'
•Xo s 2 Pioi 6
No. 21 August 2005
Forktail 21
2005
OBC Council
Tim Allwood (Publications Committee)
Phil Benstead (Chairman, Conservation Committee)
Nigel Collar (Chairman, Publications Committee)
Mike Edgecombe (Promotions)
Tim Loseby (Art and Photographic Editor)
Steve Rowland (Chairman)
Graeme Spinks (Treasurer)
Brian Sykes (Acting Secretary)
Margaret Sykes (Membership Secretary)
Richard Thomas (Advertising)
JimWardill (Meetings)
Alan Wilkinson (Internet)
Publications Committee
Tim Allwood, Stuart Butchart (Senior Editor, Forktail),
Nigel Collar, Adrian Long, Tim Loseby, Rene Pop, Nigel Redman,
Brian Sykes, Richard Thomas
Conservation Committee
Phil Benstead, Dave Buckingham, Mike Crosby, Geoff Hilton,
Carol Inskipp, Jon Riley, Simon Wotton
The Oriental Bird Club has been established for ornitholo¬
gists throughout the world, both amateur and professional,
who share a common interest in the region’s birds and wish
to assist in their conservation.
The Club aims to:
• Promote interest in the birds of the Oriental Region and
their conservation
• Liaise with, and promote the work of, existing regional
organisations
• Collate and publish material on Oriental birds
OBC Representatives
Susan Myers (Australia)
Paul Thompson (Bangladesh)
Filip Verbelen (Belgium)
Keo Omaliss (Cambodia)
Tony Gaston (Canada)
Ding Chang-qing (China)
Jin Mlikovsky (Czech Republic)
Torben Lund (Denmark)
Hannu Jannes (Finland)
Jean-Claude Porchier (France)
Axel Braunlich (Austria and Germany)
C. Y. Lam and Richard Lewthwaite (Hong Kong)
Asad Rahmani and Col. Shyam Singh (India)
Ria Saryanthi (Indonesia)
Chris Murphy (Ireland)
Carlo Violani (Italy)
Akira Hibi (Japan)
Jin- Young Park (Korea)
Mike Chong and Ooi Chin Hock (Malaysia)
Dr Tony Htin Hla (Myanmar [Burma])
Bird Conservation Nepal, Haris Rai (Nepal)
Jelle Scharringa and Bas van Balen (Netherlands)
Jan Ove Gjershaug (Norway)
Ashiq Ahmad Khan and Aleem Ahmed Khan (Pakistan)
Ray Tipper (Portugal)
Lim Kim Seng (Singapore)
Sarath Kotagama and Upali Ekanayake (Sri Lanka)
Per Alstrom (Sweden)
Beat Wartmann (Switzerland)
Fang Woei-horng (Taiwan)
Philip Round and Klos Boonthawee (Thailand)
Robert Kennedy (USA)
Jonathan Eames and Nguyen Cu (Vietnam)
Membership of OBC
Ordinary Member £15 p.a.
Family Member £20 p.a.
Reduced Rate Member £10 p.a.
For Oriental nationals resident in the region.
We encourage all members to pay the full
rate if they can afford it
Supporting Member £25 p.a.
Funding one Oriental member in addition
to Ordinary membership
Libraries and Academic Institutions £25 p.a.
Business Supporter £45 p.a.
The Oriental Bird Club is a Registered Charity No. 297242
For further information please write to:
Oriental Bird Club, P.O. Box 324, Bedford MK42 OWG, U.IC.
OBC Email address OBC Web Site
mail@orientalbirdclub.org http ://www. orientalbirdclub.org/
The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of Oriental Bird Club concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Cover picture: Chestnut-naped Forktail Enicurus ruficapillus ,
Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary, Narathiwas, Thailand, August 2003.
Photograph by Kanit Khanikul.
ISSN 0950-1746
© Oriental Bird Club 2005
FORKTAIL
Number 21, 2005
Senior Editor: Stuart Butchart
CONTENTS
MARK BARTER, LEI CAO, LIWEI CHEN and GANG LEI
Results of a survey for waterbirds in the lower Yangtze floodplain, China, in January-February 2004 . 1
V. KANNAN and RANJIT MANAKADAN
The status and distribution of Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis in southern India . 9
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India . 15
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Effectiveness of road transects and wetland visits for surveying Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus and
Sarus Cranes Gms antigone in India . 27
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK, LEE KWOK SHING, ZHANG JIAN-FENG and SU WEN-BA
Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan Island, China . 33
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan, with special reference to the present status ofWhite-headed Duck
Oxyura leucocephala . 43
JONATHAN C. EAMES
A preliminary ornithological assessment and conservation evaluation of the PT Daisy logging concession,
Berau district, East Kalimantan, Indonesia . 51
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor): status and distribution from surveys in August
2002-December 2004 . 61
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Species diversity, relative abundance and habitat use of the birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary,
Bangladesh . 79
NABIN BARAL, RAMJI GAUTAM and BIJAY TAMANG
Population status and breeding ecology of White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis in Rampur Valley, Nepal . 87
FRANCESCO GERMI
Raptor migration in east Bali, Indonesia: observations from a bottleneck watch site . 93
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003 . 99
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Birds ofTapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia . 121
HERMANN DOTTLINGER and MIKE NICHOLLS
Distribution and population trends of the ‘black shaheen’ Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus peregrinator and the
eastern Peregrine Falcon F. p. calidus in Sri Lanka . 133
S. van BALEN, N. J. COLLAR, D. LILEY and RUDYANTO
The White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps of Java: natural history and conservation status, especially on
Gunung Halimun . 139
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia . 149
Short Notes
E. M. SLADE, J. F. VILLANUEVA, B. TACUD and E. CURIO
First nesting observations of the Negros Bleeding-heart Gallicolumba keayi from Panay, Philippines . 161
ASHOKA JAYARATHNA, PRASANJITH CALDERA and EBEN GOODALE
Observations on the nesting and parental behaviour of Ashy-headed Laughingthrush Garmlax cinereifrons . 163
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
First record of Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus for Bhutan . 164
STEPHANIE J. TYLER
Foraging techniques of the Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus . 165
TOM ROBERTS and BEN KING
The call of Sykes’s Nightjar Caprimulgus mahrattensis . 166
MUHAMMAD IQBAL
New and noteworthy bird records from Sumatra, Indonesia
THE NATuRAL
istopv museu
2 4 AUG 2005
PURCHASED
2 U3F
167
S. SIVAKUMAR and VIBHU PRAKASH
Nesting of Jerdon’s Baza Aviceda jerdoni and Black Baza A. leuphotes in Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India . . . .169
PAUL HOLT
Franklin’s Gull Larus pipixcan at Tanggu, Tianjin: first record for China . 171
BEN KING
The song of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios in North Sulawesi, Indonesia . 173
K. SEEDIKKOYA, P. A. AZEEZ and E. A. A. SHUKKUR
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis habitat use and association with cattle . 174
YAT-TUNGYU
Longevity record of a colour-ringed Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor . 176
BEN KING
Vocalisation of the White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus . 177
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR and B. C. CHOUDHURY
Effect of incubating adult sex and clutch size on egg orientation in Sarus Cranes Gms antigone . 179
VOLKER KONRAD
First record of Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus in Singapore . 181
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
New sites for Mrs Hume’s Pheasant Syrmaticus humiae in north-east India based on hunters’ specimens and local
reports . 183
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
Significant records of birds in Nagaland, north-east India . 187
HEM SAGAR BARAL
Surveys for Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus in and around Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal . 190
WAYNE W. HSU and N. J. COLLAR
Black-chinned Fruit-dove Ptilinopus leclancheri and Scaly Thrush Zoothera danma on Taiwan . 193
Guidelines for contributors
inside back cover
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 1-7
Results of a survey for waterbirds in the
lower Yangtze floodplain, China,
in January-February 2004
MARK BARTER, LEI CAO, LIWEI CHEN and GANG LEI
A total of 515,896 waterbirds of 82 species was counted during a comprehensive, simultaneous count in the lower Yangtze River flood¬
plain, conducted during late January to early February 2004. Most of the important wetlands between the Three Gorges Dam and
the Yangtze estuary, a distance of 1,850 km, were visited. Ducks, geese and swans were most abundant, comprising 66% of waterbirds
counted, followed by shorebirds (17%), gulls (7%), and egrets and herons (5%). The ten commonest species were Bean Goose Anser
fabalis (79,758 individuals), Swan Goose Anser cygnoides (60,886), Dunlin Calidris alpina (40,709), Common Teal Anas crecca
(36,483), Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus (32,1 14), Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus (30,925), Greater White-fronted Goose
Anser albifrons (25,241), Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhyncha ( 22,562 ), Falcated Duck Anas falcata (18,364) and Lesser White-
fronted Goose Anser erythropus (16,937). These ten species comprised 70% of the total waterbird count. Twenty-three species were
found in internationally important numbers at one or more sites. Very high proportions of the estimated world populations of six
globally threatened species were found (Oriental Stork Ciconia boyciana, Swan Goose, Lesser White-fronted Goose, Siberian Crane
Grus leucogeranus, White-naped Crane G. vipio and Hooded Crane G. monacha). The numbers of Swan Geese and Lesser White-fronted
Geese counted exceeded the current global population estimates for these species. High proportions of the estimated flyway popula¬
tions were found for Black Stork Ciconia nigra , Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia and Tundra Swan, and for the global population
of the Falcated Duck. A total of 33 sites were identified at which at least one waterbird species was recorded in internationally impor¬
tant numbers. Nineteen sites supported at least one species in numbers exceeding 5% of the global or flyway population, and some
sites supported several, with Poyang Hu NNR (eight species >5%), Shengjin Hu (five), East Dongting Hu (four), Nanjishan (three)
and Cai Zi Hu (three) holding the most. Three important regions within the lower Yangtze River floodplain were identified: (1) Poyang
Hu; (2) Dongting Hu; and (3) Shengjin Hu and the lakes of the Anqing Yangtze River Wetland Provincial Nature Reserve. Waterbird
populations are reported to have declined in recent decades owing to hunting pressure. It is very important to establish a programme
to monitor waterbird numbers within the lower Yangtze River floodplain.
INTRODUCTION
The wetlands of the lower Yangtze River basin are of
great importance for a wide variety of waterbirds
(Scott 1989). The huge concentrations during the non¬
breeding season include many globally threatened
species. These include almost the entire global popula¬
tions of the Oriental Stork Ciconia boyciana
(Endangered) and Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus
(Critically Endangered), and significant proportions of
the global populations of Swan Goose Anser cygnoides
(Endangered), Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser
erythropus (Vulnerable), White-naped Crane Grus vipio
(Vulnerable) and Hooded Crane Grus monacha
(Vulnerable). Among the other threatened waterbird
species present within the region are Dalmatian
Pelican Pelecanus crispus (Vulnerable), Baikal Teal Anas
formosa (Vulnerable), Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri
(Vulnerable) and Scaly-sided Merganser Mergus
squamatus (Endangered; status from BirdLife
International 2004). BirdLife International has identi¬
fied five lake systems within the basin as Important
Bird Areas because of their large non-breeding popula¬
tions of threatened waterbirds, these being Chen Hu,
Cai Zi Hu, Shengjin Hu, Poyang Hu and Dongting Hu
(BirdLife International 2003).
Although the lower Yangtze River floodplain is
known to be of great importance for waterbirds, no
comprehensive and simultaneous count has been
carried out to obtain accurate information on water-
bird abundance and distribution throughout the region
over a short time period when numbers are at a
maximum. An analysis of available published count
data collected over the 1990-2003 period shows that
the best censused locations are Poyang Hu, East
Dongting Hu, Shengjin Hu and the Shanghai coastal
region, but it is likely that few of these counts are truly
comprehensive (Perennou et al. 1994, Anon. 1994,
1999a,b, 2001, Lopez and Mundkur 1997, Asian
Waterfowl Census unpublished data, Barter and Lei
unpublished data). Some of the other lakes within the
floodplain have been surveyed, but mostly only once or
twice since 1990, while others may never have been
surveyed.
In order to collect up-to-date comprehensive infor¬
mation on the distribution and abundance of
waterbirds in this highly threatened region, a simulta¬
neous count of waterbirds in the lower Yangtze River
floodplain was conducted during late January to early
February 2004. Other objectives of the survey were to:
collect data on the conservation status of the wetlands
surveyed; identify key wetlands which are currently
unprotected and recommend new protected areas;
involve provincial, nature reserve and university staff,
and local NGOs in the survey so that they could be
trained in survey techniques, waterbird ecology, and
waterbird identification and counting methods; and
improve public awareness of waterbirds and their
dependence on wetland habitats. This paper deals only
with the results of the waterbird counts.
METHODS
Survey area
The survey area covered the lower Yangtze River flood-
plain, extending 1,850 km from the Three Gorges Dam
(located near Yichang in western Hubei province) to
9
MARK BARTER et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
the river estuary at Shanghai. Most of the important
wetlands were visited. The two largest lakes in China
(Poyang Hu and Dongting Hu) and the Wuhan Lakes
are located within the Yangtze’s middle reaches, whilst
the lower reaches contain the Lower Yangtze River
Lakes and a number of large lakes in southern Jiangsu:
Hongze Hu, Gaoyou Hu, Shaobo Hu and Tai Hu
(Scott 1989).
Poyang Hu is located in the north of Jiangxi
province. At the height of the wet season (April to
September, with most rainfall from June to August),
the lake has a surface area of about 3,600 km2, being
about 170 km long and 90 km wide. At this time the
lake surface is at an altitude of c.21 m, but this
decreases to 13 m during the dry season (October to
March) when the lake has a fragmented area of about
500 km2 (Scott 1989). Dongting Hu, in north-eastern
Hunan province, has an area of 2,700 km2. The average
water level difference between dry and wet seasons is
18 m. Reclamation and siltation have resulted in the
formation of three lakes, i.e. West, South and East
Dongting. The Wuhan Lakes consist of about 40 lakes,
each of over 250 ha in area, whilst the Lower Yangtze
River Lakes contain about 80 lakes, each greater than
250 ha in extent, and innumerable smaller lakes and
ponds with a network of interconnecting channels
(Scott 1989).
Survey techniques
The survey was carried out in late January and early
February. This period was chosen because this is when
waterbird numbers in the region should be at a
maximum (owing to birds being forced south by cold
winter weather in northern China) and birds were
expected to be occupying their preferred habitats,
owing to greatly reduced human disturbance during
the period of the Spring Festival.
The counts were conducted by 14 teams: two teams
in each of Shanghai municipality and Jiangsu, Anhui,
Hubei and Hunan provinces, and four teams in Jiangxi
province. Gaining access to wetlands in the floodplain
was often difficult and time consuming. In many cases
it was necessary to walk long distances to reach the
shoreline and then along the shore to count birds.
Daily walks of 15-20 km were commonplace. Teams
used a variety of methods to gain access to the
wetlands and the waterbirds, but in most cases cars
were employed to get as close as possible to the target
area and teams then proceeded on foot.
The waterbird species that were counted were those
listed in Wetlands International (2002), i.e. those used
by the Ramsar Convention for identifying wetlands
containing internationally important concentrations of
waterbirds. Those species that could be reasonably
expected to occur in the survey region during the
northern winter were selected from this document and
were listed in the bilingual count forms used during the
survey.
Observers generally underestimate the numbers of
waterbirds present when counting large flocks
(Rappoldt et al. 1985). Underestimation is also
compounded by the common problem of missing birds
when counting over large wetland areas. Double¬
counting of the same bird at more than one site leads
to inflation of estimates, but this is probably normally
outweighed by the underestimation resulting from the
previous two factors. Therefore, it is to be expected
that the counts probably underestimate the numbers of
waterbirds present in the survey region. The overall
coverage of the wetlands visited in Hunan, Hubei,
Anhui, Jiangsu and Shanghai was estimated to be 64%.
Identifying Ramsar sites
The Ramsar Convention has developed two criteria to
determine whether a wetland supports internationally
important numbers of waterbirds (Ramsar Convention
Bureau 2000): (1) a wetland should be considered
internationally important if it regularly supports
20,000 or more waterbirds; and (2) a wetland should
be considered internationally important if it regularly
supports 1% of the individuals in a population of one
species or subspecies of waterbird.
The objective nature of these criteria makes them
easy to apply to the identification of internationally
important waterbird sites. The availability of popula¬
tion estimates for waterbird species occurring in the
lower Yangtze River floodplain during the northern
winter (Wetlands International 2002) means that the
second criterion is the most appropriate one to use in
assessing the international importance of wetlands in
the region. The employment of this criterion has the
significant advantage that it enables identification of
Figure 1 . Location of the sites in the lower Yangtze River
floodplain at which internationally important numbers of at
least one species of waterbird were recorded during the
survey. (1) Beiming Hu; (2) Kongjia Hu; (3) Tabai Hu; (4)
West Dongting Hu; (5) South Dongting Hu; (6) Henling Hu;
(7) East Dongting Hu; (8) Milu/Baijitun NNRs; (9) Chen
Hu; (10) Wang Hu; (11) Saichen Hu; (12) Za Hu; (13)
Xinmiao Hu; (14) Jishan Hu; (15) NW Poyang Hu; (16)
Poyang Hu NNR; (17) SW Poyang Hu; (18) Raopoyangzhu
Hu; (19) Raopoyanglian Hu; (20) Nanjishan; (21)
Wuyuanyuanyang; (22) Longgan Hu; (23) Daguan Hu; (24)
Huang Hu; (25) Bo Hu; (26) Wuchang Hu; (27) Qili Hu;
(28) Shengjin Hu; (29) Cai Zi Hu; (30) Baidang Hu; (31)
Feng Sha; (32) Shang Hu; (33) Chongming Dao.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Survey for waterbirds in the lower Yangtze floodplain, China
3
suites of sites that are important for individual water-
bird species.
RESULTS
Waterbird numbers
A total of 515,896 waterbirds of 82 species was
counted, including 19,101 unidentified waterbirds
(3.7% of the total count). A summary of the total
counts for each species is given in the Appendix.
Waterbirds occurred in large numbers throughout the
survey region. Provincial totals were: Anhui: 171,841
individuals; Jiangxi: 138,643 individuals; Hunan:
133,306 individuals; Hubei: 47,469 individuals;
Jiangsu: 15,796 individuals; and Shanghai municipal¬
ity: 8,841 individuals.
Ducks, geese and swans were the most common
species group, comprising 66% of the waterbirds
counted, followed by shorebirds (17%), gulls (7%),
and egrets and herons (5%). The ten commonest
species were Bean Goose Anser fabalis (79,758 individ¬
uals), Swan Goose (60,886), Dunlin Calidris alpina
(40,709), Common Teal Anas crecca (36,483), Black¬
headed Gull Larus ridibundus (32, 1 14), Tundra Swan
Cygnus columbianus (30,925), Greater White-fronted
Goose Anser albifrons (25,241), Spot-billed Duck Anas
poecilorhyncha (22,562), Falcated Duck Anas falcata
(18,364) and Lesser White-fronted Goose (16,937).
These ten species comprised 70% of the total water-
bird count.
Table 1. Waterbird species ranked according to the number of sites
in the lower Yangtze floodplain at which they were recorded in
internationally important numbers.
Species No. sites of international importance
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia 1 1
Black Stork Ciconia nigra 1 0
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus 10
Bean Goose Anser fabalis 8
Swan Goose Anser cygnoides 7
Hooded Crane Grus monacha 6
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus 5
Falcated Duck Anas falcata 5
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta 4
Common Crane Grus grus 4
Oriental Stork Ciconia boyciana 3
Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus 3
White-naped Crane Grus vipio 3
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus 3
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 3
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus 2
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo 1
Great Egret Casmerodius albus 1
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax 1
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus 1
Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata 1
Common Teal Anas crecca 1
Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus 1
Twelve globally threatened species (Oriental Stork,
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor , Swan Goose,
Lesser White-fronted Goose, Baikal Teal, Baer’s
Pochard, Scaly-sided Merganser, Siberian Crane,
White-naped Crane, Hooded Crane, Swinhoe’s Crake
Coturnicops exquisitus and Saunders’s Gull Larus
saundersi) and one Near Threatened species
(Ferruginous Pochard Aythya nyroca) were encoun¬
tered.
Species present in important concentrations
The great importance of the lower Yangtze River flood-
plain is shown by the fact that it supports very high
proportions of the populations of six globally threat¬
ened species: Oriental Stork (57% of the estimated
global population), Swan Goose (60,886 individuals,
which exceeds the current global population estimate
of 55,000 individuals), Lesser White-fronted Goose
(16,937 individuals, which exceeds the current flyway
population estimate of 14,000 individuals), Siberian
Crane (93% of the estimated flyway population),
White-naped Crane (68% of the estimated flyway
population), and Hooded Crane (93% of the estimated
flyway population). In addition, we found very high
proportions of the flyway populations for four other
species: Black Stork Ciconia nigra (108 individuals,
which exceeds the current flyway population estimate
of 100 individuals), Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea
leucorodia (89% of the estimated flyway population);
Tundra Swan (36% of the estimated flyway popula¬
tion), and Falcated Duck (53% of the estimated global
population).
Twenty-three species were found to be present in
internationally important numbers at one or more sites
(Table 1). Eurasian Spoonbill, Black Stork, Tundra
Swan, Bean Goose, Swan Goose and Hooded Crane
all occurred in internationally important numbers at
more than five sites. Table 2 gives an indication of the
degree to which the global or flyway populations of
different species are concentrated in the lower Yangtze
River floodplain. Of particular conservation signifi¬
cance is the fact that six globally threatened species
occur at one or more sites in numbers exceeding 20%
of their estimated global or flyway populations.
Sites of international importance
A total of 33 sites were identified at which at least one
waterbird species was recorded in internationally
important numbers (Table 3, Fig. 1). Four sites
supported more than five such species: Poyang Hu
NNR, East Dongting Hu, Nanjishan and Shengjin Hu.
Many sites supported high percentages of a species’s
flyway population: 19 sites supported at least one
species in numbers exceeding 5% of its global or flyway
population (Table 2). Some sites supported a number
of such species, with Poyang Hu NNR (eight species
>5%), Shengjin Hu (five species), East Dongting Hu
(four species), Nanjishan (three species) and Cai Zi
Hu (three species) holding the most. These sites are
obviously of great conservation significance.
Three extremely important regions within the lower
Yangtze River floodplain were identified during this
survey: (1) Poyang Hu; (2) Dongting Hu; and (3)
Shengjin Hu and the lakes of the Anqing Yangtze River
Wetland Provincial Nature Reserve.
4
MARK BARTER et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Table 2. Species occurring in concentrations >20%, >10% and >5% of their estimated global or flyway population, and the sites at which
they occur.
DISCUSSION
The great importance of the wetlands within the lower
Yangtze River floodplain is confirmed by the count of
more than 0.5 million waterbirds of 82 species, of
which 23 were present in internationally important
concentrations at one or more sites. The occurrence of
very high proportions of the populations of six globally
threatened species is of particular conservation impor¬
tance, especially as four of these (Oriental Stork,
Lesser White-fronted Goose, Siberian Crane and
White-naped Crane) are concentrated in significant
numbers at only a few sites. There are undoubtedly
many more internationally important sites within the
floodplain. Some have been previously identified, e.g.
Hongze Hu, Shaobo Hu and Gaoyou Hu in Jiangsu
(frozen during the survey) and Shijiu Hu in Anhui
(unvisited), and more will be identified as survey
coverage improves.
The number of waterbirds present within the lower
Yangtze River floodplain during the survey period is
likely to have been considerably higher than that
counted, as it is estimated that only about 64% of the
total area of wetlands visited was covered. Additionally,
as noted previously, counts generally underestimate
numbers actually present.
The wetlands of the lower Yangtze River floodplain
have been much reduced and degraded by economic
activities, principally reclamation for agriculture. The
total area of lakes is reported to have declined by 62%
between the 1950s and 1980s. More than 1,100 lakes
have been totally reclaimed, notably in Hubei province
where numbers have decreased from 1,066 to 83 lakes
over the 1950-1980 period. The surface area of Poyang
Hu has been reduced from 5,000 knf to 3,600 km2
and of Dongting Hu from 4,350 km2 to 2,700 km2.
Although the total area of wetlands is still large, their
quality has been greatly affected by development,
pollution, overfishing, crab farming, fish farming using
fertilisers, planting of poplars and human disturbance;
waterbirds are concentrated in the remaining suitable
areas of shallow wetland during the non-breeding
season (BirdLife International 2003, personal observa¬
tions)
The construction and operation of the Three
Gorges Dam, which commenced filling in mid-2003,
will change the seasonal flow of water in the Yangtze
River and could negatively affect the wetlands
downstream. There is a danger that by artificially
maintaining low water levels during the summer flood
season and raising them in the winter (to a level
estimated to be 1 m higher) the character of the
Forktail 21 (2005)
Survey for waterbirds in the lower Yangtze floodplain, China
5
wetlands will be changed, and the shallow areas that
most waterbirds require for feeding will be greatly
reduced in extent (BirdLife International 2003).
Implementation of the South-North Water Transfer
project, which plans to draw 48 billion m3 from the
Yangtze River watershed and send it via three canals to
arid areas of northern China, can also be expected to
affect water supply to wetlands in the region.
Construction of two of the canals began in 2002-2003.
The numbers of waterfowl in the lower Yangtze
River floodplain have declined greatly in the last ten
years (BirdLife International 2003). Recent informa¬
tion, based on data from the breeding areas, indicates
that habitat loss and hunting in the staging and non¬
breeding regions (e.g. the lower Yangtze River
floodplain) have caused significant declines in the
numbers of waterbirds breeding in the Russian Far
East. Over recent decades, all geese populations have
declined by more than 80%; ten out of 13 migratory
populations of dabbling ducks and six of the 14
populations of diving ducks have also decreased (E.
Syrechkovski Jr. in litt. 2004). A study of hunting
pressure in the lower Yangtze River floodplain in
Table 3. Sites in the lower Yangtze floodplain ranked according to
the number of internationally important waterbird species’ popula¬
tions supported.
1987-1992 estimated that c.50% of the total wintering
waterfowl in this region were killed each year by local
hunters, using netting, shooting and poisoning.
Hunting appears to be the main reason for recent
decreases in the numbers of Swan Goose and the
eastern population of Lesser White-fronted Goose
(BirdLife International 2003).
These declines indicate that it is very important to
establish a programme to monitor waterbird numbers
within the lower Yangtze River floodplain. A statistically
robust sampling scheme will be required as it is
impractical to count waterbirds at all the wetlands in
the region over a short time period on an annual basis.
In order to set up such a programme, more informa¬
tion will be required on the abundance and
distribution of those species for which the region is
important. It will firstly be necessary to cover those
areas missed during this survey. However, as species
distributions can be expected to change from year to
year with varying water levels, either naturally occur¬
ring or due to the impact of the Three Gorges dam, it
will be highly desirable to revisit some of the particu¬
larly important areas identified in this survey in order
to assess the extent and degree of annual variation in
distribution.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for the survey was provided by WWF Netherlands. We are
very grateful to the State Forestry Administration, the Provincial
Forestry Bureaus, Nature Reserve staff and the members of the
counting teams for their assistance in the planning and execution of
the project.
REFERENCES
Anon. (1994) Waterbird research in China. Shanghai, China: East
China Normal University Press.
Anon. (1999a) Waterbird count in Poyang Lake in 1996 and 1998.
Newsl. for Wetlands 4: 9.
Anon. (1999b) Preliminary investigation on wintering waterbirds in
Liangzi Lake, 1999. Newsl. for Wetlands 4: 14.
Anon. (2001) Saichen Hu Lake - the important wetland in northern
Jiangxi Province. Newsl. for Wetlands 7:11.
BirdLife International (2003) Saving Asia’s threatened birds: a guide
for government and civil society. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Lopez, A. and Mundkur, T., eds. (1997) The Asian Waterfowl census
1994-1996: results of the coordinated waterbird census and an
overview of the status of wetlands in Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Wetlands
International.
Perennou, C., Mundkur, T., Scott, D. A., Follestad, A. and Kvelnid,
L. (1994) The Asian Waterfowl Census 1987-91: distribution and
status of Asian waterfowl. Kuala Lumpur and Slimbridge, U.K.:
AWB and IWRB.
Ramsar Convention Bureau (2000) Strategic framework and guide¬
lines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of
International Importance. Available at: www.ramsar.org/
key guide list e.htm.
Rappoldt, C., Kersten, M. and Smit, C. (1985) Errors in large-scale
shorebird counts. Ardea 73: 13-24.
Scott, D. A., ed. (1989) A directory of Asian wetlands. Gland,
Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.: IUCN.
Wetlands International (2002) Waterbird population estimates. Third
Edition. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wetlands International.
6
MARK BARTER et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Mark Barter, 21 Chivalry Avenue, Glen Waverley,VIC 3150, Australia. Email: markbarter@optusnet.com.au
Lei Cao, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96 Jin Zai Road, Hefei 230026,
Anhui, China.
Liwei Chen, WWF China Programme, Room 1609, Wen Hua Gong, Beijing Working People’s Culture Palace, Beijing
100006, China.
Gang Lei, WWF China Programme, Room 901, Changsheng Building, No. 126 Jianghan Road, Wuhan 430014,
Hubei, China.
APPENDIX
Number of waterbirds counted in the lower Yangtze River floodplain, Jan-Feb 2004
Forktail 21 (2005)
Survey for waterbirds in the lower Yangtze floodplain, China
7
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 9-14
The status and distribution of Spot-billed Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis in southern India
V. KANNAN and RANJIT MANAKADAN
Surveys for Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis were conducted in southern India from May 2000 to April 2004. Population
estimates were based on counts of birds at nesting colonies and of large congregations at foraging sites, supplemented by published
and unpublished recent records. A population of 2,850-3,700 birds is estimated for the states of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil
Nadu and Kerala, which is higher than earlier estimates.
INTRODUCTION
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis is one of the
most threatened of the seven species of pelicans in the
world. The total population is estimated to number
2,500-5,000 individuals in South Asia, 3,000-5,000
individuals in South-East Asia and <25 individuals in
Sumatra (BirdLife International 2001, Wetlands
International 2002). Populations are declining owing
to factors such as human disturbance at the nesting
grounds, hunting, loss of wetlands, pollution and over¬
fishing (see BirdLife International 2001 and
Manakadan and Kannan 2003 for summaries). A
number of anecdotal accounts, studies and survey
results have been published on the species in India
(e.g., Neelankantan 1949, Gee 1960, Lamba 1963,
Neginhal 1977, Saxena 1980, Nagulu 1983, Nagulu
and Rao 1983, Perennou and Santharam 1990,
Perennou and Mundkur 1992, Johnson et al. 1993,
Krishnan 1993, Riyazuddin 1994, Perennou et al.
1994, Sridhar and Chakravarthy 1995, Subramanya
1996a,b, Subramanya and Manu 1996, Manu and
Jolly 2000). We undertook specific surveys for the
species in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,
and Karnataka in southern India. As there are few
records of Spot-billed Pelican in Kerala (Ferguson and
Bourdillon 1903-1904, Nameer 1993, Nair 1994,
Ravindran 1995), and these probably refer to stragglers
from Tamil Nadu, we did not carry out surveys in this
state.
METHODS
A base camp was established in the Pulicat Lake-
Nelapattu area of Andhra Pradesh from May 2000 to
April 2003, where regular censuses were carried out.
During 2002-2004, surveys were carried out at other
sites in southern India, mainly during the breeding
season (October-April). These sites were chosen based
on published localities, and information gathered from
forest department personnel, birdwatchers, ornitholo¬
gists, and local people. A total of 37 sites were visited
during the survey, of which 14 were breeding colonies
(either regular or occasional), four were former
breeding colonies, and the remainder were foraging
sites. Data on Karavetti-Vettakudi, Coringa, Watrup,
Kaliveli-Yedayanthittu and Labaku-Reddipalle were
based solely on secondary sources. Single counts were
made at foraging sites, but 3-4 counts were made at
each nesting colony, and the maximum number was
used in the analysis. In some cases the survey data were
supplemented with secondary information obtained
from forest department records, local people and
birdwatchers. All counts were carried out rapidly from
watchtowers, vehicles, or on foot, to reduce the
chances of double counting. Counts at foraging sites
were generally carried out from 07h00 to 09h00, while
those at colonies were carried out between 1 lhOO and
14h00 when most of the adults would have returned
from the foraging grounds. It was not always possible
to count the number of nests owing to dense vegetation
obstructing views. Juveniles were easily distinguished
from adults by their brownish rather than whitish
plumage. We found it difficult to differentiate sub¬
adults as their brownish-tinged plumage varied
considerably in different light conditions, and hence
we did not count them separately.
RESULTS
The Appendix summarises the records at each site, and
sites are mapped in Figs. 1-3. From these data, we
estimate the population of Spot-billed Pelican in
southern India to be 2,850-3,700 individuals. There
are three relatively stable large breeding colonies in
Andhra Pradesh (Telineelapuram, Uppalapadu and
Nelapattu) and one each in Karnataka (Kokkare-
Bellur) and Tamil Nadu (Koonthakulam).
Andhra Pradesh
There are probably three subpopulations in Andhra
Pradesh (extending into the neighbouring states of
Orissa and Tamil Nadu) and numbering 850-1,200
individuals in total.
(1) At Telineelapuram, Srikakulam district, the
breeding population numbers c.100 individuals. The
birds forage at Kakarpally Creek (100 krm, c.10 km
away), but the major foraging grounds may be at
Chilka Lake, Orissa (856 km2, c.100 km away). The
total population at Chilka was c.250 birds in 1993
(Balachandran et al. 2002) and 130 birds in 2004 (S.
Balachandran verbally 2004).
(2) Another subpopulation probably comprises the
remnants of the colony at Kolleru, where both the
nesting habitats (at Aredu, Sarepalle and Kolamuru)
and the major foraging area at Kolleru Lake have been
destroyed or are heavily disturbed. Birds from here
may have been the source of a new colony established
at Uppalapadu, c.75 km away, in 1999-2000. Other
birds from Kolleru may be currently breeding
10
V. KANNAN and RANJIT MANAKADAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
Yellamallappa Shetty Tank
Kokkare-Bellur \ Bo|are Koppa|U
Karanji \ \ \
\ \ Dalawaikere
A\ \ / Jailur
MaduA )•/ ' |
„ Sulekere* %/^Malavalli \
Belikere ® , • . , )
• a a # • • M anda ka 1 1 y
Hadinaru Lake ® « $ ^
‘^-v Ynaehole#® Doddagubbi
Ularasambud" ! MarcMi /
▲ Breeding site
• Foraging site
& Occasional breeding site
Figure 2. Breeding colonies and foraging sites for Spot-billed
Pelican in Karnataka.
Figure 3. Breeding colonies and foraging sites for Spot-billed
Pelican in Tamil Nadu.
Forktail 21 (2005)
The status and distribution of Spot-billed Pelican in southern India
1 1
elsewhere in the Krishna-Godavari deltas, which form
the major foraging grounds. We estimate the current
population in this region to be 200-300 birds, a huge
decline from the estimated 3,000 birds at Kolleru in
the middle of the twentieth century (Neelakantan
1949, Gee 1960, Lamba 1963).
(3) A third subpopulation, numbering 500-600
birds, breeds at Nelapattu, Nellore district, and forages
at the nearby Pulicat Lake (c.460 km2), and also at
numerous irrigation tanks in the district, e.g. Kanigiri
Reservoir near Nellore. These birds may forage or even
occasionally breed in areas such as Vedanthangal Bird
Sanctuary (Chengleput ciistrict, Tamil Nadu), about
150 km to the south. They may also forage and
occasionally breed at Kaliveli-Yedayanthittu (near
Pondicherry), Vedurupattu-Edhirpattu (near
Nelapattu), and Edayur (Kanchipuram district, Tamil
Nadu).
Karnataka
The subpopulation in Karnataka, formerly concen¬
trated at the adjacent villages of Kokkare, Bellur and
Bannali, Mandya district, has now spread to form
breeding colonies at Ivaranji, Kukkrahalli and
Lingabuddi in the adjoining district of Mysore. It is
difficult to estimate the size of this subpopulation, but
it probably numbers c. 350-450 birds. Pelicans seen
occasionally in Erode and Coimbatore districts in
Tamil Nadu probably derive from this subpopulation.
Tamil Nadu
Spot-billed Pelican is widely distributed in Tamil
Nadu, making it difficult to identify subpopulations or
estimate numbers, but the state probably supports
1,600-2,000 birds. The largest colony is at
Koonthakulam, Tirunelveli district, with c.450 individ¬
uals, having grown from just 30 nests in 1982 (V. J.
Rajan in litt. to BirdLife International 2001). A smaller
colony formerly existed at Moondradaippu, c.60 km
away, but was abandoned in the early 1980s. There are
also isolated breeding records at a few sites around
Koonthakulam and Moondradaippu (see Appendix),
and records of 25-40 pairs at Sakarakottai and
Ramnad tanks, Ramanathapuram district. All these
birds probably originated from the Chitrangudi-
Kanjirankulam colony, Ramanathapuram district
(c.50 km from Sakarakottai and Ramnad and c.200
km from Koonthakulam), which was abandoned in
the 1990s having supported c. 1,000 birds formerly.
Pelicans reported from Theroor, Vembanur and
Suchindram, Kanniyakumari district, presumably
derive from Tirunelveli. Those reported from Madurai
Tank and Virudunagar district (Vembakottai Dam,
Kulur Sandai Dam and Watrup Big Tank) may derive
from Ramanathapuram. However, there could be
mixing between both these sources. The origin of
pelicans seen during October-February in the Great
Vedaranyam Swamp is uncertain (see Appendix). They
may originate in Sri Lanka, which is just 50 km away,
or from the Ramanathapuram population.
Since the mid-1990s, small numbers of pelican
nests have been reported at Karaivetti-Vettakudi tank
(Perambalur district). Counts did not exceed 42 birds
until 200-450 birds were recorded from January to
June 2003 (see Appendix). The origin of this new
population can only be a matter of conjecture.
DISCUSSION
The status of the Spot-billed Pelican in southern India
(and indeed in the rest of its range) is poorly known. It
was previously believed to be sedentary or subject to
local seasonal movements, and it was presumed not to
undertake long-distance movements regularly (Ali and
Ripley 1987, del Hoyo et al. 1992). However, we
suggest that the species may travel long distances to
foraging grounds and there may also be movements
between colonies. Movements up to 75 km (Findholt
and Anderson 1995) and 100 km (Hatzilacou 1996)
from colonies to foraging areas have been reported in
the American White Pelican P erythrorhynchos and
Great White Pelican P. onocrotalus respectively.
In India, populations were estimated to number
c. 1,000-1,500 birds in the 1980s (Nagulu 1983).
However, results of the yearly Asian Waterfowl Census
conducted by Wetlands International since the late
1980s have shown the species to be more abundant
(Perennou and Mundkur 1992, Johnson et al. 1993,
Mundkur and Taylor 1993, Mundkur 1994, Perennou
et al. 1994). In 2001, 2,000-2,500 birds were estimated
for southern India (BirdLife International 2001). Our
surveys produced an estimate of 2,850-3,700 birds.
With a recent estimate of c.3,000 birds for Assam
(Choudhury 2000), the population in India totals
6,000-7,000 birds. It is unclear whether any genuine
population increase has occurred, or whether censuses
have become more comprehensive. Local people in
India may have become more wary of hunting wildlife
since the 1980s owing to improved awareness and
stricter enforcement of wildlife laws. Additionally, a
number of colonies have been given protection by state
forest departments since the late 1980s and 1990s.
However, we foresee population declines in future
owing to the multitude of human-related pressures on
pelicans, especially at the foraging grounds (see
Manakadan and Kannan 2003).
It should be noted that our estimates are crude as
they were based on very few visits to sites, conducted
at different times, and also relied on secondary infor¬
mation. Systematic, repeated and standardised counts
at both breeding and foraging sites and monitoring of
marked birds (e.g. with the help of satellite tracking)
are needed to determine more accurately the popula¬
tion, distribution and movements of the Spot-billed
Pelican in southern India.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of
India for funding. The 2003-2004 survey was funded by the IBA
Programme of the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), and we
thank Dr A. R. Rahmani and Zafar-ul-Islam for support. We thank the
officials and staff of the forest departments of Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka and Tamil Nadu for permission or help in carrying out
studies in their states. Earlier drafts were improved by J. C. Daniel, Ajay
A. Desai, S. Sivakumar and Dr G. Maheshwaran. Many of the staff at
BNHS helped us during the project, and we are grateful to them.
12
V. KANNAN and RANJ1T MANAKADAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Anon. (1993) Directory of Indian wetlands. New Delhi: WWF-India.
Balachandran, S, Barua, A. D. Shanbhag, A. B. and Borges, S. (in
press) Large congregation of Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philip-
pensis at Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary and a tank in
Tirunelveli. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
Balachandran, S, Rahmani, A. R. and Sathiyaselvam, P. (2002)
Habitat evaluation of Chilika Lake with special reference to birds as
bio-indicators. Interim report (December 2001— June 2002).
Mumbai: Bombay Natural History Society.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Choudhury, A. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati: Gibbon Books
and Worldwide Fund for Nature-India.
Ferguson, H. S, and Bourdillon, T. F. (1903-1904) The birds of
Travancore with notes on their nidification. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 15: 249-264, 455-474, 654-673; 16: 1-8.
Findholt, S. L, and Anderson, S. H. (1995) Foraging areas and
feeding habitat selection of American White Pelicans ( Pelecanus
erythrorhynchos ) nesting at Pathfinder Reservoir, Wyoming.
Colonial Waterbirds 18(1): 47-57.
Gee, E. P. (1960) The breeding of the Grey or Spotted billed Pelican,
Pelecanus philippensis Gmelin. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 57:
245-251.
Guttikar, S. N. (1978) Lost pelicanry. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 75:
482-484.
Hatzilacou, D. (1996) Feeding ecology of the Great White Pelican
(. Pelecanus onocrotalus ) nesting at Lake Mikri Prespa (northern
Greece) Colonial Waterbirds 19: 190-206.
del Hoyo, J, Elliot, A. and Sargatal, J. (1992) Handbook of the birds of
the world. Vol. 1. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Johnson, J, M., Perennou, C. and Crivelli, A. (1993) Towards the
extinction of the Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis. Pp.
92-94 in M. Moser and J. van Vessem, eds. Wetland and waterfowl
conservation in south and west Asia. IWRB Spec. Publ. no. 25,
AWB Publ. no. 85. Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl
and Wetlands Research Bureau.
Krishnan, M. (1993) The Aredu pelicanry: a factual rejoinder.
Blackbuck 9(2): 44-46.
Lamba, B. S. (1963) Nidification of some common Indian birds.
No.7.The Spottedbilled or Grey Pelican. Pavo 1: 1 10-1 19.
Manakadan, R. and Kannan, V. (2003) A study of Spot-billed Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis with special reference to its conservation in
southern India. Final Report. Mumbai: Bombay Natural History
Society.
Manu, K. and Jolly, S. (2000) Pelicans and people: the two-tier village
of Kokkare Bellur, Karnataka, India. Community based conservation
in south Asia: Case Study No. 4. Kalpavriksh, India: International
Institute of Environment and Development.
Mundkur,T. (1994) Waterbird studies. Asian Wetland News 7(1): 19.
Mundkur, T. and Taylor, V. (1993) Asian Waterfowl Census 1993.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Slimbridge, U.K.: Asian Wetland
Bureau and International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research
Bureau.
Nagulu, V. (1983) Feeding and breeding biology of Grey Pelican at
Nelapattu Bird Sanctuary in Andhra Pradesh, India. Ph.D.
thesis. Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.
Nagulu, V. and Rao, J. V. R. (1983) Survey of south Indian pelican-
ries. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 80: 141-143.
Nair, M.V. (1994) Birds of Aakkulam-Veli backwaters and environs.
Newsletter for Birdwatchers 34: 12-16.
Nameer, P. O. (1993) Birds of Kole wetlands: survey report II. Trichur,
Kerala: Nature Education Society, Forest Research Institute and
Kerala Forest Department.
Neelakantan, K. K. (1949) A south Indian pelicanry. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 48: 656-666.
Neginhal, S. G. (1977) Discovery of a pelicanry in Karnataka. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 74: 169-170.
Perennou, C. and Mundkur, T. (1992) Asian Waterfowl Census 1992.
Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands
Research Bureau.
Perennou, C. and Santharam, V. (1990) An ornithological survey of
some wetlands in south-east India. Wetlands and Waterfowl
Newsletter 2: 26-35.
Perennou, C., Mundkur, T., Scott, D. A, Follestad, A. and Kvenild,
L. (1994) The Asian Waterfowl Census: 1987-91. AWB Publ.
no.86. IWRB Publ. no. 24. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and
Slimbridge, U.K.: Asian Wetland Bureau and International
Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau.
Rama, M.V. (1996) Belikere Lake: a new foraging site for Spotbilled
Pelicans ( Pelecanus philippensis) . Newsletter for Birdwatchers 36(6):
110-111.
Ramakrishnan, C. (1990) Vedurupattu: Painted Stork Mycteria leuco-
cephala nesting place. Mayura. 7-8: 34-35.
Ravindran, P. K. (1995) The Kole wetlands: an avian paradise in
Kerala. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 35: 2-5.
Riyazuddin, S. (1994) Grey Pelican Pelecanus philippensis'. overview of
an endangered bird. Mayura (11): 39-44.
Santharam, V. (1998) An evening at Vedurupattu. Blackbuck 14:
9-13.
Sathasivam, K. (1997) Notes from Madurai: pelicans, bee-eaters and
peafowl. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 37(5): 86.
Saxena,V. S. (1980) Kokkare Bellur pelicanry. Cheetal (4): 20-24.
Sharma, P. K. and Raghavaiah, P. S. (2002) Effect of rainfall on Grey
Pelican ( Pelecanus philippensis) arriving and breeding at
Nelapattu Bird Sanctuary, Andhra Pradesh. Indian Forester
128(10): 1101-1105.
Sridhar, S. and Chakravarthy, A. K. (1995) Spotbilled Pelicans and
Painted Storks at Kokkare-Bellur: an update. Newsletter for
Birdwatchers 35(2): inside cover.
Subramanya, S. (1996a) Distribution, status and conservation of
Indian heronries. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 93: 459-486.
Subramanya, S. (1996b) Heronries of Andhra Pradesh. Mayura 13:
1-27.
Subramanya, S. and Manu, K. (1996) Saving the Spot-billed
Pelican: a successful experiment. Hornbill 2: 2-6.
Sudhakaran, R, Muthukumaran, A. P. Shenbagaraj, S. Murali, S. and
Mohandoss, A. (1993) Avifauna of Vembakkottai reservoir: a
field checklist. Pp. 18-19 in A. Verghese, S. Sridhar and A. K.
Chakaravarthy, eds. Bird conservation: strategies for the nineties and
beyond. Bangalore, India: Ornithological Society of India.
Venkataraman, C. (1996) Human disturbance: a major factor for
nest desertion. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 36: 33-34.
Wetlands International (2002) Waterbird population estimates. Third
edition. Wetlands International Global Series no. 12.
Wageningen, Netherlands: Wetlands International.
V. Kannan and Ranjit Manakadan, Bombay Natural History Society, Museum Compound, Salim Ali Chowk, Shaheed
Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai 400 002, India. Email: vaikan@rediffmail.com and ransan5@rediffmail.com
Forktail 21 (2005)
The status and distribution of Spot-billed Pelican in southern India
13
14
V. KANNAN and RANJ1T MANAKADAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
B = Breeding colony; OB = Occasional breeding colony; AB = Abandoned breeding colony; UB = Unconfirmed breeding colony; F = Foraging site.
Recent (post- 1990) records are given in the ‘Secondary information’ column where these exceed the numbers we recorded, or for sites we did not visit.
See BirdLife International (2001) for detailed documentation of all known sites.
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 15-26
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
A total of 374 species has been recorded from Nameri National Park, Assam, north-east India, based on fieldwork carried out in
1996-2003 and records by other observers. This includes eight globally threatened species (White-winged Duck Cairina scutulata,
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis, Pallas’s Fish Eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus , White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis, Slender-
billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris. Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga. Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius and Jerdon’s Babbler
Chrysomma altirostre ), and five Near Threatened species (White-cheeked Partridge Arborophila atrogularis, Black-bellied Tern Sterna
acuticauda, White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla, Lesser Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis and Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus).
INTRODUCTION
Nameri National Park (26°50'-27°02'N 92°38'-
93°00'E) covers an area of 200 km2 in the foothills of
the eastern Himalayas in Assam, north-east India. It is
contiguous with Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary in
Arunachal Pradesh to the north, and together they
exceed 1,000 km2 and range from 79 m to over 1,500
m.The Jia Bhareli river flows along the park’s western
and southern boundaries and the Bor Dikrai river
forms the eastern boundary (Fig. 1). The terrain is
undulating, with lower areas at 80-100 m along the Jia
Bhorelli and its tributaries, and higher areas at
200-225 m in the central and northern parts of the
park. Soils are characterised by sandy or sandy loam
alluvial deposits. Numerous small rivers and perennial
streams originating in Arunachal Pradesh run through
the park and feed into the Jia Bhareli. Many rivers shift
their course during the rainy season and form dry
riverbeds during the winter.
Forest and woodland cover the majority of the park
(94%, 188 km2). Grasslands are found along the banks
of the Jia Bhareli River and its tributaries and cover an
area of 10 km2 (5%). The remaining 2 km2 (1%) is
formed by various riverbeds. The vegetation of the park
is a mosaic of four major forest types (following
Champion and Seth 1968): (1) Eastern alluvial
secondary semi-evergreen forest (including
Pterospermum acerifolium, Dillenia indica , Dysoxylum
procerum, Bombax ceiba, Bischofia javanica, Artocarpus
chaplasha , Duabanga sonneratoides and Litsea sebifera);
(2) Low alluvial savannah woodland (including
Bombax ceiba, Albizzia procera , Dillenia indica, Cordia
dichotoma, Premna bengalensis and Trewia nudiflora trees
Figure 1. Map of Nameri National Park, Assam.
16
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
with very dense tall grass including Saccharum spp. and
Erianthus spp.); (3) Eastern Dillenia swamp forest
(including Dillenia indica , Bischofia javanica, Albizzia
lucida, Lagerstroemia flos-reginae and Terminalia
chebula); and (4) Wet bamboo forest (usually found
along streams or on badly drained hollows), with areas
of cane brakes formed by Calamus tenuis.
The subtropical monsoon climate of the region is
characterised by heavy rainfall with an annual average
of 3,500 mm. Most of the rain falls between May and
September, which forms the summer (hot) season.
Winters (October to April) are usually cool and dry,
although rains are not uncommon. The average
temperature in the area varies from a low of 5°C in
winter to a high of 37°C in summer. The relative
humidity is high, and varies between 65% and 90% or
more.
Parts of the area were declared as Nauduar Reserve
Forest in 1876 and Nameri Wildlife Sanctuary in 1985.
The present Nameri National Park was formed in
1988. Considerable commercial timber exploitation
and intensive extraction of canebrakes has taken place,
and habitat has been further degraded through
livestock grazing. In recent years, cattle camps have
been evicted to reduce grazing pressure, resulting in
grassland regeneration in these areas. A belt of
Reserved Forests contiguous to the park form a buffer,
but this is now being encroached by people for
homesteads and cultivation. This has resulted in
further fragmentation of the park, which in turn is
becoming progressively insular.
METHODS
Like most areas in north-east India, Nameri has been
poorly surveyed for birds. No published checklist of the
birds of the park exists, although there is some litera¬
ture relating to birds in the neighbouring Pakhui
Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh (Datta et al.
1998, Singh 1991, 1994). We carried out fieldwork in
most areas in Nameri during all seasons from 1996 to
September 2003, although less intensively prior to
1998. Here we report on the species we recorded, and
combine them with records (excluding those we
consider doubtful) from Nameri listed in Talukdar
(1997), Talukdar and Das (1997), Dymond (1998),
Hendriks (1998), and Barua and Sharma (1999).
IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife International
(2004).
RESULTS
A total of 374 species have been recorded from Nameri
(see Appendix). These include nine globally threatened
species (two Critically Endangered, one Endangered
and five Vulnerable species) and five Near Threatened
species, many of which are dependent on forest. The
park does not appear to harbour any of the globally
threatened grassland species that occur in Assam, apart
from Jerdon’s Babbler Chrysomma altirostre, which was
reported in January 2004 (Robson 2004). Rahmani et
al. (1990) mentioned that the Bengal Florican
Houbaropsis bengalensis (Endangered) might be found
in the area ‘in due course’ as the grasslands, although
not extensive, were suitable in certain places and were
being given protection. However, we have not detected
this species so far.
NOTES ON SELECTED SPECIES
White-cheeked Partridge Arborophila atrogularis
Near Threatened. This species is an uncommon
resident in dense swamp forest and occasionally in
adjacent secondary forest and open areas.
White-winged Duck Cairina scutulata
Endangered. This resident species inhabits pools and
secluded marshes in dense forest. Although no popula¬
tion estimate has been made, sightings are fairly
regular and breeding occurs: eleven ducklings were
seen on 11 July 1998 with one adult (we did not
observe a second bird, although it is likely that one was
present). Nameri is one of the few areas where this
species has been recorded in Assam outside its main
stronghold in the Dibrugarh and Tinsukia districts,
where a population of c.200 individuals is estimated
(out of a total Indian population of 300-350 individu¬
als: Islam and Rahmani 2002).
Rufous-necked Hornbill Acerns nipalensis
Vulnerable. One bird was observed flying north along
the Upper Dikrai river in primary forest on 18
December 1999. It was readily identified by its tail
pattern (black with a white distal half) and its silent
flight. The species has been recorded at higher altitudes
in neighbouring Arunachal Pradesh (A. Datta verbally
2003, MB personal observation), but it appears to be
extremely rare in Nemeri. The species has disappeared
from much of its range, and currently survives at less
than 20 locations in India (Islam and Rahmani 2002).
Ruddy Kingfisher Halcyon coromanda
Ths is species is a rare resident or breeding visitor in
wooded areas. The only winter record was of one bird
at Potasali on 3 December 1996. Other records were
during summer: three at Potasali on 9 May 1998 and
one at Nameri on 26 June 1998. There have been few
recent records from Assam.
Ibisbill Ibidorhyncha struthersii
Nameri is one of the few places in Assam where this
species has been recorded regularly in winter. It was
recorded between November and May, but more
frequently from February onwards, and was found
along the Jia Bhareli river where there were fast-
flowing rapids, sometimes in groups of up to 12 birds.
Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus
This rare but regular winter migrant was found in
singles or pairs along the Jia Bhareli river and its tribu¬
taries from November to March. Nameri appears to be
the only place in north-east India were this species is
known to winter regularly.
Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda
Near Threatened. This rare species was observed at
Potasali on the Jia Bhareli river (two on 5 February
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
17
1997, two on 2 March 1998 and one on 7 March
1998) amidst groups of River Terns Sterna aurantia.
Breeding has not been observed in the area and the
species’s seasonal status is unclear.
Pallas’s Fish Eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus
Vulnerable. This species breeds along the banks of the
Jia Bhareli river: two traditional nest sites are known:
one at 13dt Mile and the other at the confluence of the
Upper Dikrai and Jia Bhareli rivers. Both were still in
use up to 2002 at least. Other than these two pairs, no
other birds were seen. There are probably fewer than
150 breeding pairs in Assam (Islam and Rahmani
2002).
White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla
Near Threatened. This rare, but regular, winter
migrant was recorded each year between November
and February as singles and occasionally pairs along
the Jia Bhareli river.
Lesser Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis
Near Threatened. This species is rare, and presumably
resident. One was seen soaring over woodland along
the Nameri River on 13 February 2001. Dymond
(1998) recorded one at Potasali on 25-27 November
1998.
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis
Critically Endangered. Between 1996 and 1998, this
species was recorded seven times, usually involving 2-3
birds, mostly seen soaring. There were no subsequent
records. When ten wild elephants Elephas maximus died
in the area due to poisoning during July-August 2001,
no vultures were seen on the carcasses. Their absence
is noteworthy, and presumably related to the
catastrophic decline of Gyps vultures in the Indian
subcontinent owing to diclofenac poisoning (BirdLife
International 2004).
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris
Critically Endangered. This species was rare, with most
records referring to soaring birds. It was not observed
in 1996, but small flocks of up to six birds were seen
4-5 times a year during 1997-2001, mainly between
November and March. None was seen since 2001,
again presumably linked to the decline of Gyps vultures
(BirdLife International 2004).
Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus
Near Threatened. Singles were seen soaring at Potasali
on 16 April 1998 and feeding on a carcass along the
Khari River on 10 July 1998.
Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga
Vulnerable. Small numbers (<10) winter each year
between November and February in open areas along
the Jia Bhareli river and its tributaries.
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
Vulnerable. Small numbers of this species are resident,
mainly in marshes along the Jia Bhareli river. Six nests
were located on a ‘simul’ Bombax ceiba tree near
Bogijuli Nala in the eastern region of the park in
1999-2002.
Yellow-bellied Flowerpecker Dicaeum
melanoxanthum
One bird was observed in primary forest near Bogijuli
on 20 January 1998. This is a species is scarce and local
throughout its range in the Indian subcontinent from
north Uttar Pradesh, central Nepal, east through to
Arunachal Pradesh and the north-east hill states, and
there are no recent published records from Assam.
DISCUSSION
This is the first ornithological survey of Nameri
National Park. Further work should focus on system¬
atic surveys for White-winged Duck in order to
determine the population size of this species in the
reserve. Fragmentation of forests in this region have
led to the park becoming increasingly insular, and
landscape-level studies are needed to investigate the
effect of habitat fragmentation on the park’s avifauna.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the Forest Department of Assam for all their
support. We would like to thank the Chief Conservator of Forests
(Wildlife), Divisional Forest Officer (Somtpur) and all forest staff of
Nameri. We are indebted to B. N.Talukdar, who gave valuable inputs
and went through an earlier draft of the introductory sections;
Rishad Naoroji for his company in the field and help with the
raptors; A. K. Barua and Ranjit Barthakur for their support during
various stages of our work; and other people who helped in various
ways, notably by providing their bird observations: Nick Dymond,
H. Hendriks, John Penhallurick and Mike Waite. We would also like
to thank our families and all staff ofWild Grass for their support.
REFERENCES
Barua, M. and Sharma, P. (1999) Occurrence of the Hill Blue
Flycatcher Cyornis banyumas in Nameri National Park, Assam.
Newsletter for Birdwatchers 39(4): 61-62.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K. (1968) A revised survey of the forest
types of India. New Delhi: Government of India Publications.
Datta, A., Singh, P., Athreya, R. M., and Karthikeyan, S. (1998)
Birds of Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary in western Arunachal
Pradesh, North East India. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 38(6):
91-96.
Dymond, N. (1998) List of birds seen in Nameri National Park:
25-27 November 1998. Unpublished trip report.
Hendriks, H. (1998) Birds seen in northeastern India. Unpublished
trip report.
Islam, M.Z. and Rahmani, A.R. (20029 Threatened birds of India.
Buceros 7: 1-2.
Penhallurick, J. (2001) Birds seen in Assam during April 2001.
Unpublished trip report.
Rahmani, A. R., Narayan, G., Rosalind, L. and Sankaran, R. (1990)
Status of Bengal Florican in India. Pp. 55-78 in Status and
ecology of the Lesser and Bengal Floricans, with reports on Jerdon’s
Courser and Mountain Quail: final report. Mumbai: Bombay
Natural History Society.
Robson, C. (2004) From the field. BirdingASIA 1: 78-87.
Singh, P. (1991) Avian and mammalian evidences in Pakhui Wildlife
Sanctuary in East Kameng district, Arunachal Pradesh.
Arunachal Forest News 9(2): 1-10.
Singh, P. (1994) Recent bird records from Arunachal Pradesh.
Forktail 10: 65-104.
18
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
Talukdar, B. K. (1997) Record of largest flock of Great Cormorant Talukdar, B. K. and Das, R. K. (1997) Record of birds of prey in
in Nameri Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam. Newsletter for Birdwatchers Named Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam. Newsletter for Birdwatchers
37(4): 65. 37(3): 50-51.
Maan Barua,Wild Grass, Kaziranga 785109, Assam, India. Correspondence: Barua Bhavan, 107 MC Road, Uzan
Bazaar, Guwahati 781001, Assam, India. Email: maan_barua@yahoo.com
Pankaj Sharma, Nameri National Park, PO Potasali, District Sonitpur, Assam, India.
APPENDIX
Checklist of birds recorded in Nameri National Park
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
19
20
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
Rare resident. Singles at Khari on 7 February 1997 (and
30 November 2001: R. Naoroji w litt. 2004) and Potasali on
16 April 1998.
Jerdon's Baza Aviceda jerdoni
P
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
21
indicating that part of the population is migratory. A ring
(probably Chinese) was recovered on a bird found along the
Upper Dikrai river by the Arunachal Pradesh Forest Department.
Large flocks of 400-500 birds seen regularly in winter along the
Jia Bhareli river.
22
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
23
24
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds of Nameri National Park, Assam, India
25
26
MAAN BARUA and PANKAJ SHARMA
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
CR = Critically Endangered.
EN = Endangered.
VU = Vulnerable.
NT = Near Threatened.
P = Primary forest (relatively intact, with a closed canopy that has remained undisturbed and unmodified by human activity).
S = Secondary forest (with an open canopy regenerating naturally after human and/or natural disturbance).
G = Grasslands (various serai stages of riverine grasslands including short grass on sandy islets through to areas being colonised by trees).
W = Waterbodies (stagnant pools, marshes etc.).
R = Rivers and streams.
D = Disturbed areas (cultivation, settlements etc. in the fringe areas of the park).
A = Aerial.
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 27-32
Effectiveness of road transects and wetland visits
for surveying Black-necked Storks
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus and Sarus Cranes
Grus antigone in India
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
I surveyed Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus and Sarus Cranes Grus antigone in Etawah and Mainpuri districts, Uttar
Pradesh, India, by carrying out counts at five wetlands and along a 105-km road transect each month from December 2000 to
February 2002. The results were compared to the known population sizes in the area as determined from spot-mapping of territories.
On average, road transects detected 17.9% of Black-necked Storks and 35% of territorial Sarus Crane pairs. Densities and encounter
rates from road transect data correlated with known numbers of Black-necked Storks. For Black-necked Storks, pairs were more likely
to be detected than families, whereas the converse was true for Sarus Cranes. Wetland sites held only 20.5% of Black-necked Storks
and 8.9% of territorial Sarus Crane pairs (although wetlands held 65% of non-breeding cranes). Consequently, wetland counts alone
were not found to be effective for surveying these two species. On average, they recorded only 1.3% of all Black-necked Stork pairs.
Too few Sarus Crane pairs were reliably identifiable in wetlands to determine their sighting probability. Road transects that pass
wetland sites and that are carried out in late winter will provide the most accurate data for both species.
INTRODUCTION
Developing suitable methods to estimate population
sizes and monitor numbers of rare or declining species
is an important priority in addition to direct interven¬
tions to improve the conservation status of such
species. In India, waterbirds are presently censused as
part of the Asian Waterfowl Census (AWC), in which
volunteers count birds at wetlands known to be impor¬
tant as wintering sites for migrating waterfowl. These
counts provide estimates of local abundance for both
migratory and resident species (Perennou et al. 1994,
Lopez and Mundkur 1997, Li and Mundkur 2004),
and can help determine population changes if suffi¬
cient sites are visited consistently each year.
Information from these winter counts are used to
determine the status and population trends of many
resident bird species including Black-necked Stork
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus and Sarus Crane Grus
antigone. The results of the AWC show that both
species are apparently declining. For Sarus Cranes, this
is supported by counts at individual sites, e.g. at
Keoladeo-Ghana National Park (Bharatpur),
Rajasthan, numbers declined from 283 in 1983 to 19
in 2004 (K. Kumar verbally 2004). Sarus Cranes have
also been censused using road transects in many
locations in India, but different studies have presented
information differently, making direct comparisons
difficult (Choudhury et al. 1999, Mukherjee 2000,
Sundar et al. 2000a, b, Kaur et al. 2002). Declines are
thought to be driven primarily by deterioration in the
condition of wetlands (Gole 1989, Rahmani 1989,
Meine and Archibald 1996, BirdLife International
2001). Intensification of agriculture is progressing at
an alarming rate, particularly in the Gangetic flood-
plain (Ramankutty and Foley 1999) where most of the
population of Sarus Crane and Black-necked Stork
occur outside protected areas (Rahmani 1989, Sundar
et al. 2000a, Archibald et al. 2003, Sundar 2003,
Sundar and Choudhury 2003).
The reliability of wetland counts or road transects
for estimating population sizes and trends for these two
species is unknown. Some characteristics of both
species make them amenable to testing the efficiency of
survey techniques without marking birds individually.
Both are long-lived and strongly territorial, maintain¬
ing permanent territories in areas with perennial
sources of water (Elliott 1992, Ishtiaq 1998,
Maheshwaran 1998, Maheshwaran and Rahmani
2002, Sundar 2003, Sundar and Choudhury 2003).
These characteristics, however, may make it difficult to
estimate reliably population sizes and trends from
counts only at wetland sites, since both species are also
found in non-wetland agricultural areas (Mukherjee
2000, Mukherjee et al. 2002, Sundar 2003, Sundar and
Choudhury 2003).
In this paper, I test the reliability of wetland counts
and road transects to monitor populations of both
species, and investigate whether there are seasonal
variations in the effectiveness of these methods, in
order to determine the appropriate season to survey
them.
STUDY AREA
I conducted the study along the border of Etawah and
Mainpuri districts in Uttar Pradesh, India, in an area
of c.50 km2 bounded by the towns of Etawah, Saiphai,
Karhal, Sauj, Kurra, Saman, Sarsai Nawar and
Baralokpur. The region consists of a mosaic of natural
wetlands and agricultural fields interspersed with
human habitation (see Sundar 2003, 2004 for detailed
descriptions of the study area). The region experiences
three seasons: summer (March to June), monsoon
(July to October) and winter (November to February).
Five large wetlands are found in the area: Saman Bird
Sanctuary (the only protected area), Sauj, and three
sites that dried up for 2-5 months each year: Kudaiyya,
Kurra and Elasil. All five sites had similar levels of
28
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
human disturbance. Each site had one resident pair of
Black-necked Storks and varying numbers of breeding
pairs of Sarus Cranes. All five sites could also be
viewed along a 105 km road transect running through
Etawah, Saiphai, Kudaiyya, along the Karhal-Kishni
road via Gaad to the Etawah-Farrukhabad road, and
from Lohia to Takhrau.
METHODS
To determine the actual number of breeding pairs of
Sarus Crane and Black-necked Stork present, spot¬
mapping of unmarked territorial pairs of both species
was carried out from December 1999 to January 2002.
During this period, 48 juvenile Sarus Cranes were
colour-banded with standard plastic colour bands.
Observations of these birds were used to determine
territory size (up to 50 ha) and to confirm that it was
possible to differentiate at least some pairs by location.
For Black-necked Storks, repeated observations of
pairs feeding, numbers of chicks with them, and active
nests were used to confirm the location and number of
pairs (Sundar 2003). Since young Black-necked Storks
began to disperse when they were approximately one
year of age, birds of at least that age that were not seen
for more than a month were considered to have
dispersed. For Sarus Cranes, such assumptions could
be avoided because the species’s smaller territory size
ensured that knowledge of the population was always
nearly complete. Information on the number and
location of single birds, pairs, and families of both
species were monitored regularly, giving monthly
estimates of the total population. The proportion of
birds present in the area that were missed during spot¬
mapping and omitted from the total was likely to have
been negligible.
Black-necked Storks could be differentiated into
single birds, adult pairs with no young, and families.
Sarus Cranes were present as resident pairs and
families, plus flocks of up to 400 non-breeding birds
which used larger wetlands to roost and forage (Sundar
and Choudhury 2003).
The road transect was undertaken each month
from December 2000 to February 2002, once the
identity and location of territorial pairs along the route
had been identified. Roads are often perceived as
sources of disturbance to many bird species, although
they are often also used to census bird populations
(Sauder el al. 1971, Arnold 1994). In the study area,
there was no hunting of either species by humans and
both species were remarkably tame. Traffic levels on
most roads in the study area were low and it was
common to see both species along them. Transects
were carried out in the first week of each month on
non-rainy and non-foggy days. They began within an
hour after sunrise (05h00-07h30) and stopped at
10h30.The whole route was covered on two consecu¬
tive mornings. A motorbike with an additional observer
was driven at 25-40 km/h and all storks and cranes
encountered on either side of the road were counted.
At wetlands, we stopped for up to five minutes at a spot
where the whole wetland was visible, and counted all
cranes and storks.
Visibility from the road varied each month owing
to growth of crops. The width of each transect was
therefore measured at kilometre intervals as the
distance to the farthest visible point (up to 1 km) on
either side of the road using a Bushnell range finder.
These values for both sides were averaged to give a
measurement of effective transect width. The popula¬
tion density of both species was then calculated as
number of individuals divided by length x effective
width of the transect. For Sarus Cranes, density was
calculated separately for territorial pairs and non¬
breeding birds. Encounter rate (birds seen/km) was
also calculated for both species, as previous studies
have used both density (Gole 1989) and encounter rate
(Sundar et al. 2000a).
To calculate the effectiveness of road transects, I
calculated the percentage of the known number of
individuals (Black-necked Storks) or known territorial
pairs including families (Sarus Cranes) that was
recorded on each transect. The different approach for
the two species was because Black-necked Storks are
usually seen as single birds (Sundar 2004) whereas
Sarus Crane pairs seldom separate. For Sarus Cranes,
a subset of resident pairs were reliably identifiable by
their location and by colour-banded young. Mean
sighting probabilities (mean number of transects on
which each pair was seen relative to the total number
of transects) were calculated for Sarus Crane pairs with
and without young. For some Sarus Crane pairs,
sighting probability was compared during months
when they were with vs. without young.
Prior to analyses, all data were checked for
normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample tests)
and transformed appropriately when they were not
(proportion and sighting probability data were arcsine
transformed and other data were log[n+l] trans¬
formed). When this failed to normalise the data,
non-parametric tests were used on untransformed
data. Seasonal differences in monthly densities were
compared using a one-way analysis of variance
(AN OVA). Linear regression was used to compare the
relationship between density (or encounter rate) and
the known population each month for Black-necked
Storks (but not for Sarus Cranes, as the total popula¬
tion could not be determined each month).
Differences in sighting probability of pairs and families
were tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; seasonal
differences in sighting probability were compared
using one-way ANOVAs; difference in sighting proba¬
bility within pairs owing to breeding status were tested
using a paired t-test. Data are presented as mean±SE
throughout, both calculated from untransformed data.
Statistical tests were carried out using S-PLUS 2000
(MathSoft 1998-1999).
RESULTS
Black-necked Stork
The total population of storks as determined by spot
mapping (including pairs, families and young that had
dispersed from their natal territories) averaged 52±1
individuals (range: 46-56 individuals) each month. On
Forktail 21 (2005)
Surveying Black-necked Storks and Sarus Cranes in India
29
0.16
Summer Monsoon Winter
Figure 1. Seasonal differences in the population density of
Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus calculated
from monthly road transects. Error bars show 1 SE.
Summer Monsoon Winter
Figure 2. Seasonal differences in the effectiveness of road
transects in detecting Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus
asiaticus as quantified by the mean percentage of known pairs
(solid bars) and families (open bars) detected on each
transect. Error bars show 1 SE.
6 -|
I
Summer Monsoon Winter
Figure 3. Seasonal differences in the population density of
Sarus Cranes Grus antigone calculated from monthly road
transects. Solid bars show values for resident pairs; open bars
show values for all birds including non-breeding individuals.
Error bars show 1 SE.
road transects, 17.9±2.6% (range: 2-35%) of the
population were recorded on average. The mean
density (0.099±0.01 birds/km2) appeared to be highest
in summer and lowest in the monsoon, but these differ¬
ences were not significant (Fig. 1; one-way AN OVA:
F1j13=1.71, P=0.21).The monthly estimates of density
and encounter rate were significantly positively corre¬
lated with the known population size (density: r2= 0.36,
P=0.018; encounter rate: r2= 0.37, P=0.016). The
mean percentage of pairs (including single adults from
known pairs) seen during each transect
(mean=33.6±5.8%; range=3.8-68.4%) was signifi¬
cantly higher than the mean percentage of families
(mean=9.4±3.6%, range=0-33.33%; Fig. 2;Wilcoxon
rank-sum test: Z=3.13, P=0.0017, n=15). There were
no significant differences between seasons in the
percentage of pairs recorded on transects (Fig. 2; one¬
way ANOVA: F1J3= 1.18, P=0.3), nor in the percentage
of families recorded on transects (Fig. 2; one-way
ANOVA: P, n=1.44, P=0.25), perhaps owing to small
sample sizes.
On average, 1.34±0.38% of all Black-necked
Storks were recorded during wetland counts. The
number of Black-necked Storks found in wetlands
averaged 20.5±1.5% (range: 8-25%) of the total
population in the area. Four of the five pairs (80%)
resident in wetland sites were seen at least once during
the 15 wetland counts; on average it took 8.25±0.9
visits (range: 6-10) to first sight these pairs and
13. 3 ±3. 7% (range: 0-40%) of the pairs were seen on
each transect.
Sarus Crane
The total population of cranes each month could not
be estimated owing to the difficulties of estimating
numbers of mobile non-breeding flocks. A total of 158
pairs defended territories through the study period;
none abandoned territories and no new pairs estab¬
lished territories during the study period. Road
transects detected 35.1 ±2.5% of resident pairs on
average. The mean density of cranes (3.55±0.47
birds/km") differed significantly across seasons (Fig. 3;
one-way ANOVA: F1>l3= 4.76, P=0.048), with the
highest densities recorded in winter. The density of
territorial pairs did not differ significantly across
seasons (Fig. 3; one-way ANOVA: F1 13=3.05,
P=0. 104).
Seventy-one territorial pairs were reliably identifi¬
able. Of these, 53 pairs raised young at least once, and
18 pairs did not nest successfully during the study. No
territorial pair was seen in all transects. Over 94% of
territorial pairs were sighted at least once by the fifth
transect, but it took ten transects to see all 7 1 pairs at
least once. The mean sighting probability of crane pairs
without young (32±4.4%) was significantly lower than
for those with chicks (38±2.7%; Wilcoxon rank-sum
test, Z=3.25, P =0.001). This result was supported by
within-pair comparisons (paired t-test: r=1.72, df-52,
P =0.09, n=53 pairs).
The wetland sites supported 14 territorial pairs of
Sarus Cranes (8.9% of the total pairs identified) but
only two of these could be reliably differentiated from
flocks each month. Flocks were present in four of the
five wetland sites, constituting 65.1 ±6.9% (range: 19-
100%) of all non-breeding cranes each month. Total
counts of cranes in each wetland site varied widely with
season, with the highest counts in winter, although this
was not significant (one-way ANOVA: FU3=2.74,
P=0.12.
30
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
DISCUSSION
Black-necked Stork
Black-necked Storks occurred at low densities in the
study area in comparison to Sarus Cranes (mean
density=0.099 vs 3.55 birds/ km: respectively). For
every territorial pair of Black-necked Storks, there were
more than five pairs of territorial Sarus Cranes.
Furthermore, Black-necked Stork was the rarest large
waterbird in the area. On average, densities of Painted
Stork Mycteria leucocephala, Asian Openbill Anastomus
oscitans. Woolly-necked Stork Ciconia episcopus and
Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus recorded
on 15 transects were respectively 7.9, 5.8, 4.1 and 9.3
times greater than those of Black-necked Stork
(unpublished data). In addition, Black-necked Stork
pairs were more difficult to detect: their sighting
probability on road transects was 17.9% compared to
35% for Sarus Cranes. These results are supported by
anecdotal reports (Round et al. 1988, Santiapillai et al.
1997, Barzen 2003, Thomas and Poole 2003) and
empirical evidence (Morton et al. 1993, Purcell 1993)
from other locations within the species’s range. The
large territory sizes of Black-necked Storks result in
lower densities, and consequently lower detectability
compared to Sarus Cranes and other large waterbirds.
In addition, the species may be less tolerant of distur¬
bance along roads than Sarus Crane. Extrapolating
conservatively and excluding unsuitable habitat, I
estimate the population of this species in Etawah and
Mainpuri districts to be 200-250 individuals. This
equates to at least 20% of the estimated Indian popula¬
tion, highlighting the importance of the area for this
species.
Road transects were more effective for monitoring
populations of Black-necked Storks than wetland
counts, detecting 17.9% of the population on average,
compared to 1.3% for wetland counts. This was partly
because only 20.5% of the population was resident in
wetlands. It required 8-9 visits to a wetland site on
average to detect the presence of a pair. However, this
may have been because the study began in winter when
adult storks are less conspicuous while they attend
nests. The sighting probability during wetland counts
may have been higher if longer had been spent at each
wetland (although each site was small and could be
completely censused from the viewpoint selected).
Road transects passing wetland sites are most
useful in regions like Uttar Pradesh which retain
considerable numbers of natural wetlands. In contrast,
in areas such as Gujarat and Rajasthan where the land
almost entirely comprises agricultural fields or arid
habitats, counts at perennial wetlands in summer when
water levels are reduced may be more appropriate than
road transects. Observations at Keoladeo-Ghana
National Park, Rajasthan (S. Sharma verbally 2003)
and in Gujarat (Dave 2004) indicate that Black-necked
Stork numbers peak in summer, presumably as birds
congregate when wetlands dry out. In Madhya
Pradesh, which is nearly completely cultivated with
soybean requiring well-drained, non-flooded land,
counts in near-permanent wetlands may be the most
appropriate method to use.
Black-necked Stork may be less approachable in
other areas, perhaps owing to greater human distur¬
bance, and this may bias surveys: further work is
needed to investigate this. Recorded densities and
encounter rates were lowest during monsoon and
winter months when birds attend nests and are less
conspicuous (Sundar 2003). Therefore, counts in late
winter or summer will be most useful for monitoring
this species, and would provide the most accurate data
on breeding success.
Aerial surveys for this species have been used in
Australia, but it is thought that the numbers recorded
were underestimates (Morton et al. 1993, Purcell
1993). Using aerial surveys to locate nests during the
nesting season, followed by ground surveys, would be
worth trying in locations where they occur in relatively
high densities.
Sarus Crane
Sarus Crane was the most numerous large waterbird in
the area, with densities 4.5, 36, 6.2, 8.6 and 3.9 times
respectively higher than for Painted Stork, Black¬
necked Stork, Asian Openbill, Woolly-necked Stork
and Black-headed Ibis (unpublished data).
Extrapolating conservatively, the population of Sarus
Crane in Etawah and Mainpuri districts is
2,500-3,000 individuals. This equates to c.30% of the
estimated global population of G. a. antigone
(8,000-10,000 individuals: Meine and Archibald
1996), and nearly 10% of the estimated global popula¬
tion for the species (25,000-37,000: Meine and
Archibald 1996). This highlights the importance of the
area for this globally threatened species.
On average, only 35% of known Sarus Crane pairs
were seen during road transects. Road counts may
however be useful for determining relative abundance
at different sites. As wetland sites supported only 8.9%
of breeding pairs, and very few of these were reliably
identifiable, wetland counts were also found to be
inadequate as a survey technique. As previous
estimates of abundance of this species have been
largely based on road transects, the totals are likely to
be underestimates.
Seasonal differences indicate that winter months
are most suitable for surveys. High intra-season varia¬
tion in totals recorded possibly resulted from
disturbance episodes, which are impossible to control
since the majority of birds were in private fields and
wetlands frequented by humans. Families were more
likely to be seen than pairs. This is counterintuitive
since one might expect families to be more sensitive to
disturbance from traffic than pairs without chicks.
However, the small size of territories, and the greater
conspicuousness of families may explain this result.
Implications of the study
Waterfowl counts at the scale of the Asian Waterfowl
Census are subject to various errors, including individ¬
ual bias, but it is thought that random counting errors
tend to cancel each other out (Li and Mundkur 2004).
However, research on such errors has been limited. It
appears that for the two species considered here,
volunteer counts in wetlands have been inappropriate
for estimating total population size or even local
abundance. In India, only 19-44 Black-necked Storks
and 47-178 Sarus Cranes were counted in five winters
during 1997-2001 (Li and Mundkur 2004). These
Forktail 21 (2005)
Surveying Black-necked Storks and Sarus Cranes in India
31
numbers are very low considering the estimates for
populations in Etawah and Mainpuri districts alone
and considering the numbers of Sarus Cranes
recorded in specific counts (1,991-3,315 in three
counts during 1999-2001: Choudhury et al. 1999,
Sundar et al. 2000b, Kaur et al. 2002). The importance
of surveying non-wetland areas was also demonstrated
by Kachar et al. (1987) for Demoiselle Grus virgo and
Common Crane Grus grus in Gujarat. For both
species, counts at wetland sites were highly unpre¬
dictable and required additional knowledge to infer
population trends from the results. Road transects,
however, when used to cover a large enough area,
provided much better estimates of abundance (Kachar
etal. 1987).
Very few previous studies have explored the
number of visits required to detect territorial pairs in
linear transects. D’Amico and Hemery (2003)
estimated the probability of detecting pairs of White-
throated Dippers Cinclus cinclus to be 63-94%. This
higher level of detectability is likely to be a conse¬
quence of their conspicuousness in riverine habitats,
and smaller territories. Further work with individually
marked storks and cranes would allow the determina¬
tion of optimal transect width and length.
Are the current population estimates for the two
species too low? For Black-necked Stork, the present
estimate of 1,000 birds in Asia is based on wetland
counts. Given that these took place in winter — an
inappropriate season to count these birds due to their
nesting habits — and that wetlands hold only a small
proportion of the population, the total is likely to be an
underestimate. However, further information from
elsewhere in the species’s range is needed. For Sarus
Crane, the current estimates are based on a combina¬
tion of methods including nationwide species-specific
counts, and are likely to be more accurate. A long¬
term, nationwide programme of road counts in areas of
different land-use, rainfall intensity and human distur¬
bance is needed.
CONCLUSIONS
Road transects can be very useful for monitoring
populations of large waterbirds in areas that retain
relatively large wetlands in the landscape. For Black¬
necked Stork, road transects are effective if they pass
major wetlands. For Sarus Crane, road transects are
preferable to wetland counts, and are useful for deter¬
mining parameters such as the proportion of young or
of non-breeding birds. Coordinated road transects that
include wetlands can be undertaken across very large
scales by volunteers who are not necessarily profes¬
sional biologists. However, rudimentary training for
volunteers is important to reduce individual biases
(Frederick et al. 2003). Counts in February are optimal
for these two species. It would be useful to calculate
correction factors for both road transects and wetland
counts using marked birds. Given the dismal forecast
for wetlands in India and concern for the future of
these two species, ascertaining their numbers and
monitoring them using the most appropriate method is
vital.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
During fieldwork, I was supported by scholarships awarded by the
Wildlife Institute of India (WII) under the project ‘Impact of land
use changes on the ecology and habitat of the Indian Sarus Crane
( Grus antigone antigone ) in the Indo-Gangetic flood plains’. I thank
S. K. Mukherjee and B. C. Choudhury for infrastructure and facili¬
ties. A travel grant to the International Crane Foundation (ICF) was
provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and I thank D.
Ferguson for this. I thank G. W. Archibald and J. Harris for provid¬
ing fellowship support at ICF during the writing of this paper, and J.
Barzen for facilitating the fellowship through the University of
Wisconsin, Madison. The paper was conceived during discussions at
ICF, and I thank B. T. Barch, M. Hayes and A. Lacy for sharing their
experiences with counting Sandhill Cranes in North America. I
thank R. Blatchford, S. Swengel and S. Zimorski of ICF for provid¬
ing colour bands and R. L. Singh (Chief Wildlife Warden, Uttar
Pradesh Forest Department) for issuing banding permits very
quickly. I thank D. Singh and A. Verma for assistance in fieldwork; R.
Chauhan and family for their hospitality at Etawah; B. Didrickson
(ICF), Shashi and M. S. Rana (WII) for library support; G. P. Clancy
and T. Mundkur for providing useful literature; and B. Wright for
providing facilities at the Wildlife Protection Society of India during
the completion of the paper. G. W. Archibald, B. C. Choudhury, G.
P. Clancy, M. C. Coulter, D. Ferguson, F. Ishtiaq, R. Jaensch, G.
Maheshwaran, C. Prentice and an anonymous reviewer provided
comments that substantially improved a previous draft of this
manuscript.
REFERENCES
D’Amico, F. and Hemery, G. (2003) Calculating census efficiency
for river birds: a case study with the white-throated dipper
Cinclus cinclus in the Pyrenees. Ibis 145: 83-86.
Archibald, G. W., Sundar, K. S. G. and Barzen, J. (2003) A review of
the three subspecies of Sarus Cranes. J. Ecol. Soc. 5-15.
Arnold, T. W. (1994) A roadside transect for censusing breeding
coots and grebes. Wild! Soc. Bull. 22: 437-443.
Barzen, J. (2003) An aerial survey of wetlands in northern Cambodia
2001. Phnom Penh: International Crane Foundation Cambodia.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Choudhury, B. C., Kaur, J. and Sundar, K. S. G. (1999) Sarus Crane
count - 1999. Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.
Dave, S. (2004) Ecological study on the piscivorous birds of the
semi-arid area. Ph.D. thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot,
India.
Elliott, A. (1992) Family Ciconiidae (storks). Pp. 441-442 in J. del
Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the
world. Vol 1 . Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Frederick, P. C., Hylton, B., Heath, J. A., and Ruane, M. (2003)
Accuracy and variation in estimations of large numbers of birds
by individual observers using an aerial survey simulator. J. Field
Ornithol. 74: 284-287.
Gole, P. (1989) The status and ecological requirements of Sarus
Crane. Phase I. Report submitted to Ministry of Environment
and Forests, Government of India.
Ishtiaq, F. (1998) Comparative ecology and behaviour of storks in
Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan, India. Ph.D. thesis, Aligarh
Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Kaur, J., Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2002) Sarus Crane
Count - 2001. Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.
Khachar, S., Patankar, H. R., Gaekwad, A., Mundkur, T., Parvez, R.
and Naik, R. M. (1987) Wintering cranes in Gujarat state, India.
Pp. 327-334 in J. Harris, ed. Proceedings 1987 International Crane
Workshop, 1-10 May 1987, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province, People’s
Republic of China. Baraboo, Wisconsin, U.S. A.: International
Crane Foundation.
Li, Z. W. D. and Mundkur, T., eds. (2004) Numbers and distribution of
waterbirds and wetlands in the Asia-Pacific region. Results of the
32
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Asian waterbird census 1997-2001. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
Wetlands International.
Lopez, A. and Mundkur, T. (eds.) (1997) The Asian waterfowl census
1994-1996. Results of the coordinated waterbird census and an
overview of the status of wetlands in Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Wetlands
International.
Maheshwaran, G. (1998) Ecology and behaviour of Black-necked
Stork ( Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Latham, 1790) in Dudwa
National Park, Uttar Pradesh. Ph.D. thesis, Aligarh Muslim
University, Aligarh, India.
Maheshwaran, G. and Rahmani, A. R. (2002) Foraging behaviour
and feeding success of the Blacknecked Stork ( Ephippiorhynchus
asiaticus) in Dudwa National Park, Uttar Pradesh, India. J. Zool.
258: 189-195.
MathSoft (1998-1999) S-PLUS 2000 guide to statistics. Seattle,
U.S.A.: MathSoft.
Meine, C. D. and Archibald, G. W. (1996) The cranes: status survey
and conservation action plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge,
U.K.: IUCN.
Morton, S. R., Brennan, K. G. and Armstrong, M. D. (1993)
Distribution and abundance of Brolgas and Black-necked Storks
in the Alligator River region, Northern Territory. Emu 93:
88-92.
Mukherjee, A. (2000) Ecological study on the Sarus Crane Grus
antigone in the central Gujarat. Ph.D. thesis, Saurashtra
University, Rajkot, India.
Mukherjee, A., Borad, C. K. and Parasharya, B. M. (2002) Breeding
performance of the Indian sarus crane in the agricultural
landscape of western India. Biol. Cons. 105: 263-269.
Perennou, C., Mundkur, T., Scott, D. A., Follestad, A., and Kvenild,
L. (1994) The Asian Waterfowl Census 1987-91: distribution and
status of Asian waterfowl. AWB Publication No. 86. IWRB
Publication No. 24. Kuala Lumpur: AWB, and Slimbridge, U.K.:
IWRB.
Purcell, J. K. (1993) The biology and management of the Black¬
necked Stork ( Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in the Richmond Valley
of N.S.W. Unpublished report submitted to Southern Cross
University, Australia.
Rahmani, A. R. (1989) Status of the Black-necked Stork
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in the Indian subcontinent. Forktail 5:
99-110.
Ramankutty, N. and Foley, J. A. (1999) Estimating historical changes
in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global
Biogeochemical Cycles 13: 997-1027.
Round, P. D., Amget, B., Jintanugol, J. and Treesucon, U. (1988) A
summary of larger waterbirds in Thailand. Tiger Paper 15(3):
1-9.
Santiapillai, C., Dissanayake, S. R. B., Alagoda, T. S. A. (1997)
Observations on the Black-necked Stork ( Ephippiorhynchus
asiaticus) in the Ruhuna National Park, Sri Lanka. Tiger Paper
24(4): 7-11.
Sauder, D. W., Linder, R. L., Dahlgren, R. B. and Tucker, W. L.
(1971) An evaluation of the roadside technique for censusing
breeding waterfowl. J. Wildlife Manage. 35: 538-543.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2003) Notes on breeding biology of Black-necked
Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Etawah and Mainpuri
districts, Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 15-20.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2004) Group size and habitat use by Black-necked
Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in an agriculture dominated
landscape in Uttar Pradesh, India. Bird Conserv. Internat. 14:
323-334.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2003) The Indian Sarus
Crane Grus a. antigone : a literature review. J. Ecol. Soc. {India) 16:
16-41.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Kaur, J. (2001) Distribution and nesting sites
of the Blacknecked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 98: 276-278.
Sundar, K. S. G., Choudhury, B. C. and Kaur, J. (2000a) Sarus
Crane count - 2000. Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.
Sundar, K. S. G., Kaur, J. and Choudhury, B. C. (2000b)
Distribution, demography and conservation status of the Indian
Sarus Crane ( Grus antigone antigone) in India. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 97: 319-339.
Thomas, W. W. and Poole, C. M. (2003) An annotated list of the
birds of Cambodia from 1859 to 1970. Forktail 19: 103-128.
K. S. Gopi Sundar, Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group, do International Crane Foundation, E-11376, Shady
Lane Road, Bamboo, WI-5391 3, U.S.A. Email: gopi@savingcranes.org
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 33-41
Notable bird records from Bawangling National
Nature Reserve, Hainan Island, China
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK, LEE KWOK SHING, ZHANG JIAN-FENG and SU WEN-BA
Bird surveys, include the use of camera traps, were conducted in Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan province, China,
during 1998-2005. A total of 143 species were recorded in the reserve and its immediate environs, including three new records for
the island (Slaty-backed Forktail Enicurus schistaceus, Yellow-cheeked Tit Parus spilonotus and Mountain Tailorbird Orthotomus cucula-
tus), two threatened species (Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens and Hainan Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus hainanus ) and two Near
Threatened species (Japanese Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone atrocaudata and Yellow-billed Nuthatch Sitta solangiae). Other notable
records included the endemic Hainan Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron katsumatae and a number of endemic races (e.g. Silver Pheasant
Lophura nycthemera whiteheadi, Black-browed Barbet Megalaima ooriifaber, Indochinese Green Magpie Cissa hypoleuca katsumatae and
Orange-headed Thrush Zoothera citrina aurimacula), some of which were photographed, apparently for the first time.
INTRODUCTION
The tropical island of Hainan is surrounded by the
South China Sea, and is the southernmost province of
China, with a land area of c. 33, 600 knr. In 1998,
BirdLife International identified Hainan as an
Endemic Bird Area (EBA 142) of critical priority, with
four restricted-range species now considered to be
globally threatened or Near Threatened: White-eared
Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus (Endangered),
Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens (Vulnerable),
Hainan Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus hainanus
(Vulnerable) and Yellow-billed Nuthatch Sitta solangiae
(Near Threatened: Stattersfield et al. 1998, BirdLife
Figure 1. Map showing location of Bawangling National Nature Reserve and sites mentioned in text, Hainan, China.
34
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
International 2004a). Hainan also supports 46
endemic subspecies, some of which have been
suggested as deserving elevation to full species status
(e.g. Goodwin 1964, Stattersfield et al. 1998, BirdLife
International 2003, Kilburn 2004a, 2004b).
Despite its global importance, the avifauna of
Hainan remains poorly known with few published
studies (Tang Ziying and Li Zhixun 1957, Shaw
Tsenhwang and Hsu Weishu 1966, Cheng Tso-hsin
and Tan Yaokuang 1973, Guangdong Institute of
Entomology and Zhongshan University 1983), and
fewer still available to non-Chinese readers (e.g.
Swinhoe 1870, Hartert 1910, King and Liao Weiping
1988, Olsson et al. 1993). In the last ten years, little
new information has been published, except studies on
endemic galliforms (GaoYuren 1991, 1999, Liang Wei
et al. 2003), understorey forest birds (Zou Fasheng and
Chen Guizhu 2004), and a report of a brief birding trip
(Kilburn 2004b).
STUDY SITE
Bawangling National Nature Reserve (BNNR;
18°57'-19°1 l'N 1 09°03'-l 09° 1 7'E) lies in west Hainan
c.220 km from the provincial capital of Haikou (Fig.
1). A reserve of c.67 km2 with the best-preserved forest
was established in 1980 to protect rare fauna and flora,
including Hainan Partridge, Hainan Peacock Pheasant
Polyplectron katsumatae, and most importantly, the last
confirmed population of the rarest ape on earth: the
endemic Hainan gibbon Nomascus ( nasutus ) hainanus.
In autumn 2003, the reserve was enlarged more than
four-fold to encompass a large area of selectively
logged and regenerating forest in the south and south¬
west, giving a new total area of c.300 km2.
BNNR has one of the best remaining tropical
forests in China, and has recently been identified as an
Important Bird Area (IBA) in the Indo-Burmese
Forests (F06) (BirdLife International 2003, 2004b).
The reserve comprises a series of low mountains, with
the highest peak, Heiling (ling = range), at 1,560 m.
The vegetation types include tropical lowland and
hillside rainforest and montane broadleaf forest.
Although past logging concessions have destroyed
much lowland forest, extensive primary and selectively
logged hillside forest can still be found above 700 m.
The best-preserved forest sits along the western
foothills of Futouling (1,441 m), at the north-eastern
side of the reserve, where Hainan Gibbon occurs.
Remnant lowland old-growth forest, retained either as
linear buffer strips along streams or forest blocks, can
be found as low as 350 m. BNNR has a tropical
seasonal climate with mean annual temperature of
21.3°C and mean annual rainfall of 1,660 mm.
METHODS
In 1998, 2003, 2004 and 2005, biologists from
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG), an
environmental charity based in Hong Kong, and its
local partners visited BNNR and the nearby Wangxia
limestone forest. During 3-7 April 1998, a KFBG-led
biodiversity survey team conducted a rapid survey in
secondary forest and human-modified landscape
around Bawangling Town (140 m), in primary forest
around Dong’er substation (1,100 m), in primary
forest of the reserve’s core area en route from
Fenshuiling (1,050 m) to Nanchahe substation (520
m), as well as in the disturbed primary limestone forest
of the nearby Wangxia area (70-605 m) (Kadoorie
Farm and Botanic Garden 2001). Various members of
the KFBG biodiversity team visited BNNR in October
and December 2003, May, July, October and
December 2004, and January 2005, during which a
large area of the reserve was covered and birds were
recorded. Between April and September 2003, six sets
of infra-red auto-triggered cameras were installed in
the reserve, as part of an on-going KFBG South China
mammal survey. Trapping effort mainly focused on
old-growth forest on Futouling and its periphery,
including primary forest in the Dong’er and Nanchahe
areas, as well as disturbed/secondary forest in the
Dongwu area. During all surveys, bird records were
collated from combined efforts of line transect and
fixed-point observations at vantage points in different
habitats, a combination which proved effective in
maximising the number of species encountered in a
habitat mosaic. Night surveys were also conducted
when team members camped inside old-growth forest.
Photographs of some rare and/or threatened forest bird
species were taken during the camera-trap survey,
some of which appear to represent the first photo¬
graphs of wild, live specimens of the species/races.
IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife International
(2004a).
Captions to plates on opposite page
Plate 1. Camera-trap photograph of Hainan Partridge
Arborophila ardens, Dong’er area (c. 1,000 m), 21 May 2003.
Plate 2. Camera-trap photograph of Hainan Peacock
Pheasant Pblyplectron katsumatae , Dongwu area (c. 1,000 m),
8 April 2003.
Plate 3. Camera-trap photograph of Silver Pheasant Lophura
nycthemera (endemic race whiteheadi ), Dong’er area (c. 1,000
m), 20 May 2003.
Plate 4. Black-browed Barbet Megalaima oorti (endemic race
faber ), Nanchahe area (1,100 m), 19 October 2003.
Plate 5. Camera-trap photograph of Blue-rumped Pitta Pitta
soror (endemic race douglasi), Dong’er area (c. 1,000 m), 19
May 2003.
Plate 6. Hainan Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus hainanus,
Fenshuiling (1,000 m), 25 October 2003.
Plate 7. Grey Laughingthrush Garrulax rnaesi (endemic race
castanotis ), Dongwu area (1,000 m), 22 September 2004.
Plate 8. Eyebrowed Wren Babbler Napothera epilepidota
(endemic race hainanus), Nanchahe area (700 m), 14 July
2004.
Forktail 21 (2005) Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan Island
35
7
8
36
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
RESULTS
In total, 143 species were recorded from BNNR and
the nearby Wangxia limestone forest between 1998 and
2005 (see Appendix). Notes on the more significant
records are given below.
Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens
Vulnerable. Camera-trap photographs of this endemic
partridge were taken at c. 1,000 m in the Dong’er area
(Plate 1). Individuals and their calls were frequently
recorded in all forest areas within the reserve, includ¬
ing the eastern side of Futouling facing Qingsong
Xian, and including in selectively logged forest. Birds
were seen as low as c.600 m in the Qichadaling area.
The species is a very rare resident in hillside forest at
600-1,200 m on Hainan Island (ChengTso-hsin 1987,
BirdLife International 2004a).
Hainan Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron katsumatae
This endemic taxon is regarded as a valid species by
some authors (e.g. Inskipp et al. 1996, MacKinnon and
Phillipps 2000, Madge and McGowan 2002) and as an
insular race of the Grey Peacock Pheasant P. bicalcara-
tum by others (e.g. Meyer de Schauensee 1984, Cheng
Tso-hsin 1987, Gao Yuren 1999, Sibley and Monroe
1990). It was regularly photographed (including a
family of three) by camera traps in forest at c. 1,000 m
in the Dongwu area (Plate 2). The species was also
observed in primary hillside forest at 800-1,000 m in
the Dong’er and Nanchahe areas. Reserve staff
reported that it occurs in shrubby forest-edge habitat
in the Nanchahe area down to c.550 m. It is considered
very rare in the remaining hill forests of south-west
Hainan (Cheng Tso-hsin 1987, MacKinnon and
Phillipps 2000).
Silver Pheasant Lophura nycthemera (endemic race
whiteheadi)
Camera-trap photographs were regularly taken in
primary forest at c. 1,000 m in the Dong’er area (Plate
3). On 12 October 2004, a group of at least three
individuals was observed foraging in selectively logged
primary forest at c.400 m in the Dongyi area. Another
foraging group was seen in secondary forest in the
Qichadaling area (c.500 m) on 26 January 2005. The
distinctive feathers of this subspecies, with bold black
markings, were also found in the eastern side of
Futouling, facing Qingsong Xian and in Wangxia
limestone forest. Reserve staff reported that the species
is widespread throughout forested areas of the reserve,
down to c.300 m.
Black-browed Barbet Megalaima oorti (endemic
race faber )
This endemic taxon may warrant specific status
(Goodwin 1964, Kilburn 2004b; but see Collar 2004).
It was frequently recorded in forest areas at 400-1,100
m (Plate 4), and its characteristic call was one of the
dominant sounds in the forest. The species was previ¬
ously considered a rare resident in China (Cheng
Tso-hsin 1987), but it has been recorded from many
forest areas throughout South China in recent years
(Lee Kwok Shing et al. in prep.) and this particular
race is also widespread in forest on Hainan.
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
This species was observed and photographed in a
rocky forest stream at c.600 m in the Nanchahe area on
6 April 2004. On 15 May 2004, a call heard by a forest
streamlet at c.600 m, believed to be of this species, was
recorded on the eastern side of Futouling facing
Qingsong Xian. This species, considered as a very rare
resident restricted to Hainan and southern Yunnan in
China (ChengTso-hsin 1987), is possibly at risk in the
country. Only one individual was previously recorded
during the KFBG biodiversity surveys in 15 forest
areas across Hainan between 1998 and 2004 (Lee
Kwok Shing et al. in prep.).
Blue-rumped Pitta Pitta soror (endemic race
douglasi )
Numerous camera-trap photographs of this elusive
species were taken in primary forest in the Dong’er and
Nanchahe areas at 700-1,100 m (Plate 5). In October
2003, adults and juveniles were regularly seen along a
ridge in primary forest at c.900 m in the Nanchahe
area. A juvenile with a streaked breast and reddish bill
was flushed in selectively logged forest at c.950 m in
the Qichadaling area on 16 May 2004. An adult was
seen by a small stream in mature forest at c.800 m in
the Nanchahe area on 5 December 2004. On 24
January 2005, feathers of this species was also found in
the Wangxia limestone forest at c.850 m.This species is
considered very rare in China (ChengTso-hsin 1987).
Japanese Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone
atrocaudata
Near Threatened. Individuals were seen in limestone
forest at Wangxia at 140 m on 5 April 1998 and at
500 m on 6 April 1998.
Slaty-backed Forktail Enicurus schistaceus
On 3 April 1998, one bird was seen inside the core area
near Fenshuiling at 1,100 m. On 5 December 2004,
one bird was seen by a stream on the border of the
reserve near Bawangling town at c. 400m. These are the
first records for Hainan (see Guangdong Institute of
Entomology and Zhongshan University 1983, Cheng
Tso-hsin 1987, MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
Yellow-billed Nuthatch Sitta solangiae (endemic
race chienfengensis )
Near Threatened. This species was frequently recorded
in limestone forest at Wangxia and in the core area of
BNNR. It is known from only three or four widely
disjunct areas in Vietnam, Laos and Hainan Island in
China (BirdLife International 2004a).
Yellow-cheeked Tit Pams spilonotus
A total of five birds were seen: four recorded near
Bawangling town at 150 m on 5 April 1998 and one in
the Dong’er core area at 1,100 m on 6 April 1998.
These are the first records for Hainan (see Guangdong
Institute of Entomology and Zhongshan University
1983, ChengTso-hsin 1987, MacKinnon and Phillipps
2000).
Sultan Tit Melanochlora sultanea
This species was frequently recorded in the forested
core area of the reserve, and appears to be quite
Forktail 21 (2005) Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan Island
37
common in BNNR. This species may be at risk in
China owing to the continued degradation of mature
forests. Despite being reported to occur throughout
coastal South China, the species has only been
recorded in four forest sites on Hainan Island during
the KFBG biodiversity surveys in 54 forest areas across
South China between 1997 and 2004 (Lee Kwok
Shing et al. in prep.). It is considered uncommon in
China (Cheng Tso-hsin 1987).
Mountain Tailorbird Orthotomus cuculatus
On 6 and 7 April 1998, a total of five birds were
recorded at 1,100 m in the Dong’er area and at 70 m
in limestone forest at Wangxia. These are the first
records for Hainan (see Guangdong Institute of
Entomology and Zhongshan University 1983, Cheng
Tso-hsin 1987, MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
Hainan Leaf Warri.f.r Phylloscopus hainanus
Vulnerable. This endemic warbler was recorded
frequently and photographed in broadleaf forest above
800 m in BNNR (Plate 6). It was more noticeable in
disturbed or secondary forest. It is considered locally
common at 600-1,500 m but it is only known from
seven localities in Hainan (BirdLife International
2004a).
Grey Laughingthrush Garrulax maesi (endemic
race castanotis )
The insular race castanotis is very distinctive and may
better be treated as a full species (see Inskipp et al.
1996, Kilburn 2004b). Camera-trap photographs of
this taxon were taken in all forest areas (including
secondary forest) within the reserve (Plate 7), and the
species’s characteristic calls were regularly heard
throughout the reserve above c.300 m. It is considered
an uncommon resident in China (Cheng Tso-hsin
1987).
Eyebrowed Wren Babbler Napothera epilepidota
(endemic race hainanus)
This secretive species was photographed in primary
forest along a rocky stream at c.700 m in the Nanchahe
area (Plate 8). A pair approached the observers giving
alarm calls, possibly suggesting the presence of a nest
in the vicinity. This species is considered very rare in
China (Cheng Tso-hsin 1987).
DISCUSSION
Composition of the bird fauna
BNNR has wide altitudinal range and a large area has
been selectively logged. Consequently it has a mosaic
of habitat types supporting a diverse avifauna. During
our surveys, the most frequently encountered species
in old-growth forest included Black-browed Barbet,
Mountain Bulbul Hypsipetes mcclellandii, Chestnut
Bulbul Hemixos castanonotus, Black Bulbul Hypsipetes
leucocephalus , Puff-throated Bulbul Alophoixus pallidus,
Thick-billed Green Pigeon Treron curvirostra, Grey¬
cheeked Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia, Grey-chinned
Minivet Pericrocotus Solaris, Rufous-capped Babbler
Stachyris ruficeps , Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirga-
tus, Hainan Blue Flycatcher Cyornis hainanus and
Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus. Species such as Light-
vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis, House Swift Apus
affinis, Grey-chinned Minivet, Grey-cheeked Fulvetta
and Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis dominated
the more disturbed habitats.
Amongst the species recorded were the endemic
Hainan Partridge, Hainan Peacock Pheasant and
Hainan Leaf Warbler. The endemic subspecies of
Black-browed Barbet, Blue-rumped Pitta, Greater
Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus johni, and
Grey Laughingthrush were found to be common in
BNNR. Many large-bodied forest species were
recorded, notably Treron and Ducula pigeons, Lesser
Yellownape Picus chlorolophus. Greater Yellownape P.
flavinucha, Red-headed Trogon Harpactes erythro-
cephalus, and Indochinese Green Magpie Cissa
hypoleuca, which are difficult to see elsewhere in South
China (Lee Kwok Shing et al. in prep.).
Our survey did not cover freshwater habitats in the
lowlands; thus the status of a number of rare riverine
specialists known from Hainan, such as Blyth’s
Kingfisher Alcedo hercules (Near Threatened), Brown
Fish Owl Ketupa zeylonensis. Great Thick-knee Esacus
recurvirostris. River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii and
White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus
(Endangered) could not be determined. In addition,
we did not record a number of forest specialists,
notably Red-breasted Parakeet Psittacula alexandri,
Brown Wood Owl Strix leptogranunica, Large-tailed
Nightjar Caprimulgus macrurus, Pale-capped Pigeon
Columba punicea. Orange-breasted Green Pigeon
Treron bicincta, White-bellied Green Pigeon T. sieboldii.
Green Imperial Pigeon Ducula aenea, Jerdon’s Baza
Aviceda jerdoni, Rufous-bellied Eagle Hieraaetus
kienerii, White-winged Magpie Urocissa whiteheadi,
Ratchet-tailed Treepie Temnurus temnurus, and Hill
Myna Gracula religiosa. While many of these species
have not been seen in Hainan for several decades,
possibly reflecting the effects of hunting and habitat
degradation, local people reported sightings of some of
these species in recent years. Further surveys will
doubtlessly add additional species to the reserve’s list,
and more work is clearly needed to reveal the true
ornithological value of this site.
Conservation
The reserve, together with surrounding hills, in partic¬
ular the Wangxia limestone forest, can be considered an
important hotspot for forest birds of the northern
Indochina region. However, prior to the establishment
of the reserve a large part of it had been selectively
logged, and some of the lower slopes have been clear-
felled for establishing monoculture plantations (e.g.
pines Pinus spp.) and grazing land. With a long tradi¬
tion of hunting and gathering forest products, the
increasing local ethnic-minority population continues
to put pressure on the reserve. Poaching, forest
encroachment and other types of disturbance remain
to be controlled despite intensive enforcement effort.
In addition, knowledge, equipment and facilities for
effective enforcement and conservation are lacking
amongst the relevant staff owing to a shortage of
funding. Although Wangxia has the best-preserved
limestone forest on the island (KFBG, unpublished
data), it has yet to be included in the protected area
38
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
system. The national logging ban on natural forest has
not completely halted illegal tree-felling for subsistence
and small-scale trade, such that these activities
continue to threaten the integrity of this fragile ecosys¬
tem. There may be, however, a brighter future for
BNNR. IvFBG, together with other NGOs, research
institutes and the provincial authority, are working
with the reserve management to improve the reserve’s
capacity for managing the forest ecosystem and
controlling incompatible activities, and a conservation
strategy is being formulated to preserve limestone
forest habitat on the island.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank John Fellowes of KFBG for valuable comments.
Chen Qing and Zheng Haiqiang of BNNR helped in the camera¬
trapping survey and provided extra information; the former also
kindly provided Plate 7. This work has been funded by KFBG.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2003) Saving Asia’s threatened birds: a guide
for government and civil society. Cambridge, U.K.: Birdlife
International.
BirdLife International (2004a) Threatened birds of the world 2004.
CD-ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2004b) Important Bird Areas of Asia: key sites
for conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International
(BirdLife Conservation Series No. 13).
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
Cheng Tso-hsin and Tan Yaokuang (1973) On the birds of Hainan.
II. Acta Zoologica Sinica 19(4): 405-416. (In Chinese with
English abstract.)
Collar, N. J. (2004) Endemic subspecies of Taiwan birds — first
impressions. BirdingASIA 2: 34-52.
GaoYuren (1991) Present situation of the Grey peacock pheasant on
Hainan Island. World Pheasant Assoc. News 38: 8-10.
GaoYuren (1999) Conservation status of endemic Galliformes on
Hainan Island, China. Bird Conserv. Internat. 9: 41 1-416.
Goodwin, D. (1964) Some aspects of taxonomy and relationships of
barbets (Capitonidae). Ibis 106: 198-220.
Guangdong Institute of Entomology and Zhongshan University
(1983) Birds and beasts of Hainan Island. Beijing: Science Press.
(In Chinese.)
Hartert, E. (1910) The birds of Hainan. Nov. Zool. 17: 189-254.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (2001) Rapid biodiversity assess¬
ments of Bawangling National Nature Reserve and Wangxia
Limestone Forest, Western Hainan, 3 to 8 April 1 998. South China
Biodiversity Survey Report Series: No. 2. Hong Kong: KFBG.
Kilburn, M. (2004a) Hainan Waterbird Survey, 29 December
2003-8 January 2004. Hong Kong Birdwatching Soc. Bull. 192:
22-23.
Kilburn, M. (2004b) Forest birding in Hainan, Jianfengling and
Bawangling National Nature Reserves, 5-8 January, 2004.
Hong Kong Birdwatching Soc. Bull. 192: 23-25.
Kang, B. and Liao Weiping (1988) Hainan Island bird notes. Hong
Kong Bird Report 1988: 88-101.
Lee Kwok Shing, Lau Michael Wei-Ning, Fellowes, J. R. and Chan
Bosco Pui Lok (in prep.) Forest bird fauna of South China:
notes on current distribution and status.
Liang Wei, Wang Jichao, Wang Wenyi and Su Wenba (2003) Survey
for Hainan peacock pheasant in Hainan Island, China.
Tragopan 19: 14-15.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Madge, S. and McGowan, P. (2002) Pheasants, partridges and grouse:
a guide to the pheasants, partridges, quails, grouse, guineafowl,
buttonquails and sandgrouse of the world. London: Christopher
Helm.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Olsson, U., Alstrom, P. and Colston, P. R. (1993) A new species of
Phylloscopus warbler from Hainan Island, China. Ibis 135: 2-7.
Shaw Tsenhwang and Hsu Weishu (1966) On the birds of Hainan. I.
Non-passeriformes. Acta Zoologica Sinica 18(1): 93-112. (In
Chinese with English abstract.)
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L., Jr. (1990) Distribution and taxonomy
of the birds of the world. New Haven, U.S.A.: Yale University
Press.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conserva¬
tion. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Swinhoe, R. (1870) On the ornithology of Hainan. Ibis 2(6): 77-97,
230-367.
Tang Ziying and Li Zhixun (1957) Brief report on a survey of
Hainan’s vertebrates. Acta Zoologica Sinica 1(4): 246-249. (In
Chinese.)
Zou Fasheng and Chen Guizhu (2004) A study of understory bird
communities in tropical mountain rain forest of Jianfengling,
Hainan Island, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 24(3): 510-516. (In
Chinese with English abstract.)
Chan Bosco Pui Lok and Lee Kwok Shing, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, China Programme, Lam Kam Road,
Tai Po, N. T., Hong Kong. Email: scbt@kfbg.org
Zhang Jian-f eng, Bawangling National Nature Reserve Management Office, Changjiang County, Hainan, China,
572722.
Su Wen-ba, Hainan Provincial Forestry Department, Wildlife Conservation Centre, 80 Haifu Road, Haikou, Hainan,
China 570203.
Forktail 21 (2005) Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan Island
39
40
CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005) Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan Island
41
Key
Columns 3-6 give number of individuals seen in April 1998 (Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden 2001). Asterisks in column 7 indicate records made in
October and December 2003, May, July, October and December 2004, and January 2005. Altitudinal range refers to all observations. VU = Vulnerable,
NT = Near Threatened.
'
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 43-50
Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan,
with special reference to the present status of
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Numbers of White-headed Ducks in Pakistan have declined substantially since the late 1980s. We surveyed 16 localities from which
the species was known historically, and recorded 33 birds at four sites in January-February 2003: Ucchali (22 individuals), Jahlar
(two), Nammal (two) and Rawal lake (seven). In total, 1 18,784 individuals of 149 species were counted at the 16 sites.
INTRODUCTION
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala is considered
globally Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2004) and
it is listed on Appendix 1 of the Convention on
Migratory Species. It occupies a fragmented range
from Spain and Algeria in the west to Mongolia,
western China and India in the east (BirdLife
International 2001). The resident North African
population (400-600 birds) is stable, the Spanish
population (c.2,500 birds) is increasing, and the East
Mediterranean and Asian population of 5,000-10,000
birds is declining (Li and Mundkur 2003, Wetlands
International 2002). The global population, which was
around 100,000 individuals at the start of twentieth
century, has decreased to 8,000-13,000 birds in 2002
(BirdLife International 2001, Li and Mundkur 2003).
The global population declines in the first half of the
twentieth century have been attributed mainly to
habitat loss and over-hunting (Green and Hughes
1996). The main threats to the Asian population are
habitat loss owing to unsustainable use of water
resources and recent droughts, exacerbated by hunting
and disturbance (BirdLife International 2001, Li and
Figure 1. Historic distribution (1883-2002) of White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala in Pakistan. Squares indicate sites
surveyed in 2003. Open squares indicate sites where White-headed Duck was found. Shading indicates the state of Punjab.
Site names: 1. Rawal lake; 2. Kailar Kahar lake; 3. Shahpur (Jhelum bridge); 4. Jahlar lake; 5. Ivhabbaki lake; 6. Ucchali lake;
7. Nammal lake; 8. Rangpur lake; 9. Mianwali (Chashma barrage); 10. Kharar lake; 11. Khangarh lake; 12. Bhawalnagar
(Suleimanki headworks); 13. Chalianwala (Mandi Bahauddin); 14. Hafizabad (Qadarabad headworks); 15. Sialkot (Marala
headworks); 16. Jassar (River Ravi); 17. Idal Khei Dhand (Kohat); 18. Akora (Kabul river); 19. Mardan; 20. Peshawar; 21.
Halkot; 22. Bund Khush Dil Khan (Pishin); 23. Zangi Nawar (Chagai); 24. Sunari lake (Shangar); 25. Nowshera (NWFP)
44
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Table 1. Waterbirds recorded at 16 sites in Punjab, Pakistan.
Mundkur 2003). These impacts are likely to be exacer¬
bated by the effects of global climate change.
In Pakistan, 889 were counted in 1987-1988, but
numbers have declined substantially since then, and
fewer than 50 have been recorded since 1995-1996
(Chaudhry et al. 1997). Since the late 1980s, White-
headed Duck have been known to winter in Pakistan
only at Ucchali, Khabbaki and Jahlar (known collec¬
tively as Ucchali wetlands complex, a Ramsar site since
1996). It is not clear, however, whether the lack of
sightings elsewhere is because the birds are absent or
because of inadequate surveys.
The goal of this survey, therefore, was to look for
this species and assess its status at the 16 sites in
Punjab where it had been recorded since the 1880s:
Rawal lake, Kallar Kahar lake, Shahpur (Jehlum
bridge), Jahlar lake, Khabbaki lake, Uchalli lake,
Nammal lake, Rangpur lake, Mianwali (Chashma
barrage), Kharar lake, Khangarh lake, Bahawalnagar
(Sulmanki headworks), Chalianwala, Hafizabad
(Qadrabad headworks), Sialkot (Marala headworks)
and Jassar (River Ravi) (Fig. 1; Appendix 1).
METHODS
Observations were made, usually for a full day, at each
of the 16 sites, between 28 January and 21 February
2003. Up to five points per site were selected from
which the whole site could be observed. At each point,
birds were counted using a telescope before moving to
the next point as rapidly as possible without disturbing
the birds. Birds were identified using Grimmett et al.
(2001). The surface area of water at each site was
calculated from a map plotted using coordinates
recorded with a Magellan GPS; then the % reduction
since 1990 (IUCN 1990) was calculated.
RESULTS
In total, 118,784 individuals of 149 species were
counted at the 16 sites (Table 1; Appendix 2).
Chashma lake, Qadirabad headworks, Rangpur lake,
Marala headworks, Sulmanki headworks, Jassar (Ravi
river) and Rawal lake had the highest numbers of
individuals. A total of 33 White-headed Ducks were
counted at four sites: Ucchali (22 individuals), Jahlar
(two), Nammal (two) and Rawal lake (seven).
The highest numbers of species were at Chashma
(126 species), Nammal (115), Rangpur (110), and
Ucchali (103) lakes. The ten most abundant species
were: Eurasian Coot Fulica atra, Common Pochard
Ay thy a ferina, Northern Pintail Anas acuta , Gadwall
Anas strepem, Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis,
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Northern Shoveler Anas
clvpeata, Water Rail Rallus aquaticus , Black-winged Stilt
Himantopus himantopus and Red-wattled Lapwing
Vanellus indicus.
White-headed Ducks were recorded only at
Ucchali, Jahlar, Nammal and Rawal lakes, and were
absent from all other sites from which the species was
known historically. Many sites had significantly
reduced water surface areas compared to data
presented in IUCN (1990), with an overall reduction
at all sites combined of 51%. Khabbaki, Kharrar,
Chalianwala and Khangarh had all suffered 80-100%
reductions in area since the 1990 figures. The likely
causes of these shrinkages include ground water
extraction, development of barrages and canal systems.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan
45
RECOMMENDATIONS
There is an urgent need to ensure the maintenance and
improvement of the habitat conditions for White-
headed Duck at the sites where the species was
recorded. This will require the government, nature
conservation institutions and other agencies to work
together collaboratively to conserve the remaining
populations. Specifically: (1) a task-force from govern¬
ment and non-government sectors should be
constituted to study the population dynamics of migra¬
tory waterbirds in these areas; (2) detailed hydrological
observations of water inflow and outflow, retention
capacity, loss through evapotranspiration, manipula¬
tion of water level, silt load and its impact on
vegetation etc. should be recorded; (3) pollution levels
should regularly be monitored with a special emphasis
on phosphorus and nitrogen cycling, one of the princi¬
pal factors responsible for degradation of water quality
in wetlands; (4) water levels should be managed to
benefit waterbirds; and (5) some sites should be
considered as closed areas for waterbirds, with distur¬
bance by local people and cattle prohibited.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Inspiration for this survey came from a recent report by Wetlands
International on White-headed Duck in Central Asia. Funding and
logistical support was provided by WWF-Pakistan. In particular we
would like to thank Ali Hassan Habib and Richard Garstang for their
assistance, encouragement and adventure they offered me. Richard
Garstang’s continuous support and guidance provided much-needed
help. We are grateful to Muhammad Akhtar for his encouragement.
We would like to express our gratitude to Ornithological Society of
Pakistan (OSP) and Wildlife and Parks Department, Punjab
(WPWD) which were partners in this survey. Among many people
whom we wish to thank are: Aleem Ahmad Khan (OSP), Agha Azaz,
Anwar Mann Muhammad Afzal (WPWD), Salman Ashraf, Anwar
Naseem, Waqar Naseem and Bisharat Naz (WWF-Pakistan). Our
appreciation is also due to all our survey participants for their
generous assistance. Wali Khan and Mr Asmat were not only good
drivers but were also helpful during the field surveys.
REFERENCES
Bailey, F. M. (1916) Occurrence of the White-headed or Stiff-tail
Duck (. Erismatura leucocephala) in the Kohat district. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 24: 599.
Baker, E. C. S. (1908) Indian ducks and their allies,. Bombay: Bombay
Natural History Society.
Barton, F. J. H. (1902) The occurrence of the white-faced stiff tail
duck at Mardan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 14: 375.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Bolster, R. C. (1923) On the habits of the White-headed Duck
( Oxyura leucocephala) . J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 29: 284-285.
Boomford, T. (1887) Letter about Stiff-tailed Duck. Stray Feathers
10: 521.
Chaudhry, A. A. (1992) Habitat changes threaten the White-headed
Duck in Punjab, Pakistan. Threatened Waterfowl Specialist Group
News 2: 5-6
Chaudhry, A. A., Gill. A. H. and Ali, Z. (1997) Conservation of White-
headed Duck in the Salt Range lakes (Ucchali Complex), Punjab,
Pakistan. Faisalabad: Punjab Wildlife Research Institute.
Christison, A. F. P. (1942) Some additional notes on the distribution
of the avifauna of northern Baluchistan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
43: 478-487.
Field, F. F. (1942) Occurrence of the Stiff-tailed Duck at Nowshera,
N.W.F.P. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 42: 445.
Flemming, W. E. (1930) Occurrence of the Stiff-tailed Duck
(. Erismatura leucocephala) in the Shahpur district, Punjab. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 34: 577.
Green, A. J. and Anstey, S. (1992) The status of the White-headed
Duck Oxyura leucocephala. Bird Conserv. Intematn. 2: 185-200.
Green, A. J. and Hughes, B. (1996) Action plan for the White-headed
Duck Oxyura leucocephala. Pp. 119-146 in B. Heredia, L. Rose
and M. Painter. Globally threatened birds in Europe. Strasbourg:
Council of Europe.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2001) Pocket gtdde to the
birds of the Indian subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
IUCN (1990) IUCN directory of South Asian protected areas.
Cambridge, U.K.: World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
Jourdain, F. C. R. (1921) White-headed duck shot near Quetta. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 27: 954.
Koning, F. J. and Walmsley, J. G. (1972) IWRB mission to West
Pakistan, February 1972. IWRB Bull. 33: 42-51.
Li, Z. W. D. and Mundkur, T. (2003) Status overview and recommen¬
dations for conservation of the White-headed Duck Oxyura
leucocephala in Central Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Wetlands
International.
Macnab, A. J. (1902) Occurrence of the White-faced Stiff-tail Duck
at Mardan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 13: 182-183.
Mallalieu, M. (1988) Birds in Islamabad, Pakistan 1985-1987.
Unpublished report.
Marshall, T. E. (1903) Notes on birds near Quetta. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 15: 351-355.
Mountfort, G. and Poore, D. (1968) Report on the second world
wildlife fund expedition to Pakistan. (WWF Project 311).
Unpublished report to WWF-Switzerland.
Roberts, T. J. (1991) The birds of Pakistan. Vol. 1. Karachi: Oxford
University Press.
Savage, C. D. W. (1965a) White-headed ducks in West Pakistan.
Wildfowl 16: 121-123.
Savage, C. D. W. (1965b) Wildfowl survey in Southwest Asia.
Wildfowl Trust 16th Annual Report: 123-125.
Scott, D. A., ed. (1989) A directory of Asian wetlands. Gland,
Switzerland, and Cambridge, U.K.: International Union for
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
Sheerwood, H. J. (1897) The White-faced Duck ( Erismatura leuco¬
cephala) J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 11: 150-151.
Sturm, G. de L’isle (1932) The Stiff-tailed Duck ( Erismatura leuco¬
cephala) J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 35: 687-688.
Tenison, W. P. C. (1909) The Stiff-tailed Duck ( Erismatura leuco¬
cephala) near Nowshera. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 19: 264.
Waite, H. W. (1922) The Marbled duck (Marmaronetta angustirostris)
in the Punjab. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 28: 807.
Waite, H. W. (1948) The birds of the Punjab salt range (Pakistan) J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. 48: 93-117.
Wetlands International (2002) Waterbird population estimates. Third
edition. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wetlands International.
Whitehead, C. H.T. (1909) Additions and corrections to the “Birds
of Kohat”. Ibis (9)3: 620-623.
Whitehead, C. H.T. (1911) Notes on the birds of Sehore, Central
India, with special reference to migration. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 21: 153-170.
Whitehead, W. A. (1931) Notes on the White-headed Duck or Stiff-
tail ( Erismatura leucocephala). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 35:
211-212.
Wright, R. G. and Dewar, D. (1925) The ducks of India. London:
Witherby.
Zulfiqar Ah* and Muhammad Akhtar, Zoology Department, Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan.
*Present address: Department of Wildlife and Ecosystem, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Email: zulfiqarali68@yahoo.com
46
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
APPENDIX 1
Records ofWhite-headed Duck in Pakistan
Forktail 21 (2005)
Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan
47
Key
+ = Present, exact number not known
BMNH= Bombay Museum of Natural History; BNHS= Bombay Natural History Society; PFIP= Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar;
PWRI= Punjab Wildlife Research Institute.
48
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan
49
50
ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Forktail 21 (2005)
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 51-60
A preliminary ornithological assessment and
conservation evaluation of the PT Daisy logging
concession, Berau district, East Kalimantan,
Indonesia
JONATHAN C. EAMES
An ornithological survey in the PT Daisy logging concession, Berau district, East Kalimantan, Indonesia, was undertaken as part of
a wider research effort to provide baseline data on its biodiversity in order to facilitate improved forest management. PT Daisy retains
almost 30% of primary terrestrial forest, whilst 45% of the concession has now been logged. A total of 230 bird species were recorded
including six Vulnerable, 47 Near Threatened and two restricted-range species. Compared to other protected areas in Kalimantan, the
bird species diversity of PT Daisy is above average, but the reserve supports fewer globally threatened species and restricted-range
species. The bird fauna of PT Daisy shows greatest similarity with Gunung Palung and Tanjung Puting National Parks. The undis¬
turbed mixed dipterocarp lowland forests of PT Daisy are likely to be typical of the Sangkulirang Peninsula. At a landscape level, PT
Daisy is important since it is part of a currently contiguous forest chain running through the Sangkulirang Peninsula. The best current
conservation opportunity for forests in the peninsula is probably under a sustainable forest management regime. The current unsus¬
tainable approach to forest management at PT Daisy will inevitably lead to seriously reduced levels of biodiversity.
INTRODUCTION
In Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo), remaining
natural forests are subject to logging, conversion to oil
palm and other tree crops and clearance for permanent
agriculture. In the 12-year period from 1985 to 1997,
forest cover in Kalimantan declined from 75% to 60%,
a loss of 8,474,000 ha (706,000 ha per year), compris¬
ing 21% of the four provincial forest estates (Holmes
2002). This is worse than on Sumatra and Sulawesi, in
terms of area and rate of forest loss (Holmes 2002).
Conversion to plantation crops, particularly oil palm,
has been assumed to be the primary cause of forest
loss. Other sources include steady small-scale
encroachment by smallholder farmers along the length
of the forest frontier boundary. Most of the deforesta¬
tion has occurred on lowland plains. Lowland forest
supports the highest levels of biodiversity and has the
greatest potential for sustainable forestry (Holmes
2002). If current trends continue, all non-swampy
lowland forest in Kalimantan will be virtually
destroyed by 2010 (Holmes 2002).
Holmes (2002) believed that the situation had
become so critical that he recommended a complete
revision of the forest function classification to repre¬
sent the reality of present forest distribution in
Kalimantan, and that absolute limits be set on the
extent and distribution of further conversions in
Kalimantan. He also recommended a number of biodi¬
versity conservation initiatives, including a review of
those areas of the biodiversity action plan that required
re-evaluation. Subsequently, some sites proposed in
the 1982 National Conservation Plan (MacKinnon
and Artha 1981) have now lost their conservation
value, whilst the relative value of others has increased
as a result of surrounding landscape conversions.
Holmes (2002) further identified a number of sites
where immediate biodiversity conservation initiatives
are urgently required. These include lesser-known
areas that are believed to still have major importance
for the conservation of biodiversity, such as
Sangkulirang Peninsula in East Kalimantan.
MacKinnon and Artha (1981) noted both that the
existing protected areas system for East Kalimantan
was far from satisfactory and that the scope for acquir¬
ing new areas was very limited. They made a number
of recommendations for habitat types that should be
included in the protected areas system, and specifically
mentioned the need to include forests on limestone as
found on the Sangkulirang Peninsula. The
Sangkulirang Peninsula was subsequently identifed as
one of 23 Important Bird Areas in Kalimantan on the
basis of the globally threatened and restricted-range
bird species it supports (Holmes et al. 2000, 2001).
PT Daisy is an active logging concession located on
the Sangkulirang Peninsula (Fig. 1). It covers
67,500 ha in two disjunct forest blocks on karst
limestone with moderate to steep slopes at 0-700 m.
The natural vegetation consists of hill evergreen and
lowland mixed dipterocarp forest, mangrove forest,
intertidal habitats and inshore islands. According to
land classification based on the LandsatTM 1 16/59 of
13 November 1999, primary terrestrial forest now
covers at least 29.6% of the area, mangrove forest
covers at least 2.2%, logged forest covers at least 45%,
and 8.8% of the area is classified as non-forest (perma¬
nent agriculture or shifting cultivation; note that 14%
was obscured by clouds and unclassified in this image).
The landscape is composed of a mosaic of primary and
derivative vegetation types. The forest supports at least
44 plant families and at least 60 mammal species, of
which 16 are endemic to Borneo (Eames et al. 2001).
Jarvie (2001) reported that the concession has been
heavily affected by over-cutting, there is barely any
protection of forest and the plasma nutfah areas
(reserved forest blocks providing a natural source of
seed, which is mandatory under Indonesian forest law)
are wholly inadequate to conserve representative biodi¬
versity. Furthermore, the volume of wood extracted is
unsustainable, especially from the easily accessible
level lowland areas where the 35-year prescribed
interval between logging cycles has not been followed.
52
J. C. EAMES
Forktail 21 (2005)
This has resulted in total canopy destruction in many
areas. The complexity of forest laws, rampant corrup¬
tion in the forestry administration, lack of security of
forest concession tenure, low levels of understanding
amongst concession managers of basic forest manage¬
ment practices (including basic map-reading skills)
and illegal logging by outsiders have all been identified
as management issues (Eames et al. 2001). The current
unsustainable approach to forest management at PT
Daisy threatens sustainability of the commercial
forestry operation and in the long term will inevitably
lead to seriously reduced levels of biodiversity.
To achieve more sustainable forest management,
PT Daisy and the Tropical Forest Trust are developing
a new collaborative venture. A preliminary biological
assessment was considered an important stage in
project development (Eames et al. 2001). This paper
presents the results of a 21 -day ornithological survey
undertaken during 7-27 September 2001. This work
was undertaken as part of a wider research effort to
provide baseline data on the biodiversity of PT Daisy,
to put this into a regional and global context, and to
make conservation recommendations to guide
planning of future forestry activities proposed by the
Tropical Forest Trust and the management of PT
Daisy (Eames et al. 2001).
METHODS
Bird surveys were conducted during 7-27 September
2001 from three forest camps in Block B and at the
logging concession headquarters on Suleman Bay.
Camp A was located on a logging road in primary
forest at 01"13'20"N 1 18°37'45''E, camp B was located
in logged forest at 01'’04'10"N 118"47'10"E and camp
C was located in logged forest 200 m from the primary
forest in the plasma nutfah at 01°08'56"N 1 1 8"4 1 '3 1 "E.
Additional observations were made elsewhere in Block
B, in Block A and in mangrove forest in both blocks.
Active searches were begun from shortly after dawn,
with effort continuing all day, weather permitting.
Most observations were made at the forest edge from
logging roads. Trails in the forest and along logging
roads were walked slowly with frequent stops to
observe mixed-species feeding flocks or birds feeding
at fruiting trees. Birds were detected both by sight and
by call. Searches for nocturnal birds were also made.
On 14 transects (Table 1), data were collected on the
bird community using a modification of the method
outlined in MacKinnon and Phillipps (1993). This
involved making a list of the first ten species recorded,
and then repeating the process to make several such
lists. Plotting the cumulative number of species
recorded gave species discovery curves to indicate local
diversity. Species recorded on a high proportion of lists
are likely to be the most abundant and/or detectable
(MacKinnon and Phillipps 1993). Threat status
follows BirdLife International (2004) and restricted-
range status follows Stattersfield et al. (1998). The
degree of similarity between the bird faunas at PT
Daisy and other protected areas was assessed using
Sorenson’s Similarity Index (Magurran 1988), which is
given by the formula:
Tanjung Redep
Celebes Sea
Figure 1. Location of PT Daisy.
C = — — —
(a + b)
where j = the number of shared species between two
areas, a = the number of species in area A, and b = the
number of species in area B.
RESULTS
A total of 230 bird species was recorded (Appendix 1),
including six Vulnerable species: Bulwer’s Pheasant
Lophura bulweri, Short-toed Coucal Centropus rectun-
guis , Large Green Pigeon Treron capellei , Wallace’s
Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nanus, Lesser Adjutant
Leptoptilos javanicus and Blue-headed Pitta Pitta baudii ,
47 Near Threatened species (Appendix 2) and two
restricted-range species: Hose’s Broadbill Calyptomena
hosii and Chestnut-crested Yuhina Yuhina everetti.
To determine the most abundant/detectable
species, a total of 96 lists of ten species were made in
two habitats, logged forest edge (80 lists) and primary
forest edge (16 lists). The ten most commonly
recorded bird species in each habitat are listed in
Tables 2 and 3. Six species were recorded in both
habitats. These results may reveal subtle differences in
the avifauna of forest-edge habitats but reveal little
about relative abundance between logged and primary
forest. Species discovery curves for the two habitats
show similar initial steepness, but the smaller sample of
forest-edge lists means that it is not possible to deter¬
mine whether the curves would have levelled out at
similar values (Fig. 2).
SELECTED SPECIES ACCOUNTS
Species accounts are provided for threatened and
restricted-range species, plus species that were newly
recorded for East Kalimantan or represented signifi¬
cant range extensions within Borneo according to
Smythies (1999) and van Balen and Nurwatha (1997).
All records refer to sight records.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Ornithological assessment of the PT Daisy logging concession, Indonesia
53
Table 1 . Transects used for bird surveys.
Bulwer’s Pheasant Lophura bulweri
Vulnerable. This is a submontane species inhabiting
mixed dipterocarp forest, bamboo areas on old
landslips and Agathis forest (Smythies 1999). A pair
was seen at the roadside in primary forest-edge at
15h45 on 11 September by D. da Costa and L.
Nyoman.
Olive-backed Woodpecker Dinopium rafflesii
Near Threatened. This species is an uncommon
resident of primary and secondary lowland forest
(Smythies 1999). One female was seen on transect 14
on 27 September. According to Smythies (1999) this
represents the first record from East Kalimantan, but
the species has apparently been previously recorded at
PT Daisy (S. van Balen in litt. 2004).
Short-toed Coucal Centropus rectunguis
Vulnerable. This species occurs in primary and logged
lowland forest and is an extreme lowland forest special¬
ist (Smythies 1999). Three were recorded: one heard
on transect 8 on 17 September, one seen on transect
11 on 21 September, and one heard on transect 12 on
23 September.
Large Green Pigeon Treron capellei
Vulnerable. This species is resident, but sparingly
distributed throughout lowland forest in Borneo and it
is scarce in most areas in comparison with the smaller
green pigeons (Smythies 1999). Up to 50 birds were
observed feeding in a large fruiting fig near Camp C
from 17h00 on 16 September. Ten birds were present
the following morning, and 30 were seen after 17h00.
In addition, one was seen on transect 8 on 17
September and flocks of four and two were seen on
transect 9 on 18 September.
Wallace’s Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nanus
Vulnerable. This species is resident in Borneo, occur¬
ring in particular in East Kalimantan (Smythies 1999).
One was seen flying through the canopy carrying a
small passerine on transect 11 on 21 September. Later
Table 2. The ten most commonly recorded bird species in logged
forest-edge.
Table 3. The ten most commonly recorded bird species in primary
forest-edge.
mammal, by climbing through the lower canopy and
54
J. C. EAMES
Forktail 21 (2005)
middle storey at forest edge by the logging camp in
Block A.
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
Vulnerable. This species is a local resident in Borneo
(Smythies 1999). It was recorded on severeal
occasions: one was seen feeding in the intertidal area of
an inlet on 1 2 and 1 3 September; three birds were seen
feeding at the same location and a flock of 12 were seen
soaring in the distance on 1 6 September; six birds were
seen feeding at the same locality on 19 September. A
colony with six nests and five fledged young was
located at the north entrance to the channel between
the mainland and Sigenting-besar island on 20
September. One was seen in mangroves in Block A on
23 September and another was seen in Block A on 25
September; a group of five were seen feeding at a creek
mouth near 01’16'N 118"41'E on 25 September; and
one was seen in the intertidal inlet south of Suleman
bay on 26 September.
Blue-headed Pitta Pitta baudii
Vulnerable. This is a locally common resident through¬
out lowland forests (Smythies 1999). Several were
recorded: a female was seen in late morning along
transect 4 on 12 September; several were heard there
in the late afternoon on the same day; one was heard
on transect 11 on 21 September; a pair was observed
along a stream in late afternoon on Block A also on 21
September; one male was seen foraging in riverine
forest in Block A on 22 September; and one was heard
on transect 13 on 26 September.
Hose’s Broadbill Calyptomena hosii
Near Threatened; restricted-range. This is primarily a
submontane species (although there are recent lowland
observations) which has a patchy distribution
(Smythies 1999); it had been previously recorded at
Maau on the Bengalun River in East Kalimantan
(Smythies 1999) and in Kayan Mentarang National
Park (van Balen and Nurwatha 1997). Up to five were
seen at a fruiting tree on transect 6 on 1 4 September
and a female was seen at the same tree on 15
Number of lists
Figure 2. Species discovery curves in logged (dashed line)
and primary (solid line) forest-edge, derived from repeated
lists of ten species.
September. These records extend the range of the
species 275 km eastwards in Borneo.
Chestnut-crested Yuhina Yuhina evernti
Restricted-range. This species is a common submon¬
tane and montane resident (Smythies 1999). Six were
recorded: two were seen mobbing a Moustached Hawk
Cuckoo Hierococcyx vagans on transect 8 on 17
September; two were seen at forest edge on transect 10
on 19 September; and two were seen on transect 1 1 at
600 m on 21 September. The species has been previ¬
ously found at low elevations at Kutai Reserve in East
Kalimantan (Smythies 1999) and in Kayan Mentarang
National Park (van Balen and Nurwatha 1997). These
records are the first from the Sangkulirang Peninsula,
and extend the known range of the species by c.200 km
eastwards in Borneo.
Scarlet-breasted Flowerpecker Prionochilus
thoracicus
Near Threatened. This species is a common resident in
the lowlands of Borneo (Smythies 1999). One was seen
on transect 1 on 9 September. According to Smythies
(1999) this is the first record from East Kalimantan.
DISCUSSION
Biological importance
Bird species diversity at PT Daisy (230 species) was
above the mean value of 218 species for eight protected
areas in Kalimantan (Table 4), although it should be
noted that these totals are likely to reflect observer
effort to some degree. Adding in data for two other
Bornean sites (Danum Valley Conservation Area
including Ulu Segama forests: 240 species; Kayan
Mentarang National Park: 286 species) gives a mean of
227, which is just below the value for PT Daisy. Of the
230 bird species recorded in PT Daisy, 53 species
(23%) are considered threatened (Vulnerable) or Near
Threatened, although many of the latter remain
common and widespread. This reflects the interna¬
tional concern for the conservation status of lowland
Sundaic forests. The number of globally threatened
species found in eight protected areas in Kalimantan
ranged from two to twelve species, with a mean of
seven species (Table 4). PT Daisy, with six species, is
slightly below the mean, although the same caveats
about observer effort apply. The number of restricted-
range species at these sites was 0-12, with a mean of
three (Table 4). PT Daisy also fell below average in this
respect, with two species (Hose’s Broadbill and
Chestnut-crested Yuhina). The Bornean Mountains
Endemic Bird Area should therefore be extended
eastwards to encompass this part of the Sangkulirang
Peninsula. PT Daisy supports four Bornean endemics:
Bulwer’s Pheasant, Blue-headed Pitta, Hose’s
Broadbill and Bornean Blue Flycatcher Cyornis
superbus. Whilst levels of micro-endemism are low
(2%), levels of regional endemism are much higher,
with 118 species (51%) endemic to the Sunda region
(peninsular Malaysia, Java, Bali, Sumatra and Borneo).
The degree of similarity between the bird faunas at
PT Daisy and other protected areas in Kalimantan was
compared using Sorenson’s Similarity Index; high
Forktail 21 (2005)
Ornithological assessment of the PT Daisy logging concession, Indonesia
55
Table 4. Bird species diversity and endemism at PT Daisy compared to seven other protected areas in Kalimantan (sources: MacKinnon
and Phillipps 1993, van Balen and Nurwatha 1997, Eames et al. 2001).
values indicate a high degree of similarity between the
species assemblages (Table 4). There was greatest
similarity with Gunung Palung and Tanjung Puting,
reflecting the shared occurrence of lowland forest
habitats in these areas. There was least similarity with
Gunung Niut (which supports montane habitats) and
Sungai Negara (which supports swamp habitats). The
undisturbed mixed dipterocarp lowland forests of PT
Daisy are likely to be typical of the Sangkulirang
Peninsula.
At a landscape level, PT Daisy is important since it
part of a currently contiguous forest chain running
north-west to south-east through the Sangkulirang
Peninsula. However, although PT Daisy is larger than
all but three existing protected areas in East
Kalimantan (Jepson et al. 2002), it may not be large
enough by itself to support viable populations of bird
species that have large home-range sizes and occur at
low population densities. It is therefore important that
forest cover be maintained both within the area and
contiguously outside it. If PT Daisy were incorporated
into the proposed Sangkulirang-Mangaliat National
Park, as has been previously suggested by MacKinnon
(1982), Momberg et al. (1998) and Jepson et al.
(2002), then this problem could be avoided. The
proposed reserve would be the second largest
protected area in Kalimantan after Kayan Mentarang
National Park. Alternatively, if PT Daisy together with
adjoining concessions were placed under sustainable
forest management regimes, and then combined with
the proposed Sangkulirang-Mangaliat National Park,
the protected landscape would be far larger, with even
bigger benefits to conservation.
Conservation
The effects of logging on biodiversity in the tropics
have been documented by Grieser Johns (1997) and
Haworth and Counsell (1999). Within the Indo-
Malayan Realm there have been a number of studies,
including ones that have focused specifically on the
effects on lowland bird communities e.g. Johns (1986,
1987), Lambert (1990, 1992) and Marsden (1998).
Although some studies have shown that selective
logging reduces species richness and overall abundance
(e.g. Johns 1986), others show species richness to be
similar in logged and primary forest, with composition
and population densities of many species differing
between these habitats (Lambert 1992, Grieser Johns
1996). This may explain the similarity of the species
discovery curves in Fig. 3 (notwithstanding the small
sample size). Following logging, certain taxa, notably
flycatchers, woodpeckers, trogons and wren babblers
become comparatively rare, whilst nectivorous and
opportunistic frugivorous species increase in
abundance. Furthermore the activity levels of some
species increase, whilst others range over a larger area
(Lambert 1992). Although a high proportion of species
recorded in unlogged forest reappear in logged forest
1 2 years after logging, some, including terrestrial litter-
gleaning and understorey flycatchers, do not (Johns
1989). While quantitative data on the effects of logging
on bird species diversity and abundance was not
collected in the present survey, anecdotal observations
suggested differences between logged and unlogged
forest. For example: Red-naped Trogon Harpactes
kasumba was only recorded from primary forest; Grey¬
chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias umbratilis was
recorded four times in primary forest but only once in
logged forest; Bornean Blue Flycatcher was recorded
only in primary riverine forest; and Striped Wren
Babbler Kenopia striata was recorded only in primary
riverine forest.
Previous proposals to establish the Sangkulirang-
Mangkaliat National Park (MacKinnon 1982,
Momberg et al. 1998) have not yet been acted upon.
Furthermore, since political and administrative decen¬
tralisation have become policy initiatives in the
post-Suharto era, major ecosystem reserves have
become more difficult to designate. Therefore the best
current conservation opportunity for forests in the
Sangkulirang Peninsula, including PT Daisy, is
probably under sustainable forest management. In
order to maintain the full biodiversity attributes of PT
Daisy it is recommended that (1) the original bound¬
aries of the concession should be maintained; (2) a
sustainable forest management regime should be
developed and implemented; and (3) levels of forest
law enforcement should be immediately increased.
There is an important role for international NGOs and
donors such as the World Bank to lobby and press for
a nation-wide increase in wages, means, and number of
people employed in forest law enforcement in
Indonesia. Such measures will reduce the occurrence
of illegal logging in concessions and protected areas,
56
J. C. EAMES
Forktail 21 (2005)
and improve the implementation of sustainable
forestry. In order to maintain the full biodiversity
attributes of the Sangkulirang Peninsula at the regional
scale, it is recommended that a landscape-level
management plan be developed in collaboration with
adjacent timber concessions on the Sangkulirang
Peninsula.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper has been produced as a result of work funded by the
Tropical Forest Trust. I would like to thank Scott Poynton of the
Tropical Forest Trust and Chad Ovel of Scancom. I thank all the
members of the biodiversity survey team: Gabriella Fredriksson,
Damy da Costa, Madun Flerman, Lukas Nyoman, Pak Husni, Ben
Jarvis, Rizali Noor and Andrey N. Kuznetsov. I would like to thank
the staff of PT Daisy particularly Yusuf Murad, Rizali Noor, Madun
Herman and Pak Husni who extended their full support and cooper¬
ation and whose prompt and efficient assistance made our fieldwork
possible. I would also like to thank Paul Andrew, Dr Bas van Balen,
Dr Frank Lambert and Dr Graham Tyrie. At the office of the
BirdLife International Indonesia Programme (now BirdLife
Indonesia) I acknowledge the vital support of Sukianto Lusli, Irma
Susilawati for assisting in obtaining references and W. M. Rombang
for his assistance in providing IBA data and map translation skills. At
the office of the BirdLife International Asia Division I would like to
thank Richard Grimmett for his support for this work, Rudyanto, and
especially Santi Lisani for her help in making logistical arrangements.
In Hanoi I acknowledge the support of the BirdLife International
Vietnam Programme staff, especially Nguyen Due Tu who struggled
long and hard overcoming mapping software problems, Andrew
Tordoff, Vu Mirth Phuong and Nguyen Luong Duyen. I thank Paul
Jepson and Frank Momberg for their support and encouragement.
Finally I thank Dr Bas van Balen and an anonymous referee for many
helpful comments.
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Derek Holmes, a
pragmatic conservationist and ornithologist who passed away in
Bandung, Java in October 2000.
REFERENCES
van Balen, B. and Nurwatha, P. F. (1997) The birds of the Kayan
Mentarang National Park, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Unpublished report to WWF Indonesia Programme.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Eames, J. C., Kuznetsov, A. N., Fredriksson, G. and Jarvis, B. (2001)
A preliminary biological assessment of PT Daisy, Berau district.
East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Unpublished report to the Tropical
Forest Trust.
Grieser Johns, A. (1997) Timber production and biodiversity conserva¬
tion in tropical rain forests. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge
University Press.
Haworth, J and Counsell, S., eds. (1999) Life after logging: the impacts
of commercial timber extraction in tropical rainforests. London:
Friends of the Earth Trust.
Holmes, D. A. (2002) Indonesia: where have all the forests gone ?
Washington D.C.: World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region.
Holmes, D., Marthy, W. and Octaviani, D. (2000) Important Bird
Areas in Kalimantan. Bogor: BirdLife International Indonesia
Programme. Unpublished draff.
Holmes, D., Rombang, W. M. and Octaviani, D. (2001) Daerah
penting bagi burung di Kalimantan. Bogor. PKA/BirdLife
International-Indonesia Programme.
Jarvie, J. (2001) Environmental scoping report of PT Daisy.
Unpublished report.
Jepson, P, Momberg, F. and van Noord, H. (2002) A review of the
efficacy of the protected area system of East Kalimantan
Province, Indonesia. Natural Areas J. 22 (1): 28-42
Johns, A. D. (1986) Effects of selective logging on the ecological
organisation of a peninsular Malaysian rainforest avifauna.
Forktail 1: 65-79.
Johns, A. D. (1987) The use of primary and selectively logged rainfor¬
est by Malaysian hornbills (Bucerotidae) and implications for
their conservation. Biol. Conserv. 40: 179-190.
Johns, A. D. (1989) Recovery of a Peninsular Malaysian rainforest
avifauna following selective timber logging: the first twelve years.
Forktail 4: 89-105.
Lambert, F. R. (1990) Avifaunal changes following selective logging
of a north Bornean rain forest. Report to ODA/NERC project
F3CR26/G1/05. Aberdeen: Institute of Tropical Biology,
University of Aberdeen.
Lambert, F. R. (1992) The consequences of selective logging for
Bornean lowland forest birds. Pp. 443-457 in A. G. Marshall and
M. D. Swaine, eds. Tropical rain forest: disturbance and recovery.
London: The Royal Society.
MacKinnon, J. (1982) National Conservation Plan for IndonesiaVolume
1: Introduction, evaluation methods and overview of national nature
richness. Bogor: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United
Nations.
MacKinnon, J. and Artha, M. B. (1981) National Conservation Plan
for Indonesia Volume 5: Kalimantan. Bogor: Food and Agriculture
Organisation of the United Nations.
MacKinnon, J. R. and Phillipps, K. (1993) A field guide to the birds of
Borneo, Sumatra, Java and Bali. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University
Press.
Magurran, A. E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement.
London: Chapman and Hall.
Marsden, S. J. (1998) Changes in bird abundance following selective
logging on Seram, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 12: 605-61 1.
Momberg, F., Jepson, P. and van Noord, H. (1998) Kalimantan biodi¬
versity review. Jakarta: WWF Indonesia.
Smythies, B. E. (1999) The birds of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia:
Natural History Publications (Borneo).
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conserva¬
tion. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Jonathan C. Eames, Programme Manager, BirdLife International in Indochina, #4 Lane 209, Doi Can Street, Hanoi,
Vietnam. Email: Eames@netnam.org. vn
Forktail 21 (2005)
Ornithological assessment of the PT Daisy logging concession, Indonesia
57
58
J. C. EAMES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Species Status
Dusky Broadbill Corydon sumatranus
Black-and-red Broadbill Cymbirhynchus macrorhynchos
Black-and- yellow Broadbill Eurylaimus ochromalus NT
Green Broadbill Calyptomena viridis NT
Hose's Broadbill Calyptomena hosii NT, RR
Golden-bellied Gerygone Gerygone sulphurea
Asian Fairy Bluebird Irena puella
Greater Green Leafbird Chlompsis sonnerati
Lesser Green Leafbird Chloropsis cyanopogon NT
Blue-winged Leafbird Chloropsis cochinchinensis
Mangrove Whistler Pachycephala grisola
Crested Jay Platylophus galericulatus NT
Black Magpie Platysmurus leucopterus NT
Slender-billed Crow Corvus enca
White-breasted Woodswallow Artamus leucorynchus
Dark-throated Oriole Oriolus xanthonotus NT
Black-naped Oriole Oriolus chinensis
Black-hooded Oriole Oriolus xanthornus
Bar-bellied Cuckooshrike Coracina striata
Lesser Cuckooshrike Coracina fimbriata
Pied Triller Lalage nigra
Scarlet Minivet Pericrocotus flammeus
Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike Hemipus picatus
Black-winged Flycatcher-shrike Hemipus hirundinaceus
White-throated Fantail Rhipidura albicollis
Pied Fantail Rhipidura javanica
Bronzed Drongo Dicrurus aeneus
Greater Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus
Black-naped Monarch Hypothymis azurea
Asian Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi
Common Iora Aegithina tiphia
Green Iora Aegithina viridissima NT
Rufous-winged Philentoma Philentoma pyrhopterum
Maroon-breasted Philentoma Philentoma velatum NT
Large Woodshrike Tephrodornis gularis
Grey-chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias umbratilis NT
Grey-streaked Flycatcher Muscicapa griseisticta
Asian Brown Flycatcher Muscicapa dauurica
Verditer Flycatcher Eumyias thalassina
Pale Blue Flycatcher Cyonis unicolor
Bornean Blue Flycatcher Cyornis superbus
Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis
Oriental Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis
White-rumped Shama Copsychus malabaricus
Chestnut-naped Forktail Enicurus ruficapillus NT
Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis
Hill Myna Gracula religiosa
Velvet-fronted Nuthatch Sitta frontalis
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica
Pacific Swallow Hirundo tahitica
Black-and-white Bulbul Pycnonotus melanoleucos NT
Black-headed Bulbul Pycnonotus atriceps
Scaly-breasted Bulbul Pycnonotus squamatus NT
Puff-backed Bulbul Pycnonotus eutilotus NT
Yellow-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus goiavier
Olive-winged Bulbul Pycnonotus plumosus
Cream-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus simplex
Red-eyed Bulbul Pycnonotus brunneus
Spectacled Bulbul Pycnonotus erythropthalmos
Species Status
Grey-cheeked Bulbul Alophoixus bres
Yellow-bellied Bulbul Alophoixus phaeocephalus
Hairy-backed Bulbul Tricholestes criniger
Buff-vented Bulbul Iole olivacea NT
Streaked Bulbul Ixos malaccensis NT
Yellow-bellied Prinia Prinia flaviveniris
Dark-necked Tailorbird Orthotomus atrogularis
Rufous-tailed Tailorbird Orthotomus sericeus
Ashy Tailorbird Orthotomus ruficeps
Yellow-bellied Warbler Abroscopus superciliaris
White-chested Babbler Trichastotna rostratum NT
Ferruginous Babbler Trichastoma bicolour
Abbott's Babbler Malacocincla abbotti
Horsfield's Babbler Malacocincla sepiarium
Short-tailed Babbler Malacocincla malaccensis NT
Black-capped Babbler Pellorneum capistratum
Moustached Babbler Malacopteron magnirostre
Sooty-capped Babbler Malacopteron affine NT
Scaly-crowned Babbler Malacopteron cinereum
Rufous-crowned Babbler Malacopteron magnum NT
Chestnut-backed Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus montanus
Striped Wren Babbler Kenopia striata NT
Rufous-fronted Babbler Stachyris rufifrons
Grey-headed Babbler Stachyris poliocephala
Chestnut-rumped Babbler Stachyris maculata NT
Chestnut-winged Babbler Stachyris erythroptera
Striped Tit Babbler Macronous gularis
Fluffy-backed Tit Babbler Macronous ptilosus NT
Brown Fulvetta Alcippe brunneicauda NT
Chestnut-crested Yuhina Yuhina everetti RR
White-bellied Yuhina Yuhina zantholeuca
Yellow-breasted Flowerpecker Prionochilus maculatus
Scarlet-breasted Flowerpecker Prionochilus thoracicus NT
Orange-bellied Flowerpecker Dicaeum trigonostigma
Plain Sunbird Anthreptes simplex
Brown-throated Sunbird Anthreptes malacensis
Ruby-cheeked Sunbird Anthreptes singalensis
Purple-naped Sunbird Hypogramma hypogrammicum
Purple-throated Sunbird Nectarinia sperata
Copper-throated Sunbird Nectarinia calcostetha
Olive-backed Sunbird Nectarinia jugularis
Crimson Sunbird Aethopyga siparaja
Temminck's Sunbird Aethopyga temminckii
Little Spiderhunter Arachnothera longirostra
Thick-billed Spiderhunter Arachnothera crassirostris
Long-billed Spiderhunter Arachnothera robusta
Spectacled Spiderhunter Arachnothera flavigaster
Yellow-eared Spiderhunter Arachnothera chrysogenys
Grey-breasted Spiderhunter Arachnothera affinis
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus
Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava
Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
Dusky Munia Lonchura fuscans
Black-headed Munia Lonchura malacca
Key
VU = Vulnerable, NT = Near Threatened, RR = restricted-range
Forktail 21 (2005)
Ornithological assessment of the PT Daisy logging concession, Indonesia
59
APPENDIX 2
Near Threatened species recorded at PT Daisy
Crested Partridge Rollulus rouloul
A common resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Four males and a female, and a pair were seen in
the vicinity of transect 4 on 12 September.
Crested Fireback Lophura ignita
A common resident in the lowland forests throughout Borneo,
excluding peat swamp forest (Smythies 1999). Three females were
seen to cross a logging road near the HQ on 8 September.
Great Argus Argusianus argus
A common resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). It was commonly recorded, with 33 records,
mostly of calling birds, in both logged and primary forest.
Buff-necked Woodpecker Meiglyptes tukki
A common resident in the mixed dipterocarp forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). A single bird was seen on transect 7 on 15
September.
Red-crowned Barbet Megalaima rafflesii
A common resident in the lowlands in mixed dipterocarp (often
disturbed) forest from sea-level to 500 m (Smythies 1999). This
species was heard on 7 and 8 September and on transect 10 on 19
September.
Red-throated Barbet Megalaima mystacophanos
This species is an abundant lowland resident of primary mixed
dipterocarp forest and secondary forest from sea-level up to 1,375 m
(Smythies 1999). It was commonly recorded, with 16 records,
mainly of calling birds in primary forest-edge.
Yellow-crowned Barbet Megalaima henricii
A common submontane resident throughout Borneo in primary and
logged lowland forest (Smythies 1999). One was heard on transect 5
on 13 September.
Black Ilornbill Anthracoceros malayanus
Resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo, mainly below
600 m (Smythies 1999). Thirteen individuals were recorded during
7-27 September.
Rhinoceros Hombill Buceros rhinoceros
Resident throughout Borneo in hilly and lowland forest (Smythies
1999). Twenty-two were recorded during 7-27 September.
Helmeted Hornbill Buceros vigil
Resident throughout Borneo in lowland alluvial forest (Smythies
1999). Nineteen were recorded during 7-18 September. A male was
observed feeding a female at a nest hole at the end of transect 5 on
13 September and again on 26 September.
White-crowned Hornbill Aceros comatus
Resident at low density throughout Borneo in primary and logged
forest, mainly in hilly country but not often seen (Smythies 1999).
Five were recorded during 12-22 September.
Wrinkled Hombill Aceros corrugatus
Resident and sparsely distributed throughout Borneo in the lowlands
in primary forest from sea-level to 800 m (Smythies 1999). Nineteen
were recorded during 7-19 September.
Red-naped Trogon Harpactes kasumba
Resident throughout Borneo in primary forest, bamboo, and rarely
in logged forest if virgin patches are available nearby (Lambert 1990
in Smythies 1999). Three were recorded during 8-23 September.
Diard’s Trogon Harpactes diardi
Resident and fairly common throughout Borneo up to 1,200 m in
virgin and logged forest (Smythies 1999). Ten were recorded during
8- 26 September.
Scarlet-rumped Trogon Harpactes duvaucelii
A common resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). At least 16 were recorded during 9-26 September.
Moustached Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx vagans
A rare resident of lowland forest (Smythies 1999). One seen on
transect 8 on 17 September was being mobbed by two Chestnut-
crested Yuhinas Yuhina everetti.
Black-bellied Malkoha Phaenicophaeus diardi
Resident and usually common throughout the lowlands of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Three were seen during 9-21 September.
Chestnut-bellied Malkoha Phaenicophaeus sumatranus
A common resident of the lowlands, predominantly in coastal areas
up to 500 m (Smythies 1999). Two were seen together with three
Raffles’s Malkohas Phaenicophaeus chlorophaeus on transect 8 on 17
September.
Blue-rumped Parrot Psittinus cyanurus
Resident in virgin and logged forest up to about 500 m (Smythies
1999). One was seen along transect 3 on 1 1 September. Two flew
overhead along transect 5 on 13 September. One briefly visited a
fruiting fig tree near Camp C on 1 7 September. Two were seen on
transect 10 on 19 September.
Jambu Fruit Dove Ptilinopus jambu
Local resident but widely distributed in Borneo (Smythies 1999).
One male was seen near transect 4 on 12 September. A pair were
observed visiting a fruiting tree on transect 6 on 1 5 September.
Garnet Pitta Pina granatina
Resident in lowlands in mixed dipterocarp forest (Smythies 1999).
Nine were recorded during 7-27 September.
Black-and-yellow Broadbill Eurylaimus ochromalus
Resident throughout Borneo in the lowlands in primary forest
(Smythies 1999). Common at PT Daisy and recorded almost daily
throughout the survey.
Green Broadbill Calyptomena viridis
Resident throughout Borneo in mixed dipterocarp forest of the
lowlands (Smythies 1999). A minimum of 21 were recorded during
9- 27 September.
Lesser Green Leafbird Chloropsis cyanopogon
A common resident throughout the lowlnd forests of Borneo from
sea-level to about 600 m (Smythies 1999). Eleven were recorded
during 8-27 September.
Crested Jay Platylophus galericulatus
A common resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Five were recorded during 8-17 September.
Black Magpie Platysmurus leucopterus
A fairly common resident throughout the lowlands of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). At least eight were recorded during 10-18
September.
Dark-throated Oriole Oriolus xanthonotus
Resident throughout Borneo in the lowland forests, where it is the
only common lowland oriole (Smythies 1999). Eleven birds were
recorded during 13-26 September.
60
J. C. EAMES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Green lora Aegithina viridissima
A common resident species throughout the lowlands of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Fifteen birds were recorded during 10-27
September.
Maroon-breasted Philentoma Philentoma velatum
Resident throughout the lowland forests of Borneo (Smythies 1999).
A pair was seen on transect 8 on 17 September and one was seen on
transect 11 on 21 September.
Grey-chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias umbratilis
Resident throughout the lowlands of Borneo in primary and
disturbed forest (Smythies 1999). Six were recorded during 9-18
September.
Chestnut-naped Forktail Enicurus ruficapillus
Resident throughout lowland Borneo (Smythies 1999). One was
seen briefly along a stream in Block A on 21 September. Two were
seen on transect 12 on 23 September.
Black-and-white Bulbul Pycnonotus melanoleucos
Resident throughout the lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of Borneo
and in secondary forest (Smythies 1999). Around 18 birds were
recorded during 12-26 September.
Scaly-breasted Bulbul Pycnonotus squamatus
A rather rare submontane resident of primary forest (Smythies
1999). Singles were seen along transect 6 on 14 September and on
transect 7 on 14 and 15 September.
Puff-backed Bulbul Pycnonotus eutilotus
Sparsely distributed and resident in mixed dipterocarp forest up to
600 m throughout Borneo (Smythies 1999). At least eight were
recorded during 11-23 September.
Buff-vented Bulbul Iole olivacea
Resident in the lowlands of Borneo (Smythies 1999). At least ten
were recorded during 14-27 September.
Streaked Bulbul Ixos malaccensis
Resident in the lowlands of Borneo in primary and secondary forest,
and generally scarce (Smythies 1999). One was seen near Camp C
on 16 September.
White-chested Babbler Trichastoma rostratum
Resident and locally common throughout the lowland mixed dipte¬
rocarp forests of Borneo (Smythies 1999). Recorded daily during
19-23 September.
Short-tailed Babbler Malacocincla malaccensis
Resident and locally common throughout the lowlands of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Eight were recorded during 12-23 September.
Sooty-capped Babbler Malacopteron affine
A common resident in the lowland forest throughout Borneo from
sea-level to about 550 m (Smythies 1999). Recorded on 13 dates
during 8-27 September.
Rufous-crowned Babbler Malacopteron magnum
A common resident in the lowland forest throughout Borneo from
sea-level to about 600 m (Smythies 1999). Recorded on ten dates
during 10-26 September.
Striped Wren Babbler Kenopia striata
Distributed throughout the lowland forests of Borneo (Smythies
1999). Two were seen on transect 12 on 23 September.
Chestnut-rumped Babbler Stachyris maculata
Resident throughout the mixed dipterocarp forests of Borneo
(Smythies 1999). Ten were recorded during 8-27 September.
Fluffy-backed Tit Babbler Macronous ptilosus
Resident throughout Borneo in the lowlands (Smythies 1999).
Foutrteen were recorded during 10-26 September.
Brown Fulvetta Alcippe brunneicauda
Resident in primary forest throughout Borneo in the lowlands from
nearly sea-level to 1,200 m (Smythies 1999). Recorded on ten dates
during 9-26 September.
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 61-78
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste
(East Timor): status and distribution from surveys
in August 2002-December 2004
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Field surveys were carried out in 2002-2004 to assess the status, distribution and seasonality of waterbirds
and coastal seabirds in Timor-Leste. A total of 3,653 records of 82 waterbird and coastal seabirds were
collected during 446 visits to 74 wetland sites. Ten species new to Timor island were recorded: Green
Pygmy-goose Nettapus pulchellus , Hardhead Aythya australis , Ruddy-breasted Crake Porzana fusca, Spotless
Crake Porzana tabuensis (first Wallacean record since 1899), Common Coot Fulica atra, Greater Painted-
snipe Rostratula benghalensis, Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus (second record for Wallacea), Pectoral
Sandpiper Calidris melanotos (first record for Wallacea), Common Tern Sterna hirundo and Black-crowned
Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax. Significant populations of three Near Threatened species were recorded:
Beach Thick-knee Esacus neglectus, Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii and Darter Anhinga melanogaster.
Three wetlands are highlighted for their importance: (1) Lake Iralalara (c. 1,500 ha) is the most significant
freshwater site in Timor-Leste and Nusa Tenggara, supporting at least 50 waterbird species including large
populations of ducks and rails. It is an important staging site for Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
(c. 3,000 recorded in November 2004); (2) Tasitolu is a site of high national biodiversity significance with
53 waterbird and coastal seabird species recorded from its saline lakes and mudflats; (3) Kupang Bay in
West Timor is the most significant site for migratory waders in Nusa Tenggara. Regular monitoring of key
sites and further fieldwork are needed, especially along the south coast (Covalima, Manufahi and Manatuto
districts).
INTRODUCTION
Timor island comprises two nations. The western half
is Indonesian, with Kupang in the far south-west being
the provincial capital of the East Nusa Tenggara
province. The eastern half is the new nation of Timor-
Leste (East Timor), which gained independence in
2002. Timor is the second largest island in Wallacea,
with an area of c. 3 1,000 km2. Timor-Leste covers
c. 14,604 km2 including the Oecussi enclave, Atauro
island (150 km2) and Jaco island (8 km2).
The status and distribution of waterbirds on Timor
are poorly known because historical collections (e.g.
Mayr 1944) and recent field surveys (e.g. Noske and
Saleh 1996, Lesmana et al. 2000) have concentrated
on the endemic and threatened forest birds. Some
recent information has come from fieldwork in the
former Portuguese-controlled Timor (now Timor-
Leste) by McKean et al. (1975) and Thompson et al.
(1976), and in West Timor by Andrew (1986) and
Johnstone (1994; see Table 1), but considerable gaps in
our knowledge remain. Timor is on the East Asian
flyway for migratory shorebirds, lying on the migration
path for birds migrating south to Australia, and is
visited during the non-breeding season by various
Palearctic species during August-May (Asia-Pacific
Migratory Waterbird Conservation Committee 2001).
Northern Australia lies 650-1,000 km to the south of
Timor and is an important wintering area for tens of
thousands of Palearctic migrants (Chatto 2003, Barrett
et al. 2003). Most migrants overfly Wallacea andTimor,
but for some the area is significant for staging, feeding
and resting, with the sandflat, mudflat and fishpond
wetlands of Kupang Bay providing important habitat
(Johnstone 1994, Coates and Bishop 1997). In
addition, some Australian migrant shorebirds and
terns winter on Timor during May-December, and
some Australo-Papuan and Oriental waterbirds breed
on Timor or occur as regular visitors or vagrants
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Timor-Leste is currently developing strategies to
audit and manage its biodiversity resources. This
includes plans to evaluate and accede, where appropri¬
ate, to relevant international treaties and conventions,
including those covering wetland and waterbird
management and conservation (e.g. the Ramsar
Convention). All bird species are currently protected
under regulation 2000/19 (UNTAET 2000). The
oceanic islands of Nusa Tenggara are not renowned for
their wetlands, but recent surveys have identified
numerous, mostly small, freshwater and saline lakes,
river estuaries, beaches and reefs in Timor-Leste.
I carried out surveys for BirdLife International
during August 2002 to December 2004, concentrating
on forest habitats, but also in various wetland habitats
on ‘mainland’ Timor-Leste, the islands of Atauro and
Jaco and a brief survey of Kupang Bay. This paper
provides a summary of the status and distribution of
waterbirds in Timor-Leste based on these field surveys
and a synthesis of the literature covering Timor
(including West Timor, Roti and Sabu) and Wallacea. A
sister paper reviews the status of globally threatened
and restricted-range birds (Trainor and Mauro in
prep.).
METHODS
Waterbirds were recorded in Timor-Leste during six
field visits totalling 60 weeks over a 29 month period:
62
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
28 July to 23 August 2002, 22 January to 17 May 2003,
25 July to 5 August 2003, 23 October 2003 to 20
January 2004, 20 February to 8 June 2004 and 1
September to 8 December 2004. Wetlands at Kupang
Bay (10°05'S 123°45'E), West Timor, were visited on
10-12 June 2004. Lakes, mudflats, exposed reefs,
beaches and rivers were surveyed throughout Timor-
Leste, particularly along the accessible north coast and
the far east of the island (Lautem district).
Opportunistic observations from roadsides of
ricefields, streams and beaches were also documented
and these localities have also been called ‘wetland
sites’. A list of all sites, their location, estimated area,
elevation and number of occasions surveyed is given in
Appendix 2. Most wetlands were small or very small.
Only one — Lake Iralalara — was greater than 1 0 km2; 1 3
sites were larger than 1 km2 and 63 sites were smaller
than 50 ha (Appendix 2).
Birds were observed with 8x32 binoculars and
identified with the direct aid of a field guide where
necessary (Coates and Bishop 1997). Observations of
presence, number of individuals, habitat type, ecology
including breeding activity, altitude (measured with a
Suunto wristwatch to the nearest 10 m), location
(latitude and longitude measured with a Garmin global
positioning system [GPS]; specific site; village and
district name) and date were written in a notebook, or
stored on GPS. Each bird record was assigned a
‘precise location name’ associated with a GPS reading.
These were then lumped into geographically
‘independent sites’ which included all precise locations
within an area with a radius of 2-3 km. For one larger
wetland (Lake Iralalara; at least 1 5 km2) the entire area
was defined as one site although many precise locali¬
ties, including the Irasequiro river, were surveyed
within it.
IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife
International (2004). Geographic localities have not
yet been standardised in Timor-Leste (with combina¬
tions of local, Indonesian, Portuguese and Tetun
language names). I have either followed the Indonesian
Peta Ruppabumi 1:25,000 maps, or used the nearest
village name to the wetland type (e.g. Los Palos
Swamp), or used the village name with local site names
(collected from local people who wrote them in a
notebook). Lake Laga was called Salina (or erroneously
Saltina) de Laga, and Lake Iralalara was called Los
Palos Lake or Swamp by McKean et al. (1975) and
Thompson et al. (1976).
The residence status of species was assessed by
synthesising information on: (1) the seasonal frequency
of survey records; (2) records in the literature; and (3)
new or historical information on breeding (including
information from local people). Migrants were
categorised as ‘wintering’ if they were recorded over
periods of weeks or months (during August-May for
Palearctic migrants and May-December for Australian
migrants), ‘transient’ if they were recorded (generally
in tight flocks) on a few occasions for periods of one
Figure 1. Map of study sites in Timor-Leste. Numbers refer to sites listed in Appendix 2.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
63
Table 1. Summary of literature on waterbirds on Timor, including estimated field effort for primary surveys (n/a= not applicable).
Reference
Notes
Field effort
Mayr (1944)
McKean et al. (1975),
Thompson et al. (1976)
Mees (1976)
Andrew (1986)
White and Bruce (1986)
Holmes (1993)
Johnstone (1994)
Johnstone and Jepson (1996)
Noske and Ueda (1996)
Verbelen (1996)
Coates and Bishop (1997)
Grantham (2000a)
Trainor and Soares (2004)
Olsen and Trainor (2005)
Trainor (2005)
Annotated bird list describing Stem’s 1931-1932 records in West and East Timor
List of waterbirds and other species recorded in East Timor (in 1973-1975)
Clarification of the status of several records of McKean et al. (1975)
Summary of significant bird records mostly from Kupang Bay, West Timor
Summary and annotated list of birds ofWallacea including Timor
Unpublished annotated list of bird records from the Lasiana beach area of
Kupang Bay
Summary of seabird and shorebird records from NusaTenggara and Maluku
including Merah island off Semau island, and Kera island in Kupang Bay
Review of birds on Roti, off south-west Timor
First Cmnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus record for Timor
Summary of observations at Kupang Bay, West Timor, during 6-8 October 1995
Synthesis of information on status and habitat use of waterbirds in Wallacean region
Record of Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus from Dili area
Summary of bird records from Atauro island
Description of the Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus nesting on Timor in 2003
Review of recent waterbird records from Roti island
22 weeks
c.45 days
n/a
10 weeks
n/a
c. 1 month over 2-year period
c.12 months over 7-year
period
17 days
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
1 2 days over 6-month period
c.10 days
8 days
day to several weeks, and ‘summering’ if recorded in
the month of June and July.
RESULTS
A total of 3,653 records of 82 waterbird and coastal
seabirds were collected during 446 visits to 74 wetland
sites on 293 field days. Ten waterbirds new to Timor
Table 2. The ten most common waterbird and coastal seabirds
recorded in Timor-Leste and the ten most common migrant waders
(denoted with *).
Species No. records
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos* 276
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia* 173
Black- winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus 158
Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus 155
Lutle Pied Cormorant Phalacrocorax melanoleucos 151
Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis 144
Little Black Cormorant Phalacrocorax sulcirostris 136
Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii 128
Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis* 123
Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis * 118
Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus 114
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva * 106
Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola * 104
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus 101
Little Egret Egretta garzetta 100
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus* 93
Great Egret Casmerodius albus 92
Sharp-tailed Sandpiper Calidris acuminata* 77
Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis* 52
Grey-tailed Tattler Heteroscelus brevipes * 51
island were recorded: Green Pygmy-goose Nettapus
pulchellus , Hardhead Aythya australis , Ruddy-breasted
Crake Porzana fusca, Spotless Crake Porzana tabuensis,
Common Coot Fulica atm, Greater Painted-snipe
Rostratula benghalensis. Spotted Redshank Tringa
erythropus , Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos.
Common Tern Sterna hirundo and Black-crowned
Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax. Three Near
Threatened species were recorded (Beach Thick-knee
Esacus neglectus , Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii
and Darter Anhinga melanogaster) . The most
widespread and common birds are listed in Table 2.
The annotated list documents all waterbirds
recorded during the 2002-2004 surveys, summarising
their distribution, seasonality (months and extreme
dates) and breeding. Appendix 1 lists all species and
provides a summary of residence status, abundance,
habitat use and sites.
Wandering Whistling-duck Dendrocygna arcuata
This species is a locally common breeding resident on
freshwater lakes and swamps throughout Timor-Leste.
It was mostly observed as pairs and small parties, but
at least 120 individuals were seen on Lake Iralalara and
60 on Lake Seloi (both in December 2003). A pair with
eight chicks was recorded on Lake Eraulo on 28
February 2004.
Green Pygmy-goose Nettapus pulchellus
New island record. Green Pygmy Goose is a regular
visitor to Timor-Leste from Australia, with up to 35
birds at Lake Iralalara (October-November 2004,
mostly recorded in pairs and possibly breeds at this
site), one at Chaiperi swamp on 28 May 2004, and up
to two at Lake Farapata on 5 October 2004. The only
possible confusion species is Cotton Pygmy-goose N.
coromandelianus (which has not been recorded from
Nusa Tenggara); the birds were small and males had
the distinctive white cheek-patches diagnostic of Green
64
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Pygmy Goose. There have been fewWallacean records
of this species (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Pacific Black Duck Anas superciliosa
A locally common to abundant resident and visitor of
freshwater lakes and rivers, this species was mostly
observed in small flocks of <50 individuals. In the 2003
dry season, some of the largest congregations recorded
in Wallacea were observed: 1,000-1,740 birds at Lake
Iralalara on 15 November-11 December 2003, 270
birds at Lake Eraulo on 5 November 2003, and 200
birds at Lake Seloi on 27 November 2003. One adult
with five juveniles was observed at Lake Seloi on 28
February 2004. Johnstone and Jepson (1996) reported
120 birds on Roti in September 1993.
Sunda Teal Allas gibberifrons
This is a common species in Timor-Leste, with up to
400 birds recorded on saline lakes, beaches, exposed
reefs, mangrove-lined mudflats, and, rarely, freshwater
lakes. It is presumably a breeding resident on Timor.
Garganey Anas querquedula
On 29 February and 26 March 2004, two females or
eclipse males (presumably the same individuals on
both dates) were seen at Lake Laga. The only previous
Timor record was of a male in eclipse plumage at Secal
on 25 October 1973 (McKean et al. 1975). Garganey is
a rare Palearctic visitor to Timor and Nusa Tenggara
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Hardhead Aythya australis
New island record. This species is a regular visitor
throughout the year to Timor, usually in small numbers
at shallow saline and inland freshwater lakes, e.g. Lake
Iralalara (four birds on 4 March 2003, 3-20 birds in
October 2004, c.100 birds on 30 November 2004),
Lake Laga (three on 2-4 April 2003), Tasitolu (one
male on 14 April 2003), and Lake Veihoorana (five
males on 1 5 January 2004). These birds were identified
by their large size (similar to Pacific Black Duck),
uniform dark brown to blackish appearance, and white
iris (in males) which was visible when observed with
binoculars from less than c.50 m. In flight, the broad
white band along the length of the upperwing was
distinctive and allowed this species to be distinguished
in large mixed-species duck flocks (usually including
Pacific Black Duck and Wandering Whistling Duck).
Coates and Bishop (1997) noted three records of single
males in Wallacea; in addition, two small groups were
recently reported from Lombok (Grantham 2000b),
and there are recent records on Flores: ten birds at
Tiwu Bowu lake in August-September 1998 and
October 2002 (R. Drijvers verbally 1998, M.
Schellekens verbally 2003).
Buff-banded Rail Gallirallus philippensis
This species was widespread and common on the
Fuiloro plateau, but it remains poorly known
elsewhere. One was recorded at Tasitolu on 3
December 2004.
White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus
This species is a locally common breeding resident at
springs, freshwater lakes and wet grassland, particularly
in Lautem district. It was usually observed as singles or
pairs, but six birds were recorded at a Baucau spring on
24 November 2003.
Ruddy-breasted Crake Porzana fusca
New island record. A single was video-recorded at Lake
Iralalara on 10 October 2004; one was captured by
dogs at Ili Lapa on 17 October 2004 (the specimen will
be lodged with the Australian Museum), and two birds
were observed at nearby O’Swamp on 23 October
2004. No similar-looking rails are currently known
from Timor island, and the extensive video footage (10
minutes) and specimen enabled confirmation of the
identification by direct reference to Coates and Bishop
(1997). There are few records from Nusa Tenggara,
where this bird is otherwise known only from Flores
and Sumba (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Spotless Crake Porzana tabuensis
New island record. One bird was flushed from wet
grass and killed by young men with sticks (a regular
technique to hunt quail) at Lake Veihoorana on 15
January 2004. The specimen was taken to Australia
with the intention of submitting to a museum, but was
unfortunately destroyed by customs. One to three birds
were regularly observed (and video-recorded) at
O’Swamp in October-December 2004. The birds were
very small (smaller than Ruddy-breasted Crake, which
was seen together with Spotless Crake on one
occasion), with reddish legs, black bill and white bars
on the under tail-coverts. Birds were heard to give blup
or blip calls, which sounded like water dropping into a
basin. These are the first records since 1899 in
Wallacea, where it is otherwise known only from Tiur
island, Maluku (Coates and Bishop 1997).
White-browed Crake Porzana cinerea
White-browed Crake was locally common in Lautem
district, especially at Lake Iralalara, but probably more
widely. Two birds were seen at a Dili spring on 1 2 May
2004. Stein also collected five birds from the Dili area
(Mayr 1944); Verbelen (1996) observed one at Kupang
Bay, and Thompson et al. (1976) had a possible record
from Lake Iralalara.
Purple Swamphen Porphyria porphyrio
This species was locally common at Lake Iralalara (2 1
birds were counted in a small section of the lake, and
an estimated 100-200 birds were present), but it was
recorded at just two other sites: Lake Modo Mahut and
O’Swamp.
Dusky Moorhen Gallinula tenebrosa
This species was locally common at Lake Modo Mahut
and Lake Iralalara (where up to seven individuals were
regularly observed). Immatures were recorded along
the Irasequiro river in December 2003 and October
2004. Verbelen (1996) noted two birds at Kupang Bay.
Common Coot Fulica atra
New island record. This species was recorded at three
wetlands: Lake Eraulo (ten birds on 5 February 2003,
37 birds on 5 November 2003, none on 28 February
2004, and four birds on 19 October 2004), Lake Modo
Mahut (six birds on 13 March 2003) and Lake Seloi
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
65
(at least 20 birds on 26 July, two on 27 November, ten
on 17 December 2003, two on 28 February 2004 and
eight on 15 September 2004). The white bill and
frontal shield of this otherwise all-black bird was
diagnostic; birds at Lake Eraulo were observed from as
close as 1 5 m and photographed to confirm identifica¬
tion. This bird was considered a ‘rare vagrant to
Wallacea’ by Coates and Bishop (1997), but it is
probably a regular visitor to Timor, with local people
suggesting that it breeds locally.
Swinhoe’s Snipe Gallinago megala
This species was locally abundant at O’Swamp and
Lake Iralalara, where up to 40 birds per hour could be
flushed. This species winters in significant numbers in
Timor-Leste, especially on the Fuiloro plateau, but it
was scarce in apparently suitable habitat at other sites.
All snipe were assumed to be this species. Trapping or
specimen collection would be needed to confirm the
presence of Pintail Snipe G. stenura or other snipe
species which have yet to be recorded from Timor.
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa
This migrant is an uncommon or rare transient with six
records of 1-35 individuals in September-December
and February. Andrew (1986) recorded 188 on 30
September 1985 at Kupang Bay, where it is a common
winter visitor. Black-tailed Godwit was unrecorded by
Johnstone (1994), but it is a common winter migrant to
Australia (Barrett et al. 2003).
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica
This species is an uncommon transient in small
numbers (1-6 individuals) on saline lakes, mudflats
and aquaculture ponds during August-April. McKean
et al. (1975) reported four birds at Secal, and Johnstone
(1994) recorded 16 at Panite, West Timor.
Little Curlew Numenius minutus
This Australian winter migrant was a rare brief
transient on Timor, with only a few records at Lake
Iralalara (six birds on 11 December 2003), Tasitolu (a
single bird on 7 February 2003, and four on 9 May
2003; presumably these birds were returning north),
and Lake Laga (two on 29 February 2004). Previous
published records are from September to November
and in mid-April (Coates and Bishop 1997). The first
Timor record was of 12 birds at Secal on 28 October
1973 (McKean et al. (1975). Mauro (1999) recorded
16-40 birds at Kai Kecil on 20-21 October 1998; these
birds were presumably staging. Verbelen (1996)
recorded seven birds at Kupang Bay, and Johnstone
(1994) reported an April record from Selaru island
(Tanimbar).
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus
This species is a common winter visitor and an
uncommon transient, mostly recorded as singles or
small loose parties of 1-15 birds in August-May.
Larger flocks, presumably representing birds on return
from Australia, included 22 and 1 1 birds at Vero river
estuary on 25 March 2003 and 65 birds at Tasitolu on
7 May 2003. A total of 19 birds were observed at
Kupang Bay on 10-12 June 2004, and Verbelen (1996)
reported 20 at Kupang Bay.
Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis
This migrant was a regular winter visitor on larger
expanses of mudflats and estuaries in August-June, and
occurred as a transient in small numbers (1-26 birds)
on beaches and saline lakes. Ten birds at Kupang Bay
on 12 June 2004 represents the latest record for
Wallacea. It was not recorded by Johnstone (1994).
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus
New island record. At least three birds were video-
recorded at Tasitolu on 5 September (when overlooked
as Common Redshank Tringa totanus ) and were subse¬
quently confirmed as Spotted Redshank (by M.
Schellekens, A. Vrielink and M. Carter verbally 2005).
The footage shows a tall, red-legged shank (10-15%
shorter than Common Greenshank T. nebularia in
direct comparison); the upper body was grey-brown,
indicating a bird in winter plumage. The well-devel¬
oped supercilium, clean white underparts, long-legged
appearance and long (about 140% of head length) fine-
tipped and slightly curved bill exclude the
similar-looking Common Redshank. The birds fed at
the muddy shore with a broad sweeping action similar
to Royal Spoonbill. Ten redshanks were present on this
date and up to six remained in the following two weeks,
but it is not known whether the other birds were
Common or Spotted Redshanks (Common Redshank
had not previously been observed at this section of
Lake Tasitolu). Spotted Redshank is a Palearctic
migrant which usually winters in Africa through to
continental South-East Asia (Hayman et al. 1986). It is
apparently rare in Wallacea or is possibly overlooked.
This is the second record for Wallacea following a
record of one bird on 31 August on Sangihe island
(Riley 1997). The first record for the Philippines was in
February 1987 (Hornskov 1995), and there are very
few records for Australia (Carter and Sudbury 1993).
Spotted Redshank might occur regularly on Timor, and
should be looked for especially in the period of south¬
ward migration.
Common Redshank Tringa totanus
This species was generally uncommon in small
numbers on mangrove-backed mudflats, with a total of
43 records. The largest group was of 27 birds at Lake
Laga on 29 February. At least 20 birds were reported
from Secal on 28 October 1973 (McKean et al. 1975),
with additional records from Lasiana beach on 20
October 1993 (Holmes 1993), and two at Kupang Bay
(Verbelen 1996). This species occurs on Timor during
passage and when wintering from September to mid-
April.
Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis
This migrant was a common winter visitor, especially
on shallow saline lakes during July-May, but published
dates range from September to April (Coates and
Bishop 1997). Tasitolu was used for staging by small
groups on their northward migration, with 64 birds
recorded on 26 February 2004, 58 on 2 March 2004
and 59 on 5 April 2004.
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia
This species is a common winter (and probably
summer) visitor and occasional transient. The increas-
66
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
ing number of birds at Lake Laga in April, and at
Tasitolu in March-April (e.g. 66 birds on 31 March
and 156 on 16 April 2003) suggests that these locations
are used as staging sites by birds returning northwards
from Australia. Eighteen birds were observed at
Kupang Bay on 10-12 June 2004, suggesting that small
numbers summer on Timor.
Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola
This species was a regular winter migrant and
occasional transient in small loose parties or moderate¬
sized groups on freshwater and saline lakes and
mudflats. The flock of 40 birds present at Lake Seloi on
17 December 2003 was presumably a group of
transients. Small numbers of birds staged at Tasitolu
prior to their return migration, with one present on 28
November 2003, 72 birds on 26 February, 51 on 31
March and one on 10 April 2004. Verbelen (1996)
reported ‘hundreds’ from Kupang Bay.
Terek Sandpiper Xenus cinereus
This species was an irregular visitor to Timor-Leste
with records of 1-8 birds from 12 September to 9
November 2004 during the period of southward migra¬
tion. McKean et al. (1975) noted 1-20 birds at Secal
on 24-28 October 1973 and Holmes (1993) observed
seven birds at Lasiana beach on 9 July 1993.
Additionally, three single birds were observed at
Kupang Bay, 10-12 June 2004. Terek Sandpipers
winter in Australia in large numbers with some birds
summering (Barrett et al. 2003).
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
This common and widespread migrant occurred on
beaches, estuaries, inland rivers and lakes during
July-May, usually as singles and small loose parties of
up to 15 birds.
Grey-tailed Tattler Heteroscelus brevipes
This species was a widespread and regular winter
visitor, generally occurring in small parties of 1-20
birds except at mangrove-backed mudflats or estuaries
where up to 50 birds were occasionally recorded.
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria inter pres
This migrant is generally a rare transient in the Timor
region, with just live records of 1-8 birds from 17
August to 23 March. Most birds undoubtedly overfly
Timor while on route to wintering grounds in
Australia. The first Timor records were two birds at
Secal on 28 October 1973 and four at Waitala on 26
November 1973 (McKean er al. 1975). There are few
other records: Holmes (1993) recorded the species
regularly in small numbers at Lasiana beach, Johnstone
(1994) saw three birds on 7 April 1991 at Kera island,
and Johnstone and Jepson (1996) recorded the species
on Roti island during 7-16 October 1990.
Great Knot Calidris tenuirostris
This wader is a rare transient and occasional short¬
term visitor in the Timor region, with the possible
exception of Kupang Bay, where a record of 13 birds
on 10 June 2004 (the latest record for Wallacea)
suggests summering. Records spanned
September-December and were from Dili foreshore
(one on 31 October to 4 November 2003), Manututo
mudflats (two on 19 September 2004), Secal (one on
19 September 2004), Tasitolu (one on 12 November to
16 December), Raumoko river (one on 1 1 October
2004), Tasitolu (Dili sewerage works: one on 1
November), and Lake Iralalara (one on 15 November).
The first Timor records were of 1-4 birds at Secal on
24-28 October 1973 (McKean et al. 1975). Great Knot
was unrecorded by Johnstone (1994). Flocks of
5,000-10,000 birds winter in northern Australia
(Chatto 2003).
Red Knot Calidris canutus
This species is a rare transient in the region, with a
single bird video-recorded at Tasitolu on 24 September
2004. Andrew (1986) reported at least 18 birds at
Kupang Bay on 5 September. There are very few
Wallacean records (Coates and Bishop 1997, R
Benstead inTrainor et al. in press), but many thousands
winter in northern Australia (Barrett et al. 2003,
Chatto 2003).
Sanderling Calidris alba
This species was uncommon in the Timor region. Most
records were of singles, but a flock of 56 birds was seen
at the Loes estuary on 5 December 2004. The first
Timor record was of a single bird at Kupang Bay on 24
September 1985 (Andrew 1986). Sanderling winters
regularly in Australia but it is uncommon, with an
estimated wintering population of 8,000 birds (Chatto
2003).
Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis
Red-necked Stint is a common migrant that winters in
small to moderately large flocks from August to May.
The largest flocks were of 190 birds at Lake Laga on 14
November 2003, 215 birds at Tasitolu on 29 December
2003, and 150 birds at Tasitolu on 2 January 2004. An
estimated 400 birds were present on 10-12 June 2004
at Kupang Bay, where this species probably summers
in small numbers. The species is a very common winter
visitor in Australia (Chatto 2003).
Long-toed Stint Calidris subminuta
This species was a generally uncommon winter migrant
to Timor-Leste. Singles and groups of up to five birds
were occasionally Hushed from the muddy margins of
Lake Iralalara, Lake Eraulo and O’Swamp, and
hundreds of birds probably winter on the Fuiloro
plateau. Forty-five birds were recorded in shallow
marshland and flooded ricefields at Secal on 19
September 2004. Verbelen (1996) recorded several at
Kupang Bay. The species is a rare winter visitor to
Australia (Chatto 2003, Barrett et al. 2003).
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos
New island record. A single Pectoral Sandpiper was
video-recorded on the muddy shore of Lake Laga at
12hl5-13hl5 on 28 November 2004, feeding together
with nine Sharp-tailed Sandpipers C. acuminata ,
Common Greenshank and Marsh Sandpiper. The bird
was initially thought to be a Ruff Philomachus pugnax.
No description was taken at the time, but 14 minutes
of video-recordings were made in overcast conditions,
on which the following description is based. The bird
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
67
was subsequently re-identified as Pectoral Sandpiper
by N. McCrie (verbally 2005). The most likely confu¬
sion species is Sharp-tailed Sandpiper. The bird was a
little larger and longer-necked than Sharp-tailed
Sandpiper and stood 1-2 cm taller. When alarmed, it
stood erect with its neck at full stretch and was c.5 cm
taller than Sharp-tailed Sandpiper. The crown, back
and wings were light brown-grey, and this was a little
lighter than on Sharp-tailed Sandpiper. The secondar¬
ies and primaries had darker centres, but these were
significantly less contrasting than in Sharp-tailed
Sandpiper (and indicated non-breeding plumage). The
bill was light yellow near the base and grey towards the
tip (visible only in close-ups), in contrast to the grey
bill of Sharp-tailed Sandpiper. It was slightly decurved
and about the same as the head length (and therefore
similar to Sharp-tailed Sandpiper). The legs were light
grey, rather than greenish as in Sharp-tailed Sandpiper.
The sharp boundary between the brown-streaked chest
and the white belly was the most prominent feature
distinguishing it from Sharp-tailed Sandpiper, in which
the brown-grey streaks on the chest continued down to
the belly, with no clear border. The supercilium was
well-developed but was thicker in front of the eye,
rather than behind the eye in Sharp-tailed Sandpiper
(and this was noticeable from distances of less than 20
m). Both species pecked and probed in shallow water
and mud at the lakes edge, but Sharp-tailed Sandpiper
occasionally fed in shallow water up to the upper tibia.
No sandpipers or shanks were present at Lake Laga on
2 December 2004. This is the first record forWallacea;
the species usually winters in South America and is a
rare vagrant to South and South-East Asia (Hayman et
al. 1986, Undeland and Sangha 2002) and is an
uncommon but widespread winter migrant to Australia
(Barrett et al. 2003).
Sharp-tailed Sandpiper Calidris acuminata
This migrant is a regular winter visitor, probable
summer visitor, and transient on Timor with up to 25
birds recorded on mudflats and the edges of saline and
freshwater lakes. Six birds were present at Kupang Bay
on 10 June 2004. Previously published Wallacean
records are from August-November, with one in April
(Coates and Bishop 1997), but records in Timor now
span all months.
Curlew Sandpiper Calidris f err uginea
This species was an uncommon and irregular transient
to Timor-Leste, with the first records comprising 1-4
birds on 1-23 September 2004. At Kupang Bay, it is
apparently common with 180 birds counted (and a
total of 450 birds estimated) on 30 September 1985
(Andrew 1996). Twenty-eight birds were recorded at
Kupang Bay fishponds on 12 June 2004. Two were
observed at Lasiana beach on 5 December 1991
(Holmes 1993). This species is a regular winter migrant
to Australia (Barrett et al. 2003).
Broad-billed Sandpiper Limicola falcinellus
This shorebird is a rare migrant to the Timor area, with
a single record of 16 birds atTasitolu on 2 March 2003.
The first Timor record was a single at Secal on 28
October 1973 (McKean et al. 1975), and Johnstone
(1994) recorded two at Panite on 26 October 1990.
White (1975) only listed two Wallacean records. This
species is rare in Australia, with an estimated 8,000
birds wintering (Barrett et al. 2003, Chatto 2003).
Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus
This species is common winter migrant to waters off
Timor: a total of 897 birds were observed between Dili
and Atauro island during a number of trips (Trainor
and Soares 2004). Flocks of 5,000-10,000 individuals
have been noted between nearby Pantar and Alor
islands (Johnstone 1994).
Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis
New island record. A female was flushed at Lake
Iralalara on 15 November 2003, and a single unsexed
bird was flushed at Bauro (Lake Ira Arapho) on 1 5
January 2004. Up to 30 birds of both sexes were
flushed from 2 ha of marshland during a morning and
afternoon visit to O’Swamp on 29 October 2004 (the
day after the first rains of the 2004-2005 wet season).
Birds were first noticed after several were flushed by a
young man with a dog. I entered the swamp near the
path of the young hunter and slowly walked through
knee-high mud and water. In this section of swamp,
birds were flushed as singles and loose groups of up to
ten birds. They typically flew 20-50 m, often flying in
an arc initially away and then turning and landing in
front of me. This allowed repeated but brief observa¬
tions of males and females showing the distinctive
white eye-ring and white streak behind the eye on a
rufous or greyish head, and the white ‘harness’ between
the grey-brown wing and shoulder. These features
clearly identified the birds as Greater Painted-snipe.
On the same day and the following week I spent about
two hours attempting to video-record the species, but
was unsuccessful and never saw birds before they
flushed (sometimes as close as 2-3 m). Birds were
silent when flushed, in contrast to Swinhoe’s Snipe
which almost always gave an etch or eck call. This incon¬
spicuous species has been overlooked on Timor but it
is presumably a widespread breeding species on the
Fuiloro plateau. Breeding in the region has been
documented only on Flores, but there are also records
from Lombok and Sumbawa (Verheijen 1964, Coates
and Bishop 1997). This is the most south-eastern
population of Greater Painted-snipe because the
Australian population is now considered a separate
species (Lane and Rogers 2000, D. Rogers verbally
2005).
Comb-crested Jacana Irediparra gallinacea
This species was locally common at Lake Modo Mahut
and Lake Iralalara, where up to 20 birds were recorded
and c.100 birds estimated on waterlily-lined wetlands.
Four juveniles were noted at Iralalara on 12 December
2003. There are few records of Comb-crested Jacana in
NusaTenggara (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Beach Thick-knee Esacus neglectus
Near Threatened. This species was relatively common,
with records from nine sites mostly in the extreme far
east: Secal (a pair), Ochalafai (a single), Valu Beach (a
pair and a single), Helapuna Beach (a pair), Uatu Lari
68
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
(a single), Vero (a pair), Lore (a pair) and nearby
Namulutu River Estuary (a pair). Beach Thick-knee
occurs as a resident at low population densities, but
significant populations remain on Timor-Leste. This
species probably prefers remoter and less-visited
beaches, but the records at Secal indicates that it can
tolerate areas used heavily by local communities.
McKean et al. (1975) reported four birds on Jaco island
in October 1973, but none was recorded during four
visits in 2002-2003. Johnstone (1994) recorded four
birds on Merah island.
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus
This species was locally common to abundant at the
margins of shallow saline and freshwater lakes,
mudflats and estuaries, with records from all months. It
is probably a breeding resident: two immatures were
recorded at Kupang Bay on 12 June 2004, where
Verbelen (1996) had previously observed juveniles. At
Tasitolu, numbers increased from 110 birds on 5 April
to 338 on 1 1 May 2003; 129 were recorded at Lake
Seloi on 27 November 2003 and 200 were seen at Lake
Seloi on 17 December 2003. The rapid rise and fall of
numbers may indicate that Black-winged Stilts use
these sites for staging on their way to Australia or other
areas.
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva
This shorebird was a regular on passage and in winter,
and was generally recorded in small numbers at coastal
wetlands and inland lakes. The largest group recorded
was of 52 birds at Lake Eraulo on 5 November 2003.
Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola
This species was less common than Pacific Golden
Plover and it was generally recorded as singles or a
small parties along beaches. About 100 individuals
were present on short grass on the floodplain at Lake
Iralalara on 13 December 2003.
Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius
This plover was a regular but uncommon visitor to
Timor, with seven records at Loes estuary (one on 18
September and probably the same bird on 25
September 2004), Manatuto (one on 14 December),
Tasitolu (two on 20 December 2004, one on 17 May
2004, and three on 6 December 2004) and Lore (two
groups of three on 3 April 2003). The first Timor
records were of twos and threes at Secal and Lake Laga
on 24-28 October 1973 (McKean et al. 1975). This
species was unrecorded by Johnstone (1994). It occurs
relatively frequently in NusaTenggara (personal obser¬
vations), but it is a rare visitor to nearby Australia
(Barrett 2003, Chatto 2003).
Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus
This species is a locally common breeding resident on
mudflats associated with saline lakes and aquaculture
ponds, with nests noted at Tasitolu in 2003 (Olsen and
Trainor 2005) and 2004. A pair was observed mating at
Taitolu on 13 May 2004; one young chick was noted on
17 May 2004, and a nest with one egg was
photographed and an immature bird were seen on 4
June 2004. Another fledgling was observed at Secal on
30 April 2004. A nest with two eggs was photographed
at Kupang Bay on 10 June 2004. This nest was
protected by the peeled bark of a log beside a dry
fishpond. Groups of up to 66 individuals were regularly
observed, and 240-300 birds were recorded at Tasitolu
on 31 December 2003 to 4 January 2004. At Kupang
Bay, 217 birds were counted in c.800 ha of mudflats on
10-12 June 2004. Just six previous Wallacean records
were listed by Coates and Bishop (1997). In addition,
Verbelen (1996) noted at least ten at Kupang Bay.
Previous authors have considered this species to be an
Australian winter migrant or vagrant (Mayr 1944,
Johnstone 1994, Coates and Bishop 1997).
Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii
Near Threatened. This plover is an uncommon but
widespread resident beach-dweller along the coast of
Timor-Leste, with records from 14 sites: Loes river
estuary (three pairs), Comoro estuary (two pairs),
Secal (two pairs and a single), Tua Koin (2-3 birds);
Atekru (a pair); Manatuto (a pair); Baucau beach (two
pairs), Com (1-3 birds), Irebere estuary (a pair); Laga
beach (a pair), Lore-Namulutu (a single and a pair),
Namulutu estuary (a single), Vero (three pairs), and
Waiara river estuary (one female). A pair was also
recorded at Kupang Bay on 12 June 2004.
Lesser Sand Plover Charadrius mongolus
This species was a regular but widespread migrant of
beaches, estuaries and mudflats, and it was probably
only present as a rapid transient on route to and from
Australia (in August-December and March- April).
Most records were of small parties, but 70 birds were
observed at Lake Laga on 14 November 2003. There
was one inland record at Lake Iralalara on 18
November 2004.
Greater Sand Plover Charadrius leschenaultii
This species was an uncommon winter visitor, with
records from exposed reef, beaches, estuaries, mudflat
and short grass in September-April. It was typically
recorded in small parties of fewer than ten birds, but 40
were present at Lake Laga on 16 February 2003. There
are surprisingly few other records for the Timor region
(Thompson et al. 1976, Johnstone 1994).
Oriental Plover Charadrius veredus
This species occurs regularly on Timor during the
southward migration and probably stages at some sites
in small numbers. There were 34 records of 1-95 birds
from 23 September to 7 February at the edge of fresh¬
water lakes, swamps, saline lakes, and fallow ricefields.
Remarkably, there were more records of this species
than both Lesser and Greater Sand Plovers. At the
Assalaino pass (500 m), this species probably stages in
small numbers (to 100 birds) on karst shrubland. It
was regularly observed in central Dili at the former
United Nations heliport. Oriental Plover has been
regularly recorded at Kai Kecil: Mauro (1999)
reported up to five birds on 21 October 1998, and
Kuhn collected this species repeatedly (Hartert 1901,
White 1975). Johnstone (1994) recorded a single bird
at Sabu island on 29 September 1990. Oriental Plover
has been considered a rare transient in Wallacea
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
69
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
Small numbers of Oriental Pratincole were observed at
several sites in 2003, but in November 2004 large
numbers staged at Assalaino pass and Lake Iralalara,
before migrating to wintering grounds in Australia.
During 17-19 November, small to large groups
(3-1,500 birds) were observed at Lake Iralalara resting
in short grass, or feeding swallow-like over the flood-
plain and surrounding woodland in the late afternoon.
On 18 November, a flock of c. 1,500 birds was observed
at 12h30-13h30, feeding in compact groups, and
spiralling upwards in thermals. Groups of up to 500
birds were observed feeding over an area of about
5 km2 and resting on short grass amongst karst
limestone at Assalaino pass (500 m) in the late after¬
noon on 24 and 25 November. At dusk, groups were
observed flying towards Lake Iralalara (15 km to the
south-east) with other birds returning from that direc¬
tion. On 26 November, a group of about 1,000 birds
flew high (>1,000 m) and were then lost amongst
approaching storm clouds; other groups of 400-500
were observed later in the day. On 28 November, nine
birds were seen flying south-east at Raumoko (30 km
west of Assalaino pass) and 100 birds were observed
feeding low over fallow ricefields in Los Palos. Lake
Iralalara was visited again on 29 November, and
c. 2, 500-3, 000 birds were video-recorded as they flew
in compact groups and rode thermals at 13h00. The
following day no birds were present. It is likely that the
1,000 birds from Assalaino had joined the Lake
Iralalara group, and on 29 or 30 November they all
departed for their winter grounds. Other records
included 120 birds resting at the Loes river estuary on
1 1 November 2004, and c. 1 30 birds at O’Swamp on 1 6
November 2004. The last record was of one bird at
Tasitolu on 3 December 2004.
There are few Wallacean records of substantial
numbers: Hornbuckle (2001) saw 120 birds on Sumba
on 1 November 2001, and Verhoeye and Holmes
(1998) noted 85 birds on Flores on 3 December 1990.
The extensive grasslands of Sumba might also be used
for staging by Oriental Pratincole.
Australian Pratincole Stiltia Isabella
This species is a regular and widespread Australian
winter migrant, recorded in small numbers (1-20
birds) from 2 August to 21 November and on 2 May
2004 on fallow ricefields, braided stream channels and
fringing lakes. An estimated 1,500-2,500 birds were
present at Kupang Bay on 10-12 June 2004.
Thompson et al. (1976) reported c.30 at Secal on 19
May 1974, and Holmes (1993) indicated that they
were ‘very common’ in West Timor in July. Verbelen
(1996) noted at least 50 birds at Kupang Bay.
Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica
This species apparently occurs transiently in Timor-
Leste. The only records of this species were of 1-5 birds
at Tasitolu from 30 October to 26 November 2003, and
observations at several sites during 1 8 September to 1 1
October 2004. Andrew (1986) noted a maximum of 82
birds at Kupang Bay on 1 October 1985. McKean et al.
(1975) recorded two at Secal on 28 October 1973, and
Verbelen (1996) reported at least 20 from Kupang Bay.
Gull-billed Tern is an uncommon visitor during June to
November (particularly October-November), presum¬
ably from Australia.
Lesser Crested Tern Sterna bengalensis
This species was scarce but possibly overlooked, with
four records of 1-8 birds along Dili foreshore during
1-7 November 2003.
Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii
This tern was locally common around Dili but gener¬
ally scarce elsewhere (128 records from 14 sites).
Tasitolu was regularly used as a roost by 50-150 birds,
with a maximum of c.380 birds on 2 January 2004.
Little Tern Sterna albifrons
This species is an uncommon breeding visitor to
Timor-Leste. At Lake Laga, 25 birds including at least
six pairs were incubating eggs or feeding fish to chicks
on a small gravel islet on 2 August 2003; five adults and
one downy chick were present on 1 1 October 2004; six
adults and five chicks were seen on 23 October 2004;
and three juveniles were seen on 5 November 2004
(with no birds seen on 28 November or 2 December
2004). This species was also recorded (probably
breeding) at Loes river estuary on 25 September 2004.
Forty birds were present at Kupang Bay on 12 June
2004, with mating observed. McKean et al. (4 975)
reported four birds at Laivai and two at Secal on 25-28
October 1973. Johnstone (1994) noted breeding at
Merah island on 8 May 1991. In Wallacea, breeding
was given as May-September (Coates and Bishop
1997), but it breeds throughout the dry season on
Timor.
Common Tern Sterna hirundo
New island record. One bird was observed in flight and
perched on rocks near Atabae on 1 1 November 2004
and two were present at Dili on the foreshore on 13
November 2004 (both observations were video-
recorded). The birds at Dili perched on a rusting
shipwreck about 30 m from the beach. These birds
were large (35-40 cm long), eliminating smaller species
such as Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus, White¬
winged Tern C. leucopterus or Little Tern. The most
likely confusion species is the smaller Black-napedTern
Sterna sumatrana or Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii. The
bill was black, moderately long (almost the same as
head length, and longer than shown in Coates and
Bishop 1997) and appeared to be slightly decurved.
The bill shape excluded the possibility of Cull-billed
Tern, although the length suggested Roseate Tern. The
legs were black, probably excluding Roseate Tern. The
forehead was white, and there was a well-developed
black cap from behind and above the eye to the nape.
The neck and chest were clean white, the wings were
light grey with a well-defined blackish carpal-bar. The
light grey wings, dark carpal-bar and blackish outer
primaries are typical of non-breeding Common Tern,
and darker than in Black-napedTern or Roseate Tern.
Common Tern breeds in North America, Eurasia, and
Africa and winters in South America, South Africa,
South-East Asia and Australia (Coates and Bishop
1997). In the Lesser Sundas there are records from
70
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Sumbawa, Flores and Sumba, but it is apparently
uncommon (Coates and Bishop 1997).
White-winged Tern Chlidonias leucopterus
This tern is an uncommon migrant, with two seen at an
estuary 10 km east ofVermasse on 11 October 2004
and up to six at Tasitolu on 13-20 October 2004.
McKean et al. (1975) reported 500 birds at Baucau
beach on 22 October, ten at Jaco island on 25 October
and five at Secal on 28 October 1973, probably indicat¬
ing that passage through the Timor area occurs in
October.
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus
This species was seasonally locally common, with
records from five sites, extending through all months
except February-March. Larger groups included 82
birds at Lake Iralalara on 29 September 2004 and up
to 50 birds at Tasitolu through September 2004.
Andrew (1986) reported the Australian race javanicus
from Kupang Bay in September.
Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis
Little Grebe is a locally common breeding resident on
lakes and rivers in Timor-Leste. At Lake Eraulo, three
stripe-headed juveniles were present on 26 April 2003,
and at Lake Iralalara two juveniles were present on 25
April 2004. The species is an abundant non-breeding
resident at Tasitolu, with 40-50 birds usually recorded,
and up to 82 birds on 20 October 2004.
Australasian Grebe Tachybaptus novaehollandiae
A breeding adult with two chicks (with striped head,
red bill and dark iris) was recorded at Lake Iralalara on
24 and 28 May 2004. Little Grebe occurs sympatrically
at this site. Australasian Grebe is apparently rare on
Timor, and this is one of the first breeding records. An
immature male was collected 10 km west of Lautem on
14 April 1974 by Thompson et al. (1976). OtherTimor
records include an adult male collected at Supul on
March 30 (Thompson et al. 1976). On Timor, Coates
and Bishop (1997) note this species occurring only in
West Timor. This species was also recently recorded
from a large freshwater lake on Roti island (Trainor
2005).
Darter Anhinga melanogaster
NearThreatened. Darter is a locally common species in
Timor-Leste on freshwater lakes and rivers, estuaries
and outcrops along the coast. A large (probably
breeding) population is present on Lake Iralalara, with
regular counts of more than ten individuals, and
maximum counts of 19-20 birds (flying to a roost
along the Irasequiro river), but otherwise this species
was observed mostly as singles and small parties.
Females have pale necks and males have a broad white
stripe behind the eye and rusty foreneck-patch; these
characters identify the race occurring on Timor as
novaehollandiae. McKean et al. (1975) observed 30
birds at Lake Iralalara. At least three individuals were
seen at Kupang Bay by Verbelen (1996).
Little Pied Cormorant Phalacrocorax melanoleucos
This species was common, widespread and usually
recorded as singles and groups of up to five birds, but
a large resident population of 100-350 birds was
present at Lake Iralalara, probably one of the largest in
Wallacea (cf. Coates and Bishop 1997). In
August-September 2001, local communities collected
eggs and chicks from an estimated 500-1,000 nests at
Lake Iralalara during receding flood waters (C. da Silva
and A. Marcus verbally 2004). This species is also
abundant on Roti island (Trainor 2005).
Little Black Cormorant Phalacrocorax sulcirostris
This cormorant was locally common in small to large
flocks on saline or freshwater lakes, and along the
coast. Two large groups were recorded: c.350 atTibar
aquaculture ponds (these birds frequently flew to
Tasitolu to feed and roost) and 200-300 birds at Lake
Iralalara (where local people state that they breed).
White-faced Heron Egretta novaehollandiae
This species was locally common in ricefields east of
Baucau (at Secal, Vermasse and Laivai), but there were
only two records from Lautem district. Verbelen (1996)
noted at least 30 birds at Kupang Bay. It is probably a
breeding resident.
Little Egret Egretta garzetta
This egret was locally common on mudflats, exposed
reefs, freshwater lakes and streams, occuring mostly
singly or in small groups, but 30-60 birds were
recorded at Lake Iralalara and Manatuto mudflats.
Numbers rose steadily at Tasitolu from two birds on 12
April to 41 birds on 1 1 May 2003, presumably indicat¬
ing the arrival of visitors from Australia.
Pacific Reef Egret Egretta sacra
Pacific Reef Egret was common and widespread along
the coast, and was usually recorded as singles and small
loose groups of up to 15 birds. An exceptional group of
68 birds was present at Secal on 19 September 2004.
Pied Heron Egretta picata
This heron was generally an uncommon or rare visitor
to Timor-Leste (from Australia), and it was regularly
recorded only at Lake Iralalara, where 1-6 birds were
noted in the dry season from September to December
in 2003 and 2004 (but were absent during
January-April 2004). A single immature bird with a
white head and neck was present at Tasitolu on 1 8 May
2004. The first Timor records were of up to 18 birds at
Kupang bay on 31 August 1985 (Andrew 1986). On
Roti, Johnstone and Jepson (1996) noted two birds on
7 October.
Great-billed Heron Ardea sumatrana
Near Threatened. Great-billed Heron was an
uncommon resident of remote coastline in Timor-
Leste. There were six records: Lake Modo Mahut
(one), Namulutu estuary (four singles along several
kilometres of reef), Maca beach (three singles), and
Com (one). Additional records include one atTutuala,
one near Baucau beach and one along rocky coast
between Dili and Manatuto (McKean et al. 1975,
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
71
Thompson et al. 1976). Lesmana et al. (2000) reported
an observation of one bird at Bena Hunting Park, West
Timor.
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea
This large heron was a surprisingly rare resident of
beaches and exposed reefs, with records at Valu beach
(a single on the beach and three roosting in sea caves
1 km to the south), Vero river estuary (one), and Jaco
island (one). Coates and Bishop (1997) noted only one
Timor record of Purple Heron, but Verbelen (1996)
saw a single bird at Kupang Bay. Ten Kate collected
this bird on Roti in 1891 (Johnstone and Jepson 1996).
Great Egret Casmerodius albus
Great Egret was locally common at coastal and fresh¬
water wetlands. Large groups totalling at least 53 birds
were present at Lake Iralalara on 12 November 2003,
and 12 were present at Cristo Rei on 14 November
2003. This bird possibly breeds at Lake Iralalara. This
species was unrecorded by Thompson et al. (1976).
Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia
This egret was generally uncommon on freshwater
lakes and estuaries, except at Lake Iralalara where large
groups of 100-200 individuals were observed on
several occasions.
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis
This species was locally common, with records from
ricefields, freshwater lakes and estuaries, usually in
tight groups of 10-40 birds. There were at least 300
birds at Lake Iralalara in October 2004.
Little Heron Butorides striatus
This heron was a locally common resident, especially
on coastal mudflats and estuaries, with one inland
record at the Lake Iralalara (Irasequiro river).
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax
New island record. Thirty birds roosted in Hibiscus
tiliaceus and other riverine trees at Lake Iralalara
(Irasequiro river) on 9 March 2003 (none was present
20 March 2004, but eight birds were present on 2
October 2004), and c. 8 5- 100 birds were flushed from
Typha sp. reedbeds at O’Swamp on 1 1 March 2004
(and also on 27 November 2004). The black crown and
hindneck contrasting with the white neck and under¬
parts distinguished these birds from Rufous Night
Heron, which has a rufous back and cinnamon neck
and underparts. This species is either an occasional
visitor or possibly a local breeding resident. There is
one published Nusa Tenggara record (on Flores), one
record for Ashmore Reef off south-west Timor (Coates
and Bishop 1997), and it has recently been newly
recorded on Sumbawa and Lombok (Y. Rusila-Noor in
Trainor et al. in press, personal observations).
Rufous Night Heron Nycticorax caledonicus
This species was generally an uncommon and local
resident, with records from Typha sp. swamps,
mangroves and rivers. All observations were of singles,
except for ten found roosting with Black-crowned
Night Herons at Lake Iralalara, and three at Com
(Lake Airleo) which were repeatedly but unsuccessfully
attacked by a Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus.
Thompson et al. (1976) reported a single subadult at
Secal, and Stein collected one in West Timor (Mayr
1944).
Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis
This bittern was locally common at freshwater
marshes, lakes and swamps, but with only 1 1 records of
21 birds, this bird was probably often overlooked
because of its inconspicuous behaviour. It was usually
flushed as singles, including six birds at O’Swamp.
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus
This species was locally common, with 1 8 records from
four sites, all on the Fuiloro plateau, covering wet
grassland, sedge and Typha sp. swamp habitat. Noske
and Ueda (1996) reported the first Timor record of
Cinnamon Bittern from near Kupang.
Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis
This species was an occasional resident of rivers, fresh¬
water lakes and swamps, with records of singles and
pairs from eight sites; it was particularly frequent at
Lake Iralalara (Irasequiro river). It is probably a
breeding resident. A dark brown juvenile bird was
observed at Lake Be Malae on 17 December 2003, and
a streak-chested juvenile was observed at the Irasequiro
river on 1 5 October 2004 (R. F. A. Grimmett verbally
2004). The species was not recorded by Thompson et
al. (1976), but a single was collected in West Timor
(Mayr 1944).
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus
Glossy Ibis is an uncommon visitor to Timor, presum¬
ably from Australia. One was present at Tasitolu from
17 May to 7 June 2004, and four birds were observed
at Iralalara from 8 October to 30 November 2004.
Andrew (1986) reported 26 birds on 31 August and 21
on 2 October at Kupang Bay.
Royal Spoonbill Platalea regia
This species was a regular Australian visitor to Timor-
Leste (and Timor), with 23 records from seven sites
during September to February (but probably present
year-round). It was usually observed in small groups,
but 109 birds were present at the Loes estuary from 1 1
November 2004 to 5 December 2004. Two specimens
from Dili have been collected (on 17 April 1931: Mayr
1944). Verbelen (1996) saw at least 40 birds at Kupang
Bay.
Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus
This species was frequent on coastal lakes, mudflats
and inland freshwater lakes and marshes throughout
the year. It should be considered as a regular visitor to
Timor rather than an uncommon vagrant from
Australia (cf. Coates and Bishop 1997). Most flocks
were small (mean = 10.3 birds), but there were nine
observations of larger flocks (30-71 individuals). The
first Timor record was of two birds at Secal (McKean
et al. 1975).
72
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
DISCUSSION
Species status
The discovery of ten new waterbirds for Timor, and a
revision to our understanding of the status of many
species on Timor, highlights the former poverty of
knowledge of Timor’s waterbird fauna. Inconspicuous
species such as Greater Painted-snipe and Spotless
Crake (and possibly the nocturnal Black-crowned
Night Heron) almost certainly breed on Timor but
have been overlooked in the past. Their presence on the
island hints at the possibility that other skulking water-
birds, particularly rails, may be resident. It is telling
that there are no endemic rails known from Timor,
whereas several of the wetter Wallacean islands (e.g.
Sulawesi, Talaud and Halmahera) support endemic
forms (Coates and Bishop 1997, Lambert 1998a,b).
The status of a number of Australian waterbirds has
been clarified by the records presented here. Australian
Pelican is clearly a common year-round visitor to
Timor, and not a vagrant, or a visitor following
periodic ‘influxes’ as suggested by Coates and Bishop
(1997). Species such as Pied Heron and Glossy Ibis
possibly occur as regular winter visitors in low numbers
but more observations will be needed to confirm this.
Hardhead and Common Coot clearly occur as regular
long-term visitors. Observations of Hardhead at Lake
Iralalara suggest that it arrives in large numbers at the
end of the dry season to exploit favourable feeding
conditions. Red-capped Plover has been confirmed as a
breeding resident (Olsen and Trainor 2005), with
observations of juveniles and mating in the current
survey, even though the species was previously not even
recognised as occurring in Wallacea by some authors
(Marchant and Higgins 1993).
Timor-Leste has been confirmed as a regular
wintering area for many Palearctic passage migrants,
especially Whimbrel, Eastern Curlew, Pacific Golden
Plover, Grey Plover, Greater Sand Plover, Marsh
Sandpiper, Common Greenshank, Wood Sandpiper,
Common Sandpiper, Grey-tailed Tattler, Red-necked
Stint, Long- toed Stint and Swinhoe’s Snipe. Only three
of these species were observed in flocks of 100 birds or
more (Red-necked Stint, Grey Plover and Common
Greenshank). This appears to be typical in Wallacea,
with the exception of Kupang Bay and Gulf of Bone
where large flocks occur (Andrew 1986, Coates and
Bishop 1997). The high turnover of transients at several
wetlands (notably Tasitolu and Lake Laga) is another
important feature of Timor-Leste wetlands. While peak
numbers are small, significant numbers of birds use
many wetlands as stopover sites during southward or
northward migration.
The discovery of Oriental Pratincole and Oriental
Plover staging in Timor-Leste is one of the most inter¬
esting findings of this study. Both species winter in
Australia and have been irregularly reported in
Wallacea (presumably because of the sporadic nature
of past field-effort). Lake Iralalara is particularly
important for these species with up to c. 3,000 Oriental
Pratincole recorded November 2004. The low number
of Little Curlew records was striking, but possibly in
some years short-grass habitat in Timor-Leste is used
by this species as well.
Timor island is important for several species that
typically do not continue migrating further south to
winter in Australia. These include Common Redshank,
Long-toed Stint and Little Ringed Plover. The latter
species occurs regularly in small numbers in Timor-
Leste and through Nusa Tenggara, with recent records
from Roti, Sumba and Lombok (Trainor submitted, N.
Kemp, verbally 2004). On current information, Timor
probably provides an important stopover for small
numbers of uncommon migrants such as Ruddy
Turnstone, Red Knot, Great Knot, Sanderling and
Ruff (and probably Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus
semipalmatus and Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata :
Andrew 1986).
The Near Threatened Beach Thick-knee and
Malaysian Plover, which both have restricted beach
and coastal distributions, were recorded relatively
frequently; Timor-Leste hosts important populations of
Table 3. The top 15 Timor-Leste wetlands ordered by the total number of waterbird species recorded.
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
73
these species. Malaysian Plover was repeatedly
observed on beaches used intensiveely by people (at
Tua Koin, Com and Comoro river estuary), apparently
indicating that the species can cope with high levels of
disturbance. Of the resident waterbirds, some of the
largest Wallacean flocks were observed for Little Pied
Cormorant, Little Black Cormorant, Pacific Black
Duck, and Sunda Teal.
Seven waterbirds and coastal seabirds listed for
Timor went unrecorded in the current survey: White-
headed Shelduck Tadorna radjah, Kentish Plover
Charadrius alexandrinusy Eurasian Curlew, Asian
Dowitcher, Ruff, Caspian Tern Sterna caspia and
Australian Ibis Threskiornis molucca. The plover, curlew
and Ruff are winter visitors from the Palearctic and are
known only from Kupang Bay in WestTimor, highlight¬
ing the importance of that area to passage migrants
(Andrew 1986). The first Timor record of Ruff was of
two birds photographed at Kupang Bay by Verbelen
(1996). The Kupang Bay wetlands, with c. 2, 000-4, 000
ha of mudflats and fishponds, has no equivalent in
Timor-Leste, but these migrants might occur as rare
visitors to Timor-Leste. The only Timor record of
Australian White Ibis was also at Kupang Bay on 7
August 1998 (R. Drijvers inTrainor et al. in press). Up
to five Asian Dowitchers were recorded from mudflats
at Hera in October 2003 (J. Keast verbally 2005). A
large flock of White-headed Shelduck was recorded in
Timor-Leste on a pond at 1,280 m in April 1882
(Forbes 1885). The status of the Caspian Tern is poorly
known, with the only records coming from Baucau and
around Dili in October, January and May (McKean et
al. 1975). Australian White Ibis is probably a rare
visitor from Australia, like White-headed Shelduck.
Key sites
While there were substantial differences in survey
effort between sites, a number of nationally and region¬
ally important wetlands have been identified in this
study (Table 3). Lake Iralalara, including the Irasequiro
river, is the most important freshwater wetland in
Timor-Leste, and probably the entire Nusa Tenggara
region. It will be included in the nation’s first national
park along with the adjacent closed-canopy forests
around Tutuala, Maupiting and Mehara villages. The
lake usually covers 5-8 km2, but during irregular
flooding (e.g. in 1954, 1966, 1970, 1974-1975, 1997,
1999-2001: I. Mendes verbally 2004) it reaches about
100 km2. A diverse range of wetland habitats in the area
support large populations of egrets, cormorants and
Pacific Black Duck (which occurs in large congrega¬
tions at the end of the dry season each year). Local
people state that flooding triggers colonial nesting by
many waterbirds, especially cormorants, but this has
never been formally documented. Five of the ten
species newly reported for Timor island were recorded
at Lake Iralalara: Hardhead, Green Pygmy-goose,
Ruddy-breasted Crake, Greater Painted-snipe and
Black-crowned Night Heron, and a further species, the
Spotless Crake, was recorded at associated wetlands.
Several Palearctic winter migrants including Sharp¬
tailed Sandpiper, Long-toed Stint and Swinhoe’s Snipe
overwinter at the lake, with populations numbering in
the tens or low hundreds of birds.
The saline lakes of Tasitolu were repeatedly
censused and consequently had the highest total
number of waterbird species, including 27 Palearctic
migrants, resident populations of Little Grebe and
Red-capped Plovers and occasional occurrences of rare
waterbirds (Hardhead, Red Knot, Spotted Redshank
and Little Ringed Plover). Tasitolu was identified as an
Important Bird Area, with surrounding savannas
hosting Timor Sparrow Lonchura fuscata (Vulnerable)
and Slaty Cuckoo Dove Turacoena niodesta
(Vulnerable), and it will be gazetted as a Peace Park
(BirdLife International 2003, Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries et al. 2003). The Tasitolu lakes
are ecologically linked to numerous surrounding small
wetlands: the Tibar mudflats and aquaculture ponds
3 km to the west, Comoro river estuary, Dili and Cristo
Rei foreshore. The extensive mudflats at Hera and
Metinaro (15-30 1cm east of Dili) support relatively
high numbers of cormorants, Darter and winter
migrants.
Lake Laga is a second shallow saline lake that
deserves special mention. It appears to be important
for numerous flocks of transient waders, and provides
habitat for Oriental Plover and breeding Little Tern.
Suggestions for further study
The status of a number of waterbirds remains poorly
known on Timor, with targeted surveys needed for
elusive rails, snipe and perhaps night herons. Wetlands
on the Fuiloro plateau and the Lake Modo Mahut
region, both of which include a wide range of springs,
swamps, marshes, and reedbeds, should be targeted
initially. The status of several winter migrants remains
poorly known and further surveys of saline lakes,
mudflats and large river estuaries (e.g. Loes and Secal,
but others might be identified) are a priority. The
accessibility from Dili of a range of wetlands along the
north coast (e.g. Lake Maubara, Tibar aquaculture,
Tasitolu, Metinaro and Manatuto mudflats) would
make these candidates for regular monitoring of water-
bird populations (and perhaps research and
environmental education programmes). Further study
of migrants at the regionally important Kupang Bay is
also needed. At this site winter counts of Australian
Pratincole (at least) qualify this site as an internation¬
ally significant wetland (following Delaney and Scott
2002).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for the fieldwork came from BirdLife International which
has received support for work inTimor-Leste from Vogelbescherming
Nederland (BirdLife Partner in the Netherlands) and the Keidanren
Nature Conservation Fund. Richard Grimmett identified the need
for field surveys in Timor-Leste and gathered the resources for them
to be carried out. The U.K. Parrot Society, and the Tropical Savannas
Management Cooperative Research Centre also contributed funds to
support the fieldwork. Rudyanto of BirdLife Asia prepared the map.
Iwein Mauro kindly allowed me to use his waterbird observations
from Lake Modo Mahut. The following staff of the Timor-Leste
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and Ministry of
Environment and Development provided important help in the field
or facilitated government support: Mr Amaro, Cypriana Soares,
Odete Gutteres, Leonisa Lobato, Fernando Santana, Lorenzo dos
Santos, John dos Santos, Estanislau da Silva, Manuel Da Silva, Jose
Fernandes Teixeira, Flaminio Xavier and Almeida Fernandes Xavier.
74
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Thanks to Niven McCrie for examining video-recordings and identi¬
fying the Pectoral Sandpiper.
The field survey received important support from the following
individuals: Francisco Alves, Alcino de Araujo, Amando Soares,
Francisco Soares and Thomas Soares (Atauro island); Erbenio dos
Santos, Salvador dos Santos, Octavio da Silva, Alcantra Fernandes
Xavier, Arlindo Fernandes Xavier, Duarte Xavier, Evaristo
Fernandes Xavier (Com); Venuncio da Costa (Ili Lapa); Mateus
Fernandes, Ricardo Gomes, Evaristo Laranzina, Acasio Martins,
Amelio Valenti and Tome Valenti (Lore); Armando da Costa,
Dommingus da Costa, Dan Groshong, Jose Marquos, Julio Sampaio,
Alberto dos Santos (Luro); Patricio Da Conceicao, Alarico
Cristovao, Reynaldo Freiras, Luis Immegeno and Macario Miranda
(Bauro); Julio Branca, Gilberto da Cabral, Custodio Castillo,
Americo da Corta, Virisimo Dias; David Freitas, Ravele Fretes,
Hergulando Garcia, Lamberto Lopes, Mario Lopes, Albino Marcus,
Norberto Mendes, Sabino Mendes, Ernesto Pereira, Americo Da
Silva, Carminio da Silva, Sebastian, Nicole Siebel, Marvaun Soares,
Jose Fernandes Teixeira (Muapiting and Malahara); Marcario de
Jesus and Americo Da Silva (Tutuala); Juviano Barros, Jose Castilho,
Julio da Costa, Albino Lopes, Manuel Olivera, Macario de Jesus and
Olavio de Jesus (Valu beach). Finally, thanks to an anonymous
reviewer for improving the text of this paper.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P (1986) Notes on some birds ofTimor. Kukila 2: 92-95.
Asia-Pacific Migratory Waterbird Conservation Committee. (2001)
Asia-Pacific migratory waterbird conservation strategy: 2001-2005.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Wetlands International- Asia Pacific.
Barrett, G., Silcocks, A, Barry, S, Cunningham, R. and Poulter, R.
(2003) The new atlas of Australian birds. Hawthorne East,
Australia: Royal Australian Ornithological Union.
BirdLife International (2003) A preliminary list of Important Bird
Areas in East Timor. Darwin, Australia: BirdLife International
Asia Division/Vogelbescherming.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Carter, M. and Sudbury, A. (1993) Spotted Redshank Tringa erythro-
pus in Australia. Australian BirdWatcher 15: 149-159.
Chatto, R. (2003) The distribution and status of shorebirds around the
coast and coastal wetlands of the Northern Territory. Palmerston,
Australia: Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern
Territory Technical Report no. 73.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds ofWallacea.
Alderley, Queensland: Dove Publications.
Delaney, S. and Scott, D. (Eds.) (2002) Waterbird population estimates.
Third Edition. Wetlands International Global Series No. 12,
Wageningen, Netherlands: Wetlands International.
Forbes, H. O (1885) A naturalist’s wanderings in the eastern archipel¬
ago. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Grantham, M. (2000a) Australian Pelican on East Timor: an
armchair record. Kukila 11: 144
Grantham, M. (2000b) Record of Hardhead (White-eyed Duck)
from Lombok. Kukila 1 1: 144.
Hartert, E. (1901) On the birds of Key and South-east Islands, and
of Ceram laut. Novit Zool. 8: 93-101.
Hayman, R, Marchant, J. and Prater, T. (1986) Shorebirds: an identi¬
fication gidde to the shorebirds of the world. London: Croom Helm.
Holmes, D. A. (1993) Birds on Timor: synopsis of birds recorded on
Timor, 1993. Unpublished report.
Hornbuckle, J. (2001) Wallacea, Indonesia: birding trip report 5
October - 17 November 2001. Downloaded from http://www.
geocities. com/jonhornbuckle2004.
Hornskov, J. (1995) Recent observations of birds in the Philippine
Archipelago. Forktail 11: 1-10.
Johnstone, R. E. (1994) Observations of seabirds and shorebirds in
Nusa Tenggara (Lesser Sundas) and Moluccas, Indonesia. W.
Austr. Naturalist 19: 339-350.
Johnstone, R. E. and Jepson, P. (1996) The birds of Roti island, Nusa
Tenggara, Indonesia. W. Austr. Naturalist 21: 23-35.
Lambert, F. R. (1998a) A new species of Gymnocrex from theTalaud
Islands, Indonesia. Forktail 13: 1-6.
Lambert, F. R. (1998b) A new species of Amaurornis from' theTalaud
Islands, Indonesia, and a review of bush hens occurring from the
Philippines to Australasia. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 118: 67—82.
Lane, B. A. and Rogers, D. I. (2000) The Australian Painted Snipe
Rostratula ( benghalensis ) australis: an endangered species. The Stilt
36: 26-34.
