re Rahs de : ’ ele ee ESF hye LOE SLT TS ee 8 he tat gepe pete he here sere Te 7H re
erepetararehe is letetel otel sree er iepets Taakaa sks rebeis elereierst Sietetret ett lel ete el ikielelererstelrierererers Leo fete hel oh ere St ere!
ehahdhtrgin gabe planers tren cietereisteisiete hada annihdeokad PONT) 7) Th bdbaade soaks hes see hte ee Se Paashcadesadaseh rete kejeleiats
13 Fi agar ere Asdaks hahah ee jel bei } ( hatazahsestet
« 5 Sika be Has ee oper preistei ee, ike esa be Hbejsieleiere! Saas ae stahsuahee sheeshsts
of pepercreiets
PEELS SST SS She ee he ee ietateleheterateiaros@ieletahe feds
Perse bss be Leal vk st tid bso te age haar ghia ‘te 1k DL UL ORR ak fk doa ee bow eens.
Sorat erereleisceieleisi ey: Pintiahshapsestendeeteneeeastetsapepaeatapests ase: bebeserei cts ; Liepere erat sree eier rer rts tere srerens
: ; pibigurss bars oak Taldtoreetersistrieretetstersireern) pheletereis breiate!
he Lisittss Lb erie rtrnrepeietepetadetetstersiers a Tere ber
R , Paks ts . i abs ie a Na i : “
; d \ he ew Ahdhahcha bdied. nee
ey sists rile feicerieheisy 4 41 ates
beg paki hd Bees Aral deeded tre &: i Bet Me kte 2 ita hb gas sasha ks haa ad neh dese dyin xed bebe heaped aeess x : : te
iepeletrts dadbs ba pei eietniere te! igs Fede 8 lak dy ayo Reet rereleretarersperers +e pecetehetaratel oie ets eieteteieisieieiede iran a aed ros ed :) ere P LR Rsk ‘ Te roi alerete edb chek ah seek eg aes rhs 5S 575
Takase. Ahih shania dubebuncye scibeacesnceeeete ls Teak ib. qaha ere rere dyihahdndeahsbs singh atanay shukeho dey Ud Seetefereistere . benfep et ranbie riyelesederoperstererereterel payateterer es jajerererelerrictsiory 2eeeass | 7 32% :
| asbeteniiasanabssagnoststatati dggua esesaapty nena anagg rats teas tan tatneate dado chat 0 sntesesesheesteaggeestatetatatene cat gtngeesaes toes hh reigtripisirersrapiisrottwerieterensisietereteisesereeteteisiecettertwerscertrstersiiei st terth
4 4 5 ; d A Bete et é bs : | - F eR RS, ; 2 ‘Febehes eRe . » 7 yi a Ea i 2 al 4 ; . .
; jelerelens pebet nteyel et: Teiererereteisis eeprerererepprererersieltiolerritin nr tertters tet Pabweckt ht bane BET STS Ee et yereneterereret poteiare ts Fama zane eect oe ede
mi : ; : ; ape? pebere eevtct~(eferele ore Tr eqeiersperererer® eh eel papererere rer res
P 4 Se reapers! abate Heber, hdepbicd dian
ppepererererety
re tal irdles be ; Sg
to falerwinpeiel t Robs be eeeee HSB AR RD
hdhchdnahahthannaahahs sa hahaa dt Be ests PArdedanaae tyes shih ses Tubararerereretet® . : .
ateipiorer st poleteterricestets Era So rere eer eT er eres ere ey ele ee pp eroreerey eh 2 ppareyeper ers re ee re
i OPES Ee ee careteds BARA ORE ay raha pre er
ht epeleiessreneisepleepegstretetererer emetetsieteerspestr eters
ba ee ead oe as erer :
si : = aALSQakaka enh ae
. ererererereyet®: piejstepere bel)
Yaubpulpe dad le ai dee es . dbaks! i
ee See ee LEB Se RR ee ak Rete chilnteph eit +o as 2 A ts , . at
eRe Rit Shere P rs oreterepotepetett pibdbdbdhahsgedihabsnabahaeahaay oy 52 he 5 parte herels rehe tithe sith ff
z 7 q &» = Lat >. Pe = : Hh ie di +t beat ; : .
Y : 5 f Te nba tal elated ‘tots Tubelaret arenes Ser SpeeeP eT ST eRe TES hS Te lerererene? '
: rat pigieioieieieinies otebstvisisiseririviereterery! cape! x ereiet rletrictersrersrereretstel pererereges teak
‘ i bie tht ad RIES PRESSE STOTT pene Pinte and boy tRAReheye Sees Fey alas hah th ate ds
tattadhtide eget asia rape lehe) *) Lisierereiere pophes She he hs te tes ta thts 2h Thal
: | t priatt it felerereiierelererisiereiensiterartrs heel poreteristelet iirerereperererers ieiererererer (ead as
‘ oy bert _ be a ® ? abel 2 ‘ oo i
Serer ersrepsiereters whapaksdad aan heath aeahaeat Sppeanse ATE TRPS Tse pikshahdassdkgathabahs aches iorareteteteietes oi 2h ise: at na
qs preperererererer (siete iieielere creas rare le) rapareteleteteleiere rere Lyerarerere efor ere prehe
Aka ea Spepeiererarebere(et ere) eee ee hrererenere qin dhe ahah elt Pan caskuhsvehahdnaes wake be rel itt hak rertiacererersherets
vm i pete he (ere tet eee ee rerpiererererereraren Rie eLE NS Lrererercre re rerere re Nel e terererererseiere! fepeter rejorererers >
: Se erererajelayereyey nr ao bettedeae rere! ee rer i riietererererereterereie' be iorerer: ee erat arers Higars® pererepers eels ' nef irereserererere! releperetelererst
; SE er Liarerererere pty haired De ee at ee jereiepersrererehs yer it hh seasaesad : - errs dies ing 4 attra hatinn SARS rater reterersse: lerorereret
ofa) a 7 Re) e) athe orerereret Pe ak vers a Re chante: : . irdyereret rors 2
ates ‘ aietale ®) <h hahaa hs Feet rerrpereieren rereye ; habe
, te thet ace a felines efelepetereret :
PELE SHEET E SEN Tee icrereleraher eparih ist fehers sapere tere beta ate e ; :
ba <5 rarely imieieietersreieiaies aaa abikibane hetgivisieieiststrieirerstorets faleteisicteivteretsisrctei ties ant hn pistetwtyis pagdhabahs saddest pthd bah dadd cheba band ans Asa k eer a el i
| sieieisitisiciejeleieicisieielsigieisie cieectansyeperegureteleberatetetetste iis trictes teereerrcre nen tqetersrefetrecirieicisterrietr tip ores nescrireqerene ere iieretrtet testes terete sahahes f
: srs ; eae rey repepoteys repaperepersperere hy SS! ere -
tive) pers re & ets tolsieiererster Fetnisieisteterererete iets Seieisteister ahaha
Sibgit dae dhs hehe ke batabed aa 7 ‘ rt dese Sy : ‘
dds abceik ah dist bak ake Lidheh =! Ne Te ieleerereielels Dre anel eretabehatenrel et ore! es fore te: ey i
iwiefe(eraesierajerel eters) sisscrelsivteteimeteineterrtiwritrets: et Pores isistoysreieierebelrel sont Lyd eab dt bid ard be baie is ir
: ereheforerey bibs heme asada art etheh dba o Ay Ne eee rararereieiers at Telotereretsl ‘
hes : Raed ae as hel ie Deir bre bt od BA be are ; dah eh dies pers peteier ote ,
‘ et
dled bor ened gl le he hs paar asthe aks SE Te ee ee ret ereperers
fete : pele hetel arn es ey rottasnereityerareeproapieseiereipepieitrst hak
a
dhe rt ba pdt has ribdkd teas m Pet ake :
dedba hahha raw Ghthaeenss bibtgs bh beh tity th thee = ahaaee hth has kak ah eae Aaa ES ERS ; yerererer:
papasptatcshtasbatsastan act han sangeasen ite Sote spinon tata ase uesetauiy tea tpaa eisleivisiolorel : : ee eisimtebere! eek pre herel sietereiererseereretsts pieterererels ¢
Heisivivloisioletssciei ri tircpereisteiereterstereerreretster ibrolrioietetelereiefelspeieratereierets . See rorsrensteis? pieket jeyebeberers! rs
yal be icled beled esd belive Pat ches besarte be See Lieieteleierereters mboter pig (etebeyeis feats eleie per prefereperejerererererererereretets dh yah weet D Seed ¢ =
oveleieleltiris ietetersholorsrsrerers re feneeere che hihabakshohepaks fakdis. atts pibdbatyahehs ; . Shee Teabitaritabbskdhayans 4 rh rere , retsreiere : olels
sisietes ieivie jotepebelel sie eiel ei iiieisictelsteteretstererel ets ts ! Se THpeTererys eretel piejejelerere rere eiereieisieters: Tererereterorelel ere lei eee et elereleters
rinieisigivicielersioterersssiseetsentetnlstneateaterep pefeteemeiereleteltiststtenetr tnusciereiete ih Feieierereieieisiviste(eieperersieisitisl ttl rits jerefererelebetsielebeterers! ieisiefesets Teste Hotstelereleistrirapereiersieiersttisty
anihaba betes te rei tsiareiotersielerererereierelerereleleie! se leter ee ret ropsierererereierererels thakata sbakahsha tae Tefareletererer sbeteterel piviqatetetsicterstereretorereterereres rents : !
7 viel: wivieieter aachsabebesesttatetaanihreahanae nant age Nidisieisietererercreterelelsicrerers tr cll lh Feteleten jerererensiegererels’ ejereiersivietersreperetcrsnrsl yy reise
B pepereiaieis in sn eqerererersrerer ers bie REPOS here er Reha hak si Peeler ere ste er Leakaasrshchahahes
. x preccrereterere le ratefeyeteh Aisi peisieierare tind epee Tererereperei vis fois ei
" pele ntsc ea de pag dd bales lip Se wieh hanes brs det ‘
ps ben ¢ / devia bya & dare hae d ten kaadid gd ate hata
= eleispesreitPeisiettets fet < voreret ey preret
Tepeher es
BPte Tp Th ckadsheke tebe hetadites ri kah dt robamdaakeeaav hanes
Fl
bal
dat hat aes kadeeai > heb dhabebasy asad eet eeeet Se chdea gee bi Pee eh ost frie ap pe babs be Se 4 : t oi
A rs i 5 Serer ditch ahd Tee eee Haw bs ba edie he . pees De al k
-: ‘ ; dyad Alea ah PAP PRAD ‘Ds i: 7: Lat
ba babe shekihshakat?e
he pepe Ss Tes Rai ho bs ee
fw ciwiejoi~leielayerayelerers ie) s) pelea perers) je fe pafiet
a = ie De ak ris : Th th habs beret wha hans Papriet brisrepereseiereretetsieisreiety rr eee arerets ererercrelepeletelers bab dead dh ee canes : h
(ele tepeleis(eiereiere ere rere ee eee tiehey Keck ircly ad be ie itepelcreierefelerereyen Face h lrthsine batts hehe fed been harden bea toa ed irs elereieieieietereisTsty ‘
i Dini dbat shebah ade ah eheke POTS OESES OTS PNT SIC at tL te rate bakw : tbally thd bw here Tere ;
' bash Tee Te aerated th by be le ke
Shab baka b Chek h ss nhohe 7s
thihdeohi bie chaht estab bh eh Jy Bb at br tt al at ow bot & eh 4 ‘
Dae hd bd nchas erereferepajere(serel pererereiseet stele yee a raersper Sieielererersiesolerer er = )
1 d ret | oe : 3 J ed elt eet hee AR : x 4 * . pieiet
Sibshehs Sd tener eeabshsbehsedy sh
shaee hes rigihizdire ed
ints
af Lae 4 $y Bee
apaeag act tereapaeneaa toa
s :
She) es Ton Tisha erarerereretererereiet tend ' Pegs tas bys D |
pehthababebthded ys rubieene baneks at habshsb ate bia dhabdba hah ees icbek dhs Sdat hae ake recerets el . aks orsisieds
PROSE See eT erarererere erereren heeese PRS S TST Oe ee Lreret [wiaieteiwjaiepeteieie rere! er es
adGdhotdeebuhthabve she babrber than tha tha hs eS se Sop viwie pei f RA Ee eee eTereteiereretereteteterets : abd
Foleiviepeisivisiwinpaererejeierere teres eer reiele ys sabes Re rdededbaeshansgatththd rahi babes her ae desks eae Dibaathakd eet ae erase
- Laat i by dul a irsind Reade tes Foreierelereie ie tel elebereierete! nape ae dat
STererererersiorey
sar teigrersietti
‘ PC reherarepete
* ’
efarernn whet byt
Ae ded bbedhc bak tetha bat pce baled keine ie 5m ) Sekt ababab ahah ibaa sides sea eee then ake
szivisiefoieisielels jerepepere) Tak detail ead bars bulbaied brs k dlek hake bert ke hae sila es a be ae a eats é sie ps bes nieiele
tet ire baie be Lathe gst sh the pa bah rebut aes: rT nnetuneiuret. hiv joieiel kabtbe gththib thee td sedge sckehthad dhe
: etal to ils . ~ ei Teretirerereretsrstererereret Tilerurereisiersrers Leaks kan ta
bpks has sh dhe soe Vp aby ed ah he hte he det led pst Sy " ae BE oieretelerelerefetereierererevers feimivee! Ss} ers
hse ded en Ped brs Beet dlr aides a Se Te ee ee ee pie tae ererKereret faleislereisielnivle ore! Pore rel Sree" Sok chet PR ~ "
we i 4 i abcbdb sedate tib the bdbat kde brdbal ved bak abe =?) rie er crererersierereieiers : et picteretet
¢ rd sie sie ah I eS Ny de elie ee ed ae dn ea
P Sirlicisieiersrererererrrerererereis! eleres
.
.
ee orerers
ee eee ranieleterstereis eran ce teholahsnareieterers! whale where? .
Ldbdhdhtbabuh sid ka retaken Aku eAee Ssh ere Waleicisielsiviersiwiets feeble sietwleretets Serer Abthchabastnah pibaks
Andhaeekabaneei ede aii ht hekert ahs ho hak piksgibded gibi nekindbade eats eb ddryt ira beol bete fejwlereie(eiuleiels : tre :
bag she peinisieistsisrelsiereleiei sire tr raratereter ele nhs: ejeierer eters Sikh aris ad en ral bd bye abihce She yee tes
at bhi Ribth dash abd br hahah thdiahateeshaeleabahdlbs has takes Pere crane peters thdes dimes be AE Spee ere : “ dope ka beth p : *e — - 4 3 rahe s! tke ee
risieielsssteislyieieieinlsleleiwiereiell 2 Ole ro peieier ete sisters! stieal tr tice tem Ay baipthv bi barsne hal - utete a. ae by aaak- se aha. . if rahe e wha be rity at ¢ a s Fakaye bs
sto ruTaiereretet ereisivferrisretereis! sitivity liccierersiersierereys Ri bsbi nd pl adipthiheaehihaherhehes : ; Pureke be shed or < ; Ne bac Tsien are te apn Seal Ses , rahe ab +e ete paw! Seperereret’
peyeeteiyite reresepererrgeisreistersisinivierei eager eter raiiperereyereistegerersiereteteterelrisirrers writ tare ; ciaez eietrrererersteleitiereleiy phirtrers forejereieretets trey lierse ; prerevoieinirieis
ab eae Behe babi gs ae ahs he bs hehe ee see he Fit tes mew bel Bak « + a ates F . i ae +e 1S + iP a4 ie bee S rors {
Sfoisisie ts. Sedhtheh tee Seitisierrtp ionstursiersiereieieiviriscetietpipeet piper orspetepepetera ee eeier “ eristrererepierrsren per
STebed pakchthehard pibsacks pater dee keh ane btidhthiadaevkochs beet eee rete hereherehatarerareTers Y: r ‘ dhakihehak dts ke teeth hades
a dbo bibl ht rs as sivisiSiepegeler visi wiertiei vies eel ry, Lidbobasotabi heres bthah eb shal ba kd! lea et Aw thease prabthd hahaha kas: c ray < tee dant i 7 ‘ Fee arerererereret
eerie reroratstelerereieierereie@lereler™ idles Ja ’ ed hske lh sheshyeys ; ai . vee ‘ bi bakaka ew pelerels ; peretet rer rer
eth ‘ : nis) : d hake / re es : : of: S13 tet POF < os :
er eratereerereaerarerers ape ae heEs: as : rapejey we! dial pct feat epee? pereyeretere St habe kd bare poegeretel es
ye
din bp byt bakehchtba sethebdhdhdhs hsbebahss ‘ revel - > : .
ri peieie | ehike. feieiwieresesetieisisteleisivierereters i ei erereriaer phan d
tea Sirs bt Scithdeshss tha’ 4
base
eae eieterel Sere ahha ‘ > rR,
abn btledie dhohahabtrdedbindiseah Shdathe Se Sibi baba eeh At ahee dae the haty dh th ae :
dup ha bat ahdivss eperers Sipe bah ee ed be olen PEEP ETS ee ee eo eraperererel fe hn aba La es
ereretererie perstereieiwiciweric(ri Piri ritiscedicpijetere: jajerviererererereres! : tite:
igunshatsbasstsethabeaseeepesheesuage guests recs tacet setghe gagnea ome te seaets sale teaesbeneaabae
iecheatt ; om 4 = - a Bt aye ey La a Sa hh doyat MN ere ees
rreLaisiseptstpeteeRererepeeapeisisrerstoetel Euebigeas te tashdestuacazateieseta gaat eye
fae Hetsieien brdkchdtdedes gahs de Bo pers rer Ark eat kag dh da tak soe rere yepels maakt aed eye Shake
ahake . eleielielelsieieie!s: iedhde shee eee se thans. windh stad bdnamdbcbs kaha has ores me Re htt Sept Dhak de ‘
bak tvahehsma ee direes be bess Lied bthcha sed hdiy ti ein hil bak, F parey Lkibshckits® ded
rerereleteieis oreteieie siriereteret gi dhal tare pt hahed eae sib
lejelwivieleisiepelejete - eivjerelerefers ls ahhh i; g rx » oh
oars one taeegaeogae tas tieh a gh eash
pabthanpribsrihdbsee mthahsbehcaghabi ae bsha sedans)
Retaatahdec tas sanbatsteagaa haba teaane ini
, ihe. tale t i
es he
Ate
Leal eh sk naar
halyard Ter i ne ath
fepeterererelstorerererelerereieiels
ai pee She Pie lere le eee Spree eer eres
3 x Ravin tcaes
aor sei fore epee tes prorerer
cbeteh trccierere
Wigieterer
aake re pokehal
elie des - : :
steeetteet
nraaats
baa rereie .
he
4 thal
supeleierer®]
vivre leiererercieiepy
is viet Fefeletslere eft F
pve a 5 =f o = y . 7 b
pevebetelers vere rerereter erareterer
fetel:
wei
rere
their?
rie
FT
ae
ise
i
+hace Ne
; )
Bay ae
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
\! S
Volume 8, 1972
CONTENTS
No.1. Gangwere, S. K., M. Morales Martin, and E. Morales
Agacino. The distribution of the Orthopteroidea in Teneriffe,
Canary Islands, Spain. May 5, 1972. 40 pages.
No.2. Arnell, J. Hal and Lewis T. Nielsen. Mosquito studies
(Diptera, Culicidae) XXVII. The varipalpus group of Aedes
(Ochlerotatus). May 9, 1972. 48 pages.
No.3. Zavortink, Thomas J. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae)
XXVIII. The New World species formerly placed in Aedes
(Finlaya). June 30, 1972. 20 6 pages.
No.4. Kistner, David H. A revision of the termitophilus tribe
Feldini (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) with a numerical analysis of
the relationships of the species and genera. August 1, 1972.
pages 1-35.
Baker, John N. and David H. Kistner. The reorganization
of the Dorylaerus Complex by the use of numerical analysis
with some new distribution records and new data on their be-
havior. August 1, 1972. pages 36-52.
No.5. Haas, Glenn E., Nixon Wilson, and P. Quentin Tomich.
Ectoparasites of the Hawaiian Islands. I. Siphonaptera.
September 7, 1972. 76 pages.
No. 6. Sirivanakarn, Sunthorn. Contributions to the mosquito fauna
of southeast Asia XIII. The genus Culex, subgenus Eumelano-
myia Theobald in southeast Asia and adjacent areas. October 27,
197 2. 86 pages.
This is an irregular-appearing series,
published by the
AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
9950 Warren Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA
Volumes 1-7 available in individual numbers
Volumes 8 and following supplied only as
complete cloth-bound volumes
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 8, Number 1, 1972
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ORTHOPTEROIDEA IN
TENERIFE, CANARY ISLANDS, SPAIN
By
S. K. Gangwere, M. Morales Martin,
and E. Morales Agacino
oe ps -
ae aes ng eye
> TT
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ORTHOPTEROIDEA IN
TENERIFE, CANARY ISLANDS, SPAIN?
By
S. K. Gangwere, M. Morales Martin, and E. Morales Agacino”
During the summer of 1970 one of the authors, S. K. Gangwere, carried
out an investigation of feeding in the Orthopteroidea of Tenerife, Canary Is-
lands, Spain, and thereby obtained some knowledge of that island and of the dis-
tribution of certain of its species. Then during his return to the United States
he visited the Instituto Espanol de Entomologia, Madrid, a museum with the
world's largest collection of Canarian Orthopteroidea. These activities yielded
considerable data, and placed him in contact withthe second author, M. Morales
Martin, who for years has been researching the Canarian orthopteroids, has an
extensive private collection, and as an official of the Laboratorio de Zoologia,
Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Santa Cruz, has access to the collections of that
organization. These circumstances presented a unique opportunity for a bio-
geographic study, andthe two entomologists, together withthe third, E. Morales
Agacino, an orthopterist with especial interest in Iberian, North African, and
Canarian species, availed themselves of it to collaborate in the following re-
port, based on the several collections listed above.
During the last fifty years many publications have appeared dealing, in
part, with the Tenerifean orthopteroids. Notable among them are papers by
Chopard (1942, 1946, 1954), Gardner (1960), Johnsen (1970), Willemse (1936,
1949, 1950), Willemse and Bruijning (1949), and Uvarov (1948), which provide
an incomplete faunal list and scattered notes on habits and distribution. Re-
cently, Holzapfel (1970) discussed in detail the systematics and distribution of
the Canarian Acridoidea, and contributed much to an understanding of the bio-
geography of that superfamily. However, there is still neither an up-to-date
list of the entire Tenerifean fauna nor a detailed presentation of the species'
distribution and habits. The present study should help to eliminate that gap
in the literature.
GEOGRAPHIC AND PHYSICAL FEATURES. The Canarian Archipelago
is comprised of thirteen subtropical volcanic islands, seven of which are in-
habited, lying off the Atlantic coast of Africa at a point approximately 195 kilo-
meters from Cape Juby (Riode Oro), 1, 111 kilometers from Gibraltar, andclose
to the Tropic of Cancer. Tenerife, the largest of the included islands, has an
area of 2,053 square kilometers. It is a triangular-shaped body of land whose
hohis project was supported by Grant No. 5560, Penrose Fund, Ameri-
can Philosophical Society, and by a Faculty Research Award from the Gradu-
ate Division of Wayne State University. These grants were for research by the
first author during the summer of 1970.
2Gangwere is Professor, Department of Biology, Wayne State University,
Detroit; Morales Martin, Profesor Mercantil, Poeta Tomas Morales 17, Santa
Cruz; and Morales Agacino,Chief, Departamento de Protecciona la Naturaleza
y al Medio Ambiente, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agronomicas, Madrid.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
vertices are the northeastern Punta de Anaga, the southern Punta de Rasca, and
the northwestern Punta de Teno. The coasts are narrow, often in the form of
rocky, precipitous cliffs, and seldom with beaches or natural ports. The sur-
face is coursed by a central cordillera that extends like a backbone from Anaga
to Teno, and is responsible for relief unusual in an area so small. The island
rises abruptly from the sea, reaches 1, 000 meters above sea level only a few
kilometers inland, and exceeds 2,000 meters at Las Canadas near the center
of the island. Las Canadas is a giant crater from which arises, in turn, the
newer volcano Pico de Teide, whose cone thrusts 3, 716 meters above sea level
into the sky. (See Plate V). 3
The Canaries presumably arose from the sea during the Miocene, and
from that time to the present Tenerife has been subjected to repeated volcanism,
most recently during the 1909 eruptions of Volcan Chinyero. The soil is thin,
even in the woods, where it seldom extends more than 50 centimeters deep. It
has developed fromthe superposition of various volcanic layers of different age,
modified by weathering and erosion, and cut here and there by ravines, or bar-
vyancos, of varying depth. The barrancos are authentic geologic fissures that
act as temporary streams during the rainy season. There are practically no
creeks, other regular water courses, or natural wells on the island; hence, the |
inhabitants rely on artificial water tunnels excavated from the mountainsides
for drinking and irrigation.
CLIMATE. The Canarian Archipelago is close to the Tropic of Cancer,
and the shores are washed by the Gulf Stream and blown by the northeasterly
trade winds, or Alistos. Consequently, the climate is subtropical in nature,
and characterized by minimal seasonal and diel fluctuations in temperature,
humidity, and wind. The temperature of the surface waters of the sea inshore
is approximately 22 degrees C. in summer and 18 degrees C. in winter; and on
land near sea level the lowest mean monthly temperature (January) is 15.3 de-
grees C., while the highest (August) is only 22.4 degrees C. The mean month-
ly relative humidity is remarkably constant, ranging from 53% to 66% at Santa
Cruz and averaging higher inthe north. However, the conditions at particular
stations vary according to exposure and elevation. The general conditions range
from hot and dry at sea level, to rain forest at moderate windward elevations,
to alpine on the high mountains, and the southern section is drier and more
wind-blown than is the northern. (See Table II).
The central mountain range extending the length of the island has already
been mentioned. From easttowest, respectively, it arises abruptly at the Ana-
ga Peninsula; quickly reaches elevations in excess of 1,000 meters above sea
level at points in the Mercedes Mountains; declines below 600 meters of eleva-
tion in the Laguna area; rises again at the Esperanza Mountains; continues with
increasing peaks that terminate eventually at lofty Teide; and then falls at Teno.
This orography has important consequences with respect to the cloud-carrying
winds approaching the island from the northeast. The cloud belt ranges from
approximately 800 meters of altitude to 2,000 or more meters during the win-
ter, but only about 600 to 1, 200 meters during summer. Therefore, the clouds
readily clear the island when in the high, winter configuration, but in summer
are trapped and concentrated along the northern coast, except at the ''Laguna
Belt,'' where some filter past to the south. As aresult, there are two major
climatologic areas in Tenerife: a lushly vegetated, fertile northern zone of
greater humidity and rainfall that lies buried beneath a thick cloud bank during
much of the summer, and a drier southern zone, with reduced rainfall, and
supporting an arid vegetation.
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 3
Most days are clear or feature intermittent clouds that pass rapidly over
the island, but the degree of cloudiness varies with season and location. Rains
are seasonal, beginning in late September or October, reaching their peak in
November, and declining gradually from December through March. By April
and May precipitation reaches comparatively low levels, and from June into
September it virtually ceases. Thus, the rainy season coincides with fall and
winter, but the temperatures then prevailing are mild, so the period is one of
luxuriant plant growth and flowering in all regions except the high mountains.
Likewise, the dry season coincides with summer heat, causing a pronounced
browning and desiccation of the vegetation in all except the most mesic environ-
ments.
FLORA. The plant communities developed on Tenerife vary with soil,
exposure, elevation, and other factors. From the periphery of the island in-
ward, Ceballos and Ortuno (1951) listed: 1) sparsely vegetated rocky or sandy
beaches or cliffs, 2) coastal scrub, 3) scattered remains of once-extensive ju-
niper forests, 4) laurel forest and heather, 5) pine forest, 6) subalpine scrub,
and 7) alpine barrens. The more important with respect to the Orthopteroidea
are discussed below. (See Plate V).
The semidesert coastal scrub zone, a region comprising almost half of
Tenerife's area, occurs throughout the periphery of the island, but is best de-
veloped in the south. It is a hot, arid, rock-strewn zone populated by a re-
duced number of xerophilic plants including cacti, agave, aloe, spurges (Eu-
phorbia), and the decumbent ice plant Mesembryanthemum.
In the cloud-belt area along the northern face of the island the coastal
scrub yields to evergreen laurel forest(so-called Laurisilva). This plant com-
munity of lauraceous thickets, and with well-developed undergrowth, was once
extensive at moderate elevations along the entire windward side, but has been
reduced by man's activities, so that the few remaining stands are restricted
to the comparatively isolated Anaga Peninsula. There it intermingles with
arborescent heather (Fayal-brezal), and constitutes a living remnant of the Ter-
tiary rain forests of Europe, now extinct on the continent (Lems, 1960).
At levels above 1, 000 to 1,500 meters of elevation the laurel and heather
- plant communities are supplanted by pine forest (Pinar). These extensive co-
niferous woodlands are of several types, but the dominant species is Pznus
canariensis, a now-indigenous pine that, during the Tertiary Epoch, also grew
in Europe. P. canariensis forms magnificent, thick forests in Tenerife, but
supports an impoverished undergrowth, so the insect fauna associated with it
is reduced.
At approximately 2,000 meters above sea level there appears a subalpine
scrub zone (Retama-codeso), chiefly of the legume shrub Spartocytisus nubi-
genus interspersed with a reduced number of herbs. The few plant species
there occur in widely separated patches that take root in volcanic ash covered
by sand and pumice.
Above approximately 2,700 meters of elevation the subalpine scrub gives
way to austere alpine barrens. Once into the latter, nothing grows except a
lichen, a moss, and Viola cheiranthifolia, found living in the lava up to with-
in a few meters of the very summit of Teide.
The foregoing concerns the natural regions of Tenerife, but many parts of
the island are not natural, being extensively cultivated, and here andthere ur-
banized. The most important crop plant grown is banana, but orange, tobac-
co, tomato, potato, grain, almond, onion, and many other crops are planted.
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
Along the roadsides are found eucalyptus, cedar, mimosa, casuarina, palm,
and other trees, as well as a profusion of flowering jasmine, heliotrope, da-
tura, geranium, bougainvillea, magnolia, poinsettia, and other tropical and
subtropical vines, shrubs, and herbs, many of them introduced.
The flora of Tenerife is incredibly extensive and diversified for so small
an area. Ina total land area of only 2, 053 square kilometers are found 1, 079
species of vascular plants, 91 of which are endemic to this island and another
247 endemic to the Canaries and related islands (Lems, 1960). This flora, an
admixture of the native and the introduced, is comprised largely of Mediterra-
nean, endemic, and cosmopolitan species, but also includes Ethiopian and other
elements, mostly of a tropical or subtropical nature.
Approximately one-third of the Canarian plants are endemic. This height-
‘ened incidence of endemism presumably stems from geographic isolation and
distinct ecological zonation and stratification, stemming from an orography- .
induced multiplicity of climates and microclimates--hence, much of the inter-
est that the Archipelago holds for botanists. No less significant is the exist-
ence in the Canaries of certain Tertiary species. These plants, which include
the laurels mentioned earlier, as well as the Canary Pine and the Canary Drag-
on-tree (Dracaena draco), a gnarled tree lily, probably reached the islands
during the Miocene or Pliocene, and constitute a present-day reproduction of
the ancient forests that once prevailed in southern Europe; today they are ex-
tinct on the continent, represented only by fossils (Lems, 1960).
COLLECTION LOCALITIES. One hundred twenty-nine collection locali-
ties are herein cited for Tenerife. They are alphabetized and numbered,
which permits space-saving numerical designation in Table I. The code is as
follows:
1) Adeje; 2) Afur; 3) Agua Garcia; 4) Agua Garcia, Ravelo de; 5) Aguaman-
sa; 6) Aguamansa, Los Organos de; 7) Aguirre, Monte; 8) Anaga, Monte; 9) Ar-
ico; 10) Arafo; 11) Arico Viejo; 12) Arico, Las Montanetas de; 13) Bailadero=
El Bailadero; 14) Bajamar; 15) Bermeja, Montana; 16) Buenavista; 17) Bufadero,
Barranco de=Barranco Bufadero; 18) Canadas=Las Canadas del Teide; 19) Can-
delaria; 20) Catalanes, Alto de; 21) Chio; 22) Cristianos=Los Cristianos; 23)
Cuesta=La Cuesta; 24) Cuesta, Montana Guerra de la; 25) Diego Hernandez,
Canada de; 26) Esperanza=La Esperanza; 27) Esperanza, Hoya de las Raices
de la; 28) Fuente Fria; 29) Fuente Guillen=Hortigal Alto; 30) Fuente Joco; 31)
Galletas=Las Galletas; 32) Garachico; 33) Garachico, La Montaneta, Los Cas-
tanos de; 34) Gigantes=Los Gigantes; 35) Granadilla; 36) Granadilla, Pinar de;
37) Grande, Barranco=Barranco Grande; 38) Guajara, Pie de; 39) Guamasa;
40) Guancheros, Canada de los; 41) Guayonje, Barranco de; 42) Guerra, Valle
de; 43) Guimar; 44) Guimar, Arenales de; 45 Guimar, Montana Grande de;
46) Guimar, Volcan de; 47) Hierro, Barranco del; 48) Hondo, Barranco=Bar-
ranco Hondo; 49) Icod; 50) Icod, Las Abiertas de; 51) Icod, Pinar de; 52) Icod,
Volcan Chinyero de; 53) Igueste; 54) Igueste de S. Andres, Carretera de; 55)
Infierno, Barranco del; 56) Izana; 57) Jardina; 58) Jimenez, Valle de; 59) Jun-
cos, Barranco de los; 60) Laguna=La Laguna; 61) Laguna, Gallardina; 62) La-
guna, San Roque de la; 63) Laguneta; 64) Laguneta Alta; 65) Lagunetas=Las La-
gunetas; 66) Lena, Barranco de la; 67) Llano los Loros; 68) Llano de Maja;
69) Martianez, Barranco de; 70) Masca; 71) Masca, Valle de; 72) Matanza=La
Matanza; 73) Medano=El Medano; 74) Medano, Arenales del; 75) Medano, Mon-
tana Roja del; 76) Medida, Costa de la; 77) Mercedes=Las Mercedes; 78) Mesa
Mota; 79) Mesas=Las Mesas=Monte de las Mesas; 80) Monton de Trigo, Cana-
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 5
da del; 81) Ninfa, Barranco de la; 82) Ofra, Montana de; 83) Orotava=La Oro-
tava; 84) Poris de Abona; 85) Portillo=El Portillo; 86) Portillo, Canada del;
87) Puerto de la Cruz; 88) Punta del Hidalgo; 89) Rambla=La Rambla; 90) Re-
alejo; 91) Rodeos=Los Rodeos; 92) Roque de Caramujo; 93) San Andres; 94) San
Andres, Barranco de; 95) San Andres, Carretera de; 96) San Diego; 97) San
Isidro; 98) San Isidro, Carretera de; 99) San Jose, Barranco de; 100) San Juan
de la Rambla; 101) San Juan, Puerto de; 102) Santa Cruz; 103) Santa Cruz, Bar-
rio Salud Alto de; 104) Santa Cruz, Finca Oramas de; 105) Santa Ursula; 106)
Santa Ursula, Finca Malpais de; 107) Santiago, Valle de; 108) Santos, Barranco
de=Barranco Santos; 109) Sauzal; 110) Seco, Barranco de=Barranco Seco; 111)
Silos, Monte de los=Monte del Agua; 112) Tabares, Valle de; 113) Taco, Mon-
tana de; 114) Tacoronte; 115) Taganana; 116) Taganana, Vueltas de; 117) Tahodio,
Barranco de=Barranco Tahodio; 118) Tahodio, Charca de; 119) Tanque=El
Tanque; 120) Tegueste; 121) Teide, Alta Vista del; 122) Tejina; 123)Tejina, Cos-
ta de; 124) Ten-Bel, Las Galletas; 125) Teno; 126) Tigaiga, Ladera de; 127) Ve-
ga=La Vega; 128) Vilaflor; 129)Vilaflor, Pinar de.
RESULTS
The results of this study are summarized in the Biological Notes and in
Table I. That table, presented in the final section of this report, gives a pro-
visional list of the Tenerifean species, their world distribution, their distri-
bution within the island, their Tenerifean distribution type, and their season-
al periodism.
DISCUSSION
FAUNA. One would expect the Canarian orthopteroid fauna, an insular
assemblage, to be more impoverished than are the continental faunae at the
same general latitude, and indeed this is the case; the Canaries correspond in
latitude to southern Morocco, where the fauna is undeniably richer. However,
for a fauna isolated on a small archipelago separated by a wide expanse of wa-
ter from others, the Canarian fauna is comparatively rich and diverse. That
of Tenerife, the only Canarian fauna here treated, numbers 88 species (13
Blattoidea, 7 Mantoidea, 12 Tettigonoidea, 15 Grylloidea, 29 Acridoidea, and
12 Dermaptera) belonging to 31 subfamilies and 58 genera. Thus, this fauna
is reasonably representative, for among its species are included members of
all major superfamilies except the Phasmoidea, or walking-sticks. (See Ta-
ble I).
Much of the interest that the Tenerifean fauna has elicited in the past is
based not on numbers of species and groups but on the presence of species with
unusual geographic distribution. Many are autocthonous; a total of 24 of the
species (27%) and 6 of the genera (10%) are endemic either to Tenerife or to
the Canaries in general. The percentage of endemic species per group varies
somewhat, ranging from 58% (Dermaptera), to 33% (Tettigonoidea), to 29%
(Mantoidea), to 23% (Blattoidea), to 21% (Acridoidea), to 13% (Grylloidea). Sev-
eral of the endemics appear to be relicts from faunae that in long-gone ages
inhabited other parts of the world. A good example is Anataelia canariensis,
a representative of the archaic earwig group Protodermaptera (Fernandez,
1966).
The affinities of the Tenerifean fauna are mostly North African, fora
good number of its species are either native to, or closely related to, forms
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
of nearby Morocco and related lands. Nevertheless, it also contains many gen-
eral Mediterranean, Ethiopian, and cosmopolitan species. An examination of
Table I reveals that 30 Tenerifean species are Mediterranean or Mediterrane-
an- Palearctic in world distribution; 16 species Ethiopian, Mediterranean and
Ethiopian, or Mediterranean and Afro-Asian; 14 species cosmopolitan or tro-
picopolitan; 4 species essentially Holarctic; and the remaining 24 species en-
demic. With respect to the Tenerifean genera 15 prove to be essentially Med-
iterranean or Mediterranean-Palearctic in world distribution; 2 genera Ethio-
pian; 4 genera occur both within the Ethiopian and the Palearctic realms; 19
genera cosmopolitan or tropicopolitan; ll genera globally widespread, being
Ethiopian, Palearctic, Oriental, and sometimes even Australian or Neotrop-
ical in distribution; and 6 genera endemic.
One-hundred per cent of the autocthonous species of the superfamilies
Blattoidea, Mantoidea, Tettigonoidea, Grylloidea, and the order Dermaptera
prove to be either brachypterous or apterous in at least one of the sexes. This
suggests a direct, positive correlation between endemism and meiopterism
(brachyptery or aptery), a relationship not invalidated by the fact that several
non-endemic species also have reduced wings. However, the correlation is
not invariable, for 6 species of Acridoidea are endemic to Tenerife, yet only
two are brachypterous.
These facts have a bearing on adaptive radiation. Water is a barrier to
orthopteroids and many other terrestrial insect species, which means that a
given island comes to be inhabited only by those forms able to immigrate.
Once a terrestrial population has surmounted this barrier, and has become
established in the isolated environment, it may, comparatively speaking, be
without competition, and quickly undergo adaptive radiation to meet the vary-
ing requirements of particular habitats. In Tenerife and similar islands,
strongly isolated geographically, and also highly zoned and stratified ecologi-
cally, the potential habitats open to species are numerous, and the occupying
fauna may develop in diversity beyond that normally expected.
Based on the foregoing, it is apparent that Tenerife has a comparatively
high percentage of endemic species that, with the exception of the acridoids,
are of reduced vagility owing to meiopterism. Moreover, they tend to be spe-
cialized in habitat selection. Some of them, for example, the earwig Anatae-
lia canariensis and the katydid Canariola nubigena, could be relict forms that
long have inhabited Tenerife, but most are assuredly recent to the island.
Clearly, even the brachypterous and apterous orthopteroids are capable of be-
ing transported passively the approximate 195 kilometers from the African
mainland, and many could have come to occupy the island in that manner,
while the stronger fliers, such as the locust Schistocerca gregaria, can easi-
ly negotiate this distance by wing.
The evolution of distributional patterns, endemism, and their possible re-
lation to meiopterism are of tremendous interest, but require detailed analysis
of orthopteroid distributions on other islands of the archipelago and on the con-
tinent. Inasmuch as the data herein pertain only to Tenerife they are insuffi-
cient to enable anything more ambitious than has already been attempted. How-
ever, the reader may turn to Holzapfel's excellent discussion of these matters
with respect to the Canarian Acridoidea (1970).
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS. A provisional list of species was compiled
using the collections of M. Morales Martin, those of the Laboratorio de Zoolo-
gia, and those of the Instituto Espanol de Entomologia. This list, modified in
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution "
accordance with recent literature, was then used as the system against which
all available distributional data were plotted. The locality data of each spe-
cies were plotted on an individual map, the maps compared with one another,
and from these data a classification of distributional types erected. This in-
formation, together with remarks on world distribution and seasonal period-
ism, is presented in Table I.
The basic information just mentioned is, of course, nothing more than a
series of dots on a map, each representing a particular locality from which
one or more specimens of a species have been taken. A hypothetical distri-
bution was derived therefrom by assuming that the range is continuous, which
allows the dots to be interconnected to form an area on the map generally sug-
gestive of the species’ true distribution. For example, if all records are clus-
tered along the northern coast, a northern distribution is assumed. Natural-
ly, the records are incomplete and not necessarily representative, though they
are a product of random collecting by many entomologists over a period of
three quarters of a century. One example is sufficient. Pattern VIIi (Plate
IV) is a distribution in which a species occurs in the southern coastal area ad-
jacent to the west coast but is lacking in the west, a similar area. Failure to
be recorded from the west could stem from the fact that it does not live there,
but is probably a consequence of collecting effort. The western area is remov-
ed from the island's two big population centers, and until recently did not even
have a good road that enabled ready access to it.
An elaborate classification of the biogeographic areas of Tenerife was ad-
vanced by Ceballos and Ortuno (1951), based primarily on plant distribution.
(See Plate V). Therefore, it was desirable to plot the orthopteroid distribu-
tions obtained during the present study against their published scheme. The
fit, or lack thereof, was determined by using the following criteria: 1) the
range hypothesized for a given species is based primarily on the available dis-
tributional records; 2) the range is broadened to include that part of the natu-
ral region in which the records fit, and is terminated at the adjacent physical
and/or climatic barrier; and 3) the range may overlap two or more natural re-
gions, but there can be no gap between.
The result obtained by plotting the orthopteroid distributions against the
Ceballos-Ortuno zones proved less than satisfactory. Approximately one-
third of the orthopteroid species fitted adequately into one or another distribu-
tional patterns consistent with the Ceballos-Ortuno scheme, but one-third did
not fit at all, and another one-third proved intermediate in this respect, nei-
ther violating the scheme nor being entirely consistent with it. This is consis-
tent with Holzapfel's findings (1970); she concluded that it is not feasible to at-
tempt classification of the Canarian acridoids according to distribution in flor-
istic zones.
It was considered that a much better fit might be obtained by plotting the
orthopteroid distributions against elevation as modified by exposure. The fit,
or lack thereof, was investigated using the same criteria as before, and the
results indicate a gratifying overall agreement. Only two species, Canariola
nubigena and Guanchia canariensis, have ranges inconsistent with elevational
zones aS modified by exposure; four other species proved somewhat inconsis-
tent; and the remaining 76 species were consistent with the new scheme.
PATTERNS OF DISTRIBUTION. The orthopteroid distributions examined
fall into 37 provisional patterns (explained in Plates I-IV) that can be aggrega-
ted into seven major categories, as follows:
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
I, Ubiquitous or essentially ubiquitous. 8 spp. The insects with thisdis-
tribution are recorded from throughout the island, except sometimes the heights
of Las Canadas or the western coast.
TI, Southern. 8 spp. Two of these distributions are little more than ex-
panded southern coastal distributions, while the third (Pattern Ila) encompas-
ses all but the northern coast of the island.
Ill. Eastern. 5 spp. These distributions ipewiee roughly the eastern
third of the island, except for Pattern IIId, which is a narrow tongue-like dis-
tribution extending from Santa Cruz to Esperanza.
IV. Northern. 14 spp. These insects have ranges that are little more
than expanded northern coastal distributions, except for Pattern IVa, which
takes in the entire north, as well as the central heights of Las Canadas, and
Pattern IVe, which includes the northcentral area, as well as a tongue of land
curling southward around Las Canadas.
V. Eastern crescent. 7 spp. This distribution is characterized by occu-
pancy of both northern and southern coasts as joined inthe east. Such patterns
are but expanded coastal distributions, and their failure to extend onto the west-
ern coast is possibly explicable on the basis of insufficient collecting.
VI. Interior. ll spp. These distributions involve one or another segments
of the central mountain range that extends the length of the island from Anaga
to Teno.
VII. Coastal. 29 spp. These littoral distributions, from coastline up to
about 600 meters above sea level, involve the entire coast, or one or another
parts of it, and sometimes the ''Laguna Belt."’ The latter is a low, inland ex-
tension of coast between the Mercedes and Esperanza Mountains, to the east
and west, respectively. (See Patterns VIId, Vile, and VIIf). The southern and
western coasts of the island are similar, so the absence of certain southern
coastal species from the west (for example, Pattern VIIi) is possibly explica-
ble on the basis of insufficient collecting.
Based on the foregoing we can characterize the distributional patterns of
the major orthopteroid groups as follows:
The Blattoidea have an essentially coastal distribution; only one species,
Arbiblatta bivittata, extends any great distance into the interior.
One mantis, Ameles limbata, is virtually ubiquitous ; two others, A. gra-
cilis and Pseudoyersinia teydeana, have interior distributions; and the remain-
ing species are essentially coastal insects.
Except for the ubiquitous Phaneroptera nana sparsa the Tettigonoidea, or
katydids, are restricted to the north or northeast of the island, especially in-
terior zones.
The interior Gryllomorpha canariensis, the eastern Acheta meridionalis,
the northern Gryllus bimaculatus, and the northern and central Oecanthus pel-
lucens are non-coastal species of crickets. The remaining Grylloidea are es-
sentially coastal in distribution, though some extend well inland.
The distributional patterns of the Acridoidea do not readily lend them-
selves to characterization, for, as a group, they are highly varied. Some
species are essentially ubiquitous; some coastal; some eastern; some north-
ern; and some are interior forms.
The Dermaptera, like the Acridoidea, are variable in their distribution.
Some species are distributed throughout the north or the south of the island;
some in the interior; and some along the coast, often with considerable exten-
sions inland.
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 9
ORTHOPTEROID FAUNAL REGIONS. According to the Ceballos-Ortuno
scheme (1951), based primarily on plant distribution, the island of Tenerife is
characterized by the following biogeographic regions: low scrub, juniper for-
est (Sabinar), laurel forest (Laurisilva), pine forest (Pinar), scrub (Escobo-
nal), subalpine scrub (Retama-codeso), and alpine barrens (Violeta). (See
Plate V). We have noted that the island's orthopteroid distributions are incon-
sistent with this plan. There is partial agreement, but, of course, that is ex-
pected, for the Ceballos-Ortuno zones are themselves predicated in part on
elevation, climate, and exposure.
Based on the present study, there is an additional zone to be recognized,
the beach zone; and the juniper forest, escobonal scrub, and alpine barrens
are not important in the distribution of orthopteroids; the laurel forest is of
some importance, though it does not support a unique fauna; and the low scrub,
pine forest, and subalpine scrub are unique areas populated by distinct orthop-
teroid faunae.
Let us comment on the important zones, paying especial attention to or-
thopteroids unique and exclusive to them (marked u, below) and those so com-
monly encountered there as to be considered typical of them (¢, below).
The beach zone features a rocky or sandy substrate, black because of the
island's volcanic origin, and a depauperate vegetation. Several orthopteroids
belong here: Acvotylus i. insubricus (t), Anataelia canariensis (u), Labidura
riparia (u), Mogoplistes squamiger (u), Wernerella picteti (t).
The sublitioral scrub zone is best developed along the southern coast at
elevations below 600 meters. It is an arid, semidesert region supporting a
reduced number of xerophilic plants. The orthopteroid fauna that frequents
it is best characterized by: Calliptamus plebeius (t), Oedipoda canariensis
i“ Sphingonotus spp. (t), Stenohippus epacromioides (u), Wernerella picteti
t).
The tropical forest zone, or laurel forest, is an area of lush plant growth
developed in that part of the northeastern face of Tenerife that is exposed to
the summer cloud belt. Here, among the wooded ravines occurs a somewhat
distinctive orthopteroid fauna including: Arbiblatta bivittata (t), Ariagona mar-
garitae (t), Calliphona k8nigi (t), Platycleis spp. (t), Tessellana tessellata (t).
However, several of these elements are shared with the central forest zone,
and none seems to be unique.
The central forest zone, or pine zone, occurs at middle elevations up to
about 2,000 meters above sea level, and supports meadows and other kinds of
communities, as well as luxuriant pine forests. Prominent among the orthop-
teroids that occur here are: Acvotylus patruelis (t), Ameles gracilis (u), Cal-
liptamus plebeius (t), Canariola willemsei (u), Platycleis sabulosa (t), Tes-
sellana tessellata (t).
The subalpine scrub zone is located above 2, 000 meters of elevation. It
is populated by a sparse growth of herbs and legume shrubs separated by ex-
panses of bare ground, and is characterized by: Avrbiblatta bivittata (t), Cal-
liptamus plebeius (t), Pseudoyersinia teydeana (u), Sphingonotus willemsei (u).
The above classification of Tenerifean distributional zones is somewhat
different from that postulated by Holzapfel (1970), who based hers on the occur-
rence of acridoids throughout the entire archipelago. She recognized open
beach, below 300 meter xerophytic, 300-500 meter forest, and above 1,500
meter subalpine vegetational belts. The differences between the two systems
appears mostly discretionary. Whether one accepts 300 meters of elevation,
600 meters, or some figure between those values as the boundary betweenthe
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
xerophytic and forest communities depends on a number of variables, including
location (whether on the northern coast, where the lower estimate is preferable,
or on the southern coast, where the higher figure is probably more realistic), as
well as the species of concern. Holzapfel dealt only with the acridoids, where-
as the present report concerns the Orthopteroidea as a whole. Likewise, the
choice between 1,500 meters of elevation or 2,000 meters must be based in good
part on discretion, for that boundary, too, varies with location. Finally, there
is the rain forest that is here recognized, though with reservations, but is ag-
gregated with the general forest category by Holzapfel.
PHENOLOGY. The seasonal occurrence of the Orthopteroidea is as much
an aspect of their distribution as is place of occurrence. Therefore, it is of in-
terest to consider their annual cycle on Tenerife. However, at the outset it
must be stressed that the seasonal data available to the writers (see Table I) are
in some cases fragmentary.
In general, the Orthopteroidea respond to the mild, subtropical Canarian
climate in the expected manner. They tend to be active all year long, and ei-
ther nymphs or adults may be taken at any time from within the preferred habi-
tats. These remarks pertain, of course, to species found below 1,500 meters
of elevation and especially to littoral forms in areas exposed to the sun. In con-
trast, the orthopteroids that are restricted to subalpine and other high zones are
forced into a diapause during the unfavorable winter months, and do not appear
as nymphs until spring and as adults until summer.
Inherent within most orthopteroids is a pronounced population fluctuation
that is only in part taken into account in Table I; all that table shows is that anin-
dividual of a given species was collected during a particular month, but that spe-
cies may actually have been so reduced in number that it was almost non-exis-
tent at that time. Such population fluctuations are maximized in the case of sub-
alpine forms and minimized in littoral forms.
Several patterns of seasonal occurrence are discernible with respect tothe
major orthopteroid groups of Tenerife (Table I):
The Blattoidea are coastal forms, and, in accordance with that subtropi-
cal distribution, can be found adult all year long. The majority of the species
are domiciliary, and in cases where sufficient records are available appear to
produce many generations per year. The native species, too, are adult through-
out the year, and at some points within their range are probably also continuous
reproducers throughout the year.
The Mantoidea have an adult occurrence that encompasses spring and sum-
mer and occasionally fall.
The Tettigonoidea prove more variable than do the foregoing, but all ex-
cept the ubiquitous Phaneroptera nana sparsa have a definite seasonal periodism.
In most instances it is one in which adults occur from spring until autumn.
The Grylloidea tend to be adult throughout the year, a condition in accord-
ance with their mostly coastal distribution. It is difficult to say whether they
produce one or several generations per year, but probably those several spe-
cies that are semi-domestic are of the latter type.
Virtually all of the Acridoidea for which there are sufficient data to make
an assessment can be found in the adult condition throughout the year. The ma-
jor exceptions are Calliptamus plebetus, a ubiquitous species, Schistocerca
gregaria, a plague locust that repopulates the island as the fall winds from the
Sahara descend upon it, Sphingonotus willemsei, a subalpine species, and Oe-
daleus decorus. However, it is doubtful that the acridoids as a group produce
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution ll
more than one generation per year; they are simply long-lived.
In general, the Dermaptera give evidence of being adult throughout the
year, and most species probably have several generations per year. The pos-
sible exceptions are a few species in which the data are too incomplete to per-
mit evaluation.
BIOLOGICAL NOTES
Arbiblatta bivittata. A delicate endemic cockroach, winged in the male
sex, wingless in the female, this species is found throughout the northern part
of Tenerife. It is especially characteristic of the laurel and pine forests, where
it takes refuge in humus, soil crevices, leaf litter (especially of Aeonium), tree
hollows, and under stones. It also lives under similar conditions up to 2,500 me-
ters in the high mountains and less often in the lower zones of the north down to
300 meters above sea level. Adults are abundant all year long throughout the
range, except at Teide during the harsh winter months.
Blattella germanica. A domestic species characteristic of the coastal dis-
tricts, especially the port cities, of Tenerife. Adults occur throughout the year.
Loboptera canariensis. This small, wingless endemic is taken at Santa
Cruz and San Diego, a distribution within the ''Laguna Belt, '' which is an inland
extension of coast between the Esperanza and Mercedes Mountains.
Loboptera decipiens. Under leaves, stones, and debris in woodlands from
Esperanza through into Mercedes.
Loboptera fortunata, Another endemic, this moderate-sized, wingless
cockroach is found along the northern coast and Anaga Peninsula of Tenerife. In
the latter it is readily taken under stones at El Bailadero, but is never truly a-
bundant. It is adult throughout the year.
Blatta orientalis. A domestic species that occurs at El Medano and La La-
guna, a southern coastal distribution.
Periplaneta americana. A domestic species with a coastal distribution in
Tenerife and especially characteristic of the port cities. Adults are taken
throughout the year.
Periplaneta australasiae. A domestic species recorded from the ''Laguna
Belt, '' a coastal distribution.
Periplaneta brunnea. The single specimen taken of this domestic species
is from La Laguna.
Leucophaea maderae. This cosmotropical cockroach, another domestic
Species, has a coastal distribution in Tenerife.
Pycnoscelis surinamensis. A domestic cockroach found in cities and vil-
lages throughout coastal Tenerife. Adults are not recorded from autumn, but
probably occur then too.
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
Zetha vestita. This small cockroach, winged in the male sex, vestigial-
winged in the female, is an adventive from the Neotropical Realm. It is here
recorded from boxes of bananas in San Isidro, La Laguna, and Bajamar (anoth-
er version of the ''Laguna Belt'') and from Santa Ursula along the northern
coast. It is adult throughout the year.
Leurolestes circumvagans. A few specimens of this domestic cockroach
are at hand from Granadilla and Santa Cruz, a southern coastal distribution.
Ameles gracilis. This mantis, winged in the male sex, vestigial-winged
in the female, has an inland distribution. It lives on the ground or on shrubs
from the pine forests of Esperanza through Aguamansa to the Canada de Diego
Hernandez. The available records of adults suggest a summer-fall periodism
for that life stage.
Ameles limbata. This thamnophilous mantis, similar to the preceding in
appearance, size, and habits, is more widespread, having an essentially ubi-
quitous distribution within Tenerife. Nonetheless, it is never abundant. Adults
are encountered from April through December.
Pseudoyersinia subaptera. A small vestigial-winged mantis, this endemic
has a southern distribution. It is phytophilous, generally on herbs and small
shrubs.
Pseudoyersinia teydeana. Another vestigial-winged endemic, this mantis
is found above 2,400 meters at Las Canadas del Teide, where it lives on herbs
and shrubs, and deposits its eggs below stones. It is never abundant. Adults
are encountered from March through August.
Mantis religiosa. This mantis is widespread in many parts of the Old and
New Worlds. It is found in several Tenerifean localities, but is absent from
the westand from the central heights about Teide, giving it an essentially cres-
centic distribution. It is most common near Los Rodeos and Ten-Bel, where
adults are encountered on low vegetation from June through November.
Blepharopsis mendica. This large, thamnophilous mantis inhabits dry
zones along the southern and northeastern coasts of Tenerife. Adults are re-
corded from March through October.
Hypsicorypha gracilis. This slender-bodied, phytophilous mantis has an
essentially coastal distribution, with extensions inland across the Anaga Penin-
sula. On the basis of available records, adults seem restricted to spring and
summer.
Phaneroptera nana sparsa. This small, delicate-bodied, fully winged ka-
tydid is widespread throughout the Old World, and is ubiquitous within Tenerife.
It frequents both cultivated and wild situations, and is thamnophilous. Adults
are encountered during all months of the year. .
Canariola nubigena. This endemic meconemine is a small, vestigial-wing-
ed katydid with a caudally tumid pronotum. Based on previously published in-
formation, it is known to occur in the pine forests of Aguamansa (Willemse,
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 13
1936). However, in recent years it has also proved available in numbers in
the coastal locality of Bajamar and inland in the Mercedes Forest and adjacent
areas, where it lives on herbs and shrubs. Adults are encountered in the
spring from February through June.
Canariola willemsei. This endemic is similar to C. nubigena in habits,
size, and general appearance except for its shiny body surface. It is record-
ed only from Tacoronte and Aguamansa, an inland distribution, and on the ba-
sis of the few available records seems to be mature in autumn.
Calliphona kénigi. This large, powerful predator extends throughout the
north of Tenerife, to which it is endemic. It is characteristic of inland woods
in that part of the island, but occasionally reaches lower zones, such as at Ba-
jamar, Guimar, and San Andres. Nymphs up to 3 cms. in length are easy to
find in the typical localities, where they tend to frequent buttercup flowers.
However, adults are not so often encountered, presumably owing to an arbo-
real habit. Adults have been repeatedly verified for the spring and summer
months, and are also seen infrequently through autumn.
Ariagona margaritae. A small, vestigial-winged endemic that lives inthe
north of the island, especially at the edges of laurel forest above approximate-
ly 700 meters of elevation. Typical localities are Monte de las Mercedes,
Las Lagunetas, and Monte de los Silos. It is found there among herbs, and
is adult from July through November. It is extraordinary for its leaps, which
are of unusually great velocity for a katydid of that size.
Platycleis grisea. A few specimens of this katydid are at hand from Ta-
coronte and La Esperanza, an inland distribution.
Platycleis intermedia. " A few specimens are here listed from the ''La-
guna Belt.'' Adults are recorded from April through July.
Platyclets sabulosa. ‘ This moderate-sized, fully winged katydid has a
northeastern and central distribution on Tenerife, where it is geophilous in
dry cultivated zones or wild zones, especially in the center of the island at an
elevation of approximately 500 to 1,000 meters above sea level. Records of
adults are available from March through October, but the seasonal periodism
could well extend beyond those limits.
Tessellana tessellata. Not unlike a small Platycleis (with which genus it
was grouped for many years), this species has an eastern distribution and an
adult occurrence that extends from March through November.
Decticus albifrons. This large, powerful, fully winged katydid is common
3 The members of this genus are variable, poorly understood, and diffi-
cult taxonomically, so determinations always require great care and compe-
tence. Therefore, the records included herein, as well as those of earlier
authors, should be viewed in that light.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
in cultivated fields and other open places throughout the eastern and central
parts of the island, and is phytophilous. Its adult periodism extends at least
from March through November. This rapacious predator is widespread else-
where, being found throughout the entire Mediterranean region.
Gryllus bimaculatus. A large, dark-bodied cricket with a palish suffusion
at the base of each tegmen, G. bimaculatus is the most common gryllid in the
Canary Islands, and elsewhere occurs through the whole of Africa and in ma-
jor parts of Europe and Asia. It occurs throughout Tenerife, but is most com-
mon in the coastal zones from Puerto de San Juan through Pinar de Icod to Gui-
mar and beyond through the Anaga Peninsula. It is found on the ground in cul-
tivated fields and wild situations open to the sun, and is adult throughout the
year. Occasionally plagues of this species composed of individuals of a body
size smaller than that of the resident individuals fly over from the African con-
tinent, but on their arrival do not prove noxious.
Acheta meridionalis . : Similar to A. hispanicus, below, but on the average
shorter-winged, this cricket lives in the eastern part of Tenerife, and is es-
pecially common at Barranco Grande. Its habits and seasonal periodism are
similar to those listed for A. hispanicus.
Acheta hispanicus. - This moderate-sized, fully winged cricket lives un-
der stones and debris near the banks of ponds, pools, and dry river beds. It
is essentially southern and eastern in its Tenerifean distribution, and is adult
practically all year.
Modicogryllus guanchicus. : This cricket, smaller-bodied than the preced-
ing and with slightly abbreviated wings, is found along the northern coast of
Tenerife and across the Anaga Peninsula. It is geophilous in humid places, es-
pecially near water. Isolated records of adults are available from each of the
four seasons, so it could well be adult throughout the year.
Modicogryllus palmetorum.. : Another small cricket with slightly abbre-
viated wings, this insect occurs at Barranco Bufadero and Charca de Tahodio,
a southern coastal distribution.
Tartarogryllus burdigalensis. : This widespread Mediterranean species
finds its way to Tenerife, based on one specimen taken at El Medano along the
southern coast.
Platygryllus brunneri. P This species is a moderate-sized, fully winged
geophilous cricket of tropical or subtropical distribution in the Old World. Its
scattered records from Tenerife (Puerto de San Juan to Tahodio) indicate a
southern and western coastal distribution on the island. Its adult seasonal pe-
riodism is uncertain, but could well involve the entire year.
Gryllomorpha canariensis. This small cricket, endemic to Tenerife, is
"ibid. , p
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 15
apterous. It occurs in a great arc across the interior from near Teno to Ana-
ga, but is never abundant. It appears to be most common in the forests of La
Esperanza and Las Mercedes, where it lives under rocks and debris.
Gryllodes sigillatus. This mottled brown cricket is brachypterous in the
male sex and apterous in the female. It is here recorded from La Esperanza
and Santa Cruz. Several of the Instituto specimens from the latter locality
bear the notations ''En el maiz de la Argentina" or ''Comen maiz Argentina. "'
Mogoplistes squamiger. This is a coastal form found virtually throughout
the Mediterranean area and over to Tenerife and Madeira. It is restricted to
the supratidal, or ''spray"' zone of the sea, where it lives under stones and al-
ae.
Cycloptiloides canariensis. This is a minute, apterous cricket endemic
to Tenerife. It occurs under stones and debris in Santa Cruz and across the
"Laguna Belt" to Barranco Martianez, an essentially coastal distribution.
Trigonidium cicindeloides. This minute, distinctive cricket is widely dis-
tributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of the Old World. In Tenerife
it is phytophilous in cultivated places and in wild, mesic situations within the
"laguna Belt" and over to Puerto de la Cruz on the northern coast.
Oecanthus pellucens, This well-known tree cricket has an essentially
Mediterranean distribution, though it extends into central Europe. It is also
found in Tenerife, where it has a northern and central distribution that, with
additional collecting, could prove to be virtually ubiquitous. It is thamnophi-
lous in habit, and apparently is adult all year long.
Gryllotalpa africana, This is a small species of mole cricket known from
many parts of Africa and Asia, as well as from Spain and the Canaries. It
leads a fossorial existence in humid places along the southern coast of Tene-
rife, chiefly at El] Medano and San Andres.
Paratettix meridionalis. This grouse locust extends throughout the Med-
iterranean region and into the Canaries. In Tenerife it occurs at the banks of
pools and dry river beds throughout the island, and is especially common at El
Medano and San Andres. It appears to be adult throughout the year.
Pyrgomorpha cognata. The presence of this small-bodied pyrgomorph
on Tenerife is based on a record by Gardner (1960), attributed by Holzapfel
(1970) to P. cognata. Inasmuch as Holzapfel lacked access to Gardner's ma-
terial the distributional record supplied (Puerto de la Cruz, along the north-
ern coast) remains uncertain. Nothing else is known with respect to its occur-
rence on Tenerife, but in Spain this geophilous insect frequents arid places o-
pen to the sun.
Arminda brunneri. The genus Arminda, a number of small, apterous
grasshoppers related to the Mediterranean genus Platyphyma (=Pezotettix),
was recently revised by Holzapfel (in press). These interesting insects are
endemic to the Canarian Archipelago, and tend to be restricted to particular
islands. The important species on Tenerife is A. brunnevi. It frequents
16 _ Contrib, Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
shrubby ravines and other elevated land extending from Punta de Tenoto Punta
de Anaga. Here, dwelling principally among laurel forest remnants in excess
of 1,000 meters above sea level it finds its preferred habitat, reaches its great-
est abundance, and is found adult all year long. The insect also extends south-
ward down to the onset of arid coastal scrub, living there on volcanic terrain
with a largely autocthonous vegetation, but never attains great prosperity and
disappears early. Its eclosion seems directly related to rainfall. The first
rains of the season normally. occur in September, and the insect hatches short-
ly thereafter. However, on occasion the rainy season is delayed until as late
as December, in which case it hatches at that time.
Arminda burri. This species is known from Gran Canaria. However, in
the series of Tenerifean Arminda examined by Holzapfel (1970) there was a
male specimen from La Vega that proved indistinguishable from A. burri.
Therefore, the Tenerifean record stands pending further study.
Calliptamus plebeius. This genus was recently reviewed by Jago (1963),
who found only C. plebezus on the Canarian Archipelago. On Tenerife C. ple-
bezus is ubiquitous, inhabiting arid situations ranging in elevation from near
sea level to 2,200 meters above. It is phytophilous on stout herbs and shrubs,
and is encountered in the adult condition largely during the months of June
through October. The insect is striking for its marked sexual dimorphism and
color variants.
Schistocerca gregaria. This large plague locust comes to the Canaries by
invasion from the African continent. The normal winds that affect the island,
the Trade Winds, or Alzszos, are from the northeast, but in October or there-
about they die down, and warm winds from the Sahara Desert, the Harmatan,
may descend upon the islands. In that event, and if there is an outbreak on the
continent, this locust swarms over. During the occasional plagues, as in Jan-
uary, 1954, much of Tenerife is invaded, and thousands of locusts pass over
Santa Cruz like a cloud. At-other times this semidesert species pays only spo-
radic visits. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon to See isolated individuals in
the east during the period October through November.
Scintharista n. notabilis. This xerophilous oedipodine has a southern and
northeastern coastal distribution on Tenerife. It frequents barren lava beds
and other sparsely vegetated situations extending from near sea level to 1, 400
meters above. It is especially common in San Andres, where it spends much
time in flight, producing a strong, clattering crepitation and showing reddish
wings. It is adult throughout the year.
Oedaleus decorus. This is a pale-bodied, yellow-winged grasshopper
strongly banded with dark. On Tenerife it has an interior distribution in dry,
open places from La Laguna to Aguamansa. It is especially common on herbs
in Las Lagunetas. Its adult periodism extends from April through November.
Locusta migratoria. This large plague locust, widely distributed through-
out Africa and extending into Europe and Asia, also occurs in the Canary Is-
lands, where it proves to be in the solitary phase, and is composed of smaller-
bodied individuals than on the mainland. On Tenerife its distribution is a cres-
centic one from Puerto de la Cruz in the north, to Aguamansa, to El Medano
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 17
in the south, and it appears to be especially common in Los Rodeos and Taco-
ronte. Its habitat consists of cultivated fields, open pasture, and dry shrubby
areas. It isoften highly abundant, but is never noxious. It is in the adult stage
throughout the year.
Oedipoda caerulescens. This grasshopper is listed by Holzapfel (1970) as
occurring in the south and southwest of Tenerife.
Oedipoda canariensis, This xerophile, characterized by pale bluishwing
discs, is endemic to the Canaries. It is essentially a southern and western
coastal form, though it extends considerably inland in the vicinity of the ''La-
guna Belt.'' This species, typical of the genus, inhabits rocky, sandy, or bare
ground exposed tofullsun, but is never very abundant. Records of adult occur-
rence are available for all months except February and March, so it is prob-
ably adult all year long.
Sphingonotus rubescens. 4 Based onthe literature, this species isdescrib-
ed as a darkish, often blotched oedipodine with transparent wings that lack the
typical colored disc outlined by adarkcrescent. It belongs to a genus that, like
Oedipoda, contains many xerophilous geophiles that long have posed a problem.
The group is clearly in need of revision, in connection with which Holzapfel
(1970) indicated the probable necessity of using cytogenetics and behavioral stu-
dies asa supplement to traditional methods of study. She ventured the opinion
that it is presently impossible to separate this species, S. rubescens, from
three others, S. canariensis, S. caerulans, S. savignyi, that have been repor-
ted from the littoral and semi-desert regions of Tenerife at a level generally
not exceeding 300 meters above the sea. Presently we have no recourse but to
take S. rubescens inthe old sense, though excluding it from the central heights
of Las Canadas. Interpreted this way itis virtually ubiquitous, being absent on-
ly from the highest mountains and abounding along the coasts all year long. It
is adult throughout the year, but its maximal presence coincides withsummer.
Sphingonotus savignyi is As presently understood, this contrastingly
marked species has a southern coastal distribution, and it seems to be adult
all year long.
Sphingonotus willemsei 3 According to Holzapfel (1970), thisendemic spe-
cies includes S. teydez. It occursasa geophile in the subalpine desert at ele-
vations of 2,100 meters or above, chiefly during the summer months.
Wernerella pictett. This small oedipodine is a Canarian endemic. On
Tenerife it has an essentially southern and western coastal distribution up to
about 1,000 meters above sea level. Adult records are available from all sea-
sons.
Acrotylus 1. insubricus. This pink-winged grasshopper is widespread
within the Mediterranean region, and extends over to the Canaries. On Ten-
erife it has an expanded coastal distribution in xerophilous situations usually be-
low 650 meters above sea level. It is probably adult throughout the year.
9 ped p. 13.
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
Acrotylus longipes. This yellow-winged grasshopper is not listed for
Tenerife by Holzapfel (1970). However, based on Morales Martin's specimens
compared with determined Instituto materials, and others determined by Dirsh,
it is clear that the species is represented in the fauna. It has an essentially
southern coastal distribution, and is adult throughout the year.
Acrotylus patruelis. This small, pink-winged oedipodine is even more
widespread than is A. insubricus, for it occupies roughly the same Mediterra-
nean areas, together with the greater part of Africa. Its distribution within
Tenerife is essentially ubiquitous, though it is most common in dry meadows
in the interior of the island, especially at Aguamansa. It is adult throughout
the year.
Atolopus strepens. This species, a grasshopper widespread through-
out the Mediterranean area, is common throughout the north of Tenerife. It
primarily occupies cultivated fields, pastures, and other open grassy situa-
tions, and is adult throughout the year.
Atolopus thalassinus. Also widespread, both elsewhere and in the Ca-
naries, this species is often collected together with A. strepens. It is espe-
cially abundant at Los Rodeos and Tacoronte, but occurs throughout the island,
except in the central heights. Adults can be taken at any time during the year.
Stenohippus epacromioides. There appears to be but a single species
of Stenohippus on Tenerife. However, the name to use for it is uncertain.
These delicate gomphocerines are variable, difficult to determine, and the lit-
erature confusing. Until more is known it seems best to use S. epacromioides
(the designation used by Uvarov, 1926) in place of S. bonneti (cited by Chopard,
1943, and Holzapfel, 1970). The insect occurs along the southern and western
coasts of the island, and is possibly most abundant near San Andres in the
southeast. It is a graminicole, always being in association with lush grasses.
It is adult all year long.
Doctostaurus maroccanus. This species, a plague locust whose gre-
garious phase has often reached outbreak populations in countries bordering
the Mediterranean Sea, extends well past the Mediterranean world deep into
central Asia. It also occurs, in the solitary phase, in dry, open situations
throughout the north of Tenerife, and is especially common at Las Lagunetas
and San Andres. It probably occurs in the adult stage throughout the year, but,
as indicated by gaps in the record, the adult numbers probably decline mark-
edly during winter.
Truxalis nasuta. This large, distinctive grasshopper has a wide dis-
tribution in the Ethiopian and Mediterranean worlds. It is also known from
Gran Canaria and, based on a record by Gardner, 1960, from Tenerife. If
the latter record is valid, that places it near Puerto de la Cruz. Little else
is known about its Canarian occurrence. However, in view of our knowledge
of its distribution in Spain its habitat is predictable: cultivated and uncultivat-
ed land, often sunny hillsides, where it is always in close association with
grasses for food and perching.
Anataelia canariensis. This small, apterous earwig is the sole spe-
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 19
cies of a genus of Protodermaptera. The insect is endemic to Tenerife and |
Gomera. On Tenerife it lives along the northern coast from Bajamar to Pun-
ta de Teno, which area constitutes the most ancient terrain of the island.
This distribution, together with the earwig's occurrence on the geologically
similar Playa de San Sebastian of Gomera, suggests that the insect is a relict
form, and opens the possibility that the two islands were united at some time
during the geological past. The earwig's habitat is under stones in the supra-
tidal, or ''spray,'' zone immediately adjacent to the sea, from which area it
never strays more than a few meters (Escalera, 1922, Fernandez, 1966). It
is apparently adult throughout the year, though its numbers become greatly de-
pleted during the summer months.
Labidura riparia. The cosmopolitan Labidura riparia frequents sandy
beaches along the southern coast of Tenerife. It is associated with the under-
side of dry algae, and seems to be adult virtually all year.
Euborellia annulipes. This small, wingless earwig is cosmopolitan
elsewhere in the world, and proves to be widespread throughout the Canarian
Archipelago. On Tenerife it has a crescentic distribution, occurring in the
east of the island and from there across the northern and southern shores. It
lives under stones, often at the edge of the sea, and is adult throughout the
year.
Anisolabis maritima. This earwig, also cosmopolitan and wingless, is
essentially a southern coastal species, though on occasion it proceeds consid-
erable distances inland. Its habits are similar to those of E. annulipes, being
found under stones and often near the sea.
Anisolabis maxima. This large-bodied earwig, like its two relatives,
E. annulipes and A. maritima, is apterous, but it differs from those twocos-
mopolitan species in that it is autocthonous. It occurs in forests throughout
the north of Tenerife, but is most common at Monte de los Silos, Las Canadas
del Teide, and the Anaga Peninsula. It lives under stones, and is adult all
year long.
Labia minor. This minute earwig with abbreviated tegmina is cosmo-
politan in world distribution. On Tenerife it is found along the northern coast
from Puerto de la Cruz to Taganana, with an extension inland at the ''Laguna
Belt.'' It is usually found under stones, debris, rock pile fences, and the foun-
dations of houses.
Perirrhytus edentulus. This small earwig with abbreviated tegmina is
found in Madeira as well as in several of the Canary Islands. On Tenerife it
has a northern distribution, extending most of the way across the island. Adult
records are from winter, spring, and summer, suggesting possible imaginal
absence in fall.
Forficula auricularia. This familiar earwig is Holarctic in distribu -
eo Instituto Espanol de Entomologia record of Anataelia canariensis
from Guimar is probably a mistake, and one from La Laguna is assuredly
incorrect.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
tion. On Tenerife its distributional pattern is crescentic, and with further
study could prove to be circular, encompassing all but the central heights a-
bout Teide. It lives in close association with stones, debris, and other kinds
of shelter, and is adult throughout the year.
Guanchia cabrerae. There are five species in the genus Guanchia, all
from the Canaries, and four occur in Tenerife. They are closely related to
the several brachypterous Forficula that live in the Mediterranean area (Cho-
pard, 1946). Therefore, the genus is interesting more because of its endemi-
city rather than because of any structural specializations. These insects live
exclusively in the woods, especially in laurel forests. They usually inhabit
cracks in the bark of trees and the hollows of trunks, but are also found in dry
leaf litter, especially that of Aeonitum. G. cabrerae is endemic to Gran Ca-
naria and Tenerife, and in the latter occurs in the north, where it seems to be
adult practically all year long.
Guanchia canariensis. This geophilous earwig is endemic to Tenerife.
It has a northern distribution, but extends inland as far as El Portillo. It ap-
pears to be adult during spring and summer.
Guanchia guancharia. This earwig is endemic to Gran Canaria and
Tenerife. In the latter it has aninland distribution in the central and east from
Aguamansa to El Bailadero.
Guanchia uxori. This geophilous earwig, endemic to Tenerife, has a
northern distribution similar to that of G. canariensis. -Adults are recorded
from the winter and spring months. |
Contribution No. 289
Department of Biology
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan 48202
U. S. A.
RESUME
Tenerife is the largest island of the Canarian Archipelago, a group of
volcanic islands off the coast of Morocco. It features a mild, uniform climate
and great relief, and supports the growth of diversified biotic communities,
both natural and disturbed. A comparatively rich assemblage of Orthopteroi-
dea finds its home there.
During the last fifty years many reports have been published dealing,
in part, with the Tenerifean orthopteroids, and this literature provides an in-
complete faunal list and scattered notes on habits and distribution. More re-
cently a dissertation appeared (Holzapfel, 1970) that treats the systematics and
distribution of the Canarian Acridoidea, but there is still neither an up-to-date
list of the entire Tenerifean fauna nor a detailed discussion of its biogeography.
The present study, involving analysis of biological data and study of specimens
from several collections, aims toward the partial elimination of that gap in the
literature.
The Tenerifean orthopteroid fauna now numbers 88 species, including
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 21
13 Blattoidea, 7 Mantoidea, 12 Tettigonoidea, 15 Grylloidea, 29 Acridoidea, and
12 Dermaptera belonging to 31 subfamilies and 58 genera. A total of 24 of the
species (27%)and6 of the genera (10%) are endemic to the islands, and the per-
centage of endemic species per group ranges from as high as 58% (Dermap-
tera) to as low as 13% (Grylloidea), and is positively correlated with aptery or
brachyptery, except in the Acridoidea.
The faunal affinities are mostly North African, but there are also many
general Mediterranean, Ethiopian, and cosmopolitan representatives among
the Tenerifean orthopteroids. A total of 30 of the species are Mediterranean
or Mediterranean-Palearctic in world distribution; 16 species Ethiopian, Med-
iterranean-Ethiopian, or Mediterranean and Afro-Asian; 14 species cosmopol-
itan or tropicopolitan; 4 species Holarctic; and the remaining species endemic.
A total of 15 of the genera prove to be Mediterranean or Mediterranean-Pale-
arctic; 2 genera Ethiopian; 4 genera Ethiopian-Palearctic; 19 genera cosmopol-
itan or tropicopolitan; ll genera globally widespread; and the remaining genera
endemic.
The orthopteroid distributions fall into 37 provisional patterns (explained
in Plates I-IV) that can be aggregated into seven major categories: ubiquitous,
southern, eastern,northern, eastern crescent, interior, and coastal. The
coastal pattern is expanded beyond the usual sense in that it also includes a low
stretch of land, the ''Laguna Belt, '' joining the northern and southern coasts at
a point between the Esperanza and Mercedes mountains. This area is essen-
tially an inland extension of coast, and many coastal species take advantage of
it to live there.
The orthopteroid distributions prove inconsistent with the elaborate bio-
geographic scheme postulated by Ceballos and Ortuno (1951) based primarily on
plant distributions. A better fit of the data is obtained by plotting the distribu-
tions against elevation as modified by exposure. On that basis the following
tentative faunal regions may be recognized: beach, sublittoral scrub, tropical
forest, central forest, and subalpine scrub.
The Tenerifean Orthopteroidea respond to the mild, subtropical Canar-
ian climate in the expected manner. They tend to be active all year long, and
either nymphs or adults may be taken at any time from within the preferred
habitats, except in the subalpine zones. Inthe latter, the inhabitants undergo
a diapause during the winter months, and do not appear as nymphs until spring
and as adults until summer.
RESUMEN
Tenerife es la isla mas extensa del Archipielago de Las Canarias, grupo de
islas volcanicas situado frente a las costas de Marruecos. Sus caracteristicas,
de gran relieve y Suave e uniforme clima,condicionan la formaciOn de diversas
comunidades bioticas naturales e introducidos. Comparativamente es ella
rica en representantes del orden Ortoptera.
Durante los ultimos cincuenta anos se han publicado diversos trabajos que
atafien,solo en parte,a los ortopteros tinerfenos que, en su conjunto, unicamen-
te proporcionan una lista incompleta de dicha fauna y dispersas notas sobre sus
habitats y distribuciones. Recientemente Holzapfel (1, 970) ha publicado un es-
tudio que trata de la sistematica y distribucion de los acrididos de las Canarias,
pero en el no aparece una lista actual de los de la fauna tinerfefia ni una discu-
sion detallada de su biogeografia; el presente estudio, que comprende el anali-
sis de datos biologicos y el estudio de gran numero de ejemplares de diversas
colecciones, aspira, dentro de los posible, a eliminar--aunque solo sea parci-
almente--las lagunas existentes.
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
La fauna de Ortopteroides de Tenerife consta hoy dia de 88 especies que in-
cluyen a 13 blatidos, 7 mantidos, 12 tetigonidos, 15 grilidos, 29 acrididos y 12
dermapteros, pertenecientes a 58 generos y 31 subfamilias. Un total de 24 espe-
cies (27%) y de 6 generos (10%) son endemicos de la isla, y el porcentaje de es-
pecies endemicas, por grupos, ofrece maximos del 58% (Dermaptera) y mini-
mos del 13% (Grylloidea), relacionados ellos con el apterismo o braquipterismo
excepto en los Acridoidea.
La afinidad de esta fauna es en su mayor parte con la norteafricana, pero
existen tambien en ella algunos representantes mediterraneos, etiopicos y cos-
mopolitas. Un total de 30 especies son mediterraneas ) mediterrhneas- ‘pale-
arcticas de distribucion mundial; 16 etiopicas, mediterraneas-etidpicas 0 me-
diterraneas y afro- asiaticas; 14 cosmopolitas 0 tropicales; 4 holarcticas y el res-
to especies endemicas. 15 de sus generos son mediterraneos 0 mediterraneos-
palearcticos; 2 etidpicos; 4 etidpicos- -palearcticos; 19 cosmopolitas 6 tropicales;
ll de dispersion mundial y el resto endemicos.
Con estos taxones se han hecho 37 grupos de tipo provisional (expuestos en
las laminas I a IV) y reunidos, en las siete siguientes categorias principales:
ubicuos, surenos, orientales, nortenos, orientales ascendentes, interiores y
costeros. El grupo costero comprende algo mas de lo que indica la acepcion
usual de ese termino ya, que incluye el una baja y larga faja de tierra (Paso de
La Laguna), que une las costas norte y sur por un paso situado entre los mon-
tes de La Esperanza y Las Mercedes; esta area por ser esencialmente una ex-
tension de la costa, es aprovechada por varias especies costeras para vivir en
ella.
La distribucion de estos Ortopteroides muestra la poca consistencia que pa-
ra ellos ofrece el esquema biogeografico aportado por Ceballos y Ortuno (1, 951)
basado, principalmente, en la distribucion de las plantas. Trazando su distri-
bucion ‘sobre un mapa que descanse sobre las zonas altitudinales afectadas por
la orientacion, se consigue un mejor aprovechamiento de los datos existentes
y con base en ello, intentamos poner de manifiesto las siguientes zonas faunis-
ticas: litoral, sublitoral, bosque tropical, bosque central y zona subalpina.
Los Ortopteroides de Tenerife responden, como era de esperar, a las ca-
racteristicas del suave y subtropical climadel archipielago canario. Suelen ser
ellos activos durante todo el ano, y tanto ninfas como adultos pueden colectarse
en cualquier epoca en sus habitats preferidos, excepto los de la zona subalpina.
En esta ultima, sufren una pausa durante los meses invernales y no aparecen
sus ninfas hasta la primavera y en verano los adultos.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The data reported herein were amassed during the tenure of the first au-
thor's grants from the American Philosophical Society and the Graduate Divi-
sionof Wayne State University. Insect specimens were loaned by Sr. Dn. R. Agen-
jo, Director, and Srta. Dna. Vicenta Llorente del Moral, Orthopterist, of the
Instituto Espanol de Entomologia, Madrid, and by Sr. Dn. Jose Maria Fernan-
dez, Chief, Laboratorio de Zoologia, Museo de Ciencias Naturales, SantaCruz.
Sres. Fernandez, above, and E. R. S. Sventenius, Jardin de Aclimatacion de
la Orotava, Puerto de la Cruz, assisted in certain plant determinations. Sres.
Manuel Garcia de Viedma e Hitos, Catedratico, Escuela Tecnica Superior de
Ingenieros de Montes, Madrid, Jose Miguel Gonzalez Hernandez, Chief, Pat-
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 23
rimonio Forestal del Estado, Santa Cruz, and Salvador Vazquez Duque, Las
Mimosas, Santa Cruz, gave advice and rendered various other professional
services essential to the project. Miss Leslie A. Gangwere assisted in col-
lecting specimens in the field. Irving J. Cantrall, Curator, Insect Division,
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and William L. Thompson, Professor,
and William Prychodko, Associate Professor, both of the Department of Biol-
ogy, Wayne State University, Detroit, read the manuscript and offered sugges-
tions of value in its improvement. Mrs. Betty Kuehn, also of the Department
of Biology, Wayne State University, typed the manuscript. To the above indi-
viduals and organizations the authors are indebted.
REFERENCES
Ceballos, L., and F. Ortuno.
1951. Estudio sobre la vegetacion y flora forestal de las Canarias Oc-
cidentales. Inst. For. Invest. Exper., Madrid. 465 pp.
Chopard, L.
1942. Insectes Orthopteroides recoltes dans les iles Atlantiques.
Comm. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn., 8: 13 pp.
1943. Orthopteroides de l'Afrique du Nord. Librairie Larose, Paris.
450 pp.
1946. Les Orthopteroides des iles Atlantides. Mem. Soc. Biogr.,
8: 199-208.
1954, Insectes Orthopteroides recoltes aux iles Canaries par M. H.
| Lindberg. Comm. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn., 14: 15 pp.
Escalera, F. M.
1922. Nota biologica sobre la Anataelia canariensis1. Bol. de Tener-
ife. Bol. R. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat., 22: 157-158.
Fernandez, J. M.
1966. La fauna entomologica Canaria y sus origenes. Publ. Mus. Ar-
queol. Cabildo Ins. Tenerife, 6: 61-68.
Gangwere, S. K.
In press. Feeding behavior in the orthopteroid insects of Tenerife, Ca-
nary Islands, Spain. Yearbook Amer. Phil. Soc. 1970.
Gardner, A. E.
1960. Odonata, Saltatoria and Dictyoptera collected by Mr. E. S. A.
Baynes in the Canary Islands, 1957 to 1959. Entomologist,
93: 128-131.
Holzapfel, C. M.
1970. Zoogeography of the Acridoidea in the Canary Islands. Univ.
Mich. doct. diss.: 213 pp.
In press. Evolution in the Canary Islands. III: Two new Arminda,
with notes on the Arminda brunneri complex on Tenerife. Occ.
Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich.
Jago, N. D.
1963. A revision of the genus Calliptamus Serville. Bull. Brit. Mus.
Nat. Hist., 13: 289-350.
Johnsen, P.
1970. Notes on African Acridoidea in Danish museums. Nat. Jutland.,
15: 123-162.
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
Lems, K.
1960. Floristic botany of the Canary Islands. Sarracenia, 5: 94 pp.
Uvarov, B. P. |
1926. Grasshoppers from Northern Nigeria. Trans. Ent. Soc. London,
1925: 413-453.
1948. Tettigoniidae and Acrididae collected in 1931 on the Atlantic Is -
lands by R. Frey and R. Stora. Comm. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn.,
8: 7 pp.
Willemse, C. :
1936. Une excursion orthopterologique auxilesCanaries. Nat. Maandbl.,
25: 40-42, 56-57, 72-73, 86-89, 101-103, 113-115.
1949, Addition to the knowledge of the Dermaptera and Orthoptera of the
Canary Islands. Tijdschr. voor Ent., 91: 7-ll.
1950. Second addition to the knowledge of the Dermaptera and Orthop-
tera of the Canary Islands. Tijdschr. voor Ent., 92: 248-250.
Willemse, C., andC. F. A. Bruijning.
1949. On a small collection of Orthoptera from the Canary Islands.
Tijdschr. voor Ent., 91: 23-24.
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution
TABLE I
Annotated Provisional List of Orthopteroidea of Tenerife, Canary Islands.
World Distribution
& Endemism
Groups & Species
BLATTOIDEA
Ectobiinae
Arbiblatia bivittata (Brulle) Yes:
Tenerife & G. Cana
ia
Pseudomopinae
Blattella germanica (L.) No:
Cosmopolitan
Loboptera canariensis (Chop. 9 Yes:
Tenerife
Loboptera decipiens (Germ. ) No:
Mediterranean
Loboptera fortunata Kr. Yes:
Tenerife & La Palma
Blattinae
Blatta orientalis L.° No:
Cosmopolitan
Periplaneta americana (L. ) No:
Cosmopolitan
Periplaneta australasiae (Fab. )5 | No:
Cosmopolitan
Periplaneta brunnea Burm.® No:
Cosmopolitan
Oxyhaloinae
Leucophaea maderae (Fab. ) No:
Cosmopolitan
Pycnoscelidinae
Pycnoscelis surinamensis (L. ) No:
Cosmopolitan
Tiviinae
Zetha vestita (Brulle) No:
Neotropical, Maca-
ronesian, Hawaiian
Tenerifean
Distribution?
125.6, 9.8, 16
26, 29, 43, 49,
53, 77, 78, 79,83,
92, lll, 114, 116,
7, 128
60, 37, 102, 116,
124
96, 102
3, 29, 60, 77,
14
7, 18, 49, 60, 116
60, 73
60, 73, 83, 87,
102
60, 102, 120
60
60, 73, 87, 102
14, 32, 43, 66,73,
83, 87, 202, 102,
104, 114, 117, 122
14, 60, 98, 106
Tenerifean
Distribution
Type®
IVa
Vb
vilt
Vie
IVd
Vili
VIlid
Vilt
Vilf
Vild
Vila
Vile
29
Adult
Seasonal
Periodism
All months ex-
cept VII & XII
I-IV, VII-VIIL,
XX
IV, VI-VII
All months ex-
cept I, VI, VII,
XII
x, wit
I, IV-V, VII-XI
i; Xx
VI
i Vil, 1X, x1
I-III, V-VI
All months ex-
cept IV, X
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
TABLE I, CONT.
| Tenerifean Adult
World Distribution Tenerifean Distribution Seasonal
Groups & Species & Endemism® Distribution? Type® Periodism9
Epilamprinae
Leurolestes ciycumvagans Burm. | No: B85, 102 Vili I, V, XI
Cosmopolitan
MANTOIDEA
Amelinae
Ameles gracilis (Brulle) No: D,) 2d,aOn Od VIb VI-VII, IX-X_
Mediterranean .
Ameles limbata Brulle No: (12; TA 204/36) Ic IV-VI, IX-XI
Mediterranean D1, 64, 73, 93,117,
128
Pseudoyersinia subaptera Chop. Yes: 22, 35, 43, 46,66, VIith I, II-VI, XI
(=P. lindbergi Chop. ) Tenerife & Lanzarote {79, 81, 117
Pseudoyersinia teydeana Chop. Yes: 18 Vig III, VI, VIII
Tenerife
Mantinae
Mantis religiosa (L.) No: 3, 5, 60, 89, 91, Ve VI-XI
Palearctic & Nearctic|1l4, 124
Empusinae
Blepharopsis mendica (Fab. ) No: 55343505, 13,88, VIIb III-IV, VI, VIII-X
Mediterranean 102, 122, 124
Hypsicorypha gracilis (Burm. ) No: 7, 14, 48, 60, 66, Vb II-VIII
N. African 73, 83, 100, 102,
103, lll, 123
TETTIGONOIDEA
Phaneropterinae
Phaneroptera nana sparsa Stal No: do, 9, 14, 18, 22, Ia All months ex-
Mediterranean & 43, 49, 51, 55,58, cept X
Ethiopian 09, 60, 87, 88,
100; 102,277, 7
Meconeminae
Canariola nubigena (Kr. ) Yes: Dy t,t, OT GT, IIIb II-IV, VI
Tenerife 7
Canariola willemsei Mor. Yes: 5, ll4 | Vid IX, XI
Tenerife & Gomera
Tettigoniinae
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 27
TABLE I, CONT.
Tenerifean Adult
World Distribution Tenerifean Distribution Seasonal
Groups & Species & Endemism Distribution Type Periodism
Calliphona k&nigi Kr. Yes: By By Dy ey eG; IVec IV-IX, XII
Tenerife 39, 46, 60, 72,
83, 94, lll, 116,
119
Decticinae
Ariagona margaritae Kr. Yes: Le a 7, 13, IVe VII-XI
Tenerife, Hierro, & | 29, 57, 63, 65,
Gomera Tt, 209, Tb 415
? Platycleis denticulata Panz. No: ---- ---- ----
W. Mediterranean
Platycleis falx (Fab. ) No: ---- ---- ----
Mediterranean
Platycleis grisea (Fab. ) No: 26, 114 Vif VI, IX
Palearctic
Platycleis intermedia (Serv. ) No: 14, 23, 67 VIIf IV-V, VII
Palearctic (especially
Mediterranean)
Platycleis sabulosa Azam No: o,. 7, 14; 23, 25, IVc II-VI, [X-X
W. Mediterranean 49, 60, 69, 77,
Bo, 87, M0> ¢24;
117
Tessellana tessellata (Charp. ) No: BG 80. Ore 77. Illa IlI-V, VII-IX, XI
Mediterranean & Cal-| 83, 91, 96, 724,
ifornian 117
Decticus albifrons (Fab.) No: Duty 20500, 266, Illa IlI-IX, XI
Mediterranean 87, 110, “U2, 17
GRY LLOIDEA
Gryllinae
Gryllus bimaculatus De G. No: 5, 8, 14, 26, 28, IVb All months
Afro-Asian & Medi- 43, 51, 60, 64,
terranean 6G, 69, 70" 77,
83.87, 89, LOL,
102, 111, 114, 116,
125
Acheta meridionalis (Uv. ) No: 14, 24, 27, 37, IIIc All months ex-
(=A. canariensis Chop.) Mediterranean 43, 60, 94, 102, cept VI-VIII
114, 7, 122
Acheta hispanicus (Ramb. ) No: 5, 7, 14, 43, 60, IIc IlI-V, VII-XII
Mediterranean 73, 114
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
TABLE I, CONT.
Tenerifean Adult
World Distribution Tenerifean Distribution Seasonal
Groups & Species & Endemism 6 Distribution? Type8 Periodism9
pe a ie doa burdigalensis No: 73 Vij VII
(Latr. ) Mediterranean
Modicogryllus guanchicus (Kr. ) No: 7, 14, 24, 60, 90, IVd II, IV-VI, VIII,
Spanish Sahara 114, 117, 118 ».4
Modicogryllus palmetorum (Kr.) | No: 17, 118 VI II, IV-V, IX
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
Platygryllus brunneri (Sauss. ) No: Ba Ot, 0k, Ti; VIIh I, I-IV, VII, IX
Almost tropicopolitan}118
Gryllomorpha canariensis Chop. | Yes: 3,. 18, 26, 27, (28, via I, VI, IX-XI
Tenerife 45, 52, 64, 67,
lll, 116, 117
Gryllomorpha longicauda {(Ramb. ) | No: ---- ---- ----
Mediterranean (Iber-
ian & N. African)
Gryllodes sigillatus (W.) . No: 26, 102 IlId VI, XI-XII
Tropicopolitan
Mogoplistinae
Mogoplistes squamiger (Fisch.) | No: 102 VII1 I-II, IX
Mediterranean &
Madeiran
Cycloptiloides canariensis (Bol..) | Yes: 60, 69, 102 Vile I, XII
Tenerife
Trigonidiinae
Trigonidium cicindeloides (Ramb.)| No: 60, 87, 109 Vile H,- Vi, &
Afro-Asian & Medi-
terranean
Oecanthinae
Oecanthus pellucens (Scop. ) No: Ds. Once alan GO, IVe II, V, VII-XI
Palearctic, especial-|64, 83, 87, 205,
ly Mediterranean 124, 128
Gryllotalpinae
Gryllotalpa africana (Beauv. ) No: 5a,.°735:-93 VIli IV, VI, X
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
Groups & Species
ACRIDOIDEA
Tetriginae
Tetrix subulata (L. )
Paratettix meridionalis (Ramb. )
Pyrgomorphinae
? Pyrgomorpha cognata Kr.
Catantopinae
Arminda brunneri Kr.(=A. appen-
hageni End.)(= A. striatifrons
End. )
? Arminda burri Uv.
Calliptaminae
Calliptamus plebeius (Walk. )
Cyrtacanthacridinae
Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.’)
Oedipodinae
TABLE I, CONT.
World Distribution
& Endemism®
No:
Holarctic
No:
Mediterranean
No:
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
Yes:
Tenerife
Yes:
Tenerife & G. Cana-
ria
Yes:
Tenerife, G. Cana-
ria, La Palma, Hier-
ro, & Gomera
No:
Afro-Asian & Medi-
terranean
Tenerifean
Distribution?
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution
5, 43, 47, 53, Ib
60,
114,
128
69
2, 5, 7, 26, 27,
38,
77,
96,
116,
127
73, 87, LOL,
117, 118, 224,
Vilg
IVa
46, 49, 64,
85, 87, 93,
lll, 114, 115,
117, 126, 128
5, 7, 14, 15, 26, la
18, 19, 22, 23,
30, 40, 43,
46, 49, 53,
60, 62, 65,
73, 80, 82,
85, 86, 87, 88,
93, 94, 110,
115, 117, 124,
4, 31, 60, 69, Ve
73,
83, 102
Tenerifean
Distribution
Type 8
29
Adult
Seasonal
Periodism9
I, II-V, VIII,
X-XII
II
All months
I, VI-VIII, X
I-Il, IX-XI
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
TABLE I, CONT.
Tenerifean Adult
World Distribution Tenerifean Distribution Seasonal
Groups & Species & Endemism® Distribution Type Periodism
Scintharista n. notabilis (Walk.) | No: 9, 19, 42, 43, IIb All months
Mediterranean & 53, 54; 55, 73,
S. Asian 93, 94, 102, 110,
Lt, 128
Oedaleus decorus (Germ. ) No: 3, 45°°5,--29,- 60, Vid IV, VI-VIII, X-XI
Mediterranean & 65, 91
Ethiopian
Locusta migratoria (L. ) No: 3. 53) 14. 19. 23, Ve All months
Afro-Asian & Medi- 28, 37, 39, 43,
terranean 46,60, 69, 73,
Ui 19s 87s SS,
91, 93, 94, 102,
105, W445 115; 157
Oedipoda caerulescens (L. ) No: 2, 56,928 IIb ----
Mediterranean
Oedipoda canariensis Kr. Yes: 1, 19, 22, 46, 60, IIb All months ex-
Tenerife, G. Canar- | 64, 73, 79, 82, cept II-III, VII
ia, La Palma, Go- 03,-°94,°202, 117
mera,& Azores
? Oedipoda fuscocincta Luc. No: ---- ---- ----
N. African
Sphingonotus caerulans (L. ) No: 71 ---- ----
Palearctic
Sphingonotus canariensis (Sauss.) |No: 22 VIIk IV
Mediterranean (N.
African)
? Sphingonotus lucasii Sauss. No: ---- ---- ----
Mediterranean (N.
African)
Sphingonotus rubescens (Walk.) _|No: R, lds 1: 28597. Ib All months ex-
Afro-Asian, Mediter-| 32, 35, 43, 51,54, cept VII
ranean, & Madeiran 6G,09,- Ta, (9,
- 7-87, 88, 94, 102,
108, 110, lll, 117,
128
Sphingonotus savignyi Sauss. —_ |No: 31, 44, 78, 74, Vili I, II-IV, VI-IX,
Mediterranean 117 XI
Sphingonotus willemsei Mists. Yes: 18 vig VIT-IX
(=S. teydez) Tenerife
? Wernerella aspera (Brulle) No: ---- ---- <=
Mediterranean
Groups & Species
Wernerella picteti (Kr.)
Acrotylus i. insubricus (Scop. )
Acrotylus longipes Charp.
Acrotylus patruelis (H.-S. )
Aiolopus strepens (Latr. )
Atolopus thalassinus (Fab. )
Gomphocerinae
Stenohippus epacromioides
Krauss (=S. bonnet)
Dociostaurus maroccanus (Thunb.
Truxalinae
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution
TABLE I, CONT.
World Distribution
& Endemism
Yes:
Tenerife & Gomera
No:
Mediterranean
No:
Mediterranean
No:
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
No:
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
No:
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
No:
Ethiopian & Cape
Verdean
No:
Mediterranean
Tenerifean
Tenerifean Distribution
Distribution? Type’
19, 32) 2a 27 IIb
43, 46, 55, 70,
73
th, Woe BU Res, Vila
54, 55,66, 69,
87, 88, 98, 102,
LHL Sap ies
43, 73, 75, 128 IIc
S, 7,-44, 519, 23, Ib
26, 28, 29, 37,
43, 51, 60, 64,
69, 73, 77, 83,
87, 88, 93, 94,
99, 100, 102, 205,
107, 110, 114, 117,
128
2: 3. Be 7 ai AS, IVa
16, 18, 28, 27,
28, 43, 46, 51,
55, 60, 64, 69,
U1, 88, 87, 88,
93, 94, 99, 202,
102, 205, 111, 114,
116, 117, 228
%, 22, 23, 29.32, Ib
37, 43, 49,51,
55, 60, 69, 77,
83, 87, 88, 90,
91, 93, 94, 99,
102, 109, 110,222,
114, 116, 117, 120,
124
19, 34, 66, 73, VIIh
76, 98, 94, 95,
102, 117
5, 23, 26, 29, IVb
46, 53, 60, 65,
70, 77, 87, 88,
93, 110, 114, 117
31
Adult
Seasonal
Periodism
I, II-VI, VII-x,
XII
I, I-IV, VI-VIIL,
XI-XII
[) TSE; VI;
VIll-X, XII
All months
All months
All months
Ali months ex-
cept II, VII
IlI-IX, XII
32
TABLE I, CONT.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
Groups & Species
? Truxalis nasuta (L.)
PROTODERMAPTERA
Anataelia canariensis Bol.
DERMAPTERA
Labiduridae
Labidura riparia (Pall. )
Euborellia annulipes (Luc. )
Anisolabis maritima (Gene)
Anisolabis maxima (Brulle)
Labiidae
Labia minor (L. )
Forficulidae
Perirrhytus edentulus (Woll. )
Forficula auricularia L.
World Distribution
& Endemism
No:
Mediterranean &
Ethiopian
Yes:
Tenerife & Gomera
No:
Cosmopolitan
No:
Cosmopolitan
No:
Cosmopolitan
Yes:
Tenerife, G. Canar-
ia, Hierro, & Gomera
No:
Cosmopolitan
Yes:
Tenerife, G. Canar-
ia, Gomera, & Ma-
deira
No:
Holarctic
Tenerifean
Distribution’
69
14, 41, 87, 125
31, 73, 84
3, 5.9, a4.
23, 26, 29, 50,
53, 60, 64, 69,
73, 77, 83, 84,
87, 101, 102,109,
114, 16, 117
bi $8y 203,
73, 77, 84, 93,
102, 113, 116
s. 8. 7, 8
14, 15, 18, 26,
28, 60, 65, 77,
102, 207, 109,
ll, 114, 15, 16,
17
14, 60, 87, 88,
115
5, 33, 60, 115
a5 Aa,
26, 28, 48, 49,
50, 60, 73, 77,
102, 105,207, 122
113, 114
Tenerifean
Distribution
Type
Vilg
Vilg
VIlj
IVa
Vile
Adult
Seasonal
Periodism
II
All months
I, II-VI, VIII-IX,
XII
All months ex-
cept VII
Wi<V, DEX, Ri
All months
| II, VI, XI-XII
I, II-VI, VIII
All months ex-
cept VII-VII
Groups & Species
Guanchia cabrerae (Bol. )
Guanchia canariensis Burr
Guanchia guancharia (Hell. )®
Guanchia uxori (Hell. )
5
Species whose distribution, as shown here, is open to question, being based on 10 or fewer specimens.
6
If yes, the species is endemic, and the Canarian islands where it occurs are indicated; if no, it is not
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution
TABLE I, CONT.
World Distribution
& Endemism
Yes:
Tenerife & G. Canar-
ia
Yes:
Tenerife
Yes:
Tenerife & G. Canar-
ia
Yes:
Tenerife
Tenerifean
Tenerifean Distribution
Distribution” Type®
2,7, 13, 14, 20, IVd
28, 33, lll, 115,
116
2, 7, 77, 85, 92, Via
ll, 15, 16
5, 18, 26, 77, Vic
117
oS & € 12, Via
26, 65, 68, 85,
92, lll, 15
a Canarian or Macaronesian endemic, and its world distribution is noted.
7
The distributional records here given are based on the collections of M. Morales Martin, those of the
Laboratorio de Zoologia of the Museo Insular de Ciencias Naturales, Santa Cruz, and those of the Instituto Es-
pafiolde Entomologia, Madrid, except for the italicized records, which are from literature cited. The numer-
ical code to distribution appears on pp. 4-5.
8
33
Adult
Seasonal
Periodism
All months ex-
cept VII-VIII,
XI-XII
III-VII
II, V-VII, X
I-VI
The explanation of distributional types here used is given on pp. 7-8 and in Plates I-IV.
°The months in question are given in Roman numerals from I (January) through XII (December).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
34
1seO0
9¢ 968 “Z 9 “PG © uit 6 “GCE 97 ULBSB9Y NOG ZNIf) BUS
1g ple ‘€ G°LT L*§ 8 6r9 LOS °2 [erzUID BueZ]
(..J19@ Bunse’T,,)
eo DLE G c 6L 8 TI O°LLL 1v9 [etyu9o SCY sospoy so'y
(.W19@ eunse’yT,,)
v9 912 ‘Z I “TZ €°CI vV “89S LYG Teruo. {Sey eunseyT eT
IIT SoS 6 “GC VOT 0907 OOT }SBO9 ULOYILON BABIOIO BT
rea xX /sheq ung Jo | (°Do UT) (*Do UT) ( °ULUL UT) (° Ur UT)
JSVIIOAQ “SUH [enuuy ‘“dwiady, "dura, [[eyurey UOTICVASTY UOTS9Y AVID
“AV TRIOL “AVIeIOL ‘“Sny ‘Ay ‘qeq ‘Ay yenuuy ‘ay
“(IG61) OUNZIOQ pue SOTTeQaD pue ‘(qggT) BULdSY] Op [eUOTOEN S¥TIV
‘(8961 ‘9 “IOA) Sp1od9y AaYyyVOM P[LIOM J9IFV ‘SOTIITVIOT UvasIIOUaT, poyoEeTEeg Jo Vyeq [BVITSOTO109}0/
Il Hla VL
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 5)
SEP OC<HIOCNSHSO
Se enan
“8
~
>4e
WA
ole |
— Mee let of
autine a, UE P2OS
Ne EE
BPX ISe. _~«m
wr, Gel OCR CHS SMD
Hefee
PLATE I. Orthopteroid distributions in Tenerife, as recognized in this re-
port: Distribution Types I-III. ?
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
36
Orthopteroid distributions in Tenerife, as recognized in this re-
port: Distribution Types IV-V.
PLATE II.
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 37
| i
aca Sorte
PA
OTT ee ie
sRUBRRTERO REMY,
Oe
PLATE III. Orthopteroid distributions in Tenerife, as recognized in this re-
port: Distribution Types VI-VII.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
38
VII F
PLATE IV. Orthopteroid distributions in Tenerife, as recognized in this re-
port: Distribution Types VII, Continued.
Tenerifean Orthopteroid Distribution 39
TACORONTE
LA OROTAVA
PUERTO DE LA CRUZ
LA LAGUNA
“CANDELARIA
GUIMAR
IZANA
PUERTO DE SAN JUAN
LOS CRISTIANOS VILAF LOR
COASTAL SCRUB
ites > Bes) SABINAR
LAURISILVA & FAYAL-BREZAL
PINAR
ESCOBONAL
RETAMA - CODESO
VIOLETA
PLATE V. A. Elevational zones and selected localities of Tenerife. The
encircled dots indicate places listed in Table II. B. Phytogeo-
graphic regions of Tenerife, after Ceballos and Ortuno (1951).
40
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, 1972
PUNTA HIDALGO
AFUR
TAGANANA
TACORONTE | BAJAMAR \ TA LAGUNA ay,
a a ,
PUERTO DE LA CRUZ TEJINA r 3 8
7
SAUZAL . 20 77
. 54-—-”—~ IcuESTE
SANTA URSULA 78/ 57 IL
39 . SAN A
SAN JUAN DE LA RAMBLA “tg 91 |? a 58 79 (ie ae sci
A #99 39 30 e SANTA CRUZ
REALEJO a ee LA CUESTA
BUENAVISTA Si ik ata cas a 106 id fe
Boros 64-63
TENO y | BARRANCO GRANDE
‘ 89 e ° 59
_)—_77] 72 SAN DIEGO
« ov s
2 ” 33 497 . LA ESPERANZA
15 45 46 BARRANCO Hi
70 at 40 fe eee
3d 36 CANDELARIA
52 25
107 jee ARAFO
LOS GIGANTES ———/” 18 GUIMAR
e
‘ 80
38 AGUAMANSA
CHIO
-%
PUERTO DE SAN JUAN
PLATE VI.
36 ARICO VIEJO
55
e Ag
—\
‘i ee
LOS CRISTIANOS EL MEDANO 4
wie
|
PORIS DE ABONA
ADEJE
LAS GALLETAS
LA CUESTA
A. Collection localities of Tenerife, as cited in this report. The
location of settlements is indicated by dots, and the name of each
is written out, while the approximate location of other places is
indicated by number. For a code to all locality numbers see
pp. 4-5. The insert below (B) represents a magnified portion
of coast in the Santa Cruz area.
ht
FA 3
ee
f 5 yi
inte
i 4
+
+
*
Dee RT
As a eS
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 8, Number 2, 1972
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
XXVII. The varipalpus group of Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
By J. Hal Arnell and Lewis T. Nielsen
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
XXVIl
THE VARIPALPUS GROUP OF AEDES (OCHLEROTATUS)*
By
J. Hal Arnell? and Lewis T. Nielsen®
The Varipalpus Group of Aedes consists of 5 species of treehole-breeding mos-
quitoes with a distribution through much of western North America west of the
Continental Divide. Coquillett (1902:292-293) described Culex varipalpus from a
single female collected at Williams, Arizona. Ludlow (1905:231-232) described
Taeniorhynchus sierrensis from material sent from Three Rivers, Tulare Co., Cal-
ifornia, and subsequently (1906:132) reduced it to synonomy with varipalpus.
The ‘“‘western treehole mosquito” of Arizona and the Pacific Coast was consid-
ered to be Aedes varipalpus until 1956 when Belkin and McDonald (1956:344)
resurrected sierrensis for the populations from the Pacific Coast States and sub-
sequently described (1957:179-191) monticola from southern Arizona. A fourth
species in the Varipalpus Group, deserticola, was described by Zavortink (1970: 1-
7) from the desert of southern California.
Despite the widespread distribution of the Varipalpus Group and the consid-
erable economic importance of sierrensis, a major pest species in localized areas
of California, the group has never been the object of a thorough taxonomic study.
The biology of sierrensis from California has received considerable attention but
the distribution and systematics of the group are poorly known.
We are indebted to John N. Belkin for guidance and encouragement during the
study and preparation of the manuscript; to Thomas J. Zavortink for invaluable
assistance in securing specimens from southern California and Arizona, the pre-
liminary work on deserticola and for advice and suggestions freely given during
many hours of discussion of the study; to Jay H. Linam, Robert J. Novak and
Steven Romney for assistance and companionship in the collecting of specimens;
to William A. Powder and Sandra J. Heinemann for assistance in preparing mater-
ial for study; to Margaret Kowalczyk and Nobuko Kitamura for preparation of
preliminary drawings and inking the final plates; and to Caryle Stallard for the
typing of preliminary drafts, editorial assistance and preparation of the text copy
‘Contribution from project “Mosquitoes of Middle America” supported by U.S. Public Health
Service Research Grant AI-04379 and U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-2478. Based on PhD dissertation submitted by J. Hal Arnell
to the University of Utah and revised by him during tenure of postdoctoral traineeship at the
University of California, Los Angeles (U.S. Public Health Service Training Grant 5-T01-AI-00070).
* Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024. |
* Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
for lithoprinting. We are also indebted to the U.S. National Museum and the British
Museum (Natural History) for the loan of specimens examined during this study:
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MATERIAL. The material for this study came primarily from collections made
by the authors from April 1965 to October 1970 and material collected for the
project “Mosquitoes of Middle America” (Belkin, Schick, et al., 1965) deposited
at the University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA]. Material from the U.S.
National Museum [USNM] and specimens of the Aedes pulchritarsis group from
the British Museum (Natural History) were also examined. The material collected
by the authors will be deposited at the University of Utah [UTAH] and UCLA.
Several collectors are identified in the distribution lists by initials only. These are
Thomas J. Zavortink (TJZ), Robert J. Novak (RN), Dennis W. Heinemann (DWH),
J.H. Linam (JHL), L.T. Nielsen (LTN) and J.H. Arnell (HA). A total of 15,776
specimens of all species was examined, 2,687 males, 2,548 females, 3,215 pupae
and 7,326 larvae. Of this material, 1,172 were individual rearings (946 larval, 182
pupal, 44 incomplete). Material was collected and prepared for study primarily
following the techniques outlined by Belkin (1962) and Breland (1957).
TAXONOMIC PROCEDURE. Methods used in this study were primarily those
of classical comparative morphology. The material was examined in detail in all
stages and compared with topotypic material of previously described species to
determine its taxonomic position. Group and species descriptions in general fol-
low the method of presentation of Belkin (1962). Terminology for the descrip-
tion of the mesonotal scale patterns is after Berlin (1969). Usually at least 10
adults of each sex from each collection were examined in complete detail with
the remainder examined in pertinent details only. The complete chaetotaxy of
5 to 10 larval and pupal skins from each collection was examined when material
was available and the remainder examined in pertinent details only. All stages of
each species are illustrated. The larval and pupal chaetotaxy figured represents
the modal condition of at least 10 topotypic specimens, as do the illustrations
of the male genitalia. Details of the adults of varipalpus are illustrated as repre-
sentative of the entire group,. with only the mesonota of the remaining species
illustrated.
SYSTEMATICS
TAXONOMY. The Varipalpus Group can be distinguished from all other New
World Aedes as adults by the white scale patches on the palpus and apical white
rings on the tarsal segments. The larvae are characterized by a poorly-developed
ventral brush composed of 6 pairs of hairs with each hair usually double and be-
coming stronger distally.
The 5 species of the Varipalpus Group can be divided into 2 subgroups on
the basis of morphology, 1 represented by laguna, monticola, varipalpus and des-
erticola, the other by sierrensis, the differences between the 2 subgroups being
most evident in the male and larva. In the male, laguna, monticola, varipalpus
and deserticola are characterized by a ventral white streak on the basal 0.5 of
the proboscis, which sierrensis lacks, and the genitalia are simple with relatively
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 3
minor variations among the species in the basal tergomesal lobe of the sidepiece
and the lobes of the ninth tergite. The male genitalia of sierrensis have a rela-
tively short, broad sidepiece, the basal tergomesal lobe with a dense cluster
of strongly developed setae rather than a single seta, short strong hairs on the
tergomesal margin of the sidepiece, a relatively short clasper, and a relatively short
claspette. In the larva, laguna, monticola, varipalpus and deserticola differ from
each other primarily in rather slight variations in chaetotaxy and siphon length,
while sierrensis differs from these in gray instead of white coloration, weaker ab-
dominal hairs | and 13, more numerous comb scales, and a relatively long and
cylindrical rather than short and conical siphon. However, sierrensis and deserti-
cola both have larval hair 12-I present while it is absent in laguna, monticola and
varipalpus. In adult ornamentation, other than previously discussed, deserticola
and sierrensis show similarities, primarily in the reduced number of pleural setae
and smaller pleural scale patches, while laguna, monticola and varipalpus are alike
in having more pleural setae and more extensive pleural scale patches.
DISTRIBUTION. The Varipalpus Group is known only from western North
America from British Columbia near the southern border of Alaska to the Cape
Region of Baja California. The species with the most widespread distribution, sier-
rensis, extends from southern California and probably northern Baja California
through the Pacific drainage of California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana
and British Columbia and the margins of the interior basins of California, Nevada
and Utah. The remaining 4 species are represented by relict populations, laguna
in the mountains of the Cape Region of Baja California, monticola in southern
Arizona, varipalpus in northern Arizona and western Utah and deserticola in the
western margins of the Mohave and Colorado Deserts of southern California. All
species in the group are allopatric with the exception of deserticola and sierrensis
which occur together on the desert margins of the Transverse and Peninsular Ranges
of southern California.
AFFINITIES. The relationships of the Varipalpus Group to other mosquito
groups are obscure. It has been variously placed in several Aedes subgenera and
there is now considerable difference of opinion as to whether the group should
be placed in Finlaya or Ochlerotatus. Ludlow (1906:132) suggested that sierrensis
was probably a Finlaya and Dyar (1918:79, 1922:86) placed sierrensis (as vari-
palpus) in the subgenus Jaeniorhynchus on the basis of male genitalic characters
and Edwards (1932:154) placed varipalpus in group G of Finlaya, also on the
basis of male genitalia. Knight and Marks (1952:517) in their review of Finlaya
removed the Varipalpus Group from Finlaya and did not assign it to any other
subgenus, but Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:257) and Pratt (1956:10) placed it
in Finlaya. Belkin and McDonald (1957:190) removed the group from Finlaya
and placed it in Ochlerotatus ‘‘pending a much needed revision of this complex
subgenus and its various derivatives.”’ Rohlf (1963:802) in his numerical taxo-
nomic study of Aedes considered sierrensis to be a Finlaya as did Trebatoski
and Haynes (1969: 332) on the basis of enzyme comparisons, although the latter
included no species of Ochlerotatus in their study. Lunt and Nielsen (1971:110),
comparing adult thoracic setal characters, placed the Varipalpus Group in Group
X (Pulchritarsis-varipalpus Group) of Ochlerotatus and found no justification for
its placement in Finlaya. In his comparison of larval mouthparts, Gardner (1971:
80) suggested that the mandibles of the Varipalpus Group are ‘‘Finlayan” in form
and the maxillae closely resemble Aedes (Finlaya) togoi (Theobald, 1907), although
he did not actually place the group in Finlaya. It is our opinion that the Vari-
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
palpus Group fits in better in Ochlerotatus, as that complex subgenus is now de-
fined, than it does in Finlaya. It seems to show closer relationships to the Old
World Aedes (Ochlerotatus) pulchritarsis (Rondani, 1872) and related species than
to any other group (see discussion below). We feel, therefore, that it should be
retained in Ochlerotatus pending additional information on its affinities to other
groups.
Examination of other New World forms casts little light on the affinities of
the Varipalpus Group. A possible relationship between the Varipalpus Group and
Aedes muelleri Dyar, 1920 has been proposed, but the similarities are possibly
due to convergence. The male genitalia of muelleri are similar to those of laguna,
monticola and deserticola and although there are similarities between the larvae
and pupae of muelleri and those of the Varipalpus Group, some significant dif-
ferences are also present, such as the number and shape of the comb scales and
the development of the ventral brush. With the above mentioned exception of
the male genitalia, the adults of muelleri are unlike the Varipalpus Group, dif-
fering conspicuously in ornamentation, proboscis and leg length, female genitalia
and female tarsal claws. |
Belkin, Heinemann and Page (1970:143) briefly discuss a single male Aedes in
the USNM collection from Jamaica, probably an undescribed species. The printed
label reads //Jamaica BWI/Jan 1946/GA Thompson//. The abdomen of this spec-
imen is missing and there is apparently no genitalia slide extant. They place it
tentatively in the subgenus Ochlerotatus. The specimen shows some resemblance
to the Varipalpus Group in (1) decumbent scales of head curved, pointed, white
on vertex, dark laterally; (2) palpus with white over joints between segments 3
and 4 and 4 and 5 and few bristles on segments 3-5, but the palpus is consider-
ably shortened (0.69 of proboscis length instead of equal to proboscis); (3) meso-
notum with well-developed bristles and entirely covered with narrow, curved scales,
pale golden on dark brown background; (4) pleuron with patches of broad, white
appressed or semierect scales; (5) legs dark with pale scales forming ventral stripes
and basal and apical rings on femora, tibiae with basal and/or apical white scales
. (hindtibia missing) and tarsi with white scales basally and apically on segments
1 and 2; and (5) wing dark scaled. Since the genitalia are missing, it is impossible
to accurately place this specimen, but it may be allied to the Varipalpus Group.
There are several other treehole-breeding mosquitoes on the Island of Jamaica that
show relationships with the mosquito fauna of western North America. Haema-
gogus equinus Theobald, 1903 is found both in Jamaica and throughout Central
America as far north as northern Sinaloa in Mexico. Orthopodomyia waverleyi
(Grabham, 1907) of Jamaica is closely allied to O. signifera (Coquillett, 1896),
which is sympatric with the Varipalpus Group in Arizona and California. Coreth-
rella appendiculata Grabham, 1906 of Jamaica is found in western Mexico and the
U.S.A., as well as Central America and the Antilles south to Argentina. These
species may indicate a possible migratory pathway between Jamaica and Central
America at some time in the past which would account for a species allied to
the Varipalpus Group being present on Jamaica, although the evidence is very
tenuous and there are no other treehole Aedes or treehole Anopheles that show
this distribution pattern.
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) pulchritarsis (Rondani, 1872) and related species of the
Old World show many similarities to and may be the Old World representative
of the Varipalpus Group. Members of the pulchritarsis complex breed in tree-
holes and are found throughout the Mediterranean area, in central Asia and north-
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 5
ern India and Pakistan. The male genitalia of pulchritarsis from Italy are very
much like those of varipalpus (sens. str.) with the exception of a poorly-developed
subapical lobe and variation in the distribution of setae on the dorsal surface of
the sidepiece. The male palpus is slightly longer than in the Varipalpus Group
and the terminal segments are more densely bristled. The species of this com-
plex diverge somewhat from the Varipalpus Group in details of mesonotal and
tarsal ornamentation, but otherwise the adults are similar. The larvae of the pul-
chritarsis complex have well-developed head hairs 5 and 6, longer antennae, comb
scales characterized by a long median spine, often an extremely long siphon and
5 pairs of hairs in the ventral brush. A thorough study of the chaetotaxy of the
immature stages of the pulchritarsis complex has never been undertaken. Since
the complex overall is so poorly known it is difficult to determine its affinities
but the many resemblances to the Varipalpus Group are suggestive of phyloge-
netic relationship.
SPECIATION AND PHYLOGENY. Based on the distribution patterns, rather
simple male genitalia and undoubtedly tropical origin, the Varipalpus Group ap-
pears to be an ancient one. It presents a mosaic of characters considering all stages
and consequently its phylogeny is difficult to sort out. Aedes laguna is prob-
ably closest to the ancestral stock. It has the most southerly distribution, the
male genitalia are the simplest with the undifferentiated seta of the basal lobe
more poorly developed and the larva is among the least specialized in the group.
The mesonotal ornamentation of 3 narrow lines of golden scales on the anterior
mesonotum is probably the primitive condition since this character is constant
in laguna and a tendency towards a reduction in golden scales is evident in the
remaining species of the group, all of which typically have a broad patch of gold-
en scales on the anterior mesonotum. Recent geological evidence (Anderson, 1971:
61) indicates that Baja California may have been connected to mainland Mexico
south and east of its present location as recently as 4-6 million years ago. Addi-
tional evidence for a relatively recent connection comes from biogeographical stud-
ies, a good example of which is in the distribution of Deinocerites mcdonaldi
Belkin & Hogue, 1959 found only on the Cape Region of Baja California and
mainland Mexico east and south of the Peninsula (Adames, 1971:81). If this is
the case, it would explain the existence of an isolated population of laguna on
Baja California. Proposals of migration southward along the Peninsula or disper-
sion westward to the Peninsula from the mainland across more than 100 miles
of open sea are untenable, and an alternate hypothesis of laguna being the relict
remnants of a more extensive population inhabiting a larger area of present-day
western Mexico can be proposed. Additional populations of laguna or a laguna-
like fauna might be expected in the higher elevations of the Sierra Madre Occi-
dental and western extremes of the Sierra Madre del Sur. Other species of tree-
hole mosquitoes have been taken in this area but it has not been sampled thoroughly.
Aedes monticola shows the closest affinity to laguna. The adult ornamentation
is similar except for the above-mentioned anterior mesonotal golden scales which
form a dense, broad patch in monticola. The male genitalia differ only in the
relative stoutness of the differentiated seta of the basal tergomesal lobe.
A light modification of the basal tergomesal lobe of the sidepiece of the male
genitalia of varipalpus indicates a more derived condition for this species. A char-
acteristic feature of varipalpus adults is a cluster of subspiracular setae. These setae
are also found in Jaguna although they are fewer in number and not always present.
Although the male genitalia of deserticola differ from laguna only in the rela-
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
tive stoutness of the differentiated seta of the basal tergomesal lobe and a ten-
dency toward fewer spines on the lobes on the ninth tergite, the larva and the
adult ornamentation differ to a greater extent. The larva of deserticola has hair
12-I developed and the setae and scales on the adult pleuron are much reduced
from the condition in laguna, monticola and varipalpus, indicating considerable
divergence from the more primitive members of the group. On the basis of the
male genitalia, deserticola was probably derived from laguna-monticola stock.
On the basis of its widespread distribution and relative abundance, as well as
apparently derived morphological characters, sierrensis would appear to be the
most modern and dominant species in the Varipalpus Group and probably diverged
from the remaining species comparatively recently. It exhibits the greatest amount
of intraspecific variation in the group. Based on very tenuous evidence of sim-
ilarities in adult ornamentation and the presence of hair 12-I in the larva and
present distribution patterns, it is possible that sierrensis is most closely allied to
deserticola. |
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
FEMALES. Small to medium-sized species; integument brown to black; dark
scales with slight iridescence; white markings on head, thorax, abdomen and legs,
and white and golden markings on mesonotum. Head: Eyes widely separated above
antennae. Decumbent scales white, pointed, curved, arranged on edge mesally and
on orbital border, continued forward between eyes; submedian patch of broad,
dark scales; orbital line expanded laterally into patch of broad, white appressed
scales, no orbital line below this patch; postgena with patch of broad, dark scales
with white scales below. Forked, erect scales over dorsal surface, yellow on ver-
tex, dark laterally. Two to 3 pairs of well-developed frontal bristles, usually mixed
light and dark; 3-5 pairs of well-developed dark orbital bristles. Clypeus dark brown
to black, bare. Proboscis short, 1.2-1.5 length of forefemur; entirely dark scaled
or with patch of white scales on basal ventral surface; a few basal bristles pres-
ent. Palpus about 0.25 of proboscis length; 4-segmented, segment 4 reduced, not
visible except in slide preparations; bristles on segments 1-3; dark scaled, occa-
sionally with white scales on apex of segment 1, apical dorsal surface of segment
2 and apical 0.25 of segment 3. Antenna slightly shorter than proboscis; torus
dark brown to black, with patch of white scales on mesal and dorsal surfaces;
flagellar segment 1 slightly longer than segment 2, with patch of white scales on
mesal surface; segments 2-13 with basal whorl of 6 bristles. Thorax: Mesonotum
moderately arched; mesonotal integument dark brown to black, lighter at scutal
angle and postalar margin; entire surface with scales except for normal anterior
inner dorsocentral and median and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; narrow, curved,
dark brown to black scales forming background with varied pattern of very nar-
row golden scales and broader yellow and white scales in lines or patches as fol-
lows: (1) median golden lines or broad patch from anterior promontory to near
prescutellar space, (2) narrow anterior crescent-shaped line formed from lateral
prescutal and posterior fossal lines, (3) narrow outer posterior dorsocentral line,
(4) rather broad supraalar line, (5) patches between outer posterior dorsocentral
line and supraalar line, and (6) anterior and lateral prescutellar lines. Acrostichal
bristles well developed, usually light anteriorly, dark posteriorly; dorsocentral bris-
tles longer than acrostichals, dark, merging posteriorly with dark prescutellars;
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 7
humeral bristles strongly developed, mixed light and dark anteriorly; prescutal
bristles well developed, dark; usually 2 or 3 (1-5) dark posterior fossal bristles;
supraalar bristles numerous, well developed. Paratergite with numerous light or
dark bristles; cluster of white scales posteriorly. Scutellum dark brown; lobes with
patches of broad white scales and 4-8 long, dark bristles and several small, light
bristles. Postnotum dark brown. Pleural integument brown, lighter around spira-
cle and under wing base. Apn not enlarged. Pleural bristles on apn, ppn, ppl,
pst, psp, ssp (varipalpus and laguna), pra, stp, upper mep, lower mep (varipal-
pus and monticola). Apn with patch of mostly erect, narrow, curved, white scales;
ppn with large, rather sparse patch of narrow scales over entire sclerite, scales
black on anterodorsal border, white below (scales entirely white in varipalpus and
deserticola); patches of broad, white semierect or appressed scales on ppl, pst,
psp, long line on ssp, pra below knob, 2 patches on stp, 1 on upper margin and
1 posteriorly at level of midcoxa, the patches often joined by scattered scales,
patches on upper mep and lower mep, the patches sometimes continuous, pcx
(monticola and laguna), and small patch on metameron (except deserticola); hypo-
stigial area and meron without scales. Legs: Short, forefemur about 0.95-1.00 height
of thorax (mesonotum to apex of midcoxa). Hindcoxa slightly smaller than or
subequal to midcoxa, its base below upper margin of meron. Forecoxa with white
and brown scales, midcoxa and hindcoxa with white scales. Trochanters with
white scales. Femora mostly dark scaled, all with narrow basal and apical white
rings and scattered white scales; white scales forming streak on basal ventral sur-
face of forefemur and basal posterior surfaces of midfemur and hindfemur (an
additional basal anterior streak present on hindfemur of /aguna). Foretibia dark
scaled, with narrow basal and apical white rings; midtibia and hindtibia dark scaled,
with very narrow basal white rings and a few apical white scales. Foretarsus dark
scaled, with broad basal and apical white rings on segment 1, usually apical dor-
sal patch on segment 2; midtarsus as foretarsus except for scattered white scales
on apical portion of segment 5; hindtarsus dark scaled, with broad basal and api-
cal white rings on segment 1 (white scales occupying 0.4-0.5 of segment), broad
apical white rings on segments 2 and 3 (white scales occupying 0.3 of segment),
segment 4 with occasional basal and apical white scales except for sierrensis which
has broad basal white ring and scattered apical white scales, segment 5 entirely
white scaled. Foreclaws and midclaws subequal, slightly curved, with slender tooth
at basal third; hindclaws subequal, simple. Wing: Entirely dark scaled except for
white scales at base of C and occasionally base of R. Haltere: Yellowish, with
white scales on upper part of knob. Abdomen: Segments VIII and IX almost
completely retracted into VII. Tergite I with white and dark scales mesally, lat-
erotergite densely white scaled; tergites II-VI dark scaled, with narrow, curved
basal bands of white scales narrowed laterally and large basal rectangular white
patches on lateral margins; a few white scales apically on segment VI and often
V; tergite VII dark scaled, lacking basal white band but with lateral white patches
and rather broad apical white band. Sternites mostly white scaled, with variable
dark patches or bands becoming more extensive on distal segments. Cercus with-
out scales.
FEMALE GENITALIA. Segment VII: Tergite narrowed apically; length along
midline about 0.52-0.63 of tergite VII; uniformly covered with short bristles, a
few longer bristles present, more numerous distally. Sternite about 1.1-1.3 length
of tergite VIII, broader distally; uniformly covered with short bristles; a few long-
er bristles present, more numerous distally; very few scales occasionally present.
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
Tergite IX: Deeply emarginate apically; about 0.39-0.47 length of tergite VIII;
moderately sclerotized; apical lobes with 3-11 weakly developed bristles. Insula:
Moderately sclerotized, connected to sigma; with 1 or 2 pairs of moderately de-
veloped setae. Cercus: Moderately long, dorsal edge 0.65-0.82 length of tergite
VIII; compressed, apex rounded in lateral view; bristles numerous, the largest
strongly developed; scales absent. Postgenital Plate: Short and broad, 0.38-0.50
length of tergite VIII; index (length over width at midlength) about 1.30-1.50;
apex emarginate, distal portion with bristles, the longest moderately developed;
basal median longitudinal apodeme weakly to moderately sclerotized. Cowl: Strong-
ly sclerotized. Atrial plates absent. Sigma: Continuous with cowl, moderately scle-
rotized. Small portion of spermathecal duct strongly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3,
strongly sclerotized, spherical, 1 slightly larger than the others.
MALES. Generally similar to females except for sexual characters. Head: Pro-
boscis 1.3-1.6 length of forefemur, entirely dark scaled or with ventral white streak
on basal 0.4-0.5, often extending dorsally to form white ring from about basal
0.2-0.5. Maxillary palpus about equal to or slightly longer than proboscis; 5-seg-
mented; segment 1 dark scaled, with apical white band; segments 2 and 3 anky-
losed, making up 0.58-0.62 of palpus length, segment 3 expanded apically, both
segments without scales ventrally, remainder dark scaled with narrow white ring
at apex of segment 3, or with white scales over joint between segments 2 and
3 and white ring at apex of segment 3, subapical long bristles on segment 3; seg-
ments 4 and 5 turned down, dark scaled; segment 4 with narrow basal white
ring and numerous long, dark bristles; segment 5 with broad basal white ring and
long, dark bristles, more numerous apically. Antenna shorter than proboscis, torus
enlarged, with white scales on median and dorsal surfaces; flagellar segments 1-
12 with numerous long bristles; segment 1 elongate, with scales on mesal sur-
face; segments 12 and 13 elongate, the 2 combined slightly shorter than first 11
segments. Legs: Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claws with
large, blunt subbasal tooth; smaller claws with acute subbasal tooth; claws of hind-
leg small, subequal, simple. Abdomen: Tergites II-VII lacking basolateral white
scale patches. Sternite VIII with large lateral white scale patches.
MALE GENITALIA. Tan to brown; apex of paraproct, midportion of tergite
IX and basal lobe of sidepiece darker. Segment IX: Tergite well developed; lobes
prominent, darkly pigmented, broader than long, separated by less than width of
1 lobe and bearing 2-10 strong setae. Sternite large, less than twice as broad as
long, with 3-8 setae apically. Sidepiece: Well developed, length 3.0-4.0 of width at
middle; lateral and ventral surfaces covered with strong bristles and scales; dor-
sal surface with short or strong bristles; tergomesal margin bare or with num-
erous short, strong hairs; apicotergal lobe absent; basal tergomesal lobe promi-
nent, with dense patch of strongly developed, apically curved setae or with sin-
gle strongly differentiated apically curved seta and 1 to many long, slender bris-
tles. Claspette: Stem moderately curved, length 4.0-8.0 of width, spiculate, with
several short setae; filament slightly longer than stem, recurved at apex; connec-
tion between claspettes declivous mesally or nearly horizontal with median emar-
gination. Clasper: Simple, moderately long (about 0.7 of sidepiece), slightly ex-
panded before middle, slightly to strongly curved apically; spiniform 0.25-0.30
length of clasper, slightly curved apically. Phallosome: Aedeagus cylindrical, length
2.0 of width, open ventrally. Proctiger: Strongly developed; basolateral scleroti-
zation vertical; paraproct well sclerotized, with a single large heavily sclerotized
apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 2-6.
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 9
PUPAE. Cephalothorax: Yellowish to light brown, darker dorsally. Trumpet wid-
ened gradually from base to apex; amber to brown in color; tracheoid sculptur-
ing developed in basal 0.12-0.25, reticulate sculpturing well developed. Abdomen:
Weakly to darkly pigmented, darker anteriorly. Hair 1-II-[V weakly to moderately
developed, becoming weaker posteriorly, or subequal or becoming stronger on
segments II-I[V; usually double (1-3b) on II, single on III (1,2b), single on IV
(1,2b), weak and single on V and VI. Hair 2-III-VI mesad or laterad of hair 1
of corresponding segment. Hair 3 moderately to strongly developed on segments
IL III,V-VII; weakly developed, multiple on IV; at level or cephalad of 4-IV. Hair
5-IV-VI strongly developed, 0.6-1.0 length of corresponding segment; 5-VII longer
and stronger than 4-VII. Hair 7-V single to 4-branched. Hair 9 short and stout,
caudad of level of hair 6 and subequal in development on segments II-VI; strong-
ly developed, single (1,2b) on VII and considerably cephalad of caudolateral an-
gle of segment. Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe moderately large, about 1.4-
1.5 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length 1.3-1.8 of width. Apex emarginate or
occasionally rounded. Midrib conspicuous nearly to margin. Hair 1-P short, sin-
gle (1,2b).
LARVAE. Head: Width 1.2 of length. Lightly to moderately pigmented, lighter
in ocular area, darker posteriorly; collar deeply pigmented. Hair 1-C stout. Hairs
4,6-C displaced caudad, not near labrum. Hair 4-C moderately developed, 4-16b,
mesad of 1-C and at about same level as 6-C. Hair 5-C usually single (1,2b), slight-
ly mesad or laterad of 6-C. Hair 6-C usually double (1-3b). Hair 7-C 2-9b. Men-
tal plate with 8-12 teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Length 0.4 of
head; shaft length usually 6.0-7.0 of basal width, with very few minute spicules.
Hair 1-A moderately long, inserted slightly beyond middle, single (1-3b). Tho-
rax: Integument pigmented or unpigmented, living larva white or gray in color;
without spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P separate. Hair 1-M,T moderately long,
branched. Hairs 4,5-P branched; 5-M single. Hair 11-P,M,T branched, much short-
er than 9-P. Hair 13-T moderately developed, usually 3-7b (2-10), subequal to
or slightly longer than 14-M. Hair 14-M moderately developed, usually 4,5b (2-
14). Abdomen: Integument as on thorax. Hair 1 moderately to strongly devel-
oped, usually increasing in development from segment I to V. Hair 2 cephalad
of level of hair 1 on segments I-VI, laterad of hair 1 on I,II,VI,VII and in line
with or mesad of hair 1 on IJJ-V. Hair 3-VII weakly developed. Hair 4 mesad
of hair 3 on segments III-V. Hair 6 usually double (1-4b) on segments I-V, sin-
gle or double on VI. Hair 7-I,II moderately to strongly developed, longer or short-
er than hair 10 of corresponding segment. Hair 12-I present or absent. Hair 13-
I,II moderately developed, 2,3b (2-6); hair 13-III-V strongly developed, usually
double (2,3b); hair 13-VI weakly developed, 3-15b, cephalolaterad of 10-VI. Seg-
ment VIII: Hair 1-VIII moderately to strongly developed, 1-4b (1-5); hair 3-VIII
strongly developed, 2-4b (1-5). Comb scales 7-20 (5-24), in irregular single to
triple row; individual comb scales elongate, more or less parallel-sided, with lat-
eral and apical fringe. Siphon: Strongly pigmented; relatively short to moderately
long (index 1.9-3.3); inflated at middle and reduced in diameter apically or with
sides nearly parallel (sierrensis); acus well developed. Pecten teeth 7-14 (7-19) in
number, restricted to basal 0.2-0.3 of siphon; each tooth with 1 or more sub-
basal spines. Hair 1-S strongly developed, usually triple (3-5b), 0.25-0.35 from
base of siphon. Anal Segment: Saddle moderate in size, extending about halfway
around segment; moderately to strongly pigmented, darker dorsally; imbricate
sculpturing indistinct. Hair 1-X strongly developed, single or double (1-3b). Hair
10
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
2-X triple or 4b. Hair 3-X single..Ventral brush (4-X) weakly developed, becom-
ing stronger distally, usually with 6 pairs of hairs, distal 5 pairs (4a-e-X) arising
from grid, usually double; proximal hair (4f-X) double to 6b. Gills sausage-shaped,
subequal; 3.0-5.5 of saddle length.
3(1).
4(3).
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
KEYS TO SPECIES
FEMALES
Postcoxal area with. patch of white. scalese. 2s - Gecd cemee.ce ase darbeace e
Posteoxal.ates withteuG Scales.6 oo ho nl i ve Ee ee beh wh nD
Anterior part of mesonotum with 3 distinct narrow lines of golden scales
between dorsocentral bristles . . . . . . . 1. laguna
Anterior part of mesonotum with broad “patch of golden scales between
dorocentral Dristles:.. ¢. 25° ae oc a ie acwn 2. nontcola
Subspiracular area with several light setae arising from scale patch :
Siac ie eh eugea eaiet ld salt tiis 3. varipalpus
Subspiracular area without setae |
Base of hindtarsal segment 4 with broad white ring; metameron with patch
of white scales; anterodorsal border of ppn usually with dark scales.
. 5. sierrensis
Bae of fd eoemneat 4 Sper Oicad oie ae very narrow white
ring sometimes present; metameron without scales; ppn without dark
SCHR G ite ange Bok cro al tet nase hie einen. Gacetes GOSENTICOIE
MALE GENITALIA
Basal tergomesal lobe of sidepiece with dense patch of strongly developed,
apically curved setae; tergomesal margin of sidepiece with numerous short,
Sirone hairs... ... . . 5. Sierrensis
Basal tergomesal lobe of sidepiece with ia ong: differentiated, apically
curved seta and 1 to several slender bristles; tergomesal margin of side-
poe OU er Onan ny 19
Basal tergomesal lobe of sidepiece with 4 or more long slender bristles in
addition to strongly differentiated seta . . . . 3. varipalpus
Basal tergomesal lobe of sidepiece with 1-3 long slender bristles in addi-
Hom to. stronely dittcrentizied seta ~.. "as. 3 ot ee ke
Differentiated seta of basal tergomesal lobe about 40 times as long as its
Dasai width... . . . . 1. laguna
Differentiated seta of basal tergomesal lobe about 5 30 times as long as
POS eee ee ae eee oh ge a
Lobes of tergite [IX usually with 6 or 7 (4-10) setae .. . . 2. monticola
Lobes of tergite [X usually with 4-6 (2-7) setae . . . . . . 4. deserticola
2(1).
3(1).
4(3).
aT).
3(2).
4(3).
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 11
PUPAE
Abdominal segments I-V pigmented brown at least mesally. . . . . . .2
Abdominal segments I-V pigmented light yellowish-brown. . . . .. .3
Entire abdomen pigmented brown except for light yellowish-brown areas
on lateral margins of segments V-VII]. ... . ei i laguna
Abdominal segment I and median anterior portions ‘of segments II-IV pig-
mented brown, remainder of abdomen light yellowish-brown .
. 5. sierrensis
Hair 1-IV more strongly developed than 1-1 or 1-V and usually double.
: 3. varipalpus
Hair 1IV subequal in development ‘to 1-Ill and eae :
Cephalothorax light yellowish-brown with darker pigmentation on middorsal
line; hair 1-II usually single (1-3b) . . . . 2. monticola
Cephalothorax Hae ee A yellowish-brown: hair ac usually double
2) Breer & j ragga . . « « « « 4, deserticola
LARVAE
Body pigmented, gray in color; siphon relatively long (index usually at
least 3.0), not inflated at middle, not reduced in diameter apically; comb
scales usually more than 15... . . . 3. sierrensis
Body unpigmented, white in color; siphon short @ndex less than 2.8), in-
flated near middle and sharply reduced in diameter apically; comb scales
Ustially Tess Chiaie a5 ea ag OR Ie ere ny gee enc gt ae
Hair 1-X usually single, rarely double; 1-VIII frequently single; pecten teeth
few in number (7-11) and restricted to basal 0.20 of siphon . ie
ae . 4. deserticola
Hair 13% double, "rarely ‘single: ‘1-VIII usually ‘triple, never single; pecten
teeth more numerous (10-14) and extending to at least basal 0.25 of
SHON ORAS. CA: BREN! ROLE Sau ARE, FPS ARNE ARR EO ea SR Oe
Siphon index 2.6-2.8 (2.5-3.0); hair 6-VI usually double. . . . . 1. laguna
Siphon indéx dess*than 2:5 hair 6-VF single) 2) eV a er,
Hairs 1-IV,V usually with same number of branches and frequently sub-
equal to hair 13 of corresponding segment; 7-P frequently triple; anal
gills about 3.5 of saddle length . . . . 2. monticola
Hairs 1-IV,V usually with more branches than and usually weaker than
hair 13 of corresponding segment; 7-P usually double, rarely triple; anal
gills usually about 4.5 of saddle length. . . ... . . . 3. varipalpus
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
1. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) laguna Arnell & Nielsen, n.sp.
Figs. 1-4
TYPES: Holotype male (UCLA 695-12) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia
slide, La Laguna meadow, elevation 6800 ft, Sierra Laguna, 20 mi ENE Todas Santos, Baja
California Sur, Mexico, larva from a rothole in a living oak (Quercus sp.), 27 Aug 1970, J.H.
Arnell and L.T. Nielsen [USNM]. Allotype female (UCLA 695-21) with associated larval and
pupal skins, same data as holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 3 lpF (UCLA 695-11,17,18), 39 M,
60 F, 98 P, 239 L (UCLA 695), same data as holotype [UCLA, UTAH, USNM].
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) monticola of Belkin and McDonald (1957:188).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus of Ross (1943:86).
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 3.65 mm. Proboscis: 2.55 mm. Forefemur: 1.95 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.70 mm. Head: Erect scales mostly yellow; a few dark erect
scales laterally. Proboscis dark scaled, with small patch of white scales on basal
ventral surface. Palpus with segment 1 entirely dark scaled. Thorax: Mesonotum
with narrow line of narrow golden scales along acrostichal line from anterior pro-
montory to near prescutellar space; stripe of golden scales just mesad of anter-
ior dorsocentral line from prescutal area to middle of mesonotum; outer poster-
ior dorsocentral line composed of yellow and white scales; patches between outer
dorsocentral line and supraalar line reduced; anterior prescutellar patch white.
Acrostichal bristles mostly light, a few dark. Pon with narrow dark scales anter-
iorly and broader white scales in sparse patch posteriorly, scales becoming more
dense posteroventrally, 4-8 light setae posteriorly; ppl with about 30 light setae;
ssp often with 1-3 light setae arising from scale patch; pcx with patch of white
scales. Foretarsal segment 2 with apical dorsal white scale patch reduced or ab-
sent; midtarsal segment 5 entirely dark scaled; hindfemur with anterior and pos-
terior basal white streak; hindtarsal segment 1 with broad basal and apical white
rings, white scales occupying about 0.5 of segment; hindtarsal segment 4 with
very narrow apical white ring.
MALE. Wing: 3.00 mm. Proboscis: 2.80 mm. Forefemur: 1.80 mm. Abdomen:
about 2.90 mm. Proboscis with ventral white streak on basal 0.4, extending dor-
sally to form ring from about basal 0.2-0.4: Palpus without white scales over joint
between segments 2 and 3. or
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 3). Segment IX: Tergite lobe with about 6 (48) se-
tae. Sidepiece: Length 4.0 of width at middle; lateral 0.33 of dorsal surface with
strong bristles and scales, mesal 0.67 of dorsal surface with short bristles becom-
ing stronger toward apex; tergomesal margin bare; basal tergomesal lobe with sin-
gle strongly differentiated, apically curved seta and 1-3 long slender bristles; length
of differentiated seta about 40.0 of width at base. Claspette: Stem moderately
curved, length 8.0 of width; filament slightly longer than stem, flattened beyond
middle, sharply recurved at apex; connection between claspettes declivous me-
sally. Clasper: Strongly curved apically; spiniform about 0.3 of clasper length.
PUPA (fig. 3). Abdomen: 3.35 mm. Trumpet: 0.51 mm. Paddle: 0.82 mm.
Cephalothorax: Light brown, darker dorsally; trumpet dark yellowish-brown; meta-
notum brown, haltere case lighter. Abdomen: Dark brown, yellowish on lateral
margins and posterior segments. Hair 1-II usually double, often triple, rarely sin-
gle; 1-III-V subequal in development. Hair 5-III subequal to 1-III and weaker than
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 13
3-III. Hairs 5-IV-VI strongly developed, subequal. Hair 7-V usually single. Pad-
dle: Apex emarginate; length 1.3-1.5 of width.
LARVA (fig. 4). Head: 0.83 mm. Siphon: 0.89 mm. Saddle: 0.28 mm. Tho-
rax: Integument unpigmented, living larva white. Hair 7-P usually triple, rarely
double. Abdomen: Integument as on thorax. Hair 1 stronger than hair 13 on
segment II, generally weaker and with more branches than hair 13 on III-V. Hair
6 usually double on segments I-VI. Hair 7-I,II well developed, stronger than hair
10 on corresponding segment. Hair 12-I absent. Segment VIII: Hair 1 usually
triple (2-4b); hair 3 usually triple (2,3b). Comb scales 12-15 (10-22), in single
or irregular double row. Siphon: Index 2.6-2.8 (2.5-3.0); inflated just before mid-
dle, sharply reduced in diameter apically. Pecten teeth 11-14 (10-17); restricted
to basal 0.25 of siphon. Hair 1-S triple, 0.25-0.35 from base of siphon. Anal
Segment: Hair 1-X usually double (1-3b). Gills about 4.0 of siphon length.
SYSTEMATICS. The pattern of golden scales on the mesonotum of adults of
laguna is distinctive, there being 3 discrete narrow lines on the anterior part rather
than a broad patch characteristic of the other members of the group. One to 3
light setae arise from the subspiracular scale patch in many adults and the post-
coxal scale patch is always present. The male genitalia of laguna, although very
similar to those of monticola and deserticola, with 1 differentiated seta and 3
or fewer stout bristles on the basal tergomesal lobe of the sidepiece, can be dis-
tinguished from the latter 2 species by the differentiated seta being relatively fine
and its length about 40 times its basal diameter instead of 25-30 times as in mont-
icola and deserticola. The brown pigmentation of the cephalothorax and abdo-
men of the pupa of laguna is unique among the Varipalpus Group and there
are slight differences in chaetotaxy from the other species, hair 1-II being usu-
ally double and 7-V usually single. The larva of laguna can be distinguished from
the other members of the group primarily by the more elongate (index 2.5-3.0)
and medially inflated siphon, hair 6-VI usually double and 7-P usually triple.
Aedes laguna is probably close to the parental stock which gave rise to the
Varipalpus Group and may be a relict remnant of a more extensive population
that inhabited western Mexico prior to the separation of Baja California from the
mainland. A more thorough discussion is presented under group systematics above.
BIONOMICS. Aedes laguna has been collected at only 1 locality, a meadow
at an elevation of about 6,800 feet near the top of the Sierra Laguna, approxi-
mately 20 miles ENE of Todos Santos, Baja California Sur, Mexico. The area is
a cloud forest of pine and oak with a ground cover of grasses and low shrubs.
Larvae of laguna were collected from 2 treeholes in living oak (Quercus sp.). One
hole was small, containing less than 50 ml of water and few larvae. The other
hole was approximately 8 inches in diameter, 6-8 inches deep and contained about
2 liters of water. Several hundred larvae were removed, the majority of them in
the fourth instar. No eggs were obtained from the treeholes in the area. Several
collections of Orthopodomyia kummi Edwards, 1939 were made in treeholes in
the same area but these did not contain laguna. A mermithid nematode parasite
was found in about 25 laguna larvae. The nematode was usually aligned longi-
tudinally in the haemocoele of the fourth instar larva and coiled back on itself
once. It was observed to exit the mosquito body through the siphon, leaving the
larva dead or dying. Nothing is known of the habits of laguna except that fe-
males are avid biters. Within 5 minutes, at noon with low clouds and light mist,
about 15 females were captured while attempting to bite and many more avoided
capture.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
_ DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Mountains of the Cape Region of Baja California. All
material examined is listed above in the type series.
2. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) monticola Belkin & McDonald
Figs. 1,2,5,6
1957. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) monticola Belkin and McDonald, 1957:179-191. TYPE: Holotype
male (UCLA 173-104) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia slide, Madera
Canyon (Santa Cruz Co.), Arizona, U.S.A., elevation ca 5000 ft, 18 Aug 1955, W.A.
McDonald [USNM, 63244].
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) monticola of McDonald (1957:505); Zavortink (1970:1); Lunt and Nielsen
(1971:110).
Aedes monticola of Nielsen, Arnell and Linam (1967:74); Nielsen, Linam, Arnell and Zavortink
(1968:362).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus in part of Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:257).
Aedes varipalpus in part of Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:39); Peyton (1956:220); Richards,
Nielsen and Rees (1956:14).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) varipalpus in part of Dyar (1922:86).
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 3.45 mm. Proboscis: 2.20 mm. Forefemur: 1.75 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.65 mm. Head: Erect scales yellow on vertex; numerous dark
erect scales laterally. Proboscis dark scaled, with small patch of white scales on
basal ventral surface. Palpus with a few white scales on apex of segment I. Tho-
rax: Mesonotum with broad dense patch of narrow golden scales from anterior
promontory to near prescutellar space, often narrow lines of white scales anter-
iorly at lateral margin of golden patch and anteriorly along acrostichal line; lat-
eral prescutal white scales relatively sparse; outer posterior dorsocentral line broad
anteriorly, composed of white and golden scales, narrowed and composed of white
scales posteriorly; supraalar line narrowed; patches between outer posterior dor-
socentral line and supraalar line conspicuous, golden anteriorly and white poster-
iorly; anterior prescutellar patch white. Acrostichal bristles dark. Pon with nar-
row dark scales anteriorly and broader white scales in sparse patch posteroven-
trally, 4-10 mixed light and dark setae posteriorly; pp/ with about 30 light setae;
ssp without setae; pcx with dense tuft of white scales; lower mep usually with
2-4 light setae arising from cephalodorsal margin of scale patch, scale patch large,
often continuous with scale patch on upper mep. Hindtarsal segment 1 with broad
basal and apical white rings, white scales occupying about 0.5 of segment; hind-
tarsal segment 4 entirely dark scaled.
MALE. Wing: 2.75 mm. Proboscis: 2.20 mm. Forefemur: 1.65 mm. Abdomen:
about 2.75 mm. Proboscis with ventral white streak on basal 0.5, usually extend-
ing dorsally to form white ring from about basal 0.3-0.5. Palpus without white
scales over joint between segments 2 and 3.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 5). Segment IX: Tergite lobe bearing 6 or 7 (4-10)
setae. Sidepiece: Length 4.0 times width at middle; lateral 0.33 of dorsal surface
with strong bristles and scales, mesal 0.67 of dorsal surface with short bristles
becoming stronger toward apex; tergomesal margin bare; basal tergomesal lobe
with single strongly differentiated, apically curved seta and 1-3 long, slender bris-
tles; length of differentiated seta about 25.0-30.0 of width at base. Claspette:
Stem moderately curved, length 8.0 of width; filament slightly longer than stem,
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 15
flattened beyond middle, sharply recurved at apex; connection between claspettes
declivous mesally. Clasper: Strongly curved apically; spiniform about 0.3 of clasper
length.
PUPA (fig. 5). Abdomen: 3.78 mm. Trumpet: 0.47 mm. Paddle: 0.89 mm.
Cephalothorax: Light yellowish-brown, darker in caudal middorsal area; trumpet
amber; metanotum darker mesally. Abdomen: Light yellowish-brown, slightly dark-
er mesally on anterior segments. Hair 1-II usually single; 1-III-V subequal in de-
velopment. Hair 5-III usually subequal to 1-III and more weakly developed than
3-III but often subequal to 3-III and stronger than 1-III. Hairs 5-IV-VI strongly
developed, subequal. Hair 7-V usually double. Paddle: Apex emarginate, length
1.3-1.6 of width.
LARVA (fig. 6). Head: 0.96 mm. Siphon: 0.90 mm. Saddle: 0.30 mm. Tho-
rax: Integument unpigmented, living larva white. Hair 7-P double or triple. Ab-
domen: Integument as on thorax. Hair 1 stronger than hair 13 on segment II,
weaker and with more branches than hair 13 on III and often subequal to hair
13 (2b) on IV and V. Hair 6 usually double on segments I-V, single on VI. Hair
7-I,I] well developed, stronger than hair 10 on corresponding segment. Hair 12-I
absent. Segment VIII: Hairs 1 and 3 usually triple (2,3b). Comb scales 9-13 (7-
17), in single or irregular double row. Siphon: Index 2.2-2.5; concave on basal
ventral surface, inflated just beyond middle, sharply reduced in diameter apically.
Pecten teeth 11-14 (8-17); restricted to basal 0.3 of siphon. Hair 1-S usually trip-
le (3-5b), 0.30-0.35 from base of siphon. Anal Segment: Hair 1-X usually double
(2-4b). Gills usually about 3.5 of saddle length.
SYSTEMATICS. The mesonotal scale pattern of adult monticola is more sharply
defined than in the other members of the group, the golden and white scales
being more densely clustered and prominent, with no intermediate yellow scales.
The pleural setae are more numerous and the pleural scale patches are larger with
the scales more erect, lending a shaggy appearance to the pleuron. Present are
dense clusters of scales in the postcoxal area and lower mesepimeral setae. The
male genitalia of monticola are almost indistinguishable from those of laguna and
deserticola with 1 differentiated seta and 3 or fewer stout bristles on the basal
tergomesal lobe of the sidepiece. However the differentiated seta is stouter in
monticola than in laguna and the lobes of the ninth tergite generally have more
setae (6 or 7) in monticola than in deserticola. The pupa of monticola is sim-
ilar in pigmentation to varipalpus but can be distinguished from it by hairs 1-
III-V being subequal. The larva of monticola is readily differentiated from laguna
and deserticola by the characters given in the key, but its separation from vari-
palpus by the key characters is not always reliable. The siphon of monticola is
usually longer than in varipalpus, with an index of 2.2-2.5 in the former and 1.9-
2.4 in the latter.
Hybridization between monticola and varipalpus is apparent in specimens col-
lected at 2 localities in Oak Creek Canyon, Arizona, and is discussed under vari-
palpus.
BIONOMICS. The adults of monticola attack man readily but nothing else is
known of their habits. Larvae have been collected from treeholes in oak (Quercus
sp.), cottonwood (Populus fremontii), willow (Salix sp.) and sycamore (Platanus
racemosa). This species is found primarily in riverine situations in cottonwood,
willow and sycamore over much of its range but is widespread in the oak wood-
land at the higher elevations in southeastern Arizona and adjacent New Mexico
and Sonora.
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
Aedes monticola has been found with varipalpus at 1 locality in Oak Creek
Canyon; with Toxorhynchites sp. in 2 collections in Cochise and Santa Cruz Coun-
ties; with Aedes purpureipes Aitken, 1941 and an undescribed species in the Aedes
kompi group from several localities in Pima and Santa Cruz Counties and | lo-
cality in Sonora; with Orthopodomyia kummi Edwards, 1939 in southeastern Ari-
zona, and with Aedes muelleri Dyar, 1920, Anopheles judithae Zavortink, 1969
and Orthopodomyia signifera (Coquillett, 1896) throughout most of its range. In
1 willow treehole in Hidalgo County, New Mexico, monticola larvae were found
in association with muelleri, judithae, signifera and kummi. Under laboratory con-
ditions, at temperatures of 65° to 75° F, monticola developed from eggs to adults
in 23 days.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes monticola has been collected in the Gila River
drainage of Arizona and New Mexico, 1 collection in the Little Colorado River
drainage of Arizona and 1 collection in the Rio Magdalena drainage of Sonora.
Material examined: 1897 specimens; 325 males, 346 females, 801 larvae, 425 pu-
pae; 206 individual rearings (142 larval, 64 pupal).
MEXICO
Sonora. Nogales, 8.8 mi S Mex.-U.S. border, 13 June 1971, TJZ, LTN (MEX 703), 2 lpM
(703-10,12), 3 IpF (703-11,13,14), 1 M, 3 P [UCLA].
UNITED STATES
Arizona. Cochise Co.: Carr Canyon, 5 Sept 1966, TJZ (UCLA 338), 1 lpM (338-10) [UCLA] ;
same data (UCLA 339), 2 IpM (339-11,19), 6 IpF (339-10,12,13,15-17), 10 pM (339-40,41,100-
107), 4 pF (339-108-111), 5 M, 10 P, 5 L [UCLA]. Cave Creek Canyon, 15 June 1963, J.
Burger (UCLA 387), 1 F [UCLA]. Cochise Stronghold, Dragoon Mts., 5000 ft, 26 Aug 1964, J.
Burger (UCLA 257), 9 F [UCLA]; same data, 22 Mar 1966, TJZ (UCLA 302), 1 IpM (302-16)
[UCLA]; same data (UCLA 303), 5 IpM (303-10,13,14,17,40), 6 IpF (303-11,12,15,16,18,19),
1 pM (303-100), 1 pF (303-101), 2 P, 5 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 304), 3 IpM (304-10,17,
42), 11 pF (304-11-16,18,19,41,43), 12 pM (304-40,100-109,113,114), 4 pF (304-110-112,114),
18 M, 6 F, 25 P, 48 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 305), 6 lpM (305-10-13,17,18), 4 IpF (305-
14-16,19), 2 pM (305-100,101), 1 pF (305-102), 3 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 306), 4 IpM
(306-10-12,18), 6 IpF (306-13-17,19), 16 pM (306-41,43,45,100-112), 3 pF (306-40,113,114),
1M, 2 F,4P, 3 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 427), 1 F, 1 P, 1 L [UCLA]; same data, 4 Sept 1966
(UCLA 325), 1 pF (325-100) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 326), 1 M, 2 F,4P, 1 L [UCLA];
same data (UCLA 329), 4 IpF (329-10-13), 5 M, 13 F, 27 P, 5 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA
330), 1 IpF (330-10), 1 pF (330-111) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 332), 1 F [UCLA]. Coronado
Natl. Mon., 5200 ft, 20 Mar 1968, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 659), 2 M, 4 F [UCLA-UTAH].
Southwest Research Station, 5 mi SW Portal, 5-25 Sept 1965, C.W. Sabrosky, 1 F [USNM].
Coconino Co.: Oak Creek Canyon, Manzanita Campground, 4700 ft, 24 May 1970, HA, LTN,
RN (UCLA 682), 1 IpM (682-22), 5 IpF (682-11,14,15,20,23), 11 M, 7 F, 7 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Gila Co.: Armer Mtn. Trail, Sierra Ancha Mts., 25 May 1963, J. Burger (UCLA 381), 3 F [UCLA].
Globe, 3541 ft, 22 Mar 1966, LTN (UCLA 636), 19 M, 22 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Globe (19 mi
NE), 4500 ft, 2 Sept 1966, TJZ (UCLA 331), 1 F, 2 P [UCLA]. Navajo Co.: Mortensen Wash, 14
mi W Show Low, 14 Aug 1966, LTN (UCLA 637), 5 M, 6 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Pima Co.: Babo-
quivari Camp, Baboquivari Mts., 3550 ft, 31 Dec 1969, TJZ (UCLA 558), 1 lpM (558-32) [UCLA].
Sabino Canyon, Baboquivari Mts., 3900 ft, 30 Dec 1969, TJZ (UCLA 554), 5 lpM (554-20,21,
24-26), 5 IpF (544-22,23,29,34,35), 1 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 560), 3 IpM (560-30-32),
1 IpF (560-33), 10 L [UCLA]. Sycamore Canyon, Baboquivari Mts., 3500-3700 ft, 31 Dec
1969, TJZ (UCLA 557), 1 IpM (557-10) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 567), 1 M, 1 P,1L
[UCLA]. Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Mts., 3500 ft, 7 Sept 1969, TJZ (UCLA 627), 6 F [UCLA];
same data, 29 Dec 1969, TJZ, LTN (UCLA 551), 2 pM (551-100,101) [UCLA]; same data
(UCLA 552), 1 IpM (552-21), 4 IpF (552-20,22-24), 1 M, 1 F, 2 P, 14 L [UCLA]; same data
(UCLA 555), 1 IpF (555-31) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 561), 1 IpM (561-30), 3 IpF (561-
31-33) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 653), 3 IpF (653-15,17,18), 1 M, 5 F, 24 L [UCLA-UTAH] ;
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 17
same data (UCLA 654), 4 M, 13 F [UCLA-UTAH]; same data, 30 Dec 1969 (UCLA 553), 4 IpM
(553-21,23-25), 8 IpF (553-20,22,26-31), 82 M, 48 F, 122 P, 467 L [UCLA]. Molino Basin,
Santa Catalina Mts., 5000 ft, 2 June 1963, J. Burger (UCLA 385), 1 F [UCLA]. Pinal Co.:
Aravaipa Canyon, 11 mi E Hwy. 77, 2600 ft, 21 Dec 1966, LTN (UCLA 638), 2 M, 2 F, 1 P
3 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Santa Cruz Co.: Calabasas Canyon, 21 Mar 1966, TJZ (UCLA 296), 1 IpM
(296-10), 2 lpF (296-11,12), 2 pM (296-100,102), 1 P, 1 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 297),
3 IpM (297-10,11,13), 6 lpF (297-12,14-18), 4 pM (297-100-103) [UCLA]; same data, 13 Sept
1968 (UCLA 451), 3 pM (451-10,100,101), 1 pF (451-102) [UCLA]. Lochiel (11 mi E), 5100
ft, 21 Mar 1968, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 660), 3 M, 5 F, 3 L [UCLA-UTAH] ; same data, 27 Dec
1969, TJZ, LTN (UCLA 559), 1 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 562), 1 L [UCLA]. Madera
Canyon, Santa Rita Mts., 5000 ft, 17 Aug 1955, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 170), 12 F [UCLA];
same data, 18 Aug 1955 (UCLA 173), 2 IpF (173-102,103), 1 P, 2 L [UCLA]; same data,
30 June 1956 (UCLA 206), 2 L, E [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 219), 1 lpM (219-103) [UCLA] ;
same data, 21 Aug 1970, HA, LTN (UCLA 694), 7 IpF (694-11-17), 37 M, 52 F, 19 L [UCLA-
UTAH]. Patagonia (1.7 mi SW), 4000 ft, 21 Mar 1968, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 662), 4 M, 4 F
[UCLA-UTAH]; same data, 13 Sept 1968, TJZ (UCLA 455), 1 lpM (455-10) [UCLA]; same
data (UCLA 460), 1 IpM (460-10), 2 IpF (460-12,16); same data, 14 Sept 1968 (UCLA 463),
1 IpM (463-10), 1 lpF (463-11) [UCLA]; same data, 14 Sept 1968 (UCLA 471), 1 IpF (471-
15) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 472), 1 lpM (472-20) [UCLA]. Yavapai Co.: Prescott (7.5 mi
NNE), 5150 ft, 19 Mar 1966, LTN (UCLA 635), 3 M, 4 F, 1 P, 3 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Wet
Beaver Creek, 2 mi E I-17, 3700 ft, 29 Aug 1970, HA, LTN (UCLA 696), 10 M, 8 F, 8 P,
29 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Verde River at Hwy. 79, 3200 ft, 22 Mar 1968, HA, LTN (UCLA 663),
1 F [UCLA].
New Mexico. Hidalgo Co.: Animas (15 mi S), 4700 ft, 19 Mar 1968, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA
657), 34 M, 44 F [UCLA-UTAH].
3. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) varipalpus (Coquillett)
Figs. 1,2,7-9
1902. Culex varipalpus Coquillett, 1902:292-293. TYPE: Holotype female, Williams (Coconino
Co.), Arizona, U.S.A., 29 July 1902, H.S. Barber [USNM, 6559].
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) varipalpus of Belkin and McDonald (1957:179,189,191); Myers (1967:806);
Zavortink (1970:1); Lunt and Nielsen (1971:110).
Aedes varipalpus of Dyar and Knab (1906:200); McDonald (1957:505); Nielsen and Rees (1959:
46); Nielsen, Arnell and Linam (1967:75).
Aedes varipalpus in part of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:644); Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:
39); Peyton (1956:220); Richards, Nielsen and Rees (1956:14).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus of Nielsen and Rees (1961:33).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus in part of Edwards (1932:154); Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:257);
Pratt (1956:6).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) varipalpus in part of Dyar (1922:86).
Aedes (?) varipalpus of Knight and Marks (1952:517).
Ochlerotatus varipalpus of Coquillett (1906:20).
Culex varipalpus of Blanchard (1905:628,630); Theobald (1910:365).
FEMALE (figs. 2,7). Wing: 3.68 mm. Proboscis: 2.40 mm. Forefemur: 1.85
mm. Abdomen: about 2.80 mm. Head: Erect scales mostly yellow; a few dark
erect scales laterally. Proboscis dark scaled, with small patch of white scales on
basal ventral surface. Palpus with a few white scales on apex of segment 1. Tho-
rax: Mesonotum with broad patch of narrow golden scales from anterior pro-
montory to about middle of mesonotum, this patch sparse, blending gradually
into area of dark scales laterally; outer posterior dorsocentral line of yellow and
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
white scales; patches between outer posterior dorsocentral line and supraalar line
golden and yellow, scales sparse; anterior prescutellar patch mixed yellow and
white. Acrostichal bristles dark. Ppn with large, sparse patch of white scales over
entire sclerite, more numerous posteroventrally, single or double row of 6-12 mix-
ed light and dark setae posteriorly, usually 2 or 3 light setae continuing toward
ventral margin of sclerite; ppl with about 30 light setae; ssp with 4-6 (2-9) light
setae arising from scale patch; pcx without scales; lower mep usually with 2-4
light setae arising from cephalodorsal margin of scale patch. Hindtarsal segment
1 with broad basal and apical white rings, white scales occupying 0.5 of segment;
hindtarsal segment 4 usually with small basal dorsal patch of white scales, re-
mainder dark scaled.
MALE (fig. 7). Wing: 3.05 mm. Proboscis: 2.35 mm. Forefemur: 1.70 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.75 mm. Proboscis with ventral white streak on basal 0.5, us-
ually extending dorsally to form white ring from about basal 0.3-0.5. Palpus with- _
out white scales over joint between segments 2 and 3.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 8). Segment [X: Tergite lobe with 5 or 6 (3-10) se-
tae. Sidepiece: Length 4.0 of width at middle; lateral 0.33 of dorsal surface with
strong bristles and scales, mesal 0.67 of dorsal surface with short bristles becom-
ing stronger toward apex; tergomesal margin bare; basal tergomesal lobe with sin-
gle strongly differentiated, apically curved seta and 4 or more long, slender bris-
tles. Claspette: Stem moderately curved, length 8.0 of width; filament slightly
longer than stem, flattened beyond middle, sharply recurved at apex; connection
between claspettes declivous mesally. Clasper: Strongly curved apically; spiniform
about 0.3 of clasper length.
PUPA (fig. 8). Abdomen: 3.89 mm. Trumpet: 0.56 mm. Paddle: 0.79 mm.
Cephalothorax: Light yellowish-brown, darker on caudal middorsal area; trumpet
amber; metanotum darker mesally. Abdomen: Light yellowish-brown, slightly dark-
er mesally on anterior segments. Hair 1-II usually single; 1-IV relatively strongly
developed, usually double (1-3b), longer than 1-III or 1-V. Hair 5-III usually sub-
equal to 1-III and more weakly developed than 3-III but often subequal to 3-
III and stronger than 1-IIJ. Hairs 5-IV-VI strongly developed, subequal. Hair 7-V
double. Paddle: Apex emarginate; length 1.4-1.6 of width.
LARVA (fig. 9). Head: 0.78 mm. Siphon: 0.60 mm. Saddle: 0.19 mm. Thorax:
Integument unpigmented, living larva white. Hair 7-P double or triple. Abdomen:
Integument as on thorax. Hair 1 stronger than hair 13 on segment II, weaker
and usually with more branches than hair 13 on III-V. Hair 6 usually double
on segments I-V, single on VI. Hair 7-I,I] well developed, stronger than hair 10
on corresponding segment. Hair 12-I absent. Segment VII: Hairs 1 and 3 usu-
ally triple (2,3b). Comb scales 10-12 (5-16) in single or irregular double row.
Siphon: Index 1.9-2.4; concave on basal ventral surface, inflated at middle, sharp-
ly reduced in diameter apically. Pecten teeth 10-12 (8-15); restricted to basal 0.3
of siphon. Hair 1-S usually triple (3-5b), 0.30-0.35 from base of siphon. Anal
Segment: Hair 1-X usually double (2-4b). Gills usually about 4.5 (3.0-5.0) of sad-
dle length.
SYSTEMATICS. Adults of varipalpus can be distinguished from other species
of the group by the cluster of light setae arising from the subspiracular scale patch
and the absence of postcoxal scales. The presence of setae in the subspiracular
area is an unusual character, known in no other mosquito except laguna and Ae-
des muelleri. The golden scale patch on the anterior mesonotum is relatively sparse,
with golden scales blending gradually into dark brown scales laterally. Lower mep
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 19
setae are usually present. The male genitalia are distinguishable from those of
monticola, laguna and deserticola by the basal tergomesal lobe of the sidepiece
having numerous long, slender bristles in addition to the single differentiated seta
while the former 3 species have 3 or less slender bristles. The pupa of varipal-
pus has a pigmentation identical to that of monticola but it can be distinguished
from the latter by hair 1-IV being more strongly developed than 1-III or 1-V.
The larva of varipalpus can be readily separated from laguna and deserticola by
the characters given in the key. However the larvae of varipalpus and monticola
are almost indistinguishable. The characters given in the key are generally good,
but because of considerable variation are not always reliable. The siphon of vari-
palpus is usually shorter than that of monticola, with an index of 1.9-2.4 in the
former and 2.2-2.5 in the latter. ,
Several individuals of varipalpus were collected in Provo, Utah, which had ab-
normally well-developed larval hairs and extra hairs on the venter of the protho-
rax and mesothorax. These specimens were the only examples of “hairy” larvae
noted in this study, although “hairy” larvae are common in some other groups
of treehole-breeding mosquitoes.
Aedes varipalpus is allopatric from the other species in the group with the ex-
ception of Oak Creek Canyon, Arizona, where its range overlaps with monticola.
Material from this area shows evidence of hybridization between the 2 species.
Hybrids have been found in 2 collections, 1 from a cottonwood treehole at Slide
Rock Campground in which all individuals appear to be hybrids, and the other
from an oak treehole near Manzanita Campground, several miles below the former
site, from which monticola, varipalpus and varipalpus-monticola hybrids were taken.
Oak Creek Canyon is in the upper Gila River drainage and the canyon bottom
is at an elevation of 4200 to 4800 feet. While monticola has been taken at sev-
eral nearby localities at comparable elevations, the nearest record of varipalpus
is at Williams, approximately 40 air miles NW of Oak Creek Canyon and at an
elevation of over 6800 feet. Since Oak Creek Canyon is the only record for vari-
palpus in Arizona outside the Colorado River drainage, it is probable that vari-
palpus has invaded the lower elevations in the Oak Creek Canyon area quite re-
cently. It is surprising that nearly all individuals in which hybridization is evi-
dent show introgression of monticola characters into varipalpus, although monti-
cola is much more abundant and probably better established in the immediate
area. The adults of all but 1 hybrid individual are typical varipalpus in general
appearance but with the monticola characters of a few pcx scales, dark scales
on the ppn and an increased number of dark erect scales on the vertex. The pu-
pae are typical varipalpus and since the larvae of these 2 species are difficult to
distinguish from each other no hybrid characters are evident. One specimen (UCLA
682-24) from the Manzanita Campground collection is typical monticola in gen-
eral appearance but with a reduced number of pcx scales and several ssp setae.
The pupa shows the monticola characters of hairs 1-III-V being subequal. If the
varipalpus-like individuals are F, hybrids, which would seem likely due to their
abundance, then the monticola-like hybrid may be a backcross to monticola. Since
varipalpus characters predominate in supposed F, hybrids, in backcrosses into vari-
palpus, monticola characters may become entirely submerged.
Aedes varipalpus probably invaded the Great Basin from the Colorado River
drainage in southwestern Utah and moved north along the Sevier River and the
margins of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville. It is now found only in isolated popu-
lations in a number of canyons containing cottonwood groves in central and south-
ern Utah.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
BIONOMICS. Females of varipalpus attack humans readily although they have
never been encountered in large numbers. They have been taken biting in Zion
National Park, Utah, at dusk and at midday in the shade. Larvae have been col-
lected from treeholes in scrub oak (Quercus gambelli) and cottonwood (Populus
fremontii) in Arizona and cottonwood, narrow-leaf cottonwood (P. angustifolia),
willow (Salix sp.) and maple (Acer spp.) in Utah. Larvae of varipalpus have been
taken in association with Orthopodomyia signifera near Boulder, Garfield Co.,
Utah, and Oak Creek Canyon, Arizona; with Aedes muelleri at Williams, Hualpai
Mountains and Oak Creek Canyon in Arizona; and with monticola in Oak Creek
Canyon. Aedes varipalpus overwinters in the larval stage in the lower elevations
of southern Utah and Arizona and in the egg stage in the higher elevations of
Arizona and Utah where freezing temperatures are common for several months
of the year.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes varipalpus has been collected in the Colorado
River drainage of southwestern Utah and northwestern Arizona, at 1 locality in
the Gila River drainage of Arizona and the eastern margins of the Great Basin
in Utah. Material examined: 1178 specimens; 200 males, 484 females, 303 lar-
vae, 191 pupae; 150 individual rearings (134 larval, 11 pupal, 5 incomplete).
UNITED STATES
Arizona. Coconino Co,: Oak Creek Canyon, Manzanita Campground, 4700 ft, 24 May 1970,
HA, LTN, RN (UCLA 682), 2 IpM (682-18,27), 2 IpF (682-16,19), 9 M, 6 F, 2 L [UCLA-
UTAH]. Williams, 6800 ft, 4 Aug 1956, J.N. Belkin and W.A. McDonald (UCLA 212), 9 IpM (212-
143,160,162,165,168,174,186,199,210), 9 IpF (212-161,164,166,170,178,179,197,217,218), 5
pM (212-148,151,153-155), 2 pF (212-145,149), 5 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 213), 2 F
[UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 214), 2 IpM (214-116,121), 10 lpF (214-105,111-114,117-120,122),
3 pM (214-107,109,110), 1 pF (214-106), 1 lp (214-115), 10 L [UCLA]; same data, 5 Aug
1956 (UCLA 216), 1 F [UCLA]. Mojave Co.: Beaver Dam, 1 Jan 1967, TIZ (UCLA 416), 5 IpM
(416-10,14,18,20,22), 8 IpF (416-11-13,15-17,19,21), 10 M, 11 F, 23 P, 22 L [UCLA]. Hualpai
Mtn. Park, 6200 ft, 4 Aug 1956, J.N. Belkin and W.A. McDonald (UCLA 210), 3 IpF (210-102,
103,105), 2 Ip (210-101,104), 3 L [UCLA]; same data, 3 Mar 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA 667),
1 IpM (667-16), 9 IpF (667-11-15,17-20), 8 M, 77 F, 35 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Utah. Beaver Co.: Beaver (2 mi E), 5970 ft, 24 Oct 1969, HA (UCLA 675), 6 M, 7 F [UCLA-
UTAH]. Garfield Co.: Boulder (10 mi E), 5600 ft, 17 May 1969, LTN (UCLA 650), 5M,3F
[UCLA-UTAH]. Escalante River at Hwy. 12, 5000 ft, 16 May 1969, LTN (UCLA 649), 9 M,
20 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Jron Co.: Parowan (2 mi S), 6000 ft, 24 Oct 1971, HA (UCLA 676), 7 M,
13 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Kane Co.: Cottonwood Canyon, 22 mi N Hwy. 89, 5000 ft, 26 May
1970 (UCLA 683), 30 M, 49 F, 3 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Orderville, 5460 ft, 25 Mar 1969, HA,
LTN (UCLA 677), 3 IpM (677-13,15,18), 5 lpF (677-11,14,16,17,19), 1 M, 1 F [UCLA-UTAH].
Millard Co.: Oak City (4 mi E), 5900 ft, 20 Aug 1969, LTN (UCLA 651), 3 IpM (651-12,16,18),
3 IpF (651-11,15,17), 1 lp (651-20), 3 M, 15 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Piute Co.: Junction (2 mi W),
7000 ft, 23 Aug 1969, LTN (UCLA 652), 1 IpM (652-16), 5 IpF (652-11,12,15,17,18), 1 Ip
(652-19), 5 M, 24 F [UCLA- UTAH]. Marysvale (1 mi W), 5900 ft, 26 May 1970, HA, LIN,
RN (UCLA 684), 3 IpM (684-12,17,20), 4 IpF (684-11,13,15,19) [UCLA-UTAH] . Utah Co.:
Provo (4 mi N), 4680 ft, 4 Oct 1970, HA (UCLA 698), 2 IpM (698-15-18), 6 IpF (698-12-14,
16,17,19), 6 M, 16 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Washington Co.: Beaver Dam Wash, 2 mi N Motoqua,
4350 ft, 8 Nov 1967, HA, LTN (UCLA 656), 2 M, 3 F [UCLA-UTAH]. Virgin (4.6 mi N),
4000 ft, 25 Mar 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA 673), 2 IpM (673-14,18), 8 IpF (673-11-13,15-17,19,
20), 27 M, 69 F, 12 P, 45 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Leeds, 2750 ft, 25 Mar 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA
674), 2 IpM (674-15,17), 8 IpF (674-11-14,16,18-20), 22 M, 59 F, 24 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Pine
Valley (3 mi E), 6000 ft, 3 June 1970, RN (UCLA 691), 3 IpF (691-13,16,18), 2M,9 F,6P,9L
[UCLA-UTAH]. Zion Natl. Park (Springdale entrance), 3950 ft, 31 Dec 1966, TJZ (UCLA 415),
2 IpM (415-10,11), 2 IpF (415-12,13), 4 L [UCLA]. Zion Natl. Park (Visitor’s Center), 3950 ft,
25 Mar 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA 678), 1 lpM (678-13), 4 lpF (678-11,12,14,18) [UCLA-UTAH] .
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 21
HYBRIDS. Hybrids between varipalpus and monticola are known only from Oak
Creek Canyon, Coconino County, Arizona. For discussion see under systematics
above. Material examined: 65 specimens; 4 males, 22 females, 23 larvae, 16 pu-
pae; 11 individual larval rearings.
UNITED STATES
Arizona. Coconino Co.: Oak Creek Canyon, Slide Rock Campground, 4800 ft, 24 May 1970,
HA, LTN, RN (UCLA 681), 2 IpM (681-14,18), 4 IpF (681-11,13,15,17), 4 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Oak Creek Canyon, Manzanita Campground, 4700 ft, 24 May 1970, HA, LTN, RN (UCLA
682), 1 IpM (682-21), 4 IpF (682-13,17,24,25), 1 M, 14 F, 5 P, 8 L [UCLA-UTAH].
4. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) deserticola Zavortink
Figs. 1,2,10,11
1970. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) deserticola Zavortink, 1970:1-7. TYPE: Holotype male (UCLA
516-32) with associated larval and pupal skins, Littlerock (5 mi SW), San Gabriel Moun-
tains, Los Angeles Co., California, U.S.A., 4 Feb 1969, T.J. Zavortink [USNM].
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 3.75 mm. Proboscis: 2.20 mm. Forefemur: 1.82 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.90 mm. Head: Erect scales yellow on vertex; numerous dark
erect scales laterally. Proboscis entirely dark scaled. Palpus with a few white scales
on apex of segment 1. Thorax: Mesonotum with broad patch of narrow golden
scales from anterior promontory to near prescutellar space, scale patch relatively
sparse, especially just laterad of acrostichal line; outer posterior dorsocentral line
of white and yellow scales with golden scales anteriorly; patches between outer
posterior dorsocentral line and supraalar line golden and yellow posteriorly. Acros-
tichal bristles dark. White scale patches on pleuron relatively small, setae reduced;
ppn entirely white scaled, scales more numerous posteroventrally, 4-8 mixed light
and dark setae posteriorly; ppl with about 10-15 light setae; ssp without setae;
pcx without scales; lower mep with small, compact scale patch in center of scle-
rite; metameron without scales. Hindtarsal segment 1 with broad basal and apical
white rings, white scales occupying about 0.4 of segment; hindtarsal segment 4
with occasional white scales basally and apically. Wing with white scales at base
of C reduced.
MALE. Wing: 2.95 mm. Proboscis: 2.30 mm. Forefemur: 1.70 mm. Abdomen:
about 2.75 mm. Proboscis with ventral white streak on basal 0.5, usually extend-
ing dorsally to form white ring from basal 0.3-0.5. Palpus without white scales
Over joint between segments 2 and 3.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 10). Segment IX: Tergite lobe with 4-6 (2-7) setae.
Sidepiece: Length 4.0 of width at middle; lateral 0.33 of dorsal surface with strong
bristles and scales, mesal 0.67 of dorsal surface with short bristles, becoming strong-
er toward apex; tergomesal margin bare; basal tergomesal lobe with single strongly
differentiated, apically curved seta and 1-3 long, slender bristles; length of dif-
ferentiated seta about 30.0 of width at base. Claspette: Stem moderately curved,
length 8.0 of width; filament slightly longer than stem, flattened beyond mid-
dle, sharply recurved at apex; connection between claspettes declivous mesally.
Clasper: Strongly curved apically; spiniform about 0.3 of clasper length.
PUPA (fig. 10). Abdomen: 3.37 mm. Trumpet: 0.43 mm. Paddle: 0.79 mm.
Cephalothorax: Light yellowish-brown; trumpet light amber; metanotum light yel-
lowish-brown. Abdomen: Light yellowish-brown. Hair 1-II usually double; 1-[I-V
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
subequal. Hair 5-III subequal to 1-III and weaker than 3-III. Hairs 5-I[V-VI strong-
ly developed, subequal. Hair 7-V usually double. Paddle: Apex emarginate; length
1.4-1.6 of width.
LARVA (fig. 11). Head: 0.76 mm. Siphon: 0.70 mm. Saddle: 0.22 mm. Tho-
rax: Integument unpigmented, living larva white. Hair 7-P usually double (2,3b).
Abdomen: Integument as on thorax. Hair 1-II stronger than 13-I]; hairs 1,13-
IlI-V subequal, usually double, with lateral branch longer than medial branch.
Hair 6 usually double on segments I-V, single on VI. Hairs 7-I,1] moderately de-
veloped, subequal to or weaker than hair 10 on corresponding segment. Hair 12-
I present. Segment VIII: Hair 1 usually single (1-3b); hair 3 usually double (1,
2b). Comb scales 7-12 (5-15), in single or irregular double row. Siphon: Index
2.2-2.4 (2.1-2.5); slightly inflated, broadest at level of hair 1-S, sharply reduced
in diameter apically. Pecten teeth 7-11 (4-13); restricted to basal 0.2 of siphon.
Hair 1-S triple, 0.25-0.30 from base of siphon. Anal Segment: Hair 1-X usually
single (1,2b). Gills 4.0-5.0 (3.8-5.5) of saddle length.
SYSTEMATICS. Adults of deserticola differ markedly from the other members
of the group in the reduction of the size of the scale patches on the pleuron,
the scales being more appressed, and in the reduction in the number of pleural
setae. The male genitalia are very similar to laguna and monticola with 3 or few-
er stout bristles in addition to 1 differentiated seta on the basal tergomesal lobe
of the sidepiece, but can be distinguished by the relatively greater stoutness of
the differentiated seta, the length being about 25-30 times the basal diameter,
and the relatively few (4-6) setae on the lobe of the ninth tergite. The pupa of
deserticola is entirely light yellowish-brown without darker areas dorsally as in
varipalpus and monticola. Hair 3-III is generally stronger than 1-III or 5-HI. The
larva of deserticola is unpigmented and hair 12-I is present. It can also be dis-
tinguished by single hairs 1-VIII and 1-X and fewer comb scales (7-11) than in
the other species.
BIONOMICS. Little is known of the habits of deserticola. The larvae have been
collected in treeholes in sycamores (Platanus racemosa), cottonwoods (Populus fre-
montii), live oak (Quercus engelmannii, Q. wislizenii) and scrub oak (Q. turbinella),
and in association with sierrensis and Orthopodomyia signifera. In the Little San
Bernardino Mountains, deserticola has been taken from scrub oak holes less than
1 cm in diameter and holding less than 20 ml of water. In 2 instances larvae
were removed from rotholes to which the only opening was the gallery of a beetle
larva. When larvae of deserticola and sierrensis were reared together in the labor-
atory, the rate of development of deserticola was much slower, but it is not known
whether deserticola is competitively inferior to sierrensis or has an intrinsically
slower growth rate. Nothing is known of the habits of the adults.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes deserticola is known from the western portions
of the Mojave and Colorado Deserts, the interior slopes of the Transverse and Pen-
insular ranges and the Little San Bernardino Mountains. Material examined: 1703
specimens; 216 males, 203 females, 951 larvae, 333 pupae; 169 individual rear-
ings (155 larval, 14 incomplete).
UNITED STATES
California. Los Angeles Co.: Mt. Emma Rd., 1 mi E Angeles Forest Hwy., 21 Mar 1969, HA,
TJZ, LTN (HA-2-69), 1 IpM (4), 4 M, 17 F [UTAH]. Littlerock (5 mi SW), 4 Apr 1964, TJZ
(UCLA 503), 3 M, 5 F, 144 L [UCLA]; same data, 4 Feb 1969 (UCLA 516), 2 lpM (516-10,34),
17 IpF (516-35-51), 1 lp (516-31), 17 M, 38 P, 85 L [UCLA]; same data (F; gen. from lab
colony) (UCLA 516A), 4 IpM (516A-11-14), 7 IpF (516A-10,16-20,22), 2 Ip (516A-21,23), 51M,
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 23
53 F [UCLA]; same data (F2 gen. from lab colony) (UCLA 516B), 8 lpM (516B-10,11,13-18),
2 Ip (516B-12,19), 240 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 517), 4 IpM (517-30,31,33,34), 17 IpF
(517-35-39,41-43,45-53), 1 lp (517-40), 18 M, 14 F, 39 P, 102 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA
522), 4 lpM (522-10-13), 4 lpF (522-15-17,19), 11 M, 4 F, 13 P, 8 L [UCLA]. Pearblossom (8
mi SE), 4 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 518), 2 IpM (518-21,25), 3 IpF (518-28-30), 8 L [UCLA];
same data, 12 Mar 1969, TJZ, DWH (UCLA 530), 1 IpM (530-12), 4 IpF (530-10,11,14,15), 1 M,
1 F, 2 P, 1 L [UCLA]. Riverside Co.: Anza (11 mi E, Santa Rosa Mts.), 6700 ft, 20 July 1970,
TJZ (UCLA 574), 1 lpM (574-21) [UCLA]. Joshua Tree Natl. Mon., Juniper Flats, 4900-5100
ft, 17 Mar 1969, TJZ, DWH (UCLA 539), 18 IpM (539-10-27), 5 IpF (539-28-32), 15 M, 12 F,
32 P, 119 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 545), 4 IpM (545-10,11,16,17), 3 IpF (545-14,18,19),
3 Ip (545-12,13,15), 2 M, 4 F, 6 P, 4 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 546), 2 IpM (546-10,12),
1 IpF (546-14), 3 Ip (546-11,13,15) [UCLA]. Joshua Tree Natl. Mon., Hidden Valley, 20 May
1946, A.L. Melander, 1 F [USNM]. San Bernardino Co.: Yucca Valley (6.5 mi NW), 4400 ft,
18 Mar 1969, TJZ, DWH (UCLA 544), 3 lpM (544-10,11,13), 2 IpF (544-14,15), 1 lp (544-12)
[UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 548), 1 lpM (548-13), 4 IpF (548-10-12,14) [UCLA]. Yucca Valley
(9 mi NW), 4600 ft, 18 Mar 1969, TJZ, DWH (UCLA 547), 1 L [UCLA]. San Diego Co.:
Banner Canyon (5 mi E Julian), 12 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 527), 13 lpM (527-23-25,27-32,34,
37-39), 15 IpF (527-22,26,33,35,36,40-49), 24 M, 7 F, 34 P, 71 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA
528), 2 IpM (528-20,21), 3 IpF (528-22,24,25), 1 lp (528-23) [UCLA].
5. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) sierrensis (Ludlow)
Figs13242,13
1905. Taeniorhynchus sierrensis Ludlow, 1905:231-232. TYPE: Lectotype female, Three Rivers,
Sierra Nevada (Tulare Co.), California, U.S.A., E.J. Bingham [USNM; designation by
Stone and Knight, 1956:225].
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) sierrensis of Belkin and McDonald (1957:191); Myers (1967:805); Zavortink
(1970:1); Lunt and Nielsen (1971:110).
Aedes varipalpus of Dyar (1907:125; 1917a:18; 1917b:99; 1919:39; 1920a:19); Howard, Dyar
and Knab (1913:plates 31,75); Matheson (1929:139,233); Reeves (1940:39); Stage, Gjullin
and Yates (1952:60,74).
Aedes sierrensis of Nielsen, Linam and Rees (1963:426); Nielsen, Arnell and Linam (1967:75);
Nielsen, Linam, Arnell and Zavortink (1968:362).
Aedes (Finlaya) sierrensis of Rohlf (1963:802); Trebatoski and Haynes (1969:332); Cupp and
Horsfall (1969:51).
Aedes varipalpus in part of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:644); Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:
39); Peyton (1956:220); Richards, Nielsen and Rees (1956:14).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus of Matheson (1944:188,291).
Aedes (Finlaya) varipalpus in part of Edwards (1932:154); Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:257).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) varipalpus of Dyar (1918:74; 1920b:171; 1928:214,524); Hearle (1926:
53). :
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) varipalpus in part of Dyar (1918:74; 1922:86).
Aedes (Culicelsa) varipalpus of Freeborn (1926:416).
Grabhamia varipalpus of Dyar (1905a:48; 1905b:53).
Culex varipalpus of Dyar (1904a:39; 1904b:90); Blaisdell (1906:107).
Culicada varipalpus of Felt (1905:447).
Taeniorhynchus (?) sierronsis of Theobald (1910:432).
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 3.50 mm. Proboscis: 2.30 mm. Forefemur: 1.75 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.85 mm. Head: Erect scales yellow on vertex, dark laterally.
Proboscis entirely dark scaled or occasionally with scattered white scales ventral-
ly. Palpus often with a few white scales on apex of segment 1. Thorax: Meso-
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
notum with broad, dense patch of narrow golden scales from anterior promon-
tory to near prescutellar space or with narrow line of golden scales along acros-
tichal line from anterior promontory to near prescutellar space, golden scales be-
ing reduced in number laterad to acrostichal line but forming indistinct line just
mesad to anterior dorsocentral line; lateral prescutal white scales relatively sparse;
outer posterior dorsocentral line broad anteriorly, composed mostly of white scales
with a few golden scales, narrowed posteriorly and composed of yellow scales;
patches between outer posterior dorsocentral line and supraalar line relatively in-
conspicuous, golden anteriorly, white or yellow posteriorly. Acrostichal bristles
dark. Pleural setae reduced; ppn with narrow dark scales anteriorly and broader
white scales in sparse patch posteriorly, scales becoming more dense posteroven-
trally, 5-8 mixed light and dark setae posteriorly; ppl with 10-15 light setae; ssp
without setae; pcx without scales; lower mep scale patch compact, scales not reach-
ing ventral 0.33 of sclerite. Hindtarsal segment 1 with broad basal and apical white
rings, white scales occupying 0.4 of segment; hindtarsal segment 4 with broad
ring of white scales on basal 0.3 of segment and a few white scales apically. Wing
with white scales on base of C reduced.
MALE. Wing: 2.80 mm. Proboscis: 2.25 mm. Forefemur: 1.65 mm. Abdomen:
about 2.55 mm. Proboscis entirely dark scaled or often, in specimens with white
scales over joint between palpal segments 2 and 3, with scattered white scales
ventrally from basal 0.25-0.60, these rarely forming indistinct ring. Palpus with
or without white scales over joint between segments 2 and 3.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 12). Segment [X: Tergite lobe with 4-7 (2-9) setae.
Sidepiece: Length 3.0 of width at middle; basal 0.75 of dorsal surface covered
with short bristles, apical 0.25 with strong bristles; tergomesal margin with num-
erous short, stout bristles; basal tergomesal lobe with dense patch of strongly de-
veloped, apically curved setae. Claspette: Stem moderately curved, length 4.0 of
width; filament slightly longer than stem, bluntly recurved at apex; connection
between claspettes nearly horizontal but with median emargination. Clasper: Slight-
ly curved apically; spiniform 0.25 of clasper length.
PUPA (fig. 12). Abdomen: 3.25 mm. Trumpet: 0.44 mm. Paddle: 0.83 mm.
Cephalothorax: Light brown, darker dorsally; trumpet amber; metanotum light
brown, haltere cases lighter. Abdomen: Light brown, anterior segments darker,
especially mesally. Hair 1-II usually double; 1-IV usually slightly stronger than
1-III and 1-V. Hair 5-III subequal to 1-IIJ and weaker than 3-III. Hair 5-VI weak-
er than 5-IV,V which are subequal. Hair 7-V usually double. Paddle: Apex emar-
ginate, occasionally rounded; length 1.6-1.8 of width.
LARVA (fig. 13). Head: 0.82 mm. Siphon: 0.83 mm. Saddle: 0.28 mm. Tho-
rax: Integument pigmented, living larva gray in color. Hair 7-P usually double,
rarely triple. Abdomen: Integument as on thorax. Hair 1 weaker and with more
branches than hair 13 on segments IIJ-V. Hair 6 double (2,3b) on segments I-IV,
double on V and single on VI. Hairs 7-I,II moderately developed, subequal to
or weaker than hair 10 on corresponding segment. Hair 12-I present. Segment
VI: Hair 1 usually 4b (2-5); hair 3 usually 4b (3-5). Comb scales 14-20 (7-24),
in irregular double or triple row. Siphon: Index 2.7-3.3; sides nearly parallel, not
sharply reduced in diameter apically. Pecten teeth 12-14 (8-19); restricted to basal
0.30 (0.23-0.30) of siphon. Hair 1-S usually triple (3,4b), 0.35-0.40 from base
of siphon. Anal Segment: Hair 1-X usually double (1-3b). Gills 3.0-4.0 of saddle
length.
SYSTEMATICS. Adults of sierrensis differ from the remaining members of the
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 25
group primarily in the reduction of pleural setae, the broad basal white ring on
hindtarsal segment 4, the absence of the ventral white streak on the male pro-
boscis, and the male genitalia. The sidepiece of the male genitalia is relatively
short and stout; the basal 0.75 of the dorsal surface is covered with short hairs
(the remaining members of the group have long hairs and scales on the lateral
0.33 of the dorsal surface); the tergomesal margin has numerous short, strong
hairs (bare in the remaining species); and the basal tergomesal lobe is charact-
erized by a dense patch of strongly developed setae (in contrast to the single
strong seta of the other members of the group). The clasper of sierrensis is rel-
atively short and not strongly curved apically and the claspette is relatively short
and thick. The pupa of sierrensis differs from the remaining members of the group
in the shape of the paddle; the dark pigmentation of the abdomen on the first
4 or 5 segments; hair 3-III stronger than 1-III or 5-III, 1-IV stronger than 1-III,V,
and 5-VI weaker than 5-IV,V. The larva of sierrensis is pigmented and light gray
in color. Hair 12-I is present. It shows a slight reduction in the development of
some setae, primarily hairs 1,13-I-V and 7-I,II, an increase in the number of comb
scales (usually 14-20) and a relatively long, narrow siphon.
There is considerable variation in the ornamentation of the adults of sierrensis.
Southern populations are characterized by the presence of a white patch of scales
over the joint between segments 2 and 3 of the male palpus. All material ex-
amined from the Transverse and Peninsular Mountain Ranges of southern Califor-
nia exhibit this character and in collections from the South Coast Range of San
Luis Obispo and southern Monterey Counties some males lack the patch and others
have a small one. All material from northern Monterey County, the San Joaquin
Valley and the Sierra Nevada (including the Tehachapi Range) is without the white
scale patch. The density of the. golden scales on the anterior mesonotum is an
extremely variable character in sierrensis, ranging from a uniformly very dense
condition to a reduction in golden scales just laterad of the acrostichal line which
results in 3 golden stripes rather than a broad golden patch. The latter condition
approaches that found in laguna. A reduction in golden scales is common in sier-
rensis from the eastern Transverse Ranges and Peninsular Ranges of California,
and is found, although to a limited extent, in specimens from throughout the
entire range of the species.
Much of the present distribution of sierrensis has occurred in relatively recent
geological time. Most of the area of the present northern and eastern range of
sierrensis was glaciated during the most recent Pleistocene glacial advance when
the Cordilleran Ice Sheet pushed southward from Canada covering much of the
northern Rocky Mountains west of the Continental Divide, much of the Colum-
bia Plateau and the coastal mountain ranges of British Columbia, Washington and
Oregon. This area must then have been invaded by sierrensis since the Pleisto-
cene, probably within the last 15,000 to 20,000 years. The northern Utah popu-
lation of sierrensis is located in the Great Basin with no drainage connection
to the Columbia system. It is probable that sierrensis invaded the Great Basin
at the maximum extent of Lake Bonneville, a pluvial lake covering the eastern
Great Basin, when there was an outlet to the Snake River in southeastern Idaho.
BIONOMICS. Females of sierrensis are avid biters of humans in central and
northern California, constituting a major pest species in localized areas and the
object of control programs. However there is some evidence that populations of
sierrensis in Utah, southern California and British Columbia are not readily at-
tracted to humans. Nothing is known of the natural hosts for this species other
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
than man, although in the laboratory it will readily feed on rabbits and chickens.
Aedes sierrensis has been shown to be capable of transmitting Western Equine
Encephalitis under laboratory conditions (Stage, Gjullin and Yates, 1952). Mating
usually occurs near the host. Males of sierrensis are attracted to the host animal
where they await the arrival of females and mating takes place in the air or while
the females are taking a blood meal.
Larvae of sierrensis are found exclusively in treeholes or situations resembling
treeholes. They seem to have no preference for any particular species of tree and
are found wherever suitable treeholes form. In the extensive forests and wood-
lands of the Pacific Coast, sierrensis is found in a wide variety of trees, but in
the eastern, more arid regions of its range, it is found exclusively in riverine sit-
uations in cottonwood (Populus). Aedes sierrensis has been collected in associ-
ation with deserticola and Orthopodomyia signifera in California and with Aedes
hendersoni Cockrell, 1918 in British Columbia, Montana and eastern Oregon.
Eggs are laid singly on the sides of treeholes above the water line. Hatching
occurs when water in the treeholes rises to flood the eggs, although there is evi-
dence that eggs may drop off the sides of the hole into the water. As in the
case with the other members of the Varipalpus Group and treehole aedines in
general, not all eggs hatch the first time they are flooded, some hatching only
after repeated wetting and drying. Judson, Hokama and Kliewer (1966) in studies
on the embryogeny and hatching of sierrensis eggs determined that 9-15 days are
required for embryonation and that the egg had an uncommonly thick chorion
and serosal cuticle. A strong hatching stimulus, an unusually low level of dissolved
oxygen, was shown to be necessary for eclosion. Eggs will hatch at very low tem-
peratures as Arnell has observed first instar larvae in treeholes nearly filled with
ice. The rate of larval development varies with temperature with complete devel-
opment from egg to adult varying from as little as 14 days or as long as several
months. Larvae hatched by early fall rains in California will often not pupate in
significant numbers until early spring. This period of dormancy is apparently re-
lated to photoperiod as changes in temperature under laboratory conditions fail
to have any effect. Cold temperatures apparently retard pupation. In Utah, no
pupae of sierrensis have been found later than October when water temperatures
drop below approximately 50° F, even though larvae have been found through-
out the winter in treeholes covered with several inches of ice and with water tem-
peratures as low as 30° F. Pupation begins almost immediately after these larvae
are brought into the laboratory and the water temperature is raised. In the milder
climates of the Pacific Coast larvae are unable to survive prolonged periods of
freezing temperatures.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes sierrensis has the most extensive range of all
the members of the group. It has been collected throughout the Pacific Coast
drainage systems from southern California to British Columbia including Montana
and Idaho, the desert margins of southern California, the eastern slope of the
Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada and the Great Basin in northern Utah.
Material examined: 10,504 specimens; 1904 males, 1433 females, 5014 larvae,
2153 pupae; 637 individual rearings (505 larval, 107 pupal, 25 incomplete).
CANADA
British Columbia. Caulfeild, 19 July 1919, Eric Hearle, 3 F [USNM]. Harrison, 20 June
1919, Eric Hearle, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]. Karemos (4 mi W), 4 Aug 1968, LTN (UCLA 647), 3 M,
4 F, 6 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Kaslo, 13 June 1903, H.G. Dyar, 17M, 14 F,1P,8L,E [USNM] ;
same data, Apr 1904, 5 L [USNM]. Kelowna, 3 Aug 1968, LTN (UCLA 646), 2 M,4F, 2 L
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 2a
(UCLA: UTAH]. Kootenay Lake (S end), 1 Aug 1968, LTN (UCLA 645), 7 F, 2 L [UCLA-
UTAH]. Mara Lake, 2 Aug 1968, LTN (UCLA 648), 2 M,5 F, 1 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Mission,
14 July 1920, H.G. Dyar, 1 F [USNM]. Nanaimo, 6 Aug 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 2 M, 2 F
[USNM]. Terrace, 13-14 Aug 1919, H.G. Dyar, 6 M, 28 F [USNM]. Vancouver (Stanley Park),
6 Aug 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 1 M [USNM]. Vancouver Island, 8 Aug, K. Taylor, 5 M, 10 F
[USNM]. Victoria, 12 Aug 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 3 F sniieiadl Wellington, 8 Aug 1906,
Dyar and Caudell, 2 F [USNM].
‘UNITED STATES
California. Alameda Co.: Berkeley, 16 Mar 1950, R.E. Ryckman, 3 F [USNM]. Oakland,
20 Mar 1940, H.F. Gray, 5 L [UCLA]. Sunol, Dec 1947, W.W. Wirth, 2 P, 57 L [USNM]; same
data, 4 Feb 1948, 34 L [USNM] ; same data, 24 Mar 1949, 4 M [USNM] . Alpine Co.: Markleeville,
5526 ft, 22 June 1970, LTN, RN, S.J. Carpenter (HA-17-70), 1 M, 3 F, 4 P, 6 L [UTAH].
El Dorado Co.: El Dorado Hills (2.5 mi E), 1000 ft, 5 May 1970, HA, RN (UCLA 680), 3 lpM
(680-16,19,20), 6 IpF (680-12,15,17,18) [UCLA-UTAH]. Kyburz (3 mi W), 4950 ft, 20 June
1970, LIN, RN (UCLA 692), 4 lpF (692-14,15,17,20), 1 Ip (692-19), 2 M, 6 F, 7 L [UCLA-
UTAH]. Placerville, 1900 ft, 21 June 1970, LTN, RN (UCLA 693), 1 IpM (693-19), 4 IpF
(693-13,14,16,18), 6 M, 3 F, 6 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Fresno Co.: Fresno, 13 Apr 1953, 1M
[USNM]. Kearney Park, 22 Apr 1954, 1 M [USNM]. Kings Canyon, 9 July 1955, R.X. Schick,
1 F [UCLA]. Humboldt Co.: Bair’s Ranch, Redwood Cr., 11 June 1903, H.S. Barber, 2 M, 1 F
[USNM]. Eureka, 3 June 1903, H.S. Barber, 1 M [USNM]. Fieldbrook, 30 May 1903, HLS.
Barber, 7 M, 2 F [USNM]. Orleans, Dillon Creek, 3 Sept 1933, CCC Survey, 8 F [USNM].
Prairie Creek, 10 Aug 1948, W.W. Wirth, 1 M [USNM]. Richardson, 23 July 1954, A.L. Melander,
6 M, 2 F [USNM]. Willow Creek (3-4 mi W), 9 Sept 1950, J.N. Belkin (UCLA 72), 3 F [UCLA].
Kern Co.: Bakersfield, 12 May 1948, D. Brockman, 1 F [UCLA]; same data, 26 May 1948, 5 F
' [UCLA]. Bakersfield (6 mi NW), 26 May 1948, W.C. Reeves, 4 F [UCLA]. Tehachapi (7.3 mi
SE), 7 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 525), 5 IpM (525-10-14), 5 lpF (525-15-19), 1 M, 3 P, 3 L
[UCLA]. Locality unknown, 26 May 1948, W.C. Reeves, A. Rudnick, 6 F [UCLA]. Los Angeles
Co.: Acton (6 mi SW), 11 Dec 1965, TJZ (UCLA 508), 2 L [UCLA]. Agoura, 17 May 1952,
McDonald, 1 F [UCLA]. Claremont, Baker, 2 F [USNM]. Gorman (10.6 mi E, 1.8 mi NNW
Hwy. 138), 7 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 523), 1 lpF (523-10), 3 M, 3 P, 2 L [UCLA]. Littlerock
(5 mi SW), 4 Apr 1964, TJZ (UCLA 503), 1 M, 3 F, 42 L [UCLA]; same data, 4 Feb 1969
(UCLA 516), 1 lpM (516-28), 18 IpF (516-11,13-27,29,30), 53 M, 26 F, 87 P, 90 L [UCLA];
same data (UCLA 517), 6 IpM (517-10-15), 14 IpF (517-16-29), 60 M, 99 F, 166 P, 83 L
[UCLA]; same data (UCLA 522), 2 IpF (522-14,18), 4 F, 5 P, 3 L [UCLA]. Los Angeles,
1 Feb 1950, G. Heid, 1 M, 1 F, 1 L [UCLA]. Malibu Canyon, 3 Mar 1955, J.N. Belkin (UCLA
158), 1 IpM (158-112), 4 IpF (158-113,116,118,119), 21 M, 1 F, 3 P, 23 L [UCLA]; same data
25 Mar 1956, W.A. McDonald, 1 L [UCLA]. Mt. Emma Road, 1 mi E Angeles Forest Hwy.,
21 Mar 1969, HA, LTN, TJZ (HA-2-69), 5 lpM (3,5,8,9,12), 8 IpF (1,6,7,10,11,13-15), 2 M, 33 F
[UTAH]. Pasadena, Arroyo Seco, 22 May 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 2 F [USNM]. Pearblossom
(4 mi SE), 3600 ft, 12 Mar 1969, TJZ (UCLA 533), 1 lpM (533-10), 146 L [UCLA] ; same data
(UCLA 532), 18 L [UCLA]. Pearblossom (4.5 mi SE), 3700 ft, 12 Mar 1969, TJZ (UCLA 531),
1 IpM (531-10), 1 IpF (531-11), 34 L [UCLA]. Pearblossom (5 mi SE), 4 Feb 1969, TJZ
(UCLA 518), 1 IpM (518-13), 15 IpF (518-10-12,14-20,22-24,26,27), 58 M, 17 F, 70 P, 81 L
[UCLA]; same data (UCLA 519), 12 lpM (519-10-13,15,17,18,21-23,25,29), 8 IpF (519-14,16,
19,20,24,26-28), 262 M, 51 F, 347 P, 864 L [UCLA]. Pearblossom (6.5 mi SE), 4100 ft, 12 Mar
1969, TJZ (UCLA 530), 1 IpF (530-13), 159 L [UCLA]. San Gabriel River, 29 June 1915,
C.F. Adams, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]. Santa Monica Mts., Fall 1951, 17 P [UCLA]; same data,
11 Mar 1954, 3 L [UCLA]; same data, 2 Mar 1957, J. Pumphrey, 14 M, 10 F [UCLA]; same
data, 12 Apr 1957, Bimantoro, 6 M [UCLA]. Sepulveda Canyon, 3 Mar 1956, W.A. McDonald
(UCLA 182), 4 M, 2 F, 31 P [UCLA]. Soledad Canyon, 20 Mar 1955, W.A. McDonald (UCLA
162), 4 IpM (162-109,125,135,137), 7 IpF (162-100-114,126,128), 18 pM (162-101-105,107,
115-119,121,123,124,130,132-134), 5 pF (162-106,108,120,122,131), 1 M, 12 P, 5 L [UCLA].
Tapia Park, 11 Mar 1954, 5 L [UCLA]; same data, 7 May 1954, 35 P, 7 L [UCLA]; same data,
4 Apr 1954, J.N. Belkin (UCLA 102), 1 lpM (102-104), 13 IpF (102-101,102,105-108,110-116),
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
1 lp (102-103), 1 L [UCLA]; same data, 7 Apr 1954, J.N. Belkin and W.A. McDonald, 3 L
[UCLA]; same data, 19 Oct 1963, TJZ (UCLA 417), 4 IpM (417-10,13,15,19), 5 IpF (417-12,
14,16-18), 10 M, 2 F, 9 L [UCLA]; same data, 17 Dec 1963 (UCLA 491), 4 M, 3 F [UCLA];
same data (UCLA 489), 3 M, 3 F [UCLA]; same data, 2 Dec 1967 (UCLA 433), 2 IpM (433-
12,14), 15 lpF (433-11,13,14,16-20,22-24,26,29), 3 Ip (433-10,20,25), 101 M, 34 F, 150 P,
665 L [UCLA]. Westwood Hills, 1 Feb 1950, 13 M, 4 F [UCLA]; same data, 6 May 1955, C.
Blodgett, 1 F [UCLA]. Locality unknown, 22 Mar 1952, 19 L [UCLA]. Marin Co.: Ft. Baker,
6 Apr 1953, Schuessler, 1 M, 4 F [UCLA]. Mill Valley, CCC Survey, 3 F [USNM]. Muir Woods
State Park, 24 Feb 1952, 1 F [UCLA]. Mariposa Co.: El Portal, 12 May 1916, H.G. Dyar, 1 F
[USNM]. Yosemite, 16 May 1916, H.G. Dyar, 71 M, 23 F [USNM]. Yosemite Natl. Park, S
entrance, 4800 ft, 13 Sept 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA 668), 1 M [UCLA]. Yosemite Natl. Park,
Yosemite Valley, 21 July 1954, W.A. McDonald, 1 F [UCLA]. Mendocino Co,: Orr’s Hot Springs,
July 1921, Dorothy Dyar, 1 M [USNM]. Monterey Co.: Hunter-Liggett Mil. Res., W boundary,
20 mi W Lockwood, 1600 ft, 27 Oct 1971, HA (UCLA 590), 5 IpM (590-13-15,24,27), 13 IpF
(590-10-12,16-19,21-23,25,26,29), 2 lp (590-20,28), 11 M, 25 P, 40 L [UCLA]. Toro Regional
Park, 5 mi W Salinas, 50 ft, 27 Oct 1971, HA (UCLA 589), 9 IpM (589-14,16,17,19,21,24,25,
28,29), 11 lpF (589-10-13,15,18,20,22,23,26,27), 1 lp (589-22), 10 M, 1 F, 26 P, 121 L [UCLA].
Napa Co.: Bothe-Napa Valley State Park, 500 ft, 16 Sept 1969, HA, LTN, S.J. Carpenter (UCLA
670), 2 lpM (670-15,16), 8 IpF (670-11-14,17-20), 14 M, 36 F, 12 P, 26 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Orange Co.: Irvine Park, 24 June 1949, 1 M, 3 F [UCLA]. Los Alamitos, 4 July 1949,3 M,6F
[UCLA]. Placer Co.: Auburn, 20 Oct 1918, L. Bruner, 1 F [USNM]. Lake Tahoe, 15 Aug 1915,
H.G. Dyar, 1 M, 2 F [USNM]. Plumas Co.: Chester, July 1957, C.L. Hogue, 1 F [UCLA].
Riverside Co.: Aguanga (7 mi NW), 3 Feb 1966, TJZ (UCLA 292), 6 IpM (292-10-12,15,16,20),
3 IpF (292-14,18,19), 16 pM (292-30,31,100,102-114), 24 M, 5 F, 34 P, 80 L [UCLA]. Anza
(11 mi E, Santa Rosa Mts.), 6700 ft, 20 July 1970, TJZ (UCLA 574), 1 pM (574-20) [UCLA].
Elsinore (11 mi SW), 12 Feb 1964, TJZ (UCLA 501), 1 lpM (501-10), 3 M, 1 F, 2 L [UCLA].
Idyllwild, 30 May 1939, 1 F [UCLA]; same data, 18 June 1952, 1 F [UCLA]. Idyllwild (11.5 mi
N), 5000 ft, 2 Nov 1971, HA (UCLA 592), 8 lpM (592-10,15,17,21-23,28,29), 10 IpM (592-12-14,
16,18-20,24-26), 2 Ip (592-11,27), 42 M, 8 F, 57 P, 123 L [UCLA]. Banning (6 mi S), 4000 ft,
2 Nov 1971, HA (UCLA 591), 8 IpM (591-14,15,18,19,22,23,27,29), 11 IpF (591-10-13,16,17,21,
24-26,28), 1 lp (591-20), 8M, 8 P, 14 L [UCLA]. San Jacinto Mts., 1 July 1952, J.F. Powers, 2 F
[UCLA]. Fern Basin, San Jacinto Mts., 15 June 1940, C.D. Michener, 1 F [UCLA]. Sacramento
Co.: Sacramento, 12 Apr 1948, R.M. Bohart, 1 M [USNM]. San Bernardino Co,: Cajon Jct. (1 mi
E), 4 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 520), 1 lpM (520-16), 9 IpF (520-10-15,17-19), 13 M, 1 F, 10 P, 52 L
[UCLA]. Crestline (4 mi NW), 4 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 521), 2 IpM (521-11,14), 8 IpF (521-10,
12,13,15-19), 37 M, 5 F, 48 P, 113 L [UCLA]. San Diego Co.: Banner Canyon, 5 mi E Julian,
12 Feb 1969, TJZ (UCLA 526), 4 M, 5 P, 5 L [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 527), 5 IpM (527-10,
12-14,17), 6 lpF (527-15,16,18-21), 1 lp (527-11), 76 M, 8 F, 87 P, 505 L [UCLA]; same data
(UCLA 528), 4 IpM (528-10-12,14), 6 IpF (528-13,15-19), 11 M, 2 F, 14 P, 91 L [UCLA] ; same
data (UCLA 529), 8 IpM (529-10-14,17-19), 2 lpF (529-15,16), 29 M, 1 F, 36 P, 136 L [UCLA].
Barrett Jct., 1 Feb 1966, TJZ (UCLA 287), 6 L [UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 288), 3 IpM (288-10,
12,15), 2 lpF (288-13,14), 1 lp (288-11) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 289), 2 IpM (289-11,15),
9 IpF (289-10,12-14,16-20), 14 pM (289-100-113), 2 L [UCLA]. Bonsall, 12 Feb 1964, TJZ (UCLA
498), 10 M, 4 F [UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 499), 2 F [UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 513), 19 M, 11 F,
14 L [UCLA]. Campo (5.1 mi NE), 1 Jan 1966, TJZ (UCLA 512), 3 L [UCLA]. Campo (4.9 mi
NE), 2 Feb 1966, TJZ (UCLA 290), 9 lpM (290-10-18), 15 pM (290-31-34,100-111,113), 3 pF
(290-30,112,114), 1 lp (290-19), 10 M, 4 F, 18 P, 131 L [UCLA]. Jacumba, 2 Feb 1966, TJZ
(UCLA 291), 5 IpM (291-10,11,13-15), 2 IpF (291-16-18), 13 pM (291-30,100-110,112,113), 3 pF
(291-31,33,111), 4 M, 10 F, 12 P, 24 L [UCLA]. Pala (0.5 mi W), 3 Feb 1966, TJZ (UCLA 293),
2 IpM (293-10,18), 7 IlpF (293-11,13,16,17,19,31), 17 pM (293-40,41,100-114), 2 pF (293-30,42),
32 M, 5 F, 43 P, 79 L [UCLA]. Pauma Valley (18 mi SE), 1 Jan 1966, TJZ (UCLA 510), 3 L
[UCLA]; same data (UCLA 511), 3 L [UCLA]. San Joaquin Co.: Stockton, H.J. Quayle, 1 F
[USNM]. San Luis Obispo Co.: La Panza Campground, 28 mi E Santa Margarita, 2400 ft, 18 Apr
1964, TJZ (UCLA 505), 15 M, 14 F [UCLA]; same data, 26 Oct 1971, HA (UCLA 587), 5 lpM
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 29
(587-13,15,16,20,27), 13 IpF (587-10-12,14,17-19,22-26,28), 2 lp (587-21,29), 13 M, 4 F, 27P,
51 L [UCLA]. La Panza Campground (3 mi E), 2500 ft, 26 Oct 1971, HA (UCLA 586), 3 IpF
(586-10-12) [UCLA]. La Panza Ranger Station, 27 mi E Santa Margarita, 2400 ft, 26 Oct 1971, HA
(UCLA 588), 7 lpM (588-10-13,15-17), 1 lp (688-14) [UCLA] . San Mateo Co.: La Honda, 26 Mar
1949, F. Prince, 15 M, 2 F [UCLA]. Santa Barbara Co.: Santa Barbara (2 mi N), 50 ft, 25 Sept
1971, HA (UCLA 583), 2 IpM (583-13,15), 3 IpF (583-11,12,17), 2 lp (583-10,14) [UCLA] . Sol-
vang (5.5 mi SW), 700 ft, 25 Sept 1971, HA (UCLA 584), 3 IpM (584-18,23,32), 27 IpF (584-
10-17,19-22,24-31,33-39), 11 M, 2 F, 37 P, 129 L [UCLA]. Santa Clara Co.: Palo Alto (Stanford),
23 June-7 July 1903, 4 M, 9 F [USNM]; same data, 27 Dec 1965, TJZ (UCLA 509), 2 L [UCLA].
San Jose, 2 Mar 1941, W.C. Reeves, 8 M [UCLA]. Santa Cruz Co.: Big Basin, 18 July 1954, A.L.
Melander, 3 M [USNM]. Shasta Co.: Hazel Creek, 9-10 Sept 1933, CCC Survey, 14 F [USNM].
McArthur-Burney Falls St. Park, 3000 ft, 18 Sept 1969, HA, LTN (UCLA 671), 4 lpM (671-11,
14,16,19), 6 lpF (671-12,13,15,17,18,20), 12 M, 13 F, 3 L [UCLA-UTAH] . Siskiyou Co.: Dunsmuir,
19 July 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 5 F [USNM]. Sonoma Co.: Monte Rio, 16 Feb 1952, 6 M
[UCLA]. Tehama Co.: Corning, 2 Apr 1957, R. Gifford, 3 F [UCLA] . Tulare Co.: Sequoia Natl.
Park, Heather Lake, 8 Aug 1949, W.W. Wirth, 1 M [USNM]. Three Rivers, 800 ft, 13 Sept 1969,
HA, LTN (UCLA 669), 3 IpM (669-16-18), 7 IpF (669-11-15,19-21), 28 M, 33 F, 12 P, 34 L
[UCLA-UTAH] ; same data, E.J. Bigham, 1 M, 10 F [USNM]. Tuolumne Co.: Yosemite Natl. Park,
Tuolumne Grove, 22. July 1954, W.A. McDonald, 2 F [UCLA]. Ventura Co,: Lake Piru, 9 Feb
1964, TJZ (UCLA 496), 119 M, 39 F, 27 P, 68 L [UCLA] ; same data (UCLA 418), 2 M [UCLA].
Yolo Co.: Davis, 2 June 1952, A.D. Telford, 16 L [USNM] . County Unknown: Nice, 22 Feb 1942,
A.W. Lindquist, 1 M, 1 P, 4 L [USNM]. Taylor Park Estates, 15 Feb 1952, 1 F [UCLA]. Locality
Unknown: Dyar and Caudell, 5 M, 2 F [USNM].
Idaho. Bingham Co.: Firth, 4550 ft, 13 June 1970, HA (UCLA 690), 1 IpM (690-19), 4 IpF
(690-11,13,14,17), 1 Ip (690-12), 17 M, 39 F, 14 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Blaine Co.: Bellevue (2.5 mi
S), 5300 ft, 25 July 1969, JHL (UCLA 672), 2 IpM (672-13,14), 3 IpF (672-11,12,17), 10 M, 2 F
[UCLA-UTAH]. Ketchum (6 mi N), 6200 ft, 28 July 1968, LTN (UCLA 644),4M,5 F,2P,2L
[UCLA-UTAH] . Bonner Co. : Clark’s Fork, 2100 ft, 17 Aug 1967, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 642), 1 M,
1F,6P,4L[UCLA-UTAH]. Bonneville Co.: Swan Valley (5 miS), 5400 ft, 25 Aug 1968, HA, LTN
(UCLA 665), 4 F, 4 L [UCLA-UTAH] . Custer Co.: Challis (12 mi NE), 5200 ft, 13 June 1970, HA
(UCLA 689), 3 IpM (689-15,17,18), 7 lpF (689-11-14,16,19,20), 23 M, 18 F, 18 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Lemhi Co.: North Fork (1 mi S), 3900 ft, 4 Aug 1965, HA (UCLA 655), 1 M, 3 F [UCLA-UTAH].
Madison Co.: Heise Hot Springs, 5200 ft, 26 Aug 1968, HA, LTN (HA-20-68), 1 M, 3 F [UTAH].
Thornton, 4800 ft, 26 Aug 1968, HA, LTN (UCLA 666), 3 M, 18 F, 6 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Montana. Flathead Co.: West Glacier Park, 26 Aug 1959, LTN, 1 F [UTAH]. Granite Co.:
Drummond (2 mi S), 16 Aug 1967, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 640), 4 M, 9 F [UCLA-UTAH] . Hall
(6 miS), 4450 ft, 16 Aug 1967, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 639), 5 M, 11 F [UCLA-UTAH] . Lake Co.:
Flathead Lake, MSU Biol. Sta., 3000 ft, 12 July 1951, LTN, 2 F [UTAH]. Missoula Co.: Missoula
(27 mi E), 3675 ft, 16 Aug 1967, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA 641), 9 M, 4 F [UCLA-UTAH] . Ravalli
Co.: Corvallis, 27 June 1948, Jenkins, 1 M, 1 F [UCLA]. Hamilton, 3500 ft, 12 June 1970, HA
(UCLA 688), 9 IpF (688-12-14,16-20), 1 IF (688-15), 16 M, 28 F, 33 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Nevada. Douglas Co.: Glenbrook, 6200 ft, 25 Aug 1915, H.G. Dyar, 1 M, 1 F [USNM] ; same
data, 5 May 1970, HA, RN (UCLA 679), 1 lpM (679-11), 2 IpF (679-12,18), 1 Ip (679-16), 1 L
[UCLA-UTAH].
Oregon. Benton Co.: Corvallis (9 mi N, Berry Creek), 6 June 1959, 5 M [USNM] . Douglas Co. :
Roseburg, 21 Aug 1955, 2 M, 2 F [USNM]. Jackson Co.: Prospect, 26 May 1921, H.G. Dyar, 1 M
[USNM]; same data, 1 June 1921, 1 M [USNM]. Lincoln Co.: Saddleback Mtn., 4 July 1959,
J.C. Dirks-Edmunds, 1 M [USNM]; same data, 11 July 1959, 2 F [USNM]; same data, 25 July
1959, 2 M, 1 F [USNM]; same data, 15 Aug 1959, 1 F [USNM]; same data, 18 June 1960, 1 M,
2 F [USNM]; same data, 16 July 1960, 2 M, 4 F [USNM]; same data, 6 Aug 1960, 1 M, 2
F [USNM]; same data, 27 Aug 1960, 1 M [USNM]; same data, 24 June 1961, 1 M, 2 F [USNM];
same data, 30 June 1961, 1 M [USNM]; same data, 8 July 1961, 3 M, 1 F [USNM]; same data,
9 July 1961, 1 M [USNM]. Marion Co.: Detroit, 21 May 1924, H.G. Dyar, 1 M, 2 F [USNM];
same data, 7 June 1970, HA (UCLA 686), 2 lpM (686-11,16), 6 lpF (686-12-15,17,20), 23 M, 6 F,
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
6 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Mill City, 23 May 1924, H.G. Dyar, 1 M [USNM]. Stayton (1 mi N), 200 ft,
7 June 1970, HA (UCLA 687), 2 IpM (687-12,13), 5 IpF (687-11,14,16,17), 1 lp (687-20), 20 M,
60 F, 6 L [UCLA-UTAH]. Tillamook Co.: Rockaway, 27 June 1920, L.P. Rockwood, 25 M
[USNM]. Umatilla Co.: Pendleton (2 mi E), 1070 ft, 18 Aug 1967, HA, LTN, JHL (UCLA
643), 4 M, 14 F, 5 P, 3 L [UCLA-UTAH].
Utah. Weber Co.: Riverdale, 4300 ft, 4 Oct 1970, HA (UCLA 697), 4 lpM (697-11,13,15,17), 1
IpF (697-16), 1 Ip (697-19), 12 M, 36 F, 20 P, 66 L [UCLA]. Trout Springs (3 mi E), 4725 ft,
13 May 1970, LTN (UCLA 685), 6 M, 7 F [UCLA].
Washington. Chelan Co.: Stevens Pass, 25 June 1955, J.N. Belkin, 1 M [UCLA]. Clallam Co. :
Lake Crescent, 3 Sept 1934, A.L. Melander, 2 F [USNM] . Jefferson Co.: Clearwater, 4 June 1934,
CCC Survey, 10 M, 2 F [USNM]. Olympic Natl. Park, Hoh Ranger Station, 4 Aug 1955, LTN, 1 M,
1 F [UCLA]. Quilcene, 20 Aug, R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. King Co.: Kent, 30 June 1909,
Burke, 2 M, 2 F [USNM]. Seattle, 31 July 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 2 F [USNM]; same data,
17 July 1917, H.G. Dyar, 1 M [USNM]. Lewis Co.: Morton, 10 July 1931, C.M. Gjullin, 1 F
[USNM]. Mason Co.: Belfair, 23 May 1934, CCC Survey, 1 M [USNM]. Hoodsport, 7 July 1920,
H.G. Dyar, 2 M, 4 F [USNM]. Lake Cushman, 27 June 1917, H.G. Dyar, 6 M, 1 F [USNM];
same data, 4 July 1920, 14 M, 4 F [USNM]. Okanagan Co.: Okanagan, 19 July 1920, H.G. Dyar,
1 F [USNM]. Pierce Co.: Ashford,4 Aug 1906, Dyar and Caudell, 3 F [USNM]; same data, 9 June
1921, H.G. Dyar, 3 M, 1 F [USNM]. San Juan Co.: Orcas Island, Mt. Constitution, 7 July 1905,
J.M. Aldrich, 2 M [USNM]. Friday Harbor, 28 May 1906, J.M. Aldrich, 2 M, 1 F [USNM]. Skagit
Co.: Guemes Island, 13 July 1906, J.M. Aldrich, 1 M [USNM]. Skamania Co.: Columbia River,
May 1930, Sam Samson, 8 P, 20 L [USNM] . Snohomish Co.: Stanwood, 5 Aug 1925, A.L. Melander,
1 F [USNM]. Sultan Basin, 2 Sept 1933, CCC Survey, 5 F [USNM]. Walla Walla Co.: Walla Walla,
2-6 July 1922, A.L. Melander, 1 F [USNM]; same data, 18 Aug 1923, 1 F [USNM]. County
Unknown: Canyon Creek, 26 July 1925, A.L. Melander, 8 F [USNM].
NO DATA
1 M, 5 F [USNM].
FIGURES
Distribution of the Varipalpus Group
Mesonotal scale pattern of the Varipalpus Group species
Aedes (O.) laguna; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (O.) laguna; larva
Aedes (O.) monticola; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (O.) monticola; larva
Aedes (O.) varipalpus; adult morphology
Aedes (O.) varipalpus; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (O.) varipalpus; larva
10. Aedes (O.) deserticola; male genitalia and pupa
11. Aedes (O.) deserticola; larva
12. Aedes (O.) sierrensis; male genitalia and pupa
13. Aedes (O.) sierrensis; larva
eT ae oe
|Fig.1
OCHLEROTATUS
Varipalpus Group
ane gg RRs
4 e
a, | 2 Waser -varipalpus
sierrensis ne dell Pies
> f/
deserticola
pao &
®
)
fi
(eae |
Nie y “Py UD
i Mais We. i
FLAY h
ie
i"
PY
AN) i
vi i
Ny
1.0
laguna <2
“Awih)
OCHLEROTATUS Femi
‘ fiir aay oy
Varipalpus Group Cel :
yl yey 4
ait
.9 bf oe
i vv
dark brown to black Fhe
golden 1.0
yellow
white
Att
itl yy ny
viv"
vy-V
1.0
sierrensis
So. California
Fig.3
UCLA 695
Baja California Sur
Mexico
laguna
UCLA 695
Baja California Sur
_
i=)
],
=a’
iP
Fig.5
3 10)1/E
OCHLEROTATUS
7 GY
UCLA 694
Arizona
United States
ZA monticola
0.3
GZ
Y
7 J
ft:
(F
GEL in
(GAA ‘ SS
1
{
~
sha
a
SS
SS
<a
United States
KY i
Mie ce
boy) <=
. | Cea
ay gs ae D se “a
UCLA 303 XE Bee
Arizona , :
+ Ags
monticola
UCLA 660
viz0na
United States
FORE MID HIND
Fig 7 | OCHLEROTATUS
Vy
WiKi
i i
i,
i)
mn
Yl yilf
CHAI
LNW f/
4 LA
GY)
GY) i} M4 \
Gd Ni
pare 4 ZI
A
AAs FORE MID HIND
neo
: yy Hi ,
H})\\
G ALN
Y)\\\
Ys’
10 erat GN \\ ©
4
ON
varipalpus
UCLA 416
Arizona
United States
OCHLEROTATUS
varipalpus
Arizona
United States
OCHLEROTATUS
‘ 12 4
2\6
9 3
AW xX
P i\
@\
11 ~
yf
1
2
Ly
3
Ln Sps alt 3
C Fig. 10
Coe OCHLEROTATUS
2 5
}
\ f
Kt
l .)
Ye Ss
OCHLEROTATUS
ir
deserticola
ae
Calt,
Unite a Sta nal
Fig. 12
OCHLEROTATUS
Sierrensis
UCLA 669
alifornia
United States
. \
\\
\\\
Y
Ze "
Zs Wi ,
é f /
C-sbp y)
Oe BLE i
: So ae Ny
la Ogu Al! \ Nid
: Whe At
| i)
P
Pappy senna:
ad Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
REFERENCES CITED
Adames, Abdiel J.
1971. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXIV. A revision of the crabhole
mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 7(2).
154 p.
Anderson, Don L.
1971. The San Andreas Fault. Sci. Am. 225:53-68.
Belkin, John N.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Berkeley, Univ.
Calif. Press. 2 vol.
Belkin, John N., S.J. Heinemann and W.A. Page
1970. The Culicidae of Jamaica (Mosquito Studies. XXI). Am. Entomol. Inst.,
Contrib. 6(1). 458 p. (Also published as Inst. Jam., Bull. Sci. Ser. 20)
Belkin, John N. and W.A. McDonald
1956. Aedes sierrensis (Ludlow, 1905), a change in name for the western tree-
hole mosquito of the Pacific Slope (Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash.,
Proc. 58:344.
1957. A new species of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) from treeholes in southern Arizona
and a discussion of the varipalpus complex (Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol.
Soc. Am., Ann. 50:179-191.
Belkin, John N., R.X. Schick, P. Galindo and T.H.G. Aitken
1965. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). I. A project for a systematic study
of the mosquitoes of Middle America. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 1(2):
1-17.
Berlin, O. George W.
1969. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XII. A revision of the Neotropical
subgenus Howardina of Aedes. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 4(2). 190 p.
Blaisdell, Frank E. |
1906. Notes and description of the larva of Culex varipalpus Coquillett. Entomol.
News 17:107-109. |
Blanchard, Raphael
1905. Les moustiques. Histoire naturelle et medicale. Paris, de Rudeval. 673 p.
Breland, Osmond P.
1957. Some techniques for collecting tree hole breeding mosquitoes. Mosq. News
17:305-308.
Carpenter, Stanley J. and W.J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (north of Mexico). Berkeley, Univ. Calif.
Press. 360 p.
Coquillett, Daniel W.
1902. Three new species of Culex. Can. Entomol. 34:292-293.
1906. A classification of the mosquitoes of North and Middle America. U.S. Bur.
Entomol., Tech. Ser. 11. 31 p.
Cupp, Eddie W. and W.R. Horsfall
1969. Biological bases for placement of Aedes sierrensis (Ludlow) in the sub-
genus Finlaya Theobald. Mosq. Syst. Newsl. 1:51-52.
Dyar, Harrison G.
1904a. Notes on the mosquitoes of British Columbia. Entomol. Soc. Wash.,
Proc. 6:37-40.
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 45
1904b. The life history of Culex varipalpus Coquillett. N.Y. Entomol. Soc., J.
12:90-92.
1905a. Remarks on genitalic genera in the Culicidae. Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc.
7:42-49,
1905b. Illustrations of the abdominal appendages of certain mosquitoes. N.Y.
Entomol. Soc., J. 13:53-56.
1907. Report on the mosquitoes of the coast region of California, with des-
criptions of new species. U.S. Natl. Mus., Proc. 32:121-129.
1917a. The mosquitoes of the mountains of California. Insecutor Inscitiae Mens.
5:11-21.
1917b. The mosquitoes of the Pacific Northwest (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor
Inscitiae Mens. 5:97-102.
1918. The male genitalia of Aedes as indicative of natural affinities (Diptera,
Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 6:71-86.
1919. Westward extension of the Canadian mosquito fauna (Diptera, Culicidae).
Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 7:11-39.
1920a. The mosquitoes of British Columbia and the Yukon Territory, Canada
(Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 8:1-27.
1920b. The Aedes of the mountains of California and Oregon (Diptera, Culici-
dae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 8:165-173.
1922. The mosquitoes of the United States. U.S. Natl. Mus., Proc. 62:1-119.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Wash., Carnegie Inst. Wash. (Publ. 387).
616 p.
Dyar, Harrison G. and F. Knab
1906. The larvae of Culicidae classified as independent organisms. N.Y. Entomol.
Soc., J. 14:169-230.
Edwards, Frederick W.
1932. Diptera. Fam. Culicidae. Genera Insectorum 194. 258 p.
Felt, Ephraim P.
1905. Studies in Culicidae. N.Y. State Mus., Bull. 97:442-497, 562-564.
Freeborn, Stanley B.
1926. The mosquitoes of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 3:333-460.
Gardner, Clark F.
1971. Morphology of the mouthparts of larval mosquitoes of the subgenus Och-
lerotatus, genus Aedes. Univ. Utah, Ph.D. dissertation. 216 p.
Hearle, Eric
1926. The mosquitoes of the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, and their
control. Natl. Res. Counc. (Ottawa) Rep. 17. 94 p.
Howard, Leland O., H.G. Dyar and F. Knab
1913. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 2.
Plates. Wash., Carnegie Inst. Wash. (Publ. 159). 150 plates. 24 Feb.
1917. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 4.
Systematic description (in two parts). Part II. Wash., Carnegie Inst. Wash.
(Publ. 159). p. 525-1064. 31 Mar.
Jenkins, Dale W. and S.J. Carpenter
1946. Ecology of the tree hole breeding mosquitoes of Nearctic North America.
Ecol. Monogr. 16:33-47.
Judson, Charles L., Y. Hokama and J.W. Kliewer
1966. Embryogeny and hatching of Aedes sierrensis eggs (Diptera: Culicidae).
Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 59:1181-1184.
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
Knight, Kenneth L. and E.N. Marks
1952. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of the subgenus Finlaya, genus
Aedes. U.S. Natl. Mus., Proc. 101:513-574.
Ludlow, Clara S.
1905. A new North American Taeniorhynchus. Can. Entomol. 37:231-232.
1906. Mosquito notes—No. 4. (Continued.) Can. Entomol. 38:132-134.
Lunt, Steele R. and L.T. Nielsen
1971. The use of thoracic setae as a taxonomic tool and as an aid in establishing
phylogenetic relationships in adult female Aedes mosquitoes of North America.
Mosq. Syst. Newsl. 3:102-121.
Matheson, Robert
1929. A handbook of the mosquitoes of North America. Springfield, Ill., Thom-
as. 268 p.
1944. Handbook of the mosquitoes of North America. Ed. 2. Ithaca, Comstock
Publ. Co. 314 p.
McDonald, William A.
1957. The adults and immature stages of Aedes muelleri Dyar (Diptera: Culici-
dae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 50:505-511.
Myers, Charles M.
1967. Identification and descriptions of Aedes eggs from California and Nevada
(Diptera: Culicidae). Can. Entomol. 99:795-807.
Nielsen, Lewis T., J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam
1967. A report on the distribution and biology of tree hole mosquitoes of the
western United States. Calif. Mosq. Control Assoc., Proc. Pap., Annu. Conf.
35:72-76.
Nielsen, Lewis T., J.H. Linam, J.H. Arnell and T.J. Zavortink
1968. Distributional and biological notes on the tree hole mosquitoes of the west-
ern United States. Mosq. News 28:361-365.
Nielsen, Lewis T., J.H. Linam and D.M. Rees
1963. New distribution records for mosquitoes in the Rocky Mountain States.
N.J. Mosq. Exterm. Assoc., Proc., Annu. Meet. 50:424-428.
Nielsen, Lewis T. and D.M. Rees
1959. The mosquitoes of Utah—a revised list. Mosq. News 19:45-47.
1961. An identification guide to the mosquitoes of Utah. Univ. Utah Biol. Ser.
12(3). 63 p.
Peyton, E.L.
1956. Biology of the Pacific Coast tree hole mosquito Aedes varipalpus (Coq.).
Mosq. News 16:220-224.
Pratt, Harry D.
1956. A check list of the mosquitoes (Culicinae) of North America (Diptera:
Culicidae). Mosq. News 16:4-10.
Reeves, William C.
1940. Research with Aedes varipalpus (Coq.) the Pacific Coast tree hole mos-
quito. Calif. Mosq. Control Assoc., Proc. 11:39-43.
Richards, Charles S., L.T. Nielsen and D.M. Rees
1956. Mosquito records from the Great Basin and the drainage of the lower Colo-
rado River. Mosq. News 16:10-17.
Rohlf, F. James
1963. Classification of Aedes by numerical taxonomic methods (Diptera: Culici-
dae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 56:798-804.
Arnell & Nielsen: Aedes varipalpus Group 47
Ross, Edward S.
1943. New and additional Lower California mosquito records (Diptera: Culici-
dae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 19:86.
Stage, Harry H., C.M. Gjullin and W.W. Yates
1952. Mosquitoes of the Northwestern States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handb.
46. 95 p.
Stone, Alan and K.L. Knight |
1956. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Museum: II,
The genus Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 46:213-228.
Theobald, Frederick V.
1910. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes. Vol. 5. Lond., Br. Mus.
(Nat. Hist.). 646 p.
Trebatoski, Alice M. and J.F. Haynes )
1969. Comparison of enzymes of twelve species of mosquitoes. Entomol. Soc.
Am., Ann. 62:327-335.
Zavortink, Thomas J.
1970. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XVI. A new species of treehole
breeding Aedes (Ochlerotatus) from southern California. Am. Entomol. Inst.,
Contrib. 5(1):1-7.
APPENDIX
Aedes ( ? Ochlerotatus), Jamaican form
As indicated in the section on Systematics there is some suggestion that the
single male (without genitalia), described briefly by Belkin, Heinemann and Page
(1970:143-144) may be realted to the Varipalpus Group. We have therefore pre-
pared a more detailed description here.
MALE. Wing: 3.00 mm. Proboscis: 2.55 mm. Forefemur: 1.90 mm. Medium-
sized species; integument dark brown; white markings on head, thorax, legs; ab-
domen missing. Head: Eyes widely separated above antennae. Decumbent scales
curved, pointed, white on median line and along orbital border, mostly dark lat-
erad of median line, and mixed dark and light posteriorly; orbital line expanded
laterally into patch of broad, white appressed scales, no orbital line below this
patch; postgena with patch of broad, dark scales with white scales below. Forked,
erect scales over dorsal surface, mostly dark. Two pairs of light frontal bristles;
6 pairs of dark orbital bristles. Clypeus dark brown, bare. Proboscis short, 1.38
of forefemur length, entirely dark scaled; a few basal bristles present. Palpus 0.69
of proboscis length, 5-segmented; segment 1 dark scaled; segments 2 and 3 an-
kylosed, making up 0.53 of palpus length, segment 3 expanded apically, both seg-
ments without scales ventrally, remainder dark scaled with narrow white ring at
apex of segment 3, 3 short bristles laterally at apical 0.5 and 0.7 and apex of
segment 3; segment 4 dark scaled, with narrow basal and apical white rings and
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 2, 1972
4 or 5 long bristles evenly spaced along lateroventral edge; segment 5 upturned,
dark scaled, with basal white ring and a few white scales apically, a few long
bristles evenly spaced along entire ventral length. Antenna 0.57 of proboscis; torus
enlarged, with white scales on mesal surface; flagellar segments 1-12 with num-
erous long bristles; segment 13 with basal whorl of 6 long bristles; segments 12
and 13 elongate, their combined length about 0.8 of first 11 segments. Thorax:
Mesonotum slightly arched. Mesonotal integument dark brown; partially denuded;
scales all narrow, curved, in indistinct pattern of pale golden on dark brown to
black background, light scales more numerous anteriorly, in posterior fossal area,
outer posterior dorsocentral area and around prescutellar space. Acrostichal, dor-
socentral, prescutal and supraalar bristles present, well developed. Paratergite with
white scales, narrow, curved anteriorly, broad posteriorly; with mixed light and
dark bristles. Scutellum dark brown, lobes with patches of narrow, curved white
scales and about 8 long, dark bristles and several smaller bristles. Postnotum dark
brown, bare. Pleural integument brown, lighter around spiracle and at wing base.
Apn not enlarged. Pleural bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra, stp, upper mep,
lower mep. Apn with patch of mostly erect, broad white scales; ppn covered pos-
teriorly with broad white appressed scales and a few dark scales; patches of broad,
white appressed or semierect scales on ppl, psp, ssp, pra below knob; 2 patches
on stp, 1 on upper margin and 1 posteriorly at level of midcoxa; patch on upper
mep extending ventrally to about middle of sclerite; metameron, hypostigial area
and meron without scales. Legs: Rather short, forefemur about 1.25 height of tho-
rax (mesonotum to apex of midcoxa). Hindcoxa subequal to midcoxa, its base
well below upper margin of meron. Forecoxa with white scales basally and api-
cally, dark scales between; midcoxa and hindcoxa with white scales. Trochanters
with white scales. Femora mostly dark scaled, with narrow basal and apical white
rings and scattered white scales, white scales forming streak on basal ventral and
dorsal surfaces of forefemur to near apex and basal ventral surface of midfemur
and hindfemur to near apex. Foretibia dark scaled, with a few apical white scales;
midtibia dark scaled, with a few basal and apical white scales. Hindtibia missing.
Foretarsus dark scaled, with narrow basal white ring on base of segment 1, nar-
row basal white ring and white apical dorsal patch on segment 2; midtarsus dark
scaled, with narrow basal ring and apical white patch on segments | and 2 and
narrow basal white ring on segment 3. Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, un-
equal, with acute subbasal tooth. Wing: Entirely dark scaled. Haltere: Light brown,
with white scales on upper part of knob. Abdomen: Tergite I with few white
scales mesally; laterotergite with small, dense patch of white scales. Remainder
of abdomen missing.
Ma 2 yeti
ia
ere
rs
ht hare
yt pane ile te +s
anise tat P ystrougrsn aes.
: hee ey dia nh aia rea hn Bey ism, sea
eee We Tbh a ; . ;
es i ane : . i ‘
cre stata act ae a Sapcligee ovis
Se sey i pis
Jie ‘7
ip Agree
io tee Wa
ca
Shiai
ac hod. ite x fee ates) |
aout y ea bial ae ;
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 8, Number 3, 1964
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
XXVIII. The New World species formerly placed in
Aedes (Finlaya). By Thomas J. Zavortink
MOSQUITO STUDIES (Diptera, Culicidae)
XXVIII. THE NEW WORLD SPECIES FORMERLY
PLACED IN AEDES (FINLAYA ,
by
Thomas J. Zavortink’
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
SYSTEMATICS . . , 3
MEDICAL IMPORTANCE ae 4
KEYS TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA 4
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT . . ENS Oa eet ree ee re ee fey rents
Genus Aedes, Subgenus Pro ey eT a Tee ay ane ene ere
Keys to Groups Debra is EN tee caiga ies Line seeemabinaetene Tinea itt ea! Tat
Triseriatus Group. i?
Keys to Species ... 19
1. Aedes (P.) hendersoni 20
D> ete ere a ahh a he eal ge Ce gos vans co ae se a eee
S. eR) BrSeHG TS. 2) eR gis ie I ees Nan de ee ie Ghee
Zoosophus Group. . Ag naY ae.) “ire RRC tah aoe ener a
4, Aedes (P.) zoosophus IY Se segle, Sia Tp FSH ek eee Rt EA age de ke
Komi ahigaee 236 oie sk ae 5 taotine’ hea ee ating orbs Oak CAE wt arian eee
Keys.to,Species.. .... eames Staak te, Ss eal em Be aT one's ahaa a lee eg an iain ee
5. Aedes (P.) puréeria, Syernae . escaasay lh Weed, | nee ck Dice ike amare abe: Pao cage
6. AvdestP PROM fo yo te ied By a tahicks (407s Re ates Shee
Fn, Aedesd PJ BCR oo iat, eA SOR ee ee
8. Aedesd Pd chionetiiis ides nek Gvarmcomeitie wine Serta
9. Aedes (PF Paieoseuiittvinc: i we noc Unies tae oes Cees
LO. Aedest? Jeondiae cosets aah Sree hee Te Daten aie oS
KnabiGroup . . 1927 tad pikean Cees gad Paraben te ee, Sa
11. Aedes (P.) bhated vinges” tecabiay hwapanmis rab LARC ae ennai ies, “em
Subgenus Kompia . . sd cura gu ea ay edae tenet ache rs are ar Where ean
12. Aedes (K.) purpureines yr etsy pene Sie aie Plan wie A ee ee
Subgenus Abraedes . . . og 4d peeve ved satan eS “legen ate Se oe A gi, ae
13. Aedes (Abr.) papago . ge Sy Sa mare eee PR erie ee ae
‘Contribution from project “Mosquitoes of Middle America” supported by U.S. Public Health
Service Research Grant AI-04379 and U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Research Contract DA-49-193-MD-2478.
* Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024.
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
_ Subgenus Aztecaedes te
14. Aedes (Azt.) ramirezi
Subgenus Gymnometopa . :
15. Aedes (G.) diovan ;
Subgenus Ochlerotatus . ;
Pulchritarsis Section, Muelleri Eronp :
16. Aedes (O.) muelleri .
Atropalpus Section .
Keys to Groups
Atropalpus Group
Keys to Species :
17. Aedes (O.) enariius
18. Aedes (O.) Bea
Fluviatilis Group . .
19. Aedes (O. ye
Genus Haemagogus, Subgenus Conoposteaus :
Keys to Species :
20. Haemagogus (C. ) ele ee
21. Haemagogus (C.) sp., Large © ombicn cat
22. Haemagogus (C.) sp., Peruvian highland form
23. Haemagogus (C.) leucophoebus
24. Haemagogus (C.) leucocelaenus
25. Haemagogus(C.) clarki. . .
26. Haemagogus (C.) sp., Small Colombian for
27. Haemagogus (C.) sp., Peruvian lowland form
REFERENCES CITED
FIGURES
SYSTEMATIC INDEX
Zavortink: New World Aedes 3
INTRODUCTION
The present revision includes the majority of the species of New World Aedes
(Finlaya) exclusive of the Terrens Group, as well as Aedes (Abraedes), Aedes
(Kompia) and Aedes (Ochlerotatus) muelleri. A total of 23 named species, known
in all stages, and 4 unnamed forms, known by 1 or more females, is treated.
In all, 22,235 specimens, 4,164 males, 4,967 females, 7,542 larvae, 5,562 pupae
and 2,424 individual rearings (1,497 larval, 767 pupal, 160 incomplete) have been
examined.
The methods of study and presentation, as well as the terminology and ab-
breviations, follow, in general, Belkin (1962); a few additional terms for the meso-
scutal markings and details of the genitalia follow Berlin (1969) and Schick (1970a),
respectively.
I am indebted to John N. Belkin for reading the manuscript and suggesting
certain improvements; Harold C. Chapman, George B. Craig, Jr., Pedro Galindo,
Kenneth L. Knight, Lewis T. Nielsen, George F. O’Meara, L.L. Pechuman, John
F. Reinert, Paul L. Rice, Alan Stone, Floyd G. Werner, and Michael J. Zavortink
for loans of museum specimens or gifts of live mosquitoes; Willis W. Wirth for
information on the type of Finlaya nigra; Abdiel J. Adames, J. Hal Arnell, Lewis
T. Nielsen and Robert X. Schick for stimulating discussions; Sandra J. Heinemann
and William A. Powder for help in the preparation and rearing of specimens;
Sharon Burmeister, L. Margaret Kowalczyk and Nancy L. Martsch for prepara-
tion of many of the preliminary drawings and L. Margaret Kowalczyk for prep-
aration of all of the final illustrations; Claire M. Price for typing a portion of ©
the preliminary draft; and, finally, Caryle Stallard for typing the remainder of
the preliminary draft, providing editorial assistance and preparing the text copy
for lithoprinting.
SYSTEMATICS
I am removing all New World Aedes that have been placed in the subgenus
Finlaya from that subgenus and assigning them to other subgenera or genera, as
follows: the Triseriatus, Zoosophus, Kompi and Knabi Groups treated in the pres-
ent paper and the Terrens Group treated by Schick (1970a,b) are placed into
the subgenus Protomacleaya of Aedes; ramirezi and mediovittatus are placed into
the monotypic subgenera Aztecaedes and Gymnometopa of Aedes, respectively;
the Atropalpus and Fluviatilis Groups are placed into the subgenus Ochlerotatus
of Aedes; scutellalbum and upatensis are transferred to Ochlerotatus, where they
are related to milleri Dyar, 1922 and lepidus Cerqueira and Paraense, 1945, re-
spectively, and are not considered further because of lack of material; and, the
Leucocelaenus Group is placed into the subgenus Conopostegus and transferred
to Haemagogus. The present paper also treats the monotypic subgenera Kompia
and Abraedes of Aedes and Aedes (Ochlerotatus) muelleri.
In hope of making the keys that follow more useful, I have included in them,
where possible, the following additional groups of New World container-breeding
Aedes: the subgenus Howardina, the Terrens Group of Protomacleaya, the Vari-
palpus Group of Ochlerotatus, and Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti. Additional infor-
mation on these taxa may be found in the revision of Howardina by Berlin (1969),
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
the revision of the Terrens Group by Schick (1970a,b), the revision of the Vari-
palpus Group by Arnell and Nielsen (1972), and, for aegypti, ‘““The Culicidae of
Jamaica” by Belkin, Heinemann and Page (1970).
MEDICAL IMPORTANCE
Aedes triseriatus is known to be a vector of the LaCrosse strain of California
encephalitis in Ohio and Wisconsin, Aedes fluviatilis may have been a vector of
sylvan yellow fever in Brazil on 1 occasion, and species of Haemagogus (Con-
opostegus) have been found naturally infected with yellow fever in Brazil and
Colombia and with the arbovirus Una in Brazil. In addition, laboratory experi-
ments have shown Aedes atropalpus, Aedes fluviatilis, Aedes triseriatus and Haema-
gogus leucocelaenus capable of transmitting 1 or more of the following: eastern
equine encephalomyelitis, western equine encephalomyelitis, Venezuelan equine
encephalomyelitis and yellow fever. Additional details on natural and artificial
infections can be found in the bionomics section of the 4 species just named
and the large and small Colombian forms of Haemagogus (Conopostegus).
In addition, it should be stressed that most of the species included in the pres-
ent revision are known to be anthropophilic and many are capable of breeding
in natural or artificial containers in domestic or quasi-domestic situations, and,
as a consequence, all these are of potential importance as vectors of arboviruses.
KEYS TO GENERA AND SUBGENERA
ADULTS
- Mesoscutum with moderately broad to broad flat scales; mesoscutum with
metallic coppery, green, blue or violet scales or pleuron with 2 very
conspicuous, nearly vertical bands of scales. . . . . . . Haemagogus
Mesoscutum with narrow curved scales; mesoscutum never with metallic
coppery, green, blue or violet scales; pleuron usually without vertical
bands of scales, rarely with a single conspicuous vertical band. . . . .2
2(1). Postspiracular area without bristles (12. purpureipes) . . . Aedes (Kompia)
Postspiracular area with bristles . RL eee ©
3(2). Abdominal tergites VI and VII with a pair of large, bristly, scaleless areas;
sternopleuron with 2 narrow, diagonal, median lines of silver scales (13.
papago) .. ‘ . . . Aedes (Abraedes)
Abdominal tergites VI and VIL completely scaled: sternopleuron with a
single narrow, median, diagonal or horizontal line of scales, a single med-
ian patch of scales, or nearly entirely covered with scales . .... .4
4(3). Mesoscutum with a very narrow white-scaled median acrostichal line that
is continued as a median prescutellar line through prescutellar space to
scutellum; EY bare; tarsi entirely dark scaled (14. ramirezi) .
5 Aedes (Aztecaedes)
Wecoecutun. never arn tino ‘ight- edled median acrostichal and med-
5(4).
6(5).
7(6).
8(7).
9(8).
10(9).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 5
ian prescutellar lines; paratergite with scales and/or tarsi with 1 or more
Lahti AAS sine ars) oebiwisinh iluntysts «ase te epee SB epeemaue id wae 8D
Clypeus with scales; scutellum with broad flat silver-white scales on all lobes
forming a complete transverse band (aegypti; see Systematics) :
: . Aedes ( Steconipia)
Clypeus without scales: scutellum “without eae flat white scales on all
lobes: fonming. ancomipete transverse. band, 2° fan, aie lek Ts UD
Sternopleuron without scales at base of prealar knob; hindtibia with con-
spicuous patch of white scales about 0.3-0.4 distance from base (15.
mediovittatus) . . . . Aedes (Gymnometopa)
Sternopleuron with scales at base of prealar knob: hindtibia without patch
of white scales about 0.3-0.4 distance from base. . . .......7
Laterotergite of abdominal segment I without scales or outer surface of
hindcoxa bare (Atropalpus Section) . . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Laterotergite and outer surface of hindcoxa with scales . . ..... .8
Hindtarsal segments 2 and 3 with conspicuous broad white apical band
(Varipalpus Group—in part Pulchritarsis Section; see Systematics) .
. in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Tian, seoments. 2D asia 3 stan dav scaled or 1 or both with light
Wasa) BAGG oe tadtis reves Fats ear ee es Deas Fes ee
Hypostigial area with patch of white scales and hindtarsus entirely dark
scaled in muelleri—in part Pulchritarsis Section) .
. in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Hypostigial area s usually cee if scaled then hindtarsus with at least 1 light
Dall. Laer « fo aft «had CagtReOte anaes ae 4° 8
Vertex of head usually with narrow curved scales and numerous erect scales;
mesepimeron usually with a single large patch of scales covering most
of sclerite; tarsi varied, but light scales, if present, not restricted to band
at base of segment 1 of alllegs. . . . . . . . Aedes (Protomacleaya)
Vertex of head with broad flat scales except along midline and with few
or no erect scales; mesepimeron usually with 1 or 2 small patches of
scales; if with a single large patch then only tarsal segment | of all legs
with a light basal band (see Systematics). . . . . .Aedes (Howardina)
FEMALE GENITALIA
Cercus obliquely truncate in lateral aspect and with 2-4 strongly developed
setae at apex; tergite IX well developed, moderately to strongly sclero-
tized, rather narrow anteriorly and with a pair of narrow elongate pos-
terior extensions so that it is more or less U- or V-shaped . Haemagogus
Cercus not obliquely truncate in lateral aspect and without strongly de-
veloped setae; tergite IX weakly to moderately developed and sclero-
tized, ‘usually not distinctly U-or Veshaped .... 6 ws ag eee
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
5(4).
6(5).
7(5).
8(7).
9(8).
10(8).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Insula without setae; apical margin of sternite VIII deeply emarginate be-
tween a pair of more strongly sclerotized submedian lobes (aegypti; see
Systematics)... . ... . . Aedes (Stegomyia)
Insula with at least 1 bait of peevicnous elongate ae apical margin
of sternite VIII straight or shallowly emarginate, without differentially
sclerotized subiiedian lobes 9 se ee ee te ee ee
Tergite VIII with scales absent or few (Varipalpus Group—in part Pulchri-
tarsis Section; see Systematics). . . . . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Tersite Vill wath! numerous’scalés 545 ee eer eee eh
Tergite IX reduced to a pair of separate, weakly sclerotized, dorsolateral
plates without setae; postgenital plate with a pair of setae that are as
strongly developed as setae of cercus (Atropalpus Section) . .
; . in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Tergite 1x not reduced to a “pair ‘of dorsolateral plates and usually with
at least 1 pair of setae; postgenital plate with setae that are not as strong-
ly developed as*setacor cereus: 2 Vr Fr Eee er eee LS
Aifial places preser B eh RO ei. og He LOS ee PG
Atrial plates absent. #)
Postgenital plate moderately long and broad; cercus with numerous scales;
basal portion of sree duct not sclerotized (15. mediovittatus)
seats . Aedes (Gymnometopa)
Postgenital plate oie and narrow; cercus without scales; basal portion of
spermathecal duct sclerotized . . . . . . . . Aedes (Protomacleaya)
Tergite IX lobe with 11-17 moderately developed setae; insula with same
degree of sclerotization and Haleass as sigma (12. purpureipes)
. Aedes (Kompia)
Teroite 1X be with 9 or oe setae or inet much more strongly scle-
rOtlged and Digmientcd Milan sigma 6 7%. Te ee. a
Sternite VIII with relatively few conspicuous scales . ....... .9
Sternite VIII with very numerous conspicuous scales ...... . 10
Insula weakly sclerotized and pie iied tergite IX lobe with 1 seta; cercus
with scales (13. papago) . . . fk eges (Abraedes)
Insula strongly sclerotized and pigmented: tergite IX lobe with 5-9 setae;
cercus without scales (14. ramirezi). . . . . . . .Aedes (Aztecaedes)
Postgenital plate with moderately to strongly developed basal median apo-
deme; tergite VIII with conspicuous setae on disc and without a dense
band of outstanding scales distally (16. muelleri—in part Pulchritarsis
DOCHOM). uss . . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Postgenital plate without a Basal ‘median apodeme; tergite VIII usually with-
out conspicuous setae on disc and usually with a dense band of out-
standing scales distally (see Systematics). . . . . .Aedes (Howardina)
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
5(4).
6(5).
7(6).
8(7).
9(8).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 7
MALE GENITALIA
Sternomesal surface of sidepiece with long broad striated scales; paraproct
with striated knob at apex .. . sii Haewiagogus
Sternomesal surface of sidepiece without jong ‘Broad striated scales; para-
proct with. |, or. rately more apical tect ae eis et yee ee
Aedeagus with apical and lateral teeth; cercal setae absent; paraproct with
long sternal arm (aegypti; see Systematics) . . . . . Aedes (Stegomyia)
Aedeagus without apical or lateral teeth; cercal setae present; paraproct
without. sternal: Gran. igo peso ie aa ocean ete geet
Claspette represented by a small basal lobe or large plaque on sternomesal
margin of sidepiece and never bearing a single long, strong, curved fila-
ment (see Systematics). . . . . . . .Aedes (Howardina)
Claspette developed as a columnar stem projectine caudad mesad of side-
piece and bearing a single, long, strong, curved filament ..... .4
Proctiger unusually long in dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization nearly
horizontal (13. papago) . . . . Aedes (Abraedes)
Proctiger not unusually long in dorsal Aspect, the ‘basolateral sclerotization
HACGMY VerUlCal 456 SMe ee LS AMIR A RIES pee em, | MS BR LN ae
Tergite IX without sclerotized lobes and without setae (Atropalpus Section)
. in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Tergite IX ‘with small to ae sclerotized lobes bearing 2 or more setae . .6
Claspette stem with 2 strongly developed, elongate setae arising on dorsal
surface distally (14. ramirezi) . . . . . . .Aedes (Aztecaedes)
Claspette stem without strongly developed setae PaAaie CM Rade cs hs cag OE OM |
Claspette filament with a distinct, large, retrorse angle on convex side;
spiniform of clasper long, 0.5-0.7 length of clasper, and basal tergomesal
area of sidepiece with a single, long, strong, differentiated seta (15. medio-
vittatus) . . . . . . Aedes (Gymnometopa)
Claspette fitenient autliont distinct Foun angle; spiniform shorter than
0.4 of clasper length and/or basal tergomesal area of sidepiece without
a lone: strong; differentiated’ seta’ 2) ho. <a ee a eg tee re Rl Pd
Aedeagus distinctly expanded distally in dorsal aspect; tergite IX lobe with
8-17 setae in several series (12. purpureipes) . . . . . Aedes (Kompia)
Aedeagus not expanded distally in dorsal aspect; fergite IX lobe with 2-
10’ setae ina single or partially double series (20. eee ae Pee i 9
Basal tergomesal area of sidepiece with clump of few to very numerous
weakly to moderately developed setae; clasper without setae on outer
surface near apex; spiniform of clasper long, 0.3-0.6 length of clasper
4 . Aedes (Protomacleaya)
Basal tereomiedal area of Ridepicce ae 1 or more long, strong, differenti-
ated setae; clasper with 1 or 2 setae on outer surface near apex; spini-
form of claspershort, 072-0.3 tenet of clasper 2". ere, Se
10(9).
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
5(4).
6(5).
7(6).
8(7).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Tergal surface of sidepiece with numerous scales among the shorter setae;
aedeagus usually broadest in middle and more or less barrel-shaped in
dorsal aspect (16. muelleri—in part Pulchritarsis Section)
. in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Tergal mupiace ‘of sidepiece without scales or with very few scales among
the shorter setae; aedeagus usually broadest at base and slightly tapered
distally in dorsal aspect (Varipalpus Group—in part Pulchritarsis Section;
see Systematics) . . ...... . . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
PUPAE
[Aedes (Howardina), Varipalpus Group of Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
and Terrens Group of Aedes (Protomacleaya) not included ]
Float hair (1-I) usually displaced mesad and 1-II usually displaced laterad,
so that distance between alveoli of float hairs is usually less than 0.6
distance between alveoli of hairs 1-II .... . . . Haemagogus
Distance between alveoli of float hairs usually greater than 0.7 distance
Dei Weer alveoli iat belie invent os ant wiles taaitoe - ted
Hair 6-C longer and stronger than 7-C aeaiae see Systematics) ...
<es . Aedes ( (Stegomyia)
Hair 6-C shorter and weaker than ue eal or
Paddle with long filamentous marginal spicules (13. papago) . .
F Aedes s (Abraedes)
Paddle without lone filamentous marginal spicules .
Tergites II-VI or VII with a long, strong, irregular transverse ridge slightly
caudad of level of hair 0; midrib of paddle conspicuous only basally
(14. ramirezi) ... . . .Aedes (Aztecaedes)
Tergites II-VI or VII without: a dcansyetse: ridge caudad of level of hair 0
or midrib of paddle conspicuous to or nearly to apex of paddle . . . .5
Hair 6-VII strongly developed, longer and stronger than 6-VI and 9-VII
(15. mediovittatus) . . anid Aedes (Gymnometopa)
Hair 6-VII weakly to moderately. developed, weaker and shorter than 6-
Vivand/or-9-Vib eo atte ber ; omer oe 6G
Paddle as broad as or broader than long (Atropalpus Section) :
. in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Paddle disinedy bangs (iad bread Biet, betes POR erotas. . 47
Hair 5-IV,V short, 0.4-0.7 length of corresponding tergite (12. purpureipes)
iy . Aedes (Kompia)
Hit Ss IV Vv moderately loti " one 1. 0- Ja 2 feneth of Cage aie tergite
Hair 1-V or VI to VII much more weakly developed than hair 1 of immed-
iately preceding segments; 6-IIJ-VI relatively strongly developed (16. muel-
peas
a
4(1).
5(4).
6(5).
7(4).
8(7).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 9
leri—in part Pulchritarsis Section). . . . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Hair 1-V or VI to VII not conspicuously weaker than hair 1 of immedi-
ately preceding segments; 6-III-VI weakly to moderately developed
in part Aedes (Protomacleaya)
LARVAE
Hair 3-VII strongly developed, very long, usually single (single or double) . 2
Hair 3-VII weakly to moderately developed, short, single to multiple. . .4
Pecten of siphon strongly arcuate dorsad distally; comb scales with | or
2 long and usually 1-3 shorter unfringed spines from a large basal plate
(15. mediovittatus) . ... . . . . . Aedes (Gymnometopa)
Pecten of siphon more or less ahr tre comb aang with a single fringed
or serrate apical projection from a small base ..........3
Hair 9-III-V as long and strong as or longer and stronger than hair 7 of
corresponding segment; 12-I absent (see Systematics) .
. Aedes ( Newivdina)
iit 9- IIL-V aes? mal wens ee fair 7 of corresponding segment and/
or TZ present 2 0. Pl ae ne PP ees pe ee eres
Ventral brush (hair 4-X) arising from a weakly to strongly sclerotized boss
Ventral brush artine *ivomy ame A ee ed ee ne
Boss of ventral brush weakly sclerotized; siphon without acus; labial plate
subquadrate (13. papago). . . . . . . . . Aedes (Abraedes)
Boss of ventral brush strongly alneanineds eerie with distinct acus; labial
plate distinctly netrowed apicallyiiuesiity) scape 2 othe, bere. ee}
Integument of thorax and abdomen with conspicuous simple spicules; pecten
of siphon relatively long, more or less straight; comb scales with long
unfringed apical spine (12. purpureipes) . . . . . . . Aedes (Kompia)
Integument of thorax and abdomen without conspicuous spicules; pecten
of siphon short, conspicuously arcuate dorsad distally or oblique; comb
scales fringed (14. ramirezi). . . . . .. . . . Aedes (Aztecaedes)
Comb scales with long median spine and strong basal spinules; ventral brush
with 5 pairs of hairs (aegypti; see Systematics). . . . Aedes (Stegomyia)
Comb scales usually fringed; if with long median spine, then without strong
basal spinules and ventral brush with more than 5 pairsof hairs . . . .8
Comb scales with long unfringed apical spine; most caudal hair of ventral
brush (4a-X) short; ventral brush with 7 pairs of hairs (16. muelleri—in
part Pulchritarsis Section) Oi? . . in part Aedes (Ochlerotatus)
Comb scales fringed, the apical element of the fringe rarely produced into
moderately long spine; most caudal hair of ventral brush usually long,
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
if short then ventral brush with only 6 pairsof hairs . ...... .9
9(8). Ventral brush with 6 pairs of hairs and the more caudal hairs (4a-c-X)
single or double ee Group—in part Pulchritarsis Section; see
Systematics). . . . . . . in part Aedes ( Ochlerotatus)
Ventral brush varied, but never with 6 pairs of hairs and the more caudal
hairs single or double eee aon mirth Pele eis SacetekO
10(9). Hair 5-I]-IV moderately to strongly developed; comb scales not irregularly
cleft and distal pecten teeth not strongly detached :
eae Aedes (Porpeneeava )
Hat efL- IV weakly ‘developed: comb scales irregularly cleft or distal pec-
ten teeth ai detached si as cal Section) . .
wae : . in part hiedes ( Bieiierovitus)
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
Genus AEDES Meigen
1818. Aedes Meigen, 1818:13. TYPE SPECIES: Aedes cinereus Meigen, 1818, Europe; mono-
basic.
For complete synonymy see Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959).
Subgenus PROTOMACLEAYA Theobald
1904. Gualteria Lutz, 1904a:13, 1904b:4. TYPE SPECIES: Gualteria oswaldi Lutz, 1904,
Brazil; first of 2 included species, selection of Brunetti (1914:61). Preoccupied by
Gualteria Agassiz, 1872.
1907. Protomacleaya Theobald, 1907:253-254. TYPE SPECIES: Culex triseriatus Say, 1823,
United States of America; monobasic and original designation.
Protomacleaya of Theobald (1907:253-254; 1910:250, in part).
Aedes (Gualteria) in part of Lutz (1904a:13); Dyar (1918:79); Vargas (1950:62-63); Vargas
and Downs (1950:161-172).
Aedes (Finlaya) in part of most authors.
FEMALES. Dark scales of palpus, proboscis, legs, wing and abdomen with blue
or violet reflections. Head: Eyes narrowly separated above antennae, the result-
ing space with light narrow curved scales. Integument yellow to tan or brown
to black. Frontal bristles strongly developed, 1-3 pairs. Orbital bristles relatively
few, mesal 2-5 pairs strongly developed, lateral 4 or 5 pairs moderately devel-
oped. Vertex and occiput with numerous narrow curved decumbent scales and
numerous erect scales. Orbital line of light narrow curved scales present. Dorso-
lateral, lateral and ventral surfaces with broad flat scales. Clypeus moderately large,
bare. Proboscis relatively stout, longer than to subequal in length to forefemur;
entirely dark scaled; with a few basal bristles. Palpus moderately long, about 0.22-
0.29 of proboscis; 3- or 4-segmented, segment 4 very small to minute when pres-
ent; segments 1-3 with bristles; entirely dark scaled. Antenna subequal in length
Zavortink: New World Aedes 11
to proboscis or slightly longer; torus frequently without scales, scales small and
inconspicuous when present; flagellar segment 1 longer than 2, usually slightly
swollen, with small scales; flagellar segments 2-13 usually with 6 moderate bristles
in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments 3-13 slightly longer than preceding.
Thorax: Integument yellow to tan or brown to black. Acrostichal and dorso-
central bristles in complete well developed rows or reduced in number and extent
and then sometimes totally absent from disc; prescutellar and supraalar bristles
numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bris-
tles varying from numerous and well developed to absent; | parascutellar bristle
present. Scutellum with 4-10 strong bristles on midlobe, 3-10 on lateral lobe.
Mesoscutum completely covered with narrow curved scales except for anterior
inner dorsocentral and median and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; pattern varied.
Scutellum with narrow curved and/or broad flat scales on midlobe, narrow curved
scales on lateral lobe; color of scales varied. Paratergite broad, with patch of light
scales. Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong suture. Meron
large. Pleuron with bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, stp, pra and upper mep; stp
bristles in long row from psp bristles to below lower margin of mep; ssp and low-
er mep bristles absent. Apn with broad and/or narrow curved scales, neither type
closely appressed; ppn nearly entirely covered with scales, these narrow curved
and/or broad flat; broad scales in patches on ppl, stp below pra, stp caudad of
ssp area, stp cephalodorsad of midcoxa, and in a single large patch extending
from upper bristles nearly to lower margin on mep; additional patch usually on
ssp and sometimes on pst, psp and metameron; pcx and hypostigial scales ab-
sent. Legs: Hindcoxa subequal in size to or smaller than midcoxa, its base far
below upper margin of meron. Legs moderately long, the forefemur about 1.18-
1.40 times distance from top of thorax to tip of midcoxa. Forecoxa with light
or light and dark scales on outer surface; midcoxa and hindcoxa with light scales
on outer surface. Forefemur and midfemur dark scaled with light scales in at
least basal 0.5 of posterior and sometimes dorsal and/or ventral surfaces and some-
times at base on anterior surface; hindfemur light scaled in at least basal 0.5,
dark scaled in apical portion; light scales on posterior and/or ventral surfaces of
all femora sometimes extending to apex. Knee spots small to large, white to sil-
ver; largest on hindleg, sometimes absent on foreleg. Tibiae basically dark scaled,
sometimes with basal light patch or ring or light streak on posterior surface. Tarsi
varied. Claws of foreleg and midleg with acute submedian tooth; claws of hind-
leg varied. Wing: Entirely dark scaled or with light scales at base of costa and/or
vein R. Plume scales present on dorsum of veins Rs, R,+3, R2, R3, M basad of
furcation, and less conspicuously on apical portion of 1A. Haltere: Knob light
and/or dark scaled. Abdomen: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally. Lat-
erotergite with large patch of white or silver scales. Segments VI and VII com-
pletely scaled. Without outstanding scales. Ornamentation varied.
FEMALE GENITALIA (figs. 5,14). Segment VII: Tergite semielliptical in shape,
length along midline about 0.55-0.65 length of tergite VII; distal 0.65-0.75 with
scales and bristles. Sternite long, about 1.2-1.4 length of tergite, much broader
distally than basally; distal margin broadly emarginate; all but narrow basal and
lateral portions with scales or bristles, the latter predominating; bristles more
numerous along midline and distal margin, largely weakly developed and short,
but some moderately developed and elongate. Tergite 1X: Deeply notched apically,
maximum length about 0.45-0.55 of tergite VIII; moderately sclerotized; apical
lobe with 1-7 fine short bristles. Jnsula: Weakly sclerotized; connected to sigma;
12 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
with 2-5 pairs of moderately developed bristles. Cercus: Long, length of dorsal
edge 0.85-0.95 length of tergite VIII; compressed; apex rounded in lateral view;
bristles numerous apically, the largest moderately developed; scales absent. Post-
genital Plate: Long and narrow, length 0.65-0.80 of tergite VIII; index about 2.8-
3.3; apex rounded in ventral view; distal portion with numerous weakly developed
bristles; basal median longitudinal apodeme strongly sclerotized. Cowl: Strongly
sclerotized. Atrial plates moderately large, strongly sclerotized. Sigma: Continuous
with cowl; weakly to moderately sclerotized. Basal portion of spermathecal duct
strongly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized, more or less spherical,
1 slightly larger than others.
MALES. Essentially as in females except for sexual characters. Head: Proboscis
relatively stout. Palpus subequal in length to or slightly longer than proboscis;
5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.62-0.67 length
of palpus; segment 4 short, 0.16-0.18 length of palpus; segment 5 short, 0.12-
0.15 length of palpus; palpus slender except for swollen apex of segment 3
and swollen segment 4; apex of segment 3 upturned, segments 4 and 5 droop-
ing; apex of segment 3 and all of segments 4 and 5 with long bristles; usually
completely dark scaled. Antenna subequal in length to or slightly shorter than
proboscis; torus much enlarged, bare; flagellum strongly plumose, segments 1-12
with very numerous long bristles; flagellar segment | slightly elongate, with scales;
flagellar segments 12 and 13 elongate, subequal in length or penultimate longer,
the 2 combined nearly equal to total length of first 11 segments. Legs: Claws of
foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw with blunt submedian tooth and
with or without an acute basal external tooth; smaller claw with acute submed-
ian tooth. Claws of hindleg small, varied. Abdomen: Apical segments and geni-
talia not conspicuously bent ventrad.
MALE GENITALIA. Predominantly various shades of straw-yellow to brown
with apex of paraproct dark brown to black. Segment VIII: Tergite long; 0.78-
0.98 length of sternite; exserted, apical 0.50-0.70 scaled. Segment IX: Well de-
veloped; middorsal portion of tergite weakly to moderately sclerotized, at or cau-
dad of level of base of sidepiece; tergite lobes prominent, narrowly to broadly
connected middorsally, each with 1-9 moderately to strongly developed setae in
1 series; sternite large, with 2-8 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, usually
subcylindrical to subconical; mesal surface membranous from base to apex; basal
tergomesal area slightly to conspicuously swollen, with few to numerous weak-
ly to moderately developed setae; apical lobe absent; median sternomesal scle-
rite absent to well developed and then with a conspicuous tuft of setae; sterno-
mesal surface without long broad striated scales; dorsal, lateral and ventral sur-
faces with numerous scales and bristles; bristles of ventral surface not specialized.
Claspette: Well developed; stem short, straight in dorsal aspect; spiculose; with 2-
6 weakly developed setae; filament long, subterete to distinctly flattened apically,
curved or angled dorsad, with or without ridge on convex side, without retrorse
barb. Clasper: Simple, short, swollen subbasally; median portion straight, with
longitudinal ridges or wrinkles; basal portion spiculose; apical portion with 1 or
2 fine setae on inner surface, none on outer surface; apical spiniform long, 0.35-
0.50 length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderately large, without teeth;
base slightly bulbous, remainder subparallel-sided with truncate apex in dorsal as-
pect. Proctiger: Strongly developed; not unusually long in dorsal aspect, the baso-
lateral sclerotization vertical; paraproct well sclerotized, with a single large, very
heavily sclerotized curved apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 3-6.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 13
PUPAE. Cephalothorax: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair
5-C moderately to strongly developed, short to moderately long, never reaching
more than 0.6 distance from its base to that of trumpet. Trumpet: Light golden
brown to dark brown in color. Broadening gradually from base to apex; trach-
eoid sculpturing relatively well developed in basal 0.11-0.21; reticulate sculptur-
ing strong. Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter posteriorly. Ter-
gites II-VII without a strong transverse ridge anteriorly. Hair 1-II weakly to strong-
ly developed, usually 3-7b (1-14); hair 1-III-V subequally developed, weak to mod-
erately strong, usually with fewer [1-5 (1-8)], shorter and finer branches than 1-
II; hair 1-VI,VII weakly to moderately developed, subequal to 1-III-V or slightly
smaller, usually 1-4b (1-5). Hair 2-III-V mesad or laterad of hair 1 of corres-
ponding segment. Hair 5-IV,V 1.0-2.2 length of corresponding tergite; 5-VII mod-
erately long to long, usually single (single or double), weaker and shorter or strong-
er and longer than 4-VII. Hair 6-III-VI subequally developed, moderately long,
fine to moderately strong; 6-VII shorter and finer than 6-III-VI. Hair 8-VI,VII ven-
tral. Hair 9-III-VI subequally developed, short to relatively long, fine to stout,
caudad of the level of hair 6 of the corresponding segment (except possibly in
knabi); 9-VII near or moderately cephalad of caudolateral angle of segment, with
1 or 2 (1-4) moderately long to long primary branches; 9-VIII at or slightly mesad
of caudolateral angle of segment; with 3-5 (2-7) long; strong primary branches.
Hair 10-VI relatively close to 11-VI. Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe mod-
erately large, about 1.1-1.4 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length always greater
than width. Apex produced, pointed, rounded or subtruncate. Midrib conspicuous
to or nearly to apex; without wrinkled area near apex. Without long marginal
spicules. Hair 1-P short to moderately long, usually single (single or double).
LARVAE. Head: Lightly to moderately pigmented, lightened in ocular area,
darkened posteriorly. Labial plate distinctly narrowed anteriorly. Hair 1-C usu-
ally stout (fine in knabi). Hairs 4,6-C displaced caudad, not near labrum. Hair
4-C weakly to strongly developed, 2-24b; mesad or laterad of 1-C and cephalad
or caudad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C single to multiple; more or less in line with
6-C. Hair 6-C single to multiple; distinctly laterad of 1-C. Hair 7-C usually 3-11b
(2-13). Hair 15-C usually short to moderately long and 2,3b (1-3) (long and 25-
35b in knabi). Mental plate with 9-12 (8-13) teeth on each side of median tooth.
Antenna: Shaft with or without small spicules. Hair 1-A moderately long, usually
single (1-3b). Thorax: Epidermis and fat body with or without pigment. Integu-
ment without spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P separate. Hair 1-M moderately
long to long, branched; 1-T usually moderately long, branched. Hair 4-P branched.
Hair 5-P usually branched (single in knabi); 5-M single. Hair 11-P usually much
shorter than 9-P, sometimes enlarged and up to 0.6 length of 9-P; hair 11-M,T
much shorter than 9-P. Hair 13-T moderately to strongly developed, usually 2-
7b (2-10); subequal in size to 14-M or slightly larger. Hair 14-M weakly to strong-
ly developed, usually 3-9b (2-11). Abdomen: Hair 1-I weakly to strongly devel-
oped, usually 3-8b (2-10); hair 1-IV,V strongly developed, usually 2-7b (1-8).
Hair 2-III-V laterad or mesad of hair 1 of corresponding segment; usually sin-
gle or double (1-4b) (3-6b and stellate on III and IV in chionotum). Hair 3-
VII weakly to moderately developed, usually 2-4b (1-5), short. Hair 5-II-IV mod-
erately to strongly developed, usually 2-7b (1-9). Hair 6-III-V usually double.
Hair 9-III-V usually single or double (1-3b). Hair 11-I weakly to strongly devel-
oped, usually 3-8b (2-11). Hair 12-I usually present (absent in zoosophus). Hair
13-I weakly to strongly developed, usually 2-6b (2-8); hair 13-IV,V strongly de-
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
veloped, usually 2-8b (1-9); hair 13-VI usually with numerous [6-13 (3-18)] short
fine branches and usually cephalad of the level of 10-VI [with fewer (4) longer
and stronger branches and then sometimes distinctly cephalolaterad or laterad
of 10-VI in sandrae]. Segment VIII: Hairs 1 and 2 separated. Hair 1 moderate-
ly to strongly developed, usually 3-8b (1-9). Comb scales small to moderate in
size; fringed; relatively few (8-15) in 1 or more regular or irregular rows or num-
erous (16-58) in a patch. Siphon: Moderately to strongly pigmented. Short to
moderately long, index 1.7-5.0. Acus small to moderate in size. Pecten teeth
with numerous irregular basal denticles; 13-47 in a more or less straight even row.
Hair 1-S slightly distad of pecten; moderately to strongly developed, 1-5b. Anal
Segment: Saddle small to large; without spines on caudal margin; moderately to
strongly pigmented. Hair 1-X moderately to strongly developed, usually 2-7b (1-
9) (single in knabi). Hair 2-X usually 4-6b (3-9). Hair 3-X single. Ventral brush
(4-X) weakly to strongly developed; with 5 (hendersoni, brelandi), 6 (most species)
or 7 (zoosophus, knabi) pairs of hairs; all but most proximal 1 or 2 hairs on grid;
hair 4a-X usually long (shortened in sandrae), 3-6b; hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b
(2-5) [regularly double (2,3b) in hendersoni, apparently 5-7b in knabi]. Anal gills
varied.
DISCUSSION. The subgenus Protomacleaya is characterized as follows: in 1 the
adults by the combination of (1) the narrowly separated to partially contiguous
eyes, (2) the usual presence of numerous erect scales and narrow curved scales
on the vertex of the head, (3) the ornamentation of the mesoscutum, which is
usually dark scaled with anterior lateral or lateral silver or white markings, (4)
the 3 distinct patches of scales on the sternopleuron, (5) the large patch of scales
on the paratergite and laterotergite, (6) the usually single large patch of scales
on the mesepimeron, (7) the completely scaled posterior pronotum with the
scales usually broad and flat, (8) the relatively stout proboscis, and (9) the us-
ually entirely dark scaled proboscis and palpus; in the male genitalia by (1) the
shape of the aedeagus, which is usually rounded and slightly expanded basally,
more or less parallel-sided distally, and truncate apically, (2) the frequent devel-
opment of at least a weak sternomesal sclerite and tuft, and the combination
of (3) the lobes of tergite IX, which bear 1-9 setae in a single series, (4) the
patch of few to very numerous weakly to moderately developed setae in the basal
tergomesal area of the sidepiece, (5) the absence of numerous long, strong se-
tae along the apical portion of the sternomesal surface of the sidepiece, (6) the
relatively short clasper without setae on the outer surface near the apex, and (7)
the relatively long spiniform; in the pupae by the combination of (1) the absence
of a transverse anterior ridge on tergites II-VII, (2) the usually strongly pigmented
trumpet, (3) the usually relatively strongly developed and long branches of hair
1-II, (4) the moderately long to long 5-IV,V, and (5) the usually fine 9-III-VI;
and, in the larvae by the combination of (1) the weakly to moderately developed,
short, 2-6b (1-7) hair 3-VII, (2) the moderately to strongly developed 5-II-IV,
(3) the usual presence of 12-I, (4) the comb scales, which are fringed and num-
erous enough to form a large patch in most species, and (5) the development
of the ventral brush, which arises from a grid and is moderately to strongly de-
veloped, with 6-8 pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X 3-12b, in most species.
Protomacleaya, with more than 40 species, is the dominant subgenus of tree-
hole-breeding Aedes in the New World. Although the subgenus is quite diverse,
is defined mainly on negative characters, and many of the included species depart
from the “‘normal’’ in 1 or more characteristics of 1 or more stages, it is, I believe,
Zavortink: New World Aedes 15
natural because of the basically similar male genitalia of virtually all species. There
is no morphological evidence to indicate that Protomacleaya is related to any
other Middle American group of treehole-breeding Aedes, and I suspect that this
subgenus has been produced by radiation following the independent, relatively
recent invasion of this habitat by a ground-pool breeding form in Middle America.
To the north, in Mexico, the United States, and Canada, the distributions of
Protomacleaya and the Pulchritarsis Section of Ochlerotatus are basically com-
plementary; while I would usually interpret this as a sign of relationship, I do
not believe that can be the explanation in this case.
The species of Protomacleaya fall into 5 groups. Four of these, the monotypic
Knabi and Zoosophus Groups and the larger Kompi and Triseriatus Groups, are
treated in the present study; the fifth and largest group, Terrens, has been re-
vised by Schick (1970a,b). The 5 groups appear to be distinguishable only in the
adult and larval stages. Even the 4 small groups treated here can be separated
only with difficulty in the pupal stage and male genitalia.
Since the groups of Protomacleaya differ most conspicuously in adult orna-
mentation, particularly tarsal banding, their relationship was not detected by Ed-
wards (1932) or Knight and Marks (1952), and the species of Protomacleaya
known to these authors are scattered throughout several of the major groups (B,
F; and H) of ':Finiaya:”
The description of Protomacleaya is based on only the 4 groups treated here;
the diagnosis, though, does include the Terrens Group, which has also been added
to the keys to the adults and larvae.
The immatures of Protomacleaya are found primarily in treeholes and occa-
sionally in broken or cut bamboo internodes, artificial containers, rockholes, co-
conut shells and pitcher plants.
Protomacleaya extends from southern Canada to northern Argentina and south-
eastern Brazil; it is absent from the West Indies. The Triseriatus, Kompi and Ter-
rens Groups replace each other geographically; the Zoosophus Group occurs with
the Triseriatus Group in the southcentral United States and the Knabi Group is
found with the Terrens Group in southern Mexico.
KEYS TO GROUPS
ADULTS
iy, Integument of head and thorax yellow to tan; scales of head and meso-
scutum largely yellow to golden; claws of hindleg with an acute sub-
median tooth in both sexes(11.knabi) . . . . .. . . Knabi Group
Integument of head and thorax brown to Black: scales of head and meso-
scutum usually largely dark brown to black and white to silver-white,
sometimes partially yellowish, creamish-tan or golden brown (Zoosophus
Group); claws of hindleg simple in both sexes
2(1). Tarsal segments 1-5 of all legs entirely dark scaled . . . Triseriatus Group
Some tarsal segments marked with white .........-.. .3
3(2). Tarsal segments 1-3 or 4 of foreleg and midleg and tarsal segments 1-4 or
5 of hindleg with conspicuous basal white band (4. zoosophus) .
Zoosophus Group
16
4(3).
2(1).
64 8
3(2).
2(1).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Tarsal segments 3-5 usually entirely dark scaled . . ....... .4
Hindtarsus with a conspicuous band over joint between segments 1 and 2
and/or hindfemur with a dark basal band. . . . . . .lerrens Group
Hindtarsus without a band over joint between sepments 1 and 2; hind-
femur without adark basalband. . ..... . . . .Kompi ‘Group
MALE GENITALIA
(Terrens Group not included)
Setae of basal tergomesal area of sidepiece arising from a differentially
sclerotized plaque (11. knabi). . . . . . . . . Knabi Group
Setae of basal tergomesal area of Sidepieds. not Aeitis from a differentially
Sects ere me er ee oe a en ae oe see ag
Aedeagus relatively short and broad (length 1.7-2.0 times maximum width)
and median sternomesal tuft of sidepiece weakly to moderately developed
. . . Kompi Group
ener itively jong anid sender (engi i : -2. 3 times maximum width)
or median sternomesal tuft of sidepiece strongly developed .... .3
Median sternomesal tuft of sidepiece very weakly developed and incon-
spicuous (4. zoosophus) . . . . . . . Loosophus Group
Median sternomesal tuft of sidépiecé nisaeiately to strongly developed and
conspicuous to very conspicuous. . .. . . . . . Triseriatus Group
PUPAE
(Terrens Group not included)
Hairs 4,8-C very strongly developed and long . . . . . . Kompi Group
Hairs 4 ,8-C weakly to strongly developed and short a, See ee or es
Hair 6-I,II strongly developed, as stout as or stouter than 3-I,II; hair 9-III-
VI stout and relatively long (4. zoosophus). . . . . Zoosophus Group
Hair 6-I,1] moderately developed, much finer than 3-I,II; hair 9-III-VI fine,
SET a PTV OT ue ae ee gas i ean vip te ae
Apex of paddle rounded or subtruncate . . . . . . Triseriatus Group
Apex of paddle pointed or produced (11. knabi).. . . . . » Knabi Group
LARVAE
Hair 15-C long, 25-35b; hair 1-C fine; mental plate with 1 or 2 lateral
teeth much enlarged (11. knabi) . . . . . . Knabi Group
Hair 15-C short to moderately long, 1-3b: Be 1-C stout; mental plate
without conspicuously eniarecdlaloral.f6eth yo oes ek eee se 2
Hair 4-C well developed, with 8-24 long branches, nearer to longitudinal mid-
line of head than to 6-C; comb scales relatively few, 10-13 (8-15), in
1 or 2 regular or irregular rows ee Pane ; . a
Zavortink: New World Aedes 17
Hair 4-C weakly developed, with 2-7 (2-11) short branches, usually nearer
to 6-C than to longitudinal midline of head; comb scales relatively num-
érous, 20-100 asually aw ar patel i> 6g cers dat a ater oo Od ae
3(2). Saddle of anal segment large, extending 0.65-0.80 distance down lateral
surface of segment, with a narrow lightened or transparent ventral mar-
ginal or submarginal area; ventral brush tie with 7 pairs of hairs; hair
12-I absent (4. zoosophus) . . . } . . . Zoosophus Group
Saddle of anal segment small to moderate in size, extending 0.40-0.65 dis-
tance down lateral surface of segment, without a narrow lightened or
transparent ventral marginal or submarginal area; ventral brush with 5
or 6 pairs of hairs; hair 12-I present. . . . . . . . Triseriatus Group
4(2). Ventral brush with 6 pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (2-5)
. . Kompi Group
Vevtual brush with 5.9 pili of hairs: i witli éi pairs then 4b ,4c-X usually
ST Oba S- 23005 isis, ‘ : PeLURY Jot: Terrens4sroup
TRISERIATUS GROUP
FEMALES. Head: Integument brown to black. Erect scales usually unicolorous,
white to amber. Narrow curved scales usually unicolorous, white to silver-white
(dark brown in Florida triseriatus). Thorax: Integument brown to black. Acros-
tichal, anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles
numerous and well developed or much reduced in number and size or even mostly
absent except on anterior promontory. Mesoscutum with background of small dark
brown or black scales with varied pattern of larger white, silver-white, dingy silver-
white or even yellowish or tannish scales (Florida triseriatus), as follows: (1) short
to long broad patch on median anterior promontory usually developed, (2) nar-
row broken or complete acrostichal line sometimes developed, (3) narrow to broad
lateral prescutellar line usually developed, (4) narrow broken or complete poster-
ior outer dorsocentral line sometimes developed, and (5) broad to very broad
lateral marginal line extending from anterior promontory to wing root and mesad
along scutal suture usually developed. Midlobe of scutellum with scales dense,
mostly broad and flat, usually silver, sometimes dark. Ppn scales predominantly
broad and flat, usually white to silver-white; psp scales present or absent; ssp scales
usually present; pst and metameron normally bare. Legs: Tarsi entirely dark scaled
or with an inconspicuous pale longitudinal streak on posterior and/or ventral sur-
face of 1 or more basal segments. Claws of hindleg simple. Wing: Base of costa
with or without a small light patch. Base of vein R with or without a very small
light patch. Abdomen: Tergites II-VII usually dark scaled with basolateral light
patch. Basal sternites light scaled; distal dark scaled with basolateral light patch
or light basal band that is broader laterally.
MALES. Essentially as in females except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus
entirely dark scaled; with few to numerous long bristles from apex of segment
3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum usually more extensively light scaled than in fe-
males, rarely entirely light scaled. Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with
or without an acute basal external tooth; claws of hindleg simple. Wing: Remig-
ium (base of vein R) dark scaled or entirely or partially light scaled to about
level of crossvein h.
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
MALE GENITALIA. Sidepiece: Usually weakly to moderately pigmented. Basal
tergomesal area slightly to conspicuously swollen; setae of basal tergomesal tuft
few to numerous, not arising from a differentially sclerotized plaque; median sterno-
mesal sclerite moderately to strongly developed; median sternomesal tuft mod-
erately to strongly developed, the setae sometimes strongly curved dorsad. Clasp-
ette: Filament evenly curved or angulate. Phallosome: Aedeagus relatively long
and slender, length usually 2.0-2.3 (1.8-2.4) greatest width.
PUPAE. Hairs largely moderately strong and moderately pigmented. Cephalo-
thorax: Hairs 4,8-C weakly to moderately developed, short; 8-C shorter and finer
than 9-C. Trumpet: Light golden brown to brown. Abdomen: Branches of hair
1-II weakly to moderately developed, short. Hair 6-I,II moderately developed, us-
ually much finer than 3-I,II. Hair 9-III-VI fine, short to relatively long. Paddle:
Apex rounded or subtruncate.
LARVAE. Head: Labrum more or less evenly rounded in dorsal aspect. Hair
1-C stout, arising on or near front edge of labrum. Hair 4-C well developed, with
numerous (8-24) long branches; closer to midline than to 6-C. Hair 5-C 1-3b.
Hair 6-C 1-5b. Hair 7-C 5-13b. Hair 15-C short to moderately long, 1-3b. Mental
plate distinctly triangular, lateral teeth not conspicuously enlarged. Antenna: Shaft
smooth or with a few spicules. Thorax: Pigment present or absent. Hairs 1,5-P
branched. Abdomen: Hair 12-I present. Segment VIII: Comb scales usually 10-
13 (9-15), in 1 or 2 irregular rows. Siphon: Index 2.2-3.5. Acus attached or de-
tached, sometimes removed from base of siphon. Pecten teeth short to long, mod-
erately to darkly pigmented; 13-30. Anal Segment: Saddle small to moderate in
size, extending 0.40-0.65 down lateral surface of segment; without a lightened
or transparent ventral marginal or submarginal area. Hair 1-X 1-9b. Ventral brush
with 5 or 6 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X usually 2-4b (2-5). Gills sausage-shaped
or tapered; dorsal subequal to ventral or longer, 0.5-4.5 length of saddle.
DISCUSSION. The Triseriatus Group is characterized as follows: in the adults
by the dark tarsi; in the male genitalia by the combination of (1) the weak to
moderate pigmentation, (2) the absence of a differentially sclerotized plaque in
the basal tergomesal area, (3) the moderately to strongly developed sternomesal
tuft, and (4) the usually relatively long slender aedeagus; in the pupae by the com-
bination of (1) the short hairs 4,8-C, (2) the weak 6-I,II and 9-III-VI, and (3)
the rounded or subtruncate apex of the paddle; and in the larvae by the combina-
tion of (1) the well developed hair 4-C, (2) the usually 10-13 (8-15) comb scales
arranged in 1 or 2 irregular rows, and (3) the ventral brush, which has 5 or 6
pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X 2-4b (2-5).
This group contains at least 3 species, triseriatus, hendersoni and brelandi. Aedes
triseriatus is conspicuously differentiated from the other 2 in the adult and larval
stages and male genitalia. Aedes hendersoni and brelandi differ in relatively few
characters of the adults, pupae and larvae.
The light scaling of the mesoscutum of species in this group is usually more
extensive in males than in females and is frequently less extensive in depauperate
individuals of both sexes. This must be considered when identifying specimens
on the basis of the mesoscutal pattern.
The immature stages of species in the Triseriatus Group are characteristically
found in rot cavities in trees, stumps and logs and in water-holding crotches of
trees. They have also been found in artificial containers, pitcher plants and rock-
holes. Females of all 3 species are known to bite humans.
The Triseriatus Group is restricted to North America, where it extends from
Zavortink: New World Aedes 19
southern Canada to northern Mexico. Two of the species, hendersoni and triser-
iatus, are widespread and sympatric; the third, brelandi, is presently known from
a limited area of southwestern Texas that is outside the range of both other
species. The distributions attributed to the species of this group are based solely
on the material that I have examined because, in most instances, it is impossible
to tell to which species published records of triseriatus refer.
2(1).
ET):
KEYS TO SPECIES
ADULTS
Bristles of anterior portion of mesoscutum relatively few and predominantly
weakly developed, the fossa not completely bordered by setae and rarely
more than | or 2 of the setae conspicuous; light scaling of fossa reduced,
usually restricted to a narrow or broad stripe along lateral and posterior
portions; base of costal vein of female completely dark scaled or with
only a few light scales; palpus of male with relatively few long bristles
from apex of segment 3 distad (fig. 2)... . . . . . 3. triseriatus
Bristles of anterior portion of mesoscutum relatively numerous and well
developed, the fossa more or less bordered on all sides by conspicuous
setae; light scaling of fossa usually extensive and extending mesad of
anterior dorsocentral bristles; base of costal vein of female usually with
small but conspicuous white patch; palpus of male with numerous long
bristles: tromcapexof seoment:.3 distad™ aig ks A ee Pe, Kees Se ee
Psp scale patch absent to small in female, usually absent in male; bristles
around fossa of female lightly to moderately pigmented (fig. 2)
. 1. hendersoni
Psp eeale patel farge i in female, Geually email. in ake prietics around fossa
of female more darkly pismented (f396.. 2 5) ar create, vat a ere ONebd
MALE GENITALIA
Tergal surface of sidepiece conspicuously constricted at level of claspette
filament; setae of mesal half of middle portion of tergal surface of side-
piece much reduced in size and number; median sternomesal tuft strongly
developed, many of the setae sharply curved cephalad and/or dorsad (figs.
Mos eet eee te . . . . IL. hendersoni; 2. brelandi
Tergal surface of sidepiece ‘not constricted: setae of mesal half of middle
portion of tergal surface of sidepiece not reduced in size or number;
median sternomesal tuft moderately developed, none or very few of the
setae sharply curved cephalad and/or dorsad (fig. 8) . . . 3. triseriatus
PUPAE
Trumpet light to medium golden brown in color (fig. 6). . . . 2. brelandi
Trompet medium 16 dark brown i COlOT 5 oe Ss sis cae
Hair 1-IV eer 4,5b BS ey hair 5-IV Ng yax, 1.6-2.2 hii of 3-III (fig. 3)
, ai . 1. hendersoni
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Hair 1-IV usually 2,3b (2- nae hair 5-1V soon 1.0-1.3 (1.0-2.0) length of
Sab Chie) oe! Leer ; oe . . . 3. triseriatus
LARVAE
1. Ventral brush (4-X) with 6 pairs of hairs; thorax and abdomen pigmented;
hair 1-X usually 4,5b (2-9); anal gills tapering distally, relatively short,
dorsal longer than ventral 1G as anes . . 3. triseriatus
Ventral brush with 5 pairs of hairs; thorax and ‘abdomen without pigment;
hair 1-X usually double (1-3b); anal gills sausage- ‘dain nasi nina
dorsal and ventral subequal in length . ; ae
2(1). Hairs 4b,4c-X usually double (2,3b) (fig. 4). . . . . . . . 1. hendersoni
Hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (2-5) (fig.7) . . . . . . . . . . 2. brelandi
1. Aedes (Protomacleaya) hendersoni Cockerell
Figs. 1-4
1918. Aedes triseriatus var. hendersoni Cockerell, 1918:199-200. TYPE: Lectotype female,
Box Elder Creek, 19 mi W Douglas, Wyoming, United States of America, 25 Aug 1917,
E. Schwabe and J. Henderson [USNM; selection of Stone and Knight, 1956:218]. Re-
duced to synonymy with triseriatus by Dyar (1919:39); resurrected to specific rank
by Breland (1960:601).
Aedes (Finlaya) hendersoni of Breland (1960:600-606); Stone (1961:40).
Aedes hendersoni of Hedeen (1963:349-350); Nielsen, Arnell and Linam (1967:72-74); Nielsen,
Linam, Arnell and Zavortink (1968:361-362); Truman and Craig (1968:1020-1025); Harmston
(1969:490-491); Loor and DeFoliart (1970:60,64). ,
Aedes (Finlaya) triseriatus in part of Dyar (1928:222); Edwards (1932:155); Matheson (1944:
187-188); Knight and Marks (1952:542,572); Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:255-257); Stone,
Knight and Starcke (1959:172); Stone (1961:41).
Aedes triseriatus in part of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:762-766); Dyar (1919:39); Rozeboom
(1942:34); Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:37-39); Breland (1949:93-100).
For additional references see Carpenter (1970:53-54).
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 3.87 mm. Proboscis: 2.35 mm. Forefemur: 2.23 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.1 mm. Head: Decumbent scales of dorsal surface light. Thorax:
Most mesoscutal bristles lightly to moderately pigmented. Acrostichal bristles us-
ually restricted to anterior promontory; anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral pre-
scutal and posterior fossal bristles relatively numerous and conspicuous. Light
mesoscutal scales predominantly silver-white in western populations, frequently
more dingy in eastern populations. Narrow interrupted or complete acrostichal
and posterior outer dorsocentral light scale lines sometimes developed in western
populations; lateral prescutellar light scale line present; light scaling of fossa ex-
tensive, usually extending mesad of anterior dorsocentral bristles; light scales some-
times in anterior transverse band on mesoscutum in western populations. Mid-
lobe of scutellum with light scales. Pleural scale patches silver-white. Psp scales
absent or very few. Legs: Forecoxal scales usually all light. Posterior or ventral
surface of forefemur and midfemur with light scales restricted to basal 0.6-0.8
or extending to apex in a narrowed streak. Knee spot absent to moderate on
foreleg, small to moderate on midleg, moderate to large on hindleg. Tibiae and
Zavortink: New World Aedes 21
tarsi very frequently marked with pale scales on at least posterior surface. Claws
of foreleg and midleg rather abruptly and sharply curved, the tooth long. Wing:
Costa usually with small basal light patch. Haltere: Varying from entirely light
scaled to predominantly dark scaled. Abdomen: Tergites H-VII with large baso-
lateral white to silver-white patch that is usually rounded mesally in eastern pop-
ulations, usually cuneate mesally and sometimes joining mate in western populations.
MALE (fig. 2). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head: Pal-
pus with numerous long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Meso-
scutal bristles lighter than in female. Light scaling of mesoscutum frequently more
extensive than in female, rarely all scutal scales light. Psp scale patch usually
absent. Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with an acute basal external tooth.
Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) with light scales.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 3). Sidepiece: Tergal sclerotization conspicuously broad-
ened distally, so that tergal surface appears constricted at level of claspette fila-
ment; basal tergomesal area usually conspicuously swollen and with numerous
elongate setae in a more or less oval to circular patch, the conspicuousness of
these setae enhanced by the reduction in size and number of the setae on the
mesal half of middle portion of tergal surface; median sternomesal sclerite strongly
developed, triangular, projecting far into mesal membrane; median sternomesal
tuft strongly developed, consisting of very numerous setae, many of which are
sharply curved cephalad and/or dorsad. Claspette: Filament angulate. Phallosome:
Aedeagus about 2.0-2.1 (1.8-2.2) times longer than greatest width.
PUPA (fig. 3). Abdomen: about 3.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.56 mm. Paddle: 0.90
mm. Trumpet: Medium to dark brown in color. Abdomen: Hair 1-II usually 4-6b
(3-14); hair 1-IIJ usually 4-6b (2-10); hair 1-IV usually 4,5b (2-8); hair 1-V_ us-
ually 3-5b (2-6). Hair 2-III usually mesad of 1-H. Hair 4-II usually laterad of
5-II. Hair 5-IV usually 1.6-2.2 length of 3-IIl.
LARVA (fig. 4). Head: 0.84 mm. Siphon: 0.85 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.26 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually single (1-3b). Hair 6-C usually 3,4b (3-5). Hair 8-C usu-
ally double (single or double). Thorax: Pigment absent, living larva white in color.
Alveolar plate of hairs 1-3-P usually absent. Abdomen: Hair 4-III,[V usually dou-
ble or bifid (1-3b or 3f). Siphon: Index usually 2.7-3.3 (2.5-3.5). Acus detached
and usually removed from base of siphon. Pecten teeth relatively short, usually
moderately pigmented; 18-26 (15-30) in number. Hair 1-S usually 2,3b (2-4). Anal
Segment: Saddle small to moderate in size, extending about 0.40-0.60 down lat-
eral surface of segment. Hair 1-X located near caudolateral angle of saddle or
less frequently along posterior margin of saddle near its caudolateral angle, its
alveolus usually at edge of saddle or in unsclerotized notch; usually double (1-
3b). Ventral brush with 5 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X usually double (2,3b).
Gills sausage-shaped; dorsal and ventral subequal in development and long to very
long, usually 3.0-4.0 (2.4-4.4) length of saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. I am in full agreement with Breland (1960), who restored
hendersoni to full specific rank. This species is well differentiated from triseriatus
in the adult and larval stages and male genitalia and can be easily separated from
that species as follows: in the adult by (1) the numerous and well developed an-
terior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles, (2) the
more extensive light scaling of the fossal area, the light scales almost always ex-
tending mesad of the anterior dorsocentral bristles, (3) the claws of the fore-
leg and midleg, which are abruptly and sharply curved and have a long submed-
ian tooth in the female, and which have an external tooth at the base of the
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
larger claw in the male, (4) the ornamentation of the wing, which has a small
but conspicuous patch of white scales at the base of the costa in the female
and the remigium (base of vein R) entirely or partially light scaled in the male,
and (5) the more numerous long bristles on the palpus of the male; in the male
genitalia most conspicuously by (1) the constricted tergal surface of the side-
piece, (2) the more numerous elongate setae of the basal tergomesal area of the
sidepiece and their arrangement in a more or less oval to circular patch, (3) the
reduction in size and number of the setae on the mesal half of the middle por-
tion of the tergal surface of the sidepiece, (4) the larger, triangular sternomesal
sclerite, (5) the strongly developed sternomesal tuft with many of the setae strong-
ly curved cephalad or dorsad, and (6) the more angular claspette filament; and
in the larva by (1) the absence of pigment in the thorax and abdomen, (2) the
acus, which is detached and removed from the base of the siphon, (3) the shorter
and usually more lightly pigmented pecten teeth, (4) the usually double (1-3b)
hair 1-X, (5) the ventral brush which has 5 pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X usually
double (2,3b), and (6) the 4 subequally developed, long to very long sausage-
shaped anal gills. The pupae of hendersoni and triseriatus are not as reliably sep-
arated as the other stages of these species, but the pupa of hendersoni is usually
distinguished from that of triseriatus by (1) the more numerous branches in hair
1-IV, and (2) the longer 5-IV.
Aedes hendersoni is most closely related to brelandi, a species from the Chisos
Mountains of southwestern Texas, and is separated from it by relatively few char-
acters in each stage, as follows: in the adult by (1) the usual absence of acros-
tichal bristles on the disc of the mesoscutum, (2) the lighter color of the meso-
scutal bristles, (3) the more silver-white or dingy-white color of the light scales
on the thorax, and (4) the reduced number or even absence of postspiracular
scales; in the pupa by the darker trumpet; and in the larva by the more weakly
developed ventral brush in which hairs 4b,4c-X are usually double (2,3b). The
male genitalia of hendersoni and brelandi are apparently indistinguishable.
Adults of hendersoni from areas west of the range of triseriatus are generally
more extensively light scaled than those from within the range of that species.
Many from the west have light scales in a transverse band across the anterior
portion of the mesoscutum and in narrow acrostichal and outer posterior dorso-
central lines, and most from this area have. the basolateral light patches of the
abdominal tergites enlarged and distinctly cuneate. The basis for the east-west
variation has not been determined.
Since hendersoni is widespread in temperate North America and its larva and
male genitalia are among the most derived in this subgenus, it is undoubtedly
one of the most recent species of Protomacleaya.
BIONOMICS. The immature stages of hendersoni normally occur in treeholes;
according to Truman and Craig (1968:1021) they are found only in those tree-
holes with water of high organic content. The Cornell University collection con-
tains adults with the label “‘bred from pitcher plant” [Sarracenia purpurea Lin-
naeus]. Adults of both sexes of hendersoni have been taken at lights and resting
in buildings and females have been collected biting humans and visiting Ceanothus
flowers.
The immatures of hendersoni are frequently associated with 2 other species of
Protomacleaya, triseriatus and zoosophus, and sometimes with Ae. (O.) epactius and
Ae. (O.) sierrensis (Ludlow, 1905). It would be interesting to investigate the ecolog-
ical distinctions that permit the continued coexistence of these species of Proto-
\
Zavortink: New World Aedes 23
macleaya. This is particularly true in the case of hendersoni and triseriatus, fairly
closely related species that are geographically sympatric over a very broad area.
Either these species typically inhabit different types of forest, their immatures
characteristically occur in different sorts of treeholes, the larvae of each species
are competitively superior to those of the other in some particular kind of tree-
hole, or the larvae occupy different ecological niches within the same treehole.
The larva of hendersoni is neotenic, that is, it retains in the fourth instar char-
acteristics that are found in only the younger instars of less differentiated species
of the subgenus, such as the reduced extent of sclerotization and reduced ventral
brush. Since neoteny has obviously played a role in the differentiation of the
larvae of another pair of closely related arboricolous species from the eastern
United States, Orthopodomyia alba Baker, 1936 and O. signifera (Coquillett, 1896)
(Zavortink, 1968:50-51), it seems certain that this phenomenon bears upon the
question of competition between the members of these species pairs. The morph-
ology, physiology or behavior of these neotenic larvae must in some way adapt
them to a different type of treehole, make them competitively superior to their
less differentiated associates under some conditions, or change what they do in
a treehole. To postulate that competition between larvae of different species can
be reduced by neoteny forces one to question the extent of competition between
the different larval instars of a single species and the effect this might have on
the population structure of that species.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes hendersoni is the most widespread treehole-
breeding mosquito in North America. I have seen specimens from all of the United
States of America (excluding Alaska and Hawaii) except Arizona, California, Flor-
ida, Nevada, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.
The species has been reported from Wisconsin by Loor and DeFoliart (1970:60-
64), undoubtedly occurs in North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington,
and very probably occurs in northern Florida, which leaves only Arizona, Cali-
fornia and Nevada outside its range. I have seen specimens from the Canadian Prov-
ince of British Columbia and the species undoubtedly occurs throughout south-
ern Canada. It may also occur in northeastern Mexico. Material examined: 710
specimens; 169 males, 312 females, 174 larvae, 55 pupae; 23 individual rearings
(20 larval, 3 incomplete).
CANADA. British Columbia: Sidar, Kootenay Lake, 1 Aug 1968, L.T. Nielsen (N-25-68),
5 M, 1M gen, 2 F [UTAH].
UNITED STATES. Alabama: Wilson Dam, Colbert Co., July 1954, R.X. Schick, 1 L [UCLA].
Arkansas: Brinkley, 18 May 1923, H.G. Dyar, 1 F [USNM]. Camp Pike, 17 May 1918, R.W.
Gies, 1 F [USNM]. Scott, 1-10 June 1909, J.K. Thibault, 1 F [USNM]. Stone Co., 5 Aug
1915, 1 F [USNM]. Colorado: Aurora, 6 Sept 1944, L.E. Perry, 1 F [UTAH]. Boulder, 8
km NE, 8 July-15 Aug 1958, J.R. Hilliard, 3 M, 3 M gen, 8 F, 6 L [USNM]. Greeley, 4 July 1962,
F.C. Harmston, 1 M [UTAH]. Kuner, 5 June 1959, F.C. Harmston, 17 M, 2 M gen, 12 F
[CDC], 8 M, 14 F [USNM]. Platteville, 1 June 1962, F.C. Harmston, 8 M, 4 M gen, 2 F
[UTAH]. Pueblo, 5 Sept 1944, L.E. Perry, 1 F [UTAH]. Vineland, 30 May 1967, M. Manson,
5 M, 1 F [UTAH]. Connecticut: Redding, 4 July 1928-July 1930, A.L. Melander, 3 F [USNM].
Delaware: Newark, 6 May 1936, D. MacCreary, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. District of Columbia:
Site not specified, 22 June 1906-25 June 1915, F. Knab, 2 F [USNM]; 9 May 1918, H.G.
Dyar, 1 M [USNM]; 14 May 1918, H. Morrison, 1 F [USNM]; 26 Sept 1921, A.N. Caudell,
1 F [USNM]; 23 May 1924, R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. Georgia: Atlanta, Fort McPherson,
1943, S.J. Carpenter, 1 M [UTAH]. Atlanta, 2 June 1948, H.D. Pratt, 2 F [CDC], 1 F [UTAH];
16 Sept 1951, G. Heid, 1 F [UCLA]; 25 Mar 1953, W.D. Sudia and R.H. Gogel, 4 M, 1 M
gen [CDC]. Chamblee, Apr 1951, H.D. Pratt, 1 L [CDC]. College Park, 28 Apr 1948, L.T.
Foote, 1 M, 1 M gen [CDC]. Worth Co., 31 Mar 1951, J.K. Wall, 1 L [CDC]. Idaho: Nampa,
24 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
27 June 1945, F.C. Harmston, 1 F [UTAH]. Jilinois: Glencoe, July 1923, G.W. Edwards, 1 F
[USNM]. Oakwood, Camp Drake, 28 July 1941, G.T. Riegel, 1 F [UTAH]. White Heath, 30
June 1938, Dirks, 1 M gen [CU]. Indiana: Lafayette, July 1928, 1 M [USNM]. Jowa: Ames, 21
July 1919, F.C. Bishopp, 1 F [USNM]. Kansas: Manhattan, 10 Oct 1934, C.W. Sabrosky, 1 F
[USNM]. Kentucky: Corbin, 24 Aug 1904, H.S. Barber, 3 F [USNM]. Hickman, J.A. Pearson, 1
F [USNM]. Louisiana: Baton Rouge, 22 Apr-24 May 1903, 3 F [USNM]. Maine: Kittery Point,
R. Thaxter, 1 F [USNM]. Maryland: Baltimore, 30 July 1919, 1 F [UCLA]. Hyattsville, 14
Aug 1907, 1 F [USNM]. Plummer’s Island, July 1907-Mar 1908, R.P. Currie, 2 F [USNM];
July 1924, R.C. Shannon, 2 F [USNM]; 7 Sept, 1 F [USNM]. River View, Aug 1905, T.
Pergande, 3 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [USNM]. Silver Spring, 20 July 1940, F.C. Bishopp, 1 M [USNM].
Takoma Park, 1 F [USNM]. Massachusetts: Framingham, 16 Sept 1937, C.A. Frost, 1 F [USNM].
West Springfield, 26 July-13 Sept 1903, F. Knab, 2 F [USNM]. Michigan: East Lansing, 21
June 1942, C. Sabrosky, 1 M [USNM]. Minnesota: Detroit Lakes, 8,9 Sept 1940, W.A. Hoffman, 1
F [USNM]. Mississippi: Agricultural College, 4 May-12 July 1905, G.W. Herrick, 2 F [USNM].
Belzoni, 4 Aug, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Missouri: Atherton, 12 June-July 1915, C.F. Adams, 1
M, 1 F [USNM]. Gumbo, 4 July 1941, W.M. Gordon, 1 F [CU]. Henson, 14 June 1918, 1 F
[USNM]. Jefferson Bks’, 24 May 1927, E.C. Bingham, 1 F [USNM]. Joplin, 7 July 1942, A.B.
Gurney, 1 F [USNM]. Kansas City, July 1951, 2 F [CDC]. Kirkwood, 13 June 1952, F.C.
Harmston, 2 M [UTAH]. Neosho, Camp Crowder, 26,28 June 1942, A.B. Gurney, 1 M, 1 F
[USNM]. St. Louis Co., 4 June-17 July 1940, W.M. Gordon, 1 M, 1 M gen, 2 F [CU]. Webster
Groves, Satterthwait, 1 F [USNM]. Montana: Drummond (3.2 km S), 16 Aug 1967, L.T. Nielsen,
J.H. Linam and J.H. Arnell (N-37-67), 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [UTAH]. Forsyth, 16 Aug 1964,
L.T. Nielsen and J.H. Linam (N-34-64), 7 M, 4 F, 3 P, 3 L [UTAH]. Glendive, 18 June 1922,
H.G. Dyar, 2 F [USNM]. Hall (9.7 km S), 16 Aug 1967, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Linam and J.H.
Arnell (N-36-67), 4 F [UTAH]. Hamilton, 5 Aug 1965, J.H. Arnell (HA-18-65), 2 M, 4 F, 3 P, 3
L; same data (HA-19-65), 8 F [UTAH]. Jordon, 16 Aug 1964, L.T. Nielsen and J.H. Linam
(N-32-64), 1 F, 2 L [UTAH]. Landusky (32 km S), James Kipp State Park, 15 Aug 1964, L.T.
Nielsen and J.H. Linam (N-30-64), 11 M, 1 M gen, 38 F [UTAH]. Lolo, 5 Aug 1965, J.H.
Arnell (HA-20-65), 7 L [UTAH]. Miles City, 16 Aug 1964, L.T. Nielsen and J.H. Linam (N-33-
64), 3 F, 3 P [UTAH]. Missoula, 6 July 1917, H.G. Dyar, 1 F [USNM]. Mosby, 16 Aug 1964,
L.T. Nielsen and J.H. Linam (N-31-64), 3 M, 5 F, 20 L [UTAH]. Silver Star, 15 Aug 1967, L.T.
Nielsen, J.H. Linam and J.H. Arnell (N-34-67), 1 M, 4 F [UTAH]. Nebraska: Albion, 10 Aug
1963, 8 L [UTAH]. Niobrara, 24 Aug 1943, W.C. Reeves and P. Galindo, 1 F [USNM]. Norfolk,
5 Aug 1943, W.C. Reeves and P. Galindo, 2 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. New Hampshire: Center
Harbor, 24 June, H.G. Dyar, 1 F [USNM]. Durham, 8 Aug, H.G. Dyar, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM].
White Mountains, Morrison, 1 F [USNM]. New Jersey: Ridgewood, 28 June 1911, M.D. Leonard,
1 F [CU]. Union Co., 1938, 1 F [UTAH]. New Mexico: Puerto de Luna, 17 Mar 1968, L.T.
Nielsen, J.H. Linam and J.H. Arnell (HA-28-68), 4 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [UTAH]. New York:
Cayuta Lake, June 1943, R. Matheson, 1 M, 1 M gen, 5 F [CU]. Fort Niagara, 27 Sept 1944,
1 F [CDC]. Franklin Co., Goldsmith, Aug 1955, J.N. Belkin, 1 F [UCLA]. Honeoye Falls, 7
Aug 1915, M.D. Leonard, 1 F [USNM]. Ithaca, Aug 1901, 1 F [CU]; 6 July 1930-4 May 1942, 6
M, 4M gen, 12 F, 3 L [CU] ; 19 Sept 1941-Apr 1942, J.N. Belkin, 1 M, 1 M gen, 2 F,3 P [UCLA].
Lake Mahopac, 13 July 1908, 1 F [CU]. McLean Bog, Aug 1942, H.T. Dalmat, 1 F [CU].
McLean Reservoir, The Shack, 7 July 1924, 1 F [CU]. Rome, 8 Oct 1944, 1 F [CDC]. Saranac,
30 Aug 1955, J.N. Belkin, 1 F [UCLA]. Suffolk Co., July-Aug 1928, 1 F [CU]. North Carolina:
Charlotte, 30 May 1916, H.P. Barret, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]. Henderson Co., 7 Oct 1901, J.L. Coker,
Jr., 1 F [USNM]. Lumberton, 13 May 1920, H.P. Barret, 1 F [USNM]. Old Fort, 28 Sept 1933,
CCC Survey, 9 F [USNM]. Ohio: Ravenna, 8 June 1970, M.J. Zavortink (UCLA 571), 7 lpM
(571-24,29,32,33,35,38,40), 6 IlpF (571-21,26,28,30,34,37), 3 Ip (571-25,36,43), 2 M gen, 1 F, 1
P, 5 L [UCLA]. Oklahoma: Flint, 19 June 1937, Standish-Kaiser, 1 F [CU]. Gore, 20 July
1937, Standish-Kaiser, 1 F [CU]. Page, 23 June 1937, Standish-Kaiser, 1 F [CU]. Wister, 2
July 1904, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Woodward (9.7 km E), Boiling Springs State Park, 1 Sept
1968, L.T. Nielsen (N-32-68), 7 M, 1 M gen, 8 F, 9 P, 50 L [UTAH]. Oregon: Pendleton (3.2
km E), 18 Aug 1967, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (N-41-67), 1 M, 1 M gen [UTAH].
Zavortink: New World Aedes 25
Pennsylvania: Allentown, 22 July 1945, R.C. Barnes, 1 F [CDC]. Philadelphia, University of
Pennsylvania, 28 July 1921, 1 F [USNM]. South Carolina: Richland Co., 10 Oct 1944, 1 F
[CDC]. South Dakota: Belle Fourche, 14 July 1966, J.H. Linam, J.H. Arnell and L.T. Nielsen, 1
F [UTAH]. Hot Springs (9.7 km SE), 14 July 1966, J.H. Arnell, JH. Linam and L.T. Nielsen
(HA-34-66), 8 M, 9 F, 4 P, 15 L [UTAH]. Tennessee: Reelfoot Lake, 1 Sept 1941, M. Gordon, 1
F [CU]. Rives, 27 July, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Texas: Austin, 1 Sept 1957, Zilker, 2 L
[UTAH]. Huntington, 24 Apr 1934, CCC Survey, 1 F [USNM]. Leon Springs, Camp Stanley, 24
May 1918, D.L. VanDine, 1 F [USNM]. Matagorda Co., 13 Aug 1943, 1 F [CDC]. Utah: Weber
Co., Weber Canyon, 13 May 1970, L.T. Nielsen et al. (HA-7-70), 1 lpM (7), 6 lpF (1,2,4,5,6,8), 6
M, 1 M gen, 1 F, 2 L [UTAH]. Virginia: Fairfax Co., Dead Run, 22 June 1915, R.C. Shannon, 1
F [USNM]. Falls Church, Holmes Run, 4 June-1 July 1961, W.W. Wirth, 1 M, 1 F [USNM].
Falls Church, 4 July 1913, F. Knab, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. Glencarlyn, 26 June 1910, F. Knab,
1 F [USNM]. Monterey, 20 Aug 1934, S.S. Cook, 1 F [USNM]. West Virginia: Rock Gap,
Cacapon State Park, 1-5 Sept 1955, C.W. Sabrosky, 2 F [USNM]. Wyoming: Careyhurst, Boxelder
Creek, 15 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-41-66), 5 M, 1 M gen, 4 F,4 L
[UTAH] . Casper, 15 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-42-66), 1 M, 11 F
[UTAH]. Devils Tower, 13 July 1966, J.H. Arnell (HA-31-66), 6 F [UTAH]. Lander, 12 July
1966, J.H. Arnell (HA-25-66), 1 M, 2 F [UTAH]. Lingle (3.2 km W), 15 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen,
J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-38-66), 5 M, 7 F [UTAH]. Newcastle (47 km S), 14 July 1966,
L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Linam and J.H. Arnell (HA-35-66), 5 M, 1 M gen, 4 F, 2 P, 6 L [UTAH].
Niobrara Co., Old Woman Creek at Hwy. 85, 14 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H.
Linam (HA-36-66), 2 M, 2 M gen, 3 F, 4 P, 6 L [UTAH]. Orin, 30 July 1961, L.T. Nielsen, 1
F [UTAH]. Orin Junction, 15 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-40-66),
1 M [UTAH]. Riverton, 12 July 1966, L.T. Nielsen, JH. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-26-66),
4 M, 1 F; same data (HA-27-66), 4 M, 4 F, 6 L [UTAH]. State Unknown: Wilsor, 7 July 1931,
1 F [CU].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. 1 M gen (550310-21) [UCLA].
2. Aedes (Protomacleaya) brelandi Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 1,2,5-7
TYPES: Holotype male with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia (UCLA 611-11),
Chisos Mountains, Big Bend National Park, Brewster Co., Texas, United States of America, ele-
vation above 1770 m, larva from rothole in living evergreen oak tree, 1 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink
[USNM]. Allotype female with associated larval and pupal skins (UCLA 611-15), same data as
holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 2 IpM (611-12,13), 2 IpF (611-14,18), 1 lp (611-17), 1 M gen,
1 L, same data as holotype (UCLA 611); 5 IpF (609-10-13,80), 2 pM (609-100,102), 5 pF
(609-101,103-105,108), 1 P, 4 L, same data as holotype (UCLA 609); 2 IpF (610-10,11), same
data as holotype (UCLA 610); 1 pM (612-102), 2 F, 2 P, 1 L, same data as holotype (UCLA
612); 4 IpM (613-15,20,22,27), 15 lpF (613-10-12,16-18,23-26,28-32), 2 lp (613-19,21), 4 pM
(613-100,102-104), 50 M, 4 M gen, 26 F, 134 P, 20 L, same data as holotype (UCLA 613);
3 IpF (614-10-12), same data as holotype (UCLA 614); 23 L, same data as holotype except
collected on 31 Aug 1969 by T.J. Zavortink and J.A. Bergland (UCLA 602); 2 IpM (603-29,
30), 3 IpF (603-32,36,90), 3 L, same data as holotype except collected on 31 Aug 1969 by
T.J. Zavortink and J.A. Bergland (UCLA 603); 1 L, same data as holotype except collected
on 31 Aug 1969 by T.J. Zavortink and J.A. Bergland (UCLA 604); 1 F, same data as holo-
type except collected biting human on 31 Aug 1969 by T.J. Zavortink and J.A. Bergland (UCLA
605); 1 F, same data as holotype except collected biting human on 31 Aug 1969 by T.J. Zavortink
and J.A. Bergland, and 2 IpM (606-10,11), 1 lp (602-12), 1 P, 3 L reared from eggs laid by F
(UCLA 606) [UCLA, ISET, BM]; 1 F, Chisos Basin Campground, Chisos Mountains, Big Bend Na-
tional Park, 10 Sept 1968, L.T. Nielsen (A-11-68) [UTAH]. This species is dedicated to Osmond
P. Breland in recognition of his contributions to the knowledge of the Culicidae.
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
FEMALE (figs. 2,5). Wing: 3.58 mm. Proboscis: 2.17 mm. Forefemur: 2.05
mm. Abdomen: about 3.3 mm. Head: Decumbent scales of dorsal surface light.
Thorax: Most mesoscutal bristles darkly pigmented. Acrostichal bristles frequently
in a more or less complete row; anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal
and posterior fossal bristles numerous and conspicuous. Light mesoscutal scales
usually whitish. Narrow interrupted to moderately broad complete acrostichal and
posterior outer dorsocentral light scale lines frequently developed; lateral prescu-
tellar light scale line developed; light scaling of fossa extensive, extending mesad
of anterior dorsocentral bristles; light scales usually in anterior transverse band
on mesoscutum. Scales of midlobe of scutellum light. Pleural scales white. Psp
with well developed scale patch. Legs: Forecoxal scales all light. Posterior or ven-
tral surface of forefemur and midfemur with light scales restricted to basal 0.55-
0.70. Knee spot absent to small on foreleg, small to moderate on midleg, mod-
erate on hindleg. Tibiae and tarsi entirely dark scaled or rarely marked with broken
pale streak or pale speckles on posterior surface. Claws of foreleg and midleg
rather abruptly and sharply curved, the tooth long. Wing: Costa with small basal
light patch. Haltere: Light scaled. Abdomen: Tergites II-VII with large basolateral
cream-white patch that is usually rounded mesally.
MALE (figs. 2,5). Generally as in female except for sexual characters. Head:
Palpus with numerous long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Meso-
scutal bristles frequently lightly pigmented. Light scaling of mesoscutum frequently
more extensive than in female, rarely all scutal scales light. Psp scale patch usually
present, small. Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with an acute basal ex-
ternal tooth. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) with light scales.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 6). Apparently indistinguishable from hendersoni.
PUPA (fig. 6). Abdomen: about 3.4 mm. Trumpet: 0.59 mm. Paddle: 0.91
mm. 7rumpet: Light to medium golden brown in color. Abdomen: Hair 1-II 4-
7b; hair 1-I[I-V usually 3-5b (2-6). Hair 2-III usually mesad of 1-III. Hair 4-Il
usually laterad of 5-II. Hair 5-[V usually at least 2.0 (1.9-2.7) length of 3-III.
