensis (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1923) [= theo-
baldi]. TYPE: o, ?, Moengo (Marowijne), date not specified, BBW (ITH). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in leaf axils of Heliconia and Phenakospermum.
*§. Wyeomyia (W.) aphobema Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype “, Lawa River
(Marowijne), Mar 1917, BBW (USNM, 21915). BIONOMICS: Larvae in brome-
liads. |
7. Wyeomyia (W.) fallax Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1919 [= oblita]. TYPE:
°, Paramaribo (Suriname), Dec 1916, BBW (LU). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
bromeliads.
*8. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) albosquamata Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1919.
TYPE: Holotype & (3550), Lawa River (Marowijne), Mar 1917, BBW (ITH).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
9. Wyeomyia (D.) argenteorostris (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1919). TYPE:
Holotype “, Lawa River (Marowijne), Mar 1917, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in bromeliads.
10. Wyeomyia (D.) flui (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920) [= confusa]. TYPE:
?, Albina (Marowijne), Apr 1917, Dam (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in leaf axils of Musaceae or Araceae]. Adults
captured landing in the woods.
11. Wyeomyia (D.) lamellata (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920). TYPE: Hol-
otype o, placer of Cie des Mines d'Or, Lawa River (Marowijne), date not spe-
cified, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
*12. Wyeomyia (D.) occulta Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1919. TYPE: Holo-
type o, sandy district (Suriname), Mar 1918, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in leaf axils of Heliconia.
13. Wyeomyia (D.) roucouyana (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920). TYPE:
Holotype 2, Lawa River (Marowijne), Mar 1917, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads].
14. Wyeomyia (D.) surinamensis Bruijning, 1959. TYPE: Holotype <, Or-
namibo (Suriname), 11 Aug 1954, C. F. A. Bruijning (LM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in bromeliads].
i 15. Phoniomyia splendida (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1919). TYPE: ¢, &,
larva, pupa; sandy district (Suriname), Mar 1918; Lawa River (Marowijne),
Mar 1917; Sarah [Sara] Creek (Marowijne), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
16. Limatus pseudomethysticus (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920). TYPE:
2, locality and other data not specified, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
fallen palm leaves and in treeholes.
17. Sabethes (S.) kappleri Bonne, 1923 [= amazonicus]. TYPE: Holotype
2, Moengo (Marowijne), Feb 1923, C. Bonne (NE, destroyed by molds). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo]. Holotype captured in
the woods in the daytime.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes | 63
18. Sabethes (Sabethoides) imperfectus (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920)
[= chloropterus]. TYPE: Holotype ?, Dam (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes and bamboo internodes ‘with small
lateral opening; bamboo traps with small lateral holes should be used. Fe-
males captured biting in woods].
19. Psorophora (J anthinosoma) vanhalli (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= ferox].
TYPE: Holotype &, Paramaribo (Suriname), date not specified, Van Hall (USNM,
9967; see Stone and Knight 1955: 286-287). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
temporary ground pools in wooded areas].
20. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) eucephalaeus Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype & (D)
with associated larval and pupal skins (B) and genitalia slide (971), Zanderij I
(Suriname), 12-20 Mar 1918, BBW (USNM, 21911; selection of Stone and Knight
1956a: 217). BIONOMICS: Larvae in temporary rainpools in the woods in sandy
land; lie on backs on bottom of pools.
21. Aedes (Finlaya) argyrothorax Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE:
Holotype o, Geiersvlijt, an estate near Paramaribo (Suriname), date not spe-
cified, BBW (ITH; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 214). BIONOMICS: Larvae
probably in treeholes]. Holotype captured near a treehole.
22. Aedes (Howardina) arborealis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE:
3, 9, larva Dam (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH; not in USNM as stated in
Stone Knight and Starcke 1959: 173). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a treehole ina
Small tree fallen over a small creek.
23. Culex (C.) bonneae Dyar & Knab, 1919. TYPE: Lectotype “ with geni-
talia slide (822), Cie des Mines d'Or, Lawa River (Marowijne), Mar 1917,
BBW (USNM, 21646; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 44). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a water barrel, a very dirty puddle and a treehole.
24. Culex (C.) brevispinosus Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: &, 9,
larva; Kabelstation (Suriname), Dec 1918; Kwakoegron (Saramacca), Mar 1919;
BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in an old boat on the bank of the Suriname
River and in a small ground pool.
25. Culex (C.) usquatus Dyar, 1918 [= coronator]. TYPE: Lectotype
with genitalia slide (967); Marowijne and Lawa rivers (Marowijne), Feb 1917;
Suriname River Serine), Feb 1918; BBW (USNM; selection of Stone dod
Knight 1957a: 57). BIONOMICS: Larvde in old boats, very dirty puddles,
water barrels, and ina fallen, nearly burned tree.
26. Culex (C.) aikenii Dyar & Knab, 1908; lachrimans Dyar & Knab, 1909,
new name e pipiens quinquefasciatus]. TYPE: Lectotype & (F6) with genita-
lia slide, Nieuw Amsterdam (Commewijne), 17 Feb 1908, J. Aiken (USNM,
11977; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 42). BIONOMICS: Larvae prob-
ably in ground pools contaminated with domestic wastes or in artificial con-
tainers].
27. Culex (C.) surinamensis Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype & (21) with as-
sociated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide (975), Lawa River (Maro-
wijne), Mar 1917, BBW (USNM, 21912; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a:
56). BIONOMICS: ‘Larvae in rockpools in Lawa River and in a water barrel.
28. Culex (Melanoconion) albinensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE:
o, 9, larvae, near Paramaribo (Suriname), 1919, BBW (LU). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in ground pools.
29. Culex (Mel.) maroniensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920 [= albinen-
sis]. TYPE: Holotype 0, specific locality unknown, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in eround pools].
30. Culex (Mel.) alcocci Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: o, §,
64 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
larva, Zanderij I (Suriname), 1 Mar 1918, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
temporary pools in the woods. |
31. Culex (Mel.) vapulans Dyar, 1920 [= bastagarius]. TYPE: Lectotype “
(BB 30) with genitalia slide, near Paramaribo (Suriname), date not specified,
BBW (USNM, 22738; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 88). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a ground pool.
32. Culex (Mel.) xivylis Dyar, 1920 [= bastagarius]. TYPE: Holotype ¢
(BB714c) with genitalia slide, interior of colony (Suriname), 24 Jan 1919, BBW
(USNM, 22747; see Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 92 and Stone and Knight 1957a:
58). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ground pool.
33. Culex (Mel.) commevynensis Bonne-Wepster~& Bonne, 1920. TYPE:
Holotype &, Alkamaar (Commewijne), Mar 1919, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a ditch. ; |
34. Culex (Mel.) comminutor Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype “ with genitalia
slide, interior of colony (Suriname), May 1919, BBW (USNM, 22739). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in ground pool.
35. Culex (Mel.) confundior Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype
genitalia slide (M94 P2), near Paramaribo (Suriname), probably 1918, BBW
(USNM, 59876). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a ground pool.
36. Culex (Mel.) coppenamensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE:
Holotype o, Kabelstation (Suriname), May 1919, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in ground pool.
37. Culex (Mel.) corentynensis Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Lectotype o with geni-
talia slide (BB 643), probably Corantijn River (Nickerie), 12 Jan 1919, BBW
(USNM, 22737; selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 89). BIONOMICS: Pu-
pae in ground pools. |
38. Culex (Mel.) eastor Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype o, coastal region
(Suriname), Feb 1917, BBW (USNM, 22740). BIONOMICS: Pupa in swamp.
39. Culex (Mel.) vaxus Dyar, 1920 [= educator]. TYPE: Holotype * (BB II
671) with genitalia slide, interior of colony (Suriname), 18 Jan 1919, BBW
(USNM, 22743; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 58; in our opinion Dyar designated
a holotype). BIONOMICS: Larva in a ditch. |
40. Culex (Mel.) bibulus Dyar, 1920 [= educator]. TYPE: Holotype ¢, in-
terior of colony (Suriname), 24 Jan 1919, BBW (USNM, 22744). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in ground pool.
41. Culex (Mel.) idottus Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype 0, interior of colony
(Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (USNM, 22745). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a ditch.
42. Culex (Mel.) maxinocca Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Lectotype (BB 971) with
genitalia slide, interior of colony (Suriname), May 1919, BBW (USNM, 22741;
selection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 92). BIONOMICS: Larvae in ground
pool.
43. Culex (Mel.) tosimus Dyar, 1920 [= maxinocca|]. TYPE: Holotype <,
interior of colony (Suriname), 18 Dec 1918, BBW (USNM, 22742). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in a pool in the woods. ,
44. Culex (Mel.) nicceriensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: &, ?,
larvae, Kabelstation (Suriname), Dec 1918 and May 1919, BBW (ITH). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in ground pools.
45. Culex (Mel.) phlabistus Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype o, interior of
colony (Suriname), May 1919, BBW (USNM, 22736). BIONOMICS: Pupa in
ground pool. : :
| 46. Culex (Mel.) phlogistus Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype <, interior of col-
ony (Suriname), May 1919, BBW (USNM, 22735). BIONOMICS: Larvae in pools
in woods.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 65
47. Culex (Mel.) saramaccensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: ¢&,
?, larva, Suriname River, Kabelstation (Suriname), Dec 1918, BBW (ITH). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in rockpools. 7
48. Culex (Mel.) terebor Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype “ genitalia (BB 232),
locality not specified, 20 July 1917, BBW (USNM, 22733). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in pool in stream bed.
49. Culex (Mel.) wepsterae Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype
genitalia (BB 366), near Paramaribo (Suriname), 5 Dec 1918, BBW (USNM,
59872). BIONOMICS: Pupa in pool with Pistia and other vegetation.
50. Culex (Mel.) ybarmis Dyar, 1920. TYPE: Holotype “ with associated
larval skin, near Paramaribo (Suriname), date not specified, BBW (USNM,
22734). BIONOMICS: Larva in ground pool.
51. Culex (Mel.) jonistes Dyar, 1920 [= ybarmis|. TYPE: Holotype o, in-
terior of colony (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (USNM, 22745). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in ditch.
52. Culex (Mel.) ensiformis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920 [= zeteki].
TYPE: 0, 9, larva; Kabelstation (Suriname), Dec 1918; Dam (Suriname), Jan
1919; BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in grassy, more or less permanent
pools.
53. Culex (Mochlostyrax) alogistus Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Lectotype &* (972
F) with genitalia slide, associated larval skin apparently lost, ? Zanderij I
(Suriname), Mar 1918, BBW (USNM, 21914; selection of Rozeboom and Komp
1950: 87; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 42). BIONOMICS: Larvae lying on backs
in bottom of temporary pools in woods.
54. Culex (Mochl.) multispinosus Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920[= caudellil.
TYPE: Holotype o with genitalia slide (Gf 41/22), Kabelstation (Suriname), May
1919, BBW (ITH; see Komp and Rozeboom 1951: 122). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
permanent ground pools.
55. Culex (Mochl.) foliafer Komp & Rozeboom, 1951. TYPE: Holotype o
genitalia (H) with associated larval and pupal skins, locality and date not spe-
cified, BBW (USNM, 59869). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ground pools].
56. Culex (Mochl.) curopinensis Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920 [= pilosus].
TYPE: Holotype 0, locality and date not specified, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae common throughout the year in more or less permanent ground pools].
57. Culex (Microculex) chryselatus Dyar & Knab, 1919. TYPE: Lectotype
o’ (23) with genitalia slide (885) and nonassociated larval and pupal skins, Cie
des Mines d'Or, Lawa River (Marowijne), Mar 1917, BBW (USNM, 21647).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
*58. Culex (Eubonnea) tapena Dyar, 1919 [= amazonensis]. TYPE: Holotype
o, Paramaribo (Suriname), 5 Jan 1919, BBW (USNM, 22623). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in permanent pool with much vegetation.
59. Culex (Carrollia) bonnei Dyar, 1921. TYPE: Lectotype “, ? Gansee
(Suriname), date not specified, BBW (USNM, 24882; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 44). BIONOMICS: Larvae in an old kerosene tin in village.
60. Culex (Carrol.) infoliatus Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920. TYPE: Hol-
otype %, Dam (Suriname), Jan 1919, BBW (ITH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a
hole in a green and still living tree fallen across a small creek.
List of Localities
COMMEWIJNE
Alkmaar: 33. Culex (Mel. ) commevynensis.
66 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
Nieuw Amsterdam: 26. Culex (C.) aikenii.
MAROWIJNE
Albina: 10. Wyeomyia (D.) flui.
Lawa River, probably primarily around placer mines of Companie des
Mines d'Or: 6. ‘Wyeomyia (W.) aphobema; 8. Wyeomyia (D.) albosquamata; 9.
Wyeomyia (D.) argenteorostris; 11. Wyeomyia . ) lamellata (Cie des Mines
d'Or); 13. Wyeomyia (D.) roucouyana; 15. Phoniomyia splendida; 23. Seu2.
(C.) bonneae (Cie des Mines d'Or); 25. Culex (C.) usquatus; 27. Culex Culex (C.) su: Ys
rinamensis; 57. Culex (Micr.) eeanletes (Cie des Mines d'Or).
Marowijne River: 25. Culex (C.) usquatus.
Moengo: 5. Toxorhynchites (L.) moengoensis; 17. Sabethes = ) kappleri.
Sara (Sarah) Creek: 15. Phoniomyia splendida.
NICKERIE
Corantijn River: 37. Culex (Mel. ) corentynensis.
SARAMACCA
Kwakoegron: 4. TegorpoeBnee (L.) guianensis; 25. Culex (C.) uaqeeitil:
SURINAME
Dam: 1. Chagasia bonneae; 3. Toxorhynchites (L.) aldrichanus; 18. Sabe-
thes pabevieidse) imperfectus: 22. Aedes is ) arborealis; 60. Culex (Carrol.)
infoliatus.
Gansee: 59. ee (Carrol. ) bonnei.
Kabelstation: 24. Culex (C.) brevispinosus; 36. Culex (Mel. ) coppenamen-
sis; 44. Culex (Mel.) nicceriensis; 47. Culex (Mel.) saramaccensis (Surinam
River): 52. Culex (Mel.) ensiformis; 54. Culex (Mochl.) multispinosus.
Ornamibo: 14. Wyeomyia (D.) surinamensis.
Paramaribo and vicinity: 7. Wyeomyia (W.) fallax; 19. Psorophora ia )
vanhalli; 21. Aedes (F.) argyrothorax (Geiersvlijt estate); 28. Culex (Mel. )
albinensis: 31. Culex (Mel.) vapulans; 35. Culex (Mel.) confundior; 49. Cule Culex
(Mel. ) wepsterae: 50. Culex (Mel.) ybarmis ) ybarmis; 58. Culex (Eub.) tapena.
~ Surinam coast, locality not specified: bal cca ge. Culex (Mel.) eastor.
Surinam, general, locality not specified, probably Paramaribo and vicinity:
2. Anopheles (A.) bonnei; 16. Limatus pseudomethysticus; 29. Culex (Mel.)
maroniensis; 37. Culex (Mel.) corentynensis; 48. Culex (Mel.) terebor; 53.-
Culex (Mochl.) alogistus; 55. Culex (Mochl.) foliafer; 56. Culex (Mochl.) curo-
pinensis; 59. Culex (Carrol.) bonnei.
Surinam, interior of colony; no localities specified but probably Dam, Ka-
belstation, Zander ij I and other localities along railroad are indicated: 32. Cu-
lex (Mel. ) xivylis; 34. Culex (Mel.) comminutor; 39. Culex (Mel.) vaxus; 40.
Culex (Mel. ) bibulus: 41. Culex (Mel. ) idottus; 42. Culex (Mel.) maxinocca;
43. Culex (Mel. J tosimus: 45. Culex (Mel. ) phlabistus: 46. Culex (Mel. ) Culex (Mel.) phio-
gistus; 51. Culex (Mel. Culex (Mel.) jonistes.
Surinam, sandy district: 12. Wyeomyia (D.) occulta; 15. Phoniomyia splen-
dida.
Surinam River: 25. Culex (C.) usquatus.
Zanderij I: 20. Aedes (. Aedes (O.) eucephalaeus; 30. Culex (Mel.) alcocci; 53. Cu-
lex (Mochl.) alogistus.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 67
TOBAGO
List of Species
1. Culex (Melanoconion) decorator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Larvae (53),
locality not specified, May 1905, A. Busck (USNM; lost, see Stone and Knight
1957a: 47). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo internodes.
TRINIDAD
List of Species
1. Anopheles (Kerteszia) bellator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype ©
(44.1) with associated pupal skin, genitalia slide (314) and slide of front tarsus
(659), Pitch Lake, La Brea (St. Patrick), 8 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 10027;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 226). BIONOMICS: Larva in "leaf axil of
century plant growing on pitch lake,'’ probably a terrestrial bromeliad.
2. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) superbus (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [ssp. of
haemorrhoidalis]. TYPE: Holotype & (16-9) with genitalia slide, Sangre
Grande (St. Andrew), F. W. Urich (USNM, 9957; see Stone and Knight 1957c:
200). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads].
3. Toxorhynchites (L.) iris (Knab, 1913) [= mariae]|. TYPE: Holotype 9,
locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 15603). BIONOMICS: Larva in an
epiphytic bromeliad.
4. Toxorhynchites (L.) trinidadensis (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= theobaldi].
TYPE: Holotype ° (B3.2), Sangre Grande (St. Andrew) or San Juan (St.
George), date not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9954; see Stone and Knight
1957c: 200). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
*5. Trichoprosopon (T.) nivipes Theobald, 1901 [= digitatum]. TYPE: ¢, 9,
Agua Santa (St. George), Dec, F. W. Urich (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in cacao pod shells on the ground].
6. Trichoprosopon (Runchomyia) rapax (Dyar’& Knab, 1906) [= frontosum].
TYPE: Lectotype o, Arima (St. George), F. W. Urich (USNM, 9981; selection
of Howard, Dyar and Knab 1915: 166 and Stone 1944: 335). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in bromeliads.
7. Wyeomyia (W.) bromeliarum Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= arthrostigma].
TYPE: Lectotype larval skin with associated pupal skin both mounted on a
slide and associated fragmentary adult, San Juan (St. George), F. W. Urich
(USNM, 9989; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 121). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in bamboo joints.
*8. Wyeomyia (W.) drapetes Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= arthrostigma]. TYPE:
o, 2, near railroad station, San Juan (St. George), June 1905, A. Busck
(USNM, 12181; the lectotype designation of Stone and Knight 1957b: 122 does
not seem to be valid for no specimens collected by F. W. Urich are men-
tioned in the original description; however, it is possible that an error in la-
beling has occurred). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo stump with Sabethes un-
dosus (Busck 41).
*9. Wyeomyia (W.) abascanta (Dyar & Knab, 1908)[= medioalbipes]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Pitch Lake, La Brea (St. Patrick), 8 July 1905, A. Busck
(USNM, 11983; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b: 120). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in "leaf axils of century plant growing on pitch lake, '' probably a terrestrial
bromeliad.
68 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
10. Wyeomyia (W.) telestica Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype & (B
12-3) with associated pupal skin, the larval skin apparently lost, locality and
date not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9985; selection of Stone and Knight
1957b: 126). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
11. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) autocratica Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holo-
type o (B 12-8) with associated pupal skin and genitalia mount, larval skin ap-
parently lost, locality and date not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9986; see
Stone and Knight 1957b: 121). BIONOMICS: Larvae in epiphytic bromeliads.
12. Wyeomyia (D.) melanocephala Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype 9,
locality not specified, June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9998). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae in leaf axils of Araceae].
13. Wyeomyia (D.) pseudopecten Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype
(31), Montserrat (Caroni), 28 June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 9997; see Stone
and Knight 1957b: 125). BIONOMICS: Larvae in red flower bracts of Heliconia.
14. Wyeomyia (D.) cara Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= pseudopecten]. TYPE: Hol-
otype ¢, locality not specified, June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 12182). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in flower bracts of Heliconia].
15. Phoniomyia lassalli (Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1921). TYPE: o, 9,
larva, Sangre Grande (St. Andrew) and Port-of-Spain (St. George), F. W.
Urich; Bonne-Wepster and Bonne proposed this nominal species for trinida-
densis of Dyar and Knab 1906, Howard, Dyar and Knab 1915, and Dyar 1919;
they did not specify any type material but stated ''The specific name trinidaden-
sis must be dropped for Dyar and Knab's specimens and we propose the name
Dyarina lassalli, new species’’; therefore we consider these specimens as syn-
types of lasselli (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
16. Phoniomyia trinidadensis (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: 9, locality not
specified, F. W. Urich (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bromeliads]. |
17. Sabethes (S.) goeldii Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1915 [= belisarioi]. TYPE:
Holotype ¢, locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 19640). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo with small lateral opening].
18. Sabethes (Sabethinus) undosus (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Holotype ?
(B 3.6), locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 8292; see Stone and
Knight 1957b: 118). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bamboo internodes].
19. Psorophora (P.) saeva Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= lineata]. TYPE: Holotype
? (B4-1), locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9964; see Stone and Knight
1955: 286). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in open grassy temporary pools].
20. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) albipes (Theobald, 1907). TYPE: 2, Agua
Santa (St. Andrew), Dec, F. W. Urich (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in tempo-
rary ground pools, probably in wooded areas].
21. Psorophora (Grabhamia) indoctum (Dyar & Knab, 1906) [= cingulata].
TYPE: Holotype o (17.3) with associated pupal skin, Cedros (St. Patrick), 14 |
June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 10026; see Stone and Knight 1955: 285). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in rainwater pool.
22. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) hortator Dyar & Knab, 1907. TYPE: Holotype §,
Arima (St. George), date not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 10250; see Stone
and Knight 1956a: 219). _BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary ground pools].
23. Aedes (.) oligopistus Dyar, 1918. TYPE: Holotype <, locality not
specified, June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 21550). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in temporary ground pools]. :
*24,. Aedes (O.) serratus (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: 0, ?, locality not spe-
cified, F. W. Urich; also from Brazil and British Guiana (BM). BIONOMICS:
ee in temporary rainpools and overflows of ponds and lakes, often in the
shade}.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 69
25. Aedes (Finlaya) insolita (Coquillett, 1906) [= terrens]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9142). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in treeholes].
26. Aedes (F.) laternaria (Coquillett, 1906) [= terrens]|. TYPE: Holotype
co (34), Montserrat (Caroni), June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 8290; see Stone
and Knight 1956a: 220). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treehole in immortelle tree
near houses.
27. Aedes (Howardina) palliatus (Coquillett, 1906) [= fulvithorax]. TYPE:
Holotype °, locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 9140). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in treeholes].
28. Aedes (H.) ioliota Dyar & Knab, 1913. TYPE: Holotype ¢, locality not
specified, F. W. Urich (USNM, 16000). BIONOMICS: Larvae in treeholes.
29. Aedes (H.) sexlineatus (Theobald, 1901). TYPE: Holotype 2 (102), Agua
Santa (St. George), F. W. Urich (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in epiphytic bro-
meliads]. |
30. Haemagogus (Stegoconops) janthinomys Dyar, 1921 [= spegazzinii or
ssp. of capricornii]|. TYPE: Lectotype & (17-1) with associated larval skin
and genitalia slide (219), St. Ann's, Port-of-Spain (St. George), F. W. Urich
(USNM, 24335; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 288). BIQONOMICS: Larvae
in treeholes.
31. Culex (C.) basilicus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= corniger|. TYPE: Lectotype
? (26-10), Arima (St. George), F. W. Urich (USNM, 10021; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957a: 43-44). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a tub near a kitchen.
32. Culex (C.) coronator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larval skin
(7.2) with associated pupal skin and 0’, St. Joseph (St. George), 12 June 1905,
A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in a pool in the woods.
33. Culex (C.) declarator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larval skin
(21.1) with associated pupal skin, & and genitalia slide (268), south coast (St.
Patrick), 20 June 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a:
47). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a lagoon pool of dirty, ill-smelling water distant
from habitations. _ |
34. Culex (C.) inquisitor Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= declarator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (29.1) with associated pupal skin and 2, Montserrat (Caroni),
27 June 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 51). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in a manure ditch behind stable.
35. Culex (C.) extricator Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= inflictus]. TYPE: Larvae
(27) and I 2 (27 xx) with associated larval skin, Cedros (St. Patrick), 23 June
1905, A. Busck (USNM; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 49). BIONOMICS: Larvae
ina bucket used to keep live crabs. |
36. Culex (C.) mollis Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype & (27.4) with
associated fragmentary larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide (233), Sangre
Grande (St. Andrew), Sept 1906, F. W. Urich (USNM, 10022; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957a: 53). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a hollow tree.
37. Culex (C.) biocellatus Theobald, 1903 [= nigripalpus]. TYPE: Holotype
?, locality not specified, C. H. Hewlett (BM; see Stone 1957, Ent. Soc. Wash.,
Proc. 58: 340). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-perma-
nent ground waters].
38. Culex (C.) barbarus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= pipiens quinquefasciatus].
TYPE: Holotype ? (21.3 or 21.5) with associated larval and pupal skins, south
coast (St. Patrick), 20 June 1905, A. Busck (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
a lagoon pool of dirty ill-smelling water far from habitations.
70 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
*39. Culex (Melanoconion) atratus Theobald, 1901. TYPE:0, 2, locality not
specified, F. W. Urich; also from Jamaica (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in permanent and semi-permanent ground waters, including pools in man-
grove swamps].
40. Culex (Mel.) bastagarius Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype & with
associated fragment of larval skin and genitalia slide (275), Laventille, Port-
of-Spain (St. George), F. W. Urich (USNM, 10018; selection of Howard, Dyar
& Knab 1915: 425 and Stone and Knight 1957a: 44). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a
small grassy pool.
41. Culex (Mel.) simulator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Lectotype larva
(47), Arima (St. George), 10 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone
and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a rather large pool in palm
swamp far from civilization.
42. Culex (Mel.) spissipes (Theobald, 1903). TYPE: Holotype ?, locality
not specified, C. W. Hewlett (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent or semi-
permanent ground waters].
*43. Culex (Mochlostyrax) caudelli (Dyar & Knab, 1906). TYPE: Lectotype
larval skin (47), Arima (St. George), 10 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45). BIONOMICS: Larvae in a rather large pool in
palm swamp far from civilization.
44. Culex (Microculex) azymus Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype @°,
Arima (St. George), F. W. Urich (USNM, 10020). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bro-
meliads.
45. Culex (Micr.) consolator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype o, Arima
(St. George), F. W. Urich (USNM, 10019). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
46. Culex (Micr.) daumasturus Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= imitator]. TYPE:
Lectotype fragmentary larval skin (43) with associated fragmentary pupal skin
and @, Pitch Lake, La Brea (St.Patrick), 8 July 1905, A. Busck (USNM; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS: Larvae in "leaf axils of
century plant growing on pitch lake, '' probably a terrestrial bromeliad.
47. Culex (Micr.) vector Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= imitator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin (B 12-1) with associated pupal skin and 0, locality not speci-
fied, F. W. Urich (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 58). BIONO-
MICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
48. Culex (Micr.) inimitabilis Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Larvae, local-
ity not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM; apparently lost, see Stone and Knight
1957a: 51). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
49. Culex (Micr.) stonei Lane & Whitman, 1943. TYPE: Lectotype & (24-
4) with genitalia slide (247), locality not specified, 11 Apr 1905, F. W. Urich
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bro-
meliads]. :
*50. Culex (Aedinus) conservator Dyar & Knab, 1906. TYPE: Holotype lar-
val skin (13.12) with associated pupal skin and o, St. Joseph (St. George), 15
June 1905, A. Busck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in hollow tree.
51. Culex (A.) divisior Dyar & Knab, 1906 [= conservator]. TYPE: Lecto-
type fragmentary larval skin (B 15-6) with associated fragmentary pupal skin
and 0, locality not specified, F. W. Urich (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 47-48). BIONOMICS: Larvae in hollow bamboo joint.
52. Culex (Carrollia) urichii (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Holotype ¢, St.
Ann's valley, Port-of-Spain (St. George), Jan 1906, F. W. Urich (USNM,
9141). BIONOMICS: Larvae in open bamboo joints.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes ges
53. Deinocerites troglodytus Dyar & Knab, 1909 [= magnus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2 (26), Cedros (St. Patrick), 20-23 June 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 12128;
see Stone and Knight 1957c: 197). BIONOMICS: Larvae in crabholes in man-
srove swamp near ocean; water distinctly salty. Adults cling in large num-
bers to walls of holes.
54. Corethrella downsi Lane, 1943. TYPE: Holotype 2, Montevideo, Sans
Souci (St. David), 5 Aug 1942, W. G. Downs (FH). BIONOMICS: Larvae in leaf
axils of bromeliad Aechmaea dichlamydea var. trinitensis.
55. Corethrella melanica Lane & Aitken, 1956. TYPE: Holotype 2, St. Pa-
trick Estate, 3.5 mile post, Arima Valley (St. George), elev. 800 ft, 6 Feb
1954, W. G. Downs (FH, 10556). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bamboo pots and
once from a treehole.
56. Corethrella similans Lane & Aitken, 1956. TYPE: Holotype 2, Tucker
Valley, U. S. Naval Station, Chaguaramas (St. George), 20 Oct 1955, T. H.
G. Aitken (FH, 11429). BIONOMICS: [Larvae habitat not known]. Adults col-
lected at white light traps.
57. Dixella trinitensis (Lane, 1943). TYPE: Holotype &, near Piasco [|Pi-
arco] (St. George), 18 Jan 1942, R. C. Shannon (FH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in forest swamps].
List of Localities
CARONI
Montserrat: 13. Wyeomyia (D.) pseudopecten; 26. Aedes (F.) laternaria;
34. Culex (C.) inquisitor.
ST. ANDREW
Sangre Grande: 2. Toxorhynchites (L.) superbus; 4. Toxorhynchites (L. )
trinidadensis; 15. Phoniomyia lassalli; 36. Culex (C.) mollis.
ST. DAVID
Montevideo, Sans Souci: 54. Corethrella downsi.
ST. GEORGE
Agua Santa, near Arima: 5. Trichoprosopon (T.) nivipes; 20. Psorophora
(J.) albipes; 29. Aedes (H.) sexlineatus.
Arima and Arima Valley: 6. Trichoprosopon (R.) rapax; 22. Aedes (O.)
hortator; 31. Culex (C.) basilicus; 41. Culex (Mel.) simulator; 43. Culex
(Mochl. ) caudelli; 44. Culex (Micr.) azymus; 45. Culex (Micr.) consolator;
55. Corethrella melanica (St. Patrick Estate). 7
Locality not specified: see Trinidad (Locality not specified).
Piarco: 57. Dixella trinitensis.
Port-of-Spain: 15. Phoniomyia lassalli; 30. Haemagogus (S.) janthinomys
(St. Ann's); 40. Culex (Mel.) bastagarius (Laventille); 52. Culex (Carrol. )
urichii (St. Ann's Valley).
St. Joseph: 32. Culex (C.) coronator; 50. Culex (A.) conservator.
San Juan: 7. Wyeomyia (W.) bromeliarum; 8. Wyeomyia (W.) drapetes.
Tucker Valley, U. S. Naval Station, Chaguaramas: 56. Corethrella simi-
lans.
ST. PATRICK
Cedros: 21. Psorophora (G.) indoctum; 35. Culex (C.) extricator; 53.
Deinocerites troglodytus.
12 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
La Brea, Pitch Lake: 1. Anopheles (K.) bellator; 9. Wyeomyia (W.) abas-
canta; 46. Culex (Micr.) daumasturus.
South coast, probably Los Blanquizales Lagoon: 33. Culex (C.) declarator;
38. Culex (C.) barbarus.
TRINIDAD (Locality not specified)
The majority of the collections were probably made in the north part of the
island in the county of St. George in the localities listed above: 3. Toxorhyn-
chites (L.) iris; 10. Wyeomyia (W.) telestica; 11. Wyeomyia (D.) autocratica;
12. Wyeomyia (D.) melanocephala; 14. Wyeomyia (D.) cara; 16. Phoniomyia
trinidadensis; 17. Sabethes (S.) goeldii; 18. Sabethes (Sabethinus) undosus;
19. Psorophora (P.) saeva; 23. Aedes (0. ) oligopistus; 24. Aedes (O.) serra-
tus; 25. Aedes (F.) insolita: 27. Aedes (H.) palliatus; 28. Aedes (H.) Aedes (H.) ioliota;
$7. Culex Culex (C.) biocellatus ) biocellatus; 39. Culex (Mel. ) atratus ) atratus; 42. Culex (Mel.) spis-
sipes; 47. Culex (Micr.) ° Ta tor 8 ales a 48. Culex (Micr. eran es 49. Culex
(Micr.) stonei; 51. Culex (A.) divisior.
VENEZUELA
List of Species
1. Anopheles (A.) guarao Anduze & Capdevielle, 1949. TYPE: <, pupa,
larva, Caripito (Monagas) (A). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent
ground waters].
2. Anopheles (A.) venezuelae Evans, 1922 [= punctimacula]. TYPE: Hol-
otype @, La Cabrera (Carabobo), autumn 1921, M. Nujez Tovar (BM). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in shaded pools, swamps and sluggish streams].
3. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) delta Anduze, 1948 [= aquasalis]. TYPE:
Adults, Pedernales (Delta Amacuro), date not specified (NE). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in brackish water or freshwater in tidal areas].
4. Anopheles (N.) guarauno Anduze, 1948 [= aquasalis]. TYPE: Adults,
Pedernales (Delta Amacuro), date not specified (NE). BIONOMICS: [see delta
above].
5. Anopheles (N.) benarrochi Gabaldon, Cova-Garcia & Lopez, 1941. TYPE:
o, 9, pupa, larva and egg, La Ceiba (Trujillo) (MDM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in residual ponds, sunlit or partially shaded, with much organic mat-
ter].
6. Anopheles (N.) nuneztovari Gabaldon, 1940. TYPE: o, San Carlos (Co-
jedes) (MDM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in muddy pools and small la-
goons fully exposed to sun or partially shaded].
7. Anopheles (N.) rangeli Gabaldon, Cova-Garcia & Lopez, 1940. TYPE:
o, pupa, larva and egg, Puerto Cabello (Carabobo) (MDM). BIONOMICS: | Lar-
vae probably in hoofprints, ponds and small lagoons exposed to sun].
8. Anopheles (Kerteszia) bromelicola Dyar, 1925 [= bellator]. TYPE: Lec-
totype , Manoa Woods (Delta Amacuro), 10 Jan 1910, F. L. de Verteuil
(USNM;; selection of Stone and Knight 1956b: 276). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in bro-
meliads].
9. Anopheles (Lophopodomyia) vargasi Gabaldon, Cova-Garcia & Lopez,
1941. TYPE: o%, 2, pupa, larva and egg, Quebrada de la Cueva del Guacharo
(Monagas) (MDM). BIONOMICS:| Larvae probably in shaded stream bed pools].
10. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) mara (Anduze, 1942) [= solstitialis].
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 73
TYPE: o, La Rivera, Rfo Escalante (Zulia) (IHC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in bromeliads].
11. Wyeomyia (Wyeomyia) caracula Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927. TYPE:
Holotype o’, Mariara (Carabobo), 14 July 1927, M. Nunez Tovar (USNM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads. Holotype bred from larva.
12. Wyeomyia (W.) gaudians Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927. TYPE: Lectotype
oon slide, Mariara (Carabobo), 14 July 1927, M. Nufiez Tovar (USNM; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads. Lec-
totype bred from larva.
13. Wyeomyia (W.) gausapata Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927. TYPE: Holotype
co, Ocumare de la Costa (Aragua), 12 Aug 1927, M. Nufiez Tovar (USNM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larva in bamboo joints but "probably normal to bromelias.' Holo-
type reared from larva.
*14, Wyeomyia (Nunezia) bicornis (Root in Dyar, 1928). TYPE: Holotype &
(108/108. 1) with genitalia slide, larval and pupal skins missing, Ocumare de
la Costa (Aragua), 6 July 1927 (USNM, 44162; see Stone and Knight 1957b: 121).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in bromeliads.
15. Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) pusillum (Lutz, 1928) [= confusa]. TYPE: 9,
pupa, Guayabita, near Turmero (Aragua) (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in broken bamboo]. |
16. Wyeomyia (D.) felicia (Dyar & Nunez Tovar, 1927). TYPE: Lectotype
o, Tio Julian (Aragua), 8 July 1927, M. Nunez Tovar (USNM; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957b: 123). BIONOMICS: Larva in leaf bases of [aroid| '"'El-
ephant's Ear.'' Lectotype bred from larva.
17. Wyeomyia (D.) favor (Dyar & Nufiez Tovar in Dyar 1928) [= jocosa].
TYPE: Holotype , Rancho Grande (probably in Aragua or Carabobo), date not
specified, M. Nunez Tovar (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larva in ''saxicolous Bro-
melias"’ but more probably in an araceous plant. Holotype bred from larva.
18. Wyeomyia (D.) ocumarensis (Lutz, 1928) [= moerbista]. TYPE: 9,
Ocumare de la Costa (Aragua) (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in broken
bamboo, treeholes or leaf axils of plants].
19. Wyeomyia (D.) pampithes (Dyar & Nufiez Tovar in Dyar 1928). TYPE:
Holotype 0, Rancho Grande, date not specified, M. Nufiez Tovar (USNM). BI-
ONOMICS: Larva in ''saxilous Bromeliaceae"’ but more probably in an ara-
ceous plant. Holotype bred from larva.
20. Wyeomyia (D.) bicompressa (Lutz, 1928) [= pseudopecten]. TYPE: &,
Turmero (Aragua) (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in flower bracts of
Heliconia].
21. Wyeomyia (D.) serratoria (Dyar & Nuifiez Tovar, 1927). TYPE: Holo-
type ?, Villegas (Aragua), 9 Aug 1927, M. Nufiez Tovar (USNM). BIONOMICS:
Larva in bamboo joint. Holotype bred from larva.
22. Wyeomyia (D.) taurepana Anduze, 1941. TYPE: o, headwaters of Rio
Surukim Soe (Bolivar) (DPFA). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bro-
ken bamboo, treeholes or leaf axils of plants].
23. Sabethes (S.) paraitepuyensis Anduze, 1941. TYPE: ¢, Paraitepui
(Bolivar) (DPFA). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes with small lat-
eral opening].
24. Sabethes (Sabethoides) rangeli (Surcouf & Gonzalez-Rincones, 1911)
[= chloropterus]. TYPE: ?, Maturin (Monagas), date not specified, M. Nunez
Tovar (MNHP). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes or bamboo with
small lateral opening].
25. Mansonia (Rynchotaenia) venezuelensis (Theobald in Surcouf, 1912).
74 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
TYPE: 2 9, Cafio de la Viuda (MNHP and GDZ). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably attached to rootlets of grasses and other herbaceous plants in mud in very
shallow water of edges of swamps, ponds and streams].
26. Uranotaenia briseis Dyar, 1925. TYPE: Holotype 2, Catatumbo River
(Zulia), date not specified, L. H. Dunn (USNM, 28477). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in swamps].
27. Uranotaenia hystera Dyar & Knab, 1913. TYPE: Holotype *, Manoa
(Delta Amacuro), Jan 1910, F. L. de Verteuil (USNM, 16001). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in large swamps or marshes].
28. Psorophora (P.) blanchardi Surcouf & Gonzalez-Rincones, 1911 [= lin-
eata]. TYPE: o%, 2, Maturfn (Monagas) (MNHP). BIONOMICS: [Larvae prob-
ably in sunlit grassy temporary pools].
29. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) tovari Evans, 1922 [= cyanescens|]. TYPE:
2°, region of Maracay (Aragua), 1921, M. Nifiez Tovar (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in temporary grassy ground pools in open areas].
30. Psorophora (Grabhamia) trigonophorus (Lutz, 1928) [= confinnis].
TYPE: o, ¢, San Jacinto (Aragua) (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
open temporary ground pools of all types, especially hoofprints, road ruts and
irrigation overflows]. : 3
31. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) traversus Dyar, 1925 [= angustivittatus]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, sand bar on Zulia River (Zulia), date not specified, L. H. Dunn
(USNM, 28480; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 226). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in temporary rainpools and overflows open to sun].
32. Aedes (Finlaya) upatensis Anduze & Hecht, 1943. TYPE: o&, region of
Upata, Distrito Piar Bolivar) (FH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in rockholes].
*33. Aedes (Soperia) dominicii (Rangel & Romero-Sierra, 1907). TYPE: 9,
Hacienda El Paraiso on Rio Ananco [there is a Rio Anaco in the state of Anzoa-
tegui] (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in bromeliads].
34, Aedes (Howardina) argyrites Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, locality, date and collector not specified (USNM). BIONOMICS: | Lar-
vae probably in bromeliads or treeholes].
35. Aedes (H.) tachirensis Anduze, 1947 [= fulvithorax]|. TYPE: ?, Las
Mesas de Seboruco, Dept. Jauregui Tachira (Tachira) (A). BIONOMICS: |Lar-_
vae probably in treeholes].
36. Haemagogus (Haemagogus) celeste Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927 [= splen-
dens]. TYPE: Lectotype o (2270, "No. 3") with pupal skin (2270) [uncertain
association| and genitalia slide (2770), Maracay (Aragua), 11 Nov 1926, M.
Nufiez Tovar (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 287). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in treeholes or broken bamboo].
37. Culex (C.) beauperthuyi Anduze, 1943. TYPE: oc, 2, larva, pupa, Bor-
burata (Carabobo) (IHC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-
permanent ground waters]. |
38. Culex (C.) albertoi Anduze, 1943 [= coronator]. TYPE: o, Mesa de
Escalante, near Rio Guaruries, Distrito Tovar (Merida) (IHC). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in ground waters]. |
39. Culex (C.) maracayensis Evans, 1923. TYPE: Holotype “, Maracay
(Aragua), Oct 1922, M. Nufez Tovar (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
permanent or semi-permanent ground waters]. |
40. Culex (Melanoconion) amitis Komp, 1936. TYPE: Lectotype “ genitalia
slide, Quiriquire (Monagas), 14 June 1935 (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 43). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-per-
manent ground waters]. Lectotype taken by sweeping.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes | 75
41. Culex (Mel.) innominatus Evans, 1924 [= bastagarius]. TYPE: <, Palo
Negro (Aragua), 30 Aug 1922, M. Nufez Tovar, Mariara (Carabobo), 11 Aug
1922, M. Nufiez Tovar; also from Brazil (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in grassy pools and stream margins]. 7
42. Culex (Mel.) macaronensis Dyar & Nifiez Tovar, 1927 [= conspirator].
TYPE: Holotype o and genitalia slide [pinned specimen missing], Macaro, date
not specified, M. Nufez Tovar (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
grassy edges of streams or in rockholes].
43. Culex (Mel.) inducens Root in Dyar, 1928 [= conspirator]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o& (157.1 or 157. 2) abdomen on slide (the one farthest from the determi-
nation label), association with corresponding pinned specimen uncertain, Ma-
racay (Aragua), date and collector not specified (USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 51). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in rockholes or in grassy
edges of streams].
44. Culex (Mel.) creole Anduze, 1949. TYPE: o, Caripito (Monagas) (FH).
BIONOMICS: | Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters|.
45. Culex (Mel.) vogelsangi Anduze, 1949 [= elevator]. TYPE: <, Caripito
eh ei (A). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in springs or rockholes in the
shade}.
46. Culex (Mel.) ernsti Anduze, 1949. TYPE: o’, Caripito (Monagas) (A).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters |.
47. Culex (Mel.) tovari Evans, 1924 [= erraticus]. TYPE: Holotype 0, Pa-
lo Negro (Aragua), 30 Aug 1922, M. Nifiez Tovar (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
probably in all types of grassy ground waters].
48. Culex (Mel.) terepaima Anduze, 1949 [= idottus]. TYPE: o, El Valle
(Distrito Federal) (FH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-
permanent ground waters]. )
49. Culex (Mel.) lucifugus Komp, 1936. TYPE: Holotype o and genitalia
slide [pinned specimen missing], Quiriquire, near Maturin (Monagas), 14 June
1935 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent
ground waters].
50. Culex (Mel.) pifanoi Anduze, 1949. TYPE: o, Caripito (Monagas) (A).
BIONOMICS: [ Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent ground waters|.
51. Culex (Mel.) venezuelensis Anduze, 1949. TYPE: co, Caripito (Mona-
gas) (FH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-permanent
ground waters].
52. Culex (Mel.) loturus Dyar, 1925 [= zeteki]|. TYPE: Holotype o, Cata-
tumbo River (Zulia), date not specified, L. H. Dunn (USNM, 28476). BIONO-
MICS: [Larvae probably in grassy, more or less permanent, ground waters].
53. Culex (Mochlostyrax) unicornis Root in Dyar, 1928. TYPE: Lectotype
o& genitalia on slide G2. | ? 1]), Maracay (Aragua), 27 June 1927 (USNM; se-
lection of Rozeboom and Komp 1950: 97; see Stone and Knight 1957a: 57). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in more or less permanent ground waters].
54. Culex (Microculex) kukenan Anduze, 1942. TYPE: o, 9, La Gran Sa-
bana, Surukum [Surucin] (Bolfvar) (FH). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
bromeliads].
55. Culex (Aedinus) surukumensis Anduze, 1941 [= conservator]. TYPE:
o, Rio Surukum [Suructn|] (Bolivar) (DPFA). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
in treeholes or bromeliads].
56. Culex (A.) paganus Evans, 1923. TYPE: o, 9, "from villages" (Ara-
gua), 23 Aug 1922, M. Nufiez Tovar (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in
treeholes or bromeliads].
16 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
57. Culex (Carrollia) bihaicolus Dyar & Nufiez Tovar, 1927. TYPE: o, 9,
Ocumare de la Costa (Aragua), July 1927, M. Nunez Tovar (LU). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in flower bracts of red-flowered Heliconia. ,
58. Culex (Carrol.) mathesoni Anduze, 1942. TYPE: o, Pefion de Parite-
pui (Bolivar) HC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in treeholes, broken bam-
boo, plant parts on the ground or leaf axils].
09. Culex romeroi Surcouf & Gonzalez-Rincones, 1912; a new name for
nigritulus of Romero Sierra, 1907. TYPE: 2, no specimens seen by authors,
Caracas (D. F.) (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent or semi-
permanent ground waters].
60. Edwardsops stonei (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype “, Maracaibo (Zu-
lia), Sept 1938 or Jan 1940 (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in perma-
nent or semi-permanent ground pools, possibly in treeholes].
61. Dixella venezuelensis (Lane, 1942). TYPE: Holotype &, Maracay
(Aragua), July 1927, F. M. Root (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in vege-
tation in margins of streams, ponds, lakes or swamps].
List of Localities
ARAGUA |
Guayabita (Cafio), near Turmero: 15. Wyeomyia (D.) pusillum.
Locality not specified: 56. Culex (A.) paganus.
Maracay: 29. Psorophora (J.) tovari; 36. Haemagogus (H.) celeste; 39. Cu-
lex (C.) maracayensis; 43. Culex (Mel.) inducens; 53. Culex (Mochl.) unicor-
nis; 61. Dixella venezuelensis.
Ocumare de la Costa: 13. Wyeomyia (W.) gausapata; 14. Wyeomyia (N.) bi-
cornis; 18. Wyeomyia (D.) ocumarensis; 57. Culex (Carrol.) bihaicolus.
Palo Negro: 41. Culex (Mel.) innominatus; 47. Culex (Mel.) tovari.
San Jacinto: 30. Psorophora (G.) trigonophorus.
Tio Julian: 16. Wyeomyia (D.) felicia.
Turmero: 20. Wyeomyia (D.) bicompressa.
Villegas (Cafio): 21. Wyeomyia (D.) serratoria.
See also Venezuela (General)
BOLIVAR
Paraitepui [Perai-tepui|: 23. Sabethes (S.) paraitepuyensis; 58. Culex
(Carrol. ) mathesoni (Pefion de Paritepui).
Suructn (Rio), as Surukim: 22. Wyeomyia (D.) taurepana; 54. Culex (Mi-
cro.) kukenan (La Gran Sabana); 55. Culex (A.) surukumensis.
Upata, Distrito Piar: 32. Aedes (F.) upatensis.
CARABOBO
Borburata: 37. Culex (C.) beauperthuyi.
La Cabrera: 2. Anopheles (A.) venezuelae. |
Mariara: 11. Wyeomyia (W.) caracula; 12. Wyeomyia (W.) gaudians; 41.
Culex (Mel. ) innominatus.
Puerto Cabello: 7. Anopheles (N.) rangeli.
COJEDES
San Carlos: 6. Anopheles (N.) nuneztovari.
DELTA AMACURO (TER. FED. )
Manoa: 8. Anopheles (K.) bromelicola; 27. Uranotaenia hystera.
Pedernales: 3. Anopheles (N.) delta; 4. Anopheles (N. ) guarauno.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes U1
DISTRITO FEDERAL
Caracas: 59. Culex romeroi.
El Valle, near Caracas: 48. Culex (Mel. ) terepaima.
MERIDA
Mesa de Escalante, near Rio Guaruries, Distrito Tovar: 38. Culex (C.) al-
bertoi.
MONAGAS
Caripito: 1. Anopheles (A.) guarao; 44. Culex (Mel.) creole; 45. Culex
(Mel.) vogelsangi; 46. Culex (Mel.) ernsti; 50. Culex (Mel.) pifanoi; 51. Cu-
lex (Mel. ) venezuelensis.
Cueva El Guacharo (Quebrada de la): 9. Anopheles (L.) vargasi.
Maturin: 24. Sabethes (Sabethoides) rangeli; 28. Psorophora (P.) blanchardi.
Quiriquire: 40. Culex (Mel.) amitis; 49. Culex (Mel. ) lucifugus.
TACHIRA :
Las Mesas de Seboruco, Dept. Jaurequi: 35. Aedes (H.) tachirensis.
TRUJILLO
La Ceiba: 5. Anopheles (N.) benarrochi.
VENEZUELA (General)
Ananco (Rio), Hacienda El Paraiso [? Rio Anaco, state of Anzoatequi]: 33.
Aedes (Sop. ) dominicii.
Locality not specified: 34. Aedes (H.) argyrites.
Macaro [? Macareo, Delta Amacuro]: 42. Culex (Mel. ) macaronensis.
Rancho Grande; probably in Aragua or Carabobo: 17. Wyeomyia (D.) favor;
19. Wyeomyia (D.) pampithes.
Viuda (Cafio de la); probably in Delta Amacuro or Monagas: 25. Mansonia
(R.) venezuelensis.
ZULIA
Catatumbo (Rio): 26. Uranotaenia briseis; 52. Culex (Mel. ) loturus.
La Rivera, Rio Escalante: 10. Toxorhynchites (L.) mara.
Maracaibo: 60. Edwardsops stonei.
Zulia (Rio): 31. Aedes (O.) traversus.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
List of Species
1. Mansonia (M.) flaveola (Coquillett, 1906). TYPE: Holotype o, St.
Thomas, Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 8288). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably
attached to floating vegetation (Pistia) in permanent ground waters].
2. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) virginensis Dyar, 1922 [= tortilis]. TYPE: Holo-
type 9, St. Thomas, Aug 1905, A. Busck (USNM, 24898). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in temporary rainpools].
3. Aedes (Stegomyia) fasciatus (Fabricius, 1805) [= aegypti]. TYPE: Adult,
"Habitat in Americae insulis Mus. Dom. Lund"; probably from St. Croix
(ZMC). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in domestic artificial containers].
4. Culex (C.) petersoni Dyar, 1920 [= bahamensis]. TYPE: Holotype o
(12), Leinster Bay, St. John, 22 Oct 1919, E. Peterson (USNM, 22689). BI-
ONOMICS: Larvae in large shallow pond very near the seashore.
78 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 5, 1965
List of Localities
St. Croix: 3. Aedes (Steg. ) fasciatus.
St. John: 4. Culex (C.) petersoni (Leinster Bay).
St. Thomas: 1. Mansonia (M.) flaveola; 2. Aedes (.) virginensis.
REFERENCES CITED
Arnett, Ross H.
1947. Notes on the distribution, habits and habitats of some Panama mos-
quitoes (Diptera, Culicidae). New York Ent. Soc., J. 40: 185-200.
1948. Notes on the distribution, habits and habitats of some Panama culi-
cines (Diptera: Culicidae). New York Ent. Soc., J. 51: 175-193.
Belkin, John N. and C. L. Hogue
1959. A review of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Calif. U., P. Ent. 14: 411-458.
Belkin, John N., C. L. Hogue, P. Galindo, T. H. G. Aitken, R. X. Schick and
W. A. Powder :
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae) II. Methods for the collection,
rearing and preservation of mosquitoes. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contr. 1 (2):
19-78. :
Belkin, John N., R. X. Schick, P. Galindo and T. H. G. Aitken
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae) I. A project for a systematic
study of the mosquitoes of Middle America. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contr.
1(2): 1-17.
Bonne, C. and J. Bonne-Wepster
1925. Mosquitoes of Surinam . . . Roy. Colon. Inst. Amsterdam, Meded.
21. 558 p. (Afd. Trop. Hyg. 13).
Dyar, Harrison G. |
1921. The genus Haemagogus Williston (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor In-
scitiae Menstruus 9: 101-114.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Washington, Carnegie Inst.
(P. 387). 616 p.
Dyar, Harrison G. and F. Knab
1909. Descriptions of some new species and a new genus of American mos-
quitoes. Smithsn. Misc. Collect. 52: 253-266.
Foote, Richard H.
1954. The larvae and pupae of the mosquitoes belonging to the Culex sub-
genera Melanoconion and Mochlostyrax. U.S. Dept. Agr., Tech. B.
1091. 126 p.
Galindo, Pedro, S. J. Carpenter and H. Trapido
1951. Ecological observations on forest mosquitoes of an endemic yellow
fever area in Panama. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 31: 98-137.
Howard, Leland O., H. G. Dyar and F. Knab
1915. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies.
Vol. 3. Washington, Carnegie Inst. (P. 159). 523 p.
Komp, William H. W.
1937. The species of the subgenus Kerteszia of Anopheles. Ent. Soc. Amer.,
Ann. 30: 492-524.
1955. Notes on Haemagogus iridicolor Dyar (Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc.
Wash., Proc. 57: 29-31.
Belkin et al: Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes 79
Komp, William H. W. and L. E. Rozeboom
1951. Descriptions of eight new species of Culex subgenus Melanoconion
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 53: 121-137.
Lane, John
1953. Neotropical Culicidae. Vol. 1. Sao Paulo, U. Sao Paulo, 548 p.
Mattingly, Peter F.
1955. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Tropical Institute at Ham-
burg. Roy. Ent. Soc. London, Proc. (B) 24: 27-33.
Pratt, Harry D. and E. L. Seabrook
1952. The occurrence of Culex iolambdis Dyar in Florida and Puerto Rico,
with a description of the larva (Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash.,
Proc. 54: 27-32.
Rozeboom, Lloyd E. and W. H. W. Komp
1950. A review of the species of Culex of the subgenus Melanoconion (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 43: 75-114.
Russell, Paul F., L. E. Rozeboom and A. Stone
1943. Keys to the anopheline mosquitoes of the world. Philadelphia, Amer.
Ent. Soc. - 152: p.
Stone, Alan
1944. Notes on the genus Trichoprosopon (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev. de Ent.
15: 335-341.
1957. Corrections in the taxonomy and nomenclature of mosquitoes (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 58: 333-344.
1961. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement I
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 63: 29-52.
1963. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supplement II
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 65: 117-140.
Stone, Alan and K. L. Knight
1955. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Museum:
I, The genera Armigeres, Psorophora and Haemagogus (Diptera, Culi-
cidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 45: 282-289.
1956a. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: II, The genus Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J.
46: 213-228.
1956b. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: HI, The genera Anopheles and Chagasia (Diptera, Culicidae).
Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 46: 276-280.
195%7a. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: IV, The genus Culex (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J.
47: 42-59.
1957b. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: V, The Sabethini (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 47:
117-126.
1957c. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: VI, Miscellaneous genera, addenda, and summary. Wash. Acad.
Sci., J. 47: 196-202.
Stone, Alan, K. L. Knight and H. Starcke
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culicidae).
Washington, Ent. Soc. Amer. (Thomas Say Found. P. 6). 358 p.
80
SYSTEMATIC INDEX
The names of the 752 topotypic Middle American species are in roman type.
They are indexed individually with reference to the appropriate genus and sub-
genus (where applicable), as well as classified under the latter. In the classi-
fied portions, junior synonyms, subspecies or infrasubspecies are also listed
under the name of the senior synonym or valid taxonomic species as given in
the catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Stone, Knight and Starcke 1959;
Stone 1961, 1963). An asterisk (*) denotes a type species of a generic group
taxon and a number sign (#) a replacement name. Extralimital senior syno-
nyms are underscored and are listed only in the classified portion.