Lesmana, D., Trainor, C. and Gatur, A. (2000) Arti penting hutan di
daratan Timor bagian barat: telaah awal informasi keanekaragaman
hayati dan sosial ekonomi di Pulau Timor ( Propinsi Nusa Tenggara
Timur). [‘ The importance of forest areas in West Timor: a review
of biodiversity and socio-economic information based on rapid
surveys’] Bogor: PKA/BirdLife International WW F, Report No
13. (In Indonesian.)
Marchant, S. and Higgins, P. J., eds. (1993) Handbook of Australian,
New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 2. Melbourne: Oxford
University Press.
Mauro, I. (1999) Preliminary report on birds recorded from
Wallacea: Sulawesi, Moluccas and Lesser Sundas. Unpublished
report.
Mayr, E. (1944) The birds ofTimor and Sumba. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat.
Hist. 83: 126-194.
McCrie, N. (1995) First record of the Kentish Plover Charadrius
alexandrinus in Australia. Australian BirdWatcher 16: 91-95.
McKean, J. L., Mason, I J. and O’Connor, L. W. (1975) Birds not
previously recorded from Timor. Emu 75: 62-64.
Mees, G. F. (1976) Some birds recorded from Timor by Salomon
Muller 1828-1829. Emu 76: 150-151.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, NSW National Parks
& Wildlife Service and BirdLife International (2003) Proposal to
establish a protected area network in Timor-Leste. Dili: Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
Noske, R. A. and Saleh, N. (1996) The conservation status of forest
birds in West Timor. Pp. 65-74 in D. Kitchener and A. Suyanto,
eds. Proceedings of the first international conference on Eastern
Indonesian: Australian Vertebrate Fauna. Manado, Indonesia.
Jakarta: Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) and Western
Australian Museum.
Noske, R. and Ueda, K. (1996) First record of Cinnamon Bittern for
Timor. Kukila 8: 158-159.
Olsen, J. and Trainor, C. R. (2005) A first breeding record of the
Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus for Wallacea and notes
on other Waders observed at Tasi-tolu, Timor-Leste. Austr. Field
Orn 22: 1-4.
Riley, J. (1997) The birds of Sangihe and Talaud, North Sulawesi.
Kukila 9: 3-36
Thompson, H., McKean, J. L. and Mason, I. (1976) Observations of
birds inTimor, 1974-1975. Unpublished report.
Trainor, C. R. (2005) Birds ofTupuafu peninsula, Roti Island, Lesser
Sundas, Indonesia. Forktail 21: 121-131.
Trainor, C. R. and Soares, T. (2004) Birds of Atauro Island, Timor-
Leste (East Timor) Forktail. 20: 41-48.
Trainor, C. R., Benstead, P., Martin, K., Lesmana, D., Agista, D.,
Benstead, M. C., Drijvers, R. and Setiawan, I. (in press) New
bird records for Nusa Tenggara Islands: Sumbawa, Moyo,
Sumba, Flores, Pulau Besar and Timor. Kukila 13.
Undeland, P. and Sangha, H. S. (2002) Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris
melanotis: a new species for the Indian subcontinent. Forktail 18:
157.
UNTAET (2000) Regulation No. 2000/19 on protected places. Dili:
UNTAET.
Verbelen, F. (1996) Birding in Sumba and Timor: Lesser Sundas,
Indonesia. Privately published report.
Verheijen, J. A. J. (1964) Breeding season on the island of Flores.
Ardea 52: 194-201.
White, C. M. N. (1975) Migration of Palaearctic waders in Wallacea.
Emu 75: 35-39.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The Birds ofWallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands Indonesia) : an
annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list No 7).
Colin R. Trainor, BirdLife International, and Tropical Savannas Management Cooperative Research Centre, Charles
Darwin University 0909, Northern Territory, Australia. Email: colin.trainor@cdu.edu.au
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
75
76
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
Species status
Br= Breeding resident
Non-breeding visitor: Av= Australian visitor, Pv= Palearctic winter visitor, Iv= Indian Ocean
Passage migrant: Am= Australian summer passage migrant, Pm= Palearctic winter passage migrant
Va= Vagrant
Abundance
A= Abundant
C= Common
LC= Locally common
F= Frequent
U= Uncommon
R= Rare
Forktail 21 (2005)
Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-Leste (East Timor)
77
APPENDIX 2
Timor-Leste wetland sites (site numbers correspond to those in Fig. 1)
78
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 79-86
Species diversity, relative abundance and habitat
use of the birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife
Sanctuary, Bangladesh
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Avifaunal surveys were carried out in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh, from September 2001 to February 2003.
A total of 198 species was recorded including Buffy Fish Owl Ketupa ketupu (second record for Bangladesh), Streak-breasted
Woodpecker Picus viridanus (first record in the Indian Subcontinent since 1958) and nine species not previously recorded in the
Sundarbans of Bangladesh.
INTRODUCTION
The Sundarbans is the largest single tract of tidal
mangrove forest in the world, covering c. 10,000 km2
in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta of Bangladesh and
India. Roughly 60% lies in the south-west of
Bangladesh and the rest is in the south-east of the
Indian state of West Bengal. There have been a
number of previous studies of the birds of the
Bangladesh Sundarbans. Rashid et al. (1994) listed
315 species but this included species of hypothetical
occurrence. Husain et al. (1983) recorded 83 species
in the Bangladesh Sundarbans Nilkamal Sanctuary
(Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary) in May 1982,
and Islam et al. (1999) recorded 181 species in the
Bangladesh Sundarbans during winter months
(October-March) from 1995 to 1997. Rashid and
Scott (1990) reported observations of waders, and
some bird records in mangroves were provided by
Khan (1986). Rashid (1967), Husain (1967, 1979),
Khan (1982), Sarker and Sarker (1988), Harvey
(1990), and Thompson and Johnson (1996) produced
lists of birds in Bangladesh and indicated species that
are found in the Sundarbans. Subsequent reports on
notable birds (Thompson et al. 1993, Thompson and
Johnson 2003) have updated the knowledge of the
status and distribution of many species in
Bangladesh.
N
k
0 30 km
L_ _ — 1— — I
international boundary
Sundarbans
Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary
INDIA
(West Bengal)
Sundarbans East
Wildlife Sanctuary
BAY OF BENGAL
Figure 1. Map showing location of Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh.
80
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
STUDY AREA
The Sundarbans is located at 21°30'-22°30'N
88°05'-89°55'E (Fig. l).The monthly mean tempera¬
ture and relative humidity normally varies from 23°C
and 70% during December-January to 35"C and 80%
during May-June. There are three wildlife sanctuaries
in the Bangladesh Sundarbans: Sundarbans East,
Sundarbans South and Sundarbans West; together they
form a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The
Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary covers an area of
312 knr at the south-eastern end of the Sundarbans.
There are five major habitat types: (1) mangroves,
dominated by Heritiera fames, Excoecaria agallocha , and
Sonneratia apetala, covering c.35% of the sanctuary; (2)
grasslands, typically with Imperata cylindrica ,
Acrostichum aureum , Myriostachya wightiana, covering
c.5% of the sanctuary; (3) mudflats, including sandy
tidal flats and beaches, covering c.3% of the sanctuary;
(4) transitional zones between these three habitats,
usually with few trees, sometimes with reeds, covering
c.7% of the sanctuary; and (5) deep water, including
rivers and estuaries, covering c.50% of the sanctuary.
METHODS
Birds were surveyed for about one week every month
from September 2001 to February 2003. The research
team was based on a houseboat, which was based
mainly in Katka, Kochikhali and Supati. The survey
was conducted on foot and from a dinghy.
Observations were made with 7-21x40 binoculars,
mainly in the morning and evening. Grimmett et al.
(1998) and Ali and Ripley (1987) were used for identi¬
fication, and in many cases photographs were taken in
order to confirm the identification. Relative abundance
was assessed as ‘very common’ (seen on 75-100% of
visits), ‘common’ (seen on 50-74% of visits),
‘uncommon’ (seen on 25-49% of visits), or ‘rare’ (seen
on <25% of visits). For wintering migrants, abundance
was assessed only during the months they were
present. Global threat status follows BirdLife
International (2001); national threat status follows
IUCN Bangladesh (2000).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 198 species of birds was recorded (see
Appendix), of which 134 (68%) were resident (includ¬
ing 15 local migrants) and 64 (32%) were migrants.
Rashid et al. (1994) found a similar proportion (27%)
of migrant species among the 315 species in the entire
Bangladesh Sundarbans. Compared to mangroves
elsewhere, avian species diversity is very high in the
Sundarbans. Approximately equal proportions of
species fell into each of the four abundance categories:
very common (26%), common (21%), uncommon
(24%) and rare (29%). A total of 87 species (44%)
primarily used mangroves (and an additional 60
species used this habitat secondarily), 29 (15%) used
grasslands, 52 (26%) used mudflats and 30 (15%)
used transitional zones.
A total of nine species were recorded for the first
time in the Bangladesh Sundarbans: Blue-breasted
Quail Coturnix chinensis, Spot-billed Duck Anas
poecilorhyncha, Dollarbird Eurystomus orientalis, Indian
Pitta Pitta brachyura , Black-naped Oriole Oriolus
chinensis, Lesser Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus remifer.
Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma, Yellow-eyed Babbler
Chrysomma sinense and Ruby-cheeked Sunbird
Anthreptes singalensis. All were previously known from
elsewhere in Bangladesh.
Sixteen species had only been previously recorded
by Rashid et al. (1994): Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo,
Pompadour Green Pigeon Treron pompadora. Yellow¬
footed Green Pigeon Treron phoenicoptera, Ruddy¬
breasted Crake Porzana fusca, Marsh Sandpiper Tringa
stagnatilis. Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus,
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta. Greater Spotted
Eagle Aquila clanga, Malayan Night Heron Gorsachius
melanolophus, Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamo-
meus. Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus,
Ashy Woodswallow Artamus fuscus, Orange-headed
Thrush Zoothera citrina. Bank Myna Acridotheres
ginginianus, Pale-billed Flowerpecker Dicaeum erythro-
rynchos and Scaly-breasted Munia Lonchura punctulata.
Nearly all the previous avifaunal lists for the area
include some species of hypothetical occurrence, and
most refer to the entire Bangladesh Sundarbans.
However, at least 19 species have previously been
recorded in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary
that I did not observe: Lesser Yellownape Picus chlorolo-
phus. Oriental Scops Owl Otus sunia, Collared Scops
Owl Otus bakkamoena, Little Stint Calidris minuta,
Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis, Curlew Sandpiper
Calidris ferruginea, Oriental Pratincole Glareola
maldivarum. Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola. River
Tern Sterna aurantia, Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficol¬
lis, Darter Anhinga melanogaster, Purple Heron Ardea
purpurea, Dusky Warbler Phylloscopus fuscatus, Yellow-
browed Warbler Phylloscopus inornatus, Blyth’s Leaf
Warbler Phylloscopus reguloides. Jungle Babbler
Turdoides striatus, Oriental Skylark Alauda gulgula,
Orange -bellied Flowerpecker Dicaeum trigonostigma
and Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker Dicaeum cruentatum.
In some cases these omissions are likely to be due to
identification difficulties.
Four globally threatened species recorded: Masked
Finfoot Heliopais personata (Vulnerable), White-
rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis (Critically
Endangered), Greater Spotted Eagle (Vulnerable) and
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus (Vulnerable), plus
three Near Threatened species: Brown-winged
Kingfisher Halcyon amauroptera, Black-headed Ibis
Threskiornis melanocephalus and Mangrove Pitta Pitta
megarhyncha. Additionally, seven nationally threatened
species were recorded: Dollarbird (critically endan¬
gered), Ruddy Kingfisher Halcyon coromanda
(vulnerable). Brown Fish Owl Ketupa zeylonensis
(vulnerable), Masked Finfoot (endangered), White-
bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster (endangered),
Malayan Night Heron (critically endangered) and
Lesser Adjutant (endangered).
Thankfully, the Sundarbans East Wildlife
Sanctuary and its birds are not under severe pressure
yet, but over-exploitation of the natural resources,
poaching, increasing water salinity and pollution are
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
81
some of the growing threats. Moreover, the area is
susceptible to cyclones and rising sea level.
Masked Finfoot Heliopais personata
This species was seen uncommonly throughout the
year, with sightings in October, November and
December 2001; February, April, August, October and
December 2002. Most records were of singles, with
females seen more often than males, but a pair with
two juveniles was seen in October 2001 and another
pair was seen in April 2002, both in creeks in Katka.
Birds were usually seen foraging along the bank of the
creeks, feeding on small crabs during low tide, and
resting under bushes on the bank of creeks.
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis
One group of seven individuals was seen soaring over
the Kochikhali area on 22 September 2002. Local
fishermen reported that vultures rarely come down to
the mudflats of the sanctuary.
Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga
Singles were seen on 1 1 January and 14 December
2002, on the banks of the river Baleshawr at the
eastern end of the Sundarbans. It is occasionally seen
on the mudflats of big rivers and estuaries (e.g.
Meghna, Jamuna and Padma) elsewhere in Bangladesh
(Khan 1982, Harvey 1990, Thompson and Johnson
1996).
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
This species was seen quite commonly throughout the
year, usually single or in groups of up to five individu¬
als (mean flock size was 1.6 birds). They were normally
seen foraging along the muddy banks of the creeks, in
wet grasslands, resting in trees or flying. Juveniles were
seen three times, all in October 2002. On three
occasions I found parts of feathers or legs of this
species in the scats of tiger Panthera tigris. The remains
of killed adjutants were also found five times,
surrounded by tiger pugmarks, clearly indicating that
they had been hunted and eaten by tigers.
Brown-winged Kingfisher Halcyon amauroptera
This species is locally very common in the Sundarbans
and it was seen in all months during the study period.
In Bangladesh it is found mainly in the Sundarbans
and surrounding areas (Khan 1982, Harvey 1990,
Thompson and Johnson 1996).
Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus
One pair was seen on 14 September 2002 in Supati.
Although the species is rare in the Sundarbans, it is
quite common in the Meghna estuary, about 100 km
to the east (personal observations).
Mangrove Pitta Pitta megarhyncha
This species was seen rarely, with records in September
and November 2001, January, February, April, June
and August 2002, and January 2003, indicating that it
is resident. One was seen carrying an invertebrate in its
bill on 8 September 2001 in Kochikhali, indicating that
it probably had a nest nearby. A juvenile was seen on 3
February 2002 in the same area. In the Indian subcon¬
tinent it is found only in the Sundarbans (Grimmett et
al. 1998).
Streak-breasted Woodpecker Picus viridanus
This species was seen rarely, with records throughout
the year in September, October and November 2001,
and April, June, September, October and December
2002 (Plate 1). Most were singles, but an adult and a
juvenile were seen foraging together on 6 June 2002,
and a pair seen foraging together on 18 September
2002. Birds were identified by their grey cheeks (often
with streaking), distinct black moustachial patch on an
unstreaked pale brown throat, red iris, dusky bill with
yellow lower mandible and dark tip and black tail with
few white bars. The combination of these characters
distinguishes the species from Streak-throated
Woodpecker Picus xanthopygaeus and Laced
Woodpecker Picus vittatus. The only previous
confirmed record of Streak-breasted Woodpecker in
the Indian subcontinent was one specimen collected
from Burigoalini, about 50 km south-west of Khulna
(in the north-west of the Bangladesh Sundarbans) on
12 April 1958, but it was misidentified as Laced
Woodpecker (Paynter 1970, Short 1973, Harvey 1990,
Grimmett et al. 1998). Rasmussen (2000) compared
this specimen with the specimens of Streak-breasted
Woodpecker collected from adjacent Myanmar and re-
identified it as Streak-breasted Woodpecker. She noted
that unlike typical South-East Asian birds, individuals
from the north-western populations have a plain throat
and breast.
Buffy Fish Owl Ketupa ketupu
This species was recorded uncommonly throughout
the year, with records of singles or pairs in January,
September and October 2002 and January 2003
(Plate 2). Birds were mainly seen in trees on the banks
of narrow creeks. They were identified by their rich
brown upperparts, bare tarsi, relatively short tail with
few whitish bands and the lack of fine horizontal cross¬
barring on the underparts. The combination of these
characters distinguished birds from the similar Brown
Fish Owl Ketupa zeylojiensis, Tawny Fish Owl K.flavipes
and Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo (Grimmett et al.
1998, Konig et al. 1999, and Neumann-Denzau and
Denzau 2003). In the Indian subcontinent, there had
been no record of this species since the early 20th
century (Baker 1922-1930, Stevens 1915), until a
record in Katka, Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary
in November 2000 (Neumann-Denzau and Denzau
2003). Grimmett et al. (1998) commented that it was
recorded in east Assam (India) in early 20th century;
and was presumably once resident, but its current
status is unknown with no recent published records.
Konig et al. (1999) give the present western limit of this
species as southern Myanmar. The discovery that the
species is resident in the Sundarbans has pushed the
limit of its known current distribution 300 km to the
west. Both Buffy Fish Owl and Streak-breasted
Woodpecker are essentially South-East Asian species.
Their presence indicates that some birds with South-
East Asian affinity are found in the Sundarbans, as also
pointed out by Paynter (1970) and Neumann-Denzau
and Denzau (2003).
82
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Forktail21 (2005)
Plate 1. Streak-breasted Woodpecker Picus viridanus,
Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, June 2002.
Great Thick-knee Esacus recurvirostris
This species was recorded throughout the year on
sandy beaches in the south-east of the sanctuary at
Katka-Kochikhali, Egg Island and Pokkhir Char.
Singles (rarely), pairs or small flocks of up to eight
were seen. Pairs were recorded in October and
December 2002, January and February 2003. Two
nests were found on Katka beach in February and
March 2002. Both nests were simple depressions in the
dry sand, with a few dry twigs, on the upper part of the
beach; each had two pale buffy eggs with dark brown
patches. Injury feigning (by sitting on the knees and
hopping) was displayed by one bird in December
2002. In Bangladesh, the species is found mainly in the
Sundarbans (with one record in the river Jamuna:
P. Thompson in litt. 2004), where it was previously
known only in winter (Harvey 1990, Grimmett et al.
1998).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I sincerely acknowledge the WWF Prince Bernhard Scholarship for
Nature Conservation and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust for
providing financial support to my fieldwork, although the grant was
mainly for a project on the tiger. I thank the Forest Department of
Bangladesh for providing overall support during the fieldwork, and
Dr David J. Chivers for his cooperation during my study in
Cambridge. I am especially grateful to Dr Nigel Collar and Paul
Thompson for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and
Sri Lanka. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Baker, E. C. S. (1922-1930) The fauna of British India: birds. London:
Taylor and Francis.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, W. G. (1990) Birds in Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press.
Husain, K. Z. (1967) Systematic account of the birds of East
Pakistan. Dacca Univ. Studies 15(b): 43-51.
Plate 2. Buffy Fish Owl Ketupa ketupa, Sundarbans East
Wildlife Sanctuary, October 2002.
Husain, K. Z. (1979) Birds of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Government of
Bangladesh.
Husain, K. Z., Sarker, S. U. and Rahman, M. (1983) Summer birds
of the Sundarbans’ ‘Nilkamal Sanctuary’. Bangladesh J. Zool. 11:
48-51.
Islam, M. A., Khan, M. M. H., Kabir, M. M., Solhoy,T., Joarder, N.
B. and Feeroz, M. M. (1999) Winter birds of the Sundarbans,
Bangladesh. Ecoprint 6(1): 41-49.
IUCN Bangladesh (2000) Red book of threatened birds of Bangladesh.
Dhaka: IUCN - The World Conservation Union.
Khan, M. A. R. (1982) Wildlife of Bangladesh: a checklist. Dhaka:
University of Dhaka.
Khan, M. A. R. (1986) Wildlife in Bangladesh mangrove ecosystem.
J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 83: 32-47.
Konig, K., Weick, F. and Becking, J. H. (1999) Owls: a guide to the
owls of the world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Neumann-Denzau, G. and Denzau, H. (2003) Buffy fish-owl
{Ketupa ketupa) in Sundarbans, Bangladesh. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 100(1): 138-141.
Paynter, R. A., Jr (1970) Species with Malaysian affinities in the
Sundarbans, East Pakistan. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 90(5): 1 18-1 19.
Rashid, H. (1967) Systematic list of the birds of East Pakistan. Dacca:
The Asiatic Society of Pakistan. Publ. No. 20.
Rashid, S. M. A. and Scott, D. A. (1990) Some waders of the
Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh. Stilt 12: 51-52.
Rashid, S. M. A., Khan, A. and Akonda, A. W. (1994) Fauna. Pp.
115-131, 242-252 in Z. Hussain and G. Acharya, eds.
Mangroves of the Sundarbans, volume two: Bangladesh. Bangkok:
IUCN -The World Conservation Union.
Rasmussen, P. C. (2000) Streak-breasted Woodpecker Picus viridanus
in Bangladesh: re-identification of the region’s sole specimen
recorded as Laced Woodpecker P. vittatus. Forktail 16: 183-184.
Sarker, S. U. and Sarker, N. J. (1988) Wildlife of Bangladesh. Dhaka:
Rico Printers.
Short, L. L. (1973) Habits of some Asian woodpeckers (Aves,
Picidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 152(5).
Stevens, H. (1915) Notes on the birds of upper Assam. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 23: 234-268, 547-570, 721-736.
Thompson, P. M., Harvey, W. G., Johnson, D. L., Millin, D. J.,
Rashid, S. M. A., Scott, D. A., Stanford, C. and Woolner, J. D.
(1993) Recent notable bird records from Bangladesh. Forktail 9:
13-44.
Thompson, P. M. and Johnson, D. L. (1996) Birding in Bangladesh:
a guide to birdwatching sites and a checklist of birds. Dhaka:
unpublished report.
Thompson, P. M. and Johnson, D. L. (2003) Further notable bird
records from Bangladesh. Forktail 19: 85-102.
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
83
M. Monirul H. Khan, Wildlife Research Group, Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street,
Cambridge CB2 3DY, U.K. Present address: Department of Zoology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342,
Bangladesh. Email: mmhkhan@hotmail.com
APPENDIX
List of birds seen in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
84
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005)
The birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
85
86
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
Relative abundance: VC = very common; C = common; UC = uncommon; R = rare. Status: R = resident; RM = resident but local movements observed;
M = migrant. Habitat: W = mangrove woodlands including creeks; G = grasslands; M = mudflats including beaches; T = transitional habitats.
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 87-91
Population status and breeding ecology of
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis
in Rampur Valley, Nepal
NABIN BARAL, RAMJI GAUTAM and BIJAY TAMANG
We conducted a survey of the Critically Endangered White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis in lowland Nepal from October 2002 to
May 2003. Direct observations were made at roosting and nesting sites to assess the population size, breeding success and nest-tree
availability. A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess carcass disposal methods, threats from persecution and conservation
attitudes. Six vulture colonies were found, which supported 72-102 birds during the breeding season, and 123 birds following the
breeding season. Breeding success at 70 occupied nests was 0.5 young per nest. Most nests were in kapok Bombax ceiba trees, and
nesting habitat may be a limiting factor because these trees are logged for commercial purposes. A total of 33 dead vultures was found,
of which 30 were adults. The carcasses of domestic livestock appear to be the main source of food for vultures because there are few
alternative wildlife prey species in the surrounding habitats. The abundance of carcasses observed suggests there is no shortage of food.
Local people have favourable conservation attitudes, and their carcass disposal method is beneficial to vultures. A local model of ‘debt-
for-nature swap’ is proposed to protect the nesting habitat of vultures in the area. Integrated vulture conservation and development
programs may provide incentives to local people to initiate conservation actions.
INTRODUCTION
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis was once
abundant in South-East Asia, and the Indian subconti¬
nent. Vultures have declined from many parts of their
former ranges owing to food shortages and loss of
habitat (Pain et al. 2003). However, since the early
1990s there has been a catastrophic decline in three
Gyps species in the Indian subcontinent: White-
rumped, Indian G. indicus and Slender-billed Vultures
G. tenuirostris (Prakash 1999, Virani et al. 2001,
Prakash et al. 2003). In response to these population
crashes, all three were reclassified as ‘Critically
Endangered’, placing them among the species most
threatened with global extinction (BirdLife
International 2001).
Recent work in Pakistan has showed that
diclofenac, a widely used painkiller and anti-inflamma¬
tory drug administered to livestock and humans, can
cause mortality in vultures (Oaks et al. 2004). A
postmortem examination of dead or dying birds from
India and Nepal also showed the high incidence of
To Aryabhanjyan
Figure 1. Map showing the study area and its location in Nepal.
88
NABIN BARAL et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
diclofenac residues and visceral gout (Shultz et al.
2004). The results of these studies suggest that
diclofenac contamination is the major cause of the
recent vulture population crashes. The result of a
mathematical modelling is consistent with the
observed rate of population decline. Models indicate
that only a small proportion (one in 130) of carcasses
contaminated with lethal levels of diclofenac can cause
the observed vulture mortality rate (Green et al. 2004).
We suspect the widespread use of diclofenac in Nepal,
but so far there has been no attempt to quantify the
extent of its use or the levels to which vultures are
exposed.
Eight species of vultures have been recorded from
Nepal, of which six are resident and two are migratory
(Grimmett et al. 2000). White-rumped Vulture is
reported up to 3,100 m, although it is most common
up to about 1,000 m (Inskipp and Inskipp 1985).
Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (KTWR), Royal
Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve (RSWR) and the unpro¬
tected Rampur Valley are still strongholds for the
species (Inskipp and Inskipp 2001, Virani et al. 2001,
Baral and Gautam 2002). Vulture population declines
may have gone unnoticed for many years simply
because they were so abundant. Although data are
scant, the monitoring of colonies indicates that Gyps
vulture populations have been declining throughout
their range in Nepal (Virani et al. 2001, Giri and GC
2002). Once distributed throughout the lowlands of
Nepal, White-rumped Vulture is now patchily distrib¬
uted, being rarer in the east (Inskipp and Inskipp 2001,
Virani et al. 2001, Baral and Gautam 2002, Giri and
GC 2002). During 2001-2002, 45 White-rumped
Vultures were found dead in eastern Nepal, compared
to only five in western Nepal (Virani et al. 2001, Giri
and GC 2002). This suggests that mortality factors
were less prevalent in the west or it may reflect lower
survey effort in the east. Continued population
declines may lead to extirpation unless remedial
actions are taken.
In Nepal, only nine bird species — Black Stork
Ciconia nigra. White Stork C. ciconia, Himalayan Monal
Lophophorus impejanus, Satyr Tragopan Tragopan satyra,
Cheer Pheasant Catreus wallichii, Bengal Florican
Houbaropsis bengalensis, Lesser Florican Sypheotides
indica, Sarus Crane Grus antigone and Great Hornbill
Buceros bicornis — are protected by law (HMG 1977).
No raptors are included. Accidental or deliberate perse¬
cution of vultures outside protected areas is not illegal.
In this paper, we estimate the population size,
pattern of adult mortality and breeding success of
White-rumped Vulture in the Rampur Valley, Nepal.
STUDY AREA
Rampur Valley (27°51'80"N 83°54'24"E, Fig 1.) lies in
the eastern part of Palpa district, and is the second
biggest business centre in the district. It has three
Village Development Committees (the smallest politi¬
cal and administrative unit in rural Nepal). It is about
370 km south-west of Kathmandu, situated in the
transition region between terai and hill ecological
zones, at an elevation of 442 m. The Kali Gandaki
River flows through the valley and marks its northern
border. The climate of the area is subtropical
monsoonal, with the rainy season extending from June
to September, hot dry summer from February to May,
and cool dry winter from October to January. The
vegetation is in an early to middle successional stage.
The dominant trees are kapok Bombax ceiba, khair
Acacia catechu, karma Adina cordifolia, bel Aegle
marmelos, mango Mangifera indica, kamuno Cleistocalyx
operculata, kali katha Aporusa octandra and budho-
dhayar Lagerstromia parviflora. As well as
White-rumped Vulture, die valley supports Slender-
billed, Red-headed Sarcogyps calvus and Egyptian
Vultures Neophron percnopterus. As part of community
forestry programmes, there are 56 community forest
user groups in Rampur, of which 44 groups already
have their parcel of forests to manage. The valley is not
contiguous with any protected area.
METHODS
As the study area in the Rampur Valley is small, it was
practical to count regularly and accurately all nest and
roost sites. We visited all six known colonies and
counted all birds seen on nests or roosting early in the
morning (06h30-09h30) and late in the evening
(17h30-19h30) on five visits during 27 October to 2
November 2002, 12-16 December 2002, 23-27
February 2003, 10-14 April 2003 and 18-23 May
Table 1. Estimated population size of White-rumped Vulture at six colonies.
Sites not covered during surveys
Forktail 21 (2005)
Population status and breeding ecology of White-rumped Vulture
89
2003. We assumed fidelity to sites, fixed time of
roosting, and geographic closure: no movement into
(immigration) or out of (emigration) the site. We
counted the number of animal carcasses encountered
and the number of vultures at each one to assess the
availability of food in the survey area. To study
breeding ecology, nests were counted and nest
occupancy, breeding status and general breeding
behaviour were recorded. We followed Postupalsky’s
(1974) classification of nesting status, according to
which ‘occupied nests’ are those in which substantial
nest-building activities are observed, but egg-laying is
not necessarily confirmed. Nesting trees were tagged
for future reference. Birds were closely observed for
‘head drooping’ behaviour, regarded by some as an
abnormal behaviour of sick birds (Prakash, 2001) but
by others a response to high temperatures (Virani et al.
2001). Colonies were opportunistically searched for
dead vultures, which were recorded and then buried.
We conducted a questionnaire survey of 67 households
in the vicinity of vulture colonies. Respondents were
asked about their methods of carcass disposal, persecu¬
tion of vultures, agricultural practices and conservation
attitudes. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to test the
null hypothesis of uniform distribution of nests among
nesting trees. Means are presented ± 1 standard devia¬
tion.
RESULTS
Population
We found six colonies of vultures in Rampur Valley.
The average distance between colonies was 4.1 ±2.1
km (N=15, minimum=0.2 km between Islampur and
Sadwarta, maximum=7.1 km between Islampur and
Syanja). During the study period one colony
(Islampur) was deserted because local people felled the
nesting and roosting trees. The population of White-
rumped Vultures in the Rampur Valley averaged 85±12
birds (range=72-102, N=7) during the breeding
season, and 123 birds (N=l) after the breeding season
(Table l).The largest colony was at Khairini, support¬
ing 33-48 individuals. Counts of vultures at carcasses
are consistent with these numbers. Counts of vultures
at carcasses averaged 63±20 birds (range=36-93 birds,
N=9). Immatures and adults could not be clearly
distinguished, so the age structure of the vulture
population could not be assessed. A total of 33 dead
vultures was recorded, of which 30 were adults and
three were subadults and juveniles. This total included
16 found dead in December 2002 at Khairini and
Sadawarta. We did not record any birds showing ‘head
drooping’ behaviour.
Nesting and breeding
White-rumped Vultures bred from October to April. A
total of 70 occupied nests were found in the six vulture
colonies. Abandoned nests were frequently encoun¬
tered, but the causes of nest abandonment could not
be determined. The proportion of nests that was
abandoned increased through the season, from 7% in
October/November to 29% in April (Fig. 2). This may
be because nests are abandoned once chicks die.
Nesting success was 50% (and equates to 0.5 chicks
per nest) based on the proportion of all occupied nests
that still had chicks alive in April 2003, assuming that
all these would successfully fledge (none was left in the
nest in May 2003). Since we could not survey colonies
subsequently, we were not able to determine the fledg¬
ling mortality rate. Nests were built in a total of 56
trees of five species at the six colonies (Table 2). Up to
three nests were built in each tree, but most trees
(77%) had just one nest (mean=l ,2±0.45). Most nests
(86%) were built in kapok trees (x2= 152.2, df=4, P<
0.01).
Oct/Nov 2002 Dec 2002 Feb 2003 April 2003
Figure 2. Percentage of nests that were occupied (solid bars)
or abandoned (open bars).
90
NAB IN BARAL et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Food availability
The biomass of potential food available from native
wildlife is limited, so domestic livestock carcasses are
likely to form the bulk of available food. We found 16
such carcasses during the study. Most (69%) were
cattle, followed by water buffalo (25%). We could not
determine the cause of livestock death. Not all
carcasses had attendant vultures: only three carcasses
were fully consumed, nine were partially consumed
and four were unattended by vultures. On two
occasions, four Egyptian Vultures Neophron
percnopterus and two Red-headed Vultures Sarcogyps
calvus were seen feeding with White-rumped Vultures.
At six carcasses we found a few (3-10) stray dogs
feeding.
Conservation attitudes
Local people apparently do not kill vultures in the
Rampur Valley. A high proportion of respondents
(99%, N=67) reported that they had never killed or
seen anybody persecuting and poisoning vultures by
any means. In one incident, children inadvertently
killed one vulture while playing with catapults. The
carcass disposal practice in the study area was benefi¬
cial to vultures. When asked what they do with dead
livestock, 63% of respondents said they left carcasses in
an open place, while 24% bury them. Local people had
favourable attitudes towards vulture conservation.
When asked whether we should conserve vultures,
85% said ‘yes’ while 15% said ‘no’ (N=67). The
reasons given for vulture conservation were: sanitation
(77% of respondents), aesthetics (7%), ecological role
(9%) and medicinal purposes (7%). Although not
quantified, the use of pesticides and chemical fertilisers
was common practice among local farmers. Informal
discussions indicated that local people were not aware
of the potential adverse health effects of these chemi¬
cals on humans and wildlife. Diclofenac as a possible
cause of vulture mortality was not known by us during
the fieldwork, so we did not collect information on the
extent of its use.
DISCUSSION
A population crash is taking place in three species of
Gyps vultures in the Indian subcontinent, involving
high mortality rates and breeding failure (Prakash
2001). It is likely to lead to their extinction if the
causes are not addressed (BirdLife International
2001). In the Rampur Valley, we found 72-102 White-
rumped Vultures at six colonies during the breeding
season, with a 50% breeding success at 70 occupied
nests. Of considerable concern, we found 33 dead
vultures, including 30 adults. In Koshi Tappu Wildlife
Reserve (eastern Nepal), Virani et al. (2001) reported
a high fledgling mortality rate (50%), and only 28% of
67 nests successfully fledged young. In Rampur, we
found that the proportion of abandoned nests
increased from 7% to 29% towards the end of the
breeding season, perhaps because of high nestling
mortality. The breeding productivity of 0.5 chicks per
occupied nest is higher than recorded for other parts
of Nepal (Virani et al. 2001, Giri and GC 2002, Baral,
2002), but similar to the 0.48 fledglings/pair measured
for other Gyps species in Africa (Martinez et al. 1997).
However, our estimate may be inflated by the assump¬
tion that all chicks alive in April would survive to
fledge successfully. If true, it implies that breeding
failure is not causing population declines in the
Rampur Valley.
In India, nesting and roosting habitats for the
species are considered to be abundant (Prakash 2001).
In Rampur, these could be limiting factors because the
valley has sparse vegetation. Vultures mainly use kapok
trees for nesting in the valley. These trees are commer¬
cially important to enable the Community Forest User
Group (CFUG) to collect revenue, so logging of trees
may limit the nest-site availability. At Khairini, local
people informed us that they planned to log some
mature kapok trees, including some that held vulture
nests. We informed the district forest office and the
logging was prevented, at least temporarily. We recom¬
mend piloting a local model of ‘debt-for-nature swap’
to protect critical habitats for vultures. A non-govern¬
mental organisation could buy mature kapok trees at a
competitive market price and deposit the amount in
the CFUG’s bank account. In this way, local people
would have the incentive to protect forests and to
utilise the funds for integrated vulture conservation
and development projects.
Nepal is a Hindu kingdom, so slaughtering of cattle
is forbidden by law. Local people rarely eat beef. As
livestock form the bulk of the species’s diet, the food
supply is unlikely to be limiting. At present, the
population density of stray dogs is low. In India,
vulture declines have led to increases in feral dog
numbers, with associated human health risks
(Cunningham et al. 2001, Pain et al. 2003). This
problem may increase in Nepal if vultures continue to
decline.
Land-use patterns influence raptor diversity and
density (Herremans and Herremans-Tonnoeyr 2000).
In Africa, Brandi et al. (1985) reported a negative
correlation between human impact on the landscape
and raptor diversity and density. However, vultures
have the highest density at the interface between
protected and unprotected areas (Herremans and
Herremans-Tonnoeyr 2000). In the Rampur Valley, all
six vulture colonies abut human settlements. Given
this, protection of the sites could be a feasible and cost-
effective conservation strategy. In addition, given their
Critically Endangered status and pivotal ecological
role, the three Gyps vultures should be added to the
protected species list of the 1973 National Parks and
Wildlife Conservation Act. Most importantly and
urgently, now that the main cause of the vulture
population decline has been discovered to be
diclofenac (Oaks et al. 2004), the use of this drug needs
to be banned, and stocks replaced with a safe alterna¬
tive. An effective captive breeding population needs to
be built up while this is being achieved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Oriental Bird Club for funding the
project. Special thanks to staff of Bird Conservation Nepal for their
cooperation. We acknowledge our gratitude to Carol Inskipp,
Forktail 21 (2005)
Population status and breeding ecology of White-rumped Vulture
91
Suzanne Shultz, Munir Virani and JoelT. Heinen for their comments
while preparing the manuscript. We would like to thank Richard
Cuthbert of RSPB for reviewing the manuscript. We thank Gautam
Benu, Madhav Bashyal, Akbar Ali Khan, Pradip Regmi, and Pranaya
Chhetri for their assistance in the field, the owner of Manakamana
Lodge for cosy accommodation, and local people for their coopera¬
tion and support.
REFERENCES
Baral, H. R. (2002) Collapse of vulture population in Lumbini.
Danphe 11(4): 4-5.
Baral, N. and Gautam, R. (2002) Status of White-rumped Vulture
Gyps bengalensis in Rampur Valley, Nepal. Oriental Bird Club Bull.
36: 46-48
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BmlLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International
Brandi, R., Utschick, H. and Schmidtke, K. (1985) Raptors and
land-use systems in southern Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 23: 1 1-20.
Cunningham, A. A., Prakash, V., Ghalsasi, G. R. and Pain, D. (2001)
Investigating the cause of catastrophic declines in Asian griffon
vultures, Gyps indicus and G. bengalensis. Pp. 10-11 in T. Katzner
and J. Parry-Jones (eds) Reports from the workshop on Indian Gyps
vultures, 4tl Eurasian congress on raptors, Sevilla, Spain, September
2001. Seville, Spain: Estacion Biologica Donana Raptor
Research Foundation.
Giri, J. B. and GC, S. (2002) Study of vultures in western lowland
Nepal. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 36: 1 1-13.
Green R. E., Newton, I, Shultz, S., Cunningham, A. A., Gilbet, M.,
Pain, D. J. and Prakash, V. (2004) Diclofenac poisoning as a
cause of vulture population declines across the Indian subconti¬
nent. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 793-800.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp,T. (2000) Birds of Nepal. New
Delhi: Prakash Book Depot.
Herremans, M. and Herremans-Tonnoeyr, D. (2000) Land use and
the conservation status of raptors in Botswana. Biol. Conserv. 94:
31-41.
His Majesty’s Government (1977) National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation Act 2029 (1973). Kathmandu: Ministry of Law and
Justice.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1985) A guide to the birds of Nepal. India:
UBS.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2001) A re-visit to Nepal’s lowland
protected areas. Danphe 10: 4-7.
Martinez, F., Rodriguez, R. F. and Blanco, G. (1997) Effects of
monitoring frequency on estimates of abundance, age distribu¬
tion, and productivity of colonial Griffon Vultures. J. Field
Ornithol. 68(3): 392-399.
Oaks, J. L., Gilbert, M, Virani, M. Z., Watson, R.T., Meteyer, C. U.,
Rideout, B. A., Shivaprasad, H. L., Ahmed, S., Chaudhry, M. J.
I., Arshad, M., Mahmood, S., Ali, A. and Khan, A. A. (2004)
Diclofenac residues as the cause of population decline of
vultures in Pakistan. Nature 427: 630-633.
Pain, D. J., Cunningham, A. A., Donald, P. F., Duckworth, J. W.,
Houston, D. C., Katzner, T., Parry-Jones, J., Poole, C., Prakash,
V., Round, P. and Timmins, R. (2003) Causes and effects of
temporospatial declines of Gyps vultures in Asia. Conserv. Biol.
17(3): 661-671
Postupalsky, S. (1974) Raptor reproductive success: some problems
with methods, criteria, and terminology. Pp. 21-31 in F. N.
Hamestrom Jr., B. E. Harrell and R. R. Olendorff (eds).
Proceedings of the conference on raptor conservation techniques. Fort
Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
Prakash, V. (1999) Status of vultures in Keoladeo National Park,
Bharatpur, Rajasthan, with special reference to population crash
in Gyps species. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 96: 365-378.
Prakash, V. (2001) Status and distribution of vultures in India with
special reference to the population crash in Gyps species. Pp. 4-6
in T. Katzner and J. Parry-Jones (eds) Reports from the workshop
on Indian Gyps vultures, 4th Eurasian congress on raptors, Sevilla,
Spain, September 2001 . Seville, Spain: Estacion Biologica Donana
Raptor Research Foundation.
Prakash, V., Pain, D. J., Cunningham, A. A., Donald, P. F., Prakash,
N., Verma, A., Gargi, R., Sivakumar, S. and Rahamani, A. R.
(2003) Catastrophic collapse of Indian white-backed Gyps
bengalensis and long-billed Gyps indicus vulture populations. Biol.
Conserv. 109: 381-390.
Sharma, I. K. (1969) Breeding of the Indian white-backed vulture at
Jodhpur. Ostrich 41(3): 205-207.
Shultz, S., Baral, H. S., Charman, S., Cunningham, A. A. , Das, D.,
Ghalsasi, G. R., Goudar, M. S., Green, R. E., Jones, A., Nighot,
P., Pain, D. J. and Prakash, V. (2004) Diclofenac poisoning is
widespread in declining vulture populations across the Indian
subcontinent. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.): doi
10.1098/rsbl. 2004. 0223.
Virani, M., Gilbert, M., Watson, R., Oaks, L., Benson, R, Kham, A.
A., Baral, H. S. and Giri, J. B. (2001) Asian vulture crisis project:
field results from Pakistan and Nepal for the 2000-2001 field
season. Pp. 7-9 in T. Katzner and J. Parry-Jones (eds) Reports
from the workshop on Indian Gyps vultures, 4th Eurasian congress on
raptors, Sevilla, Spain, September 2001. Seville, Spain: Estacion
Biologica Donana Raptor Research Foundation.
Nabin Baral, Department of Environmental Studies, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, U.S.A.
Email: nbaral@yours.com
Ramji Gautam, Department of Zoology, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara, Nepal. Email: gautamramji@yahoo.com
Bijay Tamang, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Box 110410, Gainesville, FL 32611-
0410, U.S.A. Email: bijay@ufl.edu
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 93-98
Raptor migration in east Bali, Indonesia:
observations from a bottleneck watch site
FRANCESCO GERMI
A migration bottleneck site for raptors was located near the easternmost point of Bali, on the eastern slopes of the Seraya Range. On
16 days during 24 October to 19 November 2004, a total of 7,169 raptors of four species was observed crossing the Lombok Strait
in an eastward direction. The four species were, in decreasing order of abundance, Chinese Sparrowhawk Accipiter soloensis. Oriental
Honey-buzzard Pernis ptilorhyncus, Japanese Sparrowhawk A. gularis and Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus. Chinese Sparrowhawk,
contrary to conclusions from previous studies and reviews, was the commonest migrant sparrowhawk in Bali. Booted Eagle was
recorded for the first time inWallacea. In order to locate the migration routes and other possible crossing points, an additional 19 days
were spent in October-November at nine other locations in the eastern half of Bali, where another 1,263 migrating raptors were
counted. Another three days were spent on the island of Nusa Penida, which provides a shorter water crossing route between Bali and
Lombok, but no raptors were observed.
INTRODUCTION
Indonesia is an important wintering area for several
species of birds breeding in the eastern Palearctic. The
migration of raptors in the East Asian Flyway from
north-east to south-east Asia is still, however, poorly
understood (McClure 1998, Zalles and Bildstein 2000,
DeCandido et al. 2004), and for Indonesia in particu¬
lar there are very few data for the eastern and northern
part of the archipelago. Hence the routes taken by
migrating raptors inWallacea are still largely unknown
(White and Bruce 1986, MacKinnon and Philipps
1993, del Hoyo et al. 1994, Coates and Bishop 1997,
Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
After the discovery in October 1982 of large
numbers of raptors migrating from Java to Bali (Ash
1982, 1984, Ash et al. 1987), the first structured study
on this migration was carried out in Bali Barat (West
Figure 1. Map of the Seraya Range, east Bali, with the arrows showing direction of flight and crossing points for migrating
raptors.
94
FRANCESCO GERMI
Forktail 21 (2005)
Bali) National Park in 1990 (Ash 1993), followed by a
brief survey in 1994 (Mason 1994, 1995). Subsequent
work was undertaken in Java at Puncak Pass and Dieng
Mountains, in 1998, 1999 and 2001 by Nijman
(200 1 a, b, 2003, in press), and additional irregular
counts have been carried out subsequently by organi¬
sations such as Yayasan Kokokan Bali (a local NGO)
and Himbio Udayana University (V. Nijman and W.
Sukmantoro in litt. 2004).
During 3 October-25 November 2004, a survey
was carried out in eastern Bali, with the aim to locate
the main migration routes and crossing points to the
Lombok Strait, and to undertake the first counts of
raptors migrating from Bali to the Wallacean subre¬
gion.
STUDY SITE
main route in eastern Bali is from the central mountain
spine into the Seraya Range, a 16-day sampling count
was carried out atTinjalas between 24 October and 19
November 2004, totalling 85 hours of observation.
From Tinjalas, raptors were observed crossing the
strait on a 4 km long front of coastline. A pair of 10x42
binoculars and a compass were used. V. Mason joined
and helped counting on some days; on others days P.
Asmara’, a villager from Tinjalas, helped in spotting the
passing raptors. Counting started at around 06h30,
roughly 30 minutes after sunrise, until 12h30. On
some days, observations continued until 16h30, with a
two-hour break at midday to mitigate observer fatigue.
The sky above the Seraya Range was constantly
scanned using binoculars. White cumulus clouds, when
present, facilitated the detection of migrants. Raptors
were followed until they disappeared from view in the
Lombok Strait, into the clouds or at high altitude.
The study was conducted at several sites in the eastern
half of Bali, mainly in the eastern part of the Seraya
Range in Karangasem district (Fig. 1). The Seraya
Range runs in a west-east direction, and is formed by
four forested peaks: Mt Bisbis, Mt Seraya, Mt Maspait
and Mt Nampu. Mt Seraya, at 1,21 1 m, is the highest
peak. The eastern part of the range slopes steeply
toward the Lombok Strait. With the exception of the
highest mountain slopes, which are covered in
remnants of mixed deciduous and evergreen primary
and secondary forest, the slopes of the range are
terrace-cultivated with maize Zea sp., kapok Ceiba sp.
and palms Borassus sp. and Cocos sp.
Eastern Bali is one of the driest parts of the island,
with less than 1,500 mm rainfall and 5-8 dry months
each year (Whitten et al. 1996). During the 16 days
counting at Seraya, the cumulus cloud cover never
exceeded c. 40-50%, mainly concentrating above the
Seraya Range and above the coastal slopes. No rain was
recorded during the observation days. The average
daily temperature in October-November is 27-29"C.
The wind direction was constantly from S-SE.
After reconnaissance, a watch site was located on
the top of a prominent hill 200 m south of the settle¬
ment of Tinjalas, in the administrative county of Seraya
Timur, at 08 ’24'S 115°41'E, hereafter referred to as
Tinjalas. The hill is 307 m high, 2 km from the range
crest and 1 km from the coast, with a flat open top, and
maize-terraced cultivations on its flanks. A full 360°
view is achievable from the top, spanning from the
Seraya Range to the north-west, to the Lombok Strait
(here 35 km wide, at its narrowest) in the east, and the
island of Nusa Penida to the south-west. The islands of
Lombok and Nusa Penida are visible on clear days.
METHODS
To determine the main migration routes, 14 days were
spent along the east coast of Bah (Nusa Dua,
Tanjungbenoa, Serangan island, Nusa Penida island,
East Seraya, Tulamben), and eight days in the central-
eastern mountain spine (Mt Batukaru, Lake
Tamblingan, Kubusalia, Mt Agung, Tirtagangga, West
Seraya) (Table 1). After initial data suggested that the
RESULTS
In 16 sampling days atTinjalas, a total of 7,169 migrat¬
ing raptors were counted, most of them directly
observed crossing the Lombok Strait in the direction of
Lombok (Figs. 2-3). Four species were identified:
Chinese Sparrowhawk Accipiter soloensis (2,713
individuals, 38% of the total), Japanese Sparrowhawk
A. gularis (324 individuals, 5%), Oriental Honey-
buzzard Pernis ptilorhyncus (1,608 individuals, 22%)
and Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus (five individuals,
0.07%). An additional 2,519 unidentified Accipiter spp.
individuals were counted, representing 35% of the
total and 45% of sparrowhawks. In the early morning
hours, when low flying allowed easier sparrowhawk
identification, Chinese Sparrowhawk was always the
most common species (89% of identified
sparrowhawks), suggesting the majority of the uniden¬
tified birds were also of this species. This is in contrast
with Ash’s findings for Bali Barat (1993), but in accor¬
dance with subsequent studies in Bali and Java (Mason
1994, 1995, Nijman 2001a, b, in press). Resident
raptor species observed regularly at Tinjalas were
Changeable Hawk-eagle Spizaetus cirrhatus (singles on
five October-November dates), Black Eagle Ictinaetus
malayensis (a pair and one juvenile on seven
October-November dates). Crested Serpent Eagle
Spilornis cheela (2-3 individuals observed on most
Date
Figure 2. Daily totals of passing raptors atTinjalas, east Bali,
October-November 2004.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Raptor migration in east Bali, Indonesia
95
days), and Spotted Kestrel Falco moluccensis (2-4
individuals observed daily).
The first raptors (both sparrowhawks and honey-
buzzards) were observed crossing the strait as early as
06h40, and the last were at 16h20. The main visible
passage occurred in between 09h00 and llhOO, but
was also noted to be significant in the late afternoon,
Date
Date
Date
Date
Figure 3. Daily totals of Chinese Sparrowhawks, Japanese
Sparrowhawks, unidentified sparrowhawks and Oriental
Honey-buzzards at Tinjalas, east Bali, October-November
2004.
especially for Oriental Honey-buzzard, which appeared
to be more capable than sparrowhawks of crossing
when thermal activity was weak. The midday hours
were less productive, when the passage appeared to be
at its lowest, or birds were simply flying too high to be
detected by a ground observer. Sparrowhawks and
Oriental Honey-buzzard flew very high by midday, and
were difficult to locate even with binoculars. Large
flocks of sparrowhawks often appeared in the sky above
the Seraya Range at c. 1,500 m, and gained altitude by
gliding from one thermal to another before crossing
the sea. Such high flying behaviour occurred mainly
from lOhOO onward, correlated with the increase of
thermal activity, and decreased in the afternoon, when
passage was reduced anyway. Observations of large
flocks disappearing at high altitude or in clouds after
lOhOO suggest that a large proportion of raptors were
undetectable by midday. By 16h00, two hours before
dusk, the passage apparently decreased, with only a few
birds seen crossing.
On days of strong S-SE wind, raptors were
observed soaring longer than usual near the crossing
points, and finally crossing at an angle to compensate
for the wind direction. Oriental Honey-buzzards often
engaged in flapping-flight while crossing at low
altitude, especially early morning and afternoon, when
thermal activity was weak. The two sparrowhawk
species apparently showed more reluctance in crossing
the water, soaring longer above the coastal slopes, and
at greater heights in thermals before undertaking the
crossing. On occasions, single individuals or small
flocks of sparrowhawks and honey-buzzards were seen
turning back from the strait and landing on the coastal
slopes. Multi- and single-species flocks occurred daily,
formed mainly in soaring conditions, but also during
gliding between thermals. The two sparrowhawk
species often flocked together or with honey-buzzards.
The largest monospecific flocks of each species were
170 Chinese Sparrowhawks on 31 October, seven
Japanese Sparrowhawks on 24 October and 15
Oriental Honey-buzzards on 24 October. Two of the
five Booted Eagles were seen together in a flock of
seven honey-buzzards on 15 November. The two
sparrowhawks and Oriental Honey-buzzard were often
observed flying above forest on the Seraya Range
shortly after sunrise, indicating that it is used as a
roosting site.
No movements of raptors were recorded on Nusa
Penida during three observation days (13, 20, and 30
October, Table 1), although intervening and subse¬
quent days at Tinjalas proved to yield a large passage.
Movements of raptors were also recorded on the
central mountain spine (south of Mt Batukaru, south
of Mt Agung, Table 1), where 1,263 migrating raptors
were counted. This finding, combined with very few
sightings during three days of observation on the
northern side of the mountains (at Kubusalia and Lake
Tamblingan), reinforced the hypothesis that the
southern side of the mountains is used as a ‘leading
line’ (Mason 1995). However, the relatively small
number of raptors counted at peak migration might be
because of low cloud cover over mountain areas,
reducing the visibility of flying birds. No significant
raptor movements were recorded in the south-east of
Bali nor on the north-east coast.
96
FRANCESCO GERMI
Forktail 21 (2005)
DISCUSSION
The observations and counts at different sites in
eastern Bali indicate that the Seraya Range is an inter¬
nationally significant bottleneck for migrating raptors
(Zalles and Bildstein 2000). Most of the raptors
migrating from western to eastern Indonesia during
the northern autumn can be monitored from Tinjalas.,
and the numbers counted indicate that Wallacea is an
important wintering area for raptors of eastern
Palearctic origin. Further investigation in eastern
Indonesia is required to determine their final destina¬
tion. Very few records of the three main species
observed crossing the Lombok Strait are known for the
western Lesser Sundas, and none has been previously
recorded in Lombok (White and Bruce 1986, Andrew
1992, Coates and Bishop 1997, van Balen 1998),
denoting the currently poor knowledge of migrating
raptors’ distribution in the region.
Previous studies in Bali and Java have recorded
totals of 11,000 raptors in 32 days (9 October-9
November 1990) in Bali Barat (Ash 1993), 5,255 in 3
days (16-18 October 1994) in Bali Barat (Mason
1994) and 3,700 in 66 days (autumns 1998, 1999 and
2001) in Dieng Mountains, Java (Nijman in press).
Nijman (in press) estimated that 29,000 migrant
raptors pass the Dieng Mountains annually. In East
Bali, the 7,200 raptors observed at Tinjalas in 16 days
during the second half of the season suggest that total
numbers may be higher than the 29,000 extrapolated
by Nijman. Moreover, migrants were still passing
during the last observation day (19 November),
suggesting that the migration continued into late
November. The count period at Tinjalas was late in the
migration season compared with previous studies and
therefore provides insights into the latter stages of the
migration period. Oriental Honey-buzzard passage
showed a marked second peak after mid-November.
For Chinese Sparrowhawk, numbers indicate that the
passage was ending towards the second half of
November, while this pattern was less marked for
Japanese Sparrowhawk.
The observation of five Booted Eagles crossing the
Lombok Strait in mid-November (three on 15
November and two on 19 November, all dark morphs)
indicates that this species winters in Wallacea, despite
the lack of previous records (White and Bruce 1986,
Andrew 1992, van Balen 1994, Coates and Bishop
1997). Single individuals are reported rarely in Bali
and Java (Ash 1982, 1984, MacKinnon and Phillipps
1993, Nijman 2001b, 2003).
The large proportion of unidentified sparrowhawks
is similar to previous figures reported in other studies
in the region (Nijman 200 1 a, b, in press). During a
survey in west Bali, Mason (1994: 6) stated that
‘practically all birds flew over at a great height, barely,
if at all, visible to the naked eye... they were probably
flying too high and fast to enable detection against a
brilliant blue sky and uncomfortably close to the sun’.
Kerlinger (1989) compared results from simultaneous
radar and visual observations in New Jersey, and
showed that at more than 1,500 m distance, most
raptors could not be identified visually, even using
binoculars or a spotting scope.
Differences in maximum flight altitudes recorded in
tropical and temperate latitudes (Smith 1980,
Table 1. Migrating raptors counted at sites in east Bali in October-November 2004.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Raptor migration in east Bali, Indonesia
97
Kerlinger 1989) suggest that thermal lift may be much
stronger in warmer climates, and flight altitude conse¬
quently higher compared to temperate climates. It is
extremely unlikely that no passage occurred at the time
of day with the strongest thermal activity and hence the
best soaring conditions. Observation at Tinjalas
suggests that large numbers of individuals were still
crossing by midday, but too high to be detected. Smith
(1980, 1985) cited reports by pilots in Panama that
migrating raptors often attained heights of
3, 600-4, 000m between llhOO and 13h30 on days of
favourable thermal activity, and suggested these as
possible explanations for the so-called ‘noon-day lull’.
For these reasons, the count results are subject to an
important quantitative bias, because the figures reflect
only the visible migration, which represents an
unknown proportion of the real passage. Thus no
attempt has been made to estimate numbers in this
study, and only counts of observed individuals are
reported.
There is an interesting discrepancy between
authors regarding the proportion and numbers of
Japanese to Chinese Sparrowhawks. Ash (1993)
reported a ratio of Japanese to Chinese Sparrowhawks
of 8.4:1. However, Nijman (2001b) in Java found
Chinese Sparrowhawk to be ten times more common
than Japanese Sparrowhawk. I found a very similar
ratio in east Bali, where Chinese Sparrowhawk repre¬
sented 89% of identified sparrowhawks. Ash’s results
may be because of the apparently unfavourable
watching conditions at Teluk Terima, the watch site
used in Bali Barat National Park. At this site, which is
on a beach at sea level, many passing raptors are
observed at very high altitude or in the distance
(personal observations 2004), and hence identification
is extremely difficult. During a survey at this site,
Mason (1994: 6) stated that ‘it was impossible to
distinguish the accipiters at such distance, and it
seemed futile to make the attempt’. The issue is
discussed in detail elsewhere (Nijman et al. in prep.). In
mainland South-East Asia, the data are also contradic¬
tory. Wells (1999) reported Japanese Sparrowhawk to
be far more common than Chinese Sparrowhawk in
peninsular Malaysia, but with significant fluctuations
during recent decades, whilst DeCandido et al. (2004)
counted 57,667 Chinese Sparrowhawks but only 5,81 1
Japanese Sparrowhawks in a recent study in southern
Thailand. These data match the ratio found in Java and
Bali (Nijman et al. in prep.).
Assuming that the birds crossing at Tinjalas
followed the Malacca-Sumatra-Java-Bali route, the
Lombok Strait is the fourth water crossing encoun¬
tered after leaving mainland South-East Asia, and the
longest after Tanjung Tuan in Malaysia. In a straight
line, the crossing from East Seraya to Lombok involves
a flight of 35 km above water at its narrowest point.
Nusa Penida provides potentially the shortest water
crossing route between Bali and Lombok, with only
22 km of water to cross. The position of the island,
interposed in between Bali and Lombok in the strait,
makes it an apparently ideal ‘stepping stone’ for
migrating birds.
The scarcity of winter records for the four species
might be a consequence of the lack of observers, and it
is extremely likely that some individuals winter on Bali.
Indeed, there have been recent irregular sightings of
both sparrowhawks and Oriental Honey-buzzards in
the Ubud area of Bali throughout the boreal winter (V.
Mason in litt. 2005).
Threats and recommendations
The forested areas on the higher slopes of the Seraya
Range are used for roosting by migrating raptors.
Current logging activity will reduce suitable roosting
sites in the foreseeable future. Local villagers complain
about predation by raptors on domestic poultry
through the year, although this probably involves
resident species. No evidence of direct persecution in
the area was found, and no information is currently
available on possible trapping activity for the
widespread cagebird trade in Indonesia.
Bildstein and Zalles (1995) suggested that raptor
migration watch sites remain a largely untapped but
potentially substantial source of ecotourism revenue.
With this in mind, the migrating raptors concentrating
in Seraya are potentially a valuable asset for the local
economy, and offer an opportunity for developing
ecotourism activities. Bali, which is by far the most
popular tourist destination in Indonesia, already
receives over two million visitors a year (Whitten et al.
1996). The creation of a protected area covering raptor
roost sites in Seraya might provide a new sustainable
resource to the local economy. Well-known success
stories in raptor migration tourism, like the Hawk
Mountain Sanctuary in Pennsylvania or the
International Birding and Research Center in Eilat,
Israel, show that this can be successful.
Additional monitoring work is required at Tinjalas
and further east in Wallacea, as in western Indonesia.
Traditional count methods combined with motorised
glider and radar counts are recommended in order to
obtain more reliable and complete data.
Radiotelemetry should be used to answer questions on
migration pathways, flight strategies, habitat usage and
distribution, among others. International researchers
and Indonesian NGOs should join efforts in order to
coordinate future work more effectively.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I owe much gratitude to Victor Mason for valuable information, time
shared in the mountains of Bali and for useful comments to the first
draft; Nick Blackbeard who kindly supplied me with the necessary
cartography; Putu Asmara’ for his help at Tinjalas; Giuseppe
Carpaneto and Alberto Zocchi for critical assessment of the
manuscript; Vincent Nijman for constructive help; Wishnu
Sukmantoro for many useful contacts in Indonesia; Vanessa Wise and
Andrew Midgley for editing the English text; Ray Harris and Doreen
Phillips for creating the maps; and Keith Bildstein who greatly
improved the final version of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P. (1992) The birds of Indonesia: a checklist (Peters’ sequence).
Jakarta: Indonesian Ornithological Society.
Ash, J. S. (1982) Birds of Bali 1981-1982. Unpublished.
Ash, J. S. (1984) Bird observations on Bali. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 104:
24-35.
Ash, J. S. (1993) Raptor migration on Bali, Indonesia. Forktail 9:
3-11.
98
FRANCESCO GERMI
Forktail 21 (2005)
Ash, J. S., van Helvoort, B. E. and Mason, V. N. (1987) Check-list of
the birds of Bali. Unpublished.
Bildstein, K. L. and Zalles, J. I., eds. (1995) Raptor migration watch-
site manual. Kemp ton, U.S.A.: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary
Association.
van Balen, S. (1994) The status and conservation of birds of prey in
the Sondaic andWallacean regions of Indonesia. Pp. 245-254 in
B.-U. Meyburg, and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptor conservation
today. Robertsbridge, U.K.: Pica Press and World Working
Group on Birds of Prey.
van Balen, S. (1998) Tropical forest raptors in Indonesia: recent
information on distribution, status and conservation. J. Raptor
Res. 32: 56-63.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop. K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland: Dove Publications.
DeCandido, R., Nualsri, C., Allen D. and Bildstein, K. L. (2004)
Autumn 2003 raptor migration at Chumphon, Thailand: a
globally significant raptor migration watch site. Forktail 20:
49-54.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (1994) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 2. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Kerlinger, P. (1989) Flight strategies of migrating hawks. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
MacKinnon, J. and Philipps, K. (1993) A field guide to the birds of
Borneo, Sumatra, Java and Bali. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University
Press.
Mason, V. N. (1994) Raptors en route. Tjerutjuk, Bull. Bali Bird Club
2(3): 6.
Mason, V. N. (1995) Teluk Terima, Bali, Indonesia. Unpublished
report to Hawks Aloft Worldwide.
McClure, H. E. (1998) Migration and survival of the birds of Asia.
Bangkok: White Lotus Press.
Nijman, V. (2001a) Autumn migration of raptors on Java', Indonesia:
composition, direction and behaviour. Ibis 143: 99-106.
Nijman, V. (2001b) Spatial and temporal variation in migrant raptors
on Java, Indonesia. Emu 101: 259-263.
Nijman, V. (2003) The status of three northern migrant raptors rarely
observed on Java. Kukila 12: 59-65.
Nijman, V. (in press) Magnitude and timing of migrant raptors in
central Java, Indonesia. Ardea.
Nijman, V., Germi, F. and van Balen, S. (in prep.) Status of migrant
sparrowhawks on Java and Bali, Indonesia.
Smith, N. G. (1980) Hawk and vulture migration in the Neotropics.
Pp. 50-61 in A. Keast and E. S. Morton, eds. Migrant birds in the
Neotropics: ecology, behaviour, distribution and conservation.
Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Inst. Press.
Smith, N. G. (1985) Dynamics of the transisthmian migration of
raptors between Central and South America. Pp. 271-290 in I.
Newton, and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Conservation studies on
raptors. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird
Preservation. (ICBP Technical Publication No. 5).
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Vol. 1, Non-
Passerines. London: Academic Press.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The Birds of Wallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sundas Islands, Indonesia): an
annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list 7).
Whitten, A. J., Soeriaatmadja, R. E. and Afiff, S. A. (1996) The
ecology of Java and Bali. Singapore: Periplus Editions.
Zalles, J. I. and Bildstein, K. L. (2000) Raptor watch: a global directory
of raptor migration sites. Cambridge, U.K. and Kempton, U.S.A.:
BirdLife International and Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Francesco Germi, 46 (2F2) Elm Row, Edinburgh EH7 4AH, Scotland, U.K. Email: francesco@germi.freeserve.co.uk
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 99-1 20
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from
Taiwan, 1977-2003
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Since the late 1970s, many masters’ theses in Taiwan
have investigated aspects of the island’s avifauna,
including a substantial number of studies on the
endemic species. This paper presents abstracts of these
studies, in some cases condensed from the originals, to
bring this important body of data to international
attention. In recent years, all Taiwanese masters’ theses
have been required to have Chinese and English bilin¬
gual abstracts, but this was not the case for those
published before 1993. Thus, nine of the early theses
have only Chinese abstracts, and I have translated
these into English (as indicated after the title). Editing
has been largely confined to clarity of expression rather
than change of content. Taxonomy and nomenclature
follow Inskipp et al. (1996) except for usage in thesis
titles, where the researcher’s original usage is also given
(with Inskipp et a/.’s nomenclature inserted in square
brackets). This is to facilitate readers in tracing the
thesis. The full theses are mostly in traditional Chinese,
except for numbers 3, 7, 10 and 23, which are in
English. Readers wishing to consult the full theses
should contact the institutions directly. Some are also
held in the National Central Library, Taipei, Taiwan
(http://www2.ncl.edu.tw/).
Table 1 shows that more than half of the theses
(57%) focused on single species. Among subjects,
breeding behaviour and ecology accounted for almost
half of the theses (48%), foraging behaviour and
ecology accounted for 25% and community structure
accounted for 16%. Many theses addressed more than
one of the subjects listed in Table 1 .
THESIS ABSTRACTS
1 . Jai Peng (1977) A study of ecological isolation of
birds in Taiwan. Department of Biology, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Adviser: Lin Jun-Yi.
Ecological isolating mechanisms of 130 species of
landbird breeding in Taiwan are described. Factors
such as geography, altitude, horizontal and vertical
habitat, foraging behaviour, body size, bill morphology
and diet were analysed. Within each avian community,
‘guilds’ were defined to show functional structure.
Only two species, Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus
sinensis and Styan’s Bulbul P. taivanus , appeared to be
completely geographically isolated. Altitudinal ranges
varied according to local distributions; generally,
species occupied specific ranges, especially during the
breeding season. Most species did not show clear
directional or seasonal migration along altitudinal
gradients. Altitudinal ranges averaged 1,333 m, which
is larger than in other similar studies. The greatest
changes in avifauna occurred at around 1,000 m and
2,300 m. For practical purposes, three altitudinal
zones of bird distribution were distinguished: low
altitude (<1,000 m); intermediate altitude
(1,000-2,300 m); and high altitude (>2,300 m). Bird
species diversity increased from sea-level, reached its
peak (66 species) at 1,200-1,500 m, and then
decreased to five species at high altitudes. The relative
paucity of the forest avifauna at low altitudes was
attributed to human disturbance of habitats and histor¬
ical factors during colonisation of Taiwan by people in
Table 1. Subject matter of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan (N=67), 1977-2003.
100
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
the 18th century. In forest, the proportion of species
occupying the ground layer was greatest at low
altitudes, whereas the proportion of species occupying
the shrub layer increased with altitude. Species
occupying the forest understorey were reduced or
absent in pure coniferous forest. The proportion of
canopy species decreased with altitude. Foliage-
gleaning and ground-foraging were the two most
common foraging behaviours. Low altitudes, especially
those near sea-level, supported more species of aerial
foragers. Hover-gleaning species disappeared abruptly
at c. 2,400 m. Birds of prey were absent above 2,700 m.
Only one species of bark-feeder occurred at low
altitudes. The proportion of small-bodied (4-9 cm)
species increased with altitude, whereas that of inter¬
mediate (9.5-17 cm) species decreased. No clear trend
was observed for large-bodied (17.5-38 cm) species.
Species with body sizes of 4-6 cm appeared to occur
most frequently above 2,100 m. Within each altitudinal
range, food resources were generally exploited
uniformly, except in the case of vertebrates and larger
invertebrates.
2. Hsu Jy-Minna (1984) A biological study of
Styan’s Bulbul Pycnonotus taivanus and Chinese
[=Light-vented] Bulbul P. sinensis forniosae.
Department of Zoology, National Taiwan University,
Taipei. Adviser: LinYao-Sung; [translated by WHF].
Between September 1982 and August 1983, an
860-hour field study of Styan’s Bulbul Pycnonotus
taivanus and Light-vented Bulbul P. sinensis was
conducted in Renting and Taipei (botanic garden, zoo,
youth park and NTU campus). In 1983, specimens of
both species were purchased from Pingtung for
external measurement and inspection of the sexual
organs in order to compare their appearance, breeding
biology and ecology. In total, 222 Light-vented
Bulbuls, 176 Styan’s Bulbuls and 15 ‘intermediate
morphs’ were obtained. The adultrjuvenile and
male:female ratios amongst the specimens were similar
for both species. Males were larger than females, and
Styan’s Bulbul was larger than Light-vented Bulbul.
Intra-specific size differences between the sexes were
greater than inter-specific size differences between
individuals of the same sex. The plumage and size of
the ‘intermediate’ specimens were between those of the
two species, and their geographical distribution was
from the area of overlap between the two species’
ranges. Hence, they possibly represented hybrids of the
two species. The daily activity patterns of Styan’s and
Light-vented Bulbuls were influenced by both time
and season. Birds were generally active in the early
morning and late afternoon. During breeding season,
Styan’s Bulbuls remained active throughout the day,
although this was apparently not the case for Light-
vented Bulbul. Both species occurred in pairs
throughout the year, although during the non-breeding
season they could be found in flocks. In both species,
threatening behaviour included supplanting, chases,
alert and ‘head forward’ postures, which were all used
in the establishment and defence of territories. Wing¬
lifting, song and aerial displays were used during
territory advertisement, and, combined with chasing,
‘head forward’ and pre-copulatory display, attracted
females for mating. The breeding season of Styan’s
Bulbul was from late March to early July, the peak
being during April. Light-vented Bulbul bred later,
with the peak in May. In both species, nest construc¬
tion and incubation were carried out entirely by the
female. Males guarded and defended the territory.
Nestlings were fed by both parents. Females of both
species laid at 24-hour intervals, and incubation began
when the last egg was laid. The incubation period was
11-12 days. Nestlings required frequent brooding. The
fledging period was 9-10 days. In Styan’s Bulbul,
average clutch-size was 3.3 eggs and hatching success
was 60%; the average number of nestlings per nest was
2.7. In Light-vented Bulbul, average clutch-size was
2.9 eggs and hatching success was 65%; the average
number of nestlings per nest was 2.6. Both species
frequently had two broods. Styan’s Bulbul was very
selective with respect to nest-site: of 84 nests found in
Renting, 75% were in Calophyllum inophyllum,
although the latter comprised just 34% of the trees
locally.
3. Lin Lu-Shih (1985) The breeding ecology of two
wren warblers [=prinias]: [Plain Prinia] Prinia
subflava formosae {—Prinia inornata ] and
[Yellow-bellied Prinia] P. flaviventris sonitans in
central Taiwan. Department of Biology, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Adviser: Paul S. Alexander.
Populations of Plain Prinia Prinia inornata and
Yellow-bellied Prinia P flaviventris were studied
between January 1984 and May 1985 in an area of
c.2 km2 covering parts of the Tunghai University
campus and adjacent Taichung Industrial Zone. The
breeding activity of 68 pairs of Plain Prinia and 27
pairs ofYellow-bellied Prinia was studied between April
and September 1984. Most Plain Prinia breeding
activity occurred between April and August, whereas
breeding by Yellow-bellied Prinia occurred mainly
between May and July. Habitats used by Yellow-bellied
Prinia had denser vegetation than those used by Plain
Prinia. Nesting sites of both species occurred princi¬
pally in Panicum maximum , but also in Miscanthus
floridulus. The height of nests in these two grass species
was greater on average for Plain Prinia than Yellow-
bellied Prinia. Average clutch-size in Plain Prinia (4.35
eggs) was higher than in Yellow-bellied Prinia (3.87
eggs). Egg size was slightly smaller in Plain Prinia. In
both species, egg weight was correlated with laying
order. Hatching and fledging success were higher in
Yellow-bellied Prinia than in Plain Prinia, but a greater
number of clutches in Plain Prinia compensated for the
lower productivity per clutch. These data suggest that
the two species of prinia maintain their population
levels by different adaptations.
4. Li Pei-Yi (1986) The natural history of Black-
naped Blue Flycatcher [=Black-naped Monarch]
and why it joins mixed-species flocks. Department
of Biology, Tunghai University, Taipei. Adviser: Lucia
Liu Severinghaus; [translated by WHF].
This study was on the behaviour of Black-naped
Monarch Hypothymis azurea, the benefit individuals
gain from joining mixed-species flocks, and how
mixed-species feeding flocks form. Between June 1984
and April 1986, the behaviour of Black-naped
Monarch was studied at Tunghai University campus,
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
101
Taichung. Foraging efficiency and incidences of preda¬
tion were studied, both when feeding in flocks with
Vinous-throated Parrotbill Paradoxornis webbianus or
Japanese White-eye Zosterops japonicus, and when
feeding alone. The species preferred Acacia confusa
woodland with low human disturbance. Black-naped
Monarchs were monogamous, with the pair-bond
lasting year-round. Both sexes defended the territory.
They fed on insects captured by flycatching. The
breeding season was from late April to late July, with
one or two broods per year. The average clutch-size
was three eggs, and the incubation period was 14 days.
The fledging period was 10 days, although fledglings
stayed with the parents for 40-60 days before
becoming independent. Both sexes shared the incuba¬
tion, brooding and provisioning of chicks, although
females did a greater share of chick provisioning. Males
carried out nest-site defence duties. The species usually
joined mixed-species flocks during the non-breeding
season, most commonly during January. Although
individuals fed in the canopy when alone and when
joining Japanese White-eye flocks, Black-naped
Monarchs foraged in lower bushes when they joined
Vinous-throated Parrotbill flocks. Foraging efficiency
was higher when in mixed-species flocks: although
individuals did not obtain more food, they saved
energy when capturing prey. The benefits of joining
mixed-species flocks varied according to the
constituent species. Foraging efficiency increased when
birds joined parrotbill flocks, whereas there was no
significant difference when birds joined white-eye
flocks. The incidence of predation was lowest in parrot¬
bill flocks, second lowest in white-eye flocks, and
highest when alone.
5. Yuan Hsiao-Wei (1986) A behavioural and
ecological study of Lesser [=Oriental] Skylark
Alauda gulgula at Renting Pasture. Department of
Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser:
LinYao-Sung; [translated by WHF],
Between April 1985 and March 1986, a 750-hour
field study of Oriental Skylark Alauda gulgula was
conducted in the pasture and surrounding hills of
Renting National Park, Pingtung county. The lark
population was dependent on the vegetation status of
the habitat. During August-September, before the
pangola grass Digitaria decumbens had been harvested,
and when average grass height was >80 cm, the larks
moved to nearby grassland with shorter grass. Areas
with livestock also contained higher numbers of larks.
Daily activity was affected by the seasons, and started
and ended within one hour of sunrise and sunset
respectively. Birds were most active in the period
between sunrise and lOhOO, with another peak of
activity shortly before sunset. In the breeding season,
birds maintained relatively high levels of activity
throughout the day. During the breeding season, a
higher proportion of birds was in pairs, whereas during
the non-breeding season, birds were mainly seen singly
or in flocks. Individual behaviour included resting,
alert, feeding, bathing and preening. Social interac¬
tions included agonistic behaviour such as
supplanting, chasing, posturing and fighting, as well as
singing from the ground and in flight. Alert, agonistic
and vocal behaviour changed in frequency through the
breeding season, which was from early March to late
June, with a peak in late April. Males began by estab¬
lishing territories and attracting females for mating.
Nest building and incubation were carried out exclu¬
sively by the female, while the male defended the
territory. Eggs were laid during the early morning, and
the average clutch size was 2.6 eggs. Eggs had an
average weight of 2.8 g and average dimensions of
21.6x16.3 mm. Egg size was negatively related to
clutch size, and varied significantly between nests.
Incubation began soon after the last egg was laid.
Females incubated eggs only when the temperature
was below 26UC or above 37°C; most of the time they
only turned the eggs. Long spells of incubation were
not observed. The incubation period was 12 days, and
the female brooded the nestlings for 3-4 days.
Provisioning of nestlings was shared by both parents.
Chicks fledged after 8-9 days, after which fledglings
were provisioned by the parents for another 15 days.
Hatching success averaged 59%, but was much higher
earlier in the breeding season (95% before May) than
later (8.3% after May). Fledging success averaged
68%; later nests were less successful owing to preda¬
tion, and heavy rains after May. The growth curves of
chick weight and tarsus length showed a close fit to
logarithmic relationships. Growth of the tarsus
(Kl=0.59) was faster than increases in weight
(Kw=0.35). At 15 days old, fledglings were relatively
capable of flight.
6. ChuYueh-Li (1987) A behavioural and ecologi¬
cal study of egrets. Department of Biology, National
Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. Adviser: Wang Ying;
[translated by WHF] .
Of the six species of egret occurring in Taiwan, only
four are common. These include two winter visitors
(Great Egret Casmerodius albus and Intermediate Egret
Mesophoyx intermedia ) and two resident species (Little
Egret Egretta garzetta and Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis).
Feeding behaviour of these species was studied
between September 1985 and March 1986 at Nan-Jen
Mountain in Renting National Park. A positive corre¬
lation was found between the number of cattle and the
number of Cattle Egrets following them (r=0.4,
P<0.05). The percentage of egrets foraging with
grazing cattle increased as the ratio of Cattle
Egrets/cattle increased. It appeared that egrets
preferred to follow cattle when the cattle were grazing
since 97% of grazing cattle were accompanied by
egrets while only 5 1 % of cattle without attendant
egrets were grazing. There was no significant difference
in feeding frequency between egrets following and not
following cattle. However, the time distribution of
feeding, watching, preening, and bathing between
these two groups was very different. In winter, Little
Egrets defended their feeding territories in streams
from intruders. After chasing, the owner’s behaviour
was affected by the presence of the intruder. When the
owner of a neighbouring territory was in sight, the
incidence of intrusion was lowered. Neighbouring
territorial egrets helped to drive intruders away. After a
chasing incident, if the intruder entered a neighbour¬
ing territory when the neighbour was out of sight, the
first territory owner increased its activity in the neigh¬
bouring territory. Little Egrets were most active in the
102
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
centre of territories. The frequency of chasing incidents
was correlated significantly with the use of the territory
boundary by the owner (r=0.7, P<0.05). Little Egret
foraging techniques varied with habitat and food
abundance, and hence indirectly affected the time
spent in different habitats. The frequency of feeding
attempts by young birds (3.0 attempts/min) was higher
than for adults (1.4 attempts/min), but the success
rates showed no difference. The frequency of feeding
attempts was higher for territory owners (3.7
attempts/min) than intruders (2.5 attempts/min) (t-
test, P< 0.05), however, catching rate for owners (90%)
was significantly lower than for intruders (99.6%; t-
test, P<0. 05). Little Egrets showed three major
foraging techniques: walking, standing, and flycatch-
ing. Feeding frequency when walking was highest in
the breeding season (3.4 attempts/min) and much
lower in winter (0.8 attempts/min). Feeding when
standing was rarest (0.06 attempts/min). Great and
Intermediate Egrets winter in Nan-Jen area. Their
feeding frequencies and movements showed significant
differences (t-test, P<0.05).The use of feeding areas by
Intermediate Egret fitted the feeding model by
Charnov (1976).
7. Chen Hui-Chuan (1987) The biology and
breeding behaviour of [Eurasian] Tree Sparrow
[Passer montanus ] in central Taiwan. Department
of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung. Advisers:
Paul S. Alexander and Lucia Liu Severinghaus.
This represents the first study of the biology and
breeding behaviour of Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer
montanus in Taiwan. Field observations were
conducted between January 1986 and May 1987. In
total, 565 bouts of male courtship display were
observed and a flow-chart for courtship behaviour was
constructed. Male courtship display peaked in late
March and decreased gradually through to May. Nests
were searched for during June-August in 1986 and
April-May in 1987. The number of new clutches
peaked at the end of June. Clutch size ranged from
three to five eggs; the mode was four. Mean hatching
success per nest (±1 standard deviation) was
0.75±0.23. Both sexes appeared to make equal contri¬
butions to nest-building and parental care. Most
individuals maintained monogamous pair-bonds, but
some males paired with two females and simultane¬
ously defended and cared for two nests. Additional
extra-pair courting was also observed.
8. Luo Liu-Chi (1987) A biological study of
[Steere’s Liocichla] Liocichla steerii at Chitou.
Department of Biology, National Taiwan Normal
University, Taipei. Adviser: Wang Ying; [translated by
WHF],
From March 1986 to April 1987, a biological study
of Steere’s Liocichla Liocichla steerii was conducted at
Chitou, Nantou county. Steere’s Liocichla frequented
the transition zone between two different vegetation
types. About 77% of plants used as perches were
bushes or undergrowth less than 4 m in height; 85% of
perching sites were less than 2 m above ground. Daily
activity peaks of the species coincided mainly with
dawn and sunset. Steere’s Liocichla is omnivorous,
with a very varied diet that includes fruits, berries,
insects, other invertebrates and a range of human-
made foods. In winter, when natural foods are scarce,
food left by tourists was a major food source. In cases
of severe food shortage, birds feed on the remains of
dead conspecifics. The calls of Steere’s Liocichla can
be separated into nine types: male territorial call,
female response call, two alarm calls, fighting call,
escape call, distress call, social call, and chick begging
call. Each call is distinctive and has a specific meaning.
The male territorial call and female response are both
sex-specific. The breeding season lasts almost five
months, from mid-March to mid-August, during
which birds sing, mostly in pairs, at dawn. The average
weight of adult birds during the breeding season was
significantly lower than in the non-breeding season.
Both the male and the female defended the breeding
territory. The average territory was 60x100 m in size,
and in the shape of an irregular polygon according to
the landscape. Nests were located to one side of the
territory, not in the centre. Nests were cup-shaped and
built by both sexes from bamboo leaves, bark, roots
and leaves, lined with fine grass and plant fibres. The
pair tended the nest for two days following the comple¬
tion of building before the female laid the first egg. The
average clutch size was 2.5 eggs. Eggs were generally
pale green, speckled with dark reddish spots. On
average, eggs measured 17.9x23.9 mm, and each
weighed c.13% of the female’s body weight. The
incubation period was 16 days, with both sexes
incubating by day, but only the female by night.
Nestlings were brooded for eight days, with both
parents sharing brooding, provisioning and nest¬
cleaning duties. Chick growth rate (body weight and
tarsus length) was nearly exponential. The fledging
period was 12 days, and the average weight of fledg¬
lings was 20.5 g (n=3), equating to c.68% of the female
weight. Average tarsus length at fledging was 28.5 mm,
which is about the same as that of adults. During the
non-breeding season, between September-March, the
species formed flocks. Flock size reached its peak
during January, the coldest month of the year. Pair¬
bonds lasted into the non-breeding season. Pairs joined
flocks (of varying sizes) and began daily activities an
hour after dawn. At the end of the day, flocks broke up
into pairs again two hours after sunset.
9. Chen Tsuei-Lan (1988) A biological study of
seabirds at Mao-Yu islets. Department of Biology,
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. Adviser:
Wang Ying; [translated by WHF],
The Mao-Yu islets lie south-west of the Penghu
archipelago. With steep inaccessible terrain and
abundant fish resources, the area has become one of
the last traditional breeding sites for a number of tern
species. However, owing to human disturbance,
seabird populations have declined in recent years. To
facilitate the future management of the area, a two-year
survey of the avifauna and a preliminary investigation
into the dependence of terns on local resources was
conducted. The preliminary survey recorded 43 species
of bird from 22 families, seven of which breed there:
Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii , Roseate Tern 5.
dougallii, Black-napedTern ,S’. sumatrana. Bridled Tern
A. anaethetus, Brown Noddy Anous stolidus, Pacific
Reef Egret Egretta sacra and Oriental Skylark Alauda
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
103
gulgula. Only Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis , Pacific
Reef Egret and Oriental Skylark were resident year-
round, with the rest of the species being migratory.
Rarer species that were also recorded included frigate-
birds Fregata sp., Streaked Shearwater Calonectris
leucomelas and Brown Booby Sula leucogaster. The most
abundant species were Brown Noddy and Bridled
Tern, which comprised more than 90% of individuals
recorded. The breeding season of these two species was
from March to September. The average body weight
(± 1 standard deviation) was 189±10.8 g (n=13) for
Brown Noddy, and 124±7.9 g (n=29) for Bridled Tern.
Half the individuals ringed had a brood-patch.
Preliminary estimates suggested that 7,000-20,000
terns were present at the peak of the breeding season.
A few terns were also found on nearby islets, but
numbers were less than 10% of those occurring at
Mao-Yu. Habitat use differed between the two species:
62-92% of Brown Noddy nests were among rock-piles,
whereas 52-84% of Bridled Tern nests were on grass.
The distribution of nests of both species was also
affected by the slope of the terrain: as many as 260
nests/ha were recorded on steep cliffs, whereas fewer
than 1 5 nests/ha occurred in flat areas. No species are
known to be predators on the islet; although rats were
seen, their impact on the tern colonies is not known.
Differences in foraging technique were noted among
four of the tern species. Diving was used most by
Roseate Tern (90%) and Black-naped Tern (88%).
Brown Noddy used four types of foraging technique,
with foot-paddling and contact-dipping the most
commonly used (90%). Bridled Tern employed five
techniques, amongst which contact-dipping was the
most frequent (70%). The area was also used heavily
by fishermen from nearby islets throughout the year:
interviews with them revealed that fish were abundant,
and that more than 20 species could be caught in the
area. Fishing occurred by day or night, depending on
the target species. Clams, crabs and seaweed were also
abundant at Mao-Yu, and were harvested year-round.
The collection of eggs was the most obvious threat to
the bird populations on the islets, but its impact was
not determined. Disturbance by the increasing number
of tourists visiting the islets is also a concern.
10. Li Shou-Hsien (1989) The breeding biology and
flocking in the non-breeding season of Japanese
White-eye Zosterops japonica [ =Z. japonicus ].
Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung.
Advisers: Paul S. Alexander and Lucia Liu
Severinghaus.
The breeding biology and flocking behaviour of
Japanese White-eye Zosterops japonicus were studied
from September 1987 to February 1989 in an area
covering c.50 ha on the campus of Tunghai University.
In 1988, the breeding season began from mid-April
and ended in mid-August. The average clutch size was
2.8 eggs. Incubation lasted 10-11 days and the young
fledged 10-11 days after hatching. Both parents shared
equally in feeding and brooding responsibilities. White-
eyes were monogamous, and pair bonds may be
maintained throughout the year. In the non-breeding
season, white-eyes formed large foraging flocks of
20-50 individuals. Flock size and composition
changed frequently throughout the day. Turnover rate
of birds in a 1.5 ha area was high. Of 94 birds ringed
in the 1.5 ha area between November 1987 and
February 1988, only eight were seen in this area one
month after ringing, and only seven were sighted about
one year later.
1 1. Chen Zhao-Jie (1989) The relationship between
breeding territory and stream habitat in Brown
Dipper Cinclus pallasii. Department of Biology,
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. Adviser:
Wang Ying.
From November 1987 to April 1989, Brown
Dippers Cinclus pallasii were studied in Taiwan. The
breeding season, in December-May, was earlier than
for most of the resident bird species. The early start of
breeding in this species appears to be an adaptation to
a food supply that is most abundant in winter and early
spring. For about 90% of observation time, dippers
foraged in riffles, which comprise 47% of the stream
systems in the area, suggesting that dippers prefer this
habitat type. Riffles were the most productive sites for
aquatic insects. Three types of foraging techniques —
submerge-wading, diving, and float-pecking — were
observed; submerge-wading was observed most
frequently in shallow riffles, and diving in deep riffles.
Dippers were found to be monogamous. Pairs estab¬
lished linear breeding-season territories along streams.
An average breeding territory was 1,045 m in length
(n=14) and territory size was strongly correlated with
food parameters. Nest-site availability was not a
limiting factor. Detailed analysis of the relationship
between territory size and stream habitat factors
showed that territory size was significantly correlated
with the percentage of slow, deep water. Altitude,
percentage of area comprising riffles, and total wet-
weight of aquatic insects were inversely correlated with
territory size. There were no apparent correlations
between territory size and other factors such as stream
flux, slope and water pH. In multiple regression
analysis, a model developed from the combination of
riffle area percentage and total aquatic insect weight
explained 74% of variance in territory size. The
percentage riffle area related to available feeding area
in the territory, while total wet-weight of aquatic
insects related to food supply. The combination of
these two factors related to the total food available in
each territory. Thus, territory size was closely related to
food availability.
12. Young Shuh-sen (1989) The comparative
biology of Sharp-tailed Munia [=White-rumped
Munia] and Spotted Munia | =Scaly-breasted
Munia], Department of Zoology, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Chiu Tai-sheng.
Life histories of White-rumped Munia Lonchura
striata and Scaly-breasted Munia L. punctulata were
studied at the Kan-tou River bank, Hsinchu county,
from January 1988 to January 1989. The research
investigated differences between their life histories, and
mechanisms favouring sympatry. There were several
similarities in natural history. Both species fed on
similar seed types year-round, and potentially affected
crop harvests. Nests of both species had an elliptical
shape with a tubular opening at the upper side hidden
with long grass stalks. The eggs were pure white, and
104
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
hatched after 12-13 days. The fledging period was c.18
days, and juveniles required about 100 days to gain
adult plumage. There were several differences between
the species. Scaly-breasted Munia was larger and bred
from May to November, whereas White-rumped
Munia bred from April to December. Scaly-breasted
Munia showed highest activity in October whereas
White-rumped Munia was most active in May, July,
and October. Hatching success was 65% for White-
rumped Munia but 36% for Scaly-breasted Munia. For
the nest lining, White-rumped Munia used dry
bamboo leaves, and Scaly-breasted Munia used green
plant matter. White-rumped Munia nests were more
widely spaced than those of Scaly-breasted Munia. The
logistic growth curve of body weight was:
W= 1 1 .47/1 +e031(t 7 42) for Scaly-breasted Munia and
W=8.21/l+e 0 38 (,"5 0e" for White-rumped Munia.
13. Chang Chiung-Wen (1990) Analysis of vocal
repertoire of the bulbuls [Light- vented Bulbul]
Pycnonotus sinensis fortnosae and [Taiwan
Bulbul] P. taivanus. Department of Zoology,
National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers: LinYao-
Sung and Lucia Liu Severinghaus; [translated by
WHF],
From March to August 1989, a total of 290 field-
hours studying Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis
and Taiwan Bulbul P. taivanus were conducted at
Renting and Taipei (NTU campus, botanic garden and
Academia Sinica). From August 1989 to April 1990,
the inter-species and intra-species differences in
maximum frequency, frequency range, duration, and
time interval of these two species’ calls were analysed
using a sonagram analyser (Kay 5500) to determine
the call types used by each species. In total, 420
minutes from 175 calls of Taiwan Bulbul and 360
minutes from 89 calls of Light-vented Bulbul were
recorded. Sounds were divided into four categories:
songs, calls, harsh notes and alarm calls. Each category
was subdivided into types: eight for song and harsh
notes, four for calls and alarms. In total, there were 356
kinds of vocalisation. Among these 356 sounds, the
songs were most varied, with 239 kinds; 57 specific to
Light-vented Bulbul, 144 specific to Taiwan Bulbul,
and 38 shared by both. Although they share some
common vocalisations, there were differences between
the species in the frequency with which they were
given. Twelve harsh sounds were specific to Light-
vented Bulbul, 14 to Taiwan Bulbul, and 40 were
shared. Three calls were specific to Light-vented
Bulbul, 21 to Taiwan Bulbul, and nine were shared.
Two alarm calls were specific to Light-vented Bulbul,
ten to Taiwan Bulbul, and six were shared. Both species
gave shared harsh notes, calls, and alarms similarly
frequently. Songs, calls, and harsh notes did not differ
significantly between species in maximum frequency or
frequency range, although they did in duration and
time interval. Alarm calls of Light-vented Bulbul and
Taiwan Bulbul differed significantly in all characters:
maximum frequency, frequency range, duration and
time interval. Statistical analysis of basic phrases
showed that Light-vented Bulbul had significantly
lower intra-specific variation in sound characters.
While Taiwan Bulbul tended to add notes before or
after its basic phrase, Light-vented Bulbul did not. In
summary, the major differences between sounds of
Light-vented Bulbul and Taiwan Bulbul were in song
notes, and there was much less difference in basic
sound characters.
14. Liu Wan-Chun (1990) Polygyny in the Pale¬
headed Fan-tailed Warbler [=Bright-headed
Cisticola Cisticola exilis ] of central Taiwan.
Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung.
Advisers: Paul S. Alexander and Lucia Liu
Severinghaus.
The mating system of the Bright-headed Cisticola
Cisticola exilis was studied in shrub-grassland on Tatu
mountain (180 m) in Taichung county. During
ApriLSeptember in 1989 and 1990, 14 male territories
were observed regularly for breeding activities. Most
males were bigamous, some were trigamous and others
showed successive monogamy with up to four mates
per male during the breeding season. Territorial behav¬
iour (up to 25 minutes per hour) and the absence of
paternal care by males were documented. It was not
possible to draw conclusions about the factors influ¬
encing female mate choice. Harem size did not
correlate significantly with territory size or male calling
frequency. Brooding females regularly foraged outside
the territory, suggesting that within-territory food
abundance may not influence female choice. All nests
were built on shrubs and herbs in dense vegetation,
and suitable nesting sites may be a major factor in a
female’s mate choice. The breeding season began in
early April and the last fledging occurred in mid-
September. Clutch size was 3-5 eggs and tended to
decrease later in the breeding season. The incubation
period was 15-17 days, and the brooding period was
11-13 days.
15. Tu Ming-Lin (1991) Nest site selection and
hatching success of Kentish Plover Charadrius
alexandrinus on Changhua coast, Taiwan.
Department of Environmental Science, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Advisers: Chen Peter Ping-
Huang and Wang Chung-Kuei.
From March 1990 to July 1991, nest site selection
and hatching success of Kentish Plover Charadrius
alexandrinus were studied at Hsien-His, Lun-wei, and
Lu-Kang, along the coast of Changhua county, Taiwan.
A total of 167 nests with eggs were recorded during
this period. Compared with randomly selected points,
Kentish Plover nests were closer to water, roadside,
and nests of conspecifics. Hatching success was much
higher at Hsien-Hsi (65-68%) than in the two other
areas (35-42%). Nests failed through human destruc¬
tion, nest abandonment and inclement weather. In
Lu-Kang, higher hatching success was correlated with
greater distance from other nests, proximity to water,
and proximity to roads. In Lun-Wei, hatching success
was significantly correlated with vegetation cover
surrounding the nest.
16. Liu Liang-Li (1991) Biological study of
[Collared Bush Robin] Tarsiger johnstoniae.
Department of Biology, National Taiwan Normal
University, Taipei. Adviser: Wang Ying; [translated by
WHF],
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
105
From April 1990 to March 1991, the biology of
Collared Bush Robin Tarsiger johnstoniae was studied at
New Central-Cross Highway and Yu-Shan Forestry
Road in the range of Yu-Shan National Park. The
study included ringing, breeding observations, popula¬
tion estimation and nest site measurement. In all
measurements, males (n=10) were larger than females
(n=7), except that females had longer bills than males.
Ringed males stayed in fixed territories during the
breeding season, and were monogamous. The breeding
season was from late March to mid-August. Nests were
cup-shaped structures of moss, grass roots, dead
leaves, and nylon fibres, usually placed in a hole on a
slope; they were built solely by females. Females
incubated, and the incubation period was 14 days
(n=2). Both parents shared feeding, nest cleaning and
guarding. The fledging period was 18 days (n=2);
fledgling wing and tail length reached only 72% and
53%, respectively, of that of adults. There were no
differences between provisioning rates and food sizes
provided by male and female parents. Most food items
were animals (98%). The daily activity of Collared
Bush Robin coincided with local daybreak and sunset
times. Birds were most active between 07h00 and
08h00, with 6.75 sightings/day on average; by contrast,
only 0.75 sightings/day were made at the lowest activity
period, between 16h00 and 17h00. Sightings of
individuals and pairs were significantly higher in the
breeding season than at other times of year. Calls of
females showed no seasonal differences. Males gave
significantly more alarm calls in the breeding season,
but other types of call showed no seasonal differences.
The roadside slope was divided into seven types.
Bamboo-soil slope was the most frequent nesting area
(n=5), and all other types were used in proportion to
area. The major factor affecting breeding success was
the distance from nest to road surface. This might have
been because of predation and/or disturbance effects.
17. Chung Yu (1992) Ecological study of Chinese
Bamboo Partridge Batnbusicola thoracica.
Department of Biology, National Taiwan Normal
University, Taipei. Adviser: Wang Ying; [translated by
WHF],
From March 1991 to June 1992, Chinese Bamboo
Partridges Bambusicola thoracica were studied at
Renting National Park, Pintung county, Taiwan, to
investigate vocalisations, roosting behaviour, foraging
range, external characters and breeding biology. Sixty
birds were caught (in 73 captures), including 30 males
(39 captures) and 30 females (34 captures). Capture
efficiency in open environments (1.2 captures per 100
days) was higher than that in closed environments (0.8
captures per 100 days). Calling peaked in the morning
and in March. In total, 349 calls were recorded. Calls
of males and females differ. Female calls followed
males’ most of the time. Pair duets were most frequent
in March, and male solos were most frequent in early
June. Radio-telemetry was used to investigate roosting
behaviour. Birds roosted in trees, with no fixed sites.
Roost sites were usually in dense foliage <3 m high.
Individuals in a roosting group pressed together. Eight
birds were tracked; the mean foraging area (±1
standard error) was 7,90914,011 m2, with significant
individual variation. There was no significant sexual
dimorphism in external appearance, but all measure¬
ments for males significantly exceeded those for
females, except for the lengths of the central toe and
lower mandible. Partridges nested on well-drained
slopes. Both sexes developed brood-patches. Young
grew very fast; by 80 days, their plumage was almost
indistinguishable from that of adults, and their tarsus
length reached more than 90% of that of mature birds.
18. Ding Tzung-Su (1993) Avian community
ecology of mature forests in Mt Yushan.
Department of Zoology, National Taiwan University,
Taipei. Advisers: LinYao-Sung and Lee Pei-Fen.
I studied avian communities of mature primary
forests in Mount Yushan along 1,400-3,700 m altitudi¬
nal gradients between January and October 1992. Fifty
sample stations were selected along Shalishian valley
and Nantzshian valley, located at western ridge of
Mount Yushan. Breeding bird densities were recorded
with a circular-plot method, and 30 habitat variables
were measured at each sample station. The foci of this
study were: (1) the composition and parameters of
avian communities among these vegetation zones; (2)
the classification and distribution of avian guilds; (3)
altitudinal distribution and its processes, and habitat
selection of bird species. Population densities of 59
bird species were collected. Six bird communities were
discerned by cluster analysis based on bird densities
observed at each sample station. This classification
reflected vegetation types, with the broadleaf forests
split into higher (>2,000 m) and lower (<2,000 m)
types, and bird communities of hemlock Tsuga chinen-
sis and fir Abies kawakamii forests not distinguishable.
Broadleaf forests, mixed forests and spruce Picea
morrisonicola forests had higher total bird density and
diversity; the latter declined with increasing elevation.
Hemlock and fir forests showed the highest similarity
(80% of species shared), while broadleaf forest and
juniper Juniperus squamata shrubs showed the lowest
(no overlap). Similarity between forests declined with
increasing altitudinal separation. Species’ distributions
are limited by (1) altitude, (2) ecotone, and (3)
competitive exclusion. Of the 59 bird species, 27%
seemed to be limited by altitude, 32% by a combina¬
tion of altitude with ecotone, 25% by ecotone, 9% by
obvious competitive exclusion, and 7% by uncertain
factors.
19. Lin Ming-Zhi (1994) The relations between
landscape changes and avian communities in
Guandu, Taiwan. Advisers: Lee Pei-Fen and Chen
Qing-Xia.
I studied the relations between landscape changes
and avian communities in Guandu from 1979 to 1993,
using remote sensing and a geographic information
system. Habitat types used by each bird species were
recorded from November 1992 to December 1993 to
allow landscape types to be linked to avian guilds in the
study area. There had been two distinct landscape
changes. The area of mangrove had increased in the
south, while the area of human disturbance had
increased in the north. Landscape structure indices
showed that landscape diversity and evenness
increased, but that landscape dominance decreased.
The area of building land, soil-dumping land, mixed
106
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
grassland and mangroves increased, but the area of
paddyfields, ponds, Cyperus malaccensis and mudflats
decreased. During the study period, the area of paddy-
field was the highest, mangrove land increased from
0.17 ha to 17.3 ha, and land with C. malaccensis disap¬
peared. Avian species richness showed a bimodal
annual distribution, with the highest peaks in April and
November. The species richness of migrants decreased
between 1979 and 1993, but that of residents did not.
Changes from year to year of the avian species richness
were determined by the occurrence of migrants,
especially through the significant decrease shown by
both the spring and autumn migration peaks during
the 16-year period. Seven avian guilds were clustered
by habitat selection data. The annual species richness
of the shoreline, mudflat and shore-high-grass guilds
decreased, reflecting declining areas of these habitats.
The annual species richness of the woodland, grass¬
land and shoreline guilds showed only small changes,
as did the areas of these habitats, except that the area
of woodland increased. Landscape changes were the
main cause of avian community changes. Habitat
quality and quantity for migrants declined through
human disturbance and natural succession. The
management of waterfowl and their wetland environ¬
ment is an urgent need.
20. Sheu Sheau-Hwa (1994) Effect of egret flocking
on the plants and soil of egretries. Department of
Botany, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung.
Advisers: Chen Ming-Yih and Lin Jau-Yuan.
In Taiwan, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Cattle Egret
Bubulcus ibis and Black-crowned Night Heron
Nycticorax nycticorax nest together at certain egretries
(heronries). The effects of egret crowding on the plants
and soils below egretries were studied. Egretries
usually have dense forests and good feeding environ¬
ments. Dominant trees differ between egretries, and
include Casuarina equisetifolia, Broussonetia papyrifera,
Melia azedarach, bamboos and mangroves. Some
egretries have moved to coastal areas, reflecting inten¬
sive land use and increasing disturbance inland, and
rapid expansion of fish ponds in coastal areas. Egretries
in coastal areas are mainly in Casuarina and mangrove
stands. Recently, a few more egretries also have been
established in southern Taiwan. Accumulating faeces
produce soils below egretries that have low pH values
and are extremely rich in available phosphorus and
organic matter. Plants less susceptible to contamina¬
tion by faeces, such as C. equisetifolia, Ficus microcarpa,
Avicennia marina and Kandelia candel, have a smooth
epidermis (so that faeces are easily detached from the
leaf) and protected stomata on the epidermis of the
underside of the leaf. More susceptible plants, includ¬
ing Broussonetia papyrifera, Achyranthes aspera and
Lantana camara, usually wither when coated by faeces
because the stomata on both the upper and lower
epidermis are not well protected and so are easily
blocked. This retards leaf physiological processes.
21. Chen Te-Kang (1994) Resource partitioning of
avian communities in Hsitou. Department of
Biology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Adviser: Lue Kong- Yang.
We used multivariate analysis to study resource
partitioning of avian communities in Hsitou from
September 1992 to April 1994. A 6.7-km loop was set
along virgin broadleaf forest and coniferous planta¬
tions, and various time and space parameters of the
community were measured. In total, 89 species of
woodland bird were recorded, of which 30 were
common enough for detailed analysis. Of these, 26 are
resident all year in the study area. There were more
bird species, contacts and guilds in virgin broadleaf
forest than in coniferous plantations. Cluster analysis
divided the 30 species into eleven guilds. Most
congeners belonged to different guilds, except for two
woodpeckers. DCA (detrended correspondence
analysis) and cluster analysis showed that bird species
within a guild were partitioned by vegetation type,
perch site, vertical stratification and foraging style, and
between guilds were partitioned by biome, vegetation
type, perch height, foraging behaviour and food type
(bill size). There was little evidence that interspecific
competition resulted in resource partitioning. Niche
breadth of most of bird species changed with season.
22. Tsai Chia-Yang (1994) Seasonal and spatial
variations of abundance of the Dunlin in relation
to their main prey (Crustacea: Amphipoda) at
Tatu estuary, Taiwan. Department of Environmental
Science, Tunghai University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen
Peter Ping-Huang.
Dunlin Calidris alpina is one of the commonest
shorebirds on the western Taiwan coast. This study
aimed to understand the mechanisms regulating its
distribution and abundance in the southern part of the
Tatu estuary, Changhwa county, by analysing its
feeding ecology. Exclosure experiments from March
1993 to March 1994 estimated the effects of Dunlin
feeding on amphipod density. In March-April 1993
and February-March 1994, when amphipods were
most abundant, Dunlin feeding rate ranged from 3,800
to 8,000 individual amphipods per hour at different
feeding sites. There was a positive linear relationship
(r=0.82) between the spatial distribution of Dunlins
and amphipods: more abundant amphipods attracted
more foraging Dunlins. The abundance of Dunlins and
amphipods is also positively correlated temporally
(r2=0.90).
23. Lin Hsing-Yu (1995) Seed dispersal of mistle¬
toes by flowerpeckers at Lien-Hua-Chih area,
Nan-tou county. Department of Biology, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Advisers: Paul S. Alexander and
Chiu Shau-Ting.
From March 1994 to April 1995, seed dispersal of
mistletoes Scurrula spp. by flowerpeckers Dicaeum spp.
was studied in the oil camellia Camellia oleifera planta¬
tion at Lien-Hua-Chih (23°55'N 120°52'E). Over 95%
of camellia plants were parasitised by the mistletoe Y.
rhododendricolus, which began flowering in March,
peaked in May and ended in October. Fruiting began
in April and ended in November. Plain Flowerpecker
Dicaeum concolor appeared in the plantation from
March to November, with an estimated population of
30-45 birds from late April to mid-August. Juveniles
appeared in June, when ripe fruits were plentiful, and
increased through July. Thus, breeding was synchro-
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
107
nised with mistletoe flowering and fruiting times. Fire¬
breasted Flowerpecker D. ignipectus appeared in small
numbers (c.15) in the plantation in mid-July,
decreased to six in early August, and further declined
until none was found in mid-September.
Flowerpeckers fed on mistletoe nectar and fruit. They
dispersed mistletoe seeds. Birds defecated seeds as they
perched on mistletoe (87% of observed defecations for
both species) or oil camellia branches (12% for Plain
Flowerpecker, 13% for Fire-breasted Flowerpecker)
and pressed the strings of viscous seeds to the branch.
Faeces of the two species of flowerpeckers could not be
distinguished. Ten seeds germinated on uninfected oil
camellia branches (1. 6-8.1 mm diameter) and were
successfully established with at least one shoot in
approximately six months. This represented only 1.8%
of an estimated 547 seeds dispersed by flowerpeckers
and monitored from August 1994 to April 1995. The
larger population size and greater efficiency in fruit
foraging of Plain Flowerpecker makes it more effective
in seed dispersal in the plantation than Fire-breasted
Flowerpecker.
24. Chen Rong-Tzou (1995) Research on asynchro¬
nous hatching in Little Egret. Department of
Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University,
Kaohsiung. Adviser: Chang Hsueh-Wen.
Hatching asynchrony, sibling competition and
brood reduction of the Little Egret Egretta garzetta
were investigated in the Linyun heronry in 1993 and
1994. Egg-laying intervals averaged 39 hours, and egg¬
hatching intervals averaged 28 hours. These intervals
increased with position in the hatching order, but egg
masses did not differ significantly with laying order.
Mean clutch size was 4.0 eggs in 1993 and 3.8 eggs in
1994. Hatching success was 92% of all eggs laid in
1993 and 94% in 1994. Growth and survival probabil¬
ity of nestlings related to their hatching order. During
days 0-18, size differences among siblings were clear.
Growth and survival rates of the first and the second
nestlings were similar, but higher than those of the
third and the fourth chicks. Nestling survival rates in
different-sized clutches differed significantly. Parents
came back to the nest 48 times per day, on average, to
feed the young. When two siblings competed for food,
the elder was more likely to be fed than the younger.
Some chicks were exchanged between nests to create
broods with no hatching interval (‘pseudo-
synchronous’ broods). Asynchronous broods had a
higher proportion of partial broods, but a lower
proportion of complete nest failures compared with
pseudo-synchronous broods. On these latter nests,
parents provisioned the young 66 times per day, a
higher rate than that for the asynchronous broods. The
pseudo-synchronous broods had a parental efficiency
33% lower than the asynchronous broods. The results
supported Lack’s hypothesis that asynchronous
hatching allows flexible, optimal brood size, correspon¬
ding to food availability. They also accord with
Hamilton’s hypothesis that asynchronous hatching
reduces competition between siblings.
25. Fang Cheng-Yi (1996) The bird community in
the Tatachia area pine forest three years after a
forest fire. Department of Forestry, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
From 6 January 1993, a six-day forest fire burned
90% of pine forests in the Tatachia area of Yushan
National Park (2,765-2,865 m). From March to July
1996, I compared the vegetation, bird densities and
arthropods in burned and unburned areas of pine
forest. Compared with unburned forest, burned areas
had decreased ground-layer cover but a greater
number of ground-layer plant species and more snags,
similar bird species but different bird guild densities,
and fewer arthropods (potential prey for birds). A total
of 27 bird species was observed, with 24 in unburned
forest, 21 in burned forest and 18 species common to
both. Fourteen species of birds were abundant enough
to estimate densities. All 14 used unburned forest,
where the total bird density was 10.8 birds/ha, but only
nine occurred in burned forest, which had a total bird
density of 6.8 birds/ha. Bird guilds in burned forest
had one fewer species of bush insectivore, and two
fewer of tree omnivore and of tree insectivore,
compared to the guilds in unburned forest. Densities
of bush insectivores, tree omnivores and tree insecti-
vores were lower in burned than in unburned forest,
although density of ground insectivores was greater in
burned forest. Species richness and biomass of arthro¬
pods were lower in burned forest than in unburned
forest, perhaps explaining the lower bird densities in
the burned forest.
26. Fang Yun-Ju (1996) The relationship between
forest structure and bird community: a case
study on the influence of the timber stand
improvement programme in a mid-elevation
area, northern Taiwan. Department of Forestry,
National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers: Su
Horng-Jye and Lucia Liu Severinghaus.
Selective logging and silviculture practices modify
forest structure. To understand their influences on bird
communities, and relationships between forest struc¬
ture and bird community, a mid-elevation area in
northern Taiwan was investigated. I compared forest
structure, bird community, and microhabitat use of
birds in a site nine years after selective logging and
replacement by cypress (presumed Chamaecyparis
formosensis ) plantation, with those in undisturbed
forest. Breeding bird density was censused in 23
sample stations by a variable circular plot method.
Microhabitats were investigated by recording each
active bird with respect to the plant life-form, forest
stratum, and perch position. Vegetation and habitat
structure were censused with twenty 5x5 m quadrats
in each sample station. Birds were divided into eight
guilds by diet, foraging behaviour and activity strata,
according to the information of previous studies and
data from my microhabitat investigation. A total of 1 10
tree species was recorded. In the logged forest there
were lower densities of small- to medium-sized trees,
and reduced coverage in the shrub to sub-canopy layer.
The coverage and height of the ground layer,
increased, as did the vertical heterogeneity. Tree
species diversity, total coverage, foliage height diversity,
and the horizontal heterogeneity of under-storey were
also reduced.
108
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
In total, 35 breeding bird species were recorded in
undisturbed forest, of which 27 were abundant enough
for density estimation. This species richness was
slightly higher than in the logged forest, where 32
species were found, with 25 of them common enough
for density estimation. However, the difference in
species composition was small. The total bird density
in undisturbed forest was higher than in logged forest,
but dominance was stronger in the former, thus
rendering its species diversity index lower than in the
latter. The number of species more abundant in the
undisturbed forest equalled the number more common
in the logged site, but the effect of logging differed
significantly between guilds. Ground-gleaning
omnivores, upper-storey gleaning insectivores, and
upper-storey hovering insectivores suffered more
impacts from logging. Conversely, understorey
gleaning insectivores, upper-storey trunk-probing
insectivores, and upper-storey gleaning omnivores
were more abundant in the logged site. These diverse
responses among guilds reflect differences in food
resource and foraging microhabitat. In the logged site,
microhabitat use of birds was significantly concen¬
trated in the dominant tree canopy and in the ground
layer. The range of vertical strata used was reduced.
The perch position of upper-storey birds tended to
shift towards the outside of crowns. Patterns of micro¬
habitat breadth followed those of density of each guild,
but average microhabitat overlap among species
showed a reverse pattern. The microhabitat breadth
was not related to the density difference between the
two sites, neither was the microhabitat shift. Detrended
correspondence analysis was used to analyse bird
species assemblages. The most important factor corre¬
sponding with bird community variation was the
habitat structure difference resulting from logging. The
second was altitude. Bird community variation among
sample stations was highly correlated with vegetation
and habitat structure differences. Most of the higher-
altitude species were more abundant in the
undisturbed site, and the diversity index along the
altitudinal gradient was higher there. The tree species
diversity index, foliage height diversity, total coverage,
and horizontal heterogeneity index were related to the
vegetation differences underlying variation in the bird
community, but all of them had low correlation with
both the number of bird species and total bird density.
27. Lin Ruey-Shing (1996) The breeding and flock
ecology of Grey-cheeked Fulvetta Alcippe
morrisonia. Department of Zoology, National
Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers: LinYao-Sung and
Chou Liea-Siang.
Grey-cheeked Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia is the
most abundant bird in Fushan forest. Its breeding and
flock ecology were studied in the Botanical Garden
from January 1994 to March 1995. The breeding
season ran from mid-April to mid-August, peaking in
May-June. The mating system may be monogamous.
Both parents shared nest-building, incubation,
brooding and feeding. However, the effort of females
and males varied between nests and stages. Nest¬
building usually took 3-4 days. The clutch size was 3-4
eggs per nest and each fresh egg averaged 2.3 g. The
incubation period was 12-14 days, and the young
fledged nine days after hatching. The young were fed
for 40-65 days after fledgling. Feeding frequency and
food-item size correlated positively with age of the
young. The commonest food types were Lepidoptera
and Hymenoptera larvae (79%). During the non¬
breeding season, fulvettas formed flocks. The size of
two monitored flocks peaked at 49 in August and 62 in
November. The smallest sizes (27 and 37) occurred
just before the breeding season. The natural mortality
of flock members was 34% per year, mainly due to cold
weather in January and February. Flock composition
stabilised after August or September. Flock home
ranges were 17.8-31.8 ha according to grid cells
counts. Flocks showed no preference for different
habitats within the home range. Home ranges of neigh¬
bouring flocks overlapped, with no obvious territory
defence. The extent of overlap differed between areas.
28. Chen Chao-Sheng (1996) Variation of
mitochondrial control-region sequences and
population phylogeny in Japanese White-eyes
Zosterops japonica \—Z. japonicus\. Department of
Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University,
Kaohsiung. Adviser: Chang Hsueh-Wen.
Japanese White-eye Zosterops japonicus is widespread
in South-East Asia, with two subspecies in Taiwan: Z.j.
simplex is common in mainland Taiwan and Z. j. batanis
occurs on Orchid Island and Green Island. The two
differ in bill width, body size and feather colour. Using
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), I amplified the
variable control region of the mitochondrial DNA and
sequenced different populations of Japanese White-eye
from mainland China, Kaohsiung, Nantou, Taitung,
Orchid Island and Green Island. The length of
mitochondrial DNA control region is about 1034 bp.
Based on the phylogenetic analysis (by PHYLIP) of the
central part of the control region, the China-Taiwan
populations and the Orchid-Green island populations
are distinct. Assuming an origin in South-East Asia, the
species might have spread from there to mainland
China and the Philippines.
29. Huang Li-Ming (1996) The relationships
between avian community structure and stream
corridor patterns along the Fa-Tse river in
Taichung city. Department of Environmental
Science, Tunghai University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen
Peter Ping-Huang.
Relationships between stream bird community
structure and stream corridor patterns were studied
along the Fa-Tse river in Taichung city. Avian species’
populations and stream corridor factors were surveyed
in nine plots from summer 1995 to spring 1996. Of 37
species of birds recorded, 20 were distinguished as
stream species, 13 as terrestrial species, and four as
aerial species. Four stream corridor factors correlated
with stream bird species richness and population
abundance. Corridor width showed a strong linear
relationship with both avian species richness and
abundance (P<0.001). The number of sand-bars
showed a significant relationship with both stream bird
population abundance (P<0. 001) and species richness
(P<0.01). The terrestrial bird abundance also showed
a significant relationship with stream corridor width
(P<0.01). Of the 20 stream bird species, Black-
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
109
crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax was the
most numerous species, more than twice as common
as Little Egret Egretta garzetta and four times as
abundant as Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus.
Individual bird species preferred different habitats, but
stream birds were concentrated in the centre of the
corridor transect.
30. Huang, Shian-Lin (1996) Power consumption of
flight at different speeds in Light-vented
[=Chinese] Bulbuls Pycnonotus sinensis
estimated from aerodynamics. Department of
Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers:
Chou Lien-Shiang and Sue Chin-Chia.
Flight speeds and kinematical parameters of three
Light-vented Bulbuls Pycnonotus sinensis were
recorded. Using these data and morphological param¬
eters, I estimated power consumption of these birds in
flight through aerodynamic theory. Wing-beat
frequency and amplitude did not differ with flight
speed or between individuals. Body inclination angle
decreased with increasing flight speed through a simple
linear relationship. Light-vented Bulbuls may vary
flight speed simply by changing their body inclination
angle. When flying slowly (almost hovering), the
induced power of the bird was about 80% of its
mechanical power requirements, and the profile and
parasite power were about 5%. In fast flight, induced
power was about 50% of mechanical power require¬
ments, with profile and parasite power about 30%.
Induced power generates lift, whereas profile and
parasite power overcomes drag. Hence, at slow flight
most power expenditure is to generate lift. At high
speed, only 50% of power expenditure generates lift,
whereas 28-30% overcomes drag. Inertial power was
15-17% of mechanical power at slow flight and
23-27% at fast flight. Inertial power should not be
ignored in calculations of power consumption of flight.
If the mechanical efficiency of flight muscle lies
between 0.08 and 0.23, flight metabolic rate could be
7.12-18.4 times basal metabolic rate (BMR) in slow
flight (effectively, hovering), and 4.57-11.08 times
BMR in fast flight.
31. Lu Cheng-rern (1997) A study of dynamics of
communities and population trends of shore-
birds, wildfowl and egrets at Tatu estuary.
Department of Environmental Science, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen Peter Ping-
Huang.
The Tatu estuary is a very important stopover site
for shorebirds migrating through mid-Taiwan. This
study is based on data from the Taiwan Wildbird
Information Service, collected in five sites in the Tatu
estuary from 1988 to 1996. Birds were divided into
four groups: waders, wildfowl, terns and egrets. I
analysed the community dynamics in each group every
year, and examined population indices for trends.
There were no obvious variations in the number of
species or community composition of the Tatu estuary
from 1988 to 1996. However, numbers of certain
species varied significantly. Egret numbers did not
change much, whilst all other species decreased except
Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola, Grey-tailed Tattler
Heteroscelus brevipes, Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria inter-
pres, Little Tern Sterna albifrons and Grey Heron Ardea
cinerea.
32. Chang Yen-Chyuan (1997) A study of spatio-
temporal distribution of Little Egret Egretta
garzetta and Black-crowned Night Heron
Nycticorax nycticorax in Fa-Tse creek, Taichung
city. Department of Environmental Science, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen Peter Ping-
Huang.
Little Egret Egretta garzetta and Black-crowned
Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax are the most
numerous wading bird species on Fa-Tse creek,
Taichung city. To understand the spatio-temporal
distribution of these two species, the bird populations,
habitat, environmental factors and the relative density
of the birds’ primary food source, fish, were surveyed
in seven sites along the creek from June 1996 to May
1997. The egret was more evenly distributed than the
night heron. During the study, the site of a heronry
shifted, but this did not influence relative abundance at
feeding sites. Little egrets used both shallow, slow-
moving currents and swift rapids, while night herons
used mostly slow-moving currents, specifically
between water depths of 5-15 cm. Night heron
abundance was correlated with relative density of fish.
Night herons can be seen locally 24 hours a day.
During the day there are significantly more night
herons in the creek in the breeding than in the non¬
breeding season. These two species tolerate noise, but
the night heron is more sensitive to sudden noise.
33. Chen Yun-ju (1997) Foraging ecology of the
White-backed Woodpecker Picoides leucotos
[=Dendrocopos leucotos] in the Quercus zone of
Da-Hsuen-shan mountain area, Taiwan.
Department of Forestry, National Taiwan University,
Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
I studied the foraging ecology of White-backed
Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in the Quercus zone of
Da-Hsuen-Shan mountain area, Taiwan, from October
1995 to November 1996. The study focused on
foraging habitat selection and intersexual and intersea-
sonal foraging resource partitioning. During 180
observations of foraging, birds used 25 tree species.
Foraging habitat showed characters of old-growth
forest, the woodpeckers preferring stands with more
partially dead trees. They preferred trees of the
Fagaceae, and/or that were partially dead, meso- or
mega-phanerophytes. Males foraged on trees 25-75
cm diameter at breast height (dbh), and those larger
than 100 cm dbh, more than did females; but they
foraged less on trees smaller than 25 cm dbh, and
75-100 cm dbh. In addition, males foraged on trunks
or branches greater than 10 cm diameter more than
females and less on trunks or branches smaller than 10
cm diameter. Males probed more than, and scaled less
than, females. Males used foraging resources more
evenly than did females. It is not known if these differ¬
ences reflect sexual dimorphism or intra-pair
dominance. During the breeding season, partially dead
trees and snags were used more, and live trees less,
than during the non-breeding season. During the
breeding season the foraging height increased, with
more observations above 15 m, and fewer below 15 m.
110
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
Finally, feeding woodpeckers scaled more, and probed
less, during the breeding season than at other times.
This probably reflects seasonal changes in food avail¬
ability or in endogenous physiological requirements of
the woodpeckers. Further studies are needed on this
species’s diet and foraging to understand the intersex-
ual and interseasonal resource partitioning observed
during this study.
34. Liao Chien-Yu (1997) The spatial distribution
and predictive model of Timaliinae
[=Garrulacinae + Sylviinae: Timaliini] in Taiwan.
Department of Zoology, National Taiwan University,
Taipei. Adviser: Lee Pei-Fen.
Understanding species’ distribution is important
for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.
Based on presence/absence distribution data and
environmental variables, spatial distribution models of
16 species of the former Timaliinae (= Garrulacinae +
Sylviinae: Timaliini, sensu Inskipp et al. 1996) in Taiwan
were established using logistic regression. Bird distri¬
bution data were compiled from literature published
between 1978 and 1995. A 2x2 km grid system was
used to record the bird distribution. Environmental
data were mapped in a geographic information system
(GIS). Environmental variables showed significant
differences between areas of presence and of absence
for certain species. The accuracy of prediction varied
from 71% to 92%. Based on predicted distribution
models, altitudinal distribution of birds, gap analysis of
existing reserves and simulation of global warming
were undertaken. The available literature data can
predict the distribution of ‘Timaliinae’ in Taiwan
through logistic regression, but more information on
birds and environmental variables would improve the
power of the distribution models. Spatial analysis using
GIS methods can provide valuable insight into overall
patterns of potential distribution of ‘Timaliinae’ and
the results can be applied in conservation policy.
35. Lin Lee-jane (1999) The relationships between
avian communities and environmental factors in
the urban parks of Kaohsiung city. Department of
Zoology, National Kaohsiung Normal University,
Kaohsiung. Advisers: Liang Shih-hsiung and Shieh
Bao-sen.
This study constructed a database of bird commu¬
nities of urban parks in Kaohsiung city, and
investigated relationships between their characteristics
and environmental factors. Twenty-five urban parks
were seasonally surveyed from April 1998 to March
1999. A circular-plot method was used to record bird
species and their abundance. Characteristics
estimated of bird communities included total species
richness, density, evenness and family richness index
(=(F-l)/lnN, where F = number of families in the
sample, and N = total number of individuals in the
sample). Environmental factors included the area and
age of a park, human activity level, noise intensity,
edge effect and vegetation diversity. Area had the most
important effect on bird species richness, diversity and
family richness indices, explaining 30-55% of their
variation. Species richness, diversity and family
richness indices of larger parks exceeded those of
smaller parks. By contrast, vegetation diversity, human
activity and park age explained only about 10% of
variation in those indices. Density and evenness varied
more between seasons (temporally) than between
parks (spatially). Bird density was mainly influenced
by season, while the number of bird species varied
more between parks. Among characteristics estimated,
diversity and family richness indices seemed to be the
two best indicators for monitoring bird communities
of urban parks in Kaohsiung city, because they were
the most sensitive to environmental changes.
Recommendations to increase bird diversity in
Kaohsiung city parks include: (1) increase area as
much as possible, at least to exceed 1.5 ha; (2)
increase vegetation diversity and cover, especially the
cover of bushes; (3) plant more native species of
vegetation to attract native bird species; and (4) create
more water sources to attract more species of
waterbirds.
36. Hu Meo-Fen (1999) Age identification and
population dynamics of Grey-cheeked Fulvetta
Alcippe morrisonia at Fushan Experimental
Forest. Department of Zoology, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Chou Liea-Siang.
To understand the population dynamics of Grey¬
cheeked Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia and the variation
resulting from seasonality and typhoons, 1,392
fulvettas were captured, marked and released during
January 1994 to October 1998 in Fushan
Experimental Forest station. In order to construct a
standard for age determination, skull pneumatisation,
iris colour, and moult patterns were recorded, and nine
external morphological characteristics were measured.
Skull pneumatisation was the most effective indicator
of age from April to September: 93.0% (n=243) of
individuals with the skull incompletely pneumatised
(lst-4th stages) were juvenile, and 92.9% of those with
skulls completely pneumatised (5th stage) were adult.
Adults’ irides were more reddish than juveniles’, which
were yellowish- or reddish-brown. No single external
morphological measurement could discriminate adults
from juveniles. Tarsus and wing length together in a
discriminant analysis gave an error rate of 37% for 155
known-age individuals. A key for age identification was
suggested, based on skull pneumatisation, moult
pattern, iris coloration and morphological discriminant
function. The error rate was higher in adults (25%,
n=261) and lower in juveniles (4.7%, n=296); the total
was 11% (n=551). Grey-cheeked Fulvetta showed a
type II survivorship curve. Annual disappearance rate
after fledging varied from 53% to 86%. Population
numbers at the start of the breeding season (April)
declined by 35% between 1994 and 1998, largely
owing to mortality caused by Typhoon Amber in
August 1997. Winter and typhoons were the major
non-biological factors limiting fulvetta populations.
Most typhoons reduced juvenile numbers, while adult
numbers remained stable except under Typhoon
Amber. About 47% of adult mortality happened in
winter (between November and March).
37. HsuYu-Teng (1999) The evolutionary relation¬
ships of Chinese [=Light-vented] Bulbul
Pycnonotus sinensis and Taiwan Bulbul P.
taivanus revealed by their population genetic
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
111
structure. Department of Zoology, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Lucia Liu Severinghaus.
Geographical isolation and natural hybridisation
between Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis and
Taiwan Bulbul P. taivanus provide a good opportunity
for studying avian speciation. We chose the rapidly
evolving mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control-region
(CR) sequences as a genetic marker and used
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and automated
DNA sequencing techniques to analyse population
genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships
between four subspecies of Light-vented Bulbul and
Taiwan Bulbul. A 1,110 base-pair (bp) mtDNA
(including 1081 bp control region [CR] and 29 bp t-
RNAPro) neighbour-joining tree for 27 individuals (of
the four subspecies) revealed no strict phylogenetic
relationships. In total, 123 haplotypes were detected in
the 536 bp hypervariable segment of the CR of
mtDNA for 258 individuals from 18 localities. Genetic
diversity indices showed high haplotype diversity (h) in
every population, averaging 0.925 (range: 0.725-1);
but low nucleotide diversity, averaging 0.00906 (range:
0.00538-0.01208). Neutrality tests (Tajima’s D, and
Fu and Li’s D test) suggested that the mtDNA evolves
in a selectively neutral manner. Population differentia¬
tion indices, including dA (Nei’s standard genetic
distance), NST (a population differentiation index)
and AMOVA (analysis of molecular variance), showed
no population genetic structure, and only little genetic
differentiation between the two species. The results of
the gene flow (Nm = the number of migrants per
generation) and the identical haplotypes among
populations, suggest that gene flow is the most plausi¬
ble cause for the limited mtDNA differentiation
between the two species. The haplotype relationship
network showed that P s. shirogashira (of Okinawa
island) probably originated from southern Taiwan; it is
morphologically close to P s. formosae. In conclusion,
combined results of both this and previous studies
showed no reproductive isolation and no apparent
differences in ecology, behaviour or genetics between
the two species. The two were presumably in an early
stage of speciation, but geographic isolation disap¬
peared thorough recent ecological and environmental
changes.
38. Yu Shu-chun (1999) The breeding and foraging
ecology of the Taiwan Laughing Thrush ^White-
whiskered Laughingthrush] Garrulax
morrisonianus in the Tatachia area, Taiwan.
Department of Forestry, National Taiwan University,
Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
I studied breeding and foraging ecology of White-
whiskered Laughingthrush Garrulax morrisonianus at
Tatachia, in the mountains of central Taiwan, from
April 1997 to December 1998. I examined the
species’s parental care, nest site selection, and intersex-
ual and interseasonal foraging resource partitioning.
White-whiskered Laughingthrush was monogamous,
with a breeding season from March to August. Both
parents shared nest building, incubation, brooding and
feeding. All clutches were of two eggs, which averaged
31.3±1.5 mm in length. Parental feeding frequency
increased with nestling age; invertebrates were the
most common food. Within breeding territories, nests
were located in areas with the highest tree densities.
Males foraged on branches higher than 8 m more often
than fenales, but on branches below 8 m less often than
females. Compared with the non-breeding season,
laughingthrushes in the breeding season foraged at
lower (0-2 m) and higher (8-14 m) heights, on shorter
(0-2 m) and taller (6-14 m) plants, on smaller (0-5 cm
dbh) and larger (15-40 cm dbh) trees, on smaller
(0-1 cm dbh) branches, and exhibited more glean,
flake, pry, sally, and sally-strike behaviours, and ate
more invertebrates, flower petals, and larger food items
(1-6 cm). White-whiskered Laughingthrushes seem to
be opportunistic foragers, with foraging behaviour
influenced by food availability, plant phenology,
weather and seasonal changes in their endogenous
physiological requirements. Seasonal variation in
foraging behaviour probably reflects changes in food
availability.
39. Liu Mark (1999) The cooperative breeding of
Taiwan Yuhina Yuhina brunneiceps at Mei-Fung
area, Taiwan. Department of Forestry, National
Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
In 1938, Taiwan Yuhinas Yuhina brunneiceps, which
are endemic to Taiwan, were found to breed coopera¬
tively. Further research on their breeding ecology was
conducted at Mei-Fung, in the mountains of central
Taiwan, from January 1997 to April 1999. The research
focused on territorial behaviour, pair relationships,
dominance hierarchies, breeding cooperation, parental
group formation and variation in group composition of
the 8-9 parental groups in the study area. Yuhinas
maintained territories and lived in parental groups
year-round. I observed 17 parental groups, each of 3-7
adults. The most common group size was four birds
(47%). Each parental group had 1-3 communally
nesting, monogamous, pairs and some had a single
unmated helper. Each parental group had a male
dominance hierarchy in which the head, wing, and tail
length of higher-ranking males exceeded those of
lower-ranking males (Mann-Whitney U tests; P<0.05).
Only the largest male, the alpha-male, engaged in terri¬
torial defence singing. Female rank in the dominance
hierarchy related not to body size but to mate’s rank.
Male yuhinas had significantly longer heads, wings and
tails than females (Mann-Whitney U tests; P< 0.05).
Each group member contributed to rearing the young
in the communal nest. During nest building and
incubation, the female worked harder than the male,
but when feeding nestlings the amount of work by
males and females was more variable. Each brood took
about 70 days to rear to fledging. Parental groups
could rear three broods each season. Nests used by two
or three females showed 2-3 different spot patterns on
the eggs, supporting earlier observations that egg spot
pattern is unique for each female. At Mei-Fung, new
individuals joining parental groups were either male
offspring from previous breeding seasons with a non-
relative mate, or an unrelated pair. From 24% to 30%
of the Taiwan Yuhinas at Mei-Fung disappeared
annually. One bird ringed as an adult in an earlier
study has lived at least eight years.
40. Chou Yi-Fang (2000) Waterfowl population,
activity pattern, and management of the Wu-Wei
112
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
habour, Han. Department of Forestry, National
Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
Wu-Wei harbour, in the southern half of the Ilan
plain, Ilan county, Taiwan, was designated a wildlife
refuge in 1993 to protect overwintering waterfowl. The
Kan-Ko irrigation canal flows into the harbour from
the north, forming a freshwater marsh. I studied the
abundance, distribution and behaviour of overwinter¬
ing waterfowl in and around the harbour, and
documented habitat changes to evaluate the harbour’s
importance to waterfowl overwintering on the Ilan
plain. I also reviewed papers about habitat and food
management to help resolve management problems at
Wu-Wei harbour. Finally, I provided suggestions for
future management and development of the refuge. I
surveyed waterfowl at Wu-Wei harbour, Chu-An, Lan-
Yan river, and 52-Chia from September 1998 to April
1999. Common Teal Anas crecca was the most
abundant species at each site. Waterfowl diversity was
great at Wu-Wei harbour (Simpson diversity index =
0.43), but there were more birds and more species at
Chu-An and 52-Chia. Thus, Wu-Wei harbour is the
third most important site for waterfowl overwintering
in Ilan county. From 1989 to 1996, the open water area
ofWu-Wei harbour gradually decreased with expansion
of emergent plants such as Phragmites sp. Waterfowl in
Wu-Wei harbour spent 12% of their time feeding, less
than they spent (>20%) in other studies in literature.
Flocks did not fly to nearby paddyfields to feed at
night. Many species of annual plants produced seeds
that may be used by waterfowl. Food resources might
be sufficient to support the waterfowl overwintering in
the harbour. Wu-Wei harbour could be managed
towards as an ecological refuge, both wildlife- and
human-orientated. ‘Moist-soil management’, used for
similar habitats in other countries, could improve
habitat quality and food resources at Wu-Wei harbour.
Monitoring of waterfowl, food resources and other
important variables should continue.
41. Chang Sue-Ching (2000) Songs and breeding
behaviour of Maroon Oriole Oriolus traillii.
Department of Biological Sciences, National SunYat-
sen University, Kaohsiung. Adviser: Chang
Hsueh-wen.
I divided the sounds of Maroon Oriole Oriolus
traillii into five types (Types A-E) according to aural
impression. Type A, a harsh ‘a-’, was given by both
sexes all year. It was possibly an unformed call, related
to Type E. Type B, a ‘wu-wu’ or ‘wu’, was a male song
functioning in mate attraction and territory defence.
Type C was a whistle, heard mostly from females in
reply to the male’s songs. Type D, ‘ga-ga-ga...’ or ‘ga-
ga-ga-a-ga-ga-ga...’ repeated shortly, was heard from
both sexes all year; its major function was alarm. There
was greater variation within Type E calls, which
sounded like ‘au-wai’, ‘au-wa’, ‘a-a’, ‘wa-au’ or ‘wa-wa-
gua-wa’. They were heard from both sexes and their
function was unresolved. Maroon Orioles bred from
mid-February to early July. Nest-building took about
7-12 days, and incubation about 20 days. Clutch size
was 3-4 eggs. Nestlings stayed in the nest for two
weeks. The female built the nest and incubated alone,
but shared feeding young with the male.
42. Kuo Wei-Wang (2000) Sex differences and
breeding ecology of Grey-cheeked .Fulvetta
Alcippe morrisonia at Fushan Experiment
Forest. Department of Zoology, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Chou Liea-Siang.
In order to understand morphological differences
between the sexes, the sex allocation of parental care,
the growth rate, and the sex ratio of Grey-checked
Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia , birds were captured and
measured from January 1994 to December 1999 at
Fushan Experimental Forest station. Germ feather and
blood samples of 328 birds collected from August
1997 to December 1999 allowed sexing by PCR
(Polymerase Chain Reaction). Breeding behaviour at
four nests was observed from April to May 1999.
Among morphological measurements, only wing
length and body mass differed significantly between
sexes. Wings of adult and juvenile males were signifi¬
cantly longer than those of females. Adult males
weighed significantly less than adult females and
juvenile males. Fulvettas were heaviest in September
and lightest in December. Body-mass changes during
the non-breeding season did not differ significantly
between sexes. During the early breeding season
(March), females gained more weight than did males.
Daily changes in weight were similar between sexes:
lightest in the morning; heaviest in late afternoon.
Sexes shared incubation, brooding and feeding young,
but with different weights. Females incubated more
often than males by day, and were totally responsible
for incubation at night. Parents fed young one item
each time. Food item size showed no significant differ¬
ence between sexes. Males fed more frequently than
did females, and older nestlings were fed more often
than were young ones. Body mass and tarsus length of
8-day-old fledglings and their growing patterns showed
no significant difference between sexes. No significant
sex-ratio bias was detected among Hedgings, juveniles
or adults.
43. Chen I-Ling (2000) Prey choice of Kentish
Plover Charadrius alexandrinus in winter atTatu
estuary, Taiwan. Department of Environmental
Science, Tunghai University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen
Peter Ping-Huang.
Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus is one of the
most common shorebirds on the western coast of
Taiwan, but its feeding ecology is little studied. This
study looked at the species’s diet, foraging behaviour
and net energy intake, through optimal diet theory.
Laboratory study was used to investigate the role of
prey crab species ( Mictyris brevidactylus, Scopimera
longidactyla, Uca lactea ) and size (each species divided
into three classes) in prey choice of captive plovers
from November 1997 to January 1998. Field studies of
foraging behaviour of plovers were conducted in
October and November 1998 at the Tatu estuary.
Results of the laboratory study showed that 5. longi¬
dactyla, small M. brevidactylus and small U. lactea were
preferred (P<0.05). In the field, Kentish Plover rarely
foraged on U. lactea. This difference to the laboratory
study was attributed to the escape capability of U.
lactea. Low-profitable M. brevidactylus is as important a
prey as the highly profitable Y. longidactyla , because its
overall profitability exceeds the energy intake rate of
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
113
plovers specialising on 5. longidactyla. Kentish Plovers
hunting for M. brevidactylus seemed to search more
slowly and with less aggression than did birds hunting
S', longidactyla. Energy cost-benefit calculations
showed similar net energy intake for foraging plovers
specialising on either of the two crabs, and maximum
intake while foraging on both.
44. Tsai Jo-Szu (2000) Fruit removal pattern on
Formosan sassafras Sassafras randaiense by
wildlife in Chilan area. Department of Forestry,
National Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan
Hsiao-Wei.
I studied fruit removal from Formosan sassafras
Sassafras randaiense (Lauraceae) to estimate relative
importance of different animals to this species’s disper¬
sal. In 1998 and 1999, I collected data at
Compartment 20 (1,100 m) in the Taiping work circle,
I-lan county, and Compartment 94 (2,000 m) in the
Tachi work circle, Hsin-chu county, Taiwan. I counted
the number of fruits taken from infructescences over
time to estimate the rate of fruit consumption, and I
determined the species of diurnal dispersers and seed
predators through direct observation. I used infrared
cameras to assess secondary dispersal of fruits and
seeds. In 1998 and 1999, 4.5% and 12% of all mature
fruits dried out and 0.1% and 0% fell to the ground,
respectively. Most fruits were consumed by wildlife,
including one mammal species (Pallas’s squirrel
Callosciurus erythraeus ) and 1 1 species of birds. The
bird species that ate sassafras fruits at the two sites
were totally different, reflecting differences in eleva¬
tion. Squirrels were seed predators and destroyed fruits
(89% and 18% of the fruits taken by birds or mammals
at Taiping and Tachi, respectively). Birds swallowed
fruits and defecated or regurgitated intact seeds.
Although the effects of these processes on sassafras
seed viability are not known, they remove the pulp and
probably do not harm the seeds. Thus, birds probably
act more as seed dispersers than as seed predators.
Taiwan Yuhina Yuhina brunneiceps consumed more
fruit than any other species. Black-browed Barbet
Megalaima oorti was probably the least effective seed
disperser, because it spent longer periods in sassafras
trees than did any other species of bird, and defecated
most seeds under the parent tree. Steere’s Liocichla
Liocichla steerii and White-whiskered Laughingthrush
Garrulax morrisonianus usually defecated in open
habitats, aiding seed dispersal and germination.
Because most (98.3%) fruits and seeds that fell on the
ground were eaten or damaged by the Formosan field
mouse Apodemus semotus, Formosan white-bellied rat
Niviventer culturatus or Pere David’s vole Eothenomys
melanogaster, there was little opportunity for secondary
dispersal.
45. Wang Chia-Chi (2001) Diurnal activity patterns
of wintering Black-faced Spoonbills Platalea
minor in Chigu, Tainan county. Department of
Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser:
WangYing.
From September 1998 to May 1999, diurnal time-
budgets of Black-faced Spoonbills Platalea minor were
recorded at the wintering area in Chigu, Tainan
county. Communal and individual behaviour, and
impact of disturbance on behaviour, were studied.
Activities were classed into seven categories. Resting
(80% of all observations) was the predominant diurnal
activity, followed by maintenance (10%), transitional
behaviour (5.7%), locomotion (3.2%), foraging
(0.93%), social interaction (0.45%) and others
(0.13%). Observations were grouped into ‘early
population stable period’ (mid-November-mid-
January) and ‘late period’ (mid-January-mid-March).
Only the proportion of time devoted to social interac¬
tion differed significantly between periods (P=0.027).
Individual rests lasted 1-35 minutes, mostly (57%)
less than five minutes. The major maintenance activity
was preening (76% all maintenance activity observa¬
tions), which often (in 43% of preening bouts) lasted
fewer than 10 seconds. Most transitional behaviour
was standing (95% all transitional behaviour observa¬
tions), and most locomotion was walking (91% all
locomotion observations). Diurnal foraging in the
main roosting area was very rare (0.9% of time).
Social interactions included friendly and agonistic
activities. Friendly activities were classified into four
types. The major type was allopreening (69% of all
friendly activities), mostly confined to the neck-to-
neck region (80% of preening observations). Agonistic
activities were classified into four types, and mainly
comprised aggression (61% of all observations of
agonistic activities). Social interactions occurred
mostly between sub-adults. Overall activity increased
after 15h00, peaking around 18h00 (75% of all the
activities observed in a day). Amounts of maintenance
activity, transitional behaviour and social interaction
differed significantly with time of day (P<0.001).
Spoonbills were disturbed on average 4.3 times per
day, mostly by other waterbirds and fishermen. The
predominant response was to fly and land some
distance away from the disturbance. Activities after
disturbance differed significantly from those before
disturbance (P<0.001). Maintenance activities, transi¬
tional behaviour, locomotion and social interaction
significantly increased after disturbance. Four radio-
tagged birds with 24-hour continuous monitoring
spent more time in the main roosting area (62-66%)
than in other areas (34-38%). The main roosting area
was important to this species, and needs an effective
management plan.
46.WuTsai-Yu (2001) Nest-site selection of Lanyu
Scops Owl [=Elegant Scops Owl] Otus elegans
botelensis. Department of Zoology, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Advisers: Lucia Liu Severinghaus
and LinYao-Sung.
‘Lanyu Scops Owl’ Otus elegans botelensis , a
subspecies of Elegant Scops Owl O. elegans , occurs only
on Lanyu island. The population is c. 1,000 birds. This
owl is a secondary cavity-nester; it cannot excavate a
hole for itself. Breeding success depends on cavity
availability. The current study investigated possible
criteria of cavity selection. Parameters of trees and
cavities were measured during the 2000 breeding
season, in a region with a high density of breeding
pairs. Owls seemed to select cavities for nesting on the
basis of the cavity’s size, interior moisture, flatness of
the bottom, smoothness of surface and height above
ground. They preferred high, large, dry and smooth
114
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
cavities, which provide a safe and comfortable
environment.
47. Lin Wen-lung (2001) Insect residual, pellet
analysis and hunting behaviour of the Brown
Hawk Owl [AYwox scutulata ] in Da-ken and Lien-
hwa-chi areas. Department of Entomology, National
Chung-Hsing University, Taichung. Adviser: Yeh Chin-
Chang.
This study investigated insects hunted by the
Brown Hawk Owl Ninox scutulata in Da-ken,
(Taichung) and Lien-hwa-chi (Puli) areas, in terms of
their numbers and estimated biomass, and frequency
of remains in regurgitated pellets. Lepidoptera,
Coleoptera, Homoptera and Orthoptera were most
frequently taken prey, making up 90% and 92% of
total prey items in the two areas respectively. Numbers
of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera taken remained
constant with season, but those of Homoptera and
Orthoptera varied. Scarabaeidae (17% and 25% in the
two areas) was the most frequently taken family,
followed by Sphingidae (11% and 14%), Cicadidae
(11% and 12%) and Noctuidae (8.4% and 11%).
Individuals of these four families constituted 50% and
60% of total insects taken. The same four orders also
represented the largest biomass, accounting for 95%
and 95% of the total. Scarabaeidae comprised the
highest percentage of biomass (14% and 23%),
followed by Cicadidae (17% and 18%), Acridiidae
(13% and 19%) and Sphingidae (8.9% and 10%). The
biomass produced by these four families represented
6 1 % and 6 1 % of the total insect biomass consumed by
owls. Remains of Lepidoptera, Homoptera, Odonata,
Phasmida, Megaloptera and Neuroptera were all found
in >96% of pellets, with Mantodea, Blattaria and
Orthoptera and Coleoptera found in 90%, 86%, 82%
and 69% respectively. The weight of individual insects
is highest in Acndidae, Lucanidae and Saturniidae; the
remaining 39 families have individual insects weighing
0.03-1 g. Analysis of pellets showed that small birds
formed the largest proportion of food items, c.35%
and 47% respectively at the two sites, with small
mammals forming 25% and 33% of food items.
Among foraging behaviours, hawking was most
frequent in spring at Da-ken (25 occurrences per hour)
and in winter at Lien-hwa-chi, and flycatching in the
autumn at both areas (16 occurrences per hour at Da-
ken and 22 occurrences per hour at Lien-hwa-chi).
The food niche breadth and evenness at Da-ken were
11.6 and 0.74 [unknown units] respectively, those at
Lien-hwa-chi were 8.9 and 0.55 [unknown units]
respectively, and the food niche overlap at both sites
was 93.9%.
48. Zong-Jiann Lin (2001) Feeding and reproduc¬
tive adaptation of Philippine Glossy Starling
Aplonis panayensis in Kaohsiung city. Department
of Biology, National Kaohsiung Normal University,
Kaohsiung. Advisers: Liang Shih-Hsiung and Shieh
Bao-Sen.
Observations of feeding and reproductive adapta¬
tions of Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis , an
exotic bird species in Taiwan, were conducted in the
Chiang Kai-shek Cultural Center and National
Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung city, from
January to December 2000. Possible impacts of the
glossy starling on native species of Taiwan, and its
projected population expansion were also evaluated.
Thirteen plant species were eaten by starlings in this
study. The number of native and exotic species was
almost equal. Glossy starlings fed mostly on fruit,
followed by nectar and petals. Protein for nestlings
comes partly from snails and caterpillars. Glossy
starlings bred from mid-March to mid-September in
2000. They retained cavity-nesting habits after intro¬
duction into Taiwan. Nest sites were used up to three
times in a single breeding season. Nest materials
included native and exotic plant species, and artificial
materials. The egg-laying period was 3-8 days. Clutch
size was 1-4 eggs, mostly three. Incubation lasted
1 1-15 days, with a hatching success rate of 62%. The
nestling period was 15-24 days, with a fledging success
rate of 43%. On average, 39 days were needed from
laying to fledging. Based on the Mayfield method,
survival rate and reproductive success rate were 44%
and 52% respectively. More singles were observed than
were any larger group sizes. Daytime activity levels
were influenced both by the time of day and season.
Activity of starlings was observed mostly during one
hour before or after sunrise or sunset. The largest
numbers of this species were observed during
16h00-18h00 in January and February 2000. The
population size of glossy starlings is projected to
increase, based on characteristics of feeding, reproduc¬
tion and daily activity. This species also possibly has a
direct and negative impact on Taiwan’s native birds,
such as Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis ,
Japanese White-eye Zosterops japonicus, Eurasian Tree
Sparrow Passer montanus and House Swift Apus ajfinis.
49. Chen Chihrhao (2000) A study of niche
relationship between Red Turtle [=Red Collared]
Dove Streptopelia tranquebarica and Spotted
Dove Streptopelia chinensis on Tung-hai
University campus, Taiwan. Department of
Environmental Science, Tunghai University, Taichung.
Adviser: Chen Peter Ping-Huang.
Red Collared Dove Streptopelia tranquebarica and
Spotted Dove 5. chinensis are common native species in
Taiwan, and coexist on Tunghai University Campus.
According to the competitive exclusion principle, if
two competing species coexist in a stable environment,
their resources will be partitioned, or one species will
become extinct. Birds reduce competition by spatial,
temporal, and dietary isolation. This study aimed to
identify niche relationships between the two doves.
These two doves coexist by differences in their feeding
and activity habitats. In the breeding season, require¬
ments of nest sites and food resources increased, so
niche overlap indices also did so. More detailed dietary
data would be needed to identify the degree of compe¬
tition, if any, between the two species.
50. Cheng Pei-Rong (2002) The diet and foraging
habitat requirements of Painted Snipe [=Greater
Painted-snipe] ( Rostratula benghalensis) during
the breeding season at Ham-bow wetland area.
Department of Biology, National Changhua Normal
University, Changhua. Advisers: Lee Shu-Wen and
Jiang Ling.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
115
Han-bow wetland, located on the boundary
between Fu-Xing village and Fang- Yuan village in
Changhua county, is typical of coastal areas. Farms,
horticultural lands and pasture have all commonly
been abandoned. Owing to the salinisation of land,
transformation of economic activities, and joining the
World Trade Organisation (WTO), yet more farmland
is being abandoned. To address agricultural loss and to
achieve ecological conservation, the Han-bow Ecology
Park is planned. Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula
benghalensis is a resident bird listed in Category 2 on
the Taiwan Wild Animal Conservation List. This
research aimed to document basic painted-snipe
feeding ecology to allow set-up and management of a
reserve for it. Painted-snipe numbers were investigated
from April to September in 2000 and in 2001. In 68
investigations, 780 individuals were found, but this
total includes repeat sightings. Average sex ratios in
both years were unity. Painted-snipes were found
mainly in newly sown paddyfields (27%), followed by
growing paddyfields (18%), harvested paddyfields
(24%), swamps (11%), ridges between fields (5%),
forage grass (5%), ditches (4%), abandoned or fallow
lands (4%), and others (2%). Statistical analysis
showed a significant preference for paddyfields (in any
cultivation stage). Analysis of droppings and extracts
from stomachs showed that painted-snipes mostly fed
on polychaete worms, dipterans and beetles before rice
grains were produced. After this, painted-snipes fed
mostly on the golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata,
rice grains and other plants in the grass family. In the
breeding season, P. canaliculata and rice grains were the
dominant food items. In the non-breeding season,
Capitellidae was the most numerous prey for painted-
snipes. There were significant positive correlations
between painted-snipe numbers and those of P canalic¬
ulata (r=0.91; P<0.001), and with the number of rice
grains (r=0.77; P=0.03). This suggested that P canalic¬
ulata and rice were the major foods in the breeding
season. Before rice grains are available, the diversity
and abundance of prey were high. After rice grains are
available, harvest reduced the diversity and abundance
of prey. Therefore, painted-snipes fed on the dominant
food items available. Painted-snipes may have moved
to nearby paddyfields for food because the responsibil¬
ity of breeding limits opportunities for longer-distance
foraging.
51. Li Chih-An (2002) The fat load shift and
migratory strategy of Dunlin ( Calidris alpina ) at
south Tatu estuary. Department of Environmental
Science, Tunghai University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen
Peter Ping-Huang.
Dunlin Calidris alpina is a common shorebird
breeding in high latitudes of the northern hemisphere,
and visiting Taiwan as a winter resident and double
passage migrant. Shorebird conservation requires an
understanding of migratory routes and the protection
of stopover sites. Studies of migratory routes and
strategies, and of fat load shifts of migratory shore-
birds, are badly needed in Taiwan. During September
2000-March 2001 and September 2001-April 2002,
fat load shifts of autumn and spring passage, and
wintering, Dunlin populations at Tatu estuary were
recorded using total body electric conductivity
(TOBEC). These data were used to suggest possible
migratory strategies and stopover sites for different
populations. For the two seasons, maximum fat deposi¬
tion rate of autumn passage birds was 42±1 1% (n=8)
and 35±13% (n=13), of wintering birds was 4 1 ± 1 8 %
(n=4) and 23±4.3% (n=14), and of spring passage
birds (recorded only during 2002) was 29±7.7%
(n=l 1). Fat load of autumn birds declined upon arrival
at the estuary and accumulated rapidly before depar¬
ture. Possible reasons for fat load decline are primary
moult and the search for suitable habitat. The fat load
of wintering birds also declined upon arrival. Average
fat load in the second season was lower than that of the
first season; both rainfall and disturbance were lower in
the second season. Wintering Dunlins started to
accumulate fat 20-30 days before departure to their
breeding sites. Daylight period differed significantly
before and after the start of accumulation of fat load
(P<0. 01). Temperature and wind speed and direction
did not differ significantly before and after the winter¬
ing population left the estuary. In spring passage, birds
did not moult primaries at the estuary and their fat
load did not decline when they arrived. The migratory
strategy of autumn populations is possibly energy-
selected and that of spring populations is possibly
time-selected. The estimated energy expense of
autumn populations is 50% lower than the energy
expense actually recorded. Estimated and recorded
time expenses of spring populations are similar.
Southbound populations in autumn can arrive in the
Philippines directly, but would need one more stopover
to reach Hainan island. Wintering and passage popula¬
tions migrating north during spring may use
Chun-Min island (Chongming Dao; in the Yang-Tze
river mouth) as a first stopover if their route is along
the south-east China coast, or Okinawa if they pass
through Japan. Sakhalin island breeders probably need
4-5 stopover sites, northern Siberian ones 6-7, and
Alaskan ones 7-8, to complete migration after Taiwan.
52. Shen Sheng-Feng (2002) The ecology of cooper¬
ative breeding Taiwan Yuhinas ( Yuhina
brunneiceps) in Mayfeng area. Department of
Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers:
Lee Pei-Fen and Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
We studied Taiwan Yuhina Yuliina brunneiceps , the
only joint-nesting passerine in Taiwan, in the
mountains of central Taiwan, from June 1999 to
September 2001. The male incubation hypothesis and
the costs and benefits of joint-nesting were investi¬
gated. Alpha females performed most incubation both
by day (67%, n=27) and by night (73%, n=ll),
contrary to the male incubation hypothesis. Yuhinas
inhabited a subtropical fluctuating environment with
high nest predation and frequent typhoons. Larger
groups did not have higher nest success rates or more
fledglings. Instead, they reduced their investment to
each single nest attempt by laying fewer eggs in the
nest, lightening the workloads of incubation and provi¬
sioning in joint-nesting groups. Individuals in larger
groups except alpha males had higher survival proba¬
bilities, especially for the females who lightened their
incubation load in larger groups. Larger groups may
1 16
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
have also built nests and renested faster than solitary
pairs, and had better home ranges in terms of possible
nest sites, food availability and tree cover. Therefore,
joint-nesting behaviour may possibly represent a bet¬
hedging strategy for a fluctuating environment.
53. Lin Chu-Ji (2002) Analysis of the biodiversity
of birds at county level in Taiwan. Department of
Forestry, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers:
Yuan Hsiao-Wei and Chiou Chyi-Rong.
Biodiversity is a critical issue in conservation
research, yet the concept is so broad that it causes
problems in application to the real environment. Birds
are sensitive to changes in habitat and they are
positioned at the higher levels of the food chain; and,
compared with other species, they are more easily
sampled. Hence, they are a good biological indicator
for larger-scale biodiversity research. This study
analysed the quality of the database from Wild Bird
Federation Taiwan (WBFT) for each county, and
investigated distribution patterns of bird diversity with
place, elevation, season etc. It also examined distribu¬
tion of protected birds and of bird hotspots. Existing
sample effort reflects, roughly, current bird diversity
for most counties. There are commonly more data
from low-elevation counties and fewer data from
certain counties from the period of June to August. In
each county, bird diversity has a significant positive
correlation with county area and elevation range. The
diversity of migratory birds showed no significant
correlation with any factor. In each county, breeding
bird diversity shows a bell-shaped curve with elevation,
peaking at about 1,000-2,000 m. Diversity of breeding
birds shows little fluctuation with season, but diversity
of migratory birds is lower from June to August.
Analysis of hotspots found significant correlations
among breeding birds, protected species and endemic
species. The distribution of protected species in Taiwan
is significantly localised. This study’s results for bird
diversity of each county can serve as a reference for
bird protection planning and nature conservation
zoning for each county. Besides, although the database
of WBFT is built from counting sites and frequencies
that are not evenly distributed, it reflects well enough
actual patterns of bird diversity for it to be a most
important link to promote a future Taiwan Biological
Resources Inventory.
54. Yao Cheng-te (2002) The breeding ecology of
the Malayan Night Heron ( Gorsachius melano-
phus ) [ = G. melanolophus\ in central Taiwan.
Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung.
Advisers: Lin Liang-kong andYo Shao-pin.
Malayan Night Heron Gorsachius melanolophus
inhabits lowland wooded areas in Taiwan. I studied its
reproductive success in the urbanised areas of Tai¬
chung, Nan-tao, Yun-lin, and Chia-I counties, in
central Taiwan. A total of 67 nests was monitored in
2000 and 200 1 . The breeding season lasted 2 1 0 days in
2000 and 220 days in 2001. Clutch size was 2-6 eggs
(3.4±0.8, n=67); brood size was 0-4 nestlings
(2.5±1.5, n=67; all ± figures refer to one standard
deviation). Of 67 nests, 46 successfully fledged at least
one young. The mean number of young fledged per
nest was 1.9±1.5 chicks. Incubation period lasted
30.4±1.2 days, and nestling stage 36.012.1 days.
Nesting success measured by the Mayfield method was
65% in 2000 and 62% in 2001. There was no differ¬
ence between pooled-interval success rate of first nests
(61%) and of second broods (69%; Z=0.57; P> 0.05).
Pooled interval success rate of yearlings’ nests was 21%
(n=17), whereas it was 74% (n=50) for nests of older
birds (Z=6.02; P<0.05). Mean number of young
fledged per nest by older birds was 2.211.5 (n=37),
while it was only 0.911.3 (n=15) by pairs with at least
one yearling. Re-use of old nests was common (50% of
active nests observed had already been used at least
once). Breeding success of re-used nests was 80%,
while it was 47% for new nests (Z=-2.82; P< 0.05).
Among nests in four categories of land-use, nests in
rural landscapes had pooled-interval success rates
(85%) significantly higher than those in managed
landscapes (49%; Z=2.79; P<0.05) or agricultural land
(49%; Z=2.01; P<0.01). Comparing estimated daily
survival probabilities of nests categorised in two groups
of structural stability index (SS-1, those damaged or
destroyed one year after breeding; and SS-2, those not
damaged within one year), no significant difference
was found (Z—0.89; P> 0.05). Predation, starvation,
infertile or addled eggs and inclement weather were
identified as major sources of mortality during incuba¬
tion and nestling stages. The main factors affecting
reproductive success of Malayan Night Heron are age
of breeders, nest predation, inclement weather, land-
use type and reusage of old nests.
55. Chang Chia-Wei (2002) The impact of migra¬
tory shorebirds’ (Scolopacidae and Charadri-
idae) feeding on prey abundance with exclosure
experiment in Su Tsao Wild Life Reserve.
Department of Biology, National Changhua University
of Education, Changhua. Adviser: Jiang Ling.
The Su Tsao Wildlife Reserve is very important for
winter migrant birds in south-west Taiwan. Feeding is
the main activity of wintering shorebirds. Exclosure
experiments and stomach content analysis were under¬
taken to assess the impacts of winter shorebird feeding
on prey abundance in the reserve. Other than water
depth, environmental factors showed no significance
differences between days on which experiments were
carried out. Feeding shorebirds reduced invertebrate
numbers, but if numbers of birds were few, numbers of
invertebrates showed no significant decline. The
reduced quantity of invertebrates was positively corre¬
lated with the numbers of shorebirds. Stomach
contents showed that shorebirds consumed Thiara
riqueti, Neanthes glandicincta, and Capitellidae sp(p).;
exclosure experiments produced the same result. At
night, shorebirds still fed and reduced the numbers of
invertebrates. The distribution of shorebirds did not
affect invertebrate numbers, suggesting that inverte¬
brates were abundant enough to meet shorebird needs.
Feeding rates of shorebirds might be over-estimated by
mathematical magnification. More information about
resident invertebrates, such as life cycle and activity
times, would inform understanding of feeding ecology
of winter shorebirds.
56. Liu, Wei-Ting (2002) Habitat selection, repro¬
ductive success and management of waterbirds
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
117
breeding in Changhua Coastal Industrial Park.
Department of Environmental Science, Tunghai
University, Taichung. Adviser: Chen Peter Ping-
Huang.
Very high proportions of the coastal zone in western
Taiwan have been converted to industrial use.
Changhua coastal industrial park (3,643 ha) is the
second largest such area. About 90% of the area was
not in use, and provided suitable habitat for waterbirds
roosting in winter and breeding in summer. Breeding
Little Terns Sterna albifrons and Kentish Plovers
Charadrius alexandrinus in Changhua coastal industrial
park form the biggest colonies in Taiwan. Greater
Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis, Oriental
Pratincole Glareola maldivarum and Little Tern are
Category 2 conservation species in Taiwan. I studied
breeding habitat selection of ground-nesting water-
birds in Changhua to identify factors causing breeding
failure, and to provide suggestions for future manage¬
ment. I found 33 Little Tern nests, four Kentish Plover
nests and two Oriental Pratincole nests in a 13.2 ha
area in Lungwei in 1998, and 1 17 Kentish Plover nests
and one Oriental Pratincole nest in eight sites totalling
22.7 ha in Shengshi. Black-winged Stilts Himantopns
himantopus and painted-snipes also bred in the study
area. Kentish Plovers and Little Terns nested on the
gravel substrate provided by land-fill. Little Tern nests
were significantly closer to the nearest road and nearest
nesting terns than were random points. Kentish Plover
nest sites showed no difference from random points in
the distance to the nearest road, distance to nearest
vegetation line and distance to nearest plover nest.
Hatching success in 1998 was very low: only 25% of
Little Tern nests and 50% of Kentish Plover nests
hatched, but in 1999, 89% of Kentish Plover nests
hatched. Artificial nests set in May 1999 estimated
26% hatching success of Little Tern and 19% of
Kentish Plover. Flooding through heavy rain in spring
and summer was the main reason for nest failure: 26
nests in 1998 and six Kentish Plover nests and ten
artificial nests in 1999 were flooded. Clutch predation
was rare: only two Kentish Plover nests and nine artifi¬
cial nests in 1999 were taken, mainly by dogs. Garbage
dumping and researcher activities (attracting dogs into
breeding sites) were the only human disturbances
recorded. The gravel habitat in Changhua provides
suitable breeding habitat for ground-nesting water-
birds. Development of the industrial park and the
increase of vegetation cover are the main factors
reducing habitat, and flooding is the main factor
causing breeding failure. To protect breeding water-
birds, a 26 ha reserve should be legally designated in
Shangshi West-2 area.
57. Liu Chao-Kuo (2002) A study of diurnal
activity patterns by Eurasian Curlew ( Numenius
arquata) at Tatu estuary, Taiwan. Department of
Environmental Science, Tunghai University, Taichung.
Adviser: Chen Peter Ping-Huang.
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata is an
uncommon wintering shorebird in Taiwan, with the
biggest population at the Tatu estuary. Construction of
the Tai Power Generator displaced this population
south from the rivermouth. For the last five years
(1996-2000), birds have wintered on the coastline at
the Changhua coastal industrial park. Counting data
show this population is decreasing. Increase of coastal
land conversion and human disturbance make conser¬
vation issues for this population urgent. This research
investigated the daytime activity pattern of Eurasian
Curlew and its relation with abiotic factors. The census
took place on 25 days from 5 October 2000 to 25
March 2001. Scanning was used to record behaviour,
and tide height, wind speed and temperature were the
abiotic factors recorded. Eurasian Curlews stood near
the tide edge and moved with it during the high-tide
period. The flock did not move with the tide during the
low-tide period, but each individual moved from the
group to the tide edge 3-4 times. Rest was the predom¬
inant daytime activity (80% of time). The pattern was
obviously much more correlated with the tidal cycle
than with the day-night cycle. Both preening
(Spearman’s r=-0.53) and resting (r=0.24) levels
showed significant correlation (P<0.01) with wind
speed. Spatial, maintenance and feeding behaviour
showed significant differences (P<0.01) between highl¬
and low-tide periods. Human disturbance was mainly
a result of aquaculture, tourism and fishing, and birds
appeared gradually to get used to noise. Feeding
behaviour and temperature were positively correlated
(r=0.20, P<0.01). The proportion of time spent
feeding showed significant variation (P<0.01) with
temperature between the early, mid- and late winter.
The proportion of time spent feeding at low tide was
higher than at high and mid-tide. The low proportion
of time spent feeding during daytime suggests that
Eurasian Curlew may feed mainly by night at the Tatu
estuary.
58. Wang Lee-ping (2003) Breeding habitat selec¬
tion and breeding biology of Blue-tailed
Bee-eaters ( Merops philippinus) on Kinmen
island. Department of Forestry, National Taiwan
University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
I studied breeding habitat selection and breeding
biology of Blue-tailed Bee-eaters Merops philippinus on
Kinmen island from 2000 to 2002. Blue-tailed Bee-
eaters only dug nest holes in the Kinmen geological
layer and on sandy soils, which both have characteris¬
tically low clay contents. From the 822 bee-eaters
observed, 84% dug nest holes on natural cliffs and
16% on artificial farmland. Only 8% of nest holes were
dug in radial colonies, the remaining 92% being on
one-sided open colonies. Scan observations revealed
that the diet of bee-eaters comprised mainly insects,
mostly Odonata (49%), Homoptera (17%), Diptera
(13%) and Lepidoptera (12%). Water quality tests of
nearest water bodies to six nest colonies showed no
significant differences between retained and
abandoned nest colonies in dissolved oxygen, BOD,
pH and some nutrients (P04‘3, NOy, N, Cl', S04"2,
NH4+, HC03‘, COy, Ca, Mg, Na, K). The nearest
water bodies of abandoned nest colonies had lower
electro-conductivity than did those for retained
colonies, which positively correlated with species
richness and abundance of dragonflies, the main diet of
the bee-eaters. Blue-tailed Bee-eaters mainly dug nest
holes on cliffs with no or little vegetation, and with low
vegetation structure in front of the colony. This might
increase detection of nest predators, and thus reduce
118
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
nest predation. Bee-eaters were mainly colonial
breeding and monogamous on Kinmen. In the 2001
breeding season, 83% of the chicks hatched within a
nine-day period, suggesting the bee-eaters were
breeding in synchrony. Sixteen nests had more than
two adults feeding chicks, suggesting cooperative
breeding.
59. Wu Shih-Hung (2003) Territory and habitat use
of Formosan Rufous-backed Shrike [Long-tailed
Shrike] ( Lanins schach formosae) in Hualien.
Institute of Nature Resources, National Dong Hwa
University, Hualien. Adviser: Wu Hai-Yin.
I studied the relationships between vegetation
structure and habitat use of Long-tailed Shrikes Lanins
schach. I assumed that food availability for shrikes, a
perch-hunting predator, is determined by perch
density and understorey cover, and hypothesised that
shrikes would concentrate foraging in habitat patches
with high food availability. The study was conducted
on farmland along Hualien river from January to May
2002. The study area was divided into five habitat types
according to perch density and understorey cover.
Ringed shrikes were followed and their perch locations
and behaviour were recorded. Observations were
divided into three stages: pre-nesting, pre-fledging and
post-fledging. Territories of individual shrikes were
determined by perch locations. Shrikes had stable
territories, the area of which correlated with the ratio
of the area of low-perch-density habitat type to total
territory size. Compositional analysis revealed that
shrikes used habitat types with high perch density and
low understorey cover more than the other types.
There was no significant difference among the areas of
territories in the three breeding stages. However,
searching time decreased from pre-breeding stage to
post-breeding stage. This suggested that, instead of
extending territory size, shrikes increased their prey
attack rates to cope with the increasing energy demand
through the breeding season.
60. Wu Jeng-Wen (2003) A study on the effects of
altitudes and habitats on nest predation risk.
Institute of Tropical Agriculture and International
Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science
and Technology, Pingtung. Advisers: Yeh Ching-Long
and Sun Yuan-Hsun.
Nest predation is one of the major causes of repro¬
ductive failure among birds, suggesting a close
correlation between birds’ reproduction rate and nest
predator abundance. Composition and foraging behav¬
iour of nest predators should determine patterns of
nest predation. It would inform understanding of bird
reproduction to study population dynamics of nest
predators. Shell remains in artificial nests and an
automatic camera system were used in this study to
evaluate the nest predation risks of ground-nesting
birds at different altitudes and in different habitats.
This study found that the highest predation rate
occurred at medium altitudes (about 2,000 m), an
intermediate rate at low altitudes (about 1,000 m), and
the lowest rate at highest altitudes (about 3,000 m).
Predation rates were higher in both medium- and low-
altitude forests than in grasslands of similar altitude.
There was no difference in predation rate between
forest and grassland at high altitude. Species composi¬
tion of nest predators varied with altitudes and
habitats. Most nest predators were mammals, some
were birds and snakes. Nest predator species richness
was higher in forest at medium and high altitude than
at low altitude. To sum up, altitudes and habitats were
two major factors affecting the nest predation rates of
ground-reproducing birds. Different environmental
conditions in different habitats may be the reasons for
different nest predation risks.
61. Li Pei-Ying (2003) An analysis of habitat selec¬
tion for foraging, singing and nesting of the
Grey-cheeked Fulvetta ( Alcippe tnorrisonia) at
Fushan Experimental Forest. Department of
Forestry, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers:
Chen Chao-Jie and Wang Li-Chih.
To investigate the ecological significance of differ¬
ences in habitat selection among foraging, singing and
nesting Grey-cheeked Fulvettas Alcippe morrisonia , we
investigated the habitat use during breeding season
(March-July) 2002 at Fushan Experimental Forest.
Fulvettas used Lauraceae and Fagaceae mostly, and
their foraging and singing macrohabitat (10x10 m) and
microhabitat (in the canopy) were similar, but not at
the same height and position. Comparing foraging or
singing habitat with nest-sites, most habitat character¬
istics showed significant differences. Nest-site
macrohabitat differed from foraging and singing
macrohabitat. Fulvettas nested in shrubs but used
mostly trees when foraging or singing (where trees and
shrubs were defined as differing in shape, height,
diameter at breast height and other characters).
62. Tu Hsiao-Wei (2003) Geographic variation of
Hwamei ( Garrulax canorus) songs. Department
of Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Adviser: Lucia Liu Severinghaus.
Taiwan Hwamei Garrulax canorus taewanus and
Chinese Hwamei G. c. canorus are found, respectively,
only in Taiwan, and in central and southern mainland
China. Their drab appearance and dense habitat make
their long and complex vocalisations extremely impor¬
tant in social behaviour. This study compared 229
Taiwan Hwamei songs (from 20 birds) and 227
Chinese Hwamei songs (from 20 birds) at the note,
syllable, songs and syntax levels, both micro- and
macro-geographically. Geographic variation occurred
mainly at the syllable level .Taiwan Hwamei songs from
the three sampling locations differed in diverse ways,
while in Chinese Hwamei songs there was a fair
overlap of syllables and syntax between sampling
locations, but the extent of sharing decreased with
distance. Chinese Hwamei songs were more complex
than Taiwan Hwamei songs, containing significantly
more syllable types, more syllable changes, larger
syntax combinations and fewer syllable repeats per
song. Most syllable types, ways of syllable changes and
syntax patterns in Taiwan Hwamei songs were also
present in Chinese Hwamei songs, but not vice versa.
This could reflect founder effects or locations of past
refugia. Taiwan has not been isolated from China for
very long, hence songs of these two Hwamei subspecies
are still similar.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-2003
119
63. Hung Hsin-Yi (2003) Identifying the paternity
within the breeding group of Taiwan Yuhina
( Yuhina brunneiceps) by DNA microsatellite at
Mei Feng area. Department of Forestry, National
Taiwan University, Taipei. Adviser: Yuan Hsiao-Wei.
Taiwan Yuhina Yuhina brunneiceps , endemic to
Taiwan, exhibits cooperative joint nesting behaviour.
Parental groups comprise 2-7 adults with monoga¬
mous pairs, some with helper(s). I examined 12
broods, totalling 46 nestlings, using DNA microsatel-
lites to identify paternity and the genetic mating
system. More than one female from the group laid eggs
in the nest. Genetic monogamy was the major mating
system, but 20% of offspring were from inter-group
EPF (extra-pair fertilisation), 20% were from intra¬
group EPF, 50% of broods involved inter-group EPF
and 67% involved intra-group EPF. Bigger groups had
higher proportions of EPF. Compared to other plural
breeding bird species, the inter-group EPF of Taiwan
Yuhina was higher. Each group had a linear hierarchy
of socially monogamous pairs. I compared morphol¬
ogy, residency and breeding behaviour between alpha
and beta males and females. I also investigated the
effect of hierarchy on reproductive fitness. Alpha males
had a longer natural and maximum wing length, a
longer residency and sang more than beta males, but
alpha and beta females did not differ in size or
residency. In four-member groups, alpha females had
significantly more offspring than beta females, but
there was no difference between alpha and beta males.
Alpha females also incubated, both diurnally and
nocturnally, more than other group members. Group
members contributed equally during the nestling
provisioning period. The skew index among females
was 0.29 for groups with only two females; it rose with
increasing number of females in the group, indicating
a higher skew towards to alpha female in larger groups.
Adults in the breeding group were not full siblings.
64. Chang Yung-Fu (2003) A study on corpus-based
analysis for a bird sound recognition system.
Institute of Electrical Engineering, National Dong
Hwa University, Hualien. Adviser: Sun Tsung-Ying.
This paper develops a bird sound recognition
system based on corpus analysis, a system usually
applied in computational linguistics. Each kind of bird
sound has a special frequency sequence. Feature
segmentations of bird sounds were found through
voice-print analysis, so that the frequency sequence,
called the corpus, was obtained. We created a corpus
database for over 90 kinds of corpus of birds in Taiwan.
This provides the knowledge base for a bird sound
recognition engine. Three successive processing stages,
bird sound preprocessing, corpus analysis, and target
bird sound searching, occur in the bird sound recogni¬
tion system. First, the sound of the as-yet unrecognised
bird (URB) is preprocessed by a fifth-order
Butterworth filter to eliminate environment noise. The
corpus analysis stage performs automated feature
segmentations of bird sound, partitioned into
frequency sequence. The URB is then searched
through the corpus database by a recognition engine.
The result of this system is a list of candidate target
birds, ranked by sound similarity in frequency
sequence. Adopting the corpus database by using
frequency sequence reduces the database capacity,
speeds recognition and gives a high correction ratio.
Next steps are to transplant the system to personal
digital assistant (PDA), smart phone etc. In future, it
could also be extended to human natural language
recognition.
65. Chen Cheng-Chung (2003) The landscape
resource of avifauna of Tali river, Taichung
Hsien — the section from Tawei bridge to
Chungtou highway bridge. Department of Geology,
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. Adviser:
Cheng Sheng-Hua.
To study landscape resources for avifauna in a
Taiwan riverbank, fieldwork was conducted at ten sites
along the bank of Tali river, from Tawei bridge to
Chungtou highway bridge, four times monthly from
March 2001 to February 2002. A total of 51 species in
26 families were recorded. In total, 15,518 individuals
were recorded, comprising 73% residents (of 27
species), 21% summer or winter visitors (20 species),
5% cage birds (3 species) and 1% species which occur
only on passage (1 species). Simpson’s Index of bird
diversity exceeded 0.9 in every month, except August
(0.83) and September (0.86). Bird diversity peaked in
spring and summer. Species richness was highest in
winter and spring (48 species), and lowest in summer
(20 species). Grassland (Japanese or manyflower silver-
grass Miscanthus floridulus ) and bushes were more
important habitats for birds than were farmland, artifi¬
cial lawns and leisure areas. People and their leisure
activities displaced most birds. The Tali riverbank, an
area integrating fresh water and land ecosystems, is
good habitat for resident and migrant birds. Public and
private authorities of Tali city should pay more atten¬
tion to ecological planning of the river and its bank for
sustainable management.
66. Chen Chen-jung (2003) Territorial behaviour
and habitat use in Plumbeous Water Redstart
(Rhyacornis fuliginosus affinis). Department of
Biology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Adviser: Wang Ying.
From November 2001 to April 2003, the behaviour
and the habitat use of 13 Plumbeous Water Redstarts
Rhyacornis fuliginosus were observed in Wulai, Taipei.
Playback and male models were used to test relation¬
ships between habitat selection and territorial
maintenance by the male owners. Available stream
bank habitat (81%) far exceeded that of stream surface
(19%). The species spent equal time in both habitats,
indicating that it preferred surface to bank. Males
spent more time foraging on the stream surface (67%
of observed foraging time), spending 53% of total time
on big rocks, which composed 21% of the total area;
hence, they favoured this microhabitat type (1-way
ANOVA, P<0.001). Furthermore, male singing was
also observed more frequently on big rocks (57% of
singing obervations). Use of big rocks may be related
to territorial maintenance, because during playback,
males first appeared on big rocks on 69% of occasions,
and 82% of male song responses to playback were
performed on big rocks. Compared with randomly
selected sites, big rocks had wider viewing area (1,872
m2, N=39; vs. 374 m2, N=29), which may help male
120
WOEI-HORNG FANG
Forktail 21 (2005)
owners to detect intruders earlier. Male models were
found more easily on big rocks than on other micro¬
habitats by a group of tested people, suggesting that a
male owner perched on a big rock will be more easily
detected by an intruder. The big rock microhabitat
seemed to be important for males during territorial
defence.
67. Yeh Yu-Ling (2003) Grouping and vigilance
behaviour in Ring-necked [= Common] Pheasant
( Phasianus colchicus formosanus) . Department of
Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei. Advisers:
LinYao-Sung andWu Hai-Yin.
Vigilance helps feeding animals defend themselves
from predators. Individuals in a group might benefit
from cooperative vigilance. To study factors affecting
vigilance behaviour of Common Pheasant Phasianus
colchicus formosanus , we recorded group size and
composition, environmental factors, auditory signals
and human activities using five-minute focal sampling
in National Dong Hwa University from July 2002 to
March 2003. Biological factors such as group size and
composition, rather than environmental factors, signif¬
icantly affected vigilance levels of pheasants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Will Duckworth for extensive editorial improvements to an
earler draft.
REFERENCES
Charnov, E. L. (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value
theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9(2): 129-136.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated,
checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Woei-horng Fang, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, #7,
Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 10063. Email: whfang@ha. me. ntu.edu. tw
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 121 131
Birds of Tapuafu peninsula, Roti island,
Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Roti island lies 10 km south of West Timor in the Lesser Sundas, Indonesia. Its bird fauna is poorly known. During 16-23 December
2004, 104 bird species were observed on the northern Tapuafu peninsula, including 32 new island records. Eight species of conserva¬
tion importance were recorded: Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatna sulphured (Critically Endangered), Timor Green Pigeon Treron
psittacea (Endangered) and six Near Threatened species: Black Cuckoo Dove Turacoena modesta , Pink-headed Imperial Pigeon Ducula
rosacea , Darter Anhinga melanogaster, Olive-shouldered Parrot Aprosmictus jonquillaceus. Orange-sided Thrush Zoothera peronh and
White-bellied Bushchat Saxicola gutturalis.
INTRODUCTION
Roti is a small island that lies 10 km south of the south¬
west part of Timor island and 12 km south of Semau
in the central Lesser Sundas, Indonesia (Fig. 1). The
island is 45 km long, 10-15 km wide, and has an area
of 1,226 km2 (Monk et al. 1997). The island is low with
a maximum elevation of 440 m, and it is entirely
formed by coralline limestone. Two long bays and
associated mudflats almost bisect the northern penin¬
sula, which covers c. 150 km2 and is known locally as
Landu in the East Roti sub-district. Nine small islands
are associated with Roti, including Ndana island
(c.15.6 km2), Dao island (c.12 km2), Nusa island
(c.9 km2), Doo island (c.3 km2) and Batu Heliana
(c.0.05 km2).
FAO/UNDP (1982) proposed two key protected
areas, both on Roti’s northern Tapuafu peninsula: a
60 km2 Wildlife Sanctuary covering ‘Tanjung Pakuatu’,
and a 1 0 km2 Game Reserve named ‘Landu mangrove
swamp’. They noted that undisturbed dry forests,
extensive mangrove and large lakes including Lake
Oendui (‘Oindoei’ in Mees 1975) occurred, and that
the region was thought to be rich in wildlife
(FAO/UNDP 1982).
The birds of Roti have been little studied. Ten Kate
collected 14 species on Roti in 1891-1893 (see
Biittikofer 1892, Mees 1975). Father J. A. J. Verheijen
visited in March-April 1969 and listed 90 species,
including 45 species that were collected and later
deposited at the Leiden Museum, 33 species that were
observed and 12 species that were reported by local
informants. Verheijen collected on Dao, Doo and Nusa
islands and apparently ‘not the zoologically most inter¬
esting part’ of Roti according to Mees (1975). G. F.
Mees curated Verheijen’s collection, and commented
on his manuscript which was eventually published in
1976 (Verheijen 1976). Mees (1975) considered
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the Tapuafu peninsula and Roti island in the Lesser Sundas, Indonesia. Site numbers:
1. 3 km north-west of Sipu; 2. Lake Muke; 3. 2 km north-west of Sipu; 4. Lake Oendui; 5. Daurendaye; 6. Dead Sea; 7.
Olokama; 8. Lake Oeina Lay; 9. Lake Oeina; 10. Lake Lendooen; 1 1. Pantai Baru.
122
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
records to be unconfirmed if they were not backed by
specimens, and presumably was motivated to publish
an account of Roti’s birds — after reading Verheijen’s
manuscript — in an attempt to clarify the scientific
record. Ron Johnstone surveyed birds over 13 days in
central and southern Roti and Pulau Ndana and Batu
Heliana during October 1990. Paul Jepson surveyed
birds in central Roti over four days in
September-October 1993. These two authors
published a joint paper based on their surveys which
documented the 86 species that they recorded (incor¬
rectly given as 83 species in the abstract) and included
119 bird species in a review of the island’s avifauna
(Johnstone and Jepson 1996). Johnstone and Darnell
(1997) described a new race of Southern Boobook
Ninox novaeseelandiae.
This paper documents the status and habitat use of
birds on the Tapuafu peninsula of northern Roti, with
particular emphasis on threatened, restricted-range
and forest birds plus waterbirds.
METHODS
I visited Roti island for eight days during 1 6-23
December 2004. Birds were observed with 8x32 binoc¬
ulars during daily walks of 5-15 1cm from Daurendale
hamlet (Sotimori village. East Roti subdistrict)
through woodland and forest, and visiting saline and
freshwater lakes (see sites in Table 1). Bird calls were
recorded with a Sony cassette recorder, and footage of
a small number of species was taken with a digital
video recorder. Coordinates were measured with a
Global Positioning System. Seabirds were recorded
along the 50 km Bolok (West Timor)-Pantai Baru
(Roti) route, and limited observations were made
along roads between Pantai Baru and Daurendale.
Taxonomy follows Inskipp et al. (1996), restricted-
range status follows Stattersfield et al. (1998), and
IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife International
(2004, 2005).
RESULTS
The following list provides details of records of threat¬
ened, restricted-range and forest birds, plus significant
records of other species. A total of 104 species were
found, including 32 new island records. Birds of
conservation importance that were recorded include
Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea (Critically
Endangered), Timor Green Pigeon Treron psittacea
(Endangered) and six Near Threatened species: Black
Cuckoo Dove Turacoena modesta, Pink-headed
Imperial Pigeon Ditcula rosacea , Darter Anhinga
melanogaster, Olive-shouldered Parrot Aprosmictus
jonquillaceus. Orange-sided Thrush Zoothera peronii and
White-bellied Bushchat Saxicola gutturalis. Square
brackets in the list below indicate species not recorded
in the present survey. Waterbird records are
summarised in Table 2. The appendix lists all 145
species now confirmed for Roti, and a further seven
species noted by Verheijen (1976) which require
further information to verify their presence on Roti.
Red Junglefowl G alius gallus
A male observed north of Olokama is the first
confirmed record from mainland Roti. This species is
Forktail 21 (2005)
Birds of Tapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
123
probably uncommon on Roti because only a few were
heard. Verheijen (1976) stated that the species ‘is well
known on Roti’. Johnstone and Jepson (1996) saw two
birds on Batu Heliana.
Rainbow Bee-eater Merops ornatus
This species was frequent in small groups of 3-15 birds
in all habitats. It has been considered an Australian
winter migrant to the Lesser Sundas (e.g. Johnstone
and Jepson 1996, Coates and Bishop 1997). Verheijen
(1976) noted that ‘nesting holes of a Merops species are
found in Dengka [a district in western Roti]’ suggest¬
ing that the species is probably a breeding resident.
However, in the Lesser Sundas, it sometimes makes
nest holes without laying eggs (R. Johnstone in litt.
2005), so confirmation of breeding on Roti is needed.
Rainbow Lorikeet Trichoglossus haematodus
This lorikeet was surprisingly uncommon with only
two brief observations of pairs in dry woodland near
Olokama.The birds had orange-red breasts, similar to,
but perhaps brighter than, those of the race capistratis
which is endemic to Timor.
Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphured
Critically Endangered. On Roti, this species is appar¬
ently uncommon. One was heard at Dead Sea on 17
December 2004; a pair was observed in flight 3 km
north-west of Sipu on 18 December 2004; one was
seen at Lake Lendooen on 19 December 2004; and
one was disturbed from tropical woodland near Lake
Oeina on 21 December 2004. Local people at
Daurendale had a male and a female taken from nest
holes, and an additional bird had recently died.
Demand for the capture of birds for trade is driven by
regional traders from Baa (Roti) or Kupang (West
Timor).
Olive-shouldered Parrot Aprosmictus jonquillaceus
Restricted-range; Near Threatened. This parrot was
relatively uncommon but widespread in tropical forest
and woodland, where singles and small groups of 3-5
were recorded daily.
[Southern Boobook Ninox novaeseelandiae
No owls were observed during this visit to Roti. The
endemic race rotiensis is known from a single specimen
collected near Pantai Baru (Johnstone and Darnell
1997) and may have a limited range on the island (R.
Johnstone in litt. 2005).]
Black Cuckoo Dove Turacoena modesta
Restricted-range; Near Threatened. This species was
uncommon in tropical dry forest and woodland. Two
singles and a pair were observed 3 km north-east of
Sipu on 18 December 2004; one was heard at Lake
Lendooen on 19 December 2004 giving an accelerat¬
ing series of hoo-wuk calls that diminished in volume
through the series; and a pair were seen at a fruiting fig
tree near Sipu. Black Cuckoo Dove has recently been
recorded from Jaco and Atauro island (Trainor and
Soares 2004) and occurs on Timor andWetar (Coates
and Bishop 1997). Although generally known to local
communities elsewhere, my guide from Sipu hamlet
had never seen Black Cuckoo Dove.
Timor Green Pigeon Treron psittacea
Restricted-range; Endangered. This species is appar¬
ently rare on Roti: one was recorded in a fruiting fig
tree, 2 km north-west of Sipu on 20 December 2004.
Known locally as ‘rekus’, the meat of Timor Green
Pigeon is regarded as delicious by local people, who
selectively target them. This is the first Roti record
since Verheijen collected a male near Baa in 1969
(Mees 1975).
Pink-headed Imperial Pigeon Ducula rosacea
Restricted-range; Near Threatened. This large pigeon
was generally uncommon, with several records daily of
singles and pairs. One bird was observed eating the
fruit of a Corypha sp. palm. This species is a major
target for hunters on the Tapuafu peninsula. The
imperial pigeon observed by Verheijen (1976) at Nusa
island was presumably this species.
[Beach Thick-knee Esacus neglectus
Near Threatened. One captured on Nusa island was
shown to Verheijen (1976), and he saw one other bird,
plus a group on the beach of Dengka. Johnstone and
Jepson (1996) reported five from Ndana island,
indicating that this species is locally common in the
area.]
Red-capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus
This species has long been considered an Australian
winter visitor (White and Bruce 1986, Coates and
Bishop 1997), but with at least 73 birds (usually paired
and in breeding plumage) recorded at several lakes,
and an estimated 100 birds observed around the Dead
Sea, it is probably resident on Roti. No nests were
discovered, but it does breed on Timor (Olsen and
Trainor 2005, Trainor 2005). Verheijen (1976)
observed a ‘pair of small plovers on Roti’ but was
unsure of their identity; these birds were possibly Red-
capped Plover.
Australasian Grebe Tachybaptus novaehollandiae
At least four birds showing the diagnostic yellow iris
and black neck of this species were recorded at Lake
Oendui on 22 December 2004, together with an
estimated 45 Little Grebes T. ruficollis. Australasian
Grebe is rare in the Lesser Sundas, with recent records
from Timor-Leste (Trainor 2005) and the Tanimbar
islands (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Darter Anhinga melanogaster
Near Threatened. This species was recorded relatively
frequently at the Tapuafu wetlands, with three males
and four females at Lake Oendui, and others present
on two other lakes (Table 1). These birds were of the
Australian race novaehollandiae'. males have a black
head with a long white stripe behind the eye, and
females have a white neck and chest.
Royal Spoonbill Platalea regia
A flock of 34-42 birds was observed on Lake Oendui.
Informants toldVerheijen (1976) that they had shot the
‘spoon-bird’ on the north and south coasts of Roti
(Verheijen 1976). There are few Lesser Sundas
records, but this species occurs regularly in the Timor
region (Trainor 2005).
124
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus
Groups of 10-50 birds were recorded throughout the
Tapuafu peninsula wetlands, with 68-101 birds
recorded at Lake Oendui and one bird at Lake Oeina
Lay. Local people stated that this species is present
year-round on the peninsula. In April-November
1981, 150-200 birds were noted at Lake Oendui (FAO
1982); five were seen at Pulau Ndana in August 1990
(Johnstone and Jepson 1996). This species is one of the
most regularly recorded waterbird visitors to Timor-
Leste (Trainor 2005). Its presence is apparently not
related to seasonal migrations or influxes ( contra Mayr
1944, Johnstone and Jepson 1996, Coates and Bishop
1997).
Elegant Pitta Pina elegans
This inconspicuous forest bird was considered uncon¬
firmed for Roti (White and Bruce 1986), based on a
local name given for the species by an informant to
Verheijen (1976). I found Elegant Pitta to be
widespread in forest, woodland and Lantana camara
shrubland, and remarkably abundant, frequently with
6-10 birds calling simultaneously at dusk and dawn.
The status of this bird in the Timor region is of
interest: it is uncommon in West Timor (Mayr 1944,
Noske and Saleh 1996) and has not yet been recorded
in Timor-Leste, to my knowledge.
Plain Gerygone Gerygone inornata
Restricted-range. This small passerine was widespread
but uncommon and rarely heard. One bird at Lake
Oendui had a cream chest and belly with a light grey
tint, and might have been a fledgling; Timor birds have
clean white underparts (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos
An immature bird taken by local people from a nest
(10 m high in a 30 m tall fig tree) on 18 December
2004 at Daurendale had a slate-blue iris and light
orange gape. Large-billed Crow was recorded daily,
but Johnstone and Jepson (1996) had just a single
record.
Olive-brown Oriole Oriolus melanotis
Restricted-range. This species was common in
woodland, villages and tropical dry forest, with up to
ten birds attending fruiting fig trees. Johnstone and
Jepson (1996) considered it to be scarce on Roti. This
species is endemic to Roti, Semau, Timor, Atauro
(Trainor and Soares 2004) andWetar.
Timor Figbird Sphecotheres viridis
Restricted-range. This species was widespread and
frequent in large fruiting trees in villages, woodland
and forest. It occurs on Roti, Semau and Timor
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Northern Fantail Rhipidura rufiventris
The distinctive race tenkatei (Biittikofer 1892) is
endemic to Roti and is characterised by a slate-grey
throat and breast with white streaks, compared to the
nominate race which has a white chin and throat.
Northern Fantail was unrecorded by Verheijen, but
considered uncommon in tropical dry forest and
mangrove by Johnstone and Jepson (1996). I found
this species to be frequent in all wooded habitats
including villages. Birds have a less upright perching
posture than Northern Fantail from northern Australia
or Timor, and more frequently occur in the under¬
storey at 1-5 m. On Timor, the species forages below
the canopy in habitats where it co-occurs with Rufous
Fantail R. rufifrons (Noske 1997), but this was not the
case on Roti. The contact call is similar to that reported
from Burn (Coates and Bishop 1997) and northern
Australia (Schodde and Tidemann 1988): a single or
double yip, reminiscent of yapping by Black-winged
Stilt Himantopus himantopus. The ‘sucking’ call of
rufiventris on Timor was not heard.
Orange-sided Thrush Zoothera peronii
Restricted-range; Near Threatened. The song of
Orange-sided Thrush provided an almost constant
background noise during the day in wooded habitats
(including dense shrubland with scattered trees)
throughout the Tapuafu peninsula. In contrast,
Johnstone and Jepson (1996) had three records. This
species is considered Near Threatened because of
heavy trapping in West Timor (BirdLife International
2004); there appears to be no trapping in northern
Roti. The racial identify of the Roti population is
unknown.
Timor Blue Flycatcher Cyomis hyacinthinus
Restricted-range. This distinctive flycatcher was
uncommon, with two observations of males at
Daurendale and Olokama, plus a few aural records.
There did not appear to be any morphological differ¬
ences from birds on mainland Timor. The call
structure was also similar, but calls seemed to be less
energetic. Timor Blue Flycatcher was first recorded
from Roti in 1993 (Johnstone and Jepson 1996) and is
otherwise known from Timor, Wetar and Semau.
White-bellied Bushchat Saxicola gutturalis
Restricted-range; Near Threatened. This species is
endemic to Timor, Semau (endemic race lactuosa ) and
Roti (previously known by a female collected by Ten
Kate in 1894: Mees 1975). It was common in
woodland, gaps in tropical dry forest, and mangrove
edge. Begging by fledglings (with an insect-like high
pitched buzzing) was frequently noted at Lake Oendui
(18 December 2004) and Olokama (21 December
2004). The call has a similar basic structure to that
given by Timor birds, with a series of rapidly whistled
notes, but the end of the call differs substantially
(comprising long squeaky whistles): further analysis of
calls and morphology may show that these birds repre¬
sent an endemic race. Urquhart and Bowley (2002)
stated that White-bellied Bushchat prefers different
habitat to Pied Bushchat 5. caprata , but the two species
often co-occurred on Roti. This species is abundant in
dry forest and secondary forest in Timor-Leste
(personal observations).
Timor Stubtail Urosphena subulata
Restricted-range. The tiny Timor Stubtail was
observed only once, but calls were heard widely in
tropical dry forest, woodland and shrubland: a single
high pitched pseeeeee then blip .. .blip .. .blip and a rapid
high pitched trill. This are the first Roti records. The
Forktail 21 (2005)
Birds ofTapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
125
Table 2. Counts of waterbirds at inland lakes on theTapuafu peninsula, Roti. Maximum counts are given for Lake Oendui.
species is otherwise known from Timor, Wetar and
Babar (Coates and Bishop 1997) and was recently
added to the avifauna of Atauro island (Trainor and
Soares 2004).
Timor Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus presbytes
Restricted-range. This species was frequent in
woodland and tropical dry forest throughout the
Tapuafu peninsula. The breezy, rising and falling
whistle given by Roti birds sounded similar to that of
birds on Timor. The species is also found on Timor,
Flores and Atauro (Trainor and Soares 2004).
Red-chested Flowerpecker Dicaeum maugei
Restricted-range. This species was widespread and
frequent in wooded habitats.
Flame-breasted Sunbird Nectarinia solans
Restricted-range. This sunbird was widespread and
common through all wooded habitats including
villages, but it was considered ‘scarce’ by Johnstone
and Jepson (1996).
126
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
DISCUSSION
The observations presented here greatly improve our
knowledge of Rod’s avifauna. The new species
included the globally threatened Yellow-crested
Cockatoo, four restricted-range species, seven migrant
waders and eight other waterbirds. The addition of
many new island records, including resident forest
birds, was unexpected following surveys by Mees
(1975), Verheijen (1976) and Johnstone and Jepson
(1996). However, there were many differences between
the earlier surveys and the present one in terms of field
effort (location, time of year etc.), and there may be
more natural forest and wetlands on the northern
Tapuafu peninsula than in the other areas of Roti
which were the focus of earlier surveys. Verheijen
(1976) accurately stated that ‘further collecting in
special habitats... in the wooded area of Landu...,
might have resulted in a doubling of the number of
species collected [or recorded]’. The potential impor¬
tance of the Tapuafu area had been highlighted by
FAO/UNDP in 1982, and it was unfortunate that the
area had not been surveyed until now.
The avifauna of Roti island forms a subset of that of
neighbouring Timor, with all bar two of the species
known from Roti occurring on Timor: Johnstone and
Jepson (1996) recorded Black-naped Oriole Oriolus
chinensis and Red-headed Honeyeater Myzomela
erythocephala. The closest populations of both species
are on Sumba. Neither was recorded during the
present survey, but after viewing paintings, local people
suggested that they were present and uncommon in the
Daurendale area. Three additional species have
recently been added to Timor’s avifauna: Green
Pygmy-goose, Hardhead Aythya australis and Pale¬
headed Munia Lonchura pallida (Trainor 2005,Trainor
et al. in press.). Few other passerines known from the
island went unrecorded. Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike
Coracina novaehollandiae is an austral winter migrant
from Australia and would not be expected in
December. Short-tailed Starling Aplonis minor is
known from a single specimen (Johnstone and Jepson
1996) and might be an occasional visitor, moving
nomadically in search of fruit. Only two of seven
finches were recorded, undoubtedly because of the
limited extent of open savanna, grassland and ricefields
in the Tapuafu peninsula.
The records of 17 bird species in Verheijen (1976)
were based on anecdotal information from informants
(12 species) or his own observations where identifica¬
tion was uncertain. Seven of these species have not
been confirmed by subsequent observations or collec¬
tion, but are likely to be present. These are:
Blue-breasted Quail Coturnix chinensis , Island Collared
Dove Streptopelia bitorquata, snipe sp. (perhaps
Swinhoe’s Snipe Gallinago megala ), Osprey Pandion
haliaetus, Australian Hobby Falco longipennis. Black
Bittern Dupetor flavicollis and Timor Sparrow Lonchura
fuscata (these species are listed in the appendix as
unconfirmed).
Both of the globally threatened species recorded on
Roti are unsurprisingly also under threat on the island,
with their populations probably greatly limited by
capture for trade (Yellow-crested Cockatoo) or hunting
(Timor Green Pigeon). Verheijen (1976) stated that
Yellow-crested Cockatoo ‘certainly occur [s] on Roti’,
but he did not record any directly. BirdLife
International (2001) suggested that Roti should be
targeted for surveys of the species. Cockatoos are
known by local communities throughout the penin¬
sula, and are hunted after orders are placed by dealers.
There are no specialist bird-trappers on the island, but
fishermen and farmers may opportunistically catch
cockatoos when there is demand. Local people said
that flocks of up to 20 birds could be seen in the ‘corn
season’ around agricultural crops. Yellow-crested
Cockatoo is now very rare in West Timor, where there
have been few records in the past decade (Lesmana et
al. 2000), but there are many isolated flocks in Timor-
Leste (Trainor and Mauro in prep).
Timor Green Pigeon and Black Cuckoo Dove
(along with Pink-headed Imperial Pigeon and Emerald
Dove Chalcophaps indica) are the main target of
hunters on the peninsula. On Roti, the green pigeon
has been recorded twice, and is probably rare. There
are similarly few records from West Timor (BirdLife
International 2001). The species calls irregularly, but
appears naive and often perches for long periods in the
canopy (presumably congregating around fruiting fig
trees, which are well known by hunters), rendering it
easy to shoot. The cuckoo dove was recorded at a
relatively high rate comparable with that on Timor-
Leste (Trainor and Mauro in prep). More fieldwork is
needed on Roti to better understand the status of both
of these species.
There are many taxonomic challenges among the
poorly known bird faunas ofWallacean islands (White
and Bruce 1986, Coates and Bishop 1997). Given the
narrow distance between Roti and Timor, little differ¬
entiation would be expected between populations of
the same species on Roti and Timor. However, the
calls, and in some instances appearance, of several
species on Roti differ somewhat from those on Timor,
and may be worth further study. The Roti race of
Southern Boobook is also noteworthy, being highly
distinctive based on DNA sequencing (R. Johnstone in
litt. 2005).
Waterbird populations on the Tapuafu peninsula and
the saline and freshwater lakes that support them are of
high regional significance. As mentioned by Johnstone
and Jepson (1996), Roti lies on the East
Asia-Australasian flyway for migratory waders. Total
waterbird counts are generally low, but several species
obviously overwinter on Roti (see Table 2 and
Appendix); for other ‘transient’ species, these wetlands
are important for resting and feeding. The area is the
typical south-eastern limit for three migrant shorebirds
(Common Redshank Tringa totanus, Long-toed Stint
Calidris subminuta and Little Ringed Plover Charadrius
dubius) that are relatively rarely reported in Australia
(Barrett et al. 2003). Counts of Sharp-tailed
Sandpipers Calidris acwnuiata were among the highest
for the Timor region (Trainor 2005). The region
supports relatively high numbers of visitors (e.g.
Australian Pelican), and of resident species such as
grebes, cormorants, egrets, night herons and ducks.
The Kupang Bay and Mina River wetlands (Andrew
1986) lie about 60-80 km north of Roti and undoubt¬
edly form a regionally important and diverse
interconnected wetland system. In addition, Ashmore
Forktail 21 (2005)
Birds ofTapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
127
Reef (a Ramsar-listed wetland) lies only 145 km south
of Roti. The conservation recommendations of
FAO/UNDP (1982) have not been acted upon, but my
observations indicate that the area retains high natural
values.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The hospitality of the Johannis family of Sotimori village was much
appreciated. Thanks to Niven McCrie for confirming the presence of
Brush Cuckoo from a recording. Danny Rogers viewed my video of
an unusually long-billed stint and confirmed it as Red-necked Stint.
Thanks to Rudyanto of BirdLife Asia for preparing the map, and to
Ed Colijn for providing a copy ofVerheijen (1976) and for reviewing
the sources of many records. Finally, thanks to Ron Johnstone for
reviewing this paper.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P. (1986) Notes on some birds ofTimor. Kukila 2: 92-95.
Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Barry, S., Cunningham, R. and Poulter, R.
(2003) The new atlas of Australian Birds. Hawthorne East,
Australia: Royal Australian Ornithological Union.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2005) Species factsheet: Turacoena modesta.
Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 6 March 2005.
Btittikofer, J. (1892) On a collection of birds from the islands of
Flores, Sumba and Rotti. Notes Leyden Mus. 15: 193-207.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds ofWallacea.
Alderley, Australia: Dove Publications.
FAO/UNDP (1982) National conservation plan for Indonesia. 4: Nusa
Tenggara. Bogor, Indonesia: Food and Agriculture Organisation
of the United Nations (Field Report 44).
Inskipp, T, Lindsey, N., and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Johnstone, R. E. and Darnell, J. C. (1997) Description of a new
subspecies of Boobook Owl Ninox novaeseelandiae (Gmelin)
from Roti Island, Indonesia. W. Austr. Naturalist 21: 161-173.
Johnstone, R. E. and Jepson, P. (1996) The birds of Roti island, Nusa
Tenggara, Indonesia. W Austr. Naturalist 21: 23-35.
Lesmana, D, Trainor, C. and Gatur, A. (2000) Arti periling hatan di
daratan Timor bagian barat: telaah awal informasi keanekaragaman
hayati dan sosial ekonomi di Pulau Timor (Propinsi Nusa Tenggara
Timur). [‘ The importance of forest areas in West Timor: a review
of biodiversity and socio-economic information based on rapid
surveys’] Bogor: Perlindungan dan Konservasi Alam/BirdLife
International/WWF, Report No 13. (In Indonesian.)
Mayr, E. (1944) The birds ofTimor and Sumba. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat.
Hist. 83: 126-194.
Mees, G. F. (1975) A list of the birds known from Roti and adjacent
islets (Lesser Sunda Islands) Zool. Meded. 49: 1 15-140.
Monk, K. A., de Fretes, Y. and Lilley, G. (1997) The ecology of Nusa
Tenggara and Maluku. Singapore: Periplus Editions.
Noske, R. A. (1997) The ecology ofTimor birds. Pp. 353-362 in K.
A. Monk, Y. de Fretes and G. Lilley. The ecology of Nusa Tenggara
and Maluku. Singapore: Periplus Editions.
Noske, R. A. and Saleh, N. (1996) The conservation status of forest
birds in WestTimor. Pp. 65-74 in D. Kitchener and A. Suyanto,
eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Eastern
Indonesian-Australian Vertebrate Fauna, Manado, Indonesia,
November 22-26, 1994.
Trainor, C. R. (2005) Waterbirds and coastal seabirds ofTimor-Leste
(East Timor): status and distribution from surveys in August
2002-December 2004. Forktail 21: 61-78.
Trainor, C. R. and Mauro, I. (in prep.) Status of globally threatened
and forest birds in Timor-Leste (East Timor).
Trainor, C. R. and Soares, T. (2004) Birds of Atauro Island, Timor-
Leste (EastTimor). Forktail 20: 41-48.
Trainor, C. R. Benstead, P., Martin, K., Lesmana, D., Agista, D.,
Benstead, M. C., Drijvers, R., and Setiawan, I. (in press) New
bird records for Nusa Tenggara Islands: Sumbawa, Moyo,
Sumbawa, Sumba, Flores, Pulau Besar and Timor. Kukila 13.
Verheijen, J. A. J. (1976). Some data on the avifauna of the island of
Roti, Lesser Sunda Islands. Zool. Meded. 50: 1-21.
Urquhart, E. and Bowley, A. (2002) Stonechats: a guide to the genus
Saxicola. London: Christopher Helm.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds ofWallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands Indonesia. An
annotated checklist. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Checklist no. 7).
Colin R. Trainor, BirdLife International, and Tropical Savannas Management Cooperative Research Centre, Charles
Darwin University 0909, Northern Territory, Australia. Email: colin.trainor@cdu.edu.au
128
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
Birds ofTapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
129
130
COLIN R. TRAINOR
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005)
Birds ofTapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia
131
Key
Status
RR=Restricted-range (<50,000 krrr: Stattersfield et al. 1998).
R=Resident
M=Migrant
F=Forest-dependent
V=Vagrant
CR=Critically Endangered
EN=Endangered
VU= Vulnerable
NT =Near Threatened
Records:
K=Ten Kate (1891-1893)
V=Verheijen (1976)
J=Johnstone and Jepson (1996)
T=present survey. New island records are denoted with an asterisk.
Unconfirmed records are included in square brackets
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 133-138
Distribution and population trends of the ‘black
shaheen5 Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
peregrinator and the eastern Peregrine Falcon
F. p. calidus in Sri Lanka
HERMANN DOTTLINGER and MIKE NICHOLLS
A total of 232 historical sight records from 1876 onwards, including records from field surveys from 1995 to 2000, of two Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus subspecies in Sri Lanka were used to assess their geographical distribution, seasonal occurrence and popula¬
tion trends. Eastern Peregrine Falcon F. p. calidus and ‘black shaheen’ Peregrine Falcon F. p. peregrinator showed significantly different
distributions. F. p. calidus is a winter visitor inhabiting mainly coastal areas from October to March, whereas the resident F. p. peregri¬
nator is largely confined to the central part of the island. Sightings from 1944 onwards for the two subspecies show similar population
trends to peregrine populations elsewhere, with declines presumably driven by the use organochloride and organophosphate pesti¬
cides. F. p. peregrinator populations declined until the mid-1970s when DDT was banned, correlating positively with the incidence of
malaria infections, and appear to have now recovered to pre-DDT levels. F. p. calidus populations declined less steeply until the early
1980s, and have increased gradually since then, but apparently not yet to pre-DDT levels.
INTRODUCTION
Although few specific data are available the ‘black
shaheen’ Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus peregrinator
is an apparently rare, breeding resident in Sri Lanka,
preferring rocky outcrops over forest areas (Wait 1931,
Henry 1971, Cade 1982, Brown and Amadon 1989,
Weick 1989, Lamsfuss 1998, Dottlinger 2002). The
national red data list classified the subspecies as
‘vulnerable’ (Hoffmann 1998). This status is concor¬
dant with a population estimated to number 63-82
breeding pairs (Dottlinger and Hoffmann 1999,
Dottlinger 2002). It is assumed that the population has
always been numerically small. Tropical raptors tend to
have smaller populations than temperate species
(Newton 1979, Deshmukh 1986).
In Sri Lanka, sight records of F. p. peregrinator may
be confused with eastern Peregrine Falcon F. p. calidus,
so estimates of the status of F. p. peregrinator have been
unclear. F. p. calidus is apparently a winter visitor to Sri
Lanka in small numbers from October to March
(Henry 1971, Phillips 1975, Lamsfuss 1998). Both
subspecies prey upon birds (Cade 1982, Cade et al.
1988, Brown and Amadon 1989). The competitive
exclusion principle (Hardin 1960) would predict that
wintering calidus peregrines might be expected to avoid
food competition with F. p. peregrinator by, for example,
habitat segregation (Deshmukh 1986).
The Ceylon Bird Club Notes (CBCN) are a useful
source of information on the status and distribution of
birds in Sri Lanka. These notes have been published
monthly since 1944 and are mainly based on sight
records by amateur birdwatchers (Lamsfuss 1998).
Although amateurs’ records are unsystematic and non-
random, they have nonetheless proved invaluable in
detecting long-term trends in North American raptor
populations (Bildstein 1998). This paper therefore
aims to evaluate the information published in CBCN
and other sources in order to determine the distribu¬
tion and trends of F. p. peregrinator and F. p. calidus.
METHODS
A total of 232 records of both subspecies during
1876-1999 was collected, comprising 68 records of F.
p. calidus from CBCN and 164 records of F. p. peregri¬
nator (119 from CBCN, ten from other literature
sources, four from museum specimens and 31 from
field surveys during 1995-1999: Dottlinger et al. 1999,
Dottlinger 2002). Field surveys were carried out
annually from 1995 to 1999. Peregrine Falcons were
searched for in all habitats outside protected areas
from the roadside along 1,000-2,000 km of roads each
year. From 17 March to 4 April 1995, road transects
were driven from Colombo via Sigiriya towards
Polonnaruwa district, covering the east cost from
Eastern province to Uva province, returning to
Colombo through Central province. During 7 April-7
May 1996, 12 May-15 June 1997, 6 March-11 April
1998, 6 March- 1 1 April 1999 and 28 February-13
March 2000, surveys were made in Western province,
Southern province and northern Central province
(Eastern province was not accessible owing to the
security situation). Multiple records in the vicinity of a
nest site were treated as a single location in the analysis
of distribution.
In seven CBCN records where the observers
reported merely ‘peregrine’, this was assumed to refer
to F. p. calidus, as according to T. W. Hoffmann (in litt.
2004), ‘peregrine’ is used exclusively for this
subspecies and ‘shaheen’ is used for F. p. peregrinator.
Some difficulty was encountered in determining the
locations of older records. For these, clarification was
sought through the ‘Oriental birding’ and ‘Indian
Natural History’ discussion groups. In addition, we
used the GEOnet Names Server, which provides
access to the National Imagery and Mapping Agency
database of foreign geographic feature names
(http://164.214. 2. 59/gns/html/index.html).
Coordinates were determined for all except two
locations (Kumbaqumia hill and Mahalla). A metric
134
HERMANN DOTTLINGER and MIKE NICHOLLS
Forktail 21 (2005)
grid frame was used to cover Sri Lanka, setting zero on
the x and y axes to 06"N 79°E. For fix-plotting, the
converted values were entered in RANGES V Analysis
Software (Kenward 1987, Kenward and Walls 1994,
Walls and Kenward 1994). Where there were multiple
records at the same location, these were grouped on a
monthly basis, providing one record per month per
location, both for the mapping and subsequent
analysis. Three records could not be assigned to a
month and were discared from the seasonal analysis.
Distribution
To investigate the distribution of the two subspecies,
Sri Lanka was subdivided into three zones (Fig. 1): (a)
The coastal zone (20,000 km2), extending from the
coast to 50 m elevation, and consisting of marshes,
sand bars, peninsulas, dunes, mangroves and lagoons.
In the south-west, the coastal zone is sufficiently
narrow that it can effectively be considered part of the
central zone; (b) The central zone (44,900 km2), lying
at 50-500 m, including a south-western region well-
watered by summer and winter monsoons, an eastern
and south-eastern region of plains, dotted with isolated
hills, and a northern lowland plain at 50-100 m, all of
which were heavily forested until recently; and (c) The
mountain zone/central highlands (667 km2), lying
above 500 m, bounded in the south by the southern
mountain wall and in the north by the transverse valley
of the Mahaweli river. There are two ranges detached
from the central massif: the Knuckles range in the
north and the Rakwana massif in the south-west.
Analysis
Analysis of occurrence and assignment of occupied
area was performed with RANGES V software
(Kenward 1987). The significance of distributional
differences between the two subspecies in the different
zones was tested using a x2 test (Lamprecht 1992).
Sight records are non-random, unsystematically
collected data, and so moving average models were
used in order to reduce the error variance of sightings
for examining long-term trends (Precht and Kraft
1992). In these models, single exponential smoothing
gives predicted values by computing exponentially
weighted averages. The single dynamic component in a
moving average model is the exponentially weighted
average of all data up to time t. Measures of accuracy
of the fitted model are indicated by minimal values for
Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The
number of sight records was numerically low and most
likely related to the number of active birdwatchers.
Therefore, a relative measure of abundance was
derived using the ratio of predicted records (derived
from the model above) to the number of active
birdwatchers for a given time period, as estimated byT.
W. Hoffmann {in lilt. 2004). Similar types of ratios
have proved to be useful tools for relative population
comparisons (Peterson 1995, Bildstein 1998). To
determine population trends, this ratio was regressed
against date.
RESULTS
Distribution and seasonal occurrence
Of 232 sight records from 1876-2000, 29% were of F.
p. calidus and 71% were of F. p. peregrinator. Records
came from 100 different locations (Fig. 1, Table 2).
The overall distribution of records of the two
subspecies was significantly different (x2=36.06,
DF=2, P<0.001). Most locations of records of F. p.
peregrinator (59%) fell within the central zone, with
12% in the coastal zone and 29% in the mountain
zone. In contrast, most locations of records of F. p.
calidus (71%) fell in the coastal zone, with 11% in the
mountain zone and 17% in the central zone. Range
analysis showed that 95% of F. p. calidus records fell in
an area of 14,830 km2, predominantly in the coastal
area (Fig. la), and 95% of E p. peregrinator records fell
in an area of 39,400 km2 of the central zone (Fig. lb).
The majority of F. p. calidus records were from southern
coastal areas (e.g. Bundala, Yala and Uda Walawe
National Parks, and Kalametiya and Kumana Bird
Sanctuaries), which are popular with birdwatchers
during migration periods. F. p. calidus records were
mainly from October-March, whereas F. p. peregrinator
records were from throughout the year (Fig. 2).
Long-term trends
Fig. 3 shows the pattern of records over time for both
subspecies during 1944-1 998. The smoothed trend for
F. p. peregrinator shows an increase from 1975 onwards,
whereas the trend for F. p. calidus is level. However, the
accuracy of the moving average plots is low for both F.
p. peregrinator (Fig. 3a; MAPE=47.4%) and F. p. calidus
(Fig. 3b; MAPE=44.5%) and so must be interpreted
with caution. Furthermore, there was an increase in
the number of active observers through the period,
from six in 1944 to 25 ini 997 (T.W. Hoffmann in litt.
2004). The number of records showed a significant
positive correlation with the number of observers
(Pearson correlation: r - 0.408, P = 0.002), so the ratio
of the predicted number of sightings to number of
observers was calculated for each year to produce a
measure of relative abundance. Regression of relative
abundance against year for F. p. peregrinator showed
that it declined from 1944 until the 1970s and then
increased (Fig. 4a). The pattern for F. p. calidus was
similar, falling until the 1980s with very gradual
increase into the 1990s (Fig. 4b).
DISCUSSION
The CBCN records are a valuable and unique source
of data on birds in Sri Lanka, but a number of limita¬
tions and biases must be acknowledged: (1) the
majority of records are from areas and locations
favoured by birdwatchers (e.g. Sigiriya); (2) from 1983
onwards, visits to the north and the east of Sri Lanka
became difficult or impossible owing to armed conflict
(Domros 1993, Lamsfuss 1998), leading to under¬
representation of data for these areas during this
period; (3) seasonal variation in the cqnspicuousness of
F. p. peregrinator probably influences the number of
observations: there were many records in
February-March during the early courtship and pre-
Forktail 21 (2005)
Distribution of ‘black shaheen’ and eastern Peregrine Falcons in Sri Lanka
135
laying period, fewer during the incubation period in
March-April, more during ApriLMay when pre- and
post-fledged young are dependent, and fewer after May
when young gain independence.
Figure 1 (a) The locations (n=35) of 68 records of F. p.
calidus ; and (b) the locations (n=65) of 164 records of F. p.
peregrinator. Pale, moderate and dark shading indicate the
coastal, central and mountain zones respectively.
The data corroborate previous authors (Wait 1931,
Henry 1971, Weick 1980, Cade 1982, Brown and
Amadon 1 989, Lamsfuss 1995, 1998) that F. p. peregri¬
nator is resident in Sri Lanka and occurs inland in
forested areas rather than coastal territories. By
contrast, F. p. calidus is a winter visitor from October to
March being observed mainly at coastal sites. This
25 -i
20 -j
Jan Feb Mar Apr Mai Jun Jid Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Figure 2. The pattern of seasonal occurrence of records of F.
p. calidus (N=62 records; solid bars) and F. p. peregrinator (N=
1 19 records; open bars).
Figure 3. Actual records (squares, solid line) and predicted
values (triangles, dashed line) for (a) F. p. peregrinator and (b)
F. p. calidus from 1944 to 1998; predicted values are generated
by a moving average function with single exponential
smoothing.
136
HERMANN DOTTLINGER and MIKE NICHOLLS
Forktail 21 (2005)
Figure 4. Regression of the ratio of predicted number of
records to active birdwatchers against year, for (a) F. p.
peregrinator and (b) F. p. calidus from 1944 to 1998. Dotted
lines show the 95% confidence limits.
apparent segregation may be a way in which the two
subspecies avoid competition for food (Deshmukh
1986). Studies of other peregrine populations have
generally found that migratory northern hemisphere
races winter in coastal regions and avoid intrusion into
the territories of resident populations (Hunt and Ward
1988, Dobler and Spencer 1989, Thiollay 1989, White
et al. 1989).
Accounting for observer effort, the data suggest
that the F. p. peregrinator population declined from
1944 until the mid-1970s and then increased until
1998 at least. By comparison, the population of F. p.
calidus seems to have declined slowly until the early
1980s and then gradually recovered subsequently. The
minimum population for F. p. calidus was reached about
ten years after that of F. p. peregrinator. The population
of F. p. peregrinator appears to have reached 1 950s levels
again, but the population of F. p. calidus seems to still be
lower.
It is widely accepted that worldwide declines of
Peregrine Falcon populations in recent decades were
caused by the use of organochloride and organophos-
phate pesticides (Hickey and Anderson 1968, Bitman
et al. 1969, Hickey and Anderson 1969, White and
Figure 5. Number of malaria infections in Sri Lanka
between 1940 and 1986 (data from Sponsler 2000). Dotted
lines show the 95% confidence limits.
Cade 1977, Ratcliffe 1980, Cade et al. 1988, Peakall
and Kiff 1988, Mellanby 1992). The intake of these
pesticides occurs via contaminated prey items, often
accumulated in the food chain (Fyfe et al. 1988, Nisbet
1988). From 1946, the organochloride insecticide
DD'F became available in Sri Lanka when the govern¬
mental anti-malaria campaign developed an
eradication programme of the insect vectors using
DDT. During the 1950s and 1960s, DDT and BHC
(another organochloride) were also widely used in the
cultivation of rice and vegetables (Gerberg and Wilcox
III 1977). In 1.977, DDT spraying for malaria control
was banned in Sri Lanka, (Department of Census and
Statistics 1977, Kondrashin and Rashid 1987) and the
importation and use of DDT and similar persistent
insecticides was prohibited. The recovery of F. p.
peregrinator populations coincided with this ban. A
similar phenomenom was found with F. p. peregrinus in
Britain, where the population recovered from a low
point in the 1970s following step-by-step restrictions
imposed on organochlorinated insecticides (Ratcliffe
1980). Further evidence of a link between population
trends and the use of organochlorine pesticides for
malaria control is provided by the significant positive
correlation between the relative abundance of F. p.
peregrinator and the number of reported cases of
malaria in Sri Lanka during 1942-1988 (Fig. 5;
r=0.765, P<0.005). There was no such significant
correlation for F. p. calidus (i— 0.341, P=0.081). This
subspecies may have been less exposed to pesticides on
its breeding grounds in Siberia than F. p. peregrinator is
in Sri Lanka. Data on the effects of pesticides on
migrant Peregrine Falcon populations are extremely
rare (Ratcliffe 1980, Cade et al. 1988). However, birds
from Alaska which winter in Central and South
America also showed delayed effects of DDT (White
and Cade 1977). Similarly, data from Finland show
that pesticide-induced declines varied with geography.
Peregrine Falcons in the south of Finland nearly disap¬
peared by the early 1970s, while populations in the
north of Finland declined by only 50% (Lindberg et al.
1988, Peakall and Kiff 1988). Falcons may still be
Forktail 21 (2005)
Distribution of ‘black shaheen’ and eastern Peregrine Falcons in Sri Lanka
137
exposed to DDT in Sri Lanka: between April 1998 and
January 1999, India exported 186,000 kg of DDT and
213,000 kg of aldrin to various countries including Sri
Lanka (Toxic Link 1999), but the quantities to each
country cannot be determined.
Recent habitat changes in Sri Lanka may have also
influenced Peregrine Falcon populations. From the
late 1970s, the major Mahaweli Development Project
was implemented, resulting in the clear-felling of over
4,000 km; of forest for rice and sugar-cane cultivation
(OED Precis 1995, Lamsfuss 1996a,b). Forest cover in
Sri Lanka has subsequently declined to <20% of the
area. Habitat loss may have limited the recovery of F. p.
peregrinator populations. Alternatively it is conceivable
that fragmentation may have had a positive effect by
increasing prey availability and accessibility. This has
apparently been the case in the Stellenbosch area of
South Africa where populations of F. p. minor appear to
have benefited from the establishment of small
homestead agriculture in an otherwise semi-arid
habitat, with associated increases in dove populations
(Peplar et al. 1991, Peplar and Martin 1994). Further
research on hunting habitat selection in F. p. peregrina¬
tor is needed to test these possibilities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are very grateful to T. W. Hoffmann, W. P. Abeydeera, G.
Lamsfuss, the Ceylon Bird Club, Department for Wildlife and
Conservation in Sri Lanka, A. Baur & Co (Travels) Ltd, the staff of
the Natural History Museum, Tring and the Bombay Natural
History Museum; Anita Gamauf (Naturhistorisches Museum
Vienna) and David Peplar (Forestry Department, University of
Stellenbosch). For sponsoring parts of the study thanks are due to
Elmar-Schlogel-Stiftung, Deutscher Falkenorden, and K. H.
Gersmann.
REFERENCES
Bildstein, K. L. (1998) Long-term counts of migrating raptors: a role
for volunteers in wildlife research. J. Wildl. Manage. 62: 435-445.
Bitman, J., Cecil, H. C., Harris, S. J. and Gries, G. F. (1969) DDT
induces a decrease in eggshell calcium. Nature 224: 44-46.
Brown, L. and Amadon, D. (1989) Eagles, hawks and falcons of the
world. Secaucus: Wellfleet Press.
Cade, T. J. (1982) The falcons of the world. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell
University Press.
Cade,T. J., Enderson, J. H.,Thelander, C. G. and White, C. M., eds
(1988) Peregrine falcon populations — their management and
recovery. Boise, ID: Peregrine Fund.
Department of Census and Statistics (1977) Sri Lanka Yearbook
1977. Colombo: Ministry of Plan and Implementation.
Deshmukh, I. (1986) Ecology and tropical biology. London: Blackwell
Scientific Publications.
Dobler, F. C. and Spencer, R. D. (1989) Wintering Peregrine Falcon
Falco peregrinus, habitat utilization in Grays Harbour,
Washington. Pp. 71-78 in B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor,
eds. Raptors of the modern world. London: World Working Group
on Birds of Prey and Owls.
Domros, M. (1993) Sri Lanka mit Malediven. Munchen: Polyglott.
Dotdinger, H. (2002) The Black Shaheen Falcon ( Falco peregrinus
peregrinator Sundevall 1837) its morphology, geographic varia¬
tion and the history and ecology of the Sri Lanka (Ceylon)
population. Ph.D. thesis. University of Kent, U.K.
Dotdinger, H. and Hoffmann, T. W. (1999) Status of the Black
Shaheen or Indian Peregrine Falcon ( Falco peregrinus peregrina¬
tor ) in Sri Lanka. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc 96 (2): 239-243.
Dotdinger, H., Nicholls, M. K. and Attapattu, N. (1999) The Black
Shaheen ( Falco peregrinus peregrinator) in Sri Lanka - a report of
the 1997 field season. Falco 13: 15-18.
Fyfe, R. W., Risebrough, R. W., Monk, J. G., Jarman, W. M.,
Anderson, D. W., Kiff, F. L., Lincer, J. L., Nisbet, C.T., Walker
II, W. and Walton, B. J. (1988) DDE, productivity, and eggshell
thickness relationships in the genus Falco. Pp. 319-335 in T. J.
Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander and C. M. White, eds.
Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery. Boise,
ID: Peregrine Fund.
Gerberg, E. J. and Wilcox III, H. (1977) Environmental assessment
of malaria and control projects - Sri Lanka. Agency Internal.
Bevel. 20: 32-33.
Hardin, G. (1960) The competive exclusion principle. Science 113:
1292-1297.
Henry, G. M. (1971) A guide to the birds of Ceylon. 2nd edition.
London: Oxford University Press.
Hickey, J. J. and Anderson, D. W. (1968) Chlorinated hydrocarbons
and eggshell changes in raptorial and fish-eating birds. Science
162: 271-273.
Hickey, J. J. and Anderson, D. W. (1969) The Peregrine Falcon: life
history and population literature. Pp. 3-42 in J. J. Hickey, ed.
Peregrine Falcon populations , Madison: University of Wisconsin
Press.
Hoffmann, T. W. (1998) Threatened birds of Sri Lanka: national red list.
Special Publication Series No. 3. Colombo: Ceylon Bird Club,
del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. and Saragatal, J. (1994) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol 2. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Hunt, W. G. and Ward, F. P. (1988) Habitat selection by spring
migrant Peregrines at Padre Island, Texas. Pp. 527-535 in T. J.
Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander and C. M. White, eds.
Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery. Boise,
ID: Peregrine Fund.
Kenward, R. (1987) Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques,
and data analysis. London: Academic Press.
Kenward, R. E. and Walls, S. S. (1994) The systematic study of
radio-tagged raptors: I. survival, home-range and habitat-use.
Pp. 303-315 in B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptor
conservation today. Robertsbridge, U. K.: Pica Press.
Kondrashin, A. V. and Rashid, K. M. (1987) Epidemiological consid¬
eration for planning malaria control in the WHO South-East
Asia region. New Delhi: WHO Regional Office for South-East
Asia.
Lamprecht, J. (1992) Biologische Forschung. Hamburg: Paul Parey.
Lamsfuss, G. (1995) Die Vogel Sri Lankas und der Malediven
einschliefilich denen der Lakkadiven und des Chagos-Archiples.
Darmstadt: G. Lamsfuss.
Lamsfuss, G. (1996a) Die Vogel Sri Lankas, eine vollstandige Arten-
und Checkliste fiirVogelbeobachter. Colombo: Ceylon Bird Club.
Lamsfuss, G. (1996b) Evaluation of the Ceylon Bird Club Notes:
Falconidae. Unpublished report.
Lamsfuss, G. (1998) Die Vogel Sri Lankas - Fin Vogel und NaturfiThrer.
Heidelberg: Kasparek Verlag.
Lindberg, R, Schei, P. J. and Wickmann, M. (1988) The Peregrine
Falcon in Fennoscandia. Pp. 156-172 in T. J. Cade, J. H.
Enderson, C. G. Thelander and C. M. White, eds. Peregrine
Falcon populations: their management and recovery. Boise, ID:
Peregrine Fund.
Mellanby, K. (1992) The DDT story. London: British Crop
Protection Council.
Newton, I. (1979) Population ecology of raptors. London: T. & A. D.
Poyser.
Nisbet, C.T. (1988) The relative importance of DDE and Dieldrm
in the decline of Peregrine Falcon populations. Pp. 351-375 in
T. J. Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander and C. M. White,
eds. Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery.
Boise, ID: Peregrine Fund.
OED Precis (1995) Sri Lanka: Mahaweli Ganga dvelopment,
Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank. OED Precis 86.
Peakall, D. B. and Kiff, F. L. (1988) DDE contamination in
Peregrines and American Kestrels and its effects on reproduc¬
tion. Pp. 337-350 inT. J. Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander
and C. M. White, eds. Peregrine Falcon populations: their manage¬
ment and recovery. Boise, ID: Peregrine Fund.
138
HERMANN DOTTLINGER and MIKE NICHOLLS
Forktail 21 (2005)
Peplar, D. and Martin, R. (1994) Der Status des Wanderfalken und
Lannerfalken in der sudwestlichen Kap Province, Stidafrika.
Greifvdgel and Falkenrei 1994: 1 15-1 17.
Peplar, D., van Hensbergen, H. J. and Martin, H. J. (1991) Breeding
density and nest site characteristics of the Peregrine Falcon
(Falco peregrinus minor) in the southwestern Cape, South Africa.
Ostrich 62: 23-28.
Peterson, A. P. (1995) Erroneous party-hour data and a proposed
method of correcting observer effort in Christmas bird counts. J.
Field Ornithol. 66: 385-390.
Phillips, W. W. A. (1975) A 1975 annotated checklist of the birds of
Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Colombo: Wildlife and Nature Protection
Society of Ceylon.
Precht, M. and Kraft, R. (1992) Bio-Statistik 1. Munchen: R.
Oldenburg.
Ratcliffe, D. A. (1980) The peregrine falcon. Vermillion, South Dakota:
Buteo Books.
Thiollay, J.-M. (1989) Distribution and ecology of Palearctic birds of
prey wintering in west and central Africa. Pp. 95-107 in B.-U.
Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptors of the modern world.
London: World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls.
Toxic Link (1999) Status of persistent organic pollutants (POP) in
India. Toxic Link Newsl. 8.
Wait, W. E. (1931) Manual of the birds of Ceylon. 2nd. ed. London:
Dulau & Co.
Walls, S. S. and Kenward, R. E. (1994) The systematic study of
radio-tagged raptors: II. sociality and dispersal. Pp. 317-324 in
B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptor conservation
today. Robertsbridge, U. K.: Pica Press.
Weick, F. (1980) Die Greifvdgel der Welt: ein farbiger Fiihrer zur
Bestimmung der Ordnung Falconiformes. Flamburg: Verlag Paul
Parey.
Weick, F. (1989) Zur Taxonomie des Wanderfalken Falco peregrinus
Tunstall 1771. Beiheft zur Okologie Vogel 1.