LARVA (fig. 7). Head: 0.86 mm. Siphon: 0.78 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.25 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually double (1-3b). Hair 6-C usually 3,4b (2-6). Hair 8-C us-
ually double (single or double). Thorax: Pigment absent, living larva white in
color. Alveolar plate of hairs 1-3-P absent or poorly developed. Abdomen: Hair
4-IIT,1V usually 2-4b or 4f. Siphon: Index usually 2.5-3.2 (2.2-3.5). Acus detach-
ed and removed from base of siphon. Pecten teeth relatively short, usually mod-
erately pigmented; 18-24 (14-25) in number. Hair 1-S usually 3,4b (3-5). Anal
Segment: Saddle small to moderate in size, extending about 0.50-0.60 down lat-
eral surface of segment. Hair 1-X located along posterior margin of saddle near
its caudolateral angle or less frequently at caudolateral angle, its alveolus usually
at edge of saddle or in unsclerotized notch; usually double (1-3b). Ventral brush
with 5 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (2-5). Gills sausage-shaped; dorsal
and ventral subequal in length and long to very long, usually 2.7-4.0 (2.3-4.5)
length of saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes brelandi is most closely related to hendersoni. It dif-
fers from that species as follows: in the adult by (1) the frequent presence of
acrostichal bristles on the disc of the mesoscutum, (2) the darker color of the
mesoscutal bristles, (3) the whiter color of the light scales of the thorax, and
(4) the greater number of postspiracular scales; in the pupa by the lighter color
of the trumpet; and in the larva by the more strongly developed ventral brush,
in which hairs 4b,4c-X are usually 3,4b (2-5). The male genitalia of brelandi and
Zavortink: New World Aedes 27
hendersoni are apparently indistinguishable.
The extent of light scaling on the mesoscutum of brelandi appears to vary
directly with size of the adults; the light acrostichal and outer posterior dorso-
central scale lines, so conspicuous on robust specimens, may be completely ab-
sent on smaller individuals.
BIONOMICS. The immature stages of brelandi were recovered from rotholes
in oak trees (Quercus spp.) growing at elevations above 1770 meters in the Chisos
Mountains. They were associated with the other arboricolous species Aedes (Och-
lerotatus) muelleri, Anopheles (An.) judithae Zavortink, 1969 and Orthopodomyia
kummi Edwards, 1939. Females of brelandi were troublesome biters in the vicin-
ity of these treeholes.
Rainfall in the Chisos Mountains was less than normal during the summer of
1969 and many treeholes that typically would have contained water in that sea-
son were dry. Many brelandi and muelleri were obtained as first instar larvae by
filling dry treeholes with drinking water and removing it 2-5 hours later.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes brelandi is at present known from only the
Chisos Mountains in southwestern Texas. It was not recovered from numerous
collections made in the Davis Mountains to the northwest, but may occur to the
south at appropriate elevations in the Sierra Madre Oriental of Mexico. Such a
thesis is supported by the fact that it was collected with other treehole-breeding
species which occur farther south in the highlands of northern Mexico. Material
examined: 433 specimens; 68 males, 67 females, 102 larvae, 196 pupae; 58 in-
dividual rearings (42 larval, 12 pupal, 4 incomplete).
UNITED STATES. Texas: Chisos Mts., Big Bend National Park, Brewster Co., type series,
cited above.
3. Aedes (Protomacleaya) triseriatus (Say)
Figs. 1,2,8,9
1823. Culex triseriatus Say, 1823:12. TYPE: Female, Pennsylvania, United States of America
[nonexistent]. A neotype must be designated for triseriatus in order to preserve the
current taxonomic interpretation of this species and insure nomenclatorial stability. This
has not been done in the present paper because reared material from Pennsylvania is
not available.
1905. Finlaya ? nigra Ludlow, 1905:387-388. TYPE: Holotype female, Rock Island Arsenal,
Illinois, United States of America, 3 Aug 1905, G.G. Craig [USNM]. Synonymy with
triseriatus by Coquillett (1906c:21). This synonymy confirmed through courtesy of
W.W. Wirth.
Aedes (Protomacleaya) triseriata of Theobald (1907:254-257).
Aedes (Finlaya) triseriatus of Dyar (1928:222, in part); Edwards (1932:155, in part); Matheson
(1944:187-188, in part); Darsie (1951:14); Knight and Marks (1952:542,572, in part); Car-
penter and LaCasse (1955:255-257, in part); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:172, in part);
Breland (1960:600-606).
Aedes triseriatus of Dyar and Knab (1906:195-196); Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:762-766,
in part); Cockerell (1918:200); Dyar (1919:39, in part); Bennett, Baker and Sellards (1939:
101-105); Davis (1940:49); Jakmauh (1940:17); Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:37-39, in part);
Breland (1949:93-100, in part); Chamberlain, Sikes, Nelson and Sudia (1954:280-283); Davis,
Hogge, Corristan and Ferrell (1966:227-230); Kissling and Chamberlain (1967:68); Truman
and Craig (1968:1020-1025); Harmston (1969:490-491); Loor and DeFoliart (1970:60-64);
Masterson, Stegmiller, Parsons, Croft and Spencer (1971:93-94,95); Messersmith (1971:7);
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Sudia, Newhouse, Calisher and Chamberlain (1971:584,590,595-596); Sudia, Newhouse and
Henderson (1971:209); Thompson, Anslow, Hanson and DeFoliart (1972:94-95).
Aedes (Gualteria) triseriatus of Dyar (1918:73,79); Vargas (1950:62); Vargas and Downs (1950:
171)
Ochlerotatus triseriatus of Coquillett (1906c:19,21).
For additional references see Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:762-763), Carpenter and LaCasse
(1955:256-257), and Carpenter (1968:83; 1970:54).
FEMALE (fig. 2). Wing: 4.10 mm. Proboscis: 2.47 mm. Forefemur: 2.44 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.0 mm. Head: Decumbent scales of dorsal surface usually all
light in typical populations, dark in Florida population. Thorax: Mesoscutal bris-
tles lightly to darkly pigmented. Acrostichal bristles usually restricted to anter-
ior promontory; anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fos-
sal bristles relatively few and predominantly inconspicuous in typical populations,
largely absent in populations from the southeastern United States. Light meso-
scutal scales silver-white in typical populations, tinged with yellow or tan in Flor-
ida population. Light acrostichal and posterior outer dorsocentral scale lines never
developed; lateral prescutellar light scale line present in typical populations, some-
times not developed in Florida population; in typical populations light scaling
of fossa usually restricted to a narrow or broad stripe along lateral and posterior
portions, but rarely extending mesad to dorsocentral area; light scaling usually
restricted to a small patch dorsocephalad of ppn or a very narrow lateral line
in Florida population; light scales rarely in complete anterior transverse band on
mesoscutum. Scales of midscutellar lobe usually all light in typical populations,
dark in Florida population. All pleural scale patches silver-white in typical popu-
lations, dorsal patches tinged with yellow or tan in Florida population. Psp scales
absent or very few. Legs: Forecoxal scales usually all light in typical populations,
partially dark in Florida population. Posterior or ventral surface of forefemur and
midfemur with light scales usually extending to apex in a broad streak in typical
populations, but with light scales usually restricted to basal 0.5-0.6 in Florida
population. Knee spot absent to small on foreleg, small to moderate on midleg,
and usually moderate on hindleg in typical populations, absent to small on fore-
leg and midleg and small on hindleg in Florida population. Tibiae and tarsi en-
tirely dark scaled or sometimes marked with pale streak on posterior or ventral
surface. Claws of foreleg and midleg usually evenly curved, the tooth usually short.
Wing: Costa usually entirely dark scaled at base, sometimes with a few light scales.
Haltere: Usually entirely or largely light scaled in typical populations, dark scaled
in Florida population. Abdomen: Tergites II-VII with basolateral white to silver-
white patch that is rounded mesally, the patch usually large in typical popula-
tions, usually small in Florida population.
MALE (fig. 2). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head:
Palpus with relatively few long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax:
Mesoscutal bristles frequently lighter than in female. Light scaling of mesoscutum
more extensive than in female, that of fossa frequently extending mesad to dorso-
central area. Psp scales absent. Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg without
basal external tooth. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) entirely dark scaled.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 8). Sidepiece: Tergal sclerotization progressively nar-
rowing distally, the tergal surface not appearing constricted; basal tergomesal area
usually only slightly swollen and with relatively few elongate setae in a narrow
strip, the conspicuousness of these setae not enhanced by a reduction in size or
number of the setae on the mesal half of middle portion of tergal surface; med-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 29
ian sternomesal sclerite moderately developed, rounded, extending only moderate-
ly far into mesal membrane; median sternomesal tuft moderately developed, con-
sisting of moderately numerous setae, none or very few of which are sharply
curved cephalad and/or dorsad. Claspette: Filament more or less evenly curved.
Phallosome: Aedeagus about 2.2-2.3 (2.1-2.4) times longer than greatest width.
PUPA (fig. 8). Abdomen: about 3.7 mm. Trumpet: 0.51 mm. Paddle: 0.84
mm. Trumpet: Medium to dark brown in color. Abdomen: Hair 1-II usually 2-5b
(1-14); hair 1-III usually 2-4b (2-6); hair 1-IV usually 2,3b (1-4); hair 1-V 2,3b
(1-3). Hair 2-III usually laterad of 1-III. Hair 4-II usually mesad of 5-II. Hair
5-IV usually 1.0-1.3 (1.0-2.0) length of 3-III.
LARVA (fig. 9). Head: 0.92 mm. Siphon: 0.81 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.31 mm.
Head: Hair 5C single. Hair 6-C usually 2,3b (1-4). Hair 8-C usually single (single
or double). Thorax: Pigment present, living larva dark in color. Alveolar plate of
hairs 1-3-P usually well developed. Abdomen: Hair 4-III,IV usually single (single,
double or bifid). Siphon: Index usually 2.4-2.8 (2.3-3.0). Acus attached or de-
tached but near base of siphon. Pecten teeth relatively long, usually darkly pig-
mented; 16-25 (13-30) in number. Hair 1-S usually double (single or double).
Anal Segment: Saddle usually moderate in size, extending 0.50-0.65 down lateral
surface of segment. Hair 1-X usually located along posterior margin of saddle
near its caudolateral angle, its alveolus usually on saddle and removed from edge
of sclerotization by 2 or 3 alveolar diameters; usually 4,5b (3-9) in typical pop-
ulations, frequently only 2,3b in populations from the southeastern United States.
Ventral brush with 6 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (2-4). Gills usually
tapering distally; dorsal usually much longer than ventral and relatively short, 0.9-
1.6 (0.5-2.0) length of saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes triseriatus can be readily separated from hendersoni and
brelandi by the following characters: in the adult by (1) the reduction in num-
ber and size or the absence of the anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal
and posterior fossal bristles, (2) the less extensive light scaling of the fossal area,
the light scales usually not extending as far mesad as the dorsocentral area, (3)
the claws of the foreleg and midleg, which are evenly curved and have a short
submedian tooth in the female, and which do not have an external tooth at the
base of the larger claw in the male, (4) the ornamentation of the wing, which
usually does not have white scales at the base of the costa in the female or on
the remigium (base of vein R) in the male, and (5) the fewer long bristles on
the palpus of the male; in the male genitalia most conspicuously by (1) the ab-
sence of a constriction in the tergal surface of the sidepiece, (2) the fewer elon-
gate setae of the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece and their arrangement
in a narrow strip, (3) the setae on the mesal half of the middle portion of the
tergal surface of the sidepiece, which are not reduced in size or number, (4) the
smaller, more rounded sternomesal sclerite, (5) the moderately developed sterno-
mesal tuft with none or but very few of the setae strongly curved cephalad or
dorsad, and (6) the more evenly curved claspette filament; and in the larva by
(1) the presence of pigment in the thorax and abdomen, (2) the acus, which is
attached or detached but close to the base of the siphon, (3) the longer and usu-
ally more darkly pigmented pecten teeth, (4) the usually 4,5b (3-9) hair 1-X of
typical populations, (5) the ventral brush, which has 6 pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X
usually 3,4b (2-4), and (6) the anal gills, which are unequal, with the dorsal longer
than the ventral, relatively short and tapered distally. The pupa of triseriatus can
usually be separated from that of hendersoni or brelandi by (1) the few branches
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
in hair 1-IV, and (2) the shorter 5-IV.
There is a striking geographic variation in chaetotaxy and coloration of the
adults of triseriatus. Females from the southern two-thirds of Florida differ from
the typical triseriatus of the northeastern United States in the absence of most
anterior mesoscutal bristles and the great reduction of light scaling on the head,
mesoscutum, scutellum, haltere, femora and abdomen. Females from northern Flor-
ida, southern Georgia and coastal areas along the Atlantic northeast to North
Carolina and along the Gulf west to Louisiana usually also lack most of the an-
terior mesoscutal bristles and usually have the light scaling of the mesoscutum
and femora slightly reduced in extent. This partially darkened form seems to in-
tergrade with typical triseriatus to the north and even with the much darkened
form to the south. I have not been able to find any constant differences be-
tween the male genitalia, pupae or larvae of these darkened forms and northern
triseriatus. It is possible that the much darkened form from southern Florida is
a species distinct from triseriatus, but this cannot be determined at this time.
A great deal of additional collecting must be done in order to determine the
geographical and ecological distribution of these darkened forms and to docu-
ment the existence and extent of zones of intergradation between them.
The mouthparts of triseriatus larvae are quite variable. The maxillae may be
oval or triangular and the mental plate may be obtuse or acute. These variations
are correlated with each other and are frequently, but not always, correlated with
dimorphism of the mouthbrushes and antennae, as follows. Larvae with filamen-
tous mouthbrushes and long antennae usually have oval maxillae and an obtuse
mental plate, while those with pectinate mouthbrushes and short antennae fre-
quently have triangular maxillae and an acute mental plate. Larvae with the first
set of characteristics predominate in the northern portion of the range of ftriser-
iatus and larvae with the second set are more common in the southeastern United
States.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of triseriatus are usually found in treeholes and
are occasionally found in artificial containers and rockholes. They are frequently
associated with the immatures of hendersoni and zoosophus and rarely with those
of Ae. (Ochlerotatus) atropalpus. Adults have been collected at lights and in build-
ings and vehicles and females have been collected biting humans and horses.
Aedes triseriatus may be very important in the natural transmission of arbo-
viruses. It is a proven vector of the LaCrosse strain of California encephalitis virus
in Ohio and Wisconsin (Masterson et al., 1971:93-94,95; Sudia, Newhouse, Calisher
and Chamberlain, 1971:595-596; Thompson et al., 1972:94-95) and under labor-
atory conditions it is an effective vector of the viruses of yellow fever (Bennett
et al., 1939:101-105), eastern equine encephalomyelitis (Davis, 1940:49; Jakmauh,
1940:17; Chamberlain et al., 1954:280-283), Venezuelan equine encephalomye-
litis (Davis et al., 1966:227-230; Kissling and Chamberlain, 1967:68; Sudia, New-
house and Henderson, 1971:209), and western equine encephalomyelitis (Chamber-
lain et al., 1954:280-283).
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 1). Aedes triseriatus is found throughout the eastern United
States, from Minnesota to Maine, south to central Texas and Florida. The species
undoubtedly occurs in southeastern Canada and northeastern Mexico. Messersmith
(1971:7) reported finding 2 males of triseriatus in southern Greenland. The exis-
tence of a breeding population of this species there should be verified by finding
the immatures. Material examined: 4286 specimens; 1163 males, 1335 females,
1085 larvae, 703 pupae; 240 individual rearings (173 larval, 56 pupal, 11 incom-
plete).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 31
GREENLAND. Narssarssuag, 15 July 1957, D.H. Messersmith, 1 M gen [USNM].
UNITED STATES. Alabama: Auburn, Chewacla State Park, 27 Apr 1953, W.L. Seal, 2 L
[USNM]. Auburn, 8 Apr 1953, W.L. Seal, 1 L [USNM]. Ozark, Camp Rucker, 24 Feb-14 Mar
1943, J.G. Franclemont, 1 F [CDC], 39 M, 2 M gen, 24 F [CU]; 6 Mar 1944, 2 L [USNM];
J.G. Franclemont, 2 L [CU]. Sheffield, 7 June-18 Aug 1942, J.N. Belkin, 2 M, 1 M gen, 5 F
[UCLA]. Tuscaloosa, 19 Aug 1915, R.H. Van Ezdorf, 1 F [USNM]. Wilson Dam, Colbert Co.,
June-16 Aug 1954, R.X. Schick, 2 M, 2 M gen, 8 F, 10 P, 74 L [UCLA]. Wilson Dam, 27
July 1941-10 June 1942, J.N. Belkin, 1 pM (140), 1 pF (98), 1 M gen, 2 F [UCLA]; 14 Apr
1932-14 Apr 1937, 16 M, 1 F [CU]. Arkansas: Fayetteville, 8 May 1933, 1 M, 1 M gen [CU].
Helena, 30 July, H.S. Barber, 3 F [USNM]. Little Rock, Boyle Park, 28 Mar 1943, J.N. Belkin,
6 lp (441-446), 1 P [UCLA]. Little Rock, 14 Mar 1940, C.J. Carpenter, 1 M, 1 F [UTAH].
Scott, 1-10 June 1909, J.K. Thibault, 5 F [USNM]; 29 May 1914, D.L. VanDine, 1 F [USNM].
Stone Co., 5 Aug 1965, 1 F [USNM]. Connecticut: Fairfield Co., Aug 1910, V. Howard, 1 F
[USNM]. Redding, 14 Sept 1936, A.L. Melander, 1 F [USNM]. Delaware: Dover, 23-25 July
1935, 2 F [USNM]; 8-13 June 1944, 1 F, 14 L [CDC]. Newark, 8 Nov 1961-25 Mar 1963,
R.W. Lake, 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [USNM]. New Castle Co., 1962, 2 M, 1 F [UTAH]. Smyrna, 27
Aug 1933, D. MacCreary, 2 F [USNM]. Summit Bridge, 13 June 1963, R.W. Lake and F.W.
Kutz, 1 L [USNM]. District of Columbia: Catholic University, 12 Nov 1902-20 Sept 1906, T.
Pergande, 1 M, 9 F [USNM]. Chain Bridge, 26 June-Sept 1905, T. Pergande, 3 F [USNM].
Eastern Branch, 25 Aug, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Site not specified, 4 Sept 1901, W.E. Hinds,
1 F [USNM]; May 1903, A. Busck, 1 F [USNM]; 15 June 1903, W.V. Warner, 1 M, 1 M gen,
1 F [USNM]; 2-11 Sept 1903, J. Kotinsky, 1 M, 2 F, 1 L [USNM]; 1 Aug 1904, T. Pergande,
5 M, 5 F [USNM]; 7 June 1908, H.O. Marsh, 1 F [USNM]. Florida: Avon Park, Aug 1943,
R.H. Arnett, Jr., 1 F [UCLA]. Gainesville, 11 Mar 1969, J.F. Reinert (69.20), 1 lpM; 17 Feb
1969 (69.21), 1 IpM; same data (69.22), 1 lpM; 21 Mar 1969 (69.23), 1 IpM; 29 Mar 1969
(69.29), 1 lpF; 19 Apr 1969 (69.35), 1 pM; 22 Apr 1969 (69.36), 1 pM; 19 June 1969 (69.40), 3
M, 4 F; 19-29 June 1969 (69.41), 6 M, 11 F; 28 June 1969 (69.44), 8 M, 2 F; 12 July 1969 (69.50),
8 M, 9 P; 30 July 1969 (69.57), 2 F, 2 P; 29 July 1969 (69.61), 3 M; 6 May 1969 (69.88), 8 M; 31
May 1969 (69.89), 12 M, 1 F; 11 Apr 1970 (70.42), 7 F, 7 P; 15 June 1970 (70.71), 11 IpF
(2-5,7-13), 3 pM (1,18,19), 5 pF (6,14-17); 17 June 1970 (70.72), 21 IpF (1-6,8-14,18,27,29-34),
4 pM (16,19,21,25), 8 pF (15,17,20,22-24,26,28), 1 F; 28 June 1970 (70.73), 2 IpM (27,41),
10 IpF (26,28-36), 15 pM (1-3,6,7,9,10,12,13,16-21), 7 pF (8,14,15,22-25), 4 M, 2 F, 6 P, 27 L;
29 Mar-28 July 1969, 43 M, 11 F [REINERT]. Indian River Co., 13 Nov 1970, G.F. O’Meara
(UCLA 578), 12 IpM (578-11,13,17-19,22,24,35 ,40,42,44,46), 26 IpF (578-10,12,15,16,20,21,
23,25-34,36-29,41,43,45,47,48), 7 pM (578-100-104,107,109), 3 pF (578-105,106,108), 1 Ip
(578-14), 13 M, 3 M gen, 6 F, 22 P, 30 L [UCLA]. Jacksonville, 14 Nov 1946, Miller, 1 F
[CDC]. Miami, 16,17 June 1934, J. Pearson, 4 F [CU]; Oct 1944, L. Stutz, 1 F [USNM];
8 Mar, 1 F [USNM]. Orlando, 30 July 1937, G.E. Quinby (FI-20), 3 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [USNM];
4 Aug 1937, G.E. Quinby (FI-27), 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]; 6 Aug 1937, G.E. Quinby (FI-28), 1 L
[CDC]; 6 Apr 1968, L.T. Nielsen, 1 F [UTAH]; 2 Mar 1969, L.T. Nielsen, 2 M, 2 F [UTAH];
(1847), 1 M, 2 F; 16 June 1937 (1877), 2 M, 2 F; 23 June 1937 (1881), 2 L; 20 Jan 1936, 1 L
[USNM]. Ormond, 24 June 1940, 1 M gen [USNM]. Vero Beach, 18 Apr 1970, J.F. Reinert
(70.48), 5 L [REINERT]. West Palm Beach, 21 Mar 1947, Kaplan and W.F. Buren, 1 M, 1 M gen,
2 F [CDC]. No locality, 2 L [CDC]; (1499), 2 F; (1742), 2 M, 1 F; (1869), 1 F; (1885G1),
1 M; (2050), 1 F; (22-7), 1 M, 2 F; H.G. Dyar and A.N. Caudell (38), 3 M, 2 F [USNM].
Georgia: Atlanta, Fort McPherson, 2 Aug 1943, 3 F [UTAH]; 21 Mar-5 Apr 1944, 4M, 6 F
[USNM]; 6 July 1945, Gould, 1 L [CDC]; 23 June 1953, 1 L [CDC]. Atlanta, NW, 1-8 May
1947, 36 M, 1 M gen, 2 F [CDC]. Atlanta, 31 July 1906, W.B. Summerall, 2 F [USNM]; 29
July 1944, R.F. Fritz, 1 L [CDC]; 15 Aug 1944, H. Knutson, 2 L [CDC]; Apr 1946-31 May
1950, H.D. Pratt, 107 M, 94 F, 55 L [CDC], 2 M [UTAH]; 2 June 1947, R.C. Barnes, 2 F
[CDC]; 4 Mar-21 Apr 1948, C.J. Phillips, 5 F [CDC], 1 M [UTAH]; 23 Mar 1948, R.H. Foote
(436), 1 lpM (436-10), 8 IpF (436-2-4,7,9,11,12,16), 2 lp (436-6,8) [CDC]; 14 Feb 1949, H.D.
Pratt and C.J. Phillips, 13 L [CDC]; 3 May 1952, G. Heid, 1 F [UCLA]; 25 Mar 1953, W.D.
Sudia and R.H. Gogel, 13 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [CDC]; 1944, 2 M, 2 F, 1 L [USNM]; Mar 1948, 60 L
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
[CDC]; 14 L [CDC]. Augusta Arsenal, Aug 1905, 1 M, 8 F [USNM]. Augusta, Camp Gordon,
26 Aug 1946, 4 L [CDC]. Billy’s Island, Okefenokee Swamp, June-7 July 1912, 1 M, 10 F [CU].
Black Rock Lake, 29 Apr 1946, 1 F [USNM]. College Park, 17 May 1948, R.H. Foote, 1 F
[CDC]. Columbus, Fort Benning, 10 Sept 1927, E.E. Hermes, 2 M, 1 F [USNM]; 3 May 1928,
E.E. Hume, 3 M, 1 F [USNM]; 15 Aug 1942, W.W. Middlekauff, 1 M gen [CU]; 1923,3M,7F
[USNM] ; 12 July 1924, 1 M [USNM]. Cornelia, 30 Mar 1948, 1 F [CDC]. Decatur Co., Spring
Creek, 14-29 July 1912, 2 F [CU]. Dublin, 13 Aug 1945, R. Dodge, 1 F [CDC]. Forsyth, 4 Mar -
1945, H. Knutson, 8 L [CDC]. Newton, Emory University, 8 Nov 1949, R.E. Bellamy, 1 M,
1 M gen [CDC]. Rabun Co., Black Rock Mountain, 20-25 May 1911, 2 F [CU]. Savannah,
10 Mar 1937, 1 M [USNM]. Union Co., Lake Trahlyta, 22 July 1945, Barrington, 2 L [CDC].
Worth Co., 31 Mar 1951, J.K. Wall, 2 L [CDC]. No locality, 22 Aug 1924, 2 F [USNM]; 5 M,
10 F [UTAH]. Illinois: Des Plaines, 30 June 1942, H.H. Ross, 1 M [UTAH]; 5 July 1942, H.H.
Ross and Mohr, 1 F [CDC]. Glencoe, July 1925, C.W. Edwards, 4 F [USNM]. Homer Park,
30 June 1927, 3 F [CU]. Indiana: Indianapolis, Fort Benjamin Harrison, 9 Aug 1923, 1 F
[USNM]. Lafayette, 13-24 July, J.M. Aldrich, 2 F [USNM]. Jowa: Ames, 17 Aug 1906, Quayle,
3 F [USNM]; 5 July-10 Sept 1919, 4 F [USNM]. Guttenburg (8.0 km N), 12 June 1967, M.
Manson, 4 L [UTAH]. Keosauqua, 5 Sept 1933, CCC Survey, 8 F [USNM]. Kansas: Franklin
Co., 30 Aug 1951, R.S. Roberts, 2 M, 1 F [UTAH]. Lawrence, May, H.T. Martin, 1 M, 1 F
[USNM]. Topeka, 21 June 1951, R.E. Beer, 2 M, 1 F [UTAH]. Kentucky: Brandenburg (6.4
km NE), 21 Aug 1941, G.E. Quinby and J.E. Rayl (Gq 465), 5 M, 3 F [USNM]. Corbin, 24
Aug 1904, H.S. Barber, 3 F [USNM]. Fort Knox (3.2 km S), 28 July 1941, G.E. Quinby
(Gq 439), 8 M [USNM]. Louisville, Cherokee Park, 9 Aug 1941, J.E. Rayl (Gq 484), 3 F
[USNM]; 22 Aug 1941, J.E. Rayl and G.E. Quinby (Gq 472), 3 F [USNM]. Louisville, 15
Aug 1935, 2 F [CU]. Louisiana: Alexandria, Camp Beauregard, 3 Apr 1943, W.W. Wirth, 1 M,
1 M gen [USNM]. Alexandria, 31 Mar 1943, W.W. Wirth, 1 F [USNM]. Baton Rouge, 15 Aug
1902-15 Aug 1903, 10 F [USNM]; 12 June 1941-5 Apr 1942, W.W. Wirth, 1 L [CDC], 1 F,4L
[USNM]. Buras, 1-8 June 1927, R.L. Turner, 1 F, 1 L [USNM]. Houma, 23-27 Apr 1931, 17M,
4M gen, 7 F [CU]. Jennings, 10 Oct 1906, A.A. Hammar, 1 F [CU]. Kilbourne, 13 May 1944-
18 Feb 1947, W.W. Wirth, 3 M [CDC], 1 F, 31 L [USNM]. Lafitte, 12 Apr 1931, 2 F [CU].
Lake Charles, USDA laboratory colony (UCLA 572), 10 IpM (572-20,22,25-30,32,34), 10 IpF
(572-21,23,24,31,33,35-39), 107 M, 57 F, 212 P, 175 L [UCLA]. Lake Charles, 14 July 1970,
H.C. Chapman (UCLA 573), 8 IpM (573-20-25,27,34), 9 IpF (573-26,28-33,35,36), 40 M, 3 M
gen, 17 F, 35 P, 10 L [UCLA]. Logansport, 23 Mar 1908, E.S. Tucker, 1 F [USNM]. Mound,
27 Apr 1915, D.L. VanDine, 4 M, 3 M gen, 2 F [USNM]; G.H. Bradley, 3 F [USNM]; 2 L
[USNM]. New Orleans, Camp Plauche, Apr-May 1944, 3 F [USNM]. Norco, 15 Oct 1944,
F.N. Young, 2 L [UCLA]. Port Jackson, 2M, 2F [USNM]. Rapides, 7 ‘Apr 1943, W.W. Wirth,
1 F [USNM]. St. Martinville, Longfellow Evangeline State Park, 8 Sept 1968, L.T. Nielsen
(N-33-68), 5 M, 3 F, 9 P, 7 L [UTAH]. Starks, 20 July 1970, H.C. Chapman (UCLA 575),
5 IpM (575-20,23,27,29,30), 6 IpF (575-21,22,24-26,28), 25 M, 1 F, 27 P, 36 L [UCLA]. No
locality, 3 M gen [USNM]. Maine: Naples, Sebago Lake State Park, J.C. Kuschke, 2 F [USNM].
Maryland: Baltimore, Patapsco State Park, 17 Oct 1965, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 286), 2 IpM
(286-30,31) [UCLA]. Baltimore, Nov 1922, W.A. Hoffman, 2 F [USNM]; 11 July 1919, 2 F
[UCLA]. Bethseda, 6 Aug 1949, K.L. Knight, 1 lpF (8.8), 1 M [UTAH]. Cabin John, 30 Aug-
5 Sept 1908, F. Knab, 2 M, 3 F [USNM]; 17 June 1928, H.G. Dyar, 1 M [USNM]. Camp Verde,
May-June 1919, R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. Edgewood, 11 Sept 1947, S.J. Carpenter, 1 F
[UTAH]. Forest Glen, 29 Aug 1966, W.W. Witth, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. Herzog’s Island, 24
June 1906, 1 M [USNM]. Plummer’s Island, 5 June-19 Aug 1903, W.V. Warner, 2 F [USNM];
Sept 1903, A. Busck, 1 F [USNM]; 30 Aug 1908-28 July 1912, F. Knab, 2 F [USNM]; 13 Aug
1914, R.C. Shannon, 1 M [USNM]; 3 May 1936, H.S. Barber, 1 L [USNM]; 27 June 1965, W.
Grimm (UCLA 283), 1 IpM (283-10), 1 M gen [UCLA]; 25 Aug, R.P. Currie, 2 F [USNM];
R.P. Currie and F. Knab, 1 Ip (282) [USNM]. River View, Aug 1905, T. Pergande, 8 M, 1 M
gen, 3 F [USNM]. Rockville, 4 July 1960, C.W. Sabrosky, 1 F [USNM]. Silver Spring, 20
July 1940, F.C. Bishopp, 2 M [USNM]. Takoma Park, 1 F [USNM]. Massachusetts: Amherst,
1 June 1943, 2 M [CDC]. Athol, 10 Sept 1932, A.L. Melander, 1 F [USNM]. Ayer, Fort
Zavortink: New World Aedes 33
Devens, 25 July 1944, 1 M [CDC]. Chicopee, 17 Aug 1903, F. Knab, 1 F [USNM]. East Lee,
26 July 1921, J.L. Webb, 1 F [USNM]. Framingham, 20 Aug 1943, 6 F [CDC]. Granby, 12 Sept
1903, F. Knab, 1 F [USNM]. Springfield, W.H. Chaplin, 2 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [USNM]. Westfield,
30 July 1903, F. Knab, 1 F [USNM]. West Springfield, 26 July-24 Sept 1903, F. Knab, 3 M,
1 M gen, 20 F, 2 P [USNM]. Michigan: East Lansing, 21 June 1942, C.W. Sabrosky, 1 M, 1 F
[USNM]. Nottawa, June 1942, C.W. Sabrosky, 2 F [USNM]. Ogemaw Co., 1,2 Aug 1959, R.R.
Dreisbach, 1 F [USNM]. Minnesota: Detroit Lakes, 8,9 Aug 1940, W.A. Hoffman, 2 F [USNM].
Minneapolis, 3 July, K. Taylor, 1 F [USNM]. Mississippi: Agricultural College, 11 May-14 July
1905, G.W. Herrick, 1 M, 2 F [USNM]. Clarksdale, 1 Aug 1904, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM].
Columbus, Columbus Army Air Field, 13 May 1943, S.J. Carpenter, 1 F [UTAH]. Corinth,
14 Aug 1904, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Gulfport, 6 Apr 1944, 4 L [USNM]. Hattiesburg,
Camp Shelby, 18 Aug 1943, 1 L [CDC]; 7 Feb-7 June 1944, 16 L [USNM]. Jackson, 8 Aug
1904, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Scott, 24 Apr 1915, M.B. Mitzmain, 1 F [USNM]. Sibley,
A. Fleming, 5 M, 2 F, 1 L [USNM]. West Point, 11 Aug 1904, H.S. Barber, 1 M, 1 F [USNM].
Missouri: Boone’s Lick, 3 May 1966, C. Childers, 1 L [USNM]. Columbia, 20 Aug 1941, W.M.
Gordon, 2 F [CU]; 18 Aug, K.C. Sullivan, 1 F [USNM]. Eagle Rock, Roaring River State Park,
5 July 1942, A.B. Gurney, 1 F [USNM]. Jefferson Bks’., 21 Oct 1926-24 May 1927, E.C.
Bingham, 2 F [USNM]. Kansas City, July 1951, 1 M [CDC]. Neosho, Camp Crowder, 19 June-
27 July 1942, A.B. Gurney, 1 M, 1 M gen, 3 F [USNM]. Oakville, 24 Sept 1941, W.M. Gordon,
1 F [CU]. St. Louis (3.2 km W), Sept-Oct 1904, A. Busck, 2 M, 5 F [USNM]. St. Louis Co.,
4 June 1940-28 June 1941, W.M. Gordon, 5 F [CU]. Sikeston, 27 Aug 1921, M.F. Boyd, 3 M,
2 F [USNM]. Webster-Groves, 15 July 1919-28 May 1920, Satterthwait, 20 M, 9 F [USNM].
New Jersey: Chester, 24 Sept, J.M. Aldrich, 1 F [USNM]. Hewitt, 18 June 1904, 1 F [CU].
Lahaway, 31 May-6 June 1903, J.T. Brakeley, 4 M, 3 F [USNM]; 8 June-2 Aug 1903, H.G.
Dyar, 4 M, 5 F, 3 P, 2 L [USNM]. Menlo Park, 26 June 1947, S.J. Carpenter, 1 F [UTAH].
New Brunswick, 29 Aug, J.M. Aldrich, 1 F [USNM]. Paterson, 7 Sept, J.M. Aldrich, 1 F [USNM].
Ridgewood, 2 July 1911, M.D. Leonard, 1 F [CU]. Stelton, 23 June 1944, 6 L [CDC]. New
York: Albany, 10 Aug 1907, 3 F [CU]. Cayuta Lake, June-July 1943, R. Matheson, 97 M,
2 M gen, 97 F, 3 L [CU]. Cranberry Lake, 24-26 June 1963, W.W. Wirth, 1 M [USNM]. Fort
Niagara, 13 July-23 Aug 1944, 9 F [CDC]. Ithaca, Buttermilk, 10 July 1928, 1 F [CU]. Ithaca,
Six Mile Creek, 6 May 1922, R.C. Shannon and West, 4 L [CU]; 7 Sept 1922, R.C. Shannon,
1 F [CU]. Ithaca, Woodson Hill, 24 June 1914, 2 F [CU]. Ithaca, 1901-1903, O.A. Johannsen,
13 M, 8 F, 3 P, 4L [USNM]; Apr-May 1942, J.N. Belkin, 1 M, 1 M gen, 5 P [UCLA]; 4 July 1969,
G. Steyskal, 3 F [USNM]; 3 Aug 1901, 1 F [CU]; 20 July 1914-7 Sept 1942, 34 M, 132 F
[CU], 1 F [UCLA], 2 L [USNM]; 4 M, 12 F, 4 L [CU]. Manhattan, 2 Sept 1909, 1 F [CU].
McLean, 27 June 1940, 1 F [CU]. New York City, 15 Pine St., 27 July 1944, C. Slemrod, 1
M [CDC]. Niagara Falls, 24 July 1944, 1 F [CDC]. North River, 6-16 Aug 1950, C.W. Sabrosky,
1 F [USNM]. Orangeburg, Camp Shanks, 23 June 1944, 1 F [CDC]. Rome, 10 Aug 1944, 1 F
[CDC]; 19 May-3 Aug 1945, 4 F [CDC]. Suffolk Co., July-Aug 1928, 7 F [CU]. Syracuse, 28
June 1932, 1 F [CU]. Tannersville, 16 Sept 1926, L.O. Howard, 1 F [USNM]. Watkins Glen,
7 July 1928, 4 F [CU]. West Point, 2 Aug 1944, 1 F [CDC]. Yaphank, July 1909, W.T. Davis,
1 F [CU]. North Carolina: Asheville, 30 May 1944, H.F. Schoof, 5 L [CDC]. Bodie Island,
23 Sept 1960, 1 F [CDC]. Chapel Hill, 1 Apr 1970, R.L. Knight (UCLA 569), 6 IpM (569-
20-25), 1 lpF (569-26) [UCLA]; same data (UCLA 570), 1 IpF (570-90) [UCLA]. Charlotte,
1916, H.P. Barret, 1 F [USNM]. Flat Rock, 4 July 1914, A.H. Jennings, 1 M, 1 F [USNM];
22 July 1914, R.H. VanEzdorf and J.A. LePrince, 1 F [USNM]. Maxton, 24 June-13 Sept
1943, A.B. Klots, 1 M, 2 F [USNM]. Old Fort, 28 Sept 1933, CCC Survey, 3 F [USNM]. New
River, May 1942, G.E. Bohart, 1 L [UCLA]. Pinnacle, Aug 1906, F. Sherman, 1 F [USNM].
Roanoke Rapids, 20 Aug 1915, T.H.D. Griffiths, 1 F [USNM]. Wilmington, 1920, H.P. Barret,
1 M [USNM]. Ohio: Columbus, 18-28 May 1943, H.W. Smith, 2 M, 2 M gen, 1 F [UCLA].
Fairfield Co., 31 July 1951, F. Mead, 1 F [CDC]; 1 F [CDC]. Ravenna, 8 June 1970, M.J.
Zavortink (UCLA 571), 3 IpM (571-20,23,31), 4 IpF (571-22,27,39,41), 1 Ip (571-42), 2 M
gen [UCLA]. Toledo, 24-30 June 1915, C. Fox, 2 F [USNM]. Wilmot, 5 July 1965, T.J.
Zavortink (UCLA 444), 1 IpM (444-10), 6 IpF (444-11-16), 35 M, 2 M gen, 19 F, 94 P, 172 L
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
[UCLA]. Oklahoma: Chickasha, 18 May 1944, 1 L [CDC]. Flint, 19 June 1937, Standish-
Kaiser, 1 M, 1 M gen [CU]. Stillwater, 21 Sept 1964-18 Apr 1965, J.F. Reinert, 4 L [REINERT].
Pennsylvania: Allentown, 22 July 1945, R.C. Barnes, 4 F [CDC]. Mt. Gretna, 4 M, 2 F [USNM].
Turtle Creek, 31 Aug 1947, 10 L [CDC]. South Carolina: Charleston, Naval Ammunition Depot,
6 July 1944, 1 L [CDC]. Columbia, 1 Aug 1906, 2 F [USNM]. Myrtle Beach, 3 July 1943
(L-24), 4 M [UTAH]; 10 July 1943-31 Mar 1944, 8 L [USNM]; 2 F [USNM]. Orangeburg Co.,
25 Feb 1944, 2 L [CDC]. Richland Co., 26 May 1944, 1 F [CDC]. Santee-Cooper Reservoir,
27 May-1 June 1945, C.W. Sabrosky, 27 M, 4 F [USNM]. Swansea, 6 Aug 1911, F. Knab, 1 F
[USNM]. Tennessee: Athens, 21,22 Aug, H.S. Barber, 1 M, 2 F [USNM]. Decherd, 18 Aug
1904, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Kingsport, 18 July-18 Aug 1934, L. Arnott, 6 M, 1 M gen, 2 F,
1 L [CU]; 18 July 1934, W. Heinrich, 12 M, 2 M gen [CU]. Knoxville, 26-30 Apr 1935, S.E.
Shields, 1 M, 9 F [USNM]. Norris, 28 May 1935, S.E. Shields, 1 M [USNM]. Reelfoot Lake,
1 Sept 1941, M. Gordon, 2 F [CU]. Texas: Austin, 17 June 1947, O.P. Breland, 2 F [CDC];
30 July 1947-15 June 1948, O.P. Wilkins, 2 L [CDC]. Bexar Co., 20 July 1942, 1 M [CDC].
Brazoria Co., 2 Sept 1943, 1 L [CDC]. Brownsville, 15 May 1940, 1 F [CU]. Cyprus Bayou,
23 Aug 1903, J.D. Mitchell, 5 F [USNM]. Denison, 22,25 June 1904, H.S. Barber, 2 F [USNM].
Eagle Lake, 8 Sept 1968, L.T. Nielsen (N-34-68), 7 M, 17 F, 9 L [UTAH]. Frio Co., 2 June
1943, 1 M, 1 F [CDC]. Harris Co., 4 Aug 1943, 1 L [CDC]. Hondo, 9 Sept 1968, L.T. Nielsen
(N-35-68), 8 M, 15 F, 2 P, 9 L [UTAH]. Huntington, 24 Apr 1934, CCC Survey, 1 F [USNM].
Luling, Palmetto State Park, 11 Jan 1948, O.P. Breland, 2 L [CDC]. McAllen, 4 Nov 1925,
R.L. Turner, 1 F [USNM]. San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, 13 Mar 1964, J.F. Reinert, 3 L
[REINERT]. San Antonio, 29,30 Apr 1942, W.C. Reeves, B. Brookman and R.B. Eads, 1 M, 1 F
[USNM]. Victoria, 28 July-18 Oct 1904, E.G. Hinds, 3 M, 7 F, 5 P, 4 L [USNM]. No locality,
1953, F.C. Harmston, 3 M, 2 F [UTAH]. Vermont: Jacksonville, Laurel Lake, 18 May 1947,
H.D. Pratt, 1 M, 7 F [CDC]. Virginia: Accotink, Fort Humphreys, 23 June 1921, 11 M, 1 M gen,
9 F [USNM]. Bluemont, 27-29 July 1904, 6 M, 3 F [USNM]. Difficult Run, 11 July 1906,
H.S. Barber and F. Knab, 1 F [USNM]. Falls Church, Holmes Run, 10 July 1960-17 Sept 1961,
W.W. Wirth, 10 M, 1 F [USNM]. Falls Church, 4 Sept 1906, A.N. Caudell, 1 F [USNM].
Glencarlyn, 10 May 1920, C.T. Green, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]. Great Falls, 3 Oct 1903-3 Sept 1909,
T. Pergande, 15 M, 24 F [USNM]; 15 June 1953, G. Steyskal, 1 F [USNM]; 22-28 June 1911,
3 M, 2 F [USNM]. Hampton, Fort Monroe, 19 July 1927, E. Slackshear, 1 F [USNM]. Lake
Drummond, 8-11 June 1905, H.S. Barber, 1 F [USNM]. Monterey, 20 Aug 1934, S.S. Cook,
1 M, 5 F [USNM]. Mt. Vernon, 15 July 1923, 1 F [USNM]. Richmond, July 1927, 1 F [CDC].
Rosslyn, 19 Sept 1902-July 1910, T. Pergande, 8 M, 11 F [USNM]; 20 Aug 1913, F. Knab, 1 F
[USNM] . Williamsburg, Camp Peary, July 1943, R.M. Bohart, 1 L [USNM]. Woodstock, 2 June
1903-12 Aug 1904, F.C. Pratt, 9 F, 8 P, 11 L [USNM]. No locality, 18 June 1903-5 Oct 1905,
T. Pergande, 4 M, 2 F [UCLA], 48 M, 78 F, 1 P [USNM], 2 F [UTAH]. Wisconsin: Darlington,
2 July 1950, R.E. Ryckman, 1 F [USNM]. State Unknown: New Smyrna, 23 July 1941, 1 M,
1 M gen [USNM].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. 5 M, 2 F [CDC]; 1 IpF, 9 M, 8 M gen, 7 F, 2 L [CU]; 15 Aug
1919, 2 F; EJ. Gerberg (UCLA 284), 1 IpM (284-11), 1 IpF (284-10), 1 M gen; 1 M gen
(550310-22) [UCLA] ; May 1905, F. Knab (224), 2 M, 1 F; Marcovitch, 1 F; 1 M, 1 F [USNM].
ZOOSOPHUS GROUP
4. Aedes (Protomacleaya) zoosophus Dyar & Knab
Figs. 10-12
1918. Aedes zoosophus Dyar and Knab, 1918:165. TYPE: Holotype female, Kerrville, Texas,
United States of America, 19 Aug 1909, F.C. Pratt [USNM]. Synonymy with fluviatilis
(Lutz, 1904) by Dyar (1921a:30); resurrected by Dyar (1928:220-221).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 35
1925. Aedes alleni Turner, 1924:84. TYPE: Lectotype male with genitalia slide, Mission, Texas,
United States of America, reared from larva found in treehole, 28 Dec 1923 [USNM;
selection of Stone and Knight, 1956:214]. Synonymy with zoosophus by Gjullin (1946:
234).
Aedes (Finlaya) zoosophus of Gjullin (1946:234); Knight and Marks (1952:538,567); Carpenter
and LaCasse (1955:259-261); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:173); Carpenter (1968:83;
1970:54).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) zoosophus of Dyar (1928:220-221).
Aedes (?Taeniorhynchus) zoosophus of Dyar (1918:74).
Aedes (?Ochlerotatus) zoosophus of Edwards (1932:138).
Aedes (Finlaya) alleni of Dyar (1928:222-223); Edwards (1932:152); Matheson (1944: 185-186).
Aedes alleni of Dyar (1924:131-132); Rozeboom (1942:30); Jenkins and Carpenter (1946:36);
Breland (1949:93-100).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) fluviatilis in part of Dyar (1921a:30; 1922b:86-87; 1925:146).
FEMALE. Wing: 3.02 mm. Proboscis: 1.92 mm. Forefemur: 1.68 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.8 mm. Head: Integument brown to black. Erect scales usually uni-
colorous, white to yellowish. Narrow curved scales usually unicolorous, silver-white.
Thorax: Integument brown to black. Acrostichal, anterior dorsocentral, humeral
and posterior fossal bristles usually absent, rarely a total of 1 or 2 present and
well developed; usually 1 well developed lateral prescutal bristle present. Meso-
scutum with background of predominantly small creamish-tan to golden-brown
scales anteriorly and dark brown or black scales posteriorly and with pattern of
predominantly larger silver-white or cream-colored scales, as follows: (1) cream-
colored scales in broad patch on median anterior promontory, (2) cream-colored
scales sometimes forming narrow broken or complete acrostichal line, (3) silver-
white scales in broad lateral prescutellar line, (4) silver-white scales usually in nar-
row to broad posterior outer dorsocentral line, and (5) cream-colored and silver
scales in broad to very broad lateral marginal line extending from anterior pro-
montory to wing root and mesad along scutal suture, the scales more distinctly
cream-colored anteriorly and more distinctly silver posteriorly. Midlobe of scu-
tellum with scales very dense, broad and flat, silver. Pon scales narrow and curved,
creamish-tan, yellowish-cream and/or cream-white. Pleural scale patches silver-white;
psp scales absent or few; ssp scales present; pst and metameron bare. Legs: Pos-
terior or ventral surface of forefemur and midfemur with light scales restricted
to basal 0.5-0.6. Knee spot absent to small on foreleg, small to moderate on mid-
leg, moderate to large on hindleg. Tibiae usually with basal light patch or ring
and sometimes with pale streak on posterior surface. Tarsal segments 1-3 or 4
of foreleg and midleg and tarsal segments 1-4 or 5 of hindleg with conspicuous
broad basal white ring. Claws of hindleg simple. Wing: Base of costa with white
scales in large patch or short line extending about 0.5 distance to crossvein h.
Base of vein R white scaled to slightly distad of level of crossvein h. Abdomen:
Tergites II-VIII usually dark scaled with basal light band that is broader laterally.
Basal sternites light scaled, distal dark scaled with broad basal light band that
may be broader laterally.
MALE. Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus us-
ually with light scales on dorsal surface of segments 2 and 3; with numerous long
bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum with greater pro-
portion of scales of anterior portion silver-white to cream-colored than in female.
Psp scales usually absent. Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with an acute
basal external tooth; claws of hindleg simple. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R)
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
light scaled to slightly beyond level of crossvein h.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 11). Sidepiece: Usually weakly to moderately pig-
mented. Basal tergomesal area moderately to conspicuously swollen; setae of basal
tergomesal area few, not arising from a differentially sclerotized plaque; median
sternomesal sclerite weakly developed; median sternomesal tuft very weakly de-
veloped, the setae not strongly curved dorsad. Claspette: Filament evenly curved.
Phallosome: Aedeagus relatively long and slender, length 2.1-2.4 greatest width.
PUPA (fig. 11). Abdomen: about 3.3 mm. Trumpet: 0.48 mm. Paddle: 0.66
mm. Hairs largely strongly developed and strongly pigmented. Cephalothorax: Hairs
4.8-C moderately to strongly developed, short; 8-C shorter and finer than 9-C.
Trumpet: Medium golden-brown to brown. Abdomen: Hair 1-I] with 2-4 mod-
erately to strongly developed short branches; 1-III usually double (1-4b); hair 1-
IV usually double (1-3b); hair 1-V single or double (1-3b). Hair 2-II] mesad or
laterad of 1-IIl. Hair 4-Il mesad of 5-II. Hair 5-IV 1.8-2.6 length of 3-III. Hair
6-I,II strongly developed, as stout as or stouter than 3-[,II. Hair 9-III-VI stout,
relatively long. Paddle: Apex rounded or subtruncate.
LARVA (fig. 12). Head: 1.05 mm. Siphon: 0.85 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.32 mm.
Head: Labrum more or less evenly rounded in dorsal aspect. Hair 1-C stout, aris-
ing on or near front edge of labrum. Hair 4-C well developed, with numerous
(10-24) long branches; closer to midline than to 6-C. Hair 5-C single or double.
Hair 6-C usually 2,3b (2-4). Hair 7-C 6-9b. Hair 15-C short to moderately long,
1-3b. Mental plate distinctly triangular, lateral teeth not conspicuously enlarged.
Antenna: Shaft smooth or with a few spicules. Thorax: Pigment absent, living
larva white in color. Alveolar plate of hairs 1-3-P usually well developed. Hairs
1,5-P branched. Abdomen: Hair 12-I usually absent. Segment VUI: Comb scales
usually 10-12 (8-12), in 1 regular or irregular row. Siphon: Index usually 2.0-
2.3 (1.7-2.5). Acus attached or detached but near base of siphon. Pecten teeth
moderately long, usually darkly pigmented; usually 19-23 (11-24). Hair 1-S usu-
ally 2,3b (1-3). Anal Segment: Saddle large, extending 0.65-0.80 down lateral
surface of segment; with a narrow lightened or transparent ventral marginal or
submarginal area. Hair 1-X located along posterior margin of saddle about mid-
way between dorsal surface and ventral edge, its alveolus on saddle and removed
from edge of sclerotization by 2-4 alveolar diameters; usually 4,5b (2-7). Ventral
brush with 7 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3b (2-4). Gills sausage-shaped;
dorsal much longer than ventral and moderately long, usually 1.5-2.5 (1.3-2.8)
length of saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes zoosophus is characterized as follows: in the adult by
(1) the creamish-tan to golden-brown background scales of the anterior half of
the mesoscutum, (2) the conspicuous white band at the base of tarsal segments
1-3 or 4 of the foreleg and midleg and 1-4 or 5 of the hindleg, and (3) the basally
banded tergites; in the male genitalia by the combination of (1) the weak to
moderate pigmentation, (2) the setae of the basal tergomesal area, which are few
and which do not arise from a differentially sclerotized plaque, (3) the weakly
developed sternomesal tuft, and (4) the relatively long, slender aedeagus, which
is 2.1-2.4 times longer than its greatest width; in the pupa by the combination
of (1) the short hairs 4,8-C, and (2) the relatively strong 6-I,J] and 9-III-VI; and
in the larva by (1) the absence of hair 12-I, and the combination of (2) the ab-
sence of pigment in the thorax and abdomen, (3) the few comb scales in | reg-
ular or irregular row, (4) the large anal saddle with a narrow ventral marginal
or submarginal lightened or transparent area, and (5) the ventral brush which has
Zavortink: New World Aedes Bi
7 pairs of hairs and 4b,4c-X usually 3b (2-4).
Aedes zoosophus differs so conspicuously from other species of Protomacleaya,
particularly in ornamentation of the adult and features of the larva, that I am
placing it into a monotypic group. Since it possesses a combination of primitive
characters, such as the undifferentiated genitalia of the male and the well developed
ventral brush and anal saddle of the larva, and derived characters, such as the
unusual ornamentation of the adult and the absence of hair 12-I in the larva,
zoosophus is probably an early segregate of Protomacleaya.
Too few specimens of research quality have been available for study to deter-
mine the existence or extent of geographical variation in zoosophus. The light
scaling of depauperate adults is reduced in extent and in depauperate males the
light scales of the palpus may be completely absent.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of zoosophus have been collected in treeholes and
artificial containers. They are frequently associated with 2 species of Protomacleaya
in the Triseriatus Group, hendersoni and triseriatus, and rarely associated with Ae.
(Ochlerotatus) epactius. Adults of both sexes are attracted to lights and females
are known to bite humans. |
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes zoosophus is definitely known from only the
southcentral United States and northeastern Mexico. Material examined: 166 spec-
imens; 40 males, 46 females, 64 larvae, 16 pupae; 12 individual larval rearings.
MEXICO. Tamaulipas: Ciudad Victoria, 30 Apr 1962, 1 L [USNM].
UNITED STATES. Arkansas: Fort Smith, Camp Chaffee, May 1964, Montague, 1 F [USNM].
Pine Bluff, 15 May 1964, Castillion, 1 F [USNM]. Kansas: Salina, T.A. Olson, 1 M gen [USNM].
Oklahoma: Cheyenne, 7 June 1937, Standish-Kaiser, 1 M, 1 M gen [CU]. Muse, 25 June 1937,
Standish-Kaiser, 1 F [CU]. Woodward (9.7 km E), Boiling Springs State Park, 1 Sept 1968,
L.T. Nielsen (N-32-68), 1 M, 1 F, 1 L [UTAH]. Texas: Austin, Zilkes Park, 23 Feb-10 Mar
1956, Steen, 2 M, 2 M gen, 6 L [UCLA]. Austin, 1941, C.P. Coogle, 1 F [USNM]. Brownsville,
29 Feb 1924, R.L. Turner, 1 F [USNM]; 25 Mar 1940, F.W. Fiske, Jr., 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F
[USNM] ; 29,29 Sept 1942, E.S. Ross, 1 M, 2 F, 3 L [USNM]; 12 Sept 1944, C.R. Joyce, 23 L
[USNM]; 7 May 1963, J.F. Reinert, 2 L [REINERT]; 11-25 Mar 1940, 2 F [USNM]; 15 Apr-
15 May 1940, 4 F, 4 L [CU]. Corpus Christi, Naval Air Station, 3 June 1942, W.M. Gordon, 1 M,
1 M gen [CU]. Fort Worth, 31 May-8 June 1944, J.E. Porter, 2 M, 2 F [USNM]. Frio Co., 2
June 1943, 3 M, 3 F [USNM]. Hondo, 9 Sept 1968, L.T. Nielsen (N-35-68), 4 P, 4L [UTAH].
Mission, Dec 1923-Mar 1924, R.L. Turner, 10 M, 8 F, 5 L [USNM]. Rio Grande Valley, Oct
1925, R.L. Turner, 1 F [USNM]; 1 M [USNM]. San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, 29 July
1964, J.F. Reinert, 2 L [REINERT]. San Antonio, 29 May 1941, 1 M [USNM]. San Benito,
6 June 1942, R.B. Eads, B. Brookman and W.C. Reeves, 3 M, 2 F [USNM]. Sheffield, 7 Mar
1949, A.G. Flury, 3 M, 3 M gen, 5 F [UCLA]; 30 May 1949, A.G. Flury, 3 M, 4 F [USNM]:
3 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink and J.A. Bergland (UCLA 619), 4 IpM (619-10,12,13,16), 5 IpF
(619-11,14,15,17,18), 1 M gen, 1 L; same data (UCLA 632), 1 lpF (632-10); same data (UCLA
633), 2 IpM (633-90,91), 1 M gen [UCLA].
Additional Record From the Literature
UNITED STATES. Louisiana: (see Carpenter, 1968:83).
KOMPI GROUP
FEMALES. Head: Integument brown to black. Erect scales usually bicolorous,
white to amber mesally, dark brown to black laterally. Narrow curved scales us-
ually bicolorous, white mesally, white and dark brown to black laterally. Thorax:
Integument brown to black. Acrostichal bristles numerous, moderately to strongly
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
developed; anterior dorsocentral bristles numerous and well developed, reduced
in number and size, or absent from disc; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior
fossal bristles few to numerous, weakly to strongly developed. Mesoscutum with
background of mostly small dark brown to black scales and with pattern of mostly
larger white to silver-white scales, as follows: (1) narrow to broad complete acros-
tichal line present or absent, (2) lateral prescutellar line usually present, (3) com-
plete posterior outer dorsocentral line usually present, (4) narrow to broad lat-
eral marginal line extending from anterior promontory to wing root developed,
and (5) posterior fossal line joining lateral marginal and posterior outer dorso-
central lines usually present. Midlobe of scutellum with scales sparse, narrow and
curved, white to silver-white or some dark. Ppn scales varied in shape, usually
white to silver-white; psp scales usually present, few to numerous; ssp scales pres-
ent; pst and metameron bare or scaled. Legs: Tarsal segment 1 of foreleg and
midleg marked with light scales, the marking varying from a relatively incon-
spicuous streak on basal portion of posterior and ventral or dorsal surfaces to
a conspicuous white band covering nearly entire segment; segment 2 of foreleg
and midleg and segment 1 of hindleg sometimes marked with white at base. Claws
of hindleg simple. Wing: Base of costa and vein R usually without light scales.
Abdomen: Tergites II-VIII dark scaled with basolateral light patch. Basal sternites
frequently light scaled, distal dark scaled with basolateral light patch or light basal
band which is broader laterally.
MALES. Essentially as in females except for sexual characters and usually
mesoscutal ornamentation. Head: Palpus entirely dark scaled; with few to num-
erous long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum more ex-
tensively light scaled than in females, entirely white or silver-white in most species.
Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with an acute basal external tooth; claws
of hindleg simple. Wing: Remigium (base Of vein R) dark scaled or entirely or
partially light scaled to at least level of crossvein h. Abdomen: Tergites some-
times with conspicuous basal light band.
MALE GENITALIA. Sidepiece: Usually moderately to strongly lemented: Basal
tergomesal area slightly to moderately swollen; setae of basal tergomesal area few
to moderately numerous, not arising from a differentially sclerotized plaque; med-
ian sternomesal sclerite weakly to moderately developed; median sternomesal tuft
absent to moderately developed, the setae not strongly curved dorsad. Claspette:
Filament evenly curved. Phallosome: Aedeagus relatively short and broad, length
1.7-2.0 maximum width.
PUPAE. Hairs strong and deeply pigmented. Cephalothorax: Hairs 4,8-C very
strongly developed, long; 8-C much longer and stronger than 9-C. Trumpet: Light
golden brown to brown. Abdomen: Branches of hair 1-II moderately to strongly
developed, long. Hair 6-I,II usually strongly to very strongly developed, usually
as stout as 3-I,II. Hair 9-III-VI fine, short to relatively long. Paddle: Apex usually
pointed or produced.
LARVAE. Head: Labrum more or less evenly rounded in dorsal aspect. Hair
1-C stout, arising on or near front edge of labrum. Hair 4-C poorly developed,
with few (2-8) short branches; much closer to 6-C than to midline. Hair 5-C 1-4b.
Hair 6-C 1-7b. Hair 7-C 2-6b. Hair 15-C short to moderately long, 1-3b. Mental
plate distinctly triangular, lateral teeth not conspicuously enlarged. Antenna: Shaft
with numerous small spicules. Thorax: Pigment present. Hairs 1,5-P branched. Ab-
domen: Hair 12-I present. Segment VIII: Comb scales usually 24-55 (16-65), in
a patch. Siphon: Index 2.5-5.0. Acus usually attached, sometimes included in ba-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 39
sal sclerotization of siphon and not distinct. Pecten teeth 15-31. Hair 1-S 2-4b.
Anal Segment: Saddle moderate to large in size, extending 0.50-0.75 down lat-
eral surface of segment; without a narrow lightened or transparent ventral mar-
ginal or submarginal area. Hair 1-X 1-9b. Ventral brush with 6 pairs of hairs;
hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (2-5). Gills slender, tapered distally; dorsal subequal
to ventral or slightly longer, 1.1-3.5 length of saddle.
DISCUSSION. The Kompi Group is characterized as follows: in the adults by
(1) the bicolored head scales, and (2) the basal light marking on tarsal segment
1 of the foreleg and midleg; in the male genitalia by (1) the usually moderate
to strong pigmentation, and (2) the relatively short and broad aedeagus; in the
pupae by the strongly developed hairs 4,8-C; and in the larvae by (1) the patch
of usually numerous comb scales and the combination of (2) a weakly developed
hair 4C, and (3) 6 pairs of hairs in the ventral brush.
This group includes 6 species, burgeri, chionotum, kompi, niveoscutum, sandrae
and schicki. Each is differentiated from all the others by 1 or more novelties of
the adult and/or larva. The species are, in general, most easily and reliably sep-
arated as adults; the male genitalia are apparently indistinguishable. The 6 species
fall into 3 pairs, as follows: (1) kompi and burgeri, characterized by the usually
single hairs 5,6-C of the larva, the usually relatively few branched 1,2-I,II and
1,13-II-V of the larva and 1-III-V of the pupa, and the usual mesocaudal dis-
placement of 2-IV-VI of the pupa; (2) schicki and chionotum, characterized by
the presence of scattered light scales in the predominantly dark scaled areas of
the mesoscutum of the female, the conspicuous basal band on the abdominal
tergites of the male, and the usually multiple hairs 5,6-C on the head of the
larva; and (3) niveoscutum and sandrae, characterized by the predominantly dark
scaled midscutellar lobe in the female and the usually relatively highly branched
hairs 1,2-I,11 and 1,13-III-V of the larva and 1-III-V of the pupa in combination
with a relatively short siphon and paddle.
Most species of this group are characterized by strong sexual dimorphism in
adult ornamentation. In these, the mesoscutum of the male is completely or pre-
dominantly silver-white scaled while that of the female is extensively marked with.
dark scales.
The immature stages are found in treeholes, broken or cut bamboo internodes
and rockholes. Virtually nothing is known about the habits of the adults.
The species of the Kompi Group are found in mountainous regions from south-
eastern Arizona in the United States to western Guatemala. They are apparently
predominantly allopatric, separated either geographically or altitudinally.
KEYS TO SPECIES
FEMALES
ine Prosternum and metameron with well developed patch of scales; midlobe
of scutellum entirely or predominantly light scaled; dark scaled areas of
mesoscutum without scattered yellowish or whitish scales (figs. 13,14)
aR MA a lak ste ie Says ar eR yt ce MT Ue ke oT Mi 5. burgeri
Prosternum and/or metameron bare; if prosternum has patch of scales then
midlobe of scutellum predominantly dark scaled; if metameron has patch
of scales then dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with scattered yellowish
Or wWoitish scales toy te a eg oe le
40
2(1).
3(2).
4(3).
5(4).
2(1).
3(2).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Metameron with patch of scales; base of hindtarsal segment 1 conspicuously
white scaled dorsally; dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with numerous
scattered yellowish or whitish scales (fig. 13) . . . . . . . .7. schicki
Metameron without definite patch of scales, sometimes 1 or more scales
present; base of hindtarsal segment | entirely dark scaled or with only
a few white scales dorsally; dark scaled areas of mesoscutum without
scattered yellowish or whitish scales except in chionotum ..... .3
Prosternum with extensive patch of scales; midlobe of scutellum predom-
inantly dark scaled; inner posterior fossal area without conspicuous white
patch <a, ASget oc tees . . 9. niveoscutum
Prosternum without definite patch of ‘scales: midlobe of scutellum predom-
inantly light scaled, or if predominantly dark scaled then inner posterior
fossal area with conspicuous wilitedcaled patel.) vec. te: im a's tae 0 od A
Erect scales of head very long and narrow, their width at apex scarcely
greater than width at midheight; dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with
numerous scattered yellowish or whitish scales (fig. 13) . . 8. chionotum
Erect scales of head moderately long and moderately broadened distally,
their width at apex 2-4 times greater than width at midheight; dark
scaled areas of mesoscutum without scattered yellowish or whitish scales
“3
Midlobe of scutellum predominantly light scaled; silver lateral prescutellar
scale line moderately broad, conspicuous; inner posterior fossal area with-
out conspicuous white scaled patch, dark scaled, or if white scaled then
these white scales broadly joined to lateral prescutal white line (fig. 13)
; ' . 6. kompi
Midlobe of scutellum predominantly dark ‘scaled: ‘silver lateral prescutellar
scale line usually narrow, inconspicuous; inner posterior fossal area with
conspicuous white scaled patch (figs 13) serdar 1Ossamadrae
MALES
Mesoscutum with numerous brown scales in conspicuous broad complete
dorsocentral line. . . . . . .6.kompi
Mesoscutum entirely silver-white scaled | or with relatively few brown scales
Tiahdttow (COUN ele GOrsOcedtital UNC. ae ket wanes ee ww
Prosternum and metameron with well developed patch of scales; palpus as
long as or longer than proboscis (fig. 14). . . ... . . . 5. burgeri
Prosternum and/or metameron bare; if either prosternum or metameron has
patch of scales then palpus shorter than proboscis . .........3
Metameron with patch of scales; base of hindtarsal segment 1 conspicuously
white scaled dorsally; palpus shorter than proboscis . . . . .7. schicki
Metameron without definite patch of scales, sometimes with 1 or more
scales; base of hindtarsal segment 1 entirely dark scaled, or if white scaled
dorsally then palpus subequal in length or or longer than proboscis. . .4
4(3).
5(4).
2(1).
3(2).
2(1).
3(2).
4(2).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 41
Prosternum with extensive patch of scales; remigium (base of vein R) dark
scaled; palpus usually shorter than proboscis . . . . . 9.niveoscutum
Prosternum without definite patch of scales; remigium predominantly light
scaled; palpus subequal in length to or longer than proboscis . . . . .5
Abdominal tergites with conspicuous white basal band . . . 8. chionotum
Abdominal tergites not banded or with inconspicuous light basal band
. 10. sandrae
PUPAE
Hair 1-II usually 6-8b (5-11) and paddle index usually 1.4-1.6 (1.3-1.7); hair
5-IV usually double (1-4b) (figs. 19,21) . . . . 7. schicki; 8. chionotum
Hair 1-II with fewer branches and/or paddle index less; 5-IV usually single
(single or double)
Hair 2-V usually slightly to greatly cephalad of level of 3-V; paddle index
usually 1.1-1.3 (1.1-1.4) (figs. 23,25) . . . 9. niveoscutum; 10. sandrae
Hair 2-V PERN caudad of level of 3-V; Pee index hie 1.4-1.5 Ma 2-
te: gigas nee f bia ; , , ; .3
Hair 10-C moderately developed, distinctly finer and shorter than 12-C;
most primary branches of float hair (1-I) usually with numerous second-
ary branches; branches of 1-II usually moderately developed and finer
than primary branches mE ES LG eae bet . . 5. burgeri
Hair 10-C strongly developed, usually distinctly stouter and longer than 12-
C; most primary branches of float hair (1-I) without secondary branches;
branches of 1-II strongly developed, as or nearly as stout as primary
branches of dl 4fie, 19)-.5 isc-0 thcen\t. anet Gos Bie m teeeceee komm
LARVAE
Apex of larger comb scales produced into moderate-sized spine; most caudal
hair of ventral brush (4a-X) short, ba mer oe 1.0-1.5 length of anal
Saqdle thin, 26) 0 °F Soy ; . . . 10. sandrae
Apex of larger comb scales evenly fringed | or a or 2 apical elements of
fringe slightly Cat hair 4a-X she passes at least 2.0 length of
anal saddle . . . ie may 9 5 ESBS iol OT i
Hair 6-C usually 3-5b (2-6); siphon index greater than3.4 ...... .3
Hair 6-C single or double and/or siphon index less than3.2. . .... .4
Branches of hairs 1,13-II-V relatively stout and coarse to near apex; 1-III-V
usually 3,4b (2-5); hair 5-V-VII usually single or double (1-3b), the
branches stout and coarse to near apex (fig. 20) . . . . . . .7.schicki
Branches of hairs 1,13-II-V finer and tapering from near base; 1-III-V usu-
ally 6,7b (5-10); i aie 5-V-VII usually 4,5b eur ae the branches finer and
tapering from near base (fig. 22). . . . . 8. chionotum
Hair 5-C usually double (1-3b); hair 2-II usually 2,3b (2-4); hair 1-II-V
eae a 3,4b hs ne rk index ftv nd 2.7-3.0 (2. 5-3.1) (fig. 24).
: 9. niveoscutum
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Hair 5-C usually single (single or double); 2-II usually single (1-4b); hair
1-II-V usually 2,3b (1-4); siphon index frequently greater than 3.1 (2.5-
SO iD
5(4). Branches of hair 1-VIII finer than those of 1-X (fig. 16). . . . 5. burgeri
Branches of hair 1-VIII stouter than those of 1-X (fig. 18) . . . .6.kompi
5. Aedes (Protomacleaya) burgeri Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 10,13-16
TYPES: Holotype male with associated larval and pupal skins (UCLA 562-47), Bodie Canyon,
13 air km east of Lochiel, Santa Cruz Co., Arizona, United States of America, elevation about
1530 m, egg from rothole in living sycamore tree, 27 Dec 1969, L.T. Nielsen and T.J. Zavortink
[USNM]. Allotype female with associated larval and pupal skins (UCLA 562-71), same data
as holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 7 |pM (562-46,52,73,74,79,81,82), 20 lpF (562-44,50,53,54,
57-60,62-65 ,67,68,70,72,75-77,80), 1 pM (562-101), 1 pF (562-100), 12 M, 4 F, 1 M gen, 24 P,
272 L, same data as holotype (UCLA 562); 2 IpF (559-31,32), 1 M, 1 F,3 P, 64 L, same data as
holotype except eggs from rothole in living evergreen oak tree (UCLA 559); 4 lpM (567-20,
29,37,39), 7 IpF (567-23 ,24,26,32,34,36,40), 1 lp (567-38), 2 M, 1 M gen, 1 F, 9 P, 19 L,
same data as holotype except eggs from rothole in living evergreen oak tree (UCLA 567) [UCLA,
ISET, BM]; 20 M, 3 M gen, 20 F, 11 P, 14 L, same data as holotype except collected on 21 Mar
1968 by L.T. Nielsen, J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam (HA-12-68) [UTAH]. This species is dedi-
cated to the original collector, John F. Burger.
Aedes n.sp. near kompi of Zavortink (1970:8); Arnell and Nielsen (1972:16).
Aedes (Finlaya) kompi of Burger (1965:396-398); Stone (1967:208).
FEMALE (figs. 13,14). Wing: 4.00 mm. Proboscis: 2.45 mm. Forefemur: 2.49
mm. Abdomen: about 3.3 mm. Head: Erect scales moderately long and moder-
ately broad, their width at apex 2-4 times greater than width at midheight. Tho-
rax: Anterior dorsocentral bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral
prescutal and posterior fossal bristles few. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with-
out scattered yellowish or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines conspicuous; acros-
tichal line usually broad; lateral prescutellar line broad; posterior outer dorsocentral
line usually moderately broad; lateral marginal line very broad, usually extending
mesad to inner margin of fossa; posterior fossal line not broadened mesally and
forming a conspicuous more or less isolated patch. Midlobe of scutellum with
scales entirely or predominantly white. Most pleural patches dense and well de-
fined, consisting of broad flat to slightly outstanding imbricate silver-white scales.
Upper anterior ppn with scales moderately dense, most moderately broad to broad,
flat; pst with well developed oblique patch of scales; metameron with patch of
scales. Legs: Posterior surface of forefemur and midfemur with white streak usu-
ally confined to basal 0.5-0.6. Foretibia and midtibia entirely dark scaled or streak-
ed or speckled with white on posterior surface. Foretarsal segment | usually marked
with white on at least ventral and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.6; mid-
tarsal segment 1 usually marked with white on all surfaces in at least basal 0.6;
hindtarsal segment 1 usually entirely dark scaled.
MALE (fig. 14). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters and meso-
scutal ornamentation. Head: Palpus usually longer than proboscis; with numerous
long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum usually entirely
Zavortink: New World Aedes 43
silver-white scaled, rarely with a few dark scales in posterior inner dorsocentral
area. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) entirely dark scaled. Abdomen: Tergites
not banded or with narrow light scaled basal band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 15). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
of group. |
PUPA (fig. 15). Abdomen: about 3.8 mm. Trumpet: 0.54 mm. Paddle: 0.82
mm. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C moderately developed, distinctly finer and shorter
than 12-C. Abdomen: Float hair (1-1) moderately developed, with longest branches
not extending to lateral margin of segment I, and with most primary branches
usually with numerous secondary branches; branches of 1-II usually 3-5 (2-6), us-
ually moderately developed and finer than primary branches of 1-I; hair 1-III-V
usually 1-3b (1-4). Hair 2-IV-VI usually mesad of hair 1 of corresponding seg-
ment and usually relatively close to caudal margin of segment; 2-V usually caudad
of level of 3-V. Hair 5-IV single. Paddle: Index usually 1.4-1.5 (1.2-1.7).
LARVA (fig. 16). Head: 0.96 mm. Siphon: 0.99 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.38 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually single (single or double). Hair 6-C single. Hair 14-C usu-
ally single (single or double). Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 2,3b (1-4), the branches
normal. Hair 2-II usually single (1-4b). Hair 5-II-VII usually 3,4b (2-4), the branches
normal. Hair 13-II usually 4,5b (3-6) and 13-III-V usually 2-4b (1-4), the branches
normal; 13-VI usually 6-8b (4-9), the branches much shorter and finer than those
of 13-VII; hair 13-VII 2-4b. Segment VIII: Branches of hair 1 finer than branches
of 1-X. Comb scales usually 24-38 (22-50); apex of larger scales fringed. Siphon:
Index about 3.1-3.9. Anal Segment: Hair 4a-X long, at least 2.0 length of anal
saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes burgeri is closely related to kompi and is distinguished
from that species as follows: in the adult by (1) the entirely silver-white scaled
mesoscutum of the male, (2) the more conspicuous light mesoscutal markings of
the female, and (3) the presence of scales on the prosternum and metameron in
both sexes; in the pupa by (1) the usual presence of numerous secondary branches
on the primary branches of the float hair (1-1), and (2) the more weakly devel-
oped 10-C and 1-II; and in the larva by the weaker branches of hair 1-VIII. This
species is the only one in the Kompi Group that has a well developed patch of
scales on both the prosternum and metameron of the adult.
Except for variation in development of the lateral prescutal, acrostichal and
posterior outer dorsocentral light scale lines in the female, burgeri is relatively
uniform in all stages throughout most of its range. However, both the larva and
pupa are extremely variable at the southernmost locality at which the species
has been found, where it occurs with niveoscutum. Here the larva may have more
highly branched hairs and a shorter siphon than is normal and the pupa may have
more highly branched or abnormally developed hairs and a shorter paddle than
usual. This variation is indicative of hybridization and introgression between burg-
eri and niveoscutum.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of burgeri are found in treeholes. In the north-
ern portion of its range this species has been collected in oak-pine forest, ripar-
ian woodland and scattered groves of oaks where it has been associated | or
more times with Ae. (Abraedes) papago, Ae. (Kompia) purpureipes, Ae. (Och-
lerotatus) monticola Belkin & McDonald, 1957 and Ae. (O.) muelleri. In the south-
ern portion of its range it has been collected in oak-pine forest where it has oc-
curred alone or in association with another species of the Kompi Group, niveo-
scutum. Burger (1965:396) reported finding adults of burgeri (as kompi) resting
on the sides of a treehole and on nearby leaves.
44 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes burgeri extends from southeastern Arizona
in the United States to Jalisco in Mexico. In Arizona it has been collected at
elevations between 1070 and 1530 meters and in Mexico between 1400 and 1770
meters. Material examined: 1204 specimens; 145 males, 173 females, 614 larvae,
272 pupae; 109 individual rearings (106 larval, 2 pupal, 1 incomplete).
MEXICO. Jalisco: El Mirador (2.4 km S Quililla), 8 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T.
Nielsen (MEX 669), 1 lpM (669-10), 2 lpF (669-13,15), 1 M, 1 M gen, 2 P, 2 L; same data
(MEX 670), 1 M, 2 P, 3 L; same data (MEX 671), 1 lpM (671-13), 4 IpF (671-12,14-16), 4 M,
1 F, 5 P, 1 L; same data (MEX 675), 4 lpM (675-11-14), 6 IpF (675-15-17,19,22,23), 38 M,
1 M gen, 12 F, 56 P, 49 L [UCLA]; same data (N-22-71), 3 IpM (3,5,6), 6 IpF (7,9,10-13);
same data (N-23-71), 1 lpM (2), 1 lpF (1); same data (N-26-71), 2 IpM (1,2); same data (N-27-
71), 5 lpF (1-3,4,7) [UTAH]. Guadalajara (24 km NW), 7 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T.
Nielsen (MEX 667), 1 IpM (667-10), 4 lpF (667-11-14), 3 M, 1 M gen, 5 P, 13 L [UCLA].
Sinaloa: Potrerillos (5.7 km E), 11 June 1971, L.T. Nielsen and T.J. Zavortink (MEX 700), 8 lpM
(700-10-17), 4 lpF (700-18-21), 8 M, 2 M gen, 2 F, 15 P, 11 L [UCLA]; same data (N-51-71),
5 IpM (1-4,6), 1 lpF (5) [UTAH]. Sonora: Nogales (14.4 km S), 22 Aug 1970, J.H. Arnell and
L.T. Nielsen (HA-20-70), 7 M, 27 P, 50 L [UTAH].
UNITED STATES. Arizona: Bodie Canyon, Lochiel (13 km E), type series, see above. Men-
doza Canyon, Coyote Mountains, Pima Co., 23 Dec 1969, L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 550), 2 IpM
(500-30,34), 2 IlpF (550-31,32), 1 M gen, 9 L [UCLA]. Patagonia (3-6 km WSW), 18 Aug-
17 Sept 1964, J.F. Burger, 2 M, 2 M gen, 59 F, 2 P [UCLA], 3 M, 2 M gen, 7 F, 2 P [USNM]; 13
Sept 1968, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 454), 1 IpM (454-12), 1 M, 1 M gen [UCLA].
6. Aedes (Protomacleaya) kompi Vargas & Downs
Figs. 10,13,17,18
1950. Aedes (Gualteria) kKompi Vargas and Downs, 1950:167-170. TYPE: Holotype female,
Tepoztlan, Morelos, Mexico, larva from treehole or rockhole, 29 June 1947, W.G. Downs
[ISET].
Aedes (Finlaya) kompi of Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:165); Schick (1970a: 16).
FEMALE (fig. 13). Wing: 3.84 mm. Proboscis: 2.38 mm. Forefemur: 2.36 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.6 mm. Head: Erect scales moderately long, moderately broad,
their width at apex 2-4 times greater than width at midheight. Thorax: Anterior
dorsocentral bristles usually few and small or absent; humeral, lateral prescutal
and posterior fossal bristles few or absent. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with-
out scattered yellowish or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines relatively incon-
spicuous to conspicuous; acrostichal line usually present, narrow to moderately
broad; lateral prescutellar line moderately broad; posterior outer dorsocentral line
usually very narrow and incomplete; lateral marginal line narrow to very broad
and then extending mesad to inner margin of fossa; posterior fossal line very nar-
row to broad, not broadened mesally and forming a conspicuous more or less
isolated patch. Midlobe of scutellum with scales usually entirely or predominantly
light. Most pleural patches very dense and well defined, consisting of broad flat
to appressed imbricate silver-white scales. Upper anterior ppn with scales sparse
to moderately dense, moderately broad to broad, flat to appressed; pst usually
bare, rarely with scales near ppl; metameron bare. Legs: Posterior surface of fore-
femur and midfemur with white streak of basal portion extending to or near apex
as a narrow line. Foretibia and midtibia dark scaled or streaked or speckled with
white on posterior surface. Foretarsal segment 1 usually marked with white on
Zavortink: New World Aedes 45
at least ventral and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.4; midtarsal segment 1
usually marked with white on all surfaces in at least basal 0.5; hindtarsal seg-
ment 1 dark scaled.
MALE. Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus sub-
equal to proboscis in length or slightly longer; with relatively few long bristles
from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Conspicuous broad complete brown scaled
dorsocentral line developed. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) entirely dark scaled.
Abdomen: Tergites without basal band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 17). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
in group.
PUPA (fig. 17). Abdomen: about 3.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.55 mm. Paddle: 0.79
mm. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C strongly developed, at least as stout and long as
12-C. Abdomen: Float hair (1-I) moderately to strongly developed, with longest
branches usually extending to lateral margin of segment I, and with most pri-
mary branches unbranched; branches of 1-II usually 2-5 (2-7), strongly developed
and as or nearly as stout as primary branches of 1-I; hair 1-IIJ-V usually 1-3b
(1-4). Hair 2-IV-VI usually mesad of hair 1 of corresponding segment and usually
relatively close to caudal margin of segment; 2-V usually caudad of or at the level
of 3-V, sometimes slightly cephalad of it. Hair 5-IV usually single (single or dou-
ble). Paddle: Index usually 1.4-1.5 (1.2-1.6).
LARVA (fig. 18). Head: 0.92 mm. Siphon: 0.79 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.33 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually single (single or double). Hair 6-C single. Hair 14-C us-
ually single (single or double). Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 2,3b (1-3), the
branches normal. Hair 2-II usually single (1-3b). Hair 5-II-VII 2,3b, the branches
normal. Hair 13-II usually 3,4b (2-4) and 13-III-V usually 2,3b, the branches
normal; 13-VI usually 6-9b (5-11), the branches much shorter and finer than
those of 13-VII; hair 13-VII 2,3b. Segment VIII: Branches of hair 1 stronger than
branches of 1-X. Comb scales usually 35-55 (16-65); apex of larger scales fringed.
Siphon: Index usually 2.8-3.5 (2.5-3.9). Anal Segment: Hair 4a-X long, at least
2.0 length of anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes kompi is apparently most closely related to burgeri and
is distinguished from it as follows: in the adult by (1) the broad longitudinal
lines of dark scales on the mesoscutum of the male, (2) the more restricted light
mesoscutal markings of the female, and (3) the usual absence of scales on either
the prosternum or metameron; in the pupa by (1) the usual absence of second-
ary branches on most primary branches of the float hair (1-I), and (2) the more
strongly developed 10-C and 1-II; and in the larva by the stronger branches of
hair 1-VHI. Aedes kompi is conspicuously differentiated from all other species
of the group by the ornamentation of the mesoscutum of the male.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of kompi have been collected in treeholes and
holes in volcanic rock. In the former habitat they have been associated with 2
species of Aedes (Protomacleaya) in the Terrens Group, gabriel Schick, 1970 and
idanus Schick, 1970; in the latter habitat they have been found only with gabriel.
All known adults of kompi have been reared and nothing is known about their
habits.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes kompi is presently known from a single area
along the Southern Escarpment of the Mesa Central in the State of Morelos, Mex-
ico, at an elevation of about 1600 meters. Material examined: 170 specimens; 18
males, 12 females, 100 larvae, 40 pupae; 28 individual rearings (13 larval, 10 pu-
pal, 5 incomplete).
46 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
MEXICO. Morelos: Vicinity of Tepoztlan (including Gabriel Mariaca), 29 June 1947, W.G.
Downs, 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [USNM]; 7 Sept 1965, D.A. Schroeder (MEX 346), 3 pF (346-10,
100,101), 5 L; same data (MEX 349), 1 pM (349-100), 1 pF (349-101), 1 M gen, 4 L; same
data (MEX 350), 2 lpM (350-17,24), 1 IpF (350-25), 3 pM (350-93,106,112), 4 Ip (350-12,
30-32), 4 M, 3 M gen, 11 P, 72 L; same data (MEX 351), 2 pM (351-100,101), 1 M gen,
1 P, 1 L; same data (MEX 352), 2 IpM (352-12,17); 11 Aug 1970, K. and D.A. Schroeder
(MEX 619), 1 lpM (619-11), 5 lpF (619-16-19,25), 1 lp (619-27), 1 M; same data (MEX 620),
1 IpF (620-17); same data (MEX 624), 1 lpM (624-30) [UCLA].
7. Aedes (Protomacleaya) schicki Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 10,13,19,20
TYPES: Holotype male with associated larval and pupal skins (MEX 698-22), 4.8 km E of
La Emerta, Durango, Mexico, elevation about 2620 m, larva from rothole in living oak tree,
11 June 1971, L.T. Nielsen and T.J. Zavortink [USNM]. Allotype female with associated larval
and pupal skins (MEX 698-14), same data as holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 11 lpM (698-10-
13,15-19,21,23), 1 lpF (698-20), 4 F, 3 M gen, 3 L, same data as holotype (MEX 698) [UCLA,
ISET, BM]; 1 lpM (4), 2 IpF (1,2), 3 pM (3,7,8), 1 pF (5), same data as holotype (N-50-71)
[UTAH]. This species is dedicated to Robert X. Schick in recognition of his contributions to
the knowledge of Protomacleaya.
FEMALE (fig. 13). Wing: 4.53 mm. Proboscis: 2.80 mm. Forefemur: 2.59 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.3 mm. Head: Erect scales moderately long and relatively nar-
row, width at apex 1.5-2.5 times width at midheight. Thorax: Anterior dorso-
central bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and pos-
terior fossal bristles numerous. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with numerous
yellowish or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines relatively inconspicuous; acros-
tichal line absent, narrow and broken, or moderately broad; lateral prescutellar
line narrow and broken to moderately broad; posterior outer dorsocentral line
narrow and broken to moderately broad; lateral marginal line narrow; posterior
fossal line narrow, sometimes broadened and denser mesally and then appearing
as a patch. Midlobe of scutellum entirely or predominantly light scaled. Most
pleural patches dense and moderately well defined, consisting of broad flat to
outstanding somewhat disheveled white scales. Upper anterior ppn with scales mod-
erately dense, narrow and curved to moderately broad and flat; pst sometimes
with scales near ppl; metameron with patch of scales. Legs: Posterior surface of
forefemur and midfemur with white streak usually extending from base to or
near apex. Foretibia usually conspicuously streaked with white from near base
to near apex on posterior surface; midtibia entirely dark scaled or posterior sur-
face speckled or streaked or white. Foretarsal segment 1 marked with white on
ventral and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.6; midtarsal segment 1 marked
with white on all surfaces in at least basal 0.6; hindtarsal segment | with a con-
spicuous white streak or patch at base of dorsal surface.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters and mesoscutal ornamen-
tation. Head: Palpus distinctly shorter than proboscis; with numerous long bristles
from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum usually entirely silver-white
scaled, rarely with a few dark scales in posterior inner dorsocentral area. Wing:
Remigium (base of vein R) partially to entirely light scaled. Abdomen: Tergites
usually with conspicuous white scaled basal band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 19). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
in group.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 47
PUPA (fig. 19). Abdomen: about 4.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.72 mm. Paddle: 1.12
mm. Apparently indistinguishable from chionotum. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C mod-
erately to strongly developed, usually longer and stronger than 12-C. Abdomen:
Float hair (1-I) moderately to very strongly developed, with longest branches some-
times extending beyond lateral margin of segment I, and with primary branches
with or without secondary branches; branches of 1-II usually 6-8 (5-11), strongly
developed and finer than or subequal in stoutness to primary branches of 1-I;
hair 1-III-V usually 3-6b (2-6). Hair 2-IV-VI usually in line with or laterad of
hair 1 of corresponding segment and usually relatively far from caudal margin
of segment; 2-V far cephalad of level of 3-V. Hair 5-IV usually double (2,3b).
Paddle: Index usually 1.4-1.6 (1.3-1.7).
LARVA (fig. 20). Head: 1.12 mm. Siphon: 1.17 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.41 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually double (1-3b). Hair 6-C 3,4b (2-4). Hair 14-C usually dou-
ble. Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 3,4b (2-5), the branches relatively stout and
coarse to near apex. Hair 2-II usually 2-4b. Hair 5-II-[V usually 3,4b (2-4) and
5-V-VII usually single or double (1-3b), the branches relatively stout and coarse
to near apex. Hair 13-II-V usually 3-5b (3-6), the branches relatively stout and
coarse to near apex; 13-VI usually 8-15b (7-17), the branches much shorter and
finer than those of 13-VII; hair 13-VII usually 3,4b. Segment VIII: Branches of
hair 1 subequal in strength to or stronger than branches of 1-X. Comb scales us-
ually 25-42 (24-49); apex of larger scales usually fringed. Siphon: Index about
3.9-4.6 (3.5-5.0). Anal Segment: Hair 4a-X long, usually at least 2.0 length of
anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes schicki is readily separated from the most closely re-
lated species, chionotum, as follows: in the adult by (1) the shorter and broader
erect scales on the head of the female, (2) the shorter palpus of the male, (3)
the presence of scales on the metameron, and (4) the conspicuous patch of white
scales at the base of hindtarsal segment 1; and in the larva by hairs 1-I-VI, 5-
II-VII and 13-II-V, which have fewer, rigid, stout branches. Pupae of the 2 spec-
ies are apparently indistinguishable. The presence of a definite patch of scales
on the metameron but not on the prosternum of the adult and the stout rigid
hairs of the larva of schicki are unique developments within the Kompi Group.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of schicki are found in treeholes where they may
be associated with the immatures of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) muelleri. The habits
of the adults are unknown. The species is apparently restricted to montane oak-
pine forest.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes schicki has been collected at elevations from
2350 to 2620 meters in the Sierra Madre Occidental in northcentral Mexico. Ma-
terial examined: 83 specimens; 16 males, 12 females, 29 larvae, 26 pupae; 24
individual rearings (20 larval, 4 pupal).
MEXICO. Durango: Durango (52 km W), 3 July 1967, G.A. Schroeder (MEX 488), 3 IpF
(488-11-13), 2 P, 6 L [UCLA]. La Emerta (4 km E), type series, see above.
8. Aedes (Protomacleaya) chionotum Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 10,13,21,22
TYPES: Holotype female with associated larval and pupal skins (MEX 304-20), 6.9 km N
of Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, elevation near 2080 m, larva from treehole, 19 Aug 1965,
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
R.X. Schick and D.A. Schroeder [USNM]. Allotype male with associated pupal skin and geni-
talia (MEX 304-11), same data as holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 2 IpF (304-19,22), 2 pM (304-
10,12), 6 Ip (304-15-18,21,23), 2 M gen, 1 P, 5 L, same data as holotype (MEX 304) [UCLA,
ISET, BM].
FEMALE (fig. 13). Wing: 4.17 mm. Proboscis: 2.39 mm. Forefemur: 2.20 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.7 mm. Head: Erect scales long and narrow, their width at
apex scarcely greater than width at midheight. Thorax: Anterior dorsocentral bris-
tles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal
bristles few. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum with numerous scattered yellowish
or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines relatively inconspicuous; acrostichal line
absent to narrow and broken; lateral prescutellar line narrow and broken to mod-
erately broad; posterior outer dorsocentral line narrow; lateral marginal line nar-
row; posterior fossal line narrow, sometimes broadened and denser mesally and
then appearing as a patch. Midlobe of scutellum entirely or predominantly light
scaled. Most pleural patches moderately dense and moderately well defined, con-
sisting of broad flat to outstanding disheveled white scales. Upper anterior ppn
with scales sparse, most narrow, curved; pst and metameron bare. Legs: Posterior
surface of hindfemur and midfemur with white streak extending from base to or
near apex. Foretibia and midtibia frequently streaked with white from near base
to near apex on posterior surface. Foretarsal segment 1 usually marked with white
on ventral and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.4; midtarsal segment 1 usually
marked with white on dorsal and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.5; hind-
tarsal segment 1 sometimes with a few light scales at base of dorsal surface.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters and mesoscutal ornamen-
tation. Head: Erect scales not unusually long or narrow. Palpus subequal in length
to or longer than proboscis; with numerous long bristles from apex of segment
3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum entirely silver-white scaled or with a few pos-
terior inner dorsocentral scales dark. Pleural patches with scales less disheveled
than in female. Upper anterior ppn with scales denser, broader and flatter than
in female. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) partially to entirely light scaled. Ab-
domen: Tergites with conspicuous white scaled basal band.
MALE GENITALIA. (fig. 21). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
in group.
PUPA (fig. 21). Abdomen: about 3.7 mm. Trumpet: 0.73 mm. Paddle: 0.95
mm. Apparently indistinguishable from schicki. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C strongly
developed, subequal in stoutness to and longer than 12-C. Abdomen: Float hair
(1-I) strongly developed, with longest branches not extending to lateral margin
of segment I, and with primary branches with or without secondary branches;
branches of 1-II usually 6-8 (5-8), strongly developed, as stout as primary branches
of 1-I; hair 1-III-V 3-6b. Hair 2-IV-VI usually in line with or laterad of hair 1
of corresponding segment and usually relatively far from caudal margin of seg-
ment; 2-V far cephalad of level of 3-V. Hair 5-IV usually double (1-4b). Paddle:
Index 1.5-1.6.
LARVA (fig. 22). Head: 1.04 mm. Siphon: 1.11 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.40 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually 3b (2-4). Hair 6-C usually 4,5b (4-7). Hair 14-C usually
2-4b (1-5). Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 5-8b (5-10), the branches normal. Hair
2-II usually 4-6b (3-8). Hair 5-II-[V usually 6-8b (5-10) and 5-V-VII usually 4,5b
(3-6), the branches normal. Hair 13-II-V usually 6-9b (4-11), the branches nor-
mal; 13-VI usually 9-14b (7-17), the branches much shorter and finer than those
of 13-VII; hair 13-VII usually 5,6b (4-7). Segment VIII: Branches of hair 1 sub-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 49
equal in strength to or finer than branches of 1-X. Comb scales usually 24-34
(21-40); apex of larger scales usually fringed. Siphon: Index about 3.5-4.1. Anal
Segment: Hair 4a-X long, usually at least 2.0 length of anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes chionotum is closely related to schicki and may be dis-
tinguished from it as follows: in the adult by (1) the long narrow erect scales
on the head of the female, (2) the longer palpus of the male, (3) the absence
of scales on the metameron, and (4) the absence of a conspicuous patch of white
scales at the base of hindtarsal segment 1; and in the larva by hairs 1-I-VI, 5-
II-VII and 13-II-V, which have more numerous, flexible, tapering branches. The
pupae of the 2 species appear to be indistinguishable. The long narrow erect
scales on the head of the female and the highly branched larval hairs serve to
separate chionotum from all other species of the Kompi Group.
BIONOMICS. The immature stages of chionotum have been found in treeholes;
they have not been associated with any other species of mosquito. Habits of the
adults are unknown. This species is apparently restricted to high elevation forests.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes chionotum is known from the Mexican States
of Morelos and Oaxaca at elevations of 2080 to 2210 meters. Material examined:
74 specimens; 3 males, 3 females, 55 larvae, 13 pupae; 12 individual rearings (3
larval, 3 pupal, 6 incomplete).
MEXICO. Morelos: Cuernavaca (6.9 km N), type series, cited above. Oaxaca: Vivero Rancho
Teja, Ixtlan de Juarez, 3 July 1970, D.A. and K. Schroeder (MEX 518), 35 L; same data (MEX
521), 6 L [UCLA].
9. Aedes (Protomacleaya) niveoscutum Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 10,13,23,24
TYPES: Holotype male with associated larval and pupal skins (MEX 669-12), El Mirador
(2.4 km S Quililla), Jalisco, Mexico, elevation about 1710 m, larva from rothole in living oak
tree, 8 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen [USNM]. Allotype female with associated
larval and pupal skins (MEX 675-18), same data as holotype [USNM]. Paratypes: 1 lpM (669-
14), 2 lpF (669-11,16), 1 M, 1 P, same data as holotype (MEX 669); 2 IpM (670-10,11), 1 M
gen, same data as holotype (MEX 670); 2 IpF (671-10,11), 1 M, 1 P, same data as holotype
(MEX 671); 1 IpM (675-10), 3 lpF (675-20,21,24), 61 M, 3 M gen, 22 F, 83 P, 18 L, same
data as holotype (MEX 675) [UCLA, BM, ISET]; 2 lpM (1,2), 1 lpF (4), 1 pM (8), same data
as holotype (N-22-71); 1 IpM (3), same data as holotype (N-23-71); 1 lpM (8), 2 lpF (5,6),
same data as holotype (N-27-71) [UTAH].
FEMALE (fig. 13). Wing: 4.21 mm. Proboscis: 2.73 mm. Forefemur: 2.55 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.1 mm. Head: Erect scales moderately long and moderately
broad, their width at apex 2 or 3 times greater than width at midheight. Thorax:
Anterior dorsocentral bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral pre-
scutal and posterior fossal bristles few. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum without
yellowish or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines predominantly inconspicuous;
acrostichal line complete, narrow to moderately broad; lateral prescutellar line us-
ually narrow and broken; posterior outer dorsocentral line poorly developed, nar-
row and incomplete; lateral marginal line usually moderately broad anteriorly, re-
mainder narrow to moderately broad; posterior fossal line absent to weakly de-
veloped and narrow, never broadened mesally to form a patch. Midlobe of scu-
tellum with scales predominantly dark. Most pleural patches dense and well de-
fined, consisting of broad flat to appressed imbricate scales. Upper anterior ppn
50 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
with scales usually dense, moderately broad to broad, appressed; pst with well
developed oblique patch of scales; metameron bare or with a few scales. Legs:
Posterior surface of forefemur and midfemur with white streak extending from
base to or near apex. Foretibia and usually midtibia streaked or speckled with
white on posterior surface. Foretarsal segment 1 usually marked with white on
at least posterior and ventral surfaces in at least basal 0.4; midtarsal segment |
usually marked with white on at least dorsal, posterior and ventral surfaces in
at least basal 0.4; hindtarsal segment 1 dark scaled.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters and mesoscutal ornamen-
tation. Head: Palpus shorter than proboscis; with relatively few long bristles from
apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum entirely silver-white scaled or rarely
with a few posterior inner dorsocentral scales dark. Wing: Remigium (base of vein
R) entirely dark scaled. Abdomen: Tergites without basal band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 23). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
of group.
PUPA (fig. 23). Abdomen: about 3.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.58 mm. Paddle: 0.83
mm. Apparently indistinguishable from sandrae. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C mod-
erately to strongly developed, subequal in stoutness and length to 12-C or stouter
and longer. Abdomen: Float hair (1-1) moderately to strongly developed, with
longest branches sometimes extending to lateral margin of segment I, and with
primary branches with or without secondary branches; branches of 1-II usually
4-6 (3-7), moderately to strongly developed and finer than or subequal in stout-
ness to primary branches of 1-I; hair 1-III-V usually 2-4b (2-5). Hair 2-[V-VI us-
ually in line with or laterad of hair 1 of corresponding segment and usually mod-
erately far from caudal margin of segment; 2-V usually slightly to greatly ceph-
alad of level of 3-V. Hair 5-IV usually single (single or double). Paddle: Index
usually 1.2-1.3 (1.2-1.4).
LARVA (fig. 24). Head: 1.07 mm. Siphon: 0.92 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.40 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually double (1-3b). Hair 6-C usually single or double (1-3b).
Hair 14-C usually double (single or double). Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 3,4b
(2-5), the branches normal. Hair 2-I] usually 2,3b (2-4). Hair 5-H-VI usually 3-5b
(3-6) and 5-VII usually 2,3b, the branches normal. Hair 13-II-V usually 3-5b (2-
6), the branches normal; 13-VI usually 4-6b (4-8), the branches shorter and us-
ually slightly finer than those of 13-VII; hair 13-VII 3,4b. Segment VIL: Branches
of hair 1 finer to stouter than branches of 1-X. Comb scales usually 25-40 (22-
50); apex of larger scales evenly fringed or 1 or 2 apical elements of fringe slightly
enlarged. Siphon: Index usually 2.7-3.0 (2.5-3.1). Anal Segment: Hair 4a-X long,
usually at least 2.0 length of anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. This species differs from the closely related sandrae as follows:
in the adult by (1) the shorter and sparsely bristled palpus of the male, (2) the
absence of a white scaled patch at the union of the posterior fossal and posterior
outer dorsocentral lines on the mesoscutum of the female, (3) the presence of
a patch of scales on the prosternum, and (4) the dark scaled remigium (base of
vein R) of the wing of the male; and in the larva by (1) the absence of a definite
moderate-sized spine at the apex of the larger comb scales, and (2) the longer
hair 4a-X. Pupae of niveoscutum and sandrae are apparently indistinguishable.
Aedes niveoscutum differs from all other members of the Kompi Group in the
presence of a well developed patch of scales on the prosternum but not on the
metameron of the adults and in the sparsely bristled palpus of the male.
There is considerable variation in the single population of niveoscutum that
Zavortink: New World Aedes 51
has been studied. In the adults the normally short palpus of the male is occa-
sionally as long as the proboscis, the usually narrow lateral prescutal line of the
female is sometimes broadened, and the typically bare metameron often has a
few scales. Since all of these variations are in the direction of burgeri, which oc-
curs with this population of niveoscutum, they are probably the result of hybrid-
ization with that species. In the immatures the branches of many hairs are fre-
quently reduced in number and strength. This variability may also be due to hy-
bridization with burgeri or, since variability of this type and degree is exhibited
by the immatures of the closely related sandrae, it may be inherent in this lineage.
BIONOMICS. The immature stages of niveoscutum are found in treeholes where
they may be associated with burgeri. Habits of the adults are unknown.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). This species is presently known from only the type
locality in the State of Jalisco, Mexico, at an elevation of about 1710 meters.
It probably extends southward at appropriate elevations in the Sierra Madre del
Sur. Material examined: 251 specimens; 74 males, 33 females, 38 larvae, 106 pu-
pae; 21 individual rearings (20 larval, 1 pupal).
MEXICO. Jalisco: El Mirador, type series, cited above.
10. Aedes (Protomacleaya) sandrae Zavortink, n.sp.
Figs. 10,13,25,26
TYPES: Holotype female with associated larval and pupal skins (GUA 125-11), Hipodromo
del Norte in Guatemala City, Guatemala, Guatemala, elevation near 1500 m, larva from cut or
broken bamboo internode, 4 Sept 1964, V.P. Cowsill and W. Almengor [USNM]. Allotype male
with associated pupal skin and genitalia (GUA 125-100), same data as holotype [USNM]. Para-
types: 1 \IpF (125-12), 2 pF (125-103,105) (GUA 125), same data as holotype [UCLA]. This
species is dedicated to Sandra J. Heinemann in recognition of her contributions to the project
“Mosquitoes of Middle America.”
FEMALE (fig. 13). Wing: 4.13 mm. Proboscis: 2.64 mm. Forefemur: 2.31 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.0 mm. Head: Erect scales moderately long and moderately
broad, their width at apex 2-4 times greater than width at midheight. Thorax:
Anterior dorsocentral bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral pre-
scutal and posterior fossal bristles few. Dark scaled areas of mesoscutum without
scattered yellowish or whitish scales. Light mesoscutal lines conspicuous; acros-
tichal and posterior outer dorsocentral lines narrow; lateral prescutellar line nar-
row, frequently broken; lateral marginal line broadened anteriorly, remainder nar-
row to moderately broad; posterior fossal line broadened mesally, forming a con-
spicuous patch. Midlobe of scutellum predominantly dark scaled. Most pleural
patches very dense and well defined, consisting of broad closely appressed im-
bricate silver-white scales. Upper anterior ppn with scales usually dense, moder-
ately broad to broad, appressed and imbricate; pst and metameron bare. Legs:
Posterior surface of forefemur and midfemur with white streak of basal portion
narrowing and extending to or near apex. Foretibia and midtibia usually weakly
marked with white on posterior surface. Foretarsal segment | marked with white
on ventral and posterior surfaces in at least basal 0.3; midtarsal segment | marked
with white on all surfaces in at least basal 0.3; hindtarsal segment 1 dark scaled.
MALE. Essentially as in female except for sexual characters and mesoscutal
ornamentation. Head: Palpus subequal in length to proboscis; apparently with
52 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
numerous long bristles from apex of segment 3 distad. Thorax: Mesoscutum en-
tirely silver-white scaled. Wing: Remigium (base of vein R) entirely light scaled.
Abdomen: Some tergites without basal band, some with narrow light scaled band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 25). Apparently indistinguishable from other species
in group.
PUPA (fig. 25). Abdomen: about 3.4 mm. Trumpet: 0.67 mm. Paddle: 0.82.
mm. Apparently indistinguishable from niveoscutum. Cephalothorax: Hair 10-C
moderately to strongly developed, usually slightly stouter and longer than 12-C.
Abdomen: Float hair (1-I) very strongly developed, with longest branches extend-
ing at least to lateral margin of segment I, and with primary branches with or
without secondary branches; branches of 1-II usually 4-6 (3-7), strongly devel-
oped and subequal in stoutness to primary branches of 1-I; hair 1-III-V usually
3-5b (1-5). Hair 2-IV-VI usually in line with or laterad of hair 1 of correspond-
ing segment and usually relatively far from caudal margin of segment; 2-V far
cephalad of level of 3-V. Hair 5-IV single. Paddle: Index 1.1-1.3.
LARVA (fig. 26). Head: 0.92 mm. Siphon: 0.83 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.32 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually 2,3b (1-4). Hair 6-C usually 2-4b (1-5). Hair 14-C usu-
ally double. Abdomen: Hair 1-II-V usually 2-4b (1-6), the branches normal. Hair
2-II usually 2,3b (2-4). Hair 5-II-VII 3-5b, the branches normal. Hair 13-II-V us-
ually 3-5b (2-6), the branches normal; 13-VI usually 4b (3-5), the branches sim-
ilar in length and stoutness to those of 13-VII; hair 13-VII 3,4b. Segment VIII:
Branches of hair 1 subequal in strength to or finer or stouter than branches of
1-X. Comb scales usually 24-33 (22-38); apex of larger scales produced into a
moderate-sized spine. Siphon: Index about 2.7-3.9. Anal Segment: Hair 4a-X short,
usually only 1.0-1.5 length of anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes sandrae is most- closely related to niveoscutum from
which it differs as follows: in the adult by (1) the longer and densely bristled
palpus of the male, (2) the presence of a conspicuous white scaled patch at the
juncture of the posterior fossal and posterior outer dorsocentral lines on the meso-
scutum of the female, (3) the absence of a patch of scales on the prosternum,
and (4) the presence of light scales on the remigium (base of vein R) of the
wing in the male; and in the larva by (1) the presence of a definite moderate-
sized spine at the apex of the larger comb scales, and (2) the shortened hair
4a-X. Pupae of the 2 species appear to be indistinguishable. Aedes sandrae is dif-
ferentiated from all other species in the Kompi Group by the 2 larval characters
mentioned above.
There is considerable variability in the number-and strength of the branches
of many hairs in the larva and pupa. Particularly noticeable is the variation in
hairs 5,6-C on the head of the larva. This variation is frequently, but not invar-
iably, correlated with dimorphism of the antennae and mouthbrushes, as follows:
larvae with hairs 5,6-C single or double usually have short antennae and pectinate
mouthbrushes; those with hairs 5,6-C 3-5-branched usually have long antennae and
simple mouthbrushes.
BIONOMICS. Larvae and pupae of sandrae have been collected in treeholes
and broken or cut bamboo internodes. At lower elevations they have been assoc-
iated with Aedes (Protomacleaya) podographicus Dyar and Knab, 1906, a mem-
ber of the Terrens Group. The single female from Mexico was taken in. a biting-
landing collection with human bait at dusk; adults of Ae. (P.) sumidero Schick,
1970, another species of the Terrens Group, were associated with it.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes sandrae has been found in southern Mexico
Zavortink: New World Aedes 53
and western Guatemala at elevations of 200 to 2000 meters. Material examined:
35 specimens; 1 male, 5 females, 24 larvae, 5 pupae; 5 individual rearings (2 lar-
val, 3 pupal).
GUATEMALA. Esquintla: Esquintla (7-8 km SW), 10 July 1964, V.P. Cowsill (GUA 41),
1 L [UCLA], Guatemala: Guatemala City, Bethania, 15 July 1964, T.J. Zavortink and V.P.
Cowsill (GUA 44), 2 L [UCLA]. Guatemala City, Hipodromo del Norte, type series, see above.
Solola: San Andres Semetabal, 17 July 1964, V.P. Cowsill (GUA 51), 19 L [UCLA].
MEXICO. Chiapas: Sumidero (24 km N Tuxtla Gutierrez), 17 Aug 1964, E. Fisher and D.
Verity (MEX 128), 1 F [UCLA].
KNABI GROUP
11. Aedes (Protomacleaya) knabi (Coquillett)
Figs. 10,27,28
1906. Culex knabi Coquillett, 1906b:183-184. TYPE: Lectotype female with associated pupal
skin (291a), Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico, 1 July 1905, F. Knab [USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight, 1956:220].
Aedes (Finlaya) knabi of Dyar (1928:226-227); Edwards (1932:152); Knight and Marks (1952:
538,563); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:164).
Aedes knabi of Dyar (1906:16); Dyar and Knab (1906:203); Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:
841-842).
Aedes (?Gualteria) knabi of Dyar (1918:73).
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) knabi.of Dyar (1922d:160).
Ochlerotatus knabi of Coquillett (1906c: 18,21).
FEMALE. Wing: 5.14 mm. Proboscis: 2.96 mm. Forefemur: 3.13 mm. Abdo-
men: about 3.7 mm. Head: Integument yellow to tan. Erect scales and narrow
curved scales unicolorous, golden. Thorax: Integument yellow to tan. Acrostichal,
anterior dorsocentral, humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles few,
moderately to strongly developed. Mesoscutum entirely covered with small yel-
low or golden scales and larger cream-yellow, yellow or golden scales except for
inconspicuous to ‘conspicuous inner dorsocentral line of small bronzy or brown
scales. Midlobe of scutellum with scales sparse or dense, narrow and curved or
broad and flat, yellow to golden. Ppn scales broad and flat and/or narrow and
curved, yellow to golden. Pleural scale patches silver-white; psp scales absent; ssp
scales absent or few; pst and metameron bare. Legs: Posterior or ventral surface
of forefemur and midfemur with light scales restricted to basal 0.5-0.7. Knee spot
absent on foreleg, absent to small on midleg, small on hindleg. Tibiae dark scaled
or with short pale streak at base of posterior surface on foreleg and midleg. Tar-
sal segment 1 of foreleg and midleg with poorly defined light ring in basal 0.5-
1.0; tarsal segment 1 of hindleg with very poorly defined light streak or band
in basal portion; tarsal segment 2 of all legs with light ring or band in basal 0.4-
1.0; tarsal segments 3 and 4 of foreleg and midleg sometimes light scaled dor-
sally. Claws of hindleg with acute submedian tooth. Wing: Without light scales
at base of costa or vein R. Abdomen: Tergites II-VIII dark scaled with baso-
lateral light patch. Basal sternites light scaled, distal dark scaled with basolateral
light patch or basal light band that is broader laterally.
MALE. Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus en-
54 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
tirely dark scaled; palpal bristles not discernible. Thorax: Mesoscutum entirely
golden scaled except for a very few posterior inner dorsocentral brown scales.
Legs: Larger claw of foreleg and midleg with very small basal external tooth;
claws of hindleg with an acute submedian tooth. Wing: Remigium (base of vein
R) dark scaled.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 27). Sidepiece: Apparently weakly to moderately pig-
mented. Basal tergomesal area slightly swollen; setae of basal tergomesal area rel-
atively numerous, apparently arising from a moderately sclerotized plaque; med-
ian sternomesal sclerite moderately developed; median sternomesal tuft apparently
moderately developed, the setae apparently strongly curved dorsad. Claspette: Fil-
ament angulate. Phallosome: Aedeagus relatively long and slender, length about
2.5 greatest width.
PUPA (fig. 27). Abdomen: about 4.0 mm. Trumpet: 0.60 mm. Paddle: 1.05
mm. Hairs moderately strong and moderately pigmented. Cephalothorax: Hairs
4,8-C weakly to moderately developed, short; 8-C shorter and finer than 9-C.
Trumpet: Golden brown to brown. Abdomen: Hair 1-II with 4-6 moderately de-
veloped short branches; 1-III-V double. Hair 6-I,]] moderately developed, much
finer than 3-I,II. Hair 9-III-VI fine, short. Paddle: Apex produced.
LARVA (fig. 28). Head: 1.25 mm. Siphon: 1.32 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.54 mm.
Head: Labrum produced medially in dorsal aspect. Hair 1-C fine, arising relatively
far from edge of labrum. Hair 4-C moderately developed, with 6-10 moderately
long branches; located midway between midline and 6-C. Hairs 5,6-C single. Hair
7-C 2-4b. Hair 15-C enlarged, 25-35b. Mental plate not distinctly triangular; 1
or 2 of the more lateral teeth conspicuously enlarged. Antenna: Shaft with num-
erous small spicules. Thorax: Pigment absent. Hairs 1,5-P single. Abdomen: Hair
12-I present. Segment VIII: Comb scales 16-30, in an irregular patch. Siphon:
Index about 3.0. Acus attached. Pecten: teeth 28-47. Hair 1-S single. Anal Seg-
ment: Saddle large, extending 0.75-0.85 down lateral surface of segment; appar-
ently without a narrow lightened or transparent ventral margin or submarginal
area. Hair 1-X single. Ventral brush with 7 pairs of hairs; hairs 4b,4c-X 5-7b.
Gills tapered distally; dorsal subequal to ventral in length, about 1.0-1.2 length
of saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes knabi is characterized as follows: in the adult by (1)
the yellow to tan integument of the head and thorax, (2) the predominantly yel-
low to golden scales of the head and mesoscutum, and (3) the toothed claws of
the hindleg; in the male genitalia by the differentially sclerotized plaque from
which the setae of the basal tergomesal area arise; in the pupa by the combina-
tion of (1) the short hairs 4,8-C, and (2) the pointed or produced paddle apex;
and in the larva by (1) the produced labrum, (2) the fine hair 1-C, (3) the en-
larged and many branched 15-C, and (4) the much enlarged lateral teeth of the
mental plate.
Aedes knabi has so many unique developments, especially in the adult and larva,
that I am placing it into a separate group. The many unusual characteristics of
this species indicate a long history for the lineage leading to it.
Aedes knabi is known from only the small type series and 1 male with its
associated pupal skin and 1 larva in the UCLA collection. All of the immatures
and the only male genitalia are in very poor condition and inaccuracies may have
been introduced into the illustrations reconstructed from these.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of knabi have been collected only in treeholes.
They were associated with Ae. (P.) tehuantepec Schick, 1970 in 1 collection. All
Zavortink: New World Aedes 55
known adults are reared and nothing is known about their habits.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 10). Aedes knabi is known at present from only the vicin-
ity of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico, at elevations below 100 meters. Material ex-
amined: 14 specimens; 1 male, 5 females, 4 larvae, 4 pupae; 4 individual rearings
(2 larval, 1 pupal, 1 incomplete).
MEXICO. Oaxaca: Salina Cruz, 15 July 1905, F. Knab (307), 2 IpF (307d,g), 1 lp (307c),
2 F (307a,b) [USNM]; 9 Aug 1964, D. Verity (MEX 104), 1 pM (104-10), 1 M gen, 1 L
[UCLA]. Tehuantepec, 1 July 1905, F, Knab (291), 1 F (291b) [USNM].
Subgenus KOMPIA Aitken
1941. Kompia Aitken, 1941:81-82. TYPE SPECIES: Aedes (Kompia) purpureipes Aitken,
1941, Mexico; monobasic and original designation.
12. Aedes (Kompia) purpureipes Aitken
Figs. 29-32
1941. Aedes (Kompia) purpureipes Aitken, 1941:82-84. TYPE: Holotype female, Triunfo,
Baja California Sur, Mexico, 7 July 1938, A.E. Michelbacher and E.S. Ross [CAS].
Aedes (Kompia) purpureipes of Aitken (1942:167); Belkin and McDonald (1957:190); McDonald
(1957b:529-535); Mattingly (1961:38); Stone (1967:208); Zavortink (1970:8).
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) purpureipes of Vargas (1949:261-265; 1950:64-65); Carpenter and LaCasse
(1955:220-221); Mattingly (1958:6); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:151).
FEMALE (fig. 30). Wing: 3.13 mm. Proboscis: 2.29 mm. Forefemur: 2.02 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.9 mm. Dark scales of head, proboscis, palpus, legs and abdo-
men with metallic blue, violet or purple reflections. Head: Eyes broadly separ-
ated above antennae, the resulting space with broad flat silver scales. Integument
light to dark brown. Frontal bristles absent. Orbital bristles relatively few, mesal
4-7 pairs strongly developed, lateral 3 or 4 pairs moderately developed. Vertex
with relatively few black proclinate erect scales and with broad flat silver scales
and sometimes appressed curved creamish-yellow to golden scales medially, broad
flat black scales submedially and broad flat silver scales laterally. Occiput with
numerous upright black and yellow erect scales and creamish-yellow to golden
predominantly narrow and curved decumbent scales. Orbital line of broad flat sil-
ver scales present. Dorsolateral surface with black, silver and yellowish broad
flat scales. Lateral and ventral surfaces with yellowish broad flat scales. Clypeus
moderately large, bare. Proboscis relatively stout, longer than forefemur; entirely
dark scaled; with a few basal bristles. Palpus moderately long, about 0.24-0.27
length of proboscis: 4-segmented; segment 4 moderate in size; segments 1-3 with
bristles; entirely dark scaled. Antenna slightly shorter than proboscis; torus with
conspicuous large patch of broad flat silver scales; flagellar segment 1 longer
than 2, usually slightly swollen, with small dark scales; flagellar segments 2-13
usually with 6 moderate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments 3-6
or 7 slightly longer than preceding segment, segments 6 or 7-12 subequal. Tho-
rax: Integument yellow to golden with light to dark brown areas. Acrostichal
bristles usually restricted to anterior promontory; dorsocentral bristles present
caudad to level of ppn bristles; prescutellar and supraalar bristles numerous and
56 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles present,
well developed; 1 parascutellar bristle present. Scutellum with 5-8 strong bristles
on midlobe, 3-7 on lateral lobe. Mesoscutum completely but sparsely covered
with narrow curved scales except for large anterior inner dorsocentral bare space
and median and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; background of small black scales
with a conspicuous pattern of slightly larger golden scales, as follows: (1) nar-
row acrostichal line from anterior promontory to prescutellar space, (2) entire
fossal area, (3) narrow posterior outer dorsocentral line from scutal suture to scu-
tellum, and (4) broad supraalar line from fossal area to parascutellum; lateral
prescutellar line of broad flat silver scales weakly developed. Midlobe of scutel-
lum with scales predominantly broad and flat, silver proximally, black distally;
lateral lobe with scales predominantly narrow and curved, black. Paratergite mod-
erately broad, bare. Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong
suture. Meron large. Pleuron with bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, pra, stp and upper
mep; stp bristles few, located above and below median stp scale patch; ssp, psp
and lower mep bristles absent. Integument of pleuron frequently slightly to con-
spicuously darkened around pleural scale patches. Apn with broad flat silver scales;
ppn with relatively small area of broad flat silver scales cephalad of mesotho-
racic spiracle; broad flat silver scales in patches on ppl, psp, ssp, stp below pra,
stp caudad of ssp area, stp cephalodorsad of midcoxa, and in 1 large or 2 small
separate patches on mep; pst, pcx, hypostigial area and metameron without scales.
Legs: Hindcoxa subequal in size to or smaller than midcoxa, its base far below
upper margin of meron. Legs moderately long, the forefemur about 1.26-1.32
times distance from top of thorax to tip of midcoxa. Forecoxa with light and
dark scales on outer surface; midcoxa and hindcoxa with light scales on outer
surface. Femora dark scaled with extensive areas of yellowish scales in basal por-
tion of anterior surface of forefemur and sometimes hindfemur, in basal portion
of posterior surface of midfemur and hindfemur and in long streak from base to
or near apex of posterior surface of forefemur. Knee spots small, silver; largest
on hindleg, sometimes absent on foreleg. Tibiae and tarsi dark scaled. Claws of
foreleg and midleg with acute submedian tooth, claws of hindleg simple. Wing:
Entirely dark scaled. Plume scales present on dorsum of veins Rs, R2+43, R2, R3,
M basad of furcation, and less conspicuously in apical portion of 1A. Haltere:
Scales predominantly yellowish, usually some blackish. Abdomen: Tergite I with
numerous scales middorsally. Laterotergite with large patch of silvery scales. Ter-
gites and sternites VI and VII completely scaled. Outstanding scales absent. Ter-
gites II-VII dark scaled with basolateral silver patch and sometimes with irregu-
lar indefinite yellowish basal band. Sternites extremely variable, proximal usually
largely or entirely yellowish, distal dark scaled with distinct basolateral silver or
yellowish-silver patch or indistinct basal yellowish area.
FEMALE GENITALIA (fig. 30). Segment VIIT. Tergite narrowed apically, length
along midline about 0.62-0.68 length of tergite VII; distal 0.64-0.74 with scales
and bristles. Sternite long, about 1.2 length of tergite, broader distally; distal mar-
gin broadly emarginate; all but narrow basal and lateral areas with scales or bris-
tles, the latter predominating; bristles more numerous along midline and distal
margin, largely weakly developed and short but some moderately developed and
elongate. Tergite IX: Deeply notched apically, maximum length about 0.57-0.67
of tergite VIII; moderately sclerotized; apical lobe with 11-17 relatively well
developed bristles. Jnsula: Moderately sclerotized; connected to sigma; with 3-6
pairs of moderately developed setae. Cercus: Moderately long, length of dorsal
Zavortink: New World Aedes 57
edge 0.70-0.75 of tergite VIII; compressed; apex rounded in lateral view; bris-
tles numerous apically, the largest moderately developed; scales absent. Postgen-
ital Plate: Moderately long and broad, length 0.45-0.55 of tergite VIII; index
about 1.8-2.2; apex rounded or subtruncate in ventral view; distal portion with num-
erous weakly developed bristles; basal median longitudinal apodeme strongly scle-
rotized. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized. Atrial plates not developed. Sigma: Contin-
uous with cowl; moderately sclerotized. Basal portion of spermathecal duct strong-
ly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized, more or less spherical, 1 no-
ticeably larger than others.
MALE (fig. 30). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head:
Proboscis relatively stout. Palpus subequal in length to proboscis; 5-segmented;
segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.67-0.71 length of palpus;
segment 4 short, 0.15-0.16 length of palpus; segment 5 short, 0.11-0.12 length
of palpus; palpus slender except for swollen apex of segment 3 and swollen seg-
ment 4; apex of segment 3 upturned, segments 4 and 5 drooping; apex of seg-
ment 3 and all of segments 4 and 5 with long bristles, these relatively few in
number; entirely dark scaled. Antenna slightly shorter than proboscis; torus much
enlarged, with large conspicuous patch of silver scales; flagellum strongly plumose,
segments 1-12 with very numerous long bristles; flagellar segment | slightly elon-
gate, with scales; flagellar segments 12 and 13 elongate, subequal in length or
penultimate longer, the 2 combined slightly shorter than total length of first 11
segments. Legs: Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw with
blunt submedian tooth, smaller claw with acute submedian tooth. Claws of hind-
leg small, simple. Abdomen: Apical segments and genitalia not conspicuously bent
ventrad. Tergites with more extensive yellow scaling basally.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 31). Several shades of tan and/or brown; paraproct
darkest; midportion of IX-T and most of sidepiece well pigmented; part of basal
mesal area of both tergal and sternal surfaces of sidepiece usually very weakly
pigmented. Segment VIII: Tergite long, 0.85-0.92 length of sternite; exserted, ap-
ical 0.52-0.58 scaled. Segment IX: Well developed; middorsal portion of tergite
moderately to strongly sclerotized, caudad of or at the level of base of side-
piece; tergite lobes prominent, broadly connected middorsally, each with 8-17
strongly developed setae in several series; sternite large, with 2-5 setae distally.
Sidepiece: Well developed, subcylindrical; mesal surface membranous from base
to apex; basal tergomesal area slightly to moderately swollen, with very numer-
ous short to moderately long fine setae and 1 moderately long and strong differ-
entiated seta that is gently curved apically; setae of basal tergomesal area separated
from remaining setae of tergal surface by long oblique bare area; apical lobe ab-
sent; median sternomesal sclerite and tuft absent; sternomesal surface without long
broad striated scales; dorsal, lateral and ventral surfaces with numerous scales and
bristles; numerous strong elongate setae in apical half of sternal surface mesally.
Claspette: Well developed; stem short, more or less straight in dorsal aspect; spic-
ulose; with 4-6 weakly developed setae; filament long, flattened apically, curved
dorsad, usually with slight ridge on convex side. Clasper: Simple, moderately
long, swollen subbasally, basal portion straight; median portion with longitudinal
ridges or wrinkles; basal portion spiculose; apical portion with 2 or 3 fine setae,
on both inner and outer surfaces; apical spiniform moderately long, 0.19-0.30
length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderately large, without teeth; base sub-
parallel-sided, apex bulbous. Proctiger: Strongly developed; not unusually long in
dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization vertical; paraproct well sclerotized, with
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
a single large heavily sclerotized apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 1-6.
PUPA (fig. 31). Abdomen: about 3.1 mm. Trumpet: 0.42 mm. Paddle: 0.74
mm. Cephalothorax: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair 5-C
moderately to strongly developed, short to moderately long, never reaching more
than 0.5 distance from its base to that of trumpet. Trumpet: Light to dark brown
basally, becoming amber distally. Broadening gradually from base to apex; trach-
eoid sculpturing relatively well developed in basal 0.13-0.18; reticulate sculptur-
ing strong. Abdomen: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter posteriorly. Tergites
II-VII without a strong transverse ridge anteriorly. Hair 1-II moderately to strongly
developed, usually 2-4b (2-8); hair 1-II] moderately to strongly developed, usu-
ally 2-4b (2-5); hait 1-IV-VII moderately to strongly developed, subequal on all
segments or 1-VI,VII smaller, usually single or double (1-3b). Hair 2-III-V dis-
tinctly laterad of hair 1 of corresponding segment. Hair 5-IV,V 0.4-0.7 length
of corresponding segment; 5-VII short to moderately long, single or double (1-
3b); stronger and shorter or longer than 4-VII. Hair 6-III-V subequally developed,
moderately long, usually fine; 6-VI longer and stronger than 6-III-V; hair 6-VII
usually shorter than 6-III-V. Hair 8-VI,VII ventral. Hair 9-III-VI relatively long
and stout, subequal on all segments or becoming longer on posterior segments
or subequal on III-V and elongate on VI, usually cephalad of the level of or in
line with hair 6 of corresponding segment; 9-VII far cephalad of caudolateral
angle of segment, with 1 or 2 (1-3) moderately long to long primary branches;
9-VIII at or slightly cephalad or cephalomesad of caudolateral angle of segment,
with 3-5 (3-7) long strong primary branches. Hair 10-VI usually relatively far
mesad of 11-VI. Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe moderately large, about
1.2-1.3 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length greater than width. Apex emargi-
nate or subtruncate. Midrib conspicuous to or nearly to apex; without wrinkled area
near apex. Without long marginal spicules. Hair 1-P short, usually single (single
or double).
LARVA (fig. 32). Head: 0.95 mm. Siphon: 0.71 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.29 mm.
Head: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lightened in ocular area, darkened pos-
teriorly. Labial plate distinctly narrowed anteriorly. Hair 1-C stout. Hairs 4,6-C
displaced caudad, not near labrum. Hair 4-C weakly to strongly developed, 2-6b;
mesad of or in line with 1-C and cephalad or caudad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C
single; more or less in line with 6-C. Hair 6-C single; distinctly laterad of 1-C.
Hair 7-C 3-6b (2-8). Hair 15-C moderately long, usually 2,3b (2-4). Mental plate
with 10 or 11 (10-12) teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Shaft smooth
or with a few minute spicules. Hair 1-A moderately long, single. Thorax: Epi-
dermis and fat body without conspicuous pigmentation. Integument with a dense
vestiture of simple spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5,6-P or 5-7-P sometimes united.
Hair 1-M,T moderately long, branched. Hairs 4,5-P branched; 5-M usually dou-
ble (1-3b). Hair 11-P,M,T much shorter than 9-P. Hair 13-I moderately to strong-
ly developed, usually 3-6b (3-8); usually larger than 14-M. Hair 14-M weakly to
strongly developed, usually 2,3b (1-5). Abdomen: Hair 1-1 moderately to strong-
ly developed, 3-5b; hair 1-IV,V moderately to strongly developed, 3-5b. Hair 2-
IlI-V usually in line with or slightly laterad of hair 1 of corresponding segment;
usually 3b (1-4). Hair 3-VII weakly to moderately developed, short, single. Hair
5-II-IV moderately to strongly developed, usually 3-5b (2-6). Hair 6-III-V usu-
ally 2,3b (2-4). Hair 9-III-V usually 2,3b (2-5). Hair 11-I moderately to strong-
ly developed, usually 5-7b (4-9). Hair 12-I usually absent. Hair 13-I moderately
to strongly developed, usually 3-6b (3-7); hair 13-IV,V strongly developed, usu-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 59
ally 3,4b (2-4); hair 13-VI moderately to strongly developed, 3-5b, laterad and
caudad of the level of 10-VI. Segment VIII: Hairs 1 and 2 separated. Hair | strong-
ly developed, usually 4,5b (3-7). Comb scales large; with long apical spine and
usually several very small basal spinules; few [5,6 (3-7)] in 1 row. Siphon: Weakly
to moderately pigmented. Relatively short, index usually 2.3-2.9 (2.2-3.1). Acus
large. Pecten teeth with 1 or more irregular basal denticles; 14-21 (13-25) in a
more or less straight even row. Hair 1-S slightly distad of pecten; moderately
to strongly developed, usually 2,3b (2-5). Anal Segment: Saddle large; without
spines on caudal margin; weakly to moderately pigmented. Hair 1-X moderately
to strongly developed, usually 3-5b. Hair 2-X usually 3-5b (2-7). Hair 3-X double
or single. Ventral brush (4-X) moderately developed; with 7 pairs of hairs; all
but most proximal 1 or 2 hairs from strongly sclerotized boss; hair 4a-X very
short, usually 9-12b (5-15); hairs 4b,4c-X usually 2,3b (1-4). Anal gills sausage-
shaped; dorsal curved ventrad, much longer than ventral and about 2.0-4.5 length
of anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes purpureipes is distinguished from the other Aedes in-
cluded in the present study as follows: in the adult by (1) the absence of post-
spiracular bristles, (2) the ornamentation of the mesoscutum, which has golden
longitudinal lines on a black background, and the combination of (3) the broad
flat scales on the vertex, midlobe of the scutellum and between the eyes, (4) the
bare paratergite, (5) the yellowish scales at the base of the femora and on the
sternites, and (6) the entirely dark scaled palpus, proboscis, tibiae and tarsi; in
the male genitalia by the combination of (1) the prominent IX tergite lobe
which bears 8-17 strongly developed setae in several series, (2) the slightly to
moderately swollen basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece which bears numerous
fine setae and 1 moderately long and strong differentiated seta, (3) the num-
erous strong elongate setae along the apical portion of the sternomesal surface
of the sidepiece, and (4) the apically expanded aedeagus; in the pupa by the
combination of (1) the position of hair 2-III-V, which is laterad of hair 1 of
the corresponding segment, (2) the short 5-IV,V, and (3) the long strong 9-III-
VI; and in the larva by (1) the spiculose integument of the thorax and abdo-
men, (2) the single row of 5 or 6 (3-7) large comb scales with a single long api-
cal spine and several small spinules, (3) the development of the ventral brush,
which arises from a strongly sclerotized boss, consists of 7 pairs of hairs, and
has hair 4a-X very short and 9-12b (5-15), and (4) the characteristic develop-
ment of the anal gills, with both the dorsal and ventral pairs sausage-shaped but
the dorsal pair much longer than the ventral and curved ventrad.
I am following Aitken (1941:81-82), Belkin and McDonald (1957:190) and
Mattingly (1961:38) in placing this very distinctive species in the monotypic sub-
genus Kompia, which shows no definite relationship to any other New World
group. Some larval features, such as the absence of hair 12-I, the form and po-
sition of 13-VI, the single 3-VII, and the boss at the base of the ventral brush,
suggest, however, that it may have been derived from the same stock as Abrae-
des, Aztecaedes, Gymnometopa and Howardina. Kompia is undoubtedly a relict
that has been preserved at the periphery of the Neotropical Region.
Aedes purpureipes is quite uniform in all stages throughout its range except
for the usually slightly weaker and more lightly pigmented hairs and spicules and
the stouter siphon of larvae from Baja California.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of purpureipes are found in treeholes. In south-
eastern Arizona this species is commonly associated with Ae. (Ochlerotatus) mont-
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
icola, Ae. (O.) muelleri and Ae. (Protomacleaya) burgeri at moderate elevations
(1500 to 1700 meters) in riparian woodland and oak-pine forest. It extends down
into hotter and drier regions than any of these species, however, and is apparently
the only treehole Aedes found in cottonwood trees (Populus) and hackberry trees
(Celtis) growing in some washes at lower elevations (1100 to 1220 meters) and
it is the only mosquito known to breed in rot cavities in palo verde trees (Cer-
cidium) growing on the desert pediments (900 meters). In southern Sonora pur-
pureipes is associated with Ae. (Protomacleaya) podographicus, a species of the
Terrens Group, at moderate elevations in the tropical deciduous (short tree) for-
est. Again, it is apparently the only Aedes utilizing treeholes at lower elevations
in this region, where it is found in cottonwood gallery forests to near sea level.
In the cape region of Baja California purpureipes is the only treehole Aedes that
has been collected in riverine and short tree forests at lower elevations; it has
not been found in the oak-pine forest at higher elevations.
Adults of purpureipes have been found resting in treeholes and have been col-
lected at artificial lights. Females have been taken in biting-landing collections with
human bait during the day and at dusk. They were annoying biters among the
palo verde trees along Mendoza Wash, Arizona, after the sun had set on 7 Sept
1969.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 29). Aedes purpureipes has been collected in southeastern
Arizona, northwestern Mexico and southern Baja California. In the northern por-
tion of its range it occurs at elevations between 900 and 1700 meters; in the
southern portion it has been collected at elevations between sea level and 1200
meters. Material examined: 3173 specimens; 390 males, 682 females, 1124 larvae,
977 pupae; 283 individual rearings (180 larval, 93 pupal, 10 incomplete).
MEXICO. Baja California Sur: El Pescadero, 1 June 1965, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 248), 3 IpM
(248-10,31,32), 5 IpF (248-11,12,30,33,34), 3 F, 1 M gen, 3 P, 5 L [UCLA]. El Triunfo, 25 Aug
1970, J.H. Arnell and L.T. Nielsen (HA-24-70), 3 lpF (1,4,5), 1 M, 2 P, 9 L [UTAH]. Miraflores,
8 July 1938, A.E. Michelbacher and E.S. Ross, 1 F [USNM]. Todos Santos, 31 May 1965,
W.A. McDonald (UCLA 243), 1 IpM (243-10) [UCLA]. Todos Santos, Rancho Santo Domingo,
2 June 1965, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 247), 6 IpM (247-10,11,13,31,33,39), 16 lpF (247-14-
16,18,19,30,32,34-38,40-43), 2 Ip (247-12,17), 59 M, 6 M gen, 56 F, 145 P, 45 L [UCLA];
26 Aug 1970, J.H. Arnell and L.T. Nielsen (HA-25-70), 11 M, 18 F, 91 P, 131 L [UTAH].
Sonora: Alamos (12 km SE), along Rio Cuchujaqui, 5 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T.
Nielsen (MEX 643), 3 IpM (643-10,13,15), 3 IpF (643-11,12,14), 3 M, 2 F, 5 P, 12 L; same
data (MEX 648), 1 IpF (648-11), 2 M, 1 F, 3 P, 109 L [UCLA]. Alamos (12.4 km W), 5 June
1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 644), 2 IpF (644-10,11); same data (MEX 645),
2 IpM (645-11,12), 4 IpF (645-10,13-15), 13 M, 7 F, 21 P, 20 L; same data (MEX 646), 3 IpM
(646-12,14,17), 3 IpF (646-11,13,15), 2 M, 3 P, 8 L [UCLA]. Nogales (14.4 km S), 22 Aug
1970, J.H. Arnell and L.T. Nielsen (HA-20-70), 33 P, 14 L [UTAH].
UNITED STATES. Arizona: Alambre Wash, Baboquivari Mts., Pima Co., 7 Sept 1969, T-.J.
Zavortink (UCLA 628), 6 IpF (628-10-15), 1 pM (628-100), 5 pF (628-101-105), 2 F, 2P,13L
[UCLA] . Baboquivari Canyon, Baboquivari Mts., Pima Co., 31 Dec 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA
558), 2 IpM (558-30,31), 1 IpF (558-33), 1 L; same data (UCLA 566), 26 L [UCLA]. Carr
Canyon, Huachuca Mts., Cochise Co., 5 Sept 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 341), 1 IpF (341-11)
[UCLA]. Cochise Stronghold Recreation Area, Dragoon Mts., Cochise Co., 26 Aug 1964, J.F.
Burger (UCLA 256), 1 F; 4 Sept 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 326), 1 IpF (326-19), 2 M, 4 F,
1 M gen, 7 P; same data (UCLA 330), 4 IpF (330-12-14,16), 1 Ip (830-11); 22 Mar 1966, T.J.
Zavortink (UCLA 426), 1 pF (426-10); same data (UCLA 427), 1 M, 1 P, 1 L [UCLA]. Gardner
Canyon, Santa Rita Mts., Pima Co., 24 Aug 1954, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 136), 1 P, 5 L
[UCLA]. Lochiel (13 km E), Bodie Canyon, Santa Cruz Co., 27 Dec 1969, L.T. Nielsen and
T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 549), 4 L; same data (UCLA 559), 1 IpF (559-30), 2 M, 3 P, 2 L; same
Zavortink: New World Aedes 61
data (UCLA 562), 2 IpF (562-40,61), 1 F, 4 P, 13 L [UCLA]. Madera Canyon, Santa Rita
Mts., Santa Cruz Co., 22 Aug 1954, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 135), 5 pF (135-206-208,212,214),
5 P, 20 L; 17,19 Aug 1955, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 171), 3 IpM (171-153,165,187), 60 IpF
(171-103, 108-112,115,117-119, 130-137, 146-148, 150-152, 154-159, 161, 166-171, 184, 186, 192-
206 ,214,234-236,238,239), 13 pM (171-121-123,126,127,129,140,160,162,177,179,182,208), 40
pF (171-124,125,142,163,164,172-176,178,180,181,183,188-191,209-211,215-232,237), 1 IM
(171-116), 5 lp (171-106,139,185,213,240), 191 M, 328 F, 13 M gen, 255 P, 53 L; 30 June
1956, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 206), 1 lpM (206-101) [UCLA]. Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Mts.,
Pima Co., 28 Dec 1969, L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 550), 1 pM (550-35), 1 P, 6 L; 29 Dec 1969,
T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 552), 1 M; same data (UCLA 555), 1 IpM (555-30),
3 IpF (555-32,34,35), 1 F, 10 P, 8 L; same data (UCLA 556), 3 P, 26 L; same data (UCLA
561), 1 IpM (561-36), 4 IpF (561-34,35,37,38), 2 P, 6 L; 30 Dec 1969, T.J. Zavortink and
L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 553), 4 L; 24 Sept 1970, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 576), 7 L [UCLA]. Mendoza
Wash, Coyote Mts., Pima Co., 7 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 629), 1 IpM (629-11), 7 IpF
(629-10,12-17), 7 pM (629-100-104,106,107), 3 pF (629-105,108,109), 1 M, 11 F, 12 P, 14 L;
24 Sept 1970, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 582), 6 L [UCLA]. Nogales (21 km NW), Calabasas Picnic
Ground, Santa Cruz Co., 21 Mar 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 429), 2 M, 3 F,5 P,6 L [UCLA].
Patagonia (3-6 km WSW), Santa Cruz Co., 24 Aug 1954, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 139), 2 L;
19 Aug 1955, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 174), 1 IpM (174-116), 5 IpF (174-108,120-123), 7 pM
(174-101,106,107,111,112,117,118), 9 pF (174-102-104,109,110,113-115,119), 5 M gen, 1 P;
13 Sept 1968, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 453), 1 pM (453-100); same data (UCLA 454), 2 IpF
(454-10,11) [UCLA]. Sabino Canyon, Baboquivari Mts., Pima Co., 30 Dec 1969, T.J. Zavortink
(UCLA 560), 1 L [UCLA]. Sierra Vista (15 km E), Cochise Co., 22 Mar 1966, T.J. Zavortink
(UCLA 428), 26 M, 1 M gen, 26 F, 53 P, 27 L [UCLA]. Sycamore Canyon, Baboquivari Mts.,
Pima Co., 31 Dec 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 557), 3 IpM (557-11,12,19), 4 IpF (557-13,
20-22), 1 lp (557-23), 1M, 1 F, 6 P, 69 L; same data (UCLA 563), 1 IpM (563-30), 2 L; same data
(UCLA 564), 2 IpF (564-20,21), 1 F, 2 P, 13 L; same data (UCLA 565), 2 IpM (565-20,22),
6 IlpF (565-21,23-27), 7 M, 6 F, 16 P, 246 L [UCLA].
Additional Record From the Literature
MEXICO. Sinaloa: Esperanza Camp, San Blas (Vargas, 1949:261).
Subgenus ABRAEDES Zavortink
1970. Abraedes Zavortink, 1970:2-3. TYPE SPECIES: Aedes (Abraedes) papago Zavortink,
1970, United States of America; monobasic and original designation.
13. Aedes (Abraedes) papago Zavortink
Figs. 29,33,34
1970. Aedes (Abraedes) papago Zavortink, 1970:3-8. TYPE: Holotype male (UCLA 550-39)
with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia, Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Moun-
tains, Pima Co., Arizona, United States of America, egg from treehole, 28 Dec 1969,
L.T. Nielsen [USNM].
FEMALE. Wing: 3.15 mm. Proboscis: 2.06 mm. Forefemur: 1.65 mm. Abdo-
men: about 3.2 mm. Dark scales of head, proboscis, palpus and legs, and dark
and silvery scales of abdomen with metallic silver, copper, green, blue or violet
reflections. Head: Eyes broadly separated above antennae, the resulting space with
broad flat silver scales. Integument dark brown to black. Frontal bristles absent.
Orbital bristles moderately numerous, mesal 6 or 7 pairs strongly developed, lat-
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
eral 4-6 pairs moderately developed. Vertex with few black erect scales and num-
erous broad flat predominantly black scales; silver-white scales in broad median
longitudinal line, usually some whitish scales posteriorly near occiput. Occiput
with numerous entirely or predominantly black erect scales and few white narrow
curved scales. Orbital line of broad flat silver scales developed. Dorsolateral scales
broad and flat, white mesally, black laterally. Lateral and ventral surfaces with
broad flat black and white or silver-white scales. Clypeus moderately large, bare.
Proboscis moderately ‘stout, much longer than forefemur; dark scaled with scat-
tered white scales in at least middle portion, especially dorsally; with a few basal
bristles. Palpus moderately long, about 0.26-0.29 length of proboscis; 4-segmented,
segment 4 moderate in size; segments 1-3 with bristles; dark scaled with white
scales in patch at apex, in patch at base of segment 3 and scattered or in patch
on segment 2. Antenna subequal in length to proboscis; torus with conspicuous
large patch of broad flat silver scales; flagellar segment 1 longer than 2, slightly
swollen, with line of white scales; flagellar segments 2-13 usually with 6 mod-
erate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments 3-7 or 8 slightly longer
than preceding segment, segments 7 or 8-12 subequal in length. Thorax: Integu-
ment dark brown to black. Acrostichal and dorsocentral bristles in long rows;
prescutellar and supraalar bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral
prescutal and posterior fossal bristles present, well developed; 1 parascutellar bris-
tle present. Scutellum with 4-6 strong bristles on midlobe, 3-7 on lateral lobe.
Mesoscutum completely covered with predominantly small narrow curved scales
except for anterior inner dorsocentral and median and lateral prescutellar bare
spaces; dark brown or black with conspicuous pattern of white or silvery patches
or lines, as follows: (1) median patch on anterior promontory, (2) para-acros-
tichal line from anterior promontory to near level of wing root that narrows and
converges with its mate posteriorly, (3) median posterior acrostichal line, (4) lat-
eral prescutal line, (5) posterior fossal line, (6) posterior outer dorsocentral line,
(7) irregular patch above mesothoracic spiracle, (8) transverse supraalar patch, and
(9) sometimes in lateral prescutellar line or anterior prescutellar patch. Scutellar
lobes with broad flat silver scales. Paratergite moderately broad, with broad flat
silver scales in lower anterior portion. Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from meso-
scutum by strong suture. Meron large. Pleural bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra,
stp and upper mep; stp bristles few, located between upper and lower scale patches;
ssp and lower mep bristles absent. Apn with line of broad flat silver scales; ppn
with small patch of broad flat silver scales in lower portion near ssp and some-
times with a large sparse oblique patch of silver and black scales; broad flat sil-
ver scales in patches on upper and lower pst, ppl, pcx, ssp, pra, in 2 parallel
lines across middle stp, on stp cephalodorsad of midcoxa, and on upper and low-
er mep; hypostigial area, psp and metameron usually without scales. Legs: Hind-
coxa smaller than or subequal in size to midcoxa, its base far below upper mar-
gin of meron. Legs short, forefemur about 1.03-1.10 times distance from top of
thorax to apex of midcoxa. Forecoxa with silver and black scales; midcoxa and
hindcoxa with silver scales. Femora black scaled with white scales in incomplete
narrow subbasal oblique band on forefemur, in usually complete narrow subbasal
oblique ring on midfemur and hindfemur and scattered, the scattered scales es-
pecially numerous on forefemur. Knee spots small, silver, usually incomplete on
forefemur. Tibiae black scaled with white scales in narrow to moderately broad
dorsally incomplete basal band, narrow ring or band about 0.25-0.33 distance from
base of foretibia and midtibia and broad submedian ring on hindtibia. Tarsi black
Zavortink: New World Aedes 63
scaled with white scales as follows: in moderately broad basal patch, band or
ring on segment | and small basal patch on segment 2 and sometimes segment
3 of foretarsus and midtarsus; in moderately broad subbasal band or ring on seg-
ment 1, moderately broad basal band or ring on segments 2 and 3 and moderately
broad basal patch or band on segments 4 and 5 of hindleg. Claws of all legs sim-
ple. Wing: Dark scaled except for white line in basal 0.16-0.20 of anterior sur-
face of costa. Plume scales on dorsum of veins Rs, R43, R2, R3, middle 0.60-
0.70 of M and sometimes apical portion of 1A. Haltere: Scales white and dark.
Abdomen: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally. Laterotergite with large
patch of silver-white scales. Tergites VI and VII with large bristly submedian api-
cal scaleless area. Outstanding scales present. Tergites II-VII predominantly black
scaled, with lateral basal or subbasal silver patch; scales of silver patches and
black scales distad of them becoming progressively denser and outstanding on dis-
tal segments; tergites VI and VII with additional outstanding black scales mid-
dorsally. Sternites variably scaled; proximal sternites sometimes largely bare, usu-
ally with at least a few dark scales apically, sometimes with small lateral sub-
basal or median silver patch; distal sternites usually at least partly bare basally,
black scaled apically and with lateral median or preapical silver patch or band;
scales becoming progressively denser and more outstanding on distal segments.
FEMALE GENITALIA. Segment VIII: Tergite narrowed apically, length along
midline about 0.67 of tergite VII; distal 0.60-0.70 with scales and bristles. Ster-
nite long, about 1.5 length of tergite, broader distally; distal margin nearly straight;
all but narrow basal and lateral areas with scales or bristles, the latter predom-
inating; bristles more numerous along midline and distal margin, largely weakly
developed and short but some moderately developed and elongate. Tergite IX:
Deeply notched apically; maximum length apparently about 0.45 of tergite VIII;
moderately sclerotized; apical lobe with 1 fine bristle. Insula: Weakly sclerotized;
possibly not connected to sigma; with 3 pairs of moderately developed setae.
Cercus: Moderately long, length of dorsal edge about 0.83 of tergite VIII; com-
pressed; apex rounded in lateral view; bristles numerous apically, the largest mod-
erately long; scales present. Postgenital Plate: Moderately long and broad, length
about 0.58 of tergite VIII; index about 1.6; apex rounded in ventral view; distal
portion with numerous weakly developed bristles; basal median longitudinal apo-
deme strongly sclerotized. Cowl: Moderately to strongly sclerotized. Atrial plates
not developed. Sigma: Possibly not continuous with cowl; very weakly sclerotized.
Basal portion of spermathecal duct strongly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly
sclerotized, more or less spherical, 1 noticeably larger than others.
MALE. Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head: Proboscis
moderately stout; white speckling reduced or absent. Palpus subequal to probos-
cis in length; 5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.67
length of palpus; segment 4 short, 0.16 length of palpus; segment 5 short, 0.12
length of palpus; palpus slender except for swollen apex of segment 3 and swol-
len segment 4; apex of segment 3 upturned, segments 4 and 5 slightly drooping;
apex of segment 3 and all of segments 4 and 5 with relatively few bristles; dark
scaled with large subbasal white patch or band on segment 2 and moderately
broad basal white patch or band on segments 3-5. Antenna shorter than probos-
cis; torus much enlarged, with conspicuous patch of broad flat silver scales; fla-
gellum strongly plumose, segments 1-12 with very numerous long bristles; flagel-
lar segment 1 slightly elongate, with scales; flagellar segments 12 and 13 elon-
gate, penultimate longer, the 2 combined shorter than total length of first 11
64 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
segments. Legs: Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw with
blunt submedian tooth, smaller claw simple. Claws of hindleg small, simple. Ab-
domen: Apical segments and genitalia conspicuously bent ventrad.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 33). Unusually colored; segment IX, proctiger, phal-
losome, claspette and clasper largely weakly pigmented, yellowish; sidepiece and
spiniform moderately pigmented, light brown; apex of paraproct deeply pigmented,
blackish. Segment VIII: Tergite short, 0.70-0.78 length of sternite; largely retract-
ed, only apical 0.21 scaled. Segment IX: Poorly developed dorsally, the tergite
short; middorsal portion of tergite moderately sclerotized, cephalad of level of
base of sidepiece; tergite without lobes but with 1 or 2 fine submedian setae on
each side; sternite large, with 8 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, fusiform;
mesal surface membranous from base to apex; basal tergomesal area not swollen,
without clumped or enlarged setae, but with normal bristles of dorsal surface of
sidepiece slightly shorter and more numerous; apical lobe not developed; median
sternomesal sclerite and tuft absent; sternomesal surface without long broad stri-
ated scales; dorsomesal surface with short setae, remainder of dorsal surface and
lateral and ventral surfaces with numerous scales and long bristles; bristles of ven-
tral surface not specialized. Claspette: Well developed; stem short, bent mesad
distally, spiculose, with 3-6 weakly developed setae; filament long, subterete, curved
dorsad, without ridge or retrorse barb on convex side. Clasper: Simple, moderately
long, broadest at base, basal portion straight; without conspicuous ridges or wrin-
kles; basal portion spiculose; apical portion with 2 setae on ventral surface; apical
spiniform moderately long, 0.30-0.35 length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus mod-
erately large, without teeth; base subparallel-sided, apex bulbous. Proctiger: Strong-
ly developed; unusually long in dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization largely
horizontal; paraproct well sclerotized, with a single large heavily sclerotized apical
tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 2-4.
PUPA (fig. 33). Abdomen: about 4.0 mm. Trumpet: 0.54 mm. Paddle: 0.81
mm. Integument uniformly weakly pigmented, light straw yellow. Cephalothorax:
Hair 5-C weakly developed, short, reaching 0.3-0.4 distance from its base to base
of trumpet. Trumpet: Brown basally, bright yellow apically. Broadening gradu-
ally from base to apex; tracheoid sculpturing developed in basal 0.08; reticulate
sculpturing strong. Abdomen: Tergites II-V usually without a strong transverse
ridge anteriorly; tergites VI and VII usually with moderately strong transverse
ridge near level of hair 0. Hair 1-II-VII usually weakly developed, single or dou-
ble (1-3b). Hair 2-III-V mesad of hair 1 of corresponding segment. Hair 5-IV,V
0.8-1.0 length of corresponding segment; 5-VII short. to moderately long, dou-
ble or single, longer and stronger than 4-VII. Hair 6-III-V subequally developed,
short, fine; 6-VI longer and stronger than 6-III-V; hair 6-VII shorter than 6-VI,
but usually slightly longer and stronger than 6-III-V. Hair 8-VI,VII ventral. Hair
9-III-VI relatively long and stout, becoming longer on posterior segments; usu-
ally cephalad of level of hair 6 of corresponding segment on III and IV, ceph-
alad or caudad of level of hair 6 on V, caudad of level of hair 6 on VI; hair
9-VII mesad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 1 or 2 long primary branches;
9-VIII relatively far mesad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 2-5 long strong
primary branches. Hair 10-VI relatively far mesad of 11-VI. Terminal Segments:
Male genital lobe moderately large, about 1.3 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length
greater than width. Apex deeply emarginate. Midrib conspicuous to wrinkled area
basad of apical emargination. Long filamentous marginal spicules developed. Hair
1-P moderately long, single.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 65
LARVA (fig. 34). Head: 0.97 mm. Siphon: 0.72 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.28 mm.
Head: Weakly pigmented, largely medium straw-yellow. Labial plate subquadrate.
Hair 1-C stout. Hairs 4,6-C relatively close to labrum. Hair 4-C weakly to mod-
erately developed, 4-9b; mesad of 1-C and cephalad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C
single, laterad of 6-C. Hair 6-C single, in line with or laterad of 1-C. Hair 7-C
2,3b (1-3). Hair 15-C long, 3,4b. Mental plate with 8-10 teeth on each side of
median tooth. Antenna: Shaft without spicules but sometimes with annular wrin-
kles. Hair 1-A short, usually single (single or double). Thorax: Epidermis and fat
body without conspicuous pigmentation. Integument without spicules. Hairs 5-7-P
arising from separate tubercles. Hair 1-M,T moderately long, usually branched.
Hairs 4,5-P branched; 5-M single or double. Hair 11-P,M,T much shorter than
9-P. Hair 13-T moderately developed, 2-4b; subequal to or larger than 14-M. Hair
14-M weakly to moderately developed, 1-3b. Abdomen: Hair 1-I moderately de-
veloped, usually 3,4b (3-7); hair 1-IV,V moderately to strongly developed, 3,4b.
Hair 2-III-V usually distinctly mesad of hair 1 of the corresponding segment; us-
ually single or double (1-3b). Hair 3-VII moderately developed, short, single. Hair
5-II-IV moderately to strongly developed, 3-5b. Hair 6-III-V double. Hair 9-III-V
single or double. Hair 11-I moderately developed, usually 4-7b (3-8). Hair 12-I
absent. Hair 13-I weakly to moderately developed, usually 3,4b (1-4); hair 13-
IV,V strongly developed, 2-4b; hair 13-VI moderately to strongly developed, 2-
4b, laterad and usually caudad of the level of 10-VI. Segment VIII: Hairs | and
2 separated. Hair 1 moderately to strongly developed, usually 4,5b (3-5). Comb
scales large; with 1 or 2 long spines and several shorter spines; few (4 or 5) in
1 row. Siphon: Moderately pigmented, largely light yellow-brown to light brown.
Relatively short; index about 1.9-2.3. Acus absent. Pecten teeth with 2-4 irreg-
ular basal denticles; 12-14 (12-18) in a more or less straight even row. Hair 1-S
slightly distad of pecten; moderately developed, 2,3b. Anal Segment: Saddle mod-
erately large; without spines on caudal margin; moderately pigmented, light yel-
low-brown to light brown. Hair 1-X strongly developed, usually 2,3b (1-4). Hair
2-X usually 3,4b (3-7). Hair 3-X single. Ventral brush (4-X) weakly developed;
with 5 pairs of hairs; all hairs or all but most proximal 1 or 2 hairs from weakly
sclerotized boss; hair 4a-X short, usually 4,5b (4-6); hairs 4b,4c-X single or dou-
ble. Anal gills sausage-shaped; dorsal and ventral subequal in length, 3.0-4.2 of
anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes papago is one of the most distinctive New World Aedes
and is easily separated from all other container-breeding species as follows: in
the adult by (1) the ornamentation of the mesoscutum, which has narrow white
and silver lines and patches in a pattern superficially similar to that of Aedes
aegypti, (2) the presence of 2 narrow diagonal lines of silver scales across the
middle portion of the sternopleuron, (3) the ornamentation of the femora, which
have white scales in a narrow, diagonal, subbasal band, (4) the pair of large,
bristly, submedian, apical, scaleless areas on tergites VI and VII, and the com-
bination of (5) the broad flat scales on the vertex, paratergite, all 3 scutellar
lobes and between the eyes, (6) the white band 0.25-0.50 the distance from the
base on all tibiae, (7) the subbasal white band of hindtarsal segment 1, and (8)
the simple claws of the female; in the male genitalia by (1) the yellowish color
of segment IX and the proctiger, phallosome, claspette and clasper, (2) the fusi-
form sidepiece without any indication of a basal or apical lobe, (3) the apically
bulbous aedeagus, and (4) the long paraproct with a nearly horizontal basolateral
sclerotization; in the pupa by (1) the long, filamentous, marginal spicules of the
66 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
paddle, and the combination of (2) the uniform light straw-yellow pigmentation,
(3) the position of hair 2-III-V, which is mesad of hair 1 of the corresponding
segment, and (4) the long strong 9-III-VI; and in the larva by (1) the single row
of 4 or 5 large comb scales with 1 or 2 long and several shorter spines, (2) the
development of the ventral brush, which arises from a weakly sclerotized boss,
consists of 5 pairs of hairs, and has 4a-X short and 4-6b, and the combination
of (3) the subquadrate labial plate, (4) the absence of 12-I, (5) the position
of 2-III-V, which is usually mesad of hair 1 of the corresponding segment, (6)
the short single 3-VII, (7) the absence of an acus on the siphon, and (8) the
4 long, subequal, sausage-shaped gills.
Aedes papago is so different from any other New World Aedes that it undoubt-
edly deserves to be placed in the monotypic subgenus Abraedes. The definite
relationships of Abraedes are unknown, but some larval features suggest that it
may be remotely related to Aztecaedes, Gymnometopa, Howardina and Kompia.
The pleural ornamentation and simple claws of the female are reminiscent of
Howardina. The nearly horizontal basolateral sclerotization of the paraproct in
the male genitalia is found elsewhere in the New World Aedini only in Haema-
gogus. The chaetotaxy of the larva is most similar to that of Kompia. Abraedes
is a relict that has been preserved at the periphery of the Neotropics or, possibly,
in a highly specialized habitat (see below).
BIONOMICS. The small series of reared specimens of papago was obtained from
eggs collected in a rothole in an oak tree (Quercus sp.). Associated species were
Ae. (Kompia) purpureipes and Ae. (Protomacleaya) burgeri. Females have been
taken attacking humans; John Burger (in litt.) caught 3 that were attempting to
bite him in bright sunlight between the hours of 0930 and 1100 on 20 August
1970 at an elevation near 900 meters in the desert several kilometers southeast
of Sahuarita, Pima Co., Arizona. This collection is of particular significance be-
cause it indicates that papago is a denizen of the lower Sonoran desert and that
the normal habitat of the immature stages remains to be discovered.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 29). Aedes papago has been found at elevations between
900 and 1100 meters in Pima County, Arizona. Material examined: 16 specimens;
2 males, 4 females, 5 larvae, 5 pupae; 5 individual larval rearings.
UNITED STATES. Avizona: Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Mts., Pima Co., 13 Aug 1968, M.L.
Noller, 1 F [ARIZ]; 28 Dec 1969, L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 550), holotype lpM and gen (550-
39), allotype 1pF (550-33) [USNM], 1 IpM and gen (550-36), 2 IpF (550-37,38) [UCLA].
Additional Record
UNITED STATES. Arizona: Sahuarita (19 km SE), Pima Co., 20 Aug 1970, J.F. Burger,
3 F (J.F. Burger, in litt.).
AZTECAEDES, new subgenus
TYPE SPECIES: Aedes (Gualter.a) ramirezi Vargas & Downs, 1950.
DIAGNOSIS. Aztecaedes may be distinguished from all other New World sub-
genera of Aedes as follows: in the adult by (1) the ornamentation of the meso-
scutum, which has small, broad flat white scales in a narrow median acrostichal
line that is continued as a median prescutellar line through the prescutellar space
to the scutellum, a narrow posterior outer dorsocentral line, and a narrow, com-
plete lateral marginal line, (2) the ornamentation of the pleuron, which has 2
Zavortink: New World Aedes 67
nearly horizontal lines of white scales in the upper portion, (3) the scaling of
the scutellum, the midlobe having a median longitudinal line of broad flat white
scales bordered by dark narrow curved scales and the lateral lobe having dark
narrow curved scales, and the combination of (4) the presence of numerous erect
scales and few to numerous moderately broad flat scales on the vertex, (5) the
absence of humeral and lateral prescutal bristles, (6) the bare paratergite, (7) the
restricted scaling of the posterior pronotum, which has narrow curved dark scales
along the upper edge and broad flat white scales in a line across the lower por-
tion, (8) the presence of hypostigial scales, and (9) the entirely dark scaled pro-
boscis, palpus, tibiae and tarsi; in the male genitalia by (1) the pair of very strong-
ly developed setae arising from the dorsal surface of the distal portion of the
claspette stem, and by the combination of (2) the long subcylindrical aedeagus
with a median constriction, (3) the numerous long strong setae on the sterno-
mesal surface of the sidepiece, and (4) the absence of a tuft of setae or a single
long, strongly differentiated seta at the base of the tergomesal surface of the
sidepiece; in the pupa by (1) the long, strong, irregular transverse ridge slightly
caudad of the level of hair 0 on tergites II-VI or VII, (2) the broad paddle with
the midrib conspicuous in only the basal portion, and (3) the fine but elongate
9-III-VI; and in the larva by (1) the very large ocular‘lobe of the head, (2) the
single hair 7-C, (3) the strongly developed and few branched 13-T,I and 14-M,
(4) the very short siphon, (5) the short pecten that is conspicuously curved dor-
sad distally or oblique, (6) the numerous basal denticles or serrations of the pec-
ten teeth, (7) the long, strong single 1-X, (8) the development of the ventral
brush, which arises from a strongly sclerotized boss, usually consists of 8 pairs
of hairs, and has 4a-X very short, fine and usually single, and (9) the large to
very large inflated, tapering anal gills.
DISCUSSION. See ramirezi below.
14. Aedes (Aztecaedes) ramirezi Vargas & Downs
Figs. 29,35-37
1950. Aedes (Gualteria) ramirezi Vargas and Downs, 1950:164-167. TYPE: Holotype female,
Gabriel Mariaca, Morelos, Mexico, larva from rockhole, 29 June 1947, W.G. Downs
[ISET].
Aedes (Finlaya) ramirezi of Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:170).
FEMALE (fig. 35). Wing: 4.35 mm. Proboscis: 3.24 mm. Forefemur: 2.75 mm.
Abdomen: about 4.2 mm. Dark scales of palpus, proboscis, legs and abdomen
with green, blue or violet reflections. Head: Eyes narrowly separated above an-
tennae, the resulting space with moderately broad white scales. Integument dark
brown to black. Frontal bristles present, weakly to strongly developed, 1 or 2
pairs. Orbital bristles moderately numerous, mesal 5-9 pairs strongly developed,
lateral 3-5 pairs moderately developed. Vertex with numerous black erect scales
and few to numerous moderately broad flat scales that are entirely or predom-
inantly black, some along midline sometimes white. Occiput with numerous black
erect scales and relatively few narrow curved scales that are small and black and
white laterally, enlarged and white along midline. Orbital line of moderately broad
flat white scales present. Dorsolateral scales broad flat, white mesally, black later-
68 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
ally. Lateral and ventral surfaces with broad flat whitish scales. Clypeus large,
bare. Proboscis relatively stout, longer than forefemur; entirely dark scaled; with
a few basal bristles. Palpus short, about 0.18-0.21 length of proboscis; 4-segment-
ed, segment 4 moderately long; segments 1-3 with bristles; entirely dark scaled.
Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus with conspicuous large patch of broad flat
silver-white scales; flagellar segment 1 longer than 2, slightly swollen, with small
dark and sometimes whitish scales; flagellar segments 2-13 usually with 6 mod-
erate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments 3-5 or 6 slightly longer
than preceding segment, segments 4, 5 or 6-12 subequal in length. Thorax: Inte-
gument dark brown to black. Acrostichal bristles restricted to anterior promon-
tory or extending caudad in long row; dorsocentral bristles in well developed com-
plete row; prescutellar and supraalar bristles numerous and well developed; hu-
meral and lateral prescutal bristles absent; posterior fossal bristles present, well
developed; 1 parascutellar bristle present. Scutellum with 4-6 strong bristles on
midlobe, 6-9 on lateral lobe. Mesoscutum completely covered with scales except
for anterior inner dorsocentral and submedian and lateral prescutellar bare spaces;
background of small narrow curved black scales with broader flatter white scales
in conspicuous narrow longitudinal lines, as follows: (1) acrostichal line from an-
terior promontory through prescutellar space to scutellum, (2) posterior outer
dorsocentral line from scutal suture to scutellum, and (3) lateral marginal line
from anterior promontory to parascutellum. Midlobe of scutellum with broad flat
white scales in median longitudinal line and narrow curved black scales laterally;
lateral lobe with narrow curved black scales. Paratergite moderately broad, bare.
Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong suture. Meron large.