*abascanta, Wyeomyia (W.), 67 aurites (inaequalis), 31
abebela, Wyeomyia (W.), 34 busckii, 17
abia, Wyeomyia (W.), 16 thaxteri, 26
ablabes, Wyeomyia (W.), 35 tracei [also Soperia], 33
ablechra, Wyeomyia (W.), 22 fulvithorax
abrachys, Wyeomyia (W.), 46 palliatus, 69
adelpha, Wyeomyia (W.), 11 tachirensis, 74
advieri, Culex (Mel.), 27 inaequalis, 31
AEDES (FINLAYA) [21] aureostriatus, 31
aurites, 31
ioliota, 69
palliatus (fulvithorax), 69
quadrivittatus, 28
septemstriatus, 42
sexlineatus, 69
argyrothorax, 63
“ homoeopus, 12
atropalpus
epactius, 36
perichares, 12
clarki (leucocelaenus), 50
draconarius (fluviatilis), 23 aga a
sacle Gi ropaloe eG tachirensis (fulvithorax), 74
thaxteri (busckii), 26
tracei (busckii) [also Soperia], 33
*walkeri, 31
AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS) [38]
angustivittatus, 12
argentescens, 36
fluviatilis :
draconarius, 23
heteropus (terrens), 12
homoeopus (argyrothorax), 12
insolita (terrens), 69
knabi, 36 t 36
kompi, 36 Rene ied 74
laternaria (terrens), 69 eels: ae
sea argentescens (angustivittatus), 36
leucocelaenus fue tiertilis) $1
a auratus (tortilis),
balteatus (tortilis), 18
bimaculatus
rozeboomi, 36
bracteatus (tortilis), 15
camposanus, 20
condolescens, 3
cuneatus (angustivittatus), 36
eucephalaeus, 63
euiris, 8
euplocamus, 12
habanicus (tortilis), 15
hastatus, 50
hemisurus (scapularis), 30
hortator, 68
indolescens (scapularis), 15
martineti, 23
mathisi (serratus), 25
meridionalis (serratus), 12
leucotaeniatus, 50
lithoecetor, 50
*mediovittatus, 18
uncatus, 31
metoecopus (terrens), 20
perichares (atropalpus), 12
podographicus (terrens), 22
ramirezi, 36
scutellalbum, 9
terrens
heteropus, 12
insolita, 69
laternaria, 69
metoecopus, 20
podographicus, 22
thorntoni, 42
thorntoni (terrens), 42
uncatus (mediovittatus), 31
: milleri, 8
ungtenstey 1 | ‘muelleri, 36
AEDES (HOWARDINA) [17+ 1] niger (taeniorhynchus), 3
albonotatus, 18 nubilis (serratus), 5
allotecnon, 12 obturbator, 3
arborealis, 63 oligopistus, 68
argyrites, 74 pertinax (serratus), 30
aureostriatus (inaequalis), 31 pix, 7
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
plutocraticus (tortilis), 3
polyagrus (serratus), 50
portoricensis (taeniorhynchus), 60
*purpureipes, 36
quasiserratus (serratus), 31
rozeboomi (bimaculatus), 36
scapularis
hemisurus, 30
indolescens, 15
*serratus, 5, 68
mathisi, 25
meridionalis, 12
nubilis, 5
pertinax, 30
polyagrus, 50
quasiserratus, 31
shannoni, 36
*taeniorhynchus, 36
niger, 3
portoricensis, 60
tortilis, 31
auratus, 31
. balteatus, 18
bracteatus, 15
habanicus, 15
plutocraticus, 3
virginensis, 77
traversus (angustivittatus), 74
virginensis (tortilis), 77
AEDES (SOPERIA) [4-1]
*dominicii, 74
pseudodominicii, 9
pseudodominicii (dominicii), 9
tracei [also Howardina], 33
whitmorei, 9
AEDES (STEGOMYIA) [4]
aegypti
fasciatus, 41, 77
frater, 33, 41
luciensis, 6, 60
mosquito, 15
fasciatus (aegypti), 41, 77
frater (aegypti), 33, 41
luciensis (aegypti), 6, 60
mosquito (aegypti), 15
aequatorialis, Wyeomyia (W.), 20
aequatorianna, Uranotaenia, 20
aequatorianna, Wyeomyia, 20
affirmatus, Haemagogus (L.), 36
#agitator, Culex (Mochl.), 15
aglischrus, Culex (C.), 9
agnostips, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
agyrtes, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
aikenii, Culex (C.), 63
aikenii, Culex (Mel.), 6
albertoi, Culex (C.), 74
albimanus, Anopheles (N.), 17
albinensis, Culex (Mel.), 63
albipes, Anopheles (N.), 2, 4, 30
albipes, Psorophora (J.), 68
albocaerulea, Wyeomyia (D.), 23
*albomaculatus, Haemagogus (S.), 6
albonotatus, Aedes (H.), 18
*albosquamata, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
alcocci, Culex (Mel.), 63
aldrichanus, Toxorhynchites (L.), 62
alfaroi, Culex (Mel.), 12
allostigma, Culex (L.), 50
allotecnon, Aedes (H.), 12
alogistus, Culex (Mochl.), 65
alticola, Haemagogus (S.), 37
amazonica, Wyeomyia, 20
americanus, Culex (A.), 25
amitis, Culex (Mel.), 74
ananacola, Corethrella, 56
anastasionis, Haemagogus (S.), 12
andinum, Trichoprosopon (T.), 19
andinus, Haemagogus (S.), 9
andinus, Limatus, 20
andropus, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
aneles, Culex (Mel.), 53
angustivittatus, Aedes (O.), 12
annulipes, Culex (Mel.), 32
anomalophyllus, Anopheles (N.), 43
ANOPHELES (ANOPHELES) [27]
apicimacula, 27
aztecus, 34
bifoliata (pseudopunctipennis), 7
bonnei, 61
- chiriquiensis (parapunctipennis), 43
cricillium (hectoris), 34
eiseni, 27
niveopalpis, 43
fausti, 34
gabaldoni, 34
*orabhamii, 30
guarao, 72
guatemalensis (parapunctipennis), 28
hectoris, 28
cricillium, 34
levicastilloi (pseudopunctipennis), 19
malefactor (punctimacula), 43
neomaculipalpus, 43
niveopalpis (eiseni), 43
parapunctipennis, 34
chiriquiensis, 43
guatemalensis, 28
pseudopunctipennis, 26
bifoliata, 7
levicastilloi, 19
rivadeneirai, 19
willardi, 34
punctimacula, 43
malefactor, 43
strigimacula, 34
venezuelae, 72
punctipennis
stonei, 34
rivadeneirai (pseudopunctipennis), 19
stonei (punctipennis), 34
strigimacula (punctimacula), 34
venezuelae (punctimacula), 72
vestitipennis, 28
willardi (pseudopunctipennis), 34
*xelajuensis, 28
ANOPHELES (KERTESZIA) [7]
anoplus (homunculus), 8
bambusicolus, 7
bellator, 67
bromelicola, 72
81
82 Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
bromelicola (bellator), 22
homunculus, 8
anoplus, 8
hylephilus (neivai), 44
neivai, 44
hylephilus, 44
ANOPHELES (LOPHOPODOMYIA) [4]
gomezdelatorrei, 19
oiketorakras, 8
*squamifemur, 8
vargasi, 72
ANOPHELES (NYSSORHYNCHUS) [17]
albimanus, 17
albipes, 2, 4, 30
bisignatus, 34
cubensis, 14
gorgasi, 43
#tarsimaculatus (for albipes), 2, 4, 30
trisignatus, 34
albipes (albimanus), 2, 4, 30
anomalophyllus, 43
aquacaelestis (oswaldoi), 44
aquasalis, 44
delta, 72
guarauno, 72
benarrochi, 72
bisignatus (albimanus), 34
cubensis (albimanus), 14
delta (aquasalis), 72
evansae
Iloydi, 44
gorgasi (albimanus), 43
guarauno (aquasalis), 72
ininii, 23
lloydi (evansae), 44
oswaldoi
aquacaelestis, 44
nuneztovari, 72
rangeli, 72
sanctielii, 23
#tarsimaculatus (albimanus), 2, 4, 30
trisignatus (albimanus), 34
ANOPHELES (STETHOMYIA) [3]
canorii, 23
kompi, 43
*nimbus, 4
anoplus, Anopheles (K.), 8
antiguae, Psorophora (G.), 3
antillarum, Wyeomyia, 27
antillum, Sayomyia, 16
antillummagnorum, Culex (A.), 16
apeteticus, Culex (Mel.), 52
*aphobema, Wyeomyia (W.), 62
apicalis, Uranotaenia, 3
apicimacula, Anopheles (A.), 27
*aporonoma, Wyeomyia (D.), 22
appendiculata, Corethrella, 32
aquacaelestis, Anopheles (N.), 44
aquasalis, Anopheles (N.), 44
arborea, Wyeomyia (Dav.), 47
arborealis, Aedes (H.), 63
arboricolus, Culex (Mochl.), 55
argenteorostris, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
argentescens, Aedes (O.), 36
argyrites, Aedes (H.), 74
argyromeris, Haemagogus (H.), 50
argyrothorax, Aedes (F.), 63
argyrura, Wyeomyia (W.), 14
aseyehae, Culex (C.), 3
asulleptus, Limatus, 5
atra, Dixella, 57
*atratus, Culex (Mel.), 32, 70
auratus, Aedes (O.), 31
aureostriatus, Aedes (H.), 31
aurilatus, Culex (Mel.), 24
aurites, Aedes (H.), 31
autocratica, Wyeomyia (D.), 68
aztecus, Anopheles (A.), 34
azuayus, Culex (C.), 21
azymus, Culex (Micr.), 70
babohoyensis, Culex (Carrol.), 21.
bahama, Wyeomyia (W.), 3
bahamensis, Culex (C.), 3
balteatus, Aedes (O.), 18
bamborum, Culex (A.), 10
bambusicolus, Anopheles (K.), 7
barbarus, Culex (C.), 69
baria, Wyeomyia (W.), 22
basalis, Uranotaenia, 35
basilicus, Culex (C.), 69
bastagarius, Culex (Mel.), 70
batesi, Culex (Mel.), 9
bathana, Chagasia, 43
beauperthuyi, Culex (C.), 74
bellator, Anopheles (K.), 67
benarrochi, Anopheles (N.), 72
bibulus, Culex (Mel.), 64
bicolor, Uranotaenia, 7
bicompressa, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
*bicornis, Wyeomyia (N.), 73
bifoliata, Anopheles (A.), 7
bifoliata, Culex (A.), 56
*bigoti, Culex (L.), 37
bihaicolus, Culex (Carrol.), 76
bilobatus, Culex (Mel.), 54
biocellatus, Culex (C.), 69
bipartipes, Sabethes (S.), 17
bisignatus, Anopheles (N.), 34
*bisulcatus, Culex (A.), 27
blanchardi, Psorophora (P.), 74
blanda, Corethrella, 56
bodkini, Wyeomyia (W.), 5
bonneae, Chagasia, 61
bonneae, Culex (C.), 63
bonnei, Anopheles (A.), 61
bonnei, Culex (Carrol.), 65
bonneti, Culex (Mel.), 27
borinqueni, Culex (Mel.), 60
boshelli, Haemagogus (H.), 9
bracteatus, Aedes (O.), 15
breviculus, Culex (A.), 25
brevispinosus, Culex (C.), 63
briseis, Uranotaenia, 74
bromeliarum, Wyeomyia (W.), 67
bromelicola, Anopheles (K.), 72
browni, Culex (A.), 55
busckii, Aedes (H.), 17
cacodela, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
cacophrades, Limatus, 49
calosomata, Uranotaenia, 49
camposanus, Aedes (O.), 20
camposi, Culex (C.), 21
camptocomma, Wyeomyia (W.), 8
*cancer, Deinocerites, 32
canfieldi, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
canorii, Anopheles (S.), 23
cara, Wyeomyia (D.), 68
caracula, Wyeomyia (W.), 73
caraibeus, Culex (C.), 4
carcinophilus, Culex (Mel.), 18
caribeanus, Culex (Mel.), 52
carmodyae, Culex (C.), 18
cauchensis, Culex (A.), 25
*caudelli, Culex (Mochl.), 70
cavernicolus, Culex (Mel.), 24
cayennensis, Culex (Mel.), 25
celaenocephala, Wyeomyia (W.), 28
celeste, Haemagogus (H.), 74
CHAGASIA [2]
bathana, 43
bonneae, 61
chalcocephala, Wyeomyia (D.), 28
chalcocorystes, Culex (A.), 56
chalcospilans, Haemagogus (H.), 50
champerico, Psorophora (J.), 28
changuinolae, Culex (Mel.), 52
charmion, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
chidesteri, Culex (C.), 51
chiriquiensis, Anopheles (A.), 43
chloropterus, Sabethes (Sabethoides), 20
chresta, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
chroiopus, Sabethes (S.), 5
chryselatus, Culex (Micr.), 65
chrysomus, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
chrysonotum, Culex (Mel.), 52
cilipes, Psorophora (P.), 41
cingulata, Psorophora (G.), 41
*circumcincta, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
clarki, Aedes (F.), 50
*clasoleuca, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
clavulus, Dixella, 61
coatzacoalcos, Uranotaenia, 35
codiocampa, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
coenonus, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
coffini, Psorophora (J.), 3
colombiana, Wyeomyia (A.), 8
colombiensis, Culex (Mochl.), 10
colsoni, Wyeomyia (W.), 33
comatus, Culex (Mel. ),. 24
commevynensis, Culex (Mel.), 64
comminutor, Culex (Mel.), 64
complosa, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
compta, Wyeomyia (D.), 23
conchita, Wyeomyia (W.), 14
condolescens, Aedes (O.), 3
confundior, Culex (Mel.), 64
*conservator, Culex (A.), 70
consolator, Culex (Micr.), 70
conspirator, Culex (Mel.), 38
consternator, Culex (Micr.), 38
cooki, Uranotaenia, 29
coppenamensis, Culex (Mel.), 64
corentynensis, Culex (Mel.), 64
CORETHRELLA [13]
ananacola, 56
appendiculata, 32
blanda, 56
downsi, 71
dyari, 56
izquierdoi, 39
jenningsi, 56
laneana, 39
melanica, 71
similans, 71
stonei, 56
tripunctata, 60
whartoni, 39
coronator, Culex (C.), 69
corrigani, Culex (A.), 56
coticula, Mansonia (R.), 49
cotopaxensis, Trichoprosopon (R.), 19
creole, Culex (Mel.), 75
cricillium, Anopheles (A.), 34
crybda, Culex (Mel.), 9 ©
cubensis, Anopheles (N.), 14
cubensis, Culex (C.), 15
cubensis, Culex (Mochl.), 15
cuclyx, Culex (Mel.), 52
culebrae, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
CULEX (AEDINUS) [14]
americanus, 25
antillummagnorum, 16
*bisulcatus, 27
antillummagnorum (americanus), 16
bamborum, 10
bifoliata (conservator), 56
*bisulcatus (americanus), 27
breviculus, 25
browni, 55
cauchensis, 25
chalcocorystes (corrigani), 56
*conservator, 70
bifoliata, 56
divisior, 70
surukumensis, 75
corrigani, 56
chalcocorystes, 56
divisior (conservator), 70
*latisquama, 13
paganus, 75
surukumensis (conservator), 75
CULEX (CARROLLIA) [9]
babohoyensis, 21
bihaicolus, 76
bonnei, 65
infoliatus, 65
manaensis, 25
mathesoni, 76
metempsytus, 13
secundus, 56
urichii, 70
CULEX (CULEX) [84]
aglischrus (maracayensis), 9
83
84
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
aikenii (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 63 jubilator (declarator), 51
albertoi (coronator), 74 #lachrimans (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 63
aseyehae (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 3 lactator (corniger), 37
azuayus, 21 lamentator (secutor), 18
bahamensis, 3 lateropunctata (mollis), 6
*eleuthera, 3 laticlasper, 51
petersoni, 77 lepostenis (mollis), 52
barbarus (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 69 levicastilloi, 21
basilicus (corniger), 69 loquaculus (corniger), 51
beauperthuyi, 74 maracayensis, 74
biocellatus (nigripalpus), 69 aglischrus, 9
bonneae, 63 microannulata (nigripalpus), 6
brevispinosus, 63 microsquamosus (nigripalpus), 31
camposi (coronator), 21 mollis, 69
caraibeus (nigripalpus), 4 elocutilis, 51
carmodyae (nigripalpus), 18 equivocator, 51
chidesteri, 51 lateropunctata, 6
corniger lepostenis, 52
basilicus, 69 mooseri (coronator), 37
hassardii, 31 mortificator (nigripalpus), 12
lactator, 37 nigripalpus, 61
loquaculus, 51 biocellatus, 69
rigidus, 23 caraibeus, 4
subfuscus, 31 carmodyae, 18
coronator, 69 factor, 37
albertoi, 74 microannulata, 6
camposi, 21 microsquamosus, 31
mooseri, 37 mortificator, 12
ousqua, 51 palus, 4, 61
usquatissimus, 51 prasinopleurus, 15
usquatus, 63 proximus, 52
cubensis (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 15 regulator, 18
declarator, 69 Similis, 31
dictator, 17 ousqua (coronator), 51
inquisitor, 69 palus (nigripalpus), 4, 61
jubilator, 51 penafieli (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 38
proclamator, 37 petersoni (bahamensis), 77
revelator, 51 peus
vindicator, 17 eumimetes, 37
delys, 51 pinarocampa, 38
dictator (declarator), 17 pipiens pallens
dipseticus (pipiens pallens), 38 dipseticus, 38
duplicator, 18 p. quinquefasciatus
*eleuthera (bahamensis), 3 aikenii, 63
elocutilis (mollis), 51 aseyehae, 3
equivocator (mollis), 51 barbarus, 69
eremita (habilitator), 18 cubensis, 15
erythrothorax #lachrimans (for aikenii), 63
federalis, 37 penafieli, 38
eumimetes (peus), 37 revocator, 32
extricator (inflictus), 69 prasinopleurus (nigripalpus), 15
factor (nigripalpus), 37 proclamator (declarator), 37
federalis (erythrothorax), 37 proximus (nigripalpus), 52
finlayi, 15 : pseudojanthinosoma, 24
guayasi, 21 quasisecutor (secutor), 32
*habilitator, 18 quitensis, 21
eremita, 18 reflector (interrogator), 51
hassardii (corniger), 31 regulator (nigripalpus), 18
inflictus, 26 revelator (declarator), 51
extricator, 69 revocator (pipiens quinquefasciatus), 32
scholasticus, 26, 60, 61 rigidus (corniger), 23
inquisitor (declarator), 69 scholasticus (inflictus), 26, 60, 61.
interrogator, 37 scimitar, 4
reflector, 51 scutatus, 9
janitor, 31 secutor, 32
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
lamentator, 18
quasisecutor, 32
toweri, 60
similis (nigripalpus), 31
sphinx, 4
stenolepis, 38
subfuscus (corniger), 31
surinamensis, 63
tisseuli, 24
toweri (secutor), 60
. usquatissimus (coronator), 51
usquatus (coronator), 63
vindicator (declarator), 17
CULEX (EUBONNEA) [2]
amazonensis
paraplesia, 10
*tapena, 65
CULEX (LUTZIA) [2]
allostigma, 50
*bigoti, 37
CULEX (MELANOCONION) [136]
advieri (atratus), 27
aikenii, 6
*inornatus, 6
ocossa, 6
panocossa, 52
albinensis, 63
maroniensis, 63
alcocci, 63
alfaroi (bastagarius), 12
amitis, 74
aneles (educator), 53
annulipes (taeniopus), 32
apeteticus (educator), 52
*atratus, 32, 70
advieri, 27
falsificator, 15
aurilatus (chrysonotum), 24
bastagarius, 70
alfaroi, 12
euclyx, 52
innominatus, 75
vapulans, 64
xivylis, 64
batesi, 9
bibulus (educator), 64
bilobatus (sardinerae), 54
bonneti (elevator), 27
borinqueni (erraticus), 60
carcinophilus, 18
caribeanus, 52
cavernicolus (putumayensis), 24
cayennensis (vomerifer), 25
changuinolae, 52
chrysonotum, 52
aurilatus, 24
comatus, 24
commevynensis, 64
comminutor, 64
confundior, 64
conspirator, 38
dysmathes, 52
fatuator, 52
holoneus, 13
inducens, 75
macaronensis, 75
merodaemon, 13
meroneus, 9
pasadaemon, 13
coppenamensis, 64
corentynensis, 64
creole, 75
crybda, 9
cuclyx (bastagarius), 52
curryi (elevator), 53
decorator, 67
distinguendus, 52
dornarum (elevator), 53
dunni, 52
ruffinis, 52
dysmathes (conspirator), 52
eastor, 64
educator, 13
aneles, 53
apeteticus, 52
bibulus, 64
vaxus, 64
egcymon, 53
elephas, 53
elevator, 13
bonneti, 27
eurryi, os
dornarum, 53
vogelsangi, 75
ensiformis (zeteki), 65
epanastasis (taeniopus), 54
*epirus, 6
equinoxialis, 24
ernsti, 75
erraticus
borinqueni, 60
invocator, 15
leprincei, 53
moorei, 6
tovari,. 0
trachycampa, 53
fairchildi, 53
falsificator (atratus), 15
fatuator (conspirator), 52
flabellifer, 53
fur (spissipes), 54
galindoi, 53
eravitator, 38
*haynei (menytes), 54
holoneus (conspirator), 13
idottus, 64
terepaima, 75
implicatus, 24
inducens (conspirator), 75
inhibitator, 18
investigator, 38
innominatus (bastagarius), 75
*inornatus (aikenii), 6
intonsus, 29
investigator (inhibitator), 38
invocator (erraticus), 15
85
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
iolambdis, 53
jocasta, 26
johnsoni, 53
jonistes (ybarmis), 65
jubifer, 53
keenani, 54
kummi, 54
leprincei (erraticus), 53
ligator (sursumptor), 10
limacifer, 13
loturus (zeteki), 75
lucifugus, 75
macaronensis (conspirator), 75
madininensis, 33
maroniensis (albinensis), 63
maxinocca, 64
tosimus, 64
*menytes, 54
*haynei, 54
merodaemon (conspirator), 13
meroneus (conspirator), 9
mesodenticulatus, 54
mistura, 9 _
moorei (erraticus), 6
mutator, 38
mychonde (opisthopus), 54
nicceriensis, 64 .
nigrimacula
punctiscapularis, 24
ocossa (aikenii), 6
opisthopus, 29
mychonde, 54
panocossa (aikenii), 52
paracrybda, 54
pasadaemon (conspirator), 13
patientiae, 24
phlabistus, 64
phlogistus, 64
vidali, 24
pifanoi, 75
portesi (vomerifer), 25
productus, 24
psatharus, 54
pseudotaeniopus, 54
punctiscapularis (nigrimacula), 24
putumayensis
cavernicolus, 24
quadrifoliatus, 54
quasihybridus, 54
rabanicolus, 24
rorotaensis, 24
ruffinis (dunni), 52
Saramaccensis, 65
sardinerae, 60
bilobatus, 54
Simulator, 70
Spissipes, 70
fur, 54
sursumptor, 9
ligator, 10
taeniopus, 42
annulipes, 32
-epanastasis, 54
tecmarsis, 55
terebor, 65
terepaima (idottus), 75
tosimus (maxinocca), 64
tournieri, 24
tovari (erraticus), 75
trachycampa (erraticus), 53
*trifidus, 13
trisetosus, 25
vapulans (bastagarius), 64
vaxus (educator), 64
venezuelensis, 75
vidali (phlogistus), 24
vogelsangi (elevator), 75
vomerifer, 55
portesi, 25
cayennensis, 25
wepsterae, 65
xivylis (bastagarius), 64
ybarmis, 65
jonistes, 65
zeteki, 55
ensiformis, 65
loturus, 75
CULEX (MICROCULEX) [17]
azymus, 70
chryselatus, 65
-consolator, 70
consternator (restrictor), 38
daumastocampa, 55
daumasturus (imitator), 70
elongatus, 10
erethyzonfer, 55
gaudeator, 55
imitator
daumasturus, 70
vector, 70
inimitabilis, 70
jenningsi, 55
kukenan, 75
reginae, 25
rejector, 38
restrictor, 38
consternator, 38
stonei, 70
vector (imitator), 70
CULEX (MOCHLOSTYRAX) [18]
#agitator (pilosus), 15
alogistus, 65
arboricolus, 55
*caudelli, 70
multispinosus, 65
colombiensis (pilosus), 10
cubensis (pilosus), 15
curopinensis (pilosus), 65
foliafer, 65
hesitator (pilosus), 55
ignobilis (pilosus), 16
jamaicensis (pilosus), 32
lacertosus, 55
mastigia (pilosus), 16
multispinosus (caudelli), 65
pilosus, 38
#agitator (for cubensis), 15
colombiensis, 10
cubensis, 15
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
curopinensis, 65
hesitator, 55
ignobilis, 16
jamaicensis, 32
mastigia, 16
radiatus, 25
#reductor (for jamaicensis), 32
radiatus (pilosus), 25
#reductor (pilosus), 32
rooti, 55
unicornis, 75
vexillifer, 55
CULEX (NEOCULEX) [1]
derivator, 37
CULEX (subgenus unknown) [2]
maculatus, 21
romeroi, 76
culicivora, Trichoprosopon (R.), 45
CULISETA (CULISETA) [1]
particeps
dugesi, 37
cuneatus, Aedes (O.), 36
curopinensis, Culex (Mochl.), 65
curryi, Culex (Mel.), 53
cyaneus, Sabethes (S.), 41
cyanopennis, Psorophora (P.), 8
daumastocampa, Culex (Micr.), 55
daumasturus, Culex (Micr.), 70
declarator, Culex (C.), 69
decorator, Culex (Mel.), 67
DEINOCERITES [12]
*cancer, 32
tetraspathus, 42
dyari, 56
*epitedeus, 13
howardi, 38
mcdonaldi, 39
*magnus, 61
troglodytus, 71
melanophylum, 56
monospathus, 56:
monospathus (melanophylum), 56
pseudes, 56
*spanius, 56
tetraspathus (cancer), 42
troglodytus (magnus), 71
delta, Anopheles (N.), 72
delys, Culex (C.), 51
derivator, Culex (N.), 37
dicellaphora, Trichoprosopon (C.), 45
dictator, Culex (C.), 17
dipseticus, Culex (C.), 38
distinguendus, Culex (Mel.), 52
divisior, Culex (A.), 70
DIXELLA [7]
atra, 57
clavulus, 61
hoffmani, 60
*lirio, 57
shannoni, 13
trinitensis, 71
venezuelensis, 76
*dominicii, Aedes (Sop.), 74
dornarum, Culex (Mel.), 53
downsi, Corethrella, 71
draconarius, Aedes (F.), 23
*drapetes, Wyeomyia (W.), 67
dugesi, Culiseta (C.), 37
dunni, Culex (Mel.), 52.
duplicator, Culex (C.), 18
dyari, Corethrella, 56
dyari, Deinocerites, 56
dymodora, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
dysmathes, Culex (Mel.), 52
eastor, Culex (Mel.), 64
echinata, Psorophora (J.), 30
educator, Culex (Mel.), 13
EDWARDSOPS [1]
stonei, 76
egcymon, Culex (Mel.), 53
eiseni, Anopheles (A.), 27
elephas, Culex (Mel.), 53
*eleuthera, Culex (C.), 3
elevator, Culex (Mel.), 13
elocutilis, Culex (C.), 51
eloisa, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
elongatus, Culex (Micr.), 10
ensiformis, Culex (Mel.), 65
epactius, Aedes (F.), 36
epanastasis, Culex (Mel.), 54
*epirus, Culex (Mel.), 6
*epitedeus, Deinocerites, 13
equinoxialis, Culex (Mel.), 24
equinus, Haemagogus (L.), 31
equivocator, Culex (C.), 51
eremita, Culex (C.), 18
erethyzonfer, Culex (Micr.), 55
ernsti, Culex (Mel.), 75
esmeraldasi, Phoniomyia, 20
espartana, Wyeomyia (W.), 11
espini, Trichoprosopon (I.), 44
eucephalaeus, Aedes (O.), 63
euethes, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
euiris, Aedes (O.), 8
eumimetes, Culex (C.), 37
euplocamus, Aedes (O.), 12
evansae, Trichoprosopon (R.), 8
extricator, Culex (C.), 69
factor, Culex (C.); 37
fairchildi, Culex (Mel.), 53
falco, Haemagogus (S.), 9
fallax, Wyeomyia (W.), 62
falsificator, Culex (Mel.), 15
fasciatus, Aedes (S.), 41, 77
fascipes, Orthopodomyia, 11
fatuator, Culex (Mel.), 52
fauna, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
fausti, Anopheles (A.), 34
favor, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
federalis, Culex (C.), 37
felicia, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
ferox, Psorophora (J.), 20
festivus, Sayomyia, 57
finlayi, Culex (C,), 15
flabellifer, Culex (Mel.), 53
flaveola, Mansonia (M.), 77
87
88 Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
flavifacies, Wyeomyia (A.), 5
*florestan, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
flui, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
foliafer, Culex (Mochl.), 65
frater, Aedes (S.), 33, 41
fratercula, Wyeomyia (W.), 33
*frontosum, Trichoprosopon (R.), 4
funiculus, Psorophora (G.), 8
fur, Culex (Mel.), 54
gabaldoni, Anopheles (A.), 34
galindoi, Culex (Mel.), 53
*valoa, Wyeomyia (D.), 28
garciai, Haemagogus (H.), 21
*varciai, Psorophora (G.), 20
gaudeator, Culex (Micr.), 55
gaudians, Wyeomyia (W.), 73
gausapata, Wyeomyia (W.), 73
gladiator, Haemagogus (H.), 50
glaucocephala, Wyeomyia (W.), 17
goeldii, Sabethes (S.), 68
gomezdelatorrei, Anopheles (L.), 19
gorgasi, Anopheles (N.), 43
gorgasi, Haemagogus (S.), 37
*orabhamii, Anopheles (A.), 30
grandiosus, Toxorhynchites (L.), 34
gravitator, Culex (Mel.), 38
*orayii, Wyeomyia (W.), 26, 60
grenadensis, Wyeomyia (D.), 26
guadeloupensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 27
guarao, Anopheles (A.), 72
guarauno, Anopheles (N.), 72
guatemala, Wyeomyia (W.), 28
guatemalensis, Anopheles (A.), 28
guayasi, Culex (C.), 21
guayasi, Limatus, 20
guianensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 62
gynaecopus, Wyeomyia (W.), 11
habanicus, Aedes (O.), 15
*habilitator, Culex (C.), 18
HAEMAGOGUS (HAEMAGOGUS) [10]
argyromeris, 50
gladiator, 50
boshelli, 9
celeste (splendens), 74
chalcospilans, 50
gearciai, 21
gladiator (argyromeris), 50
iridicolor, 12
lucifer, 50
regalis, 22
*splendens, 61
celeste, 74
HAEMAGOGUS (LONGIPALPIFER) [5]
affirmatus (equinus), 36
equinus, 31
affirmatus, 36
philosophicus, 37
*panarchys, 20
philosophicus (equinus), 37
soperi, 20
HAEMAGOGUS (STEGOCONOPS) [8]
*albomaculatus, 6
alticola (mesodentatus), 37
anastasionis, 12
andinus, 9
capricornii
falco [also spegazzinii], 9
janthinomys [also spegazzinii], 69
falco (capricornii and spegazzinii), 9
gorgasi (mesodentatus), 37
janthinomys (capricornii and spegazzinii), 6
mesodentatus, 12
altieola, 37
gorgasi, 37
spegazzinii
falco [also capricornii], 9
janthinomys [also capricornii], 69
-*haemorrhoidalis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 23
haitiensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 17
hapla, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
haruspicus, Psorophora (G.), 30
hassardii, Culex (C.), 31
hastatus, Aedes (O.), 50
*haynei, Culex (Mel.), 54
hectoris, Anopheles (A.), 28
hemisagnosta, Wyeomyia (W.), 22
hemisiris, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
hemisurus, Aedes (O.), 30
hesitator, Culex (Mochl.), 55
heteropus, Aedes (F.), 12
hirsuta, Wyeomyia (W.), 30
hoffmani, Dixella, 60
hoffmani, Limatus, 29
holoneus, Culex (Mel.), 13
homoeopus, Aedes (F.), 12
homothe, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
homotina, Trichoprosopon (C.), 11
homunculus, Anopheles (K.), 8
hortator, Aedes (O.), 68
hosautos, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
howardi, Deinocerites, 38
humeralis, Mansonia (M.), 5
hylephilus, Anopheles (K.), 44
hypoptes, Toxorhynchites (L.), 42
hystera, Uranotaenia, 74
identicus, Sabethes (Sabethinus), 49
idottus, Culex (Mel.), 64
ignobilis, Culex (Mochl.), 16
imperfectus, Sabethes (Sabethoides), 63
implicatus, Culex (Mel.), 24
inaequalis, Aedes (H.), 31
incana, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
incognita, Uranotaenia, 49
indoctum, Psorophora (G.), 68
indolescens, Aedes (O.), 15
inducens, Culex (Mel.), 75
infine, Psorophora (G.), 17
inflictus, Culex (C.), 26
infoliatus, Culex (Carrol.), 65
inhibitator, Culex (Mel.), 18
inimitabilis, Culex (Micr.), 70
ininii, Anopheles (N.), 23
innominatus, Culex (Mel.), 75
*inornatus, Culex (Mel.), 6
inquisitor, Culex (C.), 69
insolita, Aedes (F.), 69
insularia, Psorophora (G.), 18
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
interrogator, Culex (C.), 37
intonca, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
intonsus, Culex (Mel.), 29
investigator, Culex (Mel.), 38
invocator, Culex (Mel.), 15
iolambdis, Culex (Mel.), 53
ioliota, Aedes (H.), 69
iracunda, Psorophora (P.), 12
iridicolor, Haemagogus (H.), 12
iris, Toxorhynchites (L.), 67
izquierdoi, Corethrella, 39
jamaicensis, Culex (Mochl.), 32
*jamaicensis, Psorophora (G.), 30
jamaicensis, Psorophora (J.), 30
janitor, Culex (Ci), 34
janthinomys, Haemagogus (S.), 69
jenningsi, Corethrella, 56
jenningsi, Culex (Micr.), 55
jocasta, Culex (Mel.), 26
*jocosa, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
johnsoni, Culex (Mel.), 53
johnstonii, Psorophora (J.), 30
jonistes, Culex (Mel.), 65
jubifer, Culex (Mel.), 53
jubilator, Culex (C.), 51
kappleri, Sabethes (S.), 62
keenani, Culex (Mel.), 54
knabi, Aedes (F.), 36
kompi, Aedes (F.), 36
kompi, Anopheles (S.), 43
kukenan, Culex (Micr.), 75
kummi, Culex (Mel.), 54
kummi, Orthopodomyia, 12
labesba, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
lacertosus, Culex (Mochl.), 55
#lachrimans, Culex (C.), 63
lactator, Culex (C.)..67
lamellata, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
lamentator, Culex (C.), 18
lampropus, Trichoprosopon (R.), 45
laneana, Corethrella, 39
lanei, Trichoprosopon (R.), 8
lassalli, Phoniomyia, 68
laternaria, Aedes (F.), 69
lateropunctata, Culex (C.), 6
laticlasper, Culex (C.), 51
*latisquama, Culex (A.), 13
lepostenis, Culex (C.), 52
leprincei, Culex (Mel.), 53
leucopisthepus, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
leucoptera, Uranotaenia, 5
leucopus, Trichoprosopon (R.), 42
leucotaeniatus, Aedes (F.), 50
levicastilloi, Anopheles (A.), 19
levicastilloi, Culex (C.), 21
ligator, Culex (Mel.), 10
limacifer, Culex (Mel.), 13
LIMATUS [8]
andinus, 20
asulleptus, 5
*methysticus, 11
cacophrades (durhamii), 49
durhamii
cacophrades, 49
guayasi, 20
hoffmani, 29
martiali, 23
*methysticus (asulleptus), 11
pseudomethysticus, 62
lineata, Psorophora (P.), 8
*lirio, Dixella, 57
lithoecetor, Aedes (F.), 50
lloydi, Anopheles (N.), 44
longipes, Toxorhynchites (L.), 34
longipes, Trichoprosopon (R.), 41
loquaculus, Culex (C.), 51
loturus, Culex (Mel.), 75
lowii, Uranotaenia, 60
luciae, Wyeomyia (D.), 23
luciensis, Aedes (S.), 6, 60
lucifer, Haemagogus (H.), 50
lucifugus, Culex (Mel.), 75
LUTZOMIOPS [1]
pallida, 56
mcdonaldi, Deinocerites, 39
macaronensis, Culex (Mel.), 75
macrotus, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
maculatus, Culex, 21
madininensis, Culex (Mel.), 33
*magnus, Deinocerites, 61
malefactor, Anopheles (A.), 43
manaensis, Culex (Carrol.), 25
MANSONIA (MANSONIA) [2]
flaveola, 77
humeralis, 5
MANSONIA (RHYNCHOTAENIA) [4]
arribalzagai
coticula, 49
coticula (arribalzagai), 49
nigricans, 49
persephassa, 15
persephassa (nigricans), 15
venezuelensis, 73
mara, Toxorhynchites (L.), 72
maracayensis, Culex (C.), 74
maroniensis, Culex (Mel.), 63
martiali, Limatus, 23
martineti, Aedes (O.), 23
#martinii, Uranotaenia, 7
mastigia, Culex (Mochl.), 16
mataea, Wyeomyia (W.), 22
mathesoni, Culex (Carrol.), 76
mathisi, Aedes (O.), 25
maxinocca, Culex (Mel.), 64
*mediovittatus, Aedes (F.), 18
megalodora, Wyeomyia (W.), 22
melanica, Corethrella, 71
melanocephala, Wyeomyia (D.), 68
melanophylum, Deinocerites, 56
melanopus, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
*menytes, Culex (Mel.), 54
meridionalis, Aedes (O.), 12
merodaemon, Culex (Mel.), 13
meroneus, Culex (Mel.), 9
mesodentatus, Haemagogus (S.), 12
89
90 Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
mesodenticulatus, Culex (Mel.), 54
metempsytus, Culex (Carrol.), 13
*methysticus, Limatus, 11
metoecopus, Aedes (F.), 20
mexicana, Psorophora (@J.), 35
microannulata, Culex (C.), 6
microsquamosus, Culex (C.), 31
milleri, Aedes (O.), 8
minor, Wyeomyia (W.), 14
minuta, Uranotaenia, 5
mistura, Culex (Mel.), 9
mitchellii, Wyeomyia (W.), 30
moctezuma Toxorhynchites (L.), 11
modalma, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
modesta, Uranotaenia, 7
moengoensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 62
moerbista, Wyeomyia (D.), 5
mogilasium, Trichoprosopon (T.), 44
mollis, Culex (C.), 69
monospathus, Deinocerites, 56
moorei, Culex (Mel.), 6
mooseri, Culex (C.), 37
moralesi, Trichoprosopon (S.), 28
mortificator, Culex (C.), 12
mosquito, Aedes (S.), 15
muelleri, Aedes (O.), 36
multispinosus, Culex (Mochl.), 65
mutator, Culex (Mel.), 38
mychonde, Culex (Mel.), 54
neivai, Anopheles (K.), 44
neomaculipalpus, Anopheles (A.), 43
nicceriensis, Culex (Mel.), 64
niger, Aedes (O.), 3
nigricans, Mansonia (R.), 49
nigripalpus, Culex (C.), 61
nigritubus, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
*nimbus, Anopheles (S.), 4
niveopalpis, Anopheles (A.), 43
*nivipes, Trichoprosopon (T.), 67
nubilis, Aedes (O.), 5
nuneztovari, Anopheles (N.), 72
obturbator, Aedes (O.), 3
*occulta, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
ochrura, Wyeomyia (W.), 17
ocossa, Culex (Mel.), 6
ocumarensis, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
oiketorakras, Anopheles (L.), 8
oligopistus, Aedes (O.), 68
*onidus, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
opisthopus, Culex (Mel.), 29
orthodoxa, Uranotaenia, 11
ORTHOPODOMYIA [4]
fascipes, 11
kummi, 12
phyllozoa, 50
Signifera
waverleyi, 30
ortizi, Sabethes (S.), 35
oteizai, Uranotaenia, 15
ousqua, Culex (C.), 51
paganus, Culex (A.), 75
palliatus, Aedes (H.), 69
pallida, Lutzomiops, 56
paludosa, Uranotaenia, 49
palus, Culex (C.), 4, 61
pampithes, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
panamena, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
*panarchys, Haemagogus (L.), 20
*pandora, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
panocossa, Culex (Mel.), 52
pantoia, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
paracrybda, Culex (Mel.), 54
paraitepuyensis, Sabethes (S.), 73
paraplesia, Culex (E.), 10
parapunctipennis, Anopheles (A.), 34
pasadaemon, Culex (Mel.), 13
patientiae, Culex (Mel.), 24
pazosi, Psorophora (J.), 15
penafieli, Culex (C.), 38
perichares, Aedes (F.), 12
persephassa, Mansonia (R.), 15
pertinans, Wyeomyia (W.), 61
pertinax, Aedes (O.), 30
*perturbans, Trichoprosopon (I.), 61
petersoni, Culex (C.), 77
philophone, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
philosophicus, Haemagogus (L.), 37
phlabistus, Culex (Mel.), 64
phlogistus, Culex (Mel.), 64
PHONIOMYIA [4]
esmeraldasi, 20
lassalli, 68
splendida, 62
trinidadensis, 68
phroso, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
phyllozoa, Orthopodomyia, 50
pifanoi, Culex (Mel.), 75
pilosus, Culex (Mochl.), 38
pinarocampa, Culex (C.), 38
pisces, Psorophora (J.), 35
pix, Aedes (O.), 7
plutocraticus, Aedes (O.), 3
podographicus, Aedes (F.), 22
polyagrus, Aedes (O.), 50
portesi, Culex (Mel.), 25
portoricensis, Aedes (O.), 60
portoricensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 59
posticatus, Psorophora (J.), 35
-prasinopleurus, Culex (C.), 15
proclamator, Culex (C.), 37
productus, Culex (Mel.), 24
prolepidis, Wyeomyia (D.), 47
*proviolans, Wyeomyia (D.), 48
proximus, Culex (C.), 52
pruinosa, Psorophora (G.), 36
-psatharus, Culex (Mel.), 54
pseudes, Deinocerites, 56
pseudodominicii, Aedes (Sop.), 9
pseudojanthinosoma, Culex (C.), 24
pseudomethysticus, Limatus, 62
pseudopecten, Wyeomyia (D.), 68
pseudopunctipennis, Anopheles (A.), 26
pseudotaeniopus, Culex (Mel.), 54
PSOROPHORA (GRABHAMIA) [15]
antiguae (pygmaea), 3
cingulata, 41
*oarciai, 20
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
indoctum, 68
infine, 17
confinnis
funiculus, 8
*jamaicensis, 30
toltecum, 35
trigonophorus, 74
walsinghamii, 30
funiculus (confinnis), 8
*oarciai (cingulata), 20
haruspicus (insularia), 30
indoctum (cingulata), 68
infine (cingulata), 17
insularia, 18
haruspicus, 30
*jamaicensis (confinnis), 30
pruinosa, 36
pygmaea, 3
antiguae, 3
Signipennis, 36
toltecum (confinnis), 35
trigonophorus (confinnis), 74
walsinghamii (confinnis), 30
PSOROPHORA (JANTHINOSOMA) [17]
albipes, 68
champerico, 28
pisces, 35
coffini (johnstonii), 3
cyanescens
tovari, 74
echinata (ferox), 30
ferox, 20
echinata, 30
jamaicensis, 30
pazosi, 15
posticatus, 35
terminalis, 60
vanhalli, 63
jamaicensis (ferox), 30
johnstonii, 30
coffini, 3
schwarzi, 15
mexicana, 35
pazosi (ferox), 15
pisces (champerico), 35
posticatus (ferox), 35
schwarzi (johnstonii), 15
terminalis (ferox), 60
totonaci, 35
tovari (cyanescens), 74
vanhalli (ferox), 63
varipes, 35
PSOROPHORA (PSOROPHORA) [9]
blanchardi (lineata), 74
ciliata
cyanopennis, 8
cilipes, 41
iracunda, 12
cyanopennis (ciliata), 8
howardii
Simplex, 35
virescens, 35
iracunda (cilipes), 12
lineata, 8
blanchardi, 74
saeva, 68
saeva (lineata), 68
simplex (howardii), 35
stonei, 35
virescens (howardii), 35
punctimacula, Anopheles (A.), 43
punctiscapularis, Culex (Mel.), 24
*purpureipes, Aedes (O.), 36
pusillum, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
pygmaea, Psorophora (G.), 3
quadrifoliatus, Culex (Mel.), 54
quadrivittatus, Aedes (H.), 28
quasihibridus, Culex (Mel.), 54
quasiluteoventralis, Wyeomyia (W.), 5
quasisecutor, Culex (C.), 32
quasiserratus, Aedes (O.), 31
quitensis, Culex (C.), 21
rabanicolus, Culex (Mel.), 24
radiatus, Culex (Mochl.), 25
ramirezi, Aedes (F.), 36
rangeli, Anopheles (N.), 72
rangeli, Sabethes (Sabethoides), 73
rapax, Trichoprosopon (R.), 67
#reductor, Culex (Mochl.), 32
reflector, Culex (C.), 51
regalis, Haemagogus (H.), 22
reginae, Culex (Micr.), 25
regulator, Culex (C.), 18
rejector, Culex (Micr.), 38
restrictor, Culex (Micr.), 38
revelator, Culex (C.), 51
revocator, Culex (C.), 32
rigidus, Culex (C.), 23
rivadeneirai, Anopheles (A.), 19
robusta, Wyeomyia (W.), 23
rolonca, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
roloncetta, Wyeomyia (W.), 47
romeroi, Culex, 76
rooti, Culex (Mochl.), 55
rorotaensis, Culex (Mel.), 24
rorotai, Wyeomyia (D.), 23
roucouyana, Wyeomyia (D.), 62
*rowlandii, Uranotaenia, 5
rozeboomi, Aedes (O.), 36
ruffinis, Culex (Mel.), 52
SABETHES (SABETHES) [9]
amazonicus
kappleri, 62
belisarioi
goeldii, 68
schausi, 5
bipartipes, 17
chroiopus, 5
chroiopus (bipartipes), 5
cyaneus, 41
goeldii (belisarioi), 68
kappleri (amazonicus), 62
ortizi, 35
paraitepuyensis, 73
schausi (belisarioi), 5
tarsopus, 49
91
92 Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
SABETHES (SABETHINUS) [2] *symmachus, Wyeomyia (W.), 45
identicus, 49 tachirensis, Aedes (H.), 74
undosus, 68 taeniopus, Culex (Mel.), 42
*taeniorhynchus, Aedes (O.), 36
*tapena, Culex (E.), 65
#tarsimaculatus, Anopheles (N.), 2, 4, 30
tarsopus, Sabethes (S.), 49
SABETHES (SABETHOIDES) [3]
chloropterus, 20
imperfectus, 63
ot taurepana, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
saeva, Psorophora (P.), 68 tecmarsis, Culex (Mel.), 55
sanctielii, Anopheles (N.), 23 telestica, Wyeomyia (W.), 68
saramaccensis, Culex (Mel.), 65 telmatophila, Uranotaenia, 49
sardinerae, Culex (Mel.), 60 terebor, Culex (Mel.), 65
terepaima, Culex (Mel.), 75
terminalis, Psorophora (J.), 60
testei, Wyeomyia (D.), 23 |
tetraspathus, Deinocerites, 42
thaxteri, Aedes (H.), 26
SAYOMYIA [2]
antillum, 16
brasiliensis
festivus, 57
schausi, Sabethes (S.), 5 thorntoni, Aedes (F.), 42
schedocyclium, Trichoprosopon (S.), 42 tisseuili, Culex (C.), 24
scholasticus, Culex (C.), 26, 60, 61. toltecum, Psorophora (G.), 35
schwarzi, Psorophora (J.), 15 tortilis, Aedes (O.), 31
scimitar, Culex (C.), 4 tosimus, Culex (Mel.), 64
scotinomus, Wyeomyia (W.), 46 totonaci, Psorophora (J.), 35
scutatus, Culex (C.), 9 tournieri, Culex (Mel.), 24
scutellalbum, Aedes (F.), 9 tovari, Culex (Mel.), 75
secundus, Culex (Carrol.), 56 tovari, Psorophora (J.), 74
secutor, Culex (C.), 32 toweri, Culex (C.), 60
septemstriatus, Aedes (H.), 42
serratoria, Wyeomyia (D.), 73
*serratus, Aedes (O.), 5, 68
sexlineatus, Aedes (H.), 69
shannoni, Aedes (O.), 36
shannoni, Dixella, 13
shropshirei, Trichoprosopon (I.), 44
signipennis, Psorophora (G.), 36
similans, Corethrella, 71
similis, Culex (C.), 31
simmsi, Wyeomyia (W.), 46
simplex, Psorophora (P.), 35
simulator, Culex (Mel.), 70
socialis, Uranotaenia, 30
soperi, Haemagogus (L.), 20
sororcula, Wyeomyia (W.), 17
*spanius, Deinocerites, 56
sphinx, Culex (C.), 4
spissipes, Culex (Mel.), 70
*splendens, Haemagogus (H.), 61
splendida, Phoniomyia, 62
*squamifemur, Anopheles (L.), 8
stenei, Aedes (H.), 31
stenolepis, Culex (C.), 38 apa 7D
One, Anopheles (A.), 34 superbus (haemorrhoidalis), 67
stonei, Corethrella, 56 Heonaidi
stonei, Culex (Micr.), 70 ——
stonei, Edwardsops, 76
stonei, Psorophora (P.), 35
stonei, Wyeomyia (W.), 35
TOXORHYNCHITES (LYNCHIELLA) [15]
aldrichanus (bambusicolus), 62
bambusicolus
aldrichanus, 62
grandiosus, 34
longipes, 34
guadeloupensis, 27
guianensis, 62
guianensis (guadeloupensis), 62
*haemorrhoidalis, 23
Superbus, 67
haitiensis (portoricensis), 17
hypoptes (theobaldi), 42
iris (mariae), 67
longipes (grandiosus), 34
mara (solstitialis), 72
mariae
iris, 67
moctezuma (theobaldi), 11
moengoensis (theobaldi), 62
portoricensis, 59
haitiensis, 17
solstitialis
hypoptes, 42
moctezuma, 11
moengoensis, 62
trinidadensis, 67
oe. trinidadensis (theobaldi), 67
superbus, Toxorhynchites (L.), 67 tracei, Aedes (H. and Sop.), 33
surinamensis, Culex (C.), 63 trachycampa, Culex (Mel.), 53
surinamensis, Wyeomyia (D.), 62 trapidoi, Uranotaenia, 49
sursumptor, Culex (Mel.), 9 traversus, Aedes (O.), 74
surukumensis, Culex (A.), 75
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
TRICHOPROSOPON (CTENOGOELDIA) [2]
magnum
dicellaphora, 45
homotina, 11
»TRICHOPROSOPON (ISOSTOMYIA) [3]
espini, 44
Shropshirei, 44
*perturbans, 61
TRICHOPROSOPON (RUNCHOMYIA) [10]
cotopaxensis, 19
culicivora (longipes), 45
evansae, 8
*frontosum, 4
rapax, 67
lampropus, 45
lanei, 8
leucopus, 42
longipes, 41
culicivora, 45
ulopus, 42
rapax (frontosum), 67
ulopus (longipes), 42
TRICHOPROSOPON (SHANNONIANA) [2]
moralesi, 28
schedocyclium, 42
TRICHOPROSOPON (TRICHOPROSOPON) [5]
andinum, 19
compressum
mogilasium, 44
trichorryes, 44
digitatum
*nivipes, 67
wilsoni, 44
mogilasium (compressum), 44
*nivipes (digitatum), 67
trichorryes (compressum), 44
wilsoni (digitatum), 44
TRICHOPROSOPON (VONPLESSENIA) [1]
*vyonplesseni, 19
trichorryes, Trichoprosopon (T.), 44
*trifidus, Culex (Mel.), 13
trigonophorus, Psorophora (G.), 74
trinidadensis, Phoniomyia, 68
trinidadensis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 67
trinitensis, Dixella, 71
tripunctata, Corethrella, 60
trisetosus, Culex (Mel.), 25
trisignatus, Anopheles (N.), 34
troglodytus, Deinocerites, 71
typhlosomata, Uranotaenia, 50
ulocoma, Wyeomyia (D.), 5
ulopus, Trichoprosopon (R.), 42
uncatus, Aedes (F.), 31
undosus, Sabethes (Sabethinus), 68
unicornis, Culex (Mochl.), 75
upatensis, Aedes (F.), 74
URANOTAENIA [22]
aequatorianna, 20
apicalis, 3
basilis (coatzacoalcos), 35
bicolor (hystera), 7
briseis, 74
calosomata, 49
coatzacoalcos, 35
basalis, 35
cooki, 29
hystera, 74
bicolor, 7
#martinii (for bicolor), 7
incognita, 49
leucoptera, 5
lowii, 60
minuta, 5
#martinii (hystera), 7
minuta (lowii), 5
modesta (pulcherrima), 7
nataliae
*rowlandii, 5
orthodoxa, 11
oteizai, 15
paludosa, 49
pulcherrima
modesta, 7
*rowlandii (nataliae), 5
socialis, 30
telmatophila, 49
trapidoi, 49
typhlosomata, 50
urichii, Culex (Carrol.), 70
usquatissimus, Culex (C.), 51
usquatus, Culex (C.), 63
vanhalli, Psorophora @J.), 63
vapulans, Culex (Mel.), 64
vargasi, Anopheles (L.), 72
varipes, Psorophora (J.), 35
vaxus, Culex (Mel.), 64
vector, Culex (Micr.), 70
venezuelae, Anopheles (A.), 72
venezuelensis, Culex (Mel.), 75
venezuelensis, Dixella, 76
venezuelensis, Mansonia (R.), 73
vestitipennis, Anopheles (A.), 28
vexillifer, Culex (Mochl.), 55
vidali, Culex (Mel.), 24
vindicator, Culex (C.), 17
violescens, Wyeomyia (W.), 14
virescens, Psorophora (P.), 35
virginensis, Aedes (O.), 77
vogelsangi, Culex (Mel.), 75
vomerifer, Culex (Mel.), 55
*vonplesseni, Trichoprosopon (V.), 19
*walkeri, Aedes (H.), 31
walsinghamii, Psorophora (G.), 30
waverleyi, Orthopodomyia, 30
wepsterae, Culex (Mel.), 65
whartoni, Corethrella, 39
whitmorei, Aedes (Sop.), 9
willardi, Anopheles (A.), 34
wilsoni, Trichoprosopon (T.), 44
WYEOMYIA (ANTUNESMYIA) [2]
colombiana, 8
flavifacies, 5
WYEOMYIA (DAVISMYIA) [1]
arborea, 47
93
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
WYEOMYIA (DENDROMYIA) [53]
agnostips (melanocephala), 48
agyrtes (clasoleuca), 47
albocaerulea (argenteorostris), 23
*albosquamata, 62
andropus (circumcincta), 47
*aporonoma, 22
argenteorostris, 62
albocaefulea, 23
autocratica, 68
bicompressa (pseudopecten), 73
cacodela (ulocoma), 48
canfieldi (melanocephala), 47
cara (pseudopecten), 68
chalcocephala, 28
luciae, 23
*circumcincta, 47
andropus, 47
intonca, 47
macrotus, 47
*clasoleuca, 47
agyrtes, 47.
coenonus, 47
complosa, 47
compta, 23
confusa
flui, 62
pusillum, 73
eloisa (pseudopecten), 48
fauna (melanocephala), 48
favor (jocosa), 73
felicia, 73
flui (confusa), 62
*valoa (pseudopecten), 28
grenadensis (melanocephala), 26
hemisiris (melanocephala), 48
intonea (circumcincta), 47
*jocosa, 47
favor, 73
prolepidis, 47
lamellata, 62
luciae (chalcocephala), 23
macrotus (circumcincta), 47
melanocephala, 68
agnostips, 48
canfieldi, 47
fauna, 48
grenadensis, 26
hemisiris, 48
modalma, 48
*pandora, 48
modalma (melanocephala), 48
moerbista, 5
ocumarensis, 73
*occulta, 62
ocumarensis (moerbista), 73
*onidus (ulocoma), 48
pampithes, 73
*pandora (melanocephala), 48
pantoia (ulocoma), 48
phroso, 48
*proviolans, 48
prolepidis (jocosa), 47
*proviolans (phroso), 48
pseudopecten, 68
bicompressa, 73
Cara, 639
eloisa, 48
*oaloa, 28
rorotai, 23
pusillum (confusa), 73
rorotai (pseudopecten), 23
roucouyana, 62
serratoria, 73
surinamensis, 62
taurepana, 73
testei, 23
ulocoma, 5
cacodela, 48°
*onidus, 48
pantoia, 48
*ypsipola, 49
WYEOMYIA (NUNEZIA) [1]
*bicornis, 73
WYEOMYIA (WYEOMYIA) [66]
*abascanta (medioalbipes), 67
abebela, 34
abia (medioalbipes), 16
ablabes (mitchellii), 35
ablechra (mitchellii), 22
abrachys (scotinomus), 46
adelpha (mitchellii), 11
aequatorialis (aphobema), 20
*aphobema, 62
aequatorialis, 20
bodkini, 5
argyrura (vanduzeei), 14
arthrostigma
bromeliarum, 67
*drapetes, 67
espartana, 11
panamena, 45
bahama, 3
minor, 14
baria (hemisagnosta), 22
bodkini (aphobema), 5
bromeliarum (arthrostigma), 67
camptocomma (scotinomus), 8
caracula, (3
celaenocephala, 28
chrysomus, 45
mataea, 22
megalodora, 22
philophone, 45
charmion, 45
chresta (scotinomus), 46
chrysomus (celaenocephala), 45
codiocampa, 45
colsoni (quasiluteoventralis), 33
conchita (vanduzeei), 14
culebrae (melanopus), 46
*drapetes (arthrostigma), 67
dymodora (simmsi), 46
espartana (arthrostigma), 11
euethes (hosautos), 45
fallax (oblita), 62
*florestan, 45
fratercula (vanduzeei), 33
gaudians, 73
Index to Topotypic Middle American Mosquitoes
gauSapata, 73
glaucocephala (mitchellii), 17
*orayii (pertinans), 26, 60
guatemala (mitchellii), 28
gynaecopus (hemisagnosta), 11
hapla (scotinomus), 46
hemisagnosta, 22
baria, 22
gynaecopus, 11
hirsuta, 30
homothe (scotinomus), 46
hosautos, 45
euethes, 45
*symmachus, 45
incana (scotinomus), 46
labesba (mitchellii), 46
leucopisthepus (scotinomus), 46
mataea (celaenocephala), 22
medioalbipes
*abascanta, 67
abia, 16
megalodora (celaenocephala), 22
melanopus, 45
culebrae, 46
minor (bahama), 14
mitchellii, 30
ablabes, 35
ablechra, 22
adelpha, 11
glaucocephala, 17
guatemala, 28
labesba, 46
ochrura, 17
rolonca, 46
violescens, 14
nigritubus, 46
oblita
fallax, 62
ochrura (mitchellii), 17
panamena (arthrostigma), 45
Antigua, 2
Bahama Islands, 3
Barbados, 4
British Guiana, 4
British Honduras, 7
Canal Zone, 43
Colombia, 7
Costa Rica, 11
Cuba, 14
Dominica, 16
Dominican Republic, 17
Ecuador, 19
El Salvador, 22
French Guiana, 23
Grenada, 26
Guadeloupe, 27
Guatemala, 27
Haiti, 29
pertinans, 61
*orayii, 26, 60
philophone (celaenocephala), 45
quasiluteoventralis, 5
colsoni, 33
robusta, 23
rolonca (mitchellii), 46
roloncetta (Simmsi), 47
scotinomus, 46
abrachys, 46
camptocomma, 8
chresta, 46
hapla, 46
homothe, 46
incana, 46
leucopisthepus, 46
simmsi, 46
dymodora, 46
roloncetta, 47
sororcula (vanduzeei), 17
stonei, 35
*symmachus (hosautos), 45
telestica, 68
vanduzeei
argyrura, 14
conchita, 14
fratercula, 33
sororcula, 17
violescens (mitchellii), 14
WYEOMYIA (subgenus unknown) [3]
aequatorianna, 20
amazonica, 20
antillarum, 27
*xelajuensis, Anopheles (A.), 28
xivylis, Culex (Mel.), 64
ybarmis, Culex (Mel.), 65
*ypsipola, Wyeomyia (D.), 49
zeteki, Culex (Mel.), 55
GEOGRAPHIC INDEX
Honduras, 29
Jamaica, 30
Martinique, 33
Mexico, 34
Middle America, 41
Nicaragua, 42
Panama, 43
Puerto Rico, 59
Ste Croix, 17
St. John, 77
Sst. Lucia, 60
St. Thomas, 77
St. Vincent, 61
Surinam, 61
Tobago, 67
Trinidad, 67
Venezuela, 72
Virgin Islands, 77
95
&@
a
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 6, 1966
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
Vi. Mosquitoes originally described from North America.
By John N. Belkin, Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J.
Heinemann.
MEMOIRS OF THE AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Issued to date:
No.
No.
No.
1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta, 1961.
A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae.
522 pages. Price: $14.50, postpaid
2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta, 1962. Ichneumonidae of
America north of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini.
305 pages, 162 maps, 116 figures. Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
3. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5.
Subfamily Diplazontinae. 305 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
. 4. Matsuda, Ryuichi, 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head.
334 pages, 111 figures. Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
. 5. Townes, Henry, Setsuya Momoi, and Marjorie Townes, 1965.
A catalogue and reclassification of the eastern Palearctic Ichneumonidae.
661 pages. Price: $18.00, postpaid
. 6. Cook, David R., 1966. The water mites of Liberia.
418 pages, 922 figures. Price: $11.00, postpaid
. 7. Delfinado, Mercedes, 1966. The culicine mosquitoes of the Philippines.
252 pages, 275 figures. Price: $ 8.00, postpaid
In Preparation:
Townes, Henry and Marjorie Townes. A catalogue and reclassification of the
Neotropic Ichneumonidae. About 450 pages. Publication late in 1966.
Cook, David R. The water mites of India. About 400 pages. Publication early in
1967.
Townes, Henry. The genera of Ichneumonidae, part 1. About 1200 pages,
including 400 plates. Publication in 1968.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Volume 1, to be completed with numbers totaling 500 pages. Price $12. 00,
postpaid. 1] Note: Orders for separate issues that total less than $8.00 must be
accompanied by payment.
Parts of Volume 1 issued to date, with individual prices:
No.
Vv No.
of No.
/ No.
1. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera,
Ichneumonidae). 75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $ 2.25, postpaid
2. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
’ I, Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the
mosquitoes of Middle e America.
-» II, Belkin, John N., et al. Methods for the collections, rearing and
preservation of mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $ 2.25, postpaid
. 3. Matthews, Robert W., 1965. The biology of Heriades carinata Cresson.
(Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). 33 pages, 23 figures.
: Price: $ 1.00, postpaid
. 4, Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
- Tl. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from
Tonga and Samoa. |
“TV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of
Salem expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $ 1.00, postpaid
5. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
V. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America. 95 pages.
Price: $ 2.75, postpaid
6. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1966.
#¥» Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
vir Mosquitoes originally described from North America. 39 pages.
Price: $1.00, postpaid
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
VI. MOSQUITOES ORIGINALLY DESCRIBED FROM
NORTH AMERICA!
By
John N. Belkin, Robert X. Schick and Sandra J. Weinembann
INTRODUCTION
Although the mosquitoes of North America north of Mexico are relatively
well known (Carpenter and LaCasse 1955), no attempt has been made to date
to study the species comprising this complex fauna on a population basis. For
such studies it is essential to determine the characteristics of all the stages
of all the nominal species from the original type localities in order to provide
nomenclatural stability. In connection with studies on the mosquitoes of Mid-
dle America (Belkin, Schick et al 1965) we have found that such topotypic ma-
terial is lacking at present for most North American species reported from
Middle America and that we cannot determine, therefore, the identity of these
species. It is very probable that there are still a number of nominal North
American species incorrectly synonymized at the present time, primarily ow-
ing to the lack of topotypic material of all stages.
In the present paper we have compiled all the available data about the
source of the original type material for all the nominal species described
from North America. We hope that this information will be useful to other
workers wishing to obtain topotypic material and will encourage taxonomic
studies on a population level. Collecting methods and the type and quantity of
topotypic material suitable for taxonomic purposes have been discussed in two
previous publications (Belkin, Hogue et al 1965; Belkin, Schick and Heinemann
1965: 2).
We thank Alan Stone for allowing us to publish herein his lectotype selec-
tions in the Chaoborinae and for providing data on type specimens deposited in
USNM. ,
A This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service Re-
search Grant AI-04379, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, in part by U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Com-
mand, Department of the Army, under Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-
2478, and in part by National Science Foundation Research Grant GB-2270.
2Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, Califor-
nia 90024.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
LIST OF SPECIES. The list consists of all the nominal species, valid or
currently considered as synonyms, arranged in the sequence followed for the
families Culicidae and Chaoboridae (considered here as subfamilies) in "A cat-
alog of the Diptera of North America" (Stone, Sabrosky et al 1965) except that
nomina nuda are not included and subgenera have been raised to generic rank
in the Chaoborinae. The Dixinae are not included as they will be covered fully
in a forthcoming publication by Peters and Cook (1966). For subspecies and ju-
nior synonyms, the species or senior synonyms in the taxonomic treatment of
the catalog are shown in [brackets]. A nominal species marked with an aster-
isk (*) is the type species of a generic group taxon. The citation of author,
date and page refers to the bibliography in the catalog.
Under TYPE, all the available data pertaining to the type material are
given as derived from the original descriptions and other published sources.
Type specimens were not examined in the preparation of this paper and there-
fore in some instances the kind of type specimen(s) (holotype or syntypes) could
not be determined; possibly some lectotype selections were missed. The num-
ber in parentheses following the sex or stage of the type(s) indicates the col-
lection, rearing or slide number. In the statement of the type locality, [brack-
ets] are used to inclose corrections and (parentheses) for counties (for U.S. A.).
Dates of the type collections and names of collectors are given whenever they
could be determined. At the end of the type data (enclosed in parentheses) is
an indication of the type depository, abbreviated as in the catalog of mosqui-
toes (Stone, Knight and Starcke 1959), together with references to lectotype
selections and other published data regarding the types.
Under BIONOMICS, all available data about the original collection are
given directly, first for the immature stages and then for the adults. When no
information was given in the original description for the immature stages, data
are supplied in [brackets] from other sources. Such data should be used only
as a general guide for locating the probable breeding sites.
LIST OF LOCALITIES: There are separate lists for Canada, Greenland
and the United States. For Canada and the U.S.A. the lists are arranged al-
phabetically by province or state and within each of these, alphabetically by the
specific locality (followed by county or parish for the U.S.A.). The number
preceding the nominal species refers to the number assigned to it in the list of
Species. 3
RESTRICTIONS OF TYPE LOCALITIES
We take this opportunity to restrict the type localities of 10 species de-
scribed by Fabricius, Robineau-Desvoidy, Say and Walker from the United
States without indication of the State. This is done in accordance with Recom-
mendation 72E of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and on
the basis of the data specified in each case below. For several other species
described from a State without precise locality it is suggested that a restric-
tion of the type locality be made when reared material becomes available. In
order to insure stability and to preserve current taxonomic interpretation of
important species it will be necessary to designate neotypes for several spe-
cies whose types are not extant.
12. Anopheles (A. ) punctipennis (Say, 1823: 9). In the original description
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 3
it is stated first "Inhabits the United States" but in the discussion following
Say adds "it is common on the Mississippi, and is troublesome to travellers"
and ''I observed this species in considerable numbers on the Eastern shore of
Maryland."' Later, Say (1824: 357) stated that he described punctipennis in 1819.
This might be interpreted to indicate that he described this species some time
during the Long Expedition to the Rocky Mountains while he was away from
Philadelphia from early 1819 to late 1820 (James 1823) and that he had before
him only material from the Mississippi. However, it is possible that he de-
scribed the species in Philadelphia before the expedition and added to the de-
scription upon his return. Since there is no material extant and there is no
way of determining exactly the specimens in Say's hands at the time of the de-
scription one must rely on the statements in the original published description
and consider that the type material came from both the Mississippi and Mary-
land. On this basis we restrict the type locality of punctipennis to the vicinity
of Chestertown, Kent Co., Maryland where this species, as currently inter-
preted, was collected by Bishopp, Cory and Stone (1933). Since it appears that
"‘punctipennis’’ may be a polytypic species or a sibling complex (Bellamy,1956)
it is very important to designate a neotype from this locality to preserve the
current usage.
14. Anopheles (A.) quadrimaculatus Say, 1824a: 356. No type material is
extant. Say's original description states 'Inhabits North-west Territory."
The material was collected on Long's Second Expedition (Keating 1824) and it
is most likely that it was obtained between 25 June and 2 July 1823 between
Prairie du Chien (Wisconsin) and Fort Anthony [Fort Snelling] (Minnesota)
while Say was in command of the party which ascended the Mississippi by
barge. This is also the only area in the Northwest Territory of that period
where quadrimaculatus, as currently interpreted, is common. Accordingly,
we are restricting the type locality of this species to the vicinity of Wabasha,
Minnesota where quadrimaculatus has been reported to be very abundant (Dag-
gy, Muegge and Riley 1940). A neotype for this important species should be
designated from this locality as soon as possible to insure the preservation of
this name in the current usage.
24. Mansonia (C.) perturbans (Walker, 1856b: 428); 39. Psorophora (P.)
conterrens (Walker, 1856b:427); 136. Aedes (O.) sollicitans (Walker, 1856b:
427); 198. Culex (N.) territans Walker, 1856b: 428. All 4 species were de-
scribed by Walker from the "United States", all but territans are represented
by type specimens at the British Museum and there is general agreement at
present as to the taxonomic interpretation of all of them. Since these species
were described at the same time we consider probable that they were col-
lected by one individual in one locality. Such an assemblage of species is en-
countered commonly now along the Atlantic coastal plain from New England to
Texas. We believe that the most likely locality for Walker's specimens was
one of the major centers along the Atlantic seaboard and therefore restrict the
type locality of all 4 species to the vicinity of Charleston, South Carolina.
This locality is also near the center of the known distributions of these spe-
cies along the Atlantic coastal plain.