White, C. M. and Cade, T. J. (1977) Long term trend in Peregrine
populations in Alaska. Pp. 63-72 in R. D. Chancellor, eds.
Proceedings of the ICBP world conference on birds of Prey. London:
International Council for Bird Preservation.
White, C. M., Risebrough, R. W. and Temple, S. A. (1989)
Observations on North American breeding Peregrines Falco
peregrinus on the non-breeding grounds in South America. Pp.
89-93 in B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptors of the
modern world. London: World Working Group on Birds of Prey
and Owls.
Hermann Dottlinger * and Mike Nicholls, Ecology Research Group, Department of Geographical and Life Sciences,
Canterbury Christ Church University College, Canterbury, CT1 1QU, Kent, UK. * Email: herdoe@pfaffenhofen.de
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 139 146
The White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps
of Java: natural history and conservation status,
especially on Gunung Halimun
S. van BALEN, N. J. COLLAR, D. LILEY and RUDYANTO
The White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps is a very poorly known passerine endemic to Java. A review of literature and museum
specimens reveals records from 22 more-or-less discrete lowland and hill forest patches across the island, but mainly in West Java (19
localities). In Gunung Halimun National Park (West Java) in 1994, this babbler was one of the commonest species in lowland forest
in the western parts of the area, with densities as high as 4.3 birds per hectare. It was typically encountered in small flocks, either as
part of larger mixed-species assemblages or in monospecific flocks, keeping to the middle and lower forest strata (0.5-17.5 m,
mean=4.5 m), with a mean flock size of 1 1 birds (maximum=30). Birds forage by gleaning from leaves and vigorously probing leaf-
tangles in relatively open understorey. Four vocalisations are known, of which the self-advertising trrriui is commonest. Breeding may
occur all year, possibly with a peak around May-June. In general, the species appears to be able to tolerate a certain degree of forest
disturbance, and studies at Halimun suggest that areas with small-scale disturbance and light gaps are actually preferred. Even so, it
is confined to forest on rugged terrain below 1,200 m and perhaps mainly below 1,000 m, and in only the wettest areas of Java. Forest
at these elevations is under considerable pressure, including inside Gunung Halimun National Park, and the species’s current IUCN
Red List category of Near Threatened is deemed appropriate.
INTRODUCTION
White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps is
endemic to the island of Java, Indonesia (Andrew
1992). In spite of its presence on the most populous
island in the country, in forested areas close to cities
where ornithologists and natural historians have dwelt
for many decades, and notwithstanding a fairly long
knowledge of its existence (it was described for science
in 1828), it remains exceptionally poorly known, with
not a single publication dedicated to it.
In this paper we profile the species for the first time,
pooling our knowledge from various sources: SvB
documented it during ornithological surveys of Java
(van Balen 1999) in 1980-2002, DL studied it in the
course of an expedition reviewing the status and
ecology of the birds of Gunung Halimun in 1994, and,
owing to the fact that it had previously been listed as
threatened with extinction (Collar and Andrew 1988,
Collar et al. 1994), SvB, NJC and Rudyanto accumu¬
lated and reviewed the literature, museum specimen
data and unpublished records of the species.
METHODS
Museum data and mapping
In the course of preparing an information base for
Threatened birds of Asia (BirdLife International 2001),
NJC visited as many natural history museums as
possible and compiled data from specimen labels of
taxa then considered at global risk, including White¬
breasted Babbler. The species proved to be rather
weakly represented in collections, with 65 specimens
found in only nine museums out of over 30 visited or
accessed with major international components:
RMNH (Naturalis, Leiden) 41 (including the type),
ZRCNUS (Zoological Reference Collection of the
National University of Singapore) seven, MZB
(Museum of Zoology, Bogor) six, BMNH (Natural
History Museum, Tring) four, AMNH (American
Museum of Natural History) two, ANSP (Academy of
Natural Sciences, Philadelphia) two, IRSNB (Institut
Royal des Sciences Naturelles, Brussels) one, SMF
(Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt) one and ZSM
(Zoologisches Staatsammlung, Munich) one. The
singletons in IRSNB and SMF are essentially dataless,
and were taken before 1850; but the great majority of
the remaining specimens hold useful distributional
information on their labels.
The distribution of the species was mapped (Fig. 1)
using locality data from museum specimens and infor¬
mation in the published and unpublished literature
and in the notebooks of various observers. Localities
were traced using the gazetteer in BirdLife
International (2001) or the sources cited for Indonesia
in that publication.
Java-wide observations
Ornithological fieldwork of various types was carried
out across Java by SvB in 1980-2002, during which all
records of the species were noted, and on some
occasions tape-recordings and notes on vocal and
other behaviour made. SvB also contacted two veteran
Dutch fieldworkers with experience of Java, J. H.
Becking and G. F. Mees, for their further information.
Study area in Gunung Halimun National Park
Located between Ujung Kulon and Gunung
Gede-Pangrango National Parks (Fig. 1), Gunung
Halimun forms a massif of extinct volcanoes. The
national park itself, declared in 1992, covers an eleva¬
tion range of 500-1,929 m (up to Halimun’s peak). It
holds the wettest and largest unbroken montane
rainforest on volcanic soil in all Java, with 130 km2 of
‘lowland’ forest (but forest cover only starts at
750-1,000 m) and 230 km2 of montane forest
(MacKinnon and MacKinnon 1986, Thiollay and
Meyburg 1988). The site had Priority I status for
conservation in Indonesia in MacKinnon and
MacKinnon (1986), and is considered the last remain¬
ing stronghold for the Javan gibbon Hylobates moloch
140
S. VAN BALEN et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
INDIAN OCEAN
Figure 1. Distribution of records of White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps across Java. 1. Ujung Kulon; 2. Gunung
Aseupan; 3. Cibareno; 4. Gunung Halimun; 5. Cisolok; 6. Cimaja; 7. Pelabuhan Ratu; 8. Cikiray; 9. Jampan Tengah; 10.
Gobang; 1 1. Cipetir; 12. Gunung Salak; 13. Pasir Kananga; 14. Cibening; 15. Gunung Pancar; 16. Gunung Gede-Pangrango;
17. Ciodeng; 18. Gunung Patuha; 19. Cikajang; 20. Gunung Slamet; 21. Linggoasri; 22. Lebakharjo.
and grizzled langur Presbytis comata (Kool 1992), both
of which, like several species of bird, are endemic to
West Java and have been rated among the most threat¬
ened primate species in Indonesia (Eudey 1987).
Between July and October 1994, the University of
East Anglia Halimun Expedition conducted fieldwork
on the edge of Gunung Halimun National Park in
secondary scrub, secondary forest, primary forest and
paddyfield habitats. The study site was located to the
west of the park, near the village of Ciusul, c.30 km
north of Cikotok, and in an area, locally known as
Cikuya, previously visited by the Biological Sciences
Club of Jakarta (BScC). The human population
immediately adjacent to the forest designated as the
study area numbered 1,100. The habitats surveyed lay
at 610-1,020 m.
Field methods in Gunung Halimun National
Park
Study of the White-breasted Babbler formed part of a
general avifaunal survey of the park, and the methods
employed in the fieldwork were devised for this
broader project. Thirty-four survey points were located
in forest surrounding the camp. Points were set at
intervals of 200 m along three transects, each
commencing close to the edge of the forest and extend¬
ing up to 2.5 km into the forest. Habitat and
ornithological data were collected at each point. The
following habitat variables were measured within a
circular sample area of 14 m radius: (1) percentage
cover (estimate of canopy, understorey and ground
flora); (2) mean visible distance (estimate of vegetation
density at head height); (3) presence/absence of water-
bodies, in or near the sample area; (4) leaf-litter; (5)
dead wood; (6) slope angle and aspect; (7) tree size and
density; (8) number of cut stumps; and (9) number of
dead stumps. Methods for measuring leaf-litter, dead
wood and tree size and density were as follows.
Leaf-litter. In traversing the mini-transects, leaf-
litter depth was recorded at 3 m intervals from 0 m to
27 m, giving ten measures per mini-transect and 30 in
total. Leaf-litter depth categories (measured in cm)
were 0, <4, 4-10, 11-25, 26-50 and >50. Each
category was given an index of 0-5 respectively. These
indices were then summed to give a total index of leaf-
litter abundance.
Dead wood. Traversing each mini-transect, dead
wood was recorded wherever it crossed or touched the
transect. Five size categories were used based on
diameter of the wood (in cm): <4, 4-7, 8-20, 21-50
and >50, and each category was given an index (1-5
respectively). As with the leaf-litter, indices were
summed to give a total index of dead wood abundance.
Tree size and density. Trees were grouped into size
categories based on girth (in cm) at chest height: <10,
10-24, 25-63, and >63. All trees less than 10 cm were
counted in a 2 m2 quadrat. The size and density of all
trees >10 cm girth were recorded as follows: beginning
at 30° clockwise of the path direction, and working
round the sample area in a clockwise direction, the
girth and height of all trees was recorded. This contin¬
ued until 30 trees of each category had been measured,
Forktail 21 (2005)
The White-breasted Babbler of Java: natural history and conservation status
141
or 360° of the sample area surveyed, whichever was
sooner. In the case of the former, a final bearing was
recorded, allowing the area containing 30 trees to be
calculated, and hence the density for that size category.
Each point was visited at least six times for ten
minutes, and all sightings of White-breasted Babblers
within this period were recorded. All such point counts
were conducted between 06h00 and lOhOO, and the
starting point was alternated to ensure further points
were not always visited towards the end of the time
period. Whilst walking between the points the number
of individuals seen within 3 m of the transect was
recorded. The pace was kept constant, with ten
minutes spent walking between points.
Ringing was conducted in forest and secondary
growth habitats, but not all points were netted. Nets
were placed around the points and never used in the
same place for more than two days, thus avoiding birds
familiarising themselves with net locations. For all
points the length of net and number of hours of netting
were recorded. The same nets, set at the same height,
were used at all points. All birds caught were individu¬
ally colour-marked using plastic colour rings.
Unfortunately, catch rates were too low to allow
density estimates to be calculated by mark/recapture
techniques. However, the catch rates (metres of net x
hours nets open, divided by number of individuals
trapped) give an indication of relative abundance for
understorey species. In addition the following data
were collected for all individuals trapped: wing length
(maximum chord; after Svensson 1992); weight; and
age.
RESULTS
Distribution
The species has been recorded at the following 22
localities, arranged in a west-east sequence and
charted in the same sequence on Fig. 1 (sex and age of
museum specimens are given where indicated on the
label):
(West Java) Ujung Kulon, in small flock,
Cikelapabeureum, coast west of Gunung Cikuya, July
1955 (juvenile in MZB; Hoogerwerf 1969 1971), and
south of Cijungkulon, north-east of Gunung Cikuya,
where its advertising call (see Voice) was heard several
times in forest, September 1989 (SvB); Gunung
Aseupan at Carita, 3+ birds, tape-recorded, 100 m,
September 1988 (SvB, confirming a report earlier in
the year by D. A. Holmes), several groups seen, July
1989 (Lewis et al. 1989), 4-5 birds tape-recorded, 75
m, August 1989 (SvB), 3-4 birds tape-recorded, June
1990 (SvB), June 1991 (Heath 1991), flock of six,
August 1994 (Tobias and Phelps 1994), several seen
and heard, July 1995 (SvB and J. del Hoyo), and 3-4
pairs, October 1995 (SvB); Cibareno, March and
August 1912 (o', 3? ? in RMNH); Gunung Halimun,
August 1922 (c? in MZB), at forest edge in early 1980s
(K. D. Bishop in litt. 1988), above Jajarpinang,
Cikotok, 800-1,000 m, April 1995 (SvB; tape¬
recording), July-October 1994 (DL), at Gunung
Kendeng, 1,000-1,200 m, undated (Prawiradilaga et
al. 2003) and at Gunung Bedil, 1,070 m, undated
(Prawiradilaga et al. 2003: 62, photograph); Cisolok,
late November 1911 (c? in RMNH), and Cisolok
nature reserve, July 1990, with 2-3 birds in this small
forest reserve amidst banana, ubi/ketela, etc., gardens
and secondary wilderness, along the car road, near
Karang Hawuh (J. H. Becking in litt. 2005); Cimaja,
February 1910 (juvenile in RMNH); Pelabuhan Ratu
(= Wijnkoopsbaai), October 1898-January 1899 (c? in
ANSP), May 1904 (2 dV, 2?? in RMNH), coastal
area, 30 m, March 1920 (c?, ? in AMNH; 2bV, 2? ¥ in
BMNH; 4c? eft, 2¥ ¥, 1 juvenile in ZRCNUS; Robinson
and Kloss 1924: 286), at km 4, north of Pelabuhan
Ratu, pre-1988 (in Richards and Richards 1988), at
Gunung Jayanti (north-east Pelabuhan Ratu), October
1978, 2-3 birds in heavily disturbed forest, very dry
with belukar bush (J. H. Becking in litt. 2005), and at
Table 1. Habitat variables for points where White-breasted Babblers were recorded (n=15) and those where none was recorded (n=13); no
differences were significant.
Variable Babblers recorded Babblers not recorded
142
S. van BALEN et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
Gunung Tangkuban Perahu reserve, April 1994, 4-5
birds in the 33 ha disturbed forest on the hill behind
Guha Candi bat cave near the old military airport,
100 m (J. H. Becking in litt. 2005); Cikiray, October
1910 (2cfc)"J 1?, 1 juvenile in RMNH); Jampang
Tengah, March, May and September 1903 (6oV, 1?,
1 juvenile [from September] in RMNH), at
Bojonglopang, 600 m, July 1940 (2d"cr\, 1? in MZB),
and at Lengkong, April 1994, 4-6 birds in a large
primary forest fragment in a very rugged area with
deep valleys along the road just west of Lengkong (J.
H. Becking in litt. 2005); Gobang (at Gunung
Cijengkol), 450 m, August 1948, and in forest at
source of Ciguha river, west of Cipayung and north¬
west of Gobang, 250 m, November 1948 (G. F. Mees
in litt. 2004); Cipetir, January 1897 (9 in RMNH);
Gunung Salak at Ciomas tea estate, northern slope,
800 m, July 1947 (Hoogerwerf 1948, G. F. Mees in litt.
2004); Pasir Kananga, Jampang, 420-480 m, January
1905 and July 1906 (lcf, 29 9 in RMNH; also Bartels
1906: 402); Cibening, February 1913 (a” in RMNH);
Gunung Pancar, c.600 m, 3-4 birds, December 1991
(SvB and P. Jepson); Gunung Gede-Pangrango,
November 1893 (specimen in RMNH), September
1903, November 1907 (29 9, two juveniles [latter both
November] in RMNH; also Bartels 1906: 402), at
Cimungkat, undated (Hoogerwerf 1948: 131), in the
Cibodas river valley, undated (Hoogerwerf 1949: 91),
at Tapos, 900 m, 3-4 birds, March 1993 (SvB, P.
Jepson and N. Brickie), and again 900 m, in a mixed-
species flock, November 1993 (SvB and R. Dennis),
and at Bodogol, almost certainly heard, June 1997
(SvB); Ciodeng, c.l km west of Pasirdatar, July 1923
(a” in RMNH); Gunung Patuha, foothills, Kole
Beres, common in edge along primary forest, undated
(Bartels 1931: 337); Cikajang, Banjarwangi Estate,
900 m, June 1941 (cf in MZB);
(Central Java) Gunung Slamet, southern
foothills, 750-1,500 m, December 1925 (2 specimens
in ZMA; also Voous 1948), and at Baturaden, 800 m,
June 1995 (SvB and V. Nijman); Linggoasri, Dieng
Mountains, 700-850 m, not uncommon, with four
records of 2-3+ birds, some tape-recorded, June 1995
(SvB and V. Nijman), and mist-netted during a field
study in 2001-2002 (N. Sodhi in litt. 2002);
Plate 1. White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps (year of
hatching) in the hand, Gunung Halimun National Park, 13
August 1994. Photo: D. Liley.
(East Java) Lebakharjo, Sengkaringan, 4-5 birds
with fledgling, tape-recorded October 1989' (SvB).
A single locality, ‘Gunung Andir, Cibeber’, based
on a specimen in MZB taken on 30 March 1923 by
Siebers, remains untraced.
It is worth noting that seven of these 22 traced
localities (32%) are based entirely on otherwise unpub¬
lished information from museum specimen
labels — further evidence of the extraordinary value of
museum specimens to conservation assessment (see
Collar and Rudyanto 2003).
Bare parts, biometrics and moult
The plumage of both sexes of White-breasted Babbler
was described by Sharpe (1884), and bare-part
coloration was noted by Bartels (1915-1931) from
living or freshly dead specimens. He gave the eye
colour of three male specimens as ‘beautiful dark red’
or ‘reddish-brown’, the upper mandible as black, the
lower as blue-grey (once pale, once dark) with blackish
distal half, the feet light bluish-grey, soles (on two)
yellowish, nails (pale) bluish-grey, (some) with horn-
white tips; around the eyes is an area of bare blue skin
(in two cases specifically: pale or cobalt-blue before
and above the eye, darker, more ultramarine behind
and below the eye). Some of these features can be seen
in Plates 1 and 2.
Biometric data and moult condition were noted
from 1 6 mist-netted specimens examined between 1 1
August and 23 October 1994. Of these, at least three
were certainly more than one year old (AHY = after
hatch year), and these three were all in full moult
(August); nine were certainly in their first year (HY =
hatch year), and at least six of these were noted to be
in body moult (August and October). No mensural
differences between older and younger birds were
apparent. Wing measurements were 55-60 mm
(57.1±0.41, n=15), weights 10.9-15.0 g (12. 5±0.24,
n=15) (DL). Means are given ± 1 standard error.
Density, flocking and habitat use in Gunung
Halimun National Park
On transects the White-breasted Babbler was the
commonest species recorded at Halimun. Density was
calculated by the formula: (length of transect x 6 m x
Plate 2. White-breasted Babbler Stachyris grammiceps (after
year of hatching) in the hand, Gunung Halimun National
Park, 1 1 August 1994. Photo: D. Liley.
Forktail 21 (2005)
The White-breasted Babbler of Java: natural history and conservation status
143
number of times walked) 5- (number of individuals
observed). A total length of 47.8 km of transect
resulted in 86 individuals being recorded within 3 m of
the transect, giving an estimated density of 331 .8 birds
per km2 (3.3 birds per ha). However, in the course of
219 point counts conducted within the forest, nine
flocks of White-breasted Babblers, involving a total of
67 individuals, were recorded. All sightings were within
14 m of the point, so 14 m is used as the radius by
which to calculate the area surveyed. A total of 67
individuals gives a density of 432 birds per km2 (4.3
birds per ha). During mist-netting, the species was the
second commonest (exceeded only by Little
Spiderhunter Arachnothera longirostra), with 16 birds
trapped in c. 13,000 m net-hours within the forest.
A total of 23 encounters of monospecific flocks was
made during line transects and point counts, with
mean number of birds per flock 10. 5± 1.28, range
3-30. These monospecific flocks fed in the understorey
at a mean height from the ground of 4.5± 1 .00 m, range
0.5-17.5 m. The species was virtually always present
also in large, multi-species assemblages.
There was no significant difference between the
main habitat variables measured for points where
babblers were recorded and those where they were not
(Table 1). Principal component analysis (PC A) was
used to combine the habitat variables measured to give
two variables, which together accounted for 59% of the
variation between points. The first principal compo¬
nent (PCA 1) was negatively weighted particularly by
tree height, hence points with a low PCA 1 score were
those points with a high canopy; by contrast PCA 2
was particularly negatively weighted by the percentage
cover of the understorey and mean visible distance,
hence points with a low PCA 2 score were those with a
high density of understorey, often where either
bamboo or a gap was present in the forest. By plotting
the PCA 1 and 2 scores for each point (Fig. 2), the
secondary growth/scrub points at the edge of the forest
can be clearly seen as a cluster of six points with a high
PCA 1 score. The remaining points represent a range
of forested points, with those with the higher PCA 2
scores being those with the most secondary
growth/dense understorey. It can be seen that babblers
were recorded from the range of points within the
forest.
The highest densities were recorded from those
points with scores in the mid-range of PCA 2 (Fig. 3).
Thus points with some small-scale disturbance, includ¬
ing gaps in the forest with some secondary growth,
seem to be the preferred habitat. All sightings at
Halimun were between 750 and 1,100 m, representing
the availability of suitable forest habitats and the
altitudes visited. However, fieldwork was not carried
out higher than this at Ciusul, so the species may quite
possibly be present at higher altitudes. It was not
recorded in secondary growth habitats outside of
forest.
Habitat in general
The White-breasted Babbler seems to prefer forest
with some degree of disturbance, presumably where
light-gaps in the canopy and edges allow a more luxuri¬
ant lower vegetation to flourish. Lewis et al. (1989)
reported it from highly disturbed forest, and Bartels
Table 2. Characteristics of principal components from PCA
analysis of habitat variables.
-5 0 5 10
PCA I
Figure 2. The first two principal component scores for all
points surveyed where White-breasted Babblers were present
and for points where they were not present.
Figure 3. White-breasted Babbler encounter rate per point
and PCA 2 score. The encounter rate is taken from the point
count data and is the number of individuals recorded at each
point divided by the time (in minutes) spent at each point.
(1931: 337) found it along streams in open areas.
However, it appears that such habitat must be adjacent
to and perhaps contiguous with tall, heavy forest, with
or without emergent trees. Moreover, G. F. Mees (in
litt. 2004) found it foraging at 1.5-4 m above the
ground in relatively open undergrowth of rather dark
144
S. van BALEN et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
forest, not in the dense shrubbery of more open-
canopy forest. Other records are from lightly disturbed
forest with rattan, bamboo and ginger; from the edge
of damar Agathis sp. plantation and mixed rainforest
(Gunung Slamet); inside or along the edge of the forest
in low shrubbery along trails (Linggoasri); and other
dense undergrowth (sources: all SvB).
The species has mainly, if not always, been found in
undulating to rugged areas in the wettest parts of Java,
with at least 20-40 or more rainy days during the four
driest consecutive months of the year (see van Steenis
1972: 1 1). The need for rather steep terrain may help
explain its absence from most of the northern plain of
Java, and its low densities in areas like Ujung Kulon
National Park (which has much level and little rugged
rainforest), but relatively high densities in the
rainforests of Halimun and the Dieng Mountains.
Although well to the east, Lebakharjo has tropical
rainforest, a rugged topography, and lies well within
the wettest climatic zone of van Steenis (1972).
Sody (1956) reported an altitudinal range of
600-3,000 m for the species; for the lower part of this
range he apparently did not take into account the
records at Pelabuhan Ratu (down to 30 m), whilst his
upper value is most likely based on a mistaken reading
of ‘3000 ft’ given by Bartels (1906). Also the range of
2,500-5,000 m for the species on Gunung Slamet as
reported by Voous (1948), based on two specimens
labelled thus in ZMA, is evidently the result of a
similar confusion of feet for metres, as the summit of
Slamet only reaches 3,418 m. Our data suggest an
altitudinal range for the species of 30-1,500 m, with
most records from elevations below 1,000 m.
Flocking, feeding and other behaviour in
general
White-breasted Babblers are quiet and unobtrusive,
but can be inquisitive, approaching human observers
and raising their white-streaked crown feathers whilst
inspecting them. They move in small monospecific
groups and/or in mixed-species flocks. Bartels (1931:
337) mentioned monospecific flocks of about ten
birds, but in SvB’s experience such flocks rarely, if ever,
exceed six birds: all his observations except one
involved more than one bird, and even the observation
of a singleton, in a small bird wave, may easily have
missed a second bird. Sometimes the species associates
with a single other species of babbler. SvB has more
than once seen the behaviourally very similar Grey¬
cheeked Tit Babbler Macronous flavicollis associating in
flocks with White-breasted, as well as Crescent-chested
Babbler Stachyris melanothorax and, at altitudes above
1,000 m, Chestnut-fronted Shrike Babbler Pteruthius
aenobarbus. J. H. Becking (in litt. 2005) reports other
babblers, such as Large Wren Babbler Napothera
macrodactyla, Horsfield’s Babbler Malacocincla sepiar-
ium , and possibly Temminck’s Babbler Pellorneum
pyrrogenys , as associates in mixed-species flocks.
White-breasted Babblers move rather freely in the
vegetation, certainly not skulking, typically at 3-5 m
above ground. Bartels (1915-1931) wrote of them
working their way through undergrowth and the thick
crowns of mid-storey trees. Sometimes, however, they
move into the canopy, especially on steep hills in tall
primary forest, and also, apparently, when associating
with Chestnut-fronted Shrike Babblers, which are
typical canopy-feeders (the Crescent-chested Babbler
is known to leave the undergrowth only when it joins
mixed flocks: van Balen 1987).
Foraging is typically timaliine, with much gleaning
of leaves and probing of decaying fronds and tangles.
Bartels (1915-1931) captured the birds’ behaviour
well (our translation and rendition): ‘They work very
hard, searching very carefully here and there in thorny
lianas or in fallen leaves that have gradually accumu¬
lated in small piles in plant tangles of the primary
forest, within which insects commonly hide. If they
cannot reach them from above or from the side, they
try to grip from the underside of the leaf-tangles, and
in doing so they hang upside-down like a titmouse and
then work on them skilfully.’ Food appears to consist
mainly or exclusively of insects; only grasshoppers
(Tettigoniidae) have been reported as prey items
(Becking 1989).
Voice
Bartels (1915-1931), who had an intimate knowledge
of the habits of this babbler, did not know its song, only
its call, which it did not, in his experience, give very
often. Hoogerwerf (1969-1971), another well-travelled
ornithologist on Java, was not even familiar with its
call. During surveys by SvB a number of different calls
and song types were transcribed and tape-recorded, of
which a summary follows.
Advertising call. A single, loud trilling trrriiii or
trrreeee (repeated at long, irregular intervals), increas¬
ing in volume, but at the same pitch; this call has been
heard in the months June, August, September and
October (SvB). G. F. Mees in litt. (2004) reported
similar calls' in July (a continual krrrieie...
krrrierieie. ..from birds in a small mixed-species flock)
and in August (a rather strong tschrrrrrie from a single
bird).
Begging call. A thin ti-ti-ti-ti, with first three notes
rising in pitch, appeared to be a begging call or some
call associated with courtship (birds were chasing each
other); a loud ti-ti-ti-ti , dropping in pitch, from birds in
a group including a youngster, in October, may be the
same call.
Flock contact call. A chrr chrr. . . was heard from birds
foraging high in the canopy in October. A throaty cheek
cheek from a small group with other babbler species in
March, and a flowerpecker-like soft tik heard from a
flock in September, may also be the same call.
Flight call. In flight, a chup chup was heard in June.
The (presumed) advertising call (or song) — the long
trill — bears a resemblance to that of the far more
widespread (but not on Java) Grey-throated Babbler
Stachyris nigriceps , a species which also shows some
morphological and ecological correspondence (small
size, white-streaked crown, use of submontane
habitat), and to which the White-breasted Babbler may
be most closely related. The harsh, scolding and rolling
notes so characteristic of other Stachyris babblers have
not been heard from birds on Java.
*
Breeding
No nest has been reported, and no other information
is available (Hellebrekers and Hoogerwerf 1967: 1 13).
However, the observation of advertisement calling in
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
The White-breasted Babbler of Java: natural history and conservation status
145
September and a fledgling in a flock in October (SvB),
plus museum skins of juveniles collected in February
(one), March (one), July (one), September (one),
October (one) and November (two), suggest a rather
extended and perhaps all-year breeding season, but the
retention of juvenile characters may be so protracted
that this evidence is uninterpretable. DL’s mist-netted
specimens in Halimun were in body or full moult in
August-October, suggesting that a peak in breeding
may have occurred several months earlier, around the
middle of the year (May-June).
CONSERVATION STATUS
Owing to its confinement to now highly reduced forest,
mainly in the westernmost quarter of Java, the White¬
breasted Babbler was formerly treated as a threatened
species (Collar and Andrew 1988, Collar et al. 1994),
but this evaluation was revised to ‘Near Threatened’ in
recent reviews (BirdLife International 2000, 2001),
largely as a result of evidence of abundance generated
by one of us (DL) during fieldwork in Gunung
Halimun National Park (see above). The earlier assess¬
ments were prompted by remarks such as that in
Hellebrekers and Hoogerwerf (1967: 113) that the
species was very rare. What emerges from this review is
that its rarity is perhaps more a matter of localised
distribution and unobtrusive behaviour: it must have
been this latter factor which led Vorderman (1901) to
miss it, despite his surveys of at least three localities
(Gunung Salak, Gunung Gede, Pelabuhan Ratu)
where the species is known to occur.
Even so, the conservation status of the White¬
breasted Babbler is, on the evidence assembled here,
somewhat difficult to determine. On the one hand,
(1) — the point just made — it has a range which is now
known to extend as far east as Lebakharjo in East Java,
suggesting that populations have been overlooked by
earlier explorers in certain parts of Central and
western East Java (and there are still some wholly
unexplored forests in the wettest parts of East Java);
(2) it is known to be common in at least two sites
(Gunung Halimun in West Java and Linggoasri in
Central Java), and may well prove to be so at others,
once studied more intensively; and (3) it appears to
select partly disturbed habitat, has been found in badly
degraded areas, and has survived for years in forest
fragments as small as 25 ha (Gunung Pancar) (SvB).
On the other hand, if the elevations of the species
generally only take it to 1,000 or 1,200 m (there is only
one record at 1,200 m, and only one at 1,500 m, and
the latter is fairly vague), then it must have lost, and
must be continuing in places to lose, a considerable
amount of forest habitat within its preferred range,
forcing it ever upwards towards its upper elevational
limits. Its former stronghold, the forest fragments
along Pelabuhan Ratu and adjacent to the Jampang
forests, is now more fragmented than ever, and some of
its former haunts appeared vacant in more recent
times. The species has not recently been found at
Gunung Salak and is very possibly extinct there,
perhaps because no forest now remains there below
1,200 m. Linggoasri in the Dieng Mountains is a
stronghold, but lowland and hill forest in this range is
under extreme logging pressure (SvB); indeed, in most
of East and Central Java forest has disappeared below
1,000-1,500 m. Whether it occurs further east, at
Meru Betiri, which holds rugged forest at the appropri¬
ate elevations but which is on the fringe of the wettest
zone, remains to be determined: the site has been
surveyed, but not fully. Meanwhile, as with several
other Javan endemic species — Javan Trogon
Apalharpactes reinwardti springs most immediately to
mind (see Collar and van Balen 2002) — Gunung
Halimun emerges from this review as almost certainly
the most important site of all for the species.
At Gunung Halimun the very inaccessibility of the
site has helped to maintain its forest in a relatively
undisturbed condition. Conservation takes the form of
managed production forests in a buffer zone between
the local human population and the reserve. However,
the local human population has grown, access is
improving, and anthropogenic degradation has
increased. Other threats come from logging for local
use (e.g. for fuel, and timber for housing) and for sale.
In 1994, the human population adjacent the study area
was heavily reliant on the forest, and people were
regularly encountered cutting and removing timber for
building materials and firewood. Timber for building
was squared off in situ and left for later collection,
sometimes stacked in clearings along the trails.
It seems unlikely that trade in the species is a signif¬
icant issue, but on Java, where birds are trapped for the
cage-bird trade with an intensity that is probably
unmatched anywhere else in the world (Morrison
1981, Nash 1993), it is unwise to be complacent. In
the Dieng Mountains, SvB was told that the White¬
breasted Babbler — which even had a local name,
pacetan , although this could also refer to other Stachyris
species — was occasionally caught, but the birds were
not hardy and would quickly die in cages.
Nevertheless, the species has already reached Europe,
as exemplified by a recent avicultural article (Kleefisch
and Scholtz 2001) which regrettably failed to make any
reference to the conservation status of the species.
The species is currently classified on the IUCN Red
List as Near Threatened, almost meeting criteria A2c;
A3c; Bla+b(i,ii,iii,iv,v) on the basis that its population
is declining at a rate approaching 30% in ten years, and
that it has a small, declining and severely fragmented
Extent of Occurrence (BirdLife International 2005).
On balance we believe that this classification is correct.
However, we also feel it would be wise to monitor
known and seek new populations of the White-breasted
Babbler throughout its range, in order to strengthen
the dataset on which future evaluations of its status can
be made.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Curators of museums that hold specimens of the species are thanked
for permitting access to these specimens and publication of the data
they contain: AMNH (P. R. Sweet), ANSP (D. Agro, R. S. Ridgely),
BMNH (R. P Prys-Jones), IRSNB (W. Rogermann), MZB
(Darjono, Sudaryanti), RMNH-Naturalis (R. W. R. J. Dekker, who
also granted access to the M. E. G. Bartels manuscripts), SMF (G.
Mayr), ZRCNUS (Mrs Yang Chang Man) and ZSM (J. Reichholf).
Thanks also go especially to J. H. Becking and G. F. Mees for gener¬
ously sharing their field notes, and to all observers mentioned in the
146
S. van BALEN et al.
Forktail 21 (2005)
paper for their individual records. The 1994 UEA Halimun
Expedition has many thanks to offer. A number of people kindly
helped with the fieldwork, especially T. Holzer and R. Nightingale. In
Indonesia thanks go especially to LIPI (Bogor) for sponsoring the
research, to all at the Biological Sciences Club of Jakarta for their
hospitality and support, and to the following: Dr D. Darnaedi (LIPI
Bogor), A. Gunawan (BScC), I. Hartadi (WF Indonesia), Y. Istiyai
(BScC), I. Jackson, E. Kasim (Perhutani Cikotok), U. Makandolu,
C. Nahot, R. Nixon (Biological Sciences Club of Jakarta), D.
Purwanto (BScC), Pak Wahyudi (PHPA Cibodas), U. Wijanarko, and
all the villagers of Ciusul, Ciomas, and Jajarpinang. The BP
Conservation Expedition Awards, British Ecological Society,
Institute of Biology, Phillip Reckett Memorial Trust, and Royal
Geographical Society kindly provided financial support.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P. (1992) The birds of Indonesia: a checklist (Peters’ sequence) .
Jakarta: Indonesian Ornithological Society.
van Balen, S. (1987) Comparison of bird counts and bird observa¬
tions in the neighbourhood of Bogor (Indonesia). MSc thesis.
State University of Utrecht, Netherlands.
van Balen, S. (1999) Differential extinction patterns in Javan forest
birds. Tropical Resource Management Papers 30: 39-57.
Bartels, E. (1931) Vogels van Kole Beres. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift
voor Nederlandsch-Indie 9 1 : 308-348.
Bartels, M. (1906) Systematische Ubersicht meiner Java-Vogel. J.
Orn. 54: 383-407, 497-519.
Bartels, M. E. G. (1915-1931) Diaries and notebooks on Javan
birds. Unpublished typescripts and manuscripts held at RMNH.
Becking, J. H. (1989) Henri Jacob Victor Sody (1 892-1 859) : his life and
work. Leiden: Brill.
BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2005) Species factsheet: Stachyris grammi-
ceps. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 6/16/2005
Collar, N. J. and Andrew, P ( 1 988) Birds to watch: the ICBP world list
of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for
Bird Preservation (Techn. Publ. 8).
Collar, N. J. and van Balen, S. (2002) The Blue-tailed Trogon
Harpactes ( Apalharpactes ) reinwardtii : species limits and conser¬
vation status. Forktail 18: 121-125.
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to
watch 2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.:
BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series 4).
Collar, N. J. and Rudyanto (2003) The archive and the ark: bird
specimen data in conservation status assessment. Bull. Brit. Orn.
Club 123A: 95-113.
Eudey, A. A., compiler (1987) Action plan for Asian primate conserva¬
tion: 1987-1991. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN-The World
Conservation Union.
Heath, P. (1991) Greater Sundas 1991 (Sumatra, Java and Bali).
Unpublished report.
Hellebrekers, W. P. J. and Hoogerwerf, A. (1967) A further contribu¬
tion to our oological knowledge of the island of Java (Indonesia).
Zool.Verhandel. 88.
Hoogerwerf, A. (1948) Contribution to the knowledge of the distri¬
bution of birds on the island of Java. Treubia 19: 83-137.
Hoogerwerf, A. (1949) De avifauna van Tjibodas en omgeving (Java).
Buitenzorg: Kon. Plantentuin van Indonesia.
Hoogerwerf, A. (1969-1971) On the ornithology of the Rhino
Sanctuary Udjung Kulon in West Java (Indonesia). Nat. Hist.
Bull. Siam Soc. 23: 9-65, 447-500; 24: 79-135.
Kleefisch, T. and Scholtz, C. (2001) Neue Timalien auf dem
Vogelmarkt. Gefied.Welt 125: 366-369.
Kool, K. M. (1992) The status of endangered primates in Gunung
Halimun reserve, Indonesia. Oryx 26: 29-33.
Lewis, A., Morris, P. and Higgins, N. (1989) West Indonesia 1989.
Sumatra, Java and Bali. Unpublished report.
MacKinnon, J. and MacKinnon, K. (1986) Review of the protected
area system in the Indo-Malayan Realm. Gland, Switzerland:
IUCN.
Morrison, A. (1981) A note on Javanese aviculture. Avicult. Mag. 86:
108-110.
Nash, S. V. (1993) Sold for a song. The trade in Southeast Asian Non-
CITES birds. Cambridge, U. Is..: Traffic.
Prawiradilaga, D. M., Marakarmah, A. and Wijamukti, S. (2003) A
photographic guide to the birds of Javan montane forest: Gunung
Halimun National Park. Jakarta: LIPI, JICA and PHKA
Richards, G. and Richards, L. (1988) Java and Bali. Unpublished
report.
Robinson, H. C. and Kloss, C. B. (1924) A nominal list of the birds
collected in Java. Treubia 5: 267-298.
Sharpe, R. B. (1884) Notes onTimeliidae [szc]. Notes Leyden Mus. 6:
167-178.
Sody, H. J. V. (1956) De Javaanse bosvogels (Javanese forest birds).
Majalah Ilmu Alam Indonesia 112: 153-170.
van Steenis, C. G. G. J. (1972) The mountain flora of Java. Leiden: E.
J. Brill.
Svensson, L. (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. Fourth
edition. Stockholm: published by the author.
Thiollay, J.-M. and Meyburg, B.-U. (1988) Forest fragmentation and
the conservation of raptors: survey on the island of Java. Biol.
Conserv. 44: 229-250.
Tobias, J. and Phelps, L. (1994) Sumatra, Java and Bali 1994. A
report of birds and mammals recorded in the Greater Sundas.
Unpublished report.
Voous, K. H. (1948) Notes on a collection of Javanese birds. Limosa
21: 85-100.
Vorderman, A. G. (1901) Systematisch overzicht van vogels welke op
Java inheemsch zijn. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-
Indie 60: 1-120.
S. van Balen, Roompotstraat 44, 6826 Arnhem, Netherlands. Email: bvanbalen001@hotmail.com
N. J. Collar, Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge
CB2 3EJ, and BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U.K. Email:
nigel.collar@birdlife.org
D. Liley, Court House, Binnegar Lane, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 6AJ, U.K. Email: durwyn.liley@footprint-
ecology.co.uk
Rudyanto, BirdLife Asia Division, c/o BirdLife Indonesia, PO Box 310/Boo, Bogor 16003, Indonesia. Email:
rudyanto@birdlife-asia.org
FORKTAIL 21 (2005): 147 160
A review of historic and recent bird records
from Lombok, Indonesia
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
The birds of Lombok, in the Lesser Sunda islands of Indonesia, are relatively poorly known owing to few observers having visited the
island, both in recent years and in the past. The limited number of available historical records are summarised here and compared
with all available modern day records. A total of 180 species have been recorded on the island, including 13 threatened, Near
Threatened or restricted-range species. Thirty-six species have not been recorded since 1930, including the globally threatened Flores
Green Pigeon Treron floris and the Near Threatened Cinnamon-collared Kingfisher Todiramphus australasia. The Critically Endangered
Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacarua sulphured has only been reported on two occasions since 1973. The present status on Lombok of
many of these species is unclear, and more survey effort is required, especially within the important Gunung Rinjani National Park.
INTRODUCTION
Lombok (4,619 km2) is the westernmost island of the
Northern Nusa Tenggara Endemic Bird Area, which
also includes the islands of Sumbawa, Komodo, Flores
and Alor (Stattersfield et al. 1998). Lombok lies
c.35 1cm east of Bali, from which it is separated by the
Lombok Straits. It is roughly circular in shape, with
Gunung Rinjani (3,726 m), the third highest peak in
Indonesia, located approximately in the central north.
It is a very large and active volcano, and the source of
all the rivers on Lombok (Monk et al. 1997). Dry
deciduous monsoon forest is found in the lowlands,
giving way to moist deciduous forest in the foothills,
semi-evergreen rainforest on the slopes, and evergreen
montane forest on the upper reaches of the mountain.
Above 2,100 m the vegetation is dominated by
Casuarina sp. At c.2,500 m the forest becomes more
open, with a unique type of Rhododendron sp. forest at
2,600-2,900 m grading into low montane scrub
(Coates and Bishop 1997, Monk et al. 1997, SDM
personal observations). Gunung Rinjani National
Park, which was established by the Dutch prior to
Indonesia’s independence (FAO/UNDP 1982), covers
1,590 km’ (Morrison 2001), representing c.29% of the
island’s area. It is the only national park on Lombok,
and protects much of the remaining evergreen hill and
montane forest.
Apart from a significant tract of forest on the south¬
west peninsula at Batu Gendang, forest elsewhere has
been cleared for logging and agriculture, especially rice
fields (Monk et al. 1997). Human pressures on
Lombok are severe. Since the mid-nineteenth century
the population of Nusa Tenggara (Lesser Sundas) has
increased exponentially (Monk et al. 1997), from less
than one million in 1840, to eight million in the 1990s.
The present population of Lombok is approximately
4.3 million: an increase of c.500% since the mid-
Figure 1 . Map of Lombok, Indonesia, with localities mentioned in the text
148
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
1800s. The rural population density of the island is one
of the highest in the region, at 101-250 people per km3
(Monk et al. 1997).
The UNDP/FAO National Conservation Plan for
Indonesia identified five areas of conservation potential
on Lombok, including Gunung Rinjani National Park
(UNDP/FAO 1982). The plan also proposed a
150 km3 wildlife sanctuary covering Batu Gendang on
the south-west peninsula of Lombok to protect exten¬
sive lowland forest and cliffs where seabirds breed.
Monk et al. (1997) noted that this was one of the few
remaining areas of primary lowland forest in Nusa
Tenggara Barat, and RePPProt (1989) identified it as a
priority conservation area. Very little information is
available for the area, and it would appear that no
ornithologists have visited it in recent times.
Avifauna
Alfred Russel Wallace was the first to note the differing
nature of the Lombok avifauna in comparison to that
of Bali to the west and Sumbawa and Flores to the
east. Wallace noted ‘the great contrast between the two
divisions of the archipelago is nowhere so abruptly
exhibited as on passing from the island of Bali to that
of Lombock [w] , where the two regions are in closest
proximity.’ He found barbets, bulbuls and woodpeck¬
ers to be absent on Lombok despite occurring on Bali,
and noted the appearance of cockatoos, honeyeaters
and scrubfowls. He noted ‘while there is a great
preponderance of the forms of the Australian region in
T imor, they decrease going westward, till in Lombock
[sic] they are equalled by the Indian forms’. Mayr
(1944) subsequently found that the percentage of birds
of Asian origin was 73% on Lombok compared to 63%
in Flores and 87% in Bali. Wallace marked the straits
between Bali and Lombok (and between Borneo and
Sulawesi) as the geographic boundary between the
Oriental and the Australian biogeographic zones, and
this boundary has been subsequently referred to as
‘Wallace’s Line’.
At least five species occur in Wallacea only on
Lombok: Wedge-tailed Green Pigeon Treron sphenura,
Mangrove Whistler Pachycephala grisola. Scarlet
Minivet Pericrocotus flammeus , Ashy Drongo Dicrurus
leucophaeus and Olive -backed Tailorbird Orthotomus
sepium. However, Lombok is also notable for those
species which appear to be absent from the island,
including several species that occur on Bali to the west
and Sumbawa to east, e.g. Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus
sinensis , Javan Plover Charadrius javanicus, Common
Kingfisher Alcedo atthis, Short-tailed Starling Aplonis
minor , Hill Myna Gracula religiosa and Oriental White-
eye Zosterops palpebrosus.
According to Stattersfield et al. (1998), seven
restricted-range birds occur on Lombok, but none is
endemic to the island, compared to 23 restricted-range
species and four single-island endemics on Flores and
28 and ten respectively on Timor (Monk et al. 1997).
The paucity of endemics on Lombok is partly a
function of its proximity to Bali, comparatively small
size and relatively recent connection to Sumbawa.
In general, Lombok has been infrequently visited by
ornithologists, and consequently its avifauna is rather
poorly known. Appendix 1 provides details of all
known ornithological visits, where available. Most
recent observers have spent only brief periods of time
on the island and have concentrated their efforts on the
evergreen rainforests on the slopes of Gunung Rinjani.
The paucity of recent visits can be explained by fact
that the island holds no single-island endemics and
only a small sample of the endemic and near-endemic
birds of northern Nusa Tenggara.
METHODS
SDM visited Lombok during 25-29 September 1995
and conducted a brief survey of Gunung Rinjani
National Park, in addition to visiting a number of
locations along the west coast and in the central
district. These records were collated together with
historical and recently published data and unpublished
information from several birders who have visited the
island in recent times. As no records could be traced
between Kuroda’s visit in 1929 and Lincoln’s in 1973
(apart from three species recorded by Horst [1935]),
we used 1930 as a cut-off date to define species that
have not been recorded in recent times. Taxonomy
follows Inskipp et al. (1996) except where we note
historical names/synonyms. Global conservation status
follows BirdLife International (2004, 2005).
Restricted-range status follows Stattersfield et al.
(1998).
RESULTS
A total of 180 species have been recorded on Lombok
(Appendix 2), plus five species which require further
confirmation (Common Kingfisher, White-throated
Needletail Hirundapus caudacutus, Nicobar Pigeon
Caloenas nicobarica, Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
and Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylo-
nensis ) and Java Sparrow Lonchura oryzivora which is
almost certainly introduced. Thirty-six species have
not been recorded since 1930, and 42 species have
been added in recent years. The total includes seven
restricted-range species: Flores Green Pigeon Treron
floris, Dark-backed Imperial Pigeon Ducula lacernulata ,
Cinnamon-collared Kingfisher Todiramphus australasia,
White-rumped Kingfisher Caridonax fulgidus,
Chestnut-backed Thrush Zoothera dohertyi, Scaly-
crowned Honeyeater Lichmera lombokia and
Red-chested Flowerpecker Dicauem maugei. Flores
Hawk Eagle Spizaetus floris was given specific status by
Gjershaug et al. (2004) subsequent to the classification
of restricted-range species by Stattersfield et al (1998),
and will no doubt also qualify as a restricted-range
species. Five species are categorised as globally threat¬
ened: Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea
(Critically Endangered), Flores Green Pigeon
(Vulnerable), Flores Hawk Eagle (Endangered),
Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi
(Critically Endangered) and Black-winged Starling
Sturnus melanopterus (Endangered). A further three
species are classified as Near Threatened: Malaysian
Plover Charadrius peronii, Cinnamon-collared
Kingfisher and Chestnut-backed Thrush. Thus a total
of 12 species are threatened, Near Threatened or
restricted-range.
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
149
Here we discuss these species, plus those that have
not been recorded recently (identified as ‘Pre-1930’),
and others of particular interest. Unconfirmed and
introduced species are listed in square brackets.
Orange-footed Scrubfowl Megapodius reinwardt
Pre-1930. Collected by Wallace (1863); Everett
collected a specimen at 900 m but found no nest
mounds (Hartert 1896b). There appear to be no
further records of this species on Lombok. Although it
is a mobile species that may never have been resident,
it seems very unlikely that such a large and relatively
vocal species could be overlooked. A survey of lowland
sites is required to confirm its status.
Green Junglefowl Gallus varius
Most observers prior to 1930 recorded this species, but
it has only been reported once since then, at c.600 m
on Gunung Rinjani (Myers 1995). Historical records
document the species from 400-1,515 m. In 1896,
Everett reported that it was ‘not infrequently’ brought
into Ampenan for sale by local people (Hartert 1 896b) .
During 1995, SDM observed a pair in a cage at a
house in Mataram. This species has a large range from
Java through to Sumba and Alor, and although
described as common, it is thought to be declining in
many areas (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Pacific Black Duck Anas super ciliosa
Pre-1930. A single male was collected in breeding
condition during April 1896 by Everett (Hartert
1896b). Surprisingly, there appear to be no subsequent
records. The species is widespread and locally common
elsewhere in the Lesser Sundas (Coates and Bishop
1997) and Bali (KDB personal observations,
MacKinnon and Phillipps 1993).
Barred Buttonquail Turnix suscitator
Pre-1930. Two females and a male were collected by
Everett in the lowlands near Ampenan (Hartert
1896b). Rensch (1931) collected a number of speci¬
mens from Swela and Ekas and observed the species
up to 400 m, suggesting that the species was quite
common. That it has not been recorded since then
implies that the species has either declined dramati¬
cally, or more likely has been overlooked by recent
observers.
Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting
Pre-1930. This species is known from Lombok only
from a single specimen collected by Wallace (1863).
Elsewhere in the region this species is found in high-
quality riparian habitat, including mangrove forests
(personal observations).
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
Pre-1930. Specimens were collected by Wallace
(1863), Everett (a male and two females: Hartert
1896b) and Rensch (1931; one at Narmada). There
appear to be no subsequent records.
Stork-billed Kingfisher Halcyon capensis
Pre-1930. This species is known on Lombok from a
single specimen collected by Wallace (1863). Although
it is a large and conspicuous species, it is possible that
it has been overlooked by recent observers, who do not
appear to have visited areas with suitable habitat.
Cinnamon-collared Kingfisher Todiramphus
australasia
Near Threatened; restricted-range; pre-1930. Doherty
found this attractive endemic up to 610 m (Hartert
1896a), and Rensch (1931) recorded it at Swela.
Although there are no subsequent records, it is incon¬
spicuous and easily overlooked (Coates and Bishop
1997). It occurs on Lombok, Sumba, Timor and the
Banda Islands where it is found up to 700 m in lowland
monsoon forest (BirdLife International 2001). This
distribution is notable in that Lombok is the only
known locality in the northern Lesser Sundas. On
Lombok, forest clearance and the practice of setting
fires in the dry season are serious threats to this
species. Further surveys may reveal the continuing
presence of this species on Lombok.
White-rumped Kingfisher Caridonax fulgidus
Restricted-range. This species was recorded by four
collectors prior to 1930 and by three observers subse¬
quently (see Appendix 2). It is restricted to Lombok,
Sumbawa, Flores (Coates and Bishop 1997) and
Adonara (Trainor 2002b). It is apparently common on
Flores and Sumbawa (Verhoeye and Holmes 1999),
utilising a variety of habitats including village scrub
with tall trees and lightly wooded cultivation (Coates
and Bishop 1997). It is classified as Least Concern, but
its biology and status are poorly known (del Hoyo et al.
2001). Further surveys for this species are needed on
Lombok.
Rusty-breasted Cuckoo Cacomantis sepulcralis
Pre-1930. Specimens were collected by Doherty at 300
m (Hartert 1896a), Everett at 455-600 m (Hartert
1896b), and Rensch (1931; a female at Sembalun). In
1988, it was recorded fromTetebatu (Andrews 1989).
Shining Bronze Cuckoo Chrysococcyx lucidus
Pre-1930. This species was collected only by Wallace
(1863).
Horsfield’s Bronze Cuckoo Chrysococcyx basalts
This species was first recorded for Lombok in May
1990 when van Balen (in Johnstone et al. 1993)
observed two birds at Bayan, near Batu Koq. This
Austral migrant is generally uncommon throughout
Wallacea (Coates and Bishop 1997). However, obser¬
vations by a resident observer on Flores found it
common during April-May and less common during
June-August (Verhoeye and Holmes 1999), suggesting
that the species may be overlooked elsewhere in the
Lesser Sundas.
Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopacea
Pre-1930. The only record for Lombok is of a
specimen collected by Wallace (1863). This species is
locally moderately common on Flores (Verhoeye and
Holmes 1999) but otherwise uncommon, rare or
overlooked in Wallacea (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Although it gives loud vocalisations at certain times of
the year, it is otherwise very inconspicuous and thus
easily overlooked.
150
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
Yellow- crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea
Critically Endangered. In 1856, Wallace (1863) found
this species to be abundant and ‘their loud screams,
conspicuous white colour and pretty yellow crests
rendered them a very important feature in the
landscape’. He collected a specimen from Labuan
Tring, south of Ampanan during June/July. Vorderman
(1895) collected this species in October 1894 at
Pringgabaya, Kalijaga and between Pancor and
Tandjong (Tanjung) and noted that the species was
found in flocks of 8-10 individuals in the interior.
Doherty (Hartert 1896a) obtained two female and
three male specimens from 300-1,500 m. Everett
collected a pair at an unknown locality during June
1896 (Hartert 1896b). Rensch (1931) collected speci¬
mens near Narmada (200 m), Swela (400-700 m) and
Sembalun (1,200 m) during March 1927, and
regarded this species as ‘not rare’. Judging from these
records, the species was common or even abundant as
recently as the late 1920s. Lincoln (1975) reported
that ‘cockatoos were relatively scarce on the islands’. C.
R. Trainor (in BirdLife International 2001) reported
one bird at an unstated location during 2000, and V.
Nijman {in litt. 2004) reported a provisional sight
record of a single bird in forest on the northern slopes
of Gunung Rinjani in August 2001. The species has
suffered a catastrophic population decline throughout
its range since the 1970s, largely as a result of trapping
for the pet trade, exacerbated by ongoing habitat
destruction (BirdLife International 2001).
[Eclectus Parrot Eclectus roratus
Everett stated that Eclectus sp. incert. was ‘sometimes
brought into the town of Ampenan by the hill natives,
who declare it is not uncommon in places, and that it
flies wild in the jungle’ but he saw only one bird
brought in by the local people and considered ‘whether
this parrot is one of the more eastern species which has
escaped from captivity or is an endemic species’. Given
that the species is now known to occur no further west
than Sumba, it is clear that these were birds traded
from further east.]
Edible-nest Swiftlet Collocalia fuciphaga
White and Bruce (1986) pointed out that the nests and
two juveniles reported by Rensch (1931) are ‘clearly
not of this species and its presence there is not clear’.
The first unambiguous record of this species on
Lombok would appear to be by Thomas (1994), who
found it to be common between Pos II and Batu Koq
on the slopes of Gunung Rinjani. Myers (1995) saw it
on all dates in a variety of habitats. Garcia (1997)
recorded small flocks over forest on the north-west
foothills of Gunung Rinjani. This species occurs
throughout the Lesser Sundas (Coates and Bishop
1997), it is common on neighbouring Sumbawa
(Butchart et al. 1996) and very common on Flores
(Verhoeye and Holmes 1999).
[White-throated Needletail. Hirundapus
caudacutus
Rensch (1931) observed some large ‘hirundids’ on the
outer northern slopes of Gunung Rinjani. He noted
that they showed a bright throat and brown under¬
parts but he was unable to collect specimens. The
record is unconfirmed, but included here to alert
other observers to the possibility of this species’s
presence.]
Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis
SDM recorded this species on 25 September 1995 in a
coconut palm plantation in the Mataram area.
Subsequently, Garcia (1997) saw two individuals over
a coconut palm grove south of Pemenang during 1997.
Grey-rumped Treeswift Hemiprocne longipennis
This species was first recorded in 1990 by Johnstone et
al. (1993). Subsequently, it has been recorded by many
observers. Given the conspicuous behaviour of this
species, it is unlikely that earlier ornithologists
overlooked it. It may be a recent colonist, possibly
following the clearance of lowland forest resulting in
more suitable lightly wooded farmland. Lombok is
currently the only island within the Lesser Sundas on
which this species has been recorded (Coates and
Bishop 1997). Grey-rumped Treeswift is moderately
common and widespread on nearby Bali (MacKinnon
and Phillipps 1993), the presumed source of the
Lombok birds if they have recently colonised.
Barn Owl Tyto alba
Pre- 1930. The only record from Lombok appears to be
that of Rensch (1931) who collected a male and a
female near Swela (400 m) in 1927. This species is
rather poorly known throughout Wallacea and appears
to very local and uncommon, but possibly overlooked
(Coates and Bishop 1997, Verhoeye and Holmes
1999).
Savanna Nightjar Caprimulgus afjinis
Pre- 1930. Everett collected a ‘fine series’ of this species
(Hartert 1896b). He found it to be common at
Ampenan, but did not hear it at any of the ‘inland
stations’. This species is generally very tolerant of
human disturbance (personal observations) but there
has been a lack of survey effort on Lombok at
dusk/night in particular.
Rock Pigeon Columba livia
Lansley (1986) observed a flock of ten or more at
Ampenan in December 1986. SDM subsequently saw
this species in small numbers flying over cultivated
areas on the west coast in 1995. It is present in most
towns in Wallacea, but curiously there are no other
records for Lombok.
Metallic Pigeon Columba vitiensis
This inconspicuous species was reported on five
occasions on Lombok prior to 1930, but only twice
since then: by Gibbs (1990) and Garcia (1997). All
records appear to be from 455-1,220 m on the slopes
of Gunung Rinjani. The distinctive metallica race of this
species is restricted to the Lesser Sundas, where it is
described as generally uncommon.
Island Collared Dove Streptopelia bitorquata
Pre-1930. One female specimen -was collected by
Rensch at Ekas (1931). The species was also collected
by Everett (Hartert 1896b) and Wallace (1863), but no
details were given. In addition to being affected by
Forktail 21 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
151
habitat loss, this species may have suffered as a result
of hunting.
Little Cuckoo Dove Macropygia ruficeps
Pre-1930. Everett collected one male at 760 m
(Hartert 1896b). A shy and retiring species that is
infrequently seen (Coates and Bishop 1997), it may
have been overlooked in recent years.
Peaceful Dove Geopelia striata
Pre-1930. Two females were collected by Everett
(Hartert 1896b), and Wallace (1863) also collected the
species. The lack of recent records is curious, as this is
a conspicuous species that is tolerant of disturbed
habitats (personal observations).
[Nicobar Pigeon Caloenas nicobarica
Near Threatened. This species has been claimed only
once on Lombok, by Horst (1935), who found one
along with Black-naped Fruit-Dove Ptilinopus
melanospila and several other unidentified species in
the collection of a bird hunter at Sembalun, on the
slopes of Gunung Rinjani. Given the anecdotal nature
of Horst’s article, and the fact that he was unable to
identify other species in the hunter’s possession, this
record should be treated as unconfirmed.]
Flores Green Pigeon Treron floris
Vulnerable; restricted-range; pre-1930. This species
was collected by Doherty at 610 m (Hartert 1896a)
but, notably, not by Everett (see Hartert 1896b). There
is a specimen of a female in the Natural History
Museum, Tring, U.K., that is labelled by Hartert as
griseicauda (Rensch 1931) and this would appear to be
the specimen collected by Doherty. This specimen
appears to have been overlooked by Birdlife
International (2001) presumably because it was
labelled as griseicauda. T. floris has previously been
treated by some authorities as conspecific with grise¬
icauda and pompadora (Inskipp et al. 1996). Birdlife
International (2001) cites Rensch (1931) as
documenting a specimen collected from Bayan
(‘Batjan’), at 200 m, during April 1909. The specimen
appears to have been collected by J. Elbert in 1909
(Rensch 1931, Elbert 1911) and is currently housed in
the Seckenburger Museum, Frankfurt, Germany.
Flores Green Pigeon thus appears to be known from
Lombok on the basis of just two specimens and has not
been recorded by any recent observers. It is possible
that this species was never common on Lombok
(Coates and Bishop 1997, Birdlife International 2001)
although a recent summary of what is known about
this species elsewhere suggests it is often overlooked
because of its seasonal movements in response to the
presence or absence of fruiting fig trees (see Birdlife
International 2001). It inhabits lowland moist decidu¬
ous monsoon forest from Lombok to Alor (Coates and
Bishop 1997). This habitat is highly threatened on
Lombok. It has been recorded infrequently on Flores
in recent years, where it is described as uncommon and
patchily distributed (Verhoeye and Holmes 1999,
Trainor and Lesmana 2000, BirdLife International
2001). On Sumbawa there are only two recent records
(Butchart et al. 1996, Trainor 2002a). On Lomblen, the
species is still common where suitable habitat remains
Trainor (2003).
Wedge-tailed Green Pigeon Treron sphenura
Pre-1930. Everett collected an adult male of ‘this rare
pigeon’ from Bendera on Gunung Rinjam at 1,220 m
(Hartert 1896b). The only other record appears to be
a male collected by Rensch (1931) at Pelawangan, also
on Gunung Rinjani, at 2,500-2,900 m in rhododen¬
dron forest. Lombok is the only island in Wallacea on
which this species has been recorded (Coates and
Bishop 1997). The distinctive subspecies korthalsi, to
which the Lombok population belongs, also occurs on
neighbouring Java, where it is common in mountains
(MacKinnon and Phillipps 1993). The lack of recent
records is difficult to explain; more rigorous surveys at
high elevations will presumably find the species, as
suitable habitat remains.
Black-naped Fruit Dove Ptilinopus melanospila
This species is described as common in Wallacea
(Coates and Bishop 1997), but while there are many
records on Lombok prior to 1930, it has only been
reported once in recent times, by Lansley (1986) from
forest north of Mataram.
Dark-backed Imperial Pigeon Ducula lacernulata
Restricted-range. This species has been observed on
Lombok by at least three recent observers (see
Appendix 2), mostly at higher altitudes. It is found
from West Java east to Flores. Interestingly, it is the
only restricted-range species from the Lesser Sundas
that also occurs to the west ofWallace’s Line. Although
it is clearly still quite common, it is sensitive to human
disturbance and hunting (del Hoyo 1997, Trainor
2002b). The distinctive endemic sasakensis subspecies
from Lombok, Sumbawa and Flores may prove to be a
distinct species (Butchart et al. 1996), and a review of
its status is required.
Pied Imperial Pigeon Ducula bicolor
Two birds were observed on Gili Air, off the north-west
coast of Lombok in 1985 (Nash and Nash 1986). This
was until recently the only record of this species
anywhere in the Lesser Sundas, but it has now also
been recorded on Komodo and Flores (Coates and
Bishop 1997, Bishop in prep.). It is generally a highly
mobile small-island species and requires coastal forests
with fruiting trees (Wells 1999).
Red-legged Crake Rallina fasciata
Pre-1930. The only record from Lombok appears to be
that of a female collected by Everett at 460 m (Hartert
1896b). The status of this secretive species in Wallacea
is unclear, although it has been reported breeding on
Flores, where it is apparently common (Schmutz
1977). Birds from Flores may disperse widely (Coates
and Bishop 1997), and it is possible that migrants from
southern Asia also occur (see Wells 1999, Marchant
and Higgins 1993).
Slaty-breasted Rail Gallirallus striatus
One was recorded foraging in mangroves in Lembar
harbour in October 1991 by Johnstone et al. (1993).
The species may be only a vagrant to the Lesser
152
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
Sundas, with just one other record: from Sawu, east of
Sumba, in August/September 1896 (Coates and
Bishop 1997). Large numbers have been observed
during August in degraded mangroves on the south
coast of neighbouring Bali (KDB personal observa¬
tions), suggesting that the species may in fact be a
regular migrant as far as Wallace’s Line, at least.
White-browed Crake Porzana cinerea
Pre- 1930. This species is known on Lombok only from
an adult male and a juvenile male collected by Rensch
(1931) from Labuhan Haji.
Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus
Pre- 1930. This species is known on Lombok only from
a specimen, apparently belonging to the race orientalis,
collected by Wallace (1863).
Pin-tailed Snipe Gallinago stenura
Pre- 1930. Rensch (1931) collected a male at Narmada
(undated) and stated that the species was previously
known as a winter visitor only as far as Bali.
Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii
Near Threatened; pre- 1930. One was collected by
Everett (Hartert 1896b) but no details are given. This
is a scarce species throughout the region, which is
found on undisturbed sandy beaches (Hayman et al.
1986), a habitat that, on Lombok, has suffered recently
owing to increasing human pressures.
Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis
Pre- 1930. Van Bemmel (1940) ( contra White and
Bruce 1986) listed a specimen collected on 18
December 1939 near Mataram by ‘E. G. A. Lapre?’.
Until recently, there were very few records of this
species in the Lesser Sundas with the only other
definite records being from Sumbawa and Flores
(Coates and Bishop 1997, Verhoeye and Elolmes
1999). However, it has now been reported as locally
abundant on Timor (C. R. Trainor in litt. 2005).
Recently it has been proposed that the Australian
taxon is sufficiently distinct to be elevated to specific
status: Australian Painted-snipe R. australis (Lane and
Rogers 2000). If this is valid, the Lesser Sundas would
represent the eastern limit of the distribution of R.
benghalensis sensu stricto, possibly accounting for its
scarcity in the region, something that seems to have
puzzled White and Bruce (1986), despite the species
being easy to overlook.
Osprey Pandion haliaetus
Pre- 1930. Rensch (1931) collected a male at Ekas and
found this species breeding on Lombok during April.
Common in the Sulawesi and Maluku regions of
Wallacea but less so in the Lesser Sundas (Coates and
Bishop 1997).
Pacific Baza Aviceda subcristata
Pre-1930.The only record for Lombok appears to be a
male collected at 460 m by Everett (Hartert 1896b).
Lombok represents the western limit of its range; it is
uncommon on neighbouring Flores (Verhoeye and
Holmes 1999), while the present status on Sumbawa is
uncertain.
Oriental Honey-buzzard Pernis ptilorhync,us
This species was first recorded on Lombok on 20
August 1997 when one flew in from the Lombok Strait
over Sengiggi on the west coast (Garcia 1997). Two
birds were recorded near Bangko Bangko on 30
December 2004 (C. R. Trainor in litt. 2005). The
relatively large number of recent records from the
Lesser Sundas, especially during October-April
(Coates and Bishop 1997), suggests that this region is
an important non-breeding area for the migrant race
orientalis. The species is an abundant migrant through
Bali during October and early May (Ash 1984, 1993),
and was therefore to be expected on Lombok.
Black Kite Milvus migrans
Pre- 1930. Everett collected a specimen, but no other
details are given (Hartert 1896b). Although it is locally
common on Sulawesi and Timor, this species in
considered to be generally uncommon in Wallacea
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Brown Goshawk Accipiter fasciatus
Pre-1930. One bird was collected by Wallace (1863).
Rensch (1931) gave Lombok as part of the species’s
distribution, although he did not collect a specimen
himself. The species is sparsely distributed in Wallacea,
although locally common on Sumba and Flores
(Coates and Bishop 1997); Lombok represents the
westernmost part of its range.
[Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
Myers (1995) had an unconfirmed record at Senaru.
Given its distribution throughout South-East Asia,
Sulawesi and the Moluccas (White and Bruce 1986),
the species’s ' presence on Lombok would not be
unexpected.]
Flores Hawk Eagle Spizaetus floris
Endangered. Gjershaug et al. (2004) recently proposed
specific status for this taxon; it was previously treated
as a subspecies of Changeable Hawk Eagle 5. cirrhatus,
and BirdLife International now treat it as Endangered
(BirdLife International 2005). It was previously known
from Lombok only by one unconfirmed sight record
(Kuroda 1930). V. Nijman (in litt. 2004) reported a
displaying pair from the northern slopes of Gunung
Rinjani during August-September 2001. In September
2002, Gjershaug et al. (2004) recorded this species at
four sites on the border of Gunung Rinjani National
Park. The species is otherwise found on Sumbawa
(where there are very few records) and Flores (where it
appears to be uncommon), plus the satellite islands of
Satonda and Rinca (Gjershaug et al. 2004). Using an
estimate of territory size and the area of remaining
forest, Prawiradilaga et al. (in prep., cited in BirdLife
International 2005) have estimated that the breeding
population consists of fewer than 100 pairs. The
species is threatened by habitat loss and human perse¬
cution, processes which are of particular concern on
the heavily populated island of Lombok. Determining
more accurately the status of the species on Lombok is
an urgent priority.
Forktail 21 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
153
Australian Hobby Falco longipennis
Pre-1930. Everett collected one specimen of the race
hanieli from Baian (Bayan) at 214 m on Gunung
Rinjani (Hartert 1896b). Hartert (1896b) commented
‘this is, I think, the most western locality where this
species has ever been found’. This would appear to be
correct more than a century later, with no records of
either the resident or Austral migrant race west of
Wallace’s Line (Coates and Bishop 1997, MacKinnon
and Phillipps 1993).
Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis
Pre-1930. This species is known from Lombok only
from single male and female specimens collected at
2,000 m on Segara Anak, Gunung Rinjani (Rensch
1931). It is otherwise a locally common resident in the
Lesser Sundas (Coates and Bishop 1997) and Java and
Bali (MacKinnon and Phillipps 1993).
White-faced Heron Egretta novaehollandiae
Pre-1930. Rensch (1931) collected two males at Swela
and a juvenile female at Labuhan Haji, stating that the
species is found at 0-400 m. Everett collected two
skins (Hartert 1896b). Coates and Bishop (1997)
stated the species breeds on Flores, Sumba, Roti and
‘probably Lombok’. However, there are no recent
records from Lombok.
Pacific Reef Egret Egretta sacra
Pre-1930. One juvenile and an adult male were
collected at Tanjung Luar by Rensch (1931). This
species is described as widespread and locally common
in Wallacea (Coates and Bishop 1997), and it is
surprising that there have been no recent records on
Lombok.
Grey Heron Ardea cinerea
There have been three recent records: two were seen at
a small (2 ha) tidal wetland behind fishponds in the far
south-west of Lombok in June 2000; one was seen at
Bangko Banglco in December 2004; and one was
recorded at Gili Meno in December 2004 (C. R.
Trainor in litt. 2005). This species has previously been
recorded from Sumba (Verhoeye and Holmes 1999)
and Sumbawa (Grantham 2000c, White and Bruce
1986), and it is common from Bali westwards in the
Greater Sundas (personal observations).
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus
Pre-1930. Everett (Hartert 1896b) collected one
specimen and Rensch (1931) recorded one at Swela.
Although this is not an especially secretive species
(SDM personal observations), there are no recent
records on Lombok.
Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi
Critically Endangered. A female was reported in
Lembar harbour in 1988 by Johnstone et al. (1993).
This species has its sole breeding site on Christmas
Island but ranges widely as far the Andaman Sea and
Hong Kong (Marchant and Higgins 1990).
Elegant Pitta Pitta elegans
Doherty collected specimens from 300-1,200 m
(Hartert 1896a), while Everett’s specimens were from
‘the low country’ to 900 m (Hartert 1896b). Rensch
(1931) heard this species at Ekas in coastal lowlands of
the south-east. There are two recent records from the
middle slopes of Gunung Rinjani (Myers 1995,
Thomas 1 994). This Wallacean near-endemic is locally
common to rare throughout its range (Coates and
Bishop 1997).
Scaly-crowned Honeyeater Lichmera lombokia
Restricted-range. This montane species was recorded
by most collectors prior to 1930 and by most subse¬
quent observers. It also occurs on Sumbawa and
Flores, and is generally common in wooded habitats
above 800 m (Coates and Bishop 1997, Stattersfield et
al. 1998).
Mangrove Whistler Pachycephala grisola
In Wallacea, this species occurs only on Lombok,
where it is described as common in a variety of habitats
(Coates and Bishop 1997). It was recorded by all but
one pre-1930 observer, but only by two recent
observers, presumably because of a lack of effort
outside forested areas.
Scarlet Minivet Pericrocotus flammeus
This is another species known in Wallacea only from
Lombok. Coates and Bishop (1997) indicated that
there were no recent records. However, there are
unpublished observations by Lansley (1986), Myers
(1995), Garcia (1997) and Thomas (1994) from mid¬
altitudes on the slopes of Gunung Rinjani.
Pied Fantail Rhipidura javanica
This species is listed for Lombok following a single
record of a bird at Sengiggi (M. D. Bruce in Andrew
1992). There are no other Wallacean records.
Ashy Drongo Dicrurus leucophaeus
This species is known from Wallacea only on Lombok,
where all pre-1930 observers except Kuroda (1930)
recorded the species. It appears to be moderately
common on Gunung Rinjani, as it has been recorded
by all recent visitors. White and Bruce (1986) stated
that the species occurs up to 396 m, but Everett
(Hartert 1896b) found it up to 1,220 m and Thomas
(1994) and SDM (1995) both observed it at 1,550 m
on Gunung Rinjani.
Chestnut-capped Thrush Zoothera interpres
Pre-1930. This species was collected by Wallace
(1863), Everett obtained a ‘very fine series of old and
young birds’ (Hartert 1896b), and Rensch (1931)
collected an adult and a juvenile male at Narmada at
200 m. There is an unconfirmed report of a sighting in
1988 at Tetebatu by Andrews (1989), but no further
details were provided. Elsewhere in the region it has
been recorded on Java, Sumbawa and Flores (very
common at some sites: KDB personal observations). It
appears to inhabit a wide range of habitats from
lowland to montane forests and degraded or
fragmented woodlands (Clement and Hathway 2000)
and even lightly wooded villages (KDB personal obser¬
vations).
154
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
Sunda Thrush Zoothera andromedae
Pre-1930.This species was collected byWallace (1863)
and Everett (Hartert 1896b) who recorded ‘a number
of young birds only’, mostly from c.360 m.
Unfortunately, no locality was given, but presumably
the records were from Gunung Rinjani. The species is
notably shy and may well have been overlooked by
recent observers.
Chestnut-backed Thrush Zoothera dohertyi
Near Threatened; restricted-range. This species is
referred to as ‘probably already extinct on Lombok’ in
BirdLife International (2000, 2001) and in Clement
and Hathway (2000). However, there have been a
number of recent sightings. During 1994, Thomas
(1994) recorded two pairs and two singles, including
individuals courtship feeding and carrying nest
material on Gunung Rinjani below Pos II, c.10 around
Pos II where a nest was found and a pair was observed
carrying food, and 15 individuals between Pos II and
Batu Koq. Myers (1995) observed two birds at close
range near Pos II at 1,570 m. Garcia (1997) flushed
one from the forest floor above Senaru on Gunung
Rinjani during August 1997. Elsewhere this beautiful
thrush occurs in primary hill and montane forest on
Sumbawa, Flores, Sumba and Timor (Coates and
Bishop 1997, Clement and Hathway 2000). There has
been intensive trapping pressure on Lombok and
Sumbawa during the 1990s; hundreds were found in
Mataram markets in 2000, with individual birds selling
for 10,000-20,000 Indonesian Rupiahs (C. R. Trainor
in litt. 2005).
Rufous-chested Flycatcher Ficedula dumetoria
Near Threatened. Although described in Coates and
Bishop (1997) as moderately common on Sumbawa
and Flores, but rare or absent elsewhere, this species
has been recorded regularly on Lombok, both histori¬
cally and recently. Doherty found it at 300-600 m
(Hartert 1896a), while Everett recorded it up to 450 m
(Hartert 1896b). Myers (1995) and Thomas (1994)
both found it below 600 m on Gunung Rinjani.
[Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa
ceylonensis
Rensch (1931) heard the song of a bird on Lombok
that he was not able to identify at the time. Later, on
Bali he heard a similar song and obtained specimens of
Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher. On this basis, he
postulated that the species possibly occurs on
Lombok.]
Black-winged Starling Sturnus melanopterus
Endangered. Everett (1896b) collected a ‘small series
of both sexes’ from the lowlands. Rensch (1931) did
not find it on Lombok (although it was very common
on Bali), and suggested that Everett’s records may have
referred to introduced or vagrant birds, but the fact
that one taken in June 1896 by Everett was a juvenile
suggests local resident status (White and Bruce 1986).
One was recorded at Senggigi in June 1993 by G. M.
Bass (in litt. 1993 to BirdLife International 2001).
White-vented Myna Acridotheres cinereus
Garcia (1997) found this species on the west coast,
where he observed two near Senggigi and two near
Pemenang during 1997. One was seen on Gili Meno
on 31 December 2004 (C. R. Trainor in litt. 2004).
Olive-backed Tailorbird Orthotomus sepium
Coates and Bishop (1997) described this species as a
common resident, and indeed nearly all observers in
historical and recent times have recorded it. It occurs
in Java and Bali, but in Wallacea it has been recorded
only on Lombok.
Red-chested Flowerpecker Dicaeum maugei
Restricted-range. Both historically and recently this
species has been found to be common on Lombok in a
variety of habitats at 0-600 m. It has an unusual,
disjointed distribution, being found only on Lombok
in the northern Lesser Sundas, but also on Timor and
satellite islands and on some of the small Banda
Islands (White and Bruce 1986, Coates and Bishop
1997).
Brown-throated Sunbird Anthreptes malacensis
This species has been recorded on Lombok only by
Johnstone at Kuta in 1988 and by van Balen on the
north-west coast in 1990 (Johnstone et al. 1993). Both
records are from areas rarely visited by recent
observers.
Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava
R. W. R. J. Dekker (in Johnstone et al. 1993) recorded
c.50 birds at Sekotong in 1991. Myers (1995) saw c.20
birds in paddyfields near Belanting in September
1995. This species is regularly recorded during the
northern winter throughout Wallacea (White and
Bruce 1986, Coates and Bishop 1997), although it has
not previously been listed for Lombok.
Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
Pre-1930. Rensch (1931) collected a male at Narmada
and a female at Poesock. He found the species to be
numerous in the mountains of Java and Lombok in
open uninhabited areas, with flocks of 10-20 birds at
Sembalun, and even a flock at 3,000 m on Gunung
Rinjani. Elsewhere in Wallacea, Grey Wagtail is
widespread and common to very common in montane
areas from mid-August to early May (Coates and
Bishop 1997).
Tawny-breasted Parrotfinch Erythrura hyperythm
Pre-1930. Everett collected a ‘fine series’ from
457-900 m (Hartert 1896b). In Wallacea, this species
is found in montane forest on Sulawesi (KDB personal
observations), Sumbawa and Flores (Verhoeye and
Holmes 1999), where it ranges from very rare to
moderately common (Coates and Bishop 1997,
personal observations). The absence of recent records
on Lombok probably reflects the lack of observer effort
at higher altitudes.
[Java Sparrow Lonchura oryzivora
Vulnerable; introduced; pre-1930. This species was
recorded byWallace (1863) and Rensch (1931) who
recorded single females at Narmada, Ekas and Swela.
Forktail 21 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
155
Coates and Bishop (1997) noted that the species was
probably introduced into the western Lesser Sundas. It
is classified as Vulnerable owing to intense trapping
pressure (BirdLife International 2001).]
DISCUSSION
Although Lombok is the fifth largest island in the
Lesser Sundas (albeit considerably smaller than the
first four), it supports a comparatively modest
avifauna, comprising 180 species recorded to date
(Appendix 2). Given Lombok’s close proximity to Bali
to the west, and Sumbawa to the east, and the fact that
it has the highest mountain in Wallacea (Gunung
Rinjani at 3,726 m), this seems somewhat surprising,
but it probably reflects to some degree the more
limited survey effort on Lombok.
Thirty-six species have not been recorded on
Lombok since 1930. Many have probably been simply
overlooked. A number are dependent upon freshwater
and/or brackish swamps and marshes, e.g. Stork-billed
Kingfisher, White-browed Crake and Common
Moorhen. They have almost certainly declined with the
extensive drainage and consequent disappearance of
their habitat, but most are widespread and generally
adventitious and it is likely that they still occur. Others
are forest or woodland species, but are not dependent
on lowland forest and hence are unlikely to have disap¬
peared, e.g. Wedge-tailed Green Pigeon (known from
1,220-2,900 m). Little Cuckoo Dove (750 m),
Chestnut-capped Thrush (200-1,300 m), Sunda
Thrush (460-920 m) and Tawny-breasted Parrotfinch
(from hills up to 1,220 m). Other forest- or woodland-
dependent species may be of greater concern, e.g.
Orange-footed Scrubfowl, Pacific Baza, Red-legged
Crake, Island Turtle Dove, Peaceful Dove, and Blue¬
eared, Small Blue, Oriental Dwarf and Stork-billed
Kingfishers. These species have likely been affected not
only by the clearance of Lombok’s lowland forests and
woodlands, but also by hunting, egg-collecting or
trapping for the cage-bird trade. The recently
unrecorded species of greatest concern are the globally
threatened Flores Green Pigeon and the Near
Threatened Cinnamon-collared Kingfisher. These
species are dependent upon forest and woodland,
especially at low elevations, for their survival, and this
habitat has been almost entirely cleared from Lombok.
A total of 42 species have been added to the
Lombok list in recent years. This total includes three
pelagic seabirds, nine Palaearctic migrant shorebirds,
six terns (largely migrants from the Palaearctic), one
Palaearctic migrant landbird and one Austral landbird
migrant, reflecting the preoccupation of the early
collectors with resident landbirds. The status on
Lombok of several of these species is not yet clear, e.g.
Slaty-breasted Rail and Pied Imperial Pigeon.
However, Asian Palm Swift, Grey-rumped Treeswift,
Golden Whistler, Brown-throated Sunbird and White-
vented Myna may all have recently colonised the island
in response to the development of open habitats and
plantations which now predominate in the lowlands.
A number of species, including Dark-backed
Imperial Pigeon, Flores Hawk Eagle, White-rumped
Kingfisher, Chestnut-backed Thrush, Scaly-crowned
Honeyeater and Red-chested Flowerpecker, are
dependent to varying degrees on the semi-evergreen
rainforest and montane forest in Gunung Rinjani
National Park. Clearly, this one national park on
Lombok is of paramount importance for conservation
of the island’s birds. However, many of the species of
conservation priority are reliant to various extents on
habitat that lies outside the national park, and this
requires protection too.
This review highlights the lack of recent thorough
surveys on Lombok: only a handful of ornithologists
have visited the island in recent years, and usually only
for a short duration. As an illustration of the potential
for birdwatchers to add to our current knowledge of
birds on the island, Ash (1984, 1993) showed that
significant numbers of diurnal raptors migrate
eastwards over Bali towards Lombok, including
Japanese Sparrowhawk Accipiter gularis and Chinese
Sparrowhawk A. soloensis, but neither of these species
has yet been confirmed to occur on Lombok.
We recommend that future surveys should focus on
species of conservation importance and those species
not recorded in recent years, on Gunung Rinjani
(including its full altitudinal range) and in any remain¬
ing lowland forest or woodland areas, such as Batu
Gendang forest. Key wetlands including Segara Anak
crater lake, Praya reservoir, Gili Meno lake, Batu
Gendang cliffs, Lembar mudflats and other beaches
and mudflats should be targeted for migrant shorebirds
other waterbirds. Migrating Palearctic raptors should
be systematically surveyed during September-
November.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sincere thanks to Colin Trainor for his initial suggestion that this
paper would be of value, and for many subsequent helpful
comments. We are especially grateful to all correspondents who so
helpfully provided details of their records: Peter Ames, E. F. J.
Garcia, Peter Lansley, Vincent Nijman and Richard Thomas. We
would like to express our admiration for the early ornithologists who
contributed so greatly to our present-day knowledge of this still little-
studied region. Thanks also to Leonie Lemmer, librarian at the
Australian Museum in Sydney, Walter Boles also of the Australian
Museum, and David’s daughter Brioney.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P. (1992) The birds of Indonesia: a checklist ( Peter’s Sequence).
Kukila Checklist No. 1 Jakarta. Indonesian Ornithological
Society.
Andrews, T. (1989) Birding in Indonesia. Unpublished trip report.
Ash, J. S. (1984) Bird observations on Bali. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 104:
24-35.
Ash, J. S. (1993) Raptor migration on Bali, Indonesia. Forktail 9:
3-11.
van Bemmel, A. C.V. (1940) Ornithologische Notizen I-III. Treubia 17:
333-335.
BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona,
Spain and Cambridge, U.K.: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
156
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
BirdLife International (2005) Species factsheet: Flores Hawk-eagle
Spizaetus floris. Available at http://www.birdlife.org.
Boon, L. (1996) Some further new records of shorebirds from
Lombok. Kukila 8: 148-149.
Burton, K. M. (1989) Three new shorebirds for Lombok. Kukila 4
(1-2): 65.
Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Davies, C. W. N., Dharmaputra,
G., Dutson, G., Lowen, J. C. and Sahu, H. (1996) The conser¬
vation status of forest birds on Flores and Sumbawa, Indonesia.
Bird Conserv. Internat. 6: 335-370.
Clement, P. and Hathway, R. (2000) Thrushes. London: Christopher
Helm.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds ofWallacea.
Alderley, Australia: Dove Publications.
Elbert, J. (1911) Die Sunda-Expedition des Vereins fur Geographic und
Statistik su Frankfurt am Main. [ The Sunda expedition of the associ¬
ation for geography and statistics of Frankfurt! Main] Vols. 1: 7—10,
21, 30, 37, 57, 72, 105. Frankfurt: Hermann Minjon.
Garcia, E. F. J. (1997) Observations in Lombok, Indonesia, 19-29
August, 1997. Unpublished report.
Gibbs, D. (1990) Wallacea. Unpublished report.
Gjershaug, J. O., Kvaloy, K., Rov, N., Prawiradilaga, D. M.,
Suparman, U. and Rahman, Z. (2004) The taxonomic status of
Flores Hawk Eagle Spizaetus floris. Forktail 20: 55-62
Grantham, M. (2000a) Record of Hardhead (White-eyed Duck)
from Lombok. Kukila 11: 136-137.
Grantham, M. (2000b) Matsudaira’s Storm-petrel: second record
for the Lombok Strait. Kukila 1 1: 138-139.
Grantham, M. (2000c) New and interesting records from West
Sumbawa .Kukila 11: 139-141.
Hartert, E. (1896a) An account of the collections of birds made by
Mr. William Doherty in the eastern archipelago. Novit. Zool. 3:
537-576.
Hartert, E. (1896b) List of a collection of birds made in Lombok by
Mr. Alfred Everett. Novit. Zool. 3: 591-599.
Hayman, R, Marchant, J. and Prater, T. (1986) Shorebirds: an identi¬
fication guide to the waders of the world. London: Christopher
Helm.
Horst, O. (1935) Een tocht naar de Segara Anak, het kratermeer van
den Rindjani, Lombok. [An excursion to Segara Anak, the crater
of Rindjani, Lombok] Trop. Nat. 24: 179-186.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (1997) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 4. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (2001) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 6. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Johnstone, E. R., van Balen, S. and Dekker, R. W. R. (1993) New
bird records for the island of Lombok. Kukila 6 (2): 124-127.
Kuroda, N. (1930) A collection of birds from Java, Bali and Lombok.
Tori 6: 65-103.
Lane, B. A. and Rogers, D. I. (2000) The taxonomic and conserva¬
tion status of the Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula
( benghalensis ) australis. Stilt 36: 26-34.
Lansley, P. S. (1986) Lombok, Indonesia 13-15 December 1986.
Unpublished report.
Lincoln, G. A. (1975) Bird counts either side of Wallace’s Line. J.
Zool. Fond. 177: 349-361.
Marchant, S. and Higgins, P. J. eds. (1990) Handbook of Australian,
New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Marchant, S. and Higgins, P. J. eds. (1993) Handbook of Australian,
New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 2. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Mayr, E. (1944) Wallace’s Line in the light of recent zoogeographic
studies. Quart. Rev. Biol. 19: 1-14.
Monk, K. A., de Fretes, Y. and Reksodiharjo-Lilley, G. (1997) The
ecology of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku. Singapore: Periplus.
Morrison, J. (2001) Lesser Sundas deciduous forests. WWF
Ecoregion Report. Available at: www.worldwildlife.org/
wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/aa/aa020 l_full.html.
Myers, S. D. (1995) Lombok trip report September 1995.
Unpublished report.
Nash, S. V. and Nash, A. D. (1986) An observation of Pied Imperial
Pigeons Ducula bicolor on Air Islet, the first record for Lombok.
Kukila 3: 48-49.
Rensch, B. (1931) Die Vogelwelt von Lombok, Sumbawa und Flores.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologishen Museum in Berlin. [Reports from
the Zoological museum in Berlin.] 17: 451-637.
RePPProt (1989) Review of phase 1 results. Maluku and Nusa
Tenggara. Vol 1. Jakarta: Regional Physical Planning Programme
for Transmigration.
Sangster, G. and Rozendaal, F. G. (2004) Territorial songs and
species-level taxonomy of nightjars of the Caprimulgus macrurus
complex, with the description of a new species. Zool. Verb. Leiden
350: 7-45.
Schmutz, E. (1977) Die Vogel der Manggarai (Flores). [The birds of
Manggarai, (Flores).] Privately published.
Somidikarta, S. and Holmes, D. A. (1979) An influx of Australian
Pelicans Pelecanus conspicillatus in Indonesia. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club
102: 94-95.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conserva¬
tion. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Trainor, C. (2002a) Birds of Gunung Tambora, Sumbawa,
Indonesia: effects of altitude, the 1815 cataclysmic volcanic
eruption and trade. Forktail 18: 49-61.
Trainor, C. (2002b) The birds of Adonara, Lesser Sundas,
Indonesia. Forktail 19: 93-100.
Trainor, C. (2003) The birds of Lembata (Lomblen), Lesser Sundas.
Kukila 12: 39-53.
Trainor, C. and Lesmana, D. (2000) Exploding volcanoes, unique birds,
gigantic rats and elegant ikat: identifying sites of international conser¬
vation significance on Flores, East Nusa Tenggara. Bogor, Indonesia:
Birdlife International-Indonesia Programme Report No. 18.
UNDP/FAO (1982) National conservation plan for Indonesia. Vol 4.
Nusa Tenggara. Field Report of UNDP/FAO National Parks
Development Project INS/78/061 . Jakarta: UNDP/FAO.
Verhoeye, J. and Holmes, D. A. (1999) The birds of the islands of
Flores: a review. Kukila 10: 3-59.
Vorderman, A. G. (1895) Lombok- Vogels. [Lombok birds] Natuurk.
Tijdschr. Nederlandsch-Indie 54: 327-353.
Wallace, A. R. (1863) A list of the birds inhabiting the islands of
Timor, Flores, and Lombock, with descriptions of the new
species. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1863: 18-32.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. San Diego:
Academic Press.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds ofWallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands). London:
British Ornithologists’ Union.
S. D. Myers, 13 Ryan Street, Brunswick East, Victoria 3057, Australia. Email: myers_susan@yahoo.com.au
K. D. Bishop, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 9430505020, U.S.A. Correspondence:
BO. Box 1234,Armidale, NS IV 2350, Australia. Email: kdbishop@ozemail.com.au
Forktail 21 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
157
APPENDIX 2
List of all species recorded on Lombok
158
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
Forktail 21 (2005)
A review of historic and recent bird records from Lombok, Indonesia
159
160
SUSAN D. MYERS and K. DAVID BISHOP
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
Square brackets indicate unconfirmed or introduced species
Status: CR: Critically Endangered; EN: Endangered; VU: Vulnerable; DD: Data Deficient; NT: Near Threatened; rr: restricted-range.
Pre- 1 930: W: Wallace (1856);V: Vorderman (1894); D: Doherty (1896); E: Everett (1896); R: Rensch (1927); K: Kuroda (1929); Misc:
miscellaneous sources.
Recent: L: Lansley (1986); A: Ames in 1988 (P. Ames in litt. 1989); J: Johnstone, van Balen and Dekker in 1990 (Johnstone et al. 1993):T:
Thomas in 1994 (Thomas 1994); M: Myers (1995); G: Garcia (1997); B: Gibbs (1990); Misc: miscellaneous sources.
'Grantham (2000a)
‘White and Bruce (1986) give sources for records from Sulawesi and Sula and say ‘it probably occurs more widely in Wallacea’, but this
appears to be unsubstantiated, and its presence on Lombok requires confirmation.
’Sangster and Rozendaal (2004)
‘Boon (1996)
‘Burton (1989)
'’Somidikarta and Holmes (1979)
‘Grantham (2000b)
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
161
First nesting observations of the Negros Bleeding-
heart Gallicolumba keayi from Panay, Philippines
E. M. SLADE, J. F. VILLANUEVA, B. TACUD and E. CURIO
Of the seven species of bleeding-heart doves, five occur
in the Philippines: Luzon Bleeding-heart Gallicolumba
luzonica, Mindoro Bleeding-heart G. platenae,
Mindanao Bleeding-heart G. criniger , Sulu Bleeding-
heart G. menagei and Negros Bleeding-heart G. keayi.
Previously, lumped as a single species, the five forms
are now classified as closely related allospecies which
evolved on separate islands (Gibbs et al. 2001).
Bleeding-heart doves are characterised by a golden or
red patch on the breast. All are terrestrial, living singly
or in pairs, and feeding on seeds, berries and inverte¬
brates (Gibbs et al. 2001).
Negros Bleeding-heart, once thought to be endemic
to Negros, was discovered on the neighbouring island
of Panay in 1996 by the Philippine Endemic Species
Conservation Project (PESCP; Klop et al. 1998). The
first behavioural observations of the Panay birds, made
largely in captivity, suggested that there where no
morphological differences between the Negros and
Panay forms (Curio 2001). The species is shy and
secretive, and thus is very difficult to observe in the
wild. Populations on both Negros and Panay are
thought to be small and decreasing owing to extensive
deforestation and destruction of forest habitat, which is
exacerbated by hunting. The species is listed as
Critically Endangered (BirdLife International 2004).
Only described in 1900, Negros Bleeding-heart was
the last of the five Philippine endemic bleeding-hearts
to be discovered (Clarke 1900, Dickinson et al. 1991).
Thus, data for this species are scarce and there have
been few observations in the wild, with the only
detailed observations coming from a wild bird, caught
during banding operations by PESCP, and held in a
rehabilitation cage in the Panay forest for one and a
half years (Curio 2001). The only previous nest of
Negros Bleeding-heart was found in the north-west
Panay peninsula in March 1999, but the two eggs were
depredated within a day of discovery (Curio 2001).
Here we report on the first observations of a successful
nest.
METHODS
Observations were made from a ridge opposite the
nest, 15-20 m away, using a spotting scope, and 10x42
binoculars; photographs were taken from within a few
metres of the nest after the adult birds had taken flight.
The nest was observed from 30 May to 13 June 2003.
Approaching the nest without the sitting parent taking
flight proved difficult, as approach to the nest was
either round a bend in the riverbed or over the ridge
opposite the nest, c. 15-20 m away. At the first sign of
movement the parent would take flight, and despite the
observer sitting in silence on the ridge, the adult would
not reappear until the observer had gone. Thus, obser¬
vations on parental care were not risked, and the nest
was only observed for periods of 30 minutes every 2-3
days. Photographs of the nest and hatchlings were
taken using a digital camera (A. Schneider) and a video
camera (E. Slade), with a zoom to avoid getting too
close to the nest.
RESULTS
A nest of Negros Bleeding-heart was discovered on the
bank of a seasonally dry river bed in primary forest,
c.500 m from the research station research station of
PESCP, in Sibaliw (11°49'N 121"58'E), Buruanga
municipality, Aklan province, Philippines. This area is
located on the north-west Panay peninsula mountain
range at an average elevation of 450 m, and it consists
largely of virgin lowland forest partly intersected by
secondary growth. The climate on the peninsula is
perhumid (Dickinson et al., 1991).
The nest was placed amidst the leaves of a flat,
epiphytic ‘bird’s-nesf fern, attached to a small tree.
The vegetation around the nest was dense. The nest
was c.l m above the ground, and made of loosely
arranged twigs, and lined with the tendrils of vines
(Plate 1). The nest was first discovered on 30 May
2003, when an adult sitting on the nest was flushed
accidentally, revealing two glossy white eggs.
On 31 May, one of the eggs had hatched. The chick
had a light coating of white down, and the eyes had not
opened yet (Plate 2). By 2 June, the second chick had
hatched. By 6 June, one chick had its eyes open, and
primary feathers mostly in quills were visible on both
chicks (Plate 3). No vocalisations were ever heard from
the chicks. On 9 and 10 June, the young had full
feathers and seemed almost ready for fledging. The
young were brown, with a small whitish patch on the
throat/chest and three wing-bars (two prominent, and
the third small, perhaps because of less-developed
feathers (Plate 4). The wing-bars seemed to have less
buff than Mindanao Bleeding-heart juveniles (as illus¬
trated in Gibbs et al. 2001). The nest was not
approached closely after this date, and no further
photos were taken, to prevent the chicks leaving the
nest prematurely. However, the nest was still observed
from the top of the ridge, and fledging of the first chick
was recorded on 12 June, followed by the second chick
on 13 June.
DISCUSSION
These are the first observations on the nesting of
Negros Bleeding-heart. The only other previously
known nest also had a clutch of two white eggs, and
was placed in a very similar nest site. However, obser-
162
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Plate 1. Negros Bleeding-heart nest on epiphytic fern, Panay.
Photograph by A. Schneider.
Plate 3. Negros Bleeding-heart chicks at seven and eight
days old. Photograph by E. Slade.
vations on the hatching and fledging of the chicks were
not obtained owing to predation of the nest a day after
discovery (Curio 2001). Research station staff have
also reported three other suspected Negros Bleeding-
heart nests, all of which were depredated within 1-2
days of discovery.
The timing of breeding appears to be slightly later
than the previous record for Panay, where eggs were
found in the first week of March, but is more similar to
records for Mindoro, Mindanao and Luzon Bleeding-
hearts, for which nestlings have been recorded in late
April and May (Dickinson et al. 1991, Gibbs et al.
2001). Although information on nesting behaviour for
all bleeding-hearts is scarce, nests are typically placed
at similar heights from the ground (1-2 m) and usually
in bushes, horizontal branches of small trees or tangles
of vines. As with Negros Bleeding-heart, the nests were
made of sticks, lined with the tendrils of vines and
incorporated leaves, bamboo and greenery (Gibbs et al.
2001). Interestingly, both nests discovered so far in
Panay, and three other suspected nests of Negros
Bleeding-heart have been similar, being situated 1-2 m
above the ground in epiphytic ferns, and made of loose
twigs, with two eggs. None of the other species have so
Plate 2. Negros Bleeding-heart chick at one day old.
Photograph by A. Schneider.
Plate 4. Negros Bleeding-heart chicks at nine and ten days
old. Photograph by E. Slade.
far been reported to utilise bird’s nests ferns. However,
of three nests reported for Golden-heart G. rufigula of
New Guinea, one was on a ‘shelf-like platform
provided by a bird’s nest fern’ (Rand 1942). Luzon and
Mindoro Bleeding-heart also lay two eggs, although
the colour was described as ‘bluish-white’ and ‘pale
creamy’ respectively, compared to the glossy white eggs
of Negros Bleeding-heart, which had no blue tinge.
Mindanao Bleeding-heart appears to lay only one
creamy-white egg (Gibbs et al. 2001).
The nestling period is short, with complete feathers
by 9-10 days, and fledging after only 12 days. Such a
short nesting period seems typical of bleeding-hearts,
with nestlings of both Luzon and Mindanao Bleeding-
hearts reported to fledge after only 12 and 16 days
respectively, even before the tail feathers were fully
grown (Goodwin 1967, Gibbs et al. 2001). In captivity,
fledging of Luzon Bleeding-heart chicks takes 14-16
days, and full adult plumage is not reached until 10-12
weeks (Hibbert 1997). The short nestling period is
presumably an adaptation to the vulnerability of the
open and low nest.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
163
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work of the PESCP is formalised under the aegis of a
Memorandum of Agreement with the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (Quezon city, Philippines), and the help of
the Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (Director: W. S. Pollisco) is
gratefully acknowledged. We are indebted to Antonie Schneider for
the photographs. Further vital help was given by PESCP station
staff, especially F. Geronimo. The project is sponsored by the
Frankfurt Zoological Society, further generous support came from
Ernst Mayr. This paper is publication No. 59 of the Philippine
Endemic Species Conservation Project of the Frankfurt Zoological
Society, in close co-operation with Aklan State University (President:
Dr B. Palma), partner of the PESCP.
REFERENCES
Birdlife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: Birdlife International.
Clarke, W. E. (1900) On some birds from the island of Negros,
Philippines. Part IV. Ibis 7(6): 351-361.
Curio, E. (2001) Taxonomic status of the Negros Bleeding-heart
Gallicolumba keayi from Panay, Philippines, with notes on its
behaviour. Forktail 17: 13 19.
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines. Tring, U.K.: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list no. 12).
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E. and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Goodwin, D. (1967) Pigeons and doves of the world. London: British
Museum (Natural History).
Hibbert, C. A. (1997) Bleeding-heart pigeon Gallicolumba luzonica:
aviculture a tool for conservation. Melbourne: Conservation
Committee of the Avicultural Federation of Australia.
Klop, E., Curio, E. and de Soye, Y. (1998) A new population of
bleeding-heart pigeon ( Gallicolumba sp.) and its conservation
relevance on Panay, Philippines. J. Omithol. 139: 76-77.
Rand, A. L. (1942) Results of the Archbold Expedition. No. 42. Bull.
Amer. Mus. Novit. 79: 289-366.
E. M. Slade, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, U.K. Email:
eleanor.slade@zoo.ox.ac.uk
J. F. Villanueva, Block 5, Lot 5, Fortune Towne, Barangay Estefania, Bacolod City, 6100, Philippines. Email:
ierome.villanueva22@yahoo.com
B. Tacud, Philippine Endemic Species Conservation Project, Pandan, Antique, Philippines.
E. Curio, Conservation Biology Unit, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. Email:
eberhard.curio@rub.de
Observations on the nesting and parental
behaviour of Ashy-headed Laughingthrush
Garrulax cinereifrons
ASHOKA JAYARATHNA, PRASANJITH CALDERA, and EBEN GOODALE
Ashy-headed Laughingthrush Garrulax cinereifrons is
endemic to Sri Lanka, where it is restricted to wet
lowland rainforest in the south-west of the country. It
is considered Vulnerable because it has a small, declin¬
ing population and range, which is also severely
fragmented, owing to clearance and degradation of its
forest habitat (BirdLife International 2001). The nest
of the species was first recorded in 1984 (Banks and
Banks 1987), 132 years after the species was discov¬
ered, and incubation and parental care have not yet
been described (Henry 1998).
We observed the nesting of this species while
conducting a long-term field study of mixed-species
bird flocks in the Sinharaja World Heritage Reserve
(6°26'N 80°21'E, 450 m). Laughingthrushes are
common members of mixed-species flocks, being
found in 47% of such flocks, and with 91% of individ¬
uals observed within mixed-species flocks (Kotagama
and Goodale 2004). We observed a group of seven
laughingthrushes, two of which we had banded
(red/white was banded in August 2001, and pink/pink
in September 2003).
Nest
On 24 December 2003, we saw the laughingthrush
group by a nest that appeared to be almost complete.
It was placed c.1.5 m from a stream in a liana Calamus
zeylonicus of 33 mm diameter, which climbed approxi¬
mately 20 m into the canopy. The nest was 5.3 m
above ground, nestled between the stem and a leaf
petiole. The outside of the nest was made of twigs with
some dead leaves; the diameter was c. 140 mm, and the
height was 1 1 5 mm. The internal dimensions of the
nest cup were 109 x 97 mm wide, and it was 72 mm
deep. The inside of the nest was made of fine roots and
vines, probably of Lygodium sp. The details of the nest
are thus similar to those reported by Banks and Banks
(1987) although the timing of nesting is different:
Banks and Banks observed nesting in April. Recently,
however, two other nests were found in the Sinharaja
reserve in November (Warakagoda 2003) and
December (Siriwardhene 2004).
Eggs
On the morning of 27 December there were no eggs in
the nest, but at 07h00 on 28 December, there were
three eggs, which is surprising given that birds
164
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
normally lay at 24-hour intervals. The eggs were green-
blue and unspotted; they measured 19.9 x 25.8 mm,
19.6 x 24.9 mm, and 19.6 x 24.8 mm. These dimen¬
sions are comparable with the 18 x 25 mm reported by
Banks and Banks (1987).
Nesting behaviour
Observations of nesting behaviour were conducted
with 8 x 42 binoculars from a concealed position 15m
from the nest. Before egg-laying, the nest was infre¬
quently visited by two laughingthrushes, although the
entire group roosted c.20 m away. Incubation was
carried out by at least two birds, although neither of
the ringed birds were observed incubating. Usually, the
group would approach to within 5-10 m of the nest,
and one bird would fly directly to the nest to take over
incubation. Incubation change-overs occurred every
10-30 minutes during early morning (07h00-08h00)
and late evening (17h30- 18h30), but much less
frequently during most of the day (every 60-90
minutes). The group only rarely interacted with other
species during incubation and remained within an area
of about 150-200 m diameter, considerably smaller
than the area they normally occupied.
On 1 1 January 2004, we noticed more frequent
incubation change-overs, with three birds coming to
the nest for the first time. On the next morning we
confirmed that all three eggs had hatched. In contrast
to incubation, all group members participated in
feeding the chicks. Usually, the group approached the
nest together, with birds sequentially feeding the
chicks; the last bird to feed would then brood the
chicks. Both ringed birds fed the chicks. Time intervals
between feeding were similar to the intervals between
incubation change-overs. The flock continued to move
within the same small area and to use the same
roosting site. Food items delivered to the nest appeared
to be mostly insects, including small caterpillars, moths
and grasshoppers.
At C.17h00 on 21 January, we found the group
below the nest, uttering mobbing calls, and the nest
was empty, presumably having been depredated. The
day before we had noted the laughingthrush group
mobbing a Sri Lanka Blue Magpie Urocissa ornata that
approached within 1 2 m of the nest. It is possible that
the magpie was the nest predator, since it is known to
have depredated the nests of two other species in the
same area (Chaminda Ratnayake verbally 2004). Nest
predation appears to be a high risk for this species, as
three of the four nests that have been observed have
been predated, with the exception being the nest seen
by Siriwardhene (2004), found three days before all the
chicks fledged.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the Sri Lanka Forest Department for permis¬
sion to work in the Sinharaja World Heritage Reserve. Uromi
Goodale generously lent us her camera, and Thandula Jayarathna
helped with the observations. We thank Prof. Sarath Kotagama for
his advice and comments on the manuscript, which was also
improved by discussions with Chaminda Ratnayake, Mahendra
Siriwardhane and Deepal Warakagoda.
REFERENCES
Banks, J. and Banks, J. (1987) A note on the first discovery of the
nest and eggs of the Ashy-headed Babbler Garrulax cinereifrons,
an endemic species of Sri Lanka, in 1984. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 84: 682-683.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Henry, G. M. (1998) A guide to the birds of Ceylon. Third edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kotagama, S. W. and Goodale, E. (2004) The composition and
spatial organisation of mixed-species flocks in a Sri Lankan
rainforest. Forktail 20: 63-70.
Siriwardhene, M. (2004) The first successful nest of the Ashy-headed
Laughingthrush discovered in Sinharaja. Malkoha 26(2): 4.
Warakagoda, D. (2003) Second record of nest of Ashy-headed
Laughing-thrush. Ceylon Bird Club Notes 2003: 175.
Ashoka Jayarathna, Sinharaja Road, Kudawa, Weddagala, Sri Lanka.
Prasanjith Caldera, 37013 Thiriwanaketiya, Ratnapura, Sri Lanka. Email: prasanjith@sltnet.lk
Eben Goodale, Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 U.S.A. Email:
egoodale@bio.umass.edu
First record of Lesser Adjutant
Leptoptilos javanicus for Bhutan
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
At about 16h00 on 25 September 2004, I observed a
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus in flight over
Mathanguri (26°48'N 90"58'E) on the border between
India (Manas National Park, Baksa district, Assam)
and Bhutan (Royal Manas National Park). The bird
circled over both sides of the border, before landing in
a small marsh 1 km from the border on the Indian side,
from where my observations were made.
The bird was easily identified by its^long stout bill,
glossy black upperparts and white underparts. Greater
Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius was eliminated by the glossy
black (not bluish-grey) upperparts, lack of grey greater
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
165
coverts and tertials, naked orange-yellow (not reddish-
orange) neck and head, and lack of large white neck-ruff.
Lesser Adjutant is common in Baksa district, but
this was the first time I had seen one near Mathanguri,
despite regular visits to Manas National Park since the
1980s (although most were during the drier winter
season when the small marsh near Mathanguri dries
out). Previously, on 31 July 2004, I saw up to ten
Lesser Adjutant soaring above Doomni tea garden,
also in Baksa district, Assam, 5 km from the interna¬
tional border. On 26 October 2004, four were seen
flying southwards high over the eastern part of Manas
National Park within 6 km of the international border.
While the species may not be a regular visitor at
Mathanguri, it is likely to occur more frequently in the
east of Baksa district and in Udalguri district (near
Daifam in Bhutan), where paddy fields have replaced
forest right up to the international border in places.
Only two species of stork had been previously
recorded in Bhutan: Black Stork Ciconia nigra and
Woolly-necked Stork C. episcopus (Grimmett et al. 1998,
Inskipp et al. 1999). Lesser Adjutant had not previously
been recorded, although it is found in good numbers in
Assam (Choudhury 2000) and in varying abundance
elsewhere in India and South-East Asia to the Greater
Sundas. It is listed as Vulnerable because it has a small
population which is declining as a result of habitat loss
and degradation, hunting and disturbance (BirdLife
International 2004).
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Choudhury, A. U. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati: Gibbon
Books and WWF-India.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T. and Grimmett, R. (1999) Birds of Bhutan.
London and Thimphu: Christopher Helm and WWF-Bhutan.
Anwaruddin Choudhury, Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate) , Baksa district. Correspondence: Rhino
Foundation, Guwahati 781021, India. Email: badru 1 (uisify.com
Foraging techniques of the Chinese Pond Heron
Ardeola bacchus
STEPHANIE J. TYLER
Members of the heron family (Ardeidae) most
commonly forage either by ‘standing still’ and awaiting
prey, in an upright or crouched posture, then spearing
the prey when it comes within reach, or by ‘walking
slowly’ searching for prey on land or in shallow water
(del Hoyo et al. 1992). Sometimes birds will move
faster or even run after prey. ‘Foot-probing’ where a
foot is probed into the mud, or ‘foot-stirring’ where a
foot is rapidly moved about in mud, water or vegeta¬
tion are also frequently used techniques by some
species. Rarely, aerial fly-catching or diving may be
employed; so too the techniques of ‘hovering’, where a
bird flies over water, pausing in mid air to capture prey,
or ‘hovering-stirring’ where the bird strikes the water
surface with its legs to confuse prey.
Foraging techniques used by Chinese Pond Herons
Ardeola bacchus are little known (del Hoyo et al. 1992)
but birds most commonly appear to use the techniques
of ‘standing still’ or ‘walking slowly’. The following
brief observations on Chinese Pond Herons were made
in Vietnam between September 2003 and February
2004.
In rural areas of Vietnam, birds were frequently
seen throughout the day using the ‘standing still’
technique, hunched by ditches or in rice paddies,
awaiting an opportunity to lunge at and spear prey, or
‘walking slowly’ after prey. However, at a lake, Ho Bay
Mau (c.500 x 250 m), in Lenin Park in Hanoi in
northern Vietnam, Chinese Pond Herons fed in a very
different way. Numbers varied during the six-month
period from less than a dozen to over 80. Pond herons
roosted for much of the day in trees on a small island
in the lake. Their peaks of foraging activity were, as in
Hong Kong (del Hoyo et al. 1992), just after dawn and
before dusk, but hunting was observed throughout the
day, particularly in the morning up to 10h30.
Pond herons typically flew out from tree perches to
snatch prey that they had spotted on the surface of the
lake. During part of the observation period there were
large numbers of dead and dying fish available because
of high nutrient levels from storm overflows and
sewage drains, and consequent low oxygen levels in the
water. A total lack of aquatic or emergent vegetation
exacerbated the problem. Another frequent technique
was for one or more pond herons to fly out from the
island and fly over the surface of the lake. The bird(s)
thereby frightened shoals of fish which then swam
quickly close to the surface where the bird(s) could
catch them. Forays by groups of pond herons, which
were reminiscent of the feeding behaviour of marsh
terns Chlidonias spp., lasted for several minutes with
the birds flapping slowly across the lake, sometimes
dropping lower or stalling for a closer look. On seeing
prey a bird dangled its legs down and beat its wings
rapidly to maintain its position, hovering over the spot.
It then dropped feet first into the water, quickly snatch¬
ing the fish in its bill before rising from the water and
flying to the island trees to eat the fish. Sometimes the
166
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
birds’ feet dangled in the water, apparently ‘hovering-
stirring’ or a bird rested or swam, duck-like on the
water, for a few seconds (up to 16 s) before flapping up
again. Chinese Pond Herons have also been recorded
diving from perches up to 10 m high, and belly¬
flopping from a stone slab 1 m above the water
(Hancock and Elliott 1978), whilst ‘aerial feeding’ has
also been recorded in the Indian Pond Heron A. grayii.
Although prolonged flying bouts were presumably
energetically costly, the birds had a relatively high
success rate with on average, one in five or six forays
ending in the successful capture of a fish (>100 obser¬
vations). Birds were less successful in late January and
February, perhaps because in colder weather fish were
deeper and there were far fewer dead and dying fish
than in the autumn. Feeding at the lake edges was not
favoured because of the steep-walled banks, lack of
vegetation and high levels of disturbance by people.
REFERENCES
Hancock, J. and Elliott, H. (1978) The herons of the world. New York:
Harper and Row.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. eds. (1992) Handbook of the
birds of the world. Vol. 1. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Stephanie J. Tyler, Yew Tree Cottage, Lone Lane, Penallt, Monmouthshire, NP25 4AJ, U.K.
Email: steph_tyler200 1 @hotmail.com
The call of Sykes’s Nightjar
Caprimulgus mahrattensis
TOM ROBERTS and BEN KING
The territorial call (or song) of Sykes’s Nightjar
Caprimulgus mahrattensis is described in Roberts
(1991) as comprising bouts of long continuous
churring. Compared to the call of the race of European
Nightjar breeding in Pakistan Caprimulgus europaeus
umuini, the calls carry less far (200-300 m vs. 500-600
m) and lack the changes in pitch that characterise the
calls of European Nightjar. Here we expand on these
differences with reference to sonagrams.
The calls of both species consist of long series of
hard, knocking notes rapidly repeated, producing a
hard churr (it could also be called a trill or rattle;
Fig. 1). The churr may continue for between 1-2
seconds and several minutes. The individual notes of
Sykes’s Nightjar are all roughly equal in pitch and rate:
c. 0.65-1. 35 kHz and c.34 notes/second. The call of the
European Nightjar differs in having regular and readily
discernible rate shifts and changes in pitch. The more
3
2
HWU
Caprimulgus mahrattensis Pakistan
King
Capnmulgus europaeus Pakistan
Roberts
Capnmulgus europaeus Europe
Roche
Figure 1. Comparison of the calls of Sykes’s Nightjar
Caprimulgus mahrattensis and European Nightjar C. europaeus.
Note the regular rate changes (accompanied by a slight pitch
shift) shown by European, but not Sykes’s Nightjar.
slowly delivered notes are given at a rate of c.26
notes/sec at 1.0-2. 5 kHz, while the faster notes are
repeated at a rate of c.44 notes/sec at 1.0-2. 2 kHz. The
calls of European Nightjar in Pakistan and Europe
appear to be similar (Fig. 1).
Sykes’s Nightjar breeds in Afghanistan, Pakistan
and north-western India (Peters 1940). The European
Nightjar breeds in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but
apparently not in India (Ripley 1982). Whilst the
breeding ranges of the two species overlap, they are
unlikely to be found together in the breeding season.
Sykes’s Nightjar prefers ‘semi-desert open tracts with
scattered dry tropical thorn scrub such as occurs in the
remnant uncultivated patches of the Indus plains and
in the sand dune and clay, flat, extensive deserts of
Sibi, Cholistan and the Thar’ (Roberts, 1991). The
European Nightjar prefers ‘hilly country with stony
slopes and rocky ridges but usually rather sparse
vegetative cover’ (Roberts 1991).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Jeff Groth prepared the sonagrams. John Fitzpatrick and Greg
Budney of the Macaulay Library of Natural 'Sounds at the
Laboratory of Ornithology at Cornell University provided tape
recording equipment and other assistance. J. C. Roche graciously
allowed use of his European Nightjar recording from Roche (1996).
REFERENCES
«
Peters, J. L. (1940) Check-list of birds of the world. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
167
Ripley, S. D. (1982) A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan. Roche, J. C. (1996) All the bird songs of Europe. London:
Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society. HarperCollins.
Roberts, T. j. (1991) The birds of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford
University Press.
Tom Roberts, Cae Gors, Rhoscefnhir, Nr Pentraeth, Anglesey, North Wales, LL75 8YU, U.K. Email:
tjrpaknatur@aol.com
Ben King, Ornithology Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York,
NY10024, U.S.A. Ziwat7.-kingbirdtours@earthlink.net
New and noteworthy bird records from
Sumatra, Indonesia
MUHAMMAD IQBAL
During 1999-2003, I carried out fieldwork in South
Sumatra province, Indonesia, at the following locations:
Pemulutan, Ogan Komering Lebak (November 1999);
Lebak Pampangan (June 2000, March 2001, February
2002, April 2002); Lebak Pedamaran (August 2001);
Lebak Tanjung (April-March 2003), Napalicin area,
Rawas river, Kerinci Seblat National Park (December
1999), Dempo mountain (February 2000) and Resort
Air Muara Padang, Padang-Sugihan Wildlife Reserve
(November 1999). During fieldwork I made observa¬
tions of a number of species of significance, which are
described below.
Coordinates of sites mentioned in the text are as
follows: Lebak Pemulutan (03°09'S 104°45'E), Lebak
Pampangan (03°21'S 104°95'E), Lebak Tanjung Aur
(03°19'S 104°92'E), Resort Air Muara Padang
(02°09'S 105°101'E), Napalicin (02°42'S 102°21'E),
Dempo mountain (04°00'S 103°07'E).
Cotton Pygmy-goose Nettapus coromandelianus
While carrying out fieldwork at Ogan Komering
Lebak, I observed Cotton Pygmy-goose on a number
of occasions. On 8 June 2000 at 09h40, I saw two
flocks of ten and five birds at Lebak Kuro Pampangan,
and local people reported that they had previously
caught three young birds of this species (which they
knew as bebek alas ) in a tree nest-hole. On 24 March
2001, I saw at least six birds at Lebak Deling
Pampangan, including a male flying at a distance of
10-12 m. On 29 August 2001, 1 saw two separate pairs
at Lebak Teluk Toman Pedamaran. On 5 February
2002, I saw a flock of four birds at Lebak Sungai
Bungin Pampangan, and a local guide showed me a
tree-hole said to be used by the species for nesting. On
16 April 2002, several flocks totaling c.50 birds were
observed at Lebak Deling Pampangan. A young bird
killed by local people was greyish above, creamy below,
with dark legs, a dark eye-stripe, a long whitish super-
cilium from the forehead to the nape and whitish
cheeks. Finally, on 27 March 2003, I saw a pair at
Lebak Tanjung Aur.
This species is resident in South and South-East
Asia. Its status in Sumatra is uncertain (MacKinnon et
al. 1998), although it is apparently resident (Holmes
and Nash 1999), being recorded commonly in small
numbers, e.g. at North Lampung (Holmes and Noor
1995), Ogan Komering Lebak (Verheugt et al. 1993),
Air Hitam Dalam (Holmes 1996) and Way Kambas
(Parrot and Andrew 1996). These observations
confirm that Cotton Pygmy-goose breeds in Sumatra.
Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula
On 29 August 2001, two birds were seen at Lebak
Teluk Toman, Ogan Komering Lebak. The birds were
seen flying low over the water at distance of 20-50 m,
landing in the water, and then diving, and were
observed through 7x50 binoculars for five minutes.
One bird was black with contrasting white belly and
flanks; the second was brown with a white belly; both
had dark upperwings with a broad white wing-bar, and
they gave a noisy call ker-r-rrr, ker-r-rr.
This species breeds widely in the northern
Palearctic, wintering from Africa to the Indian subcon¬
tinent, southern China, Japan and the Philippines. It is
scarce to uncommon in Myanmar and Thailand, and a
vagrant to Peninsular Malaysia (Sonobe and Usui
1993, Robson 2000). Although noted as occurring in
Sumatra by MacKinnon et al. (1998), this species was
not listed for Sumatra by Andrew (1992, 1993) or
Kukila (2000).
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes
On 30 December 1999 at 06h30, I observed a single
conspicuous slim wader on the bank of the Rawas river
in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Rawas Ulu district,
South Sumatra province. Good views were obtained at
a distance of 7-10 m.The bird had a pale greyish head,
neck, mantle, back and wings, white underparts with
faint streaking on the breast, a dark slim bill and long
yellow legs. The bird was taller than a nearby Common
Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos, which it behaved aggres¬
sively towards, giving a twi-twi-twi call. In flight, the
square white rump was seen clearly. The bird was
identified as a juvenile or non-breeding Lesser
Yellowlegs using Marchant et al. (1986). It was distin¬
guished from Grey-tailed Tattler Heteroscelus brevipes,
Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis , Terek Sandpiper
Xenus cinereus and Nordmann’s Greenshank T. guttifer
168
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
by the combination of long yellow legs, square white
rump, and slim straight bill. Wood Sandpiper T. glareola
was eliminated by its shorter legs and stronger supercil-
ium, especially behind the eye). Greater Yellowlegs T.
melanoleuca was eliminated by its larger size and longer,
thicker bill (Marchant et al. 1986).
Lesser Yellowlegs breeds in North America and
winters largely in Central and South America. It is a
rare visitor to East Asia (Sonobe and Usui 1993). This
is the second record for Sumatra and Indonesia, follow¬
ing one in North Sumatra (Ollington and Parish 1989,
Andrew 1992, Kukila 2000).
Pied Harrier Circus melanoleucos
On 29 November 1999 at 13h30, I saw a male Pied
Harrier flying over a swampy floodplain at Ogan
Komering Lebak, Pemulutan district, South Sumatra
province. The bird seen flying slowly 5 m above the
ground, and good views were obtained down to
10-15 m for several minutes. The bird was a large pale
grey raptor, with a black head, throat, and back. The
upperwing and underwing was pale grey with black
outer primaries; there was a white lesser-covert patch
on the leading edge of the wing, and the underparts
were pale grey or white.
This was the first record of Pied Harrier in
Sumatra (Andrew 1992, 1993, Holmes 1996, Kukila
2000), although an undocumented record is included
in the bird list for Kerinci Seblat National Park revised
byj. Holden in Anon. (2002). The species breeds in the
east Palearctic, north-east China and north Korea,
wintering in the Indian subcontinent, southern China,
Borneo and the Philippines. It has been recorded as a
vagrant in Singapore (Robson 2000, Ferguson-Lees
and Christie 2001).
Ferruginous Flycatcher Muscicapa ferruginea
On 25 February 2000 at 07h30, I observed a
Ferruginous Flycatcher on the edge of secondary forest
between 700 m and 1,000 m on Dempo mountain
(4"00'S 103’07'E), Pagar Alam regency, South
Sumatra province. The bird was watched at a distance
of 5 m for about two minutes in fairly poor light condi¬
tions. The bird was perched on low branches up to 1 m
above the ground. It was a small flycatcher with a grey
head, chestnut upperparts, darker wings and tail,
rufous fringes to the greater coverts and tertials,
brighter rufous tail, rump and uppertail-coverts
compared to the back, white throat and belly, rufous
breast and flanks, dark eye with a white eye-ring, and
dark bill and legs.
Ferruginous Flycatcher breeds in Nepal, north¬
east Indian subcontinent, China and Taiwan, and
winters in the Philippines and at 500-1,500 m in
northern Sumatra and Kalimantan (MacKinnon et al.
1998, Robson 2000). Marie and Voous (1988) noted
that is probably overlooked, and Holmes (1996) did
not list it for Sumatra (although Andrew 1992 did).
UNCONFIRMED RECORD
Silvery Pigeon Columba argentina
On 27 November 1999 at 09h30, while travelling by
pompong (a large motorised boat) along the Muara
Padang river at Resort Air Muara, Padang-Sugihan
Wildlife Reserve, I saw three white imperial pigeons
perched in a palm tree at a height of c.20 m. Good
views were obtained at a distance 20-40 m and a height
of c.10 m from the upper deck of the boat. One bird
appeared paler than the other two and significantly
smaller when all three flew off. All three birds were
white, with a black tail and flight feathers. I tentatively
identified the smaller bird as Silvery Pigeon, and the
larger ones as Pied Imperial Pigeon Ducula bicolor. The
two species are very difficult to distinguish (Gibbs et al.
2001: Silvery is smaller (but overlaps in overall length),
generally more creamy-white than silvery bluish-grey,
has a broad straight-cut tail-band rather than a triangu¬
lar or wedge-shaped apical tail-band, extensive reddish
orbital skin (rather than less extensive and blue-grey),
pale greenish bill with a purplish-red base (rather than
uniform blue-grey). Unfortunately I was not able to see
any of the diagnostic features and confirm the identifi¬
cation.
This Critically Endangered species has a
dispersed yet highly constricted range on the islands off
the west and east coasts of Sumatra, extending onto the
Malaysian islands west of Borneo (BirdLife
International 2001). There have been no confirmed
records for 70 years, although there were unconfirmed
records in Padang-Sugihan Wildlife Reserve in
November 1984 and June 1985 (Nash and Nash
1985), and unconfirmed records of ‘large numbers’
along the Sembilang River in March 1989 (Verheugt et
al. 1993). Further searches at Padang-Sugihan Wildlife
Reserve are therefore urgently needed to clarify the
status of this species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank BirdLife Indonesia for giving me an opportunity to carry out
bird observations on Dempo Mountain and supporting fieldwork in
Ogan Komering Lebak, in particular I thank Ria Saryanthi, Hidayat,
William Rombang, Yusuf Cahyadin, Dian Agista, Irma Susilawati and
Arif Budiman. Thanks are also to Kak Cek Sul, Ridwan, Guluk, Indra
and Basith for their kind cooperation during my work on Ogan
Komering Lebak. Survey work in Kerinci Seblat National Park was
funded by PHPA-World Bank-Yayasan KEHATI Indonesia. I thank
Ahmad Zulfikar, Horison, Kurniawan, Suryadi, Kak Syahrial, Pak
Damiri and Bapak Muhammad Nur for their help and companionship
in the field, and Dr Ani Mardiastuti for support. I thank FMIPA Bio
UNSRI and BKSDASS, especially Dr Agus Purwoko for the opportu¬
nity to visit Resort Air Muara Padang. Thanks also to Dr Christian
Goener and Ferry Hasudungan (Wetland International Asia Pacific
Indonesia Programme) for their support. Finally, I would like to thank
my partners in KPB-SOS (Kelompok Pengamat Burung Spirit of
South Sumatra): Rina Sari Suryana, Ali Imron and FadlyTakari.
REFERENCES
Andrew, P. (1992) The birds of Indonesia: a checklist (Peters’ sequence).
Jakarta: Indonesian Ornithological Society.
Andrew, P. (1993) The birds of Indonesia. Kukila checklist no. 1:
additions, corrections and notes 1. Kukila 6: 47-52.
Anon. (2002) Management framework for Kerinci Seblat National Park
2002-2006. Jambi, Indonesia: Kerinci .Seblat Integrated
Conservation and Development Project.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
169
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world. New
York: Houghton Mifflin.
Holmes, D. A. (1996) Sumatra bird report. Kukila 8: 9-56.
Holmes, D. and S. Nash. (1999) Burung-burung di Sumatra dan
kalimantan. Jakarta: LIPI and BirdLife International Indonesia
Programme [In Indonesian],
Holmes, D. A. and Noor, Y. R. (1995) Discovery of waterbird
colonies in north Lampung, Sumatra. Kukila 7: 121-128.
Kukila (2000) The birds of Indonesia. Kukila checklist no. 1:
additions, corrections and notes 2. Kukila 11: 3-12.
MacKinnon, J., Phillipps, K. and van Balen, B. (1998) Burung-
burung di Sumatra, Jawa, Bali dan Kalimantan. Jakarta:
Puslitbang Biologi LIPI and BirdLife International Indonesia
Programme.
Marchant, J., Prater, T. and Hayman, P. (1986) Shorebirds: an identi¬
fication guide to the waders of the world. London: Christopher
Helm.
van Marie, J. G. and Voous, K. H (1988) The birds of Sumatra: an
annotated check-list. Tring, U.K.: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list 10).
Nash, S.V. and Nash, A. D. (1985) A checklist of the forest and forest
edge birds of the Padang-Sugihan Wildlife Reserve, South
Sumatra. Kukila 2: 51-59.
Ollington, R. F. and Parish, D. (1989) Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa
flavipes in Sumatra: new to S.E. Asia. Kukila 4: 1-2.
Parrot, S. and Andrew, P. (1996) An annotated checklist of the birds
ofWay Kambas National Park, Sumatra. Kukila 8: 57-85.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia.
London: New Holland.
Sonobe, K. and Usui, S. (1993) A field guide to the waterbirds of Asia.
Tokyo: Wild Bird Society of Japan.
Verheugt, W. J. M., Skov, H., Danielsen, F., Suwarman, U.,
Kadarisman, R. and Purwoko, A. (1993) Notes on the birds of
the tidal lowlands and floodplains of South Sumatra province,
Indonesia. Kukila 6: 53-84.
Muhammad Iqbal, KPB-SOS (Kelompok Pengamat Burung Spirit of South Sumatra) , Jl. Tanjung api-api km 9,
Komplek P and K Blok E 1, Palembang 30152, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia. Email: kpbsos26@yahoo.com
Nesting of Jerdon’s Baza Aviceda jerdoni and
Black Baza A. leuphotes in Buxa Tiger Reserve,
West Bengal, India
S. SIVAKUMAR and VIBHU PRAKASH
Jerdon’s Baza Aviceda jerdoni and Black Baza A.
leuphotes have similar distributions in south, east and
north-east India to South-East Asia and China
(Grimmett et al. 1998, Ferguson-Lees and Christie
2001). Their breeding biology is relatively poorly
known, although some information has been published
e.g. Baker (1935), Grossman et al. (1965), Ali and
Ripley (1987), Ferguson-Lees and Christie (2001).
We studied the nesting biology of both species in
Buxa Tiger Reserve, Jalpaiguri district, West Bengal,
India during 1999-2000. The reserve is located at
26°30-55'N 89°20-55'E and covers an area of
760 km2, with a core area of 385 km2 and a buffer zone
375 km2. It borders Bhutan to the north, and Assam to
the east. The elevation ranges from 60 m to 1,750 m.
Most of the reserve lies in the plains; the northern
tracts are hilly. The main habitat is moist tropical forest
dominated by sal Shorea robusta. There are also planta¬
tions of sal, teak Tectona grandis , jarul Lagerstroemia
reginae , and mixed plantations of native trees. The
temperature range is 12-32°C and the average annual
rainfall is c.4,100 mm.
METHODS
Nests of bazas were found by searching during the
early part of the breeding season in the Dhamanpur,
Rajabhathkawa, Buxaduar and Jainty Ranges of the
reserve, following birds in aerial display or with nest
materials. At the Jerdon’s Baza nest, observations were
made from the ground using a 20-60x telescope
during first week of nestling period. A small (1.5x1 m)
platform was constructed 30 m up a tree c.30m from
the nest, and this was used for observations for the rest
of the nestling period. We usually attempted to enter
the hide before sunrise and leave after sunset to avoid
disturbance to the breeding birds. Casual observations
were carried out at Black Baza nests. In addition, focal
observations were carried out for 680 minutes at nest 2
during the incubation period (six, ten and fourteen
days after laying), 360 minutes when the chicks were
five days old at nest 2, and 315 minutes when the
chicks were 21 days old at nest 3. Observations were
made from ground by using a 20-60x telescope and
8x40 binoculars from a sufficient distance to avoid
disturbing the birds.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Jerdon’s Baza
One nest was found on 20 May 2000 at a height of
30 m in a 35 m tall sal tree (160 cm girth at breast
height). The nest tree was in the middle of a small
(150x50 m) sal plantation at 26°33'53"N 89°32'07"E
and was one of the largest trees in the plantation. The
nest was found during incubation, but the eggs were
not checked to avoid disturbance.
Three nestlings hatched on 1 June. During 121
hours of observations through the nestling period, 1 16
prey items were delivered: 62 insects (mainly larvae),
13 frogs, 25 reptiles (23 common garden lizards Calotes
170
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Table 1. Details of Black Baza Aviceda leuphotes nests found in Buxa Tiger Reserve during 1999 (nest 1) and 2000 (nests 2-6).
Amoora wallichi (5)
versicolor and two common cat snakes Boiga trigonata )
and 16 unidentified small items. The insect larvae may
have been Phalera raya, as we observed the adults
feeding on this species. These observations fit previ¬
ously published accounts of the species diet (Ali and
Ripley 1987, del Hoyo et al. 1994, Grimmett et al.
1998), although adults are also known to feed on birds’
eggs (Grossman et al. 1965). Both adults fed the
nestlings, tearing prey into pieces for the first week,
after which chicks swallowed prey items whole.
Considerably fewer prey items were brought after the
chick was four weeks old, presumably to encourage
fledging (Brown 1955).
Nestlings spent less time sleeping or resting as they
got older: 56% of time at 12 days old, 17.5% at 16
days and 3.2% at 20 days. They were brooded during
the day only during the first week, and also for 59
minutes during a heavy rain at 23 days. The chicks
became alert when Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis
cheela, Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides and
Large Cuckoo Shrike Coracina macei were heard, and
they crouched down when Crested Serpent Eagles
soared overhead. The adults also chased Large-billed
Crows Corvus macrorhynchos when they were in the
vicinity of nest site.
Two nestlings were found dead in the nest 24 days
after hatching. There were no signs of injury, so they
may have died as a result of heavy rain and reduced
food supply that occurred when they were 21-22 days
old, rather than from direct attacks by the third chick
(which is common in raptors: e.g. Reese 1972,
Meyberg 1974, Newton 1986). There was no attempt
to eat or remove the carcasses by the adults or the other
nestling during five hours of observations, so we
removed them. The surviving nestling was first seen to
flap its wings at 27 days old, and more vigorously with
jumping from 29 days. It left the nest at 42 days old,
and was seen within 150 m of the nest tree for a further
five days.
Black Baza
Six nests were found (Table 1). Nest 2 (found in
2000) was c. 30m from nest 1 (found in 1999) and
presumably shows approximate nest site fidelity within
the same pair. The composition of three nests was
checked after the breeding season: all were composed
almost entirely of Lagerstroemia reginae sticks, with a
few sal sticks. Both sexes participated in nest-building,
incubation, brooding and feeding the chicks. Nest
building commenced during April and laying began,
or was estimated to have begun, during May. Nest 3
was commenced late in the breeding season, when
other pairs were feeding nestlings. The nest tree was
the only tall tree in that area, which made the nest
more conspicuous. Large-billed Crows Corvus
macrorhynchos were observed disturbing the breeding
pair frequently and the nest was deserted apparently
before laying commenced. The pair may have been
inexperienced or the nest may have been a second
attempt that season.
The incubation period at two nests was 26-27 days.
Out of 680 minutes of observation made during
incubation, the female incubated for 248 minutes, and
the male for 232 minutes. During 360 minutes obser¬
vations at nest 2 when the chicks were five days old, the
female brooded them 40% of the time, the male
brooded 19% of the time, they were fed for 1%, and
left unattended for 40%. No brooding was observed
during 315 minutes observation at nest 3 when the
chicks were 21 days old. The mean interval between
delivery of prey items was 25 minutes when the chicks
were five days old, and 17 minutes when they were 21
days old. In total, 28 prey items were seen being
brought to nests 2 and 3: 13 unidentified green insect
larvae (resembling Phalera raya) and 15 unidentified
small items. The preponderance of insect prey is
notable: previously published accounts of the species’s
diet mention lizards, frogs, and occasionally bats, small
ground mammals and small birds in addition to insects
(Ali and Ripley 1987, Ferguson-Lees and Christie
2001). However, during our observations almost 50%
of the prey items delivered to the chicks consisted of
insect larvae.
At 21 days old the chicks were frequently seen
preening, hopping to nearby branches and flapping
their wings. Only one nest fledged any chicks, and
only two out of six chicks in total survived to
fledging.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
171
CONSERVATION
At Buxa Tiger Reserve, Jerdon’s and Black Bazas are
not directly targeted for hunting or persecution. Both
species are listed on Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife
(Protection) Act 1972.
A wide range of pesticides are used in the tea
gardens surrounding the reserve where bazas feed, and
this may have detrimental consequences for them.
Monitoring pesticide use and residues in birds would
be desirable. Illegal woodcutting was noted throughout
the reserve. Selective removal of mature tall trees may
reduce the availability of nest sites for bazas.
Prevention of such activities is needed immediately.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for providing funds
through the Ministry of Environment and Forest, and the Forest
Department, West Bengal, for permitting us to carry out the study
and extending necessary facilities. In BNHS, we are indebted to
Ashfaq Ahmed Zarri for his invaluable comments and suggestions on
the first draft of the manuscript and Dr Ranjit Manakdan for provid¬
ing computer facilities and encouragement. We thank Gautam
Chaterjee for providing the rainfall data, Elbert Sangma, Raja Sen
and Dilip Roy for dedicated assistance in the field during the study.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Baker, E. C. S. (1935) The nidification of the birds of the Indian Empire.
London: Taylor and Francis.
Brown, L. H. (1955) Supplementary notes on the biology of the
large birds of prey of Enbu District, Kenya Colony. Ibis 97:
38-64, 183-221.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: A. & C. Black.
Grossman, M. L., Grossman, S. and Hamlet, J. (1965) Birds of prey
of the world. London: Cassell & Co.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press,
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J., eds. (1994) Handbook of the
birds of the world. V ol. 2. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Meyberg, B.-U. (1974) Sibling aggression and mortality among
nestling eagles. Ibis 1 16: 224-228.
Newton, I. (1986) The Sparrowhaiuk. Calton, U.K.: T and A. D.
Poyser.
Reese, J. G. (1972) A Chesapeake Barn Owl population. Auk 89:
106-114.
A. Sivakumar and Vibhu Prakash, Bombay Natural History Society, Hornbill House, S. B. Singh Road, Mumbai 400
023, India. Email: sivaprema3sep@yahoo.com
Franklin’s Gull Larus pipixcan at Tanggu, Tianjin:
first record for China
PAUL HOLT
In recent years, a large coastal reclamation project
south of the mouth of the Hai river, Tanggu, Tianjin,
China, has provided excellent opportunities to study a
variety of shorebirds and gulls at close quarters. In
September and early October 2004, 1 spent about three
weeks birding this area. On 18 September at 09h30, I
found an adult winter-plumaged Franklin’s Gull Larus
pipixcan with a handful of other gulls at the high tide
roost (38°58'N 117°44'E). The bird was watched for
about five minutes at c.120 m range in good light with
the sun at almost 90° to my left, using a 30x eyepiece
on a tripod-mounted telescope. Unfortunately I did
not see the bird leave: it presumably took flight while I
was changing the lens on my telescope, but several
digital photographs (Plate 1) and some brief field notes
were taken. These field notes were later supplemented
by additional notes based on study of my photos.
DESCRIPTION
The bird was very distinctive, and I was able to rapidly
and confidently identify it based on previous experi¬
ence with the species. Clearly a small gull, it was
noticeably smaller and more compact than an adjacent
Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus. At rest it also
appeared to have relatively longer legs, plumper body,
rounder head, and it was both shorter- and deeper-
billed than that species. Its stance was more horizontal,
the wings were not drooped and this probably
contributed to its compact, portly jizz. Structurally it
resembled (but was larger than) Little Gull L. minutus
(one of which was present on the same tank later that
day), while its plumage was radically different to any
Asian gull and most closely resembled that of die
extralimital Laughing Gull L. atricilla — a species with
which I was also familiar.
The bird’s dark grey mantle was immediately eye¬
catching, and was similar in shade to that of mature
west European Lesser Black-backed Gull L. fuscus
graellsii, Heuglin’s Gull L. heuglini taimyrensis (neither
of which was present for direct comparison) or a
mature Black-tailed Gull L. crassirostris, many of which
were present on the impound not very far from the
Franklin’s Gull. The bird’s prominent white tertial-
and, to a lesser degree, scapular-crescents contrasted
well with the dark upperparts. It also had the distinc¬
tive partially hooded head-pattern typical of a
172
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
winter-plumaged Franklin’s Gull. The dramatic head
pattern comprised a small dark pre-ocular spot, exten¬
sively and almost solidly blackish ear-coverts and a less
uniform area of dense streaking that extended broadly
up and over the rear of its head and crown. The
forehead and fore-crown were white and unmarked,
while the area from the centre of the crown to the back
of the hood was prominently streaked with black
(particularly to the rear). This head pattern, coupled
with two bold eye-crescents, the latter bulging slightly
and almost merging to the rear of the eye, as well as a
broad and clean white hind-collar, all contributed to
give the bird a very distinctive appearance.
The bird also had conspicuous broad white tips to
at least its four outermost primaries, which were clearly
visible on the folded wing (especially the outermost
three: at rest the white tip to P7 often appearing to
merge with the white tertial crescent). On two
occasions the gull slowly stretched one of its wings,
displaying the species’s diagnostic adult wing-tip
pattern. It had conspicuous black subterminal marks
on the four outermost primaries (and possibly a small
black subterminal mark on the fifth outermost
primary). The outermost primary did not have the
small white mirror shown by many adult Franklin’s
Gulls, but it did have the largest amount of black, diis
black decreasing inwards and basally. There was an
extensive white area, effectively a continuation of the
white trailing edge to the secondaries and inner primar¬
ies, distal to, and on the inside edge up of the black
subterminal marks on all of these outer primaries.
Taken together these feature produced a particularly
attractive upperwing pattern, one that was reminiscent
of the much larger Pallas’s Gull L. ichthyaetus.
The bill was rather short, deep and relatively blunt-
tipped. Lacking the lengthy drooping shape normally
readily apparent on Laughing Gull, it appeared dark as
did the relatively long legs. The bill, and less noticeably
the legs, had a barely perceptible dark claret-red hue.
RANGE AND STATUS
Franklin’s Gull breeds locally throughout the interior
provinces of temperate western Canada, east to the
Great Lakes and south to mid-west U.S.A.; it winters
primarily along the Pacific coast of South America,
from Guatemala to Chile (Rogers 2003). The species is
an increasingly regular, almost annual, vagrant to
western Europe and there have now been over 74
records in that region: 41 in Britain up to the end of
2002 (Rogers 2003) and 33 elsewhere up to the end of
1994 (Mitchell and Young 1997). Cottridge and
Vinicombe (1996) convincingly argued that the occur¬
rence pattern in Britain suggests that most vagrants are
birds that first crossed to the Old World in the southern
hemisphere and then migrated north after wintering in
Africa. Since there have been 12 accepted records in
Australia up to August 2004 (Palliser 2004) and there
are still apparently only three other records in the
whole of the Oriental region (all from Japan: Brazil
1991), a similar pattern may well occur in Asia. Birds
may initially cross the southern Pacific before migrat¬
ing north up the coast of the Asian landmass.
Plate 1. Franklin’s Gull Larus pipixcan at Tanggu, Tianjin,
China in September 2004, with Black-headed Gull L.
ridibundus to the left and Relict Gull L. relictus to the right.
During the time I spent at Tanggu, I noted over 170
species, including 41 shorebird species. These included
four globally threatened species (BirdLife International
2004): Swan Goose Anser cygnoides (Endangered; one
south on 20 September), Spoon-billed Sandpiper
Calidris pygmeus (Endangered; a winter plumaged adult
on 7 September and a first-winter on 5 October),
Saunders’s Gull Larus saundersi (Vulnerable; a single
first-winter, possibly the same individual, on 4 and 24
September, and two adult winter-plumaged birds on 7
October) and up to 1,582 Relict Gulls L. relictus
(Vulnerable). The site lies very close to Dagu where
some of the first Relict Gull specimens were collected
in October 1934 and April 1935, and Tanggu ’s impor¬
tance for the species has been recently documented by
Zhang et al. (1999), Robson (2002,2004) and Liu etal.
(2003). In addition I recorded two Near Threatened
species: Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus semipalmatus
(up to 40 on 3 September) and Eastern Curlew
Numenius madagascariensis. Particularly large daily
totals of shorebirds included 5,200 Marsh Sandpiper
Triuga stagnatilis (18 September), 4,500 Red-necked
Stint Calidris ruficollis (7 September), 453 Temminck’s
Stint C. temminckii (18 September) and 7,000 Kentish
Plover Charadrius alexandrinus (18 September). I also
recorded a few local rarities at this same site: Little
Stint Calidris minuta (a moulting summer-plumaged
adult on 23-24 September), Red-necked Phalarope
Phalaropus lobatus (a juvenile on 7 September) and
Little Gull (single winter-plumaged adults on 18
September and 7 October).
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Brazil, M. A. (1991) The birds of Japan. London: Christopher Helm.
Cottridge, D. and Vinicombe, K. (1996). Rare birds in Britain and
Ireland: a photographic record. London: Harper Collins.
Cramp, S. ed. (1983) The birds of the western Pale arctic. Vo\. 3. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Liu,Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y. and Su H. (2003) Record congregation
of Relict Gull Larus relictus during the migration season. Oriental
Bird Club Bull. 38: 41-42.
Mitchell, D. and Young, S. (1997) Rare birds of Britain and Europe.
London: New Holland.
Palliser, T. and the Birds Australia Rarities Committee (BARC)
Submission No 411: Franklin’s Gull Larus pipixcan, Anglesea, VTC.
19th January 2004. Available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/
palliser/barc/sub4 1 1 .htm
Robson, C. (2002) From the field. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 36: 61-71 .
Robson, C. (2004) From the field. BirdingASIA 1: 78-87.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
173
Rogers, M. J. and the Rarities Committee (2003) Report on rare Zhang S., Ni X., Sun Q., Xu J., Bi Z., Pan C., Liang W., Dai Q. and
birds in Great Britain in 2002. Brit. Birds 96: 542-609. Zhang G. (1999) A study on the diversity and conservation of
the avifauna of wetlands in Tianjin, China. Unpublished report.
Paul I. Holt, New Laund Farm, Greenhead Lane, Fence, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 9 DU, U.K. Email:
piholt@hotmail.com
The song of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios in
North Sulawesi, Indonesia
BEN KING
Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios was described by
Rasmussen (1999) from a specimen mist-netted by F.
G. and C. Rozendaal on the night of 5-6 April 1985 at
1,120 m near Clark’s camp (Hill 1,440) in the east-
central part of Bogani Nani Wartabone National Park,
North Sulawesi, Indonesia (c.0"40'N 123°0'E).
Subsequently, a second bird was mist-netted by Lee
and Riley (2001) at 19h00 on 14 November 1999 in
primary forest at 1,420 m in the Gunong Ambang
Nature Reserve in North Sulawesi, about 30 km east of
the type locality. The second individual was measured,
photographed and released, but no further observa¬
tions of the species were made. Mauro (2000) recorded
one at 1,700 m in Lore Lindu National Park in central
Sulawesi on 18 December 1998.
With Jon Riley’s help, I visited the site in Gunong
Ambang Nature Reserve on 13 and 15 September
2000 with the hope of tape-recording the owl. The
species appeared to be common and I tape-recorded
one of ten individuals heard on 15 September. Tape
playback attracted one individual to within 5 m, where
it called repeatedly and allowed excellent views at eye-
level through lOx binoculars. The owl was entirely
bright rufous with yellow eyes, no distinct facial
pattern, and no ear-tufts. It appeared smaller than
Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl N. ochracea, which has much
darker and browner plumage, with a contrastingly
paler ochraceous belly.
The song was a hard wruck-wruck, the two notes of
the couplet being c.0.5 seconds apart (Fig. 1). The
individual notes sounded very much like (and were
initially mistaken for) the alarm call notes of Large¬
tailed Nightjar Caprimulgus macrurus (and other
species in this complex), and harder than the territorial
calls of species in that complex. In contrast, the song of
Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl is a mellow hollow couplet,
whoo-whoooo, with c.0.15 seconds between the notes,
with the second note being longer and with a rasping
quality (see Fig. 1). These vocal differences lend
further support to the separation of Cinnabar Hawk
Owl from Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl.
Both Rasmussen (1999) and Lee and Riley (2001)
expressed some concern that Cinnabar Hawk Owl
might be rare. My estimate of ten individuals heard in
one night suggests that at this site at least it appears not
to be rare. Further, the habitat was a mosaic of primary
forest, cleared areas and cultivation, suggesting that the
- ! - 1 - j - 1 - 1 - j - j - ] - j -
0 0.5 1.0
seconds
Figure 1. Sonagrams of songs of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox
ios (recorded on 15 September 2000 in Gunong Ambang
Nature Reserve, Sulawesi, Indonesia) and Ochre-bellied
Hawk Owl N. ochracea (recorded in August 1985 in Dumoga-
Bone National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia). The song of
Cinnabar Hawk Owl is a hard couplet, wruck-wruck, while
that of Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl is a mellow, hollow couplet
whoo-whoooo, the second note with a raspy quality.
species may be able to tolerate degraded habitat to
some degree. This would improve the prognosis for its
survival.
I believe that ‘hawk owl’ is a misnomer for the owls
of the genus Ninox. With their forward-looking eyes,
large rounded heads and short tails, they are obviously
owls and bear no resemblance whatever to hawks. I
prefer the Australian appellation ‘boobook’ for the
smaller members of the genus. Further, I suggest that
‘rufous’ is preferable to ‘cinnabar’ as the entire bird is
a rich rufous colour, while cinnabar is the mineral from
which the pigment vermilion was originally made,
which is a different colour to that of the plumage of
Ninox ios.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Jon Riley was very helpful in sharing his knowledge of the site. Jeff
Groth prepared the sonagrams. I wish to thank John Fitzpatrick and
Greg Budney of the Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds at the
Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology for the use of tape-recording
equipment.
174
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
REFERENCES
Lee, R. J. and Riley, J. (2001) Morphology, plumage, and habitat of
the newly described Cinnabar Hawk-Owl from North Sulawesi,
Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 113(1): 17-22.
Mauro, I. (2001) Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios at Lore Lindu
National Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, in December 1998.
Forktail 17: 1 18-1 19.
Rasmussen, P. C. (1999) A new species of hawk-owl Ninox from
North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 111(4): 457-464.
Ben King, Ornithology Dept. , American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York,
NY 10024, U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthlink.net
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis habitat use and
association with cattle
K. SEEDIKKOYA, P. A. AZEEZ and E. A. A. SHUKKUR
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis has a worldwide distribution.
In India it is common in a variety of habitats, especially
wetlands, throughout the peninsula. Freshwater
marshes and paddy fields were identified as the most
important foraging habitats by Meyerricks (1962) and
Seedikkoya (2004), although there are pronounced
seasonal variations in the usage of these habitats. Cattle
Egrets are often found associated with cattle and
occasionally with pigs, goats, and horses, and also with
moving vehicles such as tractors. The birds appear to
exploit their ‘beating effect’ whereby insects and other
prey are disturbed by the larger animal (or vehicle) and
hence are easier to detect and/or capture.
METHODS
We studied habitat use, association with cattle, and
foraging behaviour of Cattle Egrets in Malappuram
and Kozhikode districts, Kerala, India, as part of a
larger study on the ecology and biology of wetland
birds during 2000-2001. Although seven habitats were
studied (Table 1), hillock and riverine were excluded
from the analysis of habitat use as very few birds were
recorded in them.
In each habitat we walked along a fixed route every
week, counting all egrets within a 100x100 m area. We
made five counts per day from 06h00 to 18h00. Egrets
were defined as associated with cattle if they were
found <1 m from an animal and were alert to its
movements. We carried out focal observations on
randomly selected foraging egrets, during which we
recorded number of strikes, successful captures
(identified by the characteristic head-jerk swallowing
behaviour: Heatwole 1965, Dinsmore 1973, Grubb
1976, Scott 1984) and number of steps in a two-
minute period. Assuming that the size and quality of
food gathered by egrets associated with cattle or alone
is the same, we used the number of steps taken for each
successful capture to assess the energy expenditure per
capture of foraging egrets. Means are shown with ±1
standard deviation. One-way ANOVAs were used to
test the significance of differences between capture
rates, strike rates and steps per capture for foraging
egrets associated with cattle or alone.
RESULTS
In the study area Cattle Egrets mixed with
Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia , Little Egret
Egretta garzetta and Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii
in groups of hundreds of individuals, roosting at night
in large rubber plantations. They left roosts at
Table 1. Salient features of habitat types.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
175
□ Other
□ Plantation
□ Jheel
0 Grass
■ Paddyfield
Figure 1 . Percentage of observations of Cattle Egrets in each
habitat each month.
Figure 2. Percentage of Cattle Egrets associated with cattle
in each habitat each month.
c.06h00-06hl5 in small groups to disperse to different
areas. In the evening, small groups returning from
foraging areas often congregated in Hocks of hundreds
of individuals on riverbanks and paddyfields near to
roosts, to which they returned at c. 18h00-18hl5.
Seasonal pattern of abundance and habitat use
Cattle Egrets show local migration patterns during the
breeding season, which coincides with the monsoon in
June to September. During this period they were
absent from the study area, apparently moving north¬
wards from Kerala to breed. Cattle Egrets showed
marked seasonal variation in the habitats they used
(Fig. 1). Grass fields followed by jheels (shallow water
bodies) were the most frequently used habitats
throughout the season. Paddyfields were used heavily
in October, but declined in importance through the
season as they became drier, with very few birds seen
in this habitat by May. Plantations were used least
frequently, and not at all after January (Fig. 1).
Association with cattle
Of 1,082 birds on which focal observations were made,
653 (59.6%) associated with cattle. The percentage of
birds associated with cattle was highest in plantations
(100%), followed by jheel (73.2%), grass (62.9%), and
paddyfield (36.0%), with 0% in the waste dump. This
pattern largely reflects the distribution of cattle. As we
did not quantify this distribution, we were unable to
test whether egrets associated with cattle preferentially
in particular habitats. The percentage of egrets associ¬
ated with cattle showed little seasonal variation in
grass, but declined through the season in jheel and
paddyfields (Fig. 2). Cattle egrets showed highest
frequency of association with cattle from 09h00 to
12h00 and 14h00 to 16h00, with low association early
in the morning, late in the evening and during the
middle of the day. This reflects the peaks in grazing by
cattle, which rest in the shade during the hottest part
of the day.
When egrets associated with cattle, they usually fed
near the front legs of the animals. Egrets associated with
cattle caught prey items at a significantly higher rate
(1.310.86 vs. 0.910.75 items per minute; F, J68=13.6,
P<0.001). They probably used less energy to achieve
this higher foraging rate, as they took fewer steps
between successful captures (19.812.1 steps per
capture vs. 29.112.5; F, 168=754, F<0. 001). They also
had a higher rate of capture attempts (strikes): 4.811 .8
vs. 3.611.3 strikes per minute; FM68= 27.6, P<0.001).
There was no significant difference in the strike success
between associated and unassociated birds: the mean
strike success was 27.2% and 27.6% respectively.
DISCUSSION
Cattle egrets that associated with cattle in the study
area caught prey items at a faster rate and apparently
expended less energy to achieve this, as has been noted
in other studies on this species (Heatwole 1965, Grubb
1976). This association appears to be an example of
facultative commensalism (Rand 1954, Heatwole
1965). Egrets were not seen to prey upon cattle
ectoparasites, as has been noted elsewhere (Heatwole
1965, Seedikkoya 2004). Association with other egrets
foraging near cattle also may result in group benefits
such as improved vigilance or reduced probability of
attack by predators (Brown 1964, Hamilton 1971, Vine
1973, Powell 1974, Barnard 1980, Bertram 1980,
Caraco et al. 1980, Elgar and Catterall 1981).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to SACON, Farook College and Mampad MES
College for facilities, and P. R. Arun for valuable critical comments
on the previous drafts of the paper.
REFERENCES
Barnard, C. J. (1980) Flock feeding and time budgets in the house
sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Anim. Behav. 28: 295-309.
Bertram, B. C. R. (1980) Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Anim.
Behav. 28: 278-286.
Brown, J. L. (1964) The evolution of diversity in avian social systems.
Wilson Bull. 76: 160-169.
Caraco, T., Martindale, S. and Pulliam, R. H. (1980) Avian flocking
in the presence of a predator. Nature 285: 400-401.
Dinsmore, J. J. (1973) Foraging success in cattle egret, Bubulcus ibis.
Am. Midi. Nat. 89: 242-246.
Elgar, M. A. and Catterall, C. P. (1981) Flocking and predation
surveillance in house sparrows: test of an hypothesis. Anim.
Behav. 29: 868-872.
Grubb, T. C. (1976) Adaptiveness of foraging in the Cattle Egret.
Wilson Bull. 88: 145-148.
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol.
31: 295-311.
Heatwole, H. (1965) Some aspects of the association of Cattle Egrets
with cattle. Anim. Behav. 13: 79-83.
Meyerricks, A. J. (1962) Diversity typifies heron feeding. Nat. Hist.
71: 48-59.
Powell, G. V. N. (1974) Experimental analysis of the social value of
flocking by starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) in relation to predation
and foraging. Anim. Behav. 22: 501-505.
Rand, A. L. (1954) Social feeding behaviour of birds. Fieldiana Zool.
36: 1-71.
176
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Scott, D. (1984) The feeding success of cattle egrets in flocks. Anim. Vine, I. (1973) Detection of prey flocks by predators. J. Theor. Biol.
Behav. 32: 1089-1100. 40: 207-210.
Seedikkoya, K. (2004) Comparative ecology of certain paddy field
birds with emphasis on the habitat quality. PhD thesis.
University of Calicut, Kerala, India.
K. Seedikkoya, Department of Zoology, MES College, Mampad, Malappuram, Kerala, India. Email:
seedikkoya@yahoo.com
P. A. Azeez, EIA Division, SACON, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, India. Email: azeezpa@uahoo.co.uk
E. A. A. Shukkur, Department of Zoology, Farook College, Calient, Kerala, India.
Longevity record of a colour-ringed Black-faced
Spoonbill Platalea minor
YAT-TUNGYU
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor is endemic to the
eastern fringe of Asia. The known population is small,
only 1,200 individuals (Yat-tungYu 2004) and there¬
fore the species is listed as Endangered (BirdLife
International 2001). In the 1990s, to rescue this
species from the brink of extinction, conservationists
started to study its previously poorly known distribu¬
tion. On 14 July 1995, the first two Black-faced
Spoonbill chicks were colour-ringed in a breeding
colony in North Korea. Both birds were given a yellow
ring on the left tibia; on the right tibia one bird was
given a red ring over a green one and the other had a
red ring over a blue one. Both birds were sighted in the
first winter; the former in Japan and the latter in
Vietnam (S. Chan in litt. 2005). The first bird was also
seen again in its fifth winter and thereafter several
times. Later, some tens of individuals were captured
and marked with unique colour-ring combinations in
their wintering areas in Taiwan and Hong Kong for a
satellite-tracking project in 1998 and 1999 (Ueta et al.
2002).
Plate 1. Colour-ringed Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor
photographed at Mai Po, 4 November 2003. (Photograph by
Yat-tungYu).
OBSERVATIONS
On 9-19 December 1999, Cornelis Swennen and I
visited Xuan Thuy Nature Reserve, Red River delta,
Vietnam to study the wintering ecology of Black-faced
Spoonbills. On 15 December, we noticed a feeding
spoonbill in a drained aquaculture pond. Through a
38x telescope I saw that the bird had a yellow ring on
the left tibia and red over green rings on the right tibia.
The bird was identified as an adult by its red iris, black
upper mandible with some transverse ridges in the
middle, and an almost totally black lower mandible.
The presence or absence of black tips on the primary
feathers could not be established. The bird was not
Plate 2. Colour-ringed Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor
photographed at Mai Po, 23 November 2004. (Photograph
by Pippen Ho).
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
177
subsequently resighted in Xuan Thuy. However, I
rediscovered the same individual in three successive
winters in Mai Po, Hong Kong, on 5 November 2002,
4 November 2003 (Plate 1) and 29 October 2004.
Subsequently, it was photographed on 23 November
2004 by Pippen Ho (Plate 2), and it was seen again on
23 December 2004 (MaTsz Kit in litt. 2005) and by S.
Chan, K.W. Ma and myself on 29 December 2004. No
other sightings of this bird have been recorded in Hong
Kong or elsewhere.
DISCUSSION
To summarise the observations, this bird was recorded
in its first winter in Japan, in its fifth winter in Vietnam,
and its seventh, eighth and ninth winters in Hong
Kong. By its fifth winter the bird’s bare part colours
resembled those of adults. Information about the age
of maturity is lacking (Hancock et al. 1992, del Hoyo et
al. 1992), but Melville et al. (1999) discussed the age
of some captured individuals from the satellite-
tracking project and stated that birds develop
completely white primary feathers by their fifth
calendar year. The bird also provides the first known
longevity record: 9.5 years up to the last observation
on 29 December 2004. The closely related Eurasian
Spoonbill P. leucorodia lives up to at least 28 years
(Cramp and Simmons 1977).
The date of its appearance in Hong Kong was very
similar in the three consecutive years. Although Mai Po
is not systematically searched for colour-ringed Black¬
faced Spoonbills, this site is very well watched by
birdwatchers and bird photographers. The observations
may therefore indicate that the timing of migration is
consistent. They also hint that birds may pass through
Hong Kong to the wintering site in Red River delta.
However, in 2004, the bird was still present at Mai Po
on 29 December and in wing moult, indicating that it
was wintering in Hong Kong. It may have changed its
wintering location because feeding and loafing habitats
in the Xuan Thuy Nature Reserve in Vietnam have
become gradually degraded by human disturbance and
conversion of the intertidal flats into mangrove planta¬
tions (Yat-tungYu and Swennen 2001).
Observations of colour-ringed Black-faced
Spoonbills become more difficult with time because
the colour of rings fades through wear and from the
sun. Observers should be cautious when identifying
ring colours.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank C. Swennen for guiding my study of this globally threatened
species; Simba Chan from Wild Bird Society of Japan for providing
information of colour-ringed Black-faced Spoonbills and giving
comments of this draft; BirdLife International Viemam Programme
office and MaiYueTrung of Xuan Thuy Nature Reserve for facilitat¬
ing and assistance during our visit in the reserve; Pippen Ho for
permitting me to use his photograph and Ma Tsz Kit for reporting
sighting information of this bird.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. eds. (1977) The birds of the Western
Palearctic. Vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Hancock, J. A., Kushlan, J. A. and Kahl, M. P. (1992) Storks, ibises
and spoonbills of the world. London: Academic Press.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Saragatal, J., eds. (1992) Handbook of the
birds of the world. Vol. 1 . Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Melville, D. S., Leader, P. J., and Carey, G. J. (1999) Movements and
biometrics of Black-faced Spoonbills Platalea minor at Mai Po,
Hong Kong in spring 1998. Pp. 19-26 in M. Ueta, R. Kurosawa
and D. Allen, eds. (1999) Conservation and research of the Black¬
faced Spoonbills and their habitats. Tokyo: Wild Bird Society of
Japan.
Ueta, M., Melville, D. S.,Wang, Y., Ozaki, K., Kanai, Y., Leader, P.
J.,Wang, C. C. and Kuo, C. Y. (2002) Discovery of the breeding
site and migration route of Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor.
Ibis 144: 340-343.
Yat-tung Yu (2004) International Black-faced Spoonbill Census:
16-18 January 2004. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Bird Watching
Society.
Yat-tung Yu and Swennen, C. (2001) Is mangrove afforestation
destroying Black-faced Spoonbill habitat in Red River Delta?
Oriental Bird Club Bull. 33: 53-56.
Yat-tungYu, Hong Kong Bird Watching Society. G.P.O. box 12460. Hong Kong. Email: ytyu@hkstar.com
Vocalisation of the White-eared Night Heron
Gorsachius magnificus
BEN KING
On 29 March 2003, I tape-recorded the territorial call
of White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus near
Chebaling Nature Reserve in northern Guangdong
Province, south-eastern China. Prior to this, there
appears to be no published description or tape record¬
ing of a vocalisation of this heron.
White-eared Night Heron has been known at this
site for several years: sightings are regularly made along
a small river near the reserve in the evening just before
dark, sometimes in the morning before sunrise, and
sometimes along the river at night.
On the evening of 27 March 2003, 1 saw an uniden¬
tifiable heron fly by just before dark. No vocalisations
178
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
0 '0 ' ’0
Seconds
Figure 1. Sonagrams of territorial calls of White-eared Night
Heron G. magnificus, Japanese Night Heron G. goisagi and
Malayan Night Heron G. melanolophus. Note that the sonagram
of White-eared Night Heron is of poorer quality owing to a
rather faint recording because of the roar of the river.
were heard. On 28 March, I was better positioned and
got a view of a blackish heron with a broad white streak
on the side of the upper neck. As it flew over me, back¬
lit by the sky, I noted the short (c.3-4 cm) projection of
its feet beyond the tail-tip. Then, landing on a tree on
the opposite side of the river, it raised its full crest. It
called several times and then flew down-river. Its
blackish plumage with a broad white streak on the side
of the upper neck eliminated all other herons except
Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis. The full crest and short
foot projection beyond the tail tip (c.10 cm in Black
Bittern: D. Warakagoda verbally 2003) excludes this
species however.
On the evening of 29 March, the night heron called
for about 10 minutes from a site just up-river from
where I was standing and I recorded all but one of the
calls on tape. Then the bird flew down-river, overhead,
emitting the same call in flight and landed on the same
perch as the previous evening (showing the white neck-
streak and full crest) and called a few more times,
before flying again overhead, circling higher and disap¬
pearing.
The call (presumably a territorial call) was a deep,
throaty, raspy whoaa , about 0.3 seconds in duration,
0.2-0. 5 kHz, repeated at 5-15 second intervals (Fig.
l).This call could easily be mistaken for a large owl. By
comparison, the call of Malayan Night Heron G.
melanolophus is a deep, mellow hoot whoop , about 0.15
sec. in duration, 0.25-0.5 kHz, lacking the throaty,
raspy quality of the White-eared Night Heron. At close
range, a shorter lower second note can be heard. The
Malayan Night Heron’s call is very much like the well¬
spaced introductory notes of the long call of the
Helmeted Hornbill Buceros vigil, which ends in
maniacal laughter. The call of Japanese Night Heron
Gorsachius goisagi is a hollow, mellow hoot whooop, a
little over 0.4 sec. in duration, 0.2-0. 5 kHz, repeated at
intervals of 1-2 seconds, often for long periods. The
call is similar to that of Malayan Night Heron, but it is
longer in duration and down-turned at the end.
In June 1983, in a park in a small city in Honshu,
Japan, I was shown a perch from which a Japanese
Night Heron called at length each evening in May in
the period before nesting. Further, in June 1987, I
heard Malayan Night Heron in south-east Thailand
making its distinctive call for an extended period from
a single place. The observations of White-eared Night
Heron described above suggest a similar behaviour.
Together, these observations suggest that the Asian
Gorsachius night herons have a territorial call given in
the early evening hours, often from a particular perch,
especially in the breeding season.
Systematic notes
While most authors (e.g. Peters 1931, Hancock and
Kushlan 1984, Sibley and Monroe 1990, del Hoyo et
al. 1992, Clements 2000) consider Gorsachius to be a
genus separate from Nycticorax, Payne and Risley
(1976) and Traylor (1979) placed the herons of the
genus Gorsachius in the genus Nycticorax. The
Gorsachius calls described here and their behavioural
usage and context have no counterpart in the genus
Nycticorax (Hancock and Kushlan 1984). This adds to
the suite of characters that distances Gorsachius from
Nycticorax, such as the shorter bill, several different
skull and skeletal characters (Payne and Risley 1976),
plumage differences and solitary nesting, supporting
the separation of Gorsachius and Nycticorax.
While G. melanolophus and G. goisagi are quite close
morphologically, G. magnificus has a different plumage
pattern and a longer, more pointed bill (though still
shorter than Nycticorax spp.). Further, its spotted
juvenile plumage resembles juvenile Nycticorax spp.
more than that of G. melanolophus or G. goisagi.
However, the call and its usage described herein
suggests its closer affinity to Gorsachius. Further study
is necessary to elucidate the generic status of magnificus.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Zoe Fasheng of the South China Institute of Endangered Animals in
the Guangdong Entomological Institute kindly accompanied me to
Chebaling and was most helpful. Geoff Carey, John Fellowes and
Lee Kwok-shing supplied useful information. Jeff Groth prepared
the sonagrams. John Fitzpatrick and Greg Budney of the Macaulay
Library of Natural Sounds at the Laboratory of Ornithology at
Cornell University provided tape recording equipment and other
assistance.
REFERENCES
Clements, J. F. (2000) Birds of the world: a checklist. Vista, California:
Ibis.
Hancock, J. and Kushlan, J. (1984) The herons handbook. London:
Harper and Row.
del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. and Sargatal, J. (1992) Handbook of the birds of
the world. V ol. 1. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Payne, R. B. and Risley, C. J. (1976) Systematics and evolutionary
relationships among the herons (Ardeidae). Misc. Publ. Mus.
Zool. U. Michigan N. 150: 1 115.
Peters, J. L. (1931) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 1. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Traylor, M. A., Jr., ed. (1979) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 1.
Second edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L. Jr. (1990) Distribution and taxonomy
of birds of the world. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ben King, Ornithology Dept. , American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York,
NY 10024, U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthlink.net
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
179
Effect of incubating adult sex and clutch size on egg
orientation in Sarus Cranes Grus antigone
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR and B. C. CHOUDHURY
Egg temperature in natural conditions in birds’ nests is
regulated by adjusting the timing of contact with the
brood-patch (areas of highly vascularised bare skin on
either side of the sternum) and by adjusting heat
transfer during contact. In addition, field research and
incubation experiments on several bird species have
shown that egg position and orientation during incuba¬
tion allows adult birds to effectively adjust egg
temperature (Drent 1975, Massaro and Davis 2004).
Given that eggs have varied shapes and that clutches
can be arranged in various ways with respect to egg
orientation and position, it is possible that birds use the
most efficient combination to regulate required
temperatures (Barta and Szekely 1997, Massaro and
Davis 2004). The orientation and position of eggs in
the nest are relatively easy to measure, but have
received little attention. This is in spite of the fact that
these parameters have a direct bearing on hatching
success (Drent 1975), and that incubation efficiency
appears to have been an important selective pressure
on the evolution of clutch size (Drent 1975, Barta and
Szekely 1997, Reid et al. 2000).
Sarus Cranes Grus antigone , like most other cranes,
normally have one or two eggs per clutch (Meine and
Archibald 1996). For most crane species, average
breeding success at the dispersal stage is close to one
(Johnson and Barnes 1992, Allan 1996, Meine and
Archibald 1996, Coverdale 2004). It is suspected that
the second egg is laid as insurance in case of the loss of
the first one. Alternatively, two eggs may be more
efficient to incubate. In this study, we determined the
orientation of the eggs in the nest bowl, and how it
varied with clutch size and sex of the incubating bird.
METHODS
KSGS located nests of Sarus Cranes during
2000-2001 in Etawah and Mainpuri districts, Uttar
Pradesh, India. Descriptions of the study area and
observations of other aspects of breeding ecology are
presented elsewhere (Sundar 2003, 2004, Sundar and
Choudhury 2003). Sarus Cranes have very large nests
(up to 2 m in diameter), with a normal clutch size of
one or two (Ali and Ripley 1968, Mukherjee 1999,
Suwal 1999), and rarely three (Walkinshaw 1973) or
four eggs (Sundar and Choudhury 2003). At the onset
of incubation, both the male and female develop brood
patches (G. W. Archibald in litt. 2004). Incubation
duties are shared between the sexes; both adults
actively change egg position before commencing an
incubation bout and during incubation periods
(KSGS, personal observation). If humans approach
the nest, incubating adults typically stand and walk
away from the nest taking care not to disturb the eggs.
Sarus Cranes in the study area have been exposed to
human presence for a very long time, and visiting nests
during this study never prompted adults to abandon
them. Most nests were constructed entirely of grasses
and other wetland plants. Eggs usually lay in a concave
depression on the nest when incubated and did not roll
away when adults left the nest. Some nests had very
little nesting material and in these the eggs were laid on
nearly bare ground and tended to roll a little to the side
when the adults rose to walk away. Observations on egg
position from these nests were excluded from the
analysis.
Nests were visited 1-5 times (modal frequency = 2)
during incubation to collect information on egg
position, orientation and hatching success.
Information on egg orientation was collected more
than once for the same nest only if it was at least a week
between the visits, or if the sex of the incubating bird
was different. The first observations were made within
a week of laying in most cases (91%). Adult cranes
were sexed by posture during unison calls, during
which males droop their primaries and touch the
secondaries over their backs. In addition, females in all
the pairs observed were discernibly smaller when both
birds were seen together. Incubating adults always
positioned eggs with the long axis of the eggs parallel
to the long axis of the adult’s body, presumably to align
the eggs with shape of the brood patches. Eggs in one-
and two-egg clutches therefore had limited possible
orientations during incubation (two and four possible
combinations respectively: see Fig. 1). One four-egg
clutch was also found, and this was reduced to a three-
egg clutch when an addled and rotten egg was
discovered prior to hatching and was removed by the
investigator.
It was not possible to study other aspects of incuba¬
tion such as egg shape, egg-turning (which reduces the
incidence of premature adhesion of the extra-embry¬
onic membranes in the first half of the incubation
period) or how the orientation and position of eggs
changed through the course of incubation. Fisher’s
exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to test the
significance of differences in frequency of possible
combinations of egg positions, and for differences
between the sexes and for different clutch sizes.
RESULTS
Of 140 nests visited, egg orientation was observed 75
times in 64 different nests. In one-egg clutches, the
pointed end of the egg was just as likely to point
towards the posterior of the incubating bird (52.4%) as
it was towards the anterior (47.6%, n=21 observations
of both sexes at 20 nests). When males incubated, the
pointed end of the egg appeared to be more likely to be
placed towards the posterior of the bird (8/1 1 cases).
180
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
whereas when females incubated, the pointed end
more often pointed towards the anterior of the bird
(7/10 cases), but this difference was not significant
(Fisher’s exact test, df=l, P= 0.06).
In two-egg clutches, both sexes used all four egg-
orientation combinations nearly equally (x2=4, df=3,
P=0.26, n=22 males, 32 females, 43 nests; Fig. 2).
Only one four-egg clutch was observed once, when
incubated by a male: all four eggs had the pointed end
aligned more-or-less with the posterior of the bird.
When the same nest was observed when clutch size
had been reduced to three (and when it was being
incubated again by the male), the pointed end of two
eggs pointed to the anterior of the bird, and the third
pointed to the posterior.
The positions of eleven pipped eggs (i.e. those
about to hatch) were also observed: all had the pointed
end pointing towards the posterior of the incubating
bird, with the pipped (chipped) part uppermost. In
four nests, clods of earth were placed beside the eggs
by incubating adults apparently to stabilise egg
position, and in one nest dried roots were apparently
used for the same purpose. When these materials were
repeatedly removed by the observer, the adult cranes
replaced them each time, indicating that their presence
was not accidental.
DISCUSSION
Sarus Cranes frequently adjusted the orientation of
eggs in their nests. Eggs were aligned parallel with the
axis of the body of the incubating adult, but there was
no significant preference for eggs to point towards the
anterior or posterior, nor were there significant differ¬
ences between males in females, in either one- or
two-egg clutches. The dimensions of brood patches
often differ on each side of incubating adults, and may
differ between the sexes (Riley 1982). Optimal egg
orientation and position may therefore vary between
individuals. On average, however, there may be no
systematic bias, and this may have generated the non¬
significant results we found. Repeated observations on
the same individuals would have revealed whether
individuals have particular preferences for certain egg
orientations and positions.
A B
Figure 1. Possible combinations of egg orientation in (A)
one-egg and (B) two-egg clutches. Eggs are drawn as seen
from above the nest and arrowheads indicate the anterior of
the incubating bird. Combinations in the upper row of two-
egg clutches show symmetric orientation; combinations in
the lower row show asymmetric orientation.
12 T
io -
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4
Figure 2. Frequency of different combinations of egg orien¬
tation in two-egg clutches incubated by male (solid bars;
n=22) and female (open bars; n=32) Sarus Cranes Grus
antigone. Positions refer to those illustrated for two-egg
clutches in Fig. 1
Observations of egg orientation in the wild in other
crane species are only available for Sandhill Crane G.
canadensis (Walkinshaw 1982). In 49 two-egg clutches,
egg orientation was symmetric in 27 clutches and
asymmetric in 22 clutches, which is consistent with our
results for Sarus Crane. The effect of sex or clutch size
on egg orientation was not recorded by Walkinshaw
(1982).
In some cases, adult Sarus Cranes used clods of
earth and roots to maintain the position of eggs, a
behaviour that had not previously been described in
cranes (Walkinshaw 1973, Johnsgard 1983, Allan
1996, Meine and Archibald 1996). The positioning of
pipped eggs with their pointed ends towards the poste¬
rior of the incubating bird matches the normal
hatching position in captive cranes (Gabel and Mahan
1996), and is not surprising given that chicks are
positioned with their heads towards the broad end of
the egg.
Theory using space-optimising models predicts
that eggs in one-egg clutches should be spherical and
that eggs in larger clutches should have biconical to
ellipsoid shapes in order to obtain the maximum
benefit of the brood patch of incubating adults (Barta
and Szekely 1997). All cranes have ellipsoid eggs,
perhaps indicating a selective advantage (at least in the
past) for multiple-egg clutches. However, in the four-
egg clutch we observed, the nest bowl was too small to
retain all eggs adequately, and eggs were visible from
the side of the incubating bird. This suggests that
incubation efficiency was being compromised and eggs
were being heated inconsistently. When this clutch was
reduced to three eggs, the orientation was such that the
central egg probably received more heat than the outer
eggs. Hence one- or two-egg clutches appear to be
optimal.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
These observations were carried out during field work for the project
‘Impact of land use changes on the ecology and habitat of the Indian
Sarus Crane Grus antigone in the Indo-Gangetic flood plains’ of the
Wildlife Institute of India (WII). We thank S. K. ivfukherjee, Director
of WII, for facilities and infrastructure. Permits to conduct the
studies were kindly granted by R. L. Singh, Chief Wildlife Warden of
Uttar Pradesh. KSGS was supported by fellowships awarded by the
WII during fieldwork, and by the International Crane Foundation
Forktail 2 1 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
181
(ICF) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service during analysis. KSGS
thanks Ranvir Chauhan and family for their hospitality during field
work; S. Chauhan, R. Chauhan, D. Singh and A. Verma for assistance
during fieldwork; G. W. Archibald, J. Barzen, J. Harris, and D.
Ferguson for facilitating fellowships; Shashi and M. S. Rana at WII
for library support; B. Didrickson at ICF for library support and
editorial assistance; S. Kittur for helping with the figures; B. Wright
for providing facilities at the Wildlife Protection Society of India
during the completion of the paper; and G. W. Archibald, M. Putnam
and an anonymous reviewer for providing comments on a previous
draft.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1968) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan. Vol. 2. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Allan, D. G. (1996) A review of the biology and conservation status
of cranes. Pp. 13-51 in R. D. Beilfuss,W. R. Tarboton and N. N.
Gichuki, eds. Proceedings 1993 African Crane and Wetland Training
Workshop. Baraboo, Wisconsin: International Crane Foundation.
Barta, Z. and Szekely, T. (1997) The shape of the avian egg. Funct.
Ecol. 1 1: 656-662.
Coverdale, B. (2004) Analysis ofWattled Crane ( Bugeranus caruncu-
latus ) egg measurements. Indwa 2: 16-22.
Drent, R. (1975) Incubation. Pp. 333-420 in D. S. Farmer, J. R.
King and K. C. Parkes, eds. Avian Biology. Volume 5. New York:
Academic Press.
Gabel, R. R. and Mahan, T. A. (1996) Incubation and hatching. Pp.
59-76 in D. H. Ellis, G. F. Gee and C. M. Mirande, eds. Cranes:
their biology, husbandry and conservation. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, and
Baraboo, Wisconsin: International Crane Foundation.
Johnsgard, P. A. (1983) Cranes of the world. Indiana, U.S. A: Indiana
University Press.
Johnson, D. N. and Barnes, P R. (1992) The breeding biology of the
wattled crane in Natal. Pp. 377-385 in J. Harris, ed. Proceedings
of the 1987 International Crane Workshop. Baraboo, Wisconsin:
International Crane Foundation.
Massaro, M. and Davis, L. S. (2004) Preferential incubation
positions for different sized eggs and their influence on incuba¬
tion period and hatching asynchrony in Snares crested ( Eudyptis
robustus) and yellow-eyed penguins ( Megadyptes antipodes).
Bchav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 426-434.
Meine, C. D. and Archibald, G. W. (1996) Cranes: status survey and
conservation action plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge,
U.K.: IUCN.
Mukherjee, A. (1999) Ecological study on the Indian Sarus Crane
Grus antigone in the central Gujarat. Ph.D. thesis. Saurashtra
University, Rajkot, India.
Reid, J. M., Monaghan, P. and Ruxton, G. D. (2000) The conse¬
quences of clutch size for incubation conditions and hatching
success in starlings. Funct. Ecol. 14: 560-565.
Riley, J. O. (1982) Natural and artificial incubation of crane eggs:
implications for captive propagation. Pp. 213-218 in J. C. Lewis,
ed. Proceedings 1981 Crane Workshop. Tavernier, Florida, U.S.A.:
National Audubon Society.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2003) Notes on the breeding biology of the Black¬
necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Etawah and
Mainpuri districts, Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 15-20.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2004) Group size and habitat use by Black-necked
Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in an agriculture-dominated
landscape in Uttar Pradesh, India. Bird Conserv. Internat. 14:
323-334.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2003) Nest sanitation in
Sarus Cranes Grus antigone in Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19:
144-146.
Suwal, R. N. (1999) Studies on the habitat preference, movements,
nesting and population dynamics of Sarus Cranes in Lumbini.
M.Sc. thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kirthipur, Nepal.
Walkinshaw, L. H. (1973) Cranes of the world. New York: Winchester
Press.
Walkinshaw, L. H. (1982) Nesting of the Florida Sandhill Crane in
central Florida. Pp. 53-62 in J. C. Lewis, ed. Proceedings 1981
Crane Workshop. Tavernier, Florida, USA: National Audubon
Society.
K. S. Gopi Sundar * and B. C. Choudhury, Wildlife Institute of India, Post Bag 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001,
India. * Correspondence and present address: Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group, do International Crane
Foundation, E - 1 1376, Shady Lane Road, Baraboo, Wisconsin 53913-0447, U.S. A. Email:
gopi@savingcranes.org.
First record of Long-billed Plover Charadrius
placidus in Singapore
VOLKER KONRAD
On the morning of 24 February 1990, I visited the
coast south of Changi airport, Singapore, and walked
north-east along the beach at the far end of the East
Coast Parkway and the beginning of the Changi Coast
Road. The weather conditions were good. Just before
12h00, I found a solitary Charadrius sp. plover on the
sandy beach close to the water’s edge. I observed it for
10 minutes at a distance of 25 m as it stood resting.
When I approached closer it ran a few metres in a
typical Charadrius manner, to keep a minimum
distance of several metres away from me. I observed
the bird for a total of c.25 minutes, taking notes and
photographs from a distance of c.12 m.
My first impression had been that of a fairly large,
relatively strong, almost massive Charadrius sp. plover.
I assumed it was either Lesser Sand Plover C. mongolus
or Greater Sand Plover C. leschenaultii, but soon came
to the conclusion that it was something different. In
size, it was obviously stronger and heavier than Little
Ringed Plover C. dubius, probably larger than Common
Ringed Plover C. hiaticula, close in size to Lesser Sand
Plover, but probably too small for a Greater Sand
Plover. It was rather large-headed and long-tailed, with
the tail very clearly projecting beyond the wing-tip. The
legs were thin and long, providing a high stance. They
were pale greenish, perhaps even yellowish, but
182
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Plate 1. Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus, Singapore,
24 February 1990.
appeared dark due to the extreme light conditions at
noon. The bill appeared to be black; it was fairly long,
stronger at the base, but generally thin with a pointed
tip. On the ‘face’ there was an extensive area of white
on the forehead, with a short white supercilium
extending to at least above the middle of the eye. The
white almost surrounded the bill-base and merged into
the white throat. There was only a faint and thin brown
loral stripe from the eye to the bill, often hardly
discernible. A very dark, blackish patch around the eye
extended to the ear-coverts, and merged into the
brown crown and nape. There was no white eye-ring. A
complete white collar — very thin on hind-neck — joined
the white throat. There was a complete but thin breast-
band, very thin and brown on the upper breast, a little
wider and rather blackish-brown on the sides of the
neck, there merging into dark brown on the ‘shoul¬
ders’, mantle, upperwing. The dark brown on the
crown, nape, mantle and upperwing appeared cold and
colourless with no warm tinge in the hard noon light,
but the fore-crown appeared a little warmer. The wing-
tip was very dark blackish-brown. The breast, flanks,
belly and undertail-coverts were snow-white. The
white protruded onto the neck-sides in front of the
bend of the wing and extended conspicuously onto the
uppertail-coverts, so that only the centre of the tail-tip
appeared black. The outer rectrices and the tail-base
appeared to be all white, the latter probably because of
the fluffed-up undertail-coverts. The bird did not call
and was not seen in flight.
Later I consulted the literature available to me (Ali
and Ripley 1969, Lekagul and Cronin 1974, King et al.
1975, Wild Bird Society of Japan 1 982, and Hayman et
al. 1986), and identified the bird as Long-billed Plover
Charadrius placidus , probably an adult female
approaching breeding plumage. Greater Sand Plover
was excluded mainly on structure, being bigger,
longer-legged, with a higher stance. Lesser Sand Plover
is shorter-tailed, with no attenuated appearance. Both
these species also have different-shaped bills and lack
the white collar and thin blackish-brown breast-band.
The smaller Charadrius spp. were eliminated by size
and structure (lacking the bulky body, big head, bill
shape, leg proportions, and long tail) and plumage
(colour and pattern of face, crown, collar and breast-
band). In particular, Common Ringed Plover was
excluded on basis of general structure, bill and leg
colour. Little Ringed Plover is smaller, more delicate,
and has a whitish eye-ring and very thin bill. Kentish
Plover C. alexandrinus and its South-East Asian
relatives are much smaller and lack complete breast-
bands.
From Hails and Jarvis (1987) I realised that this
species was new to Singapore. I submitted the record
to the Singapore Records Committee, who accepted it
in November 1998. It remains the only accepted
record for Singapore to date (Lim Kim Seng in litt.
2005). Long-billed Plover breeds in western, northern,
central and north-east China, North Korea and Japan,
and winters in Nepal, north-east India, southern
China, Taiwan and North and South Korea (Hayman
et al. 1986). It is a rare winter visitor to South-East
Asia, where it has been recorded from north and
central Myanmar, north-west and central Thailand,
north and central Laos, east Tonkin and central
Annam. It is a vagrant to Peninsular Malaysia (Robson
2000).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Yang Pah Liang and Angus Lamont for their
assistance and support in taking up the case and following up with
the Singapore Records Committee. I thank Lim Kim Seng of the
Singapore Records Committee for informing me of their confirma¬
tion. I thank Axel Braunlich for help, support and guidance in
preparing this paper.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1969) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan together with those of Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Ceylon.
Vol. 2. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Hails, C. and Jarvis, F (1987) Birds of Singapore. Singapore: Times
Editions.
Hayman, R, Marchant, J. and Prater, T. (1986) Shorebirds: an identi¬
fication guide to the waders of the world. London: Croom Helm.
King, B., Woodcock, M. and Dickinson, E. C. (1975) A field guide to
the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Lekagul B. and Cronin, E. W. jr. (1974) Bird guide of Thailand.
Second edition. Bangkok: Kurusapa Ladprao Press.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia.
London: New Holland.
Wild Bird Society of Japan (1982) A field guide to the birds of Japan.
Tokyo: Wild Bird Society of Japan.
I /olker Konrad, Moltkestrafie 6, D-37603 Holzminden, Germany. Email: HOLbird@gmx.de
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
183
New sites for Mrs Hume’s Pheasant Syrmaticus
humiae in north-east India based on hunters’
specimens and local reports
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
Mrs Hume’s Pheasant Syrmaticus humiae is a poorly
known globally threatened (Vulnerable) species
(BirdLife International 2004). It is thinly distributed in
the hill tracts of north-eastern India, north and west
Myanmar, south-west China and north Thailand (Ali
and Ripley 1987, Fuller and Garson 2000, Han Lian-
xian 1997). Very little current information on its status
and distribution is available (Fuller and Garson 2000,
BirdLife International 2001). Recent fieldwork in
north-east India prior to this study had resulted in few
records (Katju 1996, Kaul et al 1996, Choudhury
1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, Robson 1999). No previous
survey had specifically targeted the species.
I carried out surveys in Nagaland, Manipur and
Mizoram during 1996-2004 to assess the current
distribution and status of the species, mainly from
hunters’ specimens and local reports.
METHODS
I carried out surveys in: Nagaland in June 1996,
January, February, April and October 2001, February
2002 and February 2004; Manipur in January 1996,
January 2001, October 2001 and February 2002; and
Mizoram in April 2000 and February 2001. These
states are almost entirely mountainous. The climate is
monsoonal with hot wet summers and cool dry winters
(although winter rains are also not uncommon);
annual rainfall is 1,000-6,000 mm. Camps where I
stayed during surveys included: Imphal, Moreh,
Churachandpur, Tamenglong, Kaikao, Ukhrul and
Tongtao in Manipur; Kohima, Zunheboto, Pungro,
Fakim, Thanamir, Kiphire, Waziho, Wokha,
Mokokchung,Tuensang and Noklak in Nagaland; and
Aizawl, Lunglei, Lawngtlai, Saiha, Champhai,
Khawmawi, Phura, Farpak, Vapar, Ngopa andTeirei in
Mizoram. I examined specimens in villages, including
snared individuals, dried skins, and tail feathers. I
assumed (after interviewing the hunters and visiting
the reported sites of hunting/ trapping) that all speci¬
mens had been captured locally. I interviewed villagers
and forest department officials and used coloured illus¬
trations of Mrs Hume’s Pheasant and similar species to
question them about its occurrence. From these
discussions, I categorised the abundance of the species
at each site as: ‘not uncommon’ (where it is regularly
snared and where most villagers could recognise illus¬
trations), ‘rare’ (where it is occasionally snared and
where most villagers could recognise illustrations), and
‘very rare’ (where it is rarely snared and where few
villagers could recognise illustrations). Although highly
subjective and potentially unreliable, these categories
give at least some idea of relative abundance.
DISTRIBUTION
I observed the species at three previously known sites
(Shiroi, Murlen and Phawngpui), recorded 20 new
sites based on live captured birds or preserved speci¬
mens in villages, and identified an additional 24 new
sites where villagers reported the species (Appendix,
Fig. 1). In Nagaland, BirdLife International (2001)
Figure 1. Map showing location of sites where Mrs Hume’s
Pheasant has been recorded or reported in Nagaland,
Manipur and Mizoram. Numbers correspond to those in
Table 1. Shaded area indicates presumed distribution.
184
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
listed the Naga Hills as the only area in the state from
which the species was known, based on pre-1917 sight¬
ings and specimens (Baker 1921-1930, 1922-1930),
and by a 1950 local report (Ripley 1952). I recorded
preserved specimens in ten locations, with local reports
from a further four (Appendix). Hence it appears that
the species is still widely distributed in the hills of
south and east Nagaland, but it is absent or very rare
in the Barail Range.
In Manipur, BirdLife Internatoinal (2001) listed
four sites for the species: Dzuko valley, Karong, Ukhrul
and Siroi, and wrongly assumed Phailenkot (a site in
Manipur) to be at or near Phaileng in Mizoram
(Appendix). I observed live birds from two villages and
specimens in four others, plus local people reported
the species at eight further sites (Appendix) . It appears
that the species is still widely distributed in the hills of
north-eastern Manipur in Ukhrul district and north¬
east Senapati district. Elsewhere in the state it is very
rare or sparsely distributed. In Tamenglong district,
villagers reported that it does not occur along the
Barak river, corroborating Higgins (1933-1934) who
noted that it occurred only up to the valley of Irang
river, a tributary of the Barak. The continued occur¬
rence of this species at Karong and Phailenkot,
Senapati district is doubtful in view of the complete
habitat destruction and fairly dense human popula¬
tions at these sites.
In Mizoram, BirdLife International (2001) listed
Murlen National Park and Phawngpui (Blue
Mountain) National Park for the species (and incor¬
rectly located Phailenkot in Mizoram: see above). I
recorded specimens at seven other sites, and local
people reported the species at an additional 12 sites. It
appears that Mrs Hume’s Pheasant is still widely
distributed at higher altitudes in east Mizoram,
especially in Champhai and Saiha districts and
possibly in Lunglei and Serchhip districts.
The species has never been recorded in Assam,
although it might be expected to occur in extreme
eastern parts of the North Cachar Hills bordering
Nagaland and Manipur. However, there were no local
reports.
HABITAT AND POPULATION
The areas where Mrs Hume’s Pheasant were reported
to occur are hilly or mountainous, with tropical
evergreen forest at lower altitudes (up to
1,200-1,500 m) and subtropical broadleaved forest on
hilltops. The pheasants occurred in both habitats; in
the lower altitude tropical forests they favoured forest
edges bordering abandoned jhurn areas (slash-and-
burn shifting cultivation). Birds were reported to occur
at c. 1,000-2,200 m in Nagaland (possibly higher at
Saramati), c. 1,000-2,750 m in Manipur and
c. 1,000-2,100 m in Mizoram. This accords well
published information: 850-2,000 m in north-east
India (Ali and Ripley 1987) and 1,200-2,800 m in
adjacent areas of Myanmar (Smythies 1986). I
estimate from maps and field surveys that the area of
remaining habitat (including undisturbed areas of
secondary forest) at suitable altitudes is very approxi¬
mately 1,600, 1,700 and 1,300 km2 respectively in
Nagaland, Manipur and Mizoram. Particularly impor¬
tant districts in terms of area of suitable remaining
habitat include Phek and Kiphire (Nagaland), Ukhrul
and Senapati (Manipur), and Champhai (Mizoram).
Population density estimates for Mrs Hume’s Pheasant
in China range from 8.9 to 33 individuals per km2 (Lu
Taichun 1991, Li Xiangtao 1996). Taking the lowest
estimate, and assuming that pheasants occupy just
10% of the 4,600 km2 of potential habitat, a minimum
population size of 4,000 birds seems likely. This
suggests that McGowan and Garson’s (1995) estimate
of c. 1,000 for the humiae subspecies in north-east
India and ‘a few thousand individuals’ in total may be
an underestimate.
THREATS
Habitat loss is a major threat to Mrs Hume’s Pheasant.
Forest is mainly lost through felling of trees and clear¬
ance for jhum cultivation. Closed-canopy forest cover
declined from 43% to 21% during 1972-1995 in
Nagaland, 51% to 22% during 1980-1995 in Manipur
and 63% to 21% during 1972-1995 in Mizoram
(NRSA 1983, FSI 1997). Mrs Hume’s Pheasant
favours forest edge with good ground cover, as is found
in older abandoned jhums. However, the time that
jhutns are left fallow has become reduced from 10-20
years to 3-4 years, so the extent of suitable habitat is
declining. During winter, accidental and deliberate
fires destroy large areas of habitat. Habitat loss also
results in fragmentation, which is particularly conspic¬
uous in Mizoram where the remaining suitable habitat
is found in isolated pockets.
The ultimate cause of increasing habitat destruc¬
tion is the very rapid human population growth.
During 1971-2001, the population grew from 0.33 to
0.89 million in Mizoram, 0.5 to 2.0 million in
Nagaland, and 1 . 1 to 2.4 million in Manipur. Since the
bulk of the rural population practice jhum cultivation
as their main occupation, continuing large-scale
destruction of natural habitat seems inevitable.
At present there are only five protected areas in the
range of Mrs Hume’s Pheasant. In Manipur, it has not
been reported from any protected area. In Mizoram, it
has been recorded in Murlen National Park (150 km2),
Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary (80 km2) and Phawngpui
(Blue Mountain) National Park (50 km2), which
together cover c.21% of the potential habitat in
Mizoram. In Nagaland, it has been reported from the
tiny Fakim Wildlife Sanctuary (6.4 km2) where it
appears to be very rare. All these together cover only
c.6 per cent of the total potential habitat in these three
states.
Trapping with crude snares and shooting with guns
are major threats throughout the range of the species.
All the tribes inhabiting the hills of Nagaland, Manipur
and Mizoram hunt birds for food. Trappers target all
galliforms, not Mrs Hume’s Pheasant specifically. The
species has been accorded the highest protection under
the Wild Life (Protection) Act (1972) of India.
However, most villagers are unaware of this legal
status. Even in protected areas the enforcement is
inadequate. Trade in the species is insignificant. One
live bird believed to be from Myanmar was on sale at
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
185
Champhai market in Mizoram on 6 January 2001
(Zachuanga in litt. 2004). A male caught near Heka,
Senapati district, Manipur was found for sale in nearby
Poilwa village, Nagaland for Rs 500 (c.$10) in 1999.
Guerrilla insurgency is still significant in Manipur,
but is no longer a problem in Mizoram and Nagaland.
While the extremists themselves do not harm wildlife
in most cases, lawlessness leads to increased illegal
felling and poaching.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Protected areas should be designated at Saramati-
Fakim (500 km2) and Mt Ziphu (50 km2) in Nagaland,
Shiroi (50 km2) and Anko Range (400 km2) in
Manipur. Smaller community-run sanctuaries (<10
km2) should be established near Chizami-Luzaphemi
and Reguri-Lephori in Nagaland, near Kamjong and
Jessami in Manipur, and near Ngur, North Diltlang
and Artlang in Mizoram. Existing protected areas
should be extended at Murlen, Lengteng and
Phawngpui in Mizoram. Within protected areas there
needs to be better control of poaching, jhum cultivation
and fire, and environmental awareness programmes are
needed in fringing villages. Ecotourism could be devel¬
oped considerably. Finally, family planning
programmes are needed throughout the region.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the Oriental Bird Club for the Forktail-Leica
Award of 2000, which helped greatly in the field. For assistance in
the field, I would like to thank the following in Manipur: R. K.
Ranjan Singh, Sameer Khan, K. Muivah; in Mizoram: N. Pradhan,
M. Goswami; in Nagaland: Thomas Kent, Khekiho Sohe, N.
Keditsu; T. Imlong, S. Yingle Theviiry of Letsam, Thepukedu of
Chizami, Thozhupu Mekrisu of Luzaphemi, Kote of Reguri, H.
Shou and T. Torechu (our host at Pungro); in Guwahati: Ratul
Talukdar and Hakim ofThe Rhino Foundation for Nature in North¬
east India. Special thanks go to my late father, Alauddin Choudhury,
who introduced me to Manipur in 1988 and with whom I saw my
first live Mrs Hume’s Pheasant at Imphal Zoo. He was also of
constant help during my subsequent field trips to Manipur and
Nagaland.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of
Indian subcontinent. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Baker, E. C. S. (1921-1930) The game birds of India, Burma and
Ceylon. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society.
Baker, E. C. S. (1922-1930) The fauna of British India: birds.
London: Taylor and Francis.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Choudhury, A. U. (1992) Wildlife in Manipur: a preliminary survey.
Tiger paper 19(1): 20-28.
Choudhury, A. U. (1997) The imperiled biodiversity of Nagaland.
Sanctuary Asia 17(2): 38-45.
Choudhury, A. U. (1998) Manipur: a biodiversity threatened.
Sanctuary Asia 18(4): 30-39.
Choudhury, A. U. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati, India:
Gibbon Books and WWF-India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2001) Some bird records from Nagaland, north¬
east India. Forktail 17: 91-103.
FSI (1997) The state of the forest report. Dehra Dun, India: Forest
Survey of India.
Fuller, R. A. and Garson, P. J., eds. (2000) Pheasants: status survey
and conservation action plan 2000-2004. Reading, U.K. and
Gland, Switzerland: Pheasant Specialist Group and World
Pheasant Association.
Ghose, D. (1997) Report of the Blyth’s Project: study conducted
between February and May 1997. Unpublished interim report.
Ghose, D. (2000) Hume’s Pheasant sightings in Mizoram, India.
Tragopan 12: 14.
Han Lian-xian (1997) Study on distribution and habitat of
Syrmaticus humiae in Yunnan. Chinese J. Biodiv. 5 (3): 185-189.
Higgins, J. C. (1933-1934) The game birds and animals of the
Manipur state with notes on their numbers, migration and
habits. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 36: 406-422.
Katju, D. (1996) Pheasants in Mizoram, India; an impression.
Tragopan 5: 9-10.
Kaul, R., Ahmed, A. and Katju, D. (1996) Wildlife studies in north¬
east India IV. Report to WPA/Peter Scott Trust. Unpublished
report.
Li Xiangtao (1996) The gamebirds of China: their distribution and
status. Beijing: International Academic Publishers.
Lu Taichun, ed. (1991) The endangered wild galliformes in China.
Fuzhou, China: Fujian Science and Technology Publishing
House. (In Chinese).
McGowan, P. J. K. and Garson, P. J. (1995) Pheasants: status survey
and conservation action plan 1995-1999. Gland, Switzerland:
IUCN.
NRSA (1983) Mapping of forest cover in India from satellite imagery,
1 972-75 and 1 980-82. Summary Report: North Eastern
States/Union Territories. Hyderabad, India: National Remote
Sensing Agency.
Ripley, S. D. (1952) A collection of birds from the Naga Hills. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 50: 475-514.
Robson, C. R. (1999) From the field. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 29: 52.
Smythies, B. E. (1986) The birds of Burma. Third edition. Liss, U.K.:
Nimrod Press, and Pickering, Ontario: Silvio Mattachione and
Co.
Anwaruddin Choudhury, Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate) , Baksa. Correspondence: Rhino Foundation,
Guwahati 781 007, Assam, India. Email: badrul@sify.com
APPENDIX
Sites in Nagaland, Manipur and Mizoram where Mrs Hume’s Pheasant has been recorded or reported.
186
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Key
A = not uncommon; B = rare; C = very rare; P = preserved specimen; L = local reports (see methods).
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
187
Significant records of birds in Nagaland,
north-east India
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
Nagaland (25"01'-10'N 93°15'-17'E), a state in north¬
east India, has a rich birdlife, with 492 species listed so
far (Choudhury 2003a). However, few ornithological
surveys have been carried out in Nagaland. Examples
include Godwin-Austen (1872, 1874a, b, 1876, 1878),
Coltart (1902), Hutchinson (1946), Stonor (1947),
Koelz (1951, 1952), Ripley (1952) and Alexander
(1974), and more recently Choudhury (1997a,b, 2001,
2002, 2003b).
I carried out further surveys during 14 days in
February 2004 in the districts of Kohima,
Mokokchung, Peren, Wokha, and Tuensang (Fig. 1).
Fieldwork covered tropical semi-evergreen, subtropical
broadleaved forests and small areas of temperate
broadleaved forest, and ranged from 200 to 2,700 m.
Observations were carried out from transects along
existing paths and roads. Preserved specimens and pets
were examined opportunistically in villages. Here I
report records of species that were new for Nagaland
or for which there are few records from the state.
IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife International
(2004) and restricted-range status follows Stattersfield
et al. (1998). Localities are detailed in Table 1.
SIGNIFICANT RECORDS
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea
Two were seen in Doyang reservoir on 19 February
2004. This was only the second confirmed record from
the state, following one in Intanki National Park in
1991 (Choudhury 2001). The species was also
reported by local people from Shilloi lake, Phek
district.
Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli
Near Threatened. One casque seen at a house in
Noklak on 23 February 2004 indicated that the species
probably still occurs (or at least recently occurred) in
Tuensang district, although local people reported that
Figure 1. Map of Nagaland, India, showing localities of significant records.
188
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
it was now extremely rare owing to hunting. The
species has been previously recorded in Nagaland only
from the Khelma-Intanki area (Choudhury 2001).
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis
Vulnerable. One casque seen at a house at Noklak on
23 February 2004 indicated that the species probably
still occurs (or at least recently occurred) in Tuensang
district, although it was reported by hunters to be seen
only occasionally. The species has been previously
recorded from the Barail range and Intanki National
Park (Choudhury 2001). In 2001-2002, its presence in
the Saramati-Fakim area was indicated by evidence
such as casques and feathers. Unlike in other parts of
Nagaland where the tail-feathers of Great Hornbill
Buceros bicornis are used in ceremonial headgear, in
Saramati-Fakim tail-feathers from Rufous-necked
Hornbill are used. Hunting appears to have been the
main factor causing its disappearence from most of
Nagaland.
Large Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx sparverioid.es
A single silent bird was seen twice between Noklak and
Chingthang saddle at about 1,100 m elevation on 24
February 2004 (although two individuals may have
been involved). This was only the second record for
Nagaland, following a dead bird recorded in Kohima
market (Choudhury 2001). Both records were from
winter months, which is rather unusual as this species
is mainly considered a summer breeding visitor (Ali
and Ripley 1987).
Grass Owl Tyto capensis
A specimen was examined at New Pangsha village on
24 February 2004 and the following measurements
were taken: length = c.38 cm (neck slightly stretched);
wing = 30 cm; bill = 3 cm; tarsus = 10 cm. This was
only the second record for Nagaland.
Spot-bellied Eagle Owl Bubo nipalensis
A nestling was collected by villagers from nearYannu
in May 2003 and subsequently kept as a pet. It was still
alive on 29 February 2004 at Kohima. A nestling owl,
probably of this species, was seen at Chingthang saddle
on 23 February 2004. There are two previous records:
one listed by Hume (1888) and a bird in Kohima zoo
from Jakhama (Choudhury 2001).
Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus
One was seen perched in a leafless tree, then flying, on
an open hill slope at 1,000 m between Chore and
Trongar on 22 February 2004. This was only the
second record from the state following a record in
Zunheboto district in 1996 (Choudhury 2001).
Common Buzzard Buteo buteo
The first record for Nagaland was a pale morph bird of
the subspecies japonicus seen in flight near Botsa at
about 1,400 m on 18 and 25 February 2004. On the
first date it was observed soaring over degraded habitat
and patches of cultivation, and then flew towards a
forested hilltop; it was watched for about seven
minutes. On the second occasion it was seen at the
same spot for about five minutes. In flight, its pale
creamy-buff throat, cheeks and underparts with a
brown belly/ thigh-patch were clearly visible. There was
heavy dark streaking on the breast and prominent dark
carpal patches on the underwing. The underwing-
coverts were pale brownish-buff and the primaries and
secondaries were whitish from below. The upperparts
were visible only when the bird banked; they appeared
brownish. The undertail was pale; the uppertail was
grey-brown with dark bars. The bird appeared notice¬
ably smaller than Upland Buzzard B. hemilasius,
although I could not make direct comparisons. It was
distinguished from Long-legged Buzzard B. rufinus by
its smaller size and lack of any rufous on the under¬
wing, lower breast and belly.
Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
Local people reported that hundreds of individuals of
this species were killed around Doyang lake and near
Chongtongya and Mongsenimti in November 2003
and then sold locally. I examined a number of
Table 1. Details of localities mentioned in the text.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
189
preserved wings and tarsi of this species. Two pets seen
inWokha had been caught near the town in November
2003. Villagers reported that thousands roost in trees
below Chongtongya village. This species was first
recorded for the state only recently (Choudhury
2003b).
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
The first record for Nagaland was one seen sitting on
top of a telephone post between Noklak and Lang
bridge (c.26"14'N 95°03'E) at c. 1,200 m in a cultivated
valley on 24 February 2004. I observed it for about
seven minutes and identified it as F. p. peregrinator by
the dark grey upperparts, and black hood and
moustache, rufous breast and whitish cheeks, throat
and sides of neck. The cere and orbital skin were
yellow. It was sitting in such a position that the remain¬
der of the underparts was not visible. It was
distinguished from the similar Oriental Hobby F.
severus by its conspicuously larger size, stockier build
and whitish rather than rufous throat.
Burmese Shrike Lanins collurioid.es
One was seen between Tuensang and Mokokchung on
22 February 2004 in an area of scrub and abandoned
cultivation. Previously recorded near Satoi on 28 June
1996 and at Kohima market in 1997 (Choudhury
2001), the seasonal status of this species in Nagaland is
unclear. It is considered a passage migrant elsewhere in
the region (Grimmett et al. 1998).
Blue-fronted Robin Cinclidium frontale
The first record for Nagaland was a male seen 8 km
north-west of Noklak towards Chingthang saddle
(c.26°14'N 95°0'E) at c. 1,700 m on 23 February 2004.
It perched on a rock by the side of the road for about
two minutes and then moved into dense undergrowth.
The upperparts and underparts were deep blue, with a
glistening paler blue forehead and short supercilium
(to above the eyes) and patch on the bend of the wing.
The belly was paler; the tail was deep blue and when
fanned it was seen to lack any white, eliminating the
possibility ofWhite-tailed Robin Myiomela leucura.
Hodgson’s Redstart Phoenicians hodgsoni
One was seen near a bridge on the fast-flowing Lang
river between Noklak and Pangsha on 24 February
2004. There have been few records subsequent to
Godwin-Austen (1876) and Ripley (1952).
Brown-capped Laughingthrush Garrulax austeni
Restricted-range. A single bird was observed for about
ten minutes on the Barail range between Khonoma
and Dzukou valley (c.25°37'N 94"0'E) at c.2,300 m on
28 February 2004. The location was just outside
Khonoma Nature Conservation and Tragopan
Sanctuary, a protected area declared by the local
village council. The bird was skulking on the ground in
a shady area and allowed observation from as close as
5 m. It was rufous-brown above with white tips to the
greater coverts and tertials; the breast was rufous-
brown with white scaling, more prominent on the belly.
The outer webs to the primaries were whitish, forming
a paler wing-panel. The head was rufous-brown buff
with streaks on the nape; the bill was black. The
sighting was significant as none was recorded during
surveys in Kohima market where many species of
laughingthrushes were common (Choudhury 1991),
and the last confirmed record for the state was more
than five decades ago (Ripley 1952).
Grey Sibia Heterophasia gracilis
Restricted-range. Groups of 2-3 individuals were seen
on three occasions at 1,700-1,800 m between
Chingthang saddle and Noklak on 23 February 2004.
Other groups were observed on 27 February 2004
between Khonoma and Dziilakie and between
Dziilakie and Dulum Roi bridge in degraded hill forest
with shrubs and a few tall trees. The species was also
recorded by Choudhury (2001), but there are very few
other recent records (Grimmett et al. 1998).
White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri
Restricted-range. Two groups of at least seven birds
each were seen at 9 1cm north-west of Noklak towards
Chingthang saddle (c.26"14'N 94' 59'E) at c. 1,700 m
on 23 February 2004. There have been few recent
records of this species (Choudhury 2001).
DISCUSSION
Logging, jhum (shifting) cultivation and poaching for
food and local trade are the main conservation issues
in Nagaland. The area of closed-canopy forest (canopy
cover >40%) declined from 42.8% of Nagaland in
1972-1975 to 21% by 1995 (NRSA 1983, FSI 1997).
Birds are regularly shot, trapped with crude snares or
killed with slingshot for food. Often the birds are sold
for food in local markets. However, owing to efforts by
various conservation activists, the sale of birds in the
main Kohima market has decreased significantly.
Many village councils have banned hunting in their
community forest, while some have even declared such
forests as ‘bird sanctuaries’ (e.g. at Khonoma and
Ghukhiye). Enforcement of anti-poaching laws in the
field is virtually non-existent. The existing protected
area network in Nagaland covers only 1.3% of the
state. Except for Intanki, all protected areas are tiny.
Formation of new and larger protected areas such as
Saramati-Fakim (500 km2), Satoi (100 km2), Barails
(200 km2 encompassing Dzukou-Japfu), and Mt
Zephu (50 km2), plus improved protection for existing
sanctuaries are recommended. The Forest Department
should also start enforcing the Wildlife (Protection)
Act, at least in the main markets.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
For help and assistance during fieldwork I would like to thank
Neisatuo Keditsu, Thomas Kent, Tsile Sakhire and his wife, Aselie
Meyase, Khekiho Sohe, Hakim, Tsangchingla Imlong, P. Rendhy
Jamir, Wapang Ao, P. Nungshi LKR, Aoyemen Chang, Peshing and
his wife, H. Shou, Musho, Vedpal Singh, N. Lotha and Avi Lotha. I
also thank the Oriental Bird Club for its prestigious OBC-
WildWings Conservation Award 2002, which enabled me to carry
out these observations.
190
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
REFERENCES
Alexander, H. G. (1974) Severny years of birdwatching.
Berkhamsted, U.K.:T. & A. D. Poyser.
All, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of
India and Pakistan. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004.
CD-ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Choudhury, A. U. (1997a) The imperilled biodiversity ofNagaland.
Sanctuary Asia 17(2): 38-45.
Choudhury, A. U. (1997b) New localities for Blyth’s Tragopan
from Nagaland. World Pheasant Assoc. News 52: 13-15.
Choudhury, A. U. (2001) Some bird records from Nagaland,
north-east India. Forktail 17: 91-103.
Choudhury, A. U. (2002) Survey of Mrs Hume’s Pheasant in NE
India. Tech, report no. 5. Guwahati:The Rhino Foundation for
Nature in NE India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2003a) A pocketguide to the birds of Nagaland.
Guwahati: Gibbon Books and The Rhino Foundation for
Nature in NE India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2003b) Some additions to the birds of
Nagaland, north-east India. Forktail 19: 150.
Coltart, H. N. (1902) Nidification of Ogle’s Laughing-thrush
Dryonastes nuchalis. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 14: 609.
FSI (1997) State of forest report. Dehra Dun: Forest Survey of India.
Godwin-Austen, H. H. (1872) Third list of birds obtained in the
Ivhasi and Garo hill ranges, with some corrections and
additions to the former lists. J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal 41(2):
142-143.
Godwin-Austen, H. H. (1874a) Description of ten new birds from
the Naga Hills and Munipur Valley, N. E. frontier of Bengal.
Proc. Zool. Soc. London 44: 43-48.
Godwin-Austen, H. H. (1874b). Description of a new Sibia from
the Naga Hills, northeast frontier, Bengal. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.
(4) 13 : 160-161.
Godwin-Austen, H. H. (1876) Fifth list of birds from the hill
ranges of the North-East Frontier of India. J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal
45(2): 191-204.
Godwin-Austen, H. H. (1878) Sixth list of birds from the hill
ranges of the North-East Frontier of India. J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal
47(2): 2-25.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp,T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Hume, A. O. (1888) The birds of Manipur, Assam, Sylhet and
Cachar. Stray Feathers 11: 1-353.
Hutchinson, R. E. (1946) The White-winged Wood-duck Asarcornis
scutulata (Muller). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 46: 402—403.
I<oelz,W. (1951) New birds from India. J. Zool. Soc. India 3: 27-30.
Koelz, W. (1952) New races of Indian birds. J. Zool. Soc. India 4:
37-46.
NRSA (1983) Mapping of forest cover in India from satellite imagery:
1972-75 and 1980-82. Summary report: North Eastern
States/Union Territories. Hyderabad, India: National Remote
Sensing Agency.
Ripley, S. D. (1952) A collection of birds from the Naga Hills. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 50: 475-514.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C.
(1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity
conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Stonor, C. R. (1947) Display of a male minivet. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 47: 383.
Amvaruddin Choudhury, Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate) , Baksa district. Correspondence: Rhino
Foundation, Guwahati 781 007, Assam, india. Email: badrul@sify.com
Surveys for Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
in and around Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal
HEM SAGAR BARAL
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus occurs in India,
Nepal, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, southern
China, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, peninsular
Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia (BirdLife
International 2001). Within this large range, most of
the population is now confined to the Indian subconti¬
nent (Choudhury 2000). The species is listed globally
as Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2004) and
nationally as threatened (Baral and Inskipp 2004)
because it has a small and declining population owing
to habitat loss and degradation, hunting and distur¬
bance (BirdLife International 2001).
Lesser Adjutant was previously common in
southern Nepal, but it is now mainly restricted to
isolated areas (BirdLife International 2001), such as
Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (Fleming et al. 1984,
Pokharel 1998). Although the reserve provides good
habitat for many waterbirds, annual counts indicate
that waterbird numbers are declining (Baral and
Inskipp 2004). Apart from studies in Royal Chitwan
National Park (Gyawali 2003a, b, Hungden and
Clarkson 2003, Tamang 2003, Choudhary 2004),
systematic surveys of the species have not been carried
out. I carried out such surveys in Koshi Tappu Wildlife
Reserve, focusing on population size, nesting and
habitat preferences.
STUDY AREA
Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (hereafter Koshi Tappu)
lies at 26'J38'N 87"00'E on the banks of Sapta-Koshi
River in Sunsari, Saptari and Udayapur districts of east
Nepal. The reserve is characterised by sandy and silty
soils with patches of scrub and mixed deciduous
riverine forest scattered on the high ground. The
vegetation consists primarily of Acacia catechu and
Dalbergia sisoo trees, with tall elephant grass Saccharum
spontaneum , 5. arundinacea and cattail Typha elephan-
tina. The reserve was gazetted in 1^)76 mainly to
conserve habitat for the remaining population of
buffalo Bubalus arnee. A total of 477 bird species has
been recorded here, of which 18 are globally threat¬
ened (Bird Conservation Nepal 2004a). In particular,
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
191
Figure 1. Map showing location of KoshiTappu Wildlife Reserve and the distribution of Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
in Nepal.
the reserve holds the largest population of Swamp
Francolin Francolinus gularis (Vulnerable) in Nepal
(Baral 1998, Dahal 2000, 2002). Koshi Tappu has
been designated as a Ramsar site and an Important
Bird Area (Baral and Inskipp 2001). Outside Koshi
Tappu, the study covered Morang, Sunsari, Saptari,
Udaypur and Siraha districts. These lie primarily in the
lowland terai, apart from Udaypur which lies mainly in
the hills. Agriculture is the major land use in these
districts (Central Bureau of Statistics 1998).
METHODS
Data were collected from September 2003 to February
2004. Observations were made in all potential habitats
of Lesser Adjutant; such areas were located by
questioning knowledgeable local people. Nest searches
were conducted during the breeding season
(September to December). Care was taken not to
disturb the birds, although many were close to human
settlements and even highways. A nest was counted as
active or apparently occupied if young were seen in the
nest or at least one adult was on the nest (Bibby et al.
1992). Because the species is large and conspicuous,
and colonies are relatively small, we were able to carry
out direct counts of all individuals. When individuals
were observed, the habitat they occupied was recorded
as one of three classes: agricultural fields (paddy,
wheat, and cereals), open wetlands and shallow
marshes.
RESULTS
The greatest concentration of feeding storks was found
between Lahan (Siraha district) and Inaruwa (Sunsari
district) with 26 individuals in February 2004. Koshi
Barrage and areas to the west were also good areas for
feeding birds. During September-December 2003, of
15 birds seen feeding, 60% were in paddyfields, and
40% were in shallow marshes.
In total, 61 nests were found at four colonies (Table
1). The largest colony was at Urlabari, Morang, with
31 occupied nests (including 14 in just one tree). All
nests were outside Koshi Tappu apart from those at
Kamalpur, which lies in the buffer zone. All nests were
found in karam Adina cordifolia (59%) or simal Bombax
ceiba (41%), with 2-14 per tree. In total, 108 chicks
(mainly old, nearly fledged individuals) were counted.
Assuming that all survived to fledging and that each
nest had a pair of adults tending, then the total popula¬
tion in the area was 231 individuals.
DISCUSSION
Population
The global population of this species is estimated to be
5,000 individuals (BirdLife International 2004). The
number we estimated in eastern Nepal (231 individu¬
als) thus represents almost 5% of the global
population. We noted that some colonies had disap¬
peared, presumably as a consequence of disturbance.
No nests were found at Prakashpur, Sunsari district
(one nest noted in 2001: personal observations),
Tarahara, Sunsari district (six active nests in
1982-1983: BirdLife International 2001), and
Mahadevpatti, Saptari district (eight nests in
2001-2002: personal observations). We found that
Lesser Adjutants have declined in and around Koshi
Table 1. Colonies of Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus found
near Koshi Tappu.
192
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Tappu reserve. Only two birds were noted inside the
reserve, with a further six seen in adjacent agricultural
land. By contrast, Pokharel (1998) recorded 65
individuals in and immediately adjacent to the reserve
during 1994-1995. In central and western Nepal, a
combination of recently published counts and personal
observations suggests a total breeding population of
about 50 pairs (Table 2). Adding this to the total for
east Nepal gives a national total of c.220 breeding
individuals. This estimate falls within the range of
100-500 estimated for the country (H. S. Baral 1998
in litt. to BirdLife International 2001). Adding non¬
breeding birds and fledglings gives a population in the
upper end of this range. This makes Nepal the second
most important country for the species after India
(Choudhury 2000).
The most important finding of this study is that all
the nests found were outside protected areas. Even if
we assume that all the nests in central and western
Nepal lie within protected areas, the majority of the
country’s Lesser Adjutant population nest outside
protected areas. This new information is alarming as it
was previously thought that protected areas held the
majority of the population. Birds may be safer nesting
inside a protected area, but for feeding they prefer
open fields, rice fields, and shallow marshes which are
mostly outside protected areas.
Conservation
Lesser Adjutant is impacted by several threats, prima¬
rily habitat loss, disturbance and hunting (Shakya
1995, Giri 1997, Pokharel 1998, Petersson 1998,
Gyawali 2003a, b, BirdLife International 2001).
Feeding habitat is being converted to agriculture and
infrastructural development. Current changes in
agricultural practice may adversely affect adjutants.
Farmers have switched to cash crops such as vegetables
and fruit from traditionally grown crops such as paddy
and wheat. Since paddyfields are apparently important
feeding habitats for adjutants, these changes may have
serious consequences. Further studies should investi¬
gate how dependent the birds are on paddyfields.
Nesting colonies are often close to human settle¬
ments, and many have been destroyed as villages and
towns have expanded. The colony at Urlabari is threat¬
ened by planned construction. Even in protected areas
such as Chitwan, loss of nest trees and lopping of
branches on nest trees to feed domesticated elephants
is a threat.
Agrochemicals pose a further threat (Pokharel
1998, Gyawali 2003b). In many villages there is a
practice of killing fish by poisoning the entire water
system (Dahal 1999, personal observations). Such
practices severely damage the local ecosystem and have
impacts on species higher up the food chain, including
Lesser Adjutant. As adjutants are large and conspicu¬
ous, they are easy targets for hunters. Bird parts,
mainly the bills, are sold in shops in Kathmandu as
medicine (Sapkota 2002).
Although efforts are underway to raise public
awareness, mainly initiated by Bird Conservation
Nepal, there is still widespread lack of knowledge
about the value of birds. Many local people do not
know that the Lesser Adjutant is globally threatened.
Despite the fact that Nepal holds a significant
proportion of the world population, little has been
done for its protection. The species has been recom¬
mended for inclusion on the protected species list of
the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 1973
(Bird Conservation Nepal 2004b). Lesser Adjutant
uses agricultural habitats and often nests close to
villages ( contra Soothill and Soothill 1989), so it cannot
simply be conserved by declaring protected areas.
Local community-based approaches for conservation
are therefore needed. Strong governmental commit¬
ment combined with the mobilisation of civil society is
vital for this.
We recommend that: (a) periodic nationwide
surveys should be carried out, preferably in coordina¬
tion with surveys in India; (b) the species should be
listed as protected under the National Parks and
Wildlife Conservation Act and there should be total
ban on hunting; (c) further research should be carried
out on the dependence of the species on paddyfields,
with a view to advising farmers on best practice; and
(d) nesting locations should be protected and
monitored with increased community participation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
For assistance in the field I would like to thank Bheshraj Ghimire,
Dinesh Giri, Som GC, Badri Chaudhary, Ben Vickers, Raj Kumar
Rai and Krishna Bindari. I would especially like to thank the
Oriental Bird Club for generous financial support. I would like to
drank D. B. Choudhary for providing me with information. I am
grateful to Carol Inskipp, Suchit Basnet and Eben Goodale for their
valuable comments and suggestions. I would like to thank Koshi
Camp and Churia Forest Development Project»for hospitality and
support at Koshi and Sagarmatha zones respectively.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
193
REFERENCES
Baral, H. S. (1998) Status, distribution and habitat preferences of
Swamp Francolin Francolinus gularis in Nepal. Ibisbill 1: 35-70.
Baral, H. S. and Inskipp, C. (2001) Important bird areas in Nepal: a
report to the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, U.K.
Kathmandu: Bird Conservation Nepal.
Baral, H. S. and Inskipp, C. (2004) The State of Nepal’s birds 2004.
Kathmandu: Department of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation, Bird Conservation Nepal and IUCN Nepal.
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D. and Hill, D. A. (1992) Bird census
techniques. London: Academic Press.
Bird Conservation Nepal (2004a) Birds of Nepal: an official checklist.
Kathmandu: Department of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation and Bird Conservation Nepal.
Bird Conservation Nepal (2004b) Recommended bird species for
the inclusion on the revised protected bird list: a report to His
Majesty’s Government of Nepal. Second draft. Kathmandu:
Bird Conservation Nepal.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Central Bureau of Statistics (1998) Statistical pocket book, Nepal.
Kathmandu: His Majesty’s Government National Planning
Commission.
Choudhary, D. B. (2004) Notable bird records fromTigerTops area.
Royal Chitwan National Park. Unpublished report.
Choudhury, A. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati, India: Gibbon
Books and WWF-India.
Dahal, B. R. (2000) Status and conservation of Swamp francolin
Francolinus gularis in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a
preliminary study. Pp. 134-137 in M. Woodburn and P.
McGowan, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd International Galliformes
Symposium. Kathmandu and Royal Chitwan National Park 24th
September-lst October, 2000.
Dahal, B. R. (2002) Swamp Francolin Francolinus gularis : its future
at Koshi. Danphe 1 1(3): 3-4.
Dahal, M. (1999) Poisoning in Dhungre River, Royal Chitwan
National Park. Danphe 8(1): 3.
Fleming, R. L. Sr., Fleming, R. L. Jr. and Bangdel, L. S. (1984) Birds
of Nepal. Third edition. Kathmandu: Nature Himalayas.
Giri,T. (1997) Habitat loss at Koshi. Danphe 6(2): 1.
Gyawali, N. (2003a) Population and habitat preferences of Lesser
Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus in Royal Chitwan National Park,
central Nepal. Danphe 12(3/4): 8.
Gyawali, N. (2003b) Population status and habitat preference of
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus in Royal Chitwan National
Park, mid-lowland Nepal. Unpublished report submitted to
Oriental Bird Club, U.K.
Hungden, K. and Clarkson, C. (2003) Field observations on the
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus at Chitwan. Danphe
12(3/4): 7-8.
Petersson, D. (1998) What is happening at Koshi Tappu Wildlife
Reserve? Danphe 7(1/2): 6-7.
Pokharel, P. (1998) Food items and feeding behavior of the Lesser
Adjutant Stork, Leptoptilos javanicus in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife
Reserve. Ibisbill 1: 71-86.
Sapkota, D. 2002. Protected birds of Nepal: are they really
protected? Danphe 1 1(1): 33-35.
Shakya, S. (1995) Bird massacre in Nepal. Bird Conservation Nepal
Bull. 4(3): 5.
Soothill, E. and Soothill, R. (1989) Wading birds of the world. London:
Blandford Press.
Tamang, K. R. (2003) Notes on the breeding of Lesser Adjutant
Leptoptilos javanicus in Chitwan. Danphe 12(3/4): 9.
Hem S agar Baral, Koshi Camp, BO. Box 21016, Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal. Email: birdlife@mos.com.np
Black-chinned Fruit-dove Ptilinopus leclancheri
and Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma on Taiwan
WAYNE W. HSU and N. J. COLLAR
In reviewing the taxonomy of certain Asian bird
species, Collar (2004a, b) drew attention to two
enigmas in the Taiwan avifauna, unaware that recent
photographic and specimen evidence could shed a
little more light on the issues. In one case, the paucity
of records and specimens of Black-chinned Fruit-dove
Ptilinopus leclancheri made it difficult to assess the
existence and taxonomic status of the island’s reputed
population; in the other, the slender evidence that the
Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma breeds on Taiwan had
never resulted in a satisfactory subspecific attribution,
a circumstance which had led some publications to
assume that no such population exists.
Black-chinned Fruit-dove
Black-chinned Fruit-dove was first found on Taiwan on
1 November 1 922, when a male was captured in Tainan
County (Hachisuka and Udagawa 1951, Wang et al.
1991, Lin 1997). Hachisuka and Udagawa (1951) gave
the precise locality as ‘Kijinsho’, although we romanise
its name as ‘Gwayren’, and they mentioned two other
specimens, one from ‘Koshun (Hengchun)’ — indicating
that this is in the ‘extreme south of the island’ — without
date, and one, a juvenile, from ‘Botel Tobago’ (i.e. Lanyu
Island) in or before 1934. Forty years later, Ripley
(1962) established the island’s population as an
endemic subspecies taiwanus, using a single specimen
taken at Kenting on 19 July 1961; he also reported the
1922 specimen as immature, but this is not in
Hachisuka and Udagawa (1951).
After another forty years the situation has by no
means clarified. Baptista et al. (1997) did not recognise
the subspecies, and only mentioned the species for
‘Lan Hsu’ (Lanyu), attributing the population there to
the race longialis of the islands off the north of Luzon,
although Dickinson et al. (1991) called longialis
endemic to the Philippines. Gibbs et al. (2001),
however, accepted the race taiwanus , and listed four
localities, Tainan, Hsien, Hengchan and Lanyu. Of
these ‘Hsien’ may merely be a transcription of ‘county’
194
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
(the comma between Tainan and Hsien is thus
probably a slip, or the repeat of a slip), while
'Hengchan' is evidently Hengchun, the peninsula
where Renting is located, in Pingtung County; so they
simply seem to be repeating the information in
Hachisuka and Udagawa (1951). In any case, both
these recent English-language sources overlooked
Wang et al. (1991), who listed three apparently differ¬
ent sites, which we romanise as Chishan in Kaohsiung
County, and Laiyi and Renting, both in Pingtung
County. Gibbs et al. (2001) reported that the evident
rarity of the species in Taiwan had led Chang (1980) —
despite Ripley’s establishment of an endemic race (and
despite the Lanyu specimen being juvenile) — to specu¬
late if it might not be a vagrant from the northern
Philippines. In fact, Ripley himself referred to this
notion, so it was evidently in circulation before 1962.
Both Wang et al. (1991) and Lin (1997) adopted the
idea and treated the species as a vagrant. Owing to the
lack of sightings in the years 1990-1994 it was
removed from the most recent official list of Taiwan
birds (CWBF 1995; also http://www.bird.org.tw/
tw/birdall.htm). Presumably this explains why it is not
Plate 1 . Male Black-chinned Fruit-dove Ptilinopus leclancheri ,
Hsinhua, Tainan County, Taiwan, 16 October 2003. Photo:
Chien-Yuan Chen.
Plate 3. Juvenile Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma, Hui-Sun
Forest, Nantou County, Taiwan, 29 July 2002. Photo: Tze-
Hoi Kwan.
treated as either a protected species (TESRI 1996) or
a threatened species (Fang 2004) on Taiwan.
However, searches of various websites reveal several
recent, excellent-quality photographs of birds from
different parts of the main island, and indicate that the
species seems likely to be a rare resident, found mainly
in the south but with evidence also from Ilan in the
north-east. The website source (=ws) records we have
traced, sometimes supplemented by information from
the observers, concern five localities, and are as
follows: (1) Tou Cheng Elementary School, Ilan
County, 29 September-8 October 2003 (wsl and 2,
also Lai 2004; Plate 2); (2) Ilan City, where a bird
collided with a house window, 30 December 2002, and
was subsequently released (ws3, F. T. Lin in litt. 2005);
(3) Hsinhua, Tainan County, 16 October 2003 (ws4;
Plate 1); (4) Nan Ning Senior High School, Tainan
City, on 25 February 2004, involving a bird that died
after colliding with a window and is preserved at the
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute (TESRI,
catalogue number 2979) (ws5); and (5) Renting
National Park, Pingtung County, 13 March 2002
(ws6); same locality, 31 January 2004 (ws7; observer
Plate 2. Female Black-chinned Fruit-dove Ptilinopus
leclancheri , Tou Cheng Elementary School, Ilan County,
Taiwan, 3 October 2003. Photo: Yun-Hsien Lai.
Plate 4. Juvenile Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma (same
individual as in Plate 3), Hui-Sun Forest, Nantou County,
Taiwan, 29 July 2002. Photo: Tze-Hoi Kwan.
Forktail 21 (2005)
SHORT NOTES
195
Lee in litt. 2005); same locality, 28 January 2005 (ws8;
observer Lee in litt. 2005).
In addition, the Wild Bird Federation Taiwan
(WBFT) has the following records in its database:
three, Lanyu, 29 March 1997 (observer Chen); one,
Ren Shan Botanical Garden (Renshan Nursery
Garden), Ilan Country, 30 September 2001 (observer
Fan) and 28 September 2002 (Y.-H. Lai in litt. 2005);
two,Wuwei Harbor Waterbird Refuge, Ilan County, 31
December 2002 (F.-T. Lin). Moreover, Chin-Chung
Sa (in litt. 2005) has given us the following records:
one, Kenting, Pingtung County, 15 February 1980
(observer unknown); one, Longluantan (in Kenting
National Park), Pingtung County, 31 December 1986
(observer unknown); one, Inda Ecological Farm,
Pingtung County, 1 November 2000 (observer
Chang). Thus, conflating the older literature with these
recent records, the months in which the species has
been recorded for the island include January, February,
March, July, September, October, November and
December, and there is at least one record of a
juvenile; this evidence does not suggest vagrancy from
the Philippines.