Pleuron with bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra, stp and upper mep; stp bristles
few, located above and below median stp scale patch; ssp and lower mep bristles
absent. Apn with line of broad flat white scales; ppn with narrow curved black
scales along upper edge and broad flat white scales in linear patch below level
of mesothoracic spiracle; broad flat white scales in patches on ppl, hypostigial
area, psp, ssp, stp below pra, stp caudad of ssp area, stp cephalodorsad of mid-
coxa, and in 1 large oblique patch or rarely 2 small patches in upper half of
mep; pst, pcx and usually metameron bare. Legs: Hindcoxa smaller than or sub-
equal in size to midcoxa, its base far below upper margin of meron. Legs long,
forefemur about 1.40-1.48 distance from top of thorax to apex of midcoxa. Fore-
coxa with light and dark scales; midcoxa and hindcoxa with light scales. Femora
dark scaled with white scales in streak in basal portion of lower anterior surface
of forefemur, basal portion of anterior surface of hindfemur and rarely midfemur,
basal portion of posterior surface of midfemur and hindfemur and in long streak
from base to or near apex of posterior surface of forefemur. Knee spots mod-
erate in size, white, largest on hindleg. Tibiae and tarsi entirely dark scaled. Claws
of foreleg and midleg with acute submedian tooth, claws of hindleg simple. Wing:
Entirely dark scaled. Plume scales present on dorsum of veins Rs, R243, R2, R3,
M basad of furcation and apical portion of 1A. Haltere: Scales white and black.
Abdomen: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally. Laterotergite with large
patch of white scales. Segments VI and VII completely scaled. Outstanding scales
absent. Tergites and sternites II-VII dark scaled with basolateral silver-white patch,
patches of sternites usually larger.
FEMALE GENITALIA (fig. 35). Segment VII: Tergite much narrowed apical-
ly; length along midline about 0.54-0.61 of tergite VII; distal 0.63-0.71 with scales
and bristles. Sternite long, about 1.3-1.4 length of tergite, broadened distally; dis-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 69
tal margin broadly emarginate; all but narrow basal and lateral areas with scales
and bristles, the latter predominating; bristles more numerous along midline and
distal margin, largely weakly developed and short but some moderately developed
and elongate. Tergite IX: Deeply notched apically, maximum length about 0.64-
0.73 of tergite VIII; moderately sclerotized; apical lobe with 9-12 setae. Insula:
Rather strongly sclerotized; with 5-9 pairs of moderately developed setae. Cer-
cus: Moderately long, dorsal length about 0.80-0.90 length of tergite VIII; com-
pressed; apex pointed in lateral view; bristles numerous apically, the largest mod-
erately developed; without scales. Postgenital Plate: Moderately long and broad,
0.60-0.62 length of tergite VIII; index about 1.7-1.8; apex shallowly emarginate
in ventral view; distal portion with numerous weakly developed bristles; basal med-
ian longitudinal apodeme strongly sclerotized. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized. Atrial
plates not developed. Sigma: Not sclerotized. Basal portion of spermathecal duct
moderately sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized, more or less spher-
ical, 1 slightly larger than others.
MALE (fig. 35). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head:
Proboscis relatively stout. Palpus subequal in length to or longer than proboscis;
5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.56-0.58 length
of palpus; segment 4 moderately long, 0.19-0.20 length of palpus; segment 5 mod-
erately long, 0.17-0.18 length of palpus; palpus slender except for swollen apex
of segment 3 and swollen segment 4; apex of segment 3 upturned, segments 4
and 5 drooping slightly; apex of segment 3 and all of segment 4 with moder-
ately numerous long bristles, all of segment 5 with shorter bristles; entirely dark
scaled. Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus much enlarged, with large conspic-
uous patch of white scales; flagellum strongly plumose, segments 1-12 with very
numerous long bristles; flagellar segment 1 slightly elongate, with scales; flagel-
lar segments 12 and 13 elongate, subequal in length, the 2 combined subequal
to total length of first 11 segments. Legs: Light scaling of femora less extensive
than in female. Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw with
blunt submedian tooth and acute basal external tooth, smaller claw with acute
submedian tooth. Claws of hindleg small, simple. Abdomen: Apical segments and
genitalia not conspicuously bent ventrad. Light scaling less extensive than in female.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 36). Various shades of brown or tan, [X-T lobe and
proctiger darkest, clasper lightest; basal sternomesal area of sidepiece with con-
spicuous nonpigmented area. Segment VIII: Tergite long, 0.83-0.90 length of ster-
nite; exserted, apical 0.50-0.54 scaled. Segment IX: Well developed; middorsal por-
tion of tergite moderately to strongly sclerotized, caudad of or at the level of
base of sidepiece; tergite lobes prominent, very broadly connected middorsally,
each with 4-9 strongly developed setae in a single or partially double series; ster-
nite large, with 4-9 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, subcylindrical; mesal
surface membranous from base to apex; basal tergomesal area slightly to mod-
erately swollen, without differentiated setae; apical lobe absent; median sterno-
mesal sclerite and tuft absent; sternomesal surface without specialized scales; dor-
sal, lateral and ventral surfaces with numerous scales and bristles; numerous long
strong setae on sternomesal surface. Claspette: Well developed; stem short, more
or less straight in dorsal aspect; spiculose; 2 very strong, elongate setae arising
from dorsal surface distally; with 1 or 2 additional fine setae; filament long, slight-
ly flattened apically, curved dorsad, without ridge or retrorse barb on convex side.
Clasper: Simple, moderately long, curved in apical portion, basal portion swol-
len; spiculose and with longitudinal ridges or wrinkles; apex with 2-4 fine setae,
70 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
on both inner and outer surfaces; apical spiniform moderately long, 0.21-0.28
length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderately large, without teeth; subcyl-
indrical with median constriction. Proctiger: Strongly developed; not unusually
long in dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization vertical; paraproct well sclero-
tized, with a single strongly sclerotized apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 3-9.
PUPA (fig. 36). Abdomen: about 3.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.44 mm. Paddle: 0.74
mm. Cephalothorax: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair 5-C
weakly to moderately developed, short to moderately long, reaching 0.3-0.6 dis-
tance from its base to that of trumpet. Trumpet: Light to dark brown basally,
becoming lighter apically. Broadening gradually from base to apex; tracheoid sculp-
turing relatively well developed in basal 0.08-0.13; reticulate sculpturing strong.
Abdomen: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter posteriorly. Tergites II-VI or VII
with a strong irregular transverse ridge anteriorly, usually slightly caudad of level
of hair O of corresponding segment. Hair 1-II usually strongly developed, usually
2,3b (1-5); hair 1-IJI,[V moderately to strongly developed, 1-3b (1-4); hair 1-V-
VII weakly to moderately developed, smallest on VII, single. Hair 2 laterad of
1 on III, mesad or laterad of 1 on IV and V. Hair 5-IV,V 0.7-1.1 length of cor-
responding segment; 5-VII usually moderately long, single, usually of same strength
as 4-VII, but shorter. Hair 6-III-V subequally developed, short to moderately long,
fine; 6-VI,VII subequally developed or 6-VI more strongly developed, similar to
- 6-III-V or longer and/or stronger. Hair 8-VI,VI!I ventral. Hair 9-III-VI fine, mod-
erately long, sometimes slightly longer on VI, usually caudad of level of hair 6
of corresponding segment; 9-VII relatively close to caudolateral angle of segment,
with 1 or 2 (1-3) long primary branches; 9-VIII at or slightly mesad or cephalad
of caudolateral angle of segment, with 3-5 (3-6) long strong primary branches.
Hair 10-VI usually relatively far mesad of 11-VI. Terminal Segments: Male geni-
tal lobe moderately large, about 1.2-1.4 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length
subequal to or greater than width. Apex emarginate, subtruncate or rounded. Mid-
rib conspicuous only basally; no conspicuously wrinkled area near apex. No long
marginal spicules. Hair 1-P moderately long, single.
LARVA (fig. 37). Head: 0.98 mm. Siphon: 0.55 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.35 mm.
Head: Moderately pigmented, ocular area lighter, posterior surface darker. Anter-
ior portion of head shortened. Ocular lobe very prominent. Labial plate conspic-
uously narrowed anteriorly. Hair 1-C very stout. Hairs 4,6-C relatively close to
labrum. Hair 4-C weakly developed, single (single or double); distinctly mesad of
1-C, cephalad or slightly caudad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C single; distinctly lat-
erad of 6-C. Hair 6-C single; mesad of 1-C. Hair 7-C single. Hair 15-C moder-
ately long, usually double (1-4b). Mental plate variable in shape, with 4-6 (3-7)
large blunt teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Shaft usually without
spicules. Hair 1-A moderately long, single. Thorax: Dorsal fat body usually weak-
ly pigmented. Integument without spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5,6-P usually sep-
arate, that of 7-P always separate. Hair 1-M,T short to moderately long, usually
branched. Hair 4-P usually single (single or double). Hair 5-P usually double (1-4b);
hair 5-M usually single (single or double). Hair 11-P,M,T distinctly shorter than
9-P. Hair 13-T strongly developed, usually 3-5b (2-6); subequal to 14-M or some-
what shorter. Hair 14-M strongly developed, usually 2,3b (1-4). Abdomen: Hair
1-I usually moderately developed, 2,3b (2-5); hair 1-IV,V moderately to strongly
developed, usually single or double (1-3b). Hair 2-III-V slightly to distinctly me-
sad of hair 1 of corresponding segment; usually double (1-4b). Hair 3-VII weakly
developed, short, single. Hair 5-II-[V moderately developed, usually 2,3b (2-5).
Zavortink: New World Aedes 71
Hair 6-III-V usually 2,3b (2-6). Hair 9-III-V usually double (1-3b). Hair 11-I mod-
erately to strongly developed, usually 4,5b (3-8). Hair 12-I absent. Hair 13-I strong-
ly developed; 1-3b (1-4); hair 13-IV,V strongly developed, 1-3b; hair 13-VI weak-
ly to moderately developed, 1-3b, cephalad of 10-VI. Segment VIII: Hairs 1 and
2 separated. Hair 1 moderately to strongly developed, 3-5b (2-6). Comb scales
moderate in size; usually fringed with several apical elements of fringe enlarged;
relatively few [9-14 (7-18)] in 1 regular to irregular row. Siphon: Weakly to
moderately pigmented, frequently lighter apically. Short, index 1.3-1.6. Acus very
large. Pecten teeth with numerous basal denticles or serrations; 11-17 (10-20) in
a short even row that is conspicuously curved dorsad or oblique. Hair 1-S dis-
tad of pecten; moderately developed, usually 3,4b (3-5). Anal Segment: Dispro-
portionately large. Saddle large; without spines on caudal border; weakly to mod-
erately pigmented. Hair 1-X very strongly developed, long, single. Hair 2-X 4,5b
(3-5). Hair 3-X 2,3b. Ventral brush (4-X) moderately developed; usually with 8
pairs of hairs; all but most proximal 1 or 2 pairs of hairs from strongly sclero-
tized boss; hair 4a-X very short and fine, usually single (single or double); 4b,
4c-X 2,3b. Anal gills large to very large, inflated, tapering distally; dorsal sub-
equal in length to or somewhat longer than ventral, about 1.0-1.9 (1.0-3.6) of
anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes ramirezi is so different from all other New World Aedes
that the subgenus Aztecaedes is being erected for it. The most conspicuous dis-
tinguishing features of ramirezi can be found in the diagnosis of the subgenus.
Aztecaedes shows no definite relationship to any other New World group. The
shape of the aedeagus of the male genitalia and several larval features, such as
the absence of hair 12-I, the single 3-VII, the curved pecten, the branched 3-X,
and the boss at the base of the ventral brush, suggest a possible remote relation-
ship with Gymnometopa. Aztecaedes is apparently another relict group that has
persisted at the edge of the Neotropics.
The most striking variation in the adults of ramirezi involves the acrostichal
bristles, which may be present in a long complete row or restricted to the anter-
ior promontory. In the larva the mental plate is quite variable in shape; some
of this variation appears to be due to abrasion.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of ramirezi have been collected in holes in vol-
canic rock and on 1 occasion in a rothole in a tree. In the former habitat they
have been associated 1 or more times with the immatures of Ae. (Ochlerotatus)
epactius, Ae. (Protomacleaya) gabriel Schick, 1970 and Ae. (P.) idanus Schick,
1970. In the latter habitat they were associated with gabriel only. One male has
been collected from the surface of the water in a rockhole and 1 female has been
taken in a biting-landing collection with human host between 1330 and 1600 hours.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 29). Aedes ramirezi is presently known from the Mexican
States of Jalisco and Morelos at elevations between 1600 and 1900 meters. Mater-
ial examined: 242 specimens; 24 males, 27 females, 134 larvae, 57 pupae; 44 in-
dividual rearings (27 larval, 15 pupal, 2 incomplete).
MEXICO. Jalisco: Las Animas, 9 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 678),
1 lpM (678-10), 1 M gen [UCLA]. Morelos: Vicinity of Tepoztlan (including Gabriel Mariaca),
29 June 1947, W.G. Downs, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]; 7 Sept 1965, D.A. Schroeder (MEX 347), 1 L;
same data (MEX 348), 1 lpM (348-14), 1 lpF (348-13), 1 M gen, 4 L; same data (MEX 354), 3 L;
28 June 1970, D.A. and K. Schroeder (MEX 506), 1 IpM (506-17), 1 IpF (506-18); same data
(MEX 512), 1 IpF (512-10), 57 L; same data (MEX 513), 1 Ip (513-10), 2 L; 11 Aug 1970,
D.A. and K. Schroeder (MEX 616), 2 IpM (616-10,11), 1 IpF (616-12), 1 P, 5 L; same data
(MEX 621), 1 pF (621-100); same data (MEX 623), 5 lpM (623-11,14-17,18,19), 2 IpF (623-
Fa Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
18,19), 1 M gen, 1 L; same data (MEX 625), 1 F; same data (MEX 626), 5 lpM (626-11,14,15,
19,21), 6 IpF (626-12,13,18,20,22,23), 1 lp (626-16), 4 pM (626-100,103,106,108), 10 pF (626-
101,102,104,105,107,109-113), 3 M, 3 M gen, 1 F, 10 P, 26 L; same data (MEX 627), 1 M;
same data (MEX 628), 1 F, 4 L; 6 Aug 1970, C. Machado-Allison and A. Barrera (UCLA 579),
2 P, 2 L [UCLA].
Subgenus GYMNOMETOPA Coquillett
1906. Gymnometopa Coquillett, 1906b:183. TYPE SPECIES: Stegomyia mediovittata Coquil-
let, 1906, Dominican Republic; original designation.
15. Aedes (Gymnometopa) mediovittatus (Coquillett)
Figs. 2938-40
1906. Stegomyia mediovittata Coquillett, 1906a:60. TYPE: Holotype male (99.4) with assoc-
iated larval and pupal skins, San Domingo [Dominican Republic] , Aug, A. Busck [USNM;
see Stone and Knight, 1956:221].
1907. Aedes uncatus Grabham, 1907:25. TYPE: Lectotype male (210) with slide of male
genitalia, near Kingston, Jamaica, M. Grabham [USNM; selection of Stone and Knight,
1956:226]. Synonymy with mediovittatus by Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:821).
Aedes (Finlaya) mediovittatus of Bonne and Bonne-Wepster (1925:420-421); Dyar (1928:227-
228); Edwards (1932:152); Knight and Marks (1952:530,531,558); Lane (1953:695-697);
Perez Vigueras (1956:248-257); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:167); Forattini (1965:394-
395); Cova Garcia, Sutil and Rausseo (1966a:57; 1966b:12,332); Belkin, Heinemann and Page
(1970:171-175).
Aedes mediovittata of Dyar and Knab (1906:196); Dyar (1906:15); Howard, Dyar and Knab
(1917:821-824).
Aedes (Gualteria) mediovittata of Dyar (1918:73,79).
Gymnometopa mediovittata of Coquillett (1906c:25).
Stegomyia mediovittata of Grabham (1907:25).
FEMALE (fig. 38). Wing: 3.19 mm. Proboscis: 2.56 mm. Forefemur: 2.22 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.7 mm. Dark scales without conspicuous metallic reflections.
Head: Eyes broadly separated above antennae, the resulting space with a divided
row of narrow curved or broad flat white to silver-white scales. Integument light to
dark brown. Frontal bristles absent. Orbital bristles relatively few, mesal 3-5 pairs
strongly developed, lateral 3 or 4 pairs moderately developed. Vertex and anter-
ior portion of occiput with a few predominantly dark proclinate erect scales and
with numerous broad flat decumbent scales that vary from predominantly dark
anteriorly and predominantly yellow or dingy-yellow laterally and posteriorly to
entirely dark except for a small dorsolateral whitish to yellowish patch. Poster-
ior portion of occiput with upright erect scales that vary from predominantly
yellow or dingy-yellow to predominantly dark and with yellow narrow curved
decumbent scales. Complete coronal line of white or silver narrow curved scales
developed. Complete orbital line not developed, but with 3 patches of broad flat
silver scales at margin of eye. Dorsolateral and lateral surfaces with broad flat
predominantly cream-colored to yellowish scales. Ventral surface setose, with only
a few scattered broad flat scales. Clypeus large, bare. Proboscis slender, longer
than forefemur; dark scaled with scattered light scales in middle portion; with
Zavortink: New World Aedes 73
a few basal bristles. Palpus short, about 0.20-0.22 length of proboscis; 4-segmented,
segment 4 moderate in size; segments 1-3 with bristles; dark scaled with white
scales in patch at base of segment 3, covering all of segment 4 and sometimes
scattered on segment 2. Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus with conspicuous
large patch of broad flat silver scales; flagellar segment 1 longer than 2, slightly
swollen, with small dark scales; flagellar segments 2-10 usually with 8 moderate
bristles in basal whorl, segments 11-13 usually with 6; flagellar segment 3 slightly
longer than 2, segments 3-12 more or less subequal in length. Thorax: Integu-
ment brown. Acrostichal bristles restricted to anterior promontory; dorsocentral
bristles present in complete row; prescutellar and supraalar bristles numerous and
well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles present,
strongly developed; parascutellar bristle absent. Scutellum with 3-5 very strong
bristles on midlobe, 3 or 4 on lateral lobe. Mesoscutum completely but sparsely
covered with scales except for anterior inner dorsocentral, lateral fossal and med-
ian and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; small narrow curved background scales
varying from entirely brown except for a few golden in supraalar area to brown
only mesad of dorsocentral, lateral prescutal and supraalar bristles and largely
golden or coppery in and behind fossa; highly ornamented with narrow longitud-
inal lines of silver-white, silver and golden scales, as follows: (1) acrostichal line
of small narrow curved silver-white scales from small patch of similar scales on
anterior promontory to prescutellar space, (2) short line or patch of broad flat
silver scales in caudolateral portion of fossa, (3) supraalar line of broad flat sil-
ver scales, (4) short diagonal line of broad flat silver scales above pra, (5) lateral
prescutellar line of broad flat silver scales, (6) anterior inner dorsocentral line of
small narrow curved golden scales, line sometimes broadened on humeral angle,
slightly convergent with its mate posteriorly, and (7) posterior outer dorsocentral
line of small narrow curved scales, varying from entirely golden to partially or
entirely silver-white. Scutellum with broad flat scales on all lobes; scales of mid-
lobe dark basally, silver apically; scales of lateral lobe all silver. Paratergite mod-
erately broad, with broad flat silver scales along lower edge. Apn not enlarged.
Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong suture. Meron large. Pleuron with bris-
tles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra, stp and upper mep; stp bristles few, above and
below median stp scale patch, | of lower bristles very strong; ssp and lower mep
bristles absent. Integument of pleuron frequently darkened around scale patches.
Apn with line of broad flat silver scales; ppn with short line or patch of broad
flat silver scales in front of mesothoracic spiracle and with narrow curved dark
scales along upper edge; broad flat silver scales in patches on ppl, upper pcx, ssp,
stp caudad of ssp, stp dorsad of midcoxa and in 2 small distinctly separated to
contiguous patches or | large oblique patch in upper mep; pst, hypostigial area,
Psp, pra, upper stp, lower mep and metameron without scales. Legs: Hindcoxa
subequal in size to or smaller than midcoxa, its base far below upper margin of
meron. Legs long, the forefemur about 1.50-1.55 times distance from top of tho-
rax to tip of midcoxa. Forecoxa with light and dark scales on outer surface; mid-
coxa and hindcoxa with light scales on outer surface. Femora dark scaled with
extensive light markings, as follows: forefemur with white to yellowish scales scat-
tered in distal portion, in streak at base of ventral surface, sometimes in streak
at base of dorsal surface and in broad streak from base to apex of posterior sur-
face; midfemur with white scales few and scattered in basal portion of anterior
surface or numerous and forming complete or broken line from base to or near
apex of anterior surface and scattered in distal portion of posterior surface and
74 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
with white to yellowish scales in streak in basal portion of posterior surface and
in narrow complete or medially broken streak along entire ventral surface; hind-
femur with white scales in complete line from base to near apex of anterior sur-
face and scattered in distal posterior surface and with white to yellowish scales
in streak in basal portion of posterior surface and in short streak at base and
apex of ventral surface. Knee spots small to large, white, largest on hindleg. Tib-
iae dark scaled with white scales in small patch about 0.22-0.33 distance from
base of foretibia and midtibia and in large patch about 0.31-0.43 distance from
base of hindtibia and sometimes with pale scales streaked at base of ventral and/
or posterior surfaces of all tibiae. Tarsi dark scaled with white patches, bands
or rings, as follows: moderately broad band at base of segments 1 and 2 of fore-
tarsus and midtarsus; sometimes small patch at base of segment 3 of foretarsus
and midtarsus; broad band at base of segment 1 of hindtarsus; broad ring at base
of segments 2 and 3 of hindtarsus; very broad ring at base of segment 4 of hind-
tarsus; and broad patch, band or ring at base of segment 5 of hindtarsus. Claws
of foreleg and midleg with acute submedian tooth, claws of hindleg simple. Wing:
Entirely dark scaled or with small patch of silver-white scales at base of leading
edge or underside of costa. Plume scales present on dorsum of veins Rs, R243,
R,, R3; and M basad of furcation. Haltere: Scales silver-white and dark. Abdo-
men: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally. Laterotergite with large patch
of silver scales. Tergites and sternites VI and VII completely scaled. Slightly
outstanding scales present. Tergites II-VII dark scaled with basolateral or sub-
median lateral silver patch and frequently with irregular yellowish or whitish ba-
sal band on at least segments III-VI; distal scales of silver patches slightly out-
standing. Sternites quite variable; proximal (1) entirely whitish or yellowish scaled,
(2) predominantly whitish or yellowish scaled with submedian lateral silver patch
and/or apicolateral dark patch or apical dark band, or (3) predominantly dark
scaled with submedian lateral silver patch; distal sternites with whitish, yellow-
ish or dark scales basally, with postmedian lateral patch or transverse band of
silver scales and with apicolateral patch or apical band of dark scales.
FEMALE GENITALIA (fig. 38). Segment VIII: Tergite narrowed apically, length
along midline about 0.62-0.66 of tergite VII; distal 0.60-0.70 with scales and bris-
tles. Sternite long, about 1.3-1.5 length of tergite, broader distally; distal margin
more or less straight; all but narrow basal and lateral areas with bristles, these
more numerous along midline and distal margin, most weakly developed and fine
but some moderately developed and elongate; scales relatively few, present lat-
erally, usually more numerous distally. Tergite LX: Deeply notched apically, max-
imum length about 0.63-0.71 of tergite VIII; moderately sclerotized; apical lobe
with 2-4 fine setae. Insula: Moderately sclerotized; connected to sigma; with 3
or 4 pairs of moderately developed setae. Cercus: Moderately long, length of dor-
sal edge 0.72-0.82 length of tergite VIII; compressed; apex pointed to rounded
in lateral view; bristles numerous distally, the largest moderately developed; num-
erous scales present. Postgenital Plate: Moderately long and broad, length 0.54-
0.60 of tergite VIII; index about 1.8; apex rounded or subtruncate in ventral view;
distal portion with numerous weakly to moderately developed setae; basal med-
ian longitudinal apodeme not developed. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized. Atrial plate
large, strongly sclerotized. Sigma: Continuous with cowl; weakly sclerotized. No
part of spermathecal duct strongly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclero-
tized, more or less spherical, 1 enlarged.
MALE (fig. 38). Essentially as for female except for sexual characters. Head:
Zavortink: New World Aedes 75
Erect scales of occiput predominantly dark. Proboscis relatively slender. Palpus
subequal in length to proboscis; 5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 ankylosed, rela-
tively short, comprising 0.48-0.53 length of palpus; segment 4 moderately long,
Q0.20-0.23 length of palpus; segment 5 moderately long, 0.20-0.22 length of pal-
pus; palpus slender except for slightly swollen apex of segment 3 and base of
segment 4; palpus curved dorsad from apex of segment 3 distad, segments 4 and
5 not drooping; apex of segments 3 and 5 and all of segment 4 with few mod-
erately long bristles; palpus dark scaled with white scales in broad basal band
on segment 2, moderately broad basal band on segment 3 and narrow basal band
on segments 4 and 5. Antenna much shorter than proboscis; torus greatly en-
larged, with large conspicuous patch of silver scales; flagellum strongly plumose,
segments 1-12 with very numerous long bristles; flagellar segment 1 elongate, with
scales; flagellar segments 12 and 13 elongate, penultimate longer, the 2 combined
shorter than total length of segments 1-11. Legs: Claws of foreleg and. midleg
enlarged, unequal; larger claw with blunt submedian tooth, smaller with small
acute submedian tooth. Claws of hindleg small, simple. Abdomen: Apical seg-
ments and genitalia not bent ventrad. Sternites with dark scales basally.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 39). Very lightly to moderately pigmented, various
shades of straw-yellow and brown, except for deeply pigmented apex of para-
proct. Segment VIII: Tergite long, 0.92-0.96 length of sternite; largely retracted,
only distal 0.34-0.43 scaled. Segment IX: Well developed; middorsal portion of
tergite weakly sclerotized, caudad of or at the level of base of sidepiece; tergite
lobes moderately prominent, narrowly to moderately broadly connected middor-
sally, each with 2-4 weakly to moderately developed setae in 1 or 2 series; ster-
nite large, with 5-8 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, subcylindrical; mesal
surface membranous from base to near apex, the membranous area unusually broad
and extending far ventrad in basal half of sidepiece; basal tergomesal area not
or slightly swollen, with a single long strong differentiated seta that arises from
a tubercle and is gently curved apically, and with an elongate sclerotized area
that extends ventrad and caudad into mesal membrane and that bears many mod-
erately long fine setae; apical lobe not developed; median sternomesal sclerite and
tuft not developed; sternomesal surface without differentiated scales; dorsolateral,
lateral and basal ventral surfaces with numerous scales; dorsomesal, lateral and
distal ventral surfaces with numerous bristles; apical half of sternomesal surface
with numerous elongate setae, many of the dorsalmost of these moderately stout
to near apex and sinuous. Claspette: Well developed; stem long, angled laterad
distally in dorsal aspect; spiculose in basal half; with 1-4 fine setae; filament long,
curved dorsad, expanded near middle and with retrorse angle on convex side. Clasp-
er: Simple, short; middle portion slightly to moderately swollen, straight or slight-
ly curved inward; basal and median portions with longitudinal ridges and wrin-
kles; spicules very inconspicuous; apex of inner surface with small alveolus or
papilla that only rarely bears a fine seta; apical spiniform long, 0.5-0.7 of clasp-
er. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderately large, without teeth; base subparallel-sided
or narrowing distally in dorsal aspect, apex bulbous. Proctiger: Strongly develop-
ed; not unusually long in dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization vertical; para-
proct well sclerotized, with a single heavily sclerotized apical tooth; cercal setae
fine, short, 3-5.
PUPA (fig. 39). Abdomen: about 3.3 mm. Trumpet: 0.41 mm. Paddle: 0.65
mm. Cephalothorax: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair 5-
C moderately developed, moderately long, reaching 0.3-0.5 distance from its base
76 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
to that of trumpet. Trumpet: Light golden brown to brown. Broadening gradu-
ally from base; tracheoid sculpturing virtually absent; reticulate sculpturing strong.
Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter posteriorly. Tergite I] with
a strong irregular transverse ridge near level of hair 0; tergites III-VII without a
strong transverse ridge anteriorly.. Hair 1-I] moderately developed, usually 3-13b
(2-22); hair 1-III moderately developed, usually 2-6b (1-12); hair 1-IV,V mod-
erately to weakly developed, usually 1-3b (1-5); hair 1-VI,VII weakly to mod-
erately developed, single or double (1-3b). Hair 2-III-V far laterad of hair 1 of
corresponding segment. Hair 5-IV,V 0.5-0.8 length of corresponding segment; 5-
VII moderately long, usually single (single or double), stronger and as long as
or longer than 4-VII. Hairs 6-III-V fine, moderately long, all subequally develop-
ed; 6-VI usually longer and stronger than 6-III-V, rarely subequal to 6-III-V; hair
6-VII usually much longer and stronger than 6-VI, usually strongly barbed or
dendritically branched. Hair 8-VI,VII ventral. Hair 9-III-VI moderately long to
long, fine to stout, subequal on all segments or becoming longer on posterior
segments or 9-VI much longer and stronger than 9-III-V and then sometimes 2,3b,
usually cephalad of the level of hair 6 of the corresponding segment; 9-VII far
cephalad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 2-4 long primary branches; 9-
VIII at or slightly mesad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 6-16 long strong
primary branches. Hair 10-VI far mesad of 11-VI. Terminal Segments: Male gen-
ital lobe moderately large, about 1.2-1.3 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Length
greater than width. Apex rounded, subtruncate or emarginate. Midrib conspicuous
to or nearly to apex; usually no wrinkled area near apex. Without long marginal
spicules. Hair 1-P long, usually single (single or double).
LARVA (fig. 40). Head: 0.79 mm. Siphon: 0.52 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.26 mm.
Head: Lightly to moderately pigmented. Labial plate subquadrate. Hair 1-C very
stout. Hairs 4,6-C near labrum. Hair 4-C strongly developed, 9-14b; distinctly
mesad of 1-C, caudad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C single; distinctly laterad of 6-C.
Hair 6-C single, in line with or mesad of 1-C. Hair 7-C usually double (1-3b).
Hairs 11,14-C and bmh stellate. Hair 12-C not stellate, 1-3b. Hair 15-C long, 2-
4b. Mental plate with 8-11 teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Shaft
without spicules. Hair 1-A short, single. Thorax: Fat body pigmented. Integu-
ment without conspicuous spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5,6-P joined, that of 7-P
separate. Hair 1-M,T relatively short, stellate. Hair 4-P stellate, 6-14b. Hair 5-P
usually double (1-3b); hair 5-M double. Hair 11-P,M,T shorter than 9-P. Hairs 13-
T and 14-M strongly developed, stellate, subequal, 5-14b. Abdomen: Hair 1-I,IV,V
moderately to strongly developed, stellate, 6-15b. Hair 2-III-V distinctly laterad
of hair 1 of corresponding segment; stellate, 5-11b. Hair 3-VII strongly devel-
oped, long, single. Hair 5-II-IV strongly developed, stellate, 6-16b. Hair 6-III-V
usually double (2,3b). Hair 9-III-V stellate, 4-9b. Hair 11-I moderately to strong-
ly developed, stellate, usually 5-14b. Hair 12-I absent. Hair 13-I strongly devel-
oped, stellate, 6-13b; hair 13-IV,V strongly developed, stellate, 5-14b; hair 13-
VI strongly developed, stellate, 5-10b, cephalolaterad or laterad of 10-VI. Seg-
ment VIII: Hairs 1 and 2 separated. Hair 1 moderately to strongly developed,
stellate, 5-11b. Comb scales large; consisting of 1 or 2 long and usually 1-3 short-
er unfringed spines from a large plate, the long spines usually becoming longer
on more ventral comb scales; relatively few [5-8 (4-9)] in a curved row. Siphon:
Lightly to moderately pigmented, base much darker. Short; index 1.8-2.3. Acus
not developed. Pecten teeth simple or laciniate at apex; becoming conspicuous-
ly larger distad; 17-30 in a long even row that is arcuate dorsad distally. Hair
Zavortink: New World Aedes 77
1-S distad of pecten; moderately developed, single, rarely double. Anal Segment:
Saddle large; caudal margin with several large spines dorsad of hair 1-X; lightly
to moderately pigmented. Hair 1-X strongly developed, usually 3-5b (2-6). Hair
2-X 4-6b. Hair 3-X 3,4b. Ventral brush moderately developed, with 5 or 6 pairs
of hairs; all hairs or all but most proximal 1 or 2 hairs from strongly sclerotized
boss; hair 4a-X long, usually 3,4b (3-6); hairs 4b,4c-X usually 3,4b (3-6). Anal
gills small, tapering distally; dorsal longer than ventral, about 0.5-1.0 length of
anal saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes mediovittatus is easily separated from the other New
World members of the genus as follows: in the adult by (1) the ornamentation
of the mesoscutum, which has a silver-white narrow median acrostichal line, a
golden anterior inner dorsocentral line, a golden to silver-white posterior outer
dorsocentral line, silver supraalar and lateral prescutellar lines, and a silver patch
or short line in the caudolateral portion of the fossa and above the prealar knob,
(2) the absence of a patch of scales on or below the prealar knob, (3) the pres-
ence of a long narrow white line on the anterior surface of the hindfemur, (4)
the absence of a complete light orbital line, the eye bordered by 3 separate patches
of broad flat silver scales, (5) the presence of 8 bristles in the basal whorl of
flagellar segments 2-10 in the female, and the combination of (6) the broad flat
scales on the vertex of the head, the paratergite and all 3 lobes of the scutel-
lum, (7) the absence of a parascutellar bristle, (8) the scaling of the posterior
pronotum, which has narrow curved dark scales along the upper edge and broad
flat silver scales in front of the mesothoracic spiracle, and (9) the palpus of the
male, which has segments 4 and 5 long, slender, upturned and sparsely bristled;
in the male genitalia by (1) the retrorse angle on the convex side of the claspette
filament, (2) the large membranous basal sternomesal area of the sidepiece, (3)
the specialized setae, which are sinuous and coarse to near their apices, along the
distal sternomesal margin of the sidepiece, and the combination of (4) the single
long strongly differentiated seta that arises. from a tubercle on the dorsal surface
of the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece, (5) the long spiniform of the clasp-
er, (6) the long stem of the claspette, and (7) the distally expanded aedeagus;
in the pupa by (1) the strongly developed and long hair 6-VII, and the com-
bination of (2) the position of 2-III-V, which is far laterad of hair 1 of the cor-
responding segment, (3) the short 5-IV,V, which is only 0.5-0.8 the length of
the corresponding tergite, (4) the usually elongate and strong 9-III-VI, and (5)
the 6-16 long strong primary branches of 9-VIII; and in the larva by (1) the 5-
8 (4-9) comb scales with 1 or 2 long and usually 1-3 shorter unfringed spines
from a large basal plate, (2) the simple or apically laciniate pecten teeth, (3)
the dorsally curved row of pecten teeth, and the combination of (4) the absence
of hair 12-I, (5) the long, strong, single 3-VII, (6) the moderately to strongly
developed stellate 9-III-V, (7) the absence of a distinct acus at the base of the
siphon, (8) the large spines on the caudal margin of the anal saddle, (9) the 3-
or 4-branched 3-X, and (10) the strongly sclerotized boss at the base of the ven-
tral brush.
Aedes mediovittatus has so many unique features or unique combinations of
characters in all stages that I believe it should be placed in a separate subgenus
and I am, therefore, resurrecting Gymnometopa. Gymnometopa is definitely re-
lated to Howardina, as was pointed out many years ago by Dyar (1928:228),
and possibly related to the monotypic subgenera of Aedes occuring north of the
tropics in Mexico and the southwestern United States. As indicated by Belkin
78 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
(1962:347), the Old World species placed in Group E (Mediovittatus Group) of
Finlaya by Edwards (1932:151-152) and Knight and Marks (1952:530-531) have
very little in common with mediovittatus and are not related to it. Gymnometopa
is apparently a relict that has survived with success only in the Greater Antillean
area, possibly because of the absence of direct competition from other treehole
and rockhole aedines in this area where the culicid fauna breeding in such habi-
tats is depauperate.
Aedes mediovittatus is a highly variable species in all stages. Although much
of the variation occurs in all populations, some of it is regional. In the adults,
which are available from Cuba, Cayman Brac, Jamaica, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, and Venezuela, the scales of the head are largely yellowish
in the Jamaican and Venezuelan populations, and predominantly or entirely dark
in all other populations; the posterior outer dorsocentral lines are usually entirely
golden scaled in the Jamaican and Puerto Rican populations and partially or en-
tirely silver or varying from golden to silver in the other populations; the fos-
sal scales are dark in the populations in Hispaniola and Puerto Rico, and more
golden to coppery in the others; the white line on the anterior surface of the
midfemur is strongly developed in only the Jamaican and Venezuelan popula-
tions; the pale scales at the base of the femora are partially yellowish in the
Jamaican population, and white in all other populations; and, the sternites of the ab-
domen of the female are predominantly white to yellow scaled in the Cuban, Grand
Cayman, and Jamaican populations, and dark in the other populations in which
the female is known. In the pupae, available only from Jamaica, Hispaniola and
Puerto Rico, hair 1-IV,V is usually stronger and more highly branched in the
Jamaican population. In the larvae, available from Jamaica, Hispaniola, Puerto
Rico and St. Croix, hairs 1-M,T and 3-T are slightly weaker, 2-II-VII slightly strong-
er and the siphon slightly longer in the Jamaican population; the pecten teeth
are more frequently simple in the population in Hispaniola; and, the smaller spines
of the comb scales are, on the average, weakly developed or absent in the popu-
lation in Jamaica, moderately developed in the populations in Puerto Rico and St.
Croix, and strongly developed in the population in Hispaniola. In summary, the
Jamaican population is the most highly differentiated in the islands and the Ven-
ezuelan population, at least on the basis of the adults, appears to be closest to
the one in Jamaica.
BIONOMICS. Immatures of mediovittatus have been found in a wide variety
of habitats; among these are treeholes, broken or cut bamboo internodes, arti-
ficial containers, bromeliad leaf axils, rockholes and ground pools. Adults of medio-
vittatus have been collected resting in treeholes and crabholes and females have
been collected while biting humans and donkeys.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 29). Aedes mediovittatus is found in the West Indies,
from Cuba and the Cayman Islands eastward and southward through Jamaica, His-
paniola and Puerto Rico to the Virgin Islands, and also in northcentral Venezuela.
Belkin, Heinemann and Page (1970:174) thought the record of this species from
Venezuela reported in Dyar (1928:228) was erroneous and was based on mis-
identification of a sibling species or on mislabeled material. I have examined 2
males and their associated genitalia from Venezuela that are in the USNM col-
lection and have found them to fall within the range of variation of the insular
populations. Since mediovittatus was first reported from Venezuela by the resi-
dent Nunez-Tovar (1924; see Cova Garcia, Sutil and Rausseo, 1966b:332), Dyar
(1928:228) states: ‘““The occurrence of the species on the mainland has been ver-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 79
ified by the receipt of a pair from Dr. M. Nunez-Tovar;’’ and the specimens I
have examined exhibit a combination of variations unknown in any of the in-
sular populations, I am inclined to believe that the specimens in the USNM are
not mislabeled and that mediovittatus does occur in Venezuela. It has not, how-
ever, been recovered by either UCLA team that has collected in northcentral Ven-
ezuela and is apparently rare. Material examined: 2835 specimens; 488 males, 515
females, 1062 larvae, 770 pupae; 588 individual rearings (288 larval, 249 pupal,
51 incomplete).
CAYMAN ISLANDS. Cayman Brac, July 1967, M. Giglioli (CAY 17), 3 F [UCLA].
CUBA. La Habana: Cantiles Cayo, 21 Sept 1930, H.S. Peters, 1 F [USNM]. La Habana,
1909, P. Serre, 1 F [USNM]. San Antonio de los Banos, J.H. Pazos, 4 F [USNM]. Oriente:
Guantanamo Bay, U.S. Naval Station, 26-29 Oct 1953, K.L. Knight (444,448,450,452,460,463),
15 F [UCLA]. Santiago de Cuba, 4 M, 49 F [USNM]. Pinar del Rio: Mariel, J.H. Pazos, 7 F
[USNM] . Province not Specified: H.P. Carr (1,12,13,102), 12 M, 1 F, 2 M gen [UCLA].
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Distrito Nacional: Santo Domingo, Aug-Sept 1905, A. Busck, 8 M,
3 F, 3 M gen [USNM]; F.E. Campbell, 1 M [USNM]. Santo Domingo, near El Embajador Hotel,
9 July 1971, E. Drake and T. Rogers (RDO 103), 5 IpM (103-13,53,57-59), 6 IpF (103-12,50-
52,55,56), 1 Ip (103-11), 8 pM (103-84,87,92,98,102,103,108,111), 21 pF (103-81-83,85,86,
88-91 94,95 ,97,99-101,105,107,110,112-114), 8 P, 8 L; same data (RDO 104), 1 IpF (104-10);
same data (RDO 105), 1 IpF (105-10), 8 pF (105-102-109), 2 P; same data (RDO 106), 3 M;
same data (RDO 107), 1 F; same data except 23 July 1971 (RDO 151), 1 lpM (151-18), 1 pM
(151-106), 1 L [UCLA]. Santo Domingo, Finca Engombe, 2 July 1971, T. Rogers (RDO 74),
1 lp (74-10); 5 July 1971, E. Drake and T. Rogers (RDO 83), 1 lpM (83-11), 2 IpF (82-12,13);
13 July 1971, T. Rogers (RDO 123), 1 IpM (123-10), 1 IpF (123-11), 1 pM (123-100), 1 pF
(123-101); 22 July 1971, E. Drake (RDO 147), 1 pF (147-111); 7 Aug 1971, E. Drake (RDO
210), 5 IpM (210-21,22,24-26), 5 IpF (210-20,27-29,31), 9 pM (210-100,104,105,107-109,111-
113), 2 pF (210-102,103), 6 P, 5 L; 20 Aug 1971, T. Rogers (RDO 250), 4 L; same data (RDO
251), 1 IpM (251-10); 26 Aug 1971, T. Rogers (RDO 262), 4 lpM (262-10-13), 1 IpF (262-
14), 8 L [UCLA]. EZ Seibo: El Valle (11 km S), 30 June 1971, J.N. Belkin and T. Rogers
(RDO 66), 1 IpM (66-20) [UCLA]. San Cristobal: San Cristobal, near bridge over Canada Boruga,
27 July 1971, T. Rogers (RDO 170), 1 IpM (170-15), 8 IpF (170-10,11,13,16,19,21-23), 4 Ip
(170-12,14,17,18), 8 pM (170-102,103,105,107,108,111-113), 7 pF (170-100,101,104,106,109,
110,114), 3 M, 4 F, 10 P, 15 L [UCLA]. San Cristobal, La Cueva, 18 July 1971, T. Rogers
(RDO 138), 3 IpM (138-30,34,35), 2 IpF (138-31,36), 1 lp (138-33), 3 L; same data (RDO
143), 1 IpF (143-10) [UCLA]. San Cristobal and Hato Damas (between), 18 July 1971, T.
Rogers (RDO 140), 5 IpM (140-22,26,27,30,31), 1 F, 7 L [UCLA]. San Francisco Mines, Sept
1905, A. Busck, 19 M, 10 F [USNM]; 2 July 1971, E. Drake and T. Rogers (RDO 70), 3 IpM
(70-12-14), 6 IpF (70-10,11,15-18); same data (RDO 73), 1 lpM (73-24), 3 lpF (73-20-22), 2 L;
same data except 3 July 1971 (RDO 77), 4 IpM (77-14,16,18,23), 14 lpF (77-10-12,15,17,19,
21,22,24-29), 2 Ip (77-13,20), 4 pM (77-100-103), 1 M, 5 L; same data (RDO 78), 1 IpM
(78-10), 1 IpF (78-12); same data (RDO 79), 15 lpM (79-10-14,17-19,21-25,27,28), 4 lpF (79-
15,20,26,29), 6 pM (79-101,107-111), 6 pF (79-100,102-106), 7 M, 8 F, 17 P, 44 L; same
data except 6 July 1971 (RDO 95), 5 IpM (95-20,21,25,27,28), 4 IpF (95-22,24,26,32), 3 Ip
(95-29,31,33), 5 L; 8 July 1971, E. Drake (RDO 96), 5 lpM (96-10,14-16,19), 3 pM (96-103-
105), 2 lp (96-18,40), 4 M, 9 F, 5 P, 14 L; 12 July 1971, E. Drake (RDO 116), 3 lpM (116-26,28,
29), 6 IpF (116-20,21,23-25,27), 1 lp (116-22), 5 M, 3 F, 3 L; same data (RDO 118), 5 lpM
(118-10,12-14,22), 8 IpF (118-11,15-18,23-25), 1 lp (118-19), 4 L; same data (RDO 119), 1 lpF
(119-12), 1 pM (119-102); 26 July 1971, E. Drake (RDO 163), 1 lpM (163-24), 1 lpF (163-
45), 4 Ip (163-29,46-48), 4 pM (163-102,103,105,106), 3 pF (163-100,101,104), 1 F, 2 P,
19 L; 28 July 1971, E. Drake (RDO 175), 1 IpM (175-41), 4 IpF (175-13,15,18,19), 3 Ip
(175-40,42,44), 3 pM (175-95,97,98), 2 pF (175-96,99), 6 M, 1 P, 16 L; same data (RDO
177), 9 IpF (177-10-16,18,19), 3 pM (177-107,109,110), 5 pF (177-103-106,108), 1 M, 5 L;
same data (RDO 179), 1 IpF (179-19) [UCLA].
HAITI. Jeremie, 7 July 1941, 1 pM, 1 M [USNM]. Port-au-Prince, road to Petionville, 7 July
80 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
1968, D.C. Watson (HAT 13), 34 L [UCLA]. Trou Zombie, 25 May 1932, S.S. Cook, 2 F
[USNM].
JAMAICA. Clarendon: Balcarres, 7 Nov 1967, T.H. Farr (JA 902), 1 pM (902-103), 1 P
[UCLA]. Goshen, 18 Aug 1965, W.A. Page (JA 235), 1 pM (235-104); same data (JA 236),
1 pM. (236-28), 2 Ip (236-20,21), 10 L; same data (JA 238), 1 IpF (238-33), 1 Ip (238-32),
3 pF (238-105A,110,111), 1 M, 1 F, 2 P, 6 L; same data (JA 239), 1 IpF (239-20); 10 Sept
1965, J.N. Belkin and W.A. Page (JA 352), 2 P; 6 Sept 1966, D.C. Watson (JA 602), 4 L
[UCLA]. Mocho, 6 Sept 1966, D.C. Watson (JA 603), 1 IpM (603-19), 1 IM (603-18), 5 M, 11 F,
2 M gen, 14 L [UCLA]. Locality not specified, Jan 1946, G.A. Thompson, 1 F [USNM].
Kingston and St. Andrew: Constant Spring, 18 July 1964, J.N. Belkin and W.A. Page (JA 82),
7 L; 24 Aug 1965, D.C. Watson (JA 248), 1 P, 4 L; 7 Sept 1965, J.N. Belkin and W.A. Page (JA
327), 3 IpM (327-13,15,17), 2 lpF (327-11,26), 3 pM (327-105,106,113), 8 pF (827-93-95,97,
98,102,109,112), 3 lp (327-10,12,18), 6 M, 4 F, 2 M gen, 16 P, 67 L; same data (JA 328), 1 IpM
(328-30); 25 Sept 1965, W.A. Page (JA 387), 1 IpF (387-11), 3 pF (387-101,102,106), 6 M, 3 F,
6 P, 4 L; 3 Dec 1965, W.A. Page (JA 408), 1 IpF (408-13), 2 pM (408-100,101), 3 pF (408-102,
103,105); 16 Nov 1966, O.G.W. Berlin and D.C. Watson (JA 699), 4 IpM (699-11-13,18), 5 IpF
(699-14,16,17,19,20), 7 pM (699-30,101-103,106,112,114), 6 pF (699-31 ,104,108,110,111,113),
2 M, 2 M gen, 2 P, 2 L [UCLA]. Hermitage Dam Road, 10 Aug 1965, W.A. Page (JA 286),
1 L; same data (JA 288), 1 IpF (288-11); 13 Aug 1965, W.A. Page (JA 296), 1 L; 29 Oct
1965, W.A. Page (JA 390), 3 IpM (390-12,14,18), 3 IpF (390-10,13,19), 1 Ip (390-11), 2 pM
(390-103,104), 1 pF (390-100), 5 L; same data (JA 391), 1 IpF (391-30); 29 Oct 1965, W.A.
Page (JA 397), 1 lpF (397-12), 4 pM (397-101,102,104,107), 1 pF (397-100), 1 L; 21 Sept
1966, D.C. Watson (JA 623), 5 pM (623-100-104), 4 M, 2 M gen, 74 L; same data JA 624),
2 IpM (624-12,14), 2 IpF (624-10,11), 5 pM (624-100,101,104,106,107), 6 pF (624-103,105,
108-111), 1 P, 1 L; same data (JA 627), 1 M, 1 F [UCLA]. Kingston, M. Grabham, 4 M, 2 F
[USNM]; 22 June 1906, 1 M, 1 F [CU], 1 M gen [USNM]. Red Hills, 24 July 1967, W.A.
Page (JA 845), 1 IpM (845-10), 1 pF (845-101), 1 P, 10 L [UCLA]. Rockfort, 21 Aug 1968,
R.H. Hochman (JA 949), 1 F; 22 Aug 1968, R.H. Hochman (JA 952), 2 F [UCLA]. Temple
Hall, 25 Aug 1965, W.A. Page (JA 252), 1 pF (252-110) [UCLA]. Manchester: Kendal, 16
Sept 1945, 1 L [CU]. Mandeville, 24 Oct 1966, O.G.W. Berlin and D.C. Watson (JA 638), 3 IpM
(638-11,13,15), 2 IpF (638-16,17), 3 pM (638-100-102), 3 Ip (638-10,12,14), 2 M, 2 M gen, 5 P,
13 L [UCLA]. St. Catherine: Bog Walk, 4 Aug 1968, R.H. Hochman (JA 913), 1 F; 5 Aug
1968, R.H. Hochman (JA 914), 1 F [UCLA]. Rio Cobre Dam, 10 Sept 1965, J.N. Belkin and
W.A. Page (JA 351), 1 IpF (351-20,21), 1 pF (351-100), 2 P; 17 Sept 1965, D.C. Watson
(JA 373), 1 IpM (373-10), 4 pM (373-104,105,107,108), 1 pF (373-106), 1 M, 2 F,3 M gen, 2 P,
7 L; 9 Sept 1966, D.C. Watson (JA 605), 3 IpM (605-10-12), 1 Ip (605-13), 3 pM (605-101,103,
104), 2 pF (605-100,106), 2 L [UCLA]. St. Thomas: Arcadia, 6 Dec 1962, T.H.G. Aitken (42),
1 F [UCLA]. Grants Pen, 10 Dec 1965, W.A. Page (JA 410), 2 Ip (410-10,11), 6 L; 6 July
1967, W.A. Page (JA 801), 1 pM (801-100) [UCLA]. New Pera, 5 Dec 1962, T.H.G. Aitken
(55), 1 pM (5), 1 pF (6), 4M, 3 P, 3 L; same data (56), 7 L; 12 Dec 1962, T.H.G. Aitken (119), 2
IpM (1,3), 2 IpF (2,4), 3 Ip (6-8) [UCLA]. Westmoreland: Negril, 24 July 1965, W.A. Page
(JA 230), 1 P [UCLA]. Parish not Specified: R.B. Hill, 5 M, 1 F; M. Grabham, 23 L [USNM].
PUERTO RICO. Mona: 15 Nov 1954, M.L. Kuns, W.F. Pippin and J. Maldonado, 2 L; 9 June-
6 July 1955, W.F. Pippin and R. Bestgek, 6 L [USNM]. Puerto Rico: Aguadilla, 26 Sept 1959,
I. Fox and A. Boike, 1 L [USNM]. Barranquitas, km 24.8 Hwy 156, M.J. Nelson and J.N.
Belkin (PR 185), 5 lpM (185-10,12,15-17), 5 ipF (185-11,13,14,18,19), 6 pM (185-100,101,
103,104,106,107), 2 pF (185-102,105), 2 M, 2 P, 4 L [UCLA]. Carolina, 9 May 1942-18 Sept
1943, H.D. Pratt, 19 M, 13 F [UCLA], 2 M, 2 F, 6 L [USNM]. El Verde Field Station, 30
Aug 1970, J.N. Belkin et al. (PR 141), 1 pM (141-103), 6 pF (141-70,72,100,101,104,105), 1 P;
6 Sept 1970, J.N. Belkin (PR 174), 2 pF (174-100,102) [UCLA]. El Yunke, 30 Aug 1942,
T.H.G. Aitken and G.E. Bohart, 7 P, 5 L [UCLA]. Luquillo Forest, near end W branch Hwy 915,
29 Aug 1970, M.J. Nelson (PR 134), 1 IpM (134-12), 5 IpF (134-10,11,13-15), 1 pM (134-
103), 3 pF (134-100-102), 1 M gen, 1 P, 4 L; km 3.2 E branch Hwy 915, 29 Aug 1970, J.N.
Belkin and M.J. Nelson (PR 136), 1 IpM (136-15), 5 IpF (136-10-14), 4 pM (136-102,106,107,
109), 6 pF (136-100,101,103-105,110), 11 M, 14 F, 1 M gen, 25 P, 30 L [UCLA]. Mameyes,
Zavortink: New World Aedes 81
3 Aug 1964, K. and B. Bartholomew (PR 1), 2 IpM (1-12,14), 2 IpF (1-13,15), 1 L [UCLA].
Mayaguez, Sept, W.V. Tower, 20 M, 13 F, 3 L [USNM]; 24 July-15 Dec 1935, G.S. Tulloch, 2 F
[UCLA], 10M, 7 F, 1 L [USNM]. Naguabo, 10 Aug 1964, R. Koford and K. and B. Bartholomew
(PR 11), 2 IpM (11-14,18), 4 IpF (11-10,12,15,19), 1 IF (11-13), 2 Ip (11-16,20), 4 pM (11-
100-103); same data (PR 12), 2 lpM (12-10,17), 4 IpF (12-12-15), 1 lp (12-16), 2 pM (12-
100,101); same data (PR 13), 2 IpM (13-14,21), 8 IpF (13-10-12,15,16,18-20), 2 Ip (13-13,17),
1 M, 2 L; same data (PR 15), 3 IpM (15-13,20,24), 2 IpF (15-18,22), 1 Ip (15-16), 1 pM (15-
101), 3 pF (15-17,21,102), 6 M, 3 F, 1 M gen, 13 P, 105 L [UCLA]. Palmas Abajo, 17 Feb
1931, 2 L [CU]. Patillas, km 8.5 Hwy 184, 5 Sept 1970, M.J. Nelson (PR 173), 2 IpM (173-
10,13), 3 IpF (173-11,12,14), 4 pM (173-100-102,104), 1 pF (173-103), 1 M gen, 2 L [UCLA].
Playa de Humacao, 17 Aug 1964, K. and B. Bartholomew (PR 22), 1 IpM (22-10), 2 IpF (22-
12,13), 1 lp (22-11), 3 pM (22-101-103), 1 P, 1 M gen [UCLA]. Toro Negro Forest, km 31
Hwy 143, 7 Sept 1970, M.J. Nelson (PR 184), 3 lpM (184-11,13,15), 5 lpF (184-14,16-19), 2 pM
(184-101,104), 3 pF (184-100,102,103), 2 lp (184-10,12), 9 M, 1 M gen, 9 P, 12 L [UCLA].
Vega Baja, km 6 Hwy 160, 19 Aug 1970, J.N. Belkin et al. (PR 101), 5 IpM (101-10,11,13,15,
18), 7 IpF (101-12,14,16,17,19-21), 10 pM (101-100-109), 16 M, 8 F, 2 M gen, 29 P, 25 L
[UCLA]. Locality not specified, 7 M, 8 F [UCLA]. Vieques: 1942, H.S. Hurlbut, 2 M, 1 F,
1 M gen, 1 Ip [CU].
VENEZUELA. Aragua: Maracay, M. Nunez-Tovar, 2 M, 2 M gen [USNM].
VIRGIN ISLANDS. St. Croix: Frederiksted, July 1929 (LAR 4), 2 M, 1 F, 1 M gen [UCLA].
Sally’s Fancy, 5 Dec 1966, R.D. Walsh (VI 16), 31 L [UCLA]. Locality not specified, Oct
1934-Aug 1938, H.A. Beatty, 2 F, 6 L [USNM]. St. Thomas: Locality not specified, 1921,
F.D. Walker, 3 F; 9 Jan 1920, Peterson, 2 M, 2 F [USNM].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. 1 M gen (G 82) [USNM].
Subgenus OCHLEROTATUS Lynch Arribalzaga
1891. Ochlerotatus Lynch Arribalzaga, 1891a:374; 1891b:143. TYPE SPECIES: Ochlerotatus
confirmatus Lynch Arribalzaga, 1891, Argentina; second of 2 species, selection of
Coquillett (1910:577).
For complete synonomy see Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959).
PULCHRITARSIS SECTION
MUELLERI GROUP
16. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) muelleri Dyar
Figs. 41-44
1920. Aedes (Heteronycha) muelleri Dyar, 1920:81-82. TYPE: Lectotype male with genitalia
slide, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico, J. Miiller [USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight, 1956:222].
1922. Aedes iridipennis Dyar, 1922a:92. TYPE: Holotype female, head of Indian Creek, south
base of Cochise Head, Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona, United States of America, 17
Aug 1917, C.H.T. Townsend [USNM]. Synonymy with muelleri by Dyar (1922c:193).
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) muelleri of Dyar (1928:172); Edwards (1932:145); Carpenter and LaCasse
(1955:206); Belkin and McDonald (1957:188,190); McDonald (1957a:505-511); Stone, Knight
and Starcke (1959:149).
82 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Aedes muelleri of Dyar (1922c:193); Breland (1958:206); Nielsen, Arnell and Linam (1967:
75); Nielsen, Linam, Arnell and Zavortink (1968:362-363); Arnell and Nielsen (1972:4,16,
18,20).
Aedes (Gualteria) muelleri of Vargas (1950:62).
Aedes (Heteronycha) iridipennis of Dyar (1922b:55).
FEMALE (fig. 42). Wing: 4.22 mm. Proboscis: 3.24 mm. Forefemur: 2.37 mm.
Abdomen: about 4.0 mm. Dark scales of proboscis, palpus, legs and wings with
slight metallic blue, purple or violet reflections. Head: Eyes separated above an-
tennae, the resulting space with narrow curved white scales and usually also small
setae. Integument brown to dark brown. Frontal bristles well developed, 1-3 pairs.
Orbital bristles relatively few, mesal 4-8 pairs strongly developed, lateral 3-5 pairs
moderately developed. Vertex with relatively few erect scales that are white to
dingy white mesally and white and/or black laterally and numerous narrow curved
decumbent scales that are enlarged and white mesally and white and/or black lat-
erally. Occiput with numerous white and/or black erect scales and with few to
numerous white or white and black narrow curved scales. Orbital line developed,
scales broad, flat, white. Dorsolateral surface with broad flat white and usually
also black scales. Lateral and ventral surfaces with broad flat white scales. Cly-
peus moderately large, bare. Proboscis slender, much longer than forefemur; en-
tirely dark scaled; with a few basal bristles. Palpus short, about 0.18-0.23 length
of proboscis; 3- or 4-segmented, segment 4 minute to small when present; seg-
ments 1-3 with bristles; entirely dark scaled. Antenna much shorter than pro-
boscis; torus with large patch of flat white scales; flagellar segment | longer than
2, not swollen, with white scales mesally; flagellar segments 2-13 usually with
6 moderate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments 3-7 slightly longer
than preceding segment, segments 7-12 subequal. Thorax: Integument predomi-
nantly dark brown to blackish. Acrostichal and dorsocentral bristles numerous,
in long complete rows; prescutellar and supraalar bristles numerous and well de-
veloped; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles present, well de-
veloped; 1 parascutellar bristle present. Scutellum with 4-8 strong bristles on mid-
lobe, 5-7 on lateral lobe. Mesoscutum completely covered with narrow curved
scales except for the anterior inner dorsocentral and median and lateral prescu-
tellar bare spaces; with a conspicuous yet variable pattern of white to tannish-
white scales on a background of dark brown to black scales, as follows: light
scales in (1) broad acrostichal line from anterior promontory to prescutellar space,
(2) broad dense lateral prescutellar line, (3) broad anterior dorsocentral line that
may or may not be continuous with (4) narrow posterior outer dorsocentral
line, (5) very broad lateral marginal line, and (6) broad posterior fossal line that
meets posterior outer dorsocentral line mesally; light lateral marginal line some-
times much broadened and extending mesad to dorsocentral area and then en-
tire lateral third of mesoscutum light scaled. Scutellar lobes with narrow curved
white scales, those on midlobe enlarged. Paratergite rather narrow, with or with-
out scales. Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong suture.
Meron large. Pleuron with bristles very numerous on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra, stp
and upper mep; ppn bristles sometimes present along entire upper and posterior
margins of sclerite; stp bristles numerous, in complete row from near psp to mid-
coxa; ssp bristles absent, few or numerous; lower. mep bristles absent, but med-
ian anterior mep bristles sometimes present. Apn with narrow curved white scales;
ppn nearly totally covered with narrow curved scales, these entirely white or many
in upper portion black; broad flat to semierect white scales in large disheveled
Zavortink: New World Aedes 83
frequently contiguous patches on pst, ppl, hypostigial area, psp, ssp, pra, upper
half .of stp, lower posterior stp, nearly all of mep and metameron; pcx scales
present or absent; ssp scale patch sometimes extended dorsad toward patch on
ppn and/or hypostigial area. Legs: Hindcoxa subequal in size to midcoxa, its base
far below upper margin of meron. Legs moderately long, the forefemur about
1.19-1.32 times distance from top of thorax to tip of midcoxa. All coxae with
extensive area of white scales on outer surface. Femora dark scaled with exten-
sive areas of white scales, as follows: forefemur and midfemur with white scales
in streak from base to apex on posterior surface, in streak in basal half of dor-
sal and ventral surfaces and at extreme base of anterior surface; hindfemur en-
tirely or predominantly white scaled on all surfaces in basal half, sometimes white
to apex on ventral surface. Knee spots moderately large, white; smallest on fore-
leg, largest on hindleg. Tibiae and tarsi entirely dark scaled or foretibia and some-
times midtibia weakly streaked or speckled with white on ventral surface. Claws
of all legs simple. Wing: Entirely dark scaled or with small light patch at base
of costa. Plume scales present on dorsal side of veins Rs, R.+3, R2., R3, M basad
of furcation, and sometimes apical portion of 1A. Haltere: Scales white. Abdo-
men: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally. Laterotergite with large patch
of white scales. Tergites and sternites VI and VII completely scaled. Outstand-
ing scales absent. Tergites II-VII dark scaled with white scales in basolateral patch
and narrow basal band. Sternites variable, sometimes entirely white scaled, some-
times most or only most distal with separate or joined median basal and apico-
lateral dark patches.
FEMALE GENITALIA (fig. 42). Segment VIII: Tergite narrowed apically, length
along midline about. 0.53-0.57 of tergite VII; distal 0.67-0.72 with scales and
bristles. Sternite long, about 1.3-1.4 length of tergite, broader distally; distal mar-
gin shallowly emarginate; all but narrow basal and lateral areas with scales or
bristles, these occurring in about equal proportions; bristles denser along midline
distally and along distal margin; bristles weakly developed and short to moder-
ately developed and elongate, the larger ones predominating. Tergite LX: Notch-
ed apically, maximum length about 0.34-0.47 of tergite VIII; moderately sclero-
tized; apical lobe with 2-7 weakly developed bristles. Jnsula: Well sclerotized;
connected to sigma; with 2 or 3 pairs of moderately developed setae. Cercus:
Moderately long, length of dorsal edge 0.67-0.78 of tergite VIII; compressed; apex
rounded in lateral view; bristles numerous, the largest moderately developed; scales
present. Postgenital Plate: Short and broad, length 0.44-0.52 of tergite VIII; in-
dex about 1.3-1.4; apex subtruncate in ventral view; distal portion with weakly de-
veloped bristles; basal median longitudinal apodeme moderately to strongly scle-
rotized. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized. Atrial plates absent. Sigma: Continuous with
cowl; strongly sclerotized. Basal portion of spermathecal duct strongly sclero-
tized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized, more or less spherical, 1 noticeably
larger than others.
MALE (fig. 42). Essentially as in female except for sexual characters. Head:
Decumbent scales on dorsum usually all white; greater proportion of erect scales
white. Proboscis long and slender. Palpus variable in length, 0.78-0.97 of pro-
boscis; 5-segmented, segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.58-0.63
length of palpus; segment 4 short, 0.18-0.21 length of palpus; segment 5 short,
0.15-0.16 length of palpus; palpus slender except for slightly swollen apex of
segment 3 and basal portion of segment 4; palpus nearly straight, joint between
segments 3 and 4 slightly raised; apex of segment 3 and all of segment 4 with
84 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
numerous long bristles; segment 5 with fewer shorter bristles; dark scaled. An-
tenna much shorter than proboscis; torus much enlarged, with large patch of white
scales; flagellum strongly plumose, segments 1-12 with very numerous long bris-
tles; flagellar segment 1 slightly elongate, with scales; flagellar segments 12 and
13 elongate, the penultimate longer, the 2 combined slightly shorter than total
length of first 11 segments. Thorax: Lateral marginal line almost always extend-
ing mesad to dorsocentral area so that lateral third of mesoscutum is entirely
light scaled. Legs: Anterior claw of foreleg and midleg enlarged and with blunt
submedian tooth, the claw larger on midleg than foreleg; posterior claw of fore-
leg enlarged, simple; posterior claw of midleg and both claws of hindleg small,
simple. Abdomen: Apical segments and genitalia not bent ventrad. Sternites us-
ually predominantly dark scaled with basolateral light patch.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 43). Various shades of tan and/or brown; paraproct
darkest; midportion of IX-T, most of sidepiece and claspette filament well pig-
mented. Segment VIII: Tergite long, 0.90-1.00 length of sternite; exserted, api-
cal 0.53-0.71 scaled. Segment IX: Well developed; middorsal portion of tergite
moderately to strongly sclerotized, caudad of or at the level of base of sidepiece;
tergite lobes prominent, broadly connected middorsally, each with 2-6 strongly
developed setae in 1 or 2 series; sternite large, with 4-7 setae distally. Sidepiece:
Well developed, dorsal surface expanded basally and apically; mesal surface mem-
branous from base to apex; basal tergomesal area moderately swollen, with a few
short to moderately long fine setae and 1 long strong differentiated seta that is
bent beyond middle and usually hooked at apex; apical lobe absent, but dorsal
surface of sidepiece expanded at apex and bearing short fine setae mesally; med-
ian sternomesal sclerite and tuft absent; sternomesal surface without long broad
striated scales; middle portion of tergomesal surface without scales or setae, re-
mainder of tergal surface and lateral and ventral surfaces with numerous scales
and bristles; few to moderately numerous strong elongate setae in apical half of
sternomesal surface. Claspette: Well developed; stem short, more or less straight;
spiculose; with 1-3 weakly developed setae; filament long, flattened apically, an-
gled dorsad, with ridge on convex side, without retrorse barb. Clasper: Simple,
moderately long; slightly expanded beyond base, gently curved in basal portion;
median portion with longitudinal ridges or wrinkles; spiculose; apical portion with
2 or 3 setae on outer surface and sometimes | finer seta on inner surface; apical
spiniform moderately long, 0.23-0.30 length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus small,
without teeth; usually dolioform with rounded base and apex, sometimes broad-
est near base or near apex. Proctiger: Strongly developed; not unusually long in
dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization vertical; paraproct well sclerotized, with
a single large heavily sclerotized apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 1-6.
PUPA (fig. 43). Abdomen: about 3.9 mm. Trumpet: 0.60 mm. Paddle: 1.17
mm. Cephalothorax: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair 5-
C moderately developed, short to moderately long, reaching 0.22-0.35 distance
from its base to base of trumpet. Trumpet: Amber or very light brown to light
brown, extreme base and sometimes apex darker. Broadening gradually from base
to apex; tracheoid sculpturing relatively well developed in basal 0.13-0.17; retic-
ulate sculpturing strong. Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented, lighter pos-
teriorly. Tergite II usually with 1 or 2 strong transverse ridges anteriorly, tergite
III and sometimes IV and V with 1 strong transverse ridge anteriorly, tergites
VI and VII usually without transverse ridge. Hair 1-I]-IV moderately to strongly
developed, usually becoming longer and stronger on IV, usually double (1-4b) on
Zavortink: New World Aedes 85
II, single or double (1-3b) on III, usually single (single or double) on IV; hair
1-V weakly to strongly developed, single; 1-VI,VII weakly developed, single. Hair
2-III-V mesad or laterad of hair 1 of corresponding segment. Hair 5-IV,V_ 1.0-
1.5 length of corresponding segment; 5-VII short to moderately long, single, weak-
er and shorter or stronger and longer than 4-VII. Hair 6-III-VI moderately long
and strong, subequally developed or becoming slightly weaker posteriorly; 6-VII
shorter and finer than 6-III-VI. Hair 8-VI,VII ventral. Hair 9-III-VI relatively stout,
short to moderately long, subequal on all segments or slightly lengthened on VI,
cephalad or caudad of level of hair 6 on III, usually caudad of level of hair 6
of corresponding segment on IV-VI; hair 9-VII slightly to considerably cephalad
of caudolateral angle of segment, with 1 or 2 (1-3) moderately long primary
branches; 9-VIII at or slightly mesad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 2-
4 (1-6) long, strong primary branches. Hair 10-VI relatively close to 11-VI. Jer-
minal Segments: Male genital lobe large, about 1.5-1.7 length of tergite VIII.
Paddle: Length greater than width. Apex emarginate, subtruncate or rounded. Mid-
rib usually conspicuous to or nearly to apex; without wrinkled area near apex.
Long marginal spicules absent. Hair 1-P short, usually single (single or double).
LARVA (fig. 44). Head: 0.98 mm. Siphon: 1.02 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.28 mm.
Head: Lightly to moderately pigmented, lightened in ocular area, darkened pos-
teriorly. Labial plate distinctly narrowed anteriorly. Hair 1-C stout. Hairs 4,6-C
not near labrum. Hair 4-C moderately to strongly developed, 4-11b; mesad of
1-C and at the same level as 6-C or slightly cephalad or caudad of it. Hair 5-C
usually single (single or double); usually slightly mesad of 6-C. Hair 6-C single;
far laterad of 1-C. Hair 7-C 3-8b. Hair 15-C moderately long, 2,3b. Mental plate
with 8-11 (8-13) teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Shaft with few
to numerous small spicules. Hair 1-A moderately long, usually single (1-3b). Tho-
rax: Epidermis and fat body without conspicuous pigmentation. Integument with-
out spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P separate. Hair 1-M,T moderately long, branch-
ed. Hairs 4,5-P branched; 5-M single. Hair 11-P,M,I much shorter than 9-P. Hair
13-T usually moderately developed, usually 4-6b (3-9); subequal to or slightly
larger than 14-M. Hair 14-M moderately developed, usually 3-7b. Abdomen: Hair
1-I moderately to strongly developed, usually 5,6b (4-9); hair 1-IV,V strongly
developed, usually 3-5b. Hair 2-III-V mesad or laterad of hair 1 of correspond-
ing segment; single. Hair 3-VII moderately developed, short, usually single (single
or double). Hair 5-II-[V moderately to strongly developed, usually 3-6b (2-8).
Hair 6-III-V normally double (2,3b). Hair 9-III-V usually single (1-3b). Hair 11-1
moderately to strongly developed, usually 4-7b (3-9). Hair 12-I absent. Hair 13-l
moderately developed, usually 3-5b (2-8); hair 13-IV,V strongly developed, usu-
ally 3,4b (2-4); hair 13-VI weakly developed, 5-13b, cephalad of 10-VI. Segment
Vill: Hairs 1 and 2 separated. Hair 1 moderately to strongly developed, usually
3,4b (2-6). Comb scales moderate in size; with single long apical spine and basal
fringe; relatively few [8-10 (8-12)], usually in 1 regular slightly curved row, some-
times in irregular row. Siphon: Moderately to very strongly pigmented. Relatively
short to moderately long; index 2.3-4.5. Acus large. Pecten teeth with irregular
basal denticles; 12-20 (10-25) in more or less straight even row. Hair 1-S distad
of pecten; strongly developed, with 3 (3-5) spreading branches. Anal Segment:
Saddle moderate in size; without spines on caudal margin; moderately to strongly
pigmented. Hair 1-X moderately to strongly developed, usually 2,3b (2-4). Hair
2-X usually 4,5b (3-6). Hair 3-X single, but frequently with 1 to several conspic-
uous barbs or short branches near base on dorsal surface. Ventral brush (4-X)
86 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
moderately developed; usually with 7 pairs of hairs; all but most proximal 2-4
hairs from grid; hair 4a-X short, usually 3-5b; hairs 4b,4c-X double. Anal gills
sausage-shaped; dorsal and ventral subequal, about 2.5-6.5 times length of anal
saddle.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes muelleri is distinguished as follows: in the adult by (1)
the ornamentation of the mesoscutum, which has white to tannish-white scales
in distinct acrostichal, lateral prescutellar, anterior dorsocentral, posterior outer
dorsocentral, lateral marginal and posterior fossal lines or in distinct acrostichal
and lateral prescutellar lines and covering the entire lateral third of the mesoscu-
tum, (2) the extensive vestiture of scales and bristles on the pleuron,and by the
combination of (3) the long, slender proboscis, (4) the entirely dark scaled pro-
boscis, palpus, tibiae and tarsi, (5) the simple claws of the female, and (6) the
narrow curved scales between the eyes, on the vertex, all 3 scutellar lobes, the
entire posterior pronotum, and sometimes the paratergite; in the male genitalia
by the combination of (1) the single long, strong, apically hooked differentiated
seta in the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece, (2) the numerous scales among
the shorter setae on the tergal surface of the sidepiece, (3) the absence of a re-
trorse barb on the filament of the claspette, and (4) the usually more or less bar-
rel-shaped aedeagus; in the pupa by the combination of (1) the development of
hair 1-II-VII, which is usually moderately to strongly developed on II-IV or V
and usually very conspicuously more weakly developed on V or VI to VII, (2)
the relatively strongly developed and long 6-III-VI, (3) the strong and usually
elongate 9-III-VI, and (4) the relatively long, ovate paddle; and in the larva by
the combination of (1) the 8-10 (8-12) moderate-sized comb scales with a sin-
gle long apical spine that is fringed basally, (2) the ventral brush, which arises
from a grid, usually has 7 pairs of hairs, and has hair 4a-X short and 3-5b, (3)
the absence of 12-I, and (4) the short, usually single 3-VII.
Aedes muelleri is a very distinctive species in the adult stage. Dyar (1920:81-
82) described it in the subgenus Ochlerotatus (as Heteronycha) and later (Dyar,
1928:172) indicated its relationship to pullatus (Coquillett, 1904). Belkin and
McDonald (1957:190) retained muelleri in Ochlerotatus and assigned it to the
Pulchritarsis-Varipalpus Group on the basis of the larva and male genitalia. Arnell
and Nielsen (1972:4) thought that the similarities between the Varipalpus Group
and muelleri that led Belkin and McDonald to postulate a relationship between
these taxa might be due to convergence and stressed the many differences in
the adults as evidence for their conclusions. Throughout most of this study I
was also impressed by the numerous differences between the adults of muelleri
and the Varipalpus Group and doubted that these taxa were related. However,
I have come to agree fully with Belkin and McDonald and now believe that muel-
leri and the Varipalpus Group are collateral American developments from the
same stock as the Old World Pulchritarsis Group. Although the mesoscutal orn-
amentation of the females of muelleri is very different from that of species of
the Varipalpus Group which occur in the southwestern United States, it is not
much different from that of laguna Arnell and Nielsen, 1972 which occurs in
southern Baja California and is apparently the most primitive species of the Vari-
palpus Group. The pupa of muelleri is almost indistinguishable from that of vari-
palpus (Coquillett, 1902) and is very similar to the other species of the Vari-
palpus Group. The larva of muelleri differs from that of the Varipalpus Group
only in form of the comb scales, structure of the ventral brush, and develop-
ment of hairs 1,13-III-V. The distributions of muelleri and the Varipalpus Group
Zavortink: New World Aedes 87
are essentially complementary, which also suggests a close relationship between
them. The subgeneric placement of muelleri has never been challenged, largely
because the habitat of the immatures remained unknown and several features of
the female, such as the simple claws and large, prominent sternite VIII, passed
unnoticed until recently (Belkin and McDonald, 1957:190; McDonald, 1957a:505-
511). This has not been the case with the Varipalpus Group, which has been shuffled
back and forth between Finlaya and Ochlerotatus in recent times (see Arnell and
Nielsen, 1972:3-5). I am placing muelleri into a monotypic group, allying it with
the Pulchritarsis and Varipalpus Groups in the more inclusive Pulchritarsis Sec-
tion and leaving this assemblage in Ochlerotatus (sens. lat.) until the relation-
ships of the numerous other lineages presently included in this subgenus are work-
ed out and until the systematics of the Old World Pulchritarsis Group is put on
a par with that of its American counterparts.
Aedes muelleri, as I am interpreting it, is a highly variable species. In the adults,
apparently nongeographical variation includes the presence or absence of bristles
along the upper edge of the posterior pronotum and in the middle anterior por-
tion of the mesepimeron and the color of the scales in the fossal area, laterad
of the posterior outer dorsocentral scale line, and along the upper edge of the
posterior pronotum. Apparently geographical variation includes the presence of
numerous subspiracular bristles, the reduced number or absence of scales on the
paratergite and in the postcoxal area, the absence of a dorsal extension from the
subspiracular scale line, the purer white color of the light mesoscutal scales, and
the shorter and more sparsely bristled palpus of the male in some or all indi-
viduals of some Mexican populations. In the male genitalia the setae of the IX
tergite are longer, the setae of the apical half of the sternomesal surface of the
sidepiece are shorter and finer, and the aedeagus is narrower in the Texas pop-
ulations. In the pupa the pigmentation is stronger and the paddle longer in all
Mexican populations. And, in the larva, the siphon is longer and has more pec-
ten teeth in all Mexican populations.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of muelleri are usually found in treeholes; they
have also been found in artificial containers in Arizona and, on | occasion, in
the leaf axils of maguey (Agave) in Mexico. In Arizona the species occurs most
commonly in oak-pine forest and cottonwood (Populus) gallery forest at higher
elevations (1680 to 2320 meters), but it has been found in riparian woodland
and groves of oaks (Quercus) at moderate or even low elevations (as low as 1220
meters). It is associated with Ae. (Kompia) purpureipes, Ae. (Ochlerotatus) mont-
icola Belkin & McDonald, 1957 and Ae. (Protomacleaya) burgeri in the southern
part of the state and with Ae. (O.) varipalpus (Coquillett, 1902) in the northern
part. In Texas muelleri is common in the oak-pine forest at the higher elevations
(above 1770 meters) in the Chisos Mountains, but again it does occur in groves
of oaks at lower elevations (1400 meters). It is associated with only 1 other spe-
cies of Aedes in Texas, Ae. (Protomacleaya) brelandi. In Mexico muelleri has been
found in gallery forest of willow (Salix) or cottonwood, dense oak-pine forest
and relatively sparse oak-juniper scrub at higher elevations only (1900 to 2500
meters). It has been associated with the montane species Ae. (Protomacleaya)
schicki in the western part of the State of Durango. Females of muelleri are at-
tracted to and bite humans. Dyar (1922a:92) and McDonald (1957a:511) both
reported the collection of a single female biting during the day. I found the fe-
males to be common and irritating for a brief period before darkness in Cave
Creek Canyon, Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona, in late August 1969.
88 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 41). Aedes muelleri extends from northwestern Arizona,
southwestern New Mexico and southwestern Texas southward at least to the Fed-
eral District of Mexico. In the United States it occurs at elevations between 1220
and 2320 meters; in Mexico, between 1900 and 2500 meters. Material examined:
2250 specimens; 279 males, 341 females, 947 larvae, 683 pupae; 394 individual
rearings (255 larval, 120 pupal, 19 incomplete).
MEXICO. Distrito Federal: Mexico City, J. Miller, 1 F [USNM]. Mexico City (NW), 10 Nov
1955, W.E. Snow, 1 pF [USNM]. Durango: Durango (29 km E), 10 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink
and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 694), 1 M, 1 P [UCLA]. Durango (53 km W), 3 July 1967, G. Schroeder
(MEX 488), 2 IpM (488-10,14), 2 pF (488-100,101), 1 M gen; same data (MEX 489), 1 lpM
(489-10) [UCLA]. Navios (6 km E), 11 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX
696), 14 IpF (696-10-23), 1 M, 1 M gen, 2 P, 2 L; same data (MEX 697), 1 IpF (697-10)
[UCLA]. Hidalgo: Real del Monte, 11 May 1962, D. Peniche, 3 L [USNM]. Mexico: Zitacuaro
(45 km E), 3 Sept 1964, E. Fisher and D. Verity (MEX 167), 1 L; 23 July 1966, D. Verity
(MEX 394), 2 IpM (394-10,11), 1 IpF (394-12), 7 pM (394-16,17,21,100-103), 4 pF (394-13,
15,18,19), 1 lp (94-14), 4 M gen, 8 L [UCLA]. Zacatecas: Felipe Angeles, 9 June 1971, TJ.
Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 680), 1 lpM (680-10); same data (MEX 682), 4 IpM (682-
10,12,13,18), 6 IpF (682-11,14-17,19), 22 M, 1 M gen, 6 F, 29 P, 26 L; same data (MEX 683),
8 IpM (683-13-19,21), 7 IpF (683-10-12,20,22-24), 3 M, 1 M gen, 3 F, 14 P, 33 L [UCLA].
Rancho Grande, 10 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 685), 1 M; same data
(MEX 687), 4 lpM (687-10-12,14), 3 IpF (687-13,15,16), 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 P, 1 L [UCLA].
San Martin, 10 June 1971, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (MEX 690), 2 lpM (690-10,11), 1 L;
same data (MEX 691), 8 IpM (691-10,12-14,16-18,21), 3 IpF (691-11,15,19), 1 lp (691-20),
6 M, 1 M gen, 2 F, 7 P, 14 L [UCLA].
UNITED STATES. Arizona: Bisbee (4 km NW), 22 Mar 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 313),
3 IpM (313-10,11,16), 5 IpF (813-12-15,17), 2 lp (313-18,19), 9 M, 2 F, 3 M gen, 13 P, 22 L
[UCLA]. Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mts., Cochise Co., 5 Sept 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 339),
1 IpM (339-14), 1 IpF (339-18), 2 pM (339-31,114), 3 pF (339-30,112,113), 1 M, 1 M gen,
8 P, 1 L; same data (UCLA 340), 2 pF (340-100,101) [UCLA]. Cochise Stronghold Cmpg.,
Dragoon Mts., Cochise Co., 26 Aug 1954, J.F. Burger (UCLA 254), 7 M, 54 F, 53 P, 9 L;
4 Sept 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 327), 6 IpF (327-10-12,14-16), 5 pM (327-103,104,107,
108,110), 12 pF (327-20,24,100-102,105,106,109,111-114), 1 lp (327-13), 4 M, 10 F, 23 P,
11 L; same data (UCLA 328), 2 lpM (328-33,36), 1 lp (328-34), 1 M gen, 2 F, 2 P, 6 L; same data
(UCLA 329), 1 F; same data (UCLA 330), 4 lpF (330-15,17-19), 4 pM (330-102,104,109,110),
10 pF (330-100,101,103,105-108,112-114), 5 M, 1 F, 2 L; 22 Mar 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA
426), 5 IpM (426-11-14,18), 4 IpF (426-15-17,19); same data (UCLA 427), 11 M, 12 F, 24 P,
13 L [UCLA]. Hualpai Mts., Mohave Co., 4 Aug 1956, J.N. Belkin and W.A. McDonald (UCLA
210), 1 L [UCLA]. Kitt Peak, Quinlan Mts., Pima Co., 8 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA
631), 1 lpM (631-10), 2 IpF (631-11,12) [UCLA]. Lochiel (13 km E), Bodie Canyon, Santa
Cruz Co., 27 Dec 1969, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 559), 2 L; same data (UCLA
562), 3 IpM (562-41-43), 8 IpF (562-45 ,49,51,55,56,66,69,78), 1 pM (562-102), 1 lp (562-48),
8 M, 2 F, 15 P, 152 L; same data (UCLA 567), 1 lpM (567-22), 8 IpF (567-21,25,27,28,30,31,
33,35), 5 pM (567-100-104), 6 M, 19 P, 171 L [UCLA]. Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mts., Santa
Cruz Co. or Pima Co., 25 Aug 1954, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 140), 1 F; 18 Aug 1955, W.A.
McDonald (UCLA 173), 2 IpF (173-203,206), 9 pM (173-208,209,211,212,216,217,221,223,
224), 5 pF (173-210,214,215,218,219), 3 M, 9 M gen, 2 F, 4 P, 2 L; 13 or 14 Aug 1960,
C.L. Hogue (UCLA 232), 2 M, 8 F [UCLA]. Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Mts., Pima Co., 29 Dec
1969, T.J. Zavortink and L.T. Nielsen (UCLA 551), 1 L; same data (UCLA 568), 1 L [UCLA].
Onion Saddle, Chiricahua Mts., Cochise Co., 6 Sept 1966, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 344), 3 pM
(344-101,102,104), 2 pF (344-100,103), 1 Ip (344-10), 1 M gen, 1 F, 2 P [UCLA]. Patagonia
(3-6 km WSW), 14 Sept 1968, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 458), 2 IpF (458-20,21); same data (UCLA
460), 2 IpM (460-11,13), 2 IpF (460-14,15); 13 Sept 1968, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 480), 2 lpM
(480-12,14), 2 IpF (480-10,13), 1 lp (480-11) [UCLA]. Williams, 4 Aug 1956, J.N. Belkin and
W.A. McDonald (UCLA 212), 19 IpM (212-115,118,120-122,128,130,158,169,180,185,187,191,
Zavortink: New World Aedes 89
192,195,196,201,205,216), 45 IpF (212-113,117,123,125-127,129,131,133-136,138-142,159,167,
171-173,175-177,181-184,188-190,193,194,200,202,204,207-209,211,213-215,219), 17 pM (212-
101,105-112,144,146,147,150,152,156,157,203), 2 pF (212-103,104), 6 Ip (212-114,119,124,
132,137,206), 4 M gen, 4 P, 35 L; same data (UCLA 214), 1 IpM (214-101), 2 IpF (214-102,
103), 1 pM (214-108), 5 L; 5 Aug 1956, J.N. Belkin and W.A. McDonald (UCLA 215), 4 lpM
(215-112,113,117,124), 7 IpF (215-109-111,119,121-123), 3 pM (215-114-116), 6 pF (215-101-
105,108), 1 IM (215-118), 1 lp (215-120), 1 F, 1 M gen, 5 P, 43 L [UCLA]. Texas: Alpine
(30 km S), 7 Sept 1957, O.P. Breland, 3 M, 3 F, 4 M gen, 4 P, 4 L [UCLA]. Chisos Mts., Big Bend
National Park, Brewster Co., 31 Aug 1969, T.J. and J.A. Zavortink (UCLA 602), 6 L; same data
(UCLA 603), 6 IpM (603-10-15), 6 IpF (603-16-19,24,25), 3 pM (603-105-107), 4 L; same data
(UCLA 604), 3 IpM (604-10,11,13), 8 lpF (604-14-21), 1 pM (604-100), 1 lp (604-12), 1 P,7L;
same data (UCLA 607), 1 pF (607-100), 1 L; 1 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 609), 1 lpM
(609-14), 7 IpF (6009-15-21), 5 pM (609-106,107,109-111), 23 M, 2 M gen, 12 F, 55 P, 52 L;
same data (UCLA 610), 4 IpF (610-12-15), 1 pM (610-100), 3 M, 3 P; same data (UCLA 611),
1 IpM (611-10), 3 IpF (611-16,19,20), 5 L; same data (UCLA 613), 1 lpF (613-13), 1 pM
(613-101), 1 P, 14 L [UCLA]. Fort Davis (6 km W), Davis Mts. State Park, 2 Sept 1969, T-.J.
Zavortink (UCLA 615), 2 IpM (615-10,11), 1 Ip (615-12), 4 L; same data (UCLA 617), 1 IpF
(617-13), 1 pF (617-17); same data (UCLA 618), 1 IpF (618-10) [UCLA]. Fort Davis (19 km
NE), Limpia Canyon, 28 Aug 1969, T.J. and J.A. Zavortink (UCLA 600), 1 pM (600-101)
[UCLA].
Additional Records From the Literature
UNITED STATES. New Mexico: Animas (24 km S), Cat Walk Cmpg. (8 km E Glenwood)
and Reserve (Nielsen, Linam, Arnell and Zavortink, 1968:362-363).
ATROPALPUS SECTION
FEMALES. Dark scales of proboscis, palpus, legs, wings and abdomen with very
slight metallic coppery, green, blue or violet reflections. Head: Eyes narrowly to
broadly separated above antennae, the resulting space with narrow curved scales
and elongate setae. Integument light to dark brown. Frontal bristles numerous.
Orbital bristles moderately numerous, 8-15 pairs, varied in development. Vertex
usually without erect scales, with decumbent scales broad and flat except along
midline where they are narrow and curved. Occiput with numerous erect scales
and narrow curved scales. Orbital line of narrow curved scales developed. Dorso-
lateral, lateral and ventral surfaces with broad flat scales. Clypeus maderately large,
bare. Proboscis slender, longer than forefemur; entirely dark scaled; with a few
basal bristles. Palpus short, about 0.17-0.20 length of proboscis; 4-segmented, seg-
ment 4 minute to moderate in size; segments 1-3 with bristles; usually entirely
dark scaled. Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus with moderate to large patch
of small flat scales, with fine setae or with a mixture of scales and setae; flagel-
lar segment 1 longer than 2, slightly swollen, with patch of scales; flagellar seg-
ments 2-13 usually with 6 moderate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar seg-
ments 3-5 slightly longer than preceding segment, segments 5-12 subequal in length.
Thorax: Integument tan to dark brown or blackish. Acrostichal and anterior dorso-
central bristles well developed only on anterior promontory, absent or few and
weak on disc; posterior dorsocentral bristles absent to well developed; prescutellar
and supraalar bristles numerous and well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and
posterior fossal bristles present, strongly to weakly developed, or absent; | para-
scutellar bristle present, strongly to weakly developed, or absent. Scutellum with
5-10 strong bristles on midlobe, 5-16 on lateral lobe. Mesoscutum completely cov-
90 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
ered with narrow curved scales of various sizes except for normal anterior inner
dorsocentral and median and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; ornamentation varied.
Scutellar lobes with narrow curved scales of varied color. Paratergite narrow, with
or without scales. Apn not enlarged. Ppn separated from mesoscutum by strong
suture. Meron large. Pleural bristles on apn, ppn, ppl, psp, pra, stp and upper
mep; stp bristles usually numerous, in continuous row from near psp to below
level of lower edge of mep; ssp and lower mep bristles absent. Apn with predom-
inantly semierect, narrow curved and broad scales; ppn with large area covered
with narrow curved and sometimes broad flat scales; broad flat appressed and
semierect scales on ppl, in long ssp line, in 3 patches on stp, 1 below pra, 1 in
middle and | above midcoxa, and usually in separate or joined upper and mid-
dle mep patches; pcx and psp with or without scales; pst, hypostigial area and
metameron without scales. Legs: Hindcoxa smaller than or subequal in size to
midcoxa, its base far below upper margin of meron. Legs short to moderately
long, the forefemur 1.06-1.37 times distance from top of thorax to tip of mid-
coxa. Forecoxa with light or light and dark scales; midcoxa and sometimes hind-
coxa with light scales. Forefemur and midfemur predominantly dark scaled, with
light scales in narrow basal band and in variable streaks on posterior, dorsal and/or
ventral surfaces. Hindfemur dark scaled with variable light markings basally. Knee
spots very small to moderately large, dingy-white to silver, subequal on all legs.
Tibiae dark scaled with light scales in narrow basal band or ring and sometimes
in very narrow to moderately broad apical patch or band; sometimes pale scales
scattered or streaked on posterior and/or ventral surface of all tibiae. Tarsi pre-
dominantly dark scaled with at least proximal segments of all legs with basal or
basal and apical light patch, band or ring. Claws of foreleg and midleg with acute
submedian tooth; claws of hindleg simple. Wing: Dark scaled except usually for
patch or short line of white scales at base of costa. Plume scales on dorsum of
veins Rs, R,+3, R2., R3, middle portion of M and apical portion of 1A. Haltere:
Scales white and/or dark. Abdomen: Tergite I with numerous scales middorsally.
Laterotergite with or without scales. Tergites VI and VII completely scaled. Out-
standing scales absent. Ornamentation of tergites and sternites varied.
FEMALE GENITALIA (figs. 48,51). Segment VIII: Tergite narrowed apically,
length along midline about 0.57-0.82 of tergite VII; distal 0.57-0.82 with scales
and bristles. Sternite relatively short; about 1.2-1.4 length of tergite, slightly broad-
er distally; distal margin distinctly convex; all but lateral and basal areas with
scales and bristles, the scales at least as numerous as bristles; bristles more num-
erous along midline and distal margin, predominantly moderately developed. Ter-
gite IX: Reduced, consisting of a pair of separate dorsolateral plates; maximum
length of plate about 0.15-0.22 length of tergite VIII; plate weakly sclerotized,
without setae. Insula: Moderately sclerotized; connected to sigma; with 2 or 3
pairs of moderately developed setae. Cercus: Relatively short, length about 0.62-
0.71 of tergite VIII; compressed; apex rounded to acute in lateral view; bristles
numerous apically, the largest moderately developed; scales present or absent. Post-
genital Plate: Moderately long and broad, length about 0.37-0.50 of tergite VIII;
index about 1.3-1.4; apex slightly to conspicuously emarginate in ventral view;
distal portion with numerous weakly developed bristles and 1 pair of elongate
moderately developed bristles; basal median longitudinal apodeme not developed,
but with more strongly sclerotized depression at base. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized.
Atrial plates small to large, rather weakly sclerotized. Sigma: Connected to cowl;
moderately sclerotized. Basal portion of spermathecal duct usually strongly scle-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 91
rotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized, more or less spherical, subequal (flu-
viatilis) or 1 greatly enlarged (atropalpus).
MALES. Similar to females except for sexual characters. Head: Proboscis slen-
der. Palpus variable, about 0.66-0.95 length of proboscis; 5-segmented; segments
2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.58-0.71 length of palpus; segment 4
short, 0.14-0.19 length of palpus; segment 5 short, 0.11-0.16 length of palpus;
palpus slender except for slightly swollen apex of segment 3 and sometimes swol-
len segment 4; apex of segment 3 very slightly upturned, segments 4 and 5 very
slightly drooping; apex of segment 3 and all of segments 4 and 5 with bristles;
entirely dark scaled or with light patch at base of some segments. Antenna shorter
than proboscis; torus much enlarged, without scales or with an inconspicuous patch
of small scales; flagellum strongly plumose, segments 1-12 with very numerous
long bristles; flagellar segment 1 slightly elongate, with scales; flagellar segments
12 and 13 elongate, more or less subequal or penultimate longer, the 2 com-
bined slightly shorter than or subequal to total length of first 11 segments. Legs:
Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw with long blunt sub-
median tooth and acute basal tooth, smaller claw with acute subbasal tooth. Claws
of hindleg small, simple. Abdomen: Apical segments and genitalia not bent ventrad.
MALE GENITALIA. Various shades of straw-yellow, tan and brown; apex of
paraproct blackish. Segment VIII: Tergite long, 1.08-1.40 length of sternite; ex-
serted, apical 0.54-0.69 scaled. Segment IX: Poorly developed dorsally, the ter-
gite short to moderately long; middorsal portion of tergite weakly sclerotized, at
level of base of sidepiece or caudad of it; tergite without lobes or setae; sternite
large, with 3-12 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, conical; mesal surface
membranous from base to apex; basal tergomesal area slightly to conspicuously swol-
len, with a clump of setae; apical lobe not developed; median sternomesal tuft
and sclerite absent; sternomesal surface without long broad striated scales; dorso-
mesal surface with short or short and long setae; dorsolateral, lateral and ventral
surfaces with numerous strong setae and scales; setae of sternomesal surface spec-
ialized, enlarged. Claspette: Well developed; stem moderately long to long, straight
to slightly curved mesad in dorsal aspect, sometimes strongly curved dorsad api-
cally; spiculose; with weakly developed setae and sometimes 1 specialized seta near
apex; filament long, terete to flattened, curved, without ridge or retrorse barb on
convex side, sometimes expanded and striate. Clasper: Simple, long; broadest at
or slightly beyond base, distal portion strongly curved; with or without ridges or
wrinkles; with or without. spicules; 1 or 2 setae near apex on outer surface, |
near apex of inner surface; apical spiniform short, 0.19-0.31 length of clasper.
Phallosome: Aedeagus small, without teeth; base parallel-sided, apex expanded,
rounded. Proctiger: Strongly developed; not unusually long in dorsal aspect, the
basolateral sclerotization vertical; paraproct well sclerotized, with 1 large heavily
sclerotized apical tooth; cercal setae fine, short, 3-5.
PUPAE. Cephalothorax: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter ventrally. Hair
5-C weakly to moderately developed, short, reaching 0.25-0.40 distance from its
base to base of trumpet. Trumpet: Very light brown to dark brown. Broadening
from base to apex; tracheoid sculpturing poorly developed in basal 0.09-0.16; re-
ticulate sculpturing strong. Abdomen: Weakly to strongly pigmented, sometimes
lighter posteriorly. More anterior of tergites II-VII sometimes with a transverse
ridge near level of hair 0. Hair 1-II-[V moderately developed, with 4-39b on II,
1-15b on III and 1-6b on IV; hair 1-V-VII weakly to moderately developed, 1-
6b on V, 1-4b on VI and VII. Hair 2-III-V mesad of hair 1 of corresponding seg-
92 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
ment. Hair 5-IV,V 0.9-2.2 length of corresponding segment; 5-VII short to mod-
erately long, 1-4b, shorter and usually finer than 4-VII. Hair 6-III,[V and some-
times V usually moderately long, fine; 6-VI and sometimes V usually slightly
longer and stronger than 6-III,[V; hair 6-VII short to moderately long, fine. Hair
8-VI,VII dorsal or ventral. Hair 9-III-VI short to moderately long, fine, subequal
on all segments or slightly longer on VI, cephalad or caudad of level of hair 6
of corresponding segment; 9-VII cephalad of caudolateral angle of segment, with
2-5 (2-8) moderately long primary branches; 9-VIII usually mesad of caudolat-
eral angle of segment, with 4-12 moderately long primary branches. Hair 10-VI
relatively close to 11-VI. Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe moderately large
to large, about 1.0-1.9 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Very broad, width subequal
to length. Apex rounded to deeply emarginate. Midrib conspicuous to or nearly
to apex; sometimes with conspicuous wrinkles along midrib near apex. Long mar-
ginal spicules absent. Hair 1-P usually long and single.
LARVAE. Head: Lightly to strongly pigmented, the pattern varied. Labial plate
narrowed anteriorly. Hair 1-C fine. Hairs 4,6-C removed from labrum. Hair 4-C
weakly developed, 2-6b; mesad or laterad of 1-C and usually caudad of level of
6-C. Hair 5-C 1-5b, mesad or laterad of 6-C. Hair 6-C 1-3b, laterad of 1-C. Hair
7-C 2-9b. Hair 15-C short, 1-6b. Mental plate with 7-12 teeth on each side of
median tooth. Antenna: Shaft usually with small spicules. Hair 1-A long, usu-
ally 2-4b (1-4). Thorax: Epidermis moderately pigmented. Integument without
spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5,6-P sometimes joined; tubercle of 7-P separate. Hair
1-M moderately long to long, single or branched; 1-T short to moderately long,
single to branched. Hair 4-P usually single (single or double). Hair 5-P 1-3b; hair
5-M single or double. Hair 11-P,M,T much shorter than 9-P. Hairs 13-T and 14-
M weakly to moderately developed, 3-30b. Abdomen: Hair 1-I weakly developed,
usually 5-13b (4-20); hair 1-IV,V weakly to strongly developed, 1-5b. Hair 2-
III-V mesad of hair 1 of corresponding segment; single. Hair 3-VII weakly to
moderately developed, short, usually 2,3b (1-4). Hair 5-II-[V weakly developed,
usually 2-6b (1-7). Hair 6-III-V 1-6b. Hair 9-III-V usually single (single or dou-
ble). Hair 11-1 weakly developed, 1-5b. Hair 12-I present. Hair 13-I weakly de-
veloped, usually single or double (1-3b); hair 13-I1V,V strongly developed, 1-4b;
hair 13-VI weakly developed, 3-22b, cephalad of level of 10-VI. Segment VIII:
Hairs 1 and 2 relatively close together. Hair 1 moderately developed, usually sin-
gle or double (1-3b). Comb scales small; cleft and/or fringed; many (7-110) in
patch. Siphon: Lightly to strongly pigmented, yellowish to brown, except for
slightly darker apex and much darker basal band. Short to moderately long; in-
dex 1.9-3.1. Acus present, sometimes weakly developed. Pecten teeth with 1-6
basal denticles; 9-28 in a more or less straight row; apical teeth sometimes de-
tached. Hair 1-S arising within or beyond pecten; moderately developed, 4-10b.
Anal Segment: Saddle small to moderate; without spines on caudal margin; lightly
to moderately pigmented, yellowish to brownish. Hair 1-X weakly developed, short,
usually single or double (1-3b). Hair 2-X usually 5-8b (4-11). Hair 3-X single.
Ventral brush (4-X) moderately to strongly developed, usually with 6 (5-7) pairs
of hairs; all hairs or all but most proximal 1 or 2 hairs arising from well developed
grid; hair 4a-X long, 2-7b; hairs 4b,4c-X 2-8b. Anal gills tapered distally; dorsal
and ventral usually subequal in length, 2.0-5.0 of anal saddle.
DISCUSSION. The Atropalpus Section is characterized as follows: in the adults
by the combination of (1) the broad flat scales on all but the median portion of
the vertex, (2) the presence of narrow curved scales and numerous bristles be-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 93
tween the eyes, (3) the usual absence of acrostichal and anterior dorsocentral
bristles from the disc of the mesoscutum, (4) the narrow curved scales on all 3
scutellar lobes, (5) the absence of scales from the paratergite and laterotergite
or their restriction to the lower edge of these areas, (6) the scaling of the pos-
terior pronotum, which is usually largely covered with narrow curved scales or
narrow curved and broad flat scales, (7) the slender proboscis, and (8) the basal-
ly or basally and apically banded tarsi; in the male genitalia by the combination
of (1) the absence of lobes or setae on tergite IX, (2) the clump of few to num-
erous enlarged setae in the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece, (3) the absence
of a retrorse barb on the claspette filament, (4) the presence of 1 or 2 setae near
the apex of the outer surface of the clasper, and (5) the nearly vertical basolateral
sclerotization of the proctiger; in the pupae by the combination of (1) the very
broad paddle, (2) the fine, moderately long branches of hair 1-II, (3) the posi-
tion of 2-III-V, which is mesad of hair 1 of the corresponding segment, (4) the
fine 9-III-VI, and (5) the relatively numerous (4-12), moderately long primary
branches of 9-VII; and, in the larvae by the combination of (1) the fine hair 1-
C, (2) the weakly developed 1,11,13-I, 1-X and 5-II-IV, (3) the position of 2-
III-V, which is mesad of hair 1 of the corresponding segment, (4) the small to
moderate-sized anal saddle, (5) the development of the ventral brush, which us-
ually has 6 pairs of hairs (5-7) from a grid, and (6) the 4 subequal, moderately
long to long, tapered anal gills.
I am tentatively placing the Atropalpus Section in Ochlerotatus (sens. lat.) large-
ly on the basis of features of the immature stages. The affinities of this section
and the rank at which it should be recognized cannot be determined until this
composite subgenus is revised.
The Atropalpus Section contains 2 groups, the boreal bitypic Atropalpus Group
and the austral monotypic Fluvialitis Group, which are easily separated in all
Stages.
The immature stages of all species in this section are largely restricted to rock-
holes, rockpools and those artificial containers in which the composition of the
water is similar to that of the natural habitats.
The Atropalpus Section extends from Canada to Argentina and Brazil, but is
absent from the West Indies. The 2 included groups overlap in Central America.
KEYS TO GROUPS
ADULTS
1. Outer surface of hindcoxa with large patch of scales; paratergite and latero-
tergite bare; hindtarsal segment 5 usually entirely light scaled dorsally
PARES CPerraraed ee S Be RP O NN aine Meg wt alll er SIP RIOR Po 2) . Atropalpus Group
Outer surface of hindcoxa bare; paratergite and laterotergite usually scaled;
hindtarsal segment 5 entirely dark scaled or with a small basal light patch
(19. Fataeilis) 3: . Rcctatenne Bliledeaie schadade | Meier. at ROL aroun
MALE GENITALIA
1. Basal tergomesal area of sidepiece with numerous enlarged setae; claspette
filament terete ro ee eee. a eo oP Aopalgs arene
94 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Basal tergomesal area of sidepiece with few enlarged setae; claspette filament
usually flattened, sometimes broadened (19. fluviatilis) . .Fluviatilis Group
PUPAE
1. Paddle usually deeply emarginate at apex; hair 5-IV,V about 0.9-1.2 length
of corresponding tergite; male genital lobe 1.6-1.9 length of tergite VIII
ait . Atropalpus Group
Paddle at lis ounded otis slightly oneCane Ss at apex; hair 5-IV,V
about 1.3-2.2 length of corresponding tergite; male genital lobe 1.0-1.2
length of tergite VIII (19. fluviatilis) . . . . . . . . .Fluviatilis Group
LARVAE
1. Distal pecten teeth oe detached; hair 5-C single; 6-III,[V usually 4,5b
(276) 5 OS eas Atropalpus Group
Distal pecten teeth more or less eek spaced: hair 5-C 3-5b; hair 6-III-IV
usually single or double (1-3b) (19. fluviatilis). . . . . Fluviatilis Group
ATROPALPUS GROUP
FEMALES. Head: Eyes narrowly to broadly separated above antennae. Orbital
bristles moderately numerous, 11-15 pairs, not obviously separated into mesal and
lateral groups by their strength or direction of projection. Ornamentation of head
varied. Proboscis much longer than forefemur. Torus with moderate-sized patch
of scales, with fine setae, or with mixture of scales and setae; flagellar segment
1 with light or dark scales. Thorax: Integument varied. Acrostichal and anterior
dorsocentral bristles absent from disc or few and weak; posterior dorsocentral bris-
tles well developed; humeral, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles pres-
ent or absent; parascutellar bristle sometimes absent. Mesoscutum with background
of very small to small scales, uniform or varicolored dark bronzy-brown to coppery-
brown, yellow or golden, with a conspicuous to inconspicuous pattern of larger,
lighter (white, cream, dingy, yellow or light golden) scales in complete or vestig-
ial longitudinal lines or patches, as follows: (1) median patch on anterior pro-
montory, (2) broad anterior lateral more or less crescent-shaped mark formed
from joined lateral prescutal and posterior fossal lines, (3) narrow posterior outer
dorsocentral line, (4) usually broad supraalar line, and (5) separate or joined an-
terior and lateral prescutellar patches. Scutellar scales white, yellowish, golden or
brown. Paratergite bare. Apn scales white to dingy-white; ppn with white to yel-
lowish or dingy-yellow narrow curved scales along upper margin, at least a few
dark broad flat scales on disc and white to dingy-white broad flat scales below
ppn bristles and sometimes in upper anterior portion; pleural patches white to
silver-white; ssp line usually not broadened or extended dorsad anteriorly; psp
with scales; pcx membrane and adjacent ridge without scales. Legs: Outer sur-
face of hindcoxa with white scales. Forefemur and midfemur usually with light
scales in long streak on posterior surface and shorter streak at base of dorsal
and/or ventral surface; hindfemur varied. Knee spots moderately large. Tibiae with
light scales in very narrow to moderately broad apical patch or band. Foretarsus
with white scales in narrow ring or band at base of segment 1, in narrow band
or patch over joint between segments | and 2 and rarely in smaller dorsal patch
Zavortink: New World Aedes 95
over joint between segments 2 and 3; midtarsus with white scales in narrow to
moderately broad band or ring at base of segment 1, in narrow to moderately
broad ring or band over joint between segments 1 and 2 and in smaller band
or dorsal patch over joint between segments 2 and 3 and sometimes 3 and 4;
hindtarsus with white scales in moderately broad to broad ring or band at base
of segment 1, in moderately broad to broad ring over joint between segments |
and 2, in progressively narrower rings or bands over joints between segments 2
and 3 and 3 and 4, at apex of segment 4 and covering all of segment 5. Wing:
Costa with patch or short line of white scales at base. Haltere: Scales white or
white and dark. Abdomen: Laterotergite bare. Tergites II-VII dark scaled with
white scales usually in broad basal band that is widened laterally, white scaling
sometimes reduced to basolateral patches; tergite II white scaled to apex laterally.
Sternites varying from predominantly light scaled with small apicolateral dark patch
on distal segments to light scaled with complete broad apical dark band.
MALES. Similar to females except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus about
0.66-0.87 length of proboscis; segment 4 slender; apex of segment 3 and all of
segments 4 and 5 with few bristles; entirely dark scaled. Torus with or without
scales; flagellar segments 12 and 13 subequal in length. Wing: Costa sometimes
without light scales at base.
MALE GENITALIA. Sidepiece: Relatively long; basal tergomesal area slightly
swollen, with a clump of moderately numerous to very numerous enlarged setae;
setae of sternomesal surface strong, straight or curved dorsad. Claspette: Stem long;
with 1-3 weakly developed setae near base and 1 normal or specialized seta near
apex; filament terete, never expanded or striate. Clasper: Broadest slightly beyond
base.
PUPAE. Cephalothorax: Moderately to strongly pigmented, lighter ventrally.
Trumpet: Uniformly light brown to dark brown. Abdomen: Moderately to strong-
ly pigmented, lighter posteriorly. Hair 1-II,II] moderately developed, with variable
number of fine branches (4-39 on II and 3-15 on III); hair 1-[V moderately de-
veloped, usually 3-5b (2-6); hair 1-V weakly to moderately developed, usually
2-5b (2-6); hair 1-VI,VII weakly developed, usually single or double (1-4b). Hair
5-IV,V 0.9-1.9 length of corresponding segment. Hair 8-VI,VII usually ventral.
Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe large, about 1.6-1.9 length of tergite VIII.
Paddle: Apex usually deeply emarginate. Sometimes with conspicuous wrinkles
along midrib near apex.
LARVAE. Head: Hair 5-C single, slightly mesad or laterad of 6-C. Hair 6-C
single. Hair 7-C 3-5b (2-7). Thorax: Hairs 1-3-P not arising from an alveolar plate.
Hairs 5,6-P arising from separate tubercles. Hair 1-M moderately long to long,
branched. Hair 5-P usually 2,3b (1-3). Hairs 13-T and 14-M weakly to moder-
ately developed, 3-6b (3-8). Abdomen: Hair 1-IV,V weakly to moderately de-
veloped, usually 2-4b (2-5). Hair 6-III,IV usually 4,5b (2-6); hair 6-V usually 2-
4b (2-6). Hair 13-IV,V usually 3,4b (2-4). Segment VIII: Comb scales usually
evenly fringed; 7-90 in number. Siphon: Short; index 1.9-2.7. Acus sometimes
weakly developed and/or detached. Distal 1-5 pecten teeth detached. Hair 1-S
arising within pecten. Anal Segment: Saddle small. Ventral brush moderately de-
veloped; hair 4a-X usually 2,3b (2-4); hair 4b-X usually 2,3b (2-5); hair 4c-X us-
ually 3,4b (3-5).
DISCUSSION. The Atropalpus Group is easily distinguished from the Fluviatilis
Group in all stages, as follows: in the adults most conspicuously by (1) the pres-
ence of well developed posterior dorsocentral bristles, (2) the usual presence of
96 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
scales on the postspiracular area and the outer surface of the hindcoxa, (3) the
usual absence of scales on the paratergite, postcoxal area and adjacent ridge, and
laterotergite, (4) the larger light tarsal markings that involve both ends of the
segments, (5) the usually white scaled hindtarsal segment 5, and (6) the sparse
vestiture of bristles on palpal segment 4 of the male; in the male genitalia by
(1) the more numerous enlarged setae in the basal tergomesal area of the side-
piece, and (2) the terete claspette filament; in the pupae by (1) the shorter hair
5-IV,V which is only 0.9-1.2 times as long as the corresponding tergite, (2) the
larger male genital lobe, which is 1.6-1.9 times longer than tergite VIII, and (3)
the usually deeply emarginate apex of the paddle; and in the larvae most conspic-
uously by (1) the single hair 5-C, (2) the 4 or 5-branched (2-6) hair 6-III,IV,
(3) the 3- or 4-branched (2-4) hair 13-IV,V, (4) the usually evenly fringed comb
scales, and (5) the strongly detached distal pecten teeth that extend far beyond
1-S.
I have concluded that the Atropalpus Group has been derived from the Flu-
viatilis Group because of the reduced ventral brush (fewer branches in each hair)
and reduced extent of sclerotization (smaller anal saddle, absence of plates at base
of hairs 1-3-P and 5,6-P) in the larvae of the former and its more boreal distri-
bution.
I am not following the recent treatment of the Atropalpus Group by O’Meara
and Craig (1970a,b), who recognized 4 subspecies, atropalpus atropalpus, atropal-
pus epactius, atropalpus nielseni and atropalpus perichares. Instead, I am recog-
nizing 2 species, atropalpus and epactius, and am synonymizing nielseni and peri-
chares with the latter. Aedes atropalpus and epactius differ in several character-
istics of the adult, male genitalia and larva, as indicated in the keys below and
the systematics section of each species. The differences in the male genitalia are
particularly reliable for separating the species.
The immatures of both species in the Atropalpus Group are characteristically
found in rockholes and rockpools. Females of both species readily bite humans.
This group extends from southeastern Canada to Panama. The 2 included spec-
ies are allopatric.
KEYS TO SPECIES
ADULTS
1. Eyes narrowly to moderately separated above antennae, the shortest distance
between them 1.0-2.0 times the diameter of 1 ommatidium; anterior lat-
eral light-scaled crescent of mesoscutum (lateral prescutal, posterior fos-
sal and sometimes fossal scales) narrow to broad, usually white or whit-
ish, if yellowish then background scales of mesoscutum usually entirely
or predominantly yellow or golden; female with 1 or more moderately
to strongly developed posterior fossal bristles; male with palpus 0.74-0.87
length of proboscis . . . . . 17. epactius
Eyes broadly separated above fee the ‘oneal Gistanc: between them
2.5-4.0 times the diameter of 1 oniiatidiun: anterior lateral light-scaled
crescent of mesoscutum very broad, extending mesad to dorsocentral area,
yellowish-cream to pale golden, and background scales of mesoscutum en-
tirely or predominantly dark bronzy-brown; female without posterior fos-
1908.
192%.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 97
sal bristles; male with — 0.66-0.72 eens of eget (fig. 48)
We at bi ka me : é . 18. atropalpus
MALE GENITALIA
Specialized setae of basal tergomesal area of sidepiece very numerous, ar-
ranged in a nearly circular to broadly elliptical patch of 5 or 6 rows, the
setae of the more distal rows nearly as long and strong as setae of basal
rows; many setae of mesal half of tergal surface of sidepiece elongate and
directed dorsad or dorsomesad; apical seta of claspette stem long, mod-
erately strong, strongly curved dorsad (fig. 46) ... . . . .17. epactius
Specialized setae of basal tergomesal area of sidepiece moderately numerous,
arranged in a narrowly elliptical patch of 2-4 rows, the setae of the more
distal 1 or 2 rows fine and shortened; setae of mesal half of tergal surface
of sidepiece predominantly short, fine and curved toward apex of side-
piece; apical seta of claspette stem relatively short, fine, and straight or
slightly curved dorsad (fig. 49). . . ....... .. . .18. atropalpus
LARVAE
Antenna and anterior portion of head capsule concolorous with or slightly
darker or lighter than antennal prominence; comb scales usually moder-
ately numerous, 18-34 (7-41); base of siphon of mature larva usually not
irregularly sclerotized ventrally between the 2 rows of pecten teeth, so that
there is usually no extensive basal ventral membranous area; hair 1-M usually
weakly to moderately developed, usually short to ene long (fig. 47)
tre .17. epactius
Auteons and aaicnor portion of head eapaus much 1 more strongly pigmented
than antennal prominence; comb scales usually numerous, 34-62 (24-90);
base of siphon of mature larva irregularly sclerotized ventrally between the
2 rows of pecten teeth, so that there is an extensive basal ventral mem-
branous area; hair 1-M moderately to betes developed, long (fig. 50)
Ai cic mete Aatineen cite Went webuanet br are . 18. atropalpus
17. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) epactius Dyar & Knab
Figs. 45-47
Aedes epactius Dyar and Knab, 1908:53-54. TYPE: Lectotype female (416.25), Cor-
doba, Veracruz, Mexico, larva from rockhole, 18 Feb 1908, F. Knab [USNM; selection
of Stone and Knight, 1956:217]. Synonymized with atropalpus by Dyar (1928:213-
214); considered a variety of atropalpus by Knight and Marks (1952:546); elevated
to specific rank by Lane (1953:691); resynonymized with atropalpus by Carpenter and
LaCasse (1955:253); treated as a subspecies of atropalpus by O’Meara and Craig (1970a:
1398).
Aedes (Culiselsa) perichares Dyar, 1921b:36. TYPE: Lectotype female, Ciruelas, Ala-
juela, Costa Rica, larva from rockhole, 29 Oct 1920, A. Alfaro [USNM; selection of
Stone and Knight, 1956:223]. Synonymized with fluviatilis (Lutz, 1904) by Bonne
and Bonne-Wepster (1925:415,418); resurrected by Dyar (1928:221); synonymized with
atropalpus by Edwards (1932:153); synonymized with epactius by Knight and Marks
(1952:546); treated as a subspecies of atropalpus by O’Meara and Craig (1970a: 1399);
NEW SYNONYMY.
98 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
1970. Aedes (Finlaya) atropalpus nielseni O’Meara and Craig in Carpenter, 1970:53 (June).
NOMEN NUDUM.
1970. Aedes atropalpus nielseni O’Meara and Craig, 1970a:1399 (Sept). TYPE: Holotype fe-
male, along Colorado River near Moab, Grand Co., Utah, United States of America,
larva from rockpool, Oct 1968, L.T. Nielsen [USNM]. NEW SYNONYMY.
Aedes (Finlaya) epactius of Lane (1953:691-692).
Aedes epactius of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:642-644).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) epactius of Dyar (1918:74,79; 1922b:85).
Aedes (Finlaya) atropalpus var. epactius of Knight and Marks (1952:525,546).
Aedes atropalpus epactius of O’Meara and Craig (1970a: 1398-1399).
Aedes (Finlaya) atropalpus in part of Edwards (1932:153); Aitken (1942: 166-167); Matheson
(1944: 186-187); Carpenter, Middlekauff and Chamberlain (1946:220-224); Carpenter and
LaCasse (1955:253-255); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:159); Harmston and Lawson (1967:
16-17).
Aedes atropalpus of Dyar and Knab (1906:192, in part); Carpenter (1941:40-42); Rozeboom
(1942:31); Hedeen (1953:1-10).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) atropalpus in part of Dyar (1928:213-214).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) perichares of Dyar (1928:221).
Aedes atropalpus perichares of O’Meara and Craig (1970a:1399).
Aedes atropalpus nielseni of O’Meara and Craig (1970a:1399).
Aedes (Culicelsa) fluviatilis in part of Bonne and Bonne-Wepster (1925:415-418). _
For additional references see Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:254) and Carpenter (1968:83) (rec-
ords of atropalpus from the southcentral and southwestern United States of America).
FEMALE. Wing: 3.88 mm. Proboscis: 2.64 mm. Forefemur: 2.23 mm. Abdo-
men: about 3.1 mm. Head: Eyes narrowly to moderately separated above anten-
nae, the shortest distance between them about equal to 1.0-2.0 times the diam-
eter of 1 ommatidium. Erect scales usually white to dingy-white or yellowish me-
sally and brown laterally, sometimes predominantly or entirely light. Decumbent
scales white or some lateral ones tinged with tan or gold. Dorsolateral surface
usually with small to large brown patch. Torus with small hairs only or with
small hairs and few to numerous small light to dark scales. Scales of flagellar
segment | white. Thorax: Integument of mesoscutum light to dark brown. Weak-
ly developed acrostichal and anterior dorsocentral bristles sometimes developed
on disc; 1 or more weakly to moderately developed humeral and/or lateral pre-
scutal bristles sometimes developed; 1 or more moderately to strongly developed
posterior fossal bristles usually present. Background scales of mesoscutum vary-
ing from entirely very dark bronzy-brown or coppery-brown through brown with
extensive areas of pale yellowish or golden to nearly entirely yellow or golden;
scales of median anterior patch, anterior lateral crescent, posterior outer dorso-
central line, supraalar area and prescutellar area usually white or whitish, some-
times some or most yellowish or golden; anterior lateral crescent narrow to mod-
erately broad. Scutellar scales white or some or all yellowish or pale golden, some-
times some or most on midlobe brown. Narrow curved scales along upper edge
of ppn white and/or yellowish, sometimes some brown. Legs: Hindfemur usually
with dark scales extending to near base dorsally. Wing: White scaling at base of
costa variable, sometimes absent, usually in moderately large patch, sometimes
in line extending to or slightly beyond crossvein h. Abdomen: Sternite II usually
entirely white scaled; sternites II]-VII variable, white with very small to large lat-
eral subapical or apical dark-scaled patch or more distal or most with complete
narrow to broad apical dark band.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 99
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus about 0.74-
0.87 length of proboscis. Thorax: Anterior lateral light-scaled crescent of meso-
scutum sometimes broader than in female.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 46). Claspette filament usually yellowish to light tan,
concolorous with claspette stem or nearly so and lighter than sidepiece. Segment
VIII: Bristles of tergite more numerous and finer than in atropalpus. Sidepiece:
Specialized setae of basal tergomesal area very numerous, arranged more or less
in a nearly circular to broadly elliptical patch of 5 or 6 rows, the setae of the
more distal rows nearly as long and strong as setae of basal rows; many setae
of mesal half of tergal surface elongate and directed dorsad or dorsomesad; sev-
eral of the more basal enlarged setae of sternomesal surface conspicuously curved
dorsad. Claspette: Apical setae of stem long, moderately strong, strongly curved
dorsad.
PUPA (fig. 46). Abdomen: about 3.1 mm. Trumpet: 0.54 mm. Paddle: 0.78
mm. Paddle: Distal portion of inner half usually with small submarginal spicules.
LARVA (fig. 47). Head: 1.07 mm. Siphon: 0.74 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.34 mm.
Head: Moderately to rather strongly pigmented, tan to brown, uniform or an-
terior and posterior portions slightly darker. Mental plate usually with 10 or 11
(9-12) teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Moderately pigmented, tan
to brown, its base usually concolorous with or slightly lighter or darker than an-
tennal prominence. Thorax: Hair 1-M weakly to moderately developed, usually
short to moderately long. Segment VIIJ: Comb scales moderately numerous, us-
ually 18-34 (7-41). Siphon: Base in mature larva usually not irregularly sclero-
tized ventrally between rows of pecten teeth, so that there is usually no exten-
sive basal ventral membranous area. Pecten teeth usually 11-17 (9-19), those at
base of row usually not noticeably irregular in size, shape or position, and usu-
ally arising from sclerotized portion of siphon.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes epactius differs from atropalpus as follows: in the adult
by (1) the more closely approximated eyes, which are separated by less than 2.0
ommatidial diameters, (2) the ornamentation of the mesoscutum (see below), (3)
the ornamentation of the hindfemur, which is usually dark scaled to near base
dorsally, (4) the usual presence of posterior fossal bristles, and (5) the usually
longer palpus of the male, which is 0.74-0.87 length of the proboscis in all but
depauperate individuals; in the male genitalia by (1) the more numerous special-
ized setae of the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece and their arrangement in
a broadly elliptical to nearly circular patch of 5 or 6 rows, (2) the setae of the
mesal half of the tergal surface of the sidepiece, many of which are elongate and
directed dorsad or dorsomesally, (3) the relatively long, moderately strong, and
strongly dorsally curved apical seta of the claspette stem, and (4) the more num-
erous and finer bristles on tergite VIII; and in the larva by (1) the more uni-
formly pigmented head and antenna, (2) the usually fewer comb scales (usually
fewer than 34), (3) the usual absence of an extensive unsclerotized area at the
base of the ventral surface of the siphon of the mature fourth instar larva, and
(4) the usually weaker and shorter hair 1-M. Pupae of epactius and atropalpus
are, for the most part, apparently indistinguishable, but small submarginal spic-
ules are more frequently developed on the distal portion of the inner half of the
paddle in epactius.
The mesoscutal ornamentation of epactius is extremely variable. In Costa Rica,
where the darkest individuals occur, the mesoscutum is always dark bronzy-brown
scaled with a conspicuous pattern of silver-white scales in a narrow anterior lateral
100 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
crescent-shaped mark made up of the joined lateral prescutal and posterior fossal
lines, in a median anterior patch, among the supraalar bristles, in a broken pos-
terior outer dorsocentral line, and in separate small anterior and lateral prescutel-
lar patches. In Utah, where the lightest individuals occur, the mesoscutum is fre-
quently predominantly yellowish to golden scaled with an indistinct and incom-
plete pattern of lighter yellow or whitish scales similar to that outlined above
for individuals from Costa Rica. Intermediates between these extremes in orna-
mentation occur in other populations of this species. Individuals from southeastern
Arizona and Texas may be fully as light as those from Utah or may have the
mesoscutum coppery-brown scaled with a conspicuous pattern of yellowish, gold-
en and/or white scales identical in extent to that of specimens from Costa Rica.
Individuals from southern Mexico may be as dark as those from Costa Rica ex-
cept for the more coppery color of the dark mesoscutal scales or may have many
of the dark scales of the anterior portion of the mesoscutum replaced by pale
yellowish or golden scales.
At the level of populations the variation in mesoscutal ornamentation of epac-
tius is more or less clinal, with the more austral populations averaging progres-
sively darker. However, at the level of individuals this same variation is to some
extent nonregional, with individuals from a particular place as light as those from
several hundred kilometers to the north or as dark as those from great distances
to the south.
In a recent study of the Atropalpus Group, O’Meara and Craig (1970a,b) des-
cribed a new subspecies, atropalpus nielseni, for the Utah population of epactius
and resurrected perichares Dyar to subspecific status for the populations of epac-
tius from Costa Rica and El Salvador. These subspecies differed from their atro-
palpus epactius in ornamentation of the mesoscutum and in a number of other
adult characteristics (O'Meara and Craig, 1970a:1395). As indicated above, the
differences in ornamentation of the mesoscutum cannot be used to diagnose sub-
species. Variation in some of the other colorational characteristics used by O’Meara
and Craig is more or less correlated with that of the mesoscutum. Variation in
many of the other characteristics listed by them is far greater than indicated, even
in the laboratory strains examined by these authors, and, consequently, these char-
acteristics are of no value in diagnosing different populations. It appears then that
epactius is not divisible into geographical races and, as a result, I am reducing
nielseni and perichares to synonymy with it.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of epactius are usually found in holes in rock and
concrete and in rock-filled pools, but have also been collected 1 or more times
in ground pools, stream pools, Indian mortars, artificial containers (particularly
those made of concrete, fired clay or metal), treeholes and cavities in agave leaves.
The species is sometimes associated with Ae. (Ochlerotatus) fluviatilis, Ae. (Aztec-
aedes) ramirezi and Ae. (Protomacleaya) gabriel Schick, 1970 in the southern
part of its range and with Ae. (P.) hendersoni and Ae. (P.) zoosophus in the north-
ern part. Adults of both sexes have been taken at artificial lights and in “‘biting-
landing-swarming”’ collections with human hosts. Females bite humans readily.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 45). Aedes epactius is found from the southwestern and
southcentral United States to Panama. Material examined: 3560 specimens; 629
males, 582 females, 1202 larvae, 1147 pupae; 271 individual rearings (166 larval,
89 pupal, 16 incomplete).
COSTA RICA. Alajuela: Alajuela, 30 July 1921, A. Alfaro, 9 F [USNM]. Ciruelas, 29 Oct
1920-26 July 1921, A. Alfaro, 21 M, 24 F, 4 M gen [USNM]; 29 July 1971, A. Berrios Arias
Zavortink: New World Aedes 101
(CR 296), 2 L; 4 Nov 1971, D. Schroeder (CR 516), 2 IpM (516-10,11), 2 L [UCLA]. Guana-
caste: Liberia, H.W. Kumm, 15 M, 5 F [UCLA], 4 M, 2 L [USNM]. Liberia and Santa Cruz,
Nov 1970, M. Dunn (UCLA 581), 3 IpM (581-11,14,15), 4 IpF (581-10,12,13,16), 6 M, 2 M gen,
2 F, 11 P, 13 L [UCLA]. Miravalles, 20 July 1922, A. Alfaro, 2 M, 1 F [USNM].
EL SALVADOR. Alegria, 1 M [USNM]. La Muralla, 13 Oct 1941, 2 M, 2 F, 1 M gen [USNM].
Metapan, Oct 1968, S. Breeland (UCLA 580), 14 IpM (580-10,13,14,16,17,19-23,26,28-30), 9 IpF
(580-11,12,15,18,24,25,27,31,32), 314 M, 3 M gen, 217 F, 606 P, 481 L [UCLA], 5 M, 5 F,
2 M gen [USNM]. Locality not specified, 1 L [USNM].
GUATEMALA. Guatemala: Guatemala City, Oct 1957, H.D. Pratt, 1 P, 1 L [CDC].
MEXICO. Chiapas: Sumidero (24 km N Tuxtla Gutierrez), 23 July 1963, E. Fisher (MF 8),
14 M, 2 Mgen, 8 F; 16 Aug 1964, E. Fisher (MEX 115), 1 F; 17 Aug 1964, E. Fisher and D. Verity
(MEX 119), 2 IpM (119-15,16), 1 pF (119-10), 16 L; same data (MEX 128), 3 M, 1 M gen, 4 F;
18 Aug 1964, D. Verity (MEX 129), 3 IpM (129-10,11,14), 2 Ip (129-12,13), 9 L [UCLA].
Guerrero: Chilpancingo, 25 Aug 1949, A. Paoliello, 2 M, 2 F [USNM]. Chilpancingo (1.6 km S),
29 Aug 1964, D. Verity (MEX 139), 2 lpF (139-14,16), 1 pM (139-12), 1 pF (139-13), 1 Ip
(139-15), 1 M, 1 L [UCLA]. Morelos: Cuernavaca, 6 Nov 1938, H.W. Kumm, 3 M, 1 F [UCLA].
Vicinity of Tepoztlan, 7 Sept 1965, D.A. Schroeder (MEX 348), 1 Ip (348-10), 1 L; same data
(MEX 353), 2 IpM (353-10,11), 1 pF (353-100), 2 Ip (353-12,13), 1 P, 11 L; 28 June 1970,
K. and D.A. Schroeder (MEX 506), 2 IpM (506-10,11), 2 IpF (506-12,13); same data (MEX
510), 5 IpM (510-10-12,14,18), 6 IpF (510-13,15-17,19,90), 2 pF (510-102,103), 1 P, 13 L;
same data (MEX 512), 1 L; 11 Aug 1970, K. and D.A. Schroeder (MEX 623), 3 IpF (623-
10,12,13), 1 M, 1 P, 1 L; same data (MEX 626), 1 IpF (626-17), 1 F, 1 P; same data (MEX
629), 4 IpM (629-11-14), 1 IpF (629-15), 1 pF (629-10); same data (MEX 630), 1 IpF (630-10);
same data (MEX 631), 7 IpM (631-10,14,16,23,25,28,29), 14 IpF (631-11-13,15,17-22,24,26,
27,30), 8 pM (631-31,100,103,105-109), 4 pF (631-32,101,102,104), 2 M, 1 F, 9 P, 16 L;
same data (MEX 632), 2 IpF (632-12,13), 3 pM (632-100,101,103), 2 Ip (632-10,11), 1 M, 4 F,
3 P, 6 L; same data (MEX 633), 3 IpF (633-10,12,14), 2 lp (633-11,13), 2 M, 2 P [UCLA].
Nuevo Leon: Sabinas Hidalgo, 6-16 Oct 1943, B. Brookman, 2 F [UCLA]. Oaxaca: Almoloya,
20 July 1905, F. Knab (310), 1 IpF (310c), 1 M, 1 M gen, 3 F [USNM]. Oaxaca, 21 June
1944, B. Brookman, 1 M, 3 F [UCLA]. Puebla: Izucar de Matamoros, 16 Aug 1944, B. Brookman,
4M [UCLA]. Veracruz: Cordoba, 4 Jan 1908, F. Knab, 2 M, 2 F, 2 L [USNM]; 22 July 1964,
E. Fisher and D. Verity (MEX 73), 1 lpM (73-12), 1 pF (73-11), 1 P, 34 L; 26 July 1965, D.A.
Schroeder (MEX 234), 3 IpM (234-32-34), 3 pM (234-30,31,109), 4 pF (234-103-105,108), 1
M gen, 22 L [UCLA]. Fortin de las Flores, 27 July 1965, R.X. Schick and D.A. Schroeder
(MEX 236), 1 IpM (236-21), 9 IpF (236-20,22-29), 7 pM (236-102-104,110-113), 8 pF (236-
100,101,105-109,114), 2 M gen, 16 P, 33 L; 3 Aug 1965, D.A. Schroeder (MEX 269), 3 IpM
(269-10,11,13), 2 IpF (269-12,14), 1 pM (269-16), 1 pF (269-17), 1 lp (269-15), 1 M gen, 3 L;
7 Aug 1965, R.X. Schick and D.A. Schroeder (MEX 278A), 1 pF (278A-100); 9 Aug 1965,
R.X. Schick and D.A. Schroeder (MEX 288), 3 IpF (288-10-12), 1 P; 21 Aug 1966, D.A. Schroeder
(MEX 440), 1 pF (440-100), 1 L [UCLA]. Orizaba, 11 Aug 1965, R.X. Schick and D.A. Schroeder
(MEX 292), 1 IpM (292-21), 1 IpF (292-20), 1 pM (292-22), 5 pF (292-23-25,100,101), 1 P,
2 L [UCLA].
PANAMA. Panama: Pacora, 1 Aug 1950, 10 L [UCLA].
UNITED STATES. Arizona: Grand Canyon, Grand Canyon National Monument, Mohave Co.,
May 1970, M.J. Nelson, 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F [UCLA]. Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mts., Santa
Cruz Co., 22 Aug 1954, W.A. McDonald (UCLA 134), 2 IpM (134-103,104), 1 pM (134-102),
2 pF (134-101,105), 2 M gen, 4 P, 2 L [UCLA]. Mendoza Canyon, Coyote Mts., Pima Co., 5
Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 620), 2 IpM (620-10,17), 7 IpF (620-11-14,16,19,20), 2 Ip
(620-15,18), 1 pM (620-100), 7 M, 2 M gen, 3 F, 10 P, 21 L; 6 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink
(UCLA 625), 1 lpM (625-10), 5 IpF (625-11-15), 6 pM (625-100-102,104,106,108), 8 pF (625-
103,105,107,109-113), 23 M, 22 F, 52 P, 86 L [UCLA]. Sabino Basin, Santa Catalina Mts.,
Pima Co., 23 Aug, C.H.T. Townsend, 1 F [USNM]. Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mts., Pima
Co., 7 Aug 1963, J.F. Burger (UCLA 396), 10 M, 20 F, 3 M gen, 8 L; 25 July 1965, J.F.
Burger (UCLA 279), 39 P, 57 L; 12 Sept 1968, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 447), 1 IpM (447-12),
3 IpF (447-10,14,15), 1 Ip (447-13), 8 pM (447-100-102,105,106,110,111,113), 2 pF (447-
102 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
103,104), 15 M, 22 F, 56 P, 18 L; same data (UCLA 479), 10 IpM (479-10,12,13,16-18,20,
23,24,29), 14 IpF (479-11,14,19,21,22,25-28,40-44), 1 lp (479-15), 4 pM (479-101-104), 2 pF
(479-100,105), 2 M gen, 10 L [UCLA]. Arkansas: Locality not specified, 1938 (Florida No.
2145), 1 M, 1 F, 10 L [USNM]. Missouri: Neosho, Camp Crowder, 26 July-26 Aug 1942, A.B.
Gurney, 6 M, 2 F, 1 M gen [USNM]. Shoal Creek near Redings Mill, Newton Co., 1-26 Aug
1942, A.B. Gurney, 7 M, 1 F, 1 M gen, 2 L [USNM]. Table Rock Reservoir, 15 July 1959,
L.D. Beadle, 2 L [CDC]. New Mexico: Last Chance, in mountains of SE New Mexico, Aug-
Oct 1938, H.W. Kumm, 1 F [UCLA]. Oklahoma: Locality not specified, June 1951, 1 M gen
[CDC]. Texas: Austin, 23 Oct 1901, A.L. Melander, 7 F [USNM]. Buchanan Dam, central
Texas, 30 Apr 1938, C.P. Coogle, 2 F [USNM]. Canyon, Sept 1933, 2 F [USNM]. Chisos Mts.,
Big Bend National Park, Brewster Co., 1 Sept 1969, T.J. Zavortink (UCLA 608), 4 IpF (608-
10-13), 1 lp (608-14) [UCLA]. New Braunfels, 26 July-3 Aug 1942, E.S. Ross, 3 M, 3 F,3 L
[USNM]. Onion Creek, Travis Co., 4 Sept 1943, D. Eyles, 15 M, 5 F [USNM], 1 L [CDC].
Travis Co., Oct 1967, B. Hoffmann, 5 M, 5 F, 2 M gen, 10 L [USNM]. Utah: Arches National
Monument, Grand Co., Sept 1969 (Univ. Utah lab colony, Fs), 15 M, 45 F, 3 M gen, 60 P,
106 L [UCLA].
Additional Records From the Literature
MEXICO. Baja California Sur: Triunfo (Aitken, 1942:166-167; as atropalpus).
NICARAGUA. (Dyar, 1928:221, as perichares).
UNITED STATES. Colorado: Arboles, Archuleta Co. and Uravan, Montrose Co. (Harmston
and Lawson, 1967:17; as atropalpus). Kansas: (See Carpenter and LaCasse, 1955:254: as atro-
palpus).
18. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) atropalpus (Coquillett)
Figs. 45,48-50
1902. Culex atropalpus Coquillett, 1902:292. TYPE: Lectotype female, Plummer’s Island,
Montgomery Co., Maryland, United States of America, 16 July 1902, H.S. Barber
[USNM; selection of Stone and Knight, 1956:215].
Aedes (Finlaya) atropalpus of Edwards (1932:153, in part); Matheson (1944:186-187, in part);
Carpenter, Middlekauff and Chamberlain (1946:220-224, in part); Carpenter (1949:173: 1950:
64); Darsie (1951:15); Knight and Marks (1952:525,546); Carpenter and LaCasse (1955:253-
255, in part); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:159, in part).
Aedes atropalpus of Dyar and Knab (1906:192, in part; 1908:54); Howard, Dyar and Knab
(1917:638-642); Gibson (1937:105); Owen (1937:30-31); Davis (1940:49); Jakmauh (1940:
17); Knutson (1943:318); Headlee (1945:142-147); Chamberlain, Sikes, Nelson and Sudia
(1954:281,283); Steward and McWade (1960:143); Shaw and Maisey (1961:12-16); James
(1964:325-329).
Aedes atropalpus atropalpus of O’Meara and Craig (1970a: 1398).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) atropalpus of Dyar (1918:74,79; 1922b:85; 1928:213-214, in part).
Aedes (Gualteria) atropalpus of Vargas (1950:62); Vargas and Downs (1950: 171).
Ochlerotatus atropalpus of Coquillett (1906c:20). |
For additional references see Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:638-639), Carpenter and LaCasse
(1955:254) and Carpenter (1968:83).
FEMALE (fig. 48). Wing: 3.37 mm. Proboscis: 2.60 mm. Forefemur: 2.02 mm.
Abdomen: about 3.0 mm. Head: Eyes broadly separated above antennae, the short-
est distance between them 2.5-4.0 times the diameter of 1 ommatidium. Erect
scales usually dingy-yellow to golden mesally and brown laterally, sometimes en-
tirely dingy-yellow or entirely brown. Decumbent scales white, dingy-white, cream
Zavortink: New World Aedes 103
or yellowish, usually more intensely pigmented laterally. Dorsolateral surface with
small to large brown patch. Torus with patch of small white to dingy-white or
dark scales. Scales of flagellar segment 1 whitish to yellowish, sometimes some
brown. Thorax: Integument of mesoscutum brown to dark brown. Acrostichal
and anterior dorsocentral bristles absent from disc; humeral, lateral prescutal and
posterior fossal bristles absent. Background scales of mesoscutum entirely or pre-
dominantly dark bronzy-brown, sometimes a golden acrostichal line or transverse
anterior band developed; scales of median anterior patch, anterior lateral crescent,
posterior outer dorsocentral line, supraalar area and prescutellar area predomin-
antly pale yellowish-cream to light golden; anterior lateral crescent very broad,
extending mesad to dorsocentral area. Scutellar scales yellowish to golden. Narrow
curved scales along upper edge of ppn usually entirely pale yellowish to golden,
sometimes some or all bronzy-brown. Legs: Hindfemur usually entirely white scaled
in basal 0.3-0.5 and with the white scales extending farther toward apex ventrally.
Wing: White scales at base of costa extending distad to crossvein f at least on
ventral and leading surfaces. Abdomen: Sternite II white scaled; more proximal
of sternites III-VII with moderately large to large lateral apical or subapical dark
patch, more distal with complete broad apical dark band.
MALE (fig. 48). Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus
about 0.66-0.72 length of proboscis. Thorax: One posterior fossal bristle frequently
developed.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 49). Claspette filament usually brownish and more
deeply pigmented than claspette stem and sidepiece. Segment VIII: Bristles of
tergite fewer and shorter than in epactius. Sidepiece: Specialized setae of basal
tergomesal area moderately numerous, arranged more or less in a narrowly ellip-
tical patch of 2-4 rows, the setae of the more distal 1 or 2 rows fine and short-
ened; setae of mesal half of tergal surface predominantly short, fine and curved
toward apex of sidepiece; usually none of the enlarged setae of sternomesal sur-
face conspicuously curved dorsad. Claspette: Apical seta of stem relatively short,
fine, straight or slightly curved dorsad.
PUPA (fig. 49). Abdomen: about 3.6 mm. Trumpet: 0.52 mm. Paddle: 0.74
mm. Paddle: Distal portion of inner half usually without submarginal spicules. _
LARVA (fig. 50). Head: 1.04 mm. Siphon: 0.71 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.33 mm.
Head: Weakly and moderately to strongly pigmented, largely yellow to tan, darker
posteriorly and much darker, brown to blackish, anteriorly. Mental plate usually
with 8 or 9 (8-10) teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Strongly pig-
mented, largely dark brown to blackish, its base much darker than antennal prom-
inence. Thorax: Hair 1-M moderately to strongly developed, long. Segment VIIT:
Comb scales usually numerous, 34-62 (24-90). Siphon: Base in mature larva ir-
regularly sclerotized ventrally between rows of pecten teeth, so that there is an
extensive basal ventral membranous area. Pecten teeth usually 18-25 (15-28), those
at base of row frequently irregular in size, shape and position, and frequently
arising from separate small sclerotizations or from the membranous area.
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes atropalpus differs from epactius as follows: in the adult
by (1) the more widely-spaced eyes, which are separated by at least 2.5 omma-
tidial diameters, (2) the ornamentation of the mesoscutum (see below), (3) the
ornamentation of the hindfemur, which is usually entirely white scaled in the
basal 0.3-0.5, (4) the usual absence of posterior fossal bristles in the female, and
(5) the shorter palpus of the male, which is usually 0.66-0.72 length of the probos-
cis; in the male genitalia most conspicuously by (1) the fewer specialized setae
104 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
of the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece and their arrangement in a narrow-
ly elliptical patch of 2-4 rows, (2) the setae on the mesal half of the tergal sur-
face of the sidepiece, which are predominantly short, fine and curved toward the
apex of the sidepiece, (3) the relatively short, fine and usually straight or but
slightly curved apical seta of the claspette stem, and (4) the fewer but stouter
bristles on tergite VIII; and in the larva by (1) the darkly pigmented antenna
and anterior portion of the head capsule that contrast with the more lightly pig-
mented antennal prominence, (2) usually greater number of comb scales (usually
more than 34), (3) the almost universal presence of an extensive unsclerotized
area at the base of the ventral surface of the siphon in the mature fourth in-
star larva, and (4) the usually more strongly developed and longer hair 1-M. Pu-
pae of atropalpus and epactius are usually indistinguishable, but there is a greater
tendency for the small submarginal spicules on the distal portion of the inner
half of the paddle not to be developed in atropalpus.
The mesoscutal ornamentation of atropalpus is variable, but there are always
dark bronzy-brown scales in a broad median longitudinal stripe or pair of para-
acrostichal lines and laterad of the posterior dorsocentral bristles, and there are
always yellowish-cream to light golden scales extending from the dorsocentral area
to the lateral edge in the anterior 0.50-0.67 of the mesoscutum, in a median an-
terior patch, among the supraalar bristles, in a broken or complete posterior out-
er dorsocentral line, and in separate or united anterior and lateral prescutellar
patches. There may be additional yellowish to golden scales in a broken or com-
plete acrostichal line and/or a transverse anterior band.
I believe atropalpus is more primitive than epactius because it shares several
characters with fluviatilis that epactius does not and because it is restricted to a
stable area of ancient rock.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of atropalpus are found in holes in rock and con-
crete and in rock-filled pools. They are rarely associated with the immatures of
Ae. (Protomacleaya) triseriatus. Adults of atropalpus are attracted to lights and
females are attracted to humans and bite freely in the vicinity of their breeding
sites.
In the laboratory, this species has been found to be an efficient vector of east-
ern equine encephalomyelitis (Davis, 1940:49; Jakmauh, 1940:17; Chamberlain
et al., 1954:281,283) and western equine encephalomyelitis (Chamberlain et al.,
ibid.).
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 45). Aedes atropalpus occurs in southeastern Canada and
the eastern United States where it extends from Minnesota and Maine south to
Alabama and Georgia. Material examined: 748 specimens; 238 males, 303 females,
151 larvae, 56 pupae; 6 individual rearings (5 larval, 1 pupal).
CANADA. Quebec: Mouth of Metamelt River, 28 July 1928, J.O. Maloney, 2 M, 2 M gen,
7 F [USNM].
UNITED STATES. Alabama: Auburn, Chewacla State Park, 27 Apr 1953, W.L. Seal, 3 L
[USNM]. Connecticut: Double Beach, 24 Aug 1904, P.L. Butrick, 2 M, 1 M gen [USNM].
District of Columbia: Catholic University, July 1905-7 Oct 1906, T. Pergande, 4 M, 2 F [USNM].
Chain Bridge, Sept 1906, T. Pergande, 4 M, 7 F; 17 Aug 1914, H.G. Dyar, 1 M, 2 F [USNM];
11 June 1943, N.E. Good, 29 L [UCLA]. Locality not specified, 20-21 May 1903, W.V. Warner,
1M, 1 F; 10 Apr 1945, N.E. Good, 2 M, 1 F [USNM] ; 8 May 1937, 10 M; 16 Oct 1941,:1 M; June-
Aug 1943, N.E. Good, 19 M, 9 F [UCLA]. Georgia: Atlanta, 24 Mar-7 Apr 1950, H.D. Pratt,
3 M, 1 F [CDC]. Furman Shoals, Oconee River, Baldwin Co., 21 Mar 1948, D. Eyles, 5 M, 2 F
[CDC], 2 M, 1 M gen, 2 F, 4 L [USNM]. Milledgeville, H.D. Pratt, 3 L [CDC]. Tallulah Gorge,
29 Mar 1950, Cole and Wall, 7 M, 13 F, 3 M gen, 5 L [CDC]. Kentucky: Cumberland Falls,
Zavortink: New World Aedes 105
12 Aug 1948, N.E. Good, 1 M, 2 F, 1 M gen [CDC]. Maine: Georgetown, 24 July 1945, J.L.
Bean, 3 F [CDC]. Islesboro, Aug 1928, J.M. Aldrich, 1 M [USNM]. Mt. Desert Island, 12-25
July 1955, 2 M, 1 M gen [CDC]; 1-12 July 1955, F.R. Shaw, 6 L [USNM]. Orono, 18 July
1911, 1 F [CU]. Locality not specified, Sept 1922, 1 F [CU]. Maryland: Bethesda, Oct 1946, 9 L;
1950, H.L. Trembly, 5 M, 12 F [CDC]. Great Falls, Sept 1903, J. Kotinsky, 10 P, 1 L [USNM].
Potomac River, May 1930, 1 M, 1 M gen [CU]; 11 P, 15 L [USNM]. Plummer’s Island, 18 May
1902-20 June 1905, H.S. Barber, 14 F; 29 Aug 1912, A.N. Caudell, 2 F; 9-24 June 1902, R.P.
Currie, 6 F; 2 July-26 Aug, R.P. Currie, 5 F; May 1904, H.G. Dyar, 2 L; Oct, H.G. Dyar, 2 M,
2 M gen; 30 May 1909, F. Knab, 1 F; 24 Aug 1907-14 July 1912, W.L. McAtee, 3 F; 7 June-
24 July 1903, W.V. Warner, 1 M, 2 F; 24 June 1906, 1 F; 2 M, 3 F [USNM]; 27 June 1965, W.
Grimm (UCLA 283), 5 IpF (283-11-15), 1 pM (283-101), 7 M, 4 M gen, 13 F,9 P,6 L [UCLA].
Stubblefield Falls, Slagu Island, May 1903, W.V. Warner, 1 M, 1 F; May 1904, H.G. Dyar, 9 L
[USNM] . Maryland ?: NIH Colony, H.L. Trembly, 24 M, 27 F [USNM] . Massachusetts: Cumming-
ton, July 1903, F. Knab (39), 6M, 8 F, 1 Mgen, 5 P,3 L;same data (41), 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 L [USNM].
Essex Co., June 1967, G.F. O'Meara, 5 M, 5 F, 10 L [USNM]. Michigan: Isle Royale, 25 July
1957, R.W. Hodges, 1 F [USNM]. Minnesota: Gooseberry Falls, Lake Co., 13 July 1952, A.R.
Barr, 1 P, 1 L [USNM]. Jay Cooke State Park, Carlton Co., 18 July 1932 and 25 July 1934,
W.B. Owen, 3 M, 2 F, 2 M gen [USNM]. New Hampshire: Center Harbor, H.G. Dyar, 1 F
[USNM]. White Mts., Morrison, 3 F [USNM]. New York: Deferiet, 30 June 1934, 1 M gen
[CU]. Forestport, 8-June 1933-18 June 1938, R. Matheson, 1 M, 1 F, 1 L [CDC], 2M, 1 F,
1 M gen [UCLA], 5 M, 1 M gen, | F, 13 L [CU], 1 L [USNM]. New Rochelle, 3 Aug 1945, 5 M, 2
F [CDC]. Old Forge, Long Lake, 23 Aug 1922, R.C. Shannon and Sibley, 1 F [CU]. Plattsburg,
25-30 July 1905, 2 F, 1 M gen, 1 L [CU]; 21 July 1905, J.M. Aldrich, 1 F [USNM]. Tupper
Lake, H.G. Dyar, 2 P, 2 L [USNM]. Wilmington, 31 July 1929, A.L. Melander, 4 M [USNM].
North Carolina: Chimney Rock, June 1921, H.P. Barret, 4 F [USNM]. Pennsylvania: Shenk’s
Ferry, 21 Oct 1901, S.E. Weber, 2 F [USNM]. Tennessee: DuPont Springs, 19 May 1935, 1 L
[USNM]. Vermont: Pittsford, 5,6 Aug 1916, 7 M, 2 F [CU]; 5 Aug 1916, G.W. Herrick, 2 M,
1 M gen, 2 F [USNM]. Readsboro, 15 June 1934, 2 F [USNM]. Virginia: Dead Run, 7 July,
R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. Difficult Run, 11 July 1906, H.S. Barber and F. Knab, 5 F [USNM].
Great Falls, Oct 1904-May 1907, T. Pergande, 24 M, 29 F; Aug 1920, C.T. Greene, 10 M, 12 F;
Sept 1913, E. Martini, 4 M, 6 F; 14 Sept 1913, F. Knab, 8 M, 3 F; 8 May 1949, C.W. Sabrowsky,
1 F; Aug 1903, J. Kotinsky, 2 F; June 1911, 2 M, 4 F; 4 Oct 1936, 3 L; Conrad, 1 M; 1M,7F
[USNM]. Mt. Solon, 20 June 1950, A. Stone, 1 F [USNM]. Occoquam, 29 Sept 1935, A.
Stone, | M, 1 F, 8 L [USNM]. Plummer’s Island, Maryland (near), 20 May 1914, R.C. Shannon,
1 M gen [USNM]. Richmond, 26 Sept 1901, E.G. Williams, 3 M, 2 F; 22 May 1947, W.E.
Bickley, 1 M, 1 F [USNM]. Rosslyn, July 1910, T. Pergande, 1 F [USNM]. Locality not spec-
ified, Aug 1903, T. Pergande, 21 M, 2 M gen, 30 F [USNM].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. W.V. Warner, 3 M, 3 F; Florida No. 1922, 1 M, 3 F; 2 M, 2 M gen,
12 P, 8 L [USNM]|; 1 F [CDC]; 1M gen, 1 L [CU].
Additional Records From the Literature
CANADA. Labrador: (Steward and McWade, 1960:143). Ontario: Cordova Mines (James,
1964:325-329). Ottawa River, Fitzroy Harbour (Gibson, 1937:105). Quebec: Chaadiere River,
Beauceville (Carpenter, 1949:173). Norway Bay, St. Gedeon and Tadoussac (Shaw and Maisey,
1961:12-16).
UNITED STATES. New Jersey: (Headlee, 1945: 142-147). Rhode Island: Narragansett (Knutson,
1943:318). South Carolina: Chattooga River, Long Creek, Oconee Co. (Carpenter, 1950:64).
West Virginia: Shenandoah River, Charles Town, Jefferson Co. (Carpenter, 1950:64). Wisconsin:
Jim Falls, Chippewa Co. (O’Meara and Craig, 1970a: 1398).
106 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
FLUVIATILIS GROUP
19. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) fluviatilis (Lutz)
Figs. 45,51-53
1904. Culex fluviatilis Lutz, 1904a:8, 1904c:4. TYPE: Lectotype female, the holotype of
tripunctata Theobald, 1907, Franca, Rio Grande, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 23 Sept 1903, A.
Lutz [BM; selection of Belkin, 1971:20].
1907. Danielsia mediomaculata Theobald, 1907:245-246. TYPE: Lectotype male, Para [=
Belem], Para, Brazil, E.A. Goeldi [BM; selection of Belkin, 1968:6]. Synonymy with
fluviatilis (Lutz, 1904) by Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:717).
1907. Danielsia tripunctata Theobald, 1907:247-248. TYPE: Holotype female, Franca, Rio
Grande, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 23 Sept 1903, A. Lutz [BM; see Belkin, 1968:8]. Synonymy
with fluviatilis (Lutz, 1904) by Bonne-Wepster and Bonne (1921:23) and Belkin (1971:
20).
1907. Aedes lithoecetor Dyar and Knab, 1907:201. TYPE: Lectotype female (101.5), upper
Rio Chagres between Alhajuela and San Juan, Panama, Panama, larva from rockhole,
20 May 1907, A. Busck [USNM; selection of Stone and Knight, 1956:220]. Synony-
mized with fluviatilis (Lutz, 1904) by Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:717); resurrected
by Dyar (1928:220); NEW SYNONYMY.
1922. Aedes draconarius Dyar, 1922c:194-195. TYPE: Lectotype female, St. Laurent du
Maroni, Guyane, French Guiana, 1909, E. Brimont [USNM; selection of Stone and
Knight, 1957:201]. Synonymy with fluviatilis (Lutz, 1904) by Dyar (1928:219).
Aedes (Finlaya) fluviatilis of Edwards (1932:153); Knight and Marks (1952:538,562); Lane
(1953:692-695); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:162); Forattini and Rabello (1960:87-94);
Forattini (1965:383-388).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) fluviatilis of Dyar (1918:74,79; 1925:146; 1928:219-220); Davis and
Shannon (1931:24-25,27-28); Soper, Penna, Cardoso, Serafim, Frobisher and Pinheiro (1933:
583). ,
Aedes (Culicelsa) fluviatilis of Dyar (1921b:36); Bonne and Bonne-Wepster (1925:415-418).
Aedes fluviatilis of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:717-721); Bonne-Wepster and Bonne (1921:
23); Dyar (1922c:195).
Gualteria fluviatilis of Peryassu (1908:181-182).
Culicada fluviatilis of Theobald (1907:342-344).
Culex fluviatilis of Lutz (1905:48-49).
Aedes (Taeniorhynchus) lithoecetor of Dyar (1928:220).
Aedes (Finlaya) lithoecetor of Lane (1953:697-699); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:166);
Forattini (1965:393-394).
Aedes (Gualteria) lithoecetor of Vargas (1950:62).
Aedes lithoecetor of Kumm, Komp and Ruiz (1940:417).
Aedes mediomaculata of Dyar and Knab (1907:201).
Aedes tripunctata of Dyar and Knab (1907:201). |
For additional references see Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:717); Dyar (1928:219,220); Lane
(1953:692,697-698); and Travis and Labadan (1967:8-9).
FEMALE (fig. 51). Wing: 2.73 mm. Proboscis: 2.20 mm. Forefemur: 1.68 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.8 mm. Head: Eyes moderately to broadly separated above an-
tennae. Orbital bristles moderately numerous, 4-7 mesal pairs strongly developed,
4 or 5 lateral pairs moderately developed. Head scales predominantly cream-col-
ored, light ash-gray or very pale golden, usually some lateral erect scales and some
dorsal and dorsolateral broad flat scales brown. Proboscis longer than forefemur.
Torus with moderate to large patch of light or light and dark scales; flagellar seg-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 107
ment 1 with patch of light scales. Thorax: Integument tan to dark brown. Acros-
tichal and dorsocentral bristles usually absent from disc, rarely a few weak an-
terior acrostichals and posterior dorsocentrals developed; 1 or 2 strong humeral
bristles usually developed, lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles absent;
parascutellar bristle present. Mesoscutal ornamentation extremely varied: anterior
half of mesoscutum ranging from (1) predominantly silver-white, light ash-gray
and/or very pale golden scaled with slightly darker, more distinctly golden or cop-
pery scales in anterior dorsocentral area and sometimes fossal area to (2) pre-
dominantly dark bronzy-brown scaled with a few yellowish to cream-colored scales
in median and lateral patches on anterior promontory and slightly to conspicu-
ously lighter and more distinctly golden or coppery scales in lateral prescutal and
posterior fossal areas and sometimes anterior dorsocentral area; posterior half of
mesoscutum predominantly coppery to dark bronzy-brown scaled with silver-white,
cream-colored and/or pale golden scales in small to large supraalar patch and sep-
arate or united median and lateral prescutellar patches and sometimes in poster-
ior acrostichal and posterior outer dorsocentral lines. Scutellar scales silver to
pale golden. Paratergite usually with few to numerous scales in lower anterior
portion, sometimes bare. Apn scales usually predominantly pale golden to golden
but sometimes predominantly or entirely coppery to brown; ppn with scales en-
tirely or predominantly narrow curved, usually cream-colored to pale golden or
golden along upper and posterior margins or in upper anterior and lower poster-
ior portions and coppery to dark bronzy-brown on disc, but varying from en-
tirely light ash-gray or pale golden to entirely dark bronzy-brown; additional patch
of dingy-white broad flat scales frequently developed in lower portion of ppn;
pleural patches white to dingy-white or pale golden; ssp line usually broadened
or extended dorsad anteriorly; psp usually without scales; upper posterior por-
tion of pcx membrane and/or adjacent ridge usually with a few scales. Legs: Outer
surface of hindcoxa predominantly bare. Forefemur with light scales in moder-
ately long streak on dorsal and/or upper part of posterior surface and sometimes
in short streak at base of ventral surface; midfemur with light scales in moder-
ately long to long streak on posterior surface and sometimes in short streak at
base of dorsal and/or ventral surface; hindfemur usually entirely light scaled in
basal 0.4-0.5 and dark scaled apically, dark scales sometimes scattered along dor-
sal surface in basal portion. Knee spots very small to moderate. Tibiae sometimes
with light. scales in very small patch or band at apex. Tarsi with white to dingy
or pale golden scales in dorsal patch or band at base of segments 1-3, 4 or 5 and
sometimes in small dorsal patch at apex of segment 1 or segments 1 and 2; light
marking progressively smaller on more distal segments, usually progressively larger
on more caudal legs; additional pale scales sometimes in streak on posterior and/
or ventral surface of tarsal segment 1 of foreleg and midleg and tarsal segments
1 and 2 of hindleg. Wing: Costa usually with small white patch at base. Haltere:
Scales dark or dark and light. Abdomen: Laterotergite with scales along lower
edge. Tergites II-VII dark scaled with white to dingy-white or pale golden scales
in basolateral patch that extends to or nearly to apex of segment laterally, usu-
ally in middorsal basal or submedian patch or middorsal streak to near apex of
segment on all or only more proximal and/or more distal segments, and some-
times in narrow incomplete to moderately broad complete basal band on more
proximal segments. Sternites light scaled with dark scales usually in small to mod-
erate lateral or sublateral apical to median patch or streak and sometimes in very
narrow apical band on more distal segments.
108 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
MALE (fig. 51). Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus
about 0.70-0.95 length of proboscis; segment 4 swollen; apex of segment 3 and
all of segment 4 with numerous bristles, segment 5 with few bristles; dark scaled
with inconspicuous to conspicuous light patch at base of segment 5, segments 4
and 5, or segments 3-5. Torus with scales; flagellar segment 12 longer than seg-
ment 13. Thorax: Mesoscutum usually more extensively light scaled than in fe-
male from same collection. Abdomen: Tergites frequently with basal light band.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 52). Sidepiece: Moderately long; basal tergomesal area
slightly to conspicuously swollen, with a clump of setae, but with only a few
(3-9) of the more dorsal and basal of these setae enlarged; setae of sternomesal
surface strong and straight or very strong, sinuous and conspicuously curved dor-
sad. Claspette: Stem moderately long to long; with weakly developed setae; fila-
ment terete to flattened, sometimes conspicuously expanded and striate. Clasper:
Broadest at base.
PUPA (fig. 52). Abdomen: about 2.8 mm. Trumpet: 0.46 mm. Paddle: 0.61
mm. Cephalothorax: Weakly to strongly pigmented, lighter ventrally. Trumpet:
Very light brown to brown, usually slightly darkened toward apex. Abdomen:
Weakly to strongly pigmented, sometimes lighter posteriorly. Hair 1-I1 moderately
developed, usually 7-20b (5-25); hair 1-III-V moderately developed, usually 2-4b
(1-6); hair 1-VI,VII weakly to moderately developed, usually 1-3b (1-4) on VI,
single or double on VII. Hair 5-IV,V 1.3-2.2 length of corresponding segment.
Hair 8-VI,VII frequently dorsal. Terminal Segments: Male genital lobe moderate-
ly large, about 1.0-1.2 length of tergite VIII. Paddle: Apex usually rounded, some-
times slightly emarginate. Paddle without conspicuous wrinkles near apex of midrib.
LARVA (fig. 53). Head: 1.01 mm. Siphon: 0.83 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.33 mm.
Head: Weakly to strongly pigmented, ocular area lighter, collar darker. Hair 5-C
3-5b, mesad of 6-C. Hair 6-C usually single or double (1-3b). Hair 7-C 5-8b (4-
9). Mental plate usually with 9-11 (7-11) teeth on each side of median tooth.
Antenna: Weakly to strongly pigmented. Thorax: Hairs 1-3-P arising from alve-
olar plate. Tubercles of hairs 5,6-P sometimes joined. Hair 1-M long, usually sin-
gle (1-3b). Hair 5-P usually single (single or double). Hairs 13-T and 14-M weak-
ly developed, 5-30b. Abdomen: Hair 1-IV,V moderately to strongly developed,
usually single or double (1-4b). Hair 6-III-V usually single or double (1-3b). Hair
13-IV,V single or double. Segment VIIT: Comb scales irregularly cleft and fringed;
30-110 in number. Siphon: Moderately long; index 2.5-3.1. Acus well developed,
attached. Pecten teeth 9-23, in an even row, the apical teeth not detached. Hair
1-S arising near or beyond end of pecten. Anal Segment: Saddle small to mod-
erate in size. Ventral brush strongly developed; hair 4a-X usually 4-6b (3-7); hair
4b-X usually 4-6b (3-8); hair 4c-X usually 6-8b (5-8).
SYSTEMATICS. Aedes fluviatilis is distinguished from the species of the re-
lated Atropalpus Group by the following characters: in the adult by (1) the ab-
sence of well developed posterior dorsocentral bristles, (2) the usual absence of
scales on the postspiracular area and the outer surface of the hindcoxa, (3) the
usual presence of scales on the lower anterior portion of the paratergite, on the
upper portion of the postcoxal membrane and/or the adjacent ridge, and on the
lower edge of the laterotergite, (4) the smaller light tarsal markings that are large-
ly restricted to the base of the segments, (5) the predominantly dark scaled hind-
tarsal segment 5, and (6) the relatively dense vestiture of bristles on palpal seg-
ment 4 of the male; in the male genitalia by (1) the relatively few enlarged se-
tae that are largely restricted to the more basal and dorsal portions of the clump
Zavortink: New World Aedes 109
of setae in the basal tergomesal area of the sidepiece, and (2) the usually flat-
tened and sometimes broadened and striate claspette filament; in the pupa by
(1) the longer hair 5-IV,V, which is about 1.3-2.2 times longer than the corres-
ponding tergite, (2) the smaller male genital lobe, which is 1.0-1.2 times as long
as tergite VIII, and (3) the rounded or but slightly emarginate apex of the pad-
dle; and in the larva most conspicuously by (1) the 3-5-branched hair 5-C, (2)
the usually single or double (1-3b) hair 6-III,I[V, (3) the single or double 13-IV,V,
(4) the irregularly cleft and fringed comb scales, and (5) the evenly spaced pec-
ten teeth that do not extend far distad of 1-S.