35. Psorophora (P.) ciliata (Fabricius, 1794: 401); 38. Psorophora (P.)
boscii Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827: 413. The types of both nominal species (cur-
rently synonymized) are not extant but are indicated in the original descrip-
tions to have come from ''Habitat in Carolina Mus. Dom. Bosc" (ciliata) and
"Habitat in Carolina (Musaeum D. Bosc)" (boscii). This material was un-
doubtedly collected by Louis Auguste Guillaume Bosc d'Antic who was in the
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, ‘no. 6, 1966
United States from 1798 to 1800 and stayed, at least part of this period, at the
gardens of André Michaux (Cuvier 1829: 81-82) whose remnants may still exist
in Ten Mile near Charleston, South Carolina (Coker 1911). The type locality of
both these species can be restricted therefore to the vicinity of Ten Mile Sta-
tion, Charleston Co., South Carolina. |
37. Psorophora (P.) rubida (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827: 404). The origin of
the nonextant type of Robineau-Desvoidy's species was indicated as ''Habitat in
Carolina. . . (Musaeum D. Serville).'' The Serville referred to is probably
Jean Guillaume Audinet-Serville who as a young man was a protege of Mme de
Tigny and became associated through her with Olivier, Latreille, Bosc and
other outstanding French naturalists of that period (Amyot 1858: 346). Audinet-
Serville never visited the United States and it is likely that the above mentioned
material came into his possession either from Bosc or from the Palisot de
Beauvois collection. Bosc is reported to have been extremely generous with
his American collection (Cuvier 1829: 82-83) and may have given some of his
material to Audinet-Serville when the latter was entrusted by Latreille to
finish the work of Palisot de Beauvois (1805-1821) on the insects collected in
Africa and America. In either case this material is likely to have been col-
lected in the Michaux gardens, Ten Mile near Charleston, South Carolina,
where it is known Bosc spent considerable time (Cuvier 1829: 81-82) and which
was also visited by Palisot de Beauvois (Ewan 1957: 24). Therefore, we are
restricting the type locality of this species to the vicinity of Ten Mile Station,
Charleston Co., South Carolina (see also above under 35. Psorophora (P.)
ciliata). 7
38. Psorophora (P.) boscii Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827:413. Type locality
restricted to vicinity of Ten Mile Station, Charleston Co., South Carolina.
For explanation see under 35. Psorophora (P.) ciliata.
39. Psorophora (P.) conterrens (Walker, 1856b: 427). Type locality re-
stricted to vicinity of Charleston, South Carolina. For explanation see under
24. Mansonia (C.) perturbans.
136. Aedes (O.) sollicitans (Walker, 1856b: 427). Type locality restricted
to vicinity of Charleston, South Carolina. For explanation see under 24. Man-
sonia (C.) perturbans.
198. Culex (N.) territans Walker, 1856b: 428. Type locality restricted to
vicinity of Charleston, South Carolina. For explanation see under 24. Man-
sonia (C.) perturbans. :
. 208. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus Say, 1823: 10. We agree with Stone
(1957: 342-343) that this species is a senior synonym of Culex fatigans Wiede-
mann, 1828: 10 and Anopheles ferruginosus Wiedemann 1828: 12. The only
statement in the original paper which might contradict this interpretation is
"We found them in great numbers on the Mississippi in May and June." Say
travelled on the Mississippi from the mouth of the Ohio River on 30 May 1819
to St. Louis where he remained until 21 June 1819 (James 1823). Ross (1947)
states that quinquefasciatus does not appear in numbers in light trap collec-
tions in southern Illinois until July or August but records adults as early as 17
June. In this area at this time of the year Culex pipiens is much more abun-
dant than quinquefasciatus and it is probable that Say observed both species or
that he even may have included Aedes vexans in his biological notes. On the
other hand it is quite possible that Say's description was based on specimens
collected later when he returned from the Long expedition at about the middle
of October 1820 by boat on the Mississippi River to New Orleans (Long in
James 1823: 197). This view is supported by the fact that the type locality of
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 5)
ferruginosus, which was based on specimens identified as quinquefasciatus by
Say, is stated to be New Orleans. We prefer this interpretation and therefore
restrict to type locality of quinquefasciatus to the vicinity of New Orleans (Or-
leans Par.), Louisiana.
| LIST OF SPECIES
Culicinae
1. Anopheles (A.) atropos Dyar & Knab, 1906b: 160. TYPE: Lectotype 9,
Florida Keys (Monroe Co.), Florida, Hiram Byrd (USNM, 10029; selection of
Stone and Knight 1956b: 276). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools in permanent
brackish and saltwater marshes, often in very shallow pools].
*2. Anopheles (A.) barberi Coquillett, 1903e: 310. TYPE: Holotype 9°,
Plummer's Island (Montgomery Co.), Maryland, 17 Aug 1903, H. S. Barber
(USNM, 6959). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes and occasionally in artificial
containers].
3. Anopheles (A.) bradleyi King, 1939: 468. TYPE: Holotype ? with asso-
ciated larval and pupal skins, near St. Johns River (Brevard Co.), Florida, 5
Feb 1938, T. E. McNeel (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in roadside ditch con-
taining Chara, near river. :
4. Anopheles (A.) crucians Wiedemann, 1828: 12. TYPE: Adults, Penn-
sylvania and New Orleans (Orleans Par.), Louisiana (NMW). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in springs, ponds, lakes, swamps, and semipermanent and perma-
nent pools, usually shaded and with vegetation].
5. Anopheles (A.) earlei Vargas, 1943: 9. TYPE: Holotype with dis-
sected genitalia on 2 slides, Jefferson Co., Wisconsin, 10 July (USNM). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae usually in cold clear water in shallow margins of semiper-
manent and permanent ponds overgrown with emergent and floating vegetation].
6. Anopheles (A.) freeborni Aitken, 1939: 192. TYPE: Holotype 0 (4889),
Davis (Yolo Co.), California, 6 Nov 1937, T.H.G. Aitken (CAS). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in clear seepage water, in roadside pools, in rice fields and similar
habitats].
7. Anopheles (A.) georgianus King, 1939: 462. TYPE: Holotype ? with as-
sociated larval and pupal skins, near Quitman (Brooks Co.), Georgia, 16 Feb
1938, R. E. Bellamy and W. V. King (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in hoof
prints and small pot holes in seepage area at head of small stream.
8. Anopheles (A.) occidentalis Dyar & Knab, 1906b: 159. TYPE: Holotype
°, Stanford University (Santa Clara Co.), California, 26 May 1903, Isabel
McCracken (USNM, 10028). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent pools, hill-
side seepages, lagoons, quiet streams and similar habitats].
9. Anopheles (A.) perplexens Ludlow, 1907:267. TYPE: Holotype ?, Camp
Roosevelt, Mt. Gretna (Lebanon Co.), Pennsylvania, 25 Aug 1906, E.B. Whit-
temore (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in limestone springs and
margins of streams emerging from them].
| 10. Anopheles (A.) franciscanus McCracken, 1904: 12 [= ssp. of pseudo-
BERS i TYPE: Lectotype 0 (456-1), genitalia slide missing, Stanford
University (Santa Clara Co.), California, 5 May 1903 (Los Angeles County
Museum; selection of Aitken 1945: 329). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shallow
pools and along margins of receding streams, usually in full sun and with mats
of green algae].
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
11. Anopheles (A.) boydi Vargas, 1939: 361 [= franciscanus]. TYPE:
Eggs, Central California (NE). BIONOMICS: [As for franciscanus].
12. Anopheles (A.) punctipennis (Say, 1823: 9). TYPE: Adult, United
States [Locality restricted to vicinity of Chestertown (Kent Co.), Maryland]
(NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in wide variety of ground waters but with pref-
erence for shaded, cool, clear water, particularly in hill streams].
13. Anopheles (A.) hyemalis (Fitch, 1847: 281) [= punctipennis]. TYPE:
Syntypes o, 2, Eastern New York, late autumn and early spring (LU). BIO-
NOMICS: [As for punctipennis].
14. Anopheles (A.) quadrimaculatus Say, 1824a: 356. TYPE: 9, North-
west Territory [Restricted to vicinity of Wabasha (Wabasha Co.), Minnesota]
(NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae most common inclear, exposed or partially
shaded, freshwater pools, ponds, lakes, lagoons or swamps and in dense aqua-
tic vegetation along margins of large slow-flowing rivers].
15. Anopheles (A.) annulimanus van der Wulp, 1867: 129 [= quadrimacu-
latus]|. TYPE: 0’, Wisconsin (LU). BIONOMICS: [As for quadrimaculatus].
16. Anopheles (A.) walkeri Theobald, 1901a: 199. TYPE: ?, Lake Simcoe
(Simcoe Co.), Ontario, Sept, E. M. Walker (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
freshwater marshes containing emergent or floating vegetation or debris].
Specimens taken from beds of reeds close to low marshy shore of lake.
17. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) rutilus (Coquillett, 1896a: 44). TYPE:
Lectotype o, Georgiana (Brevard Co.), Florida (USNM, 903; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957c: 199). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes, less often in
artificial containers and arboreal bromeliads (Tillandsia utriculata)].
18. Toxorhynchites (L.) septentrionalis (Dyar & Knab, 1906d: 249) [= ssp.
of rutilis]|. TYPE: Holotype 0, Woodstock (Shenandoah Co.), Virginia, 24
Aug 1904, F. C. Pratt (USNM, 9952). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes and
artificial containers].
19. Toxorhynchites (L.) herrickii (Theobald, 1906: 241) [= septentrionalis].
TYPE: o, [probably Agricultural College], Mississippi, Sept 1906, Glenn Her-
rick (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae carnivorous, in cavity of iron post supporting
water tank.
20. Wyeomyia (W.) haynei Dodge, 1947: 118. TYPE: Holotype \, Lexing-
ton Co., 8.2 mi SW of Columbia, near the Watling Road, between the Columbia
Air Base and U.S. Highway No. 1, South Carolina, Apr 1945, O. L. Cart-
wright (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in pitchers of Sarracenia purpurea veno-
sa.
21. Wyeomyia (W.) antoinetta Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 263 [= mitchellii].
TYPE: Holotype 0, Estero (Lee Co.), Florida, May 1906, J. B. Van Duzee
(USNM, 12197). BIONOMICS: Bred from larva in epiphytic bromeliad, in as-
sociation with W. vanduzeei. ,
*22. Wyeomyia (W.) smithii (Coquillett, 190la: 260). TYPE: Holotype 9,
Lahaway (Ocean Co.), New Jersey, Mar-Apr, J. B. Smith (USNM, 5799).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pitchers of Sarracenia purpurea].
23. Wyeomyia (W.) vanduzeei Dyar & Knab, 1906a: 138. TYPE: Lectotype
o (356.5) with genitalia slide (349), Estero (Lee Co.), Florida, 22 Apr or 6
May 1906, J. B. Van Duzee (USNM, 9988; selection of Stone and Knight 1957b:
126). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in epiphytic bromeliad.
*24. Mansonia (Coquillettidia) perturbans (Walker, 1856b: 428). TYPE: 9,
United States [Restricted to vicinity of Charleston (Charleston Co.), South
Carolina] (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae attached to submerged roots and stems
of aquatic vegetation in ponds and swamps].
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 7
25. Mansonia (C.) testacea (van der Wulp, 1867: 128) [= perturbans|.
TYPE: o, Wisconsin (LM). BIONOMICS: [As for perturbans]. |
26. Mansonia (C.) ochropus (Dyar & Knab, 190%7a: 100) [= perturbans].
TYPE: Holotype ?, Center Harbor (Belknap Co.), New Hampshire, 19 July
1902, H. G. Dyar (USNM, -10261). BIONOMICS: [As for perturbans]. Female
taken while flying in woods during daytime.
27. Uranotaenia anhydor Dyar, 1907: 128. TYPE: Holotype larva, Sweet-
water Junction, near San Diego (San Diego Co.), California, 2 June 1906, H.G.
Dyar and A. N. Caudell (NE). BIONOMICS: Larva in temporary swamp full of
reeds, associated with Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, A. occidentalis, Culex
tarsalis and C. erythrothorax. |
28. Uranotaenia syntheta Dyar & Shannon, 1924a: 189 [= ssp. of anhydor].
TYPE: Holotype ?, Mission (Hidalgo Co.), Texas, 15 Apr 1924, R. L. Turner
(USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in still water along margin of shallow grassy
ditch and in small depressions along stream with mats of water hyacinths].
29. Uranotaenia continentalis Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 187 [= lowii]. TYPE:
Larvae, Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana, 6-9 Sept and 23 Oct
1904, J. W. Dupree (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in grassy shallow margins of
ponds and lakes, usually exposed to sunlight].
30. Uranotaenia sapphirina (Osten Sacken, 1868: 47). TYPE: o, 2, Wash-
ington, District of Columbia and Brooklyn, New York, Brevoort (MCZ). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in permanent pools, ponds and lakes that contain emergent
and floating vegetation exposed to sunlight].
31. Uranotaenia coquilletti Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 187 [= sapphirina].
TYPE: Larva, [Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana], J. W. Du-
pree (LU). BIONOMICS: [As for sapphirina].
32. Orthopodomyia alba Baker,1936: 1. TYPE: Holotype & with associated
larval and pupal skins, Ithaca (Tompkins Co.), New York, summer 1934, F.C.
Baker (USNM, 51387). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in rotholes of elm and
maple.
33. Orthopodomyia californica Bohart, 1950:399. TYPE: Holotype ¢ with
associated larval and pupal skins, Elkhorn Ferry, near Sacramento (Yolo
Co.), California, 12 Apr 1948, R. M. Bohart (USNM). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
cottonwood treehole.
+34, Orthopodomyia signifera (Coquillett, 1896a: 43). TYPE: Holotype 9,
Washington, District of Columbia, June, D. W. Coquillett (USNM). BIONOM-
ICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
*35. Psorophora (Psorophora) ciliata (Fabricius, 1794: 401). TYPE:
Adult, ‘Habitat in Carolina. Mus. Dom. Bosc." [Restricted to vicinity of Ten
Mile Station (Charleston Co.), South Carolina] (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
temporary, unshaded rain pools].
36. Psorophora (P.) molesta (Wiedemann, 1820a: 7) [= ciliata]. TYPE:
Adult, Georgia (NE). BIONOMICS: [As for ciliata].
37. Psorophora (P.) rubida (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827: 404) [= ciliata].
TYPE: ?, "Habitat in Carolina. . . (Musaeum D. Serville.)'' [Restricted to
vicinity of Ten Mile Station (Charleston Co.), South Carolina] (NE). BIONOM-
ICS: [As for ciliata].
38. Psorophora (P.) boscii Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827: 413 [= ciliata].
TYPE: Adult, "Habitat in Carolina. (Musaeum D. Bosc. )"' [Restricted to vi-
cinity of Ten Mile Station (Charleston Co.), South Carolina] (NE). BIONOM-
ICS: [As for ciliata]. 7
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
39. Psorophora (P.) conterrens (Walker, 1856b: 427)[= ciliata]. TYPE: 9,
United States [Restricted to vicinity of Charleston (Charleston Co.), South
Carolina] (BM). BIONOMICS: [As for ciliata].
40. Psorophora (P.) ctites Dyar, 1918c: 126 [= ciliata]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2, Brownsville (Cameron Co.), Texas, 28 Aug 1916, M.M. High (USNM,
21717; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 283). BIONOMICS: [As for ciliata].
41. Psorophora (P.) howardii Coquillett, 190la: 258. TYPE: Holotype <,
Hartsville (Darlington Co.), South Carolina, 23 July 1901, W. K. Coker (USNM,
5793). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shaded or unshaded temporary rainpools].
*42. Psorophora (Janthinosoma) cyanescens (Coquillett, 1902d: 137). TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Brownsville (Cameron Co.), Texas, May (USNM, 6308; selection
of one and Knight 1955: 283). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in sunlit temporary rain-
pools}.
*43. Psorophora (J.) musica (Say, 1829: 149); sayi (Dyar & Knab, 1906c:
181), new name; sayi (Theobald, 1907: 155), new name [= ferox]. TYPE: Adult,
Re (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary rainpools in or near wooded
areas].
44. Psorophora (J.) horrida (Dyar & Knab, 1908: 56). TYPE: Lectotype
?, Corinth (Alcorn Co.), Mississippi, 14 Aug 1904, H. S. Barber (USNM, 11999;
selection of Roth 1945: 4). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shaded temporary pools af-
ter summer rains].
45. Psorophora (J.) longipalpus Randolph & O'Neill, 1944: 88. TYPE: Lec-
totype 2, Harris Co., Texas, 11-1-39 (USNM; selection of Stone 1962: 246).
BIONOMICS: [As for longipalpis].
46. Psorophora (J.) longipalpis Roth, 1945: 13 [= longipalpus]. TYPE: Holo-
type & with entire abdomen on slide, Fayetteville (Washington Co.), Arkansas,
24 Aug 1933, H. H. Schwardt (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in heavily shaded
temporary rainpools].
47. Psorophora (Grabhamia) columbiae (Dyar & Knab, 1906a: 135) [= con-
finnis]. TYPE: Holotype 9, Grassymead, near Fort Hunt (Fairfax Co.), Vir-
ginia, 21 June, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 9974). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary
rainpools, usually muddy and without vegetation].
48. Psorophora (G.) floridensis (Dyar & Knab, 1906a: 135) [= confinnis].
TYPE: Holotype 2? (43), Alligator Creek (? Seminole Co.), Florida, 18 Mar
1905, A. N. Caudell (USNM, 9972). BIONOMICS: [As for columbiae].
49. Psorophora (G.) texana (Dyar & Knab, 1906a: 135) [= confinnis].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Brownsville (Cameron Co.), Texas, 21 May 1904, H. S.
Barber (USNM, 9971). BIONOMICS: [As for columbiae].
*50. Psorophora (G.) discolor (Coquillett, 1903d: 256). TYPE: Holotype 9,
Delair (Camden Co.), New Jersey, J. B. Smith (USNM, 6894). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in temporary ground pools and rice fields].
51. Psorophora (G.) nana (Coquillett, 1903d: 256) [= pygmaea]. TYPE:
Lectotype $, Key West (Munroe Co.), Florida, Aug 1901, August Busck
(USNM, 6893; selection of Stone and Knight 1955: 285). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in temporary rainpools].
52. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) aboriginis Dyar, 1917b:99. TYPE: Lectotype ¢,
Longmire Springs, Mt. Rainier National Park (Pierce Co.), Washington, 18
June 1917, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 21544; selection of Knight 1951: 96). BIONOM-
ICS: Bred from larvae in temporary puddles in marsh and in woodland pools
near marsh.
53. Aedes (O.) abserratus (Felt & Young, 1904: 312). TYPE: Holotype
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 9
adult, Elizabethtown (Essex Co.), New York, 14 June (NY). BIONOMICS:
Bred from larva in cold mountain pool.
54. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) centrotus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1917: 747 [= ab-
serratus]. TYPE: Lectotype ?, White River (Algoma Co.), Ontario, 24-25
June 1907, F. Knab (USNM, 12281; selection of Knight 1951: 98). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in cold pools]. Females taken while biting in forest during the day-
time.
95. Aedes (O.) dysanor Dyar, 1921c: 70 [= abserratus]. TYPE: Holotype
&, Plattsburgh (Clinton Co.), New York, Apr 1905, H. G. Dyar and Edna Hud-
son (USNM, 24023). BIONOMICS: [As for abserratus].
56. Aedes (O.) aloponotum Dyar, 1917b: 98. TYPE: Holotype °, Lake Cush-
man (Mason Co.), Washington, 28 June 1917, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 21543). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary pools in open swamps, edges of
grassy marshes or in woodland pools]. |
57. Aedes (O.) atlanticus Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 198. TYPE: Syntypes lar-
vae, [New Brunswick] (Middlesex Co.), New Jersey, 1 Aug, J. B. Smith; San-
ford (Seminole Co.), Florida, 17 Mar 1905, H. G. Dyar (NE). BIONOMICS:
Larvae in woodland pools with Aedes canadensis and Aedes sylvestris (Smith)
and in semipermanent marshy pool, containing leaves of small water plants,
joined to small ditch (Dyar). Adults in low swampy woods (Dyar).
*58. Aedes (O.) aurifer (Coquillett, 1903d: 255). TYPE: Lectotype ?, Cen-
ter Harbor (Belknap Co.), New Hampshire, 25 June, H. G. Dyar (USNM,
12022; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in tem-
porary pools, especially in cranberry bogs].
59. Aedes (O.) barri Rueger, 1958: 34. TYPE: Holotype o (20 V I 56-18)
with associated larval and pupal skins, alongside of north boundary road,
about 0.3 mi from corner west of north arm of Lake Itasca, Itasca State Park
(Clearwater Co.), Minnesota, 20 May 1956, M. E. Rueger (USNM, 64085).
BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in lakeside marsh of cattails and sedge grass.
60. Aedes (O.) bicristatus Thurman & Winkler, 1950: 239. TYPE: Lecto-
type o with associated pupal skin and genitalia slide, near Kelseyville, Town-
ship 13 N, Range 9 W, Sections 11 and 12, elev. 1390 ft (Lake Co.), Califor-
nia, 10 Mar 1950, E. C. Winkler (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a:
215). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in grassy roadside ditch and pools in
flooded meadow, full and partial sun.
61. Aedes (O.) bimaculatus (Coquillett, 1902g: 84). TYPE: Holotype 2,
Brownsville (Cameron Co.), Texas, 16 June, C.H.T. Townsend (USNM, 6259).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in semipermanent ground pools and ditches].
62. Aedes (O.) cacothius Dyar, 1923: 44. TYPE: Lectotype 2, Shoshone
Point, elev. 8200 ft, Yellowstone Park, Wyoming, 27 June 1922, H. G. Dyar
(USNM, 25952; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in snow water pools]. Adults taken biting near noon in sun, on
exposed hillside.
63. Aedes (O.) campestris Dyar & Knab, 1907b: 213. TYPE: Lectotype ?,
Oxbow, Saskatchewan, 18-19 June 1907, F. Knab (USNM, 10874; selection of
Stone and Knight 1956a: 216). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by melting
snow or rain].
64. Aedes (O.) callithotrys Dyar, 1920a: 16 [= campestris]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (1159) with genitalia slide (1159), Whitehorse, Yukon, 17 July 1919,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 22616; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 216). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by melting snow or rain]. Adults taken in
pine country.
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
*65. Aedes (O.) canadensis (Theobald, 1901b:3). TYPE: 0, 9, De Grassi
Point, Lake Simcoe, Ontario, E. M. Walker (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae most
commonly in temporary or semipermanent shaded woodland pools containing
fallen leaves]. Adults taken in woods and swamps.
66. Aedes (O.) nivitarsis (Coquillett, 1904f: 168) [= canadensis]. TYPE:
Lectotype °, [Garret Mountain], Paterson (Passaic Co.), New Jersey, 13 or
17 May, J. B. Smith (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 222). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary or semipermanent woodland pools].
67. Aedes (O.) mathesoni Middlekauff, 1944: 42 [= ssp. of canadensis].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Kissimmee (Osceola Co.), Florida, 17 Sept 1943 (USNM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in abandoned foxhole and probably in temporary or semi-
permanent woodland pools]. Female caught in light trap.
68. Aedes (O.) cantator (Coquillett, 1903d: 255). TYPE: Holotype 2, [Sum-
mit] (Union Co.), New Jersey, 6 May, LaRue Holmes (USNM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in coastal marshes and pools, fresh and salty].
69. Aedes (O.) cataphylla Dyar, 1916b: 86. TYPE: Holotype ?, Fallen
Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 11 June 1916 (USNM, 20354).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in cold, temporary ground pools]. Adult taken biting by
day in woods.
70. Aedes (O.) prodotes Dyar, 1917c: 118 [= cataphylla]. TYPE: Holo-
type 0’, Bozeman (Gallatin Co.), Montana, 7 May 1907, R. A. Cooley (USNM,
21546). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in cold, temporary ground pools].
71. Aedes (O.) pacificensis Hearle, 1927: 101 [= ssp. of cataphylla].
TYPE: Holotype 0, Discovery Island, British Columbia, elev. ca. 100 ft., 12
Apr 1920, W. B. Anderson (CNC, 2501). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed
by melting snow and floodwaters]. Adults taken on island with dry wooded and
bare rocky ridges, with an occasional small salt marsh near shore.
72. Aedes (O.) lazarensis (Felt & Young, 1904: 312) [= communis].
TYPE: o&%, 2, larva, Elizabethtown (Essex Co.), New York, 9-11 June 1904,
E. P. Felt (NY). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in cold mountain pool.
73. Aedes (O.) borealis (Ludlow, 1911: 178) [= communis]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2, [Fort Gibbon], Alaska, July (USNM, 27809; selection of Stone and
Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by melting snow in
spring].
74. Aedes (O.) tahoensis Dyar, 1916b: 82 [= communis]. TYPE: Lectotype
o (FE 14), Fallen Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 5 June 1916
(USNM, 20352; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 225). BIONOMICS: Bred
from larvae in temporary, clear pools formed by melting snow.
75. Aedes (O.) altiusculus Dyar, 1917b: 100 [= communis]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o, "Indian Henry's,'’ Mt. Rainier National Park (Pierce Co.), Washing-
ton, 13 June 1917, Dyar, Allen and Flett (USNM, 21545; selection of Stone and
Knight 1956a: 214). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in melted snow in moun-
tain meadow.
76. Aedes (O.) masamae Dyar, 1920d: 166 [= communis]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Crater Lake (Klamath Co.), Oregon, elev. 8000 ft, 29 July 1920,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 23832). BIONOMICS: [As for borealis].
77. Aedes (O.) prolixus Dyar, 1922a:2 [= communis]. TYPE: Lectotype
o& with genitalia slide (1579), Anchorage, Alaska, 11 June 1921, J. M. Aldrich
(USNM, 24953; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 224). BIONOMICS: [As for
borealis].
78. Aedes (O.) decticus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1917: 737. TYPE: Holo-
type , White River (Algoma Co.), Ontario, 25 June 1907, F. Knab (USNM,
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 11
12280). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in sphagnum bogs, swamps and woodland pools].
79. Aedes (O.) pseudodiantaeus Smith,1952: 21 [= decticus|. TYPE: Holo-
type o', Belchertown (Hampshire Co.), Massachusetts, 10 May 1950, M. E.
Smith (USNM). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in sphagnum bog.
80. Aedes (O.) diantaeus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913: fig 167. TYPE: Lec-
totype o with genitalia slide (484), Dublin (Cheshire Co.), New Hampshire,
June 1909, A. Busck (USNM, 12678; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 217).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in spring pools formed by melted snow.
81. Aedes (O.) curriei (Coquillett, 1901a: 259) [= dorsalis]. TYPE: Holo-
type $, Boise (Ada Co.), Idaho, C. B. Sampson (USNM, 5798; not a lectotype as
stated by Dyar and Knab 1906: 202, see Stone and Knight 1956a: 216). BIONOM-
ICS: [Larvae in temporary ground pools].
82. Aedes (O.) onondagensis (Felt, 1904: 304) [= dorsalis]. TYPE: Holo-
type ?, vicinity of Lake Onondaga, Syracuse (Onondaga Co.), New York, 19
Sept an (NY). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary pools, salt or
fresh}.
83. Aedes (O.) lativittatus (Coquillett, 1906b: 109) [= dorsalis]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Arden (Alameda Co.), California, 19 July 1903 (USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight 1956a: 220). BIONOMICS: [As for onondagensis].
84. Aedes (O.) quaylei Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 202 [= dorsalis]. TYPE:
Syntypes larvae, California (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae in salt marshes.
85. Aedes (O.) mediolineatus (Ludlow, 1907: 129) [= dorsalis]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Fort Lincoln (Burleigh Co.), North Dakota, June, July or Aug
(USNM, 10282; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 220). BIONOMICS: [As for
onondagensis].
86. Aedes (O.) dupreei (Coquillett, 1904a: 10). TYPE: Lectotype & with
genitalia slide, Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana, J. W. Du-
pree (USNM, 7340; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 217). _BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in temporary woodland rainpools, hiding among leaves and debris on
the bottom ]. |
87. Aedes (O.) excrucians (Walker, 1856b: 429). TYPE: Adult, Nova Sco-
tia (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools in open swamps, along
edges of flooded grassy marshes and in woodland pools, during the spring].
88. Aedes (O.) siphonalis (Grossbeck, 1904a: 332) [= excrucians]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Livingston Park, near New Brunswick (Middlesex Co.), New
_ Jersey, 10 May (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 225). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae probably in temporary pools, in spring].
89. Aedes (O.) abfitchii (Felt, 1904: 381) [= excrucians]. TYPE: Syntypes
larvae, Karner (Albany Co.), New York, early May (NY). BIONOMICS: [As for
siphonalis].
90. Aedes (O.) sansoni Dyar & Knab, 1909a: 102 [= excrucians]. TYPE:
Lectotype ? (10), Banff, Alberta, summer 1908, N. B. Sanson (USNM, 12195;
selection of Dyar 1917: 114). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in river bed pools (Dyar
1917: 114)|.
91. ee (O.) euedes Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913: fig. 191[= excru-
cians]. TYPE: Lectotype o with genitalia slide (446), Trenton (Hastings Co.),
Ontario, 24 May 1900, J. Fletcher (USNM, 12272; selection of Stone and Knight
1956a: 217). BIONOMICS: [As for excrucians].
92. Aedes (O.) fitchii (Felt & Young, 1904: 312). TYPE: Adult, larva,
Karner (Albany Co.), New York, 10 May (NY). BIONOMICS: Larvae in wood-
land pool.
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
93. Aedes (O.) palustris Dyar, 1916b: 89 [= fitchii]. TYPE: Lectotype 0
(FK7), Fallen Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 1-6 June 1916,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 20351; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIONOM-
ICS: Larvae in temporary grassy pools and marshes.
94. Aedes (O.) pricei Dyar, 1917a:16 [= fitchii]. TYPE: Holotype ?, Fal-
len Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 9 June 1916, H. G. Dyar
(USNM, 21043; see Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIONOMICS: Larvae in
grassy marshes.
95. Aedes (O.) mimesis Dyar, 1917c: 116 [= fitchii]. TYPE: Holotype <,
Drummond (Granite Co.), Montana, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 21553). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in early spring pools, especially flooded grassy edges of ponds and :
marshes].
96. Aedes (O.) fletcheri (Coquillett, 1902g: 84)[= flavescens]. TYPE: Lec-
totype ?, Carnduff, Assiniboia, Saskatchewan, 28 May 1901, F. Fletcher
(USNM, 6255; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in semipermanent ground pools in spring].
97. Aedes (O.) pallens Ross, 1943: 148 [= ssp. of fulvus]. TYPE: Holo-
type o with genitalia slide, New Orleans (Orleans Par.), Louisiana, 10 Sept
1914, W. V. King (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in deep temporary pools fol-
lowing very heavy rains].
98. Aedes (O.) grossbecki Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 201. TYPE: Syntypes lar-
vae, ees Jersey (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in early temporary woodlands
pools}.
99. Aedes (O.) sylvicola (Grossbeck, 1906: 129) [= grossbecki]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Livingston Park, near New Brunswick (Middlesex Co.), New
Jersey, 5-6 May 1904, J. A. Grossbeck (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight
1956a: 225). BIONOMICS: Larvae in early, freshwater woodland pools.
100. Aedes (O.) hexodontus Dyar, 1916b: 83. TYPE: Lectotype 2? (FJ-13)
with associated larval skin, Fallen Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), Cali-
fornia, 7 June 1916, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 20353; selection of Knight 1951: 93).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in temporary pools.
101. Aedes (O.) cyclocerculus Dyar, 1920a: 23 [= hexodontus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype 0 (G-22) with associated larval and pupal skins, Prince Rupert, British
Columbia, 11 May 1919, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 22617; selection of Knight 1951:
93). BIONOMICS: Larvae in muskeg pools.
102. Aedes (O.) leuconotips Dyar, 1920a: 24 [= hexodontus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype 0 (N) with associated larval skin, Prince Rupert, British Columbia, 26
May 1919, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 22618; selection of Knight 1951: 93). BIONOM-
ICS: Larvae in muskeg pools.
103. Aedes (O.) labradorensis Dyar & Shannon, 1925b: 78 [= hexodontus].
TYPE: Holotype 2, Hawk's Harbor, Labrador, [Newfoundland], 20 July 1908,
Admiral Peary's 1908 polar expedition (USNM, 27862). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in pools formed by melting snow, probably on the tundra, in spring].
104. Aedes (O.) impiger (Walker, 1848:6). TYPE: Holotype 2, St. Mar-
tin's Falls [St. Martin], Albany River, Hudson's Bay, Ontario, G. Barston
(BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by melting snow].
105. Aedes (O.) nearcticus Dyar, 1919a: 32 [= impiger]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (1391), Bernard Harbour, Northwest Territories, 19 July 1915, F. Jo-
hannsen (CNC, 1877; selection of Vockeroth 1954: 110). BIONOMICS: [As for
impiger ].
106. Aedes (O.) implicatus Vockeroth, 1954: 110. TYPE: Holotype & with
associated larval and pupal skins, Rupert House, Quebec, 1949, D. P. Gray
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 13
(CNC, 6031). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools in early spring, often
in forests].
107. Aedes (O.) increpitus Dyar, 1916b: 87. TYPE: Lectotype -, Fallen
Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 3 June 1916, H. G. Dyar
(USNM, 20350; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in beach pools filled by high waves and seepage, in marsh pools, very rarely
in clear cold mountain or larger grassy marshes. 3 i
108. Aedes (O.) vittatus (Theobald, 1903c: 313) [= increpitus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Pecos Canyon (? San Miguel Co.), New Mexico, 25 June, M. Grabham
and T. D. A. Cockerell (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools].
Adults taken after sunset.
109. Aedes (O.) mutatus Dyar, 1919b: 24 [= increpitus]|. TYPE: Holotype
o with genitalia slide (663), Missoula (Missoula Co.), Montana, 6 July 1917,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 21918). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools].
110. Aedes (O.) hewitti Hearle, 1923:5 [= increpitus]|. TYPE: Holotype 9
(13042a), Yale, British Columbia, 8 Aug 1920, E. Hearle (CNC, 521). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by floodwaters, rain and melted snow].
111. Aedes (O.) infirmatus Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 197. TYPE: Syntypes lar-
vae, Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana, J. W. Dupree (NE).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary ground pools, particularly edges of mar-
shes, after summer rains].
112. Aedes (O.) intrudens Dyar, 1919b: 23. TYPE: Lectotype o with geni-
talia slide (467), White River (Algoma Co.), Ontario, 25 June 1907, F. Knab
(USNM, 21823;-selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
in woodland pools, open bogs and marshes, particularly in water from melting
snow]. Males taken by beating bushes.
113. Aedes (O.) melanimon Dyar, 1924b:126. TYPE: Lectotype & with
genitalia slide (1955), Bakersfield (Kern Co.), California, 26 Feb 1924,
C. K. Badger (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 221). BIONOMICS:
[''Larvae in temporary pools when filled by the very occasional rains of the re-
gion, '' Dyar 1928: 202].
114. Aedes (O.) klotsi Matheson, 1933: 69 [= melanimon]. TYPE: Holo-
type & with genitalia slide, Mountain Home Lake, Fort Garland (Costilla
Co.), Colorado, elev. 8300 ft, 20-25 July 1932, A. B. and Elsie B. Klots
(USNM, 49241). BIONOMICS: Larvae along edge of small, cold, clear moun-
tain stream. Adults abundant in tall grass of meadow near lake.
115. Aedes (O.) mitchellae (Dyar, 1905a: 74). TYPE: Holotype 9, Jack-
sonville (Duvale Co.), Florida, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 8402, not 8407 as stated
in original description, see Stone and Knight 1956a: 222). BIONOMICS: Lar-
vae in temporary pools of fresh water.
116. Aedes (O.) monticola Belkin & McDonald, 1957: 179. TYPE: Holo-
- type & (UCLA 173-104) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia
slide, Madera Canyon (Santa Cruz Co.), Arizona, elev. ca. 5000 ft, 18 Aug
1955, W. A. McDonald (USNM, 63244). BIONOMICS: Larvae in rothole in
dead, fallen sycamore.
117. Aedes (O.) iridipennis Dyar, 1922b: 92 [= muelleri]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, head of Indian Creek, south base of Cochise Head, Chiricahua Moun-
- tains (Cochise Co.), Arizona, elev. 6100 ft, 17 Aug 1917, C. H. T. Townsend
(USNM, 25264). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes]. Female taken biting in
cave by day.
118. Aedes (O.) nigripes (Zetterstedt, 1838: 807). TYPE: o, Q,
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
Greenland (LS; see Natvig 1954: 86-92). BIONOMICS: | Larvae in pools formed
by melting ice and snow].
119. Aedes (O.) innuitus Dyar & Knab, 1918a: 166 [= nigripes]. TYPE:
Lectotype “ with genitalia slide (708), Kangerdlooksoah [Kangerdlugssuak, 7 7
23'N 67° 01'W], Inglefield Gulf, Greenland, 6 Aug 1908, C. C. Craft (USNM,
21561; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 219; the type locality and collector
may not be correct and may refer only to 2 additional females seen by Dyar and
Knab, in that case the citation should be Greenland, F. Meinert). BIONOMICS:
[As for nigripes].
120. Aedes (O.) nigromaculis (Ludlow, 1906c: 83). TYPE: Lectotype @,
Fort Keogh [near Miles City] (Custer Co.), Montana, Sept 1906 (USNM, 10147;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 222). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in al-
kaline waters in rain filled depressions and in irrigation ditches].
121. Aedes (O.) griseus (Ludlow, 1907: 130) [= nigromaculis]. TYPE:
Holotype 9, Boise Barracks (Ida Co.), Idaho, July (USNM). BIONOMICS: [As
for nigromaculis].
122. Aedes (O.) Wiptiadopels Dyar & Knab, 1918a: 166. TYPE: Lectotype °,
Salt Lake Co., Utah, 10 or 15 Apr 1914, C. T. Voorhies (USNM, 21560; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1956a: 222). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary snow
pools in spring].
123. Aedes (O.) pionips Dyar, 1919b: 19. TYPE: Lectotype & (994/B9)
with genitalia slide (994), White River (Algoma Co.), Ontario, 19 June 1918,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 21922; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIONOM-
ICS: Larvae in small mossy pools in spruce swamp. Males swarming at dusk
in openings between dwarf spruces in swamp.
*124. Aedes (O.) pullatus (Coquillett, 1904f: 168). TYPE: Lectotype o with
genitalia slide (21), Kaslo, NW shore of Kootenay Lake, Selkirk Mts, British
Columbia, elev. 1670 ft, emerged 12 June 1903, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 8030; se-
lection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 224; see Currie 1904: 26 for locality). BIO-
NOMICS: Larvae in pools formed by melting snow or the overflow of streams,
usually at high elevations.
125. Aedes (O.) acrophilus Dyar, 1917d: 127 [= pullatus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Lake Louise, Laggan, Alberta, 18 Aug 1906, H. G. Dyar and A. N.
Caudell (USNM, 21548). BIONOMICS: [As for pullatus].
126. Aedes (O.) pearyi Dyar & Shannon, 1925b: 78 [= pullatus]. TYPE:
Holotype 2, Hawk's Harbor, Labrador, [Newfoundland], 20 July 1908, Admiral
Peary's 1908 polar expedition (USNM, 27861). BIONOMICS: [As for pullatus).
127. Aedes (O.) punctodes Dyar, 1922a:1. TYPE: Lectotype o (1582), —
Unalakleet, Norton Sound, Alaska, 3-9 June 1921, S. Hadwen (USNM, 24954;
selection of Knight 1951: 97). BIONOMICS: Larvae from pools in tundra.
128. Aedes (O.) punctor (Kirby, 1837: 309). TYPE: Adult, Mackenzie
River valley, near Fort Norman, Northwest Territories, lat. 65 (LU). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in pools formed by melting snow].
129. Aedes (O.) implacabilis (Walker, 1848: '7)[= punctor]. TYPE: Holo-
type ¢ with legs all missing, St. Martin's Falls [St. Martin], Albany River,
Hudson's Bay, Ontario, G. Barnston (BM). BIONOMICS: [As for punctor].
130. Aedes (O.) provocans (Walker, 1848: 7) [= punctor|. TYPE: o with
Sire missing, 9, Nova Scotia, Lt. Redman (BM). BIONOMICS: [As for
unctor
131. Aedes (O.) auroides (Felt, 1905b: 449) [= punctor]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2? bred from larva, Elizabethtown (Essex Co.), New York, 12 May (NY).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in temporary pools formed by melting snow].
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 15
132. Aedes (O.) rempeli Vockeroth, 1954: 112. TYPE: Holotype o with
associated larval and pupal skins, Great Whale River, Quebec, 17 June 1949,
K. L. Knight and D. W. Jenkins (CNC, 6032). BIONOMICS: Bred from larva
in large, apparently permanent pool, about 45 ft x 30 ftx 18 in, the bottom
mostly bare rock with few clumps of grass; in association with Aedes commu-
nis, A. nigripes and A. impiger.
133. Aedes (O.) riparius Dyar & Knab, 1907b: 213. TYPE: Lectotype 3
Winnipeg, Manitoba, 21 June 1907, F. Knab (USNM, 10875; selection of Stone
and ee 1956a: 225). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in early spring pools on the prai-
ries].
134. Aedes (O.) schizopinax Dyar, 1929b: 1. TYPE: Holotype 0, Story
Creek railway crossing (Gallatin Co.), Montana, 6 Apr 1928, G. Allen Mail
(USNM, 41709). BIONOMICS: Larvae in overflow from permanent pool.
135. Aedes (O.) sierrensis (Ludlow, 1905a: 231). TYPE: Lectotype 9°,
Three Rivers, Sierra Nevada (Tulare Co.), California, E. J. Bingham
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 225). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
treeholes and occasionally in artificial containers].
136. Aedes (O.) sollicitans (Walker, 1856b: 427). TYPE: 2, United States
[Restricted to vicinity of Charleston (Charleston Co.), South Carolina] (BM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in salt or brackish marshes in coastal areas, in warm
weather].
137. Aedes (O.) spencerii (Theobald, 1901b: 99). TYPE: 492, Stony Mt.
and St. Boniface, Manitoba, July, W. I. Spencer (BM). BIONOMICS: [ Larvae
in temporary pools formed by melting snow or rain on prairie in early spring].
138. Aedes (O.) idahoensis (Theobald, 1903a: 250) [= ssp. of spencerii].
TYPE: Adults, Market Lake (Jefferson Co.), Idaho, J. M. Aldrich (BM). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae stated to be probably in an arm of Snake River near the
town (Aldrich in Theobald, 1903: 250)].
4139. Aedes (O.) squamiger (Coquillett, 1902g: 85). TYPE: Lectotype 9,
Stanford University (Santa Clara Co.), California, V. L. Kellogg (USNM, 6256;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 225). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in salt or
brackish pools in coastal marshes]. :
140. Aedes (O.) deniedmannii (Ludlow, 1904: 234) [= squamiger]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Benicia Barracks (Solano Co.), California, Mar, Apr or May,
W. F. de Niedmann (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 217). BIO-
NOMICS: [As for squamiger].
141. Aedes (O.) hirsuteron (Theobald, 1901b: 98) [= sticticus]|. TYPE: 2,
Woodstock (Shenandoah Co.), Virginia, June, F. C. Pratt (BM). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in temporary ground pools in spring]. 7
142. Aedes (O.) pretans (Grossbeck, 1904b: 332) [= sticticus]. TYPE:
Lectotype $, Great Piece Meadow [probably Chatham] (Morris Co.), New Jer-
sey, 27 Apr or 15 May, J. B. Smith (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight
1956a: 224). BIONOMICS: [As for hirsuteron].
143. Aedes (O.) aestivalis (Dyar, 1904b: 245) [= sticticus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype & (279.0) with genitalia slide (22), Kaslo, NW shore of Kootenay Lake,
Selkirk Mts., British Columbia, elev. 1670 ft, end of June-Aug 1903, H. G.
Dyar (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 213; see Currie 1904: 26
for locality). BIONOMICS: [As for hirsuteron].
144. Aedes (O.) aldrichi Dyar & Knab, 1908: 57 [= sticticus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype 9, Market Lake (Jefferson Co.), Idaho, J. M. Aldrich (USNM, 12010;
selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 213). BIONOMICS: [As for hirsuteron|].
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
145. Aedes (O.) gonimus Dyar & Knab, 1918a: 165 [= sticticus]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Kerrville (Kerr Co.), Texas, 20 June 1907, F. C. Pratt (USNM,
21559; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS: [Larvae as for
hirsuteron]. Adults in a deep canyon, bite fiercely.
146. Aedes (O.) vinnipegensis Dyar, 1919b:34 [= sticticus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Winnipeg Beach, Manitoba, 4-5 July 1918 (USNM, 21921). BIONOM-
ICS: [As for hirsuteron].
147. Aedes (O.) stimulans (Walker, 1848: 4). TYPE: 9, Nova Scotia, Lt.
Redman (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools in spring, formed by
eis snow, rain or overflow water from streams. Often found in woodland
pools}.
148. Aedes (O.) subcantans (Felt, 1905b: 474) [= stimulans]. TYPE: ’, ?,
larva, [probably Nassau (Rensselaer Co.)], New York, [May 1905, E. P.
Felt] (NY). BIONOMICS: Larvae in open grassy pools such as found along
roadside or in meadows in association with fitchii and trichurus.
149. Aedes (O.) mercurator Dyar, 1920a: 13 [= stimulans]. TYPE: Lec-
totype o with genitalia slide (1165), Dawson, Yukon Territory, 15 July 1919,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 22615; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 221). BIO-
NOMICS: [As for stimulans].
150. Aedes (O.) mississippii Dyar, 1920c: 113 [= stimulans]. TYPE: Lec-
totype with genitalia slide (1263), Electric Mills (Kemper Co.), Mississip-
pi, J. A. LePrince (USNM, 22884; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 221).
BIONOMICS: Larvae in tree stumps; [usually in temporary ground pools].
151. Aedes (O.) classicus Dyar, 1920c: 113 [= stimulans]. TYPE: Lec-
totype & on slide, Hudson Co., New Jersey, 20 May 1920, W. R. Bryce-De-
laney (USNM, 23111; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 216). _BIONOMICS:
Bred from freshwater pools near salt marsh.
152. Aedes (O.) albertae Dyar, 1920c: 115 [= stimulans]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o with genitalia slide (1226), Edmonton, Alberta, 17 May 1919, H. G.
Dyar (USNM, 22885; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 213). BIONOMICS:
[As for stimulans].
153. Aedes (O.) damnosus (Say, 1823: 11) [= taeniorhynchus]. TYPE:
Adult, Pennsylvania (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in brackish and freshwater
pools near coast].
154. Aedes (O.) thelcter Dyar, 1918c:129. TYPE: Holotype 2, Browns-
ville (Cameron Co.), Texas, 29 Aug 1916, M. M. High (USNM, 21718). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in overflow pools from irrigation ditches and in temporary
rainpools].
155. Aedes (O.) keyensis Buren, 1947: 228 [= thelcter]|. TYPE: Holotype
2, Naval Hospital, Key West (Monroe Co.), Florida, 15 Oct 1946, Eddie Fer-
nandez (A). BIONOMICS: [Larvae as for thelcter]. Females taken in light trap.
156. Aedes (O.) thibaulti Dyar & Knab, 1910: 174. TYPE: Lectotype &
with genitalia slide (524), Scott (Pulaski Co.), Arkansas, 27 Apr 1909, J. K.
Thibault (USNM, 12746; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 225). BIONOM-
ICS: [Larvae in flooded bases of sweetgum and tupelogum trees in areas sub-
ject to flooding].
157. Aedes (O.) tormentor Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 191. TYPE: Syntypes lar-
vae, Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana, J. W. Dupree (NE).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary pools after summer rains; rare].
158. Aedes (O.) trichurus (Dyar, 1904a: 170). TYPE: Syntypes larva,
egg, Kaslo, NW shore of Kootenay Lake, Selkirk Mts., British Columbia,
elev. 1670 ft, 25 June 1903, H. G. Dyar (NE; see Currie 1904: 26 for locality).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in early spring pools formed by snow and rain in north-
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 17
ern swamps]. 7
159. Aedes (O.) cinereoborealis (Felt & Young, 1904: 312) [= trichurus].
TYPE: Holotype adult, New York (NY). BIONOMICS: [As for trichurus].
160. Aedes (O.) pagetonotum Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 253 [= trichurus].
TYPE: Lectotype o with genitalia slide (343), Ottawa, Ontario, 15 May 1900,
J. Fletcher (USNM, 12057; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 223). BIO-
NOMICS: [As for trichurus].
161. Aedes (O.) poliochros Dyar, 1919b: 35 [= trichurus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Aweme, Manitoba, 3 June 1904, N. Criddle (USNM, 21924). BIONOM-
ICS: [As for trichurus].
*162. Aedes (O.) trivittatus (Coquillett, 1902f: 193). TYPE: Holotype ,
Chester (Morris Co.), New Jersey, 10 or 14 Sept, J. B. Smith (USNM, 6702).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary rainpools in meadows, swamps and wood-
lands during summer].
163. Aedes (O.) inconspicuus (Grossbeck, 1904b: 332) [= trivittatus].
TYPE: Lectotype 9, Garret Mt., Paterson (Passaic Co.), New Jersey, 5 Oct
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 219). BIONOMICS: [As for tri-
vittatus].
164. Aedes (O.) varipalpus (Coquillett, 1902b: 292). TYPE: Holotype @,
Williams (Coconino Co.), Arizona, 29 July, H. S. Barber (USNM, 6559). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes].
165. Aedes (O.) ventrovittis Dyar, 1916b: 84. TYPE: Holotype 2, Fallen
Leaf, Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.), California, 2 June 1916, H. G. Dyar
(USNM, 20355). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shallow, clear pools formed by
melting snow at elevations of about 6000 to 11,000 ft]. Female taken biting by
day under pines by meadow at north end of lake.
166. Aedes (O.) fisheri Dyar, 1917a: 19 [= ventrovittis]|. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2, Tahoe Tavern, at outlet of Lake Tahoe (Placer Co.), California, 20
June 1915, A. K. Fisher (USNM, 21042; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a:
217). BIONOMICS: [Larvae as for ventrovittis].
167. Aedes (Finlaya) atropalpus (Coquillett, 1902b: 292). TYPE: Lecto-
type ?, Plummer's Island (Montgomery Co.), Maryland, 16 July 1902, H. S.
Barber (USNM, 6558; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 215). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in overflow pools in rockholes along mountain streams and occasion-
ally in rain-filled rockholes away from streams].
168. Aedes (F.) hendersoni Cockerell, 1918: 199. TYPE: Lectotype 2,
Box Elder Creek, 19 mi W of Douglas (Converse Co.), Wyoming, 25 Aug
1917, Schwabe and Henderson (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a:
218). ‘ssa [Larvae in treeholes and occasionally in artificial con-
tainers}.
*169. Aedes (F.) triseriatus (Say, 1823: 12). TYPE: 9, Pennsylvania (NE).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in treeholes and occasionally in artificial containers].
170. Aedes (F.) niger (Ludlow, 1905b: 387) [= triseriatus]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, Rock Island Arsenal (Rock Island Co.), Illinois, 3 Aug 1905, G. G.
Craig (USNM). BIONOMICS: [As for triseriatus].
171. Aedes (F.) zoosophus Dyar & Knab, 1918a: 165. TYPE: Holotype 9,
Kerrville (Kerr Co.), Texas, 19 Aug 1909, F. C. Pratt (USNM, 21558). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in rot cavities of trees, particularly willows, and occasion-
ally in artificial containers],
172. Aedes (F.) alleni Turner, 1924: 84 [= zoosophus]. TYPE: Lecto-
type o (1885) with genitalia slide, Mission (Hidalgo Co.), Texas, 28 Dec 1923
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
(USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 214). BIONOMICS: Bred from lar-
vae in willow treehole.
173. Aedes (Stegomyia) taeniatus (Wiedemann, 1828: 10) [= aegypti].
TYPE: o, 2, Savannah (Chatam Co.), Georgia (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
artificial containers].
174. Aedes (S.) excitans (Walker, 1848: 4) [= aegypti]. TYPE: 9, Geor-
gia, Abbot (BM). BIONOMICS: [As for taeniatus].
*175. Aedes (Aedimorphus) sylvestris (Theobald, 1901la: 406); montcalmi
(Blanchard, 1905: 307), new name [= vexans]. TYPE: <, ?, Rondeau Provin-
cial Park (Kent Co.), Ontario; Lake Simcoe, Ontario; Stony Mt., Manitoba;
July and Sept, E. M. Walker (Ontario) and W. I. Spencer (Manitoba) (BM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in temporary rain or flood water pools and irrigation
seepages|.
176. Aedes (Aedimorphus) euochrus Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1917: 716
e vexans|]. TYPE: Holotype 9, Popcum, British Columbia, 2 Aug 1903, J.
Fletcher (USNM, 12057). BIONOMICS: [Larvae as for sylvestris].
177. Aedes (Aedes) fuscus Osten Sacken,1877: 191 FS cinereus]. TYPE:
o, 9, Cambridge (Middlesex Co.), Massachusetts, May, C. R. Osten Sacken
(MCZ). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in [temporary] pool.
178. Aedes (A.) pallidohirtus Grossbeck, 1905:359 [= cinereus]. TYPE:
Lectotype 2, Orange [Watchung] Mts. (Essex Co.), New Jersey, 26 May 1905,
Brehme (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 233). BIONOMICS: [ Lar-
vae ii woodland pools, unshaded temporary rain pools and occasionally mar-
shes}.
179. Aedes (A.) hemiteleus Dyar, 1924c: 179 [= cinereus]. TYPE: Lec-
totype °, Lake Center Camp (Plumas Co.), California, 1 June 1920, H. G.
Dyar (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1956a: 218). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in meadow pools formed by high water of lake. Adults taken in meadow on
grass and under willow.
180. Culiseta (C.) alaskaensis (Ludlow, 1906b: 326). TYPE: Lectotype
with genitalia slide (222), Fort Egbert, Eagle, [Yukon River], Alaska, 2 June
1906, J. R. Bosley (USNM, 9959; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in shallow pools, clogged with debris and vegetation].
181. Culiseta (C.) impatiens (Walker, 1848: 5). TYPE: 0, 9, St. Mar-
tin's Falls [St. Martin], Albany River, Hudson's Bay, Ontario, G. Barnston
(BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent pools, usually with cold, clear
water |. eee
182. Culiseta (C.) pinguis (Walker, 1866: 337) [= impatiens]. TYPE: 9,
[Fraser River], British Columbia, J. K. Lord(? BM). BIONOMICS: [As for
impatiens].
*183. Culiseta (C.) absobrina (Felt, 1904: 318) [= impatiens]. TYPE: ¢,
?, larva, Elizabethtown (Essex Co.), New York, July-Aug (NY). BIONOM-
ICS: Larvae in cold mountain pool. 3
184. Culiseta (C.) incidens (Thomson, 1869: 443). TYPE: 2, California
(LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in wide variety of permanent and semiperma-
nent aquatic habitats, including running, stagnant, fresh and brackish water.
Some preference for clear or semiclear water in at least partial shade].
185. Culiseta (C.) inornata (Williston, 1893d: 253). TYPE: Holotype 9,
Argus Mts (Inyo Co.), California, Apr 1891, A. Koebele (USNM). BIONOM-
ICS: [Larvae in more or less permanent ground pools and ditches, often with
foul water |.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 19
©, larva, Sodus Point (Wayne Co.), New York, 25 Aug (NY). BIONOMICS: Bred
from larvae in shaded pool.
187. Culiseta (C.) particeps (Adams, 1903a: 26). TYPE: Lectotype ?, Oak
- Creek Canyon (Coconino Co.), Arizona, elev. 6000 ft, F. H. Snow (USNM; se-
lection of Stone 1958: 237). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in cool, rather clear, shaded
pools in stream beds, often with algae and other vegetation].
188. Culiseta (C.) maccrackenae Dyar & Knab, 1906a: 133 [= particeps].
TYPE: Lectotype ? (30-3) with genitalia slide (221), Stanford University (San-
ta Clara Co.), California,23 June 1903, I. MacCracken (USNM, 9961; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196). BIONOMICS: [As for particeps].
189. Culiseta (Culicella) minnesotae Barr, 1957: 163. TYPE: Holotype 9°,
Olcott Park, near greenhouse, Virginia (St. Louis Co.), Minnesota, 4 May
1953, A. R. Barr (USNM, 62409). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in semiper-
manent marshes].
*190. Culiseta (Culicella) dyari (Coquillett, 1902f: 192) [= morsitans].
TYPE: Lectotype o’, Center Harbor (Belknap Co.), New Hampshire, H.G. Dyar
(USNM, 6700; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in rather large temporary cold pools in semipermanent marshes].
191. Culiseta (Culicella) brittoni (Felt, 1905a: 79) [= morsitans]|. TYPE:
Holotype , Branford (New Haven Co.), Connecticut, 27 June 1904, H. L. Vie-
reck (NY). BIONOMICS: [As for dyaril.
192. Culiseta (Culicella) parodites (Dyar, 1928b: 244). TYPE: Lectotype
o with genitalia slide (735), Saxeville (Waushara Co.), Wisconsin, 23 June
1909, B. K. Miller (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in cold pools in semipermanent marshes].
*193. Culiseta (Climacura) melanura (Coquillett, 1902f: 193). TYPE: Lec-
totype o’ (20) with genitalia slide, Center Harbor (Belknap Co.), New Hamp-
shire, H. G. Dyar (USNM, 6701; selection of Stone and Knight 1957c: 196).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae primarily in pools in wooded permanent or semiperma-
nent marshes].
194. Culex (Neoculex) apicalis Adams, 1903a: 26. TYPE: Lectotype ¢
lacking most of proboscis, both wings, both hindlegs, both midtibiae and one
foretarsus, Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino Co.), Arizona, elev. 6000 ft, Aug,
F. H. Snow (USNM; selection of Stone 1958: 236). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in
canyon streams and woodland pools].
195. Culex (N.) arizonensis Bohart, 1949: 341. TYPE: Holotype “, 8 mi
SE of Prescott (Yavapai Co.), Arizona, 25 Aug 1947, R. M. Bohart (USNM,
58662). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in shaded creekbed pool.
196: Culex (N.) reevesi Bohart, 1949: 342; boharti Brookman & Reeves,
1950: 159, new name. TYPE: Holotype c, 1 miS of Monticello (Napa Co.),
California, 8 Oct 1947, R. M. Bohart (USNM, 58663). BIONOMICS: Bred
from larvae in shaded creekbed pool.
197. Culex (N.) reevesi Wirth, 1948: 230. TYPE: Adult, larva, Califor-
nia coast from Point Reyes to San Diego (LU). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in ponds].
*198. Culex (N.) territans Walker, 1856b: 428. TYPE: 9, United States
[Restricted to vicinity of Charleston (Charleston Co.), South Carolina] (NE).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in semipermanent and permanent pools in streams, and
in swamps and ponds].
199. Culex (N.) saxatilis Grossbeck, 1905: 360 [= territans]|. TYPE: Lec-
totype ?, Garret Mt., Paterson (Passaic Co.), New Jersey, 31 Aug (USNM;
186. Culiseta(C.) magnipennis (Felt, 1904: 322) [= inornata]. TYPE: ¢,
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: Larvae in rock-bot-
tomed pool, associated with C. pipiens.
200. Culex (N.)frickii Ludlow, 1906a: 132 [= territans]. TYPE: Holo-
type ?, Fort Snelling, St. Paul (Ramsey Co.), Minnesota, 1 Oct, E. B. Frick
(USNM). BIONOMICS: [As for territans].
201. Culex (C.) erythrothorax Dyar, 1907: 124. TYPE: Holotype 9,
Nigger Slough [Gardena] (Los Angeles Co.), California, 30 May or 6 June 1906,
H. G. Dyar and A. N. Caudell (USNM, 10009). BIONOMICS: Larvae in per-
manent sloughs containing reeds, Lemna and fish.
202. Culex (C.) badgeri Dyar, 1924b: 125 [= erythrothorax]. TYPE: Lec-
totype & (34A) with genitalia slide (1945), Bakersfield (Kern Co.), California,
29 Jan 1924, C. K. Badger (USNM; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 43).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae in large shallow ponds containing heavy growths of veg-
etation]. Adults taken in "timber, between catch basin and river."
203. Culex (C.) affinis Adams, 1903a: 25; peus Speiser, 1904a: 148, new
name. TYPE: Holotype ? with 2 legs missing, Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino
Co.), Arizona, elev. 6000 ft, Aug, F. H. Snow (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae
in all types of permanent or semipermanent ground waters, often polluted].
*204. Culex (C.) stigmatosoma Dyar, 1907: 123 [= peus]. TYPE: Holo-
type ¢ (C 787), Pasadena (Los Angeles Co.), California, 20 May 1906, H. G.
Dyar and A. N. Caudell (USNM, 1008). BIONOMICS: Larva in cement-lined
pool.
205. Culex (C.) consobrinus Robineau-Desvoidy, 1827: 408 [= pipiens].
TYPE: Adult, Pennsylvania (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in large artificial
containers, contaminated pools and ditches; domestic].
206. Culex (C.) dipseticus Dyar & Knab, 1909c: 34 [= pipiens pallens].
TYPE: o; Coachella and Indio (Riverside Co.), California, 9 and 10 June
1906, A. N. Caudell; also Salina Cruz (Oaxaca), Acapulco (Guerrero) and La
Paz (Baja California Sur), Mexico (USNM; not cited in Stone and Knight
1957a). BIONOMICS: [As for quinquefasciatus].
207. Culex (C.) comitatus Dyar & Knab, 1909c: 35 [= pipiens pallens].
TYPE: Lectotype o with genitalia slide (374), National City (San Diego), Ca-
lifornia, 2-3 June 1906, H. G. Dyar and A. N. Caudell (USNM, 12201; selec-
tion of Stone and Knight 1957a: 46). BIONOMICS: [As for quinquefasciatus].
208. Culex (C.) quinquefasciatus Say, 1823: 10 [= ssp. of pipiens].
TYPE: Adult, Mississippi River [Restricted to vicinity of New Orleans (Or-
leans Par.), Louisiana] (NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in large artificial con-
tainers, contaminated pools].
209. Culex (C.) pungens Wiedemann, 1828:9 [= pipiens quinquefasciatus].
TYPE: ¢, New Orleans (Orleans Par.), Louisiana (NMW). BIONOMICS: [As
for quinquefasciatus].
: 210. Culex (C.) ferruginosus (Wiedemann, 1828: 12) [= pipiens quinque-
fasciatus]. TYPE: 2, New Orleans (Orleans Par.), Louisiana (NMW). BIO-
NOMICS: [As for quinquefasciatus].
211. Culex (C.) restuans Theobald, 1901b: 142. TYPE: Holotype ?, To-
ronto, Ontario, June, E. M. Walker (BM). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in ground
pools, treeholes and artificial containers]. Female taken on a window pane.
212. Culex (C.) brehmei Knab, 1916a: 161 [= restuans]. TYPE: Lecto-
type 2, Newark (Essex Co.), New Jersey, 12 June 1916, H. H. Brehme
(USNM, 20411; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 45). BIONOMICS: Larvae
in cold (38°F) spring in woods.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 21
213. Culex (C.) salinarius Coquillett, 1904b: 73. TYPE: Lectotype ¢,
Elizabeth (Union Co.), New Jersey, 30 Aug 1902, J. B. Smith (USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in salt marsh.
214. Culex (C.) tarsalis Coquillett, 1896a: 43. TYPE: Lectotype o, Ar-
gus Mts. (Inyo Co.), California, Apr 1891, A. Koebele (USNM, 904; selection
of Stone and Knight 1957a: 56). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in springs].