Despite the quality of most of the photographs, it is
impossible to use them to validate Ripley’s subspecies
taiwanus, whose characters, as given by Gibbs et al.
(2001), were repeated by Collar (2004b). However, we
can make the following comments. The first is that
Ripley made his diagnosis from a single bird, clearly
not a particularly safe basis for a taxonomic judge¬
ment. Indeed, the specimen was one in which bluish
‘splotching’ on the upperparts was speculated to be an
‘individual aberration’, which presumably means that
any other of its unusual features could also be consid¬
ered as such. Ripley’s bird matched the northern
Philippine race longialis in wing and tail measurements,
but had a larger bill and longer tarsus, and was rather
darker green above and much darker green below, with
a ‘large and not so dark’ breast-spot and ‘anterior
portion of the chin spot’. However, to us the bill of
Taiwan birds in the various website photographs does
not obviously appear ‘much more massive’. Moreover,
Ripley curiously quoted a letter from Y. Yamashina,
who had seen three Taiwan specimens (including the
1922 bird; the two others were lost in 1945), and who
for two of them gave tail, culmen and tarsus measure¬
ments which essentially fall within or at the bounds of
measurements given for longialis and/or nominate
leclancheri. Although Yamashina concluded with the
point that in colour Taiwanese and Philippine birds
were ‘quite different’, we feel that the case for the legit¬
imacy of taiwanus is at present by no means clear, and
needs new validation.
Scaly Thrush
The question of the status of the Scaly (or White’s)
Thrush ( sensu lato ) on Taiwan has also long been
problematic. Mees (1977) concluded that there were
two forms on the island, the long-winged winter-
visiting race aurea and a short-winged presumed
resident without a taxonomic allocation. Mees’s
evidence for the latter was, however, just two speci¬
mens and he found it impossible to attribute them to
subspecies, although several publications which
accepted the existence of this resident form (Kobayashi
and Cho 1981, Chang 1985, Wang et al. 1991) contin¬
ued to refer to it mistakenly as horsfieldi (horsfieldi
applies to Indonesian populations only: Collar 2004a).
Severinghaus and Blackshaw (1976) did not mention
subspecific names, but they too referred to the Scaly
Thrush as both a winter visitor and a rare resident.
Nevertheless, Clement (2000) attributed all birds
found on the island to aurea, and again the species was
omitted from the recent Red Data Book (Fang 2004).
Recently two photographs of a juvenile bird have
been published on a website, indicating that the species
must indeed breed in Taiwan. These were taken at Hui-
Sun Forest, Nantou County, on 29 July 2002, by a
Hong Kong birder, Tze-Hoi Kwan, during a tour being
guided by Wen-Horn Lin (ws9-10, Plates 3-4). In both
images it is possible to see the gape-flanges of a young,
recently fledged bird, and this status is further
suggested by its lanky, small-headed, thin-necked,
loose-winged and altogether slightly dishevelled
appearance. It is, of course, impossible to comment on
the bird’s subspecific identity, but it must presumably
represent the short-winged resident form that Mees
(1977) determined to be present on the island.
Moreover, a specimen of a newly fledged Scaly Thrush
was recently acquired by TESRI: this was sent to the
institute on 19 June 2001 from Sitou, also in Nantou
County, and bears the number 396 (Cheng-Te Yao in
litt. 2005). Hui-Sun and Sitou are respectively north
and south of Sun Moon Lake, at opposite ends of
Nantou County, but these records still tend to suggest
that the mountains of central Taiwan embraced by this
county are the first place to begin looking systemati¬
cally for breeding Scaly Thrushes on the island.
Both this and Black-chinned Fruit-dove are
presumably all-year residents, and we imagine that
they might qualify for treatment as threatened species
on Taiwan, given their probably low population sizes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are most grateful to the following for their help with this contri¬
bution: Des Allen, who pointed out to NJC the existence of the
photographs referred to in this article, and who put us in touch;
Woei-Horng Fang, who kindly provided records from the Wild Bird
Federation Taiwan database; Chin-Chung Sa, who kindly did
likewise from his own records and notes; Chien-Yuan Chen,Yun-
Hsien Lai and Tze-Hoi Kwan for permission to reproduce their
photographs; Cheng-Te Yao at TESRI, who sent information on
specimens held there; Fang-Tse Lin and Wen-Horn Lin, who
provided much helpful information; and Robert Prys-Jones at the
Natural History Museum, U.K., who kindly faxed pages of various
papers.
REFERENCES
Baptista, L. F., Trail, P. W. and Horblit, H. M. (1997) Family
Columbidae (pigeons and doves). Pp. 60-243 in J. del Hoyo, A.
Elliott, and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world , 4.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Chang, J. W.-F. (1980) A field guide to the birds of Taiwan. Taichung:
Tunghai University.
Clement, P. (2000) Thrushes. London: Christopher Helm (A. and C.
Black).
Collar, N. J. (2004a) Species limits in some Indonesian thrushes.
Forktail 20: 71-87.
196
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 21 (2005)
Collar, N. J. (2004b) Subspecies ofTaiwan birds — first impressions.
BirdingASIA 2: 34-52.
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines: an annotated check-list. Tring, UK: British
Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list 12).
Fang, W.-H. (2004) Threaten [s/c] birds ofTaiwan. Taipei: Wild Bird
Federation Taiwan. (In Chinese.)
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E. and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves.
Robertsbridge, East Sussex, UK: Pica Press.
Hachisuka, M. and Udagawa, T. (1951) Contribution to the
ornithology of Formosa, part 2. Quart. J. Taiwan Mus. 4(1/2):
1-180.
Kobayashi, K. and Cho, H. (1981) Birds ofTaiwan. Japan: Maeda
Graphic Arts. (In Japanese.)
Lai, Y.-H. (2004) [Rare bird sightings: Black-chinned Fruit-dove
(female).] [Chinese Flight Feathers] 17(7) insider front cover. (In
Chinese.)
Lin, W.-H. (1997) [History ofTaiwan ornithological discoveries.] Taipei:
Yushan Publishing. (In Chinese.)
Website sources
1 : http://www.wbst. org.tw/exchange/communication/showtopic.asp?c=listandserialno=03 10250002
2: http://www.wbst.org.tw/exchange/communication/showtopic.asp?c=listandserialno=03 1 0 170005
3: http://wildbird. e-land. gov. tw/wildbird/newwildbird/Guide/bird/birddetail.asp?B_ID=3506
4: http://nature.kl. edu.tw/showthread.php?threadid=4248
5: http://nature.kl. edu.tw/showthread.php?threadid=8020
6: http://www.wbst. org.tw/exchange/communication/showtopic.asp?c=listandserialno=0204 120004
7: http://nature.kl. edu.tw/showthread.php?s=andthreadid= 12337
8: http://nature.kl.edu.tw/showthread.php?s=andthreadid=19525
9: http://www.wbst. org.tw/exchange/communication/showtopic.asp?c=listandserialno=0208 170002
10: http://www.wbst. org.tw/exchange/communication/showtopic.asp?c=listandserialno=0208 170003
Mees, G. F. (1977) Additional records of birds from Formosa
(Taiwan). Zool. Meded. 51: 243-264.
Ripley, S. D. (1962) A new subspecies of Black-chinned Fruit-dove.
Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 75: 315-316.
Severinghaus, S. R. and Blackshaw, K. T. (1976) A new guide to the
birds of Taiwan. Taipei: MeiYa Publications, Inc.
TESRI (=Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute) (1996)
[Guide to protected wildlife.] Nantou: Taiwan Endemic Species
Research Institute. (In Chinese.)
Wang, C.-H., Wu, S.-H., Huang, G.-Y., Yang, H.-Y., Tsai, C.-H.,
Tsai, M.-C. and Hsiao, C.-L. (1991) [A field guide to the birds of
Taiwan.] Taichung: Taiwan Wild Bird Information Center, and
Tokyo: Wild Bird Society of Japan. (In Chinese.)
WBFT (=Wild Bird Federation Taiwan, formerly Wild Bird Society
of ROC) (1995) [Checklist of birds of Taiwan.] [Chinese Flight
Feathers] 8(6): 22-41. (In Chinese.)
Wayne W. Hsu, #8 Lane 70,Yangte Blvd Sec. 2, Taipei, 111 Taiwan. Email: waynehsu@birdlover.com
N. J. Collar, Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge
CB2 3EJ, and BirdLife Inter national, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U.K. Email:
nigel.collar@birdlife.org
Forktail 21
2005
Forktail publishes original papers in the English language (also,
in certain cases, English translations of papers in Oriental lan¬
guages) treating any aspect of the ornithology (e.g. distribution,
biology, conservation, identification) of the region bounded by
the Indus River to the west, the Russian Far East, Korean
Peninsula, Japan, and Lydekker’s Line (i.e. the eastern bound¬
ary ofWallacea) to the east, the Chagos Archipelago, Lesser
Sundas, Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands to the
south (see map in Oriental Bird Club Bull. 31:7). Submissions
are considered on the understanding that they are being offered
solely for publication by the Oriental Bird Club, which will
retain copyright. All submissions are reviewed by referees and
the Forktail Editorial Committee, and those accepted are nor¬
mally published in order of receipt. (Some further indication of
the type of material appropriate for the journal is provided in
the inaugural editorial, ‘The scope of Forktail, Forktail 1: 3-5.)
Submissions should be sent electronically as an email
attachment to mail@orientalbirddub.org. If this is not possible,
manuscripts may be sent on disk, preferably in PC format, to
the Senior Editor, Forktail, OBC, P.O. Box 324, Bedford,
MK42 OWG, U.K. In both cases, the text, tables, figure legends
and appendices should be combined as a single Word file.
Figures (maps, diagrams, images etc.) should be sent as high-
resolution scans in standard file formats (JPEG, TIFF etc.) or,
if this is not possible, originals may be posted to the above
address. Maps should be marked with a scale and north arrow.
The approximate position of figures and tables should be indi¬
cated in the margin of the typescript. Papers should be concise
and factual, take full account of previous relevant literature but
avoid repetition of established information as much as possible;
opinions expressed should be based on adequate evidence.
Titles of papers must be accurate and concise, and (for the ben¬
efit of abstraction services) include any relevant scientific (taxo¬
nomic) name.
Whenever possible, authors should consult an issue of
Forktail for style and layout. Spelling follows Tlte shorter Oxford
English dictionary, except that external features of birds are spelt
and hyphenated in accordance with the entry under
‘Topography’ in A dictionary of birds (1985). Spelling of place-
names accords (unless another source is specified) with the
most recent edition (currently tenth, 1999) of The Times atlas of
the world ; we use ‘South-East Asia’ and ‘Vietnam’. Localities
with well-known other spellings or older names should have
these placed in parentheses after their first mention. For locali¬
ties too small to be in the Times atlas a source of the spelling
adopted should preferably be indicated and the precise geo¬
graphical coordinates provided (these should be doublechecked
where possible). It is appreciated that authors will not always
have access to the above sources; in such cases the editor will
seek to introduce conformity.
English and scientific names of birds should follow those
provided by Inskipp,T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996)
An annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. On first
mention of a bird both English and scientific name should be
given, thereafter only one, preferably the English. Scientific tri-
nominals need be used only if subspecific nomenclature is rele¬
vant to the topic under discussion. These recommendations also
apply for any other animal or plant species mentioned.
Italics are used for all words of foreign languages, including
generic and specific scientific names. Metric units and their
international symbols should be used; if it is necessary to cite
other systems of measurement, these can be added in parenthe¬
ses. Temperatures should be given in the Centigrade (Celsius)
scale. Numbers one to ten are written in full except when linked
with a measurement abbreviation or higher number, thus ‘five
birds’ but ‘5 km’ and ‘5-12 birds’; numerals are used for all
numbers above ten, four-figure numbers and above using the
comma thus: ‘1,234’, ‘12,345’. Single quotation marks are to be
used. Details of experimental technique, extensive tabulations
of results, etc., are best presented as appendices.
Authors of papers containing statistical analysis should
observe the provisions of the relevant section of ‘Notice to con¬
tributors’ in a recent Ibis. Dates should be written 1 January
1985, times of day as 08h30, 17h55 (24-hour clock), etc. When
citing a conversation (‘verbally’) or letter (fin litt.’ ), the contact’s
name and initials should be included, preferably with the year of
communication. A full-length paper must include a summary
not exceeding 5% of the total length. Authors of papers are
encouraged to offer their work to one or more ornithologist or
biologist for critical assessment prior to submission to Forktail.
Such help as is received should naturally be mentioned in an
acknowledgement section before the full references are present¬
ed.
References in the text should follow the form ‘(Campbell
and Lack 1985)’ and ‘King et al. (1975) suggest...’. More than
one within the same parentheses should be chronologically list¬
ed, alphabetically if of the same year. Publications by the same
authors in the same year may be distinguished by ‘a’, ‘b’, etc.,
after the date. Full references must be listed alphabetically at the
end in the form:
Campbell, B. and Lack, E. eds. (1985) A dictionary of birds.
Calton, Staffordshire, U.K.:T. and A. D. Poyser.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) A
field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Kuroda, Nh., ed. (1984) Ketteiban seibutsu daizukan; chorui
[. Illustrations of animals and plants: birds]. Tokyo: Sekai
Bunkasha. (In Japanese.)
Rosljakov, G. E. (1985) [‘Information on the distribution and
numbers of Aix galericulata and Mergus squamatus over
Chabarovsk Territory.’] Pp. 101-102 in N. M. Litvinenko,
ed. Rare and endangered birds of the Far East. Vladivostok: Far
East Science Center, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. (In
Russian.)
Sien Yao-hua, Kuan Kuan-Hsiin and Zheng Zuo-xin (1964)
[‘An avifaunal survey of the Chinghai province.’] Acta Zool.
Sinica 16: 690-709. (In Chinese.)
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Borneo. Third edition. Kota
Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur: The Sabah Society and the
Malayan Nature Society.
Somadikarta, S. (1986) Collocalia linchi Horsfield & Moore - a
revision. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 106: 32-40.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds ofWallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia):
an annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’
Union (Check-list no. 7).
It will be noted from these examples that references to non-
Roman scripts need to be transliterated and/or translated (or
even, with more recondite sources, both); either the transliterat¬
ed title may be left as it is, or a translation of it can be substitut¬
ed in square brackets (but where an abstract provides its own
English title, this may be cited in inverted commas within
square brackets), and the language involved should follow the
reference, in parentheses.
The author’s name, postal address and email address should
appear in italics at the end of the article.
Authors will receive proofs for checking, which they are
required to return within one week of receipt. All joint commu¬
nications must indicate the name and email address of the
author to whom proofs should be sent. Textual changes in proof
cannot normally be countenanced. Pdfs of the published pages
are available to authors on request.
No. 22 August 2006
FORKTAiL
Journal of Asian Ornithology
T*€MATURAL »
NtSTORV mjSBM |
j' 2 1 sue 200s !
j TFa^Gubwrr
Forktail 22
2006
OBC Council
Phil Benstead
Stephen Browne (Chairman, Conservation Committee)
Nigel Collar (Chairman, Publications Committee)
Mike Edgecombe (Promotions)
Tim Loseby (Art and Photographic Editor)
Steve Rowland (Chairman)
Tony Sawbridge
Graeme Spinks (Treasurer)
Bnan Sykes (Acting Secretary)
Margaret Sykes (Membership Secretary)
Richard Thomas (Advertising)
Alan Wilkinson (Internet)
Publications Committee
Tim Allwood, Stuart Butchart (Senior Editor, Forktail),
Nigel Collar, Adrian Long, Tim Loseby, Rene Pop, Nigel Redman,
Brian Sykes, Richard Thomas
Conservation Committee
Stephen Browne, Dave Buckingham, Mike Crosby, Geoff Hilton,
Carol Inskipp, Jon Riley, Jim Wardill, Simon Wotton
The Oriental Bird Club has been established for ornithologists
throughout the world, both amateur and professional, who share
a common interest in the region’s birds and wish to assist in
their conservation.
The Club aims to:
• Promote interest in the birds of the Oriental Region and
their conservation
• Liaise with, and promote the work of, existing regional
organisations
• Collate and publish material on Oriental birds
OBC Representatives
Susan Myers (Australia)
Paul Thompson (Bangladesh)
Filip Verbelen (Belgium)
Keo Omaliss (Cambodia)
Tony Gaston (Canada)
Ding Chang-qing (China)
Jiri Mlikovsky (Czech Republic)
Torben Lund (Denmark)
Hannu Jannes (Finland)
Jean-Claude Porchier (France)
Axel Braunlich (Austria and Germany)
C.Y. Lam and Richard Lewthwaite (Hong Kong)
Asad Rahmani and Vishnu Singh (India)
Ria Saryanthi (Indonesia)
Chris Murphy (Ireland)
Carlo Violani (Italy)
Akira Hibi (Japan)
Jin- Young Park (Korea)
Mike Chong and Ooi Chin Hock (Malaysia)
Charles Anderson (Maldives)
Dr Tony Htin Hla (Myanmar [Burma])
Bird Conservation Nepal (Nepal)
Jelle Scharringa and Bas van Balen (Netherlands)
Jan Ove Gjershaug (Norway)
Ashiq Ahmad Khan and Aleem Ahmed Khan (Pakistan)
Carmela Espanola and Ame Jensen (Philippines)
Ray Tipper (Portugal)
Fang Woei-horng (Taiwan)
Lim Kim Seng (Singapore)
Adam Riley (South Africa)
Sarath Kotagama and Upali Ekanayake (Sri Lanka)
Per Alstrom (Sweden)
Beat Wartmann (Switzerland)
Philip Round (Thailand)
Robert Kennedy (USA)
Jonathan Eames and Nguyen Cu (Vietnam)
Membership of OBC
Ordinary Member £15 p.a.
Family Member £20 p.a.
Reduced Rate Member £10 p.a.
For Oriental nationals resident in the region.
We encourage all members to pay the full
rate if they can afford it
Supporting Member £25 p.a.
Funding one Oriental member in addition
to Ordinary membership
Libraries and Academic Institutions £25 p.a.
Business Supporter £45 p.a.
The Oriental Bird Club is a Registered Charity No. 297242
For further information please write to:
Oriental Bird Club, P.O. Box 324, Bedford MK42 OWG, U.K.
OBC Email address OBC Web Site
mail@orientalbirdclub.org http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/
The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of Oriental Bird Club concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Cover picture: White-browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana males
(upper two birds) and female (lower bird).
Painting by John Anderton.
ISSN 0950-1746
© Oriental Bird Club 2006
FORKTAIL
Number 22, 2006
Senior Editor: Stuart Butchart
Assistant Editors: Suhel Quader and Andrew Radford
CONTENTS
STUART BUTCHART
Editorial . iii
JACK H. COX
Breeding behaviour and nesting ecology of White-browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana in Nepal . 1
MOCHAMAD INDRAWAN, SOEKARJA SOMADIKARTA, JATNA SUPRIATNA,
MURRAY D. BRUCE, SUNARTO and GURITNO DJANUBUDIMAN
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia . 7
LEE KWOK SHING, MICHAEL WAI-NENG LAU, JOHN R. FELLOWES
and CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status . 23
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Significant bird records and local extinctions in Puma and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries,
Gujarat, India . 39
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
Incidental wetland bird observations from Attapu and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR,
March-June 2005 . 49
D. ALLEN, C. ESPANOLA, G. BROAD, C. OLIVEROS and J. C. T. GONZALEZ
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines, including two first records for the Philippines . 57
FRANCESCO GERMI and DONO WALUYO
Additional information on the autumn migration of raptors in east Bali, Indonesia . 71
DESMOND ALLEN
New records and other observations of birds on the island of Tablas, Romblon province, Philippines . 77
N. J. COLLAR
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae) . 85
Short Notes
BEN KING and JULIAN P. DONAHUE
The rediscovery and song of the Rusty-throated Wren Babbler Spelaeomis badeigularis . 113
ANDREW J. PIERCE and PHILIP D. ROUND
Everett’s White-eye Zosterops everetti in KhaoYai, north-east Thailand . 116
ALEEM AHMED KHAN and MIKIO TAKASHI
Notes on Amami Thrush, Zoothera ( dauma ) major on Amami Oshima, Ryukyu Islands, Japan . 117
ROBERT HUTCHINSON and ANDY MEARS
Extension of the breeding range of Blue-winged Pitta Pina moluccensis in peninsular Malaysia . 119
ROBERT HUTCHINSON, JAMES EATON and PHIL BENSTEAD
Observations of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios in Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve, North Sulawesi,
Indonesia, with a description of a secondary vocalisation . 120
AMILA SALGADO
Some observations on the diet of Red-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus in Sri Lanka . 122
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Instances of successful raising of three chicks by Sarus Crane Grus antigone pairs . 124
?H£ NATURAL
HISTORY MUS&M
2 1 A!J(5
PURCHASED |
JOHN D. PILGRIM and ANDREW J. PIERCE
Some significant bird records from the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, including the first recent
record of Silver Oriole Oriolus mellianus . 125
S. SIVAKUMAR, JEEJO VARGHESE and VIBHU PRAKASH
Abundance of birds in different habitats in Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India . 128
HILALUDDIN, AISHA SULTANA, AFIFULLAH KHAN, H. S. A. YAHYA and RAHUL KAUL
Nesting ecology of Cattle Egrets and Little Egrets in Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India . 133
PAUL I. HOLT
First record of Wire-tailed Swallow Hirundo smithii for China, with notes on Alexandrine Parakeet
Psittacula eupatria and Rose-ringed Parakeet P. krameri . 137
PHILIP D. ROUND
Cooperative provisioning of nestlings in the White-crested Laughingthrush Garndax leucolophus . 138
PETER S. LANSLEY and ROBERT F. FARNES
Nesting of the Scarlet-breasted Fruit Dove Ptilinopus bemsteinii . 139
MARK B. ROBBINS, A. TOWNSEND PETERSON, ARPAD NYARI, GUOJUN CHEN
and TRISTAN J. DAVIS
Ornithological surveys of two reserves in Guangxi province, China, 2004-2005 . 140
J. W. DUCKWORTH
Six species of bird new to Laos . 147
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
Notable bird records from Mizoram in north-east India . 152
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
Plain-backed Thrush Zoothera mollissima : first record for Bangladesh . 155
ROBERT DECANDIDO, DEBORAH ALLEN and KEITH L. BILDSTEIN
Spring migration of Oriental Honey-buzzards and other raptors at Tanjung Tuan, Malaysia, 2000-2001 .. 156
ARUN P. SINGH
New and significant records from Dehra Dun valley and adjacent hills, lower Garhwal Himalayas, India:
May 2002-March 2006 . 160
G. GEWERS, E. CURIO and S. H. HEMBRA
First observation of an advertisement display flight of ‘Steere’s Honey-buzzard’ Pemis ( celebensis ) steerei
on Panay, Philippines . 163
FRANK R. LAMBERT, COLIN R. TRAINOR and ALMEIDA F. XAVIER
Observations of Wetar Ground Dove Gallicolumba hoedtii from Timor-Leste (East Timor) . 165
N. J. COLLAR
A taxonomic reappraisal of the Black-browed Barbet Megalaima oorti . 170
RAJEEV CHAUHAN AND HARRY ANDREWS
Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus and Sarus Crane Grus antigone depredating eggs of the
three-striped roofed turtle Kachuga dhongoka . 174
Guidelines for contributors
inside back cover
Forktail 22 (2006)
iii
Editorial
STUART BUTCHART
Forktail 22 is the fifth for which I have been Senior Editor,
and I would like to take this opportunity to thank the
many people who have kindly refereed papers over this
time. Referees voluntarily provide comments, often
detailed, and these frequently lead to substantial
improvements in papers. Many referees have reviewed
more than one paper per year for recent issues: for this
we are particularly grateful. Apologies for any omissions
from the following list, as some electronic files relating to
earlier issues have been lost through computer
malfunctions:
Des Allen, Per Alstrom, Paul Andrew, Bas van Balen,
Danny Balete, David Bishop, Axel Braunlich, Tim
O’Brien, Tom Brooks, Murray Bruce, Geoff Carey, David
Christie, Nigel Cleere, Peter Clement, Nigel Collar, Mike
Crosby, Pete Davidson, Rene Dekker, Edward Dickinson,
Raf Drijvers, Will Duckworth, Guy Dutson, Jonathan
Eames, Jon Ekstrom, John Fellowes, Juergen Fiebig,
Lincoln Fishpool, Jon Fjeldsa, Marc Foggin, Hilary Fry,
Peter Garson, T ony Gaston, David Gibbs, Eben Goodale,
Jon Hornbuckle, Jesper Hornskov, John Howes, Baz
Hughes, Carol Inskipp, Tim Inskipp, David James,
Mikhail Kalyakin, Krys Kazmierczak, Margaret Kinnaird,
James Kushlan, Frank Lambert, Richard Lewthwaite, Phil
McGowan, Aldrin Mallari, Stuart Marsden, Bernd
Meyburg, Hector Miranda, Dhananjai Mohan, Pete
Morris, Taej Mundkur, Meenakshi Nagendran, Rishad
Naoroji, Klaus Mailing Olsen, Storrs Olson, Stephen
Parry, Nicky Petkov, Jon Pilgrim, Stephen Piper, Aasheesh
Pittie, Colin Poole, Asad Rahmani, Pamela Rasmussen,
Bill Robichaud, Craig Robson, Kees Roselaar, Phil Round,
Roger Safford, Pratap Singh, Frank Steinheimer, Andy
Stoddart, Gopi Sundar, Paul Thompson, Joe Tobias,
T eresa T omek, Jack T ordoff, Colin T rainor, Yu Yat T ung,
Sudhir Vyas, Jim Wardill, David Wells, Gehan de Silva
Wijeyeratne, Martin Williams, Mike Wilson, Pete Wood
and Tim Woodward.
Readers may be interested to know that c.60% of
submissions to Forktail are accepted for publication. The
remainder are rejected usually because they are of
insufficient interest at a regional scale and are better aimed
at national journals, or because the results presented
contain inadequate detail, are insufficiently novel or
inappropriately analysed.
The time taken from submission to publication
depends primarily on how rapidly authors respond to
comments from reviewers and from the editor. The mean
duration is 12 months, but it is worth noting that 55% of
accepted submissions take less than 12 months. Papers
may be submitted and published within as little as two
months, but we recommend that authors submit papers
by March each year in order to stand a reasonable chance
of appearing in that year’s issue when it is published in
August. Well-written, logically structured manuscripts
that adhere to the Guidelines for contributors are likely to
be accepted most rapidly.
We are currently sourcing pdf files of previous issues
of Forktail , with the intention of making papers from all
issues more than two years old freely available over the
Oriental Bird Club website (www.orientalbirdclub.org).
We are also hoping to get Forktail included in the various
scientific abstracting services. The intention of both these
activities is to make the papers published in Forktail as
widely available as possible.
Stuart Butchart, Senior Editor, Forktail, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 ON A, U.K.
Email: stuart. butchart@birdlife. org
I
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 1-6
Breeding behaviour and nesting ecology of White-
browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana in Nepal
JACK H. COX
Opportunistic observations of White-browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana breeding clusters were made at two sites in Makalu-Barun
National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal on 7-1 1 May 2000 and 16-20 June 2002. Nesting birds gave distinctive displays that apparently
serve to distract potential predators from the nest. At least two (presumably subadult) males were observed breeding in a brown, female¬
like plumage. Nest structure varied: one was a large woven orb of bamboo leaves and moss containing a lined cup and lateral entrance;
two others had only a top entrance and were suspended in understorey vegetation, and a fourth was recessed in the mossy base of a shrub.
INTRODUCTION
White-browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana is widely
distributed in moist montane forests of southern Asia,
reportedly occurring from Simla (Himachal Pradesh) and
Garhwal (Uttaranchal) in India (Baker 1924 [but regarded
as questionable sight records, Roonwal and Nath 1 947]),
central Nepal (Grimmett etal. 1998), through the eastern
Himalayas to north-east India, Myanmar and the northern
regions of Thailand, Laos and Vietnam, plus south-east
Plate 1. White-browed Shortwing males (upper two birds) and female
(lower bird); see also cover.
Tibet and southern China to Taiwan and the Philippines
(Robson 2000) . To the south, there is a gap in distribution
as far as the Greater Sundas. On Borneo, the only records
of the species are from Mt Kinabalu and nearby peaks in
Sabah (Smythies 1986, Davison 1992) and the Mt Mulu
area of Sarawak (Harrison 1963). White-browed Shortwing
is also reported from Sumatra and Java (MacKinnon and
Phillipps 1993), with an isolated subspecies on Flores in
the Lesser Sundas (White and Bruce 1986, Robson 2000) .
In the Himalayas, subspecies B. m. cruralis is an
altitudinal migrant, wintering at lower temperate and
subtropical elevations down to 245 m (Inskipp and Inskipp
1991) and breeding in temperate forests up to 3,660 m
(Grimmett et al. 1998). At Paha Ivhola in east Nepal,
Martens and Eck (1995) found the species as late as June
limited to a zone of 2,400-2,700 m in mixed broadleaf
forests, mainly brown oak Quercus semecarpifolia and
Himalayan hemlock Tsuga dumosa. Males breed in two
plumages: blue and female-like brown (Plate 1 and cover).
The status of the species over much of its range is
difficult to assess because of the bird’s typically shy and
unobtrusive behaviour in dense undergrowth. Abundance
estimates in Nepal range from very common (Ali and
Ripley 1 997) to fairly common (Fleming et al. 1 984) and
very uncommon (Inskipp and Inskipp 1991, Grimmett
etal. 1998, 2000).
Knowledge of the breeding biology, ecology and
conservation requirements of this secretive species is
relatively sparse. Herein I report observations recorded
during two treks to Makalu-Barun National Park and
Buffer Zone (MBNP; MBBZ) in eastern Nepal.
RESULTS
While ascending the west bank of the Ishuwa river valley
in MBNP 7-12 May 2000, seven male and two female
White-browed Shortwings were encountered at 2,650-
3,170 m in pristine, temperate, mixed broadleaf forest,
comprising maple Acer spp., rhododendron Rhododendron
spp. and ningalo Drepanostachyum spp. and malingo
Yushania maling bamboos, with secondary elements of
hemlock, yew, magnolia and camellia (Table 1). Most
(n=6) of the birds were found at 2,790-2,940 m within
1.9 km of Dzo Kharka (= meadow) 27°38'N 87° 1 l'E.
A similar cluster of birds was encountered on 16, 17
and 20 June 2002 on the upper slopes of Tham Danda
27°31'N 87°03'E in MBBZ (Table 1). This temperate
forest spur forms the watershed between the lower
o
JACK H. COX
Forktail 22 (2006)
Sankhuwa and lower Sisuwa kholas, about 1 8 km from the
Ishuwa location. At least three pairs were observed at
2,695-2,810 m in cut-over mixed broadleaf forest
comprising maple, michelia Michelia champaca , oaks
Quercus lamellosa and Q. semecarpifolia, with a heavily
thinned understorey of patchy ningalo, broadleaf saplings
and tall ferns.
Behaviour
At Ishuwa Khola, three males were observed displaying
agitatedly near their nests or presumed nest sites. The
male at the first nest was flushed 8 m to the edge of a
malingo clump. It perched partially obscured on a fallen
stalk c. 1 5 cm above the ground, faced me, and displayed
its tail. With the tip of the tail pointed downwards, the
feathers were splayed in a tilted arc, resembling the opening
of a warped hand fan, and were held motionless for c. 1 5
seconds (Plate 1 ) . This behaviour recalled the tail-flaring
behaviour of other muscicapids, e.g. White-capped Water
Redstart Chaimarrornis leucocephalus , Blue Whistling
Thrush Myophonus caeruleus, and to a lesser degree, White¬
tailed Robin Myiomela leucura. The shortwing then made
low agile flights around the malingo base, pausing to flick
its wings repeatedly while emitting a hard took contact
note at 10-20 second intervals.
The male at the second nest was bolder and even more
agitated than the first, giving took calls at a similar rate, but
mainly as a double note while hopping along fallen bamboo,
apparently to distract me from the nest. The less
conspicuous female behaved similarly, halting after each
progression on the forest floor until I approached to within
4-5 m, and once backtracked towards me when I did not
follow. Both birds flicked their wings at 3-5 second
intervals, usually preceded in the male by a robin-like,
grating alarm call, rendered as tt-tt-tt-tt by Lister (1954).
Subsequently, the male was observed dashing adroitly and
sleekly through the undergrowth, mostly along fallen canes,
and without flicking its tail or wings, very similar to the
‘running like a rat’ behaviour observed by Rippon (1901)
in Burma and Ali (1962) in Sikkim. It halted briefly on a
bamboo cane to give bursts of wing-flicking in unison with
depressing and fanning of its tail. The male next perched
in full view c. 1 5 cm above the ground, stretched towards
me, and proceeded to bob its head up and down in 3-12
second bouts. Moments later there followed a bizarre
sequence of uniformly deep, downward jerks of its head,
then a simultaneous combination of depressed tail-fanning,
wing-flicking, and while leaning farther forward below the
horizontal, slow twisting of its head to one side, then the
other.
Another blue male was encountered giving alarm calls
and parts of its song, in particular the initial wheezy notes
as noted by Robson (2000), and ‘odd sucking and popping
noises’ as characterised by Smythies (1986). This male
also dashed rapidly along fallen bamboo, and exhibited
similar wing-flicking with tail-flaring. A third blue male
carrying nesting material gave took took and wheezy calls,
and a short, highly oscillating warble. When not singing
the bird flicked both its wings and tail, or alternately fanned
its tail outwards without wing-flicking.
A brown-plumaged male was observed singing from
the ground with drooped wings and raised tail, similar to
the in-song behaviour reported for Rusty-bellied
Shortwing B. hyperythra (Mauro and Vercruysse 2000),
and flicked its wings and tail in unison at rest. At Tham
Danda, a brown breeding male gave a more rudimentary
display, occasionally fanning but not dipping its tail, and
alternating this with wing-flicking. A weak scolding
cheep... cheep was uttered, sometimes slowing to a softer
chileep. . . chileep. A soft tick. . . tick call was also given, lacking
the hard quality of the blue male tock calls. A breeding
female also gave similar calls. Two other vocalising blue
males were seen wing-flicking, tail-fanning and tail¬
dipping, while emitting hard tick... tick calls.
Plumage
When agitated, the supercilium in blue males was flared,
appearing wider and more rectangular than normally
observed or depicted (e.g. Fleming et al. 1 984, Grimmett
et al. 1998), and tapering at the back of the eye rather than
extending into the nape as illustrated by Ali and Ripley
(1995; 1997) and King et al. (1975) (Plate 1).
Forktail 22 (2006)
Breeding behaviour and nesting ecology of White-browed Shortwing in Nepal
3
The supercilium on a brown male observed at 3 m
range on Tham Danda was neatly squared-off at the
forehead, extended higher above the eye, and tapered into
the nape (Plate 1). The white supercilium of brown males
readily separates them from otherwise similarly plumaged
females. Ali (1962) stated that brown males show more
chestnut on the wings and tail compared to females. This
could not be determined for the male in the Ishuwa, which
was seen in suboptimal light. However, a distinctly
rufescent tail was noted on the brown male at Tham Danda.
Rufescent wings and tail are evident in the two female
skins in the Smithsonian Institution (NMNH), and in 22
out of 24 females examined at the Natural History Museum,
Tring (BMNH). However, only eight out of 19 brown
males at BMNH show a rufescent wash, and in six of these
the wash is noticeably reduced in intensity compared to
females (personal observation). Robson (2000, 2002)
noted that the lores of brown B. m. cruralis males are
darker than in females. This difference could not be
determined in the field, but is apparent in NMNH
specimens (personal observation).
Nesting
Two active nests were found near Dzo Kharka (2,940 m) .
The first was built on a very steep slope (>60°) c.20 m
from the meadow in a heap of fallen, mostly dead malingo
canes, on mossy maple branches (Plates 2-3). The site
was in open maple-rhododendron forest (mainly Acer
campbellii and Rhododendron arboreum ) , with an understorey
dominated by dense bamboo clumps interspersed with
thin patchy ground cover of short shrubs, herbs and ferns.
The nest was a cone-shaped woven structure of dried leafy
malingo twigs and maple leaves, 43 cm in length, 3 cm
above the ground, recessed and suspended in canes and
branches, camouflaged and well-hidden from view. The
entrance was at the top, directly over the cup, and obscured
by canes, drooping strands of moss, and leaf litter. A lateral
entrance, as mentioned by several authors (Oates 1889,
Baker 1933, Ali 1962, Ali and Ripley 1 997, Robson 2000)
was not present. The cup was 1 2 cm deep, 1 1 cm wide at
the rim, and lined with green moss and a single birch
Betula utilis leaf. Three eggs inside were opaque white,
tinged pink and deduced to have been freshly laid. Egg-
colour has previously been reported as ‘pure white’ (Oates
1889, Osmaston 1904) and ‘white’ (Ali and Ripley 1973).
The nest was attended by a pair, with the female incubating
on 8 and 9 May 2000.
The second nest was found at about the same altitude
c.80 m to the west in dense malingo along an overgrown
trail. Nest composition and structure was different,
consisting mainly of green moss but loosely interwoven
(particularly on the exterior) with thin strands of dead,
leafy malingo twigs and dried moss (Plate 4). The mossy
egg chamber was more deeply recessed (depth=19 cm),
and lined in the bottom with small malingo leaves and fern
roots, but otherwise empty. The outer bamboo and moss
stitching formed a sheath around the egg chamber,
extending as a cone 1 5 cm above the rim and tapering
below the rim c.30 cm to the nest base. A lateral entrance
was located adjacent to the egg chamber. The nest was
built on three bent overlapping bamboo canes 23 cm
above the ground, and was fairly conspicuous. A male
and female were within 2-5 m of the nest when first
encountered. Both birds were easily lured into the open
for close views.
Plate 2. Nest site ofWhite-browed Shortwing, Ishuwa Khola, Makalu-
Barun National Park, Nepal.
Plate 3. Top ofWhite-browed Shortwing nest, Ishuwa Khola, Makalu-
Barun National Park, Nepal.
4
JACK H. COX
Forktail 22 (2006)
Plate 4. Nest of White-browed Shortwing, Ishuwa Khola, Makalu-
Barun National Park, Nepal.
A third nest, located at c.2,7 1 0 m on Tham Danda in
wet mixed oak-maple forest, was built c.12 cm off the
ground in the mossy base of a spindly shrub at the edge
of ningalo bamboo (Plate 5). The cup-like structure was
made entirely of green moss and lined with black and
brown moss rhizomes. There was no lateral entrance.
Hanging strands of moss partially concealed the nest.
Three nestlings inside were nearly fledged when inspected
on 20 June 2002. A blue male, female and brown male
were observed in the immediate vicinity, each carrying
food. The female was particularly vocal and conspicuous.
DISCUSSION
Behaviour
Nesting males presented displays that apparently served
to distract potential predators away from the nest. These
various displays, in particular the more complex and eye¬
catching, may derive from still unknown courtship
behaviour that similarly functions to attract attention.
Females also emerged evidently to distract the observer
from the nest, but gave only vocalisations and wing-flicking.
Plumage
Baker ( 1 924) was first to report that males often breed in
immature plumage. Stevens (1925) reported that ‘males
in many cases breed at the extreme upper limit of [the
species’s] distribution in the feminine phase of coloration’
in eastern Nepal at 2,895-3,095 m. Baker (1933) refined
his earlier frequency of female-like breeding plumage to
‘as often in the immature as in the mature plumage’, and
Plate 5. Nest of White-browed Shortwing, Tham Danda, Makalu-
Barun Buffer Zone, Nepal.
surmised that some males in the eastern Himalayas may
never acquire blue plumage.
Soon thereafter, Ludlow and Kinnear (1 937) recorded
the juvenile plumage, which resembles that of females,
but features distinctive pale spotting on the head and
breast. This difference may have led them to discount the
possibility of an intermediate phase of male plumage and
opine that males are dimorphic. Oates (1883) considered
that young males resembling females in Burma were in
transition to adult male plumage, stating that the lores
soon change to black and the white supercilium appears
before any blue feathers. Colour of the lores is one of the
few (and subtle) plumage differences between females
and brown males: females show rufous lores, forehead
and orbital skin, and a short, slightly pale supercilium
lacking white (Robson 2000).
Deignan (1945) likewise posited brown males as a
transition phase in northern Thailand. Ah and Ripley
(1973, 1997) concluded that many males may breed in
female-like plumage (citing 1 8 of 42 specimens measured
by Kinnear), and reiterated Baker’s comment on the
possible permanence of brown plumage. In Burma, Oates
(1883) and Smythies (1953, 1986) considered the male
dimorphic with two phases ‘of equal frequency’. Robson
(2000, 2002), without elaboration, regarded the brown-
plumaged male as a first-winter phase.
Ludlow and Kinnear (1937) summarised wing
measurements suggesting that blue males are larger than
brown males and females (Table 2). Unfortunately, the
raw data were not published. Other authors did not
distinguish between blue and brown males, or presented
small data sets or summarised data (Table 2). In January
Forktail 22 (2006)
Breeding behaviour and nesting ecology of White-browed Shortwing in Nepal
D
2002, I therefore measured skins of cruralis in BMNH,
Tring, U.K. which were collected mainly by Hodgson in
Nepal, Sikkim and India. Wing length of blue males was
found to be significantly greater than either females (t=
5.56, P<0.001) or brown males (t = 4.78, P< 0.00 1), but
there was no significant difference between brown males
and females (Table 2).
Brown-plumaged males are probably subadult birds
that breed in transitional plumage. The less elaborate
display and weak vocalisations of a brown-plumaged male
I observed are consistent with this theory (Oates 1883,
Deignan 1945). Female-plumaged breeding males are
known ‘in many other short-wing chats’ (Baker 1933),
e.g. Lesser Shortwing B. leucophrys (Ali and Ripley 1997),
White-bellied Redstart Hodgsonius phoenicuroides (Ali and
Ripley 1987), and Black Redstart Phoenicurus ochruros
(Fleming et al. 1984). Subadult males may benefit from
breeding in female-like plumage by avoiding the costs of
male-male competition that would be incurred if they
attempted to breed in full male-type plumage.
Nesting
Initial observations of breeding biology were recorded in
the 1840s by Hodgson from collectors working in the
Darjeeling area (northern Bengal, India) and in central
Nepal. According to Hodgson, the species builds a
‘somewhat globular’ nest with a lateral entrance, attached
to creepers near the ground at the base of a tree trunk.
Nests are built of green moss and moss roots, with bamboo
leaves and pieces of fern affixed to the exterior. Hair-like
fibres line an inner cup containing 3-4 eggs . The breeding
season was stated as April and May (Hume 1873).
Hume’s draft report of 1 873 was subsequently edited
and published by Oates ( 1 889), who retained Hodgson’s
nesting data for White-browed Shortwing, but erroneously
included data from three nests of very different structure:
a 5x10 cm shallow cup composed mainly of fine black
roots placed 60-90 cm above the ground in brushwood.
The nests were found in Sikkim at 1 ,500-2,400 m in June
and contained 2-4 undescribed eggs. Osmaston (1904)
was skeptical of Oates’s additional nests and reported
finding seven nests in June and July 1903 near Darjeeling
at 1,800-2,400 m. All his nests were like Hodgson’s:
concealed, moss-covered domed structures on a rock face
or tree trunk, lined with fine roots, and accessed via a
lateral entrance. Maximum clutch size was given as three.
Baker (1933) described very similar nests of the species
from wet oak-rhododendron forests at 1,500-1,890 m in
Table 2. Wing length (mm) of White-browed Shortwing.
the Khasia Hills (north-east India). However, he ascribed
the first nest ever found of White-browed Shortwing to F.
Gleadow, who purportedly gave a cup-like nest lined with
fern stalks to Osmaston. The citation refers to Osmaston
(1898), part II of an article on birds nesting in India that
contains no shortwing records, and there are none in part
I either (Osmaston 1897). Gleadow’s nest reportedly
contained two White-browed Shortwing eggs and a third
egg which was attributed to Lesser Cuckoo Cuculus
poliocephalus (Baker 1933). This instance of brood
parasitism was subsequently repeated by Ali and Ripley
(1973, 1997) and Robson (2000), although Osmaston
(1898) wrote that the host species had not been observed,
and appealed for suggestions regarding its identity.
Except for the lack of a lateral entrance in two of the
nests I observed, they conform to Hodgson’s description
(as cited by Hume 1873), and do not differ substantially
from those reported by Osmaston (1904) and Baker
( 1 933) . Differences in nesting material may be explained
by local availability. Undergrowth at the Ishuwa sites was
dominated by bamboo and was relatively deficient in moss .
Through much of its range, White-browed Shortwing
often occurs near forested streams (Delacour 1 947, Meyer
de Schauensee 1984) or favours such habitat (Smythies
1953, Ali and Ripley 1973, Inskipp and Inskipp 1991,
Grimmett et al. 1998, MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
Martens and Geduldig (1990) categorise the species as a
‘torrent bird’, based on observed affinity to running water
and the high pitch of whistled parts of its song. However,
the nearest water (a small trickle) at the first nest in the
Ishuwa was c.100 m away, and flowing water was even
farther (c. 1 80 m) from the second nest. The nearest water
at the Tham Danda site was not determined, but there was
none within 100 m.
Status
White-browed Shortwing has probably been overlooked
in Nepal owing to its silent and shy behaviour outside the
breeding season. Based on encounters from the 2000,
2002 and other treks (Cox 1999; unpublished data) in
suitable habitat in central and eastern Nepal, in particular
moist, lower temperate broadleaf forest with a bamboo-
dominant understorey, the species is locally fairly common.
Since description of the species by Blyth in 1843
(Roonwal and Nath 1947) thirteen subspecies of White-
browed Shortwing have been partitioned, including seven
from the Philippines (Kennedy etal. 2000). As the BMNH
and NMNH collections show, male plumage varies
6
JACK H. COX
Forktail 22 (2006)
markedly among apparently isolated forms in the
Philippines, China, South Asia and the Greater Sundas.
Further studies of reproductive biology and plumage
phases would be valuable, but more urgent need arguably
exists for taxonomic review and ecological research to
determine the conservation requirements of this enigmatic
and intriguing species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper was made possible by tire contributions of many people. I
am most grateful to field assistants Dirga S. Rai, Rajan Rai, Nabin
Limbu, Jitan Rai, (the late) Nai Kumar Rai, and the Dorje Sherpa
family of Norbuchaur, without whose unstinting help with logistics
and guidance the Ishuwa passage would have failed. Dirga S. Rai,
Rajan Rai, Jitan Rai, Kriti Rai and Indra T amang provided outstanding
field support on the east Nepal trek in 2002. Special thanks to Kriti Rai
and Dirga S. Rai for their shortwing observations on Tham Danda,
and to Haris Rai for help with plant identification. The late Phil Hall
greatly assisted with statistical analyses and reviewed drafts of this
paper, which helped produce a much improved final version. James
Dean and Pamela Rasmussen granted access to reference material,
both written and feathered at NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, and
provided other data and helpful suggestions. Courtney Shaw of NMNH
also provided access and on several occasions quickly relayed additional
reference material. Robert Prys-Jones, Frank Steinheimer and Michael
Walters at BMNH facilitated access to collections and gave other
welcome assistance. John Anderton painted Plate 1 and Arun
Manandhar helped produce Plates 2-5.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. (1962) The birds of Sikkim. Madras: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, D. (1973) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan.
Vol. 8. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan. Second edition. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, D. (1995) A pictorial guide to the birds of the Indian
Subcontinent. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford
University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, D. (1997) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan.
Vol. 8. Second edition. Mumbai: Oxford University Press.
Baker, E. C. S. (1924) The fauna of British India. Birds. Vol. II. Second
edition. London: Taylor and Francis.
Baker, E. C. S. (1933) The nidification of birds of the Indian empire. Vol.
II. London: Taylor and Francis.
Biswas, B. (1961) The birds of Nepal. Part 5. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
58: 653-677.
Cox, J. (1999) An assessment of habitats and human interaction in the
Hmkhu, Hongu, Kasuwa and Barun kholas of Makalu-Barun National
Park and peripheral areas. Kathmandu: The Mountain Institute.
Davison, G. W. H. (1992) Birds of Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Kota
Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo).
Delacour, J. (1947) Birds of Malaysia. New York: The Macmillan
Company.
Deignan, H. G. (1945) The birds of northern Thailand. Bulletin 186.
Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
Fleming, R. Sr., Fleming, R. Jr. and L. Bangdel (1984) Birds of Nepal.
Third edition. Kathmandu: Nature Himalayas.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Grimmett, R. Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2000) Birds of Nepal. New
Delhi: Prakash Book Depot.
Harrison, T. (1963) Downward zonation of the Blue Shortwing (and
other Malaysian high montane birds). Sarawak Mus. J. 10: 605-609.
Hume, A. (1873) Nests and eggs of Indian birds. Rough draft. Part 1-3.
Calcutta: Office of Superintendent of Government Printing.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1991) A guide to the birds of Nepal. Second
edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, Jr., H. C.,
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines. New
York: Oxford University Press.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C., and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) Afield
guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Lister, M. D. (1954) A contribution to the ornithology of the Darjeeling
area. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 52: 20-68
Ludlow, F. and KinnearN. B. (1937) The birds of Bhutan and adjacent
territories of Sikkim and Tibet. Part II. Ibis 14(1): 249-293.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (1993) A field guide to the birds of
Borneo, Sumatra, Java, and Bali. The Greater Sunda Islands. New
York: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of China.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Martens, J. and Eck, S. (1995) Towards an ornithology of the Himalayas:
systematics, ecology and vocalizations of Nepal birds. Bonn: Zoologisches
Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Loenig (Bonner
Zoologische Monographien, Nr. 38).
Martens, J. and Geduldig, G. (1990) Acoustic adaptations of birds
living close to Himalayan torrents. Proc. in 1 00 DO-G Meeting, Current
Topics Avian Biol., Bonn 1988: 123-131.
Mauro, I. and Vercruysse, E. (2000) Rusty-bellied Shortwing
Brachypteryx hyperythra at Lava, Darjeeling, India in April and June
1996. Forktail 16: 176-178.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. Washington: The
Smithsonian Press.
Oates, E. W. (1883) A handbook to the birds of British Burmah including
those found in the adjoining state of Karennee. Vol. I. London: Porter
and Dulau and Co.
Oates, E. W., ed. (1889) The nests and eggs of Indian birds by Allan O.
Hume. Second edition. Vol. I. London: R. H. Porter.
Osmaston, B. B. (1897) Birds’ nesting in the Tons Valley. Part I. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 1 1: 64-72.
Osmaston, B. B. (1898) Birds’ nesting in the Tons Valley. Part II. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 11: 468-473.
Osmaston, B. B. (1904) Notes on the breeding of certain birds near
Darjeeling. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 15: 510-515.
Rippon, G. (1901) On the birds of the Southern Shan States, Burma.
Ibis 8(1): 525-561.
Robson, C. (2000) A guide to the birds of South-East Asia. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Robson, C. (2002) Field guide to the birds of Thailand. London: New
Holland.
Roonwal, M. L. and Nath, B. ( 1947) Critical remarks on the systematics
of the White-browed Shortwing Heteroxenicus cruralis cruralis (Blyth) .
Rec. Indian Mus. 45: 321-328.
Smythies, B. E. (1953) The birds of Burma. Second edition. London:
Oliver and Boyd.
Smythies, B. E. (1986) The birds of Burma. Third edition. London:
Oliver and Boyd.
Stevens, H. (1925) Notes on the birds of the Sikkim Himalayas. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 30: 352-379.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia) : an annotated
checklist. London: British Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list no. 7).
Jack H. Cox, 2919 Colony Road, Charlotte, NC 28211, U.S.A. Email: jackcoxjr@yahoo.com
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 7-22
The birds of the Togian islands,
Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
MOCHAMAD INDRAWAN, SOEKARJA SOMADIKARTA, JATNA SUPRIATNA,
MURRAY D. BRUCE, SUNARTO and GURITNO DJANUBUDIMAN
We carried out surveys on the T ogian islands, situated between the northern and eastern peninsulas of Sulawesi, Indonesia, during 1996-
2002, visiting all but one of the seven largest islands and two offshore islets. A total of 72 species was previously known for the islands,
based on collections in 1871 and 1 939 and some observations from the 1 980s. We recorded 86 species including 34 new records, giving
a total of 106 species for the islands. We regard as erroneous the records of five species previously listed for the islands: Yellow-crested
Cockatoo Cacatua sulphured, Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting , Sulawesi Pygmy Woodpecker Dendrocopos temminckii, Zitting
Cisticola Cisticola juncidis and Grey-sided Flowerpecker Dicaeum celebicum. The 20 species known only from earlier records include a
number assumed to be resident and thus expected to be found. Five rails and four owls, (including a new species, Togian Hawk Owl
Ninox burhani) were recorded, families previously unknown from the Togian islands. Three subspecies endemic to the Togian islands
are currently recognised: Brown Cuckoo Dove Macropygia amboinensis atrata, Golden Bulbul Alophoixus ajfinis aureus and Sulawesi
Babbler Trichastoma celebense togianense. However, we found two additional possible new species and several possible undescribed
subspecies, suggesting a greater degree of avian endemism in these islands than hitherto known.
INTRODUCTION
The Togian islands are a small archipelago of c.35 islands
scattered in the Gulf of Tomini at 0°7'-0°6'S 121°33'-
1 22°24'E, between the northern and eastern peninsulas of
Sulawesi (Fig. 1 ) . They lie on a shallow submarine plateau
less than 200 m deep, and are clustered fairly close together,
except for the more isolated Una-una, which rests on deeper
waters (500-2,000 m deep) . The island group, which covers
c. 59,000 ha of land and 108,000 ha of marine waters,
features an outstanding biodiversity (e.g. Whitten et al.
2002, Allen and McKenna 2001), with natural ecosystems
including forests, mangroves, seagrass, and coral reefs.
The forest comprises monsoon and evergreen forest, and
is interspersed with mixed gardens of coconut, clove, cocoa,
and durian. Monsoon forest is found on nutrient-poor
podzolic soils on smaller islands, such as Malenge, and is
characterised by a preponderance of figs. Evergreen forest
grows on limestone on larger islands such as Batudaka (D.
Supriyadi in litt. 1997).
Reasonably detailed information on the vegetation
structure and phenology of the lowland forest on Malenge
is available (Supriadi 1996). It is located on undulating to
steep terrain, with a tall (>20 m), often discontinous
canopy, featuring trees dominated by a girth class of 30-
50 cm. It is dominated by ‘manggis hutan’ Garcinia dulcis
(Rubiaceae), ‘Iasi ’ Andinauclea flagifolia (Clusiaceae) and
‘ulos’ Streblus ilicifolius (Moraceae). Forest fires in April
1998, following 18 months with virtually no rain, burnt
two-thirds of Malenge (A. Dodoa verbally 1999), but it
seems that both forest and wildlife in Malenge are quickly
recovering from the fire impacts (A. Dodoa verbally 1999;
MI personal observations 2000, 2001).
On Togian island, logging activities have left very few
trees whose diameter exceeds 50 cm, and the remnant
areas are characterised as ‘moderately disturbed’ (Sidiyasa
2000). However, many fruiting trees of economic value
remain extensive, such as ‘cempedak’ Artocarpus integer,
durian Dnrio zibethinus , ‘rao’ Dracontomelon dao , ‘tea’
Artocarpus elastica, mango Mangiferafoetida , and aren palm
Arenga pinnata. Secondary forest trees that are commonly
encountered include ‘kole’ Alphitonia excelsa, ‘ndolia’
Cananga odorata, Anthocephalus chinensis, Duabanga
moluccana, Alstonia spectabilis, Mallotus spp., and
Macaranga spp. Two species that often dominate
secondary forest on Sulawesi, Alphitonia incana and
Trichospermum morotaense, were found to be abundant.
Stands of Duabanga moluccana were frequent in valleys,
often co-occurring with Nauclea orientalis and Octomeles
moluccana (Sidiyasa 2000).
Figure 1. Map showing location of the Togian islands.
8
MOCHAMAD INDRAWAN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Batudaka has less-disturbed forest and fewer fruiting
trees than Togian island; ‘uni’ Emerilia ovalis, ‘siuri’
Koordersiodendron pinnatum and ‘aren’ Arenga pinnata were
scarce. Instead, ‘kayubesi’ Intsia bijuga , Gamga floribunda,
Sterculia macrocarpa, Dysoxylum aliaceum , and members
of Sapotaceae, which are rare on Togian island, occur in
abundance. As on Togian island, Alphitonia incana and
Trichospermum morotaense, were found to be abundant
(Sidiyasa 2000).
Ornithological studies
The avifauna of these islands has hitherto been poorly
known. White and Bruce ( 1 986) listed a total of 63 species
for the islands. To our knowledge, A. B. Meyer was the
first ornithologist to collect specimens from the islands, in
August 1871 (Walden 1 87 1 , 1 872, 1 874, Meyer 1 879; see
also Meyer and Wiglesworth 1898 for a revised tabulation
of Meyer’s Togian records, including species overlooked
by White and Bruce [1986]). According to Ripley (1941:
344), Meyer visited Togian island and recorded a total of
58 species. Shortly after his return to Germany in 1872,
Meyer sold his collection, with most going to the Museum
fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin
(ZMB) and some to the Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde
(MTD) in Dresden. Through later exchanges, a small
number of specimens are now scattered amongst various
museums, including the Naturhistorisches Museums
Wien, Austria (NMW; see Schifter 1990), the Natural
History Museum, T ring, U.K. (NHM; Meyer’s specimens
were received with the Tweeddale collection: see Sharpe
1 906), and the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale (MSNM)
in Milan, Italy (cf. Roselaar 2003). However, the actual
number of specimens collected by Meyer and their current
location has not been fully documented.
In 1939, the commercial collector J. J. Menden (or one
or more of his assistants) briefly visited Una-una during 3-
6 September, on his way to undertake a collecting
expedition in northern Sulawesi. While the expedition
was still in northern Sulawesi, Menden, or one or more of
his assistants, collected on Malenge from 24 November
1939 for at least one month, based on Sody (1949) and
specimen label dates in Zoological Museum of Amsterdam
(ZMA; K. Roselaar in Hu. 2004). The small number of
specimens from this collection in ZMA suggests additional
specimens may reside elsewhere, or that Menden’s directive
was to focus on mammals. Menden’s collection was
deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, (MCZ; Ripley 1941) with
several specimens subsequently exchanged with other
museums, including the Field Museum of Natural History,
Chicago (FMNH). The small Malenge island collection
was deposited by Sody at ZMA. There are additional
specimens elsewhere including the National Museum of
Natural History, Leiden (RMNH), and the Museum
Zoologicum Bogoriense, Bogor (MZB).
In a summary of notable records from Sulawesi during
1978-1981, Watling (1983) also mentioned observations
from the Togian islands in November 1980, but with no
indication of exactly how long he was there and which
island was visited. However, as only four conspicuous,
coastal species were mentioned (two pigeons, a parrot,
and a kingfisher), this suggests his visit was brief and
probably transitory. During 6 August to 21 September
1 987, ‘Proyek Kelelawar’ from Oxford University and the
Research and Development Biology Centre, Indonesian
Institute of Sciences (LIPI) made opportunistic bird
observations while studying bats (Owen et al. 1 987), and
recorded several species for the first time on the Togian
islands.
Between 1996 and 2002, we carried out bird surveys
during ecological and conservation studies mounted by
the Indonesian Foundation for the Advancement of
Biological Sciences (YABSHI), in collaboration with
volunteers from Earthwatch (Supriadi 1 996, Supriadi and
Supriatna 1996, Supriatna et al. 1996), initially on
Malenge, and subsequently on Togian and Talatakoh
islands. Further studies in Batudaka, Una-una, and Walea
Bahi were conducted by MI, occasionally assisted by Amir
Dodoa and Yunus Masala (on Una-una island).
METHODS
The surveys (Table 1 ) aimed to compile basic information
on the status, distribution and natural history of the bird
fauna. The habitats surveyed included closed primary
forest, secondary vegetation, cultivated areas, freshwater
wetlands, beaches and coasts, and brackish water
(including mangroves). Field observations were done
mainly by MI, S and GD, with the help of Earthwatch
volunteers (in 1996-1998) and local villagers. Table 1
excludes dates spent travelling and conducting more
general ecological or anthropological research, during
which some bird observations were made. Prior to 1998
when we aquired Coates and Bishop (1997), we used
identification guides for adjacent regions (MacKinnon
and Phillipps 1993, Beehler et al. 1986), plus family
monographs (e.g. Walters 1991). For regional endemics,
detailed notes were taken in the field and subsequently
compared to skins in MZB. Calls were noted and checked
against published sources, especially Holmes and Phillipps
(1996). Earthwatch volunteers, despite having mostly
negligible previous experience of bird surveys in the tropics,
became increasingly proficient and some detailed
descriptions made a direct contribution to the species list.
Local villagers’ knowledge of birds was sought by showing
them field guides and asking them to indicate which birds
occurred in the area. This was checked against the authors’
knowledge of previous records. Vernacular names for
Togian birds were gathered with the help of local farmers
(A. Dodoa and Taskir, both also former hunters). The
local names were mainly T ogianese, but when unavailable,
the Saluanese name was noted (from the Poso region on
the eastern peninsula of mainland Sulawesi); these are
listed in Appendix 1 (see also Lowe [1999]).
Table 1. Dates and islands covered by the surveys.
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
9
A limited number of specimens were collected for
MZB, namely Blue-faced Rail Gymnocrex rosenbergii (two
birds, trapped for food by local people), Ashy Woodpecker
Mulleripicusfulvus (one), Togian Hawk Owl Ninox burhani
(two), Sulawesi Owl Tyto rosenbergii (one), and a white-
eye Zosterops sp. (one). Subsequently, specimens were
examined at MZB, and curators at FMNH, MCZ, MTD,
NMW, RMNH, ZMA and ZMB were consulted. Data
on specimens at NHM were extracted from the Catalogue
of the birds in the British Museum (e.g. Sharpe 1892,
Saunders 1896, Salvadori 1893, Sharpe 1898). Taxonomy
and nomenclature follow Inskipp etal. (1996) to the species
level, with comments on subspecies following White and
Bruce (1986), and gender agreement corrected following
Dickinson (2003). Other taxonomic changes documented
by Dickinson (2003) have also been highlighted.
RESULTS
We recorded a total of 86 species, plus six species whose
identification remains unconfirmed (Australian Koel, an
undescribed scops owl taxon, Lesser Frigatebird, Elegant
Pitta, White-rumped Triller, and an undescribed white-
eye taxon). Our surveys added 34 species to the Togian
islands’ list, giving a total of 106 species with confirmed
records, which are listed below. This includes one
Vulnerable species (Blue-faced Rail Gymnocrex rosenbergii)
and four Near Threatened species (Blue-crowned
Racquet-tail Prioniturus discurus , Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl
Ninox ochracea , Pied Cuckooshrike Coracina bicolor and
Nicobar Pigeon Caloenas nicobarica ; BirdLife International
200 1 , 2004) . Unconfirmed records and erroneous records
are indicated with square brackets.
Annotated list of the birds of the Togian islands
Philippine Scrubfowl Megapodius cumingii
Single birds were occasionally seen in primary and
secondary forests on Walea Bahi, Malenge and Togian;
calls were heard frequently in the morning and afternoon
(see also Firman 1996). No active nest mounds were
found. Birds in the Togian islands are of the recently
reinstated subspecies gilbertii (see Dickinson 2003).
Blue-breasted Quail Cotumix chinensis
One male was seen crossing a path beside a paddyfield at
Benteng, Togian island, on 30 July 2001 .
RED JUNGLEFOWL Gallus gallus
This species was not seen during the study but its calls
were heard in secondary and primary forest and it was
identified by local farmers on T ogian, Malenge and Walea
Bahi. It is likely that the birds are of feral origin, although
they have probably been resident on the Togian islands
for a long time. The species is widely trapped and snared
for food.
Spotted Whistling-duck Dendrocygna guttata
Groups of up to eight were seen regularly on the
brackish pond behind Uemata, Malenge, in 1996 and
1997. A group of up to six birds was also seen on a pond
in a logged area in Benteng, Togian island, on 22
December 1999.
SUNDA TEAL Anas gibberifrons
On Malenge, birds were found with whistling-ducks on
the brackish pond behind Uemata, Malenge, in 1 996 and
1 997. The specific identity of all Anas sp. ducks observed
could not be resolved confidently from our field
observations. However, the diagnostic forehead bump of
Sunda Teal was seen on at least three birds; presumably
all or most birds were of this species, and not the similar¬
looking Grey Teal Anas gracilis. On 19 August 1996, three
juveniles in a group of seven birds were observed on the
shore of Kadoda (Malenge). Five birds were seen
swimming at sea, c.100 m offshore on 7 July 2000. On
T ogian island, a sighting of six birds was made in a mangal
forest at Baulu on 31 December 1999.
[Sulawesi Pygmy Woodpecker Dendrocopos temminckii
The species was not found during the survey and its listing
as occurring in the T ogian islands appears to be erroneous.
Neither Meyer (1879) nor Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898)
listed it, nor did Menden (Ripley 1941). Peters (1948)
included the Togian islands in the range of this species,
although Voous ( 1 947) had not. Peters had been curator
at MCZ and had also received many of Menden’s
specimens, some of which were previously overlooked
(see White and Bruce 1986). However, there is no Togian
specimen of this species (A. Pirie in litt. 2004) . The source
of the error appears to be Sharpe (1900), whose listing of
this bird for Togian seems to have been based on a
misreading of the extensive distribution table provided by
Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898).]
Ashy Woodpecker Mulleripicusfulvus
This woodpecker was observed in hill forest and coconut
groves onTogian, Malenge and WaleaBahi. Elevenmales
(including one subadult) which were seen well had the red
area extending onto the whole of the crown, which is typical
of the subspecies M. f. wallacei of central, east and south
Sulawesi (Coates and Bishop 1997). Based on Meyer’s
record (1879), White and Bruce (1986) listed theTogian
birds as M. /. fulvus and indeed at least one of Meyer’s
specimens from T ogian can be identified as M. f fulvus (S .
Eck in litt. 2001). Assuming the correct provenance of
Meyer’s specimen and its correct identity as M. f. fulvus,
T ogian could be an area of intergradation between the two
subspecies, or possibly a distinctive subspecies with mixed
characters has evolved: further study is required.
KNOBBED Hornbill Aceros cassidix
This species was encountered on all islands surveyed except
Una-una. On Malenge, it was frequently observed roosting
in flocks of up to 24 birds. On Togian island, a large flock
of 22 birds was also seen at dusk. On Togian island and
Malenge, the species appeared to be relatively abundant,
and we assume that the birds probably move between
fragmented forest patches. On Togian island, these
hornbills descend to mangroves to feed, reportedly
sometimes in quite large numbers. Unexpectedly, it was
also found on the small, forested island of Angkaiyo, and
our local guide reported that it is often seen flying to nearby
larger islands.
Nesting was observed by a local farmer (I. Taskir
verbally 2001) on a Tenninalia sp. tree at the edge of a
mixed garden and cultivated land in Benteng, Togian
island. In August 2000, a pair began enlarging a natural
tree c.15 m above the ground. Two eggs were laid in
10
MOCHAMAD INDRAW AN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
September, but only one hatched. The fledgling was able
to fly after just over a month. During incubation and
chick-feeding, the female stayed at the nest cavity, but did
not seal it, as typically happens (Kinnaird and O’Brien
1 993, Suer Suryadi inlitt. 2005). In February 2001, a pair
were seen again attending the nest in the morning and
evenings, but did not roost overnight, and no breeding
was seen up until May 2001.
DOLLARBIRD Eurystomus orientalis
Singles and pairs were regularly seen on the coast of
Bunawang (Malenge) during August 1996 and June 1997.
The subspecies could not be determined, but the dates
suggest that it was the southern E. o. pacificus, as it occurs
more widely as a visitor in this region than the northern
E. o. orientalis.
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis
Single birds were seen on the coasts of Bunawang and
Uemata (Malenge), Baulu and Lembanato (Togian
island), Kenari (Walea Bahi) and Talatakoh. Most were
probably of the resident subspecies A. a hispidoides , but
the migrant A a. bengalensis could also occur. Meyer (1 879)
originally listed the Togian specimen as /l. asiatica. Walden
(1872, 1874), who named Meyer’s new taxa from the
specimens he sent to Walden, donated the specimen to
the BMNH (=NHM) as part of the Tweeddale collection.
Sharpe (1892) incorrectly identified and placed the
specimen with beavani, which is now treated as Blue-eared
Kingfisher A. meninting. Hence Common Kingfisher has
hitherto been incorrectly omitted from the Togian list.
[Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting
As outlined above, Meyer’s A. atthis specimen was
previously treated incorrectly as this species. There is no
evidence of Blue-eared Kingfisher occurring in the Togian
islands.]
Black-billed Kingfisher Halcyon melanorhyncha
This species was found to be common on the coasts of
Batudaka, Togian, Talatakoh, Malenge and Walea Bahi.
White and Bruce ( 1 986) implied that the bird is scarce on
the mainland of Sulawesi. However, it was also found to
be common on the Banggai islands (Indrawan etal. 1 997) .
This species was recently reinstated in the genus Pelargopsis
by Dickinson (2003).
Ruddy Kingfisher Halcyon coromanda
On Malenge, individuals were observed at Malangkat on
23 August 1996 and 23 November 1998. On Togian
island it was regularly observed in secondary forest, logged
forest and mixed gardens. Two birds on Togian island
and the second bird on Malenge had bold, dark blue
streaking on the back, suggesting they were of the resident
subspecies H. c. rufa. During the northern winter this
kingfisher appeared to be more numerous on Walea Bahi
than on other islands; it is possible that residents are joined
by individuals of the subspecies H. c. major from Japan
and Korea, but confirmation is needed.
Collared Kingfisher Todiramphus chloris
This kingfisher was common, especially in more open
vegetation, on all islands. Sharpe (1892) originally gave
the Togian birds species status as Halcyon meyeri , but this
treatment has not been followed subsequently.
Sacred Kingfisher Todiramphus sanctus
This species was found to be moderately common in
August 1996 and June 1997, during the southern winter.
Five individuals were seen along c.2 km of coast between
Balantak and Kadoda (Malenge) on 24 August 1996.
Rainbow Bee-eater Merops omatus
This species was found to be common in August 1996,
June 1997 and July 2000. About 60 birds were counted in
a single flock on Malenge at dusk on 1 5 August 1996. The
earliest arrivals were recorded at Benteng, Togian island,
on 1 1 May 2001. It was also observed on Una-una.
Plaintive Cuckoo Cacomantis merulinus
This cuckoo was heard only, in secondary forests on
Malenge in July 1997 and at Benteng, Togian island, in
May 200 1 . Dickinson (2003) placed the birds on Sulawesi,
and by implication the Togian islands, in the subspecies
lanceolatus.
Rusty-breasted Cuckoo Cacomantis sepulcralis
One was observed in secondary forest at Bunawang
(Malenge) in September 1996.
BLACK-BILLED KOEL Eudynamys melanorhynchus
Two female specimens are held at ZMB, and a male is
registered but not retained (C. Quaisser inlitt. 2004). We
did not record the species, suggesting that the earlier
records may have referred to visitors rather than rare
residents, perhaps because of an apparent absence of its
preferred hosts (crows Corvus spp.). White-necked Myna
has been suggested as a possible host species in Sulawesi
(White and Bruce 1986) but it too was not found during
the study (although the closely related Sulawesi Myna
Basilomis celebensis occurs).
[AUSTRALIAN Koel Eudynamys cyanocephalus
Koel calls with regularly ascending notes were heard,
apparently differentiating these birds from Black-billed
Koel (Y. Masala verbally 2002) . One was seen in coconut
groves and secondary forest on Una-una on 29 March
2002. These records could have referred to Australian
Koel or Asian Koel E. scolopaceus. The dates suggest that
the former is more likely, but the identity remains
unconfirmed. ]
Yellow-billed Malkoha
Phaenicophaeus calyorhynchus
Meyer (1879) listed this bird for Togian; no specimen
can be found at ZMB, although one is registered
(C. Quaisser in litt. 2004). The species was not collected
by Menden on Una-una (Ripley 1941), and it was not
recorded by us. Assuming the record is valid, the species
could be a rare resident or a visitor. It is tempting to
speculate that the species’s absence or rarity may be
because of competition with the widespread Bay Coucal
Centropus celebensis. Dickinson (2003) listed this species
in the genus Zanclostomus .
LESSER Coucal Centropus bengalensis
On Togian, Malenge and Walea Bahi this species was
found to be moderately common, but it was scarcer on
Una-una. Dickinson (2003) placed birds from Sulawesi,
including by implication those from the Togian islands,
into the subspecies sarasinorum.
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
1 1
BAY COUCAL Centropus celebensis
This species was observed only on a single occasion, in a
mixed garden at Taninkola village, Batudaka on 18 May
200 1 . However its calls were often heard, indicating it was
widespread on Togian, Talatakoh and Batudaka, but rare
or absent on smaller islands. The call was typically a coung
coung mellow hoot, repeated 3-25 times, increasing in
tempo and pitch, and repeated within and between pairs.
Compared to Lesser Coucal, this species appeared to prefer
wooded habitat rather than grassland, and possibly slopes
rather than flatter ground. At least one individual seen
well had black lores, indicating that birds on Togian may
be of the subspecies C. c. rufescens rather than C. c. celebensis ,
or perhaps an undescribed subspecies.
Ornate Lorikeet Trichoglossus omatus
Groups of up to five birds were encountered frequently
on all islands surveyed, although on Una-una groups
usually comprised only 2-3 birds. Birds were recorded
mainly in secondary vegetation and cultivated areas.
[Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphured
Meyer (1879) listed this species for Togian, but this was
erroneous as in the first part of his paper (p. 45) he
specifically stated that he did not meet it there. It was not
listed for Togian in Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898). MTD
have no specimens from the Togian islands, only from
north Sulawesi (S. Eck in litt. 2002). The species is listed
among the Meyer specimens from north Sulawesi at
NMW, and the origin of this single specimen (NMW
50.062; no date; no collection number) was reported to
be‘Baivon TominiO°3TN 120°30,E’ (seeSchifter 1990),
but the coordinates suggested that the locality is on the
shore of the northern arm of the mainland, and not further
south where the Togian islands lie.]
Blue-crowned Racquet-tail Prioniturus discurus
Near Threatened. Distinguishing this species from
Golden-mantled Racquet-tail Prioniturus platurus in the
field was difficult. From museum specimens we noted
that the head markings in males were diagnostic. P. d.
flavicans has a bright red circular patch on the crown
surrounded by an extensive bright blue, whereas Golden-
mantled Racquet-tail has an elongated dull red crown-
patch bordered by purple that extends down to the nape.
In flight, Golden-mantled has a contrasting grey wash on
the lower mantle, which Blue-crowned lacks. Golden-
mantled has a light flight action, with fast twisting and
turning manoeuvres, whereas Blue-crowned has
‘ponderous deep rowing wing-beats’ (Coates and Bishop
1997). Male Blue-crowned Racquet-tails were identified
positively only on two occasions on Malenge and once at
Benteng, Togian island. The latter had a golden wash on
the breast, an extensive blue patch surrounding a red
crown patch, and a whitish-grey bill . A female, which had
a blue wash on the head and a golden wash on the breast
contrasting with the mantle and the rest of the
underparts, was also observed. The species was observed
in secondary growth, mangroves, and beach forest.
Contrary to Coates and Bishop ( 1 997), this species is not
restricted to the northern peninsula of Sulawesi, as it is
also found in the Togian and Banggai islands. While
Inskipp et al. (1996) accepted merging Red-spotted
Racquet-tail P. flavicans with P. discurus , this was not
followed by Dickinson (2003).
Golden-mantled Racquet-Tail Prioniturus platurus
This species appeared to be more common than Blue-
crowned Racquet-tail and occurred in similar habitats.
An adult male was positively identified at Benteng, T ogian
island, when the green breast, golden nape and red
markings surrounded by a purple patch on top of the
crown were clearly seen. A large flock of c.50 birds seen
at Batu Engkang (Malenge) on 5 July 2000 was probably
comprised largely or entirely of this species. Other records
were tentatively identified as this species based on brief
glimpses of plumage and flight action. It would be
interesting to investigate niche partitioning between the
two racquet-tails on the islands.
Great-billed Parrot Tanygnathus megalorynchos
This species was identified positively only once at close
range as it fed on mangos in the gardens of Tanjung
(Malenge). It was considerably larger than the similar
Azure-rumped Parrot T. sumatranus, with much more
extensive blue on the primaries. However, some sightings
assumed to be Azure-rumped Parrot may have referred to
this species.
Azure-rumped Parrot Tanygnathus sumatranus
This parrot appeared to be rather common in secondary
forest, cultivation, and beach areas, with records from
Malenge, Walea Bahi and probably also Togian island.
The unconfirmed records of Great-billed Parrot by
Watling (1983) may in fact refer to Azure-rumped Parrot.
Sulawesi Hanging Parrot Loriculus stigmatus
This species was seen and heard singly or in pairs and it
was found to be common in coastal scrub, coconut groves,
sago swamps and secondary forests, with records from
Batudaka, Togian, Malenge and Walea Bahi. Most birds
had an orange patch on the mantle, but this was lacking
on one seen on 14 June 1997 in the gardens of Tanjung,
Malenge, whereas one seen at Malangkat, Malenge, on
22 November 1998 had a crimson mantle-patch. A pair
were seen allofeeding in the gardens of U emata (Malenge)
on 6 September 1996.
Glossy Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta
Birds foraging singly or in small groups were seen in
virtually every habitat on all islands surveyed. The
subspecific identity was not confirmed, but C. e. esculenta
of central Sulawesi or possibly C. e. manadensis of northern
Sulawesi would be most likely.
GREY-RUMPED TREESWIFT Hemiprocne longipennis
Small groups of up to seven birds were seen in secondary
forest, cultivation, and along beaches and coasts on all
islands except Una-una. This species was listed by
Meyer (1879) and Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898) in
both their tables and species accounts, but it was omitted
in error by White and Bruce (1986). MTD has no
specimens of H. 1. wallacii from the Togian islands (only
from Manado/north Sulawesi, dated March 1 87 1 ; S. Eck
in litt. 2002), but ZMB has a specimen registered under
the name Dendrochelidon wallacii (F. Steinheimer in litt.
2003).
Sulawesi Owl Tyto rosenbergii
On 4 May 2003, a bird was collected by local people on
Togian island and transported alive by MI to a wildlife
12
MOCHAMAD INDRAW AN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
rescue centre in west Java for taxonomic study. From a
preliminary examination the bird appears to be of the
nominate subspecies (Bruce 1999).
[Scops Owl Otus sp.
Local people reported a small owl with ear-tufts from
Benteng, Togian island, which clearly suggests a scops
owl. Based on numerous local interviews this bird appears
to be be more localised, if not scarcer, than Ochre-bellied
Hawk Owl Ninox ochracea and Togian Hawk Owl N.
burhani. The presence of a scops owl on Togian could
have been predicted, and it may well prove to be a new
species. Sound recordings, photographs and specimens
will be needed to investigate this.]
Ochre-bellied Hawk Owl Ninox ochracea
Near Threatened. At 12h00 on 27 July 2001 in Belas,
Benteng, Togian island, two birds were flushed from a
roost 5 m up in a vine tangle in hilly scrub. The diagnostic
ochre belly was seen well (Marks et al. 1999, Indrawan
and Somadikarta 2004).
Togian Hawk Owl Ninox burhani
Observations were made of what proved to be a new species
of hawk owl (Indrawan and Somadikarta 2004). The
species was observed in disturbed lowland and hill forest,
mixed gardens and sago swamp, at elevations from sea
level to 400 m. Although it is found regularly in scrubby
forest, this was always within a mosaic of evergreen
rainforest remnants. It was rare in gardens and villages.
Observations and vocalisations indicate that it is resident
and probably breeds on Malenge, Togian and Batudaka
(personal observations; A. Dodoa, Alan and Salim verbally
2001). Croaking notes believed to be given by this species
were detected further east, on Walea Bahi in March 2002,
suggesting that it is widespread in moderate numbers
through the archipelago. Although the species has a very
small range, it does not seem to be at high risk of extinction
(Indrawan and Somadikarta 2004).
SPOTTED Dove Streptopelia chinensis
This species was commonly heard and seen in secondary
forest and cultivation on Togian and Malenge, and was
also common on scrubby lava fields on Una-una. One of
Menden’s specimens is registered at RMNH (R. W. R. J.
Dekker in litt. 2004).
Brown Cuckoo Dove Macropygia amboinensis
This cuckoo dove was common, with twos and threes
observed in secondary growth and cultivation on Una-
una, Batudaka, Togian, Malenge and Talatakoh. Its call,
an upslurred wu-up given every 5-10 seconds, was
frequently heard. A nest containing one egg was found on
20 December 1 999 in a mixed garden near Benteng, Togian
island. It was located in a sugar palm tree 80 cm above
ground and consisted of dried branches embedded on a
broad leaf lying on top of one of the palm’s pinnated leaves.
Ripley (1941: 351) originally described Togian birds as
M. a. atrata.
White-faced Cuckoo Dove Turacoena manademis
This species’s characteristic pu-ku-ku call was heard
frequently on T ogian, Batudaka and Walea Bahi, but it was
seen much less often. Three birds were seen in secondary
forest at Bunawang, Malenge, on 22 August 1996.
Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica
Singles were frequently seen in secondary growth and
mangroves on Togian island, and the species was also
recorded on Batudaka, Walea Bahi and Una-una. Two
seen in primary forest on Malenge were thought to be
either this species or possibly Stephan’s Dove C. stephani.
Nicobar Pigeon Caloenas nicobarica
Near Threatened. One was seen in secondary forest on
Una-una on 28 November 1998. Local people reported
it to be abundant on Angkaiyo, a small island off Malenge.
In November 1998, two individuals kept by villagers at
Lembanato, T ogian island, were purportedly from nearby
secondary forest at Bambu. On 21 December 1999, a
local villager at Benteng, Togian island, showed us one
that he claimed he had caught in nearby forest. Watling
(1983) saw only one bird in the T ogian islands but pointed
out that local people indicated it to be very common.
Pink-necked Green Pigeon Treron vemans
This pigeon is moderately common on Malenge and Una-
una. Small groups of up to 14 birds were seen regularly at
Bunawang, Malenge.
Grey-cheeked Green Pigeon Treron griseicauda
This species was only seen twice, in small flocks feeding
on fig trees at T anempo and T aninkola, Batudaka, on 1 1
and 18 May 2001 . Birds from Sulawesi were listed as T.
g. zuallacei instead of T. g. griseicauda by Dickinson (2003),
but see White and Bruce (1986).
Black-naped Fruit Dove Ptilinopus melanospilus
On Malenge and Walea Bahi this species was mostly found
in coastal areas, whereas on Togian island it was noted in
secondary forest inland, even penetrating to the upper
slopes of the mountain. On 29 December 1 999, a female
was observed at a nest with a single white egg, 3 m high
in a mangrove tree at Benteng, Togian island. The nest
was only 10m from a path, and was made of twigs and dry
branches. Two active nests were also found in beach
vegetation on Walea Bahi in February 2001, but they
were not studied further in order to minimise disturbance.
White-bellied Imperial Pigeon Ducula forsteni
This species was common in coastal and secondary forest
on Una-una. One bird kept by local people at Katupat,
Togian island, had apparently been caught in nearby forest.
This species is not generally considered to occur on small
islands (White and Bruce 1986); however, it was recently
found in the Sula islands where it also occurs in coastal
habitats (Coates and Bishop 1997).
Green Imperial Pigeon Ducula aenea
This was one of the most common and widespread pigeons,
occurring in coconut groves, mixed gardens and forests,
on Batudaka, T ogian, Talatakoh, Malenge and Walea Bahi.
Although expected, it was not found on Una-una, probably
because of the presence of White-bellied Imperial Pigeon.
Walden (1874) originally described the Togian birds as
Carpophaga pulchella ; Peters (1937) treated them as a D.
a. pulchella , but White and Bruce (1986) treated pulchella
as a synonym of the Sulawesi form, D. a. paulina.
Pied Imperial Pigeon Ducula bicolor
On Una-una this species was found to be the most common
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
13
pigeon on the island, mainly being found in coastal areas.
The species was reported from the Togian islands by
Watling (1983), but the exact island was not specified.
Gibbs et al. (2001) also recorded this species from the
Togian islands, with the map suggesting it occurred only
on Una-una, but this is not specified in the text. Although
we did not confirm its presence elsewhere, it probably
occurs on other islands.
Silver-tipped Imperial Pigeon Ducula luctuosa
This pigeon was found in small groups of up to seven
birds in mangroves at Malangkat, Malenge and Lohpon,
Talatakoh, in June 1997. In the field it was difficult to
distinguish from Pied Imperial Pigeon, but at least some
birds were identified as Silver-tipped Imperial Pigeon by
their creamy colour (instead of pure white) , with the black-
tipped wing having a silvery wash near the tip. Where
both Pied and Silver-tipped Imperial Pigeons occur on
the same islands, they appear to show some habitat
segregation, with the latter more likely to be found inland
than its congener. However, as with their distribution,
further surveys are needed to confirm this. The Pied
Imperial Pigeon group is usually recognised as a species
complex (Bruce 1990, Gibbs et al. 200 1 ), or all forms are
merged in D. bicolor (see Dickinson 2003).
SLATY-LEGGED CRAKE Rallina eurizonoides
One was caught by a villager at Tanempo, Batudaka, on
10 May 2001. It was photographed and immediately
released. The bill was bright green; according to Taylor
and van Perlo (1998), the species has a green bill with
dark brown on the distal half, so the record may refer to
an undescribed form.
BARRED Rail Gallirallus torquatus
This species’s call {kek-kak! kek-kak! bong! bong!) was
heard extensively in secondary forest, mangrove and
swamp forest on Togian island, in scrub on Una-una, and
in mangrove on Walea Bahi. Its vocalisations were not
noted in Malenge, but were probably overlooked. One
bird was seen at dusk on 8 June 1 997 in a freshwater pond
at Bunawang, Malenge. It had dark flanks, a barred white
belly and a prominent white moustachial streak contrasting
with the dark throat and ear-coverts. One was seen briefly
in a sago swamp at Baulu, Togian island, on 3 1 December
1999.
Buff-banded Rail Gallirallus philippensis
One was snared on 23 July 200 1 in a paddyfield at Benteng,
Togian island, by a farmer who reported that the species
is seen frequently in twos and threes. On Una-una, it was
found to be common in late March and early April 2002
(Y. Masala in litt. 2004).
BLUE-FACED Rail Gymnocrex rosenbergii
Vulnerable. On 1 April 2001, one was caught by a snare
in hill forest at Benteng. A second bird was snared on 8
April in a mixed garden 1 km from the first locality. Both
died during transportation and were later prepared as
specimens for MZB . On 20 March 2002, a third individual
was snared at the first locality, but it was immediately
released. A dry landrail with a prominent bright blue eye-
patch, presumably this species, was reported by local
farmers to occur in mixed gardens at Maelam and Benteng,
T ogian island, and the same species also reportedly occurs
on Malenge (A. Dodoa verbally 2001). Blue-faced Rail
was previously thought to be restricted to the Sulawesi
mainland and Peleng, Banggai islands.
WHITE-BREASTED WATERHEN Amauromis phoenicurus
This species was seen and heard on brackish ponds on
Una-una, Malenge and Batudaka.
WHIMBREL Numenius phaeopus
This species was recorded on Malenge in August 1 987 by
Owen etal. (1987), but it was not found during the present
surveys.
Common Redshank Tringa totanus
This species was recorded on Malenge in August 1 987 by
Owen etal. (1987), but it was not found during the present
surveys.
Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola
This species was not found during the present surveys,
although it has been previously listed for the Togian islands
(White and Bruce 1986).
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
Singles were recorded during the northern winter on the
coasts of Una-una, Batudaka, Togian, Malenge and Walea
Bahi.
Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus
This species was not found during die present surveys,
although it has been previously listed (White and Bruce 1986).
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva
A male and a female were collected by Menden (Ripley
1941), but the species was not recorded during the present
surveys.
Lesser Crested Tern Sterna bengalensis
This tern was not found during the present surveys, but
it was previously listed as Pelecanopus medius by Walden
in 1874 (see also Meyer 1879, Saunders 1896).
Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii
This species was recorded by Owen etal. ( 1 987), in August/
September 1987 on Batudaka.
BLACK-NAPED Tern Sterna sumatrana
Mees (1977) pointed out that a Meyer specimen (ZMB
B. 9174 ex B. 9194) identified as Whiskered Tern
Chlidonias hybrida by Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898),
and repeated by Stresemann (1941), actually referred to
juvenile Black-naped Tern. Black-naped Tern was listed
for the Togian islands by de Korte (1991) citing Mees
(1977, 1982). However, Mees (1982) did not mention it,
since this publication focused on records from the
Moluccan islands, not the Togian islands. The species
was also recorded by Owen et al. (1987) on Batudaka in
August/September 1987.
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida
Both C. h. hybrida and C. h. javanica have been listed
from the islands (White and Bruce 1 986), but the species
was not found during the present surveys. NHM holds six
of Meyer’s specimens (five C. h. fluvialis and one C. h.
javanica ; Mees 1977).
14
MOCHAMAD INDRAWAN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
OSPREY Pandion haliaetus
Single birds were recorded regularly along the coasts of
Batudaka, Togian, Talatakoh, Malenge and Walea Bahi.
The species was recorded by Owen et al. (1987) from
Batudaka and Malenge, although no dates were noted.
JERDON’S Baza Aviceda jerdoni
A single bird was observed in the canopy of a mango tree
at Uemata, Malenge, on 7 August 1996.
Black Kite Milvus migrans
Two were seen soaring over the coast of Talatakoh on
28 June 1997.
Brahminy Kite Haliastur Indus
Singles were commonly encountered on the coasts of all
islands surveyed. Three different adults for which good
views were obtained on Togian island had a white breast
without dusky shaft-streaks. This identified them as H. i.
girrenera, whereas White and Bruce ( 1 986) indicated that
only the streaked form H. i. intermedins occurs in the
Togian islands. It is possible that both subspecies occur
on different islands. However, a more plausible
explanation is that the subspecies intergrade (see
Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
WHITE-BELLIED Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster
Singles were occasionally encountered on the coasts of
Una-una, Batudaka, Malenge and Walea Bahi. Owen et
al. ( 1 987) reported the species to be ‘fairly common along
the north coast of the main Togian group’, but provided
no further details.
Sulawesi Serpent Eagle Spilomis mfipectus
Singles were found in coconut groves at Uemata, Kadoda
andTanjung (Malenge) and in mixed gardens at Benteng
(Togian), Tanempo (Batudaka) and Kenari (Walea Bahi).
Sulawesi Goshawk Accipiter griseiceps
One was observed perching on a bare-branched tree in
scrub at Uemata (Malenge) in July 1996 (date not
recorded), and another was seen in the mid-canopy of a
forest tree on the slopes of Benteng, Togian island, on 14
May 2001 .
RUFOUS-BELLIED Eagle Hieraaetus kienerii
One was observed flying over logged forest on the slopes
of Benteng, Togian island, on 22 December 1 999. It had
dark cheeks contrasting with a white throat and chin,
chestnut underparts, and it gave a rising shrill call three
times (see Brown and Amadon 1 968, Ferguson-Lees and
Christie 2001).
Sulawesi Hawk Eagle Spizaetus lanceolatus
An adult was observed on 1 January 2000 perched on top
of a coconut tree in a mixed garden at Benteng, Togian
island, before flying into nearby forest. It was large-bodied,
powerfully built, with a relatively large head and bill
(therefore excluding honey-buzzards, especially Barred
Honey-buzzard Penns celebensis). The breast was boldly
streaked rufous and black, and the legs were feathered
(again, differentiating it from honey-buzzards) and finely
barred black and buffy, while the tail was evenly banded
black and white, with black at the tip. In flight it showed
broad wings with buff underwings barred black. The white
throat and black mesial stripe was not seen, perhaps being
overlooked or indicating that the bird was not yet in full
adult plumage (see Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
Spotted Kestrel Falco moluccensis
A specimen was collected on Una-una by Menden (Ripley
1941). Birds were observed in twos and threes in beach
forest at Bunawang, Malenge, during late August 1996,
and one was seen on Una-una island on 9 July 2000.
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
This species was found to be relatively common on Una-
una (e.g. three seen during five hours of observations 28
November 1998). In November 1998, good views were
obtained of an individual with a white cheek-patch. The
bird was thus identified as a migrant form, most probably
F. p. calidus, although F. p.japonensis is a remote possibility.
On 9 July 2000, a markedly small individual with a dark
cheek-patch (characters of the resident subspecies, F. p.
emesti) was seen on Una-una island. A villager described
this species at Benteng, Togian island.
LITTLE Grebe Tachybaptus rnficollis
This species was regularly observed in pairs on brackish
ponds at Kadoda and Bunawang, Malenge. The birds
were in breeding plumage during mid- to late August
1996, July 1997, late November 1998 and early May 2001.
It is likely that this species is resident.
Little Egret Egretta garzetta
This species was not found during the present surveys,
but was previously listed by White and Bruce (1986).
Great-billed Heron Ardea swnatrana
Singles were sighted on four occasions in August 1996
along the coast of Malenge. One was an immature,
suggesting the possibility of local breeding. A single was
also seen on mudflats at Baulu, Togian island, on 31
December 1999. On Walea Bahi a single was seen flying
in the intertidal zone in February 2001 (no date recorded) .
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea
A single was seen fishing by a small pond in Kololio village,
Una-una, on 30 and 31 March 2002. Although listed by
Meyer (1879), it was not included in the main text of
Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898), and so the record was
overlooked by White and Bruce (1986). MTD has no
specimen from Togian (S. Eck in litt. 2002), but one of
Meyer’s specimens was registered at ZMB (F. Steinheimer
in litt. 2003). As Meyer collected in 1871, the date of
T 867’ associated with this specimen is obviously an error.
Javan Pond Heron Ardeola speciosa
One was observed on a brackish pond at Popongan,
Malenge, on 16 August 1996.
Little Heron Butorides striata
Birds were seen singly or in twos at three localities on
Malenge in August 1996, two localities on Togian island
in November 1998, on Talatakoh in June 1997 and on
Batudaka in July 2000.
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus
One was observed on a brackish pond at Popongan,
Malenge, on 16 August 1996.
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
15
Woolly-necked Stork Ciconia episcopus
This species was previously listed by White and Bruce
(1986). It was not found during the present surveys,
although it was reported by villagers on Walea Bahi.
[Lesser Frigatebird Fregata arid
Two frigatebirds seen at long distance foraging off the west
coast of Malenge in August 1996 were thought to refer to
this species, as one appeared to have white ‘spurs’ on the
axillaries, but the identification remains unconfirmed.]
RED-BELLIED PITTA Pitta erythrogaster
Individuals were observed twice, both on the forested
slopes of Benteng mountain, Togian island. The call was
frequently heard at this site; it is a mournful whistle and
not as disyllabic as that of Elegant Pitta Pitta elegans.
[Elegant Pitta Pitta elegans
A double note whistle prrrip-prew, presumed to be given
by this species, was heard in wooded areas of Uemata,
Malenge, in August 1 996, and occasionally in June 1 997
and July 2000. Attempts to see the bird were not successful.
Pitta calls can vary (Lambert and Woodcock 1996) and
confirmation of the identification is needed. This species
may move between islands in Wallacea, and this may
explain its possible occurrence.]
Slender-billed Crow Corvus enca
A female specimen is registered at ZMB (20909 B.91 16),
although no specimen can now be found (C. Quaisser in
litt. 2004) . Assuming this is not an error, the lack of records
of this commensal species during the survey is surprising.
White-breasted WooDSWALLOwHmzmws leucorynchus
Two specimens are held by ZMB (F. Steinheimer in litt.
2003; C. Quaisser in litt. 2004). It was not found during
the present surveys.
Ivory-backed Woodswallow Artamus monachus
This species was observed daily in small flocks in habitats
ranging from coastal scrub to hill forest on Togian island
and Malenge.
Black-NAPED Oriole Oriolus chinensis
This species was widespread and common in habitats
ranging from open vegetation to hill forests on all islands
surveyed, except Una-una. Most birds had a pink-red
bill, but some had black bills, suggesting they were
immatures (Coates and Bishop 1997). Individual variation
was noted in the extent of the black eye-band, which
ranges from a patch in front of the eye to a cap extending
to the crown. Similar variation was also noted in the
Banggai islands (Indrawan etal. 1 997) . These observations
call into question the validity of using this character to
define subspecies, and suggest a need for taxonomic
revision (see Dickinson 2004).
PlED CuCKOOSHRIKE Coracina bicolor
Near Threatened. A single observation was made at
Kenari, Walea Bahi, on 22 March 2002, when a pair were
seen foraging close to a male Sulawesi Cicadabird Coracina
morio in mangrove vegetation.
WHITE-RUMPED CUCKOOSHRIKE Coracina leucopygia
A male collected by Meyer is held in ZMB (B.91 00; C.
Quaisser in litt. 2004), but the species was not recorded
during the present surveys. Both Pied and White-rumped
Cuckooshrikes may have been outcompeted by Sulawesi
Cicadabird, although Meyer collected both White-rumped
Cuckooshrike and Sulawesi Cicadabird on Togian island.
Sulawesi Cicadabird Coracina morio
This species was observed in both closed forest and
secondary vegetation on Togian, Talatakoh, Malenge and
Walea Bahi. It was usually observed in flocks of 4-5
individuals. On Togian island it was relatively common
during August 2001, with three flocks seen between
Benteng and Baulu. On Walea Bahi the species was
recorded in March 2002, but not in February 2001,
suggesting the possibility of local movements. White and
Bruce (1986) overlooked Meyer’s record as it was omitted
from the species account in the main text of Meyer and
Wiglesworth (1898). However, ZMB has two of Meyer’s
specimens registered (F. Steinheimer in litt. 2003).
[White-rumped Triller Lalage leucopygialis
A good view was obtained by an Earthwatch volunteer
(R. Hong in litt. 1 997) of what appeared to be a male this
species in secondary forest on T alatakoh on 24 June 1997.
It had a prominent white supercilium (distinguishing it
from White- winged Triller Lalage sueurii ), greyish-white
belly and no white shoulder-patch on the wing. However,
we treat the record as provisional. The separation of L.
leucopygialis from Pied Triller L. nigra was not recognised
by Dickinson (2003).]
Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus
This species was seen daily in all habitats on Togian,
Talatakoh, Malenge and Walea Bahi. One individual
observed on Talatakoh had brown irides, possibly
indicating that it was a juvenile (Vaurie 1949). Birds had
white irides (elsewhere they have red irides), whereas
Sulawesi Drongos D. montanus on the T ogian islands had
red irides. This may suggest that both taxa have co-existed
on Togian for a long time, and the Togian population of
Spangled Drongo may prove to be an undescribed
subspecies.
SULAWESI Drongo Dicrurus montanus
One was observed on the slopes of Benteng mountain,
Togian island, on the morning of 25 July 2001. It had
relatively dull plumage and a strongly forked tail. A female
tending a nest in mangroves was found on Benteng on 27
July 2001.
BLACK-NAPED MONARCH Hypothymis azurea
This species was found to be common, singly or in pairs,
in secondary forest on Batudaka, Togian, Malenge and
Walea Bahi.
Mangrove Blue Flycatcher Cyomis rufigastra
A female was seen briefly (c.30 sec) sallying from a branch
in the subcanopy of secondary vegetation at 50 m on
Benteng, Togian island, on 15 May 2001. The bird was
approximately the size of Black-naped Monarch (which
is common in the area), with a slaty-blue mantle, rufous-
orange underparts, relatively short tail, dark blue head,
rufous-orange supercilium, lores and chin. The dull wash
on the head and upper mantle characteristic of the female
(Coates and Bishop 1997) was not seen. On 29 July 2001,
16
MOCHAMAD INDRAW AN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
a male was observed in secondary vegetation at c.100 m
on the slopes of Benteng. It had a bright indigo-blue
mantle, rusty-ochre breast and belly and black chin.
Togian birds may represent an undescribed subspecies.
Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis
This starling was found to be common in open habitats
on Una-una, Batudaka, Togian and Malenge. The species
roosts communally, and hundreds were reported to roost
on Papan islet, off Malenge.
Sulawesi Myna Basilomis celebensis
Sightings of this species were made on Batudaka,
Talatakoh and Togian, and it was reported on Malenge
(A. Dodoa verbally 2000). On 24 June 1997, an
Earthwatch volunteer (R. Hong in litt. 1997) observed
two birds together in secondary forest on T alatakoh island.
Pairs were seen on 22 and 30 December 1 999 foraging in
a forest clearing and mangrove forest, respectively, at
Benteng, Togian island. A pair was seen foraging in a
coconut grove at T aninkola, Batudaka, on 1 0 May 2001.
It seems likely that the species was previously overlooked
owing to its habit of spending long periods of time inactive
in treetops, and having infrequent or seasonal vocalisations
(soft but clear and melodious piping and whistling,
occasionally with squeaks). Some of the local farmers
interviewed in Benteng, Maelam and Baulu (eastern
Togian) were familiar with the species, noting its crest,
white patches on the side of head and breast, and rich,
melodious call. An older man in Maelam called the bird
'burung jepang’ (= Japanese bird) because it was
apparently not seen until the 1942-1945 Japanese
occupation. It appears to be patchily distributed and
probably rare.
White-necked Myna Streptocitta albicollis
A female specimen is registered at ZMB (B.9115),
although it cannot now be found (C . Quaisser in litt. 2004) .
The species was not recorded during the present surveys.
Meyer (1879) stated that despite problems with the
handling of his collections by his agent, he was confident
in the correctness of the provenance of his collection from
the Togian islands in August 1871 . On this basis, Meyer’s
records have been accepted here, but the possibility of
mislabelling, as suggested by his listing of the cockatoo,
must be considered (see, for example, comments under
Y ellow-sided Flowerpecker Dicaeum aureolimbatum ) . This
is recognised to be a problem with collections dating from
that period (Rasmussen and Prys-Jones 2003). As with
several species whose Togian records are based solely on
A. B. Meyer’s visit in 1871, White-necked Myna may
simply be rare and very local. However, the discovery of
previously unrecorded but closely related species (Sulawesi
Myna in this case) may indicate species turnover and
replacement, or errors among Meyer’s records.
Finch-billed Myna Scissirostrum dubium
This species was found to be moderately common in a
range of habitats from open vegetation to hill forest on
Una-una, Togian, Malenge and Walea Bahi. Having
examined four of Menden’s specimens from Una-una,
Ripley (1941) assigned them to A. dubium pelingense as
described by Neumann in 1939 from Peleng, Banggai
islands, because the birds are larger and slightly darker
than the nominate from mainland Sulawesi. He
commented that while the sample was small, the Togian
specimens showed intermediate characters. White and
Bruce ( 1 986) did not recognise this subspecies, but further
study may be warranted. Two apparently unstudied
Menden specimens from Una-una collected on 5
September 1939 are held at MZB (13077 and 13078).
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica
Meyer’s collection at ZMB apparently listed only Pacific
Swallow H. tahitica (F. Steinheimer in litt. 2003). Meyer
(1879) originally identified all his swallow records as Barn
Swallow, yet listed both species at the end of his paper
and in Meyer and Wiglesworth (1898). No swallows were
collected by Menden (Ripley 1941) and Barn Swallow
was not found during the present surveys It is possible
that all the specimens are actually Pacific Swallow, and
Barn Swallow may need to be removed from the Togian
list, or it may have been overlooked, or it may only be a
rare visitor or vagrant to the Togian islands: further
investigation is needed.
Pacific Swallow Hirundo tahitica
This species was found to be common in all habitats
surveyed, with records from Una-una, Togian, Malenge
and Walea Bahi.
Golden Bulbul Alophoixus ajfinis
On Malenge, a group of four birds was observed in hill
forest at Tanjung on 1 1 June 1997. It was encountered
relatively frequently in groups of up to five birds around
Benteng and Bangkagi, Togian island. On Walea Bahi, it
was relatively common, with groups up to five birds
foraging in secondary forest near the village of Kenari on
20 February 200 1 . The species was often detected through
its repeated nasal single-note call ngaaat, which was uttered
in flight. The species has been recently reinstated in the
genus Thapsinillas (see Dickinson 2003).
[ZlTTING ClSTICOLA Cisticola juncidis
This warbler was listed for Togian by Meyer (1879), but
the record was later found to have been a misidentification
of Bright-headed Cisticola C. exilis by Meyer and
Wiglesworth (1898). White and Bruce (1986)
inadvertently repeated this error.]
Bright-headed Cisticola Cisticola exilis
This species was not found during the present surveys. A
female is registered at ZMB (221 1 0B. 9083), although the
specimen could not be found (C. Quaisser in litt. 2004).
[White-eye Zostemps sp.
A probable new species of white-eye was seen on Batudaka
(Y. Masala in litt. 2003), Togian and Malenge. The bird
is similar to Black-crowned White-Eye Z. atrifrons, but
lacks an eye-ring. One (male?) specimen was collected on
27 July 2003 (MZB 30.366) and further details will be
provided elsewhere.]
Sulawesi Babbler Trichastoma celebense
Birds foraging near ground level, singly or in pairs were
seen and heard frequently in secondary forest, coconut
groves and sago swamps on all islands surveyed, except
Una-una. The holo- and paratypes of this taxon, described
by Voous (1952) as Malacocincla celebense togianense, are
held at ZMA (10327-10329; K. Roselaar in litt. 2004).
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
17
YELLOW-SIDED Flowerpecker Dicaeum aureolimbatum
This species was found to be common in secondary and
closed-canopy forest on all islands except Una-una. Two
active nests were observed in forest-edge on Malenge on
an recorded date in August 1996 and on Talatakoh on 24
June 1997. The nests were pear-shaped, c. 1 5 cm in height
and made of mainly woven dry leaves and/or ‘lalang’
grasses. A male collected by Meyer is registered at ZMB
(23272 B.9086), but no specimen could be found (F.
Steinheimer in litt. 2003, C. Quaisser in litt. 2004).
However, the record was listed as Grey-sided Flowerpecker
D. celebicum by Meyer (1879) and Meyer and Wiglesworth
(1898), and this was repeated in White and Bruce (1986).
Until the actual specimen can be located and examined,
we assume that it is Yellow-sided Flowerpecker, as
apparently indicated on the specimen label.
[Grey-sided Flowerpecker Dicaeum celebicum
Examination of the museum catalogue at ZMB suggests
that Meyer’s specimen was Yellow-sided Flowerpecker
and not this species (see above) . Grey-sided Flowerpecker
was not found during the present surveys, and it is likely
that it does not occur.]
Brown-throated Sunbird Anthreptes malacensis
This sunbird was found to be common in mangroves,
secondary forest and coconut plantations on Togian,
Talatakoh, Malenge and Walea Bahi. A male collected on
Malenge is registered at ZMA (9741; K. Roselaar in litt.
2004).
Black Sunbird Nectarinia aspasia
This species was common in coconut groves, secondary
forest and hill forest on T ogian, Malenge and Walea Bahi.
Dickinson (2003) listed this taxon as Leptocoma sericea.
Olive-backed Sunbird Nectarinia jugularis
This species was very common in all vegetation types and
on all islands surveyed, except'Una-una. Two juveniles
were seen being fed by an adult in secondary vegetation on
20 August 1996, and nest-building was seen in a coconut
grove21 August 1996. Birds were identified as N.j.plateni
by the yellow supercilium and lower ear-covert stripe.
Dickinson (2003) listed the species in the genus Cinnyris.
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus
Small numbers were seen in villages on Una-una, Batudaka,
Togian, Walea Bahi and Papan islet off Malenge.
GREY Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
A single individual was seen foraging along a dry riverbed
on Una-una on 29 March 2002.
Black-faced Munia Lonchura molucca
This species was recorded on Malenge (five in coastal scrub
near the village of Malenge, four near Kadoda), Batudaka
(eight in a mixed garden), Togian (regular in paddyfields at
Benteng), and Walea Bahi (a nest with five eggs found in
scrub at Kenari on 17 February 2001). A previously
overlooked juvenile female specimen collected by Menden
on Malenge is held in ZMA (9744; K. Roselaar in litt. 2004).
BLACK-HEADED Munia Lonchura malacca
Two ofMeyer’s specimen are registered in ZMB (B.9 1 04:
male, B. 9 105: female, specimen not not found; C. Quaisser
in litt. 2004), but the species was not found during the
present surveys.
DISCUSSION
Previous records
Six species previously collected by Meyer (Meyer 1879,
F. Steinheimer in litt. 2003, C. Quaisser in litt. 2004) —
Common Kingfisher, Grey-rumped Treeswift, Purple
Heron, Sulawesi Cicadabird, Yellow-sided Flowerpecker
and Black-faced Munia — were overlooked by White and
Bruce ( 1 986) . We consider previous reports of five species
on the Togian islands to be erroneous: Yellow-crested
Cockatoo, Sulawesi Pygmy Woodpecker, Blue-eared
Kingfisher and Zitting Cisticola and Grey-sided
Flowerpecker (the cockatoo, woodpecker and
flowerpecker were apparently listed in error for Togian;
the kingfisher and cisticola were based on specimen
misidentifications) . Among the species previously reported
that we did not record were several for which we found a
closely related species occupying the same habitat and
guild, e.g. we found Ivory-backed instead of White¬
breasted Woodswallow, Pied instead of White-rumped
Cuckooshrike, and Sulawesi Myna instead of White¬
necked Myna. This suggests misidentification or
mislabelling of specimens, or perhaps species turnover
and replacement. Extensive long-term surveys will be
needed to throw light on these issues
Altitudinal distribution
The highest points in the Togian islands are Mt Colo
(Una-una) and Benteng mountain (Togian island) ate. 400
m and c.500 m respectively. We found no evidence of a
distinct submontane bird community, although various
species were provisionally listed only below certain
altitudinal limits: 200 m for Philippine Scrubfowl, White¬
faced Cuckoo Dove, Sulawesi Hanging Parrot, Bay
Coucal, Collared Kingfisher, Knobbed Hornbill, Red-
bellied Pitta, Black-naped Monarch, Finch-billed Myna;
300 m for Ashy Woodpecker; 400 m for Togian Hawk
Owl; and 500 m for Brahminy Kite, Black-naped Fruit
Dove, Golden Bulbul, Sulawesi Drongo, and Black-naped
Oriole. Two species that are characteristic of higher
elevations elsewhere in their range were recorded down
to sea-level in the Togian islands: White-bellied Imperial
Pigeon and Sulawesi Drongo.
Subspecies
The subspecific identities of some taxa remain to be
determined e.g. Mangrove Blue Flycatcher. In other cases
the subspecies we identified (and which were listed by
Ripley [1941]) differed from those listed by White and
Bruce (1986) e.g. Spotted Kestrel and Brahminy Kite.
These discrepancies may be because of: (1) different
taxonomic treatments; (2) different subspecies ocurring
on different islands; and/or (3) turnover of populations as
they colonise and become extinct over time, a phenomenon
which is common to many small islands found near large
population source areas (e.g. Diamond and LeCroy 1979,
Whittaker 1998).
Endemism
No bird species (and only three subspecies) endemic to
the Togian islands was recognised prior to this study. A
18
MOCHAMAD INDRAWAN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
few other endemic vertebrates have been recognised, e.g.
Togian macaque Macaca togeanus and Togian babirusa
Babyrousa togeanensis (Sody 1949, Becking 1989,
Supriatna eta!. 1996). We found and named the endemic
Togian Hawk Owl (Indrawan and Somadikarta 2004),
and our results indicate that more endemic bird taxa are
likely (including a scops owl and white-eye at the species
level, and possibly Ashy Woodpecker, Bay Coucal, Slaty¬
legged Crake, Sulawesi Drongo, Mangrove Blue
Flycatcher and Finch-billed Myna at the subspecies
level).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The surveys in 1996 and 1997 were supported by Earthwatch (awarded
to YABSHI) and we appreciate the helpful participation of the volunteers,
including Simon Brown, Carolyn Dayman, Dave Hassel, Amy Holland,
Robin Hong, Steve Malone and Tom Slone. We thank Bob Franks and
Reny Juita for skilfully coordinating the YABSHI Earthwatch surveys.
The surveys in 1 998-2000 were funded jointly by the Zoological Society
for the Conservation of Species and Populations, the Oriental Bird Club
and Gibbon Foundation South-East Asia. The surveys from 2000 to
2003 were supported by grants from Keidanren (awarded to YABSHI)
and Nagao Environmental Funds (awarded to MI) . We thank Pak Amir
Dodoa, extraordinary tracker and master storyteller of the T ogian islands,
who provided us with indigenous knowledge and his boundless humour.
We thank our excellent guides Iling Taskir and Burhan. Permission to
examine bird skins was granted by MZB, and we thank Siti Nuramaliati
Prijono, Daryono and Sudaryanti for their continued support and
collaboration. Edward Dickinson kindly assisted with various queries.
John Bates (FMNH), E. Bauernfeind (NMW), Rene Dekker (RMNH),
Siefgried Eck (MTD), Jurgen Fiebig (ZMB), Alison Pirie (MCZ),
Christiane Quaisser (MTD, ZMB), Kees Roselaar (ZMA) and Frank
Stemheimer (ZMB) kindly responded to our queries. Simon Cook,
Jared Diamond, the late Derek Holmes, Djoko T. Iskandar, Ani
Mardiastuti, Yunus Masala, Dewi M. Prawiradilaga and Jim Wardill
kindly provided valuable comments to earlier drafts of the manuscript;
Celia Lowe, Jonathan Riley and the late Ian Thornton also helped with
references. Further support to the project was provided by Andrio
Adiwibowo, Keiko Ando, Kim Burton, Marcus Kohler, Makoto Komoda,
Virginia MacKay, Mellyani Mantiri, Muchamad Muchtar, Leffrendy
Pesik, Willie Smits, Y asuhiko T aki, Roland Wirth and Kazuhiro Y amase.
REFERENCES
Allen, G. R. andMcIvenna, S. A., eds. (2001)H marine rapid assessment
of the Togian and Banggai Islands, Sulawesi, Indonesia. RAP Bulletin
of Biological Assessment 20. Washington, D.C.: Conservation
International.
Becking, J. H. 1989. Henry Jacob Victor Sody (1892-1959), his life and
work: a biographical and bibliographical study. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Beehler, B. M., Pratt, K. and Zimmerman, D. A. (1986) Birds of New
Guinea. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Brown, L. and Amadon, D. (1968) Eagles, hawks and falcons of the
world. London: Country Life Books.
Bruce, M. D. (1990) A reappraisal of species limits in the Pied Imperial
Pigeon Ducula bicolor (Scopoli, 1786) superspecies. Rivista Ital.
Omhhol. 59: 218-222.
Bruce, M. D. (1999) Family Tytonidae (barn-owls). Pp. 34-75. in J.
del Hoyo, A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of
the world. Vol. 5. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds ofWallacea:
Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda islands, Indonesia. Alderley,
Queensland, Australia: Dove Publications.
Diamond, J. M. andLeCroy, M. (1979) Birds ofKarkar andBagabag
Islands, New Guinea. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 164: 467-531.
Dickinson, E. C. (ed.). (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist
of the birds of the world. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Dickinson, E. C. (2004) Systematic notes on Asian birds. 42. A
preliminary review of the Oriolidae. Zool. Verh. 350: 47-63.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
Firman (1996) Note on a survey of the Philippine Megapode Megapodius
cumingii on the Togean islands. Megapode News l. 10(1): 3-4.
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E. and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves: a guide to
the pigeons and doves of the world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica
Press.
Holmes, D. and Phillipps, K. (1996) The birds of Sulawesi. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Indrawan, M., Masala, Y. and Pesik, L. (1997) Recent observations
in the Banggai Islands, Sulawesi. Kukila 9 (1-2): 61-71.
Indrawan, M. and Somadikarta, S. (2004) A new hawk-owl from the
Togian islands, GulfofTomini, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bull.
Brit. Orn. Club 124 (3): 160-171.
Inskipp,T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (199 6) An annotated checklist
of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
Kinnaird, M. F. and O’Brien, T. G. (1993) Preliminary observation on
the breeding biology of the endemic Sulawesi Red-knobbed Hombill
{Rhyticeros cassidix). Trap. Biodiv. 1(2): 107-112.
de Korte, J. (1991) Status and conservation of Indonesia’s seabird
colonies. Pp. 225-247 in J. P. Croxall, ed. Seabirds: status and
conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird
Preservation. (ICBP Technical Publication 11).
Lambert, F. and Woodcock, M. (1996) Pittas, broadbills and asities.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Lowe, C. (1999) Cultures of nature: mobility, identity and biodiversity
conservation in the Togean Islands of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ph.D.
thesis, Yale University, U.S.A.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (1993 ) A field guide to the birds of Borneo,
Sumatra, Java and Bali. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Marks, J. S., Cannings, R. J. and Mikkola, H. (1999) Family Strigidae
(Typical owls) . Pp. 7 6-242 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal,
eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5 . Barcelona, Spain: Lynx
Edicions.
Mees, G. F. (1977) The subspecies of Chlidonias hybridus (Pallas),
their breeding distribution and migrations (Aves, Laridae,
Sterninae). Zool. Verh. 157: 1-64.
Mees, G. F. (1982) Bird records from the Moluccas. Zool. Meded.
56(7): 91-1 1 1
Meyer, A. B. (1879) Field notes on the birds of Celebes. Ibis 4(3): 43-
70, 125-147.
Meyer, A. B. and Wiglesworth, L. W. (1898) The birds of Celebes and
the neighbouring islands. Berlin: Friedlander.
Neumann, O. (1939) A new species and a new race from Peling. Bull.
Brit. Orn Club 59: 47-48.
Owen, D., Bilton, D., Lonsdale, K. and Strathdee, S. (1987) Proyek
Kelelawar: a study of bats and invertebrates in an archipelagos
caves. Oxford University Expedition to the Togian islands, Sulawesi,
Indonesia. Unpublished report.
Peters, J. L. (1937) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 3. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Peters, J. L. (1948) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 6. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
19
*
Mochamad Indrawan, Postgraduate Study Programme, Dept, of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University
of Indonesia, Depok Campus, Depok 16424, Indonesia. Email: jamblang@cbn.net. id
Soekarja Somadikarta, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Indonesia, Depok Campus,
Depok 1 6424, Indonesia. Email: soma30@indo. net. id
Jatna Supriatna, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Studies, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of
Indonesia, Depok Campus, Depok 1 6424, Indonesia.
Murray D. Bruce, P.O. Box 180, Turramurra, NSW 2074, Australia. Email: mdbruce@ozemail.com.au
Sunarto and Guritno Djanubudiman, Jl. Soka III No. 14 Depok 16432, Depok 16421, Indonesia.
APPENDIX 1
Vernacular names ofTogian birds
20
MO C HAMAD INDRAWAN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
APPENDIX 2
List of the birds ofTogian islands
Forktail 22 (2006)
The birds of the Togian islands, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
21
2?
MO C HAMAD INDRAWAN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Menden: recorded by Menden in 1939, as listed in Ripley (1941), Voous (1952), and/or the museum register(s) of specimen records. Location
of specimens indicated where traced.
White and Bruce (1986): x = listed; f = records overlooked.
This study: x = recorded; * = first record for the Togian islands.
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 23-38
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current
distribution and status
LEE KWOK SHING, MICHAEL WAI-NENG LAU, JOHN R. FELLOWES
and CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK
From 1 997 to 2004, a team from Hong Kong and southern China conducted rapid biodiversity surveys in 54 forest areas in the provinces
of Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan. A total of 372 bird species were recorded (201 in Guangdong, 299 in Guangxi and 1 64 in Hainan),
including 12 globally threatened species, 50 China Key Protected Species and 44 species outside their previously recorded ranges.
Breeding was confirmed for 94 species. In total, 232 species (62%) were recorded at five sites or fewer (2-10%). These include species
at the edge of their range, migratory and wintering species inadequately sampled by these surveys, species more characteristic of non¬
forest habitats, and less conspicuous species that were under-recorded, but also rare and localised species. Of particular conservation
concern are the globally threatened White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus , Cabot’s Tragopan Tragopan caboti, Hainan
Partridge Arborophila ardens, White-necklaced Partridge Arborophila gingica , Fairy Pitta Pitta nympha, Pale-capped Pigeon Columba
punicea, Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias brunneata and Gold-fronted FulvettaH/cippe variegaticeps, and other species highly
dependent on the region’s forests, such as Hainan Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron katsumatae , Pale-headed Woodpecker Gecinulus grantia,
Blue-rumped Pitta Pitta soror, Swinhoe’s Minivet Pericrocotus cantonensis and Fujian Niltava Niltava davidi. At most of the sites visited,
the main threat is habitat loss and degradation, especially clearance of natural forest for timber and agriculture; most remaining natural
forests are fragmented and small in size. Poaching for subsistence and trade also affects the distribution and abundance of larger-sized
species such as hawks, pheasants, pigeons and owls. Improved management of the existing protected areas in South China is key to the
conservation of the region’s avifauna. In addition, controlling threats in surrounding areas is also important.
INTRODUCTION
The Chinese provinces of Guangdong, Guangxi and
Hainan together cover an area of 447,200 km2. Their
moist and warm climate provides suitable conditions for
tropical and subtropical forests, and these support c.450
bird species (MacKinnon etal. 1 996). Natural habitats in
this densely populated region have dwindled dramatically,
however, with less than 25% of original forest left by 1992
(MacKinnon et al. 1996) and continued loss and
degradation since then.
The consequences for bird communities have been
poorly documented. Some species, such as Rufous-bellied
Eagle Hieraaetus kienerii, Orange-breasted Green Pigeon
Treron bicincta. Green Imperial Pigeon Ducula aenea , Red¬
breasted Parakeet Psittacula alexandri and Oriental Pied
Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris are reported to have almost
disappeared in the region (Zheng Guangmei and Wang
Qishan 1998). At some sites, e.g. Dayaoshan in Guangxi,
the disappearance of forest bird species owing to habitat
loss has been suspected (Lewthwaite 1996). Formostforest
areas in the region though, very little up-to-date information
is available on the avifauna. This is despite the fact that the
region of Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan covers three
Endemic Bird Areas which are rated as critical priority,
namely Chinese Subtropical Forests, South-east Chinese
Mountains and Hainan (Stattersfield et al. 1998).
In 1 997, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (IvFBG),
Hong Kong, began a series of rapid surveys to update and
improve knowledge of bird distributions in the region, as
part of a program to help minimise the loss of forest
biodiversity in South China. Here we report on the results
of these surveys up to the end of 2004. Subsequent to
these rapid surveys, a series of more in-depth ornithological
surveys have been conducted on Hainan island, which
have led to the rediscovery of Blyth’s Kingfisher Alcedo
Hercules and Pale-capped Pigeon Columba punicea, and an
array of new island records (Chan Bosco Pui Lok et al.
2005, Lee Kwok Shing et al. 2005).
SITES AND METHODS
Fifty-four forest nature reserves and unprotected forest
areas in Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan and south Jiangxi
were visited during 1997-2004 (Table 1, Fig. 1),
predominantly during the warm rainy season. During the
visits, rapid biodiversity surveys were conducted in a range
of terrestrial habitats, with as much time as possible spent
in natural forest. Survey duration varied with the size of
the reserve and constraints of time and access, with 1-7
days of fieldwork in each forest area. During all surveys,
bird records were collated from line transect and fixed-
point observations at vantage points in different habitats,
a combination which has proved effective in maximising
the number of species encountered in a habitat mosaic.
Night surveys were also conducted when camping inside
old-growth forest. IUCN Red List status follows BirdLife
International (2005).
RESULTS
A total of 372 bird species were recorded (201 in
Guangdong, 299 in Guangxi and 164 in Hainan),
including 12 globally threatened species and 50 China
Key Protected Species (three in Class I and 47 in Class
II). Forty-four species were recorded outside their
previously known ranges. The Appendix lists the number
and percentage of sites where each species was recorded,
and indicates the 94 species for which breeding was
confirmed (e.g. birds carrying nesting material, nest¬
building, attending a nest, carrying food or faecal sacs,
nest with eggs, egg-shells or chicks, or juveniles seen).
The annotated list below gives details for threatened and
Near Threatened species, plus those with range extensions.
Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens
Vulnerable. This Hainan endemic species was commonly
heard in good forest at 500-1,400 m at Bawangling,
24
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Table 1. Sites visited during the study (FA = Forest Area, NNR = National Nature Reserve, NR = Nature Reserve). Coordinates were derived
from MacKinnon et al. (1996), apart from site 9 (Zhang Jinquan 1997), 14 (Li Dabiao and Xie Linxiang 2002) and 38 (Zhou Tianfu in litt.
2003). Site numbers correspond to those in Fig. 1.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
25
8-9 Jan 2003
Guizhou
X
■27
X
24
Hunan
25
■20 7
■21 /
X
Guangxi
■26
■28
.34
^ ’ "'X3-637
3-38 "Nanning
r -30
1-39 ,31-29
■40 .4J
VIETNAM
-22
■23
'.13
■14
.j5 Guangdong
A , "Guangzhou
-11 7
is -16 \ 7 N L
17 .12 r* ^4Hong Kong SAR
' p '7 Macau SAR
■1 9 i L-
~lf
N
t
0 100 200 300 400 500km
Figure 1. Map of South China with sites surveyed. Numbers correspond to sites listed in Table 1.
26
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Diaoluoshan, Jianfengling and Nanweiling. Daily counts
of up to 1 1 birds were recorded at Jianfengling National
Nature Reserve in February 2001 .
Mountain Bamboo Partridge Bambusicola fytchii
One was seen in Diding Nature Reserve (850 m) and two
were seen in Nongxin Nature Reserve (750 m), west
Guangxi, on 9 and 12 July 1999 respectively. These are
the first records for Guangxi and an eastern range extension.
CABOT’S Tragopan Tragopan caboti
Vulnerable. Two were seen in Dayaoshan National Nature
Reserve ( 1,800 m), east-central Guangxi, on 22 September
1998. This was the only record during the surveys.
Hainan Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron katsumatae
This Hainan endemic taxon, regarded as an insular race
of the Grey Peacock Pheasant P. bicalcaratum by some
authors (Meyer de Schauensee 1984, Cheng Tso-hsin
1987 and Gao Yuren 1999), was observed in primary
hillside forests (three at 800-1,000 m) in Bawangling
National Nature Reserve in October 2003.
Black-browed Barbet Megalaima oorti
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) stated that this was a rare species
that was found only in Hainan and Yaoshan (an old,
alternative name for Dayaoshan) in Guangxi. Lewthwaite
(1996) recorded the species in four sites in Guangdong,
Guangxi and Jiangxi. During our survey, this species was
found to be fairly common, occurring at 32 sites, from
west Guangxi to south-west Jiangxi, and Hainan. The
Jiangxi record is the first from the province and an eastern
range extension.
Blyth’s Kingfisher Alcedo Hercules
Near Threatened. Two were seen on 26 August 1999,
nine on 8-10 April 2000, seven on 16-17 August 2000
and four on 21-23 July 2001, at Chebaling National
Nature Reserve, north-east Guangdong. Two individuals
were recorded in Huaping National Nature Reserve (at
400 m and 900 m), north-east Guangxi, on 15 and 18
August 1 998. Three were recorded in Jiulianshan National
Nature Reserve (600 m), south-west Jiangxi, on 18-21
August 2000. These were the first records for Guangxi
and Jiangxi. These records help fill a distributional gap
between Guangdong (Lewthwaite 1996) and Yunnan
(Cheng Tso-hsin 1987), and the Jiangxi record is a slight
north-eastern extension of the known range.
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
One was seen in Diaoluoshan Nature Reserve (300 m),
south-east Hainan, on 25 May 1999. In May 2004, a call
heard near a forest streamlet (c.600 m), believed to be of
this species, was recorded in the BawanglingNational Nature
Reserve, west Hainan. One was seen in Shiwandashan
National Nature Reserve, south-west Guangxi bordering
Vietnam, on 1 April 2000. The Guangxi record is the first
for the province and a north-eastern extension of the known
range. This species, considered a very rare resident restricted
to Hainan and southern Yunnan in China (Cheng Tso-hsin
1987), is possibly at risk in the country.
BANDED bay Cuckoo Cacomantis sonneratii
One was seen in Longrui section (290 m) of Nonggang
National Nature Reserve, south-west Guangxi, on 25 May
1998. This was the first record for Guangxi and an eastern
range extension.
Asian Emerald Cuckoo Chrysococcyx macularus
Singles were seen in Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve,
north-west Guangxi, at 1,250 m on 3 August 1999 and at
1,350 m on 25 May 2002. These are the first records for
Guangxi.
Unidentified Swiftlet Collocalia sp.
Unidentified swiftlets were recorded twice: 30 at Mulun
National Nature Reserve (550 m), north Guangxi, on 21
July 1998 and 200 outside a limestone cave (200 m) near
Luokeng Town in Luokeng Nature Reserve, north
Guangdong, on 17 September 2002. No swiftlet species
are confirmed to occur in Guangdong or Guangxi, although
Himalayan Swiftlet C. brevirostris is reported to be ‘rather
widespread in southern China and is the only known
migratory taxon in continental eastern Asia’ (Carey et al.
2001).
Tawny Fish Owl Ketupa flavipes
A bird said to have been caught in a nearby forest was
found in a guesthouse at Maoershan Nature Reserve on
23 August 1998. It was in good health and was released
in the reserve. This is the first record for Guangxi.
Mountain Imperial Pigeon Ducula badia
One was seen at Fusui Nature Reserve (200 m), south¬
west Guangxi, on 28 May 1 998. This is the first record for
Guangxi, and a north-eastern extension of tire known range.
JERDON’S Baza Aviceda jerdoni
One was seen in flight in Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve
(1,450 m), north-west Guangxi, on 1 August 1999. This
is the first record for Guangxi, and a north-eastern extension
of the known range.
White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus
Endangered. One bird was seen at Biannian village
(200 m) near Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve,
south Guangxi, on 30 March 2000. One to two birds
(probably the same individuals on each occasion) were
seen flying above the main stream outside Chebaling
National Nature Reserve (300 m), north-east Guangdong,
on 8-10 August 2000, 8-10 April 2001 and 16-17 August
200 1 . Some of these sightings were not made during the
general surveys but during other visits . Three surveys were
conducted in 2000 and 200 1 to search for the species, but
only these isolated populations were confirmed (Fellowes
etal. 2001, HeFen-Qi etal. in press). Subsequently another
individual was reported from Jiulianshan National Nature
Reserve, Jiangxi (TangPeirong andLiao Chengkai2003).
In addition, on 28 May 1998, we discovered a juvenile
White-eared Night Heron for sale in the Nanning Trade
Market, Guangxi (Lee Kwok Shing 1998). The bird was
purchased, reared until newly Hedged, and released at
Damingshan Nature Reserve after two months.
Fairy Pitta Pitta nympha
Vulnerable. Feathers of this species were found in Huaping
National Nature Reserve (1, 100 m), north-east Guangxi,
on 17 August 1998. One was seen at 1,900 min Dayaoshan
National Nature Reserve, east-central Guangxi, on 21
September 1998.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
27
Maroon Oriole Oriolus traillii
One was seen in Bawangling National Nature Reserve
(1,100 m), west Hainan, on 4 April 1998. Eight were seen
in Diding Nature Reserve (900 m), west Guangxi, on 9
July 1 999. The Guangxi record is the first from the province
and an eastern range extension.
Silver Oriole Oriolus mellianus
Vulnerable. Four were seen in Maoershan Nature Reserve
(1,900 in), north-east Guangxi, on 22 August 1998. In
Nanling National Nature Reserve, north Guangdong,
eight (two adult males and six females or juveniles) were
recorded in Ruyang section (also known as ‘Babaoshan’)
at 1,100-1,200 m on 26-27 June 2000, and one was
recorded in Chengjia section (700 m) on 5 July 2000.
Long-tailed Minivet Pericwcotus ethologus
Day counts of up to 20 were recorded at Cenwanglaoshan
Nature Reserve (1,200-1,600 m), north-west Guangxi,
on 22-29 May 2002. These are the first records for
Guangxi.
Short-billed Minivet Pericrocotus brevirostris
Day counts of up to five were recorded at Diaoluoshan
Nature Reserve (900 m), south-east Hainan, on 23-28
May 1999. These are the first records for Hainan.
Japanese Paradise-flycatcher
Terpsiphone atwcaudata
Near Threatened. Singles were recorded in Wangxia
limestone forest at 140 m on 5 April 1998 and at 500 m
on 6 April 1998 near Bawangling National Nature Reserve,
west Hainan.
Brown-headed Thrush Turdus chrysolaus
One was seen in Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve
(600 m), south Guangxi, on 13 December 2001. This is
the first record for Guangxi.
Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher
Rhinomyias brunneata
Vulnerable. Four (including two juveniles) were seen in
Ruyang section (1,000 m) of Nanling National Nature
Reserve, north Guangdong, on 26 June 2000.
LARGE Niltava Niltava grandis
T en individuals were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan Nature
Reserve (1,250-2,000 m), north-west Guangxi, from 31
July to 3 August 1 999, with six recorded there from 22 to
29 May 2002. These are the first records for Guangxi,
and an eastern range extension.
Blue-throated Flycatcher Cyomis mbeculoides
One was seen in Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve (1,250
m), north-west Guangxi, on 2 1 May 2002. This is the first
record for Guangxi.
WHITE-RUMPED SHAMA Copsychus malabaricus
One was seen in Chunxiu Nature Reserve (400 m), south¬
west Guangxi, on 24 May 1 998. This is the first record for
Guangxi and an eastern range extension.
Blue-fronted Redstart Phoenicurus frontalis
An adult male of this species was seen in Cenwanglaoshan
Nature Reserve (1,300 m), north-west Guangxi, on 31
July 1999. This is the first record for Guangxi, and a
south-eastern range extension.
WHITE-BELLIED REDSTAR T Hodgsonius phaenicumides
Two adult males of this species were recorded in
Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve (1,500 m), north-west
Guangxi, on 1 August 1999. These are the first records
for Guangxi, and a south-eastern range extension.
SLATY-BACKED FORKTAIL Enicurus schistaceus
One was seen in the core area (1,100 m) of Bawangling
National Nature Reserve on 3 April 1 998 and another one
was seen by a stream near Bawangling town (c.400 m) on
5 December 2004. These are the first records for Hainan
(Chan Bosco Pui Lok et al. 2004).
Yellow-billed Nuthatch Sitta solangiae
Near Threatened. This species was not uncommon in good
forest in Hainan (800-1,500 m), and was recorded from
Bawangling, Diaoluoshan, Jianfengling, Jiaxi and
Wuzhishan.
Yellow-cheeked Tit Pams spilonotus
Five were recorded in Bawangling National Nature Reserve
(150 and 1,100 m), west Hainan, on 6 April 1998. This is
the first record for Hainan (Chan Bosco Pui Lok etal. 2004) .
Plain Martin Riparia paludicola
Ten were seen in Maoershan Nature Reserve (1,900 m),
north-east Guangxi, on 22 August 1998. These are the
first records for Guangxi and an eastern range extension.
Dusky Crag Martin Himndo concolor
About 20 individuals were recorded on the river near
Longrui section (160 m) of Nonggang National Nature
Reserve, south-west Guangxi, on 2 5 May 1998. These are
the first records for Guangxi and represent a north-eastern
range extension.
Ashy Bulbul Hemixos flavala
Two were seen in Nonggang section (285 m) of Nonggang
National Nature Reserve, south-west Guangxi, on 20 May
1998. These are the first records for Guangxi, and a north¬
eastern range extension.
RUFESCENT Prinia Prinia mfescens
This species was recorded in Chongzuo, Chunxiu,
Dayaoshan, Fusui, Mulun, Nonggang, Nongxin,
Shiwandashan and Xidamingshan Nature Reserves in
Guangxi, in 1998-200 1 . These records fill a distributional
gap between Guangdong (Lewthwaite 1996) and Y unnan
and Guizhou in south-western China (Cheng Tso-hsin
1987).
Grey-breasted Prinia Prinia hodgsonii
This species was recorded in Cenwanglaoshan, Chongzuo,
Chunxiu, Dawangling, Daxin, Diding, Gulongshan,
Mulun, Nonghua, Nonggang, Nongxin and Qinglongshan
Nature Reserves in west to north Guangxi, in 1998-2002.
These are the first records for Guangxi, and an eastern
range extension.
SLATY-BELLIED TESIA Tesia olivea
Up to six were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan Nature
Reserve ( 1,250-1, 650 m), north-west Guangxi, in August
28
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
1999 and May 2002 and up to four were recorded in
Dawangling Nature Reserve (900-1,100 m), north-west
Guangxi, in August 1999. These are the first records for
Guangxi, and a south-eastern range extension.
Pale-footed Bush Warbler Cettia pallidipes
One was seen singing in Fusui Nature Reserve (200 m),
south-west Guangxi, on 28 May 1998. This is the first
record for Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
Mountain Tailorbird Orthotomus cuculatus
Five were recorded in Bawangling National Nature Reserve
(1,100 m) and Wangxia limestone forest (70 m), west
Hainan, on 6 and 7 April 1998 and five were recorded in
Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve (1,700-1,800 m),
central Hainan, on 1 1 June 1999. These records are the
first for Hainan.
Dark-necked Tailorbird Orthotomus atrogularis
Two were seen in Chunxiu Nature Reserve (400 m), south¬
west Guangxi, on 24 May 1998. This is the first record for
Guangxi, and a north-eastern range extension.
Yellow-streaked Warbler Phylloscopus amiandii
One was seen in Xidamingshan Nature Reserve (600 m),
south-west Guangxi, on 16 October 1998. This is the
first record for Guangxi, and a south-eastern range
extension. The species breeds in central to north-east
China and winters in Yunnan and Guizhou (Cheng Tso-
hsin 1987).
Hainan Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus hainanus
Vulnerable. This species was frequently encountered in
Bawangling, Diaoluoshan, Jianfengling, Jiaxi, Limushan
and Wuzhishan nature reserves in Hainan (800-
1,500 m). The highest count was 30 birds at 1,100 m in
Jianfengling National Nature Reserve on 17 February
2001.
Grey-cheeked Warbler Seicercus poliogenys
Six were recorded in Diding Nature Reserve (900-
1 ,000 m), west Guangxi, on 8-9 July 1 999. These are the
first records for Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
Broad-billed Warbler Tickellia hodgsoni
Day counts of up to four were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan
Nature Reserve (1,320-1,550 m), north-west Guangxi,
on 31 July 1999 and 23 May 2002. These are the first
records for Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
Yellow-bellied Warbler Abroscopus superciliaris
One was seen in Chunxiu Nature Reserve (405 m), south¬
west Guangxi, on 24 May 1 998. This is the first record for
Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
Rusty Laughingthrush Gamdax poecilorhynchus
Two were seen in Maoershan Nature Reserve (1,900 m),
north-east Guangxi, on 22 August 1998. These are the
first records for Guangxi, and a southern range extension.
Long-tailed Wren Babbler Spelaeomis chocolatinus
Four were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve
(1,400-1,600 m), north-west Guangxi, on 22-23 May
2002 . These are the first records for Guangxi, and a south¬
eastern range extension.
Golden Babbler Stachyris chrysaea
One was seen in Chunxiu Nature Reserve (400 m), south¬
west Guangxi, on 24 May 1998. This is the first record for
Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
Striped Tit Babbler Macronous gularis
Fifteen were recorded in Nonggang section (200-300 m)
of Nonggang National Nature Reserve, south-west
Guangxi, on 21-22 May 1998, and two were recorded in
Chunxiu Nature Reserve (400 m), south-west Guangxi,
on 24 May 1998. These are the first records for Guangxi,
and an eastern range extension.
Rufous-winged Fulvetta Alcippe castaneceps
Day counts of up to 1 2 were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan
Nature Reserve (1,300 m), north-west Guangxi, on 31
July and 3 August 1999, and on 25, 26 and 29 May 2002.
These represent the first records for Guangxi, and an
eastern range extension.
Gold-fronted Fulvetta Alcippe variegaticeps
Vulnerable. Twenty were seen in Dayaoshan National
Nature Reserve (1,800 m), east-central Guangxi, on 22
September 1998.
Long-tailed Sibia Heterophasia picaoides
Eight were recorded in Dawangling Nature Reserve (900
m), north-west Guangxi, on 5 August 1999. This is the
first record for Guangxi, and an eastern range extension.
White-collared YvniNAYuhina diademata
Day counts of up to ten were recorded in Cenwanglaoshan
Nature Reserve (1,450-1,800 m), north-west Guangxi,
in August 1999 and May 2002. These are the first records
for Guangxi, and a south-eastern range extension.
Short-tailed Parrotbill Paradoxomis davidianus
Twenty were seen in Sanyue Nature Reserve (600 m), west
Guangdong, on 23 April 200 1 . These are the first records
for Guangdong, and a slight southern range extension.
LITTLE SPIDERHUNTER Araclinothera longirostra
One was seen in the Longrui section (300 m) ofNonggang
National Nature Reserve, south-west Guangxi, on 26 May
1 998. This is the first record for Guangxi, and an eastern
range extension.
Godlewski’s Bunting Emberiza godlewskii
One was seen at Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve
(1,300 m), north-west Guangxi, on 22 May 2002. This is
the first record for Guangxi, and a southern range
extension.
Frequency of detection
Chestnut Bulbul Hemixos castanonotus , Streak-breasted
Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus ruficollis, Grey-cheeked
Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia and Rufous-capped Babbler
Stachyris ntficeps were the most widespread species, each
being recorded in over 70% of the sites visited, including
secondary forests (see Appendix). Forty-eight species were
recorded from 17-38 sites (31-70% of those surveyed).
These species also appear to be quite secure in the region’s
protected areas. They include some species officially under
state protection, such as Crested Serpent Eagle Spilomis
cheela (32 sites), Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
29
(31 sites) and Greater Coucal Centr opus sinensis (27 sites),
and others previously considered restricted, such as Black-
browed Barbet Megalaima oorti (32 sites).
Eighty-seven species were recorded at 6-16 sites (11—
30%), including State Protected species such as Red
Junglefowl Gallus gallus and Mountain Scops Owl Otus
spilocephalus and the globally Vulnerable Hainan Leaf
Warbler Phylloscopus hainanus. These species are probably
not immediately threatened regionally, but their status
should be monitored.
Most species (230) were encountered at five or fewer
sites. These included species from the following groups:
(1) species with ranges that barely overlap with the study
region, and which were only detected in these areas of
overlap, generally at the south-east or north-east limits of
their ranges; (2) species that were inadequately sampled
during our surveys because of the timing: mainly winter
visitors and passage migrants, including some raptors,
thrushes, robins, flycatchers and buntings; (3) species
characteristic of more open habitats, and unlikely to be
highly dependent on the forest areas surveyed, e.g. waders,
egrets, buttonquails and starlings; (4) inconspicuous
species, e.g. night herons, owls, shortwings, bush warblers
and some babblers. The remainder, which are dependent
on South China’s forests in the summer months, appear
to be regionally restricted or rare (see Appendix).
DISCUSSION
The present study and other recent surveys have helped
fill in some gaps in our knowledge of the distribution of
forest birds in South China. Some species are more
widespread than previously recognised; others are
confirmed to be restricted within the region. Although
not comprehensive and limited seasonally, the present
data also allow a better assessment of which species are
regionally at risk.
Some globally threatened species (White-eared Night
Heron, Hainan Partridge, White-necklaced Partridge,
Cabot’s Tragopan, Pale-capped Pigeon, Fairy Pitta,
Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher and Gold-fronted
Fulvetta) are confirmed to be of high conservation concern
in the region. Other species (e.g. Hainan Peacock
Pheasant, Swinhoe’s Minivet, Pale-headed Woodpecker,
Blue-rumped Pitta and Fujian Niltava) are highly
dependent on the region’s forests and are also of high
concern. In particular, Hainan Peacock Pheasant deserves
urgent attention as this species is endemic to Hainan Island
and was recorded at only one site in this survey. These
species should be treated as important even if not on the
State Protected list, which is oriented towards large-bodied
species considered threatened by direct utilisation. Some
species commonly included as high conservation priorities
nationally (e.g. Crested Goshawk, Crested Serpent Eagle
and Greater Coucal) are relatively common and
widespread in the region.
A number of native resident forest species were not
recorded at all during the survey period. Some of these
(e.g. Koklass Pheasant Pucrasia macrolopha , Golden
Pheasant Chrysolophus pictus and Eurasian Nuthatch Sitta
europaea ) are at the edge of their range in South China.
The lack of records of other forest species (e.g. Rufous-
bellied Eagle Hieraaetus kienerii , Pied Falconet Microhierax
melanoleucos, White-necklaced Partridge Arborophila
gingica, Red-breasted Parakeet Psittacula alexandri, Pale-
capped Pigeon Columba punicea, Orange-breasted Green
Pigeon Treron bicincta and Large-tailed Nightjar
Caprimulgus macrurus ) suggests they are extremely
restricted or scarce in the region.
Threats
At most of the sites visited, the survival of the forest bird
fauna was threatened by habitat degradation, particularly
clearance of natural forest for timber and agriculture and
small- to large-scale hydropower stations. This was a
problem even in some protected areas. Some species are
at particular risk from the loss of older trees (with nesting
sites for woodpeckers, owls and hornbills and feeding
microhabitats for many species) and seasonally important
fruiting trees.
The trade in wild birds for food threatens the survival
of some bird species in South China. Pheasants and other
game birds such as Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens
are poached using rifles and snares for both subsistence
and commercial uses (Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
2004). Guns and gunshots were often noted during the
survey. The food trade is thought to have had a significant
impact on the distribution and abundance of large-bodied
species, such as hawks, pigeons, owls and night herons.
V arious owl species were formerly sold in tourist restaurants
at Nankunshan, but by the time of our 1 997 visit we were
told by a restaurateur that wild owls could no longer be
obtained (Fellowes and Hau Chi Hang 1997). Meanwhile,
increasing numbers of captive -bred birds are being sold;
many Common Pheasant Phasianus colchicus and Chukar
Alectoris chukar in the markets are believed to be farm-bred
(Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden 2004).
The cage-bird trade is also a potential threat. The
most popular species seen in South China markets in
2000-2003 were Hwamei Gamdax canorus and Japanese
White-eye Zosterops japonicus (Kadoorie Farm and Botanic
Garden 2004) . Rare species such as Short-tailed Parrotbill
Paradoxomis davidianus are also recorded. To date there
is limited evidence for declines in the most popular species,
and there has been no obvious change in the composition
of species traded (Melville 1 982, Lau Michael Wai-Ning
et al. 1995, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden 2004),
but the Chinese populations of some species e.g. Red¬
breasted Parakeet Psittacula alexandri and Hill Myna
Gracula religiosa have been reduced by the cage-bird trade
(Zheng Guangmei and Wang Qishan 1998, Kadoorie
Farm and Botanic Garden 2004).
Live capture of birds for zoos is an additional threat.
During a visit to Nanning Zoo in Guangxi in 2004, about
30 Oriental Pied Hornbills were seen on display, and staff
reported they were captured in recent years from
Xidamingshan Nature Reserve, which reputedly supports
the largest population of the species in Guangxi. An
estimated 142-184 individuals were left in the wild in
Guangxi in 2000 (Wei Yizhen and Zou Yi 2001). Thus
perhaps one-fifth of the Guangxi population has been
captured for the zoo in recent years. In May 2004, a Hong
Kong ornithologist was offered a specimen of the
Endangered White-eared Night Heron by staff working
at a National Nature Reserve, near one of the species’s
few known populations. This grave situation has been
reported to the provincial authorities, but any institutions
demanding such specimens must share responsibility for
the threat.
30
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Conservation
The results of the present surveys have helped raise
recognition of some of the region’s most important areas
for bird conservation, such as Maoershan, Dayaoshan and
Damingshan in Guangxi, Nanling and Chebaling in
Guangdong, and Bawangling and Jianfenglingin Hainan
(BirdLife International 2003) . The surveys also identified
some areas supporting species or populations of
conservation concern, for example, karst forest in south¬
western Guangxi (e.g. Nonggang, Fusui), the mountain
ranges in north-western Guangxi (e.g. Cenwangloashan
and Dawangling), and tropical forests in Hainan (e.g.
Jiaxi, Limushan).
Improved management of the existing protected areas
in South China is key to conserving the most threatened
of the South China avifauna. There is also a need to
control threats outside nature reserves. The bird fauna in
agricultural and urban areas of South China is very low in
abundance and richness (King and Liao Weiping 1989).
A move towards more ecological farming practices, and
better provision and protection of habitats, is needed to
reverse past declines, and to enable populations to
overcome the effects of isolation and climate change.
In recent years, the number of birdwatchers in China
has been growing, and several birdwatching societies have
been founded, such as those in Fujian and Shenzhen
(WWF China 2004a, b) . Songbirds have long been valued
by the general public in South China. The challenge is to
build on this to promote awareness and support for
conserving wild birds and their habitats.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the Forestry Departments of Guangdong,
Guangxi, Hainan and Jiangxi, for their permission and logistical
help in conducting the surveys. Richard Lewthwaite and Tim
Woodward provided helpful comments on this report. We also
thank Geoff Carey, Billy Hau, Paul Leader, Graham Reels, Keith
Wilson, Zou Fasheng, and the late Gao Yuren and Heinz Hafner
for their help and observations in the field. This work was funded
by KFBG.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2003) Saving Asia’s threatened birds: a guide for
government and civil society. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2005) Species factsheets. Available at
www.birdlife.org/datazone.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L, Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong
SAR: Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.
Chan Bosco Pui Lok, Lee Kwok Shing, Zhang Jian-feng and Su Wen-
ba (2005) Notable bird records from Bawangling National Nature
Reserve, Hainan Island, China. Forktail 21: 33-41.
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
Fellowes, J. R. and Hau Chi Hang (1997) Afaunal survey ofnineforest
reserves in tropical South China, with a review of conservation
priorities in the region. Unpublished report.
Fellowes, J. R., Zhou Fang, Lee Kwok Shing, Hau Billy Chi Hang,
Lau Michael Wei-Ning, Lam Vicky Wing Yee, Young, L. and
Hafner, H. (2001) Status update on White-eared Night Heron
Gorsachius magnificus in South China. Bird Conserv. Intemat. 1 1 :
101-111.
Gao Yuren (1999) Conservation status of endemic Galliformes on
Hainan Island, China. Bird Conserv. Intemat. 9: 411-416.
He Fen-Qi, John R. Fellowes, Chan Bosco Pui Lok, Lee Kwok Shing,
Lin Jian-Sheng, and Michael Wai-Neng Lau (in press) . An update
on the distribution of White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius
magnificus in China. Bird Conserv. Intemat.
IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available
at www.redlist.org.
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (2004) Wild animal trade monitoring
at selected markets in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, South China, 2000-
2003. Hong Kong SAR: Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden.
King, B. and Liao Weiping (1989) Hainan Island bird notes. Hong
Kong Bird Report 1988: 102-110.
Lau Michael Wai-Ning, Ades, G., Goodyer, N. and Zou Fasheng
(1997) Wildlife trade in southern China including Hong Kong and
Macao . Pp . 1 4 1 - 1 49 in Xie Yan, ed . Conserving China ’s biodiversity.
Beijing: Biodiversity Working Group, China Council for
International Cooperation on Environment and Development.
Lee Kwok Shing (1998) White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus
on sale in a Nanning market. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 28: 13.
Lee Kwok Shing, Chan Bosco Pui Lok and Li Shi-ning (2005) Birds
of Yinggeling, Hainan Island, China, with notes on new and
important records. BirdingASIA 4: 68-79.
Lewthwaite, R. W. (1996) Forest birds of south-east China: observations
during 1984-1996. Hong Kong Bird Report 1995: 150-203.
Li Dabiao and Xie Linxiang (2002) Proposal materials for designation
of Sanyue Nature Reserve, Huaiji County. Unpublished report.
(In Chinese.)
MacKinnon, J., Meng Sha, Cheung, C., Carey, G., Zhu Xiang and
Melville, D. (1996) A biodiversity review of China. Hong Kong:
World Wide Fund for Nature China Programme.
MacKinnon, J., Phillipps, K. and He Fen-Qi (2000) A field guide to the
birds of China. U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Melville, D. S. (1982) A preliminary survey of the bird trade in Hong
Kong. Hong Kong Bird Report 1980: 55-102.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird A reas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Tang Peirong and Liao Chengkai (2003) White-eared Night Heron
was found at Jiulianshan Nature Reserve, Jiangxi. China Crane
News 7(1): 34-35.
Wei Yizhen and Zou Yi (2001) Report of territorial vertebrate animal
investigation and monitoring research of Guangxi. Forestry Bureau
of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Unpublished report.
WWF China (2004a) China Bird Watch no. 18. May 2004. Available
at http://www.wwfchina.org/chinabirdwatch/18.htm.
WWF China (2004b) China Bird Watch no. 19. May 2004. Available
at http ://www. wwfchina. org/ chinabirdwatch/ 1 9 .htm .
Zhang Jinquan, ed. (1997) Nature Reserves of Guangdong Province.
Guangzhou: Guangdong T ourism Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
Zheng Guangmei and Wang Qishan (1998) China Red Data Book of
endangered animals: Aves. Beijing: Science Press.
Lee Kwok Shing, Michael Wai-Neng Lau, John R. Fellowes arid Chan Bosco Pui Lok, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
China Programme, Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, N. T. , Hong Kong. Email: scbt@kfbg.org
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
31
32
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
33
34
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
35
36
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forest bird fauna of South China: notes on current distribution and status
37
38
LEE KWOK SHING et a/.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Global Site no. & status
(IUCN China China No. (%) for species
Red List) (RDB) protected of recorded Breeding
Species status status status sites at <5 sites confirmed
Key
Site no. corresponds to those listed in Table 1.
E: only a few (<8) sites surveyed fall within the known range
M: not occurring widely in the survey region during the warm wet season
N: not particularly associated with the forest habitats surveyed
S: secretive and likely to have been under-recorded
R: regionally restricted or rare
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 39-48
Significant bird records and local extinctions in
Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries,
Gujarat, India
PRANAV TRIVEDI andV. C. SONI
We carried out fieldwork in Purna Wildlife Sanctuary and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuary in the fragmented eastern forest belt, Gujarat,
India, between September 1999 and March 2003, and made occasional observations in the area during 1989-2004. We documented
the first records of Brown Wood Owl Strix leptogrammica and Large-tailed Nightjar Caprimulgus macrurus in Gujarat, and recorded six
species new for the reserves and eleven other noteworthy species. We identify eight species that may be locally extinct and 1 4 other species
that may be susceptible to forest loss and degradation owing to their rarity, habitat specificity, foraging guild, body size, endemism, and/
or edge-of-range distribution. Hunting and biotic homogenisation may also be contributing to local avifaunal impoverishment.
INTRODUCTION
Gujarat, the westernmost state of India, owes its rich
avifauna to its diverse range of habitats, geographical
location along the Indus flyway, and tradition of
conservation (Khacher 1996). The diversity of habitats
includes deciduous and thorn forests, grasslands,
wetlands, marine intertidal areas, scrublands and saline
deserts (Singh 2001). The eastern part of Gujarat harbours
about 50% of the state’s forests. These are mainly found
along the four major mountain ranges: the Aravallis, the
Vindhyas, the Satpuras and the Western Ghats. These
forests contain the westernmost moist deciduous forest
patches in the Indian peninsula and they mark the
westernmost limits of several species of forest plants (e.g.
teak Tectona grandis) and animals (e.g. tiger Panthera tigris
and sloth bear Melursus ursinus ) in jjndia. In addition, the
state also includes the easternmost range limits of several
arid and semi-arid zone species (e.g. Asiatic lion Panthera
leo persica ) . Ali ( 1 950) suggested that the Satpura mountain
range has played an important role in the dispersal of
Indomalayan forms to the Western Ghats, a global
biodiversity hotspot. Thus, with respect to Indian
ornithogeography, eastern Gujarat is an important region.
Considering this, relatively few studies have been carried
out to document the avifauna of the region (Table 1).
Large-scale habitat change has taken place since the
survey of Ali (1954-1955), and once-contiguous forests
are today severely fragmented and disturbed by human
activity (Khacher 1996, Singh 2001). For many forest
areas in this region, even basic presence/absence data on
bird species is unavailable. Such gaps in information
hamper the assessment of the status of the forest avifauna
and hinder effective conservation planning. This is
especially true in the light of documented impacts of habitat
loss, fragmentation, degradation and other anthropogenic
factors on forest avifauna across the globe in the past two
decades (e.g. Simberloff 1985, Newton 1995, Laurance
et al. 2002). These impacts do not necessarily affect all
birds equally: several studies have found that certain groups
are more vulnerable than others (see Lindenmayer et al.
2002, Henle etal. 2004 for reviews). Our study was carried
out in part to document the occurrence and abundance
of such sensitive forest bird species to facilitate their
conservation.
STUDY SITES
Intensive studies were carried out at Purna Wildlife
Sanctuary (hereafter Purna) and Ratanmahal Wildlife
Sanctuary (hereafter Ratanmahal). Purna (161 km’) is
located between 20°5 l'N 73°32,E and 2103FN 73°48'E.
It lies in Dangs district, located in the northernmost part
of the Western Ghats biogeographic zone. The Western
Ghats have been identified as a global biodiversity hotspot
and an Endemic Bird Area (Stattersfield etal. 1 998, Myers
et al. 2000). Purna has moist and dry deciduous forests
with bamboo brakes and extensive teak, 'khair’ Acacia
catechu and bamboo Dendrocalamus strictus and Bambusa
Table 1. Avifaunal studies in the eastern forest belt of Gujarat (WLS = Wildlife Sanctuary, NP = National Park).
40
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Forktail 22 (2006)
Jessore Sloth Bear
Sanctuary
Mt Abu
Vijaynagar forest
GUJARAT
Eastern forest belt
Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuary
Gir forest
Puma Wildlife Sanctuary
Vansda National Park
Jambughoda Wildlife Sanctuary
Narmada River
Shoolpaneshwar Wildlife Sanctuary
[Rajpipla forest]
Tapi River
Figure 1. Location of Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India.
arundinacea plantations (Worah 1991). The average
annual rainfall is c.2,100 mm (Anon. 2001). Ratanmahal
is located between 20°32'N 74°03'E and 20°35'N 74° 1 1 'E.
It lies at the confluence of the Vindhya Range and Malwa
Plateau adjoining the state of Madhya Pradesh. With an
average annual precipitation of c. 1,000 mm, it harbours
dry deciduous forests dominated by teak, and some
patches of moist deciduous biotopes with very little or no
teak and with luxuriant bamboo brakes (Singh 2001,
Trivedi 2001). Ratanmahal also has preponderance of
‘mahuwa’ Madhuca indica trees.
Most of the precipitation in these two protected areas
occurs during the south-west monsoon, i . e . , June-October,
with July and August being the rainiest months . The terrain
in both areas is hilly and rugged, with the highest altitude
being 574 m in Purna and 670 m in Ratanmahal. Both
areas are rich in their flora (Bedi 1968, Singh et al. 2002)
and possess high within-habitat heterogeneity (Trivedi
2001,2003). Purna is free from human habitation (except
one village located within the sanctuary), but Ratanmahal
has several villages and their crop-fields within the
sanctuary. Various other human activities, including
moderate-to-heavy livestock grazing, wood cutting,
fuelwood collection, collection of leaves (particularly of
‘tendu’ Diospyros melanoxylon) , and the harvesting of
bamboo and other non-wood forest produce occur in both
sanctuaries, as do poaching and fishing (Singh ex al. 2002,
T rivedi 2003) . Other areas referred to in the text are either
dry deciduous forests with plantations or degraded forests
in the eastern forest belt of Gujarat (see Fig. 1).
Forktail 22 (2006)
Bird records in Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India
41
Habitat loss and fragmentation
The loss, fragmentation and degradation of habitat caused
by humans has been regarded as an important driver of
species extinctions and of the impoverishment of regional
biota. In the eastern forest belt of Gujarat, both
fragmentation and complete loss of forests have been
reported. Singh (2001) estimated that 1,782 km2 of forest
area in Gujarat (c.12% of the current total forest area of
the state) was lost between 1960 and 2000 as a result of
irrigation projects, agriculture, mining, road building,
industry and the legalisation of encroachments. Purna
has a long (c. 100-year) history of systematic forestry
(Worah 1991), whereas Ratanmahal has remained
virtually free of intensive forestry practices (Singh et al.
2002) . Worah (1991) reported a patchy distribution of
forests in Dangs district (in which Purna is located), with
a mean patch size of 28 km2. She regarded these forests
as ‘fragmented’ owing to presence of several teak and
bamboo monocultures, many of which were fairly young.
Organised forestry has opened up the forests of Purna
and surrounding regions through roads and associated
anthropogenic disturbances. This has also led to habitat
fragmentation. In Dangs district, selective felling between
the late nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries eliminated
large trees. Between the 1960s and 1980s, several forest
patches were clear-felled and converted into teak
monocultures (Anon. 2001). Forestry operations of
thinning and climber-cutting removed lianas as well as
several species of low timber value associated with teak
(Anon. 2001). This has changed the composition and
structure of several forest patches, especially in accessible
areas. Tree felling was stopped with a moratorium in
1987-1988 (Anon. 2001). However, the harvesting of
bamboo on a large scale continues even today (Trivedi
2003) . The habitat at Purna thus consists of a mosaic of
plantations (mainly of teak) of various ages, secondary
forests, and few patches of primary moist and dry
deciduous forest. Worah (1991) and Singh et al. (2000)
reported local extinctions of several mammals from Dangs
district, including Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica
dealbata, tiger, gaur Bos gaums, smooth-coated otter Lutra
perspicillata and sloth bear.
METHODS
In total, 70 days were spent in the field at the two sanctuaries
(38 at Purna and 32 at Ratanmahal) during all seasons
between September 1999 and March 2003. To prepare
inventories of bird species we carried out extensive surveys
over all terrain and vegetation types within the two
sanctuaries. Line transects (without distance estimation)
and intensive birdwatching along existing trails were used
to obtain information on encounter rates, status and habitat
use. For nocturnal species, we noted calls at selected
locations by keeping vigil on 3-4 nights in each sanctuary
in the dry seasons (winter and summer). Ten transects in
Purna and five in Ratanmahal (varying in length from 1 to
3.5 km) were walked. We undertook 64 such walks,
covering a total sampling distance of 83 km. The status of
birds was determined based both on their encounter rates
(individuals/km) on transects and on general observations
throughout the study period. After calculating the
encounter rates for each species on each transect, mean
encounter rates for each species were derived by averaging
these. Thus, sample sizes for mean encounter rates were
ten and five for Purna and Ratanmahal respectively. We
supplemented our data with information gathered by PT
between 1989 and 2004 through intensive birdwatching
in the eastern forest belt. Information from the field was
supplemented by secondary data collected through
interviews with local residents and a survey of the literature.
T o assess changes in the status of forest birds over time
at Purna, we used two past data sets: Ah (1954-1955) and
Worah (1991). There have been no previous surveys at
Ratanmahal, so a detailed assessment of avifaunal changes
here was not possible. Instead, we depended on secondary
information collected from local residents and on previous
observations made by PT during 1989-1991 .Tomaximise
our chances of detecting rare species, we searched
intensively in all habitats and searched specifically for such
species. We categorised the distribution (widespread or
patchy) and nature of habitat occupancy (forest-interior,
edge, open area, etc.) for species using Ali ( 1969), Worah
(1991) and Grimmett et al. (1998). Feeding guilds were
assigned based on the literature (Ali 1969, Grimmett etal.
1998, Raol 1998) as well as our observations in the field.
Bird species susceptible to forest alteration and loss were
identified primarily based on rarity (mean encounter rates
<0.5 individual/km) and habitat specificity (forest-interior
species and species preferring moist deciduous forest).
This information was compared with published literature
documenting susceptible taxa in the Oriental region (e.g.
Johns 1 986, Worah 1991, Mitra and Sheldon 1993, Raman
1995, Datta 2000, Castelletta et al. 2000, Raman 2001).
RESULTS
A total of 1 9 1 species were recorded at the two sanctuaries:
139 at Purna and 147 at Ratanmahal.
New records for Gujarat
Two species, Large-tailed Nightjar Caprimulgus macmrus
and Brown Wood Owl Strix leptogrammica, were recorded
for the first time from the state. Neither species was
recorded by earlier surveys or listed in checklists for Gujarat
(All 1954-1955, Khacher 1996, ZSI 2000, Khacher and
Raol undated).
BROWN Wood OWL Strix leptogrammica
This species was seen at Purna in moist deciduous forest
consisting of teak, Adina cordifolia, Terminalia crenulata
and extensive brakes of Bambusa amndinacea (Trivedi
2003) . Three daytime sightings were obtained at Dhulda,
Bardipada range, on 22 March 2002 (one sighting) and
30 April 2002 (two sightings). Two sightings involved a
pair (presumably the same pair), while the third was of a
solitary individual. The pair was found perched in a
bamboo clump and, when disturbed, flew a short distance
within the middle storey and settled at a low height. The
absence of concentric barring on the facial disks and the
dark coloration clearly distinguished this species from the
congeneric Mottled Wood Owl 5. ocellata. Ali and Ripley
(1983) described the distribution of the species as ‘dense
moist deciduous to semi-evergreen and evergreen biotopes
at suitable locations throughout the country’, while
Grimmett et al. (1998) described it as inhabiting the
Himalayas, north-east India, Eastern and Western Ghats.
Its northernmost record in the Western Ghats is from the
42
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Forktail 22 (2006)
Sanjay Gandhi National Park (Mumbai), Maharashtra
(Prasad 2003). Thus our record is a northerly extension
of the known range of this species by over 150 km.
Large-tailed Nightjar Caprimulgus macmrus
During surveys for nocturnal birds at Ratanmahal, a
distinct chaunk...chaunk... call was heard on the plateau
at the Ratanmahal temple near the Gujarat-Madhya
Pradesh border at 19h00-19h30on3and 17 March 2000.
Based on the frequency of notes as well as on their long-
drawn nature as compared with the chunk... chunk...
call of the Grey Nightjar C. indicus, these calls were
identified as belonging to the Large-tailed Nightjar. No
visual observations were made. The closest prior records
are by D’Abreu (1935), who described this species as
breeding in densely shaded ravines of the former Central
Provinces (presently Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh
states), and by Grimmett et al. (1998) from eastern
Madhya Pradesh. Our record at Ratanmahal extends the
known range of the species considerably to the west.
New records for Purna and Ratanmahal
BLACK Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
This species was sighted twice (on 20 August 2001 and
22 December 2001) at Purna (the first records for this
site) and was also seen at Jambughoda Wildlife Sanctuary
(hereafter Jambughoda) in January 2002, 2003, 2004 and
2005. The species was identified by its characteristic
upward-angled primaries in flight, dark coloration, yellow
cere and feet and, most notably, its behaviour of gliding
low over the forest canopy. In Gujarat, this species has
been reported from Jambughoda forest (Ali 1954-1955)
and Gir forest (Dharmakumarsinhji 1985). In
neighbouring states, Mashru (2004) recorded it from Mt
Abu in Rajasthan and D’Abreu (1935) reported it from
Madhya Pradesh.
Ashy Woodswallow Artamus fuscus
We found c.10 individuals of this species at Ratanmahal
on 1 0 September 2000. They were perched on telegraph
wires and an adjacent tree while making aerial sallies to
hawk insects. This species was notrecorded by Ali (1954-
1955) from Gujarat, but Ivhacher (1996) reported a
sighting from the Rajpipla area (Narmada district, Satpura
mountain range) and Worah (1991) recorded it in the
Dangs district. Our record extends the known range of
the species by c.75 km north.
Greater Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus
This species was sighted 24 times (involving 29
individuals) in January, March, April, May, July and
December at Ratanmahal and on 40 occasions (involving
58 individuals) in January, February, March, April, June
and December at Purna. The mean encounter rate of the
species was 0.97 birds/km (SD=0.83) at Ratanmahal and
0.91 birds/km (SD=0.69) at Purna. It was found to be a
sentinel species (and possibly an ‘active-nuclear’ species)
in mixed-species flocks at both Ratanmahal and Purna,
and it probably plays a key role in such flocks. Ali (1954-
1955) reported this species to be common in bamboo and
mixed deciduous forests south of the Narmada river, while
Monga and Naoroji (1983) and Desai et al. (1993)
recorded it from Rajpipla forests (now Shoolpaneshwar
Wildlife Sanctuary), south of the Narmada. Ratanmahal
appears to be the northernmost limit of this species in
India and possibly the westernmost boundary of its global
range.
BLUE-CAPPED ROCK Thrush Monticola cinclorhynchus
We recorded three sightings (of single individuals) of this
species: one in Purna (22 March 2002) and two in
Ratanmahal (on the plateau at the Ratanmahal temple
near the Gujarat-Madhya Pradesh border on 19 and 30
January 2000) . These were the first records at Ratanmahal.
At Purna the species was not sighted on transects, while
at Ratanmahal, it was sighted on one transect once, with
a mean encounter rate of 0.03 birds/km (SD=0.08). All
three birds were in dense bamboo brakes in moist
deciduous forest. The species is reported to overwinter
mainly in the Western Ghats (Grimmett et al. 1 998) and
in Gujarat it has been reported from Hingolgadh (Khacher
1996), Rajpipla forests (Monga and Naoroji 1983) and
Dangs district (singly or in pairs in very small numbers
during February and March: Ah 1954-1955).
Orange-headed Thrush Zoothera citrina
At Ratanmahal, two sightings of this species were made:
two individuals on a transect on 23 July 2000 (Trivedi
2001) and one on 22 July 2000, while at Purna it was
sighted on nine occasions (involving 1 1 individuals) on
two transects during June of 2002. The mean encounter
rate was 0.07 birds/km (SD=0.15) at Ratanmahal and
0. 19birds/km (SD=0.40) atPuma. The race was identified
as Z. c. cyanotus based on the presence of two vertical
black stripes across the white ear-coverts and throat. In
Gujarat, the species has been reported previously only
from south of the Narmada river (Monga and Naoroji
1983, Ali 1954-1955). Our records from Ratanmahal
extend its known range to c.75 km north of the Narmada
river. The species appears to be a summer visitor and
possibly breeds at both sites.
Crimson Sunbird Aethopyga siparaja
This species was sighted at Purna and Ratanmahal, and
was fairly common in teak and mixed moist forest with
Bambusa arundinacea. Five sightings (involving seven
individuals) were made at Ratanmahal and 29 sightings
(involving 42 individuals) were made at Purna. The mean
encounter rate was 0.23 birds/km (SD = 0.34) at
Ratanmahal and 0.74 birds/km (SD=0.94) at Purna. The
race observed at both sanctuaries was A. s. vigorsii of the
Western Ghats. In Gujarat, Ali (1954-1955) recorded
the species south of river Narmada at Rajpipla forest. It
has also been reported from Shoolpaneshwar Sanctuary
in Narmada district (Monga and Naoroji 1983, Desai et
al. 1993). Our records at Ratanmahal extend its known
range by about 7 5 km and the site is the northernmost for
the species in Gujarat.
Noteworthy species
Here we give details of 1 1 species, most of which are
forest-interior species (based on Worah 1991) and show
a documented vulnerability to forest fragmentation and
alteration.
Grey Junglefowl Callus sonneratii
This galliform was heard in Purna at only two localities,
but was seen as well as heard on four occasions (involving
eight birds) in Ratanmahal. It appears to have been
Forktail 22 (2006)
Bird records in Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India
43
persecuted beyond recovery in many areas of its former
distribution (e.g. Jessore Sloth Bear Sanctuary: Trivedi
2005). Pheasants have been found to be sensitive to
changes in forest composition (Johns 1 986, Castelletta et
al. 2000, Datta 2000) as well as hunting. Hunting may be
a particular problem for this species as ground-dwelling
birds are vulnerable to passive methods of trapping, and
this species depends on concealment rather than flight for
escape.
Rufous Woodpecker Celeus brachyurus
This woodpecker was encountered only at Purna, where
it was uncommon and appeared to be partial to bamboo
brakes in moist deciduous forest. It was reported previously
from Dangs district and Vansda National Park (Ali 1954-
1955, Worah 1991, Bhatt 2004), but not elsewhere from
Gujarat; hence Purna appears to be the north-westerly
limit of its distribution. The species is peculiar in its habit
of nesting in the nests of Crematogaster ants (Ah 1969).
White-bellied Woodpecker Dryocopus javensis
We recorded the species three times in Purna at two
localities. Purna is the northernmost site for the species in
India and the westernmost limit of its global range. This
population of White-bellied Woodpecker is isolated, with
the nearest neighbouring population at a distance of
c. 350 km in Melghat Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra (Prasad
2003). The largest woodpecker of peninsular India, this
is a bird of primary moist deciduous forest and secondary
forest and is also seen in tropical evergreen and semi¬
evergreen forests (Ali and Ripley 1983, Grimmett et al.
1998). In Gujarat, it was reported earlier from Dangs
district and adjoining areas of Navsari district (Ali 1 954-
1955, Worah 1991, Singh et al. 2000, Santharam 2003).
In the Western Ghats of Maharashtra, the species is
extremely rare and has a fragmented distribution (Prasad
2003). Furthermore, its preferred habitat, primary moist
deciduous forest, is rare in Gujarat, having been replaced
by either secondary forests or plantations (Worah 1991,
Santharam 2003). This has resulted in a reduced
availability of suitable nesting trees (Santharam 2003).
Ali (1954-1955) reported that this species was hunted by
tribal people in Dangs district. These factors suggest that
the species may be susceptible to local extinction. A similar
conclusion was reached for the species in Singapore, where
only one pair was found surviving after the loss of a large
area of rainforest (Castelletta et al. 2000).
Heart-spotted Woodpecker Hemidrcus canente
This species was recorded on transects on four occasions
(involving seven individuals) in Purna (mean encounter
rate: 0.11 birds/km, SD=0.23), where it was confined to
moist deciduous forest with bamboo. It has been reported
from the same localities in Gujarat as White-bellied
Woodpecker, with additional records further north from
Rajpipla forests (Monga and Naoroji 1983). Santharam
(1995) described it as a specialist based on its foraging
mode. Prasad (2003) considered it rare in western
Maharashtra.
Lesser Yellownape Picus chlorophus
This was a rare species, being sighted on only four
occasions at three localities in Purna. It was reported
earlier by Ali (1954-1955) and Worah (199 1) from Dangs
district and from Vansda National Park (Bhatt 2004) and
inhabits moist deciduous forests with bamboo (Trivedi
2003). There are no records of the species from other
parts of Gujarat. In western Maharashtra, the species is
rare with a restricted range (Prasad 2003).
White-cheeked Barbet Megalaima viridis
The occurrence of this species was confirmed on only one
occasion in Purna based on its call. This represents the
northernmost extent of the distribution of this Western
Ghats endemic. The congeneric Brown-headed Barbet
M. zeylanica was common at Ratanmahal and Purna.
MALABAR Trogon Harpactes fasciatus
This species was sighted only in Purna at three localities.
While Ali (1954-1955) reported it to be ‘fairly common’
in Dangs district, we considered it to be uncommon. All
( 1954-1955) mentioned one of the locations of the species
as Ajwa (in present day Vadodara district), situated more
than 150 km north-west of the Dangs district. This appears
to be a typographical error with ‘Ajwa ’ being printed instead
of ‘Ahwa’ (the capital of Dangs district). We suspect this
because, although a record at Ajwa would be unusual and
noteworthy, Ali (1954-1955) does not refer to this locality
or emphasise the importance of this record in his
annotations to the sites where this species was collected.
Malabar Trogon has also been reported from Vansda
National Park (Singh et al. 2000). It is found in moist
deciduous forest with bamboo and secondary growth (Ali
1954-1955). The species has been found sensitive to forest
fragmentation and alteration in the southern Western
Ghats in India (Raman 200 1 ) as have congeners elsewhere
in the Orient (e.g. Johns 1986, Castelletta et al. 2000).
CRESTED Treeswift Hemiprocne coronata
This species was sighted only in Purna (only off transects)
and Ratanmahal (eight sightings including 30 individuals
on transects) . Its mean encounter rate at Ratanmahal was
0.86 individuals/km (SD=1.83). Ali (1954-1955)
encountered it only in Rajpipla forests (see also Monga
and Naoroji 1983) and Dangs district. It has also been
reported from the Gir forest (Khacher 1996). We found
it in forest with Lannea coromandelica, Boswellia serrata
and Anogeissus latifolia on boulder-studded dry hills.
Crested Treeswift may be sensitive to forest loss and
degradation, as Castelletta etal. (2000) recorded the local
extinction of the congeneric Whiskered Treeswift H.
comata in Singapore.
Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike Hemipus picatus
A rare resident, this species was seen only once on transects
(23 June 2002) in Bhenskatri range in Purna. Both Ali
(1954-1955) and Worah (1991) reported the species
earlier from Dangs district, but Singh et al. (2000) did not
record it from the nearby Vansda National Park. It is
easily overlooked owing to its rarity, inconspicuous
coloration and small size. Prasad (2003) reported it as an
uncommon, localised resident in western Maharashtra,
while placing it among the species affected by loss of
forests. Johns (1986) and Castelletta et al. (2000) also
regarded the genus Hemipus to be sensitive to forest
degradation.
Malabar Whistling Thrush Myophonus horsfieldii
This species was sighted only once, on 24 December 200 1
on a stream bank in moist deciduous forest at Purna.
44
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Forktail 22 (2006)
Although it is known for its melodious song, we never
heard it during the study period. Ali (1954-1 955) recorded
it as resident in Dangs district, but not common. It is a
terrestrial omnivore, known to forage along streams for a
variety of invertebrates, including aquatic insects (Ali
1969). Its rarity could conceivably have resulted from
changes in hydrology caused by the building of check-
dams, perhaps affecting prey availability.
WHITE-RUMPED SHAMA Copsychus itialabaricus
We saw this species only at Purna where it was confined
to moist deciduous forest and bamboo patches, and was
usually seen rummaging among leaf-litter in search of
insects. It was previously reported in Dangs district by Ali
(1954-1955) and Worah (1991) and from Vansda
National Park by Singh etal. (2000), but not elsewhere in
Gujarat. It has a patchy distribution in India (Grimmett
etal. 1 998), and belongs to the terrestrial insectivore guild,
which is susceptible to forest fragmentation (Raman 2001).
Species susceptible to habitat loss and degradation
We used encounter rates and information from the
literature and from personal observations on the habitat
specificity of species to identify those that we considered
likely to be susceptible to forest loss and degradation at
the two sanctuaries. At Purna, we found 64 species that
had a mean encounter rate of <0.5 individuals/km, while
at Ratanmahal there were 47 such species (with 28 of
these occurring at both sites). Of the total of 83 rarely
encountered species, we excluded 53 widespread species
(including raptors) and 17 migrants. The remaining 13
species comprised Grey Junglefowl, Rufous Woodpecker,
Heart-spotted Woodpecker, Lesser Yellownape, White¬
cheeked Barbet, Indian Grey Hornbill Ocyceros birostris,
Malabar Trogon, Black Eagle, Bar-winged Flycatcher-
shrike, White-throated Fantail Rhipidura albicollis, White-
rumped Shama, Velvet-fronted Nuthatch Sitta frontalis
and Black-lored Tit Pams xanthogenys. Although Indian
Peafowl Pavo cristatus is widespread in India, it was
Table 2. Possible local extinctions of birds in Puma and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries.
* = endemic to India
Guild: AFO = Arboreal frugivore-omnivore; AFR = Arboreal frugivore; BF = Bark-forager; C = Carnivore; AQC = Aquatic carnivore; FGI =
Foliage-gleaning insectivore; FSI = Foliage-sallying insectivore; GFI = Ground-foraging insectivore; GFO = Ground-foraging omnivore;
HI = Hawking insectivore
Occurrence: f = locally extinct (see Table 2)
Forktail 22 (2006)
Bird records in Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India
45
considered to be susceptible owing to its rarity at the two
sites and vulnerability to hunting. Two additional species
that were only encountered off transects, White-bellied
Woodpecker and Malabar Whistling Thrush, were also
considered susceptible. Further, we suspect the local
extinction of four of these species, plus an additional four
species, based on an absence of sightings during our study:
six from Purna and two from Ratanmahal (Table 2).
Finally, we also included Brown Wood Owl and Large¬
tailed Nightjar, as susceptible to forest alteration owing to
their rarity and habitat specificity (see Ali 1 969) . In all, we
identified 22 species as likely to be ‘susceptible’ to forest
degradation and loss at the two study sites (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Inferences about local extinctions require that sufficient
effort be expended in searching for species. The species
discovery curves obtained for Purna and Ratanmahal
(Fig. 2) reached asymptotes roughly at the eleventh visit.
At Purna, the four species added on the last two visits
included three nocturnal species (two owls and one
nightjar) recorded after intensive night monitoring.
These two graphs suggest that our sampling effort was
adequate, although it is almost impossible to record all
species owing to the dynamic nature of forest avifaunas
(Johns 1986).
We identified 22 species that we considered to be likely
to be susceptible to habitat change (Table 3). The status
of most of these has changed from ‘common’ or ‘not
uncommon’ to rare or locally extinct. For one species,
Stork-billed Kingfisher Halcyon capensis, there has been
no recent record from any part of Gujarat. The six species
that appeared to be extinct at Purna were seen by Ali
(1954-1955) but not by Worah (1991), supporting our
conclusion. Others, like Large Woodshrike Tephrodomis
gularis, Black-lored Tit, Stork-billed Kingfisher, White-
throated Fantail and Indian Grey Hornbill, are known to
be vocal and conspicuous, so these are also likely to be
genuinely extinct now at these sites.
Nineteen of the 22 susceptible species are
characteristically forest-interior species . Such species show
reduced fecundity near forest edges and their populations
decline as fragment sizes reduce unless immigration from
larger forest patches occurs (Temple and Cary 1988).
T erborgh etal. (1990) recognised two types of rarity among
birds in the Amazon rainforests of Peru: species that were
locally rare (i.e. in the surveyed locality or habitat) and
species that were constitutively rare. They considered the
latter as truly rare and vulnerable to human intervention;
these included large birds with low population densities
(< 1 pair/km2) such as raptors, parrots, woodpeckers and
a few other species that were among the largest members
of their respective guilds. In our study, the White-bellied
Figure 2. Bird species discovery curves for Purna and Ratanmahal
Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India.
Table 4. Abundance of species susceptible to forest loss and degradation remaining extant in Purna Wildlife Sanctuary.
•■Relative abundance based on point counts (number of birds in highest count divided by total number of points)
bNumber of individuals of each species divided by number of individuals of all species recorded on transects (n=10 transects)
cMean±SD individuals/km (n=10 transects)
*species not detected on transects
46
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Forktail 22 (2006)
Woodpecker as well as some other woodpeckers (see
Tables 3 and 4) and the Stork-billed Kingfisher showed
the latter kind of rarity, whereas the other susceptible
species were locally rare. The replacement of primary
moist deciduous forest either by secondary forest or by
plantations at Purna has led to fragmentation of the habitat
(Worah 1991, Santharam 2003) and is a likely reason for
the reduced abundance of such species in this sanctuary
(Worah 1991).
Other ecological traits were associated with some of
the species we identified as susceptible. These were
ground-foraging and bark-foraging guilds, large body size,
endemism and edge-of-range distribution. As suggested
by Henle et al. (2004), these traits probably operate
synergistically.
Ground-foraging (six species) and bark-foraging
guilds (five species) represented 50% of the susceptible
species. These two guilds constituted only 19% (36
species) of the 191 species recorded in either sanctuary.
Ground- and bark-foraging guilds were thus significantly
more likely to be susceptible (x: = 1 5.77, df= 1, P<0.001).
Ground-foraging birds have been found susceptible to
forest fragmentation in the southern Western Ghats
(Raman 2001), and bark-foraging birds are known to be
susceptible to changes in micro-climate and foraging
substrate resulting from logging (Johns 1986), forest
loss and fragmentation (Castelletta et al. 2000, Raman
2001).
Stork-billed Kingfisher is likely to be susceptible on
account of its large body size. Ali (1954-1955) regarded
it as ‘not uncommon on forest streams’ in the eastern
forest belt of the state. However, Khacher (1996) called
for a special investigation to ascertain its status in relation
to the limnological changes which have taken place in
forest streams. The species presumably feeds on relatively
large fish as is suggested by its much larger bill (84-93
mm long) and body size compared with the congeneric
White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smymensis (bill length:
60-67 mm) (Ali 1954-1955). We suspect that degradation
of the lotic ecosystems by siltation (Khacher 1 996), over¬
fishing and construction of check-dams has adversely
affected the availability of the size and/or species of fish
favoured by Stork-billed Kingfisher. In addition,
competition with the White-throated Kingfisher, a
widespread, open-area species with a varied diet (Khacher
1996) that has colonised Purna in recent years, could also
have affected its abundance.
Gaston (1985), Daniels etal. (1990) and Raman (2001)
showed that endemic bird species in the Indian peninsula
and Western Ghats were more vulnerable to habitat loss
than non-endemic species. In the Atlantic forest fragments
of Brazil, Ribon et al. (2003) found that endemic species
were more likely to go locally extinct than non-endemics.
A total of 23 species (12% of those recorded in either
sanctuary) were endemic to the Indian subcontinent. Of
the 22 susceptible species, nine (41%; Table 3) were
subcontinent endemics, which is significantly higher than
expected (%; = 19.56, df=l, P<0.001).
Populations found at the peripheries of a species’s
distributional range tend to occur at lower densities
(Hengeveld and Haeck 1982) and hence be more
vulnerable to extinction (Lawton 1 995) than those in the
core parts of its distribution. Of the 22 susceptible species
we identified, 14 have their westernmost distributional
limits in Gujarat’s eastern forest belt (see Grimmett et al.
1998). The species for which Purna marks the northern,
western or north-western distributional limit are Large
Woodshrike, White-bellied Woodpecker, Rufous
Woodpecker, Lesser Yellownape, Brown Wood Owl,
MalabarTrogon and White-cheeked Barbet. Ratanmahal
is probably the northernmost distributional limit for
Velvet-fronted Nuthatch and westernmost boundary for
Large-tailed Nightjar. It is notable that Large Woodshrike
was also reported locally extinct in Singapore (Castelletta
et al. 2000), which is near its southernmost range limit.
Poaching may also influence forest avifaunas
(Castelletta et al. 2000, Henle et al. 2004). For example,
phasianids are popular game birds and have been hunted
to extinction from several areas in Gujarat (Trivedi 2005,
personal observations). The effect of hunting on Indian
Peafowl is particularly clear. In most parts of Gujarat,
where there is a taboo against hunting this species, it is
common, occurring in very high abundance at Gir forest
(Trivedi 1993) and in several human-inhabited areas.
However, in the region populated by tribal groups where
Ratanmahal and Purna are located, there is no hunting
taboo and the species is extremely rare (Trivedi 2001,
2003).
Forest fragmentation is another possible cause of
avifaunal impoverishment, and may act synergistically
with anthropogenic activities such as hunting and
logging (Laurance et al. 2002). We encountered eight
widespread species at Purna that are known to favour
edges or open areas (Ali 1954-1955, Grimmett etal. 1998),
but were not recorded by earlier studies: Barred
Buttonquail Tumix suscitator, Common Hoopoe Upupa
epops. Black-headed Cuckooshrike Coracina melanoptera ,
Common Myna Acridotheres tristis, White-browed Fantail
Rhipidura aureola , Purple-rumped Sunbird Nectarinia
zeylonica , Spotted OwrletAthene brama and White-throated
Kingfisher. Colonisation by these species has possibly
been facilitated by the road-building and habitat
degradation that accompanied forestry operations (also
see Johns 1986). Whether these species have played a
role in the impoverishment of the forest avifauna could
not be ascertained, although instances of edge-tolerant
or edge-favouring competitor species causing a decline
of forest-interior or rare species have been reported
elsewhere (see Harris 1988, Laurance et al. 2002, Henle
et al. 2004).
CONCLUSIONS
Gujarat’s forest avifauna is in a fragile situation. While
intensive surveys are adding species to the state’s checklist,
there are indications of avifaunal impoverishment and
local extinctions. Ratanmahal and Purna are among the
last remaining patches of moist deciduous forest in Gujarat
and hence mark the global distributional limits for several
forest birds. As a result of past forestry operations, the
habitat at Purna is more fragmented than that at
Ratanmahal, and this has a bearing on future avifaunal
impoverishment and conservation. The situation is made
worse by the increased isolation of bird populations in
forest patches. Intensive surveys should be carried out in
all forested regions of the state, including existing and
potential forest corridors. Studies on the ecology of
susceptible forest birds and the impacts of anthropogenic
activities also need to be undertaken.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Bird records in Purna and Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuaries, Gujarat, India
47
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The studies at Ratanmahal and Purna Wildlife Sanctuaries were part
of the biodiversity studies carried out by GEER Foundation,
Gandhinagar. We thank the former director El. S. Singh and the present
director C. N. Pandey for their support and co-operation. Bivash Pandav
and T. R. S. Raman helped with procuring literature. The latter also
read the final draft critically and gave many useful and pertinent
suggestions. Niraj Joshi commented on the first draft and made relevant
suggestions. Mohan Iyer, Jigish Mehta, Chinmay Shukla and Sangeetha
Trivedi helped in data collection at various stages during the study.
The observations at Jambughoda were made with support from the
late Mihir Dave. PT would like to thank: R. Vyas for advice, providing
reprints and for critically reading the manuscript; Sangeetha Trivedi
for editing the earlier drafts; Gautam Trivedi for computer facilities;
and Jigish Mehta for help in preparing the map. Local assistants Andra,
Bipin and Gambhir were indispensable . The comments and suggestions
of an anonymous reviewer improved the manuscript considerably.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. (1950) The Gujarat Satpuras in Indian ornithogeography: the
highway of Malayan forms to the Western Ghats. Prakrixi 9: 9-23.
Ali, S. (1954-1955) The birds of Gujarat I and II. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 52: 374-458, 735-802.
Ali, S. (1969) Birds of Kerala. Second edition of the birds of Travancore
and Cochin. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. (1983)21 pictorial guide to the birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Anonymous (2001) Management Plan of Purna Wildlife Sanctuary
(2002-201 1): Vols. I- II. Ahmedabad: Forest Department, Gujarat
State.
Bedi, S. J. (1968) Floristic study of Ratan Mahal and surrounding
hills. Ph.D. thesis, M. S. University, Baroda, India.
Bhatt, M. (2004) [Bird-watching in Vansda National Park.] Vihang
21: 9-10. (In Gujarati.)
Castelletta, M., Sodhi, N. S. and Subaraj, R. (2000) Heavy extinctions
of forest avifauna in Singapore: lessons for biodiversity conservation
in Southeast Asia. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1870-1880.
D’Abreu, E. A. (1935) A list of the birds of the Central Provinces. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 38: 95-116.
Daniels, R. J. R., Hegde, M. and Gadgil, M. (1990) Birds of the man¬
made ecosystems: the plantations. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim.
Sci.) 99(1): 79-89.
Datta, A. (2000) Pheasant abundance in selectively logged and unlogged
forests of western Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 97: 177-183.
Desai, I. V., Suresh, B. and Pilo, B. (1993) Birds of Shoolpaneshwar
Wildlife Sanctuary. Pavo 31: 55-72.
Dharmakumarsinhji, K. S. (1985) The Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
Temm. and Laug. at Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 82: 655.
Gaston, A. J. (1985) Is habitat destruction in India and Pakistan
beginning to affect the status of endemic passerine birds? J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 81: 636-641.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
Subcontinent. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Harris, L. D. (1988) Edge effects and conservation of biodiversity.
Conserv. Biol. 2: 330-332.
Hengeveld, R. and Haeck, J. (1982) The distribution of abundance. I.
Measurements. J. Biogeog. 9: 303-316.
Henle, K., Davies, K. F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C. and Settele, J.
(2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiv.
Conserv. 13: 207-251.
Johns, A. D. (1986) Effects of selective logging on the ecological
organization of a peninsular Malaysian rainforest avifauna. Forktail
1: 65-79.
Khacher, L. (1996) The birds of Gujarat - a Salim Ali centenary year
overview. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 93(3): 331-373.
Khacher, L. and Raol, L. M. (undated) [Checklist of birds of Gujarat.]
Compilation based on separate accounts serially published in
Chatak, the newsletter ofWWF-India. Baroda: Gujarat State Office.
(In Gujarati.)
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M.,
Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O.,
Laurance, S. G. and Sampaio, E. (2002) Ecosystem decay of
Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv. Biol.
16: 605-618.
Lawton, J. H. (1995) Population dynamic principles. Pp. 147-163 in
J. H. Lawton and R. M. May, eds. Extinction rates. Oxford, U.K.:
Oxford University Press.
Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Donnelly, C. F., Nix, H. and
Lindenmayer, B. D. (2002) Effects of forest fragmentation on bird
assemblages in a novel landscape context. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 1-18.
Mashru, A. (2004) [Black Eagle in Mount Abu, Rajasthan.] Vihang
22: 5-6. (In Gujarati.)
Mitra, S. S. and Sheldon, F. H. (1993) Use of an exotic tree plantation
by Bornean lowland forest birds. Auk 1 10: 529-540.
Monga, S. G. and Naoroji, R. K. (1983) Birds of the Rajpipla Forest
- South Gujarat. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 80: 575-612.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A.
B. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation
priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
Newton, I. (1995) The contribution of some recent research on birds
to ecological understanding. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 675-696.
Prasad, A. (2003) Annotated checklist of the birds of western
Maharashtra. Buceros 8: 1-174.
Raman,T. R. S. (1995) Shifting cultivation and conservation of tropical
forest bird communities in Mizoram, northeast India. M.Sc.
dissertation, Saurashtra University, Dehradun, India.
Raman, T. R. S. (2001) Community ecology and conservation of
tropical rainforest birds in the southern Western Ghats, India.
Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Raol, L. M. (1998) Van upvanna pankhi [Birds of forest and garden],
Ahmedabad, India: Centre for Environment Education. (In
Gujarati.)
Ribon, R., Simon, J. E. and De Mattos, G. T. (2003) Bird extinctions
in Atlantic forest fragments of the Vicosa region, southeastern
Brazil. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1827-1839.
Santharam, V. (1995) Ecology of sympatric woodpecker species of
Western Ghats, India. Ph.D. thesis, Pondicherry University, India.
Santharam, V. (2003) Distribution, ecology and conservation of the
White-bellied Woodpecker Dryocopus javensis in the Western Ghats,
India. Forktail 19: 31-38.
Simberloff, D. (1985) Habitat fragmentation and population extinction
of birds. Ibis 137: S105-S1 1 1 .
Singh, H. S. (2001) Natural heritage of Gujarat (forests and wildlife).
Gandhinagar, India: GEER Foundation.
Singh, H. S., Patel, B. H., Trivedi, P., Raval, B. R., Pawar, J. S., Vyas,
R. and Patel, B. H. (2002) Biodiversity study in Ratanmahals Wildlife
Sanctuary (a comprehensive ecological and socio-economic study).
Gandhinagar, India: GEER Foundation.
Singh, H. S., Raval, B. R., Patel, B. H., Tatu, K., Patel, D., Vyas, R.
and Patel, B. H. (2000) Biodiversity study on Vansda National Park.
A comprehensive ecological and socio-economic study. Gandhinagar,
India: GEER Foundation.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
48
PRANAV TRIVEDI and V. C. SONI
Forktail 22 (2006)
Temple, S. A. and Cary, J. R. (1988) Modeling dynamics of habitat-
interior bird populations in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol.
2: 340-347.
Terborgh, J. W., Robinson, S. K., Parker, T. A., Munn, C. A. and
Pierpont, N. (1990) Structure and organization of an Amazonian
forest bird community. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 213-238.
Trivedi, P. (1993) Habitat selection by Indian Peafowl ( Pavo cristatus
Linn.) in Girforest, Gujarat, India. M.Sc. dissertation, Saurashtra
University, Dehradun, India.
Trivedi, P. (2001) Biodiversity study: Ratanmahal Wildlife Sanctuary.
Bird study interim report II. Unpublished report. Gandhinagar,
India: GEER Foundation.
Trivedi, P. (2003) Bird study of Purna Wildlife Sanctuary, Dangs
under biodiversity study of Purna Wildlife Sanctuary. Unpublished
final report. Gandhinagar, India: GEER Foundation.
Trivedi, P. (2005) Avifauna study of Jessore Wildlife Sanctuary.
Unpublished final report Gandhinagar, India: GEER Foundation.
Worah, S. (1991) The ecology and management of a fragmented forest
in south Gujarat India: the Dangs. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Poona, Pune, India.
ZSI (2000) State fauna series 8: fauna of Gujarat, pan- 1: Aves. Calcutta,
India: Zoological Survey of India.
Pranav Trivedi, ‘ Green Path’, 13, Sukomal Apts, Rarndevnagar, Ahmedabad 380 015, India; and Nature Conservation
Foundation, Mysore, India. Email: tpranav70@yahoo.com
Vinod C. Soni, Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot 360 005, India.
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 49-56
Incidental wetland bird observations from
Attapu and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR,
March-June 2005
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
During incidental bird observations at four sites in South and Central Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Xe Pian National Protected
Area, Bung Pulone/Bung Khe wetlands, Xe Champon wetlands and Bung Hor) in March-June 2005, I recorded 91 species (excluding
taxa identified to genus only), including Green Peafowl Pavo muticus (Vulnerable) and 3 Near Threatened species: Lesser Fish Eagle
Ichthyophaga humilis. Darter Anhinga melanogaster and Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola.
INTRODUCTION
During a programme of national crocodile surveys in 2005
(Bezuijen et al. 2005), I recorded incidental observations
of birds during March-June (the late dry season and early
wet season) in four wetland sites in Lao People’s
Democratic Republic (hereafter ‘Laos’). Published
information on the avifauna of these sites was collected 8-
55 years previously. Visits to each site were brief (0.5-5
days/site). IUCN Red List categories (Vulnerable, Near
Threatened etc.) follow BirdLife International (2005).
Nationally threatened species are listed as ‘At Risk in Laos’,
‘Potentially At Risk in Laos’ or ‘Little Known in Laos’
(Duckworth etal. 1 999b) . The spelling of site names follows
the Service Geograpliique d’Etat (1:200,000) topographic
map series for Laos (Appendix 1 ) and largely accords with
Thewlis et al. (1996, 1998). Site names are given in full,
i.e. including the Laos prefix for river (‘xe’), pond (‘nong’),
lake (‘bung’), swamp (‘kout’) or village (‘ban’).
STUDY SITES
Two sites were visited each in South and Central Laos
(sensu King et al. 1975, Duckworth et al. 1999a) (Fig. 1).
In Xe Pian National Protected Area (NPA), observations
were made along the Xe Pian river from the Xe Pian/Xe
Kong confluence to Ban Mai village (75 km), the Xe
Figure 1 . Map of Xe Pian NPA (shaded area) *=Darter sighting; triangle=seasonal fishing camp; solid circle=swamp; solid square+triangle=village.
Inset shows wetland sites visited in March-June 2005; 1: Xe Pian NPA; 2: Bung Pulone/Bung Khe; 3: Xe Champon wetlands; 4: Bung Hor.
50
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
*NPA = National Protected Area
Khampho river from the Xe Pian/Xe Khampho confluence
to Ban Nongkhe village ( 1 2 km), and Nong Palu, a 1 .9 ha
seasonal lake that was dry at the time of visit (Table 1).
The Xe Pian and Xe Khampho are 20-50 m wide, slow-
flowing with scattered sandbars, and fringed by little-
degraded evergreen and deciduous forest and bamboo
stands. During the visit, river levels were relatively low
(0.5-3 m deep) and 3-10 m of banks was exposed. The
second site was the Bung Pulone/Bung Khe complex, a
series of >5 permanent and seasonal lakes (including
Bung Pulone, Bung Khe, Nong Kham Miern, Nong Hoi
and Nong Koung Hape) 1.6-35 ha in size, with open
water or thickly vegetated surfaces, within dry dipterocarp
forest. These lakes are located on the Xe Pian
floodplain, outside the north-east border of Xe Pian NPA.
Bung Pulone and Bung Khe were 2-3 m deep at the time
of visit.
The third site was the Xe Champhon wetlands,
comprising part of the Xe Champhon river and several
(>5) permanent and seasonal lakes/ponds (including Kout
Mark Peo, Kout Tao, Kout Xe Hat and Kout Phinoy,
0.5-1 1 ha in size and 0.5-4 m deep), and one artificial
lake (Bung Cheo, 67 ha). Here the Xe Champhon river
is 1 5-20 m wide with sandy, steeply sloping banks and, at
the time of visit, was reduced to a series of non-flowing
pools 0 . 5- 1 m deep . This site was within a rural landscape
of degraded secondary forest, shrubland and bamboo,
rice fields, burnt and cleared land, and with extensive
invasion of the exotic weed Mimosa pigra. The fourth
site was Bung Hor, a permanent, 40 ha lake located on
the Xe Bangfai river floodplain, and which was 1.5 m
deep at the time of visit, with an open (unvegetated)
surface. Banks were largely cleared of native vegetation
and supported rice terraces, with the nearest forest over
300 m away.
In all sites, bird observations were made
opportunistically, often during brief walks in the mornings
(06h00-08h00 hours) and afternoons (16h00-18h00).
Bung Hor was only visited for three hours. In Xe Pian
NPA, river travel was by motorised boat, which almost
certainly reduced detectability of some birds, compared
with a paddled boat.
RESULTS
Bird species observed during site visits are listed in
Appendix 2. Records are detailed below for species that
are globally or nationally threatened, or for which the
current records provide new information on their status
or distribution in Laos.
In Xe Pian NPA, various bird surveys were conducted
from 1992-1993, 1995, 1996, 2000 and 2001 (Thewlis
et al. 1996, 1998, Duckworth et al. 1998b, Evans et ah
2000, M.K. Poulsen in lilt. 2005). Of potential
conservation concern, the current visit failed to record
some threatened species recorded along the same or nearby
river sections in previous dry seasons, e.g. Masked Finfoot
Heliopais personata, River Tern Sterna aurantia, Lesser
Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis , Purple Heron Ardea
purpurea , White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni and
vultures. Efforts were made in the current visit to scan all
sandbars, where River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii may
be easily observed (Duckworth et al. 1998a), but none
was recorded. Similarly, in March 1 993, Nong Palu was
partially grazed/ trampled by domestic buffalo, but retained
tall reedbeds and shrubs, and a roosting colony of 50
unidentified weavers (Thewlis etal. 1996). In the current
visit, the lake was entirely trampled and grazed by domestic
buffalo, retained only a low (<0.5 m) cover of grasses, and
no weavers were observed. It is possible that some riverine
species were present but not recorded, owing to the loud
engine noise of the survey boat and/or low survey effort in
the current visit.
For the Bung Pulone/Bung Khe lakes, previous bird
records were from a two-day visit in 1997 (Davenport et
al. 1997). Wetlands 35 km to the west were surveyed for
birds in 1992-1993 (Timmins et al. 1993). For the Xe
Champhon wetlands, the most recent documented bird
records were by David-Beaulieu (1949-1950), who in
the 1940s surveyed and recorded 318 bird species in the
lower catchment of the Xe Banghiang river (of which the
Xe Champhon is a tributary). The presence of globally
threatened bird species in the 1940s (David-Beaulieu
1949-1950), and sighting of an unidentified cormorant
in the current visit (below) warrant new bird surveys in
this region. At Bung Hor, no detailed bird surveys have
yet been conducted; the site and nearby wetlands were
visited several times by Baird (2001), who reported large
flocks of ducks.
SIGNIFICANT RECORDS
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus
Vulnerable; At Risk in Laos. Train plumes (from recently
hunted specimens) were observed in Xe Pian NPA on 1
June, at a border police post (Xe Kong/Xe Pian confluence)
and a fishing camp (Xe Pian/Xe Khampho confluence)
near a 1995 record (Evans and Timmins 1996). At the
Bung Pulone/Bung Khe site, residents of Ban Pindon
(Fig. 1 ) stated this species is opportunistically hunted for
local consumption and that groups of 3-5 individuals are
‘commonly seen’. Three were heard calling here on 30
January 1997 (Davenport et al. 1997). Eastern Xe Pian
NPA is one of several nationally important sites for this
species, which is widely hunted for food (Evans and
Timmins 1996, Evans etal. 2000).
Forktail 22 (2006) Wetland bird observations from Attapu and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR
51
Lesser Whistling-duck Dendrocygna javanica
This species was observed in all survey sites. A flock of
1,700 at Bung Hor on 17 March is perhaps the largest
documented flock to date in Laos (see Duckworth et al.
1999a). The ‘large’ numbers of ducks here in 2001 were
attributed to strict community regulations on hunting
(Baird 2001). A flock of 250 individuals was observed at
the Bung Pulone/Bung Khe site (4 April); in 1 992-1993,
flocks of 150-450+ were observed at wetlands 35 km to
the west (Timmins et al. 1993). The size, congregatory
habits and attachment to wetlands of this species all
indicate it could be at risk from hunting, and a clearer
understanding of its national conservation status is
warranted.
Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhyncha
Nine seen at Bung Hor on 17 March, and 1-3 individuals/
day recorded at the Xe Champhon wetlands on 14-16
March are the first records in Central Laos (see Evans et
al. 2000).
Duck sp.
A silhouetted duck seen at the Xe Pian/Xe Khampho
confluence on 2 June seemed larger than Lesser Whistling
or Spot-billed Duck, and may have been a White-winged
Duck Cairina scutulata. Breeding populations of this
globally Endangered species were observed in the park
during 1992-1995 (Evans et al. 1997).
Stork-billed Kingfisher Halycon capensis
This species was observed daily along the Xe Pian and Xe
Khampho rivers. One was recorded at the Bung Pulone/
Bung Khe site on 3 April. Although this species has not
previously been listed of national conservation concern,
there is recent evidence for widespread declines in the last
decade in North and north-central Laos (Timmins and
Robichaud 2005, Fuchs et al. in prep.).
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis
Two were recorded along the Xe Pian river on 2-3 June.
The many previous records from South Laos were from
August-April, and the species was considered a non¬
breeding winter migrant (Thewlis et al. 1996). The current
records may indicate some individuals are resident in Laos,
as proposed for North Laos by David-Beaulieu (1944).
Red-breasted Parakeet Psittacula alexandri
Up to three individuals/day were observed regularly at all
sites except Bung Hor. The species was previously
common at survey sites in and near Xe Pian NPA and in
Savannakhet Province (Thewlis et al. 1996, Robichaud
1998). The distribution and abundance of this species
appear to have declined in Laos (Duckworth etal. 1999a).
Lesser Fish Eagle lchthyophaga humilis
Near Threatened; At Risk (Laos) . One adult was seen at
Bung Pulone on 4 April; this is within the region of South
Laos identified as nationally important for this declining
species by Thewlis et al. (1998).
Darter Anhinga melanogaster
Near Threatened; At Risk in Laos. Seven were counted
along 75 km of the Xe Pian river on 31 May and 1 June,
five of them between the Xe Pian/Xe Kong and Xe Pian/
Xe Khampho confluences (18 km) (Fig. 1). This reach
was wider and deeper than upstream from the Xe Pian/Xe
Kong confluence, but otherwise appeared similar in
habitat. No Darters were recorded along the Xe Khampho,
which is narrower and shallower than the Xe Pian. There
are previous April-May records in this region, in 1995
and 1998 (Thewlis et al. 1998, Duckworth etal. 1999a),
and local reports from the Xe Kong (Fig. 1) in December
1997 (Robichaud 1998). Local communities in Xe Pian
NPA reported that they sometimes consume Darters,
which were historically resident in Laos; recent records
suggest the species has declined significantly and is now
a non-breeding visitor (Thewlis et al. 1998).
Cormorant Phalacrocorax sp.
One silhouetted cormorant was seen at Bung Cheo (Xe
Champhon wetlands) on 1 5 March. Little Cormorant P.
niger occurred in this region in the 1940s (David-Beaulieu
1949-1950), and the only recent published Lao records
are from South Laos in 1996 (Evans et al. 2000). Great
Cormorant P. carbo has never been recorded in Central
and South Laos, but is likely to occur at least occasionally
given the large numbers in parts of inland Cambodia (e.g.
Goes and Chamnan 2002).
Great Egret Casmerodius albus
One was seen in Xe Pian NPA on 31 May-4 June. The
seasonal status of egrets in Laos is unclear; they are thought
to be winter visitors/passage migrants, with no historical
evidence or current indication of nesting in Laos by any
species (Duckworth et al. 2002), although Little Egrets
were recorded during the summer in the 1 960s and 1 980s
in North Laos by W. W. Thomas (Duckworth and Tizard
2003).
Woolly-necked Stork Ciconia episcopus
At Risk in Laos. One was seen along the Xe Pian river on
31 May. None was seen at the Bung Pulone/Bung Khe
site, although seven were observed here on 30 January
1997 (Davenport et al. 1997). Xe Pian NPA is a national
stronghold for this species, which is highly threatened in
Laos by hunting (Duckworth et al. 1999a).
Black-and-red Broadbill
Cymbirhynchus macrorhynchos
One was seen leaving a nest along the Xe Pian river on 4
June. The nest was suspended at the end of a bamboo
stem, 5 m above the river. This species was common in
previous surveys in Xe Pian NPA, but has a very restricted
national distribution (Thewlis et al. 1998).
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos
Up to five individuals/day were recorded along the Xe
Pian and Xe Khampho rivers and at Bung Pulone/Bung
Khe wetlands. None was recorded at the Xe Champhon
wetlands and Bung Hor, although this species was
historically abundant in Savannakhet province (David-
Beaulieu 1949-1950). Its current status in South and
Central Laos is unclear, but it may be in decline, as in
North Laos (Duckworth et al. 2002).
Blue-throated Flycatcher Cyomis rubeculoides
Clear views were obtained of an adult Cyomis flycatcher
with an entirely dark blue-black throat, in semi-evergreen
forest along the Xe Pian river on 3 June. This apparently
constitutes the second Laos record of a dark-throated
52
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
form of Blue-throated Flycatcher (after one in 1998 in
Central Laos: P. Davidson in Duckworth et al. 1999a).
This may refer to C. r. dialilaema, a resident in north-east
Thailand (Robson 2000).
Fujian/Rufous-bellied Niltava
Niltava davidit sundara
N. davidi : Potentially at Risk in Laos. Clear views were
obtained of a male niltava in semi-evergreen forest along
the Xe Pian river on 2 June. For either Fujian or Rufous-
bellied Niltava, this record is unusual for being in summer
and in a lowland area, and is among the few records for
South Laos (Duckworth et al. 1999a).
Black-collared Starling Stumus nigricollis
Up to four individuals/day were seen at Ban Phonesaat
(Xe Pian NPA), Bung Pulone/Bung Ivhe lakes and Xe
Champhon wetlands (Fig. 1). This species was historically
abundant in Savannakhet province (David-Beaulieu
1 949-1950), where its current status is unclear but it may
be in decline, as in North Laos (Duckworth et al. 2002,
Duckworth and Tizard 2003, Fuchs et al. in prep.).
White-vented Myna Acridotheres cinereus
Up to four mdividuals/day were recorded in the Bung
Pulone/Bung Khe lakes and Xe Champhon wetlands.
This species was historically abundant in Savannakhet
province (David-Beaulieu 1949-1950), where its current
status is unclear but it may be in decline, as in North Laos,
where it has declined greatly (Duckworth et al. 2002,
Duckworth and Tizard 2003, Fuchs et al. in prep.).
Yellow- vented Bulbul Pycnonotus goiavier
Several seen at Ban Phonesaat on 3 June appear to
represent the fifth record for Laos. The first two records
were in nearby Champasak province in 1996, and two
were recorded at Don Som island in August 1997
(Cunningham 1998, Evans et al. 2000, Evans 2001,
Robson 2005).
House Sparrow Passer domesticus
Four in the Xe Champhon wetlands on 16 March
constitute the first published record for Central Laos,
and the first non-urban Lao record. The species is a recent
colonist to Laos (Duckworth et al. 1999a).
Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola
Near Threatened. A flock of 400 individuals was seen at
Bung Cheo (Xe Champhon wetlands) on 1 3 March. This
is one of the largest flocks recorded recently in Laos (see
Duckworth et al. 2000, Duckworth and Tizard 2003).
‘Very large’ flocks were previously recorded in this region
of Savannakhet province in the 1940s (David-Beaulieu
1949-1950). A flock of 80 was observed in the north
region of Xe Pian NPA in December 1992 (T. D. Evans
verbally 2005).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
These observations were made during a crocodile survey project funded
by the Government of Lao PDR, Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity
Conservation and Sustainable Use Program (MWBP) and the Wildlife
Conservation Society Lao Program. The MWBP is a joint program of
the four nations of the Lower Mekong Basin (Cambodia, Lao PDR,
Thailand and Vietnam), managed by the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP), IUCN and Mekong River Commission (MRC).
The MWBP is funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF),
UNDP, The Royal Netherlands Government, MRC and Water and
Nature Initiative (WANI). Akchousanh Rasphone and Chris Hallam
(WCS Lao) prepared the map. I sincerely thank Will Duckworth, Tom
Evans, Arlyne Johnson, Peter-John Meynell, Michael Poulsen and an
anonymous reviewer for critical comments on an earlier draft.
REFERENCES
Baird, I. G. (2001) The protected crocodiles, wetlands and forests at
Ban Beung Boua Thong and Ban Nao Neua, Xiabouli District,
Savannakhet Province, South Lao PDR. Crocodile Specialist Group
Newsletter 20(2): 22-23.
Bezuijen, M.R., Phothithay, C. Hedemark, M. and Chanrya, S. (2005)
Preliminary status review of the Siamese Crocodile ( Crocodylus
siamensis Schneider, 1801) (Reptilia: Crocodylia) in the Lao
People’s Democratic Republic. Vientiane: Living Aquatic Resources
Research Centre (Government of Lao PDR), Wildlife Conservation
Society & Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and
Sustainable Use Programme.
BirdLife International (2005) Species factsheets. Available at
www.birdlife.org/datazone.
Cunningham, P. (1998) Rhone island bird observation report.
Vientiane: unpublished report to CESVI and CPAWM.
Davenport, D., Tizard, R. and Phommavongsa, V. (1997)Trip report:
Ban Mai. Vientiane: Wildlife Conservation Society.
David-Beaulieu, A. (1944) Les oiseaux du Tranninh. Hanoi: Universite
Indochinoise.
David-Beaulieu, A. (1949-1950) Les oiseaux de la province de
Savannakhet (Bas-Laos). Oiseau et R.F.O. 19: 41-84, 153-194
and 20: 9-50.
Duckworth, J. W., Davidson, P., Evans, T. D., Round, P. D. and
Timmins, R. J. (2002) Bird records from Laos, principally the
Upper Lao/Thai Mekong and Xiangkhouang province, in 1998-
2000. Forktail 18: 11-44.
Duckworth, J. W., Davidson, P. and Timmins, R. J. (1999a) Birds.
Pp. 69- 1 60 in J. W. Duckworth, R. E. Salter and K. Khounboline,
compilers. Wildlife in Lao PDR. 1999 Status Report. Vientiane:
IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Wildlife Conservation
Society & Centre for Protected Areas and Watershed Management.
Duckworth, J. W., Salter, R. E. and Khounboline, K., compilers (1999b)
Wildlife in Lao PDR. 1999 Status Report. Vientiane: IUCN-The
World Conservation Union, Wildlife Conservation Society & Centre
for Protected Areas and Watershed Management.
Duckworth, | W., Timmins, R. J. and Evans, T. D. (1998a) The
conservation status of the River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii in
South Laos. Biol. Conserv. 84: 215-222.
Duckworth, J. W. and Tizard, R. J. (2003) W. W. Thomas’s bird
records from Laos, principally Vientiane, 1966-1968 and 1981—
1983. Forktail 19: 63-84.
Duckworth, J. W., Tizard, R. J., Timmins, R. J., Thewlis, R. M.,
Robichaud, W. G. and Evans, T. D. (1998b) Bird records from
Laos, October 1994-August 1995. Forktail 13: 33-68.
Evans, T. D. (2001) Ornithological records from Savannakhet province,
Lao PDR, January-July 1997. Forktail 17: 21-28.
Evans, T. D. and Timmins, R. J. (1996) The status of the Green
Peafowl Pavo muticus in Laos. Forktail 11:1 1-32.
Evans, T. D., Robichaud, W. G. and Tizard, R. J. (1997) The White¬
winged Duck Cairina scutulata in Laos. Wildfowl 47: 81-96.
Evans, T. D., Towll, H. C., Timmins, R. J., Thewlis, R. M., Stones,
A. J., Robichaud, W. G. and Barzen, J. (2000) Ornithological
records from the lowlands of South Laos during December 1 995-
Forktail 22 (2006) Wetland bird observations from Attapu and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR
53
September 1996, including areas on the Thai and Cambodian
borders. Forktail 16: 29-52.
Fuchs, J., Cibois, A., Duckworth, J. W., Eve, R., Robichaud, W. G.,
Tizard, T. and van Gansberghe, D. (in prep.) A review of bird
records from Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river (Laos).
Goes, F. and Chamnan, H. (2002) The status and conservation of large
waterbirds on the Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia 2000-2001. Phnom
Penh: Wildlife Conservation Society-Cambodia Program.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. (1975) A field guide
to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collms.
Robichaud, W. G. (1998) WCS internal trip report: Dakchung Plateau,
Xekong province, and lowlands near Attapeu; 9-21 December
1997. Vientiane: Wildlife Conservation Society Lao Program.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C. (2005) From the field. BirdingASIA 3: 77-85.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Anderson, G. Q. A., Dvorak, M.,
Evans, T. D., Nemeth, E., Timmins, R. J. and Wilkinson, R. J.
(1996) Ornithological records from Laos, 1992 1993. Forktail
11: 47 100.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Evans, 1'. D. and Timmins, R. J.
(1998) The conservation status of birds in Laos: a review of key
species. Bird Conserv. Intemat. 8 (Suppl.): 1-159.
Timmins, R. ]., Evans, T. D. and Duckworth, J. W. ( 1 993) A wildlife
and habitat survey of Xe Piane proposed protected area,
Champassak, Laos. Unpublished report by LSFP/IUCN to the
National Office for Nature Conservation and Watershed
Management, Government of Lao PDR.
Timmins, R. J. and Robichaud, W. G. (2005) Birds and mammals of
conservation concern in the area of the proposed Nam Theun 1
hydropower project - assessment and recommendations.
Unpublished report to Electrowatt-Ekono Ltd.
Mark R. Bezuijen, Wildlife Conservation Society Lao Program, PO Box 6712, Vientiane, Lao PDR. Email:
bezuijen@dodo. com. an
APPENDIX 1
Gazetteer of survey localities in Lao PDR mentioned in text
54
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
APPENDIX 2
Bird species recorded in four wetland sites in Central and South Lao PDR, March-June 2005
Forktail 22 (2006) Wetland bird observations from Attapu and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR
55
56
MARK R. BEZUIJEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
Conservation status in Laos (Duckworth et al. 1999): At Risk in Laos (AR); Potentially at Risk in Laos (PR); Little Known in Laos (LK).
Symbols: ‘x’ - field record (number of individuals not recorded); number of individuals given for a single observation of a species recorded only
once in a site or, peak numbers/day (for sites with multiple days of records).
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 57-70
New bird records for the Babuyan islands,
Philippines, including two first records
for the Philippines
D. ALLEN, C. ESPANOLA, G. BROAD, C. OLIVEROS and J. C.T. GONZALEZ
In April-June 2004, we visited the Babuyan islands, Philippines, with the principal objective of surveying birds. Calayan, Camiguin
Norte, Babuyan Claro, Dalupiri and three islets were visited, resulting in the discovery of a new species to science: Calayan Rail Gallirallus
calayanensis , 220 new distributional records for 114 species, including two new records for the Philippines, Pied Cuckoo Clamator
jacobinus and Orange-flanked Bush Robin Tarsiger cyanurus, and new information on breeding and timing of migration for several species.
INTRODUCTION
The Babuyan islands consist of a cluster of small, separate,
oceanic islands, none larger than 200 km2, located in the
far north of the Philippines, north of Luzon and south of
the Batanes islands (Figs. 1-2). The islands lie in deep
water and the largest five were apparently not connected
to each other or to other Philippine islands during the last
glaciation (Heaney 1985). The islands of Calayan,
Camiguin Norte, Babuyan Claro and Dalupiri lie within
the municipality of Calayan in the province of Cagayan,
while Fuga is part of the municipality of Aparri.
Much of the scientific knowledge of the avifauna of
the Babuyan group derives from specimens and sight
records from a century ago, and was summarised in
Dickinson et al. (1991) and Kennedy et al. (2000). None
of the five main islands in the group had previously been
intensively surveyed for birds, and one, Babuyan Claro,
had scarcely been visited at all. The first record of a biologist
visiting the islands was in May 1895, when John
Whitehead, a British naturalist, visited Fuga. Richard
McGregor, an American ornithologist at the Bureau of
Sciences (Manila), explored Fuga in 1903 (26 August to
c.3 September), then continued his expedition on Calayan,
(6 September 1903 to January 1904; McGregor 1904,
1905, 1906). He returned to the area in 1907, visiting
Batan and Y’ami in the Batanes, then continuing via
Babuyan Claro (for about three hours on June 18) to
Camiguin Norte, and, apparently, Pamoctan (June 19-
July 21) (McGregor 1907); on 19 August 1909 he visited
Dalupiri (McGregor 1910).
Edgar Mearns, a U. S . Army surgeon, spent a night on
Fuga, May 29-30, in 1907 (Mearns 1907) before exploring
Didicas rocks with Dean Conant Worcester in the same
year. In 1 980, Filipino collectors working for the Delaware
Museum of Natural History visited Fuga (Dickinson etal.
1991). Researchers and affiliates of the Smithsonian
Institution (including Ronald Crombie, Charles A. Ross
and Hidetoshi Ota) collected specimens from Camiguin
Norte, Dalupiri and Fuga in 1989, returning again in
March 1990 to Fuga, Barit (situated west of Fuga),
Dalupiri and, briefly, Babuyan Claro and Calayan (H.
Ota, R. S. Kennedy, C. A. Ross in litt. 2005).
These visits led to published records of 1 24 bird species
from the Babuyan islands, including 106 on Calayan, 42
on Camiguin, 44 on Fuga and five each on Dalupiri and
Babuyan Claro. About half of all these species can be
considered migrants. Three of the resident species are
more typical of the avifauna of the southern Japanese
Ryukyu islands (Nansei Shoto) and Lanyu Island of
Taiwan, and do not occur in the Philippine islands south
of the Babuyans: Brown-eared Bulbul Microscelis
amaurotis. Whistling Green Pigeon Treron formosae and
Ryukyu Scops Owl Otus elegans. Fourteen subspecies are
endemic to the Babuyans, and another four subspecies
are endemic to the Babuyan and Batanes islands. Three
subspecies are endemic to the Batanes but are not known
at present from the Babuyan islands.
Owing to this distribution of restricted-range species
and the position of the two groups of islands in the
migration flyway between north-east Asia and the
Philippines, the Babuyan and Batanes islands have been
Figure 1. The location of the Babuyan islands in the Philippines.
Dark shading indicates sea depth > 100 m; paler shading indicates sea
depth 0-100 m.
58
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Figure 2. The location of the main study sites in the islands visited.
classified as the Philippines’ northernmost Important Bird
Area (Mallari et al. 2001) and as a secondary area for
endemic birds (Stattersfield et al. 1998).
In April-June 2004, the Babuyan Islands Expedition
2004, organised and led by CO and GB, conducted a
preliminary survey of the terrestrial fauna for the
community and government of the Babuyan islands.
Calayan, Camiguin Norte, Babuyan Claro, Dalupiri and
three islets were visited (Oliveros et al. 2004). The main
purpose of this paper is to document new information on
bird distributions. We also present data on breeding, dates
of migrants and other interesting records.
METHODS
In order to gain as comprehensive a bird list as possible for
each island, we searched for birds in as many habitat types
as we could find. Where possible, calls were recorded and
photographs and video recordings taken. Additionally,
CO, GB, CE and JCTG conducted mist-netting at the
main study sites. Local people were interviewed and shown
pictures of birds in Kennedy et al. (2000). Some showed
a good knowledge of many bird species and in some cases
their comments led to searches for specific species. The
first four authors were present throughout the survey
period from 1 April to3June2004;JCTGjoinedtheteam
from 24 May 2004. Table 1 lists the sites visited and dates
of fieldwork. Areas are taken from http://www.calayan-
cagayan.gov.ph/, elevations are taken from NAMRIA
( 1 999a,b,c,d, 2003) and human population sizes are from
the 2000 census (http://www.census.gov.ph/census2000/
index.html). The following islands were visited:
Camiguin Norte (166 km2; population 3,936) is
characterised by steep forested hills with ridges up to
c.550 m, and a peak of 828 m, overlain with clay and
paddyfields in small river floodplains. There is an active
volcanic cone in the south: Mt Camiguin (712m). There
are three main settlement areas: Balatubat and Naguilian
along the island’s south-west cove, and Minabel on the
north-west coast.
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
59
60
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
at the edges. There are grasslands along the eastern
coastline and at the north-western tip. In the north, there
are extensive tidal coral flats protecting sandy beaches
between the settlements of Dilam and Dibay. In addition
to these sites, a boat trip was made on 5 May around the
entire island to survey the coast and reef flats for birds.
We stopped briefly to interview local people and to conduct
further searches at Dilam on the north-east coast, and at
Dibay on the north-west coast. A separate trip was made
by GB and CE on 7 May along the south-west coast to
Katanapan Point.
Dalupiri (50 km-\ population 555) is a relatively low-lying
(297 m), cigar-shaped island, orientated north-south. The
island consists of coralline limestone and lava flows; these
flows form cliffs in places. It is privately owned and
managed as a ranch. The main settlement, Visita, lies on
the south-east coast. Cattle, horses and feral water buffalo
roam freely over the entire island, grazing most of the
vegetation short. There are areas of low secondary growth
forest but almost no mature forest remains. Dogs and cats
are not allowed on the island. The east coast of Dalupiri
was surveyed on 22 May by boat, but weather did not
permit a circuit of the island.
Guinapao rocks (= Dilayag) (<0.3 km2, uninhabited)
consist of two very steep cones of rock, c.100 m high,
covered by grass on the top. They were visited en route
from Santa Ana, Luzon to Balatubat on 1 April 2004, but
disembarkation was not possible.
Didicas (0.7 km2, uninhabited) was visited by Mearns and
Worcester in 1907. However, the present island was re¬
formed by an eruption in 1952 (Alcaraz et al. 1956) into
a 244 m high cone of volcanic dust and rocks, and is now
still virtually devoid of vegetation. It was visited en route
from Balatubat to Babuyan Claro on 16 April 2004. No
birds were seen.
RESULTS
Assuming the distributions indicated in Kennedy et al.
(2000) represent all currently accepted records of birds
for the islands, we made 220 new distributional records
for 114 species, including the discovery of Calayan Rail
Gallirallus calayanensis , which was new to science (Allen
etal. 2004) . Two new species for the Philippines were also
recorded: Pied Cuckoo Clamator jacobinus and Orange-
flanked Bush Robin Tarsiger cyanurus.
Details of selected species are included below; all
records are summarised in the appendix. In a separate
paper we summarise the status of each species on each
island. We name subspecies where these are known to be
endemic to these islands. Almost all records were made
by sight, most of which are supported by photographic
images, sound recordings and/or descriptions, and a few
by specimens. However, records in brackets indicate that
good views were not obtained, or only calls were heard,
and the record needs to be confirmed.
[Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus ]
A single bird starting to moult into breeding plumage, but
still lacking the characteristic species-specific head plumes,
was seeninpaddyfields onCorogon 18 April 2004. It was
tentatively identified as Chinese Pond Heron rather than
Javan Pond Heron Ardeola speciosa on range alone. There
are only three records accepted in the Philippines
(Kennedy et al. 2000) but other birds were photographed
in Luzon on 27 November 2004 by R. Ocon (see http://
www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/36869933) and in
2005 by I. Luna and J. Villasper (in litt. 2005).
Rufous Night Heron Nycticorax caledonicus
At Caucauayan, Dalupiri, six nests were found around
the pool and examined by CO on 23 May 2004: one on
a rock by the waterfall contained two eggs and five others
were in surrounding trees, including two containing two
eggs each, one was occupied by a juvenile, and another
had a juvenile nearby.
Philippine DuckAms luzonica
Vulnerable; restricted-range. On Dalupiri a pair was flushed
regularly from paddyfields at Caucauayan, with two pairs
on one occasion. The species may well breed here.
TAHITI Petrel Pterodroma rostrata
A single bird was seen by DA offshore from Babuyan
Claro on 1 6 April 2004. It was similar in size to a Wedge¬
tailed Shearwater Puffinus pacificus, although it could not
be directly compared with other birds. It was the shape of
a shearwater and flew with straight wings (see Brooke
2004). No white was noticed on the underwings despite
observation as close as 20 m, but the sea was rough. It had
a dark bill, chocolate-brown upperparts, head and upper
breast, with a clean border with a white lower breast, belly
and flanks. There are no other species showing this plumage
pattern in the region. Phoenix Petrel Pterodroma alba occurs
further east but has a ‘lighter’ jizz and shows white on the
chin and throat. There are two previous specimen records
from the Philippines: Laguna de Bay, Luzon on 26 May
1926, and Negros on 21 August 1963 (Dickinson et al.
1991), and a possible sighting by Salwegter north of Luzon
on 31 August 1969 (Bourne and Dixon 1973).
Bulwer’S Petrel Bulweria bulwerii
A single bird was videoed from a boat on 3 June 2004. It
was much smaller than Wedge-tailed Shearwaters that
had been observed a short while earlier. The tail showed
no notch, unlike the somewhat similar Oceanodroma
petrels, but was smoothly graduated to a rather narrow
point. A pale bar ran along the rear of the upperwing-
coverts. Although there is only one previous published
record acknowledged by Kennedy et al. (2000) — Homskov
(1996) — Weitkowitz reported ‘many’ on 19 June 1980
north of Luzon (Chapman 1982), although no
identification details were given. It seems likely that this
species and many other seabirds have been under-recorded
owing to the difficulty of obtaining specimens.
Wedge-tailed Shearwater Puffinus pacificus
Several shearwaters were seen during boat journeys
between the islands. One or two identifiable as Wedge¬
tailed Shearwater were videoed between Dalupiri and
Pamoctan on 29 May 2004 and between Camiguin Norte
and Luzon on 3 June 2004. Other were not seen clearly
enough to confirm their identification. On Babuyan
Claro, a passage of all-dark shearwaters moving west
along the south coast was observed on 29 April 2004: 95
passed during 16hl8-16h38. They may all have been
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
61
Wedge-tailed Shearwaters, but some appeared to have
shorter tails.
TABON SCRUBFOWL Megapodius cumingii
This species was found on most of the islands. On
Pamoctan, many singles and pairs were seen: one was
seen calling and displaying in forest on 14 April 2004,
apparently in response to a distant, fast beat of an outboard
engine which had a similar rhythm to the bird’s call.
On Babuyan Claro, alarm or contact calls were often
heard. At least 1 2 mounds in the west of the island and ten
or more mounds near Rakwaranom were shown to us. We
did not observe the species in the wild on Dalupiri but one
was captured by locals from Caucauayan, and
photographed.
CALAYAN Rail Gallirallus calayanensis
Vulnerable; restricted-range. The discovery of this new
species was described in Allen et al. (2004).
White-browed Crake Porzana cinerea
This species was seen at Magasasok Lake and Balatubat
on Camiguin Norte, but not on any of the other islands.
Although McGregor (1910) included this species for
Calayan, his record was based on his own observations,
originally described thus: ‘ Poliolimnas (?) species. Once or
twice I flushed a small rail from a rice field on Calayan,
but could not be sure as to the genus. A liberal reward
offered for a “tookling” resulted in the production of two
black downy young on October 8, but no adults’
(McGregor 1904). Given the inadequate details, this
species should be removed from the Calayan list.
Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis
Although not previously reported from the Babuyans, we
found this species in all the larger areas of paddyfields
visited. On Camiguin Norte, breeding was confirmed from
a fledgling recently captured by a local child on 3 June
2004. Breeding has previously been recorded in March,
July and August. Many birds were present and calling in
the paddyfields on Dalupiri.
Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus
A single bird was seen and videoed in paddyfields at
Balatubat 1 2 April 2004. There are only three previously
published records: two from Batan, in November and
December, and one from Luzon in January.
Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii
Near Threatened. This species was present all along the
beach on the east coast of Dalupiri, with a pair every 300
m or so, despite much human activity. The absence of
dogs may allow this species to thrive here. Males were
conspicuous, but females were rather shyer. Both sexes
showed distraction displays, but neither nests nor chicks
were found, although breeding has been recorded
elsewhere in May.
BUKIDNON WOODCOCK Scolopax bukidnonensis
W e were alerted to the presence of woodcocks on Babuyan
Claro by our guides, but it took some time for us to see
them. Four separate birds were seen on 23 April 2004
along the summit trail of Mt Pangasun above 700 m.
These birds flushed low, not usually rising far from the
ground (three rising <3 m), and none broke through the
canopy. They were very dark and were initally identified
as Barred Rail Gallirallus torquatus. They showed blackish
upperparts, speckled with brown on the wings, with paler
sides to the wedge-shaped tail. The wingspan was
estimated at 40-50 cm. Another was seen in the same
area on 28 April 2004. A bird captured by our guide was
taken as a voucher specimen (PNM accession number:
NMB 019613). According to him, this species breeds on
the island in March and April.