The ornamentation of the adult of fluviatilis is extremely variable. The palpus
of the male may have a single inconspicuous light patch at the base of segment
5 or conspicuous light patches at the base of segments 3-5. The anterior portion
of the mesoscutum of the female varies from predominantly pale golden to light
ash-gray or silver-white with slightly darker, more distinctly golden or coppery
scales in the dorsocentral area to predominantly dark bronzy-brown with slightly
lighter, more distinctly golden or coppery scales in the lateral prescutal and pos-
terior fossal areas and cream-colored to yellowish scales on the anterior promon-
tory. Scales on the head and anterior and posterior pronotal lobes vary from en-
tirely light to partially dark (head) or entirely dark (apn and ppn); the color
tends to vary along with that of the scales on the mesoscutum. The light mark-
ings on the tarsi may be basal or partially overlap the joints between segments
1 and 2 and 2 and 3. The abdominal tergites may be entirely dark scaled dor-
sally or have light scales in a basal band, a middorsal basal or submedian patch
or a middorsal streak. Except for the palpus of the male, which is consistently
darker in specimens from the northern portion of the range (Mexico to Colombia
and Venezuela), these variations are largely nongeographical and specimens ap-
proaching the extremes can frequently be found in the same collection or in dif-
ferent collections from the same general area.
The male genitalia of specimens from the Guianas and extreme southern Brazil
and adjacent northern Argentina differ in 2 important respects from those of spec-
imens from throughout the rest of the range. In both these areas the filament
of the claspette is much broadened and conspicuously striate and the setae of
the sternomesal surface of the sidepiece are very strong and conspicuously curved
dorsad distally. The significance of these variations is not known.
Larvae from the upper Amazon drainage in Ecuador tend to be slightly neo-
tenic, with fewer teeth on the mental plate (7 or 8 on each side instead of the
usual 9-11) and frequently only 5 pairs of hairs in the ventral brush. Again, the
significance of these variations is unknown.
In light of the considerable unexplained variability in fluviatilis, it is possible
that I am confusing 2 or more species. However, I prefer this broad treatment
until much more material, particularly adults reared under uniform conditions and
with associated larval and pupal skins, is available from South America.
BIONOMICS. The immature stages of fluviatilis are usually found in rockholes,
rockpools and stream pools, but are also found in ground pools, holes in con-
crete, treeholes and artificial containers. There is | record of them having been
found in association with epactius in Mexico. Females readily bite humans.
Davis and Shannon (1931:24-25,27-28) showed that fluviatilis was a fairly ef-
fective vector of yellow fever in the laboratory and Soper et al. (1933:583) be-
lieved that this species may actually have been a vector of sylvan yellow fever
in Valle do Chanaan, Espirito Santo, Brazil, in 1932.
110 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 45). Aedes fluviatilis extends from the Mexican State of
Veracruz south to Ecuador, Bolivia, northern Argentina and southern Brazil. Mater-
ial examined: 1489 specimens; 332 males, 322 females, 515 larvae, 320 pupae;
183 individual rearings (72 larval, 92 pupal, 19 incomplete).
ARGENTINA. Misiones: Iguazu, Cataratas, 7 May 1967, O. Casal and M. Garcia (ARG 480),
2 IpF (480-14,16), 1 pM (480-101), 2 pF (480-100,103), 1 M gen, 62 L [UCLA]. Iguazu,
Sept 1923, 6 F [USNM].
BOLIVIA. Cochabamba: Chapare, El Palmar, 9 Oct 1943, Torres-Munoz, 1 F [USNM]. Santa
Cruz: Cachuela, Vaca Diez, H.P. Carr (2801), 1 M gen [USNM], 1 F [UCLA].
BRAZIL. Bahia: Aratu, 17-20 May 1943, D. MacCreary, 1 M, 2 F, 1 M gen [USNM]. Rio do
Cobre, 1 L [USNM]. Ilheus, July 1930, D.E. Davis and R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. Rio Joanes,
93 M, 1 F, 2 M gen [UCLA]. Piraja, Dec 1928-Dec 1929, D.E. Davis and R.C. Shannon, 5 M gen,
3 L; 1930, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. Locality not specified, May 1933, 1 M, 1 F [CU]. Goias:
Anapolis, Mar 1936-Dec 1937, R.C. Shannon, 6 M, 2 F, 1 M gen [USNM], 1 M, 1 F [UCLA].
Guanabara: Rio de Janeiro, 8 July 1907, 2 F [USNM]. Minas Gerais: Agua Limpa, 26 Mar 1925,
F.M. Root, 1 M gen [USNM]. Para: Belterra, Santarem, June 1938, 2 F [USNM]. Boa Vista, Rio
Tapajos, C.H.T. Townsend, 2 M, 2 F, 2 M gen [USNM]. Rio de Janeiro: Iguacu, 2 L [USNM].
Sao Paulo: Atibaia (1097), 2 M, 1 M gen [UCLA], 2 M, 1 M gen, 2 F [USNM], 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 F
[CU]. Sergipe: Aracaju, 2 L [USNM].
COLOMBIA. Boyaca: Muzo, Rio Minero, 2 Sept 1941, 1 F [USNM]. Cundinamarca: Fusaga-
suga, Rio Cuja, 29 Oct 1964, E. Osorno et al. (COB 1), 1 lpM (1-29), 1 M gen, 6 P, 4 L [UCLA].
Meta: Neiva, Salto de Angostura, 9 Jan 1966, C.J. Marinkelle (COM 54), 28 P, 38 L; same data
(COM 55), 23 L [UCLA]. Villavicencio, 9 June 1943, M. Bates, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM].
COSTA RICA. Alajuela: Desamparados, Rio Machuca, 1 Nov 1971, D. Schroeder (CR 495),
4 IpM (495-50,52,55,56), 5 lpF (495-11,12,51,57,58), 1 lp (495-10), 13 pM (495-80,81,85,89,
93,100-102,104,107,112-114), 11 pF (495-82,86-88,90,91,92,94,103,105,111), 9 P, 12 L; same
data (CR 506), 7 IpM (506-10,11,13,14,19,34,37), 9 IpF (506-16-18,30,32,33,35,36,38), 5 pM
(506-100-104), 2 Ip (506-15,31), 2 F, 3 P, 11 L [UCLA]. Cartago: Peralta, 4 M, 3 F [USNM].
Turrialba, 2 M, 1 M gen [USNM]; 19 Oct 1971, D. Schroeder (CR 489), 1 lpM (489-20), 1 L
[UCLA]. San Jose: San Jose, Hatillo, 23 July 1971, S.J. Heinemann (CR 284), 1 lpM (284-10),
1 L [UCLA]. Province Unknown: Suerre, 22 July 1923, A. Alfaro, 1 M [USNM].
ECUADOR. Zamora: Zamora (10 km E), Zamora River, 4 Apr 1965, L.E. Pena (ECU 6), 1 IpF
(6-10), 9 pM (6-101-105,107,108,110,111), 5 pF (6-100,106,109,112,113), 4 lp (6-11-14), 2 M
gen, 16 P, 57 L [UCLA]. Zamora, Zamora Canyon, 5 Apr 1965, L.E. Pena (ECU 7), 3 pM
(7-102,105,106), 4 pF (7-100,103,104,107), 2 M gen, 25 L [UCLA].
FRENCH GUIANA. Guyane: Cayenne, Apr 1943, H. Floch, 3 M, 1 F [USNM]. Le Gallion,
25 Mar 1967, R.X. Schick (FG 189), 1 pF (189-100) [UCLA]. St. Laurent, Maroni River, E.
Brimont, 1 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. Jnini: Petit Saut, 20-21 Mar 1967, R.X. Schick (FG 167), 2 lpM
(167-13,41), 2 IpF (167-40,42), 1 M, 1 F, 2 M gen, 4 L [UCLA]. Petit Saut, Orstom Camp,
20 Mar 1967, R.X. Schick (FG 163), 2 lpM (163-20,22), 5 IpF (163-21,23-26), 1 lp (163-27),
1 M, 2 M gen, 2 F, 3 P, 19 L; same data (FG 164), 2 lpM (164-20,21), 2 IpF (164-22,23),
1 Ip (164-24), 1 M, 1 M gen, 1 P, 14 L [UCLA].
GUYANA. Esssequibo: Mazaruni, 3 July 1936, W.H.W. Komp, 1 M, 2 F [USNM].
HONDURAS. Colon: Trujillo, 7 Mar 1945, H.H. Crowell, 2 M, 4 F, 2 M gen [USNM].
MEXICO. Veracruz: Cordoba, 4-16 Jan 1908, F. Knab, 13 M, 10 F, 3 M gen, 3 L [USNM].
NICARAGUA. Zelaya: Bluefields, W.F. Thornton, 3 F [USNM].
PANAMA. Canal Zone: Ancon, 6 Dec 1917, 1 F [USNM]. Flamenco Island, 12 Aug 1921,
C.S. Ludlow, 1 M, 1 M gen; 3 Aug 1923, J.B. Shropshire, 1 F [USNM]. Fort Sherman, 19 May
1939, J.B. Shropshire, 7 F [UCLA]. Madden Dam, 10 Jan 1943, H.C. Mathes, 2 M, 2 F, 3 L
[USNM]. Sabanas, 8 Oct 1921, J.B. Shropshire, 4 M, 3 F [USNM]. Chiriqui: Bambito, 5 Oct
1944, P. Galindo, 2 M, 2 F [USNM]. Cocle: El Valle, 5 June 1945, W.H.W. Komp, 2 M, 13 F,
3 P, 27 L [USNM], 2 M, 4 F [UCLA]. El Valle, Pozo de las Mozas, 13 Aug 1963 (PA 505),
1 pF (505-101) [UCLA]. Rio Faralloncito, Rio Hato, 12 Oct 1939, 2 F [UCLA], 2 L [USNM].
Penonome, 6 May 1950, P. Galindo, 1 lp [UCLA]. La Pintada, 30 Sept 1949, 1 M [GML].
Zavortink: New World Aedes 111
Colon: Caldera Island, Portobelo Bay, 4 Jan-8 Apr 1908, A.H. Jennings, 1 M, 4 F [USNM].
Portobelo, 4 Dec 1963 (PA 581), 1 IpF (581-104), 5 pM (581-102,103,105,107,112), 9 pF
(581-101,106,108,110,111,113-116), 1 F, 3 M gen [UCLA]. Darien: Pucro, Tacarcuna River
Valley, 14 June 1963 (PA 388), 1 IpF (388-107), 1 pM (388-106), 3 pF (388-101,103,105), 1 IF
(388-104), 1 M gen, 1 P, 12 L [UCLA]. Panama: Bella Vista, 15 Oct 1921, J.B. Shropshire, 3 M,
2 F; 18-30 June 1923, J.B. Shropshire, 30 M, 70 F [USNM]. Rio Chagres, A. Busck, 3 M [USNM].
Nuevo Sitio, 10 May 1949, 1 F [GML]. Pacora, La Zumbadora, 15 Feb 1963, (PA 97), 1 lpM
(97-101), 1 IpF (97-102) [UCLA]. Paitilla Point, 7 Oct 1936, 8 M, 4 F, 1 M gen; 7 Oct-9 Nov
1939, 4 M, 6 F,9 P, 11 L; 24 Aug 1941, 2M, 5 F, 1 M gen [UCLA]; 10-25 Feb 1922, J.B. Shrop-
shire, 9 M, 8 F; 1-5 Aug 1923, H.G. Dyar and R.C. Shannon, 1 M, 1 F; 15 July 1926, D.P. Curry, 1
M, 1 M gen; May 1935, 1 M gen, 17 L; 7 Oct 1939, 6 L; 24 Aug 1941, 1 lp; no date, 1 L [USNM].
San Carlos, Rio Teta, 22 Aug 1963 (PA 531), 6 IpM (531-102,104-106,112,124), 6 IpF (531-
107-111,129), 2 IF (531-103,117), 3 Ip (531-115,125,126), 2 M gen, 6 L [UCLA]. Province
not Specified: 1 F [GML], 19 Oct 1939, 1 M, 5 F [UCLA].
SURINAM. Suriname: Paramaribo, J. Bonne-Wepster, 2 M, 3 F, 1 M gen, 15 L [USNM].
Province not Specified: Mar 1946, H.H. Stage, 2 M, 4 F, 2 M gen, 4 L [USNM].
VENEZUELA. Aragua: Rancho Grande (9 km N), 28 July 1969, J. Pulido and J. Valencia
(VZ 283), 1 pM (283-101), 1 pF (283-102), 1 F; same data (VZ 284), 2 lpM (284-40,41), 1 lpF
(284-42), 1 lp (284-43), 1 M gen; (10 km N), 5 Aug 1969, J. Valencia (VZ 309), 1 IpM (309-11),
4 IpF (309-10,12-14), 3 pM (309-100,103,104), 2 pF (309-101,102), 4 M, 6 F, 1 M gen, 15 P,
8 L; (14 km N), 28 July 1969, J. Pulido and J. Valencia (VZ 281), 2 pM (281-100,101), 1 M gen,
2 L; same data (VZ 282), 1 IpF (282-10), 3 M, 3 F, 1 M gen, 7 P, 10 L; (20 km N), 5 Aug 1969, J.
Valencia (VZ 310), 1 IpF (310-10), 5 pM (310-100,102,103,105,110), 5 pF (310-101,104,107-
109), 1 lp (310-11), 13 M, 1 M gen, 16 F, 39 P, 16 L [UCLA]. Turmero, Macaro, 12 Aug 1969,
J. Valencia and J. Pulido (VZ 336), 1 F [UCLA]. Distrito Federal: Caracas, Nov 1937, P.J.
Anduze, 1 F, 1 L; P.J. Anduze, 1 M gen [USNM]. Territorio Amazonas: Puerto Ayacucho, May
1950, J. Maldonado-Capriles, 1 L [USNM].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. 2 M, 1 F [USNM].
Genus HAEMAGOGUS Williston
1896. Haemagogus Williston, 1896:271. TYPE SPECIES: Haemagogus splendens Williston,
1896, St. Vincent; monobasic.
For complete synonymy see Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959).
Subgenus CONOPOSTEGUS Dyar
1925. Conopostegus Dyar, 1925:141. TYPE SPECIES: Aedes leucocelaenus Dyar and Shannon,
1924; monobasic. — As subgenus of Aedes. The type species of Conopostegus was mis-
identified by Dyar; this case has not been referred to the International Commission on
Zoological Nomenclature because, as the name is used here, it does not matter if the
type species is leucocelaenus, the species designated by Dyar, or leucotaeniatus, the
only species he knew in the male, the sex upon which the subgenus was diagnosed.
Haemagogus in part of Lutz (1904a:13; 1904b:4); Dyar (1922c:195-196); Lima (1930:259-260);
Pinto (1932:295).
Stegoconops in part of Lutz (1905:101-102); Peryassu (1908: 169-172).
Aedes (Conopostegus) of Dyar (1925:137,141,143; 1928:153-154); Shannon (1931:147).
Aedes (Finlaya) in part of most authors.
Aedes (Gualteria) in part of Dyar (1918:73).
112 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
FEMALES. Dark scales of head, proboscis, palpus, legs, wing and abdomen with
slight coppery, green, blue or violet reflections; dark scales of mesoscutum with
dark bronzy brown, coppery or slight violet reflections. Head: Eyes broadly sep-
arated above antennae, the resulting space with broad flat silver scales. Integu-
ment dark brown to black. Frontal bristles absent. Orbital bristles moderately
numerous, mesal 3-5 pairs strongly developed, lateral 3-5 pairs moderately devel-
oped. Erect scales confined to single row on occiput, entirely dark brown to
black or some light. Decumbent scales broad, flat, blackish except for silver-
white in orbital line, usually in large patch dorsolaterally, and usually in med-
ian coronal line. Lateral and ventral surfaces with broad flat silver-white scales.
Clypeus moderately large, bare. Proboscis slender, longer than forefemur; entirely
dark scaled, with a few subbasal bristles. Palpus short, about 0.14-0.16 length of
proboscis; 3- or 4-segmented, segment 4 minute to small when present; segments
1-3 with bristles; entirely dark scaled. Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus with
inconspicuous fine setae and small dark scales; flagellar segment 1 longer than
2, slightly swollen distally, with inconspicuous small dark scales; flagellar segments
2-13 usually with 6 moderate bristles in basal whorl; each of flagellar segments
3-12 longer than preceding segment. Thorax: Integument brown to black. Acros-
tichal and dorsocentral bristles restricted to anterior promontory; prescutellar and
supraalar bristles numerous and well developed; 1 or 2 humeral bristles present;
lateral prescutal and posterior fossal bristles absent; 1 parascutellar bristle pres-
ent. Scutellum usually with 3 or 4 strong bristles on midlobe, 3 on lateral lobe.
Mesoscutum completely covered with scales except for relatively inconspicuous
anterior inner dorsocentral and median and lateral prescutellar bare spaces; back-
ground of moderately broad, pointed, predominantly flat, deep brown to black
scales; broader silver or silver-white scales in conspicuous pattern, as follows: (1)
very broad to moderately broad anterior acrostichal patch or acrostichal line that
becomes narrower or fades out posteriorly, (2) in large antealar patch above para-
tergite, and (3) usually in prescutellar line. Scutellum with broad flat scales; scales
of midlobe dark and silver or all dark, those of lateral lobe dark. Paratergite mod-
erately broad to broad, with broad flat silver scales. Apn slightly enlarged. Ppn
separated from mesoscutum by relatively weak suture. Meron moderately large.
Pleural bristles reduced in number on all sclerites, present on apn, ppn, ppl,
psp, pra, stp and upper mep; stp bristles present only in middle of sclerite and
near midcoxa; ssp and lower mep bristles absent. Pleuron with 3 nearly verti-
cal arcs of silver scales, the anterior extending from apn to forecoxa, the mid-
dle extending from ppn to midcoxa, and the posterior extending from antealar
area to hindcoxa. Upper inner portion of apn bare, lower portion with broad
flat silver scales; ppn with broad flat silver scales in posterior half; broad flat
silver scales on ppl, ssp, posterior portion of psp, on stp below pra, in nearly
vertical arc on stp from near ssp area to midcoxa, in long nearly vertical patch
on mep, and sometimes in large patch on pst; hypostigial area, pcx and meta-
meron bare. Legs: Hindcoxa larger than midcoxa, its base relatively close to up-
per edge of meron. Legs moderately long to long, the forefemur about 1.36-1.50
times distance from top of thorax to tip of midcoxa. All coxae with silver scales.
Femora dark scaled with white to silver-white scales in separate short to long
streaks at base of posterior and ventral surfaces of forefemur, in long streak on
ventral surface and patch on anterior surface at level of end of streak on mid-
femur, and on all but dorsal surface in basal 0.5-0.7 of hindfemur. Knee spots
present on at least midfemur and hindfemur; usually restricted to anterior sur-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 113
face on midfemur and, when present, on forefemur. Tibiae and tarsi entirely dark
scaled. Claws of foreleg and midleg with an acute submedian tooth, claws of hind-
leg simple. Wing: Entirely dark scaled. Plume scales on dorsum of Rs, R43, R2,
R; and sometimes less conspicuously on middle portion of M. Haltere: Scales
black and silver-white. Abdomen: Tergite I with numerous scales dorsally. Lat-
erotergite with large patch of silver-white scales. Tergites VI and VII completely
scaled. Outstanding scales absent. Tergites II-VII dark scaled with basolateral sil-
ver-white patch; silver-white patch on II and III usually extending to apex of
segment laterally; silver-white patch on V-VII extended dorsally, frequently form-
ing a medially broken or complete subbasal band on VI and VII. Sternites dark
scaled with basolateral silver-white patch, patches usually extending to near apex
of segment laterally, usually joining mate basally.
FEMALE GENITALIA (fig. 59). Segment VIII: Tergite narrowed apically, length
along midline about 0.65-0.70 of tergite VII; distal 0.87-0.93 with scales and bris-
tles. Sternite long; about 1.4-1.6 length of tergite VIII, broader distally; distal
margin straight to slightly rounded; all but basolateral area and extreme base with
bristles; basolateral area with scales; bristles more numerous along midline distally
and distal margin, predominantly weakly developed distally, some proximal bris-
tles moderately developed, elongate. Tergite IX: Well developed, divided distally,
more or less V-shaped. Maximum length about 0.53-0.57 of tergite VIII; mod-
erately to strongly sclerotized, without setae. Insula: Weakly sclerotized; connect-
ed to sigma; with 2-4 pairs of moderately developed setae. Cercus: Relatively
short, length about 0.61-0.67 of tergite VIII; compressed; apex truncate in lat-
eral view; bristles numerous, several apical ones strongly developed; a few scales
present. Postgenital Plate: Moderately long and broad, length about 0.49-0.62 of
tergite VIII; index about 1.4; apex straight or very slightly emarginate in ventral
aspect; distal portion with numerous weakly developed bristles; basal median lon-
gitudinal apodeme not developed. Cowl: Strongly sclerotized. Atrial plates ab-
sent. Sigma: Connected to cowl; weakly to moderately sclerotized. Basal portion
of spermathecal duct strongly sclerotized. Spermathecae 3, strongly sclerotized,
more or less spherical, 1 slightly enlarged.
MALES. Essentially as in females except for sexual characters. Head: Clypeus
much smaller than in females. Proboscis slender. Palpus about 0.67-0.94 length
of proboscis; 5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 ankylosed and long, making up 0.56-
0.62 length of palpus; segment 4 short, 0.18-0.22 length of palpus; segment 5
short, 0.15-0.17 length of palpus; palpus slender; straight throughout or slightly
upturned apically; apex of segment 3 and all of segments 4 and 5 with very few
bristles; entirely dark scaled. Antenna shorter than proboscis; torus much enlarged,
without scales or with inconspicuous small scales; flagellum strongly plumose, seg-
ments 1-12 with very numerous long bristles; flagellar segment 1 slightly elon-
gate, with small dark scales; flagellar segments 12 and 13 elongate, the penulti-
mate longer, the 2 combined shorter than total length of first 11 segments. Legs:
Claws of foreleg and midleg enlarged, unequal; larger claw of foreleg with large
blunt submedian tooth, smaller claw with acute subbasal tooth; larger claw of
midleg with or without large blunt submedian tooth, smaller claw usually with
acute subbasal tooth. Claws of hindleg small, simple. Abdomen: Apical segments
and genitalia not bent ventrad. |
MALE GENITALIA. Not unusually colored; various shades of straw, tan and
brown. Segment VIII: Tergite moderately long, 0.72-0.98 length of sternite; ex-
serted, apical 0.61-0.70 scaled. Segment IX: Poorly developed dorsally, the ter-
114 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
gite short; middorsal portion of tergite absent, membranous or well sclerotized;
tergite without setae, sometimes with pair of membranous lobes; sternite large,
with 5-9 setae distally. Sidepiece: Well developed, short, conical, dorsal surface
constricted distad of middle; mesal surface membranous from base to apex; basal
tergomesal area conspicuously swollen, with large area of moderately long setae;
apical lobe not developed, but sometimes with subapical tuft of setae distad of
dorsal constriction; median sternomesal tuft and sclerite absent; sternomesal sur-
face with long broad striated scales; dorsolateral surface with moderately long se-
tae and scales, lateral and ventral surfaces with moderately long to long setae and
scales; sternomesal surface usually with a few enlarged setae ventrad or laterad
of specialized scales. Claspette: Well developed; stem long, bowed outward in mid-
dle in dorsal aspect, curved dorsad apically; spiculose; with 1 or 2 short to mod-
erately long fine setae in basal portion and 1-3 short and fine to long and strong
setae distally at level of end of spiculose portion; filament moderately long, sim-
ple and slightly flattened or expanded and sometimes with triangular barb. Clasp-
er: Simple, short, broadest at or beyond base, curved at apex; without wrinkles
or with weak wrinkles; with at least a few spicules basally; apex of inner surface
with alveolus or papilla that only sometimes bears a seta; apical spiniform long,
0.43-0.55 length of clasper. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderate to large, without
teeth, but with a pair of sclerotized flaps on the sternal surface apically; obcon-
ical or pandurate; tip excavated, not beaked. Proctiger: Strongly developed, un-
usually long in dorsal aspect, the basolateral sclerotization nearly horizontal; para-
proct well sclerotized, with a broad curved striated knob at apex; cercal setae
3-8, short and fine or 1 proximal enlarged.
PUPAE. Cephalothorax: Weakly to moderately pigmented, usually lighter ven-
trally. Hair 5-C strongly developed, long, as long as or longer than distance from
its alveolus to base of trumpet. Trumpet: Light to dark brown basally, yellowish
apically; slender, fusiform, cylindrical or slightly broadening from base to apex;
tracheoid sculpturing poorly developed in basal 0.06-0.10; reticulate sculpturing
weak to moderate. Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented. Tergites II-VIl
without a transverse ridge anteriorly. Hair 1-II-VII moderately to strongly devel-
oped, subequal on all segments or longer and stronger on middle or more pos-
terior segments, 1-6b. Hair 2-III-V in line with or laterad of hair 1 of correspond-
ing segment. Hair 5-IV,V 0.6-3.0 length of corresponding segment; 5-VII long to
very long, 1-5b, longer and stronger than 4-VII. Hair 6-III-VI moderately long
to long, fine, subequal on all segments or 6-VI slightly longer and stronger; 6-VII
short to moderately long, fine to strong. Hair 8-VI,VII ventral. Hair 9-III-VI short,
fine, subequal on all segments, usually cephalad of level of hair 6 of correspond-
ing segment; 9-VII cephalad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 1-5 long pri-
mary branches; 9-VIII at or mesad of caudolateral angle of segment, with 2-12
long to very long primary branches. Hair 10-VI usually far mesad of 11-VI. Ter-
minal Segments: Male genital lobe moderately large, about 1.0-1.2 length of ter-
gite VIII. Paddle: Shape varied, but always longer than broad. Apex pointed to
deeply emarginate. Midrib conspicuous to apex; without wrinkles near apex. With-
out long marginal spicules. Hair 1-P very strongly developed, very long, single to
multiple.
LARVAE. Head: Lightly to moderately pigmented, yellowish to brown, with
darker collar and lighter ocular area; sometimes mottled dorsally. Labial plate
subquadrate. Hair 1-C stout. Hairs 4,6-C removed from labrum. Hair 4-C strongly
developed, 10-20b; mesad of 1-C and cephalad of level of 6-C. Hair 5-C single
Zavortink: New World Aedes 115
or double, mesad or laterad of 6-C. Hair 6-C single or double, in line with or
laterad of 1-C. Hair 7-C 2-9b. Hair 15-C very long, 2-4b. Mental plate with 9-
11 (7-11) teeth on each side of median tooth. Antenna: Moderately to strongly
pigmented, uniform or lightened apically. Shaft with small spicules. Hair 1-A long,
usually single (single or double). Thorax: Pigmentation unknown. Integument with-
out conspicuous spicules. Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P free or joined. Hair 1-M,I mod-
erately long, branched. Hair 4-P 2-10b. Hair 5-P 1-3b; hair 5-M single. Hair 11-
P,M,T enlarged, moderately long, 3,4b (2-4), similar to 9-P. Hairs 13-T and 14-
M moderately to strongly developed, 3-12b. Abdomen: Hair 1-I moderately to
strongly developed, 4-11b; hair 1-I[V,V strongly developed, 1-7b. Hair 2-III-V ap-
parently in line with or laterad of hair 1 of corresponding segment, 3-10b. Hair
3-VII strongly developed, long, single (single or double). Hair 5-II-V moderately
to strongly developed, 4-11b. Hair 6-III-V single or double. Hair 9-III-V 3-5b.
Hair 11-I moderately to strongly developed, 4-12b. Hair 12-I present. Hair 13-l
moderately to strongly developed, 3-9b; hair 13-IV,V strongly developed, 3-9b;
hair 13-VI strongly developed, 3-6b, displaced caudad, at about same level as 10-
VI. Segment VIII: Hairs 1 and 2 separated. Hair 1 moderately to strongly devel-
oped, 2-7b. Comb scales moderate in size; with single minutely fringed spine;
few (5-9) in a single even row. Siphon: Moderately to strongly pigmented, light
to dark brown except for darker basal band and sometimes lighter apex. Mod-
erately long; index about 2.5-3.9. Acus distinct, free or attached, or indistinct,
fused with base of siphon. Pecten teeth with 1-4 basal denticles; 12-19 in a more
or less straight even row; apical teeth not detached. Hair 1-S arising distad of
pecten; moderately to strongly developed, 2-4b. Anal Segment: Saddle moderately
large to large; with spines on caudal margin; moderately to strongly pigmented,
light to dark brown with darker basal band. Hair 1-X moderately to strongly de-
veloped, long, 1-4b (1-7). Hair 2-X 2-5b. Hair 3-X single. Ventral brush (4-X)
moderately well developed, with 5 or 6 pairs of hairs; all hairs or all but most
proximal 1 or 2 hairs arising from strongly sclerotized boss; hair 4a-X long, 2-5b;
hairs 4b,4c-X double. Anal gills tapered distally; dorsal and ventral subequal in
length or dorsal slightly longer than ventral, 0.9-2.6 length of anal saddle.
DISCUSSION. The subgenus Conopostegus is separated from the other mem-
bers of the genus Haemagogus as follows: most conspicuously in the adults by
(1) the absence of metallic scales on the mesoscutum, (2) the presence of silver
acrostichal scales, (3) the presence of prescutellar bristles, (4) the presence of
well developed postspiracular bristles, (5) the presence of 2 very conspicuous, near-
ly vertical bands of silver scales on the pleuron, and (6) the presence of a patch
of silver-white scales on the anterior surface of the midfemur about 0.5-0.7 the
distance from its base; in the male genitalia by (1) the excavated, rather than
beaked or produced, tip of the aedeagus, and (2) the presence of a pair of scle-
rotized flaps or plates on the sternal surface of the aedeagus; in the pupae by
the strongly developed and long hairs 5-C and 1-P; and, in the larvae possibly by
the combination of (1) the absence of spicules on the integument of the tho-
rax and abdomen, (2) the presence of hair 12-I, (3) the single row of 5-9 comb
scales, and (4) the strongly sclerotized boss of the ventral brush.
Although numerous authors (Dyar and Shannon, 1924:484; Dyar, 1922c:195-
196, 1925:137 and 1928:154; Lima, 1930:259-260; Edwards, 1932:178; Komp,
1938:266) have commented on the close relationship between /eucocelaenus and
Haemagogus or included it in that genus, this species has remained in Aedes (Fin-
laya) since Edwards’ catalog (1932:154). On the basis of the very numerous sim-
116 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
ilarities in all stages between leucocelaenus and Haemagogus, | am, however, re-
moving leucocelaenus and the species near it from Aedes, resurrecting the name
Conopostegus for them, and treating Conopostegus as a subgenus of Haemagogus.
This placement is provisional, pending a revision of the metallic Haemagogus. The
species of Conopostegus are most similar to some species presently placed in
the subgenera Longipalpifer and Stegoconops.
This subgenus contains 4 named species that are known in all stages and 4
unnamed forms that are known from 1 or more females each. The named spe-
cies are most reliably separated in the larval and pupal stages and least reliably
separated as females. The unnamed forms differ from the described species by
1 or more unique developments of the females and, I am quite sure, represent
additional species. They are not named because of inadequate material.
The relationships of the species in this group are, for the most part, not obvi-
ous. Haemagogus leucotaeniatus has several notable features in the male genitalia
and larva and leucophoebus has several in the male genitalia, pupa and larva; these
species may not be closely related to each other or to leucocelaenus or clarki.
Although these last 2 species differ in many respects, they agree in so many others
that I believe they are related. The unnamed species 21 and 22 are possibly re-
lated to leucotaeniatus and the unnamed species 26 = 27 are definitely akin
to clarki.
The immature stages of Conopostegus are found in treeholes, bamboo inter-
nodes and artificial containers. Females have been collected in horse traps and
biting humans.
The subgenus Conopostegus extends from Honduras to Argentina and Brazil.
The group is too poorly known to make any meaningful generalizations about
the sympatry or allopatry of the included species, but /eucotaeniatus and clarki
do occur together in Costa Rica and Panama and the large and small Colombian
forms (species 21 and 26) have been taken in the same collection.
Because of the difficulty of determining what species was actually involved,
numerous papers reporting Jeucocelaenus from localities in South America have
not been included in the literature citations and the localities have not been in-
cluded in the Additional Records From the Literature section of any species.
KEYS TO SPECIES
FEMALES
| Mesoscutum with broad silver acrostichal patch in anterior 0.25-0.45; ppl
usually with | (1 or 2) long strong dark bristle and 1 (O-2) weak light
bristle; knee spot of hindleg extended basad along ventral surface of fe-
mur; mep scale patch simple, without any caudal extension . . wie
Mesoscutum with narrow to broad acrostichal line that extends beviout!
anterior 0.50; ppl usually with more numerous bristles and some of long
strong bristles light in color; knee spot of hindleg not extended basad
along ventral surface of femur and/or mep scale patch with caudal ex-
TONG gaa Oe CU ee rl PE AO et bee TEL REGS . ho
2(1). Forefemur without white line extending basad from apex along ventral sur-
face; knee spot of midleg not extended basad along ventral surface of
3(2).
4(1).
5(4).
6(5).
7(6).
Aa):
Zavortink: New World Aedes 117
femur; lateral prescutellar silver line absent or weak; dorsolateral silver
patch of head usually very large . . . i kate 2S ChE
Forefemur with white line extending basad: from apex along ventral sur-
face; knee spot of midleg extended basad along ventral surface of femur;
lateral prescutellar silver line present or absent; dorsolateral silver patch
ofthead small, tounedétate in sizei sg. 00k Bye eS Ae a
Lateral prescutellar silver line well developed, conspicuous. . ;
ne . 26. Small Colombian form
Lateral presoutellar silver tine absent . . . . . 27. Peruvian lowland form
Lateral prescutellar silver line scarsely separated from its mate, the 2 form-
ing a median prescutellar line; knee spot of midleg and hindleg extended
basad along ventral surface of femora . . . . 21. Large Colombian form
Lateral prescutellar silver line distinctly separated from its mate; knee spot
of midleg and hindleg usually not extended basad along ventral surface
of demoriut an checscaccusieinic? pate te ented. emake « tee
Pst with large oblique patch of scales; mep scale patch with a long caudal
extension from dorsal end; ee without knee spot.
; .22. Peruvian highland form
Pst usually a only a ae scales 1 near ppl; mep scale patch with a shorter
caudal extension or foreleg with a knee spot on anterior surface. . . .6
Forefemur with small knee spot on anterior surface; mep scale patch with
long caudal extension from upperend. . .. . . . 20. leucotaeniatus
Forefemur without knee spot; mep scale patch simple or with short to
moderately long caudal extension from upperend . ....... ./7
Mep scale patch with a moderately long caudal extension from upper end;
erect scales of head entirely dark brown to blackish; pp/ with 2 or 3
long strong bristles . . . . . . . 23. leucophoebus
Mep scale patch simple or with. a short caudal extension from upper end;
erect scales of head sometimes entirely light brown or partially white;
ppl with 1 or 2 long strong bristles (fig.59). . . . . 24. leucocelaenus
MALES
(Species 21, 22, 26 and 27 unknown)
Stem of claspette with 2 or 3 long strong setae distally; tergite IX with
a pair of large membranous lobes; aedeagus large, more or less obconical
(fig. $3), ernscark . . . 20. leucotaeniatus
Stem of claspette with ied dies an svatescaiale long fine setae distally;
tergite IX without membranous lobes; aedeagus moderate in size, more
Cudesceantiinas eaten er mado iiniichies Ge Aenean. sadeiiare awe
Stem of claspette with 1 short preapical seta; sidepiece without subapical
tuft of setae; expanded lateral nema of serene IX joined by strongly
sclerotized bar (fig. 57) . . . 2 . . 23. leucophoebus
118
3(2).
2(1).
3(1).
2( 1).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Stem of claspette with 1-3 moderately long preapical setae; sidepiece with
weakly developed subapical tuft of 2-5 setae from prominent tubercles
along tergomesal edge; expanded lateral portions of tergite IX joined,
ihadtt call <by. weak Wesplerotize@astrie esl hase) Jods Rat. eeias ole 1s 3
Larger claw of midleg with large blunt submedian tooth; tergite VIII usu-
ally with 2-4 rows of enlarged setae along distal margin; clasper usually
not swollen or slightly swollen in middle portion (fig. 60).
24. leucocelaenus
ines ties of midleg Tata! aah dian. tooth: tergite VIII usually with
1 irregular row of enlarged setae along distal margin; clasper usually dis-
tinctlhyeswollemmeéar based fie) 62) i.e yal ec Scho kc ecce: dgueda 25. clanki
PUPAE
(Species 21, 22, 26 and 27 unknown)
Primary branches of float hair (1-1) with secondary branches; 5-III weakly
developed, short, arising nearer lateral edge of segment than to 1-II];
hair 6-VII much stronger than 6-III-VI .. . ae
Primary branches of float hair predominantly sinple: 5 tT eiouely devel
oped, long, arising near 1-III; hair 6-VII not more strongly developed
than 6-III-VI ;
Paddle large, with normal narrow dark midrib; hairs 1-P and 1-3-C single
(fie-"55) 1 ooh . . 20. leucotaeniatus
Paddle small, with ‘broad colorless midrib: eins 1-P and 1-3-C multiple
CeO ete ee, a Pe ae er ea OS eneophoebus
Float hair with 9-12 (7-14) long branches; paddle slightly asymmetrical; mid-
dorsal portion of tergite I not more strongly pigmented than segment
ll dig. 60) -. . . 24. leucocelaenus
Float hair with 3-6 very long branches: paddle strongly asymmetrical; mid-
dorsal portion of tergite I more strongly pigmented than segment II
CHO 7) RS re CE Ee et RO AS a Bee” ATI 25: elarki
LARVAE
(Species 21, 22, 26 and 27 unknown)
Ventral brush (4-X) with 6 pairs of hairs; hairs 5,6-C single; 5-P single and
TP 3,40 Chie. S56) Fo aS. . . . . 20. leucotaeniatus
Ventral brush with 5 pairs of hairs: ‘hair 6C and sometimes 5-C double;
5-P single (single or ae ae and 7-P double ee or ee or both
SPO ts Sek Se AEN he : LS Sean:
Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P very strongly joined and 5,7-P 3,4b; hair 14-P
24-26b; hairs 2,4a-X double (fig.58) . .. . . . . 23. leucophoebus
Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P free or but weakly joined, 5-P usually single (sin-
gle or double) and 7-P ical double erie Or ee 14-P 3-6b;
hairs 2,4a-X 3-5b .... : ae wud
Zavortink: New World Aedes 119
3(2). Siphon usually with distinct small to large acus; hair 6-III-V double; 7-II
moderately long, moderately strong, 5-8b, its tubercle never joined with
that:of6-IE. (ig. 61) Uo Sows. . . . . 24, leucocelaenus
Siphon usually without distinct pris chibign? acus; hair 6-III-V usually sin-
gle (single or double); 7-II long, strong, igually 1-3b (1-5), its tubercle
frequently joined to that of 6-II by sclerotization (fig. 63) . . .25. clarki
20. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucotaeniatus (Komp)
Figs. 54-56
1938. Aedes leucotaeniatus Komp, 1938:261-263. TYPE: Holotype male with associated geni-
talia (1689), Comacho, Canal Zone, Panama, 22 Apr 1922, J.B. Shropshire [USNM].
Aedes (Finlaya) leucotaeniatus of Galindo, Trapido and Carpenter (1950:547,566); Galindo,
Carpenter and Trapido (1951:120-121; 1953:529,531,536-538,540,541; 1955:160,161,163);
Knight and Marks (1952:515,518,542,570); Lane (1953:685); Galindo and Trapido (1955:
546); Trapido, Galindo and Carpenter (1955:534); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959: 166).
Haemagogus (Stegoconops) leucomelas of Dyar (1922c:195-196).
Aedes (?Gaulteria) leucomelas in part of Dyar (1918:73).
Aedes leucomelas in part of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:810-812).
Aedes (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus in part of Dyar (1925:137,141,143; 1928:153-154).
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus in part of Edwards (1932:148,154,178).
Aedes leucocelaenus in part of Dyar and Shannon (1924:484).
FEMALE. Wing: 3.55 mm. Proboscis: 2.94 mm. Forefemur: 2.64 mm. Abdo-
men: about 3.0 mm. Large species. Head: Erect scales entirely dark brown or
blackish. Dorsolateral silver patch large. Coronal silver line usually well developed
and complete. Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales in a long narrow line in anterior
0.55-0.70 that fades out posteriorly. Lateral prescutellar silver line well developed,
conspicuous, usually distinctly separated from its mate. Midlobe of scutellum with
silver scales. Ppl with 2 or 3 (1-4) long strong light or dark bristles and 1-3 (1-5)
weak light bristles. Pst usually with only a few scales near ppl. Mep scale patch
with a long caudal extension from upper end. Legs: Femora without a white line
extending basad from apex along ventral surface. Knee spot small and restricted
to anterior surface on foreleg, moderately large on midleg, large on hindleg, not
extended basad on midleg or hindleg.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus about 0.87-
0.92 length of proboscis. Legs: Larger claw of midleg with large blunt submedian
tooth.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 55). Segment VIII: Tergite about 0.72 length of ster-
nite; with several rows of enlarged setae. Segment IX: Lateral portions of ter-
gite joined by relatively broad, moderately well sclerotized strip; tergite with a
pair of large membranous spiculose lobes extending mesocaudad. Sidepiece: Basal
tergomesal area with very numerous setae, the more ventral gently curved dor-
sad apically; subapical tuft of setae conspicuous, well developed; specialized scales
of sternomesal surface numerous (at least 15), predominantly narrowly lanceo-
late, longest ones longer than clasper; general vestiture of scales and setae very
dense, basal portion of tergal surface with numerous long setae directed over IX-T.
Claspette: Stem with 2 or 3 long strong distal setae. Filament expanded, con-
torted, with a distinct triangular barb near base. Clasper: Middle portion swol-
120 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Jen. Phallosome: Aedeagus large, more or less obconical. Proctiger: Apical knob
of paraproct with numerous (about 24) fine striations.
PUPA (fig. 55). Abdomen: about 3.8 mm. Trumpet: 0.54 mm. Paddle: 0.384
mm. Cephalothorax: Pigmentation lighter ventrally, leg cases not as deeply pig-
mented as middorsal area. Hairs 1-3-C usually single. Hair 5-C single or double,
extending to or slightly beyond base of trumpet. Trumpet: Reticulate sculptur-
ing usually moderately strong. Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented; pos-
terior segments usually uniformly pigmented, lighter than anterior segments, but
sometimes with small anterior middorsal area darkened; middorsal portion of seg-
ment I not more strongly pigmented than segment II. Float hair (1-I) with 9-
14 (6-16) long, secondarily branched primary branches; 1-II-VII moderately to
strongly developed, usually single or double and subequal on all segments or slight-
ly longer and stronger on middle or more posterior segments, sometimes 3-8b,
especially on anterior segments. Hair 5-II,III weakly developed, single, nearer lat-
eral edge than to hair 1 of corresponding segment; 5-IV 1.0-1.2 length of seg-
ment IV, usually single (1-3b), located about midway between hair | and lat-
eral edge of segment; 5-V-VII usually single (1-3b). Hair 6-VII much stronger than
6-IlI-VI. Hair 9-VIII with 4-6 branches, the more central branches sometimes elon-
gate. Paddle: Large, inner and outer parts subequal in width, distal portion nearly
symmetrical. Apex rounded, pointed or produced. Midrib normal, narrow, dark,
extending to or nearly to apex. Hair 1-P single.
LARVA (fig. 56). Head: 0.88 mm. Siphon: 0.98 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.42 mm.
Head: Hairs 5,6-C single. Hair 7-C 3-6b. Thorax: Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P weakly
to strongly joined. Hair 4-P 6-8b. Hair 5-P single. Hair 7-P 3,4b. Hair 14-P 4-
10b. Abdomen: Hair 1-llI-V usually 2-4b (1-6). Hair 6-III-V double. Hair 7-Il
moderately long and moderately strong, 5-8b, its tubercle never joined with that
of 6-II. Siphon: Index about 2.7-2.9. Acus distinct, large. Pecten teeth usually
with 1 or 2 large and 1-3 small denticles. Hair 1-S strongly developed, long, ex-
tending beyond apex of siphon, double. Anal Segment: Hair 2-X 3-5b. Ventral
brush with 6 pairs of hairs; all hairs arising from boss; hair 4a-X 3-5b.
SYSTEMATICS. Haemagogus leucotaeniatus is distinguished from clarki, leuco-
celaenus and leucophoebus as follows: in the female by (1) the small knee spot
on the anterior surface of the forefemur, and (2) the long caudal extension from
the upper end of the mesepimeral scale patch; in the male by (1) the large mem-
branous lobes on tergite IX, (2) the strongly developed subapical tuft of setae
on the sidepiece, (3) the long strong distal setae on the claspette stem, (4) the
expanded, contorted and barbed claspette filament, and (5) the large obconical
aedeagus; in the pupa by (1) the large, distally symmetrical paddle with a nor-
mal midrib, (2) hair 5-III which is weakly developed and single, and (3) the 9-
14 (6-16) long, secondarily branched primary branches of the float hair (1-I); and
in the larva by (1) the single hairs 5,6-C, (2) the combination of a single hair
5-P and a 3- or 4-branched 7-P, (3) the strongly developed, long 1-S, and (4)
the ventral brush which has 6 pairs of hairs.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of leucotaeniatus have been collected in treeholes
and females have been collected biting humans and in horse traps.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). Haemagogus leucotaeniatus is known from Costa Rica
and Panama. Material examined: 58 specimens; 3 males, 33 females, 8 larvae, 14
pupae; 14 individual rearings (8 larval, 6 pupal).
PANAMA. Canal Zone: Camacho, 1 June 1922, J.B. Shropshire, 1 F [USNM]; | M gen
[USNM] . Chiva Chiva, 4 May 1945, 1 F [UCLA]. Empire, 21 Aug, 1 F [USNM]. Fort Sherman,
Zavortink: New World Aedes 121
29 June 1950, S.J. Carpenter (4620), 1 pM (4620-11), 1 pF (4620-12), 1 M gen [UCLA].
Colon: Caldera Island, Portobelo Bay, 23 May 1908, R.L. Turner, 1 F [USNM]. Darien: Pucro,
Tacarcuna River Valley, 5 July 1963 (PA 438), 2 pF (438-104,105); 8 July 1963 (PA 442), 1 pF
(442-106) [UCLA]. Panama: Cerro La Victoria, 11 May 1949-3 Jan 1950, 1 lpM (D-8), 2 lpF
(B-14, D-4), 2 F [GML]. Pacora, 9 June 1949-3 Aug 1950, 13 F; 29 June 1950, S.J. Carpenter
(4681), 1 lpF (4681-2A), 1 F (4681-2B); 6 July 1950, S.J. Carpenter (4874), 2 lpF (4874-1,
4874); same data (4893), 1 IpF (4893-4); 20 July 1950, S.J. Carpenter (5121), 1 IlpF (5121-2);
3 Aug 1950, S.J. Carpenter (5345), 1 pM (5345-4), 1 M gen [UCLA]. Province not Specified:
Buena Vista, 20 Sept 1949, S.J. Carpenter, 1 F [UCLA].
LOCALITY UNKNOWN. 1 F (514) [USNM]; 1 M gen (00029) [GML].
Additional Records From the Literature
COSTA RICA. (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido, 1953:531; Galindo and Trapido, 1955:546;
Trapido, Galindo and Carpenter, 1955:534).
21. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) sp., Large Colombian form
?Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus in part of Forattini (1965:378-382).
?Aedes leucocelaenus in part of Komp (1936:62; 1938:260,261,263-266; 1956:37-38); Bugher,
Boshell-Manrique, Roca-Garcia and Osorno-Mesa (1944:45,47,48).
?Aedes (Finlaya) n.sp. of Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido (1953:531).
FEMALE. Wing: 3.45 mm. Proboscis: 2.80 mm. Forefemur: 2.43 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.9 mm. Large species. Head: Erect scales entirely dark brown or
blackish. Dorsolateral silver patch large. Coronal silver line usually well developed
and complete. Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales in a long narrow line that weak-
ens posteriorly but extends to prescutellar space. Lateral prescutellar silver line well
developed, conspicuous, very slightly separated from its mate and forming a med-
ian prescutellar line. Midlobe of scutellum with silver scales. Ppl with 2 or 3 long
strong light or dark bristles and 2 weak light bristles. Pst with only a few scales
near ppl. Mep scale patch with a long caudal extension from upper end. Legs:
Femora without a white line extending basad from apex along ventral surface.
Knee spot absent from foreleg, large on midleg and hindleg, extended basad along
ventral surface on midleg and hindleg.
MALE, PUPA, LARVA. Unknown.
SYSTEMATICS. The large Colombian form is similar to leucotaeniatus and the
Peruvian highland form but differs from these species in the female by (1) the
lateral prescutellar scale lines of the mesoscutum which are very close to each
other and form a median prescutellar line, and (2) the basally extended knee
spot on the midfemur and hindfemur. It also differs from Jeucotaeniatus by the
absence of a knee spot on the forefemur and from the Peruvian highland form
by the absence of a large patch of scales on the prosternum.
BIONOMICS. The habitat of the immatures is unknown. The females were pre-
sumably obtained in biting-landing collections. The species occurs with the small
Colombian form “in the mountains by the coast.”
The yellow fever isolation reported by Bugher et al. (1944:45,47,48) may have
been from this species.
DISTRIBUTION. The large Colombian form is known from 2 unspecified lo-
calities in Colombia. Material examined: 3 females.
COLOMBIA. Locality Unknown: “In the mountains by the coast,” 22 Dec 1936, J.A. Kerr,
1 F; “Minas,” 12 Apr-12 May 1936, 2 F [UCLA].
122 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
22. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) sp., Peruvian highland form
Fig. 54
FEMALE. Wing: 3.12 mm. Proboscis: 2.45 mm. Forefemur: 2.31 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.6 mm. Moderate in size. Head: Visible erect scales all dark brown.
Dorsolateral silver patch large. Coronal silver line well developed and complete.
Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales in a long narrow line that weakens posteriorly
but extends to prescutellar space. Lateral prescutellar silver line well developed,
separated from its mate. Midlobe of scutellum with silver scales. Pp! with 3 long
strong light bristles and 1 weak light bristle. Pst with large oblique patch of scales.
Mep scale patch with a long caudal extension from upper end. Legs: Femora with-
out a white line extending basad from apex along ventral surface. Knee spot ab-
sent on foreleg, small on midleg, large on hindleg, not extended basad on mid-
leg or hindleg. :
MALE, PUPA, LARVA. Unknown.
SYSTEMATICS. The Peruvian highland form is similar to leucotaeniatus and
the large Colombian form but may be distinguished from both these species in
the female by the large patch of scales on the prosternum. It is further distin-
guished from leucotaeniatus by the absence of a knee spot on the forefemur and
from the large Colombian form by (1) the separated lateral prescutellar scale lines
of the mesoscutum, and (2) the knee spot of the midfemur and hindfemur, which
is not extended basad along the ventral surface.
BIONOMICS. Unknown.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). The Peruviari highland form is known from the up-
per Amazon drainage in the Peruvian Andes. Material examined: | female.
PERU. Cajamarca: Bagua, 10-15 Jan 1954, W. Ebeling, 1 F [UCLA].
23. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucophoebus
(Galindo, Carpenter & Trapido)
Figs. 54,57,58
1953. Aedes (Finlaya) leucophoebus Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido, 1953:535-536. TYPE:
Holotype male (1763.2) with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia, Feijo, Acre,
Brazil, 4 Aug 1949 [FH].
Aedes (Finlaya) leucophoebus of Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:165).
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus in part of Knight and Marks (1952:517,518,542,569); Lane (1953:
682-685).
Aedes leucocelaenus in part of Kumm and Cerqueira (1951:195-200).
FEMALE. Wing: 3.46 mm. Proboscis: 2.72 mm. Forefemur: 2.46 mm. Abdo-
men: about 3.1 mm. Large species. Head: Erect scales entirely dark brown. Dor-
solateral silver patch very large. Coronal silver line well developed, conspicuous.
Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales in a broad line of unknown length, but extend-
ing throughout at least anterior 0.5 of mesoscutum. Lateral prescutellar silver line
well developed, conspicuous, distinctly separated from its mate. Midlobe of scu-
tellum with silver scales. Ppl with 3 long strong light or dark bristles and 1 weak
light or dark bristle. Pst with scales only near ppl. Mep scale patch with a mod-
erately long caudal extension from upper end. Legs: Femora without a white line
Zavortink: New World Aedes 123
extending basad from apex along ventral surface. Knee spot absent on foreleg,
large on midleg and hindleg, not extended basad on either midleg or hindleg.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus about 0.84
length of proboscis. Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales in a conspicuous broad line
extending to prescutellar space. Legs: Larger claw of midleg with large blunt sub-
median tooth.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 57). Segment VII: Tergite about 0.92 length of ster-
nite; apparently with 3 or 4 rows of enlarged setae along distal margin. Segment
IX: Lateral portions of tergite joined by strongly sclerotized bar; tergite without
membranous lobes. Sidepiece: Basal tergomesal area with numerous setae, the more
ventral gently curved dorsad; subapical tuft not developed; specialized scales of
sternomesal surface moderately numerous (7-9), predominantly broadly elliptic,
the longest as long as clasper; general vestiture of scales and setae apparently quite
dense, basal portion of tergal surface apparently with numerous moderately long
setae directed over IX-T. Claspette: Stem with 1 short fine distal seta. Filament
expanded, especially basally, but apparently not contorted and without triangu-
lar barb. Clasper: Without distinct swollen area. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderate
in size, more or less pandurate. Proctiger: Not seen.
PUPA (fig. 57). Abdomen: about 3.4 mm. Trumpet: 0.49 mm. Paddle: 0.51
mm. Cephalothorax: Pigmentation lighter ventrally, leg cases not as strongly pig-
mented as middorsal area. Hairs 1-3-C multiple (7-19b). Hair 5-C 3b, extending
to base of trumpet. Trumpet: Reticulate sculpturing moderately strong. Abdo-
men: Moderately pigmented; posterior segments uniformly pigmented, lighter than
anterior segments; middorsal portion of segment I not more strongly pigmented
than segment II. Float hair (1-1) with 17-19 moderately long, secondarily branch-
ed primary branches; 1-II-VII moderately to strongly developed, longer and strong-
er on middle segments, 3-5b. Hair 5-II,III weakly developed, 2,3b, nearer lateral
edge than to hair 1 of corresponding segment; 5-IV 0.6-0.7 length of segment
IV, 3-5b, located about midway between hair 1 and lateral edge of segment; 5-
V-VII 3-5b. Hair 6-VII much stronger than 6-III-VI. Hair 9-VIII with 11 or 12
equally long branches. Paddle: Small, outer part slightly wider than inner part,
distal portion nearly symmetrical. Apex rounded. Midrib represented by broad
colorless strip extending to apex. Hair 1-P 31-35b.
LARVA (fig. 58). Head: 0.78 mm. Siphon: 0.86 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.38 mm.
Head: Hairs 5,6-C double. Hair 7-C 8,9b. Thorax: Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P strong-
ly joined. Hair 4-P 10b. Hairs 5,7-P 3,4b. Hair 14-P 24-26b. Abdomen: Hair 1-
III-V 5,6b. Hair 6-III-V double. Hair 7-II moderately long and moderately strong,
7,8b, its tubercle never joined with that of 6-II. Siphon: Index about 2.5-2.6.
Acus distinct, small. Pecten teeth usually with 1 or 2 large and 1-3 small den-
ticles. Hair 1-S moderately developed, moderately long, 3b. Anal Segment: Hair
2-X double. Ventral brush with 5 pairs of hairs; most proximal 2 hairs basad of
boss; 4a-X double.
SYSTEMATICS. Haemagogus leucophoebus may be separated from the other
described species of the subgenus Conopostegus as follows: in the female by the
combination of (1) the dark brown head scales, (2) the relatively numerous pro-
pleural bristles, (3) the moderately long caudal extension from the upper end of
the mesepimeral scale patch, and (4) the absence of a knee spot on the fore-
femur; in the male by (1) the strongly sclerotized bar connecting the lateral por-
tions of tergite IX, (2) the total absence of a subapical tuft of setae on the side-
124 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
piece, (3) the single short fine distal seta on the claspette stem, and (4) the basal-
ly expanded but not contorted or barbed claspette filament; in the pupa by (1)
the small paddle with a broad colorless midrib, (2) the 17-19 moderately long,
secondarily branched primary branches of the float hair (1-I), and (3) the mul-
tiple hairs 1-3-C and 1-P; and in the larva by (1) the very strongly joined tuber-
cles of hairs 5-7-P, (2) the 3- or 4-branched 5,7-P, (3) hair 14-P which has more
than 20 branches, (4) the double 2,4a-X, and (5) the most proximal hair (4e-X)
of the ventral brush which is proximad of the boss.
The slide of larval and pupal skins bearing the same number (1762.1) as the
allotype female of leucophoebus is incorrectly associated with that specimen since
the pupal skin is male. This set of skins must belong to either the paratype male
or the holotype, both of which were collected at Feijo rather than Tarauaca.
BIONOMICS. Unknown.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). Haemagogus leucophoebus is known from the Bra-
zilian State of Acre. Material examined: 4 specimens; 1 male, 1 female, 1 larva,
1 pupa; possibly 1 larval rearing.
BRAZIL. Acre: Feijo, 4 Aug 1949, 1 M (1763-3), 1 M gen, 1 Ip (labeled 1762.1) [USNM].
Tarauaca, 26 July 1949, 1 F (1762.1) [USNM].
24. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus (Dyar & Shannon)
Figs. 54,59-61
1904. Haemagogus leucomelas Lutz, 1904a:13, 1904b:4. TYPE: Lectotype female, Franca,
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 23 Sept 1903 [BM; selection of Belkin, 1971:20]. Rejected as junior
secondary hononym of leucomelas (Meigen, 1804) in Aedes by Dyar and Shannon
(1924:484).
1924. Aedes leucocelaenus Dyar and Shannon, 1924:484. Nomen novum for leucomelas Lutz,
1904.
Aedes (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus of Dyar (1928:153-154, in part); Shannon and Del Ponte
(1928:70-71); Shannon (1931:147).
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus of Edwards (1932:148,154,178, in part); Knight and Marks (1952:
517,518,542,569, in part); Lane (1953:682-685, in part); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:
165); Forattini (1965:378-382, in part).
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus leucocelaenus of Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido (1953:531,538,
539,540).
Aedes leucocelaenus of Dyar and Shannon (1924:484, in part); Komp (1938:260,261,263-266,
in part); Shannon, Whitman and Franca (1938:110-111); Waddell (1949:569-570,572,573,
574); Kumm and Cerqueira (1951:195-200, in part); Causey, Casals, Shope and Udomsakdi
(1963:778).
Haemagogus (Stegoconops) leucomelas of Lima (1930:259-260); Pinto (1932:295).
Stegoconops leucomelas of Lutz (1905:101-102); Peryassu (1908: 169-172).
For additional references see Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:810); Dyar (1928:153); Kumm and
Cerqueira (1951:195-200); Cova Garcia, Sutil and Rausseo (1966b:331-332); and Travis and
Labadan (1967:11).
FEMALE (fig. 59). Wing: 2.77 mm. Proboscis: 2.37 mm. Forefemur: 2.07 mm.
Abdomen: about 2.7 mm. Moderate in size. Head: Erect scales entirely dark brown
(Trinidad), entirely light brown (Brazil), or entirely amber or light brown laterally
and white mesally (Argentina). Dorsolateral silver patch large to very large. Cor-
onal silver line usually well developed and complete. Thorax: Acrostichal silver
Zavortink: New World Aedes 125
scales in a long narrow to broad line that narrows posteriorly but usually reach-
es prescutellar space. Lateral prescutellar silver line usually well developed and
conspicuous, distinctly separated from its mate. Midlobe of scutellum with sil-
ver scales. Ppl with 1 or 2 long strong light or dark bristles and 1 or 2 weak
light bristles. Pst usually with only a few scales near ppl. Mep scale patch sim-
ple or with a short to moderately long caudal extension from upper end. Legs:
Femora without a white line extending basad from apex along ventral surface.
Knee spot absent on foreleg, moderate to large on midleg, large on hindleg, not
or only slightly extended basad on midleg and hindleg.
MALE (fig. 59). Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus
0.87-0.94 length of proboscis. Thorax: Acrostichal silver line usually strong to
prescutellar space. Legs: Larger claw of midleg with large blunt submedian tooth.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 60). Segment VIII: Tergite about 0.80-0.98 length
of sternite; with 2-4 rows of enlarged setae along distal margin. Segment LX: Lat-
eral portions of tergite joined by very narrow weakly sclerotized or membranous
strip; tergite without membranous lobes. Sidepiece: Basal tergomesal area with
numerous setae, the more ventral usually strongly curved dorsad at apex; sub-
apical tuft inconspicuous, weakly developed, represented by only 2-5 setae; spec-
ialized scales of sternomesal surface moderately numerous (8-15), predominantly
broadly lanceolate to elliptic, the longest ones shorter than clasper; general vesti-
ture of scales and setae moderately dense, basal portion of tergal surface with
a few moderately long setae directly over I[X-T. Claspette: Stem with 1-3 mod-
erately long fine distal setae. Filament simple, slightly flattened. Clasper: Usually
without any conspicuous swelling or with middle portion slightly swollen. Phal-
losome: Aedeagus moderate in size, more or less pandurate. Proctiger: Apical knob
of paraproct with about 13-17 fine or moderately coarse striations.
PUPA (fig. 60). Abdomen: about 3.1 mm. Trumpet: 0.45 mm. Paddle: 0.62
mm. Cephalothorax: Pigmentation lighter ventrally, leg cases not as strongly pig-
mented as middorsal area. Hairs 1-3-C single. Hair 5-C single, extending far be-
yond base of trumpet. Trumpet: Reticulate sculpturing usually moderately strong.
Abdomen: Weakly to moderately pigmented; posterior segments uniformly pig-
mented, lighter than anterior segments, or with small anterior middorsal area or
large middorsal area darkened, the darkened areas sometimes coalescing to form
a median longitudinal streak; middorsal portion of segment I not more strongly
pigmented than segment II. Float hair (1-I) with 9-12 (7-14) long, predominant-
ly simple primary branches; 1-II-VII moderately developed, usually single or dou-
ble and subequal on all segments or slightly longer and stronger on middle or
posterior segments, sometimes 3-6b, especially on anterior segments. Hair 5-I] weak-
ly to moderately developed, usually single or double (1-5b), located nearer lat-
eral edge than to hair 1 or about halfway between hair 1 and lateral edge; 5-III
strongly developed, single, arising near hair 1; hair 5-IV 1.6-2.0 length of seg-
ment IV, single, arising near hair 1; hair 5-V-VII single. Hair 6-VII not stronger
than 6-III-VI. Hair 9-VIII with 2-5 branches, some elongate. Paddle: Large, in-
ner part wider than outer part and usually extending farther distad, distal por-
tion slightly asymmetrical. Apex rounded to slightly emarginate. Midrib normal,
narrow, dark, extending to or nearly to apex. Hair 1-P single.
LARVA (fig. 61). Head: 0.77 mm. Siphon: 0.78 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.33 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually single (single or double). Hair 6-C double. Hair 7-C 3-
5b. Thorax: Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P usually free, sometimes weakly joined. Hair
4-P usually 5,6b (4-8). Hair 5-P usually single (single or double). Hair 7-P usu-
126 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
ally double (single or double). Hair 14-P 3-6b. Abdomen: Hair 1-III-V usually
4-6b (3-7). Hair 6-III-V double. Hair 7-II moderately long and moderately strong,
5-8b, its tubercle never joined with that of 6-II. Siphon: Index 2.5-3.7. Acus us-
ually distinct, small to large. Pecten teeth usually with 1 large basal denticle.
Hair 1-S moderately developed, moderately long to long, but not attaining apex
of siphon, 2,3b. Anal Segment: Hair 2-X 3,4b. Ventral brush with 5 pairs of
hairs; all hairs arising from boss; hair 4a-X 3-5b.
SYSTEMATICS. Haemagogus leucocelaenus is distinguished from the 3 other
described species in the subgenus Conopostegus as follows: in the female by the
combination of (1) the strongly developed lateral prescutellar scale line of the
mesoscutum, (2) the reduced number of propleural bristles, (3) the shape of the
mesepimeral scale patch, which is simple or has a short caudal extension from
the upper end, (4) the absence of a knee spot on the forefemur, and (5) the
knee spot of the hindfemur, which is not extended basad; in the male by the
combination of (1) the weakly developed subapical tuft of setae on the sidepiece,
(2) the 1-3 moderately long fine distal setae on the claspette stem, (3) the sim-
ple claspette filament, (4) the 2-4 rows of enlarged setae along the distal mar-
gin of tergite VIII, (5) the shape of the clasper which is not swollen or only
slightly swollen in the middle, (6) the 13-17 fine to moderately coarse striations
at the apex of the paraproct, and (7) the presence of a submedian tooth on the
large claw of the midleg; in the pupa by (1) the 9-12 (7-14) long simple branches
of the float hair (1-1), (2) the large paddle which is slightly asymmetrical dis-
tally, and the combination of (3) a strongly developed hair 5-III, (4) a weakly
to moderately developed 5-II that is not located close to 1-II, and (5) the rela-
tively lightly pigmented leg cases and middle portion of tergite I; and in the larva
by the combination of (1) the free or weakly joined tubercles of hairs 5-7-P, (2)
the usually single (single or double) 5-P and the usually double (single or dou-
ble) 7-P, (3) the few (3-6) branched 14-P, (4) the 5 pairs of hairs in the ventral
brush, (5) the double 6-III-V, (6) the 5-8 branched 7-II which never arises from
the same alveolar plate as 6-II, and (7) the presence of a distinct acus at the base
of the siphon.
The population of leucocelaenus in northwestern Argentina differs from the
other populations of this species in several features: in the female the erect scales
of the head are lighter and the patch of scales on the mesepimeron has a longer
caudal extension from the upper end; in the male the subapical tuft of setae on
the sidepiece is more strongly developed and the specialized scales on the sterno-
mesal surface of the sidepiece are broader and fewer in number; and in the larva
the siphon and anal gills are longer. The population from Trinidad differs in the
female by the very dark erect scales of the head and the basally extended knee
spot of the hindleg. Too few specimens are available to determine the significance
of the variations in these populations.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of leucocelaenus have been collected in treeholes,
broken or cut bamboo internodes and artificial containers. There are several rec-
ords of females biting humans during the day.
This species has been found infected with the virus of yellow fever at Affonso
Arinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Shannon, Whitman and Franca, 1938:110-111)
and with the virus Una at Belem, Para, Brazil (Causey et al., 1963:778). In the
laboratory it has been found to be a more efficient vector of yellow fever than
Aedes aegypti (Waddell, 1949:569-570,572,573-574).
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). Haemagogus leucocelaenus extends from Trinidad to
Zavortink: New World Aedes 127
southern Brazil and northern Argentina. Material examined: 239 specimens; 47
males, 62 females, 64 larvae, 66 pupae; 64 individual rearings (60 larval, 2 pupal, 2
incomplete).
ARGENTINA. Misiones: Iguazu, 5 Oct 1927, R.C. and E.M. Shannon, 1 F [USNM]. Salta:
General Enrique Mosconi (Vespucio), 18 Feb 1967, H. Fernandez, M. Garcia and O. Casal (ARG
601), 1 IlpF (601-12), 1 pM (601-100), 1 M gen; General Enrique Mosconi (Vespucio) (about 7
km from Tablillas), 15 Feb 1967, H. Fernandez, M. Garcia and O. Casal (ARG 619), 1 IpM
(619-10) [UCLA]. Tucuman: Raco, 13 Feb 1927, R.C. Shannon, 1 M, 3 F, 1 M gen [USNM].
Trancas, Nov 1960, 2 M, 2 F, 2 M gen [USNM]. Vipos, 4 Feb 1927, R.C. Shannon and E.
Del Ponte, 1 M, 1 F, 1 M gen, 1 P [USNM].
BRAZIL. Goias: Anapolis, Mar 1936, 2 M, 1 M gen [USNM]. Guanabara: Paineiras, Nov
1939, 1 M, 1 M gen [GML]. Rio de Janeiro, Aug 1938, R.C. Shannon, 1 M, 1 M gen; 1 Feb
1907, 1 F; 1 L [USNM]. Sao Conrado, 2-13 Dec 1946 (Lots 15,24,26,27,31), 4 IpM (24-1,
26-1, 27-4, 31-1), 7 IpF (15-5, 26-2,3, 27-2,3, 31-3,4), 1 M (27-1), 1 F (15-4), 2 M gen [UCLA].
Mato Grosso: Cuiaba, Feb 1935, 2 F [CU]. Maracaju, 1 F [USNM]. Rio de Janeiro: Duque de
Caxias, 2-12 Dec 1946, 2 lpM (2 Dec, 12 Dec), 2 M gen; 29-30 May 1951, 1 IpF (30 May),
1 M (29 May), 1 M gen [GML]; 2 Dec 1946-18 Jan 1947 (Lots 1,3,6,8-10,14,17,42,50,57,59,
69,72,823,836,840), 24 IpM (1-1, 3-2, 6-1, 8-1, 9-3, 10-1, 14-1, 17-1, 42-1, 50-1, 57-1, 69-1-4,
72-1,2, 823-1-4, 836-1,2, 840-1), 14 IpF (3-7, 6-3, 8-5, 10-2, 14-3,4, 17-4, 42-3,4, 50-3, 59-3,
72-3,4, 836-8), 1 IM (57-6), 5 F (1-5, 9-5, 17-3, 69-5, 836-7), 4 M gen [UCLA except 14-3 and
42-3 at USNM]. Sto. Eduardo, Jan 1939, 6 F [USNM]. Sao Paulo: Avare, J. Lane, 2 F [CU].
Buri, 1 F [UCLA]. Itapira, 3 F [CU]. Rocinha, 20 Feb 1937, A. Ramos, 1 F [UCLA]. State
and Locality Unknown: 1 \pM (P-246) and associated gen (P-122), 1 IpF (1.287 n.2), 1 Ip
(G-204) [USNM].
TRINIDAD. Caroni: Flanagin Town, Apr 1964, R. Manuel and R. Martinez (TR 513), 1 F
[UCLA]. Todds Road, 19 June 1941, L.E. Rozeboom (TRR 10), 1 F [UCLA]. Nariva: Taba-
quite, Charuma Forest, Oct 1964, A. Guerra (TR 753), 1 lpM (753-107), 1 M gen [UCLA].
St. George: Arima, Brasso Seco, Apr 1964, A. Guerra (TR 270), 1 F [UCLA]. Arima, St. Pats
Estate, Mar 1955, T.H.G. Aitken, 1 M, 1 F, 1 M gen [UCLA]. Arima, Verdant Vale, 10 Sept
1964, A. Guerra (TR 672), 1 L; Sept 1964, A. Guerra (TR 674), 2 IpM (674-101,102), 1 IpF
(674-103), 1 M gen; 9 Apr 1965, A. Guerra (TR 1097), 1 F [UCLA]. Chaguaramas, 11 June
1961, T.H.G. Aitken, 1 pF (11-VI-61-1), 1 p [UCLA]. Port of Spain, St. Ann’s, 9 Sept 1945,
W.H.W. Komp, 1 P (5-T-68) [USNM]. County not Specified: 6 June 1906, F.W. Urich, 1 F
[USNM].
Additional Records From the Literature
BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul: Taquara (Pinto, 1932:295).
PARAGUAY. Itapua: Villa Encarnacion (Shannon and Del Ponte, 1928:71).
25. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) clarki (Galindo, Carpenter & Trapido)
Figs. 54,62,63
1953. Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus clarki Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido, 1953:531-534.
TYPE: Holotype male with associated larval and pupal skins and genitalia, Tucue,
Cocle, Panama, reared from egg laid by female taken biting human on 5 Sept 1950
[USNM].
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus clarki of Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido (1955:160,161,163);
Galindo and Trapido (1955:546,548); Trapido and Galindo (1955:671); Trapido, Galindo
and Carpenter (1955:529); Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959:165, in part).
Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus of Edwards (1932:148,154,178, in part); Galindo, Trapido and
Carpenter (1950:547,563,566,571-572); Knight and Marks (1952:517,518,542,569, in part);
128 ~ Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Lane (1953:682-685, in part); Forattini (1965:378-382, in part).
Aedes (Conopostegus) leucocelaenus in part of Dyar (1925:137,141,143; 1928:153-154).
Aedes (Finlaya) n.sp. of Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido (1951:119-120,121).
Aedes leucocelaenus in part of Dyar and Shannon (1924:484); Komp (1938:260,261,263-266).
Aedes leucomelas in part of Howard, Dyar and Knab (1917:810-812).
Aedes (?Gualteria) leucomelas in part of Dyar (1918:73).
Aedes leucotaeniatus in part of Komp (1938:261-263).
FEMALE. Wing: 2.26 mm. Proboscis: 2.09 mm. Forefemur: 1.81 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.0 mm. Small species. Head: Erect scales usually entirely dark brown
or blackish. Dorsolateral silver patch usually very large. Coronal silver line usu-
ally moderately well developed, moderately long. Thorax: Acrostichal silver scales
in a broad patch restricted to anterior 0.25-0.35 of mesoscutum. Lateral prescu-
tellar silver line usually absent, sometimes poorly developed and incomplete, dis-
tinctly separated from its mate when present. Midlobe of scutellum usually with-
out silver scales. Ppl with only 1 (1 or 2) long strong dark bristle and 1 (0-2)
weak light bristle. Pst with only a few scales near ppl. Mep scale patch simple,
without a caudal extension from dorsal end. Legs: Femora without a narrow white
line on ventral surface extending basad from apex. Knee spot absent on foreleg,
large but not extended basad on midleg, large and extended basad along ventral
surface on hindleg.
MALE. Similar to female except for sexual characters. Head: Palpus about 0.67-
0.82 length of proboscis. Thorax: Silver scaling more extensive than in female;
acrostichal patch longer, sometimes extemding through anterior 0.50 of mesoscu-
tum; lateral prescutellar line well developed; midlobe of scutellum with silver scales.
Legs: Larger claw of midleg without submedian tooth.
MALE GENITALIA (fig. 62). Segment VIII: Tergite about 0.90 length of ster-
nite; usually with only 1 irregular row of enlarged setae along distal margin. Seg-
ment IX: Lateral portions of tergite not joined or joined by very narrow mem-
branous or weakly sclerotized strip; tergite without membranous lobes. Sidepiece:
Basal tergomesal area with numerous setae, the more ventral straight or gently
or strongly curved dorsad; subapical tuft inconspicuous, weakly developed, repre-
sented by only 3-5 setae; specialized scales of sternomesal surface moderately num-
erous (11-15), predominantly elliptic, the longest ones much shorter than clasper;
general vestiture of scales and setae moderately dense, basal portion of tergal sur-
face without setae directed over IX-T. Claspette: Stem with 1-3 moderately long
fine distal setae. Filament simple, slightly flattened. Clasper: Usually distinctly
swollen near base. Phallosome: Aedeagus moderate in size, more or less pandu-
rate. Proctiger: Apical knob of paraproct with 10-14 moderately coarse to coarse
striations.
PUPA (fig. 62). Abdomen: about 3.2 mm. Trumpet: 0.56 mm. Paddle: 0.95
mm. Cephalothorax: Pigmentation not uniformly lighter ventrally, leg cases as dark
as or darker than middorsal area. Hairs 1-3-C single. Hair 5-C single, extending
far beyond base of trumpet. Trumpet: Reticulate sculpturing usually weak. Ab-
domen: Weakly pigmented with middorsal area of most segments usually darker,
the darker areas usually forming a median longitudinal streak; middorsal portion
of segment I more strongly pigmented than segment II. Float hair (1-I) with 3-6
very long, simple primary branches; hair 1 moderately to strongly developed on
II and III, strongly developed on IV-VII, usually single or double (1-3b). Hair
5-II moderately to strongly developed, single, arising nearer hair 1 than to lat-
eral edge of segment; 5-III strongly developed, single, arising near hair 1; hair
Zavortink: New World Aedes 129
5-IV 2.3-3.0 length of segment IV, single, arising near hair 1; hair 5-V-VII sin-
gle. Hair 6-VII not stronger than 6-III-VI. Hair 9-VIII with 3 or 4 branches, some
elongate. Paddle: Large, inner part much broader than outer part and extending
farther distad, distal portion strongly asymmetrical. Apex emarginate. Midrib nor-
mal, narrow, dark, extending to or nearly to apex. Hair 1-P single.
LARVA (fig. 63). Head: 0.78 mm. Siphon: 0.88 mm. Anal Saddle: 0.31 mm.
Head: Hair 5-C usually double (single or double). Hair 6-C double. Hair 7-C 2,3b
(2-4). Thorax: Tubercles of hairs 5-7-P usually free, sometimes weakly joined.
Hair 4-P usually 3,4b (2-5). Hair 5-P usually single (single or double). Hair 7-P
usually double (single or double). Hair 14-P 3-5b. Abdomen: Hair 1-III-V usu-
ally 2-4b (2-5). Hair 6-III-V usually single (single or double). Hair 7-II long and
strong, usually 1-3b (1-5), its tubercle often joined to that of 6-II by sclerotiza-
tion. Siphon: Index 3.2-3.9. Acus usually indistinct, fused with base of siphon.
Pecten teeth usually with 1 large basal denticle. Hair 1-S moderately developed,
moderately long to long, not attaining apex of siphon, 3,4b. Anal Segment: Hair
2-X 3,4b. Ventral brush with 5 pairs of hairs; all hairs arising from boss; hair
4a-X 3-5b.
SYSTEMATICS. Haemagogus clarki may be distinguished from /eucotaeniatus,
leucophoebus and leucocelaenus as follows: in the female by (1) the broad sil-
ver acrostichal patch that is restricted to the anterior 0.25-0.45 of the mesoscu-
tum, (2) the absent or weakly developed lateral prescutellar silver line, (3) the
reduced number of propleural bristles, (4) the simple mesepimeral scale patch,
and (5) the knee spot of the hindfemur which is conspicuously extended basad
along the ventral surface; in the male by (1) the shorter palpus, (2) the absence
of a submedian tooth on the larger claw of the midleg, (3) the single row of en-
larged setae along the distal margin of tergite VIII, and (4) the 10-14 moderately
coarse to coarse striations at the apex of the paraproct; in the pupa by (1) the
3-6 very long simple branches of the float hair (1-I), (2) the large paddle which
is strongly asymmetrical distally, (3) the moderately to strongly developed hair
5-II which may be displaced mesad and arise near 1-II, and (4) the relatively
darkly pigmented leg cases and middle portion of tergite I; and in the larva by
(1) the usually single hair 6-III-V, (2) the long, strong, usually 1-3b (1-5) hair
7-II that frequently arises from the same sclerotization as 6-II, and (3) the ab-
sence of a distinct acus at the base of the siphon.
The single female from Guyana has a much smaller dorsolateral silver patch
on the head than typical females from Panama. Since this patch is small in both
the forms (species 26 and 27) segregated from clarki, it is possible that this spec-
imen represents another undescribed species.
BIONOMICS. The immatures of clarki have been found in treeholes and bam-
boo traps. There are many records of females biting humans during daylight hours.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). Haemagogus clarki extends from Honduras to Pana-
ma and possibly to Guyana. Material examined: 187 specimens; 32 males, 75 fe-
males, 40 larvae, 40 pupae; 35 individual rearings (17 larval, 8 pupal, 10 incomplete).
GUYANA. Essequibo: Mazaruni, 25 June 1936, W.H.W. Komp, 1 F (203A-23) [UCLA].
PANAMA. Bocas del Toro: Chiriqui Grande, Chiriquicito, 22 Apr 1963 (PA 250), 2 F [UCLA].
Canal Zone: Barro Colorado Island, 8-9 July 1923, R.C. Shannon, 6 F [USNM]; 1-31 May
1943 and 15 May-26 June 1945, W.H.W. Komp, 5 IpM (203A-12=43-184, 203A-13=43-123,
203A-15=43-154, 203A-30=45-230, 203A-32=45-223), 2 IpF (203A-15=43-154, 203A-34=45-
459), 3 pM (203A-4), 2 IM (203A-11=43-234, 203A-16=43-232), 1 IF (203A-8=43-224), 3 M
(203A-3, 203A-6=43-168, 203A-28), 1 F (203A-26), 2 Ip (43-133), 21 (45-140, 45-247), 1 p
(203A-1=43-196), 1 M, 2 L, 1 P, 1 M gen [USNM], 4 IpM (203A-2=43-175, 203A-22=43-144,
130 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
203 A-27=43-228), 2 IpF (203A-31=45-248, 203A-33=45-225), 1 pM (203A-18=43-119), 1 pF
(203A-18=43-119), 2 IM (203A-17=43-163, 203A-25=43-199), 1 M, 2 F (203A-9), 2 L (43-102,
43-220) [UCLA]. Barro Colorado Island (?), 2 F [UCLA]. Corozal, 8 Jan 1943, W.H.W. Komp,
4 F [USNM]. Corozal Dam Site, 28 July 1943, W.H.W. Komp, 1 F (203A-21) [UCLA]. Fort
Clayton, 8-15 Nov 1951, S.J. Carpenter, 3 F [UCLA]. Fort Davis, 15-29 Nov 1951, S.J. Carpenter,
1 F [UCLA]. Fort Gulick, 27 Dec 1951, S.J. Carpenter, 1 F [UCLA]. Fort Sherman, 9 Dec
1949, 1 F [UCLA]. Cocle: Tucue, 5 Sept 1950, 1 IpF (467-1) [USNM], 1 F, 1 lp, 1 L [GML].
Darien: La Palma, 29 Nov 1966, O.G.W. Berlin (PA 958), 1 pF (958-101), 1 L [UCLA]. Paya,
1 Mar 1958, 1 lpM (GG1-117), 1 lpF (GG1-124), 1 pF (GG1-120) [UCLA]. Pucro, Tacarcuna
River Valley, 20 June 1963 (PA 406), 1 F; 8 July 1963 (PA 444), 1 F; 12 July 1963 (PA
457), 1 F [UCLA]. Panama: Arriajan, 10 July 1950, S.J. Carpenter, 3 M, 3 M gen, 1 F [UCLA].
Cerro La Victoria, 1949, H. Trapido, 9 F [UCLA]; 23 Aug 1949-5 Sept 1950, 1 lpM (00081),
1 M, 2 M gen, 5 F, 2 1lp,4 P, 4 L [USNM], 3 M, 2 F,4 P, 1 L [GML]. Pacora, 16 Oct 1946, W.H.W.
Komp, 1 F [USNM]; 13 July 1950, S.J. Carpenter (5019), 1 pF (5019-3) [UCLA]; 7 Feb-
12 Dec 1950, 1 M, 1 M gen, 17 F [UCLA].
Additional Records From the Literature
COSTA RICA. (Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido, 1953:531; Galindo and Trapido, 1955:
546,548; Trapido, Galindo and Carpenter, 1955:529.)
HONDURAS. Yaruca (Trapido and Galindo, 1955:671).
26. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) sp., Small Colombian form
Fig. 54
?Aedes (Finlaya) leucocelaenus in part of Forattini (1965:378-382).
?Aedes leucocelaenus in part of Komp (1936:62; 1938:260,261,263-266; 1956:37-38); Bugher,
Boshell-Manrique, Roca-Garcia and Osorno-Mesa (1944:45,47,48).
?Aedes (Finlaya) n.sp. of Galindo, Carpenter and Trapido (1953:531).
FEMALE. Wing: 2.79 mm. Proboscis: 2.46 mm. Forefemur: 2.31 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.6 mm. Moderate in size. Head: Erect scales usually entirely dark
brown or blackish. Dorsolateral silver patch reduced, small to moderate in size.
Coronal silver line reduced in extent, present only anteriorly. Thorax: Acrostichal
silver scales in a broad long patch in anterior 0.40-0.45 of mesoscutum. Lateral
prescutellar silver line well developed, conspicuous, distinctly separated from its
mate. Midlobe of scutellum with silver scales. Ppl with 1 long strong dark bris-
tle and O or | weak light bristle. Pst with a few scales near ppl. Mep scale patch
simple, without a caudal extension at dorsal end. Legs: All femora with a rela-
tively long white line extending basad from apex along ventral surface. Knee spot
absent from foreleg, moderate on midleg, large on hindleg, that of midleg and
hindleg continuous with white line extending basad from apex of femora.
MALE. Unknown.
MALE GENITALIA (not figured). Possibly indistinguishable from clarki.
PUPA, LARVA. Unknown. |
SYSTEMATICS. The small Colombian form is similar to clarki and to the Peru-
vian lowland form. It differs from the former species in the female by (1) the
reduced silver scaling on the head, (2) the strongly developed lateral prescutellar
silver line on the mesoscutum, and (3) the presence of a relatively long white
line on the ventral surface of the apical portion of the forefemur and midfemur;
and from the latter species by character (2) mentioned above and by the longer
white line on the ventral surface of the apical portion of the forefemur and mid-
femur.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 131
There is a male genitalia slide labeled Tena, Ecuador, in the USNM that may
be this species. The genitalia appear to be indistinguishable from clarki.
BIONOMICS. The habitat of the immatures is unknown. The females were pre-
sumably obtained in biting-landing collections. This species is sympatric with the
large Colombian form “in the mountains by the coast.”
The yellow fever isolation reported by Bugher et al. (1944:45,47,48) may have
been from this species.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). The small Colombian form is known from 2 unspec-
ified localities in Colombia and possibly also from Ecuador. Material examined:
3 specimens; 2 females, 1 male genitalia.
COLOMBIA. Locality Unknown: “In the mountains by the coast,” 22 Dec 1936, J.A. Kerr,
1 F; M. Bates, 1 F [UCLA].
ECUADOR. Napo Pastaza: Tena, 1 M gen [USNM].
27. Haemagogus (Conopostegus) sp., Peruvian lowland form
Fig. 54
FEMALE. Wing: 2.23 mm. Proboscis: 1.90 mm. Forefemur: 1.74 mm. Abdo-
men: about 2.0 mm. Small species. Head: Erect scales entirely dark brown. Dorso-
lateral silver patch reduced, small. Coronal silver line absent. Thorax: Acrostichal
scales in a broad patch of undetermined length. Lateral prescutellar silver line ab-
sent. Midlobe of scutellum without silver scales. Pp! with at least 1 long strong
amber bristle. Scalation of pst unknown. Mep scale patch simple, without a caudal
extension at dorsal end. Legs: All femora with a short white line extending basad
from apex along ventral surface. Knee spot absent on foreleg, moderate on mid-
leg, large on hindleg, that of midleg and hindleg continuous with white line ex-
tending basad from apex of femora.
MALE, PUPA, LARVA. Unknown.
SYSTEMATICS. The Peruvian lowland form is similar to clarki and the small
Colombian form. It differs from clarki in the female by (1) the reduced silver
scaling on the head, and (2) the presence of a relatively short white line on the
ventral surface of the apex of the forefemur and midfemur; and it differs from
the small Colombian form in the female by (1) the absence of a lateral prescutel-
lar silver scale line, and (2) the shorter white line on the ventral surface of the
apex of the forefemur and midfemur.
BIONOMICS. Unknown.
DISTRIBUTION (fig. 54). The Peruvian lowland form is known from the Amazon
Basin in eastern Peru. Material examined: 1 female.
PERU. Loreto: Iquitos, Mar-Apr 1931, R.C. Shannon, 1 F [USNM].
132 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
REFERENCES CITED
Aitken, Thomas H.G.
1941. A new American subgenus and species of Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Pan-
Pac. Entomol. 17:81-84.
1942. Contributions toward a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California.
No. 6. Diptera: Culicidae. Calif. Acad. Sci., Proc. (4) 24:161-170.
Arnell, J. Hal and L.T. Nielsen
1972. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXVII. The varipalpus group of
Aedes (Ochlerotatus). Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 8(2). 48 p.
Belkin, John N.
1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Vol. 1. Berkeley,
Univ. Calif. Press. 608 p.
1968. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). IX. The type specimens of New
World mosquitoes in European museums. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 3(4).
69 p.
Belkin, John N., S.J. Heinemann and W.A. Page
1970. The Culicidae of Jamaica (Mosquito Studies. XXI). Am. Entomol. Inst.,
Contrib. 6(1). 458 p. (Also published as Inst. Jam., Bull. Sci. Ser. 20)
Belkin, John N. and W.A. McDonald
1957. A new species of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) from tree holes in southern Arizona
and a discussion of the varipalpus complex (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol.
Soc. Am., Ann. 50:179-191.
Belkin, John N., R.X. Schick and S.J. Heinemann
1971. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXV. Mosquitoes originally des-
cribed from Brazil. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 7(5). 64 p.
Bennett, Bryon, L., F.C. Baker and A.W. Sellards
1939. The susceptibility of the mosquito Aedes triseriatus to the virus of yellow
fever under experimental conditions. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 33:101-105.
Berlin, O. George W.
1969. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XII. A revision of the Neotropical
subgenus Howardina of Aedes. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 4(2). 190 p.
Bonne, Cornelis and J. Bonne-Wepster
1925. Mosquitoes of Surinam. R. Colon. Inst. Amst., Afd. Trop. Hyg. 13. 558 p.
Bonne-Wepster, Jean and C. Bonne
1921. Notes on South American mosquitoes in the British Museum (Diptera,
Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 9:1-26.
Breland, Osmond P.
1949. Distinctive features of the larvae of Aedes alleni Turner (Diptera: Culic-
idae). N.Y. Entomol. Soc., J. 57:93-100.
1958. Notes on the Aedes muelleri complex (Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol. Soc.
Wash., Proc. 60:206.
1960. Restoration of the name, Aedes hendersoni Cockerell, and its elevation
to full specific rank (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 53:600-
606.
Brunetti, E.
1914. Critical review of “‘genera” in Culicidae. Indian Mus. Calcutta, Rec. 10:
15-73.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 133
Bugher, John C., J. Boshell-Manrique, M. Roca-Garcia and E. Osorno-Mesa
1944. Epidemiology of jungle yellow fever in eastern Colombia. Am. J. Hyg.
39:16-51.
Burger, John F.
1965. Aedes kompi Vargas and Downs 1950, new to the United States. Mosq.
News 25:396-398.
Carpenter, Stanley J.
1941. The mosquitoes of Arkansas. Little Rock, Arkansas State Board Health.
87 p.
1949. Notes on mosquito collections in Pennsylvania and Canada during 1948.
Mosq. News 9:172-173. |
1950. Notes on mosquitoes in North America: I—New distribution records for
eastern United States during 1946 and 1947. Mosq. News 10:64-65.
1968. Review of recent literature on mosquitoes of North America. Calif. Vector
Views 15:71-98.
1970. Review of recent literature on mosquitoes of North America. Supplement
I. Calif. Vector Views 17:39-65. June.
Carpenter, Stanley J. and W.J. LaCasse
1955. Mosquitoes of North America (north of Mexico). Berkeley, Univ. Calif.
Press. 360 p.
Carpenter, Stanley J., W.W. Middlekauff and R.W. Chamberlain
1946. The mosquitoes of the southern United States east of Oklahoma and
Texas. Am. Midl. Nat., Monogr. 3. 292 p.
Causey, Ottis R., J. Casals, R.E. Shope and S. Udomsakdi
1963. Aura and una, two new group A arthropod-borne viruses. Am. J. Trop.
Med. Hyg. 12:777-781.
Chamberlain, Roy W., R.K. Sikes, D.B. Nelson and W.D. Sudia
1954. Studies on the North American arthropod-borne encephalitides. VI. Quan-
titative determinations of virus-vector relationships. Am. J. Hyg. 60:278-285.
Cockerell, Theodore D.A.
1918. The mosquitoes of Colorado. J. Econ. Entomol. 11:195-200.
Coquillett, Daniel W.
1902. Three new species of Culex. Can. Entomol. 34:292-293.
1906a. Five new Culicidae from the West Indies. Can. Entomol. 38:60-62.
1906b. New Culicidae from the West Indies and Central America. Entomol.
Soc. Wash., Proc. 7:182-186.
1906c. A classification of the mosquitoes of North and Middle America. U.S.
Bur. Entomol., Tech. Ser. 11. 31 p.
1910. The type-species of the North American genera of Diptera. U.S. Natl. Mus.,
Proc. 37:499-647.
Cova Garcia, Pablo, E. Sutil and J.A. Rausseo
1966a. Mosquitos (Culicinos) de Venezuela. Vol. 1. Caracas, Minist. Sanid. Asist.
Soc. 410 p.
1966b. Mosquitos (Culicinos) de Venezuela. Vol. 2. Caracas, Minist. Sanid. Asist.
Soc. 406 p.
Darsie, Richard F., Jr.
1951. Pupae of the culicine mosquitoes of the northeastern United States (Dip-
tera, Culicidae, Culicini). Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Mem. 304. 67 p.
Davis, M.H., A.L. Hogge, Jr., E.C. Corristan and J.F. Ferrell
1966. Mosquito transmission of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus from
134 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
experimentally infected dogs. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 15:227-230.
Davis, Nelson C. and R.C. Shannon
1931. Studies on yellow fever in South America. Attempts to transmit the virus
with certain aedine and sabethine mosquitoes and with triatomas (Hemiptera).
Am. J. Trop. Med. 11:21-29.
Davis, William A.
1940. A study of birds and mosquitoes as hosts for the virus of eastern equine
encephalomyelitis. Am. J. Hyg. 32(C):45-59.
Dyar, Harrison G.
1906. Illustrations of mosquito larvae. Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 8:15-21.
1918. The male genitalia of Aedes as indicative of natural affinities (Diptera,
Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 6:71-86.
1919. Westward extension of the Canadian mosquito fauna (Diptera, Culicidae).
Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 7:11-39.
1920. A new mosquito from Mexico (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae
Mens. 8:81-82.
1921a. Comment on the preceding paper (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae
Mens. 9:26-31.
1921b. Three new mosquitoes from Costa Rica (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor
Inscitiae Mens. 9:34-36.
1922a. Mosquito notes (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 10:92-99,
1922b. The mosquitoes of the United States. U.S. Natl. Mus., Proc. 62:1-119.
1922c. Notes on tropical American mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor
Inscitiae Mens. 10:188-196.
1922d. The American Aedes of the serratus group (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor
Inscitiae Mens. 10:157-166.
1924. The larva of Aedes alleni Turner (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae
Mens. 12:131-132.
1925. The mosquitoes of Panama (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens.
13:101-195.
1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Wash., Carnegie Inst. Wash. (Publ. 387).
616 p.
Dyar, Harrison G. and F. Knab
1906. The larvae of Culicidae classified as independent organisms. N.Y. Entomol.
Soc., J. 14:169-230.
1907. Descriptions of new mosquitoes from the Panama Canal Zone. N.Y. Ento-
mol. Soc., J. 15:197-212.
1908. Descriptions of some new mosquitoes from tropical America. U.S. Natl.
Mus., Proc. 35:53-70.
1918. New American mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens.
5:165-169.
Dyar, Harrison G. and R.C. Shannon
1924. The subfamilies, tribes and genera of American Culicidae. Wash. Acad.
Sci., J. 14:472-486.
Edwards, Frederick W.
1932. Diptera. Fam. Culicidae. Genera Insectorum 194. 258 p.
Forattini, Oswaldo P.
1965. Entomologia medica. Vol. 2. Sao Paulo, Univ. Sao Paulo. 506 p.
Forattini, Oswaldo P. and E.X. Rabello
1960. Notas sobre Culicidae (Diptera). 2—A larva, a pupa e alguns dados bio-
Zavortink: New World Aedes 135
logicos de Aedes (Finlaya) fluviatilis Lutz, 1904. Univ. Sao Paulo, Fac. Hig.
Saude Publica, Arq. 14:87-94.
Galindo, Pedro, S.J. Carpenter and H. Trapido
1951. Ecological observations on forest mosquitoes of an endemic yellow fever
area in Panama. Am. J. Trop. Med. 31:98-137. |
1953. The taxonomic status of the Aedes leucocelaenus complex with descrip-
tions of two new forms (Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 45:
529-542.
1955. A contribution to the ecology and biology of tree-hole breeding mosquitoes
of Panama. Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 48:158-164.
Galindo, Pedro and H. Trapido
1955. Forest canopy mosquitoes associated with the appearance of sylvan yellow
fever in Costa Rica, 1951. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4:543-549.
Galindo, Pedro, H. Trapido and S.J. Carpenter
1950. Observations on diurnal forest mosquitoes in relation to sylvan yellow fever
in Panama. Am. J. Trop. Med. 30:533-574.
Gibson, Arthur
19377. Mosquito suppression work in Canada in 1936. N.J. Mosq. Exterm. Assoc.,
Proc. 24:96-108.
Gjullin, C.M. |
1946. A key to the Aedes females of America north of Mexico (Diptera, Culici-
dae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 48:215-236.
Grabham, Michael
1907. Notes on some new mosquitoes from Jamaica, West Indies. Can. Entomol.
39:25-26. |
Harmston, Fred C.
1969. Separation of the females of Aedes hendersoni Cockerell and Aedes tri-
seriatus (Say) Diptera: Culicidae by the tarsal claws. Mosq. News 29:490-491.
Harmston, Fred C. and F.A. Lawson
1967. Mosquitoes of Colorado. U.S. Natl. Commun. Dis. Cent. 140 p.
Headlee, Thomas J.
1945. The mosquitoes of New Jersey and their control. New Brunswick, Rutgers
Univ. Press. 326 p.
Hedeen, Robert A.
1953. The biology of the mosquito Aedes atropalpus Coquillett. Kans. Entomol.
Soc., J. 26: 1-10.
1963. The occurrence of Aedes hendersoni Cockerell in northern Illinois. Mosq.
News 23:349-350.
Howard, Leland O., H.G. Dyar and F. Knab
1917. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 4.
Systematic description (in two parts). Part II. Wash., Carnegie Inst. Wash.
(Publ. 159). p. 525-1064.
Jakmauh, Paul J.
1940. The relation of mosquitoes to equine encephalomyelitis in Massachusetts.
N.J. Mosq. Exterm. Assoc., Proc. 27:12-18.
James, H.G.
1964. Insect and other fauna associated with the rock pool mosquito Aedes
atropalpus (Coq.). Mosq. News 24:325-329.
Jenkins, Dale W. and S.J. Carpenter
1946. Ecology of the tree hole breeding mosquitoes of Nearctic North America.
Ecol. Monogr. 16:33-47.
136 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
Kissling, Robert E. and R.W. Chamberlain
1967. Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Adv. Vet. Sci. 11:65-84.
Knight, Kenneth L. and E.N. Marks
1952. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of the subgenus Finlaya, genus
Aedes. U.S. Natl. Mus., Proc. 101:513-574.
Knutson, Herbert
1943. The status of the mosquitoes of the Great Swamp in Rhode Island during
1942. J. Econ. Entomol. 36:311-319.
Komp, William H.W.
1936. An annotated list of the mosquitoes found in the vicinity of an endemic
focus of yellow fever in the Republic of Colombia. Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc.
38:57-70.
1938. Aedes leucotaeniatus, a new species of Aedes allied to A. leucocelaenus
D. & S.; and descriptions of the male and larva of A. leucocelaenus D. & S.
(Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 40:260-266.
1956. Notes on mosquitoes from an area of endemic yellow fever in Colombia
(Diptera, Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 58:37-42.
Kumm, Henry W. and N.L. Cerqueira
1951. The role of Aedes leucocelaenus in the epidemiology of jungle yellow
fever in Brazil. Bull. Entomol. Res. 42:195-200.
Kumm, Henry W., W.H.W. Komp and H. Ruiz
1940. The mosquitoes of Costa Rica. Am. J. Trop. Med. 20:385-422.
Lane, John
1953. Neotropical Culicidae. Vol. 2. Sao Paulo, Univ. Sao Paulo. p. 553-1112.
Lima, Angelo da Costa
1930. Sobre os mosquitos que se criam em buracos de arvores. Inst. Oswaldo
Cruz, Mem. 23:255-260.
Loor, Kleber A. and G.R. DeFoliart
1970. Field observations on the biology of Aedes triseriatus. Mosq. News 30:
60-64.
Ludlow, Clara S.
1905. Mosquito notes—No. 4. Can. Entomol. 37:385-388.
Lutz, Adolpho
1904a. Catalogo dos culicideos Brasileiros e Sul-Americanos. /n Bourroul, Celes-
tino. Mosquitos do Brasil. Bahia. 16 p.
1904b. Chave para a determinacao das especies de Euculicidae encontradas no
Brasil. Jn Bourroul, Celestino. Mosquitos do Brasil. Bahia. 6 p.
1904c. Chave para a determinacao das especies da subfamilia Culicinae. Jn
Bourroul, Celestino. Mosquitos do Brasil. Bahia. 5 p.
1905. Novas especies de mosquitos do Brasil. Imprensa Med. 13(6):101-104.
25 Mar.
Lynch Arribalzaga, Felix
1891a. Dipterologia Argentina. Mus. La Plata, Rev. 1:345-377.
1891b. Dipterologia Argentina. Mus. La Plata, Rev. 2:131-174.
Masterson, R.A., H.W. Stegmiller, M.A. Parsons, C.C. Croft and C.B. Spencer
1971. California encephalitis—an endemic puzzle in Ohio. Health Lab. Sci. 8:
89-96.
Matheson, Robert
1944. Handbook of the mosquitoes of North America. Ed. 2. Ithaca, Comstock
Publ. Co. 314 p.
Zavortink: New World Aedes 137
Mattingly, Peter F.
1958. The culicine mosquitoes of the Indomalayan area. Part III. Genus Aedes
Meigen, subgenera Paraedes Edwards, Rhinoskusea Edwards and Cancraedes
Edwards. London, Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). 61 p.
1961. The culicine mosquitoes of the Indomalayan area. Part V. Genus Aedes
Meigen, subgenera Mucidus Theobald, Ochlerotatus Lynch Arribalzaga and
Neomelanoconion Newstead. London, Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). 62 p.
McDonald, William A.
1957a. The adults and immature stages of Aedes muelleri Dyar (Diptera: Culici-
dae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 50:505-511.
1957b. The adults and immature stages of Aedes purpureipes Aitken (Diptera:
Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Am., Ann. 50:529-535.
Meigen, Johann W.
1818. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europaischen zweiflugeligen
Insekten. Vol. 1. Aachen. 333 p.
Messersmith, Donald H.
1971. Extension of the distributional range of Aedes triseriatus (Say) to Green-
land. Mosq. Syst. Newsl. 3:7.
Nielsen, Lewis T., J.H. Arnell and J.H. Linam
1967. A report on the distribution and biology of tree hole mosquitoes in the
western United States. Calif. Mosq. Control Assoc., Proc. Pap. Annu. Conf.
35.:72-76.
Nielsen, Lewis T., J.H. Linam, J.H. Arnell and T.J. Zavortink
1968. Distributional and biological notes on the tree hole mosquitoes of the west-
ern United States. Mosq. News 28:361-365.
O’Meara, George F. and G.B. Craig, Jr.
1970a. Geographical variation in Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol.
Soc. Am., Ann. 63:1392-1400. Sept.
1970b. A new subspecies of Aedes atropalpus (Coquillett) from southwestern
United States (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 72:475-479.
14 Dec.
Owen, William B.
1937. The mosquitoes of Minnesota, with special reference to their biologies.
Minn. Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Tech. Bull. 126. 75 p.
Perez Vigueras, Ildefonso
1956. Los ixodidos y culicidos de Cuba. Su historia natural y medica. La Ha-
bana. 579 p.
Peryassu, Antonio G.
1908. Os culicideos do Brasil. Rio de J., Inst. Manguinhos. 407 p.
Pinto, Cesar
1932. Alguns mosquitos do Brasil e do oriente da Bolivia (Diptera. Culicidae).
Rev. Med.-Cir. Bras. 40:285-309.
Rozeboom, Lloyd E.
1942. The mosquitoes of Oklahoma. Okla. Agric. Mech. College, Agric. Exp.
Stn., Tech. Bull. T-16. 56 p.
Say, Thomas
1823. Descriptions of dipterous insects of the sored States. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., J. 3:9-54,73-104.
Schick, Robert .@
1970a. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XX. The terrens group of Aedes
138 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
(Finlaya). Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 5(3). 158 p.
1970b. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXIII. Additions and corrections
to the revision of the Aedes terrens group. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib.
7(1): 13-40.
Shannon, Raymond C.
1931. On the classification of Brazilian Culicidae with special reference to those
capable of harboring the yellow fever virus. Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 33:
125-164.
Shannon, Raymond C. and E. Del Ponte
1928. Los culicidos en la Argentina. Inst. Bacteriol. Malbran, B. Aires, Rev. 5:
— 29-140.
Shannon, Raymond C., L. Whitman and M. Franca
1938. Yellow fever virus in jungle mosquitoes. Science 88:110-111.
Shaw, Frank R. and S.A. Maisey
1961. The biology and distribution of the rockpool mosquito, Aedes atropalpus
(Coqg.). Mosq. News 21:12-16.
Soper, F.L., H. Penna, E. Cardoso, J. Serafim, Jr., M. Frobisher, Jr. and J. Pinheiro
1933. Yellow fever without Aedes aegypti. Study of a rural epidemic in the Valle
do Chanaan, Espirito Santo, Brazil, 1932. Am. J. Hyg. 18:555-587.
Steward, C.C. and J.W. McWade
1960. The mosquitoes of Ontario (Diptera: Culicidae) with keys to the species
and notes on distribution. Entomol. Soc. Ont., Proc. 91:121-188.
Stone, Alan
1961. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, supplement I (Diptera:
Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 63:29-52.
1967. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, supplement III (Dip-
tera: Culicidae). Entomol. Soc. Wash., Proc. 69:197-224.
Stone, Alan and K.L. Knight
1956. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Museum: II,
The genus Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 46:213-228.
1957. Type specimens of mosquitoes in the United States National Museum: VI,
Miscellaneous genera, addenda, and summary. Wash. Acad. Sci., J. 47:196-202.
Stone, Alan, K.L. Knight and H. Starcke
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culicidae).
Wash., Entomol. Soc. Am. (Thomas Say Found., vol. 6). 358 p.
Sudia, W. Daniel, V.F. Newhouse, C.H. Calisher and R.W. Chamberlain
1971. California group arboviruses: isolations from mosquitoes in North America.
Mosq. News 31:576-600.
Sudia, W. Daniel, V.F. Newhouse and B.E. Henderson
1971. Experimental infection of horses with three strains of Venezuelan equine
encephalomyelitis virus. II. Experimental vector studies. Am. J. Epidemiol.
93:206-211.
Theobald, Frederick V.
1907. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes. Vol. 4. Lond., Br. Mus.
(Nat... Hist.). 639° p.
Thompson, Wayne H., R.O. Anslow, R.P. Hanson and G.R. DeFoliart
1972. LaCrosse virus isolations from mosquitoes in Wisconsin, 1964-1968. Am.
J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 21:90-96.
Trapido, Harold and P. Galindo
1955. The investigation of a sylvan yellow fever epizootic on the north coast
Zavortink: New World Aedes 139
of Honduras, 1954. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4:665-674.
Trapido, Harold, P. Galindo and S.J. Carpenter
1955. A survey of forest mosquitoes in relation to sylvan yellow fever in the
Panama Isthmian area. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4:525-542.
Travis, Barney V. and R.M. Labadan
1967. Arthropods of medical importance in Latin America. Part I. U.S. Army
Natick Lab., Tech. Rep. 68-30-ES. 216 p.
Truman, James W. and G.B. Craig, Jr.
1968. Hybridization between Aedes hendersoni and Aedes triseriatus. Entomol.
Soc. Am., Ann. 61:1020-1025.
Turner, R.L.
1924. A new mosquito from Texas (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae
Mens. 12:84.
Vargas, Luis
1949. Nueva larva que corresponde probablemente a Aedes purpureipes Aitken,
1941. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. Trop., Rev. 10:261-265.
1950. Los subgeneros de Aedes. Downsiomyia n.subgen. (Diptera: Culicidae).
Inst. Salubr. Enferm. Trop., Rev. 11:61-69.
Vargas, Luis and W.G. Downs
1950. Tres especies nuevas de Aedes (Diptera, Culicidae). Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat.,
Rev. 11:161-172.
Waddell, Mary B.
1949. Comparative efficacy of certain South American Aedes and Haemagogus
mosquitoes as laboratory vectors of yellow fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. 29:
567-575.
Williston, Samuel W.
1896. On the Diptera of St. Vincent (West Indies). R. Entomol. Soc. Lond.,
Trans. 44:253-446.
Zavortink, Thomas J.
1968. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). VIII. A prodrome of the genus
Orthopodomyia. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 3(2). 221 p.
1970. Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXII. A new subgenus and species
of Aedes from Arizona. Am. Entomol. Inst., Contrib. 7(1):1-11.
140
ee Ome ce aes ees
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
FIGURES
Distribution of the species of the Triseriatus Group
Mesoscuta of the species of the Triseriatus Group
Aedes (P.) hendersoni; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (P.) hendersoni; larva
Aedes (P.) brelandi; adult morphology
Aedes (P.) brelandi; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (P.) brelandi; larva
Aedes (P.) triseriatus; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (P.) triseriatus; larva
Distribution of the species of the Zoosophus, Kompi and Knabi Groups
. Aedes (P.) zoosophus; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) zoosophus; larva
Mesoscuta of the females of the species of the Kompi Group
. Aedes (P.) burgeri; adult morphology
. Aedes (P.) burgeri; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) burgeri; larva
. Aedes (P.) kompi; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) kompi; larva
. Aedes (P.) schicki; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) schicki; larva
. Aedes (P.) chionotum; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) chionotum; larva
. Aedes (P.) niveoscutum; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (P.) niveoscutum; larva
. Aedes (P.) sandrae; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) sandrae; larva
. Aedes (P.) knabi; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (P.) knabi; larva
Distribution of the species of Kompia, Abraedes, Aztecaedes and Gymno-
metopa
Aedes (K.) purpureipes; adult morphology
. Aedes (K.) purpureipes; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (K.) purpureipes; larva
. Aedes (Abr.) papago; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (Abr.) papago; larva
. Aedes (Azt.) ramirezi; adult morphology
Aedes (Azt.) ramirezi; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (Azt.) ramirezi; larva
Aedes (G.) mediovittatus; adult morphology
. Aedes (G.) mediovittatus; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (G.) mediovittatus; larva
Distribution of Aedes (O.) muelleri
. Aedes (O.) muelleri; adult morphology
. Aedes (O.) muelleri; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (O.) muelleri; larva
Distribution of the species of the Atropalpus Section
. Aedes (O.) epactius; male genitalia and pupa
Zavortink: New World Aedes 141
. Aedes (O.) epactius; larva
. Aedes (O.) atropalpus; adult morphology
. Aedes (O.) atropalpus; male genitalia and pupa
Aedes (O.) atropalpus; larva
. Aedes (O.) fluviatilis; adult morphology
. Aedes (O.) fluviatilis; male genitalia and pupa
. Aedes (O.) fluviatilis; larva
Distribution of the species of Conopostegus
. Haemagogus (C.) leucotaeniatus; male genitalia and pupa
. Haemagogus (C.) leucotaeniatus; larva
. Haemagogus (C.) leucophoebus; male genitalia and pupa
Haemagogus (C.) leucophoebus; larva
. Haemagogus (C.) leucocelaenus; adult morphology
. Haemagogus (C.) leucocelaenus; male genitalia and pupa
. Haemagogus (C.) leucocelaenus; larva
. Haemagogus (C.) clarki; male genitalia and pupa
. Haemagogus (C.) clarki; larva
ee
PROTOMACLEAYA
Dae
aE
by WY} Og 2
i] ai:
eA h\ yy
PRY f) . e ry 7
Mie NN oS
a ; Te S/,
= by ZN e5 ‘ 5% OE
i
[)
zoe
Tou
Pa LAE TO
4 &
oe Vk
LOS
latus:
1ser
“Triser
a |
PAR OMIR Eo Ceilea OaNn
PARALLELS 33° & 45°
iatus
0, 2000, 3000, 7000, 9000 FOOT GCONTOURS
5000 FOOT CONTOUR
Ca)
=
=
ae
cal
=.
<
ee
2
op
=
<
e
op
‘at
Lx)
is
Z,
=
CONIC
500 600 700
STATUTE MILES
400
CONFORMAL
300
STANDARD
200
LAMBERT
100
EN
BY
he : y
) wi
of
eal 7)
CI = =
—) = 4
e 7) $ S x 8g
‘ba . § ym < 93
SD @ S85 5 oe
oe a — ae n° 5s
— =
@ =
a
Texas
United States
brelandi
—— SS
SSE SFEZ
PROTOMACLEAYA
Triseriatus Group
¥ Fig. 3 |
(Xa, ° PROTOMACLEAYA {V2
Yi
i\l
SW |
MA 1 fi
| i i
I
if
{
\
\
A c
——
CW
Wy
\ Ni
\
\ nN
\
\}
N
\
My
\4
\"
$i)
\\\
,
Z ai
“A\\'
\
Wh
\N
‘i
AW \\ @'\
\ \
\\
N
WAT}
NIN
hendersoni
HA-36-66
Wyoming
United States
Fig. 4
PROTOMACLEAYA
hendersoni
© asides FLL NOB Sg BUEN IEGE SEL DNLS OEEIEES IE WD
FORE Ni - HIND DIOPY FLL LLL LAS Aaa
Dom | . < : >>> SAA
~ mt ®@ = SSS LZ= SSSSSSSax —<<ZT
A. a= r. _— = mS a ~ a 3
UY,
Yj
Wy fp
Up
Pi ramenmenes:
LOI MINIT ANNIKA
We
ii i \\yS << Ros PRN ht LS
iiSMtinnae Midian \ et ATA UNV TE AW
PROTOMACLEAYA
brelandi
UCLA 613
Texas
United States
\) ) Fig. 6
PROTOMACLEAYA
UCLA 611
Texas
BS aN United States
eT ae,
8
Vas
2)
Sy
S
. Sk
= mS SS S
S$ SRY
V1
o
UCLA 613
United States
brelandi
UCLA 613
‘exas
United States
eae
Alabama
United States
Fig.8
PROTOMACLEAYA
Maryland
United States
AUN
RAN NY
NW
ra,
ch
| : : ~ Q eg 4 AKI \ =
QE WE SRAQIBSAH BY \)\
r \e ie BR ORIN SK \\\
YN Qy BSR \ Paneie TT VR
NASER \
\ Vas
a
a.
3 S
"OC =
Bis
7 A
UCLA 286 3
: A
SS
SS
SA
WV
SS
ae
triseriatus
Neue
He pete
|
500
STATUTE MILES
KILOMETERS
500 1000
>| MIDDLE AMERICA
65 “
ao} -
3 Z
M
¢ 7 <
EE + .
— 4
. *
> t
: AR i Ag iv
¢ }
ie 3 PSD HITS
35 fy}
ey y 6 1
Om
Q ’
F 99 a
x iy a
z “ JZ
’ RS a“ pay
one i
TIC
4 t ~ iS
30 S
25
"ae
60
20
«+ lee* ts
-
o an 6
Q
“.
ie
40
%
sys Ch
ae 4
os
a rvAs
$3
Q ue
L
zoosophus
‘|Zoosophus Gro
2NS
oe
Ne a m3, Sax ae
a LPF es << }
"@ Gar Nee
y a pal forty nu a
, Fy ene S
Cie BAL AS
§ rg 7} \
Loy \ EE
ays
tum
niveoscu
Fig. Il
zoosophus
UCLA 619
Texas
United States
i
| a Ai
i
i
burgeri
UCLA 562
Arizona
United States
schicki chionotum
MEX 698 MEX 304
Durango Morelos
Mexico Mexico
See iN.
Tema |\ ws
:
—=
SSS
|
® lit i
niveoscutum ue sandrae
MEX 671 GUA 125
Jalisco Guatemala
Mexico Guatemala
Kompi Group
Les
pA bd)
FS
a Fig. 14
~
SS
i AVG WANNA "
AA
TANI
ANN
NY
Ny
AN
Una nen wii :
TT
AN
. PROTOMACLEAYA
ANS
INS
AIAN
NSS
Y i\\ \
iN
My
4
4,
ey
Ud,
Ae
U, fs
an |
IN
\ \ My
Ww
\
\\
NYS
HA-12-68
Arizona
United States
a
Pov yyseee
)
o-
s
burgeri
-— 0.1——‘H1 U' CLA 253
Arizona
United States
HA-12-68
Arizona
United States
SS
SSS
>
SS
=
a
oe
°
0005
24°00 9e 85 0 0°98
@ g % 90° 909%e 090007 0, 0 4 6
SoS Oe OS Oe Oa 110: © 80" eo
Fig.15
PROTOMACLEAYA
UCLA 253
vizona
United States
UCLA 454
Arizona
United States
burgeri
HA-12-68
Arizona
United States
i
°
4
4
=)
Nn
om
~
ig. 17
PROTOMACLEAYA
D a =
===>
MEX 351
Morelos
Mexico
sP
8
13
A ste 12 9
MEX 350 q
Morelos an
Mexico 14
MEX 488
Durango
Mexico
\\ j Hef a
AU nl Aca
' i I:
4) i -
» .\
ee nen
\}
schicki
MEX 698
Durango
Mexico
| PROTOMACLEAYA
13 12 #. 9
10¢\ 7
1
vo
0,
8
A
=
Vit A ti
‘i HH
we. Sete vin
5
> My fag
\ Aff Sani, ,
| IN
\/ Fig. 21
PROTOMACLEAYA
chionotum
MEX 304
Morelos
Mexico
MP
Vil
@P
8
»
1 2 ‘
fo 14,42 Ging 3
7 1
] wr hh,
f i) 30\'
14
Vill
ait qf /
“i
Wi
Fig. 23 i
PROTOMACLEAYA
@
ee
5 Ws RQ sp
4 RY SRS
vf aN a I
ote ZZ; Ml
Hs I~
MEX 669 a td & Te
Jalisco € feet a
Mexico Mi J ; a \
3 1
6 : IN
pig
a
oF.
i 2 — sv
aS
—<—->
‘ eG
Z u cs
Lec}
Lb—-<t°S
‘ es ‘
QN
[ i}
ZZ
SER = EF '
= a = ay (Ss
Z
— Ei
eS
ie
ANS
\Y
7 (ha er Ss = ESR
+ eB Seco ans Ge Se he
BS . aD Nhe. Ge] SS
) ES Ss
i pon
f eee A
F Rayan I
ae: Ol
4 BK it
wA areal tes
>>, CEN ed -
ESN patdasiat Z
; IA
RAAT tes =a
UN ZS
Aes 4
Nite >
ANS
(es
)
|
\
\
SS
ms Zs
lisco
{ niveoscutum
MP
‘oe :
h PROTOMACLEAYA
VII
ae:
8
\
13
9 2
crea, 22 rN Qi Ayr Say
h 5 1
10 / \ | \
ial e-=-—
CS 14 oN
Vill
AN ae
Gi \
niveoscutum
MEX 675
Jalisco
Mexico PT
Fig. 25
PROTOMACLEAYA
\ (
FA LD =
wT a ——
Ke <a fi = J, ae
ZA — Si a,
BEE SSS ee
LE
sandrae
GUA 125
Guatemala
Guatemala
Cc
Fig. 27
PROTOMACLEAYA
knabi
MEX 104
Oaxaca
Mexico
1.0 MP
| PROTOMACLEAYA
knabi : ee
MEX 104
Oaxaca
Mexico
PT
CeS96U-INS-ADOTOOZ-VION® vote ZOCIW JO S30LINDSOW
SATIN ALALVLS
00s
00s
" GHALAWOTIN
ORIN ed
IW |
oe
enyey7] Ao pau ae =o Zz
» VO LAWONWAD ‘ee
“<Sadavugy,
nase
sa
“saqavoaLzy
oseded 2a,
ye
i
°
KOMPIA
FORE MID HIND
i
i
-—— 0.1 ——__+]
SSS
E77
shige
purpureipes
UCLA 247
Baja California Sur
Mexico
<—<——
WY
WZ
Gj
Uy
Fig. 31
KOMPIA =
AN il aH,
\ Noh hi
RS Se i:
\\;
purpureipes
UCLA 247
Baja California Sur
Fig. 33°
ABRAEDES
ae
MN)
ae
Wi
“<=
a
eZ
Ik
papago
Ul
Arizona
mnited States
2 tS Clk
Di.
Lin iy
Li)
H
! “ een TU
hearer
Hii WA
G7),
jy
Hye
As £
(G72
Y
Y
Y
Yo:
N77
Wh
WW
SN
YW Lf Gi
YI 4
SLE GG)
YY)
l
Yj, Z Uy Vi
SSS
Y 3 tip Li,
Z Yj
MEX 626
Morelos
Mexico
ramirezi
MEX 628
Morelos
Mexico
Fig. 36
AZTECAEDES
)\\
QFE ~——A
Za S a —
s— — Y ao ct:
oe
F .
A
- ~ > > \'
a\Oarr AY S S|
HN
Ni |
. \" ‘\,
KS a
at! is eS A ==
SS ars <a ivi
=J = oe
ramirezi
MEX 348
Morelos
Mexico
7 2)
(eal
=
Pe)
<&
O
ee
>,
@ ee
| Vs <
° =z a Ses 3 SS >> >>, >
I) Yip
Minin |
! | Hi ith ye ational : rat teTennn NN AN \\\
: GYMNOMET OP A Han eR iii mma
Hen
NN
why)
JA 397
Jamaica
JA 699
Jamaica
. ( mediovittatus
JA 624
Jamaica
Fig. 39
GYMNOMETOPA
JA 699
Jamaica
\
\
fi ¢
"NZ
h\ i hf ZA
ii
My MEG
\ | / Ny y
NMA
yl
LN
i is Noy. “ail \
Seat is igsun
rw aN
\
u
JA 627
Jamaica
mediovittatus
; 11 a
4,5 2 ¢ a
RV
AA
WA WA 1 I
———-S
. Sy
Zs
/,
3
6 \s \ t | ( /
P kh, <\
| AQ Wa GX)
R\(/: ie
1.0
GYMNOMETOPA
so
1.0
mediovittatus
a PT
Haiti
2-$961-1N3-A90100Z-V19N
SATIN ALALVLS
00s
00s
ool
SYA LAWO TINA
VOINHINV HI
ool os 0
oor os 0
Yhez
=—\
JJo]]onuT
as ASdnos poTeny
R\. ¢
%
BW ASS
>)
Nii,
nae )
Viviun SS
MII Hh HIAKHAI
a secs
RET ANG
RAR WK
AN AN
aS
See
=
Ss SS
= 2
Ses
SS
=
SSS
See
SSS
4 ;
Hein
“lh
muelleri
Arizona
United States
Fig. 43 i
ey ° — OCHLEROTATUS
|
\
— ZF DS 1
a
rf
Oo
y
( f .
t) y
if
i |
vt
\\
\
muelleri
MEX 394
Mexico
Mexico
“Y
Bb f f,
11 9 > b,
iN Yj s
!
3 2 SF \®
‘ES 2 6
8 es
4 9
muelleri
PT
MEX 394
Mexico
Mexico
Neer
~
a : <—3e> ihe
co -. Atropal
5 a Cal 7 Nez io A oe
a Atropalpus Group
atropalpus
a8,
a
Seo gee ae epactius _..0
Fluviatilis Group
fluviatilis
Equator
NORTH & SOUTH AMERICA
KILOMETERS
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 :
0 500 1500 i 2000
1000
STATUTE MILES
Fig. 46
OCHLEROTATUS
MEX 236
Veracruz
Mexico
\
\y
¥
\
=
MEX 269
Veracruz
Mexico
epactius
OCHLEROTATUS
1.0 13 {
a a 1 7 Ie st ; >
wane
cs & es
Vill
: yf gin wi ‘
x
aie
epactius
MEX 236
Veracruz PT
Mexico
Fig. 49
OCHLEROTATUS
Sigs po Ld
2 BE
BEZEALx—_=>>
ZZ
= Z = = —_
E = ZA FZ ZZ
Z E ma ass eo is
LZ, cs Zz Ze at
a 2 ~ Me ZS
ZS.
SELLE EE =a CZ
ie @ oc = = —— FF
) \
atropalpus ™
Maryland
United States
(|
Se SL
MP
OCHLEROTATUS
atropalpus i;
United States
1 : "| ieee = Ee a ane a een EES
me : Lae See a oP SSS SSF _ g z
EEG AC SSS Z eae
| —, PE a > SIRES =n ‘> : : ~ SS ? = :
ASTIN \\\t
(KS
ue
FRTUR TR K NNN
t NN ty WY
0 C HLERO TATU S Th viii an i i
AN \
VE Z
Vile
LLZp hij;
ZZ ip
Zp pp
fluviatilis
FG 167
Inini
French Guiana
CSS
SSS
°
0 0008
Pe 09 0%? Me
Fig. 52
OCHLEROTATUS
French Guiana
4
>
the
: : Pe Lie i y P)
e Z s “Ay
%& . yy ; Ee.
B83 SS ’ 5 y %
p Uy z
fe Q Oe Zo
See i, re J
5 4 : 0 x >
: v
Ah 2
if “al eye
DS
2
fp Zs
|
v
mcey
qtropre of ©*
leucocelaenus
7
% 3
" %
Nw" {
N; — LS
S| 4)
f
leucotaeniatus
Small Colombian form %
Peruvian lowland form—: ee
Peruvian highland form é
~. leucophoebus’” we
Se eee BW /
ate _ a ) aS V ; Tropic of Cabricory
aa Ea, ms j \
NORTH & SOUTH AMERICA
KILOMETERS "a8
1500 2000 25 3 s . :
fas: = ie MG fs »
1500
1000
500 1000
STATUTE MILES
Fig. 55
CONOPOSTEGUS
VL
Nie }
ay
' A , 9
ASRS Ey
NES WS WE ar
oP
wy ty
GO 0 ere
er
er
met
»
)
\S
ie
FSS CONOPOSTEGUS
leucotaeniatus
Panama
Fig.57 “ly
CONOPOSTEGUS
TO) aceon 9 rape arora |
- CONOPOSTEGUS
yy ff
i if) - SS
1H
iy Hin
| Mi | AN i | | il “hi
\
RR ite RAN WAY \\ SAN
\ i i AN ANN iN WINN ANY A
AAA
iN
BZ
Se gts Rea
ty
f My A
i
=
=
=
=
|. HIND sss) ag )
o ft MQ
leucocelaenus
cae i aes tee eat
Fig. 60
CONOPOSTEGUS
41> o&
ees ian
Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
MW,
Ff
a ih | Be ay:
VES
WN v ie ay
v
,
¢g
. 7 leucocelaenus
\\
we
Guanabara
Brazil
Sr
: =
O
Gas
ae.
SZ i
©
An
=
Zz,
©
i)
Fig. 62
CONOPOSTEGUS
7
7}
PZ
Yep ZV
ZS
clarki
Zavortink: New World Aedes 205
SYSTEMATIC INDEX
Abraedes, 3, 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 59, 61, 66
Aedes, 3, 10, 14, 15, 59, 60, 65, 66, 71,
TEY9F, 9821021 14 Sy 146
Aedes n.sp. of authors, 42, 121, 128, 130
aegypti (Aedes), 3, 4, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 65,
126
alba (Orthopodomyia), 23
alleni (Aedes), 35
atropalpus (Aedes), 4, 30, 91, 96, 97k, 97,
98, 99, 102-105; figs. 45, 48-50
atropalpus (Aedes) of authors, 98, 102
Atropalpus Group, 3, 93, 93k, 94k, 94-97,
100, 108
Atropalpus Section, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 10k, 89-
94
Aztecaedes, 3, 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 59, 66,
66-67, 71, 100
brelandi (Aedes), 14, 18, 19, 19k, 20k, 22,
25-27, 29, 87; figs. 1, 2, 5-7
burgeri (Aedes), 39, 39k, 40k, 41k, 42k, 42-
44,45, 51, 60, 66, 87; figs. 10, 13-16
chionotum (Aedes), 13, 39, 40k, 41k, 47,
47-49; figs. 10, 13, 21, 22
cinereus (Aedes), 10
clarki (Haemagogus), 116, 117k, 118k, 119k,
120, 127-130, 130, 131; figs. 54, 62, 63
confirmatus (Aedes), 81
Conopostegus, 3, 4, 111-119, 123, 126
draconarius (Aedes), 106
epactius (Aedes), 22, 37, 71, 96, 96k, 97k,
97-102, 103, 104, 109; figs. 45-47
Finlaya, 3, 15, 78, 87, 115
fluviatilis (Aedes), 4, 34, 91, 93k, 94k, 97,
100, 104, 106-111; figs. 45, 51-53
fluviatilis (Aedes) of authors, 35, 98
Fluviatilis Group, 3, 93, 93k, 94k, 95, 96,
106
gabriel (Aedes), 45, 71, 100
Gualteria, 10
Gymnometopa, 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 59, 66,
Th, aad ds tS
Haemagogus, 3, 4, 4k, 5k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 66,
111,115, 116
hendersoni (Aedes), 14, 18, 19, 19k, 20k, 20-
25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 37, 100; figs. 1-4
Heteronycha, 86
Howardina, 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 59, 66, 77
idanus (Aedes), 45, 71
iridipennis (Aedes), 81, 82
judithae (Anopheles), 27
knabi (Aedes), 13, 14, 15k, 16k, 53-55; figs.
10, 27, 28
Knabi Group, 3, 15, 15k, 16k, 53
kompi (Aedes), 39, 40k, 41k, 42k, 43, 44-
46; figs. 10, 13, 17, 18
kompi (Aedes) of authors, 42, 43
Kompi Group, 3, 15, 16k, 17k, 37-42, 43,
47, 49, 50, 52
Kompia, 3, 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 55, 59, 66, 87
kummi (Orthopodomyia), 27
laguna (Aedes), 86
Large Colombian form (Haemagogus), 4, 116,
117k, 121, 122, 131
lepidus (Aedes), 3
leucocelaenus (Haemagogus), 4, 111, 115, 116,
117k, 118k, 119k, 120, 124-127, 129; figs.
54, 59-61
leucocelaenus (Haemagogus) of authors, 119,
121, 122, 127, 128, 130
Leucocelaenus Group, 3
leucomelas (Haemagogus), 119, 124, 128
leucophoebus (Haemagogus), 116, 117k, 118k,
120, 122-124, 129; figs. 54, 57, 58
leucotaeniatus (Haemagogus), 111, 116, 117k,
118k, 119-121, 121, 122, 129; figs. 54-56
leucotaeniatus (Haemagogus) of authors, 128
lithoecetor (Aedes), 106
Longipalpifer, 116
mediomaculata (Aedes), 106
mediovittatus (Aedes), 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k,
72-81; figs. 29, 38-40
Mediovittatus Group, 78
milleri (Aedes), 3
206 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 3, 1972
monticola (Aedes), 43, 59, 87
muelleri (Aedes), 3, 5k, 6k, 8k, 9k, 27, 43,
47, 60, 81-89; figs. 41-44
Muelleri Group, 81
nielseni (Aedes), 96, 98, 100
nigra (Aedes), 3, 27
niveoscutum (Aedes), 39, 40k, 41k, 43, 49-
51, 52; figs. 10, 13, 23, 24
Ochlerotatus, 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 10k, 15,
37, 71, 81, 86, 87, 93, 100
oswaldi (Aedes), 10
papago (Aedes), 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 43, 61-
66; figs. 29, 33, 34
perichares (Aedes), 96, 97, 98, 100, 102
Peruvian highland form (Haemagogus), 117k,
121, 122; fig. 54
Peruvian lowland form (Haemagogus), 117k,
130, 131; fig. 54
podographicus (Aedes), 52, 60
Protomacleaya, 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 10k,
10-17, 22, 27, 37, 45, 46, 66, 71, 87, 100,
104
Pulchritarsis Group, 86, 87
Pulchritarsis Section, 5k, 6k, 8k, 9k, 10k, 15,
81, 87
Pulchritarsis-Varipalpus Group, 86
pullatus (Aedes), 86
purpureipes (Aedes), 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 43,
55-61, 66, 87; figs. 29-32
ramirezi (Aedes), 3, 4k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k, 66,
67, 67-72, 100; figs. 29, 35-37
sandrae (Aedes), 14, 39, 40k, 41k, 50, 51,
51-53; figs. 10, 13, 25, 26
schicki (Aedes), 39, 40k, 41k, 46-47, 48, 49,
87; figs. 10, 13, 19, 20
scutellalbum (Aedes), 3
sierrensis (Aedes), 22
signifera (Orthopodomyia), 23
Small Colombian form (Haemagogus), 4, 116,
117k, 121, 130-131, 131; fig. 54
splendens (Haemagogus), 111
Stegoconops, 116
Stegomyia, 3, 5k, 6k, 7k, 8k, 9k
sumidero (Aedes), 52
tehuantepec (Aedes), 54
Terrens Group, 3, 4, 8k, 15, 16k, 17k, 45,
52, 60
tripunctata (Aedes), 106
triseriatus (Aedes), 4, 10, 17, 18, 19, 19k,
20k, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27-34, 37, 104; figs.
1,2:8,9
triseriatus (Aedes) of authors, 20
Triseriatus Group, 3, 15, 15k, 16k, 17k, 17-
20, 37
uncatus (Aedes), 72
upatensis (Aedes), 3
varipalpus (Aedes), 86, 87
Varipalpus Group, 3, 4, 5k, 6k, 8k, 10k, 86,
87
zoosophus (Aedes), 13, 14, 15k, 16k, 17k,
22, 30, 34-37, 100; figs. 10-12
Zoosophus Group, 3, 15, 15k, 16k, 17k, 34
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 8, Number 4, 1972
oy"
A revision of the termitophilus tribe Feldini (Coleoptera,
Staphylinidae) with a numerical analysis of the relation-
ships of the species and genera. By David H. Kistner
The reorganization of the Dorylocerus Complex by the use
of numerical analysis with some new distribution records
and new data on their behavior.
By John L. Baker & David H. Kistner
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PSP C Ves eae cs he's Oka dwe dee NEG Re A hE Lac Bg Saale ae ar 1
DR os, 5S od ae oes Wee eae Ce Bw ee 6 See Re es See 6 08008 1
PEC a ee ae Sod Vive Ww eee A AI Gees Koa es eee wees 2
TRIBE -FPELDIN 4 2 0c. Gao oes 0 dis So my ead ne MESES OR eens Saran <n ea 2
KEY TO MYRMEDONIINE-RELATED TRIBES ..........ccccccsecccees 3
oe Pe a A Oo BL 4s ok ais s Ga eee o Ss Oe WS leks ON ae es 3
ee py ee yl, psu en Tacha als, Mea as Gi airy rae Roe asls Sg btad's: k= inn oh Woe gy BDA a 4
Re Cr eater ee oe espe cea. So ate he gael: Pp acer e a eats eee awh 4 arate’ «> 7
A ee ap cies is aah | eee NH Ss LB hap Oey Kw ew Oe Sow Oe os oe sade 8
Me Bigs yaad in a Rae ole. ward hk hes ages 4 Be ack aecietla elle aoe 6 9.0 vbw ace o's 9
B GCADVILCHIMNIUIS © nce pies ooo 40 00.60 8 OED nae eta oa be cee gas eee see tee 10
p=) (22-0 (6): 11
2S Pa iy eer ee ee wer tr ere eee er eee ie 12
ay 2 ao ear fa ree ee ee ee ee eee eee ee Se ee 12
CR CRON yy a ek 5 Sc eg ne wis be ge oe aoe 6S Pees wee wake sie ee 13
Dicuspidoxenus EMeErsond ...... 6c. c cece reset acssvervens 16
DUS st Swe vi he costae le SAB eS a Geo fos os ob oS Ae eee ek ee wee 17
D. kKrishnai ..... cece ce cee cece cee cece e erence cree eee eneeerence 19
ih ie ae hy Goh sala es orale g ey in Gay Se NC SE Ore eR eee bale ha a 20
Pee) OOM CHG BS io ais ese. 6 ose eae swe e0 bie 6 one ow es Le Mora atid oie 23
ORR Festi iodo ae Wl in ni a wie hal elvieiase) oa a/¥ we Hoe tile oe O¥ Hike we oe ee 8% 23
Gems Pictu son ris a bse SES 0S ae Se dale a ea 24
PCRS OMS OVACTIIG otis ica ain na so SG ne bed a opine «8 we sb pe ee wee ba
Bee niin eh aie Tig es eee sR ee eae ne Tae a OE OR meee 8 os 29
D. platycollis SUS ang Dap le sates Gain APA Coed Gai ar gt AR cli dhe ematp-armtinie Wo aiiece we 31
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES AND HOST
Fe A DON SES oe Fle tie eie ce ace ew eee oe bine dele ek ces wo $ ere ele neue oe 31
LITERATURE CITED .. cc cccceeccncccccscccveres Pee eae Se eee ee 35
A REVISION OF THE TERMITOPHILOUS TRIBE
FELDINI (COLEOPTERA, STAPHYLINIDAE)
WITH A NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
RELATIONSHIPS OF THE SPECIES AND GENERA!
By
David H. Kistner
ABSTRACT
The subtribe Feldina, formerly part of the tribe Myrmidoniini is herewith
raised to tribal status, redescribed, and a key for discriminating most of the
related tribes is provided. All of the species formerly known are redescribed
and most are illustrated. Three genera, Tekalita (type: T. nemorosus), Di-
cuspidoxenus (type: D. emersoni), and Dicuspiphilus (type: D. orientis) are
described as new. The following 11 new species are also described: Felda
asteria (Malaya); F. eleanorae (Sarawak); F. kingi (Sarawak); Dicuspidoxenus
emersoni (Sarawak): D. javanicus (Java); D. krishnai (Malaya); Tekalita ne-
morosus (Sarawak); T. borneensis (Borneo): Dicuspiphilus orientis (Sarawak);
D. multiseta (Sarawak): and D, platycollis (Sarawak). Keys are provided to
all genera and species. A dendrogram representing the results of the numer-
ical analysis of the relationships of the genera and species is presented. The
host relationships of the species are discussed.
INTRODUC TION
The tribe Feldini was first proposed as a subtribe of the Myrmedoniini by
Seevers (1957, p. 236). The only characteristics he gave were the presence
of strongly sclerotized physogastric abdomens without large areas of mem-
branous development. Since he only saw specimens of the genus Felda as in-
terpreted here, he was unaware of the characteristics of the other genera de-
scribed here. He also lacked dissectable material so it is natural that he did
not figure or describe the mouthparts. In his short diagnoses of the genera,
he noted that none of the 3 genera described by Wasmann exhibited convincing
differences.
In this paper, I shall redefine the subtribe Feldini and raise it to tribal
status. I shall then provide a key to the aleocharine tribes that probably e-
volved from myrmedoniine ancestors. Raising the Feldini to tribal status is
necessary or it becomes impossible to adequately define the tribe Myrmedon-
lThis study was financed in part by the National Science Foundation (Grant
No. GB-28661X)
2Address: Shinner Institute for the Study of Interrelated Insects, Dept. of
Biology, California State University, Chico, California 95926
2 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
iini. After this is done 4 genera will be described, 3 of them new. Eleven
new species will also be described. All of the new species and the new genera
were collected by Alfred E. Emerson during a trip to the Far East in 1963 and
this revision would not have been possible and would not have been attempted
except for the availability of this excellent material. After the descriptions of
the genera and species, an analysis of the relationships of the genera and spe-
cies will be made using numerical methods.
The methods used in this paper have been described many times previous-
ly, most recently by Kistner (1968).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank Alfred E. Emerson for collecting the material which made
this study possible, for providing the host names cited herein, and for dis-
cussing various features of termite evolution with me from time to time,
which have influenced some of the interpretations made herein. I also wish to
thank Mr. Henry Dybas for permitting me to study the excellent staphylinid
collections under his supervision in the Field Museum of Natural History,
Chicago and for discussing various aspects of this paper with me when I was
recently in Chicago.
I also wish to thank the following Shinner assistants who have aided in var-
ious aspects of this study: William Blackburn, Daniela Davison, Jan Fischer,
Joy Goodwin, Herbert Jacobson, Joseph Martin, Nancy Piastuch, Riley Swift,
and Angela Vendsel.
TRIBE FELDINI NEW STATUS
Subtribe Feldina Seevers 1957: 236
To separate this tribe from all of the related tribes, please use the key
that follows. While I have attempted to include all aleocharine tribes that are
related to the Myrmedoniini, the users of the key must remember that at this
point all of the genera have not been revised and that this key is likely to be-
come more extensive as time goes on.
In addition to characters shared by all Staphylinidae and all Aleocharinae,
the tribe Feldini has the following characteristics which vary by tribe.
Head capsule lacking a neck or a nuchal ridge. Submentum, gula and men-
tum fused together. Antennae 11-segmented with the petioles of the segments
distinct; 11th segment without coeloconic sensillae. Mandibles asymmetrical.
Maxillary acetabulae not emarginate. Maxillary palpi 4-segmented. Galea
shorter than the first 3 segments of the maxillary palpus. Labial palpi 3-seg-
mented. Procoxal cavities closed behind by membrane in which are embedded
the slender strap-like mesothoracic peritremes. Mesosternum about half the
length of the metasternum. Mesocoxal cavities widely separated. Mesocoxal
acetabulae only partially emarginate. Wings present, venation just like that
of most staphylinids, as in Fig. 39 and 64. Tarsal formula 4-5-5. Form of
abdomen variable by genus. Abdominal segment I always attached to the me-
tanotum. Segment II always represented by the tergite only. Segments III-VI
always with 2 pairs of paratergites each although the shape and form of these
varies by genus.
2: 54)
3 (2)
4 (3)
5 (3)
7 (6)
8 (7)
9 (8)
10 (8)
2 (1)
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 3
KEY TO MYRMEDONIINE - RELATED TRIBES
Tarsal formula other than 4-5-5 ....cccccscccncescvcscccecccsees
other tribes of Aleocharinae (as well as some specialized genera
of some of the tribes below).
Tar sal formula 45058 LOPS Se iw a CEI 5 ose a ale 0b le wae 6 Mas 2
Gula-submentum and mentum all fused ROMSCHST A Py. whe ain ep secure Feldini
Mentum distinctly separate from the submentum-gula...........06. 3
Mesothoracic peritremes very large and expanded, closing the
procoxal cavities behind, ....... ccs ccccrcccscccccsecaccconns “
Mesothoracic peritremes strap-like, often inconspicuously
embedded in the MEMbDrane ..... ccc rcccccccccccccsscvscecrcsees 5)
Sides of antennal segments produced anteriorly and posteriorly so
as to completely cover the petioles of the segments ..... Pygostenini
Antennal segments with distinct petioles ...........-.000. Falagriini
Galea at least as long as the first 3 segments of the maxillary
palpus collectively, often longer... 1... ce. cs ese cece Myrmedoniini
Galea shorter than the 1st 3 segments of the maxillary palpus....... 6
Head highly modified with cylindrical eyes and ventral holes to
expose facets of these eyes. Dorsal surface of body contain-
ing many highly modified spatulate setae........... Phyllodinardini
HeAd MOL SO COMSUPUCUGE 100. se -6'vin aoa Kaw ow hie See 4 Shee wR inte o's Shige 7
Abdominal segments II-VI singly or collectively constricted to
TOP MUA: PETIONC s .- «:isls | orale otelenate primitive genera of Dorylomimini
ADAOMIEN NOL CONST LETC Ee eee ss okie dle Giwlsy aaie A igtte: oath We RMI a ohn “bik rere whe 8
OMY. FOV TINIINOUE! 6 sitive: 5 5c outaire adesalaveyeuetane pees 4s)! nls eileen ye set aeAs neg Sita ate 9
Body form elonGate-OrwpnySOPaSer 16 eo yiy ass Wisin ao 8e 8ip ew nletate cere Siig me 10
Vertex produced into a cariniform arcade anteriorly; pronotum
sreatly overlapping head, but partially visible
nthe dorsal View. ¢ week aticitaics diya tis aw ele ee woe Pseudoperinthini
Vertex normal without a cariniform arcade; pronotum com-
pletely overlapping the head 1. auc led ees alee sew ees Termitodiscini
Head without the above characteristics i064 .ivs «eee cee ae ones os
some genera of the tribe Athetini with 4-5-5 tarsal formulae
Maxillary palpi greatly modified with segments 2 and 3 greatly
enlarged and subtriangular in shape; labial palpi highly mod-
ified with segments 1 and 2 lobe-like................. Skatitoxenini
Maxillary and labial palpi not highly modified, shaped as shown
here in the Feldini; maxillary acetabulae not emarginate........
as ib aes gt APR aot: alte eat ode Ata aa Ma teal il dem area ates ag Ma eae Aedes aca 6155 Termitopaedini
Maxillary acetabulae emanginate Gi. ub vdc os pare laine: «ew eels
some genera of the tribe Athetini with 4-5-5 tarsal formulae;
Deremini; and Ecitocharini
KEY TO GENERA OF FELDINI
Paratergites scarcely visible, reduced to very thin membranous
ebteppentanrn OSAP) ct ie TPR MR yi i diay shia le oo ie Dicuspiphilus (p. am
Paratergites sclerotized and plainly visible.........cceceseccsecns
Pronotiim semicircwlar: GP SUbGUAGrate 2. e8. 2 cs)sew «00 eaevelee Saeraere ae :
Prong eatipanulatio neue sie PRO LA ee Tekalita (p. 20)
4 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
3 (2) Abdomen enlarged but not physogastric; dorsal rim of the abdomen
between the outer paratergites and the sternites...............
SVVECLN SU SS SEEN TET ON SUN ae brane. Oeue 08 Dieuspidoxenus (p: 13)
Abdomen physogastric; dorsal rim of abdomen between the parater -
STOR EG sp eee eres es obs Os COUT St ee elds (0.5
Fig. 1-3. --Dorsal appearance of whole beetle: 1, Felda borneensis; 2, Dicuspidoxenus
krishnai; 3, Tekalita nemorosus.
Genus Felda Blackwelder
Disticta Wasmann 1916: 184. New Synonymy.
Asticta Wasmann 1916: 185.
Termitobiella Wasmann 1916: 187; Seevers 1957: 237 (additional descrip-
tive notes). New Synonymy.
Felda Blackwelder 1952: 165 (new name for Asticta Wasmann, preoccu-
pied); Seevers 1957: 237 (additional descriptive notes).
Zunia Blackwelder 1952: 409 (new name for Disticta Wasmann, preoccu-
pied); See Seevers 1957: 236 (additional descriptive notes). New Synonymy.
Distinguished from all other genera by the appearance of the pronotum and
the abdomen alone. There are also differences in the mouthparts.
Overall shape as in Fig. 1. Head capsule somewhat oval in shape, wider
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 5
than long, without a distinct neck or nuchal ridge. Antennae inserted between
the eyes just lateral to the insertion of the anterior arms of the tentorium; 11-
segmented, shaped as in Fig. 4. Gula relatively short with the sides fairly
straight; fused to the submentum which broadens out anteriorly. Submentum
fused to the mentum. Mandibles not quite symmetrical, shaped as in Fig. 9
and 10, with evenly rounded median teeth. Maxillae shaped as in Fig. 8; palpi
4-segmented. Maxillary acetabulae without distinct margins. Labium shaped
as in Fig. 5; palpi 3-segmented. Labrum shaped as in Fig. 7.
Pronotum wider than long, shaped as in Fig. 12, with the lateral margins
evenly rounded into the posterior margin. Prosternum relatively short with
normal sized anterolateral articulation processes. Procoxal cavities closed
behind by membrane in which are located the straplike and lightly sclerotized
mesothoracic peritremes. Meso- and metanotum shaped as in Fig. 13. Mes-
osternum about half the length of the metasternum, shaped as in Fig. 11.
Mesocoxae relatively widely separated by a broadly produced but acarinate
process of the metasternum. Mesocoxal acetabulae only partially margined.
Wings present, of normal size, with the usual staphylinid venation. Elytra
shaped as in Fig. 6, without distinction. Pro-, meso-, and metalegs shaped
as in Fig. 15, 17, and 16 respectively; tarsal formula 4-5-5,
Abdomen physogastric, shaped as in Fig. 1. Segment I represented by the
tergite fused to the metanotum (Fig. 13). Segment II represented only by a
tergite. Segments III-VI with 1 tergite, 1 sternite, and 2 pairs of paratergites
each, Segment VII with 1 tergite, 1 sternite, and 1 pair of paratergites. In-
ner paratergites about 4 times as wide as the outer paratergites and a little
less than half the width of the tergites. Tergite VII with the 2 small openings
of the tergal gland present at the anterior margin, 1 on each side of midline.
Segment VIII represented by tergite and sternite only. Dorsal margin of the
abdomen formed between the inner and the outer paratergites. Segment [Xtri-
lobed, shaped as in Fig. 14, anterior apodemes of males very conspicuous.
Segment IX of male with an extra elongate piece present; probably represent-
ing the sternite of segment IX. Male genitalia bulbous, shape somewhat vari-
able by species. Female spermatheca sclerotized, shape somewhat variable
by species.
Type species. - of Felda: butteli (Wasmann); Blackwelder 1952: 165.
of Termitobiella: setipes (Wasmann); Blackwelder 1952:
376
of Zunia: capritermitis Wasmann; Blackwelder 1952: 409
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF FELDA
1 Large species pronotum length 0.39 or larger...........ceceeseees 2
Smaller species, pronotum length 0. 36 or leSS..........eeeeeeeees 3
2 (1) Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows:
Oy Sy By By Bere Fi as ee Pes pee eR es F. borneensis (p. 8 )
Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows:
0, 4, 486s Se ees Pe A es F. setipes (p. 12)
3 (1) Abdomen without macrochaetae.........cceccecees MARE AEN |: 4
Abdomen: with major Bethe dyes. oo. ENS Ok BSS OPES UI i 8 5
4 (3) Pronotum with 2 deep fossae on disc.......... F, capritermitis (p.10)
Pronotum without deep fossae; smooth............... F. butteli (p. 9)
5 (3) Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows:
Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Fig. 4-14. --Generic characters of Felda: F. kingi: 4, antenna; 5, labium; 6, elytron;
7, labrum; 8, maxilla; 9, right mandible; 10, left mandible; 11, meso- and metasternum;
12, pronotum; 13, meso- and metanotum and scutellum. F. setipes: 14, abdominal seg-
ment IX,
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini |
03°F 2:6 2 CEOS WE CR ee Sasterin! (pt)
Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VI as follows:
Oe, ead bse Mets ois ae ee es ae oe ee ee ee
6 (5) Pronotum with 2 setae; one on each side of the midline at the
anterior Borders) 620000 ORS OP eleamorae tp. fF)
Pronotum without any setae near the midline on the anterior
border tS ev eS A Ea ee Os eae a)
Fig. 15-17. --Felda generic characters: F. kingi: 15, proleg; 16, metaleg; 17, mesoleg.
Felda asteria, n. Sp.
Figure 28
Related to F. setipes, from which it is distinguished by its chaetotaxy as
well as the shape of the spermatheca. Distinguished from F. borneensis by
its smaller size as well as the shape of the spermatheca.
Color reddish brown throughout with all parts of the body except the mem-
8 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
branes about the same shade of reddish brown. Dorsal surface of the head,
pronotum, elytra, and sclerotized parts of the abdomen smooth and shiny.
Macrochaetotaxy of pronotum as follows: Anterior border with 4 macrosetae.
Lateral borders with 3 macrosetae each. Disc with 4 major setae, to each
side of the midline, and 1 in each lateral third near the middle. Macrochaeto-
taxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: 0, 4, 6, 6, 6, 0, 4. Outer para-
tergites II-VI with 1 macroseta each. Inner paratergites with no macrosetae.
Sternites with an apical row on each segment. Male unknown. Spermatheca
shaped as in Fig. 28.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 35-0. 36; elytra length, 0. 33-0. 36.
Number measured, 3..
Holotype--1, female, 13962, Malaya, Selangor, Semangkok Forest Re-
serve, 8 mi. 8. Gap, 2000', 14 Mar. 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emer-
son, (DK).
Paratypes--2,females, same data as holotype, (DK).
Notes--The host termites were determined to be Dicuspiditermes sp. C by
Alfred E. Emerson, specimens of which are in the Emerson collection of the
American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Felda borneensis (Cameron) n. comb.
Figures 1, 20, 24, 29
Asticta borneensis Cameron 1943: 141, Type: British Museum (Natural
History), London, (Sarawak, Mt. Poi, 3000‘).
Most closely related to F. asteria from which it is easily distinguished by
the abdominal macrochaetotaxy as well as the shape of the spermatheca.
Color dark reddish brown throughout with the abdomen and appendages
somewhat lighter than the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pro-
notum, and abdomen smooth and shiny with no conspicuous sculpture present.
Pronotum with 4 setae on the anterior border, 2 of these to either side of the
midline and the other 2 at each of the corners. Posterolateral border with 5
setae evenly spaced on each. Disc with 4 setae, 2 on each side of the midline
directly beneath the anterior 1 and 1 directly posterior to the corner seta in
each lateral third. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows:
2, 4, 6, 6, 6, 0, 4. Outer paratergites of segments III-VII each with 1 seta.
Inner paratergites without any setae. Sternites with many setae irregularly
scattered over the surfaces. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig.
20. Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 24. Spermatheca shaped
as in Fig. 29.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.39-0. 40; elytra length, 0. 35-0. 36.
Number measured, 10.
Material examined--Type and co-type, rake, Mt. Poi, 3000', Coll. E.
MjSberg, with termite attached, (BMNH). 1, Sarawak, 1°38" Ntd3° 3858
19 Jan. 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK): 1, same locality and
date, nest notes, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK); 2, same locality
and date, Coll. Wayne King, Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK); 7, same lo-
cality, 24 Jan. 1963, nest notes, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK);
12, Borneo, G. Kerihoen, 0°55' N, 113°50' E, 15 June 1932, Coll. Schuite-
maker, (FMNH, DK).
Kistner: A Revision of the tribe Feldini 9
Notes--The hosts of all of these specimens (except the Kerihoen speci-
mens) were determined to be Dicuspiditermes nemorosus (Haviland) by Alfred
Emerson. Specimens of the host termites with the exception of the type series
are to be found in the Emerson collection of the American Museum of Natural
History, New York. I made a photograph of the termite pinned under the type
specimen while I was in London and this photograph was also determined to be
D. nemorosus by Emerson.
Fig, 18-25. --Median lobes of male genitalia: 18, Felda eleanorae; 19, F. kingi; 20,
F. borneensis; Shaka setipes. Lateral lobes of wars genitalia: oe F. “eleanorae;
23, F. kingi; 24, F: . borneensis; 25, F. setipes.
Felda butteli (Wasmann)
Asticta butteli Wasmann 1916: 186, pl. 4&5, Fig. 13. Type: Naturhis-
torisch Museum, Maastricht, (Malaya, Selangor, Gap, Coll. von Buttel-Ree-
pen, 10 Mar. 1912, with Capritermes minor Holmgren).
10 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. , vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Felda butteli, Blackwelder 1952: 165, (changed generic name, as Asticta
is preocupied); Seevers 1957: 237 (further description, changed host record
to Capritermes nemorosus Haviland).
Distinguished from F. capritermitis by the absence of major setae on the
abdomen and its smooth pronotum.
Color light reddish brown throughout with the antennae and apices of the
legs a little lighter than the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pro-
notum, and elytra coriaceus, very feebly shining, with many punctures con-
taining setae scattered over all the surfaces. Tergites and paratergites of the
abdomen are deeply punctate, almost shagreened. Pronotum with the follow-
ing distribution of major setae, i. e. those which are longer than the shorter
setae: anterior border with 4; postero-lateral borders with 3 each; disc with
4, 1 to each side of the midline, and 1 in each lateral third near the middle.
The presence of the shorter setae makes the total pattern of setae rather dif-
ficult to interpret. Elytra with an even covering of fine relatively long yellow
setae. Abdominal tergites, paratergites, and sternites devoid of major setae
but covered with an even covering of relatively long yellow setae arranged in
thick bands evenly over their surfaces. Male genitalia and female spermathe-
ca unknown. :
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 35-0. 36; elytra length, 0. 33-0. 34.
Number measured, 2.
Material examined--Holotype and paratype (undissected), Malaya, Selan-
gor, Gap, Coll. H. von Buttel-Reepen, 10 Mar. 1912, ex nest 190, (NHM,
FMNH).
Notes--The termites from nest 190 were unavailable for study but it is
very unlikely that they are Dicuspiditermes minor (Holmgren) or D. nemoro-
sus (Haviland).
Felda capritermitis (Wasmann), new comb.
Disticta capritermitis Wasmann 1916, 185, pl. 4-5, Fig. 12, Type: Na-
turhistorisch Museum, Maastricht, (Sumatra, Tandjong Slamat, with Capri-
termes minor Holmgren).
Zunia capritermitis, Blackwelder 1952, 409, (changed generic name);
Seevers 1957, 237 (additional descriptive details).
Distinguished from F. butteli by the very distinct impressions on the pro-
notum.
Color light reddish brown throughout, with the head and elytra lighter than
the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum, and elytra smooth
and shiny without punctures. Pronotum with 2 distinct, deep fossae, 1 on
each side of midline. Pronotum with 4 major setae on the anterior border, 2
to each side of the midline and 2 about 1/4 width in from corners; posterolat-
eral border with 5 evenly spaced major setae; disc with 4 major setae, 2 on
each side of midline and 2 directly posterior to the anterolateral setae. Ely-
tra with about 15 yellow setae scattered evenly over their surfaces. Abdomi-
nal tergites with an apical row of setae but no major setae. Paratergites with
many small short yellow setae but no black setae. Male genitalia and sperm-
atheca unknown.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.32-0.34; elytra length, 0. 25-0. 26.
Number measured, 2.
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 11
Material examined--Only the type-series, (NHM, FMNH).
Notes--The host was originally determined as Capritermes minor Holm-
gren by Wasmann. These host specimens have not been reexamined but other
specimens of Dicuspiditermes have been examined from Sumatra and Malaya
and Emerson thinks that it is highly likely that Dicuspiditermes species B is
the true host. This is a probable new species of Dicuspiditermes that will be
described in the near future.
Fig. 26-30. --Spermathecae: 26, Felda eleanorae; 27, F. kingi; 28, F. asteria; 29,
F. borneénsig; 30, Fo. Setipes.. son, sae -_— 2 ee
Felda eleanorae, n. Sp.
Figures 18, 22, 26
Distinguished from F. Kingi to which it is most closely related by slight
differences in the chaetotaxy of the pronotum, its slightly larger size, as well
as differences in the shape of the male genitalia and the spermatheca.
Color dark reddish brown throughout with the legs and the antennae some-
what lighter than the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum,
and elytra smooth and shiny with no significant sculpture. Macrochaetotaxy
of pronotum as follows: Anterior border with 6 setae, 3 on each side of the
midline. Posterolateral border with 5 setae. Disc with 4 setae, 2 adjacent
to each side of the midline and 1 in each lateral third. Macrochaetotaxy of
abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: 0, 4, 4, 4, 4, 0, 4. Outer paratergites
III-VI with 1 macroseta each. Inner paratergites without any setae. Sternites
with irregular apical rows. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig.
18. Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 22. Spermatheca shaped
as in Fig. 26.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.33-0.36; elytra length, 0. 24-0. 30.
Number measured, 10.
Holotype--Male, No. 14102, Sarawak, 1°38'N, 113°35' E, 31 Jan. 1963,
nest notes, Coll. Eleanor Emerson, vial no. 3. In the collection of D. H.
Kistner.
Paratypes--Sarawak: 31, same data as holotype, (DK); 1, same locality,
19 Jan. 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK); 8, same locality, 9
Feb. 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, slit pore nest, (DK).
Notes--The host termites of the 1st 2 lots mentioned, were determined to
be Dicuspiditermes nemorosus (Haviland) while the host termites of the last
lot mentioned were determined to be D. rothi by A. Emerson. Host termites
are in the Emerson collection of the American Museum of Natural History,
New York. The species is named after the collector of the principle series,
12 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Eleanor, Emerson.
Felda kingi, n. sp.
Figures 4-13, 15-17, 19, 23, 27
Distinguished from F. eleanorae to which it is most closely related by a
difference in the chaetotaxy of the pronotum, its slightly smaller size, and
slight differences in the shape of the male genitalia and the female spermathe-
ca. 3
Color dark reddish brown throughout with the head and pronotum somewhat
lighter than the rest of the body and the legs lighter than that. Dorsal surface
of the head, pronotum, elytra, and sclerotized parts of the abdomen. smooth
and shiny. Macrochaetotaxy of pronotum as follows: Anterior border with 6
macrosetae, 3 on each side of the midline. Posterolateral border of pronotum
with 6 macrosetae. Disc with 6 macrosetae, 2 just to each side of the mid-
line and 1 on each lateral third. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-
VIII as follows: 0, 4, 4, 4, 4, 0, 2. Outer paratergites MI-VI with 1 macro-
seta each. Inner paratergites without macrosetae. Each sternite with an api-
cal row of macrosetae. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 19.
Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 23. Spermatheca shaped as
in Fig. 27.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 30-0. 32; elytra length, 0. 22-0. 26.
Number measured, 10.
Holotype--Male, No. 14103, Sarawak, 1°38'N, 113°35' E, 950', nest
notes, 11 Feb. 1963, Coll. W. King and Eleanor Emerson.
Paratypes--Sarawak: 22, same data as holotype, (DK); 6, same locality
as holotype, 18 Apr. 1963, Coll. W. King, (DK); 7, same data as previous
but different nest, (DK).
Notes--The termites of the 3 colonies from which these specimens came
were determined as Dicuspiditermes rothi by A. Emerson and are in the Em-
erson Collection of the American Museum of Natural History, New York. The
species is named after W. King, one of the collectors.
Felda setipes (Wasmann), new comb.
Figures 14, 25, 30
Termitobiella setipes Wasmann 1916: 187, pl. 4, Fig. 14, Type: Natur-
historish Museum, Maastricht, (Malaya, Selangor, Gap, with Capritermes
nemorosus Haviland, Coll. von Buttel-Reepen, 9 Mar. 1912, No. 197); See-
vers 1957: 238 (additional description).
Distinguished from F. eleanorae and F. kingi to which it is most closely
related by the chaetotaxy of the pronotum as well as the spermatheca and male
genitalia.
Color dark reddish brown throughout with the abdomen a little lighter than
the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum, and elytra smooth
and shiny with no other unusual sculpture. Macrochaetotaxy of pronotum as
follows: Anterior border with 4 setae. Posterolateral border with 4 setae on
each side. Disc with 6 setae, 2 very close to each side of the midline, and 1
in each lateral fifth. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows:
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 13
0, 4, 4, 4, 4, 0, 4. Only the 2 inner setae are long on tergite VIII. Outer
paratergites of III-VI with 1 seta each. Inner paratergites with no macrosetae.
Sternites III-VI with apical rows of macrosetae only. No macrosetae on ster-
nites VII and VIII. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 21. Lat-
eral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 25. Spermatheca shaped as in
Fig. 30. :
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 41-0. 43; elytra length, 0. 34-0. 36;
number measured, 5.
Material examined--1, undissected, Holotype, (NHM); 5, Malaya, Selan-
gor, Semangkok Forest Reserve, 8 mi. S. of the Gap, 3°34' N, 102°10' E,
14 Mar. 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK).
Notes--The termites with which these specimens were found were deter -
mined to be Dicuspiditermes sp. C by A. Emerson, specimens of which are
in the Emerson Collection of the American Museum of Natural History, New
York. After careful examination of the types of these species there does not
seem to be any adequate basis to separate the larger species of Felda from
the smaller species of Felda into separate genera. Should anyone in the fu-
ture think there is some other character, the name Termitobiella Wasmann
-~ would be available.
Genus Dicuspidoxenus, new genus
Most closely related to Felda from which it is distinguished by the very
large inner paratergites which are nearly half as wide as tergite IV or V. Al-
so the pronotum is more subquadrate and not immediately and evenly rounded
toward the posterior border from the sides as in Felda (compare Fig. 37 and
12.
Overall shape as in Fig. 2. Head capsule wider than long, shaped as in
Fig. 32, with no neck or nuchal ridge apparent. Eyes present and well de-
fined with many anteriorly and laterally directed facets, with most of the fa-
cets directed anteriorly. Antennae inserted between the eyes, very near to
and lateral to the anterior tentorial pits; 11-segmented, shaped as in Fig. 33.
Gula short, with sides slightly divergent posteriorly. Mentum and submentum
fused to each other and to the gula. Submentum broadly expanded anteriorly.
Mandibles slightly asymmetrical; shaped as in Fig. 31 and 34; both mandibles
with median teeth. Maxillae shaped as in Fig. 35; palpi 4-segmented. Max-
illary acetabulae not distinctly margined. Labium shaped as in Fig. 38; palpi
3-segmented. Labrum shaped as in Fig. 40.
Pronotum about 1/3 wider than long, shaped as in Fig. 37, subquadrate.
Prosternum short, evenly rounded between the legs, with anterolateral artic-
ulation processes of normal length. Mesothoracic peritremes membranous.
Elytra without distinction, shaped as in Fig. 36. Wings present, of normal
size, and with the usual staphylinid venation. Meso- and metanotum and scu-
tellum shaped as in Fig. 41. Note the extreme shortness of the metanotum.
Meso- and metasternum shaped as in Fig. 42 with the mesosternum about 1/2
the length of the metasternum. Mesosternal intercoxal process broadly
rounded between the widely separated mesocoxae. Mesocoxal acetabulae not
distinctly margined although there is some trace of a margin on the lateral
edge (note arrow in Fig. 42). Pro-, meso-, and metalegs shaped as in Fig.
47, 45, and 46, respectively; tarsal formula 4-5-5.
Abdomen not physogastric, shaped as in Fig. 2, 48, 50, and 56, but
broadly expanded with extremely wide inner paratergites comprising most of
14
Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 15
Fig. 41-44, --Dicuspidoxenus generic characters: D. krishnai: 41, meso- and metanotum
and scutellum; 42, meso- and metasternum; 44, female abdominal segment IX,
D. emersoni: 43, abdominal segment VIII and IX of male.
the increased width. Segment I represented only by the tergite fused to the
metanotum (Fig. 41). Segment II represented only by the tergite. Segments
III-VII represented by a tergite, 2 pairs of paratergites, and an extremely
large sternite each. Inner paratergites about 1/3 the width of the tergites and
about 3-3 1/2 times the width of outer paratergites. Dorsal rim of the abdo-
men formed between the outer paratergites and sternites. Tergite VII with 2
median openings to the tergal gland reservoir; 1 to each side of the midline.
Segment VIII greatly reduced in Size; shaped as in Fig. 43, represented by
tergite and sternite alone. Segment IX trilobed, shaped as in Fig. 43, anter-
ERAS cRNA SANT iP RSS Anke RL ea N 'P RA
Fig. 31-40. --Dicuspidoxenus generic characters: D. krishnai: 31, left mandible;
32, head capsule; 33, antenna; 34, right mandible; 35, maxilla; 36, elytron; 37,
pronotum; 38, labium; 39, wing; 40, labrum.