215. Culex (C.) willistoni Giles, 1900: 281 [= tarsalis]. TYPE: Holo-
type 2, mee Mts. (Inyo Co.), California, Apr (LU). BIONOMICS: [As for
tarsalis}.
216. Culex (C.) kelloggii Theobald, 1903b: 211 [= tarsalis]. TYPE: 4¢,
5 2, Stanford University (Santa Clara Co.), California, Sept-Oct, Kellogg (BM).
BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in ponds, ornamental or stream-bed pools].
217. Culex (C.) thriambus Dyar, 1921a: 33, TYPE: Lectotype & (Y6/
1356) with genitalia slide (1356), Kerrville (Kerr Co.), Texas, 20 Aug 1920,
H. G. Dyar (USNM, 23926; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 57). BIONOM-
ICS: Larvae in dirty pool beside river.
218. Culex (Melanoconion) abominator Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 257. TYPE:
Lectotype o, Plano (Collin Co.), Texas, Sept, E. S. Tucker (USNM, 12103; se-
lection of King and Bradley 1937: 353). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in permanent
pools with vegetation]. |
*219. Culex (Mel.) anips Dyar, 1916a: 48. TYPE: Lectotype & with gen-
italia slide (747), San Diego (San Diego Co.), California, spring 1916, H. G.
Dyar (USNM, 20304; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 43). BIONOMICS:
Pupae found rarely in permanent pool, about 50 x 300 ft, with deep water, cat-
tails and Lemna, fish, and Red-winged Blackbirds.
220. Culex (Mel.) erraticus (Dyar & Knab, 1906c: 224). TYPE: Lecto-
type larval skin closest to label on slide with two other larval skins, Baton
Rouge (East Baton Rouge Par.), Louisiana, J. W. Dupree (USNM; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957a: 49). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in grassy shallow margins
of ponds, lakes, marshes and streams].
221. Culex (Mel.) egberti Dyar & Knab, 1907b: 214 [= erraticus]. TYPE:
Lectotype ?, Warner's Camp, north shore of Lake Okeechobee (Okeechobee
Co.), Florida, Mar 1906, J. H. Egbert (USNM, 10876; selection of Stone and
Knight 1957a: 48). BIONOMICS: [As for erraticus].
222. Culex (Mel.) peribleptus Dyar & Knab, 1918b: 181 [= erraticus].
TYPE: Lectotype o on slide, Parr Shoals (Fairfield Co.), South Carolina, 18
Aug 1915, T. H. D. Griffiths (USNM, 21571; selection of Stone and Knight
1957a: 54). BIONOMICS: Larvae in "grass pond."
223. Culex (Mel.) pose Dyar & Knab, 1918b: 182 [= erraticus]. TYPE:
Holotype ?, Dallas (Dallas Co.), Texas, 11 Nov 1905, W. E. Hinds (USNM,
21572). BIONOMICS: [As for erraticus].
224. Culex (Mel.) degustator Dyar, 1921b: 39 [= erraticus|]. TYPE: Lec-
totype & with genitalia slide (1333), Scott (Pulaski Co.), Arkansas, 11 Aug
1909, J. K. Thibault (USNM, 23833; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 47).
BIONOMICS: [As for erraticus].
225. Culex (Mel.) homoepas Dyar & Ludlow, 1921: 46 [= erraticus].
TYPE: Holotype , Jackson Barracks, New Orleans (Orleans Par. ), Louisi-
ana, 16 Oct 1920, C. C. Robbins (USNM, 23942). BIONOMICS: [As for er-
raticus]|.
226. Culex (Mel.) mulrennani Basham, 1948:1. TYPE: Holotype * with
associated larval and pupal skins, Big Pine Key (Monroe Co.), Florida, 26
July 1947, D. C. Thurman and E. Basham (USNM). BIONOMICS: Bred from
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
larvae in 3 holes in limestone, one with, and 2 without vegetation, from 1-8 it
deep and 6-18 in in diameter.
227. Culex (Mel.) peccator Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 256. TYPE: Lectotype
with genitalia slide (396), Scott [Pulaski Co. not Lonoke Co.], Arkansas, 30
Sept-8 Oct 1908, J. K. Thibault (USNM, 12192; selection of Rozeboom and
Komp 1950: 94). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools in streams and in marshy
areas|. Adults in treeholes and holes in bank of bayou.
228. Culex (Mel.) incriminator Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 257 [= peccator].
TYPE: Lectotype & with genitalia slide (407), Agricultural College (Oktibbeha
Co.), Mississippi, 18 Aug 1905, W. V. Reed (USNM, 12105; selection of
Stone and Knight 1957a: 51). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in pools in streams and
in marshy areas].
229. Culex (Mochlostyrax) floridanus (Dyar & Knab, 1906b: 171) [= pi-
losus]. TYPE: Larvae, Estero (Lee Co.), Florida, July 1906, J. B. Van Du-
zee (NE). BIONOMICS: Larvae on top of algae at. side wall inside of large
stone tank with fish.
230. Culex (Mochl.) deceptor Dyar & Knab, 1909b: 257 [= pilosus]. TYPE:
Lectotype o with genitalia slide (346), Fort White (Columbia Co.), Florida,
H. Byrd (USNM, 12104; selection of Stone and Knight 1957a: 47). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in permanent and semipermanent ground pools].
231. Deinocerites mathesoni Belkin & Hogue, 1959: 426. TYPE: Holotype
o (46, 261), Brownsville (Cameron Co.), Texas, 8-9 Feb 1940, F. W. Fisk
(USNM). BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in fiddler crab (Uca pugilator) holes.
Chaoborinae
232. Chaoborus americanus (Johannsen, 1903b: 395). TYPE: Holotype &
(1027-718), Lake Forest (Lake Co.), Illinois, 1900 (Cornell). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in small semipermanent or permanent ponds throughout the year |.
233. Chaoborus hudsoni (Felt, 1904: 371) [= americanus]. TYPE: c, 9,
Poughkeepsie (Dutchess Co.), New York, June-Aug 1904 (NY). BIONOMICS:
[As for americanus]. Bred from larvae.
234. Chaoborus borealis Cook, 1956b: 25. TYPE: Holotype 0’, Whitehorse,
Yukon Territory, 18 May 1949, L. C. Curtis (CNC). BIONOMICS: | Larvae
probably in small, semipermanent or permanent bodies of water].
235. Chaoborus albipes (Johannsen, 1903b: 398) [= flavicans]. TYPE: Holo-
type °, Ithaca (Tompkins Co.), New York, Aug 1901 (Cornell). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in water-filled road ruts, temporary ponds and small pools].
236. Chaoborus rotundifolia (Felt, 1904: 366) [= flavicans]. TYPE: Holo-
type o’, Karner (Albany Co.), New York, 7 July 1904 (NY). BIONOMICS: Bred
from larva in woodland pool.
237. Chaoborus eluthera Dyar & Shannon, 1924c: 211 [= flavicans]. TYPE:
Lectotype o with genitalia slide, Potlatch (Latah Co.), Idaho, 20 June 1908,
J. M. Aldrich (USNM, 27457; PRESENT SELECTION by Alan Stone). BIO-
NOMICS: [Probably as for albipes]. ,
238. Sayomyia albata (Johnson, 1921a: 11). TYPE: Holotype o, Brookline
(Norfolk Co.), Massachusetts, 18 June 1907, C. W. Johnson (? MCZ). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae probably in permanent, semipermanent or temporary bodies
of ground water].
239. Sayomyia annulata (Cook, 1956b: 39). TYPE: Holotype ¢, Crystal
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 23
River (Citrus Co.), Florida, 18 Sept 1950, Hudson (USNM). BIONOMICS: [Lar-
vae probably in ponds, lakes or temporary ground pools]. Adults taken in
light trap.
240. Sayomyia astictopus (Dyar & Shannon, 1924c: 214). TYPE: Holotype ,
East Lake (Tulare Co.), California, 21 June 1883, Turner (USNM, 27458). BI-
ONOMICS: [Larvae in lakes, ponds and temporary ground pools].
241. Sayomyia lacustris (Freeborn, 1926:161) [= astictopus]. TYPE: Holo-
type o (1873), Lakeport (Lake Co.), California, 19 July 1925 (CAS). BIO-
NOMICS: [Larvae in lakes, ponds and temporary ground pools].
242. Sayomyia maculipes (Stone, 1965: 231). TYPE: Holotype ¢, Hot
Springs National Park (Garland Co.), Arkansas, 29 Sept 1963, B. C. Marshall
(USNM, 67424). BIONOMICS: [Larvae probably in lakes, ponds or other
ground pools].
*243. Sayomyia punctipennis (Say, 1823: 16). TYPE: Adult, Pennsylvania
(NE). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in lakes and ponds].
244. Sayomyia appendiculata (Herrick, 1884: 11) [= punctipennis]. TYPE:
Larva, pupa, Lake of the Isles, Minneapolis (Hennepin Co.), Minnesota (LU).
BIONOMICS: Larvae taken from lake at night.
*245. Schadonophasma trivittata (Loew, 1862b: 186) [= nyblaei]. TYPE: ¢,
Maine, Osten Sacken (MCZ). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in lakes, ponds and other
still ground waters].
246. Schadonophasma knabi (Dyar, 1905b: 16) [= nyblaei]. TYPE: Holo-
type larva (96), Springfield (Hampden Co.), Massachusetts, F. Knab (USNM).
BIONOMICS: [As for trivittata]. |
247. Mochlonyx cinctipes (Coquillett, 1903c:190). TYPE: Holotype , Mt.
Vernon (Fairfax Co.), Virginia, Apr 1903, W. V. Warner (USNM, 6839; only
specimen marked as type by Coquillett, fide Stone in litt.). BIONOMICS:
[Larvae in semipermanent or temporary ponds and pools in early spring].
248. Mochlonyx obscurus (Dyar & Shannon, 1924c: 208) [= cinctipes].
TYPE: Lectotype “ with genitalia slide, Hoodsport (Mason Co.), Washington,
4 May 1924, H.G. Dyar (USNM, 27456; PRESENT SELECTION by Alan Stone,
one of 2 specimens bearing type labels). BIONOMICS: Reared from larvae in
large lake which goes dry in summer. Larvae among logs in shallow water
near one end of lake, associated with Aedes cinereus.
249. Mochlonyx fuliginosus (Felt, 1905b: 458). TYPE: Holotype , Nassau
(Rensselaer Co.), New York, 14 May 1902 (NY). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in semi-
permanent or temporary ponds and pools early in the spring].
250. Mochlonyx karnerensis (Felt, 1904: 347) [= velutinus]. TYPE: Holo-
type o", Karner (Albany Co.), New York, 14 May 1902 (NY). BIONOMICS: Breu
from 2 larvae in stagnant pool. |
251. Mochlonyx lintneri (Felt, 1904: 353) [= velutinus]. TYPE: o, ?, near
Elizabethtown (Essex Co.), New York, 9 June 1904 (NY). BIONOMICS: Bred
from larvae in cool mountain pool, associated with species of Aedes and Eu-
corethra underwoodi.
*252. Eucorethra underwoodi Underwood, 1903: 182. TYPE:<, 2, Penob-
scot Co., Maine, 27 Jan 1903 (and a few days later), W. L. Underwood (LU).
BIONOMICS: Bred from larvae in 2 springs in wood, 8 mi apart, one with and
one without covering of ice; second spring was about 2 ft deep and 42°F at bot-
tom.
*253. Eucorethra americana (Johannsen, 1903b: 403) [= underwoodil.
TYPE: o, 2, larva, pupa, New York State, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey
(NY). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in small permanent or semipermanent, shaded
bodies of water such as springs, pools and wells].
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
*254. Corethrella brakeleyi (Coquiliett, 1902c: 85). TYPE: Holotype , ab-
domen missing, Lahaway (Ocean Co.), New Jersey, 13 Aug, J.T. Brakeley
and J. B. Smith (USNM, 6086; only specimen marked as type by Coquillett, fide
Stone in litt, 1966). BIONOMICS: [Larvae in still ground waters, usually with
dense vegetation].
255. Lutzomiops kerrvillensis Stone, 1965: 231. TYPE: Holotype °,
Kerrville (Kerr Co.), Texas, May 1954, L. J. Bottimer (USNM, 67423). BIO-
serene [Larvae probably in swamps or marginal vegetation of lakes and
ponds}.
LIST OF LOCALITIES
Canada
ALBERTA
Banff: 90. Aedes (O.) sansoni.
Edmonton: 152. Aedes (O.) albertae.
Laggan, Lake Louise: 125. Aedes (O.) acrophilus.
BRITISH COLUMBIA
Discovery Island, elev. ca. 100 ft: 71. Aedes (O.) pacificensis.
Fraser River: 182. Culiseta (C.) pinguis.
Kaslo, NW shore of Kootenay Lake, elev. 1670 ft: 124. Aedes (O.) pulla-
tus; 143. Aedes (O.) aestivalis; 158. Aedes (O.) trichurus.
Popcum: 176. Aedes (Aedim.) euochrus.
Prince Rupert: 101. Aedes (O.) cyclocerculus; 102. Aedes (O.) leucono-
tips
Yale: 110. Aedes (O.) hewitti.
MANITOBA
Aweme: 161. Aedes (O.) poliochros.
St. Boniface: 137. Aedes (O.) spencerii (also Stony Mt.).
Stony Mt.: 137. Aedes (O.) spencerii (also St. Boniface); 175. Aedes
(Aedim.) sylvestris (also Rondeau Provincial Pk. and Simcoe Lake, Ont. y.
Winnipeg: 133. Aedes (O.) riparius; 146. Aedes (O.) vinnipegensis (Winni- —
peg Beach). ?
NEW FOUNDLAND
Hawk's Harbor, Labrador: 103. Aedes (O.) labradorensis; 126. Aedes (O.)
pearyi.
NORTHWEST TERRITORIES
Bernard Harbour: 105. Aedes (O.) nearcticus.
Fort Norman (near), Mackenzie River valley, lat. 65°: 128. Aedes (O.)
punctor.
NOVA SCOTIA
Locality not specified: 87. Aedes (O.) excrucians; 130. Aedes (O.) provo-
cans; 147. Aedes (O.) stimulans.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 25
ONTARIO |
Ottawa: 160. Aedes (O.) pagetonotum.
Rondeau Provincial Park (Kent Co.): 175. Aedes (Aedim.) sylvestris (al-
so Simcoe Lake, Ont. and Stony Mt., Manitoba).
St. Martin[as St. Martin's Falls], Albany River, Hudson's Bay: 104. Ae-
des (O.) impiger; 129. Aedes (O.) implacabilis; 181. Culiseta (C.) impatiens.
Simcoe Lake (Simcoe Co.): 16. Anopheles (A.) walkeri; 65. Aedes (O.) ca-
nadensis (De Grassi Pt.); 175. Aedes (Aedim.) sylvestris (also Rondeau Pro-
vincial Park, Ont. and Stony Mt., Manitoba).
Toronto: 211. Culex (C.) restuans.
Trenton (Hastings Co.): 91. Aedes (O.) euedes.
White River (Algoma Co.): 54. Aedes (O.) centrotus; 78. Aedes (O.) dec-
ticus; 112. Aedes (O.) intrudens; 123. Aedes (O.) pionips.
QUEBEC
Great Whale River: 132. Aedes (O.) rempeli.
Rupert House: 106. Aedes (O.) implicatus.
SASKATCHEWAN
Carnduff, Assiniboia: 96. Aedes (O.) fletcheri.
Oxbow: 63. Aedes (O.) campestris.
YUKON TERRITORY
Dawson: 149. Aedes (O.) mercurator.
Whitehorse: 64. Aedes (O.) callithotrys; 234. Chaoborus borealis.
Greenland
Kangerdlugssuak, 77°923'N 67901'W, Inglefield Gulf: 119. Aedes (O.) innui-
tus (may be also Locality not specified).
Locality not specified: 118. Aedes (O.) nigripes.
United States
ALASKA
Anchorage: 77. Aedes (O.) prolixus.
Fort Egbert, Eagle (Yukon River): 180. Culiseta (C.) alaskaensis.
Fort Gibbon: 73. Aedes (O.) borealis.
Unalakleet, Norton Sound: 127. Aedes (O.) punctodes.
ARIZONA
Chiricahua Mts., head of Indian Creek, south base of Cochise Head, elev.
6100 ft (Cochise Co.): 117. Aedes (O.) iridipennis.
Madera Canyon, elev. ca. 5000 ft (Santa Cruz Co.): 116. Aedes (O.) mon-
ticola.
Oak Creek Canyon, elev. 6000 ft (Coconino Co.): 187. Culiseta (C.) par-
ticeps; 194. Culex (N.) apicalis; 203. Culex (C.) affinis.
Prescott, 8 mi SE of (Yavapai Co.): 195. Culex (N.) arizonensis.
Williams (Coconino Co.): 164. Aedes (O.) varipalpus.
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
ARKANSAS
Fayetteville (Washington Co.): 46. Psorophora (J.) longipalpis.
Hot Springs National Park (Garland Co.): 242. Sayomyia maculipes.
Scott (Pulaski Co.): 156. Aedes (O.) thibaulti; 224. Culex (Mel. ) degusta-
tor; 227. Culex (Mel. ) peccator.
CALIFORNIA
Arden (Alameda Co.): 83. Aedes (O.) lativittatus.
Argus Mts. (Inyo Co.): 185. Culiseta (C.) inornata; 214. Culex (C.) tarsa-
lis; 215. Culex (C.) willistoni.
Bakersfield (Kern Co.): 113. Aedes (O.) melanimon; 202. Culex (C.) bad-
seri. OS atest iio che ae
Benicia Barracks (Solano Co.): 140. Aedes (O.) deniedmannii.
Central California (county not specified): 11. Anopheles (A.) boydi.
Coachella (Riverside Co.): 206. Culex (C.) dipseticus (also Indio).
Davis (Yolo Co.): 6. Anopheles (A.) freeborni.
East Lake (Tulare Co.): 240. Sayomyia astictopus.
Elkhorn Ferry, near Sacramento (Yolo Co.): 33. Orthopodomyia califor-
nica.
Fallen Leaf, south end of Lake Tahoe (El Dorado Co.): 69. Aedes (O.) ca-
taphylla; 74. Aedes (O.) tahoensis; 93. Aedes (O.) palustris; 94. Aedes (O.)
pricei; 100. Aedes (O.) hexodontus; 107. Aedes (O.) increpitus; 165. Aedes
(O.) ventrovittis.
- Gardena, Nigger Slough (Los Angeles Co.): 201. Culex (C.) erythrothorax.
Indio (Riverside Co.): 206. Culex (C.) dipseticus (also Coachella).
Kelseyville (near), Township 13N, Range 9W, Sections 11 and 12, elev.
1390 ft (Lake Co.): 60. Aedes (O.) bicristatus.
Lake Center Camp (Plumas Co.): 179. Aedes (A. ) hemiteleus.
Lakeport (Lake Co.): 241. Sayomyia lacustris.
Locality not specified: 84. Aedes (O.) quaylei; 184. Culiseta (C.) incidens.
See also Point Reyes to San Diego.
Monticello, 1 miS (Napa Co.): 196. Culex (N.) reevesi Bohart.
- National City (San Diego Co.): 207. Culex (C.) comitatus.
Pasadena (Los Angeles Co.): 204. Culex (C.) stigmatosoma.
Point Reyes to San Diego, coast; locality not specified: 197. Culex (N.)
reevesi Wirth. |
San Diego (San Diego Co.): 219. Culex (Mel.) anips. See also Sweetwater
Junction.
Stanford Univ. (Santa Clara Co.): 8. Anopheles (A.) occidentalis; 10. Ano-
pheles (A.) franciscanus; 139. Aedes (O.) squamiger; 188. Culiseta (C.) mac-
crackenae; 216. Culex (C.) kelloggii.
Sweetwater Junction, near San Diego (San Diego Co.): 27. Uranotaenia an-
hydor. .
Tahoe Tavern, at outlet of Lake Tahoe (Placer Co.): 166. Aedes (O.) fi-
sheri. Co
Three Rivers (Tulare Co.): 135. Aedes (O.) sierrensis.
COLORADO
Mountain Home Lake, Fort Garland, elev. 8300 ft (Costilla Co.): 114. Ae-
des (O. ) klotsi.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes : 27
CONNECTICUT
Branford (New Haven Co.): 191. Culiseta (Culicella) brittoni.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Washington: 30. Uranotaenia sapphirina (also Brooklyn, New York); 34.
Orthopodomyia signifera.
FLORIDA :
Alligator Creek (probably Seminole Co.): 48. Psorophora (G.) floridensis.
Big Pine Key (Monroe Co.): 226. Culex-(Mel. ) mulrennani.
Brevard Co., near St. John's River: 3. Anopheles (A. ) bradleyi.
Crystal River (Citrus Co.): 239. Sayomyia annulata.
Estero (Lee Co.): 21. Wyeomyia (W.) antoinetta; 23. Wyeomyia (W.) van-
duzeei; 229. Culex (Mochl.) floridanus.
Florida Keys (Monroe Co.): 1. Anopheles (A.) atropos. See also Big Pine
and Key West.
Fort White (Columbia Co.): 230. Culex (Mochl.) deceptor.
Georgiana (Brevard Co.): 17. Toxorhynchites (L.) rutilus.
Jacksonville (Duvale Co.): 115. Aedes (O.) mitchellae.
Key West (Monroe Co.): 51. Psorophora (G.) nana; 155. Aedes (O.) keyen-
sis (Naval Hospital).
Kissimmee (Osceola Co.): 67. Aedes (O.) mathesoni.
Lake Okeechobee (north shore), Warner's Camp (Okeechobee Co.): 221.
Culex (Mel. ) egberti.
oe (Seminole Co.): 57. Aedes (O.) atlanticus (also New Brunswick,
Ned. ):
GEORGIA
Locality not specified: 36. Psorophora (P.) molesta; 174. Aedes (Steg. )
excitans.
Quitman, vicinity of (Brooks Co.): 7. Anopheles (A.) georgianus.
Savannah (Chatam Co.): 173. Aedes (Steg. ; taeniatus.
IDAHO
Boise (Ada Co.): 81. Aedes (O.) curriei; 121. Aedes (O.) griseus (Boise
Barracks).
Market Lake (Jefferson Co.): 188. Aedes (O.) idahoensis; 144. Aedes (O.)
aldrichi.
Potlatch (Latah Co.): 237. Chaoborus eluthera.
ILLINOIS
Lake Forest (Lake Co.): 232. Chaoborus americanus.
Locality not specified: 253. Eucorethra americana (also Locality not spe-
cified in Minnesota, New Jersey and New York).
Rock Island Arsenal (Rock Island Co.): 170. Aedes (O.) niger.
INDIANA
Locality not specified: 43. Psorophora (J.) musica.
LOUISIANA
Baton Rouge and vicinity (East Baton Rouge Par.): 29. Uranotaenia conti-
nentalis; 31. Uranotaenia coquilletti; 86. Aedes (O.) dupreei; 111. Aedes (O. )
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
infirmatus; 157. Aedes (O.) tormentor; 220. Culex (Mel.) erraticus.
New Orleans and vicinity (Orleans Par.): 4. Anopheles (A.) crucians (also
Locality not specified in Pennsylvania); 97. Aedes (O.) pallens; 208. Culex (C.)
quinquefasciatus; 209. Culex (C.) pungens; 210. Culex (C. ferruginosus; 225.
Culex (Mel. ) homoepas (Jackson Barracks).
MAINE
Locality not specified: 245. Schadonophasma trivittata.
Penobscot Co.: 252. Eucorethra underwoodi.
MARYLAND
Chestertown (Kent Co.): 12. Anopheles (A. ) punctipennis.
Plummer's Island (Montgomery Co.): 2. Anopheles (A.) barberi; 167. Ae-
des (F.) atropalpus.
MASSACHUSETTS :
Belchertown (Hampshire Co.): 79. Aedes (O.) pseudodiantaeus.
Brookline (Norfolk Co.): 238. Sayomyia albata.
Cambridge (Middlesex Co.): 177. Aedes (A.) fuscus.
Springfield (Hampden Co.): 246. Schadonophasma knabi.
MINNESOTA
Itasca State Park; along side of north boundary road, about 0.3 mi from
corner west of north arm of Lake Itasca (Clearwater Co.): 59. Aedes (O.)
barri.
Locality not specified: 253. Eucorethra americana (also Locality not spe-
cified in Illinois, New Jersey and New York).
Minneapolis, Lake of the Isles: 244. Sayomyia appendiculata.
St. Paul, Fort Snelling: 200. Culex (N.) frickii. — !
Virginia, Olcott Park, near greenhouse (St. Louis Co.): 189. Culiseta
(Culicella) minnesotae.
Wabasha, vicinity of (Wabasha Co.): 14. Anopheles (A.) quadrimaculatus.
MISSISSIPPI
Agricultural College (Oktibbeha Co. ): 228. Culex (Mel. ) incriminator. See
also Locality not specified.
Corinth (Alcorn Co.): 44. Psorophora (J.) horrida.
Electric Mills (Kemper Co.): 150. Aedes (O.) mississippii. :
Locality not specified, probably vicinity of Agricultural College: 19. Toxo-
rhynchites (L.) herrickii.
MONTANA
Bozeman (Gallatin Co.): 70. Aedes (O.) prodotes.
Drummond (Granite Co.): 95. Aedes (O.) mimesis. :
Fort Keogh, near Miles City (Custer Co.): 120. Aedes (O.) nigromaculis.
Missoula (Missoula Co.): 109. Aedes (O.) mutatus.
Story Creek railway crossing (Gallatin Co.): 134. Aedes (O.) schizopinax.
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Center Harbor (Belknap Co.): 26. Mansonia (C.) ochropus; 58. Aedes (O.)
aurifer; 190. Culiseta (Culicella) dyari; 193. Culiseta (Climacura) melanura.
j
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 29
Dublin (Cheshire Co.): 80. Aedes (O.) diantaeus.
NEW JERSEY
Chester (Morris Co. ):- 162. Aedes (O.) trivittatus.
Delair (Camden Co.): 50. Psorophora (G.) discolor.
Elizabeth (Union Co.): 213. Culex (C.) salinarius.
Garret Mt., Paterson (Passaic Co.): 66. Aedes (O.) nivitarsis; 163. Ae-
des (O.) inconspicuus; 199. Culex (N.) saxatilis.
Great Piece Meadow, probably near Chatham (Morris Co.): 142. Aedes
(O. ) pretans.
Hudson Co.: 151. Aedes (O.) classicus.
Lahaway (Ocean Co.): 22. Wyeomyia (W.) smithii; 254. Corethrella brak-
eleyi.
Livingston Park (Middlesex Co.): 88. Aedes (O.) siphonalis; 99. Aedes
(O.) sylvicola.
Locality not specified: 98. Aedes (O.) grossbecki; 253. Eucorethra ameri-
cana (also Locality not specified in Illinois, Minnesota and New York).
Newark (Essex Co.): 212. Culex (C.) brehmei.
New Brunswick (Middlesex Co.): 57. Aedes (O.) atlanticus (also Sanford,
Fla. ). :
| Orange [Watchung] Mts. (Essex Co.): 178. Aedes (A. ) pallidohirtus.
Summit (Union Co.): 68. Aedes (O.) cantator.
NEW MEXICO
Pecos Canyon (? San Miguel Co.): 108. Aedes (O.) vittatus.
NEW YORK
Brooklyn: 30. Uranotaenia sapphirina (also District of Columbia).
Eastern New York: 13. Anopheles (A.) hyemalis.
Elizabethtown and vicinity (Essex Co.): 53. Aedes (O.) abserratus; 72.
Aedes (O.) lazarensis; 131. Aedes (O.) auroides; 183. Culiseta (C.) absobrina;
251. Mochlonyx lintneri.
Ithaca (Tompkins Co.): 32. Orthopodomyia alba; 235. Chaoborus albipes.
Karner (Albany Co.): 89. Aedes (O.) abfitchii; 92. Aedes (O.) fitchii; 236.
Chaoborus rotundifolia; 250. Mochlonyx karnerensis.
Locality not specified: 159. Aedes @ ) cinereoborealis; 253. Eucorethra
americana (also Locality not specified in Illinois, Minnesota and New Jersey).
See also Nassau.
Nassau (Rensselaer Co.): 148. Aedes (O.) subcantans (uncertain); 249.
Mochlonyx fuliginosus.
Plattsburgh (Clinton Co.): 55. Aedes (O.) dysanor.
Poughkeepsie (Dutchess Co.): 233. Chaoborus hudsoni.
Sodus Point (Wayne Co.): 186. Culiseta (C.) magnipennis.
Syracuse, vicinity of Lake Onondaga (Onondaga Co. ): 82. Aedes (O.) onon-
dagensis. :
NORTH DAKOTA
Fort Lincoln (Burleigh Co.): 85. Aedes (O.) mediolineatus.
OREGON
Crater Lake, elev. 8000 ft (Klamath Co.): 76. Aedes (O.) masamae.
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
PENNSYLVANIA :
Camp Roosevelt, Mt. Gretna (Lebanon Co.): 9. Anopheles (A.) perplexens.
Locality not specified, probably vicinity of Philadelphia: 4. Anopheles (A.)
crucians (also New Orleans, La.); 153. Aedes (O.) damnosus; 169. Aedes (F. )
triseriatus; 205. Culex (C.) consobrinus; 243. Sayomyia punctipennis.
SOUTH CAROLINA
Charleston and vicinity (Charleston Co.): 24. Mansonia (C.) perturbans;
39. Psorophora (P.) conterrens; 136. Aedes (O.) sollicitans; 198. Culex (N. )
territans.
Columbia, 8.2 mi SW, near Watling Road between Columbia Air Base and
US Highway No. 1 (Lexington Co.): 20. Wyeomyia (W. ) haynei.
Hartsville (Darlington Co.): 41. Psorophora (P.) howardii.
Parr Shoals (Fairfield Co.): 222. Culex (Mel.) peribleptus.
Ten Mile Station (Charleston Co.): 35. Psorophora (P.) ciliata; 37. Pso-
rophora (P.) rubida; 38. Psorophora (P. ) boscii.
STATE NOT SPECIFIED
See Restrictions of Type Localities, p. 2-5.
Carolina; see Ten Mile Station, South Carolina: 35. Psorophora (P.) cili-
ata; 37. Psorophora (P.) rubida; 38. Psorophora (P.) boscii.
Mississippi River; see New Orleans, Louisiana: 208. Culex (C.) quinque-
fasciatus.
North-west Territory; see Wabasha, Minnesota: 14. Anopheles (A. ) qua-
drimaculatus. |
United States: 12. Anopheles (A.) punctipennis (See Chestertown, Mary-
land); for all the remaining see Charleston, South Carolina: 24. Mansonia (C.)
perturbans; 39. Psorophora (P.) conterrens; 136. Aedes (O.) sollicitans; 198.
Culex (N.) territans.
TEXAS
Brownsville (Cameron Co.): 40. Psorophora (P.) ctites; 42. Psorophora
(J.) cyanescens; 49. Psorophora (G.) texana; 61. Aedes (O.) bimaculatus; 154.
Aedes (O.) thelcter; 231. Deinocerites mathesoni.
Dallas (Dallas Co.): 223. Culex (Mel.) pose.
Harris Co.: 45. Psorophora (J.) longipalpus. 7
Kerrville (Kerr Co.): 145. Aedes (O.) gonimus; 171. Aedes (F.) zooso-
phus; 217. Culex (C.) thriambus; 255. Lutzomiops kerrvillensis. 3
Mission (Hidalgo Co.): 28. Uranotaenia syntheta; 172. Aedes (F.) alleni.
Plano (Collin Co.): 218. Culex (Mel. ) abominator.
UTAH
Salt Lake Co.: 122. Aedes (O.) niphadopsis.
VIRGINIA
Grassymead, near Fort Hunt (Fairfax Co.): 47. Psorophora (G.) columbi-
ae.
Mt. Vernon (Fairfax Co.): 247. Mochlonyx cinctipes.
Woodstock (Shenandoah Co. ): 18. Toxorhynchites fi) septentrionalis; 141.
Aedes (O.) hirsuteron.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 31
WASHINGTON
Cushman Lake (Mason Co.): 56. Aedes (O.) aloponotum.
Hoodsport (Mason Co.): 248. Mochlonyx obscurus.
Mt. Rainier National Park (Pierce Co. ; 52. Aedes (O.) aboriginis (Long-
mire Springs); 75. Aedes (O.) altiusculus (Indian Henry's).
WISCONSIN
Jefferson Co.: 5. Anopheles (A.) earlei.
Locality not specified: 15. Anopheles (A.) annulimanus; 25. Mansonia (C.)
testacea.
Saxeville (Waushara Co.): 192. Culiseta (Culicella) parodites.
WYOMING
Box Elder Creek, 19 mi W of Douglas (Converse Co.): 168. Aedes (F. )
hendersoni.
Yellowstone National Park, Shoshone Point, elev. 8200 ft: 62. Aedes (O.)
cacothius.
REFERENCES CITED
Aitken, Thomas H. G.
1945. Studies on the anopheline complex of western America. Calif. U.,
P. Ent. 7: 273-364:
Amyot, Charles J. B.
1858. Notice nécrologique sur Audinet-Serville. Soc. Ent. France, Ann.
(3) 6: 343-351.
Belkin, John N., C. L. Hogue, P. Galindo, T. H. G. Aitken, R. X. Schick
and W. A. Powder
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). II. Methods for the collec-
tion, rearing and preservation of mosquitoes. Amer. Ent. Inst.,
Contrib. 1(2): 19-78.
Belkin, John N., R. X. Schick, P. Galindo and T. H. G. Aitken
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). I. A project for a systema-
tic study of the mosquitoes of Middle America. Amer. Ent. Inst.,
Contrib. 1(2): 1-17.
Belkin, John N., R. X. Schick and S. J. Heinemann
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). V. Mosquitoes originally
described from Middle America. Amer. Ent. Inst., Contrib. 1(5): 1-
95.
Bellamy, R. Edward
1956. An investigation of the taxonomic status of Anopheles perplexens
Ludlow, 1907. Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 49: 515-529.
Bishopp, Fred C., E. N. Cory and A. Stone
1933. Preliminary results of a mosquito survey in the Chesapeake Bay
section. Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 35: 1-6.
Carpenter, Stanley J. and W. J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley, U.
Calif. Press. 360 p.
Coker, W. C.
1911. The garden of André Michaux. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., J. 27:
65-72.
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 6, 1966
Currie, Rolla P.
1904. An insect- uaenire:} trip to British Columbia. Ent. Soc. Wash.,
Proc. 6: 24-37.
Cuvier, Georges
1829. Eloge historique de M. Bosc. Mus. d'Hist. Nat., Mem. 18: 62-90.
Daggy, Richard H., O. J. Muegge and W. A. Riley
1940. A preliminary survey of the anopheline mosquito fauna of south-
eastern Minnesota and adjacent Wisconsin areas. Publ. Hlth. Rpts.56:
883-895.
Dyar, Harrison G.
1917. Notes on the Aedes of Montana. Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus 5:
104-121.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Wash., Carnegie Inst. (P. 387).
616 p.
Dyar, Harrison G. and F. Knab
1906. The larvae of Culicidae classified as independent organisms. N. Y.
Ent. Soc., J. 14: 169-230.
Ewan, J.
1957. L'activite des premiers explorateurs francais dans le S. E. des
Etats-Unis. In Les botanistes frangais en Amerique du Nord avant
1850. Paris, ‘Centre Nat. de la Recherche Scientifique (Colloques In-
ternationaux). p. 17-40.
James, Edwin
1823. Account of an expedition from Pittsburgh to the Rocky mountains,
performed in the years 1819, 1820. London; Longman, Hurst, Rees,
Orme and Brown. 3 v.
Keating, William H.
1824. Narrative of an expedition to the source of St. Peter's river...
Philadelphia, H. C. Carey & I. Lea. 2v.
King, Willard V. and G. H. Bradley |
1937. Notes on Culex erraticus and related species in the United States
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 30: 345-357.
Knight, Kenneth L.
1951. The Aedes (Ochlerotatus) punctor subgroup in North America (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 44: 87-99.
Long, Stephen H.
1823. A general description of the country traversed by the exploring ex-
pedition. In James, Edwin. Account of an expedition from Pittsburgh
to the Rocky mountains. London; Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and
Brown. v. 3: 189-267.
Natvig, Leif R.
1954. The type specimens of Aedes nigripes (Zett.). Norsk Ent. Tidsskr.
9: 86-92.
Palisot de Beauvois, Ambroise M. F. J.
1805-1821. Insectes recueillis en Afrique et en Amérique . .. Paris,
Fain et Cie. 276 p.
Peters, T. Michael and E. F. Cook :
1966. The nearctic Dixidae (Diptera). Ent. Soc. Amer., Misc. P. 5(5).
In press.
Ross, Herbert H. :
1947. The mosquitoes of Illinois (Diptera, Culicidae). Ill. Nat. Hist.
Survey, B. 24(1): 1-96.
Belkin et al: Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 33
Roth, Louis M.
1945. The male and larva of Psorophora (Janthinosoma) aes tain. (Dyar
and Knab) and a new species of Psorophora from the United States
(Diptera: Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 47: 1-23.
Rozeboom, Lloyd E. and W. H. W. Komp
1950. A review of the species of Culex of the subgenus Melanoconion
(Diptera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 43: 75-114.
Say, Thomas
1824. Appendix. Part I. -Natural History. I. Zoology. E. Class Insec-
ta In Keating, William H. Narrative of an expedition to the source of
St. Peter's river . . . Philadelphia, H. C. Carey & I. Lea. v. 2: 268-
378.
Stone, Alan
1957. Corrections in the taxonomy and nomenclature of mosquitoes (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Wash., Proc. 58: 333-344.
1958. Types of mosquitoes described by C. F. Adams in 1903 (Diptera,
Culicidae). Kansas Ent. Soc., J. 31: 235-237.
1962. A correction in mosquito nomenclature (Diptera: Culicidae). Ent.
. Soc. Wash., Proc. 63: 246.
1965. Two new Chaoboridae from the United States (Diptera). Ent. Soc.
Wash., Proc. 67: 231-233.
Stone, Alan and K. L. Knight
1955. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: I, The genera Armigeres, Psorophora, and Haemagogus (Dip-
tera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 45: 282-289.
1956a. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: II, The genus Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Bei, J:
46: 213- 228.
1956b. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: III, The genera Anopheles and Chagasia (Diptera, Culicidae).
“Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 46: 276-280.
1957a. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: IV, The genus Culex (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J.
47: 42-59.
1957b. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: V, The Sabethini (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 47:
117-126.
1957c. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Mu-
seum: VI, Miscellaneous genera, addenda and summary. Wash. Acad.
Sci., J. 47: 196-202.
Stone, Alan, K. L. Knight and H. Starcke
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culici-
dae). Wash., Ent. Soc. Amer. (Thomas Say Found. P. 6). 358 p.
Stone, Alan, C. W. Sabrosky, W. W. Wirth, R. H. Foote and J. R. Coulson
1965. A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S. Dept.
Agr., Agr. Handbook 276. 1696 p.
Theobald, Frederick V.
1903. A monograph of the Culicidae. ..v. 3. London, British Museum
(Nat. Hist.). 359 p.
Vockeroth, J. R.
1954. Notes on northern species of Aedes, with descriptions of two new
species (Diptera: Culicidae). Canad. Ent. 86: 109-116.
34
SYSTEMATIC INDEX
The names of the 255 topotypic North American species are in roman type.
They are indexed individually with reference to the appropriate genus and sub-
genus (where applicable), as well as classified under the latter. In the classi-
fied portions, junior synonyms, subspecies or infrasubspecies are also listed
under the name of the senior synonym or valid taxonomic species as given in
the catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Stone, Knight and Starcke 1959;
Stone 1961, 1963). An asterisk (*) denotes a type species of a generic group
and a number sign (#) a replacement name.
Extralimital senior synonyms are
underscored and are-listed only in the classified portion.
abfitchii, Aedes (O.), 11
abominator, Culex (Mel.), 21
aboriginis, Aedes (O.), 8
abserratus, Aedes (O.), 8
*absobrina, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
acrophilus, Aedes (O.), 14
AEDES (AEDES) [3]
cinereus
fuscus, 18
hemiteleus, 18
pallidohirtus, 18
AEDES (AEDIMORPHUS) [2]
vexans
euochrus, 18
#montcalmi (sylvestris), 18
*sylvestris, 18
AEDES (FINLAYA) [6]
alleni (zoosophus), 17
atropalpus, 17
hendersoni, 17
niger (triseriatus), 17
*triseriatus, 17
niger, 17
zoosophus, 17
alleni, 17
AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS) [115]
abfitchii (excrucians), 11
aboriginis, 8
abserratus, 8
centrotus, 9
dysanor, 9
acrophilus (pullatus), 14
aestivalis (sticticus), 15
albertae (stimulans), 16
aldrichi (sticticus), 15
aloponotum, 9
altiusculus (communis), 10
atlanticus, 9
*aurifer, 9
auroides (punctor), 14
barri, 9
bicristatus, 9
bimaculatus, 9
borealis (communis), 10
cacothius, 9
callithotrys (campestris), 9
campestris, 9
callithotrys, 9
*canadensis, 10
mathesoni, 10
nivitarsis, 10
cantator, 10
cataphylla, 10
pacificensis, 10
prodotes, 10
AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS)
centrotus (abserratus), 9
cinereoborealis (trichurus), 17
classicus (stimulans), 16
communis
altiusculus, 10
borealis, 10
lazarensis, 10
masamae, 10
prolixus, 10
tahoensis, 10
curriei (dorsalis), 11
cyclocerculus (hexodontus), 12
damnosus (taeniorhynchus), 16
decticus, 10
pseudodiantaeus, 11
deniedmannii (squamiger), 15
diantaeus, 11
dorsalis
curriei, 11
lativittatus, 11
mediolineatus, 11
onondagensis, 11
quaylei, 11
dupreei, 11
dysanor (abserratus), 9
euedes (excrucians), 11
excrucians, 11
abfitchii, 11
euedes, 11
sansoni, 11
siphonalis, 11
fisheri (ventrovittis), 17
fitchii, 11
mimesis, 12
palustris, 12
pricei, 12
flavescens
fletcheri, 12
fletcheri (flavescens), 12
fulvus
pallens, 12
gonimus (sticticus), 16
griseus (nigromaculis), 14
grossbecki, 12
sylvicola, 12
hewitti (increpitus), 13
hexodontus, 12
cyclocerculus, 12
labradorensis, 12
leuconotips, 12
hirsuteron (sticticus), 15
idahoensis (spencerii), 15
impiger, 12
nearcticus, 12
Index to Topotypic North American Mosquitoes
AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS)
implacabilis (punctor), 14
implicatus, 12
inconspicuus (trivittatus), 17
increpitus, 13
hewitti, 13
mutatus, 13
vittatus, 13
infirmatus, 13
innuitus (nigripes), 14
intrudens, 13
iridipennis (muelleri), 13
keyensis (thelcter), 16
klotsi (melanimon), 13
labradorensis (hexodontus), 12
lativittatus (dorsalis), 11
lazarensis (communis), 10
leuconotips (hexodontus), 12
masamae (communis), 10
mathesoni (canadensis), 10
mediolineatus (dorsalis), 11
melanimon, 13
klotsi, 13
mercurator (stimulans), 16
mimesis (fitchii), 12
mississippii (stimulans), 16
mitchellae, 13
monticola, 13
muelleri
iridipennis, 13
mutatus (increpitus), 13
nearcticus (impiger), 12
nigripes, 13
innuitus, 14
nigromaculis, 14
griseus, 14
niphadopsis, 14
nivitarsis (canadensis), 10
onondagensis (dorsalis), 11
pacificensis (cataphylla), 10
pagetonotum (trichurus), 17
pallens (fulvus), 12
palustris (fitchii), 12
pearyi (pullatus), 14
pionips, 14
poliochros (trichurus), 17
pretans (sticticus), 15
pricei (fitchii), 12
prodotes (cataphylla), 10
prolixus (communis), 10
provocans (punctor), 14
pseudodiantaeus (decticus), 11
*pullatus, 14
acrophilus, 14
pearyi, 14
punctodes, 14
punctor, 14
auroides, 14
implacabilis, 14
provocans, 14
quaylei (dorsalis), 11
rempeli, 15
riparius, 15
sansoni (excrucians), 11
schizopinax, 15
sierrensis, 15
siphonalis (excrucians), 11
AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS)
sollicitans, 3,4, 15
spencerii, 15
idahoensis, 15
*squamiger, 15
deniedmannii, 15
sticticus
aestivalis, 15
aldrichi, 15
gonimus, 16
hirsuteron, 15
pretans, 15
vinnipegensis, 16
stimulans, 16
albertae, 16
classicus, 16
mercurator, 16
mississippii, 16
subcantans, 16
subcantans (stimulans), 16
sylvicola (grossbecki), 12
taeniorhynchus
damnosus, 16
tahoensis (communis), 10
thelcter, 16
keyensis, 16
thibaulti, 16
tormentor, 16
trichurus, 16
cinereoborealis, 17
pagetonotum, 17
poliochros, 17
*trivittatus, 17
inconspicuus, 17
varipalpus, 17
ventrovittis, 17
fisheri, 17
vinnipegensis (sticticus), 16
vittatus (increpitus), 13
AEDES (STEGOMYIA) [2]
aegypti
excitans, 18
taeniatus, 18
aestivalis, Aedes (O.), 15
affinis, Culex (C.), 20
alaskaensis, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
alba, Orthopodomyia, 7
albata, Sayomyia, 22
albertae, Aedes (O.), 16
albipes, Chaoborus, 22
aldrichi, Aedes (O.), 15
alleni, Aedes (F.), 17
aloponotum, Aedes (O.), 9
altiusculus, Aedes (O.), 10
*americana, Eucorethra, 23
americanus, Chaoborus, 22
anhydor, Uranotaenia, 7
*anips, Culex (Mel.), 21
annulata, Sayomyia, 22
annulimanus, Anopheles (A.), 6
ANOPHELES (ANOPHELES) [16]
annulimanus (quadrimaculatus), 6
atropos, 5
*parberi, 5
boydi (pseudopunctipennis franciscanus), 6
bradleyi, 5
crucians, 5
35
36 Index to Topotypic North American Mosquitoes
ANOPHELES (ANOPHELES) consobrinus, Culex (C.), 20
earlei, 5 conterrens, Psorophora (P.), 3, 4, 8
franciscanus (pseudopunctipennis), 5 continentalis, Uranotaenia, 7
freeborni, 5 coquilletti, Uranotaenia, 7
georgianus, 5 CORETHRELLA [1]
hyemalis (punctipennis), 6 *brakeleyi, 24
occidentalis, 5 crucians, Anopheles (A.), 5
perplexens, 5 ctites, Psorophora (P.), 8
pseudopunctipennis franciscanus, 5 CULEX (CULEX) [17]
boydi, 6 affinis (#peus), 20
punctipennis, 2, 6 badgeri (erythrothorax), 20
hyemalis, 6 brehmei (restuans), 20
quadrimaculatus, 3, 6 comitatus (pipiens pallens), 20
annulimanus, 6 consobrinus (pipiens), 20
walkeri, 6 dipseticus (pipiens pallens), 20
antoinetta, Wyeomyia (W.), 6 erythrothorax, 20
apicalis, Culex (N.), 19 badgeri, 20
appendiculata, Sayomyia, 23 ferruginosus (pipiens quing.), 20
arizonensis, Culex (N.), 19 kelloggii (tarsalis), 21
astictopus, Sayomyia, 23 #peus (pro affinis), 20
atlanticus, Aedes (O.), 9 affinis, 20
atropalpus, Aedes (F.), 17 *stigmatosoma, 20
atropos, Anopheles (A.), 5 | pipiens pallens
*aurifer, Aedes (O.), 9 comitatus, 20
auroides, Aedes (O.), 14 dipseticus, 20
pipiens pipiens
badgeri, Culex (C.), 20 consobrinus, 20
*barberi, Anopheles (A.), 5 pipiens quinquefasciatus, 4, 20
barri, Aedes (O.), 9 ferruginosus, 20
bicristatus, Aedes (O.), 9 pungens, 20
bimaculatus, Aedes (O.), 9 pungens (pipiens quing.), 20
#boharti, Culex (N.), 19 quinquefasciatus (pipiens), 4, 20
borealis, Aedes (O.), 10 — restuans, 20
borealis, Chaoborus, 22 brehmei, 20
boscii, Psorophora (P.), 3, 4, 7 salinarius, 21
- boydi, Anopheles (A.), 6 *stigmatosoma (peus), 20
bradleyi, Anopheles (A.), 5 tarsalis, 21
*prakeleyi, Corethrella, 24 kelloggii, 21
brehmei, Culex (C.), 20 willistoni, 21
brittoni, Culiseta (Culicella), 19 thriambus, 21
willistoni (tarsalis), 21
cacothius, Aedes (O.), 9 CULEX (MELANOCONION) [11]
californica, Orthopodomyia, 7 abominator, 21
callithotrys, Aedes (O.), 9 *anips, 21
campestris, Aedes (O.), 9 degustator (erraticus), 21
*canadensis, Aedes (O.), 10 egberti (erraticus), 21
cantator, Aedes (O.), 10 erraticus, 21
cataphylla, Aedes (O.), 10 degustator, 21
centrotus, Aedes (O.), 9 , egberti, 21
CHAOBORUS [6] | homoepas, 21
albipes (flavicans), 22 peribleptus, 21
americanus, 22 pose, 21
hudsoni, 22 homoepas (erraticus), 21
borealis, 22 incriminator (peccator), 22
eluthera (flavicans), 22 mulrennani, 21
flavicans peccator, 22
albipes, 22 incriminator, 22
eluthera, 22 | peribleptus (erraticus), 21
rotundifolia, 22 © pose (erraticus), 21
hudsoni (americanus), 22 CULEX (MOCHLOSTYRAX) [2]
rotundifolia (flavicans), 22 . pilosus
*ciliata, Psorophora (P.), 3, 7 | deceptor, 22
cinctipes, Mochlonyx, 23 floridanus, 22
cinereoborealis, Aedes (O.), 17 CULEX (NEOCULEX) [7]
classicus, Aedes (O.), 16 apicalis, 19
columbiae, Psorophora (G.), 8 arizonensis, 19
comitatus, Culex (C.), 20
Index to Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 37
CULEX (NEOCULEX)
#boharti, 19
reevesi Bohart, 19
frickii (territans), 20
reevesi Bohart (#boharti), 20
reevesi Wirth, 19
saxatilis (territans), 19
*territans, 3, 4, 19
frickii, 19
saxatilis, 19
CULISETA (CLIMACURA) [1]
*melanura, 19
CULISETA (CULICELLA) [4]
brittoni (morsitans), 19
*dyari (morsitans), 19
minnesotae, 19
morsitans
brittoni, 19
*dyari, 19
parodites, 19
CULISETA (CULISETA) [9]
*absobrina (impatiens), 18
alaskaensis, 18
impatiens, 18
*absobrina, 18
pinguis, 18
incidens, 18
inornata, 18
magnipennis, 19
maccrackenae (particeps), 19
magnipennis (inornata), 19
particeps, 19 :
maccrackenae, 19
pinguis (impatiens), 18
curriei, Aedes (O.), il
*cyanescens, Psorophora (J.), 8
cyclocerculus, Aedes (O.), 12
damnosus, Aedes (O.), 16
deceptor, Culex (Mochl.), 22
decticus, Aedes (O.), 10
degustator, Culex (Mel.), 21
DEINOCERITES [1]
mathesoni, 22
deniedmannii, Aedes (O.), 15
diantaeus, Aedes (O.), 11
dipseticus, Culex (C.), 20
*discolor, Psorophora (G.), 8
dupreei, Aedes (O.), 11
*dyari, Culiseta (Culicella), 19
dysanor, Aedes (O.), 9
earlei, Anopheles (A.), 5
egberti, Culex (Mel.), 21
eluthera, Chaoborus, 22
erraticus, Culex (Mel.), 21
erythrothorax, Culex (C.), 20
EUCORETHRA [2]
*underwoodi, 23
*americana, 23
euedes, Aedes (O.), 11
euochrus, Aedes (Aedim.), 18
excitans, Aedes (S.), 18
excrucians, Aedes (O.), 11
ferruginosus, Culex (C.), 20
fisheri, Aedes (O.), 17
fitchii, Aedes (O.), 11
fletcheri, Aedes (O.), 12
floridanus, Culex (Mochl.), 22
floridensis, Psorophora (G.), 8
franciscanus, Anopheles (A.), 5
freeborni, Anopheles (A.), 5
frickii, Culex (N.), 20
fulginosus, Mochlonyx, 23
fuscus, Aedes (A.), 18
georgianus, Anopheles (A.), 5
gonimus, Aedes (O.), 16
griseus, Aedes (O.), 14
grossbecki, Aedes (O.), 12
haynei, Wyeomyia (W.), 6
-hemiteleus, Aedes (A.), 18
hendersoni, Aedes (F.), 17
herrickii, Toxorhynchites (L.), 6
hewitti, Aedes (O.), 13
hexodontus, Aedes (O.), 12
hirsuteron, Aedes (O.), 15
homoepas, Culex (Mel.), 21
horrida, Psorophora (J.), 8
howardii, Psorophora (P.), 8
hudsoni, Chaoborus, 22
hyemalis, Anopheles (A.), 6
idahoensis, Aedes (O.), 15
impatiens, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
impiger, Aedes (O.), 12
implacabilis, Aedes (O.), 14
implicatus, Aedes (O.), 12
incidens, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
inconspicuus, Aedes (O.), 17
increpitus, Aedes (O.), 13
incriminator, Culex (Mel.), 22
infirmatus, Aedes (O.), 13
innuitus, Aedes (O.), 14
inornata, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
intrudens, Aedes (O.), 13
iridipennis, Aedes (O.), 13
karnerensis, Mochlonyx, 23
kelloggii, Culex (C.), 21
kerrvillensis, Lutzomiops, 24
keyensis, Aedes (O.), 16
klotsi, Aedes (O.), 13
knabi, Schadonophasma, 23
labradorensis, Aedes (O.), 12
lacustris, Sayomyia, 23
lativittatus, Aedes (O.), 11
lazarensis, Aedes (O.), 10
leuconotips, Aedes (O.), 12
lintneri, Mochlonyx, 23
longipalpis, Psorophora (J.), 8
longipalpus, Psorophora (J.), 8
LUTZOMIOPS [1]
kerrvillensis, 24
maccrackenae, Culiseta (Culiseta), 19
maculipes, Sayomyia, 23
magnipennis, Culiseta (Culiseta), 19
MANSONIA (COQUILLETTIDIA) [3]
ochropus (perturbans), 7
38 Index to Topotypic North American Mosquitoes
MANSONIA (COQUILLETTIDIA) pretans, Aedes (O.), 15
*perturbans, 3, 6 pricei, Aedes (O.), 12
ochropus, 7 prodotes, Aedes (O.), 10
testacea, 7 prolixus, Aedes (O.), 10
testacea (perturbans), 7 provocans, Aedes (O.), 14
masamae, Aedes (O.), 10 pseudodiantaeus, Aedes (O.), 11
mathesoni, Aedes (O.-), 10 PSOROPHORA (GRABHAMIA) [5]
mathesoni, Deinocerites, 22 columbiae (confinnis), 8
mediolineatus, Aedes (O.), 11 confinnis
melanimon, Aedes (O.), 13 columbiae, 8
*melanura, Culiseta (Climacura), 19 floridensis, 8
mercurator, Aedes (O.), 16 texana, 8
mimesis, Aedes (O.), 12 *discolor, 8
minnesotae, Culiseta (Culicella), 19 floridensis (confinnis), 8
mississippii, Aedes (O.), 16 nana (pygmaea), 8
mitchellae, Aedes (O.), 13 pygmaea
MOCHLONYX [5] nana, 8 |
cinctipes, 23 texana (confinnis), 8
obscurus, 23 PSOROPHORA (JANTHINOSOMA) [5]
fulginosus, 23 *cyanescens, 8
karnerensis (velutinus), 23 ferox
lintneri (velutinus), 23 *musica, 8
obscurus (cinctipes), 23 #sayi Dyar & Knab (pro musica), 8
velutinus #sayi Theobald (pro musica), 8
karnerensis, 23 horrida, 8
lintneri, 23 longipalpis (longipalpus), 8
molesta, Psorophora (P.), 7 longipalpus, 8
#montcalmi, Aedes (Aedim.), 18 longipalpis, 8
monticola, Aedes (O.), 13 *musica (ferox), 8
mulrennani, Culex (Mel.), 21 #sayi Dyar & Knab (pro musica), 8
*musica, Psorophora (J.), 8 #sayi Theobald (pro musica), 8
mutatus, Aedes (O.), 13 PSOROPHORA (PSOROPHORA) [7]
boscii (ciliata), 3, 4, 7
nana, Psorophora (G.), 8 *eiliata, 3; 7
nearcticus, Aedes (O.), 12 boscii, 3, 4, 7
niger, Aedes (F.), 17 conterrens, 3, 4, 8
nigripes, Aedes (O.), 13 ctites, 8
nigromaculis, Aedes (O.), 14 molesta, 7
niphadopsis, Aedes (O.), 14 rubida, 4, 7
nivitarsis, Aedes (O.), 10 conterrens (ciliata), 3, 4, 8
1 ctites (ciliata), 8
obscurus, Mochlonyx, 23 howardii, 8
occidentalis, Anopheles (A.), 5 molesta (ciliata), 7
ochropus, Mansonia (C.), 7 rubida (ciliata), 4, 7
onondagensis, Aedes (O.), 11 *pullatus, Aedes (O.), 14
ORTHOPODOMYIA [3] : punctipennis, Anopheles (A.), 2, 6
alba, 7 *punctipennis, Sayomyia, 23
californica, 7 punctodes, Aedes (O.), 14
*sionifera, 7 punctor, Aedes (O.), 14
: pungens, Culex (C.), 20
pacificensis, Aedes (O.), 10
pagetonotum, Aedes (O.), 17 quadrimaculatus, Anopheles (A.), 3, 6
pallens, Aedes (O.), 12 | quaylei, Aedes (O.),11
pallidohirtus, Aedes (A.), 18 | quinquefasciatus, Culex (C.), 4, 20
palustris, Aedes (O.), 12
parodites, Culiseta (Culicella), 19 reevesi Bohart, Culex (N.), 19
particeps, Culiseta (Culiseta), 19 reevesi Wirth, Culex (N.), 19
pearyi, Aedes (O.), 14 - rempeli, Aedes (O.), 15
peccator, Culex (Mel.), 22 restuans, Culex (C.), 20
peribleptus, Culex (Mel.), 21 riparius, Aedes (O.), 15 —
perplexens, Anopheles (A.), 5 rotundifolia, Chaoborus, 22
*perturbans, Mansonia (C.), 3, 6 rubida, Psorophora (P.), 4, 7
#peus, Culex (C.), 20 rutilus, Toxorhynchites (L.), 6
pinguis, Culiseta (Culiseta), 18
pionips, Aedes (O.), 14 salinarius, Culex (C.), 21
poliochros, Aedes (O.), 17 sansoni, Aedes (O.), 11
pose, Culex (Mel.), 21 sapphirina, Uranotaenia, 7
Index to Topotypic North American Mosquitoes 39
saxatilis, Culex (N.), 19
#sayi Dyar & Knab, Psorophora (J.), 8
#sayi Theobald, Psorophora (J.), 8
SAYOMYIA [7]
albata, 22
annulata, 22
appendiculata (punctipennis), 23
astictopus, 23
lacustris, 23
lacustris (astictopus), 23
maculipes, 23
*punctipennis, 23
appendiculata, 23
SCHADONOPHASMA [2]
nyblaei
knabi, 23
*trivittata, 23
schizopinax, Aedes (O.), 15
septentrionalis, Toxorhynchites (L.), 6
sierrensis, Aedes (O.), 15
*signifera, Orthopodomyia, 7
siphonalis, Aedes (O.), 11
*smithii, Wyeomyia (W.), 6
sollicitans, Aedes (O.), 3, 4, 15
spencerii, Aedes (O.), 15
*squamiger, Aedes (O.), 15
*stigmatosoma, Culex (C.), 20
stimulans, Aedes (O.), 16
subcantans, Aedes (O.), 16
*sylvestris, Aedes (Aedim.), 18
sylvicola, Aedes (O.), 12
syntheta, Uranotaenia, 7
taeniatus, Aedes (S.), 18
tahoensis, Aedes (O.), 10
tarsalis, Culex (C.), 21
*territans, Culex (N.), 3, 4, 19
testacea, Mansonia (C.), 7
texana, Psorophora (G.), 8
thelcter, Aedes (O.), 16
thibaulti, Aedes (O.), 16
thriambus, Culex (C.), 21
tormentor, Aedes (O.), 16
TOXORHYNCHITES (LYNCHIELLA) [3]
herrickii (rutilis septentrionalis), 6
rutilis, 6
herrickii, 6
septentrionalis, 6
- septentrionalis (rutilis), 6
herrickii, 6
trichurus, Aedes (O.), 16
*triseriatus, Aedes (F.), 17
*trivittata, Schadonophasma, 23
*trivittatus, Aedes (O.), 17
*underwoodi, Eucorethra, 23
URANOTAENIA [5]
anhydor, 7
syntheta, 7
continentalis (lowii), 7
coquilletti (sapphirina), 7
lowii
continentalis, 7
sapphirina, 7
coquilletti, 7
syntheta (anhydor), 7
vanduzeei, Wyeomyia (W.), 6
varipalpus, Aedes (O.), 17
ventrovittis, Aedes (O.), 17
vinnipegensis, Aedes (O.), 16
vittatus, Aedes (O.), 13
walkeri, Anopheles (A.), 6
willistoni, Culex (C.), 21
WYEOMYIA (WYEOMYIA) [4]
antoinetta (mitchellii), 6
haynei, 6
mitchellii
antoinetta, 6
*smithii, 6
vanduzeei, 6
zoosophus, Aedes (F.), 17
Lo ff
sy
mp,
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
vey
Volume 1, Number 7, 1967
STUDIES OF THE WORLD GYPONINAE
(HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE)
A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS PONANA
By .
DWIGHT M. DELONG and PAUL H. FREYTAG
MEMOIRS OF THE AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
(Subscribers to this series receive a 10% discount on all volumes. )
No. 1. Townes, Henry, Marjorie Townes, and Virendra K. Gupta, 1961.
A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo- Australian Ichneumonidae.
522 pages. Price: $14.50, postpaid
No. 2. Townes, Henry, and Virendra K. Gupta, 1962. Ichneumonidae of
America north of Mexico: 4, Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini.
305 pages, 162 maps, 116 figures. Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
No. 3. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. Ichneumonidae of America north of Mexico: 5.
Subfamily Diplazontinae. 305 pages, 111 maps, 153 figures.
Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
No. 4. Matsuda, Ryuichi, 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head.
334 pages, 111 figures. Price: $ 9.50, postpaid
No. 5. Townes, Henry, Setsuya Momoi, and Marjorie Townes, 1965.
A catalogue and reclassification of the eastern Palearctic Ichneumonidae.
661 pages. Price: $18.00, postpaid
No. 6. Cook, David R., 1966. The water mites of Liberia.
418 pages, 922 figures. Price: $11.00, postpaid
No. 7. Delfinado, Mercedes, 1966. The culicine mosquitoes of the Philippines.
252 pages, 275 figures. Price: $ 8.00, postpaid
No. 8. Townes, Henry, and Marjorie Townes, 1966. A catalogue and reclassifi-
cation of the Neotropic Ichneumonidae. |
367 pages. Price: $11.00, postpaid
No. 9. Cook, David R., 1967. Water mites from India.
411 pages, 901 figures. — Price: $11.00, postpaid
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Volume 1, to be completed with numbers totaling 500 pages, Price $12.00,
postpaid. Note: Orders for separate issues that total less than $8.00 must be
accompanied by payment.