The Bukidnon Woodcock is known from central and
northern Luzon and from four mountains on Mindanao
(Kennedy et al. 2001). Its discovery on Babuyan Claro
represents a northern range extension and the first record
on a small island. This species was also reported by local
people to be present on Calayan. We noted slight
differences between the specimen from Babuyan Claro
and one from Mindanao in the pattern of markings on the
primaries and back feathers. R. Kennedy in litt. 2004
mentioned that the specimens he examined might belong
to more than one subspecies but that there were too few
specimens available to be sure. The species clearly needs
more taxonomic study.
[Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola]
On Babuyan Claro, a single pale woodcock was flushed
and seen to rise vertically from the forest floor and tower
out of the canopy. This was the first woodcock to be seen
during fieldwork; it resembled a Eurasian Woodcock
Scolopax rusticola. Owing to possible confusion in the past
with the recently described Bukidnon Woodcock, there
are no definite records of this species from the Philippines.
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
Small numbers were seen on Camiguin Norte and Babuyan
Claro, but hundreds were present on the short pasture on
Dalupiri. Numbers there dropped after the passage of a
typhoon on 22-25 May, suggesting that some were
migrants. However, some birds may be resident breeders
as several individuals showed apparent nest distraction
behaviour when approached, although no nests could be
found.
Whistling Green Pigeon Treron formosae filipina
Near Threatened; restricted-range. The race filipina is so
far only known from the Batanes, Camiguin Norte and
Calayan. On Babuyan Claro, we neither saw nor heard
this species during our stay, but local guides knew it well:
they explained how it visits the island during September
to January, when it was avidly hunted until recently. On
Dalupiri, locals were familiar with the call of this species
and reported that it visits the island in the ‘rainy season’
(October-February) .
Gibbs et al. (2001) listed a number of characteristics
of filipina, but questioned whether these were sufficient to
support its subspecific status. Our limited observations
and photographs appear to confirm the differences: the
maroon on the wings of some males, insofar as viewing
angles allowed, appeared to spread onto the mantle; the
centre of the abdomen can be seen in photographs to be
creamy-white; the bill is blue to the tip; and the iris has a
bright blue inner ring separated from the pink outer part
by a dusky intermediate ring. From observations, photos
and video we also noted the following: at least one bird
showed an extensive area of blue orbital skin; an apparent
immature bird showed creamy-white underparts from
62
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
the vent to the upper breast; and females were most easily
identified in flight by the yellow-green tail that contrasted
noticeably with the greyer-green wings and upperparts.
Although only the calls of Whistling Green Pigeon were
heard, it seems possible that the rather similar White-
bellied Green Pigeon Treron sieboldii , which occurs on
nearby Lanyu and Taiwan, might also occasionally occur
in the Babuyans and Batanes.
Black-chinned Fruit Dove Ptilinopus leclancheri
Breeding was confirmed on Camiguin Norte: a nest 1.5
m above the ground in low trees near Magasasok contained
a single egg on 13 April 2004, and another nest was
photographed on the slopes of Mt Mapula-pula on 1 June
2004. On Pamoctan, subadult birds showed a grey
terminal tail-band which was especially obvious when
fanned (as noted by Gibbs et al. 2001), but some adults
showed a narrow yellow tail-tip, possibly caused by wear.
Although this species is normally a rich green colour, in
some light conditions it resembled the paler slightly
yellowish-green of a green pigeon Treron spp.
Philippine Cuckoo Dove
Macropygia (amboinensis) tenuirostris
The race septentrionalis is endemic to the Batanes, while
the race phaea is known from Calayan only. Birds on
Babuyan Claro might be either race, or intermediate. Study
of more specimens from these islands is needed.
ASIAN Koel Eudynamys scolopacea
McGregor (1904) described the taxon frater of Calayan
as a distinct species and claimed it occurred alongside E.
(s.) mindanensis on Calayan. We commonly heard koels
on all the islands but they were extremely shy and views
were rare. We were unable to capture any, so we cannot
comment on the co-existence of two forms.
Philippine Coucal Centropus viridis
The race major with chestnut wings is known only from
Calayan, Dalupiri, Fuga and Camiguin Norte, while the
all-black race carpenteri is known only from the Batanes.
We found birds with chestnut wings on Pamoctan and
Babuyan Claro, and presume these were therefore major.
Pied Cuckoo Clamator jacobinus
At Visita, Dalupiri, on 21 May 2004 an ungainly, long¬
tailed, black or blackish bird with obvious large white
patches in the centre of dark wings and white corners to
the tail was seen with binoculars flying across an area of
pasture. The rounded shape of the wing and its pattern
were strongly reminiscent of a Dollarbird Eurystomus
orientalis, but the white corners to a long tail were
completely at variance with that species. When perched,
it showed a tall, pointed, black crest and cap and ear-
coverts, with a white throat and upper breast, but the
lower breast and belly could not be seen. The bird, with
its small, dark, curved bill, resembled a cuckoo of roughly
similar size to an Oriental Cuckoo Cuculus saturatus. It
was identified as Pied Cuckoo. The only remotely similar
species is Red-winged Cuckoo C. coromandus, which might
be expected to occur on passage in these islands. However,
the light conditions were good, and the white wing-patches
and lack of rufous in the wings was clearly seen. Pied
Cuckoo has a westerly distribution, breeding in Asia in
India and Myanmar, but it has occurred in the southern
Ryukyu islands of Japan: one bird was video-recorded on
Iriomotejima on 1 June 1997 (Kamata 1997).
‘NORTHERN Boobook’ Ninox (scutulata) japonica
This taxon has recently been proposed as a distinct species
from the other forms of Brown Hawk Owl Ninox scutulata
by King (2002). Although it was listed as a migrant by
E)ickinson et al. (1991) and Kennedy et al. (2000),
McGregor (1907) stated that it apparently bred on
Camiguin Norte: he obtained two adult and two full-
grown juvenile specimens. We heard a pair calling ( boo-
boo ) from a tree-top in a clearing at Longog, Calayan,
throughout the evenings of 10-13 May. This call is quite
similar to some renditions of the two-note call of Elegant
Scops Owl Otus elegans, with which it was initially confused.
Other single birds were seen in the forest including one
videoed giving a repeated boo-boo-boo-boo call. It seems
quite possible that the taxon breeds on Calayan.
Glossy Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta
On Camiguin Norte, a sea cave at the south-west point of
the island containing many hundreds of breeding Glossy
Swiftlets was visited by boat on 1 1 April 2004. The nests
were crammed together in clusters of up to several hundred
on the cave roof. Many were quite near the entrance and
above the water. Two birds were netted on 26 May 2004
in a cave near Caucauayan, Dalupiri, which contained a
few hundred nests. One specimen was collected (PNM
accession number: NMB 019616).
Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacifkus
Many were seen flying around Guinapao rocks on 1 April
2004, suggesting that it was a breeding site (and therefore
that the birds were of the resident race kanoi known from
Batan, Camiguin Norte and Sabtang, and also from
T aiwan west to Tibet) . About 20 were seen over Pamoctan
on 1 June 2004. One that was photographed showed a
rather dark throat, again indicative of kanoi rather than
the migrant race pacificus of north China to south Japan.
RED-BELLIED PITTA Pitta erythrogaster
One juvenile was observed and videoed at Camiguin Norte
on 3 June 2004. It was dull brown with speckling on the
breast apparently owing to pale feather centres, as illustrated
by Lambert and Woodcock (1996). The bill was blackish
with a pinkish-red tip and base; the forehead and forecrown
were pale and accentuated by dark lateral crown-stripes;
the throat was white and bordered by narrow malar stripes .
The bird called intermittently with a short, thin whistle.
[Unidentified swallow Hirundo spp.]
Swallows were seen on all the islands, but it was not possible
to determine if they were Red-rumped Swallow H. daurica
of the migrant race japonica (from Japan) or Striated
Swallow H. striolata of the nominate race which is resident
in the Philippines. Video footage of birds on Calayan
shows that the underparts were strongly streaked and
resemble photographs of H. daurica japonica in Iozawa et
al. (2000), Kanouchi et al. (1998) and Maki and Onishi
(2000) . Dickinson and Dekker (200 1 ) discussed whether
this taxon should be treated at the species level. Birds
were seen in and around nests on buildings in the centre
of Centro, Calayan, on 18-19 May 2004. One pair was
seen to copulate several times and one of the pair at least
was apparently nest-building.
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
63
Orange-flanked Bush Robin Tarsiger cyanurus
On Calayan, a single bird was mist-netted at forest edge
at Longog on 10 May 2004. It was olive-brown above,
browner on the wings and bluish on the lower back. 7'he
throat and belly were white; the sides of the breast were
olive-brown, meeting in a narrow band across the centre
of the breast. The flanks showed an orange patch partly
concealed by the folded wing. The bill was black, with
pinkish horn at the base. The forehead was slightly paler
than the crown and there was a distinct pale eye-ring. The
lack of any blue in the olive-green upperparts in April
suggests that it was a female rather than a first-winter
male. This species is common in Japan and migrates to
South-East Asia in winter. A vagrant in the Philippines is
not unexpected.
Mangrove Blue Flycatcher Cyomis rufigastra
This resident species was found for the first time in the
Babuyans, on both Pamoctan and Camiguin Norte (where
a specimen was collected: PNM accession number: NMB
019615). Video footage of the bird on Pamoctan shows
white undertail-coverts and bright blue upperparts
consistent with the race blythi of Luzon.
Short-crested Monarch Hypothymis helenae
Near Threatened; restricted-range. On 8 April 2004, a
cup-shaped nest was found in a fork of a small tree c. 1 m
above the ground near Limandok, Camiguin Norte. It
was constructed of fine roots woven together with
cobwebs; the external dimensions were estimated at 4x4
cm. A pair were observed at the nest for c. 10 minutes. No
eggs were present when the nest was checked the next
day. This vocal species was never heard on nearby
Pamoctan, nor on Babuyan Claro, Calayan or Dalupiri,
so it is presumed to be absent from these islands.
PURPLE-THROATED SUNBIRD Nectarinia sperata
This is the only small, widespread, resident, forest
passerine on the islands, although even this species seems
to be absent from Dalupiri. On Camiguin Norte, a small
pendulous nest attached near the tip of a fern frond and
suspended c.l.5m above a trail was found on 3 April
2004. Externally it appeared to be an untidy tangle of
dried leaves and stems; it had an entrance on one side in
the shape of a tear-drop. The nest contained two brown
eggs. On Babuyan Claro, a similar, small, pendulous nest
hanging above the summit trail north of Corog belonged
to this species according to our guide.
PYGMY FlOWERPECKER Dicaeum pygmaeum
The subspecies fugaensis is known from Calayan and Fuga
which were the only islands on which we recorded it. On
14 May 2004, an adult apparently of this species was
videoed feeding a fledgling that had a bright yellow bill.
The juvenile begged with a repeated thin teep. Similar
birds were observed and recorded giving a song of repeated
double notes zip-zip... zip-zip... zip-zip rather than a
random sequence of zip... zip... notes as described by
Kennedy et al. (2000).
DISCUSSION
The Babuyan islands lie directly in the path of birds
migrating between the Philippines and north-east Asia,
so all of the winter migrants from the latter region can be
expected to occur. We expect further studies will provide
a more complete picture of the occurrence and status of
such species, which include the threatened Chinese
Crested Tern Sterna bemsteini, Chinese Egret Egretta
eulophotes, Japanese Night Heron Gorsachius goisagi,
Streaked Reed Warbler, Acrocephalus sorghophilus, Ijima’s
Warbler Phylloscopus ijimae and Japanese Yellow Bunting
Embenza sulphurata.
The islands hold many endemic races. Some are found
on both the Babuyans and the Batanes (e.g. Green Imperial
Pigeon Ducula aenea fugaensis ), others are endemic to
the Babuyans, and yet others have differentiated even
with the Babuyans (e.g. Chestnut-eared Bulbul Ixos
amaurotis batanensis is endemic to Babuyan Claro and
Batan, with fugaensis on Calayan, Dalupiri and Fuga
and camiguinensis on Camiguin Norte, although this
taxonomy requires review). Many taxonomic questions
remain to be resolved e.g. whether Reddish Cuckoo
Doves on Babuyan Claro belong to septentrionalis of the
Batanes or phaea of Calayan, and whether Slaty-legged
Crakes on Camiguin Norte and Babuyan Claro belong to
alvarezi of the Batanes or the more widely distributed
eurizonoides. Further analysis of specimens in the
Smithsonian Institution may help to answer some of
these questions and to clarify the distribution of many of
these taxa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank: Marisol Pedregosa, Mylanar Saulog, Lisa Marie Paguntalan,
William Oliver, Nina Ingle, Anna Feistner, Rob Lucking, Philip
Atkinson and John Dutton for advice with the preparation of the project;
Arnel Genova, Eduardo Peralta, Villamor Modes, Alex Dican, Kennedy
Quiamzon, Bisting Tomas, Noli Derecho, Roel ‘Amboy’ Payas, R. J.
Escalante, Roger Cobo, Fernando Estabillo, Roberto Balmes, Ernesto
Gimo, Saturnino Baltazar, Piding Ambala, Rodel Gudoy, Alfredo
‘Jimboy’ Ruiz Jr., Nancy Dian, Renato and Lilia Escalante, Luding
and Awit Llopis, Angie Telan, Jimmy and Imay Mariano, Joel, Mercy,
Jay, Joy and Jomar Escalante, Modesto and Benedicta Tomas, Emma
Ruiz, Jun and Vicky Arellano, Nestor and Alice Escalante, Ramon
Relado, Rosalinda T an and Nestor Quesada for assistance in the islands;
local and national government officials who provided support including
Joseph Llopis, Leo Batislaon, Jose Gasa, Alberto Dican, Lino Escalante,
Rodolfo Nunez, Roque Ventura, Bella Llopis, Armand Llopis, Carlo
Custodio, Antonio Principe, Armando Bucat, Sanchez Mira and Vicente
Bayucan. The following people generously gave their time for discussions
and shared ideas and expertise: Hidetoshi Ota, Edward Dickinson,
Robert S. Kennedy, Arne Jensen, Lucia Liu Severinghaus, Nigel Collar
and Richard Thomas. We also thank: Lourdes Castillo and Lourdes
Cardenas of the University of the Philippines-Los Banos
Interdisciplinary Committee for providing the collection permit; Maria
Josefa Veluz, Francis Veluz, Edison Cosico and Roger Sison of the
National Museum of the Philippines for help with access to specimens
and references; Kiyoaki Ozaki and T akashi Hiraoka of the Y amashina
Institute for Ornithology; Robert Prys-Jones and Mark Adams of The
Natural History Museum, Tring, U.K.; Jon Hornbuckle for sharing
bird call recordings; Mike Lu and the Wild Bird Club of the Philippines;
Jose Mari Dacian, WWF Philippines and VSO-Philippines for
logistical support; Mike Atrigenio, Critical Ecosystems Partnership
Fund; Elson Aca and Abegail Machica for preparation of the maps;
Francis Ward for help with RNBWS records; and Hector Miranda for
comments on the paper. The project would not have been possible
without the financial support of our sponsors: the Rufford Small
64
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Grant Committee, U.K. and the OBC, and Ideawild (U.S.A.) who
donated equipment.
REFERENCES
Alcaraz, A., Ahad L. F. and Tupas, M. H. (1956) The Didicas
submarine volcano. Proc. Eighth Pacific Sci. Congr. 2: 139-156.
Allen, D., Oliveros, C., Espanola, C., Broad, G. and Gonzalez, J. C.
T. (2004) A new species of Gallirallus from Calayan island,
Philippines. Forktail 20: 1-7.
Bhushan, B., Fry, G., Hibi, A., Mundkur, T., Prawiradilaja, D., Sonobe,
K. and Usui, S. ( 1 993 ) A field guide to the zvaterbirds of Asia. T okyo:
Wild Bird Society of Japan.
Bourne, W. R. P. and Dixon, T. J. (1973) Observations of seabirds
1967-69. Sea Szvallow 22: 37
Brooke, M. (2004) Albatrosses and petrels across the ivorld. Oxford,
U. K.: Oxford University Press.
Chapman, S. E. (1982) Notes on seabird reports received 1980-81.
Sea Szvallow 31:15
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines: an annotated checklist. Tring, U.K.: British
Ornithologists’ Union (Checklist 12).
Dickinson, E. C. and Dekker R. W. R. J. (2001 ) Preliminary review of
the Flirundinidae. Zool. Verb. Leiden 335: 145-166
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E. and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves of the world.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Heaney, L. R. (1985) Zoogeographic evidence for middle and late
Pleistocene land bridges to the Philippine islands. Mod. Quaternary
Res. S.E. Asia 9: 127-143.
Hornskov, J. (1996) Recent observations of birds in the Philippine
archipelago. Forktail 11: 1-10.
Iozawa, H., Yamagata, N., and Yoshino, T. (2000) Nihon no tori 550:
Sanya no tori. Tokyo: Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan.
Kamata, A. (1997) Pied Cuckoo Clamatorjacobinus. Image downloaded
from http://wwwl .accsnet.ne.jp/~ikecho/OKINAWA/gallery/
BWCuckoo970601.jpg on 7 February 2006.
Kanouchi, T., Abe, N., and Ueda, H. (1998) Wild birds of Japan.
Tokyo: Yama-Kei. (In Japanese.)
Kennedy, R. S., Fisher, T. H., Harrap, S. C. B., Diesmos, A. C. and
Manamtam, A. S. (2001) A new species of woodcock (Aves:
Scolopadidae) from the Philippines and a re-evaluation of other
Asian/Papuasian woodcock. Forktail 17: 1-12.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda H. C. and
Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
King B. (2002) Species limits in the Brown Boobok Ninox scutulata
Complex. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 122(4): 250-257
Lambert, F. R. and Woodcock, M. (1996) Pittas, broadbills and asities.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Maki, H. and Onishi, T. (2000) A photographic guide to the birds of
Japan. Tokyo: Heibonsha. (In Japanese.)
Mallari, N.A.D., Tabaranza, B. R Jr. and Crosby, M. J. (2001) Key
conservation sites in the Philippines: a Haribon Foundation and Birdlife
International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City,
Philippines: Bookmark.
McGregor, R. C. (1904) Birds of Calayan and Fuga, Babuyan Group.
Bull. Phil. Mus. 4: 3-34.
McGregor, R. C. (1905) Further notes on birds from Ticao, Cuyo,
Culion, Calayan, Lubang, and Luzon. Bull. Bur. Govt. Labs. Manila
25: 25-34.
McGregor, R. C. (1906) Papers on Philippine birds. I: a collecting trip
to Calayan and Fuga Condor : 8: 2-16
McGregor, R. C. (1907) The birds of Batan, Camiguin, Y’Ami, and
Babuyan Claro, islands north of Luzon. Phil. J. Sci. 2: 337-349.
McGregor, R. C. (1909-1910) A manual of Philippine birds. Manila:
Bureau of Printing.
McGregor, R. C. (1910) Birds from the coast of Northern Luzon and
from the islands of Sabtan and Dalupiri. Phil J. Sci. 5: 219-221
Mearns, E. A. (1907) Untitled. Unpublished manuscript held in the
Smithsonian Institution.
NAMRIA (1999a) Camiguin Island, Philippines. Sheet 7380 I,
corresponding to PNTMS sheet 3338 I. Makati City, Philippines:
Department of Environment & Natural Resources, National
Mapping & Resource Information Authority.
NAMRIA (1999b) Calayan Island, Philippines. Sheet 7281 I,
corresponding to PNTMS Sheet3239 II. Makati City, Philippines:
Department of Environment & Natural Resources, National
Mapping & Resource Information Authority.
NAMRIA (1999c) Dalupiri Island, Philippines. Sheet 7281 III,
corresponding to PNTMS sheet 3239 III. Makati City, Philippines:
Department of Environment & Natural Resources, National
Mapping & Resource Information Authority.
NAMRIA ( 1 999d) Fuga Island, Philippines. Sheet 7280 1, corresponding
to PNTMS sheet 3238 I. Makati City, Philippines: Department of
Environment & Natural Resources, National Mapping & Resource
Information Authority.
NAMRIA (2003) San Dionisio, [Babuyan Claro] Philippines. Sheet
33781. Makati City, Philippines: Department of Environment &
Natural Resources, National Mapping & Resource Information
Authority.
Oliveros, C., Broad, G., Pedregosa, M., Espanola, C., Reyes, M.A.,
Garcia, H. J., Gonzalez, J. C. T. and Bajarias, A. Jr. (2004) An
avifaunal survey of the Babuyan islands, Northern Philippines,
with notes on mammals, reptiles and amphibians: final report.
Unpublished report.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Desmond Allen, 97 Sussex Way, London N7 6RU, U.K. Email: dnsallen@ukonline.co.uk
Carmela P. Espanola, Isla Biodiversity Conservation, 30-D Delgado Street, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines. Email:
lala924@yahoo.com
Carl H. Oliveros, Isla Biodiversity Conservation, 9 Bougainvillea St, Manuela Subdivision, Las Pinas City, Philippines 1741.
Email: carl_oliveros@yahoo. com
Genevieve Broad, Essex Biodiversity Project, Joan Elliot Visitor Centre, Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester,
Essex CO 5 7RZ, U.K. Email: genevieveb@essexwt.org.uk
Juan Carlos T. Gonzalez, Animal Biology Division, Institute of Biological Sciences, College of Arts arid Sciences, University
of the Philippines-Los Banos, College, Laguna 4031 Philippines. Email: jctgonzalez@yahoo.com
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
65
66
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Gallicrex cinerea Balatubat 24-27 April
1 5 April and 3 June;
none calling so
presumed migrants
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
67
68
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
New bird records for the Babuyan islands, Philippines
69
3+12 April
70
D. ALLEN et al.
Forktail 22 (2006)
CRESTED Myna AR Common around Common on Rare: 2 Corog, 3 May onwards, Breeding
Acndotheres cristatellus Balatubat, pasture, E coast 16+29 April Centro (juvs in cave),
9-14 April Visita and cliffs
to NE, 20 May
Key
Details are given here of species previously unrecorded for each island, exceptionally late migrants, and notable breeding records. All records
were confirmed by an observer experienced with Philippine birds and regional migrants (DA, latterly also JCTG), except for those marked with
an asterisk. Square brackets indicate species of unconfirmed identification. The few species previously recorded on Didicas are indicated in
the Status column.
AR (area record): first record of the species in the Babuyans or Batanes.
Bs (Batanes only): species known from the Batanes but not the Babuyans.
ER (endemic race): subspecies endemic to the Philippines.
LER (local endemic race): subspecies restricted to the islands mentioned.
PR: first record of the species on the Philippines
PRL: Previous latest record in the year for a spring migrant.
Juvs: juveniles
Imms: immatures
NBs: birds in non-breeding plumage.
M: male
F: female
X: previously recorded from this island (data from Kennedy et al. 2000)
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 71-76
Additional information on the autumn migration of
raptors in east Bali, Indonesia
FRANCESCO GERMI and DONOWALUYO
Following a preliminary survey in autumn 2004, we carried out the first full-season raptor migration count for Indonesia in the Seraya
Range, in eastern Bali, during September-November 2005. In 65 days, 91,232 raptors were observed migrating eastwards, indicating
a large influx of raptors of eastern Palearctic origin into Wallacea, heretofore unreported. At least five species were involved: Oriental
Honey-buzzard Pemis ptilorhyncus. Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus, Chinese Sparrowhawk Accipiter soloensis, Japanese Sparrowhawk
A. gularis and Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus. With 49,81 1 identified individuals, Chinese Sparrowhawk was the most common raptor
on passage. Owing to the distance at which observations were made and plumage similarities, a significant proportion of sparrowhawks
could not be identified to species level. Hunting and feeding during migration was observed in three species. We recorded evidence of
illegal trade in migratory sparrowhawks at a local bird market.
INTRODUCTION
Approximately one million raptors migrate along the
system of corridors known as the East Asian Flyway, which
stretches from eastern Siberia to South-East Asia and the
Indonesian Archipelago, mostly overland but including
water crossings of up to 300 km (Lane and Parish 1991,
Zalles and Bildstein 2000, Bildstein and Zalles 2005).
The first systematic data on raptor migration for
Indonesia were collected only two decades ago by Ash
(Ash 1 984, 1993). Over a period of 32 consecutive days
in October-November 1990, he observed over 11,000
migrating raptors passing through the bay of T eluk T erima,
in west Bali. However, despite a number of subsequent
surveys in Bali and Java (Mason 1994, Chong 2000,
Nuraeni and Suparman 2000, Nijman 200 1 a, b, 2004a,
Imansyah et al. 2002, Sukmantoro et al. 2005, B. van
Balen in litt. 2005), a full-season count was never attempted
before this study.
In October-November 2004, the eastern half of Bali
was surveyed by one of us (FG), in order to locate migration
routes and crossing points to the Lombok Strait, and to
undertake the first count of raptors migrating from Bali to
Wallacea. The Seraya Range was recognised as a migration
Table 1. Watch sites used in east Bali, September-November 2005.
bottleneck area and 8,430 raptors were counted during
preliminary work, mainly in the second half of the season.
This suggested that a substantial passage occurred over
the full season (Germi 2005) . In order to investigate further
the numbers of diurnal raptors migrating through east
Bali, we carried out a second survey in the Seraya Range
during September-November 2005, covering most of the
autumn migration season.
STUDY AREA
The Seraya Range is interposed between Mt Agung
(3,148 m) and the Lombok Strait, at the eastern end of
Bali’s central mountain spine (Fig. 1 ; for a description of
the study area, see Germi 2005). Prevailing winds in
September-November are from the south-west, creating
a favourable combination of ridge updrafts and partial
tail-wind support for eastbound migrating raptors, which
follow the island’s mountain spine as a leading line.
Six watch sites were used in the study area: Mt Sega,
Mt Bagas, Lempuyang, Tinjalas, Kusambi and Bugbug
(Table 1). The first three sites, all on mountain ridges on
the western side of the range, provided optimal views of
Watch site Coordinates Altitude (m) Description
Mt Sega 08°22'50"S 115038'17"E 765
Mt Bagas 08°22'20"S 115°38'30"E 847
Lempuyang 08°23'30"S 115°38T2"E 690
Tinjalas 08°24'48"S 115°41T8"E 330
Kusambi 08°23'36"S 115°42'34"E 72
Bugbug 08°29'40"S 115°35T4"E 114
Ridge with road access, 360° view from Mt Agung to the south coast, and
from the northern slopes of Seraya Range to Mt Kusambi and the Lombok
Strait. Optimal lookout in moderate south-west winds or no wind. Highest
passage recorded from this site.
Hill-top without road access. View of Mt Agung, north coast, northern
slopes of Seraya Range and Lombok Strait. Suitable when no wind.
Ridge with road access. View from westernmost slopes of Seraya Range to the
south coast, Amlapura and Bugbug. Optimal lookout in strong south-west
winds, when large flocks fly along the south coast to compensate for wind drift.
Hill-top with nearby road access. Broad view of the Lombok Strait, several
crossing points used in moderate south-west winds, and southern slopes of
Seraya Range. Many flocks cross at high altitude and/or distantly further
north-east.
Coastal lookout with road access. Easternmost point of Bali. Main crossing
area, but most migrants cross at high altitude and are mostly undetectable.
Nearby suitable hills lack road access.
Coastal hills with road access. Southernmost site, small passage noted in
days of strong south-west winds. Longer crossing compared with Seraya,
used mainly in conditions that require compensation for wind drift.
72
FRANCESCO GERMI and DONO WALUYO
Forktail 22 (2006)
Figure 1. Map of the study area in east Bali, with location of the watch sites used in September-November 2005: (1) Mt Bagas; (2) Mt Sega;
(3) Lempuyang; (4) Tinjalas; (5) Kusambi; (6) Bugbug.
the migration stream. From Mt Sega the view to the west
extended 1 5 km, from the northern slopes of Mt Agung
to the coast south of Amlapura, where most raptors
converging towards the crossing points of the Lombok
Strait passed. Looking east to the northern side of the
range, the strait and the island of Lombok could be seen.
Raptors crossing the strait were visible from the watch
sites of Tinjalas, Kusambi and Bugbug. However, the
height of migrants crossing the strait and the relatively
low altitude of these locations always resulted in lower
counts compared with the three previous sites.
METHODS
F ieldwork was conducted on 6 5 days during 4 September-
30 November 2005. Reconnaissance visits were made in
September, at the onset of the migration season, in order
to determine the best watch sites. Once the passage started,
counts were made mainly from 08h00 to 1 6h00 by a team
of 1-4 observers from a single watch site each day,
alternating the sites according to weather conditions, and
totalling 476 hours of observation. Priority was given to
the sites of Mt Sega, Mt Bagas and Lempuyang, which
provided a wider view of the passage.
Locations and directions were determined using a GPS
and compasses. Numbers were tallied using hand¬
held tally counters, and count data were recorded on
standard forms provided by HMANA (Hawk Migration
Association of North America), modified for local
requirements.
The directions from which migrants were more likely
to appear were constantly scanned with binoculars, and
between these scans the area above and on each side of
the observer were also checked. Single individuals or flocks
were followed until identification and direction of travel
were established . At ridge watch sites with combined views
to the west and the east, raptors were recorded only from
one side, generally from the arriving direction (west), in
order to avoid double counting. The passing raptors were
counted individually, but in instances of large flocks (>200
individuals), ‘blocks’ of ten birds were multiplied within
the flock, or the migrants were counted individually as
they streamed in lines out of thermals. Whenever possible,
counts of large flocks were repeated several times (Fuller
and Mosher 1981, Bildstein and Zalles 1995, Bibby etal.
2000).
Accipiters passing at more than 1 km distance from
the observer were not recorded to the species level. Distant
large migrating raptors were recorded as Oriental Honey-
buzzards Pemis ptilorhyncus , owing to the fact that 99.9%
of large identified raptors were of this species.
RESULTS
During September-November 2005, 9 1,232 raptors were
observed migrating eastward across the Seraya Range (Fig.
Forktail 22 (2006) Additional information on the autumn migration of raptors in east Bali, Indonesia
73
t n
■§ 5000
■Q
>
■g
6 <?
06 d- s.
t- C\] CM CM
llllllilli
900
800
700
co 600
76
15 500
>
T3
£ 400
(c) Oriental Honey-buzzard
300
200
100
0 -I
& & J5
co co 0
^ N S
Jl
.llllll _ ll
5 8 8 8 l , .
$ a ^
* £
Dates
: 2 £ & $ & &
Figure 2. Daily totals of (a) all migrant raptors; (b) sparrowhawks (Chinese Sparrowhawk Accipiter soloensis, Japanese Sparrowhawk A. gularis
and unidentified individuals of these two species); and (c) Oriental Honey-buzzard Pemis ptilorhyncus in east Bali, September-November 2005.
Heavy rain occurred on 17-19 October.
Table 2. Period of passage of migrant raptors, peak days and percentage of birds passing on the peak day, east Bali, September-November 2005.
74
FRANCESCO GERMI and DONO WALUYO
Forktail 22 (2006)
2) . A total of 83,499 sparrowhawks formed the majority of
the migrants, including 49,811 identified Chinese
Sparrowhawks Accipiter soloensis (54.6% ofthe total), 2, 1 82
identified Japanese Sparrowhawks A gularis (2.4%), and
31,506 unidentified sparrowhawks (34.5% of the total
and 37.7% of all sparrowhawks). Oriental Honey-buzzard
was the second most common migrant, with 7,717
individuals (8.5%), and nine Booted Eagles Hieraaetus
pennatus were recorded (two on the 22 October and singles
on 26, 27, 28 October and 2,5,11,15 November, all dark
morphs) . Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus of the migratory
race calidus, clearly distinguishable from the darker
resident race ernesti (also present in the area), was recorded
with seven migrants (four on 3 October; singles on 8 and
25 October and one on 3 November).
Peak passage was recorded on 2 1 October, when 7,163
raptors were counted. Nearly all migrants (95%, 86,282
individuals) passed during a 28-day period between 9
October and 5 November. During 17-19 October,
prolonged heavy rains occurred over east Bali, preventing
counts from being undertaken during most of this period
(Fig. 2; Table 2).
Visible passage mainly occurred between lOhOO-
1 3h00. Most passing flocks were easily detected from the
watch sites of Mt Sega, Mt Bagas and Lempuyang, from
where a consistent updraft caused by prevailing south¬
westerly winds resulted in birds passing directly overhead.
Raptors moved from the southern slopes of Mt Agung to
the Seraya Range and then continued eastward on their
way to Lombok. A small percentage followed a more
southerly to south-easterly route, to Bugbug-Mt Gumang-
Mulu Point, from where they crossed the Lombok Strait
at a slightly wider point. Wind speed affected the flight
routes from Mt Agung to the crossing points. With strong
south-westerly winds the passage was concentrated above
Amlapura, the south coast and the southern slopes of the
Seraya Range, in order to compensate for wind drift. In
these conditions the migrants crossed along the coast south
of the range, with small numbers from Mulu Point.
However, in light south-westerly winds or in the absence
of wind, a more direct route was followed, via Abang-Mt
Sega-Mt Bagas and the northern side of the range, and
most birds crossed from the coast near Kusambi (Fig. 1).
No relationship between the number of passing migrants
and wind speed or direction was evident.
Large flocks formed in thermals or in glides between
thermals, often involving hundreds of birds of the three
species mixing in soaring carousels and in long gliding
skeins. Passage of both sparrowhawks and Oriental Honey-
buzzards occurred in most weather conditions, including
heavy cloud cover and poor visibility. Migrants avoided
dense clouds, but they soared often into cumulus clouds
at the summit of thermals.
A meteorological phenomena called ‘cloud streets’
(Haugh 1975, Kerlinger 1989, Pennycuick 1998,
Bradbury 2000) occurred on certain days. Elongated
cloudy thermal zones, extending several kilometres from
Mt Agung to the Lombok Strait, provided constant
thermal lift where raptors were able to glide for kilometres
without flapping or a significant loss in altitude, apparently
enabling the crossing of the strait in a single long glide.
Flocks of 100-300 birds were common on days of
heavy passage, and single flocks of over 500 sparrowhawks
were recorded on at least two occasions (13 and 21
October) . Chinese Sparrowhawks were highly gregarious.
whilst Japanese Sparrowhawks passed mainly in singles
or small Hocks, except for a flock of over 1 50 birds on 1 3
October which was observed closely enough to identify
the species. During the last week of October this species
was also observed in flocks of up to 30 birds. The largest
flock of Oriental Honey-buzzards was 47 individuals on
23 October, whilst Booted Eagles and Peregrine Falcons
were always observed as single birds.
Large numbers of juveniles were present within flocks,
especially Chinese Sparrowhawks, but it was impossible
to establish the ratio of adults to juveniles. Owing to high
variability in the plumage pattern of Oriental Honey-
buzzards, no attempts were made to separate sex and age
classes for this species.
Hunting during migration was recorded on three
occasions. On 19 October a flock of 12 Chinese
Sparrowhawks was observed near Amlapura feeding on
swarms of termite alates (Isoptera) after a large emergence
following the first seasonal rain. On 1 5 October a Japanese
Sparrowhawk chased a juvenile Scaly-breasted Munia
Lonchura punctulata into a house in Tirtagangga but failed
to catch it. On 14 October a Peregrine Falcon captured
a feral pigeon Columba livia on Mt Sega and carried it for
at least 8 km as it flew to the coast.
A roost site previously located by Imansyah etal. (2002)
was visited on the evening of 12 October. At this site, in
a secondary forest on the south-west slopes of Mt Agung
near the temple of Pura Gelap (08°22/S 115°27'E) at
996 m, 52 Chinese Sparrowhawks were observed roosting
in trees. Local people acknowledged the regular presence
of roosting sparrowhawks during the migration months,
but denied that any trapping occurs at this site.
The bird market in Denpasar was visited twice (18
and 31 October) during peak migration, in order to
determine if any trade in migrant raptors occurred. On 3 1
October one juvenile Chinese Sparrowhawk in good
health, apparently trapped in Bali, was for sale at
Rp. 150,000 (c.£8). However, all of the local residents
interviewed near the watch sites were unaware of the
migration, suggesting a low level of local interest in
migratory raptors.
Non-raptor species observed on migration during the
study period included large numbers of Fork-tailed Swifts
Apus pacificus and Blue-tailed Bee-eaters Merops
philippinus.
DISCUSSION
The large number of migrating raptors observed in this
study is the highest ever recorded in Indonesia during a
single season, and shows that the islands of Wallacea
support an important wintering population of eastern
Palearctic raptors.
The magnitude of the raptor migration throughout
Indonesia has been largely underestimated, and in all
previous studies in Bali and Java only a fraction of the
total autumn passage has been recorded. This can be
explained by: ( 1 ) other studies were based on partial season
counts, thus missing a significant part ofthe passage; and
(2) the watch sites used in most previous studies were not
in prominent bottleneck areas or concentration points,
resulting in a large proportion of the migrants being
overlooked. The importance of watch site selection is
exemplified by Teluk Terima, Ash’s lookout in Bali Barat
Forktail 22 (2006) Additional information on the autumn migration of raptors in east Bali, Indonesia
75
National Park (Fig. 1). From this seashore site, only a
proportion of the raptors making a landfall on Bali are
visible. Migrants cross from Java on a broad front along
several kilometres of coastline, and some reach Bali at
more southerly locations than Teluk Terima (Imansyah
et al. 2002, personal observations 2004); this partially
explains why Ash’s (1993) counts were much lower
than ours.
Numbers are strongly in agreement with totals from
other watch sites in the East Asian Flyway. During a recent
study at Chumphon, southern Thailand, DeCandido et
al. (2004) recorded 65,000 southbound Chinese and
Japanese sparrowhawks and 16,000 Oriental Honey-
buzzards. The authors estimated that ‘as many as 500,000
raptors may migrate south over Chumphon each year
between August and early December’. In autumn 1999,
494,000 migrating Chinese Sparrowhawks were observed
in southern Japan (Chong 2000), whilst in Taiwan, total
autumn counts of southbound Chinese Sparrowhawks
vary between 60,000 and 200,000 individuals (Lin and
Severinghaus 1998,D. Christie inlitt. 2006). The number
of migrants that reach Indonesia and the routes they take
remain to be determined, but it is likely that the numbers
passing over Bali exceed 100,000 individuals.
The main autumn migration corridor known over
Indonesia follows the Malacca-Sumatra-Java-Bali-Lesser
Sundas route, and most of the birds observed in east Bali
probably follow this. However, there is evidence of other
southbound corridors through the archipelago. Migrating
raptors have been recorded in the South China Sea, 500
km north-west of Borneo (Ellis etal. 1990), in Borneo and
Bawean (Simpson 1983, Davison 1997, Nijman 2004b,
Sukmantoro et al. 2005), and in north Sulawesi (Riley
1 997) . In light of the large numbers of southbound Chinese
Sparrowhawks observed in Japan and Taiwan, it is
probable that the passage over Borneo and Sulawesi might
be significantly larger than is currently known, and that
a complex system of corridors traverses the Indonesian
Archipelago, but their seasonal use by migrants remains
largely unknown.
Published records for eastern Indonesia of the three
main species are surprisingly scarce (White and Bruce
1986, Coates and Bishop 1997). This is probably a
consequence of a lack of observers, but a number of recent
new records through the region indicate an increase in
field effort (D. Bishop inlitt. 2005, N. Brickie inlitt. 2005,
M. Schellekens in litt. 2005, Trainor et al. in press).
A large proportion of migrating sparrowhawks counted
in this study remained unidentified, but because Chinese
Sparrowhawk was always the most common identified
accipiter (96% of identified sparrowhawks), it is likely
that the majority of the unidentified sparrowhawks were
also of this species. Many flocks were spotted at a distance
of several kilometres using binoculars and spotting scopes.
However, even at close range, there were problems in
separating individuals of the two species, especially within
large flocks. Substantial numbers of juvenile Chinese
Sparrowhawks were clearly identified, but, as also noted
by Riley (1997), juvenile Chinese Sparrowhawks are
similar to juvenile and female Japanese Sparrowhawks. In
certain light conditions, the diagnostic dark brown outer
primaries of juvenile Chinese Sparrowhawk were not
clearly visible, and in large soaring/gliding mixed flocks,
other diagnostic characters such as plumage, wing shape
or mode of flight (Wattel 1973, Leader and Carey 1995,
Herremans and Louette 2000, Ferguson-Lees and Christie
2001) were difficult to distinguish. Given this, Japanese
Sparrowhawks were probably often overlooked, especially
in large flocks and during hours of heavy passage. Despite
this, our observations support the conclusion that Chinese
Sparrowhawk is by far the most common migrant
sparrowhawk in Indonesia (Nijman 2004a, Germi 2005,
Nijman et al. 2006).
Monitoring the extent of the illegal trade in migratory
raptors is needed. Bird markets in the major cities of Java
and Bali should be investigated carefully during peak
migration, considering that raptors are generally kept
concealed from view at these markets.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank Dimitri van Cleemput, Karina Luyckx, Raul Boscarino
and Rik Mandjes for participating in the counts, and John Ayres for his
help atTinjalas. Colin Pennycuick provided most helpful explanations
on flight and meteorology. David Bishop, Nick Blackbeard, Nick
Brickie, Mike Carter, Mike Chong, David Christie, Victor Mason,
Mark Schellekens, Wishnu Sukmantoro, Colin Trainor and Bas van
Balen kindly provided unpublished records, relevant literature and
contacts. Vanessa Wise and Mike Thornton edited the manuscript and
the English text. Keith Bildstein, Robert DeCandido, Mike McGrady
and Ian Newton commented on the manuscript, for which we express
our thanks.
REFERENCES
Ash, J. S. (1984) Bird observations on Bali. Bull. Brir. Om. Club 104:
24-35.
Ash, J. S. (1993) Raptor migration on Bali, Indonesia. Forktail 9:
3-11.
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. (2000) Bird
census techniques. London: Academic Press.
Bildstein, K. L. and Zalles, J. I., eds. (1995) Raptor migration watch-
site manual. Kempton, U.S.A.: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary
Association.
Bildstein, K. L. and Zalles, J. I. (2005) Old World versus New World
long-distance migration in accipiters, buteos, and falcons. Pp. 154-
167 in R. Greenberg and P. P. Marra, eds. Birds of two worlds: the
ecology and evolution of migration. Baltimore, U.S . A. : Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Bradbury, T. (2000) Meteorology and flight: a pilot’s guide to weather.
London: A. & C. Black.
Chong, M. (2000) Asian raptors migration areas and population survey
(Asian Raptor M.A.P.S.): cooperative raptor migration in haze
project: autumn 1999 report summary. Asian Rap. Bull. 1: 12-15.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland, Australia: Dove Publications.
Davison, G. W. H. (1997) Bird observations on Pulau Laut, South
Kalimantan. Kukila 9: 122-125.
DeCandido, R., Nualsri, C., Allen, D. and Bildstein, K. L. (2004)
Autumn 2003 raptor migration at Chumphon, Thailand: a globally
significant raptor migration watch site. Forktail 20: 49-54.
Ellis, D. H., Kepler, A. K. and Kepler, C. B. (1990) Evidence for a fall
raptor migration pathway across the South China Sea. J. Raptor
Res. 24(1): 12-18.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
Fuller, M. R. and Mosher, J. A. (1981) Methods of detecting and
counting raptors: a review. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 235-246.
76
FRANCESCO GERMI and DONO WALUYO
Forktail 22 (2006)
Germi, F. (2005) Raptor migration in east Bali, Indonesia: observations
from a bottleneck watch site. Forktail 21: 93-98.
Haugh, J. R. (1975) Local ephemeral weather conditions and their
effects on hawk migration routes. Pp. 72-84 in M. Harwood, ed.
Proceedings of the North American Hawk Migration Conference 1 974.
Washington, U.S.A.: Hawk Migration Association of North
America.
Herremans, M. and Louette, M. (2000) A partial post-juvenile molt
and transitional plumage in the Shikra ( Accipiter badius ) and Grey
Frog Hawk {Accipiter soloensis). J. Raptor Res. 34(4): 249-261.
Imansyah, M. J., Purwandana, D., Oni, P. B., Andrian, N. and
Sudaryanto (2002) Estimasi jalur migrasi burung raptor migrant
Asia di Bali [Estimating the migration path of Asian migratory
raptors in Bali]. Unpublished report. (In Indonesian).
Kerlinger, P. (1989). Flight strategies of migrating haioks. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Lane, B. A. and Parish, D. (1991) A review of the Asian-Australasian
bird migration system. Pp. 291-312 in T. Salathe, ed. Conserving
migratory > birds. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird
Preservation. (ICBP Technical Publication No. 12).
Leader, P. J. and Carey, G. J. (1995) Identification of Japanese
Sparrowhawk and Besra. Hong Kong Bird Report 1994: 157-169.
Lin, W. H. and Sevennghaus, L. L. (1998) Raptor migration and
conservation in Taiwan. Pp. 631-639 in R. D. Chancellor, B.-U.
Meyburg and J. J. Ferrero, eds. Holarctic birds of prey. Merida,
Spain: ADENEX and World Working Group on Birds of Prey.
Mason, V. N. (1994) Raptors en route. Tjerutjuk, Bull. Bali Bird Club
2(3): 6.
Nijman, V. (2001a) Autumn migration of raptors on Java, Indonesia:
composition, direction and behaviour. Ibis 143: 99-106.
Nijman, V. (2001b) Spatial and temporal variation in migrant raptors
on Java, Indonesia. Emu 101: 259-263.
Nijman, V. (2004a) Magnitude and timing of migrant raptors in central
Java, Indonesia. Ardea 92(2): 161-168.
Nijman, V. (2004b) Survey on birds of prey and owls (Falconiformes
and Strigiformes) on Bawean, Java Sea, with records of three species
new to the island. Raffles Bull. Zool. 52(2): 647-651.
Nijman, V., Germi , F. and van Balen, B. (2006) Relative status of two
species of migrant sparrowhawks on Java and Bali, Indonesia. Emu
106(2): 157-162.
Nuraeni, S. and Suparman, U. (2000) Raptor migration at Puncak
and Cibulao, West Java, Indonesia: October and November 1999.
Asian Rap. Bull. 1: 7-9.
Pennycuick, C. J. (1998) Field observations of thermals and thermal
streets, and the theory of cross-country soaring flight. J. Avian
Biol. 29: 33-43.
Riley, J. (1997) The birds of Sangihe and Talaud, North Sulawesi.
Kukila 9: 3-36.
Simpson, D. M. (1983) Autumn migration of land birds off North
Borneo in 1981. Sea Swallow 32: 48-53.
Sukmantoro, W., Suparman, U. and Wen Sin, L. (2005) A study on
migratory raptors in Sumatra, Kalimantan, Java, Bali and Nusa
Tenggara, Indonesia: 2001-2004. Report presented at the Fourth
Symposium on Asian Raptors. Taiping, Malaysia: ARRCN and
Malaysian Nature Society.
Trainor, C. R., Benstead, P. J., Martin, K., Lesmana, D., Agista, D.,
Benstead, M. C., Drijvers, R. and Setiawan, I. (in press) New bird
records for Nusa Tenggara islands: Moyo, Sumbawa, Sumba,
Flores, Pulau Besar and Timor. Kukila 13.
Wattel, J. (1973) Geographical differentiation in the genus Accipiter.
Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A: Nuttall Ornithological Club.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sundas Islands, Indonesia) : an
annotated check-list . London: British Ornithologists’ Union (Check¬
list 7).
Zalles, J. I. and Bildstein, K. L. (2000) Raptor watch: a global directory
of raptor migration sites. Cambridge, U.K. and Kempton, U.S.A. :
BirdLife International and Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Francesco Germi, 46 (2F2) Elm Row, Edinburgh EH7 4AH, Scotland, U.K. Email: Francesco@germi.freeserve.co.uk
Dono Waluyo, Jl. Angrek I no. 9, Amlapura, Bali, Indonesia.
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 77-84
New records and other observations of birds on the
island of Tablas, Romblon province, Philippines
DESMOND ALLEN
During six visits to the island of Tablas, Romblon province, Philippines, totalling 41 days during 1998-2002, I recorded 97 species
including 23 new species for the island. I observed many of the endemic subspecies of which the two most distinct — Streak-breasted
Bulbul Ixos siquijorensis cinereiceps and Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus menagei — may warrant specific status. I recorded the
following species of conservation interest: Philippine Duck Anas luzonica (Vulnerable), Blue-naped Parrot Tanygnathus lucionensis (Near
Threatened), Mantanani Scops Owl Otus mantananensis (Near Threatened), Rufous-lored Kingfisher Todiramphus winchelli (Vulnerable)
and Streak-breasted Bulbul (Endangered).
INTRODUCTION
The Philippines are well known for their high number
(and proportion) of threatened and endemic bird species
(BirdLife International 2001). However, until relatively
recently, little attention has been paid to subspecies. Collar
(1997, 2003) drew attention to the problem of taxa that
had been reduced from species to subspecies status with
scant study at a time when such lumping seemed preferable .
He pointed out how such distinct but lumped forms now
provide a problem for conservationists when legislation
and priorities usually operate only at the species level.
There are many such obviously distinct forms in the
Philippines, and some less obvious, but the present-day
status of many of the 708+ endemic subspecies scattered
through the Philippine archipelago remains little known.
For example, four endemic subspecies are considered
restricted to just Tablas or Tablas and Romblon, but
there had been no recent studies on either of these islands.
None of these subspecies has been considered a full species
in recent literature, although three taxa are particularly
distinct: Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus menagei
and Blue-headed Fantail Rhipidura cyaniceps sauli , both
restricted to Tablas, and Streak-breasted Bulbul Ixos
siquijorensis cinereiceps , which is known from both Tablas
and Romblon. Other taxa restricted to Tablas, or Tablas
and other small islands, include Orange-bellied
Flowerpecker Dicaeum trigonostigma cnecolaemum,
Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima haemacephala homochroa,
Rufous-lored Kingfisher Todiramphus winchelli
nesydrionetes and Mantanani Scops Owl Otus
mantananensis romblonis.
Of all these local endemics, the long-and-curvy-tailed
Spangled Drongo is particularly distinctive and had
apparently not been seen for many years, leading Collar
(1997) to speculate that it was ‘alas, probably already
extinct’ . His article was one stimulus for me to visit Tablas
and look for this bird.
Geography
Tablas lies east of Mindoro and just north of Boracay and
Panay, at 1 2°24'N 1 22°02'E. At 686 km2, it is the largest
of the three main islands of Romblon province, the other
two being Romblon (82 km2) and Sibuyan (449 km2).
The three islands are separated by deep water except for
the northern ends of Romblon and Tablas, which are
connected by a submarine bar at a depth of less than 50 m.
Romblon and Tablas appear never to have had a land
connection with Sibuyan or with the neighbouring larger
islands such as the Visayas, Mindoro or Luzon (Heaney
1985).
Tablas was described as a ‘well-wooded island’ at the
turn of the nineteenth century (Worcester and Bourns
1898), but now most low-lying areas are cultivated with
rice paddies, and hilly areas have been converted to rough
pasture or coconut plantation, although some steep valleys
are still wooded. At the north end lies a rugged karst
outcrop called Tablas Peak (665 m). There is no surface
water over most of this, and while patchy forest remains,
it is mostly stunted secondary growth. T o the west lies Mt
Figure 1. Map showing locations on Tablas island. Shading denotes
forest according to a DENR map.
78
DESMOND ALLEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
Payapau (44 1 m), also karst, and on which heavily logged
forest with only a few large trees remains.
The largest area of remaining forest now lies in the
centre of the northern part of the island, around
and between Mt Palaupau (585 m) and Mt Progreso (c.640
m). This is labelled on maps as the Burburanan Forest. In
1998, most of the forest on the western slopes of Mt
Palaupau was regenerating and only 3-5 m high, but on
the summit at c.550 m and on its steep, south-eastern
slope there was still some original forest >10 m high. At
least 100 ha of tall forest extends along the ridge running
south from Mt Progreso, overlooking San Agustin
(formerly Badajoz) . The main ridge, with a height generally
above 450 m, continues south, parallel to the east coast for
about two-thirds of the length of the island, sloping steeply
to the coastal plain. Near Ferrol there are some very rugged,
low hills, some with almost impenetrable secondary forest,
but most areas have been cleared. The areas around Looc
appeared denuded, including the high points of Mt Lunas
(c.480 m) and Mt Malbug (277 m). Although maps at the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) office at Odiongan indicate many widely scattered
reserve forests, few appear to be larger than 100 ha. None
in the south of the island is thought to retain mature forest.
METHODS
I visited Tablas on the following dates: 31 August-
3 September 1998 (based at Odiongan on the west coast);
31 August and 2-3 September 1998 (forest east of the
Sicop Bridge); 2 1-23 March 1999 (based at San Agustin);
2-13 August 1999 (Odiongan, San Agustin, Ferrol and
Guinawayan); 6-16 August 200 1 (accompanying a team
led by Marisol Pedregosa to the Dobdoban and Balogo
areas); 25-29 March 2002 (Odiongan and San Agustin
areas); and 31 July-5 August 2002 (hills south-west of
San Agustin; also Mt Payapau and Tablas Peak). In total
I spent c.41 days in the field, with typically 10-12 hours
observations per day. Birds were sought in all habitats
visited, but were principally looked for in forest, using
binoculars, a microphone and minidisc recorder, and on
occasions a telescope. Playback of recorded song was used
sometimes to confirm the identity of a bird, and sound
recordings were made. Where possible, birds were also
photographed with a camera and/or digital video camera.
The majority of records below are substantiated by video,
sound recordings and/or photographs.
RESULTS
A total of 97 species was recorded, including 23 new
records for the island (taking the distributions given by
Kennedy et al. [2000] as a baseline), and five threatened
and Near Threatened species (as listed in BirdLife
International 2001): Philippine Duck Anas luzonica
(Vulnerable), Blue-naped Parrot Tanygnathus lucionensis
(Near Threatened), Mantanani Scops Owl (Near
Threatened), Rufous-lored Kingfisher (Vulnerable),
Streak-breasted Bulbul (Endangered). The selected
species accounts below provide details for new records
for the islands, endemic taxa and threatened and Near
Threatened species. Trinominals are given where
observations relate to an identified subspecies.
Little Egret Egretta garzetta
New island record: five birds were seen feeding in newly
created, almost empty fishponds on the south side of
Odiongan town on 27 March 2002. Two had yellow feet
and the others black feet. The former were presumably of
the subspecies garzetta, and the latter may have been of
the subspecies nigripes (see Hancock and Kushlan 1984).
GREAT Egret Casmerodius albus
New island record: four birds were present with Little
Egrets in the empty fishponds south of Odiongan on 27
March 2002.
Philippine Duck Anas luzonica
Vulnerable. This species was reported by local people as
occurring regularly (in flocks of up to 100-200 birds) on
the coast c.3 km north of Odiongan, and 12 birds were
observed there on 31 July 2002. J. Willis (in litt. 2004)
also reported the species from Looc Bay on 26 July 200 1 .
BLACK-SHOULDERED IvITE Elanus caeruleus
New island record: a lone adult was seen (also by L.
Paguntalan and M. Pedregosa) on an exposed tree on a hill
2 km south of Calatrava on 1 1 August 2001. This species
is now rarely recorded in the Philippines (Kennedy et al.
2000).
Barred Buttonquail Tumix suscitator
New island record: single birds were seen in the areas of
Sicop Bridge, Cogon and Sogod.
BARRED Rail Gallirallus torquatus
New island record: probably widespread as it was seen in
the Cogon, Carmen and Odiongan areas.
Slaty-legged Crake Rallina eurizonoides
New island record: two birds were seen well 2 September
1998 on a trail to the summit of the hill east of Sicop Bridge.
White-breasted Waterhen Amauromis phoenicurus
New island record: two birds were seen in a seasonally wet
area of tall weeds between bushes and rice fields c. 1 km
north of Odiongan on 26 March 2002.
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva
New island record: 1 4 birds were seen, some coming into
breeding plumage, in one of the dried-up fishponds south
of Odiongan on 27 March 2002.
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
New island record: at least ten individuals were seen in
dried-up fishponds south of Odiongan on 27 March 2002.
RED TURTLE Dove Streptopelia tranquebarica
New island record: a large flock of doves, including about
20 of this species along with Spotted Doves Streptopelia
chinensis and Zebra Doves Geopelia striata , were seen
feeding in a field of newly sown rice south of Ferrol on 5
August 1999.
SPOTTED Dove Streptopelia chinensis
New island record: this species is probably widespread; at
least 20 birds were feeding in a dove flock south of Ferrol
on 5 August 1 999, and three individuals were seen in rice
fields north of Odiongan on 27 March 2002.
Forktail 22 (2006) New records and other observations of birds on the island of Tablas, Philippines
79
Pink-necked Green Pigeon Treron vemans
New island record: this species is probably widespread as
it was seen in the Dobdoban, Ferrol, Odiongan and
Cawayan areas during 1999-2002.
BLUE-NAPED PARROT Tanygnathus lucionensis
Near Threatened. Two captive immatures seen on 3 1 July
2002 had recently been caught in the forest above Sogod.
MANTANANI SCOPS OWL Otus mantananensis romblonis
Near Threatened; restricted-range. This species seems to
be common in the coconut palms around San Agustin,
with ten individuals being heard along the road to
Dobdoban on 4 August 2002. It was reported to be
common near Odiongan, although I never heard it in that
area. My guide, R. Montesa, showed me an open nest of
this species at the base of a leaf in the crown of a coconut
palm on 29 March 2002; one bird was sitting on two eggs.
The subspecies romblonis has so far only been recorded
on Banton, Romblon, Semirara, Sibuyan, Tablas and
Tres Reyes. The calls are similar to those of the subspecies
mantananensis and sibutuensis.
GRASS Owl Tyto capensis
New island record: a single captive bird was shown to me
at a house north of Odiongan on 26 March 2002; the
owners insisted that it had been caught there the night
before.
PURPLE Needletail Hirundapus celebensis
New island record: up to ten were seen from San Agustin
town on 7 and 9 August 1999, possibly on migration or
post-breeding dispersal.
Rufous-lored Kingfisher
Todiramphus winchelli nesydrionetes
Vulnerable. This species seems quite widespread and fairly
frequent in those areas retaining original forest, and it was
seen or heard on many visits to the Dobdoban watershed.
It also seems to persist further north, as a single bird was
heard calling in heavily degraded karst forest on Mt
Payapao, Sogod, on 2 August 2002. Little seems to have
been published regarding the behaviour of this species.
One bird was observed giving a single note alarm call,
and, just as in Collared Kingfisher T. chloris , it cocked its
tail at a right-angle to its back when the call-note was
delivered. A female was heard making a sound rather like
a woodpecker and was seen tapping a branch while holding
a 20-mm long beetle in its bill, possibly hitting it to break
open the carapace. The nest of this species has never been
reported (Fry and Fry 1 992, Kennedy 2000) : R. Montesa
(verbally 2001) stated that it nests in arboreal termitaria,
as has been reported for Collared Kingfisher.
Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus
New island record: five birds were seen over paddyfields
in the Ferrol area on 4 August 1999. Two individuals
were also seen over rice fields north of Odiongan on 26
March 2002.
Coppersmith Barbet
Megalaima haemacephala homochroa
This species was frequently heard in forested areas on
T ablas but never seen. The subspecies homochroa is known
with certainty only from Tablas, but it almost certainly
also occurred on Romblon (and perhaps still occurs there),
and probably also on Masbate. Dziadosz and Parkes
( 1 984) opined, when describing homochroa , that the only
known specimens from Masbate were those of McGregor,
but that they had been destroyed during World War II.
However, a male specimen collected by McGregor on 2 1
June 1902 survives in the Smithsonian Institution,
Washington D.C. (USNM 1 92589). Photographs of this
specimen appear to match the description of homochroa ,
although more detailed examination is necessary to
confirm this.
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica
New island record: this species was common in the San
Agustin area in March 1999, and single birds were seen
in the same area in August 1999. At least four were seen
near Odiongan on 25 March 2002.
Pacific Swallow Hirundo tahitica
New island record: this species was seen in many parts of
the island during most visits, e.g. at least 50 were hawking
over paddyfields north of Odiongan on 25 March 2002.
Streak-breasted Bulbul Ixos siquijorensis cinereiceps
Endangered; restricted-range. The subspecies cinereiceps
was fairly common in primary and logged forest at Balogo,
and very common above Dobdoban, calling from trees
within cultivated areas that were surrounded by native
forest. It was absent from areas without native forest, but
occurred in very degraded forest around Ferrol, and two
birds were heard in low secondary growth on the hill east
of Sicop Bridge. It is not clear, though, whether the species
was successfully breeding in these areas or had dispersed
there from more suitable habitat.
Three subspecies are known: cinereiceps from Tablas
and Romblon, monticola from Cebu, and siquijorensis from
Siquijor. The former seems to be almost extinct on
Romblon (personal observations) . Baud (1976) compared
two female specimens from Romblon with two from T ablas
and noted differences in wing size, head colour and
contrast of the belly, but further study is needed to
determine the distinctiveness of these birds.
I. s. monticola is 30% shorter than cinereiceps : 21-22
cm versus 27-29 cm, while siquijorensis is intermediate at
24-25 cm (males larger in each case; values for monticola
and cinereiceps are taken from Bourns and Worcester
[1894]; values for siquijorensis are taken from skins at the
Natural History Museum, Tring [NHM]). Adult
cinereiceps are olive -brown above and whitish below; the
crown feathers are tipped ashy-grey but do not seem to
form a crest even when the birds are agitated; the chin,
throat and centre of the breast are white, while the upper
breast and breast-sides are light olive-brown with distinct
white shaft markings . Only three old specimens of monticola
exist, and only one bird has been captured and
photographed. The bird appears similar to cinereiceps, but
with a blackish cast to the crown, a fulvous tone to the
upperparts and a less striking white throat. I. s. siquijorensis
is olive-brown above, with streaked underparts and a
blackish-brown crown and nape, of which the crown
feathers are often raised to form a small peaked crest; the
fringes of the median and greater coverts are paler edged,
producing two indistinct wing-bars. These wing-bars are
visible in all four specimens in NHM, and in all photos
taken in August on Siquijor, but are absent in the other
80
DESMOND ALLEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
two subspecies. The small feathers of the lower chin and
throat have whitish centres aligned as stripes, so the throat
does not appear bright white; as the feathers increase in
size down the underside the stripes become mottled bands.
The three subspecies differ in many of their
vocalisations. I. s. cinereiceps has a variety of calls which
include ‘squeaky toy’ notes, both falling and rising at a
variety of pitches; it also gives chree or chirree notes which
vary in their grating quality and seem similar to those of
siquijorensis. A commonly heard phrase is chirit choroyroy
or chree choroyroy , which may have other phrases put
around it; e.g. hihohi-chirit-choroyroy chirit choroyroy
chiREEEchroyroy chiREEEchroyroy. The territorial song
seems to be based around a pattern of typical bulbul notes:
hi-ho-h i-gh rrek -gh rregh rrek-s i-rrediyeray . This lasts about
2.5 seconds and the last phrase may be omitted. Other
phrases include a clearer chirikruk chirikruk reerik-nimk ,
and chirarache chirarache chirinchree-ririru. A repeated chi —
chi — chi — chi may be an alarm call. I. s. siquijorensis has a
typically rasping, grating quality to its calls, with chree and
chichaw calls which may resemble those of cinereiceps , and
occasional ‘squeaky toy’ squeals. The song appears to be
a 2.5 second chichachichachichaCHI-CHA-CHI-CHA, or
chichachichachichaCHREE-CHRA W CHREE CHRA IV,
reminiscent of a rusty saw, and the last notes being louder
and slightly wider-spaced (c.0.3 seconds long, separated
by 0.1 second). I. s. monticola co-occurs with Philippine
Bulbul Ixos philippinus, and it is very difficult to be sure
which vocalisations belong to which species: I relied on
the knowledge of a local guide. I. s. monticola produces
distinctly low-pitched rasping calls, especially in response
to playback, possibly to distinguish itself from the high-
pitched squeaky calls of Philippine Bulbul. However, when
the rasping calls of siquijorensis were played back, only
Philippine Bulbul seemed to respond. Although no songs
similar to that of cinereiceps or siquijorensis were heard, the
territorial song was not recorded.
Given these differences in morphology and
vocalisations, the taxonomic status of these three
subspecies should be reviewed.
Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus menagei
In March 1999, two birds were seen in the mid-canopy of
tall trees over a stream that flows through Dobdoban;
they were present on two successive days and seem likely
to have been a pair. In August 1999, again in the same
general area above Dobdoban, 2-3 family parties of 2-4
birds were seen. These parties were quite active, but the
birds with more developed tails — presumably adults-
tended to be shyer. In August 2001, only one immature
was seen with an adult. Two single adults were also seen
on Mt Palapau (M. Pedregosa and L. Paguntalan verbally
2001). In March 2002, one was seen and another heard
during two days in the forest above Dobdoban. In August
2002, a single bird, probably an immature, was seen in
low secondary forest on Tablas Peak, and recognised by
our local guide, who said the species was rare there. The
species was almost always seen in relatively mature, closed-
canopy forest. On only one occasion were birds seen in a
tree at the edge of a clearing, feeding actively in a manner
more typical of mainland Spangled Drongo. Birds were
never seen in open areas.
These are the first observations for many decades of
the subspecies menagei, which is endemic to Tablas. It is
very distinctive in having a very long and very deeply
forked tail that curves widely outwards and somewhat
upwards. Although it has spangles on the breast, these are
small and few in number; the neck hackles are small. The
metallic feathers of the crown do not extend to the nape
as they do in its nearest geographical relatives D. h.
palawanensis and D. h. cuyensis, but like these two, and
unlike D. h. bomeensis of Romeo, it lacks frontal filaments
on the forehead. Bourns and Worcester (1894) originally
described this form as Chibia menagei. Hachisuka (1928)
considered it sufficiently distinct to deserve its own genus
Dicrachibia. Inskipp etal. (1996) followed the arrangement
proposed by Delacour and Mayr (1946) and supported
by Vaurie (1949), including menagei within a very broad
Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus complex comprising
32 subspecies, whose characteristics include spangles on
the breast and a lack of gloss on the mantle. None of these
forms occurs on the large islands nearest to Tablas, i.e.
Mindoro, Panay and Luzon, where they are replaced by
the glossy-backed Balicassiao D. balicassius.
In the field, the flight feathers and tail of menagei wove
somewhat glossy, with a slight greenish or purplish
iridescence. The belly, back, nape and sides of the head
sometimes seemed dull black, but in better light could be
seen to have a purple tinge to them; they were velvety
rather than glossy. There were some slight spangles on
the sides of the neck but these were not very noticeable.
The tail feathers of adults curl outwards. On some birds
they appeared flat, but one bird in a group had very
elongated tail feathers that curled up towards their tips
like a partial helix. An immature had a splayed end to the
tail, and had yet to grow the elongated outer feathers;
video footage shows that it seems to have a brownish-
black head and underparts, and iridescent blue-black back
and wings.
Both Spangled Drongo and Balicassiao, as with many
other species of drongos, are well known for the range of
sounds they can produce, but D. h. menagei seemed not
to be very vocal. On some occasions, birds were quite shy
and mostly silent, although from time to time they gave
a very cicada-like, rasping gzzzzzzt, recalling a metal comb
being scratched. This call lasted about one second and
was uttered at irregular intervals of 2-10 seconds.
Occasionally birds gave a rasping dzak-tsee-ik , which was
similar to a call of White-vented Whistler Pachycephala
homeyeri. On another occasion two birds were recorded
duetting 30 m apart, with the dzak-tsee-ik call being
answered with a jieeh call. Birds occasionally approached
in response to playback of the dzak-tsee-ik call. On another
occasion an immature called incessantly with squealing
notes that seemed to be a begging call.
The only recording in the British Library National
Sound Archive of a nearby form of Spangled Drongo is
that of D. h. palawanensis (by R. Drijvers; recording
number 67523). This sounds similar but is nevertheless
distinct: a ‘comb-scratching’ call is followed by a hoarse
whistled pisheel It is unclear if the latter is the same bird
or a reply. None of the piercing whistles so characteristic
of Spangled Drongo over much of its range, and of
Balicassiao, were heard from birds on Tablas. However,
it remains possible that other typical Spangled Drongo-
type songs and calls may be made at times of the year
other than those of my visits.
One bird of a pair flicked its flat scissor-like tail up and
out, perhaps nervously, every 1-3 seconds, while the other
sat motionlessly, apparently watching me, for at least ten
Forktail 22 (2006) New records and other observations of birds on the island of Tablas, Philippines
81
minutes. Calling birds were several times observed to
open and close their tails like scissors while giving the
dzee-ik call. Two groups were observed foraging in vine
tangles like coucals, apparently feeding on insects in dead
leaves. Individuals sometimes held a dead leaf with one
foot, hung on to the vine with the other foot, and stripped
out insects with their bill.
Given its morphological distinctiveness and apparent
differences in voice, behaviour and habitat preferences
from other forms of Spangled Drongo, menage i must be
a strong candidate for regaining full species status.
PIED Bushchat Saxicola caprata
New island record: several singles were seen east of Sicop
Bridge, atFerrolandatGuinawayanon 1-5 August 1999.
Golden-bellied Gerygone Gerygone sulphurea
New island record: birds were seen and heard in mangroves
and secondary forest south of Ferrol, south of Odiongan
and also in the north of the island.
White-vented Whistler Pachycephala homeyeri
This taxon was frequent in native forest and remnant
forest pockets. When Parkes (1989) revised and split
‘White-bellied Whistler’ Pachycephala homeyeri from
Mangrove Whistler P. grisola, he commented that the
Tablas and Sibuyan populations that he placed with P.
homeyeri could conceivably be separated as a subspecies
distinct from winchelli and major on size. Further studies
are needed to determine the distinctiveness of these birds,
and molecular studies would help to clarify the
relationships between all forms in the cinerea group.
Long-tailed Shrike Lanins schach
New island record: single birds were seen near Sicop Bridge
on 1 September 1998, on the hills west of San Agustin
and also between Ferrol and Guinagoman on 4-5 August
1999, and in the Sogod area on 2 August 2002. Birds
showed the black cap typical of L. s. nasutus, but also very
considerable variation in the amount of rufous and grey
in the plumage: on one bird the grey covered almost all
the back and there was little rufous on the flanks; another
bird had a largely rufous back, the grey being restricted to
the upper back, and extensive rufous on the flanks.
Specimens of L. s. nasutus in NHM show similar variation,
but this is not mentioned by Lefranc and Worfolk (1997).
These records fill a gap in the distribution illustrated in
Lefranc and Worfolk (1997).
BLUE-HEADED Fantail Rhipidura cyaniceps sauli
This species was fairly common in native forest in the
Balogo-Dobdoban region, and it was also seen on Tablas
Peak. A pair seemed to be defending a territory and feeding
young near Dobdoban on 22-23 March 2002. The
subspecies sauli i s endemic to Tablas. The calls were lower
in pitch than those of the nominate subspecies on Luzon ,
but the territorial song has not yet been recorded. More
research is needed on the distinctness of this form from
the other much smaller forms on Luzon and the West
Visayas.
Orange-bellied Flowerpecker
Dicaeum trigonostigma cnecolaemum
This species was fairly common in native forest and
adjacent secondary vegetation in the Balogo-Dobdoban
area, and was also present on Tablas Peak, and forest east
of Sicop Bridge.
The subspecies cnecolaemum is endemic to Tablas.
Bourns and Worcester ( 1 894) wrote in the type description
of D. t. intermedium (type locality Romblon): ‘It may
ultimately prove that the Tablas birds are distinct, the
four specimens secured by us in that island having a much
heavier wash of yellow on the throat than the Romblon
birds’. However, in his type description of cnecolaemum
(type locality: Tablas), Parkes (1989) wrote: ‘Similar to
D. t. of Romblon Island, but adult males with
throat washed with yellow instead of being pale neutral
gray [sic]... immature males have chins distinctly yellow
rather than gray as in intermedium’’ (my italics). Cheke et
al. (200 1 ) did not clear up this confusion and stated that
cnecolaemum ‘differs from intermedium by throat washed
yellow rather than pale, neutral grey’ but for intermedium
stated ‘chin and throat pale[r] grey, washed with yellow’.
Photographs of the type specimen in the USNM and of
living birds on Tablas indicate cnecolaemum has a faint
wash of yellow mainly on the chin and upper throat. A
photograph of the intermedium type specimen seems to
show only pale grey, although a yellow wash too faint to
see in the field or in images may be present. Further work
is needed to establish whether the populations on these
adjacent islands really do differ.
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus
New island record: this species now seems to be frequent
in all of the main towns visited: Odiongan, San Agustin,
Looc, Ferrol, Carmen and the north-east coastal villages.
JAVA Sparrow Lonchura oryzivora
New island record: a single bird was seen east of Odiongan
near Sicop Bridge in an area of pasture and cultivation on
31 August 1998. No others were seen on return trips to
this area in August 1999 and 2001. In March 2002, a
flock of at least 50 birds including many immatures was
found in bushes by paddyfields c. 2 km north of Odiongan;
and on 3 1 July 2002, a small flock of at least four birds was
found north of San Agustin near Carmen. J. Willis (in litt.
2005) also reported seeing this species at Looc on 27 Julv
2001.
Unconfirmed records
A single snipe, probably Swinhoe’s Snipe Gallinago megala,
was flushed three times from a damp patch of pasture east
of Sicop Bridge on 1 September 1998. It appeared rather
large and flew slowly and directly before landing. Twice
it landed close by and on the third time flew off a longer
distance. It did not show a white trailing edge to the wing
and uttered a single low grrrk on two occasions.
In addition, three species were heard, but not seen and
remain unconfirmed: (1) Pink-bellied Imperial Pigeon
Ducula poliocephala: at least two birds were heard and
recorded giving a distinctive double boom from ridgetop
trees above Dobdoban in August 200 1 , and another was
heard at Balogo, in August 2002; (2) Philippine Nightjar
Caprimulgus manillensis : several birds were heard giving
the characteristic chock-chorr call at midnight in the
Dobdoban valley on 29 March 2002; R. Montesa, who
was accompanying me, recognised this as the nightbird
known locally as ‘tok-tor’, which he said nests on the
ground laying a dirty-white egg with brown spots; (3)
unidentified hawk owl Ninox sp.: the calls of an apparent
82
DESMOND ALLEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
hawk owl, probably Philippine Hawk Owl Ninox
philippensis of the subspecies spilonota, were heard regularly
and recorded around the campsite at Dobdoban, and
occasionally at Balogo. Unfortunately the birds stayed in
the canopy and became silent when a recording was played
back to them; the vocalisations were somewhat similar to
some of the other forms in the N. [p.] spilonota group,
notably mindorensis and the Cebuan spilonota.
Additional notes
A specimen of uncertain identity — either Rusty-breasted
Cuckoo Cacomantis sepulcralis or Plaintive Cuckoo C.
mend inns — is mentioned in Dickinson etal. (1991). This
specimen was located in the Philippine National Museum
(specimen number 4825 collected 25 May 1954 by T.
Oane) with an original label indicating C. memlinus, but
was confirmed as Rusty-breasted Cuckoo.
The following records for Tablas, overlooked when
Kennedy et al. (2000) was compiled (E. C. Dickinson
verbally 2005), are listed in Goodman et al. (1995: 46-
47), and were confirmed by sight observations on Tablas:
Philippine DuckLbtas luzonica , Zebra Dove Geopelia striata
striata, Yellow-breasted Fruit Dove Ptilinopus occipitalis,
Pygmy Swiftlet Collocalia troglodytes and Large-billed Crow
Coruus macrorhynchos philippinus.
A record of Philippine Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx melanurus
on Tablas has appeared in print three times (Collar et al.
1999, BirdLife International 2001, Mallari et al. 2001).
This refers to a specimen (055945) in the DMNH, which,
although once thought to have originated at Looc, T ablas
in February 1976, was actually collected at Looc, Lubang
island (G. Hess in litt. 1999).
DISCUSSION
The 23 new records for Tablas represent a 20% increase
in the island’s known avifauna. Most of the winter migrants
to the Philippines could reasonably be expected to turn
up on any island containing suitable habitat: swallows, in
particular, are not at all unexpected. However, of the new
records, 15 are almost certainly resident species. Although
the island does not support tits, woodpeckers or babblers,
it does not seem to be as impoverished as previously
thought. Some of the additions may be recent arrivals,
e.g. Eurasian Tree Sparrow, Spotted Dove and Zebra
Dove may have followed habitat modification by humans.
Many of the others, such as Slaty-legged Crake, Barred
Rail, White-breasted Waterhen, Pink-necked Green
Pigeon and Golden-bellied Gerygone would appear simply
to have been overlooked. Further resident species may
yet be discovered.
Although the Philippine Cockatoo Cacatua
haematuropygia was formerly known to occur on Tablas,
no evidence was found for its continued survival there.
However, there are some areas marked on DENR maps
as being forest that have yet to be surveyed.
More studies are needed of the endemic taxa and their
relatives to establish if any merit recognition as full species,
in particular: the drongos on Tablas, Cuyo and Palawan;
the three subspecies of Blue-headed Fantail, Philippine
Hawk Owl throughout its range; and Streak-breasted
Bulbul on Tablas and Cebu. Elevation of any of the
endemic subspecies to species status would have
implications for conservation priorities, as they have
restricted ranges and are threatened by habitat loss. A
paper addressing conservation issues on Tablas is in
preparation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would particularly like to thank Rodel Montesa, Resty Rubas, Johnny
Galan, and ‘Johnny’ for their cheerful and helpful guiding during the
various trips, and the survey team of Sol Pedregosa, Lisa-Marie
Paguntalan, Mery-Jean C. Gadiana, Reginaldo G. Bueno, Fortunato
‘Nong Nati’ Catalbas, Reynaldo ‘Rey’ Lepangue; also the Zoological
Society for the Conservation of Species and Populations (ZGAP) in
Munich for helping finance the visit in 1999; Krys Kazmierczak; Tom
Brooks for helpful comments on early drafts; Edward Dickinson for
significant helpful editorial input; Nigel Collar (BirdLife International)
for encouragement; William Oliver (FFI) and Sadao Ishimura for
support; Robert Prys-Jones, Mark Adams and Effie Warr (NHM) for
help in access to the specimens and publications; Sweepea Veluz for
help in locating specimens at the Philippine National Museum; Gene
Hess (Delaware Museum of Natural History) for supplying unpublished
data on the collections; Chris Milensky (Smithsonian Institution) for
supplying images of specimens; and Jake Willis for his records and for
a helpful review of the paper.
REFERENCES
Baud, F. J. (1976) Oiseauxdes Philippines de la collection W. Parsons.
I. Cebu, Samar, Romblon, Tablas et Sibuyan. Rev. Suisse Zool. 83:
497-513.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International
Bourns, F. S. and Worcester, D. C. (1894) Preliminary notes on the
birds and mammals collected by the Menage Scientific Expedition
to the Philippine Islands. Occas. Pap. Minn. Acad. Nat. Sci. 1:
25-26.
Cheke, R. A., Mann, C. F. and Allen., R. A. (2001) Sunbirds: a guide
to the sunbirds, flowerpeckers, spiderhunters, and sugarbirds of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
Collar, N. J. (1997) Taxonomy and conservation: chicken and egg.
Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 117: 122-136
Collar, N. J. (2003) How many bird species are there in Asia? Oriental
Bird Club Bull. 38: 20-30
Collar, N. J., Mallari, A. and Tabaranza, B. (1999) Threatened birds of
the Philippines. Manila: Bookmark, Inc.
Delacour, J. and Mayr, E. (1946) Birds of the Philippines. New York:
Macmillan.
Delacour, J. and Mayr, E. (1945) Notes on the taxonomy of the birds
of the Philippines. Zoologica 30: 105-1 17.
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (19919 The birds
of the Philippines: an annotated checklist. Tring, U.K.: British
Ornithologists’ Union (Checklist 12).
Dziadosz, V. M. and Parkes, K. C. (1984) Two new Philippine
subspecies of the Crimson-Breasted Barbet (Aves: Capitonidae).
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 97(4): 788-791.
Dupont, J. E. (1971) Philippine birds. Greenville, U.S.A.: Delaware
Museum of Natural History.
Fry, C. H. and Fry, K. (1992) Kingfishers, bee-eaters and rollers: a
handbook. London: Christopher Helm.
Goodman, S. M., Willard, D. E., and Gonzales, P. C. (1995) The
birds of Sibuyan Island, Romblon province, Philippines, with
particular reference to elevational distribution and biogeographic
affinities. Fieldiana Zool. 82: 1-57.
Forktail 22 (2006) New records and other observations of birds on the island of Tablas, Philippines
83
Hachisuka, M. (1928) Notes on some oriental birds. Tori 5: 19-24.
Hancock, J. and Kushlan, J. (1984) The herons handbook. Beckenham,
U.K.; Croom Helm
Heaney, L. R. (1985) Zoogeographic evidence for middle and late
Pleistocene land bridges to the Philippine islands. Mod. Quaternary
Res. S.E. Asia 9: 127-143.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, H. C.,
Jr. and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines.
Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Lefranc, N. and Worfolk, T. (1997) Shrikes: a guide to the shrikes of the
world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Mallari, A., Tabaranza, B. and Crosby, M. (2001) Key conservation
sites in the Philippines. Manila: Bookmark.
McGregor, R. C. (1906) Notes on a collection of birds from the Island
of Tablas. Phil. J. Sci. 1: 771-777.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. and Dupont, J. E. (1962) Birds from the
Philippine Islands. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 114: 149-
173.
Parkes, K. C. (1989) Notes on the Menage collection of Philippine
birds 1 . Revision oiP achy ceph ala cinerea (Pachycephalidae) and an
overlooked subspecies of Dicaeum trigonostigma (Dicaeidae).
Nemouria 33: 1-9.
Vaurie, C. (1949) A revision of the bird family Dicruridae. Bull. Amer.
Mas. Nat. Hist. 93: 199-342.
Worcester, D. C. and Bourns, F. S. (1898) Contributions to Philippine
ornithology. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 20: 582-584.
Desmond Allen, 97 Sussex Way, London, N7 6RU, U.K. Email: dnsallen@ukonline.co.uk
APPENDIX
List of birds of Tablas island, Romblon province. Sequence follows Dickinson et al. (1991).
84
DESMOND ALLEN
Forktail 22 (2006)
Key
X = listed in Kennedy et al. (2000) and seen during these surveys
NC = listed in Kennedy et al. (2000) but not observed during these surveys
C = confirmed; not listed in Kennedy et al. (2000), or seen during these surveys, but confirmed from Goodman et al. (1995) or from a museum
specimen
NR = new island record
FORKTAIL 22 (2006): 85-112
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
N. J. COLLAR
Application of a scoring system that grades morphological and vocal differences between allopatric taxa (major character 3, medium 2, minor
1; minimum 7 for species status, with none permitted on minor differences alone) of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae) results in the
recognition of 44 species previously, usually or still occasionally accorded subspecific status: Rufous-crowned Laughingthrush Garrulax
ruficeps, Sumatran Laughingthrush G. bicolor , Bare-headed Laughingthrush G. calvus, Cambodian Laughingthrush G. ferrarius, Rufous¬
cheeked Laughingthrush G. castanotis, Blue-crowned Laughingthrush G. courtoisi, Rufous-vented Laughingthrush G. gularis, Buffy
Laughingthrush G. berthemyi. Orange-breasted Laughingthrush G. annamensis , Taiwan Hwamei G. taewanus, Bhutan Laughingthrush G.
imbricatus, Assam Laughingthrush G. ckrysopterus, Silver-eared Laughingthrush G. melanostigma , Golden-winged Laughingthrush G.
ngoclinhensis, Malayan Laughingthrush G. peninsulae, Black-streaked Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus gravivox, Spot-breasted Scimitar
Babbler P. mcclellandi , Grey-sided Scimitar Babbler P. swinhoei, Sri Lanka Scimitar Babbler P. melanurus, Taiwan Scimitar Babbler P.
musicus, Sumatran Wren Babbler Rimator albostriatus, White-throated Wren Babbler R. pasquieri, Grey-banded Babbler Napothera sorsogonensis,
Taiwan Wren Babbler Pnoepyga formosana, Rusty- throated Wren Babbler Spelaeomis badeigularis, Grey-bellied Wren Babbler S. reptatus ,
Chin Hills Wren Babbler S. oatesi , Pale-throated Wren Babbler S. kinneari, Chevron-breasted Babbler Sphenocichla roberti, Visayan Pygmy
Babbler Stachyris pygmaea, Bold-striped Tit Babbler Macronous bomensis, Mindanao Miniature Babbler Micromacronus sordidus, Vietnamese
Curia Cutia legalleni , Collared Babbler Gampsorhynchus torquatus , Black-crowned Fulvetta Alcippe klossi, Indochinese Fulvetta A. danisi ,
Streak-throated Fulvetta A manipurensis , Taiwan Fulvetta A. formosana, Black-browed Fulvetta A grotei , Black-headed Sibia Heterophasia
desgodinsi, Indochinese Yuhina Yuhina torqueola, Chestnut-crested Yuhina Y. evererti, Burmese Yuhina Y. humilis and Black-headed
Parrotbill Paradoxomis margaritae. Scores for two taxa suggested as possible new species, ‘Afghan Babbler’ Turdoides (caudatus) huttoni and
‘Mount Victoria Babax’ Babax ( lanceolatus ) woodi , fall short, ‘Deignan’s Babbler’ Stachyris rodolphei is provisionally placed in the synonymy
of S’, rufifrons owing to overlap of diagnostic characters, and a new genus, Robsonius, is erected for Napothera rabori and N. sorsogonensis of
the Philippines based on no rictal bristles, part-feathered nares, broad white tips to wing-coverts and outer primaries, copious rump
feathering, insect-like call and walking habit. Taiwan gains seven new endemic species, Vietnam six, China five, Philippines three (and an
endemic genus), Cambodia one, Sri Lanka one, Myanmar one, Sumatra two, the Eastern Himalayas EBA two. Peninsular Malaysia one,
and Thailand minus one. The tiny population of Garrulax courtoisi and massive trade in G. bicolor make these ‘new’ species the highest
priority for conservation action, but several other new splits have small ranges and all require conservation status review.
INTRODUCTION
The family ofbabblers Timaliidae (as adopted by Dickinson
2003), or Timaliinae within the catch-all family
Muscicapidae (as adopted in Deignan 1964), or
Garrulacinae and Timaliini within the family Sylviidae (as
adopted by Inskipp etal. 1996), represents a rather ill-defined
assemblage of species whose affinities to each other and to
other families and species are somewhat unclear. Very
recently, for example, biomolecular analysis has indicated
that the ‘shrike babblers’ Pteruthius and ‘Malagasy babblers’
are not timaliine, but that Sylvia warblers, parrotbills
Paradoxomithidae and white-eyes Zosteropidae are (Cibois
etal. 1999, Cibois 2003a, b). Species limits in the family are
also in a state of flux. In the past six years Robson (2000)
and Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) have made a number
of changes that substantially inflate the list of species provided
by Inskipp et al. (1996), which — molecular insights
notwithstanding — is here taken as the baseline reference
list for the Asian component of the family, with one parrotbill
also considered. Collar (2003) contrasted this component
(plus the parrotbills) with the Neotropical antbirds
(Thamnophilidae and Formicariidae) to suggest that
taxonomic parity of treatment with the latter might result
in an extra 67 species of babbler and parrotbill.
From Inskipp et al. (1996), other than adding three
species described in the intervening period, Robson (2000)
made the following species-level changes, all of them splits,
marked with a sword (f) in the headings below: ( 1 ) Garrulax
ferrarius from G. strepitans; (2) Garrulax castanotis from G.
maesi; (3) Garrulax annamensis from G. merulinus; (4)
Alcippe danisi from A. ruficapilla ; (5) Alcippe grotei from A.
peracensis; and (6) Heterophasia desgodinsi from H.
melanoleuca. Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) did likewise
as follows, marked with a double-sword (rj:) in the headings
below: (7) Garrulax imbricatus from G. lineatus; (8)
Garrulax ckrysopterus from G. erythrocephalus (with two
unspecified splits in South-East Asia); (9) Pomatorhinus
melanurus tentatively from P. horsfieldii ; (10) Rimator
malacoptilus (nominate, monotypic) from other taxa in R.
malacoptilus; (11, 12) Spelaeomis reptatus and 5. oatesi as
a three-way split from S’, chocolatinus ; (13) Sphenocichla
roberti from S. humev, (14) Turdoides huttoni from T.
caudatus', (15) zuood/ tentatively from P. lanceolatus',
(16) Gampsorhynchus torquatus (plus other taxa) from G.
rufulus (monotypic); and (17) Alcippe manipurensis from
A. cinereiceps. None of these splits is justified in more than
a few words, and usually only with the assertion that
evidence for the split exists rather than with the evidence
itself. Consequently many of Robson’s (2000) splits were
not accepted by Dickinson (2003).
Evidence is assembled below to evaluate these and a
number of other splits that appear to be worth making or
supporting, namely: Garrulax ruficeps from G. albogularis,
Garrulax bicolor from G. leucolophus, Garrulax calvus from
G. lugubris, Garrulax courtoisi from G. galbanus, Garrulax
gularis from G. delesserti, Garrulax berthemyi from G.
poecilorhynchus, Garrulax taewanus from G. canorus,
Garrulax melanostigma and G. peninsulae in a three-way
split (following the loss of G. ckrysopterus) from G.
erythrocephalus, Pomatorhinus gravivox, P. mcclellandi and
P. swinhoei in a four-way split from P. erythrocnemis,
Pomatorhinus musicus from P. ruficollis, Napothera
sorsogonensis from N. rabori, Pnoepyga formosana from P.
albiventer, Spelaeomis kinneari as a further split from 5.
(chocolatinus) reptatus, Stachyris pygmaea from 5. plateni,
Macronous bomensis from M. gularis, Micromacronus sordidus
from M. leytensis, Cutia legalleni from C. nipalensis, Alcippe
86
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
klossi from A. castaneceps, Alcippe formosana from A.
cinereiceps, and Yuhina torqueola and Y. everetti in a three-
way split from Y. castaniceps; also included here is the
separation of Paradoxomis margaritae from P. gularis.
Moreover, a small number of lumpings by Dickinson
(2003), beyond those involving splits by Robson (2000)
or indeed Inskipp et al. (1996), are evaluated ( Garrulax
gularis , G. ngoclinhensis, Pomatorhinus erythrocnemis,
Spelaeomis badeigularis, Yuhina everetti and Y. humilis ;
marked with D in the text headings). It perhaps needs
stressing that these splits were ones that drew themselves
to my attention through the evaluation of museum
specimens, but this is not to claim that this review is
exhaustive, and it has not involved any direct evaluation
of vocal differences, although these may exist between
taxa that look too similar to be considered obvious
candidates for species-level treatment.
METHODS
I examined study-skin preparations held (in descending
order of visiting time) at the Natural History Museum,
Tring, UK (BMNH), American Museum of Natural
History, New York (AMNH), National Museum of
Natural History, Washington DC (USNM), Museum
National d’HistoireNaturelle, Paris (MNHN),Naturalis,
Leiden (RMNH), Carnegie Museum of Natural History,
Pittsburgh (CM) and Museum of Natural History, Genoa
(MSNG), taking measurements with digital calipers and
storing and analysing data in electronic spreadsheet files.
For all taxa I attempted to measure a sample of 10-15
individuals, seeking as far as possible a balance between
the sexes, but in several cases such numbers were
unavailable. Although I cite mensural data from other
sources, those that are analysed here (Tables 1-2) come
from my own measurements. For each pair or group of
taxa considered, and for each variable, a one-way ANOVA
was done to test if there is a statistically significant difference
amongst the taxa and, if so, a Scheffe post-hoc comparison
was done to determine where the differences lie; the
significance values in Table 1 are for these comparisons.
In a similar recent exercise (Collar 2004a) I remarked
that, in my view, the guidelines produced by the British
Ornithologists’ Union for discriminating species-level taxa,
particularly in allopatric situations (Helbig et al. 2002),
set thresholds too low by allowing the number (and only
a small number) of diagnostic characters to be used without
taking account of their strength or possible biological
significance . Here instead I deploy a quantitative system —
to be published in detail elsewhere (Collar etal. in prep.)—
for grading morphological and vocal differences between
allopatric taxa: what I judge to be a major character
(involving a pronounced and striking difference in the
colour or pattern of a body part or in a vocalisation) scores
3, a medium character (a clear difference in the foregoing
parameters, e.g. reflected by shade of colour rather than
completely different colour) 2, a minor character (a weak
difference, e.g. reflected as relatively slight change in shade)
1, a threshold of 7 — gauged from a general assessment of
prevailing species-level taxonomies (as in, e.g., Dickinson
2003 and the Handbook of the birds of the world) — is set to
allow species status, and no taxon can qualify for this
status on minor differences alone, no matter how many.
In cases of polytypy the morphologically closest subspecies
are compared (although in statistical tests on mensural
data one taxon is sometimes compared against pooled
taxa).
Simplistic, crude and arbitrary as this method may be,
it introduces an element of explicitness and consistency
into the taxonomic process while setting limits on the
subjectivity necessarily involved in the appraisal of
character ‘strength’; moreover, it establishes a threshold
which evaluations and comparisons elsewhere suggest is
reasonably appropriate to, and consonant with, broadly
accepted decisions in other regions on the taxonomic
status of allopatric forms. Obvious functional dependence
is allowed for, so that where several character differences
appear correlated (for example, different measures of body
size such as tarsus and wing length) they are here scored
once. Very slight shading and very minor mensural
differences are allowed no score. There is no automatic
assumption that statistical significance equates with
biological significance, and all mensural differences, no
matter how highly statistically significant, are scored as
minor characters. To permit assessment of the magnitude
of such differences, percentage differences (always of the
larger taxon relative to the smaller) are also given in the
text; the threshold for according such differences a score
(always only 1) was 5%, but most differences lay in the
region of 10-20%. Vocal differences, when scored at
all, are scored relatively subjectively, with the
acknowledgement that more detailed study using
sonagrams is desirable in due course.
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) pioneered the
reinstatement of many timaliine genera, notably in the
case of the large and evidently polyphyletic Gamdax,
although the neglected work of Wolters (1975-1982)
attempted to set this trend a quarter of a century ago. For
ease of reference, however, generic names are retained
from Inskipp etal. ( 1 996), whose sequence is also followed.
Similarly, for ease of reference all species-name headings
contain in brackets the name of the taxon from which the
split is being made (but where the split is here not accepted,
the brackets have been left out). In a few cases where the
situation is particularly complex, I have listed out the new
arrangement in full, in the style of Dickinson (2003).
SPECIES-LIMITS EVALUATIONS
Garrulax (albogularis) ruficeps
Collar (2004b) outlined the plumage differences between
ruficeps and albogularis (and its two similar races), having
earlier indicated the candidacy of the split with
photographs (Collar 2003). The entire crown of ruficeps
is dull rufous (3) whereas on albogularis only the lower
forehead is stained this colour; the breast-band in ruficeps
is greatly reduced in width (1) and the lower underparts
are whitish with grey-buff flanks rather than golden-buff
throughout (2). There are slight mensural differences
between races eons (Yunnan) and nominate albogularis
(Bhutan to northern Vietnam; westernmost whistleri not
measured) : ruficeps possesses a slightly longer bill, shorter
wing and shorter tail (3-1 1% differences) (1; Tables 1-
2) but substantially and highly statistically significantly
larger white two outermost tail-tips (length of tip was
measured as the length of the shaft which was white; all
pair-wise comparisons for each rectrix, P< 0.001; ruficeps
respectively 19% and 16% longer than albogularis, and
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
87
Plate 1. Head of mounted Garrulax bicolor (MSNG 26547).
Photo: N. J. Collar.
27% and 23% longer than eous) (1). A score of 8 confirms
that species status for ruficeps is appropriate here, and for
it I suggest the name Rufous-crowned Laughingthrush.
Garrulax (leucolophus) bicolor
White-crested Laughingthrush G. leucolophus consists of
five subspecies: nominate leucolophus in most of India and
into Tibet, patkaicus adjacent in north-east India and
Yunnan, belangeri in Myanmar and south-west Thailand,
diardi from Thailand to Indochina, and bicolor in Sumatra.
Of these patkaicus differs little from leucolophus but has a
usually more extensive and richly coloured chestnut mantle
(based on BMNH skins); belangeri has more extensive
rufous-chestnut upperparts than patkaicus , the black of
the lores meeting just above the bill on the lower forehead,
the white of the throat and upper breast extending onto
the belly and merging with the rufous-chestnut of the
flanks and lower belly (rather than being sharply delineated
below the upper breast), with the remaining underparts
chestnut rather than dark brown; and diardi is like
belangeri but slightly stronger rufous-chestnut above,
while below the white is still more extensive, reaching
the lower belly, with dull rufous-brown on flanks, thighs
and vent.
However, bicolor reverts to leucolophus in pattern,
having the white sharply delineated on the lower breast,
but lacks any rufous-chestnut, grey, or mouse-brown that
are present in various combinations in the other subspecies,
having instead a blackish body, wings and tail (3), although
juveniles have the mid-belly to vent with much white
admixed (RMNH Cat. 15). It has a very different facial
pattern owing to the black round the base of the bill pushing
up as a triangle onto the forehead (1), the white on the
side of the forehead moving down in front of the eye (1),
and the black of the ear-coverts being reduced to a thick
line (1), leaving a black goggle-like rim round the eye
quite different from the bold masked pattern on all other
leucolophus (Plate 1). It is also a statistically significantly
shorter-tailed bird (1) than any of the other races (13%
shorter tail than the other races combined; Tables 1-2).
A score of 7 does not, perhaps, do full justice to the
distinctiveness of this species, for which I suggest the
name Sumatran Laughingthrush.
There is also, incidentally, weak evidence of a habitat
shift between bicolor and continental taxa, the former being
judged ‘montane’, ranging from 750 to 2,000 m (RMNH
Cat. 13 is from 720 m), albeit with a reputed lowland
population requiring substantiation (van Marie and Voous
1988), the latter extending from sea-level to 1,600 m,
rarely to 2,135 m (Robson 2000). However, this may
simply reflect a trend in continental avian taxa to become
more montane in the Sundaic region (P. D. Round in litt.
2006), and certainly should be allowed no relevance as a
taxonomic gauge.
Garrulax (lugubris) calvus
Inskipp et al. (1996) pointed out that both Sibley and
Monroe (1990) and Andrew (1992) had without
explanation treated Bornean calvus (Bare-headed
Laughingthrush) as a species separate from lugubris (Black
Laughingthrush), but they drew attention to Chasen’s
(1935) detection of ‘incipient baldness’ in lugubris and
Harrap’s (1992) discovery of identical vocalisations
eliciting immediate responses from each population when
played recordings of the other. Robson (2000) nevertheless
considered lugubris monotypic, extending only to Sumatra,
thereby indicating his support for the splitting off of calvus.
Dickinson (2003), in retaining the two taxa as one species,
made no reference to Robson’s decision.
The auditory evidence certainly suggests that these
two taxa have diverged little, but in an aside on their vocal
similarity Eames et al. (1999) argued that ‘there would
have been no evolutionary advantage for the two taxa to
evolve distinctive songs since they are spatially separated’.
However one regards the vocal issue, the baldness of calvus
with its resultant brownish-yellowish cranial coloration
(as against rich black feathering with a blue bare postocular
patch in lugubris ) is, unquestionably, a major character
whose magnitude might best be reflected by allowing for
the baldness (3) and difference in colour (2) separately;
the body plumage is brownish-grey rather than blackish-
grey ( 1 ), and the bill and tail are highly significantly shorter
and wing significantly so (1) (respectively 6%, 8% and 3%
shorter; see Tables 1-2). This score only just makes the
grade, and is dependent on a very subjective assessment
of the characters of the head. It is possible, however, that
the bill of calvus is more red rather than orange, and that
the bare orbital and postocular skin is bluish-green or
bluish-brown rather than bluish to violet; these would add
two further points.
Garrulax (strepitans) ferrarius f
Under White-necked Laughingthrush G. strepitans Inskipp
et al. (1996) carried a brief history of the treatment of this
taxon, concluding with the following statement: ‘The form
ferrarius shows a number of plumage characters that are
not intermediate between strepitans and milleti [with both
of which it was at various times lumped] and the tail is
slightly shorter than that of milleti , but much shorter than
thatofsm?p/M;« (C. R. Robsonpers. comm. 1995)’. Later,
in treating ferrarius as a full species (Cambodian
Laughingthrush), Robson (2000) himself stated that it
‘shows strong morphological differences consistent with
other closely related species in the White-necked/Black-
hooded/Grey Laughingthrush grouping’ . Neither this nor
the argument in Round and Robson (2001) satisfed
Dickinson (2003), who noted that the evidence for this
split, as given in Robson (2000), is ‘limited’, and kept
ferrarius within strepitans. Thus initially it is with strepitans
that ferrarius must be compared.
BMNH possesses a single specimen of ferrarius
(photographed live and discussed in Eames et al. 2002)
88
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
T able 1 . Means, ranges and standard error of measurements (in mm) of various taxa reviewed in this paper. Bill was measured from skull, wing curved.
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
89
90
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
91
measurements suggest that ferrarius is only marginally
smaller than strepitans, so the tail difference is worth a
score of at least 1 . On this basis/errarz'zzs achieves specific
status from strepitans.
However, Riley (1930b, 1938) thought/<?rrarz3z.scloser
to Black-hooded Laughingthrush G. milleti than to G.
strepitans, as does C. R. Robson (in litt. 2006). That this
view is correct is demonstrated by the way the scoring
system used here only just allows ferrarius specific status
from milleti : 3 for major loss of white continuous ‘collar’
and whitish mid-belly, 1 for crown colour, 1 for breast
colour, 1 for stronger olive flanks, 1 for the marginally
shorter tail, total 7. Facial skin colour is the same (C. R.
Robson in litt. 2006).
Garnilax (maesi) castanotis f
Under Grey Laughingthrush G. zzzuesz Inskipp et al . (1996)
cited a personal communication from C. R. Robson that
castanotis ‘may be a separate species because it is very
distinct morphologically and occurs within 50 km of G.
m. maesi'm eastTonkin (J. Eames pers. comm.)’. As with
ferrarius, Robson (2000), in separating the form (along
with race varennei ) as a species (Rufous-cheeked
Laughingthrush), simply remarked that it ‘shows strong
morphological differences consistent with other closely
related species in the White-necked/Black-hooded/Grey
Laughingthrush grouping’. Dickinson (2003) made no
comment on this when retaining castanotis within maesi.
While castanotis and maesi are spectacularly different
from each other, varennei forms something of a bridge
between them, sharing the former’s rufous cheek-patch
and the latter’s white areas, hence encouraging the notion
that all three taxa belong within maesi. Nevertheless,
varennei aligns much more clearly with castanotis than
with maesi. Where maesi shows somewhat smudgily
edged greyish-white ear-coverts and adjoining white post¬
ocular lateral crown-stripe, post-auricular patch and
neck-sides, this white is reduced in varennei and absent
in castanotis, both of which exhibit a clear-cut bold circular
rufous patch of elongate feathers (larger in castanotis )
extending over the ear-coverts and lower moustachial area
but not onto the lateral crown area or the neck-sides (score
3 for colour difference, 1 for elongation of feathers); the
forecrown of maesi is markedly paler grey than in castanotis
or varennei (1). Where maesi has a buffy greyish-brown
throat and upper breast with palish grey remaining
underparts, castanotis and varennei have a dark grey-brown
throat and breast (2) with somewhat darker grey remaining
underparts (no score) . Mensurally, maesi is a slightly larger
bird than castanotis, with a decidedly longer tail, but again
varennei sits between them as a link (Tables 1-2).
Nevertheless, the facial and frontal features of castanotis
and varennei are sufficiently distinct from maesi to justify
their separation as a polytypic species.
Garrulax (galbanus) courtoisi
Long et al. (1994) suggested that Yellow-throated
Laughingthrush G. galbanus (monotypic) might better be
separated from what had until then been regarded as its
two subspecies, G. courtoisi and G. simaoensis, a course
favoured by Pasini et al. (1994). Inskipp et al. (1996)
elected to follow Long et al. (1994) in keeping the three
taxa united as one species ‘pending further study’. Such
further study has been inhibited by the paucity and
diaspora of specimen material, and by the difficulty of
finding any simaoensis in the wild and of getting into habitat
where nominate galbanus occurs.
R. Wilkinson (in litt. 2006) has measured specimens of
courtoisi and the type of simaoensis as well as galbanus, and
has found that, on wing length, all three courtoisi skins and
two out of three simaoensis measure longer than a series of
44 galbanus. He strongly suspects that simaoensis is a
synonym of courtoisi, since the latter is moderately variable
in the minor character (breast-band coloration) that is
used to separate it; but even if the taxon stands it is clearly
no more than a subspecies of courtoisi. BMNH holds 45
nominate galbanus including the type, no courtoisi and a
single captive specimen, juvenile and tailless, of what is
believed to be simaoensis. This material, supplemented by
photographs of living and museum-preserved courtoisi
supplied by R. Wilkinson, L. Gardner and M. Kilbum,
have allowed a reasonable comparison between courtoisi
and galbanus, from which it is obvious that they are
extremely closely related. However, the long-noted
differences in courtoisi, the rich blue crown and nape (3)
and blue-shaded primaries (2), are not its only characters.
It also possesses a markedly broader and longer black
supercilium, giving a broader general mask (which runs
over and into the black ear-coverts) (1), a more olive-
tinged mantle, back and inner primaries (1), a greyer-blue
proximal portion of the tail (no score, since perhaps better
treated as one with the blue-shaded primaries) and more
extensive white tail-tipping (1). The minor but distinct
yellowish-grey breast-band is probably variable, and not a
character to separate from the more olive-tinged mantle;
even so, a score of 8 confirms that courtoisi is sufficiently
distinctive to be treated as a separate species, for which I
suggest the name Blue-crowned Laughingthrush.
A much more detailed analysis of this taxon, including
a review of morphometries, is in preparation by R.
Wilkinson and co-workers.
Garrulax (delesserti) gularis D
Breaking with precedent, Sibley and Monroe (1990)
treated Rufous-vented Laughingthrush G. gularis as a
separate species from Wynaad Laughingthrush G.
delesserti, and in this they were followed by Inskipp et al.
( 1 996), who pointed out that ‘it is very distinct in a number
of plumage characters’, and by Grimmett et al. (1998).
However, Dickinson (2003) remarked that ‘this split is
probably valid, but it has not been sufficiently defended
since the two were lumped’. This curious circumstance
persists: Grimmett et al. (1998) devoted their text to
indicating how gularis differs from G. galbanus, not G.
delesserti, while Rasmussen and Anderton (2005), although
treating the two as separate, offered no argument to allay
Dickinson’s concern.
In plumage and bare-part coloration, gularis differs
from delesserti in the following characters: all-dark bill
(delesserti has a pale lower mandible, at least) (2); paler
grey crown and nape, and paler brown upperparts and
wings (1); paler tail (less contrasting than in delesserti,
where the tail is darker than the back) ( 1 ); rufous outertail
feathers (uniform in delesserti) (3); darker (blackish) and
hence more contrasting mask ( 1 ) ; distinct black interramal
region (or ‘chin’) and black patch at the base of the lower
mandible (both sparsely feathered and either straw-
coloured or buffy-brown in delesserti) ( 1 ); yellow not white
chin, throat and central breast and upper belly (2); and
rustier, less chestnut lower flanks and belly (1). These
92
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
differences, three of them (bill, outertail and breast)
distinctive, are easily enough to warrant treatment of gularis
as a separate species. Moreover, the compilation of vocal
data in Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) — who indicate
no mensural differences of import (although Tables 1-2
reveal a marginally shorter bill, longer wing and longer
tail in delesserti : score 1) — suggests that at least one song
type of delesserti has no clear equivalent in gularis.
Garrulax (poecilorhynchus) berthemyi
Collar (2004b) outlined the plumage differences between
G. p. poecilorhynchus and G. p. berthemyi but a correction
is required (the bare orbital area in life is blue, not black
as in museum skins) and further clarification is in order.
Their colour pattern is essentially the same, but the shading
is notably different, with berthemyi distinctly paler (pale
silvery-grey vs dark smoky-grey on the lower breast to
abdomen; creamy buff-brown vs rufous-tinged darkish
brown on throat and upper breast; pale olive-rufous vs
darkish rufous-brown from crown to rump) (score 3).
Moreover, berthemyi has richer rufous-chestnut wings and
tail, so that the contrast with the paler body plumage is
much stronger than in the more continuously dark rufous
of poecilorhynchus (1); it has obviously larger white tail-tips
than the latter (commonly twice the width of the latter and
present on three rather than two or one outermost feathers)
(1); it has black lores, lower forehead and chin vs rufous-
chestnut in poecilorhynchus (2); and its auriculars are white-
tipped ( 1 ) . While tarsus and tail are of equal lengths in the
two taxa, in berthemyi the bill is very significantly shorter
(9%; 1) and the wing very significantly longer (1 1%; 1)
(see Tables 1-2). There is apparently no difference in
shade of orbital skin, based on photographs (C . R. Robson
in litt. 2006), while it is unknown whether one exists in
voice; but a score of 8-10 makes these two allospecies. I
suggest that G. poecilorhynchus retain the English name
Rusty Laughingthrush, and G. berthemyi take Buffy
Laughingthrush .
Incidentally, examination of the type and a second
specimen (USNM 314188 and 314189) of the Yunnan
race ricinus leads me to think that berthemyi might better be
considered monotypic. Riley (1930a) established ricinus for
being ‘lighter brown above and on the foreneck and jugulum’
and ‘breast and belly a much lighter gray’ than berthemyi.
However, setting his two specimens against the only one in
USNM (273765) of berthemyi , from Fujian, I see no
difference at all between them; nor do the measurements in
Riley ( 1 930a), which suggest a rather larger bird in Yunnan
with a rather shorter bill, come out distinct against the
sample in Tables 1-2. The series of eight ricinus in BMNH
all fail to show paler bellies than specimens of berthemyi, and
while five of them are slightly stonier (less rufous-tinged)
above, the other three are consistent with berthemyi ; thus
ricinus seems a fairly tenuous taxon. On the other hand, it
is gratifying to note that Riley (1930a) concluded his
description of ricinus with a defence of the separateness of
berthemyi and poecilorhynchus ; ‘They have both been derived
from the same stock, but now are so distinct that it is
misleading to treat them as forms of the same species.’
Garrulax (merulinus) annamensis^
Under Spot-breasted Laughingthrush G. merulinus
Inskipp etal. (1996) carried the following statement: ‘C.
R. Robson (pers. comm. 1995) prefers to treat G. m.
annamensis of southern Vietnam as a separate species from
merulinus because of striking morphological differences’.
Robson (2000) himself split annamensis (Orange-breasted
Laughingthrush), simply citing ‘very significant
morphological differences’. Dickinson (2003) conceded
that annamensis ‘may be a separate species as suggested
by Robson (2000)’ but called for a ‘full review’.
Garrulax merulinus occurs in three subspecies in
mountain forest from north-east India, northern Myanmar
and western Yunnan, China (nominate merulinus), north¬
west 4'hailand ( [laoensis ) and south-east Yunnan to
northern Laos and northern Vietnam ( obscurus ). These
taxa are lightly differentiated, based largely on the shading
of the upper- and underparts, and size and shape of breast
markings. The situation changes completely with the
appearance of annamensis in South Annam. Where
merulinus (including laoensis and obscurus ) has a buffy-
white postocular supercilium, basal breast colour and mid¬
belly to vent, annamensis is a rich rufous-tan (score 2).
Where merulinus possesses a buffy-white chin and throat
with brown spotting (consistent with the breast), and
greyish-brown lores and forecrown distinct from the richer
brown crown, annamensis has a black chin and throat
extending onto the moustachial area, lores and periorbital
region (3), with the rufous-tan supercilium extending
forward over the lores ( 1 ) . Where merulinus has bold thrush-
like brown spotting on the throat and breast, annamensis
has much finer and black streaks (2). On the upperparts
annamensis is a shade more olive and the tail a shade darker
than in merulinus and, below, the latter’s brown flanks are
a shade redder and darker (possibly 1). From collectors’
descriptions of bare part colours it would seem likely that
the legs are darker brown in annamensis (possibly 1). In
annamensis it may be possible to tell the sexes apart, as the
black of the chin and throat appears to be shaded brown
and less defined in the moustachial region in the female
(possibly 1); telling the sexes of merulinus is less obvious,
but females may be paler buff on the chin. Mensurally
annamensis is slightly shorter-billed and -winged than
nominate merulinus (no score; Tables 1-2), but a score of
at least 8 establishes the latter as a monotypic species.
Garrulax (canorus) taewanus
Collar (2004b) outlined the plumage differences between
the taxa taewanus and canorus, having earlier indicated
the candidacy of the split with photographs (Collar 2003) .
Race taewanus lacks the white brow and broad eye-ring
(3), the base colour below and on forehead is pale buff
rather than pale rufous (2), and the base colour to the
crown and nape is a buffy stone-grey rather than a pale
buffy-brown (1); moreover, several website photographs
confirm the report by F. Crystal (in litt. 2006) that taewanus
has ‘yellowish skin round the eye’, whereas photographs
of canorus show distinctly (bluish-)greyish skin in this
area, offset by the broader white eye-ring ( 1 ) . Mensurally
the two are very close, but with canorus having a slightly
shorter tail (no score; Tables 1-2). Tu Hsiao-wei (2003)
reported that the song of taewanus resembles that of canorus
but is less complex and more repetitive (1). It is known
that the two taxa react to each other’s songs, and there is
worrying interbreeding of the Taiwan birds with escaped
canorus that have been imported for singing competitions
(L. L. Severinghaus verbally 2003) . Nevertheless, a score
of 8 permits the separation of taeivanus at the species
level, and I suggest the names Taiwan Hwamei and
Chinese Hwamei for the two resultant species.
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
93
Garrulax (lineatus) imbricatus %
Calling this the Bhutan Laughingthrush Trochalopteron
imbrication , Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) commented:
‘Considered a distinct species here, as imbricatum is
morphologically very distinct from [Streaked
Laughingthrush] G. lineatum , evidently not intergrading
despite close geographic approach. Most of its
vocalisations differ considerably, and tape playbackyielded
no response (PIH [P. I. Holt]); further study needed.’
The form imbricatus of Bhutan differs from the five
subspecies of lineatus as they line up from west to east
(. schachdarensis in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bilkevitchi in
Afghanistan, gilgit mostly in Pakistan, nominate lineatus in
the western Himalayas and setafer in the central Himalayas)
by its unstreaked rich brown crown (score 2), lack of rusty
ear-coverts (2), more extensive white shaft-streaks from
moustachial region and ear-coverts onto sides of neck (1),
richer brown upperparts and tail and absence of background
grey in the plumage above or below, making for a richer,
darker lower belly (2), considerably longer tail ( 1 ) and greatly
reduced pale tail-tips (1). Tail measurements in this case
are gauged from Rasmussen and Anderton (2005), who
give a range of 105-1 12 for imbricatus as against 90-95 for
gilgit and 95-99 for setafer. It is entirely reasonable, with a
score of 9, to regard imbricatus as specifically distinct from
lineatus, irrespective of vocal differences.
Garrulax (erythrocephalus) chrysopterus^
Garrulax (erythrocephalus) melanostigma
Garrulax (erythrocephalus) ngoclinhensis D
Garrulax (erythrocephalus) peninsulae
Dickinson (2003) retained Chestnut-crowned
Laughingthrush G. erythrocephalus as highly polytypic and,
without explanation, added to it the recently described
Golden-winged Laughingthrush G. ngoclinhensis, despite
the very strong case for species status made in the latter’s
original description (Eames et al. 1999), which also,
incidentally, provides a valuable key for the characters of
all subspecies of G. erythrocephalus sensu lato. Meanwhile,
in splitting chrysopterus from G. erythrocephalus under the
name Assam Laughingthrush T rochalopteron chrysopterum,
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) simply remarked:
‘Striking morphological and consistent vocal differences
from other racial groups argue for specific status, as is also
the case for two extralimital SE Asian racial groups. ’ They
divided their restricted G. erythrocephalus into a western
group, with the nominate form in the western Himalayas
and subspecies kali in west and central Nepal, and an
eastern group, including the subspecies nigrimentum (east
Nepal to western Arunachal Pradesh) and the often
disregarded imprudens (eastern Arunachal Pradesh). In
their newly established G. chrysopterus, whose nominate
form occupies Meghalaya, they included at least the
subspecies godwini (north Cachar to western Manipur)
and etythrolaemus (eastern Manipur and Lushai Hills).
The difference between the western and eastern groups
of the restricted G. erythrocephalus is very marked (in some
respects more so than the difference between G.
erythrocephalus and G. chrysopterus) . The eastern group
loses the chestnut crown that gives the species sensu lato its
name, retaining chestnut only on the nape, and having the
crown dark grey with broad black streaks; below, and on
the back and scapulars, it is a much richer chestnut colour.
Nevertheless, as Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) pointed
out, there is a broad zone of intergradation in central Nepal,
so that their separation at the species level would appear
to be inappropriate (although further study of the breadth
of this zone might indicate a different treatment).
Garrulax chrysopterus, with the three subspecies
mentioned by Rasmussen and Anderton (2005), differs
from the restricted G. erythrocephalus by: more extensive,
browner-centred spotting on the upperparts (score 1) and
less extensive spotting on the underparts ( 1 ), with no black
throat (2) , different-structured (elongate, with paler centres,
vs rounded with paler fringes) pinkish-chestnut ear-coverts
(2) . The pale grey supercilium present in races chrysopterus
and godwini is absent in erythrolaemus, this last thus
possessing a head very like nominate erythrocephalus. If
Rasmussen and Anderton’s (2005) assertion of ‘consistent
vocal differences’ is allowed a score of 3 (although their
transcriptions of songs do not look particularly different),
then a score of 9 strongly upholds the split.
However, where does the race woodi, not considered
by Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) because extralimital
to their region, fit in this split? It occurs in north and
north-eastern Myanmar and western Yunnan, and is
therefore an eastern outlier of both species-level taxa in
the proposed rearrangement. While it possesses the basic
throat pattern (absence of black) and the ear-covert
structure and pattern of chrystopterus, it shares the crown
pattern, back pattern and breast pattern of nigrimentum.
Its throat and upper breast pattern is dissimilar from the
rest of chrysopterus in being duller, darker and more
streaked, thus tonally closer to the upper breast of
nigrimentum. I therefore place it next to nigrimentum as a
member of the newly restricted G. erythrocephalus. In
distinguishing chrysopterus from G. erythrocephalus thus
constituted, the characters can be enumerated again as
the more extensive spotting above (1) and less extensive
spotting below (1), and the rather bright rufous throat
with black streaking (2). It is a leap of faith to assume that
the vocal characters of woodi align with those of
erythrocephalus — the score of 3 takes us to the needed 7—
and I make it here with circumspection.
Once the taxa in the chrysopterus group are allowed
species status, it becomes considerably less easy to
maintain the taxa further east and south within the reduced
erythrocephalus. Examination of material at BMNH, which
holds all subspecies except subconnectens and schistaceus
(these exhibit relatively minor differences from
melanostigma and connectens,fide Deignan 1 938), certainly
allows a further breakdown of the erythrocephalus complex.
To begin with, all remaining subspecies possess no
maculations on the upperparts of the body, only light (if
any) scaling on the breast, and black (dark grey in
connectens ) primary coverts. Subspecies connectens (north¬
east and central Laos, south-east Yunnan and north-west
Vietnam), subconnectens (northern Thailand), schistaceus
(eastern Myanmar and northernmost Thailand),
melanostigma (eastern and south-eastern Myanmar,
southern north-west Thailand) and ramsayi (southern
south-east Myanmar; for clearer ranges of all taxa see
Robson [2000]) group together (under the oldest name,
melanostigma ) in being dull olive-green above (except on
the crown) and shading below from rufous throat to greyish
belly. The taxa ngoclinhensis and peninsulae represent two
highly distinct offshoots, the former with grey and the
latter with dull rusty-brown body plumage.
Set against either G. erythrocephalus or G. chrysopterus,
birds of the melanostigma group show no dorsal maculation
94
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
(3), dark primary coverts (black in all except connectens,
in which they are dark grey) (2), more extensive silvery-
edged ear-coverts (1), broad, dark-streaked grey
supercilium spreading onto upper neck-sides (1), black
chin and malar area ( 1 ), and olive-tinged lower underparts
(1). The subspecies connectens is well named, since it
exhibits the breast scaling and paler primary coverts that
suggest a link to Himalayan taxa, but even so it sits well
enough within the melanostigrna group, which clearly
emerges as specifically distinct in this analysis and scoring.
The form ngoclinhensis differs from G. melanostigrna in
having a dark grey body (3), rusty-golden outerwebs to the
remiges and fringes to the rectrices (2), dark-streaked
brownish-grey forehead ( 1 ) and virtually zero chestnut tones
on chin and throat (1-2). The score of 3 scarcely does
justice to the distinctiveness of the body coloration; but in
any case the total score of 7-8 confers specific rank on this
taxon. Additional scores would accrue from comparison
with the maculated G. erythrocephalus and G. chrysopterus .
The form peninsulae differs from G. melanostigrna and
G. ngoclinhensis in having throat to belly plain chestnut-
brown (richest on throat, becoming browner on lower
flanks, thighs and vent) (3), mantle and scapulars to
uppertail-coverts plain dull chestnut-brown (1), crown
maroon-chestnut (1), reduced black on lores and chin
(1), reduced silvery delineation of ear-coverts (1), dark
silvery-grey hind-collar ( 1 ) and white eye-ring ( 1 ) . Again,
additional scores would accrue from comparison with the
maculated G. erythrocephalus and G. chrysopterus, but in
any case the taxon emerges as a full species.
The new arrangement thus lines up — with several
tentatively proposed new English names and very crude
ranges — as follows:
Chestnut-crowned Laughingthrush Gamtlax
erythrocephalus
G. e. erythrocephalus (Vigors, 1 832) -NW Himalayas.
G. e. kali Vaurie, 1953 - C Himalayas (W and C
Nepal).
G. e. nigrimentum (Oates, 1889) - E Himalayas (E
Nepal to N and E Assam).
G. e. woodi (E. C. S. Baker, 1914) - N and NE
Myanmar, W Yunnan.
Assam Laughingthrush Garrulax chrysopterus
G. c. chrysopterus (Gould, 1835) - SW Assam.
G. c. godwini (Harington, 1914) -N Cachar Hills
(SE Assam).
G. c. erythrolaemus (Hume, 1 88 1) - E Manipur, W
and SW Myanmar.
Silver-eared Laughingthrush Garrulax
melanostigrna
G. m. connectens (Delacour, 1929) - NE and C
Laos, SE Yunnan, NW Vietnam.
G. m. subconnectens Deignan, 1 938 - Doi Phu Kha
(N Thailand).
G. m. schistaceus Deignan, 1938 - E Myanmar, N
Thailand.
G. m. melanostigrna Blyth, 1855 - E and SE
Myanmar, NW Thailand.
G. m. ramsayi (Ogilvie-Grant, 1904) - southern
SE Myanmar.
Golden-winged Laughingthrush Garrulax
ngoclinhensis Eames, Trai and Cu, 1999 - C
Vietnam.
Malayan Laughingthrush Garrulax peninsulae
(Sharpe, 1887) - Malay Peninsula.
Pomatorhinus (erythrocnemis) gravivox [asP. (e.)
erythrocnemis sensu lato ] D
Pomatorhinus (erythrocnemis) mcclellandi
Pomatorhinus (erythrocnemis) svoinhoei
The Pomatorhinus erythrogenys complex has divided
authorities into two camps: those who would maintain it
as a single species (Deignan 1952, 1964, Ali and Ripley
1971, Cheng 1987, Dickinson 2003) and those who would
split it into its plain-breasted and spot-breasted components
as ‘Rusty-cheeked Scimitar Babbler’ P. erythrogenys and
‘Spot-breasted Scimitar Babbler’ Pomatorhinus
erythrocnemis (Stanford and Ticehurst 1935, Vaurie 1954,
1959, Sibley and Monroe 1990, Inskipp et al. 1996,
Grimmett et al. 1998, Robson 2000, Rasmussen and
Anderton 2005). Although the split of erythrocnemis from
P. erythrogenys is accepted here because I follow Inskipp et
al. (1996), it is necessary to go over the ground again to
confirm the situation and give context to any further break¬
up of erythrocnemis.
The erythrogenys-erythrocnemis split was apparently first
proposed by C. B. Ticehurst partly because the taxa odicus
and imberbis (a) ‘bear little resemblance’ to each other, (b)
approach each other as closely as ‘Bhamo and Bemardmyo’
(the latter evidently near Mogok) in Myanmar, with ‘no
intergrades being known’, and (c) occur sympatrically at
two other localities fide Lord Rothschild (Stanford and
Ticehurst 1935). However, Deignan (1952) demonstrated
that no such sympatry has been found; this is presumably
the source for Dickinson’s (2003) footnote, made against
the race celatus (=‘ imberbis ’ in this part of Myanmar), that
‘there is insufficient evidence of sympatry between celatus
and odicus to require treatment as two species’. Deignan
(1952) also argued that the distance from Bhamo south to
Mogok (only about 1 60 km) marks a known zoogeographic
gap (indeed: see under Heterophasia desgodinsi), rendering
the idea of sympatry even less tenable. Moreover, the
revelation that birds in north-west Thailand ( celatus ) can
occasionally show spotted breasts (P. D. Round in litt.
2006) further complicates the situation. These things,
however, do not alter the facts that, in general, the taxa are
very distinctive and approach each other very closely in
this region, and Vaurie (1954) pointed out that further
south in Myanmar the two remain relatively close ( imberbis /
celatus at Kalaw and Taung-gyi and in adjacent northern
Thailand, odicus in Kengtung state some 250 km to the
east), remarking: ‘the sharp difference in pattern between
the two and the fact that intergrading populations are
unknown suggests that it is more constructive to regard
them as separate species’.
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) noted that (a)
ferrugilatus [= harington i } and mcclellandi ‘approach each
other closely in range, without evidence of intergradation’,
but that (b) female-type song-notes of birds in northern
Thailand are longer than in the Himalayas and thus ‘do
not support conspecificity of all unspotted forms to the
exclusion of all spot-breasted forms’. They judged that
‘several species are probably involved, with... mcclellandi
perhaps one’. The extent to which vocal differences in
this complex of taxa will shed light on their relationships
is unknown, and comparison within unspotted forms is
not here attempted, but certainly their rearrangement
into a number of species, using morphological evidence
only, is worth pursuing.
Separation of mcclellandi as a monotypic species resides
in its unregimented, loose huffy olive-grey (appearing drab
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
95
brown) spotting on the breast (vs regimented black streaks,
plain breast or, in many ferrugilatus, dense blurry greyish-
streaked throat to breast) (3), and warm buffy olive-grey
(vs orange-tawny) flanks (2); from plain-breasted taxa it
further differs in its much stronger malar stripe (2), and
from spot-breasted forms (discounting erythrocnemis ) by
its much paler and reduced rusty ear-coverts and lores (2) .
It also separates from other species as recognised below on
its shorter tarsus and wing (no score; Tables 1-2). A score
of 7 just lifts mcclellandi into species status. It appears not
to intergrade with other taxa.
The acquisition of heavy regular black drop-like
streaking on the breast of birds is a major character
separating predominantly eastern forms from plain¬
breasted forms and even from the spot-breasted mcclellandi
(3). Except for the eastern races abbreviatus, swinhoei and
erythrocnemis — to be considered separately — the spot¬
breasted races differ further from the plain-breasted forms
in possessing a strong malar stripe topped by a pale
(sometimes flecked) submoustachial area (3) and less
extensive and intense orange-tawny flank coloration (1).
A score of 7 again just lifts the various taxa, whose oldest
name is gravivox, into species status.
In the forms abbreviatus and swinhoei, major differences
from adjacent Chinese taxa occur: the submoustachial
stripe disappears (2) , the scapulars and back become foxy-
rufous, as does the vent (2), but the underparts below the
breast are suffused grey, including the outer flanks (2)
and the breast-streaking is trimmed more clearly at mid¬
breast, not extending onto the upper belly ( 1 ) . For a third
time a score of 7 just reaches species status. Deignan
(1952) noted that in the past these two taxa and the T aiwan
bird had ‘commonly been considered a species distinct
from other ferruginous-cheeked scimitar-babblers’, but
he judged that his new race cowensae ‘shows a first step
toward intergradation between gravivox and szvinhoef by
virtue of the ‘general reddening of the plumage and the
strengthening of the dark centers of the coronal feathers’.
However, these do not influence the scored differences
above; nor does Deignan’s (1952) discovery of a
northernmost specimen of swinhoei with rufous-washed
flanks, which he felt predicted an undocumented
intermediate population.
Finally, while the T aiwanese form erythrocnemis groups
with swinhoei and abbreviatus in terms of its rustier tones
above, underparts without orange-ochre, and more
organised, clear-cut breast-spotting, it is nevertheless
markedly different: the bill is all dark (1), crown darker
grey (1), neck-sides greyish (notrusty-olive) (1), chin and
throat clearer white (without dark shaft-streaks) but breast¬
streaking broader and denser (2), submoustachial area
black (2), rear ear-coverts (indeed all ear-coverts except
the subocular area) grey (not rusty) (1), flanks stained
dark olive (less pure grey) with belly whiter (1), mantle
and scapulars, and vent, darker chestnut, including lower
tarsal feathering (1). A specimen in USNM (472175)
showing a rather weakly developed dark submoustachial
area is presumably immature; all other specimens I have
examined show the stripe strongly.
The new arrangement, which clearly rests on uncertain
foundations and is in need of considerable fortification
(which is not supplied by morphometric analysis, as this
shows as much variation within the new species as between
them, notably a remarkably long tail in dedekensi: see T ables
1-2), thus emerges — with several tentatively proposed
new English names — as follows (Rusty-cheeked included
here to clarify which subspecies belong to it):
Rusty-cheeked Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
erythrogenys
P. e. erythrogenys Vigors, 1832 - NW Himalayas
P. e. ferrugilatus Hodgson, 1836 - C Himalayas
(Nepal to Bhutan)
P. e. imberbis Salvadori, 1889 - Karenm (E
Myanmar)
P. e. celatus Deignan, 1941 - Shan States (E
Myanmar), NW Thailand
Spot-breasted Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
mcclellandi Godwin-Austen, 1870 - S Assam,
W Myanmar
Blacic-streaked Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
gravivox
P. g. odicus Bangs and Phillips, 1914 - NE and E
Myanmar, N Indochina, S Yunnan, Guizhou
(except N)
P. g. decarlei Deignan, 1952 - E Xizang, SW
Sichuan, NW Yunnan
P. g. dedekensi Oustalet, 1892 - (N)E Xizang, W
Sichuan, NW Yunnan
P. g. gravivox David, 1873 - S Gansu, S Shaanxi,
S Shanxi, NW Henan, N Sichuan
P. g. cowensae Deignan, 1952 - C and E Sichuan,
N Guizhou, W Hubei
Grey-sided Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
swinhoei
P. s. swinhoei David, 1874 - E Jiangxi, S Anhui,
NW and C Fujian
P. s. abbreviatus Stresemann, 1929 - Guangxi, S
Hunan, N Guangdong
Black-necklaced Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
erythrocnemis Gould, 1863 - Taiwan
Pomatorhinus (horsfieldii) melanurus%
This is a split within a split. White-browed Scimitar Babbler
P. schisticeps of the Himalayas has been regarded as
embracing ‘Indian Scimitar Babbler’ P. horsfieldii
(peninsular India) and ‘Ceylon Scimitar Babbler’ P.
melanurus , although Inskipp et al. (1996), in seemingly
their own taxonomic decision (or perhaps upholding one
common option against another), separated horsfieldii
(with melanurus ) from schisticeps ‘because they differ
morphologically, especially the subspecies of each form
that are nearest in geographical range.’ Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005) took this a step further: ‘if horsfieldii is
considered a distinct species from schisticeps, melanurus
probably should also be considered a distinct species, as
levels of vocal and morphological differentiation are
similar’. Nevertheless they conceded that, while plumage
and proportions are ‘distinctive’ and vocalisations
‘distinctly different’, melanurus ‘may respond strongly to
playback of S Indian horsfieldii tapes (DW [D.
Warakagoda]; further study needed.’
Justification of the separation of horsfieldii from
(nominate) schisticeps is not strictly needed, since it is
accepted by Inskipp etal. (1996) and indeed by Dickinson
(2003); but the score is low, with absence of rufous-
chestnut from neck-sides to flanks (3), duller upperparts
(1), crown concolorous with ear-coverts (rather than
several shades paler) ( 1 ), and dark not pale eye making for
a very different facial pattern (2) . Rasmussen and Anderton
(2005) actually reported that the vocalisations of horsfieldii
96
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
are similar to schisticeps and conceded that the two might
be ‘perhaps better treated as conspecific, as formerly’.
There is no evidence of morphometric disjunction; but
there are wild size differences in remaining schisticeps
anyway. Despite Rasmussen and Anderton’s doubts,
horsfieldii is so distinctive that specific status for it seems
appropriate.
However, Sri Lanka’s melanurus (with holdsworthi )
suggests a reversion to something closer to schisticeps. It
differs from horsfieldii in its rufescent-brown nape, neck-
sides and scapulars to rump and richer rufescent flanks
(2), yellower and smaller bill (2), much shorter tail (1) —
these two last judgements based on values in Rasmussen
and Anderton (2005) of ‘head’ 53-55 and tail 98-112
mm in horsfieldii vs 48-5 1 and 77-92 mm in melanurus —
and weaker lateral crown-stripes (1); in addition, the song
is reported by Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) to be
higher-pitched than horsfieldii, with more melodious and
less hollow-sounding notes (1). It differs from schisticeps
in its dark eye (2), shorter (vs 50-53 mm) bill (1), much
shorter (vs 107-122 mm) tail (2), dull rufescent-brown
(vs olive-brown) nape to rump (1), and very dull rufescent-
brown (vs bright rufous-chestnut) neck-sides and flanks
(1). Thus the separation from horsfieldii remains very
tenuous, particularly as a higher-pitched voice is probably
not independent of a smaller bill and probably body size.
However, despite many subspecies, horsfieldii is fairly
constant across the Indian subcontinent, so the Sri Lankan
population in no way reflects the end of a cline, and the
score of 7 should, for the moment, allow it species status.
Pomatorhinus (nificollis) musicus
Collar (2004b) suggested that the subspecies musicus might
merit elevation to species level. However, the Streak¬
breasted Scimitar Babbler P. ruficollis is a highly polytypic
species whose subspecies, differing principally in amount
and coloration of the breast-streaking, break down into
four groups. From the Himalayas east through western
China to Anhui and Zhejiang in the east are birds with
rather blurred greyish-buff breast-streaks (nominate
ruficollis, godzvini, bakeri, similis, laurentei, eidos and styanr,
probably also hunanensis, which BMNH lacks). To the
south, at Bhamo in northern Myanmar, south-west
Yunnan and through adjacent north and central Laos,
birds have virtually streakless whitish breasts (races
bhamoensis, albipectus and beaulieui) . In southern Yunnan
and in northern Vietnam ( reconditus ) and disjunctly in
south-east China (stridulus) are birds in which the breast-
streaks are rufous-chestnut. On Taiwan (musicus) and
Hainan (nigrostellatus) the breast-streaking is brownish-
black.
In Assamese bakeri the breast-streaking is weak,
indicating the tendency towards the all-whitish breast of
bhamoensis which continues through south-west Yunnan
to Laos . It is notable that the type locality of white-breasted
albipectus (Simao or Ssu-mao) is less than 250 km west of
the type locality of rufous-streaked reconditus (Mengtsze
or Mengzi), and that these two taxa extend respectively
into northern Laos and northern Vietnam. It is not
possible, however, to determine how closely they approach
each other, but in any case it is simpler at present to see
them as opposite ends of a ring. Vocal and genetic studies
might, however, reveal different circumstances.
This leaves the black-streaked Taiwan and Hainan
birds to consider. Collar (2004b) compared musicus only
to its nearest neighbour stridulus of Fujian and Guangdong,
and found strong differences, including in size. The
differences hold fairly well across the spectrum of races
westwards to India. Thus musicus possesses a dark greyish
(vs olive-toned) crown (2), broad rich chestnut hindcollar
(nape and mantle) (2), all-dark upper mandible (1),
brownish-black-streaked breast with clean-cut ovate
pattern ( 1 ) and strongly chestnut-washed belly and lower
Hanks (1); it has a significantly larger bill than any of the
other taxa and than all other taxa combined (1) (14%
larger/longer than all other taxa combined) . This tallies 8,
and if the report by Rasmussen and Anderton (2005)
applies solely to musicus, that its song is ‘lower-pitched
with 3-4 upturned notes all on same pitch’, a further
point or two might be added; but of course a sampling
across the wide range and numerous taxa is needed before
any serious use of vocal information can be made. I suggest
the name Taiwan Scimitar Babbler.
A comment on nigrostellatus is appropriate. This form,
although dorsally similar to mainland taxa, shares the
brownish-black breast-streaking of musicus , but in a
different pattern, since the breast feathers retain attenuated
white fringes, creating a scalier appearance, although in
worn specimens this effect is lost and the breast is crowded
with dark feathers, allowing little white background (contra
the constant bold contrast of black and white in musicus)',
on the belly there is a tendency to chestnut, but the flanks
are darker and predominantly olive. Scoring of the
underparts of musicus would be higher without these echoes
in nigrostellatus, which remains as a subspecies of ruficollis.
[Rimator (tnalacoptilus) malacoptilus
Rimator (malacoptilus) albostriatus
Rimator (tnalacoptilus) pasquieri
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) restricted Long-billed
Wren Babbler R. malacoptilus to monotypy: ‘Best
considered a separate species from taxa of Sumatra and
Tonkin (albostriatus and pasquieri respectively) based on
strikingly different plumage and apparent vocalisations.’
It is not clear if they are proposing albostriatus and pasquieri
as two species rather than one.
Based on rather small samples, both albostriatus and
pasquieri are distinct from malacoptilus in having a clean
white chin and throat (rather than dull buff) (3), whiter
centres to the long white feathers of the underparts (1),
with dark brown rather than rusty-rufous thighs and vent
(1); albostriatus has dark moustachial and malar stripes
enclosing a whitish submoustachial (2) and is considerably
larger (2); pasquieri has plain mouse-brown ear-coverts
(1) and slightly longer bill and tarsi (1). Thus albostriatus
and pasquieri separate out from malacoptilus as at least one
species, but their separation from each other at species
level is also tenable. Apart from their difference in size (1)
(Tables 1-2), their head patterns are different: albostriatus
has a darker crown with no rusty fringes (a character
pasquieri shares with malacoptilus) ( 1 ), streaked ear-coverts
(a character it shares with malacoptilus) (1), bold malar
stripe offsetting whitish submoustachial (2), and ‘soft’
lower edge to white throat where pasquieri has a clearer-
cut white edge and the white, which is also brighter and
cleaner, tucking around onto the lower neck-sides behind
the lower ear-coverts (2) . It is noteworthy that R. pasquieri
was one of only two new taxa (out of 30) which were
allowed full species status by Delacour and Jabouille
( 1 930) — where Spelaeomis ( longicaudatus [- chocolatinus])
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
97
kinneari was also first described — but they gave no reasons
for being so confident of this judgement. I suggest ‘White-
throated Wren Babbler’ for R. pasquieri (see under
Spelaeomis kinneari for reason not to use ‘Tonkin Wren
Babbler’) and ‘Sumatran Wren Babbler’ for R. albostriatus.
Napothera (rabori) sorsogonensis
Rabor’s Babbler N. rabori was only described in 1960, but
within 1 1 years it was known by three subspecies. It was
first found in the far north of Luzon (nominate rabori :
Rand 1960), then in the far south ( sorsogonensis : Rand
and Rabor 1 967), and finally in the middle ( mesoluzonica :
duPont 1971a), although ironically it is this last subspecies
which is now much the best represented in museums (I
am aware of three, five and 17 specimens respectively of
the three taxa, in nine museums), much the most familiar
to birdwatchers, and the one accorded the baseline
description and an illustration in Kennedy et al. (2000).
When sorsogonensis was first described, it was given
species status. Since the senior author was also the
describer of rabori and the junior author had collected
both taxa and been honoured in the naming of the first,
one must assume their considerable authority in this
judgement. One must also assume that D. S. Rabor
supplied information on the appearance of nominate
rabori , since no adult specimen was available to refer to,
for the following diagnosis of sorsogonensis , quoted in full
from Rand and Rabor (1967), to be made:
Similar to N. rabori but differs in having the crown
olive much like the back (not reddish brown); in
having the feathers of the back with narrow,
indistinct, black edgings giving only a faint scaled
pattern (not with a distinct scaled pattern); side of
head dark grey to blackish, finely streaked or washed
with white (not bright reddish brown); chin and
throat white with a narrow black malar line separated
from the dark grey side of the head by a broader
white stripe (not white generally spotted with black) ;
sides of breast uniform grey, connected across the
breast by a narrow, uniform dark grey band;
contrasting sharply with white on central part of
lower breast and abdomen (not breast widely grey
with a streaked and scaled pattern shading to grey-
white of abdomen); wing slightly longer.
The fact that sorsogonensis was at one end of Luzon and
rabori at the other meant that any intervening population
might be intermediate, and this is in fact how duPont
(1971a) thought of it when he named mesoluzonica, so
that he reduced all three taxa to subspecies of rabori.
Although lamenting that the only specimens available of
nominate rabori were ‘immatures’, he felt confident enough
to characterise the differences of mesoluzonica from rabori
merely in terms of its narrower black margins on the crown
and back and its lighter ‘chestnut and red-brown
underparts’ (sic), while from sorsogonensis the new form
differed in possessing the said black margins above, a
wider breast-band and ‘richer’ flanks and undertail-
coverts. Similar diagnoses are given in duPont (1971b).
Unsurprisingly, therefore, Mayr and Vuilleumier
(1983), who referred the reader to duPont (1971b) and
doubtless themselves were guided by it, merely remarked
that ‘the differences... are insufficient in our opinion to
justify species status’, although they added, without
offering space for his reasons, that ‘D. Amadon (pers.
comm.) would keep it as a species’. Neither Dickinson et
al. (1991) nor Kennedy et al. (2000) sought to overturn
this taxonomic decision (in spite of their championing of
the separation of Golden-crowned Babbler Stachyris
dennistouni, a taxon which shares largely the same range
as nominate rabori ), and the latter merely indicated that
‘races vary primarily by color of face — chestnut in rabori
and dark brown in others’.
It is not at all clear from any of the preceding
publications how far the number and type of differences
itemised by Rand and Rabor (1967) were considered.
Thus it is not just a case of differing judgement over
whether the characters shown by a taxon qualify it for
species or subspecies status: it is rather a case where the
characters to be judged are themselves uncertain. That
they are stronger than indicated by duPont (1971a,b) —
who completely missed the ‘bright reddish brown’ ear-
coverts of rabori — and even by Kennedy et al. (2000)
cannot be in doubt. To begin with, the colour of the ‘face’
in sorsogonensis and mesoluzonica is neither dark brown
nor dark grey to blackish, but mid-grey with varying
amounts of white flecking (specimens seen in AMNH,
BMNH, Naturalis, USNM; also de Roever 1990).
Danielsen et al. (1994) reported that two birds, one
definitely adult, which they caught in the early 1990s in
the northern Sierra Madre ‘had no white on breast and
belly’. A bird seen by S. Harrap (in litt. 2006) on 16
February 2002 in the T alaytay watershed, Aurora province
( 1 6° 1 0'34"N 1 2 1 °5 5' 1 0"E) had ‘white supercilium, bright
rusty cheeks, black moustachial and narrow collar across
upper breast, bordering white throat, mid-grey
underparts’, the implication again being that the breast
and belly of rabori lacks white or has the white largely
occluded.
Prompted by this uncertainty, I obtained photographs
of one of the birds caught by F. Danielsen at Maconacon
in April 1997 (Plate 2), of a watercolour painting by M.
K. Poulsen of one of the birds mentioned by Danielsen et
al. (1994) (Plate 3), and of a specimen in Cincinnati
Museum ofNatural History (CMNH 377 1 0), mentioned
in Kennedy et al. (2000) (Plate 4). From this composite
evidence emerge the following diagnostic characters of
rabori (in relation to both sorsogonensis and its evident
subspecies mesoluzonica ), which I score accordingly:
forehead, supercilium and sides of head bright rusty-
chestnut (3); much smaller white throat-patch, not
extending onto upper breast (2) , with black malar breaking
up on lower throat into random spotting (this, when the
neck is withdrawn, forms the narrow black collar observed
by Harrap) (2); grey breast to mid-belly, with narrow
white shaft-streaks (and in one specimen some blackish
scaling), shading to greyish-white lower belly (2); overall
richer, redder brown upperparts, possibly with heavier
blackish barring (1). There is a trace of white above the
eye and there are various possible explanations (sex or age
difference; individual variation) for the white supercilium
seen by Harrap, who also reports (in litt. 2006) that he has
noticed no vocal differences between mesoluzonica and
rabori. Nevertheless, as the photographs of specimens of
mesoluzonica (Plates 5-7) indicate, the great distinctiveness
of nominate rabori is now established, and clearly merits
recognition from sorsogonensis and mesoluzonica at the
species level.
A further interesting divergence between rabori and
sorsogonensis lies in the juvenile plumages. In N. sorsogonensis
mesoluzonica there is relatively little difference from the
98
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
adult: Mitchell and Harrap (1994) observed a begging
juvenile which ‘possessed the conspicuous wing spots and
white throat of the adult [but] overall... was a slightly
warmer and buffer brown’. By contrast, juvenile rabori has
a largely obscured throat with some whitish feathers, dark
reddish-brown breast and flanks with some grey feathering,
and greyish shading paler (some whitish) on the mid-belly,
with reddish-brown crown, blackish-brown upperparts and
chestnut face and ear-coverts (Rand 1960, supplemented
and modified by photographs of the type sent by M.
Hennen and by inspection of USNM 607458).
The generic status and position of these two Philippine
Napothera are discussed below, and consideration of new
English names invited.
Pnoepyga (albiv enter) formosana
C. R. Robson in Inskipp et al. (1996) suggested that
‘ formosana is sufficiently different in morphology and
vocalisations to warrant treatment as a separate species’.
Collar (2004b), however, saw too few dissimilarities to
find the split of this taxon very convincing.
Work by Harrap (1989) established the criteria for
separating Scaly-breasted Wren Babbler P. albiventer from.
Pygmy Wren Babbler P. pusilla in the field and set out a
good case for aligning the wren babbler on Taiwan with
the former rather than the latter. Criteria for discriminating
albiventer from pusilla, as restated and refined by Robson
(2000) and Rasmussen and Anderton (2005), are: pusilla
slightly smaller and slimmer, with no speckling on crown,
neck-sides and ear-coverts, song an unmistakable ti-ti-tu
or tseet tsuut but call ( tchit or tsickf) very like Scaly-breasted.
I do not share the latter authors’ view that the underpart
scaling of albiventer is ‘more evenly rounded’ than on
pusilla : on BMNH specimens there is a marked tendency
for the pattern on albiventer to be dominated by the black
blade-like centres to the feathers (which themselves are
longer, more oblong, than on pusilla), and these occupy
the entire underparts, whereas in pusilla the centres are
both less black (more blackish-brown) and less blade¬
like, so that more white (or ochre) of the outer vanes is
apparent and the dark fringes of each feather (also present
but much less intense on albiventer) are commonly offset
against the whitish (or ochre) part of the underlying feather,
especially on the lower underparts. Two effects result,
upsetting expectations of both the English and scientific
names of the former: Scaly-breasted ( albiventer ) looks
both less scaly-breasted and less white below than Pygmy
( pusilla ) .
Unquestionably, formosana is closer to albiventer than
pusilla (an ochre-bellied morph, as found in the other two
taxa, has not been recorded), so it is against the former
that I score it. If anything the underparts are darker than
in albiventer, since the white on the breast and belly feathers
is reduced (1), and importantly the ‘scaling’ extends, as
noted by Harrap (1989), up to the chin, so that formosana
lacks a white chin and throat (2). The buffy spotting on
the crown is fuller and more tinged rufous even than in
ochre morphs of albiventer ( 1). Mensurally formosana has
a bill as long as (or even longer than) albiventer (although
visibly slenderer) but a wing and tarsus much shorter
(respectively 15% and 10% shorter, these differences being
statistically highly significant; see Tables 1-2), so that in
these two characters it sits between albiventer and pusilla
(1) (Tables 1-2). Harrap (1989) had access to two tape-
recordings offormosana which allowed him to characterise
its song as ‘a fast strong warble, rather shorter but otherwise
very similar to that of Scaly-breasted’, but his sonagrams
certainly suggest a plainer, simpler, more even song than
in albiventer (2). However, P. I. Holt (in litt. 2006) insists
that the call and song offormosana are ‘both massively
different’ from either albiventer or pusilla, and in April
2005 found that two male formosana at Chingjing failed
to respond to playback of the songs of the other two species.
In any case, a score of 7 takes ‘Taiwan Wren Babbler’ to
species level.
Spelaeornis (caudatus) badeigularis D
Inskipp et al. (1996) provided a brief history of Rusty-
throated Wren Babbler S'. badeigularis, pointing out its
reinstatement as a full species by Ali and Ripley (1971),
who, in comparing it with Rufous-throated Wren Babbler
5. caudatus, wrote: ‘The white chin, the dark chestnut
feathers with darker-streaked centres of the throat and
upper breast, and the extensive area all over the lower
breast, abdomen, flanks and vent of the subterminal white-
tipped bistre feathers, give an entirely different appearance
to this bird.’ They also noted its longer, ‘thicker and
stronger’ tarsus, 20 mm vs 1 7-1 8 mm, ‘a small difference
on paper, but appearing significant when these tiny birds
are in the hand’. Dickinson (2003), listing it as a subspecies
of caudatus, either did not see or did not accept Ali and
Ripley’s argument, commenting that ‘as [ badeigularis ] is
still essentially unknown (based on one specimen) we
prefer not to treat this as a species’. However, there is no
taxonomic reasoning per se in this decision, and the white
chin (and upper throat) (1), dark chestnut breast with
dark-streaked centres (2), greater amount of barring on
the underparts (2) and stouter tarsus (1) offered as
diagnostic by Ali and Ripley (1971), plus the dark brown
(vs rufescent) flanks and vent, and darker upperparts and
darker grey ear-coverts (1) noted by Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005), suggest that species status is just
warranted for this taxon. My own examination of the
type, alongside specimens of caudatus, fully supports the
notion that the two taxa are better considered species
(including confirming the longer tarsus with a width of
1.9 mm vs 1.45-1.65 mm in three caudatus), and Plate 8
shows how the chestnut of the lower throat and upper
breast is restricted in a way quite different to that on
caudatus, where it spreads onto the upper breast-sides
and Hanks, and down towards the belly; the breast-sides
in badeigularis are, in marked contrast, covered with the
blackish-and-white barring of the lower breast.
The rediscovery of badeigularis, near the type locality,
on 1 8 November 2004, by B. F. King and J. P. Donahue,
involved the use of a recording of caudatus to lure it into
view (http://www.kolkatabirds.com/wrenbabbler.htm;
also World Birdwatch 27 [2]: 2 [June 2005]). However,
despite its responsiveness to caudatus song, B. F. King (in
litt. 2006) reports that the song it sang in reply was rather
different, which suggests a further score of at least 1 . Most
striking of all are Donahue’s frontal photographs of
badeigularis posted on the above website, which show that,
in presumably combative excitement, the species discloses
a distinct whitish crescent on the lower edge of the chestnut
throat, which indicates a markedly different signal from
what caudatus, with its much more extensive rufous throat
and breast, could produce (2). (This breast-band is not
apparent on the female type.) Thus badeigularis achieves
a relatively strong score of 10.
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
99
This analysis was completed independently of King
and Donahue (2006).
Spelaeornis (chocolatinus) reptatus ^
Spelaeornis (chocolatinus) oatesi %
Spelaeornis (chocolatinus) kinneari
C. R. Robson (in Inskipp et al. 1996) observed that the
taxa reptatus/kinneari and oatesi ‘differ significantly’ in both
plumage and voice, while chocolatinus remained
unrecorded, leading to the remark that more than one
species maybe involved. Rasmussen and Anderton (2005)
made the following comment under ‘Naga Wren Babbler’
5. chocolatinus : ‘Marked morphological differences
between oatesi [Chin HillsWren Babbler] , chocolatinus and
reptatus [Grey-bellied Wren Babbler], all usually treated
as races of Spelaeornis chocolatinus , suggest that species
status is warranted for each. The songs of oatesi and reptatus
differ significantly, but that of chocolatinus is
undocumented; further study needed’. Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005) also said, under oatesi itself: ‘Differs
markedly in plumage and degree of sexual dimorphism
from 5. chocolatinus , but song of latter unknown. Nagaland
specimen(s) identified as oatesi perhaps indicate sympatry
with chocolatinus .’
They provided the following account of reptatus
(scoring in round brackets mine, referring to their
comparison with chocolatinus ): ‘somewhat shorter-tailed
than similar [chocolatinus] and [ oatesi ] (1), with stronger
black scales above (1), and duller and greyer below (1)
with white speckles and broader blackish scales (vs very
fine flecks) (1); chin mottled (1), and pale shaft-streaks
on flanks not prominent (2)’. Vocal differences between
reptatus and chocolatinus can now be checked as the voice
of the latter has very recently been recorded by M.
Ritschard (inlitt. 2006), but a score of 7 already establishes
reptatus as a species. From the descriptions and sonagrams
in Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) vocal differences
between reptatus and oatesi are evidently very strong (3),
and in other respects oatesi is highly distinct from both
reptatus and chocolatinus: ‘lacks rufous and tawny tones
below of similar [chocolatinus] and female [reptatus] (1)...
[with] brownish face without blackish moustachial line
(1) and white throat and breast with dense, large black
flecks (3)’. On the basis of these descriptions, backed by
comparison of material in AMNH and BMNH, and even
in the absence of vocal evidence concerning ‘nominate’
chocolatinus , it is appropriate to accept the three-way split
of chocolatinus as made by Rasmussen and Anderton
(2005).
I am grateful to a referee (P. D. Round) for pointing
out that this arrangement omitted to indicate the position
of the isolated taxon kinneari from T onkin, Vietnam, which
has commonly been treated as a race of S. chocolatinus
(e.g. Deignan 1964, Clements 2000, Dickinson 2003).
This timely reminder inevitably came after my visits to
various museums where more comprehensive assessment
of specimens could have been made, leaving me just two
female specimens in BMNH to refer to — these from the
three males, eight females and one unsexed in the original
series (Delacour and Jabouille 1930) — and rather little
good material with which to compare them. Nevertheless,
a conclusion can be reached. On vocal evidence C. R.
Robson (in Inskipp et al. 1996) had associated kinneari
with the geographically closest reptatus (and neither
chocolatinus nor oatesi are morphologically closer) but in
Robson (2000) such evidence was important in
distinguishing between the two:
S. c. reptatus: Sings with a repeated, decelerating
trill: pwwrriii’i’i’i’ or pwzvrree’e’e’e V. S’, c. kinneari:
Sings with two types of trill (repeated after intervals),
which slow towards end: (1) loud rapid
chwi’i’i’i’witchu-wit, chwiwiwwi’i’witchu-wit and
chwwwwiiviwi-witchu-wit etc. (1.5-2 s long), with
stressed ending; (2) churrrrrr’r’r-r-rt-rt-yut-yut-yut-
yut (2-2.5 s long), stuttering in middle and
becoming spaced and fuller-sounding.
These transcriptions, although both of a trill-type song,
suggest clearly different vocalisations (score 2-3). In
addition, by reference to accounts in Robson (2000) and
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005), as well as to the two
BMNH skins (one of which is in ‘male’ dress: see below)
and to the (male) type of reptatus (BMNH
1 903. 1 2.24.233), it is possible to assemble the following
points of divergence: kinneari possesses a darker
moustachial line (1) and, unlike reptatus (which is
misrepresented on this feature on Plate 90, Figure 1 1 a, in
Robson 2000), the male has a distinct whitish chin and
throat (buffy in female) (2), and both sexes are darker
grey on breast and belly with stronger scaling below (2).
Among their series of 12 specimens, Delacour and
Jabouille (1930, 1931) remarked that they had two females
with white throats, the others buff and with the brown of
the plumage noticeably more chestnut, and thus
concluded that females are dimorphic. This is not per se
a taxonomic character, although it tends to suggest a
further degree of distinctiveness from reptatus (the type of
which is slightly smaller than the two BMNH skins of
kinneari ); in any case a score of 7-8 suggests that kinneari
(Pale-throated Wren Babbler; to echo White-throated
Wren Babbler for the sympatric Rimator pasquieri , and to
avoid ‘Tonkin Wren Babbler’ for either) merits species
status.
Sphenocichla (humei) roberti%
Of the form roberti (‘Cachar Wedge-billed Babbler’)
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) wrote: ‘Strikingly
different from S. humei [‘Sikkim Wedge-billed Babbler’]
in many aspects of plumage, without any evidence of
intergradation despite close geographic approach.
Doubtless better considered a separate species on basis of
morphology; comparative study ofvocalisations desirable
when recordings of roberti become available’.
The morphological characters separating these two
taxa are embedded in the descriptive text of roberti by
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005). Reference to material
in BMNH confirms their diagnosis. Where humei is
brownish-black below with whitish shaft-streaks (itself a
remarkable pattern), roberti possesses a far more dramatic
pattern of triangular (chevron-shaped) scales involving
broad buffy-brown feather-centres, whitish fringes in a
pointed V, and dark outer fringes (vane extensions), so
that the underparts are far lighter than in humei, especially
at the chin and upper throat where the whitish fringes are
broadest (3; this score does scant justice to the difference,
which might better be expressed as 2 for paler coloration,
1 for loss of shaft-streaks and 2 for fringing pattern, = 5) .
On the lores and forecrown, where /wwcihas black feathers
with whitish shaft-streaks, roberti is rusty-brown with
vaguely darker edging (1). Where humei shows a fairly
distinct whitish postocular supercilium that carries down
100
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
the neck-sides, roberti possesses a line of more disjunct
whitish spots that merges with the pattern of triangular
scales on the neck-sides (1). Where humei has narrow,
bright golden feather-centres (with well-spaced vanes)
broadly fringed black from mid-crown to nape, making
for a streaked effect, roberti has broad, warm buff-brown
feather-centres with blackish-brown fringes, some with
whitish inner fringes, making for a scaled effect (2), both
effects becoming weaker on the lower upperparts. The
wings and tail of humei are blackish-brown, those of roberti
dull rufous-tinged brown (1). Rasmussen and Anderton
(2005) describe roberti as larger, with a larger, blunter bill;
the latter difference is moderate (6%) but statistically
significant (and the horizontally blunter bill of roberti is
borne out in the BMNH sample), but the tail is notably
shorter (9% difference; highly statistically significant)
(score 1; Tables 1-2). A score of 9-11 affirms roberti as a
full species (a situation long in need of rectification).
P. I. Holt ( inlitt . 2006) affirms that while the taxa have
two calls that are quite similar, such that roberti in western
Yunnan responded well to recordings of both calls by
humei in Bhutan, their songs are ‘remarkably different’,
and in the same experiment no roberti showed any response
to playback of singing humei. This clearly adds another
score of 3, and places the split beyond any doubt.
A problem with English names for these two species
arises from the fact that both are ‘Wedge-billed Babblers’ .
Retention of this name reflects their relationship, but the
addition of further descriptors (‘Sikkim’ and ‘Cachar’ or
‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’) is unwieldy. Reduction to
‘Wedgebill’ cannot be countenanced as this name is, as it
were, preoccupied. Apossible solution is to create entirely
fresh names, e.g. Chevron-breasted Babbler for 5. roberti
and Blackish-breasted Babbler for S. humei.
A full documentation of the differences between the
two taxa, including a detailed vocal analysis, is in
preparation by P. C. Rasmussen and P. I. Holt.
Stachyris (plateni) pygmaea
Considering some of the Philippine babblers, J. Delacour,
in Delacour and Mayr (1945), wrote:
On account of the rather considerable differences
in colors, we prefer to consider [Stachyris] capitalist
nigrocapitata and dennistouni as three species forming
a superspecies. A. plateni (Mindanao) and 5.
pygmaea (Leyte and Samar) are conspecific, the
latter being much grayer and less distinctly marked
but quite similar in proportions, pattern and size.
However, in reality there are ‘considerable differences in
colors’ between plateni and pygmaea also, far too
remarkable to be so readily set aside. Where pygmaea is
dull olive-brown above, slightly warmer on the crown,
and with insignificant pale shaft-streaking, plateni is a
tinge rustier and, on the crown, blackish frontally shading
to dull chestnut behind, with bold white coronal shaft¬
streaking (3); similarly, where pygmaea is mid-grey to
greyish-olive from chin to breast and flanks, with diffuse
white streaks along the shafts making a soft pattern
spreading out from the chin, plateni is blackish on the chin
and throat shading to dull chestnut on the lower throat
and breast and to rusty-buff on the flanks (2) with very
bold, mostly white feathers bunching under the chin and
radiating onto the breast in sharp narrow white streaks
with slightly bulbous tips (2), creating a totally different
pattern. Because pygmaea has the lores darker brown than
the crown and riding over the eye in a vague supercilium
(1), while in plateni the crown, lores and supercilium are
equally dark, the difference in pattern when specimens
are viewed frontally is even more striking. Mensurally
there are small but statistically significant differences
between the two taxa, with pygmaea slightly shorter in bill
(5%) and wing (8%) and markedly shorter in tail (11%)
(score 1 ; Tables 1-2). A score of 9 indicates that the two
taxa — Visayan Pygmy Babbler 5. pygmaea and Mindanao
Pygmy Babbler S. plateni — are unquestionably better
regarded as two species.
Macronous (gularis) bornensis
Throughout most of its substantial range, the Striped
Tit-babbler M. gularis is characterised by its rufous crown
shading to pale olive -brown mantle and back with rufous-
tinged wings and tail, pale yellow underparts, supercilium
and lores with fine black streaks from chin to breast. This
roughly holds for all of continental Asia plus Sumatra and
its satellite islands and Palawan in the Philippines. However,
on Borneo and its associated islands and Java the situation
changes rather dramatically: birds here are larger ( 1 ; T ables
1-2), rich chestnut above (3) with blackish or dark grey
supercilium and lores (2), stonier-white below with little
if any yellow (2) with broad black streaking, usually
including a distinct malar or submoustachial stripe (3).
Taxa belonging to M. gularis are, as recognised by
(and in the sequence of) Dickinson (2003): rubricapilla ,
ticehursti, sulphureus, lutescens, kinneari, versuricola,
saraburiensis, connectens, inveteratus, condorensis,
archipelagus, chersonesophilus, gularis and Palawan’s highly
disjunct and slightly anomalous woodi. T axa belonging to
M. bornensis are: zopherus, zaperissus, everetti, javanicus,
bornensis , montanus, cagayanensis and argenteus. Some of
the insular forms are less chestnut and rather greyer above,
as is the rather distinctive montanus, and the subspecies
zopherus, from the Anamba Islands, has a supercilium
‘olive-buff, with obscure streaks of dusky’ (Oberholser
1917), which makes it, as its geographical position might
indicate, a link to mainland forms of gularis; on the other
side, nominate gularis from Sumatra is notable for an
increase in the intensity of the breast-streaking, again
indicating a bridging tendency towards bornensis and its
races. Nevertheless, the heavily streaked and lightly
streaked taxa continue to fall into two distinct groupings
based on the above characters.
That these two groups represent two well-separated
lineages is at least hinted at by the co-occurrence on Java
of what is here to be called M. b. javanicus and Grey¬
cheeked Tit-babbler M. flavicollis, which is very similar in
appearance to M. g. woodi of Palawan. Whether in fact
woodi might be considered specifically separate from the
rest of gularis is a question worthy of further investigation,
but on simple morphological evidence it does not meet
the level of distinctiveness here needed for such
recognition. Meanwhile, to maintain some continuity in
the established English name I suggest that AL gularis
might be known as Pin-striped Tit-babbler and M.
bornensis as Bold-striped Tit-babbler.
Micromacronus (leytensis) sordidus
This tiny and remarkable Philippine babbler falls into two
markedly different subspecies. By comparison with the
nominate leytensis (Leyte and Samar), which is bright
yellow below and dirty yellow-green above with broad
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
101
bold yellow lores and supercilium, the Mindanao form
sordidus is overall much duller, without the bright yellow
tones. Thus above it is a shade duller and greyer (1),
below pale yellowish-grey to greenish-olive (2), with a
horn-grey (not black), paler-based and slenderer bill (1)
and, perhaps most crucially, grey-green lores and
supercilium, continuous with the crown (3). According
to the original diagnosis, sordidus is a larger bird (wing
average 44.6 [43-47, n=5] vs 40.8 [40.5-41, n=2]; tail
average 30.6 [30-31, n=5| vs 27.5 [27-28, n=2]) than
nominate leytensis, but with shorter elongated back and
flank plumes (score 1-2) (Ripley and Rabor 1968). Rand
(1970) had speculated that sordidus merited specific rank,
and in this review a score of 8-9 carries it there, and for
it I suggest the name Mindanao Miniature Babbler (with
Visayan Miniature Babbler for M. leytensis).
Turdoides caudata huttoni%
‘Based on morphology and noticeably different
vocalisations from T. caudata , huttoni (with salvadorii of
Iran and Iraq) is clearly better considered a separate
species’, wrote Rasmussen and Anderton (2005).
Although lying almost outside the Asian (Oriental) region,
huttoni occurs in a small area of westernmost Pakistan and
in any case is a potential split from a taxon in the Asian
region, so it merits consideration here.
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) distinguished huttoni
from caudata by its larger size, heavier, longer bill, paler,
greyer plumage generally, dark streaks on breast and sides,
and relatively distinctive vocalisations; in their illustration
caption they also mention its lack of rufous tones on cheek
and flanks. They characterised the north-west Indian
subspecies eclipes of caudata as ‘slightly larger and paler
overall than widespread nominate’. However, in
reinstating eclipes as a subspecies, Abdulali and D’Cunha
(1982) produced data suggesting that eclipes sits fairly
well between caudata and huttoni in size (Table 3) : in terms
of wing and tail it is certainly more than ‘slightly’ larger
than caudata, and while the bill of huttoni emerges as
decidedly longer, there is considerable overlap in ranges.
My own sampling in BMNH clearly suggests a progressive
increase in bill length ( caudata 20. 1 ± 0.34, range 18-22,
n = 16, eclipes 21.3 ± 0.26, range 20-23, n = 13, huttoni
23.1 ± 0.35, range 21-25, n = 16; caudata vs eclipes P <
0.05, eclipes vs huttoni P < 0.01, caudata vs huttoni P <
0.001). Thus it seems that huttoni, rather than being a
sharp step up in size from caudata (including eclipes), is at
the end of an east-west stepped dine in increasing size.
Nor is it obvious that the ‘paler, greyer plumage
generally’ is anything more than subspecific variation in
shading. Laid out dorsally and ventrally, the samples from
Table 3. Means of measurements of specimens of Turdoides caudata
in Bombay Natural History Society as provided by Abdulali and
D’Cunha (1982). Sample sizes were 27 males and 10 females of caudata,
five males and five females of eclipes, and four males and three females
of huttoni. Bill measurements contrast with my own from skull, so are
presumably from feathering.
which I derive my bill measurements above show huttoni
to be noticeably paler and greyer than the other two taxa
on the lower upperparts, tail and especially wings, more
consistently to possess light streaking (it is misleading to
describe it as ‘dark’) on the breast-sides, and indeed to be
less suffused with ‘rufous tones’ (these are in any case
very weak and more a matter of intensity of buff) on
cheeks and flanks. Again, however, there is a degree of
overlap: a specimen of eclipes from Punjab (BMNH
1949.25.2796) is almost identical in size to one of huttoni
from Baluchistan (BMNH 1923.12.23.67) (respectively
bill 21, 22; tarsus 32, 30; wing 76, 83; tail 118, 119) and
has stronger streaking on the breast-sides. Altogether,
therefore, one might score huttoni 1 for greater size
(including bill), 1 for greater pallor (including loss of
‘rufous tones’) and 1 for streaked breast. Vocalisations in
huttoni may be distinctive, but the degree of variation in
caudata and indeed in Turdoides babblers generally suggests
that a great deal of sampling is needed before a solid
conclusion on this point can be reached. Certainly the
two sets of sonagrams for caudata in Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005), from Rajasthan and southern Pakistan,
appear as different from each other as either is from the
one set they provide for huttoni, and the impression one
has from them is that a relatively small subset of calls or
songs has been captured. In any case, even were huttoni
to score 3 for major vocal differences, it would still fall
short of the threshold for species status. Pending further
review, therefore, it would appear to be simpler at present
to leave it as a race of caudata.
Babax lanceolatus ivoodi ^
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) wrote: ‘Lushai Hills
and Chin Hills woodi is markedly dissimilar in several
aspects of morphology (e.g. blackish-streaked vs more
uniform rufous crown, blackish-streaked vs rufous-
streaked mantle to rump, upperparts feathers edged buff
not grey, moustache solid black) and in vocalisations from
B. lanceolatus... of E Tibet, S China and N Myanmar, and
is probably better treated as a full species; further study
needed’. These authors, who despite these comments
provisionally retained ivoodi in lanceolatus, offered several
sonagrams of singing ivoodi and lanceolatus which certainly
suggest a difference, but given that (a) several song-types
occur in woodi ( lanceolatus is not otherwise represented in
the book), and (b) variation both within and between
populations of lanceolatus must be expected, confidence
that these distinctions are consistent cannot be particularly
strong.
Based on the one specimen of woodi in BMNH (type
of ‘victoriae1 , 1905.9.10.733) and five in AMNH, woodi
looks very similar to many specimens of lanceolatus. In
lanceolatus the centres to the feathers from crown to rump
are dark chestnut, with buffy-brown fringes on the crown
and greyish-buff fringes on the dorsal area, whereas in
woodi the centres are blackish, the fringes on the dorsal
area buffy, and the feathers on the crown longer, with
more chestnut edging, making altogether for a bolder
upperpart pattern (2). The throat (always) and upper
breast (usually) of lanceolatus are unmarked creamy-white
with very fine dark streaks emerging on the lower breast,
whereas in woodi there is very fine dark streaking from the
throat down, with fuller, darker-centred streaking on lower
underparts ( 1 ) . In lanceolatus the submoustachial stripe is
variable, from chestnut to blackish-chestnut, while in woodi
102
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
it is black or at least blackish (1). The label of the type of
victoriae mentions ‘irides yellow, bill dark horny, legs and
feet lighter’; that of a specimen of lanceolatus (BMNH
1937. 1 .7.297) states ‘iris yellow, bill black, l.f. [legs and
feet] horny grey’, which suggests no serious difference in
bare-part coloration between the taxa. Mensurally zvoodi
is very slightly larger in bill, tarsus and wing, but not
statistically significantly so, and significantly shorter-tailed,
albeit only by 4% ( P< 0.05) (no score — see Introduction,
Tables 1-2). Altogether, on present evidence (score 4)
the better option at present is to continue to regard zvoodi
as a moderately distinctive subspecies of lanceolatus.
Cutia (nipalensis) legalleni
Photographs in Collar (2003) indicated the candidacy of
this split. The form legalleni (south-central Vietnam) is
very distinct from other taxa in Cutia Cutia nipalensis, in
the following ways: in both sexes, the entire underparts
except for the chin and throat-sides are barred black (2),
the wing is shorter ( 1 ), the tail is longer so that the distance
between the elongated uppertail-coverts and tail-tip is
longer (1), and the white outer tail-tips are distinct (in
other subspecies vestigial or absent) (no score); in the
male, the rufous uppeiparts are darker, becoming chestnut
on the uppertail-coverts ( 1 ); in the female, the lores, crown,
nape and ear-coverts are drab brown, whereas the crown
and nape are greyish-blue in other subspecies (2) , and the
base colour of the mantle, scapulars and back is duller,
deeper buff, and the dark spots are longer and stronger,
forming a streakier pattern (1). Tables 1-2 indicate the
mensural differences in question.
On this basis legalleni easily qualifies as a separate
species. However, the situation is complicated by the
recent description of the subspecies hoae (Eames 2002).
This new form, of which only the type is available in
BMNH and of which only male specimens have been
collected, is geographically close to legalleni and approaches
it in several features, namely the narrowness of the barring
on the underparts (not given a score above because of this
shared character), the larger white tail-tips than on other
taxa (but still not as extensive as in legalleni), the absence
of minute white (male) or whitish-buff (female) tips to the
outer vanes of the inner primaries and secondaries (present
in all other taxa), and grey {hoae) or buffy-grey {legalleni)
rather than buffy-olive (other taxa) scapulars. On the other
hand, the dorsal rufous is, as indicated by Eames (2002),
shaded as in subspecies melanochima rather than legalleni,
and my measurement of the tail of the type of hoae, 63
mm, coincides with that of Eames (2002) although the
uppertail-coverts fall 37 mm short of the tail-tip, which
may be an artefact of the preparation.
Eames (2002) was only able to note that in the field
the underparts of female hoae strongly resemble those of
the male. This then leaves unresolved whether female
hoae has crown and nape, and mantle, scapulars and back,
like melanochima or like legalleni. If they are like
melanochima, hoae belongs with nipalensis and legalleni
becomes a monotypic species. If they are like legalleni,
hoae belongs with legalleni, which becomes a polytypic
species — scoring 2 for narrowness of underpart barring
rather than completeness, 1 for longer distance between
uppertail-coverts and tail-tip (irrespective of tail length),
1 for absence of tiny white tips to flight feathers, 1 for
greater amount of white on tail-tips, and 2 and 1 for the
shared female features. On the basis of the greater known
similarities between hoae and legalleni than between hoae
and melanochima (the greatest of which is the all-white
chin to vent), it is perhaps better at present to assign hoae
to legalleni than to nipalensis.
The names Himalayan Cutia and Vietnamese Cutia
seem appropriate.
Gampsorhynchus (rufulus) torquatus $
Of nominate G. rufulus Rasmussen and Anderton (2005)
remarked: ‘Surely not conspecific with the extralimital
Gampsorhynchus [ rufulus ] torquatus, which has very different
vocalisations and several morphological distinctions. At
Namdapha (SE Arunachal), G. rufulus did not respond to
playback of torquatus tapes (CR [C. Robson])’.
Conflating general sources, as currently constituted
White-hooded Babbler G. rufulus occurs in the north-east
Indian subcontinent from east Nepal east to south-west
China and northern and western Myanmar west of the
Irrawaddy River (nominate rufulus), central and south¬
east Myanmar east of the Irrawaddy River, south-east
Yunnan and Thailand {torquatus), northern Indochina
{luciae) and extreme southern Thailand and Peninsular
Malaysia {saturiator) (Robson 2000, Dickinson 2003,
Rasmussen and Anderton 2005). There is no doubt that
the morphological shift from rufulus in the north-west to
luciae and saturiator in the south-east is a major one, such
as to invite considerable sympathy for a re-drawing of
species limits. Unfortunately, however, the intervening
populations of torquatus in Myanmar are relatively variable,
even within collecting localities. Such variation is not sex-
related and it seems not to be age-related. Thus BMNH
possesses two specimens of torquatus from the Karenni
region of eastern Myanmar (east of the Irrawaddy), one
(88.4.20.633) with an unbroken dark breast-band
(something otherwise only found in luciae ) and one
(82.1.20.955) with not a trace of one (as in nominate
rufulus)', from the closely adjacent Toungoo there is
another specimen (88.4.20.634) with not a trace of a
breast-band and indeed an all-white head (the two
preceding have some buff-brown feathering on the crown),
so that it can only be distinguished from nominate rufulus
by its slightly rustier buff-brown upperparts; exactly similar
specimens (1924.12.22.20 and AMNH 203972) come
from further south-east, at Umphang on the Thai side of
the international border. Moreover, there is a specimen
(1938.4.14.23) from west of the Irrawaddy, on the
Chindwin River, which shows a trace of the breast-side
(half-collar) mark that characterises torquatus. These
central Myanmar birds are, on average, relatively lightly
stained orange-buff below, whereas birds from T enasserim
are generally more strongly marked on the underparts,
and the half-collar is darker and more obvious. Variation
in the development of the half-collar and the intensity of
the staining continues in Thailand, and the characters
only become much more stable in the populations as they
reach their southern {saturiator) and eastern {luciae)
extremes.
It is therefore initially somewhat problematic to
characterise and score the differences between nominate
rufulus and the remaining taxa in torquatus. The most
constant features of the latter are rustier-brown upperparts
(score 1), stronger buff-tan staining below (1), a short
half-collar on the breast-side (1-2), the reduction to a few
white feathers of the generally prominent (though often
partly concealed) white wing-slash (median and lesser
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
103
Table 4. Proportions of specimens of Gampsorhynchus rufulus (= nominate; here split) and G. torquatus (with other races except rufulus ) in various
museums (initials glossed in Introduction) which show a foxy-rufous crown indicating immaturity. FMNH = Field Museum of Natural History,
Chicago (data from D. E. Willard in litt. 2006).
coverts) of rufulus (2), and a tendency to buff-brown
feathers in the (usually hind-) crown (no score) . However,
C. R. Robson (verbally 2006) possesses tape-recordings
of torquatus and subspecies to the east, and of rufulus from
throughout its Himalyan and Thai range, and reports
that the vocalisations are constant within these two
groupings and entirely different from each other (3) . Thus,
despite the anomalies that appear in the Irrawaddy basin
(the situation at Umphang seems particularly intriguing),
which suggests a certain degree of intermixing of characters
possibly through hybridisation or owing to high variability
in some populations of torquatus , a score of 8-9 takes
nominate Gampsorhychus r. rufulus to species level (leaving
other forms of torquatus to cluster under the suggested
English name Collared Babbler).
In Gampsorhychus rufulus immature birds have a
foxy-rufous crown to nape, shading yellower on the face
and neck-sides, but this feature appears to be only
very briefly if ever shown in G. torquatus and its races,
suggesting a possible taxonomic feature. Meyer de
Schauensee ( 1 934) reported on a newly fledged torquatus
in which ‘the top of the head is orange fulvous mixed with
white on the forehead’, but this is the only evidence I can
find of torquatus showing this coloration, and even in this
case it was confined to a small area of the crown rather
than, as in rufulus , affecting the entire head. USNM
350126 from Doi Pu Het, Thailand, 13 June 1935, is
labelled as a moulting juvenile but shows no sign of rufous
on the head. Table 4 shows this striking disparity, with
25% of all rufulus and 0% of all torquatus showing rufous
crowns.
Alcippe (castaneceps) klossi
Photographs in Collar (2003) indicated the candidacy of
this split. Even with the recent addition of race stepanyani
(Eames 2002), subspecific variation in Rufous-winged
Fulvetta A. castaneceps is slight except on the Da Lat
Plateau of southern Vietnam, where klossi occurs. This
form differs from all other subspecies of castaneceps by its
sooty-black rather than dark chestnut crown (2), off-white,
much broader streaking on the crown and much less
pronounced white supercilium (2), dull ochre-brown
primary panel vs bold whitish and strong orangey-rufous
or chestnut primary panel (2), broad olive-rufescent fringes
to blackish-brown greater coverts, resulting in far less
visible black on greater coverts (1), paler (notably on the
lower mandible) and longer bill (2) and rather longer tail
(1) (Tables 1-2). Robson (2000) further noted that the
irides of klossi are grey-brown as against deep crimson in
remaining castaneceps , although a specimen of the former
in USNM is labelled as having ‘clay-red’ eyes (no score).
This score of 10 lifts klossi (Black-crowned Fulvetta) to
species level. It is perhaps worth remarking in this regard
that Robinson and Kloss (1919), who first described klossi
(under the name atriceps ), gave it full species status even
while describing other highly distinctive taxa, including
two — Garrulax (merulinus) annamensis and Cutia
(nipalensis) legalleni — here raised to species level, as
subspecies.
Alcippe (nificapilla) danisi-f
Spectacled Fulvetta Alcippe nificapilla is divided into two
northern (Chinese) taxa, nominate nificapilla and sordidior,
and two southern ones, danisi (Laos) and bidoupensis
(Vietnam). Eames etal. (1994) reviewed the characters of
their new bidoupensis when allying it with ruficapilla , and
in doing so remarked: ‘it is arguable that bidoupensis and
danisi arc sufficiently distinct from ruficapilla and sordidior
to be lumped together as a separate species, or as two
separate species in their own right, since they are arguably
allospecies within a superspecies’. Later, however, under
A. ruficapilla in Inskipp et al. (1996), C. R. Robson
commented: ‘The forms danisi and bidoupensis are very
distinct morphometrically and initial analysis of calls
(of bidoupensis... with A. r. sordidior ) shows a marked
difference. The two forms merit specific rank in A. danisi
Indochinese Fulvetta. ’In making this split, Robson (2000)
offered no further explanation. Dickinson (2000) declined
to follow him, since ‘detailed argument remains to be
published’.
Eames et al. (1994) examined in detail the records of
the taxa in ruficapilla and cast doubt on the re-allocation
of certain records of sordidior in southern China to danisi.
They thereby maintained danisi as a Laos endemic, and
provided tabulations of the characters distinguishing the
four forms in question. From these tabulations the
following scoring results: crown of danisi and bidoupensis
greyish-brown rather than rufescent-brown (score 2);
throat whitish with brown streaks with breast pale vinous-
brown, rather than throat and breast whitish with light
greyish streaks (2); ear-coverts lightly streaked vs plain
( 1 ) , postocular supercilium buffy-whitish vs pale grey ( 1 );
outer primaries fringed warm brown vs pale grey (such
that the effect of a prominent blackish-and-whitish wing-
panel is lost, or almost so) (1); bill seemingly slightly
darker brown (no score). These differences are apparent
in material at AMNH and BMNH, neither of which,
however, holds danisi , so that information on this form is
taken on trust from Eames etal. ( 1 994), where it is indicated
that the differences between danisi and bidoupensis are
small — browner crown and no (rather than a highly
reduced) wing-flash in the latter (Robson 2000). Thus, a
score of 7 takes danisil bidoupensis just over the threshold
for species status, irrespective of whether there are vocal
differences from ruficapilla as suggested in Inskipp et al.
(1996), while the differences between these two taxa
amount to no more than a score of 2, and maintain them
as a single polytypic species.
Discovery of populations showing intermediate
plumage between sordidior and danisi seems possible,
104
N. J. COT T AR
Forktail 22 (2006)
in which case the new arrangement would collapse
back into the old. It should also be noted (1) that the
illustration of danisi in Robson (2000) poorly reflects the
appearance of bidoupensis in BMNH skins and in
photographs inEameseru/. (1994); and (2) that the claim
in Inskipp et al. (1996) — that ‘ danisi and bidoupensis are
very distinct morphometrically [i.e. from the other two
taxa] ' — is not borne out by the tabulation in Eames et al.
(1994), which gives (wing) 50.5-58 mm ( ruficapilla ),
51-58 mm ( sordidior ), 57 mm ( danisi ) and 56-62 mm
{bidoupensis), and (tarsus) 20.5-22 ( ruficapilla ), 20-
21 mm {sordidior), 22 mm {danisi) and 22-25 mm
{bidoupensis) . There is a tendency to larger size in danisi
and bidoupensis, but on this evidence it is not 100%
diagnostic.
Alcippe (cinereiceps) manipurensis $
Alcippe (cinereiceps) formosana
‘Species limits probably best restricted to include only
manipurensis and tonkinensis, based on morphology and
vocalisations’ (Rasmussen and Anderton 2005).
Streak-throated Fulvetta A. cinereiceps, as commonly
constituted, is somewhat problematic. The taxa
manipurensis (north-east India south of the Brahmaputra,
northern Myanmar and western Yunnan) and tonkinensis
(south-east Yunnan, western N Tonkin in Vietnam)
certainly share several features that set them apart from
other forms of cinereiceps (although there are no obvious
morphometric distinctions) : they have far stronger throat-
streaks (2) and lateral crown-stripes (2), marginally darker
breasts (no score), much stronger rust-coloured lower
belly and flanks and edges to the inner primaries (2).
Unfortunately, Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) did not
supply evidence of the different vocalisations to which
they referred, but such evidence is taken on trust here,
since even a minor difference (1) achieves the necessary
score. Alcippe manipurensis takes with it the English name
Streak-throated Fulvetta, with Grey-hooded Fulvetta for
the diminished A. cinereiceps.
The form on T aiwan , formosana, was not marked down
by Collar (2004b) as a particularly likely split, but reference
was made to its being ‘closest plumage-wise to races
manipurensis and tonkinensis than... to adjacent mainland
guttaticollis . . .’ and of all taxa in cinereiceps ‘having much
the most clearly marked and extensive throat-streaks of
all, and much the strongest and most extensive rufous
wing-panel’. With manipurensis and tonkinensis now split
off, the question indeed arises whether formosana belongs
with them or should stand alone. Against the remaining
taxa in cinereiceps (nominate cinereiceps, fucata, fessa and
guttaticollis) it scores for pink-tinged greyish (not black)
bill (1), black lores (2), white eye-ring (2), streaked ear-
coverts (1), light brown lateral crown-stripes (1), mouse-
brown crown (1), strongly brown-streaked whitish breast
(2), and strong rusty-tan wing-panel (2), total 13. Against
manipurensis and tonkinensis it scores for pinkish-tinged
(not black) bill, appearing yellowish in skins (1), black
lores (2), white eye-ring (2), more extensive breast¬
streaking ( 1 ) , weaker lateral crown-stripes ( 1 ) , more olive
(weaker rusty) lower belly and flanks (1), and stronger
rusty-tan wing-panel (1), total 9. Without reference to
vocalisations , formosana emerges as a full species (Taiwan
Fulvetta) in this analysis. One specimen of formosana in
BMNH (1913.1.29.27) possesses a bold flash of pure
white on the forehead.
Alcippe (peracensis) grotei\
Under Mountain Fulvetta A. peracensis, Inskipp et al.
(1996) provided a brief history of the taxonomic confusion
associated with peracensis and its group, with the
concluding observation:
C. R. Robson (pers. comm. 1995) suggests that A
p. grotei is more closely related to [A.] poiocephala
[sic. Brown-cheeked Fulvetta] than to other
subspecies of peracensis. It is sympatric in Vietnam
with A p[eracensis] annamensis in several places and
differs in morphology and vocalisations (see also
Thewlis et al. 1996 for Laos) and it therefore
warrants treatment as a separate species.
Robson (2000) duly so treated it (with race eremita, under
the name Black-browed Fulvetta), repeating the case:
‘separated here [from peracensis ] due to widespread
sympatry and markedly different biometrics, morphology
and voice’. Dickinson (2003), although purporting to
follow Inskipp etal. ( 1 996) in his treatment of grotei , placed
it in poioicephala and remarked of Robson (2000): ‘His
detailed findings, which are important, require publication
and will then deserve following.’
The situation ought to be relatively simple to resolve.
In Vietnam Robson et al. (1993) found grotei and
annamensis together in Bach Ma National Park, the former
below 700 m, the latter above 900 m. In Laos Thewlis et
al. (1996) found birds they ascribed to these two taxa in
some form of sympatry or elevational allopatry or parapatry
in at least two ‘National Biodiversity Conservation Areas’:
at Dong Hua Sao grotei was ‘common... up to 400 m, but
not above’ (presumably the ‘not above’ refers to range,
not to abundance), while annamensis was ‘very common
at 900-1,200 m’, and at Phou Xang He it was ‘seen at
least twice... at only 200 m..., in areas similar to those
where [grotei] was common’. This last observation suggests
straightforward sympatry, while the other evidence
suggests one form replacing the other altitudinally in
several places: either way, this is clearly enough to indicate
that two species are involved.
However, Robson<?ru/. (1993) failed to clarify whether
grotei should be reassigned from peracensis to poioicephala
or given independent status. They noted that ‘its
biometrics, song and altitudinal range place it much closer
to... poiocephala [szc] ’ although morphologically distinct
from both peracensis and poioicephala. They added that
‘further research is currently underway and it is hoped
that a paper will be published on the status of A. p. grotei
in the near future.’ Nothing has appeared, and Dickinson’s
(2003) placement of grotei with poioicephala and
encouragement of the promised paper is understandable.
Tables 1-2 confirm the assertion that grotei clearly
distinct from peracensis and annamensis in its decidedly
shorter tail, and that in biometrics it is very close, albeit
not identical , to poioicephala (race haringtoniae) . Compared
to haringtoniae, the coronal bands are blacker ( 1 ), the face
is predominantly grey rather than pale brownish (1), the
chin to belly are pearly white rather than continuous buff
(2) , with pale greyish-brown flanks ( 1 ) , the slightly stronger
grey crown contrasts more with (and is more sharply
demarcated from) the slightly richer, darker, more rufescent
upperparts ( 1 ) , the inner fringes of the tertials, secondaries
and primaries are whiter ( 1 ), and the song usually rises less
at the end (C. R. Robson in litt. 2006) — indeed, P. D.
Round {in litt. 2006) notes: ‘song markedly different from
poioicephala ’ (2). No other subspecies of poioicephala
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
105
displays characters that allow a lower score to be tallied,
and on this basis the specific separation of grotei is upheld.
Heterophasia (melanoleuca) desgodinsi f
Under Dark-backed Sibia H. melanoleuca Inskipp et al.
(1996) mentioned that Smythies (1949) had described
‘significant vocal differences’ between melanoleuca and
desgodinsi , and remarked that ‘they are as different
morphologically as are other species in the genus’.
Moreover, ‘C. R. Robson (pers. comm. 1996) played the
song of H. d. robinsoni to an individual of melanoleuca in
north-west Thailand and found no response, although the
bird reacted to its own song. A sample involving several
tapes and several birds is necessary to assess the significance
of this. ’ This last proviso notwithstanding, Robson (2000)
split desgodinsi (under the name Black-headed Sibia)
without comment. Dickinson (2003) observed that the
desgodinsi group ‘may well be a separate species’ but
‘detailed substantiation is needed’.
The desgodinsi group ( desgodinsi , engelbachi , robinsoni ,
tonkinensis and kingi; hereafter desgodinsi) is clearly distinct
from the melanoleuca group ( melanoleuca , castanoptera and
radcliffei; hereafter melanoleuca ) . In desgodinsi the crown is
sharply delineated from the mantle, whereas in melanoleuca
the two run together (2); in desgodinsi the mantle, back
and scapulars are distinctly paler than the crown, wings
and tail, in shading between relatively pure grey and duller,
rufous-stained grey, whereas in melanoleuca these parts of
the body are various shades of very dark rufous-brown
(2); in desgodinsi the breast and flanks are suffused with
pale grey, emphasising the clear white of the throat and
belly, whereas in melanoleuca the underparts are a hard
white with a very slight buff discoloration (2); in desgodinsi
the mterramal (uppermost chin) feathering is usually
white, in melanoleuca usually black (no score) ; in desgodinsi
the tail-tips are greyish-white and broad, notably on the
central feathers, whereas in melanoleuca they are whitish
and narrow (2). A total score of 8 does not convey the
strength of the visual difference that an examination of
specimen material conveys, but it is enough.
However, it is worth returning to the notes on the
songs of melanoleuca and desgodinsi provided by Smythies
(1949, 1986). That of melanoleuca is ‘about five notes in
a minor key. . . [starting] with a very short trill, which runs
into three quick notes on the same pitch and ends with
two longer notes dropping in pitch, the last note prolonged
and very mournful’. That of desgodinsi is ‘a melodious
phrase of 5-7 notes of unequal interval rising in pitch,
sometimes followed by a lower note’ . Smythies was familiar
with at least the song of melanoleuca from several parts of
Myanmar, without remarking on any variation in it, and
he explicitly records that when he first heard desgodinsi he
recognised it as a sibia but of an unfamiliar species. These
descriptions can fairly be viewed therefore as indicating
entirely different songs (score 3; total then 1 1), and it is
worth noting that Smythies heard melanoleuca as far north
as Mogok in central Myanmar, less than 400 km from
‘Laukkaung’ (Launggyaung) in north-east Myanmar,
where he heard desgodinsi.
Yuhina (castaniceps) torqueola
Yuhina (castaniceps) everetti D
Striated Yuhina Y. castaniceps breaks up into several well-
marked subspecies, of which the most prominent are the
two far eastern taxa, torqueola of Indochina and everetti on
Borneo. All members of the species sensu lato are plain
whitish below and rather pale olive-brown above with
darker white-tipped tail, rufous-tan ear-coverts, and
variously patterned crown.
Considering these taxa from west to east, Y. c. rufigenis
(Eastern Himalayas; all ranges simplified from Dickinson
2003) is characterised by whitish-speckled supercilium
bordered above by rufous-tan, rufous-tan ear-coverts and
contiguous moustachial area, dark-speckled whitish
submoustachial area, (brownish-)grey crown with pale
shaft-streaks, indistinct pale shaft-streaks on the
upperparts, and slight buffy staining to the undersides,
especially on the flanks. Race plumbeiceps (eastern Assam
through northern Myanmar to western Yunnan) differs
in being a shade greyer, darker and duller on crown and
upperparts with marginally more pronounced shaft-
streaks, and cleaner white underparts which extend to the
submoustachial area. Nominate castaniceps (southern
Assam, western Myanmar) resembles rufigenis but has a
creamier supercilium and rufous-tan crown and nape
scaled frontally broad grey-buff, and slightly fainter shaft¬
streaking above. Race striata (eastern Myanmar, northern
Thailand) resembles rufigenis but the crown is duller,
darker and browner with a narrow broken whitish
supercilium (no rufous-tan above), ear-coverts paler and
duller but with whitish shaft-streaking, underparts cleaner,
upperparts with stronger shaft-streaking. All these taxa
thus have a fair degree of distinctiveness.
However, the form torqueola (central Y unnan to eastern
China, eastern north-west Thailand, Indochina;
‘Indochinese Yuhina’) is more distinct still. It has a greyish
crown and narrow grey-flecked white supercilium, rich
chestnut-rufous ear-coverts with bold white streaks
extending round the nape in a broad, paler (rufous)
chestnut collar. There are various ways one might score
this remarkable feature, but I allow it 3 for pattern (the
striking breadth of the collar) and 2 for its far greater
intensity of background coloration and 1 for its bold white
streaking (hence 6). It is also a longer-winged and longer-
tailed bird than all other taxa except everetti (score 1 ; T ables
1-2), and its call, as documented by Robson (2000),
appears to be considerably different from at least other
continental taxa (2) ; from everetti it further differs in its
crown coloration (2).
In the absence ofvocal data, the case of the easternmost
form everetti (northern Borneo) is rather less tractable.
Inskipp et al. (1996) followed Smythies (1981) and
Smythies and Davison ( 1 999) — albeit neither of the latter
carried a justification for this move — in accepting specific
status for ‘Chestnut-crested Yuhina’, but Dickinson
(2003), while describing the ‘Chestnut-capped Yuhina’
as ‘very distinct’, kept it lumped. Indeed, everetti rather
closely resembles nominate castaniceps , but its crown is
richer rufous-tan, lacks the buffy-grey frontal scaling
(although the crown feathers may have slightly darker
edges, giving a vague scaled effect at very close range) , and
more fully feathered ear-coverts without pale shaft-streaks
(score 3); its lores are (greyish- or buffy-)white (1); its
upperparts virtually lack shaft-streaking and are a shade
darker (1); its underparts are bolder white, without the
vague buffy staining and buffy-grey flanks of castaniceps ,
giving more emphasis to the dusky (brownish-grey) tarsal
feathering (1); and its size, like that of torqueola (from
which it is mensurally indistinguishable) is marginally
greater (1; Tables 1-2). This thus achieves a score of 7,
106
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
but even so the differences, other than the crown, are very
minor and debatable. Of course when everettiis compared
with the geographically nearest taxon ( torqueola ) or indeed
any other subspecies, its score increases beyond the
required threshold, but in cases of polytypic species any
attempts to split ought to involve comparison with the
morphologically closest subspecies, with no allowance for
degree of disjunction. Nevertheless, where the
morphologically closest subspecies is separated
geographically by one or more other taxa in the subspecies,
there is a case for adding a point, which would be
conveniently reassuring in this case.
Yuhina (flavicollis) humilis D
Inskipp et al. (1996), the baseline taxonomy used here,
recognised humilis (Burmese Y uhina) as a separate species,
following King etal. (1975),Smythies (1986) andLekagul
and Round (1991), and followed by Robson (2000).
However, Dickinson (2003) reunited it with Whiskered
Yuhina Y. flavicollis , remarking that its separation ‘may
well be correct, but a thorough study remains to be done’.
The morphometries and colour patterns of the two
taxa appear identical; the differences he simply in
coloration. The forms humilis and clarki differ from other
taxa commonly treated in flavicollis by their browner crown
and ear-coverts (1) (in the case of nominate humilis the
crown is barely a shade darker than the upperparts), soft
mid-grey vs rufous and golden-yellow hind-collar and
neck-sides (2), (brownish-) grey (vs olive grey-brown)
upperparts (1), streaking (albeit very light) on chin and
throat (1), and white-centred grey (vs dull buffy olive-
brown) flank feathers (2). Evidence of any behavioural
(especially vocal) divergence would be helpful, but species
status is just achieved with a score of 7.
Paradoxomis (gularis) margaritae
Photographs in Collar (2003) indicated the candidacy of
the split of margaritae from Grey-headed Parrotbill P.
gularis. The former, from the Da Lat Plateau in South
Annam, Vietnam (with a recent sight record from
Mondulkiri, Cambodia: C. R. Robson verbally 2006),
differs markedly from other subspecies in gularis by its jet-
black crown (3), dark-mottled ear-coverts (2), slightly
richer rufous back (1) and slightly shorter tail (1; Tables
1-2). If the race rasus from Chin Hills, Myanmar, which
also lacks the black throat and is ‘smaller’ (Robson 2000),
is discounted, the stippled (not solid black) throat (2) of
margaritae , which in combination with the all-black crown
gives a very different appearance to that of gularis, entirely
settles the issue. The name Black-headed Parrotbill seems
most appropriate.
The status of Stachyris rodolphei
The history of ‘Deignan’s Babbler’ Stachyris rodolphei is
very largely written by Deignan himself, but it is
unsatisfactorily elliptical. Deignan (1939) established
the name rodolphei on the basis of three specimens of
Stachyris from Doi Chiang Dao in north-west Thailand,
claiming that
they cannot be considered representatives of any
known species. From ruficeps they differ in the
absence of yellows in the plumage; from rufifrons in
having gray lores and throat; from poliogaster in the
absence of gray from the belly; from pyrrltops in
having no black on the throat. Moreover, a form of
rufifrons occurs within 50, if not 25, miles of Doi
Chiengdao, and there is even some reason to believe
that both rufifrons and ruficeps occur on Chiengdao
itself.
This is immediately puzzling, because it is by no means
clear (a) that one, other or both rufifrons and ruficeps are
sympatric with the taxon in question on Doi Chieng Dao,
and (b), if allopatry is instead the circumstance, that the
differences Deignan mentions are sufficiently strong to
warrant species status. Zimmer and Mayr (1943), in
reducing rodolphei to a subspecies of 5. ruficeps, commented
that
The babblers of the ruficeps-davidi group are still
insufficiently understood and this is the reason why
rodolphei was described as a full species. There are
apparently two species involved, the ranges of which
overlap in Indochina and on the Burma-Yunnan
frontier, a situation comparable to that of Alcippe
nipalensis and morrisoniana. It seems as if praecogmta,
bhamoensis, bangsi, goodsoni and davidi belong to
the species davidi, and all the other forms, including
rodolphei, to ruficeps.
Soon afterwards, Deignan (1945) declared himself ‘now
of the opinion that Stachyris rodolphei may properly be
considered a mere subspecies of the rufifrons group’, but
he gave no reason for this. Moreover, he insisted that he
had collected 5. rufifrons insuspecta — also first described
in Deignan ( 1 939) — also on Doi Chiang Dao but in 1 93 1 ,
and in shuffling rodolphei down to a race of rufifrons he was
obliged to re-allocate insuspecta to Y. ruficeps. Even so, he
admitted that his identification of his insuspecta at that site
was based on ‘one mutilated specimen’, whose
preservation seems in doubt, since he referred to it in the
past tense:
I now have no doubt that this example belonged to
the race later named insuspecta, and since de
Schauensee took Y. rufifrons rodolphei in the
grasslands at 5,500 feet, I find it impossible to agree
with Mayr in his view that the forms of rufifrons and
those of ruficeps are conspecific.
How Deignan could be confident of the identification of
a poorly marked subspecies, whose ‘fragments’ he had
not seen for many (perhaps 1 3) years, is a further puzzle.
In any case, eighteen years later Deignan (1963, 1964)
changed his position yet again, yet again without
explanation, re-establishing rodolphei as a full species and
dropping both ruficeps and insuspecta from the Thailand
avifauna, replacing the latter two with the combination Y.
ambigua adjuncta ( adjuncta being the third taxon he had
described in his 1939 paper). Subsequently Y. rodolphei
was recognised by Lekagul (1968), King et al. (1975),
Sibley and Monroe (1990), Lekagul and Round (1991)
and Clements (2000), but not by Robson (2000), who
regarded rodolphei as a synonym of rufifrons, and only
reluctantly by Dickinson (2003), who thought it unlikely
to be valid, possibly an aberrant and in need of study.
C. R. Robson (in litt. 2006) reports that there have
been repeated records of rufifrons from Doi Chiang Dao,
one of them by P. D. Round and U. Treesucon in 1987,
who caught and photographed a bird, and who in other
searches have never encountered birds they could
discriminate as rodolphei ( P. D. Round in litt. 2006); Robson
himself has been on the mountain in search of rodolphei,
and only ever found rufifrons, and he cannot see what
habitat there is ( Stachyris being in any case rather catholic
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
107
in choice) which could be occupied by a second, very
similar species. Deignan’s (1939) original description
(above) indicates that the difference between rodolphei
and rufifrons is very slight, the former ‘having gray lores
and throat’. Examination of USNM 336890 and 33689 1
(type), both taken in March (Plate 9), suggests that
rodolphei possesses somewhat deeper grey lores and
supercilium, deeper olive-grey ear-coverts, and possibly
greyer throat than in most rufifrons, but these differences
are small, and in BMNH there are specimens of rufifrons
that appear to match rodolphei on one or more of these
characters. My measurements of a sample of BMNH
rufifrons and the two USNM rodolphei show that the latter
have rather longer wings (Tables 1-2), but this may be
local variation. My inclination is therefore to concur with
Robson (2000) that rodolphei is for the moment better
placed in synonymy with rufifrons, although a proper survey
of Doi Chiang Dao would be important to lay the matter
finally to rest, and visiting birdwatchers should certainly
remain alert to the possibility, however remote, that
rodolphei might yet prove to be valid.
Meanwhile, there remains a great deal of uncertainty
about birds in the ‘ rufifrons ’ complex, especially in Thailand
and Indochina. Even 5. ruficeps and S', rufifrons, which
appear to separate elevationally and seem never to have
been recorded sympatrically, are so slight in their plumage
differences (and are vocally so difficult to discriminate)
that they may well deserve to be treated as conspecific
(they certainly would not pass the test used here for species-
level decisions on allopatric taxa) . A considerable amount
of detailed research, and the comparison of a great deal
of museum material, will, however, be necessary in order
to draw a robust conclusion on the matter, and in the
absence of such work I opt for preserving the status quo.
The generic placement of Philippine Napothera
In recent lists (Sibley and Monroe 1 990, Clements 2000,
Dickinson 2003) the genus Napothera has consisted of
nine species, arranged (with ranges) as follows (species
same but sequence different in Inskipp et al. 1996):
Eyebrowed Wren Babbler Napothera epilepidota
(Bhutan to Borneo)
Streaked Wren Babbler Napothera brevicaudata
(Assam to Malay Peninsula)
Mountain Wren Babbler Napothera crassa (Borneo)
Limestone Wren Babbler Napothera crispifrons
(Yunnan to S Myanmar)
Rusty-breasted Wren Babbler Napothera rufipectus
(Sumatra)
Black-throated Wren Babbler Napothera atrigularis
(Borneo)
Large Wren Babbler Napothera macrodactyla (Malay
Peninsula to Java)
Marbled Wren Babbler Napothera marmorata
(Malay Peninsula to Sumatra)
Rabor’s Wren Babbler Napothera rabori (Luzon)
However, these taxa are unusually disparate in size,
structure, plumage pattern and coloration for congeneric
treatment. The three first-listed are small, shortish-tailed
birds, scaled and streaked above in pale and dark brown.
The fourth, crispifrons, is a mid-sized, longish-tailed bird
with grey and white dress. The five last-listed are all rather
large, heavy-billed babblers with mid-length tails and
different-patterned brown, blackish, grey, white, buff and
often rufous feathering. In his relatively neglected
assessment, Wolters (1975-1982) saw fit to divide them
up into four genera in the following sequence:
Limestone Wren Babbler Gypsophila crispifrons
Marbled Wren Babbler Cacopitta marmorata
Rusty-breasted Wren Babbler Turdinus rufipectus
Black-throated Wren Babbler T. atrigularis
Large Wren Babbler T. macrodactylus
Streaked Wren Babbler Napothera brevicaudata
Mountain Wren Babbler N. crassa
Rabor’s Wren Babbler N. rabori
Eyebrowed Wren Babbler N. epilepidota
This seems closer to expressing the considerable
differences between these taxa, even if they are all more
closely related to each other than to other genera. Certainly
the three Turdinus belong together on the basis of their
size and upperpart pattern, and the three Napothera (minus
rabori, which presumably Wolters never saw a skin of, and
which for simplicity in this discussion includes
sorsogonensis, split above) do likewise on the same basis.
It is also understandable why Wolters thought to place
the other two, which are relatively distinctive, in their
own genera. The case for Cacopitta is probably superficial
(see below) j but where he seems to have been most
mistaken was in placing rabori in his restricted Napothera.
Rand (1960) thought that rabori stands between and
connects marmorata and macrodactyla on the one side and
crispifrons, brevicaudata and epilepidota on the other,
‘combining the characters of each’. However, the very
first feature he gave in the description of the type is ‘No
rictal bristles’, which are possessed by all the other species
under review. Moreover, the nares are at least partly
covered with bristly feathering, and this condition, too, is
absent in the other taxa. The rather elongate and densely
fluffy feathering on the sides of rump and lower flanks, a
feature of several babblers, is particularly copious in rabori,
much more so than in any other species in Napothera sensu
lato, and in study skins it actually forms a large flap between
the folded wing and the flanks. It is difficult to be sure, but
the tibia of rabori appear notably long, perhaps as long as
the tarsus (they appear so in RMNH 99810, which is,
surprisingly for a 1982 specimen, mounted: Plate 6), and
certainly proportionately longer than in other Napothera
sensu lato (possibly the copious rump feathering is related
in some way to this elongation). The white spotting on
the wing-coverts is very bold and quite different from the
much smaller spots on the wings of the only other species
in the genus that show them ( epilepidota and brevicaudata),
and uniquely rabori has white tips to the two outer
primaries.
Apart from these morphological distinctions, the salient
differences of rabori from other members of Napothera
sensu lato lie in its behaviour. Where all the others hop and
maintain the tail in line with the body, rabori walks and
runs, and cocks its tail to various angles (de Roever 1 990,
Harrap and Mitchell 1994, C. R. Robson verbally 2006).
Where the others have either structured songs ( marmorata ,
rufipectus, atrigularis and macrodactylus ) or simple whistles
( brevicaudata and epilepidota', crassa may have a song) or
chattering chorus ( crispifrons ), rabori has a high-pitched
thin call, totally unlike the call of any other babbler except
Bagobo Babbler Leonardina woodi, another Philippine
endemic (C. R. Robson verbally 2006). Harrap and
Mitchell (1994), who first reported this call in rabori,
judged that in terms of this vocalisation and general jizz
rabori ‘does not resemble the other members of the genus
108
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
Napothera’ and thought that its placement in a genus of
its own might be appropriate. I concur.
My inclination is to group the four large Sundaic
babblers in Turdinus (including the rather long-tailed
Cacopitta, which is similar in size and certain plumage
features to the others, and fide C. R. Robson in song to
macro dactylus) . The three small babblers merit their
placement in the restricted Napothera , although crassa is
somewhat anomalous owing to its curiously broad,
rounded head and lack of wing-spotting. The
intermediate-sized crispifrons shares some characters with
both the preceding, but owing to its habitat choice and
vocalisations seems better separated in Gypsophila.
Meanwhile rabori, which is of course still more anomalous
for its outlying geographical position, requires recognition
of its distinctiveness through the establishment of
Robsonius , new genus,
diagnosed by a combination of features that include:
absence of rictal bristles; part-feathered nares; broad white
tips to wing-coverts and outer 2-3 primaries; very copious,
dense, elongate rump feathering; fairly long and slightly
hooked bill, as in Turdinus ; high-pitched, insect-like main
vocalisation; and walking habit. Material examined:
AMNH 807095, BMNH 1977.16.65-66, CM 151227
and 153961, RMNH 99810, USNM 607458, 608086.
Type species: Napothera rabori Rand, 1960.
Moreover, it is by no means clear that Robsonius is in
fact a ‘wren babbler’, and its removal from this group of
birds, perhaps to alongside Leonardina — although
specimens of which show some rictal bristles and little
nasal feathering (G. K. Hess in litt. 2006) — is in order.
Alternative English names which express diagnostic
features of two members the new genus would be ‘Rusty¬
faced Babbler’ forN. rabori sensu stricto and ‘Grey-banded
Babbler’ for N. sorsogonensis (with its subspecies
mesoluzonica) . The name Robsonius pays tribute to the
expertise and contribution of Craig R. Robson with respect
to the study of Asian birds and -as this paper amply
demonstrates — Asian babblers in particular.
COMMENTARY
The great majority of taxa reviewed here pass the species-
level test outlined in the introduction: no fewer than 44
taxa can be elevated to species on the basis of their degree
of difference from other taxa, as assessed on both strength
and number of diagnostic characters. This represents only
two-thirds of the 67 splits that Collar (2003) suggested
might be appropriate to bring the Asian babblers into line
with the taxonomic treatment of Neotropical antbirds;
but this exercise does not claim to be comprehensive, and
further separations among the babblers may well be
warranted, especially when the vocalisations of more taxa
have been recorded and become available for analysis (the
taxa that currently compose Streaked Wren Babbler
Napothera brevicaudata, for example, are subtly but
intriguingly divergent in size and underpart patterning,
and a review of the vocal evidence would be extremely
helpful). However, one upshot of this scoring system is
that vocal differences need not be apparent between taxa
for species status to be bestowed on them, if the
morphological characters are strong enough.
Whether the scoring system itself is to some degree
accurate and helpful is another matter. Since I am part of
the team that developed it, it is unsurprising that it
produces results that fairly well match my intuitive sense
of what constitutes a specific rather than a subspecific
difference. Others will doubtless form different
conclusions; using the phylogenetic species concept, for
example, Reddy (2005) drew far narrower species limits
in Garrulax erythrocephalus and Pomatorhinus ruficollis , and
similar results to hers would probably result by applying
the BOU criteria in Helbigt?ra/. (2002). It is certainly true
that the system is easiest to apply in simple cases where
only two taxa are being compared, and becomes
progressively less straightforward with increasing number
of taxa and taxonomic groupings within established
species, as with G. erythrocephalus , P. ruficollis and P.
erythrocnemis.
In terms of points scored, the most distinctive split
might be that of Sphenocichla roberti (12-15), in part
because the vocal evidence was available, followed by
Garrulax gularis (13+), Heterophasia desgodinsi (11),
Napothera (now Robsonius ) sorsogonensis, Spelaeornis
badeigularis, Macronous bomensis and Alcippe klossi (10),
G. imbricatus, G. melanostigma, G. peninsulae, Stachyris
pygmaea, A. formosana, A. grotei and Yuhina torqueola (9),
G. berthemyi (8-10), Micromacronus sordidus and
Gampsorhynchus torquatus (8-9), G. annamensis and
Pomatorhinus musicus (8+), G. ruficeps, G. courtoisi, G.
taewanus, Spelaeornis oatesi, Cutia legalleni (8), Rimator
albostriatus and Paradoxornis margaritae (7-9), G.
ngoclinhensis and A. kinneari (7—8), and finally G. bicolor,
G. calvus, G. ferrarius, G. castanotis, G. chrysopterus,
Pomatorhinus gravivox, P. mcclellandi, P. swinhoei, P.
melanurus, R. pasquieri, Pnoepyga formosana, S. reptatus,
A. danisi, A. manipurensis, Y. evereiu and Y. humilis (7).
These last 16 are patently the most debatable splits, and
the ones for which new evidence is most likely to result in
further shifts and assortments in species limits, and the
possibility of re-amalgamations cannot be excluded.
The species resulting from this revision clearly require
assessment for their conservation status. Many are
‘restricted-range’ birds in the BirdLife International sense
(confined to Endemic Bird Areas or EB As : see Stattersfield
et al. 1998). Taiwan gains seven new endemic species,
Garrulax ruficeps, G. poecilorhynchus, G. taewanus,
Pomatorhinus erythrocnemis, P. musicus, Pnoepyga formosana
and Alcippe formosana, all confined to the Taiwan EBA.
Mainland China gains five species. Vietnam ‘gains’
(inverted commas because at least two in the list had
already been elevated elsewhere) six new endemic species,
Garrulax annamensis, G. ngoclinhensis, Rimator pasquieri,
Spelaeornis kinneari, Cutia legalleni and Alcippe klossi, the
first and last of which are restricted to the Da Lat plateau
EBA in south Annam (. Alcippe grotei and Paradoxornis
margaritae range into Laos). The mountains of south¬
west Cambodia host Garrulax ferrarius, turning the
Thailand-Cambodia mountains Secondary Area into an
EBA. Sumatra gains two endemic birds, Garrulax bicolor
and Rimator albostriatus, both of which bolster the
complement of the Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia
EBA, as does the Peninsula’s Garrulax peninsulae. In the
Philippines the two splits of taxa straddling Leyte and
Samar on one side and Mindanao on the other result in
no change to the existing EBA, but the importance of the
biogeographical break between the two sets of islands is
reinforced; the split of Robsonius sorsogonensis adds one
species to the Luzon EBA. The Eastern Himalayas EBA
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
109
‘gains’ two species, Spelaeomis chocolatinus and A. oatesi,
from the three-way split of 5. chocolatinus sensu lato, and
Sphenocichla humei now becomes endemic to this EBA.
Pomatorhinus melanurus adds one to the list of Sri Lankan
endemics and to the Sri Lanka EBA. Myanmar also gains
one species.
It is evident that the majority of these 44 ‘new’ species
remain of low conservation priority or concern. However,
Plate 2. Adult Napothera (rabori) rabori, Barangay Reina Mercedes,
Maconacon, Isabela, Luzon, April 1997. Photo: F. Danielsen.
Plate 3. Female adult Napothera (rabori) rabori, Palanan, Luzon, March
1991. Watercolour painting by M. K. Poulsen. Photo: F. Danielsen.
Plate 4. Adult Napothera (rabori) rabori , Barangay Villa Aurora, San
Luis, Aurora, Luzon, May 1997 (CMNH 37710). Photo: J. Ferner.
the taxa confined to south Annam — Garrulax annamensis ,
Cutia legalleni and Alcippe klossi — are likely to be at elevated
risk, as perhaps is Paradoxornis margaritae and the
Cambodian endemic G.fenarius. Rimator alboslriatus seems
very rare on its native Sumatra (I was only able to find four
specimens), Spelaeomis chocolatinus , reptatus and oatesi all
have very restricted ranges, and the status of the two Eastern
Visayas endemics in the Philippines, Stachyris pygmaea
Plate 5. Lateral view of Napothera (rabori) mesoluzonica (AMNH
807095). Photo: N. J. Collar.
Plate 6. Mounted specimen of Napothera ( rabori) mesoluzonica (RMNH
99810). Photo: N. J. Collar.
Plate 7. Ventral view of Napothera (rabori) mesoluzonica (AMNH
807095). Photo: N. J. Collar.
110
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
Plate 8. Ventral view of the type (female; lower) of Spelaeomis
badeigularis (USNM 390335) and an unsexed specimen (upper) of 5.
caudatus (USNM 335178). Photo: N. J. Collar.
Plate 9. Lateral view of two of three known specimens of Stachyris
rodolphei (USNM 336890 and 336891 [type]). Photo: N. J. Collar.
and Micromacronus leytensis, requires urgent review. On
Taiwan Garrulax ruficeps appears to be relatively
uncommon, or at least very limited in distribution; but the
commoner G. taewanus may be more at risk, since it faces
a degree of genetic swamping from G. canorus, which is
imported into Taiwan as a cagebird because of its singing
capability, and which escapes regularly (L. L. Severinghaus
verbally 2003).
Perhaps the most worrying species are Garrulax courtoisi
and G. bicolor. Considerable anxiety and conservation
effort now attend the main population of courtoisi , which
numbers fewer than 200 individuals in a tiny area of Jiangxi
province in eastern China (Hong et al. 2003, Wilkinson
etal. 2004). The problem with bicolor , by contrast, is that
few appear to know exactly where it may now be found:
recently considered a common and widespread species in
Sumatra (van Marie and Voous 1 988), it appears to have
been so completely trapped out of its forest haunts that
only a single site is known to F. R. Lambert and J. C.
Eames (in litt. 2006), while J. A. Tobias (verbally 2006),
despite several months spent in its range, has never seen
it. Some birds can still be found in markets in northern
Sumatra, but they are very rare and hugely outnumbered
by imported G. leucolophus from the continent (C.
Shepherd verbally 2006).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ana S. L. Rodrigues most generously took the time and trouble to
generate the statistical analyses and tables from my mensural data, and
I thank her profoundly. I am also most grateful to staff at the institutions
where the research for this paper was carried out, most notably BMNH
(Robert Prys-Jones, Mark Adams, Katrina Cook, Jo Cooper), also
AMNH (Paul Sweet, Shannon Kenney, Peter Capainolo), CM (Steve
Rogers), MNHN (Eric Pasquet), MNSG (Enrico Borgo and Giuliano
Doria), RMNH (Rene Dekker) and USNM (James Dean), as well as
Steve Matter (Cincinnati Museum of Natural History), Gene Hess
(Delaware Museum of Natural History, Wilmington) and Dave Willard
and Mary Hennen (Field Museum ofNatural History, Chicago); Craig
Robson, who read through the entire paper and gave it the benefit of
his unparalleled experience of the babblers; Claire Spottiswoode, who
also kindly read and improved the manuscript and advised on and
helped with the presentation of the statistical information; Fergus
Crystal, Simon Harrap, Paul Holt, Ben King, Mathias Ritschard and
Chris Shepherd, who provided key comments on several taxa; Roger
Wilkinson, Laura Gardner and Mike Kilburn, who most helpfully
answered my inquiries about Garrulax courtoisi ; Pam Rasmussen, for
several instructive conversations; Finn Danielsen and Arne Jensen for
the provision of plate 2, Danielsen and Michael and Ria Poulsen for
Plate 3, and John Ferner for Plate 4; Stephen Gregory, Edward
Dickinson, Andrew Polaszek and Robert Prys-Jones, for help in
determining the availability of the name Robsonius ; Amelia Tarzi-Seraj
and Cheng Kai for logistical support; Tim Inskipp for valuable
corrections to the manuscript in press; and three referees, Paul Andrew,
Kees Roselaar and Phil Round (who had earlier also kindly responded
to a request concerning Stachyris rodolphei ), for their most helpful
comments, even while I was unable to respond fully to all their
suggestions.
REFERENCES
Abduiali, H. and D’Cunha, E. (1982) On the validity of Turdoides
caudatus eclipes (Hume). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 79: 199-200.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1971) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan. Vol. 6. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Andrew, P. (1992) The birds of Indonesia: a checklist (Peters’ sequence) .
Jakarta: Indonesian Ornithological Society.
Chasen, F. N. (1935) A handlist of Malaysian birds. Bull. Raffles Mus.
11: 1-389.
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
Cibois, A. (2003a) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of babblers
(Timaliidae). Auk 120: 35-54.
Cibois, A. (2003b) Sylvia is a babbler: taxonomic implications for
the families Sylviidae and Timaliidae. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 123:
257-261.
Cibois, A., Pasquet, E. and Schulenberg, T. S. (1999) Molecular
systematics of the Malagasy babblers (Passeriformes: Timaliidae)
and warblers (Passeriformes: Syvliidae), based on cytochrome b
and 16S rRNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
13: 581-595.
Collar, N. J. (2003) How many bird species are there in Asia? Oriental
Bird Club Bull. 38: 20-30.
Collar, N. J. (2004a) Species limits in some Indonesian thrushes.
Forktail 20: 71-87.
Collar, N. J. (2004b) Subspecies of Taiwan birds — first impressions.
BirdingASIA 2: 34-52.
Collar, N. J., Fishpool, L. D. C., Pilgrim, J. D., Seddon, N. and
Spottiswoode, C. N. (in prep.) The assessment of avian species
rank, 2: quantification of character significance.
Forktail 22 (2006)
A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae)
1 1 1
Danielsen, F., Balete, D. S., Christensen, T. D., Heegaard, M.,
Jakobsen, O. F., Jensen, A., Lund, T. and Poulsen, M. K. (1994)
Conservation of biological diversity in the Sierra Madre mountains of
Isabela and southern Cagayan province, the Philippines. Manila and
Copenhagen: Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
BirdLife International and Danish Ornithological Society.
Deignan, H. G. (1938) A review of the southern ( melanostigma ) group
of the Red-headed Laughingthrush, Garrulax erythrocephalus
(Vigors), with descriptions of two new races from Siam. Proc. Biol.
Soc. Washington 51: 87-92.
Deignan, H. G. (1939) Three new birds of the genus Stachyris. Zool.
Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. 24: 109-114.
Deignan, H. G. (1945) The birds of Northern Thailand. U.S. Nam.
Mus. Bull. 186.
Deignan, H. G. (1952) Chinese races of Pomatorhinus erythrogenys
Vigors. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 65: 119-124.
Deignan, H. G. (1963) Checklist of the birds of Thailand. U.S. Natn.
Mus. Bull. 226.
Deignan, H. G. (1964) Subfamily Timaliinae, Babblers. Pp. 240-427
in E. Mayr and R. A. Paynter, eds. Check-list of birds of the world ,
10. Cambridge, Mass.: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1930) Description de trente oiseaux de
l’Indochine franfaise. Oiseau et R.F.O. 1 1: 393-408.
Delacour, J. andjabouille, P. (1931) Les oiseaux del’Indochine franqaise,
1-4. Paris: Exposition Coloniale Internationale.
Delacour, J. and Mayr, E. (1945) Notes on the taxonomy of birds in
the Philippines. Zoologica 30: 105-117.
Dickinson, E. C. ed. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist
of the birds of the world. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines: an annotated check-list. Tring, U.K.: British
Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list 12).
duPont, J. E. (1971a) Notes on Philippine birds (no.l).
Nemouria 3.
duPont, J. E. (1971b) Philippine birds . Greenville, Delaware: Delaware
Museum of Natural History (Monogr. 2).
Eames, J. C. (2002) Eleven new sub-species of babbler (Passeriformes:
Timaliinae) from Kon Turn Province, Vietnam. Bull. Brit. Om.
Club 122: 109-141.
Eames, J. C., Robson, C. R. and Nguyen Cu (1994) Anew subspecies
of Spectacled Fulvetta Alcippe ruficapilla from Vietnam. Forktail
10: 141-158.
Eames, J. C., Le Trong Trai and Nguyen Cu (1999) A new species of
laughingthrush (Passeriformes: Garrulacinae) from the Western
Highlands of Vietnam. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 119: 4-15.
Eames, J.C., Steinheimer, F.D. and Bansok, R. (2002) A collection of
birds from the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, including a
new subspecies of Arborophila cambodiana. Forktail 18: 67-86.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: A. and C. Black/Christopher Helm.
Harrap, S. (1989) Identification, vocalisations and taxonomy of
Pnoepyga wren-babblers. Forktail 5: 61-70.
Harrap, S. (1992) The specific status of the Bare-headed
Laughingthrush. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 16: 48.
Harrap, S. and Mitchell, K. (1994) More notes on Rabor’s Wren-
Babbler Napothera rabori. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 20: 50-51.
Helbig, A. J., Knox, A. G., Parkin, D. T., Sangster, G. and Collinson,
M. (2002) Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518-525.
Hong Yuan-hua, He Fen-qi, Wirth, R., Melville, D., Zheng Pan-ji,
Wang Xia-zhi, Wang Gui-fu and Liu Zhi-yong (2003) Little-known
Oriental bird: Courtois’s Laughingthrush Garrulax galbanus
courtoisi. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 38: 35—40.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, H. C.
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines.
Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) A field
guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Lekagul, B. (1968) Bird guide of Thailand. Bangkok: privately printed.
Lekagul, B. and Round, P. D. (1991) A guide to the birds of Thailand.
Bangkok: Saha Karn Bhaet.
Long, A., Crosby, M. and Inskipp, T. (1994) A review of the taxonomic
status of the Yellow-throated Laughingthrush Garrulax galbanus.
Oriental Bird Club Bull. 19: 41-48.
van Marie, J. G. and Voous, K. H. (1988) The birds of Sumatra. Tring,
U.K.: British Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list 10).
Mayr, E. and Vuilleumier, F. (1983) New species of birds described
from 1966 to 1975. J. Om. 124: 217-232.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1934) Zoological results of the Third De
Schauensee Siamese Expedition, Part II. — Birds from Siam and
the Southern Shan States. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 86:
165-280.
Oberholser, H. C. (1917) The birds of the Anamba Islands. U.S.
Natn. Mus. Bull. 98.
Pasini, A., Arsuffi, D., Micali, G. and Violani, C. G. (1994)
Identification and captive breeding of Yellow-throated
Laughingthrush Garrulax galbanus. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 19:
48-50.
Rand, A. L. (1960) A new species of babbling thrush from the
Philippines. Fieldiana Zoology 39: 377-378.
Rand, A. L. (1970) An annotated list of Philippine birds. Unpublished
typescript held in USNM.
Rand, A. L. and Rabor, D.S.(1967) New birds from Luzon, Philippine
Islands. Fieldiana Zool. 51: 85-89.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Washington D.C. and Barcelona, Spain: Smithsonian
Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Reddy, S. (2005) Historical biogeography of southern Asia: investigating
patterns of biotic assemblages and their relationships using
endemic avian taxa. PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York,
U.S. A.
Riley, J. H. (1 930a) Two new forms of laughing thrushes from Yunnan.
Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 43: 79-80.
Riley, J. H. (1930b) Descriptions of three new birds from Siam. Proc.
Biol. Soc. Washington 43: 189-192.
Riley, J. H. (1938) Birds from Siam and the Malay Peninsula in the
United States National Museum collected by Drs Hugh M. Smith
and William L. Abbott. U.S. Natn. Mus. Bull. 172.
Ripley, S. D. and Rabor, D. S. (1968) Two new subspecies of birds
from the Philippines and comments on the validity of two others.
Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 81: 31-36.
Robinson, H. C. and Kloss, C. B. (1919) On birds from South Annam
and Cochin China. Part II. Pycnonotidae-Dicaeidae. Ibis (11)1:
565-625.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C. R., Eames, J. C., Nguyen Cu and Truong Van La (1993)
Birds recorded during the third BirdLife/Forest Birds Working
Group expedition in Vietnam. Forktail 9: 89-1 19.
de Roever, J. (1990) Notes on the Luzon Wren-Babbler. Oriental Bird
Club Bull. 12: 33-34.
Round, P.D. and Robson, C. (2001) Provenance and affinities of
the Cambodian Laughingthrush Garrulax f err arius. Forktail 17:
41-44.
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L. (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of
birds of the world. New Haven, U.S. A.: Yale University Press.
Smythies, B. E. (1949) A reconnaissance of the N’Mai Hka drainage,
northern Burma. Ibis 91: 627-648.
N. J. COLLAR
Forktail 22 (2006)
1 12
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Borneo. Third edition. Kota Kinabalu:
The Sabah Society; and Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society.
Smythies, B. E. (1986) The birds of Burma. Third edition. Liss, U.K.:
Nimrod Press, and Pickering, Ontario: Silvio Mattachione and Co.
Smythies, B. E. and Davison, G. W. H. (1999) The birds of Borneo.
Fourth edition. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications
(Borneo).
Stanford, J. K. and Ticehurst, C. B. (1935) Notes on some new or
rarely recorded Burmese birds. Part I. Ibis (13)5: 38-65.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Anderson, G. Q. A., Dvorak, M.,
Evans, T. D., Nemeth, E., Timmins, R. J. and Wilkinson, R. J.
(1995) Ornithological records from Laos, 1992-1993. Forktail
11: 47-100.
Tu Hsiao-wei (2003) Geographic variation of Hwamei ( Garrulax
canoras ) songs. Master’s thesis. Department of Zoology, National
Taiwan University, Taipei. [Abstract in Fang, W.-H. (2005)
Abstracts of ornithological masters’ theses from Taiwan, 1977-
2003. Forktail 21: 99-120.]
Vaurie, C. (1954) Systematic notes on Palearctic birds. No. 6.
Timaliinae and Paradoxornithidae. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1669.
Vaurie, C. (1959) The birds of the Palearctic fauna: Order Passeriformes.
London: H. F. and G. Witherby.
Wilkinson, R., He Fen-qi, Gardner, L. and Wirth, R. (2004) A highly
threatened bird — Chinese yellow-throated laughing thrushes in
China and in zoos. Intematn. Zoo News 51: 456-469.
Wolters, H. E. (1975-1982) Die Vogelarte der Erde: eine systematische
Liste tnit Verbreitungsangaben sowie deutschen und englischen Namen.
Hamburg and Berlin: Paul Parey.
Zimmer, J. T. and Mayr, E. (1943) New species of birds described
from 1938 to 1941. Auk 60: 249-262.
N.J. Collar , BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U.K. Email: nigel.collar@birdlife.org
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
113
The rediscovery and song of the Rusty- throated
Wren Babbler Spelaeornis badeigularis
BEN KING and JULIAN P. DONAHUE
Rusty-throated Wren Babbler Spelaeornis badeigularis was
described by Ripley (1948) from a netted specimen
collected on 5 January 1 947 at about 1 ,600 m near Dreyi
(near or now possibly known as Lohitpur/Lohatipur) in
the Lohit River drainage of the Mishmi Hills, in what is
now Arunachal Pradesh state, north-east India, at
c.28°0'N 96° 1 7'E. The species was not encountered again
in the twentieth century, no doubt due to the inaccessibility
of the Mishmi Hills, an area that even Indian citizens
need a permit to visit. However, in the late 1990s the
permit requirements were relaxed so that foreigners
could visit.
Thus from 15 November to 3 December 2004, we
visited the Mishmi Hills on a birding tour with KingBird
Tours. Our route was different from that of Ali and Ripley,
who concentrated on low-elevation birds on the south¬
east side of the Mishmi Hills. We travelled north from
Roing into the heart of the Mishmi Hills, over Mayodia
Pass and north up the Dibang River valley to Anini, Mipi,
and Dumdin, in order to search for birds in this remote
and little-known area.
One of our prime objectives was to find the Rusty-
throated Wren Babbler. To that end, we brought along a
tape of the Rufous-throated Wren Babbler Spelaeornis
caudatus, a very similar-looking relative from the east
Himalayas west of the Mishmi Hills. A Rusty-throated
Wren Babbler responded the first time we played the tape
at c.28°14'N 95°53'E, c. 1,900 m, near the km 40 sign on
Plate 1
Plate 2
Plate 3
Plates 1-4. Rusty-throated Wren Babbler Spelaeornis badeigularis , km 40 from Roing on the Roing-Hunli Road, Mishmi Hills, Arunachal
Pradesh, India, c. 2,030 m, 2 November 2004.
114
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Plate 5. Habitat at site of rediscovery, km 40 from Roing on the
Roing-Hunli Road, Mishmi Hills, Arunachal Pradesh, India, c. 1,900
m, 18 November 2004.
the road between Roing and Hunli, 1 6 km by road south
of Mayodia Pass, at 08h00 on 18 November 2004. This
is c.9 km in a line north-north-east of Roing and c.47 km
in a line north-west of the type locality. The bird responded
quite strongly to the playback, but stayed under dense
cover and was difficult to see. It took 90 minutes to get
good views of the diagnostic white and black barring on
the sides and breast.
Eventually we encountered a total of 1 7 Rusty-throated
Wren Babblers. They were common along the road
between c. 1,800 m and 2,400 m on the more southern¬
facing slopes between Roing and Mayodia Pass, where
we found 1 5 of the 1 7 birds. On one 3-km stretch of road
at 2,100-2,400 m we heard eight in half a day. On the
more north-facing slopes between Mayodia Pass and Hunli
we noted only two birds, at c. 1,700 m and 2,000 m.
All the Rusty-throated Wren Babblers we saw and/or
heard were adj acent to the road in dense low undergrowth
1-3 m high with some trees overhead, but usually with a
broken canopy. The dense low vegetation was typical of
wet road-cuts and ravines. The broadleaved evergreen
forest along the road was mostly secondary growth. The
wren babblers were very active, typically difficult to
observe, and generally stayed within 1 m of the ground.
Persistent playback of first the Rufous-throated Wren
Babbler song and then later the Rusty-throated Wren
Babbler song eventually brought five or six birds into
view, allowing us excellent views and even some video
footage and still photographs (Plates 1-4).
IDENTIFICATION
Visual field identification of the species is difficult because
of the furtiveness of wren babblers. The key field mark is
the white and black barring on the entire breast and sides
of Rusty-throated Wren Babbler, with the rusty colour
restricted to the throat, while in Rufous-throated Wren
Babbler the breast and sides are rusty to rusty-buff and
black. There is more white on the chin of Rusty- throated
Wren Babbler, which also has a narrow whitish band
across the lower throat (which is best seen when the bird
is singing) . Rufous-throated Wren Babbler lacks this white
band (the feather bases on the throat are blackish). The
paintings of these two species in Grimmett et al. (1998)
are excellent, those in Kazmierczak (2000) poor, while in
Ali and Ripley (1983) and in Rasmussen and Anderton
(2005) the illustration of Rufous-throated Wren Babbler
is poor and that of Rusty-throated Wren Babbler is
unrecognisable.