16 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
ior apodemes of male very conspicuous. Segment IX of male with the extra
sclerotized piece ventrally, probably representing the sternite IX. Male gen-
italia bulbous with median lobe variable in shape by species. Shape of lateral
lobe of male genitalia variable by species. Spermatheca sclerotized, shape
variable by species.
Type-species--Dicuspidoxenus emersoni n. sp.
Fig. 45-47. --Dicuspidoxenus generic characters: D. krishnai: 45, mesoleg; 46, metaleg;
47, proleg.
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF DICUSPIDOXENUS
1 Sternites III-VI with median thinly sclerotized white shagreened areas
eel AURORE CIOS DA GE SSS TUL OT ONG, D. krishnai (p. 19 )
Sternites III-VI of uniform sclerotization, with no white median areas
Eee ask caress bt Sek HEME Gibb te es.5 2 we PRN. WO con ene teat ERs WO RER Up gab NETS Sas Bie es a's 2
2 (1) Tergites III-VI with 4 macrochaetae on each..... D. emersoni (p. 16 )
Tergites IV, V, and VI with only 2 macrochaetae on each..........
ee ca as? 0, ees Bee Lew a): D. javanicus (p. 17 )
Dicuspidoxenus emersoni n. sp.
Figures 43, 48-50
Most closely related to D. krishnai from which it is distinguished by its
somewhat smaller size and different chaetotaxy.
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 17
Head, pronotum, and elytra dark reddish brown throughout. Abdomen
lighter reddish brown. Legs, antennae, and mouthparts still lighter yellow-
ish brown throughout. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum, elytra, and ab-
domen smooth and shiny with chaetotaxy as follows: Pronotum with a row of 8
setae along the anterior border and 3 along each lateral border of which the
most anterior is also part of the series of 8 across the anterior border. Pro-
notum with 2 median rows of 3 additional setae on the disc, and 1 additional
seta lateral to those on the disc. Posterior border of pronotum with 1 macro-
seta. Elytra with a lateral marginal row of 3 macrosetae and 4 other setae
scattered on the disc of which 1 row of 3 is just interior to the lateral border
and 1 toward the median border. Head with an even sparse covering of large
macrosetae. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: 0, 4,
4, 4, 4, 0, 4. Outer paratergites of segments II-VI with 1 macroseta each.
Inner paratergites without macrosetae. Sternites with a few setae scattered
over their surfaces; these few setae are more numerous on segment III than
the rest of the segments. Sternites III-VI without thinly sclerotized shagreen-
ed white median areas. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 50.
Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 51. Spermatheca shaped as
in Fig. 49.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 36-0. 38; elytra length, 0. 24-0. 25.
Number measured, 5.
Holotype--Male, #14098, Sarawak, 1°38' N, 113°35' E, 24 Jan. 1963,
nest notes, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson. In the collection of D. H.
Kistner.
Paratypes--Sarawak, 1°38' N, 113°35' E: 5, 19 Jan. 1963, nest notes,
Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK); 1, 25 Feb. 1963, nest notes, Coll.
Eleanor and Alfred Emerson, (DK).
Notes--All of the host specimens of this species were determined to be
Dicuspiditermes nemorosus (Haviland) by Alfred Emerson. Host termites are
in the Emerson Collection of the American Museum of Natural History, New
York. The species is named after both of the collectors.
Dicuspidoxenus javanicus n. sp.
Figures 56-59
Most closely related to D. emersoni from which it is distinguished by its
slightly larger size and its chaetotaxy.
Color light yellowish brown throughout with the head, pronotum, and ely-
tra just a slight bit darker than the abdomen and the appendages. Dorsal sur-
face of the head, pronotum, elytra, and abdomen smooth and shiny with chae-
totaxy as follows: Head witha sparse but even covering of macrosetae. Pro-
notum with 4 macrosetae on the anterior border, 2 on the lateral border, 2
rows of 3 on each side of the midline of which the first is on the anterior bor-
der and another seta lateral to that on the outer third of the disc. Elytra with
a sparse but even covering of fine yellow setae over the entire surface. Ma-
crochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VI as follows: 0, 0, 2, 2, 2, 0, 2.
Outer paratergites III-VI with 1 macroseta on each. Inner paratergites with-
out macrosetae. Sternite III with a group of 5-6 macrosetae in the median
area. Sternites IV through VII with 1 apical row of setae, 1 anti-apical row
of setae, and a few scattered in between. Sternites II-VI without thinly
sclerotized white shagreened median areas; evenly sclerotized throughout.
18 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Median lobeof male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 58. Lateral lobe of male gen-
italia shaped as in Fig. 59. Spermatheca shaped as in Fig. 57.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 46-0. 48; elytra length, 0. 34-0. 36.
Number measured, 3.
Holotype--Male, #14097, Java: Pondok Gedeh, 800 or so meters, August
1932, Coll. C. Franssen. In the collection of the Field Museum of Natural
History, Chicago.
Paratypes--2, same data as holotype, (FMNH, Dk).
Notes--The type series was marked as having been captured with Capri-
termes sp. which is the former name applied to species of Dicuspiditermes.
Fig. 48-55. --Dicuspidoxenus emersoni: 48, abdominal segments II-VII; 49, spermatheca;
00, median lobe of male genitalia; 51, lateral lobe of male genitalia. D. krishnai: 52, ab-
dominal segments II-VII; 53, spermatheca; 54, median lobe of male genitalia; 55, lateral
lobe of male genitalia.
‘Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 19
Dicuspidoxenus krishnai, n. sp.
Figures 31-42, 44-47, 52-55
The most distinctive species of the genus. Distinguished from both D.
emersoni and D. javanicus by the presence of weakly sclerotized areas in the
middle of sternites III-VI. These areas are shagreened, very thinly sclero-
tized, and white.
Head, pronotum, and elytra dark reddish brown throughout. Abdomen,
Fig. 56-59. --Dicuspidoxenus javanicus: 56, abdominal segments II-VIII; 57, spermatheca;
58, median lobe of male genitalia; 59, latera] lobe of male genitalia.
legs, and mouthparts light yellowish brown throughout. Dorsal surface of the
head, pronotum, elytra, and abdomen smooth and shiny with the following
chaetotaxy: Head with a sparse covering of macrosetae scattered evenly over
its surface. Pronotum with a row of 8 macrosetae along the anterior border,
3 along the lateral border which includes 1 of the anterior border, 2 median
rows of 3 each on each side of the midline not counting the 1 on the anterior
border, and 1 macrosetae on each outer third of the pronotum lateral to that
row. Elytra each witha lateral row of 3 macrosetae, an interior row just
medial to that with another 3 macrosetae and 1 macroseta on each side of the
scutellum. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: 2, 4,
4, 4, 4, 0, 4. Outer paratergites of segments II-VI each with 1 macroseta
each. Inner paratergites without macrosetae. Sternites II-VI with setae
scattered over their surfaces but not in any regular sort of sequence. Ster-
nite III with a median set of thickly bunched black setae. Median lobe of male
genitalia shaped as in Fig. 54. Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in
Fig. 55. Spermatheca shaped as in Fig. 53.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 39-0. 41; elytra length, 0. 26-0. 30.
Number measured, 9.
20 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Holotype--Male, #14099, Malaya, Sungei Buloh forest reserve, 3° 10'N,
101° 34' E, 150 ft., 18 March 1963, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson. In
the collection of D. H. Kistner.
Paratypes--8, same data as holotype, (DK).
Notes--The host colony was determined as Dicuspiditermes sp. A by
Alfred E. Emerson. Specimens of the host colony are in the Emerson collec-
tion of the American Museum of Natural History, New York. The species is
named after Kumar Krishna.
Genus Tekalita, new genus
The most distinctive genus of the tribe. Not closely related to any of the
other genera, perhaps closest to Felda Blackwelder but easily distinguished
from it by the shape of the pronotum as well as the abdomen.
Overall shape as in Fig. 3. Head capsule about as long as wide with the
anterior edge of the clypeus somewhat membranous, shaped as in Fig. 3.
Head capsule narrowed behind the eyes but without a distinct neck or distant
nuchal ridge. Eyes well developed with many laterally and anteriorly direct-
ed facets. Antennae inserted between the eyes and the insertion of the an-
terior arms of the tentorium; 11-segmented, shaped as in Fig. 63. Gula rel-
atively short and narrow with the sides relatively straight to the posterior
border. Gula, mentum, and submentum fused together. Submentum broadly
expanded anteriorly. Mandibles asymmetrical, shaped as in Figs. 68, 69,
70, and 71; both mandibles with median teeth but the median teeth have differ-
ent shapes on each of the mandibles. Maxillae shaped as in Fig. 62; palpi 4-
segmented Maxillary acetabullae without distinct margins. Labium shaped
as in Fig. 60; palpi 3-segmented. Labrum shaped as in Fig. 61.
Pronotum strongly campanulate (inverted) with 2 prominent lateral protu-
berances, shaped as in Fig. 74 and 76. Anterior border strongly sinuate with
2 impressions to each side of the central disc, between that and the lateral
protuberances. The extent and shape of these prontal impressions vary by
Species. Pronotum strongly constricted in the middle and proceeding to the
evenly rounded posterior border; shaped as in Fig. 74 and 76. Prosternum
evenly rounded between the legs and with anterior apodemes normally shaped.
Procoxal cavities closed behind by membrane in which are embedded the very
small straplike mesothoracic peritremes. Meso- and metanotum shaped as
in Fig. 66. Mesosternum about 1/2 the length of the metasternum; evenly
rounded between the mesothoracic coxal cavities. Mesocoxae widely sepa-
rated. Metasternum with only a hint of impressions where the mesocoxae
rub up against it. Wings present, of normal size, and with usual staphylinid
venation. Elytra without distinction, shaped as in Fig. 65. Meso- and meta-
notum shaped as in Fig. 66. Pro-, meso-, and metalegs, shaped as in Fig.
79, 80, and 81 respectively. Tarsal formula 4-5-5.
Abdomen physogastric, shaped as in Fig. 82 and 83. Segment I repre-
sented only by the tergite fused to the metanotum (Fig. 66). Segment II re-
presented only by a tergite. Segments II-VI with 1 tergite, 1 sternite, and
2 pairs of paratergites each. Segment VII with 1 tergite, 1 sternite, and 1
pair of paratergites. Segment VIII represented by a sternite and tergite only.
Inner paratergites a little less than twice the width of the outer paratergites
when 2 pairs are present. Dorsal rim of the abdomen formed by 2 pairs of
paratergites working in conjunction with each other. Tergite VII with the 2
minute openings of the tergal gland located medially, 1 on each side of the
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 21
midline. Segment IX trilobed, shaped as in Fig. 77 and 78, anterior apo-
demes of male very conspicuous. Spermatheca scloerotized, shape variable
by species. Median lobe of male genitalia large and bulbous, shape variable
by species. Shape of lateral lobe of male genitalia variable by species.
Type-species--Teékalita nemorosus, n. sp. |
Notes--The genus is named after the locality of T. nemorosus called
Nanga Tekalit. The gender is masculine.
Fig. 60-67. --Tekalita generic characters: T. nemorosus: 60, labium; 61, labrum;
62, maxilla; 63, antenna; 64, wing; 65, elytron; 66, meso- and metanotum; 67, ab-
dominal segment VIII.
22 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Fig. 68-78, --Tekalita generic characters: T. borneensis: 68, right mandible; 69, left
mandible; 72, meso- and metasternum; 76, pronotum. T. nemorosus: 10, left mandible,
71, right mandible; 73, meso- and metasternum; 74, pronotum; 75, abdominal segment VII;
77, abdominal segment IX of male; 78, abdominal segment IX of female.
KEY TO SPECIES OF TEKALITA
Abdomen with clearly defined distinct macrochaetotaxy .........csceeeee
. nemorosus (p. 23 )
. borneensis (p. _)
Abdomen without clearly defined large setae..........
Tae Lae
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 23
Tekalita borneensis, n. Sp.
Figures 68, 69, 72, 76, 83-85, 89
Distinguished from T. nemorosus through the absence of distinct chaeto-
taxy on the abdomen.
Color light yellowish brown throughout with the elytra a little darker than
the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum and elytra smooth
and shiny with no particularly distinctive sculpture. Pronotum with very,
very shallow lateral indentations (Fig. 76). Head without notable macro-
chaetotaxy. Pronotum with a row of 6 macrochaetae on the anterior border
and a row of 3 macrosetae on the lateral border of which the middle seta ac-
tually arises from the reflexed hypomera but is visible on the lateral border.
Posterior border with 1 macroseta. Disc with 1 seta on each side of the mid-
line near the middle with another seta between that middle 1 and the most lat-
eral of the anterior setae on each side. Elytra with an even covering of long
yellow setae. Abdominal tergites II-III without clearly defined setae. Medi-
an lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 84. Lateral lobe of male genitalia
shaped as in Fig. 85. Spermatheca shaped as in Fig. 89.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 31-0.33; elytra length, 0. 23-0. 25;
pronotum width, 0.36-0.39. Number measured, 6.
Holotype--Male, #14100, Borneo, G. Kerihoen, 15 June 1932. In the col-
lection of the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
Paratypes--11, same data as holotype, (FMNH, DK).
Notes--The host of this species is presently unknown. G. Kerihoen is in
the Mtiller mountains.
Tekalita nemorosus, n. Sp.
Figures 60-67, 70, 71, 73-75, 77-82, 86-88
A highly distinctive species which is distinguished from T. borneensis by
the presence of distinctive and large black setae on the abdomen.
All sclerotized parts reddish brown throughout with the elytra and head
somewhat darker than the rest of the body. Dorsal surface of the head, pro-
notum, elytra and abdomen smooth and shiny with no noticeable punctures,
Pronotum with distinctive indentations in the anterior border between the lat-
eral protuberances and the median disc, shaped as in Fig. 74. Head with an
irregular group of 6-8 setae with clear insertions on the posterior median
portion, Pronotum with a group of 3 setae on each side of the midline of the
anterior border very close to the lateral edge on the protuberance. Pronotum
also with a group of 4 macrosetae on the lateral border, 2 of which are on the
very side, and 2 of which a little bit interior to that of the lateral protuber-
ance and 1 macrosetae closer to the posterior border. Pronotum also with a
group of 6 macrosetae arranged in 2 rows of 3 each on either side of the mid-
line on the disk. The middle setae in each of the rows are much shorter than
the other two if present at all. Sometimes they are absent. Macrochaetotaxy
of abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: 0, 8, 8, 8, 8, 0, 6. Paratergites
with no large macrosetae but with some smaller thinner setae. Sternites III-
vul with an apical and antiapical rows of black setae. Sternite VIII with an
irregular group of macrosetae. Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in
Fig. 87. Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 86. Spermatheca
24 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
shaped as in Fig. 88.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.34-0.36; pronotum width, 0. 39-0. 42;
elytra length, 0.23-0.25. Number measured, 15.
Holotype--Male, #14101, Sarawak, 1° 38' N, 113°35' E, 24 Jan. 1963,
nest notes, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson. In the collection of D. H.
Kistner.
Paratypes--Sarawak, 1° 38' N, 113°35' E, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Em-
erson: 6, 19 Jan. 1963, (DK); 3, 19 Jan. 1963, nest notes, (DK); 2, 22 Jan.
1963, nest notes, (DK); 21, 25 Jan. 1963, vial number 3, (DK); 15, 25 Jan.
1963, vial number 2, rain shedding nest, (DK); 1, 22 Jan. 1963, (DK); 1, 7
Apr. 1963, Coll. W. King, (DK). 3
Notes--The host specimens of all of the above were determined to be Di-
cuspiditermes nemorosus (Haviland) by Emerson and are in the Emerson col-
lection of the American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Fig. 79-81, --Tekalita generic characters: T. nemorosus: 179, proleg; 80, mesoleg;
81, metaleg.
Genus Dicuspiphilus, new genus
Most closely related to Felda from which it is distinguished by the mem-
branous condition of the paratergites on abdominal segments IV-VI. Also
distinguished from Felda by the more elongate labrum and the extensive de-
velopment of membrane between the tergites and the sternites.
Overall shape as in Fig. 90, 91, and 92. Head capsule about as wide as
long, shaped as in Fig. 90, with no neck or nuchal ridge present. Eyes pre-
sent and well developed with many anteriorly and laterally directed facets, al-
though most of the facets are directed anteriorly. Antennae inserted between
the eyes very near and lateral to the anterior tentorial pits; 11-segmented,
shaped as in Fig. 93. Gula a little more than half the length of the head, with
the sides slightly divergent posteriorly. Both mentum and submentum fused
to the gula and fused to each other. Submentum broadly expanded anteriorly.
Mandibles only slightly asymmetrical, shaped as in Fig. 96 and 98; both
mandibles with median teeth, but the right mandible has what appears to be
an accessory tooth just anterior to the strong median tooth. Maxillae shaped
as in Fig. 94; palpi 4-segmented. Maxillary acetabulae not distinctly mar-
gined. Labium shaped as in Fig. 97; palpi 3-segmented. Labrum elongate,
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 25
shaped as in Fig. 95.
Fig. 82-89, --Tekalita borneensis: 83, abdominal segments II-IX; 84, medial lobe of male
genitalia; 85, lateral lobe of male genitalia: 89, spermatheca. T. nemorosus: 82, abdom-
inal segments II-VII; 86, lateral lobe of male genitalia; 87, median lobe of male genitalia;
88, spermatheca.
Pronotum about twice as wide as long, shaped as in Fig. 101. Prostern-
um short, evenly rounded between the legs, with anterolateral articulation
processes of normal length. Procoxal cavities closed behind by membrane in
which are located the very small and membranous mesothoracic peritremes.
Elytra without distinction, shaped as in Fig. 103. Wings present, of normal
Size, with the usual staphylinid venation, shaped as in Fig. 102. Meso-, and
metanotum, and scutellum shaped as in Fig. 99. Note the extreme shortness
of the metanotum. Meso- and metasternum shaped as in Fig. 100, with the
mesosternum about half the length of the metasternum. Mesosternal inter-
coxal process broadly rounded between the widely separated mesocoxae. Me-
socoxal acetabulae only indistinctly margined on the posterolateral border
26 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
(note arrow in Fig. 100). Pro-, meso-, and metalegs shaped as in Fig. 109,
107, and 108 respectively; tarsal formula 4-5-5.
Fig. 90-92. --Dicuspiphilus multiseta: 90, dorsal view; 91, lateral view; 92, dorsal view of
stenogastric individual.
Abdomen physogastric, shaped as in Fig. 90, 91, and 106; most easily
seen in Fig. 106 where arrows mark parts of a cleared abdomen. Segment I
represented only by the tergite fused to the metanotum (Fig. 99). Segment II
represented only by the tergite. Segment II witha tergite, sternite, and 2
pairs of paratergites of which only the inner paratergite is distinctly sclero-
tized. Segments IV, V, VI, each witha tergite, a sternite, and 2 pairs of
paratergites, but the paratergites are reduced to membranous vestiges of the
normally sclerotized paratergites. Segment VII with a tergite and a sternite
and only 1 pair of membranous paratergites. Arrows on Fig. 106 indicate the
inner and outer paratergites. Inner paratergites about 5 times the width of
the outers. Segment VII with tergite and sternite only. Tergite VII with 2
small openings of the tergal glands on the anterior borders on each side of the
midline. Abdomen is normally fairly well rounded in life so there is no real
rim on the dorsal edge of the abdomen. Segment IX trilobed, shaped as in
Fig. 104, and 105, with the anterior apodemes of the male segments IX very
conspicuous (Fig. 104). Segment IX of male with extra sclerotized piece
ventrally, probably representing sternite IX. Male genitalia bulbous, with
median and lateral lobes both variable in shape by species. Spermatheca
sclerotized shape variable by species.
Type-species--Dicuspiphilus orientis, n. sp.
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 27
Fig. 93-98, --Dicuspiphilus generic characters: D. multiseta: 93, antenna; 94, maxilla;
95, labrum; 96, left mandible; 97, labium; 98, right mandible.
KEY TO SPECIES OF DICUSPIPHILUS
1 Pronotum with 2 clear impressions on disk, 1 on each side of the
midline, ac ~ehewn in Migs 00 and? o, 850 ae OPT Oe. 2
Pronotum without such indentations............D. platycollis (p. 31)
2 (1) Pronotum with 2 very small setae between each large seta on the an-
terior and lateral:bordersiinia ao. eoee. YOO TOD. omientia-(p. 27)
Pronotum with 3-5 short setae between each long seta .............
iS. mivth Lee aa eS Below RIS tag4 ee, DJ mtisete thee)
Dicuspiphilus orientis, n. sp.
Figures 110, 112, 114
Most closely related to D. platycollis from which it is distinguished by
28 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
the presence of pronotal grooves.
Fig. 99-105. --Dicuspiphilus generic characters: D. multiseta: 99, meso- and metanotum
and scutellum; 100, meso- and metasternum; 101, pronotum; 102, wing; 103, elytron;
104, abdominal segment IX of male; 105, abdominal segment IX of female.
Head, pronotum and elytra dark reddish brown throughout, head a little
lighter in color than the pronotum and elytra. Abdomen lighter reddish brown
except for the extensively developed membrane which is white. Dorsal sur-
face of the head, pronotum, elytra, and abdomen smooth and shiny with chae-
totaxy as follows: Pronotum with a row of 4 macrosetae along the anterior
border and a row of 4 macrosetae along the posterolateral border. Each of
the macrosetae has 2 shorter seta between them. Pronotum with 4 setae on
the disc in line with 1 on the anterior border and 1 on the posterior border.
Pronotum also with 1 seta on the outer third of the disc. Macrochaetotaxy of
abdominal tergites II-VIII as follows: II, 1 row, II-VI, 3 rows each, VI, 2
rows, VIII, 2 rows. Sternites with a few setae scattered over their surfaces.
Median lobe of male genitalia shaped as in Fig. 110. Lateral lobe of male
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 29
genitalia shaped as in Fig. 112. Spermatheca shaped as in Fig. 114.
Fig. 106-109. --Dicuspiphilus generic characters: D. multiseta: 106, dorsolateral view of
abdominal segments II-VII; 107, mesoleg, 108, metaleg; 109, proleg.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.34-0.36; elytra length, 0. 26-0. 29.
Number measured, 7.
Holotype--Male, No. 14104, Sarawak, 1° 38'N, 113°35' E, 31 Jan. 1963,
nest notes, Coll. Eleanor Emerson, vial no. 3. In the collection of D. H.
Kistner,
Paratypes--13, same data as holotype, (DK).
Notes--The host termite was determined to be Dicuspiditermes nemoro-
sus (Haviland) by A. Emerson, specimens of which are in the Emerson col-
lection of the American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Dicuspiphilus multiseta, n. sp.
Figures 90-109, 111, 113, 115
Closely related to D. orientis from which it is distinguished by the pre-
sence of many setae between the macrosetae of the pronotum, as well as only
2 rows of macrosetae on abdominal tergite III.
30 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Color reddish brown throughout with the head and legs somewhat lighter
than the pronotum and elytra. Abdomen reddish brown except for the exten-
sive membranes which are whitish. Dorsal surface of the head, pronotum,
and elytra smooth and shiny with chaetotaxy as follows: Pronotum with a row
of setae on the anterior border each of which has numerous small yellow se-
tae between them. Posterolateral border with 8 setae scattered around them
at regular intervals; with numerous setae between the large macrosetae.
Disc with a row of 2 setae to each side of the midline and with 2 more setae
in each lateral third of the pronotum. Abdominal macrochaetotaxy as follows:
Tergite II with no macrosetae, tergite III with 2 rows of macrosetae, tergite
IV-VI with 3 rows of macrosetae, and tergites VII and VIII with 2 rows of
macrosetae. Sternites with an apical row of setae. Remnants of parater-
gites with numerous very short setae on the surfaces. Median lobe of male
genitalia shaped as in Fig. 111. Lateral lobe of male genitalia shaped as in
Fig. 113. Spermatheca shaped as in Fig. 115.
Fig. 110-116. --Dicuspiphilus orientis: 110, median lobe of male genitalia; 112, lateral
lobe of male genitalia; 114, spermatheca. D. multiseta: 111, median lobe of male gen-
choi 113, lateral lobe of male genitalia; 115, spermatheca. D. platycollis: 116, sperm-
atheca. “
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0.32-0.35, elytra length, 0. 29-0. 30.
Number measured, 7.
Holotype-- Male, No. 14105, Sarawak, 1° 38' N, 113° 35' E, 950 ft. ,
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 31
nest notes, 11 Feb. 1963, Coll. W. King and Eleanor Emerson. In the col-
lection of D. H. Kistner.
Paratypes--6, same data as holotype, (DK).
Notes--The host termites were determined to be Dicuspiditermes rothi
(Holmgren) by Emerson, specimens of which are in the Emerson collection
of the American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Dicuspiphilus platycollis, n. sp.
Figure 116
Distinguished from all other species by the very flat pronotum which has
no dorsal indentations on each side of the midline. |
Color dark reddish brown throughout with the head somewhat lighter than
the rest of the body. Abdominal tergites a little lighter than the pronotum
and elytra. Membranes between the tergites white. Dorsal surface of head,
pronotum, and elytra smooth and shiny. Pronotum without lateral indenta-
tions on the sides. Macrochaetotaxy of pronotum as follows: Pronotum with
a row of 8 macrosetae across the anterior border and a row of 16 on each
posterolateral border. Disc of pronotum with a row of 2 macrosetae on each
side of the midline and a single macroseta on the lateral third. Macrosetae
with many other shorter setae between them. Tergite II with 2 rows of ma-
crosetae. Tergite III-VI with 3 rows of macrosetae. Tergite VII with 4 rows
and tergite VIII with 3 rows of macrosetae. Sternites with irregular setae
scattered over them. Male unknown. Female spermatheca shaped as in Fig.
116.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 40- 0. 44; elytra length, 0. 30-0. 31.
Number measured, 2.
Holotype--Female, No. 14106, Sarawak, 1° 38'N, 113°35' E, 19 Jan.
1963, nest notes, Coll. Alfred and Eleanor Emerson. In the collection of
D. H. Kistner.
Paratype--1, Female, same locality as holotype, 19 Jan. 1963, Coll.
Wayne King, Alfred and Eleanor Emerson, (DK).
Notes--The termites host were determined to be Dicuspiditermes nem-
orosus (Haviland) by Emerson, specimens of which are in the Emerson col-
lection of the American Museum of Natural History, New York.
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES
AND HOST RELATIONSHIPS
The relationships between all of the species in this study were analyzed
numerically using methods of character coding and data processing described
many times previously (Kistner 1968). The only difference here is that we
now have a larger and faster computer (CD 3150). In brief, a character cod-
ed 1 is present while a character coded 0 is absent. Characters coded 3 in
this study result from fundamental differences in the setae patterns on the
abdomens. If character 27 is coded 1 meaning that there are multiple rows
of setae then characters 28-37 are coded 3 because these deal with types of
setae patterns which assume only 1 row is present. Characters 38-40 which
define the number of rows of setae on certain abdominal segments are mean-
32 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
ingless if there is only 1 row so species having but 1 row are therefore coded
3 in these also. The characters used in this study are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Characters used for numerical analysis.
Head capsule approximately oval
Gula with straight sides
Right mandible with an accessory tooth
Labrum length short as in Fig. 7, 40, and 61
Pronotum twice as wide as long
Pronotum 1/3 longer than wide
Posterolateral border of pronotum without a hind angle
Abdominal segment VII with 1 pair of paratergites only
Inner paratergites of segments III-VI 4 times the width of the outers
10. Inner paratergites of segments III-VI 3 times or less the width of the outers
11. Pronotum with 2 deep fossae on disk
12. Physogastric abdomen
13. Paratergites membranous
14. Sternites II-VI with a thinly sclerotized median area
15. Dorsal rim of abdomen between the outer paratergites and sternites
16. Pronotum with 4 major setae on the anterior border
17. Pronotum with 6 major setae on the anterior border
18. Pronotal disk with 4 major setae
19. Pronotal disk with 6 major setae
20. Pronotal disk with 8 major setae
21. Pronotal disk with 2 major setae
22. Posterolateral border of pronotum with 5 major setae
23. Posterolateral border of pronotum with 3 major setae
24. Posterolateral border of pronotum with 6 major setae
25. Posterolateral border of pronotum with 4 major setae
26. Posterolateral border of pronotum with 8 major setae
27. Abdominal tergites II-VI with multiple rows of setae
28. Abdominal tergite II with 2 major setae
29. Abdominal tergite III with 4 major setae
30. Abdominal tergite III with no major setae
31. Abdominal tergites IV, V, and VI with no major setae
32. Abdominal tergites IV, V, and VI with 2 major setae
33. Abdominal tergites IV, V, and VI with 4 major setae
34. Abdominal tergites IV, V, and VI with 6 major setae
35. Abdominal tergite VII with no major setae
36. Abdominal tergite VIII with 2 major setae
37. Abdominal tergite VIII with 4 major setae
38, Abdominal tergite II with 1 row of setae
39. Abdominal tergite II with 2 rows of setae
40. Abdominal tergite III with 2 rows of setae
41, Abdominal tergite VII with 2 rows of setae
42. Abdominal tergite VIII with 1 row of setae
43. Outer paratergites with 1 seta on each
OD Ty oo
The results of coding the 43 characters for the 15 species of the Feldini
are given in Table 2. These were then run through the computer with a pro-
gram to develop similarity coefficients and to cluster the species following
the methods given by Sokal and Sneath (1963). The first matrix of similarity
coefficients is presented in Table 3. The value of the first matrix is that the
coefficient multiplied by 100 represents the percentage of countable charac-
ters (ie. those coded 1 or 0) that the species have in common.
The dendrogram given in Fig. 117 presents the dendrogram which results
from clustering the species. The cluster values are only given for the points
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 33
at which the various groups join. There are no surprises here. The rela-
tionships of the genera are what one would expect using traditional criteria,
with Felda representing the most generalized genus and Dicuspiphilus the
most advanced. Both Tekalita and Dicuspidoxenus are obviously derived
from Felda and more closely related to it than to Dicuspiphilus.
Table 2. Character matrix of 15 species of the Feldini. Characters are arranged
sequentially from left to right.
1 Felda borneensis 1111101119010001010001000001100001001333011
2 F. butteli 1111101110010001010000100000011000100333010
3 F. asteria 1111101110010001010000100000100001001333011
4 F. capritermitis 1111101110110001010001000000011000100333010
. F. eleanorae 1111101110010000101001000000100010010333011
6 F. kingi 1111191110010000110000010000100010001333011
7 F. setipes 1111101110010001001000001000100010001333011
8 Dicuspidoxenus emersoni 1011010001000010000100100000100010001333011
9 D. javanicus 1011010001000011000010000000010100010333011
10 D. krishnai 1011010001000110001000100001100010001333011
11 Tekalita nemorosus 0101001101010000100000001000000000000333010
12 T. borneensis 0101001101010000110000001000011000100333010
13 Dicuspiphilus platycollis 0000101100011030001000000013333333333010000
14 D. orientis 0000101100111031001000001013333333333100100
15 D. multiseta 0000101100111031000100000113333333333001100
Table 3. First matrix of coefficients of relationships for the species of the tribe Feldini
SPECIES NUMBER
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 .750 .925 .775 .775 .825 .825 .575 .525 .575 .625 .575 .552 .483 .483
2 1,000 .825 .925 .675 .725 .725 .525 .575 .475 .675 .775 .586 .517 517
3 1.000 .750 .750 .850 .850 .650 .550 .600 .650 .600 .552 .483 .483
rm 4 1.000 .700 .700 .700 .450 .550 .400 .650 .750 .552 .552 .552
a5 1.000 .850 .850 .600 .550 .600 .700 .600 .621 .483 .414
S 6 1.000 .850 .650 .500 .600 .700 .650 .552 .414 .414
=a 1.000 .650 .550 .650 .700 .600 .621 .621 .483
2 1.000 .750 .900 .600 .500 .448 .310 .379
fl 9 1.000 .700 .600 .550 .448 .379 .379
510 1.000 .550 .450 .483 .345 .276
al 1.000 .900 .655 .586 .517
A412 1.000 .621 .552 .483
13 1.000 .813 .750
14 1.000 .813
A summary of the host relationships is given in Table 4. Nearly all of the
species, except F. eleanorae, are host specific. This exception is found with
Dicuspiditermes rothi in addition to D. nemorosus which has been interpreted
as its regular host. This exceptional host record is based on 8 specimens
taken from 1 nest while the usual host is based on 32 specimens taken from 2
nests. It remains to be seen what the preferred host will prove to be.
Since 4 feldine genera and 13 species of known hosts have evolved during
the time that Dicuspiditermes has evolved 5 species, it stands to reason that
the rates of evolution have not been the same. It doesn't even necessarily
follow that the rates of evolution are proportional. However, an examination
34 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
of the dendrogram in Fig. 117 is still instructive. One will note that where-
ever species of the same genus are found with both D. nemorosus and D. rothi
they are equally or more closely related to each other than to species found
with other termites. One would expect this because D. rothi was formerly
thought to be a subspecies of D. nemorosus and they must therefore be very
similar. However to pursue this any further when Dicuspiditermes sp. A, B,
and C have not even been described yet would be both hazardous and prema-
ture.
Table 4. Host Relationships of the Feldini
Termite Host Species of Feldini
Dicuspiditermes nemorosus (Haviland) Felda borneensis
F. -eleanorae
Dicuspidoxenus emersoni
Tekalita nemorosus
Dicuspiphilus orientis
Dicuspiphilus platycollis
D. rothi (Holmgren) Felda kingi |
F, eleanorae (?)
Dicuspiphilus multiseta
Dicuspidoxenus krishnai
Felda capritermitis
asteria
setipes
F,
F.
Kistner: A Revision of the Tribe Feldini 35
7 setipes
.850
5 eleanorae
£850
819
6 kingi
| borneensis Felda
925
4 : asteria
3
2 bufteli
4
) 925
BES capritermitis
Tekalita
54 12 borneensis
9 javanicus
125 8 emersoni Dicuspidoxenus
459 900
10 krishnai
13 platycollis
813
781 14 orientis
Dicuspiphilus
ro it’ label q
|
,
15 multiseta
Fig. 117. --Dendrogram of the relationships of the genera and species of the tribe Feldini.
LITERATURE CITED
Blackwelder, Richard E. 1952. The generic names of the beetle family
Staphylinidae. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. 200: IV + 484 p.
Cameron, Malcolm. 1943. New species of Staphylinidae (Col. ) from Borneo.
Entomol. Monthly Mag. 79: 139-143.
Kistner, David H. 1968. A taxonomic revision of the termitophilous tribe
Termitopaedini, with notes on behavior, systematics, and post-imaginal
growth (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Amer.
6(3): 142-196.
Seevers, Charles H. 1957. A monograph on the termitophilous Staphylinidae
(Coleoptera). Fieldiana: Zool, 40: 1-334,
Sokal, R. R. and P. H. A. Sneath. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy.
Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 360 p.
Wasmann, Erich. 1916. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse einer Forschungs-
reise nach Ostindien, V, Termitophile und Myrmekophile Coleopteren,
gesammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr. V. Buttel-Reepen, 1911-12. Zool. Jahrb.
System. 39: 169-210, pls 4-5.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT....... teeny ross S GaAs eset 37
INFRODUCTIOND: Pre Ca mrsrenrere Se eee ed 37
METHODS AND STA PERE ein cb th kee ce eee be oh dae ee 3 ole 38
Pere Le a eke Oe tere okra 2 Sattece tee Saw Sualele KES we 6 4» Reade wos gee oe 41
KEY TO GENERA OF THE DORYLOCERUS COMPLEX,............ 43
Redescription of the genus, Draconula. 3... ks en aie ols be ee ee le 43
Bee Cease es Oi rire a es ala nig rca israindicncdsosmicaneiancdy: view WS Pa wee 44
eneonils: CGC El iiaicy, 228 5 cuwvaitieuctinwic 5 90:4 b0.0 Oh ee Boies 8 Be 44
Genus Dorylocerus. Hiei. iiie we ee eee cece c ese sence eaeeceweeee 45
Key to species groups of DoryloCerus. ...... cece cere scence cvees 45
Dervlocerus Koll Group... waa eo ve + + © erhemoins ee hb oe oee anes 46
Dorylocerus fossulatus group. ........cccccceccessovecesvans 46
Dorylocerus excisicollis group. ...... cece eee e cece e ee cee eevee 46
De GIOCETUS Cake Ole Wc Seiya pie Fd vie = wlie c bie bin ae Ve OEE Ne Wee 47
DoryloCeruS MiNOL..... cece cece reser cere crc cececrecececces 47
Dorylocerus congolensiS ZrOUP......... eee eeeec reece eee reeee 47
DoryloceruS CONgOlENSIS. ..... eee cere cere cee reer eeceeces 47
DorylocerusS coStata ZTOUP....... cece cece eee e erence ccccees 47
Dorylocerus Costata..... cece cee c esc c esr ec sree receececeees 48
Dorylocerus fletcheri,..... ccc cece seecce rc crecccccrccveccecs 48
Rodylopora attenuata... ... cece creer c reser cece re cccccecccees 48
BIOLOGY-OF THE COMPLE Accs Sl sees eo aldo neld SR eal Fle UL 48
AGKNOW LIS DGEIMIEN Tre ci Fc aed BT a ST, Re oo Se area ane didlis « 51
37
THE REORGANIZATION OF THE DORYLOCERUS COMPLEX BY THE
USE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS WITH SOME NEW
DISTRIBUTION RECORDS AND NEW DATA ON THEIR
BEHAVIOR (COLEOPTERA, STAPHYLINIDAE)!
By
John L. Baker”
and
David H. Kistner®
ABSTRACT
The Dorylocerus complex is herewith reorganized and the generic name
Dorylopora synonymized. A new key to the genera of the Dorylocerus com-
plex is provided with the newly included Dorylobius Raffray. The genus Dra-
conula is redescribed and a new species D. decellei (Zaire) included. A new
species, Dorylocerus carinata (Zambia), is described. The species groups
of Dorylocerus are reorganized following results of numerical analyses. The
food habits and social biology of the Dorylocerus is reviewed and evolutionary
trends are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
The tribe Deremini is 1 of the most difficult tribes of the Aleocharinae.
All of the species are small and it has been difficult to establish generic lim-
its and definitions within the various groups. The first revisions of parts of
the tribe (Kistner 1966, 1968a) which were the first revisions ever attempted,
cut out what were thought to be the most distinctive and closely related genera
and combined them into what was then called the Dorylopora complex. This
complex contained the genera Dorylopora Wasmann, Dorylocerus Wasmann,
Rodylopora Kistner, Draconula Kistner, and Fossulopora Kistner. In order
to be included in the Dorylopora complex, species needed to have longitudinal
erooves or furrows in the head, pronotum, and elytra collectively. That ar-
rangement of the species in the genera is shown in Table 1.
Since those revisions, numerous new specimens of the complex have been
1This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Science
Foundation (Grant GB-28661X). Part of this paper was derived from a thesis
for the Degree of Master of Arts in Biological Sciences at California State
University at Chico by the senior author.
Present address: Division of Biological Control, University of Califor-
nia, Riverside.
3Shinner Institute for the Study of Interrelated Insects, Dept. of Biology,
California State University at Chico.
38 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Table 1. Organization of the Dorylopora Complex (after Kistner)
Species Species | Species group
number (if defined)
Dorylopora costata Wasmann
Dorylopora fletcheri Kistner
Dorylopora pseudocostata Kistner
Dorylopora afer Kistner |
Dorylopora kohli Wasmann
Dorylopora morio Kistner
Dorylopora nigra Kistner
Dorylopora abdominalis Cameron
Dorylopora carlislei Kistner
Dorylopora congolensis Kistner
Dorylopora ivoiriensis Kistner
Dorylopora excisicollis Cameron
Dorylopora solea Kistner
Dorylopora alzadae Kistner
Dorylopora kalongeana Kistner
Dorylopora minor Eichelbaum
Dorylocerus fossulatus Wasmann
Rodylopora attenuata Kistner
Fossulopora camerounicus Kistner
Fossulopora congoensis Kistner
Fossulopora orientalis Kistner
Draconula minuta Kistner ----
costata
kohli
AOwWMADOU HL WN
abdominalis
congolensis
excisicollis
alzadae
collected including 2 new species, 1 in the genus Draconula and another in the
genus Dorylocerus. The new species in Dorylocerus proved to have a cam-
panulate pronotum which knocked out the most important character which for-
merly separated the genera Dorylocerus and Dorylopora. It was therefore
decided to reexamine the relationships of all the species using numerical me-
thods. The purpose of this paper then is to present the results of these analy-
ses, to redescribe the genus Dorylocerus and synonymize the genus Dorylo-
pora, to redescribe the genus Draconula (made necessary by the inclusion of
a new species), and to redefine some of the species groups.
Since the last revision another genus, Dorylobius Raffray has been shown
to be a member of this complex and while there is not sufficient material to
dissect specimens for the numerical analyses, it will be included in the new
generic key and illustrated.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A. Characters. The species characters chosen for the numerical analy-
sis were all checked against the specimens and the published descriptions.
The list of 63 characters given in Table 2 was developed according to the gen-
eral plan outlined by Sokal and Sneath (1963). Characters were chosen which
could be scored as either present (1), absent (0), or no comparison (3).
In many instances, a character was coded easily where a structure was
present in some species and absent in others. But where a structure was pre-
sent in all 24 species, a character could be developed around the structure by
further defining it qualitatively. Character 6, "head with a well-defined longi-
tudinal-median groove,'' is an example of this. The presence of this groove in
the head is 1 of the diagnostic characteristics of the complex, and yet we find
Table 2.
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex
Dorylocerus complex.
1. Dorsal surface of head, pronotum, and elytra punctate
2. Dorsal surface of head, pronotum, and elytra with yellow setae
3. Dorsal surface of head, pronotum, and elytra with tubercles
4, Head length and width about equal
0. Head with a well-defined longitudinal median groove
6. Head with 2 lateral grooves
7. Anterior border of vertex delineated by a carina
8. Head with 2 raised longitudinal carinas
9. Head with 4 raised longitudinal carinas
10. Head with 2 posteriorly directed projections
11. Neck well-defined.
12. Pronotum length less than 0.32 mm
13. Pronotum length greater than 0.32 mm but less than 0. 42 mm
14. Pronotum length greater than 0.42 mm
15. Pronotum campanulate
16. Pronotum subquadrate
17. Lateral borders of pronotum notched or indented
18. Pronotum with a longitudinal median groove
19. Pronotum with lateral grooves
20. Pronotum with carina(s)
21. Pronotum with many chitinous projections
22. Prosternum with a well-developed median carina
23. Mesosternum shorter than metasternum
24. Intercoxal process of mesosternum carinate
25. Elytra length less than 0.27 mm
26. Elytra length greater than 0.27 mm but less than 0.35 mm
27, Elytra length greater than 0.35 mm
28. Elytra with well-defined medial ridges and with a depressed region between them
29. Elytra with well-defined lateral ridges and with a depressed region between them
30. Elytra with 3 ridges each
31. Abdominal spiracles greatly enlarged
32. Posterior border of abdominal tergite II notched
33. Posterior border of abdominal tergite III notched
34, Posterior border of abdominal tergite IV notched
35. Posterior border of abdominal tergite V notched
36. Posterior border of abdominal tergite VI notched
37. Posterior border of abdominal tergite III indented but not notched
38. Posterior border of abdominal tergite IV indented but not notched
39. Posterior border of abdominal tergite V indented but not notched
40. Posterior border of abdominal tergite VI indented but not notched
41. Posterior border of abdominal tergite VII indented but not notched
42. Posterior border of abdominal tergite II with 2 blunt projections
43. Posterior border of abdominal tergite III with 2 blunt projections
44. Posterior border of abdominal tergite IV with 2 blunt projections
45. Posterior border of abdominal tergite V with 2 blunt projections
46. Posterior border of abdominal tergite VI with 2 blunt projections
47. Abdominal tergite II with macrochaetae
48. Abdominal tergite III with macrochaetae
49. Abdominal tergite IV with macrochaetae
50. Abdominal tergite V with macrochaetae
51. Abdominal tergite VI with macrochaetae
52. Abdominal tergite VII with macrochaetae
The basic set of sixty-three characters used to compare the species of the
39
03. Sternite III with raised chitinous projections
54. Sternite IV with raised chitinous projections
09. Sternite V with raised chitinous projections
56. Sternite VI with raised chitinous projections
o7. Sternite VII with raised chitinous projections
40 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
58, Abdominal tergite II with raised areas
99. Abdominal tergite III with raised areas
60. Abdominal tergite IV with raised areas
61. Abdominal tergite V with raised areas
62. Abdominal tergite VI with raised areas
63. Abdominal tergite VII with raised areas
that in Dorylocerus minor the groove is quite pronounced, while in the species
of Fossulopora the groove is quite shallow. By stipulating that the groove be
well-defined, character 6 thus serves to differentiate these species qualita-
tively, D. minor being scored 1 for this character and the species of Fossulo-
pora being scored 0.
~~ The pronotum and elytra on were examined to determine if these
were feasible characters to use, and it was found that the lengths of each were
roughly divided into three groups as shown below:
Pronotum Elytra
pronotum less than 0. 32 elytra less than 0.27
pronotum between 0. 32 and 0. 42 elytra between 0.27 and 0. 35
pronotum greater than 0. 42 elytra greater than 0. 35
To avoid weighting these measurement characters, each species was
scored ''3" for groups not applicable to that species. All measurements in
this paper are in mm unless otherwise stated.
In coding the pronotum lengths, 3 species, Dorylocerus kohli, D. fossu-
latus, and Rodylopora attenuata, were not in 1 group exclusively and had to be
Scored "1" in 2 groups. The measurements of D. fossulatus happen to fall ex-
actly on the dividing point. There was no range in this measurement simply
because only 1 specimen of the species has ever been found. Four species re-
ceived a "1" score in 2 measurement groups for elytra length. These were
Dorylocerus alzadae, D. Kohli, D. pseudocostata, and Rodylopora attenuata.
The character coding for each species is given in Table 3.
Kistner (1968b) mentions the use of the beetles' color as a character but
notes that this characteristic sometimes does not yield reliable placement of
species, probably because of convergence. Because the color differences of
these beetles are not clearly distinctive and vary considerably within species,
coloration was not used as a character here.
Kistner's revisions of the old Dorylopora complex, include drawings of
parts of the male and female genitalia of most of the species. These show
that, while some groupings of species could possibly be made on the basis of
these structures, the structures are highly individualistic for the species.
Thus they serve to separate species more than to.show their similarities.
Therefore, the shapes of the genitalia were not used for the numerical analy-
ses.
B. Statistical comparison. The data were read into a CDC 3150 compu-
ter along with a program to produce the simple matching coefficients describ-
ed by Sokal and Michener (1958) which were then used to produce a clustering
of the species according to the weighted-pair-group method described by Sokal
and Sneath (op. cit.). Copies of this program are available upon request.
C. Other methods. To find out what the beeties had eaten, FAA fixed
specimens were imbedded in 63-65°C melting point paraffin and sectioned.
These sections were stained using a Hematoxylin-Phloxine- Light Green tech-
nique or the Matsuo tetrachrome technique. The same sections provided the
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex 41
Table 3. Character matrix of 24 species of the Dorylocerus complex. Characters are
arranged sequentially frem left to right.
10 20 30 40° 20 60
100110000013130101110010313110011100000000000000000000000000000
100110010013130101110010313110011111000000000000000000000010000
100110000011330101110010113110011000000000000000000000000111110
100110000011330101100010133000000000000000000000000000000000000
190110000011130101100010113000000000000000000000000000000000000
100111000011330101100010133000000000000000000000000000000000000
100111000011330101100010313000000000000000000000000000000000000
100111111013310101110011331110011111000001111100000000000111110
100111111013130101110011313110011100000001110000000000000111111
10 110110000013130111100010331110000000111000000000000000000000000
11 110100000013310111100010331110000000111000000000000000000000000
12 100111111013130111110111313110011100000001110000000000000111110
13 100111111011330111110111313110011100000001100000000000000111110
14 100111000013130111100010311110011110000001111000000000000011110
15 100111000013310111100010331110011110000001111000000000000011110
16 100111000013130111110010313110011110000001111000000000000001110
17 110100000011131011100001313010100000000000000000000000000000000
18 011000000013111001100010311110100000111000000011111100000000000
19 010100000111330100100010133000011100000000000011110000000000000
20 010100000111330100000010133010001111000000000011111000000011110
21 010100000113130100100010313110011000011110000011110000000011111
22 000010100001330011111110133111011100000001110000011111111111100
23 001010100003130011100110133110011111000001111011111111111111110
24 100011010113131001110111331110011110000101111000000000000111110
OOD’ LP WNHW ke
basis for a gland survey.
Observations of behavior were made in the field directly in the ant col-
umns as well as with specimens placed in petri dishes or Wilson ant nests to-
gether with their hosts.
RESULTS
Half of the original coefficients of association are shown in Table 4, the
other half being a mirror-image of what is shown in the table. The degree of
affinity of all the species is represented in the phenogram shown in Fig. 1.
The abscissa is the magnitude of the coefficient of association and the actual
value is given at each branch in the phenogram. The relationships are the
same as those determined by traditional means by Kistner, but there are cer-
tain exceptions which follow:
The old genus Dorylopora is synonymous with Dorylocerus. This was ob-
vious to us as soon as the new species D. carinata showed up but it is interest-
ing that the clustering technique put D. fossulatus between the congolensis
group and the costata group. The name . Dorylocerus s has priority by page so
all species formerly in the genus Dorylopora are herewith transferred to Dor-
ylocerus. These species are: D. afer, D. kohli, D. morio, D. nigra, D
congolensis, D. ivoiriensis, D. « costata, “Dz fletcheri, D. pseudocostata, D.
abdominalis, D. carlislei, D. excisicollis, D. solea, D. alzadae, D. kalon-
42 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
geana, and D. minor. The new species of Dorylocerus is distinct and is de-
scribed below.
Table 4. First matrix of coefficients of relationship for the species of the Dorylocerus
complex,
2 3 4 5 6 tf 8 ee aims Bl V2 NS 4a ie, LO ee Oak? 2 VB AO 20) 21 2225 23.4. 24
1 .932 .897 .895 .898 .877 .879 .702 .763 .845 .825 .746 .759 .797 .789 .831 .780 .644 .789 .649 .661 .579 .466 .672
2 -862 .825 .831 .807 .810 .772 .763 .776 .754 .746 .759 .797 .789 .797 .712 .576 .719 .684 .627 .544 .500 .707
3 -831 .833 .814 .814 .772 .828 .772 .754 .810 .831 .828 .825 .828 .712 .569 .695 .695 .724 .627 .534 .737
4 1.000 .983 .983 .596 .649 .877 .860 .632 .655 .719 .719 .719 .845 .667 .797 .661 .614 .492 .397 .561
5 -983 .983 .596 .661 .879 .860 .644 .661 .729 .719 .729 .850 .678 .797 .661 .627 .492 .407 .569
6 1.000 .614 .667 .860 .842 .649 .672 .737 .737 .737 .828 .649 .780 .644 .596 .475 .379 .579
1 614 .672 .860 .842 .655 .678 .741 .737 .741 .831. .655 .776 .638 .603 .466 .368 .579
8 2912 .552 .542 .895 .3877 .845 .847 .842 .509 .356 .491 .561 .491 .561 .579 .828
9 603 .579 .949 .931 .831 .825 .831 .576 .407 .544 544 .593 .614 .534 .810
10 .983 .621 .632 .712 .707 .707 .828 .763 .702 .596°.672 .456 .379 .525
11 596 .614 .690 .695 .684 .842 .780 .719 .614 .684 .439 .351 .500
12 -983 .847 .842 .847 .593 .390 .526 .526 .542 .667 .586 .828
13 .828 .825 .828 .610 .397 .552 .552 .552 .655 .561 .807
14 1.000 .966 .644 .483 .614 .649 .627 .614 .638 .814
15 965 .632 .475 .614 .649 .614 .614 .632 .819
16 .644 .475 .614 .614 .593 .614 .603 .810
17 .729 .707 .603 .576 .431 .345 .552
18 .102 .632 .678 .421 .483 .424
19 .831 .789 .458 .466 .491
20 .789 .458 .569 .526
21 404 .466 .534
22 -810 .596
23 .586
The new species of Draconula is distinct and is described below. Since
the second species is sufficiently different from D. minuta, the only previous-
ly known species, it changes the generic concept a bit and so Draconula is re-
described below.
afer
kohli
morio
nigra
congolensis
837 ae ivoiriensis
fossulatus
- costata
879 wee fletcheri
pseudocostata
abdominalis
‘670 899 carlislei
940 excisicollis
.838 985 solea
1000 alzadae
966 kalongeana
oe B16 minor
carinata
B3i camerounicus
497 789 congolensis 20] Fossulopora
672 orientalis 2\
attenuata 18] Rodylopora
minuta
22
.810 dacellei 23 Draconula
1000
983
1.000
.860
169
Dorylocerus
Fig. 1--Phenogram of the genera and species of the Dorylocerus complex.
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex 43
The abdominalis group of the genus Dorylocerus should be restructured
to include the old excisicollis and alzadae groups following the cluster shown
in Fig. 1. A key to the new species groups will be included plus a key to all
species within each group.
KEY TO GENERA OF THE DORYLOCERUS COMPLEX
1 Head, pronotum, and elytra all with groOveS.......cceccccscccccccces 2
Head, pronotum and elytra not all grooved (1 or 2 may be grooved but
notall es.cocax sin Ms oe other generic complexes of the tribe Deremini
2 (1) Abdominal tergites II-VII without macrochaetae; dorsal surfaces of the
head, pronotum, and elytra punctate.......cccsesees -.-... Dorylocerus
Abdominal tergites II-VII with some macrochaetae; dorsal surfaces of
the head, pronotum, and elytra shagreened or smooth and shiny...... 3
3 (2) Pronotum spindle-shaped, sometimes with lateral projections, always
with chitinous projections; sternites and tergites with raised chitinous
PLOPSCTUONS a5 ails tage oscars we A ae ee aie Se ee ee ae ww ed Draconula
Pronotum not spindle-shaped, never with lateral projections; tergites
only with raised chitinous: projections? sei 8 Caw is OS es as 4
4 (3) Pronotum with a median hole; abdominal spiracles normal in size.....
Spats ey Rs PR ea ee TR hs OR eres ibaa ae wae eA we ae wos ae Fossulopora
Pronotum with a median groove; abdominal spiracles greatly enlarged
5 (4) Eyes extremely small, located just at base of antennae..............
je 5 SRI SO OR. sia w cba d dae ara ee eee Ons (a ese)
Eyes Of MOTI A LIZ Oe cesar nis swisha les ve bes be See ee Rodylopora
Redescription of the Genus Draconula
Distinguished from all other genera including Rodylopora to which it is
most closely related by the unique head and pronotum shape and the unique
form of the abdominal macrochaetae.
Head capsule one-fifth to one-half longer than wide, with a short, thick
neck. Head with many chitinous projections bearing chaetae, the number and
arrangement variable by species. Eyes present, ovoid, placed anteriorly on
head. Antennae inserted between eyes. Gula distinct. Mouthparts shaped as
in Dorylocerus, with all palpi having a similar complement of segments. An-
tennae 11-segmented.
Pronotum with chitinous projections, the number and arrangement vari-
able by species. Prosternum shaped as in Dorylocerus excisicollis and D.
solea, with well-defined carina longitudinally along midline. Each elytron
with well-defined carinas, the number and detailed structure of which vary by
Species. Mesothoracic peritremes well-defined, containing mesothoracic
spiracles and closing procoxal cavities behind. Mesosternum with a long,
thin, acarinate process extending to metasternum between metacoxae. Meso-
sternum short, metasternum long. Legs shaped as in Dorylocerus; tarsal
formula 4-5-5.
Abdominal segment I membranous. Segment II represented by the tergite
only. Segments III-VII each with a tergite, sternite, and 2 pairs of parater-
gites. Inner paratergites of segment VII reduced to small sclerites near
spiracle. Spiracles on abdominal segments not conspicuously enlarged. Seg-
44 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
ment VIII represented by a tergite and sternite only. Segment IX complex,
shaped as in Dorylocerus. Tergal gland reservoir beneath tergite VI. Open-
ing to the tergal gland on the anterior border of tergite VII. Sternites II-VI
with raised, chitinous projections. Tergites with raised chitinous projections,
the number variable by species. Spermatheca exceedingly small and transpar-
ent. Male genitalia unknown.
KEY TO SPECIES OF DRACONULA
Lateral border of pronotum with 2 distinct indentations........ .... D. minuta
Lateral border of pronotum smooth and evenly indented toward the middle....
ose le bak kA DR nek SEE eK eR Tee Shes ees . D. decellei
Draconula decellei, n. sp.
Figures 2A & 3A
Most closely related to D. minuta from which it is distinguished by the
shape of the pronotum, which is acarinate and bears a lesser number of pro-
jections; the lesser number of carinas on the elytra; and the sculpturing of the
abdominal tergites.
Yellowish-brown through-
out; head and pronotum a little
darker; elytra much darker.
Ground sculpture of head, pro-
notum, and elytra shagreened.
Head with 14 large tubercles
arranged in 4 rows, 2 dorsal
and 2 lateral, the dorsal rows
of five tubercles each leading
anteriorly to a U-shaped up-
raised carina at anterior mar-
gin of head with a finely ser-
rate edge. Anterior-most tu-
bercles with two short chaetae,
the area between the bases of
the chaetae slightly depressed.
All other tubercles with one
chaeta. Lateral rows with two
tubercles each, each tubercle
with one chaeta. Pronotum a-
carinate; with one lateral chit-
. at inous projection on each side in
a ps eet on: era iN satu haat ee beetle: the anterior portion, each fol-
ellis RAREST Dorylobius sulci- lowed by a row of 4 chaetae.
acer: Elytra with well-defined lateral
and medial carinas with deeply depressed areas between them. Sculpture and
facies as in Fig. 2A; abdominal tergites II-VIII as in Fig. 3A; with projections
from posterior borders and macrochdaetotaxy as shown and with raised areas.
In addition, the dorsal edges of sternites III-VII are raised, forming lateral
carinas which have their highest point anteriorly and taper down posteriorly;
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex 45
sternites II-VI also have projections each bearing 2 chaetae, as shown in Fig.
3A. Genitalia unknown.
Measurements--Head length, 0.30; head width, 0.20; pronotum length,
0.38; elytra length, 0.27. Number measured, 1.
Holotype--1¢ No. 13630, Zaire Republic, Yangambi, nr. Stanleyville, 16.
XI. 1955, Coll. J. Décelle, with Dorylus (Anomma) kohli Wasmann. In the
collection of the Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, Tervuren.
Genus Dorylocerus Wasmann (Reconstituted)
Dorylocerus Wasmann 1904: 627; Seevers 1965: 298; Kistner 1968: 275
Dorylopora Wasmann 1904: 628; Wasmann 1915: 203, (revision and key);
Fenyes 1920: 334; Seevers 1965: 298-9 (listing plus a catalog of species);
Kistner 1966: 342 (revision); Kistner 1968: 275 (key to genera); 279 (new rec-
ords). New Synonymy.
Dorylocosta Cameron 1930: 416 (proposed as a subgenus); Kistner 1966: 342
(synonymy to Dorylopora).
The key given on p. (43) will serve to distinguish this genus from all oth-
ers. The description as given by Kistner (1966) for Dorylopora still holds ex-
cept that the pronotum shape is still more variable as the genus now includes
2 species with campanulate pronota.
B
Fig. 3--Abdominal tergites II-VII: A, Draconula decellei; B, Dorylocerus carinata.
KEY TO THE SPECIES GROUPS OF DORYLOCERUS
1 Posterior borders of abdominal tergites with no notches or indentations
of any kind...... os Oe ie aie aie udee BS aii ids bs eC eRe 2
Posterior borders of abdominal tergites with at least one notch and/or
DOT OH OB e, eC 6 ons 0 ole S'S wie etn WN oe re 3
2 (1) Lateral borders of pronotum smooth, not notched or indented in any way
46 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
sind plea ab cau os iasa ek Rea ee SVR AM ES Sone todas Sheth ya, eal Seta aed kohli group
Lateral border of pronotum with shallow indentation as the overall shape
pronotum: is-canipantlate.ii. sghalolies Slee io sales fossulatus group
3 (1) Posterior borders of some abdominal tergites notched or indented, but
Wit WOsDEOj|CCEIONS is HE. Pas ehlea ee hie sald al LR a be ORR &
Posterior borders of some abdominal tergites notched, indented, and
With raised projections, sta 5 Aomestad. i. Gi his Se eee excisicollis group
4 (3) Lateral borders of pronotum indented................ congolensis group
Lateral borders of pronotum Smooth..........cccceceeee costata group
Dorylocerus kohli group
Species of this group can be separated from each other reliably only by
the shape of the spermathecae. Since this shape was not used for the numeri-
cal analysis, 4 of the species had perfect correlations (see Fig. 1). Four spe-
cies belong to this group: D. afer, D. kohli, D. morio, and D. nigra. We
have no new records of these species.
Dorylocerus fossulatus group
This species group has but 1 species, Dorylocerus fossulatus, which is
still known only from the type specimen.
Dorylocerus excisicollis group
This species group contains the species included in the key below. It was
formerly split into the abdominalis group, the excisicollis group, and the al-
zadae group but the way they cluster out (Fig. 1) indicates that these should all
be in 1 group if the group is going to be equivalent to the other species groups.
KEY TO SPECIES OF THE DORYLOCERUS EXISICOLLIS GROUP
1 Lateral borders of pronotum smooth, not notched ...........cccceeees 2
Lateral borders of pronotum notched or indented............ccecccccs 4
2 (1) Promotum elongate and campanulate: :.. oc Mo. s ee eee os D. carinata
Pronotum evenly rounded at lateral border..........c.cccvccccccscvccs 3
3 (2) Abdominal tergites II-VI with indentations and projections. ..abdominalis
Abdominal tergites II-IV with indentations and projections...... carlislei
4 (1) Abdominal tergites II-IV with notches; tergites II-III with projections al-
so; tergite V without notches or projectionS .........cccccccvesccccece 5)
Abdominal tergites IT-V with notches and projections...........eeee0% 6
5 (4) Abdominal tergite IV with a notch and posterior projections. . excisicollis
Abdominal tergite IV with a feeble notch but no posterior projections....
4 tiie, Sep wice ae ee aueyee ce cae Den Met se ciatel el k's Ai ete aie eos wie ROE SOS Ee RO ROE CNR ele eae 8 solea
6 (4) Raised portions of tergites III-VI all completely separated....... alzadae
Raised portions of tergites IV and V not separated distinctly into 2 rows
Eueee hey Ses DiSNa Sha We MOREE OTe ES eG Se Oe PEs ie OER TED 0 bo eee wa es oes 7
7 (6) Raised areas of tergite II joining anteriorly.............0000. kalongeana
Raised areas of tergite II not joining anteriorly. .........cccecee. minor
We have new records for 1 of the species and 1 new species:
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex 47
Dorylocerus carinata, new species
Figure 3B
Distinguished from all other species, including D. abdominalis to which it
is most closely related, by the shape of the pronotum and the sculpture of the
abdominal tergites. :
Reddish brown throughout. Ground sculpture of the head, pronotum, and
elytra punctate. Head with a median longitudinal and 2 lateral furrows which
are delineated by well-defined carinas which are smooth; anterior border of
the vertex delineated by a toothed carina. Pronotum somewhat campanulate,
with a median and 2 lateral furrows, all delineated by carinas. Lateral bor-
ders of the pronotum smooth, not notched. Elytra with raised carinas at lat-
eral and median bordersand depressed areas between them. Sculpture and fa-
cies similar to that of D. carlislei. Abdominal tergites II-VIII as shown in
Fig. 3B, tergites III-V with medial notches surrounded by posterior projec-
tions from the posterior border, also with raised portions on tergites II-VI as
shown by stippling in the figure.
Measurements--Pronotum length, 0. 360; elytra length, 0.355. Number
measured, 1.
Holotype--Male, No. 14535, Zambia, Mbala, 20. V. 1970, in an emigra-
tion column of Darvin s (Anomma) wilecrihi Emery, Nest No. 169, Coll. J. R.
Clover, D. H., A. C., A. H. and K. M. C. Kistner. In the collection of
Kistner.
Dorylocerus minor (Eichelbaum)
New Records: 6, Rhodesia, Mt. Selinda, 14-15.IV.1970, from the cen-
tral parts and ends of raiding columns of Dorylus (Anomma) nigricans ssp.
burmeisteri var. molestus (Gerst) Mayr. , nest #166 and 168, Coll. J. R.
Clover, D. H. and A. C. Kistner, and R. Boulton.
Dor ylocerus congolensis group
While the width of the pronotal furrow is wider in D. ivoiriensis than in D.
congolensis, the species are reliably separated only by the shapes of the
spermathecae.
We have a new record of the following:
Dorylocerus congolensis (Kistner)
New Record: 1, Uganda, 30 mi ex Hoima-Ft. Portal, 5 July 1970, from
the central part of a raiding column of D. (A.) nigricans ssp. burmeisteri var.
rubellus (Santschi), nest no. 185, Coll. D. H., A. C., A. H., and K. M. C.
Kistner.
Dorylocerus costata group
1. Abdominal tergites II and III only with notches........... D. pseudocostata
Abdominal tergites II, III, and IV with notches........... Bits Gi st RUNS rg. eat 2
2... Head with only-a' Median SPOOVEs:. ie ana sicceie's's ss a c's le eee are Sines D. costata
Head with a median groove defined by raised carinas......... D. fletcheri
48 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Dor ylocerus costata (Wasmann)
Additional bibliography: Dorylopora costata, Levasseur 1968: 57 (Cen-
tral African Republic, La Moboke).
New Records: 4, Uganda, 30 mi ex Hoima - Ft. Portal, 5 July 1970,
from the central part of a raiding column of D. (A.) nigricans ssp. burmeis-
teri var. rubellus (Santschi), nest no. 185, Coll. D. H., A. C., A. H., and
K. M. C. Kistner; 4, Kenya, Masai Mara Game Reserve, at Keekorok, 26
June, 1970, from the central part of a raiding column of D. (A.) nigricans
ssp. ‘burmeisteri var. molestus (Gerst.) Mayr, nest no. 184, Coll. D. H.
A. C., A. H., and K. M. C. Kistner; 2, Zambia, Mbala (Abercorn), 18-19
May 1970, ex emigration column of D. (A.) wilverthi Em., nest no. 169,Coll..
J. R. Clover, D. H., A. C., A. H., and K. M. C. Kistner.
Dor ylocerus fletcheri (Kistner)
New Records: 6, Rhodesia, Mt. Selinda, 15 April 1970, from the central
parts and end of a raiding column of D. (A.) nigricans ssp. burmeisteri var.
molestus (Gerst.) Mayr, Nest No. 168, Coll. J. +R. Clover, D. H. and A. C.
Kistner and R. Boulton.
Rodylopora attenuata Kistner
New Record: 1, Uganda, Kisubi forest near Entebbe, 14 July 1970, from
the central part of a raiding column of D. (A.) wilverthi Emery, Nest No. 186
Coll. D. H., A. C., A. H. and K. M. C. Kistner.
BIOLOGY OF THE COMPLEX
Food habits: Observations were presented by Kistner (1966) that showed
that Dorylocerus were scavengers since they were seen picking up small bits
of dropped booty on the ant columns and they were also seen inside the skel-
etons of dead driver ants in the debris piles. Examination of sectioned speci-
mens of D. costata, D. nigra, and D. minor has revealed that the gut is full
of particulate food whereas the crops of integrated myrmecophiles such as
Typhloponemys sp. and Dorylomimus kohli contain no evidence of particulate
food but have special adaptations for the absorption of liquid food that is fed to
them by the ants.
Social biology: Kistner (1966) showed that most species of Dorylocerus
are not well integrated into the ant society. Those species that are better in-
tegrated exhibit more ridges on their bodies than those which are not integra-
ted. We have recently completed a gland survey of D. costata, D. nigra, and
D. minor which revealed a general lack of glands throughout the ‘body. Small
maxillary glands were present and small gland cells were associated with a
small reservoir of the tergal defense gland under abdominal tergites Vi and
VII. Even hypodermal gland cells of type 1 (lubricating) and type 2 (exudato—
ry) (see Kistner and Pasteels 1969) are scarse in species of the Dorylocerus
complex. Since many type 2 cells and specialized glands are normally pre-
sent in integrated termitophiles (Pasteels 1968) and myrmecophiles (Hulldo-
bler 1970), the absence of large glands or clusters of gland cells supports the
idea that they are not well integrated into the society.
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex
Fig. 4-5--4, Dorylocerus alzadae in a Driver ant column with the activity on an extreme-
ly low ebb. 5, D. alzadae in a column where the ant activity is more rapid. In this in-
stance, the myrmecophile is avoiding the sentinnel workers. Both photographed in the
field at Karen, Kenya in the columns of D. (A.) nigricans ssp. burmeisteri var. molestus
(Gerst.) Mayr.
49
50 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
All of the species observed are adapted to the ant colony in that they fol-
low the trails and adapt to the ants by avoiding areas of intense ant activity.
When they travel in highly active parts of the trail, they make their way
through the small pieces of dirt which the ants spread along their trails. Pho-
tographs of their positions in the columns can be seen in Fig. 4, and 5. Fig.
6 shows how they follow the trail at the end of raiding or emigration after
most ants have already passed. The presence of the species of Dorylocerus
in both raiding and emigration columns indicates that they follow emigrations
from 1 nest to another. They would fit the behavioral criteria of generalized
species as developed by Akre and Rettenmeyer (1966) for the guests of New
World army ants. Their behavior fits all of their criteria except item 9
(attack adult ants but usually kill only injured or weak workers). They also
do not flex their abdomens.
Evolution: The phenogram of the species of the Dorylocerus complex
(Fig. 1) gives what we consider to be the most probable evolutionary sequence
of the group with the most primitive species at the top of the diagram. The
evolutionary trend is to increase the length of 1 or 2 pairs of carinas which
run from the head posteriorly over the pronotum and elytra and continue on
towards the tip of the abdomen. These ridges on the abdomen arise in 1 of
2 ways. Either they start out as a single, medial upraised area which later
splits into 2 upraised lines as in Dorylocerus or they begin as 2 rows of ma-
crochaetae which enlarge, become more heavily sclerotized and eventually
become 2 ridges as in Rodylopora and Draconula. Both processes seem to be
Fig. 6--After the end of raiding, numerous myrmecophiles of the tribe Deremini follow
the scent trail back to the nest. Photographed in the Ivory Coast at Adiopodoumé ina
trail of D. (A.) nigricans ssp. arcens (Emery)
Baker & Kistner: Dorylocerus Complex 51
operating in Fossulopora. The separation of the carinas is accentuated by
the medial indentations which are the precursors of notches, and the projec-
tions from the posterior borders of the tergites, like the macrochaetae,
serve to functionally extend the carinas from one segment to the next.
Kistner's (1966) integration data supports this view. Those species
which come closest to having 2 ridges running the length of the dorsal side of
the body generally are the most highly integrated. While the presence of
black macrochaetae may be characteristic of the nonintegrated forms of Der-
emini, the development of macrochaetae may be 1 of the first steps in the
evolution of carinas which results in better integration and a less hostile or
possibly better protected relationship with the doryline host.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank William Blackburn, Daniela Davison, Jan Fischer, Joy
Goodwin, Herbert Jacobson, Joseph Martin, Nancy Piastuch, Riley Swift,
and Angela Vendsel, all Shinner Assistants who have aided in various aspects
of this study.
LITERATURE CITED
Akre, R. D. and C. W. Rettenmeyer 1966. Behavior of Staphylinidae associ-
ated with army ants (Formicidae: Ecitonini). Journ. Kans. Entomol.
Soc. 39 (4): 745-782.
Cameron, Malcolm 1930. New species of Staphylinidae from the Belgian Con-
go (con't.). Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 19: 405-421.
Fenyes, A. 1920. Coleoptera: Fam. Staphylinidae, subfamily Aleocharinae.
Genera Insectorum, fasc. 173b: 111-414.
Hblldobler, Bert 1970. Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrme-
cophilie) bei Ameisen II. Das Gastverhiltnis des imaginalen Atemeles
pubicollis Bris. (Col. Staphylinidae) zu Myrmica und Formica (Hym.
Formicidae).
Kistner, D. H. 1966. A revision of the myrmecophilous tribe Deremini
(Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Part I: The Dorylopora complex and their
behavior. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 59 (2): 341-358.
1968a. A revision of the myrmecophilous tribe Deremini.
Part II. Additions and corrections to the Dorylopora complex. (Coleop-
tera: Staphylinidae) Pan-Pacific Entomol. 43 (4): 274-284.
1968b. A taxonomic revision of the termitophilous tribe
Termitopaedini with notes on behavior, systematics, and post-imaginal
growth (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Amer.
6 (3): 141-196.
Kistner, D. H. and J. M. Pasteels 1969. A newtribe, genus, and species of
termitophilous Aleocharinae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) from South-West
Africa with a description of its integumentary glands. Ann. Entomol.
Soc. Amer. 62 (5): 1189-1202.
Levasseur, Louis 1969. Staphylinidae (Col. ) de République Centraficaine.
Description de genre et d'espéces nouveaux. Cahiers de La Moboké 6 (1):
49-62.
52 Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 4, 1972
Pasteels, J. M. 1968. Le systeme glandulaire tégumentaire des Aleochari-
nae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) et son évolution chez les espéces term-
itophiles du genre Termitella. Arch. Biol. (Liége) 79 (3): 381-469.
Seevers, Charles H. 1965. The systematics, evolution, and zoogeography of
staphylinid beetles associated with army ants (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae).
Fieldiana: Zool. 47 (2): 137-351.
Sokal, R. R. and C. D. Michener 1958. A statistical method for evaluating
systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38: 1409-38.
Sokal, R. R. and P. H. A. Sneath 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy.
Freeman and Co., San Francisco, XVIII + 360 p.
Wasmann, Erich 1904. Zur Kenntnis der Gdste der Triberameisen und ihrer
Wirthe am Obern Congo nach den Sammlungen und Beobachtungen von P.
Herm. Kohl C. SS. C. bearbeitet. (138. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Myr-
mekophilen und Termitophilen). Zool. Jahrb. Suppl. 7: 611-682.
1915. Erster Nachtrag zur Revision der Gattung Aenictonia,
nebst einer Revision der Gattung Dorylopora Wasmann (Col.) (213. Bei-
trag zur Kenntnis der Myrmekophilen), Entomol. Mitteil. 4: 202-4.
- " l
es teat oy tae ; s
MP erat toy MAR spartan
Rede dpe rat #
ee sek
te?
‘we
ea
Pil -
pe hain rete
Um ‘7
ECTOPARASITES OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
I. SIPHONAPTERA!
By
Glenn E. Haas, Nixon Wilson,’ and P. Quentin Tomich*
ABSTRACT
The following 10 species of fleas are considered established in the Hawaiian Islands:
Echidnophaga gallinacea, Pulex irritans, P. simulans, Ctenocephalides felis felis, C. canis,
Xenopsylla cheopis, X. vexabilis, Parapsyllus laysanensis Wilson, n. sp., Nosopsyllus fasciatus, and
Leptopsylla segnis. Two additional species, Polygenis gwyni and Monopsyllus anisus, of apparently
accidental occurrence, are treated briefly. The account of each species includes: synonymy in
Hawaii, records, history of introduction and establishment, ecological distribution, sex ratio, and
hosts. A key and illustrations are provided to the species.
Supported in part by Public Health Service Research Grant No. AI-02886 from the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to the Department of Health, State of Hawaii.
2677 Deerpath Drive, Deerfield, Illinois 60015 (formerly with the Plague Research Unit,
Department of Health, State of Hawaii, Honokaa, Hawaii).
Department of Biology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, lowa 50613 (formerly
with the Plague Research Unit, Department of Health, State of Hawaii, Honokaa, Hawaii).
4Research Unit, Department of Health, State of Hawaii, Honokaa, Hawaii 96727.
If
O
uU
dst
al
‘00
Dq-—
dpa
ky
14:
sn]
|
QUDS AD
u
SIS
TM
reys
‘U
U
“ds
W
[eb
Jo
10
3
x
“CS
jiif
#
i
ae
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION Gell VERO UA RASS Pare Mage Gupte ee 4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <td Si) «: (OGSSSae i a Le ees ie a 5
SYSTEMATICS: 24, Mp CARR ERAS he RA a AS. aa. Pes 9
Key to the species? 209) '2°92 «2 ePaeee as ee BA aS Pia 9
Pulicidad® te "+. SF! DAgCe Seg ORR fos AAD addi eR ea. OU Bag 10
1: BCHGnRORNGeRSANTHGER? | >. 2 PE BRO See SPD. 10
2 PUMER BPIATSS 2 MES HER FG, Rad Tee Bea MED TN ae 12
3: Pulex SRR IE Di RO See ee St ee ae eee ees 14
4 OP ise BOD ERE ret RS PS ra Rn SS Ee 15
5. Cleaocepnaides fa eas tie Fo eS Be PS aos 15
6. Clenoccwiacs ce. hs Be BR ee ee 19
7. FORME CO on ee a eo Be ae a eee ee ee 20
O.” RCO FERS ee ee at BaP Ae Pee, Sener eee ee Paes
UG EEE bg cb, Ae ha aman tl cen tan abd ae ae: ae pat he ait ne he Ria Dalat eet Sela gl aa 31
GD FOTIEAY ES TAPSONCR AS WSO Se Se ee et ee eres 31
OE 0 glee als Hila ah: Os lp pont nae Rah gM he ee, Nel Se ap pe ie hana a 33
9 Mig RE eee yy ore ce SOR elte Tepes aac Da gt: pty beak le earedeh a ha 33
PAG LE a ce a oe ae ee ee ee ee ee ee me
PP eret SEP one EN ee eee eg as ot eam ee ee 35
ee ee ee eae ae ee A ee ae 38
Ee 01018, aime Spin hh igen ral ier darcel eis ioe Sahel gehen Butcesh 2), ioe che. Ser jeg ge 46
OE ee ger ae beg er ie ae Cabarete a i at arg 46
ied Oe Oo etl, ll ltt ie) Are rte tle a Dh epi ail aged Mage 46
cag te te Oke, oa ee Le bs | cp aie rma amet ales i air cane ih nal Mitr Paik ers trall oh Gia sab tae 47
Cig hee Ei elect GR ele ROP i dee ho kant cli Sacer Stati Ue Ramla nah NA Pg er er F2
TABLES
1. Distribution of Hawaiian Siphonaptera ...........4.4... 7
2. Host associations of Hawaiian Siphonaptera ............. 8
3. Xenopsylla vexabilis populations in Rattus exulans and Mus musculus nests
OF Gi ORT Big eo. oe ee Fe ah ae a a phe fee hae ae 30
FIGURES
1? “Map of the Hawatian Archipelago eee 6
Z8, PRIOR OR Gnd Maer een oe ee es a ce 49
DoF Fe eR sD, agar eet age len acta ae hl tee i ae ae 51
OS IO, Nagle bhi es ee ae een ee a ee a3
PU Pear RS ee cs ce oe Ree ee eee emery eee meg ae 53
Tete. CROCS POT PON ee er ee el hee oe, a
1S... CCE CU ca aed ar pe yon ale Ciel ag a 57
ig le ey 2 ina lne pe la aa le adem eis li aly a Rta ane ® SRE 50
DLT: eT te oe a Ng ihc ot aie Bae, ae Tae 61
20°90.” FAFRDSVUUS lay Suneiiis WHEOW- ND. SU.) an 5 oe hited o4 Gas ye. ae 63
31. Parapsylus lavsabense Wauseon. 1.60... oes ek 65
34. SOARS ome tee ce ag! Pe i oo ig, & Garni Tee 65
33. Parapsyilus laveaneisis Widen. NSO ss 8 es ok a 67
Be, PAPO MOM Le ei Fe eh ites” As) 5) ge ope ca lar eee rae 67
SSS 7: PROMI Tem Ge cr iy a oll Saeko e eenee O 69
SOGD,. Lena er a ae gs te ce hs iad gale ee 71
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
INTRODUCTION
Fleas have been established in Hawaii for many hundreds of years, although
most species are obviously modern introductions. The first person to indicate their
presence appears to be Campbell (1816), who resided in Honolulu in 1809 and
1810. Numerous authors subsequently commented on fleas as pests (see historical
account by Haas et al., 1971) without specifically identifying them. The first
applications of a scientific name to a flea (as Ctenocephalus canis) are in the 1907
reports by Van Dine (1908) and Van Dine and Norgaard (1908). By 1907 all present
members of the fauna except Echidnophaga gallinacea probably were established.
Consequently, we cannot refer to documented accounts of the early history of most
species. Since 1908 a large quantity of literature on fleas in the Hawaiian Islands has
accumulated, mostly because of the public health and veterinary importance of
certain species.
Twelve species are recorded, 10 of which are established on at least one of the
islands. One of the 10 species is endemic and described as new, one arrived with the
Polynesians, and the others are cosmopolitan species of recent introduction. The 10
established species represent four families and seven genera. Of the 12 species,
Rhopalopsyllus (= Polygenis) gwyni C. Fox possibly was recorded through an error
(Cole and Koepke, 1947b). This species could have been introduced but failed to
become established. In the flea collection of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’
Association (Honolulu) is a female Monopsyllus anisus (Rothschild) found in
Honolulu in a packing case from Japan, October 1932, by Q. C. Chock. M. anisus
was an immigrant from the Orient that failed to become established. If the specimen
had been inseminated and deposited with Rattus rattus or Rattus norvegicus on one
of the higher mountains, the Hawaiian Islands might have had an addition to its flea
fauna. The two species of Rattus mentioned above are common hosts in Japan
(Sakaguti, 1962, Sakaguti and Jameson, 1962). At least two specimens of M. anisus
were recovered on the Pacific Coast of North America, in San Francisco and
Vancouver (Mitzmain, 1909, Rothschild, 1910, Johnson, 1961).
In this era of greatly increased speed and volume of transportation,
introduction of additional species of fleas into the islands is likely. They could arrive
easily on small mammals such as those intercepted in recent years by quarantine
personnel (Joyce, 1968). Establishment of a resident population may be difficult,
but it is not impossible for some fleas despite loss of their true host. The cat
flea-rabbit association recently discovered on Manana Island by Tomich et al.,
(1968) is a prime example of a recently developed flea-host relationship.
This monograph includes a,compilation and summarization (Tables 1, 2) of
published records of fleas including a few that are questionable because of the recent
discovery that Pulex includes both P. irritans and P. simulans (Haas and Wilson,
1967). In addition, some early authors confused Ctenocephalides felis with
Ctenocephalides canis and failed to distinguish Xenopsylla vexabilis from Xenopsylla
cheopis. Among hosts, Rattus exulans was thought to be R. norvegicus.
In referring to the level of host specificity, we use the terms true host,
secondary host, and accidental host after Sakaguti and Jameson (1962). Rainfall and
other climatic data are from Blumenstock and Price (1967). Seasonal terms not used
according to the definitions therein are placed in quotation marks.
Most specimens recorded in this paper were identified, then triturated in tests
for plague. Other specimens were deposited in collections including those of the
Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu; British Museum (Natural History), London;
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; and the authors.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 5
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Dr. C. M. Wheeler for his interest, encouragement, and
assistance; R. H. Baker for loaning personnel to collect fleas from nests and small
mammals; Drs. J. M. Klein and R. Traub for comments on X. vexabilis; F. G. A. M.
Smit for confirming our determination of C. canis and comments on Parapsyllus
laysanensis; Dr. E. W. Jameson, Jr. for confirming our determination of M. anisus
and review of the manuscript; Dr. G. P. Holland for review of the manuscript; F. A.
Bianchi and Dr. C. R. Joyce for loaning specimens under their care; Dr. R. L. Wenzel
for assistance in obtaining literature; Dr. R. L. Pyle for allowing us to collect and
record specimens from vertebrates belonging to the Smithsonian Pacific Ocean
Biological Survey Program; Dr. W. O. Wirtz II for unpublished data from his studies
of R. exulans; and Mrs. E. Snyder for typing the manuscript for photo-offset
printing.
002
TA
off
OOVITAdIHOYV NVIIVMVH JHL JO dVWN ‘T ‘Sid
oGSl ol 09 of LI oSLl
SYSJLAIWOTIM
0
od MV 1IOOHY»™
INvW UO SIYNW)
IvNOIOW :
yall, ‘| ejney
NHvO :
‘| COUN |
ty
"| 40999N ~
eee eli: > sjBeous a3e3i44 youad4
sajoeuuld s9upsey
+} ueskey”*
"| Aysueisiy”
“a
&
Oly Sew4sy pue jieag *
"S| AempIW &
“ Jory eany
oGGl 0091 S91 oft oSLl
002
02
: off
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera
Table 1. Distribution of Hawaiian Siphonaptera
Island!
Siphonaptera be: &§
Pulicidae
1. Echidnophaga
gallinacea X X X X X
2. Pulex irritans ? ?
3. P. simulans X X ?
4. Pulex sp. Xx
5. Ctenocephalides
felis felis », 4 », 4 », 4 x », 4 x
6. CC. canis ?
7. Xenopsylla cheopis XxX XxX Xx xX
8. X. vexabilis X xX D4
Rhopalopsyllidae
9. Parapsyllus laysanensis
Wilson, n. sp. ».¢
Ceratophyllidae
10. Nosopsyilus fasciatus X X
Leptopsyllidae
11. Leptopsylla segnis X X X
: Unlisted islands and islets lack positive records.
Other localities
Widespread in the tropics
X | and subtropics; occasional
in some cooler regions
X | Cosmopolitan
X | Nearctic and Neotropical
Regions
X | Cosmopolitan
X | Cosmopolitan in more
temperate regions
X | Cosmopolitan
X | SE Asia (Thailand, Cam-
bodia, Philippines), Australia,
New Guinea, New Zealand,
Kermadec Is.
X | Cosmopolitan
X | Cosmopolitan
Table 2. Host Associations of Hawaiian Siphonaptera
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
», «
xX
X
ar <>
sane BRB
snynotund sn3ejo}d AIO
Xx
Xx
X |X |X
hae ee
X |X| X
X |X| X
xX
X | X
suaides OWOF]
uop snj}e}9undoIme *
X
9
Xx
X
X
», 4
X
xX
X
X
4
snjejyoundoine sa}sodioqy
SN}29 Sijo7
Xx
X X
X
x
poys sierrurey *) * a
slrelIuey stues meee KK
snine} sog
Sou snoijied snuiyyng
“A
60
3
cs)
&
=}
5
a,
=
=}
8
3
B
e
oes |
}SoU SNOI}SOWOPp *g
SNO}}SOWOPp Josseg
snoiuloyyes xAj10ydoT
snyjes snes
}SoU SI]IQeINWU vopowWloig
SISUSOIAPURS B)ULIG
X X}|}X/|X
X
Q
a A
2 5 = =
PA S ae 3 f
® 2 = = » ae 5 2
ao 8<6 2. ae 3 oe 8 2 JS
S2ES abs SS BS 2235 SE
S822 282282 BBS Se Ss
ead BS ——| Oo o Ss n>) —_
— ee Be eee ieee oO 8s iS)
aa G2@eeO OM aa S274 4
5 a. = 2
= é eee Se: a
é- Nmnetn Or wo So ss
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera
SYSTEMATICS
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF FLEAS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
Eye Well Geverome ce a ee he eee eer ee eer als 2
Eve reduced: a. jek Gite tote ee eee ee ars 11. Leptopsylla segnis (p.
Genal comb (gen.cb.) present (Ctenocephalides) ......... 3
Genal comb absent or represented by single inconspicuous tooth . . 4
First spine of genal comb about half as long as second; head relatively
short:and rounded’: <.; 255. 32. 6. a 6. Ctenocephalides canis (p.
First spine of genal comb not much shorter than second; head
eloneated-and sloping § 2 Met. le re: aie SPURL eee EER
Pronotal comb (pr.cb.) present ..... 10. Nosopsyllus fasciatus (p.
PRONOTAG COM DA OSONd, Lacie cas (lek le ae ire Ua us ee ane 2 5
Prone evenly founged o'er eR ee oe EO fe bd ple 6
Frons- aneulate =A: ss a he ee es ee 1. Echidnophaga gallinacea (p.
Pleural rode(olte) presen’, | Fes BON POE CR ras gh Rr aseee y
Pleural fod apsent (Palen). se Hie Ser Me eee, ee a 9
Frontal tubercle (fr.tub.) present, arrowhead-shaped ....... .
see ah ra aie See Lm: 9. Parapsyllus laysanensis Wilson, n. sp. (p.
Frontal tuberele absent (XenOpsSVla) ee ee oe BRO A 8
Distal arm of sternum IX (d.a.st.[X) curved upward at apex,
ventrocaudal margin darkly pigmented; ventral margin of hilla (hi.)
extended well below ventral margin of bulga(bu.) ........
Tes Mile ol REALS OTS ERR a Re AC 8. Xenopsylla vexabilis (p.
Distal arm of sternum IX not appreciably curved upward at apex,
lightly pigmented throughout; ventral margin of hilla and bulga
ANOS Otrone Diane ee ett aa Get etna ao rage
Crochet (cr.) rod-shaped (females not separable) . . 3. Pulex simulans (p
Crochet (ah@ian oo ee gta tok ae gee 2. Pulex irritans (p
35)
19)
45)
33)
10)
31)
23)
. 20)
. 14)
ae
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
PULICIDAE
1. ECHIDNOPHAGA GALLINACEA (WESTWOOD)
(Figures 2-4)
Sarcopsyllus gallinaceus Westwood, 1875, Ent. Mon. Mag. 11:246.
Xestopsylla gallinacea: Mlingworth, 1915, Haw. Forester Agr. 12:130.—Illingworth, 1915, Proc.
Haw. Ent. Soc. 3:113.
Echidnophaga gallinacea: Wlingworth, 1915, J. Econ. Ent. 8:492.--Illingworth, 1916, Proc. Haw.
Ent. Soc. 3:252.--Timberlake et al., 1921, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 4:609.--Illingworth, 1923, Proc.
Haw. Ent. Soc. 5:270.--Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:210.--Pemberton, 1925, Bull.
Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull. No. 17:44.-Bice, 1932, Haw. Agr. Exp.
Sta. Circ. 5:36.-Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13-18, 33, 48-50, 60.-Shaftesbury,
1934, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 49:248.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 50:256.--Stiles &
Baker, 1935, Nat. Inst. Hlth. Bull. No. 163:1090.--Thompson, 1937, Ent. Mon. Mag.
73:186.--Alicata, 1942, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 32:57.-Ewing & Fox, 1943, U.S. Dept. Agr. Misc.
Pub. No. 500:121.--Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:192.--Simmons et al., 1944, Global
Epidemiology, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 290.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet.
1940-41, p. 14.-Rumreich & Koepke, 1945, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1422.--Alicata, 1947, Pacif.
Sci. 1:71, 77, 78, 80, 81.--Cole & Koepke, 1947, Pub. Hith. Rep. Suppl. 202:28-30, 32, 35, 36,
38-40.~-Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:227.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep.
66:1542.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1953, An Illustrated
Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural
History), vol. I, p. 94.--Kartman & Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 13:50.--Fullaway,
1959, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 17:23.--Becklund, 1964, Am. J. Vet. Res. 25:1399, 1405,
1412.--Alicata, 1967, Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 43, 46, 70, 74, 78, 85, 36, 96,
100, 101, 107, 108, 111, 114.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects,
Feb. 1967, Preliminary List of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 20,
31.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List
of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 10, 16.--Malley & Devick, 1968,
Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., pp. 274, 281.--Muirhead-Thomson, 1968, Ecology of Insect
Vector Populations, pp. 107, 108.--Tomich et al., 1968, Pacif. Sci. 22:363.-Travis et al., 1968,
U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 200.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and
Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54, 55, 59, 86, 90, 95, 109-110, 134, 139, 141, 150, 151, 155,
159.-Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, pp. 133, 148.
Sarcopsylla gallinacea: Wilcox, 1915, Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. 1914, p. 24.--Fullaway, 1922,
Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 5:12.
Echidnophaga gallinacea gallinacea: Costa Lima & Hathaway, 1946, Monogr. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz
No. 4:135, 136.
Echidnophaga gallinaceae (sic): Schwartz & Schwartz, 1949, A Reconnaissance of the Game Birds
in Hawaii, p. 167.--Schwartz & Schwartz, 1950, Auk 67:25.
DISTRIBUTION. Widespread in tropical and subtropical areas; occasional in
some cooler regions.
KAUAI. Haena, 2 m: 4 9°, ex Canis familiaris, Mar. 1964, N. Wilson. Hanapepe: 1 6, 9 99,
ex 3 C. familiaris, Mar. 1964, NW & G. E. Haas. Waimea Dist.: 13 66, 19 99, ex 60 Rattus
norvegicus, June 1960, J. T. Kajiwara; 2 66, 4 99, ex 11 Rattus exulans, Dec. 1960, JTK.
OAHU. Recorded by Illingworth (1915b) from chickens and poultry yard and (1915a,c)
from chickens, chicken roosting boards, chicken houses, and English sparrows; recorded by Wilcox
(1915) from chickens, chicken yards, chicken bldgs., rats, and cats in Honolulu; recorded by
Illingworth (1916) from chickens, chicken roosting board, and hen house; recorded by Bridwell
(1917) from sparrow nests in a cavelike excavation at the side of Diamond Head road; recorded by
Illingworth (1923) from poultry; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Aiea, Honolulu, Kipapa,
Waimanalo, and Waipahu; recorded by Alicata (1942) from a dog in Honolulu; recorded by
Rumreich and Koepke (1945) from commensal rats in Honolulu; recorded by Cole and Koepke
(1947b) from mongooses, Rattus hawaiiensis, R. norvegicus, and Rattus rattus in Honolulu;
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 11
recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953). ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Honolulu (Fort
Armstrong): 1 9, ex Felis catus, June 1947, C. R. Joyce; (Kaimuki): 22 99, ex R. norvegicus, Jan.
1939, C. E. Pemberton; (Manoa Valley): 1 6, 2 99, ex R. rattus, Dec. 1941, CEP; (Quarantine
Station): 8 99, ex C. familiaris, May 1964. Kailua: 1 6, 2 9, ex F. catus, Apr. 1928. Koko Head:
1 9, ex C. familiaris, “fall” 1967, P. W. Schaefer.
MANANA (1.3 km off SE tip of Oahu). Recorded by Tomich et al. (1968) from Oryctolagus
cuniculus.
MOLOKAI. Kaunakakai, 3 m: 3 dd, ex C. familiaris, Feb. 1965, GEH & P. Q. Tomich.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Haiku, Kahului, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia,
Makawao, Olinda, Puunene, Upper Paia (Paia), and Wailuku; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild
(1953) from rats. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Haleakala Crater (Kapalaoa cabin), 2,217 m: 3 dd, 3
99, ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Feb. 1964, D. M. Tsuda. Keokea (Kula area): 1 9, ex H.
auropunctatus, Dec. 1966, W. Garcia. Kihei: 8 6d, 25 99, ex 5 H. auropunctatus, Oct. 1966, WG; 2
6d, 6 29, ex 23 R. rattus, Nov. 1966, WG. Lahaina: 8 6d, 18 °°, ex 27 H. auropunctatus, Dec.
1966, WG. Omaopio area (Makawao Dist.): 1 6, 3 99, ex 8 H. auropunctatus, Sept., Oct. 1966,
WG.
HAWAII. Recorded by Fullaway (1922) in Waimea (Kamuela); recorded by Ewing (1924)
from Herpestes birmanicus and C. familiaris in Honokaa; recorded by Pemberton (1925) from cats
and dogs in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Hilo, Honokaa, Kalopa,
Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Lower Pohakea, Olaa (Keaau), and the S Hilo Dist.; recorded by Gross and
Bonnet (1951) in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats in
Honokaa; recorded by Kartman and Lonergan (1955) in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Fullaway
(1959) from a nene goose at Pohakuloa; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from mongooses
and rodents. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Halaula (Kohala Mill), 64 m: 2 66, 1 9, ex C. familiaris,
May 1964, G. P. Mills & T. Sagucio. Humuula, 2,043 m: 1 6, 12 99; 10 dd, 18 99, ex H.
auropunctatus, May 1969, PQT. Kawaihae, 15 m: 2 66, 7 99, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM &
TS. Kukaiau Ranch (NE slope Mauna Kea), 1,952 m: 1 6, 11 29, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1964,
GPM & TS. Makahalau Camp, 1,171 m: many, ex C. familiaris & H. auropunctatus, Nov. 1962,
GEH & GPM. Napoopoo: 1 d, 16 99, ex C. familiaris, Jan. 1962, NW; (1.4 km N: Hikiau Heiau), 5
m: 2 99; 6 99, ex 1, 3 H. auropunctatus, Jan., Feb. 1962, NW & S. Kaaekuahiwi. Niulii, 46 m: 3
66, 7 92, ex 2 C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Onomea, 76 m: 5 99, ex C. familiaris, May
1964, GPM & TS. Puako (beach park), 3 m: 2 66, 15 99, ex 3 H. auropunctatus, July 1968, SK &
E. Auna. Puu Kihe (NE slope Mauna Kea, cabins), 2,364 m: 3 99, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1968,
SK & EA. Umikoa (Kukaiau Ranch Headquarters), 1,067 m: 3 99, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb.
1964, GPM & TS. Waikii (5.2 km SSE: Kilohana Girl Scout Camp), 1,708 m: 10 99, ex H.
auropunctatus, July 1962, W. Graf.
HOSTS. Recorded from Branta sandvicensis, Gallus gallus and roosts, yards,
‘and houses, Lophortyx californicus, Passer domesticus and nest, C. familiaris, F.
catus, H. auropunctatus, Mus musculus, O. cuniculus, R. exulans, R. norvegicus, R.
rattus, and Sus scrofa.
The sticktight flea, E. gallinacea, was first recorded from Hawaii by Illingworth
(1915a). The approximate date of introduction of E. gallinacea is the best
documented of all fleas. Its sudden and noticeable appearance on chickens in
Honolulu resulted in a series of papers: Illingworth (1915a,b,c, 1916) and Wilcox
(1915). Illingworth (1915a) reported that entomologists had not noticed this flea
prior to 1913 and that the first specimens in the College of Hawaii collection were
taken in November 1913. In his report for 1914, Wilcox (1915) reported this flea’s
appearance in Honolulu during the past year (1913). To determine the date of
introduction and the rate of spread between and on the islands, Illingworth (191 5a)
asked poultry owners and others to submit a postcard stating when and where the
fleas were first noticed. We have found neither published nor unpublished results of
this survey. We know, however, from Fullaway (1922) that by May 1921 E.
gallinacea had spread to the Island of Hawaii. It was not recorded from Maui until
Eskey’s (1934) report. Our Kauai and Molokai records appear to be the first ones for
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
those islands. The presence of sticktight fleas on Lanai is probable.
We concur with Illingworth (1915a) that the source of EF. gallinacea was quite
probably poultry from California. As this flea also parasitizes mammals, such as
dogs, cats, and rats, poultry may not have been the sole means of transport between
Oahu and the other islands.
E. gallinacea is widely distributed altitudinally between sea level and 2,364 m
(Puu Kihe Cabins, Mauna Kea). It occurs in the arid zone around Kawaihae Bay
(average annual rainfall less than 188 mm) to wet Onomea (rainfall about 3,476
mm). Apparently elevation (temperature) is not a limiting factor, but extremely
heavy rainfall may be detrimental. Although it occurs on five of the main islands, E.
gallinacea is seemingly absent from many localities, and where found it has typically
a distribution referred to as “contagious” by Cole and Koepke (1947b). Most
specimens aggregate onto one or a few of several seemingly equally suitable host
animals. The sessile females frequently clump together to form a crustlike group.
A peculiarity in the geographic distribution of E. gallinacea on the Island of
Hawaii is the continued absence of this flea from rats and other mammals in the
enzootic plague area following the general application of DDT around dwellings
between 1945 and 1961. From 1932 (Eskey, 1934) to February 1954, plague
surveillance personnel found sticktight fleas on rats trapped in the area.
The seasonal occurrence of the sticktight flea, based primarily on data from R.
norvegicus, had a peak during July-October and a low during April-June (Eskey,
1934). Our data indicate that the sex ratio of individuals on hosts is unequal in favor
of females.
E. gallinacea has the widest host range of the fleas occurring in the islands.
Birds generally are considered true hosts, but many mammals are well-known hosts,
and some, such as dogs and mongooses, probably qualify as true hosts in Hawaii.
Eskey (1934) reported that adult male rats were more frequently infested than
females and that young rats were rarely infested. He pooled species of rats in each
locality so it is impossible to know if all three species were infested in all localities.
Of the three species of rats, R. norvegicus had the heaviest infestation (Eskey, 1934,
Cole and Koepke, 1947b). Eskey (1934) was first to record M. musculus as a host,
but he did not specify on which island(s) the infested mice (and mongooses) were
trapped. Other original host records not located on any particular island are pigs by
Bonnet (1948) and California quail by Schwartz and Schwartz (1949).
2. PULEX IRRITANS LINNAEUS
(Figures 5-9)
Pulex irritans Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat., 10th ed., 1:614.
Pulex irritans: Bryan, 1915, Natural History of Hawaii, p. 401.--Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No.
213:13, 50.-Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hith. Rep. 50:257.--Thompson, 1937, Ent. Mon. Mag.
73:186.--Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.--Simmons et al., 1944, Global Epidemiology,
vol. I, pt. 2, p. 289.-Fullaway & Krauss, 1945, Common Insects of Hawaii, p. 24, pl. I, fig.
30.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p. 14.--Bonnet, 1948,
Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:227.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 66:1542.--Baldwin et al.,
1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Kartman & Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 13:50.--Nichols,
1963, State Haw., Div. Fish Game, Hnl., Proj. W-5-R-14, p. 7.--Alicata, 1967, Haw. Agr. Exp.
Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 86, 101, 107, 113, 114.-Haas & Wilson, 1967, J. Med. Ent.
4:25-29.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Feb. 1967, Preliminary
List of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 11, 41.--Haw. Ent. Soc.
Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List of Common Names
of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 6, 21.--Malley & Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange
Proc., pp. 278, 281.-Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 13
201.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54, 55, 90, 110, 141, 142,
150, 157, 159.--Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography, p.
178.--Haas et al., 1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60, 70.--Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, pp.
133, 203.
Pulex irritans [partim] : Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:209.--Pemberton, 1925, Bull. Exp.
Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull. No. 17:44.
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan.
OAHU. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from premises of householders in Honolulu and from
rats.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats.
HAWAII. Recorded by Ewing (1924) from Canis familiaris in Honokaa; recorded by
Pemberton (1925) from dogs in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from dogs and rats
in the Hamakua Dist. and from rats in the Hilo and vicinity sector; recorded by Gross and Bonnet
(1951) in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Kartman and Lonergan (1955) in the Hamakua Dist.;
recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from C. familiaris in Haina, Hilo, Honokaa, Humuula, Kahua
Ranch, Kapulena, Kukuihaele, Ookala, Paauilo, Pohakuloa, Puuanahulu, Puu Waawaa Ranch, and
Umikoa, and from Sus scrofa in Hanaipoe; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from dogs.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Humuula, 2,043 m: 8 dd, 19 29, in abandoned dog shed, Aug. 1968,
S. Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna; 4 66, 5 99, in abandoned dog shed, Mar. 1969, P. Q. Tomich; 3 dd, 5
99, ex C. familiaris, Mar. 1969, PQT; 3 66, ex C. familiaris (from Kamuela), Mar. 1969, PQT; 3 dd,
4 99; 1 6,4 99;1 6, 7 99; 1 6, ex C. familiaris (4th host from Kamuela), Apr. 1969, PQT; 2 dd, ex
C. familiaris, Aug. 1969, PQT. Puu Laau (1.6 km NE: Kamakoa Gulch), 2,700 m: 4 dd, 4 ?9, ex S.
scrofa, Nov. 1969, J. G. Giffin; (0.8 km NE), 2,300 m: 2 de, 2 99, ex S. scrofa, Mar. 1970, JGG.
HOSTS. Recorded from C. familiaris, Herpestes auropunctatus, rats, S. scrofa,
an abandoned dog shed, and premises of householders (?houses and yards).
The human flea, P. irritans, was first recorded by Bryan (1915), but his
statement is presumptive rather than based on specimens examined critically. Any
records that cannot be verified by examination of specimens must be placed in
doubt because in most localities the probability is greater that the species is Pulex
simulans. This is especially true for specimens collected near sea level. An added
difficulty is that only males have morphologically distinguishing characters.
P. irritans perhaps was introduced originally on dogs in the eighteenth or
nineteenth century. The earliest confirmed collection of P. irritans is by Pemberton
on 17 December 1922 (see Haas and Wilson, 1967). He collected a male from a dog
in Honokaa. At the same time and place he also collected at least two males of P.
simulans. Ewing (1924) recorded all 14 of Pemberton’s specimens (sex not specified)
as P. irritans. Eskey (1934) again recorded human fleas from the Island of Hawaii
and added Oahu and Maui. He was first to record P. irritans on rats and a mongoose,
but he did not specify on which island the infested mongoose was trapped.
We are unable to confirm the occurrence of P. irritans on any island other than
Hawaii (Table 1), and there it was found only to the north and rarely in areas near
sea level. It occurred in the mountains as high as 2,043 m at Humuula. The
altitudinal distribution of P. irritans is the type expected of a flea adapted to a
temperate rather than subtropical climate.
As related to average annual rainfall, P. irritans does not range down into the
low, hot semidesert around Kawaihae Bay (rainfall less than 188 mm); but it occurs
with P. simulans in the high, cool, dry area at Pohakuloa (rainfall between 381 and
508 mm). The Kawaihae Bay area is undoubtedly too hot, so aridity cannot be
considered as the limiting factor. The wettest locality that evidently has a resident
population of P. irritans is Ookala (rainfall 2,921 mm). Thus in contrast to P.
simulans, it has a much narrower geographic range.
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Seasonal occurrence and sex ratio of P. irritans is unknown for lack of
sufficient data. Only a few P. irritans females were captured alive and isolated for
specific determination by rearing their male progeny.
The dog is a true host of P. irritans, and recent data suggest that the wild pig is
at least a secondary host. Whether or not man should be classified as a true,
secondary, or only accidental host is undecided for lack of sufficient data. We
disagree with Pemberton (1943) that the cat is a normal host. He (Pemberton, 1925)
recorded collecting 636 specimens of P. irritans from dogs, but none from cats. The
cats had only cat fleas and sticktight fleas. The flea collection at the Hawaiian Sugar
Planters’ Association in Honolulu contains numerous fleas collected by Pemberton,
but there is not one human flea from a cat. Therefore, his 1943 statement appears to
be in error or is a generality not based on collections in Hawaii. Consequently, we do
not accept subsequent statements based on Pemberton (1943) that P. irritans was
found on cats in Hawaii. Furthermore, without specimens to reexamine, we must
question Eskey’s (1934) records of P. irritans from premises of householders, from
rats, and a mongoose (Table 2).
3. PULEX SIMULANS BAKER
(Figure 10)
Pulex simulans Baker, 1895, Can. Ent. 27:65, 67.
Pulex irritans [partim] : Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:209.--Pemberton, 1925, Bull. Exp.
Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull. No. 17:44.
?Pulex irritans [partim] : Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13, 50.
Pulex simulans: Haas & Wilson, 1967, J. Med. Ent. 4:25-28.--Malley & Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif.
Interchange Proc., pp. 278, 281.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep.
68-61-ES, p. 202.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 90,
142.-Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography, p. 178.--Haas
et al., 1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60. —
DISTRIBUTION. Nearctic and Neotropical Regions; Hawaiian Islands.
KAUAI. Recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from Canis familiaris in Haena.
OAHU. Recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from under a house in Honolulu.
HAWAII. Recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from C. familiaris in Captain Cook,
Glenwood, Haina, Hakalau, Halaula School (grounds), Halawa, Hawi, Hilo, Holualoa, Honalo,
Honaunau, Honohina, Honokaa, Honokahau, Honomu, Hookena, Humuula, Kahaluu, Kailua,
Kaimu, Kainaliu, Kalapana, Kamuela, Kapaau, Kapoho, Kapulena, Kaumana, Kawaihae,
Kealakekua, Kealia, Keauhou, Keauhou Ranch, Keaukaha, Kilauea Military Camp, Kohala Mill,
Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Kupaahu, Kurtistown, Laupahoehoe, Mahukona, Makahalau, Makapala,
Milolii, Mountain View, Naalehu, Napoopoo, Ninole, Niulii, Olaa, Onomea, Ookala, Paauhau,
Paauilo, Pahala, Pahoa, Papaaloa, Papaikou, Pepeekeo, Piihonua, Pohakea Ranch, Pohakuloa,
Pohoiki, Puako, Punaluu, Puu Waawaa (Ranch), Puuanahulu, Umikoa, Waiakea Camp No. 6,
Waikii, Waiohinu, Waipio Valley, and Wood Valley; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from
dogs. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Honokaa: 2 dd, ex C. familiaris, Dec. 1922, C. E. Pemberton.
Humuula, 2,043 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris (from Kamuela) Mar. 1969, P. Q. Tomich; 4 dd, ex C.
familiaris (from Kamuela), Apr. 1969, PQT; 1 6, ex C. familiaris, Aug. 1969, PQT. Waipio Valley,
5m: 1 6, 1 2, under house, Nov. 1969, PQT.
HOSTS. Recorded from C. familiaris and under house.
P. simulans was not discovered in Hawaii until Wilson collected a specimen in
December 1963 at Punaluu, Hawaii (see Haas and Wilson, 1967). Earlier
investigators misdetermined specimens as Pulex irritans, and the time of original
introduction may have been many years before Pemberton’s confirmed collection of
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 15
17 December 1922 (see Haas and Wilson, 1967). Dogs brought from North, Central,
or South America were probably the agents by which P. simulans gained entrance
into the islands. |
P. simulans is much more widespread than P. irritans. There are no apparent
limitations imposed by elevation or rainfall. P. simulans ranges from near sea level up
to Humuula at 2,043 m and from around Kawaihae Bay with its very low rainfall of
less than 188 mm to Piihonua with an average annual rainfall of 6,362 mm (see Haas
and Wilson, 1967). Seasonal occurrence of P. simulans is unknown for lack of
adequate data. Sex ratio is unknown, but males are probably outnumbered by
females.
Haas and Wilson (1967) redetermined as P. simulans, two males that Pemberton
collected on 17 December 1922 and Ewing (1924) recorded as P. irritans. Recently
two more males of P. simulans from this same lot were found in the Hawaiian Sugar
Planters’ Association insect collection.
P. irritans and P. simulans females cannot be reliably separated
morphologically. Females unassociated with males are listed as Pulex sp. in the
following section.
4. PULEX SP.
Pulex sp.: Haas & Wilson, 1967, J. Med. Ent. 4:30.
KAUAI. Recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from Canis familiaris in Kaumakani, Kokee,
and Wailua.
HAWAII. Recorded by Haas and Wilson (1967) from C. familiaris in Haina, Hilo, Honaunau,
Honokaa, Humuula, Kamuela, Kukuihaele, Mountain View, Napoopoo, Niulii, Onomea, Ookala,
Paauhau, Paauilo, Pohakuloa, Puako, and Puuanahulu, and from Homo sapiens in Honokaa.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Hawi, 180 m: 1 9, ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Aug. 1968, S.
Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna. Humuula, 2,043 m: 3 99, ex C. familiaris (from Kamuela), Mar. 1969, P.
Q. Tomich; 9 99, ex C. familiaris (from Kamuela), Apr. 1969, PQT; 2 99, in dog shed soil, Apr.
1969, PQT; 10 9°, ex C. familiaris, Aug. 1969, PQT. Parker Ranch (NW slope Mauna Kea, Kemole
Gulch), 2,195 m: 2 99, ex Sus scrofa, Jan. 1971, J. G. Giffin.
HOSTS. Recorded from C. familiaris, H. auropunctatus, H. sapiens, S. scrofa,
and dog shed.
5. CTENOCEPHALIDES FELIS FELIS (BOUCHE)
(Figures 11-14)
Pulex Felis Bouché, 1835, Nova Acta Leop.-Carol. 17:505.
Ctenocephalus felis: McCoy & Bowman, 1914, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 29:1634.--Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent.
Soc. Wash. 26:210.--Pemberton, 1925, Bull. Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser.
Bull. No. 17:44.--Pemberton, 1926, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 6:221.--Swezey & Bryan, 1927, Proc.
Haw. Ent. Soc. 6:422.--Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13.-Pemberton, 1934, Proc.
Haw. Ent. Soc. 8:509.
Ctenocephalides felis felis: Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13, 14, 16-18, 33,
50.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 50:257.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1953, An Illustrated
Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural
History), vol. I, p. 152.--Hopkins, 1961, Insects of Micronesia 14:96.--Haas, 1966, J. Med. Ent.
2:321.-Krampitz, 1968, Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 19:302.--Tomich et al., 1968, Pacif. Sci.
22:362.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 199.--Haas et al.,
1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60.
Ctenocephalides felis: Stiles & Baker, 1935, Nat. Inst. Hlth. Bull. No. 163:1090.--Thompson,
1937, Ent. Mon. Mag. 73:186.--Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc.
16 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p. 14.--Rumreich & Koepke, 1945, Pub. Hith. Rep.
60:1422.--Alicata, 1947, Pacif. Sci. 1:77, 78, 80.--Cole & Koepke, 1947, Pub. Hlth. Rep. Suppl.
202:28-30, 32, 35, 36, 38-40.--Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:227.--Gross & Bonnet,
1951, Pub. Hith. Rep. 66:1542.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Kartman &
Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 13:50.--Ruhle, 1959, A Guide for the Haleakala Section
Island of Maui, Hawaii,p. 86.--Becklund, 1964, Am. J. Vet. Res. 25:1405.--Mitchell, 1964, Proc.
Haw. Ent. Soc. 18:414, 415.--Gubler, 1966, J. Med. Ent. 3:161.--Haas, 1966, J. Med. Ent.
2:321, 323, 324.--Alicata, 1967, Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 46, 74, 78, 79, 85,
86, 96, 101, 107, 108, 114.-Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Feb.
1967, Preliminary List of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 4, 30.--Haw.
Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List of
Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 3, 15.-Hinton & Dunn, 1967,
Mongooses, p. 108.--Malley & Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., p. 281.--Travis et al.,
1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 199.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man
and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54, 55, 59, 87, 90, 95, 96, 109, 110, 134, 141, 149, 150, 151,
159.--Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography, p.
178.--Tomich, 1969, J. Wildl. Mgmt. 33:576.--Haas et al., 1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60.--Kramer,
1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, pp. 133, 148.
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan.
KAUAI. Haena, 2 m: 1 6, 4 99, ex Canis familiaris, Mar. 1964, N. Wilson. Hanapepe: 12 de,
14 99, ex C. familiaris, Mar. 1964, NW & G. E. Haas. Kalaheo: 4 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964,
Mrs. Yamase; 1 9, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, 8S. Inouye; 2 99, ex C. familiaris, Dec. 1964, SI; 1 6,
1 °, ex C. familiaris, Dec. 1964, E. Au. Kilauea: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, Mar. 1964, NW. Kipu: 4 6d,
5 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, J. Hashimoto. Kokee (?State Park): 1 9, Aug. 1921, O. H.
Swezey. Koloa: 6 9°, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, Shigematsu. Lawai: 4 6d, 6 9°, ex C. familiaris,
May 1964, S. Au; 3 9°, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, N. Horita. Lihue: 13 9°, ex Felis catus, May
1964, SA. Makaweli, 2 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, S. Itakura. Omao: 8 9°, ex C. familiaris,
Apr. 1964, W. Kageyama. Puhi: 4 dd, 5 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, T. Caneles. Wailua: 9 dd, 3
9°, ex F. catus, Apr. 1964, SA; 1 6, 3 °°, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, K. Yama. Waimea Dist.: 1 6,
ex Rattus norvegicus, June 1960, J. T. Kajiwara.
OAHU. Probably recorded (as C. canis) by Van Dine (1908) in residences in Honolulu;
recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Aiea, Honolulu, Kipapa, Waimanalo, and Waipahu;
recorded by Pemberton (1934) from houses and yards in Honolulu; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by
Anonymous (1935) from rats in Honolulu; recorded by Rumreich and Koepke (1945) from
commensal rats in Honolulu; recorded by Cole and Koepke (1947b) from mongooses, R.
norvegicus, and Rattus rattus in Honolulu; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from a
mongoose in Honolulu; recorded by Mitchell (1964) from Rattus exulans in Manoa Valley.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Ewa Beach (Keahi Point): 1 ?, ex F. catus, May 1966. Hickam Air
Force Base: 4 dd, 14 99, 5 larvae, 1 egg, ex C. familiaris, Feb. 1967, R. H. McMasters. Honolulu: 1
9, Apr. 1922, Q. C. Chock; 3 dd, 7 99, ex F. catus, Mar. 1934, E. H. Bryan, Jr.; 2 99, ex Bos
taurus, Oct. 1945, E. H. Willers; 14 dd, 28 99, in house, Feb. 1960, S. Quate; 25 dd, 41 99, ex C.
familiaris, Nov. 1960, S & L. W. Quate; 2 6d, 8 99, ex C. familiaris, Mar. 1962, C. J. Lathrop; 1 9,
ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Nov. 1963, D. M. Tsuda; 1 6, ex Homo sapiens, Feb. 1964, DMT; 1 9;
2 dd, 3 P¢, ex H. sapiens, May 1964, DMT; 1 6, 5 99, ex F. catus, May 1964, H. Arakaki; 2 66, 6
9°, ex H. auropunctatus, June 1964, W. J. Voss; 1 9, ex F. catus, Aug. 1964, J. C. Harrell; 11 99,
ex F. catus, Dec. 1964, EA; 2 66, 3 29, ex F. catus, Jan. 1965, HA; 4 dd, 9 99, in dwelling, Mar.
1965, DMT; 3 6d, 5 99, ex F. catus, May 1965, JCH; 2 29, 1 larva, ex C. familiaris, Jan. 1967, HA;
1 °, ex F. catus, Mar. 1967, E. E. Gless; (Ala Moana Park): 1 9, ex H. sapiens, Nov. 1964, WJV;
(Bishop Museum grounds): 2 dd, 4 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1965, WJV; (Diamond Head Beach
Park): 1 6, 7 99, Nov. 1914; (Manoa Valley): 2 6d, 1 9, ex R. rattus, Dec. 1941, C. E. Pemberton;
1 6, 6 9Y, under house, Feb. 1946, R. H. Van Zwaluwenburg. Kailua: 1 9, ex F. catus, Apr. 1928;
larvae, eggs, ex F. catus, June 1959, D. Rainwater. Kaneohe: 1 6, ex H. auropunctatus, May 1948,
C. R. Joyce. Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station (Mokapu Point): 1 6, ex H. auropunctatus, Jan.
1967, J. H. Fitch & D. I. Hoff. Koko Head: 4 99, ex C. familiaris, “fall” 1967, P. W. Schaefer. Red
Hill Navy Reservation: 1 6, 5 99, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1967, DMT. Tantalus: 3 dd, 7 99,
under houses, Apr., May 1940, CEP; 5 99, ex 2 H. auropunctatus, July, Aug. 1963, DMT.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 17
MANANA (1.3 km off SE tip Oahu). Recorded by Tomich et al. (1968) from Oryctolagus
cuniculus. ADDITIONAL RECORD. 4 66,7 9°, ex O. cuniculus, Aug. 1968, D. L. Burckhalter.
MOLOKAI. Recorded by Swezey and Bryan (1927) from a rat at McVeigh’s cabin, near rim
of Waikolu Valley at 3,370 feet (1,028 m). ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Honomuni (E. Molokai): 1
3, 3 29, ex C. familiaris, Nov. 1964, N. Pekelo, Jr. Hoolehua: 6 °?, ex C. familiaris, Nov. 1964,
NP. Kaunakakai: 5 99, ex C. familiaris, Nov. 1964, NP; many, ex 6 C. familiaris, Feb. 1965, GEH
& P.Q. Tomich. Maunaloa: 3 dé, 4 99, ex C. familiaris, Nov. 1964, NP.
LANAI. Lanai City, 534 m: 1 9, ex C. familiaris, May 1962, GEH; 5 99°, ex Rattus sp., Apr.
1964, D. Willett; 7 dd, 14 29, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1964, DW.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Haiku, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia, Makawao,
Olinda, Puunene, Upper Paia (Paia), and Wailuku; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935)
from rats in central Maui; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats. ADDITIONAL
RECORDS. Haiku: 1 6, 2 99, ex 3 H. auropunctatus, Mar. 1967, W. Garcia. Haleakala Crater
(Kapalaoa cabin), 2,217 m: 2 99, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1964, DMT. Kaheka area: 1 9, ex H.
auropunctatus, Mar. 1967, WG. Keokea: 2 dé, 3 99, ex 2 H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1967, WG; (Kula
area): 1 ?, ex H. auropunctatus, Dec. 1966, WG. Kihei, 3 m:16, 499, ex F. catus, Jan. 1965, WG;
266,722, ex 5 H. auropunctatus, Oct. 1966, WG. Lahaina area: 19 dd, 44 99, ex 27 H.
auropunctatus, Dec. 1966, WG. Makawao, 500 m: many, ex C. familiaris, Jan. 1965, WG; 8 99, ex
F. catus, Jan. 1965, WG; 5 66, 9 99, ex 8 H. auropunctatus, Aug. 1966, WG; 1 6, ex 30 R. exulans,
Aug. 1966, WG. Olinda: 3 99, ex 3 A. auropunctatus, Mar. 1967, WG. Omaopio area, (Makawao
Dist.): 3 dd, 8 99, ex 8 A. auropunctatus, Sept., Oct. 1966, WG. Waiakoa, 915 m: 1 6d, 19,exC
familiaris , Feb. 1964, DMT. Wailuku, 101 m: many, ex F. catus, Jan. 1965, WG.
HAWAII. Recorded by McCoy and Bowman (1914) from rodents along the Hamakua Coast;
recorded by Ewing (1924) from C. familiaris and Herpestes birmanicus in Honokaa and from Felis
domestica in Waipio (?Valley) at 3,800 feet (1,159 m); recorded by Pemberton (1925) from cats
and dogs in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Ahualoa, Hilo, Honokaa,
Kalopa, Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Laupahoehoe, Lower Pohakea, Olaa (Keaau), the S Hilo Dist., and
Upper Pohakea; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from rats in Hilo and the
Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Gross and Bonnet (1951) in the Hamakua region; recorded by
Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats in Honokaa; recorded by Kartman and Lonergan (1955)
from the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Haas (1966a) from H. auropunctatus from Waipio Valley to
Paauilo in the Hamakua Dist., from Hawi to Niulii in the N Kohala Dist., and from Honaunau to
Napoopoo in the S Kona Dist., from a hollow tree (mongoose den) near Kukuihaele, from a cat
near Honokaa, from a nest probably of R. exulans near Kamuela, and from dogs; recorded by
Malley and Devick (1968) from cats, mongooses, and dogs. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Halaula
(Kohala Mill), 64 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, G. P. Mills & T. Sagucio. Hawi, 180 m: 6 66,
S 92, ex H. auropunctatus, Aug. 1968, S. Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna. Hilo (dog pound): 3 66, 12 99,
ex C. familiaris (from Puna Dist.), Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Honaunau, 335 m: 1 ?, ex C. familiaris,
May 1964, GPM & TS. Honokaa: 1 6, 1 9, ex C. familiaris, Feb. 1962, NW. Humuula, 2,043 m: 3
dd, 13 99, ex C. familiaris (from Kamuela), Mar. 1969, PQT; 8 9°, ex C. familiaris, Mar. 1969,
PQT; 4 dd, 7 99; 1 3, 7 99, ex C. familiaris, Apr. 1969, PQT; 7 36, 33 29, ex C familiaris (from
Kamuela), Apr. 1969, PQT; 1 6, 3 99; 4 99; 2 36,3 ?9, ex H. auropunctatus, May 1969, PQT; 3
22, ex C. familiaris, Aug. 1969, PQT. Kahaluu (beach park), 3 m: 1 9, ex R. exulans, Dec. 1961,
GEH. Kaimu, 6 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Kapaau (Kohala P.O.), 146 m: 1 6,
ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Kaumana, 335 m: 4 66, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM &
TS. Kawaihae (Spencer Park), 3 m: 1 9; 1 9; 1 9; ex H. auropunctatus, July, Aug. 1968, SK & EA.
Keanakolu (hunters’ cabin), 1,613 m: many, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1968, SK & EA; (Parker
Ranch Station), 1,650 m: 1 6, 3 99, ex A. auropunctatus, July 1968, SK & EA. Kukaiau Ranch
(stone corral), 1,586 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Mahukona, 3 m: 1
3, ex H. auropunctatus, Aug. 1968, SK & EA. Makahalau Camp, 1,171 m: 11 66, 41 99, ex C
familiaris, Feb. 1964, GPM; many, ex H. auropunctatus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM; 6 9°, ex 2 R.
rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Mountain View, 457 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM &
TS. Napoopoo: 3 6d, 7 9°, ex C. familiaris, Jan. 1962, NW; 2 3d, 4 29, ex F. catus, Jan. 1962,
NW. Onomea, 76 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Ookala, 91 m: 15 dé, 22 99, ex
C. familiaris, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; 1 6, ex Rattus sp., Nov. 1945, B. Brookman. Pahoa, 195 m: 2
dd, 2 99, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Palihooukapapa, 1,269 m: 1 6, ex R. norvegicus,
Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Papaikou, 62 m: 1 6; 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Puako
(beach park), 3 m: 1 6, 7 99, ex 3 H. auropunctatus, July, Aug. 1968, SK & EA. Punaluu, 3 m: 1
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
2, ex C. familiaris, Dec. 1963, NW. Puu Kihe (NE slope Mauna Kea, cabins), 2,364 m: 3 dd, 4 29.
ex H. auropunctatus, July 1968, SK & EA; (NE slope Mauna Kea, forestry plot), 2,379 m: 14,3
29, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1968, SK & EA. Puu Mali (N slope Mauna Kea, cabin), 1,982 m: 1
?, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Puuanahulu, 667 m: 1 9, ex C. familiaris, Apt.
1964, GPM & TS. Umikoa, 1,055 m: many, ex H. auropunctatus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; (Kukaiau
Ranch Headquarters), 1,067 m: 5 66, 20 9°, ex C. familiaris, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; 8 29, ex H.
auropunctatus, July 1968, SK & EA. Volcano (2.4 km NW Volcano House: Keauhou Ranch),
1,251 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Waiakeauka: 30 6d, 43 99, ex C. familiaris,
Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Waikii, 1,449 m: 2 66, 7 99, ex H. auropunctatus, Apr. 1969, PQT; (5.2
km SSE: Kilohana Girl Scout Camp), 1,708 m: 1 2, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1962, W. Graf; 1 °,
ex R. rattus, Sept., 1964, R. 1. Baldwin. Waiohinu, 351 m: 1 6, ex C. familiaris, May 1964, GPM &
TS. Waipio Valley, 5 m: 78 66, 167 °°, unde: house, Oct. 1969, PQT.
HOSTS. Recorded from bodies of B. taurus, C. familiaris, F. catus, H.
auropunctatus, H. sapiens, Mus musculus, O. cuniculus, R. exulans, R. norvegicus,
and R. rattus; in and about houses, yards, and beaches, a mongoose den, and a nest
probably of R. exulans.
The cat flea, C. felis, was first recorded by McCoy and Bowman (1914) through
specimens collected from rodents along the Hamakua Coast, Island of Hawaii. As
early as 1907, however, Van Dine (1908) in Honolulu studied fleas that he called “*. .
. the common doz and cat flea (Ctenocephalus canis). He added the footnote,
Pulex serraticeps is a synonym.” We are of the opinion that this and the other
published reports of C. canis could refer to cat fleas. Fig. 20, Plate I, of Fullaway
and Krauss (1945) is, however, of a dog flea, but without locality data.
Besides being carried ashore by man himself, C. f. felis probably entered the
islands many times since 1778 on dogs and cats brought from North America and
Europe. If dogs brought to the islands in ancient times by Polynesians from the
South Pacific were flea infested, the species was most likely Ctenocephalides orientis
(Jordan), one not yet recorded in Polynesia. On the other hand, the ubiquitous cat
flea became notorious for its outbreaks in Honolulu (Pemberton, 1934) and it is
probably the species that commonly attacks man, especially in low lying areas along
the shore. Human fleas and dog fleas are not apt to be found in such habitats, but
cat fleas thrive there. Thus, C. f. felis is likely the “ukulele” of Hawaiians of the
nineteenth century and the “Floh” or “flea” referred to by European and American
visitors in that era.
The dog, one of the true hosts of the cat flea, held an important place in early
Hawaiian civilization (Luomala, 1960). In the subtropical environment well
populated with natives and their dogs, the cat flea population could doubtless
increase to one of extraordinary size. Early in the twentieth century the dog was
definitely identified as an important host of C. canis (probably C. f. felis). In 1907
Van Dine, a professional entomologist, was engaged in the investigation of outbreaks
of these fleas in Honolulu (Smith, 1908). Van Dine (1908) mentioned that several
outbreaks of the ‘“.. . . common dog and cat flea . . .” occurred in residences, and he
commented that homeless cats and dogs occurred in and about the city. One of two
particular infestations was traced to dogs sheltering under a house; the other case
concerned a family returning after an absence to find their house, yard, and
outbuildings infested.
The cat flea is the most widespread flea in the islands. It has no obvious range
limitations imposed by either elevation or rainfall. No true hosts from the
uppermost slopes of the high mountains, however, have been examined for fleas.
The maximum elevation record is 2,379 m in the Puu Kihe Forestry Plot on the
northeast slope of Mauna Kea. Extremes of average annual rainfall at collecting
localities on the Island of Hawaii are less than 188 mm near Kawaihae Bay to about
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 19
4,826 mm at Kaumana.
Seasonal occurrence of C. f. felis on female mongooses was rather stable in the
Hamakua District where cat flea-mongoose relationships were studied for three years
(Haas, 1966a). Month-to-month deviations from the mean of 1.5 fleas per female
mongoose were slight. With male mongooses, however, the mean was 4.3 during the
mongoose breeding season, December-July, and 2.4 during the nonbreeding season,
August-November. Sex ratio on mongooses was relatively stable at about 28% males.
In Honolulu, Cole and Koepke (1947b) found that the infestation of R. norvegicus
was higher in drier than in wetter months.
Hosts of C. f. felis are many. True hosts include cat, dog, mongoose, and rabbit.
Eskey (1934) did not specify on which island(s) he found infested mice and
mongooses. He was first to suggest that mongooses were natural (true) hosts.
Additional data by Cole and Koepke (1947b) and Haas (1966a) support his
suggestion.
The cat flea-rabbit relationship discovered on Manana Island by Tomich et al.
(1968) is of particular interest regarding adoption of new hosts by fleas in historical
times. Evidently, this unique flea-host relationship came about only in isolation
from carnivores.
6. CTENOCEPHALIDES CANIS (CURTIS)
(Figures 15-18)
Pulex canis Curtis, 1826, Brit. Ent. 3:114.
2Ctenocephalus canis: Van Dine, 1908, Ann. Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. for 1907, pp. 35, 48.--Van
Dine & Norgaard, 1908, Proc. Haw. Live Stock Breeders’ Assoc. 5th Ann. Meet., 1907, p.
70.--Van Dine, 1909, Ann. Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. for 1908, p. 37.-McCoy & Bowman,
1914, Pub. Hith. Rep. 29:1634.--Bryan, 1915, Natural History of Hawaii, p. 401.
2Pulex serraticeps: Van Dine, 1908, Ann. Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. for 1907, p. 35.
?Pulex canis: Bryan, 1915, Natural History of Hawaii, p. 401.
?Ctenocephalides canis: Fullaway & Krauss, 1945, Common Insects of Hawaii, p. 410, pl. I, fig. 20
(fig. appears to be of C. canis).
Ctenocephalides canis: Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, p. 87 (refers to lack
of proof of presence in Hawaii).--Haas et al., 1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60.--Teeter, 1971, Univ. N.
Iowa Quart. 3:16 (photomicrograph of head and thorax of female specimen from Hawaii).
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan in more temperate regions.
OAHU. Recorded (questionable) by Van Dine (1908) in residences in Honolulu.
HAWAII. Recorded (questionable) by McCoy and Bowman (1914) from rodents along the
Hamakua Coast. ADDITIONAL RECORDS (confirmed). Humuula, 2,043 m: 1 6, abandoned dog
shed, Aug. 1968, S. Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna; 1 9, ex Canis familiaris, Apr. 1969, P. Q. Tomich.
HOSTS. Recorded from C. familiaris and an abandoned dog shed; questionably
from Felis catus, Homo sapiens, rodents, and in and about houses.
Confusion of the dog flea, C. canis, and Ctenocephalides felis felis by several
authors in the first half of the twentieth century is not unique for the Hawaiian
Islands. These old reports of dog fleas will remain questionable unless preserved
specimens of the fleas referred to by the authors are located and restudied.
We expected that if a resident population of dog fleas existed, it would be on
the upper slopes of the higher mountains, for C. canis is not a tropical or subtropical
flea. Populations of dog fleas do not persist near sea level on Pacific islands in the
tropics. Hopkins (1961) recorded three specimens from a dog on Guam; however,
these specimens were reexamined by Wilson (1972) and determined to be
Ctenocephalides orientis.
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
As we have confirmed the occurrence of the dog flea in only one locality,
namely Humuula, Hawaii, we can only roughly estimate the minimum elevation at
which this species can maintain a population. Perhaps it is not far below 2,000 m.
Regardless, the high mobility of its host, especially with the aid of man, could
account for occasional collections near sea level. Pemberton (1943) stated that dog
fleas are frequently introduced on imported dogs. The figure labeled C. canis by
Fullaway and Krauss (1945) appears to be a dog flea. Therefore, some authors may
have had specimens of this species, but we have not located any of them. We believe
that the two records from Humuula are the first from the resident C. canis
population in the usual range of that species. As elevations exceed 2,000 m on Maui,
dog fleas also may be established there.
7. XENOPSYLLA CHEOPIS (ROTHSCHILD)
(Figures 19-22)
Pulex cheopis Rothschild, 1903, Ent. Mon. Mag. 39:85.
Loemopsylla cheopis: McCoy & Bowman, 1914, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 29:1634.
Xenopsylla cheopis [ ?partim] : Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:209, 210.
Xenopsylla cheopis: Pemberton, 1925, Bull. Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull.
No. 17:44, 45.--Pemberton, 1926, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 6:221.--Barnum, 1930, Haw. Planters’
Rec. 34:422.--Jordan, 1932, Novit. Zool. 38:266.--Eskey, (in Grubbs), 1933, J. Pan-Pacif. Res.
Inst. 8:8, 9.--McMullen, 1933, Bull. Mens. Office Internat. Hyg. Pub. 25:1931.--Eskey, 1934,
Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:12-45, 48-54, 60-62, 69.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth. Rep.
50:255-57.--Wu (in Wu et al.), 1936, Plague: A Manual for Medical and Public Health Workers,
p. 275.--Wu et al., 1936, Plague: A Manual for Medical and Public Health Workers, p.
530.-Thompson, 1937, Ent. Mon. Mag. 73:186.-Doolittle, 1941, Ann. Internal Med.
14:2095.--Mumford, 1942, Am. Sci. 30:216.--Carter, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:296.--Pemberton,
1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.-Mumford & Mohr, 1944, Am. J. Trop. Med. 24 (Suppl.):
14.--Simmons et al., 1944, Global Epidemiology, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 289.--Cole, 1945, Pub. Hlth.
Rep. 60:1339-42.--Hampton, 1945, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1366.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw.
Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p. 14.--Rumreich & Koepke, 1945, Pub. Hlth. Rep.
60: 1422-27.--Augustson, 1947, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:33, 34, 36.--Cole & Koepke, 1947,
Pub. Hith. Rep. Suppl. 202:20, 25, 26, 28-31, 35-41, 44.--Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc.
13:226.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 66:1542.--Mohr, 1951, Am. J. Trop. Med.
31:357-59.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Hirst, 1953, The Conquest of Plague, p.
182.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1953, An Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of
Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History), vol. I, p. 259.--Norris et al.,
1953, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 68:803.--Pollitzer, 1954, Plague, pp. 54, 371, 390, 489.--Kartman &
Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 13:50, 56, 63.--Link, 1955, Pub. Hlth. Monogr. No.
26:76.--Kartman et al., 1956, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 14:681, 682, 687, 694.--Stark & Kartman,
1957, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 6:707.-von Bormann (in Rodenwalt & Jusatz), 1961, World
Atlas of Epidemic Diseases, pt. III, pp. 71, 73, 74.--Gross, 1961, Proc. Ninth Pacif. Sci. Congr.
Pacif. Sci. Assoc. 19:53.--Hopkins, 1961, Insects of Micronesia 14:103.--Raettig et al. (in
Rodenwaldt & Jusatz), 1961, World Atlas of Epidemic Diseases, pt. III, pp. 25, 26.--Mitchell,
1964, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 18:414, 415.--Haas, 1965, J. Med. Ent. 2:75-82.--Alicata, 1967,
Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 43,78, 79, 85, 86, 107, 108, 113, 114.--Haw. Ent.
Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Feb. 1967, Preliminary List of Common
Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 16, 46.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common
Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects
and Organisms, pp. 8, 23.--Hinton & Dunn, 1967, Mongooses, p. 108.--Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif.
Interchange Proc., pp. 138-40, 143.--Malley & Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., pp.
273-76, 278, 281.--Muirhead-Thomson, 1968, Ecology of Insect Vector Populations, pp.
107-109.--Samarina et al., 1968, Zool. Zh. 47:266.--Tomich et al., 1968, Pacif. Sci.
22:363.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 204.--Alicata,
1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54, 55, 95, 96, 108, 110, 150, 151, 157,
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 21
158, 159.-Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography, pp. 166,
178.--Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, p. 133.
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan.
KAUAI. 1 2, ex 7 Mus musculus, July 1960, J. T. Kajiwara; 7 dd, 6 29, ex 6 of 167 Rattus
exulans, July, Sept., Oct. 1960, Apr. 1961, JTK; 4 dd, 3 99, ex 3 or more of 78 Rattus norvegicus,
Feb., Oct. 1960, Jan. 1961, JTK; 1 6; 1 9, ex 55 Rattus rattus, Feb., July 1960, JTK. Kawaihau
Dist.: 2 dé, 1 2, ex 2 of 35 R. exulans, Mar. 1961, JTK; 1 ?, ex 23 R. norvegicus, Mar. 1961, JTK.
Koloa Dist.: 1 6, ex 5M. musculus, May 1961, JTK; 4 dd, 1 °, ex 3 of 65 R. exulans, May 1961,
JTK. Waimea Dist.: 3 6d, 3 22, ex 2 of 18 M. musculus, July, Dec. 1960, JTK; 19 dd, 20 29, ex 78
R. exulans, June, Dec. 1960, June 1961, JTK; 36 dd, 37 99, ex 103 R. norvegicus, June, Dec.
1960, June 1961, JTK; 6 66, 5 99, ex 7 of 73 R. rattus, June 1960, June 1961, JTK.
OAHU. Recorded by Pemberton (1925) from rats in Honolulu; recorded by Eskey (1934)
from rats in Aiea, Honolulu, Kipapa, Waimanalo, and Waipahu, and from M. musculus; recorded
(Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from rats in Honolulu; recorded by Doolittle (1941) from
(R.) norvegicus, alexandrinus, and rattus in Honolulu; recorded by Cole (1945) from rats in
Honolulu; recorded by Rumreich and Koepke (1945) from commensal rats in Honolulu; recorded
by Cole and Koepke (1947a) from rodents in Honolulu; recorded by Cole and Koepke (1947b)
from Rattus hawaiiensis, R. norvegicus, R. rattus, and mongooses in Honolulu; recorded by Cole
and Koepke (1947c) from rodents in Honolulu; recorded (Cole and Koepke, 1947b) by Mohr
(1951) from Norway, roof, and Hawaiian rats in Honolulu; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild
(1953) from brown rat in Wahiaivu (Wahiawa); recorded (Mohr, 1951) by Pollitzer (1954) from
Norway rats in Honolulu; recorded by Mitchell (1964) from R. exulans, R. norvegicus, and R.
rattus in Manoa Valley (Honolulu). ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Honolulu: 1 9, in dwelling, Jan.
1932, C. E. Pemberton; 1 6, ex R. rattus, Feb. 1941, CEP; 1 ?, ex R. norvegicus, July 1948, C. R.
Joyce; 2 66, 5 99, ex R. norvegicus, Jan. 1953, CRJ; (Kaimuki): 2 6d, 1 9,-ex Rattus sp., Apr.
1940, CEP; 3 9°, ex M. musculus, Aug. 1942, Y. Kondo; (Manoa Valley): 3 dd, 3 99, ex R. rattus,
Dec. 1940, Dec. 1941, CEP. Tantalus: 1 ?, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1963, D. M. Tsuda & W. J. Voss.
MANANA (1.3 km off SE tip of Oahu). Recorded (Wilson, pers. com.) by Haas (1965a)
from M. musculus; recorded by Tomich et al. (1968) from M. musculus and Oryctolagus cuniculus.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1933) from rats in the Makawao Dist.; recorded by Eskey
(1934) from rats in Haiku, Kahului, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia, Makawao, Olinda, Puunene, Upper
Paia (Paia), and Wailuku, from M. musculus and man; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous
(1935) from rats in central Maui; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Bonnet (1948) from rodents in
Makawao; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats. ADDITIONAL RECORDS.
Keokea (Kula area): 1 6, ex 6 Herpestes auropunctuatus, Dec. 1966, W. Garcia. Lahaina area: 1 °,
ex 17 R. exulans, Dec. 1966, WG; 2 6, 4 99, ex 16 R. rattus, Dec. 1966, WG. Puunene: 3 dd, 8
29, ex R. rattus, May 1934, H. Stein.
HAWAII. Recorded by McCoy and Bowman (1914) from rodents along the Hamakua Coast;
recorded (erroneously, at least in part) by Ewing (1924) from R. rattus and R. norvegicus in
Honokaa; recorded by Pemberton (1925) from rats in the Hamakua Dist. and from a mongoose in
Honokaa; recorded (Pemberton, 1925) by Barnum (1930) from rats at Honokaa (Hamakua Dist.);
recorded by Eskey (1933) from rats in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in
Ahualoa, Hilo, Honokaa, Kalopa, Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Laupahoehoe, Lower Pohakea, Olaa
(Keaau), Onomea, and Pepeekeo, from M. musculus in the Hilo sector and the Hamakua Dist., and
from man; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from rats in Hilo and. the Hamakua
Dist.; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Hampton (1945) from rodents in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded
(Eskey, 1934) by Bonnet (1948) from rodents in Hamakua; recorded by Gross and Bonnet (1951)
in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats in Honakaa
(Honokaa); recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Pollitzer (1954) from the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by
Kartman and Lonergan (1955) from R. rattus, and R. hawaiiensis in Kaunamano Gulch and
Paauhau, field 1, and from R. norvegicus in Kaunamano Gulch; recorded by Kartman et al. (1956)
from around Honokaa; recorded by Gross (1961) from R. hawaiiensis, R. norvegicus and all other
rodent species present in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Haas (1965a) from M. musculus, R.
exulans, R. norvegicus, and R. rattus in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Devick (1968) from R.
norvegicus; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from R. norvegicus and other rodents.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Captain Cook (4.8 km S), 464 m: 2 dd, 1 @, ex R. norvegicus, Feb.
1963, G. E. Haas. Halaula (Kohala Mill), 76 m: 1 9, ex R. exulans, Jan. 1962, GEH & T. Ishinaga.
22 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Honokaa: 1 6; 1 9, ex R. norvegicus, Jan., Nov. 1924, CEP; (3 km SW: Ahualoa Homesteads), 610
m: 15 6d, 12 99, ex R. norvegicus nest with rat, Apr. 1963, G. P. Mills & T. Sagucio; (2.7 km SE),
412 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex R. exulans nest, Feb. 1964, W. Mills. Ka Lae (South Cape): 1 6, ex M.
musculus, July 1952, W. Graf. Kawaihae, 3 m: 2 dd, 3 ?9, ex 4 R. rattus, July, Aug. 1968, S.
Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna; (2 km SE: Makiki Nursery), 72 m: 2 99, ex 11 R. rattus, July, Aug.
1968, SK & EA; (Spencer Park), 3 m: 1 6, 5 99, ex R. exulans, July, Aug. 1968, SK & EA;
Kukuihaele, 223 m: 2 99, ex R. norvegicus nest with rats, Oct. 1961, N. Wilson; 244 m: 1 ex.
exulans nest with rats, Aug. 1963, WM; 1 4, ex R. exulans nest, June 1964, WM; (0.8 km NE:
camp 104), 171 m: 1 6, 4 99, ex M. musculus nest with mice, Jan. 1962, NW; (1.3 km NE), 120
m: 1 6, ex R. ?exulans nest, Aug. 1962, GEH; (1.9 km ESE), 130 m: 3 dd, ex M. musculus nest,
Aug. 1963, WM; (1.4 km ESE), 335 m: 1 6, 3 99, ex R. exulans nest, June 1964, GPM & TS.
Kupaahu, 15 m: 1 9, ex Canis familiaris, May 1964, GPM & TS. Mahukona, 8 m: 5 de, 4 99, ex 2
R. rattus, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI; (Kapaa Beach Park), 3 m: 9 dd, 6 99, ex 1 of 15 M. musculus,
July, Aug. 1968, SK & EA. Makahalau Camp, 1,171 m: 1 6, 2 99, ex 2 R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH
& GPM. Makapala, 67 m: 1 9, ex M. musculus, Feb. 1962, GEH & TI; (0.5 km SSW), 146 m: 1 &,
ex M. musculus, Feb. 1962, GEH & TI; (Pololu Valley overlook), 126 m: 1 6, ex M. musculus, Jan.
1962, GEH & TI; 1 6, 1 2, ex R. exulans, Jan. 1962, GEH & NW. Paauilo (5.6 km SE), 579 m: 1 d,
1 9,ex R. exulans nest, Feb. 1964, WM. Puu Waawaa (ranch headquarters), 842 m: 1 °, ex M.
musculus, Sept. 1963, GEH & GPM; 1 4, 2 ?9, ex 1 of 11 R. rattus, Aug. 1968, SK & EA.
Puuanahulu, 665 m: many, ex many M. musculus, Sept. 1963, GEH & GPM. Upolu Point (Coast
Guard Station), 15 m: 2 66, 6 99, ex 19 M. musculus, Aug. 1968, SK & EA. Wainaia Gulch (N
Kohala Dist.), 38 m: 1 9, ex R. exulans, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI. Waipio, 8 m: 1 9, ex R. rattus, Nov.
1961, GEH. Waipio Valley (E rim), 518 m: 1 °, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1962, SK.
HOSTS. Recorded from bodies and nests of M. musculus, R. exulans, and R.
norvegicus; from bodies of C. familiaris, H. auropunctatus, Homo sapiens, O.
cuniculus, and R. rattus; from dwelling.
The Oriental rat flea, X. cheopis, was first recorded by McCoy and Bowman
(1914) through specimens collected from rodents trapped along the Hamakua Coast,
Island of Hawaii. X. cheopis very probably entered the islands on R. norvegicus and
R. rattus that escaped from ocean vessels in 1899 and the early 1900’s as the last
pandemic of plague would suggest, but introductions earlier in the nineteenth
century are highly probable. Islands where this flea most likely will be discovered are
Midway, Lanai, and Molokai.
Although occasional specimens are found on rodents and in subterranean nests
far from buildings, the Oriental rat flea is most abundant on R. norvegicus and in its
nests in or under buildings. This flea thrives in extremely dry areas such as Kawaihae
(less than 188 mm average annual rainfall) where Xenopsylla vexabilis is not found.
Shelter from rainfall is favorable regardless of elevation (temperature), at least up to
an elevation of 1,171 m at Makahalau. At lower elevations buildings may also afford
necessary shelter from excessive heat.
Our data are insufficient to indicate seasonal occurrence of X. cheopis on hosts
and in their nests. Eskey (1934) reported that the highest infestations of rats caught
inside and under buildings were during April-September; the highest infestations of
rats caught over 15 m from buildings were during July-December. In Honolulu, Cole
and Koepke (1947b) found that abundance on R. norvegicus and R. rattus had a
slight negative correlation with temperature. |
The sex ratio of X. cheopis on trapped rats received considerable study. Eskey
(1934) reported 52% females for his entire study. In winter when infestation was
lowest, females increased to 58%. Therefore, believing no change occurred in the sex
ratio in the total population, he reasoned that one must assume females are not
closely attached to hosts in summer. Cole (1945) studied data from X. cheopis and
rats in Honolulu (and three North America cities) and concluded that X. cheopis
males are more sensitive than females to day-to-day temperature changes. The males
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 23
shift to rats at high temperatures and from them at low temperatures. Meanwhile,
the females remain on their hosts in relatively constant numbers. Therefore, he
concluded that an index based on females only may have a more stable relationship
to the total flea population.
R. norvegicus is clearly the most heavily infested of the four true hosts of X.
cheopis, and that it has attributes of a very suitable host was confirmed
experimentally (Haas, 1965a). Thus, the declining population of Norway rats in the
Hamakua District in the early 1960’s may be a factor in the scarcity of X. cheopis as
compared with conditions in Eskey’s (1934) time. He indicated that 17 to 18% of all
fleas were X. cheopis and about 34% were X. vexabilis. In the early 1960’s X.
cheopis was seldom found, even in villages. Eskey’s (1934) studies were made during
a period of subnormal rainfall and he thought this had a favorable effect on the
prevalence of X. cheopis. Subnormal rainfall also was a feature of the early 1960’s
(Haas, 1965b).
On Hawaii, the cane-growing area west of Pololu Valley has a climate similar to
that in the enzootic plague area of the Hamakua District; however, in February 1962
X. cheopis was the most abundant species of rodent flea despite the apparent
absence of R. norvegicus. Eskey (1934) reported that except for the Kula zone,
central Maui was free of R. norvegicus, yet X. cheopis was ubiquitous and in six of
nine other trapping zones, it was the most abundant rodent flea on the other rats as
a group, that is, R. exulans and R. rattus pooled. Furthermore, in the absence of
tats, house mice, despite their inferiority to rats as hosts (Haas, 1965a) can serve as
suitable hosts as proved by the house mouse-Oriental rat flea association on Manana
Island (Tomich et al., 1968). House mice on Manana have a higher infestation of X.
cheopis than house mice anywhere else in the Hawaiian Islands.
Eskey (1934) reported that Oriental rat fleas were somewhat more prevalent on
young rats than adults and were more prevalent on females than males. However, he
pooled data in such a way that it is impossible to know if all three species of rats
were hosts in all localities. He did not specify on which island(s) the mongooses were
infested. The record of man as a host comes from his inference based on
epidemiological evidence from the enzootic plague areas on Maui and Hawaii. He
believed that X. cheopis was responsible for nearly all cases of human plague.
Records of X. cheopis before Eskey’s (1934) study are questionable as this flea
was confused with X. vexabilis prior to the latter’s discovery. For example, we have
examined seven of the eight specimens Ewing (1924) recorded as_X. cheopis, and all
are X. vexabilis. Sometime after Eskey’s study in 1932-33, Pemberton, who
collected the eight specimens determined by Ewing (1924) in Honokaa in 1922 and
1923, correctly redetermined the seven remaining in the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’
Association collection in Honolulu. Specimens collected by Pemberton in 1924 were
not listed by Ewing (1924). In January 1924 Pemberton collected a male X. cheopis
from R. norvegicus in Honokaa. The specimen is in the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’
Association collection.
8. XENOPSYLLA VEXABILIS JORDAN
(Figures 23-27)
Xenopsylla vexabilis Jordan, 1925, Novit. Zool. 32:100.
Xenopsylla cheopis [unum non vidi] : Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:209, 210.
Xenopsylla hawaiiensis: Jordan, 1932, Novit. Zool. 38:264-66, figs. 19, 20.--Eskey (in Grubbs),
1933, J. Pan-Pacif. Res. Inst. 8:8.--Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hith. Bull 213:13-18, 26, 35-45, 52-55,
58, 60, 61, 69.--[llingworth, 1934, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 8:361.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hith.
Rep. 50:256, 257.-Mumford, 1936, Ecology 17:149.--Svihla, 1936, Murrelet 17:12.--Wu (in
Wu et al.), 1936, Plague: A Manual for Medical and Public Health Workers, p. 275.--Wu et al.,
24
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
1936, Plague: A Manual for Medical and Public Health Workers, p. 530.--Thompson, 1937, Ent.
Mon. Mag. 73:186, 187.--Hegner et al., 1938, Parasitology, p. 638.--Adamson, 1939, Bishop
Mus. Bull. 159:59, 68.--Herms, 1939, Medical Entomology, 3rd ed., p. 417.--Mumford, 1942,
Am. Sci. 30:216.-Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.--Simmons et al., 1944, Global
Epidemiology, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 289.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet.
1940-41, p. 14.--Augustson, 1947, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:33-36.--Chabaud, 1947, Ann.
Parasit. Hum. Comp. 22:360, 366.--Cole & Koepke, 1947, Pub. Hlth. Rep. Suppl. 202:28,
29.--Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:226.--Zimmerman, 1948, Insects of Hawaii, vol. I,
Intro., p. 69.--Brumpt, 1949, Précis de Parasitologie, 6th ed., vol. II, p. 1305 .-Chandler, 1949,
Introduction to Parasitology, 8th ed., pp. 594, 606.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep.
66:1542.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Pollitzer, 1952, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 7:249,
250.-loff & Scalon, 1954, Keys to the Fleas of Eastern Siberia, the Far East, and Adjoining
Regions, pp. 55, 148, fig. 86g.--Link, 1955, Pub. Hlth. Monogr. No. 26:76.-Kartman et al.
1956, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 14:682.--Rosicky, 1957, Blechy--Aphaniptera, p. 195, fig.
61E.--Chandler & Read, 1961, Introduction to Parasitology, 10th ed., pp. 646, 656.--Raettig et
al. (in Rodenwaldt & Jusatz), 1961, World Atlas of Epidemic Diseases, pt. II, pp. 25,
26.--Meyer (in Hull), 1963, Diseases Transmitted from Animals to Man, Sth ed., p. 569.--Cheng,
1964, The Biology of Animal Parasites, p. 571.--Jordan (in Smart), 1965, Insects of Medical
Importance, 4th ed., p. 238.--Muirhead-Thomson, 1968, Ecology of Vector Populations, p.
108.--Travis et al., 1968, U. S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 204.
Xenopsylla awaiiensis (sic): McMullen, 1933, Bull. Mens. Office Internat. Hyg. Pub. 25:1931.
Xenopsylla vexabilis hawaiiensis: Jordan, 1936, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 61:184, 185.--Costa Lima
& Hathaway, 1946, Monogr. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz No. 4:104.--Pollitzer, 1952, Bull. Wid. Hlth.
Org. 7:288.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1953, An Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild
Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History), vol. I, pp. 244,
245, 248, 269, 270, 271, figs. 274, 326, 327, pl. 40C.--Kartman, 1954, J. Parasit. 40:574, 575,
578.-Macchiavello, 1954, J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 57:7, 222, 223, 243.--Pollitzer, 1954, Plague, pp.
333, 334, 371.--Kartman & Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 13:50, 51, 56, 61, 63,
66.--Kartman et al., 1956, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 14:681-85, 687-97, 699-703.--Kartman et al.,
1956, Exptl. Parasit. 5:435-40.--Stark & Kartman, 1957, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
6:707-11.--Kartman et al., 1958, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 70:689, 690.--Pollitzer, 1960, Bull. Wld.
Hith. Org. 23:361.--Pratt & Stojanovich (in U.S. Dept. Health, Education, and Welfare, Pub.
Hith. Serv., (Nat.) Com. Dis. Center, 1966, 1967 reprint, and 1969 Pub. Hith. Serv. Pub. No.
1955), 1960, Pictorial Keys to Arthropods, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of Public Health
Significance, p. 172, 2 figs.--Gross, 1961, Proc. Ninth Pacif. Sci. Congr. Pacif. Sci. Assoc.
19:53.-Herms & James, 1961, Medical Entomology, 5th ed., p. 406.--Pollitzer & Meyer (in
May), 1961, Studies in Disease Ecology, pp. 459, 460.-Horsfall, 1962, Medical Entomology, p.
100.--Haas, 1965, J. Med. Ent. 2:78.--Haas, 1965, J. Med. Ent. 2:315.--Smit, 1965, Trans. R.
Soc. New Zealand, Zool. 7:34.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1966, An Illustrated Catalogue of the
Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History), vol. IV,
p. 541.--Krishnamurthy (in Smith), 1966, Insect Colonization and Mass Production, p.
74.--Alicata, 1967, Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 43, 78-80, 86, 107, 108, 112,
114.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 204.--Alicata, 1969,
Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, p. 110.--Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis
and notational bibliography, p. 186.-Klein, 1971, Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M. Ent. Méd. Parasit.
: i ar ae & Stojanovich (in Macy & Berntzen), 1971, Laboratory Guide to Parasitology, p.
, 2 figs.
Xenopsylla vexabilis: Augustson, 1947, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:33-36, figs. 1a, c, d.--Bonnet,
1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:226.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth, Rep.
66:1542.--Kartman et al., 1956, Bull, Wid. Hith. Org. 14:682.--Chandler & Read, 1961,
Introduction to Parasitology, 10th ed., pp. 646, 656.--Haas, 1965, J. Med. Ent. 2:75-82.--Smit,
1965, Trans. R. Soc. New Zealand, Zool. 7:34, 44.--Haas, 1966, J. Med. Ent. 2:393,
394.--Hopkins & Rothschild, 1966, An Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of
Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natual History), vol. IV, p. 541.-Haw. Ent. Soc.
Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List of Common Names
of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 1, 23.--Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., pp.
139-40.--Malley & Devick, 1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., pp. 273-75, 278, 281,
282.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54, 55, 96, 98, 110, 150, 151,
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 25
156, 159.-Haas, 1969, Pacif. Sci. 23:70, 73, 76-80.--James & Harwood, 1969, Herms’s Medical
Entomology, p. 308.--Tomich, 1969, Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational
bibliography, pp. 178, 186.--Traub et al., 1970, Papua New Guinea Med. J. 13:63.--Haas et al.,
1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:60, 66, 71.--Klein, 1971, Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M. Ent. Méd. Parasit. 9:229-30.
Xenopsylla [ ?hawaiiensis] : Jordan, 1950, Bull. Wid. Hlth. Org. 2:599.
Xenopsylla vexalis (sic): Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Feb. 1967,
Preliminary List of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, pp. 1, 46.
Xenopsylla hawaiensis (sic): Muirhead-Thomson, 1968, Ecology of Insect Vector Populations, pp.
107, 109.
Xenopsylla vexabilis [hawaiiensis] : Holland, 1969, Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. No. 61:10.
Xenopsylla vesabilis (sic) hawaiiensis: Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, p. 133.
DISTRIBUTION. Southeast Asia (Thailand, Cambodia, and Philippines),
Australia (Franklin Island, South Australia, and Queensland), New Guinea, New
Zealand (Hen and Little Barrier Islands), Kermadec Islands (Raoul Island), Hawaiian
Islands.
KAUAI. 18 6, 4 99, ex 3 of 141 Rattus exulans, Feb., Mar. 1960, J. T. Kajiwara. Kawaihau
Dist.: 3 66, ex 1 of 63 R. exulans, May 1960, JTK. Koloa Dist.: 3 dd, 1 ?, ex 4 of 78 R. exulans,
Apr. 1960, JTK. Waimea Dist.: 3 29, ex 43 R. exulans, June 1960, JTK; 1 d, 5 29, ex 90 Rattus
norvegicus, June, Dec. 1960, JTK.
OAHU. Recorded by Jordan (1932) from rats 9 miles (14.5 km) from Honolulu on the
opposite side of the island; recorded by Eskey (1933) from rats in Aiea, Waipahu, and windward
side of the Pali; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Aiea, Kipapa, Waimanalo, and Waipahu,
and from Mus musculus; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from field rodents;
recorded (Jordan, 1932) by Herms (1939) from rats 9 miles (14.5 km) from Honolulu on the
opposite side of the island; recorded by Cole and Koepke (1947b) from Rattus in Honolulu;
recorded (Jordan, 1932) by Herms and James (1961) from rats about 9 miles (14.5 km) from |
Honolulu on the opposite side of the island. ADDITIONAL RECORD. Honolulu (Palolo Valley):
3 66, 1 2, ex Rattus rattus, Apr. 1923, O. H. Swezey.
MAUI. Recorded by Jordan (1932) from rats, especially Rattus hawaiiensis; recorded by
Eskey (1933) from rats in the Makawao Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Haiku,
Kahului, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia, Makawao, Olinda, Puunene, Upper Paia (Paia), and Wailuku,
and from M. musculus; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from field rats in central
Maui; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Wu (1936) in central Maui; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Bonnet
(1948) from rodents in Makawao; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from rats and
Rattus [exulans] hawaiiensis; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Link (1955) from domestic rodents;
recorded (Eskey, 1934, Jordan, 1932) by Kartman et al. (1956) from R. hawaiiensis.
HAWAII. Recorded (as X. cheopis) by Ewing (1924) from R. norvegicus and R. rattus in
Honokaa; recorded by Jordan (1932) from rats, especially R. hawaiiensis, in Honokaa; recorded by
Eskey (1933) from Norway and other rats in the Hamakua Dist. and from rats in the area from
Hilo to Laupahoehoe; recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Ahualoa, Hilo, Honokaa, Kalopa,
Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Laupahoehoe, Lower Pohakea, Olaa (Keaau), Pepeekeo, and Upper Pohakea,
and from M. musculus; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Anonymous (1935) from field rats in the
Hamakua Dist.; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Wu (1936) in the Kamakua (sic) Dist.; recorded
(Eskey, 1934) by Bonnet (1948) from rodents in Hamakua; recorded by Gross and Bonnet (1951)
from the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Hopkins and Rothschild (1953) from Hilo and from rats in
Honokaa; recorded (Kartman and Lonergan, 1955) by Kartman (1954) from R. hawaiiensis, R.
norvegicus, and R. rattus, in Kaunamano Gulch, Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Kartman and
Lonergan (1955) from R. hawaiiensis, R. norvegicus, R. rattus, and their nests in Kaunamano
Gulch and from R. hawaiiensis and R. rattus in Paauhau, field 1; recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Link
(1955) from domestic rodents in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Kartman et al. (1956) from
around Honokaa and from R. hawaiiensis in the plague-enzootic region, Hamakua Dist.; recorded
by Stark and Kartman (1957) from nests of R. hawaiiensis, R. norvegicus, and R. rattus in the
Honokaa area and from R. hawaiiensis; recorded by Gross (1961) from all rodent species present
in the Hamakua Dist. including R. hawaiiensis and R. norvegicus; recorded by Meyer (1963) from
field rats; recorded by Haas (1965a) from R. exulans, R. norvegicus, R. rattus, and M. musculus in
the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Haas (1965b) from nests of M. musculus and R. exulans near
Kukuihaele; recorded by Haas (1966b) from M. musculus, R. exulans, and their nests near
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Kukuihaele; recorded by Devick (1968) from R. exulans; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968)
from R. exulans and other rodents; recorded by Haas (1969) from M. musculus, R. exulans, and
their nests near Kukuihaele and from R. exulans nests in other localities from 152 to 305 m in the
enzootic plague area, Hamakua Dist. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Haina (1.2 km NW), 60 m: 1 6, 2
29, ex R. exulans nest, June 1964, W. Mills. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (Kipuka Nene), 915
m: 1 6, 1 9, ex R. rattus, Dec. 1961, G. E. Haas. Honokaa: 2 dd, 1 9, ex 2 R. norvegicus, Nov.,
Dec. 1922, C. E. Pemberton; 1 9; 1 9, ex R. norvegicus, Feb., Mar. 1923, CEP; 3 6d, 3 99, ex 3 R.
norvegicus, Nov. 1924, CEP; 1 9; 1 9, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1922, Feb. 1923, CEP; Honomu, 76 m: 5
dd, 9 99, ex R. exulans nest, Jan. 1967, J. Kanaeholo. Kaapahu Homesteads (Hamakua Dist.), 584
m: 1 9; 1 9; 1 9, ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Jan., Aug. 1962, Dec. 1963, S. Kaaekuahiwi.
Kahaluu (beach park), 3 m: 1 6, ex R. exulans, Dec. 1961, GEH. Kalopa Gulch (Hamakua Dist.),
244 m: 1 9, ex H. auropunctatus, May 1964, SK. Kapulena, 464 m: 5 dd, 4 99, ex 6 H.
auropunctatus, Dec. 1961, June, Aug. 1962, SK. Kohala Mill area, 37 m: 1 6, 4 99, ex M.
musculus nest with mice, Apr. 1966, A. Ramos; 42 66, 60 9°, ex 5 R. exulans nests with 18 rats,
Apr. 1966, AR; (1.7 km SW), 326 m: 6 dd, ex 2 R. exulans, Jan., Feb. 1962, GEH & T. Ishinaga.
Kukaiau Ranch (Iolehachae Camp), 1,915 m: 2 dd, ex R. rattus, Mar. 1964, G. P. Mills & T.
Sagucio. Kukuihaele, 223 m: 17 dd, 42 99, ex R. norvegicus nest with rats, Oct. 1961, N. Wilson;
268 m: 1 6, ex H. auropunctatus, Aug. 1960, SK; (3.1 km SSE), 488 m:26 66,7 9°, ex R. exulans.
nest, June 1961, GEH; (3 km SSW: Hamakua Forest Reserve), 564 m: 1 6, ex R. exulans, May
1961, GEH & C. M. Wheeler. Ookala: 2 dd, ex Rattus sp., Nov. 1945, B. Brookman. Paauhau, 90
m: 6 66, 1 9,ex 4M. musculus nests in subterranean nest boxes, July 1961, GEH; 132 m: 1 d;1 9,
ex H. auropunctatus, Dec. 1961, Sept. 1963, SK; (2.5 km ESE), 75 m: 34 dd, 17 99, ex M.
musculus nest with mice, Oct. 1963, GPM & TS; (5.4 km SE), 640 m: 1 9, ex R. exulans nest, Oct.
1963, WM. Pololu Valley, (0.6 km W), 311 m: 1 9, ex M. musculus, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI; (0.1 km
W), 323 m: 1 9, ex R. rattus, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI. Puu Waawaa (ranch headquarters) 842 m: 5
2¢, ex 21 M. musculus, Sep. 1963, GEH & GPM. Wainaia Gulch (N Kohala Dist.), 38 m: 1 6, ex R.
exulans, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI; 1 6, 1 9, ex R. rattus, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI. Waipio Valley, 238 m:
1 6, ex H. auropunctatus, July 1962, GEH & P. Q. Tomich; 5 m: 1 6, under house, Oct. 1969,
PQT.
HOSTS. Recorded from bodies and nests of M. musculus, R. exulans, R.
norvegicus, and R. rattus; from bodies of H. auropunctatus and Homo sapiens, and
under house.