Parts of Volume 1 issued to date, with individual prices:
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera,
Ichneumonidae). 75 pages, 69figures. Price: $ 2.25, postpaid
No. 2. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
I, Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the
mosquitoes of Middle America.
Il. Belkin, John N., et al. Methods for the collection, rearing and
preservation of mosquitoes. :
78 pages, 4 figures. Price: $ 2.25, postpaid 4
No. 3. Matthews, Robert W., 1965. The biology of Heriades carinata Cresson. :
(Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). 33 pages, 23 figures
| : Price: $ 1.00, postpaid
No. 4. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
: Ill. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from
Tonga and Samoa.
IV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum
of Salem expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $ 1.00, postpaid
No. 5. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
V. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America. 95 pages.
| Price: $ 2.75, postpaid
No. 6. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1966.
VI. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from North America.
39 pages. Price: $ 1.00, postpaid
No. 7. DeLong, Dwight M. and Paul H. Freytag, 1967. Studies of the world
Gyponinae (Homopotera, Cicadellidae). A synopsis of the genus
Ponana. 86 pages, 257 figures. Price: $ 2.50, postpaid
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 7, 1967
oy"
STUDIES OF THE WORLD GYPONINAE
(HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE)
A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS PONANA
By
DWIGHT M. DELONG and PAUL H. FREYTAG
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREV OCHOUON 6s y55 1 WN 06a a ek ae en es Mae ee Rk Oe ee oboe Oh Ra I
The GENUS PONANG «0c View a4 cue ee ed chad eee ee shee ce eebeeres 3
Key to Subgenera Of Ponana ......ccccccccccccccvccsssesessessseses 3
The Subgenus Ponana .......... bcc eek se wink 4 ANNO wee ees 3
Key to Species Of Ponana . ic... cece cess ct svccervsosceweuss erate.
Descriptions of Species of Ponana .......... hee ON a Rw siete © 4 kaw Oe 9
The Saber s. Se GpOnnna bo ica kG Caiaw bk ves Cie Uk eed se ea ees 43
Key to Species of NeopOnana <4. .eiessccs ens ss Wie Uhed (eens oe ees 43
Descriptions of Species of Neoponana ........cccccccccccccccees 45
PAG SUDCCRUS: BUPA bk bo 0l0.6 Gis oo Wino U'siew 005 e's 05 n16 ni8 © 0 wiels ae e's wale oP)
Key to species OF BUMaNa 2c coe se ee eee ced cede ese seeks s o4
Descriptions of Species of Bulbana Pe o4
ena Os so bars cs se eee eee) 56
PRPIONATON OF PIGUPES as 45 dials oo esas a sinew siele sie wees ROR ne 28
Wee Ol Species TYeALe? oo. sires cas cic cs oe Cs iw ed Ras woe ere eee 86
STUDIES OF THE WORLD GY PONINAE
(HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE)
A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS PONANA!
By Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag”
The Ohio State University
INTRODUCTION
In 1920 Ball made the first attempt to review and revise the genus Gypona.
He suggested the grouping of previously described species and proposed five sub-
generic names, one of which was Ponana, He placed fourteen species in Ponana.
Seven of these are still included in Ponana and several which Ball treated as sub-
species or synonyms have been given specific ranking. This is partially due to
the fact that he misidentified several of the Spangberg and Stal species.
In 1942, DeLong reviewed the North American species of Gyponinae and
recognized Ponana as a genus, placing twenty-six species in this group, six of
which were described as new. Eleven previously described species were placed
in synonomy. DeLong also described the genus Bulbana and four species closely
related to Ponana. |
In 1949 Oman recognized twenty-one species of Ponana in his treatment of
the Nearctic Leafhoppers and treated Bulbana as a subgenus of Ponana.
In 1962 Metcalf, in his general catalogue of the Homoptera, Fascicle VI,
part 3, the Gyponinae, placed seventy-five species in Ponana. Since he did not
have the opportunity of examining the types of the European authors he misplaced
several species generically.
The present treatment has indicated that there are at least three groups of
closely related species which are treated here as subgenera of Ponana. The
largest of these is the subgenus Ponana which contains some fifty-five species
occurring in North and Central America. The subgenus Bulbana contains four
known species which occur in the southwestern United States and probably will
be found in northern Mexico. A third group described below as the subgenus
Neoponana contains some fourteen species found in countries of South and Central —
America, none of which have apparently been described previously. On this basis
some seventy-three species have been assigned to the genus Ponana. Several
species previously placed in Ponana have been assigned to other genera and will
be treated in subsequent generic reports. :
The species of Ponana and its closely related generic relatives possess
an aedeagus composed of a central shaft which arises ventrally at the base and a
I this work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant NSF-G 9803.
2Now a member of the Biology Department at Arkansas State College.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
pair of structures which arise dorsally near the base, bend ventrally andusually
extend caudally close to the shaft, forming a sheath for it. These structures have
previously been referred to as the lateral paired processes and by other similar
designations. The name aedalati is proposed for these portions of the aedeagus
and this term has been used in the following discussions.
ACKNOW LEDGEMENTS
A study of the World Gyponinae would have been impossible without the
assistance and cooperation of several persons and the use of specimens in several
museums and university collections.
Through the kindness of Dr. W. E.China and Mr. R. J. Izzard, the Walker
and Fowler types were studied in the British Museum of Natural History. More
recently we have been assisted by Dr. W. J. Knight. Dr. Eric Kjellander has
kindly permitted the study of all the Spangberg and Stal types in the Stockholm
Museum and Dr. Max Beier, a detailed study of the Spangberg types in the Vienna
Museum.
The material in the U. S. National Museum has been made available for study
through the kindness of Dr. James Kramer. The Metcalf types and a large quan-
tity of unidentified material in the North Carolina State College collection have
been studied through the kindness of Dr. David Young. The types in the Carnegie
- Museum were studied through the kindness of Dr. George Wallace. The types in
The Ohio State University collection were studied by the permission of Dr. |
Charles Triplehorn.
Other sources of material have been the University of Kansas (Dr. George
Byers); the California Academy of Science Collection (Dr. Don C. MacNeill);
the American Museum of Natural History (Dr. Herbert Ruckes, Sr.); the Univer-
sity of Michigan (Dr. T. E. Moore); and the Michigan State University (Dr. Roland
Fischer). Specimens and types of several species were supplied by the DeLong
collection of North and Central American Gyponinae.
To all of those who have helped, whether by permission to study types, loan
of material, or helpful suggestions, the authors express their sincere appre-
ciation. ,
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 3
Genus Ponana Ball
Head distinctly narrower than pronotum, anterior margin blunt, usually
broadly rounded. Crown-short, but always longer medially than next the eyes,
with transverse striae of variable size. Ocelli large on anterior portion.
Pronotum with lateral margins carinate, surface transversely striate. Fore-
wings with normal venation and a distinct appendix. Male plates variable in
shape and size. Apex of pygofer variable in shape. Styles elongate, variable
in shape, apex sometimes cleft. Aedeagus with a median slender shaft and
paired lateral sheath like portions, the aedalati, which are variable in length.
Type: Gypona scarlatina Fitch.
Key to Subgenera of Ponana
i. Clypeus only slightly swollen or inflated, with a shallow,
transverse, depression just below anterior margin of head.
Color pale green, yellow to orange, usually with dark
WIGTRIGGS Oe Aes ae ces ee ee es ees bo ree bw sees 2
es Clypeus usually convexly produced, tumid, without a trans-
verse depression below margin of head. Color green
WitlOut Muarkities (NOT) America)... +e. sn eee n ses Subgenus Bulbana -
2 (1) Margin of crown usually with rather fine striae. Clypeus
without a median transverse carina between antennal
sockets. Aedeagal shaft cleft at apex with caudally pro-
jected apical processes only (except in distortia) (North
ane Central Aimeri@dy/ ss. be ce ec lees cs becceces Subgenus Ponana
2' Margin of crown usually with coarse, deep striae. Clypeus :
with a median transverse carina between antennal sockets.
Aedeagal shaft with conspicuous lateral processes arising
on terminal portion (except in bola and dulera (South
WMCViCa) oS a ee Subgenus Neoponana, new subgenus
Ponana, Subgenus Ponana Ball
Crown broadly rounded, longer medially than next the eyes. Clypeus only
slightly inflated, without a median transverse carina between the ventral portion
of antennal sockets; with a shallow transverse depression just below margin of
head. Aedeagus usually cleft at apex forming caudally directed apical processes.
Type of subgenus: Gypona scarlatina Fitch.
The species of this subgenus occur in North and Central America.
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana (Males)
1; Aedeagal shaft asynimetrical (Pic. 130)... 0 ce eee ee ee es distortia
Ne Aedeagal shaft normally symmetrical (Fig. 9) ........... sce aeeeee 2
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
2 (1')
10 (9")
10°
11 (8°)
ii’
12 (11')
Pygofer with apex sharp-pointed, ending in a spine-like
projection (Fic. 182). kel wads oe. partes as Poubin ses s resa
Pygofer often narrowed and bluntly pointed, but not
terminated in a sharp-pointed projection (Fig. 102) ........e.ecee. +e
Aedeagal shaft appearing cleft at apex, producing some
type of terminal processes (Figs. 36, 93) ...ccccccccecee PPO aes
Aedeagal shaft not appearing cleft at apex
(Figs. 77, 06, 66) @eeeoeeoeeeeeesee eeeee ® ®@ @eeeeoeeoeee1eeese@eese#92s2e8e8e8eee2e @ “@@ee8e@ @ 4
Aedeagal shaft blunt at apex with subapical paired peutearcentee
extending basally (Mies, 77, 78) o ioc es Was OS es notula
Aedeagal shaft with terminal lateral processes (Figs. 56, 66) ....... 5
Aedalati not as long as shaft, proximal to shaft and tapered
to slender:bilunt apices (Fig... 96) 3s c.eie ic c:s ore-p0ie.g oe tee eemwe es . ¢incta
Aedalati abruptly narrowed to sharp-pointed apices, as long ;
as shaft and diverging at apex (Fig. 66) ......cccccccccce divergens
Aedeagal shaft with the terminus or apical processes extending
to or beyond the apices of the aedalati (Figs. 41, 5) ....... ccc cccce 7
Aedeagal shaft with the terminus or apical processes not as
long as the aedalati (Fig. 59) ....cccccccccccccs shud Sasha's oe hace 45
Aedeagal shaft not exceeding the aedalati in length (Fig. 65) ........ 8
Aedeagal shaft longer than the aedalati (Fig. 5)........eseeeeece Pee ee
Aedeagal terminal processes long, separated by a rather 3
deep V-shaped notch (Fig. 65) .......... ee ie ea wey 8s ab an 9
Aedeagal terminal processes short, separated by a broad
U-shaped otch (Pig. 83) ao Goss oink vies ow eis 6d 6'e ei Wee ok CLI 11
Aedeagal terminal processes separated by a small lobe at
apex of V-shaped notch (Fig. 41) ..... ee Vi baWleaG Wace ee Wek vinula
Aedeagal terminal processes not separated by lobe at base
(Fig. 65) @eeoeeeoeeee1ee1ee@eee7eeeeogsesmsneaeeee2aeee74e«eeoeoe#eeawaeoeeosane*7;,) Ce seesreeeoeeeeesk eee @®eee 10
Aedalati appearing truncate apically, style with a long bent
BMECAL DONOR AP eee I fA as dc cha cteid Bie u orb wcuee asm aiua @dcbie @ 6 xola
Aedalati narrowed and tapered to blunt apices, style broad,
scarcely curved on apical portion (Fig. 65) .....ss.ccssee. floridana
Plate broad at apex, almost truncate, broadly rounded
CPU) a es Oh ee eae eek ee Lb cake eso es s -xarela
Plate narrower at sae OT BGs VD cae ies wh Ave oa ere oe wee ee 12
Plate elongate, excavated on outer margin just before
apex, style scarcely bent at apex (Figs. 86, 85) ............. pamana
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae D
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
12'
137)
13"
14 (13")
14"
15 (14)
15'
16 (15')
16'
17 (14)
17'
18 (17')
18"
19 (18')
1
20 (19)
20'
21 (19')
Plate short, evenly rounded on outer margin, style |
narrowed apically and curved outwardly (Figs. 131, 130) ........ tura
Aedeagal terminal processes long, slender, with enlarged
discs just before slender apex (Fig. 47)....cccccssscccceeeee vebera
Aedeagal terminal processes tapered to apices, without
enlarcenrentee Pies 14) ih si EUs Rake ies bie da dake es eee s 14
Aedeagal terminal processes each divided or bifid (Fig. 9)......... 15
Aedeagal terminal processes simple, not bifid (Fig. 14) ........... 17
Aedeagal terminal processes bifid at apex. Aedalati wide,
broadly rounded at apex (Fig. 5) ...cceccccccccceeseces limbatipennis
Aedeagal terminal processes bifid near base or at half
their length. Aedalati more slender or bluntly pointed
(Pig8e 9) BO) cs as, cates ie gig la aaa bbe aoe 6 oo vee4 oO
Aedeagal shaft long, slender with a pointed spur on the
inner margin of each terminal process (Fig. 9) ....ceesesceees Sparsa
Aedeagal shaft gradually broadened just before apex,
terminal processes broadly separated with the inner
portion of the divided process curved to center line.
Aedalati very slender (Fig. 80)......ccccccccccces Wvaasens DrODtIOr
Aedeagal shaft slender, straight, with a slight V-shaped
notch (scarcely notched). Style truncate at apex
(Wie BENS 5 VEU oe ie ik x CR a SO ak As os 4 a's casas oe SOR EIE
Aedeagal shaft with a distinct V- or U-shaped excavation
at apex, although the two divided portions may extend
almmostlaterally (Pies 10.1 Obs Bl) cs ee ivel vs se estaccvcce 18
Aedeagal shaft with a small median lobe between apical
processes (Pigs 3h: ADS) vuaeeu iced ta Atha eae aeeccesneese 18
Aedeagal shaft without a median lobe between apical
processes Hiss: BR) fo i cde Cian ea wa pope Win eos beecne's been OF
Aedeagal apical processes long, about one-fifth the
Jenethoot shait. ties, BG 46. 20) is awn bins thas eaves see ee AU
Aedeagal apical processes shorter, not more than one-
seventh the leneth ol saait.( Figs,..01,. 100). oo + se nace diana o0% sce. Ot
Aedeagal shaft with a spur on the dorsal margin at about
four-fifths its length. Aedalati in lateral view very
slender on apical Wale (Pie. 40) és dsl oh od be Cae cae wce sce ones VOlara
Aedeagal shaft without a spur on the dorsal margin.
Aedalati in lateral view broad to pointed apex (Fig. 37)........ velora
Plate broad, rounded at apex, style with long, curved,
outwardly bent apical portion (Fig. 32)......cceccoes Jcosae , CACOReLA
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
21'
22 (18')
24 (22')
24'
25 (24)
25"
26 (25)
26!
27 (26)
at
28 (25')
28)
29 (28)
29!
30 (28')
30"
31 (30)
31'
Plate sloping and bluntly pointed at apex, style with
shorter curved apical portion, apex blunt (Figs. 160, 161) ...... tama
Apical processes short, thick, curved almost laterally
(Figs. 16, 1OV a PO tn enn ear aay ea re a eee Per;
Apical processes of various thickness, extending caudally
or curved laterally and caudally (Figs. 7, 22, 25, 133) ...... seaes 24
Aedalati tapered to slender blunt apices. Style with a thick
blunt curved apical portion (Figs. 16, 18) .....ccceeceees scarlatina
Aedalati thicker at apex. Style witha ‘longer, more
slender apical portion (Figs. 19, 21) ......... Waser a: puncticollis
Aedeagal apical processes separated by a V-shaped
excavation (Pigs. 3, 93; 44,739, 140) soe Pie ens ec oes sone ee
Aedeagal apical processes separated by a broader
curved U-shaped excavation (Figs. 7, 28, 25, 33, 153) .......... 32
Aedeagal apical processes not more than one-tenth the
length Of siialt (Figs, 1, TOS). sos cece es eee eee aes Pes oes 26
Aedeagal apical processes longer, at least ‘one-eighth ‘the |
length of shaft (Figs. 14, 39, 113, 148) ............. ae sare arene 28
Plate broad, rounded apically . pees Sabb ek er el dew <e's ween s 27
Plate narrow, elongate, bluntly pointed apically. ‘Style
with a short narrow apical portion (Figs. 95, 96) ........ .--.guatama
Aedeagal apical processes very short, about one-
eighteenth the length of shaft. Style with a long,
curved apical portion (Figs. 1, 2) ...... OES eu ree ore ber ees .- aenea
Aedeagal apical processes longer, about one-tenth the
length of shaft. Style with apical portion shorter,
narrower, scarcely curved (Figs. 7, 8) ...ceccccoeee .--- pectoralis
Style with apical curved portion broadened on caudal
margin or just before narrowed apex (Figs. 40, 76) .......... ses 29
Style with apical curved portion slender, about parallel
margined, not enlarged before apex (Figs. 15, 115, 150) ......... 30
Aedalati thick and blunt at apex (Fig. 39). ....seccccssees seess SOn0ra
Aedalati tapered to slender pointed apices (Fig. 7 Shs sels wies' quadralaba
Plate eiGinw ate: less than half as wide as long (Fig. 116) ...... vive eee
Plate shorter, more than half as wide as long (Fig. 121) ....... valeda
Plate broad at apex, almost truncate 2.0... 0. ee ct ecw te cee sens a3
Plate bluntly pointed at apex ...... cece eccccccescrecseccrecccces xena
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 7
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
32 (24')
32'
33 (32)
33'
34 (33)
34'
35 (33')
39"
36 (35')
36'
37 (36")
37!
38 (32")
38"
39 (38)
39"
40 (39)
40'
Aedeagal apical processes separated by a broad, rather
shallow U-shaped excavation (Figs. 28, 103, 123, 133) ........... 33
Aedeagal apical processes separated by a deeper, rounded
excavation (Fins, 7, 22, 26, O0)« capuis « disinw «dee caw a came s veh e880
Plate broad at apex, rather broadly rounded (Fig. 146)...........2.. 34
Plate more elongate, narrower at base and bluntly
pointed: .(Wigg, 106 126. Lao. 100). cera cee ceca ca se peus es O0
Aedalati in ventral view with blunt apices; in lateral view
broad to near pointed apex (Figs. 28, 29)......ccsscccceesee Candida
Aedalati in ventral view narrow, tapered on apical half
to slender pointed apices; in lateral view with apical
half tapered to slender apex (Figs. 143, 144) .......... sesee Vandera
Aedalati in lateral view narrow. Plate excavated on
outer margin just before apex (Figs. 124, 126)............... aurata
Aedalati broader on basal half. Plate not distinctly :
excavated on outer margin (Figs. 104, 134, 154)..........ccccee26 36
Plate broadened at middle, almost half as wide as long, :
tapered to apex and bluntly pointed (Fig. 106)................ Vulana
Plate narrower, slightly broadened at middle, width not
exceeding one-third the length (Figs. 136, 156)......cceccccccccee Ot
Style rapidly narrowed at three-fourths its length,
producing a very slender, tapered apical portion.
Plate longest at middie, (Kies, 135, 130)... cies. ewes ceon sc ces Mile
Style with apical portion scarcely narrowed, almost
parallel margined to pointed apex. Plate longest
next.outer margin (Wigs, 150,,1 90). 6 sce neste sans cca emasc es YCRA
Aedeagal apical processes comparatively short, less
than one-twelfth the length of shaft (Figs. 7, 50, 62) .........0222- 39
Aedeagal apical processes comparatively longer, more
than one-ninth the length of shaft (Figs, 22, 25, 33,
133) BI) Beg occ a dibs hk de ok a a ea ce ck 41
Aedalati slender at apex, curved and contiguous
CRISS.” 30: D3 jis bes owls 6c mnie nsd 654 os ees a ea es ccs ee) AO
Aedalati thick at apex, not curved, separated by the
Spex Of shall (Fie. 7). cess eke nets che ck esses ca ee MeCtoralis
Aedeagal apical processes slender, directed caudally.
Style broadened on outer margin just before abruptly
narrowed apical portion (hice. 90, 82) .. sacs ence cen asecescncx ROLIA
Aedeagal apical processes thicker, curved laterally
then caudally. Style not enlarged on inner margin near
anex (Bice, 02, G4) oie cic we vik hc sc eee n ck Osco ct es 6 Coawes yo. Vika
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
— 41 (38')
4)"
42, (41)
42!
43 (41')
43
44 (43')
44!
45 (6')
45!
46 (45)
46'
47 (46!)
AT
48 (47')
48'
49 (45')
Aedeagal apical processes thickened at base, or with
short spurs on inner margin at base (Figs. 25, 33) ....cccccccccee 42
Aedeagal apical processes not thickened at base
CPi ey Say) CEG e LO ie ea Cie iistew |b POR IVE Kb bee nb evi tee scee 48
Aedalati in lateral view broad to near slender apex
BAG 20) va a dara Oo Wee RU ie da We a ae CES e dee Seeces eee eS 6 ROUNE
Aedalati in lateral view narrow, about the same width
as shaft to slender apex (Fig. 34)....ccccccccccccesseee punctipennis
Style with apical portion curved and with a sharp-
pointed apex (Fig. OV lees boa a ee UN oe he CON ee bees ce eeedees tena
Style not sharp-pointed at apex (Figs. 114, 120) .......cccccoee cane 48
Plate three-fifths as broad as long, outer margin
convey Curved (Fig. 121) is ie Peed es tic cee c ce ceecsdssaa es VALCOR
Plate less than half as broad as long, outer margin
concavely rounded just before bluntly pointed apex
Ce ERO) SU eae euler re eee eee eee eee beh eee oe ets ce ee, SODS
Aedeagal shaft distinctly shorter than aedalati
(Figs. 11s D3, 29, 69) @eeeeeseeoeeseosvpeeeeeeeesoeoaeeeeseeeeeeeeeee ee @ 46
Aedeagal shaft only slightly longer than aedalati
(Figs. 3, 198, 163, 168, 173) eeeeoeeaeeoeoeeeseeeeseeesceesoeoeaeseeoeneeseeeee ese sd 49
Aedeagal shaft about two-thirds as long as aedalati.
Aedalati straight, slender, tapered in lateral view
CBee OO) oe rire ook cc oak Sec ce Cee es oe Ves ooh cae es OCCINGE
Aedeagal shaft more than nine-tenths as long as
aedalati. Aedalati not slender nor tapered to sharp-
pothted apices Pies, 11; 557 69) a ee i ie I
Aedeagal shaft with a deep V-shaped notch separating the
divergent terminal processes. Aedalati straight,
tapered, blunt atapices, (FIg. Tho. lov. case sc sec csecces se Limonea
Aedeagal shaft with a U-shaped excavation separating the
apical processes. Aedalati curved at apex (Figs. 53, 69)......... 48
Aedeagal shaft excavation narrow, apical processes
extending caudally. Style with curved apical portion
short, blunt at apex. (Figs. 53, 55).......csccceeeseceee rubrapuncta
Aedeagal shaft excavation broader, apical processes a
curving laterally and caudally. Style with apical
curved portion longer, tapered to a sharp pointed
BDEN ChIGS. GO, Thi veacas Ge is eke eek eee ees sabe vecee cea) COME
Aedalati thick at apex, aedeagal shaft with a short
V-shaped notch at apex (Fig. ERR asa aR ciel ha URL Sapa iehe ising Gala tN rubida
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 9
Key to Species of Subgenus Ponana
49' Aedalati slender, tapered apically (Figs. 108, 163, 168, 173) ....... 20
90 (49') Plate bluntly pointed apically (Figs. 111, 166, 171) ................ 51
50' Plate broad, rounded at apex. (fic. L7G)... bss cees cn eames cae cess tamala
51 (49) Style slightly curved apically, blunt at apex (Fig. 108)............ pana
5" Style more strongly curved on apical portion, sharp-
POINbed-Al Alex (Pies. ta. LT) vie ce a bas s Depa epee sok es a2
52 (51') Plate concavely excavated on outer margin just before
harrow, Winn Jaen CHIE LOGE i. eins boon ae were oui c s wee dese ae yera
D2" Plate evenly rounded on outer margin, not excavated
Pes AT bh wtsimctsl ao eka ais Ole Faw, Ch ee ee mexella
53 (31) Aedeagal apical processes long and slender .........ccceceees citrina
D3! Aedeagal apical processes formed by a V-shaped
excavation at apex, processes stout at base, tapered
{0 SIGNGCY DOUMEAADICEE, os odoin wislsy et od Fhe ene ba eee vedala
Ponana (Ponana) aenea DeLong
(Figs. 1-2)
Ponana aenea DeLong, 1942, p. 94.
A yellow species marked with brown and flecks of red. Length, 8 mm.
Crownrather strongly produced, apex rounded, more than half as long on
middle as basal width between the eyes.
Color: Yellow, tinged with brown. Forewings pale to dark brownish, some-
times with reddish flecks as in scarlatina.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles produced and rounded,
between which the posterior margin is concavely excavated either side of a pair
of short, broadly rounded median lobes separated by a short median notch. Male
style broad, rather deeply concavely notched on ventral margin at about the
middle, angularly notched on dorsal margin a little farther apically, decidedly
narrowed and produced forming a thick finger-like process directed outwardly
and pointed at apex. Aedeagus viewed ventrally with the aedalati tapered at
apices. Shaft slender, bifid at apex with very short apical processes.
The style and aedeagus are both excellent characters for separating this
species from scarlatina.
Type: Holotype male from Pennsylvania in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: In addition to Pennsylvania it is known to occur in Ohio, Maryland,
North Carolina, Missouri, Kansas, and Minnesota.
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) rubida DeLong
(Figs. 3-4)
Ponana rubida DeLong, 1942, p. 95.
A yellow species washed with brown. Length, 9-9.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, a little more than half as long on middle as basal
width between the eyes.
Color: Yellowish washed with brown. Forewings brownish with dark brown
pigment markings resembling cross veins. These are more abundant on claval
area just back of apex of scutellum.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum roundedly produced, shallowly broadly
notched at apex, slightly sinuate about halfway on either side. Male style even
broader than in aenea, not so deeply notched on either ventral or dorsal edges,
and with apex shorter, thicker, and more blunt at apex than in that species.
Aedeagus with the shaft narrow, constricted on dorsal side, then bifurcate and
broadened. The ventral portion forms a sheath which is not constricted.
Type: Holotype male from Wisconsin in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: It is known to occur in Wisconsin, Nebraska, Iowa, Ohio, and
Pennsylvania. :
Ponana (Ponana) limbatipennis (Spang. )
Figs. 5-6
Gypona limbatipennis Spangberg, 1878, p. 47.
A dark-winged species with pale costal margins. Length, 8.75-9.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than half as long as basal width between
eyes.
Color: Brownish yellow. Crown and pronotum usually unmarked. Scutellum
smoky. Forewings usually smoky to black, apical half often paler with dark veins,
costal margin broadly yellowish.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin slightly sinuate,
and broadly, shallowly notched at middle. Male style slender, rather shallowly
notched on ventral and dorsal margins, abruptly narrowed just before apex, the
apical tip rather slender; finger-like apex curved to a point on inner margin.
Aedeagus with the aedalati narrowed just before apex with apices blunt, divergent.
Shaft slender, slightly enlarged at apex, median portion excavated with a slight
median tooth at base. Each arm forming the excavation is bifid at apex, the
outer tooth shorter than the inner tooth. The aedeagus character will easily
separate this from all allied species.
Type: Holotype male from Illinois in the Stockholm Museum.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 11
Remarks: In addition to Dlinois, it is known to occur in Ohio and Iowa.
The type has been examined. |
Ponana (Ponana) pectoralis (Spang. )
(Figs. 7-8) :
Gypona pectoralis Spangberg, 1878, p. 46.
Gypona albimarginata Woodworth, 1887, p. 31.
Gypona bimaculata Woodworth, 1887, p. 3l.
Gypona woodworthi Van Duzee, 1915, p. 389.
A yellowish brown species with dark coloration on the corium and clavus
of forewings. Length, 10 mm.
Crown broadly produced, more than one-half as long on middle as basal
width between the eyes.
Color: Yellow washed with brown. Disc of pronotum darker. Scutellum
darker on anterior half. Forewings yellowish; subhyaline claval area more
smoky and with brownish spots on corium and clavus.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin broadly, rather
shallowly notched at middle with a rounded lobe either side which is usually
slightly sinuate at middle. Male style broad, deeply concavely notched on inner
margin, then enlarged and sloped to a rather thick finger-like apex which is
_ formed by a deep angular notch on inner margin. Aedeagus with apices of |
aedalati blunt and divergent; shaft slender, enlarged at apex, rather deeply
notched forming a pair of divergent pointed tips. )
Type: Holotype female from Illinois in the Stockholm Museum.
Remarks: The species is known to occur in Ohio, Illinois, Kansas,
Mississippi, Texas, and the District of Columbia.
Ponana (Ponana) sparsa DeLong |
(Figs. 9-10)
Ponana sparsa DeLong, 1942, p. 103.
A greenish yellow species with a few dark markings. Length, 7.5-8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, twice as wide between eyes at base as median
length.
Color: Yellowish green, with indication of the transverse rows of black
spots on forewings.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with a broad shallow notch at center
and a shallow concave excavation about halfway either side, giving the posterior
margin a lobate appearance. Male style sinuate on both margins, broadened
just before the produced, narrowed, apical portion which is long, gently curved
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
dorsally, and sharp-pointed at apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati broadened just
before blunt, narrowed apices. Shaft slender, widened at apex, and deeply ex-
cavated with a V-shaped notch which forms a pair of long, slender divergent
processes each of which bears a sharp-pointed spur on inner margin at abou
half its length. :
Type: Holotype male from Florida in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: It is known to occur only in Florida.
Ponana (Ponana) limonea Ball and Reeves
(Figs. 11-13)
Ponana scarlatina var. limonea Ball and Reeves, 1937, p. 489.
A smoky greenish species with a well-produced crown. Length, 10 mm. )
Crown strongly, bluntly produced, more than half as long on middle as basal
width between eyes at base.
Color: Smoky green; crown and pronotum often brighter green.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum almost truncate, with a broad, shallow
median notch at middle. Male style rather broad with a produced, rounded lobe
on dorsal margin not far from apex from which the margin is concavely rounded
to form a narrow, produced apical process which is pointed at tip. Aedeagus with
aedalati tapered to bluntly pointed apices. Shaft long, slender, enlarged at apex,
with a pair of long, slender, tapered, pointed processes separated by a deep
V-shaped excavation.
Type: Holotype male from Ohio in the Ball Collection, U. S. National
Museum.
Remarks: Known to occur only in Florida and Ohio.
Ponana (Ponana) citrina (Spang. )
Figs. 14-15
Gypona citrina Spangberg, 1878, p. 45.
A yellowish species tinged with orange and often with black spots on crown.
Length, 8-9.75 mm. :
Crown broadly rounded, more than twice as wide as median length.
Color: Green to yellow, often tinged with orange with small black spots
usually arranged in three transverse rows extending across forewings.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum almost truncate, faintly notched at
middle and slightly sinuate either side, causing a faint lobate appearance.
Male style rather broad with a shallow, broadly rounded excavation on ventral
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 13
or inner margin, a little beyond middle; also notched on dorsal margin beyond
which it is widened by a rounded lobe to the slender, produced, narrow process
at apex which has a sharp-pointed tip. Aedeagus with the aedalati tapered to
convergent, bluntly pointed apices. Shaft slender, broadened at apex, deeply
excavated by a V-shaped notch, thus producing a pair of divergent, pointed,
slender processes at tip.
Type: Holotype male from Texas in the Stockholm Museum.
Remarks: This species is reported only for Texas.
Ponana (Ponana) scarlatina (Fitch)
Figs. 16-18)
Gypona scarlatina Fitch, 1851, p. 57.
Gypona irrorella Spangberg, 1878, p. 63.
Gypona spadix DeLong, 1918, p. 235.
Gypona rodora Ball, 1920, p. 96.
A yellowish brown species completely dotted with bright red spots in well-
marked specimens. Length of male 8.5 mm, female 9 mm.
Head narrow, crown broadly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes
at base as median length.
| Color: Varying from buff to brown, and usually marked with red spots on
all portions of the dorsal surface. Veins frequently red. The degree and in-
tensity of coloration are quite variable.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with well-produced, rounded lateral
angles between which the posterior margin is concavely excavated either side
of a broad median produced lobe which is slightly notched at middle. Male
style with apical portion narrowed but almost parallel margined to apex which
is rather broad and rounded and with a short point on inner apex. Aedeagus
in ventral view with a rather broad shaft which is tapered at apex and bears a
pair of short processes which extend laterally and are tapered to pointed
apices. The aedalati are tapered to slender apices.
The male styles and aedeagus will easily separate this species which is
variable in color.
Type: Holotype female from New York in the New York State Museum.
Remarks: Known to occur in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois,
Wisconsin, Ontario, Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, and Arizona.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) puncticollis (Spang. )
(Figs. 19-2
Gypona puncticollis Spangberg, 1878, p. 63.
Gypona sanguinolenta Spangberg, 1878, p. 63.
Gypona grisea Spangberg, 1878, p. 63.
Gypona proscripta Fowler, 1903, p. 309.
A pale brownish species with four large round spots just behind anterior
margin of pronotum and with forewings heavily marked with brownish irrora-
tions. Length, 9 mm.
Crown rather strongly produced and rounded, more than half as long on
middle as basal width between the eyes.
Color: Pale brownish pronotum with four round spots on submargin; crown
and pronotum often with fine brown punctures which appear reddish in some
specimens. Forewings generally marked with small round brownish spots. In
addition there are heavy brownish areas arranged in two broken transverse
bands across clavus. The intensity of these bands will vary.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with produced, rounded lateral angles
between which the posterior margin is concavely excavated either side of a
broad median lobe produced beyond the lateral angles and slightly notched at
middle. Male style broad, narrowed toward apex, and constricted near apex
to form a thick, finger-like, curved tip which is bluntly pointed. Aedeagus in
ventral view with the aedalati blunt at apex and rounded. The shaft long and
slender with broadened apex from which arise two lateral processes which are
rigidly fastened together and form a semicircular band, with the apices curved
ventrally and sharp pointed.
Type: Holotype female from Texas in the Stockholm Museum.
- Remarks: Known to occur in Texas, Florida, and Illinois.
-Ponana (Ponana) tena, n. sp.
(Figs. 22-24)
Resembling vedala in form and appearance but paler in color and with dif-
ferent genitalia. Length of male 9 mm, female 9.5 mm.
Crown with broadly rounded margin, twice as wide between yee at base
as median length.
Color: Crown pale yellow unmarked. Pronotum pale yellow with scattered,
minute, brown, punctate spots on disc and posterior portion. Four round black
spots across anterior margin, one behind outer margin of each eye and one be-
hind each ocellus. Scutellum yellow to pale brown, basal angles a little darker.
Forewings yellowish, subhyaline with a few scattered pale brown markings. A
brown spot on commissure at end of each claval vein. :
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles broadly rounded,
between which the posterior margin is broadly, shallowly excavated either
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 15
side of a broadly, convexly rounded, median lobe which is more than half the
width of segment and is produced beyond the length of the lateral angles. Male
plates broad, more than twice as long as broad, almost parallel margined,
apex broadly rounded. Style broadened, then gradually narrowed at two-thirds
its length; apical third narrow, curved, with a sharp-pointed apex. Aedeagus
with the aedalati quite broad at middle, tapered to narrow apices. Shaft narrow,
with two long, stout apical processes which curve laterally and extend apically.
Pygofer with a narrow curved apex.
: Holotype male: Mexcala, Gro., Mexico, X-22-41, K-247, DeLong, Good,
Caldwell, and Plummer. Allotype: Acatlan del Rio, Guerrero, VIII-10-1930,
at light, Jose Parra. Paratypes: 15 males, Iguala, Gro., Mexico, IX-11-39,
DeLong; 1 male, Zimapan, Hgo, Mexico, IX-26-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell,
and Plummer; 1 male, Mexcala, Gro., Mexico, 10-2-45, Balock, DeLong, and
Hershberger; 1 male, Iguala, Gro., Mexico, XI-15-46, E. C. Van Dyke; 6 males,
Acatlan del Rio, Gro., Mexico, Balsas River, VII-1930, Jose Parra; 1 male,
Santo Tomas, Gro., Mexico, VIII-1930, Jose Parra. Holotype, allotype, and
paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum,
the California Academy of Science Collection, the Stockholm Museum, and the
North Carolina State University Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) aquila (Gibson)
(Figs. 25-27)
Gypona aquila Gibson, 1919, p. 99.
A pale yellowish species heavily marked with brown. Length, 8-8.5 mm.
Crown short, narrow, broadly rounded, more than twice as wide between
eyes as median length.
Color: Pale yellow; a round black spot behind each ocellus on base of
crown, one behind each on anterior margin of pronotum, and a spot behind
each eye on anterior portion of pronotum, brown. Disc and posterior half of
pronotum densely punctured with brown. Basal angles of scutellum brown.
Forewing marked by numerous small brownish irregular spots which are more
concentrated on clavus.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin concavely
rounded between lateral margins to a broad, produced median lobe, more than
one-third the width of the segment, which is slightly notched at middle forming
a pair of proximal rounded lobes which are produced decidedly beyond the
lateral angles. Male style broad at base, rapidly narrowed, and abruptly bent
outwardly on apical third with an anteriorly bent and pointed tip. Aedeagus
with aedalati broadened at middle and tapered to blunt apices. Shaft broadened
to form a pair of heavy apical processes which taper to pointed divergent tips.
Type: Holotype female from Arizona, inthe U. S,. National Museum,
Remarks: It has been reported only for Arizona.
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) candida (Van Duzee)
(Figs. 28-30)
Gypona candida Van Duzee, 1923, p. 175.
A pale species marked with brown spots and ramose pigment lines on fore-
wings. Length, 7mm. |
Crown bluntly produced, aie twice as wide between eyes at middle as
median length.
Color: Pale yellow; a black spot behind each ocellus on basal margin of
crown. Pronotum with small brown punctures on disc and two spots behind each
eye on a median transverse line. Forewings cream-white with veins and ramose
pigment markings pale brown. :
Genitalia: Male style narrowed beyond middle and produced, curved out-
wardly and with a pointed apex on anterior margin. Aedeagus with aedalati
curved inwardly and narrowed to bluntly pointed apices. Shaft widened at apex
bearing a short slender process on each outer margin. In lateral view the.
aedalati are broad, curved, and narrowed to pointed apices. Plate short and
broad.
Type: Holotype male from Mexico (Lower California) in the California
Academy of Science Collection.
Remarks: This species is recorded only for Lower California.
Ponana (Ponana) cacozela (Gibson)
(Figs. 31-32)
Gypona cacozela Gibson, 1919, p. 94.
A yellowish species with transverse rows of dark spots. Length, 7-8.5 mm.
Crown broad, about twice as wide between eyes at base as median length.
Color: Yellow tinged with orange, brown spots on forewings usually arranged
in three transverse rows.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin almost truncate
either side of a short median notch. Male style rather slender with a broadly
rounded, produced lobe on ventral or inner margin beyond middle. Apical
fourth narrowed, sharply curved dorsally or outwardly, sickle-shaped with
apex pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati bluntly pointed. Shaft slender, enlarged
at apex, and deeply notched with a short, broad tooth at apex of notch, sunken
between a pair of long, slender, pointed apical processes.
Type: Holotype female from Texas, in the U. S. National Museum.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 17
Ponana (Ponana) punctipennis (Stal)
(Figs. 33-35
Gypona punctipennis Stal, 1864, p. 82.
Gypona curiata Gibson, 1919, p. 97.
A pale brown species heavily marked with small brownish punctures.
Length, 8-8.5 mm.
Crown bluntly produced, more than half as long on middle as basal width
between eyes.
Color: Pale brown; a spot behind each ocellus on anterior portion of pronotum
brown and fine punctures on disc and posterior portion of pronotum, brown. Fore-
wings with veins margined with small punctures and numerous spots on apical
third, brown.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum almost truncate on posterior margin,
slightly angularly excavated to a broad, slight median notch. Male style rather
narrow, apical fourth strongly curved outwardly and pointed on anterior margin.
Aedeagus rather short; aedalati tapered at apices, convergent, and with narrowed
blunt tips. Shaft with a pair of heavy, elongate, divergent, claw-like processes
arising at apex which are separated at the point of origin by a broad concave
notch.
Type: Holotype female from Mexico in the Stockholm Museum.
Remarks: It has been collected also in Arizona.
Ponana (Ponana) velora, n. sp.
(Figs. 36-38)
Resembling tama in form and appearance but darker in color and with dif-
ferent male genital structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal width
between eyes.
Color: Crown dull yellow. Pronotum yellow with several scattered minute
dark brown punctate spots on disc and posterior half. A series of four definite
dark spots across anterior portion. Two area little larger, one posterior to
each ocellus. A smaller round spot is behind each eye. Anirregular brown
spot is on lateral margin close to each eye and a few irregular paler markings
are along anterior margin. Scutellum pale yellow, a spot in each basal angle
dark brown. Forewings pale brown, heavily marked with numerous brown spots
and blotches. Veins on anterior two-thirds margined with minute brown punctate
spots.
Genitalia: Male plates widest at about two-thirds their length, then con-
cavely narrowed on outer margin to form a narrower but rather broadly rounded
apex. Style in lateral view with a slender tapered and outwardly curved apical
fifth, apex blunt, spoon-like. Aedeagus with the aedalati distinctly widened at
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
middle and tapered at both ends, apical portions sharp-pointed. Shaft slender
with a prominent terminal process arising on each side at apex curving out-
wardly, then apically and extending well beyond the tip of the aedalati. Pygofer
in lateral view tapered to a bluntly pointed apex.
Holotype male: Mexico 2499, Collection, C. F. Baker. Paratype: 1 male,
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, VIII-30-1944 on foliage Eupatorium adenophorum,
N. L. H. Krauss, P. 283. This is apparently the same as the holotype. Holotype
and paratype in the U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) sonora Ball
(Figs. 39-40)
Ponana sonora Ball, 1935, p. 502.
A pale yellow species with produced crown and four large black spots on
anterior margin of pronotum., Length, 8 mm.
Crown almost angularly produced, apex rounded, more than one-half as
long at middle as basal width between the eyes. Pronotum decidedly wider
than head.
Color: Pale yellow, with a row of four round black spots on the anterior
portion of pronotum. Forewings pale, scarcely marked, with a small black
spot on each at base.
Genitalia: Female last ventral segment feebly bisinuate. Male style sud-
denly narrowed near apex and curved outwardly to form a short produced tip.
Broadened on caudal margin of curved portion, apex blunt and narrowed.
Aedeagus rather short and broad; aedalati broad, tips broad, convergent, pointed
on inner margins. Shaft broadened at apex to form a pair of long, slender, di-
vergent pointed processes which are separated by a deep, V-shaped notch.
Type: Holotype female from Arizona, in the Ball Collection, U. S. National
Museum.
Remarks: This species is known only from Arizona.
Ponana (Ponana) vinula (Stal)
(Figs. 41-43)
Gypona vinula Stal, 1864, p. 81.
A small yellowish species with a pair of black spots on the anterior portion
of crown at base, sutural portion of clavus pink to pale reddish. Length, 7.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Dull yellow; a black spot behind each ocellus on anterior portion of
pronotum, Anterior portion of scutellum brown. Crown with a large brown
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 649
spot on disc. Sutural border of clavus at apex of scutellum pink to pale reddish
with brown mottling.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum sinuate either side of a median, narrow
incision. Male style with apical fifth narrowed and sharply bent outwardly, apex
bluntly pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati blunt, convergent. Shaft slender, broad-
ened near apex producing a pair of long, slender, divergent processes with a
short sunken tooth between them at base. In lateral view the aedalati are decided-
ly broadened at middle, curved dorsally, and pointed at apices.
Type: Holotype male from Mexico in the Stockholm Museum.
Remarks: This species is known only from Mexico.
Ponana (Ponana) volara, n. sp.
(Fics. 44-46)
Resembling yena in general form and appearance but with different male
genital structures. Length of male 7.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, about two-thirds as long at middle as basal width
between eyes. :
Color: Crown pale, dull yellow, with a small round spot at base behind
each ocellus. Pronotum same tint of yellow with disc and posterior half rather
thickly set with minute brown punctate spots. Anterior portion with six black
spots. Two are behind each eye, the smaller of these is along the lateral
margin; two are anterior, median, one just behind each basal spot on crown.
Scutellum dull yellow, basal portion darker. Forewings appearing brownish
yellow with rows of minute brown punctate spots margining or parallel to the
veins, extending to apex of clavus. Apical veins and cross veins brown.
Several small brown spots on wings; two between sectors, a row of six or more
just anterior to claval vein, three or more on clavus along commissure.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, almost three times as long as broad;
widest at two-thirds its length, then sloping to a bluntly pointed apex. Style
tapered from middle to form a narrow curved apical eighth which is bluntly
pointed. Aedeagus with the aedalati broad at middle tapering to slender,
curved apices. Shaft broadened near apex with a pair of long, slender, ter-
minal processes which are separated at base and slightly divergent. Pygofer
with a narrow blunt apex.
Holotype male: Vergel Chis, Mexico, V-19-35, A. Dampf. Paratypes:
1 male, Limpia Creek Canyon, Texas, IX-1952, at light, Davis Mts., B. Malkin;
4 males, Vergel Chis, 1 each, VI-3-35, VI-5-35, VI-25-35, and Finca, Aurora,
VI-18-35, all collected by A. Dampf; 1 male, Zoyaltepec, Oaxaca, Mexico,
VII-6-1932, D. Quiroz; 1 male, Cordoba Ver., Mexico, Sept., 1930; 1 male,
Tierra Blanca Ver., IX-17-1924. Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection, paratype in the California Academy of Science Collection, the
U. S. National Museum, and the Stockholm Museum.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) vebera, n. sp.
Sie Ores eo)
Resembling xila in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 7.5 mm, female 8 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than half as long on middle as basal width
between the eyes.
Color: Crown pale brownish yellow. Pronotum same as crown with the
four round black spots across anterior portion; a spot near lateral margin just
behind each eye and a spot near anterior margin directly behind each ocellus.
Scutellum pale brownish yellow, basal angles a little darker. Forewing same
tint as scutellum with two spots on discal area, each side and three or more
spots along commissure of clavus. Cross veins of apical cells brown.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with rounded lateral angles between
which the posterior margin is shallowly excavated either side of a pair of
slightly produced median lobes which are about the same length as the lateral
angles separated by a short, broad, V-shaped notch and combined, are more
than half the width of the segment. Male plates elongate, more than three
times as long as broad, apex bluntly pointed. Style narrowed at three-fourths
its length to form a narrow curved apical portion with a tooth-like spine at
apex. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened at middle and tapered to pointed
apices which curve inwardly. Shaft with two long thread-like apical processes
which are widely separated and diverge rapidly. Pygofer with narrow blunt
apex.
Holotype male: Carmen Camp, Mexico, 1-27-39, A. Dampf. Allotype
female: Same data as holotype. Paratypes: 1 male, Same as holotype; 1 male,
Morales, Guatemala, October, 1930, J. J. White; 4 males, Vergel Chis.,
Mexico, one each, V-21-35, Mrs. Dampf; V-20-35, A. Dampf; V-30-35,
A. Dampf, and VI-4-35, A. Dampf. Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the
DeLong Collection. Paratype in the North Carolina State University Collection,
the U. S. National Museum, and the Stockholm Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) xella, n. sp.
(Figs. 50-52)
Resembling volara in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Crown golden yellow. Pronotum dull yellow with numerous minute
brown punctate spots on disc and posterior half. A row of four brown spots
across anterior portion; a spot behind each eye and a spot near anterior margin
behind each ocellus. Scutellum brownish yellow with basal angles darker anda
large pale yellow spot at apex. Forewings appearing pale brown with darker
spots on claval margin along apical portion of scutellum and paler spots poste-
riorly on clavus; a larger spot on disc; smaller spots on apical portion of wings;
apical cross veins, brown.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae ai
Genitalia: Male plates more than twice as long as broad, apex broad,
truncate. Style rapidly narrowed at four-fifths its length, apical fifth narrow,
curved outwardly, sharp-pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened at middle,
apices narrow, curved inwardly. Shaft with two short, slender, separated
apical processes. Pygofer constricted just before apex which is narrow and
bluntly pointed.
Holotype male: Santa Anita Chis., Mexico, at light, II-25-1931, Jose
Parra collector, in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) rubrapuncta DeLong
(Figs. 53-55) ~
Ponana rubrapuncta DeLong, 1942, p. 99.
A yellow species marked with small red spots. Length, 7.5-8 mm.
Crown broadly, roundedly produced, more than one-half longer on middle
than basal width between eyes.
Color: Yellowish; crown and pronotum rather densely covered with small
red spots. Forewings ringed with brown with the three transverse rows of
black spots as in citrina, rather evenly covered with small reddish blotches.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum rather well-produced; posterior margin
broadly, sinuately, and shallowly excavated with a broad shallow notch at middle.
Male style bearing a rounded, produced lobe on ventral or inner margin not far
from apex and a smaller rounded, produced lobe on the dorsal or outer margin.
Apical portion narrowed, curved dorsally, forming a finger-like process with a
sharply pointed apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati narrowed near apex and pro-
duced as slender, bluntly tipped apices. Shaft with a deep, narrow, U-shaped
excavation at apex formed by a long, slender, sharply pointed process on each
side. The genitalia will easily separate this species from those closely related
in the citrina group.
Type: Holotype male from Florida in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: Known to occur only in Florida.
Ponana (Ponana) cincta, n. sp.
(Figs. 56-58)
A well marked species resembling quadralaba in general form but with
darker markings and with different male genitalia. Length of male 8 mm.
Crown produced but scarcely angled, three-fifths as long at middle as
basal width between the eyes. )
Color: Yellow marked with orange and brown. Crown and pronotum
orange, ocelli and four round spots on pronotum black. A spot on lateral
margin of pronotum at half its length behind each eye, a pair on anterior
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
margin, and one behind each ocellus. Scutellum orange marked with brown and
with black spots on anterior portion. Forewings yellow tinted with orange on
anterior half. A dark brownish band extending from base of wing along scutellum,
then along commissure to apex of wing, gradually widened to form a cross band
at middle, which extends to costa where it is quite narrow, with darker brown
spots on discal cross veins.
Genitalia: Male plates rather broad, rather strongly curved on inner margin
to form a bluntly pointed apex at outer margin. Style in ventral view appearing
slender and only slightly, broadly excavated on inner margin. Apical third
narrow, curved outwardly, and tapered to a pointed apex. Aedeagus with the
aedalati short, tapered from near base and with narrow blunt apices. Shaft
narrowed just before apex and bearing a pair of terminal spine-like processes
which extend laterally and caudally.
Holotype male: Iguala, Gro., Mexico, 9-11-39, D. M. DeLong collector.
Paratypes: 2 males, Same as holotype; 2 males, Iguala, Gro., Mexico, X-25-41,
DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer. Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection, the U. S. National Museum, and the Stockholm Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) occlusa (Gibson)
(Figs. 59-61)
Gypona occlusa Gibson, 1919, p. 94.
A small, lemon-yellow species with a pair of black spots on anterior por-
tion of pronotum. Length, 6-6.5 mm,
Crown short, broadly rounded, twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Lemon-yellow to pale green with a small black spot behind each
ocellus on anterior portion of pronotum.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with produced, rounded lateral angles
between which the posterior margin is narrowly roundedly excavated either
side of a broad median lobe produced to about the length of the lateral angles.
Male style with a definitely sickle-shaped portion which is narrowed and is
curved outwardly. Aedeagus with the aedalati tapered to pointed apices. Shaft
short, greatly exceeded by the lateral pieces and notched at apex, forming a
pair of separated terminal teeth.
Type: Holotype female from Texas, in the U. S. National Museum.
Remarks: In addition to the type, it is known to occur in Texas and Mexico.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 23
Ponana (Ponana) yura, n. sp.
(Figs. 62-64)
Resembling fortina in form and general appearance but with different male
genital structures, Length of male 7 mm, female 8 mm. |
Crown broadly rounded anteriorly, twice as wide between the eyes at base
as median length. 3
Color: Yellow with a few dark markings. Crown yellow unmarked. Pro-
notum yellow with four black spots, one on lateral margin just behind each eye
and a pair along anterior margin, one behind each ocellus. Forewings yellow,
central and apical costal area hyaline. Faint color markings, both light and ©
dark, along commissure of basal two-thirds of clavus.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles strongly produced
and broadly curved to posterior margin which is broadly shallowly excavated
each side of a median produced lobe; lobe is shallowly broadly notched at apex.
The lobe is about one-third the width of segment and not produced to length of
lateral angles. Male plates rather broad, widest at middle, convexly curved
on outer margin, apices broad, almost truncate. Style broadly excavated at
about middle on inner margin, apical fourth bent outwardly, and tapered to a
pointed apex. Aedeagus with aedalati elongate rather slender, tapered to pointed
apices which curve inwardly. The shaft is slender, elongate, and abruptly broad-
ened at apex to form a broad truncate tip which is at least five times the width
of shaft.
Holotype male: Vergel, Chiapas, Mexico, 1938. Allotype female: Same
data as holotype. Paratypes: 3 females and 6 males, Same as holotype; 1 male,
Vergel, Chiapis, V-19-35. Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong Collection.
Paratype in the U. S. National Museum Collection, the Stockholm Museum, the
North Carolina State University Collection, and the California Academy of
Science Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) floridana DeLong
(Fig. 65)
Ponana floridana DeLong, 1942, p. 102.
A yellow species with black spots on the pronotum. Length of male 7 mm,
female 8 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, a little more than twice as wide between eyes at
base as median length.
Color: Straw yellow; ocelli large, dark; pronotum with four black spots
in a semicircle on submargin. Forewings with traces of the three rows of
spots as seen in citrina.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum almost truncate, slightly bisinuate
with a slight notch at middle. Male style narrow, broadly, shallowly exca-
vated on ventral or inner margin, scarcely narrowed to apex which is rapidly
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
narrowed to a blunt, rounded apex. Aedeagus with aedalati narrowed at apex
and blunt. Shaft rather rapidly enlarged and deeply excavated by a V-shaped
notch forming on either side a long, strongly tapered pointed process.
Type: Holotype male from Florida, in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: Known to occur in Florida and Texas.
Ponana (Ponana) divergens, n. sp.
(Figs. 66-68)
Resembling pectoralis in color markings and general appearance but with
different male genital structures. Length of male 7.5 mm,
Crown produced and broadly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes
at base as median length.
Color: Yellow tinged with green and with darker markings. Crown yellow
unmarked. Pronotum yellowish with four small round black spots on anterior
portion; one is posterior to each eye but not on lateral margin; two are close
to anterior margin, one behind each ocellus. The disc is peppered with minute
brown flecks. Pronotum pale brown. The basal angles are darker and the
- apical angle is paler in color. Forewings yellowish. The claval area next the
scutellum and extending back along commissure almost to middle of clavus,
pale brown with darker brown spots. A cross row of spots at middle of clavus
with a large brown spot on disc. A small brown spot on the anterior cross
vein between the sectors.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, narrowed at middle, slightly wider at
two-thirds their length then gradually tapered to rather narrow, blunt apices.
Style appearing almost parallel margined for about two-thirds its length, then
slightly narrower with the apical sixth more narrowed and bent obliquely out-
wardly and abruptly narrowed to a pointed apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati
diverging near their middle, narrowing at three-fourths their length to slender
sharp-pointed apices which curve outwardly then caudally. The shaft is narrow
and bears a pair of short spine-like processes at the apex which extend out-
wardly from the tip.
Holotype male: Chiapis, Mexico, Alfonse Dampf collector, in the DeLong
Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) chia apa 1 n. sp.
(Figs. 123-127)
Resembling divergens in form and general appearance with more intense
color markings and with different male genital structures. Length of male
7.9 mm, female 8 mm.
Crown broadly, roundingly produced, more than twice as wide between
eyes at base as median length.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 20
Color: Crown yellow unmarked, pronotum yellow with two round black spots
near anterior margin, one behind each ocellus. Scutellum with basal angles
brown, apical angle white. Forewings yellow tinged with green with a broad
dark brown stripe extending from scutellum along inner margin of wings when
closed to and covering all but first apical cell. The stripe begins along the sides
of scutellum, is gradually widened to disc of wing at about middle of clavus and
continued broad to apex of wing.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles rounded to posterior
margin which is slightly and broadly concavely excavated each side of a produced
median lobe which is about one-fourth the width of the segment, slightly notched
at middle and produced beyond the lateral angles. Male plates as long as aedeagus.
Styles concavely narrowed on outer margin, then bent outwardly at a right angle
to form a long narrow apical portion which is sharp-pointed at apex. Aedeagus
with the aedalati rather constricted at three-fourths their length and tapered to
slender apices. The shaft is long and slender, slightly widened at apex with a
spine-like process on each outer margin, directed caudally.
Holotype male: Chiapis, Mexico, 1938, Alfonse Dampf. Allotype: Vergal
Chiapis, Mexico, 6-3-35. Paratypes: 4 males, same as holotype, Dampf; 2
females, Coatepec, Vero, Mexico, K-342, 10-14-45, Shaw, DeLong; 1 male,
Costa Rica; 1 male, Cerro Punta, Panama, 12-23-39, J. G. Sanders; 1 male,
San Salvador, 3-16-53. Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong Col-
lection. Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum, the North Carolina State
University Collection, the Stockholm Museum, and the California oe of
Science Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) xola, n. sp.
: (Figs. 72- 7A)
Resembling vandera in form and appearance but darker in color and with
different male genital structures. Length of male 9 mm, female 9.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal width
between eyes.
Color: Somewhat variable; crown pale brown; pronotum pale brown, disc
usually paler with numerous brown punctate spots. Usually with a dark spot
on lateral margin and a small round spot proximal to it behind eye on each
side, with paler brown markings along anterior margin. Scutellum yellow to
pale brown, basal angles and in some specimens entire base, brown. Fore-
wings pale brown with claval area along commissure marked with dark brown
spots except a white spot on middle of clavus. A few brown spots on other
portions of wing; veins on apical half margined with brown. Costal areas may
be tinted with red.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles slightly produced
and rounded between which the posterior margin is slightly broadly excavated
either side of a produced, broadly rounded median lobe which is notched at
middle by a short, broad, V-shaped notch. Male plates rather narrow, elon-
gate, widest at about two-thirds their length, concavely narrowed on outer
26) Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
margin to form a blunt, rounded apex. Style rather narrow in lateral view,
bent outwardly near apex forming a short tip which is pointed and curved down-
ward at apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati in ventral view, blunt at apex. In
lateral view they appear tapered with long, slender apices. The shaft forming
two terminal apical processes which are separated by a V-shaped notch, the
apical half slender and extending to apex of the aedalati.
Holotype male: Chiapis, Mexico, June, 1938, A. Dampf. Allotype female:
Same as holotype. Paratypes: 1 female, Same as holotype: 1 male, Mexico
City, 11-11-38, A. Dampf; 1 female, Carinan Camp, Mexico, I-27-39, A. Dampf.
Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) quadralaba DeLong
Figs. 75-76)
Ponana quadralaba DeLong, 1942, p. 98.
A small yellowish species with four black spots on anterior portion of
pronotum., Length, 7-8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than one-half as long at middle as basal
width between the eyes.
Color: Yellow; pronotum with four black spots ina circle just back of
margin, Forewings brownish with a few brown blotches on clavus, apex of
clavus, and one on corium.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum concavely rounded from lateral angles
to a slightly produced median third which is broadly shallowly notched at middle
forming a pair of proximal rounded lobes. Male style rather narrow, sides
scarcely sinuate to near apex where it is concavely excavated on inner margin
with apex strongly curved dorsally and produced into a finger-like process,
usually with a slightly enlarged blunt tooth on outer margin of curved portion
at base of the finger-like process. Aedeagus with the aedalati enlarged at middle,
tapered to blunt apices. The shaft long, rather slender, decidedly broadened at
apex, appearing deeply angularly excavated forming two long divergent, slender,
pointed processes between which is a membraneous wall extending to one-fourth
the distance from the pointed apices.
Type: Holotype male from Tennessee in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: In addition to Tennessee, this species is known to occur in
Nebraska, Arizona, Texas, Wisconsin, Ohio, Kentucky, New Jersey, and
Ontario, Canada.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae P|
Ponana (Ponana) notula (Fowler)
(Figs. 77-79)
Gypona notula Fowler, 1903, p. 313.
Closely related to heiroglyphica but smaller. Length, 6 mm.
Color: Brownish; pronotum with four to eight black spots on the anterior
portion. Forewings with irregular brown markings.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum sinuate. Male style curved and nar-
rowed to form a long, pointed apex. Aedeagus with the shaft bearing a pair
of slender apical processes which extend basad and cephalad and which are
sharply pointed. The male character seems to separate this as a distinct
species and nothing which has been examined in the United States agrees with
this Mexican species.
Type: Holotype male from Mexico in the British Museum of Natural
History.
Remarks: It is known to occur only in Mexico.
Ponana (Ponana) proprior (Fowler)
Figs. 80-82)
Gypona proprior Fowler, 1903, p. 311.
Gypona tergata Fowler, 1903, p. 312.
Form and color of vinula but distinguished by the male and female genital
structures. Length, 8-8.5 mm.
Crown produced and rounded, margin of crown thick.
Color: Yellow to green. Pronotum with a row of small black spots just
back of anterior margin. Forewings dull greenish, apices subhyaline. Clavus
reddish with ramose brown pigment marks. A large black spot on disc.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum almost truncate, or slightly produced
at middle. Male plate broadly rounded at apex. Style abruptly bent and nar-
rowed to form a bluntly pointed apex. Aedeagus with shaft widened at apex and
produced in a pair of erect lateral processes which are short and pointed.
Aedalati tapered to slender, finger-like, apical processes which are curved
abruptly anteriorly just before their apices.
Type: Holotype male from Mexico in the British Museum of Natural
History.
Remarks: Known to occur only in Mexico. The type has been examined.
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) pamana, n. sp.
(Figs. 83-87)
Resembling puncticollis in general form and appearance but with different
male genitalia and different color markings. Length of male 7 mm, female
7.7 mm.
Crown broadly rounded anteriorly, about one-third wider between eyes at
base than median length. Ocelli large, pale in color.
Color: Yellowish tinged with orange, brown, and black. Crown with pale
orange coloring. Pronotum yellow with black markings in a circlet just behind
each eye. Scutellum yellow with the apex and basal angles darker. Forewings
yellow, tinted with pale brown and with darker markings on claval area, heaviest
on anterior half. A large dark brown spot on disc either side, apical veins brown
and a diaginal line extending anteriorly from apex of clavus, dark brown.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles produced and rounded,
between which the posterior margin is shallowly concavely excavated either side
of a median, produced lobe which is broadly, shallowly concavely notched at
middle. The lobe is about two-thirds the width of segment and is produced be-
yond the lateral angles. Male plates long, widest at middle, inner margin con-
vexly curving, outer margin sloping to form a blunt, narrowed, rounded apex.
Style in ventral view broadly concavely notched on inner margin. Apical third
narrowed to form a rather short, outwardly curved finger-like apex which is
narrow and rather sharp pointed at tip. The aedeagus with the aedalati broadened
just beyond middle, then rapidly narrowed and tapered to form slender, appressed
apices. The shaft is long and slender, slightly enlarged just before apex with a
short spine-like process on outer margin, each side, at tip.
Holotype male: R. Panama, Patrerillos, 12-12-52, F. S. Blanton collector.