SONG
The song of Rusty-throated Wren Babbler is highly
variable, ranging from a simple 3- or 4-note whistle or a
short complex warble to a combination of a short warble
and a short trill, all consisting of short, staccato, musical
whistled notes. Each individual appears to have a repertoire
of at least three different songs, including several of the
different song types (see Fig. 1).
Rufous-throated Wren Babbler, by contrast, has a
much less variable song, with a more rigid, stereotyped
structure. The loud, musical, staccato whistles consist of
a simple phrase repeated 2-4 times, often introduced by
the latter half of the phrase. This species’s song is
reminiscent of that of the Common Yellowthroat
Geothlypis trichas.
4
2
0
4
2
0
4
2
0
x
2
0
4
2
0
4
2
0
4
2
0
Spelaeornis badeigularis Spelaeornis caudatus
0 0.5 1.0 0 0.5 1.0
Seconds
Figure 1. Sonagrams of the songs of Rusty-throated Wren Babbler
Spelaeornis badeigularis and Rufous-throated Wren Babbler, Spelaeornis
caudatus. Note the highly variable structure of the former compared to
the rigid, stereotyped structure of the latter, which consists of a single
phrase repeated 2-4 times, often introduced with the latter half of that
phrase. The notes of the songs of both species are loud, short, staccato,
musical whistles.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
115
DISCUSSION
Rusty-throated Wren Babbler is very similar to Rufous-
throated Wren Babbler. Ali and Ripley (1948) noted its
differences from the latter, ‘....from which it differs in
having a white chin, dark chestnut throat and widely barred
breast, abdomen and underparts. In size it is about the
same, but has noticeably shorter tail-coverts’. In a brief
two-page review of the 14 known taxa of the genus
Spelaeomis , Ripley (1950) maintained the specific status
of badeigularis, and he continued this treatment in Ripley
(1961, 1982). Deignan (1964) provisionally treated
badeigularis as a subspecies of caudatus. In a footnote in
Ali and Ripley (1971, 1989), Ripley stated,
A re-examination of the unique type of Spelaeomis
badeigularis and comparison with freshly collected
Spelaeomis caudatus from Bhutan confirms the
separation of badeigularis as a species. The differences
still appear strongly marked. The white chin, the
dark chestnut feathers with darker-streaked centres
of the throat and upper breast, and the extensive area
all over the lower breast, abdomen, flanks and vent
of the subterminal white-tipped bistre feathers, give
an entirely different appearance to this bird. The
upperparts are on the other hand roughly similar.
An added point of difference which I [SDR] had
not noted in my original description is the stouter
tarsus of badeigidaris. The type measures 20 mm in
tarsal length but also appears thicker and stronger.
Three specimens of caudatus measure 17-18 mm, a
small difference on paper, but appearing significant
when these tiny birds are in the hand.
In the description in the main text, the black terminal bar
on the feathers of the lower breast, abdomen, flanks and
vent (not mentioned in the quote above) is noted.
Clements (2000) and the three recent field guides,
Grimmett et al. (1998), Kazmierczak (2000) and
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) maintain badeigularis as
a separate species while Dickinson (2003) lists badeigularis
as a subspecies of caudatus.
We find Ripley’s arguments for retaining badeigidaris as a
valid species convincing, and, in spite of the taxon’s strong
response to the playback of the song of A. caudatus , we feel
that the different structure of the songs of the two species
adds to the evidence for their separation as valid species.
However, we note that we did not encounter Rufous-throated
Wren Babbler at all in the Mishmi Hills and the two species
are not known to be sympatric: the eastern-most record of
Rufous-throated Wren Babbler is from West Kameng District,
Arunachal Pradesh, south-west of the Mishmi Hills (Ripley
1982, Ali and Ripley 1989, Grimmett et al. 1998).
The species is currently listed on the IUCN Red List
status as Vulnerable (BirdLife International 200 1 , 2006),
meeting criteria B 1 a+b(i„ii,iii,v); C2a(ii) owing to its small
and declining range and population, which are estimated
to be 5,200 km2 and 2,500-9,999 individuals respectively.
The fact that this species is common in degraded secondary
forest along the roadside suggests that it faces no immediate
threat, and the range and population are unlikely to be
declining. As such, downlisting it to Near Threatened
might be appropriate.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This expedition would not have been possible without the logistical
expertise of Reet Hazarika (IVAT, International Ventures and Travel,
Gurgaon, Haryana) with local travel arrangements and guide service
by the late Michi Tajo and Bamin Chada (Himalayan Holidays North
East, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh). We thank the Government of
India and the Government of Arunachal Pradesh for permission to visit
the Mishmi Hills. We are particularly indebted to Divisional Forest
Officer Nani Sha, who graciously permitted access to the Mehao and
Dibang Valley Wildlife Sanctuaries. Drivers Mahendra Chetia and
Farukh Hazarika managed sometimes treacherous roads with aplomb.
Gilman and Amini Hazarika of the Nalani Tea Estate, Tinsukia, Assam
were generous hosts for one overnight stay. We thank Sumit Sen for
contributing his graphic expertise to the photographs and an anonymous
reviewer for valuable comments. Jeff Groth made the sonagrams.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1 948) The birds of the Mishmi Hills. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 48(1): 1-37.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1971) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan.
Vol. 6. London: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S., and Ripley, S. D. (1983) A pictorial guide to the birds of the Indian
subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1989) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan.
Vol. 6. Second edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2006) Species factsheet: Spelaeomis badeigidaris.
Available at www.birdlife.org/datazone.
Clements, J. F. (2000) Birds of the world: a checklist. 5th edition. Vista,
California, U.S.A.: Ibis Publishing Co.
Deignan, H. G. (1964) Subfamily Timaliinae, Babblers. Pp. 240-427
in E. Mayr and R. A. Paynter, eds. Check-list of birds of the world ,
10. Cambridge, Mass.: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
Dickinson, E. C. (2003) The Hoivard and Moore complete checklist of the
birds of the world. 3rd edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Kazmierczak, K. (2000) Afield guide to the birds of the Indian subcontinent.
Robertsbridge, East Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Rasmussen, P. C., and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of south Asia: the
Ripley guide. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Ripley, S. D. (1948) New birds from the Mishmi Hills. Proc. Biol. Soc.
Washington 61: 99-110.
Ripley, S. D. (1950) A note about the wren babbler, Spelaeomis. Auk
67(3): 390-391.
Ripley, S. D. (1961) A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan: together
with those of Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Bombay:
Bombay Natural History Society.
Ripley, S. D. (1982) A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan:
together with those of Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
2nd edition. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society.
Ben King , Ornithology Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 1 0024,
U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthlink.net.
Julian P. Donahue, Dept, of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles,
CA 90007-4057, U.S.A. Email: bugbooks@aol.com.
116
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Everett’s White-eye Zosterops everetti in KhaoYai,
north-east Thailand
ANDREW J. PIERCE and PHILIP D. ROUND
Two white-eyes caught and banded at Mo-singto, Khao
Yai National Park (14°26'N, 101°22,E) on 14 July 2004
at 728 m were identified as Everett’s White-eye Zosterops
everetti. This provides the first confirmed evidence of the
presence of this species in north-east Thailand, and is a
significant extension of the species’s known range, which
was previously considered to extend from the Philippines
and the Greater Sundas, northwards through the
Thai-Malaya Peninsula and south-east Thailand to c. 1 3°N
(King era/. 1 975, Lekagul and Round 1991, Robson 2000).
The two birds were caught between 1 4h30 and 1 5h45
in a mist-net placed at the side of a stream. They were
ringed and colour-ringed, and their biometrics were
recorded (T able 1 ) . Both birds were photographed using
a digital camera (Plates 1-2). The salient features of both
individuals were the extent of the yellow on the underparts,
and the lack of yellow on the forecrown. The entire
upperparts from the crown to the uppertail-coverts were
uniformly cold olive-green. In particular, the crown,
forehead (extending to the base of the bill) and the ear-
coverts were uniform olive-green. There was a sharp
demarcation between the olive-green ear-coverts and the
yellow throat. The remiges and rectrices were blackish-
centred, with bright, narrow, yellow-green fringes . A broad
white spectacle was interrupted by a blackish loral line.
The undertail-coverts, hind flanks and thighs were all
yellow, and the yellow extended as an evenly broad,
unbroken median stripe onto the belly and lower breast.
The upper breast was whitish-grey, so that the yellow mid¬
line was cut off short of the throat. The flanks were whitish-
grey. The iris was reddish-brown; the legs were blue-grey
and the soles of the feet fleshy-horn (see Plates 1-2).
Although none of the standard field guides (e.g., King
1975, Lekagul and Round 1991, Robson 1999) mentions
the extent and broadness of the yellow median stripe as
a diagnostic feature, this feature was shown by all Everett’s
White-eye specimens examined at the Natural History
Museum, T ring, U. K. Specimens of Oriental White-eyes
Z. palpebrosus (other than Z. p. melanurus and some Z. p.
siamensis, both of which may be completely yellow below)
showed, at most, a narrow broken yellow median stripe
along the belly that extended to neither the yellow on the
vent nor the throat. In many Oriental White-eye specimens
there was barely any yellow on the mid-line, and in all
specimens the upperparts were more yellowish-green, with
extensive yellow on the forecrown.
Bearing in mind the difficulty of distinguishing the
upperparts colour (colder green in Everett’s, more yellow-
green in Oriental White-eye) or the precise shade of
greyish-white on the flanks, the extent of yellow on the
belly is possibly the best field character for distinguishing
these species.
So, how many species of white-eye are resident in Khao
Yai and the Dong Phaya Yen Forest Complex of north¬
east Thailand, and do Oriental and Everett’s White-eyes
occur there together? In fact, Deignan (1963) did not list
Oriental White-eye for anywhere in the north-east, or away
from the coast in eastern Thailand. Although Dickinson
(1963), Dickinson andTubb (1964) andMcClure (1974)
all listed Oriental White-eye for Khao Yai, there were no
Zosterops spp. among the small number of bird specimens
collected in Khao Yai during the 1960s (Dickinson and
Table 1 . Biometrics of two Everett’s White-eyes Zosterops everetti ringed
in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand, in July 2004.
Plate 1. Everett’s White-eye Zosterops everetti , July 2004, Khao Yai
National Park, Thailand. Photograph: A. Pierce.
Plate 2. Everett’s White-eye Zosterops everetti , July 2004, Khao Yai
National Park, Thailand. Photograph: A. Pierce.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
117
Chaiyaphun 1968). The listing of Oriental White-eye was
based on conversation between E. C. Dickinson and H.
G. Deignan, in which the latter supposed that Oriental
White-eye was the most likely white-eye species to be found
in Khao Yai. However, in 1968, Dickinson identified a
flock of 12 white-eyes in Khao Yai as Everett’s White-eye
on the basis of their ‘very dark flanks’, and all white-eyes
he saw subsequently were likewise identified as Everett’s
White-eye (E. C. Dickinson in litt. 2005). White-eyes in
Khao Yai were also independently identified as Everett’s
by S. Tantidapitak (verbally 2005), from comparison of
video images of both Oriental and Everett’s White-eyes in
other parts of their Thai range, especially in the peninsula.
Thailand’s Dong Phaya Yen forest complex supports
two other species that, like Everett’s White-eye, are mainly
Sundaic in distribution: Scaly-crowned Babbler
Malacopteron cinereum and Moustached Hawk Cuckoo
Hierococcyx vagans (Lynam et al. in press, Lekagul and
Round 1991). These species, however, are known elsewhere
in Indochina, in south Laos (both), Cambodia and Annam
(M. cinereum only: Robson 2000). Although Everett’s
White-eye has now been confirmed in Khao Y ai, there are,
as yet, no records from elsewhere in Indochina other than
from Khao Soi Dao, Chanthaburi province, south-east
Thailand. This strongly suggests that further surveys may
reveal as yet undiscovered, outlying populations of Everett’s
White-eyes in moist evergreen hill-slope habitats in
Indochina, almost certainly in the Cardamom Mountains
of south-west Cambodia, and perhaps elsewhere.
Thus, in addition to further surveys for Everett’s White-
eye, more work is also required to elucidate the range of
Oriental White-eye in north-east and eastern Thailand
and possibly elsewhere in the Indochinese region.
Although Oriental White-eye is apparently widespread in
Indochina (King et al. 1975, Robson 1999, Dickinson
2003), in the absence of specimens or photographs the
presence of this species in Khao Yai and elsewhere in
Dong Phaya Yen must currently be considered as
unconfirmed. If it does occur, it is perhaps more likely to
be found at lower elevations, in disturbed habitats or
deciduous woodland around the park boundaries.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to E. C. Dickinson and Sopitcha Tantitadapitak for
making details of their sight records available, and the former for
commenting on this paper. David Wells kindly commented on white-
eye identification. We thank the Department of National Parks, Wildlife
and Plants Conservation for permission to work in Khao Yai, and the
Natural History Museum, Tring, for allowing access to specimens.
Work at Khao Yai was supported by grant BRT 346004 from the
Biodiversity, Research and Training Program, Thailand.
REFERENCES
Deignan, H. G. (1963) Checklist of the birds of Thailand. U.S. Nat.
Mus. Bulletin 226.
Dickinson, E. C. (1963) A preliminary list of the birds of Khao Yai
National Park. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 20: 183-204.
Dickinson, E. C. (1967) A further contribution on the birds of Khao
Yai National Park. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 22: 173-184.
Dickinson, E. C., ed. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist
of the birds of the world. Third edition. Princeton, U.S. A.: Princeton
University Press.
Dickinson, E. C. and Chaiyaphun, S. (1968) Notes on Thai birds I. On
a small collection of birds from in or near Nakhom Ratchasima
province, Eastern Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 22: 307-3 1 5.
Dickinson, E. C. andTubb, J. A. (1964) Some additions and corrections
to the preliminary list of the birds of Khao Yai National Park. Nat.
Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 20: 269-277.
King, B., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) A field guide
to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Lekagul, B. and Round, P. D. (1991) A guide to the birds of Thailand.
Bangkok: Saha Karn Bhaet.
Lynam, A. J., Round, P. D. and Brockelman, W. Y. (in press) Status of
birds and large mammals in Thailand’s Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai forest
complex. Bangkok: Biodiversity Research and Training Programme.
McClure, H. E. (1974) Some bionomics of the birds of Khao Yai National
Park, Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull Siam Soc. 25(3-4): 99-194.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Andrew J. Pierce, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, School of Bioresources and Technology, Bangkhunthien,
Bangkok 10150, Thailand. Email: andrew@pdti.kmutt.ac.th
Philip D. Round, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 1 0400, Thailand.
Email: frpdr@mahidol. ac. th
Notes on Amami Thrush, Zoothera ( dauma ) major
on Amami Oshima, Ryukyu Islands, Japan
ALEEM AHMED KHAN and MIKIO TAKASHI
Amami Oshima in the northern Ryukyu Islands, Japan, is
situated in a long chain of islands lying between Kyushu
in the north and Taiwan in the south. The island marks
the north-eastern boundary of the Oriental region (Kuroda
1 925, 1926) . The main habitats are subtropical evergreen
and broadleaved forest; Mt Yuan (28°17'33"N
129°19'25"E) is the highest peak at 694 m, and the total
land area is 712 km2. A total of c. 300 bird species, mainly
migrants, are known (Amami Ornithologists’ Club 1 997a),
and the island is well known for its levels of endemism
(Tsukasa and Hachisuka 1925, Kuroda 1925, 1957,
Yamashina 1941).
Amami Thrush Zoothera {dauma) major is one such
endemic taxon. It was listed as Critically Endangered by
118
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
BirdLife International (2001) because its population in
1996 was estimated to number 58 individuals, and to
have undergone serious decline through the 1 990s owing
to habitat loss, and perhaps predation by the introduced
Javan Mongoose Herpestes javanicus. The taxonomic status
of Amami Thrush is unclear: it was accorded specific
status by Ishihara (1986) and this treatment was followed
by Sibley and Monroe ( 1 990) and BirdLife International
(2001). However, Khan and Yamaguchi (2000) and
Ornithological Society of Japan (2000) treat it as a
subspecies of Scaly Thrush Z. daurna; this treatment was
also recommended by Collar (2004) and has now been
adopted by BirdLife International (see www.birdlife.org/
datazone).
During the non-breeding season, White’s Thrush Z.
d. aurea also regularly visits Amami Oshima (Kuroda 1925,
Takashi er al. 1999). The main difference between the
two taxa are their vocalisations: Amami Thrush gives a
chirrup-chewee-chueu-wiow-we-ep song, which is very
distinct from the tuweet...tuweet...tissuhan whistles of
White’s Thrush. Single specimens of Amami Thrush
(collected on 4 December 1998 from Hatsuno, c.35 km
south of Naze city) and White’s Thrush (collected 15
December 1 998, Naze city) were compared. The principal
differences were : gape colour (yellow in Amami, yellowish-
pink in White’s), underpart spotting (denser in Amami),
belly colour (creamier in Amami), underwing-coverts
colour (creamier in Amami), tail feathers (12 in Amami,
1 4 in White’s; more broadly tipped white in Amami), and
tarsi colour (yellowish-grey in Amami, pinkish-red in
White’s). Further study of museum specimens of Z. d.
aurea (n= 1 24) and Z. d. major (n= 1 2) indicates that these
differences are consistent (AAK unpublished data).
METHODS
On 20-21 March 1999, a survey involving 95 volunteers
was carried out. The volunteers were familiarised with
the song of Amami Thrush and the whistle of White’s
Thrush through lectures using audio cassettes and field
visits. A 45-km transect through potential habitat from
Kinsakubaru (28°20'18"N 129°26'54"E) to the base of
Mt Yuan (28°17'31"N 129°19'22"E) via Kamiya forest
was marked out as a line transect by installing markers at
500 m intervals. Each person was allotted a 2-km stretch
of the transect in such a way that each person overlapped
1 km with the previous individual. This strategy was to
check and audit the register of each person’s records.
Each person walked their section in both directions
between 05h40 and 06h40. Volunteers assembled at
02h30, synchronised watches, collected a large-scale map
of their section on which to mark observations, and were
taken to their allocated sections well before the start of the
census. Thrushes were detectable up to c.100 m either
side of the transect. The timing of the census was chosen
because Amami Thrush is vocal only in spring, and for a
shorter period in the autumn, singing mainly in the first
30-50 minutes before dawn.
On the same dates as the transect surveys, searches for
singing Amami Thrushes were carried out at five other
patches of habitat: Asado (28°19'49"N 129°29'51"E),
Angachi (28°22'15"N 129°30'8"E), Aminoko (Akatochi
Yama; 28°9'57"N 1 29°2 1 '56"E), Mt Yuan peak
(28°17'33"N 129°19'25"E) and Setsuko (28°9'48"N
1 29°22'57"E). Subsequently on 22 March 1999,
observations were carried out in three additional areas of
potential habitat: Sumiyogawa (28°18,22"N
129°21'30"E), Kanengodake (28°12'38"N 129°26,0"E)
and Kominato forests (28°19'38"N 1 29°30'29"E).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 64 singing males were recorded on the transect
from Kinsakubaru to the base of Mt Yuan (45) and at the
five other habitat patches (19) including Asado (three),
Angachi (five), Aminoko (Akatochi Yama; three), Mt
Yuan peak (four) and Setsuko (four) . A further ten singing
males were estimated in Sumiyogawa (five), Kanengodake
(two) and Kominato forests (three) Since only males are
presumed to sing, and assuming that each was paired, a
total of 74 pairs can be estimated.
The Amami Ornithologists’ Club have censused the
population of Amami Thrush each March in recent years,
with a total of 58 pairs estimated in 1996 (Amami
Ornithologists’ Club 1997b). Populations in at least
Kinsakubaru and Kamiya forests appear to have been
fairly stable (Amami Ornithologists’ Club 1997b). The
1999 survey described here was the most comprehensive
to date.
There have been few attempts to safeguard the island’s
fragile habitat. There has been unsustainable logging for
the pulp industry and other commercial uses in the recent
past, although levels have diminished recently. Less than
4-5% of the island retains primary forest, with an
additional 10-15% covered in near-primary forests.
Amami Thrush is restricted to these two forest types.
Dumping of non-biodegradable rubbish inside the forest
has been a problem until recently, although the
government has installed signboards to raise awareness,
and forest guards visit the trails periodically. Introduced
mongooses and domestic cats depredate native species,
although the Environmental Agency of Japan and Forestry
and Forest Products Research Institute are trapping to
try to reduce the mongoose population. The recent
establishment of a Wildlife Research Centre may help to
promote scientific research in future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
AAK is grateful to Japan Society for Promotion of Science and
Monbushu for support. Thanks also to: all those who helped in the
census; Ken Ishida; Noritomo Kawaji for comments on the manuscript;
Woei-horng Fang and other friends at Wild Bird Federation Taiwan;
Hem Sagar Baral, Bird Conservation Nepal; Kato Kazuaki, Tomoe
Koshizawa (WBSJ) and Zeng Guangmei.
REFERENCES
Amami Ornithologists’ Club (1997a) Birds in Amami. Naze, Japan:
Amami Ornithologists’ Club. [In Japanese with English summary.]
Amami Ornithologists’ Club (1997b) A population estimate of the
endangered Amami Thrush made by counting singing birds. Strix
15: 117-121.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
1 19
Collar, N. J. (2004) Species limits in some Indonesian thrushes. Forktail
20: 71-87.
Ishihara, T. (1986) The Amami Ground Thrush distinct from the
White’s Ground Thrush. Strix 5: 60-61.
Khan, A. A. and Yamaguchi, Y. (2000) First record ofnidification and
breeding biology of Amami Thrush Zoothera dauma major (Ogawa) ,
Amami Oshima, Japan. Japanese J. Om. 49: 139-144.
Kuroda, N. ( 1 925) A contribution to the knowledge of the avifauna of
the Riu Kiu Islands and the vicinity. Tokyo: Tokyo Printing
Company.
Kuroda, N. (1926) The boundary between the Palearctic and Oriental
regions in the Riu Kiu Islands. Ibis 68: 836-839
Ornithological Society of Japan (2000) Checklist of Japanese birds. Sixth
edition. Tokyo: Ornithological Society of Japan.
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L. (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of
birds of the world. New Haven, U.S.A.: Yale University Press.
Takashi, M., Kawaguchi, K. and Ishida, K. (1999) Morphological
comparison of living Zoothera (dauma) major and Z. d. aurea and
a recommendation on the conservation of Zoothera (d) major. Strix
17: 191-196.
Tsukasa, N. T. and Hachisuka, M. U. (1925) A contribution to the
Japanese ornithology. Ibis 66: 898-908.
Yamashina, M. Y. (1941) On the three endemic birds in the Ryukyu
islands, their classificatory position and zoogeographical meaning.
Biogeographica 3: 319-328.
Aleem Ahmed Khan, Ornithological Society of Pakistan, 109-Block D, Dera GhaziKhan, 32200, Pakistan. Present Address:
Institute of Pure and Applied Biology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. Email: aleembzu@yahoo. co. uk
Mikio Takashi, Amami Ornithologists’ Club, Naze, Kagoshima, Japan.
Extension of the breeding range of Blue-winged
Pitta Pitta moluccensis in peninsular Malaysia
ROBERT HUTCHINSON and ANDY MEARS
During a visit to Taman Negara National Park, Pahang
state, peninsular Malaysia on 25 July 2005, we were
surprised to observe a Blue-winged Pitta Pitta moluccensis ,
a species known to breed only in the north of peninsular
Malaysia (Lambert and Woodcock 1996, Medway and
Wells 1976), carrying food, suggesting that it may have
been breeding. The following day c.150 m from the
location of the initial sighting, RH located the nest, which
contained three nestlings estimated to be approximately
one week old.
The nest was located on a steep slope c.6 m above
ground level in the top of a dead tree stump with one open
side, an unusual location since the nests of Blue-winged
Pitta are typically found on or close to the ground,
occasionally up to c.4 m above ground level (Lambert
and Woodcock 1996). The nest was a quite large dome¬
shaped structure formed mainly of large dry leaves and
small or medium-sized branches, with a vertical west¬
facing entrance hole on the open side of the tree stump.
We were able to watch the nest regularly from 25 to 30
July. Both parents fed the nestlings with approximately
equal frequency and with a variety of prey items, which
appeared to include a large proportion of earthworms.
During our observations, the typical territorial call — a
clear double whistle — was given briefly on only one
occasion, but the adults gave a loud sharp chyeew alarm call
if the nest was approached by humans closer than c.20 m.
Another individual was heard giving the territorial call
almost continuously from an overgrown oil palm plantation
close to the village of Kuala T ahan, just outside the national
park boundary, between 07h30 and 08h00 on 29 July 2005.
Subsequent to our observations, on 9 and 10 August
2005, K. David Bishop and Susan D. Myers observed a
pair of Blue-winged Pittas directly feeding two well-grown
immatures at the same site as our observations, and thus
these birds were likely to be the same pair. The birds were
silent but fairly easy to approach and observe, with the
immatures still at least partly dependent on the adult
birds and frequently observed actively begging for food.
(K. D. Bishop and S. D. Myers in litt. 2005).
Assuming that our estimation of the age of the nestlings
was accurate, this represents an extension to the known
breeding period in peninsular Malaysia, where eggs have
previously been recorded between 10 May and 1 1 July
(Medway and Wells 1976), although nest-building was
reported on 14 July at Ban Bang Tieo, Krabi, Thailand
(Wells in press).
Although Blue-winged Pitta is a common non-breeding
visitor to the Malay Peninsula, breeding within this region
has only ever been confirmed in the extreme north, in
Perlis state and on adjacent Langkawi Island (Lambert
and Woodcock 1996, Medway and Wells 1976). This
breeding record, more than 300 km to the south-east of
previous records therefore considerably extends the known
breeding range of Blue-winged Pitta within the Malay
Peninsula. Medway and Wells (1976) gave the dates of
wintering birds in the peninsula as 25 September to 12
May. By the mid- 1990s the period of absence had shrunk
to just 7-8 weeks, centred on July. By 2000, calling birds
were being reported from mid-Perak and the Pahang sector
of Taman Negara national park throughout July (Wells in
press, T. Carlberg in litt. 2005, W. Veraghtert in litt. 2005,
C. Robson verbally 2005). It would seem that the southerly
limit of over-summering birds has shifted southwards and
this confirmation of breeding at Taman Negara national
park is not entirely unexpected.
The changes in distribution appear to have coincided
with climate change in central Malaysia where long-term
regional warming has been observed over the last couple
of decades (D. Wells in litt. 2005). These climatic changes
120
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
may also be a causal factor in the increaseci elevational
limits of at least six species observed at Bukit Fraser,
Pahang, peninsular Malaysia in August 2003 (Rheindt
2004) . Further monitoring is desirable to track any further
changes in either elevational or range limits for this and
other species within the region that might be related to
regional or global climate change.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Frank E. Rheindt, K. David Bishop, Susan D.
Myers and Craig Robson for useful discussion and comments on the
manuscript. David Wells kindly allowed access to relevant unpublished
manuscripts.
REFERENCES
Lambert, F. (1996) Identification of pittas in the ‘brachyura’ complex
in Asia. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 23: 31-37.
Lambert, F. and Woodcock, M. (1996) Pittas, broadbills and asities.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Medway, L. and Wells, D. R. (1976) The birds of the Malay Peninsula.
Vol. 5. London: Witherby.
Rheindt, F. E. (2004) An incidence of elevational displacement of
birds at Bukit Fraser, peninsular Malaysia. Forktail 20: 130-131.
Robson, C. (2000)./! field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Wells, D. R. (in press) The Birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula , Vol. 2.
London: A. & C. Black.
Robert Hutchinson, do 26 Sutton Avenue, Chellaston, Derby DE73 1RJ, U.K. Email: robhutchinson@birdtourasia.com
Andy Mears, 34 Conygre Green, Timsbury, Bath BA2 0JU, U.K.
Observations of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios
in Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve,
North Sulawesi, Indonesia, with a description of a
secondary vocalisation
ROBERT HUTCHINSON, JAMES EATON and PHIL BENSTEAD
Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios was described as recently
as 1 999 on the basis of a single specimen collected in 1 985
at 1, 1 20 m in the eastern section of Bogani Nani Wartabone
National Park, North Sulawesi (Rasmussen 1999).
Subsequent published records involve an individual
disturbed from its roost at 1 ,700 m in Lore Lindu National
Park in December 1 998 (Mauro 200 1 ), a bird mist-netted
at 1,420 m within the Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve
in November 1999 (Lee and Riley 2001), a bird responding
to tape-playback of the recently described call in
September 2000 (King 2005) and a bird seen and heard
at 1 , 2 5 0 m, again within Gunung Ambang N ature Reserve,
in August 2001 (Trainor et al. 2006). This latter record
involved only the second nocturnal observation of the
species and the first description of a secondary vocalisation.
Here we report another sighting of this species, describe
nocturnal behaviour and produce sonagrams confirming
the recently described secondary calls.
RH and JE visited Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve
on 7-1 1 September 2004. On 8 September, they were
birding at night in selectively logged primary forest at
1,290 m along the trail to Paya Swamp (00°46.295'N
124°23.442'E) when at c.21h00 they heard a series of
unfamiliar owl calls. The calls appeared similar to the
description they had been given by PB of vocalisations of
a Cinnabar Hawk Owl he had heard and seen here on 24
August 2001, although PB was uncertain whether the call
was territorial in nature or the begging call of a young bird
or female. Such secondary calls are rarely given by most
Asian Ninox owls (personal observations, Konig et al.
1999) . After the description of the territorial call by King
(2005), it became apparent that this call did indeed
represent a secondary vocalisation.
Despite calling regularly, the bird proved rather elusive
and was quite unresponsive to playback of recordings of
its call . It was some time before the bird was finally located
calling from exposed branches high in the canopy. Despite
the initially rather distant views, the combination of
predominantly chestnut plumage, lack of facial markings
and yellow irides immediately suggested that it was indeed
Cinnabar Hawk Owl. Fortunately, the bird then gave
good views. It called frequently until c.0 1 hOO hours when
it became more elusive, called less frequently and was
only seen on two more occasions prior to dawn. Closer
views allowed us to note other key features, including: the
lack of white markings in the wing-coverts and flight
feathers, these being restricted to the scapulars; pale
markings giving a dappled effect on the chestnut
underparts; and the entirely pale bill and cere. The bird
appeared short-tailed (with the wing-tips falling level with
tail-tip) and rather compact in appearance. The bird was
again present in the same small area on the evenings of 9
and 10 September and we were able to study it at length
for c.3 hours in total. In addition, another bird was heard
and recorded at 1,280 m, c.2 km away just after dusk on
9 September. Unfortunately this individual was fairly
distant on a steep forested slope and was not seen, but the
calls of the two birds seemed identical.
On 9 and 10 September, the bird began calling at
c. 1 7h50 (just prior to dusk) and foraged for c. 1 0 minutes
shortly after dusk in the same clearing, created by a recently
felled tree, near the top of a moderately steep slope at a
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
121
10-
2
Time (seconds)
Figure 1 . Sonagram of single call note of Cinnabar Hawk Owl, Gunung
Ambang Nature Reserve, Sulawesi, Indonesia, September 2004
(recordings by RH).
distinctly harsher. Calls of Minahassa Owl T. inexspectata
are also harsher, more nasal and longer in duration, typically
lasting 1.8 seconds (Mauro and Drivers 2000). Although
these calls appear not to be territorial in nature, they may be
a useful way of locating birds, at least during the season that
we made our observations. Further study is required to
determine their function and whether they are given
throughout the year. A copy of the sound recordings has
been deposited at the British Library Sound Archive, London.
The species has so far only been recorded within
protected areas, namely Bogani Nani Wartabone National
Park and Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve in North
Sulawesi, and Lore Lindu National Park in Central
Sulawesi. All records have been between 1,120 m and
1,700 m, indicating that the species occupies higher
elevations than the sympatric Ochre-bellied Hawk-owl
Ninox ochracea, which seems to be restricted to the lowlands
below 800 m (Rasmussen 1999). Although forest at higher
elevations on Sulawesi is relatively intact at present (Lee
and Riley 200 1 ) and the species is likely to occur on other
forested mountains on Sulawesi, Cinnabar Hawk Owl
should continue to be treated as Vulnerable on the IUCN
Red List owing to its restricted range (Birdlife International
2001). Now that its vocalisations have been described, it
is hoped that surveys can be carried out to establish the
true status and distribution of this enigmatic bird.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Des Allen kindly prepared the sonagrams of our recordings.
REFERENCES
0 2 4 6
Time (seconds)
Figure 2. Sonagram of double call note of Cinnabar Hawk Owl, Gunung
Ambang Nature Reserve, Sulawesi, Indonesia, September 2004
(recordings by RH).
height of c. 5-10 m. Subsequently, the bird was only ever
observed in the middle or upper canopy c. 1 5-25 m above
the ground, and generally called and fed from open,
unobscured branches. It was frequently observed feeding,
sallying out from open branches to catch flying insects
before returning either to the same perch or one nearby.
On at least three occasions when the bird was feeding high
in the canopy it hovered for up to three seconds during
sallies. These observations suggest that the species does
indeed prey largely on flying insects as suggested by
Rasmussen (1999), a hypothesis based on morphological
similarities between Cinnabar Hawk Owl and owlet-
nightjars Aegothelidae.
The call, often given repeatedly for 1-2 hour periods,
was superficially rather 7v?o-like, consisting of a single dry,
nasal, hissing shriek typically 0.5-0. 7 seconds in duration,
becoming louder and harsher before ending rather abruptly
(Fig. 1). It was delivered rather irregularly, usually with 6-
10 seconds between calls, although occasionally as little as
0.5-1 .0 seconds (Fig. 2). In response to playback, the bird
did not approach but it increased its rate of calling. After
long periods of silence, the bird would often begin calling
again in response to playback.
Sulawesi Owl Tyto rosenbergi produces calls of similar
duration, but these are more explosive, higher-pitched and
Birdlife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K. : BirdLife International.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea,
Sulawesi, the Moluccas and the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia.
Alderley, Queensland, Australia: Dove Publications.
King, B. (2005) The call of Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios in North
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forktail 21: 173-174.
Konig, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.-H. (1999) Owls: a guide to the owls
of the world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Lee. R. J. and Riley, J. (2001) Morphology, plumage, and habitat of
the newly described Cinnabar Hawk-owl from North Sulawesi,
Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 113: 17-22.
Mauro, I. and Drivers, R. (2000) Minahassa Owl Tyto inexspectata at
Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia in December 1 998.
Forktail 16: 180-182.
Mauro, I. (2001) Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios at Lore Lindu National
Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, in December 1998. Forktail
17: 118-119.
Rasmussen, P. C. (1999) A new species of hawk-owl from North
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Wilson Bull. Ill (4): 457-464.
Riley, J. and Mole, J. (2001) The birds of Gunung Ambang Nature
Reserve, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forktail 17: 57-66.
Trainor, C. R., Benstead, P. J., Martin, K., Lesmana, D., Agista, D.,
Benstead, M. C., Drijvers, R. and Setiawan, I. (2006) New bird
records for Nusa Tenggara islands: Sumbawa, Moyo, Sumba,
Flores, Pulau Besar and Timor. Kukila 13: 6-22.
Robert Hutchinson, do 26 Sutton Avenue, Chellaston, Derby DE73 6RJ, U.K. Email: robhutchinson@birdtourasia.com
James Eaton, 17 Keats Avenue, Littleover, Derby DE23 4EE, U.K. Email: jameseaton@birdtourasia.com
Phil Benstead, The Old Stables, Church Street, Reepham, Norwich NR 10 4JW, U.K. Email: phil.benst01@tesco.net
122
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Some observations on the diet of Red-faced Malkoha
Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus in Sri Lanka
AMILA SALGADO
Red-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus is a
Vulnerable species found in the remaining intact
rainforests of the wet zone, and a few scattered riverine
forests of the intermediate and dry zones, in Sri Lanka, to
which it is endemic (BirdLife International 2001).
Sinharaja World Heritage Reserve (hereafter referred as
Sinharaja), the largest expanse of lowland rainforest in Sri
Lanka (Gunatilleke etal. 2004) with an area of 1 1,187 ha,
remains its foremost stronghold.
The species can be often seen joining mixed-species
bird flocks, a strategy adopted primarily by insectivorous
birds in the tropics in order to maximise feeding efficiency
and to reduce the risk of predation (Powell 1985,
Kotagama and Goodale 2004). It was found in 48% of
flocks in Sinharaja by Kotagama and Goodale (2004). It
only utters soft grunt-like calls and lacks loud conspicuous
vocalisations (de Silva Wijeyeratne 2000, personal
observations) . It is usually found in the forest canopy but
also descends almost to the ground, especially where the
undergrowth is thick (Fuller and Erritzoe 1 997). It moves
through dense foliage discreetly, often "melting away’ to
rematerialise in another place moments later, making it
rather difficult to obtain prolonged views.
Owing to these habits, its ecology, and particularly its
diet, is poorly known. Early literature described the species
to feed almost exclusively on fruit and berries, although
insect remains were found in the stomachs of the specimens
(Legge 1880, Henry 1955). However, recent reports
describe the species feeding only on insects (Fuller and
Erritzoe 1997, D. Warakagoda in litt. to BirdLife
International 200 1 , Gunawardene et al. 2002, Kotagama
Plate 1. Red-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus feeding on
giant stick insect, December 2004, Sinharaja, Sri Lanka.
and Goodale 2004) and a large lizard (Kamalgoda and
Anthony 2003), probably a hump-nosed lizard
Lyriocephalus scutatus (N. Kamalgoda verbally 2005).
Here I describe two observations of Red-faced Malkoha
feeding on rainforest insects.
First observation
On 3 1 December 2004 at 1 0h25, while observing a mixed-
species bird flock in Sinharaja, I saw a Red-faced Malkoha
fly into a dense thicket c.12 m above the ground, and
c.12 m from me. The bird had white irides and was
therefore identified as a female (males have brown irides:
Legge 1880). At 10h30 it appeared on a more exposed
branch holding in its beak a 25-cm long giant stick insect
Palophus sp. (order Phasmatodea). I observed the bird
through Leica Trinovid 10x42 binoculars, and I took a
sequence of 53 photographs using a Kowa TSN 823
telescope and a Nikon coolpix 4500 digital camera over
the next six minutes whilst the bird ate its prey. The bird
shook the insect violently and on several occasions it
appeared to nearly slip off its perch. At least the left rear
limb was removed through this process (Plate 1). Stick
insects are capable of autotomy (shedding limbs) in an
emergency to divert the attention of an attacker
(Meegaskumbura 1999) . The bird then removed the thorax
(Plate 2). Many species of stick insect deter predators by
secreting a milky substance from special glands in their
thorax. (Meegaskumbura 1999). The complete removal
of the thoracic area may be to avoid this substance. The
bird then shifted perches, removed the remaining limbs,
and swallowed the remainder of the insect.
Plate 2 . Red-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus feeding on
giant stick insect, December 2004, Sinharaja, Sri Lanka.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
123
Plate 3. Red-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus feeding on
preying mantis, April 2005, Sinharaja, Sri Lanka.
Second observation
On 4 April 2005 at 17h45, while observing a mixed-
species bird flock after a heavy downpour in Sinharaja, I
observed a female Red-faced Malkoha flitting inside the
canopy of a Shorea congestiflora, c.15 m high and c.7 m
from me. A few minutes later, the bird flew down to an
exposed branch with a preying mantis in its beak. I watched
the bird and obtained a sequence of nine photographs as
it ate the insect over the next three minutes. As before, it
violently beat the insect, almost losing its balance on the
perch, before shifting to another perch and swallowing
the prey.
DISCUSSION
During a two-month visit to Sri Lanka, Fleming (1977)
made nine separate observations of Red-faced Malkoha
and although he did not directly observe feeding, he noted
that the birds appeared to forage for insects. Recent reports
have confirmed insect prey, e.g. a large 5 cm-long
caterpillar, and caterpillars of a common pest of teak
Tectonagrandis (Fuller and Erritzoe 1 997), canopy insects
(D. Warakagoda in litt. to BirdLife International 2001),
a large caterpillar (Gunawardene et al. 2002), a cicada
and c.10 cm-long caterpillars (E. Goodale in litt. 2005),
a large, c.8 cm-long, green grasshopper-like insect (U.
Ekanayake verbally 2005) and moths (D. Warakagoda
verbally 2005) . My observations are consistent with these.
However, early reports described Red-faced Malkoha
as feeding almost exclusively on fruit and berries (Henry
1955), although the remains of insects were found in the
stomachs of specimens (Legge 1880). From recent
observations it is clear that Red-faced Malkoha is largely
insectivorous, but given these earlier reports it is possible
to conclude that it is probably omnivorous. The only recent
observation of fruit-eating was apparently of one bird in
Sinharaja eating a red berry from an unidentified plant
species on 1 9 April 2005 (reported by W. Wickremesekera
to G. de Silva Wijeyeratne in litt. 2005), but verification
would be desirable, and further studies are needed to
determine the identity and importance of fruit in the diet.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank: Sarath W. Kotagama for improving the
manuscript; Eben Goodale for his useful suggestions and sharing his
observations; two reviewers and Kelum Manamendra-Arachchi for
valuable criticisms of the manuscript; Deepal Warakagoda and Upali
Ekanayake for sharing their field observations with me; and the late
Laurence Poh for his encouragement to take up digiscoping. Finally,
I am immensely thankful to my clients who were with me at the time
of the observations and shared my joy.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened Birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Fleming, R. L. (1977) Comments on the endemic birds of Sri Lanka.
Colombo: Ceylon Bird Club and Wildlife and Nature Protection
Society.
Fuller, R. A and Erritzoe, J. (1997) Little-known Oriental bird: Red¬
faced Malkoha. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 26: 35-39.
Gunatilleke, C. V. S., Gunetilleke, I. A. U. N., Ethugala, A. U. K. and
Esufali, S. (2004) Ecology of Sinharaja rain forest and the forest
dynamics plot in Sri Lanka’s natural World Heritage Site. Colombo:
WHT Publications.
Gunawardene, K., Samaraweewa, P., Kumaranayagam, K. and
Wikramanayake, T. (2002) Morapitiya 11.8. Ceylon Bird Club
Notes August 2002: 158.
Henry, G. M. (1955) A guide to the birds of Ceylon. London: Oxford
University Press.
Kamalgoda, N. and Anthony, P. (2003) Sinharaja 10.9. Ceylon Bird
Club Notes September 2003: 148.
Kotagama, S. W. and Goodale, E. (2004) The composition and spatial
organization of mixed species flocks in a Sri Lankan rainforest.
Forktail 20: 63-70.
Legge, W. V. (1880) A history of the birds of Ceylon. Second edition.
Dehiwala: Tisara Prakasakayo.
Meegaskumbura, M. (1999) Miniature giants. Sri Lanka Nature 2(3):
22-24.
Powell, G. V. N. (1985). Sociobiology and adaptive significance of
interspecific foraging flocks in the Neotropics. Omithol. Monogr.
36: 713-732.
de Silva Wijeyeratne, G. (2000) Red-faced Malkoha captured on film.
Loris 22(4): 44-45.
Amila Salgado, 146D, Ekanayake Nizuasa, Bomiriya, Kaduwela, Sri Lanka. Email: amila@sri.lanka.net
124
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Instances of successful raising of three chicks by
Sarus Crane Grus antigone pairs
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR
Successful breeding pairs of cranes in the genus Grus
characteristically raise one or two chicks each season,
since their clutch size is generally one or two eggs. Very
few nests have three or four eggs (Walkinshaw 1973,
Johnsgard 1 983, Littlefield 1 995, Allan 1 996, Meine and
Archibald 1996). Studies on the breeding biology of Sarus
Cranes Grus antigone in India have shown that this species
rarely has clutch sizes of three (Walkinshaw 1973, K.
Kathju in litt. 2006) or four (Sundar and Choudhury
2005), and breeding pairs characteristically raise one or
two chicks each year (Sundar and Choudhury 2003).
Here I describe two instances of pairs fledging three chicks
successfully.
OBSERVATIONS
On 12 December 1998, I observed a Sarus Crane pair in
its breeding territory foraging with three immatures near
Bhartana town, Etawah district, Uttar Pradesh (Plate 1).
All three chicks were sufficiently old that they had clearly
hatched in the 1 997 nesting season (usually July-October
in the region). This region has a large population of
breeding Sarus Cranes that defend discrete, perennial
territories and engage in regular antagonistic displays
with neighbouring pairs. Detailed observations on families
with colour-banded young during 1998-2002 showed
that pairs are aggressive to chicks that are present in
neighbouring territories, and adults generally remain near
young birds. The family with three chicks observed
were not near wetlands that held congregations of non¬
breeding adults.
On 26 January 2006, I observed another pair with
three newly fledged chicks in Kheda district, Gujarat (Plate
2) . The three chicks were foraging together. The juveniles
Plate 1 . Sarus Crane pair (foreground and far right) with three
immatures, 12 December 1998, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India.
were sufficiently young that they had clearly hatched in
the 2005 nesting season (usually July-October in this
region) . There have been no studies in this region involving
colour-banded birds, although it is known that breeding
pairs maintain territories that are abandoned during the
dry season when birds congregate at reservoirs (Mukherjee
1999, K. Kathju in litt. 2006).
DISCUSSION
Observations of pairs with three chicks of apparently
similar age have been made in breeding pairs and migrating
flocks of Sandhill Cranes G. canadensis (Drewien et al.
1995, Nesbitt et al. 2001), and in migrating flocks of
Sarus Cranes in Cambodia (G. W. Archibald verbally
2006) . In addition, observations of Sandhill Cranes with
chicks of clearly different ages in their territories have also
been made in Wisconsin (J. Barzen and M. Hayes in litt.
2006).
Three hypotheses have been offered to explain this
phenomenon: ( 1 ) the three chicks were siblings raised by
the same pair; (2) one or two chicks were ‘adopted’; or (3)
one or two chicks joined a different family after being
separated from their parents. In the observation of Sandhill
Cranes by Nesbitt et al. (2001) and the present
observations, the three chicks in both instances were in
their natal territories and of similar ages, suggesting that
the first explanation is most likely.
Three-egg clutches in Sarus Crane nests have been
observed in Rajasthan (Walkinshaw 1973) and Gujarat
(Kathju submitted) . Only one nest with four eggs is known
from Uttar Pradesh (Sundar and Choudhury 2005). In
the observations in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, the adults
abandoned additional eggs after the hatching of two chicks,
Plate 2. Sarus Crane pair (preening on the left) with three newly
fledged chicks, 26 January 2006, Kheda district, Gujarat, India.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
125
even though the additional egg was fertile in one case
(Sundar and Choudhury 2005, Kathju in prep.) - In Sarus
Crane pairs that successfully raise two chicks, the adult
birds usually forage with one chick each (personal
observations) suggesting that three chicks might be
difficult to raise. Observations on foraging by the three-
chick families would be interesting, but were not possible
during these two observations. Additionally, space-
utilisation models show that clutches of 1-2 eggs appear
to be optimal for cranes to incubate (see Sundar and
Choudhury 2005), suggesting that three- or four-egg
clutches, and hence occurrences of crane pairs raising
more than two chicks, will be very rare.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The visit to Etawah in 1998 was supported by the Wildlife Institute of
India as part of the project ‘Impact of Land Use Changes on the
Ecology and Habitat of the Sarus Crane ( Grits antigone amigone ) in the
Indo-Gangetic Flood Plains’ managed by B. C. Choudhury, and the
visit to Kheda was supported by Bettye and Darrell Leidigh through
a grant to the Kalapana Chawla Fund for Cranes and Wetlands. I
thank R. Chauhan, S. Chaudhry and P. Trivedi for their company
during the two field visits, K. Kathju for many discussions on the
breeding habits of the Sarus Crane in Gujarat, J. Barzen andM. Hayes
for several discussions on Sandhill Cranes in Wisconsin, and G. W.
Archibald, B. Didrickson and S. Nesbitt for assistance with literature
and unpublished information.
REFERENCES
Allan, D. G. (1996) A review of the biology and conservation status of
cranes. Pp. 1 3-51 in R. D. Beilfuss, W. R. TarbotonandN.N.Gichuki,
eds. Proceedings 1993 African Crane and Wetland Training Workshop.
Baraboo, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: International Crane Foundation.
Drewien, R. C., Brown, W. B. and Kendall, W. L. (1995) Recruitment
in Rocky Mountain greater sandhill cranes and comparison with
other crane populations. J. Wildl. Manage. 59: 339-356.
Johnsgard, P. A. (1983) Cranes of the world. Indiana, U.S.A.: Indiana
University Press.
Kathju, K. (in prep.) Observations of unusual clutch size, renesting
and egg concealment by Sarus Cranes Grus antigone in Gujarat.
Littlefield, C. D. (1995) Demographics of a declining flock of greater
sandhill cranes in Oregon. Wilson Bull. 107: 667-674.
Meine, C. D. and Archibald, G. W. (1996) Cranes: status survey and
conservation action plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.:
IUCN.
Mukherjee, A. (1999) Ecological study on the Sarus Crane Grus amigone
in Gujarat state. PhD thesis submitted to Saurashtra University,
Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Nesbitt, S. A., Folk, M. J., Schwikert, S. T. and Schmidt, J. A. (2001)
Aspects of reproduction and pair bonds in Florida sandhill cranes.
Proc. North Am. Crane Workshop 8: 31—35.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2003) The Indian Sarus
Crane Grus a. antigone : a literature review. J. Ecol. Soc. 16: 16-41.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2005) Effect of incubating
adult sex and clutch size on egg orientation in Sarus Cranes Grus
antigone. Forktail 21: 179-181.
Walkinshaw, L. H. 1973. Cranes of the world. New York, U.S.A.:
Winchester Press.
K. S. Gopi Sundar, Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group, do International Crane Foundation, E - 11376, Shady
Lane Road, Baraboo, Wisconsin 53913-0447, U.S.A. andc/o Wildlife Protection Society of India, M-52, Greater Kailash
Part-1, New Delhi 110048, India. E-mail: gopi@savingcranes.org
Some significant bird records from the Cardamom
Mountains, Cambodia, including the first recent
record of Silver Oriole Oriolus mellianus
JOHN D. PILGRIM and ANDREW J. PIERCE
The Cardamom Mountains of south-west Cambodia have
been the subject of significant international attention in
recent years. The 401,000 ha Central Cardamom
Protected Forest (CCPF) was declared in July 2002. The
flanking 334,000 ha Phnom Samlcos and 254,000 ha
Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuaries have been proposed
for the Cambodian government’s list of tentative World
Heritage Sites, and the combined area covers three
Important Bird Areas (Seng Kim Hout et al. 2003). In
2004, the Forestry Administration created the 145,000
ha Southern Cardamom Protected Forest, almost
connecting the CCPF to the 170,000 ha Botum Sakor
National Park, to form a near-contiguous 1 .3 million ha
corridor.
The status and distribution of Cambodia’s avifauna is
better known than that of any other faunal group, and is
now well enough understood to set conservation priorities
with confidence (Seng Kim Hout et al. 2003, Thomas
and Poole 2003) . However, most biological surveys in the
south-west of the country have taken place either in the
heights of the Cardamom Mountains (e.g., Eames et al.
2002) or at low elevations to their south-east (Net Neath
and Tan Setha 2001, Kong Kim Sreng and Tan Setha
2002). The southern foothills of the Cardamom
Mountains have thus been poorly surveyed.
As part of an effort to fill in this knowledge gap, from
12 to 18 December 2002 a team of six field scientists, of
which the two authors formed the ornithological
component, conducted preliminary surveys south of the
Central Cardamom Protected Forest in conjunction with
the Department of Forest and Wildlife. We report here on
significant bird records from these surveys.
126
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
STUDY SITE AND METHODOLOGY
Surveys concentrated within a section of a forestry
concession, managed by the Silver Road company, at
c.200-500m (1 1°35-44'N 103°13-26'E). Cambodia has
a tropical monsoon climate, with hottest temperatures in
March and April, followed by a wet season from May to
October, and coldest temperatures in December and
January. Rainfall in the mountains reaches c.3,800 mm/
year. Reflecting this, the native vegetation cover of the
survey area is lowland broadleaf evergreen rainforest with
scattered natural edaphic grasslands including, in some
instances, broadleaf and needleleaf Pinus merkusii trees.
There are also several herbaceous wetlands and poorly
drained, nitrogen-deficient shrublands. However, the
survey area has a history of human disturbance, including
intensive logging in the early 1990s. Logging has removed
a very high proportion of the large forest trees, leaving
secondary, very disturbed forest, with a dense understorey
of spiny lianas, bamboo and saplings. Facilitated by logging
roads and trails, hunting and non-timber forest product
collection occur at a low density. Further clearance and
development for mixed agriculture has occurred in the
northern section of the study area, along the road to Thma
Bang. Future additional clearance can be expected north
from the recently rebuilt Route 48 linking Koh Kong and
Phnom Penh.
Ornithological surveys were designed to attempt to
find any species of conservation importance during the
limited time available. They thus concentrated on
opportunistic diurnal searching — concentrated near dusk
and dawn — in the remaining better forest along ridges
and in narrow riparian bands, within a relatively accessible
c. 10,000 ha area of the logging concession. Playback of
vocalisations and monitoring of fruiting and flowering
trees were employed where necessary. About 60 hours of
intensive fieldwork were conducted, along with more
casual observations at night or while moving between
fieldwork sites. The weather was clear, dry and calm
throughout the survey period.
SIGNIFICANT RECORDS
In total, 107 bird species were recorded, including one
threatened and one Near Threatened species.
GREAT Hornbill Buceros bicomis
Near Threatened. This species was recorded as individuals
or pairs (just a few birds each day) on 12, 14, and 17
December. This low encounter rate may reflect the paucity
of large trees left after logging in this area, and high hunting
levels, as it is apparently common in other parts of the
Cardamom Mountains (e.g. Steinheimeretu/. 2000, Swan
and Long 2003).
Silver Oriole Oriolus mellianus
Vulnerable. On 18 December, two or three male Silver
Orioles Oriolus mellianus were seen in heavily logged
evergreen forest at about 450 m altitude (11°37'N
103°24'E). The birds were watched from a clearing
through binoculars for about five minutes. They were
initially seen near the top of a partially dead tree less than
40 m away, but almost immediately flew closer and into
the canopy of another tree at a distance of about 20 m.
The birds were actively moving about in the tree-tops and
were obscured much of the time. However, good views
and confirmation of their identity were obtained when
individuals perched on exposed branches at the top of the
nearer tree. The birds again flew, apparently not far, but
this time out of sight. Both authors are familiar with the
other orioles of the region and the two birds that were
seen well were almost immediately identified as Silver
Orioles. They had maroonish-coloured tails with black
head and wings, contrasting strongly with the pale, off-
white mantle, rump and underparts. A third bird was
most likely of this species but was not seen well enough
to confirm its identity. Female Maroon Oriole O. traillii
could potentially be confused with female O. mellianus ,
but has a darker, maroon-brown mantle to rump, and
darker, more uniform undertail-coverts. Male O. mellianus
is essentially unmistakeable.
This sighting represents the second documented record
of Silver Oriole in Cambodia following a female collected
from Bokor on 12 December 1927 (Delacour 1929a,b).
Bokor National Park recently provided the third
Cambodian record, in the form of a male accompanied by
Swinhoe’s Minivets Pericrocotus cantonensis at c.650 m (F.
Rheindt in litt. 2005). This species breeds in southern
China and winters in southern Thailand and Cambodia,
but is poorly known across its range, particularly on its
wintering grounds (BirdLife International 2001). It is
classified as Vulnerable because it has a small, declining
population as a result of loss and fragmentation of forest
in its breeding and wintering grounds (BirdLife
International 2004) . In its non-breeding range, the species
is known to occur at 300- 1,300 m (Smith 1934, P. Round
in litt. 2006) but lower elevations such as those studied
here have been less surveyed.
All other records outside of the breeding grounds,
except a couple from southern China, have been from
Thailand, but these are few and scattered (BirdLife
International 2001). The first Thai records were from the
south-east, adjacent to the Cardamoms, and so a further
Cambodian record from this region is not unexpected.
Crosby (1991) and Bird Conservation Society ofThailand
(2004) suggested that Silver Orioles occur regularly at
Khao Yai National Park, but this no longer appears to be
the case as three years of intensive bird surveys in the
headquarters area have failed to produce a single sighting
(Round et al. 2004, AJP personal observations) . The only
recent record from Khao Yai that we are aware of is a
probable sighting in October 2000 (P. Benstead in litt.
2005). Likewise, previously annual records from Kaeng
Krachan in Thailand reduced from the mid- to late 1 990s
(P. Round in litt. 2006). The only other records we have
been able to trace subsequent to those compiled for
BirdLife International (2001) are from Thailand’s main
remaining forests in the far north and west (Robson 2003,
Bird Conservation Society of Thailand 2004, 2006a, b;
one otherwise undocumented and unverifiable internet
posting of three birds at Doi Ankang (=Doi Ang Khang)
on 17 February 2003).
Since this species appears to be locally common on its
breeding grounds in China (BirdLife International 2004),
the scarcity of recent wintering records may simply reflect
observer effort. Few winter surveys have taken place in
low-altitude moist forest in south-west Cambodia or
southern Myanmar, so it is quite possible that we are only
now discovering the main non-breeding grounds. Despite
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
127
limited data, and possible observer bias (since males are
more striking), it is interesting to note that 1 0 of 1 1 sexed
wintering records refer to males (BirdLife International
2001, Bird Conservation Society of Thailand 2004, this
paper) . This offers some possibility that females may even
winter to the north of the majority of records from relatively
well-watched southern Thailand. However, lowland forest
both in the south-east Asian wintering grounds and around
the Chinese breeding grounds has been reduced and
fragmented over the last 50 years (FAO 2005) and we
should not be too complacent about the prospects for this
species. It is hoped that further surveys identify the main
wintering grounds of this species and thus facilitate
ongoing assessment of its conservation status.
Yellow-bellied Warbler Abroscopus superciliaris
Two records on 18 December, of two birds and one bird
respectively, were characteristically in small thickets of
bamboo. These comprise only the second locality record
for Cambodia, and the first for the south-west (Davidson
2000, Goes and Davidson 2002). The species has,
however, been recorded from Khao Soi Dao in the south¬
east of Thailand.
MOUNTAIN Fulvetta Alcippe peracensis grotei
This species was heard and tape-recorded in some of the
higher-quality forest found during this survey on 15, 16
and 18 December, and observed on 15 December. Birds
were typically seen in small single species flocks of c.3-6
individuals. The subspecies observed, Black-browed
Fulvetta A p. grotei , is accorded specific status by Robson
(2000) . This is the first record of this taxon for Cambodia,
although A. p. grotei is known from neighbouring south¬
east Thailand and A. p. peracensis is likely, though
unconfirmed, to occur in north-east Cambodia (P.
Davidson in litt. 2003).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This survey was undertaken on behalf of, and funded by, the Global
Conservation Fund. Logistics of the trip were meticulously organised by
the Rapid Assessment Program and Cambodia Program of Conservation
International. Our time in the field was very much enhanced by the
company of our colleagues from Conservation International and the
United States Geological Survey, and our work was greatly facilitated by
the supporting personnel that accompanied us from the Department of
Forest and Wildlife, Cardamom Conservation Program, and
Conservation International. Thanks to Mike Crosby, Mike Kilbum,
Michael Lau, Phil Round, and Jack Tordoff for help tracing bird records.
This manuscript benefited from comments by Thomas Brooks, Jenny
Daltry, Pete Davidson, Colin Poole and an anonymous reviewer.
REFERENCES
Bird Conservation Society of Thailand (2004) Directory of Important
Bird Areas in the Kingdom of Thailand: key sites for conservation.
Bangkok: Bird Conservation Society of Thailand and BirdLife
International.
Bird Conservation Society of Thailand (2006a) Recent reports
November 2005-January 2006. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thai. Bull. 23
(2) . Available online at www.bcst.or.th
Bird Conservation Society of Thailand (2006b) Recent reports
December 2005-February 2006. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thai. Bull. 23
(3) . Available online at www.bcst.or.th
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Crosby, M. (1991) Little-known Oriental Bird. Oriental Bird Club
Bull. 14: 32-35
Davidson, P., ed. (2000) Twenty six further new species for Cambodia.
Cambodia Bird News 6: 37-43.
Delacour, J. ( 1 929a) On the birds collected during the fourth expedition
to French Indo-China. Ibis (12)5: 193-220, 403-429.
Delacour, J. (1929b) Les oiseaux migrateurs de l’lndochine franchise.
J. Omit hoi. 77 Suppl. 2: 71-82.
Eames, J. C., Steinheimer, F. D. and Ros Bansok (2002) A collection
of birds from the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, including a
new subspecies of Arborophila cambodiana. Forktail 18: 67-86.
FAO (2005) State of the world’s forests 2005. Rome: Food and Agricultural
Organization of the United Nations.
Goes, F. and Davidson, P., eds. (2002) Recent sightings July to
December 2002. Cambodia Bird News 10: 47-54.
Kong Kim Sreng and Tan Setha (2002) A wildlife survey of Kirirom
National Park, Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Wildlife Conservation
Society.
Net Neath and Tan Setha (eds.) (2001) A wildlife survey of Bokor
National Park, Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Wildlife Conservation
Society Cambodia Program.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-east Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C. (2003) From the Field. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 37: 77-87.
Round, P. D., Gale, G., Pattanaviboool, A., Pierce, A. J., Tokue, K.,
Pobprasert, K., Sankamethawee, W., Warren, Y., Brockelman,
W. Y. and Wohandee, P. (2004) Avian abundance and diversity:
an assessment of monitoring methods for forest birds at the Mo-
singto Long-term Biodiversity Research Plot, Khao Yai National
Park. Unpublished interim report to the Biodiversity Research and
'braining Program of Thailand.
Seng Kim Hout, Pech Bunnat, Poole, C. M., T ordoff, A. W., Davidson,
P. and Delattre, E. (2003) Directory of Important Bird Areas in
Cambodia: key sites for conservation. Phnom Penh: Department of
Forestry and Wildlife, Department of Nature Conservation and
Protection, BirdLife International in Indochina and the Wildlife
Conservation Society Cambodia Program.
Smith, H. M. (1934) The white oriole ofKao Sabap. J. Siam Soc. Nat.
Hist. Suppl. 9: 329.
Steinheimer, F. D., Eames, J. C., Meas Chandamony and Ros Bansok
(2000) Birds. Pp. 87-98 in J. C. Daltry and F. Mombery, eds.
Cardamom Mountains Biodiversity Survey 2000. Cambridge, U.K.:
Fauna and Flora International.
Swan, S. R. and Long, B. L. (2003) Birds. Pp. 41-60 in J. Daltry, ed.
Social and ecological surveys of Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary,
Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia. Unpublished report of the
Cambodia Programme, Fauna & Flora International, and the
Ministry of Environment, Phnom Penh.
Thomas, W. W. and Poole, C. M. (2003) An annotated list of the birds
of Cambodia from 1859 to 1970. Forktail 19: 103-127.
John D. Pilgrim, Global Conservation Fund, Conservation International, 1919 M Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC
20036, U.S.A. Current address: BirdLife International in Indochina, 4/209 Doi Can Street, Hanoi, Vietnam. Email:
pilgrim@birdlife. netnam. vn
Andrew J. Pierce, King MongkuP s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand. Email: andrew@pdti.kmutt. ac.th
128
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Abundance of birds in different habitats in Buxa
Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India
S. SIVAKUMAR, JEEJO VARGHESE andVIBHU PRAKASH
Buxa Tiger Reserve (26°30-55'N 89°20-55'E) is located
in the north-eastern corner of Jalpaiguri district, West
Bengal. It covers an area of 760 km-, with a core area of
385 km- and a buffer zone 375 km2. The northern and
eastern boundaries of the reserve border Bhutan and
Assam respectively. The western and southern boundaries
are bordered by tea gardens and agricultural fields (Fig.
1 ) . Biogeographically, the reserve lies in two major zones:
the Central Himalayas and Gangetic Plains. Most of the
area of the reserve lies in plains, and only the northern
tracts are hilly. The elevation ranges from 60 to 1,750 m.
There are 37 villages inside the reserve and 33 tea gardens
on the fringes. The habitat is primarily tropical moist-
deciduous forest dominated by sal Shorea robusta. In
addition, evergreen, semi-evergreen and riverine forest,
scrub and grasslands are found, along with plantations of
sal, teak Tectona grandis, jarul Lagerstroemia reginae , and
mixed plantations of native trees. The temperature range
is typically 12-32°C and the average annual rainfall is
c.4,100 mm.
Previous authors have reported on birds in the reserve
(e.g. Stevens 1923-1925, Inglis 1952-1969), with Allen
et al. (1996) recording a total of 227 species and listing
359 species known from the reserve. We carried out a
systematic study during May 2000-July 200 1 to determine
the species richness and abundance in different habitats.
Our observations of threatened species and the results of
Km
Figure 1. Map of Buxa Tiger Reserve showing location of transects.
waterbird surveys in the reserve have been published
elsewhere (Sivakumar 2003, Sivakumar and Prakash
2004).
METHODS
A total of 12 line transects (Caughley 1977), each 1 km
long, were used to survey the avifauna: three in plantations
of teak (T2 and T9) and sal (Tl), three in semi-evergreen
forest (T3, T5 and T8), two in hill forest (Tl 1 and T12)
and one each in scrub (T4), riverine forest (110), forest
around a village (T7) and mixed plantation with natural
forest (T6). The locations of the transects are marked in
Fig. 1 and further details are given elsewhere (Prakash et
al. 2001). Two observers covered each transect in
approximately one hour by walking slowly and counting
birds observed on both sides of the transect. Transects
were started 30 minutes after sunrise and each transect
was walked twice a month i.e. 28 times in total. For all
observations, the species, number of individuals, distance
from observer, height, behaviour and association with
other species were noted. Population densities were
calculated as total number of individuals divided by
transect length x mean perpendicular distance of
observations (Burnham et al. 1980).
In addition, a 45-km transect was driven every two
weeks during the study period from Damanpur to Checko
via Panijora, Pambubusti, Rajabhathkawa, Santrabari,
Jainty and ‘23rd mile tower’. A 50 m band on each side
of the transect was searched, with one person observing
each side from a slow-moving (20km/h) jeep. This survey
method is useful for large conspicuous birds that occur in
low densities (Sale and Berkmuller 1988).
RESULTS
A total of 284 species were recorded in Buxa Tiger Reserve
during the study period, of which 144 species were
recorded during the transects (Appendix 1). Twenty-two
species were newly recorded for the reserve (Appendix
2). Species richness was highest in semi-evergreen forest
and lowest in teak plantations (Table 1). Overall bird
population densities were highest in scrub, followed by
village-edge forest (Table 1 ), and ranged from 0.2 to 658
birds/km2 (see Appendix), with 73% of species occurring
at densities < 1 0 birds/km2 (Fig. 2) . The density of a number
of raptor species was calculated from the results of the
road transects (Table 2).
Five threatened and two Near Threatened species were
recorded: Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus
(Vulnerable), White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis
(Critically Endangered), Slender-billed Vulture Gyps
tenuirostris (Critically Endangered), Chestnut-breasted
Partridge Arborophila mandellii (Vulnerable), Rufous-
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
129
Table 1. Species richness and overall bird population densities in different habitats of Buxa Tiger Reserve.
90
0.1-1 1.1-2 2.1-5 5.1-10 10.1- 20.1- 50.1- >100
20 50 100
Birds/km2
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of bird species densities in Buxa
Tiger Reserve.
Table 2. Density of raptors recorded from road- transects in Buxa
Tiger Reserve.
necked HombiW Aceros nipalensis (Vulnerable) Ferruginous
Pochard Aythya nyroca (Near Threatened) and Great
Hornbill Baceros bicomis (Near Threatened). Details of
the observation have been published elsewhere (Sivakumar
2003). We did not record Black-necked Crane Grus
nigricollis or Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa (both
Vulnerable) which are known from the reserve (Sanyal
1995, Allen et al. 1996).
DISCUSSION
Higher species diversity was found in semi-evergreen
forest and mixed plantations than in monoculture
plantations, presumably because the simpler structure of
the latter provides fewer ecological niches, food types and
variety of nest sites (Steyn 1977, Woinarski 1979, Evans
1992). The highest overall bird population densities were
recorded in scrub and village-edge forest. This was likely
to have been partly a result of the greater visibility in
such habitats, and partly because agricultural activities
such as ploughing attracted large numbers of egrets and
mynas. Eighty-six percent of species in the present
study had densities lower than 20 birds/km2, which is
comparable with data from an Amazonian rainforest
(Thiollay 1994). Some species had exceptionally
high densities, e.g. Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis (266
birds/km2) and Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer (659
birds/km2) . Thiollay ( 1 994) also mentioned that abundant
species commonly reach up to 200 pairs/km2 i.e. 400
birds/km2.
Allen et al. (1996) recorded 227 species in the reserve
and listed a total of 359 species known from it. Of the
species recorded by Allen et al. (1996), we missed 82
species. These mostly occur at higher altitudes; practical
difficulties prevented us from carrying out transects above
1,000 m. We recorded an additional 119 species that
Allen etal. (1996) did not record, including 22 that were
also not recorded by previous workers. Development of
monoculture plantations, tea gardens, tree cutting,
firewood collection, grass cutting, fires and cattle grazing
are some of the threats to birds in Buxa Tiger Reserve
(Prakash et al. 2001).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We express our sincere thanks to the Forest Department, West Bengal,
for financial support and cooperation, Ranjit Manakadan for providing
computer facilities and continuous encouragement, and Elbert Sangma,
Dileep Roy and Raja Sen for their help.
REFERENCES
Allen, D., Anderton, J. and Kazmierczak, K. (1996) Report on an
ornithological visit to Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India, 1 7
February to 6 March 1992. Forktail 12: 47-64.
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., and Laake, J. L. (1980) Estimation
of density from line transect sampling of biological populations.
Wildlife Monograph 72: 1-202.
Caughley, G. (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. New York: Wiley
and Sons.
Evans, J. ( 1 992) Plantation forestry in the tropics. Second edition. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Inglis, C. M. (1952-1969) Birds of the duars. J. Bengal Nat. Hist. Soc.
25: 121-127, 164-169, 196-200; 26: 1-8, 47-56, 93-99, 149-
156; 27: 9-12, 55-58, 83-95, 129-155; 28: 18-51, 102-1 15, 153-
161; 29: 16-25, 88-94, 150-160; 30: 35M2, 81-97, 166-181; 31:
14-32, 49-60; 32: 1-9, 69-73; 33: 121-123, 181-184; 34: 1-4,
85-87; 35: 1-5, 49-63.
130
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
131
132
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
133
Species
w
u
CJ
o
c
o
S a
•*-»
c
CO
c
It
It
u
be
u
<L>
>
<U
E
<U
C/3 «
3
U
u
C/3
C
.2
ti *-*
CO a
t; «
c v
CO o
*3 '**
•g 2
* s
§ c
<u
be
*0
0)
i
a>
be
co
a>
Vi
<2
O
.2
*v
1)
2
APPENDIX 2
Bird species newly recorded for Buxa Tiger Reserve
Barred Buttonquail Tumix suscitator
SPOT-BILLED Duck Anas poecilorhyncha
Pale-headed Woodpecker Gednulus grantia
Stripe-breasted Woodpecker Dendrocopos atratus
Ruddy Kingfisher Halcyon coromanda
Common Coot Fulica atra
Eurasian Griffon Gyps fulvus
Eastern Marsh Harrier Circus ( aeruginosus) spilonotus
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
Little Egret Egretta garzetta
Malayan Night Heron Gorsachius melanolophus
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus
Asian OPENBiLLHwasrowws oscitans
Black-naped Oriole Oriolus chinensis
Chestnut-bellied Nuthatch Sitta castanea
SPOTTED LaUGHINGTHRUSH Garrulax ocellatus
Red-billed Leiothrix Leiothrix lutea
Olive-backed Pipit Ambus hodgsoni
Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus
Scaly-breasted Munia Lonchura punctulata
Little Bunting Emberiza pusilla
Nesting ecology of Cattle Egrets and Little Egrets in
Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India
HILALUDDIN, AISHA SULTANA, AFIFULLAH KHAN, H. S. A.YAHYA and RAHUL KAUL
Heron species vary in their habitat preferences, diet and
behaviour, but they have similar fundamental
requirements for nesting (Hafner 2000). A good nesting
site generally provides protection against predators, offers
adequate stability and materials to support and construct
the nest, and is located near adequate feeding areas
(Thompson 1977, Beaver etal. 1980, Hafner and Britton
1983, Gibbs et al. 1987, Hafner et al. 1987, Hafner and
Fasola 1992). Nest-site parameters also influence hatching
success (Ludwig et al. 1994, Kazantzidis et al. 1997,
Hilaluddinpra/. 2003) and fledging success (Buckley and
Buckley 1980).
Studies of nest-site selection by Cattle Egret Bubulcus
ibis and Little Egret Egretta garzetta have been previously
conducted in subtropical North America and in southern
Europe (Telfair 1983, Arendt and Arendt 1988,
134
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Kazantzidis et al. 1997), but information on the nesting
ecology of the two species from South and South-East
Asia is lacking. We therefore surveyed egret colonies in
Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India, and examined nesting
ecology of these two species.
METHODS
Study area
The study was carried out at Amroha, J. P. Nagar district,
Uttar Pradesh, India, which is located 131 km north-east
of Delhi at 28°26'-29°26'N 78°04-39'E and at an altitude
of 2 1 3 m. Annual rainfall during 200 1 totalled 1,210 mm.
The area falls within a complex wetland system formed by
the Ganges with its tributaries (Ban, Gagan, Y agad, Bagad,
Kurla, Sotra and Krishna). The mean size of wetlands
around colonies was 1.2 ha (range: 0.4-5 ha).
Data collection
We defined a nesting colony as a site with aggregations of
>5 nests where nesting individuals were sufficiently close
to be able to communicate vocally and visually to
neighbouring individuals (Gochfeld 1980). Most nesting
colonies in the study area were more than 1 km apart. An
active nest was defined as one that contained either an egg
or a nestling.
We collected data on 42 active nesting colonies in 1 58
nesting trees between 15 June and 30 August 2001. We
counted the total number of active nests of each egret
species in each nesting tree following the Tally Count
Method (Copper et al. 1 982) . We measured the distance
of each nesting tree from the nearest wetland, classifying
these as: (1) open-water wetland (dominated by open
water with occasional trees); (2) emergent wetland
(dominated by persistent or non-persistent emergent
vegetation); and (3) unconsolidated bottom marshland
(largely unvegetated and underlain by gravel, mud or
organic material) . W e defined man-made habitats around
nesting trees as: (1) agriculture; (2) residential areas; (3)
panchayat (local council) lands for common resource
properties; (4) mango orchards; (5) religious sites
(temples, mosques and graveyards); (6) government
premises (institutions, offices and tube-wells); and (7)
social forestry plantations along highways.
Nest trees were identified to the species level and were
measured for the following structural features: bole height;
girth at breast height (gbh); canopy diameter; and canopy
height. The canopy shape of each tree was also recorded.
Canopy spread (i.e. horizontal area covered by the canopy)
was calculated following Muller-Dombois and Ellenberg
(1974). Canopy volume (for calculating nest density) was
calculated using standard algebraic formulas for cones,
cylinders and half spheroids, depending upon the shape
of the canopy, following Hilaluddin et al. (2005). We
were unable to measure the structural variables of two
nest trees owing to field conditions, so we discarded nests
in these trees from most analyses.
We visually divided the canopy of each nesting tree
vertically into three approximately equal parts (upper,
middle and lower) and horizontally into two equal halves
(inner and outer) from the centre point of the tree canopy.
Thus, each tree was divided into six canopy sectors. The
number of nests of each egret species was counted
separately in each sector.
Data analysis
We compared the distance of colonies to different wetland
types using an ANOVA. We used t-tests to compare the
height of nests of each species, and to compare their
distance from the ground and to the tree-top. We used a
one-way ANOVA to analyse the distribution of nests in
different canopy sectors.
We used separate ANOVAs to investigate whether
habitat type or nearest wetland type affected the density
of nests in nesting trees for both species separately and
combined. We also tested which macro-habitat scale
factors affected nest-density using a stepwise Discriminant
Factor Analysis (DFA) , with nest density as the dependent
variable and distance to wetland, wetland area, wetland
type, type of man-made structures in the vicinity, type of
human disturbance (poaching, use of fire-crackers and/
or drum-beating to deliberately scare away egrets, tree
lopping, egg collection and nest destruction) as factors.
To test which micro-habitat scale factors affected nest-
density, we used a stepwise multiple regression with nest
density as the dependent variable and girth at breast height,
bole height, canopy spread, canopy height, canopy volume
and tree height as factors.
All non-normal variables were transformed
appropriately, following Sokal and Rohlf (1995), prior to
analysis. Means ± 1 standard error are presented
throughout.
RESULTS
Location of nesting colonies
We recorded 7,059 active nests (3,8 1 2 Cattle Egret nests,
3,247 Little Egret nests) in 42 colonies. Most colonies
(64.3%) contained nests of both species, with 23.8%
comprising only Little Egrets, and 1 1 .9% comprising only
Cattle Egrets. The nests of each species tended to be
clustered together, although we did not quantify this.
The mean number of nests per colony was 77±13 for
Little Egrets, 91 ±21 for Cattle Egrets, and 168±33 for
both species combined.
Most nesting colonies were located in residential areas
(37.3%), followed by religious places (16.4%),
government premises (1 5.2%), mango orchards (12.5%),
panchayat lands (6.4%), plantations along highways
(6.4%) and agricultural areas (5.8%). The majority
(65%) of nesting trees were located <250 m from the
nearest wetland, 34% were at a distance of 251-500 m
and only 1% were >500 m. Nesting colonies were
located significantly closer to open water wetlands
(mean distance = 209±29 m) and emergent wetlands
(232±57 m) than consolidated bottom marshlands
(6521106 m; E, |57=49.44, E<0.0001; Scheffe post-
hoc tests).
Location of nests
The majority of nests (43.8%) of both species were located
in trees of Ficus spp . , followed by Dalbergia sissoo (12.5%),
Mangifera indica (1 1.3 %),Azadirachta indica (11 .3%) and
Eucalyptus spp. (5%). The remaining nests were located
in trees of Acacia nilotica,Albizia lebbek, Averrhoe carambola,
Bombax ceiba, Delonix regia , Manlkara hexandraroxburgi,
Melia azadirach, Mimusops elengi, Pithecellobium dulce,
Syzygium cumini , Tamarindus indica and Ziziphus
mauritiana.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
135
There was no difference between the mean height of
nesting trees for Cattle Egrets (ll.l±3.5m,N=91) and
Little Egrets (1 0±3.4 m, N= 1 0 1 ; rigo=0.62, NS) . Nests of
both species were sited above the middle of the tree, having
significantly greater mean distances from the ground than
from the top of the tree (Cattle Egret: rg[=9.51, P< 0.001;
Little Egret: r =9.96, P<0.00 1 ). The number of nests of
both species differed significantly between different
canopy sectors (ANOVA: Cattle Egret: F..u =36.27,
P<0.0001; Little Egret: F5600=22.34, P<0.0001), with
significantly more nests in the inner-upper canopy sector
for both species (Scheffe post-hoc tests).
Nest densities
On average, there were 0.016±0.004 Cattle Egret
nests/m5 of canopy volume and 0.02410.001 Little Egret
nests/m3, with no significant difference between the two
species (r316=l .24, P=0.22).
The density of nests of each species separately and
combined varied significantly between nesting trees in
different man-made habitats (Table 1). Nest densities
were highest in nesting trees located in religious sites (both
species), agricultural areas (Cattle Egret) and plantations
(Little Egret) . The nest density of each species separately
and combined did not vary significantly across various
wetland types (Table 2). The distance to the nearest
wetland had a significant effect on density of nests in
nesting trees (Discriminant Function Analysis; Wilks’
Lambda = 0.96, Fl lss=7.54, canonical discriminant
function coefficient = 0.73, P<0.007). No othervariables
were significant predictors of nest density.
Table 1. Density of nests of Cattle and Little Egrets in nesting trees
(nests/m3 of canopy volume) in different man-made habitat types.
At the micro-habitat scale, stepwise multiple linear
regression models showed that canopy spread and canopy
volume together explained 68% and 63% of the variation
in nest density for Cattle Egret and Little Egret
respectively. Canopy spread alone was found to be most
important, explaining 48% of the variation in Cattle Egret
nest densities (r=0.6, F_g,= 16.5, M.R.=0.4, P<0.001),
and 41.0% of the variation in Little Egret nest densities
(r =0.4, F =5.7, M.R.=0.6, F<0. 001).
DISCUSSION
At the macro-habitat level, the proximity of wetland areas
appeared to be the primary factor affecting the location of
nesting colonies of Cattle Egrets and Little Egrets, with
nearly all colonies located <500 m from a wetland, and
two-thirds located <250 m. Presumably, invertebrate and
small vertebrate fauna in and around these wetlands
provide important food resources for the rearing of young,
with colonies situated near wetlands providing efficient
access to foraging resources (Gibbs and Kinkel 1 997) . Of
all man-made habitat types, residential areas contained
the largest proportion of colonies of Cattle and Little
Egrets, despite the fact that people often disturb and harm
these birds because of the smell of droppings and rotting
food scraps that fall from nests.
The majority of nests were located in Ficus spp. trees.
With their relatively large canopy spread and great height,
these trees probably reduce nest visibility to potential
predators (e.g. birds of prey, domestic cats) from both the
top of the tree and the ground. Furthermore, the well-
buttressed trunks and relatively strong branches and twigs
of these trees may be better at supporting the weight of
large numbers of nests and their contents.
Where different heron species nest together in colonies,
the different species often stratify the placement of their
nests vertically, with the largest species nesting highest and
the smallest nesting lowest (Burger 1982). However, our
data did not show any significant difference in nest height
for Cattle and Little Egrets at Amroha, perhaps because the
two species have approximately equal body sizes.
Our results differ from those of a study in T exas, where
Cattle Egrets nest in tall herbs, shrubs or small trees, or
even on the ground where no nest sites are available in
higher vegetation in densely populated colonies (Telfair
1983, 1994). Furthermore, the average height of nesting
trees in Amroha ( 1 0- 1 1 m for the two species) was greater
than in Texas (6-9 m: Telfair 1983) or in another study
of Little Egrets in Macedonia (6.7 m: Kazantzidis et al.
1997). Differences in available nesting habitat influences
nest-site choice in different locations (Arendt and Arendt
1988, Baxer 1994). Average colony size in Amroha (171
nests of both species combined) were smaller than in
Texas (mean of 750 nests of Cattle Egret, Great Egret
Casmerodius albus , Snowy Egret Egretta thula, Little Blue
Heron Egretta caeridea and Black-crowned Night Heron
Nycticorax nycticorax combined: Telfair etal. 2002), South
Dakota (mean of 269 nests of Cattle Egret, Snowy Egret
nests. Black-crowned Night Heron nests and Little Blue
Heron combined: Naugle et al. 1996) and Greece (292-
422 nests of Little Egret, 333-647 nests of Black-crowned
Night Heron: Kazantzidis etal. 1 997) . We cannot compare
our estimates of nest density with those in these studies,
because we calculated nest density in three-dimensional
136
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
space, whereas in other studies herons show a relatively
uniform and approximately uni-layered nest placement
within the vegetation, and nest density is calculated in
two dimensions (e.g. Telfair 1983).
Breeding birds require safe nesting sites as well as
sufficient quantity and quality of foraging habitat
(Kallander 1974, Yom-Tov 1974, Bronssen and Jansson
1980, Drent and Daan 1980, Smith et al. 1980, Ewald
and Rohwar 1982). Therefore, conservation efforts need
to focus not only on protection of nesting colonies, but
also large-scale preservation of adjacent foraging habitat.
In Amroha, public awareness and education programmes
are needed to protect nesting trees and minimise
disturbance in order to ensure long-term persistence of
waterbirds in general, and ardeids in particular.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank A. R. Rahmani and G. Shabuddin for critically commenting
on an early draft. Eben Goodale also provided extremely useful comments.
Mayur Textile Traders provided logistic support during fieldwork.
REFERENCES
Arendt, J. W. and Arendt, I. A. (1988) Aspects of the breeding biology
of the Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis in Montserrat, West Indies and its
impact on the nest vegetation. Waterbirds 1 1: 72-84.
Baxer, G. S. (1994) The influence of synchronous breeding natal tree
position and rainfall on egret nesting success. Waterbirds 17: 120-129.
Beaver, D. L., Osborn, R. C. and Custer, T. W. (1980) Nest site and
colony characteristics of wading birds in selected Atlantic coast
colonies. Wilson Bull. 92: 200-220.
Bronssen, A. and Jansson, C. (1980) Effects of food addition to Willow
Tit Pams montanus and Crested Tit P. cristatus at the time of breeding.
Omis Scand. 11: 173-178.
Buckley, F. G. and Buckley, P. A. (1980) Habitat selection and marine
birds. Pp. 69-1 12inJ. Burger, B. L. OllaandH. E. Winn, eds. Behavior
of marine animals: marine birds. Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press.
Burger, J. ( 1 982) The role of reproductive success in colony site selection
and abandonment in Black Skimmers Rynchops niger. Auk 99: 1 09-
115.
Copper, J., Brooke, R. K., Shelton, P. A. and Crawford, R. J. M (1982)
Distribution, population size and conservation of the Cape
Cormorant Phalacrocorax capensis. Fish. Bull. 16: 121-143.
Drent, H. andDann, S. (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments
in avian breeding. Ardea 68: 225-252.
Ewald, P. W. and Rohwer, S. (1982) Effect of supplemental feeding on
timing of breeding, clutch-size and polygyne in Red-winged
Blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus. J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 429-450.
Gibbs, J. P. and Kinkel, L. K. (1997) Determinants of the size and
location of Great Blue Heron colonies. Waterbirds 20: 1-7.
Gibbs, J. P., Woodward, S., Hunter, M. L. and Hutchinson, A. E.
(1987) Determinants of Great Blue Heron colony distribution in
coastal Maine. Auk 104: 38-47.
Gochfeld, M. (1980). Mechanisms and adaptive value of reproductive
synchrony in colonial seabirds. Pp. 207-270 in J. Burger, B. L. Olla
and H. E. Winn, eds. Behavior of marine animals: marine birds. Vol.
4. New York: Plenum Press.
Hafner, H. (2000) Heron nest site conservation. Pp. 201-215 in A. J.
KushlanandH. Hafner, eds. Heron conservation. San Diego, U.S. A.:
Academic Press.
Hafner, H. and Britton, R. (1983) Changes of foraging sites by nesting
Litde Egrets Egretta garzetta L. in relation to food supply. Waterbirds
6: 24-30.
Hafner, H. and Fasola, M. (1992) The relationship between feeding
habitat and colonial nesting Ardeidae. Pp. 194-201 in D. A. Scott,
ed. Managing Mediterranean wetland and their birds. Slimbridge,
U.K.: International Wetland Research Bureau. .
Hafner, H., Dugan, P. J. and Boy, V. (1987) Herons and wetlands in the
Mediterranean: development of indices of quality assessment and
management of Mediterranean wetland ecosystems. Unpublished
report of the Third Environment Research Program of the
Commission of European Communities.
Hilaluddin, Shah, J. N. and Shawl, T. A. (2003) Nest site selection and
breeding success by Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis and Little Egret Egretta
garzetta in Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India. Waterbirds 26: 444—448.
Hilaluddin, Kaul, R. Hussain M. S., Imam, E., Shah, J. N., Abbasi, F.
and Shawl, T. A. (2005) Status and distribution of breeding Cattle
Egret and Little Egret using new density method in Amroha. Curr.
Set. 88: 1-5.
Kallander, H . ( 1 9 74) Advancement of laying of Great Tits by the provision
of food. Ibis 1 16: 365-367.
Kazantzidis, S., Goutner, V., Pyrovetsi, M. and Sinis, A. (1997)
Comparative nest site selection and breeding success in 2 sympatric
ardeids, Black-crowned Night-heron Nycticorax nycticorax and Litde
Egret Egretta garzetta in the Axios Delta, Macedonia, Greece.
Waterbirds 20: 505-517.
Ludwig, E., Vanicsek, L., Torok, J. and Csorgo, T. (1994) The effect
of nest height on the seasonal pattern of breeding success in Blackbirds
Turdus merula. Ardea 83: 411-418.
Muller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and methods of
vegetation ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Naugle, D. E., Johnson, R. R., Meeks, W. A. and Higgins, K. F. (1996)
Colonization and growth of a mixed species heronry in South Dakota.
Colon. Waterbirds 19: 199-206.
Rodgers, W. A. and Panwar, H. S. (1988) Planning a protected area network
in India. Vols. 1-2. Dehra Dun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.
Smith, J. M. N., Montgomerie, R. D., Taitt, M. J. and Yom-Tov, Y.
(1980) A winter-feeding experiment on an island song sparrow
population. Oecologia 47: 164-170.
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of
statistics in biological research. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Telfair, R. C. II. (1983) The Cattle Egret: a Texas focus and world view.
College Station, Texas, U.S. A.: Texas A & M University.
Telfair, R. C. II. (1994) Cattle Egret ( Bubulcus ibis). No 113. Pp. 32 in
A. Poole and F. Gill, eds. The birds of North America. Philadelphia
and Washington, D . C . : Academy of Natural Resources and American
Ornithologists’ Union.
Telfair, R. C. II, Thompson, B. C. and Tschirhart, L. (2002) Nuisance
heronries in Texas: characteristics and management. Austin, Texas,
U.S. A.: Texas Parks and Wildlife.
Thompson, D. H. (1977) Feeding areas of Great Blue Herons and
Great Egrets within the floodplains of the Upper Mississippi river.
Colon. Waterbirds 2: 202-213.
Yom-Tov, Y. (1974) The effect of food and predation on breeding
density and success, clutch-size and laying of the Crow Corvus corone.
J. Anim. Ecol. 43: 479-498.
Hilaluddin, do WWF -India, 172-B, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India. Email: hilaluddin@yahoo.com
Aisha Sultana, Afifullah Khan, H. S. A. Yahya, Department of Wildlife Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202
002, India.
Rahul Kaul, Wildlife Trust of India, A-220, New Friends Colony, New Delhi 110 011, India.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
137
First record of Wire-tailed Swallow Hirundo smithii
for China, with notes on Alexandrine Parakeet
Psittacula eupatria and Rose-ringed Parakeet
P. krameri
PAUL I. HOLT
Ruili, Dehong county, in extreme south-west Yunnan,
China lies very close to the border with Myanmar and it
has recently become the focus of several birding trips (e.g.
Hornskov 1999, Hornbuckle 2002). Visiting foreign
birders have even found the first records for China of a
number of species, including Black-backed Forktail
Enicurus immaculatus (Jan H. Christensen at Jiele Reservoir
in early 1992 [fide Hornskov 1999] and seen by several
other observers, including PIH, on subsequent visits) and
Rufous-chinned Laughingthrush Gamilax rufogularis (one
on 1 1 March 1999: Dymond and Thompson 2000). I
spent nine days birding around Ruili during 8-16 January
2004, and I was fortunate enough to record the first Wire¬
tailed Swallows Hirundo smithii for China, and two parakeet
species of uncertain origin.
Wire-tailed Swallow
At least five adult Wire-tailed Swallows were seen over the
Zhong Mian river between Wanding and Li Xin, west of
Ruili, at 24°05'N 98°03'E and 785 m, at about 1 0h30 on 1 0
January 2004. Using 10x binoculars and a 30 x telescope,
I watched them, on and off, for about 20 minutes. I knew
that they were not in the standard field guide to the region
(MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000) and suspected that they
were previously unrecorded in China. Consequently I took
some field notes and photographed three of the birds as
they were perched on wires together with Bam H. mstica
and Striated Swallows H. striolata. I was familiar with the
species from experience at numerous sites in India.
The birds were similar to Barn Swallow, but their
noticeably smaller size and daintier appearance with a
distinctive, truncated, square-cut rear end, and
proportionately broader-based (and perhaps shorter) wings
and weaker flight all drew my attention. All five birds had
gleaming white underwing-coverts that contrasted very
sharply with the dark underside of the flight feathers. The
rest of the underparts, including the chin and throat, were
also white and unmarked. A smallish, apparently forward-
tilted chestnut cap was well demarcated from both a bluish
facial mask (extending narrowly through the eye onto the
lores) and from the glossy, rich blue upperparts. The
upperparts from the nape to the rump were noticeably
glossier and bluer than those of Barn Swallow, especially
on the mantle, scapulars and upperwing. A wispy,
filamentous, elongated shaft extended from both of the
outermost tail feathers for a distance of about 1 . 5 times the
basal width of the wings. These streamers were often
difficult to discern in flight but were readily apparent when
the birds perched on overhead wires. All five birds appeared
very similar, although there were slight differences in the
lengths of the tail streamers, perhaps related to differences
between the sexes.
Wire-tailed Swallow is considered to be a rare or
uncommon resident, subject to local movements, in
Myanmar (C. Robson in litt. 2004). It has been recorded
from Bhamo in Kachin state, northern Myanmar (c.50
km from the Chinese border and c.65 km from Ruili)
where Harington (1909-1910) found that it was the
common swallow of the district, although he saw no signs
of nesting.
Alexandrine and Rose-ringed Parakeets
One Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria was seen with
a party of nine Rose-ringed Parakeets P. krameri at Nongmo
Hu (Ruili Lake), at 24°00'N 97°50'E and 770 m at 1 7h45
on 12 January 2004. I was previously familiar with both
species. I observed them with the same optical equipment
as mentioned above, and also photographed them.
The distinctive raucous flight calls of the Alexandrine
Parakeet was the first thing that attracted my attention,
but it was a full two minutes or so before I eventually
located a single bird that was perched, with a Rose-ringed
Parakeet, near the top of a distant stand of tall bamboo.
The two birds remained visible for about five minutes
before both dropped out of sight, and I assumed that they
had gone to roost. They were probably over 800 m away
but, even at this range, using a telescope on up to 60x
magnification, I was able to confirm my initial tentative
identification, obtain a couple of poor images and make
a few rudimentary field notes.
Both species were obviously ‘green-headed parakeets’ .
The Alexandrine was clearly the larger of the two (by
perhaps as much as 15-20%) and had a proportionately
much larger head, relatively broader ‘shoulders’ and a tail
that appeared thicker throughout its length. It also had a
very conspicuous massive red bill. It took me a long time
to confirm the presence of red ‘shoulder-patches’, these
feathers being concealed much of the time by overlapping
scapulars. At this range I was unable to see whether the
Rose-ringed Parakeet had a narrow loral stripe and a black
collar that extended completely around the back of the
neck, and that the Alexandrine Parakeet lacked these
features. However, both were confirmed c.I5 minutes
later when I again heard what I assumed was the same
Alexandrine Parakeet. It was flying towards me and was
now with a group of nine Rose-ringed Parakeets.
Fortunately all ten birds alighted in a tree less than 1 00 m
away. I was able to observe them for a couple of minutes
before they flew off south (presumably to roost). In flight
views the Alexandrine Parakeet’s extensive red lesser-
covert ‘shoulder-patch’ was clearly visible. When the bird
was perched, I confirmed the lack of black on the bird’s
lower mandible. I could also see that the narrow black
stripe that extended from the bird’s chin and curved back
138
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
around the side of the neck was short, and that it did not
extend around the back of the neck as it did on the Rose-
ringed Parakeets. Instead there was a fairly prominent
pinkish hind-collar that was broader than that on the
accompanying Rose-ringed Parakeets.
Alexandrine Parakeet is considered to be a scarce or
locally common resident in Myanmar (except south
Tenasserim) (C. Robson in litt. 2004). It has also been
recorded at Bhamo, where Fea apparently noted it
sometime in 1885-1886 (see Salvadori 1887) and
described it as ‘found generally in numerous small groups’.
There is also a specimen of Alexandrine Parakeet collected
at Bhamo in the Natural History Museum, Tring, U.K.
(S. Schocdel in litt. 2004). Robson {in litt. 2004) considered
Rose-ringed Parakeet to be a locally common resident in
Myanmar (except south Tenasserim) but there appear to
be no historical records of Rose-ringed Parakeet from
Bhamo or elsewhere in Kachin state, although the species
was recently encountered there by van der Ven (2001).
Rose-ringed Parakeet is recorded as a resident in eastern
Myanmar, in the northern Shan States (as are the other
two species) in a distribution list lacking details in Smythies
(1953). The next closest records are to the south-west, in
central Myanmar, from Shwebo (Sagaing Division), where
it was found to be common by Roseveare (1949).
Rose-ringed Parakeet was described by Cheng ( 1987)
as ‘very rare in the wild’ in China; he listed it from Hong
Kong, Macao and Zhuhai in Guangdong. Unfortunately
he did not make it clear whether he regarded these records
as relating to a native or a feral population, but Carey et
al. (2001) noted that ‘in the absence of records in
China away from the Pearl River region, there is little
doubt that the populations in Hong Kong and nearby are
all of captive origin’. The Hong Kong population,
introduced early in the 1990s, remains the only one in
China about which there appears to be any information,
although free-flying birds have also been seen in Macao
in recent years (Liu Yang in litt. 2004). Rose-ringed
Parakeet remains a popular cage bird throughout China,
and it is possible that my Ruili sightings of this and
Alexandrine Parakeet relate to free-flying escaped birds.
This origin is perhaps all the more likely as N. Farrell {in
litt. 2004) reported what were probably the same birds
(‘between eight and ten’) in this area on two dates between
28 January and 4 February 2003, and again ‘about eight’
there around 22 February 2004.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to: Geoff Carey and Jesper Homskov for comments on the
status of these species in China; Craig Robson and Tim Inskipp for
equally knowledgeable, well-informed comments on the species’s status
elsewhere in South-East Asia; and Simon Schoedel, Liu Yang and
Norm Farrell for additional information.
REFERENCES
Cheng, Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
Dymond, N. and Thompson, P. (2000) Rufous-chinned
Laughingthrush Gamilax rufogularis: a new species for China.
Forktail 16: 183.
Harington, H. H. (1909-1910) A list of the birds of the Bhamo District
of Upper Burma. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 19: 107-128, 299-
313.
Hornbuckle, J. (2002) Birding in Yunnan, Southwest China: 8-31
March 2002. Unpublished internet report.
Hornskov, J. (1999). Birds seen in Western Yunnan, China.
Unpublished internet report.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps. K. (2000). A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robson, C. (2000) . A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Roseveare, W. L. (1949) Notes on birds of the irrigated area of Shwebo
District, Burma. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 48: 515-534, 729-749.
Salvadori, T. (1887) Viaggio di L. Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine, 1.
Uccelli raccolti nella Birmania Superiore ( 1885-1 886). Ann. Mus.
Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova (2a)4: 568-617.
Smythies, B. E. (1953) The birds of Burma. Second edition. Edinburgh:
Oliver and Boyd.
van der Ven, J. (2001) Myanmar expedition, 1999-2000 report: second
expedition, December 2000/January 2001. Unpublished report.
Pauli. Holt, New Laund Farm, Greenhead Lane, Fence, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 9DU, U.K. Email: piholt@hotmail.com
Cooperative provisioning of nestlings in the White-
crested Laughingthrush Garrulax leucolophus
PHILIP D. ROUND
Most species of laughingthrush (Garrulacinae) are strongly
social birds and some have long been suspected to be
cooperative breeders, although none was identified as such
in a recent review by Ligon and Burt (2004). Unlike some
confirmed social breeders (e.g. T/mio/des babblers, found in
open, arid or semi-arid habitats, and relatively easily
observed), laughingthrush.es are usually shy denizens of
dense, moist forest which renders detailed observation
difficult. I present here the results of brief and opportunistic
observations of a White-crested Laughingthrush Garrulax
leucolophus nest in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary,
Uthai Thani province, Western Thailand ( 1 5°36TSI 99° 1 6T),
which indicate that the species is a cooperative breeder.
I was watching at least five White-crested
Laughingthrushes in relatively open deciduous woodland
at the sanctuary headquarters on the afternoon of 12
August 2005, when one member of the group flew in to
a large, untidy cup-nest that I had not previously noticed.
The nest was situated in a small leafy tree, close to the
trunk, at a height of about 5 m, and contained two well-
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
139
grown nestlings. Because of the proximity of buildings
and frequent human foot traffic, the laughingthrushes were
relatively habituated to people and I was able to count at
least five birds feeding mainly on the ground within a 30
m radius of the nest. The area around the nest encompassed
open woodland, from which the underbrush had been
removed, close to houses, as well as some denser forest
with tangled undergrowth in a steep-sided gully.
I watched the nest without interruption from 1 4h53 to
15h28 at a range of about 20 m. At 15h08, three birds
came to the nest tree and two of them delivered food in
quick succession, while the third individual perched less
than 0.5 m from the nest. At 1 5h20, two individuals again
visited the nest and fed the young, while a third bird
perched nearby with a spider in its bill. However, this bird
did not visit the nest and probably consumed the spider
itself. After dark (19h40) I checked the nest by flashlight
from a range of about 15 m, and with the aid of binoculars
could see an adult brooding the young.
On the following morning I watched the nest from
06h 1 3 to 07h00, during which period the adults paid it a
total of 15 separate visits. From 06hl9 to 06h29, there
were no fewer than eight visits to feed the nestlings
(including three feeds by three different individuals within
one minute). A fourth individual that fed the young at
06h 1 7, and again at 06h33, was individually recognisable
as it had a yellow gape-spot on the right side. In addition,
because the habitat was rather open, most birds could be
located in view simultaneously, aiding differentiation of
individuals. The usual pattern was for one bird to feed the
young, and then remain on the nest until another bird
came in and displaced it. At least four different individuals
in the group provisioned the young.
The young were already well-grown, with partly grown
wing and tail feathers, a black-and-white face pattern,
and rufous upperparts similar to the adult pattern . On the
morning of 1 3 August, one of the nestlings clambered out
of the nest and perched c.20 cm above it, flapping its
wings for 20-30 seconds before returning to the nest.
When I checked the nest that evening, it was empty and
the young were presumed to have fledged.
In addition to the two visits (out of six) on 12 August
when no food was delivered to the chicks, the 1 5 visits on
the following day also included three cases when an adult
perched close to the nest but did not feed the young. Two
of these visits involved the individual with the yellow gape-
spot. In one of these, the bird came to the nest without
food, while in the other it consumed the food itself. Such
behaviours (adults either coming in to the nest without
food or consuming the food themselves) are well known
among other birds that have nest-helpers. Boland et al.
(1997) termed the behaviour ‘deceptive helping’ and
thought it was a form of advertisement that individuals
used to enhance their status within the group, perhaps
increasing their future likelihood of acquiring a mate
(Putland 2001). However, Canestrari et al. (2002)
observed these behaviours, which they termed ‘false
feeding’, in instances when no other individuals were
present as onlookers, and also at unassisted nests (those
that lacked helpers). Since breeding females exhibited
this behaviour more often than other group members,
Canestrari et al. (2002) suggested that deception was
unlikely to be involved, and that the decision to provision
the chicks represented a trade-off between the chicks’
hunger and that of the provisioning adult.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Kihoko Tokue and Andrew Pierce for their comments on this
manuscript.
REFERENCES
Boland, C. R. J., Heinshohn, R. and Cockburn, A. (1997) Deception
by helpers in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs and its
experimental manipulation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 251-156.
Canestrari, D., Marcos, J. M. and Baglione V. (2002) False feedings
at the nests of Carrion Crows Corvus corone corone. Behav. Ecol.
Sociobiol. 55: 477-483.
Ligon, J. D. and Burt, D. B. (2004) Evolutionary origins. Pp. 5-34 in
W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson, eds. Ecology and evolution of
cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, U.K.
Putland, D. (2001) Has sexual selection been overlooked in the study
of avian helping behaviour? Anim. Behav. 62: 811-814.
Philip D. Round, Department of Biology , Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 1 0400, Thailand.
Email: pdround@ksc. th. com
Nesting of the Scarlet-breasted Fruit Dove
Ptilinopus bernsteinii
PETER S. LANSLEY and ROBERT F. FARNES
In September 2005, we found an active nest of the Scarlet¬
breasted Fruit Dove Ptilinopus bernsteinii at a site not far
from Kali Batu Putih near Sidangoli, Halmahera,
Indonesia, while searching for endemic bird species in the
area. Scarlet-breasted Fruit Dove is a medium-sized,
sexually dimorphic fruit dove endemic to Halmahera and
its satellite islands of Bacan, Ternate and Obi, in the
Moluccas group of eastern Indonesia (White and Bruce
1986, Coates and Bishop 1997).
Over several days we birded a narrow logging track
leading north from a site known locally as ‘Gunung Jen’,
12 km by road east of Sidangoli at c.0°55'N 127°34,E.
The site was a remnant of selectively logged primary forest
at c.400 m. On 1 0 September, we flushed a smallish pigeon
140
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
from the vicinity of a spiny rattan palm (family Palmae,
genus unidentified) which was partly overhanging the
logging track. Over the next few days we flushed this or
another bird from much the same location almost daily.
During this time RFF had sufficiently good views to
identify the species as Scarlet-breasted Fruit Dove.
Sometimes the bird appeared to have a pale head and at
others, more uniformly green, so we deduced that we
had flushed both male and female birds. Only one bird
was flushed each time. The birds were apparently
incubating, with male and female sharing these duties.
We had several other sightings of this species during our
stay in the area.
On the morning of 1 5 September, PSL found the nest
itself. It was located 2.5 m above the ground on the apex
of a rattan palm frond directly overhanging the track. It
was constructed from slender twigs that measured about
2 mm in diameter, forming a scanty oval-shaped platform
of about 15x10x4 cm. One white egg was clearly visible
from the underside of the nest.
Breeding activity by other species was taking place at
the time of our visit, e.g. a Paradise-crow Lycocorax
pyrrhopterus was seen carrying nest material and Goliath
Coucal Centropus goliath was seen with fledged young.
There would appear to be only three previously
documented nest records of Scarlet-breasted Fruit Dove,
all of which date from 1931 (Heinrich 1956). Of these, one
with a nestling was in April and two with eggs were in June
of the same year ( contra del Hoyo etal. [1997], who stated
July). Two of the nests were located in ferns and the other
in a small tree, low to the ground. Standard family
monographs (e.g. Goodwin 1983, Gibbs et al. 2001) and
del Hoyo et al. (1997) quote only the records presented in
Heinrich (1956). Searches in other publications and
enquiries among experts on Indonesian birds have turned
up only one other recent record of a nest of this species. P.
Morris {in litt. 2005) found a female of this species incubating
a single egg in a flimsy nest c. 1 m off the ground on a palm
frond in the Kali Batu Putih area in August 1996. This
record and our own extend the known breeding season to
September, show that nests may be placed on rattan palm
fronds, and indicate that both sexes share incubation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Pete Morris for permitting us to include details of his
observations. Inga Mau kindly translated relevant excerpts of the
Heinrich article from German. We also wish to thank Nick Brickie, Ed
Colijn, Ben King, Frank Lambert, Richard Noske and Colin Trainor
for their responses to our enquiries.
REFERENCES
Coates, B. J., and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland, Australia: Dove Publications.
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E., and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves: a guide
to the pigeons and doves of the world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.:
Pica Press.
Goodwin, D. (1983) Pigeons and doves of the world. Third edition.
Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.: Cornell University Press.
Heinrich, G. (1956) Biologische Aufzeichnungen iiber Vogel von
Halmahera und Batjan [‘Biological records about birds of
Halmahera and Batjan’]. J. Orn. 97(1): 31-40.
del Hoyo, J, Elliott, A. D. and Sargatal, J., eds (1997) Handbook of the
birds of the world. Volume 4: sandgrouse to cuckoos. Barcelona, Spain:
Lynx Edicions.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) Birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia ) . London: British
Ornithologists Union. B.O.U. Checklist no. 7.
Peter S. Lansley, 4/ 10 Bloom Street, Frankston, Victoria 3199 Australia. Email: plansley@ecologicalresearch.com.au
Robert F. Fames, 616 Mount Clay Road, Hey wood, Victoria 3304 Australia. Email: rfames@hotkey.net.au
Ornithological surveys of two reserves in
Guangxi province, China, 2004-2005
MARK B. ROBBINS, A. TOWNSEND PETERSON, ARPAD NYARI, GUOJUN CHEN
and TRISTAN J. DAVIS
INTRODUCTION
Human impacts on natural landscapes of South-East Asia
have been intense for thousands of years, but particularly
so in south-eastern China and Vietnam during the past 50
years. This subregion is heavily populated and almost all
lowland forests have been cleared. Areas with relief are
highly disturbed, with virtually all forest being secondary
(MacKinnon 1997, personal observations). Recently,
reserves have been established to protect remnants of this
formerly continuous swathe of tropical and subtropical
evergreen forest that once extended from the southern
China coast south to northern Vietnam east of the
Red River.
In September-October 2004 and April-May 2005,
we surveyed parts of two recently established reserves in
southern Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People’s
Republic of China (henceforth called Guangxi).
The following ornithological results are part of a multi¬
year, multi-disciplinary survey of birds, reptiles,
amphibians, mammals, and associated parasites across
southern China.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
141
STUDY AREAS AND METHODS
Locations of the two study sites are indicated in Fig. 1 .
Diding Headwater Forest Nature Preserve
(23°07T2"N 1 05°57'36"E; hereafter referred to as Diding) .
We established a camp at c. 1,000 m, c.30 km north of the
Vietnam border. This area was surveyed by ATP, AN and
GC from 18 September to 9 October 2004. The terrain
was rugged, with steep slopes. The base camp was in a deep
valley with a rapid stream in secondary forest with a closed
canopy and some evidence of old banana cultivations.
Ridgetop forests were more intact, with many large trees.
The evergreen forest canopy, 20-30 m high along ridges,
with emergent trees that occasionally reached 50 m, was
uneven as a result of the topography. Forest at all elevations
had been selectively logged, with few dead trees either
standing or on the forest floor. Elevations surveyed ranged
fromc.900 m (valley bottom) to 1,400 m (ridgetop). Mist-
net effort included 373 net-days for nets set explicitly for
birds (i.e., parallel to trails, not fully extended vertically),
plus 687 net-days for nets set for bats (i.e., frequently
crossing trails and streams, fully extended vertically). All
nets at this site were left open day and night, so netting
effort totalled 14,840 daytime hours and 10,600 night¬
time hours.
To protect the watershed for the region, Diding
Headwater Forest Nature Preserve was designated as a
county park in 1980 or 1986 (we were unable to determine
which date is correct), and was upgraded to a provincial
park in 2002 (Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden 2003a) .
The size of the park appears to bee. 8. 6 km2 (there is some
Figure 1. Location of the two sites surveyed in 2004 (Diding Headwater
Forest Nature Preserve) and 2005 (Shiwandashan National Nature
Preserve) . Areas of light grey correspond to elevations of 500-2,000 m,
whereas dark grey areas represent altitudes above 2000 m.
uncertainty: Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden 2003a) .
The reserve ranges from c. 780 mto 1,441 m. The geology
is dominated by granite and sandy shale (Guangxi Forestry
Survey and Planning Institute 2002), and the surrounding
mountains are karst-dominated. Mean annual
precipitation for the reserve is 1,660 mm, and annual
mean temperature is 23°C.
Shiwandashan National Nature Preserve
(21°50'24"N 107°52'48"E; hereafter referred to as
Shiwandashan). Our camp was ate. 500 m, c.40 km north
of the Vietnam border. This area was surveyed by MBR,
TJD and GC from 14 April to 8 May 2005. A winding
paved road through the middle of the park connected the
villages of Wangle and Fulong. Ornithological field work
was conducted along the road from the southern park
entrance (at 300 m) to the northern park entrance
(400 m), a distance of c.25 km by road. Surveys along the
road focused on different sections each dawn. In addition,
several steep trails were surveyed, with one accessing a
ridge at 900 m. The area along this ridge and adjacent
ridges had been burned repeatedly, and cattle were present;
as a result, vegetation was very sparse. The less accessible,
highest ridges were covered with a carpet of relatively
young (<3 m in height) bamboo. Mist-net effort (12 m
nets, with 25-29 nets open on all but a few days, all set for
birds, for a total of c.5,910 daylight hours) was
concentrated within 2-3 km of our camp near the pass at
500 m(21°50'24"N 107°52'48"E). The forestwas entirely
secondary, with the tallest trees c.25 m in height. As at
the Diding site, few dead trees were either standing or on
the forest floor. Elevations surveyed ranged from c. 300 to
900 m.
During 15-19 April there was a constant mist with
periods of hard rain at the camp. Thereafter, precipitation
was more sporadic, with several days that were clear, hot
and windy. On the morning of 23 April, a large emergence
of at least two cicada species occurred, which drastically
reduced our ability to detect bird vocalisations at all
elevations from 24 April until the end of the survey; cicada
noise was prominent from 05h50 until after sunset. Prior
to that date, daily tape recordings were made by MBR
usinga Sony Pro-IIwitha SennheiserME 67 microphone.
T o protect the watershed for the region, Shiwandashan
was designated a provincial park in 1 982 and was upgraded
to a national level park in 2002. MacKinnon etal. (1996)
and Zhang (1998) state that the reserve is 1,745 km2,
whereas the Guangxi Forestry Survey and Planning
Institute (2002) list it as 583 km2. The reserve ranges
from c.300 m to 1,462 m and is mostly mountainous.
The park’s lower elevations are densely populated, with
>220,000 residents in 1 1 villages. Parts of the park are
under silvicultural production, e.g. for cinnamon trees.
The geology is dominated by shale, conglomerate, and
granite (Guangxi Forestry Survey and Planning Institute
2002). Mean annual precipitation for the reserve is
2,700 mm; annual mean temperature is 21°C, averaging
13°C in January and 28°C in July.
Scientific specimens were preserved from as many
species as possible, both to confirm identifications and to
permit future in-depth study. Most specimens and all tissue
samples are deposited at University of Kansas Natural
History Museum (KUNHM); the remaining specimens
were deposited at the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous
Region Natural History Museum. All tape recordings are
142
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
deposited at the Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds,
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (MLNS).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We recorded a total of 145 species at the two sites, with
90 species at Diding and 113 at Shiwandashan (see
Appendix; subspecies given where identified and relevant,
dates given for migrants where available and of relevance) .
Only 58 species were shared between the two sites.
Differences in species totals and relative abundances can
be explained by elevation, season, effort and reserve extent.
For example, species recorded only at higher elevations at
Diding would not be expected at Shiwandashan where
we surveyed lower elevations, and likewise a number of
species recorded at Shiwandashan were below elevations
surveyed at Diding. We recorded the globally threatened
Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias brunneata
(BirdLife International 2001) and the nationally protected
White-bellied Green Pigeon Treron sieboldii (listed on the
China National Protected Wild Fauna list).
Vocalisations, behaviour and specimen data indicated
that non-migrant species were breeding at Shiwandashan
during April-May. Owls, nightjars and cuckoos (eight
species) vocalised consistently after twilight and especially
before dawn, with a peak of vocal activity during extensive
moonlight. In contrast, because of the later season
(September-October), very little vocal activity was heard
and no breeding detected at Diding; however, we recorded
juveniles and immatures of many species. Shiwandashan
appears to be an important stopover point for migrating
hawks and eagles. On most mid-mornings we observed
several raptors rising on thermals from the forest and
departing northward.
At both sites, hornbills, parrots and trogons were not
recorded or were very scarce (Appendix). Such families
depend on relatively large tree-holes for nesting and
roosting. In addition to large trees being scarce, both sites
had a dearth of dead trees, apparently owing to removal
for firewood. The scarcity of standing dead trees affected
woodpeckers in particular. Excluding piculets which can
thrive in relatively young forest, only a single woodpecker
species was recorded at Shiwandashan (on two occasions)
and two woodpecker species were recorded at Diding
(once each) . As many as eight woodpecker species might
be expected to be resident (Winker et al. 1995).
The only other published biotic surveys of the Diding
and Shiwandashan reserves were rapid assessments
conducted by the Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden and
Guangxi Forestry Survey and Planning Institute. They
recorded 61 bird species at Diding in July 1999 (Kadoorie
Farm and Botanic Garden 2003a) and 1 1 1 species at
Shiwandashan in March and September 2000 and
December 2001 (Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
2003b), including several species not recorded during our
survey. They also noted the absence of hornbills, parrots,
trogons, and woodpeckers (except piculets) at
Shiwandashan. Additional surveys are needed at both
reserves during all seasons. We anticipate that with
maturation of the forest, especially at Shiwandashan, the
relative abundance of species will change dramatically, and
species with good dispersal abilities may become established.
Below we provide brief notes on records of particular
interest.
Blyth’s Kingfisher Alcedo Hercules
A female netted on 1 October at Diding (KUMNH93313)
represents the first specimen for Guangxi. Two previous
sight records exist, both of single birds in August 1998
from Huaping National Nature Preserve (Kadoorie Farm
and Botanic Garden 2002).
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
A female with a developing ovary (KUNHM 96412)
was mist-netted on 2 May along a stream in secondary
forest at Shiwandashan camp. This appears to be the second
record for Guangxi, following one observed by K. S. Lee
at Shiwandashan on 1 April 2000 (R. Lewthwaite in litt.
2005).
Oriental Scops Owl Otus sunia
At least four individuals were heard persistently singing
every night at Shiwandashan camp, presumably of the
resident subspecies malayanus. All birds gave only three-
note calls (MLNS 126527-8) instead of the typical two-
note call (Konig et al. 1999).
Brown Hawk Owl Ninox scutulata
Two individuals were recorded at Shiwandashan. Sound
recordings (MLNS126529-31) clearly indicate (through
the rising inflection and accent on the second syllable)
that these birds were scutulata and not the recently
proposed split ‘Northern Boobook’ Ninox japonica, which
is known as far south as central Sichuan in China (Cheng
1987, King 2002).
Mountain Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nipalensis
A presumed pair was observed in courtship flight display
on 5 May 2005 at Shiwandashan camp. The pair flew
across the broad valley, with the presumed male
interrupting his normal flight with a short dive followed
by pulling up and fluttering his wings briefly as he trailed
the female. Because of cicada noise, it was impossible to
determine if the male vocalised during the display. This
record is at the southern extremity of the range of the
species in southern China.
Malayan Night Heron Gorsachius melanolophus
An immature female (KUNHM 96393) mist-netted in
old secondary forest on 4 May at Shiwandashan had a
lizard Tropidophoruus sinicus (Scincidae), several
hymenoptera individuals and a beetle in its stomach.
The status of Malayan Night Heron is poorly known in
China.
White-winged Magpie Urocissa whiteheadi
This species is poorly known in China, and in Guangxi
it is known only from the south-western part of the
province. We recorded a family group (four adults and
one immature) at Shiwandashan camp on 29 April and
7 May.
Brown-breasted Flycatcher Muscicapa muttui
Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2001). This species
was recorded at both sites, with breeding in April and
May at Shiwandashan. A female at at Shiwandashan had
just laid an egg on 27 April, as she had a collapsed ovum
and another well-developed ovum, 9x7.5 mm (KUNHM
96494) . This species is known only from the south-western
part of Guangxi (Yang et al. 2004).
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
143
Ferruginous Flycatcher Muscicapa ferruginea
Single individuals of this migratory species were netted at
Diding on 20 September and 1 October (KUMNH
93370-1). These records appear to be first Guangxi
records; however, the species is not unexpected, as it
is known as a migrant through much of China (Cheng
1987).
LARGE Niltava Niltava grandis
Eight immatures were netted at Diding from 21-30
September (KUMNH 96577, 93339-4 1 , 963 1 9, 96320,
two Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Natural
History Museum). These are the first Guangxi records:
the species was known previously in China only from the
extreme south-west (Cheng 1987).
SULTAN Tit Melanochlora sultanea
This tit was encountered twice at Diding, including one
(KUNHM 93412) taken from a mixed-species flock along
a ridge at c. 1,1 00 m. In Guangxi, the species is known
from only the south-western corner; prior records are
from Longzhou (Yen and Chong 1937) and Nonggang
Natural Nature Reserve (J. Fellowes in litt. 2005).
RED-FACED LlOCICHLA Liocichla phoenicea
An adult female was mist-netted at c. 1,000 m on 26
September at Diding (KUNHM 96625). This species
was only recently recorded for Guangxi, in Jingxi County
and at Guilin (Yang et al. 2004).
Buff-breasted Babbler Pellomeum tickelli
An immature female of the subspecies fulvum was mist-
netted on 2 October at Diding (KUNHM 93324). This
apparently represents the first record for Guangxi (Cheng
1987, Yang et al. 2004, R. Lewthwaite in litt. 2005).
SPOT-THROATED BABBLER Pellomeum albiventre
This species was recorded at both sites, with singing and
territorial behaviour documented at Shiwandashan. At
the latter site, the species was recorded from 400-750 m.
These are the first Guangxi records (KUNHM 93321-3,
96492, 966 1 0); previously the species was known in China
from only extreme south-western Yunnan province
(Cheng 1987, Yang et al. 2004).
Chestnut Bulbul Hemixos castanonotus
An immature specimen (KUNHM 93416) from Diding
is whiter ventrally than all Shiwandashan specimens (n=6),
and has whitish-grey wing-feather edging. It therefore fits
the description of the subspecies canipennis. In contrast,
the six adult Shiwandashan specimens have a light grey
wash across the chest and flanks. Three of those specimens
(two males, one female) have yellowish-green wing-feather
fringes; two (both males) have whitish-grey wing-feather
fringes that match the Diding bird, and one (a female) has
intermediate-coloured edging. The yellowish-green wing-
feather edging is characteristic of the nominate subspecies.
It is unclear if Guangxi is where intergradation occurs
between these two subspecies, or whether a dine exists
between the two described forms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank our field colleagues Dale Clayton, Sarah Bush, Judith Eger,
Burton Lim, Christopher Hayden, Don Duszynski and Igbal
Muhammad. Yi Zou, Yunming Mo and Diyun Wen were instrumental
in obtaining permits for our work. U.S. National Science Foundation
grant DEB-030820 supported biotic surveys at both sites. David Willard
(Field Museum of Natural History), Paul Sweet (American Museum
of Natural History), and Per Alstrom were helpful with several specimen
identifications. Richard Webster, Rose Ann Rowlett, Lee Kwok Shing,
and John Fellowes kindly identified several mystery vocalisations and
helped with reference material. We especially want to thank Richard
Lewthwaite for his very informative comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Cheng,T. H. (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing: Science
Press.
Guangxi Forestry Survey and Planning Institute (2002) Guangxi
Shiwandashan Natural Reserve Master Plan (2002-2010) . Nanning:
Guangxi Forestry and Planning Institute and Guangxi Shiwandashan
Nature Preserve Management Station.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. A. (2001) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K. : Oriental Bird
Club.
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (2002) Report of a rapid biodiversity
assessment at Huaping National Nature Preserve, northeast Guangxi,
15-20 August 1998. Hong Kong: Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
(South China Forest Biodiversity Survey Report Series: No. 15).
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (2003a) Report of a rapid biodiversity
assessment at Diding Headwater Forest Nature Preserve, west Guangxi,
China, July 1 999. Hong Kong: Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
(South China Forest Biodiversity Survey Report Series: No. 26).
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (2003b) Report of rapid biodiversity
assessment at Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve and National
Forest Park, southwest Guangxi, China 2000 and 2001. Hong Kong:
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (South China Forest Biodiversity
Survey Report Series: No. 35).
King, B. (2002) Species limits in the Brown Boobook Ninox scutulata
complex. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 122: 250-257.
Konig, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.-H. (1999) Owls: a guide to the owls
of the world. New Haven, Connecticut, U.S .A. : Yale University Press.
MacKinnon, J. (1997) Protected areas systems review of the Indo-Malayan
realm. Canterbury, U.K., Asian Bureau for Conservation.
MacKinnon, J., Meng, S., Cheung, C., Carey, G., Zhu, X. and Mellville,
D. (1 996) A biodiversity review of China. Hong Kong: World Wildlife
Fund for Nature (WWF) International, China Programme.
Winker, H., Christie, D. A. and Numey, D. (1995) Woodpeckers: a guide
to the woodpeckers, piculets, and wrynecks of the world. Robertsbridge,
Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Yang, L., Yang, X., Wen, X., Yang, D. and Jiang, W„ eds. (2004)
Avifauna of Yunnan China. Kumming, P.R. China: Yunnan Science
and Technology Press.
Yen, K. Y. and Chong, L. T. (1937) Notes additionnelles sur l’avifaune
du Kwangsi. Oiseaux et R.F.O. 7: 546-553.
Zhang, W., ed. (1998) China’s biodiversity: a country study. Beijing:
China Environmental Science Press.
MarkB. Robbins, A. Townsend Peterson, Arpad Nyari, Guojun Chen, University of Kansas Natural History: Museum, 1345
Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 U.S. A. Email: mrobbins@ku.edu
Tristan J. Davis, 210 North Leoma Court, Chandler, Arizona 85225 U.S. A.
144
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
145
146
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Key
C = common: >10 individuals/day
U = uncommon: <10 individuals/day, recorded daily
R = rare: <5 individuals/day, not recorded daily
X = 1-2 records in total
m = non-breeding migrant; indicated for Shiwandashan only
Documentation:
Specimen documentation if no notation
S = sight record only
V = voice record only
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
147
Six species of bird new to Laos
J.W. DUCKWORTH
During 2004-2005, 1 observed six bird species previously
unrecorded in Laos. They were observed with 10x42
binoculars and none was collected or photographed, hence
descriptive details of identification are given here.
Currently, no officially constituted body or individual
maintains a list ofbird taxa recorded in Laos. Hence, these
species are judged to be first records for the country after
the exhaustive collation of previous published and
unpublished records by Duckworth et al. (1999),
supplemented by more recent sources. It is possible that
the species have been observed recently in Laos, but that
this information has not been circulated widely, or that
unpublished pre-1950 specimens exist; not all historical
collections have yet been written up (see, e.g., Robinson
and Kloss 1931).
Of an increasing number of ‘grey literature’ sources,
some contain evidently mistaken bird identifications.
Duckworth et al. (1999) wrote that ‘species lists which
present a number of unlikely records without comment
suggest that the observer may not have been aware of the
records’ significance, and thus was unfamiliar with the
avifauna in general. The cautious course is taken of
excluding the whole of such lists from this review’.
Unfortunately, some such lists are now firmly in the public
domain and mention at least some of the species reported
below.
As well as a large computer database, presumably using
much the same information as discussed by Duckworth
(2000), problem sources include two surveys of national
protected areas by an international conservation non¬
governmental organisation for a large conservation and
development project; several environmental impact
assessments for hydro-electric power projects carried out
by an expatriate-staffed consulting company based in
Vientiane; and a mid-1990s book by an expatriate
development worker entitled (in translation) ‘ The birds of
Laos' . These three sources all include many species way
out of geographic and ecological range, some wholly
unlikely to occur anywhere in Laos. For example, the several
reports from the consulting company included 15 birds
not recorded from Laos, of which 1 1 were resident Sundaic
species. Although almost 7 0 bird species were first recorded
in Laos during 1992-1999 (see below), indicating a
historically poorly researched avifauna, not one was a
Sundaic resident; one new mammal was, and largely on
this basis it merited a paper in the prestigious journal Nature
(Surridge et al. 1999). Most tellingly, all of these sources
(explicitly purporting to contain comprehensive species
lists) lacked common, conspicuous species that would
surely have been located at the sites in question by anyone
with even a basic familiarity with South-East Asian birds.
Some mistakes were obvious, e.g. one source contained
multiple claims of Pied Cuckoo Clamator jacobinus, a mere
vagrant to Thailand and Indochina (e.g. Poole and Evans
2004), but not one of Chestnut-winged Cuckoo C.
coromandus, which is widespread in Laos and at least locally
common (e.g. David-Beaulieu 1944, Thewlis etal. 1996);
the two species look somewhat similar.
Recent years have spawned additional misleading
sources, in part through re-use by secondary compilations
of the unreliable 1990s listings, and in part through the
field deployment by international organisations of
inadequately supervised, inexperienced, personnel. It is
fortunate that the organisations do not remove the
obviously unlikely species identifications, thereby masking
the reports’ general unreliability. Objectively, no records
of species on such lists can be used as independent data-
points for determining species’ status and distribution (see
BirdLife International 2001 : 949 for an analogous case).
Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata
A male Mandarin Duck was flushed from a pool with thick
fringing vegetation near Ban (= the village of) Sivilai,
Thulakhom District, Vientiane province (18°19,N
1 02°37,E; altitude 1 75 m), on 23 January 2005 (Parr and
Parr [1998] profiled this site). It flew across the pool,
dropped behind flooded tree bamboo, and was not
relocated. In the ideal light, the bird was instantly and
obviously a male Mandann; I became very familiar in Korea
during 1999-2004 with the species’s distinctive flight
shape. Specific features visible were a small, generally dark,
dumpy duck, a large block-like head and a complex
plumage pattern, including white in the wings, extensive
pale on the face, and long spiky rich-orange feathers on the
foreneck or breast.
No other species in the world looks remotely similar.
This duck is very scarce in South-East Asia. There may be
only two records from Myanmar (Smythies 2001). There
seem to be no specific, dated, records from Vietnam, but
Vo Quy (1981) stated that Mandarins had been collected
in the Lai Chau area (in the far north) in winter. There are
several records from Thailand, particularly recently (e.g.
Robson 1998, 2000b, 2000c, 2002, 2004). Status in nearby
Hong Kong is confused by the presence of free-flying,
wildfowl-collection birds; but all evidence suggests wild
visitors are also very rare there (Carey et al. 2001). It is
therefore unlikely to be more than a vagrant to Laos. The
bird at Ban Sivilai is probably in fact the second record for
Laos, because over 24-25 January 2004, two Mandarins
were seen on the Mekong from Chiang Saen, Thailand
(Robson 2004). This stretch of the Mekong forms the
international border between Thailand and Laos. Previous
reports on its birdlife (e.g. Deignan 1945: 13, Duckworth
et al. 2002) did not distinguish whether birds were in
Thailand or Laos, but took records as referable to both
countries.
Grey-backed Thrush Turdus hortulorum
One, probably two, Grey-backed Thrushes were seen on
26 December 2004 in the forest fragment capping Phou
Fa (= ‘Fa mountain’) arising from Phongsaly town
(2104LN 102°06'E, altitude c. 1,500 m; this site is
discussed in Fuchs et al. in prep.). The birds were in
degraded tall forest with open understorey. A flock of
Black-breasted Thrushes T. dissimilis had used this area
for the preceding few weeks. I concentrated on one bird
148
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
in the open for two minutes at about 15 m range. The
second bird, behind and less well-lit, looked similar, but
all birds in the area were flushed by a passer-by before I
could confirm its identity. I immediately recognised the
bird as a male Grey-backed Thrush, having observed many
in Korea during 2000-2004. The bird had: mid-grey
upperparts, including the cheeks, exactly the colour of
Korean birds; a cream throat separated from a similarly
coloured submoustachial by a bold black malar stripe, the
latter leading to a broad grey band across the lower throat
and upper breast (coloured as the upperparts); rich orange
flanks and clean white belly; and a very slight trace of a
pale supercilium before the eye.
Males cannot be confused with any other Asian thrush.
This bird fits the ‘subadult’ male plumage as in Peterson
etal. (2003). Females can be exceedingly similar to Black¬
breasted Thrush, which was well distributed and probably
common in Phongsaly province in winter 2004-2005
(Fuchs et al. in prep.), and might also be confused with
Japanese Thrush T. cardis, also known from Laos (e.g.
Delacour 1929a).
This thrush may be more regular in Laos than records
suggest: many thrushes in the region are habitual skulkers
and hence are often difficult to see well enough to identify.
This species shares a ‘seeeih’ call with several other species,
including Eyebrowed Thrush T. obscurus (widespread in
Laos in winter; e.g. Thewlis etal. 1 996, Evans and Timmins
1 998, Duckworth et al. 2002) and Black-breasted Thrush
(common in Phongsaly in winter 2004-2005; Fuchs etal.
in prep.). However, that it has not been recorded in
Thailand (Robson 2005) suggests that it is probably not
numerous in Laos, even though it is the commonest
wintering thrush in Hong Kong (Carey et al. 200 1 ) . It has
previously been found in South-East Asia only in East
Tonkin and North Annam (both Vietnam), where it may
be fairly common in winter (Delacour 1 929a, b, Delacour
1930a, Bourret 1943, 1944, Stusak and Vo Quy 1986).
Also one was seen on 24 July 1961 in Hanoi (Fischer
1963), a date suggesting perhaps a captive origin or
misidentification. Phou Fa is at a slightly higher altitude
than given by Robson (2005) for the species in South-East
Asia (‘up to 1,100 m’).
Red-billed Starling Stumus sericeus
At least two Red-billed Starlings were seen at Pakxan
wetlands, Bolikhamxai province (18°23'N 103°41'E; 155
m), on 29-30 January 2005 (Wood [in prep.] gives more
detail about this site). The precise number was unclear,
among the many mobile starlings and mynas in the area.
The first bird seen, on 29 January in a tree bamboo, had
a plumage pattern obviously differing from the other
common stumids present (c. 400 Chestnut-tailed Starlings
S’, malabaricus , c.80 White-vented Mynas Acridotheres
cinereus and 32 Black-collared Starlings S’, nigricollis) . It
was watched for c. 2 minutes at c.50 m range in good light,
and showed: overall rather fawn body coloration; plain¬
looking face; mantle concolorous with head; belly slightly
paler than head and breast; very pale honey-buff rump;
glossy black remiges with a neat white crescent mark on
the primary coverts and/or at the base of the exposed
remiges; no other pale edges or marks on the exposed
remiges; dark tail, probably also glossy black; orange-red
legs. Bill structure (colour not visible) resembled Common
Starling S. vulgaris , the bird being perhaps a little bigger
and bulkier. Coincidentally I had examined skins of Red¬
billed and White-cheeked Starlings at the Natural History
Museum, Tring, UK (BMNH) in August 2004 in
connection with the first record of Red-billed Starling for
DPR Korea (Duckworth 2004). After several brief flight
views of starlings showing various features consistent
with Red-billed Starling, in groups of up to nine birds, in
the late afternoon of 30 January an adult was located in
a tree. It was watched for 10 minutes from 100 m range
initially, moving rapidly in to 30 m. It showed: a ‘clean’-
grey mantle; glossy black exposed remiges with a small
white mark on the primary coverts and/or at the base of
the exposed remiges; elongated falcate silvery scapulars
drooping down over the remiges giving a jagged edge
between silver and black; no pale edging or tracery on
remiges or secondary coverts; rump much paler than
mantle, but not white; tail glossy black with no pale tip,
corners or sides; head paler than body, a rather ‘dirty’-
blond tone; very slightly darker clouding to rear and lower
edge of eye; no black ellipse mark around the eye; legs
bright straw-orange in colour, bill colour not assessable
(hidden by leaves during close views); size rather bigger
than Chestnut-tailed Starling.
The second bird could only be an adult Red-billed
Starling. Various features, notably the lack of a black eye-
patch, rule out the only possible confusion species,
Vinous-breasted Starling 5. burmannicus. The first
perched bird was probably that species as well; any Vinous¬
breasted Starling with a uniform fawn body would not
have glossy black wings, and the species never looks plain¬
faced. Young White-shouldered Starling S’, sinensis might
be an outside confusion risk, but never shows a small
white wing mark or brightly coloured legs. Probably, based
on flight views, at least nine Red-billed Starlings were
present.
In the following winter, one was photographed in a
paddy in a former ox-bow from Nam Tha river (20°56'N
101°24'E), 6 km south of Louang-Namtha town, on 20
November 2005 by T. Tizard {in litt. 2005).
Apart from an old record in Cochinchina, southern
Vietnam (Germain 1912), the Red-billed Starling’s
recorded South-East Asian winter distribution resembles
that of Grey-backed Thrush, being numerous in Hong
Kong (Carey et al. 2001), regular, widespread and
sometimes common in northern Vietnam (Oustalet 1886,
Delacour and Jabouille 1927, Delacour et al. 1928,
Delacour 1929b, Milon 1942, Bourret 1944, Stusak and
Vo Quy 1986, Scott et al. 1989, Le Manh Hung et al.
2002), but previously unrecorded further west: Oustalet’s
(1886) suspicion that the bird does not habitually pass
west of the Annamite mountains seems to be true. The
first Thai records of Red-billed Starling came during
January-February of the same winter, of 1-2 birds at two
sites (Round and Jukmongkol 2005a,b) . The Pakxan birds
could also be considered to constitute a Thai record,
because the small starlings all flew across the Mekong to
roost in Thailand (as do various other birds at this site,
e.g. egrets; Wood in prep.). Red-billed Starling was
previously noted to mix with dry-season flocks of Chestnut¬
tailed Starling by, e.g., Germain (1912). Pakxan appears
to be perfect habitat for the species, given that in Hong
Kong it uses wet agricultural areas (Carey et al. 2001).
White-cheeked Starling Stumus cineraceus
A White-cheeked Starling by the inflow of the Nam Khang
(= ‘Khang river’) to the Nam Ou (22°06'N 102°15'E,
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
149
c.510 m; within the Phou Dendin National Protected
Area, a few hundred yards from the village of Ban
Sopkhang) on 6 December 2004 was picking and eating
insects out of the crumbling earth river-banks amid
overgrown former cultivation. I immediately recognised
the bird as a well-marked White-cheeked Starling, having
observed many in Korea during 1 999-2004, and observed
it for five minutes at 20-25 m range; as I approached to
within 6 m, it llew to a nearby small tree. It had a blackish
cap (extending down to the eye) and throat; white cheeks
with white streaking on the lores, crown and to the rear
of the cheek-patch onto the dark neck-sides; cold brown
upperparts with ‘dirty’-greyish underparts, palest on the
flanks and thighs; a white vent; tail and remiges slightly
darker than the mantle; white rump, tail-tip, alula and
wingbar; and ‘dirty’-orange legs and bill, the latter with
dark tip and distal culmen.
White-cheeked Starling is not readily confusable with
any other species. A vagrant might be expected to flock
with local starlings (see Carey etal. 2001). However, non¬
forest sturnids have declined so severely in the northern
highlands of Laos that this was the only wild individual of
any species seen during a month of winter fieldwork in
Phongsaly province (Fuchs et al. in prep.).
This species may well occur not infrequently in Laos,
because it is a common but localised winter visitor to
Hong Kong (Carey etal. 2001), is regular and sometimes
common in Tonkin (Delacoumu/. 1928, Delacour 1929b,
Kinnear 1929, Bourret 1944, Fischer 1961, Stusak and
Vo Quy 1986, Scott et al. 1989), has been found twice,
although not certainly as a wild bird, in Thailand (Round
1998) and has even occurred west to Myanmar where it
was assessed as a ‘rare winter visitor’ to the North
(Smythies 2001).
Rosy Pipit Anthus roseatus
Rosy Pipits were seen at three sites in Phongsaly province,
at each in both December 2004 and March 2005. At Ban
Muangyo (21°3 l'N 101°51'E, c.680 m), there was one on
24 December and seven on 22 March. At nearby Ban Dua
(21°29'N 101°51'E, c.690 m), there were nine, probably
eleven (tape-recorded), on 25 December and three on 23
March. At Ban Boun-Nua (21°38'N 101°54'E, c.960 m),
there were two on 25 December and six, perhaps nine, on
21 March. The call, reminiscent of Meadow Pipit A.
pratensis of Europe and of Buff-bellied Pipit A. mbescens
japonicus of north-east Asia, immediately ruled out all pipit
species previously recorded in Laos. The first bird was
watched for longest and the most detailed notes taken of
it, as it foraged slowly in short grass and bare mud beside
a small river amid farmland. It was watched in perfect
morning winter light at c. 1 5 m for 7-8 minutes, alternating
binoculars with a x 1 5 telescope. It had: a prominent white
supercilium from bill to nape; a dark line from fore-crown
to culmen; a streaked crown but fairly plain nape; fairly
plain ear-coverts between a dark eyestripe and a somewhat
prominent dark moustachial stripe along the lower margin
and an ill-defined palish spot in the lower rear; a strong
pale submoustachial stripe with a big black malar spot,
only slightly extending as a streak towards the bill (i.e., the
basal two-thirds of the malar stripe were ‘missing’) ; a clear,
slightly buff-tinged, throat; boldly streaked upperparts
somewhat reminiscent of Red-throated Pipit A cervinus,
including two prominent pairs of dark-bordered pale
‘tramlines’, the outer two of the three blackish stripes being
bolder than the inner; distinct olive-green (almost golden-
green in some lights) fringes to the folded remiges and (at
least) parts of the greater coverts; breast and flanks with
bold well-defined elongated black spots, running as streaks,
on a creamy background with a very slight rosy tint on
lower throat and upper breast; a clean white vent and
undertail-coverts; and bill largely or entirely dark. The
rump pattern could not be discerned. It called freely as it
made short flights between foraging sites. Most calls were
of single notes (a sibilant psip) but sometimes 2-3 (e.g.
psipfooo or pseet eet-eee) . It sometimes pumped its tail in a
rather desultory fashion.
The call and bold supercilium rule out the otherwise
somewhat similar Red-throated Pipit, which is an
abundant winter visitor to much of Laos (e.g. Thewlis et
al. 1996, Evans and Timmins 1998, Duckworth et al.
2002). Although it seems to be scarce in Phongsaly
province in winter (Fuchs et al. in prep.), one at Ban Dua
close to the 25 December flock of Rosy Pipits gave
opportunities for direct comparison of call and plumage.
The boldness of the upperpart streaking is Rosy Pipit’s
best distinction from the otherwise rather similar Buff-
bellied Pipit, which has not occurred in Laos but is a
scarce non-breeding visitor to Hong Kong (Carey et al.
200 1 ) and a vagrant to Thailand (Robson 2005), so must
be considered for Laos. An additional distinction from
Buff-bellied Pipit is that the eye-stripe seemed to extend
right to the bill, although it could not be confirmed this
was not an effect of the light. The described strength of
the ‘tramlines’ is anomalously bold for Rosy Pipit
compared with Robson (2000a), but reflects comparison
with Buff-bellied Pipit (the alternative most in mind at
time of sighting). Bold supercilium, prominent mantle
streaking and call were noted on all subsequent sightings.
By March, some had assumed full breeding plumage with
extensive rosy throat and bright greenish fringes to the
remiges, e.g. four of those at Ban Muangyo, although two
there were still in winter plumage.
All birds at Ban Muangyo and Ban Dua were foraging
in semi-waterlogged short grass, bare mud and pebble
shoals beside and within small shallow rivers amid
farmland. Those at Ban Boun-Nua were amid paddy
stubbles where one of the town’s waste-water channels
gave a flush of green vegetation. They were never found
in the relatively extensive areas of dry fields in these three
sites. Such an association with wet areas was also noted
in far-northern Thailand by Round (1983).
These records indicate that the species winters in far-
northern Laos, as it does in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai
provinces, north-west Thailand, where it has become
scarcer in recent years, probably reflecting agricultural
changes (e.g. Round 1983, P. D. Round in litt. 2005).
There is also a record of a vagrant much further south, in
Bangkok on 10 January 1928 (specimen collected by C.
J. Agaard, in Chulalungkhorn University Zoology
Museum, Thailand; P. D. Round in litt. 2005). There
seem to be only two published records from northern
Vietnam (Tonkin): one collected at Muong Moun on 25
March 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), and one taken
at Pakha (1300 m) on 26 December 1929 (MNHN CG
1 939-834; Delacour 1 930a, b, J. Fuchs in litt. 2005) . It is
also a vagrant to Cochinchina (Robson 2005). Unlike all
the other species treated here, Rosy Pipit has not been
recorded from Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001); it is
commoner to the west, rather than to the east, of Laos,
150
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
being widespread, and locally very common, in Myanmar
(Smythies 2001). Numbers wintering in the region
fluctuate (C. R. Robson in litt. 2004), so it cannot yet be
assumed that it winters annually in Laos.
Japanese Grosbeak Eophona personata
An adult in roadside forest on Phou Taleng, Phongsaly
province (2 1 °37'N 1 0 1 °57'E; c. 1 ,300 m) on 9 December
2004 was detected by a weak-sounding though far-carrying
kick call, at first thought to be that of a Dendrocopos
woodpecker; but a big finch readily visible in the sparsely
leaved crown of a small tree was immediately obvious
as an Eophona. Coincidentally, I had examined
exhaustively skins of both species, Japanese and Yellow¬
billed Grosbeak E. migratoria , at BMNH only a few months
previously in connection with many observations of the
genus in Korea during 2000-2004, and so knew exactly
what features to concentrate on. I watched it eating berries
and loafing, in perfect light at 25-30 m range, for ten
minutes until a passing hawk Accipiter flushed it. It had:
a neatly bordered pure black mask covering the frons,
fore- and mid-crown, including the region around the eye
and a thin band below the bill and around the chin; a
slightly warm grey body (similar in tone to underparts of
female Eurasian Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula), including
most of the head and underparts broadly concolorous
with the mantle, flanks a little warmer in colour; off-
white vent; a discrete white wing-patch about two-thirds
of the way down the folded visible glossy black remiges
but no white wing-point or white tipping to any
remiges; a glossy black tail; a large yellow bill, slightly
dusky at the tip and as big as a Hawfinch’s Coccothraustes
coccothraustes, but more pointed. The flight action and
silhouette were heavy compared with other finches, as is
typical of the genus. The call was tape-recorded when it
returned a few minutes later and perched for five minutes
in another tree, allowing re-confirmation of head and
wing pattern.
The only conceivable confusion species is Yellow-billed
Grosbeak, which has been recorded in Laos only as a
winter visitor to Xiangkhouang province, where it was
formerly regular (Bourret 1943, David-Beaulieu 1944;
dates on Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle specimen
labels per J. Fuchs in litt. 2005). The only known recent
claim from Laos, from Phongsaly (in Duckworth et al.
1999: 157) was in error and has been withdrawn by
the observer (T. Tizard in litt. 2005). Yellow-billed
Grosbeak is significantly smaller than Japanese Grosbeak:
Bourret’ s ( 1 943) wing measurements of 1 02 mm and 1 03
mm confirm the Xiangkhouang birds as Y ellow-billed; as
do six specimens collected by David-Beaulieu in
Xiangkhouang, now in the Museum National d’Histoire
Naturelle, Paris, France (J. Fuchs in litt. 2005). Yellow¬
billed Grosbeak varies greatly in plumage with age and
sex, but never has a head pattern as shown by this bird,
and any bird with a neat black mask also shows white tips
to at least some remiges. Although some books (e.g. Lee
et al. 2000) indicate different plumages for male and
female Japanese Grosbeak, the many skins at the BMNH
shows that the sexes are not readily distinguishable by
plumage.
This is the first record for South-East Asia (see Robson
2005). Its appearance in North Laos is not unexpected,
because it occurs, although only rarely, at similar latitudes
in Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001). Indeed apparently the
first record for adjoining Yunnan province, China, came
on 7 November 2005 with a single bird in Kunming (J.
Hornskov in litt. 2005).
Concluding remarks
All six of these species are non-breeding visitors from
further north in Asia. During 1992-1999, 67 species were
found for the first time in Laos (calculated from figures in
Duckworth et al. 1999, modified with Duckworth et al.
2002, Duckworth and Tizard 2003). Of these, 33 were
forest species presumed or known to breed in Laos, hence
indicating a generally poor coverage of Laos during the
historical era (pre- 1 950) . By contrast, none of the present
six novelties is a resident forest species. No significance
should be attached to this, because observation was
strongly weighted towards non-forest habitats during
2004-2005 . Phongsaly, being right at the northern margin
of Laos and indeed South-East Asia, is clearly an easy
place in which to find northern species around their
southern winter limit. Twenty-two of the species first
recorded in Laos during 1992-1999 were northern
migrants, and judging by species recorded in Hong Kong
(Carey etal. 2001) and Tonkin, Vietnam (Robson 2005),
it is likely that many more firsts for Laos remain to be
found among the non-breeding visitors to Phongsaly
province. The resident forest avifauna of the province
remains barely explored, and is also likely to contain
novelties.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Phongsaly observations were made through the European Union (EU)
‘Phongsaly Forest Conservation and Rural Development Project’, and
I particularly thank the Phongsaly Provincial Agriculture and Forestry
Office (PAFO) and project co-directors Chris Hatten and Visara
Bouppha. Viengsack Phommasy of the Phongsaly PAFO shared some
of these observations. Frank Haegeman and Dirk Hahn participated
in the visit to Ban Sivilai, and Chris Wood showed me around Pakxan
wetlands. Geoff Carey, Pete Davidson, Jonathan Eames, Jerome Fuchs,
Jesper Hornskov, Tim Inskipp, Craig Robson, Philip Round, R. J.
‘Ted’ Tizard and A. W. ‘Jack’ Tordoff supplied comparative
information. I particularly thank staff at the Natural History Museum
bird group, particularly Robert Prys-Jones and Mark Adams, for
assistance during my visits, and Jerome Fuchs for data from specimens
in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Nick Dymond
and Jon Hornbuckle reviewed the manuscript, including the
acceptability of the identifications.
REFERENCES
Bangs, O. and Van Tyne, J. (1931) Birds of the Kelley-Roosevelts
expedition to French Indochina. Pub. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. ( Zool .
Ser.) 18: 33-119.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Bourret, R. (1943) Liste des oiseaux recemment entres dans les
collections du Laboratoire de Zoologie. Notes et travaux de I’Ecole
superieure des Sciences de I’Universite Indochinoise, Hanoi 2: 18-37.
Bourret, R. (1944) Liste des oiseaux dans la collection du Laboratoire
de Zoologie, troisieme liste, 1943. Notes et travaux de
I’Ecole superieure des Sciences de I’Universite Indochinoise, Hanoi 3:
19-36.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
151
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (200 1 ) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Birdwatching Society.
David-Beaulieu, A. (1944) Les oiseaux du Tranninh. Hanoi: Universite
Indochinoise.
Deignan, H. G. (1945) The birds of northern Thailand. Washington
D.C.: United States Government Printing Office (Smithsonian
Institution: United States National Museum Bulletin 186).
Delacour, J. ( 1 929a) On the birds collected during the fourth expedition
to French Indo-china. Ibis (12)5: 193-220, 403-429.
Delacour, J. ( 1 929b) Les oiseaux migrateurs de l’Indochine franf aise.
J. Orn. 77 Suppl. 2: 71-82.
Delacour, J. ( 1 930a) On the birds collected during the fifth expedition
to French Indo-China. Ibis (12)6: 564-599.
Delacour, J. (1930b) Note sur quelques oiseaux rares ou nouveaux
obtenus au cours de la cinquieme expedition en Indochine. Oiseau
et R.F.O. 11: 457-468.
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1927) Recherches omithologiques dans les
provinces du Tranninh (Laos), de Thua-Thien et de Kontoum (Annam)
et quelques autres regions de T Indochine frangaise. Archives d’Histoire
Naturelle. Paris: Societe Nationale d’Acclimatation de France.
Delacour, J., Jabouille, P. and Lowe, W. P. (1928) On the birds collected
during the third expedition to French Indo-China. Ibis (12)4: 23-
51, 285-317.
Duckworth, J. W. (2000) A clutch of published distribution-map errors
concerning birds in Laos. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 32: 50-52.
Duckworth, J. W. (2004) Eight birds new to DPR Korea. Forktail 20:
116-120.
Duckworth, J. W. and Tizard, R. J. (2003) W. W. Thomas’s bird
records from Laos, principally Vientiane, 1966-1968 and 1981-
1983. Forktail 19: 63-84.
Duckworth, J. W., Salter, R. E. and Khounboline, K. (compilers)
(1999) Wildlife in Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report. Vientiane: IUCN-
The World Conservation Union / Wildlife Conservation Society /
Centre for Protected Areas and Watershed Management.
Duckworth, J. W., Davidson, P., Evans, T. D., Round, P. D. and
Timmins, R. J. (2002) Bird records from Laos, principally the
upper Lao/Thai Mekong and Xiangkhouang province, in 1998-
2000. Forktail 18: 11-44.
Evans, T. D. and Timmins, R. J. (1998) Records of birds from Laos
during January-July 1994. Forktail 13: 69-96.
Fischer, W. (1961) Kleine Beitrage zur Vogelkunde Vietnams. Beitrage
zurVogelkunde 7: 285-317.
Fischer, W. (1963) Weitere Beitrage zurVogelkunde Vietnams. Beitrage
zurVogelkunde 9: 102-123.
Fuchs, J., Cibois, A., Duckworth, J. W., Eve, R., Robichaud, W. G.,
Tizard, R. J. and Van Gansberghe, D. (in prep.) A review of bird
records from Phongsaly province (Laos).
Germain, R. (1912) Sturnides de la Cochinchine franpaise. Revue
frangaise d’Omithologie 2: 302-305, 337-338.
Kinnear, N. B. (1929) On the birds collected by Mr. H. Stevens in
northern Tonkin in 1923-24 (with notes by the collector). Ibis
(12)5: 107-150, 292-344.
Le Manh Hung, Nguyen Due Tu, Tordoff, A. W. and Vu Hong Phuong.
(2002) A rapid bird survey of the coastal zone of Quang Ninh province,
Vietnam. Hanoi: BirdLife International Vietnam Programme.
Lee, W.-S., Koo, T.-H. and Park, J.-Y. (2000) A field guide to the birds
of Korea. Seoul: LG Evergreen Foundation.
Milon, P. (1942) Liste des oiseaux observes dans la region de Lang-
son (avec quelques notes ethologiques). Notes et travaux de I’Ecole
superieure des sciences de TUniversite Indochinoise, Hanoi 1: 1-22.
Oustalet, E. (1886) Notices sur quelques especes nouvelles ou peu
connues de la collection omithologiques de Museum. I. Description
du Rheinardius ocellatus, espece peu connue de l’ordre du Gallinaces,
et catalogue d’une collection d’oiseaux formee dans Pempire
d’ Annam. Nouvelles Archives du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle. (2)8:
255-300.
Parr, J. and Parr, M. (1998) Cooperative management of a wetland in
central Lao P.D.R.-Nong Bo. Tigerpaper 25(4): 5-8.
Peterson, A. T., Navarro-Sigiienza, A. G. and Chen Guojun (2003)
Delayed plumage maturation in Asian thrushes, genus Turdus.
Forktail 19: 152-153.
Poole, C. M. and Evans, T. D. (2004) Pied Cuckoo at Basset. Cambodia
Bird News 12: 43.
Robinson, H. C. and Kloss, C. B. (1931) Some birds from Siam and
Laos (Middle Mekong). Ibis (13)1: 319-341.
Robson, C. (1998) From the field: Thailand. Oriental Bird Club Bull.
28: 46-47.
Robson, C. (2000a) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C. (2000b) From the field: Thailand. Oriental Bird Club Bull.
31: 53-56.
Robson, C. (2000c) From the field: Thailand. Oriental Bird Club Bull.
32: 73-75.
Robson, C. (2002) From the field: Thailand. Oriental Bird Club Bull.
35: 89-92.
Robson, C. (2004) From the field: Thailand. BirdingASlA 1: 83-86.
Robson, C. (2005) New Holland field guide to the birds of South-East
Asia. London: New Holland.
Round, P. D. (1983) Five bird species new for Thailand. Bull. Brit.
Om. Club 103: 77-79.
Round, P. D. (1998) Recent reports. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thailand Bull.
15(4): 15.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol, R. (2005a) Recent report: October
2004-January 2005. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thailand Bull. 22(2):
16-19.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol, R. (2005b) Recent report: March-
early April 2005. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thailand Bull. 22(5): 17-20.
Scott, D. A., Howes, J. and Le Dien Due (1989) Recommendations for
management of Xuan Thuy Reserve, Red River Delta, Vietnam.
Appendix III: birds recorded in Xuan Thuy District, Red River
Delta, 10-12 March 1988 & 17-31 March 1989. Kuala Lumpur:
Asian Wetland Bureau (Publication no. 44).
Smythies, B. E. (2001) The Birds of Burma, 4th ed. Kota Kinabalu,
Malaysia: Natural History Publications (Borneo).
Stusak, J. M. and Vo Quy (1986) The birds of the Hanoi area. Prague:
University of Agriculture.
Surridge, A. K., Timmins, R. J., Hewitt, G. M. and Bell, D. J. (1999)
Striped rabbits in Southeast Asia. Nature 400: 726.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Anderson, G. Q. A., Dvorak, M.,
Evans, T. D., Nemeth, E., Timmins, R. J. and Wilkinson, R. J.
(1996) Ornithological records for Laos, 1992-1993. Forktail 1 1:
47-100.
Vo Quy (1981) [Birds of Vietnam] , vol. 2. Hanoi: Nha Xuat Ban Khoa
Hoc Va Ky Thuat. (In Vietnamese.)
Wood, C. (in prep.) Bird records from Pakxan, North Laos.
J. W. Duckworth, East Re dh am Farm, Pilning, Bristol BS35 4JG, U.K.
152
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Notable bird records from Mizoram
in north-east India
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
The state of Mizoram (2 1°58'-24°30'N 92° 1 b'-93°25'E)
is located in the southern part of north-east India (Fig. 1 ) .
Formerly referred to as the Lushai Hills of southern Assam,
it covers an area of 2 1 ,08 1 km2. Mizoram falls in the Indo-
Burma global biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al. 2000)
and the Eastern Himalaya Endemic Bird Area
(Stattersfield et al. 1998). The entire state is hilly and
mountainous. The highest ranges are towards east with
the peaks of Phawngpui (2,157 m; the highest point in
Mizoram) and Lengteng (2,141m). The lowest elevation,
< 100 m, is in the riverbeds near the borders with Assam
and Bangladesh border. The climate is tropical monsoon-
type with a hot wet summer and a cool dry winter.
Temperatures range from 7° to 34°C; annual rainfall
ranges from 2,000 to 4,000 mm.
The original vegetation type is tropical evergreen forest,
typically including Dipterocarpus turbinatus, Palaquium
polyanthum and Artocarpus chaplasha trees. Owing to
logging and jhnm (slash-and-burn shifting cultivation),
large areas have been replaced with bamboo, especially in
older abandoned jhums. The least-disturbed forests are
found in the southern part of the state in Lawngtlai and
Saiha districts. In the higher areas of the east, subtropical
broadleaf forest occurs, including Tetrameles nudiflora ,
Gmelina arborea and Bombax ceiba, with Quercus spp. and
Rhododendron sp. at higher altitudes.
The existing protected area network covers c.4.5% of
Mizoram. The main protected areas are Dampa Wildlife
Sanctuary and Tiger Reserve (500 km2), Murlen National
Park (150 km2), Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary (1 10 km2),
Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary (80 km2) and Phawngpui
National Park (50 km2).
Owing to insurgency from the 1 960s to 1 987, Mizoram
has been relatively little studied in recent decades. The
few published works include Koelz (1954), Rao and
Zoramthanga (1976), Choudhury (1996), Katju (1996),
and Ghose and Thanga (1998), with unpublished field
reports by Kaul et al. (1996), Robertson (1996) and
Shankar Raman (1995), and more general information
available in All and Ripley ( 1 987) and Islam and Rahmani
(2004).
METHODS
During fieldwork, I surveyed birds using direct
observations (with 10x40 binoculars and a 10x46
telescope), noting calls (for some species only) and by
interviewing local forest staff, villagers and hunters . Direct
observations were made on foot along existing and newly
cut paths, and from vehicles along roads and tracks
(particularly to spot birds kept as pets, and preserved
specimens such as hornbill casques and feathers which
are often displayed outside huts). I carried out a total of
41 days fieldwork in Mizoram during 1986-2001. This
included fieldwork in Aizawl, Kolasib and Mamit districts,
northern Mizoram, in March 1986 (five days), February
1 987 (seven days) and April 1 988 (5 days) while based in
southern Assam. During 2-17 April 2000, 1 visited parts
of Aizawl, Kolasib, Lawngtlai, Lunglei, Mamit, Saiha,
and Serchhip districts and surveyed Dampa Sanctuary
and Tiger Reserve, Ngengpui Willdlife Sanctuary,
Phawngpui National Park and the fringe of Khawnglung
Wildlife Sanctuary. This included 6 1 km of foot transect
along paths and streams, 2.5 km of boat transects along
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
153
Aizawl, Kolasib and Champhai districts and surveyed
Lengteng Wikilife Sanctuary and Murlen National Park.
This includied 30 km of foot transects and 943 km of road
transects. Localities are detailed in Table 1 .
SIGNIFICANT RECORDS
Details are provided for the more interesting and significant
records, including five threatened and seven Near
Threatened species. Records of galliformes and large
raptors are included, given the high hunting pressures on
these species in the region. IUCN Red List status follows
BirdLife International (2004) and restricted-range status
follows Stattersfield et al. (1998).
White-cheeked Partridge Arbomphila atrognlaris
Near Threatened. This common species was frequently
encountered in forest in Mamit, Kolasib and Aizawl
districts, near the Assam border, especially in Inner Line
reserve forest during 1986-1988.
Mountain Bamboo Partridge Bambusicola fytchii
I observed a covey of at least six birds at Farpak, Phawngpui
National Park, on 13 April 2000, heard calls from four
sites around Farpak on the mornings of 13 and 14 April
2000, and also recorded the species at three sites in
Champai district in February 2001: near the south-western
boundary of Lengteng Sanctuary, c.4 km south-west of
Lengteng sanctuary towards Lamzawl, and 5 km west of
Champhai. Large populations probably occur in Mizoram
given the abundance of bamboo brakes throughout the
state.
BLYTH’S TRAGOPAN Tragopan blythii
Vulnerable. Restricted-range. This species is known in
Mizoram only from Phawngpui National Park, where I
recorded five males calling within a 3 km2 area at Farpak
on 12 April 2000. I estimate that there is c.20 km2 of
potential habitat for the species in the park. Local villagers
in Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary and Murlen National Park
did not recognise images of the species.
KALIJ PHEASANT Lophura lencomelanos
I recorded many sightings of this species in northern areas
of Mizoram, especially near the Assam-Mizoram border
in Mamit, Kolasib and Aizawl districts during 1 986-1988.
It was seen as low as c. 70 m near Bhairabi, Kolasib district,
in March 1 987. Elsewhere, a male and a female were seen
crossing a road c.15 km north-west of Sairang, Mamit
district, on 4 April 2000, and the species was reported by
villagers to be snared and shot fairly frequently in
abandoned jhums around Bhairabi, Vairengte, Sangau,
Lawngtlai and Phura.
Mrs Hume’s Pheasant Synnaticus humiae
Vulnerable. A recent survey showed that this species
appears to be widely distributed in the higher hills of
eastern Mizoram, especially in Champhai and Saiha
districts, and possibly occurs in Lunglei and Serchhip
districts (Choudhury 2002a, 2005). In addition to the
previously known localities of Murlen and Phawngpui
National Parks, hunters’ specimens were recorded at
Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary, North Diltlang, Surtlang,
Arhtlang and Ngur, all in Champhai district, and it was
reported by local people at twelve additional sites
(Choudhury 2005).
Grey Peacock Pheasant Polyplectron bicalcaratum
I recorded this species in: the Inner Line reserve forests,
Aizawl and Kolasib districts (heard 1 987- 1 988); Ngengpui
Wildlife Sanctuaries (April 2000); Lengteng Wildlife
Sanctuary (February 200 1 ); Murlen National Park (heard
in February 200 1 ); Dampa sanctuary (heard in April 2000);
at five sites between Rawlbuk and Ngopa, Champhai
district (heard in February 2001); and Lamzawl, Champhai
district (snared bird seen in February 2001).
Great Hornbill Buceros bicomis
Near Threatened. This species was presumably once
commoner, given the number of preserved casques I saw
in villages (e.g. >20 seen between Lunglei and Lawngtlai),
but it has now become extremely rare and locally extirpated
owing to hunting and habitat loss. I only recorded two
birds in the field: between Ngopa and Rabung, Champhai
district, in February 2001 .
Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli
Near Threatened. This species was not seen in the field.
Only a single casque was seen in Vapar village, Champhai
district; it was probably more than a decade old and was
reportedly shot near Murlen National Park. In 1987, I
saw one in flight south-west of Jamalpur, Assam, very
close to the Mizoram border (Choudhury 2000).
Wreathed Hornbill Rhyticeros undulatus
Like other hornbills, this species was previously commoner
in the state, but is now extremely rare and locally
extirpated. I did not record any in the field, but saw a
casque of a fairly recently killed bird from near or inside
Dampa Wildlife Sanctuary at Teirei. Old casques dating
from the 1980s or early 1990s were seen in Vapar near
Murlen National Park, and Sangau and Thaltlang near
Phawngpui National Park in February 2001 .
Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris
Preserved casques and feathers of this species were seen
in most of the villages surveyed in or near: Dampa,
Ngengpui, Khawnglung and Lengteng Wildlife
Sanctuaries; Murlen and Phawngpui National Parks; Inner
Line and Ngengpui reserve forests; and the forests of
Lawngtlai and Saiha districts. In April 2000, birds were
seen in Ngengpui Sanctuary (three), PalakDil (one), and
between Laty and Phura (at least ten), and were heard
calling in Phawngpui National Park.
Dark-RUMPED Swift Apus acuticauda
Vulnerable; restricted range. This species was recorded
in Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary on 20 February 200 1 and
in Phawngpui National Park on 13 April 2000. On both
occasions, at least three and one individual respectively
were identified and watched for 20-25 minutes in mixed
flocks of Fork-tailed Swift A pacificus and Brown-backed
Needletail Chaetura gigantea flying around cliff-faces.
They were dark brownish below, with a greyish-white
throat, darker fine scaly marks on the underparts below
the upper breast, darker lower belly, and brownish
underwing, with glossy black upperparts, with a slaty-
bluish hue on the back seen on at least one bird. They
differed from Fork-tailed Swift by their lack of white rump
154
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
and lack of contrasting white throat, but it was difficult to
discern any differences in the shape of the tail-fork, wing-
length or overall size. Common Swift A. apus (which has
not yet been recorded in Mizoram) lacks strong markings
on the underparts.
BLACK Baza Aviceda leuphotes
One was seen in flight in Ngengpui Sanctuary on 9 April
2000 giving a loud cheew cheew call.
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis and
Slender-billed Vulture G. tenuirostris
Critically Endangered. Both species were recorded in
Bhairabi in March 1 996, February 1 997 and April 1 998,
in mixed flocks of 7- 1 0 soaring birds, but were not recorded
subsequently.
BLACK Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
Singles were observed in Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary on
8 April 2000, at Sangau on 1 2 April 2000 and in Phawngpui
National Park on 12 and 13 April 2000; two were seen
between Kolodyne bridge and Saiha on 1 1 April 2000
and between Rawlbuk and Sangau on 12 April 2000.
Short-toed Snake Eagle Circaetus gallicus
A single bird was observed soaring near Thingfal, Lunglei
district, at 1,050 m on 8 April 2000. This was the first
record of the species for Mizoram (it was not listed by Ali
and Ripley 1987 or Grimmett et al. 1998). Its white
underparts and underwings, which were narrowly barred
pale brown, grey-brown upper breast, and almost square-
cut tail were conspicuous when seen overhead.
RUFOUS-BELLIED EAGLE Hieraaetus kienerii
One immature was seen in flight in Ngengpui Wildlife
Sanctuary on 8 April 2000. An adult was observed perched
in a tree near Ngopa, north-west of Lengteng Wildlife
Sanctuary, in February 2001.
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
One seen perched in a shrub on a cliff near Farpak,
Phawngpui National Park, on 13 April 2000. It was
identified as F. p. peregrinatorby its dark-grey upperparts,
black hood and moustache, rufous breast and whitish
cheeks, throat and sides of neck.
DARTER Anhinga melanogaster
Near Threatened. One was seen at Palak Dil on 1 1 April
2000. Habitat for this species in Mizoram is very restricted
because of the scarcity of wetlands (Choudhury 2002b).
Burmese Shrike Lanins collurioides
Singles were seen along roadsides throughout the state in
April 2000 and February 200 1 . The seasonal status of this
species is not clear in north-east India (Ali and Ripley
1987, Choudhury 2000). It may be resident with local
movements as well as a passage migrant. It is considered
a passage migrant elsewhere in the region (Grimmett et al.
1998).
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos
This species was recorded on three occasions: single birds
seen at Ngengpui, Phura and near Phawngpui, in April
2000. It is rare owing to persecution, particularly in the
vicinity of human habitations.
PURPLE Cochoa Cochoa purpurea
Near Threatened. A male was seen at c.2,050 m between
Farpak and Blue Mountain peak, Phawngpui National
Park, on 1 3 April 2000. The species was also recorded in
the same area in March 1998 by Sangha (2001).
Striped Laughingthrush Garrulax virgatus
Near Threatened. I saw a group of at least three individuals
near Farpak, Phawngpui National Park, on 1 4 April 2000.
Kaul et al. (1996) recorded this species in Murlen National
Park.
GREY Sibia Heterophasia gracilis
Near Threatened . Groups of 2-3 birds were seen in Murlen
and Phawngpui National Parks in February 200 1 and April
2000, and at least one individual was identified in a mixed-
species flock in Lengteng Wildlife Sanctuary in February
2001 . Kaul etal. (1996) found it to be common in Murlen
National Park and frequent in Phawngpui National Park.
Forest Wagtail Dendronanthus indicus
I observed at least ten singles on a dirt road between
Kolodyne bridge and Phura village (at 200-300 m) on 1 0
and 1 1 April 2000, and near the road between Rawlbuk
and Sangau on 1 2 April 2000. These were the first records
of the species for Mizoram.
House Sparrow Passer domesticus
This species is very rare in Mizoram, where Eurasian Tree
Sparrow Passer montanus is the common sparrow in most
places. Small numbers were observed in and around
Bhairabi in February 1987 and north of Vairengti (near
Lailapur) in April 2000.
CONSERVATION
Habitat destruction through jhum agriculture, logging,
clearance for settlements and cultivation in valleys, and
poisoning and blasting in the rivers for fishing are major
threats to Mizoram’s fauna. Closed-canopy forest (canopy
cover =40%) covered 62.6% of Mizoram in 1972-1975,
but deforestation decreased this to 52.9% in 1980-1982
and 20.6% in 1995 (NRSA 1983, FSI 1997). It increased
to 42% in 200 1 owing to development of plantations (FSI
2003). The ultimate cause of habitat destruction is the
very rapid growth of human population which increased
from 0.33 million in 1971 to 0.89 million in 2001
(Government of India 2001). While some species (e.g.
Kalij Pheasant, Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus and Mountain
Bamboo Partridge) can survive in degraded forest and
abandoned jhums , others cannot and have consequently
declined.
Owing to intensive hunting, some species (e.g. Mrs
Hume’s Pheasant and several hornbill species) have
disappeared from large parts of Mizoram. Species such as
the Grey Peacock Pheasant, Blyth’s Tragopan, Mrs
Hume’s Pheasant, hornbills, and Peregrine Falcon are
accorded the highest protection under the Schedule I of
Wild Life (Protection) Act of India. Most villagers are,
however, not aware of this legal status, and the legislation
is poorly enforced.
New protected areas should be designated in part of
Inner Line reserve forest (250 km2), Palak Dil (40 km2)
and Parva (50 km2). Smaller community-run sanctuaries
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
155
should he established near Ngur, North Diltlang and
Artlang. Existing protected areas should be extended at
Murlen, Ngengpui, Lengteng and Phawngpui. Within
protected areas there needs to be better control of poaching,
jhum cultivation and human-induced fires. Environmental
awareness programmes are needed in villages surrounding
protected areas. In view of the high rate of literacy (90%),
conservation awareness has better chances of succeeding
in Mizoram than in many other parts of India.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank forest officials for their assistance during the study,
including N. Pradhan (ACF, HQ), L. Pachuan, P. Lianzuala, Mr and
Mrs K. Hramzama, C. Buanga, C. Hranghimea, T. Zakiau, K. Kheilai,
Khudu Ray, Lalkung, Zarlansanga, Khaikhu, Lalnunzira, Sonadhar
Saikia, Muankima, Rinsanga and Vanlalpeka. I thank Ms Bawitei, P.
Rahlo, Mrs Nango, K. Vabeisia, Waukry, M. Goswami, John Paul, Jalal
Mazumdar, Amaruddin, Anil Goswami, Hakim, and the late Alauddin
Choudhury. I also thank Sirai Laskar, Sirai, Monai, Tomu and Mukut
for assistance during surveys along Assam-Mizoram border.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. Bombay, India: Oxford University Press.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world. CD-ROM.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Choudhury, A. U. (1996) On the trail of Blyth’s Tragopan. World
Pheasant Assoc. News 51: 14-16.
Choudhury, A. U. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati, India: Gibbon
Books and WWF-India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2002a) Survey of Mrs Hume ’s Pheasant in NE India.
Report No. 5. Guwahati, India: The Rhino Foundation for Nature
in NE India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2002b) Major inland wetlands of north-eastern India.
Coimbatore, India: Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural
History.
Choudhury, A. U. (2005) New sites for Mrs Hume’s Pheasant
Syrmaticus humiae in north-east India based on hunters’ specimens
and local reports. Forktail 21: 183-186.
FSI (1997) The state of the forest report 1997. Dehra Dun, India: Forest
Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest.
FSI (2003) The state of the forest report 2001 . Dehra Dun, India: Forest
Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest.
Ghose, D. and Thanga, L. (1998) Nesting of Blyth’s Tragopan.
Tragopan 8: 9.
Government of India (2001) Census of India 2001. New Delhi:
Government of India.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Islam, Z. and Rahmani, A. R., eds. (2004) Important Bird Areas in
India. Mumbai, India and Cambridge, U.K.: Bombay Natural
History Society and BirdLife International.
Katju, D. (1996) Pheasants in Mizoram, India: an impression. Tragopan
5: 9-10.
Kaul, R., Ahmed, A. and Katju, D. (1996) Wildlife studies in north¬
east India -IV [Mizoram] . Unpublished report. New Delhi: World
Pheasant Association (India).
Koelz, W. (1954) Ornithological studies. I. New birds from Iran,
Afghanistan, and India. Contrib. Inst. Regional Exploration 1: 1-32.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., da Fonseca, G and Kent,
J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature
403: 853-858.
NRSA ( 1 983) Mapping of forest cover in India from satellite imagery, 1 972-
75 and 1980-82. Summary Report: North Eastern States / Union
Territories. Hyderabad, India: National Remote Sensing Agency,
Government of India.
Rao, K. R. and Zoramthanga, R. (1976) Phenomenon of nocturnal
flights of some resident birds at Lunglei, Mizoram, NE India. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 75: 927-928.
Robertson, A. (1996) Mizoram: list of bird species observed.
Unpublished report.
Sangha, H. (2001) Notes on Longeared owl, Hume’s short-toed lark
and on Purple and Green cochoas in Mizoram. Neivsletter for
Birdwatchers 41(2): 27—28.
Shankar Raman, T. R. (1995) Shifting cultivation and conservation of
tropical forest bird communities in north-east India. Unpublished
report to Oriental Bird Club.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Anwaruddin Choudhury, Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate) , Baksa. Correspondence: 7 Islampur Road, Guwahati
781 007, Assam, India. Email: badml@sify.com
Plain-backed Thrush Zoothera mollissima:
first record for Bangladesh
M. MONIRUL H. KHAN
On 29 January 2006, at 16h00-16h30, Enam Talukder,
Zahangir Alom, Samiul Mohsanm and Dilip Das and I
observed a Plain-backed Thrush Zoothera mollissima at
Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
(23°52.58'N 90°16.19'E, 14 m).
For most of the duration of our observation, the thrush
was seen pecking on the ground around a narrow water
drain, at a distance of 15 m. We observed it using 10x
Nikon binoculars and photographed it. It then flew and
perched in a Ziziphus tree (6 m high), and then moved to
a rain tr eeAlbizia sp. (8 m high) before finally flying away.
The drain kept this area relatively wet and hence it was
covered by herbs (dominated by Tridax procumbens) and
shrubs. The weather conditions were sunny and calm.
156
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
We identified the bird as a Plain-backed Thrush from
the following combination of features. It had deep brown
upperparts, no wing-bars, white underparts with heavy
black scaling on the belly and flanks, a small dark patch
behind the eye, an indistinct elongated dark patch on
each side of the throat, a very narrow yellowish eye-ring,
a dark bill, pinkish legs and a relatively short tail.
There are five possible confusion species among the
Zoothera thrushes that occur in Bangladesh or in
neighbouring eastern India, Nepal and Bhutan: female
Siberian Thrush Z. sibirica , Long-tailed Thrush Z. dixoni ,
Scaly Thrush Z. dauma, Long-billed Thrush Z. monticola
and Dark-sided Thrush Z. marginata. The bird had the
diagnostic head pattern of Plain-backed Thrush, and had
a plain dark brown back and no wing-bars, eliminating
Long-tailed and Scaly Thrushes; prominent scaling on
the underparts, eliminating female Siberian and Long¬
billed Thrushes; and a relatively small bill, eliminating
Dark-sided Thrush.
Plain-backed Thrush is mostly resident at 2, 1 00-4,330
m in the Himalayas in India, Nepal and Bhutan, but it
visits the foothills at 450-2,700 m in winter (Grimmett et
al. 1998). The species had not previously been recorded
from Bangladesh (Husain 1 979, Khan 1 982, Harvey 1 990,
Thompson et al. 1993; Thompson and Johnson 1996,
2003; IUCN Bangladesh 2000, Grewal et al. 2002). The
record is about 240 km south-west from the nearest known
records in the Indian state of Meghalaya (Grimmett et al.
1998). Minimum altitudes for the species have been noted
as 1,500 m (Rasmussen and Anderton 2005), 600 m
(Grimmett etal. 1998) and 1,300 m (Ali and Ripley 1987).
At 14 m, our record is the lowest elevation at which the
species has ever been recorded. It is noteworthy that the
record was after the only spell of cold weather in the
winter of 2005-2006.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I thank Paul Thompson for comments and for confirming the
identification from photographs.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and
Sri Lanka. Second edition. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Grewal, B., Harvey, B. and Pfister, O. (2002) Birds of India including
Nepal, Sri Lanka, the Maldives, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Bhutan.
London: Christopher Helm.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Husain, K. Z. (1979) Birds of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Government of
Bangladesh.
IUCN Bangladesh (2000) Red book of threatened birds of Bangladesh.
Dhaka: IUCN.
Khan, M. A. R. (1982) Wildlife of Bangladesh: a checklist. Dhaka:
University of Dhaka.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Washington, D.C. and Barcelona, Spain: Smithsonian
Institute and Lynx Edicions.
Thompson, P. M., Harvey, W. G., Johnson, D. L., Millin, D. J.,
Rashid, S. M. A., Scott, D. A., Stanford, C. and Woolner, J. D.
(1993) Recent notable bird records from Bangladesh. Forktail 9:
12-44.
Thompson, P. M. and Johnson, D. L. (1996) Birding in Bangladesh:
a guide to birdwatching sites and a checklist of birds. Unpublished
report.
Thompson, P. M. and Johnson, D. L. (2003) Further notable bird
records from Bangladesh. Forktail 19: 85-102.
M. Monirul H. Khan, Department of Zoology, Jahangimagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh. Email:
mmhkhan@hotmail. com
Spring migration of Oriental Honey-buzzards
Pernis ptilorhyncus and other raptors at
TanjungTuan, Malaysia, 2000-2001
ROBERT DECANDIDO, DEBORAH ALLEN and KEITH L. BILDSTEIN
Since the 1950s, it has been known that wintering
populations of Oriental Honey-buzzards Pernis ptilorhyncus
and at least four other raptor species migrate each spring
from Sumatra north-east across the Straits of Malacca to
the west coast of Malaysia (Oakeley 1955, White 1961,
Medway and Nisbet 1964, 1965, Medway and Wells 1976,
Wells 1990a, 1990b). This migration is part of the East
Asian Flyway, with most birds presumably returning to
breed in the region from western China and southern
Siberia east to Japan (McClure 1 998, Zalles and Bildstein
2000, DeCandido et al. 2004a, b, Higuchi et al. 2005).
However, the magnitude, timing and duration of the
migration of Oriental Honey-buzzard and other species
using this route remain unclear (Wells 1999, Zalles and
Bildstein 2000) . Here we report results from counts made
in March 2000 and 2001.
STUDY SITE
Port Dickson (2°24'N 101°5LE, 0 m) is a small town on
the west coast of Malaysia on the Straits of Malacca. It is
c.94 km south-west of Kuala Lumpur and 90 km north of
the city of Melaka (Figs. 1-2). The town is located at the
southern end of a range of mountains that runs north-
south and presumably funnels many migrants along the
western coastal lowlands of the Malay Peninsula (Medway
and Nisbet 1965, Wells 1999). The watch site is situated
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
157
on the deck of a lighthouse, south of Port Dickson at km
16, c.3 km west of the coastal highway, and is known
locally as Tanjung Tuan. The lighthouse is surrounded
by coastal evergreen rainforest in a small, protected
forest reserve. On clear days it is possible to see Sumatra
c.38 km across the Straits of Malacca to the south-west.
From Tanjung Medang on the island of Pulau Rupat of
north-western Sumatra to Tanjung Tuan is the shortest
distance over the sea along the length of the Straits of
Malacca (Zalles and Bildstein 2000) . Weather conditions
typically were hazy or cloudy with little wind in the
morning until lOhOO, then becoming clear but humid.
On many days a 3-15 km/h sea breeze from the west or
north-west developed at c. 1 0h45. Occasionally, the wind
direction and speed changed significantly in subsequent
hours.
METHODS
Migrating raptors were counted during early to mid-March
in 2000 and 2001 by RDC and DA using 8.5x and 10x
binoculars. In 2000, 1 04 hours of observations were made
on 15 days (8-22 March). In 2001, observations were
made for 68 hours on 1 1 days (2- 1 2 March) . Observations
typically began at 09h00-10h00 and usually ended by
17h00. On nine occasions in 2000, and four occasions in
2001, we left the count site at 15h00 because fewer than
25 migrant raptors had been counted after 12h00. RDC
identified, counted, and recorded the numbers and species
of raptors seen, while DA assisted, acting primarily as a
spotter while photographing the migration (see Porter et
al. 1986, Inskipp etal. 1996, Clark 1999, Jeyarajasingham
and Pearson 1999). Over 99% of raptors were readily
identified to species. Both observers scanned mainly to
the west across the Straits of Malacca in the direction of
Sumatra. An individual raptor was considered to be a
migrant if we observed it pass west-east across an
imaginary north-south line, and continued east and out
of sight past the lighthouse and nearby hills. We defined
a flock of migrating raptors as any group of at least two
individuals making landfall within 100 m and five minutes
of one another. Wind direction was measured using a
weathervane mounted atop the lighthouse and a hand¬
held compass. Ambient wind speed was estimated from
experience: it could not be measured directly at the watch
site because the configuration of the lighthouse blocked
or deflected wind currents on the lighthouse deck.
To examine the diurnal timing of Oriental Honey-
buzzard migration, we included data from counts taken
in 1998 (45.5 hours during 2-8 March) and 1999 (35
hours during 1-5 March 1999) by Lim Aun Tiah of the
Malaysian Nature Society (MNS). We used %2 tests to
examine the significance of variation in arrival times.
Figure 2. Location of Tanjung Tuan, Malaysia (1) relative to other
important raptor migration watch sites in East Asia: Selangor Plains,
Malaysia (2); Chumphon, Thailand (3); SaPa, Vietnam (4); Beidaihe,
China (5); Uchiyama-toge, Nagasaki, Japan (6); Kohyamacho,
Kagoshima, Japan (7); Miyako Islands (Ryukyus), Okinawa, Japan
(8); Renting National Park, Taiwan (9); and Bali Barat National Park,
Indonesia (10). See DeCandido et al. (2004b) for further details.
158
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
RESULTS
In total, 1 1 ,442 migrating raptors were counted in 2000-
2001 (an average rate of 66.5 birds/hour). In 2000, we
counted 3,188 migrant raptors (30.7 birds/hour): 2,519
Oriental Honey-buzzards, 561 Black Bazas Aviceda
leuphotes, 30 Chinese Goshawks Accipitersoloensis, 1 8 Grey¬
faced Buzzards Butastur indicus and five Japanese
Sparrowhawks Accipiter gularis, plus 55 unidentified
individuals. In 2001, we counted 8,254 migrant raptors
(121 birds/hour): 8,129 Oriental Honey-buzzards, 47
Black Bazas, 32 Chinese Goshawks, 30 Grey-faced
Buzzards and seven Japanese Sparrowhawks, plus nine
unidentified individuals. Additional migrating raptors,
almost all likely to have been Oriental Honey-buzzards,
were seen by other observers making landfall along the
Malaysian coast north and south of the watch site during
our study, but these are not included in our totals.
Oriental Honey-buzzard was the most common
migrant, making up 93% of migrating raptors in 2000-
2001, followed by Black Baza (5.3%), with Chinese
Goshawk, Grey-faced Buzzard and Japanese
Sparrowhawk comprising the remainder. We recorded
five other raptor species that we assumed to be resident:
Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus, Brahminy Kite
Haliastur indus. White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus
leucogaster. Changeable Hawk Eagle Spizaetus cirrhatus
and Black-thighed Falconet Microhierax fringillarius .
In 1998-2001, Oriental Honey-buzzards were
significantly more likely to be seen during 1 Ih00-13h00
than at other times of day (59% of records, (%2=3751.4,
03
D
-g
>
~o
c
o
0
-Q
E
it
6000 -I
5000 -
4000 -
3000 -
2000 -
1000 -
o I
o
o
.c
CO
Figure 3. Diurnal pattern of Oriental Honey-buzzard Pemis ptilorhyncus
migration at Tanjung Tuan, Malaysia, during 1998-2001.
80
2-25 26-50 51-100 101-250 251-500
Flock size (number of individuals)
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of migrant Oriental Honey-buzzard
Perms ptilorhyncus flocks at Tanjung Tuan, Malaysia in 2000-2001.
d.f.— 1 , P=0.001, Fig. 3). Like Wells (1999), we found
that the Oriental Honey-buzzard migration was usually
concentrated into a 4-5 hour period after the arrival of the
first wave of migrants, and few individuals were seen after
this time. On the eight days in 2000-2001 on which we
counted more than 1 00 Oriental Honey-buzzards per day,
the first arrivals were at llh08 on average (standard
deviation=35.9 min).
The majority of Oriental Honey-buzzards (96.7%)
made landfall during light to moderate (< 1 5 km/h) winds.
When winds exceeded 20 km/h, we did not observe any
migrating raptors making landfall. Over 99% of Oriental
Honey-buzzards were recorded in flocks (184 flocks in
total), and just 14 individuals were recorded migrating
alone. Mean flock size was 57.7 individuals, and the
maximum was 388 individuals. The highest single hour
total of Oriental Honey-buzzards was 841 at 1 Ih00-12h00
on 9 March 200 1 .
The maximum daily count of Black Bazas was 325
individuals (in one flock) on 17 March 2000. The period
in which migrants were recorded was 2 March-22 March
for Oriental Honey-buzzard, 9 March-2 1 March for Black
Baza, 2 March-21 March for Chinese Goshawk, 2-21
March for Japanese Sparrowhawk and 2-17 March for
Grey-faced Buzzard.
Most (>75%) Oriental Honey-buzzards and all
individuals of the other four species were observed
migrating eastwards within 300 m of the watch site. All
migrants arrived from below eye-level to a maximum height
of 30 m. Oriental Honey-buzzards were often first seen
low in flapping flight over the sea as they attempted to
gain altitude about 500 m from shore. Black Baza and
Chinese Goshawk were only observed arriving in gliding
flight in flocks at a height of c.30 m.
DISCUSSION
Our observations confirm previous records of significant
numbers of migrant raptors at Tanjung Tuan, e.g. L. A.
Tiah (in litt. 2002) counted 5,093 migrating Oriental
Honey-buzzards (112 birds/hour) in early March 1998,
and 1,040 (63.7 birds/hour) in early March 1999. Our
maximum hourly totals also accord with previous records:
680 individuals/hour on 3 March 1964 (Medway and
Nisbet 1 965), 670 on 2 March 1998 and 616 on 4 March
1998 (L. A. Tiah in lit:. 2002).
We observed the largest daily numbers of Oriental
Honey-buzzards in early March. Since 1955, daily totals
of Oriental Honey Buzzards at Tanjung Tuan exceeded
1,000 individuals on: 1 March 1987 (2,76 1:J. M.Thiollay
quoted in Wells 1999), 2 March 1998 (1,516: L. A. Tiah
in litt. 2002), 2 March 2001 (1,758: this study), 3 March
2001 (1,285: this study), 4 March 1983 (1,552: see Wells
1990a), 4 March 1998 (1,1 15: L. A. Tiah in litt. 2002), 6
March 2001 (1,222: this study), 15 March 2000 (1,136:
this study), 26 March 1964 (1,200: see Medway and Nisbet
1965) and 27 March 1964 (1,602: see Medway and Nisbet
1965). The first Oriental Honey-buzzard migrants of the
season have been seen as early as late January (Medway
and Wells 1976) to 13 February (Oakeley 1955), and as
late as 2 April (White 1961, Wells 1990a), and 3 April
further south over Singapore (Hurrell 1961).
Other authors have recorded earlier and later dates of
migrant raptors than those we recorded, reflecting the
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
159
limited duration of our visits. Wells (1999) noted the
earliest Chinese Goshawks around Tanjung Tuan on 3
February, and the latest on 1 5 April, while C. Nualsri {in
litt. 2005) recorded 84% of individuals of this species at
Chumphon, Thailand, during 28-30 March 2005. Wells
(1999) recorded Japanese Sparrowhawk at Tanjung Tuan
from 1 5 February to early May, with peak passage on 2 1
March-15 April. For Black Baza, 96% of migrants were
seen during 16-30 March at Chumphon, Thailand (C.
Nualsri in litt. 2005) . For Grey-faced Buzzard, the earliest
migrants at Hulu Klang (Selangor) near Kuala Lumpur
were on 1 7 February 2006 (M. Chong in litt. 2006), while
migration peaked in early to mid-March at Chumphon,
with 79% of individuals during 8-19 March in 2005 (C.
Nualsri in litt. 2005).
Five additional raptor species have been recorded
migrating at the site: Osprey Pandion haliaetus , Black¬
shouldered Kite, Black Kite Milvus migrans. Eastern
Marsh Harrier Circus ( aeruginosus) spilonotus and Common
Buzzard Buteo buteo (Wells 1990a, 1999, Zalles and
Bildstein 2000). Non-raptor migrants (including Blue¬
tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus and Blue-throated Bee-
eaters M. viridis) have been described elsewhere
(DeCandido et al. 2004a, c).
Our findings with regard to wind direction and wind
speed in relation to raptor migration generally agree with
Wells (1990a, 1999). Usually, raptors made landfall
nearest the lighthouse when winds were light and had a
westerly component. When westerly winds exceeded 10
km/h, greater numbers of migrating raptors were
sometimes counted 6 km south at Kampung Segenting
(L. A. Tiah in litt. 2002) . When winds were north-easterly,
raptors tended to drift further north up the coast. However
in early March, light winds from other directions
occasionally produced significant numbers of migrating
honey-buzzards: during 14h00-l 5h00 on 2 March 2001,
we counted 809 Oriental Honey-buzzards on east-north¬
east winds of 2-10 km/h. The following day with similar
winds, we counted 377 honey-buzzards during 1 lhOO-
12h00, with much of the migration passing to the north.
When winds switched to south-south-east by 13h00, we
counted 801 honey-buzzards, mostly passing to the south.
Our observations of the diurnal timing of raptor
migration, which showed a clear peak at 1 Ih00-13h00
(Fig. 3), closely agree with thoseofWells (1990a). Possible
explanations for this peak include: (a) the location of
appropriate roosting areas in north-eastern Sumatra; (b)
the timing of the onset of thermals in coastal Sumatra;
and (c) the timing of changes in meteorological conditions,
especially wind direction and speed, at Tanjung Tuan.
All of these warrant additional investigation, as do the
factors that initiate movements of particularly large
numbers Oriental Honey-buzzards. Compared to Agostini
et al. (2005), who found that 82% of Eurasian Honey-
buzzard Pemis apivorus flocks crossed the Tyrrhenian Sea
from Cape Bon (Tunisia) to mainland Italy during 1 2h00-
15h00, we found that the majority of Oriental Honey-
buzzard flocks (52%) made landfall from 1 Ih00-13h00.
The difference was probably because the European birds
had to make a much longer (>150 km) sea crossing.
The total numbers of migrant raptors each year at
Tanjung Tuan is still not known, because observations
have only been for only relatively brief periods of time per
season (single day counts in the 1950s, three days in 1 964,
six days in 1983, and 15 days in 2000 and 11 days in
2001). On 3-6 March 2001, MNS members formed a
north-south team of observers (an ‘interception line’)
stationed along the coast stretching from 6 km south of
the T anjung T uan at Kampung Segenting to the northern
part of Port Dickson town. They found that 28% (of
4,302) migrating Oriental Honey-buzzards made landfall
north and south of Tanjung Tuan. Based on these data,
the totals we counted, and the limited duration of our
observations in the two seasons, we estimate that 1 0,000-
20,000 Oriental Honey-buzzards make the crossing from
Sumatra to the west coast of Malaysia each spring. By
comparison, Medway and Wells (1976) estimated that
c. 1 80,000 Oriental Honey-buzzards migrated south over
west peninsular Malaysia in autumn 1963. Recent
observations in spring at Tanjung Tuan suggest daily
maxima of 1,500-1,800 individuals are likely atTanjung
4'uan, with both historical and recent counts indicating
that the peak of the Oriental Honey-buzzard migration is
likely to be in early March. Overall, the number of
Oriental Honey-buzzards counted at Tanjung Tuan are
similar to spring counts of migrating Eurasian Honey-
buzzards making long (> 1 5 km) sea crossings at Italy and
Gibraltar (Giordano 1991, Agostini 1992, Zalles and
Bildstein 2000), and recent autumn migration counts of
Oriental Honey-buzzards in Thailand (DeCandido et al.
2004b).
We recommend the following: (1) a season-long count
from mid-February to mid-May should be conducted by
experienced observer(s) in order to determine the
magnitude of the migration of all raptor species; (2) in
early March, a north-south ‘interception line’ of observers
perpendicular to the line of migration should be set up
from several kilometres north of the lighthouse in Port
Dickson to several kilometres south of the lighthouse in
order to validate the percentage of migrants that are not
observed from Tanjung Tuan; (3) a ringing programme
should be established to determine the condition, age
and sex of individuals arriving through the season; (4) a
watch site should be set up in a highly accessible location
(e.g. the grounds of a hotel) near T anjung T uan, coinciding
with demonstrations involving captive birds of prey. Most
people in Malaysia are unaware of the great diversity of
migrant species that pass through their country in spring
and autumn. Using the spectacle of raptor migration at
Tanjung Tuan combined with live, captive birds of prey
affords a significant opportunity to make many influential
people aware of this annual phenomenon in the area of
Port Dickson.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
W e dedicate this research to the late Laurence Poh and his wife, Audrey.
We greatly appreciate the encouragement and thoughtful advice of
members of the Malaysian Nature Society including Ooi Beng Yean
and Liew Siew Lan, Chiu Sein Chiong and Regina Anthony, Cheang
Kum Seng, Dr. Chan Kai Soon, Mike Chong, Lim Aun Tiah and Lim
Kim Chye. Chukiat Nualsri provided information regarding spring
migrating raptors near Chumphon, Thailand. Anne Arrowsmith
designed the maps. David Wells provided many helpful comments and
ideas. William Duckworth critically read the manuscript and directed
us to historical information about bird migration in South-East Asia.
We wish to acknowledge the hospitality shown to us by members of the
Tanjung Tuan lighthouse staff. This is Hawk Mountain Sanctuary
Contribution to Conservation Science number 132.
160
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
REFERENCES
Agostini, N. (1992) Spring migration of Honey Buzzards ( Pemis
apivoms) at the Straits of Messina in relation to atmospheric
conditions. J. Raptor Research 26: 93-96.
Agostini, N., Panuccio, M. and Massa, B. 2005. Flight behaviour of
Honey Buzzards ( Pemis apivorus ) during spring migration over the
sea. Buteo 14: 3-9.
Clark, W. S. (1999) A field guide to the raptors of Europe, the Middle East
and North Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.
DeCandido, R., Allen, D. A and Yosef, R. (2004a) Merops migration
at T anjung T uan, Malaysia: an important spring bee-eater migration
watch site in Southeast Asia. J. Y amashina Inst. Om. 36: 15-21.
DeCandido, R., Nualsri, C. N., Allen, D. A. and Bildstein, K. L.
(2004b) Autumn 2003 raptor migration at Chumphon, Thailand:
a globally significant raptor migration watch site in South-East
Asia. Forktail 20: 41-47.
DeCandido R., Allen, D. A. and Bildstein, K. L. (2004c) A comparison
of spring migration phenology of bee-eaters and Oriental Honey-
buzzards Perms ptilorhyncus at Tanjung Tuan, Malaysia, 2000-01 .
Ardea 92: 169-174.
Giordano, A. (1991) The migration of birds of prey and storks in the
Straits of Messina. Birds of Prey Bull. 4: 239-250.
Higuchi, H., Shiu, H. J., Nakamura, H., Uematsu, A., Kuno, K.,
Saeki, M., Hotta, M., Tokita, K. I., Moriya, E., Morishita, E. and
Tamura, M. (2005) Migration of Honey-buzzards Pemis apivorus
based on satellite tracking. Om. Sci. 4: 109-115.
Hurrell, L. H. (1961) Migration and movements ofbirds of prey over
Singapore. Bull. Nat. Mus. Singapore 30: 97-100.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Jeyarajasingham, A. and Pearson, A. (1999) Afield guide to the birds of
West Malaysia and Singapore. New York: Oxford University Press.
McClure, H.E. (1998) Migration and survival of the birds of Asia. Revised
edition. Bangkok: White Lotus Press.
Medway, L. and Nisbet, I. C. T. (1964) Bird report: 1963. Malayan
Nature J. 18: 133-171.
Medway, L. and Nisbet, I. C. T. (1965) Bird report: 1964. Malayan
Nature J. 19:160-194.
Medway, L. and Wells, D.R. (1976) The birds of the Malay peninsula.
Vol. 5. Conclusion, and survey of every species. London: H. F. & G.
Witherby.
Oakely, R. N. (1955) Migrating hawk-eagles. Malayan Nature J. 10:
163-64.
Porter, R. F., Willis, L., Christensen, S. and Nielsen, B. P. (1986)
Flight identification guide to European raptors. 3rd ed. Calton, U.K:
T. and A. D. Poyser.
Wells, D. R. (1990a) Malayan bird report: 1982 and 1983. Malayan
Nature J. 43: 116-147.
Wells, D. R. (1990b) Malayan bird report: 1986 and 1987. Malayan
Nature J. 43: 172 185.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Tlmi-Malay peninsula. London,
U. K: Academic Press.
White, D. H. S. (1961) Migrating raptores. Malayan Nature J. 15: 181.
Zalles, J. I. and Bildstein, K. L. (2000) Raptor watch: global directory
of raptor migration sites. Cambridge, U.K. and Kempton, U.S.A.:
BirdLife International and Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Robert DeCandido, Acopian Center for Conservation Learning, Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, 410 Summer Valley Road,
Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania 17961 U.S.A. Correspondence: 1831 Fowler Avenue, The Bronx, New York 10462-3708
U.S.A. Email: rdcny@earthlink.net
Deborah Allen, P.O. Box 1452 Peter Stuyvesant Station, New York 10009 U.S.A. Email: dallenyc@earthlink.net
Keith L. Bildstein, Acopian Center for Conservation Learning, Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, 410 Summer Valley Road,
Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania 17961 U.S.A. Email: bildstein@hawkmtn.org
New and significant records from Dehra Dun valley
and adjacent hills, lower Garhwal Himalayas, India:
May 2002-March 2006
ARUN P. SINGH
Ornithological records from Dehra Dun valley and
adjacent hills in Dehra Dun district (30°04-45,N
77035'-78°l 5'E) in Uttaranchal state, India, have been
previously published by Osmaston (1935), Wright (1955),
George (1957), Fleming (1967), Pandey et. al (1994),
Mohan (1997), Gandhi and Singh (1995), Tak et al.
(1997), Singh (2000, 2002) and Singh et al. (2001). A
checklist of the birds of Dehra Dun and adjacent hills,
compiled by Bikram Grewal in 2002 and revised in 2003
by the author is also available (at http://64.6.246. 1 14/
checklists/Uttaranchal/checklists_dehradoon.htm), but
this is not authoritative and contains a number of highly
improbable records.
Until recently, a few areas lying in the eastern part of
the valley had remained practically unexplored
ornithologically. These were mainly inaccessible, dense,
wet patches of tropical moist deciduous forests, some
dominanted by sal Shorea robusta trees, at 800-1,000 m.
These included Kalu Sidh Temple along the Song river
in Thano range, Kansrao-Satyanarayan tract in Rajaji
National Park, Chowki and Rikhauli.
Monthly surveys of 3-10 days each, totalling 257 days
from May 2002 to March 2006, were undertaken focusing
on these areas in the valley. A total of 1 96 days during the
same period were spent surveying the Asan river and Asan
Barrage. Observations were also carried out on a 40-km
road transect in the adjoining hills of Mussoorie, through
Jawaladavi Temple, Benog, Everest Elouse, Hathiapaw,
Mussoorie, Jharipani, Kincraig, Bataghat, Suwakholi,
Buraskhanda and Dhanaulti on 95 days in the same period.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
161
Finally 10-day treks in May-June 2003 and 2004 treks
were undertaken in the inner Jaunsar hills of Chakarata-
Deoban, Tiuni and the north-west corner of the district
adjoining Himachal Pradesh.
Here I give details of significant new records, i.e. those
of threatened or Near Threatened species (as listed by
BirdLifeInternationalatwww.birdlife.org/datazone), first
or second records for Uttaranchal state, and significant
range extensions. Images of those species noted as
being photographed can be viewed at http://
www.orientalbirdimages.org.
Table 1. Coordinates of sites mentioned in text.
RESULTS
Great Bittern Botaums stellaris
An adult was observed and photographed feeding in
reedbeds, hiding when alarmed and later flying away at
Asan Barrage on 1 3 January 2006. This is the first record
from Uttaranchal state of this uncommon winter migrant
to India.
GLOSSY Ibis Plegadis falcinellus
A large flock of 121 individuals was counted flying east
over New Forest campus at a height of c.50 m at 16h50
on 20 October 2003. Some individuals interspersed bouts
of flapping with short glides. Their relatively smaller size,
legs extending beyond the tail, and lack of white shoulder
patches distinguished them from Black Ibis Pseudibis
paspillosa which also occurs in the area. The species is
otherwise only known in Uttaranchal state from Corbett
Tiger Reserve (Sharma et al. 2003).
Fulvous Whistling-duck Dendrocygna bicolor
Four individuals were observed on 10 October 2003 as
they flew from the eastern bank of Asan Barrage. The
flight was low and straight; one individual gave a clear
loud pew-ee call during flight. They landed c. 1 00 m away
on a stony bank on the west central part of the Barrage.
While landing the buffy-white uppertail-coverts were seen.
They appeared to be larger than Fulvous Whistling-duck
D. javanica, which is a summer migrant to Asan Barrage.
The species is otherwise only known in Uttaranchal state
from Corbett Tiger Reserve, where it was recorded as a
‘very rare resident through out the park’ during 1977-
1979 (Lamba 1980, 1987).
Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri
Vulnerable. A male was observed and photographed
swimming in a flock of GadwalMwas strepera and Common
Coot Fulica atra along the south-west marshes of Asan
Barrage (situated at the confluence of Asan and Yamuna
rivers) on 1 1 December 2002. It had characteristically
white undertail-coverts, foreflanks and belly, extending to
above the water surface unlike Ferruginous Pochard
A. nyroca. The head showed a distinct greenish gloss,
contrasting with the chestnut breast, and a white iris
was glimpsed. The bird appeared smaller than Gadwall.
This is the first record of this species from Uttaranchal
state.
White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albidlla
A juvenile was recorded feeding on the Asan riverbed
between Herbertpur town and Asan Barrage on 23
February 2004. It had streaking on the throat and chest;
the gape ended below the eye, and bill was black with a
yellow base. After ten minutes it flew away, and soared
with four Egyptian Vultures Nephron percnopterus and a
juvenile Steppe Eagl eAquila nipalensis. In flight, the wedge-
shaped tail was visible from above and below; it was white
except for darker feather margins. The wings appeared
very broad in flight compared to the Steppe Eagle. The
species is otherwise only known in Uttaranchal state from
Corbett Tiger Reserve (Sharma et al. 2003).
Cheer Pheasant Camus wallichii
Vulnerable . A covey of at least five individuals was recorded
feeding on steep rocky slopes at 2, 200 m in a mixed patch
of pine and oaks above Jhitad village, near Tiuni on the
Uttaranchal-Himachal Pradesh state border, on 9 May
2004. The long barred tail of the male was clearly seen
from 30 m before the birds disappeared down the slope.
It has previously been recorded in the area near Chakarata
(Osmaston 1935, Srivastava 1977) and at Mussoorie
(Fleming 1967), where it was described as rare.
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa
Near Threatened. Two individuals were seen flying
together over the Asan Barrage reservoir for five minutes
after being disturbed by a Eurasian Marsh Harrier Circus
aeruginosus on 27 August 2003. The white wing-bar and
rump, broad black band, legs trailing well behind the tail
and longish beak were noted. The species is otherwise
only known in Uttaranchal state from Corbett Tiger
Reserve (Sharma et al. 2003).
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata
One individual was observed twice at Asan Barrage on 1 6
and 18 January 2004. On the first occasion it was seen
initially in flight and then settling on fallow land alongside
the Yamuna canal. On the second occasion it was
photographed in a flock of over 100 Ruddy Shelduck
Tadomaferruginea on a mudflat in the central part of Asan
Barrage. The species is otherwise only known in
Uttaranchal state from Corbett Tiger Reserve (Sharma et
al. 2003).
Terek Sandpiper Xenus cinereus
One individual was observed for five minutes feeding on
sandy banks alongside Red-wattled Lapwings Vanellus
indicus and Black-winged Stilts Himantopus himantopus at
Asan Barrage on 20 October 2002. It was the size of a
Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus and had short orange-
yellow legs and an upturned beak with an orangey base.
There has only been one previous record of this species
from Uttaranchal state, in 1967 atRoorkee (George 1968).
162
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Wood Snipe Gallinago nemoricola
Vulnerable. One was recorded in a small (50 m diameter)
swamp covered with grass and water hyacinth in a patch
of sal forest at Jhajra at 650 m on 1 5 December 2004. On
approaching it flushed, rose laboriously and landed on the
top of a bush ten metres away. It had boldly barred darkish
underparts. Osmaston (1935) recorded this species in the
area in swampy patches near the forest edge.
Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica
Two adults in non-breeding plumage were seen flying
over Asan Barrage reservoir for 25 minutes on 26 August
2003 and for 40 minutes on 27 August 2003. These
medium-sized terns were identified by their distinctly
short, thick, all-black bill, and dark smudge through the
eye on an otherwise all-white head. The species is otherwise
only known in Uttaranchal state from Corbett Tiger
Reserve (Sharma et al. 2003).
GREY-BELLIED TESIA Tesia cyaniventer
This species was seen five times: ( 1 ) on 1 9 February 2003,
in Jhajra sal forest at 650 m, a ti-tu-chewit-chewit call was
repeatedly heard in undergrowth in sal forest and a bird
was seen briefly; (2) on 1 7 February 2004, in wet swamp
forest at Kalusidh Temple, Kaluwala, Thano at 600 m,
one was glimpsed and its plain green upperparts and head,
and light grey underparts were seen; (3) on 25 October
2004 one was heard calling at the same site; (4) on 29
October 2004 a tii-ti-ti-ti-ti-tu -chiyou call was heard along
a stream with thick cover in forest at Karvapani; and (5)
on 31 October 2004, one was heard and eventually seen
well at Kalusidh Temple, with the whitish centre of the
belly and dark eye-stripe noted. The species is rare at
Corbett Tiger Reserve (Sharma etal. 2003) ; these records
extend the known range westwards by c. 100 km.
WHITE-RUMPED NEEDLETAIL Zoonavena sylvatica
Small parties numbering 3-40 individuals were seen and
flying overhead over rocky slopes with mixed patches of
ban oak Quercus leucotrichophora near Chakarata at 2,200
m on 30 June 2003. They flew rapidly with short glides,
calling chick-chick and were identified by the blackish
upperparts, white rump, small size, and contrasting whitish
lower belly and undertail-coverts merging into the greyish-
brown breast. This species was previously known from
Almora and Pithoragarh districts in Kumaon Himalayas
at 2,400 m (Sultana and Khan 2000), but this record
extends the known range 210 km to the west.
Large WOODSHRIKE Tephrodomis gularis
One male and a probable female were photographed on
3 June 2003 in dense wet forest near Kalu Sidh Temple,
Thano near the river Song. The birds were larger than
Common Woodshrike T. pondicerianus. The male had
plain pinkish-tinged white underparts, uniform brown
upperparts, whitish-grey crown and nape, a dark mask
through the eye, a typical shrike-like black bill, and light
grey legs. The second individual was similar, but the lower
mandible had a paler base, the crown was brownish, the
nape was concolorous with the mantle, and the black
mask had a whitish-grey upper border. Subsequently, a
pair was recorded in a mixed-species flock, calling kizv-
kiw-kiw-kew-kizo in the canopy of sal forest at ‘Cheering
Crossing gate’ near Phanduwala in Rajaji National Park
on 1 June 2004. The species is also known from Corbett
Tiger Reserve (Sharma et al. 2003), but these records
extend the known range westwards by c.100 km.
RUFOUS-FRONTED PRINIA Prinia buchanani
Three were seen and one photographed foraging in the dry
Typha grass at Asan Barrage on 8 February 2006 . The species
is common further south in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and
Punjab (Grimmett et al. 1 998, Kazmierczak 2000), and had
previously been reported from Corbett Tiger Reserve
(Sharma etal. 2003) in Uttaranchal, but this record extends
the range across the Shiwaliks into Dehra Dun valley.
Tytler’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus tytleri
Near Threatened. This species was recorded on 4 and 1 5
March 2006 at Guniyal village along the Tons river, feeding
on flowering Erythrina suberosa and Callistemon lanceolatum.
Another was recorded in flowering Rhododendron arboreum
temperate forest at Hathipaw, Mussoorie, on 19 March
2006. Fleming (1967) took two specimens from
Mussoorie, one in February and the other in October.
PADDYFIELD Warbler Acrocephalus agricola
One individual was watched for 15 minutes and
photographed feeding in reeds at the southern edge of
Asan Barrage reservoir on 18 November 2005. It had a
short bill with a well-defined dark tip to the lower mandible,
which was pale in colour. The upperparts were rufescent,
the flanks were warm brown and the prominent
supercilium broadened behind the eye, unlike Blyth’s Reed
Warbler A. dumetorum. This is the first record from
Uttaranchal state of this winter migrant to India.
DISCUSSION
With these new additions a total of 551 species are now
confirmed for Dehra Dun district, which is c.40% of the
total number found in the Indian subcontinent. This list
includes 1 1 globally threatened species and 1 1 Near
Threatened species, representing c.15% of the total
number of such species found in the Indian subcontinent.
Dehra Dun valley may be an important stopover for
many migratory birds that briefly halt here while migrating
south (in autumn passage) to winter in the Indian
mainland, and while returning north (in spring passage)
to their breeding grounds in the Palaearctic region.
The present records include at least three significant
westward range extensions of species that are known from
the central Himalayas and further east.
REFERENCES
Fleming, R. L., Jr. (1967) The birds of Mussoorie, U.P., India: a
distributional and ecological study. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Gandhi, S. S. and Singh, S. I-C. (1995) Avifauna of Asan Barrage.
Cheetal 34(1): 29-34.
George, J. (1957) Birds of New Forest. Indian Forester 83: 674-737.
George, J. (1968) Bird Watchers’ Field Club of Roorkee. Newsletter for
Birdwatchers 8(3): 3.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
Subcontinent. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kazmierczak, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of the Indian Subcontinent.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
163
Lamba, B. S. (1980) Impact assessment of Bio-ecological changes in the
faunal patterns (selected groups) brought about by the partial submersion
of Corbett National Park, as a result of Ramganga multipurpose hydel
project dam 1st stage 1976-1979. Technical Report, Part I. Calcutta:
UNESCO Programme on Man and the Biosphere, Zoological Survey
of India.
Lamba, B.S. (1987) Fauna of Corbett National Park: mammals, birds and
reptiles. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India.
Mohan, D. (1997) Birds of New Forest, Dehra Dun, India. Forktail 12:
19-30.
Osmaston, B. B. (1935) Birds of Dehra Dun and adjacent hills. Indian
Military Acad. J. Supplement.
Pandey, S., Joshua, J., Rai, N. D., Mohan, D., Rawat, G. S., Sankar,
K., Katu, M. V., Khati, D. V. S. and Johnsingh, A. J. T. (1995)
Birds of Rajaji National Park, India. Forktail 10: 105-113.
Sharma, M., Harvey, B., Devasar, N. and Grewal, G. (2003) A checklist
of the birds of Corbett Tiger Reserve. Ramnnagar, India: Corbett Tiger
Reserve.
Singh, A. P. (2000) Birds of Lower Garhwal Himalayas: Dehra Dun
valley and neighbouring hills. Forktail 16: 101-123.
Singh, A. P., Gandhi S. S. and Singh S. K. (2001 ) Birdwatching areas:
Asan Barrage and adjoining sal forests of Timli, Dehra Dun valley,
Northern India. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 34: 42-46.
Singh, A. P. (2002) New and significant birds records from Dehra
Dun valley, lower Garhwal Himalayas, India. Forktail 18: 151 —
153.
Srivastava, P. C. (1977) Working plan for Chakarata Forest Division,
Tehri Circle, U.P. (1977-78 to 1986-87). Parts I and II. Nainital:
Uttar Pradesh State Forest Department.
Sultana, A. and Khan, J. A. (2000) Birds of oak forests in the Kumaon
Himalayas, Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 16: 131-146.
Tak, P. C., Sati, J. P. and Kumar, A. (1997) Waterfowl potential of
Asan reservoir (Dehra Dun valley, India). Zoologie 5(2): 1 1 1-1 32.
Wright, M. D. (1957) Notes on the birds of a selected area of Dehra
Dun. June 1946-December 1950. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 54:
627-662.
Arun P. Singh, Entomology Division, Forest Research Institute, P. O. New Forest, Dehra Dun, Uttaranchal, India-248006.
E-mail: singhap@icfre. org; arunpsinghranote@yahoo. com
First observation of an advertisement display flight
of ‘Steere’s Honey-buzzard’ Pernis (celebensis)
steerei on Panay, Philippines
G. GEWERS, E. CURIO and S. H. HEMBRA
On the basis of DNA analysis, Gamauf and Haring (2004)
proposed that Barred Honey-buzzard Pernis celebensis be
split into P. celebensis of Sulawesi, P. steerei steerei of
Mindanao and adjacent islands and P. s. winkleri of Luzon
and Polillo islands in the Philippines. Ferguson-Lees and
Christie (2005) proposed the name Steere’s Honey-
buzzard for P. steerei , and this nomenclature is followed
here. Compared to Barred Honey-buzzard, Steere’s
Honey-buzzard has a longer crest, lighter brown
upperparts, thinner streaks on a paler neck, and weaker
chestnut barring on the underparts. Seen from below, the
underwing-coverts and remiges are much paler and less
sharply barred, and the tail is less boldly banded. Some
juvenile males have distinctively plain white or cream-
coloured underparts (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2005).
On 1 1 April 2004, while hiking from Research Station
Sibaliw, Municipality of Buruanga, Aklan Province, to
Mt Banderahan (also called Mt Tinayunga, 917 m), the
highest elevation in the north-west Panay peninsula, we
observed a Steere’s Honey-buzzard. We watched it at a
distance of 120 m for c.6 mins at 1 3h00 as it flew over the
canopy of primary forest at c.750 m (11°49'30"N
1 2 1 °59'30"E) . The bird was distinguished from the similar
Philippine Hawk Eagle Spizaetus pinskeri (formerly 5.
philippensis: see Gamauf et al. 2005) on the basis of its
display flight (see below), which has not previously been
described (see Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). This
represents the first record on Panay, although the species
is known from all other larger Philippine islands (Kennedy
et al. 2000, Curio et al. 2001).
OBSERVATIONS
The bird soared in level flight a few metres above the
canopy and then flew powerfully upwards in steps to gain
c.30 m in height, followed by an unbroken downward
swoop with the wings almost closed. This was repeated
three times (Figs. 1-2). At the peak of its flight path the
bird quivered its fully extended wings rapidly above its
back, with their uppersides touching each other and then
spreading to an angle of up to c.40 degrees (Fig. 3), and
this was done five, six, and eight times at the three peaks.
This quivering action was apparently powerful enough to
arrest the bird in mid-air. After three cycles of ascent and
descent, the bird resumed its level flight close above the
canopy and disappeared from view.
This flight pattern recalls that of European Honey-
buzzard P. apivorus (see Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001),
yet differs characteristically from it. This latter species
displays the wing-quiver at the end of each upward swoop
and at the summit of its trajectory. It plunges down with
partly closed wings interspersed with upward swoops
ending with wing-quivering, or alternatively descends with
spread wings in one go. Hence it shows many more episodes
of wing-quivering than in the display by Steere’s Honey-
buzzard we observed. However, female and first-year male
European Honey-buzzards may perform more subdued
versions of the display than adult males, and there is
individual variation too (Ferguson-Lees and Christie
2001), so the display of Steere’s Honey-buzzard that we
observed may also have been a low-intensity version.
164
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Figure 1. Diagram showing pattern of three undulations during the display flight of Steere’s Honey-buzzard.
Figure 2. Diagram showing detailed pattern of one undulation during the display flight of Steere’s Honey-buzzard. Note the distinct upward
swoops at the summit of which the bird quivered its fully extended wings.
Figure 3. Diagram showing the wing-quivering as seen from the front
during the display flight of Steere’s Honey-buzzard.
Wing-quivering during the display flight is typical only
of the genus Pemis among the Accipitriformes (Ferguson-
Lees and Christie 2001), and thus distinguishes the bird
we observed from the similar-looking Philippine Hawk
Eagle that has recently shown to occur on Panay as well
(Curio et al. 2001).
The breeding season of Steere’s Honey-buzzard on
Panay is not known, but breeding in February has been
noted on other Philippine islands (Kennedy et al. 2000),
and Oriental Honey-buzzard P. ptilorhyncus has been found
to have enlarged gonads in April in the Philippines
(Kennedy etal. 2000) . The date of the present observation
therefore seems compatible with the possibility that the
described display flight serves some nuptial or territorial
function as it does in European Honey-buzzard.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This note is publication number 62 of the Philippine Endemic Species
Conservation Project (PESCP) operating under the aegis of a
Memorandum of Agreement with the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources of the Republic of the Philippines; the support
of the director, M. Lim, of the Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau is
gratefully acknowledged as is the cooperation of Aklan State University
and its president, B. A. Palma. The PESCP’s field research is funded
by the Frankfurt Zoological Society and other sponsors (National
Geographic Society Conservation Trust, Bird Protection Committee,
Brehm Fonds for International Bird Protection, German Breeders’
Association AZ, Haribon Foundation, North of England Zoological
Society, R. N. Bacsal, A. M. de Dios). We thank Daniel Schmidt and
Jerome Villanueva for their companionship on Mt Banderahan. We are
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
165
deeply grateful to Anita Gamauf who provided vital information on the
species mentioned, and to Friedhelm Weick (Bruchsal-Untergrombach)
who so superbly brought to life our field sketches.
REFERENCES
Curio, E., Hornbuckle, J., de Soye, Y., Aston, P. and Lastimoza, L. L.
(2001) New bird records for the island of Panay, Philippines,
including the first record of the Asian Stubtail LJrosphena squameiceps
for the Philippines. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 121: 183-197.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
G. Gewers, do Gezuers, Kuhn & Kuhn, 10623 Berlin, Hardenbergstr. 28 , Germany. Email: georg.gewers@gewers-kuehn-
kuehn.de
E. Curio, Conservation Biology Unit, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Ff 102148, 44780 Bochum, Germany, and Philippine
Endemic Species Conservation Project, P.O. Box 42, Kalibo, Aklan 5600, Philippines. Email: Eberhard.curio@mb.de;
Ecurio@gmx. de
S. H. Hembra, Philippine Endemic Species Conservation Project, P. O. Box 42, Kalibo, Aklan 5600, Philippines. Email:
aiki_ssh@backp acker, com; aiki_ssh@yahoo. com
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2005) Raptors of the world: a field
guide. London: Christopher Helm.
Gamauf, A. and Haring, E. (2004) Molecular phylogeny and
biogeography of Honey-buzzards (genera Pemis and Henicopemis ) .
J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 42: 145-153.
Gamauf, A., Gjershaug, J. O., Rov, N., Kvaloy, K. and Haring, E.
(2005) Species or subspecies? The dilemma of taxonomic ranking
of some South-East Asian hawk-eagles (genus Spizaetus). Bird
Consent. Intemat. 15: 99-117.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P.C., Dickinson, E.C., Miranda, Jr., H. C.
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Observations of Wetar Ground Dove
Gallicolumba hoedtii from Timor-Leste (East Timor)
FRANK R. LAMBERT, COLIN R. TRAINOR and ALMEIDA F. XAVIER
The genus Gallicolumba contains 20 species of largely
terrestrial pigeons that are distributed through the western
Pacific (Gibbs et al. 2001). Most of these are very poorly
known owing to their retiring, elusive nature. Wetar
Ground Dove Gallicolumba hoedtii is no exception and
has long been considered as one of the most enigmatic of
the 7 5 birds currently recognised as endemic to the Lesser
Sunda islands of Indonesia (Coates and Bishop 1997,
Dickinson et al. 2001, Olsen et al. 2002, Gershaug et al.
2004), where it is known only from Timor and Wetar. It
is one of 24 bird species that are entirely restricted to the
‘Timor and Wetar Endemic Bird Area’ (Stattersfield etal.
1998, Dickinson etal. 2001). Paucity of data from the 1 7
specimens collected more than 100 years ago from
unspecified localities on Wetar and one from west Timor
(at Camplong or ‘Tjamplong’ in 1932: Mayr 1944), and
from another three more recent (1972, 1993, 1999) brief
and poorly substantiated sightings from Timor (Fig. 1)
mean that its status, habitat requirements and ecology
have only been speculated upon (e.g. Coates and Bishop
1997). A summary of all that was known of the species up
until 2001 was provided by BirdLife International (2001),
who considered the species to be Endangered.
In September 2004, the Ministry of Environment and
Development of Timor-Leste (East Timor) confiscated a
male Wetar Ground Dove from a bird trapper
apprehended in Dili. The trapper apparently fled with the
other birds, except one Slaty Cuckoo Dove Turacoena
modesta, but which evidently included four more Wetar
Ground Doves and one Slaty Cuckoo Dove. CT was able
to confirm the identification of the male Wetar Ground
Dove retained by the Ministry of Environment and
Plate 1. Male Wetar Ground Dove retained by the Ministry of
Environment and Development and photographed before it was released
locally, 7 September 2004 (photograph: C. Trainor).
Development, and photographed it before it was released
locally (Plate 1). The bird trapper had claimed to have
caught the birds on the south coast of Timor-Leste, in the
Natarbora region (Manututo district). Based on the
assumption that the bird had indeed come from
somewhere in the south of the country, we decided to
conduct a brief search for the species along the south
coast of Timor-Leste, where little previous bird survey
work had been undertaken.
166
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Figure 1. Map of Timor showing locations mentioned in the text: (1) Camplong; (2) Gunung Timau; (3) Soe [Buat]; (4) Foho Lulik; (5)
Natarbora; (6) Lore; (7) Fuiloro Plateau [Malahara] .
STUDY SITES AND METHODS
We searched for Wetar Ground Dove in three areas: (1)
the vicinity ofFoho Lulik village (9°24'44"S 125°07'21"E,
5 m; Tilomar sub-district) , which lies along the main road
that runs from Indonesia to Suai, some 5 km from the
border. Satellite images from 2000 showed what appeared
to be a significant area of tall, little-disturbed evergreen or
semi-evergreen forest in this area: the habitat that we
assumed that Wetar Ground Dove probably preferred. It
was also an area that has never been visited by
ornithologists in recent times, if at all. Recent surveys
undertaken by CT and BirdLife International (Mauro
2003, T rainor etal. 2004) had all concentrated on forested
areas to the east of Ainaro district. We undertook surveys
at this site during 1-6 May 2005. (2) Lore (8°40'06"S
126°57'56"E, 3-70 m), c.220 km to the east of Foho
Lulik, was visited during 9-12 May 2005. It comprised a
mosaic of tall coastal evergreen forest patches and
cultivated gardens on the south coast, where spring-fed
streams ran though some of the forest. (3) Malahara
(8°28'33"S 127°10'42"E, 330-430 m), on the Fuiloro
Plateau, near Lake Iralalaro was’ visited during 14-15
May 2005. The habitat here comprised logged secondary
forest (330 m) with recent cultivated clearings, and
adjacent tall primary evergreen forest at 330-430 m on
rugged karst slopes (c.240 km east ofFoho Lulik). The
primary forest had minimal structure with limited
development of understorey trees or shrubs and with few
lianas and epiphytes.
At Foho Lulik, the vegetation structure and floristics
was examined in five 0.1-ha plots (within a 20 m radius
of a central point every 1 00 m along a 500 m transect) to
compare the two dominant vegetation types (gallery
tropical evergreen forest, and tropical dry deciduous forest
on a limestone plateau). The diameter at breast height
(DBH) of each tree greater than 10 cm diameter was
measured, its height estimated and local names transcribed
(in Timor-Leste Bunak and Fataluku languages, where
possible) . A plant collection was taken and will be identified
at the Northern Territory Herbarium (Australia), but this
information is not yet available (local names are given in
Table 1).
RESULTS
At Foho Lulik, local guides recognised several pigeon
species depicted by Coates and Bishop (1997) that
occurred in the area, but not Wetar Ground Dove, even
when shown photographs of the captive male photographed
by CT. Nevertheless we carried out searches for the species
by quietly proceeding along forested tracks whilst focusing
on terrestrial birds, and listening for unknown calls that
could be made by Gallicolumba doves. Such a call was
heard on the first evening, but not pursued because of lack
of time. However, on 2 May 2005, FL returned to the
area, heard the call again, and obtained a tape recording.
The bird was calling from a concealed perch high in the
canopy along a belt of remnant forest along a stream, but
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
167
could not be located. Using playback, however, FL lured
the bird onto a more open branch where its identity as a
male Wetar Ground Dove was clear. The bird (Male A)
stayed in this area (9°24'25"S 125°06'57"E, 20 m) for
more than a minute before flying off. Later that morning,
CT and AX were also able to view this individual, since
it was still calling again in the same area.
Two other birds were observed well enough to confirm
their identification: (1) a female on 3 May seen in the
subcanopy, c.18 m off the ground, and close to where
Male A had been calling; and (2) an unsexed bird that was
seen on 3 May flying off from a perch where it had been
calling on a dry slope about 1 00-120 m from the male. It
had been calling from c.12 m above the ground in the
dense canopy of a c.14 m-high tree, the tallest in the
vicinity, and rising above the surrounding degraded
vegetation.
Wetar Ground Doves have a distinctive appearance
and were readily identified with reference to pictures in
Coates and Bishop (1997), and CRT’s photographs of
the male. The male had: a light grey head; buff neck, chest
and belly (shown as cream in Coates and Bishop 1997);
and rich rufous wings and tail. The iridescent purple
shoulder-patch was more dispersed and less contrasting
than shown in Coates and Bishop (1997). The female
had a rich rufous cap, light throat and was more uniform
chestnut in colour than the male. The only possible
confusion species is the similar-sized and -shaped Emerald
Dove Chalcophaps indica, but this species has green wings
and light brown head and underparts.
Knowing the call, we were able to listen for other Wetar
Ground Doves in this area, and to use tape playback to try
to stimulate calling in areas where we did not hear calls.
Owing to security considerations, we were unable to
undertake extensive surveys in the area, but CT was able
to briefly survey the forest remnants along the steam for a
distance of about 700 m. In total, at least four, and perhaps
five Wetar Ground Doves were heard calling along this
part of the stream (within about 1 00 m of the stream itself) .
On three different mornings (before 1 OhOO), for a total
period of about 10 hours, we also surveyed along c. 2 km of
the forested part of the well-used trail to Tilomar. The
forest along the trail is tall and relatively untouched
deciduous forest, and lies on the limestone plateau (at
c. 70-230 m) immediately to the north-east of the valley in
which Wetar Ground Dove was found. The taller trees in
this area of forest reached heights of at least 30 m, and there
was no evidence of recent cutting of taller trees for timber.
Whilst other species of pigeon (Pink-headed Imperial
Pigeon Ducula rosacea, Slaty Cuckoo Dove, Barred-necked
Cuckoo Dove Macropygia magna, Rose-crowned Fruit Dove
Ptilinopus regina and Black-backed Fruit Dove P. emails')
were calling in this area of forest, we did not hear Wetar
Ground Dove during our early morning surveys.
Our brief searches, using the same methods (including
playing of the call) in forested areas at Lore and near Lake
Iralalaro were not successful. No calls of the species were
heard in either area, and a few local people who were
questioned about Wetar Ground Dove did not recognise
it when shown photographs, although they recognised
pictures of other pigeons present in the area.
Behaviour
Wetar Ground Dove is evidently an inconspicuous species.
Local people whom we talked to did not know the species,
with the possible exception of one hunter; in addition, we
only saw birds when they were calling.
Most of our observations relate to Male A. This bird
consistently called from the same area, in the canopy at
1 8-22 m in trees c.25 m tall. Typically it appeared to call
from within or just below dense parts of the canopy,
particularly in places where the leaves of vines made the
canopy more dense than usual. On three occasions it was
seen calling: twice it was on a more-or-less horizontal
branch about 6-8 cm in diameter. On the third occasion
it called only once, from a branch in a fairly open tree (see
below). When calling, it lowered its head momentarily at
the beginning of the call, and appeared to puff up its
chest.
Three different calls were given. The most typical call
was a short and soft two-note whu-wup or dn-wup given at
2.0-2. 5 sec intervals (Fig. 2a). It was occasionally preceded
by another syllable: du du-wup (Fig. 2b), or followed by
a brief guttural trrr. This suffix was often not as audible
as the other two notes from further away; we were unable
to produce a sonagram showing it. After tape playback of
any of the calls, the male always responded with this three-
note call. Occasionally, birds would start giving this call,
but then change to the slightly quieter two-note version.
The du-zvup trrr call, at least, may be territorial, since on
a number of occasions initiation of this call by one bird
resulted in an immediate response of the same call by one
or two neighbours. Only Male A was seen calling, so it was
never ascertained whether or not females call.
We obtained no evidence for terrestrial habits by the
species, since all of our observations were of birds calling
from the canopy. Even when seen in flight, which
happened on at least ten occasions, Male A was usually
high above the ground. In contrast, Emerald Doves were
regularly seen flying through the area c.3-5 m off the
ground. Most observations of Wetar Ground Doves in
flight were of birds at about 10-18 m above the ground.
The lowest sighting was c.6-7 m off the ground, when
a.
kHz
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
J
;
J
b
kHz
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
1
~1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 -
2345678s
J
i J
ij
~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 U s
Figure 2. Sonagrams of calls of Wetar Ground Dove from recordings
made in May 2005 near Foho Lulik, Timor-Leste (sonograms prepared
by British Library Sound Archive, where the recordings are archived) .
168
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Male A landed briefly close to FL at 08h20 on 5 May
2005. On this occasion, it had a short piece of dried vine
twig (identified by the presence of a section of curled
tendrils) in its bill, which it subsequently took to a high
location (c.23 m) in the canopy, directly above the stream:
evidently a nest site.
After this, Male A called a few times from nearby, and
then dropped onto a fairly obvious perch in the canopy of
a Peltophorum pterocarpum (Fabaceae), a tree species in
which it was seen perching on several occasions. There,
it gave the three-note call after a few minutes, and then sat
still until 09h 1 3 . At 09h 1 4, having moved within the same
tree, it gave a single three-note call, and this was
immediately answered by two three-note calls from what
was judged to be its nearest neighbour, some 100-120 m
away on the slope above the valley. This bird had been
calling intermittently during the morning, from at least
07h00, as had another bird further up the stream. It seems
likely that other birds may have been calling within hearing
distance of the bird, further up the valley: we could hear
the calls of Wetar Ground Dove, at ground level, from a
distance of at least 200 m.
At 9hl7, Male A moved out of view and gave a few
calls, being answered by its two nearest neighbours, which
both gave three-note calls. One bird then gave a two-note
call. From 09h30 to 09h40, Male A was calling again near
the nest site, with about 30 seconds between each call,
whilst its nearest neighbour answered occasionally. At
09h44 it visited the vicinity of the nest (though whether
with nest material was not ascertained) , and stayed hidden
in that area until 09h57, when it moved to an exposed
branch in the adjacent subcanopy before flying off
downstream at 09h58. Two-minutes later it was back in
more-or-less the same subcanopy location, where it gave
two three-note calls before flying in a low downward arc,
downstream, whilst giving three wing-claps.