The Hawaiian rat flea, X. vexabilis, or more properly the Oriental-Pacific rat
flea, was first recorded by Jordan (1932) through specimens collected by Eskey in
Honokaa and on Maui in 1932. When Eskey (1934) began his study in April 1932,
he was the first to detect the species in the islands. Other workers had collected _X.
vexabilis specimens earlier but had misdetermined them as Xenopsylla cheopis. We
were able to confirm that such confusion applied to most of the specimens collected
by Pemberton (Ewing, 1924) in 1922 and 1923 from R. norvegicus and R. rattus in
Honokaa. This example is discussed more fully under X. cheopis, but here we point
out that the collection and preservation of these specimens of X. vexabilis prove that
this species was infesting commensal rats in the enzootic plague area of the Hamakua
District as early as 21 November 1922. Although retrospective epidemiology is
beyond the scope of this paper, in the Hamakua District human plague cases reached
the all-time high of 12 (6 in Honokaa) in 1922, but only 1 case occurred in 1923.
_ Before 1932, R. exulans (the original true host of X. vexabilis in Hawaii) was
thought to be near extinction and specimens were not differentiated from the other
species of rats by plague surveillance personnel (Eskey, 1934). According to A. Hart,
Sr. (pers. com.), formerly of the Plague Surveillance Laboratory in Honokaa, before
Eskey’s study Hawaiian rats were classified as young Norway rats. This confusion
probably resulted in the absence of records of fleas from R. exulans (Ewing, 1924,
Buxton and Hopkins, 1927, Buxton, 1928). If R. exulans had not been confused
with the other rats, X. vexabilis probably would have been discovered sooner
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera a
because Jordan (1932) expected this rat, if really indigenous, to have a flea of its
own.
X. vexabilis is not an endemic flea, but it was probably the only mammal flea
inhabiting the islands when Cook arrived in 1778. Undoubtedly, ancient Polynesians
sailing from the South Pacific in prehistoric times brought with them R. exulans
infested with X. vexabilis.
Although Jordan (1932) described this flea as a new species, X. hawaiiensis, he
immediately recognized its close similarity to X. vexabilis, which he knew occurred
in Australia and New Guinea. He had earlier described X. vexabilis from South
Australia (Jordan, 1925), but it was not until he studied additional specimens from
Queensland that he concluded X. hawaiiensis was a subspecies of X. vexabilis
(Jordan, 1936). More recently X. vexabilis was reported from New Zealand (Smit,
1965, Ford-Robertson and Bull, 1966), Kermadec Islands (Smit, 1965), Cambodia
(Klein, 1971), Thailand (Sankasuwan et al., 1969), Christmas Island (Traub et al.,
1970), and Philippines (Traub et al., 1970). Traub (pers. com., 1972) advised us,
“The allusion by Traub et al. (1970) to the occurrence of X. vexabilis on Christmas
Island (south of Java) refers to the flea described as X. nesiotes J. & R., 1908, since
Traub was of the impression that this taxon may represent a subspecies of X.
vexabilis.”’
Except for the Australian records, these distribution data corroborate
archeological facts and theories on migrations of the Polynesian peoples and on the
locality of their ancestral home on mainland Asia. The South China-Indochina
coastal area is designated as the probable home of ancestors of migrant groups from
which Polynesians later branched (Suggs, 1960). As is well known, Polynesians were
accompanied by R. exulans on at least some of the long voyages between Pacific
islands (Tomich, 1969). A missing link is the lack of X. vexabilis records for the
Marquesas Islands (Stewart, 1935b, Adamson, 1939, Mumford, 1942) and the
Society Islands (Stewart, 1935a). Some of the other zoogeographical problems are
the absence of R. exulans among hosts reported for X. vexabilis in Cambodia (Klein,
1971) and the absence of old populations of R. exulans (and Polynesians) in
Australia (Smit, 1965) where the flea was collected from Leporillus jonesi and
Rattus culmorum (Hopkins and Rothschild, 1953).
For 29 years Hawaiian specimens of X. vexabilis were classified as X. ».
hawaiiensis. Smit (1965) concluded from a study of material from Australia, New
Zealand, and a long series of specimens that we collected in the Hamakua District
that there was no morphological basis for subspecies and synonymized them all with
X. vexabilis. This is quite understandable for specimens in New Zealand and the
Hawaiian Islands when it is recalled that ancestors of the Maoris and Hawaiians
probably left the Marquesas Islands directly and via the Society Islands for these
localities, respectively, in relatively recent times (Sinoto, 1968). Morphological
stability in isolated populations of X. vexabilis extends even further back in time as
Klein (1971) could find no morphological differences among specimens from
Hawaii, New Zealand, and mainland Asia (Cambodia and Thailand).
Islands where X. vexabilis seems most likely to be discovered are the Rattus
exulans-infested islets off the east coast of Oahu and on the main islands of Molokai
and Lanai. W. O. Wirtz II (pers. com., 1968) found no fleas on the many R. exulans
he examined on Kure Atoll.
X. vexabilis is a flea of lowlands. It is most abundant from sea level to about
475 m. Between 610 and 915 m specimens were seldom collected, but relatively
lighter survey efforts may be partly responsible. R. exulans is scarce between 915
and 1,220 m and unlike the other three murids is unknown above 1,250 m (Banko
and Wilson, 1968). As Eskey (1934) noted, the range of X. vexabilis seems to be
influenced strongly by the range of R. exulans. This is peculiar because R. exulans
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
does not generally occur in Australia, and in the Hawaiian Islands M. musculus and
R. norvegicus are true hosts and even R. rattus probably qualifies as a true host
when it inhabits burrows in places with sufficient moisture.
The record of two males of X. vexabilis from a R. rattus at lolehachae Camp,
1,915 m, requires the support of additional data. This is the only record from above
915 m. R. exulans was not found above 763 m on the Kukaiau Ranch. To the west,
however, this rat ranged up to 964 m on a foothill of Kohala Mountain, south of
Waipio Valley near Kamuela. This is 500 m above the known range of X. vexabilis in
the adjoining area just east of the valley. Intensive trapping was done there at 464 m,
yet only a single male X. vexabilis was found. Eskey’s (1934) highest record on
Hawaii, was from Upper Pohakea, 823 m, near the center of the enzootic plague
area. Elsewhere on the island we found X. vexabilis as high as 842 m in North Kona
District and 915 m in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.
On Maui, Eskey (1934) reported a few specimens from rats in the Kula
trapping zone. This zone ranged from about 762 m to about 1,220 m. He did not
specify the exact elevations of his X. vexabilis collections, but for his entire study he
reported a rapid decrease in prevalence at elevations above 610 m, and he even
suspected that a mean wintertime temperature of about 21°C resulted in a lower
infestation in winter. We assume that he found X. vexabilis only at the lower edge of
the Kula zone.
In summary, the maximum elevation record of X. vexabilis that we accept is
915 m. Certainly, renewed collecting efforts would cause us to revise this figure
upward, but it is questionable that this species can maintain a resident population
above 1,220 m.
X. vexabilis does not flourish in microhabitats as dry as those in which X.
cheopis thrives (Eskey, 1934, Stark and Kartman, 1957). In its known range, at least
where average annual rainfall is less than 2,540 mm, it is primarily a flea of
subterranean nests and burrows that are not sheltered by buildings. In the relative
dryness of Honolulu, Eskey (1934) could not find specimens and Cole and Koepke
(1947b) could find only 12 specimens among 41,402 fleas collected from rats.
Eskey (1934) remarked that he was able to collect specimens in windward central
Maui (Kahului and Puunene) where there is less rainfall than in Honolulu. Kahului
and Puunene receive an approximate average annual rainfall of only 419 mm. As he
suspected, however, air over central Maui has a higher average percent relative
humidity than air over Honolulu.
As for the detrimental effects of high rainfall, Eskey (1934) reported that in
wet areas such as the Hilo trapping sector (Laupahoehoe-Hilo-Olaa) the index was
rather low and 71% of his specimens were females. Olaa is the wettest locality with
an average of about 3,683 mm of rainfall per year.
Seasonal occurrence of X. vexabilis on trapped rats was more stable on R.
exulans than on the other two species (Eskey, 1934). Superior host suitability (Haas,
1965a) may be a factor, but a good reason is that R. exulans populations are the
most stable of all rodent populations in Hawaii (Tomich, ms).
After Eskey (1934) pooled his data from all rats trapped on Maui and in the
Hamakua District, he found the highest indices during October-December, the
lowest during April-June, and intermediate indices during January-March and
July-September. He found the highest X. vexabilis infestations of R. exulans in
July-December and the lowest during January-June, especially April-June.
The Plague Research Unit had several study sites in the Hamakua District. The
highest infestations of trapped R. exulans were at two of the lowest sites. One was
between 76 and 183 m in irrigated cane field 001 of the Paauhau Sugar Co., and the
other was between about 122 and 244 m along the east edge of Kahaupu Gulch.
Both sites are near Paauhau. However, because plague was more recently detected in
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 29
the Kukuihaele area, more intensive studies were conducted there in Honokaa Sugar
Co. cane field 101b, particularly between 270 and 299 m. This field is well within
the elevation-temperature range of X. vexabilis. The flea was present throughout
growth of cane crops of 1959-1961 and 1961-1963 in small to moderate numbers.
Nest studies provided evidence that breeding occurred in all months at Kukuihaele
(Haas, 1966b, 1969).
In the Paauhau area, a high peak in the infestation of trapped R. exulans almost
always occurred in August-November with sometimes a secondary peak in
February-March, 1958-1963. In the Kukuihaele area, the 1961-1963 data indicated
peak infestations in November 1961-January 1962 (before nesting in the field by R.
exulans) and June and November 1962 (Haas, 1969). Fleas were least numerous in
February-March and September 1962 and January-March 1963. Including data back
to September 1958, R. exulans from Kukuihaele had the highest X. vexabilis
infestations during October-December with secondary peaks during June-July.
Nests of R. exulans on the average are more heavily infested with X. vexabilis
than are the rats caught alive in traps. Trapping rats for determination of flea indices
is considerably easier than excavating burrows for fleas in nests. Estimating that
proportion of the entire flea population that is in nests only from knowledge of
mean numbers of fleas on trapped rats is conjectural as only preliminary quantitative
data from the Kukuihaele area are available (Haas, 1969). From 1961-1964 a
distinct seasonal cycle occurred in X. vexabilis in R. exulans nests in the Hamakua
District, from 152 to 305 m (241 m average), with a peak in June and a low in
January. In cane field 101b at Kukuihaele, 278-299 m, a peak occurred in January
as well as July (Haas, 1969). Predominance of females during a wintertime increase
in population size suggested that during about three months in midwinter (mean soil
temperature below 19 or 20°C) low temperature became a detrimental factor. The
effect was to depress the peak of January 1963 at the expense of the males.
Apparently mortality was increased or development of immature stages was delayed
relative to females. To modify Eskey’s (1934) hypothesis, we may say that when
males have declined below 45% of the X. vexabilis population in R. exulans nests,
conditions during the preceding weeks have not been entirely favorable for an
increase in the total numbers of X. vexabilis. For house mouse nests the
corresponding value would be about 55%.
According to nest-box studies at Kukuihaele, the seasonal occurrence of X.
vexabilis in R. exulans nests appeared to be under the influence of the rats (their
breeding, mortality, migrality, social behavior) primarily and the seasonal changes in
femperature secondarily (Haas, 1969). Doubtless, seasonal changes of the climate
influenced the hosts, for R. exulans has distinct annual cycles of reproduction and
abundance (Tomich, ms). Changes in cane plants as they grew also affected these
rats in ways of significance to fleas, i.e., nesting habits (Haas, 1969). After R.
exulans became a nesting resident of the cane field proper, fleas in the field were
vitally affected by being exposed to ever changing quantities and qualities of rats in
nests and by being in nests which themselves were changing in quantity and quality.
These changes in the rat population and in the rat nests directly affected flea
breeding. For example, when there was a declining mean number of rats per nest
prior to the summertime wave of parturition, as in late winter of 1961-1962, there
was a concentration of actively feeding and breeding fleas on those hosts remaining.
This set the stage for an increase in the mean number of fleas per nest a month or so
later and was especially noticeable when reinforced by a concurrent wave of
maturation of young rats on a per nest basis. Mature R. exulans are more suitable for
feeding and breeding by X. vexabilis than weanlings (Haas, 1965a). Also mature
males ranked ahead of mature females.
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Chronological changes in the size and quality of the X. vexabilis population in
each nest of R. exulans, as the nest ages, are suggested by data (Table 3) obtained
from the nest-box studies (Haas, 1969). In particular, a large number of larvae
hatched during the first month, and by the second month many of these larvae had
pupated. A relatively slight population shift from larvae to adults was evident
between the second and third months, but by the last month of any series, larvae
were found in only a sixth of the nests. Qualitative changes in the microhabitat as
the nest ages are clearly of importance in the ecology of X. vexabilis.
Table 3. Composition of Xenopsylla vexabilis populations according to percentages of
adults and larvae in infested nests of Rattus exulans and Mus musculus as the nests aged in
subterranean nest boxes in cane field 101b, Kukuihaele, Hawaii, January 1962-March 19631
Nest inhabitant and month of observation
No. of nests and
percent of fleas Rattus exulans Mus musculus
1 2 3 last? 1 2 2 23
Nests 29 18 £2 12 41 15 we & 7
Fleas
Adults only 52 61 67 83 68 53 67 57
Adults + larvae 41 28 25 17 27 47 33 43
Larvae only 2 11 8 0 5 0 0 0
Larvae presumed to be all X. vexabilis or mixed with a few specimens of Leptopsylla segnis.
2Last in a series of 3-7 consecutive monthly observations.
3Last in a series of 3-6 consecutive monthly observations.
M. musculus is a much less suitable host than R. exulans (Haas, 1965a).
Nevertheless, the house mouse was usually the most abundant rodent in cane field
101b near Kukuihaele in the early 1960’s, and it ranked as the second most
important host after R. exulans. In fact, despite the scarcity of fleas on trapped
individuals, examination of their nests revealed numerous X. vexabilis so that mice
occasionally supported a higher total population of these fleas than did R. exulans
(Haas, 1966b). Thus, M@. musculus served as a suitable host for rat fleas. The seasonal
occurrence of X. vexabilis in mouse nests in field 101b reached its highest peak in
July and August and had a secondary peak in December (Haas, 1969).
An increase in the mean number of mice (nestlings excluded) per occupied nest
appeared to favor an increase of the flea population in mouse nests provided that the
fleas were allowed a month to develop. In rat nests the comparable relationship was
not strong (Haas, 1969). However, quantities of animals in mouse and rat nests were
not equal. The mean number of fleas in mouse nests had a smaller and lower range,
and the mean number of mice in nests had a higher range (Haas, 1966b, 1969).
Furthermore, a comparison of infestation data from mouse and rat nests (Table 3)
suggests that despite the similarity in the third month, which has the smallest sample
of mouse nests, oviposition and larval growth were sluggish in nests of M. musculus
and rapid in nests of R. exulans. This interpretation is supported by experimental
determinations that feeding and breeding rates on M. musculus were much lower
than on R. exulans (Haas, 1965a).
The foregoing discussion may serve as an introduction to the variations of X.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 31
vexabilis population sizes in space and time and according to species, sex, and age of
host animal, and according to age and “‘species”’ of nest. If such heterogeneous data
are pooled, the sum total can be influenced according to weight various factors
receive. In other words, the apparent seasonal abundance easily can be a biased view
of the real area-wide as well as local abundance.
Eskey (1934) was not unaware of problems of heterogeneity, but he pooled
species of rats trapped in each locality. It is impossible to know if all three species
were infested in all localities. He was first to record the mongoose as a host, but he
did not specify on which island(s) the infested mongooses were trapped. The record
of man as a host comes from his inference based on epidemiological evidence from
the enzootic plague areas on Maui and Hawaii. He believed, however, that most cases
of human plague resulted from bites of X. cheopis and that X. vexabilis was mainly
responsible for perpetuation of plague among field rats living away from buildings in
rural areas. Using a virulent strain of Yersinia pestis from Maui, the vector
efficiencies of these two species of fleas were compared experimentally and it was
concluded that X. cheopis (San Francisco strain) had about twice the efficiency of
X. vexabilis (Hamakua strain) (Kartman et al., 1956).
RHOPALOPSYLLIDAE
9. PARAPSYLLUS LA YSANENSIS WILSON, n. sp.
(Figures 28-31, 33)
Parapsyllus sp.: Haas et al., 1971, Haw. J. Hist. 5:71.
DIAGNOSIS. P. laysanensis belongs to the Jongicornis-group and _ is
distinguished from the seven other members in this group by the shape of the
median dorsal lobe (m.d.l.), distal-lateral lobe (d.1.1.), and crochet (cr.) of the
aedeagus in the male, and sternum VII (st.VI1) and spermatheca in the female.
DESCRIPTION. Head (Fig. 28): Frontal tubercle (fr.tub.) typically arrowhead-
shaped, varying in extent of projection and sharpness of tip, arising low in
frontoclypeal region; frontal row of 1 to 3 long setae; ocular row of 3 long setae, all
longer than setae of frontal row, 2 in front of sinuate eye, 1 near genal margin
reaching up to 3rd segment of maxillary palp; several short setae above last large seta
of ocular row and above eye; 0 to 2 short setae between upper 2 long setae of ocular
row. Genal process (gen.pro.) short and broad, with 5 to 7 short setae near or on
ventral margin. Postantennal region with occipital row of 3 or 4 setae, ventralmost
seta much longer than others; 2 or 3 long setae above antennal groove; 5 to 11 short
setae in irregular row bordering dorsal margin of antennal groove. Maxillary palp
4-segmented. Labial palp 5-segmented, extending to middle of trochanter. Longest
seta of 2nd antennal segment reaching to 3rd segment of club.
Thorax (Fig. 28): Pro-, meso-, and metanotum with 1 row of 7 to 9 setae on
each side (excluding intercalary setae); pseudosetae absent. Mesepisternum with 1
seta; mesepimeron with 1 seta. Metepisternum with 1 seta; metasternum without
setae; metepimeron with 2 rows of setae, 2 to 4 in anterior row, 5 to 8 in posterior
row, setae of posterior row may be irregularly arranged and of different lengths.
Legs (Fig. 28): Mid and hind tibiae each with 5 notches in posterior (dorsal)
margin, with 2 setae in each notch; apical notch of mid and hind tibiae with 4 setae.
Fore and mid tibiae with 1 apical seta longer than tarsal segment I. Hind tarsal
segments II and III with at least 1 apical seta as long as or longer than succeeding
segment. Fore tarsal segment V, and mid and hind tarsal segments I longest. Segment
V of all tarsi with 3 or 4 pairs of lateral plantar setae, 7 with 3 pairs, 30 with 4 pairs,
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
10 with 7 setae; 1 pair of pre-apical plantar hairs; 2 pairs of pre-apical plantar setae,
1 with 1 seta; 0 to 5 short plantar setae in area of last pair of lateral plantar setae, 5
with 0, 22 with 1, 11 with 2, 5 with 3, 3 with 4, and 1 with 5 setae, males averaged
over 1 seta more than females; 6 of 47 tarsi with 1 plantar hair in area of Ist 2 pairs
of lateral plantar setae. _
Abdomen (Fig. 30): Terga I to VI with 2 rows of setae and circular spiracular
fossae, main (posterior) row with 8 or 9 long setae alternating with shorter ones and
preceded by somewhat irregular row of 6 to 9 shorter setae; tergum VII (t. VID) with
similar setae but not in discernable rows; lowest seta in each row (except on tergum
I) below level of spiracle. Sterna II to VII with 9 to 19 long setae, of variable length.
Modified abdominal segments. Male (Figs. 29, 31): Sternum VIII apical margin
broadly rounded, with 15 to 20 long setae on ventral part. Apodeme of tergum IX
(a.t.IX) rather narrow, without anterior lobe. Manubrium (man.) narrow and slightly
curved dorsally, with upturned rounded apex. Body of clasper (b.cl.) quadrangular,
with distinct surface sculpture, about 30 long setae on and near dorsal and posterior
margins, about 20 long setae dorsoapically on inner surface; group of 2 to 5 setae
anterior to acetabulum (acet.) near base of manubrium, occasionally 1 or 2 setae
posterior to this group and anterior to base of acetabulum. Movable process (m.p.)
elongate, rounded at apex, with about 20 short setae on dorsoapical one-fourth of
anterior margin, posterior margin, and mid-portion (both sides), anterior margin
slightly angulate with denticulus in middle. Proximal arm of sternum IX (p.a.st.IX)
sharply to bluntly hooked anteriorly at apex, with broadly rounded anterior lobe;
distal arm of sternum IX (d.a.st.I[X) elongate and triangular, gradually tapering to
rounded apex, 17 or 18 short, mostly marginal setae on apical one-third, more setae
ventral than dorsal, midventral margin in area of anteriormost seta slightly convex.
Aedeagal apodeme extends slightly anterior to manubrium, a single penis rod makes
one-quarter revolution anterior to aedeagal apodeme; other structures as illustrated.
Female (Figs. 30, 33): Sternum VII lacking sinus, posterior margin extended as
narrow lobe, somewhat variable as illustrated, with irregular row of 7 to 10 mostly
long setae preceded by 4 to 9 shorter setae. Sternum VIII (st. VIII) small, somewhat
narrow and broadly rounded posteriorly, with 3 to 6 minute marginal or
submarginal setae on apex, occasionally 1 seta shifted antero-dorsally. Tergum VIII
(t. VIII) well developed, slightly lobed dorsocaudally, with sinuate posterior margin,
chaetotaxy as indicated. Sternum VIII and tergum VIII with distinct surface
sculpturing. Anal stylet (an.sty.) about twice as long as maximum width. Duct of
bursa copulatrix (d.b.c.) thick-walled, upper one-fourth curved anteriorly. Bulga
(bu.) of spermatheca oval; hilla (hi.) longer than greatest length of bulga, curved,
slightly constricted at entrance to bulga.
Length: Male 1.96 to 2.06 mm; female 2.41 to 3.18 mm.
DISTRIBUTION. Hawaiian Islands.
LAYSAN. Holotype male (BISHOP 8818), ex Diomedea immutabilis nest, 8 Dec. 1963, N.
Wilson. Allotype female, ex D. immutabilis nest, 9 Dec. 1963, NW. Paratypes: 3 of 5 99, ex D.
immutabilis nest, 6 Dec. 1963, NW; 2 dd, 5 of 6 ?? (holotype selected from this series); 1 3, 1 of 2
9¢; 1 %, same data as holotype; 2 9; 1 °, ex Puffinus pacificus nest, 9 Dec. 1963, NW. Additional
specimens: those listed above with paratypes; 3 9° (unmounted), ex P. pacificus nest, 8 Dec. 1963,
NW. Some of the above specimens were damaged in the process of remounting and the worst of
these were not designated as paratypes. Holotype, allotype, and several paratypes and additional
specimens in Bernice P. Bishop Museum collection; other paratypes and specimens in collections of
various institutions and colleagues.
HOSTS. Recorded from nests of D. immutabilis and P. pacificus.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 33
P. laysanensis shares its closest relationship with Parapsyllus taylori Jordan, a
species known from several islands off the coast of southwestern and southeastern
Australia. The aedeagus in P. laysanensis has the median dorsal lobe broader and not
as strongly flexed ventrally and the distal-lateral lobe of a slightly different shape
(Figs. 31, 32). Also the crochet is shorter and not as strongly hooked at the apex
(Figs. 31, 32). Females of the two species are very similar with slight differences in
the shape of sternum VII and spermatheca (Figs. 33, 34).
The genus Parapsyllus is best known from the southern hemisphere, where it is
widely distributed over the southern oceans, especially in the New Zealand and
Australian subregions (Dunnet, 1964). Smit (1970) recently described a new species
from the Galapagos Islands and considerably extended the range of the genus
northward. The closest previous record was from Zapalla (north of Valparaiso),
Chile (Jordan, 1942). The majority of species and records are from sea birds which
nest in burrows or on the surface of the ground.
Our specimens were found by slowly and tediously turning sand in nests of the
Laysan albatross and wedge-tailed shearwater. Five additional fleas escaped,
including a pair in copulo.
Smit (1964) believes that specimens of Parapsyilus are regularly carried by
sea birds from one island to another although the chances are slim for the
establishment of a new population. Nevertheless, specimens reached Laysan,
probably by this method and probably on a species of Puffinus. Puffinus is
widespread throughout the Pacific and includes species which migrate great distances
both north and south. P. pacificus (nest) is recorded as a host for both P. Jaysanensis
and P. taylori.
CERATOPHYLLIDAE
10. NOSOPSYLLUS FASCIATUS (BOSC)
(Figures 35-37)
Pulex fasciatus Bosc, 1800, Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 2:156.
Ceratophyllus fasciatus: Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth.
Rep. 50:256.
Nosopsyllus fasciatus: Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13, 14, 16-18, 46, 47, 53, 55,
59.-Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 50:256.-Thompson, 1937, Ent. Mon. Mag.
73:186.--Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.--Simmons et al., 1944, Global Epidemiology,
vol. I, pt. 2, p. 289.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p.
14.--Rumreich & Koepke, 1945, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1422.--Cole & Koepke, 1947, Pub. Hlth.
Rep. Suppl. 202:31.--Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 66:1542.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J.
Mamm. 33:351.--Kartman & Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid. Hith. Org. 13:50.--Alicata, 1967, Haw.
Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 43, 78, 79, 85, 86, 107, 108, 113, 114.--Malley & Devick,
1968, Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., pp. 274, 281.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs.
Tech. Rep. 68-61-ES, p. 201.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii, pp. 54,
35,95, 96, 108, 110, 150, 151, 158, 159.--Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian Land Mammals, p. 133.
Nosopsyllus (Ceratophyllus) fasciatus: Buxton, 1941, Bull. Ent. Res. 32:121.
Nosopsylla fasciata: Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:227.
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan.
OAHU. Recorded by Rumreich and Koepke (1945) from a commensal rat and by Cole and
Koepke (1947b) from Rattus sp. in Honolulu.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Haiku, Kahului, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia,
Makawao, Olinda, Puunene, and Upper Paia (Paia); recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Pemberton (1943);
recorded by Simmons et al. (1944) from rats; recorded by Pemberton (1945) from rats; recorded
(Eskey, 1934) by Bonnet (1948) from rats in the Kula region; recorded (Pemberton, 1945) by
Alicata (1967) from rats. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Kipahulu Valley, 991 m: 1 6, ex Rattus
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
exulans, Aug. 1967, N. Wilson; 1 6; 1 9, ex Rattus rattus, Aug. 1967, NW; 1,982 m: 3 ??, ex 2 z
rattus, Aug. 1967, NW.
HAWAII. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Ahualoa, Honokaa, Kalopa, Kukaiau,
Kukuihaele, Laupahoehoe, Lower Pohakea, Olaa (Keaau), S Hilo Dist., and Upper Pohakea;
recorded (Eskey, 1934) by Pemberton (1943); recorded by Simmons et al. (1944) from rats;
recorded by Pemberton (1945) from rats; recorded by Gross and Bonnet (1951) in the Hamakua
region; recorded by Kartman and Lonergan (1955) in the Hamakua Dist., recorded (Pemberton,
1945) by Alicata (1967) from rats; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from rodents.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Halepiula, 1,769 m: 1 °, ex Rattus norvegicus, Feb. 1964, G. P. Mills
& T. Sagucio. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (Kipuka Puaulu (Bird Park)), 1,220 m: many, ex
3 R. rattus, Mar., Apr. 1965, R. Y. W. Lee; (Namakani Paio campground), 1,205 m: many, ex 2 R.
rattus, Apr. 1965, RYWL. Honokaa (3 km SW: Ahualoa Homesteads), 610 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex RK.
norvegicus nest with rat, Apr. 1963, GPM & TS; (2.6 km S: Hamakua Forest Reserve), 595 m: 2
99, ex R. exulans nest, Apr. 1964, GPM & TS. Kaapahu Homesteads (Hamakua Dist.), 720 m: 1 4,
2 29, ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Dec. 1961, S. Kaaekuahiwi. Kahawailiilii Gulch (N slope Mauna
Kea), 1,598 m: 1 9, ex R. rattus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Kapulena, 476 m: 1 6, ex #7.
auropunctatus, Aug. 1962, SK. Keanakolu (hunters’ cabin), 1,613 m: 1 6, 3 99, ex 2 KR. rattus,
July 1968, SK & E. Auna; (Parker Ranch Station), 1,650 m: 1 6, 3 99, ex 5 R. norvegicus, July
1968, SK & EA; (ranger station), 1,610 m: many, ex Mus musculus, Feb., Mar. 1964, GPM & TS.
Kilauea Military Camp area, 1,220 m: 1 6, ex R. norvegicus, Apr. 1965, RYWL. Kohala Mtn. (E
slope Haloa), 964 m: 1 6, ex M. musculus, Apr. 1964, GPM & TS; 1 6, 2 99, ex R. exulans, May
1964, GPM & TS. Kukaiau Ranch (Iolehaehae Camp), 1,915 m: many, ex M. musculus, Mar. 1964,
GPM & TS; 1 6, 1 9, ex R. rattus, Mar. 1964, GPM & TS; (stone corral), 1,586 m: many, ex R.
norvegicus, Feb., Mar. 1964, GPM & TS; 1 6, 2 99 ex R. rattus, Mar. 1964, GPM & TS; Kukuihaele
(3.1 km SSE), 488 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex R. exulans nest, June 1961, G. E. Haas; (2.5 km SSW), 496 m:
1 6, 5 99, ex R. exulans nest with dead rat, Aug. 1962, GEH; (3 km SSW: Hamakua Forest
Reserve), 564 m: many, ex M. musculus, Mar., June, Aug. 1961, GEH & C. M. Wheeler; many, ex
R. exulans, Mar.-Sept. 1961, GEH & CMW; 5, ex R. norvegicus, Mar., Apr. 1961, GEH & CMW;
many, ex R. rattus, Mar., May, June, Sept. 1961, GEH & CMW. Makahalau Camp, 1,171 m: 2 dd,
6 2°, ex 4R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Mana, 1,074 m: 3 6d, 7 29, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1962,
GEH & GPM. Paauilo (5.4 km SE), 640 m: 5 6d, 11 99, ex R. exulans nest, Oct. 1963, W. Mills;
(5.0 km ESE), 473 m: 4 66, 4 99, ex R. exulans nest, Dec. 1963, WM; (5.6 km SE), 579 m: 12 de,
13 99, ex R. exulans nest, Feb. 1964, WM. Palihooukapapa, 1,269 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex R. norvegicus,
Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM; 3 99, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Pohakuloa, 1,983 m: 1 6; 1
3, ex M. musculus, July 1962, W. Graf. Puu Keanui cinder cone (N Kona Dist., Puu Lehua
Quadrangle), 1,594 m: 1 9, ex M. musculus, Jan. 1963, GEH. Puu Kihe (NE slope Mauna Kea,
forestry plot), 2,379 m: 2 66, ex M. musculus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; (NE slope Mauna Kea,
cabins), 2,364 m: 2 dd, 5 9, ex 4 R. mattus, July 1968, SK & EA. Puu Waawaa (ranch
headquarters), 839 m: 1 9, ex R. rattus, Aug. 1968, SK & EA. Umikoa (Kukaiau Ranch
Headquarters), 1,068 m: 2 99, ex R. norvegicus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; 3 99, ex M. musculus,
July 1968, SK & EA.
HOSTS. Recorded from bodies and nests of R. exulans and R. norvegicus; from
bodies of M. musculus, H. auropunctatus, and R. rattus.
The northern rat flea, N. fasciatus, was first recorded by Eskey (1934) from
specimens collected in 1932-1933 in several localities on Maui and Hawaii. This
species probably entered the Hawaiian Islands in the nineteenth century or earlier on
R. norvegicus and R. rattus that left ships calling at Hawaiian ports. The island
where this flea is most likely undiscovered is Molokai. During a murine typhus
survey on Kauai by the Hawaii Department of Health in 1960-1961, J. T. Kajiwara
(unpublished) found Leptopsylla segnis, but not N. fasciatus on rats trapped at
higher elevations.
N. fasciatus shows more aversion to higher temperatures than L. segnis, very
rarely being found near sea level. In the Hamakua District, occasional specimens
were found on rodents as low as 366 m in winter. The maximum elevation record
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 35
was 2,379 m at Puu Kihe, but the species probably ranges as high as its hosts occur.
In subterranean nests the lowest elevation record is 473 m near Paauilo. The
specimens were in a R. exulans nest excavated from a burrow in December.
Average annual rainfall up to 2,743 mm seems to be unimportant in the
geographic distribution of N. fasciatus. This flea ranges into the dry area of
Pohakuloa where the approximate average annual rainfall is slightly below 508 mm.
Eskey (1934) recorded a specimen from Olaa (3,683 mm of rainfall), which is
probably at too low an elevation for a resident population. Our records indicate a
resident population in the area southwest of Kukaiau, which has an average annual
rainfall of about 2,743 mm.
Seasonal occurrence of N. fasciatus in nests is unknown. On trapped rats Eskey
(1934) reported the heaviest infestation during the “‘winter’’ months, especially at
elevations below 762 m. At higher elevations in the Kula zone on Maui, he found
lesser but still considerable numbers during ‘‘spring”’ and “‘summer’”’.
True hosts of N. fasciatus are probably R. exulans, R. norvegicus, and R. rattus,
and possibly M. musculus, although nests of the latter two species have not been
recorded as being infested with northern rat fleas. Eskey (1934) reported that this
flea was rarely found on mice. On the contrary, we found them common on mice
trapped in a Eucalyptus plantation 3 km SSW of Kukuihaele, 564 m, during
March-June 1961. For example, in May the average number of N. fasciatus on 111
mice was 1.4, and on the 58 mice (52%) that were infested, the average was 2.7.
Four R. exulans and five R. rattus trapped in the same plantation at the same time
had indices of 3.3 and 2.0, respectively.
Eskey (1934) pooled species of rats in each locality, so it is impossible to know
if all three species were infested in all localities. He did not specify whether infested
M. musculus and H. auropunctatus were on Maui, Hawaii, or both islands.
LEPTOPSY LLIDAE
11. LEPTOPSYLLA SEGNIS (SCHONHERR)
(Figures 38-40)
Pulex segnis Schonherr, 1811, Kongl. Vet. Akad. Nya. Handl. 32:98.
Ctenopsyllus misculi (sic): Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:210.
Ctenopsyllus musculi: Ewing, 1924, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 26:210.--Pemberton, 1925, Bull. Exp.
Sta. Haw. Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull. No. 17:44.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee
Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Feb. 1967, Preliminary List of Common Names of Hawaiian
Insects and Organisms, pp. 7, 30.
Leptopsylla musculi: Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13.-Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hith.
ae 50:256.--Wu et al., 1936, Plague: A Manual for Medical and Public Health Workers, p.
Leptopsylla segnis: Eskey, 1934, Pub. Hlth. Bull. No. 213:13, 14, 16-18, 47, 48, 53, 55,
59.--Anonymous, 1935, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 50:256.-Thompson, 1937, Ent. Mon. Mag.
73:186.--Pemberton, 1945, Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p.14.-Rumreich &
Koepke, 1945, Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1422.-Cole & Koepke, 1947, Pub. Hlth. Rep. Suppl.
202:31.--Bonnet, 1948, Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 13:227.~-Gross & Bonnet, 1951, Pub. Hlth. Rep.
66:1542.--Baldwin et al., 1952, J. Mamm. 33:351.--Kartman & Lonergan, 1955, Bull. Wid.
Hith. Org. 13:50, 66.--Gross, 1961, Proc. Ninth Pacif. Sci. Congr. Pacif. Sci. Assoc.
19:53.--Alicata, 1967, Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 61:42, 78, 79, 85, 107, 108,
114.--Haw. Ent. Soc. Committee Common Names Hawaiian Insects, Dec. 1967, Preliminary List
of Common Names of Hawaiian Insects and Organisms, p. 4.--Malley & Devick, 1968,
Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc., p. 281.--Alicata, 1969, Parasites of Man and Animals in Hawaii,
pp. 54, 95, 96, 110, 150, 151, 159.--Haas, 1969, Pacif. Sci. 23:72.-Kramer, 1971, Hawaiian
Land Mammals, p. 133.
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Ctenopsyllus segnis: Pemberton, 1943, Haw. Med. J. 2:191.-Simmons et al., 1944, Global
Epidemiology, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 290.--Travis et al., 1968, U.S. Army Natick Labs. Tech. Rep.
68-61-ES, p. 199.
Leptopsylla (Leptopsylla) segnis: Hopkins & Rothschild, 1971, an Illustrated Catalogue of the
Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History), vol. V,
p. 186.
DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan.
KAUAI. ?Kokee: 4 66, ex 18 Rattus exulans, Oct. 1960, J. T. Kajiwara; 60 dd, 54 99, ex 15
Rattus norvegicus, Oct. 1960, JTK; 2 dd, 8 99, ex 3 of 21 Rattus rattus, Oct. 1960, JTK. Waimea
Dist.: 2 6d, ex 13 R. norvegicus, June 1961, JTK.
OAHU. Recorded by Rumreich and Koepke (1945) from commensal rats and by Cole and
Koepke (1947b) from Rattus sp. in Honolulu.
MAUI. Recorded by Eskey (1934) from rats in Haiku, Kahului, Kailua, Kula, Lower Paia,
Makawao, Olinda, and Upper Paia (Paia), and from Mus musculus; recorded by Pemberton (1943)
from rats, mice, and mongoose; recorded by Simmons et al. (1944) from rats and mice; recorded
by Bonnet (1948) from rats in the Kula region. ADDITIONAL RECORD. Haleakala National Park
(Crater Observatory), 2,989 m: 1 9, ex R. rattus, July 1962, R. J. Badaracco.
HAWAII. Recorded by Ewing (1924) from M. musculus and R. norvegicus in Honokaa;
recorded by Pemberton (1925) from mice in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Eskey (1934) from
rats in Ahualoa, Honokaa, Kalopa, Kukaiau, Kukuihaele, Lower Pohakea, and Upper Pohakea, and
from M. musculus in Hamakua Dist. and vicinity of Hilo, and from rats in vicinity of Hilo, that is,
Olaa (Keaau), and the S Hilo Dist.; recorded by Pemberton (1943) from rats, mice, and
mongooses; recorded by Simmons et al. (1944) from rats and mice; recorded by Gross and Bonnet
(1951) in the Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Kartman and Lonergan (1955) from nest of Hawaiian
rat in Kaunamano Gulch, Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Gross (1961) from all rodent species in the
Hamakua Dist.; recorded by Malley and Devick (1968) from M. musculus and other rodents;
recorded by Haas (1969) from rodents near Kukuihaele. ADDITIONAL RECORDS. Halepiula,
1,769 m: many, ex M. musculus, Feb., Mar. 1964, G. P. Mills and T. Sagucio; 1 6, 2 99, ex R.
norvegicus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; 3 99, ex R. rattus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Halepohaku (cabins),
2,818 m: 2 dd, 3 99, ex M. musculus, May 1969, P. Q. Tomich; (picnic area) 2,940 m: 1 6, 19; 1
3, 4 99, ex M. musculus, May 1969, PQT. Hanaipoe, 1,574 m: 5 ??, ex M. musculus, Feb. 1964,
GPM & TS; 2 6d, ex R. rattus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (Kipuka
Nene), 915 m: 1 6, ex R. rattus, Dec. 1961, G. E. Haas; (Kipuka Puaulu (Bird Park)), 1,220 m: 1
6, 1 9, ex R. rattus, Mar. 1965, R. Y. W. Lee. Hawi (2.3 km SSW), 528 m: 1 6,1 9;16;16,exM.
musculus, Jan., Feb. 1962, GEH & T. Ishinaga; 1 9, ex R. exulans, Jan. 1962, GEH & TI. Honokaa
(3 km SW: Ahualoa Homesteads), 610 m: 3 99, ex R. norvegicus nest with rat, Apr. 1963, GPM &
TS; (1.7 km NE), 168 m: 1 6, 3 99, ex M. musculus nest, Jan. 1964, S. Kaaekuahiwi & E. Auna.
Kahawailiilii Gulch (N slope Mauna Kea), 1,598 m: 2 99, ex R. rattus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS.
Kapulena (2.8 km SW: Hamakua Forest Reserve), 610 m: 29 dd, 15 99, ex R. exulans nest, Mar.
1964, W. Mills. Keanakolu (ranger station), 1,610 m: 3 66, 2 99, ex M. musculus, Mar. 1964, GPM
& TS. Kilauea Military Camp (1.6 km NE), 1,225 m: 1 6, ex R. rattus, June 1962, W. Graf; 2 dd, 2
99; 2 29, ex M. musculus, June, July 1962, WG. Kohala Mtn. (E slope Haloa), 964 m: many, ex M.
musculus, Apr. 1964, GPM & TS. Kukaiau Ranch (NE slope Mauna Kea), 1,586 m: 5 dd, 8 99, ex
R. norvegicus, Mar. 1964, GPM & TS; 6 99, ex 2 R. rattus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; (Iolehaehae
Camp), 1,915 m: 1 6, 2 99, ex M. musculus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS; 3 99, ex R. rattus, Mar. 1964,
GPM & TS. Kukuihaele, 259 m: 1 6, ex Herpestes auropunctatus, Aug. 1962, SK; 270 m: 23 de,
31 99, ex 6 M. musculus nests in subterranean nest boxes, Jan., Mar. 1961, GEH; (3 km SSW:
Hamakua Forest Reserve), 564 m: many, ex many M. musculus & R. exulans, Mar.-Oct. 1961,
GEH & C. M. Wheeler; many, ex R. norvegicus, Mar., Apr. 1961, GEH & CMW; many, ex many R.
rattus, May-Sept. 1961, GEH & CMW. Makahalau Camp, 1,171 m: 2 dd, 2 99, ex M. musculus,
Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM; 1 6, 4 99, ex 2 R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Mana, 1,074 m: 2 de,
7 29, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Napoopoo (1 km E), 76 m: 1 ?, ex M. musculus, Feb.
1962, N. Wilson & SK. Paauilo (5.4 km SE), 640 m: 1 6, 1 9, ex R. exulans nest, Oct. 1963, WM.
Palihooukapapa, 1,269 m: 4 dd, 4 99, ex R. rattus, Nov. 1962, GEH & GPM. Pohakuloa, 1,983 m:
3 dd, 9 99, ex 3 M. musculus, July 1962, WG. Puuanahulu, 665 m: many, ex many M. musculus,
Sept. 1963, GEH & GPM. Puu Keanui cinder cone (N Kona Dist., Puu Lehua Quadrangle), 1,594
m: 13 66, 11 99, ex M. musculus, Jan. 1963, GEH. Puu Kihe (NE slope Mauna Kea, foresty plot),
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 37
2,349 m: 3 66, 5 99, ex 2 M. musculus, Mar. 1964, GPM & TS; (NE slope Mauna Kea, cabins),
2,364 m: 6 99, ex 4 R. rattus, July 1968, SK & EA. Puu Waawaa (ranch headquarters), 842 m:
many, ex many M. musculus, Sept. 1963, GEH & GPM. Umikoa (Kukaiau Ranch Headquarters),
1,067 m: many, ex M. musculus & R. norvegicus, Feb. 1964, GPM & TS. Waikii (5.2 km SSE:
Kilohana Girl Scout Camp), 1,708 m: 2 6d, 2 99; 1 6, 3 99, ex R. rattus, Apr., Sept. 1964, R. I.
Baldwin.
HOSTS. Recorded from bodies and nests of M. musculus, R. exulans, and R.
norvegicus ; from bodies of H. auropunctatus and R. rattus.
The mouse flea, L. segnis, was first recorded by Ewing (1924) from specimens
collected in 1922-1923 in Honokaa by Pemberton. This species probably entered the
Hawaiian Islands in the nineteenth century if not earlier, on M. musculus, R.
norvegicus, and R. rattus that left ships calling at Hawaiian ports. Islands where this
flea is most likely to be discovered are Molokai and Lanai.
L. segnis shows less aversion to heat than does N. fasciatus, but even so
specimens are not often found near sea level. On the Island of Hawaii, mouse fleas
are commonly encountered throughout the year on rodents trapped above 300 m.
The maximum elevation from which specimens are recorded is 2,989 m, on Maui,
but the host was trapped inside a building. Specimens were collected in a M.
musculus subterranean nest as low as 168 m near Honokaa in January.
L. segnis ranges into high, dry areas such as Pohakuloa and Waikii (Kilohana
Girl Scout Camp), on Hawaii, where the approximate average annual rainfall is
between 381 and 508 mm. It also ranges into wet areas such as Paauilo, where the
average rainfall amounts to more than 2,540 mm. Eskey (1934) recorded a light
infestation in Olaa, where an average of 3,683 mm of rain falls per year.
Seasonal occurrence in rodent nests is unknown for lack of sufficient data, but
for trapped rats Eskey (1934) made the general statement that at the highest
altitudes from where his data were collected, L. segnis was most prevalent during
“late spring,” and below 1,500 feet (457 m) the greatest numbers were found during
the “late winter months.” For trapped mice he reported that the least infestation
was during August and September. On the whole, our data from mice trapped in two
localities in the Hamakua District more closely approach his statement regarding the
time of maximum indices. In a Eucalyptus plantation 3 km SSW of Kukuihaele, 564
m, where we have data for March-October 1961, the mean number of mouse fleas on
M. musculus was highest during June-August with a maximum of 14.0 (40% males).
For R. exulans the flea index was highest during May at 2.7. In cane field 101b at
Kukuihaele, 270-299 m, for which we have data for October 1959 through April
1961, the index for M. musculus was highest during January-May 1960 with a
maximum of 1.9 (29% males) during February. For R. exulans the index was highest
during April-July 1960 with a maximum of 0.3 in May.
The true host of L. segnis is M. musculus. Secondary hosts, which may be true
hosts in some localities, are R. norvegicus and R. rattus.
Eskey (1934) pooled species of rats in each locality. For example, on Hawaii he
trapped R. exulans, R. norvegicus, and R. rattus, so it is impossible to know if all
three species were infested in all localities. In central Maui, however, he reported
that R. norvegicus was absent from the lowlands, and only sparsely present in the
upland Kula zone. He was first to record L. segnis from mongooses, but did not
specify whether they were from Maui, Hawaii, or both islands.
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
LITERATURE CITED
ADAMSON, A.M.
1939. Review of the fauna of the Marquesas Islands and discussion of its origin.
Bishop Mus. Bull. 159:1-93.
ALICATA, J.E.
1942. Experimental transmission of endemic typhus fever by the sticktight flea,
Echidnophaga gallinacea. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 32:57-60.
1967. Parasitic infections of man and animals in Hawaii. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta.
Tech. Bull. No. 61, 138 p. (imprint date: 1964).
ANONYMOUS
1935. Epidemiological study of plague in the Hawaiian Islands. Pub. Hlth. Rep.
50:255-57.
BANKO, W.E. & N. WILSON
1968. Notes on the mammals of Kipahulu Valley Maui, Hawaii. Elepaio
29:29-3 1.
BARNUM, C.C.
1930. Rat control in Hawaii. Haw. Planters’ Rec. 34:421-43.
BLUMENSTOCK, D.I. & S. PRICE
1967. Climates of the states: Hawaii. Climatography of the United States, No.
60-51. Dept. of Commerce, Wash. 27 p.
BONNET, D.D.
1948. Certain aspects of medical entomology in Hawaii. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc.
13:225-33.
BRIDWELL, J.C.
1917. Notes and exhibitions. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 3:288.
BRYAN, W.A.
1915. Natural History of Hawaii, being an account of the . .. native and
introduced plants and animals of the group. Hawaiian Gazette Co., Ltd.,
Honolulu. 596 p.
BUXTON, P.A.
1928. Insects of Samoa. Siphonaptera. British Museum (Natural History). Pt. 7,
Fasc. 2:53-54.
BUXTON, P.A. & G.H.E. HOPKINS
1927. Researches in Polynesia and Melanesia, . . .. London School Hyg. Trop.
Med. Mem. Ser. No. 1:51-124.
CAMPBELL, A.
1816. A Voyage Round the World, from 1806 to 1812; in which . . . the
Sandwich Islands, were visited. Constable, Edinburgh. 288 p.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 39
COLE, L.C.
1945. The effect of temperature on the sex ratio of Xenopsylla cheopis
recovered from live rats. Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1337-42.
COLE, L.C. & J.A. KOEPKE
1947a. Problems of interpretation of the data of rodent-ectoparasite surveys. Pub.
Hith. Rep. Suppl. No. 202:1-24.
1947b. A study of rodent ectoparasites in Honolulu, T.H. Pub. Hlth. Rep. Suppl.
No. 202:25-41.
1947c. A study of rodent-ectoparasites in Savannah, Georgia. Pub. Hlth. Rep.
Suppl. No. 202:42-59.
DEVICK, W.S.
1968. Rodent plague in Hawaii. Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc. — Rodents as
factors in disease and economic loss. East-West Center, Honolulu, pp.
137-45.
DOOLITTLE, S.E.
1941. Endemic typhus fever in Hawaii. Ann. Intern. Med. 14:2091-114.
DUNNET, G.M.
1964. Distribution and host relationships of fleas in the Antarctic and
Subantarctic, pp. 223-38. In: R. Carrick et al., eds., Biologie Antarctique.
Hermann, Paris.
ESKEY, C.R.
1933. Research now in progress in the Hawaiian Islands on plague transmission .
.., pp. 7-10. Jn: S.B. Grubbs, chmn., The economic and sanitary
importance of rats. J. Pan-Pacif. Res. Inst. 8:1-16.
1934. Epidemiological study of plague in the Hawaiian Islands. Pub. Hlth. Bull.
No. 213, 70 p.
EWING, H.E.
1924. A collection of fleas from the Island of Hawaii. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash.
26:209-10.
FORD-ROBERTSON, J. de C. & P.C. BULL
1966. Some parasites of the kiore, Rattus exulans, on Little Barrier and Hen
Islands, New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. 9:221-24.
FULLAWAY, D.T.
1922. Notes and exhibitions. Insects collected at Waimea, Hawaii. Proc. Haw.
Ent. Soc. 5:11-12.
1959. Notes and exhibitions. Insect parasites of birds. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc.
epee.
FULLAWAY, D.T. & N.L.H. KRAUSS
1945. Common Insects of Hawaii. Tongg Pub. Co., Honolulu. 228 p.
40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
GROSS, B.
1961. Observations on rodent plague in Hawaii (Abstr.). Proc. Ninth Pacif. Sci.
Congr. Pacif. Sci. Assoc. Bangkok, Thailand, 1957. 19:53.
GROSS, B. & D.D. BONNET
1951. Plague in the Territory of Hawaii II. Plague surveillance, Hamakua
District, Island of Hawaii. Pub. Hith. Rep. 66:1541-49.
HAAS, G.E.
1965a. Comparative suitability of the four murine rodents of Hawaii as hosts for
Xenopsylla vexabilis and X. cheopis (Siphonaptera). J. Med. Ent. 2:75-83.
1965b. Temperature and humidity in the microhabitat of rodent fleas in Hawaiian
cane fields. J. Med. Ent. 2:313-16.
1966a. Cat flea-mongoose relationships in Hawaii. J. Med. Ent. 2:321-26.
1966b. A technique for estimating the total number of rodent fleas in cane fields
in Hawaii. J. Med. Ent. 2:392-94.
1969. Quantitative relationships between fleas and rodents in a Hawaiian cane
field. Pacif. Sci. 23:70-82.
HAAS, G.E., P.Q. TOMICH & N. WILSON
1971. The flea in early Hawaii. Haw. J. Hist. 5:59-74.
HAAS, G.E., & N. WILSON
1967. Pulex simulans and P. irritans on dogs in Hawaii (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae).
J. Med. Ent. 4:25-30.
HAMPTON, B.C.
1945. Plague infection reported in the Territory of Hawaii during 1944 and
summary of human cases, 1899-1944. Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1365-68.
HERMS, W.B.
1939. Medical Entomology. 3rd ed. Macmillan Co., N.Y. 582 p.
HERMS, W.B. & M.T. JAMES
1961. Medical Entomology. 5th ed. Macmillan Co., N.Y. 616 p.
HOPKINS, G.H.E.
1961. Insects of Micronesia Siphonaptera. Bishop Mus. Insects Micronesia
14:91-107.
HOPKINS, G.H.E. & M. ROTHSCHILD ,
1953. An Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of Fleas
(Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History), Vol. 1. Tungidae
and Pulicidae. Trustees British Museum, London. 361 p.
ILLINGWORTH, J.F.
1915a. Hen fleas. Xestopsylla gallinacea (Westw.). Haw. Forester Agr. 12:130-32.
1915b. Entomological Program. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 3:113.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 41
1915c. Notes on the habits and control of the chicken flea (Echidnophaga
gallinacea Westwood). J. Econ. Ent. 8:492-95.
1916. Notes on the hen flea (““Echidnophaga gallinacea”’ Westw.). Proc. Haw.
Ent. Soc. 3:252-54.
1923. Insect fauna of hen manure. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 5:270-73.
JOHNSON, P.T.
1961. A revision of the species of Monopsyllus Kolenati in North America
(Siphonaptera, Ceratophyllidae). U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. No. 1227, 69
p.
JORDAN, K.
1925. New Siphonaptera. Novit. Zool. 32:96-112.
1932. Anew Xenopsylla from Hawaii. Novit. Zool. 38:264-66.
1936. Two new Australian fleas. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 61:184-85.
1942. On Parapsyllus and some closely related genera of Siphonaptera. Eos
18:7-29.
JOYCE, C.R.
1968. Rodent quarantine problems and the international sanitary regulations.
Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc. — Rodents as factors in disease and
economic loss. East-West Center, Honolulu, pp. 160-64.
KARTMAN, L.
1954. Observations on 7rypanosoma lewisi and Grahamella sp. in the blood of
rats from the Hamakua District, Island of Hawaii. J. Parasit. 40:571-79.
KARTMAN, L. & R.P. LONERGAN
1955. Wild-rodent-flea control in rural areas of an enzootic plague region in
Hawaii. Bull. Wild. Hlth. Org. 13:49-68.
KARTMAN, L., F.M. PRINCE & S.F. QUAN
1956. Studies on Pasteurella pestis in fleas. Comparative plague-vector efficiency
of Xenopsylla vexabilis hawaiiensis and Xenopsylla cheopis. Bull. Wld.
Hith. Org. 14:681-704.
KLEIN, J.M.
1971. La faune des puces du Cambodge (Siphonaptera). Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M. Ent.
Méd. Parasit. 9:223-38.
LINK, V.B. ,
1955. A history of plague in the United States of America. Pub. Hlth. Monogr.
No. 26, 120 p.
LUOMALA, K.
1960. The native dog in the Polynesian system of values, pp. 190-240. Jn: S.
Diamond, ed., Culture in History (Paul Radin Birthday Vol.). Columbia
Univ. Press, N.Y.
42 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
McCOY, G.W. & D.S. BOWMAN
1914. Plague in Hawaii with special reference to its occurrence on the northern
coast of the Island of Hawaii. Pub. Hith. Rep. 29:1629-36.
MALLEY, N. & W. DEVICK
1968. A synopsis of flea ecology studies in Hawaii. Asia-Pacif. Interchange Proc.
— Rodents as factors in disease and economic loss. East-West Center,
Honolulu, pp. 273-83.
MEYER, K.F. |
1963. Plague, pp. 527-87, Jn: Hull, T.G., ed., Diseases Transmitted from Animals
to Man. 5th ed. Thomas, Springfield.
MITCHELL, C.J.
1964. Ectoparasitic and commensal arthropods occurring on the rats of Manoa
Valley, Oahu (Acarina, Anoplura, and Siphonaptera). Proc. Haw. Ent.
Soc. 18:413-15.
MITZMAIN, M.B.
1909. List of the Siphonaptera of California. Can. Ent. 41:197-204.
MORR, C.O.
1951. Entomological background of the distribution of murine typhus and
murine plague in the United States. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 31:355-72.
MUMFORD, E.P.
1942. Native rats and the plague in the Pacific. Amer. Sci. 30:213-17.
PEMBERTON, C.E.
1925. The field rat in Hawaii and its control. Bull. Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar
Planters’ Assoc. Ent. Ser. Bull. No. 17, 46 p.
1934. Some future work for the entomologist in Hawaii. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc.
8:505-14.
1943. Insects and other arthropods of medical interest in Hawaii. Haw. Med. J.
2:191-94.
1945. The species of rodents and fleas in Hawaii. Proc. Haw. Acad. Sci. 16th
Ann. Meet. 1940-41, p. 14.
POLLITZER, R.
1954. Plague. World Health Organization, Geneva, Monogr. Ser. No. 22, 698 p.
ROTHSCHILD, N.C.
1910. A synopsis of the fleas found on Mus norvegicus decumanus, Mus rattus
alexandrinus and Mus musculus. Bull. Ent. Res. 1:89-98.
RUMREICH, A.S. & J.A. KOEPKE
1945. Epidemiological significance of seasonal variations in rodent-ectoparasite
distribution. Pub. Hlth. Rep. 60:1421-28.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 43
SAKAGUTI, K. axe
1962. A Monograph of the Siphonaptera of Japan. Nippon Printing & Publishing
Co., Ltd., Osaka. 255 p.
SAKAGUTI, K. & E.W. JAMESON, Jr.
1962. The Siphonaptera of Japan. Pacif. Ins. Monogr. 3:1-169.
SANKASUWAN, V., P. PONGPRADIT, P. BODHIDATTA, K. THONGLONGYA &
P.E. WINTER
1969. Murine typhus in Thailand. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 63:639-43.
SCHWARTZ, C.W. & E.R. SCHWARTZ
1949. A reconnaissance of the game birds in Hawaii. State Haw., Bd.
Commissioners Agr. & Forestry. 168 p.
SIMMONS, J.S., T.F. WHAYNE, G.W. ANDERSON, H.M. HORACK &
COLLABORATORS
1944. Global Epidemiology, A geography of disease and sanitation. Vol. 1, Pt. 2.
The Pacific Area. Lippincott, Phila. 504 p.
SINOTO, Y.H.
1968. Position of the Marquesas Islands in East Polynesia Prehistory, pp. 111-18.
In: I. Yawata & Y.H. Sinoto, eds., Prehistoric Culture in Oceania.
Symposium 11th Pacif. Sci. Congr., Tokyo, 1966. Bishop Mus. Press,
Honolulu. 179 p.
SMIT, F.G.A.M.
1958. A preliminary note on the occurrence of Pulex irritans L. and Pulex
simulans Baker in North America. J. Parasit. 44:523-26.
1964. Insects of Campbell Island. Siphonaptera, Pacif. Ins. Monogr. 7:330-34.
1965. Siphonaptera of New Zealand. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z., Zool. 7:1-50.
1970. A new species of flea from the Galapagos Islands. Ent. Ber. 30:244-47.
SMITH, J.G.
1908. Summary of investigations, pp. 9-24. In: Ann. Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta.
for 1907.
STARK, H.E. & L. KARTMAN
1957. Studies on Pasteurella pestis in fleas VI. The laboratory culture of
pin vexabilis hawaiiensis Jordan, 1932. Amer. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
:707-11.
STEWART, M.A.
1935a. Some Society Islands Siphonaptera. Bishop Mus. Bull. 113:119.
1935b. Marquesan Siphonaptera. Bishop Mus. Bull. 114:210.
SUGGS, R.C.
1960. The Island Civilizations of Polynesia. Mentor: Ancient Civilizations. New
American Library of World Literature, Inc., N.Y. 256 p.
ad Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
_SWEZEY, O.H. & E.H. BRYAN, Jr.
1927. Notes on some forest insects of Molokai. Proc. Haw. Ent. Soc. 6:411-22.
TOMICH, P.Q.
1969. Mammals in Hawaii: a synopsis and notational bibliography. Bishop Mus.
Spec. Pub. 57. 238 p.
TOMICH, P.Q., N. WILSON & C.H. LAMOUREUX
1968. Ecological factors on Manana Island, Hawaii. Pacif. Sci. 22:352-68.
TRAUB, R., A.B. MIRZA, M. NADCHATRAM & E.B. MANN
1970. Survey of Bulolo for fleas and trombiculid mites. Papua New Guinea Med.
J. 13:62-64.
VAN DINE, D.L.
1908. Report of the entomologist, pp. 25-51. Jn: Ann. Rep. Haw. Agr. Exp. Sta.
for 1907.
VAN DINE, D.L. & V.A. NORGAARD
1908. Abstract of preliminary report on insects affecting live stock in Hawaii.
Proc. Haw. Live Stock Breeders’ Assn. 5th Ann. Meet., Nov. 18, 1907. pp.
19-70.
WILCOX, E.V.
1915. Summary of investigations, miscellaneous, pp. 19-24. Jn: Ann. Rep. Haw.
Agr. Exp. Sta. for 1914.
WILSON, N.
1972. Notes on some Ctenocephalides from Micronesia (Siphonaptera:
Pulicidae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 74: 184.
WU, C.Y.
1936. Insect Vectors, Chapt. 7, pp. 249-308. In: L.-T. Wu, J.W.H. Chun, R.
Pollitzer & C.Y. Wu. Plague: A manual for medical and public health
workers. Weishengshu National Quarantine Service, Shanghai Station. 547
p.
tet
fh Ricca rag iat
¥.
eo aore
46
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
APPENDIX
A. Names of hosts
Branta sandvicensis (Vigors)
Diomedea immutabilis Rothschild
Gallus gallus (Linnaeus)
Lophortyx californicus (Shaw)
Passer domesticus (Linnaeus)
Puffinus pacificus (Gmelin)
Puffinus tenuirostris (Temminck)
Bos taurus Linnaeus
Canis familiaris Linnaeus
Felis catus Linnaeus
Herpestes auropunctatus (Hodgson)
Homo sapiens Linnaeus
Leporillus conditor (Sturt)
Mus musculus Linnaeus
Oryctolagus cuniculus (Linnaeus)
Rattus exulans (Peale)
Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout)
Rattus rattus (Linnaeus)
Rattus tunneyi (Thomas)
Sus scrofa Linnaeus
Host synonymy
Felis domestica Erxleben
Herpestes birmanicus Thomas
Leporillus jonesi Thomas
Rattus alexandrinus (Desmarest)
Rattus culmorum (Thomas & Dollman)
Rattus [exulans] hawaiiensis
Rattus hawaiiensis Stone
Hawaiian goose, nene
Laysan albatross
chicken
California quail
house sparrow, English sparrow
wedge-tailed shearwater
short-tailed shearwater
cattle
dog
cat
small Indian mongoose
man
stick-nest rat
house mouse
European rabbit
Hawaiian rat, Polynesian rat
Norway rat, brown rat
roof rat, black rat
Tunney’s rat
pig
F. catus
Hf, auropunctatus
L. conditor
R. rattus
R. tunneyi
R. exulans
R. exulans
Rattus norvegicus may have included R. exulans before 1932.
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 47
SOURCES OF FIGURES
(Drawings, other than originals, modified to various degrees)
Originals: Figs. 1, 23-25, 27-34.
Sakaguti and Jameson, 1962: Figs. 6,11, 15.
Smit, in Hopkins and Rothschild, 1953: Figs. 21, 26.
Smit, in Pollitzer, 1954: Figs. 2-5, 7, 8, 12-14, 16-20, 22, 35-40.
Smit, 1958: Figs. 9, 10.
48
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Echidnophaga gallinacea (Westwood)
Fig. 2. Head, thorax, tergum I, and fore coxa, ?
Fig. 3. Modified abdominal segment IX, ¢
Fig. 4. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
50
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Pulex irritans Linnaeus
Fig. 5. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, d
Fig. 6. Meso- and metathorax, d
Fig. 7. Modified abdominal segment IX, ¢
52
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Pulex irritans Linnaeus
Fig. 8. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
Fig. 9. Aedeagus
Pulex simulans Baker
Fig. 10. Aedeagus
ter ee
are.
Borers
AEST be
54
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouché)
Fig. 11. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, 6
Fig. 12. Head and pronotum, ?
Fig. 13. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 14. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
56
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Ctenocephalides canis (Curtis)
Fig. 15. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, d
Fig. 16. Head and pronotum, ?
Fig. 17. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 18. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
58 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Xenopsylla cheopis (Rothschild)
Fig. 19. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, 6
Fig. 20. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 21. Aedeagal apodeme
Fig. 22. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
Pow nv aete™
e
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Xenopsylla vexabilis Jordan
Fig. 23. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, ¢
Fig. 24. Meso- and metathorax, ?
Fig. 25. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 26. Aedeagal apodeme
Fig. 27. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
d.a.st.IX
KO Rive
62
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Parapsyllus laysanensis Wilson, n. sp.
Fig. 28. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, ?
Fig. 29. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 30. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
fr.tub.
FG
Yi
\ ie =
4 » ne
owt te eee ewe
ao
. ae
Lee a,
femme?
29
t. Vill
an.sty.
st. Vill
d. b. or
64 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Parapsyllus laysanensis Wilson, n. sp.
Fig. 31. Aedeagus
Parapsyllus taylori Jordan
Fig. 32. Aedeagus
Specimen from Furneaux Island, Tasmania, ex Puffinus tenuirostris,
Nov. 1912, R. N. Atkinson (Brit. Mus. 1923.615).
66 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Parapsyllus laysanensis Wilson, n. sp.
Fig. 33. Sternum VII and spermatheca showing variation
Parapsyllus taylori Jordan
Fig. 34. Sternum VII and spermatheca showing variation
Specimens with same data as Fig. 32.
68 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Nosopsyllus fasciatus (Bosc)
Fig. 35. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, 6
Fig. 36. Modified abdominal segment IX, 6
Fig. 37. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
70
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Leptopsylla segnis (Schonherr)
Fig. 38. Head, prothorax, and fore coxa, 6
Fig. 39. Modified abdominal segment IX, ¢
Fig. 40. Terminal segments and genitalia, ?
72 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
INDEX
Valid scientific names are in roman type; synonyms and former combinations
are in italics. Boldface page numbers indicate primary treatment of species of
Siphonaptera.
albatross, Laysan, 33, 46
nest, 33. See also Diomedea immutabilis
nest, 8, 32
alexandrinus (Rattus), 21, 46
anisus (Monopsyllus), 4, 5
auropunctatus (Herpestes). See Herpestes
auropunctatus
beaches, 8, 18
birmanicus (Herpestes), 11, 17, 46
Bos taurus, 8, 16, 18, 46
Branta sandvicensis, 8, 11, 46. See also nene,
11
californicus (Lophortyx), 8, 11, 46
Canis familiaris, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
18, 19, 22. See also dog
shed, 8. See also dog shed
canis
(Ctenocephalides). See Ctenocephalides
canis
(Ctenocephalus), 4, 18, 19
(Pulex), 19
cat, 10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19. See also Felis
catus; F. domestica
cattle. See Bos taurus, 8, 16, 18
catus (Felis). See Felis catus
Ceratophyllidae, 7, 8, 33
Ceratophyllus fasciatus, 33
cheopis
(Loemopsylla), 20
(Pulex), 20
(Xenopsylla). See Xenopsylla cheopis
chicken, 10, 11. See also Gallus gallus, 8, 11
conditor (Leporillus), 46
Ctenocephalides
canis, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 16, 18, 19, 20; figs.
15-18
felis, 4,15, 18
felis felis, 7, 8,9, 15, 18, 19; figs. 11-14
orientis, 18, 19
Ctenocephalus
canis, 4, 18, 19
felis, 15
Ctenopsyllus
musculi, 35
segnis , 36
culmorum (Rattus), 27, 46
cuniculus (Oryctolagus). See Oryctolagus
cuniculus
Diomedea immutabilis, 46
nest, 8, 32. See also albatross
dog, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20. See
also Canis familiaris
shed, 13, 14, 15, 19. See also Canis
familiaris shed, 8
dog and cat flea, common, 18
dog flea, 18, 19, 20. See also Ctenocephalides
canis
domestica (Felis), 17, 46
domesticus (Passer), 8, 11. See also sparrow,
Echidnophaga
gallinacea, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; figs. 2-4.
See also sticktight flea, 11, 14
gallinacea gallinacea, 10
familiaris (Canis). See Canis familiaris
fasciata (Nosopsylla), 33
fasciatus (Nosopsyllus). See Nosopsyllus
fasciatus
Felis
catus, 8, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 36. See also
cat
domestica, 17, 46. See also cat
felis
(Ctenocephalides). See Ctenocephalides
felis
(Ctenocephalus), 15
felis felis | (Ctenocephalides). See
Ctenocephalides felis felis
Felis (Pulex), 15
gallinacea
(Echidnophaga). See
gallinacea
(Sarcopsylla), 10
(Xestopsylla), 10
gallinacea gallinacea (Echidnophaga), 10
gallinaceus (Sarcopsyllus), 10
gallus (Gallus), 8, 11. See also chicken, 10,
11; poultry
buildings & yards, 8, 10, 11
goose, Hawaiian, 46
gwynl
(Polygenis), 4
(Rhopalopsyllus), 4
Echidnophaga
hawaiiensis (Rattus), 10,21, 25, 46
nest, 25. See also Rattus exulans nest
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 73
hawaiiensis (Xenopsylla). See Xenopsylla
hawaiiensis; Xenopsylla vexabilis
hawaiiensis
Hawaii Island, localities on:
Ahualoa, 17, 21, 25, 34, 36
Captain Cook, 14, 21
Glenwood, 14
Haina, 13, 14, 15, 26
Hakalau, 14
Halaula, 11, 17,21
Halaula School, 14
Halawa, 14
Halepiula, 34, 36
Halepohaku, 36
Hamakua Coast, 18, 19, 21, 22
Hamakua District, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 23,
25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 34, 367.37
Hanaipoe, 13, 36
Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, 26, 28,
34, 36
Hawi, 14, 15, 17, 36
Hilo, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21, 25, 28, 36
Holualoa, 14
Honalo, 14
Honaunau, 14, 15, 17
Honohina, 14
Honokaa, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22,
23, 25, 26, 34, 36, 37
Honokahau, 14
Honomu, 14, 26
Hookena, 14
Humuula, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20
Iolehaechae Camp (Kukaiau Ranch), 28
Kaapahu Homesteads, 26, 34
Kahaluu, 14, 17, 26
Kahawailiilii Gulch, 34, 36
Kahua Ranch, 13
Kailua, 14
Kaimu, 14, 17
Kainaliu, 14
Ka Lae, 22
Kalapana, 14
Kalopa, 11, 17, 21, 25, 34, 36
Kalopa Gulch, 26
Kamuela, 13, 14, 15, 17, 28. See also
Waimea, 11
Kapaau, 14, 17
Kapoho, 14
Kapulena, 13, 14, 26, 34, 36
Kaumana, 14, 17, 19
Kaunamano Gulch, 21, 25, 36
Kawaihae, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 22
Keaau. See Olaa
Kealakekua, 14
Kealia, 14
Keanakolu, 17, 34, 36
Keauhou, 14
Keauhou Ranch, 14
Keaukaha, 14
Kilauea Military Camp, 14, 34, 36
Kohala Mill, 14, 17, 26
Kohala Mountain, 28, 34, 36
Kukaiau, 11, 14, 17, 21, 25, 34, 35, 36
Kukaiau Ranch, 11, 17, 18, 26, 28, 34, 36
Kukuihaele, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22,
25, 26, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37
Kupaahu, 14, 22
Kurtistown, 14
Laupahoehoe, 14, 17, 21, 25, 28, 34
Lower Pohakea, 11, 17, 21, 25, 34, 36
Mahukona, 14, 17, 22
Makahalau, 14, 22
Makahalau Camp, 11, 17, 22, 34, 36
Makapala, 14, 22
Mana, 34, 36
Milolii, 14
Mountain View, 14, 15, 17
Naalehu, 14
Napoopoo, 11, 14, 15, 17, 36
Ninole, 14
Niulii, 11, 14, 15, 17
North Kohala District, 17
North Kona District, 28
Olaa, 11, 14, 17, 21, 25, 28, 34, 35, 36,
37
Onomea, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 21
Ookala, 13, 14, 15, 17, 26
Paauhau, 14, 15,21, 25, 26, 28
Paauilo, 13, 14, 15, 17, 22, 34, 35, 36, 37
Pahala, 14
Pahoa, 14, 17
Palihooukapapa, 17, 34, 36
Papaaloa, 14
Papaikou, 14, 17
Parker Ranch, 15
Pepeekeo, 14, 21, 25
Piihonua, 14, 15
Pohakea Ranch, 14
Pohakuloa, 11, 13, 14, 15, 34, 35, 36, 37
Pohoiki, 14
Pololu Valley, 23, 26
Puako, 11, 14, 15, 17
Puna District, 17
Punaluu, 14, 17
Puu Keanui, 34, 36
Puu Kihe, 11, 12, 18, 34, 35, 36
Puu Laau, 13
Puu Mali, 18
Puu Waawaa Ranch, 13, 14, 22, 26, 34, 37
Puuanahulu, 13, 14, 15, 18, 22, 36
South Cape. See Ka Lae, 22
South Hilo District, 11, 17, 34, 36
South Kona District, 17
Umikoa, 11, 13, 14, 18, 34, 37
Upolu Point, 22
Upper Pohakea, 17, 25, 28, 34, 36
74 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
Waiakea Camp No. 6, 14
Waiakeauka, 18
Waikii, 11, 14, 18, 37
Waimea, 11. See also Kamuela
Wainaia Gulch, 22, 26
Waiohinu, 14, 18
Waipio, 17, 22
Waipio Valley, 14, 17, 18, 22, 26, 28
Wood Valley, 14
Hawaiian rat flea, 26. See also Xenopsylla
vexabilis
Herpestes
auropunctatus, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18,
21, 22, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 46. See
also mongoose
den, 8, See also mongoose den, 17,18
birmanicus, 11, 17, 46
Homo sapiens, 8, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, 26. See
also man, 14, 18, 21
houses & yards, 8, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22,
26
human flea, 13, 14, 18. See also Pulex
irritans
immutabilis (Diomedea), 46. See also
Diomedea immutabilis nest, 8, 32;
albatross
irritans (Pulex), 12. See also Pulex irritans;
human flea
jonesi (Leporillus), 27, 46
Kauai, localities on:
Haena, 10, 14, 16
Hanapepe, 10, 16
Kalaheo, 16
Kaumakani, 15
Kawaihau District, 21,25
Kilauea, 16
Kipu, 16
Kokee, 15, 16, 36
Koloa, 16
Koloa District, 21, 25
Lawai, 16
Lihue, 16
Makaweli, 16
Omao, 16
Puhi, 16
Wailua, 15, 16
Waimea District, 10, 16, 21, 25, 36
Lanai, locality on:
Lanai City, 17
Laysan, locality on, 32, 33
laysanensis Wilson, n. sp. (Parapsyllus), 5,
7, 8, 9, 3A; 3S ee ss
Leporillus
conditor, 46
jonesi, 27, 46
Leptopsylla
musculi, 35
segnis, 7, 8, 9, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37; figs.
38-40
Leptopsyllidae, 7, 8, 35
Loemopsylla cheopis, 20
longicornis group (Parapsyllus), 31
Lophortyx californicus, 8, 11. See also
California quail, 12
man, 14, 18, 21, 23, 31. See also Homo
sapiens
Manana Island, locality on, 4, 11, 17, 19, 21,
23
Maui, localities on:
central Maui, 17, 21, 23, 25, 28, 37
Haiku. 11, 47,21, 25, 33, 36
Haleakala Crater, 11, 17
Haleakala National Park, 36
Kaheka area, 17
Kahului, 11, 21, 25, 28, 33, 36
Kailua, 11, 17, 21, 25, 33, 36
Keokea, 11, 17,21
Kihei, 11, 17
Kipahulu Valley, 33
Kula, 11, 17, 21, 255 33, 36
Kula area, 11, 17, 23, 28, 33,:35;:36237
Lahaina, 11
Lahaina area, 17, 21
Lower Paia, 11, 17, 21, 25, 33, 36
Makawao, 11, 17, 21, 25, 33, 36
Makawao District, 11, 17, 21, 25
Olinda, f 1; 17, 295.25;33; 36
Paia. See Upper Paia
Puunene, 115 17,21, 25, 28, 33
Upper Paia, 11, 17, 21, 25,33, 36
Waiakoa, 17
Wailuku, 11, 17,21, 25
Molokai, localities on:
Honomuni, 17
Hoolehua, 17
Kaunakakai, 11, 17
Maunaloa, 17
McVeigh’s cabin, 17
Waikolu Valley, 17
mongoose, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 31,
Ss SF. See also Herpestes
auropunctatus
den, 17, 18. See also Herpestes
auropunctatus den, 8
Monopsyllus anisus, 4, 5 |
mouse, house; 12, 19, 23, 35,.36;) 37. See
also Mus musculus
nest, 29. See also Mus musculus nest
Haas, Wilson & Tomich: Hawaiian Siphonaptera 75
mouse flea, 37. See also Leptopsylla segnis
murine typhus, 34
musculi
(Ctenopsyllus), 35
(Leptopsylla), 35
Mus musculus, 8, 11, 12, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26,
28, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37. See also
mouse
nest, 8,22, 25, 26,29, 30, 36457
nene, 11, 46. See also Branta sandvicensis, 8,
11
nesiotes (Xenopsylla), 27
northern rat flea, 34, 35. See also
Nosopsyllus fasciatus
norvegicus (Rattus). See Rattus norvegicus
Nosopsylla fasciata, 33
Nosopsyllus
(Ceratophyllus) fasciatus , 33
fasciatus, 7, 8, 9, 33, 34, 35,°37; fies.
35-37
Oahu, localities on:
Aiea, 10, 16, 21, 25
Ewa Beach, 16
Hickam Air Force Base, 16
Honolulu, 4, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19,
21, 22, 25; 33; 36
Kailua, 10, 16
Kaneohe, 16
Kaneohe Marine Corps Air Station, 16
Kipapa, 10, 16, 21, 25
Koko Head, 10, 16
Manoa Valley, 11, 16, 21
Pali, 25
Red Hill Navy Reservation, 16
Tantalus, 16, 21
Wahiaivu, 21
Wahiawa, 21
Waimanalo, 10, 16, 21, 25
Waipahu, 10, 16, 21, 25
Oriental rat flea, 22, 23. See also Xenopsylla
cheopis
Oriental-Pacific rat flea, 26. See also
Xenopsylla vexabilis
orientis (Ctenocephalides), 18, 19
Oryctolagus cuniculus, 8, 11, 17, 18, 21, 22.
See also rabbit, 4, 19
pacificus (Puffinus), 32, 33, 46
nest, 8, 32
Parapsyllus, 33
laysanensis Wilson, n. sp., 5, 7, 8, 9, 31,
33; figs. 28-31, 33
longicornis group, 31
taylori, 33; figs. 32, 34
Passer domesticus, 8, 11, 46. See also English
sparrow, 10
nest, 8, 11. see also sparrow nest, 10
Pasteurella pestis. See Yersinia pestis, 31;
plague
pig, 12, 14. See also Sus scrofa, 8, 11, 13, 15
plague, 4, 12, 22, 23; 25, 28; 31. see also
Yersinia pestis, 31
Polygenis gwyni, 4
poultry, 11, 12. See also chicken
buildings, roosts & yards, 8, 10, 11
Puffinus, 33
pacificus, 32, 33, 46
nest, 8, 32, 33
tenuirostris, 46, 69
Spp.,.2)
Pulex
canis, 19
cheopis, 20
fasciatus, 33
Felis, 15
irritans, 4,7, 8,9, 12, 13, 14, 15; figs. 5-9.
See also human flea, 13, 18
segnis, 35
serraticeps, 18, 19
simulans, 4, 7, 8,9, 13, 14, 15; fig. 10
SD. 7 oto
Pulicidae, 7, 8, 10
quail, California, 12. See also Lophortyx
californicus, 8, 11
rabbit, European, 4, 19. See also Oryctolagus
cuniculus
tat. DO iol ie. bas 36 1 2 ees 25,
25:21, 28. 30, 35,33, ' SS, 35736.
See also Rattus
black, 46. See also Rattus rattus
brown, 21, 46. See also Rattus norvegicus
Hawaiian, 21, 26, 46. See also Rattus
exulans
Norway, 21, 23, 25, 26, 46. See also
Rattus norvegicus
Polynesian, 46. See also Rattus exulans
roof, 46. See also Rattus rattus
stick-nest, 46
Tunney’s, 46
Rattus
alexandrinus, 21, 46
culmorum, 27, 46
exulans; 4, 5.8. 10, 11,'16,°17,/18, 21,
22, 2h, 29.1 205 21 2ey 20900, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 46
peste. 8. 17, 18, 22. 25.20, 29,30, 34,
35, 36, 37
hawaiiensis, 10,21, 25, 46
nest, 25
norvegicus, 4, 8, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 19,
Oty 2a Bor 20> Aeerdos OF; 20; 005
37, 46
nest B27 ..25. 26. 34, SOpa7
76 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 5, 1972
rattus, 4,8, 10,11, 16, 18, 21,22, 23, 25,
26, 28, 34, 35, 36, 37, 46
nest, 8, 25, 26
tunneyi, 46
$p.47, 21925.3336
Rhopalopsyllidae, 7, 8, 31
Rhopalopsyllus gwyni, 4
rodents, 17,19, 21,22, 25, 26, 30, 34,36,
37. See also Mus musculus; Rattus
sandvicensis (Branta), 8, 11, 46. See also
nene, 11
sapiens (Homo), 8, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, 26.
See also man, 14, 18, 21
Sarcopsylla gallinacea , 10
Sarcopsyllus gallinaceus, 10
scrofa (Sus). See Sus scrofa; pig
sea birds, 33
segnis
(Leptopsylla). See Leptopsylla segnis
(Pulex), 35
serraticeps (Pulex), 18, 19
shearwater, short-tailed, 46. See also Puffinus
tenuirostris, 69
simulans (Pulex). See Pulex simulans
sparrow, English or house, 10. See also Passer
domesticus
sticktight flea, 11, 14. See also Echidnophaga
gallinacea, 7,8,9, 10,11, 12
Sus scrofa, 8, 11, 13, 15. See also pig
taurus (Bos), 8, 16, 18, 46
taylori (Parapsyllus), 33; figs. 32, 34
tenuirostris (Puffinus), 46, 69
tunneyi (Rattus), 46
typhus, murine, 34
vexabilis (Xenopsylla). See Xenopsylla
vexabilis
vexabilis hawaiiensis (Xenopsylla), 24, 25,
27. See also Xenopsylla vexabilis
Xenopsylla
eheopis 4:5: 7... 6. 9, 20, 22,. 23.-.25,
26, 31; figs. 19-22
hawaiiensis, 23, 24, 27
nesiotes, 27
wexabilise 4.15. 7, “8; 9. 22, 23, 24,
29, 20,401, 28,0 29) 30). 31; figs.
23-27
vexabilis hawaiiensis, 24, 25, 27
Xestopsylla gallinacea, 10
Yersinia pestis, 31. See also plague, 4,
LZ dan 2a 29520, 3d
Contributions
of the
American Entomological Institute
Volume 8, Number 6, 1972
mg iy:
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MOSQUITO FAUNA OF
SOUTHEAST ASIA. XI,
THE GENUS CULEX, SUBGENUS EUMELA NOMYIA
THEOBALD IN SOUTHEAST ASIA AND
ADJACENT AREAS.
By
Sunthorn Sirivanakarn
CONTENTS
ee re a ee a A RS SR se aS Oe
PR Nee POY foe a eo Re SO ee A ee ee eee a
CF Ue Oil eS Cee eo ee eee ee ee ee ee ae ee
Sie ee NE a ts ees ee a ks aS ee ee ee ww
KEYS TO GROUPS IN THE ORIENTAL REGION ............
ee ee Ee ee OO ae ok Boe ee Wa le te cw ee
Pete ee es cee wie ae ks ee eee a eS
Bs BEC OTIS BMWAEOS: 6 BIS 6 hi Re we
etn ie Sees Ge ie ae Ke oe ce WR ewe We ee
PGT Ete Ee re ESPOUD 5g ee ere ee lee oe we 8%
ee re ee ee Bn Be: 2k eae le oie a Se
Payee ge ee Oe ee ee ee oe re soe fa: Sue %
pr Ge Be Bs 4 Wek oS a Gs ee ee NS ar Meme Bee aA
BG oer ee OUD 8 ee wh Se ae ee
KEYS TO THE SUBGROUPS AND SPECIES. ...........4.--.
RETAINS ASOT OOD | ea oS a ik Se ee mee
Be. ROC I OM imadvicamentapomendnets os 9k «eye e Be
ORME HS Eis eos a ek ee eR Ne es
Be ee hie ee eee ka OL Re we Oe £) es ek ee
hy, HOT POLIS DOM INANO 6 ee ae ew ee es
WRG CNSIS BUDE LOE 8 Sa a ee a ee le ee ee
EE I pag oe OA ts a sere a an ae a nee ee
DOORS Fe re SESE os ck RTE ERG Swe ene we BON
DOM SATE OCTANE ROAWATOS 5 se ne ke ee ek ewe eels
een Fe a Be rs ee yall ai RR ee
ANE Se Oe ee sR ee eee Ae eee
OF CORIO Ek ie a kw Boa ee ea ew te
ee ee kk ee Be ge ee a Bg Bima ee
Be re Be ola oe, 4 ee A Re! ace ee ee es
DUCTS BOTs bo a RS RO eee ee SR ae
Ro he eee TAO, og oe bk ee aa el ee ee Ie ee es
16. campilunati Carter & Wijesundara. ......-++-+s-e+-s
17. Seine Wien & Sir ivameares ok ke ee a ee
WHASGHE BADETOND 6s oe Ne ee ee 8 Ge aS er ea as: ae
Be ree a i ie a ee ee Oe ee eS Se
Pepe Gite BOER: e's ie 25h tn ew Ke, ELE A ee gh ee
19. teniipaipis Barraud . . 2 2 6 eels ee ee ee fe 8 8 8
Coes ee ge sa a wh a we oy Ue a a
Bi OO BAI see Oe eae eB eS
Do PC A oo a Oe eas oF
23. kiriensis Klein & Sirivanakarn. .......+.-+-eee-s
ORIMAWAC BUDETOU, 2. A. Fhe GReTL NED 6 ww we ew ws
iis Fe ROE EIR 64s ok a ee ee ee ee Re ey Oe © eee
TUES BODETOUD <5 6 se ee a ie ee 8 we ee eee ae ee
Bo. ips Barrawde ss fe Ni BE plete bse eelels eg) Aoi’
DOROTECHSIS SUDEFOUD Oe) 6585 Ee AG Bek A APF UKE Oe ee
26. bokorensis Klein & Sirivanakarn. ........4+sseee-.
COLIC, BEDS POR er ee OE ek ee ee ee
27. otachati Klein & Sirivanakarn ......2-+-+see2eee
undetermined subgroup .....-.-+e+eserececr eee verve
28, wp, LPhalii SOCReR ke FOS 6 ae ewe
ACBNOWLEDGNER TS. Sik a ee ere ew ee we eR le ee eo
OF ie ig a U8 Oke Be i ip | 8 Sg a ee en eee
Pee ie 6 ao, ek ey, Bik we a a ee te ee ee a
APPENDIX .TABLE OF DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT OF THE
ORIENTAL EUMELANOMYIA........ eae aa oe
OOOWWWheE
THE GENUS CULEX, SUBGENUS EUMELANOMYIA
THEOBALD IN SOUTHEAST ASIA AND
ADJACENT AREAS!
By
Sunthorn Sirivanakara’
INTRODUCTION
The subgenus Eumelanomyia, as currently interpreted by Sirivanakarn
(1971) in his proposed reclassification of Neoculex includes practically all
Culex species which were previously placed in the subgenus Mochthogenes and
a number of species in the subgenus Neoculex according to the classification
of Edwards (1932, 1941). The subgenus in the present sense is one of the
largest in Culex with distribution largely restricted to the Ethiopian and
Oriental regions. The most up to date records from the literature (Stone,
Knight and Starcke 1959; Stone 1967, 1970) include approximately 66 nominal
species of which 37 are from the Ethiopian region, 27 from the Oriental re-
gion, 1 from the Papaun part of the Australasian region and 1 from the South
Pacific. For a list of the majority of species currently assigned to Eumelano-
myia, see Sirivanakarn (loc. cit. ).
In the Oriental region, the subgenus is predominantly Indomalayan with an
extension to the west as far as India and Ceylon, to the north and northeast as
far as China, Ryukyu Islands, Japan and Korea and to the east as far as New
Guinea. All of the nominal species described prior to the present work were
treated either as Neoculex or Mochthogenes under which only a small number
was locally revised. Among these, the major studies are: Barraud (1934: 347-
359) who treated 7 species (2 under Neoculex, 5 under Mochthogenes) from
India, Burma and Ceylon; Delfinado (1966: 124-135) who treated 8 species (2
under Neoculex, 6 under Mochthogenes) from the Philippines and Bram (1967:
23-42) who treated 5 species (2 under Neoculex, 3 under Mochthogenes) from
Thailand. Among the short papers, dealing primarily with the descriptions of
species are: Edwards (1923, 1930), Bohart (1953), Bohart and Ingram (1946),
Carter and Wijesundara (1948), Chu (1957), Wattal, Kalra and Khrishnan
(1966), Lien (1968), Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969) and Klein (1970). Nearly all
of the species reported from the areas are known primarily as males; the fe-
males are still obscure or unknown and the immature stages are very incom-
pletely known. The earlier distribution records of most species are extremely
incomplete and often unreliable and no attempt prior to Sirivanakarn (1971) had
been made to determine the affinities of all the various taxa involved.
Following the scheme of reclassification of Neoculex currently proposed by
Sirivanakarn (loc. cit. ), the present study is a revision of the Eumelanomyta
from Southeast Asia. The species which are known only from adjacent areas,
such as India and Ceylon are also included in this revision for comparative
purposes and for characterizing the whole Oriental fauna. The emphasis in
{Pe
This work was supported by Research Contract No. DA-49-193-MD-2672
from the U. S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Office
of Surgeon General, Washington, D. C. 20314.
2Southeast Asia Mosquito Project, Smithsonian Institution, Washington,
D.C. 20560.
2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
this attempt is to diagnose, describe and illustrate all available stages as well
as to determine the affinities and to provide more complete distribution records
of all species within the areas. In this paper, 27 Eumelanomyia species are
recognized and of these, 3 are new and 24 are revalidated and redescribed.
Five of the previously named forms are considered here as synonyms. These
are: chiyutoi Baisas and shrivastavii Wattal, Kalra and Krishnan as synonyms
of foliatus Brug; culionicus Delfinado as a synonym of hinglungensis Chu; tri-
contus Delfinado as a synonym of cataractarum Edwards and lini Lien as a
synonym of okinawae Bohart. Fee es
The material upon which this study has been based consists of numerous
field caught and reared specimens accumulated at the Southeast Asia Mosquito
Project and at the U. S. National Museum. These specimens were obtained
from the collections by the U. S. Army Medical Component, SEATO laboratory
in Thailand; by J. M. Klein of ORSTOM in Cambodia; by personnel of the U. S.
Army Medical unit in Vietnam; by S. Ramalingam's team of collectors, Depart-
ment of Parasitology, University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur in Malaya and
Singapore; by W. V. King, L. E. Rozeboom, K. L. Knight, J. Laffoon,
E. S. Ross, F. E. Baisas, M. Delfinado, G. Alcasid and others in the
Philippines, and by the U. S. Army Medical unit in the Ryukyu Islands. Addi-
tional specimens include the institutional loans and the loans from private
collections made to the Southeast Asia Mosquito Project (SEAMP) by J. C. Lien
in Taiwan; Chicago Museum; California Academy of Science; Philadelphia
Academy of Science; Instituut Voor Tropische Hygiene, Amsterdam; Institute of
Medical Research in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and British Museum, London.
The methods of presentation, terminology and abbreviations used in the
descriptions of adults in general follow Bram (1967) except for some terms
recently introduced by Knight (1970a, b), namely: ocular line to replace orbital
line, pedicel to replace torus, labial basal setae to replace basal bristles and
cibarial armature to replace buccopharyngeal armature. The pupal and larval
terminology follows Belkin (1962). All abbreviations of the names of institu-
ras ‘air the type specimens are deposited follow Stone, Knight and Starcke
1959).
In listing the specimens under "Distribution", only the names of countries,
provinces (if known) and localities and number of specimens examined are
given. The full data on these specimens are placed on file at the Southeast Asia
Mosquito Project and is available on demand to those interested.
TAXONOMIC HISTORY
The history of Eumelanomyia, currently accepted as a valid subgeneric
taxon with two synonyms, namely, Protomelanoconion and Mochthogenes
(Sirivanakarn 1971) is briefly summarized below.
Eumelanomyia was originally recognized as a distinct genus by Theobald
(1909, 1910) with Eumelanomyia inconspicuosa from the Ethiopian region as
the type species. This genus was described as being similar to Culiciomyia
but the true identity of the type species was not known until Edwards (19222)
re-examined the specimens and identified them as Culex. The name incon-
Spicuosa was thus found to be preoccupied, was rejected and the new name Culex
albiventris proposed by Edwards for this species. In 1910, Theobald recognized
Frotomelanoconion as a distinct genus based on a misidentified Culex species
which he named Frotomelanoconion fusca. Edwards (1922a) again found this
name to be preoccupied and therefore proposed the name Culex horridus to re-
place it. In addition to these corrections, an attempt was made by Edwards
(loc. cit.) to group a number of Culex species with the suggestion that both
Eumelanomyia and Frotomelanoconion be treated as separate subgenera of
Culex. However, since only a few forms representing these group taxa were
known, no further progress was made by Edwards in their taxonomy during
that period. Later in 1930, Edwards recognized Mochthogenes as a subgenus
of Culex to include only the old world species with male palpus as short as in
the female. The type species of Mochthogenes was Culex malayi which was
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 3
erroneously described as Aedes malayi by Leicester (1908). No significant _
contribution was made towards a better understanding of the taxonomy of these
3 nominal group taxa until 1932 when Edwards classified and characterized all
known Culex subgenera on a worldwide basis. In his treatment, Eumelanomyia,
Protomelanoconion and 20 other Culex species were grouped within the sub-
genus Neoculex Dyar 1905. The subgenus Mochthogenes was retained although
he apparently indicated that it comprised species which do not differ essentially
from Frotomelanoconion. The subgenus Neoculex. was subdivided into 3 groups:
A. Neoculex or apicalis group; B. Eumelanomyia or albiventris group and C.
Protomelanoconion or uniformis group. Later, in his revision of the Ethiopian
fauna, Edwards oe recognized 2 additional groups (bulchrithorax and rima)
and changed group B (Eumelanomyia) and group C (Protomelanoconion) to groups
Dand E. Edwards' scheme though not entirely satisfactory as pointed out by
Mattingly and Marks (1955) and Belkin (1962), lead to no significant changes
until 1971 when the question was critically examined by Sirivanakarn who finally
proposed a reclassification of all Neoculex and Mochthogenes species. In this
new scheme, 3 subgenera were recognized, namely, Neoculex, Maillotia and
Eumelanomyia ; and the other 2 nominal group taxa: Protomelanoconion and
Mochthogenes were synonymized with Eumelanomyia. For amore complete
treatment of the various group taxa according to the new scheme, see
Sirivanakarn (1971).
Genus CULEX LINNAEUS
Subgenus EUMELANOMYIA THEOBALD
Eumelanomyia Theobald 1909, Colon. Rep. Misc. Ser. No. 237: 10; 1910
: Mon. Cul. 5: 240. TYPE SPECIES: Culex albiventris Edwards 1922a
(nom. nov. for Eumelanomyia inconspicuosa Theobald 1909).
Protomelanoconion Theobald 1910, Mon. Cul. 5: 462. TYPE SPECIES:
Culex horridus Edwards 1922a (nom. nov. for Frotomelanoconion fusca
Theobald 1910).
Culex (Mochthogenes), Edwards 1930, Bull. ent. Res. 21: 305. TYPE SPE-
CIES: Culex malayi (Leicester) 1908. |
Culex (Neoculex) in part, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc.
194: 193-194; 1941, Mosq. Ethiopian Region 3: 249-269; Barraud 1934,
Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 347-352; Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer.
Ent. Inst. 7: 124-128; Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 23-32.
Culex (Mochthogenes), Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc. 194:
195; 1941, Mosq. Ethiopian Region 3: 277-279; Barraud 1934, Fauna
Brit. India, Diptera 5: 352-359; Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 128-135; Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 33-42.
FEMALE. Small to medium sized, dark and unornamented species. Head.
Decumbent scales on dorsum of vertex varied from narrow to broad; erect
scales numerous, usually entirely dark; palpus and proboscis dark scaled;
palpus 3 or 4-segmented, usually 0.2 of proboscis length, sometimes shorter,
segments 1 and 2 not clearly marked, segment 3 slightly longer than segments
1 and 2 combined, segment 4 longest, equal to or slightly longer than the com-
bined length of segments 1-3; labial basal setae 4 in number, length varied;
flagellomeres 1-13 of antenna subequal in length, each with a weak whorl of
5-6 hairs which are 1. 5-2 times as long as flagellomere following. Cibarial
armature. Usually very well developed, number, texture and arrangement of
teeth varied. Thorax. Integument of pronotum, scutum and scutellum dark
brown; scutal and scutellar scales narrow and predominantly dark; acrostichal
bristles usually present on anterior half of scutal disc, sometimes absent or
only a few present; pleuron paler or as dark as scutum, scales completely ab-
sent or only a few present on upper corner and posterior border of stp; 1 lower
mep bristle usually present, sometimes absent. Legs. Coxal integument paler
than or as dark as pleuron; fore and mid femora dark anteriorly and dorsally,
4 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
pale ventrally; anterior surface of hind femur usually with a white stripe ex-
tending from base to apex, rarely dark, dorsal surface dark, ventral surface
pale; all tibiae and tarsi dark; all tarsal claws small, equal and simple; pul-
villi poorly or well developed. Wing. Plume scales dark, usually narrow,
sometimes broad oval; halter knob dark scaled, peduncle pale, without scales.
Abdomen. Terga usually entirely dark scaled, sometimes with pale basal bands
or basolateral pale spots on terga II-VII; sterna paler scaled or sometimes as —
in terga. Pais
MALE. Generally similar to females except for sexual characters as in
the following. Head, Palpus varied from 0.2 to longer than the proboscis,
short palpus 3-4 segmented as in female, long palpus 5-segmented; proboscis
with or without false joint; pedicel of antenna unmodified; flagellomeres 1-11
subequal in length, usually with 2 series of whorls, 1 of which is large (normal
whorl), with 15-40 long hairs, the other small (minor whorl) with 4-15 short
and weak hairs, sometimes with large normal whorls only; flagellomeres 12
and 13 elongate, subequal, about two times as long as flagellomere 11. Legs,
Claws of fore and mid legs enlarged, unequal, external one larger than inter-
nal, each with a small basal denticle; claws of hind leg small, simple, as in
female. Terminalia. Tergal lobes of segment IX usually small, sometimes
large and prominent, setae varied in length and number; sternum IX broad, rec-
tangular; without any scales or setae; basimere usually slender; conical, el
sometimes large and strongly modified, strong submarginal setae present or
absent; subapical lobe usually small; proximal and distal divisions usually not
clearly divided; proximal division with 3 rod-like setae; distal division with or
without 1 strong basal seta and 1 leaflet laterally, and always with a variable
number of hair-like or blade-like setae-mesally; distimere usually slender,
sickle-shaped, sometimes strongly modified; claw well developed, length and
thickness varied, usually subapical, sometimes apical; ventral subapical seta
usually present;. dorsal one present or absent; phallosome oval or subspherical
in shape, rarely modified, (upper) tergal bridge median or submedian in posi-
tion, lateral plate narrow-broad oval or tappered towards apex, denticles
varied in number and size, more or less restricted to upper tergal surface,
sometimes also with a strong tooth-like internal process; ventral sternal lobe
usually small, indistinct, rarely large or prominent; proctiger crown small
to medium sized, number and texture of spicules varied, lateral paraproct
usually thin, basal sternal process absent, cercal setae 2-4 in number.
PUPA. Abdomen 1.7-3.0 mm, paddle 0. 4-0.52 mm, trumpet 0. 36-0. 52
mm, index 7-10. All ground pool forms generally pale or cream colored,
those from treeholes yellowish brown to dark brown; trumpet darker than
underlying integument, usually uniformly cylindrical, sometimes more or less
elliptical, pinna with or without slit extending to meatus. Cephalothorax and
Metanotum. Hair 8-C usually double, sometimes 3-4b; 9-C single or double;
10-C usually double, sometimes 4-5b; 11-C double, rarely single. Abdomen.
Hair 5-IV 2-4b; 5-V, VI usually double (1-3); 9-VIII weakly plumose and placed
near caudolateral angle. Paddle. Broad oval, usually very pale to almost
transparent, distal external margin smooth, without fringe of spicules, midrib
pale or lightly pigmented, apical hairs 1 present or absent; 2-P always pres-
ent.
LARVA. Head 0.6-0.75 mm, siphon 0. 9-3.0 mm, index 5-15, saddle
0.2-0.3 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 3-10. Pigmentation varied as in pupa. Head.
Broader than long; antenna as long as head, spicules strong and numerous, hair
1-A strongly plumose, 2 and 3-A dark, strong, single, usually placed subapi-
cally, sometimes apical; mouth brushes filamentous; head hair 1-C a dark,
stout spine; 5, 6-C varied in length, both hairs usually double, sometimes
single or 3-4b; mental plate dark, with 1 large median tooth and 6-7 smaller
lateral teeth on each side. Thorax. Unspiculated; hair 3-P short and weak,
about 0. 25 of hair 1 or 2-P. usually single; 4-P usually strongly reduced in
length, its length varying from shorter than 3-P to as long as 1 or 2-P, 1-4b;
7-P 1-2b; 8-P subequal to 7-P, always single; 14-P always double. Abdomen.
Without spicules; hairs 6-I, II double; 7-I usually single sometimes double;
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 5
6-IlI-V 2-4b, 6-VI 1-4b; comb scales numerous, usually undifferentiated in
size; hair 2-VIII single. Siphon. Slender, moderately long to very long; pec-
ten teeth 8-15 in number, graded size or strongly differentiated in length; si-
phonal tufts 4-6 pairs, placed ventrally or subventrally, their length varying
from 1-5 times as long as siphonal width at point of attachment; median caudal
filament of spiracular apparatus usually present in all ground pool forms, ab-
sent in treehole or bamboo forms. Anal segment. Hair 2-X 1-3b; ventral
brush usually with 6 pairs of hairs, sometimes 5, all inserted within grid;
anal gills as long as or longer than saddle.
DISTRIBUTION. Eumelanomyia is more or less restricted to the tropics
of the Ethiopian and Oriental regions with a small extension to the east as far
as the Papuan part of the Australasian region and the South Pacific. In South-
east Asia, it has been recorded mainly from Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam,
West Malaysia, the Ryukyu Islands and the Philippines. Very few species are
known from East Malaysia and most parts of Indonesia no doubt largely due to
the absence of collections from these areas.
SYSTEMATICS. Within Southeast Asia and adjacent areas, the adults and
the immature stages of Eumelanomyia are distinguished from other subgenera
of Culex by the combination of the following characters. The adult is generally
separated by the relatively small size; dark to nearly black in color; absence of
pale or-white bands on palpus, proboscis; and leg; predominantly dark, narrow
crescent-shaped scales on scutum and scutellum; absence of scales on the pleuron
and in the majority of species by the presence of acrostichal bristles and the
entirely dark abdominal terga. The male is distinguished from Lotphoceraomyia
by the absence of tufts of modified setae in the antennal flagellomeres; from
Culiciomyia by the absence of a row of lanceolate scales on the ventral surface
of palpal segment 3 and in the majority of species by the following additional fea-
tures: (1) presence of minor whorls of 4-15 short hairs distal to major long
plumose whorls in the antennal flagellomeres 1-11 and (2) palpus as short as in
the female. In the male terminalia, the subgenus is characterized by the oval |
or subspherical-shape of the phallosome; absence of a basal sternal process in
the lateral paraproct of the proctiger; small sized proctiger crown; absence of
dorsal subapical crest of spines on the dorsal subapical surface of distimere and
by the reduced or poorly developed tergal lobe of segment IX. The pupa is char-
acterized by its small size; moderately long and slender trumpet; hair 10-C of
metanotum usually with a small number of branches and hair 9-VIII of abdomen
placed near to the caudolateral angle. In the larva, the following characters
are diagnostic: (1) head hair 1-C dark, stout spine; (2) head hairs 5, 6-C usually
reduced in length and with only a few branches; (3) prothoracic hair 3-P short,
about 0.25 of hairs 1 or 2-P; 4-P usually as long as or shorter than 3-P, 1-4
branched, 7-P double, 8-P single, 14-P double; (4) abdominal hairs 6-I, II
double, 7-I single, 2-VIII single; (5), (6) siphon slender, from moderately long
to very long, presence of 4-6 pairs of subventral tufts and (8) ventral brush of
saddle with 5-6 pairs of hairs.
The distinguishing characters of the adults as summarized above are appli-
cable to all species currently placed within Eumelanomyia but those of the im-
mature stages are limited only to certain species groups in Southeast Asia and
adjacent areas. Except for the male characters, the adults of Eumelanomyia
are generally very similar to Lophoceraomyia and Culiciomyia. The female
of all Oriental forms except brevipalpis and phangngae are readily separated
from the members in the latter 2 subgenera by the presence of acrostichal
bristles on the scutal disc. The females of brevifalfis and phangngae which
lack this character resemble Lophoceraomyia and Culiciomyia rather closely
but can be separated from them by the fine, narrow decumbent scales on the
dorsum of vertex of the head and by the absence of a lower mesepimeral bristle.
The known immature stages of some Oriental species are distinct from
Culiciomyia and other Culex subgenera, but show a great deal of similarity to
those of Lophoceraomyia. No clear-cut difference in the chaetotaxy has been
found to distinguish Eumelanomyia pupae from those of Lophoceraomyia. The
larvae, although showing a great deal of overlap with Lophoceraomyia, can be
6 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
readily separated from it by the magnitude and branching of certain hairs of
the head, prothorax and abdomen and in the majority of species by the features
of the siphon as indicated in the above diagnosis and in the descriptions of the
subgenus. :
The subgenus Eumelanomyia, in the current interpretation of Sirivanakarn
(1971) on the basis of the male phallosome, comprises 4 major groups: eu-
melanomyia, rubinotus-vima, protomelanoconion and mochthogenes. In South- —
east Asia and adjacent areas, only 3 of the 4 groups, namely, vubinotus-rima,
protomelanoconion and mochthogenes are represented. The eumelanomyia
group is absent from Southeast Asia and other parts of the Oriental region and
is most probably exclusively Ethiopian. Of the 27 species presently recognized
from the areas under the present consideration, 2 belong to the vubinotus -rima
group, 2 to the protomelanoconion group and 23 to the mochthogenes group. |
They are segregated into groups as follows: (1) vubinotus-rima group with
simplicicornis and malayensis; (2) protomelanoconion group with brevipalpis
and phangngae and (3) mochthogenes group with uncinatus, foliatus, latifoliatus,
hinglungensis, castrensis, cataractarum, baisasi, malayi, laureli, yeageri,
pluvialis, campilunati, selai, khazani, tenuipalpis, vichei, hayashii, hackevi,
kiriensis, okinawae, iphis, bokorensis and otachati. In addition, 1 unnamed
form which at present is known only in the pupal and larval stages is also inclu-
ded in the mochthogenes group. Until adults, particularly the males, are ©
known this form is not formally described here but the pupa and larva are diag-
nosed in the keys and are briefly characterized under species 28.
The 3 groups of Eumelanomyia in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas are
basically similar in the male phallosome (particularly aedeagus) but their
detailed affinities can not be completely clarified, largely because the immature
stages are only partially known. As indicated in the keys to groups and inthe ~
discussion of the groups below, there is no overlap in the diagnostic adult fea-
tures of the 7ubinotus -rima with the other 2 groups. The protomelanoconion
and the mochthogenes groups are apparently closely related, showing several
overlaps in the male characters but are strongly differentiated from each other
in the immature stages. The mochthogenes group which is the largest in num-
ber of species is most complex and in the present study it is being subdivided
into 11 subgroups. This realignment is essentially similar to the previous
scheme developed by Sirivanakarn (1971) except for the detailed subdivision
into additional subgroups in order to indicate more accurately the affinities
of all taxa involved. For this subdivision and for the complete characteriza-
tion of the groups and subgroups, see the treatment below.
AFFINITIES. Eumelanamyia undoubtedly belongs to the same primitive
Culex stock as Neoculex and Maillotia on the basis of the comparatively simple
male phallosome. In spite of the clear cut divergence in the phallosome types,
other features of the male terminalia and the external adult morphology, as
pointed out by Sirivanakarn (1971), these 3 subgenera still show many features
in common and generally appear to form a well-defined group separated from
the rest of Culex. The detailed affinities of the 3 subgenera are not clear and
can not be resolved at present largely because of the lack of complete know- —
ledge of the immature stages. However, certain evidence from the male ter-
minalia and the adult morphology seems to warrant some speculation with re-
gard to their probable relationships. This evidence is the intermediate condition ex-
hibited by the species in the seyvigi group of Maillotia which resembles Eumel-
anomyia in the phallosome and other features of the male terminalia but are
similar to Neoculex in external characters. It seems most probable that
Eumelanomyia is an ancient derivative of the species in Maillotia from which
it is differentiated by the complete absence of pleural scaling, darker colora-
tion and by modifications in the male terminalia. This view is well supported
by the present distribution of the 2 subgenera which overlap in the Ethiopian
region. Among the 4 Eumelanomyia groups, the eumelanomyia and the
rubinotus -rima groups appear to be the most primitive as they show closer
similarity in male morphology to those of the Maillotia species. The pro-
tomelanoconion and the mochthogenes groups are probably of recent lineage
and were perhaps derived from the other 2 groups. The presence of all 4
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 7
_ Eumelanomyia groups and the predominence of the eumelanomyia and
rubinotus -rima groups in the Ethiopian region strongly suggest that the sub-
genus probably originated there. |
In the Oriental region, Eumelanomyia shows a strong affinity with Lopho-
ceraomyia. The latter is exclusively Oriental and Australasian with the range ~
extended to the South and Western Pacifics and appears to be largely overlapped
by Eumelanomyia only in the Oriental region. Among the 3 Eumelanomyia
groups (rubinotus-rima, protomelanoconion and mochthogenes), the species in
the vubinotus -rima group show a great deal of similarity in the male morphol- |
ogy to Lophoceraomyia and it is most probable that the latter subgenus is de-
rived from it as suggested in my earlier interpretation (Sirivanakarn 1971).
BIOLOGY. In Southeast Asia and adjacent areas, Eumelanomyia species
are common in tropical forests in the hills or mountains away from the coast-
line. The adults of the majority of species have been frequently collected while
resting on vegetations in the vicinity of streams or swampy ground. The breed-
ing habitat ranges from ground pools of different sizes (most of the mochtho-
genes group species) to treeholes or bamboos (all protomelanoconion group
species). These habitats are, in most instances, under heavy shade; the water
is fresh, containing little decayed organic matters. The ground pool forms
have been frequently found in association with other Culex and Anophleles
species, whereas those from treeholes or bamboos are often associated with
the specimens of Trijteroides, Aedes, and Culex (Lofhoceraomyia) species.
The feeding habit of the females is not known and none of the species reported
here has ever been incriminated in the transmission of pathogens. However,
elsewhere, particularly from certain parts of South Africa, Worth and
de Meillon (1960) reported the isolation of 3 different viruses from a species
(rubinotus) in the subgenus.
KEYS TO GROUPS IN THE ORIENTAL REGION“
FEMALES
1. Wing veins Ro, Rg, R, 45) M, 49 and M, +4 with broad oval shaped
WIT ARO Se Zo asl A aad he, Magee A mea ws RUBINOTUS-RIMA GROUP.
Wing veins Ro, Re, Ryi5> My,9 and Mg, with narrow, linear or
Ssiiall clavate prime scales. (greg het ee ere ae re ee es 2
2(1). Acrostichal bristles absent; lower mej bristle absent.
PROTOMELANOCONION GROUP
Acrostichal bristles present; lower mep bristles usually present.
MOCHTHOGENES GROUP
MALES
if Palpus longer than proboscis by at least the length of terminal segment;
antennal flagellomeres 1-11 without minor whorls of short and weak
TEE SA) ean eo aCe abe reste el Cra erst’ RUBINOTUS-RIMA GROUP
Palpus shorter, its length varying from 0.2 to 0. 75 of proboscis; an-
tennal flagellomeres 1-11 usually with minor whorls of short and
weals Waites. Serie! pie RO Ag Fae eR ala ere tie ae ole wee eee
2(1). Palpus 0. 75 of proboscis, segments 3-5 rather thick and irregular or
distorted in shape; middle part of proboscis swollen and with several
strong setae ventrally. ...... PROTOMELANOC ONION GROUP
Palpus usually 0.2 of proboscis, sometimes 0.75 as long; segments
e e e ° ° e
IThe eumelanomyia group (Sirivanakarn 1971) is not included since it is purely
Ethiopian in distribution.
8 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
3-5 uniformly very thin; proboscis slender and without above modifi-
BOR ay cies artes GEE ee RRR MOCHTHOGENES GROUP
PUPAE
(Unknown in RUBINOTUS-RIMA GROUP)
Trumpet rather short, stout and more or less elliptical in shape, pinna
without narrow slit extending to meatus; coloration of integument
yellowish to dark brown. ..... FROTOMELANOCONION GROUP
Trumpet relatively longer, slender and more or less cylindrical in
shape, pinna with narrow slit extending to meatus; coloration of
integument creamy white to almost transparent.
ae MOCHTHOGENES GROUP
LARVAE
(Unknown in RUBINOTUS-RIMA GROUP)
Antennal hairs.2, 3-A.placed apically; siphen very long and with -
weak and rather inconspicuous subventral tufts; distal pecten teeth
2-3 times as long as the basal ones.
PROTOMELA NOC ONION GROUP
Antennal hairs 2, 3-A placed subapically; siphon moderately long and
with 10-12 strong tufts on ventral surface; distal pecten teeth from
4-5 times as long as the basal ones. . . . VWOCHTHOGENES GROUP
RUBINOTUS-RIMA GROUP
FEMALE.. Small to medium sized species; in general as described for the
subgenus, with the following distinctive characters. Head. Decumbent scales
on dorsum of vertex narrow, linear and predominantly pale yellowish; broad
decumbent. scales restricted to lateral patch at side; erect scales dark brown;
palpus 0.2 of proboscis length; proboscis with 4 labial basal setae, 2 lateral
ones as long as palpus. Cibarial armature. Cibarial bar with 20-24 teeth,
middle 6-8 teeth narrow, pointed, and closely spaced, 6-8 lateral teeth shorter,
coarser, abruptly pointed or truncate and more widely spaced. Wing. Plume
scales on veins Ry, Ra, Ry, and branches of M broad, oval. Abdomen. Terga
II- VII with basola era pale Edots or with complete basal bands.
MALE. In general as in female except for the presence of complete basal
bands on abdominal terga II-VII and the following. Head. Palpus exceeding the
length of proboscis by at least the full length of segment 5; segments 4 and 9
upturned, with several dark bristles laterally and mesally; proboscis without
false joint; antennal flagellum densely long plumose, minor whorls absent,
normal whorls with 30-40 long hairs. Terminalia. Tergal lobes of segment
IX poorly or very well developed; basimere slender, more or less conical;
setae of subapical lobe varied, leaflet present or absent; distimere slender,
sickle-shaped; phallosome subspherical or varied in shape; proctiger crown
small, consisting of several fine and pointed spicules.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
DISCUSSION. The rvubinotus-rima group as established by Sirivanakarn
(1971) is represented by several species in the Ethiopian region but by only 2
in the Oriental, namely simplicicornis Edwards 1923 and malayensis n. sp.
They are distinct from all members of the }votomelanoconion and mochthogenes
groups in the broad plume scales of the wing veins, male palpus longer than
proboscis and in the absence of minor whorls of short hairs on flagellomeres
1-11 of the male antenna. Both species conform to the rubinotus subgroup
characters as defined by Sirivanakarn (loc. cit.) and are differentiated from
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 9
each other by the details of the male terminalia. The group appears to be re-
lated to the subgenus Lothoceraomyia on the basis of adult morphology. In
Southeast Asia and adjacent areas, the vubinotus-rima group has been recorded
only from Malaya and Borneo. The immatures and the breeding habitat are
~ still unknown. zi
KEYS TO SPECIES
FEMALES
Upper margin of posterior pronotum with 6-8 tiny setae anterior to
4-5 strong setae on posterior border. ...... malayensis Nn. Sp.
Upper margin of posterior pronotum without any setae anterior to
4-5 strong setae on posterior border....... i: simp licicornis
MALES
Tergal lobe of segment IX of male terminalia very small, 4-5 tiny
setae present; distal division of subapical lobe without leaflet; |
_ lateral plate of phallosome narrowed and tapered to.a-point distally. .
. malayensis n. sp.
Tergal lobe of segment IX of male terminalia large and prominent,
about 25 strong setae present; distal division of subapical lobe with
a broad leaflet laterally; lateral plate of phallosome broad and more
or less subspherical in shape. ............. simp licicornis
1. Culex (Eumelanomyia) simplicicornis Edwards ~
(Figs. 1A, o terminalia; 1B, ¢ cibarial armature)
Culex (Neoculex) simtlicicornis Edwards 1930, Bull. ent. Res. 21: 306 (<);
1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc. 194: 194 (taxonomy).
Culex (Eumelanomyia) simtlicicornis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer.
Ent. Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy). |
FEMALE. Wing 3.0 mm, fore femur 1.5 mm. Medium sized, brownish
species. Head, Decumbent scales on vertex narrow, linear and entirely pale
yellowish, occupying an extensive area anteriorly, centrally and posterolater-
ally; lateral patch of broad decumbent scales small; erect scales entirely
brown, more or less restricted to occiput; palpus 0.2 of proboscis length.
Cibarial armature (Fig. 1B). Cibarial bar with about 24 teeth, median 6 teeth
narrow, long and apically pointed, lateral 7-9 teeth coarser, shorter, apically
blunt or truncate. Thovax. Scutal integument brown, all scales narrow, mod-
erately dense and predominantly dark except for some yellowish ones on ex-
-treme.anterior promontory; acrostichal bristles present; jin without setae or
scales anterior to posterior bristles; pleuron same color as scutum, scales
absent; ppl with 1 or 2 dark strong setae and 4-5 yellowish hairlike setae; 1
strong, dark, lower mep bristle present. Legs. All femora, tibiae and tarsi
brown to black scaled. Wing. Scales broad oval, dark and rather dense on all
veins. Abdomen. Terga with basolateral pale spots on III-VII; sterna entirely
pale scaled.
MALE. In general similar to female, differing in the following. Head.
Palpus exceeding the length of proboscis by 1.5 of the length of segment 5;
segment 3 with a ventral row of tiny hairs in apical 0.5, its apex bears 2 or 3
bristles laterally; segments 4 and 5 upturned, moderately to strongly plumose;
proboscis slender, uniformly thick, labial false joint absent, labial basal setae
4-5 in number, all dark, long, hairlike as in female; antennal flagellar whorls
densely long,plumose, minor whorls of shorter hairs absent. Abdomen. Terga
II-VII with distinct basal pale bands. Terminalia (Fig. 1A). Tergal lobe of seg-
ment IX large, prominent, with about 25 strong bristle-like setae; basimere
10 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
slender, conical, inner tergal surface with 2 rows of 10-12 strong submargin-
al setae and several other weak ones; area laterad of subapical lobe practically
bare; subapical lobe broad, proximal division with 3 subequal rod-like setae,
all with weakly hooked apices, distal division more or less separated from
proximal, with 1 strong basal seta and 1 very broad acuminate or blunt tipped
leaflet laterally and 2 short blade-like setae, 1 long, narrow blunt tipped leaf-
let mesally; distimere sickle-shaped, uniformly thick from base to 0. 79 of
the length, distal 0.25 tapered into a small, slightly recurved apex; ventral
subapical seta present near middle, dorsal one present, subapical claw
slender and moderately long; phallosome subspherical in tergal view, lateral
plate broad oval, with a slender internal blade-like process, its tergal surface
with 15-20 strong denticles; proctiger crown small, with 15-20 dark pointed
spines, lateral paraproct thin; 1 cercal seta present.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male, marked as type by Edwards, with attached
terminalia mount, Samawang Jungle, near Sandakan, Sabah, East Malaysia,
MALAYSIA, 11 July 1927, H. M. Pendlebury (BM). PRESENT SELECTION.
ee aa ‘Known only from East Malaysia. Material examined:
50° and 29,
MALAYSIA. East Malaysia: Sabah, near Sandakan, Samawang Jungle,
4a, 19; Tawau, 1c; Sinapokan, 19.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The description of simplicicornis by Edwards
(1930) was based on males only and no illustration was provided. I have, how-
ever, checked the males in the type series and found them agreeing very well
with his description of this species. The description of the female given above
is based on 2 specimens, one of which bears similar field notes as the males
in the type series and the other is from Sinapokan (presumably also in Sabah).
Except for the absence of complete basal bands on the abdominal terga, these
females are generally very similar to the males and their association with this
species is probably correct.
C. simplicicornis is readily distinguished from the members in the pro-
tomelanoconion and mochthogenes groups in the female by the cibarial arma-
ture and in the male by the length of palpus, absence of the minor whorl in the
antenna and by details of.the terminalia as described above. It can also be
readily separated in general by the broad scales on the wing veins as indicated
in the key to groups. As pointed out by Edwards (1930: 306), simplicicornis
is quite similar to the species in the subgenus Lo¢hoceraomyia from which it
differs, however, in the absence of modified scales or setae in the male anten-
nal flagellum. The male terminalia of simplicicornis is also distinct from the
latter subgenus and apparently shows general resemblance to the members of
the protomelanoconion group and of the tenuipalpis subgroups of the mochtho-
genes Be OUR: 7 :
BIOLOGY. The adults of simplicicornis were collected under forest canopy.
The breeding habitat is not known. |
2. Culex (Eumelanomyia) malayensis n. sp.
(Figs. 1C, ¢ terminalia; 1D, ¢ cibarial armature)
FEMALE. Wing 2.7 mm, fore femur 1.4 mm, proboscis 1.9mm. Small
to medium sized, brown to dark brown species with external general characters
as described for simplicicornis, differing particularly in the following. Cibarial
armature, (Fig. 1D). Cibarial bar with larger lateral teeth, 6-8 median teeth
narrower, longer and more closely spaced. Thorax. Upper part of posterior
pronotum with 1 or 2 irregular rows of 6-8 short setae cephalad of posterior
bristles. Abdomen. Tera II-VII with median basal pale spots and basolateral
pale spots which sometimes form complete basal bands.
MALE. As in female, very similar to simplicicornis, differing chiefly in
the following. Head. Palpus shorter, its length exceeding proboscis by full
length of segment 5; flagellar whorls of antenna more strongly plumose. Abdo-
men. Tergum II with basal median pale spot, terga III-VII with broader basal
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 11
pale bands; sterna III- VII with pale basal bands as interga. Terminalia.
(Fig. 1C). Tergal lobe of segment IX very small, with 4-5 setae (only alveoli
seen); basimere broad, conical, inner tergal surface without specialized sub-
marginal setae; subapical lobe small, not clearly divided into proximal and
distal divisions; 3 proximal rods slender and thin, followed distally by 1 or 2
fine hair-like setae and 3-4 very narrow blade-like setae, leaflets absent;
distimere stout, slightly curved at middle; subapical claw rather long and
hooked apically; phallosome (lateral view only) strongly sclerotized, lateral
plate broad basally, reduced to a short pointed process apically; proctiger
crown small, consisting of a small number of fine and pointed spicules, lateral
paraproct with a rounded apical lobe; 2 cercal setae present.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male with terminalia on slide, Rantau, Panjang,
Kelantan, WEST MALAYSIA, 18 December 1956; allotype female with slide
of cibarial armature (70/698); paratype: 1 female, same data as holotype;
sant Pacific Tin, Selangor, WEST MALAYSIA, August-October 1965
USNM). :
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality and Pacific Tin,
Selangor, WEST MALAYSIA. Material examined: 1c, 5%, as indicated in
the type data. ‘2
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. malayensis n. sp. exhibits a great deal of
similarity to stmplicicornis in the general adult characters but is readily dis-
tinguished from it by several details of the male terminalia. The only exter-
nal adult character which I also found reliable for separating this species from
simplicicornis is the presence of a number of short setae on the upper margin
of the posterior pronotum. The above description of the male terminalia of
malayensis is based only on a single prepared slide and because of the dissec-
tion and orientation of parts, it is not possible to describe the phallosome
shape from the tergal view. The lateral plate of the phallosome, which is
described and figured here, is made from the lateral view only. As indicated
in the key and in the above description, this species is quite distinct from
simplicicornis in the details of the basimere, distimere, tergal lobe of seg-
ment IX and in the type of phallosome. The female also shows variation in
the extent of basal pale bands on the abdominal terga much as in simplicicornis.
BIOLOGY. C. malayensis is apparently rare. The adults were collected
(presumably by net) from only two localities in West Malaysia. The breeding
habitat is not known.
FROTOMELA NOCONION GROUP
FEMALE. Small to medium sized species. Head, Center of vertex with
narrow yellowish decumbent scales; erect scales numerous, usually pale an-
teriorly, dark posterolaterally; lateral labial basal setae of proboscis as long
as palpus. Cibarial armature. Poorly developed; cibarial bar with 20-22
minute teeth in the middle, 2-4 median teeth long, lateral ones reduced in
length. Thorax. Anterior half of scutal disc without acrostichal bristles; .
dorsocentral bristles very strong and dark; pleuron much paler than scutal
integument; lower meg bristle absent. Wing. Plume scales on branches
of veins R and M narrow, linear and moderately dense. Abdomen. Terga en-
tirely dark; sterna paler scaled.
MALE. Similar to female in general appearance. Head, Palpus about
0. 75 of the length of proboscis, segments 3, 4 and 5 strongly distorted in
shape; proboscis rather thick, middle part swollen and with several strong
setae on ventral surface; antennal flagellomeres 1-11 with minor whorls of 10-15
short hairs in addition to a large normal whorl of 35-40 hairs. Terminalia.
Tergal lobe of segment IX small with 6-9 moderately long setae; basimere
with 1 or 2 submarginal setae on its inner tergal surface; subapical lobe short
or elongate; proximal division with 3 stout rods, leaflet of distal division large
or small; distimere slender, sickle shaped and long; phallosome typically oval
or slightly modified; number of denticles varied; proctiger crown small, with
12 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
coarse and blunt spines laterally and fine pointed spines internally.
PUPA. Cephalothorax and abdomen yellowish to dark brown; trumpet
darker; paddle very pale to almost transparent. Trumpet short and stout,
somewhat elliptical, apex truncate; pinna with slit not extended to meatus.
Cethalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C double; 9-C usually single, rarely
double; 10-C usually 6-7b. Abdomen. Hairs 5-IV-VI usually 3, 2 or 3 and 3b
respectively; 6-III, IV usually double; 6-V, VI usually single.
LARVA. Head capsule, siphon and saddle light brown to dark brown. The
following features are diagnostic. Head, Antennal hairs 2, 3-A placed at apex
as hairs 4-6-A; 1-C a dark stout and pointed spine; 5, 6-C equally strong and
subequal in length, each 2 or 3b. Thorax. Hair 4-P a little longer than 3-P,
usually 3 or 4b; 7-P double; 8-P single; 14-P double. Abdomen. Hairs 6-I,
II and 7-I varied in color and thickness, all double; 6-IfI-V double; 6-VI single
and twice as long as 6-III-V; comb scales numerous, all with apical fringe of
fine spines; hair 2-VIII single. Sijhon. Very long and uniformly cylindrical;
pecten teeth small, distal teeth a little longer than the basal ones; 4 pairs of
subventral tufts present but minute and widely spaced; median caudal filament
of spiracular apparatus absent. Anal segment. Hair 2-X of saddle single;
ventral brush with 5 pairs (total 10) of hairs, all inserted within the grid.
DISCUSSION. The jvotomelanoconion group is represented in Southeast Asia
and adjacent areas by 2 very closely related species: brevipalfis (Giles) and
_phangngae n. sp. Both are undoubtedly related to horridus Edwards from the
Ethiopian region and to stellatus Someren from the Seychelles. They showa
strong affinity with the members of the mochthogenes group on the basis of
‘male antenna and terminalia but are distinct from the latter in the absence of
acrostichal bristles on scutal disc and in several features of the pupa and
larva. The 2 Southeast Asian species are extremely similar in the external
characters of adults and pupa, but can be differentiated from one another with
certainty by the detail of the male terminalia and by a few larval hairs as in-
dicated in the keys below. C. brevipalpis is most common and very widely
spread in the Oriental region with the range extending to the Papuan part of the
Australasian region. C. jhangngae is now known only from Thailand and it is
probable that it may also occur in other parts of the Indomalayan areas. The
most frequent breeding sites of these species are either treeholes or bamboos.
KEYS TO SPECIES
MALES
Lateral plate of phallosome typically oval-shaped, denticles rather
fine, about 20 in number; subapical lobe not elongated; basimere
about 0. 22 mm in length (fig. 2A). ..... RE GORE Bs ie Sig te brevipalpis
Lateral plate of phallosome with pronounced angle on upper lateral
margin; denticles coarser, more’‘numerous, about 30 or more in
number; subapical lobe elongated; basimere longer, about 0. 25-0. 29
Wwinin leneth (hie? 2D). ee Oa ee a phangngae n. sp.
LARVAE
Abdominal hairs 6-I, II and 7-I pale yellowish and tapered to a fine
point apleally. os See a BS Rope Sembee der eee en eg ... .brevipalpis
Abdominal hairs 6-I, Il and 7-I very dark brownish and abruptly
tapered to a point apically........ bedi et phangngae ni. sp.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 13
3. Culex (Eumelanomyia) brevipalpis (Giles)
(Figs. 2A, o terminalia; 2B, ° antennal flagellum;
yA ae cibarial armature; 3A, pupa; 3B, larva)
Stegomyia brevipalpis Giles 1902, Handb. 2nd ed.: 384 (S*, ¢*).
Culex longites Theobald 1901, Mon. Cul 2: 68 (3). Preoccupied by Culex
longites Fabricius (1850: 34).
Culex brevitalpis Theobald 1903, Mon. Cul 3: 146 (¢, 2); Barraud 1924a,
Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1277 (a*, 2); 1924b, Indian J. med. Res.
12: 432 (L*); Borel 1926, Arch. Inst. Pasteur Indo-Chine 3-4:40
(or, Se if Borel 1930, "Mon. Coll. Soc. Path. exot. 3: 365 (ee 1),
Culex macropus Blanchard 1905, Les Moustiques :327. New name for Culex
longipes Theobald 1901; synonymy with Culex brevitalpis by Barraud
1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1277.
Melanoconion uniformis Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya, 3: 136 (¢, 2). Con-
sidered as Cyathomyia brevitalpis by Edwards 1913, Bull. ent. Res.
4: 237; synonymy with Culex brevitalpis by Barraud 1924a, Indian J.
med. Res. 11: 1
Culex fidelis Dyar 1920, Insec. Inscit. menst. 8: 180 (3), Synonymy with
Culex brevipalpis by Edwards 1929, Notul. ent. 9: 4.
Culex (Neoculex) brevitalpis, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc.
194: 194 (taxonomy); Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 348-
351 (¢o*, 2, L*); Baisas 1935, Philipp. J. Sci. 57: 177 (o*, 2 ); Lee 1944,
Atlas mosq. larvae, Australasian Region, 1277 (L*); Bohart 1945, U. S.
Navmed 580: 72(¢*, L); Bohart and Ingram 1946, U. S. Navmed 1055: 72
(o*, 2, L*); Bonne-Wepster 1954, Roy. trop. Inst. Amst. Spec. Pub.
i11: 109 (o%, @, L*); Lien 1962, Pacif. Ins. 4: 631 (distribution);
Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 7: 125 (o*, 9, P*, L*); Bram
1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 25 (¢*, 2*, P*, ‘sy |
Culex (Eumelanomyia) brevipalpis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.6-3.6 mm, fore femur 1.7-1.9 mm, proboscis 1. 7-
2.1mm, abdomen 2.0-2.3 mm. "As figured by Bram (1967: 26); in general
extremely dark to black species; reared specimens with a considerable amount
of greenish tint on pleuron and coxae. Head. Decumbent scales of vertex
narrow, yellowish white anteriorly, forming a distinct ocular line; scales at
side of eye broad, aggregating into a distinct white or bluish white patch;
erect scales numerous, color variable from light brown to dark or sometimes
pale anteriorly, dark posterolaterally; interocular setae strong and dark; dor-
sal ocular setae moderately strong; palpus 4-segmented, about 0.2 of the
length of proboscis, segments 2, 3 bears a strong seta each; proboscis with 4
labial basal setae, 2 lateral ones strong, bristle-like and as long as palpus;
antenna slightly longer or equal to proboscis; pedicel very pale, with some
minute hairs or scales on its inner dorsal surface; flagellar whorl with 5 or 6
weak hairs. Cibarial armature (Fig. 2C). As figured, with about 20-22 poorly
developed teeth in the: middle of bar, median teeth longest, lateral ones gradu-
ally shorter, both ends of lateral flanges without teeth. Thorax. Scales on scutum
and scutellum narrow, predominantly dark except for a few pale ones on anteri-
or promontory, lateral margin of fossa and antealar areas; acrostichal bristles
absent except on extreme anterior promontory; dorsocentral bristles very
strong and dark; aj with 1-3 dark and strong bristles anteriorly and some
yellow hairs and narrow scales posteriorly; jn with some scattered pale
narrow scales; pleuron very pale, contrasting sharply with dark scutum; ppl
with 1 strong bristle and a few other weak and yellow hairs; upper corner and
posterior border of stp with a few pale translucent scales and a few short weak
hairs; lower posterior border of stp with a strong and dark bristle and a few
short, weak hairs; anterior lower mepf bristle absent; posterior upper mep
with a small patch of 4-5 weak, yellowish bristles. Legs. Coxae and tro-
chanters pale, concolorous with pleuron; fore coxa with anterior patch of white
14 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
scales and several weak setae; mid coxa with a lateral white patch of scales
and a row of 3 strong and dark bristles; hind coxa with anterior scale patch
and a posterior row of 6-10 bristles; fore and mid femora dark anteriorly and
laterally, white ventrally; anterior surface of hind femur pale in basal half,
dark distally and laterally; tibiae and tarsi completely dark scaled. Wing. All
scales black and narrow. Abdomen. Terga usually entirely dark scaled but
VI, VII sometimes with basolateral pale spots; sterna yellowish white scaled.
MALE. Similar to female in general features, differing in sexual characters
as in the following. Head, As figured by Bram (1967: 26); palpus 0. 75 of the
length of proboscis, 5-segmented; segments 2 and 3 equal in length, distal half
of segment 3 thickened and slightly bent, with a group of several short and
strong spines on ventral and mesal surfaces, its apex with a tuft of about 10
strong and curved spines mesally; segment 4 stout, thickened in basal half,
narrow in distal half, with several spines and setae ventrally and mesally, its
apical 0.2 with a row of 4-5 strong spines; segment 5 very short, slightly up-
turned, distorted in shape, with several setae and bristles on its apex; pro-
boscis thick, middle part swollen and bearing several strong hairs on ventral
surface; labial basal setae weak, 4 in number; flagellar whorls of antenna
strongly plumose, normal whorl with 35-40 hairs, minor whorl with 10-15
short and weak hairs (Fig. 2B). Terminalia (Fig. 2A). Segment IX with small
tergal lobes bearing 6-9 setae; basimere slender, conical, about 0.22 mm in
length; inner tergal surface concave, marginal setae sparse, 1 or 2 moderately
strong submarginal setae present; subapical lobe not divided into proximal and
distal divisions; proximally with 3 rod-like setae, most distal rods thinner than
other two rods, all with hooked apices; distally with 1 strong external seta, 1
narrow, indistinct leaflet, 1 short, hair-like and 2-3 narrow blade-like setae;
distimere long and slender, distally tapered to a blunt point, terminal claw
slender, placed near to apex; ventral subapical seta present, dorsal one pre-
sent or absent; phallosome with 2 oval-shaped lateral plates connected at
middle by a broad tergal bridge, upper tergal surface with about 20 denticles,
lower area bare, lateral margin smooth; proctiger crown small or medium
sized, with coarse spicules laterally and fine pointed spicules internally; cer-
cal setae minute, usually 3 in number.
PUPA (Fig. 3A). Abdomen 2.0-3.0 mm, paddle 0. 46-0. 52 mm, trumpet
0. 36-0. 52 mm, index about 7. As figured; general coloration yellowish brown
to dark brown; trumpet dark brown, stout and relatively short, more or less
elliptical in shape; the following chaetotaxy is diagnostic. Cephalothorax and
Metanotum. Hair 1-C usually 4b(3-6); 3-C double; 6-C 4 or 5b; 8-C double;
9-C usually single (1-2); 10-C usually 6-7b(4-8); 11-C always single, lightly
pectinate; 12-C usually triple (2-4). Abdomen. Hairs 3-I-III single; 1-III-VII
usually 14(10-18), 7(6-10), 5(4-7), 4-5(3-7) and 3(2-4)b respectively; 5-IV-VI
usually 3(2-5), 3(2-3) and 3(2-3)b respectively; 6-III, IV usually double (1-3);
6-V, VI usually single (1-2); 2-VII always lateral to 1-VII; 9-VII usually
6b(4-7); 9-VIII 8 or 9b, placed very close to caudolateral angle. Paddle. Very
pale and rather transparent, contrasting sharply with abdomen or cephalo-
thorax, midrib moderately strong and lightly pigmented, external buttress
distinct, distal margin indistinct; hair 1-P absent; 2-P present; genital lobe
of male pupa about 0.5 of paddle length. |
LARVA (Fig. 3B). Head 0.65-0.75 mm, siphon 1.5-3.0 mm. index 12-15,
saddle 0. 23-0.3 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 7-10. Coloration of head capsule,
‘siphon and saddle yellowish brown to dark brown, sometimes paler; thorax and
abdomen in live specimens dark bluish or greenish. Head, Antennal shaft
entirely cream colored or dark brown; spicules moderately dense and fine;
hair 1-A strongly plumose, inserted at about 0.75 of the length from base;
hairs 2, 3-A placed apically as 4-6-A; labrum narrow, head hair 1-C dark,
stout spine-like; 4-C single and long, about 2-3 times as long as distance be-
tween bases; 5-C usually 3b(2-4); 6-C usually 2b(2-3); 12-C rather weak and
short, about the same magnitude as 14-or 15-C, usually 5b(4-6); mental plate
with a large median tooth and 7-9 smaller lateral teeth on each side; hairs 16,
17-C absent. Thorax, Hair 3-P weak and short, about 0. 25 of the length of 1
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 15
or 2-P, always single; 4-P nearly as long as 1 or 2-P, usually triple (2-4);
7-P usually double (2-3); 8-P single or double; 14-P double. Abdomen. Hairs —
6, 7-I and 6-II double, all pale yellowish, with apices terminated into fine
points; 6-III-V double; 6-VI twice as long as 6-TI-V, always single; 1-I-VI
usually 5(4-5), 5, 5-6 and 4(3-4)b respectively; all other hairs rather weak
and short; comb scales about 40 in number, all with an even fringe of fine
spines apically; scales in posterior row slightly longer than those in anterior
row, middle scales intermediate in length; hair 2-VIII single. Szphon. Very
slender and usually very long, more or less uniformly cylindrical; pecten
teeth 12-15 in number, distal teeth with 8-10 fine denticles; siphonal hair
tufts usually 5 pairs (4-5) in number, inserted subventrally, all very weak,
short, widely spaced and rather inconspicuous, 3-4b each; hair 2-S very weak
and short; median caudal filament absent. Anal segment. Hair 2-X single;
ventral brush dark, with 5 pairs of hairs, all inserted within grid; anal gills
tubular, apices blunt, slightly longer than saddle.
TYPE DATA. (1) Culex longites Theobald 1901, holotype: female,
SINGAPORE (BM). (2) Stegomyia brevipalpis Giles 1902, Lectotype: male
with attached terminalia mount, Shajahnapur, United Provinces, INDIA (BM);
SELECTION OF BRAM (1967: 29). (3) Melanoconion uniformis Leicester
1908, lectotype: male with attached terminalia mount, Kuala Lumpur, West
Malaysia, MALAYSIA (BM); SELECTION OF BRAM (1967: 29). (4) Culex
fidelis Dyar 1920, lectotype: male, Los Banos, PHILIPPINES (USNM);
SELECTION OF STONE AND BOHART (1944: 220)
- DISTRIBUTION. Material examined: 449°, 4859,47 P, 90 L; 380 with
associated skins (125 p, 255 Ip).
INDIA. Assam: Chabua; Dibrugarh; Rupsi; 4,39. Bengal: Calcutta-
Botanical Garden; Bihar-Purnea; 19, 4 L.
BURMA. Rangoon; 3°,32; 6 lp.
CHINA. Canton; 1c, Hainan Island; 20,79.
TAIWAN. Pingtung: Santi-Santi; 19.
RYUKYU ISLANDS. Okinawa: Nakasoni; Shona Won; 1¢,49, 5 L.
THAILAND. Mae Hong Son: Ban Mae Ho Nua; Ban Pha Chi; Doi Chang;
225,229, Chiang Mai: Muang; Huey Chang Kien; Doi Sutep; Ban Tha Lan;
Ban Mae Kung; Dui Jom Jang; Huey Hin; Doi Huey Mae; Huey Kaeow; Ban Hua
Muang; Saraphi; San Kam Paeng; Mae Pim; 62,709, 20 p, 87 1p. Lampang:
Ngao, 10,19. Lampthun: Lee, 3°. Nan: Doi Chick Chang; Ban Wang Mo;
Ban Pha Man; Tak Huey Rong; Ban Ta Lai; Ban Pha Se be 129, 9-2; tL,
2p, 5lp. Tak: Khao Salak Phra; 4¢,19; lp, 41p. Phvrae: Saeng, Canton
Ban Khlong; 10,19. Udon Thani: Muang Ban Kau Noi; Ban Nong Bua; Ban
Pha Jut Wat Po; Ban Dong Nadee; 8,102. Sakon Nakhon: Muang nr.
hospital, 1o¢. Khon Kaen: Phu Wiang; Ban Muang Khao; 18¢,189, 1P, 1L.
Ubon Ratchathani: Pibul Mung Sahan chong Mek; 1¢,19. Nakhon Sawan: Ban
Talad Tai; Khas Phnom Set; Ban Pak Nam; 19¢,169, 11 p, 33 Ip. Nakhon
Ratchasima: Pak Chong; Pha Khlong Mai; Wang Ta Khlong; Khao Suan Hom; Ban
Kae Chae; Khai Pai; 140,129, 6p, 9 lp. Nakhon Nayok: Muang, Krong Kaeow
Water Fall; Pha Kluey Mai; Saliga; Nang Rong Water Fall; Ka Ang Water Fall;
Khao Eto; 100,119, 2 P, 2L, 8p, 7lp. Kanchanaburi: Muang; Baw Ploy,
Khien Sien Village; Huey Lin Tin; Juey Mae Nam Noi; Ban Sai Yok; Huey Bong
Ti; Khao Saeng; Khao Nga Chang; 20c, 359, 9 P, 7L, Tp, 23 1p. Nonthaburi:
Muang-Mu 2, 12;11lp. Ayuthaya: Bang Pa In, 12,249, 2p, 31. Thon Buri:
Bane’ Plad,; 10,29, 1 P, 1 L, ll. Chon Buri: Bang La Mung-Khao Mai Kaeow;
Koh Sri Chung; Huey Kum; 10<, 232, 5P, 2L, 7p, 91lp. Chanthaburi: Ban Tha
Mai; Ban Laem Sing; Khao Phra Bath; Khao Hin Paeng; 4,39, 4p, 1llp. Trad:
Laem Ngob, Ban Dan Mai; Hard Sai Daeng; 3¢°,59, 1P, 1L, llp. Fvachaut
Khiri Khan: Muang Khlong Van Hill; Tub Sakae, Huey Yang Water Fall; 10c,
39, Lp. Ranong: Muang, Wat Waree Ban Pot; Kraburi, Pet Kasem Road; Koh
Chang; Ban Chatri; Khlong Bang Man; 11¢,16? 9p, 5lp. Surat Thani: Koh
Samui, Khao Yai; Ko Mae Ko; Ban Li Pha Noi; 12c,229, 5 P, 1L, 19 p, 12 lp.
Fhangnga: Thap Wen, 7c, 22, 6p, 2 lp. Nakhon Si Thamarat: Chaung Khao;
Ban Thuen Lek; 3c, lp, 2 lp. Trang: Muang, National Park; Kan Tang; 6¢,
16... Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
92, 3p, 5lp. Fhattalung: 7c, 69, 4p, 8lp. Narathiwat: Wang, 2c.
CAMBODIA. Phnom Penh: 7¢,19. Ari Ksatr, 2,19. |
S. VIETNAM. Saigon; Bien Hoa; Con Son; Quang Duc, Bu Prang; Phuoc
Tuy, Vung Tau Village; Gia Dinh; Tay Ninh; An Khe; Cam Ranh; 12¢,119,
22 L, 4p, 10 lp. |
MALAYSIA. West Malaysia; Selangor- Ulu Gombak; Ulu Langat; Kepong;
The Gap; Kg. Juar P. Tioman; Ampang Forest Reserve, 16 mi from Bentong;
Gunong Benom Bale Camp; Ulu Klang; 360, 289, 7p, 17 lp. Pahang- Padang
Tengku Lipis; Mela K. Lipis; 8¢°,692, lp, 3lp. Kelantan - Gua Musang;
Bertam; 5c, 29..
INDONESIA. Borneo:(Kalimantan): Samarinda, 1¢. Java: Chilachap;
Djakarta; Bogor Kebun Raja; 11°,62, 9 P, 3 L, 4lp. Alor: Kalabahi, 1c,
Morotai; Raoe Island, 20°. West Irian: Cyclops mountains, 2.
PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Agoo La Union; Baguio; Subic Bay; Balaoan La
Union; Los Banos; Camansi La Union; Laguna, Mt. Makiling; 31¢, 209, 7 L,
4 lp. Mindoro: San Jose, 10c¢, 229, 19 L. Falawan: Puerto Princesca;
Irahnan River; Rosa Island; 2%. Mindanao: Pasanco Zamboanga; Parang;
Kabakan; 280,439, 3l1p. ~
Additional records from the literature: CEYLON (Barraud 1934); INDO-
NESIA, (Bonne-Wepster 1954); BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO (Lee 1944)
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. brevipaltis is one of the most dominant and
widely spread species of the subgenus in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas.
It is readily separated from the other forms of Eumelanomyia except thangngae
by the structure of the male palpus and proboscis and by several features of the
pupa and larva. Because of the absence of acrostichal bristles on the scutal
disc, the females of brevijalpis are easily confused with Lophoceraomyia and
Culiciomyia from which they are, however, distinguished by the narrow decum-
bent scales on the vertex and by the absence of the lower mesepimeral bristle.
The female cibarial armature as described and figured here is also quite dis-
tinct in the presence of relatively few and poorly developed teeth. The imma-
ture stages differ from other forms of Eumelanomyia as indicated in the keys
to groups, but show a great deal of similarity to Lophoceraomyia from which
they are separated as follows: In the pupa, it is distinguished by (1) shape and
reduced length of the trumpet; (2) multibranching of hair 10-C; (3) the triple
branching of hairs 5-IV-VI and (4) the absence of paddle hair 1-P. The larva
differs in (1) the triple branching of prothoracic hair 4-P; (2) the double branch-
ing of hairs 6-I, II; (3) having abdominal hair 6-VI unbranched and (4) the uni-
formly cylindrical shape of the siphon. | |
There are apparently no significant variations in the diagnostic characters
of brevipalpis from several parts of Southeast Asia and all of the specimens which
have been studied so far essentially conform toa single type. The adult char-
acters which are subjected to a great deal of individual variation are the general
size and the presence or absence of basolateral pale spots on the abdominal
terga. The larva shows a great deal of variation in the length of the siphon, but
is quite constant in several features of the chaetotaxy as noted above.
BIOLOGY. The most frequent breeding sites of brevipalLis are treeholes
and bamboos in which the immature stages have usually been collected in great
numbers. On certain occasions, they have also been collected from other con-
tainers such as coconut shells, water jugs, discarded barrels and stone basins.
The few collections from ground pools as noted by Bram (1967) are probably
incorrect. The larval and adult collections were made from a broad range of
elevation in the virgin tropical forest, bamboo bushes or plantation areas. Al-
though in certain instances, brevitalpis has been found to occur near human
dwellings, the adults thus far have never been collected biting man or other
domestic animals. Bonne-Wepster (1954) noted that the female may attack
man near the breeding places but this has not been supported by the extensive
field data either in the previous literature or in the present reports.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 17
4, Culex (Eumelanomyia) phangngae n. sp.
(Fig. 2D, o& terminalia)
FEMALE. Wing 2.5-3.0 mm, fore femur 1. 5-1.7mm, proboscis 1. 5-1. 8
mm, abdomen 1.7 mm. Essentially as described for brevifalpis from which
_ it is indistinguishable. Abdominal terga entirely dark, pale basolateral spots
completely absent. Cibarial armature. As described and figured for brevital-
pis. |
MALE. Similar to female, differing from brevipalpis particularly in the
following characters. Head. Flagellar whorls of antenna rather weakly plu-
mose. Terminalia (Fig. 2D). As figured; generally similar to brevipalpis,
but differing in having a larger basimere, of which the length ranges from 0. 25-
0.29 mm. ; subapical lobe rather prominent, somewhat elongate, proximal
division with the most proximal rod strongly bent in the middle, the other two
rods gently curved, distal division with a broader acuminate leaflet and a strong-
er basal seta laterally, 1 strong, short, hairlike and 2 minute setae mesally;
lateral plate of phallosome most distinctive, with a pronounced angle on upper
lateral margin, dorsal half tapered to a blunt apex, denticles coarser and more
numerous, about 30 or more present; proctiger crown with stronger spicules.
PUPA. Essentially as described and figured for brevipalpis, differing only
in having a broader and longer male genital lobe which is nearly two-thirds of
paddle length.
LARVA. Very similar to brevipalpis in general and in almost all details of
chaetotaxy, differing particularly in having abdominal hairs 6 and 7 of segment
I and hair 6 of segment II very dark and stout with apices abruptly ended in a
point. — z :
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (01745-1) with associated pupal and larval
skins and terminalia slide, Nam Tai, Phangnga, THAILAND, split bamboo ly-
ing on the ground, elevation 200 meters, October 18, 1966, E. L. Peyton.
Allotype: female (01745-4) with associated pupal and larval skins. Paratypes:
1 male (01745-2) with associated pupal and larval skins and terminalia slide;
2 females (01745-3, 5) with associated pupal and larval skins; 1 male (01746-109)
with associated pupal skin and terminalia slide; 1 male (01828-100) with associ-
ated pupal skin and terminalia slide; 1 male (01830) with terminalia slide,
October 22, 1966, C. Dhirapat, same locality as holotype (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the South of Thailand. Material exam-
ined: 120, 219, 23 L; 24 with associated skins (11 p, 13 Ip).
THAILAND. Phangnga: Nam Tai; Thap Wen; 12c, 219, 22 L; 9p, 8 lp.
Nakhon Si Thammarat: Ban Sai Kae, 1 L.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. thangngae is extremely similar to brevipal-
pis in all stages but is separable from the latter in the male terminalia by the
features of the phallosome and other details of the basimere and distimere as
indicated in the key and as described above. The larva is also distinct from
brevipalpis in having abdominal hairs 6-I, Il and 7-I darker and stronger. The
two forms overlap in distribution in the locality where phangngae was found
without an apparent intergradation in the diagnostic male characters indicating
that they are undoubtedly distinct.
BIOLOGY. As in brevipalpis, the most frequent breeding sites of phangngae
are in bamboos but rarely in treeholes. All of the adults were obtained from
either individual or mass rearing. Nothing more is known about its biology.
MOCHTHOGENES GROUP
FEMALE. Minute, small or medium sized species, rarely large. Head.
Decumbent scales on anterior dorsal margin and in center of vertex varied;
erect scales usually entirely dark; lateral patch of broad scales dark or pale;
palpus usually 0.2 of proboscis length, sometimes shorter; labial basal setae
usually as long as or longer than palpus, rarely shorter. Cibarial armature.
Very well developed; number and type of teeth varied. Thorax. Anterior half
18 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
of scutal disc usually with several, rarely only a few acrostichal bristles;
scutal scales narrow, fine and predominantly dark; pleuron usually dark on
the upper part, pale below; lower mep bristle usually present, sometimes ab-
sent. Wing. Plume scales on veins Ro. Re, Ry,. and branches of M small,
narrow, linear or clavate and moderatély dénse- Abdomen. Terga usually
entirely dark, rarely with basal pale bands or basolateral pale spots; sterna
usually paler than terga.
MALE. As in female except for the following. Head. Palpus usually from
0. 12 to 0.2 of proboscis length, sometimes longer to 0.5 or 0.75; labial false
joint present or absent; antennal flagellum weakly to strongly plumose, flagel-
lomeres 1-11 usually with minor whorls of 4-15 short and weak hairs in addi-
tion to large normal whorls of 10-40 long hairs. Tervminalia. Varied; tergal lobe
lobe of segment IX usually small, sometimes well developed; basimere usually
small, slender, roughly conical, rarely large or modified; subapical lobe clear-
ly divided into proximal and distal divisions or not, proximal division with 3
rod-like setae, number and type of setae on distal division varied; distimere
sickle-shaped or modified; phallosome broad oval or subspherical, sometimes
modified, denticles usually present, rarely absent; proctiger crown small-
medium sized, consisting of a few flat and blunt and several fine pointed spicu-
PUPA. Coloration of integument very pale to almost completely trans-
parent; wing, leg, antennal, palpal and labial cases partially dark; trumpet
dark, uniformly cylindrical, length varying from 0. 4 to 0.6 mm, index 8-10,
pinna with a narrow slit extended to meatus. All hairs present and usually
weak; the combination of following hairs are characteristic. Cephalothorax
and Metanotum. Hair 8-C 2-4b; 9-C usually double, rarely single; 10-C
usually double, sometimes more branched. Abdomen. Hair 5-IV double or
triple, rarely single; 5-V, VI usually double, rarely single or triple; 6-III-VI
2-9b, rarely single; 9-VII double or triple, subequal in length to 9-VIII or
slightly shorter; 9-VIII 5-6b, usually placed near to caudolateral angle, some-
times well removed cephalad. Paddle, External buttress moderately strong;
distal margin indistinct; midrib lightly pigmented and weakly sclerotized. 7
LARVA. Head entirely pale or with pattern of dark and light areas; siphon
usually pale or cream-colored, rarely dark or with median dark ring. The
following characters are diagnostic. Head. Antennal hairs 2, 3-A subapical;
hair 1-C a moderately stout and dark spine; 4-C very minute and rather incon-
spicuous; 9,6-C weak and short; 5-C single or double, about 0.5 of 6-C; usual-
ly double, its length usually not reaching beyond the anterior margin of fronto-
clypeus. Thorax. Hair 3-P always single and short, about 0. 25 of 1 or 2-P;
4-P usually weak and short, from 0.5 to as long as 3-P, rarely longer, 1-4b;
7-P single or double; 8-P single; 14-P double. Abdomen... Hairs 6-I, II double;
7-I single; 6-III-VI double or triple; comb scales numerous, usually undif-
ferentiated in size; 2-VII single. Siphon. Moderately long and slender, index
about 5; pecten teeth 8-12, distal teeth gradually longer to 4-5 times as long as
basal teeth, most distal teeth with 2-3 enlarged basal denticles and about 15
fine distal denticles; siphonal tufts 5-6 pairs (total 10-12) in number, all strong,
subequal, closely spaced and inserted more or less ventrally, the first 2-3
tufts at least 2 times as long as siphonal width at point of insertion, each tuft
usually 5-6b; median caudal filament of spiracular apparatus present and well
developed. Anal segment. Ventral brush with 6 pairs of hairs (total 12).
DISCUSSION. The mochthogenes group is the largest and most diverse in
the subgenus. The most up to date records include a total of 38 nominal spe-
cies, of which 10 are from the Ethiopian, 26 from the Oriental, 1 from the
Papuan part of the Australasian and 1 from the South Pacific. In the previous
study (Sirivanakarn 1971), only 33 nominal forms were listed and assigned to
8 different subgroups. The other 5 species which were not listed are 4 Ethio-
pian and 1 Oriental. All of these species are placed in the 8 subgroups of
Sirivanakarn (loc. cit.) as follows: (1) hinglungensis subgroup with hinglungen-
Sis, culionicus, tricontus and catavactarum; (2) uncinatus subgroup maith
uncinatus; (3) inconspicuosus subgroup with inconspicuosus, simtliciforceps,
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 19
castor, hamoni, mijanae, orstom, fimbriforceps, helenae, quintetti, ngangae
and bokorensis; (4) malayi subgroup with malayi, laureli and yeagerz; (5)
castrensis subgroup with castrensis, foliatus, latifoliatus, chiyutoi and
shrivastavii; (6) femineus subgroup with femineus; (7) otachati subgroup with
otachati and (8) tenuipalpis subgroup with tenuipalpis, hayashii, hackeri, ©
ape kiviensis, selai, campilunati, okinawae, lini, khazani, iphis and
rvichet,
In the Oriental region, the following changes have been made in the taxonomy
of the group: culionicus Delfinado (1966) is synonymized with hinglungensis Chu
1957); tricontus Delfinado (1966) is synonymized with catavactarum Edwards
He chiyutoi Baisas (1935) and shrivastavii Wattal, Kalra and Khrishnan
1966) are synonymized with foliatus Brug (1932); lini Lien (1968) is synonymized
with okinawae Bohart (1953) and baisasi is described as a new species. In sum-
mary, 23 species are here considered as valid taxa for the entire region. In
addition, an unnamed form which is known only in the pupal and larval stages is
also placed in the group as sp. 28. The 23 Oriental species are rearranged and
certain changes in the previous scheme of internal classification (Sirivanakarn
loc. cit. ) are being made as follows: - removing castvensis from castrensis
subgroup to hinglungensis subgroup; (2) recognizing foliatus as a new subgroup to
replace castrensis subgroup; 73) recognizing bokorensis subgroup for bokorensis
to separate it from the Ethiopian species in the inconspicuous subgroup and (4)
subdividing tenuitalpis subgroup into 5 distinct subgroups (bluvialis, khazani,
tenuipalpis, okinawae and ijhis). These realignment and detailed subdivisions
are primarily based on the male terminalia and secondarily on the type of de-
cumbent scales on the vertex and the plumosity of the flagellar whorls of the
male antenna. This new scheme consisting of 11 subgroups is as follows: (1)
uncinatus subgroup with uncinatus; (2) foliatus subgroup with foliatus and lati-
foliatus; (3) hinglungensis subgroup with hinglungensis, castrensis, cataractar-
um and baisasi; (4) malayi subgroup with malayi, laureli and yeageri; (5) pluvi-
alis subgroup with pluvialis, campilunati and selai; (6) khazani subgroup with
khazani; (7) tenuipalpis subgroup with tenuipalpis, richei, hayashii, hackeri
and kiviensis; (8) okinawae subgroup with okinawae; ek iphis subgroup with
iphis; (10) bokorensis subgroup with bokorensis and (11) otachati subgroup with
otachatt.
Five of the 11 subgroups (/oliatus, hinglungensis, malayi, pluvialis and
tenuipalpis) may well be considered as complexes of species with similar male
terminalia but show subtle differences in the details of the phallosome, basi-
mere, setae of the subapical lobe, distimere and other external adult charac-
ters. For a complete characterization and further discussion, see the treat-
ment of individual subgroups.
The majority of the mochthogenes species are strongly differentiated from
the other groups of Eumelanomyia by having male palpus as short as in the
female. The only exceptions are tenuipalpis, richei, hayashii and okinawae
which exhibit a longer male palpus ranging from 0. 5-0. 75 of the proboscis
length. This feature apparently overlaps with species in the protomelanoconion
group. In spite of this the 4 mentioned species essentially conform to the
mochthogenes group characters and undoubtedly belong to this group. Among the
11 subgroups, the uncinatus subgroup is clearly differentiated from all others
in the absence of a minor whorl of short hairs in the male antennal flagellum and
in the type of the male phallosome. The foliatus and hinglungensis subgroups |
are rather related and appear to form a single lineage. The tenuipalpis sub-
group shows more generalized features than any other subgroup and appears to be
most primitive as it contains species with short and long male palpi. On the
basis of the male morphology and the known immature stages, it is most prob-
able that the tenuipalpis subgroup is the original stem from-which the other 4
subgroups, including particularly: pluvialis, malayi, khazani and okinawae
were derived. The uncinatus, iphis, bokorensis and otachati subgroups, all
are monotypic and each apparently forms a distinct lineage.
20
3(2).
4(3).
5(4).
6(5).
7(1).
8(7).
9(8).
10(7).
11(10).
12 (11).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
KEYS TO SUBGROUPS AND SPECIES
FEMALES
(Unknown in hinglungensis, baisasi, selai, vichéi,
bokorensis, otachati and sp. 28)
Decumbent scales on anterior dorsal margin of vertex broad; scales
in central part of vertex broad or narrow. ...........
Decumbent scales on anterior dorsal margin and in central part of
vertex entirely narrow, a .ccd6 os See ce ee ss See Hac huperghigh -g
Anterior half of scutal disc with a complete row of several acrostichal
3
BEI ates wd ts ised. tele sk Vict a ae Pr Sela aie! 6S ari’ 4
Anterior half of scutal disc with a few acrostichal bristles (uncinatus
Sie POUD ec in sank Gee ee a ey nee EE uncinatus
Size very small or minute; wing length usually about 2.0 mm.
(hinglungensis subgroup, in part)..........6-. cataractarum
Size medium; wing length usually between 2.7-3.0 mm. ..... 4
Central part of vertex with narrow linear decumbent scales.
(elaaitve sabe rou) esis A ele pluvialis, campilunati
Central part of vertex with broad ovate decumbent scales (malayi
OME Th ) Sepdte igee aray ea 4) ele ahd ah gh ae sg S Sader cBit ol Paceaatah
Cibarial armature with 50-60 fine elongate teeth arranged in a row.
RES el wie gee eae MIRE. uate Aik al Baa. ek Deedes malayi
Cibarial armature with 30-40 coarser teeth arranged in a row.
ioe le fala teas Chie Sears iste ae WA haR MALT, Wdeonieet 2
Cibarial teeth about 40 in number. (Fig. 7D)......... laureli
Cibarial teeth about 30 in number. (Fig. 9B). ....... yeageri
Size very small or minute; wing length between 2.0-2.7 mm... 8
Size medium or large; wing length between 3.0-3.9mm..... 10
Very dark to nearly black; abdominal sterna as dark as or slightly
Se Sa OES ir Sita ot eer ea eee ania! bot Niet ai ge ne, CE
‘Brown or light brown; abdominal sterna much paler than terga.
Ud A BOD EOUD a) a: 8 6 cat S500 ee es tee ig FE Rhazani
Lower mep bristle present. (hinglungensis subgroup, in part).
castrensis
Lower mep bristle absent. (foliatus subgroup). . foliatus, latifoliatus
Labial basal setae short, about 0.5 of palpal length; size large,
wing length 3.9. mm...(7ph7S subgroup). 9.0.6 4 ee es iphis
Labial basal setae as long as or longer than palpus; size medium,
wing length about 3.0 mm. (tenuipalpis and okinawae SUDEP OUP Es,
Cibarial teeth poorly developed, middle part of cibarial bar with 12
minute teeth; lateral 4-6 teeth coarse and apically truncate. (Fig.
BO hich aetna pantie Ah a «tl Race Palen a walide Dal taa oe eee cola kiriensis'
Cibarial teeth very well developed, 50 or more teeth present, all
narrow, fine, elongate and equalin size. ........44.-.
Cibarial armature with 60-90 fine teeth arranged in row. (Figs.
rs Page Peed ee a en kp Rt MR OP pt oer a
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 21
13(12).
3(2).
4(3).
5(1).
6(5).
7(6).
8(7).
9(8).
Cibarial armature with about 50 teeth arranged in row. (Figs 12C,
BRE IO: PRM re hae eons eee gow ibe hayashti, okinawae
Cibarial teeth about 60 in number co. oo By AE EN, 44 tenuipalpis
Cibarial teeth about 90 in number (Fig. 14B)......... hackevi
MALES |
(Unknown in sp. 28)
PAI0US AOU Uy Ck BUC OUBO ten nieve 5s ict te A pee eek ee 5)
Palous about 0, 2-0. (3:08 Dropeseig. ogni oi baci Ae eee ee 2
Normal flagellar whorls of antenna weakly plumose, with 15-25
hairs; basimere and distimere of terminalia abnormally large
(Fig. 15A) (okinawae subgroup)......... . es es ORinawae
Normal flagellar whorls of antenna strongly plumose, with 30-40
hairs; basimere and distimere of terminalia small and slender
oust iualid s moore vent Ate APE ie wien ntvsnniegenibings dw weehe aetie. s
Basimere with or without 1 strong submarginal seta. .......
Basimere with a linear row of 4 submarginal setae (Fig. 12A).
rvichet
Basal half of distimere with 2-4 fine setae on dorsal surface; lateral
plate of phallosome with about 20 strong denticles (Fig. 10C); ab-
dominal terga usually with pale basal bands. ..... tenutpalpis
Basal half of distimere without any setae; lateral plate of phallosome
with about 7-10 strong denticles (Fig. 12B); abdominal terga entire-
A INN Bie. ces oc big ak pit OM othe’ hd A ex detrepeay again eros 1: riet mS hayashii
Normal flagellar whorls weakly plumose, with 10-25 hairs. ... 6
Normal flagellar whorls strongly plumose, with 30-40 hairs. .. 16
Antennal flagellomeres 1-11 without minor whorls of short hairs;
lateral plate of phallosome with a strong internal process (Fig. 4A)
Oia Ti GRR ONI e chae d)ailte bce ed Ge, celb cb avte., Sc uncinatus
Antennal flagellomeres 1-11 with minor whorls of short hairs; lateral
plate of phallosome without internal process. ......... , 7
Basimere strongly swollen basally; sack-like in shape; distimere
sharply angulate at middle dorsally (Fig. 17A) (bokorensis
Be PONE. 6 A a ee ed ea ig gules eg shel ee wy bokorensis
Basimere slender, conical, or slightly modified; distimere sickle-
shaped or modified, but not as above. ...........+...
Inner tergal surface of basimere lightly swollen, with a patch of
several weak and strong setae; tergum of segment IX witha
prominent median lobe bearing several strong setae and a linear
row of 7-8 weak setae on each side (Fig. 10B) (khazani subgroup).