Allotype female: Cocoli, Panama, C. Z. 8-21-1946, N. L. H. Krauss. Para-
types: 2 males, Panama, Palm Beach, nr. San Carlos, 7-X-1952, F. S. Blanton
collector; 1 female, Alhajuelo, C. Z. Pan. March 11, 1912, A. Busck collector;
1 female, Panama, Rio Hato, I-15-52, F. S. Blanton collector. Holotype, allo-
type, and paratypes in U. S. National Museum; paratype in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) xarela, n. sp.
(Figs. 88-92).
Resembling quadralaba in form and general appearance but with different
color markings and different male genital structures. Length of male 9 mm.
Crown produced and rounded, not quite twice as wide between eyes at base
as median length.
Color: Yellow with brown and pink markings. Crown yellow unmarked,
ocelli red. Pronotum yellow with a pair of round black spots along anterior
margin, one behind each ocellus. Scutellum yellowish. Forewings yellow,
appendix and tips smoky; a brown spot on each cross vein between the first
and second sectors. A pinkish stripe along inner clavus, extending from one-
third the length of scutellum almost to tip of clavus.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 29
Genitalia: Male plates rather short and broad, twice as long as broad,
apices broad and truncate. Style in ventral view appearing only slightly exca-
vated on inner margin. Apical fifth bent abruptly outwardly, apical portion
rather slender, tapered to a pointed apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati tapered
from middle to form slender, inwardly curved apical tips. The shaft is long and
slender, a little broadened at apex and bearing two short terminal spine-like
processes, one on each outer margin.
Holotype male: San Cristobal Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, Cerro de
Heitepec 2700 m., VI-14-1926, A. Dampf. Paratypes: 4 males, same as
holotype; 1 male, Mexico City, 7-2-32, A. Dampf; 1 male, Payo Obispo,
Quintana Roo, VII-30-1925. Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong Collection.
Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) guatama, n. sp.
(Figs. 93-97)
Resembling fortina in form and appearance but usually with more brillant
coloration and with different male genitalia. Length of male 6.5 mm, female
7.) pam,
Crown broadly rounded anteriorly, about one and two-thirds as wide be-
tween eyes at base as median length.
Color: Varying in intensity but with the same general color pattern. Crown
dull yellow to bright orange, the central basal portion usually brownish. Pro-.
notum with the four black spots as in related species. A large spot on each side
just behind eye and two smaller spots just behind anterior margin, one behind
each ocellus. A horizontal band across posterior portion and five longitudinal
stripes extending anteriorly from this yellowish to bright orange or pink band.
Scutellum variable in color but usually with apical angle pale. Forewings yellow
to green with a few brown spots on disc and clavus; a pink marginal stripe along
commissure on basal two-thirds of clavus. |
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with broadly rounded lateral angles be-
tween which the posterior margin is broadly shallowly excavated either side of a
median produced lobe, which is broadly shallowly notched at middle about one-
third the width of the segment and produced beyond the lateral angles. Male
plates with the outer margin sloping and the inner margin curving to form a blunt,
narrow pointed apex next to outer margin. Style slender, broadly shallowly ex-
cavated on inner margin at about middle. Apical third narrowed, then curved
outwardly and tapered to pointed apices. Aedeagus with aedalati slender, apices
bluntly pointed. Shaft with a short V-shaped notch at apex forming a pair of
short, stout, divergent spines.
Holotype male: Santa Lucia and Patulul, Guat., 3-9-42, D. M. DeLong
collector. Allotype female: Same as holotype. Paratypes: 2 males, 1 female,
Rio Grande, British Honduras, June, 1932, J. J. White; 3 males, 3 females,
Columbia, British Honduras, April, 1932, J. J. White; 1 male, Rio Temash,
British Honduras, June 1934; 1 female, Alta V. Paz, Guatemala, 1-4, Cacao,
Trece, Aguas, Schwartz, and Barber collectors; 1 male, Panama, Canal Zone,
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
6-25-1952; 1 female, Panama, R. P. Naranjai, X-1-1952; 1 female, (M.F. 1957),
Huixtla, Chiapas, XI-21-1930. Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection. Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum, the Stockholm Museum,
the North Carolina State University Collection, and the California Academy of
Science Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) fortina, n. sp.
(Figs. 98-102)
-Resembling occlusa in general form and appearance but with more coloration
and different male genital structures. Length of male 6.7 mm, female 7 mm.
Crown broadly rounded anteriorly, more than one and one-half times as wide
at base between eyes as median length.
Color: Yellowish green with black and reddish markings. Crown yellowish
green unmarked. Pronotum same as crown with four round black spots. One,
each side, is on the margin just behind the eye. Two near anterior margin are
just behind the ocelli. Scutellum light brown with the apex pale. Forewings
dull green tinged with yellow, a round brown spot on disc. Inner claval margin
with a bright pinkish red margin extending from base of wing along scutellum and
two-thirds the distance to the apex of clavus. A few irregular small brown spots
are within this band of color.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles broadly rounded to
posterior margin which is broadly and very shallowly excavated either side of
a median V-shaped notch with apex rounded, which extends about one-fourth the
distance to base and is about one-fifth the width of segment. Male plates rather
broad, apex sloping caudally to outer margin, bluntly angled on outer margin.
Style in ventral view appearing broad, broadly shallowly excavated on inner
margin beyond middle, apical sixth curved outwardly and abruptly narrowed to
a pointed apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati slender, narrowed, and converging
at apex. Shaft narrowed before apex, then slightly broadened bearing a pair of
lateral spines, beyond which the apex is broadened and concavely notched forming
a pair of terminal diverging teeth. |
Holotype male: Fortin, Veracruz, Mexico, 10-9-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell,
and Plummer. Allotype female: Columbia, British Honduras, April, 1932.
Paratypes: 3 males, 4 females, Rio Remas, Br. Honduras, Sept., 1937, A. J.
White; 3 males, 3 females, Moralas, Guatemala, Oct., 1930, J. J. White; 1 male,
Honduras, 9-27-34; 2 females, Punta Gorda, Br. Honduras, Feb. and May, 1931;
1 female, Alta V. Paz, Guatemala, 25-4, Cacao, Trece, Aguas, Schwartz, and
Barber collectors; 1 male, Punta Gorda, Br. Honduras, 5-19-34, John L. Buys
collector; 2 male, Mexico, El Salto Falls, 26 mi. W. Antiguo Morelos Tamps,
2000 ft., July 11-14, 1963, Duckworth and Davis; 1 female, Frontera, Tobasco,
Mex., June, 1897, Townshend; 1 male (M. F. 2640), Monte Alto, Ver., VII-3-
1932, A. Dampf; 1 male, (M.F. 2389) Chiltepec, Oaxaca, II-3-1932, A. Dampf;
1 female, (M.F. 1635), Los Mochis, Sinaloa, V-16-1930, A. Dampf. Holotype
and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Allotype and paratypes in the California
Academy of Science Collection, Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum, the _
North Carolina State University Collection, and the Stockholm Museum.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 31
Ponana (Ponana) vulana, n. Sp.
(Figs. 103-107)
Resembling yena in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, not quite twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Crown pale brown with a small faint brown spot on base, one behind
each ocellus. Pronotum pale brown with many minute, brown, punctate spots on
disc and posterior half. A row of six round spots across anterior portion; two
are behind each eye, one next lateral margin and a proximal spot; two are near
anterior margin, one behind each ocellus. Scutellum dull yellow with brown
spots in basal angles. Forewings subhyaline with rows of punctate spots along
margins or parallel to veins. Small brown spots are on disc, clavus, anteapical
and apical cells. The apical veins and crossveins, margined with brown.
Genitalia: Male plates more than twice as long as broad. Outer margin
convexly bulged at middle, apex bluntly angled at outer margin. Style narrowed
at about three-fourths its length, curved outwardly; apical fourth narrow almost
parallel margined to near blunt apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati broadened at
middle and tapered to each end. Apex narrow, pointed, shaft with two prominent
pointed, separated apical processes. Pygofer with narrow blunt apex.
Holotype male: Yepacapa, Guatemala, August, 1948, H. T. Dalmat collector.
Paratypes: 2 males, Same as holotype; 1 male, Pueblo, Mex., 10 miles E., XII-
30-1940, G. E. Bohart collector; 1 male, San Bernadino Rio Mayo, Mex., VI-26-
35, L. G. Gentner collector. Holotype and paratype in the U. S. National Museum.
Paratypes in the California Academy of Science Collection and in the DeLong
Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) pana, n. sp.
(Figs. 108-112)
Resembling fortina in form and general appearance but without the reddish
coloration and with different male sonia structures. Length of male 6.3 mm,
female 7.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded in front, almost twice as wide between eyes at base
as median length.
Color: Greenish yellow, crown unmarked, pronotum with a series of four
black spots; a larger one on each lateral margin just behind each eye and two
smaller spots close anterior margin, one behind each ocellus. Scutellum
yellowish, the basal angles darker, the apical angle paler. Forewings yellowish,
appearing pale brownish when abdomen is beneath, with two rows of minute spots
across folded wings, one row just back of scutellum and another row crossing
just beyond middle of clavus.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles broadly rounded to
posterior margin which is almost truncate. There isa slight, broad excavation
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 1, 1967
either side of a median scarcely produced lobe slightly excavated at center,
which is about the same length of the lateral angles. Male plates slightly con-
cave on outer margin just before apex, convexly curved on inner margin to
form a bluntly pointed apex on outer margin. Style in ventral view rather
broad, broadly, shallowly notched on inner margin before middle. Apical fifth
curved outwardly, rather thick and abruptly narrowed to pointed apices. Aedeagus
with the aedalati broadened at middle, then tapered to slender, converging apices.
The shaft gradually broadened to apex where it bears a median terminal process
and two prominent diverging processes which extend diagonally from the middle
of the apex.
Holotype male: Gatun Lake, Panama, XI-1-31, Tres Rios Plantation, T. O.
Zschokke collector, E. P. Van Duzee Collection. Allotype female: Barro Colo,
C.Z. IV, 1940, Jas. Zetek No. 4647. The holotype is in the California Academy
of Science Collection. The allotype appears to be the same species and is in the
U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) xena, n. sp.
(Figs. 113-117)
A small blunt headed species resembling inflata in size and general appear-
ance but with different male genital structures. Length of male 7 mm, female
8 mm. :
Crown short and broad, scarcely angled, about one-third wider between
eyes at base than median length. :
Color: Pale straw color without definite markings.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with broadly rounded lateral angles
between which the posterior margin is broadly shallowly excavated either side
of a broad, slightly produced median lobe which is about half the width of seg-
ment and is slightly broadly notched at apex. The median lobe is a little longer
than the lateral angles. Male plates broadened at middle, convexly rounded on
inner margin and sloping on outer margin to form a blunt apex. Style in ventral
view appearing shallowly notched on inner margin just before middle, apical
fourth curved outwardly, slightly broadened just before apex, then abruptly
narrowed to a pointed apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati broadened at middle then
tapered to slender converging apices which are shorter than the shaft. Shaft
slender, slightly narrowed just before apex which bears two prominent terminal
spine-like processes. These arise on either side of apex, curve laterally and
caudally and taper to sharp-pointed apices. ,
Holotype male: Zincauro, Gro., Mexico, 9-2-30 (M.F. 1789), J. Parra
collector. Allotype female: Acatlan del Rio, Gro., Mexico (Rio Balsas
Valley), VIM-10-1930. Paratypes: 13 males and 9 females, San Geronimo,
Gro., 8-30-1930 (M. F. 1787), J. Parra collector; 3 males, Same as allotype;
4 males, Same as holotype; 1 male (M. F. 1785), Pandancuareo, Gro, Mexico,
VI0i-28-1930, Jose Parra. Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection. Paratypes in the U.S. National Museum, the California Academy
of Science Collection, the Stockholm Museum, and the North Carolina State
University Collection.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 33
Ponana (Ponana) valeda, n. sp.
(Figs. 118-122)
Resembling rubida in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 9.5 mm, female 10 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, more than twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length. :
Color: Crown straw yellow with a small, black spot behind each ocellus
at base. Pronotum straw yellow with minute brown punctate spots uniformly
distributed. Dark brown to black markings on anterior portion; a round black
spot behind outer margin of each eye, and a curved line, enlarged at anterior
end extending from this to spot at base of crown, a few other small irregular
brown markings. Scutellum pale yellow with pale brown spots in basal angles.
Forewings yellowish subhyaline, with rows and groups of small brown spots.
A larger spot on disc and two or three along commissure at apex of scutellum.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with produced, rounded, lateral angles,
between which the posterior margin is broadly excavated either side of a broad,
rounded median lobe which is almost one-half the width of the segment and pro-
duced almost to the length of the lateral angles. Male plates with outer margin
strongly convexly curved from base to apex, about one and one-half times as
long as greatest width at middle. Inner margin almost straight, apex rather
broadly rounded. Style slightly broadened at about three-fourths its length,
then narrowed to form a tapered apical fourth which curves outwardly, caudally,
and has a blunt narrow apex. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened at middle, ta-
pered at each end, apex pointed. Shaft with a pair of stout, divergent, apical
processes which are rather short and extend beyond apices of aedalati.
Holotype male: Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico, [X-6-39, DeLong and Plummer.
Allotype female: Chilpancingo, Gro., Mexico, X-27-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell,
and Plummer. Paratypes: 1 male, Same as allotype; 1 male and 1 female, El
Dorado, Sin., Mexico, 2-27-32, A. Dampf; 3 males, Guadalajara Jal., Mexico,
Km, 2645, X-3-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer; 1 male, Buena
Vista, Gro., Mexico, X-23-41, Km. 340, DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer.
Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratypes in the U. S. National
Museum, and the Stockholm Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) aurata, n. sp.
(Figs. 123-127)
Resembling tama in form but without color markings and with different male
genitalia. Length of male 7mm, female 7.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, twice as wide between eyes at base as median
length.
Color: Yellow to brownish yellow, without definite markings. The inten-
sity of the yellow coloring is quite variable.
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with rounded lateral angles between
which the posterior margin is slightly broadly concavely excavated either side
of a slightly produced, broad, median lobe. Male plate slender, more than
twice as wide as long, distinctly widened at half its length, then concavely nar-
rowed on outer margin to form a rather narrow, blunt apex, longest at tip, on
outer margin. Style strongly bent at about one-third its length and widened on
inner margin at two-thirds its length, beyond which it is narrowed and rather
abruptly bent outwardly and tapered to a narrow apex. Aedeagus with aedalati
_ broadened at about middle. Shaft narrow with a pair of short, divergent, apical
processes which extend just beyond apices of the aedalati.
_ Holotype male: Yepocapa, Guatemala, May, 1950, H. T. Dalmat collector.
Allotype female: Same data except May, 1948. Paratypes are all from Yepocapa,
H. T. Dalmat collector; 2 males and 23 females, same as allotype; 2 females,
Same as holotype; 1 male and 4 females, August, 1949. Holotype, allotype, and
paratypes in the U. S. National Museum. Paratypes in the DeLong Collection,
the Stockholm Museum, and the North Carolina State University Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) tura, n. sp.
(Figs. 128-132)
Resembling distortia in form and appearance but with fewer color markings
and with different male genitalia. Length of male 7 mm, female 8 mm.
Crown broad, slightly produced at middle, almost bluntly angled. Twice as
wide between eyes at base as median length. i
Color: Crown pale dull yellow. Pronotum same shade of yellow with a few
scattered reddish punctate spots on disc. A row of six black spots across an-
terior portion. One is close to the lateral margin on each side and a proximal
spot are both behind the eye; two are close the anterior margin at middle, one
behind each ocellus. Scutellum and forewings pale yellow unmarked.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with broadly rounded lateral angles
between which the posterior margin is broadly, shallowly, concavely excavated
either side of a median lobe which is about one-third the width of segment and
is slightly notched at apex; lobe produced to about the length of the lateral
angles. Male plates convexly rounded on outer margin at middle, more than
twice as long as broad, apex blunt, rounded. Style narrowed at about seven-
eighths its length, apical portion narrow, short, curved outwardly, apex abrupt-
ly sharp-pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati rather narrow, broadened at middle,
with narrow sharp-pointed apices. Shaft with two short, slender, separated
apical processes. Pygofer tapered to a narrow, blunt apex. |
Holotype male: San Bartolo, L. Calif., 5 mi. W., VII-13-38, Michelbacher
and Ross collectors. Allotype female: Triunfo, L. Calif., VII-13-38. Para-
types: 3 males, Same as holotype; 6 males and 1 female, Same as allotype;
4 males, Miraflores, L. Calif., VII-10-38, Michelbacher and Ross; 1 female,
santiago, L. Calif., VII-8-38, Michelbacher and Ross. Holotype, allotype,
and paratypes in the California Academy of Science Collection. Paratypes in
the DeLong Collection and the Stockholm Museum.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 39
-Ponana (Ponana) xila, n. sp.
(Figs. 133-137)
Resembling aurata in form and size but with distinct color markings and
different male genital structures. Length of male 5.7 mm, female 6.7 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, two-thirds as long at middle as basal width be-
tween the eyes.
Color: Crown yellow unmarked. Pronotum dull yellow with four black
spots across anterior portion. A larger angularly shaped spot is near lateral
margin behind each eye and a round spot is back of each ocellus. A very small
spot is proximal to the large spot behind each eye. Scutellum pale, with basal
angles darker. Forewings pale brownish yellow with two transverse rows of
four spots, each extending from disc of wing across clavus; the spots on each
side of commissure on clavus are smaller.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles rounded, between
which the posterior margin is slightly excavated either side of a broad, pro-
duced median lobe, more than half the width of segment and produced well beyond
the length of the lateral angles. Male plates elongate, more than three and one-
half times as long as wide, apex narrow, blunt, rounded. Style narrowed at
about four-fifths its length, the apical fifth curved outwardly, tapered, apex
sharp-pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened at about two-thirds their
length, then rapidly tapered to slender pointed apices. Shaft narrow with a
pair of short, slender, separated apical processes.
Holotype male: Panama, Canal Zone, I-3-19, F. S. Blanton collector.
Allotype female: Panama, Canal Zone, Ft. Gulick, XII-18-56, F. S. Blanton
collector. Paratypes: All from Canal Zone, F. S. Blanton collector; 1 male,
Panama, IV-17-52; 1 male, Panama, Mojinga Swp., I-8-1953; 1 male, Panama,
Mindi Dairy, XII-17-51; 1 female, Madden Dam, IV-28-1952; 1 female, Ft.
Clayton, Jan., 1952. Holotype, allotype, and paratype in the U. S. National
Museum. Paratype in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) distortia, n. sp.
seroon o Cnigs: tee<l aay.
Resembling xila in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 7 mm, female 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, not quite twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Crown dull yellow. Pronotum same tint with the four black spots
on anterior portion; one on lateral margin behind each eye and one near anterior
margin directly back of each ocellus. Scutellum dull yellow. Forewings dull
yellow with two transverse rows of four spots each crossing clavus. The spots
along commissure on clavus smaller and less prominent.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with rounded lateral angles between
which the posterior margin is shallowly concavely excavated either side of a
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
pair of median broadly rounded lobes produced to the length of the lateral angles,
separated by a broad, rather shallow V-shaped notch, the two lobes about two-
thirds the width of the segment. Male plates elongate, almost four times as
long as wide; outer margin convexly curved at middle, apex narrow, bluntly
pointed. Styles narrowed just before short, curved, narrow bluntly tipped apex.
Aedeagus asymmetrical; aedalati broadest at middle apices tapered and pointed.
Shaft with a long basally directed process on one side and a short process cau-
dally directed on the other side, which is narrowed and sharp-pointed at apex.
Pygofer narrow and rounded at apex.
Holotype male: Tamazunchale, S.L.P., Mexico, July 15, 1963, 2 mi. S.,
Duckworth and Davis. Allotype female: Plancha, Piedra, Peteu, Guatemala,
| X-27-25 at light, A Dampf. Holotype in the U. S. National Museum. Allotype
in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) vandera, n. sp.
. (Figs. 143-147)
Closely related to cacozela but with different male genital characters.
Length of male 8 mm, female 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Crown yellow. Pronotum yellow, disc and posterior portion with
many minute dark brown punctate spots. A small round black spot behind each
eye and irregular brown markings on median anterior portion. Scutellum pale
yellow, basal angles pale brown. Forewings pale brownish yellow, with brown
spots on inner clavus and on disc and area posterior to disc. Some markings
are short and linear or vermiculate.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin rather well pro-
duced and broadly convexly rounded between the lateral angles with a slight
V-shaped notch at apex. Male plates about two and one-half times as long as
wide. Widest at about middle, apex narrowed and truncate. Style broadest at
about three-fourths its length, then rapidly narrowed to form a slender apical
fifth which is curved outwardly, then basally with a tapered, pointed apex.
Aedeagus with narrow aedalati, a little wider at about middle. Shaft slender
with a pair of short, divergent, apical processes which extend just beyond tips
of aedalati. |
Holotype male: Orizaba, Veracruz, X-8-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and
Plummer. Allotype female: Same data as holotype. Paratypes: 1 male, Same
as holotype; 1 male and 3 females, Fortin, Ver., X-9-41, DeLong, Good,
Caldwell, and Plummer. Holotype, allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection. Paratype in the U. S. National Museum, and the Stockholm Museum.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 37
Ponana (Ponana) vedala, n. sp.
(Figs. 148-152)
Resembling valeda in form and appearance but paler in color and with dif-
ferent male genitalia. Length of male 9.5 mm. |
Crown broadly rounded, two and one-half times as wide between eyes at
base as median length.
Color: Crown pale yellow, unmarked. Pronotum pale yellow, disc and
posterior half uniformly marked with minute brown punctate spots. Four small
round brown spots across anterior portion, one behind each eye and one behind
each ocellus. Scutellum pale yellow, basal angles brown. Forewings pale
brown, subhyaline, with minute brown punctate spots margining veins on basal
half. A few irregular brown markings along commissure and apex of clavus.
Genitalia: Male plate almost ovate, two and one-half times as long as
broad, apex broad, almost truncate. Style slightly broadened at two-thirds
its length, then gradually narrowed, curved outwardly on apical fourth and
with a pointed tip. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened at middle, apices tapered,
sharp-pointed. Shaft split at apex forming a pair of long, divergent, sharp-
pointed apical processes. Pygofer with narrow blunt apex.
Holotype male: Chilpancingo, Gro., Mex., X-25-41, DeLong, Good,
Caldwell, and Plummer. Paratypes: 32 males, Same as holotype. Holotype
and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratypes in the U. S. National
Museum, the California Academy of Science Collection, the North Carolina
State University Collection, and the Stockholm Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) yena, n. sp. ~
(Figs. 153-157)
In general appearance resembling tena but with fewer color markings and
with different male genital structures. Length of male 8 mm, female 9 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, about twice as wide between eyes at base as median
length.
Color: Crown yellow. Pronotum yellow, disc and posterior half marked
with many prominent small dark brown punctate spots. The four usual spots
across anterior portion are present but paler in color. Scutellum yellow,
basal angles with small brown spots. Forewings with rows of minute brown
punctate spots, parallel with or as margins to the veins, apical veins margined
with brown. Usually two brown spots are on disc and two on clavus along com-
missure.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin almost truncate,
sloping slightly basally from each lateral angle to middle. Male plates three
times as long as broad, widest at about middle then gradually narrowed, with
outer margin sloping to form a bluntly angled apex on the outer margin. Style
slightly S-curved on apical half, the apical fifth tapered, curved outwardly and
extending caudally with a sharp-pointed apex. Aedeagus with aedalati broadened
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
at middle and tapered at each end, apices slender, pointed. Shaft narrow,
bifid at apex, forming a pair of rather short, slender, divergent processes.
Pygofer with a narrowed, rounded apex.
Holotype male: Tamazunchale, S.L.P., Mexico, 9-20-45, DeLong, Hersh-
berger, Elliott. Allotype female: Same as holotype except 11-2-45. Paratypes:
2 females, Same as holotype; 1 male and 4 females, Orizaba, Ver., X-8-41,
DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer; 3 females, Fortin, Ver., X-9-41,
DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer; 1 male, Valles, S.L.P., [X-25-41,
DeLong, Good, and Caldwell; 1 male and 1 female, Necaxa, Pue, 10-26-45,
Stone, DeLong, Hershberger, and Elliott; 1 male, Ixmiguilpan Hgo., Mexico,
IX-27-41, DeLong, Good, and Caldwell; 1 male, Buena Vista, Gro., Mexico,
X-23-41 (K-340), DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and Plummer. Holotype, allotype,
and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratypes in the U. S. National Museum,
the Stockholm Museum, the North Carolina State University Collection, and the
California Academy of Science Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) tama, n. sp.
(Figs. 158-162)
Resembling valeda in form and appearance but smaller and with different
male genital structures. Length of male 7.5 mm.
Crown rounded, not quite twice as wide between eyes at base as median
length.
Color: Crown dull yellow without definite markings. Pronotum dull yellow,
many darker punctate spots on disc and posterior portion, Four distinct black
spots across anterior portion, one behind each eye and one back of each ocellus.
A few other irregular dark spots on anterior portion. Scutellum pale yellow
with brown spots in the basal angles. Forewings yellow with rows of minute
brown punctate spots margining the veins, brown spots abundant between veins
and with darker spots along commissure, along margin next to scutellum and
along costal margin.
| Genitalia: Male plate elongate, broadest at two-thirds its length then
rapidly narrowed on outer margin to form a narrow blunt apex. Style broad,
rather long, apical fifth narrow, bent outwardly, apex blunt. Aedeagus in ven-
tral view with aedalati appearing broadest at middle, then tapering to each end.
The shaft is slender and bears a pair of short apical processes which curve out-
wardly, then apically and exceed the aedalati in length.
Holotype male: Iguala, Gro., X-25-41, DeLong, Good, Caldwell, and
Plummer, in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) yera, n. sp.
(Figs. 163-167)
Resembling xila in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 7 mm.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 39
Crown broadly rounded, two-thirds as long at middle as basal width between
the eyes.
Color: Crown pale, brownish yellow. Pronotum same shade of yellow with
a series of six black spots across anterior portion; a faint spot next lateral
margin and a larger round spot close to it behind each eye; a darker round spot
near anterior margin behind each ocellus. Scutellum dull, pale brownish yellow.
Forewings same color with a few faint brown spots.
Genitalia: Male plates more than twice as long as wide with a convexly
rounded bulge on the middle of outer margin, apices bluntly pointed. Style
narrowed at four-fifths its length, forming a narrow apical fifth which is curved
outwardly and is broadened just before pointed apex. Aedeagus with aedalati
broadened at middle, apical two-fifths slender, narrow and blunt at apex. Shaft
broadened near apex and bearing a pair of slender terminal processes which are
widely separated by a U-shaped depression. Pygofer with a narrow, blunt apex.
Holotype male: Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico, XII-17-1929, at light along
sea coast, A. Dampf, in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Ponana) mexella, n. sp.
(Figs. 168-172)
Resembling citrina in form and appearance but with a shorter head and
with different genitalia. Length of male 8 mm, female 9.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded anteriorly, more than one-third wider between
eyes at base than median length.
Color: Yellowish green often tinged with pale brown, without definite
markings.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles rounded, between
which the posterior margin is shallowly concavely excavated either side of a
median produced lobe which is broadly angularly notched at middle causing it
to appear almost as two lobes. The lobe is half as wide as the segment and
is produced beyond the lateral angles. Male plates convexly curved on outer
margin near base. Inner margin convexly rounded at apex to form rounded apex
of plate at outer margin. Style in ventral view widened on inner margin, then
convexly rounded at middle to form outwardly bent, tapered, pointed apices.
Aedeagus with the aedalati tapered from near middle to form slender contiguous
apices. The shaft is long and slender, broadened at two-third its length and
terminating in a pair of short, spine-like processes, one on each outer margin
at apex.
Holotype male: Saltillo Coahuila, Mexico, VI-10-1931 (swept from onion
blossoms), A. Dampf. Allotype female: Same as holotype. Paratypes: 3
males, same as holotype; 2 males, Neuvo Leon (desert region), VI-5-1931,
A. Dampf; 1 male, Starr County, Tex., D. J. and J. N. Knull; 1 male,
Hidalgo County, Tex., 3-20-60, D. J. and J. N. Knull. Holotype, allotype,
and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratype in The Ohio State University
40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Collection, the California Academy of Science Collection, the Stockholm Museum,
and the U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) tamala, n. sp.
(Figs. 173-177)
Resembling chiapa in form, appearance, and coloration but with different
male genital structures. Length of male 7 mm, female 7.5 mm.
Crown broadly rounded omnes hag hE almost twice as wide between eyes at
base as median length.
Color: Crown yellow unmarked. Pronotum yellow with a faint brownish
spot at about half the length of pronotum and behind each eye. A pair of round
black spots on anterior portion, one behind each ocellus. Scutellum brown
except paler apical angle. Forewings yellow with a longitudinal brown stripe
extending from scutellum to apical cells. The coloration is darker along
sides of scutellum extending as far as middle of clavus and disc of wing. The
caudal portion of the stripe is paler.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles broadly rounded
to posterior margin which is broadly concavely excavated each side of a median
produced, broad, blunt tooth which is about one-fifth the width of segment and
not produced to the length of the lateral angles. Male plates with broadly
- rounded apices. Styles narrowed at three-fourths their length, then curved
outwardly forming slender bent tips which are sharply angled at apex. Aedeagus
with the aedalati appearing constricted at three-fourths their length, then pro-
duced with apices slender, sharp pointed and may at times be crossed. The
shaft slender, gradually widened at three-fourths its length to apex which bears
a pair of caudally directed spine-like processes, one on each outer margin be-
tween which is the rounded tip.
Holotype male: Sta. Lucia, Patulul, Guatemala, 3-9-1942, D. M. DeLong.
Allotype female: Same data as holotype. Paratypes: 1 male, 1 female, same
as holotype; 1 male and 1 female, Hayon Chiquito, Guatemala, 3-4-1942, DeLong;
1 male, Duentas, Guatemala, 3-10-42, DeLong; i male, Alta V. Paz, Guatemala,
Cacao, Trece, Aguas, Schwartz and Barber collectors; 2 females, Yepocapa,
Guatemala, Dec., 1948, H. T. Dalmat collector; 1 male, Guatemala City, 1932,
C. N. Ainslie collector; 1 female, Tiquisate, 1-26-1955, J. Castro; 31 males
and 34 females, Yepocapa, Guat., 1949; 4 males and 4females, April, 1949;
16 males and 17 females, May, 1948, all collected by H. T. Dalmat. Holotype,
allotype, and paratypes in the DeLong Collection. Paratypes in the U. S.
National Museum, the California Academy of Science Collection, the North
Carolina State University Collection, and the Stockholm Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) tresa, n. sp.
(Figs. 178-182)
Resembling fortina in general form and appearance but with different male
genital structures. Length of male 9 mm.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 41
Crown broadly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal width
between the eyes.
Color: Crown and pronotum bright yellow, unmarked. Scutellum darker
on basal half, apical half yellow. Forewings with a darkened area along sides
of scutellum which extends to apex of clavus and is broadened at middle of
clavus extending to the disc where it terminates in a brown spot. Veins yellow,
apical cross veins brown.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, two and one-half times as long as broad,
apex rather broad, truncate. Style abruptly narrowed at more than four-fifths
its length, bent outwardly and tapered to a narrow sharp-pointed apex. Aedeagus
- with the aedalati broadened at middle and tapered to both ends, apices narrow
sharp-pointed. Shaft with a pair of very short slender separated apical processes.
Pygofer with a sharp-pointed apex.
Holotype male: Omalteme, Guerrero, Mexico, 8000 ft., July, H. H. Smith
collector, inthe U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Ponana) dohrnii (Stal)
Gypona dohrnii Stal, 1864, p. 82.
The narrow head and broad pronotum cause this species to resemble
superficially, Texananus majestus (Osb.). The color is similar to
punctipennis Stal. Length, 8-9 mm.
Crown short, broadly rounded, about twice as wide between eyes at base
as median length. Pronotum strongly, angularly produced on humeral angles,
conspicuously wider than head.
Color: Dull brownish yellow; a black spot behind each eye on base of
crown, one behind each of these on anterior portion of pronotum, and a spot
behind each eye on pronotum; brown. Disc and posterior portion of crown marked
with fine brownish punctures. Forewings pale marked with small brown spots
and a few ramose pigment lines.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin slightly produced
and broadly, convexly rounded at middle.
Type: Holotype female from Mexico in the Stockholm Museum.
Remarks: This species is known from Mexico only. The type has been
examined.
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Ponana) heiroglyphica (Fowler)
Gypona heiroglyphica Fowler, 1903, p. 312.
A light brownish species closely related to puncticollis. Length, 6-7 mm.
Crown broadly, roundedly produced, margin of crown thick.
Color: Light brownish; pronotum with four round black spots in a row just
back of anterior margin. Basal angles of scutellum fuscous.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with lateral angles produced between
which the posterior margin is shallowly, concavely, sinuately excavated. A
broad notch at middle and a slight notch next each lateral angle give the appear-
ance of two broad round lobes. Male unknown.
Type: Holotype female from Mexico in the British Museum of Natural
History.
Remarks: This species is known to occur only in Mexico. The type has
been examined.
Ponana (Ponana) reservanda (Fowler)
Gypona reservanda Fowler, 1903, p. 313.
Closely related to heiroglyphica but with crown more produced and female
segment more deeply excavated. Length, 7 mm.
Crown bluntly produced, apex rounded, margin thick.
Color: Brown; pronotum with four black spots just back of anterior margin.
The central pair are more elongate. Forewings with a large black spot on each
costal margin behind the middle.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum broadly rather deeply excavated between
the lateral angles; posterior margin slightly notched at middle forming two broad,
rounded lobes.
Type: Holotype female from Mexico in the British Museum of Natural
History.
Remarks: Recorded only for Mexico. The type has been examined.
Ponana (Ponana) bisignata (Fowler)
Gypona bisignata Fowler, 1903, p. 313.
Closely related to reservanda but with different markings and female
genitalia. Length, 8-9 mm.
Crown broadly produced, rounded at apex.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae i 43
Color: Light brown; pronotum with four large black spots just back of
anterior margin. Forewings with small scattered black punctures and a large
black spot on the middle of each disc.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum broadly, shallowly notched at middle
and concavely rounded inside each lateral angle, forming two broad median
rounded lobes. Male unknown.
Type: Holotype female from Mexico in the British Museum of Natural
History.
Remarks: Known to occur in Mexico and Guatemala. The type has been
examined.
Ponana, Subgenus Neoponana, new subgenus
Resembling typical ponana species in appearance. Crown broadly rounded,
depressed just above margin and transversely depressed just below margin of
head with a median transverse carina on clypeus between ventral portion of
antennal sockets. Margin with a few coarse, deeply grooved striae, and more
abruptly produced next eyes than in Ponana. Aedeagal shaft usually not cleft
at apex (except in bola), usually with prominent lateral processes arising on
- terminal portion (except bola and dulera. Style sometimes cleft at apex.
Type species: Ponana (Neoponana) demela,n. sp.
| The transverse carina on the clypeus of these leafhoppers appears very
prominent in both sexes and will separate this subgenus from the other two.
Key to Species of Neoponana (Males)
l, Aedeagal shaft with conspicuous lateral char
(Figs. 198, 203) @eeeeoeoeoeeoe#ee3eeeeoeeuxs#ee2#ee? ee @eoaoeoeseeeeoee@eeeeeeoeeeee#ee#dede @ @ @eee
i Aedeagal shaft without lateral processes (Figs. 188, 193) pia Oa whine
2(1') Aedeagal shaft cleft at apex forming two caudally produced
separated apical spines (Fig. 188)......... i Orbs hbase . bola
at _ Aedeagal shaft tapered and bluntly pointed at apex (Fig. 193) ie . dulera
3°(1) Style cleft at apex, forming two apical portions
(Mies, 205: Qt) aio) ek eh as ce a oes Bis Wee wb ni ae wiale's & ees as
3' Style not cleft at apex, usually witha curved or bent
apical portion (Figs. 200, 235, 255)..... ee Oe a es Chis es
4(3) Style with the two terminal pieces appressed, lateral
processes of aedeagal shaft curving ventrally (Fig. 220)......... atea
4a.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Key to Species of Neoponana (Males)
4!
5 (4')
5!
T (3")
a
8 (7)
8'
9 (8')
Q!
10 (9')
10'
11 (7')
11'
12 (11)
Style with the terminal pieces curving or angled away from
each other; aedeagal lateral processes straight extending
laterally and slightly basally (Figs. 203, 205)........eeeeees es eae 5
Style with the longer apical portion curving outwardly
(Figs. 205, 210) @ee8 @ @ ®e@eeeeoeeeeee Gee#eeeee ee @ e@@ee8e @©@eeoeeoee@@e @ ° @eeoeee%ee8 @ 6
Style with the longer apical portion almost t straight |
slightly curving caudally (Fig. 215)... ..cccccccccscccscvccces cerosa
Style enlarged on inner margin just before middle, plates
narrower, pygofer spine slender caopied to pointed apex
(Figs. 205, POG Gk a on Hag bir sein seis. 4s Se en Re oh eer aer cerella
Style almost equal in width, plate more broadened, apical
pygofer spine wider, blunt and rounded at apex
(Pige, 210, Bl) ov pays eV eal wees eck ee buy eae cake ce) MOROGLS
Aedeagal shaft with lateral processes arising apically or
subapically, extending laterally or caudally (Figs. 198,
B43» 248, (25S)o ws whee e > «wee dh Nie Weta week ees bei siti oa wainulonne bum ania 8
Aedeagal shaft with lateral processes arising about one- neixth
the distance from apex, and curved basally and inwardly
(Pigs ):22 30 228; 238, 238) awe as 2 Chlalb, Raed Ge ew ee dee Rew et ik ire ae
Aedeagal shaft enlarged at apex, with short lateral processes
arising on sides of enlarged portion and curved caudally.
Aedalati abruptly narrowed at their apices (Fig. 198) .........-. anepa
Aedeagal shaft with lateral processes longer, arising |
apically. Aedalati gradually tapered to pointed apices
(Figs. 248, 253) @eees @ eeeoeeoee%ee8e e086 @ @ @eoeeeeee ®@ eoeoeeeeoee7eeeee eee e @ e 9
Style with a very short bent portion at apex (Fig. 255)......e.e0. berta
Style with the cree bent wiles long, conspicuous
(Figs. 245, 250). @#e5ou0ueeeeeee lit as wie Mattei Bi alk eucg @®e$0eoe 8 @ 6 @ eee eoeeeee @ @ 10
Aedeagal shaft with lateral processes rather short and
stout, style with apical portion long and slender
(Fig Ss 243.0245)» ce sieie va cha hadeaen Seb ld tae, Atle Rid ails MeO aaah ae GA .. avena
Aedeagal shaft with long very slender lateral processes,
style with apical portion shorter and broader
(Figs. 248, DOO) uss Ger ee Wes @eeeeee @ @ee0ee @e@eeeee 6 @ ©eee0e@6e@ @ @ cleta
Aedeagal shaft with lateral oe bifid
(Figs. 223, 233, 2.38) @eeeeee ee @©eee @ A yea ebari tirana wevien @eee0ee eé 12
Aedeagal shaft with lateral process single '(Fie. CO) is cask cee -e. anela
Aedeagal shaft with lateral processes producing a short
spur at about half its length, style without a heel on
apical foot portion (Figs. 223, 225) ....seseccsccesesccsesacese DETA
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 45
Key to Species of Neoponana (Males)
12' Aedeagal shaft with bifid lateral processes producing
two long slender, curved pieces, style with a heel on
apical foot portion (Figs. 233, 238, 235, 240) .....cscccesccceceee 13
13 (12') Plate elongate, rounded at apex, style with narrow,
rounded heel, toe of foot narrow, sharp pointed
(Figs. 236, 235) . WALA < sR oes (ieee Pie dekWulnclases Gana
io Plate blunt, more pointed, style ‘with heel broader,
more rounded, toe of foot slender but broader
apically (Figs. 2415 240) o.n%.% 2 bar Wh AUS lke CURA Ca ees WeRta
Ponana (Neoponana) bola, n. sp.
(Figs. 186 and 188-192)
Resembling dohrnii in form and general appearance but with different male
genital structures. Length of male 8 mm, female 8.5 mm. ,
Crown broadly convexly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal
width between eyes.
Color: Dull brownish yellow with a pale brownish spot on base behind each
ocellus. Pronotum with spots and vermiculate markings just behind anterior
margin. Forewings with a white spot at middle of clavus on wing margin witha
brown spot on each side. Base of clavus with dark brown spots, a large brown
spot at middle on costal margin and small brownish spots on corium.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with produced rounded lateral angles
between which the posterior margin is broadly shallowly excavated either side
of a broad produced median lobe, which is more than half the width of the seg-
ment, produced to the length of the lateral angles and is broadly, shallowly notched
at apex. Male plates broadened at two-thirds their length, then rapidly tapered
to blunt apices. Styles rather broad, deeply concavely notched at two-thirds
their length, then broadened on inner margins and tapered to a pointed apex.
Aedeagus with aedalati broadest near base, then narrowed and slender to near
apex where they are slightly broadened and blunt at apex; shaft slender and
tapered to a slightly wider apex which is composed of two slightly separated
pieces which converge at tip. Pygofer blunt at apex.
Holotype male: Gatun Lake, Panama, 9-8-1931, Tres Rios Plantation,
T. O. Zschokke collector, E. P. Van Duzee Collection. Allotype female:
Same as holotype. Paratypes: 8 males, same data as holotype except most
dated X-1931; 1 male, Trinidad Rio., Panama, 1-VI-12, A. Busck; 1 male,
Panama, Mojinga Swp., C. Z., 20-XI-1951, F. S. Blankton collector. Holo-
type, allotype, and paratypes in the California Academy of Science Collection.
Male paratypes also in the U. S. National Museum, the DeLong Collection,
and the Stockholm Museum.
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Neoponana) dulera, n. sp.
(Figs. 187 and 193-197)
Resembling dohrnii in form and size but paler in color and with different
male genital structures. Length of male 8 mm, female 9 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, more than half as long at middle as
basal width between the eyes.
Color: Dull dark yellow to pale brown. Crown with a small black spot
at base, back of each ocellus. Pronotum with small black spots and vermicu-
late markings just behind anterior margin. Forewings with reddish veins. A
pale spot near middle of clavus on wing margin. Several spots along costa, a
few on corium and apical cross veins, dark brown.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with prominent lateral angles between
which the posterior margin is deeply excavated either side of a broad rounded
median lobe which is half the width of the segment and is produced to the length
of the lateral angles. Male plates broadest at two-thirds their length, then
rapidly tapered to a blunt, rounded apex. Style rather broad, elongate, deeply
concavely excavated on ventral margin at about two-thirds its length, then
broadened again, bent outwardly and tapered to a blunt apex. Aedeagus with
aedalati rather broad at base, narrowed a little at middle, then broadened again
just before apex and rounded to appressed blunt apices; shaft long, slender, ex-
ceeding the aedalati in length and with a blunt apex. Pygofer with ventral apical
angles bluntly pointed.
Holotype male: Barro Colo. I., C. Z., V-24-40, Jas. Zetek, No. 4656,
in the U. S. National Museum Collection. Allotype female: Barro Colorado,
C. Z., 9-II-36, collected by Gertsch, Lutz, Wood, in the American Museum of
Natural History Collection. Paratypes: 1 male, Gatun Lake, Panama, VIII-
16-1931, Tres Rios Plantation, T. O. Zschokke collector, E. P. Van Duzee
Collection, in the California Academy of Science Collection; 1 male, Barro
Colorado Isl., Panama, IV-28-30-1964, W. D. and S. S. Duckworth, in the
U. S. National Museum Collection; 1 female, Mojinga Swp., C. Z., Panama,
IV-16-1952, in the U. S. National Museum.
Ponana (Neoponana) anepa, n. sp.
ee ey Pees
Resembling bola in form and appearance but darker in color and with dis-
tinct male genital structures. Length of male 9 mm.
Crown broadly, convexly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal
width between eyes.
Color: Pale brown, pronotum with a series of irregular spots along anterior
margin, Scutellum dark anteriorly and pale posteriorly. Forewings brown with
a white spot between two dark brown spots on middle of clavus at margin of wing;
a large black spot on corium and another anterior to it approximately half way
to base of wing.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 47
Genitalia: Male style concavely narrowed on outer margin at about two-
thirds its length and producing a laterally extending apical fourth which is
slender and tapers to a pointed apex. Aedeagus with aedalati roundedly
broadened on apical third, blunt at apex; shaft slender, extending to apex of
aedalati with two minute curved apical spines. Pygofer with ventral portion
of apex blunt, rounded, and thickened.
Holotype male: Columbia: 24 mi. W. Villovicencia, Meta., 1120 m.,
III-12-55, E. I. Schlinger and E. S. Ross collectors, in the California
Academy of Science Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) cerella, n. sp.
Te ies “sOscI0Ty
Resembling cleta in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal
width between eyes. |
Color: Dull yellow to pale brown with darker spots and pale areas. Crown
yellow with a dark brown area surrounding and between ocelli. Pronotum yellow
with dark brown markings surrounding pale areas, across anterior half. A
semicircular band arises at basal angles of scutellum and curves across the
median posterior half. Scutellum yellow with dark spots in basal angles. Fore-
wings mottled with white and dark brown. Clavus along wing margin marked
with three white and two brown spots, alternating from apex of scutellum to
apex of clavus. Anterior half of the costal area pale. A series of fused brown
spots extends from the middle of costa to the corium. Posterior portion of the
forewing brown or smoky.
Genitalia: Male plates rather long with outer margins broadly convexly
rounded, apices bluntly angled. Style long, rather narrow, broadened at four-
fifths its length and cleft at middle so as to form two curved, sharp pointed,
finger-like projections. The inner one a little broader and the outer one
slightly longer. Aedeagus short, broad at base, aedalati tapered to a narrow
apex. Shaft narrow, as long as aedalati, bearing a pair of slender processes
at apex which are one-third as long as shaft and extend laterally. Pygofer with
a pair of conspicuous finger-like processes at apex, either side, extending
caudally and inwardly.
Holotype male: Sinchono, Peru, J. G. Sanders, without specific data, in
the DeLong Collection. |
Ponana (Neoponana) demela, n. sp.
(Figs. 208-212)
Resembling berta in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly convexly produced, more than half as long at middle as
basal width between the eyes. Pronotum more than twice as long as crown.
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Color: Pale brown to dull yellow, marked with darker spots and paler
areas. Crown, pronotum, and scutellum dull yellow. Disc of pronotum tinted
with brown. A series of darker spots extending across anterior portion and
behind eyes. Scutellum with dark brown basal angles. Forewings pale brown.
A white spot with a proximal brown spot on each side at middle of clavus along
wing margin. Dark brown medial areas extending from costa to corium. Veins
dark brown, costal cells smoky.
Genitalia: Male plates broadly convexly rounded on outer margins, apex
rounded. Style elongate, rather narrow, slightly broadened at three-fourths
its length and bifid, forming a shorter inner 'thumb' and an outer curved
"finger" process which is twice the length of the "thumb." Aedeagus rather
short, broadened at base. Shaft narrow, about as long as aedalati and tapered
to a narrow apex which bears a pair of short narrow processes at tip. The
processes are about one-third the length of shaft. Pygofer with large, con-
spicuous, heavily chitinized, thumb-like processes extending caudally and in-
wardly from apex on each side.
Holotype male: Peru, Monson Valley, Tingo Maria, XTI-11-1954, E. I.
Schlinger and E. S. Ross collectors, in the California Academy of Science
Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) cerosa, n. sp.
(Figs, 213-217)
Resembling atea in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 11 mm.
Crown broadly roundedly produced, more than half as long at middle as
basal width between eyes.
Color: Bright yellow, ocelli reddish, basal angles of scutellum darker.
Dark markings similar to atea. A pair of small circular spots near base of
forewing and proximal to costa. A pair near middle and a pair near apex of
clavus on posterior margin of wing, and a spot on corium, each side. Apical
cells slightly smoky.
Genitalia: Male plates long, rather narrow, blunt at apex. Style rather
broad, elongate, concavely excavated near apex on inner margin to form a
narrow produced, finger-like apex which is about one-ninth the length of style.
Aedeagus with aedalati rather narrow, the apex slightly narrower. Shaft
narrow for about the length of aedalati, with a pair of slender processes aris-
ing at apex which are about one-third the length of shaft and extend laterally.
Pygofer with a broad, conspicuous sharp-pointed tooth on each side of dorsal
margin not far from apex. |
Holotype male: Pillahuata, Paucartambo, Prov. Dept. Cusco, Peru,
Dec. 13, 1952, F. L. Waytkowski, deposited in the North Carolina State
University Collection.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae 49
Ponana (Neoponana) atea, n. sp.
(Figs. 218-222)
Resembling cacozela in general appearance and coloration but more slender,
elongate, with different markings and different male genitalia. Length of male
10 mm. »
Crown broadly convexly rounded, more than half as long at middle as basal
width between the eyes. Ocelli large, separated from each other by twice the
distance that each is distant from proximal eye.
Color: Lemon yellow, basal angles of scutellum slightly darker. Fore-
wings with several small black or circular spots. A small round spot on each
_ side just back of clavus on anterior portion of wing. A pair of spots, usually
circular with pale centers on clavus just beyond apex of scutellum. A similar
spot on corium, each side and a smaller one near apex of clavus bordering
margin of wing. The markings will vary in size and intensity.
Genitalia: Male plates long, narrow, rounded at apex. Style broad on
basal third, then narrowed to near apex where it is slightly broadened and
deeply cleft forming an inner thicker and an outer more slender finger-like
process. The outer processes are a little longer and the two are contiguous.
Aedeagus with the aedalati rather broad, narrowed and sloping to blunt apices.
Shaft rather broad, narrowed near middle and again at apex. In lateral view
appearing notched at middle with a pointed spine on ventral margin and bearing
a pair of long, slender processes at tip on ventral margin about one-half as
long as shaft. Pygofer with a pointed tooth extending from dorsal apical margin
on each side. .
Holotype male: Sinchona, Peru, J. G. Sanders, without specific data.
Paratype males: 2, same data as holotype; 1, Santa Isabel, Cusca, Peru,
Dec. 7, 1951, F. L. Waytkowski. Holotype and paratypes in the DeLong
Collection, paratype in the North Carolina State University Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) bera, n. sp.
(Figs. 223-227)
Resembling anela in form and appearance but with different male genitalia.
Length of male 9 mm.
Crown broadly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length and less than half as long as pronotum.
Color: Pale brown with darker spots and paler areas. Crown rather dark
brown. Pronotum mostly dark brown with paler circular areas just behind eyes,
and pale at base. Scutellum dark brown on basal half, paler on apical portion.
Forewings pale brown with a dark spot proximal to a pale spot at middle of
clavus along wing margin. A series of dark spots along costal margin. Veins
pale, margined with brown; cross veins of apical cells and spots along claval
veins, dark brown.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, rather slender and blunt at apex. Styles
50 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
rather slender, elongate, slightly enlarged near base with apical fifth slender,
bent outwardly and tapered to a sharp-pointed apex. Aedeagus with aedalati
rather broad, narrowed slightly on middle, then broadened to form a pair of
apical pieces which are thickened and taper to slender pointed tips; shaft long,
slender, not reaching to the tip of the aedalati; a pair of lateral curved processes
arise not far from apex which extend outwardly where a branched spur arises be-
fore they curve basally. Pygofer with blunt rounded apices.
Holotype male: Tingo Maria, Huan, Peru, May 21, 1947, Alt. 2200 Ft.,
J. C. Pallister coll., Donor Frank Johnson. Paratype male: Same locality
and data as holotype except collected October 19, 1946. Holotype and para-
type in the American Museum of Natural History Museum.
Ponana (Neoponana) anela, n. sp.
he ee
Resembling dohrnii in general form and appearance but darker in color
and with different male genitalia. Length of male 9 mm.
Crown broadly roundedly produced, not quite twice as wide between eyes
at base as median length and less than half as long as pronotum.
Color: Pale brown with darker brown and paler markings. Crown mostly
dark brown, paler at base. Pronotum pale brown with irregular darker mark-
ings along the anterior margin. Scutellum darker on anterior half with basal
angles and two small spots at base equidistant from basal angles and each
other, pale. Forewings with clavus pale brown marked with dark areas at base
and with a pale spot at middle along suture; costal area dark with a series of
pale spots. Veins pale, margined with brown, cells paler, two dark spots on
corium along claval vein, cross veins before apical cells, dark brown.
Genitalia: Male plates narrow and blunt at apex. Styles rather narrow,
curved slightly outwardly on median half, apical fifth bent outwardly, very
slender, tapered and sharp pointed. Aedeagus with aedalati rather broad,
slightly narrowed at middle, apical portions rather broad with sharp-pointed
apices; shaft rather slender, not as long as aedalati, with a pair of lateral
curved pieces arising just before apex and curving outward, basally, then in
toward shaft. Pygofer with apical ventral tips blunt.
Holotype male: Tingo Maria, Peru, XI-1949, H. A. Allard, inthe U. S.
National Museum. Paratype male: Middle Rio Ucayali, Peru, VII-26, F 6116,
H. Bassler Collection, Acc. 33591, in the American Museum of Natural History
Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) dana, n. sp.
(Figs. 233-237)
Resembling bera in form and appearance but with different male genitalia.
Length of male 9.5 mm.
Crown broadly roundedly produced, almost twice as wide between eyes at
base as median length.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae OL
Color: Pale brown marked with darker and paler spots. Crown rather
dark brown. Pronotum paler brown with darker spots and areas on either
side behind eyes. Scutellum pale brown with basal angles darker. Fore-
wings pale brown, veins brown margined; marked with dark brown spots along
costal margin, on clavus, along margin of wing and two on corium. Apical
cross veins and tips of wings brown.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, rather narrow, blunt at apex. Styles
narrow, a little broader at base, abruptly bent at right angles at four-fifths
its length; the apical portion straight, slender, and tapered to a sharp
pointed apex; in lateral view with a rounding protruding heel at base of bent
portion. Aedeagus with the aedalati broad at base then narrowed at about the
middle and produced, forming a pair of elongate apical structures which are
tapered to sharp pointed apices. Shaft rather slender and not as long as the
aedalati, appearing split at apex, forming proximal paired tips. A pair of
lateral processes arise just before this apical split portion and are bifid at
about half their length, both pieces of each process curving basally and in-
wardly and about the same length. Pygofer with the apices blunt, rounded,
normal in appearance.
Holotype male: Peru, Monson Valley, Tingo Maria, XII-18, 1954, E. I.
Schlinger and E. R. Ross collectors. Paratype male: Same locality and
data. Both in the California Academy of Science Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) cesta, n. sp.
(Figs. 238-242)
Resembling quadralaba in form and appearance but with different male
genitalia. Length of male 10 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, almost twice as wide between eyes at
base as median length.
Color: Pale brown marked with darker brown. Crown brown, unmarked.
Pronotum paler brown with darker spots behind eyes on basal portion. Scutel-
lum brown, apical half paler. Forewings pale brown with darker markings
at base of clavus, a paler spot on clavus at middle along wing margin; a few
dark spots at middle of costa, on corium, and apical cells. Veins pale, dark
margined.
Genitalia: Male plates rather long, slender, apices blunt. Styles slender,
slightly enlarged near base. Median portion broadly curving outwardly, apical
fifth bent outwardly, slender, tapered to a sharp pointed apex. Aedeagus with
aedalati rather broad at base, slightly narrowed on middle and producing a
pair of apical pieces which are thickened, elongate and tapered to a pointed
apex; shaft slender and appearing cleft at apex, a pair of lateral processes
arising just before the cleft portion which curves outwardly, basally and in-
wardly to form tightly curled rings. Pygofer with normal apices.
Holotype male: Sinchono, Peru, without specific data, J. G. Sanders
collector, in the DeLong Collection.
52 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Ponana (Neoponana) avena, n. sp.
(Figs. 243-247)
Resembling bera in form and general appearance but with different male
genital structures. Length of male 9 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, not quite twice as wide between eyes
at base as median length.
Color: Pale brown with dark and pale markings. Crown and pronotum
dark brown, a pale area enclosing a dark spot behind each eye on pronotum.
Scutellum brown with three white spots on each side next to base of wings.
Forewings pale brown, veins margined with dark brown. A white spot be-
tween two proximal dark brown spots at middle of clavus bordering wing mar-
gin. Median costal area with brown spots and three spots on corium. Apical
cells smoky.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, almost parallel margined, apices blunt.
Style curved, elongate, narrow, bent abruptly outwardly at about four-fifths
its length, the apical portion extending outwardly at a right angle, tapered
and sharply pointed, without protruding basal "heel". Aedeagus rather broad,
the apical third of aedalati appearing heavily chitinized and each side tapered
_ toa pointed apex. Shaft long and narrow, slightly shorter than the aedalati
and bearing a pair of short slender processes at the apex which are about one-
fifth the length of shaft and extend outwardly. Pygofer with the apex blunt and
rounded.
Holotype male: Santa Isabel, Dept. Cusco, Peru, November 20, 1951,
Felix L. Waythowski, in the North Carolina State University Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) cleta, n. sp.
(Figs. 248-252)
Resembling berta in form and appearance but with different male genital
structures. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, twice as broad between eyes at base as
median length. Pronotum two and one-half times as long as crown.
Color: Brown, forewings marked with darker and paler spots. Crown
and pronotum darker brown, a few paler areas on anterior and lateral portions.
Scutellum with anterior half dark, brownish, apical half pale. Forewings dull
brownish yellow, veins darker. A paler spot between two dark brown spots on
middle of clavus and bordering wing margin. Dark markings on median costal
margin and a large brown proximal spot on corium. Apical veins and cross
veins dark brown.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, broadened at about middle sloping to
narrow, blunt apices. Style elongate, narrow, bent at four-fifths its length
to form a slightly broader apical portion which extends outwardly and is blunt
at apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati broad and tapered to a narrow pointed
apex. Shaft slender and extends well beyond the aedalati and bears a pair of
long, slender processes at the apex which are about half the length of the
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae D3
shaft and extend laterally. Pygofer with apices blunt and rounded.
Holotype male: Sinchono, Peru, J. G. Sanders, without specific data,
in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana (Neoponana) berta, n. sp.
(Figs. 183-185 and 253-257)
Resembling bera in form and general appearance but more vividly marked
and with different male genitalia. Length of male 8.5 mm.
Crown broadly convexly rounded, twice as wide between eyes at base as
median length.
Color: Mostly pale brown with rather distinct dark and light markings.
Crown dark brown, the basal margin paler. Pronotum with disc and posterior
portion darker, the lateral and anterior margins are dull yellow with darker
spots and blotches. Scutellum brown anteriorly, yellow apically. Forewings
brownish, veins dark brown; a white spot between two dark brown spots at
middle of clavus along wing margin. A series of dark spots, some of which
are merged, at middle of costal margin and two brown spots proximal to
these on the corium.
Genitalia: Male plates elongate, broadened at middle, apices narrowed
and blunt. Style elongate, rather narrow, broadened at base and again at
four-fifths its length where it bends rather abruptly outwardly, is narrowed
and with a blunt apex. Aedeagus with the aedalati broadest at less than half
its length, narrowed and tapered to apex. Shaft longer than aedalati with a
pair of long slender processes which arise at apex and extend laterally.
Pygofer with apices rounded, normal.
Holotype male: Santa Isabel, Dept. Cusco, Peru, Dec. 6, 1951, Felix L.
Waythowski. Paratype males: 5, same as holotype; 1, Chincaniago, Peru,
without specific data; 1, Callangra, Pancartambo Prov., Dept. Cusco, Peru,
Feb. 19, 1952, F. L. Worthowski. Holotype and paratypes in the North
Carolina State University Collection. Paratype in the DeLong Collection.
Ponana, Subgenus Bulbana DeLong
Green, robust species with crown usually bluntly angled, depressed just
above and before prominent median enlarged margin. Clypeus convexly inflated,
tumid, without transverse depression below anterior margin of head.
Type species of subgenus: Bulbana pura DeLong.
o4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Key to Species of Subgenus Bulbana
1 Crown angularly produced, rounded at apex, more than
half as long as basal width. Female segment witha
deep, broad U-shaped notch at middle. (Male unknown)...... extensa
i ges Crown shorter, less angled, less than half as long as
basal width. Female segment roundedly produced at
middle, not notched or emarginate ........ eR ETE be aise ee 2
2. Male aedeagus with a pair of short, proximal, sharp-
pointed apices which are separated by a narrow,
V-shaped notch. Style with apical portion curved
TEAMS GE SOIV . coin dS eee ho sone ewe eres OP ee een re ae ee 3
ye Male aedeagus with a pair of short, proximal, sharp-
pointed apices separated at base by a short, pointed
tooth. Style with apical portion produced obliquely,
straight, and tapered to a sharp-pointed apex ........ Pn inflata
3. Face only weakly inflated or bulbous. Male plate convexly
rounded on outer margin to a narrowed, roundedly pro-
CUCEG ADOR ieyiss areas se Side GH ORE Ra HS ba lice ee W's Chien Ge ae integra
os Face strongly bulbous. Male plate convexly rounded from
inner margin to a broad apex produced to its greatest
length on outer margin. Male style more narrowed
before pointed apex .........0. He WES <welerkha els ed WI cde pura
Ponana (Bulbana) extensa (DeLong)
Bulbana extensa DeLong, 1942, p. 108.
In form and general appearance resembling female of integra but with more
angularly produced crown and distinct female genitalia. Length of female 10 mm.
Head decidedly narrower than pronotum. Crown angularly produced,
rounded at apex, more than half as long as wide. Face convexly roundedly in-
flated. |
Color: Dull greenish; eyes and ocelli red.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin broadly,
roundedly produced either side of a rather shallow, concavely rounded excava-
tion on median fourth. |
Type: Holotype female from California in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: This species is recorded only for California.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae D0
Ponana (Bulbana) inflata (DeLong)
Bulbana inflata DeLong, 1942, p. 108.
Resembling citrina superficially but with more produced crown, dark
green without markings and with distinct male genitalia. Length of male
7mm.
Crown bluntly, angularly produced; apex rounded, almost twice as wide
between eyes at base as median length. Face strongly inflated, bulbous.
Color: Dull green washed with yellow; appendices of forewings smoky
brown.
Genitalia: Male style twice curved with a dorsally curved apex which
is straight on caudal margin and sharp pointed at apex. Aedeagus with
lateral paired processes tapered to long, slender, pointed apices which
are convergent. Shaft decidedly widened near apex, then rapidly narrowed
to form a pair of short, sharply pointed apices separated by a narrow deep
notch. Aedalati tapered and narrow at apex.
Type: Holotype male from Texas in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: It is reported only from Texas.
Ponana (Bulbana) pura (DeLong)
Bulbana pura DeLong, 1942, p. 108.
Resembling inflata in form and appearance but with more rounded crown
and distinct genitalia. Length of male 7.5 mm. |
Crown broadly rounded, twice as wide between eyes as median length, a ©
definite furrow just back of crown margin, face strongly inflated.
Color: Dull green, unmarked.
Genitalia: Male style similar to integra but with apical portion shorter
and more narrowed after curving outwardly. Aedeagus similar to integra.
Plate entirely different, broadened at apex, is sere to greatest length on
outer margin.
Type: Holotype male from Texas in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: Collected to date in Texas alone.
Ponana (Bulbana) integra (DeLong)
Bulbana integra DeLong, 1942, p. 109.
In general appearance resembling inflata but with crown more pointed,
56 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
face less inflated, and without the longitudinal furrow back of crown margin.
Length of male 8 mm, female 9.5 mm.
Crown bluntly angled, more than half as long at middle as median width
between eyes at base. Ocelli in depressions on either side.
Color: Bright to dull green. Forewings usually dull green, appendices
of forewings brown.