At 1 Oh 1 0 am, Male A returned again to the subcanopy
near its nest site holding in its bill a thin, forked twig c.5
cm long. It took the twig to the same area of the canopy
as at 08h20. At 1 0h23, Male A was calling from a hidden
location near its nest, with gaps of 3-5 seconds between
calls. Its whereabouts then became uncertain until 10h48,
when it gave one call from nearby, and then again at
1 1 h 1 2, when it started calling more regularly. At 1 1 h 1 6,
it made five wing-claps (loud claps audible for c. 50 m, but
we did not note whether this noise was made during contact
of the wings from above or below) near the nest and then
disappeared. FL left the area at this time, but returned at
about 16h00. No calls were heard near the nest site,
however, until about 17h20, when a bird started calling
very regularly from a perch nearby at a rate of 1 9-2 1 two-
note calls per minute. This is assumed to have been Male
A, based on location, but not verified. Calling finished at
about 1 7h40, just as the sun set. During this period, calling
had been regular from the territory of its nearest neighbour,
which started calling earlier and finished slightly later. On
4 May 2005, calling from Male A’s territory started earlier
in the afternoon, at about 16h25. ’
Male A’s nest was never observed directly, but its
location was determined to within 1-2 m. It was in the
upper canopy of ajoil tree (O. Berek verbally 2006) where
the leaves of a liana ( Entada phaseoloides; Fabaceae) made
the canopy particularly dense.
Wing-clapping consisting 3-5 clearly audible claps
attributed to Male A was heard on four occasions, although
Table 1. Floristic and structural characteristics of gallery rainforest
(where Wetar Ground Dove was recorded) and tropical dry forest
(where it was not recorded) at Foho Lulik, Timor-Leste. Local tree
names are indicated in parentheses. Significance of Mann- Whitney La¬
test: **p<0.01, * p<0.05, ns= not significant.
it was only observed once. On this occasion, it clapped its
wings as it flew in a shallow downward arc along the line
of the stream, clapping the wings directly below the nest
location.
Habitat description
During our brief survey in the vicinity of Foho Lulik, we
only encountered Wetar Ground Dove in the remnant
forest trees bordering a 3-4 m wide, clear, meandering,
spring-fed stream, and from a location c.100 m distant
from the stream on the drier slope above the alluvial plain.
The vegetation in this area was a mosaic of different
habitats, including tall grass in large clearings, but remnant
tall trees and narrow strips of gallery evergreen forest
patches (with a canopy height of 25-35 m) bordered the
stream along most of its length. We did not encounter the
species in nearby drier tropical dry deciduous forest on
limestone. There were substantial differences between
the two habitats: gallery evergreen rainforest had
significantly greater basal area (44% more than tropical
dry forest), more stems (39%) and more tree species per
plot (31%) (see Table 1). A total of 252 individual trees
of 52 species were recorded in the ten plots, with substantial
differences in tree species composition between the two
habitats. Eleven tree species composed more than half of
the recorded stems. There was little difference in mean
tree height between the two habitats, but overall the canopy
of gallery rainforest averaged 30 m and that of tropical dry
forest averaged 23 m.
DISCUSSION
Almost nothing is known about any aspect of the habitat
requirements of Wetar Ground Dove. This is partly
because no locality or other data are available for the
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
169
original 1 9 specimens from Wetar (BirdLife International
2001). All that is known about the Timor specimen
collected by Georg Stein in January 1932 comes from
Mayr ( 1 944), who had to construct Stein’s itinerary from
the meagre data on the labels. Stein was evidently collecting
at Camplong (c.35 km east of Kupang, West Timor) at
the time he obtained the immature male Wetar Ground
Dove, although this does not necessarily mean that the
specimen came from there, since he could have
purchased it from bird trappers or hunters. However,
assuming that the specimen was from Camplong, it is
interesting to note that this area shares some habitat
characteristics ofourFohoLulik site. Ate. 1 60 m altitude,
Camplong has areas of spring-fed streams lined by tall
evergreen trees, surrounded by tall tropical deciduous
forest dominated by Tamarindus indica (CT personal
observations).
More recent claimed sightings, which are very poorly
documented and difficult to verify, are all from significantly
higher altitudes. The first was of a bird seen near Same,
Timor-Leste, by M. Bruce in August 1972, though the
record lacks any details (White and Bruce 1986). Same
town is at about 500 m and is one of the wettest recorded
regions on Timor, with rainfall of 3, 1 00 mm/yr (RePPProT
1989) and many springs and perennial streams (CT
personal observations). In July 1993, R. Noske flushed
what he considered to be a Wetar Ground Dove from the
ground c.5 km from Soe (Buat forest) in the mountains
of West Timor at 950 m (Noske and Saleh 1996, BirdLife
International 2001). D. Lesmana reported seeing the
species four times at 600 m and once at 900 m at Kolabe
on Mt Timau (c. 60 km north-east of Kupang, West Timor)
in May 1999 (Lesmana et al. 2000). Despite the
significance of the records, Lesmana failed to note the
sex of the individuals seen, and the only recorded
information relating to these sightings is contained in an
Indonesian-language report (Lesmana et al. 2000). In
this, Lesmana stated that five birds were observed in heavily
degraded forest (with ‘plants the height of a house’) where
they were eating the seeds of damar merah in the trees and
on the ground. The trees were also being used by Slaty
Cuckoo Dove. He identified damar merah as Macaranga
sp. Although not specified clearly in the report of Lesmana
et al. (2000), BirdLife International (2001) noted that
Lesmana’s 900 m sighting was in moist semi-deciduous
forest (citing ‘Lesmana verbally’). Interestingly, the map
of vegetation cover for West Timor shown in Lesmana et
al. (2000), which is based on WCMC (1996), appears to
indicate that the only semi-evergreen forest remaining in
western West Timor occurs on Mt Timau. Apart from
the different elevation, this tropical forest type, with a
high proportion of evergreen trees growing to 25-35 m in
height, is similar to Foho Lulik in terms of forest structure
and degree of deciduousness.
The persistent calling of Wetar Ground Dove from at
least two spots at Foho Lulik throughout our stay, and the
collection of nest material by one male, clearly indicate
breeding. Our observations suggest that the onset of
breeding may be tied to the beginning of the dry season,
but without further field data it is not possible to say more
about breeding seasonality. It also seems possible that
breeding is associated with permanent water derived from
springs. If Wetar Ground Dove is a dry-season breeder,
then this may be unusual on Timor, since Noske (2003)
presented evidence to suggest that egg-laying by land
birds occurs throughout the wet season (November-
April), possibly peaking in November. Nevertheless,
during our brief visit to Foho Lulik, we noted breeding
behaviour by several other species in the vicinity: Slaty
Cuckoo Dove was seen displaying; Tawny Grassbird
Megalurus timorensis and munias Lonchura sp. were seen
collecting nest material; and a Spotted Dove Streptopelia
chinensis was observed sitting on a nest.
Our brief surveys suggest that Wetar Ground Dove
could be a locally common breeding species in certain
riparian forests where there are spring-fed streams, such
as at Foho Lulik. However, our failure to find the species
at the two other sites with similar habitats suggests that
its habitat requirements may be highly specialised.
One notable difference between the sites visited was that
the mosaic of habitats along the stream floodplain
and adjacent rocky (limestone) slopes at Foho Lulik
contained significant areas that were dominated by
bamboo. Perhaps, therefore, this is a key component of
the habitat for the species. One other restricted-range
species in Timor-Leste — Tricoloured Parrot-finch
Erythrura tricolor — seems often to be associated with
bamboo, while some populations ofWhite-bibbed Ground
Dove Gallicolumba jobiensis of New Guinea and some of
its satellite islands are reported to be nomadic and to
move into areas of seeding bamboo (Gibbs et al. 2001).
All other restricted-range forest species on Timor can be
found in a variety of forest habitats, including dry forest
(Noske and Saleh 1 996, Stattersfield et al. 1 998, Trainor
et al. 2004).
While few species of Gallicolumba are well known, there
can be little doubt that the majority are highly terrestrial.
With the exception of White-throated Ground Dove
G. xanthonura of the Mariana Islands and Yap, all
other Gallicolumba species are believed to be primarily
terrestrial, although the Mindoro Bleeding-heart
G. platenae was once reported feeding on figs with
Treron sp. pigeons (Collar et al. 1999, Gibbs et al. 2001).
Furthermore, of nine of the 20 species for which the nest
is known in the wild, all apparently nest close to or on
the ground (Gibbs et al. 2001, Slade et al. 2005). In these
respects, Wetar Ground Dove may be unusual, since
our observations suggest that they spend a considerable
time high in the canopy (males, during the breeding
season, at least), and furthermore construct their nests
there.
The fact that only one Wetar Ground Dove specimen
has been collected on Timor island from a total of more
than 2,000 bird specimens suggests that the Wetar Ground
Dove has always been quite rare (Mayr 1 944: 1 ,354 bird
specimens collected by G. Stein; Hellmayr 1914, see White
and Bruce 1986: 400 bird specimens; and J. McKean and
I. Mason in White and Bruce 1986: 281 bird specimens).
The observation that the Timor specimen was collected
at Camplong, but is clearly no longer present at the site,
is the only direct evidence of decline in this species. We
feel that it would be premature to attempt to discuss the
conservation status of Wetar Ground Dove on Timor
based on our limited observations. However, it is striking
that Wetar Ground Dove is absent from Lautem district,
which retains by far the most intact set of tropical forest
landscapes (c.500 km2) on Timor. More surveys are
needed for the species along the central south coast of
Timor-Leste (and perhaps Mt Timau in West Timor)
and on Wetar island.
170
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank Orlando Berek (Forest Guard, Suai district), Sixto
Borges, Manuel Cardosa, and Maria Berek for help in the field and
logistical support at Foho Lulik. Funding for the surveys was made
possible by the BirdLife International Asia Programme, and we would
like to thank Richard Grimmett and Cathy Molnar. Permission to
conduct fieldwork was facilitated and given by Cypriana Soares and
Estanislau da Silva of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries (MAFF, Timor-Leste). Adalfredo Ferreira of the Geographical
Information Systems unit (MAFF), provided access to aerial photos of
the Foho Lulik area which helped pinpoint study sites, and Geoffrey
Carr, Charles Darwin University (Darwin, Australia), kindly prepared
the map. Thanks are also due to the United Kingdom Parrot Society
for supporting purchase of a vehicle which was used to access
remote field sites and to Ian Cowie of the Northern T erritory Herbarium
for providing access to a working list of Timor plants. Sonagrams
were kindly prepared by Richard Ranft of the British Library Sound
Archive.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Bouma, G. A. and Kobryn, H. T. (2004) Change in vegetation cover
in East Timor, 1989-1999. Natural Resources Forum 28: 1-12.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland, Australia: Dove Publications.
Collar, N. J., Mallari, N. A. D. andTabaranza, B. R. (1999) Threatened
birds of the Philippines. Manila: Bookmark Inc. and Haribon
Foundation.
Dickinson, E. C., Rasmussen, P. C, Round, P. D. and Rozendaal, F.
G. (200 1 ) Systematic notes on Asian birds 1 . A review of the russet
bush-warbler Bradypterus seebohmi (Ogilvie-Grant, 1895) Zool.
Verb. 331: 1 1-64.
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E. and Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and doves.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Gjershaug, J. O, Kvaloy, K., Rov,N., Prawiradilaga, D. M., Suparman,
U. and Rahman, Z. (2004) The taxonomic status of the Flores
Hawk-eagle Spizaetus floris. Forktail 20: 55-61.
Hellmayr, C. E. (1914) Die Avifauna von Timor. Pp. 1-1 12 in C. B.
Haniel (ed.) Zoologie von Timor. Stuttgart: in Kommissionsverlag
der E. Schwizerbartschen Verlagsbuchhandlung, Nagele und Dr
Sproesser in Stuttgart.
Lesmana, D, Trainor, C. and Gatur, A. (2000) Arti penting hutan di
daratan Timor bagian barat: telaah awal informasi keanekaragaman
hayati dan sosial ekonomi di Pulau Timor (Propinsi Nusa Tenggara
Timur) . [‘The importance of forest areas in West Timor: a review of
biodiversity and socio-economic information based on rapid surveys’]
Bogor: PKA/BirdLife International/WWF, Report No 13. (In
Indonesian.)
Mayr, E. (1944) The birds of Timor and Sumba. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat.
Hist. 83: 127-194.
Mauro, I. (2003) New and significant ornithological records from Asia’s
newest country: Timor-Leste. Bogor: Unpublished report to BirdLife
International.
McKean, J. L., Mason, I. J. and O’Connor, L. W. (1975) Birds not
previously recorded from Timor. Emu 75: 62-64.
Noske, R. A. (2003) The breeding seasons of birds on Timor. Kukila 12:
31-43.
Noske, R. A. and Saleh, N. (1996) The conservation status of forest
birds in West Timor. Pp. 65-74 in D. Kitchener and A. Suyanto,
eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Eastern
Indonesian - Australian Vertebrate Fauna , Manado, Indonesia,
November 22-26, 1994.
Olsen, J., Wink, M., Sauer-Gurth, H. and Trost, S. (2002) Anew Ninox
from Sumba, Indonesia. Emu 102: 223-231.
RePPProT (1989) The land resources of Indonesia: a national overview.
Jakarta: ODA/Ministry of Transmigration.
Slade, M., Villanueva, J. F., Tacud, B. and Curio, E. (2005) First
nesting observations of the Negros Bleeding-heart Gallicolumba keayi
from Panay, Philippines. Forktail 21: 161-163.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
BirdLife Conservation Series No. 7. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Trainor, C. R., Santana, F., Xavier, A., dos Santos, L., Xavier, F. and
dos Santos, J. (2004). Status of globally threatened birds and
internationally significant sites in Timor-Leste (East Timor) based
on rapid participatory biodiversity assessments . Unpublished report.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. ( 1 986) The birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands Indonesia). An annotated checklist.
London: British Ornithologists’ Union (Checklist no. 7).
Frank R. Lambert, do 64 Eldred Avenue, Brighton BN1 5EG, U.K. Email: flambertemail@yahoo.co.uk
Colin R. Trainor, Tropical Savannas Management Cooperative Research Centre, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina
0909 Northern Territory 0812, Australia. Email: colin.trainor@cdu.edu.au
Almeida F. Xavier, Chief District Forest Officer (Los Palos), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Timor-Leste.
A taxonomic reappraisal of the Black-browed Barbet
Megalaima oorti
N. J. COLLAR
As commonly treated (e.g. Peters 1948, Cheng 1987,
Clements 2000, Short and Horne 200 1 , 2002, Dickinson
2003), Black-browed Barbet Megalaima oorti consists of
five widely disjunct subspecies: M. o. nuchalis on Taiwan,
M. o. sini in southern mainland China, M. o. faber on
Hainan, M. o. annamensis through parts of eastern
Indochina (Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam), and AT o. oorti in
Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra (see Fig. 1; note that
Robson [2000] also lists nominate oorti for extreme
southern Thailand). In terms of plumage morphology,
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
171
these five taxa fall into three distinct groups, (1) nuchalis
as a standalone, (2) sini and faber, and (3) annamensis and
oorti. Wolters (1975-1982), who confined Megalaima to
a single species and placed the birds considered here in
the genus Cyanops , elected to treat these groups as three
species, M. nuchalis , M. faber and M. oorti. Lewthwaite
(1996) evidently concurred with this judgement, but his
information was overlooked by Short and Horne (2002)
who, in retaining all taxa in the single species M. oorti,
noted:
Very well-marked races sini and faber could prove
specifically distinct; nuchalis also sometimes thought
possibly to be a distinct species, but tends to bridge
the gap between these two races and nominate oorti
and annamensis ; thus, all are considered better
treated as races of present species.
Lewthwaite (1996), however, had made the point that
important vocal differences supported the separation of
the taxa into three species:
When recent recordings of birds singing in Guangxi,
Guangdong, Taiwan and South Annam... were
compared with published recordings from
Malaysia..., the songs ofsw/and nuchalis were found
to differ from each other and from those of annamensis
and oorti, which in turn resembled each other.
Moreover, on the basis of a rapid assessment of museum
specimens, Collar (2004), who also overlooked
Lewthwaite (1996), pointed out that nuchalis is certainly
not geographically intermediate between the southern
Chinesefaber group and the South-East Asian oorti group
(Taiwan is a north-easterly outlier of the complex and
over 1 0° further east than the latitudinally similar sini: see
Fig. 1 ), and much less morphologically intermediate than
at first glance. While nuchalis shares a full red breast-
patch with the faber group, its forecrown coloration is
shared with the oorti group (in many ways this is the more
striking concordance, thereby leap-frogging the
geographically intermediate black-crowned Chinese
birds); but the latter two groups share a red rear mid¬
crown while nuchalis has a red upper mantle-patch, a
feature which further undermines the notion of the latter’s
intermediacy.
Measurements of taxa in Short and Horne (2001),
although helpfully broken down by sex, do not allow full
comparisons because certain features are omitted (tail,
Figure 1. Ranges of the five taxa of Black-browed Barbet Megalaima
oorti , conflated from maps in Short and Horne (2001, 2002) and adjusted
to incorporate new range data for M. o. ( =M . faber ) sini (see text).
Dashed lines indicate new species limits.
bill and tarsus for annamensis and faber, tail and tarsus for
nuchalis and sini). I therefore measured, using digital
calipers, bill, tarsus, wing and tail of all five taxa represented
by specimen material in the American Museum of Natural
History, New York (AMNH), and Natural History
Museum, Tring (BMNH), constructing a matrix of their
key plumage patterns (Table 1) and morphometries
Table 1. Plumage colour matrix for the five taxa in the Megalaima oorti complex. The asterisk (*) indicates that the text discusses slight differences
on the lower forehead.
172
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Table 3. Statistical significance of different measurements of the taxa
in Table 2.
(Tables 2 and 3). In order to assess species limits, I
deployed a quantitative system — to be published in detail
elsewhere (Collar et al. in prep., but outlined in Collar
2006) — for grading morphological and vocal differences
between allopatric taxa: a major difference scores 3,
medium difference 2, minor difference 1, a threshold of
7 is set to allow species status, and no taxon can qualify
for this status on minor differences alone, no matter how
many. (In this analysis, degree of significance in size
difference is not allowed for, and such differences, if
counted at all, are considered minor.)
From Tables 1-3 it is clear that oorti and annamensis
separate out (whether considered together or separately)
from faber, sini and nuchalis on the basis of their complete
red forehead and lores (in the other taxa the lores are
black by the eye, red by the bill, the latter making a red
spot) (score 2), turquoise (vs blue) on upper breast and
ear-coverts (2), red spot each side of the upper breast (vs
red breast-band) (2), and small, blue-boxed red nape-
patch (vs either large and black-sided or absent) (1), all¬
yellow crown (2), turquoise (vs black) subocular cheek
area (frontal ear-coverts) (1) and significantly smaller
size (bill, tarsus and wing) (1). There is the further
testimony (Lewthwaite 1996) that their songs, while
similar to each other, are different from the three more
northerly taxa (a score of 2 here may be unjustly low but
at least assumes the difference cannot be minor). A total
of 13 indicates that these two taxa are better treated on
these multiple, distinctive characters as a single species,
although annamensis is unique among all taxa under
consideration in having a yellowish-green crown and throat
(score 2) and in its longer wing and shorter tail it shows
a (weakly) significant difference from oorti ( 1), and its bill
more extensively grey-horn on the lower mandible than
all other taxa (1), all suggesting that there is considerable
distance between the two forms in the newly arranged
species M. oorti.
It is also clear that nuchalis separates out from faber
and sini on the basis of its paler, more turquoise-blue
upper breast-band and ear-coverts (1), much larger red
loral spot (1), yellowish shading to whitish crown (2),
bluish shading to green upper hind-crown (2), diffuse red
patch on upper mantle (2), and slightly smaller size
(although this is only on average, and only signficant for
wing length) (no score). In addition, a different song
(again, with the disclaimer it may be too low, 2), fide
Lewthwaite (1996, also P. I. Holt in litt. 2006) takes the
total to 1 0 and confers species status on nuchalis.
The differences between faber and sini are small. In his
original description, Stresemann (1929) diagnosed Fra as
very similar to faber ‘aber Federn des Stirnrandes mit
roten Spitzen auf blaugriinem Grunde statt mit
blaugriinen Spitze; Ohrdecken und seitlich-riickwartige
Begrenzung des gelben Kehlflecks mehr veilchenfarben,
weniger blau’ (‘but the feathers on the edges of the forehead
have red tips on a blue-green base, rather than blue-green
tips; ear-coverts and lower upperside borders to the yellow
throat [=lower malar area] more violet, less blue’). He
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
173
gave the wing of the type as 1 1 2 mm, which conforms well
with the 1 1 1 mm of the single specimen in BMNH and
suggests that a longer wing may be a further minor point
of separation from faber (score 1 ) . On the BMNH specimen
(1 934.6.20.4) the more violet coloration of the ear-coverts
and lower malar is just discernible (1), but the red tips to
feathers on the lower forehead (area immediately above
the bill) are absent (indeed, the dull blue-green feathers
on the lower forehead of the five BMNH/a6er are very few
and barely noticeable) (0); however, it has a more complete
blue lower border to the red hindcrown-patch than appears
on any of the five BMNH /afer (0, since it is not known
if this feature is constant in other specimens of sini). A
score of only 2 therefore separates the two taxa.
Most of the plumage differences used here to establish
species limits are evident in the photographs published in
Collar (2004). Vocal differences merit further analysis
when recordings of all five taxa become available —
Lewthwaite (1996) was lacking faber — and more detailed
analysis of these and other characters may perhaps suggest
that annamensis has a claim to species rank. Meanwhile I
commend the species-level treatment proposed by Wolters
(1975-1982). Possible English names for the resulting
species might be Taiwan Barbet for Megalaima nuchalis
and Chinese Barbet (or possibly Black-crowned Barbet)
for M. faber, with Black-browed Barbet restricted to M.
oorti, yielding the following arrangement:
Megalaima nuchalis TAIWAN BARBET (Gould, 1863)
Taiwan
Megalaima faber CHINESE BARBET
M. f. sini (Stresemann, 1929) S China
M. f. faber (Swinhoe, 1870) Hainan
Megalaima oorti BLACK-BROWED BARBET
M. o. annamensis (Robinson and Kloss, 1919)
Indochina
M. o. oorti (S. Muller, 1835) W Malaysia, Sumatra
Fortunately, all three species are relatively common and
widespread. Megalaima nuchalis is ‘common. . . in all types
of forest from sea level to 2,800 m’ on Taiwan
(Severinghaus and Blackshaw 1976; also Short and Horne
2001). Megalaima faber sini was recently speculated to be
at risk when it was believed confined to the Yao Shan
range in China (Short and Horne 2002), but this
overlooked the comment in MacKinnon and Phillipps
(2000) of its being a ‘common resident in Guanxi
(Yaoshan)’ and, more importantly, the information in
Lewthwaite (1996) which extended its range 250 km
south-east and 400 km east. Indeed, R. W. Lewthwaite
(in litt. 2006) notes that sini is now known from ‘all parts
of Guangxi except the coast, southern Hunan, western,
northern and central Guangdong, southern Jiangxi, with
a recent record from south-east Guizhou’, although he
adds the caveat that it is ‘restricted to areas of mature
native forest and is an indicator of forest quality’.
Megalaima f. faber, although described as rare on Hainan
(Cheng 1987, Short and Horne 200 1 , 2002), proves from
recent observations to be common and widespread (Lok
etal. 2005) . Megalaima oorti annamensis is ‘fairly common
to common’ (Robson 2000), while AL o. oorti is ‘common
and locally abundant’ in Sumatra (van Marie and Voous
1988; also Short and Home 2002), and ‘common wherever
found’ (typically in forest at 750-1,300 m) in Peninsular
Malaysia (Wells 1999). Thus it would appear that all
three qualify as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am very grateful to the staff at AMNH (Paul Sweet, Shannon Kenney,
Peter Capainolo) and BMNH (Robert Prys-Jones, Mark Adams,
Katrina Cook) for access to the specimens used in the morphometric
analysis, to Ana S. L. Rodrigues and Claire N. Spottiswoode for advice
on statistical analysis and preparation of the tables and map, to Yves
de Soye, Mike Kilburn, Craig Robson and Paul Holt for various
kindnesses, and to two referees — Richard Lewthwaite and Martin
Williams — for sensible suggestions and additional data.
REFERENCES
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
Clements, J. F. (2000) Birds of the world: a checklist. Fifth edition.
Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Collar, N. J. (2004) Subspecies of Taiwan birds — first impressions.
BirdingASIA 2: 34-52.
Collar, N. J. (2006) A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae) .
Forktail 22: 85-112.
Collar, N. J., Fishpool, L. D. C., Pilgrim, J. D., Seddon, N. and
Spottiswoode, C. N. (in prep.) The assessment of avian species
rank, 2: quantification of character significance.
Dickinson, E. C. ed. (2003) The Howard & Moore complete checklist of
the birds of the world. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Lewthwaite, R. W. (1996) Forest birds of southeast China: observations
during 1984-1996. Hong Kong Bird Report 1995: 150-203.
Lok, C. B. P., Shing, L. K., Zhang, J.-F. and Su, W.-B. (2005) Notable
bird records from Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Hainan
Island, China. Forktail 21: 33-41.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
van Marie, J. G. and Voous, K. H. (1988) The birds of Sumatra. Tring,
U.K.: British Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list 10).
Peters, J. L. (1948) Check-list of birds of the world, 6. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Severinghaus, S. R. and Blackshaw, K. T. (1976) A new guide to the
birds of Taiwan. Taipei: Mei Ya.
Short, L. L. and Horne, J. F. M. (2001) Toucans, barbets and honey guides.
Oxford: Oxford University Press (Bird Families of the World, 8).
Short, L. L. and Horne, J. F. M. (2002) Family Capitonidae (barbets) .
Pp. 140-219 in J. del Hoyo, A. D. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds.
Handbook of birds of the world. Vol. 7. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx
Edicions.
Stresemann, E. (1929) Eine Vogelsammlung aus Kwangsi.J. Om. 77:
323-337.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Vol. 1.
London: Academic Press.
Wolters, H. E. (1975-1982) Die Vogelarte der Erde: eine systematische
Liste mit Verbreitungsangaben sowie deutschen und englischen Namen.
Hamburg and Berlin: Paul Parey.
N.J. Collar, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U.K. Email: nigel.collar@birdlife.org
174
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 22 (2006)
Black-necked Stork Ephippiovhynchus asiaticus and
Sarus Crane Grus antigone depredating eggs of the
three-striped roofed turtle Kachuga dhongoka
RAJEEV CHAUHAN and HARRY ANDREWS
Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus are obligate
carnivores, with their diet including waterbirds, fish and
reptiles, including, occasionally, marine turtle hatchlings
(Whiting and Guinea 1999, Sundar and Kaur 2001,
Maheswaran and Rahmani 2002). Sarus Cranes Grus
antigone are omnivorous, with their diet known to include
cereals, potatoes, tubers, insects, frogs, snakes and eggs
of birds (see Sundar and Choudhury 2003) . Both species
are sympatric and seldom seen in rivers, preferring shallow,
freshwater inland wetlands (BirdLife International 200 1 ,
Sundar and Choudhury 2003, Sundar 2004).
Observations of both species from riverine areas are few,
and little is known of their habits when they occur in such
habitats. Here we describe observations of the two species
eating riverine turtle eggs, previously unknown in the diet
of either species.
OBSERVATIONS
During a field visit to the National Chambal Sanctuary in
Etawah district, Uttar Pradesh, India, under the aegis of
the turtle egg protection programme of the Madras
Crocodile BankTrust on 27 February 2006, we observed
an adult Black-necked Stork and a pair of Sarus Cranes
near Ghadaita village (26°46.3TN 78°49.1 l'E) feeding
on turtle eggs. The birds were observed for 40 minutes at
03h45 digging in the sand with their beaks to expose the
turtle eggs. The stork swallowed the eggs whole while the
cranes pierced the exposed eggs with their beaks, and
swallowed the material inside before discarding the
eggshells. Thirteen nests of the three-striped roofed turtle
Kachuga dhongoka were depredated during the
observation. Very few eggs remained undamaged in four
nests, and the birds ate all the eggs in the other nests. The
13 nests were all dug by female turtles during the
observation period and were then immediately depredated
by the birds, which appeared to locate the nests by watching
turtles walk back to the water after laying eggs.
On a second visit to the river on 9 March 2006, at
Baswara village c.5 km from Ghadaita village, another
Sarus Crane pair (presumed to be different owing to the
distance; K. S. G. Sundar in litt. 2006) was seen depredating
nest of the three-striped roofed turtle. During 1 2h 1 5—
1 2h45, the birds depredated five nests. As no turtles were
seen laying, the birds presumably located the nest pits by
probing the sand with their beak, perhaps using as a cue
the different colour of the sand above freshly dug nests.
DISCUSSION
We have been visiting this region and other stretches of
the Chambal River to study turtle breeding biology since
1 992, and have not seen this behaviour by either species
before. Additionally, it has not been noted by others who
have worked in the Chambal region for many years (D.
Basu and S. K. Sharma in litt. 2006). Furthermore, there
are apparently no records of any species of stork or crane
depredating freshwater turtle eggs (K. S. G. Sundar in
litt. 2006), although Black-necked Storks in Australia have
been observed to feed on freshly hatched marine turtles
at night (Whiting and Guinea 1999). Nevertheless, local
people at several locations along the Chambal River
appeared to be familiar with turtle nest depredation by
Black-necked Storks at least. Given that turtle eggs and
hatchlings are a rich source of nutrition concentrated in
relatively large quantities during a time when other foods
may be in limited supply, it is surprising that this behaviour
is not more widespread and/or better known.
The sand islands in the river here are used for nesting
by several species of turtles during February-April, when
food resources for Sarus Cranes are scarce, but when
Black-necked Storks can readily find fish. The three-
striped roofed turtle frequently lays eggs in the daytime,
rendering it vulnerable to depredation by diurnal
predators. The birds may have learned this behaviour by
eating eggs left in nests that had been depredated by
monitor lizards or mammals.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Madras Crocodile Bank T rust funded the visits through the turtle
egg protection programme and the Forest Department, Uttar Pradesh,
for permits and facilities. We are grateful for the company of D. Basu,
Jai Kishen, R. S. Pal, Shailendra Singh and Ashutosh Tripathi during
the observations. We also thank K. S. Gopi Sundar for suggesting that
this note be written and helping with previous drafts, and the Indian
Cranes and Wetlands Working Group for support with background
literature.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Maheswaran, G. and Rahmani, A. R. (2002) Foraging behaviour and
feeding success of the black-necked stork ( Ephippiorhychus asiaticus )
in Dudwa National Park, Uttar Pradesh, India. J. Zool. 258:1 89-
195.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2004) Group size and habitat use by Black-necked
Storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in an agriculture dominated
landscape in Uttar Pradesh, India. BirdConserv. Intemat. 14: 323-
334.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2003) The Indian Sarus
Crane Grus a. antigone : a literature review. J. Ecol. Soc. 16: 16-41.
Forktail 22 (2006)
SHORT NOTES
175
Sundar, K. S. G. and Kaur, J. (2001) Distribution and nesting sites of Whiting, S. D. and Guinea, M. L. (1999) Nocturnal foraging by the
the Blacknecked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus. J. Bombay Nat. Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus on sea turtle
Hist. Soc. 98: 276-278. hatchlings. Emu 99: 145-147.
Rajeev Chauhan, Society for Conservation of Nature, 576 Karamganj, Punjabi Colony, Etawah 206 001, Uttar Pradesh,
India. Email: Raj_scon@yahoo.com
Harry Andrews, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust, Post Bag 4, Mamallapuram 603104, Tamil Nadu, India. Email:
mcbtindia@vsnl. net
Forktail 22
2006
Guidelines for contributors
Forktail publishes original papers in the English language (also,
in certain cases, English translations of papers in Oriental
languages) treating any aspect of the ornithology (e.g. distribution,
biology, conservation, identification) of the region bounded by
the Indus River to the west, the Russian Far East, Korean
Peninsula, Japan, and Lydekker’s Line (i.e. the eastern boundary
of Wallacea) to the east, the Chagos Archipelago, Lesser Sundas,
Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands to the south (see
map in Oriental Bird Club Bull. 31 :7). Submissions are considered
on the understanding that they are being offered solely for
publication by the Oriental Bird Club, which will retain copyright.
All submissions are reviewed by referees and the Forktail Editorial
Committee, and those accepted are normally published in order
of receipt. (Some further indication of the type of material
appropriate for the journal is provided in the inaugural editorial,
‘The scope of Forktail’, Forktail 1: 3-5.)
Submissions should be sent electronically as an email
attachment to mail@orientalbirdclub.org. If this is not possible,
manuscripts may be sent on disk, preferably in PC format, to the
Senior Editor, Forktail, OBC, P.O. Box 324, Bedford, MK42
OWG, U.K. In both cases, the text, tables, figure legends and
appendices should be combined as a single Word file. Figures
(maps, diagrams, images etc.) should be sent as highresolution
scans in standard file formats (JPEG, TIFF etc.) or, if this is not
possible, originals may be posted to the above address. Maps
should be marked with a scale and north arrow. The approximate
position of figures and tables should be indicated in the margin of
the typescript. Papers should be concise and factual, take full
account of previous relevant literature but avoid repetition of
established information as much as possible; opinions expressed
should be based on adequate evidence. Titles of papers must be
accurate and concise, and (for the benefit of abstraction services)
include any relevant scientific (taxonomic) name.
Whenever possible, authors should consult an issue of Forktail
for style and layout. Spelling follows The shorter Oxford English
dictionary, except that external features of birds are spelt and
hyphenated in accordance with the entry under ‘Topography’ in
A dictionary of birds (1985). Spelling ofplacenames accords (unless
another source is specified) with the most recent edition (currently
tenth, 1999) of The Times atlas of the world', we use ‘South-East
Asia’ and ‘Vietnam’. Localities with well-known other spellings
or older names should have these placed in parentheses after their
first mention. For localities too small to be in the Times atlas a
source of the spelling adopted should preferably be indicated and
the precise geographical coordinates provided (these should be
doublechecked where possible). It is appreciated that authors will
not always have access to the above sources; in such cases the
editor will seek to introduce conformity.
English and scientific names of birds should follow those
provided by Inskipp,T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996)
An annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. On first
mention of a bird both English and scientific name should be
given, thereafter only one, preferably the English. Scientific
trinominals need be used only if subspecific nomenclature is
relevant to the topic under discussion. These recommendations
also apply for any other animal or plant species mentioned.
Italics are used for all words of foreign languages, including
generic and specific scientific names. Metric units and their
international symbols should be used; if it is necessary to cite other
systems of measurement, these can be added in parentheses.
Temperatures should be given in the Centigrade (Celsius) scale.
Numbers one to ten are written in full except when linked with a
measurement abbreviation or higher number, thus ‘five birds’ but
‘5 km’ and ‘5-12 birds’; numerals are used for all numbers above
ten, four-figure numbers and above using the comma thus: ‘1,234’,
‘12,345’. Single quotation marks are to be used. Details of
experimental technique, extensive tabulations of results, etc., are
best presented as appendices.
Authors of papers containing statistical analysis should observe
the provisions of the relevant section of ‘Notice to contributors’
in a recent Ibis. Dates should be written 1 January 1985, times of
day as 08h30, 17h55 (24-hour clock), etc. When citing a
conversation (‘verbally’) or letter (‘ in litt.’), the contact’s name
and initials should be included, preferably with the year of
communication. A full-length paper must include a summary not
exceeding 5% of the total length. Authors of papers are encouraged
to offer their work to one or more ornithologist or biologist for
critical assessment prior to submission to Forktail. Such help as is
received should naturally be mentioned in an acknowledgement
section before the full references are presented.
References in the text should follow the form ‘(Campbell and
Lack 1985)’ and ‘King et al. (1975) suggest...’. More than one
within the same parentheses should be chronologically listed,
alphabetically if of the same year. Publications by the same authors
in the same year may be distinguished by ‘a’, ‘b’, etc., after the
date. Full references must be listed alphabetically at the end in
the form:
Campbell, B. and Lack, E. eds. (1985) A dictionary of birds. Calton,
Staffordshire, U.K.: T. and A. D. Poyser.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M.W. (1975) A
field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Kuroda, Nh., ed. (1984) Ketteiban seibutsu daizukan;chorui
[Illustrations of animals and plants: birds]. Tokyo: Sekai
Bunkasha. (In Japanese.)
Rosljakov, G. E. (1985) [‘Information on the distribution and
numbers of Aix galericulata and Mergus squamatus over
Chabarovsk Territory.’] Pp. 101-102 in N. M. Litvinenko,
ed. Rare and endangered birds of the Far East. Vladivostok: Far
East Science Center, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. (In
Russian.)
Sien Yao-hua, Kuan Kuan-Hstin and Zheng Zuo-xin (1964) [‘An
avifaunal survey of the Chinghai province.’] Acta Zool. Sinica
16: 690-709. (In Chinese.)
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Borneo. Third edition. Kota
Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur: The Sabah Society and the
Malayan Nature Society.
Somadikarta, S. (1986) Collocalia linchi Horsfield & Moore - a
revision. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 106: 32-40.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia) :
an annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list no. 7).
It will be noted from these examples that references to non-
Roman scripts need to be transliterated and/or translated (or even,
with more recondite sources, both); either the transliterated title
may be left as it is, or a translation of it can be substituted in
square brackets (but where an abstract provides its own English
title, this may be cited in inverted commas within square brackets),
and the language involved should follow the reference, in
parentheses.
The author’s name, postal address and email address should
appear in italics at the end of the article.
Authors will receive proofs for checking, which they are
required to return within one week of receipt. All joint
communications must indicate the name and email address of the
author to whom proofs should be sent. Textual changes in proof
cannot normally be countenanced. Pdfs of the published pages
are available to authors on request.
Layout and typesetting by Peter Creed, Oxford, UK • peter@naturebureau.co.uk
Colour repro and printing by Crowes Complete Print, UK • (01603) 403349 • sales@crowes.co.uk
i 2°io) &
JNo. 23 August 2007
AlL
THENWWAL "" f
HISTORY MUSEUM
2 1 AUG 2007
PURCHASED
TRING UBRARY
jForktaft!^23
i
2007
OBC Council" ^ ' * J
Stephen BrDwnyfLLijjiTnan, Conservation Committee)
NigeLCoUarfChairmaiLPublications Committee)
Mike Edgecgnfbe'tlmJ motions)
Paul French (co-opted)
John Gregory
Tim Loseby (Art and Photographic Editor)
Steve Rowland (Chairman)
Tony Sawbridge (Secretary)
Graeme Spinks (Treasurer)
Brian Sykes (Admin)
Margaret Sykes (Membership Secretary)
Richard Thomas (Advertising)
Alan Wilkinson (Internet)
OBC Representatives
Susan Myers (Australia)
Paul Thompson (Bangladesh)
Filip Verbelen (Belgium)
Keo Omaliss (Cambodia)
Tony Gaston (Canada)
Ding Chang-qing (China)
Jiri Mlikovsky (Czech Republic)
Torben Lund (Denmark)
Hannu Jannes (Finland)
Axel Braunlich (Austria and Germany)
Richard Lewthwaite (Hong Kong)
Asad Rahmani and Vishnu Singh (India)
Ria Saryanthi (Indonesia)
Chris Murphy (Ireland)
Carlo Violani (Italy)
Akira Hibi (Japan)
Jin-Young Park (Korea)
Mike Chong and Ooi Chin Hock (Malaysia)
Charles Anderson (Maldives)
Nyambayar Batbayar (Mongolia)
Dr Tony Htin Hla (Myanmar [Burma])
Yub Raj Basnet (Nepal)
Jelle Scharringa and Bas van Balen (Netherlands)
Jan 0ve Gjershaug (Norway)
Aleem Ahmed Khan (Pakistan)
Carmela Espanola and Arne Jensen (Philippines)
Ray Tipper (Portugal)
Fang Woei-horng (Taiwan)
Lim Kim Seng (Singapore)
Adam Riley (South Africa)
Sarath Kotagama and Upali Ekanayake (Sri Lanka)
Per Alstrom (Sweden)
Beat Wartmann (Switzerland)
Philip Round (Thailand)
Robert Kennedy (USA)
Jonathan Eames and Nguyen Cu (Vietnam)
Publications Committee
Stuart Butchart, Nigel Collar, Tim Loseby, Rene Pop, Suhel Quader.
Nigel Redman, Brian Sykes, Richard Thomas
Conservation Committee
Nick Brickie, Stephen Browne, Dave Buckingham, Mike Crosby,
John Fellowes, Geoff Hilton, Jim Wardill, Simon Wotton
The Oriental Bird Club has been established for ornithologists
throughout the world, both amateur and professional, who share
a common interest in the region’s birds and wish to assist in
their conservation.
The Club aims to:
• Promote interest in the birds of the Oriental Region and
their conservation
• Liaise with, and promote the work of, existing regional
organisations
• Collate and publish material on Oriental birds
For Oriental nationals resident in the region.
We encourage all members to pay the full
rate if they can afford it
Supporting Member £25 p.a
Funding one Oriental member in addition
to Ordinary membership
Libraries and Academic Institutions £25 p.a.
Business Supporter £45 p.a
The Oriental Bird Club is a Registered Charity No. 297242
For further information please write to:
Oriental Bird Club, P.O. Box 324, Bedford MK42 OWG, U.K.
OBC Email address OBC Web Site
mail@orientalbirdclub.org http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/
The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of Oriental Bird Club concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Cover picture: Rufous-throated White-eye Madanga ruficollis,
Buru, South Maluku, Indonesia, August 2006.
Photograph by Robert Hutchinson/Birdtour Asia.
ISSN 0950-1746
© Oriental Bird Club 2007
FORKTAIL
Number 23, 2007
Senior Editors:
Suhel Quader
(National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India)
THE NATUKAl
HISTORY MUSEUM
2 1 AUG 2007
PURCHASED
TfllNG LIBRARY
Stuart Butchart
Associate Editors:
Will Duckworth, Jack Tordoff and Andrew Radford
CONTENTS
AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR
An annotated list of birds wintering in the Lhasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco,
Tibet Autonomous Region, China . 1
ANTERO LINDHOLM and ANDREAS LINDEN
Some notes on the distribution and songs of two Oriental Cuckoo taxa, Cuculus ( saturatus ) saturatus
and Cuculus ( saturatus ) optatus . 12
ASHOK VERMA and VIBHU PRAKASH
Winter roost habitat use by Eurasian Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus in and around
Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India . 17
JEROME FUCHS, ALICE CIBOIS, J. W. DUCKWORTH, ROLAND EVE,
WILLIAM G. ROBICHAUD, TED TIZARD and DIRK VAN GANSBERGHE
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos .
LAURENT MOLARD, MARC KERY and CLAYTON M. WHITE
Estimating the resident population size of Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus in Peninsular Malaysia . 87
LEE KWOK SHING, CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK, LU GANG and SU WEN-BA
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China: results from winter waterbird surveys 2003-2007 . 92
NIAL MOORES
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea . 102
NICHAYA PRADITSUP, AMARA NAKSATHIT and PHILIP ROUND
Observations on the Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand . 125
P. R. SWEET, J. W. DUCKWORTH, T. J. TROMBONE and L. ROBIN
The Hall collection of birds from Wonsan, central Korea, in spring 1903 . 129
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
New records of birds from the Maldives . 135
S. HARSHA K. SATISCHANDRA, ENOKA P. KUDAVIDANAGE, SARATH W. KOTAGAMA
and EBEN GOODALE
The benefits of joining mixed-species flocks for Greater Racket-tailed Drongos Dicrurus paradiseus . 145
Short Notes
A. TOWNSEND PETERSON
Three new records from Lubang island, Philippines . 149
ABDUL JAMIL URFI, THANGARASU MEGANATHAN and ABDUL KALAM
Nesting ecology of the Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala at Sultanpur National Park, Haryana, India . 150
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
White-winged Duck Cairina ( =Asarcomis) scutulata and Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus:
two new country records for Bhutan . 153
COLIN R. TRAINOR and PEDRO J. LEITAO
Further significant bird records from Atauro Island, Timor-Leste (East Timor) . 155
FRANK E. RHEINDT and ROBERT O. HUTCHINSON
New island records and new elevational records of birds from South Maluku, Indonesia . 158
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR, ARPIT DEOMURARI, YASHODHAN BHATIA
and S. PRASANTH NARAYANAN
Records of Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus breeding pairs fledging four chicks . 161
PETER CUTTER, PASSANAN BOONTUA and KRIANGSAK SRI-BUAROD
A recent record of Storm’s Stork Ciconia stormi in Thailand . 163
KANDARP KATHJU
Observations of unusual clutch size, renesting and egg concealment by Sarus Cranes Griis antigone in
Gujarat, India . 165
MARK MALLALIEU
Greater Spotted Eagles Aquila clanga in central Thailand . 167
Y. H. CHAN, M. ZAFIRAH, M. CREMADES, M. DIVET, C. H. R. TEO and S. C. NG
Infanticide-cannibalism in the Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris . 170
PIERRE VAN DER WIELEN
Chestnut-cheeked Starling Sturnus philippensis: new for the Indian subcontinent . 173
ROLAND EVE
First record of Rufous-bellied Woodpecker Dendrocopos hyperythrus in Lao PDR . 174
R. PRO B ST, M. PAVLICEV and R. SCHMID
Differences in the diet of three Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus pairs nesting in Chukotka,
north-east Russia . 175
BAILEY D. MCKAY and YI-WEN PENG
First likely breeding record of Yellow-billed Grosbeak Eophona migratoria for Kinmen Island, Taiwan . 177
CHRIS R. SHEPHERD
Breeding records and observations of the Little Egret Egretta garzetta in peninsular Malaysia . 178
HARKIRAT SINGH SANGHA and RISHAD NAOROJI
New and significant records of birds in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India . 179
NICOLANTONIO AGOSTINI and UGO MELLONE
Migration strategies of Oriental Honey-buzzards Peniis ptilorhyncus breeding in Japan . 182
ROBERT HUTCHINSON, JAMES EATON, BRAM DEMEULEMEESTER
and FRANK E. RHEINDT
Observations of Flores Scops Owl Otus alfredi on Flores, Indonesia, with a first description
of its vocalisations . 184
Guidelines for contributors
inside back cover
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 1-11
An annotated list of birds wintering in the Lhasa
river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet
Autonomous Region, China
AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR
The occurrence and distribution of birds in the Lhasa river watershed of Tibet Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China, is not
well documented. Here we report on recent observations of birds made during the winter season (November-March). Combining these
observations with earlier records shows that at least 115 species occur in the Lhasa river watershed and adjacent Yamzho Yumco lake
during the winter. Of these, at least 88 species appear to occur regularly and 29 species are represented by only a few observations. We
recorded 18 species not previously noted during winter. Three species noted from Lhasa in the 1940s, Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata,
Solitary Snipe Gallinago solitaria and Red-rumped Swallow Hirundo daurica, were not observed during our study. Black-necked Crane
Grus nigricollis (Vulnerable) and Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus are among the more visible species in the agricultural habitats which
dominate the valley floors. There is still a great deal to be learned about the winter birds of the region, as evidenced by the number of
apparently new records from the last 15 years.
INTRODUCTION
The Lhasa river watershed in Tibet Autonomous Region,
People’s Republic of China, is an important wintering
area for a number of migratory and resident bird species.
The valleys of the Lhasa river watershed are an important
wintering area for c. 1,300 Black-necked Cranes Grus
nigricollis (Bishop etal. 2000) and 4,000 Bar-headed Geese
Anser indicus (Bishop etal. 1997). The region is also home
to two species endemic to the Tibetan Plateau: Tibetan
Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon harmani and Giant Babax
Babax waddelli (Lu 2004, Rasmussen and Anderton 2005);
and one near-endemic: Brown-cheeked Laughingthrush
Garrulax henrici (MacKinnon et al. 2000).
Despite the ornithological importance of the region,
accurate and current information on bird distribution,
especially during the winter months, is relatively scant.
There are few published surveys or studies, and most
birders visiting the area do so during the spring and
summer. The best ornithological information on the Lhasa
area available in English comes from British military and
diplomatic personnel. On 3 August 1904, the British
Expedition commanded by Col. Francis Younghusband,
entered Lhasa and made the first ornithological records
from the capital. Included in this expedition were three
birdwatchers: Captain H. J. Walton, Lieutenant-colonel
L. A. Waddell and Lieutenant F. M. Bailey. Walton
published a list of 99 species from Tibet (Walton 1906),
and Waddell (1905) provided an abbreviated bird list in
the appendices to his book on Tibet. Bailey returned several
times to south-eastern Tibet, and the records from these
explorations are still the major source of ornithological
data from this region (Bailey 1913). The most complete
bird list for the Lhasa area was compiled by Frank Ludlow
while assigned to the British Diplomatic Mission in the
1 940s (Ludlow 1 950), and this remains the best reference
to date. In 1972, Charles Vaurie published Tibet and its
birds, but this book was a review of the literature and
museum specimens; he never visited Tibet himself.
China’s Academica Sinica and Forestry Department
organised a series of scientific expeditions from 1959 to
1989 (Zheng etal. 1983, Yin and Liu 1993). Mostsurveys
occurred during the late spring and summer months and
visited remote areas. Access to Tibet by foreigners was
limited from the late 1 940s to the early 1 980s. By the late
1980s the first joint ventures with foreign companies were
initiated and some of the first foreign non-governmental
organisations were allowed into Tibet, enabling our own
observations. In this paper we have compiled these records
as well as other available information on birds in the region
during winter. We provide some conclusions, when
possible, regarding abundance, distribution, and timing
of arrival and departure of migrants.
STUDY AREA
Located in south-central Tibet (Fig. 1), the Lhasa river
is a major tributary of the Y arlung Zangbo (^Brahmaputra
river); it includes the Tolung and Phenpo tributaries
draining from the north and west, and Meldro Phu from
the east. There are also lesser rivers, some of which are
seasonal, that primarily drain the southern and eastern
parts of the watershed. Lhasa itself is situated in the south¬
western part of the watershed at 29°36'N 91°06'E.
Yamzho Yumco (Yamdrok Yutso) is a large natural lake
c.25 km south of the Lhasa river. We include this because
of its proximity to the Lhasa river watershed and its
importance for migratory and wintering waterfowl.
Principal location names are taken from Times Atlas
(Times 1999) and, when available, are followed by a
transliteration in Tibetan in parentheses as shown on
maps in Dorje (2004).
The city of Lhasa lies at an altitude of 3,650 m and
enjoys a surprisingly pleasant climate. Winters are cool
and dry; the average daily minimum and maximum
temperatures at Lhasa during January, the coldest month,
are -13. 1°C and 5.7°C respectively. October-April is the
dry season and during this time precipitation is rare,
especially in the valleys. Any localised snowfall that does
occur typically melts quickly. High winds occur regularly
throughout the region during January-April, often causing
dust storms in the afternoon and lifting sand from the
dried river bed high up the hillsides (Bishop et al. 1998).
Major habitat types in the valleys include: pasture,
shrub-steppe, rivers and their associated floodplains,
freshwater marshes and agricultural fields (see Bishop
et al. 1998 for a description of plant species in these
9
AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR
Forktail 23 (2007)
habitats). Most of the valley floors are farmed, and major
agricultural crops include barley, spring and winter wheat,
broad beans and mustard. Freshwater marshes are
common in the Phenpo river valley, but rare elsewhere.
Two major reservoirs in Phenpo valley, Kazi and Hutou,
and the natural lake of Yamzho Y umco, provide the most
important lacustrine habitat within the watershed. The
river valleys are surrounded by hills and mountains rising
to an altitude of 5,400 m in the central areas of the
watershed, while many of the high mountains defining
the boundaries of the watershed exceed 6,000 m. A few
peaks exceed 7,000 m at the north-west corner of the
watershed. Most hillsides are uncultivated and sparsely
vegetated with hardy plants able to withstand arid
conditions and grazing by sheep, goats and yaks. Common
hillside shrub species include Salix sclerophylla, Spirace
alpina , Rhododendron spp. and Sabina pingii (Lu 2004).
The ridge-tops themselves support sparsely vegetated
alpine tundra habitat, including Silene spp. and Saxifraga
spp. They are generally free from snow throughout the
winter, except for the tallest mountains in the north and
north-west. Several mountain ridges in the region,
including ones at Sera, Ganden and Drigung Til
monasteries, are sites for sky burials — the traditional
Tibetan ‘burial’ method where the deceased is divided
into pieces and offered to birds. Not surprisingly these
sites are major attractors for scavengers. However, they
are all officially off-limits to foreigners.
METHODS
We each made observations in and around Lhasa for at
least two winter seasons. ALS lived in and birded the
Lhasa area from 1988 to 1992 (Le Sueur 2003). MAB
conducted research on Black-necked Crane and Bar¬
headed Geese on behalf of the International Crane
Foundation in all winters since 1990 except the three
winters 1996-1999. AL spent November 2003-January
2004 and October-December 2004 living in the Lhasa
area while working on an environmental education project
for the International Crane Foundation.
Forktail 23 (2007) Birds wintering in the Llasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet, China
3
4 AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR Forktail 23 (2007)
The major sites at which observations were made are
described in Table 1 . For this paper, we define winter as
November-March. Records of birds occurring during
this period that are believed to represent late or early
migrants rather than wintering birds are noted as such.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Our observations, in combination with previous records,
show that at least 115 species occur in the Lhasa river
watershed and adjacent Yamzho Yumco lake during the
winter season. Of these, at least 88 species appear to occur
regularly and 29 species are represented by only a few
observations. Five additional species are included in the
checklist but their status is uncertain or unconfirmed (see
Appendix). We did not observe two species noted by
Ludlow (1950) as common in Lhasa in the 1940s: Solitary
Snipe Gallinago solitaria and Red-rumped Swallow Hirundo
daurica, nor did we observe Northern Shoveler Anas
clypeata, described by Ludlow (1950) as ‘occur [ring]
during the winter.’ We did record 18 species previously
not noted during winter: Common Shelduck Tadoma
tadoma. Smew Mergellus albellus, Snow Pigeon Columba
leuconota, Common Coot Fulica atra, Spotted Redshank
Tringa erythropus, Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola, Ruff
Philomachus pugnax, Black-headed Gull Lams ridibundus,
Little Grebe Tachybaptus nificollis, Great Egret Casmerodius
albus, Long-tailed Shrike Lanins schach, Grey-backed
Shrike Lanins tephronotus, Kessler’s Thrush Turdus kessleri,
Common Stonechat Saxicola torquata, White-cheeked
Starling Stumus cineraceus, Coal Tit Pams ater, Eurasian
Crag Martin Himndo mpestris and Asian House Martin
Delichon dasypus. We do not include in this list of new
winter records species which are only represented by
sightings that likely represent late autumn migrants or
early spring migrants. There is still a great deal to be learned
about the winter birds of the region, as evidenced by the
number of apparently new records from the last 1 5 years.
As more ornithologists and birders visit the region during
the winter months new species will undoubtedly be added
to this list and a number of species that have only been
recorded once or twice may well be found to occur more
regularly in the region.
During the past 1 5 years, the Chinese government has
established two nature reserves aimed at benefiting birds
in the Lhasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco. In 1993,
as a result of the joint China-USA winter crane surveys
(Bishop et al. 1998, 2000, Bishop and Li 2002) and of
local governmental interest, the 96.8 km2 Phenpo Black¬
necked Crane Reserve was established by the Lhasa
Municipal Government in Lhiinzhub (Lhundrub) county.
When it was created, the reserve was the first and only
designated nature reserve for wintering Black-necked
Cranes in Tibet. In 2003, the Tibet Autonomous Regional
Government established the 6,143 km2 Yarlung Zangbo
River Middle Reaches Black-necked Crane Nature Reserve
(Forestry Administration of Tibet Autonomous Region
2004). This expanded the area protected in the Phenpo
river valley and included additional areas along the Lhasa
river and around Y amzho Y umco. A second nature reserve,
Lhalu Wetlands, is the only remaining tract of native
marshland in the immediate Lhasa area. This was
designated a provincial reserve in 1995, and since 2005 it
has been listed as a national nature reserve.
Despite the designation of these two important nature
reserves, habitat loss continues to be a problem throughout
the region. Population growth and economic
development, especially in and around the city of Lhasa
and the major county towns of the watershed, has led to
the loss of many natural wetlands and agricultural lands,
which are critical wintering habitats for Bar-headed Geese,
shorebirds and Black-necked Cranes. Tree planting, a
government-sanctioned means of reclaiming wetlands, is
also affecting smaller wetlands in the Phenpo river valley
and surrounding valleys. Cultivated fields around
populated areas are being rapidly converted for
commercial uses, especially greenhouses, as well as for
industrial and residential developments. Within the last
20 years, electricity transmission lines have proliferated
throughout the watershed (Bishop and Tsamchu 2005),
although their impacts on birds have yet to be determined.
Climate change is also a cause for concern throughout
the region as well as in the rest of the eastern Himalayas:
as glaciers recede with warming temperatures, river
regimes and vegetation composition will be altered.
Outbreaks of the avian influenza virus H5N 1 pose a
major conservation concern for waterbirds, especially for
Forktail 23 (2007) Birds wintering in the Llasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet, China
5
Bar-headed Geese. In 2005, more than 5,000 Bar-headed
Geese died during an outbreak in Qinghai province (Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
2005). Live poultry operations, including ducks, geese
and quail, have been linked to the recent rise in outbreaks
of FUN 1. Around Lhasa, confirmed outbreaks of H5N1
associated with poultry operations occurred in January
2004 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations 2004) and August 2005 (World Organisation for
Animal Health 2005). More recently, in May 2006, an
outbreak of H5N1 was confirmed in wild birds around
Lhasa and north of the watershed around Nachu (World
Organisation for Animal Health 2006) . Bar-headed Geese
are bred in captivity for commercial purposes, presumably
for meat and eggs, and production facilities exist near
Yamzho Yumco. In the Phenpo river valley, a domestic
waterfowl production facility is located on the edge of a
wetland used regularly by a variety of shorebirds, gulls,
and waterfowl including Bar-headed Goose and Ruddy
Shelduck. With >25% of Tibet’s wintering Bar-headed
Goose population residing in the Lhasa river watershed
(Bishop etal. 1997), an outbreak of avian influenza in the
wild waterfowl population could be disastrous.
Although the avifauna of the Lhasa river watershed
and Yamzho Yumco has generally been understudied,
our work confirms the region’s ornithological importance.
The growing human population’s demand for natural
resources, however, is contributing to a rapid habitat
conversion and loss. Conservation education, especially
around Lhasa and in areas such as the Phenpo valley, will
be crucial to ensure that the Lhasa river watershed and
Yamzho Yumco retain bird habitats that can sustain
wintering bird populations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Jim Harkness, Song Yanling, Tsamchu Drolma and Li
Fengshan for their assistance in the field. Comments by Marc Foggin,
Jesper Hornskov and Xu Lin greatly improved the manuscript. We
thank our colleagues at the Tibet Plateau Institute of Biology and Tibet
Forestry Administration for making our work possible . Research by AL
and MAB was supported by grants to the International Crane
Foundation from the Brehm Fund for International Bird Conservation,
Chicago Zoological Society, General Service Foundation, Felburn
Foundation, U.S. Department of State, World Wildlife Fund-U.S.,
Swordpoint Foundation and Wildlife Conservation Society.
REFERENCES
Bailey, F. M. (1913) Some notes on mammals and birds in south¬
eastern Tibet. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 22: 366-369.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge U.K.: BirdLife International.
Bishop, M. A. and Li, F. (2002) Effects of farming practices in Tibet
on Black-necked Crane Grus nigricollis diet and food availability.
Biodiv. Sci. 10: 393-398. (In Chinese.)
Bishop, M. A., Harris, J. and Canjue, Z. (2000) Agricultural
management zones for Bar-headed Geese and Black-necked Cranes
in Tibet. Pp. 55-60 in Wu Ning, D. Miller, LuZhi and J. Springer,
eds. Tibet’s biodiversity conservation and management. Beijing: China
Forestry Publishing House.
Bishop, M. A. and Tsamchu D. (2005) [History and influence of a
nature reserve on a local population of wintering Black-necked
Cranes in Tibet.] Pp. 30-35 in Wang Qi-Shan and Li Feng-Shan,
eds. Crane research in China. Kunming: Yunnan Nationalities
Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
Bishop, M. A., Song, Y., Canjue, Z. and Gu, B. (1997) Bar-headed
Geese Anser indicus wintering in south-central Tibet. Wildfowl 48:
118-126.
Bishop, M. A., Canjue, Z., Song, Y., Harkness, J. and Gu, B. (1998)
Winter habitat use by Black-necked Cranes Grus nigricollis in Tibet.
Wildfowl 49: 228-241.
Dorje, G. (2004) Footprint Tibet. 3rd ed. Bath, U.K.: Footprint Books.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2004) Avian
Influenza Disease Emergency Bulletin Issue 6. Downloaded from
www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/152954/AVIbull006x.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2005) Avian
Influenza Disease Emergency Bulletin Issue 33. Downloaded from
www.fao.org/ag/againfo/subjects/en/health/diseases-cards/
avian_update.html
Forestry Administration of Tibet Autonomous Region (2004) Life on
theworldroof — forestry ecology in Tibet, China. Beijing: Encyclopaedia
of China Publishing House.
Le Sueur, A. (2003) The hotel on the roof of the world: from miss Tibet to
Shangri-La. Oakland, U.S. A: RDR Publishers.
Li, F. and Yang, F. (2005) [Distribution and population of Black¬
necked Cranes on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau.] Pp. 29-43 in
Wang Qi-Shan and Li Fengshan, eds. Crane research in China.
Kunming: Yunnan Nationalities Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
Lu, X. (2004) Conservation status and reproductive ecology of giant
babax Babax waddelli (Aves, Timaliinae), endemic to the Tibetan
plateau. Oryx 38: 418-425.
Ludlow, F. (1950) The birds of Lhasa. Ibis 92: 34-45.
MacKinnon J., Phillipps, K. and Fen-qi, H. (2000) A field guide to the
birds of China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rasmussen, P.C (2005) Revised species limits and field identification
of Asian rosefmches. BirdingASIA 3: 18-27.
Rasmussen, P. C and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Robson, C. R. (1986) Recent observation of birds in Xizang and Qinghai
provinces, China. Forktail 2: 67-82.
Times (1999) The Times atlas of the world. 10th edition. New York:
Crown Publishers.
Vaurie, C. (1972) Tibet and its birds. London: H.F. & G. Witherby Ltd.
Waddell, L. A. (1905) Lhasa and its mysteries — with a record of the
expedition of 1903 to 1904. New York: Dutton.
Walton, H. J. (1906) On the birds of Southern Tibet. (In two parts.)
Ibis (8)6: 57-84; 225-256.
World Organisation for Animal Health (2005) Highly pathogenic avian
influenza in China. Follow-up report no. 2. Disease information 1 8 (32) .
Downloaded from www.oie.int/eng/info/hebdo/AIS_58.HTM
World Organisation for Animal Health (2006) Highly pathogenic avian
influenza in China (in wildlife). Follow-up report no. 3. Disease
information 1 9 (24) . Downloaded from www.oie.int/eng/info/hebdo/
AIS_12.HTM#Sec7
Yin,B. GandLiu, W. L. (1993) [Precious and rare wildlife and its protection
in Tibet.} Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
Zheng, Z. , Li, D. , Wang, Z. , Wang, Z., Jiang, Z. and Lu.,T. 1983. [The
avifauna of Xizang: The comprehensive scientific expedition to Qinghai-
xizang Plateau] . Beijing and Xining: Academica Sinica. (In Chinese.)
Aaron Lang and Mary Anne Bishop, International Crane Foundation, PO Box 447, Baraboo, WI 53913-0447, U.S. A.
Email: aaron__lang8@yahoo.com, mbishop@ctcak.net
Alec Le Sueur, Email: alec.lesueur@jerseymail.co.uk
6 AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007) Birds wintering in the Llasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet, China
7
however, do remain through the winter. Largest flock: four
birds at Lhalu Wetlands on 4 January 2004.
8
AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR
Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007) Birds wintering in the Llasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet, China 9
10 AARON LANG, MARY ANNE BISHOP and ALEC LE SUEUR Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007) Birds wintering in the Llasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco, Tibet, China 1 1
with both seen on one occasion at Terdrom. Most sightings
(where subspecies was noted) were of the nominate race thura.
However, a pair showing the characteristics of feminius was
seen at Reting on 1 9 November 2004. Two days later a female
feminius was seen at Terdrom, where in January 2004 we
recorded nominate thura. Both records of feminius were
identified on the basis of the females lacking a warm buffy-
brown wash on the breast (Rasmussen 2005) . Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005) suggested that Chinese White-browed
Rosefinch C. dubius (including feminius) warrants specific status.
Key
1 Square brackets indicate that the occurrence of a species in the region in winter is unconfirmed. Acronyms within parentheses denote IU CN
Red List category following BirdLife International (2001): EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, NT = Near Threatened.
2 A = Abundant: the species occurs regularly in apparently suitable habitat, and/or the region regularly hosts very large numbers.
C = Common: the species occurs regularly in nearly all apparently suitable habitat, but some areas are occupied sparsely or not at all,
and/or the region regularly hosts large numbers.
F = Fairly common: the species occurs regularly in only some of the apparently suitable habitat, and large areas are occupied sparsely or
not at all, and/or the region regularly hosts moderate numbers.
U = Uncommon: the species occurs regularly, but in very little of the apparently suitable habitat, and/or the region regularly hosts small
numbers of the species.
R = Rare: the species occurs, or probably occurs, regularly within the region, but in very small numbers.
* = The species has been observed in the Lhasa river watershed too few times to assess abundance accurately; occurrences are listed in the
notes column.
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 12-16
Some notes on the distribution and songs of two
Oriental Cuckoo taxa5 Cuculus ( saturatus ) saturatus
and Cuculus {saturatus) optatus
ANTERO LINDHOLM and ANDREAS LINDEN
The Oriental Cuckoo Cuculus saturatus ( sensu lato) is a widespread Palearctic non-passerine, which has recently been shown to have
distinct songs in different areas. We analyse this variation further, and also show that it is more complex than earlier described. Song
recordings of the taxa C. ( saturatus ) optatus and C. (s.) saturatus originating from Russia, Eastern China (Hebei province). Southern China
(Sichuan province), Taiwan and the northern Indian subcontinent were studied using sound spectrogram analysis. The Southern China
and Indian subcontinent samples were similar to each other, but all the other samples were distinctive.
INTRODUCTION
In recent publications (e.g. Payne 1997, 2005, King 2005)
the two widely distributed subspecies of Oriental Cuckoo
Cuculus saturatus have been regarded as two separate
species. King (2005) designated C. ( s .) optatus Oriental
Cuckoo and C. ( s .) saturatus Himalayan Cuckoo, but in
this article we use the scientific names optatus and saturatus,
without expressing any opinion on their taxonomic status.
The most important argument for treating them as two
separate species is said to be their different courtship
vocalisations, here referred to as song.
The geographical distribution of optatus covers a broad
zone from Eastern Europe through the Siberian boreal
forests to the Pacific shores. It also continues to Sakhalin
Island, the Kuril Islands, Japan and China southwards to
the region of the river Yangzi (=Yangtze) (Cramp 1985).
According to Payne (2005), saturatus breeds from Pakistan
east through the Himalayas to South China and Taiwan.
The song of optatus has been described in detail in
several sources, e.g. Thiede and Wallschlager (2000),
Lindholm and Linden (2003), King (2005) and Payne
(2005). In brief, it is a sequence of two low and soft
similar notes preceded by a series of faster and even softer
similar notes. No geographical variation has been found
in this song. The song of saturatus has been described by
Wells and Becking (1 97 5), King (2005) and Payne (2005).
It has been described as consisting of 4-5 notes (King
2005) or 3-5 notes (Payne 2005), where the first note is
weaker, higher and shorter. The remaining notes are
similar to each other.
In this article we present some additional findings about
the songs and distributions of these two taxa. The third
taxon of ‘Oriental Cuckoo’, Sunda Lesser Cuckoo C. (5.)
lepidus, also has a distinctive song, and it is nowadays most
often recognised as a distinct species (Wells and Becking
1 975, Payne 2005). It occurs as a resident on the Malayan
Peninsula and several Indonesian islands.
METHODS
The recordings used for the analyses presented here are
mainly from T aiwan and from Hebei, Shanxi and Sichuan
provinces of China. In addition, some are from the
northern Indian subcontinent: one from Sikkim, two from
Meghalaya, three from Nepal, and two from Bhutan. For
details about the recordings see Table 1. All these
recordings were analysed in the same way, and were
compared with 58 individuals from Russia’s northern
taiga belt: from Komi, European Russia to Primorskiy,
Far Eastern Russia (largely the same material referred to
in Lindholm and Linden 2003). If the Yangzi River is
regarded as an approximate border between optatus and
saturatus, the material from Hebei and Shanxi provinces
of Eastern China should clearly be of the northern ( optatus )
type, Sichuan is close to the border and the Indian
subcontinent is south of it.
We use here mostly the same terms as in Lindholm
and Linden (2003): sequence, soft phrase (the initial part
of the sequence), phrase ( BU-BU ), note (the syllables of
song, BU), period length (time interval between
subsequent beginnings of phrases, sometimes called
‘interphase interval’), basic rhythm (other parts of the
sequence than the soft phrase), introductory note (initial
note of a phrase, called ‘weak note’ by Lindholm and
Linden 2003) and main notes (other notes) (Fig. la). By
the number of notes in a phrase we mean the total number
of notes, including the introductory note when present.
In this material, all phrases with three or more notes
included the introductory note, and none with two had it.
For methods of measuring song parameters, see Lindholm
and Linden (2003). In brief, the timing of the notes was
measured from three successive phrases, randomly
selected from a continuous and regular part of the song.
The averages of these measurements were selected to
represent the individual. The frequencies of the notes
were measured from one randomly selected phrase.
Different spectrogram bandwidths were used to optimise
resolution when measuring frequency and timing,
respectively. Sound spectrogram software programs used
were Sound Ruler by Marcos Gridi-Papp, and Raven
Lite 1.0 by the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.
Univariate descriptive statistics for each variable are
presented for each area. Estimated arithmetic means,
standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals for the
means are reported. Assuming normality of samples, the
confidence intervals for means were calculated as
— SD
X ± tcril , where Nis sample size (number of different
individuals) and t m is the 0.975th quantile of a t-
distribution with N- 1 degrees of freedom. Non-normality
of samples may give rise to inaccurate confidence intervals,
even if the method is quite robust for some types of non-
Forktail 23 (2007)
Notes on the distribution and song of two Oriental Cuckoo taxa
13
Table 1. Oriental Cuckoo recordings analysed. Reference numbers, where available, are from the British Library National Sound Archive
(BLNSA). Recordings with missing reference numbers have not yet been submitted to the BLNSA. Where latitude and longitude were not
included in the recording documentation (marked by an asterisk) they were taken from a map or other sources.
Country /
normality. The null hypothesis of normality was tested
using Lilliefors’s test (Lilliefors 1967). Possibly inaccurate
confidence intervals are pointed out in the results.
A cautionary note about our analyses is needed because
cuckoo songs may vary according to social context. For
example, a series of recordings of a male from Huben,
Taiwan, on 22 April 2006, includes several female calls,
and a female was observed interacting with the male by,
for example, flying together. Every time the male heard
the female call, it stopped singing at once, but started
again very soon, with or without a soft phrase . There were
several soft phrases following each other, as well as guttural
calls, which were quite similar to the corresponding call
of Eurasian Cuckoo Cuculus canoms. There were some
irregularities in the rhythm of the normal call, especially
several one-note phrases. But there was no change in
pitch or speed in the normal basic rhythm . It is also possible
that the song varies according to the time of year relative
to breeding, but our samples are too few for detailed
analysis of this factor. Eurasian Cuckoos apparently may
sing songs out of tune during the late breeding period
(Payne 2005). We have not seen or heard evidence for
this kind of variation in saturatus or optatus, nor seen it
mentioned in the literature. Such variation should,
however, be easy to notice and we doubt that our analyses
are affected by it.
RESULTS
Our major results are presented in Table 2 and Figs. 1
and 2. Two raw variables (frequency of the first main note
and period length) separated the groups almost equally
well as a canonical discriminant analysis, and were for
simplicity used here as such. In the following paragraphs
the main results are described.
Song on the Indian subcontinent
The normal type of the song has four notes: it starts with
an introductory note, which is shorter, higher-pitched
and weaker than the others and it is followed by three very
similar main notes. The song of one individual in our
sample mainly consisted of five-note phrases, but one
phrase was of four notes. Another normally used four
notes, but had five in one phrase, and a third individual
had four notes apart from one phrase with three. The
remaining six individuals used four notes for the whole of
the recorded time. The average period length of these
14
ANTERO LINDHOLM and ANDREAS LINDEN
Forktail 23 (2007)
Table 2. Univariate results of the sound analysis. Numbers represent mean±SD, with 95% confidence limits on the mean in curly brackets. In
samples for which the null hypothesis of normality was rejected, the confidence intervals may be inaccurate and these are marked with an asterisk.
1 Numbers (of notes) in parentheses were found in the recordings, but not in the analysed sections of the recordings.
Time (s)
Figure 1 (left) . Sound spectrograms of Oriental Cuckoos made using
the following specifications: sample rate 8000, FFT-size 4096,
Biackmann-FIarris window with width 600 smpl, overlap 584 smpl.
This equals a frequency resolution of about 2 Hz and a time resolution
of 0.002 s. (a) A bird recorded at Huben, Taiwan, on 23 April 2006.
A soft phrase followed by two basic rhythm phrases with two notes
each. The time difference between the first notes of two successive
basic rhythm phrases is the period length of the song, (b) Abird recorded
at Lao Ling, Hebei, China, on 21 May 2002. Two phrases, both with
three notes, of which the first is the introductory note, (c) A bird recorded
at Shanxi, China, on 1 June 1995.
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Period length (s)
Figure 2 . Scatterplot of period length versus frequency of the first note
in the sound samples. The Shanxi sample is not plotted. Perpendicular
lines denote means and 95% confidence intervals of the mean for the
different areas: reading from the left, Russia, Taiwan, Hebei, Sichuan,
and the Indian subcontinent.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Notes on the distribution and song of two Oriental Cuckoo taxa
15
southern recordings is over two seconds, which is due to
the large number of notes. The frequency difference
between the main notes is small in this sample too.
Song in Sichuan
With the exception of one, all seven recordings have four
notes, the first of which is the introductory note. The last
three notes are very similar to each other, and the frequency
difference is again negligible. The exception also has a
four-noted basic rhythm, but in part of the recording the
bird seems to be very excited, with many irregularities in
the song, including some five -note and three-note phrases.
The period length in Sichuan is about two seconds. In
practice the songs are very similar to those of the Indian
subcontinent.
Song in Russia
Our song material from Eastern Europe and Siberia is as
described in the literature for optatus. The two notes of
the phrase are very similar to each other, but the first is
very slightly higher-pitched on average. The song is fast,
period length is only slightly more than one second, and
the pitch is quite low, averaging 400 Hz.
Song in Taiwan
Although the Oriental Cuckoos in T aiwan were described
as nominate saturatus in earlier publications (e.g. Payne
2005), King (2005) included one recording from that
island which was of optatus type, and Anderson (2005)
mentioned that the four individuals he heard there were
of this type and not like saturatus.
Between 1 7 and 28 April 2006, Antero Lindholm and
Annika Forsten heard 18 calling male Oriental Cuckoos
in Taiwan, of which eight were sound-recorded, and our
sample of Taiwan songs consists of these recordings. All
birds were heard at an altitude of 180-1,700 m except
one, which was heard on an intensively farmed lowland
plain almost at sea level (this individual was not sound-
recorded, or included in the analysis). The mountain
birds were considered to be local breeding birds and not
passage migrants because they were observed at several
sites in the Central Mountains, where all other obvious
passage migrants were absent (in contrast to the lowlands
and coast) . We even observed interactions between males
and females, and also sound-recorded female calls. All
these birds had song structure of optatus type: they had no
introductory notes and just two main notes. Soft phrases
were heard as in our material from Russia (see Lindholm
and Linden 2003).
The recorded eight individuals have a mean period of
1.16 seconds, and the time interval between notes is 0.23
seconds. Both these time measurements are similar to
Russian optatus (Lindholm and Linden 2003), but there
is a small but statistically significant difference from
Russian optatus in period length. Average frequencies are
475 Hz and 470 Hz, for the first and second note
respectively, and these are clearly higher than in normal
Siberian and Eastern European Oriental Cuckoos. This
means that in Taiwan the song is similar to that heard in
Siberia, but higher-pitched. Fig. 1 a shows a typical section
of a song from Taiwan.
Song in Hebei and Shanxi
The Hebei province lies far north of the described
distribution area of saturatus. However, from our material,
it is clear that the song is different from that of Siberian
and Eastern European optatus and closer to saturatus.
The Hebei recordings are all from Lao Ling, near the
town Qinghuangdao. In all nine analysed samples, and in
every single phrase recorded, there is a introductory note.
This makes Oriental Cuckoos from this area easily
separable from the Siberian ones. In every sample
analysed, there are three notes and the two main notes are
of very similar pitch in comparison to each other. In
other parts of the recordings, which were not included
in the sample analysed, (presumably) the same
individuals uttered a four-note phrase on many
occasions, with the introductory note followed by three
similar notes. In one recording, the individual clearly
switches from a four-note phrase to a three-note. In that
same recording, a call, similar to the soft phrase of the
Siberian type, is heard; it is harsher and more barking
than in Siberia.
The song in Lao Ling is slightly higher-pitched than
in Siberia. The period is longer, which is due to the phrases
including more notes. Fig. lb shows a typical section of
song from Lao Ling.
The only recording available from Shanxi province
consisted of four notes, as in the recordings from Sichuan
and the Indian subcontinent. The song was quite fast and
high-pitched, but fell within the range of the Hebei
samples. A spectrogram of this song is shown in Fig. lc.
However, as this is a single recording, any conclusions
must remain tentative.
Visual characters
The taxa saturatus and optatus are normally separable using
measurements of the flattened and straightened wing. In
male saturatus the wing length is usually shorter than
198 mm, and in male optatus most are longer than
204 mm. These crude limits are based on our own
measurements from skins collected within the breeding
area and housed at the Natural History Museum, Tring
(NHM): male optatus from Japan and Russia 202-
216 mm (N=5), male saturatus from Himalayas and
Southern China, excluding Taiwan 183-1 98 mm (N=10).
The samples are small and in the migration and wintering
areas it is easy to find birds that fall between these two
limits. For example, in Australia, it was easy to identify all
males as optatus using measurements but among females
there were several small birds that were difficult to classify
(Higgins 1999). Kennerley (1998) describes two
individuals that he identified as saturatus because of
measurements (wing lengths 188 and 186 mm). King
(2005) and Payne (2005) show similar results for
differences in wing length between the two taxa.
There are no known differences in the plumage or
bare parts between saturatus and optatus (King 2005,
Payne 2005) . However, it seems that the amount of yellow
on the lower mandible may be more extensive and the
yellow area more clear-cut in saturatus than in optatus.
This character warrants closer investigation. The bill of
saturatus is of roughly the same size as in optatus,
which means it is proportionally bigger, but it seems
unlikely to be a useful field character. The barring of the
underparts and the underwing patterns appear to overlap
completely. The average number of primary bars and the
extreme values in our material were similar for the two
taxa (see Lindholm and Linden 2003 regarding counting
primary bars).
16
ANTERO LINDHOLM and ANDREAS LINDEN
Forktail 23 (2007)
DISCUSSION
The distribution of the optatus- like, two-note song
continues south to Taiwan, but it seems that the birds
there are not optatus in size. There are three cuckoo skins
from Taiwan in the NHM collection, two of which are
labelled as males and the third is also male-coloured.
They were collected in May (precise date unknown), 28
June and 7 April, and their wing lengths are 195, 184 and
195 mm respectively. Therefore, saturatus is clearly a better
match in size. Payne (2005) also includes some Taiwan
skins in his saturatus material. The situation on the island
clearly needs more study. The higher frequency of song
compared to that of Siberia optatus might reflect the smaller
body size of the birds.
In the mountains of Hebei province there are birds
with song similar to saturatus from the northern Indian
subcontinent and southern China, containing similar
introductory notes, but on average fewer main notes.
Further morphological and bioacoustical studies
covering larger areas are required for a better
understanding of the specific and subspecific status of the
birds in the Hebei province and elsewhere in north-east
China. Further molecular analysis may also be beneficial,
although resolving relationships of saturatus , optatus and
Eurasian Cuckoo C. canorus has not succeeded so far
(Payne 2005).
There seems to be some geographical variation in the
song of saturatus. The previously published specific border
between saturatus and optatus is ambiguous: the Hebei
birds can be classified as saturatus and the Taiwan birds
as optatus but this would only leave the presence or absence
of the introductory note as a character that separates the
two. Alternatively, our material can be interpreted as
showing that at least four distinct song types of Oriental
Cuckoo are found in East Asia. These can be identified
with high certainty, but differences are small (in the
presence or absence of the introductory note and number
and pitch of the main notes). Intermediate populations,
not covered by our material, may bridge these types.
Cuckoos, like most other non-passerines, normally lack
geographical variation in their vocalisations (Baptista and
Kroodsma 2001, Payne 2005). Because no morphological
differences among breeding-season saturatus were
apparent in an examination of museum specimens (Payne
2005), geographical variation among saturatus seems to
be confined to vocalisation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The staff in Natural History Museum, Tring, allowed access to their
collections. Hannu Jannes provided us with one recording of saturatus.
Annika Forsten helped in various ways. Mark Suomala and Magnus
Robb commented on an earlier version of the article.
REFERENCES
Anderson, B. (2005) Taiwan and Hong Kong 19 April-4 May 2005.
Trip report, published on the internet. Downloaded from
www. travellingbirder. com/tripreports/default .php .
Baptista, L. and Kroodsma, D. (2001) Avian bioacoustics. Pp. 1 1-53
in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds
of the world. Volume 6. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Cramp, S., ed. (1985) The birds of the western Palearctic. Volume IV.
Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Higgins, P. J., ed. (1999) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and
Antarctic birds. Volume 4: Parrots to Dollarbird. Melbourne,
Australia: Oxford University Press.
Kennerley, P. (1998) Oriental Cuckoos at Tuas, Singapore on 21st
October and 2nd December 1995. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 27: 55-
57.
King, B. (2005) The taxonomic status of the three subspecies of Cuculus
saturatus. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 125: 48-55.
Lilliefors, H. W. (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smimov test for normality
with mean and variance unknown. J.Am. Stat. Assoc. 64: 399-402.
Lindholm, A. and Linden, A. (2003) Oriental Cuckoo in Finland.
Alula 9: 122-133.
Payne, R. (1997) Family Cuculidae (cuckoos). Pp. 508-607 in J. del
Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the
world. Volume 4. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Payne, R. (2005) The cuckoos. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Thiede, W. and Wallschlager, D. (2000) Vom Waldkuckuck Cuculus
saturatus und seinen Rufen. Omithologische Mitteilungen 52: 13-18.
Wells, D. R. and Becking, J. H. (1975) Vocalizations and status of
Little and Himalayan Cuckoos, Cuculus poliocephalus and C.
saturatus , in Southeast Asia. Ibis 117: 366-371.
Autero Lindholm, Tomihaukantie 2 as 15, FIN-02620 Espoo, Finland. Email: antero.lindholm@elisanet.fi
Andreas Linden, Integrative Ecology Unit, Dept of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.P. Box 65, FIN-00014
University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: andreas.linden@helsinki.fi
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 17-21
Winter roost habitat use by Eurasian Marsh Harriers
Circus aeruginosus in and around Keoladeo
National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India
ASHOK VERMA and VIBHU PRAKASH
Roosts of Eurasian Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus were studied for four winters between 1996 and 2000 in and around Keoladeo
National Park (KNP), eastern Rajasthan, India. Fourteen communal roosts were found, in which harriers gathered in loose aggregations
of 1 1-132 birds. Roosts were situated in tall grasses and wetlands with floating vegetation in KNP, and in tall grasses, sedges, crops and
bare ground in areas adjoining KNP. Birds shifted to roosts in wetlands and peripheral sites when grassland roosts in KNP were disturbed
during the grass-cutting season. A comparison of roost sites with randomly selected non-roost sites in grassland indicated that birds
preferred sites in tall grasses and further from the nearest trees and road.
INTRODUCTION
Studies of ecology and behaviour in both wintering (e.g.
Newton 1979) and breeding grounds (e.g. Doody 1994)
are essential to understand a bird’s complete life cycle
and to formulate effective conservation strategies.
However, for raptors in general, and for harriers in
particular, far fewer studies have been conducted at
wintering grounds than at breeding grounds. This
imbalance is very apparent for the Eurasian Marsh Harrier
Circus aeruginosus (Cramp and Simmons 1980). Here, we
present the first detailed study of Eurasian Marsh Harrier
wintering ecology in India.
The few previous studies of harriers in India consist
mainly of casual observations (Donald 1905, Abdulali 1958,
Navarro 1962, Khacher 1978, Rahmani and Manakadan
1987, Prakash 1988, Rahmani 1988, Satheesan and Rao
1990, Narayan and Rosalind 1991, Vyas 1992, Clarke
1996, Akhtar 1998, and Ganesh and Kanniah 2000).
Verma (2002) studied this species at a roost in Keoladeo
National Park during 1996-2000, counting 48-132
individuals, with numbers peaking in November and
immatures outnumbering adults. Akhtar (1998) studied
a harrier roost at Velavadar National Park, Gujarat, and
found that this species was outnumbered by Montagu’s
Circus pygargus and Pallid Harriers C. macrourus.
In the present study, we aimed to: (1) identify winter
roost habitats of the Eurasian Marsh Harrier within a 25-
km radius of Keoladeo National Park; (2) study roost-site
selection; and (3) investigate disturbance factors.
METHODS
Study site
The study was carried out in August-April each year
during 1996-2000 in Keoladeo National Park (KNP),
eastern Rajasthan, India (27°8-12/N 77°30-34,E; Fig.
1). KNP is located 180 km south of Delhi, at c. 174 m,
and covers c.29 km2. The area lies in the Punjab Plains
biotic province of the semi-arid biogeographical zone
(Rodgers and Panwar 1988), which is a flat, dry area of
the Indus-Yamuna watershed.
Habitat types in KNP include forest, woodland, scrub-
woodland, scattered shrubs, savanna-woodland, shrub-
savanna, grass-savanna and grassland with scattered trees
and shrubs (Perennou and Ramesh 1987). The grasslands
are formed mainly by Vetiveria zizanioides and
Desmostachya bipinnata with trees and shrubs consisting
of Prosopis cineraria, Acacia nilotica , A. leucophloea , Ziziphus
mauritiana and Salvadora persica. The grasslands lie in
the south-east corner of KNP in block G (Fig. 1) and are
about 3 km2 in area.
The central part of KNP is wetland, dominated by the
perennial grass Paspalum distichum. The wetland is fed
partly by rains and partly from a temporary reservoir (Ajan
Dam) situated 0.5 km south of the park (Fig. 1). The
reservoir is usually dry from early October until next
monsoon in June-July, during which time the villagers
use it for cultivation. There are 18 villages around KNP,
which grow ‘bajra’ Pennisetum typhoides, ‘dencha’ (a fodder
crop) Sesbania bispinosa , wheat Triticum aestivum , mustard
Brassica campestris, rice Oryza sativa and pulses.
Summer (March-May) in KNP is characterised by
hot, dry weather, dust storms, low humidity and monthly
rainfall of only a few millimetres. Winter (November-
February) is cold, with chilly winds and fog. Temperatures
during 1 996-2000 ranged from 3.7°C in December 1 996
to 48.5°C in May 1998 (per Meteorological Department,
Bharatpur). KNP receives most of its precipitation from
the south-west monsoon, from the end of June to
September. During the study period the average annual
rainfall was 788 mm.
Data collection
Communal harrier roosts were located by following
harriers at their foraging grounds from an hour before
sunset until they roosted. Radio-telemetry was also used
to locate roosts around KNP. Four harriers (three juveniles
and one adult female) were radio-tagged and tracked
during December 1999-February 2000 using a three-
element, hand-held Yagi antenna with a receiver.
Each week, we counted the number of harriers present
at each communal roost, using binoculars (8x35) and a
telescope (20x) from c. 100-250 m away. At each
communal roost we recorded the habitat, vegetation
composition, mean height of vegetation, area and the
distance from the centre of the roost to the nearest road,
tree and water body. The total roost area was defined as
the area encompassing the locations of all pre-roosting
birds. To examine selection of roosting habitat in
grasslands, we randomly selected a 1 50 x 1 50 m area within
each of five grassland communal roosts, and compared
the characteristics of these areas with those in five randomly
18
ASHOK VERMA and VIBHU PRAKASH
Forktail 23 (2007)
Figure 1. Map of Keoladeo National Park. The shaded portion in the centre indicates wetland areas used by wintering harriers for foraging (and,
occasionally, roosting). Numbers indicate communal harrier roosts and correspond to those listed in Table 1 .
selected non-roost areas measuring 150x150 m. In each
roost and non-roost site, we recorded the average
percentage cover and height of Vetiveria zizanioides and
Desmostachya bipinnata grasses, the distance to the nearest
tree, road and water body, and the number of trees.
Data on individual roost sites within the communal
roost were collected the next morning after the harriers
had left. In total, we studied 525 individual roost sites
(396 in grasslands, 54 in wetlands, 34 in crop fields, 25
in sedge fields and 16 in ploughed fields), which were
identified from the presence of pellets, downy feathers
and excreta. For each roost site, we recorded the vegetation
composition, percentage cover of each plant species,
vegetation height, and the distance to the next nearest
roost site. Means ± SD are presented throughout.
RESULTS
Communal roosts
A total of 1 4 communal harrier roosts were located; eight
in KNP and six in adjoining areas within a radius of 25 km
(Table l,Fig. 1). They were situated in a variety of habitats,
with grasslands being the most frequent (43% of roosts),
followed by wetlands (21%), crop fields (21%), sedge
fields (7%) and ploughed fields (7%). We compared
vegetation parameters for communal roosts in grassland
with randomly selected non-roost sites in grassland. The
only significant difference was that roost sites had a higher
percentage cover of Vetiveria zizanioides , although sample
sizes were low (Table 2). The maximum number of
harriers recorded at grassland communal roosts over the
four years was significantly positively correlated with the
distance to the nearest tree (Table 3).
Individual roost sites
Of 525 individual roost sites studied in various roost
habitats, 57% were located in a mix of Vetiveria zizanioides
and Desmostachya bipinnata grasses, 1 1 % in Desmostachya
bipinnata alone, 7% in Vetiveria zizanioides alone, 8% in
Eichhornia crassipes, and the remainder in Triticum
aestivum, Scirpus tuberosus , Paspalum distichum , Cyperus
alopecuroides, Sesbania or bare ground. For sites in mixed
Vetiveria zizanioides and Desmostachya bipinnata grasses,
the former generally remained standing as protective cover
while the latter was flattened to form the roosting platform.
In grassland roosts, the majority (73%) of roost sites
appeared to be formed by trampling of vegetation by the
harriers themselves, 24% had been previously flattened
by resting ungulates (mostly spotted deer Axis axis and
nilgai Boselaphus tragocamelus) , and 3% were natural
depressions. Individual roost sites averaged
1 . I±0.8x0.7±0.6 m. The mean distance to the next
nearest roost site was 2.4±1.7 m (range 0.5-10.0 m).
Of 54 individual roost sites in wetlands, 74% were
located on water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (an exotic
weed), occasionally interspersed with Paspalum distichum,
Panicum spp. and Pseudoraphis spinescens, in water that
averaged 50±13 cm deep. In sedge fields, tall (1-1.5 m)
stands of Scirpus tuberosus and Desmostachya bipinnata
Forktail 23 (2007) Winter roost habitat use by Eurasian Marsh Harriers in Keoladeo National Park, India 19
Principal vegetation: Vz = Vetiveria zizanioides; Db = Desmostachya bipinnata ; St = Scirpus tuberosus ; Ca = Cypenis alopecuroides ; Es = Echinochloa
sp.; Pd = Paspalum distichum ; Da = Dichanthium annulatum; Ec = Eichhomia crassipes ; Sb = Sesbania bispinosa; Pt — Pennisetum typhoides;
Ta = Triticum aestivum.
Table 2. Comparison of communal roosts in grassland (N=5) with
randomly chosen grassland sites (N=5). P-values are from Wilcoxon
signed ranks tests.
Table 3. Correlations between the maximum number of harriers
recorded at communal roosts in grassland over the four years and various
roost site variables.
20
ASHOK VERMA and VIBHU PRAKASH
Forktail 23 (2007)
typically surrounded roosting platforms, which consisted
of short Echinochloa colona grass interspersed with Ipomoea
aquatica. In pastures, roost sites were on platforms of
Paspalum distichum in depressions among grasses
(. Paspalum distichum , Echinochloa sp., Dichanthium
annulatum and Desmostachya bipinnata ), sedges ( Cyperus
rotundus, Scirpus tuberosus ) and herbs.
Travel and disturbance
Radio-tracking of four harriers showed that they usually
travelled 3-12 km (n= 32 occasions) to reach their roost
sites (Table 4), with a maximum distance of 40 km
recorded for a juvenile in February 2000. The speed with
which they travelled from roosts to foraging grounds was
estimated to be 0.5 km/minute (n = six occasions for four
individuals).
T able 4. Mean distance travelled by harriers from roost sites to foraging
grounds in and around Keoladeo National Park during 1999-2000.
When disturbance from grass-cutting by local people
became severe at grassland roosts (in December 1996,
November 1997, December 1 998 and November 1 999),
harriers shifted to roosts in wetlands, pastures, sedge,
crops and ploughed fields. The adult female with a radio
transmitter was recorded shifting her roost site from Block
G to one in wheat fields at Kaproli village (7 km to the
south-west) on 20 January 2000, apparently in response
to disturbance by grass harvesting. Similarly, birds shifted
from one wetland roost to another when disturbance
occurred by people removing the exotic weed Eichhomia
crassipes (in January 1997, March 1997 and December
1 997), and from wetland roosts to drier roosts when the
former became flooded (in September 1999).
DISCUSSION
Harriers spend considerable time in roost habitats, which
are therefore crucial for their survival. Eurasian Marsh
Harriers in the vicinity of KNP travelled fairly long
distances from their foraging grounds to their roosts,
suggesting that the roost sites provided significant
benefits. Harriers roosted in large, open areas of uniform
habitat, mainly natural grasslands, with Desmostachya
bipinnata and Vetiveria zizanioides. Such grassland
habitat may shelter roosting birds from cold winds
(because of the dense high vegetation) and hence provide
a favourable thermal environment (Cody 1985). Winter
roost sites of American Robin Turdus migratorius have
been shown to have 72% lower average wind velocity
than unsheltered locations (Walsberg and King 1 980) . In
addition, sheltered roosts may provide concealment
from predators (Janes 1985), and predators may find it
difficult to approach roosting harriers silently through
tall grass.
The comparison of grassland roosts and non-roost
sites suggests that Eurasian Marsh Harriers preferentially
roost away from roads and trees. Great Homed Owl Bubo
virginianus has been recorded preying on Hen Harriers
Circus cyaneus at roosts (Weller etal. 1955). At KNP, the
Dusky Eagle Owl Bubo coromandus is a potential predator
of roosting harriers, and we observed antagonistic
interactions on many occasions. Since the Dusky Eagle
Owl is attracted to trees, this might explain the preference
by the harriers for roosts away from trees. Roosting away
from roads may reduce human disturbance and the risk
of predation by terrestrial predators moving along them.
At wetland roosts, harriers selected areas with dry water
hyacinth, which probably helped to camouflage them from
predators in the same way as Short-eared Owls Asio
flammeus select dense, relatively light-coloured grassland
roosts that match their plumage (Craighead and
Craighead 1956).
Hirano et al. (1998) found that Eurasian Marsh
Harriers in Central Japan roosted in patches of sparse
reedbed dominated by short vegetation with a height of
40-60 cm and avoided taller reedbeds. They also preferred
roost sites with undergrowth as night-time air temperature
was significantly higher at such sites than in reedbeds
without undergrowth. Watson and Dickson (1972) found
that Hen Harriers in south-west Scotland roosted on the
ground in the long heather (up to 1 m tall), creating
trampled platforms, 0.5-1 m in diameter, of dead, bent,
grey heather stalks, and noted that the harrier roosts were
concentrated in an area of c. 1 5-20 hectares. At Velavadar
National Park, Gujarat, Akhtar ( 1 998) and Clarke (1996)
found that harriers roosted in grasslands dominated by
Dichanthium sp. grass c. 40-85 cm tall. Gurr (1968)
described roosting habitat of the Australasian Harrier
C. approximans in New Zealand. He found that all roosts
were in swampy locations, along riverbeds, estuaries or
adjacent to tarns in open country and occasionally they
roosted in tall standing pasture crops such as lucerne.
Each roost site was marked by about 0.8 m2 of trampled
vegetation, many white droppings, sometimes one or two
casts, and occasionally white down. Most birds apparently
perched on bent sedges which kept their feet out of the
water, but at some sites the roosting birds’ feet were
probably in the water. Our findings accord with these
previous studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Ministry of Environment, Government of India, for grant support and
sponsorship. BrijendraS. GurjarandRandheeraS. Gurjarare gratefully
acknowledged for their assistance in the field. The Rajasthan Forest
Department kindly provided logistics and permission to carry out
research in KNP. We are especially thankful to Shruti Sharma (KNP,
India), David Ferguson, William S. Clark and Peter Bloom, (U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service) for their help. We also thank J. C. Daniel, A. R.
Rahmani, A. M. BhagwatandN. Chaturvedi (Bombay Natural History
Society) for guidance and encouragement. AV thanks P. R. Sinha and
V. B. Mathur (Wildlife Institute of India) for support while working on
this manuscript. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for useful
comments.
Forktail 23 (2007) Winter roost habitat use by Eurasian Marsh Harriers in Keoladeo National Park, India
21
REFERENCES
Abdulali,H. (1958) Deliberate drowning by a raptorial bird. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 55: 353-354.
Akhtar, S. A. (1998) Wintering ecology of the harriers of Velavadar
National Park, Bhavnagar Dt., Gujarat. Ph.D thesis. University of
Mumbai, Mumbai.
Clarke, R. (1996) Preliminary observations on the importance of a
large communal roost of wintering harriers in Gujarat (NW India)
and comparison with a roost in Senegal (W. Africa). J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 93: 44-50.
Cody, L. M. (1985) An introduction to habitat selection in birds. Pp.
3-56 in M. L. Cody, ed. Habitat selection in birds. New York:
Academic Press.
Craighead, J. J. and Craighead, F. C. (1956) Hawks, owls and wildlife.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: The Stackpole Co.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (1980) Handbook of the birds of
Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the western
Palearctic. Vol. 2. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Donald, C. H. (1905) A congregation of harriers. J. Bombay Nat. Hist.
Soc. 16: 504-505.
Doody, J. S. (1994) Winter roost site use by female American Kestrels
(Falco sparverius) in Louisiana, J. Raptor Res. 28: 9-12.
Ganesh, T. and Kanniah, P. (2000) Roost counts of harriers Circus
spanning seven winters in Andhra Pradesh, India. Forktail 16: 1-
3.
Gurr, L. (1968) Communal roosting behaviour of the Australasian
Harrier Circus approximans in New Zealand. Ibis 110: 332-337.
Hirano, T., Endo, K., Kimijima, M., Kobori, M., Nonaka, J. and
Uchida, H. (1998) Communal roosting of Eastern Marsh Harriers
wintering at Watarase Marsh. Strix 16: 1-15. (In Japanese with
English summary.)
Janes, S. W. (1985) Habitat selection in raptorial birds. Pp. 159-199
in M. L. Cody, ed. Habitat selection in birds. New York: Academic
Press.
Khacher, L. (1978) Migrating harriers. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 74:
355-356.
Navarro, A. (1962) Pale Harrier, Circus macrourus (Gmelin) taking a
Pond Heron Ardeola grayii (Sykes). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 59:
653.
Newton, I. (1979) Population ecology of raptors. Berkhamstead, U.K.:
T. & A. D. Poyser.
Narayan, G. and Rosalind, L. (1991) New record of the Pied Harrier,
Circus melanoleucos (Pennant) breeding in Assam Duars, with a
brief review of its distribution. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 88: 30-34.
Perennou, C. and Ramesh, B. R. (1987) Explanatory notes on the
vegetation map of Keoladeo National Park. Pondichery and Mumbai,
India: French Institute of Pondichery and Bombay Natural History
Society.
Prakash, V. (1988) The general ecology of raptors in Keoladeo National
Park, Bharatpur. Ph.D. thesis. Bombay University, Mumbai, India.
Rahmani, A. R. and Manakadan, R. (1987) A large roost of harriers in
Andhra Pradesh. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 83 (Suppl.): 203.
Rahmani, A. R. ( 1 988) A Pied Harrier, Circus melanoleucos in Northwest
Madhya Pradesh. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 85: 419- 420.
Rodgers, W. A. and Panwar, H. S. (1988) Planning a wildlife protected
area network in India. Volume I: the report. Dehradun, India: Wildlife
Institute of India.
Satheesan, S. M and Rao, P. (1990) Roosting and feeding of harriers
in Secunderbad, Andhra Pradesh, J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 87:
143.
Verma, A. (2002) A large congregation of Eurasian Marsh harriers in
Keoladeo National Park, India. Forktail 18: 150-151.
Vyas, R. (1992) Pied Harrier, Circus melanoleucos (Pennant) in southeast
Rajasthan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 89: 248.
Walsberg, G. E. and King, J. R. (1980) The thermoregulatory
significance of the winter roost-sites selected by Robins in eastern
Washington. Wilson Bull. 92: 33-39.
Watson, A. D. and Dickson, R. C. (1972) Communal roosting of Hen
Harriers in southwest Scotland. Scottish Birds 7: 24-49.
Weller, M. W., Adams Jr, I. C. and Rose, B. J. (1955) Winter roosts of
Marsh Hawks and Short-eared Owls in Central Missouri. Wilson
Bull. 67: 189-193.
Ashok Venn a' and Vibhu Prakash, Bombay Natural History Society, Hombill House, Dr Salim Ali Chowk, Shaheed Bhagat
Singh Road, Mumbai 400 023, India. *Current address: Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box 1 8, Chandrabani, Dehradun
248 001 India. Email: vermaasok@rediffmail.com
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 22-86
Birds of Phongsaly province and the
Nam Ou river, Laos
JEROME FUCHS, ALICE CIBOIS, J. W. DUCKWORTH, ROLAND EVE,
WILLIAM G. ROBICH AUD, TED TIZARD and DIRKVAN GANSBERGHE
Birds were surveyed in Phongsaly province, Laos, during March 1996, September 2003, May 2004, late November-December 2004,
and March 2005, focusing on the rivers of the Phou Dendin National Protected Area (NPA), the proposed Nam Lan conservation area,
the Phou Taleng provincial conservation area, the Phou Fa forest adjacent to Phongsaly town, high-altitude scrub and grass habitats
around the town, and lower-altitude non-forest habitats around Ban Muangyo. During the 1990s, most of the Lao NPAs received a
baseline bird survey but Phou Dendin NPA hosted only short reconnaissances.
Several bird species new for Laos were found, reflecting the survey’s location (far north of the country) and timing (late autumn and
spring migrations). Many other bird species were found for which there are few previous records from Laos. The species of greatest
conservation significance was the globally Near Threatened Lesser Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis : the Nam Ou basin supports one of
the most important populations in South-East Asia. The enigmatic (in Laos) Little Cuckoo Dove Macropygia ruficeps was found for the
first time in over 50 years in the country, and the only known potentially viable population of Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos
in Laos significantly north of Vientiane was documented. Several other bird species of global or national conservation concern were found.
Forest birds in the NPA were only patchily investigated and there may be important populations of them, too. Among specifically hunted
and otherwise harvested species, major declines of hornbills, parakeets and pigeons have occurred, although pheasants and partridges
remain common. Non-forest bird communities were highly imbalanced with the loss, or major decline, of various species such as Cotumix
quails, Streptopelia doves, lapwings, egrets (except on passage). Black-billed Magpie Pica pica , Large-billed Crow, stumids and others.
Range and status are documented for several taxa which recent Lao surveys have not usually identified to form, e.g. 'golden-spectacled
warbler’ Seicercus burkii allies and White Wagtail Motacilla alba races.
INTRODUCTION
Laos is small (236,800 km2) and landlocked with a human
population density lower than in most adjoining countries,
although population growth rate remains high at c. 2 . 37 % .
Although economic development was slow until the 1 990s,
and lagged far behind that of neighbouring countries, this
is now changing. During the five-year period 2001-2005,
the Lao economy sustained rapid expansion, averaging
GDP growth of 6.24% per year (Committee for Planning
and Investment 2006) . This is causing (and partly fuelled
by) an unprecedented pace of change in habitat and the
hunting of commercially valuable species. Laos still retains
extensive, largely natural habitat. Laos has three
biophysical zones, the Mekong plains, the Annamite
mountains, and the northern highlands. The last of these
consists of rugged mountain ranges, highly dissected by
streams, with only small areas of level land.
Phongsaly province (Fig. 1 ), at the country’s northern
tip, typifies the northern highlands. It covers 16,270 km2,
with c. 180,000 people living dispersed across c.600
villages. The province’s hills bear the Nam Ou, the largest
Mekong tributary in Laos; the rivers join near
Louangphabang. Phongsaly and the other northern
highland provinces have sustained high levels of shifting
cultivation for many decades, probably centuries.
Agriculture has particularly affected the small areas of
level land, such that no significant areas of natural habitat
on gentle terrain remain in the province: in particular,
among wetlands and seasonally inundated fringes, all but
the smallest have been heavily modified by people. Much
of the shifting agriculture has been of frontier, rather than
rotational, form, leading to long-term soil
impoverishment, and hence only slow forest regeneration
on abandoned cultivation. Accurate statistics on extent
of cover of different wildlife habitats do not exist for the
province, but in essence, old-growth forest, standing
wetlands, and urban areas are scarce, while secondary
forest, current and abandoned cultivation, and many small
villages predominate.
Laos’s birds remain patchily known. Most historical
records come from 1919-1949, but political changes
meant that for the next four decades very few bird
observations were made (Duckworth and Tizard 2003).
Much survey during the 1990s found a globally highly
significant avifauna, notwithstanding steep declines in
many species (Thewlis etal. 1998, Duckworth etal. 1999,
2002). Historically, Phongsaly was among the better-
collected Lao provinces, but received little attention during
the 1990s wildlife surveys, which mostly concerned
identification and development of a national protected
areas system (Berkmuller etal. 1995a, 1995b, Duckworth
et al. 1999, and references therein). Initial selection of
potential national protected areas (NPAs) prioritised the
largest remaining blocks (>500 km2) of little-degraded
forest (Robichaud el al. 2001). Extensive shifting
cultivation in the northern highlands meant that few NPAs
were proposed there. Phou Dendin is the only NPA in the
four contiguous provinces of Phongsaly, Louangphabang,
Oudomxai and Xiangkhouang (excepting a small part of
the Nam Et-Phou Louey complex; Berkmuller et al.
1 995b) . Phou Dendin was little covered during the 1990s
wildlife surveys, and this left a significant information
gap. Another large knowledge gap, across Laos, concerns
contemporary bird status outside NPAs and their vicinity,
particularly in the northern highlands (Duckworth et al.
2002).
This paper’s primary aim is to report direct field surveys
of Phongsaly’s avifauna in 1996 and 2004-2005, in the
context of past records from the province and
contemporary information from the rest of Laos. Hill
forest birds were de-emphasised (see below), with greater
focus on riverine (including the Nam Ou downstream of
Phongsaly province), wetland and open-country species.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
23
Figure 1. Laos, showing selected survey localities. 1, Ban Bakong; 2, Ban Bomang; 3, Ban Boun-Nua; 4, Ban Boun-Tai; 5, Ban Chicho; 6, Ban
Dua; 7, Ban Hathin; 8, Ban Hatxa; 9, Ban Houaylek; 10, Ban Houaytou; 1 1, Ban Khomen; 12, Ban Khounsouk-Noy; 13, Ban Lak 69; 14, Ban
Laophouchai; 15, Ban Long Nay Mai; 16, Ban Mai; 17, Ban Muangyo; 1 8, Ban Namaek; 19, Ban Naten; 20, Ban Siengnua; 21, Ban Sopkhang;
22, Ban Soppha; 23, Ban Tan; 24, Ban Tatoung; 25, Houay Khanionho mouth; 26, Houay Yoong temple ruin; 27, Ivhoa; 28, Phongsaly; 29,
Phou Dendin; 30, Phou Namla camp; 31, Phou Taleng.
Most fieldwork targeted species of global or national
conservation concern, and/or those poorly known in Lao,
although JF and AC primarily sought bird tissue samples
for phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies. No site in
Laos’s northern highlands has had intensive bird survey
in both non-breeding and breeding seasons since David-
Beaulieu’s (1944, 1948) landmark studies in
Xiangkhouang, and indeed seasonal differences in
avifauna remain poorly clarified in Laos, so the 2004-
2005 survey covered mid-winter and the early breeding
season at the same sites.
Square brackets indicate provisional identifications.
Sequence, species limits and nomenclature follow Inskipp
era/. (1996), with deviations explicitly noted. Scientific
names are given in the text only for species not in Appendix
1. Lao national conservation status is taken from
Duckworth era/. (1999), global assessments from BirdLife
International (2004). Division ofLaos into North, Centre
and South follows Duckworth era/. (1999). Place names
(see Appendix 2 for locators and altitude) are based on
the 1985-1987 series of 1:100,000 maps ofthe RDP Lao
Service Geographique d’Etat (RDPL SGE) maps with the
minor modifications ofThewlis era/. (1998), except that:
(1) Nakai Plateau and derivatives are spelt thus, not as
Nakay; (2) Phongsaly and Phou Fa are used rather than
Phongsali and Phou Pha; (3) current villagers’ usage
replaces map names where the latter are unrecognisable
(Appendix 2). These modifications reflect widespread
current usage, not necessarily the ‘correct’ spellings.
Coordinates and altitudes, except where stated, are
derived from the RDPL SGE maps. Unqualified
November and December dates refer to 2004. This
document replaces internal reports to the EU ‘Phongsaly
Forest Conservation and Rural Development Project’.
Many identifications are refined, confirmed or deleted:
in all discrepancies, the present paper is definitive.
The following non-standard abbreviations are used,
in addition to authors’ initials: EU, European Union; E-
W Nam Ou, the uninhabited stretch of the Nam Ou that
flows west to east, before the inflow of the Nam Khang;
FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago,
U.S. A.; MHNG, Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva;
MNHN, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris;
NHM, Natural History Museum, Tring, U.K.; Nam Lan
CA, Nam Lan Conservation Area; NPA, National
Protected Area; RDPL SGE, Lao PDR State Geographic
Service (map series).
PREVIOUS BIRD SURVEYS IN PRONGSALY
PROVINCE AND THE NAM OU
The Kelley-Roosevelts’ expedition collected birds and
mammals in Phongsaly province over 19 April-5 June
1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1930, 1931, Osgood 1932).
It stopped at Ban Laophouchai (20-22 April), Phongsaly
town (23 April-7 May, mainly around the village of ‘Ban
Makomen’, presumed to be modern Ban Khomen), Ban
Muangyo (8-21 May) and Ban Boun-Tai (21 May-
2 June) with visits to nearby villages such as ‘Long Nai’
(presumed to be modern Ban Long Nay Kao; ‘kao’ often
means ‘old7‘former’/‘original’, whereas ‘mai’ means
‘new’) on 27 May. It also passed ‘Pyn Ho’ (presumed to
lie in the Nam Paho headwaters) on 1 9 April, Ban Hatxa
on 22-23 April, Ban Boun-Nua on 7 May, ‘Kouei Soung’
(somewhere in southern Phou Taleng) on 2 June, Ban
24
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Mongchao-Noy on 3 June, Phongsaly (again) on 4 June
and Ban Hatxa (again) on 5 June, before departing by the
Nam Ou (6-9 June) to the Mekong as far as Savannakhet.
The expedition also collected at ‘Phu Den Dinh’ but this
was east of the Mekong watershed (Coolidge and
Roosevelt 1933: 106-107), hence in Vietnam. It made
few records of river birds: Coolidge and Roosevelt (1933:
179) discussed the difficulties in collecting birds in swirling
rivers. Few field sightings accompany the specimen list of
Bangs and Van Tyne (1931), hampering detection of
status changes since 1 929. Most of the expedition’s birds
are held at FMNH, but a few were donated to MNHN
(Table 1). Re-examination of the expedition’s niltavas
(Dickinson 1973) and bush warblers Cettia and
Bradypterus (e.g. Dickinson et al. 2000) amended
identifications in Bangs and Van Tyne (1931), and a few
other identifications have been amended, according to
the FMNH web-site listing. The haul of Collocalia, Oriolus ,
Coracitia, Cyornis, Zosterops, Phylloscopus, Seicercus and
small Stachyris probably merit a fresh critical look. An
even earlier expedition may have collected birds in the
province: localities of mammal specimens (in Osgood
1932) show that F. R. Wulsin visited Phongsaly in 1924,
but his bird collection has never been written up.
Over 2 1-28 November 1931, the Legendre Indochina
Expedition collected a few birds in the province, from
Ban Sopnao (up the Nam Noua) thence to the non-located
sites of Ban Hatkham, Kang Pha Ha and Vang Pha Ho
(Dickinson 1970a). ‘Hat’ (= beach), ‘Pha’ (- cliff or
precipice), and ‘Kang’ (for keng, = rapids) suggest these
were sites on the Nam Noua or Nam Ou amid rugged
terrain in either Phongsaly or Louangphabang provinces,
upstream of Ban Muangngoy, their next site.
Sixty years later, a reconnaissance for protected area
planning visited Phou Dendm Proposed Protected Area
during 5-12 March 1992. The unpublished trip report
(Salter 1992) cannot now be located but (from memory)
contained numerous bird records. A short bird survey
during 23 May-3 June 1995 was mostly in Phou Dendin
NPA with supplementary records from Phou Fa and the
Nam Ou (Duckworth et al. 1998a). (The bird list in
Robichaud and Sounthala [1995] was greatly revised
following review of field notes and tapes.) Thewlis et al.
(1998) detailed all 1992, 1995 and 1996 (see below)
records of then key species (species of elevated national
conservation concern). Rufous-throated Partridge, Bar-
backed Partridge, Silver Pheasant, Grey Peacock Pheasant,
Crested Kingfisher, Green Cochoa, Hill Myna, Rufous¬
faced Warbler, Rufous-throated Fulvetta, Whiskered
Yuhina and Spot-breasted Parrotbill were dropped from
the revised list of key species (Duckworth et al. 1999) and
so are not discussed here (but are listed in Appendix 1).
SURVEY SITES
Selection of survey areas
The 1996 visit was part of a nationwide effort to
characterise avifauna of the NPA system. Phou Dendin
NPA was hence the focus, with survey sites selected to
cover the lowest river valleys to the highest peaks. Records
from September 2003 came incidentally during
professional duties. Sites in May 2004 were chosen to
maximise blood sampling opportunities. In November-
December 2004, sites were selected to optimise reduction
in information gaps for today’s Lao avifauna and
conservation needs. The extensive forest-fringed mid-to-
wide rivers in Phou Dendin NPA were a high survey
priority because most such areas are heavily settled and
farmed, and hunting and other harvesting is particularly
damaging in them. As two-dimensional habitats, total
populations of specialist birds may be low, and
opportunities to evade people are limited: rivers are the
main transport routes in much of Laos, and their open
habitat allows easy shooting. Also, stock (bovids and,
increasingly, ducks) and their human and canine
attendants make heavy use of rivers, living off the land.
The few NPAs which contain or adjoin extensive habitat
of this type (Nakai-Nam Theun and adjacent parts of the
Nakai Plateau, Xe Pian, Nam Kading and Dong Ampham)
all support many threatened birds (Davidson et al. 1 997,
Thewlis et al. 1998).
Large areas of mid-altitude grassland are mapped in
Phou Dendin NPA, suspected by C. J. Hatten (verbally
2004) to be of ancient origin. (Semi-) natural grasslands
barely feature in the NPA system, but have probably
contracted greatly in Laos. Limited surveys so far (mainly
in Xiangkhouang province) indicate major declines in
specialist birds (Duckworth et al. 2002). Thus,
investigating Phou Dendin NPA’s interior grasslands was
intended, but was cancelled through injury. Assessment
of hill forest birds in November-December was not a
priority: forest bird survey depends heavily on
vocalisations, but few species call regularly at this time
and even fewer respond to tape-playback. Moreover,
evergreen forests in the altitude range of Phou Dendin
NPA are well represented in Nam Ha, Nam Et, Phou
Loeuy and Nam Xam NPAs in the northern highlands,
Table 1. Kelley- Roosevelt bird specimens from Phongsaly province donated to MNHN by FMNH.
Two further specimens, Alcippe morrisonia fratercula MNHN CG 1 930-169 and Zosterops palpebrosus MNHN CG 1930-176, cannot curently be
found in the collections of the MNHN; it is unclear whether they came from the Lao or Vietnamese sections of the expedition.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
25
all of which have had baseline bird surveys (Tizard et al.
1997, Showier etal. 1998b, Davidson 1998, 1999). Each
NPA supports important forest bird populations, so Phou
Dendin warrants a comparable survey; but in April-May
(-June) when birds are breeding and are much more
conspicuous. The injury in December meant time was
reassigned to several easily accessible areas:
• high-altitude habitats around Phongsaly town, where
the most novelties might be expected;
• provincial-level protected forests of Phou Fa and Phou
Taleng, where indication of forest bird communities
could be gained; and
• valley bottoms around Ban Muangyo, where the
Kelley-Roosevelts’ expedition (Bangs and Van Tyne
1931) found several presumed resident non-forest
species not recorded in Laos during the 1 990s surveys,
and hence high priorities for further information
(Duckworth et al. 1999).
In March 2005, the primary aims were to visit these
same easily accessible areas to evaluate the extent of
seasonal change, and to revisit the highest altitudes of
Phou Dendin NPA, identified in December as supporting
bird species rather different from the mid-altitude forests.
Phou Dendin National Protected Area
(18-28 March 1996, 30 November-1 3 December 2004,
13-27 March 2005)
This protected area covers at least 1,310 km2 (Robichaud
et al. 2001), substantially more (semi-) natural habitat
than any other survey area. It consists mostly of rugged
terrain, with 60% lying above 1,000 m and all over 500 m
(Berkmuller et al. 1995b), lacks roads and has only one
large human settlement (Ban Hathin complex). Only six
other villages, all small, are known in the NPA. Particularly
upstream of the Nam Khang’s inflow, there are large tracts
of (semi-) evergreen forest. Abandoned villages and fields
are widespread and the former rest-house of (Sala) Pyn
Ho, in the centre-east of the NPA (see Bangs and Van
Tyne 1931), suggests that a well-used trail formerly
traversed the NPA to Vietnam. Today’s slash-and-burn
gives a mosaic of forest from early regrowth to mature,
mixed with shrubland and grass. Grassland burning is
reportedly widespread but not universal, with areas not
good for grazing unlikely to be fired. The Nam Ou flows
fast; its bed has many rock outcrops and some seasonally
submerged bushlands. The many sediment bars are
extensively silty, and small. There are no long and wide
areas of seasonally exposed channel bed. The Nam Ou is
quite turbid (visibility <0.5 m in December), reportedly
due to a muddy tributary locally called the ‘red river’ . The
Nam Khang, its major tributary, is much clearer.
Informants from Ban Sopkhang said that the water in
the E-W Nam Ou at the time of the survey was flowing
c. 1 m lower than formerly at that season. In the NPA, the
Nam Ou is navigable, but this is hard work and the effort
required limits the numbers of people using that stretch of
the river. Abandoned village sites and sediment bars serve
as night stops for hunters and collectors. Shooting is
widespread, but levels of snaring and trapping are unclear.
No roads enter the NPA, no doubt the most significant
factor in retaining its habitat and wildlife.
In 1996, TT boated up the Nam Ou from Ban Hatxa
on 1 8-1 9 March, walked from Ban Hathin to Ban T an on
20 March, spent 21-23 March in high-altitude forest
between the village and the Vietnamese border, walked
on 24 March from Ban Tan to Ban Tatoung, then to Ban
Sopkhang on 25 March and back to Ban Hathin that
evening. He surveyed around Ban Hathin on 26 March.
On 27 March he boated up the Nam Ou to the Houav
Yoong temple ruin and back, in continuous rain. Driving
rain continued to inhibit surveying on 28 March when he
boated back from Ban Hathin to Ban Hatxa.
In 2004, the Nam Ou (upstream to 2 km west of the
mouth of the Houay Khanionho), the lower Nam Khang,
and adjacent forest was covered intensively by JWD and
WGR, making much use of boats, during 1-7 December.
WGR then made a three-day trip further up the Nam
Khang to beyond Ban Soppha, and a three-day walk
beyond Ban Tan to the same high-altitude border area as
in March 1996, leaving the NPA on 13 December. Over
1 1-1 3 December, JWD used the Nam Houn to enter the
degraded lower-altitude habitats around the NPA’s south¬
western margin near Ban Siengnua.
In 2005, there were only ‘in transit’ observations along
the Nam Ou, no visit to the least-disturbed area (the ‘E-
W Nam Ou’) . Instead, the focus, by RE over 12-19 March,
was a third visit to the Ban Tan-Vietnam border, for five
days. WGR made a five-day (21-25 March) walk to Ban
Laophouchai, then via the upper Nam Va to Ban Mai and
back to Ban Hatxa, at great pace to overview habitats and
interview villagers about mammals. Only incidental
records of birds were generated. AC and JF visited the
villages of Ban Hathin (18-20 March 2005, 25-26 March
2005), and Ban Sopkhang (21-24 March 2005). Most of
their time was devoted to mist-netting, all within 0.5-1
km of these villages.
Phou Fa
(15-17 March 1996, 14 September 2003, 22-24 May,
27-29 November, 10, 15, 26 December 2004, 12, 14-
17, 19, 27-28 March 2005)
Phou Fa retains c.200 ha of hill evergreen forest almost
within Phongsaly town, spread over 1,480-1,625 m.
Although rather degraded, notably by a hairpin¬
bending road to the summit, many large trees remain.
The variety, from ruderals through to advanced
secondary forest, offers diverse habitat for forest birds. It
is linked by secondary scrub, in places with many maturing
trees, to more extensive secondary forests. Phou Fa is a
provincial protected forest under active development as a
public cultural recreation area (Phongsaly Provincial
Agriculture and Forestry Office verbally 2004) . Many day-
trippers visit. Bamboo and various other forest products
are heavily collected, and catapult-toting children roam
its margins. Most observations took place from the road
and foot trail, with lengthy stops at viewpoints (overlooking
the canopy, fruiting trees and down a landslide), starting
at dawn and usually finishing by noon.
Open habitats around Phongsaly town
(intermittently, 27 November-23 December 2004 and
1 1-24 March 2005)
Phongsaly town is surrounded by vast areas of coarse
mixed scrub and ruderals, interspersed with current and
fallow fields, tea gardens, tall grass and small wooded
coombes. Three trails were walked: northwards towards
Ban Khounsouk-Noy (27,29 November, 8,14 December,
1 1, 1 5, 18 March); southwards towards Ban Bakong (17,
18, 23 December, 13, 19, 24 March); and (branching
from the former) eastwards towards Ban Khomen and
26
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Ban Phagnexi (19 December). The Khounsouk trail ran
below the Phou Fa forest and had many small wooded
streams and annual crop fields, at varying stages of growth,
harvest and abandonment, and little tea. There were many
excellent vantage points into the scrub and ruderals. The
Bakong trail ran through the only extensive area with
grass a co-dominant (several km2) and had few copses or
streams. Viewing was difficult away from roadside, buffalo-
trail and poached (through grazing) areas. The Khomen
trail was dominated by dense scrub with more varied
habitats a few km beyond Ban Khomen. The tea gardens
here were almost bereft of birds, as observed elsewhere
(e.g. the Western Ghats, India; T. R. Shankar Raman
and D. Mudappa verbally 2002), so no significant time
was spent in them. Scrub and ruderal- and grass-
dominated areas probably arose as past cultivation reduced
fertility. The wooded coombes enhance bird diversity in
the ‘scrub’ and in maintaining ‘forest’ corridors to Phou
Fa. Ban Khomen probably equates to ‘Ban
Makomen... about 5 km south-southeast of Phong Saly’
(Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), whence most ‘Phongsaly’
Kelley- Roosevelts’ bird specimens originated; their species
composition shows that the area was predominantly non¬
forest even then. Coolidge and Roosevelt’s (1933)
statement that Ban Makomen was 1 5 km from Phongsaly
was presumably in error.
Phongsaly toivn
(intermittently 15-17 March 1996, September 2003,
May, November-December 2004, March 2005)
Many walks, mainly between the Phou Fa Hotel, the EU
project compound and the market, at various times of
day, helped establish which species were truly urban in
Phongsaly town. At several dusks and dawns, the town’s
two tall red-and-white metal towers (by the post office
and by a military base) were checked; elsewhere in Laos
and Thailand these sites attract roosting sturnids, raptors
and sometimes other birds, presumably because shooting
is absolutely prevented. A secondary aim of walking round
town was to investigate the cage birds being kept and the
extent of wildlife trading in the markets.
Phou Taleng
(9, 16, 21, 22 December 2004, 14, 17, 20, 21 March
2005)
The Phou Taleng forest, straddling the Phongsaly town-
Ban Boun-Nua road, officially covers 92.71 km2,
according to a roadside signboard. As presented by the
same signboard, shooting, tree-felling and fires are
prohibited. Contiguous forest, much old-growth,
probably covers several hundred km2 of rugged hills. Its
several villages on 1985-1987 RDPL SGE maps are
abandoned, including Ban Mongchau-Noy of Bangs and
Van Tyne (1931). The road along the whole distance
between Ban Chicho and Ban Houaylek now has only a
small police post. The village sites now support scrub.
Forest altitude ranges from 900 m (or lower) to 1 ,684 m,
but the area above 1,500 m is small. Unusually in Laos,
forest with near-natural structure flanks a main road for
c. 1 0-1 5 km. The road peaks at c. 1 ,400 m, at the watershed
signifying the Phongsaly-Boun-Nua district boundary at
21°37'N 101°57'E. Observations and signs indicated
heavy forest product collection: distance to villages may
limit volumes of low-value items removed. Observations
were made from the road and a well-used forest trail,
somewhat below the main ridge, running south-westward
from the district boundary sign.
Ban Muangyo area
(24-25 December 2004, 22-23 March 2005)
Historically, Ban Muangyo provided several non-forest
birds with few Lao records, notably Black-headed Munia
and Asian Pied Starling. Ban Muangyo stands out on
topographic maps for its flat river valley, larger (c. 1 km2)
than typical in Phongsaly province, which struck Coolidge
and Roosevelt (1933) as ‘an interesting variety of country
to study’. Ban Boun-Nua and Ban Boun-Tai both have
even larger flat areas, but lack a good historical bird
baseline. Ban Muangyo’s bottom is dominated by paddies
(some wet, mostly dry; some replanted, but mostly
stubbles during both visits) with small vegetable gardens;
no natural plains vegetation persists. They differ from
most other paddy land seen in Lao hill areas, e.g. Ban
Boun-Nua, because the rivers are barely incised, even in
the late dry season, and so are flanked with wet grass (all
grazed short) amid gravel and mud shoals. Steep hills rise
from the small floodplain.
Two streams were walked: the Nam Hoy to Ban
Bomang (24 December, 22 March) and the Nam Tou
from Ban Dua to Ban Houaytou (25 December, 23
March). Several roads were driven to seek other good
habitat: along a headwater of the Nam Tou to Ban Lak
69; along the Nam Hoy to Ban Namhoy; several miles
along the main road from Ban Muangyo towards Ban
Boun-Tai; and the entire distance from Ban Muangyo to
Ban Boun-Nua. Observations focussed on: streamside
grass; weedy stubble; tall stubble; wet stubble; narrow
paddy ditches; riverside gravel and grass; vegetable
gardens; buffalo wallows and animals (many sturnids
forage near bovids); and mud. Necessarily, much of the
predominant land — short, dry, relatively non-weedy
stubbles — was walked in transit. Adjacent slope forest
was covered only through calls heard.
Human use along the roads and in parts of the rivers
was very heavy, but many fields were disturbed only once
or twice a day, by a buffalo-herder in transit.
Nam Lan Conservation Area and its vicinity
(6-22 and 25-31 May 2004, 4-14 March 2005)
The Nam Lan Conservation Area (c.100 km2), in Boun-
Tai district, is bordered by China on the west, the Nam
Lan on the north and the Nam Ngeun on the south. It lies
at 600-1,100 m, mostly below 800 m. Rice fields and
bamboo stands on the non-protected side of the N am Lan
contrast with old secondary forest and bamboo on the
protected side. Few paths enter Nam Lan CA, even near
villages, because slopes are so steep. The nine villages
within or close to Nam Lan CA mostly lie near the Nam
Lan or Nam Ngeun. Ban Naten (8-13 May and 26-27
May 2004, 9-1 1 March 2005), Ban Long Nay Mai (15-
2 1 May 2004, 5-8 March 2005) and Ban Namaek (28-3 1
May 2004) all served as mist-netting bases, with two other
sites surveyed near Ban Naten, each c. 1 hr walk away: the
‘hot springs’ (21°19'43"N 101o53'13"E) and the ‘bat caves’
(21°20'09"N 101°50'31"E). All observations were from
altitudes of 650-750 m.
Nam Ou from Louangphabang to Ban Hatxa
(14, 20 March (partial), 30 March- 1 April 1996, 25-26
November 2004)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
27
Most breeding birds typical of large river channels have
declined in Laos, some to national extinction (Thewlis et
al. 1998, Duckworth etal. 1998b, 1 999, 2002), so a slow
boat was taken along the Nam Ou between
Louangphabang and Ban Hatxa in both 1996 (a three-
day journey) and 2004 (two days). The river is heavily
settled, and even those parts with the fewest and/or smallest
settlements support heavy subsistence activity and passage
by cargo/public transport boats. Even by 1929, this area
was ‘cut-over forest [with] numerous villages’ (Coolidge
and Roosevelt 1933), and most bank-side habitat remains
heavily degraded scrub and ruderals, except for some
good karst forest in several stretches. Boats were started
shortly after dawn and continued through the day with
frequent stops in 1996 but only short stops in 2004.
Incidental observations elsewhere
During 22-29 March 1 996, WGR visited the unprotected
area between Ban Boun-Nua and Ban Ngay-Tai, partly
by vehicle but with most time spent on foot along the Nam
Ngay between Ban Ngay-Neua and Ban Ngay-Tai.
Observation was hindered by frequent rain, a tight schedule
(on one day there was not even time to pause to make
notes), and long periods off any trail. Observations were
made in various sites in and around Phongsaly town and
Ban Boun-Tai during 13-16 September 2003; around
Ban Boun-Nua on 1 6, 23, 25 December 2004 and 2 1-22
March 2005; in the Phongsaly water supply forest, around
the Nam Fan river (c.800 m) on 20 December 2004; in
Ban Boun-T ai in both May 2004 and March 2005; and on
car journeys between sites, including departure trips to
Ban Boun-Nua, Oudomxai and Louangphabang airports.
METHODS
Except for N am Lan C A, each site was covered by intensive
all-day standard field birding, starting from dawn. Some
spotlighting (for mammals) on Phou Fa and in Phou
DendinNPA, substantially pre-first-light starts (in March
2004), and listening from tents in Phou Dendin NPA (in
December) gave information on night birds . JWD carried
tape-playback equipment but luring was little use in
December (non-breeding season) although somewhat
effective in March. Many observations were made from
motor boats along the Nam Ou, Nam Khang and Nam
Houn. Paddled, silent, boats were much used in December
in Phou Dendin NPA. WGR’s extensive village interviews
mainly discussed large mammals, but also crows and,
sometimes, pheasants and hornbills. JWD’s tapes were
kindly reviewed by C. R. Robson to check identifications
and for overlooked species. AC and JF mist-netted in
Nam Lan CA (May 2004 and March 2005), Phou Fa
(May 2004 and March 2005) and Phou Dendin NPA
(March 2005) . Up to fifteen 6- 1 2 m mist-nets were placed
in various locations, i.e., near fruiting trees, near streams,
at natural breaks in the vegetation and along ridge-tops,
in order to maximise the number of species trapped.
BIRDS RECORDED
All species ever recorded from Phongsaly province are
listed in Appendix 1 . Over 30 species found in 1 929 were
not confirmed during 1996-2005 (Table 2). Conversely,
the 1996-2005 surveys yielded many species not found
historically in the province, including seven species new
to Laos, highlighting the inadequacy of the current
information base. Captive birds are listed in Table 3; all
except Grey-headed Parakeet were also found in the field.
Specimens, deposited in MNHN and MHNG, are
indicated in Table 4. About 80 bird species not recorded
from Laos were mapped as present in Phongsaly province
by MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000). This reflected
carelessness, not access to new data (Duckworth 2000),
so the records are not discussed here, reflecting the policy
on these same authors’ anomalous Hong Kong records
(Carey et al. 2001).
Comparing seasons and, especially, sites needs caution
because surveyors’ experience and precise routes varied.
Notably, coverage of Phou DendinNPA was very different
between March 1996, December, and March 2005 (see
above). Because no observer had spent significant field
time in northern Indochinese highland forests for some
years, identification skills evolved during the survey: all
site lists surely underestimate significantly the actual birds
present.
T ext accounts are given only for species in the following
categories:
• key species of special national conservation concern
as listed in Duckworth et al. (1999), with additional
non-forest species identified by Duckworth etal. (2002)
as having apparently declined in North Laos. BirdLife
International’s (2004) amended global assessments
add an additional species (Yellow-breasted Bunting)
as being of special concern in Laos.
• records which extend a species’s known range, e.g.
new for Laos or North Laos, or first post- 1 9 5 0 records;
in addition, the first Lao records of Grey-backed
Thrush, White-cheeked Starling, Rosy Pipit and
Japanese Grosbeak are covered in Duckworth (2006) .
• species where the records clarify seasonality of
occurrence in Laos.
• species found at unexpectedly low or high altitudes.
• species lacking a recent review of Lao conservation
status, where our records suggest one is warranted.
• subspecies readily identifiable in the field, yet most or
all recent records were published only at species level.
• species not found for which survey effort is sufficient
to infer genuine scarcity or even absence.
Scaly-breasted Partridge A rborophila charltonii
(. Selected records only ) Phou Dendin NPA: many heard
around Ban Tan (c.960 m) in March 2005, confirmed to
species by a villager’s lure bird; heard up to at least 1 ,450
m around Phou Namla.
Elsewhere in Laos, Scaly-breasted Partridge occurs
below c.800 m, exceptionally to 1,170m (e.g. Evans and
Timmins 1998, Duckworth et al. 1999), and a record
from northern Thailand at 1,350 m was regarded as
exceptional by Deignan (1945). Atypically high-altitude
records are particularly surprising in the climatically
harsher north of the range. It was not found at other high-
altitude sites: at Phou Taleng (mainly 1,100-1,500 m),
Bar-backed Partridge (the common congener in Lao mid¬
altitude hills: Thewlis etal. 1998, Duckworth etal. 1999)
was common, with a single Scaly-breasted Partridge heard
far below. Around Ban Muangyo (700-800 m) and in the
small, degraded, fragments around Phongsaly town (800-
1,440 m) only Bar-backed Partridge was heard. The
28
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Potential contributory factor to lack of recent records:
(1) Absence of records does not imply the species has decreased locally
Identification difficulties: potentially present but overlooked through identification difficulties.
Passage migrant and/or breeding visitor: likely to be solely or overwhelmingly a passage migrant through the survey area , and recent surveys may not have
overlapped passage timing, and/or a breeding visitor, and not to arrive until April or May.
Forest species: requires significant time in forest and/or skills (e.g. knowledge of vocalisations) to find reliably.
Restricted ecologically: likely to be very restricted, ecologically, within the surveyed areas ; hence may well have been overlooked.
Difficult to find: given the methodology used at likely times and places, so may simply have been overlooked.
(2) Absence of records appears to reflect genuine decline in the species, at least locally
Large-bodied bird of open country, i.e. exposed to high levels of persecution
Habitat loss: at sufficient levels to have led to local extinction.
(3) No obvious reason for lack of recent records
No obvious reason: species does not really fulfil any of previous criteria
National comparisons
Declined nationally: known to have declined nationally or at least in North Laos (Duckworth et al. 1999, 2002).
species was not noted in high-altitude Phou Dendin NPA
in 1995 (Duckworth et al. 1998a) or 1996 (Appendix 1),
and there is no relevant information from the Kelley-
Roosevelts’ expedition.
Mountain Bamboo Partridge Bambusicola fytchii
Phou Dendin NPA: two caged birds, reportedly from
nearby hills, Ban T atoung, 6 December; four captives, Ban
Laophouchai, March 2005. Around Phongsaly town: a
caged pair, 15 March 1996. Bakong trail, group of four, 17
December, and three groups counter-calling, 13 and 19
March 2005 . Group of eight, Ban Phagnexi, 1 9 December.
Single groups, Khounsouk trail, 1 1 and 18 March 2005.
Other: two captives, Ban Boun-Nua, March 1996.
This species was found near Phongsaly town (FMNH
77540) and around Ban Muangyo (FMNH 77541) in
1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 193 1 ), but its current national
conservation status has been unclear. Galliforms are often
assumed to be at elevated risk of extinction through being
favoured quarry (e.g. McGowan 2002). This is not so for
forest species in Laos, but some of open-country have
declined steeply (Thewlis et al. 1998, Duckworth et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
29
Bar-backed Partridge Arborophila brunneopectus
Scaly-breasted Partridge Arborophila charltonii
Mountain Bamboo Partridge Bambusicola fytchii
Red JUNGLEFOWL Callus gallus
Silver Pheasant Lophura nycthemera
Grey-headed Parakeet Psittacula finschii
Oriental Turtle Dove Streptopelia orientalis
Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis
Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela
Mountain Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nipalensis
WHITE-VENTED Myna Acridotheres cinereus
Hill Myna Gracula religiosa
Red-whiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus
Black-throated Laughingthrush Garrulax chinensis
Black-headed Sibia Heterophasia melanoleuca
Ban Soppha, one; Ban Tatoung, one; Ban Tan, three;
Ban Naten, one*, Phongsaly, one*
Ban Tan, one (still present*)
Ban Tatoung, two; Ban Laophouchai*, four
Ban Laophouchai*, one
Naten*, Phongsaly*
Ban Laophouchai*, two
Khoa, two; Phongsaly, two
Phongsaly, one*
Phongsaly, one f*
Phongsaly, one
Ban Boun-Nua, one (still present*)
Khoa, one; Ban Muangyo, six, one*
Phongsaly, three f
Phongsaly, four (one*); Ban Boun-Tai, one
Phongsaly, one f
The partridges and junglefowl were ‘lure birds’; the other species were ‘pets’.
All records were from November-December 2004 except * March 2005, f May 2004.
Table 4. Specimens collected from Phongsaly province, 2004-2005.
Species
Locality
Date Catalogue number
White-browed Piculet Sasia ochracea
LESSER SHORTWING Brachypteryx leucophrys
Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis
Hill Blue Flycatcher Gyomis banyumas
Hill Blue Flycatcher Cyomis banyumas
Hill Blue Flycatcher Cyomis banyumas
Hill Blue Flycatcher Cyomis banyumas
Blue flycatcher sp. Cyomis sp.
Blue flycatcher sp. Cyomis sp.
Brown-breasted Flycatcher Muscicapa muttui
Barn Swallow Hinmdo rustica
Blyth’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus reguloides
Blyth’S Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus reguloides
Blyth’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus reguloides
Martens’s Warbler Seicercus omeiensis
MARTENS’S Warbler Seicercus omeiensis
Bianchi’S Warbler Seicercus valentini
Puff-throated Babbler Pellomeum ruficeps
Buff-breasted Babbler Pellomeum tickelli
Buff-breasted Babbler Pellomeum tickelli
Buff-breasted Babbler Pellomeum tickelli
Buff-breasted Babbler Pellomeum tickelli
Grey-throated Babbler Stachyris nigriceps
Grey-throated Babbler Stachyris nigriceps
Spot-necked Babbler Stachyris striolata
PURPLE-NAPED SUNBIRD Hypogramma hypogrammicum
Ban Hathin, PDD
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Hathin, PDD
Ban Hathin, PDD
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Hathin, PDD
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Hathin, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Long Nay Mai, NLCA
Ban Naten, Nam Lan CA
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
Ban Sopkhang, PDD
19 March 2005
6 March 2005
19 March 2005
19 March 2005
5 March 2005
5 March 2005
24 March 2005
24 March 2005
24 March 2005
23 March 2005
5 March 2005
20 March 2005
7 March 2005
6 March 2005
6 March 2005
23 March 2005
19 March 2005
21 March 2005
6 March 2005
6 March 2005
6 March 2005
7 March 2005
10 March 2005
24 March 2005
24 March 2005
24 March 2005
MNHN CG 2005-2676 (JF172)
MHNG 1922.077 (JF115)
MHNG 1933.014 (JF170)
MNHN CG 2005-2670 (JF171)
MNHN CG 2005-2672 (JF99)
MNHN CG 2005-2671 (JF103)
MNHN CG 2005-2667 (JF221)
MNHN CG 2005-2668 (JF219)
MNHN CG 2005-2669 (JF220)
MHNG 1933.015 (JF205)
MHNG 1922.073 (JF98)
MNHN CG 2005-2675 (JF179)
MNHN CG 2005-2674 (JF126)
MNHN CG 2005-2673 (JF1 17)
MHNG 1922.078 (JF1 18)
MNHN CG 2005-2677 (JF210)
MNHN CG 2005-2678 (JF169)
MNHN CG 2005-2679 (JF188)
MNHN CG 2005-2680 (JF106)
MHNG 1922.074 (JF107)
MHNG 1922.075 (JF116)
MHNG 1922.076 (JF135)
MHNG 1922.079 (JF149)
MHNG 1933.017 (JF216)
(JF217) (skeleton in preparation)
MHNG 1933.016 (JF218)
Tissue (breast muscle or liver) was sampled from all specimens, and is preserved at the museum indicated. Numbers between brackets refer
to collector’s field numbers. MNHN, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; MHNG, Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneve;
NLCA, Nam Lan Conservation Area; PDD, Phou Dendin NPA.
1999, Brickie etal. in prep.). Mountain Bamboo Partridge
inhabits densely vegetated non-forest (bamboo, scrub and
forest edge and degraded areas), and these multiple records
within walking distance of a provincial capital imply strong
resilience to today’s conditions. Moreover, the species
remains common (and commonly taken) in and around
Nam Ha, Nam Et and Phou Louey NPAs (M. Hedemark
and A. Johnson verbally 2005). Other recent surveyors
not finding the species probably spent little time in suitable
habitats (which look rather unpromising for most key
species) and/or did not know its call.
[Common Pheasant Phasianus colchicus
Phou Dendin NPA: two (one male), 1 5 or 1 6 December,
in bamboo and scrub with many pools, seeps, and seasonal
streams, north and east of Ban Siengnua, by the
mammalogist D. P. Lunde (verbally 2004).
There are no records of Common Pheasant from Laos.
The observer, somewhat familiar with the species from
America, noted red facial skin hanging down below the
bill line, a brownish body, and no apparent neck-ring.
The birds flew when flushed, typical for this species but
unusual in Laos for Lophura and Polyplectron. The habitat
30
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
seemed suitable for this species, which is known from
adjoining East Myanmar and East Tonkin, Vietnam
(Robson 2000). No interviewee of WGR described
anything fitting Common Pheasant, but except those at
Ban Laophouchai, they lived many kilometres from the
observation site, in different habitat.]
GREAT Barbet Megalaima virens
(, Selected records only ) Four in fruit trees in a Phongsaly
town-edge garden on 8 December, one in Ban Boun-Nua
town centre on 23 December, and records close to villages
elsewhere in November-December, all show surprising
proximity to people for such a large bird in Laos, where
species of this size-class are heavily hunted. Also, a single
along the Bakong trail on 23 December was >2 km from
any forest. Recent Lao records come from forest remote
from towns (Tizard exal. 1997, Davidson 1998, Duckworth
et al. 1 998a, 2002, Evans and Timmins 1 998, Showier et
al. 1998b, R. J. Timmins, M. Hedemark and A. Johnson
verbally 2005, P. Davidson in litt. 2005; Appendix 1),
although it enters Hong Kong gardens with mature trees
(Carey et al. 2001), and TT now finds it frequently in
heavily degraded areas of Louang-Namtha province.
Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris
Phou Dendin NPA: heard upstream of Nam Ou camp
#2 on 27 March 1996, along the lower Houay Hin on 2
December, and at Nam Ou camp #2 on 4-5 December.
A fresh carcass being cooked, Ban Hathin, December,
and two birds downstream of the village, 1 9 March 2005.
A primary feather, Ban Tan, December. Phou Taleng:
heard, 20 March 2005. Other: several singles or small
groups, Nam Ngay, 23-27 March 1996.
Pied Hornbills in Phou Dendin NPA in May 1995
(Duckworth et al. 1998a) were also found only rarely:
twice (1-3 birds) in ten days (WGR unpublished data).
None was found at Ban Muangyo in 2004-2005, where
it was collected in 1929 (FMNH 78004-78005, Bangs
and Van Tyne 1931). Hornbills are the only landbirds
widely eradicated from remaining (semi-) evergreen Lao
forest (Thewlis et al. 1998). Pied Hornbill is the most
resilient: it was the only hornbill found around Vientiane
(Duckworth 1996), in Muong Nhe Nature Reserve of
adjacent Vietnam (Nguyen Due Tu et al. 2001), and (of
five species previously) in Chiang Mai province of
Thailand’s northern highlands (Round 1984), but has
nonetheless disappeared from most of Thailand (Lynam
et al. 2006) . In the riverine forests of the Hukaung valley,
Myanmar, several groups are found per day (JWD, TT
unpublished data): habitat similarities with Phongsaly
imply the current population there is greatly declined,
and indeed densities are low across most of Laos.
Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis Globally Near
Threatened; At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: several tail feathers at a hunters’
camp at Nam Ou camp #1,30 November. In December,
two old heads/casques at Ban Tan and one at Ban Hathin.
This hornbill was seen in Phou Dendin NPA (not
outside the NPA, contra Thewlis etal. 1998) in May 1995.
BROWN Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli Globally Near
Threatened; Potentially At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: heard 2 km south-east of Ban Hathin
on 26 March 1996; along the Nam Khang, a fairly fresh
head at a Hmong paddy at the trailhead to Ban Soppha,
6 December, and a single bird upstream of BanTatoung,
8 December. Other: one, Nam Ngay, c.5 km north-west
of Ban Ngay-Tai, 26 March 1996.
Villagers reported this species to remain locally
common in the NPA, but the paucity of records suggests
a much-reduced population, and there was only a single
record in May 1995, near the Nam Ou (not outside the
NPA, contra Thewlis et al. 1998). None was found in Ban
Muangyo in 2004-2005, the only historical site in the
province for the species (FMNH 78002-78003, Bangs
and Van Tyne 1931).
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis Globally
Vulnerable; At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: two flew across the Nam La (900-
1,100 m), 20 March 1996.
This is the only Globally Threatened species ( sensu
BirdLife International 2004) known from Phongsaly
province, so the failure to relocate it in 2004-2005 is of
concern. Various villagers indicated it as present in Phou
Dendin NPA in 2004-2005, but stated that it was rarer
than the other four hornbill species. Like all big hornbills,
its local population can only be tiny.
Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus At Risk in Laos
Phou D endin NPA: singles, Nam Ou near Ban
Pumouang, 1 9 March 1 996 (located outside the NPA, in
error, by Thewlis et al. 1998), and near Ban Hathin, 19
March 2005.
Lao populations are greatly reduced, and widely locally
extinct (Thewlis et al. 1998).
Common Hoopoe Upupa epops
Phou Dendin NPA: one Ban Tatoung, on 9 December.
Around Phongsaly town: one, Khounsouk trail, 14
December. Other: two singles and a duo, Nam Ngay,
23-28 March 1996.
Both resident and Palaearctic wintering Hoopoes occur
in Laos. The former are now very localised (Duckworth
et al. 2002), but formerly inhabited Phongsaly province:
Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) recorded an adult male, one
immature male and two adult females (FMNH 77996-
77999) from Ban Boun-Tai during 24-31 May 1929.
Around Vientiane migrants depart in March; none remain
by May (DVG and JWD unpublished data). The
December and March records cannot be distinguished
between remnant resident populations in the province
and non-breeding visitors . Surveys in May-August would
clarify hoopoe status in the province.
Dollarbird Eurystomus orientalis
Phou Dendin NPA: common along the Nam Ou during
19-27 March 1996 and 12-27 March 2005; one, Nam
Va, 24 March 2005. Phou Taleng: one, 21 March 2005.
Nam Lan CA: one, 9 March 2005, near the ‘hot springs’.
Other: up to three, Nam Ngay, three dates during 23-28
March 1996.
The many sightings in March, in contrast with no
records in May, November and December 2004
(Appendix 1 ) or in April-May 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne
1931), suggest the species is merely a passage migrant to
the province, but it may be a local breeding visitor: it was
assessed as common in May 1995 along the Nam Ou
both inside and outside Phou Dendin NPA (Duckworth
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
31
etal. 1998a). Dollarbird is a wet-season visitor to at least
some of North Laos (Duckworth 1 996), but has a complex
seasonality in the country. The Phongsaly March timing
accords with its passage through the Vientiane plain (JWD
unpublished data).
BLYTH’S Kingfisher Alcedo Hercules Globally Near
Threatened; Potentially At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: two singles and a duo on the lower
Nam Sing on 20 March, and one further up this stream
on 21 March 1996 (these dates correct those in Thewlis
etal. 1998). Singles on the Nam Ou [between Ban Hatxa
and Ban Pusum) and near Ban Hathin on 30 November,
and at an un-named stream mouth upstream of the Houay
Matiaho on 1 December. One, lower Houay Hin, 2
December. Singles, Nam Ou on 12 March 2005, on a
small stream near Ban T an on 1 8 March 2005, along the
upper Nam Va on 24 March 2005 [and along the Houay
Ling on 25 March 2005] . One mist-netted Nam Nu near
Ban Hathin, 19 March 2005. Ban Muangyo area: one,
Nam Hoy downstream of Ban Namhoy, 24 December.
Other: one on a forested stream c.25 km west-north-
west of Phongsaly town, 24 March 1996.
The records probably underestimate the Phou Dendin
NPA population, because the species usually uses shallow
streams of 2-20 m width (Thewlis et al. 1998), yet most
search effort was along the main Nam Ou. Most sightings
were indeed up, or close to the mouths of, tributaries.
This population is probably large and contiguous with
that found in adjacent Muong Nhe Nature Reserve,
Vietnam, by Nguyen Due Tu et al. (2001). The only
historical record from the province was from Ban Muangyo
(FMNH7791 1, Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). Two records
are from scrub, but forested rivers might be needed
seasonally, and both records were from near forest; so it
would be premature to consider the species independent
of forest.
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
Nam Lan CA: two, ‘hot springs’, 10 May 2004; one,
small stream near Ban Namaek, 30 May 2004.
One was collected at Ban Muangyo on 12 May 1929
(FMNH 77910; Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). Duckworth
et al. (1998a) reviewed Lao records and found very few
within November-March, with an upsurge in April. These
May records further suggest, through paired visits to the
same sites, that the species migrates, although its breeding
distribution remains unclear: it was found at the only site
in North Laos with suitable habitat investigated recently
in the presumed breeding season, June-July (Duckworth
1996).
RUDDY Kingfisher Halcyon coromanda Little Known in
Lao PDR
Nam Lan CA: two mist-netted together, ‘bat caves’, 12
May 2004.
The relatively few past Lao records all fall in April-
June, and observation of apparent territoriality suggests
breeding, at least in the Annamites (Duckworth et al.
1999, Robichaud and Stuart 1999).
Black-capped Kingfisher Halcyon pileata
Phou Dendin NPA: singles, Nam Ou near Nam Va
mouth, 28 March 1996 and 30 November. Other: two
singles near Pak-Ou, 25 November.
This species’s seasonality in North Laos is unclear.
David-Beaulieu (1944) considered it a common resident
in Xiangkhouang province, and (p . 179) apparently found
it nesting. Robson (2000) stated it wintered throughout
South-East Asia, i.e. including North Laos. That only
three individuals were seen in November-December
supports discussion in Duckworth et al. (2002) that mid¬
winter records are so rare in the Lao northern highlands
that it is only a passage migrant, as in the Hukaung valley,
northern Myanmar (JWD and TT unpublished data). It
overwinters regularly around Vientiane (JWD unpublished
data), and, coastally, further north, e.g. Hong Kong (Carey
et al. 2001). There are no breeding-season records from
Phongsaly province (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931,
Duckworth et al. 1998a; Appendix 1), and if it breeds at
all in the province, it must be localised. Formerly it was a
more common breeder in Hong Kong (Carey et al. 200 1 ),
so breeders have perhaps also declined in northern Laos.
Chestnut-headed Bee-eater Merops leschenaulti
Phou Dendin NPA: common, Nam Ou, 18-28 March
1996. At least ten. Ban Hatxa-Ban Hathin, 17 and 27
March 2005. Two, Ban Hathin, 18-19 and 25 March
2005. Present, Ban Sopkhang, 22 March 2005. Other:
common, Nam Ou, Khoa-Ban Hatxa, 14-18 March 1996.
Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) reported 11 specimens
from Ban Boun-T ai in May-June (FMNH 7796 5-7 7978),
and it was common in the province in May 1995
(Duckworth et al. 1998a). The lack of records in
November-December implies strong seasonal movements,
presumably out of the province given that the lowest
altitudes were covered.
ASIAN Koel Eudynamys scolopacea
Phou Dendin NPA: one, Nam Ou, Ban Hathin-Ban
Hatxa, 27 March 2005. Nam Lan CA: singles heard, Ban
Long Nay Mai-Ban Boun-Tai, 8 March and Ban Boun-
Tai-BanNaten, 9 March 2005. Other: one over the road
near the Oudomxai province border, 1 June 2004.
Asian Koel was historically common in the northern
highlands (e.g. David-Beaulieu 1944) and was collected
in Ban Muangyo on 9 May 1929 (FMNH 77778-77779;
Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), but in 1996-2005 was found
only sparsely in the spring calling period. March records
could even relate to passage birds, but the June sighting
suggests at least local breeding. Evidently Koels declined
greatly in the province during the past half-century,
reflecting absence or scarcity of their breeding hosts
(corvids and sturnids). Koel seems otherwise recently
unrecorded from the northern highlands (Pasquet 1997,
Tizardefa/. 1997, Davidson 1998, Duckworth etal. 1998a,
2002, Showier et al. 1998b, Brooks and Sorensen 2001,
DVG and TT unpublished data) making the Phongsaly
birds of significance, especially as it also occurs in adjacent
Muong Nhe Nature Reserve, Vietnam (Nguyen Due Tu
et al. 2001). It remains widespread and, in a few places,
common, in South and Central Laos (Thewlis etal. 1996,
Davidson et al. 1997, Cunningham 1998, Duckworth et
al. 1998a, Evans and Timmins 1998, Round 1998,
Steinmetz et al. 1999, Evans et al. 2000a, Evans 2001),
and may be on the brink of (re-)colonising Vientiane city
(JWD unpublished data).
Grey-headed Parakeet Psittacula finschii
Phou Dendin NPA: two captives, Ban Laophouchai, 23
32
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
March 2005 . Around Phongsaly town: a chained young
bird, 15 March 1996.
The lack of field sightings suggest a tenuous provincial
status for Grey-headed Parakeet. It was collected at Ban
Boun-Tai (FMNH 77816) and (four) Ban Laophouchai
(FMNH 77817-77820; Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), and
Coolidge and Roosevelt (1933) mentioned ‘great flocks
of green parrots’ along the Nam Ou, in stark contrast to
the total lack of sightings of any parakeet in 1 996-2005.
(The flocks might have been or included Red-breasted
Parakeet P. alexandri, recorded recently from adjacent
Muong Nhe Nature Reserve of Vietnam: Nguyen Due
Tu et al. 2001.) Indeed, in the northern highlands all
recent parakeet records are of captives, around Nam Fla
NPA and, quite regularly during 2005, in Nam Tha and
Vieng Phou Ivha districts of Louang-Namtha province
(Tizard et al. 1997, TT unpublished data). Previously it
was locally common at mid-altitude in Xiangkhouang
province (David-Beaulieu 1944), but even in 1938-1939,
in the upper Lao Mekong and Louangphabang, Delacour
and Greenway (1940b) found only young captives (at
Ban Nam Kheung-Kao and Lo-Tiao). Large populations
of Grey-headed Parakeets remain in South and Central
Laos (Thewlis et al. 1996, Davidson et al. 1997,
Cunningham 1998, Duckworth et al. 1998a, Evans and
Timmins 1 998, Steinmetz et al. 1 999, Evans et al. 2000a,
Evans 2001), but the only recent field record from the
North is from the Nam Chat/Nam Phan Provincial
Protected Area, Bolikhamxai province (Tizard 1996).
White-throated Needletail Hirundapus caudacutus
Nam Lan CA: 4-5, Nam Lan near Ban Naten, 8-9 May
2004; one, Ban Long Nay Mai, 23 May 2004.
This is a scarce passage migrant in North Laos
(Duckworth et al. 1999, Robson 2000). Most Lao spring
records are before mid-May (JWD unpublished data) and
the latest spring date in Hong Kong is 1 1 May (Carey et
al. 2001).
Brown-backed Needletail Hirundapus giganteus
(, Selected records only ) Around Phongsaly town: two,
[14] and 26 December, Phou Fa; six, 18 December,
Bakong trail; four, 19 December, Khomen trail; two
unidentified needletails, Nam Fan, 20 December. Other:
three unidentified needletails, Ban Hatxa, 30 November.
This swift occurs widely in Laos, including Phongsaly
province (FMNH 77861-77867; Bangs and Van Tyne
1931, Duckworth et al. 1999; Appendix 1). Robson (2000)
stated that it was ‘possibly only [a] breeding visitor to
some (more northerly) areas [of South-East Asia]’.
Regular records around Phongsaly town in December
suggest year-round presence even in northernmost Laos.
Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis
(. Selected records only ) Of the sites palm swifts were found
at in the province (Appendix 1), they were common only
around villages (both current and abandoned) along the
Nam Ou in December. This is one of the most ubiquitous
Lao village birds, yet Phongsaly town evidently lacked it,
and it was rare or unrecorded around Ban Muangyo and
Ban Boun-Nua. This probably does not reflect
persecution, because it was one of few common urban
Lao birds in the early 1990s, when sustained, almost
indiscriminate, hunting brought town bird populations
to their lowest ebb; and it was not found in the town by
Bangs and Van Tyne (1931). Apart from a single flock of
three heading north over Phou T aleng on 2 1 March 2005,
the highest recorded palm swifts on the current survey
were at only c.840 m (at Ban Namhoy). The palm trees
with which they apparently associate elsewhere in Laos
were not seen in Phongsaly town. Ban Muangyo or Ban
Boun-Nua, and this may explain the pattern.
Large owls Ketupa spp., Spot-bellied Eagle Owl
Bubo nipalensis and Brown Wood Owl Strix
leptogrammica
Phou Dendin NPA: a fish owl carrying a fish across the
Nam Ou downstream of the Houay Hin mouth at 08h00,
4 December. An owl heard ( hoohoo-roo , all notes about
one pitch) at Nam Ou camp #2, 4-5 December. A probable
fish owl near Ban Laophouchai, 23 March 2005. Around
Phongsaly town: one heard (hooo-hoo (pr) oooo, in relative
timing and emphasis of the two notes and pause, just as
the two introductory notes of Common Wood Pigeon
Columba palumbus song in U.K.) from a small, degraded
copse below the Bakong trail, 1 8 December. Heard, similar
in call, Phou Fa, 19 March 2005. A Spot-bellied Eagle
Owl for sale in Ban Pangxo in September 2003, reportedly
caught locally in a net. Ban Muangyo area: heard, 22
March 2005; call similar to that of 18 December. Nam
Lan CA: a fish owl carrying a fish into a tree hole by the
Nam Lan near the ‘hot springs’, 10 March, and one over
the Nam Lan near the ‘bat caves’, 12 March 2005. Other:
two large owls along the Nam Ngay, 26 March 1996.
Duckworth et al (1999) listed all large owls except
Brown Wood Owl 5. leptogrammica as Potentially At Risk
in Laos or Little Known in Laos. Difficulties of visual
detection and identification are compounded by only weak
knowledge of vocalisations, including possible overlap
between species. Large owls (as a group) are seen
noticeably rarely along Lao forest rivers compared with,
e.g., India, and have presumably declined. They seem to
be sought as ‘living trophies’ in Laos and remains are
sometimes found at hunters’ camps. A freshly killed Brown
Wood Owl in Oudomxai market on 14 December 2004
(WGR) seems to be the first recent record for North
Laos, although it was previously found in Xiangkhouang
(David-Beaulieu 1 944), and Phongsaly town on 29 April
1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). There are few recent
records of Spot-bellied Eagle Owl B. nipalensis for Laos
(Duckworth etal. 1 999). Tawny Fish Owl K.flavipes was
collected in adjacent Vietnam (Muong Mo) in 1929
(Bangs and Van Tyne 1931) and recently found in Muong
Nhe Nature Reserve (Nguyen Due Tu etal. 2001). It may
well occur in Phongsaly province, as might Brown Fish
Owl K. zeylonensis, but no other resident large owl is
expected. Wherever possible, birds should be sound-
recorded for later identification, and cast feathers or other
remains collected for museum comparison.
Ashy Wood Pigeon Columba pulchricollis Little Known
in Laos.
Nam Lan CA: a flock of five near the ‘bat caves’, 1 1
March 2005.
This is only the second Lao record (see Duckworth et
al. 2002), but there are two subsequent records: 1-2 caged
birds at Pakxan, Bolikhamxai province, in June-July 2005
(T. E. Hansel in litt. 2005), and a flock of at least 55-70+
in (semi-)evergreen forest, near a mineral lick within
0.5 km of Ban Houaysan, southern Nakai-Nam Theun
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
33
NPA (17°50'N 105°30'E), at c.580 m, on 5 November
2005 (WGR unpublished data).
Oriental Turtle Dove Streptopelia orientalis
Phou Dendin NPA: six near Ban Hathin, 26 March
1996; 2-3, Nam Ou upstream of Houay Hin mouth, 2
December; one downstream of there, 4 December; 3-4,
Ban Tatoung, 6 December; three, Nam La, 10 and 12
December; c. 1 5, Ban Siengnua, 1 0 December; one, lower
Nam Houn, 1 3 December; one, Nam Ou, 1 2 March, two
near Ban Hathin, 18 March, and two downstream of Ban
Pusum, 19 March 2005. Around Phongsaly town: [one,
Khounsouk trail, 8 December] . Bakong trail, 1-4 birds on
all three visits in March 2005 . Several and two birds caged
in Phongsaly town in September 2003 and on 1 1 December
respectively. Other: two caged in Khoa, 26 November.
This dove occurs across Laos, but current distribution
is patchy (e.g. Thewlis etal. 1996, Tizard 1996, Davidson
et al. 1997, Evans and Timmins 1998, Duckworth et al.
1 998a, Walston and Vinton 1 999, Steinmetz et al. 1 999,
Evans et al. 2000a) . Large declines have occurred at least
locally in North Laos: in Xiangkhouang province, it was
formerly fairly common in winter (David-Beaulieu 1 944),
yet during winters 1998-2000 none was found
(Duckworth et al. 2002). There are recent records from
a few sites in the northern highlands (Tizard et al. 1997,
Davidson 1998, Showier et al. 1998b). A review of
historical and recent records, including seasonality (there
are probably both resident and visiting populations) across
Laos, is needed. Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) collected it
frequently in adjacent Tonkin to mid-March, but found
none in Laos during April and May. In this context, the
provisional report from the Nam Ou on 31 May 1995
(Duckworth et al. 1 998a, WGR unpublished data) needs
corroboration. In Hong Kong it is solely a migrant, and
April records are regular with small numbers into May in
most years (Carey et al. 2001).
SPOTTED Dove Streptopelia chinensis
Phou Dendin NPA: Ban Hathin, [one, 20 March 1 996;
six, 30 November ]; two, 18 March 2005. Nam La, 18 on
10 December, three on 12 December. One near Ban
Tan, 18 March 2005. Around Phongsaly town: one,
caged, March 2005. Ban Muangyo area: one 6 km south,
27 December. Nam Lan CA: one, Ban Long Nay Mai,
7 March 2005. Other: 1-2 by the Nam Ou around Ban
Hatxa and downstream, 14 and 30 March 1996. Two,
Nam Ngay near Ban Ngay-Tai, 26 March 1996. One a
few miles after Ban Boun-Tai and two 69 km before Ban
Paknamnoy (with two Streptopelia sp.), 27 December.
Two at Ban Boun-Gnang, four just north of Ban Boun-
Tai, two 8 km south of Ban Boun-Tai and two 3 km
north-west of Ban Namli, on 26 March 2005.
There were only a few records of unidentified
Streptopelia (including several in Ban Boun-Nua-Ban Ngay
Tai, March 1996); Spotted Dove is scarce and localised
in the province. Large populations of Spotted Dove persist
in South and Central Laos (Duckworth 1996, Thewlis et
al. 1996, Davidson et al. 1997, Cunningham 1998,
Duckworth etal. 1998a, Evans and Timmins 1998, Round
1998, Showier etal. 1998a, Steinmetz etal. 1999, Walston
and Vinton 1999, Evans et al. 2000a, Evans 2001), and it
was found in all surveys of the northern highlands although
it was not generally assessed as common there (Tizard et
al. 1997, Davidson 1998, Showier et al. 1998b, Brooks
and Sorensen 2001, Duckworth et al. 2002), including
previously in Phou Dendin NPA (one by the Nam Ou, 25
May 1995; Duckworth et al. 1998a, WGR unpublished
data). In some areas, the species occurs only as occasional
wanderers, e.g. Vientiane city and nearby rural areas
(Duckworth and Tizard 2003; DVG and JWD
unpublished data) and in Xiangkhouang province, where
it was formerly common, recent surveys failed to find it
(David-Beaulieu 1944, Duckworth et al. 2002). Bangs
and Van Tyne (1931) reported only one specimen from
Phongsaly (FMNH 77703), with no comment on
abundance, so it is unclear whether the current scarcity
in superficially suitable habitats reflects a naturally low
population or a recent reduction.
Red COLLARED Dove Streptopelia tranquebarica
Phou Dendin NPA: [two, lower Nam Khang, 6
December]. Phou Taleng: one by the road (c. 1,300 m),
1 6 September 2003. [Other: one on a sandbar c.3 hours
down the Nam Ou from Khoa, 31 March 1996.)
A large post-breeding population in North Laos
(attributed to winter visitors by David-Beaulieu 1944)
seems to have declined greatly (Duckworth et al. 2002).
Historical status in Phongsaly province is unclear: the
Kelley-Roosevelts’ expedition visited in May, so their
lack of records is uninformative.
Little Cuckoo Dove Macropygia ruficeps Potentially
At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: [one, Nam Ou downstream Houay
Hin mouth, 4 December] . Two singles at c. 1 ,500 m near
Phou Namla, 17 March 2005.
These are the first recent Lao records, despite several
multi-week surveys of presumably suitable habitat (Tizard
etal. 1997, Showier et al. 1998b, Davidson 1998, 1999),
of a species historically recorded widely in the North, and
sometimes called common (Delacour and Jabouille 1927,
Delacour 1929, Delacour and Greenway 1940b, David-
Beaulieu 1944, Dickinson 1970a, 1970b). It was collected
at Ban Muangyo on 1 5 May 1929 (FMNH 75322; Bangs
and Van Tyne 1931). It is unclear either why it would
have been overlooked recently, or what factor could have
caused a decline so much stronger than in other hill forest
pigeons, which each remain throughout their historical
Lao range, albeit reduced in numbers.
Pompadour Green Pigeon Treron pompadora At Risk
in Lao PDR
Nam Lan CA: a small flock near the ‘hot springs’
(c.670 m), 10-11 May 2004, perched conspicuously,
allowing solid identification.
Both this species and the similar Thick-billed Green
Pigeon T. curvirostra were previously collected in Ban
Boun-Tai (T. pompadora FMNH 77732; T. curvirostra
FMNH 75319 and 77733-77736; Bangs and Van Tyne
1931). The ‘hot springs’ are salty and the species is known
to visit salt licks (Baptista et al. 1997). Although recorded
fairly widely in Laos historically (Meyer de Schauensee
1934, Thewlis et al. 1998 and references therein), the
only two other sites with recent records are both near
Vientiane: Sangthong district (Duckworth 1996) and the
lower Nam Ngum plain in 2005 (M. K. Poulsen and
JWD unpublished data). Previous Lao records in hilly
terrain are from below 300 m, with observations up to
600 m only in level areas.
34
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Mountain Imperial Pigeon Ducula badia
(, Selected records only ) Nam Lan CA: 30 on 12 May 2004
and a flock of c. 1 30 on 1 1 March 2005, near the ‘bat caves’.
Most daily counts in Laos are below 20 birds (JWD,
WGR, TT unpublished data), as were the other records
on the present surveys (Appendix 1), and the species is
undoubtedly below carrying capacity in most areas.
Declines have also been claimed in Thailand (Baptista et
al. 1997), but are neither widespread nor severe enough
to consider the species as even nationally near-threatened
(Round 2000).
River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: singles near Ban Hathin, 1 9 and 28
March 1996 (within the NPA, cowrra Thewlis etal. 1998).
River Lapwing has declined in Lao tributaries with
dense human settlement (Duckworth etal. 1998b, 2002).
Its historical status on the Nam Ou is unclear: it was
recorded from Vang Pha Ho, upstream of Ban Muangngoy
(Dickinson 1970a), but Bangs and Van Tyne (1931)
largely ignored river channel species in the Nam Ou (see
above). In the 1 990s, up to six were found on every visit
to the PhongsalyNamOu (March 1992, May 1995, March
1996; Thewlis et al. 1998). The Hatxa-Hathin stretch
provided all the 1995-1996 spring records (WGR and
TT unpublished data), but none was seen there in 2004-
2005, despite much more boat travel. The Nam Ou is too
narrow and the channel too simple for birds to be
overlooked. Human activity in suitable habitat is high,
hence the species’s apparent recent local extinction.
GREY-HEADED Lapwing Vanellus cinereus Potentially At
Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: twelve, Nam Khang mouth, 27
March 1996 (within the NPA, contra Thewlis etal. 1998).
Other: along the Nam Ou, two duos between Ivhoa and
Ban Hatxa, 14 March, and one upstream of Ban Hatxa,
28 March 1996; groups of 1 7, nine, and one, upstream of
Ban Hatxa, 1 7 March 2005. Near Ban Boun-Tai, c.5, 13
September 2003. Ban Boun-Nua, three, 16 December,
and eleven, 23 December.
Most paddies around Ban Boun-Nua and Ban Boun-
Tai were not checked, so numbers might be much
underestimated. Grey-headed Lapwing seems to be
regular on the Nam Ou only on passage, yet on the Mekong
at similar latitudes many winter (Duckworth et al. 2002) .
LESSER Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis Globally Near
Threatened; At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: singles upstream of Nam Ou camp
#2, 27 March 1996 and at Nam Khan mouth, 28 March
1996. 1-2 between Nam Va and the mouth of the Nam
Long, and one just downstream of Ban Hathin, on 30
November. One, probably two, [and feathers of a
butchered bird at a hunters’ camp] at 22°05'N 102°10'E
(measured by GPS) and two singles between there and
the Houay Hin mouth on 1 December. Two a little
upstream of the Houay Hin mouth on 2 December, and
1-2 there, one near Hat Chan, and one near the Houay
Ivhanionho mouth on 3 December. Two just downstream
of the Nam Hin mouth, one upstream of the Houay
Matiaho mouth, and two at Nam Ou camp #2 on 4
December. Singles at this last site and at Nam Ou camp
#1 on 5 December. One c.2 km up the Nam Khang on
6 December, and 2-3 on that river, Ban Tatoung-Ban
Soppha trailhead on 6-8 December. Singles, Ban Hathin
and Nam Long mouth-Nam Va on 7 December. Two
singles, and two Ichthyophaga sp., Houay Hin mouth-
Nam Va mouth, 1 3 December. One just upstream of Ban
Siengnua (Nam Houn) on 12 December. All sites are on
or beside the Nam Ou, except, as indicated, on the Nam
Houn and Nam Khang. In March 2005, only Ban Hatxa-
Ban Hathin was covered; three singles were seen. Other:
one Ichthyophaga sp., Nam Ngay, 26 March 1996.
These 2004 figures show at least eight territories along
the Nam Ou (nearly all suitable habitat was covered), two
along the Nam Khang (only half covered), and one along
the Nam Houn (less than a third), suggesting the three
rivers might support c. 15 territories. Mapped width of
river and adjacent forest cover suggest possible territories
on the Nam Va (one) andNamPaho (1-2). If the narrower
rivers also support breeders, the NPA population might
well exceed 20 pairs. The Nam Ngay sighting indicates
that rivers outside the NPA also hold fish eagles, but
mapped stream sizes and habitat cover suggest that
numbers are probably smaller. In late spring 1 995 in Phou
Dendin NPA, single Lesser Fish Eagles were found at two
sites between the Nam Va mouth and Ban Hathin, with
three singles between Ban Sopkhang and the Houay Y oong
temple; plus a further Ichthyophaga sp. along the lower
Nam La (Thewlis et al. 1998, amended by WGR
unpublished data) . The higher numbers in 2004 probably
just reflect better coverage, not an increase; persistent rain
blighted the only day in 1996 in the key stretch, that
upstream of the Nam Khang’s mouth. Almost all birds
were aged; none was an immature. This might indicate
poor reproduction (but in the presumably healthy
population of Hukaung Valley, all birds observed along
the main rivers were also adult: JWD and TT unpublished
data) so future observers should age birds and record the
precise locality of all sightings, and attempt to find nests
and evaluate their success.
Nakai-Nam Theun NPA and adjacent Nakai Plateau
hold 4-10 territories (Thewlis et al. 1998) and the Xe
Kong basin (of Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, including
the Sesan and Srepok) a few dozen (R. J. Timmins
verbally 2005). The species is scarce and localised in
Cambodia (Poole 2001), Thailand (P. D. Round in litt.
2005) and Vietnam (J. Tordoff in litt. 2005); no other
Indochinese population may reach comparable density.
Phou Dendin NPA probably supports the largest Lao
population of Lesser Fish Eagle, one of the most significant
in mainland South-East Asia (although the Hukaung
Valley, north Myanmar, has many more; JWD and TT
unpublished data), certainly in Indochina. In Nepal it is
now very rare (assessed as Nationally critically endangered)
following prolonged decline, and it is rare all over the
Indian subcontinent (Baral and Inskipp 2004), so the
Phongsaly population may be highly significant for
continental Asia.
Fish eagles are nationally threatened because they need
forested large watercourses, among the most threatened
habitats in Laos (Thewlis et al. 1998). Large rivers are
fishing sites and access routes and seasonal camps for
rural Lao, and so their birds are more in contact with
people than are interior forest species. Fish eagles are
large, easily seen and hence tempting targets: they perch
for long periods in riverside trees, rather than soaring
high, out of gun range. No population sources in remote
habitats exist to repopulate accessible areas. Nesting
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
35
habits, not known in Laos, may, if typical of large raptors,
expose them to robbery. Hence, Thewlis et al. (1998)
found the species ‘now reduced to a few isolated
populations in the least-disturbed drainage basins (Xe
Kong, Nam Theun, Nam Ou and perhaps others) between
which dispersal may be limited. Each is vulnerable by
nature of its small size’. No new large populations have
been found in Laos; a few birds were seen in Dong
Khanthung proposed NPA (Round 1998) and the known
extent of the Xe Kong population was expanded by
Davidson et al. (1997) and Duckworth et al. (1999).
Historically, the species was collected near Phou
Dendin NPA on the Nam Na river, Vietnam (Bangs and
Van Tyne 1931). Surveys have been inadequate to tell
whether birds still occur there (J. Tordoff in litt. 2005),
but if they do, the Phou Dendin NPA population would
have greater resilience to extinction.
Vulture
A ‘vulture’ reportedly killed in Phongsaly district in winter
1 997-1998 was exhibited for a few days at a district office
(O. Ducourtieux verbally 2003). Resident vultures are
extinct across most of South-East Asia (Pain et al. 2003),
with no recent records from North Laos. Long-distance
migrant Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus and
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis presumably occur,
but have not yet certainly been recorded from Laos. A 58-
year-old in Ban Hathin reported that when he was 10-15
years old, there were a few vultures in the area, ‘with red
bills’, but none remains today.
Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus
Around Phongsaly town: [Phou Fa, a female, 10
December; Khounsouk trail, one, 14 December.] Bakong
trail, a female, 18 December. Ban Muangyo area: Ban
Muangyo, a female, 24 December.
Two birds seen very well allowed the first recent certain
Lao records, after a few provisional sightings (Duckworth
etal. 1 998a, 2002) . Perhaps more birds than usual arrived
in Laos in winter 2004-2005: on 8 March 2005 a female
at Bung That Louang, Vientiane (JWD unpublished data)
was well away from previous Lao sites.
Grey-faced Buzzard Butastur indicus
{Selected records only ) Around Phongsaly town: Phou
Fa, an immature, 15 December, and an adult and
immature, 26 December. Bakong trail, two, 1 7 December,
and one, 18 December. Trail to the Nam Fan, one, 20
December. Ban Muangyo area: Ban Namhoy, one, 24
December 2004. Some other unidentified raptors seen in
December may have been this species.
Evidently this raptor winters in Phongsaly province,
although Robson (2000) classed it as only a passage
migrant to North and Central Laos, and it may do so
regularly: there are also December-February records from
Nam Kading NPA and nearby (Duckworth et al 1998a,
JWD unpublished data), the Kelley-Roosevelts’
Expedition collected one from adjacent Vietnam (Lai
Chau) on 28 February 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931),
and it was also recorded in mid-winter from northern
Thailand (Deignan 1945). It is, however, only a passage
migrant in Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001). Records in
March 2005 (Appendix 1) included several in the same
precise spots as in December, presumably involving the
same individual birds.
Changeable Hawk Eagle Spizaetus citrhatus
Phou Dendin NPA: two near Ban Hathin, 18 March
2005, seen for several minutes by telescope on the opposite
bank of the Nam Ou; neither had a crest.
The only previous records from the Lao northern
highlands, from David-Beaulieu (1944), are in doubt: he
stated that the birds had long crests and he saw no dark-
phase birds, whereas in Annam and Cochinchina they
had crests only exceptionally, and dark birds were
common. It was not then clear that Spizaetus had two
species in Indochina, Mountain Hawk Eagle 5. nipalensis
with a long crest and Changeable Hawk Eagle with no
substantial crest and a common dark morph. Ripley (1953)
re-examined one of David-Beaulieu’s specimens and
confirmed that it was indeed a Mountain Hawk Eagle.
Hence, the northernmost previous Lao record was from
the Nam Chat/Nam Phan provincial conservation area
(Tobias 1997), and there are no records from adjacent
China or northern Vietnam (Robson 2000). Deignan
(1945) rejected the only claim from northern Thailand,
but although in Thailand it is mainly a bird of plains and
lower hills it does occur on lower Doi Inthanon where, as
here, it is locally sympatric with Mountain Hawk Eagle
(P. D. Round in litt. 2005).
[Collared Falconet Microhierax caerulescens
Phou Dendin NPA: heard, broadleaved evergreen forest
on Phou Namla (c. 1,500 m), 14 and 15 March 2005.
Collared Falconet is known in Laos only from the
plains north to Vientiane (Duckworth 1996, Cunningham
1998, Duckworth et al. 1999, Evans et al. 2000a and
references therein). Elsewhere in South-East Asia it may
live up to 1,830 m (Deignan 1945, Robson 2000), and
RE, very familiar with the species’s calls from Thailand
(Eve 1990), did not try to see the birds. Robson (2000)
gave no records from nearby northern Vietnam or China.]
PIED Falconet Microhierax melanoleucos Little Known
in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: [singles, Nam Ou near the Houay
Khanionho mouth, 3 December; c.3 km upstream of the
Nam Hin mouth, 3 December; Nam Ou camp #2, 4
December; Ban Tatoung (Nam Khang), 6 December;
and] Nam Ou downstream of Ban Hathin, 27 March
2005. One falconet sp., upper Nam Va, 24 March 2005.
Around Phongsaly town: singles near Ban Pangxo, 26
November [over Ban Bakong, 18 December, and over
Phou Fa, 26 December].
Based on range and habitat of falconets in Laos in
Duckworth etal. (1999; see above), all birds in December
were assumed to be Pied Falconet. Following the report
of Collared (above), November-December ‘Pied
Falconets’ were reviewed and only one was supported by
identification notes. This is, by far, the biggest known
area in Laos supporting Pied Falconet, albeit apparently
sparsely. A low density is typical: there are often only 1-
2 contacts even on a multi-week survey (Laos: Thewlis et
al. 1998, Duckworth et al. 1999; Vietnam: R. J. Timmins
verbally 2005). The lack of previous records from the
province is surprising, although it was collected in adjacent
Vietnam (Muong Moun in late March 1929, Bangs and
Van Tyne 1931). Occupied areas ranged from the Nam
Ou valley at c.450 m to the summit of Phou Fa at 1,625
m, and included forest, streamside and degraded former
cultivation, close to or far from towns.
36
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
Other: one at a large karst, middle Nam Ou (1-2 km
downstream of Ban Pakbak), 25 November.
South-East Asia supports wintering Palaearctic
migrants and residents (Robson 2000). This bird’s ‘oily’
black-brown upperparts, large black cap including most
of the cheeks, and heavily dark-streaked off-white
underparts fitted very closely a young/7, p. ernesti , known
in South-East Asia only from Tonkin; residents from the
Thai-Malay peninsula into north-east Thailand,
morphologically similar to F. p. ernesti , are perhaps an
undescribed race (Robson 2005). The Nam Ou lies
between the two populations.
Peregrine is widespread in Laos in favoured habitat
(Thewlis et al. 1996, Cunningham 1998, Duckworth et
al. 1 998a, 2002, Parr and Parr 1 998, Walston and Vinton
1 999, Steinmetz etal. 1 999, Evans etal. 2000a, Duckworth
and Tizard 2003, JWD unpublished data), but there are
no Lao specimens of non-Palaearctic races, and few recent
records gave subspecies. Robson (2000) excluded Laos
from the breeding range, but Duckworth et al. ( 1 999) left
the matter open, citing a pair of ‘one of the resident races’
from Savannakhet town. Breeding populations, if indeed
occurring, may be rare and threatened.
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis
Ban Muangyo area: Ban Muangyo: one, with buffaloes,
24 December and 22 March 2005. Other: c.15 on 13
September (and some unidentified egrets), and one on
17 September 2003, near Ban Boun-Tai.
Autumn passage egrets occur throughout Laos, but
midwinter records are exceptional away from a few sites
(Duckworth et al. 2002; C. Wood verbally 2005). This
reflects hunting pressure: numbers rose rapidly at both
Ban Sivilai, Thulakhom district, Vientiane province, and
at Pakxan, Bolikhamxai province, following its near¬
cessation (Parr and Parr 1 998; J. W. K. Parr in litt. 2000,
C. Wood verbally 2005).
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax
Potentially At Risk in Laos
Other: Ban Boun-Nua: several heard, after dark, on 21
March 2005.
These birds flew to riverside paddies well after dark,
presumably from a secluded day roost. The few recent
published records from Laos were reviewed in Duckworth
et al. (1999). Also, around Vientiane it is frequent in
August-October, but very rare at other times, including
spring (DVG and JWD unpublished data).
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus
Phou Dendin NPA: a weak juvenile on a gravel spit in the
heavily forested E-W Nam Ou, upstream of the Houay
Matiaho, 1 December; caught by hand-thrown net; an
adult female on a Nam La river rock, amid paddies and
scrub, 10 December; a male, upper Nam Va, 24 March
2005 . Ban Muangyo area: a female, Ban Dua, 23 March
2005.
Cinnamon Bittern is usually listed as resident in Laos
(e.g. Robson 2000), but in Vientiane breeding areas birds
occur only from mid-late April to September-October
(DVG and JWD unpublished data). Ongoing review
traced only the following Lao records from November-
March: resident, although commoner in April-
September, in Xiangkhouang province (David-Beaulieu
1944);one, 12March 1996, Sangthong district, Vientiane
(Duckworth 1996); several lowland records from Dong
Hua Sao NPA, February 1996 (Evans et al. 2000a); and
one, Nong Tha, Vientiane (a breeding area), 7 March
2005 (JWD unpublished data). Moreover, in Central
Annam, Cinnamon Bittern was found to be ‘rare, if not
absent, in Quangtri during the winter, becoming
numerous in the spring’ (Delacour and Jabouille 1925),
and is extremely rare in Hong Kong in November-early
April (Carey et al. 2001). Around Chiang Mai, northern
Thailand, it showed a seasonal absence, but one different
in timing: it occurred during mid-January-October
(Deignan 1945). Winter distribution in Laos remains
unclear: these winter records were along forest rivers, a
habitat not much checked on the Vientiane plain.
Hooded Pitta Pitta sordida
Nam Lan CA: one mist-netted, 1 0 May 2004, near Ban
Naten.
The only other Lao records are of two from Ban Boun-
Tai in May 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931; FMNH
78230-78231), only 1 5 km from Ban Naten; common in
Phou Dendin NPA in May 1995 (Duckworth etal. 1998a);
and frequent in Dong Ampham NPA (South Laos) in
May 1997 (Davidson et al. 1997, Robson 1997). The
paucity of records no doubt reflects more this pitta’s late
spring arrival and limited survey during May-July (the
assumed calling season) than any genuine scarcity.
Long-tailed Shrike Lanins schach
Phou Dendin NPA: two singles, Nam La and trail to
Ban Tan, 10-12 December, [and two singles, Nam Pha,
6-8 December] ; one, Ban Namong, 2 1 March 2005 . None
by the Nam Ou in December, but one on 1 2 March 2005.
Around Phongsaly town: one on 24 May 2004. Seen
daily on all trails surveyed in December; but in March
2005, only one record: two, Bakong trail, 19 March 2005.
Ban Muangyo area: two, Ban Muangyo-Ban Bomang,
24 December. Ban Dua, one, 24 December, four, 25
December; two songsters, 23 March 2005. Other: singles,
[near Ban Ngay-Nua, 26 March 1996]; Ban Boun-Tai,
4 March and Ban Boun-Tai-Ban Long Nay Mai, 5 March
2005; beside the Nam Ou, near Ban Noua, 26 November.
Three roadside singles in the Ban Muangyo-Ban Boun-
Tai-Ban Paknamnoy stretch, 27 December. One near
Ban Kachet (Louangphabang province), 27 December.
Long-tailed Shrike has a curious Lao distribution.
Around and south of Vientiane it is very scarce (Thewlis
et al. 1996, Duckworth et al. 1998a, Evans and Timmins
1998, Round 1998, Walston and Vinton 1999), being
unrecorded by some long surveys (Duckworth 1996,
Tizard 1996, Davidson et al. 1997, Cunningham 1998,
Showier et al. 1998a, Steinmetz et al. 1999, Evans et al.
2000a, Evans 2001). By contrast it is locally common in
North Laos, at Ban Latsen in Xiangkhouang province;
Muang Xaisomboun; the Upper Lao Mekong; Nam Xam
NPA; Nam Et-Phou Louey NPAs, and Nam Ha NPA
(Tizard etal. 1997, Showier etal. 1998b, Davidson 1998,
Duckworth et al. 2002). It is not, however, simply a
northern or highland species: it was formerly common in
Bangkok (Round and Gardner in press) and inhabits Xe
Pian NPA’s extreme lowlands (Thewlis et al. 1996).
Understanding the Lao distribution is further complicated
by the previously unsuspected seasonality in the present
records: many fewer birds were seen, especially around
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
37
Phongsaly town, in March than in December. It is unclear
whether the birds left or simply became more elusive. The
species is believed sedentary in Hong Kong (Carey et al.
200 1 ), but Deignan (1945) found a distinct pattern on the
ChiangMai plain (northern Thailand), with birds absent
in early March-mid-July. He suspected movement to
higher ground, but this cannot bear on Phongsaly status.
It may never have been numerous in the province in spring:
in 1929 it was listed only for Ban Laophouchai and near
Phongsaly town (FMNH 80104), at c.800 m, by Bangs
and Van Tyne (1931). It has recently declined around
Bangkok (Round and Gardner in press), and has not been
recorded in Vientiane since 1995 (Duckworth etal. 1998a;
JWD unpublished data). Whatever factors drive the Thai
decline may operate in Laos, urging a review of historical
records and clarification of current status. Birds were
mostly in open secondary areas, with Grey-backed Shrike
in the taller, denser and more woody secondary growth.
[Indochinese Green Magpie Cissa hypoleuca
Potentially At Risk in Laos
Around Phongsaly town: Phou Fa, one, 28 November.
The observer (WGR) saw no black-and-white tertial
patterning, ruling out C. chinensis (frequent in Phongsaly
province: Appendix 1). However, the bird showed only
briefly and, given the great geographical and ecological
separation from Phongsaly to other known Lao records,
identification is provisional. Lao records before 1997 came
only from Champasak and Attapu provinces, but it was
later found north to the Nam Chat/Nam Phan Provincial
Protected Area in Bolikhamxai province, although very
locally and at lower densities (Dickinson 1970a,
Duckworth etal. 1999). Occurrence even in far northern
Laos is reasonable, because the species inhabits adjacent
China (Robson 2000).]
Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos
Phou Dendin NPA: two. Ban Pumouang, 19 March
1996; one, 3 hr walk east of Ban Hathin, 20 March, one
upstream of the Nam La mouth, 27 March, and two
singles and a duo, Ban Hathin-Ban Pusum, 28 March
1996. Duos, Ban Hathin and near Ban Sopkhang, 30
November; six, near Nam Ou camp #2 and two, near
HouayHin mouth, 1 December; five, upstream of Houay
Hin mouth, 2 December; three, upstream of the Nam
Hin, two near Hat Chan, and one near 22°03/N 1 0 1 °55'E
(GPS), 3 December. Two, downstream of Houay Hin,
one near Nam Ou camp #2, 4 December; five, Nam Ou
camp #2, 5 December; 1-2, Ban Sopkhang, 5-7
December; two, Ban Tatoung (Nam Khang), 6-7
December; eight, Ban Hathin, 7 December. Nam Khang,
Ban Tatoung-trailhead to Ban Soppha, 1 6 on 6
December, 1 3 on 9 December. At least four, Nam La, 1 0
December. Two, Ban Tan (well inland of the Nam Ou),
10 or 12 December. Three near Ban Siengnua (Nam
Houn), 1 1 December. Seven, Nam Ou, Ban Hatxa-Ban
Hathin, 1 7 March 2005; recorded Ban Hathin, 1 8 March;
one, Ban Sopkhang, 21 March 2005. Heard near Ban
Houangtaye, 22 March and Ban Laophouchai-Nam Va,
24 March 2005. Around Phongsaly town: five near
Ban Bakong (a highland area well away from any large
stream), 18 December. Other: two, Nam Ngay, Ban
Ngay-Nua-Ban Ngay-Tai, 26 March 1996. Along the
Nam Ou outside Phou Dendin NPA, one near Ban Hatxa,
14 March 1996, 1-2 nearby on 20 March 1996, two, 1 hr
journey upstream, 18 March 1996, and two groups of 1-
2, 2-3 hr downstream of Khoa, 30 March 1996. Two
downstream of the Nam Va mouth, 7 December; five,
Ban Sopong, three, Ban Hatkao, and three near Nam
Houn mouth, 11 December; five Ban Sopong, 13
December. Two far from the Nam Ou (near the Nam Li
permanent stream) near Ban Namli, 27 December. Much
less intensive observation in March 2005 found with up
to five on all four days along the Nam Ou, and singles near
Ban Houangtaye and the upper Nam Va. All sites are on/
near the Nam Ou except where stated.
Duckworth et al (1999) overlooked this crow as a key
species, yet, except in Phongsaly province, no viable
population is known in Laos north of the Pakxan-Nam
Ngum plain, following widespread declines; many
historical sources called the species common, even in
towns (Duckworth etal. 2002, Bezuijen 2006, C. Wood,
M. Hedemark and A. Johnson verbally 2005, JWD, WGR,
TT unpublished data). (Assessment as ‘common’ on the
Louang-Namtha plain in Tizardcru/. [1997] was an error,
and none was seen there in several months in 2005: TT
unpublished data). Across Laos, crows are among the
species most frequently mentioned when villagers are
asked which species ofwildlife have declined (T. E. Hansel
verbally 2004). Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) collected
one crow along the Nam Ou on 7 June 1929 (FMNH
78560), but as Coolidge and Roosevelt (1933) mentioned
a ‘flock of crows.. ..like a small black cloud’, some way
upstream of Khoa, it is safe to assume that they were
common. In surveyed parts of Phongsaly province in May
1 995, status resembled that in 2004: five singles between
Khoa and Ban Hatxa on 23 May, and small flocks of up
to four in Phou Dendin NPA, especially along the Nam
Ou (Duckworth et al. 1998a, WGR unpublished data).
Figures above give minima in winter 2004-2005 of 46
for the NPA Nam Ou and associated streams upstream
of Ban Hatxa, 14 for the stretch downstream to and up
the Nam Houn, five near Phongsaly town and two in the
far south of the province. Records along small rivers and
near interior villages suggest that many more birds live in
non-visited parts of the NPA, and, based on records away
from the Nam Ou, perhaps widely in the province. This
substantial population (in Lao terms) should not breed
complacency. Crows were discussed with villagers widely
in and around the NPA, and information is surely reliable :
no other species is confusable, crows are conspicuous,
apparently have a single unique Lao name ( nok ka ), and
are of economic interest (as a presumed fish, chick, or
crop thief). Informants were prompted to think about
status around forest rivers, not just villages, and all reported
major declines within living memory, some explicitly
stating that although crows are still regularly seen,
previously there were many more. Most suggested no
cause for decline, but a boatman attributed it to poisoning
by fishermen (through treated dead fish left by the Nam
Ou). Other villagers felt that such poisoning, certainly
occurring, could not be widespread or sustained enough
to drive such declines . Hmong informants in Ban T atoung
speculated upon a disease outbreak. Crows seen perched
and flying low right beside various villages, and remaining
unflushed close to passing boats, lent objective supporting
to villagers’ unanimous statements that they neither shot
nor ate crows (that crows eat carrion was a reason given
at least twice). The near-total loss of crows from urban
and agricultural habitats from North Laos happened before
38
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
1980 (Duckworth and Tizard 2003), so long ago as to
hamper meaningful discussions on causation with today’s
people away from Phongsaly. Until it is clear why
populations are so low, the possibility remains that the
factor (s) responsible is/are also impacting less visible species
of scavenger or predator.
Ashy WOODSWALLOW Artamus fuscus
Phou Dendin NPA: one, Ban Tan-Ban Tatoung, 24
March 1996; two, lower Nam Khang, 25 March 1996.
Singles, Nam Ou Ban Tan, 13 March 2005, and
downstream of Ban Hathin, on 27 March 2005. Around
Phongsaly town: three, Bakong trail, 19 March 2005.
Ashy Woodswallow was recorded near Phongsaly town
(FMNH 80072-80073) and at Ban Laophouchai (FMNH
80074) in April-May 1929 by Bangs and Van Tyne (1931),
and in Phou Dendin NPA in May 1995 (two near the
Nam La: Duckworth et al. 1998a). The lack of records in
November-December, despite specific searches and long
periods in suitable habitat, suggests the species is absent
in winter, and indeed Delacour and Jabouille (1931) stated
that it occurred in northern Indochina only in spring and
summer. The ‘resident’ status in Duckworth et al. ( 1 999)
and Robson (2000) is hence misleading, at least for some
Lao populations.
Short-billed Minivet Pericmcotus brevirostris
Nam Lan CA: a male and female near Ban Long Nay
Mai (c.740 m) on 15 May 2004.
Species identification was based on the wing-pattern
observed on the perched birds. This sighting is lower
than previously known in Laos (above 1,080 m;
Duckworth et al. 1999), reflecting records at 750 m in
Vietnam (Hill 2000).
Yellow-bellied Fantail Rhipidura hypoxantka
Phou Dendin NPA: one in a mixed-species flock, Ban
Sopkhang (c.5 1 0 m), 6 December. Common, Ban Tan-
Vietnamese border (c. 1400-1,600 m), 16-17 March
2005.
The previous lowest Lao record was only c. 1,700 m
(Duckworth etal. 2002) although Robson (2000) recorded
wintering birds in South-East Asia as low as 180 m, and
it is common at c.200 m in mid-winter in the Hukaung
Valley, Myanmar (JWD and TT unpublished data).
Asian Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone pamdisi
Phou Dendin NPA: singles, Ban T an-Ban T atoung, 24
March 1996; near Ban Hathin, 26 March 1996; Ban Tan-
Nam Ou, 1 8 March 2005; near Ban Sopkhang, 23 March
2005. Around Phongsaly town: Phou Fa, one, 23 May
2004. Nam Lan CA: two, Ban Naten, 1 0 May; one. Ban
Naten-Ban Boun-Tai, 13 May; singles, Ban Long Nay
Mai, 17,19 and 20 May, three, including a juvenile, Ban
Namaek, 29, 30 and 31 May 2004.
All May 2004 records and that on 23 March 2005
were T. p. indochinensis, which is assumed to be a breeding
visitor to North Laos, while T. p. incei was not listed for
the country (Robson 2000) . However, both were collected
by David-Beaulieu in September 1 938 in Xiangkhouang
province ( indochinensis : MNHN CG 1940-140 and
MNHNCG 1 940- 1 50; incei: MNHN CG 1940-141 and
1940-145 to 1940-149). All Phongsaly surveys in March-
September found the species (Bangs and VanTyne 1931,
Duckworth etal. 1998a; Appendix l),sothelackofrecords
in November-December, despite ample time in suitable
habitat, corroborates the winter emigration of T. p.
indochinensis from North Laos (David-Beaulieu 1944,
Robson 2000).
BROWN Dipper Cinclus pallasii Potentially At Risk in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: on the Nam Ou, singles near Ban
Pumouangon 19 March 1996, near the Nam Long mouth
on 28 March 1 996, downstream of the Nam Long mouth
on 30 November and upstream of Ban Pumouang on 19
March 2005. One on the Nam Pha, near Ban Soppha, on
7 December.
Recent Lao records of Brown Dipper come from six
survey areas, including Phou Dendin NPA (Thewlis etal.
1 998, who erroneously sited the 1 996 records outside the
NPA), but in only two was it common, and there only
locally so (Duckworth et al. 1999). This scarcity reflects
rarity in northern Thailand (Deignan 1945), although it
can be common in Vietnam at similar latitude (e.g. Vogel
et al. 2003) . Distribution in Phou Dendin NPA is localised,
with Nam Ou records being at similar sites in each year
(in 1995, there were singles along the lower Nam Khan
on 24 May and the lower Nam Long on 25 May: WGR
unpublished data) . The only records from the higher hills,
a single and a duo along the upper Nam La (upstream of
Ban Tan), on 27 May 1995 (WGR unpublished data)
come from the wettest survey month: possibly, dippers
leave the higher streams in the dry season.
Black-breasted Thrush Tardus dissimilis Little Known
in Laos
Around Phongsaly town: Phou Fa: at least one with
20-30 thrushes on 27 November, two with three
thrushes on 1 0 December, and one with another thrush
on 15 December; probably absent during the March
2005 survey. Phou Taleng: at least two with five
thrushes on 9 December; at least one on 21 December;
at least two on 22 December; probably present on
1 7 March 2005; at least three, probably nine or more, on
20 March 2005. Nam Lan CA: one, Ban Long Nay Mai,
5 March 2005.
These counts are minima: most thrushes are shy in
Laos, so only c.20% were identified to species. Many
Asian thrushes give a mutually similar seeih call; all
identified birds in December were Black-breasted
excepting two single Eyebrowed Thrushes and 1-2 Grey-
backed Thrushes. Many fewer were identified in March,
and whether Black-breasted was still the commonest is
unclear. No recent survey found Black-breasted Thrush
in an NPA, except for three probable records, Nakai-
Nam Theun NPA, November-December 1998
(Robichaud and Stuart 1999); most records were from
markets (Thewlis et al. 1998, Duckworth et al. 1999,
2002), including a single male in Oudomxai town in
February 2005 (C. Wood in litt. 2005). These records are
the only field evidence that the species is ever widespread
and numerous in Laos. Most Turdus that winter in
Thailand seem to be irregular and irruptive in occurrence
(Round 1983) and the same is presumably true in Laos,
so it is unclear whether the province is particularly suitable
for the species, or whether winter 2004-2005 simply
brought many birds to Laos. Robson (2000) thought that
it might breed in North Laos, but Bangs and Van Tyne
(1931), collecting in late April-early June, found none in
Laos, and the present surveys shed no light.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
39
Grey-winged Blackbird Turdus boulboul Little Known
in Laos
Around Phongsaly town: a male south-east of Ban
Maochaolouang (c. 1,300 m), 19 December.
The only previous Lao records are from two historical
localities and of a dead bird in a market in 2000, all in the
North (Delacour and Greenway 1940b, David-Beaulieu
1 944, Duckworth et al. 2002) . The present bird was seen
only in flight, when the wing patches looked white, not
the grey typical of this species. However, NHM specimens
vary in patch colour. Almost all have some white, and
one, an undated specimen from Darjeeling, India (NHM
81.5.1.794) is effectively all-white; two from Bhutan
(NHM 1939.1.17.480, November, and NHM
1933.1 1.16.598, July) are almost as pale.
LESSER Shortwing Brachypteryx leucophrys
(, Selected records only ) Nam Lan CA: one collected
(MHNG 1922.077) on 6 March 2005 near Ban Long
Nay Mai (c.740 m).
Duckworth etal. (1999) gave a lower altitude for Laos
of 1,000 m, but Deignan (1945) recorded it down to
c.350 m in northern Thailand, and considered it relatively
independent of altitude, if forest was suitable.
Brown-breasted Flycatcher Muscicapa muttui
Phou Dendin NPA: two mist-netted together near Ban
Sopkhang (c.560 m) on 22 March 2005, one collected
(MHNG 1933.015).
This is the first Lao record of this flycatcher, which
breeds in south-west China and W Tonkin (Vietnam)
generally at 1,220-1,645 m (Robson 2000).
Pale-chinned Flycatcher Cyomis poliogenys
Nam Lan CA: an adult mist-netted and photographed
near Ban Namaek on 31 May 2004.
This species, previously unrecorded in Laos, is resident
in Myanmar and south-west China. This individual’s
morphology corresponds with C. p. laurentei of south
Y unnan (La T ouche 1921): absence of grey on the head,
and a dull fulvous chin and upper throat.
PURPLE Cochoa Cochoa purpurea Little Known in Laos
Around Phongsaly town: a male, Phou Fa, 10
December.
The only previous Lao record is of nine freshly killed
birds in a North Lao market on 12 February 1999
(Duckworth et al. 2002) . This bird is notoriously difficult
to see (although this individual perched for many minutes
in the open mid-storey), hindering assessment of its actual
status in Phongsaly and indeed Laos.
PURPLE-BACKED STARLING Stumus stuminus
Other: a male at Ban Boun-Nua on 22 March 2005.
The only three previously published Laos records are
from the North (Duckworth et al. 2002 and references
therein), but it is much under-recorded: in Vientiane city
it is quite common on passage, especially in September
(DVG and JWD unpublished data).
Black-collared Starling Stumus nigricollis
Other: at least two downstream of Khoa on 30 March
1996.
One was collected by Bangs and Van Tyne (1931;
FMNH 80160) upstream of Khoa on 7 June 1929, but
the only other records from the province are provisional
identifications of groups of eight and two downstream of
Khoa on 5 June 1995 (WGR unpublished data). It is now
very localised across the Lao northern highlands (Tizard
et al. 1997, Showier et al. 1998b, Brooks and Sorensen
2001, Duckworth et al. 2002; TT unpublished data),
paralleling the status of Acridotheres mynas (see below).
COMMON Myna Acridotheres tristis
Other: two in Ban Boun-Tai on 25 May 2004 and 5
March 2005.
This myna is so scarce across the Lao northern
highlands, following steep decline (reviewed in Duckworth
et al. 2002) , that all records from there should be collated.
The only historical record from Phongsaly province is a
specimen from Ban Muangyo in mid-May 1 929, with no
comment on abundance (FMNH 80 1 59; Bangs and Van
Tyne 1931). In north Xaignabouli province in March
2004, Common Myna was quite widespread (Xaignabouli
town, Hongsa district town, Ngeun district town and
adjacent large villages, and Xienghon district town) and
in places quite common, but many non-forest birds
seemed more common than elsewhere in North Laos
(DVG unpublished data) . A few in Oudomxai town centre
in September 2003 contrasted with none elsewhere in the
province (DVG unpublished data). In Louangphabang
town in December 2003, DVG (unpublished data) , despite
heavy searching, found only one small group, which on
behaviour may have been escaped cagebirds. Seven there
on 24 November 2004, also the result of intensive
searching, seemed wild (JWD unpublished data). In
Louang-Namtha it is very scarce: TT (unpublished data)
in several months in 2005 found only a duo for a few
weeks in spring in Louang-Namtha town, and two in
Muang Sing.
White-vented Myna Acridotheres cinereus
Other: a caged bird in Ban Boun-Nua in December and
in March 2005. [Along the Nam Ou, at least twelve
downstream of Khoa, and four birds two hours’ further
downstream, on 30 March 1996; one myna sp. in this
reach on 20 March 1996; three on a buffalo, close to Ban
Noua, on 26 November.] Crested Myna A. cristatellus,
never recorded from North Laos (Robson 2000), but
known from adjacent Vietnam, in Muong Nhe Nature
Reserve (Nguyen Due Tu et al. 2001), was not excluded
from bracketed (i.e. provisional) identifications.
As elsewhere in North Laos, including where they were
historically common (see Duckworth etal. 2002), resident
non-forest sturnids are now rare in Phongsaly province:
the search for Asian Pied Starling in damp paddies and
grass around buffaloes covered just the habitats this myna
(and Black-collared Starling) uses in, e.g., Champasak
province. Historically, four White-vented Mynas were
collected at Ban Muangyo in mid-May 1929 (Bangs and
Van Tyne 1931), with one at Ban Sopnao in November
1931 (Dickinson 1970a); and there were five contacts of
1-3 birds (Crested Myna not ruled out) along the Nam
Ou between Khoa and the Nam Va mouth during 23-24
May 1995 (Duckworth et al. 1998a, WGR unpublished
data). The few recent Lao records significantly north of
Vientiane include a few in Bokeo and at Ban Latsen,
Xiangkhouang province (Duckworth et al. 2002), and one
caged in Louang-Namtha town in September 2003, but
with no wild-living mynas there (DVG unpublished data)
40
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
or in several months of 2005 (TT unpublished data). The
three largest non-forest sturnids have recently increased
rapidly in and around Vientiane city: during the 1990s,
White-vented Myna and Black-collared Starling were
absent, and Common Myna was scarce (Duckworth 1 996,
Thewlis et al. 1996, Duckworth et al. 1998a, DVG and
JWD unpublished data). These recently expanded
populations are far stronger than anywhere else visited in
North Laos (DVG, TT unpublished data), but similar
increases will presumably occur in Louangphabang and
other large northern towns. Any records of any of the
three species from the northern highlands warrant
documentation. As elsewhere in Laos (e.g. Thewlis et al.
1998), Hill Myna Gracula religiosa, a forest species,
persisted despite the loss of open-country mynas.
Chestnut-vented Nuthatch Sitta nagaensis Little
Known in Laos
Phou Dendin NPA: one in broadleaved evergreen forest
around Phou Namla (c. 1,500 m), 16 March 2005.
Although known from adjacent to Phongsaly in West
Tonkin, Vietnam (Robson 2000), the only previously
known Lao population is in Bolaven Plateau (South Laos)
pine forest (Duckworth et al. 1998a).
Fire-capped Tit Cephalopyrus flammiceps
Phou Taleng: a flock of 35 on 22 December.
The three previous Lao records come from the Mekong
in mid-winter (Delacour and Greenway 1940b,
Duckworth et al. 1 999, 2002), but this tit is more typical
of montane forest (Robson 2000) . This is by far the largest
flock recorded in Laos to date. (A listing for Phou Fa in
RobichaudandSounthala [1995] was in error: Duckworth
etal. [1999].)
Sand Martin Riparia riparia / Pale Martin Riparia
diluta
Other: over the Nam Ou, one, Ban Muangngoy, 25
November, and two downstream of the Nam Va mouth,
7 December.
Past ‘Sand Martin’ records from Laos rarely considered
Pale Martin. The Nam Ou birds seemed paler than Sand
Martins in Vientiane (rare in winter, but an abundant
passage migrant: Duckworth et al. 2002, JWD
unpublished data), but this is insufficient for identification
as Pale Martin (not yet known from Laos).
Plain Martin Riparia paludicola At Risk in Laos
Other: at least five on 30-31 March 1996 in a rugged
stretch of the middle Nam Ou.
The lack of Plain Martin records in 2004-2005,
especially on the November Nam Ou survey, begs
explanation. Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) reported the
species ‘common’ at Ban Muangyo in May 1929, yet we
found none there. In December 1999 many were found
along the Upper Lao Mekong (Duckworth et al. 2002),
indicating there is no winter absence from far-northern
Laos. The Nam Ou is narrower than the Mekong, but
much further north, in the Hukaung Valley, Myanmar,
Plain Martin is locally abundant over pools, agriculture
and fallows around rivers as narrow as 5 m in mid-winter
(JWD and TT unpublished data) . Further information is
needed, because the species has declined in South and
Central Laos (Thewlis etal. 1998), and may also be doing
so in the North.
Wire-tailed Swallow Himndo smithii Potentially At
Risk in Laos
Other: 14 along the Mekong between Louangphabang
and Pak-Ou, two between Pak-Ou and Ban Houayluang,
and two midway between this village and the mouth of
the Nam Likna; all on 25 November.
This restriction to the lower Nam Ou echoes that in
summer 1929 (Bangs andVanTyne 1931;FMNH78295-
78299) when it was noted only downstream of Ban
Thenkhen, c.35 km from the upstream-most record in
2004 (Appendix 1 ) . It disappears on the Mekong around
this latitude, too (Duckworth etal. 2002). Numbers along
the Nam Ou are insignificant compared with those further
south in Laos (see Thewlis et al. 1998).
Striated Swallow Himndo striolata
(. Selected records only) Phou Dendin NPA: a dozen, Ban
Tatoung, 6-7 December. Small numbers, Nam Pha and
Nam La, 6-12 December. Five, Ban Siengnua, 12
December. Other: locally abundant along the Nam Ou
downstream of Ban Muangngoy. Also at least one, and
probably fifty, along the Mekong between Louangphabang
and the mouth of the Nam Ou on 25 November.
These November-December birds resembled the large,
dark, heavy-flying race H. s. stanfordi, the widespread
presumed resident breeder of Laos and northern Thailand
(Robson 2005), often found by wide rivers near karst and
other rugged topography (JWD and TT unpublished data) .
JWD noted none of this taxon in March 2005, but visited
no suitable habitat. The many hundred birds of either this
species or Red-rumped Swallow H. daurica seen in March
2005 in and around Phongsaly town and at Ban Muangyo
(Appendix 1) were a different taxon. At a distance, they
looked and sounded like Red-rumped Swallows in Korea
(where only Red-rumped occurs: Robson 2000) and,
presumed to be this species, in and around Vientiane.
However, a few birds (in a flock of 240) studied at Ban
Boun-T ai market on 26 March 2005 lacked a rufous hind-
collar and so, on characters in Robson (2005), seem to be
a race of Striated Swallow, perhaps H. s. mayri, a winter
visitor to northern South-East Asia (Robson 2005), which
is extremely difficult to separate on field views from H.
daurica (Lynam et al. 2006: 207). TT also found birds in
March 1 996 to be widespread but to defy easy identification
compared with birds elsewhere in Laos. In-hand
examination is necessary for further resolution. A heavy
passage upstream along the Nam Ou on 29 March 1996
and a general northerly movement apparent on some days
in March 2005 suggested that some, at least, were on
migration. H. s. stanfordi was recorded from Phongsaly
town on 24 April 1929 (FMNH 78290) and the Nam Ou
downstream of Ban Muangngoy on 10 June 1929 (FMNH
78289) by Bangs and Van Tyne (1931; as H. d. striolata).
There seem to be no Lao specimens of H. s. mayri.
STRIATED Prinia Prinia criniger / Brown Prinia Prinia
polychroa
Phou Dendin NPA: one between the Phou Namla camp
andBanTan, 17 March 2005. Around Phongsaly town:
Bakong trail: one on 1 8 December, two on 23 December.
These two species look very similar; either would be
a major extension of known range. Striated Prinia is not
known from Indochina, although it inhabits adjacent
Myanmar (Robson 2000). Brown Prinia, common in
southern Indochina, is not known from North Laos,
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
41
excepting a provisional report from Vientiane (Duckworth
and Tizard 2003 and references therein) . In Laos at least,
it is strongly associated with deciduous dipterocarp forest,
mainly in the lowlands (Duckworth et al. 1999).
Chestnut-headed Tesia Tesia castaneocownata
Phou Dendin NPA: between Ban Tan and the
Vietnamese border, one on 23 March 1996, two singles
on 1 1 December and singles on 16-17 March 2005 (all
at 1,400-1,600 m).
The only other Lao records are a few sightings in 1 997
in Nam Ha NPA (Tizard et al. 1997, P. Davidson in litt.
2005, TT unpublished data) . All birds were seen well and
the observers were already familiar with this readily
identifiable species.
Arctic Warbler Phylloscopus borealis
Phou Dendin NPA: one, silent, not trapped, in Ban
Hathin on 26 March 2005.
This is an early date: the main passage in Hong Kong,
roughly at the same latitude, is during the first half of May
with regular April records; the earliest date ever is 30
March (Carey et al. 200 1 ) . A much smaller dataset suggests
a similar May peak in Vientiane (JWD unpublished data) .
There are occasional mid-winter records from nearby
lowlands, e.g. one in Hong Kong on 24-25 December
1987 (Carey et al. 2001) and two at Houay Nhang,
Vientiane, on 19 January 1993 (Thewlis et al. 1996), but
none from the Lao northern highlands.
Blyth’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus reguloides
(. Selected records only ) Phou Dendin NPA: one (MNHN
CG 2005-2674) collected on 20 March 2005 near Ban
Hathin. Nam Lan CA: two (MNHN CG 2005-2673
and CG 2005-2674) collected on 6 and 7 March 2005
near Ban Long Nay Mai.
There were many sight records assigned to Blyth’s
Leaf Warbler sensu Inskipp et al. (1996). The three
specimens were assigned by molecular analysis to
Phylloscopus goodsoni, sensu Olsson etal. (2005) who divided
the former ‘P. reguloides ’ into three species; their P. goodsoni
includes P. g. goodsoni of Hainan and P. g. fokiensis (of
East China) which share similar Cytochrome-b sequences.
Especially since these birds were taken in March, when
many taxa are moving, it should not be assumed that this
taxon predominated among ‘Blyth’s LeafWarblers’ found
on the surveys; on ranges hypothesised in Olsson et al.
(2005), much denser sampling is needed. Although Blyth’s
Leaf Warbler is very close morphologically to the newly
described Emei Leaf Warbler P. emeiensis , according to
Alstrom and Olsson ( 1 995), Emei Leaf Warbler was never
observed feeding ‘in the typical P. reguloides manner (the
latter often looks on the undersides of branches, frequently
hanging almost vertically head-down’. Only birds showing
this behaviour were identified during the current surveys
as Blyth’s Leaf Warbler sensu lato , but it remains unclear
which of the taxa distinguished by Olsson et al. (2005)
forage in this fashion.
Yellow-vented Warbler Phylloscopus cantator
Phou Dendin NPA: singles, BanTatoung, 7 December;
[near Ban Soppha, 8 December;] and near Ban Tan
(c. 800-900 m), 1 1 December.
One near Ban Hathin (Phou Dendin NPA) on 25
May 1995 was listed as provisional in Duckworth et al.
(1998a) and was omitted by Thewlis et al. (1998), but
there is no doubt over identification (Duckworth et al.
1999, WGR unpublished data). Anew taxon (now called
P. c. pemotus ) was described from a bird collected at Ban
Muangyo on 19 May 1929 (FMNH 7801 1; Bangs and
Van Tyne 1930). This date implied local breeding, as
suspected elsewhere in the northern highlands by
Davidson (1998), so it was surprising not to find the
species in March 1996 or 2005.
Grey-crowned Warbler Seicercus tephrocephalus
Alstrom and Olsson (1999) and Martens et al. (1999)
reclassified the nominal ‘golden-spectacled warbler 5.
burkii ’ into several species. Their divergent conclusions
caused confusion over identification, particularly as some
information in Robson (2000) is incorrect. Recent surveys
in Laos pre-dated these revisions, so the Lao distribution
of each segregated species remains poorly known (as for
the rest of South-East Asia). Ranges in Robson (2005),
somewhat speculative pending comprehensive review of
available data, suggest four species should occur in Laos:
Grey-crowned Warbler, Martens’s Warbler, Plain-tailed
Warbler 5. soror and Bianchi’s Warbler. Hence, these
birds were a focus of survey in mid-late December 2004
and in March 2005, but not, unfortunately, during the
river survey in December; hence there is too little
information to characterise status of different forms at
lower altitudes. Grey-crowned Warblers were identified
through a single but slightly rippling chrrrp call, lacking
the ‘clean’ sound of Martens’s Warbler, but otherwise
rather similar. In November-December, such birds were
common in scrub and occurred in forest, often at higher
altitudes. By March, they were markedly scarcer at the
survey sites, being recorded on only 2-3 observation days .
Records from lower areas included one along the lower
Nam Khang on 7 December, two singles in scrub around
Ban Boun-Nua on 23 December, one around Ban
Muangyo on 24 December, and one at Ban Dua on 25
December. They used both under- and mid-storey of
forest. Robson’s (2000) listing for North Laos was based
on a skin in the NHM from Nape, Bolikhamxai province,
in 1928; but A. omeiensis was not excluded from this
identification (C. R. Robson in litt. 2005). Based on calling
birds in 2004-2005, this is the common wintering form
of the Vientiane plain (JWD unpublished data). The
Kelley- Roosevelts’ three birds from Phongsaly on 24 April
were all assigned to this form by Bangs and Van Tyne
(1931), but this needs re-evaluation because it pre-dates
the discovery of Martens’s Warbler.
MARTENS’S Warbler Seicercus omeiensis
Birds were assigned in the field to Martens’s Warbler
based on call, a ‘clean’-sounding chip. Most records in
December, when it was recorded widely, came from
middle altitudes, but there were highland records at Phou
T aleng on 22 December and on Phou Fa on 28 November,
1 5 and 26 December. In March there were sight records
only from Phou T aleng, where it was more common than
it had been in winter. In addition, the Cytochrome-b
sequences of two collected specimens, MHNG 1 922.078
from Ban Long Nay Mai (Nam Lan CA) on 6 March
2005, and MNHN CG 2005-2677 from Ban Sopkhang
(Phou Dendin NPA) on 23 March 2005, were identical
to published sequences of Martens’s Warbler. Most birds
were within a few feet of the ground, and only rarely went
42
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
much above eye-level. Hence, they are presumably
susceptible to mist-netting compared with related species.
Historical records and specimens have not yet been fully
reviewed, and it is unclear if this hitherto unrecognised
form has previously been collected in Laos.
BlANCHl’S WARBLER Seicercus valentini
Bianchi’s Warblers were identified in the field through a
wistful-sounding hen note. A collected specimen (MNHN
CG 2005-2678; 19 March 2005, from Ban Hathin) had
Cytochrome-b sequence corresponding with published
data to 5. v. latouchei. Apart from the collected specimen
and one field record at Ban Sopkhang on 5 December, all
records came from high altitudes, as did the only other
recent Lao record, from Xiangkhouang (Duckworth et
al. 2002); but effort on this genus on the main lowland
survey, of the Phou Dendin rivers in December, was
minimal, so its true lowland status is unclear. Most birds
recorded were in forest rather than scrub, the single along
the Bakong trail being in a small wooded coombe. There
was no obvious difference in abundance or distribution
between December and March surveys. Most birds were
in the mid-storey, occasionally moving into the lower
canopy or taller bushes of the understorey. Historical
records and specimens have not yet been fully reviewed,
although there are at least two historical Lao specimens
(from Bokeo and Xiangkhouang provinces) in the NHM
(C. R. Robson in litt. 2000).
Striated Grassbird Megalurus palnstris
Ban Muangyo area: two together, Ban Dua, 25
December, in rank herbage and tall grass near the river;
two there, in subsong and in separate territories, 23 March
2005.
This species has an enigmatic Lao distribution.
Historically, it was collected only at Ban Muangyo and in
Xiangkhouang province (Delacour and Jabouille 1927,
Bangs and Van Tyne 1931, David-Beaulieu 1944,
Dickinson 1970a) and from an untraced locality
(d’Orleans 1894). It still inhabits both these upland areas
(Duckworth etal. 2002, these data). Other modern records
come from the Mekong bank in Vientiane town and in the
Pakxan wetlands during 1992-1995 (Thewlis etal. 1996,
Duckworth etal. 1998a), the Mekong plain of Sangthong
district in 1996 (Duckworth 1996) and the upland rank
grass of Xaisomboun in 1999 (Duckworth et al. 2002). It
has abandoned the Vientiane town site and probably
Pakxan (C. Wood verbally 2005, JWD unpublished data).
The lack of records from the Mekong and other wetlands
in South and Central Laos is surprising: the species
inhabits wetlands around Phnom Penh (Thomas and
Poole 2003) and Bangkok, where it has declined (Round
and Gardner in press). Its decline in Vientiane might
reflect only local habitat change, but a more extensive
factor (e.g. the widespread burning of grass in the late dry
season) cannot be excluded. In Nepal it is now rare
(assessed as Nationally endangered), threatened by loss
and degradation of habitat (Baral and Inskipp 2004).
HWAMEI Garrulax canorus
Phou Dendin NPA: one, lower Nam Ivhang, 25 March
1996. Around Phongsaly town: three, Khounsouk trail,
14 December; two groups totalling five birds, Bakong
trail, 18 December, at least one there, 23 December;
several groups there, 19 and 24 March 2005. At least one
near Ban Phagnexi, 19 December. At least one, trail to
the Nam Fan, 20 December.
Evidently common in the scrub, ruderals and coarse
grass around Phongsaly town, Hwamei was also recorded
from two sites in the province in April-May 1 929 (Bangs
and Van Tyne 1931). It is a much-sought cagebird,
recently added to Appendix II of the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), so
it seems prudent to collate all field records in Laos.
Streak-breasted Scimitar Babbler Pomatorhinus
mficollis
(. Selected records only ) A bird mist-netted near Ban Long
Nay Mai (Nam Lan CA) on 6 March 2005 in morphology
more resembled White-browed Scimitar Babbler
P. schisticeps than it did most Streak-breasted Scimitar
Babblers at MNHN (n=25), the exceptions being MNHN
CG 1940-921 (January 1939, Taloun, Louangphabang
province) and MNHN CG 1940-923 (Bokeo province).
The throat to belly lacked any streaks and were
particularly white by comparison with Streak-breasted
Scimitar Babblers from Xiangkhouang province,
Phongsaly province (Ban Muangyo; MNHN CG 1930-
167) and Tonkin. While the plumage thus resembles
White-browed, the red iris and the proportionate bill-
length fit Streak-breasted, and a hybrid cannot be ruled
out. Hence, the plumage-based identification of
White-browed Scimitar Babbler from Phou Dendin
NPA in May 1995 in Duckworth et al. (1998a) should be
modified to refer to this species-pair. Geographical
plumage variation in Indochina in these two scimitar
babblers, both with numerous races, is puzzling. The
mist-netted bird’s unstreaked underparts contrasted with
clear streaks on the Ban Muangyo bird and very heavy
streaking on specimens from Tonkin, while specimens
from Xiangkhouang province and Yunnan (China) are
not so streaked and show various amount of buff-grey on
the breast. Plumage varies even within a locality as
shown by specimens from Taloun, January 1939 (MNHN
CG 1940-921, 1940-924 and 1940-925), and also
apparent under field viewing in central Laos (Duckworth
et al. 1998a). Morphologically typical Streak-breasted
Scimitar Babblers were found widely during the 1996-
2005 surveys (Appendix 1) but too few were seen well
enough to assess the proportion lacking visible underpart
streaking.
[Slender-billed Scimitar Babbler Xiphirhynchus
superciliaris
Phou Dendin NPA: one, 15 March 2005, seen briefly
near the Phou Namla camp, at a grassy ridge with Alnus
nepalensis trees and bushes, surrounded by forest.
This would be the first record for Laos; the species
inhabits various adjacent areas (Robson 2000). The bird
perched on a horizontal branch of a low tree, with its body
to the observer’s side. Through binoculars at c.30 m range
was seen a dark passerine with a conspicuous long curved
bill. No other possible species fits this description, but
because the view was so brief, the record is kept
provisional.]
CUTIA Cutia nipalensis
Phou Dendin NPA: a group of four and a duo, Phou
Namla camp-Vietnam border (c. 1,500 m), 15 March
2005.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
43
This is the first recent record from North Laos,
although Cutia was recorded in Xiangkhouang province
by David-Beaulieu (1944; referring to a Delacour and
Greenway specimen, winter 1938-1939; MNHN CG
1 940-977), and recently from the high Annamites of South
and Central Laos (Timmins and Vongkhamheng 1996,
Evans and Timmins 1998). The lack of 1990s records
from the northern highlands in Tizard et al. (1997),
Showier etal. (1998b) and Davidson (1998, 1 999) is odd,
because surveys covered forest at suitable altitudes.
Chestnut-fronted Shrike Babbler Pteruthius
aenobarbus
(. Selected records only ) Phou Dendin NPA: one near Ban
Hathin (c.550 m) on 26 March 1996. Nam Lan CA: one
near Ban Long Nay Mai (c.740 m) on 7 March 2005.
This species generally occurs in Laos above 900 m,
locally down to 700 m (Duckworth et al. 1999).
BLACK-HEADED SlBIA Heterophasia melanoleuca
Around Phongsaly town: a flock of 4-6 near the summit
of Phou Fa, 14 September 2003; a captive in the town on
24 May 2004. Nam Lan CA: one near Ban Long Nay
Mai, 6 March 2005.
These are the first North Lao records of grey-backed
birds, sometimes separated as Black-headed Sibia H.
desgodinsi. Grey-backed forms are otherwise known in
Laos only from the Bolaven Plateau (Engelbach 1932,
Dickinson 1970a; H. m. engelbachi) and Phou Ahyon
(Timmins and Vongkhamheng 1996; presumably H. d.
kingi , Robson 2005), but occur north to central China
(Robson 2000), with//, m. tonkinensis in Tonkin (Robson
2000, Vogel et al. 2003). Previous North Lao records of
the complex came only from Nam Ha NPA, of a black-
backed form, ‘Dark-backed Sibia’ H. melanoleuca sensu
stricto (Tizard et al. 1997, Duckworth et al. 1999).
RUFOUS-BACKED Sibia Heterophasia annectans
0 Selected records only ) Nam Lan CA: one near Ban Long
Nay Mai (c.740 m) on 16 May 2004.
This bird usually lives above 1,000 m, although it
winters in north Myanmar down to 2 1 5 m (Robson 2000) .
Yellow- VENTED FLOWERPECKER Dicaeum chrysorrheum
(. Selected records only) Around Phongsaly town: one
south-east of Ban Maochaolouang (c. 1,300 m), 19
December.
This exceeds the upper altitudinal limits in Duckworth
etal. (1999; Laos) of 980 m, and Robson (2000; South-
East Asia) of 1,100 m, but a single non-breeding season
record means little.
Yellow-bellied Flowerpecker Dicaeum
melanoxanthum Little Known in Laos
Around Phongsaly town: a female in the Phou Fa Hotel
garden, all day, on 1 4 December; not found subsequently.
There are only three previous Lao records of this
species, all from the northern highlands, and including
occurrence in towns (David-Beaulieu 1948, Davidson
1998).
Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus
Nam Lan CA: recorded in Ban Naten on 1 2 May 2004,
daily in Ban Long Nay Mai on 17-21 May 2004 and 5—
8 March 2005, and Ban Namaek on 29-30 May 2004.
Around Phongsaly town; recorded in the town (no
information on numbers) on 23 May 2004. An
unidentified Passer on 16 March 2005. Other: two in
Ban Boun-Nua on 1 6 December; six on the same buildings
on 22 March 2005. Recorded in Ban Boun-Tai on 6, 1 5,
22 and 24 May 2004; 4-5, 13-14 and 26 March 2005.
Several, Ban Bouamphom, 26 March 2005.
This species’s rarity in eastern Phongsaly province
defies easy explanation. Phongsaly is by far the largest
Lao town visited by JWD or WGR lacking widespread
resident sparrows, the more surprising because tree
sparrows were collected there (FMNH 80382-80386)
and in Ban Muangyo (FMNH 80388-80398) in 1929
(Bangs and VanTyne 1931). Search effort was very high
in Phongsaly town and Ban Boun-Nua in December 2004
and March 2005, and high in Ban Muangyo (December)
and in Nam Ou villages (several, December, but only Ban
Hathin, March 2005). In late December and in March
2005, observers on car journeys looked hard for sparrows,
and found them only (and easily) in Ban Boun-Tai and
further south-west. The lack of records hence reveals
absence or extreme scarcity at these eastern sites during
December and March. The status difference between
west and east of the province does not reflect seasonal
movement, given the uneven distribution within March
2005; and young had fledged in Phongsaly town by 25
April 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), so birds must
have been present in March then. The upper altitudinal
limit of 1,350 m for Laos in Duckworth et al. (1999)
overlooked these Phongsaly town records. The sparrow¬
less Nam Ou villages lie well under 1 ,000 m, as does Ban
Muangyo, a large longstanding town amid paddies, in
which sparrows would certainly abound were they in or
south of Vientiane. Duckworth et al. (1999) stated that
the species is ‘not yet in many of the smaller and/or more
remote settlements’; while literally true, factors other than
village size and remoteness can evidently render a
settlement unsuitable.
White Wagtail Motacilla alba
Recent primary sources from Laos rarely separated White
Wagtail records to race, and specimens have not been
critically reviewed. Three forms were found on the surveys.
The scarcest form was ‘AL a. ocularis ’ (AL. a. lugens ,
rare in South-East Asia and scarce in Hong Kong [Carey
et al. 2001, Robson 2005] was not ruled out): two first-
winters at the Phou Fa Hotel, 27 November-1 5 December
and one there, 18 March 2005; two (one an adult) on a
town-centre roof, 10 December; one, Ban Muangyo, 22
March 2005 [one on a Nam Ou shingle bar near Ban
Hatxa, 26 November] . In Vientiane, this form is only a
passage migrant (JWD unpublished data), although it
winters at nearby Pakxan (C. Wood verbally 2005) and
in Hong Kong is more common in mid-winter than in
autumn (Carey et al. 2001); at all surveyed Lao sites it is
much scarcer than AL. a. leucopsis. Incontrastto Phongsaly,
Deignan (1945) considered it to avoid towns in northern
Thailand.
Along the Nam Ou and tributaries in Phou Dendin
NPA in late 2004, Al. a. alboides abounded. It was scarcer
downstream of Ban Hatxa, and on the Nam Houn was
much outnumbered by AL a. leucopsis. It occurred the
length of the Nam Ou and five were seen on 25 November
on the Mekong between Louangphabang and Pak-Ou. It
was not recorded in Phongsaly town, and there were only
44
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
two paddy records: an adult by the Nam Hoy (24
December) and a first-winter at Ban Dua (25 December).
Birds were usually in duos, and in December, at sites
where this race was outnumbered by M. a. leucopsis, mixed
duos, clearly interacting together, were seen often.
Breeding evidence throughout December included
females presenting to males, sexual chasing, and a bird
carrying apparent nest material on 7 December. The
species was common along the Nam Ou in March 2005,
with at least half the birds being M. a. alboides. In Laos
this race was formerly confounded (e.g. in Duckworth et
al. 1999) with Mekong Wagtail AL samveasnae. Pending
specimen review, the southernmost Lao record of Al a.
alboides is of a single on 5 January 2005 in Vientiane,
where it is very scarce (JWD unpublished data). The race
may be almost sedentary: it is unrecorded in Hong Kong
(Carey et al. 2001). WGR (in Duckworth et al. 1998a)
discovered the species breeding in Laos, along the Nam
Ou in May 1995, and identity as Al a. alboides is now
confirmed.
In late 2004, Al a. leucopsis was the most numerous
race on the Nam Ou south of Phou Dendin NPA, by
standing water (e.g. paddies) and slow streams (e.g. at
Ban Muangyo), and along the Nam Houn, even though
the latter essentially resembled the narrow upper Nam
Ou, where Al a. alboides greatly predominated. It was
present in all the Nam Ou and tributaries boated in Phou
Dendin NPA, but was scarce in the fastest-flowing parts.