Rhazani
Inner tergal surface of basimere not swollen, with or without strong
submarginal setae in row; tergum of segment IX with only two
small lateral lobes bearing 2-4 setae. ..........4e8-
Basimere witha linear row of 6-7 flattened, striated submarginal
setae; subapical lobe with setae clearly divided into proximal and
distal divisions (Fig. 15C) (his subgroup).......... iphis
Basimere without row of strong submarginal setae; subapical lobe
with setae in proximal and distal divisions closely packed apogee
22
10(9).
11(10).
12(11).
13(11).
14(13).
15(14).
16 (5).
17(16).
18(17).
Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
Lateral plate of phallosome dark, rodlike, with 6-7 large teeth on
lateral margin, ventral sternal lobe very broad and prominent
(Fig. 17B) Ciooheti SUPA ae cas la Skee es otachati
Lateral plate of phallosome pale, oval or tapered towards apex, with
several small denticles restricted to upper tergal surface; ventral
sternal lobe very poorly developed or small.......... 11
Distimere short and irregular in shape, 3-4 tiny setae present on
mid-dorsal surface; distal division of subapical lobe with a close-
set row of 5-6 strong bladelike setae; paraproct of proctiger with
a small basal sternal process (Figs. 4B, D) (foliatus subgroup).
Distimere short or long, sickle-shaped or slightly modified, mid-
dorsal surface without any setae; distal division of subapical lobe
with 1-3 hairlike and 2-5 pointed bladelike setae; paraproct of
proctiger without basal sternal process (Figs. 6A -D) (hinglungen-
SF NOUN. i, i ee Ge LC eee Se 13
Three proximal rods of subapical lobe stout, one forming an elbow
at middle; lateral plate of phallosome with denticles restricted to
tergal surface (Fig. 4B)..... ai Pee eee C aa foliatus
Three proximal rods of subapical lobe slender, all straight; lateral
plate of phallosome with denticles on tergal surface and on tergal
PU we Te) Oe iy es it eg Greene whi ds latifoliatus
Distal division of subapical lobe with 5 broad, acute lanceolate setae
which are serrated subapically; lateral plate of phallosome with
several strone denticles. (Fig. 6C). 0%. 2 2 ee a. baisasi
Distal division of subapical lobe with 2-3 hairlike setae only or also
with a few pointed simple bladelike setae in addition; lateral plate
of phallosome simple or with only a few very weak denticles. . 14
Distal division of subapical lobe with 2-3 hairlike setae only, proxi-
mal rods long and very slender; lateral plate of phallosome with or
without a few weak denticles (Fig. 6B). ....... cataractarum
Distal division of subapical lobe with 1-2 hairlike setae and 2-3
narrow pointed bladelike setae, proximal rods short and moder-
ately stout; lateral plate of phallosome without any denticles. . 15
Distimere claw slender, long and placed subapically; proctiger crown
with some flat and blunt spicules mixed with fine spinelike spicules
PS he sate re. eee ree gg ee hinglungensis
Distimere claw stout, short and placed apically; proctiger crown with
fine spinelike spicules only (Fig. 6D). ......... castrensis
Distimere furcate distally into a dorsal and a ventral arm (Figs. 7A,
Cane CA) Winn? eiberoup)? oe Se Pa eek ee ee 2 17
Distimere simple, sickle-shaped. ............4.2-+-ee- 19
Leaflet in distal division of subapical lobe bulbous basally, attenuate
distally; submarginal setae absent (Fig. 7C)........ laureli
Leaflet in distal division of subapical lobe broad, spatulate or oblong;
supmarcinal setae Present. os. sie. ce ke We wk es 18
Leaflet in distal division of subapical lobe spatulate (as in fig. 7a);
submarginal setae flattened, and striated.......... malayi
Leaflet in distal division of subapical lobe broad, oblong (as in fig.
9A); submarginal setae strong but not flattened or striated.
; yeageri
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 23
19(16). Basimere with a linear row of 4-7 strong submarginal setae; distal
division of subapical lobe with 1 external and 2 narrow internal leaf-
dels (ies sue vOUD). ie cee ee ee ne 20
Basimere with or without 1 strong submarginal seta; distal division
of subapical lobe with a narrow external leaflet and 4-5 narrow
bladelike setae (tenuipalpis subgroup, in part)......... 22
20(19). Apex of basimere witha clump of 6-7 strong setae sternally. (Fig.
21(20).
22(19).
7(6).
8(7).
1B Reet Sete bak ORG Aa ae MELEE iy tape MeN Gre bay Coe cL, camp ilunati
21
Lateral plate of phallosome elongate and tapered distally into a pointed
apex, denticles fine and numerous; basimere with 4-5 submarginal
Seale (ie OC ee te eee ee ee pluvialis
Lateral plate of phallosome short, tapered distally into a blunt apex,
5-7 strong denticles present; basimere with 5-7 submarginal setae
(Fig. 10A A} a on il aig hleNe gat Gye hen Sel Gesclisha ne aie ie pet BR api th 9 selai
Lateral plate of phallosome broad oval or P eetmerioal in shape (Fig.
DABS Bes sins Vacca evoh ead: eal NE oul MATER tb) renee el eal att ae aa Cc hackeri
Lateral plate of phallosome distally tapered into a pointed or blunt
a NO Ca ter: Mee Me Me ace ye ee a ute wipe ae tek! abate kiriensis
PUPAE
(Unknown in uncinatus, hinglungensis, castrensis,
cataractarum, pluvialis, cam{ilunati, selai,
Rhazani, richet, hackeri, ithis, bokorensis
and otachati)
Hair VOC SOO MOT. a ee ee ee RO aes 2
Fait TOSC som phere rise es ae eee a ee a a i See 4
Hairs 6=T01-V1 triple: o-V triples 22. 3241s eG ees ee ee sp. 28
Hairs 6-III-VI 4-6b; 5-V Phi se (Fig. 8A) oe subgroup). ee ee 3
Hairs 6=TI-VI usually 4b (4-5): 5-1V 40 0 ee aa malayi
Hairs 6-TI-VI usually 5-6b; 5-1V SPO eS Pk etek laureli and yeageri
Hair’8-C 2-4; hair 140 ‘sitigles: 2a0sis 26 eas) ak aes ree 2 ida t baisasi
Hair 8-C single or double, hair 11-C double. ............. 5)
Hair 8-C single or with 1 long and 1 short branch; hairs 5-V, VI 3-4b
Genuipalhis. suberown, in Dart), o ce Se is AERO Ses kiriensis
Hair 8-C double, both branches equally long; hairs 5-V, VI double. . 6
Hair 5-IV double; 4-VIII double (Fig. 5A) (foliatus subgroup).
latifoliatus, foliatus
Hair 5-IV usually 3-4b (2-4); 4-VIII single. ..........2004- 7
Hair 7-C single (Fig. 16A) (okinawae subgroup)......... okinawae
Hair yeC couble, (enypaiors Suveroup). =. gs ca ee ee ae 8
Hairs 6-III-VI 4b; hair 5-IV triple (Fig. 13A).......... hayashti
Hairs 6-III-VI double: hair 5-IV-double (Fig. 11A)...... tenuipalpis
24 - Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
LARVAE
(Unknown in uncinatus, hinglungensis, castrensis,
cataractarum, baisasi, pluvialis, campilunati,
selai, richei, hackeri, kiriensis, iphis,
bokorensis and otachaii)
is Hair 4-P strong and long, of the same magnitude as hairs 1 and 2-P;
ERAT okt PREC: sao h su utah tates whe te Sena ss pete ees cg ay pag 7 or eee
Hair 4-P weak, minute, as long as or shorter than 3-P; hair 3-P
BT Gas icci bs Sa ered apn nee aredeetas: Palau Sadie Es ie Pdicod sew tome ees os np 3
2(1). Hair 4-P triple; 5, 6-C strong, reaching beyond anterior margin of
frontoclypeus; siphonal tufts subventral, all short, about as long as
siphon width at points of insertion @azani subgroup). .... khazani
Hair 4-P single; 5, 6-C weak, their length not reaching beyond anterior
margin of frontoclypeus; siphonal tufts ventral, first 3-4 tufts strong,
about 2-3 times as long as siphonal width at points of insertion.
sp. 28
3(1). Abdominal segment VIII with a few large spine-like comb scales mixed
with several small, evenly fringed ones; hair 4-P as strong as 3-P
(Figs 88) We@iny? suberoup). 4 s8ss 6. eis See aes kw ae
Abdominal segment VIII with small, evenly fringed comb scales only;
hair 4-P shorter than 3-P or rather inconspicuous. ........
4(3). Head capsule with striking pattern of dark and pale areas; siphon usually —
with dark. methan and, 0a) eck els. Sete ER laureli, yeageri
Head capsule uniformly pale; siphon usually without dark band as above.
malayi
5(3). Hair 4-F 4b; rather small larva (Fig. 5B) (foliatus subgroup).
| sieges 7 foliatus, latifoliatus
Hair 4-P double; medium sized larva. ..........0+6.2e0880-
O15) nie GF ov oto bs: fovea ih Bess ete sa ese hs Gres em ele. S 7
Hairs 6-III-VI 3-4b (Fig. 13B) (¢enuipalpis subgroup, in part). . hayashii
7(6). Siphon strongly tapered and curved upwards distally; first 3-4 siphonal
tuft 4-5 times as long as siphon width at point of insertion (Fig. 11B)
Venuipalpis..euberoun? UE OAEE Ok 2505 oe eS Se wall wed tenuipalpis
Siphon slightly tapered and straight distally; first 3-4 siphonal tufts 2-3
times as long as siphonal width at points of insertion (Fig. 16B)
Rae BADSPOUR wok aod GORI Be RS okinawae
uncinatus subgroup
This subgroup is monotypic with a single species, uncinatus Delfinado 1966.
It was established by Sirivanakarn (1971) on the basis of the key characters
and is more completely characterized here under the description of this species.
It differs from all other mochthogenes species in the complete absence of minor
whorls distal to normal whorls in flagellomeres 1-11 of the male antenna and in
the presence of a strong internal process in the lateral plate of the male phal-
-losome. The latter feature is somewhat reminiscent of the mammilifer |
group of Lophoceraomyia but because it shows several mochthogenes characters,
I am therefore placing it with this group of Eumelanomyia. The immature .
stages are still unknown and in the distribution this species has been recorded
only from Samar in the Philippines.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 25
Do. Culex (Eumelanomyia) uncinatus
(Fig. 4A, o terminalia
Culex an ee oye uncinatus Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst.
i: 134 to, ¢ Relig
Culex (Eumelanomyia) uncinatus, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy). |
FEMALE. Wing 2.2 mm.; fore femur 1.4 mm.; proboscis 1.7 mm.
Rather small, pale brown species. Head. Vertex with numerous broad,
small decumbent scales forming a distinct ocular line anteriorly; decumbent »
scales in center of vertex and on occiput narrow and fine; lateral patch of
broad pale scales anteriorly, dark posteriorly; palpus slender, about 0. 13 of
proboscis length; labial basal setae of proboscis about as long as palpus.
Thorax. Integument of scutum and scutellum brown, all scales narrow, moder-
ately dense, same color as integument, acrostichal bristles sparse, only 2-3
pairs present on anterior half of scutal disc; pleuron slightly paler than scu-
tum, upper corner of st/ with a few pale translucent scales; lower mep bristle
absent. Legs. Coxae very pale; anterior surface of hindfemur with a pale
stripe extending from base to near apex. Wing. Scales on veins Ro and
narrow, dark and rather dense. Abdomen. Terga entirely dark; sferna
slightly paler.
MALE. | In general as described for female. Head. Palpus 0. 2 of pro-
boscis length; labial basal setae weak, about 0.5 of palpus; flagellar whorls
of antenna weakly plumose, minor whorls absent, normal whorls with 8-10
hairs which are as long as 5 flagellomeres. Terminalia (Fig. 4A). Tergal
lobe of segment IX small, with 3-4 moderately strong setae; basimere stout,
roughly conical, lateral tergal surface with several strong bristles, tergo-
mesal margin with a row of 6-7 short setae; proximal division of subapical
lobe with 2 slender, apically hooked rods and 1 slender, pointed rod; distal
division with 1 apically blunt and 1 pointed blade-like seta and 3-4 hair-like
setae; distimere well sclerotized, evenly curved, ventral seta strong, claw
short, pointed, placed apically; dorsal subapical seta minute, present or ab-
sent; lateral plate of phallosome with.a strong internal process which is about
0.5 of external process, external process broad in middle, tapered to a blunt
apex distally, denticles practically absent; proctiger crown. medium to rather
large in size, with several coarse and fine spicules, lateral paraproct without
basal sternal process, 4 cercal setae present.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (684. 19) with terminalia slide, Osmena,
Samar, PHILIPPINES, May 1945, Rozeboom, Knight and Laffoon (USNM);
eae 20 (684.20, 684.21) and 12 (684. 22) same data as holotype
USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The above description of uncinatus is based
on a study of the material in the type series originally described by Delfinado
(1966). The male terminalia agrees well with the description and figure by
this author except for the absence of the basal sternal process in the lateral
paraproct of the proctiger. The association of the female with the typical
male is presumptive only but appears to be correct as they are essentially
similar in external features. The female of uncinatus can be readily separ-
ated from the other species in the mochthogenes group by the presence of
fewer acrostichal bristles on the scutal disc, the absence of a lower mese-
pimeral bristle, and in the male by the complete absence of minor whorls on
the antennal flagellomeres and details of the terminalia as indicated in the keys
and as in the above description. Because of the distinctive male terminalia,
uncinatus is recognized as a distinct subgroup separated from other mochtho-
genes subgroups. Its affinity with other species is not clear and can not be
resolved until the immature stages are known. The male terminalia are rather
similar to the mammilifer group of Lophoceraomyia but the general adult
26 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
characters resemble all other members of the mochthogenes group so closely
that it seems best to be placed with the latter for the present.
BIOLOGY. The adults of uwncinatus were collected from a coconut shell,
but their associated immature stages were not preserved. No further data is
available.
foliatus subgroup
FEMALE. Very small or minute species, wing length 1.9-2.7 mm. dead.
Decumbent scales on anterior dorsal margin of vertex narrow, linear or cla-
vate, decumbent scales in center of vertex narrow, fine and entirely pale or
yellowish brown; palpus very thin and short, between 0. 17-0. 2 of proboscis
length; labial basal setae strong, dark, as long as or longer than palpus.
Thorax. Acrostichal bristles present; pleuron dark upper half, paler on
lower half; lower mep bristle absent. Abdomen. Terga entirely dark scaled;
_sterna slightly paler or as dark as terga.
MALE. In general similar to female except for the following. Head. Pal-
_ pus about 0.2 of proboscis length; labial basal setae 0. 5 of palpal length; pro-
boscis without clearly marked false joint; normal flagellar whorls of antenna
with 15-20 hairs which are moderately long. Terminalia. Tergal lobe of seg-
ment IX very small, bearing 3-5 tiny hair-like setae; basimere small, more or
less conical; subapical lobe with 3 stout or slender rod-like setae proximally
and 9-6 broad blade-like setae distally, leaflet absent; distimere rather short,
irregular in shape, mid-dorsal surface with 3-4 setae, subapical claw stout
and short; lateral plate of phallosome very broad in middle, distally tapered
into a blunt apex, denticles strong, varied in number; proctiger crown small,
dark, consisting of 4-5 flat and blunt spicules laterally and several fine pointed
spicules mesally, lateral paraproct with a small basal sternal process.
UPA. Abdomen 1.7-2.0 mm, paddle 0. 40-0.54 mm, trumpet 0. 4-0. 52
mm, index 10. In general very pale or creamy white except for dark brown
trumpet; the foilowing hairs are diagnostic. Cephalothorax and Metanotum.
Hairs 8-10-C double. Abdomen. Most hairs rather weak; hairs 5-IV, V
double; 4-VUI double. .
LARVA. Head 0.60-0.64 mm, siphon 0.91-1.0 mm, index 7-8, siphon/sad-
dle ratio 4-5. In general very pale and without striking color pattern. Head.
Antennal shaft predominantly pale, proximal 0.75 with several fine spicules;
hairs 5, 6-C very weak and short, 6-C about 0.5 of antennal length, 5-C re-
duced to 0.5 of 6-C, both hairs double. Thovax. Hair 3-P 0. 25 of the length of
1 or 2-P, always single; 4-P minute, considerably shorter than 3-P, triple or
4b. Abdomen. Hairs 6-III-VI usually triple (2-4); all comb scales small and
with even fringes of fine spicules apically; siphon entirely pale, yellowish white
and rather slender, distally lightly tapered.
DISCUSSION. The /foliatus subgroup is recognized here to replace the cas-
trensis subgroup in the previous scheme of Sirivanakarn (1971). The foliatus
subgroup in the present sence includes only foliatus Brug 1932 and latifoliatus
Delfinado 1966. The other 2 nominal forms: chiyutoi Baisas 1935 and shvi-
vastaviit Wattal, Kalra and Khrishnan 1966 which were assigned to the castren-
sis subgroup in the previous scheme (Sirivanakarn loc. cit. ) are considered as
synonyms of foliatus. The 2 included species: /foliatus and latifoliatus are
closely similar in all stages, but can be distinguished from each other in the
male terminalia as indicated in the key and as in the descriptions below.. 2
The foliatus subgroup apparently shows a strong affinity with the members
of the hinglungensis subgroup. These 2 subgroups show a great deal of overlap:
in general adult characters but are, however, separable from each other by
the differences in the shape of the distimere, setae of the subapical lobe and in
the phallosome of the male terminalia. The pupa and larva of the foliatus sub-
group show a great deal of similarity to the tenuifalfis and okinawae subgroups
in many features of the chaetotaxy but are distinct from the malayi subgroup in
the type of comb scales. Both stages are generally distinguished from the other
3 subgroups by the relatively small size and by the branching of certain hairs as
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 27
indicated in the keys and as in the above descriptions.
The breeding habitats of the members of the foliatus isbevotin are small
ground pools in the vicinity of streams under heavy shade of tropical forest.
This subgroup appears to be widely distributed throughout Southeast Asia and
adjacent areas, but at present it has been definitely recorded only from India,
Ceylon, Andaman Islands, Thailand, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia
(only Java) and the Philippines.
6. Culex (Eumelanomyta) foliatus Brug
(Figs. 4B, o terminalia; 4C, 2 cibarial armature;
5A, pupa; 5B, larva)
Culex (Culex) castrensis var. foliatus Brug 1932, Bull. ent. Res. 23: 82
(o*, P*, L*); Peter and Dewar 1956, Indian J. Malar. 10: 37-51 (o*),
Culex (Mochthoz ~enes) chiyutoi Baisas 1935 Pintipp. J. "Sci. “51: Tre t*. 2 )
Bohart 1945, U. S. Navmed 580: 73 (o*); Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer.
Ent. Inst. 7: 129 (o*), Synonymy with Culex (Mochthogenes) foliatus by
Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 34.
Culex (Mochthogenes) shrivastavii Wattal, Kalra and Khrishnan 1966, Bull.
Indian Soc. Malar. Comm. Dis. 3: 159 (s*), NEW SYNONYM.
Culex ORME Sagres) foliatus, Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 34
L*
Culex (Eumelanomyia) foliatus, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.0-2.7 mm, fore femur 1.0-1.4 mm, proboscis 1. 2-
1.44 mm, abdomen 1.3-1.5 mm. Small, very dark to black species. Head.
Decumbent scales on dorsum of vertex narrow and fine, predominantly pale
yellowish; lateral patch of broad scales dingy or bluish white; erect scales
slender, numerous and entirely dark; palpus very short, about 0.17 of proboscis
length; proboscis with 4 labial basal setae, 2 lateral ones as long as palpus;
antenna longer than proboscis by about the length of the terminal segment.
Cibarial armature (Fig. 4C). Cibarial bar with about 24 teeth, 14 middle teeth
very narrow and apically pointed, 7-9 lateral teeth coarser, apically truncated
or abruptly pointed. Thorax. Scutal integument black; scutal scales narrow
and predominantly dark; acrostichal bristles present; dorsocentral very strong
and dark; pronotum and upper part of pleuron as dark as scutum; lower part of
pleuron pale greenish; 77 with 1 strong and 3-4 weak setae; lower mep bristle
absent. Legs. All coxae very pale greenish; anterior surface of hind femur
with a pale white stripe extending from base to poe apex; all tibiae and tarsi
dark to black scaled. Wing. Scales on veins and R narrow and fine.
Abdomen. Terga entirely black scaled; sterna 2 iol ly pal er Br sometimes as
dark as terga.
MALE. In general as in female, with the following distinctive features.
Head. Palpus about 0. 2 of proboscis length; proboscis rather thin, false joint
absent, labial basal setae very weak, short, hairlike; normal flagellar whorls
weakly plumose, with about 20 hairs, minor whorls with 7-8 short hairs.
Terminalia (Fig. 4B). Tergum IX with poorly developed tergal lobe, bearing
3-4 short and weak setae; sternum IX broad, rectangular and practically bare;
basimere very small, conical, about 0.14 mm in length, inner tergal surface
without strong submarginal setae; subapical lobe broad, not projecting, proxi-
mal division with 3 rodlike setae of which 1 is swollen, strongly curved, form-
ing an elbow at middle, 2 other rods thin, more or less straight, distal division
with a row of 5-6 broad bladelike setae which are pointed or blunt apically,
leaflet absent; distimere short, about 0.5 of basimere in length, basal half
swollen dorsally, distal half lightly tapered into a blunt or truncate apex, sub-
apical claw stout and short, mid-dorsal surface with 3-4 tiny setae; phallosome
oval shaped, apical half of lateral plate tapered into a blunt tip, inner tergal
surface with 7-8 strong and 4-6 weak denticles, upper part of tergal bridge
with or without fine spicules; proctiger crown small, with 3-4 flat and blunt and
28 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
several fine and pointed spicules, lateral paraproct with a short basal sternal
process and a small apical lobe, cercal setae 3 or 4 in number.
PUPA (Fig. 5A). Abdomen 1.7-1.9 mm, paddle 0. 40-0. 46 mm, trumpet
0.4 mm, index about 10. Pigmentation entirely yellowish white except for
darkened areas on antenna, leg and wing cases; trumpet dark, nearly uni-
formly cylindrical except for slightly widened pinna, pinna with a short slit
extending to meatus; chaetotaxy as figured, the following hairs are diagnostic.
Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C double; 9-C usually double, rarely
single; 10 and 11-C double. Abdomen. Hairs 5-IV-VI double; 1-III-VII usually
5 or 6(4-7), 7(5-9), 6(4-7), 3 and 2 or 3b respectively; 6-III-VI usually 2(2-3),
3(2-4), 3(2-3) and 3(1-3)b respectively; hair 2-VII always internal to 1-VII;
9-VII very short and weak, 2b; 4-VII single or double; 9-VIII 4 or 5b, placed
very near to caudolateral angle. Paddle, Paler than abdomen; external buttress
weakly sclerotized; external distal margin practically smooth or provided with
a few eee of minute spicules; midrib very weak and pale; hairs 1 and 2-P
present.
LARVA (Fig. 5B). Head 0.6 mm, siphon 0.9-1.0 mm, index 7-8, saddle
0.26mm, siphon/saddle ratio 4-5. Pigmentation variable from pale white
entirely to partially dark or bluish green on head, thorax and abdomen. Head.
Antennal shaft dark at extreme base, creamy white in the middle and lightly
darkened beyond hair 1-A; hairs 2 and 3-A subapical; hair 1-C a dark, moder-
_ ately stout spine; hairs 4, 5 and 6-C close together, 4-C minute and rather
inconspicuous; 5-C very weak and short, about 0.6 of 6-C in length, double;
6-C double, its length not reaching beyond anterior margin of frontoclypeus;
7-C with 4-6 pectinated branches; 13-C double; 14-C double; 16, 17-C present
as minute spicules; mentum with a large median tooth and 6 lateral teeth on
each side. Thorax. Unspiculated; hairs 1-3-P single, 3-P about 0.25 of 1 or
2-P; 4-P minute, considerably shorter than 3-P, usually 3 or 4b; 7-P usually
double (1-2); 8-P single; 14-P double; 3-M double; 4-M 2-4b; 8-M 3, 4b; 9-M
-4b; 7-T 4-6b; 9-T 4b. Abdomen.. Unspiculated; most.hairs very weakly
developed; hairs 6-I, II double; 7-I single; 6-II-VI usually 3(3-4), 3(3-4), 3
and 3(2-3)b respectively; hairs 1-III-VI usually 4b(3-5); 1-VII 6b(5-7); 4-VII
single; comb scales 30-40 in number, aggregating in 3 or 4 rows, all scales
with even apical fringes of fine spicules. Siphon. Entirely pale yellowish and
moderately long, distally slightly tapered; pecten teeth 8-10 in number, distal
teeth 4-5 times as long as basal teeth, denticles 18-19 in number; subventral
tufts strong, 5-6 pairs in number, 4-5b each, first 4 tufts about twice as long as
siphon width at point of attachment, most distal tuft shortest, about 1. 5 of
or as long as siphon width; median caudal filament very well developed. Anal
segment. Hair 2-X with 1 short and 1 long branch; ventral brush consists of
6 pairs of hairs, all inserted within grid; anal gills very slender, 1.0-1. 5 of
the length of saddle. ‘ . | :
TYPE DATA. (1) Culex (C.) castrensis var. foliatus Brug 1932, holotype:
male with terminalia mounted on plastic slip attached to pin, Bandung, Java
INDONESIA, July 1929, S. L. Brug (BM). (2) Culex(M.)chiyutoi Baisas 1935,
lectotype: male with slide of terminalia, Kolambugan, Lanao, Mindanao,
PHILIPPINES(USNM); SELECTION OF BRAM (1967: 37). (3) Culex (M.)
shrivastavii Wattal, Kalra and Khrishnan 1966, holotype: male, Ferrar Ganj,
ANDAMAN ISLANDS, 27 V 1965, Bhola Ram (National Institute of Communi-
cable Disease, Delhi, India).
DISTRIBUTION. Material examined: 1750, 1569, 55 P, 71 L; 226 with
associated skins (182 p, 44 lp). — |
ANDAMAN ISLANDS. Jarkatang, 2¢.
THAILAND. Mae Hong Son: Ban Mae Tia; Doi Chang; Ban Hua Yang;
2c, 1 P, 2 lp. Chiang Mai: Doi Sutep; Chiang Dao; 3c, 39, 2 P, 21, 2 p,
1lp. Lamtang: Ampur Tern; Ban Pha Daeng; Ban Pang Paka: 5¢, 69, 2.P,
2L, 5p, 7Ip. Nan: Ban Wang Mo, 1P. Phrae: Ban Noi Rong Nok, 1 P.
Tak: Huey Lan Saeng, 6c, 69, 12 p. Nakhon Ratchasima: Pak Chong; Muak
Lek; Ban Tha Ma Prang; Khlong Pai; Khao Suan Hom; To oy, tes. 4 By. ok aD
Nakhon Nayok: Huey Sai Noi; Khao Sing To; 2c, 29, 2 P, 2 L, 1p, 2 lp.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 29
Kanchanaburi: Huey Mae Nam Noi, 2 P, 2 L. Chon Buri: Siracha, Bang
Phra, 1c, llp. Chantabuvi: Ban Tha Mai; Ban Bang Phu; Khao Sai Dao;
14°, 269, 29 P, 3 L, 3l1p, 4lp. Tvat: Koh Chang, Ban Salak Pet; Khao Yai
Yai; Khao Chang Yai; 70,112, 15 p. Pvachuap Khiri Khan: Tub Sakae, 19, —
Ranong: Khlong Set Takuat; Khao Hin Chang; 2,19, 3p. Fhangnga: Nam
Tai, 1¢°,19, lp. Kvabi: Ban Mai Kien Tai; Khao Aopong; 1¢,19, ;
Phuket: Khao Chang Yai; Khao Prathin; Ban Huey Luk; 38,159, 49 p, 4 Ip.
Songkhla: Boripat Water Fall; Tone Nga Chang Water Fall; 11°,99, 5 P, 15p,
21p. Yala: Yala Bong, 9°,19, 8p, 2lp. Narathiwat: Khau Lau, 9c’, 219,,
4 P, 24p, 5 lp. |
S. VIETNAM. Danang, 1 L.
HONG KONG. Sai Tung District, 2°,39, 3p, 2 lp.
TAIWAN. Tung Shi, 19, 6 L.
MALAYSIA. East Malaysia: Pahang - Pulau Tioman; Gunong Benom;
Chegar Perah; 30¢,299, 3 P, 27 L, 5p, 101lp. West Malaysia: Savawak-
Tebangan, 1c. Sabah Kudat; Jesselton; 20,19. :
INDONESIA. Java: Bandung, 20".
PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Subic Bay; Subic Naval Base; Dingalam Bay,
Tayabas; 40,79, 6 L, 4lp. Mindoro: San Jose, 14 L. Palawan: Iwahig;
Puerto Princesa; 2 L. Samar: Osmena, 3 P, 3 L. Leyte: Lago Lago Baybay,
60°, Mindanao: Lanao, Kolambugan; Parang; 8. ;
’ Additional records from the literature: NEPAL; INDIA; CEYLON (Peter
and Dewar 1956); CHINA, Hainan Island (Chu 1957); INDONESIA, Alor (Brug
and Bonne- Wepster 1947). :
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. I have checked the type and other topotypic
material of foliatus Brug 1932 from Java against the type of castrensis
Edwards 1922 from India and definitely agree with Bram (1967) in elevating
it to a full species instead of a variety of the latter as done by Brug. Ialso
agree with Bram (loc. cit.) in treating chiyutoi Baisas 1935 from the Philippines
as a synonym of this species on the basis of similarity in the male terminalia
and larval stage. In addition, Iam also synonymizing shrivastavii Wattal,
Kalra and Khrishnan 1966 from the Andaman Islands with foliatus based on the
comparison of the type specimen by Dr. B. L. Wattal in India. The 2 topotypic
males of shrivastavii which were kindly sent tous by Dr. B. L. Wattal for
confirmation are essentially similar to foliatus, leaving no doubt that both
forms are conspecific.
C. foliatus is one of the most common and widely spread species in South-
east Asia and adjacent areas. Its range of distribution extends to the northwest
in Nepal and India, to the west in Ceylon and Andaman Islands, to the north.
to China, Hongkong and Taiwan, to the east to the Philippines and to the south
to Java and Alor, Indonesia. There is no significant variation in the diagnostic
characters of all stages of foliatus and all specimens which I have examined
from several localities essentially conform to a single type. It can be readily
recognized in the male by (1) setae of the subapical lobe and (2) shape and
other features of the distimere of the terminalia; in the female by (1) narrow,
linear decumbent scales on the dorsum of vertex, (2) absence of lower mese-
pimeral bristle and (3) cibarial teeth; in the pupa by (1) double branching of
hair 8-C and (2) double branching of hairs 5-IV-VI; and in the larva by (1)
minute prothoracic hair 4-P which is 3-4-branched, (2) undifferentiated comb
scales and (3) pale siphon and its strong subventral tufts. 3
BIOLOGY. The breeding habitats of foliatus are usually small ground
pools at stream margins or in the middle of dried up streams. On certain
occasions, the immature stages have also been found in rock pools and foot
prints. These habitats were under heavy shade of tropical forest at an altitude
ranging from about sea level to 900 meters or more. The adults were collected
while resting on branches or leaves of tree seedlings and shrubs near their
breeding sites. Although foliatus is very common, it has never been reported
to attack man or other animals in nature.
30 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
7. Culex (Eumelanomyia) latifoliatus Delfinado
(Fig. 4D, o terminalia)
Culex Ge Te latifoliatus Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst.
Tits (ots Fs
Culex (Eumelanomyia) latifoliatus, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy). | |
FEMALE. Wing 2.7 mm. fore femur 1.33 mm, proboscis 1.6 mm. Ex-
tremely similar to foliatus, differing in the following features. Head, Decum-
bent scales on dorsal anterior ocular line of vertex coarser, clavate; decum-
bent scales in center of vertex and occiput fewer and apparently coarser;
lateral patch of broad appressed scales darker. Cibarial armature. Not
studied. :
MALE. Differing from foliatus as in the female and in the following |
additional features. Head, Normal flagellar whorls of antenna more strongly
plumose. Terminalia (Fig. 4D). Very similar to foliatus except as follows:
proximal division of subapical lobe with 3 rodlike setae which are more
slender, subequal in length and more or less straight; lateral plate of phallo-
some with more numerous strong denticles, upper part of tergal bridge with
several fine, but distinct spicules; lateral paraproct with a more distinct
basal sternal process. Pies
PUPA. Abdomen 2.0 mm, paddle 0.54 mm, trumpet 0.52 mm, index 10.
Essentially as described and figured for foliatus, differing only in the following.
Abdomen, Hair 6-III triple; 6-IV, V 4b; 9-VII stronger, triple.
LARVA. Head 0.64 mm, siphon 1.0 mm, index 7, siphon/saddle ratio.
- about 4. As described and figured for foliatus, differing chiefly in the follow-
ing. Head, Hair 5-C stronger, about 0.75 of the length of hair 6-C; 6-C longer,
reaching anterior margin of frontoclypeus. Thorax. Hair 7-P always double.
Abdomen. Hairs 1-IV, V 5-6b; 1-VII 7b. .
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male with slide of terminalia, Malawin Creek,
ac Laguna, Luzon, PHILIPPINES, 18 January 1935, F. E. Baisas
USNM).
~ DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the Philippines. Material examined:
120°, 19, 8 L; 2 with associated larval and pupal skins.
PHILIPPINES. Luzon: College, Laguna, Malawin Creek; Mt. Makiling;
30. Mindoro: San Jose, 5°, 8 L. Palawan: Balshahan River, 4 mi inland;
Cabayugan, Marble Mountain; Panitan; 4, 19, 2 lp.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. latifoliatus is endemic to the Philippines
where it has been found only in Luzon, Mindoro and Palawan. It is probably
more widely distributed than the present records show. In the islands where
it occurs it was found to be sympatric with foliatus. This species is very
closely related to foliatus from which it can be distinguished in the adult
by the coarser decumbent scales on the vertex and by the slender, more or
less straight rodlike setae in the subapical lobe of the male terminalia. The
pupa and larva are described from a few reared specimens. Both stages show
a great deal of overlap in general and in the detailed chaetotaxy with foliatus
except for a few characters as indicated in the keys and in the above diagnosis.
There is apparently no overlap in the diagnostic features of the male terminalia
between latifoliatus and foliatus and since both forms are sympatric, Iam con-.
vinced that they are specifically distinct. |
The above description of the adults of latifoliatus is similar to that by
Delfinado (1966: 131) except for the absence of a lower mesepimeral bristle.
The female designated as allotype by Delfinado (loc. cit.) is incorrect as this
specimen has the vertex entirely covered with broad scales and a lower mese-
pimeral bristle. It appears most probable that this female belongs to laureli
or yeage7vi.
BIOLOGY. The breeding sites of latifoliatus include ground pools and rock
pools near stream or creek under heavy shade of forest. In one case the
immatures were collected from a puddle in an open rice field. The adults were
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 31
also caught while resting among vegetation near their breeding site. Adult
biology is not known.
hinglungensis subgroup
FEMALE. Minute species; wing length about 2.0 mm. In general very
similar to foliatus subgroup, differing in the following features. Head, De-
cumbent scales on anterior dorsal margin of vertex varied from predominantly
broad to narrow clavate; decumbent scales in center of vertex broad and dark
or sometimes narrow, linear and yellowish brown; palpus more slender and
shorter, about 0. 12-0. 13 of proboscis length. Thorax. Pleuron uniformly
pale or sometimes dark on upper half, paler below; lower me? bristle usually
present, sometimes absent. Abdomen. Terga and sterna usually entirely
dark scaled, sterna sometimes paler than terga.
| MALE. In general as described for female. Head, Normal flagellar
whorls of antenna with 7-12 hairs which are rather weak and short. Terminalia.
Basimere very small, conical; subapical lobe with 3 slender and short rodlike
setae proximally and a variable number of narrow, pointed blades distally,
the latter are sometimes replaced by hairlike setae; leaflet absent; distimere
typically sickle-shaped, sometimes slightly modified, mid-dorsal surface
without any setae; terminal claw small, usually subapical, sometimes apical;
lateral plate of phallosome small, distally tapered to a blunt apex, denticles
usually completely absent, sometimes present; proctiger crown very small
with only a few coarse and fine spicules, sometimes of medium size with
several spicules; lateral paraproct without basal sternal process.
PUPA (baisasi only). In general as described for foliatus subgroup,
differing particularly in the following. Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hairs
8-C triple, 9, 10-C double. Abdomen. Hair 5-IV single.
LARVA. Unknown.
DISCUSSION. The hinglungensis subgroup was established by Sirivanakarn
(1971) to include 4 nominal species: hinglungensis Chu 1957, culionicus
Delfinado 1966, tvzcontus Delfinado 1966 and cataractarum Edwards 1923. In
the present study, culionicus is regarded as a synonym of hinglungensis and
tricontus as a synonym of catavactarum. In addition, castrensis which was
earlier placed in the castrensis subgroup is now transferred to this subgroup.
An additional species, faisasin. sp. is also placed here, making the total of
4 valid taxa for the whole subgroup. The hinglungensis subgroupas character-
ized above is apparently more heterogeneous than the foliatus subgroup. It is
clearly differentiated from the latter by the sickle-shaped distimere, setae of
the subapical lobe and the absence of a small basal sternal process in the
lateral paraproct of the proctiger of the male terminalia. The 4 members in
this subgroup are all distinct and can be definitely identified by the differences
in the male terminalia. The immature stages are unknown except for the pupa
of baisasi. 3
A pupa of baisasi was reported to have been collected from an axil of
Colocasia sp. and another from a rock pool. It appears most likely that the
other members in this subgroup are ground pool breeders. This subgroup may
contain more species than recognized here. At present, it has been recorded
only from Thailand, Cambodia, Hainan Island and the Philippines and from
New Britain in the Papuan part of the Australasian region.
8. Culex (Eumelanomyia) hinglungensis Chu
(Fig. 6A, o terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) hinglungensis Chu 1957, Acta zool. Sinica, 9: 163 (c'*);
Chu 1958, Indian J. Malar. 12: 111 (list); Bram 1967,. Contrib. Amer.
Ent. Inst: 2737 1e*),
Culex (Mochthogenes) culionicus Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 180 (o*), NEW SYNONYMY. )
32 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
Culex (Eumelanomyia) hinglungensis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy). 3
FEMALE. Unknown.
MALE. Very small or minute, brown to black species; wing length 1.9 mm.
In general as described for the subgroup with the following diagnostic features.
Head, Decumbent scales on dorsum of vertex broad and predominantly pale
forming a distinct ocular line, pale brown posterolaterally; narrow decumbent
scales rather few, yellowish brown, restricted to dorsal midline in center and
to occiput; erect scales rather few in number, predominantly pale or dark;
lateral patch of broad appressed scales brown to dark; palpus very thin and
short, about 0. 15 of proboscis length; proboscis slender, 6 dark strong labial
basal setae present, lateral ones strongest, slightly longer than palpus, false
joint absent; antenna as long as proboscis, normal flagellar whorls very weakly
plumose, with 10-12 hairs each, minor whorls with 5-6 short hairs; flagello-
meres 1-11 with several minute setae in addition. Thorax. Acrostichal bristles
present, rather weak and short; dorsocentrals strong and dark; pleuron uni- :
formly pale brown, scales practically absent; anterior lower mep bristle pre-
sent. Legs. All femora, tibiae and tarsi dark scaled. Wing. Plume scales
small, narrow, clavate and moderately dense on all veins. Abdomen. Terga
and sterna entirely dark to black scaled. Terminalia (Fig. 6A). Tergal lobe of.
segment IX very poorly developed, with a linear row of 4-6 short and tiny setae,
sternum [X without scales or setae; basimere small, conical, about 0.13 mm
in length; subapical lobe directed mesad, proximal division with 3 rodlike setae,
2 of which are stout with truncated apices, 1 thinner with pointed apex, distal
division with 1 external basal seta and a mesal group of 1 or 2 fine hair-like
and 2 or 3 lanceolate setae; distimere short, sickle-shaped, about 0.5 of the
length of basimere; ventral subapical seta present just beyond the midpoint,
subapical claw rather long, about 0.25 of the length of distimere; phallosome
oval-shaped, very well sclerotized, lateral plate strongly tapered into a point
or blunt apex which is slightly hooked, denticles practically absent; proctiger
crown small, with 4-5 flat and blunt and a few fine and pointed spicules; lateral
paraproct very thin, apical lobe absent or not developed, basal sternal process
absent; cercal setae usually 2 in number, sometimes 3 or 4.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown. |
TYPE DATA. (1) Culex (M.) hinglungensis, holotype: male, caught in the
crevice of rocks near mountain stream, Hing-Lung, Hainan Island, CHINA,
May 1954 (Dept. Parasit. Second Military College, China). (2) Culex (M.)
culionicus .Delfinado 1966, holotype: male, San Pedro, Culion Island, Palawan,
PHILIPPINES, 26 March 1947, H. Hoogstraal (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Material examined: 11<¢.
THAILAND. Chiang Mai: Chiang Dao, 1c.
CAMBODIA. Kirirom, 3¢.
PHILIPPINES. Mindoro: San Jose; Bulacan; 2c. Palawan: Culion, San
Pedro; Puerto Princesa; 5c.
Additional record from the literature: Hainan Island (Type locality),
CHINA (Chu 1957). |
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. I have not seen the type of this species but
from checking the male characters with the published description and the
figure of hinglungensis by Chu (1957) Iam convinced that the present inter-
pretation and the assignment of the male specimens listed above to this species |
is correct. C. hinglungensis is apparently widely spread, but at present it is
-known only from Hainan, China, Thailand, Cambodia and the Philippines. The
above synonymy of culionicus Delfinado 1966 with hinglungensis is based on the
comparison between the specimens from the Philippines ae culionicus) with
those from Thailand and Cambodia (as hinglungensis). Both nominal forms
resemble each other very closely in the details of the male terminalia indicat-
ing that they are undoubtedly conspecific. The Philippine males differ
slightly in being paler and in having a few more spicules in the proctiger
crown but these differences do not appear to be sufficiently distinct to warrant
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 33
their recognition as a separated species. ;
C. hinglungensis shows a great deal of superficial resemblance to foliatus
and latifoliatus but is clearly separated from the latter two species by (1) hav-
ing broad scales covering most of the vertex; (2) presence of a lower mese-
pimeral bristle and (3) several features of the male terminalia as described
and as illustrated. It is apparently closely similar to castrensis from India
and Ceylon, but can be separated from the latter as indicated in the key and
as in the description given above.
BIOLOGY. In Hainan, the single type male of hinglungensis was caught
among rock crevices near a mountain stream (Chu, 1957). The males from
Thailand and Cambodia were also collected in mountainous areas. No field
data is available for the collection of the specimens (as culionicus) from the
Philippines. The breeding habitat is unknown.
9. Culex (Eumelanomyia) castrensis Edwards
(Fig. 6D, ¢& terminalia)
Culex castrensis Edwards 1922a, Indian J. med. Res. 10: 285 (New name for
Aedes nigrescens Theobald 1907); Barraud 1924a, Indian J. med. Res.
115: 1280 44,22);
Aedes nigrescens Theobald 1907, Mon. Cul. 4: 540 (o, 2). Preoccupied by
Danielsia nigrescens Theobald 1907 (Edwards 1922a).
Culex (Mochthogenes) castrensis Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. ,
fasc. 194: 195 (taxonomy); Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera,
i eae tor. ey.
Culex (Eumelanomyia) castrensis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
‘Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. A minute and dark species; wing length about 2.0 mm. Essen-
tially as described by Edwards (1922: 285) who was later quoted by Barraud
(1924a: 1280) and Barraud (1934: 355) and as in the following. Head. Vertex
with numerous yellowish pale narrow decumbent scales in the center; erect
scales slender and rather fine, predominantly pale; frontal bristle weaker
and paler than lateral ocular bristles; palpus about 0.2 of proboscis length;
labial basal setae strong and as long as palpus. Thovax. Scutal scales fine
and predominantly dark except for paler ones on anterior promontory and
anterior margin of fossa; acrostichal bristles well developed; pleuron with
darkened area in the upper region, paler below; 1 lower me? bristle present.
Wing. Scales very narrow and dark. Abdomen. Terga entirely dark scaled;
sterna paler scaled.
MALE. Wing 1.7 mm, fore femur 0.8 mm, proboscis 1.2 mm. Similar
to female in general characters and in relative length of palpus, differing as
follows. Head. Proboscis without distinct false joint; labium slender in basal
half, slightly thicker in apical half; antennal flagellar whorls weakly plumose,
normal whorl with about 15 hairs; minor whorls with 4-5 short hairs. Termin-
alia (Fig. 6D). As figured; very small and exceedingly similar to hinglungen-
sis except for the following: subapical lobe of basimere with 3 slender rod-
like setae in proximal division and 2 narrower flattened acute setae and 2-3
fine hairlike setae in distal division, external basal seta absent; distimere
rather distinct in shape, somewhat angled on mid-dorsal surface, terminal
claw shorter, placed more or less apically; lateral plate of phallosome
strongly diverging towards apex, with or without a few weak denticles; proc-
tiger crown consisting of fine, pointed, spinelike spicules only, 4 cercal
setae present. —
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male marked as type by Edwards, with attached
terminalia mount, Castle Rock, N. Kanara, Bombay, INDIA, 5 April 1902,
James (BM). PRESENT SELECTION.
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from India and Ceylon. Material examined:
2% and 12. INDIA. Bombay, N. Kanara, Castle Rock, 1¢, 1%. CEYLON,
34 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
Suduganga, 1c. |
~ TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The above description of castrensis is based
on a male and a female originally marked as types by Edwards (1922) from
India and on a male identified by Edwards from Ceylon. This species is some-
what intermediate between the foliatus and hinglungensis subgroups. The
general adult features resemble foliatus but the male terminalia resembles
hinglungensis. Based on the latter feature, Iam now placing castrensis with
the hinglungensis subgroup instead of the castrensis subgroup in the previous
scheme (Sirivanakarn 1971). It is separated from members of the foliatus
subgroup in general by the presence of a lower mesepimeral bristle and in the
male terminalia by the setae of the subapical lobe, shape of the distimere and
lateral plate of phallosome. The male terminalia are extremely similar to _
hinglungensis from which they differ slightly as indicated in the key and in the
above diagnosis. It can also be separated from hinglungensis most readily by
the narrower decumbent scales on the dorsum of the vertex.
BIOLOGY. The breeding habitat of castrensis is not known. In the type
locality in India, the types were collected in association with the specimens
of C. malayi (Edwards 1922).
10. Culex (Eumelanomyia) cataractarum Edwards
(Fig. 6B, ¢ terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) cataractarum Edwards 1923, Bull. ent. Res. 14:7
3, 2); Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc. 194: 195
taxonomy). _
Culex (Mochthogenes) tricontus Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 133 (o*, 2). NEW SYNONYMY.
Culex (Eumelanomyia) catavactarum, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Very small or minute, dark brown to black species, wing length
about 2.1 mm. In general very similar to hinglungensis, differing from it in
the following features. Thorax. Upper corner of sip with a few pale translu-
cent scales; lower mep bristle absent. Wing. Plume scales on all veins finer.
MALE. Differing from hinglungensis as described for female and as in
the following. Head. Palpus shorter, about 0. 12 of proboscis length; proboscis
with 2-4 labial basal setae which are nearly 1.5 times as long as palpus; flagel-
lomeres 1-11 of antenna without minute setae in addition to normal and minor
whorls of longer hairs. Terminalia (Fig. 6B). Tergal lobe of segment IX very
poorly developed, bearing 2-3 tiny setae; basimere larger and longer, about
0.15 mm in length, lateral tergal surface with fewer and weaker bristles;
subapical lobe smaller, proximal division with 3 rather longer, rodlike setae,
distal division with 1 tiny and 1 strong hairlike seta; distimere sickel-shaped,
more slender and longer, about 0.75 of the length of basimere, apical half
tapered into a recurved truncate apex, ventral subapical seta present, sub-
apical claw narrow and rather long; phallosome oval shaped, lateral plate
slightly tapered into a broad blunt or rounded apex, denticles absent or only a
few present, proctiger crown with 4-5 fine spinelike spicules; cercal setae 2-3
in number. |
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. (1) Culex (M.)cataractarum Edwards 1923, Lectotype: male,
marked as type by Edwards, with attached terminalia mount, on rocks near ,
water fall, Rabaul, New Britain, BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO, 1922, G. F. Hill
(BM); PRESENT SELECTION. (2) Culex (M) tricontus Delfinado 1966, holo-
type: male, Malawin Creek, College, Laguna, Luzon, PHILIPPINES, 18
January 1935, F. E. Baisas (USNM). ;
DISTRIBUTION. Presumably widely spread, but at present, cataractarum
has been recorded only from the Philippines and New Britain, Bismarck
Archipelago. Material examined: 5¢ and 12. PHILIPPINES, Luzon, 1¢.
BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO, New Britain, Rabaul (type locality), 4c, 19.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 35
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. cataractarum was described from 4 males
and 1 female from Rabaul, New Britain, Bismarck Archipelago, but no illus-
tration was provided. The male characters agree very well with the original
description by Edwards (1923). The above synonymy of tvicontus Delfinado
(1966) from the Philippines with catavactarum is based on the similarity in
several features of the male terminalia and other conspicuous external char-
acters. The Philippine male differs from the typical form in being paler and
in having a few weak denticles on the lateral plate of the phallosome, but these
differences are not sufficiently distinct to warrant its recognition as a separate
species. On the basis of the present records, it appears most likely that
cataractarum is widely distributed on the chain of islands which connect the
Philippines, New Guinea and the Bismarck Archipelago.
C. catavactarum is closely similar to hinglungensis from which it is
distinguished in the male by (1) absence of lower mesepimeral bristle; (2)
larger and longer basimere and distimere and (3) setae of the subapical lobe
and (4) shape of the phallosome as described and illustrated.
BIOLOGY. The specimens in the type series of this species were collected
among rocks near a water fall indicating that it is probably a ground pool
breeder. The single male from the Philippines was reported to have been col-
lected from a creek, presumably by sweeping with net over vegetation. The
biology of adults is unknown. .
11. Culex (Eumelanomyia) baisasi n. sp.
(Fig. 6C, o terminalia)
FEMALE. Unknown.
MALE. In general very similar to other members of the hinglungensis sub-
group in small size and weakly plumose antennal flagellar whorls, differing in
the combination of following features. Head. Decumbent scales in center of
vertex narrow, broad decumbent scales restricted to eye margin, forming a
very narrow pale ocular line; erect scales predominantly dark centrally, pale
yellowish posterolaterally; palpus very thin and short, about 0. 15 of proboscis;
4-6 labial basal setae present, longest ones as long as palpus; flagellar whorls
of antenna apparently more weakly plumose, normal whorls with 7-9 hairs,
minor whorls with 4-5 hairs. Thorax. One lower mef bristle present. Legs.
Anterior surface of hind femur with pale stripe from base to near apex.
Terminalia (Fig. 6C). Tergal lobe of segment IX very poorly developed, 2-3
tiny setae present, rather inconspicuous; subapical lobe most distinctive,
proximal division with 3 subequal rodlike setae which are rather short, all
with truncate apices, distal division with a strong basal seta laterally anda
mesal group of 5 broad lanceolate setae, 3 of which are serrated along sub-
apical margin; distimere typically sickle-shaped, ventral subapical seta rather
strong, subapical claw relatively small and short; lateral plate of phallosome
tapered to a blunt apex, denticles present, strong, 12 in number, arranged in
two close rows on upper tergal surface; proctiger crown with 4-5 coarse and
6-7 fine spine-like spicules, 2 cercal setae present.
PUPA. In general as figured for foliatus (Fig. 5A) to which it is very
similar in size, pigmentation and in features of trumpet, differing apparently
in the following. Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C 3-4b. Abdomen.
Hairs 1-III-V 5, 4 and 2b respectively; 5-IV single; 6-III-V all single.
LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (C1 103-2) with associated pupal skin and
terminalia slide, axil of Colocasia sp., Kolambugan, Lanao, Mindanao,
PHILIPPINES, 10 December 1965, M. Santiago (USNM); 1 paratype male
(791. 50) with terminalia and antenna slide, rockhole above stream level,
Osmena, Samar, PHILIPPINES, 19 July 1945, Johnson, Knight and Laffoon
(USNM). This species is named after Dr. F. E. Baisas in recognition of his
contribution to the knowledge of the Philippine mosquitoes.
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from Mindanao and Samar in the Philippines.
Material examined: 2c as indicated in the type data.
36 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. baisasi apparently falls into the hinglungen-
sis subgroup on the basis of the shape of the distimere and details of the sub-
apical lobe of the basimere of the male terminalia. The lateral plate of the
phallosome and the texture of the decumbent scales on the vertex of baisasi
are, however, rather similar to the foliatus subgroup. As in C. castrensis,
this species is also somewhat intermediate between the 2 mentioned subgroups,
suggesting that it is probably of hybrid origin between the 2 subgroups. It is
distinguished in the male as indicated in the key and in the above diagnosis.
The pupa is described from a single specimen associated with the male type
and can be readily recognized from other known forms by the key characters
and by the above description. .
BIOLOGY. The specimens of baisasi were reported to have been collected
from 2 different types of habitats, once from leaf axil of Colocasia and once
from a rockhole. The biology of the adults is unknown. 7
malayi subgroup
FEMALE. Small species, wing length between 2.3-2.7 mm. Head, Anteri-
or dorsal margin and central part of vertex clothed with broad decumbent
scales; narrow scales restricted to occiput; palpus varies from 0. 1-0. 2 of the
length of proboscis; labial basal setae as long as palpus. Thorax. Acrostichal
bristles very well developed; 1 lower mep bristle present. Abdomen. Terga
usually entirely dark, rarely with narrow pale basal or apical bands; sterna as
dark as or slightly paler than terga.
MALE. In general similar to female except for the following. Head. Pal- —
pus about 0.2 of proboscis length; normal flagellar whorls strongly and densely
plumose, number of hairs varies from 30-40; proboscis usually with a false
joint marked by a weak flexion just beyond the middle. Terminalia Tergal
lobe of segment IX poorly developed, 2-3 tiny setae present; basimere with
or without a linear row of 6-7 strong, flattened submarginal setae on inner
tergal surface; subapical lobe clearly divided into proximal and distal divisions;
leaflet of distal division present, shape varied; distimere furcates at the mid-
dle into two arms; lateral plate of phallosome distally narrowed, terminating in
a blunt apex, several denticles present; proctiger crown moderate in size with
a few coarse and several fine spicules.
PUPA. Abdomen 1.7-2.2 mm. Paddle 0.5-0.52 mm. Trumpet 0. 38-0. 52
mm, Index 8-9. In general as described for the group, with the following char-
acteristic hairs. Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C usually 4b, rarely
triple; 9-C double; 10-C 4-6b. Abdomen. Hair 5-IV 3-6b; hairs 5-V, VI double;
6-III-VI 4-6b. 7 : |
LARVA. Head 0.6-0.65 mm. Siphon 0.85-0.9 mm, index 7-10, siphon/
saddle ratio 3-4. In general conforms to the description of the group, the
following characters are diagnostic. Head, Hair 5-C 0.25-0.5 of the length of
hair 6-C. Thorax, Hair 4-P as long as 3-P, triple or 4b. Abdomen. Seg-
ment VIII with some enlarged comb scales mixed with several small, apically.
fringed scales; siphon usually with dark median ring, sometimes absent and
entirely pale.
DISCUSSION. The malayi subgroup includes 3 very closely related species:
malayi (Leicester 1908), laureli Baisas 1935 and yeageri Baisas 1935. They
are extremely similar in all stages and are recognized primarily by the differ-
ences in the shape of the leaflet of the subapical lobe. This subgroup is strong-
ly differentiated from the other subgroups by the furcation of distimere of the
male terminalia, the branching of metanotal hair 10-C in the pupa, the magni-
tude of hair 4-P and the presence of some enlarged comb scales in the larva.
In the general characters of the adults, the members of this subgroup overlap
with members of the pluvialis subgroup, particularly in the broad decumbent
scales of the vertex and in the strong plumosity of male antennal flagellar
whorls. The male terminalia also show some resemblance in the phallosome
and in the subapical lobe to those of the ¢luvialis subgroup to which they are
probably related.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 37
All members of the malayi subgroup are ground pool breeders. C. malayi
and laureli are rather common in the areas in which they occur and have been
frequently found in large number in a given collection. The subgroup is very
widely spread within Southeast Asia and adjacent areas and appears to extend
its range towards the East as far as New Guinea, and to the North in the south-
ern part of mainland China. Within Southeast Asia, it has been reported from
every country except the Ryukyu Islands.
12. Culex (Eumelanomyia) malayi (Leicester)
(Figs. 7A, o terminalia; 7B, ? cibarial armature;
8A, pupa; 8B, larva)
Aedes malayi Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 184 (¢, 9).
Aedes nigrescens Theobald 1907, Mon. Cul. 4: 540 (¢,¢?). Preoccupied by
Danielsia nigrescens Theobald 1907 (Edwards 1922b).
Aioretomyia aedes Leicester 1908, Cul. Malaya 3: 189 ().
Culex (Micraedes) malayi, Edwards 1917, Bull. ent. Res. 7: 228 (taxonomy);
1922a, Bull. ent. Res. 13: 92 (c).
Culex malayi, Barraud 1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1282 (°); Barraud
and Covell 1928, Indian J. med. Res. 15: 671 (2 buccopharyngeal arma-
ture); Borel 1926, Arch. Inst. Pasteur Indo-Chine 3-4: 43 (o*, 9, L*);
Borel 1930, Mon. Coll. Soc. Path. exot. 3: 368 («*, 9, L*).
Culex (Mochthogenes) malayi, Edwards 1930, Bull. ent. Res. 21: 305 (taxono-
my); 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect., fasc. 194: 195 (taxonomy);
Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5: 358 («*, ¢, L); Li and Wu
1935, Yearbook Bur. Ent. Chekiang 4: 98 (L*); Brug 1939, Tijdschr.
Ent. 82: 111 (L*); Lee 1944, Atlas Mosq. Larvae, Australasian Region
:90 (L*); Carter and Wijesundara 1948, Ceylon J. Sci. (B) 23: 143
(distribution); Galliard and Ngu 1949, Ann. Parasit. 24: 502 (o*, L*);
Bonne-Wepster 1954, Roy. trop. Inst. Amst. Spec. Pub. 111: 111
(o*, 2, L*); Hsieh and Liao 1956, Acta ent. Sinica 6: 376 (L*); Lien 1962,
Pacif. Insec. 4: 631 (distribution); Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 2: 39 (o'*, 9, L*),
Culex (Eumelanomyia) malayi, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.4 mm, fore femur 1.2 mm, proboscis 1.4 mm, abdo-
men 1,4-1.7 mm. In general small, dark to black species. Head. Vertex
clothed with broad decumbent scales which are whitish or grayish on ocular
line and predominantly dark or black posteriorly; narrow decumbent scales
restricted to occiput; erect scales slender and entirely dark; palpus 0. 1 to 0.2
of proboscis length, apparently 3-segmented; proboscis with 4 dark labial basal
setae, the longest ones as long as palpus. Cibarial armature (Fig. 7B). As
figured; very distinctive; cibarial bar with 60-70 teeth, middle one narrow and
fine, lateral ones coarser. Thorax. Scutum, scutellum and pronotum brown,
reared specimens dark greenish; scutal scales moderately dense, as dark as
integument; acrostichal bristles well developed; dorsocentrals very strong and
dark; pleuron usually with striking pattern of dark and lighter areas; scales
practically absent; 1 anterior lower mep bristle present. Legs. Coxae very
pale; anterior surface of hind femur with a pale stripe along the whole length;
tibiae and tarsi very dark to black scaled; pulvilli very well developed. Wing.
Plume scales narrow, very dark and moderately dense on all veins; halter knob
dark scaled, stem pale and bare. Abdomen. Terga usually entirely dark to
black scaled, sometimes with basolateral pale spots or basal pale bands on
terga II-VII.
MALE. Essentially as described for the female except for the following.
Head, Broad decumbent scales on vertex predominantly pale, forming a distinct
ocular line anteriorly; erect scales yellowish brown to dark brown; palpus
usually 0.2 of proboscis length; proboscis with false joint which is marked by
a slight flexion at 0. 6-0. 7 of the length from base; labial basal setae weaker,
38 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
all subequal; flagellar whorls of antenna densely long plumose; normal whorls
with 35-40 long hairs; minor whorls with 5-8 short hairs. Wing. Scales ?
scantier than in female. Terminalia (Fig. 7A). Segment IX with small tergal
lobes which bear 2-3 weak and short setae each; sternum IX thin and broad,
without any setae or scales; basimere roughly oval or conical, with several
strong setae laterally, inner tergal surface with a striking row of 6-7 strong,
flattened and striated submarginal setae, all subequal in length and acuminate
at tips; subapical lobe mesal in position, proximal and distal divisions clearly
separated; proximal division with 3 slender subequal rods, 1 with hooked apex,
the other 2 tapered to a point apically; distal division with lateral group of 1
strong basal seta and 1 very large spatulate leaflet and a mesal group of 1 fine
hair-like seta and 2 narrow blade-like setae one of which is fringed with a few
spicules subapically; distimere strongly modified, distal half divided into a
dorsal arm which bears 1 tiny subapical seta and a longer ventral arm which
bears a slender subapical claw; phallosome oval-shaped, lateral plate tapered
to a blunt point distally, 6-7 denticles present, poorly or well developed, all
restricted to upper tergal surface; proctiger crown medium sized, with a few
coarse and several fine and pointed spicules; paraproct with a small apical
lobe, basal sternal process absent; 1 or 2 cercal setae present. 3
PUPA (Fig. 8A). Abdomen 1.7-2.0 mm, paddle 0.5 mm, trumpet 0. 38-
0.47 mm, index 8-9. In general, very pale yellowish or cream colored ex-
cept for cases of leg, wing, antenna, proboscis and palpus which are darkened.
Trumpet dark, moderately long and uniformly cylindrical, pinna with slit ex-
tending to meatus; chaetotaxy as figured, the following are diagnostic. Cethalo-
thorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C usually 4b(3-4); 9-C single; 10-C 4 or 5b,
sometimes more; 11-C double. Abdomen. Hair 5-IV usually 4b(3-5); 5-V, VI.
double; 6-III-VI usually 4-5b(3-7); minute hair 2-VII usually laterad of 1-VII,
sometimes mesad to the latter; 9-VII usually triple (2-3); 4-VIII usually triple
(3-4); 9-VIII usually 5 or 6b(4-6), pectinate. Paddle. Midrib weak; apical
hairs 1, 2-P present. : | orem
LARVA (Fig. 8B). Head 0.6 mm, siphon 0.85-0.9 mm, index 7, saddle
0.3 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 3-4. As figured, in general similar to foliatus,
differing particularly in the following features. Head, Anterior part of ocular
bulge with a striking white band contrasting sharply with other darkened areas
of head capsule; hair 5-C usually double, sometimes triple; 6-C double, about
twice as long as 5-C; 7-C strongly plumose, 8-10b; 13-C 3 or 4b. Thorax.
Hair 4-P as long as 3-P, or sometimes longer, 3-4b; 7-P double; 8-P single.
Abdomen. Hairs 1-II-VI 5-6b; 1-VII 9-10b; comb scales strongly differentiated,
18-23 in number, anterior scale small with apical fringe of fine spicules, pos-
terior scales larger and longer, terminating in a median stout spine-like spi-
cule and with a lateral fringe of fine spicules. Siphon. Rather thicker, median
dark band usually absent, sometimes present; siphonal tufts always 6 pairs
(total 12) in number, each 6-8b. Anal segment. Ventral brush consists of 6
pairs of hairs, 1 or 2 of which are detached from grid; anal gills slender and |
as long as saddle. 7 ,
TYPE DATA. (1) Aedes malayi Leicester, lectotype: male with slide of
terminalia, pools, Circular Road, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, West Malaysia,
MALAYSIA, October 1903, G. F. Leicester (BM); SELECTION OF BRAM
(1967: 42). (2) Aedes nigrescens Theobald, holotype: male with attached ter-
minalia mount, Castle Rock, Bombay, INDIA (BM). (3) Aioretomyia aedes
Leicester, holotype: male with attached terminalia mount, Kuala Lumpur,
Selangor, West Malaysia, MALAYSIA, G. F. Leicester (BM). |
DISTRIBUTION. Widely spread in Southeast Asia except in the Philippines.
~The records from Halmaheira, New Guinea and other areas in the eastern part
of Indonesia by Brug and Bonne-Wepster (1947) are doubtful as they could refer
to laureli which is dominant and widely spread in the Philippines. In addition
to the distribution data below, the records from Ceylon, Nepal, Maldive Islands
and Andaman Islands as noted by Stone, Knight and Starcke (1959) and Bram
(1967) are probably valid. Material examined: 2250, 2289, 25P, 8L, 393 with
associated skins (233p, 60lp).
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 39
INDIA. Bombay: N. Kanara, Kawar, 30,29. Bengal: Calcutta, 1c.
Bihar: Janapar, 1c 49. : 7 ae
CEYLON. Ratnapura, Uggalkaltota; Vavuniya, Parayanalankulam;
Anuradhapura, Hunuwilagama; 1c’, 29.
CHINA. Shanghai, 5%, 159. Kiangsi, 1c.
HONG KONG. 1c, 19. 3
THAILAND. Chiang Mai: Chang Phuck; Ban Chang Khien; Chiang Dao;
Doi Saket; 20c, 72, 10 p. Lampang: Ngao; Ban Pha Daeng; Ban Rong; Ban
Bang Pako; Ban Rong Na; Ban Huey Khien; 45c, 459, 2 P, 52 p, 12 lp. Nan:
Ban Sala; Ban Pang Mon; Ban Fang Minh; Ban Phuang Chom Phu; Pha Daeng
Khawi; 170, 239, 15 P, 35 p, 2 lp. Khon Kaen: Phu Wiang, ic, 1p.
Nakhon Ratchasima: Khlong Phai; Ban Kae Chae; Ban Salatdi; 49, 4 p.
Prachin Buri: Ban Thap Lan; Ban Bu Phram; 12c, 159, 2p, 7lp. Phet Buri:
Tha Yang; Gang Ga Jarn; Wat Sammarong; 13c, 5 L, 1lp. Chon Buri: Bang
La Mung, Khao Mai Keaow; Siracha, Bang Phra; Ban Laem Sing; 3c’, 29,, 2 p,
llp. Pvachuap Khiri Khan: Khlong Huai Sai; Khlong Hin Chaung; 12, 99, 21 p.
Ranong: Khlong Set Takuat; Khao Hin Chang; 120, 39, 14 p, llp. Krabi:
Ban Mai Kaen Tai; Khlong Thom; Khao Aopong; Ban Sai Thai; 270, 279, 32 p,
12 1p. Phangnga: Khao Pak Chaung; Pathum; Nam Tai; 1<, 59, 4 p, 1 Ip.
Phuket: Ban Khian, 19, 1p. Surat Thani: Koh Samui, Bang Makham, 19, 1 lp.
Nakhon Si Thammarat: Chaung Khao, 2c, 192, 3p. Songhkla: Boripat Water
Fall, 1 P, 1 L. Satun: Khuan Ga Long, 24, 499, 7 P, 2 L, 46 p, 18 lp.
S. VIETNAM. Gia Dinh; Con Son; Long Khanh; 5¢, 49.
MALAYSIA. West Malaysia: Kelantan, Gua Musang, 7c, 792, 3p, 2 Ip.
Perak, Kg. Jalong, 1, 19. Kedah, Sintok Forest Reserve, 3c, 392, 3p, 2 lp.
East Malaysia: Sabah, Kudat; Tombolugu Tuaran; Keningau;:3", _
INDONESIA. Sumatra: Mandailing; Maeora Tebo; 4c’,
Additional records from the literature: INDIA, Assam; ANDAMAN
ISLANDS (Barraud 1934); CHINA, Hainan Island (Chu 1958); TAIWAN (Lien
1962); INDONESIA, Java, Celebes, Kabaena, Sangir Island, Halmaheira,
West Irian, Sumbar and Timor (Brug and Bonne-Wepster 1947; Bonne-
Wepster 1954).
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. malayi is one of the most common species
of Eumelanomyia in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas except in the Philippines
where it appears to be completely replaced by the other 2 closely similar
species: laureli and yeagevi. The adults can be identified in general by the
broad dusky decumbent scales on the vertex and in the male by the densely
long plumose antennal flagellum and the presence of a clearly marked false
joint just distad of the middle of the proboscis. The male terminalia are
characterized by the furcation of the distimere, the presence of strong, flat-
tened submarginal setae on the inner tergal surface of basimere and the shape
of the leaflet of the subapical lobe. The pupa is distinguished by hair 8-C which
is 3-4 branched and hair 10-C which is 4-5 branched. The larva is recognized
by the presence of some enlarged comb scales and by the magnitude and branch-
ing of hair 4-P as indicated in the key and in the above diagnosis.
Except for the male terminalia and other diagnostic features, malayi adults
show a great deal of variation in size, coloration, texture of scutal scales and
in the presence or absence of basal pale bands or basolateral pale spots on the
abdominal terga. The female cibarial armature is variable in the number and
length of teeth. The specimens from China differ conspicuously from the typi-
cal form in the south, e.g. Malaya and Thailand, in being larger (wing length
3.0 mm or more), paler coloration, having coarser scutal scales, presence
of basal pale bands on abdominal terga II-VII and in the presence of fewer and
shorter cibarial teeth, However, since these differences are not correlated
with any differentiation in the male terminalia, they are considered as con-
specific.
C. malayi can be readily separated frora laureli and yeagevi from the
Philippines by details of the male terminalia as indicated in the key as as
. described above. The topotypic female of malayi is also strikingly different
from the other 2 species in the presence of more numerous cibarial teeth.
— 40 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
The pupa and larva are extremely similar to those of laureli and yeageri ex-
cept for certain hair branchings as given in the keys.
BIOLOGY. C. malayi is a common forest species and has been reported
to utilize ground pools as the principal breeding habitat. In Thailand, the
immature stages have been found mainly in pools near stream margins under
heavy shade of the forest (Bram 1967: 42). The present records also include
rock pools, ponds, ditches and crab holes. They were frequently collected in
association with specimens of Lophoceraomyia and on occasion also with those
of foliatus. Adult biology is not known and it appears that malayi is of no direct
medical importance to man. |
13. Culex (Eumelanomyia) laureli Baisas
(Figs. 7C, ¢ terminalia; 7D, ? cibarial armature)
Culex (Mochthogenes) laureli Baisas 1935, Philipp. J. Sci. 57: 176 (o*);
Synonymy with Culex (M.) malayi by Bohart 1945, U. S. Navmed 580: 73;
resurrected from synonymy by Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst.
tise (ot, 2, PL). 7
Culex (Eumelanomyia) laureli, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.7mm, fore femur 1.2 mm, proboscis 1.5 mm abdomen
1.9mm. In general extremely similar to malayi, differing slightly as in the
following. Head. Anterior midline of vertex with more numerous narrow de-
cumbent scales; broad decumbent scales confined to eye border and to postero-
lateral area. Cibarial armature (Fig. 7D). Differs from malayi in having
fewer teeth, about 40 in number, all teeth apparently coarser.
MALE. In general as in female, differing from malayi chiefly in the follow-
ing features of terminalia. Terminalia (Fig. 7C). Inner tergal surface of
basimere without strong submarginal setae, only very short and weak setae
present; distal division of subapical lobe with an asymmetrical leaflet which is
broad, somewhat bulbous in basal 0.25, distal 0.75 narrow, rodlike, gradually
tapered into a point apically; dorsal arm of distimere with 1 or 2 ventral setae;
lateral plate of phallosome with stronger teeth, extending towards lateral mar-
gins. |
PUPA. Abdomen 2.0-2.2 mm, paddle 0.52 mm, trumpet 0.46 mm, index
7-10. As figured for C. malayi (Fig. 8A) to which it is very similar, differing
in chaetotaxy as follows: Cephalothorax. Hair 8-C usually triple (3-4).
Abdomen. Hair 5-IV 5 or 6b, rarely 4b; 6-IDI-VI 5 or 6b; 4-VIII double.
LARVA. Head 0.65 mm, siphon 0.85 mm, index 5-6, saddle 0.26 mm,
siphon/saddle ratio 3-4. Essentially as described and figured for C. malayi
(Fig. 8B), differing slightly in the presence of more striking pattern of dark
and light areas on head capsule and in the presence of a median dark band on
the siphon.
TYPE DATA. Type: male (Lot R38-xx), Malaybalay, Bukidnon, Mindanao,
PHILIPPINES, 4 April 1934, F. E. Baisas (formerly in the collection of the
Bureau of Health, Manila, Luzon, Philippines). Upon our recent inquiry to
Dr. Gemma Cruz Araneta, Director of National Museum and Dr. F. E. Baisas,
in Manila, Philippines, we were informed that the type of this species was lost,
probably before 1945.
DISTRIBUTION. Widely spread among the major islands in the Philippines.
Material examined: 480,149, 12 P, 15 L; 14 with associated lp skins.
PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Subic Naval Base; San Pablo City; 3c, 19, 2 lp.
Mindoro: San Jose, 16c, 62, 4 P, 5 L. Samar: San Antonio; Osmena;
Guirang; Sohoton; 8, 69, 8 P, IL L, 12 lp. Leyte: Lago Lago Baybay;
Tacloban; 9°. Palawan: Puerto Princesa; Iwahig; Batangas; 10¢,19, 1P, 2
L. Mindanao: Lanao, Dansalan; Zamboanga, Mercedes; Quinipot; 8c",
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. laureli is one of the most common forms
of Eumelanomyia in the Philippines where it has been found to be widely dis-
tributed among several major islands. It is quite possible that it may also
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 41
qaccur on the islands in eastern Indonesia. The records by Bonne-Wepster
(1954) from the Celebes, Halmaheira and other islands towards New Guinea
as malayiis rather doubtful as it may well be laureli.
C. laureli is extremely closely related to malayi from which it can be
separated with certainty only in the male terminalia and female cibarial arma-
ture as indicated in the keys and as in the above description. There is appar-
ently no overlap in the diagnostic features of the male terminalia between
laureli and malayi, but there is a great deal of overlap in general and in the
chaetotaxy of the pupa and larva. The lawreli pupa can be separated from that
of malayi by the branching of a few hairs as indicated above, but the larvae are
_ virtually inseparable. It is probable that laureli has become differentiated
from malayi through geographic isolation. — |
BIOLOGY. As in malayi, laureli also utilized ground pools as a breeding
habitat. The larvae and pupae were collected in numbers from pools in the
vicinity of streams, springs or creeks. Nothing is known about adult biology.
14. Culex (Eumelanomyia) yeageri Baisas
(Figs. 9A, * terminalia; 9B, ? cibarial armature)
Culex (Mochthogenes) yeageri Baisas 1935, Philipp. J. Sci. 57: 175 (o*);
Bohart 1945, U. S. Navmed 580: 74; Delfinado 1966, Mem. Amer... Ent.
Inst. 7: 134 (o*),
Culex (Eumelanomyia) yeageri, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.3mm. Extremely similar to malayi and laureli, dif-
fering slightly in smaller size and in the following: Head. Erect scales on
vertex and occiput finer; labial basal setae of proboscis shorter than palpus.
Cibarial armature (Fig. 9B). Very similar to laureli, differing in having
fewer teeth which are about 30 in number. Abdomen. Terga entirely dark
scaled, basolateral spots or basal bands absent. |
MALE. Essentially similar to the female except for the presence of nar-
row apical pale bands on abdominal terga II-VII. Terminalia (Fig. 9A). Very
similar to malayi and laureli, differing only in the following: inner tergal sur-
face of basimere with a row of 4-5 strong submarginal setae which are not
flattened or striated; subapical lobe with 3-5 long, weak hairs adjacent to
bases of proximal rodlike setae, distal division with a symmetrical leaflet
which is broad, oblong and acuminate at tip, and 2 simple accessory setae
one of which is blade-like and the other one hair-like; distimere and phallo-
some as in laurel.
PUPA. Abdomen 2.0 mm, paddle 0.52 mm, trumpet 0.52 mm. As figured
and as described for malayi (Fig. 8A) and laureli; extremely similar to laureli,
differing particularly in having abdominal hairs 1-V-VII usually 10(9-10), 5,
4b respectively (usually 6(5-7), 4(3-4) and 2, 3b in laureii. )
LARVA. Head 0.62 mm, siphon 0.85 mm, index 5-6, saddle 0.26 mm,
siphon/saddle ratio about 3.3. As figured for malayi (Fig. 8B) and as des-
cribed for the latter and laureli, apparently indistinguishable from both forms
by any feature of chaetotaxy; color of head capsule and siphon as in laureli.
TYPE DATA. Type: male (Lot R66-xyz), Iwahig, Palawan, PHILIPPINES,
7 June 1934, F. E. Baisas (in the collection of the Bureau of Health, Manila,
Luzon, Philippines). We were informed by Dr. Gemma Cruz Araneta, Direc-
tor of National Museum and Dr. F. E. Baisas, in Manila, Philippines, that the
type and other cotypes of this species were lost, probably before 1945.
DISTRIBUTION. Presumably restricted only to Palawan in the Philippines.
Material examined: 120, 29, 2 P, 4 L; 3 with associated lp skins.
PHILIPPINES. Palawan: Iwahig; Bacungan; Quezon, Panitan; 12, 29,
2P, 41L, 3 Ip.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. yeageri is known only from Palawan in the
Philippines where it was found to occur sympatrically with laureli. It appears
to be rather rare and is probably endemic to this island. It is very closely
42 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
similar to malayi and laureli from which it differs, however, in the shape of
the external leaflet, presence of 3-4 long and fine hairs in the subapical lobe
and in the presence of the strong submarginal setae on the inner tergal sur-
face of the basimere of the male terminalia. I have seen only 2 males of
yeageri which are also quite distinct from malayi and laureli in the presence
of pale apical bands on abdominal terga II-VI. However, as this feature is
not shown in the female and because of the limited amount of the male materi-
al, it is not possible here to evaluate its diagnostic importance. The female
cibarial armature of yeageri has fewer teeth than that of lawreli; the pupa can
be separated by the presence of more branches in the abdominal hairs 1-V-VII
but the larva is virtually indistinguishable from the latter or malayi. As in
mda this species is probably derived from malayi through geographical
isolation.
BIOLOGY. The breeding site of yeageri includes ground pools and rock
pools in the vicinity of streams or other small water sources under heavy shade
of tropical forest. At present, nothing is known about adult biology.
Lluvialis subgroup
FEMALE. Medium sized species, wing length 3.0-3.9mm. Head, An-
terior dorsal margin of vertex with broad decumbent scales, scales in center
of vertex broad or narrow; palpus about 0.15 of proboscis length. Thorax.
Acrostichal bristles very well developed; lower mep bristle present. Abdo-
men. Terga entirely dark scaled; sterna paler scaled.
MALE. In general as in female. Head. Palpus about 0.2 of proboscis
length; labial basal setae about 0.5 of palpal length; proboscis without appar-
ent false joint; flagellar whorls densely plumose, normal whorls with 30-35
long hairs. Tervminalia. Tergal lobe of segment IX with 5-10 moderately
strong setae; basimere slender, more or less conical, inner tergal surface
with a linear row of 4-7 strong submarginal setae, its apex with 1-7 setae
sternally; subapical lobe clearly separated into proximal and distal divisions,
proximal division with 3 subequal rods, distal division with 1 strong basal
seta and 1 very broad leaflet laterally, 2 hair-like setae and 2 long and broad
blades mesally; distimere slender, sickle-shaped; subapical claw short and
slender; lateral plate of phallosome tapered to a blunt or pointed apex, denti-
cles numerous, size varied; proctiger crown medium sized, witha few coarse
and several fine pointed spicules.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
DISCUSSION. The pluvialis subgroup as recognized here includes 3 closely
allied species: pluvialis Barraud 1924a, campilunati Carter and Wijesundara
1948 and selai Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969. In the previous scheme
(Sirivanakarn 1971), these 3 species were placed in the tenuipaltis subgroup,
but because of the distinctive male and general adult characters, Iam now
recognizing them as a separate subgroup. It is distinguished from the tenuz-
talpis subgroup by the predominantly broad decumbent scales on the ocular
line of vertex (entirely narrow in tenuipalpis), details of the subapical lobe of
the basimere and by the shape of lateral plate of the phallosome. On the basis
of comparative adult morphology, the pluvialis subgroup appears to be more
closely related to the malayi subgroup than to other subgroups of mochthogenes.
At present, this subgroup is known only from India, Ceylon, Cambodia and
Borneo (East Malaysia).
15. Culex (Eumelanomyia) pluvialis Barraud
(Fig. 9C, & terminalia)
Culex pluvialis Barraud 1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1281 (¢*, 9).
Culex (Mochthogenes) pluvialis, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect.
fasc. ie ne (taxonomy): Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera
5F: 356 doy 2). :
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 43
Culex (Eumelanomyia) pluvialis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. No specimens were available for study. The following mea-
surements are quoted from Barraud (1934: 356). Wing 3.0 mm, palpus 0.21
mm, proboscis 1.3 mm.
MALE. Head. Vertex.with broad ovate decumbent scales which are entire-
ly pale to almost white, forming distinct ocular line; decumbent scales in
center narrow, yellowish brown; erect scales entirely pale; antennal flagellar
whorls densely long plumose, normal whorls with 30 or more hairs. Thorax.
Scutal integument brown; scales narrow and entirely dark brown; pleuron
darkened on ppl, psp, ssp, upper stip and mep, pale below. Legs. Anterior
surface of hind femur with pale stripe from base to near apex. Wing. Scales
narrow, rather minute and scanty. Abdomen. Terga dark, sterna pale yellow-
ish. Terminalia (Fig. 9C). As figured; segment IX with small tergal lobe
bearing 5-7 setae; apex of basimere with 1 or 2 setae on sternal surface,
inner tergal surface with 4-5 strong submarginal setae in row parallel to ter-
gomesal margin; proximal and distal divisions of subapical lobe clearly divided,
proximal division with 3 stout and gently curved rods; distal division with 1
strong basal seta and 1 broad acuminate leaflet laterally and a mesal group of
2-3 strong hair-like setae and 2 broad, club-shaped blades or leaflets; disti-
mere slender, sickle-shaped, basal half uniformly thick, apical half narrow,
tapered to a slightly recurved, truncate apex, subapical claw slender and
short; ventral subapical seta rather strong, placed slightly beyond middle of
curvature, dorsal subapical seta absent; lateral plate of phallosome broad in
middle, tapered into a blunt point apically, denticles numerous; proctiger
crown with a few coarse and several fine spine-like spicules; cercal setae
tiny, 1 or 2 in number.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male, Kadra, North Kanara, Bombay, INDIA,
reared from larva collected from a small rock pool in heavy jungle, September —
1921, P. J. Barraud (BM). PRESENT SELECTION.
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality in India. Material
examined: 30’, as indicated in the type data. -
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. I have examined 3 males in the type series of
this species and found them agreeing well with the description and figure by
Barraud (1924a, 1934). C. pluvialis shows similarity to malayi in general ex-
ternal characters, but is distinct from the latter in having an unmodified ©
sickle-shaped distimere and in other details of the male terminalia. It is very
similar to campilunati Carter and Wijesundara (1948) from Ceylon and to selai
Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969) from Cambodia but differs from both slightly in
certain features of the male terminalia as indicated in the key and in the above
diagnosis.
BIOLOGY. According to Barraud (1924a: 1281-1282), the adult specimens
of ¢luvialis were reared from larvae collected in a rock pool in heavy jungle
in association with the specimen of C. malayi. The biology of the adults is
unknown. :
16. Culex (Eumelanomyia) campilunati Carter and Wijesundara
(Fig. 9D, & terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) campilunati Carter and Wijesundara 1948, Ceylon J.
Sci., 23: 143 (o%, 2).
Culex (Eumelanomyia) campilunati, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. No specimen is available for this study, the following descrip-
tion is quoted from Carter and Wijesundara (1948: 143). "Head: vertex mainly
covered with golden narrow curved and dark brown upright scales, but with
some white and dark flat scales laterally, the former extending narrowly some
44 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
distance along eye margins. Proboscis, clypeus and palpi dark brown, the
latter very short about 1/7th the length of the proboscis. Bucco-pharyngeal
armature consisting of a row of numerous slender teeth, those in the centre
longer than the others. Thorax: mesonotum pale brown or grayish-brown
covered with curved golden-brown scales and with brown bristles, those on
the posterior portion and over the wing roots being longer and darker; scutel-
lum brown with golden-brown narrow scales, and long dark marginal bristles;
pleura pale brown, darker on the upper part of sternopleura and post-and sub-
spiracular areas, one lower mesepimeral bristle present. Legs dark brown,
unbanded, the middle and hind femora paler beneath. Wings dark, the plume
scales on the upper and lower forks long and rather dense; length 3. 5-3. 9 mm.
Abdomen with the tergites and sternites dark brown, unbanded, the hairs
golden-brown. "' |
MALE. Based only on the single terminalia slide (marked as cotype).
Terminalia (Fig. 9D). As figured, extremely similar to fluvialis, differing
particularly in the following features: apex of basimere with a dense group of
6-7 setae on sternal surface, its inner tergal surface with more numerous
short hairs extending to the level of subapical lobe; distal division of subapical
lobe with broader leaflet and stronger accessory setae; lateral plate of phal-
losome with more numerous and finer denticles; proctiger crown with coarser
spicules; 3 cercal setae present.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male (slide of terminalia only), marked as
cotype, reared from a mixed batch of larvae collected from pools and pits
among undergrowth, Moon Plains, Nuwara Eliya, 6000 ft, CEYLON, November
1937, J. L..N. Fernando.(BM). PRESENT SELECTION.
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality in Ceylon. Material
examined: 1c terminalia slide, as indicated in the type data.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. campilunati is very close to pluvialis in
several details of the male terminalia, but differs from the latter in the pres-
ence of 6-7 setae on the apex of the basimere and in the other features as given
in the above diagnosis. Carter and Wijesundara (1948: 143-144) noted that it
is a comparatively larger form similar to iphis from India.
The type and other specimens in the type series of campilunati were com-
pletely destroyed during transit except for the single slide of the male terminal-
ia (Dr. P. F. Mattingly, per. comm. ). The above recognition of this species
as distinct from pluvialis is based on this specimen only and more material is
required in confirming its specific status.
BIOLOGY. Except as indicated in the type data, nothing more is known
about the biology of camzilunati.
17. Culex (Eumelanomyia) selai Klein and Sirivanakarn
_ (Fig. 10A, & terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) selai Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969, Proc. ent. Soc.
Wash. 71: 589 (o*). } see Nac ooined
Culex (Eumelanomyia) selai, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE: Unknown.
MALE. Essentially as described by Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969: 589-
591); very similar to pluvialis and camypilunati, differing from them in the
following characters. Head, Decumbent scales on dorsal eye margin and in
center of vertex broader and predominantly dark; narrow decumbent scales
~ restricted to occiput; erect scales entirely dark; antennal flagellar whorls
more strongly plumose, normal whorls with 35 or more hairs. Terminalia
(Fig. 10A). As figured; tergal lobe of segment IX with 5-10 setae; basimere
with a row of 5-7 stronger submarginal setae which are flattened and striated,
resembling those’inC. malayi; apex of basimere bears 2-3 weak setae; later-
al plate of phallosome abruptly tapered to a short blunt apex, with a pronounced
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 49
angle on lateral margin, denticles stronger and apparently fewer, inner basal
denticle usually large or well developed.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown. . |
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (212) with terminalia slide, Kompong Sela,
Koh Kong, CAMBODIA, 5 November 1967, reared from larva from a pool under
forest in foothill area, J. M. Klein (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Presumably widely spread but at present, selai is known
only from the type locality in Cambodia and from Borneo, East Malaysia.
Material examined: 12¢.
CAMBODIA. Koh Kong: Kompong Sela, llc.
MALAYSIA. East Malaysia: Sabah, Tawau, 1¢.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. In addition to the diagnostic characters given
in the key, selai differs from fluvialis and campilunati conspicuously in having
broader and darker decumbent scales on the vertex and in having the erect
scales of the head entirely dark. This condition resembles the species in the
malayi subgroup so closely that it can be easily confused with them except by
the examination of the male terminalia. The type and other topotypic males
of selai from Cambodia are also distinct from pluvialis and campilunati in the
presence of a strong inner basal denticle on the lateral plate of phallosome
but in a specimen from Borneo, this denticle is poorly developed or absent.
BIOLOGY. The adult males of selai were obtained from general field catch
and from rearing larvae collected in a pool under forest shade in mountainous
areas of Cambodia. The field data of a single male collected from Borneo are ©
not available. Nothing is known about adult biology. |
Rhazani subgroup
The Rhazani subgroup includes only C. khazani and is characterized below
under the description of this species. In the earlier paper (Sirivanakarn 1971),
I provisionally assigned this species to the tenuijalpis subgroup. However,
after having studied the male terminalia in detail, I found it so distinct that
Iam now recognizing it as a separate subgroup. The Rkhazani subgroup is known
only from India.
18. Culex (Eumelanomyia) khazani Edwards
(Fig. 10B, o terminalia)
Culex khazani Edwards 1922b, Indian J. med. Res. 10: 286 (o*, °); Barraud
1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1281 (<*, 9).
Culex (Micraedes) khazani, Edwards 1922a, Bull. ent. Res. 13: 92 (¢’).
Culex (Mochthogenes) khazani, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect.
fasc. 194: 195 (taxonomy); Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera 5:
357-40, 9, Lids
Culex (Eumelanomyia) khazani, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.5 mm, fore femur 1.25 mm, abdomen 1.5mm. Small
sized, dark brown species. Head. Decumbent scales on dorsum of vertex
predominantly narrow and fine; broader along lateral eye margin; erect scales
slender, predominantly pale or yellowish brown; palpus about 0. 2 of proboscis;
proboscis with 4 strong and dark labial basal setae which are slightly longer
than palpus. Thorax. Integument of scutum and scutellum brown; scutal
scales narrow, rather fine and entirely dark; acrostichal bristles present,
widely spaced; dorsocentral bristles strong and dark; pleuron paler than scutum
except for mep whichis as dark as scutum, scales absent; 1 lower mep bristle
present. Legs. Anterior surface of hind femur nearly entirely white from
base to apex; tibiae and tarsi dark scaled.- Wing. Scales narrow, long and
moderately dense. Abdomen. Terga dark brown scaled; sterna paler scaled.
MALE. In general similar to female, with the following diagnostic features.
46 | Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
Head. Proboscis without false joint; flagellar whorls of antenna weakly plu-
mose, normal whorls with about 15 hairs, minor whorls with 4-5 hairs.
Terminalia (Fig. 10B). Tergum of segment IX with a prominent median lobe
bearing 10 strong setae and a linear row of 7-8 weaker setae on each side
laterally; basimere distinct in shape, inner tergal surface slightly swollen,
with numerous strong and weak setae which are densely packed; a few scales
present on external tergal surface; subapical lobe clearly divided into proxi-
mal and distal divisions, proximal division with 3 rods, 2 of which are stout
and 1 very narrow and thin, distal division with a lateral group of 1 strong
seta and 1 very broad and rather thick leaflet and a distinct mesal lobe which
bears 4 narrow blade-like setae and 1 spatulate leaflet; distimere distinct in
shape, basal half uniformly thick, apical half expanded before tapering into a
broad truncate apex, claw small and placed apically, 2 ventral subapical
setae and 6-7 minute setae present just beyond the middle; phallosome sub-
spherical in shape, dark brown, lateral plate broad oval-shaped, with 10-12
heavy denticles on inner tergal surface and a variable number of weak denticles
laterally; proctiger crown dark, medium sized, consisting of several strong
spine-like-spicules, lateral paraproct and cercal sclerite dark and strongly
sclerotized; 3-4 cercal setae present.
PUPA. Unknown.
LARVA. Based on 2 whole mounted specimens tentatively associated with
the adults by Barraud (1934: 357). Head 0.65 mm, siphon 1.5 mm, index 8, -
saddle 0.30 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 5. In general conforms to the subgenus
with the following diagnostic features. Head. Antennal shaft entirely dark,
spicules strong; hair 1-C a dark stout spine; 4-C long, about as long as the
distance between bases of the pair; 5, 6-C strong, subequal in length, their
tips reaching beyond anterior margin of frontoclypeus, 5-C double; 6-C usually
double (2-3); 7-C 6-7b. Thorax. Unspiculated; 3-P triple; 4-P as long as 1 or
2-P, single; 7-P double; 8-P single. Abdomen. Hairs 6-I-II strong and dark,
double; 7-I as strong as 6-I-II, single; comb scales about 40 in number, all
equal in size and with even fringes of fine spicules; hair 2-VIII single. Siphon.
Moderately long and slender; uniformly brownish; 12 pecten teeth present,
graded in size, distal teeth slightly longer than basal ones, most distal teeth
with 3 strong basal denticles and 10-12 fine distal denticles; siphonal tufts 6
pairs in number, subventral in position, each 5b, all subequal in length, about
as long as siphon width at point of insertion. Anal segment. Concolorous with
siphon; hair 2-X double; ventral brush of 7 pairs of hairs, all inserted within
grid; anal gills as long as saddle. 3
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male, Pudupadi, Malabar Coast, 8S. W. INDIA, -
reared from larva collected from a tree hole, November 1915, Rai-Sahib, Sub-
assistant Surgeon, Khazan Chand (BM). |
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from India. Material examined: 3°, 19,
21. INDIA. Pudupadi, Malalabar Coast, S. W., 1c (holotype). Kadra, North
Kanara, 2¢¢, 19, 2 L.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. khazani as interpreted here is known only
from India. The record of this species in North Vietnam by Galliard and Ngu
(1949) is incorrect judging from their published figures of the larva and the
male terminalia. It appears most probable that the specimens recorded by
these authors are in fact C. malayi. The type and other topotypic material of
khazani agrees well with the description and the figure by Barraud (1934).
The larva which was tentatively associated with the adult by Barraud is prob-
ably correct on the basis of the field data.
C. khazani which is considered here as belonging to its own subgroup is
strongly differentiated from other members of the mochthogenes group by
the tergal lobes of segment IX, basimere and distimere of the male terminalia.
It appears to be related to the tenuipalpis subgroup on the basis of similarity
in the shape and denticulation of the male phallosome. The presumptive larva
of this species is also very distinct from the known larvae in the other sub-
groups of mochthogenes in having hairs 4, 5 and 6-C strong and long; pro-
thoracic hair 4-P of the same magnitude as hairs 1 and 2-P and in having the
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 47
siphonal tufts inserted subventrally. nie |
| BIOLOGY. The type and other topotypic adult specimens of this species
were obtained from rearing the larvae collected in treeholes, but the correlated
skins were not preserved. The biology of the adults is unknown.
tenuipalpis subgroup
FEMALE. Small to medium sized species, wing length between 2. 7-3. 7
mm. Head, Anterior dorsal margin and center of vertex clothed with narrow,
linear decumbent scales; palpus from 0.1 to 0.2 of the length of proboscis;
labial basal setae as long as palpus. Thovax. Acrostichal bristles well devel-
oped; pleural area uniformly pale brown; a few pale translucent scales present
on upper corner of stp; lower me? bristle present. Abdomen, Terga usually
entirely dark, sometimes with narrow basal pale bands on terga II-VI; sterna
paler scaled than terga. 7 ee ;
MALE. Similar to female in general, differing in the following. Head.
Palpus varied from 0. 2 to 0. 75 of proboscis length; labial false joint usually
present and clearly marked at 0.75 of the length from extreme base; large
flagellar whorl densely plumose, with 30-40 hairs. Terminalia, Tergal lobe
small with 5-7 weak and short setae; basimere slender, elongate, roughly
conical, inner tergal surface usually with 1 strong submarginal seta, some-
times with a linear row of 4-5 strong submarginal setae; subapical lobe not
clearly divided into proximal and distal divisions; proximal division with 3
slender, subequal rods, distal division with a strong seta and a very small,
rather indistinct leaflet laterally and with 4-5 close-set blades mesally;
distimere slender, sickle-shaped, moderately long and tapered to a small
point distally, subapical claw slender and short; lateral plate of phallosome
broad oval or sometimes distally tapered, denticles strong and numerous,
proctiger crown with a few strong and several weak spinelike spicules.
PUPA. Abdomen 1.9-2.2 mm, paddle 0.45-0.65 mm, trumpet 0. 42-0. 6
mm, index 9-11. In general conforms to the description of the mochthogenes
group, the following hairs are characteristic. Cephalothorvax and Metanotum.
Hair 8-C double, sometimes single; 9-C single or double; 10-C double.
Abdomen. Hair 5-IV usually 3-4b, sometimes double; 5-V, VI usually double,
sometimes 3-4b; hair 4-VIII single, sometimes double.
LARVA. Head 0.65 mm, siphon 0.95-1.2 mm, index 5, siphon/saddle
ratio about 3. Essentially as described for the mochthogenes group, rather
similar to the foliatus subgroup in having prothoracic hair 4-P considerably
weaker than hair 3-P and in several features of the chaetotaxy, differing in
the following. Head. Usually with pattern of dark and light areas; hair 1-C
rather longer. Thorax. Hair 4-P always double. Abdomen. Hairs 6-II-VII
double or triple. Siphon. Relatively thicker and darker, subventral tufts
stronger, from 3-5 times as long as siphonal width at points of insertion.
DISCUSSION. The tenuitalfis subgroup as reinterpreted here is a complex
of 5 closely related species, including tenuipalpis Barraud 1924, vichei Klein
1970, hayashii Yamada 1917, hackeri Edwards 1923 and kiriensis Klein and
Sirivanakarn 1969. This grouping is based on the similarity in several details
of the male terminalia, type of decumbent scales of the vertex and in strong
plumosity of the male antennal flagellar whorls. Of these 5 species, hackevri
and kiriensis have the male palpus as short as in the female whereas tenuipal-
pis, richei and hayashii have the male palpus verying from 0. 5 to 0. 75 of the
proboscis length. The identity of these species is determined by the relative
length of the male palpus, the shape of the lateral plate of the male phallo-
some, the number of denticles present and the number of submarginal setae
of the basimere. The female cibarial teeth are also diagnostic as this struc-
ture varies in number, size, and in arrangement of the teeth among different
species. The pupae and larvae which are known only in certain forms also
appear to show specific differences in the branching of certain hairs.
The tenuipalpis subgroup is perhaps the most interesting lineage from the
standpoint of evolution and speciation of Eumelanomyia in the Oriental region.
48 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
On the basis of the comparative male morphology, this subgroup appears to be
most generalized, showing an overlap with the protomelanoconion group in the
length of male palpus and in the male terminalia. The type of the male phal-
losome in the majority of species in this subgroup is similar in being sub-
spherical and apparently resembles that of simplicicornis in the rubinotus -rima
group. Within the mochthogenes group, the tenuipalpis phallosome also shows
an overlap with the khazani, okinawae, pluvialis and malayi subgroups. This
evidence seems to suggest that the tenuipalpis subgroup is probably the most.
primitive stock which was derived from the vubinotus-vima group and then
gave rise to the }votomelanoconion group and subgroups of the mochthogenes
group. This relationship between the members of the tenuipaljis subgroups
and other subgroups of mochthogenes is also partially supported by the com-
parative morphology of the immature stages. The affinities between the tenui-
falpis subgroup and the rubinotus-rima group can not be further clarified here
until the subgenus as a whole is completely revised from a broader range of
distribution than the present study.
The members of the tenuipalfis subgroup are more or less restricted to
a high altitude and those with known immature stages breed in ground pools.
In the Oriental region this subgroup has been recorded only from India,
Thailand, Malaya, Cambodia and the Ryukyu Islands with extension into Japan
and Korea and probably also into China and U.S.S. R. a
19. Culex (Eumelanomyia) tenuipalpis Barraud
(Figs. 10C, o¢ terminalia; 10D, ? cibarial armature;
| 11A, pupa; 11B, larva)
Culex tenuipalpis Barraud 1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1278 (**, 9);
Barraud 1924b, Indian J. med. Res. 12: 433 (L*); Barraud and Covell
1928, Indian J. med. Res. 15: 671-679 (? buccopharyngeal armature*).
Culex (Neoculex) tenuipalpis, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect.
. fase. 194: 195 (taxonomy); Barraud’1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera,
a An (**, 9, L*); Bram 1967, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 29 (o*,
var if e
Culex (Eumelanomyia) tenuipalpis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.7 mm, fore femur 1.1 mm, proboscis 1.6 mm. Brown
to dark brown, medium sized species. Head. Decumbent scales on anterior
dorsal margin and in center of vertex narrow and predominantly pale yellowish;
erect scales numerous, very slender, pale anteriorly, dark posterolaterally;
palpus slender, about 6.2 of proboscis length; 2 labial basal setae as long as
palpus. Cibarial armature.(Fig. 10D). Distinctive; cibarial bar with at least
60 fine and pointed teeth in row which is strongly convex in middle and concave
towards lateral flanges. Thorax. Scutum brownish, scutal scales predomin-
antly dark except for some pale ones on anterior promontory and anterior mar-
gin of fossa; acrostichal bristles rather strong; pleuron same color as scutum
or sometimes dark above, pale below; upper corner and lower posterior bor-
der of stp with a few pale translucent scales. Legs. Anterior surface of hind
femur silvery white scaled. Wing. Plume scales narrow, dark and rather
dense on all veins. Abdomen. Terga III-VII with narrow pale basal bands,
or sometimes entirely dark; sterna pale scaled.
MALE. Similar to female except for the following. Head. Decumbent
scales on vertex and scales in lateral patch paler; palpus longer, about 0.5 of
proboscis length, apparently 5-segmented, segments 4 and 5 very short and
bare, its combined length about 0. 2 of the length of segment 3; labial basal
setae as in female; labial false joint present and clearly marked by flexion just
beyond the middle; antennal flagellum very strongly plumose. Terminalia
(Fig. 10C). Tergal lobe of segment IX small, 5-6 tiny setae present; basimere
slender, conical, inner tergal surface with 1 strong submarginal seta basad,
lateral tergal area with a small number of weak setae; strong bristles confined
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 49
to external tergal surface; proximal and distal divisions of subapical lobe not
clearly divided, all setae placed close together; proximal division with 3
slender subequal rods; distal division with 1 strong basal seta and 1 narrow,
thin acuminate leaflet laterally and a mesal group of 2-3 hair-like setae and 4
flattened apically blunt blade-like setae, of which the most distal is provided
with a fringe of fine spicules subapically; distimere slender, sickle-shaped,
basal half broad, with 2-4 fine setae dorsally, apical half tapered to a small
point; subapical claw slender and short; 1 or 2 tiny ventral subapical setae
present just beyond middle of curvature; phallosome globular or subspherical
in shape, lateral plate broad oval, with about 20 heavy denticles scattered on
tergal surface; proctiger crown medium sized, consisting of 4-5 coarse and
several fine and pointed spicules, paraproct narrow, with a small apical lobe;
3 tiny cercal setae present.
PUPA (Fig. 11A). Abdomen 2.2 mm, paddle 0.56 mm, trumpet 0.6 mm,
index 10-11. Pigmentation pale yellowish; trumpet dark, relatively long and
uniformly cylindrical; pinna with slit extended to meatus; chaetotaxy as figured,
the combination of the following hairs is diagnostic. Cephalothorax and Metano-
tum. Hairs 7, 8-C double; 8-C very strong and long; 9-C single; 10-12-C
double. Abdomen. All hairs relatively strong and long; hairs 5-II, III double;
5-IV-VI double; 6-III- VI double; 2-VII always mesad of 1-VII. Paddle. Same
color as abdomen; midrib weak and lightly pigmented; hairs 1, 2-P present,
1-P very weak and short, 2-P stronger and longer.
LARVA (Fig. 11B). Based on a single skin from the type locality. Head
0.65 mm, siphon 1.2 mm, index 5, saddle 0.38 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 3.
As figured, with the following distinctive features. Head. Antennal shaft dark
at base, pale in middle and slightly dark beyond hair 1-A; hair 4, 5-C tiny,
subequal, about 0.3 of the length of hair 6-C, both single; 6-C double, almost
reaching anterior margin of frontoclypeus. Thorax. Hair 4-P minute, about
0.25 of hair 3-P, double; 7, 8-P single. Abdomen. Hairs 6-HI-VI double;
comb scales about 40 in number, all equal in size and with rounded apical
fringe of fine spicules. Szphon. Broad at base, strongly tapered and curved
upwards distally; 5 pairs of ventral tufts present, the first 2 tufts 3b, their
lengths 4-5 times as long as siphon width at point of insertion, the next 2 tufts
gradually shorter, 4b; the most distal tuft very short, 4b, about 1.5 times as
long as siphon width at point of insertion; pecten teeth 8-9 in number; hair 2-S
a long and strong spine; hair 9 of ventral valve of spiracle strong and hooked
apically. Anal segment. Hair 1-X 4b; 2-X double; ventral brush with 6 pairs
of hairs, all inserted within grid.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male (BM 1923-585) with terminalia slide,
5, 900 ft, Darjeeling Hills, Suveil, E. Himalaya, INDIA, October 1922,
P, J. Barraud (BM). SELECTION OF BRAM (1967: 31).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the north of India and Thailand.
Material examined: (12c', 23¢9,1L; 3 with associated pupal skins.
INDIA. Suveil: near Mungpoo, Darjeeling Hills, E. Himalaya; 10<, 219,
eo |
THAILAND. Chiang Mai: Tad Mue Fall, Doi Sutep, 1c. Mae Hong Son:
Ban Mae Honua, 10,29, 3p.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. tenuipalpis appears to be restricted to the
high mountain areas and at present it has definitely been recorded only from
India and Thailand. The record by Brug and Bonne-Wepster (1947: 186) from
Java requires confirmation. The above description of the adults and larva of
tenuipalpis is based largely on the topotypic material from India and that of
the pupa is based on the specimens correlated with the known males from
northern Thailand. Among the members of the tenuipalpis subgroup, this
species is very similar to richei and hayashii in having a long male palpus
about 0.5 of the length of proboscis. It is, however, separated from richei
by the presence of only 1 strong submarginal seta on the basimere (4 in YicheiZ)
and from hayashii by the presence of 2-4 tiny setae in basal half of the disti-
mere and by the presence of more numerous denticles on the lateral plate of
the phallosome. The female is distinguished from hayashii by the presence of
20 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
more numerous cibarial teeth. The pupa and larva are also distinct from
hayashii as indicated in the keys and as in the above diagnosis. The basal
pale bands on the abdominal terga of tenuipalpis adults are present in all
topotypic specimens from India but are absent in those from Thailand. How-
ever, as the specimens from the two localities show no differences in the male
terminalia and in the female cibarial armature, I have no doubt that they are
conspecific.
- BIOLOGY. The breeding habitats of tenuipalpis in India (Barraud 1924b,
1934) are roadside pools and in Thailand elephant foot prints. In India, col-
lection of the specimens was made at an altitude of 5, 000-5, 500 ft. (approxi-
mately 1600 m) and those from Thailand were at an altitude of about 900 m. A
single male collected in Thailand was from a light trap. Nothing is known about
adult biology.
20. Culex (Eumelanomyia) richei Klein
(Fig. 12A, o& terminalia)
Culex aa richei Klein 1970, Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 72: 504-506
J
FEMALE. Unknown.
MALE. As characterized by Klein (1970: 504-505), very similar to
C. tenuipalpis, differing particularly in the following features. Head. Palpus
longer, about 0.75 of proboscis length; labial basal.setae of proboscis weaker
and shorter. Thorax. Acrostichal bristles on scutal disc stronger, scutal
scales finer, shiny brown and rather sparse. Abdomen. Terga and sterna
-entirely dark scaled. Tervminalia (Fig. 12A). Essentially as figured here and
by Klein (1970: 505), similar to tenuipalpis in general facies and in the shape
of the phallosome, differing from it in the following. Inner surface of basi-
mere with a linear row of 4 strong submarginal setae which are sinuous and
recurved towards apices; proximal division of subapical lobe with 3 rather
thick rods; distal division with a lateral group of a strong seta, a large acu-
minate leaflet and a mesal group of 2 strong setae and 4 flat apically blunt
blade-like setae of which the most distal one is fringed with fine spicules
subapically; phallosome with strong denticles confined to inner tergal surface
of lateral plate, lateral tergal area bare; proctiger with larger crown of more
numerous spines. ee
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (456) with terminalia slide, Popork Vill. ,
in Bokor Hill, Kampot, CAMBODIA, 24 February 1969, J. M. Klein (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality. Material examined:
1 & (holotype), as indicated in the type data.
3 TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. This species although described from a single
male is undoubtedly distinct on the basis of the characters as given in the key
and as described above. It is separable from tenuipalpis and hayashii by hav-
ing a longer palpus which is about 0. 75 of the proboscis length and by the pres-
ence of 4 strong submarginal setae on the basimere of the male terminalia.
BIOLOGY. The single male of vichei was collected from a forest in hill
country in association with specimens of Riviensis, bokorensis, otachati and
selai. Nothing is known about its breeding habitat and adult biology.
21. Culex (Eumelanomyia) hayashit Yamada
(Figs. 12B, ¢ terminalia; 12C, ? cibarial armature;
13A, pupa; 13B, larva)
Culex hayashii Yamada 1917, Zool. Mag. Tokyo, 29:67 (o*, 9, P, L, E);
Edwards 1921, Bull. ent. Res. 12: 336 (o*),
Culex (Neoculex) hayashii, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc.
194: 195 (taxonomy); Bohart and Ingram 1946, U. S. Navmed 1055: 71
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 51
(o*, 9, L*, E); LaCasse and Yamaguti 1950, Mosq. Fauna, Japan and
Korea, 257 («*, 9*, L*); Monchadskii 1951, Tabl. anal. Faune U.S.S. R.
37: 250 (L); Hara 1957, Japan J. exp. Med. 27: 57 (2 terminalia*) Lien
1962, Pacif. Ins., 4: 631 (distribution).
Culex (Eumelanomyia) hayashii, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy.
FEMALE. Wing 3.0-3.7 mm, fore femur 1.5-1.9 mm, proboscis 1.9 mm.
In general extremely similar to tenuipalfis, differing in the following. Head.
Narrow decumbent scales on vertex finer and entirely pale yellowish; all erect
scales yellow or yellowish white. Czbarial armature (Fie. 12C). Cibarial bar
with about 50 teeth, lateral teeth coarser than middle teeth, all arranged in
concave row. Thorax. Scutal integument paler, light brown; scutal scales
predominantly light brown; scutellar scales yellowish pale. Abdomen. Terga
entirely brown or dark brown scaled; sterna yellowish scaled. :
MALE. In general similar to female, differing from tenuipalpbis and vichei
in the following. Head, Palpus varying from 0.5 to 0.75 of proboscis length.
Terminalia (Fig. 12B). As figured, extremely similar to tenuipalpis, differ-
ing chiefly in the following. Basal half of distimere without any setae on dor-
sal surface; lateral plate of phallosome more or less pointed at apex, denticles
fewer, about 7-10 present, all are restricted to inner tergal surface.
PUPA (Fig. 13A). Abdomen 1.9 mm, paddle 0.45 mm, trumpet 0.42 mm,
index 9. Generally similar to tenuipalpis, differing from it in having weaker
hairs and in the following. Cepfhalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C weak,
subequal to 9-C. Abdomen. Hair 5-IV 3-4b; 5-V, VI double; 6-IV-VI usually
4b(3-4); 2-VII lateral to 1-VII.
LARVA (Fig. 13B). Head 0.65 mm, siphon 0.95 mm, index 5, saddle
0.30 mm, siphon/saddle ratio 3. In general similar to tenuipalpis, differing
in the following. Head, Hair 4-C shorter than 5-C; 5-C about 0.5 of 6-C.
Abdomen. Hairs 6-IU-VI triple. Siphon. Slender, slightly tapered distally
and straight, not curved upwards; 6 pairs of siphonal tufts present, all appar-
ently weaker and shorter, first 5 tufts about 2-3 times as long as siphon width
at point of attachment; hair 2-S weaker and shorter. Anal segment. Hair 2-X
with 1 long and 2 short branches; ventral brush usually with 1 or 2 proximal
hairs detached from grid.
TYPE DATA. The original description of hayashii by Yamada was based
on the males, females, pupae, larvae and eggs from Tokyo, Japan, but type
designation was not specified. All of these specimens were deposited in the
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo.
Dr. Manabu Sasa informs us that they are no longer available for lectotype
selection. pete :
DISTRIBUTION. Material examined: 19,299, 12 L; 8 with associated lp
skins.
- JAPAN. Honshu: Sagiyama Saitama; Tokyo; 5,39,
KOREA. Seoul, 3c, 4 L.
RYUKYU ISLANDS. Okinawa: Kochiya; Chizuka; Nakasoni; Arokawa;
Ishigaki Inoda; Yaeyama, 3/4 mi southwest of Ibaruma; 70°, 239, 5 L.
Iriomote: 11/2 mi north of Toyohara village; G. Takaesu, 2 mi west of Yabu
village; 4°,49, 31, 8 lp.
Additional records from the literature: TAIWAN (Lien 1962); U.S.S.R.,
Maritime Province (Monchadskii 1951). |
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The adults of C. hayashii show a great deal
of variation in size, color, texture of scutal scales and in the length of male
palpus. The specimens from the Ryukyu Islands differ from the specimens
from Japan and Korea in smaller size, darker coloration, finer scutal scales
and shorter male pulpus. However, these differences are not correlated with
any differentiation in the male terminalia, indicating that there is in all prob-
ability only one species involved.
C. hayashii is apparently a common form and is quite well known in Japan
(LaCasse and Yamaguti 1950) and Okinawa in the Ryukyu Islands (Bohart and
D2 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
Ingram 1946). The records of this species from Taiwan by Lien (1962) and
from U.S.S.R. by Monchadskii (1951) are doubtful as these were based only
on the larva. In addition to the records given above, it is possible that hay- —
ashii may also occur on mainland China.
Except as noted in the keys, C. hayashii is extremely similar to tenuipal-
pis in male characters but can be clearly distinguished from the latter by the
female cibarial armature, pupa and larva as described above. The adults of
this species also differ from the typical form of tenuifalpis in the absence of
basal bands on the abdominal terga. In the Ryukyu-Islands and possibly also
in Taiwan, the immature stages and the females of this species can be easily
confused with okinawae from which it differs most strikingly in several fea-
tures of the male terminalia. The close similarity between the male termin-
alia of hayashii and tenuipalpis strongly suggests that it is probably derived
from the latter through geographic isolation.
BIOLOGY. The most frequent breeding sites of hayashii in Japan
(LaCasse and Yamaguti 1950) include fresh water ponds, drainage ditches
and irrigation ditches at an altitude of about 1000 m. The larvae were col-
lected in association with the specimens of Anopheles sinensis and Culex (C.)
tritaeniorhynchus. In the Ryukyu Islands (Bohart and Ingram 1946), the
immatures were collected mainly from rock pools or side pools of a small |
stream in association with Culex (C.) bitaeniorhynchus and Culex (L.) infantu-
lus. The current field record from a treehole by A. B. Silagan in Iriomote,
Ryukyus as noted above is probably erroneous. Nothing is known about adult
biology.
22. Culex (Eumelanomyia) hackeri Edwards
(Figs. 14A, o terminalia; 14B, ? cibarial armature)
Culex hackeri Edwards 1923, Bull. ent. Res. 14: 4 (Cc).
Culex (Mochthogenes) hackeri Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. fasc.
194: 195 (taxonomy).
Culex (Eumelanomyia) hackeri, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
%: 62-85 (taxonomy). .
FEMALE. Wing 3.0 mm, fore femur 1.5 mm, proboscis 1.9mm. Ahbdo-
men 1.9mm. Medium sized, very dark to nearly black species. Very similar
to tenuipalpis and hayashii, differing in darker coloration and as in the follow-
ing. Head, Palpus shorter, about 0. 1 of proboscis length; labial basal setae of
proboscis about as long as palpus. Cibarial armature (Fig. 14B). Cibarial
teeth more numerous, about 90 in number, all very fine, subequal in size,
arranged in a broad convex row. Thovax. Integument of scutum and scutellum
nearly black; scutal scales as dark as integument. Legs. Anterior surface
of hind femur with silvery white stripe extending from base to apex. Wing.
Plume scales very dense on all veins. Abdomen. Terga dark to black scaled;
sterna paler scaled. |
MALE. Differing from tenui~alpis and hayashii generally as described for
female and as in the following. Head. Palpus shorter, varying from 0. 15-0. 20
of proboscis length; labial false joint not clearly marked. Terminalia (Fig.
14A). Extremely similar to tenuipaljis, differing in having blade-like setae
in distal division of subapical lobe stronger and broader, lateral plate of phal-
losome with 5-6 strong and 7-8 small denticles; proctiger crown darker and
larger, spicules apparently more numerous.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male, Cameron Highlands, 3500-5000 feet,
Pahang, (Malaya)WEST MALAYSIA, 1923, Dr. H. P. Hacker (BM); PRESENT
SELECTION.
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality. Material examined:
45, 22.
’ TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The malayan hackeri is known only from 4
males and 2 females in the original type series. In Edwards' description of
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 53
this species, the male terminalia were not illustrated. I have, however,
checked the type and other specimens in the type series and found them agree-
ing well with his verbal description of this species.
C. hackevi shows a great deal of similarity to tenuipalpis in details of the
male terminalia, but differs strikingly from the latter in having the male palpus
reduced to about 0.2 of the length of the proboscis. The female cibarial arma-
ture also resembles tenuipalpis in the arrangement of the teeth except as in-
dicated in the key and as described above.
BIOLOGY. The breeding habitat of this. species is ground pool. The
adults in the type series were obtained from mass rearing from larvae col-
lected in pools at the edges of a stream (Edwards 1923: 4). It is apparently
a rare form as no more specimens have ever been recovered from the type
_locality or from anywhere in Malaya. The collection of the original speci-
mens in the type series was from a high altitude.
23. Culex (Eumelanomyia) kiriensis Klein and Sirivanakarn
(Figs. 14C, ¢o terminalia; 14D, ? cibarial armature)
Culex (Mochthogenes) kiriensis Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969, Proc. ent.
Soc. Wash. 71: 583 (o*),
Culex (Eumelanomyia) kiriensis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 2.8 mm, fore femur 1.33 mm, proboscis 1.52 mm, ab-
domen 1.9mm. Very similar to hackeri, differing chiefly in the following.
Cibarial armature (Fig. 14D). Cibarial bar narrower; number of teeth greatly
reduced, about 16-18 present, middle 12 teeth fine, long and pointed, lateral
4-6 teeth shorter, much coarser and abruptly pointed or truncate apically, all
in a slightly concave row. _. cs
MALE. As described by Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969: 583); in general as
in female, similar to hackevi in having palpus reduced to about 0.2 of probos-
cis, differing in the following. Head. Proboscis relatively thicker, labial
false joint clearly marked at about 0. 75 of the length from base. Tevminalia
(Fig. 14C). Blade-like setae in the distal division of subapical lobe 4 in
number (5 in hackeri); distimere more slender, subapical claw narrower but
relatively longer; lateral plate of phallosome tapered dorsally into a blunt apex,
0-6 strong denticles present, all apparently restricted to inner tergal surface.
PUPA. Abdomen 2.2 mm, paddle 0.65 mm, trumpet 0.6 mm, index 10.
As figured for tenuipalpis and hayashii, differing particularly in the following
chaetotaxy. Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 8-C single or with 1 long and
1 short branch; 9-C very weak and short, single or double; 10 and 11-C weaker.
Abdomen. Hair 5-II-III, 7-8b; 5-IV, V usually 4(4-5) and 3-4b respectively,
their length about 0.5 of the segments following; 5-VI triple; 2-VI dorsolateral
to 1-VII; 4-VIII double.
LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (409) with slide of terminalia, Bokor hill,
Kampot, CAMBODIA, 25 April 1968, J. M Klein (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from Thailand and Cambodia. Material ex-
amined: 160,12; 3 with associated pupal skins.
THAILAND. Lampang: Ngao, Payao road; Ban Pha Daeng; 6,19, 2 p.
Nakhon Ratchasima: Khao Yai National Forest, 2c. Kvabi: Khao Aopong,
come se
CAMBODIA. Kampot: Bokor hill (Type Locality), 1% (holotype). Kampong
Sfeu: Kirirom hill; O'Tachat; Pichnil Stung Chral; 6c’. :
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. kiriensis Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969) was
originally recognized only in the male. The above description of the female
and pupa of this species is based on a specimen definitely correlated with the
male through reared material recently received from Thailand. This species
is apparently more common than the malayan hackevi and also appears to be
widely spread throughout Thailand and other adjacent countries. However, at
54 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
present it is known only from Thailand and Cambodia.
C. kiriensis undoubtedly belongs to the tenuipaltis subgroup on the basis
of the general external features and male terminalia. The male palpus of this
species is as short as in hackeri which is strikingly different from tenuitalpis,
richei and hayashii, It can be clearly separated from hackevi and also the 3
other mentioned species by the shape of the lateral plate of the phallosome and
by the female cibarial armature as figured and as described above. The chae-
totaxy of the pupa is also distinct from tenuipalpis and hayashii in the combina-
tion of certain hair branchings as described above. The male phallosome of
kiriensis is apparently rather similar to the members of the fluvialis and
malayi subgroups. The female cibarial armature is rather unique, unlike all —
other known Oriental species and shows some resemblance to vubinotus and
andreanus from the Ethiopian region (Edwards 1941: 250).
BIOLOGY. The adults of kiviensis were collected while resting on low
vegetation near a stream in mountain forests. The pupae were collected twice,
once in a pool in the middle of a dried up stream and once in a pool at stream
margin. The biology of the adults is practically unknown.
okinawae subgroup
The okinawae subgroup includes only okinawae and is characterized below
in the description of this species. This subgroup is distinguished from the
tenuipalpis subgroup in the male terminalia by characters of the tergal lobes
of segment IX, basimere and the distimere. It shows a strong affinity with
members of the tenuipalpis subgroup on the basis of similarity in the shape
of the lateral plate of the male phallosome and in the immature stages. At
present, this subgroup is known only from the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan and the
Philippines. The recorded breeding habitats are rock pools and ground pools.
24, Culex (Eumelanomyia) okinawae Bohart
(Figs. 15A, o terminalia; 15B, ¢ cibarial armature;
16A, pupa; 16B, larva)
Culex (Neoculex) okinawae Bohart 1953, Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 55: 187 (c*,
5 P, L te
Culex (Neoculex) lini Lien 1968, Trop. Med. Nagasaki, 10: 225 (c'*, ?, P*,
L*), NEW SYNONYM.
Culex (Eumelanomyia) okinawae, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy). :
FEMALE. Wing 2.8-3.6 mm, fore femur 1. 3-1.6 mm, proboscis 1. 6-
1.8 mm. Small or medium sized, dark to black species. Head. Decumbent
scales on dorsum of vertex entirely narrow, predominantly pale yellowish;
erect scales numerous, slender and entirely dark; lateral patch of broad
appressed scales dingy white; palpus 0.2 of proboscis length; 4 labial basal
setae present, all hair-like, 2 lateral setae longest, about as long as palpus.
Cibarial armature (Fig. 15B). Cibarial bar with about 50 narrow and pointed
teeth, all equal, in a row which is weakly convex in middle and slightly con-
cave towards lateral flanges. Thorax. Scutal integument and scales brown to
dark brown; acrostichal bristles very well developed, in 2 closed rows on
anterior half of scutal disc, sometimes extending to prescutellar space; dorso-
central bristles very strong; pleuron same color as scutum, usually devoid
of scales, sometimes a few pale ovate scales present on propleuron and upper
corner of stp; 1 lower mep bristle usually present, sometimes absent. Legs.
Anterior surface of hind femur almost entirely pale. Wing. Plume scales
narrow, linear and moderately dense on all veins. Abdomen. Terga dark
scaled; sterna paler scaled or as dark as terga.
LE. In general as described for female; very similar to members of
the tenuipalpis subgroup, differing from them as in the following. Head. Pal-
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 55
pus more slender, about 0.5 of proboscis in length; labial false joint absent;
flagellar whorls of antenna weakly to moderately plumose, normal large whorls
with 15-25 long hairs, minor whorls with 7-8 short hairs. Terminalia (Fig.
15A). Terga and sterna of segment IX darker, more strongly sclerotized, ter-
gal lobes prominent, close together near midline, each bears 9-12 strong setae;
basimere abnormally large, broad rectangular in shape, inner tergal surface
with 4-5 moderately long submarginal setae; subapical lobe very broad and ~
prominant, proximal division with 3 rods, 1 of whichis straight with expanded
truncate apex, 1 wavy in outline with gently hooked apex and 1 elbow-like with
expanded truncate apex, distal division with a strong flattened basal seta later-
ally and a cluster of 4-5 strong blade-like setae and 1 large odd-shaped blade
mesally; distimere large and strongly modified, basal half narrow, apical half
expanded, ending in a broad truncate, recurved apex, subapical claw short and
very small, ventral subapical seta present or absent, dorsal subapical seta
minute, usually present; phallosome dark, strongly sclerotized, broad oval in
shape, lateral plate with 6-7 heavy denticles and a few weak and small denticles;
proctiger crown dark, medium sized, consisting of several strong spicules,
lateral paraproct and cercal sclerite dark, strongly sclerotized, cercal setae
3-5 in number. | ;
PUPA (Fig. 16A). Abdomen 2.0 mm, paddle 0.6 mm, trumpet 0.5 mm,
index 7. Chaetotaxy as figured, very similar to hayashii in the tenui-alpis
subgroup, differing in the following. Cephalothorax and Metanotum. Hair 7-C
single; 9-C single; 11-C single or double. Abdomen. Hairs 1-IV-VII 4, 2, 2,
and 2b respectively; 5-IV-VI double, all subequal in length, slightly longer
_.than the segment following; 6-III-VI double. Paddle. Male genital lobe large,
about 0. 5 of paddle length.
LARVA (Fig. 16B). Head 0.85 mm, siphon 1.2 mm, index 7, saddle 0. 32
mm, siphon/saddle ratio 3-4. Very similar to hayashii in the tenuipalpis sub-
group, differing particularly in the following. Head, Antennal shaft usually
entirely dark; head capsule with more striking pattern of dark and light areas.
Thorax. Hair 4-P usually single, rarely double; 7-P single. Abdomen. Hairs
6-II-VI double. Siphon. Darker, concolorous with dark areas on head; length
and index greater. Anal segment. Same color as siphon; hair 2-X usually
single (1-2).
TYPE DATA. (1) Culex (N.) okinawae Bohart 1953, holotype: male with
slide of terminalia, East Taira, Okinawa, RYUKYU ISLANDS, 21 September,
1951, R. Bohart (USNM). (2) Culex (N.) lini Lien 1968, holotype: male ~
(62249. 9) with larval and pupal skins and allotype: female (62249. 10) with _
larval and pupal skins, pool on stream bed, Chulu (800 m), Peinan, Taitung
Hsien, TAIWAN, 10 December 1961, J. C. Lien and L. C. Lu (Taiwan Pro-
ony Malaria Research Institute, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of
China).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan and the
Philippines. Material examined: 12¢, 119, 13 L; 3 with associated lp skins.
RYUKYU ISLANDS. Okinawa: East Taira (Type Locality); 1 mi north of
Arokawa; 2¢, 4 L. Iviomote: 11/2 mi south of Sonai village, 1o, 4 L, 1 lp.
TAIWAN. Chulu: Peinan, Taitung Hsien, 1c’, 19, 2 lp.
PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Trinidad Mountain Province; San Fernando; 10¢,
109, 5 L.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. I have compared 1 male and 1 female paratype
of lint Lien 1968 from Taiwan with the type and other topotypic material of
okinawae and found them identical in all stages. Accordingly, Iam synonymiz-
ing lini with okinawae. The record of this species from the Philippines is
based on the adult specimens previously misidentified as C. brevipalpis in the
collection of the U. S. National Museum.
The adults of okinawae are variable in size. The Philippine specimens are
apparently larger than those from the Ryukyu Islands and Taiwan. There is,
however, no indication of differentiation in the male characters of all speci-
mens which I have examined. The male of okinawae is similar to tenuipalpis,
richei and hayashii in having a long palpus about 0.5 of the proboscis length
26 ines Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
but is strongly differentiated from them in several features of the terminalia
as described above. The female cibarial armature is closely similar to that
of hayashii and is apparently indistiguishable from the latter except through
correlation with the immature stages and the male. This species is probably
earvee from members of the tenuifaljis subgroup through geographical iso-_
ation
BIOLOGY. The breeding habitat of okinawae includes rock pools and .
ground pools in the vicinity of streams. The collections of the specimens
from the reported areas were made ata See. high altitude. Nothing is
known about the adult biology.
iphis subgroup
C. iphis is treated here as a distinct subgroup separated from the tenui-
palpis subgroup on the basis of differences in several features of the male
terminalia and plumosity of the male antennal flagellar whorls. The subgroup
characters are given below in the description of 7this. The breeding habitat _
of this species is unknown. The adults were collected from a high elevation
and at present zjhis is known only from the southern part of India.
25. Culex (Eumelanomyia) iphis Barraud
(Fig. 15C, o terminalia)
Culex iphis Barraud 1924a, Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1279 (c%*, 2).
Culex (Mochthogenes) iphis, Edwards 1932, in Wytsman, Genera Insect. ,
fasc. 194: 195 (taxonomy); Barraud 1934, Fauna Brit. India, Diptera
Pig o8( de 2 ), |
Culex (Eumelanomyia) iphis , Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst.
7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Wing 3.9 mm, fore femur 2.1 mm, proboscis 2.4 mm, abdo--
men 2.7 mm. A rather large species for the subgenus; color dark brown.
Head. Decumbent scales on dorsum of vertex narrow, linear and predom-
inantly pale yellowish; lateral patch of broad appressed scales bluish white;
erect scales entirely dark; palpus about 0. 2 of proboscis length; labial basal
setae 4 in number, all dark and subequal, nearly as long as palpus. Czbarial
armature (Fig. 15D). As figured, cibarial bar small, with about 30-40 nar-
row pointed teeth in a concave row. Thorax. Scutal integument dark brown,
scutal scales narrow, predominantly dark except for a few pale ones on ex-
treme anterior promontory and anterior margin of fossa; acrostichal bristles
present, widely spaced; pleuron same color as scutum; upper corner of sip
with or without a few pale translucent scales; 1 lower mep bristle present,
sometimes 2. Legs. Anterior surface of hind femur with a pale white stripe
extending from base to about 0. 75 of the whole length, apical 0. 25 dark; all
tibiae and tarsi dark. Wing. Plume scales narrow, long and very dense on
all veins. Abdomen. Terga entirely dark scaled; sterna pale yellowish
scaled.
MALE. In general similar to female with the following diagnostic features.
Head, Palpus about 0.2 of proboscis length; labial basal setae about 6 in num-
ber, all dark, subequal, about 0.75 of palpal length; flagellar whorls of anten-
na strong but rather sparse, normal whorls with about 15 hairs, minor whorls
with about 5 hairs. Terminalia (Fig. 15C). Tergal lobe of segment IX well
developed, with 12-15 moderately strong setae; basimere small, typically
cone-shaped, inner tergal surface with a linear row of 4-6 strong, flattened
submarginal setae, tergomesal margin with several short, strong marginal
setae; subapical lobe clearly divided into proximal and distal divisions, proxi-
mal division with 3 rather short rods, 2 of which are stout with truncate apices,
1 slender with hooked and pointed apex, distal division with a strongly chitinized
narrow leaflet laterally and a distinct mesal lobe which bears 2-3 strong setae
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 957
and.1 lanceolate blade-like seta; distimere sickle-shaped, basal half broad, uni-
formly thick, apical half tapered to truncate apex which is strongly recurved
dorsally, subapical claw strong, spiniform, ventral subapical seta distinct,
placed near middle of curvature, dorsal subapical seta minute, distad of ven-
tral; lateral plate of phallosome strongly sclerotized, more or less triangular-
shaped, 15-16 strong denticles present on its upper tergal surface; proctiger
crown dark, medium or large in size, consisting of 6-7 flat and apically blunt
spicules laterally and several finer spine-like spicules internally; 3 cercal
setae present. | :
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Lectotype: male, Nilgiri Hills, Madras, INDIA, September
1915, Khazan Chand (BM). PRESENT SELECTION. 3
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality in India. Material
examined: 60, Of.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. The original description of iphis by Barraud
(1924) was based on both sexes but no holotype was selected. In view of this,
I therefore selected 1 male in the type series as the lectotype. The above
description of this species is based exclusively on the material in the original
type series. All of these specimens agree well with the description and fig-
ures by Barraud (1924a, 1934). At
C. iphis is very distinct from other members of the mochthogenes group
in several features of the male terminalia and on this basis, I am placing it
in a subgroup of its own. The adults of iphis are generally similar to those
in the tenuipalpis subgroup from which it is distinguished in the female by the
presence of smaller number of cibarial teeth and in the male by the less plu-
mose flagellar whorls of the antenna, the palpus as short as in the female,
and by details of the terminalia as indicated in the key and in the above descrip-
tion. The lateral plate of the male phallosome of zjhis is rather unique, in
being more or less triangular, showing similarity to that of the Ethiopian
horridus (Edwards 1941: 296-270). The affinities of 7jhis with the other
Oriental species as well as with the Ethiopian horridus will not be clear until
its immatures are known.
BIOLOGY. The breeding habitat of ithis is not yet known. In the type
locality in India the adults were collected at a high elevation.
bokorensis subgroup
The bokorensis subgroup is recognized here to include only bokorensis
Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969 and is characterized below in the description of
this species. In the earlier paper (Sirivanakarn 1971), I placed this species
with the Ethiopian forms in the inconspicuosus subgroup. However, after
having compared the bokorensis male with some members of that subgroup,
I found it so distinct in several features of the terminalia that I now feel
justified in placing this species within its own subgroup. This subgroup is
known only from Cambodia.
26. Culex (Eumelanomyia) bokorensis Klein and Sirivanakarn
(Fig. 17A, o terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) bokorensis Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969, Proc. ent.
Soc, “Wash. , ‘Fi; 987 C)
Culex (Eumelanomyia) bokorensis, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy)
FEMALE. Unknown.
MALE. Essentially as described and figured by Klein and Sirivanakarn
(1969: 587-589) and as in the following redescription. Head, Decumbent
scales on dorsum of vertex narrow, predominantly yellowish; lateral patch
of broad appressed scales pale along eye margin, grayish or dark posteriorly;
08 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
erect scales entirely dark; palpus thin, about 0.2 of proboscis length; probos-
cis slender, false joint absent, labial basal setae about 4 in number, all dark,
hair-like, as long as palpus; flagellar whorls of antenna moderately long plu-
mose, normal whorls with 15-20 hairs, minor whorls with about 8 hairs.
Thorax. Scutal integument dark brown; scutal scales narrow, rather fine and
nearly black; acrostichal bristles few, only 2-3 pairs present in middle of
scutal disc; pleuron same color as scutum; scales absent; 1 lower me? bristle
present. Legs, Anterior surface of hind femur pale whitish from base to
apex; all tibiae and tarsi dark to black scaled. Wing, Plume scales narrow,
black and moderately dense on all veins. Abdomen. Rather narrow and long,
terga and sterna dark brown to black scaled. Terminalia (Fig. 17A). Most
distinctive; tergal lobe of segment IX very small, with 2-3 tiny setae; basi-
mere large, strongly sclerotized, sacklike in shape, lateral tergal margin
strongly swollen basally, narrow apically, inner tergal surface convex, with
several strong bristles from near base to the level of the subapical lobe,
bristles on lateral tergal surface numerous and very strong; subapical lobe
prominent, proximal division produced into an elongate stem which bears on
its apex 1 very thick, dark and apically blunt rod and 2 slender rods, its base
with 1 broad acuminate leaflet, 1 very long seta and 3-4 other shorter strong
setae, distal division with 1 strong simple seta and 4 strong, blunt tipped
blades some of which are serrated subapically; distimere thick, with pronounced ~
angle at middle dorsally, basal half thick, apical half scooped downwards and
tapered into small, blunt apex, subapical claw small and short, 1 or 2 tiny sub-
apical setae present beyond middle ventrally and laterally; lateral plate of
phallosome dark brown, heavily sclerotized, broad oval, tapered distally into
a blunt apex, several strong denticles present; proctiger crown dark, medium
or large sized, consisting of several strong spinelike and some blunt tipped
spicules, lateral paraproct and cercal sclerite dark, 2-3 cercal setae present.
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (886) with slide of terminalia, Bokor hill,
Kamjtot, CAMBODIA, 24 April 1968, J. M. Klein (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from the type locality in Cambodia. Material
examined: 6c.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. bokorensis is generally very similar to
hackeri and kiriensis of the tenuipalpis subgroup but is strikingly differentiated
from them by the spectacular modification of the basimere and distimere of the
male terminalia. It can be readily recognized in general by the presence of
only a few acrostichal bristles on the scutal disc and in the male terminalia
by several features of the basimere, distimere and phallosome as indicated in
the key and as described above. The male terminalia of bokorensis is appar-
ently rather similar to the inconspicuosus subgroup (see Edwards 1941: 277-
279) in the shape of the distimere, but differs significantly in having the claw
placed subapically instead of mid-dorsally as in all members of that subgroup.
There are also several other fundamental differences in the male terminalia
which justify placing bokorensis in a distinct subgroup of its own. The rela-
tionship between bokorensis and other species in the Oriental region can not be
determined or speculated on until the immature stages are known.
BIOLOGY. The males of bokorensis were collected along the margin of a
stream under heavy shade of a tropical forest at an altitude between 300-800
m. At the type locality, the specimens were found in association with those of
kiriensis. Nothing is known about its breeding site and adult biology.
otachati subgroup
The otachati subgroup is strongly differentiated from the other subgroups
of the mochthogenes group in the shape of the lateral plate of the male phallosome
as indicated in the key and as described below. Except for its very distinc-
tive male phallosome, this species generally conforms to the mochthogenes
group characters. At present it has been recorded only from Cambodia and
Thailand.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 59
27. Culex (Eumelanomyia) otachati Klein and Sirivanakarn
(Fig. 17B, o terminalia)
Culex (Mochthogenes) otachati Klein and Sirivanakarn 1969, Proc. ent. Soc.
Wash., 71: 585 (2).
Culex (Eumelanomyia) otachati, Sirivanakarn 1971, Contrib. Amer. Ent.
Inst. 7: 62-85 (taxonomy).
FEMALE. Unknown.
MALE. As described by Klein and Sirivanakarn (1969: 585-587) and as in
the following redescription. Rather small, dark brown to black species; wing
length about 2.2 mm. Head, Decumbent scales on anterior eye margin of ver-
tex broad and pale, forming a narrow distinct ocular line; decumbent scales
in center narrow, yellow, more or less restricted to dorsal midline; erect
scales slender, entirely brownish; lateral patch of broad appressed scales
dingy white or grayish; palpus a little less than 0. 2 of proboscis length; false
joint present at about middle of labium; labial basal setae 10 in number, all
dark, hair-like and long, about 1.5 times as long as palpus; flagellar whorls
of antenna weakly plumose, normal large whorls with about 15 hairs, minor
whorls with 8-10 hairs.. Thorax. Scutal integument dark brown; scutal scales
narrow, fine and entirely dark; acrostichal bristles present; dorsocentral
bristles very strong and long; pleuron with striking pattern of dark and light
areas; scales entirely absent; 1 lower met bristle present. - Legs. All femora,
tibiae and tarsi entirely dark scaled. Wing. Plume scales small, clavate and
moderately dense on all veins. Abdomen. Terga and sterna very dark to black
scaled. Terminalia (Fig. 17B). In general rather small; tergal lobe of seg-
ment IX poorly developed, with a row of 4-7 weak and short setae; basimere
slender, roughly conical, about 0.2 mm in length, inner tergal surface without
strong submarginal setae, strong bristles largely confined to lateral tergal
surface; setae of subapical lobe clearly aggregated into proximal and distal
divisions, proximal division with 3 subequal rods, all apparently with truncate
apices, distal division with 1 strong basal seta and a dense group of 4-5 acute
flattened setae and 4 club-shaped blades, the 2 most distal of which are pro-
vided with coarse fringes of spicules along the margins; distimere sickle-
shaped, about 0.5 of the length of basimere, dorsal surface with 1-2 small
scale-like setae near middle of curvature, distal part tapered to slightly re-
curved truncate apex, subapical claw long and broad apically, ventral subapi-
cal seta present just beyond middle; phallosome deep brown and very strongly
sclerotized, distinct in shape, lateral plate thick, rodlike in apical half, apex
pointed and diverged laterally, 6-7 strong, heavy tooth-like processes present,
restricted to lateral margin, basal part with a broad, dark sternal lobe; procti-
ger crown dark, size medium or large, consisting of 4-6 flat and blunt spicules
laterally and several finer and pointed spicules internally, lateral paraproct
and cercal sclerite dark and strongly sclerotized, cercal setae 2 or 3 in num-
ber. ,
PUPA and LARVA. Unknown.
TYPE DATA. Holotype: male (827) with slide of terminalia, Kirirom Hill,
O Tachat, Kompong Speu, CAMBODIA, 19 April 1968, J. M. Klein (USNM).
DISTRIBUTION. Known only from Cambodia and Thailand. Material ex-
amined: 9c.
THAILAND. Nakhon Ratchasima: Khao Yai National Forest, 1°.
CAMBODIA. Kompong Speu: O Tachat; Pichnil Stung Chral; 8 ¢.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION. C. otachati superficially resembles the mem-
bers of the foliatus and hinglungensis subgroups in size and in general external
features but is strongly differentiated from them in the type of phallosome and
in several other features of the male terminalia. The affinity of ofachati with
other members of the mochthogenes group cannot be determined until its imma-
ture stages are known. On the basis of the male terminalia, this species ap-
parently belongs to a subgroup of its own.
BIOLOGY. The adult males of otachati were collected while resting on
60 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
vegetation along a stream margin under heavy forest shade in hilly or moun-
tainous areas. It appears to be rare and was found in association with speci-
mens of kiviensis. The breeding habitat and adult biology are unknown.
28. Culex (Eumelanomyia) sp. Philippine form
The Philippine material which is recorded here as sp. 28 consists of 1.
correlated pupal and larval skin and 2 whole larvae collected from a rock-
hole, No. 599 Osmena, Samar by J. Laffoon, dated 27 April 1945 and 4 cor-
related pupal and larval skins collected from a treehole, No. 1004, Olongapo,
Luzon by Zolik, dated 25 June 1945. All of these specimens were obtained
from the Rozeboom, Knight and Laffoon team collection made during World
War II. The associated adults were apparently lost and it is not possible here
to associate this material with any of the known adults. The pupa and larva
are quite distinct from all known members in the mochthogenes group as indi-
cated in the keys. The pupa is very similar to the malayi subgroup in general
and in most features of the chaetotaxy except for having hair 11-C single. The
larva is generally as figured for C. malayi however it differs from the latter
in having prothoracic hair 3-P 3-4b, 4-P single and as long as 1 or 2-P, 8-P
double and in the undifferentiated comb scales.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to express my sincere thanks to the following persons who,- in vari-
ous ways, have provided assistance in completing this study. To Dr. Botha de
Meillon, Project Leader, Southeast Asia Mosquito Project for editing, helpful
criticisms in improving the manuscript and for nearly all correspondences in
obtaining the specimens for study; to Dr. Alan Stone and Dr. Curtis W.
Sabrosky, Agriculture Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture,
-for valuable discussions with regard to problems involving type specimens;
and for allowing me to use their private libraries and to examine the types at
the U. S. National Museum; to Dr. P. F. Mattingly for his promptness in
answering questions about types, for his courtesy extended to me while studying
specimens at the British Museum and for the loan of specimens; to Thelma Ford
for preparation of all illustrations; to Phuang Thong Malikul for technical assis-
tance in preparing terminalia slides and in gathering distribution data and to ~
Mrs. Janet Rupp for typing the final draft for off-set reproduction. |
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 61
BAISAS, F. E.
| 1935.
BARRAUD, P. J.
19
24a.
1924b.
1934.
BARRAUD, P. J.
1928.
BELKIN, J. N.
1962.
BOHART, R. M.
1945.
1946.
1953.
BOHART, R. M.
see Sane.
LITERATURE CITED
Notes on Philippine mosquitoes, II. Genus Culex: Groups
Lophoceraomyia, Mochthogenes and Neoculex. Philipp. J.
Sci. 57: 167-179.
A revision of the culicine mosquitoes of India, part XIII.
Further description of Indian species of Culex L. including
three new species. Indian J. med. Res. 11: 1275-1282.
A revision of the culicine mosquitoes of India, part XVII.
Further descriptions of the larvae of Indian species of Culex.
Indian J. med. Res. 12: 427-434.
The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma.
Diptera 5, family Culicidae, tribes Megarhinini and Culicini.
Taylor and Francis, London, 463 pp.
and G. COVELL.
The morphology of the buccal cavity in anopheline and
culicine mosquitoes. Indian J. med. Res. 15: 671-679.
The mosquitoes of the South Pacific. Univ. Calif. Press,
Berkeley, 2 vols, 608 and 412 pp.
A synopsis of the Philippine mosquitoes, U. S. Navmed 580,
Wash., D. C., 88 pp.
A key ‘to Chinese culicine mosquitoes, U. S. Navmed 961,
Wash., D. C., 23 pp.
A new ‘species’ of Culex and Notes on other species of mosqui-
toes from Okinawa. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 55: 183-188.
and L. INGRAM.
Mosquitoes of Okinawa and islands of the Central Pacific...
U. S. Navmed 1055, Wash., D. C., 110 pp.
BONNE-WEPSTER, J.
1954.
BOREL, E.
1926.
1930.
BRAM, R. A.
1967.
BRUG, S. L.
1932.
1939.
BRUG, S. L.
1931.
BRUG, S. L.
1947,
CARTER, H.
Synopsis of a hundred common non-anopheline mosquitoes of
the Greater and Lesser Sundas, the Moluccas and New Guinea.
Roy. trop. Inst. Amst. Spec. Pub. 111, 147 pp.
Les Moustiques de la Cochinchine et du Sud-Annam. (J), Arch.
Inst. Pasteur d'Indochine. 47 pp.
Les Moustiques de la Cochinchine et du Sud-Annam. Mon.
Coll. Soc. Pat. exot. 3, 423 pp.
Contributions to the mosquitoes of Southeast Asia (Diptera, |
Culicidae). II. The genus Culex in Thailand. Contrib.
Amer. Ent. Inst. 2: 1-296.
Notes on Dutch East-Indian Mosquitoes. Bull. ent. Res.
23: 73-83.
Notes on Dutch East-Indian mosquitoes. Tijdschr. voor Ent.
82: 91-113.
and F. W. EDWARDS.
Fauna Sumatrensis, Culicidae (Diptera). Tijdschr. voor Ent.
74: 251-261.
and J. BONNE-WEPSTER.
F.
1948.
The geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of the Malay
Archipelago. Chron. Nat. 103: 179-197.
and D. P. WIJESUNDARA.
Notes on some Ceylon culicine mosquitoes. Ceylon J. Sci.
23: 135-151.
62 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
CHU &.
1957. - Collection of megarhine and culicine mosquitoes from
Hainan Island, South China, with description of a new species.
| Acta Zool. Sinica, 9: 145-163.
1958. Advances in the study of culicine mosquitoes of Hainan, South
China. Indian J. malar. 12: 109-113. — .-
DELFINADO, M. D.
: 1966. The culicine mosquitoes of the Philippines, Tribe Culicini
(Diptera, Culicidae). Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst. 7: 1-252.
EDWARDS, F. W.
1917. Notes on Culicidae, with descriptions of new species. Bull.
ent. Res. 7: 201-229.
1921, A revision of the mosquitoes of the Palearctic region. Bull.
ent. Res. 12: 263-351.
1922a. Mosquito Notes, II. Bull. ent. Res. 13: 75-102.
1922b. A synopsis of adult oriental culicine (including megarhinine
and sabethine) mosquitoes. Indian J. med. Res. 10: 249-293.
1923. Mosquito Notes, IV. Bull. ent. Res. 14: 1-9.
1930. Mosquito Notes, IX. Bull. ent. Res. 21: 287-306.
1932. Diptera, Family Culicidae. In Wytsman, Genera Insect. ,
fasc. 194, 258 pp. -
1941. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian III. Culicine adults and pupae.
Brit. Mus. (nat. hist. ), London, 499 pp.
GALLIARD, H. and D. V. NGU.
1949. Culicine du Tonkin I. Les genres Ficalbia et Mochthogenes.
Ann. Parasit. 24: 495-502. ca
KLEIN, J. M.
1970. A new species of Culex (Neoculex) from Cambodia. Proc.
ent. Soc. Wash. 72: 504-506.
KLEIN, J. M. and S. SIRIVANAKARN.
1969. Four new species of Culex, subgenus Mochthogenes from
Southeast Asia (Diptera, Culicidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.
T1: 582-592.
KNIGHT, L. K.
1970a. A Mosquito Taxonomic Glossary I. Adult Head (External).
Mosq. Syst. Newsletter. 2: 23-33.
1970b. A Mosquito Taxonomic Glossary II. Adult Head (Internal).
Mosq. Syst. Newsletter. 2: 69-81.
LACASSE, W..J. and S. YAMAGUTI.
1950. Mosquito fauna of Japan and Korea. Off. Surgeon, 8th U. S.
Army, Kyoto, 268 pp.
LEE, D. J. ous
1944 An atlas of the mosquito larvae of the Australasian region.
Tribe Megarhinini and Culicini. Austral. Military Forces, -
116 pp.
LEICESTER, G. F.
1908. The Culicidae of Malaya. Stud. Inst. med. Res. F. M. S.,
3: 18-261.
LIEN, J. C.
1962. Non-anopheline mosquitoes of Taiwan: annotated catalog and
bibliography. Pacif. Insec. 4: 615-649.
1968. New species of mosquitoes from Taiwan (Diptera, Culicidae),
Part V. Three new subspecies of Aedes and seven new spe-
cies of Culex. Trop. Med. Nagasaki, Japan, 10: 217-262.
MATTINGLY, P. J. and E. N. MARKS.
1955. Some Australian mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) of the sub-
ere of pace and Neoculex. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W.,
80: 163-176.
PETERS, W. and S. C. DEWAR. 7
1956. A preliminary record of the megarhine and culicine mosquitoes
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 63
of Nepal with notes on their taxonomy (Diptera, Culicidae).
7 Indian J. Malar. 10: 37-51.
SIRIVANAKARN,
1)
1971. Contribution to the mosquito fund of Southeast Asia. X. A
proposed reclassification of Neoculex Dyar based principally
on the male terminalia. Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst. 7: 62-85.
STONE, A.
1967. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supple-
ment HU (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 69:
1970. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, Supple-
ekg (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 72:
37-17
STONE, A. and R. M. BOHART.
1944, Studies on mosquitoes from the Philippine Islands and
Australia (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.. 46:
205- 225.
STONE, A., K. L. KNIGHT and H. STARCKE.
1959. A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera:
Culicidae). Ent. Soc. Amer. (Thomas Say Found. ), Wash.,
D. C., 358 pp.
THEOBALD, F. V.
1909. riage ne ps of the new mosquitoes collected by Dr. Graham
n Ashanti. Colon. Rep. misc. Ser., No. 237: 1-31. |
ATG - monograph of the Culicidae. Vol. 5. British Museum,
London, 646 pp.
WATTAL, B. L., N. L. KALRA and K. S. KHRISHNAN.
1966. "Description of Culex (Mochthogenes) shrivastavii sp. n.
from Andaman islands, India. Bull. Indian Soc. Malar.
~ Comm. Dis. 3: 159-161.
WORTH, C. B. and B. DE MEILLON. -
1960. Culicine mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) recorded from the
province of Mocambique (Portugese East Africa) and their
relationship to arthropod-borne viruses. Anais Inst. Med.
trop. 17: 231-256.
64 _ Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
FIGURES
Male terminalia of C. simplicicornis
Female cibarial armature of C. simplicicornis
Male terminalia of C. malayensis
Female cibarial armature of C. malayensis
FIGURE 1.
_ FIGURE 2. Male terminalia of C. brevipalpis ©
Male antennal flagellum of C. breviftalpis
Female cibarial armature of C. brevipalpis
Male terminalia of C. phangngae
FIGURE 3. Pupa of C. brevipalpis
Larva of C. brevipalpis
FIGURE 4. Male terminalia of C. uncinatus |
Male terminalia of C. foliatus
Female cibarial armature of C. foliatus
Male terminalia of C. latifoliatus
FIGURE 5. Pupa of C. foliatus
Larva of C. foliatus
FIGURE 6. Male terminalia of C. hinglungensis
Male terminalia of C. catavactarum
Male terminalia of C. baisasi
Male terminalia of C. castrensis
Male terminalia of C. malayi
Female cibarial armature of C. malayi
Male terminalia of C. laureli
Female cibarial armature of C. laureli
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 8. Pupa of C. malayi
Larva of C. malayi
FIGURE 9. Male terminalia of C. yeageri
Female cibarial armature of C. yeageri
Male terminalia of C. pluvialis
Male terminalia of C. campilunati
Male terminalia of C. selai
Male terminalia of C. khazani
Male terminalia of C. tenuipalpis
Female cibarial armature of C. tenuitalpis
FIGURE 10.
FIGURE 11. Pupa of C. tenuipalpis
Larva of C. tenuipalpis
Male terminalia of C. vichei
Male terminalia of C. hayashii
Female cibarial armature of C. hayashii
FIGURE 12.
FIGURE 13. Pupa of C. hayashii
Larva of C. hayashii
Male terminalia of C. hackevi
Female cibarial armature of C. hackeri
Male terminalia of C. kiviensis
Female cibarial armature of C. kiviensis
_ FIGURE 14.
COW> D> OP Dre FOWP FOW> we SOW FOP be FOP We Fone Sor
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 65
FIGURE 15; A. Male terminalia of C. okinawae
B. Female cibarial armature of C. PUWe
C. Male terminalia of -C. iphis |
D. Female cibarial armature of C. iphis
FIGURE 16. A. Pupa of C. okinawae
B. Larva of C. okinawae
FIGURE 17. A. Male terminalia of C. bokorensis
B. Male terminalia of C. otachati
9 cibarial armature
o& phallosome & proctiger
o& basimere
C. (Eumelanomyia) simplicicornis
6. o5nm = 1!)
) cibarial armature
o& basimere
(ventral view)
& phallosome
(lateral view)
C. (Eumelanomyia) mal/ayensis @ proctiger
t+—_0.05mm——I
9 cibarial armature
P72
» 5
; pathy
A oat iw
eainyiay
ee
rey |
C. (Eumelanomyia) phangngae
0.5mm
#r,
(Eumelanomyia)
uncinatus
C. (Eumelanomyia)
latifoliatus
(Eumelanomyia) foliatus
Figs) .
-—_———————_ 0. 5 mm ———_1
~ pinna slit
median caudal
N
Fila
ment
9
subventral
tufts
C. (Eumelanomyia) foliatus
C. (Eumelanomyia)
cataractarum
C.
(Eumelanomyia)
castrens/s
C. (Eumelanomyia)
baisas/ aaa SSS
B
©
=
=
o
=
5
e)
=
5
Es:
UV
\
\
\
\
|
\
\
\
\
\
Sy & y
|
|
I)
C. (Eumelanomyia) malay
t+—0O.05mm——
cibarial
D
armature
Ot+
SSS 2 =
C. (Eumelanomyia) J/aureli
C. (Eumelanomyia) malayi
GS =
“ty
|!
+ 0.05 mm———__ B
cibarial armature )
C. (Eumelanomyia) yeageri
phallosome
lateral view
C. (Eumelanomyia) pluvialis C. -(Eumelanomyia) campilunati
C. (Eumelanomyia) selai C. (Eumelanomyia) — khazani
AN |
+——— 0.05mm ———+ D
cibarial armature 2
C. (Eumelanomyia) tenuipalpis
0.5mm
(BM1274:
Sureil, E. Himalayas)
C. (Eumelanomyia) tenuipalpis
t+— 0.05 mm —— c
cibarial armature 2
C. (Eumelanomyia) hayashii
C. (Eumelanomyia) hayashii
Fig. 14
a)
-&—0.05mm——_4
cibarial armature 2 B
C. (Eumelanomyia) —hackeri
a oes Ht
cibarial armature 2
(Eumelanomyia) kiriensis
+H — 0.05 mm ——4 B
cibarial armature 9
C. (Eumelanomyia) okinawae
~‘. -”
2 0.05mm——XH
cibarial armature )
ap ae pe
4 - ——S fi
(lateral view) Os . WA
C. (Eumelanomyia) iphis ot Sa
C. (Eumelanomyia) okinawae
16
Fig
bokorensis
(Eumelanomyia )
O
otachat/
( Eumelanomyia )
C.
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 83
APPENDIX A
TABLE OF DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT OF THE
ORIENTAL EUMELANOMYIA
SPECIES STAGES DISTRIBUTION HABITAT
es eee ON = gaa
RUBINOTUS-RIMA
GROUP |
1. simplicicornis * * - - EAST MALAYSIA unknown
2. malayensis * * - - WEST MALAYSIA unknown
PROTOMELANO-
CONION GROUP
3. brevipalpis * * * * INDIA, BURMA, bamboo,
| CEYLON, CHINA, treehole,
TAIWAN, RYUKYU artificial
ISLANDS, THAILAND containers
CAMBODIA, VIET-
NAM, EAST & WEST
MALAYSIA, INDO-
NESIA, PHILIPPINES,
NEW GUINEA, BIS-
ae ARC HIPELA-
G
4. phangngae BOR OX ee eae bamboo, tree-
hole
MOCHTHOGENES
GROUP
5. wuncinatus * * = - PHILIPPINES coconut shell?
6. foliatus * * * * THAILAND, SOUTH ~ ground pool,
VIETNAM, HONG- rock pool
KONG, EAST & WEST
MALAYSIA, ANDA-
MAN ISLANDS, INDO-
NESIA, PHILIPPINES
17. latifoliatus eh ea ae BILE iINeS ground pool
8. hinglungensis * - - - CHINA, THAILAND, = unknown
CAMBODIA, PHILIP-
PINES
9. castrensis * * * = INDIA, CEYLON unknown
10. cataractarum * * - - PHILIPPINES, NEW ~ unknown
BRITAIN (BISMARCK
ARCHIPELAGO)
* = stage or sex known
- = stage or sex unknown
84
11.
12.
18.
14.
15.
16.
Lh,
18.
19.
20.
ray
22.
23.
24.
20.
26.
27.
28.
SPECIES
baisast
—malayt
laureli
yeageri
p luvialis
campilunati
selai
Rhazani
tenuipalpis
vichet
hayashii
hackeri
kiriensis
okinawae
iphis
bokorensis
otachati
sp.
Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
oy
STAGES
aioe &
a ise
matte
. eae
at
Reg
eS
sey a
eee
sce Me
ae co Ke
i: a
*
APPENDIX A (Continued)
DISTRIBUTION
PHILIPPINES
INDIA, BURMA,
NEPAL, MAL-
DIVE ISLAND,
ANDAMAN ISLANDS,
CHINA, HONGKONG,
THAILAND, VIET- _
NAM, EAST & WEST
MALAYSIA, INDONE-
SIA, NEW GUINEA —
PHILIPPINES
PHILIPPINES
INDIA
CEYLON
CAMBODIA, EAST
MALAYSIA
INDIA
INDIA, THAILAND
CAMBODIA
JAPAN, KOREA, |
RYUKYU ISLANDS,
TAIWAN ? USSR ?
WEST MALAYSIA
THAILAND, CAMBO-
DIA |
RUYKYU ISLANDS,
TAIWAN, PHILIP- |
PINES
INDIA
CAMBODIA
THAILAND,
CAMBODIA
PHILIPPINES
HABITAT
axil of Coloc-
asia sp., rock-
pool
ground pool
ground pool
ground pool,
rock pool
rock pool
ground pool
ground pool
treehole
ground pool,
foot print
unknown
- ground pool
ground pool
round pool
rock pool
unknown
unknown
unknown
rockhole,
treehole
Sirivanakarn: Culex (Eumelanomyia) in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas 85
INDEX
Valid names are in roman type, synonyms are italicized.
Italicized pages
refer to the principal text references, roman numerals to the secondary text.
references, numerals and capital letters in parentheses to figures.
Aedes, 3, 7
aedes (Aioretomyia), ST, 38
albiventris group, 3
albiventris, 2, 3
andreanus, 94
Anopheles, 7
apicalis group, 3
baisasi, 6, 19, 20
35-36, (6C)
bitaeniorhynchus, 52
bokorensis subgroup, 19, 21, 57
bokorensis, 6, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24,
50, 57-58, (17A)
brevipalpis (Culex, Melanoconion,
Stegomyia), 5, 6, 12, 13- is.
17, 55, -42A, B, C: 3A, B)
campilunati, 6, 19, 20, 23, 24, 42,
43-44, 45, (9D)
castor, 19
castrensis subgroup, 19, 26, 31, 34
castrensis, 6, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24,
| 29, 31, ag. 34, 36, (6D)
cataractarum, 2, 6, 18, 19 20, 22s
23. 34. St. ans, (6B)
chiyutoi, 2, 19, 26, 27, 29
Culex, 1, 2, a oy
Culiciomyia, z. 5, 16
culionicus, 2, 18, 19,: 34, 3a, 33
Cyathomyia, 13 |
Eumelanomyia, 1, 2, 3-8, 16, 19,
24, 39, 40, 47
eumelanomyia group, 6, 7
femineus subgroup, 19
femineus, 19
fidelis, 13, 15
fimbriforceps, 19
foliatus subgroup, 19, 20, 22, 23,
24, 26-27, 31, 34, 36, 47, 59
foliatus, 2, 6; 29, 20," 22, 23, 24, 26,
27-29, 30, 33, 35, 40, (4B,
C: 6x ee
fusca, 2, 3
hackeri, 6, 19, 2% 23, 24, 47,
5a “5e. 54, 58, (14A)
2003 Bie
hamoni, 19
hayashii, 8, 99, 24. 93, 24.047, 0,
2, 54, 55, 56, (12B) C:
13a, s
helenae, 19
hinglungensis subgroup, 18, 19, 20,
2a, 20, 31, 34, 35, 36, 59
hinglungensis, 2, 6, 18, 19, 20, 22,
93, 24, 31-33. $435 A)
horridus, 2, 12, 57
inconspicuosa, 2, 3,
inconspicuosus subgroup, 18, 57, 58
inconspicuosus, 18
infantulus, 52
iphis subgroup, 19, 20, 21, 56
iphis, 6, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 56-57,
(15C, D
khazani subgroup, 19, 20, 24,.24,
45, 48
khazani, 6, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 45-
47, (10B)
kiriensis, 6, 19, 20, 23, 24, 47, 50,
53- 54, 58, 60, (14€, D)
latifoliatus, 6, 19, 20, 22, "95, 24,
26, 30- eae 2: A 4D
laureli, 6, 19, 20, 23. 24, 30, 36,
37, 38, 39, ‘40-41 42, (7C,
D)
lit, 2, 59; 94, 99
longipes, 13, 15
Lophoceraomyia, ay 10, 16, 40
macvropus, 13
Maillotia, 3, 6
malayensis, 6, 8. 9, 20-11, GC Dp)
malayi subgroup, 19, 20, a0: 23, 24,
26, 36, 42, 45, 48, 54, 60
malayi (Aedes, Culex), z. 3: 6, 19,
20, 22, 23, 24, 36, S740. 41,
42. 43. 46, 60, (7A, B; 8A, B)
mammilifer eroup, 24, 29
Melanoconion, 13, 15
Micraedes, of,
mijanae, 19 :
Mochthogenes, (subgenus), 1, 2, 3
mochthogenes group, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12,
17-19, 25, 26, 42, 46, At, 48,
a. 58, 09, 60
nigrescens, (Aedes, Danielsia), 33, 37,
38
Neoculex, 1, 3, 6
ngangae, 19
ae subgroup, Ped 20. Bae was
okinawae, 2, 6, 19, 21, 23, 24, 52,
54-56, (15A, B: 16A, B)
otachati subgroup, 19, 22, 58
otachati, 6, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 50,
59- 60, (17B)
86 Contrib. Amer. Ent. Inst., vol. 8, no. 6, 1972
phangngae, 5, 6, 12, 17, (2D)
pein 1G 6, 8,.9-10, 11, 82
pluvialis subgroup, 19, 20, 23. 30, (1A, B
42,43, 48, 54
simpliciforceps, 18
pluvialis, 6, 19, 20, 23, 24, 42-43, sinensis (Anopheles), 52
44, 45, (9C)
Frotomelanoconion (ekiat: 2.3
protomelanoconion group, 3, 6,
10 412 29, 48
pulchrithorax, 3
quintetti, 19
richei, 6, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 47,
Stegomyia, 13, 15
stellatus, 12
1; 8; tenuipalpis subgroup, 10, 19, 20, 21,
2
24, 26, 42, 45, 46, 47-48,
49, 54, 56, 57, 58
tenuipalpis, 6, 19, 21, 23, 24, 47,
48-50, 51)-52,.. 535. 54;..55,
B
49, 50, 51, 54, 55, (12A)” (10C, "D; i1A,
rima group, 3
rubinotus subgroup, 8
rubinotus-rima group, 6, 7, 8-9,
rubinotus, 7, 54
selai, 6, 19, 20, 23, 24, 42, 43,
44- 45, 50, (10A)
seyrigi group, 6
shrivastavii, 2, 19, 26, 27, 29
tricontus, 2, 18, 19, 31, 34,..35
Tripteroides, 7
tritaeniorhynchus, 52
uncinatus subgroup, 18, 19, 20, 21,
24
uncinatus, 6, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24
25226: (4A)
uniformis (Melanoconion), 133.45
yeageri, 6, 19, 20, 22, 23. 24, 30,
36, 39, 40, 41 -42, (9A, B)
Publication dates for Volume 7-
-Contributions of American Entomological Institute
Oo o' P OO De
August 28, 1970
March 29, 1971
May 9, 1971
July 30, 1971
July 2, 1971
September 30, 1971
ieee ae
ene
Per wi Se see er er een
Peete dese eee te a eee
ee ee A Le ee She | tal eh eel
RS ALO) RR RS Re LL,
rst
|
3 9088 00905
T
fm bau!
oh
Pe Seo eo
i=
peiepejials
vk
toe
=
nf
ae ba ha
hay
minpeies
*
e: An
pape pig
Peat rT
=
‘oa
a
Do pe ba
baie
pettss
Riel
$y iE
pris pels
*
iepei ats
ik
e5ey
foe
eg
oe
ae
Lon
ass
et
4
elele eh
t amabe:
Si
dah ad
PERS be
eleiabete
Los
e
ia
etm el eh
jertiaieierel©
. Aeorys hs
sh de
bal
*
sis
14
t
+
St
- y
sie
fans Se Leo
peiaiele Lag
inists|eta
iis
ele
ie
eer
tie iapete ape) et
joi epepele
pepebei ee
efeie)
a.
jofet.
Reha
epee la |
by
hms