Genitalia: Female seventh sternum with posterior margin shallowly
concave either side of lateral angles to a median broad, slightly produced,
convexly rounded lobe which is slightly notched at middle. Male style with
a produced, rounded enlargement on the ventral or inner margin just beyond
middle, apical portion narrowed, curved outwardly, and pointed at apex.
Aedeagus with aedalati tapered and bluntly pointed. Shaft slender, bulbous
at apex with a pair of short terminal spines between which is a sunken
tooth. Plate bluntly rounded at apex, outer margin convexly rounded.
Type: Holotype male from Texas in the DeLong Collection.
Remarks: Known only from Texas.
LITERATURE CITED
Ball, E. D. 1920. A review of the species of the genus Gypona occurring
in North America North of Mexico (Homoptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc.
Amer, 13: 83-100.
Ball, E. D. and J. A. Reeves. 1927. Further studies on the genus Gypona
and its allies (Rhynchota, Homoptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer.
20: 488-502; pls. 25-26.
DeLong, D. M. 1918. Additional records of Tennessee Cicadellidae
(Hemiptera--Homoptera). Ohio Jour. Sci. 18: 227-228; 3 figs.
1942. A monographic study of the North American species
of the subfamily Gyponinae (Homoptera--Cicadellidae) exclusive of
Xerophloea. Ohio State Univ., Graduate School Studies, Contrib.
Zool. Entomol. No. 5. Biol. Series 1942: xiv+187, 35 pls.
Fitch, A. 1851. Catalogue with references and descriptions of the insects
collected and arranged for the State Cabinet of Natural History. Ann.
Report New York State Cabinet Nat. Hist. 4: 43-69.
Fowler, W. W. 1903. Order Rhynchota. Suborder Hemiptera-Homoptera
(Continued). Biologia Centrali-Americana 2: 293-316; pls. 20-21.
Gibson, E. H. 1919. A review of the leafhoppers of the genus Gypona
north of Mexico. Proc. U. S. National Museum 56: 87-100.
DeLong and Freytag: Studies of the World Gyponinae Oo”
Metcalf, Z. P. 1962. General Catalogue of the Homoptera. Fasc. VI.
Cicadelloidea. Part 3. Gyponidae. Agr. Res. Ser. U. S. Dept.
Agr. 1962: 1-229.
Oman, P. W. 1949. The Nearctic leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae).
A generic classification and checklist. Memoirs Entomol. Soc.
Washington 3: 1-253; 44 pls.
Spangberg, J. 1878. Species Gyponae, generis Homopterorum, Bihang
Kongl. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl. 5 (3): 5-76.
Stal, C. 1854. Nya Hemiptera. Ofv. Svenska Vet. Akad. Forh, 11: 231-255.
Van Duzee, E. P. 1914. Nomenclatural and critical notes on Hemiptera.
Canadian Ent. 46: 377-389.
. 1923. Expedition of the California Academy of Science to the
Gulf of California in 1921. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4) 12: 123-200.
Woodworth, C. W. 1890. Jassidae of Illinois. Bull. Illinois State Lab.
Nat. Hist. 3: 9-33; 3 pls.
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE I
Figure 1-2 Ponana (P.) aenea
Figure 1. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 2. Lateral view of style
Figure 3-4 Ponana (P.) rubida
Figure 3. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 4. Lateral view of style
Figure 5-6 Ponana (P.) limbatipennis |
Figure 5. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 6. Lateral view of style
Figure 7-8 Ponana (P.) pectoralis
Figure 7. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 8. Lateral view of style
Figure 9-10 Ponana (P.) sparsa
Figure 9. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 10. Lateral view of style
Figure 11-13 Ponana (P.) limonea
Figure 11. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 12. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 13. Lateral view of style
Figure 14-15 Ponana (P.) citrina
Figure 14. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 15. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 16-18 Ponana (P.) scarlatina
Figure 16. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 17. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 18. Lateral view of style
Figure 19-21 Ponana (P.) puncticollis
Figure 19. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 20. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 21, Lateral view of style
Not drawn to the same scale
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE II
Figure 22-24 Ponana (P.) tena
Figure 22. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 23. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 24. Lateral view of style
Figure 25-27 Ponana (P.) aquila
Figure 25. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 26. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 27. Lateral view of style
Figure 28-30 Ponana (P.) candida
Figure 28. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 29. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 30. Lateral view of style
Figure 31-32 Ponana (P.) cacozela
Figure 31. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 32. Lateral view of style
Figure 33-35 Ponana (P.) punctipennis
: Figure 33. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 34, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 35. Lateral view of style
Figure 36-38 Ponana (P.) velora
Figure 36. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 37. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 38. Lateral view of style
Figure 39-40 Ponana (P.) sonora
Figure 39. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 40. Lateral view of style
Figure 41-43 Ponana (P.) vinula
Figure 41. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 42. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 43. Lateral view of style
Not drawn to the same scale.
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE Ii
Figure 44-46 Ponana (P.) volara
Figure 44. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 45, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 46. Lateral view of style
Figure 47-49 Ponana (P.) vebera
Figure 47. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 48. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 49. Lateral view of style
Figure 50-52 Ponana (P.) xella
Figure 50. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 51. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 52. Lateral view of style
Figure 53-55 Ponana (P.) rubrapuncta
Figure 53. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 54. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 55. Lateral view of style
Figure 56-58 Ponana (P.) cincta
Figure 56. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 57. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 58. Lateral view of style
Figure 59-61 Ponana (P.) occlusa
Figure 59. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 60. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 61. Lateral view of style
Not drawn to same scale.
64 _ Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE IV
Figure 62-64 Ponana (P.) yura
Figure 62. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 63. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 64. Lateral view of style
Figure 65 Ponana (P.) floridana
Figure 65. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 66-68 Ponana (P.) divergens
Figure 66. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 67. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 68, Lateral view of style
Figure 69-71 Ponana (P.) chiapa
Figure 69. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 70. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 71. Lateral view of style
Figure 72-74 Ponana (P.) xola
Figure 72. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 73. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 74. Lateral view of style
Figure 75-76 Ponana (P.) quadralaba
Figure 75. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 76. Lateral view of style
Figure 77-79 Ponana (P.) notula
Figure 77. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 78. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 79. Lateral view of style
Figure 80-82 Ponana (P.) proprior
Figure 80. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 81. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 82. Lateral view of style
Not drawn to the same scale.
66 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE V
Figure 83-87 Ponana (P.) pamana
Figure 83. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 84. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 85. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 86. Ventral view of plate
Figure 87. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 88-92 Ponana (P.) xarela
Figure 88. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 89. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 90. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 91. Ventral view of plate
Figure 92. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 93-97 Ponana (P.) guatama
Figure 93. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 94, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 95. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 96. Ventral view of plate
Figure 97. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 98-102 Ponana (P.) fortina
Figure 98. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 99, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 100. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 101. Ventral view of plate
Figure 102. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
68 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI
Figure 103-107 Ponana (P.) vulana
Figure 103.
Figure 104.
Figure 105.
Figure 106.
Figure 107.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer |
Figure 108-112 Ponana (P.) pana
Figure 108.
Figure 109.
Figure 110.
Figure 111.
Figure 112.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 113-117 Ponana (P.) xena
Figure 113.
Figure 114.
Figure 115.
Figure 116.
Figure 117.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate.
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 118-122 Ponana (P.) valeda
Figure 118.
Figure 119.
Figure 120.
Figure 121.
Figure 122.
“Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
70 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE VII
Figure 123-127 Ponana (P.) aurata
Figure 123. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 124. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 125. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 126. Ventral view of plate
Figure 127. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 128-132 Ponana (P.) tura
Figure 128. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 129. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 130. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 131. Ventral view of plate
Figure 132. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 133-137 Ponana (P.) xila
Figure 133. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 134. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 135, Lateroventral view of style
Figure 136. Ventral view of plate
Figure 137. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 138-142 Ponana (P.) distortia
Figure 138. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 139. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 140. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 141. Ventral view of plate
Figure 142. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
72 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII
Figure 143-147 Ponana (P.) vandera
Figure 143.
Figure 144,
Figure 145.
Figure 146.
Figure 147.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 148-152 Ponana (P.) vedala
Figure 148.
Figure 149,
Figure 150.
Figure 151.
Figure 152.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 153-157 Ponana (P.) yena
Figure 153.
Figure 154.
Figure 155,
Figure 156.
Figure 157.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 158-162 Ponana (P.) tama
Figure 158.
Figure 159.
Figure 160.
Figure 161.
Figure 162.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
74 - Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE IX
Figure 163-167 Ponana (P.) yera
Figure 163.
Figure 164,
Figure 165.
Figure 166,
Figure 167.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 168-172 Ponana (P.) mexella
Figure 168.
Figure 169.
Figure 170.
Figure 171.
Figure 172.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style’
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 173-177 Ponana (P.) tamala
Figure 173.
Figure 174,
Figure 175.
Figure 176.
Figure 177.
Ventral view of aedeagus
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 178-182 Ponana (P.) tresa
Figure 178. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 179.
Figure 180.
Figure 181.
Figure 182.
Lateral view of aedeagus
Lateroventral view of style
Ventral view of plate
Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
76 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE X
Figure 183 Ponana (N.) berta
Figure 183. Dorsal view
Figure 184 Ponana (N.) berta
Figure 184. Face
Figure 185 Ponana (N.) berta
Figure 185. Lateral view of head and pronotum
Figure 186 Ponana (N.) bola
Figure 186. Female seventh sternum
Figure 187 Ponana (N.) dulera
Figure 187. Female seventh sternum
Figure 188-192 Ponana (N.) bola
Figure 188. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 189. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 190. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 191. Ventral view of plate
Figure 192. Lateral view of pygofer
Figures 186-192 drawn to the same scale.
78 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI
Figure 193-197 Ponana (N.) dulera
Figure 193. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 194, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 195. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 196. Ventral view of plate
Figure 197. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 198-202 Ponana (N.) anepa
Figure 198. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 199, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 200. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 201. Ventral view of plates
Figure 202, Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 203-207 Ponana (N.) cerella
Figure 203. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 204. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 205. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 206. Ventral view of plate
Figure 207. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 208-212 Ponana (N.) demela
Figure 208. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 209. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 210. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 211. Ventral view of plate
Figure 212. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
208 209 210 ell 2l2
80 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI
Figure 213-217 Ponana (N.) cerosa
| Figure 213. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 214, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 215. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 216. Ventral view of plate
Figure 217. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 218-222 Ponana (N.) atea
Figure 218. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 219. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 220. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 221. Ventral view of plate
Figure 222. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 223-227 Ponana (N.) bera
Figure 223. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 224. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 225. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 226. Ventral view of plate
Figure 227. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
82 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XUl
Figure 228-232 Ponana (N.) anela
Figure 228. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 229. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 230. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 231. Ventral view of plate
Figure 232. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 233-237 Ponana (N.) dana
Figure 233. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 234. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 235. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 236. Ventral view of plate
Figure 237. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 238-242 Ponana (N.) cesta
Figure 238. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 239. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 240. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 241. Ventral view of plate —
Figure 242. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
ONG
Wh
ey
238 239 242
84 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIV
Figure 243-247 Ponana (N.) avena
Figure 243. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 244, Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 245. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 246. Ventral view of plate
Figure 247. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 248-252 Ponana (N.) cleta
Figure 248. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 249. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 250. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 251. Ventral view of plate
Figure 252. Lateral view of pygofer
Figure 253-257 Ponana (N.) berta
Figure 253. Ventral view of aedeagus
Figure 254. Lateral view of aedeagus
Figure 255. Lateroventral view of style
Figure 256. Ventral view of plate
Figure 257. Lateral view of pygofer
All drawn to the same scale.
86 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 7, 1967
Index to Subgenera and Species
aenea 6, 9, 58 notula 4, 27, 64
tia eee 2 82 occlusa 8, 22, 30, 62
anepa 44, 46, 78 : pamana 4, 28, 66
aquila 8, 15, 60 pana 9, 31, “68
atea 43, 48, 49, 80 pectoralis o 7, 11, 24, 58
aurata 7, 33, “35, 70 Ponana 1, 3
avena 44, 52, 84 proprior 5 27, 4
proscripta 14
puncticollis 6, 14, 28, 42, 58
punctipennis 8, 17, 41, 60
pura 53, 54, 55
bera 44, 49, 50, 52, 53, 80
berta 44, 47, 52, 53, 76, 84
bimaculata 11
bisignata 42
bola 43, 45, 46, 76 _ quadralaba 6, 21, 26, 28, 51, 64
Bulbana 13, 53
reservanda 42
cacozela 5, 16, 36, 49, 60 rodora 13
candida 17, 16, 60 rubida 8, 10, 33, 58
cerella 44, 41, 78 rubrapuncta 8, 21, 62
cerosa 44, 48, 80
cesta 45, 31, 82
chiapa 8, 24, 40, 64
cincta 4, 21. 62
citrina 6, 12, 21, 23, 39, 55, 58 spadix 13
cleta 44, 47, 52, 84 Sparsa 5, 11, 58
curiata 17 tama 6, 17, 23, 38, 72
dana 45, 50, 82 | tamala 9, 40, 7
4:
demela 43, 44, 47, 78 tena 8, 14, 37, 60
tergata a7
distortia 3, 34, 38, 70
tresa 4, 40, 74
divergens rhs 24, “64 tura 5, 34, 70
dohrnii 41, 45, 46, 50
dulera 3, 43, 46, 76, 18 valeda 6, 8, 33, 37, 38, 68
vandera 7, 25, 36, 72
Sanguinolenta 14
scarlatina, 3, 6, 9, 10, 13, 58
sonora 6, 18, 60
eenee Ge vebera 5, "20, 62
floridana 4, 23; 64 vedala 14, 37, 72
fortina 5, 23, ; 29, 30, 31, 40, 66 velora 5, 17, 60.
vinula 4, 18, 27, 60
grisea 14
volara 5, 19, 20, 62
... vulana 7, 31, 68
woodworthi 11
xarela 4, 28, 66
xella 7, 20, 62
xena 6, 8, 32, 68
limbatipennis 5, 10, 58 xila 7, 20, 35, 38, 70
limonea 8, 12, 58 xola 4, 25, 64
yena 1, 19, 31, 31, 12
mexella 9, 39, 74 yera 9, 38, 74
Neoponana 1, 3, 43 yura 1, 23, 64
guatama 6, 29, 66
heiroglyphica 27, 42
inflata 54, 55
integra 54, ‘55
irrorella 13
Contributions |
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 8, 1967
ARSON ea
eet
poe a ¢ i, >
go % 3 Lt we f ‘ A an,
£408 ¢47/4.7 705 Ff «™
22 ® ae | i” a it
te O Pee. £5 %,
d i
ye
ae {
- 7
a” yy 4
7
%,
,
Fit al ) 400")
JUN 1 3 196;
~~ e
ii ee
Aramis
-CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MOSQUITO FAUNA OF
SOUTHEAST ASIA. - I
The Genus Aedes, Subgenus Neomacleaya Theobald in Thailand.
By
Mercedes D. Delfinado
CONTRIBUTIONS
of the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
The Contributions are for larger papers on insects. Each paper is a separate number, with
separate pagination and index. Separate numbers aggregating about 500 pages constitute a volume.
Issues appear irregularly, as suitable manuscripts are available.
Copies are sold separately or in subscriptions to complete volumes. Complete volumes are
$12.00. The price of separate numbers varies. Subscribers are billed for each volume with its
beginning number, and receive the parts as issued. Orders for separate numbers that total less
than $8.00 must be accompanied by payment. Address orders for correspondence to the American
Entomological Institute, 5950 Warren Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, U.S.A.
Parts of Volume 1, with prices
No. 1. Dasch, Clement E., 1964. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).
75 pages, 69 figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
“No. 2. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
: I. Belkin, John N., etal. A project for a systematic study of the mosquitoes of
Middle America.
II. Belkin, John N., etal. Methods for the collection, rearing and preservation of
mosquitoes.
78 pages, 4figures. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 2a. Same as no. 2, but in Spanish. Price: $2.25, postpaid
No. 3. Matthews, Robert W., 1965. The biology of Heriades carinata Cresson. (Hymenoptera,
Megachilidae). 33 pages, 23 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
No. 4. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
Il. Ramalingam, Shivaji, and John N. Belkin. Two new Aedes from Tonga and Samoa.
IV. Belkin, John N. The mosquitoes of the Robinson-Peabody Museum of Salem
expedition to the southwest Pacific, 1956.
34 pages, 3 figures. Price: $1.00, postpaid
No. 5. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1965.
V. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America.
95 pages. Price: $2.75, postpaid
No. 6. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae), 1966. :
VI. Belkin, John N., Robert X. Schick, and Sandra J. Heinemann.
Mosquitoes originally described from North America.
39 pages. Price $1.00, postpaid
No. 7. DeLong, Dwight M. and Paul H. Freytag, 1967. Studies of the world Gyponinae
(Homopotera, Cicadellidae). A synopsis of the genus Ponana.
86 pages, 257 figures. Price: $2.50, postpaid
No. 8. Contributions to the mosquito fauna of southeast Asia.
I. Delfinado, Mercedes D. The genus Aedes, subgenus Neomacleaya Theobald in
Thailand.
55 pages, 20 figures. Price: $1.75, postpaid
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 1, Number 8, 1967
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MOSQUITO FAUNA OF
SOUTHEAST ASIA. - I
The Genus Aedes, Subgenus Neomacleaya Theobald in Thailand.
By
Mercedes D. Delfinado
CONTENTS
THEVPOUUCIION 6 ie as ee 1
Br ee TERIA Pee Vee a ee ae eo eae a 2
OE SG 8 ic ets oe mia cet ee ore ae keg! hae eo ae oe 3
Keys to the species in Thailand
PO GeleS fae iol ee es ke eae ee nk ke ea we a
TO in ay ae ite e.e Oe ey aR Rh ei Ato c anki nk 5
et ee ree ue sig eye re EC ea 8) eo 7
Ee i ee Se eo Sag Grete
Descriptions of the species
Py es et ye re oa iy ee acs ww a a habla 9
Beto eae aie eee ce gear Taino en Sy aan a E 11
ei Att er ye Be ee eR Mla hte ge a lls 12
gy ed bee eg 13
Oe a GA eae alg ie a ceil ew Bic ta 14
hy Mp Si gaia hg go gigs 16
et er eis a ak aN ce we we eae a ee aus 17
CUO SES AISISECBGHEG RRCTUE RSE Bir a eng «an Ge (THA aa age Se acoso 18
Os BO ee ee ee i ea ky gah, 20
ee Be a aca eee a ee a ee ee es tle 21
ee ar i i eh peng seh ge gag mg eg age 22
Prey ete, Wai 0 Cy et ge lee 24
I Ce i ee ee ee kg ely 25
Pp te es a i ee eee we eGR) ae ee oe ca 26
INO A el et ee eee kl ye te eer oe se Ri 28
PHO PUPBICANG | Perso ec ate et ee ace ee eae aye er 29
PC a ee sci a al Rl Nete Sage ae al al 29
ak Bi ee ee ie Oates gillian Wiehe ty 30
eh ane a ete ence gy Lg Wage tga g Ve va take 30
OD eas te gee o. wroee Ge an chance oe ala 32
Acknowledeeniente. 6.050 hain aie ee as Ga Se oe We Ale Maa 33
I VG OU 2 a au a SR PTR la) rt ocean Ceh EUR RTR RAN a ae ag ENN UPN Eg ca ea ne 33
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MOSQUITO FAUNA OF
SOUTHEAST ASIA. - I
THE GENUS AEDES, SUBGENUS NEOMACLEAYA THEOBALD
IN THAILAND !
By
Mercedes D. Delfinade-
INTRODUCTION
This is the first of two papers which will deal with a revision of the
Aedes, subgenus Neomacleaya of South East Asia. The subgenus Neoma-
cleaya was originally described (Theobald 1907: 238) as a distinct genus based
on a Single species. It has been synonymized (Edwards 1932: 174; Stone,
Knight and Starcke 1959: 204) with subgenus Aedes s. sty., and later Belkin
(1962: 412) synonymized it with Verrallina. The name Neomacleaya is here
resurrected for a subgenus of primarily Oriental mosquitoes previously
placed in the subgenera Aedes or Verrallina.
This present paper deals with 20 species from Thailand, of which 7 are
described as new, and 9 are reported as new records; Aedes adustus Laffoon
is treated here as a synonym of A. andamanensis Edwards.
The terminology of the female terminalia used here is that employed by
Laffoon (1946). The term postatrial plate is applied to those structures form-
ing the posterior wall of the atrium, and the term preatrial plate for those
forming the anterior wall. The preatrial plates and preatrial sclerite are
normally folded over the postatrial plates (figure 3). In the figures the pre-
atrial sclerite and plates are extended anteriorly to obtain a good view of the
structures. The larval and pupal chaetotaxy and terminology used is that of
Belkin (1962).
The specimens used in this study were largely collected by the SEATO
Laboratory personnel in Bangkok, Thailand. The holotypes of the new species
will be deposited in the U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C. The
paratypes whenever available will be distributed among the British Museum
(Natural History), London, and the B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii.
An asterisk following the abbreviations used (?-for female, “-for male,
1
This work was supported by Research Contract No. DA-49-193-MD-2672
from the U. S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Office of
the Surgeon General.
2South East Asia Mosquito Project, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
L-for larva, P-for pupa) indicates that at least some portion of that sex or
stage is figured. Two asterisks after a locality or species indicate a new
record.
Thai locality names are taken from the Official Standard Names Gazet-
teer No. 97 of the United States Board of Geographic Names, Washington 1966.
First-order Administrative Units or Changwats, as they are called in Thai-
land, are italicized and precede place names.
Genus AEDES Meigen
Subgenus NEOMACLEAYA Theobald
Neomacleaya Theobald 1907, Mon. Cul. 4: 238. Type species: Neomacleaya
indica Theobald. Monobasic.
Aioretomyia Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3:185. Type species:
Aioretomyia varietas Leicester (Brunetti 1914: 55).
Closely related to the two subgenera Vervallina Theobald and Aedés
s, sty. from which Neomacleaya can be distinguished by the remarkably
developed and complex female and male terminalia, the relatively short
proboscis and certain characters of the larva and pupa. The female termi-
nalia of Vervallina approach most closely those of Aedes s. stv. in being uni-
form and simple in structure and offer no assistance in the identification of
the species. The mesepimeral hairs which are present behind the scale
patch extend to the lower portion of the sclerite in a few species of Neoma-
cleaya while the anterior portion of the sternopleuron is normally bare.
These hairs are always present in Verrallina and absent in Aedes s. str. The
larvae have 8-12 (rarely 14) comb scales arranged in a single row (except in
A. campylostylus which has comb scales arranged in an irregular row).
Each scale is pointed and with a fine, lateral fringe. They are likely to be
confused with those of Aedes s. str., in which the comb scales are strongly
pointed and with a short, fine lateral fringe. Species of Verrallina have more
than 14 comb scales, each scale rounded and fringed apically. The pupae can
be separated from those of most other subgenera by abdominal hair 9- VIII,
which has 1-3 branches (except in A. cyrtolabis, in which it has 10 branches).
The subgenus possesses the following characters: FEMALE. Brown or
blackish brown species. Head. Eyes contiguous; torus with fine hairs or
small broad scales; proboscis slender, equal in length or slightly longer than
fore femur by at most the length of the labella; scales on vertex flat, broad,
with a few upright forked scales confined to the occiput; palpus short, from
1/10 - 1/6 the length of the proboscis. Thorax. All scales on scutum and
scutellum narrow; dorsocentral and acrostichal bristles well developed;
anterior pronotal lobe and posterior pronotum with bristles, a few scales
present in some species and in A. yusafi the anterior pronotal lobe covered
with broad, flat white scales; pleuron with patches of broad scales on upper
mesepimeron and upper and lower sternopleuron; mesepimeral hairs behind
the scale patch sometimes extending downwards to the middle of the sclerite;
lower mesepimeron bare or with hairs; sternopleural hairs on anterior por-
tion few in number or absent. Legs. Scales dark, with femora pale ventral-
ly; hind claws simple or toothed; fore and mid claws equal or unequal, with
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 3
both claws toothed. Wings. Dark scaled; alula fringed with narrow or broad
scales; squama fringed with long, fine hairs; cell Rg longer than its stem;
halter with pale stem and dark knob. Abdomen. Terga completely dark or
with pale basal lateral markings or complete pale bands; sternal markings
variable in most species: Terminalia. Cercus conical; postgenital plate with
a median emargination; postatrial plate well sclerotized and variously devel-
oped, usually with long, thick hairs along the posterior margin of the opening;
preatrial plate well developed, varied in size and shape; three spermathecae
usually of different sizes: large, medium and small, each with a slender or
swollen neck; sternum VII with a median emargination, each side bearing a
eroup of strong bristles.
MALE. Similar to female in general habitus. Head. Antenna plumose
with about 10 to over 20 hairs in each whorl. Legs. Hind claws simple or
toothed; fore and mid claws unequal with the larger claw toothed. Terminalia.
Complex and variously developed; basimere strongly produced apically, with
Subapical projections and strong spines or processes on the inner mesal mar-
gin and base; aedeagus simple, with a large basal plate; paraproct (extension
of sternum X) markedly developed in most species and varied in shape.
LARVA. Head. Wider than long, integument smooth or granulose; hair
1-C long and simple; 3-C fairly well developed; 4-C a small, short branched
tuft and difficult to find; 5,6-C with 3-6 branches; 7-C with at most 18 branches;
4,7-C usually anterior to 5,6-C; antenna short, spinose; hair 1-A branched.
Thorax and Abdomen. Thoracic and abdominal setae simple, integument
smooth; comb scales arranged in a single row (except in A. campylostylus),
each scale pointed and with a lateral fringe; siphon usually 2 1/2 times as long
as broad at base; pecten teeth well developed, the distal teeth widely spaced;
saddle incomplete, spiculate or smooth distally; hair 1-X single, rarely dou-
ble; ventral brush with at most 8 setae; precratal tufts present.
PUPA. Cephalothorax. Hair 11-C always single, strong and very close
to 10-C. Abdomen. Most abdominal setae single or double; hair 1-I well de-
veloped, dendritic, with an expanded base, varied on other segments; 2-I-VII
Single, spine-like in some species; 3-I branched and farther away from 2-I in
most species; 5-II- VII usually posterior to 4-II-VU; 9-VIII poorly developed,
usually single except in cyrtolabis. Paddles. Outer margin finely serrated;
one paddle hair (1-P) about 1/3 the length of the saddle.
DISTRIBUTION. The subgenus Neomacleaya is restricted to the Oriental
region except for A.neomacrodixoa King and Hoogstraal and A. panayensis
Ludlow, which also occur in the Australasian region (New Guinea, Schouten
Islands, Morotai and Moluccas).
BIOLOGY. The adults have been collected biting man in mangrove
swamps during the daytime, in dense jungle, and at light traps. The im-
matures have been found in various types of temporary ground pools such as:
residual pools, flood pools in dry stream beds, foot prints in ricefields,
muddy pools and road ruts, shaded grassy ground pools and leaf filled pools;
also in crab holes along coastal areas; in brackish puddles in nipa palm
Swamps at the extreme upper limit of the tidal zone; and in tree holes.
The following species are recognized in Thailand:
1. Aedes (Neomacleaya) andamanensis Edwards
3(2).
4(3).
5(2).
6(5).
7(6).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
Aedes (Neomacleaya) atrius Barraud **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) cautus Barraud **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) clavatus Barraud **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) cretatus, n. sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) cyrtolabis Edwards **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) dermajoensis Brug **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) dux Dyar and Shannon
Aedes (Neomacleaya) gibbosus, n. Sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) hispidus, n. sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) incertus Edwards **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) indecorabilis (Leicester) **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) indicus (Theobald) **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) latipennis, n. Sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) notabilis, n. sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) protuberans, n. sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) pseudodiurnus (Theobald) **
Aedes (Neomacleaya) torosus, Nn. Sp.
Aedes (Neomacleaya) uncus (Theobald)
Aedes (Neomacleaya) vallistris Barraud
KEYS TO THE SPECIES IN THAILAND
FEMALES
Abdominal terga with pale markings..........
Abdominal terga dark, without lateral pale patches or pale bands. .. .14
Terga II-VI with pale basal or subbasal bands....
O35 18 6 OO KO? (Olen Os OO TO (OS. '@
Terga II-VI with pale lateral patches only, sometimes produced onto
as Sve 31 11g pla tee i RN ee a ead ce ei page eaten ha
CO PURO OO Orie ten! 8: (Oe) 6 ve
Terminalia as in figure 18, the larger spermatheca with a bent swollen
VeOn he a ea ee cree oy a ghia ate glee
indicus (Theobald)
Terminalia not as above, spermathecae each with a short neck......
Terminalia as in figure 5, the postatrial plate with characteristic
WINS STIR@’SUUCIOUPeS 0 ic ss ek ences, + os
- .cretatus, Nn. Sp.
Terminalia as in figure 18, the postatrial plate not as above........
hispidus, n. sp.
Hind tarsal claws toothed; terminalia as in figure 18, the postatrial
plate with 2 hairy lobed structures........
FING Wat Sal Craw SAI le S.C, eee a eee cee ea a ae
Meron of hind coxa with fine hairs...... fae ty
Nieror or Hind COma bare er ee ee ee
..-notabilis, n. Sp.
Lower mesSepimeron with numerous fine hairs; terminalia as in figure
** Indicates a new record
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 5
20, the postatrial plate scalloped along the anterior margin of the
OPORINE i 6S EO QI, LR eee ree .gibbosus, nN. Sp.
Lower mesSepimeron bare; terminalia as in figure 1, the postatrial
plate with bluntly pointed apical arms... .andamanensis Edwards
8(7). Lower mesepimeron with numerous fine hairs; terminalia as in
figure 16, the postatrial plate with a characteristically large,
cordatewpening ... joicd Lajos eee .uncus (Theobald)
Lower meseépimier on bares: (. 3°0 FAoG, A heh es hey ke oe 9
9(8). Terminalia as in figure 12, with simple, pocket-shaped postatrial
Te SPY egy 2/5 aS a ede ee ees ele .incertus Edwards
Terminalia with well developed postatrial plates.............. 10
10(9). Terminalia as in figure 18, the postatrial sclerite with lobed lateral
COPRCrS. i. FAAS oi dis Hin eins Oi we Heres .cautus Barraud
Terminalia with rounded postatrial sclerite................. 11
11(10). Terminalia as in figure 17, the preatrial plate with a pair of strong
transverse ridges, not hairy............. .clavatus Barraud
Terminalia’ not @S°apove . 6) fiche Whi a ER VY AS PS TACOS ode 12
12(11). Terminalia as in figure 17, with 2 smaller preatrial plates........
vallistris Barraud
Terminalia with markedly large preatrial plates .............. 13
13(12). Terminalia as in figure 3, the postatrial plate with a pair of
sclerotized pointed processes on each side of the opening......
| atrius Barraud
Terminalia as in figure 14, the postatrial plate lightly sclerotized,
mostly covered with short hairs.......... -latipennis, N. Sp.
14(1). Hind tarsal claws toothed; terminalia as in figure 20, with a simple,
bulbous postatrial plate............. indecorabilis (Leicester)
Hind tarsal claws simple; terminalia as in figure 9, with a pair of
hairy finger-like processes on postatrial plate..............
dux Dyar and Shannon
(Females of the following species unknown: cyvtolabis , dermajoensis ,
pseudodiurnus and torosus)
MALES
Ly, Abdominal terga With ale markings eS Se eae wb ele es 2
Abdominal terga dark without lateral pale patches or pale bands... . 16
2(1). Terga Ti-V i wim pate basa) bands. 5c ieie ie a eee ek ee ee 3
Terga II-VI with pale lateral patches only, sometimes produced on to
COV Gee ee ial gO sk oa) ob bos, a ROE Reg ate ae aL el a dae 4
4(2).
5(4).
6(4).
7(6).
8(7).
9(8).
10(6).
11(10).
12(10).
13(12).
14(12).
15(14).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
Terminalia as in figure 6, the basimere with a large, bent peg-like
process and 2 large spines near the base..... .cretatus, n. Sp.
Terminalia as in figure 8, the basimere with 2 subapical spines and
2 large subbasal Spines............... .dermajoensis Brug
Meron ob hind coxa with fine hairs Ariss sorbed cee teed «6. 5)
Meron ot hing coxa, bare saci ee race tld a BT eral). be ea 6
Lower mesepimeron with numerous fine hairs; terminalia as in figure
Pe ee ee ee ee se Moe gay .gibbosus, n. sp.
Lower mesepimeron bare; terminalia as in figure 2.............
andamanensis Edwar ds
Lower meSepimeron with numerous fine hairs................ 7
Liower, mesepimeron bare Wi seghs oe le err eh wy ell acdacea hh +f 10
Terminalia as in figure 7, the paraproct much enlarged, long and
GD: ie aE INOS agers ad Rid sired oO boleh Ud yaa ne Pr me eee cyrtolabis Edwards
Terminalia as in figure 19, the distimere crooked and with a small
process at tie middie. 9 res ey eS Pe es torosus; Ni. Sp.
Terminalia not as above, with Simple distimere............... 9
Terminalia as in figure 19; sternum IX with 3 or 4 median spines.....
UnCUS (Theobald)
Terminalia as in figure 19; sternum IX simple. . . .pvotuberans, 0. Sp.
Patavrect divided or forked...) 6 9 el ha ek be des 11
PAreproct NOU aS ADOVE’ > iia e Yet. oe tie ale a ce a tba be cee 12
Terminalia as in figure 17, the basimere broadly produced distally
and with a small knob-like process......... . Clavatus Barraud
Terminalia as in figure 20, the basimere strongly produced distally
and with 4-5 strong tooth-like processes........ cautus Barraud
Pareproct: broadly flattened. se Pe ee SEE Oe oe eo ae ene 13
Paraproct slender, tapered distally; . -. 2: bees 6 eV eS 14
Terminalia as in figure 15, the distimere with a crescentic process at
PG SE ee yk oe a Se ara elie baa latipennis, Nn. Sp.
Terminalia as in figure 19, the distimere very short, swollen distal-
ly with 4 or 5 projections............. pseudodiurnus Barraud
Terminalia as in figure 4, the basimere with 4-5 very strong internal
CUP Y COS DINOS Ase, ei Fuge Mind han) UEA Sie. al te Dato teand ans be atrius Barraud
IVE fe cROVE re Ce We a a ee ok A Bok ey hg 15
Terminalia as in figure 17, the basimere projected apically into a
slender pointed process, with 2 subapical projections and a group
of strong spines on inner mesal margin..... . vallistris Barraud
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand
Terminalia as in figure 20, the basimere projected
apically into a
broad blunt projection, with a long slender elbowed process
BPISIWIERAL TNE DASE... a le Be ee
. indicus (Theobald)
16(1). Hind tarsal claws’toothed; terminalia as in figure 13, the basimeres
joined together subapically......... .indecorabilis (Leicester)
Hind tarsal claws simple; terminalia as in figure 10, the basimeres
very Short and not joined together........ dux Dyar and Shannon
(Males of hispidus and notabilis unknown; incertus and indicus uncertain)
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
3(3);
6(4).
7(2).
8(7).
PUPAE
Abdominal hair 9-VII-VIUI with many branches; cephalothoracic hair
3-C extremely long, single (figure 7)......
.cyrtolabis Edwards
Abdominal hair 9-VII always single; single or double (rarely 3-
branched) on VIII; cephalothoracic hair 3-C much shorter, may
DE Dranched tP ets oF Paar ee ae ee rar ne ee,
Abdominal hair 2-I-VII normally developed......
Abdominal hair 2-I-VII large and spine-like.....
Abdominal hair 9-VII always single or split at tip.
Os) We Oe JO Oi IOS SB, BOs 5D Oi) Os i 1G aa
Oo) By Oe, Oo.) Oe ea On Oi es Or ae
Abdominal hair 9-VIII normally double, or 3-branched in some
SPCC els lero he Serer er mee ere nee
ON, OF) ON 0) 6) O°.) O55, (6 One 0-158. Le
Abdominal hair 6-VII with 4-5 short, weak branches; 9-VII rather
short; cephalothoracic 3-C double (figure 11). .
. .gibbosus, n. Sp.
Abdominal hair 6-VII single; 9-VII conspicuously long; cephalo-
CHOPaCIC TAN Oe SEC IO ee ee ee ee ee ee ee oat et
Abdominal hair 7-III-V branched, single on VI-VII;
hair 10-C with 4 or more branches (figure 4). .
Abdominal hair 7-III-VII single (except on V where
cephalothoracic
.. .atrius Barraud
it is double);
cephalothoracic hair 10-C with 6 or more branches (figure 2). ...
andamanensis Edwards
Abdominal hair 7-I double; 4-VII-VII double (figure 6)...........
Abdominal hair 7-I single; 4-VII-VII single (figure
cretatus , n. Sp.
Raia gerne eat
dux Dyar and Shannon
Abdominal hair 5-IV-VI very long, reaching the distal margins of the
following segments; cephalothoracic hair 3-C with 4 branches...
Abdominal hair 5-IV-VI shorter, not reaching the distal margins of
the following segments; cephalothoracic hair 3-
6 1666. cb am lr jae EE get rl a A RI A A anc
C single or
Abdominal hair 6-VII single; 7-III-IV branched, single on V; cephalo-
thoracic hair 10-C with 5-6 branches (figure 8)
07) 56, 110) 0 ie) Za! 2es! fe” ie sor > ‘en ene
dermajoensis Brug
8
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
Abdominal hair 6-VII with 3-4 branches; 7-II[-V short, branched;
cephalothoracic hair 10-C with 3-4 branches (figure 13)........
incertus Edwards
9(7). Abdominal hair 3-I close to 2-I; 7-VI-VII single, fairly weak; 9-VII
conspicuously long (figure 15)............ .latipennis, n. sp.
Abdominal hair 3-I farther away from 2-I; 7-VI-VII double, very long;
9-VII very short and poorly developed (figure 16)............
uncus (Theobald)
(Pupae of the following species unknown: cautus , clavatus , hispidus ,
indecorabilis, indicus, notabilis, protuberans, pseudodiurnus, torosus and
vallistris)
FOURTH STAGE LARVAE
1. Anal gills short, as long as saddle (figure 9). . ..dux Dyar and Shannon
Anal gills lonsers ham Baden ua Sn ee we Rew 2
2(1). Abdominal:hair 6-Iisingle . oxi. hike a .cyrtolabis Edwards
Apdominatenaiy Grd OURS a eo ee ee LOOPY Ale FE 3
3(2). Prothoracic hair 1-P double; hair 1,3,5-VIII with stout branches
Ceaiee BO) 0k PN Bea OG .latipennis, n. sp.
Prothoracic hair 1-P always single; hair 1,3,5-VIII with normal,
Senet Or ncires er a a Pe oe a ere ore. aS 4,
4(3). Abdominal hair 4-VIII single; antennal hair 1-A with only 3 branches
which are stout (fioure 20)... 2. wees Wee acters indicus Theobald
Abdominal hair 4-VIII double; antennal hair 1-A with 3 or more
BiORUer tr Ane 8 th OSE ee AP ae Yor: 5)
5(4). Prothoracic hair 9-P with 3 branches (figure 12). . . imcertus Edwards
PROMOrZC ait Oa Binge re ee ise. ce aawaiaumnver edt PEC Se es ae 6
6(5). Head hair 5-C with 6-8 branches, 6-C with 4-5 branches; hair 12-P
OUIIION TIES 220s OU ae i a ieee tke sat denied .atrius Barraud
Head hair 5-C with at most 5 branches, 6-C with 2-4 branches; hair
Ree SPO ae 6 el ees wh, eC ee, ee 7
7(6). Anal gills about 4 times the length of the saddle; antennal hair 3-A
PREG CES OOO i ae lees vende CMA cretatus, Nn. sp.
Anal gills about 2 1/2 times the length of the saddle; antennal hair
3-A as long as 6-A (figure 1).......... andamanensis Edwards
(Larvae of the following species unknown: clavatus, dermajoensis, gibbosus,
hispidus, indecorabilis, notabilis, protuberans, pseudodiurnus, torosus,
vallistris, uncus and uncertain in indicus)
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 9
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) ANDAMANENSIS Edwards
(Figures 1, 2) }
Aedes (Neomacleaya) andamanensis Edwards 1922a, Indian J. med. Res. 10:
272-(o%),
Neomacleaya indica var. simplex Theobald 1908 @on Theobald 1903), Rec.
Indian Mus. 2: 291.
Aedes (Aedes) adustus Laffoon 1946, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36: 236 (o*9);
Knight and Hull 1953, Pacif. Sci. 7: 473 (taxonomy). NEW SYNONYMY
A species having fine hairs on the metameron, forked apical projections
of the male basimere and a large sclerotized postatrial plate in the female
terminalia. The larva is recognized by the stout siphon with 12-14 pecten
teeth, the last 3 or 4 distal teeth long and simple. The pupa has a long but
fairly weak abdominal hair 2. Other differentiating characters are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex with pale narrow curved scales on the mid
portion along the eye margin and occiput, patches of broad pale scales on both
sides, and upright narrow scales confined to occiput; torus with small broad
dark scales on inner side; palpus short, about 1/8 the length of the proboscis,
blackish brown; proboscis longer than fore femur by the length of the labella,
blackish brown. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales mostly golden mixed
with dark to reddish brown scales; anterior pronotal lobe and posterior pro-
notum with narrow curved golden scales and bristles; postspiracular area with
pale broad scales and 4-5 bristles; large patches of pale scales on upper
mesepimeron and sternopleuron, a smaller patch on lower sternopleuron, the
anterior portion bare or with up to 5 fine hairs; mesepimeral hairs behind
scale patch extending slightly downwards; lower meSepimeron bare; meta-
meron with fine hairs; propleuron with pale scales below and a row of bristles
above. Wing. Alula fringed with broad dark brown scales. Legs. Dark
brown, with the femora extensively pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch main-
ly brown, with a small pale spot above; mid and hind coxae each with a small
patch of pale scales; hind claws equal, simple; fore and mid claws toothed and
equal. Abdomen. Terga dark, with pale lateral patches slightly produced on
to dorsum; sterna largely pale scaled, narrowly dark at apices. Terminalia.
As in figure 1. Three unequal spermathecae, each with a short, narrow neck;
cercus short; postgenital plate broad, with a wide deep emargination; post-
atrial sclerite rounded, wide laterally; postatrial plate broadly sclerotized,
with characteristic distal arms, and numerous short fine hairs; preatrial
plate represented by two small lateral platelets and a larger median hairy
piece.
MALE. General habitus as in the female. Legs. Hind claws equal,
simple; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia.
As in figure 2. Basimere produced into a large broad process with a deep
concave depression at the apex, a slender forked prolongation with 2-4 |
prongs, another slender process divided at tip and a smaller projection near
base of the distimere which may sometimes be absent; distimere long and
slender, tapered distally; aedeagus simple, rather short; paraproct very long,
swollen at base, tapering towards tip.
* oes an abbreviation indicates that at least some part of that stage is
illustrated.
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
LARVA. As in figure 1. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Head. Hair 1-C rather stout; 3-C fairly long; 4-C inconspicuous, with many
branches; 5-C with 5 rarely 6 barbed branches; 6-C with 4 rarely 6 barbed
branches (8 branches in 1 specimen); 7-C well developed, with 10-12 branches
on an expanded base; mental plate with 34-39 lateral teeth; antenna spinose;
hair 1-A inserted before the middle, with 4-5 branches; 2-A long and stout;
4-A slender, half as long as 2-A; 3-A slender, as long as 6-A. Thorax. Hair
1-P single; 2-P double; 3-P with 3-4 shorter branches; 9,10,12-P single.
Abdomen. Hair 6-I,II double (3-branched in some specimens), single on the
following segments; 7-I single, with 3-5 short branches on other segments;
segment VHI with 10-11 comb scales, each scale pointed and with a lateral
fringe; hair 1-VIII with 4-5 barbed branches; 2-VII double, simple; 3, 5-VIII
each with 6-8 barbed branches; 4-VIII double, simple; siphon fairly stout, with
12-14 pecten teeth, each tooth with a strong lateral denticle except for the 3 or
4 distal teeth which are simple and longer, the last teoth inserted just over 1/2
to apical 1/3 of the siphon; siphonal tuft with 3 weak branches; saddle incom-
plete, smooth; hair 1-X single or double; 2-X with 6-8 branches; 3-X single;
anal gills about 2 1/2 times as long as saddle: 2 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 2. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C with 2-3 short branches; 10-C with 6-9 branches;
11-C single; 12-C with 2-3 branches. Abdomen. Hair 2-I-VII weak, not mod-
ified; 3-I with 2-3 branches, near 2-I; 5-IV-V double, single on VI-VU; 7-III-
Vil single except V where it is double: 9-VII fairly long, single; 9-VII normal-
ly double, poorly developed on other segments; 4-VIII single or double.
Paddles. Outer edge finely serrated; hair 1-P simple.
BAY Par An tay dndianidivaints Edwards, type male, terminalia in cell-
uloid mount on pin in the British Museum; type locality: ANDAMAN ISLANDS.
Aedes (Aedes) adustus Laffoon, holotype male, terminalia on slide in the U. S.
National Museum; type locality: Cape Melville, Balabac Island, PHILIPPINES.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 2 males, 8 females, 3 larval and 10
pupal skins, Songkhla, Haad Yai; 3 males, 6 females, Khon Kaen, Tham Pho
Ti Yan; 1 male with pupal skin, Rat Buri, Ban Salok; 2 females, Nakhon Si
Thammarat : 2 females, Chiang Mai; 1 female, Narathiwat Waeng. Other
distribution. I have also seen specimens from ANDAMAN IS., INDIA, _
MALAYA, SINGAPORE, SUMATRA, INDOCHINA, JAVA **, NORTH BORNEO **,
and the PHILIPPINES (as adustus).
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The external characters and the female and
male terminalia appear to be indistinguishable from A. johnsoni Laffoon and
A. margarsen Dyar and Shannon, both from the Philippines. A. andamanen-
sis, however, can be distinguished by the poorly developed projection at the
base of the distimere which is difficult to find, or absent in some specimens,
while it is well developed in margarsen and johnsoni. The number of prongs
of the forked projection of the male terminalia is very variable. Also, the
larva Shows considerable variation in the development and number of branches
on head hair 5, 6-C and so does cephalothoracic hair 10-C in the pupa. Con-
cerning the synonymy of addustus with andamanensis, I have examined the
type specimens and the two species agree very closely. I have no doubt that
they are conspecific.
** indicates a new record.
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 11
BIOLOGY. The larvae have been collected in pools in dry stream beds
and shaded road ruts (as @dustus), and in puddles (Laffoon 1946).
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) ATRIUS Barraud
(Figures 3, 4)
Aedes (Neomacleaya) atrius Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 16: 371 (9*);
Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 293 (¢*).
A markedly distinct species on the basis of the female and male termi-
nalia and on the characters of the larva and pupa. The male basimere bears
4-6 large curved spines, and the female postatrial plate has a pair of scler-
otized pointed processes on each side of the opening. The larva is distin-
suished by the many branches of head hair 5, 6-C and by the numerous teeth
(40-44) on the mental plate. The pupa can be recognized by cephalothoracic
hair 10-C having 4 or more branches and by the position of abdominal hair 3-I
which is close to 2-I. Other distinguishing features of the species are as fol-
lows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex blackish brown with pale narrow scales from
the middle to occiput and with pale narrow and broad scales around the eye
margins, the upright scales dark, and with large patches of pale scales lateral-
ly; torus with small, dark flat scales on inner side; palpus dark brown, about
1/8 the length of the proboscis; proboscis slender, blackish brown, about as
long as fore femur. Thorax. Scutal scales dark brown, golden along anterior
margin and on the scutellum; pleuron with patches of loosely arranged white
scales on the sternopleuron and upper mesSepimeron; anterior pronotal lobe
with a row of 10-12 bristles, without scales; posterior pronotum with a few
scattered lanceolate brown scales and a row of 6 bristles posteriorly. Post-
Sspiracular area with 4-5 bristles and no scales; sternopleuron with a row of
10-12 bristles and a few hairs behind the upper scale patch, without hairs on
the anterior portion; lower mesepimeron bare, a few hairs present behind the
upper white scale patch; metameron bare; propleuron with more bristles than
scales. Wing. Alula fringed with broad dark brown scales. Legs. Blackish
brown, the femora extensively pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch brown at
the middle, pale above and below; mid coxa with a small white scale patch, no
scales on the hind coxa; hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal,
each claw toothed. Abdomen. Terga dark, sometimes with lateral pale
patches produced on to dorsum cn terga II-VI but not forming complete bands;
sterna pale scaled on basal 1/2, except sternum VII which is pale apically.
Terminalia. As in figure 3. Three spermathecae, each with a long and nar-
row neck; cercus short, rather broad; postgenital plate broad, with a wide
deep emargination; postatrial sclerite rounded; postatrial plate well scler-
otized, with a pair of lateral pointed processes posteriorly, and many coarse
hairs along the margin of the opening; preatrial plate very large, hairy and
divided to near base.
MALE. Similar to female.in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws simple,
equal; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As
in figure 4. Basimere with 2 lobe-like projections at the apex, with one lobe
bearing a group of strong bristles while the other lobe is divided and bears 2
short spines at the tip, also with a row of 4-6 long strong curved spines on
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
inner mesal margin; distimere curved at the middle, narrowed apically and
with scattered long setae; aedeagus simple, well sclerotized; paraproct
tapered to a pointed tip.
LARVA. As in figure 3. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Head. Hair 1-C comparatively slender; 4-C very small and with 6-8 short
branches; 5-C with 6-8 long, barbed branches; 6-C with 4-5 barbed branches;
7-C with 15-18 branches; 8-C single or double, simple; mental plate with 40-
44 lateral teeth; antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted just before the middle of
the shaft, with 4-5 barbed branches; 2-A long, stout; 4-A slender, shorter
than 2-A; 3-A slender, as long as 6-A. Thorax. Hair 1-P single; 2-P double,
sometimes single; 3-P with 3 or 4 branches; 9,10-P single; 12-P double.
Abdomen. Hair 6-I-II double, single on the following segments; 7-I single,
with 6 long weak branches on II; segment VII with 12 pointed comb scales,
each scale fringed laterally; 1-VII with 5-6 barbed branches; 2, 4-VIII each
with 2 simple branches; 3,5-VII with 9 and 10-11 barbed branches respective-
ly; siphon slightly swollen at the middle, with 12-14 pecten teeth, the distal 3
or 4 teeth large, widely spaced and without denticles, the last tooth inserted
at about apical 1/3 of the siphon; siphonal tuft subapical, with 3-4 fairly long
branches; saddle minutely rugose, incomplete; hair 1-X single or double; 2-X
with 8-10 branches; 3-X single; anal gills very long and slender, about 3 1/2
times the length of the saddle; 2 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 4. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C double; 10-C with at most 8 branches; 11-C single;
12-C with 2 or 3 branches. Abdomen. Hair 3-I with 1-3 branches, long and
single on II-III, near 2-1; 2-I-VII normally developed; 5-III-VI double; 7-I0-V
branched; 9-VIOI normally double, 3-branched in some specimens, single and
small on other segments except on VII where it is fairly long; 4-VIII usually
double. Paddles. Outer margin finely serrated; hair 1-P simple.
TYPE DATA. I select here as lectotype a female labeled cotype,
terminalia on a Slide, in the British Museum, with the following data: "#2587
Aedes (Aedes) atrius Barraud/cotype female/Nongpoh, ASSAM".
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 3 males, 7 females, 27 larval and 6
pupal skins, Nakhon Nayok; 2 males, 6 females, 5 larval and 6 pupal skins,
Kanchanaburi, Khao Salak Phra; 1 female, Nakhon Ratchasima, Koraj Dhong
Chad Thing. Other distribution. I have seen specimens from INDIA.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. Several whole larval mounts in the U. S.
National Museum collection from Thailand are referred provisionally to atrius.
They show considerable variation, and it is difficult to be certain if the deter-
mination is correct. They have a number of similarities with A. andamanen-
Sis.
BIOLOGY. Larvae have been collected in ground pools and in puddles.
Adults were caught in the jungle in Thailand. Barraud (1934) gives no informa-
tion on the specimens from India.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) CAUTUS Barraud
(Figures 18, 20)
«Aedes (Aedes) cautus Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 16: 368 (?*c"*).
A fairly large, blackish brown species. The terminalia are particularly
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 13
distinctive by the lobed lateral corners of the female postatrial sclerite and by
the forked paraproct and strongly produced toothed apex of the male basimere.
The larva and pupa are not known. Other distinguishing characters are as fol-
lows:
FEMALE. Head.’ Vertex blackish brown, with a few pale scales at the
middle and on occiput, and small patches of pale scales on both sides; torus
bare; palpus about 1/6 the length of the proboscis, dark brown; proboscis
about as long as fore femur, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal scales dark brown,
with some golden scales along the anterior margin; anterior pronotal lobe with
a row of 8-9 bristles, without scales; posterior part of pronotum with a few
brown curved scales and 5-6 bristles; postspiracular area with 3-4 bristles,
without scales. Sternopleuron with a small patch of pale scales on the lower
portion, a larger patch above and a row of 9-10 bristles extending downward
behind this scale patch; lower mesepimeron bare, a few hairs present behind
the upper white scale patch; propleuron with a patch of pale scales below and
a row of bristles above; metameron bare. Wing. Alula fringed with broad
scales. Legs. Dark brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxa mostly
brown scaled, with a small pale spot above; mid and hind coxae each with a
small patch of pale scales; hind claws equal, simple; fore and mid claws
equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen. Terga dark, with the lateral pale
patches sometimes produced on to dorsum; sterna pale scaled basally.
Terminalia. As in figure 18. Three unequal, pear-shaped spermathecae;
cercus rather short; postgenital plate broad, with a shallow median emargina-
tion; postatrial sclerite wide, with lobed lateral corners, flat or lobed medial-
ly; postatrial plate with numerous fine hairs along the margin of the opening;
preatrial plate hairy, narrowly elongate with rounded basal margin, almost
completely divided.
MALE. Description based on the type specimens at the British Museum.
Similar to female in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws equal, simple; fore
and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As in figure 20,
the figure copied from Barraud (1928, fig. 21). I have examined the type male
terminalia and they are essentially as figured by Barraud. Basimere strongly
produced apically into 4 or 5 tooth-like processes, with many strong bristles
and 4 strong large spines on the inner mesal margin; distimere swollen pre-
apically, pointed apically and with a long seta at apical 1/3; paraproct divided
into 2 unequal slender processes; aedeagus short, of the andamanensis type.
LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. I Select here as lectotype a male, terminalia on a slide
in the British Museum with the following data: '"Type/Bombay, Deccan, Tavar-
gatti, INDIA/P. J. Barraud/mid August 1921". Paratypes: 2 females, 1 male,
terminalia in celluloid mount on pin, same data as lectotype.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 1 female, Chiang Mai; 2 females, Khon
Kaen, Tham Pho Ti Yan; 3 females, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Ban Nabon.
Other distribution. INDIA, NORTH BORNEO **, MALAYA (Stone ef# al 1959).
BIOLOGY. The adults have been reared from larvae collected in jungle
pools (Barraud 1934: 288). Females have been reported to bite man.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) CLAVATUS Barraud
(Figure 17)
Aedes (Aedes) clavatus Barraud 1931, Indian J. med. Res. 19: 614 (<*);
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 294 (‘*).
This species is distinguished by having a divided paraproct of the male
terminalia and by the characteristic structure of the female postatrial and pre-
atrial plates, as figured. Other distinguishing characters are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark brown, with pale golden scales on both
Sides; many upright dark brown scales mixed with some pale broad scales on
the occiput; torus with some small broad brown scales on inner side; palpus
brown, about 1/8 the length of the proboscis; proboscis rather stout, dark
brown, about as long as fore femur. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales red-
dish to dark brown; anterior pronotal lobe with 5-6 strong bristles and a few
short setae; posterior part of pronotum with some curved narrow scales and 4
bristles posteriorly; postspiracular area with 3-4 bristles, without scales;
small patches of pale scales on upper and lower sternopleuron and on upper
meSepimeron; a row of 8-10 weak bristles behind the pale scale patch on upper
sternopleuron, the anterior portion of sternopleuron bare; lower mesepimeron
bare, afew hairs present behind the pale scale patch; metameron bare; pro-
pleuron with some pale scales below. Wing. Alula fringed with broad scales.
Legs. Dark brown, the femora extensively pale ventrally; fore coxal scale
patch mostly brown; mid coxa with a small patch of pale scales; no scales on
hind coxa; hind claws equal, simple; fore and mid claws equal, each claw
toothed. Abdomen. Terga blackish scaled, with the pale lateral patches
sometimes produced on to dorsum on terga VI-VII; sterna mostly pale scaled.
Terminalia. As in figure 17. Three unequal spermathecae, each with a small
short neck; cercus rather short; postgenital plate short, with a shallow median
emargination; postatrial sclerite rounded; postatrial plate very characteristic,
with many long coarse hairs around the opening; preatrial plate weakly scler-
otized at the middle, with a pair of sclerotized transverse ridges across the
: plate and a pair of additional elongate platelets on each side, not hairy.
‘ta MALE. Similar to female in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws equal,
Simple; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As
in figure 17. Basimere broadly produced distally ending in a small knob-like
process and with a short pointed subapical internal projection; distimere
curved distally, notched at tip and with many setae at the distal curved portion;
aedeagus well sclerotized, large, of the andamanensis type; paraproct divided
into 2 processes.
LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. I have seen the type male in the British Museum, with the
terminalia on slide. Type locality: Sukna, North Bengal, Darjeeling District,
INDIA.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 3 males, 1 female, Satun, Baraket; 1
female, Trang, Muang; 2 males, 4 females, Chon Buri, Khao Mai Keo; 1
female, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Khao Luang. Other distribution. I have also
seen specimens from INDIA and VIETNAM **.
BIOLOGY. The adults have been collected in rain forests in baited traps,
the kind of bait unknown.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) CRETATUS, n. sp.
(Figures 5, 6)
Species with banded abdominal terga; male fore and mid claws unequal
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya)of Thailand 15
with both claws toothed, basimere with 2 well differentiated apical projections,
a large peg-like process and 1 or 2 spines near the base; female postatrial
plate with a pair of wing-like lateral structures. The larva is distinguished by
the very long anal gills and by the single prothoracic hair 9,10,12-P. The
pupa has weak abdominal’hair 2 on all segments. Other differentiating charac-
ters are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark, with small patches of pale broad scales
at the middle, occiput and sides, pale lanceolate scales around the eye margin
and a few dark brown upright scales confined to the occiput; torus with small
dark scales on inner side; palpus about 1/8 the length of the proboscis, brown;
proboscis about as long as fore femur, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal and
scutellar scales brown to golden brown; anterior pronotal lobe with 4 strong
bristles and 5 or 6 short hairs, without scales; posterior part of pronotum
with a few scattered narrow curved scales and 5 or 6 weak bristles; post-
spiracular area with 6 or 7 weak bristles, without scales; only a few pale
scales present on lower sternopleuron, 4 or 5 bristles and a few hairs behind
the upper pale scale patch, 2-4 fine hairs on the anterior portion; lower
mesepimeron bare, the few hairs behind the pale scale patch extending down-
wards to the middle of the sclerite; metameron bare; propleuron with more
bristles.than scales. Wing. Alula fringed with brown lanceolate scales.
Legs. Largely brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch most-
ly brown; mid coxa with a few pale scales; hind coxa without scales; hind claws
simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, both claws toothed. Abdomen. Terga
brown with complete pale basal bands which may be broken dorsally; sterna
mainly pale scaled. Terminalia. As in figure 5. One large and 2 smaller
spermathecae, each with a long neck; cercus elongate; postgenital plate broad,
with a deep median emargination; postatrial sclerite convex; postatrial plate
with characteristic lateral wing-like structures and fine hairs along the basal
margin of the opening; preatrial plate composed of a pair of hairy, elongate
platelets and a much smaller pair laterally.
MALE. Similar to female in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws
simple, equal; fore and mid claws unequal with both claws toothed.
Terminalia. As in figure 6. Basimere with 2 well differentiated apical
projections, one of which is long and slender while the other short, stout and
hairy, a large peg-like process and 1 or 2 large spines on the inner margin
near the base; distimere slender, curved distally; aedeagus simple, of the
andamanensis type; paraproct slender, tapered distally.
LARVA. As in figure 5. Description and figure based on a male para-
type cast skin. Head. Hair 1-C long and stout; 4-C small, a short branched
tuft with 5-6 branches; 5-C with 3-5 barbed branches; 6-C with 3 barbed
branches, the middle branch usually stronger and longer; 7-C with 9-12
barbed branches; 8-C double, simple; mental plate with about 40 lateral teeth;
antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted at about middle of the shaft, with 3
branches; 2-A long and stout; 4-A slender and shorter than 2-A; 3-A minute;
6-A about half as long as 4-A. Thorax. Hair 1-P single; 2,3-P with 2 and 3
branches respectively; 9,10,12-P single. Abdomen. Hair 6-I-II double,
single on the following segments; 7-I single, with 4 or 5 progressively short
branches on other segments; segment VIII with 10 pointed comb scales, each
scale fringed laterally; hair 1-VIOI with 5-7 barbed branches; 2-VIII double or
triple; 3,5-VII with 6-8 barbed branches; 4-VIII double, simple; siphon
swollen basally, with 12-14 pecten teeth, the last 2 distal teeth widely spaced
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
and each tooth simple or with a very small lateral denticle, the last tooth in-
serted just beyond the middle of the siphon; siphonal tuft with 3 weak branches;
saddle incomplete; hair 1-X single or double; 2-X with 6-8 branches; 3-X
single; anal gills long and slender, about 4 times the length of the saddle; 2 or
3 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 6. Description and figure based on a male paratype
cast skin. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C single; 10-C with 3 or 4 strong branches;
11-C single; 12-C with 1-3 branches. Abdomen. Hair 2 normal on all seg-
ments; 3-I with 2 or 3 long branches, rather close to 2-I, single on II-III; 4-
VII-VII double; 7-I double; 5-IJI-V, single on VI-VU; 9-VII single or forked at
the tip, poorly developed on other segments except on VII where it is fairly
long. Paddles. Outer margin serrated; hair 1-P simple.
TYPE DATA. Holotype male, THAILAND: Khon kaen, Tham Pho Ti
Yan, T-1822-5, 1962, terminalia on slide. Allotype female, Nakhon Ratchas-
ima, Koraj Tha Klong, T-9338, 1962, terminalia on slide. Paratypes 7
females, 1 male, Kanchanaburi, Khao Salak Phra, 1965; 1 female, Chiang
Mai, Huey Chang Kien, 1962; 1 female, same locality as allotype; 2 males,
Chon Buri, Kasemsan waterfalls; 2 males, Nakhon Nayok, Khao Ta Kor, 1963;
2 males, same locality as holotype. Male holotype No. 69210, female allo-
type, 3 male and 3 female paratypes in the U. S. National Museum. 3 female
and 2 male paratypes in the British Museum (Natural History). 3 female and
2 male paratypes in the B. P. Bishop Museum.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
BIOLOGY. The larvae have been collected in flood pools in rain forest.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) CYRTOLABIS Edwards
(Figure 7)
Aedes (Aedes) cyrtolabis Edwards 1928, Bull. ent. Res. 18: 273 (<*);
Edwards and Given 1928, Bull. ent. Res. 18: 344 (L*). :
Species having numerous hairs on the lower mesepimeron. The record
from Thailand is based on a single male specimen with an associated pupal
skin collected in a tree hole. It is easily recognized by the marked develop-
ment of the paraproct of the male terminalia, and by the abdominal hair 9-VII-
VIII of the pupa which has 4 and 10 branches respectively. The female is not
known. The species is further characterized by the following:
MALE. Head. Vertex dark, with a few pale scales on the occiput,
around the eye margin and on sides; torus cannot be seen; palpus very short,
about 1/10 the length of the proboscis; proboscis slightly longer than fore
femur, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales reddish to dark
brown; anterior pronotal lobe with a row of 5 bristles, without scales; posteri-
or part of pronotum with a few scattered dark brown, narrowed curved scales
and 4 bristles; postspiracular area with 4 bristles, without scales; sterno-
pleuron with small patches of pale scales, numerous fine hairs mixed with the
lower scale patch, a row of 7-8 bristles on the upper scale patch and some
fine hairs on the anterior portion; lower part of meSepimeron with numerous
fine hairs which extend downwards almost to the suture; metameron bare;
propleuron with some pale scales and weak bristles. Wing. Alula fringed
with broad scales. Legs. Dark brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxa
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand Pe
brown scaled, with a small pale spot above; mid coxa with a few pale scales;
hind coxa without scales; mid and hind claws missing; fore claws unequal, the
larger claw with a large tooth. Abdomen. Terga dark dorsally, with pale
lateral patches; sterna with basal patches of pale scales. Terminalia. As in
figure 7. Basimere with a short apical projection and a smaller subapical
thumb-like process; distimere large, swollen distally; aedeagus long and sim-
ple; paraproct markedly large, long and sinuous; tergum IX wedge-shaped at
the middle.
FEMALE. Unknown.
LARVA. The following brief description was taken from Edwards and
Given (1928: 344-345). Head. Hair 1-C long and slender; 4-C very small,
branched; 5,6-C each with 3 branches; 7-C with 10 branches; mental plate with
about 20 lateral teeth; antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted before the middle of
the shaft, with 4-6 branches. Abdomen. Hair 6-I double; 2-II-VII single; seg-
ment VOI with 6-8 sharply pointed comb scales, each scale finely fringed;
Siphon slightly broadened to near middle, with about 12 pecten teeth, most of
which have 1 or 2 strong basal denticles, the distal 3 teeth simple and more
widely separated, the last tooth inserted a little beyond the middle of the
siphon; siphonal tuft with about 4 branches; saddle incomplete, its posterior
edge smooth; hair 1-X simple and rather small; anal gills very long, over 3
times as long as the saddle.
PUPA. As in figure 7. Description and figure based on a single cast
skin. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C single and very long; 10-C with 4 weak
branches; 11-C single; 12-C with 6 long branches. Abdomen. Hair 3-I-II
double and very close to 2-I-II; 2-I-II fairly long, shorter on other segments;
5-IV double, single on V-VI; 6-VII branched; 9-VII-VIII with 5 and 10 dendritic
branches respectively. Paddles. Distal margin finely serrated; hair 1-P
simple. |
TYPE DATA. I have seen the type male on a slide in the British Muse-
um. Type locality: SINGAPORE.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 1 male with an associated pupal skin,
Nakhon Nayok, Khao Yai. Other distribution. SINGAPORE.
BIOLOGY. Edwards and Given (1928: 345) record the larval habitat as
mangrove area. The single specimen from Thailand was collected in a tree
hole.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) DERMAJOENSIS Brug
(Figure 8)
Aedes (Aedes) dermajoensis Brug 1931, Tijdschr. Ent. 74: 250 (o*).
A small dark species with pale basal bands on the abdominal terga. The
fore and mid claws are unequal with both claws toothed. The basimere is
projected apically into a short pointed process, with 1 or 2 short subapical
spines and 2 long spines near the base. The pupa has abdominal hair 2-III-VI
spine-like. The female and larva are not known. Other distinguishing char-
acteristics are as follows:
MALE. Head. Vertex blackish brown, with pale lateral patches anda
few upright dark scales on the occiput; torus bare; palpus very short, about
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
1/10 the length of the proboscis, dark brown; proboscis longer than fore femur
by the length of the labella, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales
dark to reddish brown; anterior pronotal lobe with a row of 5 or 6 bristles,
without scales; posterior part of pronotum with 3 or 4 bristles, without scales;
upper and lower sternopleuron with small patches of broad pale scales; lower
meSepimeron bare, a few hairs present behind the pale scale patch; metameron
bare; propleuron with a small patch of pale scales. Wing. Alula fringed with
broad dark brown scales. Legs. Dark scaled, the femora pale ventrally;
hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws unequal, both claws toothed; fore
coxal scale patch mainly brown; mid coxa with a patch of white scales; hind
coxa without scales. Abdomen. With pale basal bands on terga II-VI; sterna
dark scaled apically. Terminalia. As in figure 8. Basimere projected
apically into a short pointed process, with 1 or 2 subapical spines and 2 long
dark spines near the base; distimere swollen at the middle, abruptly tapered
to a pointed bent tip, with some setae at the swollen portion; aedeagus small,
very simple; paraproct relatively short, enlarged at the base, tapered distally.
FEMALE and LARVA. Unknown.
PUPA. As in figure 8. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Cephalothorax. Respiratory trumpet slender, cylindrical; hair 3-C with 4
branches; 10-C with 3-5 branches; 11-C single; 12-C with 5-6 short branches.
Abdomen. Hair 2-III-VI spine-like; 3-I with 3-4 branches, very long and
single on II-III; 5-IV-VI single, very long; 6-I-I[, VI-VII single, double or 3-
branched on III-V; 7-III, IV branched; 9- VIII long and single, very small on
other segments. Paddles. Outer margin with sharp serrations; hair 1-P
Simple.
TYPE DATA. I have seen the type male in the British Museum, the
terminalia and hind tarsal claws in celluloid mount on pin. Type locality:
Benkulen, SUMATRA. The specimen is in very poor condition, much of the
head is destroyed and only 1 fore leg is intact.’
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 3 males, each with associated pupal
skins, Songkhla, Haad Yai. Other distribution. SUMATRA.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The Thailand specimens agree with Brug's
figure of the terminalia and the type specimen except for the dark abdominal
terga with small pale lateral patches.
BIOLOGY. Brug (1931: 250) records that this species was bred from a
larva found in a forest pool. The Thailand specimens were collected in pools
in a stream bed.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) DUX Dyar and Shannon
(Figures 9, 10)
Aedes (Aedes) dux Dyar and Shannon 1925, Insec. Inscit. menst. 13: 81 (<¢);
Laffoon 1946, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36: 233 (“*?*L*).
Aedes (Aedes) sigmoides Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 16: 373 (?*);
Causey 1937, Amer. J. Hyg. 25: 414 (synonymy); Iyengar and Menon
1956, Bull. ent. Res. 47: 789 (*).
Aedes (Aedes) macrodixoa (female only) of Bohart 1945, U. S. Navmed 580:
65.
On the basis of the structures of the female and male terminalia, A.
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 19
dux can be readily separated from all other known species. The female post-
atrial plate is particularly distinctive by having a pair of lateral finger-like,
hairy processes. The male basimere is very short and projects laterally
towards the inner margin. The larva has very short gills and fewer pecten
teeth. The pupa has poorly developed abdominal hair 2-I-VII, long and single
7-I. Other distinguishing characteristics are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex blackish brown, with small patches of pale
scales at the middle and sides, some scattered ones on the occiput and upright
dark scales behind the occiput; torus with a few fine hairs; palpus dark brown,
about 1/8 the length of the proboscis; proboscis dark brown, longer than fore
femur by the length of the labella. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales uni-
formly dark brown; anterior pronotal lobe with 4 strong and 5-6 weak bristles,
without scales; posterior part of pronotum with some narrow, dark curved
scales and 5-6 bristles; postspiracular area with 10-12 bristles, without
scales; sternopleuron and upper part of mesepimeron with small patch of
white scales, 8 bristles behind the upper scale patch on the sternopleuron,
and no hairs on the anterior portion of sternopleuron; lower part of mesepim-
eron bare, the mesepimeral hairs confined to the area behind the scale patch;
metameron bare; propleuron with 4-5 bristles and a small patch of white
scales. Wing. Alula fringed with brown lanceolate scales. Legs. Dark
brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch brown, with a small
pale spot above; mid and hind coxae each with a row of white scales; hind
claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen.
Terga dark brown or with pale brown lateral patches, sometimes a small
lateral spot of almost whitish scales may be present on tergum I; sterna
brown. Terminalia. As infigure 9. Three unequal spermathecae, each with
a long neck; cercus rather short; postgenital plate almost conical, with a deep
median emargination; postatrial sclerite rounded; postatrial plate quite sim-
ple, with a pair of hairy lateral finger-like processes; preatrial plate repre-
sented by 2 small separated curved structures.
MALE. Essentially similar to female. Legs. Hind tarsal claws sim-
ple, equal; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia.
As in figure 10. Basimere very short and projecting laterally towards the
inner margin, with a long subapical process and a shorter curved spine; dis-
timere swollen at the base, tapering to a curved tip, with some setae at the
middle; aedeagus very simple; paraproct slender, joined distally.
LARVA. As in figure 9. Head. Hair 1-C long, fairly stout; 3-C small;
4-C with 5-6 very short weak branches; 5, 6-C each with 3 or 4 long barbed
branches; 7-C with 7-9 long barbed branches; 8-C with 2 or 3 short branches;
antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted a little below the middle, with 6-8 finely
barbed branches; 2-A long; 4-A slender and shorter than 2-A; 3-A minute;
6-A shorter than 4-A; mental plate with 18-21 lateral teeth. Thorax. Hair
1-P single; 2-P double; 3-P with 2 or 3 branches; 9,10,12-P single. Abdo-
men. Hair 6-I-II double, single on II-VI; 7-I single, with 4 short weak
branches on II and much shorter branches on IIJ-V; segment VIII with 10-12
comb scales, each scale pointed and finely fringed; hair 1-VIII with 3-5
barbed branches; 2-VIII double, simple; 3- VII with 6-7 long, barbed
branches; 4-VIII single, simple; 5-VIII with 8-10 barbed branches; siphon
with 10-12 pecten teeth, each tooth with 2 or 3 lateral denticles, the last
tooth inserted at about the middle of the siphon; siphonal tuft with 4-6 long
branches; saddle incomplete, the integument minutely spinose; hair 1-X sin-
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
gle; 2-X with 4-6 branches; 3-X single; anal gills short, as long as the saddle;
2 or 3 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 10. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C single; 10-C with
5-8 branches; 11-C single; 12-C with 3 long branches. Abdomen. Hair 3-I with
2 or 3 branches, single on II-III; 2-I-VI weak, very small; 4-VI, VII single;
5-IV-VIL double; 6-I-II, VI-VIL single; 7-I single; 7-V-VII single; 9- VII fairly
long, Single; 9-VIII single. Paddles. Outer margin finely serrated; hair 1-P
Simple.
TYPE DATA. Aedes dux Dyar and Shannon, holotype male in the U. S.
National Museum; type locality: PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. Aedes (Aedes)
sigmoides Barraud, type female in the British Museum; type locality: ANDA-
MAN ISLANDS.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 1 male, 3 females, 4 associated pupal
skins, Samut Prakan; 1 male, 9 females, Phra Nakhon, Bangkok; 1 male, 1
female, Chanthaburi, Kaeo Khao Phloi Waen; 1 female, Ranong, Muang; 2
larvae and 1 cast skin (Philippines). Other distribution. I have seen speci-
mens from the PHILIPPINES, INDOCHINA, JAVA and ANDAMAN JIS. Stone
et al. (1959) record it from HAINAN ISLAND.
BIOLOGY. The adults have been collected in a crab hole (as sigmoides)
and at light traps. Larvae were found in foot prints in ricefields near man-
grove Swamps, in a salt marsh and in brackish water.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) GIBBOSUS, n. sp.
(Figures 11, 20)
A species having fine hairs on the metameron and lower meSepimeron.
It is differentiated by the markedly swollen distimere and strongly produced
\basimere of the male terminalia, and by the scalloped or sculptured anterior
margin of the female postatrial plate. The pupa has small and poorly devel-
oped abdominal hair 2-I-VII and branched 6-VII. The larva is not known.
Other distinguishing characters are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Blackish brown, with pale patches on both sides, and
a few upright dark scales confined to the occiput; torus with small dark brown
scales; palpus about 1/8 the length of the proboscis, dark brown; proboscis
longer than fore femur by the tip of the labella. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar
scales mostly reddish or dark brown; anterior pronotal lobe with 8 strong
bristles and a few short hairs; posterior part of pronotum with narrow curved
brown scales and a row of 5-6 strong bristles; postspiracular area with 4
bristles, without scales; sternopleuron with scattered fine hairs on the anteri-
or portion, a large pale and brown scale patch and about 18 bristles on the
posterior area; meSepimeron with numerous hairs behind the pale scale patch,
these continuing downwards to lower portion of the sclerite; propleuron with a
row of bristles above and a patch of pale scales below; metameron with fine
hairs. Wing. Alula fringed with dark brown broad scales. Legs. Dark
brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxal scales all dark brown; mid and
hind coxae each with patches of white scales; hind claws simple, equal; fore
and mid claws equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen. Dark dorsally, with pale
lateral patches; sterna largely pale with brown apices. Terminalia. As in
figure 20. Cercus rather narrow; postgenital plate broad with a wide, deep
emargination; postatrial sclerite rather poorly sclerotized, convex medially
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 21
and with strongly lobed lateral corners; postatrial plate distinctive, the apical
margin of the opening scalloped or sculptured, the basal half with many short
hairs; preatrial plate hairy, deeply emarginate basally; three unequal sperma-
thecae, each with a narrow neck. ;
MALE. Essentially similar to female. Legs. Hind claws simple,
equal; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As
in figure 11. Basimere with 1 long strongly produced tapered process which is
strongly bent before the apex and a much shorter process on the inner margin
bearing a large spine and a subapical lobe with 3 or 4 spines; distimere large,
expanded apically and with a pointed tip at one angle; aedeagus fairly simple;
paraproct long and tapered distally.
LARVA. Unknown.
PUPA. As in figure 11. Description and figure based on a single cast
skin. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C double; 10-C with 4 branches; 11-C single;
12-C missing. Abdomen. Hair 3-I double, single on II-III; 2-I-II fairly long,
small and poorly developed on other segments; 5-III-IV with 3 branches, double
on V, single on VI-VII; 6-VII very small, branched; 9-VII fairly short; 9- VIII
single, poorly developed on other segments. Paddles. With finely serrated.
margin; hair 1-P simple.
TYPE DATA. Holotype male, with pupal cast skin, THAILAND:
Songkhla, Haad Yai, S187-138, 1963, terminalia on slides. Paratypes, 3
males, 9 females, MALAYA: Rantaw Panjang, Selangor, 10. ii.1953, 4. iii.
1953, 26. xi. 1953 (J. A. Reid); 1 female, terminalia on slide, JAVA: Pagar
Dewa, 27. xii. 1958. Holotype male, 1 male and 3 female paratypes in the U.
S. National Museum (no. 69211). Two male and 7 female paratypes in the
British Museum (Natural History) London.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND, MALAYA and JAVA.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. On the basis of the external characters A.
gibbosus is very Similar to A. singulavis except that in singularis the meta-
meron is bare and the terminalia are markedly distinct.
BIOLOGY. The larvae were collected in ground pools among nipa palms
and in puddles.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) HISPIDUS, n. sp.
(Figure 18)
Species having pale subbasal bands on abdominal terga and broad pale
scales on the postspiracular area. The female terminalia have markedly
large preatrial plates. The male, larva and pupa are not known.
FEMALE. Head. Vertex largely dark brown, with a few pale narrow
scales from its middle to occiput and around the eye margin, small patches of
pale broad scales laterally and some dark upright ones confined to the occiput;
torus with a few broad scales and fine hairs on the inner side; palpus about 1/8
the length of the proboscis, dark brown; proboscis slightly shorter than, or
about as long as fore femur. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales brown to
golden; anterior pronotal lobe covered with narrow golden scales and bristles;
posterior part of pronotum with golden curved narrow scales and 4-5 bristles;
postspiracular area with broad white scales and 5-6 bristles; sternopleuron
with 2 large patches of white scales, a row of 8-9 bristles posteriorly, and no
hairs on the anterior portion; lower part of mesepimeron bare; metameron
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
bare; propleuron with a group of bristles above and a small patch of pale scales
below. Wing. Alula fringed with narrow scales. Legs. Brown, the femora
pale ventrally. Fore coxal scale patch broadly brown at the middle, white
scaled below and above; mid coxa with a patch of white scales; hind coxa with-
out scales; hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw
toothed. Abdomen. Terga II-VI with complete subbasal pale bands, broken
on VII, continuous on VIII, each band connected to the pale lateral patches;
sterna pale or yellowish at basal half, brown apically. Terminalia. As in
figure 18. Three unequal spermathecae, each with a short neck; cercus elon-
gate; postgenital plate deeply emarginate; postatrial sclerite convex; post-
atrial plate with fairly long and thick hairs along the margin of the opening;
preatrial plate divided, very large and hairy.
MALE, LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype female, THAILAND: Udorn (Udon Thani), Nong
Bua Sampor, T-3184, 1962, terminalia on slide 2. iii. 66 (fore claws missing).
Paratypes, 2 females, Ubol (Ubon Ratchathani), Boundary Chong Mek, T-870,
1963; Chiang Mai, Klong Loi, T-1788, 1962, both terminalia on slides. Fe-
male holotype and 1 female paratype in the U. S. National Museum (no. 69212);
1 female paratype in the British Museum (Natural History).
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. A. hispidus is very similar to A. indicus in
general habitus, from which hispidus differs in the details of the structure of
the female terminalia.
BIOLOGY. Unknown.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) INCERTUS Edwards
(Figures 12, 13)
Atoretomyia taeniata Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 190 (name preoccupied).
Aedes (Aedes) incertus Edwards 1922a, Indian J. med. Res. 10: 264 (nom.
nov. for taeniata Leicester 1908); King and Hoogstraal 1947, J. Wash.
Acad. Sci. 37: 115 (taxonomy).
A. incertus can be distinguished from most other species by the simple
pocket- shaped postatrial plate of the female terminalia. The larval siphon
has fewer pecten teeth, at most 10, and the prothoracic hair 9-P is branched.
The pupa has spine-like abdominal hair 2-II-VI and branched 6-VII. Other
distinguishing characters of the species are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark, with some narrow pale scales at the
middle and around the eye margin, small patches of pale scales laterally and
dark upright scales confined to the occiput; torus with small dark scales on
the inner side; palpus about 1/6 the length of the proboscis, dark brown;
proboscis rather stout, about as long as fore femur, dark brown. Thorax.
Scutal and scutellar scales uniformly reddish brown; anterior pronotal lobe
with bristles, without scales; posterior part of pronotum with a few narrow
reddish brown scales and 4 bristles posteriorly; postspiracular area with 3 or
4 bristles; sternopleuron with small patches of white scales rather loosely ar-
ranged and a row of 10-11 bristles behind the upper pale scale patch, without
hairs on the anterior portion; meSepimeron hairs confined to the area behind
the pale scale patch, lower part of mesepimeron without hairs; metameron
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 23
bare; propleuron with a small patch of loose scales and a row of 5 bristles.
Wing. Alula fringed with dark brown narrow scales. Legs. Dark brown, the
femora extensively pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch mostly brown, witha
few pale scales above; mid coxa with a row of white scales; hind coxa without
scales; hind tarsal claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw
toothed. Abdomen. Terga dark brown, with some pale scales dorsally but usu-
ally dark in most specimens, with definite pale lateral patches; sterna pale
scaled, the apices appearing brownish. Terminalia. As infigure 12. Three
unequal spermathecae, each with a long narrow neck; cercus short; postgenital
plate broad, with a very shallow emargination; postatrial sclerite rounded;
postatrial plate simple, represented by a pocket-shaped structure with a pair
of lateral arms, no hairs; preatrial plate small, poorly sclerotized, rounded
and hairy. |
MALE. Uncertain; the single male recorded from Merauke by Edwards
(1922b: 468, terminalia not described) seems doubtful (King and Hoogstraal
1947: 115).
LARVA. As in figure 12. Head. Hair 1-C long and stout; 4-C small,
with 5 or 6 short weak branches; 5-C with 3-4 long barbed branches; 6-C with
2-3 long barbed branches; 7-C with 9-11 barbed branches; 8-C with 3 weak
branches; antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted slightly below the middle of the
shaft, with 4-6 long barbed branches; 2-A stout, long; 4-A slender, shorter
than 2-A; 3-A much shorter and smaller than 6-A; mental plate with about 36
lateral teeth. Thorax. Hair 1-P single, long; 2-P double or forked; 3-P
double; 9-P with 3 branches, 10,12-P single. Abdomen. Hair 6-I-II double,
single on segments II-VI; 7-I single, with 5 short branches on II, much
shorter on the following segments; segment VIII with 8-10 pointed comb scales,
each scale with a fine lateral fringe; hair 1-VIII with 8 barbed branches; 2-VIII
with 3 long simple branches; 3-VIII with 8 barbed and longer branches; 4-VIII
double, simple; 5-VIII with 8-10 barbed branches; 7-III-V branched; siphon
fairly stout, evenly tapering, with 8-10 pecten teeth, the 2 distal teeth widely
spaced, simple or with a small lateral denticle, the last tooth inserted a little
beyond the middle of the siphon; siphonal tuft with 3-4 weak branches; saddle
incomplete; hair 1-X double, long; 2-X with 9 long branches; 3-X single; anal
gills long, more than twice the length of the saddle; 2 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 13. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C with 4 branches;
10-C with 3 short branches; 11-C single; 12-C with 6-8 rather weak short
branches. Abdomen. Hair 3-I with 2 or 3 branches, single and long on II-III,
rather close to 2-I; 2-II-VI spine-like, fairly weak on other segments; 5-IV-
VI long, single; 6-VII branched; 9-VII single and long, poorly developed on
other segments. Paddles. With finely serrated margin; hair 1-P simple.
TYPE DATA. TI select as lectotype a female in the British Museum
labeled cotype of A. taeniata, with the following data: "Jungle 5th mile Gom-
bak Rd. /Kuala Lumpur/midday/29/2/04. Kuala Lumpur, FEDERATED
MALAY STATES/Dr. G. F. Leicester/1912-350", terminalia mounted in
celluloid on pin. The specimen is in a very poor condition, 3 legs and abdo-
men are mounted on board, the head and wings are missing and the thorax is
badly broken.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 9 females and 8 associated larval and
pupal skins, Songkhla, Haad Yai. Other distribution. MALAYA, BORNEO
(Edwards 1922b), and JAVA **.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. On the basis of the simple structures of the
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
female terminalia A. incertus could be confused with females of Verrallina. It
differs, however, by the pointed comb teeth of the larva and by certain charac-
ters of the adult as noted above.
BIOLOGY. Adults have been bred from larvae collected in pools ina
stream bed.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) INDICUS (Theobald)
(Figures 18, 20)
Neomacleaya indica Theobald 1907, Mon. Cul. 4: 238 (9).
Aedes (Aedes) indicus (Theobald), Edwards 1922a, Indian J. med. Res. 10:
264 (key); Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 16: 366 (?*o*); Barraud
1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 283 (o*?*L).
Skusea mediofasciata Theobald 1907, Mon. Cul. 4: 544 (o*¢*).
The female of this species has banded abdominal terga and curved nar-
row scales on the postspiracular area; the large spermatheca has a markedly
swollen neck and the preatrial plate is divided into 2 darkly pigmented rounded
pieces. The male terminalia and larva have been described and figured by
Barraud (1934: 284-285, figs. 68b and 69). The figures are copied here as in
figure 20. The pupa is not known. Other characteristics of the species are as
follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark brown, with a small spot of narrow gold-
en scales at the middle and occiput, small patches of broad pale scales at the
sides and a few upright ones confined to the occiput; torus with small broad
scales and fine hairs on inner side; proboscis longer than fore femur by the
length of the labella, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales mostly
brown mixed with some golden ones; pleural scales rather loosely arranged;
anterior pronotal lobe covered with short and long bristles; posterior part of
pronotum with narrow curved light brown scales and 5 or 6 bristles; post-
spiracular area with narrow curved golden scales and 4 or 5 bristles; sterno-
pleuron with two small patches of pale scales, 5 or 6 bristles behind the upper
scale patch, and no hairs on its anterior portion; lower part of mesepimeron
bare; metameron bare; propleuron with flat scales and 6 or 7 bristles. Wing.
Alula fringed with narrow or lanceolate scales. Legs. Dark brown, the
femora pale ventrally; fore coxal scale patch mostly brown, with some pale
scales on the top and bottom; mid and hind coxae each with a few pale scales;
hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw toothed. Abdo-
men. With subbasal bands on terga II-IV, broken on V-VI; sterna mostly dark
brown with some scattered pale scales basally. Terminalia. As in figure 18.
Three spermathecae, the larger one with a curved swollen neck and punctate
at the neck region; cercus elongate; postgenital plate rather narrow, deeply
emarginate in Thai specimens, very shallow in 1 specimen from India; post-
atrial sclerite convex; postatrial plate with many long thick hairs along the
posterior half of the opening; preatrial plate divided into 2 rounded pieces,
dark pigmented. |
MALE. According to Barraud (1934: 283) differs from the female by the
lateral pale patches not forming complete bands on the abdominal terga.
Terminalia. As in figure 20, copied from Barraud (1934: 284, fig. 68b). Sim-
ilar to those of A. nigrotarsis from the Philippines. Basimere with a broad,
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand | 25
blunt apical projection and a long slender elbowed process arising at the base;
distimere slender, curved and tapered to a pointed tip, although Barraud de-
scribed and figured it as having a small terminal appendage; aedeagus simple;
paraproct slender, slightly curved and long, pointed distally.
LARVA. As in figure 20, copied from Barraud (1934: 285, fig. 69).
The distinguishing features as figured in Barraud (1934) are as follows: Head.
Hair 5,6-C each with 3 branches with the middle branch stouter; antennal hair
1-A inserted just below the middle of the shaft, with 3 stout branches. Abdo-
men. Segment VIII with 10 comb scales arranged in a row, each scale pointed
and finely fringed to basal 1/2; hair 4-VIII long and single; siphon with 12
pecten teeth, each tooth with 2 small lateral denticles, the last distal tooth
long and widely separated.
PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Neomacleaya indica Theobald, type female in the British
Museum, terminalia not mounted, the hind tarsal claws missing; type locality:
INDIA. Skusea mediofasciata Theobald, type female in the British Museum on
Slide; type locality: INDIA.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 2 females, Chon Buri, Khao Mai Kaeo
and Nakhon Ratchsima, Pak Thong Chai. Other distribution. I have seen
specimens from INDIA and CEYLON.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. I have examined the female type specimens
from India in the British Museum but I have not seen the male ascribed to
indicus. Barraud (1928: 366; 1934: 283) describes and figures the ''clasper (or
style) slender, curved, with a pointed small terminal appendage". I feel Bar-
raud may have made an error about this character. It would certainly appear
that the male belongs to a different group but it is likely that the tip of the
(clasper) distimere was bent and that he mistook it for a terminal appendage.
The structures of the male and female terminalia resemble those of A. nigro-
tarsis but the basal process on the male basimere is long and slender in
indicus, more or less crescentic in nigrotarsis. The female preatrial plate is
entire and well sclerotized in nigrotarsis but rounded and separated in indicus.
Also, usually only the large spermatheca has a swollen, bent neck in indicus.
BIOLOGY. Barraud (1934: 286) records the larval habitat as open pools
and rain-filled ditches.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) INDECORABILIS (Leicester)
(Figures 13, 20)
Verrallina indecorabilis Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 200 (<¢).
Verrallina imitator Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 201 (@); Stone, Knight and
Starcke 1959. Thomas Say Found., Ent. Soc. Amer. 6: 206 (synonymy).
The record of this species in Thailand is based only on 2 slide mounts of
the male terminalia. I have not been able to locate their corresponding bodies.
The following description is based on the type specimens in the British Muse-
um (Natural History), London.
FEMALE. The specimens are in arather poor condition, many of the
scales are rubbed off; those remaining on vertex dark brown, with some pale
scales laterally, 4 or 5 brown upright scales on the occiput; torus with some
flat small narrow scales on the inner side; palpus about 1/8 the length of the
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
proboscis, dark brown; proboscis as long as fore femur, dark brown. Thorax.
With a few reddish brown scutal scales; anterior part of pronotal lobe with 6
bristles, 1 remaining pale broad scale; posterior part of pronotum with 2
bristles, without scales; upper and lower sternopleuron with small patches of
scales and 5 bristles behind the upper scale patch; upper part of mesepimeron
with a small patch of pale scales, without hairs behind this scale patch; lower
part of mesepimeron bare; propleural scales and bristles gone; metameron
bare. Wing. Alula fringed with narrow scales. Legs. Brown; fore coxal
scale patch brown with a small pale spot above; mid coxa with a small pale
spot; hind coxa almost bare; hind claws equal, toothed; fore and mid claws
equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen. Terga brown, sometimes with a few pale
scales laterally; sterna not seen. Terminalia. As in figure 20. Postgenital
plate small, elongate with a shallow emargination; cercus narrow, elongate;
postatrial plate bulbous, simpler than most other species; preatrial plate elon-
gate, hairy and with a large lateral expansion.
MALE. Similar to female in habitus. Legs. Hind tarsal claws equal,
toothed; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As
in figure 13. Basimeres joined together at the subapical portion, bluntly pro-
duced apically; distimere markedly swollen at the middle then abruptly nar-
rowed and curved distally, with many setae at the swollen portion; aedeagus
slender and much elongate; paraproct long, tapered and curved distally.
LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. A. indecorabilis, 1 male and 1 female labeled cotype in
the British Museum. I Select the male as lectotype. It has the following data:
"Larva fr. pool in jungle patch/Gombak Rd. 5 miles fr. Kuala Lumpur/29/2/
04. Kuala Lumpur, FEDERATED MALAY STATES/Dr. G. F. Leicester/
1912-350"'". Terminalia and tarsal claws in celluloid mount on pin, rest of the
body glued on board. A. imitator, 2 females labeled cotype iri the British Mu-
seum. One female selected here as lectotype. It has the following data:
"Jungle 5th mile Gombak Rd/11/2/04. Kuala Lumpur, FEDERATED MALAY
STATES/Dr. G. F. Leicester/1912-350". Terminalia and rest of the abdo-
men in celluloid mount on pin.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 2 slide mounts of male terminalia. Other
distribution. I have seen specimens from MALAYA and NORTH BORNEO ¥*,
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. This species agrees with the descriptions of
uniformis or fragilis except for the details of the terminalia, as noted above.
BIOLOGY. Leicester (1908: 201) records the larvae have been taken in
a small jungle pool.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) LATIPENNIS, n. sp.
(Figures 14, 15)
This species is readily differentiated from most other species by the
characters of the terminalia: the male paraproct is broad and with 2 long
bristles, and the distimere has a crescentic process at the base; the female
postatrial plate is lightly sclerotized and covered with short hairs. The larva
can be recognized by the well developed abdominal hair 1, 3,5-VII and by the
branched thoracic hair 1-P; the pupa has abdominal hair 2-I-VII spine-like.
Other characteristics are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex mostly dark brown, with pale scales along the
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 27
eye margin and occiput; torus with some fine hairs and small, broad dark
scales; palpus dark brown, about 1/8 the length of the proboscis; proboscis
brown, longer than fore femur by the length of the labella. Thorax. Scutal
and scutellar scales uniformly dark reddish brown; anterior pronotal lobe with
4 or 5 bristles, without scales; posterior part of pronotum with reddish brown,
narrow curved scales and 5 bristles; postspiracular area with 5 or 6 bristles,
without scales; sternopleuron with a few fine hairs on the anterior portion and
patches of pale scales on the upper and lower areas, the lower scale patch
mixed with some fine hairs; lower part of mesSepimeron bare, the many fine
hairs behind the upper scale patch extending downwards only to the middle of
the sclerite; metameron bare; propleuron with some pale scales and bristles.
Wing. Alula fringed with rather broad scales. Legs. Dark reddish brown,
the femora pale striped for most of their length; fore coxal scale patch blackish
brown, a few pale ones above; mid and hind coxae each with some pale scales;
hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw toothed. Abdo-
men. Terga blackish brown dorsally, with pale lateral patches; sterna mostly
pale scaled. Terminalia. As in figure 14. Three unequal spermathecae,
each with a short neck; cercus long and slender; postgenital plate longer than
wide, with a deep median emargination; postatrial sclerite rounded; postatrial
plate lightly sclerotized, covered mostly with short branched hairs; preatrial
plate markedly large, more or less separated, with fine hairs on most of the
surface.
MALE. Similar to female in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws sim-
ple; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As in
figure 15. Basimere with a group of strong bristles apically, a three-pronged
process on the inner mesal margin, a long slender process arising from the
base and a small hairy lobe at the base; distimere tapered distally, witha
crescentic process at the base and a row of strong bristles at the middle;
aedeagus simple, elongate; paraproct broad, flattened and with 2 long bristles.
LARVA. As in figure 14. Description and figure based on cast skins of
paratypes. Head. Hair 1-C fairly stout; 4-C with 4 weak branches, very
small; 5-C with 1-3 strong barbed branches; 6-C with 1-4 strong barbed
branches, if 3-branched the middle branch usually longer and stronger; 7-C
with 8 shorter branches; 8-C with 3 long simple branches; mental plate with
36-38 lateral teeth; antenna spinose; hair 1-A inserted below the middle of
the shaft, with 5 barbed branches; 2-A long; 4-A slender, shorter than 2-A;
3,6-A very short. Thorax. Hair 1-P double: 2,3-P each with 3 or 4 branch-
es; 9-P with 3 branches; 10,12-P single. Abdomen. Hair 6-I-II normally
double, single on III-VI; 7-I single, with 4 or 5 shorter branches on II, much
shorter and poorly developed on other segments except on VI; segment VIII
with 10-14 comb scales, each scale pointed and with a short lateral fringe;
hair 1-VIII with 4 or 5 strong, stout branches; 2-VIII double or triple; 3- VII
with 4-6 strong, stout branches; 4-VIII double, slender; 5-VIII with 6-8 strong
branches; siphon large, slightly swollen at the middle, with 14 pecten teeth,
each tooth with 1-4 lateral denticles, the last tooth inserted at apical 1/2 to
1/3 of the siphon; siphonal tuft small, with 4 or 5 weak branches; saddle in-
complete, smooth; hair 1-X single; 2-X with 6-8 rather short branches; 3-X
Single; anal gills twice the length of the saddle; 3 or 4 precratal tufts present.
PUPA. As in figure 15. Description and figure based on cast skins of
paratypes. Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C single, short; 10-C with 3 branches;
11-C single; 12-C double. Abdomen. Hair 3-I with 3 or 4 long branches,
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
single on II-III and close to 2-I; 2-I-VII spine-like; 5-IV-VII double; 6-VII
branched; 9-VII fairly long or as long as 9-VIII, poorly developed on other seg-
ments. Paddles. With strong midrib and serrated outer margin; hair 1-P
Simple.
TYPE DATA. Holotype male, THAILAND: Songkhla, Nga Chang, SI-84-
11, 1965, terminalia on slide. Allotype female, same locality as holotype ex-
cept SI-82-12, terminalia on slide. Paratypes, 1 male, Nakhon Si Thammarat,
Ban Tha Phae; 2 females, same locality as holotype. Male holotype, female
allotype and 1 female paratype with associated skins on slides in the U. S. Na-
tional Museum (no. 69213). One male and 1 female paratypes with associated
skins on slides, in the British Museum (Natural History).
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
BIOLOGY. Adults have been bred from larvae collected in pools ina
stream bed.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) NOTABILIS, n. sp.
(Figure 18)
Although this species is based only on a single female specimen, the
terminalia are particularly distinctive in that the postatrial plate has 2 hairy
lobed structures. Also, the hind claws are equal, each claw toothed. Other
distinguishing features of the species are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark with a few pale scales at the sides and
occiput, some upright dark scales confined to the occiput; torus with a few
fine hairs on the inner side; palpus dark, about 1/6 the length of the proboscis;
proboscis dark brown, its length in proportion to the fore femur not deter-
mined because the fore legs are missing. Thorax. Scutal scales reddish
brown to golden brown along the anterior margin; pleural scales rather loosely
arranged; anterior pronotal lobe with 5 or 6 bristles, without scales; posterior
part of pronotum with 4 bristles; postspiracular area with 5 bristles; sterno-
pleuron with a few pale scales and fine hairs on the upper portion, several
fine hairs and 5 or 6 bristles below, the scales rubbed off; few upper mesepim-
eral scales mixed with fine hairs; lower mesepimeron bare; propleuron with
a few pale scales and 3 or 4 bristles; metameron bare. Wing. Alula fringed
with narrow scales. Legs. Fore legs missing, the remaining legs mainly
dark brown, the femora pale ventrally; mid and hind coxae each with a few
scattered pale scales; mid and hind claws equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen.
Terga dark, with white basal lateral patches; sterna mainly dark, with a few
scattered pale scales. Terminalia. As in figure 18. One large and 2 smaller
Spermathecae, each with a short neck; cercus short, the basal half broad;
postgenital plate rounded, deeply emarginate; postatrial sclerite convex,
weakly sclerotized; postatrial plate very characteristic, with 2 hairy lobed
structures basally; preatrial plate separated, small and hairy.
MALE, LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype female, THAILAND: Chon Buyi, Bang Lamung,
C1-1, 1963, terminalia on slide 30. iv. 66, no. 69214 in the U. S. National
Museum.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
BIOLOGY. Unknown.
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 29
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) PROTUBERANS, n. sp.
(Figure 19)
Based on only 2 male specimens, the female, larva and pupa not being
known. On external characters A. protuberans appears to be indistinguishable
from A. uncus or A. torosus, but protuberans is differentiated by the charac-
ters of the male terminalia. Other salient characters are as follows: anterior
portion of sternopleuron with fine hairs; lower part of mesepimeron with nu-
merous hairs; metameron bare. Hind tarsal claws equal, simple; fore and
mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia. As in figure 19.
Basimere with a long, pointed apical prolongation and 2 short processes, one
of which bears 3 or 4 sharp spines while the other simple and pointed; disti-
mere swollen near the middle, tapered distally; aedeagus large and well scle-
rotized, of the uwncus type; paraproct very short, stubby.
FEMALE, LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype male, THAILAND: Nakhon Si Thammarat,
Luang, T-1593e-1, 1962, terminalia on slide. Paratype, 1 male, same data
and locality as holotype except T-1593D. Male holotype and 1 paratype in the
U. S. National Museum (no. 69215).
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. Fitting the descriptions of A. uncus except
for the details of the male terminalia as noted above.
BIOLOGY. Unknown.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) PSEUDODIURNUS (Theobald)
(Figure 19)
Skusea pseudodiurna Theobald 1910, Rec. Indian Mus. 4: 32 (c).
Aedes (Aedes) pseudodiurnus (Theobald), Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res.
16: 371 (o*); Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 295 (c*).
The record of this species in Thailand is based on a single male speci-
men. The terminalia are particularly distinctive in having a short and un-
usually broad paraproct and a short, markedly swollen distimere with 4 or 5
projections, as in figure 19. The female, larva and pupa are not known.
Other distinguishing characteristics of the species are as follows:
MALE. Head. Vertex with the scales mostly rubbed off but the re-
maining ones brown, those on the occiput pale; torus with a few fine hairs;
palpus very short, about 1/8 the length of the proboscis; proboscis about as
long as fore femur, brown. Thorax. Scutal and scutellar scales reddish or
dark brown; anterior pronotal lobe with 5 bristles, without scales; posterior
part of pronotum with 4 bristles, without scales; postspiracular area with 1
bristle, without scales; sternopleural and mesSepimeral scales and bristles
mostly rubbed off, but a few hairs behind the upper mesepimeral scales;
lower part of mesepimeron bare; propleuron with bristles above and pale
scales below; metameron bare. Wing. Fringing scales on alula rubbed off.
Legs. Brown, the femora pale ventrally; hind claws equal, simple; fore
claws unequal, the larger claw toothed; mid claws missing. Abdomen. Most
scales rubbed off but with pale lateral markings according to Barraud (1934:
295). Terminalia. As in figure 19. Basimere rather simple, with only a
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
small subapical projection on the inner margin; distimere very characteristic,
short and markedly swollen distally, with 4 or 5 small projections and short
setae; aedeagus very simple; paraproct short, unusually broad.
FEMALE, LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Type male in the Indian Museum, Calcutta, India; type
locality: Sukna, Darjeeling District, base of E. Himalaya 500 ft. (West Bengal),
INDIA.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 1 male, Chon Buri, Khao Mai Kaeo.
Other distribution. INDIA.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. Although the specimen is in quite poor condi-
tion, the structures of the male terminalia fit very well the figures of Barraud.
BIOLOGY. The single male specimen was collected in a bait trap during
the daytime (kind of bait unknown).
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) TOROSUS, n. sp.
(Figure 19)
Based on only 2 male specimens, the female, larva and pupa not being
known. Very similar to A. uncus or A. protuberans in general habitus but
easily distinguished by the characters of the male terminalia, as in figure
19. Other salient characters are as follows: anterior portion of the sterno-
pleuron with fine hairs; lower mesepimeron with numerous hairs; metameron
bare; hind tarsal claws equal, simple; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger
claw toothed. Terminalia. Basimere with a long, slender prolongation, a
large hairy lobe and a large hooked spine at the inner mesal margin; disti-
mere Sinuous, tapered distally and with a small pointed process at the middle;
aedeagus large and well sclerotized, of the uncus type; paraproct very short
and stubby.
FEMALE, LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype male, THAILAND: Khon Kaen, Tham Pho Ti
Yan, T-1822e, 1962, terminalia on slide. Paratype, 1 male, same date and
locality as holotype except T-1822E. Male holotype and 1 paratype in the U.
S. National Museum (no. 69216).
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. Fitting the descriptions of A. uncus except
for the details of the male terminalia, as noted above.
BIOLOGY. Unknown.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) UNCUS (Theobald)
(Figures 16, 19)
Culex uncus Theobald 1901, Mon. Cul. 2: 53 (?*); Laffoon 1946, J. Wash.
Acad. Sci. 36: 237 (¢*o'*).
Aioretomyia varietas Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 185 (female only,
Synonymy by Knight and Hull 1953, Pacif. Sci. 7: 474).
A species having numerous fine hairs on the lower meSepimeron. The
female postatrial plate with a characteristically large cordate opening; male
sternum IX with a median pair of large spines along the distal margin and the
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 31
basimere with apical prolongations bearing 2 or 3 large spines. The pupa has
abdominal hair 2-I-VII spine-like, and 6-VII branched. The larva is not known
with certainty. Other distinguishing features of the species are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex blackish brown with patches of pale scales
laterally, a few scattered pale ones on the occiput and around the eye margin,
a few dark upright scales confined to the occiput; torus with a few fine hairs on
inner side; palpus very short, about 1/10 the length of the proboscis, blackish
brown; proboscis long and slender, longer than fore femur by 1 1/2 times the
length of the labella, dark brown. Thorax. Scutal scales brown, with some
golden scales on the front margin, prescutellar area and above the wing base;
sternopleuron with a large patch of white scales on the upper portion, a small
patch below mixed with some fine hairs, 8-10 bristles behind the scale patch
and many fine hairs on the anterior portion; lower mesepimeron with numerous
fine hairs which extend downwards to the suture; propleuron with pale and
brown scales and a row of bristles; metameron bare. Wing. Alula fringed
with narrow scales. Legs. Dark brown, the femora extensively pale ventral-
ly; hind claws simple, equal; fore and mid claws equal, each claw toothed;
fore coxal scale patch mostly brown, paler above; mid and hind coxae with a
few pale scales. Abdomen. Terga dark, with large pale lateral patches;
sterna dark at apices. Terminalia. As in figure 16. Three unequal sperma-
thecae, each with a short narrow neck; cercus elongate; postgenital plate
broad, with a shallow median emargination; postatrial sclerite convex medial-
ly; postatrial plate with a characteristically large, cordate opening and with
many long hairs basally; preatrial plate large, nearly completely divided.
MALE. General habitus essentially as in the female. Legs. Hind claws
simple and equal; mid and fore claws unequal, the larger claws toothed.
Terminalia. As in figure 19. Basimere with 2 long slender projections, one of
which bears 2 or 3 large spines at the tip while the other is split at the tip, also
with a short process armed with 6-8 strong spines and a shorter blunt projec-
tion; distimere elbowed at the middle, rather stout for most of its length; aedea-
gus much enlarged and well sclerotized; paraproct very short and stubby;
sternum IX with 2 pairs of large, sharp spines along the distal margin.
LARVA. Unknown, though I have seen a single cast skin in poor condi-
tion that cannot be associated with certainty.
PUPA. As in figure 16. Description and figure based on cast skins.
Cephalothorax. Hair 3-C double; 10-C with 6-8 branches; 11-C single; 12-C
with 5-6 branches. Abdomen. Hair 2-I-VII spine-like; 3-I with 5-7 branches,
long and single on II-III; 5-II-II with 6-8 branches, double on IV-VI; 6-VII
branched; 9-VIII single, fairly long, very small on other segments. Paddles.
Hair 1-P forked. i i
TYPE DATA. I have examined the female lectotype in the British Mu-
seum, selected by Knight and Hull 1953. Its terminalia are missing. Type
locality: Klang among the Plantains, Selangor, MALAYA.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 6 males, 24 females with 30 associated
pupal skins, Songkhla, Haad Yai; 2 females with associated pupal skins,
Trang, Muang; 2 females, Nakhon Ratchasima, Koraj Tha Klong; 2 females,
Khon Kaen, Tham Pho Ti Yan; 1 female, Nakhon Nayok, Sariga Village; 2
females, Chon Buri, Khao Mai Kaeo. Other distribution. I have also seen
specimens from JAVA, NORTH BORNEO, MALAYA, SARAWAK, ASSAM and
the PHILIPPINES.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The male terminalia show considerable
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
variation in the number of the spines at the tip of an apical prolongation of the
basimere (2 or 3 in most specimens) and in the development of the spines along
the margin of sternum IX. These spines are strongly developed in specimens
from Thailand and Malaya, poorly developed or absent in Some Specimens from
Palawan. Also, the shape of the female preatrial plate is quite variable. A.
uncus is remarkably similar to A. hirsutipleura and I can find no characters to
separate the two species except that in hirsutipleura the spines on sternum IX
are not as developed as in wncus, and there are 4 spines at the tip of the apical
prolongation. In this respect hirsutipleura resembles some specimens from
Palawan but differs by having the female preatrial plate almost divided in wncus,
entire in hirsutipleura. I do not feel that the above differences in the termi-
nalia are of significance, but more specimens of hirsutipleuva will have to be
examined. The differences are not quite clear and constant.
BIOLOGY. The larvae have been collected in various types of temporary
ground pools and in axils of the "elephant ear'' plant (Colocasia). Adults were
captured biting man in shaded areas in the jungle during the daytime.
AEDES (NEOMACLEAYA) VALLISTRIS Barraud
(Figure 17)
Aedes (Aedes) vallistris Barraud 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 16: 369 (o'*?*);
Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 290 (o*?*); Iyengar and
Menon 1956, Bull. ent. Res. 47: 791 (<).
A dark species with pale lateral patches on abdominal terga. It is easily
differentiated by the characteristic structures of the male and female terminalia,
as figured. The larva and pupa are not known with certainty. The distinguish-
ing features are as follows:
FEMALE. Head. Vertex dark or blackish with a narrow pale line around
the eye margin, small patches of pale scales laterally and on the occiput, a few
dark ones confined to the occiput; torus with fine hairs on the inner side; palpus
dark, about 1/6 the length of the proboscis; proboscis dark, longer than fore
femur by the length of the labella. Thorax. Scutal scales dark to reddish
brown, with some golden scales on the front margin and above to wing base;
anterior pronotal lobe with 2~4 pale broad scales and 8 bristles ; posterior
part of pronotum with some scattered narrow brown scales and a row of 5 or
6 bristles posteriorly; postspiracular area with 3-4 pale broad scales and 5-7
bristles; sternopleuron bare on the anterior portion, with large patches of pale
scales on the upper and lower portions, a row of 10-12 bristles behind the
upper scale patch; upper part of meSepimeron with a large patch of white
scales, the hairs behind this patch extending downwards to the middle of the
sclerite, the lower portion bare; propleuron mostly covered with pale scales;
metameron bare. Wing. Fringing scales on the alula rather narrow or lan-
ceolate. Legs. Dark brown, the femora pale ventrally; fore coxal scale
patch mostly brown with a small pale spot above; mid and hind coxae each with
a small patch of pale scales; hind claws equal, simple; fore and mid claws
equal, each claw toothed. Abdomen. Terga dark, with pale lateral patches
extending on to dorsum but not forming complete bands; sterna largely pale or
dirty white basally. Terminalia. As in figure 17. Two large spermathecae
and 1 smaller one, each with a short neck; cercus short and broad; postgenital
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 33
plate short and broad, with a shallow median emargination; postatrial sclerite
convex or rounded; postatrial plate with short lateral arms and numerous
long hairs along basal half of the opening; preatrial plate divided into 2 small
platelets which are provided with minute hairs.
MALE. Similar to female in general habitus. Legs. Hind claws sim-
ple, equal; fore and mid claws unequal, the larger claw toothed. Terminalia.
As in figure 17. Basimere with a short apical and 2 subapical projections and
a small lobe bearing a group of strong spines; distimere short, broad and
curved abruptly narrowing to a pointed tip, with 3-4 long setae at the curved
portion; aedeagus fairly simple; paraproct long and slender, evenly tapered
distally.
LARVA and PUPA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. A male is selected here as lectotype: terminalia in cellu-
loid mount on pin in the British Museum with the following data: ''Type/ASSAM,
GOLAGHAT/P. J. Barraud/Dec. 1924". Paratypes, 2 females, 1 male, term-
inalia in celluloid mount on pin, same locality as lectotype but the date 13. xi.
1925.
DISTRIBUTION. THAILAND: 2 males, 12 females, Chiang Maz; 2 fe-
males, Nakhon Si Thammarat; 1 female, Udorn (Udon Thani), Nong Bau; 1 fe-
male, Ubol (Ubon Ratchathani), Chang Puex; 1 female, Nakhon Ratchasima,
Koraj Tha Klong; 2 females, 1 male, Nakhon Nayok. Other distribution. I
have also seen specimens from ASSAM and BURMA.
BIOLOGY. The adults have been collected in bait traps, and the larvae
in jungle pools.
ACKNOW LEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to Dr. Alan Stone, Agricultural Research Service, U. S.
Department of Agriculture and Dr. Botha de Meillon, South East Asia Mosqui-
to Project, Smithsonian Institution, for their many helpful suggestions and
criticisms concerning this work; and to Dr. Peter F. Mattingly, British Mu-
seum (Natural History), London, for much help extended during my visit to
his institution. The illustrations were drawn by Miss Elaine R. Taylor, Miss
Thelma L. Ford and Miss Jung Lea Hwang. The typing of the manuscript for
offset reproduction was by Miss Calesta C. Lipscomb, all of the South East
Asia Mosquito Project. I am especially appreciative of their assistance.
REFERENCES CITED
Barraud, P. J.
1928. A revision of the culicine mosquitoes of India. Part XXIV. The
Indian species of the subgenera Skusea and Aedes with descriptions
of eight new species, and remarks on a new method for identifying
the females of the subgenus Aedes. Indian J. med. Res. 16: 357-
375, illus.
Abbreviations according to the World List of Scientific Periodicals, 3rd Edi-
tion, Academic Press, 1952.
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
1931. Descriptions of eight new species of Indian culicine mosquitoes.
Indian J. med. Res. 19: 609-616, illus.
1934. Family Culicidae. Tribes Megarhinini and Culicini. The Fauna
of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera, Vol. 5, 463
pp., illus. London.
Belkin, J. N.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). 2 vols.
608 and 412 pp., illus. Univ.California Press.
Bohart, R. M.
1945. A synopsis of the Philippine mosquitoes. U. S. Navmed 580, 88
pp., illus. Washington.
Brug, S. L.
1931. New Culicidae from Sumatra. Tijdschr. Ent. 74: 245-250, illus.
Brunetti, E.
1914. Critical review of "genera" in Culicidae. Rec. Indian Mus. 10:
15-73.
Causey, O. R.
1937. Some anopheline and culicine mosquitoes of Siam with remarks on
malaria control in Bangkok. Amer. J. Hyg. 25: 400-420.
Dyar, H. G. and R. C. Shannon
1925. The types of Philippine mosquitoes described by Ludlow and
other notes on the fauna (Diptera, Culicidae). Insec. Inscit. menst.
13: 66-89.
Edwards, F. W.
1917. Notes on Culicidae, with descriptions of new species. Bull. ent.
Res. 7: 201-229, illus.
1922a. A synopsis of adult Oriental Culicine (including Megarhinine
and Sabethine) mosquitoes. Part I. Indian J. med. Res. 10: 249-
293.
1922b. A synopsis of adult Oriental Culicine (including Megarhinine
and Sabethine) mosquitoes. PartII. Indian J. med. Res. 10: 430-
475.
1928. Mosquito notes. -VII. Bull. ent. Res. 18: 267-284, illus.
1932. Genera Insectorum. Diptera, Family Culicidae. Fascicle 194,
258 pp., illus. Belgium.
Edwards, F. W. and D. H. C. Given
1928. The early stages of some Singapore mosquitoes. Bull. ent. Res.
18: 337-357.
Iyengar, M. O. T. and M. A. U. Menon
1956. The mosquitoes of South Thailand. Bull. ent. Res. 47: 785-794,
illus. :
King, W. V. and H. Hoogstraal
1947. New Guinea species of mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, subgenus
Aedes. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 37: 113-134, illus. ~
Knight, K. L. andW. B. Hull
1953. The Aedes mosquitoes of the Philippine Islands III. Subgenera ~
Aedimorphus, Banksinella, Aedes, and Cancraedes (Diptera, Culi-
eldae). | hac,..9cl. (1400-400. lus.in. gtk oo
Laffoon, J.
1946. The Philippine mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, subgenus Aedes.
J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36: 228-245, illus. ~ oie fiat
Delfinado: Aedes (Neomacleaya) of Thailand 35
Leicester, G. F.
1908. The Culicidae of Malaya. Stud. Inst. med. Res. F.M.S. 3: 18-
261.
Stone, A., K. L. Knight and H. Starcke
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culi-
cidae). The Thomas Say Foundation, ent. Soc. Amer. Vol. 6, 358
pp.
Theobald, F. V.
1901. A monograph of the Culicidae of the World. Vol. 2, 391 pp.,
illus.
1907. A monograph of the Culicidae of the World. Vol. 4, 639 pp.,
illus. London.
1910. Second report on the collection of Culicidae in the Indian Museum,
Calcutta, with descriptions of new genera and species. Rec. Indian
Mus. 4: 1-33, illus.
th fe TAL
|
Nat
'
Ai fat '
pilpory
inayat
oe
z2
x
=
eis
ANDAMANENSI/S
IX tergum
ee,
\ ANDAMANENS/S
Vill
O~o
"SZ
JL. HWANG
—
ern)
postgenital
plate
postatrial
sclerite
postatrial
plate
preatrial
sclerite
preatrial
plate
ATRIUS
cercus
SSS
Sara
\Y \
yi \
ON
STR
Ey, Th ia ‘e SGN ‘
ae eN
= RANT Avis
~~ S Y,
®
is
®
£
2
oO
ATRIUS
1.Omm
—J. L. HWANG
CRETATUS
ro)
i
®
=
=
we
Oo
oct
parapr
f
Se
CRETATUS
0.2mm
CYRTOLAB/S
distimere
0O.Imm
paraproct
IX tergum
DERMAJOENSIS = Ye oe
postatrial
plate
preatrial
plate
0.1mm
J. 1. HWANG
distimere
paraproct
G/BBOSUS
MP
1.Omm
/ postatrial
plate
; i,
preatrial eee
plate
INCERTUS
Fig. 13
INDECORABIL/S
So
coabes ae. 7
3 ya
i if
e- conus %
. oy,
if ‘,
‘ eee ee
S
As
5, 4
INCERTUS
aedeagus
0.2mm
\& postatrial
sclerite
postatrial
plate
preatrial
plate
LATIPENNIS
Fig.15
distimere
Sa
et
ia ; eR, coe °
ergum ae
LATIPENN/S
“ preatrial
plate
Fig. 17
US) distimere
a he 0.1mm
fe 2
LQCiRy
Sit
Ok
paraproct
VALLISTRIS
disti mire Vi
paraproct
CLAVATUS
INDICUS
AISPIDUS
HWANG
0.1mm
NOTABILIS
SAY
SN
SES! SN
Fig. 19
distimere
=~ paraproct
PROTUBERANS PSEUDOD/IURNUS
i) 0.2mm
weed
distimere
Ni
distimere
TOROSUS UNCUS
Fig. 20
CAUTUS
(from Barraud, 1928)
G/BBOSUS
INDICUS
(from Barraud, 1934)
elaine r. taylor
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 1, no. 8, 1967
INDEX TO NEOMACLEAYA OF THAILAND
Acknowledgements 33
AEDES Meigen 2
adustus Laffoon 1,9,10,11
Aioretomyia Leicester 2,22, 30
andamanensis Edwards 7s, 9.10;
7,8,9, 10, 12
atrius Barraud 425.651, 8:17 12
campylostylus Laffoon 250
cautus Barraud 4,5,6, 8,12
clavatus Barraud 4,5,6, 8,13
cretatus, n. Sp. 4,6,7,8,14
Culex Linnaeus 30
cyrtolabis Edwards 2,3,4,5, 6, 7,
8,16
dermajoensis Brug 4,5,6,7,8,17
dux Dyar & Shannon 4,0; (, 0, LG,
19, 20
gibbosus, n. Sp. 4,5,6, 7, 8, 20
hirsutipleura Barraud 32
hispidus, n. sp. 4,7,8,21
imitator Leicester 25, 26
incertus Edwards 4,5, 7, 8, 22, 24
indecorabilis Leicester 20
indecorabilis (Leicester) 4,5, 7,
8,25, 26
indica Theobald 2,24, 25
indica var. simplex Theobald 9
indicus (Theobald)
Introduction 1
johnsoni Laffoon 10
latipennis, n. sp. 4,5, 6,8, 26
macrodixoa King & Hoogstraal 3,18
margarsen Dyar & Shannon 10
mediofasciata Theobald 24,25
NEOMACLEAYA Theobald 2,3
neomacrodixoa King & Hoogstraal 3
nigrotarsis (Ludlow) 24,25
notabilis, n. sp. 4,7, 8,28
panayensis Ludlow 3
protuberans, n. sp. 4,6,8,29
pseudodiurna Theobald 29
pseudodiurnus (Theobald) 4,5, 6, 8,29
References Cited 33
sigmoides Barraud 18,20
singularis (Leicester) 21
Skusea Theobald 24,25,29
taeniata Leicester 22,200
torosus, n. sp. 4,5, 6,8, 30
uncus Theobald 30
uncus (Theobald) 4,5, 6, 8, 30, 32
vallistris Barraud 4,5, 6, 8, 32
varietas Leicester 2,30
VERRALLINA Theobald 1,2, 24,25
yusafi Barraud 2
4,7,8, 22,24, 25
Sates
sie ry
de Zz AYY ey ~ if 2 we ame EZ. eF ~~ YY * NES = Hy ‘a sab ye edhe ;
. 5 me see eC GS ee
ie n ny 77) :
i1VYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _ NOILNLILSNI S3Al1uve
“ ao. one oc a oc | (
=“ a % 4 ar , |
c oe 5 a e oe
= "OG: aad (i ro) & Oo . z
TUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITU
See -_ S ‘a aS <= 2a
2 a E . ra G: 2 Ké
pe > pe —~ an bs Uf; oa
og teas ~ sa ae . % “4 “
” ri LQY “” m n’ i ae
SS wn a a w | < a7,
LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILONLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS
= * ” _ 7) Zz ”
< = s */ = < Ss
z 4 : ar ~
fs = 5 =r 2 & =
ae: ae) ae 3S i O
— = be z — 2
> 2 = = >” = =
7 : a | 77) Zz 7) z
NOILNLILSNI__ NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN
“ee - 3 «Ss
ca oe w = o thy, ~\
Qe mel a m ‘ Yc, ome
ow pe ac = ox -
od = wd ae 2 _ 7 >
iyvu¥git LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS
: = z rm z = : z
a Oo ‘. re) 8 oh ome
om mom to oun
U b= f % . b> 0 | feo 8) 5 fame
~ “fF . a + gia : pe
te - GY 859 E oe -
n EY 2 5 : ;
ITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3SINYVYUGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN
rom (79) z ‘ €p) < ate * 72) z.
a = < = ot NS = <
= z = aN =
x oO =. OD We &. a O §
zZ E 2 Ew} = -
; > = > = 2 =
bes i Ne ae 7) = 72) See ”
JVUYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS
> : YW) : a “”) 2 : a ee wn
ot = 4 os 7 : van
ae ow. pe. a . o
, 4 3
4 c o c Lae
O sig oO AS ie = oO i :
NOILNLILSNI S3Iyvygii SMITHSONIAN INSTITU
z - r iS on ta |
© pana us 7 ip
= 7 : 7% = Ge. Wy,
: = 3 : eA“
a sien ae sd i eS fe
wn rm WS w pes uw) * :
= | 7) = w <
LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI
= * ee a 2) z
< S < = <
= — z ~f Me
ee a Bb AB
x AWRY O x aes Mis
= a eS = > _=
v”) ya 7) z 75)
NOILALILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES
ox oF oe ‘a raved
= c a: of ne
40 « Y a eo ee ae Yo (FSA U2 ee
ser ow Um UC SUS ee
7) on si 77) | oe ee
PAR | ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI_ poatuwug ld LIBRAL
us oe tad = Mf -
~ . i a =o oc bss.
< rm < — < mi
Cc c Cc
cee 4 - 4 o 4
= S) 3 | a Oo
—! = J ! im Se ee
S3IYVYUGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLI
[ es Co = _ a rs
wo os ow ‘a 4: oo =
= a 2 > jy; 2
> bh > ‘a Up fl f. > ee
= _ ae 4 fer ® :
D z - oo: o Z
ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS LIBRAF
” nS on z 7) Fie
= = = yh, = <Gim = eee
onl . oun Vig fy, ste <.
a : Zh ffl.” i
= = 2.0 fe & 2 E
SS > = ye = >" =
sf = v) Zz 7) z ”)
VLLLSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS _LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN _ 2
a om rr > Y yp, & MW
of Oc = ow CA * i. oc
c } es a <C a 2 ou
Re SR «
5 a "3 :
| 4 Z se 2 ee |
ARIES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION | -NVINOSHLINS S31uVu at LIBRAR
- = k= poe. a. 2
a a > — >: —_ >
ae = i 2 - :
LLILSNI SJIUVUEIT LIBRARIES INSTITUTION. NOILNLI
z w A we ” Zz Ae, )
<< = i= QA Se oe A Ss
Vaz = aN aS ee
7 ” YW). **, Y) : <a 5 op) ” x T) ;
“yp B O % os \ ~O pi O
Lp is Z = , 2 E 2
ARIES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS $3 IYVUGIT LIBRA
7 om z ~ yes a
Ph c oc ee a ar
a : o it O - O
a A = ne =a oe -
ILILSNI_NVINOSHLINS /S31YVYdIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION _, NOILALI.
mh O —~ = O 4 > ~ 6
eee pol ow eee
a 2 os sy 2 2
a E _ a 2 e
m . z m 2 a z
ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOLLALILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS, Saluvag!7 LIBRAR
= z Tm = gi +=
— z a ON
- S z 5 Ny
» oO a O ae AY s
z = Zy ae RANK \
IN > es > = PSs
LILSNI_NVINOSHLINS $3 | INSTITUTION NOILNLU
ra o a 30 NO ae |
| pe! a KETO) =
oe Oo Means ee 2 ox
| | ee <<
- P ow a Ah