A few used the same areas of Phongsaly town as ‘Al a.
ocularis ’. The few records in March 2005 (three singles at
Ban Muangyo on 22 March and several along the Nam
Ou on 1 2- 1 9 March) suggested that most wintering birds
had left by mid-March. This reflects the first birds
returning to northern Korea by mid-March with passage
almost over by early April (JWD unpublished data) . This
is by far the most numerous race on the Vientiane plain,
and probably in similar habitats throughout Laos
(Duckworth et al. 1999, JWD unpublished data). Some
birds with pale grey backs might have been Al. a. baicalensis ,
but back colour in Al. a. leucopsis varies with age and sex
(Deignan [1945] noted the great variation shown in
winter in Thailand) and there was no obvious
discontinuity, so identity of the pale grey-backed birds is
left open; Al. a. baicalensis has not been recorded from
Laos with certainty.
Citrine Wagtail Motacilla citreola
Ban Muangyo area: at least three, Ban Muangyo-Ban
Bomang, 22 March 2005. Other: two, Ban Boun-Nua,
25 December.
This is a regular visitor to the Mekong in Vientiane
and upstream, but these are only the second and third
‘inland’ Lao records (Thewlis et al. 1996, Duckworth et
al. 1998a, 1999, 2002, Duckworth and Tizard 2003).
Crested Bunting Melophus lathami
Phou Dendin NPA: two, Ban Tan-Vietnamese border,
22-23 March 1996. One or more near Ban Sopong, 21
March 2005. Around Phongsaly town: up to c.12 on
almost every visit to the Bakong trail, both December and
March 2005; in the latter month, song was at high levels
and at least one female was seen carrying nesting material .
[Probably heard on 19 December near Ban Khomen.]
Crested Bunting was collected in the breeding season
1929 at Ban Muangyo (FMNH 80399), at Phongsaly
town (FMNH 80403-80408, presumably around Ban
Khomen) and Ban Laophouchai (FMNH 8040 1 -80402;
Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). At two other historical
collection sites in Laos, the Nakai Plateau and
Xiangkhouang province, it has not recently been found,
despite extensive observations at appropriate season in
the former, and visits to the precise area, but not perhaps
in the same season, of the latter (Delacour 1929, David-
Beaulieu 1 944, Evans and Timmins 1 998, Duckworth et
al. 1998a, 2002). Oustalet’s (1898) assessment, as well
distributed in Xiangkhouang province and around
Louangphabang, seems not to be applicable today. The
other Lao historical localities (Taloun, east of
Louangphabang; and Lo-Tiao, Bokeo province: Delacour
and Greenway 1940b) have not been visited recently. It
was found on three surveys in the northern highlands
(Tizard et al. 1997, Davidson 1998, and these 1996
Phongsaly records) . It uses hill grass, ruderals and scrub,
which are widespread in Laos and may even be
expanding, but a clearer view of Lao conservation status
is merited: much of its habitat is burnt annually, and the
bunting was highly localised around Phongsaly, always
being found along one 2 km stretch of one trail but
almost never anywhere else. This spot had the most
extensive tall grass of any survey area of Phongsaly town,
and subsequent observations in the Hukaung Valley,
Myanmar, were all in stands of tall grass (JWD and TT
unpublished data). Tall grass is now very restricted on
the Nakai Plateau (R. J. Timmins in litt. 2006), suggesting
a cause for decline, but habitat information is limited for
other historical sites.
Tristram’s Bunting Emberiza tristrami
Phou Dendin NPA: [one, Nam Ou camp #2 on 4
December;] two near Ban Tan (c.620 m), 12 December.
Around Phongsaly town: [one, Phou Fa, 10 December;]
one, Bakong trail, 18 December; [two singles, Khomen
trail, 19 December],
These are the first recent Lao records; historical records
came only from Xiangkhouang province (David-Beaulieu
1944). It is often very skulking, and its tic call resembles
several congeners (including Little Bunting, common in
Phongsaly province); hence it may be somewhat
overlooked. Numbers fluctuate in the region (C. R. Robson
in litt. 2004); perhaps more than usual arrived in autumn
2004.
Notes on selected species not found
The lack of recent records of the following species is, or
may be, of conservation significance. Further surveys of
Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou should particularly
seek them.
Japanese Quail Cotumix japonica and Blue-breasted
QUAIL C. chinensis Little Known in Laos (both)
Both quails may have declined in Laos, perhaps greatly
(Duckworth et al. 2002, Duckworth and Tizard 2003,
Brickie et al. in prep.), so potential habitat was checked
when possible. Blue-breasted Quail was collected in
adjacent Vietnam (Mao Xao Phing, early April 1 929) by
Bangs and Van Tyne (1931). Buttonquails remain much
commoner than quails in Laos, and it was surprising not
to find Barred Buttonquail, which was collected in
Phongsaly in April-May 1929 (Bangs and Van Tyne
1931).
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
45
COTTON Pygmy-goose Nettapus coromandelianus At Risk
in Laos
A Cotton Pygmy-goose was collected at Ban Hatkham (?
upper or middle Nam Ou) in November 193 1 (Dickinson
1970a). The lack of recent records from the survey area
reflects a major national decline, especially in the North
(Duckworth et al. 1999). The only recent North Lao
records are of three on the Mekong in southern
Xaignabouli province on 2 October 2004, and one at
Nong Pen, Vientiane municipality, on 8 October 2004
(DVG, JWD and RE unpublished data). Possibly, the
species was only a passage migrant to the survey area, but
elsewhere in the northern highlands (e.g. Xiangkhouang:
David-Beaulieu 1944) it certainly has declined.
Stork-billed Kingfisher Halcyon capensis
Stork-billed Kingfisher is readily found from boats and
was recorded from three localities in the province and/or
along the Nam Ou in 1929 (FMNH 77907-77909; Bangs
and VanTyne 1931). The brief 1995 survey of Phongsaly
province, and extensive observations in 1 999-2000 along
the Upper Lao Mekong also failed to find the species in
historical localities (Duckworth et al. 1998a, 2002). The
only recent records from the northern highlands may be
those from the Nam Tha plain in Tizard et al. (1997),
where TT (unpublished data) again found the species
frequently in March 2005. Further south in Laos it has
also declined in the Nam Kading basin, where it was
locally frequent in 1995, but visits to the same reaches at
the same season in 2005 found no birds (Duckworth etal.
1 998a, Timmins and Robichaud 2005) . During the 1 990s,
it was widespread and locally common south ofVientiane
(Duckworth 1996, Thewlis et al. 1996, Davidson et al.
1997, Cunningham 1998, Duckworth etal. 1998a, Evans
and Timmins 1998, Round 1998, Evans et al. 2000a,
Evans 200 1 ) and it remains regularly present a little to the
north, at Ban Sivilai and the Nam Ngum reservoir (DVG
and JWD unpublished data). It has also declined greatly
in parts of India (Trivedi and Soni 2006)
Eurasian Cuckoo Cuculus canorus
A male and a female Eurasian Cuckoo were collected at
Ban Laophouchai on 21 April 1929 (FMNH 77804),
and ‘a number [were] heard calling in March and April
in. ..Laos’ (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). The only other
Lao information is David-Beaulieu’s ( 1 944) observations
in Xiangkhouang province: a male collected at Ban
Nonghet on 1 May 1940 with statement that in April-
May it sang commonly from the peaks of wooded hillocks
in this area, entirely deforested except for limestone hills,
but was very rare in the province away from this site. Ban
Nonghet has not been revisited, but Ban Laophouchai
was visited in late March 2005 and other deforested areas,
but perhaps not of precisely similar habitat, were covered
widely. The lack of recent Lao records may partly reflect
the fact that field separation of non-singing birds from
Oriental Cuckoo C. saturatus is almost impossible (there
are records of Eurasian/Oriental Cuckoos in, e.g., Thewlis
et al. 1996), but the substantial recent bird survey in the
northern highlands during the known song period suggests
that, as judged by David-Beaulieu (1944) for
Xiangkhouang, it is very localised in Laos, or it has declined.
Green Imperial Pigeon Ducula aenea At Risk in Laos
Four Green Imperial Pigeons were collected at Ban
Muangyo in 1929 (FMNHN 75317, FMNH 77715,
FMNH 77716, FMNH 408975; Bangs and Van Tyne
1931) and one at Ban Muangngoy in 1931 (Dickinson
1 970a). Ban Muangyo was covered well enough in 2004-
2005 to be sure this species has now disappeared, as it has
throughout most of North and Central Laos (Thewlis et
al. 1998) and much of Thailand (Lynam et al. 2006).
WOOD Snipe Gallinago nemoricola Globally Threatened:
Vulnerable; Little Known in Laos
Streams of Phou Dendin NPA potentially suitable for
this snipe were not navigable by boat: it needs thick cover
(Robson 2000), and banks in the boated stretches were
rather open. There were few survey records of Eurasian
Woodcock or Scaly Thrush, both seen readily from boats
on the Nakai Plateau’s shaded streams, the location of
the only recent Wood Snipe records in Laos (Duckworth
et al. 1998a), and both found by other means in Phou
Dendin NPA. Hence, this snipe could well have been
overlooked.
Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus
Red-wattled Lapwing formerly inhabited Ban Muangyo
and other parts of the province (FMNH 77644-77650;
Bangs and Van Tyne 1931). Previously common across
suitable habitat in North Laos, it is now very rare
(Duckworth etal. 2002; C. Wood, M. Hedemark and A.
Johnson verbally 2005, for additional areas). Habitat at
Ban Muangyo looks still suitable, and persecution no
doubt removed the species, as it evidently almost has
across North Laos. Fortunately, large populations remain
in (semi-)natural habitat of Central and, particularly,
South Laos (Duckworth et al. 2002).
Grey-headed Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga ichthyaetus
Globally Near Threatened; At Risk in Laos
This fish eagle is rarer in Laos than is Lesser Fish Eagle
(see above) . Historical assessments perhaps confused the
two (Thewlis etal. 1 998), and modern field guide pictures,
notably that in widest use in Laos during the 1990s
(Lekagul and Round 1991) under-emphasise the
prominence of the white ventral area in overhead adult
Lesser Fish Eagle. Observers new to the genus habitually
identify overhead adults as ‘Grey-headed’, unless/until
they see the upperside which allows easy separation.
Hence, perhaps, the various 1 990s Lao provisional Grey¬
headed Fish Eagle records in Thewlis et al. ( 1 998) . With
some overlap, Grey-headed inhabits standing and sluggish
wetlands of the level lowlands, with Lesser more on hill
rivers (Round 1998, Poole 2001). The Nam Ou’s rugged
nature fits our identification of all fish eagles as Lesser;
the provisional Grey-headed Fish Eagle records from the
Nam Ou (in Thewlis et al. 1 998) may have been in error.
Recent listing of Grey-headed Fish Eagle from adjacent
Vietnam, in Muong Nhe Nature Reserve, by Nguyen
DucTuera/. (2001) does not imply regular presence, and
historically only Lesser Fish Eagle was collected in that
region (e.g. Bangs and Van Tyne 1931).
Black Stork Ciconia nigra At Risk in Laos
Black Stork has not been recorded from Phongsaly
province, but the Kelley-Roosevelts’ Expedition visited
too late in spring to record this seasonal migrant.
Historically, it was a common winter visitor to far-northern
Laos (Delacour and Greenway 1940b), but there are few
46
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
recent records (Duckworth etal. 2002). The PhouDendin
Nam Ou and tributaries are North Laos’s biggest expanse
of prime Black Stork habitat (mid-width forest rivers with
many sandbars and other channel features, as shown by
observations in the Hukaung Valley, North Myanmar;
JWD and TT unpublished data). The lack of records
during the December river survey suggests that there is
no significant population, and it is likely that there is no
longer a regular wintering population in Laos away from
the tiny one on the Nakai Plateau (Duckworth era/. 2002).
Black-billed Magpie Pica pica Little Known in Laos
The only certain Lao record of Black-billed Magpie is
from Phongsaly town, a male on 26 April 1929 (FMNH
78547; Bangs and Van Tyne 1931), but there are other
suggestions of occurrence (Bingham and Thompson 1901,
Engelbach 1927, implicitly contradicted by Engelbach
1 932) . This conspicuous bird, with prominent, accessible
nest, must be very vulnerable to human interference, and
it may now be extinct in Laos. Similarly, in Vietnam it is
now very rare (J. C. Eames verbally 1998), although
formerly ‘very common’, occurring south to Cape Varella
(Delacour et al. 1 928) and ‘most common in Tonkin and
the greater part of Annam, but only on the plains... in the
parks, in Hanoi, they were very numerous’ (Delacour
and Jabouille 1925).
Asian Pied Starling Stumus contra Little Known in
Laos
Asian Pied Starling was historically recorded in Laos only
from the Mekong fringe of Bokeo (Delacour and
Greenway 1940b) and Ban Muangyo in mid-May 1929
(Bangs and Van Tyne 1931) where eight specimens were
collected (FMNH 80 125-80 131, MNHN CG 1930-178,
including two juveniles). Although recent surveys of Ban
Muangyo did not include May, the rarity of resident non¬
forest sturmds in the Lao northern highlands suggests
this species is extinct in Ban Muangyo. A recent search of
Bokeo found no birds (Duckworth et al. 2002). The only
recent Lao record is from Pakxan, where it was seen only
once in several years (C. Wood in litt. 2003), perhaps a
wandering flock from Thailand. Although in northern
Thailand, it was ‘one of the commonest birds in the
cultivated lowland districts of all the northern provinces’
(Deignan 1 945), it is now ‘very scarce’ there (Round and
Jukmongkol 2006).
Black-headed Munia Lonchura malacca Little Known
in Laos
A male Black-headed Munia from Ban Muangyo on 17
May 1929 (FMNH 80371, Bangs and Van Tyne 1931)
is the only certain Lao record up to 2006, but there are
other suggestions of occurrence (Engelbach 1927,
implicitly contradicted by Engelbach 1932, Duckworth
and Tizard 2003). It is unlikely that the species was
overlooked at Ban Muangyo in 2004-2005: calls are
distinctive and freely given, although more thorough
search, preferably in May, is needed to confirm current
status. Recent observations in Hukaung Valley, Myanmar,
were all in or beside tall grassland of seasonally
inundated plains, a habitat at Ban Muangyo all converted
to paddies. The munia no doubt disappeared with the
loss of this habitat. As the latter is now very limited in
Laos, the munia is probably exceedingly rare there; the
only recent record is from the artificial tall grass habitat
of a wetland margin at Nong Souy, Savannakhet province
(16°3LN 1 05° 1 2'E), where eight were found on 13 April
2007 (JWD unpublished data).
Three other non-forest species were not found for which
Phongsaly province is within their geographical range
and habitat seemed suitable: Daurian Redstart Phoenicurus
auroreus, Blue-fronted Redstart P. frontalis and Russet
Sparrow Passer rutilans. These also merit a national status
review and increased survey attention.
DISCUSSION
Bird communities of the surveyed areas
Rivers of Phou Dendin NPA
Phou Dendin NPA supported all four Globally Near
Threatened species found on the surveys. Two are strongly
associated with rivers: Blyth’s Kingfisher and Lesser Fish
Eagle; the latter’s population is of very high national, and
probably of high international, conservation significance.
Other key species of this habitat may now be locally extinct,
e.g. Black Stork, or have been overlooked, e.g. Wood
Snipe. The province’s Large-billed Crows, probably
centred on the NPA, form the only potentially viable
population known in Laos significantly north of Vientiane.
Numbers of common riverine birds were high, particularly
given the limited time on shaded rivers, and consequent
few records of Eurasian Woodcock, snipes and thrushes.
Sandpipers and plovers were unexpectedly scarce, and
the tiny population of River Lapwing surviving into the
mid- 1990s now seems to be extinct. Other than a flock of
60-80 green pigeons on 19 March 1996, the small
numbers of most treepies, hornbills and pigeons suggests
only low populations, presumably through hunting.
Among large aerial birds, only raptor numbers matched
those in other large evergreen forests in Indochina.
Phou Fa
Despite being only 200 ha, degraded, and close to a
provincial capital, Phou Fa held a few forest birds rarely
found in Laos, e.g. Black-breasted Thrush and Purple
Cochoa. Seasonal altitudinal movement seemed
substantial (see below). These findings no doubt stem
from the extensive secondary scrub and regenerating tree
cover linking to degraded forest several kilometres distant.
Forest birds mixed with open habitat species (e.g. various
bulbuls) through the ‘edge effect’, and Phou Taleng,
similar in topography and altitude, gives clues to what
Phou Fa has probably lost. There were still Mountain
Imperial Pigeons and Pin-tailed Green Pigeons around
Phongsaly town in 1929 (Bangs and VanTyne 1931), but
they have not been found recently.
Open habitats around Phongsaly town
The many species in the mosaic of scrub, ruderal, grass
and small-scale cultivation included none of obvious
conservation priority. These habitats cover large parts of
North Laos, and those few birds of conservation concern
in them are probably in decline through hunting pressure,
not habitat loss (although the effects of widespread burning
in the late dry season [ = breeding season] on nesting birds
remain unclear). The many guns and catapults around
the town mean that the common residents in this particular
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
47
area are doubtless among the most resilient species. Those
under wide national decline were also not found here, or
were very scarce: sturnids, quails, parakeets, Streptopelia
doves and Large-billed Crow. The almost total lack of
sparrows from Phongsaly town (and indeed from other
towns and villages of the eastern province) is unexplained.
These habitats did, however, provide records of various
species where the regular range only just extends south
into northernmost Laos.
Phou Taleng
Surveys were too short to characterise Phou Taleng’s
bird community. Winter status remained unclear through
low call and especially song levels, and even in March,
various forest species were only just returning or becoming
conspicuous. Hunting, although driving declines, has not
yet eradicated all susceptible species. Three species of
pigeons in December, in tiny groups (maximum two birds
for Ducula and Treron, and one for Macropygia) , had almost
disappeared by March 2005. Seasonal emigration may
have occurred, but hunting in the interim might simply
have killed off the birds. Among hornbills, only Oriental
Pied Hornbill was heard, and only once. Raptor numbers
seemed low. Galliform numbers, by contrast, were high,
with groups of Silver Pheasant, Red Junglefowl or
Arborophila partridges flushed every hour or two when
walking off-road in December. Crispy leaf-litter ruled
out silent passage in March, but many Grey Peacock
Pheasants, Bar-backed Partridges and some Red
Junglefowl were calling then. December and March bird-
lists were nowhere near complete: the last morning in
each month found 1 0-1 1 species ‘new’ for the respective
season. Woodpeckers, laughingthrushes, babblers
(notably wren babblers), tesias, pittas and shortwings
were all scarce or, more likely, under-recorded. Surveys
during April-June, lasting over a week, are needed to
inventory the area’s breeding community. Phou Taleng’s
forests, although only c. 1 00 km2, may be able to maintain
many species because they span 900-1,650 m, thus
allowing seasonal altitudinal movement by forest-
dependent species.
Valley bottoms around Ban Muangyo
Many historically recorded species have been lost.
Conversion of plains tall grassland may explain the lack
of Black-headed Munias and Jerdon’s Bushchats. Mid¬
winter egrets, resident raptors, rallids and Streptopelia
doves were very rare, and no quails, parakeets, resident
sturnids (notably Asian Pied Starling) or Large-billed
Crows were found at all; all are susceptible to off-take.
Oriental Pied and Brown Hornbills, Grey-headed
Parakeet, Green Imperial Pigeon and Red-wattled
Lapwing, all collected in 1929 here or nearby, are
presumably locally eradicated through hunting, as they
are across much of Laos. Bangs and Van Tyne (1931)
also recorded Thick-billed Green Pigeon, Cinnamon
Bittern, White-breasted Waterhen, Ruddy-breasted Crake
(nearby), Slaty-breasted Rail and Pheasant-tailed Jacana,
which may also have declined around Ban Muangyo, or
may simply occur only seasonally. Habitat suggests that
even species such as Green Peafowl Pavo muticus and
storks would formerly have occurred; all have shown huge
declines across Laos (Thewlis et al. 1998). These bottoms
are so small that these major losses are unsurprising. The
several interesting species recorded were noteworthy
through being scarce in Laos because the country is at the
edge of their range (Rosy Pipit, Eurasian Sparrowhawk).
It remains desirable to re-survey the area, and other
bottoms (e.g. BanBoun-TaiandBanBoun-Nua) in May,
for a better comparison of current with past bird
populations and a final effort to find Asian Pied Starling
and Black-headed Munia.
Nam Lan CA
Nam Lan CA had two pigeons (Ashy Wood Pigeon and
Pompadour Green Pigeon) in decline or little known in
Laos and very good numbers of Mountain Imperial
Pigeon. All are presumably heavily hunted in the area: at
least six gunshots were heard in one afternoon (11 March
2005) around the main pigeon (‘bat caves’) site. Fish
owls were the only river specialist found. Neither hornbills
nor parakeets were found, and while they may survive (as
heavily hunted birds, across Laos they tend to persist only
far from villages, yet surveys were all close to villages), it
can be in only very small numbers: the villages held no
captives or hunting trophies (by contrast, these were
obvious in Phou Dendin NPA villages). This probably
reflects the heavy collection (of adults and nestlings) and
small size (100 km2) of the conservation area. No non¬
forest sturnids or Large -billed Crows were found: these
are generally easily recorded if present, so absence of
records probably indicates their local extirpation. In
contrast, various other unrecorded species such as forest
corvids ( Dendrocitta and Cissa ) may simply have been
overlooked. The survey underestimates bird species
richness in Nam Lan CA because land above 750 m was
not visited, the observers were new to the region, and the
main aim was to collect tissue samples for genetic analysis,
with general bird surveys being incidental.
Nam Ou between Ban Hatxa and its mouth, Pak-Ou
The only birds of conservation significance downstream
of Ban Hatxa were a few Large-billed Crows. Habitat
suggests that River Lapwing and perhaps Great Thick-
knee Esacus recurvirostris and terns would have bred
formerly; heavy, widespread human activity has
eradicated them. Even small waders were scarce: visits
in March 1 996 and November 2004 combined gave only
one Charadrius plover, a single Little Ringed Plover
some hours’ downstream of Khoa on 30 March 1996.
Jerdon’s Bushchat is common in the adjacent Mekong,
occurring near Pak-Ou, but can be very difficult to find
in mid-winter (Thewlis et al. 1998, Duckworth et al.
2002); bushland in the Nam Ou itself may be too
restricted to support it, or it might have been overlooked.
The Nam Ou below Ban Hatxa, under current human
use, seemingly has negligible bird conservation
significance. Non-Palaearctic Peregrine Falcon and mid¬
winter Sand/Pale Martins are known by few other Lao
records, but may have been previously somewhat
overlooked. Species typical of rockier, faster streams,
Plumbeous Water Redstart, Slaty-backed Forktail and
Crested Kingfisher, were almost restricted to the stretch
upstream of Khoa.
Comparison of recent with historical records
Over 30 species found in 1929-1931 were not found
during 1995-2005 (Table 2). Understanding why they
were not may clarify conservation needs. For some species
the lack of recent records probably reflects genuine scarcity
48
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
but some plausibly may simply have been overlooked.
Germain’s Swiftlet, Grey Nightjar, Black-naped Oriole,
Vivid Niltava and two bush warbler species are all
difficult to distinguish under typical field conditions
from similar species; for most of these, unidentified
individuals that were potentially of the species were
found. Surveys may not have been seasonally apt for some
passage migrants (perhaps Grey Nightjar, Black Baza,
Dark-sided Flycatcher, Rusty-rumped Warbler, Yellow-
streaked Warbler, Yellow-breasted Bunting), wet-season
breeding visitors (Blue-winged Pitta and perhaps Black-
naped Oriole), or one or other (Chestnut-winged Cuckoo,
Slaty-breasted Rail, Ruddy-breasted Crake, Pheasant¬
tailed Jacana). Surveys in May in 1995 and 2004 did not
cover the wetland habitats favoured by some of these species
and involved inexperienced observers. Brown Wood Owl
and two pitta species are readily overlooked unless
specifically searched for. Black-tailed Crake is simply
difficult to find. Various species unrecorded recently are
probably ecologically quite restricted in the survey sites,
e.g. lower-altitude species such as Coppersmith Barbet,
and might be found by more extensive survey.
Large- and medium-bodied birds of open or edge
habitats are exposed to very heavy hunting. For Cotton
Pygmy-goose, Green Imperial Pigeon, Red-wattled
Lapwing and Asian Pied Starling, declines are well
established at a national or North Laos level (Thewlis et
al. 1998, Duckworth et al. 1999, 2002), although this is
only now becoming clear for Stork-billed Kingfisher and
Black-billed Magpie. Black-headed Muma has probably
declined through specific habitat loss.
Some species are difficult to categorise. Barred
Buttonquail is unlikely to have declined: it remains
common around Vientiane. Sighting rates vary strongly
with season although it is unclear whether through changes
in behaviour, microhabitat use or wider movements (JWD
unpublished data). Coppersmith Barbet has disappeared
from Vientiane (Duckworth and Tizard 2003), except as
an occasional post-breeding visitor (DVG unpublished
data) but remains so common in less-settled areas (e.g.
Duckworth 1996, Thewlis etal. 1996, Evans and Timmins
1 998, Evans et al. 2000a, Evans 200 1 ) that it is unlikely to
have been lost from Phongsaly (indeed, at Ban Muangyo,
a distant calling bird was probably this species) . The status
of Eurasian Cuckoo remains obscure in Laos (see above).
Jerdon’s Bushchat is ecologically odd in Laos (Duckworth
et al. 1999), with two breeding habitats: it is abundant in
seasonally inundated bushland of large river channels (but
upstream of Khoa the river does not expose sufficiently
large areas of bushland) but also breeds in mid- and high-
altitude scrub, and while more difficult to find (Duckworth
et al. 2002), it is strange that none was seen given the
extent of apparent suitable habitat and time spent in it.
The historical record (FMNHN 79645), from Ban
Muangyo, probably represented a third habitat-type, as
used in Thailand (Round 1988) and Hukaung valley,
Myanmar (JWD andTT pers. obs.): seasonally inundated
tall grass plains (also the predominant habitat of Black¬
headed Munia) . No such habitat remains at Muangyo. In
the absence of obvious threats to Crested Finchbill, it is
perhaps most likely that it was simply overlooked.
Seasonal differences at each site
Altitudinal migration is barely documented Laos. Four
visits to Phou Fa in late November and December 2004
characterised the conspicuous bird species present as very
different from those recorded during the hot months (May
and September, supplemented by May 1995
observations). Discounting inconspicuous species (e.g.
Lesser Shortwing) and long-distance migrants (e.g. Asian
Paradise-flycatcher), nine species found in May and/or
September were not present in the cold months: White-
browed Piculet, Lesser Yellownape, Crested Serpent
Eagle, White-throated Fantail, Black-naped Monarch,
[Hill] Blue Flycatcher, Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher,
Silver-eared Mesia and Black-headed Sibia. All except
Black-headed Sibia were found in the cold season at lower
altitudes. These nine species represent fully a third of the
26 ‘resident’ forest species recorded during May and
September. If this proportion is appropriate for the Lao
montane forest avifauna as a whole, retaining lower-
altitude forests is critical to prevent the decline of montane
breeding bird communities.
Observations in March 2005 found four of the
December absentees listed above (White-browed Piculet,
Black-naped Monarch, Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher
and Silver-eared Mesia) and (not recorded in November,
December, May or September) Oriental Honey-buzzard,
Great Tit and Buff-barred Warbler. Perhaps some
breeding species were yet to return (behaviourally, the
breeding season was only just starting for most species
present), while September-only species (e.g. Black-headed
Sibia) perhaps occur only as post-breeding dispersers. In
fact, the recorded ‘resident’ Phou Fa avifauna was poorer
in March than December, because Speckled Piculet (?),
Great Barbet, Long-tailed Broadbill (?), Orange-bellied
Leafbird, Maroon Oriole (?), Large Cuckooshrike (?),
Grey-eyed Bulbul, Yellow-bellied Warbler (?), Striated
Yuhina and Streaked Spiderhunter had all ‘gone’. With
only two March visits, sampling error might just account
for absences among species marked (?) above, but all
listed species were prominent enough in December for
their ‘absence’ in March to be striking; many other
(unlisted, above) ‘residents’ recorded (less frequently) in
December, but not in March, may also have left. Some
wintering birds gone ‘missing’ by March are widespread
highland forest breeders in the province and perhaps Phou
Fa, while at appropriate altitude, is too small and/or
degraded for them to breed. There may thus be a second
component of seasonal movement on Phou Fa, the arrival
of ‘resident’ species into lower-quality habitats in winter,
which leave the following spring to breed in larger blocks
of habitat, even if at similar altitude. And some winter
species may simply have been shot out by March, rather
than emigrated.
Phou Taleng, at similar altitude to Phou Fa, also
showed only limited similarity in ‘resident’ forest birds
recorded in the two seasons. Discounting seasonal callers
(e.g. Grey Peacock Pheasant, various cuckoos), Barred
Cuckoo Dove, Wedge-tailed Green Pigeon, Large
Cuckooshrike, Black-winged Cuckooshrike, Whiskered
Yuhina seemingly left the surveyed area between
December 2004 and March 2005, while White-browed
Piculet, Bronzed Drongo, Black-naped Monarch, Pale
Blue Flycatcher evidently arrived. Many more species
were recorded only at one season (Appendix 1), but not
often enough to distinguish genuine loss from sampling
effects.
Among ‘residents’ of scrub around Phongsaly town,
Speckled Piculet, Orange-bellied Leafbird, Bronzed
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
49
Drongo, Yellow-bellied Warbler and Little Spiderhunter
all ‘left’ between December 2004 and March 2005, while
Oriental Honey-buzzard and Great Tit ‘arrived’. As with
Phou T aleng, many further species were recorded in only
one season but with samples too small to conclude a
genuine status change. As with Phou Fa, departures may
reflect return to less degraded habitats for breeding, rather
than altitudinal movement.
Effective conservation planning for montane birds
demands accurate understanding of seasonal movements.
To disentangle the three effects of altitudinal movement,
expansion into degraded areas in winter, and death
through the winter, observations must cover a mix of
large and small forest blocks at several altitudes, and be
of sufficient intensity to characterise each site in each of
winter (December-January), the breeding season (May-
June) and the post-breeding dispersal (August-
September).
Conservation issues
The level plains that could support standing wetlands
and tall grassland have, given the province’s general
ruggedness, largely or totally been converted to
agriculture, and their specialist birds are probably the
most declined in the province. Despite such major
decreases, reflected across Laos, most non-forest birds
are of low international conservation significance, being
mostly widespread within and even outside South-East
Asia. By contrast, many forest species of Phongsaly have
restricted global ranges. The massive habitat loss in
Thailand, Vietnam and Yunnan province (China), means
that Laos holds many significant populations, now
threatened by ongoing habitat loss.
Birds throughout Laos are widely hunted as food, for
so many years that specific traps and methods have arisen
for even small species, both of forest (e.g. Large Niltava
Niltava grandis: David-Beaulieu 1944: 103) and open
areas (e.g. Barn Swallow: Evans et al. 2000b). Even so,
and even with the ready availability of firearms during
and after the war with America, there is no good evidence
for declines in closed-forest birds within remaining habitat,
except for hornbills and perhaps some pigeons and owls
(Thewlis et al. 1998, Duckworth et al 1999, 2002,
Brickie et al. in prep.), presumably because of the large
size of remaining habitat blocks. By contrast, only a few
hardy species (most obviously, Eurasian Tree Sparrow,
Common Tailorbird and Asian Palm Swift) persisted in
early 1990s Lao towns. In Vientiane and perhaps other
large towns of lowland south and central Laos, rapid
economic development has given children and youths
less time to roam around with catapults ready to fire at
any vertebrate within range, and there are now many
fewer guns in civilian hands. Hence, urban populations
of mynas, bulbuls, doves and raptors are expanding
rapidly (DVG and JWD unpublished data) . In Phongsaly
town, small groups with guns and catapults remain at
least a daily sight. The urban birdlife mostly comprises
winter migrants (e.g. White Wagtail, Blue Rock Thrush,
Yellow-browed Warbler), replenished each year, although
Barn Swallows and Common Tailorbirds survive. The
swallow is culturally protected: it nests in occupied village
houses, within easy rodding reach, but the birds and nests
are usually left unmolested, as seen in 1996-2005 in
villages of various ethnicity (although Ban Long Nay Mai
villagers had caught three swallows inside a house). The
proximity of Phou Fa and the large expanse of scrub,
ruderals and other uncultivated land, with their diverse
avifauna could allow rapid repopulation of Phongsaly
town by birds, in a way unknown in the lowland towns,
surrounded as they are by paddies. More damaging than
shooting and catapulting (which can be avoided
behaviourally by animals, particularly in forest) are snaring
and other forms of trapping. Levels were not assessed at
the survey sites.
Shots were heard many times each December morning
at Phou Taleng and in the non-forest habitats some way
out of Phongsaly town, rather less often in March, and
species taken largely through shooting (e.g. hornbills,
pigeons) were very scarce at all survey sites (especially
Phou Taleng) except perhaps in Nam Lan CA. Ground¬
dwelling gamebirds vulnerable to snaring remain
common: the many hunters’ piles of plucked feathers in
Phou Taleng were nearly all of species readily shot
(bulbuls, treepies, pigeons, drongos etc.); only one (a
partridge) was of a species typically snared. Snaring might
be less predominant in Phongsaly’s forests than elsewhere
in Laos.
Captive birds (T able 3) were in proportionately fewer
houses in Phongsaly town than in Vientiane, but
unconcealed individuals of large, protected species such
as Mountain Hawk Eagle (and even Asian Black Bear
Ursus thibetanus) suggest little current compulsion to
comply with national laws. Sporadic checks on Phongsaly
main market showed only several Great Barbets (Y.
Varelides verbally 2004, A. Hassamn verbally 2004) in
December 2004 and several roasted medium-sized birds
(including owls) and a Bar-backed Partridge in March
2005. No wildlife was seen on several visits to Ban Hatxa
quay. Whether this indicates low volumes of trade, or
that wildlife markets do exist but were not found (they
may be covert) is unclear.
Conservation survey needs
The following are roughly prioritised according to likely
conservation significance of findings to enhance
understanding of the province’s potential role in national-
level bird conservation needs. Equivalent or greater
priorities may exist in parts of the province not yet
surveyed.
• Survey of shaded forest rivers, notably in Phou Dendin
NPA, in both winter (notably for Wood Snipe) and
breeding season (for fish eagles and Blyth’s Kingfisher) .
Stretches 2-30 m wide, with little-degraded fringing
forest, and relatively inaccessible by boat (through
rapids) are the highest priorities.
• Survey of forests and high-altitude grasslands of Phou
Dendin NPA, in winter and the breeding season. In
the context of heavy forest loss in neighbouring
countries, Phou Dendin NPA no doubt retains
important populations of many species, especially given
its large size and ecological contiguity from lowlands
to peaks. Specific survey targets include quails.
Common Pheasant, Rufous-necked Hornbill, Blyth’s
and Ruddy Kingfishers, large owls, wood pigeons,
Little Cuckoo Dove, green pigeons. Black-tailed
Crake, Blue-fronted Robin Cinclidiumfrontale , Purple
Cochoa, White-tailed Nuthatch Sitta himalayensis,
Yellow-billed Nuthatch S’, solangiae , Brown-throated
Treecreeper Certhia discolor and various
laughingthrushes and babblers.
50
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
• Searches across the province for quails, Common
Hoopoe (breeding), Green Imperial Pigeon, Red-
wattled Lapwing, Black-billed Magpie, Large-billed
Crow, resident non-forest sturnids, Russet Sparrow,
Red Avadavat Amandava amandava , Black-headed
Munia and weavers Ploceus. Survey should focus on
any plains and valley bottoms which retain (semi-)
natural non-forest habitat or traditional agricultural
practices. No species is of global significance. Red
Avadavat, not yet recorded from Laos, is listed because
it occurs in adjacent Vietnam, in Muong Nhe Nature
Reserve (Nguyen Due Tu et al. 2001); it has declined
steeply in Indochina and northern Thailand (C. M.
Poole, P. D. Round verbally 2003).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many people helped the 2003-2005 surveys. Firstly, we thank the
Phongsaly Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office (notably Boualeuy
Inthava, head of PAFO, and Khamouan Xayyavong, head of Forests)
for inviting us, and the EU Phongsaly Forest Conservation and Rural
Development Project (especially Chris Hatten, Visara Bouppha, Richard
Humphrey and Yiannis Varelides) for facilitating and funding us.
Somephanh Xaythany, Viengsack Phommasy, Khamthai
Khammavongsa and Khamdeng Onmavong provided field support and
guidance. Sisay Chounnavanh, Pete Davidson, Olivier Ducourtieux,
T om Evans, John Fellowes, T roy Hansel, Michael Hedemark, Alexandre
Hassanm, Jesper Hornskov, Arlyne Johnson, Darrin Lunde, Divya
Mudappa, Urban Olsson, John Parr, Michael Poulsen, T. R. Shankar
Raman, Craig Robson, Philip Round, Gerry Schroering, Rob Steinmetz,
Paul Sweet, Rob Timmins, Jack T ordoff and Chris Wood all shared their
knowledge of Phongsaly and/or Indochinese birds and habitats. Per
Alstrom helped with molecular identification of Phylloscopus warblers.
Tim Inskipp’s draft bibliography of the birds of Indochina (Inskipp and
Mlikovsky in prep.) was invaluable in tracing previous bird records from
the province. The Phongsaly District Development Project (PDDP)
provided information on sites, co-ordinates and altitudes of villages. We
also thank Annemarie Ohler, Francois Bouvier and Eric Pasquet of the
Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle for assistance and advice, and
Ronan Kirsch and Manuel Ruedi for help during the March 2005 survey.
JF thanks the Societe des Amis du Museum and AC the G. and A. Claraz
Fundation (Switzerland) for funding fieldwork in March 2005. WGR’s
academic supervisor at the University of British Columbia, A. R. E.
Sinclair, offered him sufficient flexibility to participate in the 2004-2005
survey. The 1996 visit was funded through the Wildlife Conservation
Society Lao Programme, under a Memorandum of Understanding with
the Centre for Protected Areas and Watershed Management of the Lao
Department of Forestry . We particularly thank staff of both organisations,
Boualeuy Inthava in Phongsaly province, and our colleagues Boonhom
Sounthala and Chanthavy Vongkhamheng.
REFERENCES
Alstrom, P. and Olsson, U. (1995) Anew species of Phylloscopus warbler
from Sichuan province, China. Ibis 137: 459-468.
Alstrom, P. and Olsson, U. (1999) The golden-spectacled warbler: a
complex of sibling species, including a previously undescribed
species. Ibis 141: 545-568.
Bangs, O. and Van Tyne, J. (1930) Descriptions of five new Indo-
Chinese birds. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. fZooI. Ser.J 18: 1-4.
Bangs, O. and Van Tyne, J. (1931) Birds of the Kelley-Roosevelts
expedition to French Indochina. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.
Ser.) 18: 33-119.
Baptista, L., Trail, P. W. and Horblit, H. M. (1997) Family Columbidae
(pigeons and doves). Pp. 60-245 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J.
Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Volume 4: sandgrouse
to cuckoos. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Baral, H. S. and Inskipp, C. (2004) The state of Nepal’s birds 2004.
Kathmandu: Department of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation, Bird Conservation Nepal and IUCN Nepal.
Berkmiiller, K., Evans, T., Timmins, R. and Vongphet, V. (1995a)
Recent advances in nature conservation in the Lao PDR. Oryx 29:
253-260.
Berkmiiller, K., Southammakoth, S. and Vongphet, V. (1995b) Protected
areas system planning and management in Lao PDR: status report to
mid-1995. Vientiane: unpubl. report to Lao-Swedish Forestry Co¬
operation Programme.
Bezuijen, M. R. (2006) Incidental wetland bird observations from Attapu
and Savannakhet provinces, Lao PDR, March-June 2005 . Forktail
22: 49-56.
Bingham, C. T. and Thompson, H. N. (1901, for 1900) On the birds
collected and observed in the Southern Shan States of Upper Burma.
J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal 69 (2): 102-141.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
Brickie, N. W.,Tordoff, A. W., Timmins, R. J., Poole, C. M., McGowan,
P. J. K. and Duckworth, J. W. in prep. A conservation status review
of galliforms in Indochina.
Brooks, T. and Sorensen, L. (2001) Birdwatchingin Houaphanh province,
Laos, October 2000. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thai. Bull. 18(3): 13-15.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Birdwatching Society.
Committee for Planning and Investement 2006. National Socio-Economic
Development Plan 2006-2010. Vientiane: Committee for Planning
and Investment.
Coolidge, H. J. and Roosevelt, T. (1933) The three kingdoms of Indo
China. New York, U.S.A: Crowell.
Cunningham, P. (1998) Khone island bird observation report.
Unpublished.
David-Beaulieu, A. (1944) Les oiseaux du Tranninh. Hanoi: Universite
Indochinoise.
David-Beaulieu, A. (1948) Notes sur quelques oiseaux nouveaux pour
le Tranninh et meme pour l’lndochine. Oiseau & R.f.O. 18: 133-
MO.
Davidson, P., ed. (1998) A ivildlife and habitat survey of Nam Et and
Phou Loeuy NBCAs, Houaphanh province, Lao PDR. Vientiane:
CPAWM/WCS.
Davidson, P., ed. (1999) A wildlife and habitat survey of Nam Et and
Phou Loeuy NBCAs, Houaphanh province, Lao PDR: addendum.
Vientiane: CPAWM/WCS.
Davidson, P., Robichaud, W. G., Tizard, R. J., Vongkhamheng, C.
and Wolstencroft, J. (1997) A wildlife and habitat survey of Dong
Ampham NBCA and Phou Kathong proposed NBCA, Attapu province,
Lao PDR. Vientiane: CPAWM/WCS.
Deignan, H. G. (1945) The birds of Northern Thailand. United States
Natl Mus. Bull. 186: 1-616.
Delacour, J. ( 1 929) On the birds collected during the fourth expedition
to French Indo-china. Ibis (12)5: 193-220, 403-429.
Delacour, J. and Greenway, J. C. ( 1 940a) Vile expedition omithologique
en Indochine franfaise: itineraire. Oiseau & R.f.O. 10: 3-24.
Delacour, J. and Greenway, J. C. (1940b) Liste des oiseaux receuillis
dans la province du Haut-Mekong et le royaume de Luang-Prabang.
Oiseau & R.f.O. 10:25-59.
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1925) On the birds of Quangtri, Central
Annam; with notes on others from other parts of French Indo
China. Ibis (12)1: 209-260.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
51
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1927) Recherches omithologiques dam les
provinces du Tranninh (Laos), de Thua-Thien etdeKontoum (Annam)
et quelques autres regions de I’lndochine frangaise. Paris: Societe
Nationale d’Acclimatation de France (Archives d’Histoire
Naturelle).
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1 93 1) Les oiseaux de I’lndochine frangaise,
Vol. IV. Paris: Exposition Coloniale Internationale.
Delacour, J., Jabouille, P. andLowe, W. P. (1928) On the birds collected
during the third expedition to French Indo-china. Ibis (12)4: 23-
51, 285-317.
Dickinson, E. C . ( 1 970a) Birds of the Legendre Indochina expedition
1931-1932. Amer. Mas. Novit. 2423: 1-17.
Dickinson, E. C. (1970b) Notes upon a collection of birds from
Indochina. Ibis 112: 481-487.
Dickinson, E. C. (1973) A study of the orange-breasted niltavas
represented on mainland South-East Asia. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam
Soc. 24: 409-430.
Dickinson, E. C., Rasmussen, P. C., Round, P. D. and Rozendaal, F.
G. (2000) A review of the Russet Bush-Warbler Bradypterus
seebohmi, (Ogilvie-Grant, 1895). Zool. Verhand. 331: 11-64.
Duckworth, J. W. ( 1 996) Bird and mammal records from the Sangthong
district, Vientiane municipality, Laos, in 1996. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam
Soc. 44: 217-242 (including errata published in 46: 210-21 1).
Duckworth, J. W. (2000) A clutch of published distribution-map errors
concerning birds in Laos. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 32: 50-52.
Duckworth, J. W. (2006) Six bird species new to Laos. Forktail 22:
147-151.
Duckworth, J. W. and Tizard, R. J. (2003) W. W. Thomas’s bird
records from Laos, principally Vientiane, 1966-1968 and 1981-
1983. Forktail 19: 63-84.
Duckworth, J. W., Evans, T. D., Robichaud, W. G., Thewlis, R. M.,
Timmins, R. J. and Tizard, R. J. (1998a) Bird records from Laos,
October 1994-August 1995. Forktail 13: 33-68 (including errata
sheet distributed with Forktail 14).
Duckworth, J. W., Timmins, R. J. and Evans, T. D. (1998b) The
conservation status of the River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii in
southern Laos. Biol. Conserv. 84: 215-222.
Duckworth, J. W., Salter, R.E. and Khounboline, K. (compilers) (1999)
Wildlife in Lao PD R: 1999 status report. Vientiane: IUCN-The World
Conservation Union / Wildlife Conservation Society / Centre for
Protected Areas and Watershed Management.
Duckworth, J. W., Davidson, P., Evans, T. D., Round, P. D. and
Timmins, R. J. (2002) Bird records from Laos, principally the
upper Lao/Thai Mekong and Xiangkhouang province, in 1998-
2000. Forktail 18: 1 1-44.
Engelbach, P. (1927) Une collection d’oiseaux du Bas Laos. Bull. Soc.
Zool. France 52: 239-250.
Engelbach, P. (1932) Les oiseaux du Laos meridional. Oiseau & R.f.O.
2: 439-498.
Evans, T. D. (2001) Ornithological records from Savannakhet province,
Lao PDR, January-July 1997. Forktail 17: 21-28.
Evans, T. D. and Timmins, R. J. (1998) Records of birds from Laos
during January-July 1994. Forktail 13: 69-96.
Evans, T. D., Towll, H. C., Timmins, R. J., Thewlis, R. M., Stones,
A. J., Robichaud, W. G. and Barzen, J. (2000a) Ornithological
records from the lowlands of Southern Laos during December
1 995-September 1 996, including areas on the Thai and Cambodian
borders. Forktail 16: 29-52.
Evans, T. D., Watson, L. G. and Duckworth, J. W. (2000b) Large-
scale swallow trapping in Xiangkhouang province, North Laos.
Oriental Bird Club Bull. 32: 59-62.
Eve, R. (1990) Que signifie la curieuse parade du Fauconnet a collier
Microhierax caerulescensl Terre et Vie 45: 289-293.
Hill, M. (2000) Bird fauna of two protected forests in northern Vietnam .
Forktail 16: 5-14.
Inskipp, T. P. and Mlikovsky, J. (in prep.) Annotated checklist and
bibliography of the birds of Indochina.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
La Touche, J. D. D. (1921) Description of new species and subspecies
from S.E. Yunnan. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 42: 13-28.
Lekagul, B. and Round, P. D. (1991 ) A guide to the birds of Thailand.
Bangkok: Saha Karn Bhaet.
Lynam, A. J., Round, P. D. and Brockelman, W. Y. (2006)
Status of birds and large mammals in Thailand’s Dong
Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex . Bangkok: Wildlife Conservation
Society and Biodiversity Research and Training (BRT)
Programme.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Martens, J. and Eck, S. ( 1 995) Towards an ornithology of the Himalayas:
systematics, ecology and vocalisations of Nepal birds. Bonn. Zool.
Monog. 38.
Martens, J., Eck, S., Packert, M. and Sun, Y.-H. (1999) The golden-
spectacled warbler Seicercus burkii-a species swarm (Aves:
Passeriformes: Sylviidae). Zool. Abhand. Staat. Mus. Tierk. Dresden
50: 281-327.
McGowan, P. (2002) The conservation implications of the hunting
of Galliformes and the collection of their eggs. Pp. 85-93 in
S. A. Mainka and M. Trivedi, eds. Links between biodiversity
conservation, livelihood and food security: the sustainable use of
wild species for meat. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK,:
IUCN.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1934) Zoological results of the third de
Schauensee Siamese expedition, part II. -Birds from Siam and the
southern Shan states. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 86: 165-
280.
Nguyen DucTu, Le TrongTrai and Le Van Cham (2001) A rapid field
survey of Muong Nhe Nature Reserve, Lai Chau province, Vietnam.
Hanoi: BirdLife International Vietnam Programme (Conservation
Report 26).
d’Orleans, H.-P. (1894) Autour du Tonkin. Appendice: collections
d’histoire naturelle: oiseaux (pp. 622-630). Paris: Calmann
Levy.
Olsson, U., Alstrom, P, Ericson, P. G. P. and Sundberg, P. (2005)
Non-monophyletic taxa and cryptic species-evidence from a
molecular phylogeny of leaf-warblers ( Phylloscopus , Aves). Mol.
Phylog. Evol. 36: 261-271.
Osgood, W. H. ( 1932) Mammals of the Kelley- Roosevelts and Delacour
Asiatic expeditions. Pub/. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool. Ser.) 18: 193-
339.
Oustalet, E. (1898) Catalogue des oiseaux recueillis par M. le Comte
de Barthelemy dans le cours de son dernier voyage en Indochme.
Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris 4: 1 1-19.
Pain, D. J., Cunningham, A. A., Donald, P. F., Duckworth, J. W.,
Houston, D. C., Katzner, T., Parry-Jones, J., Poole, C., Prakash,
V., Round, P. and Timmins R. (2003) Causes and effects of
temporospatial declines of Gyps vultures in Asia. Conserv. Biol. 17:
661-671.
Parr, J. and Parr, M. (1998) Cooperative management of a wetland in
central Lao P.D.R.-Nong Bo. Tigerpaper 25(4): 5-8.
Pasquet, E. (1997) Oiseaux, Pp. 1-4 in Rapport Museum NHNP-
Forespace avril 1997. Unpublished draft.
Poole, C. M. (2001) Birds of Cambodia. Pp 109-131 in Smith, J. D.
(edj. Biodiversity, the life of Cambodia. Cambodia biodiversity status
report. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Biodiversity Enabling Activity,
Food and Agriculture Organization.
Ripley, S. D. (1953) Notes sur les oiseaux du Laos. Oiseau & R.f.O. 23:
89-92.
52
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Robichaud, W. G. and Sounthala, B. (1995) Apreliminary wildlife and
habitat survey of Phou Dendin NBCA, Phongsali. Vientiane:
unpublished report by Cedar Grove Ornithological Research
Station, Inc., to the Department of Forestry of Laos.
Robichaud, W. and Stuart, B. L. ( 1 999) Summary of Saola, herpetological
and wildlife trade studies in Nakai-Nam Theun NBCA and the
proposed Nam Theun Extension. Vientiane: unpublished report by
WCS to IUCN.
Robichaud, W., Marsh, C. W., Southammakoth, S. and
Khounthikoumanne, S. (2001) Review of the National Protected. Area
System in Lao PDR. Vientiane: Lao-Swedish Forestry Programme.
Robson, C. (1997) From the field: Laos. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 26:
60-66.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C . (2005) New Holland field guide to the birds of South-East Asia.
London: New Holland.
Round, P. D. (1983) Five bird species new for Thailand. Bull. Brit.
Orn. Club 103: 77-79.
Round, P . D . ( 1 984) The status and conservation of the bird community
in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, north-west Thailand. Nat. Hist.
Bull. Siam Soc. 32: 21-46.
Round, P. D. (1988) Resident forest birds in Thailand. Cambridge, U.K.:
International Council for Bird Preservation (Monograph 2).
Round, P. D. (1998) Wildlife, habitats and priorities for conservation in
Dong Khanthung proposed National Biodiversity Conservation Area,
Champasak province, Lao PDR. Vientiane: WCS/CPAWM.
Round, P. D. (2000) Field checklist of Thai birds. Bangkok: Bird
Conservation Society of Thailand.
Round, P. D. and Gardner, D. (in press) Birds of the Bangkok area.
Bangkok: White Lotus.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol, R. (2006) Recent report: September to
early November 2006. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thai. Bull. 23 (12): 12-20.
Salter, R. E. (1992) Notes on a reconnaissance survey of the proposed
Phou Dene Dinh protected area (PPA 9), 5-12 March 1 992, with
a summary of information received on the proposed Nam Rhang
area (PPA23). Vientiane: unpubl. report to Lao-Swedish Forestry
Co-operation Programme.
Showier, D. A., Davidson, P., Vongkhamheng, C. and Salivong, Iv.
(1998a) A wildlife and habitat survey of the southern border ofXe Sap
NBCA and the Dakchung Plateau, Xe Kong province, Lao PDR.
Vientiane: CPAWM/WCS.
Showier, D. A., Davidson, P., Khounboline, K. and Salivong, K.
( 1 998b) A wildlife and habitat survey ofNamXam NBCA, Houaphanh
province, Lao PDR. Vientiane: CPAWM/WCS.
Steinmetz, R., Stones, T. and Chan-ard, T. (1999) An ecological survey
of habitats, wildlife, and people in Xe Sap National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Saravan province, Lao PDR. Final report.
Patumthani, Thailand: WWF-Thailand Programme Office.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Anderson, G. Q. A., Dvorak, M.,
Evans, T. D., Nemeth, E., Timmins, R. J. and Wilkinson, R. J.
(1996) Ornithological records for Laos, 1992-1993. Forktail 1 1 : 47-
100.
Thewlis, R. M., Duckworth, J. W., Evans, T. D. and Timmins, R. J.
(1998) The conservation status of birds in Laos: a review of key
species. Bird Conserv Intemat. 8 (Suppl.) 1-159.
Thomas, W. W. and Poole, C. M. (2003) An annotated list of the birds
of Cambodia from 1859 to 1970. Forktail 19: 103-127.
Timmins, R. J. and Robichaud, W. G. (2005) Birds and mammals of
conservation concern in the area of the proposed Nam Theun 1
hydropower project - assessment and recommendations. Unpubl.
report to Electrowatt-Ekono Ltd.
Timmins, R. J. and Vongkhamheng, C. (1996) A preliminary wildlife
and habitat survey ofXe Sap National Biodiversity Conservation Area
and mountains to the south, Saravan province, Lao PDR. Vientiane:
CPAWM/WCS.
Tizard, R. J. ( 1 996) A preliminary wildlife and habitat survey of the proposed
northern extension to the Nakai-Nam Theun National Biodiversity
Conservation Area and adjacent Nam Gnouang area, Lao PDR.
Vientiane: CPAWM/WCS.
Tizard, R. J., Davidson, P., Khounboline, K. and Salivong, K. (1997)
A wildlife and habitat survey of Nam Ha and Nam Kong Protected
Areas, Luang Namtha province, Lao PDR. Vientiane: CPAWM7
WCS.
Tobias, J. (1997) Environmental and social action plan for the Nakai
Nam Theun catchment and corridor areas. Report of the wildlife
survey. Vientiane: unpubl. report by the Wildlife Conservation
Society to IUCN-the World Conservation Union.
Trivedi, P. and Soni, V. C. (2006) Significant bird records and local
extinctions in Purna and Ratanmahal wildlife sanctuaries, Gujarat,
India. Forkail 22: 39-48.
Vogel, C. J., Sweet, P. R., Le Man Hung and Hurley, M. M. (2003)
Ornithological records from Ha Giang province, north-east
Vietnam, during March-June 2000. Forktail 19: 21-30.
Walston, J. L. and Vinton, M. D. (eds) (1999) A wildlife and
habitat survey of Hin Namno National Biodiversity Conservation Area
and adjacent areas, Kliammouane province, Lao PDR. Vientiane:
WWF Lao Project Office and Wildlife Conservation Society Lao
Program.
Jerome Fuchs, UMR5202, Origine, Structure et Evolution de la Biodiversite, Departement Systematique et Evolution,
Museum National d Histoire Naturelle, Case postale 51, 55 Rue Buff on, 75005 Paris, France. Email: fuchs@mnhn.fr
Alice Cibois, Natural History Museum of Geneva, Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, CP6434, 1211 Geneva 6,
Switzerland. Email: alice.cibois@ville-ge.ch
J. IV. Duckworth, East Redham Farm, Pilning, Bristol BS35 4JG, U.K. Email: boonhom@ocellata.com
Roland Eve, Les Salzards, Saint Martin des Champs, 891 70 Saint Fargeau, France. Email: roland. eve@wwfgreatermekong. org
William G. Robichaud, Biodiversity Research Centre, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University
Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; present address: Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, P. O. Box 1 90,
Thakhek, Khammouan province, Lao PDR. Email: williamrobichaud@yahoo.com
Ted Tizard, 1901 Nueces Drive, College Station, Texas 77840, U.S.A. Email: rjtizard@ocellata.com
Dirk Van Gansberghe, Kersnikova 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Email: dirkvangansberghe@yahoo.com
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
53
APPENDIX 1
Birds recorded in Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou
(a) Full list and records for 2003-2005
Year, month and location
Species
Notes
M)
G
08
X
3
X
e. 3
“o
3 s
o w
X Z
3
O
£
3
z
■a a
tor.
C ^
II
<
ft,
z
.5
■3
Mi c
C e>
JO
i o
o x
X ft.
<
c-
Z
.5
*3
c
*C 3
o o
eQ
5Q
£
s|
z S
3
X
3
O
X
ft.
c
*
o
M)
C
O
X
&
» i/5
h
>■ I
3 g
to 3
C 1/3
O T3
^ C
Cm 3
to
C
U
3
O
X
ft.
r,
c
3
3
s
C
c
3
O
ffl
c
3
C3
3
O
a
c
3
3
z
3
3
ca
to c
c £
o ,5
X Z
c c
m cfl
ca
ca
H 5?
c c
3 £
az
£
3 3
ca ft,
ft. u
54
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Species
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
55
Year, month and location
56
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
57
Year, month and location
58
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
59
Year, month and location
60
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
61
Orange-headed Thrush
Zoothera cilrina
Siberian Thrush
Zoothera sibirica . I P
62
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Species
Notes
£>
ft
to
II
J z
o
s
3
z
if
<
c-
z
•d
W> c
C 4>
*>>Q
O J5
J c-
<
Cm
Z
c
■5
d
£ c.
<3
cQ
33^
sf
3 3
Z 1/3
u.
3
O
JS
{V
c S
1 1
S3 Z
= ^
3 3
S3 0-
3
u.
3
Mugimaki Flycatcher
Ficedula mugimaki . / P
Slaty-backed Flycatcher
Ficedula hodgsonii . I P ./P
!•
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
63
Year, month and location
Species
Siberian Blue Robin
Luscinia cyane
Notes
O
W) r
c c
cs a
■8 *
■S - D
Sd
3 c C ~
3 C O %
o « js 2
jz n, 5
<
z
M C
c w
£ j
O JZ
J C-
e
t3
c
. «
o Q
*C 3
o o
£ C-
«iS
c Q
sg
b|
£§
-C
c-
>> o
3 {-
(/) -
tr 3
3 </>
O ^
£ C
— 3
H «=!
3
z
'3
H
nJ
c
•3
H
3
S 3 £
3 O «
Z CQ Z
c c ^
« « cu
e ee
E
[P]/P
P/.
Orange-flanked Bush Robin
Tarsiger cyanurus 26 C/0 01.
64
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Species
Chestnut-vented Nuthatch
Sitta nagaensis
Year, month and location
.If
Chestnut-bellied Nuthatch
Great Tit
Parus major P P/P .1? P/P ,/F P/P P/C P/P P/P
Yellow-cheeked Tit
Pams spilonotus .If P/F
Sultan Tit
Melanochlora sultanea
Sand / Pale Martin
Riparia riparia / R. diliita II P 0
Crested Finchbill
Spizixos canifrons
Striated Bulbul
Pycnonotus striatus P /.
Black-headed Bulbul
Pycnonotus atriceps P /.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
65
Year, month and location
Bush warbler
Bradypterus sp(p). 4 ,/P
66
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
67
Year, month and location
[Slender-billed Scimitar Babbler
Xiphirhynchus superciliaris] J|P]
Limestone Wren Babbler
Napothera crispifrons
P.
Streaked Wren Babbler
Napothera brevicaudata
68
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Species
Notes
Year, month and location
X
G. 3
“O
3 I
o ra
J z
a
O
B
a
Z
■jQ
61
G _
X §
ft, 5
<
c-
z
c
9
61 G
fa
ho
O J3
X ft.
<
ft,
z
c
*3
G
o a
U 3
o o
gjF
= a
iS
|1
3
O
j;
ft.
G
£
O
"eg
V)
61
G
3
U
>.
t
t/>
61
G
O
G
> C/5
II
Z- c
"eg h
Sd 3
c <®
C *3
£ G
ft, 3
61
G
So
c
Z
G
H
i
G
P-
= 3
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
69
./ p p /.
Citrine Wagtail
Motacilla citreola
70
JEROME FUCHS et a!.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Species
Notes
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
71
(b) records from before 2003
Year, month and location
72
JEROME FUCHS et a!.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
1996
Mar
1996
Mar
I is
a S* „
o be x *-
Species
Notes
ca z
c c
A PS
ca ca
1996 1996
Mar Mar
3
o
r* W-
c c
a ps
Z *°
" PS
,£» pC
Ml 3
C ^
O T3
:F e
£- ps
1996 1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929
May May / Apr / Jun Apr Apr/
Jun Jun Jun
Mar Mar May / May / Nov
Jun Jun
a,
C *■
'US
T -a
* s
i <
s= e-
6- Z
o .5
"S •a
“0
3 |
jz jfl £a Sa ca
g <
6. z
c .5
S’!
o <
£ k
- Z
« c
*3 .5
•5
3
s
C
3 w
O v>
ca “
3
O
1929
Apr
c
Blue-eared Barbet
Megalaima australis
Coppersmith Barbet
Megalaima haemacephala 14
Oriental Pied Hornbill
Anthracoceros albirostris P P P 2 1
Great Hornbill
Buceros bicomis 53 P
Brown Hornbill
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
73
Year, month and location
Collared Scops Owl
Otus bakkamoena P
Brown Wood Owl
Strix leptogrammica 1
74
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
Species
Notes
1996
Mar
03
a £
O M
ca z
e c
os 3
ca ca
1996
Mar
c
si
iC* o
“ s
W) 3
C <«
O -g
£ C
CU 3
1996 1996
Mar Mar
3
O
r« M
C C
3 3
z -s
X
3 ft 3
(/) OH
6Jj C°
C 3 r
O 3 «
X o 3
a- jz
1996 1996 1995 1995 1931
Mar Mar May / May / Nov
Jun Jun
1929 1929 1929
May May / Apr/
Jun Jun
'US
T T3
£ c
o «
J Q
©<
£ ft.
I- «-
I I
O 3
£ o
3 <
5 ft.
£z
e.S
■p 03
~ C
<y
o <
X 2-
^ Z
<U _ CA
■3 .S 4J
'2 c **
3 U —
OQ <
3
s
S
rn mi
w 3
C C
3 .3
ca a.
1929
Jun
O
|
z
1929 1929
Apr Apr/
Jun
£
3
33
1929
Apr
ca ca
Black-tailed Crake
Porzana bicolor
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
75
Year, month and location
Species
Notes
1996
Mar
3 d
CO z
c c
a d
cq co
1996
Mar
>» c
S fc
tt 3
C 1/5
c -3
7? c
C- d
1996 1996
Mar Mar
3
O
1996 1996 1995 1995 1931
Mar Mar May / May/ Nov
Jun Jun
1929 1929 1929
May May / Apr/
Jun Jun
£
d
Z
>>
d
JS
0-
to
j: *.
W) y
c
I £
o<
F c-
^ Z
= <
2 o-
£ z
j Z J q £ q
o <
f 2-
- Z
•o .£
si
3 «
OQ
&
c
d
3
s
d
H
c
3
O
00
c
d
CO
SL
c-
1929
Jun
c
£
d
Z
1929 1929
Apr Apr /
Jun
X
c
2
d
X
c
d
CO
1929
Apr
a
d
-J
Blue-naped Pitta
Pitta nipalensis
Rusty-naped Pitta
Pitta oatesi P
Hooded Pitta
Pitta sordida LC
Blue-winged Pitta
Green magpie
Cissa sp(p).
P
76
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar May/ May/ Nov May May/ Apr / Jun Apr Apr / Apr
Jun Jun
Jun Jun
Jun
Species
Notes
3 '3
'r
e >>
3 a
o be
03 Z
c c
ft ft
03 ca
> </)
u
Ml 3
G 1/5
O -o
F 3
0- ft
c
ft
x
ft
X
“o
3 3
3 £
O 3
J z
3 =
O
£ <
G ^
IS
J Q
o <
£ 0^
^ Z
- -
o .5
U -a
-j c
3 <
c .£
3 ’S
i - £ Q
o <
£ On
~ Z
a» - i/>
•a .£ «
*2 2 *35
3 u =q
02 <
C X*
5 3
03 “
c o
3 X
03 2*
3
O
£
cl
Z
o
X
C
a x
* ft
« 0
3 3
23 X
C G
ft ft
CQ 03
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
77
Year, month and location
1996
Mar
i
cs
3*3
^ *7
c >■*
3 «
o m
x z
c c
1996
Mar
si
5 1
Mi 3
C 1/5
O T3
Species
Notes
CQ CQ C- rt
1996
Mar
3
O
1996
Mar
to
§ e
I
1996
Mar
£ <
M y
C ^
1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929
Mar May/ May / Nov May May/ Apr/
Jun Jun
o <
* CU
t- e
o .5
*C -o
4) C
J Q — Q
' c
1 *3
2 <
e .5
*5 c
tr a>
!<
C
33
si
3 u
O Q
&
3
Jun Jun
cJ
H
c >*
c
o
X
Ch
1929
Jun
3
O
1929 1929
Apr
X
a
£
Apr /
Jun
1929
Apr
c
Blue Whistling Thrush
Myophonus caeruleus
Orange-headed Thrush
Zoothera citrina P
Siberian Thrush
Zoothera sibirica 1
Scaly Thrush
Zoothera dauma P P P 1
Eyebrowed Thrush
Turdus obscurus 4
Thrush
Turdus sp(p). P P
Blue-and-white Flycatcher
Cyanoptila cyanomelana P
Verditer Flycatcher
Eumyias thalassina P 3
Large Niltava
Niltava grandis P
Rufous-bellied Niltava
Niltava sundara P
Vivid Niltava
Niltava vivida 24 I
78
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Year, month and location
1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar May / May / Nov May May / Apr / Jun Apr Apr /
e
!i
c >, O
3 « C3 *-
(3
3 ‘
Z S
Species
Notes
ca z
e c
C3 C3
ca CQ
b£ 3
C 1/1
O T3
Cm (3
3
o
Jun Jun
Jun Jun
C. 3
go
O 3
J z
g z
•£.5
V ”3
£ c
0 £
J Q
o <
Z
c
o .5
•£ -3
It c
So
3 <
i <
2 ft- f ft.
ft-Z
ft,Z
c S
•S *3
*3 c
2G
•3 .3
•p
3 'J
OQ
o
it
G
C3
3
S
O
g
1929
Apr
Jun
X J
ft.
JERDON’S BUSHCHAT
Saxicola jerdoni 1
Grey Bushchat
Saxicola ferrea P 1
Chestnut-tailed Starling
Stumus malabaricus 1
Asian Pied Starling
Stumus contra 8
Sultan Tit
Melanochlora sultanea P
Plain Martin
Riparia paludicola 53 P
Dusky Crag Martin
Hirundo concolor P
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
79
Year, month and location
80
JEROME FUCHS et a!.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Rusty-rumped Warbler
Locustella certhiola 1
Mountain Tailorbird
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
81
Year, month and location
1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar May / May / Nov May May / Apr/ Jun Apr Apr /
1929
Apr
Species
Notes
2 - I «
II
' . > 3
3 « « }-
O M) </) 2
CO Ml 3
o -a
£ c
0- ft
Jun Jun
C
-3
C C
22 03
i2* -3
3 £■ 3
cfl Ma
M C U
C 73 C
O 3 C
.c c 3
Cm JZ
£ <
^ 0-
£z
•?..£
T ■a
S c
0 2!
j Q
o <C
£
- Z
r
0 .5
■c -9
o C
£ <u
Q
3<
2 0.
c .5
■5 c
O <
&<Z
3 S
O Q
Jun Jun
•a
H
Jun
B
3
Z
K
c
3
O
« J3
2 o
3 «
B J
c c
rt 3
o; oa
82
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
83
Year, month and location
1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1995 1995 1931 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929 1929
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar May / May / Nov May May / Apr / Jun Apr Apr /
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
Species
Notes
z'f2
3 k
O M
a z
c c
3 3
sa a
c
> </>
Ii
'■ o
8 fc
bi 3
C 5/1
O T3
f c
a 3
3
O
£
3
z
c
3
X
3
A
&-S
3 C
3 s
O 3
J z
.C
*
o >'
c ^
" "3
£ e
o
J C
O < 3 < o <
^ 6. ® a. x ft.
e- z £ z - z
^ e .5 -a ,S
51 Ss
rr* 3 o
£Q OQ
c .5
’C *2
<u c
£ o
■Sq
c
3
a
3
H
3 >•
a m
w c
c o
3 A
a a
3
o
£
z
SB
c
c
a
x
c
rt
X
1929
Apr
B
ffl
a
Eurasian Tree Sparrow
Passer montanus
Forest Wagtail
Dendronanthus indicus
White Wagtail
Motacilla alba
CPC
LC C
Yellow-breasted Bunting
Emberiza aureola
Chestnut Bunting
Emberiza rutila
Key
Cells for 1995-2005, abundance assessments based on days in suitable habitat using techniques suitable to find the species: ‘C’ = common (recorded daily, often
in large numbers), ‘F’ = frequent (recorded on most days), ‘O’ = occasional (recorded on fewer than half the days), ‘P’ = present, but abundance not assessed,
V = not recorded (in many cases, this cannot be taken as even weakly suggestive of genuine absence); ‘L’ (prefix) = evidently localised even within suitable habitat.
Cells for 1929-1931: the number indicates the number of specimens collected.
Many columns give two assessments, separated by a slash (/): this indicates the status in two survey periods respectively, as indicated in the ‘months’ row.
[ ] = Provisional record; brackets round a species’s name indicate all records present and past should be considered provisional.
All codes in the cells of the table refer to wild, living birds except REM = only recorded as remains in the field; CAGE = only recorded as living bird in captivity.
Modern sites, 1996-2005
Louangphabang Nam Ou = the Nam Ou between its mouth and Muang Koa (1996) or Ban Muangngoy (2004).
Phongsaly Nam Ou (not PDD) = the Nam Ou between Muang Koa (1996) or Ban Muangngoy (2004) and the mouth of the Nam Va.
Low-lying Phou Dendin NPA = the surveyed Nam Ou upstream of the Nam Va mouth; includes the Nam Khang to Ban Tatoung and adjacent forest within 1
2 km and up to c.800 m.
Interior Phou Dendin NPA = hill and mountain habitats of Phou Dendin NPA, north of the Nam Va.
Nam Houn & south PDD: the Nam Houn and Phou Dendin NPA south of the Nam Va.
Phou Fa = Phou Fa forest area, as bounded by the park (records from some surveys are listed under ‘Phongsaly town and surrounds’).
Phongsaly town = the garden of the Hotel Phou Fa, the EU project compound, the intervening road and the remainder of the urban area. The list is not complete;
birds common in the adjacent scrub or in Phou Fa forest were not necessarily noted (records from some surveys are listed under ‘Phongsaly town and surrounds’).
Phongsaly scrub = the trails out of the town to various villages (see text).
84
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Phongsaly town and surrounds = observations from Phou Fa, the town and hotel gardens (from March 1996, May 2004, in part March 2005, where records could
not all be ascribed to the more precise categories).
Ban Boun-Tai to Pak Namnoy = road journey from Ban Boun-Tai to Pak Namnoy, 27 December 2004 and 26 March 2005.
Elsewhere 2003 = incidental records from various parts of Phongsaly, Boun-Tai and Boun-Nua districts, 13-17 September 2003.
Other named sites, see text.
Other recent records (previously published)
1995, Outside Phou Dendin NPA = Nam Ou downstream of Phou Dendin NPA, and (marked ‘(PF)’) Phou Fa, Phongsaly town, 23-24 May and 2-3 June 1995.
The valuable records of Salter (1992) are not incorporated, because no copies of the report can now be found.
Historical
1931 = the Legendre Indochina Expedition (Dickinson 1970a), pooling records from all localities in Phongsaly province and/or along the Nam Ou.
1929 = the Kelley-Roosevelts' expedition (Bangs and Van Tyne 1931).
There are probably also specimens from F. R. Wulsin but these have never been written up and so are not entered in this table.
Footnotes to species
1 . The record from Phou Taleng was of a bird calling in a valley far below.
2. A subspecies with males very white in plumage.
3. Birds at Ban Long Nay Mai and Ban Namaek fitted P. i. malayorum.
4. Abundance assessment excludes individuals identified to species.
5. Head pattern of race M. a. davisoni. An oft-apparent dark moustachial stripe
seemed to be due to a fold in the feathering extending from the gape.
6. Provisionally identified by ear on the basis of song.
7. Domestic birds were widespread in 2004-2005, but no evidence was found
of feral populations (i.e. wild-breeding birds not owned by anybody); previous
reports did not rule out free-flying domestic birds.
8. Additionally, one was seen between Ban Boun-Nua and Phongsaly town in
May 2004.
9. Includes at least one sighting published as potentially a Grey-headed Fish
Eagle; see text.
10. Lesser Kestrel F. naumanni was not always eliminated, but has not recently
been recorded from Laos.
1 1 . See text for racial identification.
1 2 . Winter-plumage pond herons cannot be identified in the field (Robson 2000);
on geographical grounds, all were probably Chinese Pond Heron.
13. All November-December birds were a race other than L. c. lucionensis ; but
the latter accounted for all May 2004 records.
14. All birds resembled L. s. tricolor in plumage.
15. Several adult males were seen; none was O. t. nigellicauda, which might also
occur (see Robson 2000).
16. Field identification of Indochinese and Black-winged Cuckooshrikes is
challenging (Robson 2000). Most birds fitted the latter, but at least one had
white stripes down the sides of the under-tail, supposedly indicating
Indochinese.
17. Field identification of Ashy, Rosy and Swinhoe’s Minivets is challenging
(Robson 2000), especially because birds are often seen only in overhead
flight and share similar calls.
18. Grey-chinned, and, especially, Long-tailed and Short-billed Minivets are
difficult to separate in the field (Robson 2000). Most sightings were left
unidentified.
19. Hundreds of birds were seen; all were dark-cheeked. White-cheeked forms
occur in North Laos mainly or entirely on passage (JWD unpubl.). D. 1.
hopwoodi was identified at Ban Long Nay Mai in May 2004.
20. One photographed in November or December at Ban Boun-Tai was race M.
s. pandoo.
2 1 . All birds seen well in November-December (about half the total) had yellow
bills, and were a race other than Al c. caeruleus.
22. The 2004-2005 netting records fitted B. 1. carolinae.
23. All birds seen well appeared to be Rufous-bellied rather than Fujian Niltava
N. davidv. the rich orange underparts extended right to the vent, and the
entire crown shone blue.
24. A Phongsaly specimen listed in Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) as Fujian Niltava
was reidentified as this species by Dickinson (1973).
25. Only the very few identified visually ruled out White-tailed Rubythroat
L. pectoralis, likely to occur in Laos, which calls like Siberian Rubythroat
(Robson 2000).
26. All blue males seen were T. c. ntfilatus, rather than the nominate; the latter
has also occurred recently in North Laos (JWD unpubl.).
27. A few were clearly S. r. stejnegeri, the common wintering form of lowland
Laos, but some seemed to be S. r. przewalsku , a localised breeder in Laos.
28. All birds resembled 5. c. tonkinensis.
29. These birds were not H. striolata stanfordi; see text for further discussion.
30. Northern House Martin can be difficult to separate, but viewing conditions
were often excellent and birds sometimes called; Northern, if present at all,
was at best very scarce.
31. A red-vented form.
32. In 2004-2005, dozens of birds were seen well and all except one (at Phou
Fa on 10 December) were a black-headed form.
33. All birds seen well resembled P. i. extensicauda, rather than P. i. herberti of
(e.g.) Vientiane.
34. Identification of white-eyes to species in Laos (other than well-marked
Chestnut-flanked) is difficult; skins at NHM show imperfect congruence in
the different plumage features usually suggested to assist identification, and
calls vary between Lao localities from birds which all look like Japanese
White-eye (JWD unpubl.) . Hence, birds with prominent yellow central belly
bands have been assigned to Oriental, and ‘white-eye sp(p).’ used for birds
lacking visibly chestnut flanks or such a band.
35. The only bird seen showed neither a yellow supercilium nor a well-marked
yellow frons; on underpart pattern it was identified as Slaty-bellied Tesia.
Confirmation is desirable.
36. Some birds strongly washed yellow below and greenish above suggested the
possibility of Tickell’s Leaf Warbler P. affinis (never recorded from Indochina);
but variation in these characters seemed to be continuous, and calls fitted far
better those of Buff-throated Warbler, as described in Robson (2000).
37. Clearly not Pallas’s Leaf Warbler; outside Phou Dendin NPA, few records
could exclude Lemon-rumped Leaf Warbler P. chloronotus ; this is probably
less likely (see Duckworth et al. 1999, Lynam et al. 2006: 1 12), but previous
records have not yet been fully reviewed. Known as P. sichuanensis by Inskipp
et al. (1996), but see Martens and Eck (1995).
38. On calls, some/most birds may have been P. t. trochiloides and/or P. t. obscuratus ,
rather than P. (t.) plumbeitarsus, the common wintering form of lowland
Laos, and to which the Kelley-Roosevelts’ specimens are now assigned.
39. This species (probably paraphyletic, as currently defined: Olssoner al. 2005)
is difficult to distinguish from several similar taxa. Birds were identified
(which were of non-yellow race [s] ) by trunk- and bough-clinging behaviour,
apparently not shown by Emei Leaf Warbler (Alstrom and Olsson 1995).
See also White-tailed Leaf Warbler.
40 . Much brighter than the apparent Blyth’s Leaf Warblers in the area, so probably
the nominate, not the duller P. d. disturbans, which might also occur. Three
Kelley-Roosevelts’ specimens originally identified as Blyth’s Leaf Warbler
are now reassigned to P. d. davisoni. See also Blyth’s Leaf Warbler
4 1 . Pending clarification of the taxonomic status of Indochinese karst breeding
populations akin to this species, identification is kept provisional. Silent
birds are probably indistinguishable in the field.
42. A distinctive form, tape-recorded.
43. 'Golden-spectacled Warbler’ is a complex of similar species; see text.
44. One bird (from 600 m) seemed to show a yellow chin and may have been
White-spectacled Warbler 5. affinis , not yet certainly recorded in Laos.
45. All the few birds seen were of the pale-cheeked, ‘typical’, form.
46. White-browed P. schisticeps and Streak-breasted Scimitar Babbler perhaps
intergrade; see text.
47. The 2005 netting record fitted N. e. amyae.
48 . Rufous-fronted and Rufous-capped Babblers are very similar (Robson 2000)
but those seen well (except one in Phou Dendin NPA) showed facial features
of Rufous-fronted. Moreover, Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) identified only
Rufous-fronted among Phongsaly specimens. Past Lao sight records identified
as Rufous-capped warrant critical review; status elsewhere in the northern
highlands is uncertain (e.g. Davidson 1998, 1999).
49 . Bangs and Van T yne (1931) omitted the locality details of Kelley-Roosevelts’
specimens; all came from Vietnam.
50. Potentially present among the many unidentified dull-plumaged
flowerpeckers seen and heard in November-December 2004.
51 . Other congeners potentially overlooked; only c. 20% ofHet/ioJiy^aindividuals
were identified to species.
52. The several species which call with a tic note.
53. Thewlis et al. (1998) detailed the 1992, 1995 and 1996 records.
5 4 . Kelley-Roosevelts’ specimens housed in FMNH warrant checking to confirm
species identification.
55. Specimens listed under Ban Boun-Tai actually come from ‘Long Nai’.
56. The series of ten bush warblers reported by Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) as
Homochlamys fortipes davidiana was re-examined by P. C. Rasmussen (in litt.
1999) and found to contain both C. fortipes and C. flavolivacea oblitus.
57. Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) listed two specimens of Tribura luteoventris from
Phongsaly; Dickinson etal. (2000) found them both to be Bradypterus mandelli
(= B. seebohmi in Inskipp et al. 1996).
58. A record of Yellow-billed Grosbeak Eophona migratoria from Phongsaly in
1996 given in Duckworth (1999) was in error (TT unpublished data).
!'
Forktail 23 (2007)
Birds of Phongsaly province and the Nam Ou river, Laos
85
APPENDIX 2
Gazetteer of localities visited and mentioned in Phongsaly province, and selected other sites
86
JEROME FUCHS et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Key
Sources for other names: BCI = Thewlis et al. (1998); BVT = Bang and Van Tyne (1931); Leg = the Legendre Expedition (Dickinson 1970a); local = phonetic
rendition of name in current local use; Osg = Osgood (1932).
Altitudes given as a range reflect the actual locations of bird observations.
Coordinates were taken from the RDPL SGE 1: 100,000 topographic maps; see below), except those marked * which were taken with a GPS. For streams, co¬
ordinates of the mouth are given (indicated as such) when significant lengths were surveyed (indicated in the text) . For streams visited at only a point or short length,
that site’s coordinates are given.
1 Another Ban Laophouchai lies at 22°19'N 102°24'E, but both distance from Ban Hatxa and altitude given in Bangs and Van Tyne (1931) indicate that they
visited the southern of the two.
2 At least two further peaks called Phou Dendin are mapped, at 22°16'N 102°37'E and 22°17'N 102°37'E, rising to 1,533 m and 1,614 m respectively.
3 Ban Muanghat-hin (map name) lies a little upstream of Ban Hathin (map name, Ban Sing) and these are now effectively contiguous.
4 A village mapped as Ban Xiengpi a little to the north-west of map-named Ban Bomang is in the position of today’s Ban Sombun.
5 A village mapped as Ban Namli lies c.2 km south-west of the present position.
6 Very different coordinates and altitude were given for this site by Thewlis et al. (1998), who however stated that they had not located the site on RDPL SGE
maps. The directions of Delacour and Greenway (1940a: 19-20) for Taloun point to the village of this name, which also fits in terms of terrain and altitude.
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 87-91
Estimating the resident population size of Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus in Peninsular Malaysia
LAURENT MOLARD, MARC KERY and CLAYTON M. WHITE
The South-East Asian subspecies of Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus ernesti is among the least known of this cosmopolitan species, with
no confirmed reports of its nesting in Peninsular Malaysia until 1996. Between October 2003 and May 2005, we conducted a field survey
for breeding sites across c. 20, 000 km2 of Peninsular Malaysia. Combining the survey results with sites found by others yielded a total of
1 5 known pairs, with six others strongly suspected. All reproductive behaviours, from courtship to the fledging of juveniles, were observed.
Based on ecological requirements (cliff habitat and observed density), we conducted an intensive study of topographical and geological
maps covering a quarter of Peninsular Malaysia. We suggest there may be at least 70-80 pairs in 135,000 km2 of Peninsular Malaysia.
Potential threats include excessive quarrying of limestone and the use of pesticides. The impact of these two factors, as well as the true
distribution and abundance, need further study.
INTRODUCTION
The Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus is one of the most
widely distributed terrestrial vertebrates (Cad cetal. 1988,
Ratcliffe 1993, Monneret 2000). Not surprisingly,
therefore, there is extensive geographic variation in
morphology, with between 16 (Ferguson-Lees and
Christie 2001) and 24 (Monneret 2000) subspecies
recognised worldwide. Perhaps as a consequence of its
wide distribution, the Peregrine Falcon is one of the best-
studied bird species, with over 2,000 references to it in
the primary literature. However, most of these studies
have been conducted in the Americas (particularly North
America), Europe, southern Africa and Australia;
relatively few data are available from Asia. Only two of
the five subspecies found in the Asia-Pacific region have
been studied: F. p. nesiotes in Fiji and Vanuatu (Clunie
1972, White etal. 1988, 2000) andF. p. peregrinator in Sri
Lanka (Dottlinger 2002, Dottlinger and Nicholls 2005).
According to two of the major monographs on the
species (Cade ex al. 1988, Ratcliffe 1993), plus White et
al. (1994) and Brown and Amadon (1968), Peninsular
Malaysia is not included in the breeding range of the
Peregrine Falcon. Although Wells ( 1999) and Ferguson-
Lees and Christie (2001) have since corrected this error,
only two putative breeding sites (Bukit Takun and Batu
Caves) have been previously reported in the literature
(Jeyarajasingam and Pearson 1999, Wells 1999).
Lurthermore, since the first documentation of a successful
nest in Malaysia occurred only recently (Chong 2002),
virtually nothing is known of the annual cycle of Peregrine
Falcon in this region. Here, we report our findings on the
breeding of the subspecies found in Peninsular Malaysia.
We use data from an intensive two-year survey, a synthesis
of the observations of others and a detailed map study to
yield a breeding population estimate for Peregrine Falcon
in Peninsular Malaysia.
METHODS
Identification
The resident subspecies ernesti is very dark, with a slate-
grey back and a black head lacking white on the ear-
coverts. The underparts are lavender with some grey
suffusion and are heavily but narrowly barred black. In
Malaysia, however, some adults are very deep rusty below,
resembling the migratory subspecies peregrinator from the
southern Indian subcontinent and Sri Lanka. However,
peregrinator does not have the black head of ernesti and the
barring on the underparts is not as fine, or is lacking
altogether, while the back is a paler blue-grey. Fledglings
in Malaysia also resemble ernesti rather than peregrinator ,
being darker brown, more heavily streaked below (and
more broadly on the flanks), without conspicuous rufous
fringes above or white ear-coverts.
While the current range of peregrinator is defined as
extending eastward into northern Myanmar and central
and south-eastern China, individuals from that region do
not have the deep rusty colour below. The taxonomic
status of these birds as well as those with rusty underparts
in Malaysia requires additional study, but is beyond the
scope of this paper. The literature suggests that peregrinator
may occur as vagrants from Thailand or Burma in Malaysia
(Wells 1999), perhaps based on the occurrence of
individuals with rusty underparts. There is no white
auricular area in ernesti and hence no distinct moustache,
which clearly distinguishes ernesti from the migrant
japonensis which visits during October-April from north¬
eastern Siberia, Japan and Korea (Cade et al. 1 988, Wells
1 999, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 200 1 ) . This subspecies
is lighter-toned, with whiter underparts, lighter barring,
a distinct moustache and often conspicuous white
forehead. All information in this paper relates to the
resident subspecies ernesti.
Fieldwork
For logistical reasons our study was restricted to Peninsular
Malaysia, which extends roughly 400 km from north to
south and 250 km from west to east. Fieldwork was
conducted by LM between October 2003 and June 2005.
After close examination of 1 :50,000 topographical maps,
a four-wheel-drive vehicle was used to explore suitable
Peregrine Falcon habitat on roads or jungle trails. A half¬
day boat trip to the cliffs south of Tioman Island was also
conducted. Since there are no confirmed records of tree¬
nesting Peregrine Falcons anywhere in South-East Asia,
the search focused on rocky cliffs and tall buildings in
urban areas . Typically, about one hour was spent scanning
each potential nesting site, using 10x42 binoculars and a
20-60x80 mm telescope. At each site, LM took
photographs and recorded any evidence of Peregrine
88
LAURENT MOLARD, MARC KERY and CLAYTON M. WHITE
Forktail 23 (2007)
Falcon activity, either sightings of birds or indications of
their presence including faecal stains (whitewash), perching
places and eyrie locations. Sites where no Peregrine Falcons
were observed were revisited once or twice. LM also
collated information from local birdwatchers.
Map analysis
To estimate the total number of Peregrine Falcon pairs
in Peninsular Malaysia, we supplemented our fieldwork
with a map analysis (following Ratcliffe 1993). We
examined topographic 1:50,000 scale maps (from the
Malaysian Geographic Agency) and a geological
1:500,000 scale map (from the General Mineral and
Geosciences Department of Malaysia) for suitable
Peregrine Falcon nesting sites (limestone outcrops or hills
with cliffs). Although a few cliffs may have been missed
by observers and some pairs may live in large cities, it
appears likely that the southern part of Peninsular Malaysia
is not inhabited by breeding Peregrine Falcons
(Jeyarajasingam and Pearson 1999, Wells 1999). We
therefore focused our analysis on the central and northern
sectors (north of 3"N) . One hundred and thirty-one maps
cover this area, with 7 5 currently available. Forty-eight of
these were examined because they cover mountains,
foothill country, and for a few maps from Perlis (two),
Pahang (two) and Kedah (three), coastal areas with
isolated limestone outcrops. To calibrate our map
interpretation, we compared known sites that we had
visited with their appearance on the maps. Field
observations indicated that no cliff or network of cliffs
within roughly 7 km was occupied by more than a single
pair. We therefore assumed that only one pair of Peregrine
Falcons would be found per cliff cluster on a map.
RESULTS
Survey results
A total of 1 78 observations of Peregrine Falcon was made
at 15 sites, of which eight were new confirmed sites and
seven were previously known sites. Six other sites are
suspected to hold breeding pairs (Fig. 1).
Kuala Lumpur and Selangor state (3°10'N 10°42'E)
Site 1. LM observed a pair of Peregrine Falcons in a northern
suburb of Kuala Lumpur for almost two years, from 6
October 2003. The pair shared their time between a
telephone tower and a tall building, about 750 m apart. The
full spectrum of breeding behaviour, from courtship (with
aerial territorial display “Z” shaped flights [Monneret 2000]
on 1 0 October 2004) to copulation (between 30 November
and 24 April), food exchanges, egg-laying (around 10
February), incubation and hunting, was observed. This
pair’s breeding attempts failed in both 2004 and 2005, as
no juveniles were observed at this site in either year.
Site 2. An adult pair was found on 7 December 2003
at Bukit Takun, Selangor state, 1 5 km north from Kuala
Lumpur. This site is a huge rocky outcrop (150 m tall),
bordered on one side by primary forest and on the other
by rapidly developing open landscapes containing housing
and golf courses. The pair engaged in courtship and
territorial activity. A passing female Peregrine Falcon of
unknown subspecies and age was vigorously attacked by
the pair on 16 November 2005. Incubation was confirmed
on 24 January 2004 (the female was seen on a ledge,
Figure 1 . Nesting sites of Peregrine Falcon Falcoperegrinus in Peninsular
Malaysia. Circles indicate confirmed sites (i.e., checked during our
2003-2005 survey). Squares represent suspected sites (i.e., reported
previously or recently discovered, but not checked during our survey).
Light grey represents lowlands (0-300 m), mid-grey represents hills
(300-1,000 m) and dark grey represents montane zones (>1,000 m).
lowering her body and rolling it as if on eggs), but the eggs
were lost or never hatched. On 23 January 2005, both
birds were seen visiting the same ledge. This site is
mentioned by Wells (1999), who also recorded an
unsuccessful reproduction attempt in 1985.
Site 3. Continued occupation of another previously
known site in Selangor state, at Batu Caves (Wells 1 999),
was confirmed on 1 1 June 2004. With a maximum
elevation of 180 m, this site is slowly becoming enclosed
by urban sprawl. However, this and its religious
importance prevent it from being quarried. Social
interactions such as pair-flight, prey exchange and
copulation were observed.
Sites 1-3 form a triangle with side lengths of
approximately 1 5 km. The exploration of other potential
nesting cliffs revealed no other pairs in the area. The
closest known occupied sites are 40 km to the north-east
and 140 km to the north.
Perak state near Ipoh (4°36'N 101°04'E)
Site 4. On 4 July 2004, LM saw a pair at a previously
known site 7 km from the centre of Ipoh in an ‘island’ of
natural cliff vegetation within a developed urban area.
Site 5. A pair apparently nested in a small cliff, but
spent most of their time in the structure of a suburban
factory, 6 km from downtown Ipoh. From there, the birds
attacked their favourite prey, House Swifts Apus affinis,
thousands of which nest in the factory. This pair
reproduced successfully in both 2004 and 2005 : a juvenile
was found nearly drowned in a factory tank in 2004 and
at least three juveniles were seen in April-May 2005 (Chiu
S. C. verbally 2004).
Site 6. This site is near one of the largest quarries in
Malaysia, 20 km from downtown Ipoh. No Peregrine
Falcons were observed when visiting on 8 August 2004,
despite previous observations that year by local birders
Forktail 23 (2007) Estimating resident population size of Peregrine Falcon in Peninsular Malaysia
89
and the presence of abundant recent whitewash. At a site
1 km distant, a fledged juvenile was photographed in
2002 (Chang K. S. verbally 2006).
Site 7. No Peregrine Falcons were observed at this site
on a rocky outcrop at the southern fringe of downtown
Ipoh on 8 August 2004, but they were seen there before
and after (Chiu S. C. and Chang K. S. verbally 2006).
Site 8. One juvenile was observed flying in typical food¬
begging, fluttering flight (Sherrod 1983) towards the
adults on 29 May 2005 at this site, which is 20 km south
of Ipoh in a large complex of tall cliffs on a 360-m-high
limestone mountain.
Site 9. One fledged juvenile was observed on 29 May
2005, 1 5 km south of Ipoh in a disused quarry surrounded
by cattle pastures. Two juveniles Hedged in 2006 (Chiu
S. C. verbally 2006).
Pahang state
Site 1 0. In an isolated outcrop 1 0 km south-east of Bentong
(3°29'N 101°56'E), a single Peregrine Falcon was
observed attacking an Accipitersp. on 16 January 2005. A
pair was observed on 10 and 26 February 2005. Nesting
was not documented despite observation of copulation.
This isolated cliff is not very high (100 m) and groups of
long-tailed macaques Macaca fascicularis, potential nest
predators, were observed climbing on it.
Site 11. A single Peregrine Falcon was observed on 2 1
January 2005, on a isolated rocky outcrop 10 1cm north¬
west of Kuala Lipis (4°1 l'N 102°03,E). A pair of falcons
was seen on 16 May 2005.
Site 12. One Peregrine Falcon was seen briefly on 5
February 2005, flying out of a rocky outcrop 10 km east
of Raub (3°48'N 101°5 l'E), after giving an alarm call to
a Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis. On 27 March 2005,
a pair of Peregrine Falcons was observed in an aerial prey
exchange, after which the female disappeared into a hole
(presumably the eyrie) in the middle of an active quarry
close to the first observation site. On 4 June 2005, a fledged
juvenile was observed.
Site 13. A pair was observed on 28 March 2005 on the
southermost of three isolated rocky outcrops, 25 km inland
from Kuantan (3°49'N 1 03°20'E) . Two quarries had been
worked in the two northern outcrops, and a company
representative told LM that one outcrop at least would be
completely destroyed. Like the Kuala Lumpur group of
cliffs, this eastern group of sites is 50 km away from the
nearest neighbouring sites in the central ridge of Peninsular
Malaysia.
Site 14. On 28 March 2005, no adults were observed,
but two nestlings were seen in an eyrie c.30 km north of
Temerloh (3°27'N 1 02°2 1 'E) at 250 m. On 1 0 April 2005,
one juvenile had just left the eyrie, while the second was
still present.
Site 15. No Peregrine Falcons were seen on 30 January
2005 at a site lOkmsouthofMerapoh (4°41'N 102°00'E),
but two fledged birds were seen on 1 6 April 2005 flying to
and from an adjacent smaller outcrop. No adults were
observed. This site is part of a cluster of cliffs around Gua
Musang in the adjacent state of Kelantan, where at least five
other potential sites with copious whitewash were found.
Additional suspected sites
These were identified from a detailed review of Suara
Enggang , the bulletin published by the Malaysian Nature
Society, and through personal communications.
Site 16. Noack (2002) reported a pair in Perlis State
Park close to the Thailand border from 26 January to 5
March 2002. Breeding may have taken place as one bird
was seen on 26 January disappearing into a ledge after
feeding. The nesting attempt may have been abandoned
on 1 February, when a group of long-tailed macaques
were seen being mobbed on the ledge by two adult
Peregrine Falcons. A pair of Peregrine Falcons had
previously been observed at this site on 28 and 31
December 2000 by Noack (2002).
Site 17. Chong (2002) published details of the first
known successful breeding in Malaysia in T emengor Dam
Reserve on 23 February 1996. Since he clearly saw the
feeding female, but not the nestlings, they were likely less
than one week old.
Site 18. In December 2003, photographs of three
Peregrine Falcons, including one immature, were taken
by the side of a road, east of Ipoh (L. Poh verbally 2004).
Site 19. In 2005, a Peregrine Falcon was seen perched
on a high-tension tower at Ulu Sungai Guar recreation
area (Bubu Forest), Kuala Kangsar district (Chiu S. C. in
litt. 2006).
Sites 20-21. D. Wells (in litt. 2006) indicated two other
sites which, owing to the species’s nest-site fidelity, may still
be occupied: Bukit Air Jemih, Perlis (occupied in the 1 980s)
and an outcrop in Kelantan plain (occupied in the 1990s).
Peregrine Falcons have also been observed regularly at
Genting Highland Resort, on the top of the main range at
1,770 m. Although it is not clear if the birds are nesting
there, the large buildings offer possible nesting sites.
Population estimate
The examination of maps (see Methods) indicated
possible nesting sites at a number of locations in addition
to the sites we surveyed. A total of 27 maps showed 77
isolated rocky outcrops or cliff clusters that are typical
nesting sites (Fig. 2), including 15 of the 21 known or
suspected sites. A closer examination of the topographic
features (e.g., degree of isolation; steepness of the cliff-
Figure 2. Map coverage of Malaysia from which Peregrine Falcon
Falco peregrinus population estimates were calculated.
90
LAURENT MOLARD, MARC KERY and CLAYTON M. WHITE
Forktail 23 (2007)
Figure 3. Estimated distribution of the Peninsular Malaysian
subpopulations of Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus based on map analysis.
Sizes of the circles indicates the estimated number of suitable sites.
Question marks (?) indicate potential, but unconfirmed, nesting areas.
face), combined with the density of nesting pairs that we
observed in the field (i.e., a distance of at least 15 km
between pairs), allowed us to arrive at the following
approximate population estimates: 20-30 pairs from
Merapoh to Guah Musang area (a particularly dense area
of cliffs), 20 pairs in Ipoh area (another area rich in cliffs),
and ten pairs in coastal Perlis. An additional 20 pairs may
occur in isolated sites away from these three concentrations,
including those in Kuala Lumpur, Bentong, Temerloh,
and Raub (Fig. 3). Further exploration of rocky outcrops
in Terrenganu, and location of pairs breeding in urban
areas in the south of Peninsular Malaysia may add to this.
These totals therefore provide a very preliminary estimate
of 70-80 pairs breeding in Peninsular Malaysia. Note that
a maximum of only 20 of these sites (i.e., <30%) have
been directly observed either by previous observers or
during this survey. The true number of pairs may well be
lower than our estimates based on site suitability.
Timing of the annual cycle
From our observations, courtship takes place mostly in
December-January. Egg-laying seems to occur from the
end of January to the beginning of February. The female
at the site in Kuala Lumpur appeared to start incubation
on 9 February. Chong (2002) described the feeding of
young nestlings at the end of February, and this was also
seen at site 9 at the same time in 2006 (Chiu S. C. in litt.
2006). One newly fledged juvenile was seen in mid-April
at site 5 in Pahang state, and in May, juveniles flying well
were seen at sites 14 and 15 in Pahang state and at sites
8 and 9 in Perak around Ipoh.
DISCUSSION
Distribution and population size
Peregrine Falcons in Peninsular Malaysia appear to be
most abundant in the north-central area, in Perak and in
Kelantan, on both sides of the main range, and close to the
Thailand border in the west (Perlis state). Areas rich in
rocky limestone outcrops are favoured and detailed analysis
would be useful to determine if, as in other parts of the
world, larger cliffs are preferred (Ratcliffe 1 993) . No nesting
is known in smaller cliffs, at least in the Kuala Lumpur area.
In central Peninsular Malaysia, Peregrine Falcons face a
relative shortage of sites, and pairs are spaced by up to 60
km. South of Kuala Lumpur, nesting appears possible only
in urban sites or old stone quarries. From our exploration
of more than 20 nesting sites, their main characteristics
seem to be the presence of a steep rock face or tall building
and shelter from the sun (especially in the midday heat).
During the survey, we observed many Peregrine Falcons
perched in the shade in recesses (both in natural caves and
on buildings). We have observed nesting sites surrounded
by primary forest, populated suburbs, large urban cities
and industrial palm or rubber tree plantations. All sites
were close or immediately adjacent to open areas for hunting.
Based on our observations, it seems that Peregrine Falcons
have adapted to some degree to human-modifed
environments, as elsewhere in the world.
A total of 2 1 nesting sites is now known in Peninsular
Malaysia in 2005, with pairs confirmed at 15 of them.
Breeding was confirmed in 2003-2005 at five sites and
was very likely at two others. Our map analysis suggested
there might be as many as 70 pairs in Peninsular Malaysia.
Wells (1999) suggested there may be 20-50 breeding pairs
in the entire Thai-Malay peninsula, but our analysis
indicates that this is likely to have been an underestimate,
most probably resulting from a lack of observations. Our
map-based estimate assumes that only one pair of Peregrine
Falcons nest per cliff cluster. More observations are needed
to confirm this, although a similar spacing of eyries has
been found in optimal habitat in Fiji and Vanuatu (White
etal. 1988, 2000).
Reproduction and threats
In 2005, nine juveniles were observed at five sites, confirming
Chong’s (2002) observation that Peregrine Falcons
successfully breed in Malaysia. There is, however, a troubling
lack of breeding success in the Kuala Lumpur area, where
no successful fledging was observed, despite close
surveillance. Although disturbance may be a factor in
downtown Kuala Lumpur, this cannot explain the lack of
productivity at Bukit T akun, which is relatively undisturbed.
A campaign of communication and public awareness, along
with artificial nesting boxes in downtown Kuala Lumpur,
may help, but not if infertility is the reason for failure.
Apart from direct disturbance, human alteration of
breeding sites is the main threat to Peregrine Falcon habitat
in Peninsular Malaysia. With the current strong economic
development, housing construction is flourishing and this
requires abundant cement derived from limestone cliffs.
Quarrying is particularly intensive around Ipoh, although
the sheer number of suitable cliffs in that area enables
Peregrine Falcons to find alternatives if their nest sites are
destroyed by quarrying. Flowever, in areas where
limestone outcrops are rarer, the preservation of the
nesting cliff is essential. The destruction of cliffs could
lead to the disappearance of nesting Peregrine Falcons in
the lowlands, such as in south-east Pahang state.
Deleterious effects of pesticides may also occur in
Malaysia because many organochloride products (such as
dieldrin) are still used, despite being banned in Europe
Forktail 23 (2007) Estimating resident population size of Peregrine Falcon in Peninsular Malaysia
91
and North America since the 1 970s. Chemical analysis of
eggs or tissues from Peregrine Falcons might help to
determine if these chemicals are adversely affecting the
Malaysian population.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
LM wishes to thank MK and CMW for their friendship, support and
patience in preparing this paper. The fieldwork would not have been
possible without the help of Malaysian N ature Society (MNS) members,
such as Lim Aun Tiah, Laurence Poh, Chiu Sein Chiong and Chang
Kai Soon, who shared the exploration of new sites and the thrill of
discovering new pairs. We thank: Yeap Chin Aik for use of the MNS
observation database; Lim Kim Chye, Connie Khoo and Ooi Beng
Yean for sharing their pictures; David Wells, who made valuable
comments on the project and provided information on previous
observations; Audrey Poh for encouraging LM in difficult times, in
memory of Laurence Poh; and Rene-Jean Monneret for having inspired
in LM a passion for the Peregrine Falcon.
REFERENCES
Brown, L. and Amadon, D. (1968) Eagles , hawks and falcons of the
world, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Cade, T. J., Enderson, J. H., Thelander, C. G. and White, C. M., eds.
(1988) Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery.
Boise, Idaho: Peregrine Fund.
Chong,M. H. N. (2002) Peregrine Falcon Falcoperegrinusemesti nesting
atTemengorForestReserve, Perak inFebruary 1996: a first successful
breeding record for Malaysia. Asian Raptor Bull. 3: 19-20.
Clunie, F. ( 1 972) A contribution to the natural history of the Fiji peregrine.
Notomis 19: 302-322.
Dottiinger, H. (2002) The Black Shaheen Falcon ( Falco peregrinus
peregrinator SUNDEVALL 1837), its morphology, geographic
variation and the history and ecology of the Sri Lanka (Ceylon)
populations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent, U.K.
Dottiinger, H. and Nicholls, M. (2005) Distribution and population
trends of the ‘black shaheen’ Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
peregrinator and the eastern Peregrine Falcon F. p. calidus in Sri
Lanka. Forktail 21: 133-138.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London: Christopher Helm.
Jeyarajasingam, A. and Pearson, S. (1999 )A field guide to the birds of west
Malaysia and Singapore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monneret, R.-J. (2000) Le faucon pelerin. Second edition. Lausanne,
Switzerland: Delachaux and Niestle.
Noack, F. (2002) Breeding Peregrine Falcons in Perlis State Park.
Suara Enggang 2: 18-19.
Ratcliffe, D. A. (1993) The Peregrine Falcon. Second edition. London:
T. and A. D. Poyser.
Sherrod, S. K. (1983) Behavior of fledgling peregrines. Boise, Idaho:
Peregrine Fund.
Wells, D. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Volume 1.
London: Academic Press.
White, C. M., Brimm, D. J. and Clunie, F. (1988) A study of peregrines
in the Fiji Islands, South Pacific Ocean. Pp. 275-287 in T. J. Cade,
J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander and C. M. White, eds. Peregrine
Falcon populations: their management and recovery. Boise, Idaho:
Peregrine Fund.
White, C. M., Brimm, D. J. and Wetton, J. H. (2000) The Peregrine
Falcon Falco peregrinus in Fiji and Vanuatu. Pp. 707-720 in R. D.
Chancellor and B.-U. Meyburg, eds. Raptors at risk: Proceedings of
Fifth World Conference on Birds of Prey and Ozvls. Surrey, B.C.,
Canada: Hancock House.
White, C. M., Olsen, P. D. and ICiff, L. F. (1994) Family
Falconidae. Pp. 216-275 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal,
eds. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 2. Barcelona, Spain:
Lynx Edicions.
Laurent Molard, 17 rue George Bernard Shaw, 75015 Paris, France. Email: mymolard@yahoo.com
Marc Kery, Swiss Ornithological Institute, 6204 Sempach, Switzerland. Email: marc.kery@vogelwarte.ch
Clayton M. White, Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 U.S.A.
Email: Clayton _Wltite@byu. edu
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 92-101
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China:
results from winter waterbird surveys 2003-2007
LEE KWOK SHING, CHAN BOSCO PUI LOK, LU GANG and SU WEN-BA
Four simultaneous winter waterbird surveys were conducted island-wide on Hainan island, China, between 2003 and 2007, during which
a total of 83 species of wetland-associated birds were recorded at 57 coastal and freshwater wetlands. The most abundant species were
egrets and herons, followed by shorebirds, gulls and terns, and ducks. A new wintering site for the globally Endangered Black-faced
Spoonbill Platalea minor was discovered, and the largest known populations in China of Lesser Whistling-duck Dendrocygna javanica and
Silky Starling Stumus sericeus were found. Twelve taxa were new records for Hainan: Mandarin Duck HA galericulata, Mallard Anas
platyrhynchos , Northern ShovelerH. clypeata, Northern Pintail A. acuta , Tufted Duck Ay thy a fuligula. Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta.
Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis , Long-billed/Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus! griseus , Ruff Philomachus pugnax.
Black-tailed Gull Lams crassirostris, Heuglin’s Gull Larus heuglini , and Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia. In addition, three species
were ‘rediscovered’ for the island: Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii, White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster, and the globally Near
Threatened Lesser Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis. Five sites of high conservation value were identified: Dongzhaigang, Qinglanggang,
Sigeng, Yangpugang and Guyue Villa. Hainan occupies a strategic position along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway and so the diverse
and extensive wetland habitats on the island are of great importance for Asian waterbird conservation. However, many sites with high
conservation value are not yet protected, and the survey results indicate general declines in both species diversity and abundance. Better
management and enforcement at protected sites, greater survey efforts in little-known areas, and establishment of protected areas at sites
of conservation significance are crucial for the conservation of Hainan’s wetlands.
INTRODUCTION
Hainan island lies within the tropics at 18°09'-20°1 TN
108°36 -1 1 1°04'E and has a land area of c. 33, 600 km2.
Hainan is separated from continental China by the
Qiongzhou Straits, and is bordered on the west and north¬
west by the Gulf of Tonkin (Beibu Gulf) and on other
sides by the South China Sea. The nearest landmass, the
Leizhou Peninsula in south-western Guangdong province,
lies only 20 km to the north, while the Red River Delta of
Vietnam is c.200 km to the west. Hainan has extensive
wetland habitats. There are c.2,500 km2 of inland waters
(including rivers and natural/artificial standing waters),
while the coastline measures 1,618 km with 68 natural
bays and c. 1,800 km2 of mudflats (Hainan Survey and
Mapping Bureau 1996) . The 54 km2 Dongzhaigang ( gang
= port) National Nature Reserve (NNR), in north-eastern
Hainan, has the best remaining mature mangroves in
China, and has been designated as a Ramsar Site (Ramsar
Convention on Wetlands) since 1992. The coastline of
Hainan is also part of a ‘key wetland region for threatened
birds in Asia’ defined by BirdLife International (2003).
Robert Swinhoe’s pioneering visit in 1868 (Swinhoe
1870) first demonstrated Hainan’s rich waterbird
diversity. Swinhoe recorded 47 waterbird species,
including such present-day rarities as Common Crane
Grus grus and Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus.
Waterbirds were again prominent among specimens
collected during 1891-1906 by Tetsu, John Whitehead
and Zensaku Katsumata, notable species being White¬
eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus , Painted Stork
Mycteria leucocephala and Great Thick-knee Esacus
recurvirostris (Hartlaub 1892, Styan 1893, 1894, Ogilvie-
Grant 1900, Hartert 1910). Further additions to the
island’s waterbirds were listed by Shaw Tsen-hwang and
Hsu Wei-shu (1966), Guangdong Institute of Entomology
and Zhongshan University (1983), King and Liao Wei-
ping (1989) and Gao Yuren (1991). In recent years,
nesting ardeids were surveyed one summer (Wong and
Wong 2004), and preliminary studies were made at
Qinglangang Nature Reserve (NR) and a small number
of other wetland sites (Zou Fasheng et al. 2000, Zou
Fasheng 2005). A list of the island’s birds, including 98
wetland-associated species, was provided by Shi Haitao
(2001). Despite these studies, no systematic winter
waterbird surveys had been conducted prior to those
described in this paper.
At the invitation of the Hainan Wildlife Conservation
Centre of the Hainan Provincial Forestry Department
(HWCC), ornithologists from several organisations
conducted synchronised winter waterbird surveys island¬
wide. The first, in 2003/04, aimed to collect preliminary
data to better understand the current status of Hainan’s
waterbirds and wetlands. The second survey, based on
results collected in 2003/4, was more specific, aiming to
study the distribution and status of the globally
Endangered Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor , and
also to coincide with the annual Asian Waterbird Census
(AWC) organised by Wetlands International. The third
and fourth surveys, in 2006 and 2007, focussed on sites
of high conservation importance identified during the
earlier surveys, and to confirm the continued occurrence
of species of conservation concern.
STUDY SITES AND METHODS
A total of 5 7 wetlands were visited during the four surveys
(Fig. 1, Table 1); habitats visited ranged from rivers,
paddy fields and freshwater marshes to reservoirs, and
from brackish-water ponds and mangroves to intertidal
mudflats. Over 20 personnel were involved in each survey,
led by HWCC with participation from the Hong Kong-
based environmental charity Kadoorie Farm and Botanic
Garden (KFBG), members of the Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society, the University of Hong Kong, the
National Bird Banding Centre of China (Beijing) and
Hainan Normal University. In the first survey, from 29
December 2003 to 5 January 2004, the group separated
into three teams to survey wetlands along the coast, as
Forktail 23 (2007)
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China
93
Figure 1. Map showing wetland sites visited during the Hainan winter waterbird surveys, 2003-2007. Site numbers correspond to those
in Table 1 .
well as freshwater habitats in the island’s interior. Selection
of study sites was based mainly on the size of the wetlands:
larger wetlands with less human disturbance, which thus
had a higher chance of harbouring concentrations of
waterbirds, were selected. Other sites (such as Guyue
Villa) known to support significant waterbird populations
were also surveyed. In the second survey of 20-23 January
2005, two teams surveyed along the coastline
concentrating on shorebirds. The third survey, conducted
in January 2006, consisted of a Black-faced Spoonbill
survey during 6-8 January and a synchronised island¬
wide survey by three teams during 19-22 January. The
fourth survey, conducted during 18-22 and 28 January
2007, had two teams surveying along the coastline and
inland freshwater habitats simultaneously. A total of eight,
three, four and six field days were spent in 2003/4, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively. During the surveys, visual
searching was the main method used. In most cases, cars
were used to conduct road transects, and telescopes were
used to scan for birds in open areas. Once flocks were
identified, the teams approached the birds on foot or by
boat, to enable identification and counting.
RESULTS
A total of 83 wetland-associated birds were recorded
during the surveys, including 74 species of waterbird.
The annual totals were as follows: 72 species in 2003/4;
55 in 2005; 58 in 2006; and 50 in 2007. See the Appendix
for the full species list.
Composition of the waterbird fauna
Of the 83 species recorded, 24 are residents (28.9% of
the total) and 59 are winter visitors (71.1%). The most
numerous were egrets and herons, followed by
shorebirds, gulls and terns, and ducks. The most
widespread and abundant species, in both coastal and
freshwater wetlands, was Little Egret Egretta garzetta ,
followed by Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus. The
sites with the highest number of individuals were
Dongzhaigang NNR, Qinglangang NR and Y angpugang;
these, together with Sigeng NR, Houshui Bay and Sanya
River NR, were among the most species-rich sites for
waterbirds in Hainan. T able 2 summarises the key findings
of the surveys.
94
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China
95
Table 2. Key findings of Hainan winter waterbird surveys, 2003-2007 (excluding wetland-associated species).
96
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Species accounts
The following species accounts cover species that are
either listed as globally Threatened or Near Threatened
by IUCN (2006) or new to Hainan island, or for which
otherwise noteworthy records were made.
Lesser Whistling-duck Dendrocygna javanica
A total of 1 , 1 80 were recorded ( 1 , 1 00 at Guyue Villa and
80 at a nearby fishpond) in Qiongzhong county on 31
December 2003. About 600 were recorded at Guyue Villa
on 19 January 2006. During the 2007 survey, no ducks
were seen at this site because the pond was temporarily
drained at the time. The ducks apparently dispersed to
surrounding waterbodies following this disturbance, with
1 20 counted at Dongshanhu Reservoir, about 80 km north¬
east of Guyue Villa, and c.600 recorded at Muse Reservoir,
about 5 km to the north-east. Although stated as fairly
common locally and distributed in southern Guangdong,
Guangxi, Yunnan and Hainan in China (Cheng Tso-hsin
1987), there has been no record of this species in Yunnan
and Guangxi in recent decades, and only solitary
individuals (of doubtful origin) were seen in Guangdong
and Hong Kong in recent years. The only Hainan records
prior to the sightings presented here concern a series of
specimens collected at Dinggan and ‘Riudon’ (untraced
locality in the interior) in April and May between 1902
and 1906 (Hartert 1910) and in Qionghai and Dinggan
counties between March and July, 1960 to 1964
(Guangdong Institute of Entomology and Zhongshan
University 1983), which suggests that this was then, as
now, a highly localised species restricted to the north¬
eastern part of the island. A local population of 1,180
birds is thus of high national conservation significance
and is apparently the largest congregation of this species
Plate 1. Female Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata at Guyue Villa (#38),
Qiongzhong county, 31 December 2003. Photo by Lee Kwok Shing.
Plate 2. First winter Black-tailed Gull Lams crassirostris at Qinglangang
NR (#27), Wenchang county, on 19 January 2006. Photo by Lu Gang.
ever recorded in China (Han Lianxian verbally 2005).
Considered a summer breeder in Hainan by Meyer de
Schauensee (1984) and MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000),
and a migrant by Cheng T so-hsin (1987), the winter survey
results presented in this paper, our repeated observation
records in spring, summer and autumn outside the scope
of this study since 2001 till today, as well as assurance of
its breeding (and collecting of their eggs) by local villagers
of the site, suggest the species is a resident, as suggested
by Guangdong Institute of Entomology and Zhongshan
University (1983).
Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata
One female was seen at Guyue Villa with the flock of
Lesser Whistling-ducks on 31 December 2003 (Plate 1).
This is a new record for Hainan.
MALLARD Anas platyrhynchos
One was seen at Houshui Bay on 31 Dec 2003. This is a
new record for Hainan.
Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata
Sixteen were recorded at Dongzhaigang NNR and two at
Sangao Reservoir in 2003/04. Ten were recorded at
Sangao Reservoir in 2005 and ten at Dongzhaigang NNR
in 2007. These are new records for Hainan.
Northern Pintail Anas acuta
A total of 421 birds were recorded at three sites (400 at
Sangao Reservoir, 20 at Houshui Bay and one at Sigeng
NR) in 2003/4. In 2005, ten were recorded at Sangao
Reservoir. Eleven were recorded at Dongzhaigang NNR
in 2007. These are new records for Hainan.
Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula
Four were recorded at Dongzhaigang NNR and four were
recorded at Sangao Reservoir in 2003/4. Two were
recorded at Sangao Reservoir in 2006. These are new
records for Hainan. In Hong Kong, a marked increase in
this species has been observed, with peak winter counts
rising more than 12-fold, from 132 prior to the winter of
1995/96 to 1,600 in 2005/6 (Yu Yat Tung verbally 2006).
PlED Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta
One was seen at Sigeng NR on 21 January 2007. This is
a new record for Hainan.
EASTERN Curlew Numenius madagascariensis
One was seen at Dongzhaigang NNR on 29 December
2003. This is a new record for Hainan.
LONG-BILLED/SHORT-BILLED DOWITCHER Limnodromus
scolopaceusl griseus
A dowitcher, either Long-billed or Short-billed
Limnodromus scolopaceus or L. griseus, was seen at Fengjia
Bay, Wenchang county, on 20 January 2006. Experience
in Hong Kong shows that winter-plumaged Long-billed
and Short-billed Dowitchers cannot be identified to
species under field condition unless the diagnostic call is
heard (R. Lewthwaite verbally 2006); unfortunately the
individual seen was too far from the observers and no call
was heard. Although Short-billed Dowitcher is very rare
in East Asia and much less likely to occur in Hainan than
Long-billed Dowitcher, no assumptions can be made.
The genus Limnodromus has never been reported from
Forktail 23 (2007)
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China
97
Hainan, thus the sighting represents a new record for the
island.
RUFF Philomachus pugnax
One male was seen at Dongzhaigang NNR on 29
December 2003, and a male and a female were seen at
Sigeng NR on 22 January 2005. These are new records
for Hainan.
Black-tailed Gull Larns crassirostris
Seven were recorded (one at Qinglangang NR, one at
Houshui Bay and five at Yangpugang) on 19 and 20
January 2006 (Plate 2) . These are new records for Hainan.
HEUGLIN’S Gull Lams heuglini
A total of 171 (nine at Houshui Bay, 87 at Fengjia Bay,
60 at Yangpugang and 15 at Sigeng NR) were recorded
during 19-22 January 2006, and a total of 34 (30 at
Qinglangang NR, two at Y angpugang and two at Houshui
Bay) were found on 19 and 22 January 2007. These are
the first records of this species for Hainan following its
split from the Herring Gull complex.
Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii
Three were recorded at Y angpugang on 22 January 2007 .
This is the first record for the island for many years; the
last Hainan Island records were from Lingshui county,
on the south-eastern coast, in the months of July and
September (year not stated: Guangdong Institute of
Entomology and Zhongshan University 1983), and all
other records in China during 2004 were from the period
April-August (China Ornithological Society 2005). The
record presented here, in January, from the northern side
of the island, is thus of interest.
Black Kite Milvus migrans
A total of 62 (five sites), 7 (two sites), 7 (three sites) and
5 (two sites) individuals were recorded during winter
waterbird surveys in 2003/4, 2005, 2006 and 2007
respectively. This species was described by Swinhoe
(1870) as ‘abundant everywhere in Hainan’. Although
individuals can still be observed in low-lying areas
throughout the island, our results indicate the species has
undergone a dramatic decline on Hainan Island, as has
been observed elsewhere throughout the species’s range.
See Inskipp et al. (1996) for changes in its nomenclature.
Lesser Fish Eagle Ichthyophaga humilis
One was seen at Songtao Reservoir, Danzhou county, on
1 January 2004. The bird was observed for three minutes
while foraging over the reservoir. This species appears to
be naturally rare on the island; the only previous original
Hainan records seem to be based on specimens collected
at Liuwowan (= Lumuwan, the south-eastern side of
Songtao Reservoir) on 15 December 1891 (Styan 1893)
and Wuzhishan (four) in November during 1902-1906
(Hartert 1910). All sightings were made in winter. Songtao
is the largest reservoir on the island, and the catchment
area is protected by Panjia (including part of Lumuwan)
NR, with extensive secondary lowland rainforest. The
species is listed as globally Near Threatened (IUCN 2006) .
White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster
One juvenile was seen at Daguangba Reservoir, Dongfang
county, on 2 1 January 2006. The bird was photographed
perching on a tree. Daguangba is the second largest
reservoir on the island, and the catchment area is protected
by Houmiling NR and the proposed E’xianling limestone
forest nature reserve, with extensive rainforest cover. The
species had not been reported from the island for several
decades prior to this sighting.
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia
One was seen together with Black-faced Spoonbills at
Sigeng NR on 5 January 2004 and 21 January 2006.
Besides this, one was photographed at Houshui Bay in
April 2004 (by LG, not as part of the surveys reported).
These are new records for Hainan.
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor
The species was first collected at Haikou city in February
1 903 (Hartert 1910) but no individuals were subsequently
seen in Hainan until small numbers were found in the
nearby Dongzhaigang NNR and Houshui Bay in the
1990s. During the 2003/4 survey, a total of 62 (1 at
Dongzhaigang, 1 0 at Houshui Bay and 5 1 at Sigeng NR)
were recorded. In 2005, a total of 77 (9 at Houshui Bay
and 68 at Sigeng NR) were recorded. In 2006, a total of
81 (1 at Dongzhaigang NNR, 5 at Houshui Bay and 75
at Sigeng NR) were recorded. In 2007, a total of 74 (66
at Sigeng NR and 8 at Houshui Bay) were recorded,
including 36 individuals of the Sigeng population that
visited nearby Changhuagang. During 2004-2007, the
Sigeng population represented over 4% of the global
population of the species (Yu Yat Tung verbally 2007).
The species is listed as globally Endangered by IUCN
(2006).
Silky Starling Stumus sericeus
A total of 2,293, 48 1 and 11,160 were recorded in 2003/
04, 2005 and 2006, respectively, with the vast majority
concentrated around Dongzhaigang NNR. The species
is described as an abundant but localised (the vast majority
concentrated around the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar
Site) winter visitor to Hong Kong, with a peak count of
3,000 in December 1994 (Carey et. al. 2001). Hong Kong
was previously thought to hold the largest population in
China, but the count of 1 1,160 in Hainan is almost four
times larger. The major roosting site by Dongzhaigang
NNR was not visited in 2007 due to time constraints.
DISCUSSION
Comparison with the Hong Kong Winter Waterbird
Count
Hong Kong, c.420 km north-east of Hainan, has had
annual winter waterbird counts since 1979. With similar
size and habitats to Dongzhaigang NNR on Hainan, Mai
Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site in Hong Kong
regularly holds around 50,000 waterbirds each winter. At
Dongzhaigang NNR, however, only about 350-1,500
waterbirds were recorded each winter during the study
period. Even the total number of waterbirds recorded in
each winter throughout Hainan, which is over 30 times
the size of Hong Kong, was far less than at the Mai Po and
Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site in Hong Kong alone.
Nevertheless, a number of waterbird species on the Hainan
list have never been recorded in Hong Kong: White-eared
Night Heron, Lesser Adjutant, Painted Stork, Lesser Fish
98
LEE KWOK SHING et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Eagle, Great Thick-knee and River Lapwing Vanellus
duvaucelii. However, except for Lesser Fish Eagle, none
of these was found during our surveys and it has been
decades since they were last recorded.
There appear to be differences in seasonality for some
migratory marsh terns and shorebirds between Hainan
and Hong Kong. Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus ,
White-winged Tern C. leucopterus, Whimbrel Numenius
phaeopus , Terek Sandpiper Xenus cinereus, Ruddy
Turnstone Arenaria interpres. Long-toed Stint Calidris
subminuta , Curlew Sandpiper C. ferruginea , Lesser Sand
Plover Charadrius mongolus and Greater Sand Plover
C. leschenaultii were recorded in quite good numbers in
the Hainan winter surveys but are absent or near-absent
in winter in Hong Kong, occurring mainly as passage
migrants. Also, numbers of Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx
intermedia recorded were higher for Hainan than in Hong
Kong. Four species that are numerous in Hong Kong
during winter were either absent or occurred in very small
numbers during the Hainan surveys: Great Cormorant
Phalacrocorax carbo (one in four years), Great Crested
Grebe Podiceps cristatus (none), Common Coot Fulica
atm (none) and Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa (highest
annual count of 1 6 in 2003/4) . The numbers and diversity
of ducks and gulls were also much lower on Hainan than
in Hong Kong.
Conservation
Hainan Island is situated on the East Asian-Australasian
Flyway, and holds a large area of different wetland types.
The occurrence of a globally significant population of
Black-faced Spoonbill in Hainan, especially at Sigeng
NR in the west of the island, is of particular conservation
significance. However, our results indicate that numbers
and species richness of waterbirds and other wetland-
dependent birds have declined significantly since historical
times (as inferred from references in the later 19th and
first half of the 20th century). A number of wetland-
dependent bird species that we expected to find, on the
basis of historical records, were not recorded during the
surveys, notably Bean Goos eAnserfabalis (only recorded
by Shaw Tsen-hwang and Hsu Wei-shu 1966), Cotton
Pygmy-goose Nettapus coromandelianus (only recorded
by Hartert 1910), Baikal Teal Anas formosa, Falcated
Duck A falcata, Common Crane (described by Swinhoe
1870 as ‘abundant on the plains’ of northern Hainan),
Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus. Greater
Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis. Great Thick-knee
(listed by Gao Yuren [1991] as occurring in November
and December at Puqian and Wenchang), Spot-billed
Pelican Pelecanus philippensis , Chinese Egret Egretta
eulophotes, Purple Heron Ardea purpurea , Black Bittern
Dupetor flavicollis, Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris, Lesser
Adjutant (only recorded by Swinhoe 1870), Painted Stork
and Black-headed Ibis Threskiomis melanocephalus (both
only recorded by Hartert 1910). There appears to be a
general decline in species richness and total bird number
even within the four-year survey period (Table 2, although
note differences in survey effort). While this probably
reflects the effects of hunting and habitat degradation
over the decades, and mirrors general global population
declines for the large-bodied species, constraints on the
surveys, in terms of weather conditions and survey effort,
may also have affected the results, as very limited time
was available. For example, Black Bittern, Pheasant-tailed
Jacana and Greater Painted-snipe have been recently
recorded on Hainan island outside the surveys presented
here; these records will be reported elsewhere.
Large-scale habitat destruction and potentially
deleterious human activities were regularly observed
during the surveys. During the 2005 survey, several of the
mangrove stands visited in 2003/4 had been cleared for
aquaculture. Bird nets/traps, fishing nets, cages and
collection of edible worms were frequently encountered
on the mudflats. Guyue Villa, a privately-owned artificial
lake targeting tourism, had a healthy community of
freshwater wetland birds. However, a lack of tourism
revenue saw the owner draining the lake and clearing
lakeside vegetation (which is a breeding site for the largest
population of Lesser Whistling-duck in China), in order
to construct more ‘attractions’ in 2005, and for freshwater
aquaculture in 2007. Protection of these habitats is
particularly urgent, especially given habitat loss and
instability elsewhere in the region (e.g. BirdLife
International 2003). Human disturbance directly
influences the carrying capacity of many sites; very few
birds were recorded in large areas of seemingly suitable
habitats, many of these could potentially hold much higher
wintering bird populations if the degree of human
disturbance was reduced.
Recommendations
Although the surveys revealed the general trends of
waterbirds in Hainan, the status of many species, especially
species associated with freshwater habitats, remains poorly
known . In particular, very few riverine habitats were visited
during our survey, and freshwater wetlands were under¬
sampled. Thus, the status of some rare freshwater
specialists known from Hainan, such as White-eared Night
Heron, Crested Kingfisher Megaceryle lugubris, Brown
Fish Owl Ketupa zeylonensis and River Lapwing, could
not be determined. There are also extensive coastal
habitats that were not covered, especially sandy/rocky
shores. The fact that some species previously recorded on
Hainan but unrecorded during the surveys (e.g. Cotton
Pygmy-goose and Pheasant-tailed Jacana) are visitors to
the island outside of the survey periods may also explain
their apparent absence. There is certainly a need for further
surveys, especially in the numerous freshwater habitats
and along deserted stretches of shoreline. Further bird
species will doubtless be added to the list with extra effort,
as suggested by the species accumulation curve over the
four-year study period (Fig. 2), which does not yet appear
to have levelled off.
Figure 2. Species accumulation curve of Hainan winter waterbird
surveys over the four-year survey period.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China
99
Following the discovery of the important populations
of Black-faced Spoonbill at Sigeng NR and Lesser
Whistling-duck at Guyue Villa, the former site has been
designated a wetland nature reserve and regular
monitoring of the latter site is being conducted. Such
steps are very important since only four (Dongzhaigang,
Qinglanggang, Sigeng and Sanya River) out of the 57
surveyed sites are formally protected. It is imperative that
other sites of conservation significance (e.g. Yangpugang,
Guyue Villa, Houshui Bay and Changhuagang) are
protected in the near future, if Hainan’s rich wetland
avifauna is to be preserved and to recover. There also
needs to be a conservation strategy for wetland ecosystems
of Hainan as a whole, with better management plans and
enforcement efforts to tackle the problems of habitat
encroachment and poaching. Community work aimed at
providing livelihood alternatives for local people without
depleting natural resources may provide the most cost-
effective and sustainable option on an island scale.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to all members of the Hainan waterbird survey team,
especially volunteers Mike Kilburn, Carrie Ma, Samson So, Jemi Wong
and Ying Hak King of Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Song Yik
Hey of the University of Hong Kong, Zhang Guogang of the National
Bird Banding Center of China (Beijing) and Liang Wei of Hainan
Normal University for their enthusiastic participation. John Fellowes
of KFBG and Yu Yat Tung of Hong Kong Bird Watching Society gave
valuable comments on earlier drafts. We are indebted to two anonymous
referees for their painstaking contributions to this paper. This work has
been funded by HWCC and KFBG.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2003) Saving Asia’s threatened birds: a guide for
government and civil society. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
China Ornithological Society (2005) China bird report 2004. Beijing:
China Ornithological Society.
Gao Yuren (1991) The distribution of Charadriiformes in the
Guangdong Region, China. Stilt 18: 25-28.
Guangdong Institute of Entomology and Zhongshan University (1983)
Birds and beasts of Hainan island. Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese.)
Hainan Survey and Mapping Bureau (1996) Atlas of Hainan Province.
Chengdu: Chengdu Map Press. (In Chinese.)
Hartert, E. (1910) The birds of Hainan. Novitates Zoologicae 27: 189-
254.
Hartlaub, G. (1892). Ein Beitrag zur Omithologie Chinas. Abhandl.
Naturw. Ver. Bremen 12 (2): 295-335.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated checklist
of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded
from www.redlist.org on 03 December 2006.
King, B. and Liao Wei-ping (1989) Hainan Island bird notes. Hong
Kong Bird Report 1 988: 88-10 1 .
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. Oxford, U.K.:
Oxford University Press.
Ogilvie-Grant, R. (1900) On the birds of Hainan. Proc. Zool. Soc. Land.
1900: 457-504.
Shaw T sen-Hwang and Hsu Wei-Shu (1966) On the birds of Hainan.
I. Non-passeriformes. Acta Zoologica Sinica 18(1): 93-112. (In
Chinese with English abstract.)
Shi Haitao, ed. (2001) A guide to Hainan terrestrial vertebrates. Hainan:
Hainan Press.
Styan (1893) On the birds of Hainan. Ibis (6)5: 424-437.
Styan (1894) Notes on the ornithology of China. Ibis (6)6: 329-337.
Swinhoe R. (1870) On the ornithology of Hainan. Ibis: (2)6: 77-97;
230-256; 342-367.
Wong, J. Y. P. and Wong, C. (2004). Nest abundance of ardeids in
Hainan 2004. Porcupine! 31: 10-12.
Zou Fasheng, ed. (2005) Wetlands in Hainan Island. Guangzhou:
Guangdong Science and T echnology Press. (In Chinese with English
abstract.)
Zou Fasheng, Song Xiaojun, Chen Kang, Liang Y ong and Xu Dahong
(2000) A preliminary study on avian ecology in mangrove wetland
of Qinglanggang, Hainan. Chinese Biodiversity 8(3): 307-3 1 1 . (In
Chinese with English abstract.)
Lee Kwok Shing, Chan Bosco Pui Lok and Lit Gang, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, China Programme, Lam Kam
Road, Tai Po, N.T., Hong Kong. E-mail: cp@kfbg.org
Su Wen-ba, Hainan Provincial Forestry Department, Hainan Wildlife Conservation Centre, 80 Haifa Road, Haikou,
Haitian, China, Postcode 570203.
APPENDIX
Total number of birds recorded during the Hainan winter waterbird surveys, 2003-2007. EN = Endangered, NT = Near Threatened. Site
numbers correspond to those in Table 1.
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 1
3
100 LEE KWOK SHING et al. Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Wetland birds of Hainan Island, China
101
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 102-124
Selected records from Socheong Island,
South Korea
NIAL MOORES
Socheong Island, South Korea, is especially well positioned to provide valuable insights into bird migration and seabird status in both
South Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Details are given of ornithologically significant records made on the island
between October 2002 and October 2005, including six species recorded for the first time on the Korean peninsula: ‘Steppe’ Grey Shrike
Lanins ( meridionalis ) pallidirostris, Chinese Thrush Turdus mupinensis, Yellow-bellied Tit Pants venustulus, Tickell’s LeafWarbler Phylloscopus
ajfinis , Chinese LeafWarbler Phylloscopus yunnanensis and Scaly-breasted Munia Lonchura punctulata.
INTRODUCTION
The Korean peninsula (= territory of the Republic of Korea
or South Korea, and the Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea, DPRK, combined, including marine areas and
islands) received relatively superficial ornithological
exploration until fairly recently, with the birds of DPRK
remaining particularly poorly known (Tomek 1999, 2002).
Although recent observations have added several new
species to the DPRK list (Duckworth 2004), and revised
the status of several dozen others (Duckworth 2006), there
is still very limited available information on the status of
many species, especially in coastal and offshore areas.
In South Korea, a gradual but accelerating increase in
ornithological activity in the second half of the twentieth
century led to a corresponding growth in the national
checklist, with 337 species listed by Austin (1948; but
excluding Jeju island), 366 by Gore and Won (1971), and
438 species by Lee et al. (2000), the latter containing an
increased number of species known from South Korea
only by sight records, as well as an abbreviated status code
for each species. Subsequently, an unpublished thesis (Park
Jin-Young 2002) presented dates and locations of
specimens from South Korea and most sight records known
to that author, either published or contained in unpublished
trip reports.
Since 2002, work by the conservation organisation Birds
Korea has led to the production of a regularly revised internet-
based national checklist (containing over 500 species by
2006). In the continuing absence of a national rarities
committee, and with the increase in recreational
birdwatching not only outpacing opportunities for
publication of significant records but also improving greatly
on the understanding of status, Birds Korea’s websites present
information and images received from a large number of
observers, as well as comments elicited from experienced
observers on difficult identifications. Annual online reviews
produced by the organisation (Moores and Moores 2002,
2003, 2004a, 2005) contain mostly sight records, with many
from ferries and offshore islands in the Korean part of the
Yellow Sea, especially Socheong Island, Ongjin Gun,
Incheon municipality (37°45'N 124°44'E), Eocheong
Island, Gunsan, Jeollabuk province (36°08'N 125°58,E),
Hong Island, Jeollanam province (34°4 1 TM 1 25° 1 3'E) and
Gageo Island, Jeollanam province, (34°03'N 125°09,E).
These records have greatly advanced our understanding of
the national status of a wide range of migrant species.
This paper lists significant observations from Socheong
Island over c.175 dates of observation during October
2002-October 2005, including the same species’
occurrence in open sea areas of Gyeonggi Bay, lying
between Socheong Island and Incheon Port. It omits
records at sea for species so far unrecorded from Socheong
Island itself.
Socheong Island is the southernmost and smallest of
three closely grouped, remote, South Korean islands in
the Yellow (or West) Sea, lying c.200 km west-north¬
west of Incheon city and mainland South Korea, 40 km
west and south of the mainland of Hwanghaenam
province, DPRK, and 200 km east-north-east of the
western tip of the Shandong peninsula, Shandong
province, China. Its location and size mean that it is
especially well positioned to provide valuable insights
into bird migration, and seabird status, both in coastal
DPRK and South Korea.
The island was first surveyed, with a focus on raptors,
in mid-October 2002, and then by NM counting all bird
species on 130 dates (including 42 part-days with ferry
journeys between Incheon and Socheong) between May
2003 and October 2005. At least 35 observers visited the
island up to October 2005, the majority accompanying
NM, identifying at least 298 species on the island in total
(see Appendix).
This paper details records on Socheong Island of 122
species, selected on the basis of one or more criteria:
species of global conservation concern (i.e., listed as
threatened or Near Threatened by BirdLife International
2006); species not included in Lee et al. (2000); species
recorded ten times or fewer in Gyeonggi province
(including Incheon municipality), South Korea, according
to Park (2002); and based on Tomek (1999, 2002) and
Duckworth (2006) species either (a) with six or fewer
DPRK records up to 1998, or (b) with only one or no
records between 1975 and 1998 in DPRK.
Records were made by NM except where stated.
Specific dates are provided for all species meeting one of
the preceding criteria and recorded six times or fewer on
Socheong. Peak counts and more general observations
are provided for more regularly occurring species,
including the number of dates the species was recorded
in both spring and autumn. In many cases, such data can
be presented clearly; in a few cases, data provided by
other observers were insufficiently detailed in this regard.
For all species, context of their status on the Korean
peninsula (i.e. in South Korea and DPRK) with a special
emphasis on Gyeonggi province and the Yellow Sea is
provided by comparison with Park (2002), Tomek ( 1 999,
2002), and Duckworth (2004, 2006).
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
103
METHODS
Observations were made with 8x binoculars and a
telescope with 20-60 x eyepiece, and were often supported
by digital photography. NM made observations during:
22-26 March 2003; 13-16, 26-29 April 2004; 14-21
May 2004, 16-23 May 2005, 26-31 May 2003, with
records from Klemens Steiof during 1-5 May 2004; from
Kenji Mochizuki during 1-5 May 2005, 1-3 June 2004,
1-4 June 2005, 18-23 August 2004; from Thomas
Heinicke and Jurgen Steudtner during 9-1 1 August 2004,
4-9, 13-23 September 2004, 23-26 September 2003;
from Park Jin-Young over 3-4 September 2004; from
Fergus Crystal from 1 5 September to 4 October 2005, 1—
3, 24-31 October 2003, 4-19, 31 October 2004, 20-30
October 2005; from Kim Dong-Won in mid-October
2002, and from Toshikazu Onishi, Yozo Koshiyama,
Atsushi Igari, Tim Edelsten and Robin Newlin during
15-23 October 2005, 1 November 2003, 2-3, 5-13
November 2004, and 14-16 December 2003.
Bird observations by NM tended to be made along a
circuit through the main habitat types. Socheong Island
is c.4.5 km in length and c. 1 km in width, oriented on a
south-west-north-east axis, with the South Korean islands
of Daecheong (37°48'N 124°40'E) and Baekryeong
(37°58'N 124°38,E) lying close to the north, the DPRK
coast to the east and north, and open sea to the south and
west. It is hilly, rather than mountainous, with two low
peaks (the highest of which reaches 174 m), and two
villages, both with a few arable fields. Most of the island
is rather heavily vegetated, with much secondary woodland
(areas of pine, mixed, and deciduous woodland, much of
which has been coppiced), intermixed with more open
grasses and low shrubs, formerly heavily grazed by goats.
Much of the coastline is rocky and there is little permanent
wetland on the island, with only five largely modified
streams, and one small beach with a very small sandy-
mud tidal-flat of c. 1 ha exposed at low tides. As it is not
possible to cover the whole island in a single day, survey
circuits concentrated on the south-western two-thirds of
the island, especially in areas with water, shelter, sunlight
or high bird activity, covering all the main habitat types
described above. In clear conditions, prolonged counting
of diurnal migrants (especially raptors and hirundines)
was conducted from a hill peak (with other habitats
covered less well), while in rain or when heavily overcast,
greater effort was made searching for grounded migrants
in the far south-west of the island.
RESULTS
At least 298 species were recorded (see Appendix), with
122 of particular ornithological interest to either South
Korea, DPRK or the Korean peninsula as a whole. Eight
species are classified as Near Threatened, seven as
Vulnerable and one as Endangered. The records include
six species new for the Korean peninsula, and the first
presumed breeding record of one more (Light-vented
Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis).
Selected species accounts
Japanese Quail Cotumix japonica
Noted on 23 dates: seven times in spring, between 24
March and 19 May, and 1 6 times in autumn, between 20
September and 13 November. Most records involved
single birds, with peak counts of five on 1 2 April, three on
6 October and three on 12 November, all in 2004.
Considered a ‘common autumn transient through
Korea’ by Austin (1948), Park (2002) traced specimens
from five provinces, including 14 from Gyeonggi (all
between October and April, apart from one collected in
August 1957), but only one sight record from there.
Although Tomek (1999) traced multiple records for
DPRK, only one was post-1975, on 15 December 1989.
BLACK Scoter Melanitta nigra
Recorded on several dates between 7 November and 16
April, with a peak of 1 5 on 13 November 2004. Twenty
were noted between Socheong and neighbouring
Daecheong Island on 14 December 2003, indicating local
wintering.
Although Tomek (1999) traced 1 1 records for DPRK
(with only four records in the last 50 years), she found no
recent records for the DPRK part of the West Sea. Park
(2002) listed two specimens from Gyeonggi province and
one sight record there, 1 8 near Baekryeong Island during
18-20 April 1998, and sight records from three other
provinces in South Korea.
Yellow-legged Buttonquail Tumix tanki
One record in spring (on 15 May 2004), and records in
autumn on c.15 dates during at least 4 September-28
October, mostly singles, with a peak count of four (on 2 1
September 2004).
Tomek (1999) traced only eight records from DPRK.
Park (2002) listed only three sight records for South Korea
(one of which was in Gyeonggi province), with those all
between 1 993 and 200 1 , but also 1 2 specimens collected
in Gyeonggi province, including five during 13-15 July
1964 in Namyangju city.
Eurasian Wryneck Jynx torquilla
Recorded ten times, in spring (on four dates between 12
and 28 April), and in autumn, on six dates between 21
August and 22 September, with the highest numbers being
three on 12 April 2004 and again on 27 April 2004.
Park (2002) listed three specimens and no sight records
for Gyeonggi province, with five sight records and one
specimen from south-west South Korea, while Tomek
(1999) traced 1 1 records from spring (April-May) and
five from autumn (August-September), with only one
post- 1975 record in DPRK.
Rufous-bellied Woodpecker Dendmcopos hyperythrus
Five records, with singles on 17 May and 20 May 2004
(both photographed), a male between 16 and 19 May
2005, a female on 22 May 2005, and one on 1 4 September
2005 (the last by M. Brazil, per F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed three specimens, all collected in
Gyeonggi province (in October 1919, 10 May 1961 and
undated in 1968), and no sight records for South Korea,
while Tomek (1999) traced only three records for DPRK
(in May, May-June and in September), the last in 1933.
House Swift Apus affinis
Five records involving seven birds, with one on 30 May
2003; one on 2 October 2003; two on 29 April 2004;
three on 5 September 2004 and one on 3 1 October 2004.
104
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Park (2002) listed no records for Gyeonggi, one
specimen from Jeju (1989) and six sight records (13
individuals) in South Korea, first in 1 989, all in Jeollanam
and Jeju, while T omek (1999) traced no records in DPRK.
Barn Owl Tyto alba / Grass Owl T. capensis
A screeching call, believed to be made by a Tyto owl, was
heard at late dusk on 25 and 26 October 2003, while a very
pale Tyto sp. owl (either a Barn or Grass Owl) was then
seen in the same area in very poor evening light on 28
October, flying alongside and even landing on the road.
Although no species of Tyto had been listed at that time for
the Korean peninsula, a Grass Owl was found dead on
Daeheuksan Island, Jeollanam province, South Korea on
25 December 2003 (Park Jong-Gil in litt. 2003, Moores
and Moores 2003), with the specimen now held on Hong
Island by the National Parks Association (pers. obs).
Neither Grass nor Barn Owl is listed in Tomek (1999),
Lee et al. (2000) or Park (2002).
Little Owl Athene noctua
Three records, all in autumn 2004: one on 4 September
(Park Jin- Young in litt. 2004), one on 22 September and
one on 13 October. Considering the conspicuous
behaviour of the individuals on 4 September and 13
October (when they were photographed) , the gap in dates
between observations (despite high observer activity),
and the presence of a further Little Owl seen on
Baekryeong Island (c.20 km to the north) by Park Jin-
Y oung {in litt. 2004) on 6 September 2004, it seems likely
that three different individuals were involved. It is perhaps
notable that the species was not recorded in either 2003
or 2005.
Park (2002) listed six specimens (and no sight records)
from South Korea, five of which were from Gyeonggi
province, in the months of February, March, April,
September, October and December. These have been
followed by several subsequent records in winter in
northern and western provinces (e.g. Moores and Moores
2005). Tomek (1999) traced 12 DPRK records with the
most recent in 1962, while Duckworth (2006) listed a
further six individuals at least.
Long-eared Owl Asio otus
Three records involving four individuals: two on 29
October 2003, one on 1 1 November 2004, and one found
recently dead on 18 October 2005 (T. Edelsten and R.
Newlin in litt. 2005). In addition, one or more probably
two were seen over the sea between Socheong Island and
Incheon Port on 31 October 2004.
Park (2002) listed nine specimens from Gyeonggi and
nine from other provinces in South Korea, only three
sight records (of four individuals), and described roosts
(which now no longer exist) formerly of 20-30 in pines in
autumn and winter. Tomek (1999) traced about a dozen
DPRK records, the latest acceptable one from 1958, while
Duckworth (2006) clarified the status oftwo earlier reports
and added one more record.
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus
One record on 14 December 2003.
Park (2002) listed 1 1 specimens and five sight records
from Gyeonggi province, with three further specimens
and multiple sight records from five other provinces, all
but one from between mid-November and early April.
Duckworth (2006) reviewed its status in DPRK and
concluded it is probably now scarce there.
Japanese Wood Pigeon Columba janthina
Near Threatened. One was heard giving repeated and
diagnostic calls on 1 October 2005 by an observer very
experienced with the species; although searched for
intensively it could not be seen (F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed no records for Gyeonggi province,
although the species breeds very locally in three or four
other provinces in South Korea. A provisional record
from Wonsan in Stepanyan (1998) from 18 November
1989 is the only indication of occurrence in DPRK.
Red COLLARED Dove Streptopelia tranquebarica
Three records, all in spring 2005, when female-type
individuals were photographed in different parts of the
island on 20 May, 22-23 May and 3-4 June.
Tomek (1999) traced four records for DRPK (first in
1 928), while Park (2002) listed one specimen (Jeju, 1 993),
and three sight records for South Korea, all from western
provinces, in May-June 2001.
White-bellied Green Pigeon Treron sieboldii
A male on 18 May 2005 was very poorly photographed,
with the same (or another) found by Kenji Mochizuki on
22 May, and again seen by NM.
Park (2002) listed four specimens (first collected in
1977) and two sight records for South Korea (four on
Tok-Do in the East Sea in October 1992, and one in
Gyeongsangnam province in May 1 998) . It was not listed
by Tomek (1999) for DPRK.
White-breasted W aterhen Amauromis plioenicums
Five records of singles, all in different parts of the island:
on 14 and 16 May 2004, and 18, 21 and 22 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed a number of records from six
provinces of South Korea (first in 1970, but most from
more recent years), including three specimens and three
sight records from Gyeonggi province. He also described
a failed breeding attempt in Jeollabuk province in summer
200 1 . T omek ( 1 999) traced only a single record for DPRK,
on 19 May 1984.
Band-bellied Crake Porzana paykullii
Near Threatened. An immature was seen clearly, although
briefly, for a total of c.5 seconds, on 21 September 2004.
After a heavy rainstorm in the early hours, it was flushed
twice at close range from tangled grasses above the main
village in the early morning. The bird was large (almost
the size of Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus, and
muchbulkier-looking than Ruddy-breasted Crake P.fusca,
a species with which NM is very familiar), with dark brown
upperparts, and pale buffish-chestnut underparts, a paler
throat and belly and a pale huffish wash ventrally. The
flanks were prominently but finely barred black and white,
and in flight it showed faint pale barring or spotting on
the upperwing-coverts. The bill was dull brownish and
the legs dull greenish-brown. A deep ock call given once
from the same spot as the bird flushed from was
presumably given by this bird.
Park (2002) listed six specimens for South Korea, the
last in 1962, five of which were collected in Gyeonggi
province. There is one additional recent record in South
Korea: one collected in the Seoul/Gyeonggi area in 1995
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
105
(Park Jong-Gil in litt. 2004). Tomek (1999) traced about
12 records for DPRK, the last in 1960.
Latham’s Snipe Gallinago hardwickii
Although about a quarter to a third of snipes seen were
left unidentified, there were four records, involving
probably six individuals, all in 2004, identified as Latham’s
Snipe: singles on 15, 16 and 26 April; three on 28 April;
and another single on 29 April. They were identified by
a combination of size and structure (large, long-billed,
long-tailed with angular wing-tips and a rapid flight) and
plumage details (pale, sandy-toned with largely very pale
median upperwing-coverts, no obvious white on the
secondaries, and a contrasting head pattern), with birds
also drumming briefly on 28 and 29 April. The lack of
records in 2003 or 2005 reflects the lack of coverage
between mid- and late April in those years. This species
is a regular migrant in South Korea, with records annually,
especially on offshore islands in the second half of April
(e.g. Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005), and this
peak of migration accords well with migrants arriving in
Hokkaido and neighbouring offshore islands in Japan
during 13-24 April (Brazil 1991).
Tomek (1999) traced no data from DPRK, while Park
(2002) detailed one specimen, and only five sight records
for South Korea, none from Gyeonggi province.
Pintail Snipe Gallinago stenura
Recorded on 22 dates, twice in spring (with singles on 28
April and 17 May, both in 2004), and the remainder in
autumn, on dates between 19 August and 4 October.
Most records were of single birds, with the highest counts
being five on each of 1 9 August and 4 September, both
in 2004. Pintail Snipes were identified by a combination
of call, small size and structure (proportionately short¬
billed, often with toes extending prominently behind the
sometimes wedge-shaped-looking tail in flight).
Park (2002) traced sight records in spring and autumn
from four provinces, including Gyeonggi, and 27
specimens from there, with the majority (at least 17)
collected between late August and mid-September.
Tomek (1999) listed ten records, with six in May and
four between August and mid-September, with the most
recent in 1969.
SWINHOE’S SNIPE Gallinago megala
Six single Swinhoe’s Snipes, on 30 May 2003, 31 May
2004, 4 September 2003, 5 September 2003, 1 7 September
2005 (photographed, F. Crystal in litt. 2005) and 17
October 2003, were identified through a combination of
size (large), structure (rather long-billed, with rounded-
looking primaries) , plumage tones (grey-washed and dark)
and flight pattern (comparatively slow) and on at least one
occasion on call (deep, lacking the wetness or the rasping
tones of other east Asian snipe species).
Tomek (1999) traced only three records for DPRK.
Park (2002) listed 1 8 specimens from Gyeonggi province,
most from September, and five sight records from
Gyeonggi and Jeollanam provinces.
Little Curlew Numenius minutus
One, during 27-29 April 2004, and a flock of four or
more heard pre-dawn on 19 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed three specimens and no sight records
from Gyeonggi province, with four sight records
nationwide, including a flock of 21 on 29 April 1993 on
Jeju. Tomek (1999) traced seven records on the west
coast (end April-May) and only one record on the east
coast of DPRK.
Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis
One (photographed) on the beach on 18 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed ten specimens from Gyeonggi
province alone, and sight records from seven provinces in
South Korea including in Gyeonggi, with a national high
count of 230 on 29 August 1999 at the Dongjin estuary,
Saemangeum (with a further count of 200 there in
September 2005: Moores and Moores 2005). However,
Tomek (1999) traced only two records for DPRK (one in
August 1917, the second in September 1930).
Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis
One on 2 October 2003 (D. Parmenter in litt. 2003).
Park (2002) detailed one specimen (from 1887) but
no sight records from Gyeonggi province, along with sight
records and information on recent breeding further south
in South Korea, while Tomek (1999) traced no data for
DPRK.
Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus
One was photographed on the main beach on 17 May
2004.
Park (2002) detailed five specimens and one sight
record from Gyeonggi province, as well as one specimen
and a total of nine sight records from five other provinces .
Tomek (1999) accepted one record (1 6 September 1989),
and Duckworth (2006) recorded the species only once.
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
Three records, with singles on 27 April 2004, 20 May
2004 and 18 May 2005.
Park (2002) traced four sight records (eight
individuals) from Gyeonggi province (and specimens from
one province and sight records from five other provinces
in South Korea), while Tomek (1999) traced only one
previous DPRK record, with Duckworth (2006) adding
one more, of three on 30 April 2002.
South Polar Skua Catharacta maccormicki
Observed only once from Socheong Island itself (one on
24 October 2003). The species, however, appears to be
regular in autumn at sea between Socheong and Incheon
Port, with 12 further records (most by NM and other
observers experienced with this species) involving 15
individuals (including both paler and darker individuals),
between 9 September and 3 November. Identification
was based on size, structure and plumage (often in direct
comparison with Pomarine Jaeger Stercorarius pomarinus) ,
although the possibility of confusion of some dark
individuals with the unrecorded Brown Skua C. antarctica ,
listed for the Oriental region by Inskipp et al. (1996),
might exist.
Not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002), Tomek
(1999) or Duckworth (2006), although recorded several
times in South Korea since the first in 1995 (e.g. Moores
and Moores 2005).
Pomarine Jaeger Stercorarius pomarinus
Recorded from Socheong Island itself on only four
occasions (one on 1 October 2004; eight on 2 October
106
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
2003; 25 on 12 October 2003; and five on 18 October
2004). The species is regular in autumn at sea between
Incheon Port and Socheong Island, with one spring record
(one on 26 May 2003), and records on 23 dates in autumn
between 23 August and 5 November involving 354
individuals. The highest counts are from early October to
early November, with 36 on 13 October 2003, 49 on 4
October 2004, 45 on 1 9 October 2004, 82 on 3 1 October
2004, 51 on 3 November 2004 and 40 on 5 November
2004.
Not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002) or Tomek
( 1 999), although occasionally numerous on migration in
South Korean waters (e.g. Moores and Moores 2002,
2003, 2004a, 2005).
Parasitic Jaeger Stercorarius parasiticus
Recorded three times from Socheong Island itself, with
singles on 25 September and 2 October 2003, and two on
1 2 October 2003. Recorded rather more frequently at sea
between Socheong Island and Incheon Port, with one
spring record (one on 29 April 2004) and eight records
involving 29 individuals in autumn, between 23 September
and 3 1 October.
Not listed by Tomek (1999) for DPRK, while Park
(2002) detailed one sight record of four on 1 5 September
1987 in the East Sea 3 km off Pohang as the only South
Korean record. It is now considered to occur regularly in
South Korean waters (Moores and Moores 2002, 2003,
2004a, 2005).
Slaty-backed Gull Lams schistisagus
Recorded seven times (nine individuals) on Socheong
Island itself, between 21 October and 25 March, with at
least three further autumn records (four individuals) from
the ferry between Socheong and Incheon Port.
Park (2002) listed multiple records, including of large
flocks, from four provinces but none from Gyeonggi, while
Tomek (1999) traced DPRK records from only four sites
(but one was seriously doubted by Duckworth 2006),
and Stepanyan (1998) and Duckworth (2006) each
recorded it from one further site.
Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla
On Socheong Island itself, one on 25 September 2003,
and then recorded especially from mid-October to mid-
November, occasionally in large rafts entirely made up of
adults (based on plumage features, all evidently of the
Pacific subspecies R. t. pollicaris ). Highest counts from
the island include 500 on 24 October 2003, 2,200 on 15
October 2004, and >500 on 12 November 2004. The
species can be even more numerous at sea in October and
November, with high counts from the ferry between
Incheon Port and Socheong Island in 2004 including
3,800 on 31 October 2004, 5,900 on 3 November, and
1,300 on 13 November. Again, almost all individuals
(>99%) were adults, with most birds seen from the ferry
moving west or south-west. The species is much scarcer
in December and March (none was seen from Socheong
in those months; only eight were seen from the ferry on
16 December 2003, and only one from the ferry on 22
March 2004, with none on 26 March 2004).
Park (2002) listed only one record for coastal Gyeonggi
province (50 on 30 December 1 999), and highest counts
on the east coast of South Korea of 1 ,000 in December
1989 in Gangwon province and 561 on 14 November
2001 along the coast between Ulsan and Pohang
(Gyeongsangnam) . T omek (1999) traced only five records
in DPRK, all on the east coast, and all between late
September and February (a quoted date of 1 8 September
1989 was an error for 18 October 1989: Fiebig 1993),
while Duckworth (2006) recorded it twice in DPRK,
both times inland (in October 2002 and November 2004).
These observations combined consolidate the suggestion
(by NM in Robson 2004: 102) that many Black-legged
Kittiwakes cross the Korean peninsula overland in October
and November (with many also moving south down the
east coast at that time).
ANCIENT Murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus
Recorded only five times from Socheong Island itself, with
one on 13 April 2004, 85 on 14 May 2004, three on 16
May 2005, and 20-25 on 2 November 2004. It is possibly
present throughout much of the year, as observations from
the ferry within 5 km of Socheong include records in April,
May and June (three on 3 June 2004), and again in October,
November and December. The highest count between
Incheon Port and Socheong was 292 on 13 November
2004, when >200 were within sight of the island.
Tomek (1999) traced about ten records for DPRK,
with most from the east coast. She cited a single record
from Hwanghae province, on 5 March 1922 (Austin
1948), which she suggested was evidence of nesting.
However, the species is often found in non-breeding areas
in Japan until early May (Brazil 1991). Park (2002)
included no specimens and only one sight record from
Gyeonggi province, a count of 3,000 on 12 December
1 999, while providing details of even higher winter counts
from the east coast, with a single day count in
Gyeongsangbuk province of 1 6,000 (on 20 January 2001),
as well as information on localised breeding in the southern
part of the Yellow Sea.
RHINOCEROS Auklet Cerorhinca monocerata
Between three and eight individuals were seen from
Socheong Island on 15 December 2003, in addition to
three or more seen from the ferry near the island on 13
December 2003.
T omek (1999) found more than ten records on eastern
and western coasts of DPRK, with all observations
between April and June, most recently in 1967. Park
(2002) listed specimens from three, and observations from
four, provinces in South Korea, but none from Gyeonggi
province.
Oriental Honey-buzzard Pemis ptilorhyncus
This is one of the most numerous raptors recorded on
Socheong Island, especially in autumn. There are records
on eight dates in spring between 28 April and 3 June, and
on c.50 dates in autumn between 5 September and 29
October. The highest count in spring was eight on 28
May 2003, while counts of over 100 have been made on
at least six dates in autumn, twice by NM (130 on 23
September 2003, 120 on 25 September 2003) and four
times by F. Crystal in 2005 (188 on 22 September, 149
on 24 September, 207 on 25 September, 171 on 26
September, and 239 on 27 September). In 2005, a total
of 1,240 were estimated to have passed west between 22
September and 4 October (F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed sight records front a total of five
provinces in South Korea, with four specimens (including
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
107
one presumably erroneous record from 20 February 1 930,
from Austin 1948), and seven sight records (of c.85
individuals) from Gyeonggi province, between 30 April
and 17 May and again from 15 September to 5 October.
Tornek (1999) traced only five DPRK records and
overlooked one in Fiebig (1993), with Duckworth (2006)
adding several more, all of small numbers.
White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla
Near Threatened. Two records: singles on 1 6 December
2003 and 29 October 2005.
Park (2002) traced nine specimens and 1 5 sight records
(45 individuals) from Gyeonggi province alone, with
specimens and multiple sight records from six other
provinces (including breeding in the far south-west) , while
Tomek (1999) listed many records in winter on the west
and east coasts and included the observation from Fiebig
(1993) that the species is not rare in DPRK, occurring
regularly even in the Pyongyang city centre during 1 999-
2004 (J. W. Duckworth in litt. 2006).
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus
Near Threatened. One on Socheong and Daecheong
Islands (commuting between the islands) during at least
26-31 May 2003.
Park (2002) listed four specimens from Gyeonggi
province, and numerous sight records from there and five
other provinces. Tomek (1999) traced only one recent
DPRK record, and Stepanyan (1998) and Duckworth
(2006) each added one further recent sight record. Large
numbers winter over and near the de-militarised zone
running between South Korea and DPRK (Lee et al. 2004) .
Crested Serpent Eagle Spilomis cheela
One was seen well in flight in October 2002 (Kim Dong-
Won verbally 2004).
This species was not listed by Tomek (1999) for
DPRK. Park (2002) listed two specimens and one sight
record from Gyeongsangnam province in south-east South
Korea.
‘Eastern Marsh Harrier’ Circus ( aeruginosus ) spilonotus
An uncommon migrant, recorded only in autumn, on
nine dates between 20 September and 12 October. All
records were of singles, except two on 25 September 2003,
three on 2 October 2003, two on 10 October 2004 and
two on 20 September 2005 (the last by F. Crystal in litt.
2005). All individuals were identified as spilonotus based
on rump, upperwing-coverts and underwing pattern.
Park (2002) listed six specimens from Gyeonggi
province, and one sight record from there, along with
either specimens or sight records from six other provinces
(all implied to be spilonotus ), while Tomek (1999) traced
only four records and Duckworth (2006) discussed further
records in DPRK.
Pied Harrier Circus melanoleucos
Only one record in spring (2 June 2004), but recorded on
25 dates in autumn, between 3 September and 3 1 October,
with highest day counts by year of three on 12 October
2003, ten on 1 9 September 2004 and 1 6 on 20 September
2005 (last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005), and a total of 40
individuals logged during autumn 2005.
These Socheong records indicate a far more regular
autumn passage of the species through the area than the
few records in the South Korean literature suggest. Park
(2002) listed a total of seven specimens from Gyeonggi
province, with six of these from April and May, and only
one from mid-September, and only one sight record, on
the apparently slightly atypical date of 21 August 1984.
He listed only two other sight records in South Korea
(both from Seosan on the west coast), but added that it
had been reported breeding in Cheorwon, Gangwon
province. Tomek (1999) traced a dozen or so records,
and described it as a breeding species in DPRK, while
J. W. Duckworth (in litt. 2006) probably saw the species
once or more in DPRK during 1999-2004.
Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga
Vulnerable. Observed three times, all in October, with
three on 1 2 October 2004, one or two on 1 3 October 2004
and one on 23 October 2005. In addition, possibly up to
1 6, all juvenile types, all flying singly, were counted moving
west on one day in mid-October 2002 (Kim Dong-Won
verbally 2004). Considering the tendency for many large
raptors to circle the island before committing to a long
sea-crossing, especiallywhenvisibilityispoor, it is unclear
how many individuals were involved on that day.
Tomek (1999) traced no records for DPRK, while
Park (2002) listed seven specimens from Gyeonggi
province (all dated between 20 November and 16 March),
and sight records from two other provinces.
Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca
Vulnerable. Singles on 13 October 2003 and 18 October
2005 (the latter: Toshikazu Onishi, Yozo Koshiyama and
Atsushi Igari in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed one specimen and six sight records
all of singles from Gyeonggi province, as well as sight
records from six other provinces. Tomek (1999) traced
three DPRK records, between 9 December and 21
February, overlooking one reported in Neff (1956).
Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
Recorded on five dates in spring (between 27 April and
20 May) and on at least 16 dates in autumn, between 8
September and 24 October. The highest count in spring
was of four (on both 18 and 19 May 2005), while in
autumn at least 300 were counted in a single day, on 16
October 2005 (last by Toshikazu Onishi, Yozo Koshiyama
and Atsushi Igari in litt. 2005). This is a far higher count
than any previously published in South Korea, though it
followed very soon after 96 counted on 1 1 October 2005
at Imjingak, Gyeonggi province (NM unpublished data).
Park (2002) listed six specimens from Gyeonggi
province (one collected in mid-April, and five between
14 September and 20 October) and only four sight records,
all of single birds, as well as sight records from four other
provinces. Tomek (1999) described the species as ‘rarely
observed’ in DPRK, and J. W. Duckworth (in litt. 2006)
saw only small numbers a few times in DPRK during
1999-2004.
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus
Two on 29 October 2003.
Park (2002) listed sight records from three other
provinces in South Korea, and two specimens but no
sight records from Gyeonggi province, while Tomek
(1999) traced no records of the species on the west coast
of DPRK.
108
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo
One record: a first-year bird with Temminck’s Cormorant
P. capillatus on 25 October 2003. Identification was based
on the criteria outlined by Lethaby and Moores (1999).
Park (2002) traced specimens from five provinces
(including four from Gyeonggi), and sight records from
four provinces, with the highest count in Gyeonggi of six
(in July 2001), and nationwide of 1,558 at the Nakdong
Estuary, in December 1992. Tomek (1999) noted that it
was formerly very common in the DPRK ‘at the turn of
the century [c. 1 900] adding that ‘in the past fifty years
there have been hardly two reports’. She listed only one
record post- 1975, in April 1987.
Chinese Egret Egretta eulophotes
Vulnerable. Two records: a breeding-plumaged adult on
27 April 2004, and a juvenile-type on 1 9 September 2004.
Park (2002) traced two specimens from Gyeonggi
province, and numerous sight records (some of >100
individuals; see also BirdLife International 2001), while
Tomek (1999) stated that probably between 100 and
several hundred pairs nest in western DPRK. This region
of western Korea forms the core of the species’s global
breeding range (BirdLife International 2001).
Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia
Most regular in spring, when seen on ten dates, with
records between 26 April and 3 June, and a peak count of
three on 21-22 May 2005. There was only one record in
autumn: four on 2 October (F. Crystal in lilt. 2005).
Duckworth (2006) added several records to the two
traced by Tomek (1999) in DPRK (the latter rejected
many records as unproven, so perhaps underestimated
the frequency of occurrence in DPRK), while Park (2002)
listed seven specimens from Gyeonggi province and only
two sight records (although mentioning that breeding
had been recorded) as well as sight records or specimens
from four other provinces.
Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus
The species is a regular migrant (as on several other west
coast islands in South Korea: e.g. Anon. 2003), especially
in spring when it is often found in small groups of three
or four birds. It has been recorded on at least 19 dates
between 28 April and 3 June, with the highest count being
>10 on 21 May 2005. It has been recorded only once in
autumn: one on 2 October 2005 (F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed nine sight records from Gyeonggi
province, including one record of five birds present in
July 1998, and sight records from six other provinces.
Following the first records in South Korea in 1985,
breeding has recently been suspected in Cheorwon,
Gangwon province, and proven on Ganghwa, Gyeonggi
province (Moores and Moores 2004a, 2005). Tomek
(1999) traced only two records for DPRK, both in June.
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax
A regular migrant, recorded on eight dates between 27
April and 2 June and on 22 dates between 2 1 August and
29 October. The highest counts in spring were of four on
27 April and again on 17 May 2004, while in autumn
there were ten on 5 September 2003, and, seen by F.
Crystal (in litt. 2005), 25 on 2 October 2005.
Park (2002) discussed its recent colonisation of South
Korea, listing seven specimens from Gyeonggi province
(earliest from 1 960) and sight records including 74 on 30
September 1991 on Ganghwa, and 250 at Pyeongtaek on
2 April 2000, as well as many sight records from six other
provinces. Tomek (1999) listed only two records for
DPRK, from 1 925 and 1931, but the species has recently
also become much more frequent there (Duckworth
2006).
Japanese Night Heron Gorsachius goisagi
Endangered. One was photographed between 26 April
and 20 May 2004, the same period that the species was
recorded on at least three other South Korean islands
(Moores and Moores 2004a).
Park (2002) listed four specimens from
Gyeongsangnam province (the most recent in 200 1 ) and
five specimens from Jeju, as well as a total of five further
sight records from Jeollanam and Jeju. It was not listed by
Tomek (1999) for DPRK.
Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis
An adult male was watched flying in off the sea on 1 9 May
2005. It was photographed before it apparently entered
a covered concrete drain running under the village. The
same afternoon presumably the same individual was then
seen 500 m away, walking along a track in a dense belt of
conifers.
Park (2002) listed single specimens from Gangwon
province (June) and Jeju (May), as well as one sight record
from Jeollanam province (May) . It was not listed by T omek
(1999) for DPRK.
Black Stork Ciconia nigra
Two records: a single bird on 2 October 2003, and
three together, photographed, flying west, on 31 October
2004.
Park (2002) listed six specimens from five provinces
in South Korea and two sight records in Gyeonggi
(including one nest-building in June 1965), as well as
c.20 sight records from four other provinces. Tomek
(1999) considered it a breeding species for DPRK, but
much rarer now than a century ago.
Lesser Frigatebird Fregata ariel
An immature was photographed on 9 August 2004 (T.
Heinicke and J. Steudtner in litt. 2004).
Park (2002) listed two specimens from Gyeonggi
province (one in July 1961, one in January 1 967) and two
sight records, both of individuals (one in June, one in
July), as well as two sight records of singles from other
provinces, while Tomek (1999) traced one record for
DPRK.
Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata
Recorded from Socheong Island on 24 March 2004 (one)
and 25 March 2004 (two). In addition, the species was
seen at least three times from the ferry between Socheong
Island and Incheon Port, with one on 22 March 2004,
four on 26 April 2004, and three on 30 May 2004, the
latter individuals in breeding plumage.
Park (2002) listed one specimen and only two sight
records from Gyeonggi province (both from 1932), as
well as specimens or sight records from six other provinces
in South Korea. Tomek (1999) traced only five records
for DPRK, only one of which was in the last 50 years, with
Duckworth (2006) adding two more.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
109
Black-throated Loon Gavia arnica
Recorded from Socheong Island three times, with two on
1 4 December 2003, two on 1 3 April 2004, and one on 20
May 2005. It was also recorded at sea between Socheong
Island and Incheon Port twice, with one on 25 March
2004 and four on 16 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed no specimens or sight records for
Gyeonggi province, but sight records and/or specimens
from five other provinces in South Korea. Tomek (1999)
traced eight records for DPRK (although few if any
excluded Pacific Loon G. pacifica from identification),
while J. W. Duckworth {in litt. 2006) saw the species
regularly there during 1999-2004.
Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica
As well as unidentified loons sometimes seen offshore,
Pacific Loons were confidently identified twice from
Socheong Island itself: one on 18 May 2005 and two on
16 December 2003. In addition, breeding plumaged
Pacific Loons were seen from the ferry between Socheong
Island and Incheon Port four times between 26 April and
30 May (including 16 on 16 May 2005), while non¬
breeding plumaged birds were seen at least four times
between 30 October and 1 3 November, with a peak of
c.100 on 13 November 2004. Identification of non-
breeding-plumaged individuals was based on structure
(small, short-billed) and plumage details (particularly the
darker ‘face’ and obvious chin strap and ventral strap:
e.g. Moores 1996).
Park (2002) listed no specimens or sight records from
Gyeonggi province, with sight records and/or specimens
from four other provinces in South Korea. Tomek (1999)
did not refer to the species (records listed by her as G.
arctica were presumably not critically distinguished from
this species, which formerly was regarded as conspecific
with G. arctica ), although J. W. Duckworth {in litt. 2006)
probably saw the species once in DPRK, on 1 7 June 2003.
Yellow-billed Loon Gavia adamsii
From Socheong Island, at least five and probably eight
non-breeding plumaged birds were present at long range,
identifiable only in good light with a calm sea and a 60x
lens on 25 March 2004 (potentially at least some might
have been Common Loon G. immer, a species unrecorded
on the Korean peninsula). From the ferry between
Socheong Island and Incheon Port, one juvenile type was
seen close to Socheong on 16 December 2003, while
singles were seen 1 0-50 km out to sea on 26 March 2004,
12 April 2004 and 1 May 2004 (the latter by K. Steiof in
litt. 2004) : the last two records were apparently breeding-
plumaged adults.
The sea near Socheong is probably used regularly by
the species between at least December and May. Satellite
tracking of five Yellow-billed Loons breeding on the
Alaskan north slope in 2002 and six in 2003 showed that
all migrated south into coastal East Asia, with some
individuals migrating across the Korean peninsula to
winter in the Yellow Sea, e.g. off the Shandong Peninsula
and in sea areas near Socheong from the end of November-
December until at least March (J. Schmutz in litt. 2003,
2006, Earnst 2004), with Earnst (2004) suggesting that
Alaskan-breeding Yellow-billed Loons return to Alaska
in the last third of May. Park (2002) listed no sight records
for South Korea (apparently overlooking records from
March 1948 in Busan given by Fennell [1952]), and only
two specimens from South Korea, both from Gangwon
province in the north-east. The first of these was from
Soondalmyeon in 1914 (which Duckworth [2006] later
traced to being within DPRK and not South Korea, while
adding one further record of the species for DPRK), with
the second record inland, from Chuncheon on 28 April
1975.
Streaked Shearwater Calonectris leucomelas
This shearwater was present and occasionally numerous
off Socheong between late March and early November,
and evidently (based on anecdotal evidence and observed
behaviour) nests either on Socheong, or, more likely, on
neighbouring islands. The earliest spring record was of
96 on 23 March 2004; the latest autumn record was one
on 1 November 2004, with 14 seen from the ferry on 5
November 2004. Highest counts by year include 1,000
on 25 September 2003, 1,300 on 14 May 2004 and 600
on 29 September 2005 (last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005),
with birds frequently gathering in a dense raft off the
western end of the island at dusk.
Park (2002) traced both specimens and sight records
from five provinces, including one collected on 12
November 1968 in Gyeonggi. Although only one sight
record is listed for Gyeonggi, counts in other provinces
include a maximum of 5,000 in Jeju in September 1 992.
While tracing only seven records, none post- 1975, Tomek
( 1 999) described it as a ‘rare breeding’ species on islands
situated along the west and east coasts of DPRK, ‘probably
more frequent than might be judged from the number of
observations’.
Flesh-footed Shearwater Puffinus cameipes
From Socheong Island itself, this species was noted four
times in autumn, with two on 25 September 2003, and
singles on 2 October 2003, 14 September 2004 and 18
October 2004. It was slightly more regular at sea between
Socheong Island and Incheon Port, with 12 further
observations, all between 20 September and 30 October,
involving 21 individuals (with a maximum count of four
on 23 September 2004).
Duckworth (2004) reviewed the status of the species
in DPRK, tracing ten ringing recoveries, while Park (2002)
listed six specimens from two east coast provinces (in
1963 and 1965), and one sight record (two, on 30 August
1996 offshore from Gyeonsangnam province), apparently
overlooking information in Fennell (1966) that stated
‘according to above reports, at least nine Flesh-footed
Shearwaters have been recorded in Korean coastal waters’,
and Purchase (1971) that indicated c.34 recoveries of
birds banded on Lord Howe Island had so far been
observed in Korean waters (both DPRK and South Korea)
off the east coast, including two recovered off Sokcho in
June 1969-1970(?). Indeed, Purchase (1971) even came
to the conclusion that the Korean East Sea/Sea of Japan
is the ‘main [austral] wintering area’ for Flesh-footed
Shearwater breeding on Lord Howe Island.
Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris
Noted four times from Socheong Island itself, with two
on 18 August 2004, three on 1 October 2003, three or
more on 2 October 2003, and one on 18 October 2004.
In addition one was seen from the ferry just offshore from
Socheong on 3 June 2004. In open sea between Socheong
Island and Incheon Port, two were seen from the ferry on
110
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
1 8 August 2004 and 23 August 2004, with further singles
on 23 September 2003 and 3 October 2003.
Duckworth (2004) concluded that the sole DPRK
record in Tomek (1999) was in error for Flesh-footed
Shearwater, while Park (2002) listed seven specimens
from three east coast provinces in South Korea and no
sight records.
Fairy Pitta Pitta nympha
Vulnerable. One on 17 September 2004.
Park (2002) listed four specimens (all from July) and
no sight records from Gyeonggi province, with 26 further
specimens from three other provinces in South Korea,
and sight records also from the southern provinces of
Gyeonsangnam, Jeollanam and Jeju. Tomek (2002) traced
five records from DPRK, the last in 1963.
‘STEPPE’ Grey Shrike Lanins ( meridionalis ) pallidirostris
One photographed at close range on 22 September 2004
was identified as this taxon. After discussion on images of
the bird posted on the Birds Korea website and a prolonged
review of literature, including Conzemius (2001),
separation from Chinese Grey Shrike L. sphenocercus, and
identification as L. ( m .) pallidirostris was based on a
combination of features including its smaller size, apparent
lack of extensive white wing-stripe, paler rump and
uppertail-coverts, tail pattern and shape (lacking obviously
longer central tail feathers) and its brownish toes.
Separation from Great Grey Shrike L. excubitor, most
especially of subspecies bianchi (collected four times and
observed once in South Korea, between November and
March: Park 2002) was based on e.g. the complete lack
of vermiculations on the underparts, its buffish wash on
the underparts and, again, the brownish toes (e.g. Moores
and Moores 2004b).
Lanins meridionalis, only recently considered by
some authorities as specifically distinct from L. excubitor,
is not listed by Lee et al. (2000) or Park (2002), while
Tomek (2002) does not provide sufficient plumage
details of the four specimens of L. excubitor sensu lato
(collected in months of November-February) in DPRK
to either rule out or suggest identification as pallidirostris.
As such, this is presumably the first record for the Korean
peninsula.
Black-winged Cuckooshrike Coracina melaschistos
Three singles, on 21 May 2005 (Kenji Mochizuki in litt.
2005); a probable, on 18 September (M. Brazil in litt.
2005); and, well-observed and -described, on 2 October
2005 (F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
It was not included in Tomek (2002) for DPRK, and
Park (2002) listed only one previous record for South
Korea, a sight record in Jeollanam province in August
1998.
BLACK Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus
This species appears to be a regular spring migrant (as on
other outlying western islands in South Korea: e.g. Anon.
2003, Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005), recorded
in 2003, 2004 and 2005, with a total of probably c.30
individuals on 1 7 dates between 3 May and 4 June, with
11 on 22 May 2005 the highest count.
Park (2002) listed one specimen and one sight record
from Gyeonggi province (a single bird said to have been
collected on the extraordinarily early date of 30 March
1 993 on Baekryeong Island, and one seen on 2 June 2001),
and eight sight records, all since 1 988, from the west and
south-west of the country. Tomek (2002) traced one
record, in mid-May, from DPRK.
ASHY Drongo Dicrurus leucophaeus
One (grey with whitish ear-coverts) was recorded on 25
and 26 September 2003.
Park (2002) listed two sight records from South Korea
(both in Jeollanam province), although it has recently
been recorded scarcely in South Korea each year in spring
(Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005), while Tomek
(2002) traced three records from DPRK.
SPANGLED Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus
One on 21 May 2005.
One collected in November 1 959 in Gyeongsangnam
province is the only record in Park (2002), though it has
recently been recorded annually in South Korea in spring
(e.g. Anon. 2003, Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a,
2005); Tomek (2002) traced no records for DPRK.
Asian Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi
A female-type seen well but briefly (for c. 1 0 seconds) on
30 May 2003. Separation from Japanese Paradise-
flycatcher T. atrocaudata was based on the distinctly glossy
crown, slightly less striking eye-ring, and grey rather than
sooty-grey wash on the breast, which appeared much less
contrasting and clear-cut.
Park (2002) listed two specimens for South Korea:
one in Gyeonggi province on 1 July 1917 (cited from
Austin 1 948), and one from near Busan on 1 1 September
1954, but overlooked or ignored the records of two
males on ‘Kamak San’ near the Imjin river, on 23 May
1954 (Macfarlane 1963). Tomek (2002) traced records
only from one province in DPRK, all between 1917 and
1950.
Japanese Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone
atrocaudata
Near Threatened. One or two records, with a first-year
male in song watched well on 30 May 2003, and two or
three heard giving a very distinctive huoy-huoy-huoy song
phrase (referring to either this species or perhaps Asian
Paradise-flycatcher) on 2 June 2004.
Park (2002) listed 1 1 specimens and one sight record
from Gyeonggi province with 36 further specimens from
four and sight records from five further provinces
respectively, including breeding, while Tomek (2002)
described it as a breeding species in DPRK (tracing about
20 records of the species).
Japanese Waxwing Bombycilla japonica
Near Threatened. Two on 14 May 2004.
Park (2002) listed four specimens from Gyeonggi
province and 17 from four further provinces, with sight
records from four other provinces between 2 1 December
and 1 1 May. Although he listed none from Gyeonggi,
flocks have been seen in Seoul on several occasions (NM,
unpublished data). Tomek (2002) categorised the species
as a ‘very rare winter visitor and passage migrant’ to DPRK,
tracing only five dated records (from two sites), while
Duckworth (2006) added observations from several sites
in Pyongyang, with birds recorded between 1 8 November
and 1 9 May.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
Blue Rock Thrush Monticola solitarius
While the subspecies M. s. philippensis occurs regularly,
there is only one record of M. s. pandoo : one on 2 May
2005 (K. Mochizuki in lit:. 2005).
This is the second record of this subspecies for South
Korea, after one photographed on Eocheong Island on
23 April 2005 (Moores and Moores 2005).
Japanese Thrush Turdus cardis
Recorded on seven dates, four in spring (five individuals
between 27 April and 21 May) and three consecutive
dates in autumn 2004, when all records concerned a
significant arrival of thrushes following a severe
thunderstorm and strong south-easterly winds. There
were at least 1 7 on 11, five on 1 2 and at least seven on 1 3
November 2004.
Park (2002) listed six specimens and also sight records
from three southern provinces, with only one sight record
from Gyeonggi province (two in May 1985 in Incheon),
while Tomek (2002) accepted only one record from
DPRK.
Eurasian Blackbird Turdus merula
Recorded on at least ten dates, between 22 March and 22
May, with singles on most dates, but two on 22 March
2004, four on 21 May 2005 (including a singing male),
and two on 22 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed eight sight records from three
provinces in South Korea, including one sight record
from Gyeonggi province (one in March 2000), all since
the first record of a small breeding colony found in 1 999.
Duckworth (2004) showed that it had also been occurring
with some regularity in small numbers in Pyongyang since
the first observations in 2000, with one record elsewhere
in DPRK. All birds showed morphological and vocal
characters of the east Asian form T. ( m .) mandarinus , the
only one likely to occur on geographical grounds.
Brown-headed Thrush Turdus chrysolaus
Recorded only on three (consecutive) dates, with three
on 27 April, one on 28 April and two on 29 April 2004.
Park (2002) listed specimens and sight records from
the three southern provinces (Jeollanam, Gyeonsangnam
and Jeju, but none from Gyeonggi), while Duckworth
(2006) reviewed its status in DPRK, tracing fewer than
ten records.
Dark-throated Thrush Turdus ruficollis
Recorded on at least 15 dates (perhaps 17 individuals),
with two records in spring (24 March 2004 and 12 April
2004) , and the remainder in autumn (between 1 2 October
and 1 1 November). Both subspecies were recorded, with
three records of T. r. atrogularis (singles on 24 March
2004, 26 October 2004 and 22 October 2005), at least six
nominate T. r. ruficollis (singles on 26 October 2003, 29
October 2003, 9 November 2004, and two on 20 October
2005) , and another eight individuals not identified to
subspecies.
Duckworth (2004) detailed the first record for DPRK
(in Pyongyang on 1 1 April 2003), while Park (2002) listed
two sight records (seven individuals) for South Korea,
both from Jeollanam province, with five on 23 September
1989 (the largest single count and almost a month earlier
than any other Korean record of this species known to
NM), and two on 15 October 2001.
1 1 1
Chinese Thrush Turdus mupinensis
Two records: one on 31 May 2003 (well-watched and
photographed), and one on 1 8 May 2005, the latter flushed
from tangled grasses almost underfoot and flew over 100
m into taller cover. The individuals’ bulky structure and
their plumage features (including the face pattern, hint of
wing-bars and obviously spotted underparts) were
considered adequate to rule out any possible confusion
species and confirm identification.
The species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002) or Tomek (2002). These records constitute the
first and second records for the Korean peninsula.
Narcissus Flycatcher Ficedula narcissina
Recorded on five dates in spring, with singles on 30 May
2003 and 27 April 2005, and multiple counts coming
from three consecutive days in 2004, with five on 2 May,
12 (all males) on 3 May, and five on 4 May 2004 (K.
Steiof in litt. 2004).
Park (2002) listed specimens and sight records from the
three southern provinces of Jeollanam, Gyeongsangnam
and Jeju, and one sight record from Gyeonggi province (a
single on Baekryeong Island on 3 May 1995), while
Duckworth (2006) traced six records for DPRK.
Red-breasted Flycatcher Ficedula parua
Following Svensson et al. (2005), this is best considered
a monotypic species distinct from Red-throated or Taiga
Flycatcher F. albicilla. Although F. albicilla is a regular
migrant, 3-4 first-winter F. parva have also been recorded.
Two calling birds were found and photographed within
500 m of each other on 6 November 2004 (with one or
both remaining until 8 November); one calling presumed
F. parva was photographed on 1 1 November 2004; and
one was heard and seen briefly on 28 October 2005.
Identification of all individuals was based on a combination
of features, as outlined in Svensson et al. (2005). These
included: the colour of the longest uppertail coverts being
paler than the tail; the bill showing an obvious paler base
(in all but the individual on 1 1 November 2004, suggesting
either atypical bare part coloration or even the possibility
of it being a hybrid F. parva x F. albicilla ); the warmth of
the ‘face’ colour; and the rattle-call, which sounds much
softer in F. parva than F. albicilla.
No records of F. parva sensu stncto are explicitly listed
by either Park (2002) or Tomek (2002). However, it is
certain that many past records of this species-pair would
not have been critically identified, and, hence, their relative
proportion is unclear under the name of F. parva sensu
lato. There is only one previous record of F. parva sensu
stricto in South Korea: one on Eocheong Island on
30 April 2003 (NM, unpublished data documented with
photographs on the internet).
Verditer Flycatcher Eumyias thalassina
One (found by D. Buss and NM) on 2 November 2003.
This species was not listed for DPRK by Tomek
(2002), while Park (2002) listed one record for South
Korea (one photographed on Gageo Island in mid-
October 2001).
Japanese Robin Erithacus akahige
A male was present between at least 1 1 and 1 3 November
2004, following a severe thunderstorm and strong south¬
easterly winds overnight on 10-1 1 November.
1 12
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Park (2002) listed five specimens from
Gyeongsangnam province in the south-east of the
peninsula, and three sights records (six individuals) from
Jeju and Jeollanam provinces, all records between 31
March and 27 April. Duckworth (2006) collated the three
records from DPRK.
Siberian Rubythroat Luscinia calliope
An occasionally numerous migrant. Recorded on at least
19 dates in spring between 14 April and 2 June, and on
37 dates in autumn, with the earliest on 21 August, and
the remainder between 20 September and 1 2 November.
Peak numbers have been recorded in the second half of
May (with e.g. 1 5 on 20 May 2005) and again in the first
half of October (with high counts of >10 on 3 October
2003, >20 on 7 October 2004, and 43 on 4 October 2005;
the last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed 13 specimens from Gyeonggi
province (between 20 and 29 April in spring, and 24
September and 15 October in autumn) and numerous
sight records nationwide, including singing males
occupying territories on Sorak Mountain, Gangwon
province, in summer 200 1 . Duckworth (2006) reviewed
records in the DPRK, describing it as a ‘common breeder’
at his only study site with appropriate habitat (the
Myohyang mountains), and a locally common passage
migrant.
BLUETHROAT Luscinia svecica
Recorded at least three times in autumn, with singles on
7 October 2004, 2 November 2004 and 23 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed eight specimens and no sight records
from Gyeonggi province, with sight records from four
other provinces, while Duckworth (2006) referred to two
known records from DPRK.
Grey BUSHCHAT Saxicola ferrea
An adult male was present (and photographed) between
20 May and at least 22 May 2005.
No records were traced for DPRK by Tomek (2002),
and only one record for South Korea was listed in Park
(2002), on Daecheong Island, Incheon/Gyeonggi, on 5
May 1987. Moores and Moores (2004a) reported one
further record in South Korea, on Eocheong Island in
April 2004.
ISABELLINE WHEATEAR Oenanthe isabellina
One was photographed by M. Brazil and others on 5 May
2005 (K. Mochizuki in litt. 2005).
This species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002), or Tomek (2002), being first recorded on the
Korean peninsula on 1 May 2003 by Park Jong-Gil (Anon.
2003, Moores and Moores 2003), with a second South
Korean record in April 2005 (Moores and Moores 2005).
Red-billed Starling Stumus sericeus
Probably six individuals were recorded on five dates in
spring 2004, with singles on 24 March, 12 April and 15
April, three or four on 16 April, and one on 27 April.
The lack of records in 2003 and 2005 is probably at
least in part due to the lack of coverage in late March and
April in those years, as the species is now considered a
scarce but regular migrant to South Korea, most especially
in April (e.g. Anon. 2003, Moores and Moores 2005).
Park (2002) listed seven sight records (nine birds) in three
provinces, with the first record in South Korea (in
Gyeonggi province) on 16 April 2000, while Duckworth
(2004) described the first record for DPRK (in August
2001).
Chestnut-cheeked Starling Stumus philippensis
Two were present on 21 August 2004, and F. Crystal ( in
litt. 2005) reported a group of 1 5 in flight, believed to be
of this species, on 4 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed three specimens and three sight
records (five individuals) from Gyeonggi province,
including two in Seoul in June 1989 and in mid-July 1997,
as well as sight records from five other provinces, while
Duckworth (2006) listed the two dated records from
DPRK.
Chinese Penduline Tit Remiz consobrinus
Four on 22 October 2005 and 1 on 23 October 2005 are
the only records; Socheong Island has very little habitat
suitable for the species.
Park (2002) listed five specimens and four sight records
(34 individuals) from Gyeonggi province as well as sight
records from four other provinces, while Duckworth
(2006) traced 12 records for DPRK.
Yellow-bellied Tit Pams venustulus
One first-winter male was photographed on 22 October
2005.
The species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002) or Tomek (2002), and this constitutes the first
record for the Korean peninsula. Following this record,
one was seen on 1 3 November 2005 in Gunsan
(J. Maclennan and P. Nebel in litt. 2005), and one was
well-photographed on the mainland in Incheon (between
22 January and at least 23 February 2006: R. Newlin,
T. Edelsten, NM unpublished data).
Sand Martin Riparia riparia
A regular migrant, often occurring during movements of
other hirundines. Recorded on eight dates in spring,
between 14 and 29 May, and on 12 dates in autumn,
between 19 August and 21 October. The highest counts
by year were two on 29 May 2003, eight on 1 4 September
2004, and 40 on 18 May 2005.
Park (2002) listed 14 specimens from Gyeonggi
province and seven sight records, including a peak count
of 1 50 on 12 September 1 970 in Shiheung city, as well as
sight records from four other provinces. Tomek (2002)
traced only four records in DPRK, with Duckworth (2006)
adding one further record.
Northern House Martin Delichon urbica
Five records, with two on 27 May 2003, and singles on
3 and 24 September 2003, 14 September 2004, and
16 October 2005 (the last by T. Onishi, Y. Koshiyama
and A. Igari in litt. 2005). All were considered to be of the
subspecies D. u. lagopoda, based on range, and in particular
on the very extensive white on the upperparts (including
the rump, the lower back and the longest uppertail-coverts) .
It was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002) or
Tomek (2002), with the first record for the Korean
peninsula on Eocheong Island, when one was
photographed on 1 9 April and two on 20 April 2003 (NM
unpublished data, documented with photographs on the
internet).
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
113
Asian House Martin Delichon dasypus
A sometimes numerous migrant especially in autumn,
recorded on at least 1 1 dates in spring, and at least 35
dates in autumn. It was noted in spring between 1 2 April
and 30 May, and in autumn from 3 September to 8
November, with most records and the largest numbers in
September and the first half of October. Selected high
counts include 25 on 29 May 2003, 45 on 3 September
2004, 1 00 on 9 October 2004, and 3,000 on 2 1 September
2005 (the last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Counts on Socheong far exceed those in Park (2002),
who listed only two sight records from Gyeonggi province
and sight records from three other provinces in South
Korea, with the highest day count nationwide of only 40
on 9 May 2000 (on Gageo Island). In DPRK, Tomek
(2002) described it as a ‘very rare breeding species’ and
traced seven dated records, while J. W. Duckworth {in
litt. 2006) saw the species only a few times in DPRK in
1999-2004.
Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis
First noted on 1 6 May 2004, with two or three (either two
together, or two separate singing adults noted) until 1 8
May, followed by two more on 30 May, increasing to five
on 2 June 2004, when singing was noted in three parts of
the central island. No observers were present after that
time, until early August, when several juveniles/immatures
(short-tailed and lacking the adult head pattern) were
observed, with at least 13 such immatures noted on 18
August, when several were food-begging from an adult.
This constitutes the first presumed breeding record of
the species for the Korean peninsula (Robson 2004).
Although rather more skulking through much of
September (with at least ten noted still on 23 September),
birds became increasingly vocal and noticeable again in
October, when a peak of 1 5 was seen on 1 5 October 2004.
At least 12 were still present on 6 November 2004,
including a group of c. 1 0 seen flying high, moving 1 00 m
or so out to sea, and then returning to land. Several birds
were still present when observations ceased in mid-
November. In 2005, no observers were present before
early May, when again the species was noted, with three
present from 2 May onwards (K. Mochizuki in litt. 2005).
In mid-May, one or two on 1 6 May had increased to five
or more on 19 May, and six or more on 20 May, again
with frequent singing, and four adults were still present
on 3 June. Again, there were no observers on Socheong
until mid-September, when F. Crystal {in litt. 2005) noted
a ‘resident pair with two young’ on 17 September 2005.
Observations continued until the end of October, with at
least three or four on 29 October 2005 either representing
the same individuals, or newly arrived migrants.
It was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002) or
Tomek (2002). The first record for the Korean peninsula
was one photographed on Eocheong Island on 29 October
2002 (NM unpublished data, documented with
photographs on the internet). There have been several
subsequent records away from Socheong, mostly on the
south-west islands (e.g. Moores and Moores 2005).
ZlTTING ClSTICOLA Cisticola juncidis
Recorded on at least 1 7 dates: one on 3-4 June 2005, and
the remainder between 20 September and 7 November.
The highest counts were of four on 5 October 2004 and
five on 1 October 2005.
While T omek (2002) traced no records for the DPRK,
Park (2002) traced 13 sight records (but no specimens)
from Gyeonggi province, all since 1 995, including counts
of up to six birds, in all months between April and
September. First recorded in South Korea on Jeju Island
in November 1926, Park (2002) listed specimens and
sight records from three and six provinces respectively.
Based on personal observations, C. j. brunniceps is now a
widespread and locally numerous summer visitor
throughout coastal South Korea, typically breeding in
rice-fields and reed-beds. It differs markedly in e.g. song
and plumage from European-breeding birds.
Chestnut-flanked White-eye Zosterops erythropleums
Recorded on at least 1 6 dates in spring (between 1 6 April
and 3 June) and on 50 dates in autumn (between 15
September and 2 November). Accurate counts are very
difficult to make, as flocks can be fast-moving and highly
mobile. Highest counts in spring by year are five on 31
May 2003, 35 on 15 May 2004, and >100 on 19 May
2005, while in autumn, highest counts by year are 30 on
24 September 2003, >100 on 22 September 2004, and
400 on 22 September 2005 (the last by F. Crystal in litt.
2005).
Records on Socheong (and also from elsewhere on the
west coast: e.g. Moores and Moores 2005) far exceed
those traced by Park (2002), who listed one specimen
and no sight records from Gyeonggi province, and only
three sight records (seven individuals) from three other
provinces in South Korea. Tomek (2002) traced at least
1 7 records between 4 May and 1 October in DPRK while
J. W. Duckworth {in litt. 2006) found the species to be
common, and seasonally abundant, on passage in south-
central DPRK during 1999-2004.
Japanese White-eye Zosterops japonicus
Recorded on seven dates: four in spring (one on 30 May
2003, six on 26 April 2004, three on 29 April 2004 and
two on 3 May 2005, the last by K. Mochizuki in litt. 2005)
and three dates in autumn, perhaps involving two
individuals, between 8 and 13 Nov 2004. While several
were not identified to subspecies, all of the spring
individuals were identified as the subspecies Z. j. simplex ,
as was one individual photographed in November 2004
(based on e.g. pale, clean-looking underparts and
yellowish forehead).
Park (2002) listed two specimens from Gyeonggi
province (from March 1959) and two sight records (both
in December), as well as numerous specimens and sight
records from four other provinces, while Tomek (2002)
rejected the only two records in the literature for DPRK.
Spotted Bush Warbler Bradyptems thoracicus
One individual of the taxon B. (r.) davidi (probably best
considered a distinct species: David’s Bush Warbler B.
davidi [Round andLoskot 1995]), was seen in song on 19
May 2004.
Park (2002) listed one previous record for South Korea
(two B. [r.] davidi collected on 28 May 2000 in Gyeonggi
province) while Tomek (2002) traced four records for
DPRK, where she considered it a ‘scarce breeding species’.
Rusty-rumped Warbler Locustella certhiola
This migrant was not uncommon, especially in spring,
with records on 21 dates in spring between 14 May and
114
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
3 June (although there was no coverage after this period),
and on 16 dates in autumn between 4 September and 4
October. The highest counts in spring coincided with
inclement weather in mid-late May, with e.g. >45 on 1 7
May 2004 and 30 on 22 May 2005, while in autumn the
highest count was four on 20 September 2004.
Park (2002) listed ten specimens and one sight record
from Gyeonggi province and five further sight records, all
from Jeollanam province, while Duckworth (2006)
reported that the species has been seen in seven localities
in DPRK.
Middendorff’s Warbler Locustella ochotensis
At least five records, with seven on 30 May 2003 the only
spring record, and four further records of singles in autumn
on 26 September 2003, 5 September 2004, 20 September
2004, and 4 October 2004.
Park (2002) listed eight specimens from Gyeonggi
province, as well as seven specimens and two sight records
(five individuals) from diree other provinces, while T omek
(2002) listed three records from DPRK.
PLESKE’S Warbler Locuste/Ia pleskei
Vulnerable. One seen well on 20 August 2004, with
identification based e.g. on the very large bill, the more
strongly marked facial pattern than typical in
Middendorffs Warbler, the lack of streaking on the
upperparts, and the generally cold plumage tones.
Park (2002) listed six specimens from Gyeonggi
province and sight records and specimens from five other
provinces. It has been reported breeding in at least four
provinces (NM unpublished data), and there are many
records from the south-west (e.g. Anon. 2003). Tomek
(2002) included only one record for DPRK.
GRAY’S Warbler Locustella fasciolata
Recorded on 12 dates in spring between 20 May and 4
June (with no coverage beyond this date), and on at least
five dates in autumn, with singles observed between 22
August and 3 October. In spring, highest counts by year
were >20 on 3 1 May 2003, nine on 1 June 2004, and four
on 22 May 2005. This is a rather skulking species, most
often located by song in spring when it can occasionally
be very vocal ( contra Cramp 1992).
Park (2002) listed eight specimens from Gyeonggi
province, as well as sight records or specimens from three
other provinces, while Duckworth (2006) added one
further record to the five listed by Tomek (2002) for
DPRK.
PADDYFIELD Warbler Acrocephalus agricola
One was seen on 5 October 2004. Views were brief (only
c.20 seconds in total) but unimpeded and at close range
in excellent light. In direct comparison with Black-browed
Reed Warbler A. bistrigiceps, it appeared pale, lacking
rusty tones on both the underparts and upperparts, showed
darker-centred tertials, and had a long supercilium
extending well to the rear of the eye, contrasting
moderately with a darkish sub-lateral crown-stripe. The
primary projection was rather pronounced beyond the
lowest tertial, the tail appeared comparatively long, and
the bill moderately strong, with an obvious dark tip.
The species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002) or Tomek (2002). The first record for the Korean
peninsula was one photographed on Hong Island on 8
April 2004 (Park Jong-Gil in litt. 2004, documented with
photographs on the internet).
Manchurian Reed Warbler Acrocephalus tangorum
Vulnerable. This taxon was treated as conspecific with
Paddyfield Warbler A. agricola by Inskipp et al. (1996),
but separated following e.g. BirdLife International (2001).
One was poorly photographed on 20 October 2002 by
Kim Dong-Won (in litt. 2003). Identification (by NM) of
this individual in the photograph was based on the very
strong rufescent tones to the plumage, and on the
proportionately large bill having a completely unmarked
lower mandible.
The species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002) or Tomek (2002). The first record for the Korean
peninsula was one photographed on Gageo Island on 27-
28 October 2000 (NM, unpublished, documented with
photographs on the internet).
Thick-billed Warbler Acrocephalus aedon
A rather skulking but sometimes vocal migrant (as on
other west coast islands in South Korea: e.g. Moores and
Moores 2004a, 2005), noted on 1 3 dates in spring and on
14 in autumn. In spring, records were from 17 May to 2
June (with no coverage on the island after 4 June in any
of the three years), with highest counts each year of two
on 27 May 2003, five on 1 7 May 2004, and 1 5 on 22 May
2005. In autumn, it was noted between 18 August and 5
September by NM, and perhaps unexpectedly (based on
the pattern of previous records in South Korea) , between
22 September and 3 October by F. Crystal (in litt. 2005).
The highest counts each year in autumn were six on
2 September 2003, three on 2 1 August 2004, and four on
3 October 2005 (F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed only one sight record from Gyeonggi
province (17 June 2001) and specimens or sight records
from two other provinces, while Duckworth (2006)
described it as ‘rather scarce’ in inland DPRK.
Tickell’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus affinis
4"hree records, involving either three or possibly four
individuals. All called insistently, and all appeared to show
slight plumage differences. The first individual was on 1 9
May 2005 in the far south-west of the island, when it was
photographed well. On 2 1 May, two were found c. 1 .5 km
to the east. The first was especially vocal, and was watched
feeding very actively in the open, moving east up the
island with other warblers. The second was found ten
minutes later, 300 m to the west, skulking in an overgrown
stream. Both were believed to show plumage differences
from both the 1 0 May individual and also from each other
(including plumage tones of both underparts and
upperparts and details of the supercilium and lores). On
22 May 2005, one was then well watched and very poorly
photographed in a wooded gully, remaining until at least
24 May. Although believed different from all three of the
previous individuals, its location (only 50 m west of where
the second of the 21 May birds had been), the evident
rarity of the species in Korea, and the effect of different
light conditions on perception of plumage tones, means
that it is impossible to confirm this as a separate, fourth
individual.
As it is not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002) or
Tomek (2002), these records constitute the first, second
and third records for the Korean peninsula.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
115
Hume’s Warbler Phylloscopus humei
Recorded/claimed eight times in spring (c. 1 7 individuals,
including by multiple observers) between 1 6 April and 23
May, and on eight occasions (eight individuals) in autumn
between 15 October and 1 1 November. The vast majority
of the records given here were based on the combination
of: call (at least two individuals, on 19 May 2005 and on
7 November 2004, gave very distinctive hwseeooo or su-
ooo calls, perhaps suggestive of nominate P. humei , while
others gave a call rather similar to the anxiety call of P.
inomatus, only with even less sibilance: a dsiit or piit ,
perhaps suggesting P. h. mandellii ); plumage (buff-wash
to the fore-supercilium, paler ear-coverts than Yellow-
browed Warbler P. inomatus , greyer tone to the
upperparts, and greyer centres to the tertials); darker
coloured bare-parts; and behaviour, with (presumed)
Hume’s often appearing slightly sluggish and heavy when
compared to the much more abundant Yellow-browed
Warbler. Until identification criteria are better established,
through for example ringing of P. humei- type birds in
South Korea, identification of most individuals should
be considered tentative.
It was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park (2002) or
Tomek (2002). The species was first reported in South
Korea, supported by a photograph taken on Eocheong
Island on 30 October 2002 (NM, unpublished data,
documented with a photograph on the internet).
Chinese Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus yunnanensis
(Listed as P. sichuanensis in Inskipp et al. 1996, but
corrected to P. yunnanensis following Martens etal. 2004.)
One was watched at close range through binoculars for a
total of 30 seconds or more over five minutes, in a mixed
flock of feeding Phylloscopus spp. warblers on 1 6 October
2004. Identification, based on direct comparison with
Yellow-browed and Pallas’s Leaf Warblers P. proregulus ,
was based on structure (rather intermediate between these
two species) and especially on the head pattern, which
was striking in that the forehead was broadly but dully
coloured green, so the bird, while showing two wing-bars
and a rather Pallas’s-type rump, appeared to lack a median
crown-stripe during head-on views. Instead, the median
crown-stripe was greyish, apparently starting
approximately above or even a little behind the eye,
becoming broader and yellow-whitish to the rear to form
more of a pale nape-patch: somewhat suggestive of Eastern
Crowned Warbler P. coronatus. In addition, the
supercilium was yellowish-white and lacked strong amber
tones; the ear-coverts were very pale; the dark eye-stripe
was square-ended or even curled upwards to the rear,
without a hint of a downward hook or pale rear ear-covert
spot; the underparts were dull off-white with some very
faint breast streaking, duller than the Pallas’s Warbler
also present; the wing, while showing two wing-bars,
lacked the bright appearance and strong contrast of
Pallas’s, with the tertials appearing pale-tipped but
otherwise rather plain (somewhat like Hume’s Warbler);
the rump appeared paler than typical in Pallas’s; and the
bill appeared longer and heavier than Pallas’s, and in
repeated views against a dark green and brown background
was clearly brownish-black (not black) , with an obviously
paler bill-base, rather like Y ellow-browed Warbler . These
features combined created a surprisingly distinctive
impression, believed beyond the range of variation of
Pallas’s Warbler and closely matching descriptions of
Chinese Leaf Warbler in Martens et al. (2004). Calls
considered to resemble Chinese Leaf Warbler (a single
insistent, repeated, bout of harsh Pallas’s-type calls) were
heard briefly and poorly in the same area before this bird
was seen, but no calls were heard during or after the
period of observation.
The species was not listed by Lee et al. (2000), Park
(2002) orTomek (2002). This constitutes the first record
for the Korean peninsula.
Greater Short-toed Lark Calandrella brachydactyla
Recorded on nine dates in spring, with records between
14 April and 20 May, and a peak count of three on 4 May
2004 (K. Steiof in litt. 2004).
Park (2002) listed one sight record for Gyeonggi
province and only four more sight records in two other
provinces. However, it has recently proved to be a fairly
scarce but regular migrant in South Korea, with most
records in April, especially on south-western islands (e.g.
Anon. 2003, Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005).
Tomek (2002) traced only one record from DPRK, on
17 April 1929.
Russet Sparrow Passer rutilans
Three singles, on 27-28 May 2003, 2 June 2004 and
2 October 2005 (last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed no specimens or sight records for
Gyeonggi province, with records confined to four other
provinces in South Korea (and breeding on Ulleung Island
in the East Sea), while Tomek (2002) traced four records
for DPRK.
Citrine Wagtail Motacilla citreola
One on 6 October 2004.
Park (2002) noted only five records for South Korea,
all from Jeollanam province and Jeju in the south-west,
including the first record in 1999. Tomek (2002) traced
no records for DPRK.
Richard’s Pipit Anthus richardi
Recorded 21 times in spring (between 27 April and 2
June), and at least 55 times in autumn between 18 August
and 30 October, with one further record on the
exceptionally late date of 1 1 November, in 2004.
Total numbers are hard to estimate, because most
records were of birds flying over, with small numbers
sometimes remaining for several days. Highest day counts
by year in spring were two on 29 May 2003, six or more
on 14 May 2004 and eight on 18 May 2005, with an
apparent concentration of records in mid-May. In autumn,
highest counts by year were 15 on 26 September 2003,
five on 2 1 August 2004, and 1 3 on 29 September (the last
by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed four specimens and only six sig-ht
records (1 1 individuals) from Gyeonggi province, as well
as sight records from three other provinces, while
Duckworth (2006) reviewed the species’s status in DPRK,
concluding that it was probably a regular migrant, although
Blyth’s Pipit Anthus godlewskii could not be ruled out for
most records.
Blyth’s Pipit Anthus godlewskii
Nine or ten records, all of single birds, with only two in
spring (26 May 2003 and 1 June 2004), and the remainder
between 19 August and 26 September.
116
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Based on the pattern of records on Gageo Island (NM
unpublished data), and on other west coast islands (e.g.
Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005), this species
appears to be most regular between mid-April and mid-
May in South Korea. The limited coverage in April and
the first half of May on Socheong, compared with rather
more extensive coverage by observers experienced with
the species in September, needs to be considered when
interpreting the records of this species. Park (2002) listed
three specimens (two in June and one in September)
from Gyeonggi province based on Austin (1948), and
five sight records (at least eight individuals), all from
Jeollanam province between 30 April and 19 May.
Duckworth (2006) reviewed the species’s status in
DPRK, concluding that no records were adequately
documented.
Tree Pipit Anthus trivialis
One on 2 October 2003 (M. Schweizer in litt. 2003).
Park (2002) listed four records for South Korea, all
since 2000, and all in Jeollanam province. Tomek (2002)
traced no records for DPRK.
Pechora Pipit Anthus gustavi
A regular migrant (as elsewhere in coastal South Korea:
e.g. Moores and Moores 2003, 2004a, 2005, Moores
2004), most often identified by call when flying over. In
spring, it was recorded on 19 dates between 27 April and
3 June, and in autumn on 43 dates, between 21 August
and 1 1 November (the last, a single on 1 1 November
2004, being the only record after 18 October, with the
exception of one found long dead on 1 3 November 2004) .
Highest counts in spring include five on 1 5 May 2004, 22
on 17 May 2005, and >10 on 19 May 2005, while in
autumn they included five on 25 September 2003, at
least six on 20 September 2004, and eight on 24 September
2005, with records each year more or less regular until
mid-October. At several sites in South Korea, based on
personal observations and on information provided to
Birds Korea , there appear to be two main periods of Pechora
Pipit migration in both spring (‘early spring’, from c.25
April to 5 May, and ‘late spring’, from 1 5 May to 5 June)
and in autumn (‘early’ from 25 August to 5 September
and date’, from 15 September to the end of October).
Considering the timing of migration, the description of
the nominate subspecies given by Alstrom and Mild
(2003), and the apparent differences noted between earlier
migrants (when seen well, typically showing e.g. a rustier
rump, a more diffuse facial pattern and buffier-washed
underparts) and later migrating individuals (typically
appearing bolder, larger and paler), this might well be a
product of different migration strategies employed by
southern-nesting A g. menzbieri (which is considered likely
to migrate earlier, both in spring and autumn), and more
northern-nesting nominate A. g. gustavi (which is
considered likely to migrate through the Korean peninsula
later both in spring and autumn). There was one ‘early’
spring record, one on 27 April 2004, and six ‘early’ autumn
records (two on 1 September 2003, one on 3 September
2003, one on 5 September 2003, two on 2 1 August 2004,
one on 23 August 2004, and one on 5 September 2004),
with the vast majority of records falling in ‘late’ spring
and ‘late’ autumn.
Park (2002) listed 14 specimens from Gyeonggi
province (none identified unambiguously to subspecies).
but no sight records, as well as sight records and specimens
(including two identified as A. g. menzbieri) from four
other provinces. Duckworth (2006) considered it a regular
migrant through survey sites in south-central DPRK, and
much overlooked previously in the country.
Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus
A regular spring and especially autumn migrant, recorded
on six dates in spring (all April 2004), and on 25 dates in
autumn, between 1 8 September and 25 October. Highest
autumn counts by year were eight on 3 October 2003,
five on 19 September and again on 22 September 2004,
and 20 on 3 October 2005 (the last bv F. Crystal in litt.
2005).
Park (2002) listed 22 specimens and two sight records
from Gyeonggi province, with specimens and sight records
from four other provinces, while Duckworth (2006)
considered it a regular migrant through the DPRK.
Buff-bellied Pipit Anthus rubescens
A regular migrant, most often seen (and heard) in flight.
In spring, it was recorded only on three consecutive dates
(two on 1 4 and 1 5 April 2004, and one on 1 6 April 2004),
possibly because survey dates did not coincide with the
peak of likely spring migration. In autumn, it was recorded
on 30 dates between 18 September (an unexpectedly
early date as typically first recorded on western Korean
islands at the beginning of October: NM unpublished
data) and 1 3 November, with the highest counts by year
being ten on 30 October 2003, 35 on 14 October 2003
and ten on 22 October 2005. All grounded migrants were
checked carefully to confirm identification as A r.japonicus
(rather than the nominate A. r. rubescens or Water Pipit
A. spinoletta). Although the call is rather similar to that of
Water Pipit, it is distinct enough for the vast majority of
records here to be assigned confidently to A. r. japonicus.
There were no records of Water Pipit.
Park (2002) listed 21 A. r. japonicus specimens and
three sight records of A rubescens (subspecies unknown)
from Gyeonggi province with sight records from six other
provinces in South Korea. He also included one record
of A r. pacificus , collected in April 1954 in the south-east
of the country. Duckworth (2006) reassessed records of
this species and/or Water Pipit in DPRK, a species-pair
he did not distinguish, which in spring he recorded most
often between March and mid-April, a period with rather
poor observer coverage on Socheong.
Scaly-breasted Munia Lonchura punctulata
A group of seven was photographed in the south-west of
the island on 27 October 2003 following gale-force
southerly winds. The flock was searched for intensively
without success the next day, although winds remained
strong throughout. At dawn on 29 October 2003, four
(more) were found and photographed in the east of the
island.
As this species is apparently not at all usual in captivity
on the Korean peninsula, and release of caged passerines
is also extremely unusual, it can be assumed that the birds
were of natural origin. This assumption is strongly
supported by the discovery of a further flock of four
photographed on Hong Island 400 km to the south on 28
October 2003 (Anon. 2003), this being especially
remarkable considering the lack of any other known
observer activity on the west coast between these two
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
117
remote points during this period. Considering obvious
plumage differences and the Hong Island record, it appears
likely that the two Socheong flocks contained different
individuals and were perhaps part of a rather larger storm-
drifted movement of the species across the Yellow Sea
into Korea. As the species is not listed by Lee etal. (2000),
Park (2002) or Tomek (2002), the record on 27 October
2003 (documented with photographs on the internet)
represents the first for the Korean peninsula.
COMMON Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus
A regular migrant, recorded on 1 1 dates in spring between
17 May and 2 June, and on 48 dates in autumn between
19 August and 30 October. The highest spring counts by
year were one in late May 2003, two on 1 8 May 2004, and
four on 22 May 2005, while highest counts in autumn by
year include ten on 26 September 2003, 1 2 on 8 September
2004 and 58 (including a single flock of 20) on 19
September 2005 (the last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed three specimens but no sight records
from Gyeonggi province, with sight records or specimens
from three other provinces, while Duckworth (2006)
reappraised its status in DPRK, concluding that it is a
regular passage migrant there as well as a breeding species.
White- winged Crossbill Loxia leucoptera
An adult male was seen in flight in a flock of ten Common
Crossbills L. curvirostra on 23 October 2005. Although
views were brief (only c.5 seconds) they were at close to
medium-range, in excellent light, when the smaller size,
very distinct, broad and white wing-bars and the more
intense red plumage (in direct comparison with Common
Crossbills) were all very striking.
Citing Won (1970), Park (2002) listed only one
previous national record for South Korea: two together,
collected, on 15 February 1969 in Gyeongsangnam
province. Tomek (2002) traced no records for DPRK.
However, she overlooked the record (of a stuffed bird in
an exhibition) of Mauersberger (1981: 24), which
presumably involved a wild-taken bird in northern Korea.
Japanese Grosbeak Eophona personata
Three records in spring (one on 1 9 May 2004; two on 1 8
May 2005; at least three on 22 May 2005) and two in
autumn, with 25 on 11 November 2004 (after a severe
thunderstorm and strong south-easterly winds) declining
to 2 1 the next day and ten by 1 3 November, plus four on
30 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed three specimens and two sight
records from Gyeonggi province, including the national
highest count of 85 atGwangneungon 6 December 1997,
with 1 1 there on 6 February 1 998, as well as sight records
or specimens from four other provinces in South Korea.
Duckworth (2006) added approximately ten records to
the seven or eight listed by Tomek (2002) for DPRK.
PlNE Bunting Emberiza leucocephalos
Singles were seen and heard on 13 November 2004 and
23 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed eight specimens and two sight
records from Gyeonggi province (including a flock of 40
on 2 February 1992), and sight records from Jeollanam
province and Cheorwon, Gangwon province (a flock of
30 on 18 January 1996), while Duckworth (2006) and
Tomek (2002) listed about ten records in total for DPRK.
Little Bunting Emberiza pusilla
Recorded on 26 dates in spring between 22 March and 28
May, and on 50 dates in autumn between 18 September
and 12 November. The highest day counts by year in
spring were three on 28 May 2003, 20 on 26 April 2004,
and eight on 17 May 2005, and in autumn, 20 on 30
October 2003, ten on 18 October and again on 1
November 2004, and 12 on 24 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed five specimens and six sight records
(involving 38 individuals) from Gyeonggi province, as
well as sight records from six other provinces in South
Korea, while Tomek (2002) listed probably eight
records for DPRK, with the most recent in 1965, and
Duckworth (2006) listed five more, in April, May and
November.
Yellow-browed Bunting Emberiza chrysophrys
Recorded on 1 1 dates between 28 April and 22 May in
spring (when often seen singly or in pairs), and on 56
dates in autumn between 23 August and 1 November. In
autumn, especially in September, the species is
occasionally involved in larger weather-related movements
of buntings. The highest counts by year were seven on 24
September 2003, >125 on 20 September 2004, and 30
on 16 September 2005 (the last by F. Crystal in litt. 2005).
Park (2002) listed five specimens and two sight records
(involving nine birds) from Gyeonggi province, as well as
sight records from two other provinces. Tomek (2002)
traced only four past DPRK records, the most recent in
1958, with Duckworth (2006) adding a further 11-12
recent records.
Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola
Near Threatened. Recorded on at least 18 dates in spring
between 28 April and 1 June (with peak counts by year of
one on 26 May 2003, 25 on 14 May 2005, and 20 on 19-
20 May 2005), and on 14 dates in autumn (with peak
counts by year of 13 on 3 October 2003, five on 20
September 2004, and two on 2 and 26 October 2005).
Park (2002) listed 102 specimens from Gyeonggi
province alone, with most taken between 1961 and 1964
in late September and October, and six sight records
(involving 1 6 individuals) from there, with sight records
(and no specimens) from five other provinces, including
a maximum count of 60 on Gageo Island on 7 May 2000.
Tomek (2002) traced multiple records in DPRK,
concluding that it was a passage migrant and a ‘probable
breeding species in northern provinces’ (at least in the
first half of the twentieth century); it is still regular on
passage (J. W. Duckworth in litt. 2006).
Yellow Bunting Emberiza sulphurata
Vulnerable. One on 26 April 2004, two on 27 April 2004
and one on 5 May 2005 (the last by K. Mochizuki in litt.
2005).
Park (2002) listed two specimens from Gyeonggi
province (both in October, and listed in Austin 1 948) and
sight records from three other provinces in South Korea,
while Tomek (2002) traced only 1-2 records in DPRK,
the most recent in 1987.
GREY Bunting Emberiza variabilis
One or two (one of which was photographed) on 1 1
November 2004, following a severe thunderstorm and
strong south-easterly winds on 10 November.
118
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Park (2002) listed specimens or sight records from the
three southern provinces of South Korea (Jeollanam,
Gyeongsangnam and Jeju) while Tomek (2002) traced no
records for DPRK.
OCHRE-RUMPED BUNTING Emberiza yessoensis
Near Threatened. Two records, both singles, in spring
(15 May 2004 and 18 May 2005), and four records in
autumn: singles on 30 October 2004, 23 October 2005,
26-28 October 2005; and two on 29 October 2005.
Park (2002) listed nine specimens and two sight records
from Gyeonggi province (on Ganghwa Island in January
and February, totalling 19 individuals), as well as sight
records from two other provinces. Tomek (2002) traced
only 7-9 records, with Duckworth (2006) adding three
more DPRK records between 23 October and 12
November.
LAPLAND LONGSPUR Calcarius lapponicus
Three records involving four individuals, all between 5
November and 12 November 2004. Suitable habitat on
the island is very limited for this species.
Park (2002) listed 1 1 specimens and one sight record
(of a flock of 60) from Gyeonggi province, with sight records
from three other provinces in South Korea (including a
single count of 1 ,000, in Jeollabuk province in December
2001), while Tomek (2002) traced only six records, with
a further eight listed for DPRK by Duckworth (2006).
DISCUSSION
Between October 2002, when the first bird surveys were
conducted, and October 2005, at least 298 species of bird
were recorded on or from Socheong Island . By comparison,
Lee et al. (2000) traced records of only 450 species of bird
for the whole of the Korean peninsula. Of the total recorded
at Socheong, only seven species (Oriental Turtle Dove
Streptopelia orientalis, Black-tailed Gull Lams crassirostris,
Temminck’s Cormorant, Pelagic Cormorant Phalacrocorax
pelagicus, Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos, Great
Tit Pams major [ssp. minor ] , and Brown-eared Bulbul Ixos
amaurotis ) were recorded on 120 or more of the 130 days
of observation by the author, and even these species also
showed significant changes in the number recorded, either
daily or seasonally. For example, Oriental Turtle Dove
was not recorded at all in three days of observations in
mid-December 2003, but 175 were counted on 6 October
2005. Evidently, all species recorded up to now on
Socheong Island are either partially or completely
migratory.
While Socheong is especially well located for
observation of migrant birds, several related factors warrant
consideration when interpreting the records presented
above, especially habitat, weather, the incomplete coverage
so far, and observer bias.
Socheong Island has a range of habitats but the quality
of several is rather poor. There is very little freshwater or
intertidal wetland, and no Phragmites reedbeds. Partly as
a result, few larger waterbird species have been
recorded; some of those that have were either flying over
(e.g. Black Stork) or in atypical habitat (e.g. Black Bittern) .
There are few open areas of short-cropped grassland or
undisturbed arable land; most vegetable plots are heavily
disturbed and treated with insecticide. Largely as a result,
several species of lark and pipit were recorded mostly
flying over. Habitat quality and its relationship with
numbers of some other species (e.g. some buntings) is
less clear.
Weather conditions are extremely influential on bird
migration and observation of that migration on Socheong
Island, although analysis of weather systems and
migration is beyond the scope of this paper. Spring
migration involves a sea crossing of at least 200 km (from
the Shandong Peninsula to Socheong Island), and in
many cases of perhaps 800 km (from islands off the
Chinese coast near Shanghai), so that westerly and north¬
westerly winds tend to produce the largest numbers of
warblers, which often move across the island quickly,
while overshooting southern migrants tend to arrive in
south-westerly winds, and sometimes remain for longer
(e.g. Grey Bushchat, Black Drongo) . In autumn, on the
other hand, migrants moving south-west or south out of
the Korean peninsula reach Socheong by a short sea
crossing, but then need to cross at least 200 km of open
sea to the west (resulting in birds circling the island in
autumn much more often than in spring, especially in
hazy conditions).
In addition, the largest numbers of individuals of many
species in both spring and autumn appear as weather
fronts pass, especially those that produce heavy overnight
rain. For example, rain on 29 May and early on 30 May
in 2003 coincided with highest counts so far of late spring
migrants like Tiger Shrike Lanins tigrinus (35 individuals)
and Gray’s Warbler (>20 individuals), and with Korea’s
first record of Chinese Thrush; an evening rain shower
on 21 September 2005 coincided with an arrival of 3, 000
Asian House Martins (7 5 times higher than any previously
published day count of the species in South Korea, and
30 times higher than any other day count on Socheong);
and a severe thunderstorm and Beaufort force 7 south¬
easterly winds on 10 November and until dawn of 1 1
November 2004 resulted in an exceptional arrival of e.g.
at least 17 Japanese Thrushes, an exceptionally late
Pechora Pipit, Korea’s northernmost record of Grey
Bunting and the Korean peninsula’s first autumn record
of Japanese Robin. It can be assumed from such weather-
related arrivals, and by the comparatively low numbers
of grounded migrants often found in calm and hazy
weather, that in certain weather conditions much larger
numbers of birds pass over or near the island than are
recorded on it. It is also probable that while some species
(on the available data presented above) appear to be
most regular within a certain week, month or months,
this apparent pattern is likely to have been strongly
influenced by weather conditions experienced in 2003,
2004 and 2005, because weather events can reveal (e.g.
with Rusty-rumped Warbler: see above), or perhaps
distort, underlying migration patterns. Extreme weather
events also produce more out-of-season and unexpected
records than calm and clear weather at the same time of
year, and they might, over time, result in an increasing
number of exceptionally early records of overshooting
migrants in spring, or late migrants in autumn.
Coverage on Socheong Island has been limited up to
now in other ways too. The island is too large and densely
vegetated to be covered adequately in a single day
(especially by a single observer), so that day-counts for
some species will be too low, while other species will
have been missed completely. This has been
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
119
demonstrated clearly on the 1 5 or so days in which several
observers were present and the species and their numbers
were discussed between observers: no observer saw all
individuals or all species recorded on such days. In
addition, surveying has not yet been conducted in all
months (there has been none in January, February or
July), and on only a few dates in three others (i.e. no
coverage in March before 22 March; no coverage in June
after 4 June; and coverage for only three days in
December). This paper is therefore based on only 130
days’ survey, spread across nine months of the year by the
author, concentrated at times of spring and autumn
migration, with counts on five days in March, nine in
April, 22 in May, seven in June, six in August, 25 in
September, 39 in October, 14 in November and three in
December. This is supplemented by c.42 days of records
by other observers in the same months (some dates
overlapping with NM’s), as detailed above. As a result of
the timing of these observations, some early spring
migrants (such as Buff-bellied Pipit) are probably greatly
under-recorded, while dates for several species probably
extend well beyond the 4 June coverage. Falls of migrants
can still occur until mid-June in coastal Hebei (J. Hornskov
in litt. 2004); and observations on Eocheong Island in
2005 revealed the presence there of species such as Arctic
Warbler Phylloscopus borealis and Black Drongo as late as
7 June (NM unpublished data). This is perhaps most
significant in spring for very late-migrating species like
Gray’s Warbler (which might occur in significant numbers
outside the dates of survey). In the same way, some late
movements of migrants in autumn probably fall outside
the dates covered up to now, and some species can be
expected to occur beyond the latest autumn dates specified
in the text. Clearly, as the records in this paper derive
from patchy coverage of only three springs and four
autumns, it would be unwise to interpolate too much
from them on timing of a given species’s migration.
Finally, coverage by different observers is also likely to
create some element of inconsistency, with different areas
checked, and different styles of recording migrants flying
over. Based on prolonged personal observation from three
fixed points, diurnal migrants in spring often move rapidly
east in direct flight (such as Grey-faced Buzzard) or north¬
east up the island, moving from one belt of vegetation to
the next (e.g. flycatchers), while in autumn many pipits
and raptors move south-west down the island at dawn,
returning within 30 minutes or so, to move back east up
the island, and then away north-west depending on the
visibility. In such circumstances it is especially easy to
double- (or even triple-!) count certain species (especially
raptors, which often circle the island for an hour or more),
and some more vocal diurnal migrants like Chestnut-
flanked White-eye and Common Rosefinch.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is much richer for the many contributions made by other
birders, including all participants of Birds Korea tours to the island. In
addition, many thanks to Kim Dong-Won, Park Jin-Young, Thomas
Hemicke, Jurgen Steudtner, Toshikazu Onishi, Yozo Ivoshiyama,
Atsushi Igari, Tim Edelsten, Robin Newlin, Kenji Mochizuki, and
most especially Fergus Crystal and Klemens Steiof for so generously
sharing and annotating their records. In addition, many thanks to Park
Jong-Gil and Kim Sung-Hyun for information from south-western
islands, and to all colleagues in Birds Korea (most especially Park Meena
and Charlie Moores) for help with arranging data and for their most
valuable support. Finally, I am also very grateful to Will Duckworth for
sharing his records from DPRK, both those yet unpublished and those
still in press, and also to the referees for their most helpful advice.
REFERENCES
Alstrom, P. and Mild, K. (2003) Pipits and wagtails of Europe, Asia and
North America. London: Christopher Helm.
Anon. (2003) [Hong Do area migratory bird monitoring report.
December 2003.] National Parks Association, Tadohae Western
Management Office. (In Korean.)
Austin, O. L., Jr (1948) The birds of Korea. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool.
Harvard Univ. 101: 1-301.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2006) Species factsheets. Available at
www.birdlife.org/datazone.
Brazil, M. A. (1991) The birds of Japan. London: Christopher Helm.
Conzemius, T. (2001) Die Superspezies Raubwurger Lanius [excubitor]
in der Westpalaarktis. Limicola 15: 185-227.
Cramp, S., ed. (1992) The birds of the Western Palearctic Vol. 6. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Duckworth, J. W. (2004) Eight birds new to DPR Korea. Forktail 20:
116-120.
Duckworth, J. W. (2006) Records of some bird species hitherto rarely
found in DPR Korea. Bull. Brit. Om. Club. 126: 252-290.
Earnst, S. L. (2004) Status assessment and conservation plan for the Yellow¬
billed Loon (Gavia adamsii). Denver, U.S.A.: US Geological Survey.
Fennell, C. M. (1952) Some observations on the birds of southern
Korea. Condor 54: 101-110.
Fennell, C. M. (1966) Occurrence of the Lesser Frigate-bird and Pale¬
footed Shearwater in Korea. Condor 68: 210-21 1 .
Fiebig, J. (1993) Dreijahrige ornithologische Studien in Nordkorea.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 69, Supplement:
Annalen fur Omithologie 17: 93-146.
Gore, M. E. J. and Won, Pyong-Oh (1971) Birds of Korea. Seoul: Royal
Asiatic Society.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Lee, H., Lee, S.-W., Lee, K.-S. and Paek, W.-K. (2004) The wintering
status of Cinereous Vultures ( Aegypius monachus ) in Korea. P. 237
in S.-J. Rhim, J.-S. Kim, O.-K. Chung and S.-J. Park, eds. Proc.
2004 Intern. Symp. Migratory’ Birds, Gunsan. Seoul: Korean
Ornithological Society.
Lee, W.-S., Koo, T.-H. and Park, J.-Y. (2000) A field guide to the birds
of Korea. Seoul: LG Evergreen Foundation.
Lethaby, N. and Moores, N. (1999) Identification of Temminck’s
Cormorant. Dutch Birding 21: 1-8.
Macfarlane, A. M. (1963) Field notes on the birds of Korea. Ibis 105:
319-326.
Martens, J., Tietze, T. T., Eck, S. and Veith, M. (2004) Radiation and
species limits in the Asian Pallas’s Leaf Warbler complex
(Phylloscopus proregulus s.l.). J. Omithol. 145:206-222.
Mauersberger, G. (1981) Anmerkungen zur Avifauna Nordkoreas.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 57, Supplement:
Annalen fur Omithologie 5: 15-62.
Moores, N. (1996) Pacific Divers in Japan. Birding World 9: 320.
Moores, N. (2004) Pechora Pipit Anthus gustavi in South Korea: some
pieces in the menzbieri! gustavi puzzle? Available at: http://
www.birdskorea.org/pechora2004.asp
120
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Moores, N and Moores, C. (2002) Birds Korea Year Review 2002.
Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/BL_alllinks.asp
Moores, N and Moores, C. (2003) Birds Korea Year Review 2003.
Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/BL_alllinks.asp
Moores, N and Moores, C. (2004a) Birds Korea Year Review 2004.
Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/BL_alllinks.asp
Moores, N. and Moores, C. (2004b) A presumed Steppe Grey Shrike
(. Lanins pallidirostris ) on Socheong island, S Korea. Biological Letters
41: 163-166.
Moores, N and Moores, C. (2005) Birds Korea Year Review 2005.
Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/BL_alllinks.asp
Neff, D. J. (1956) Birds of Yang-Do, Korea. Auk 73: 551-555.
Park Jin-Y oung (2002) Current status and distribution of birds in Korea.
Seoul: Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University.
(Unpublished thesis in Korean with English abstract.)
Purchase, D. (1971) Sixteenth annual report of the Australian bird-banding
scheme, July 1969 June 1970. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Wildlife
Research (Technical paper 22).
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Robson, C. (comp.) (2004) From the field: South Korea. BirdingASIA
2: 101-102.
Round, P . D . and Loskot, V. (1995)A reappraisal of the taxonomy of
the Spotted Bush-Warbler Bradypterus thoracicus. Forktail 10: 159-
172.
Stepanyan, L. S. (1998) Materials to the ornithological fauna of the
Korean peninsula. Ortnithologia 28: 114-119. (In Russian with
English summary and title.)
Svensson, L., Collinson, M., Knox, A. G., Parkin D. T., and Sangster,
G. (2005) Species limits in the Red-breasted Flycatcher. Brit. Birds
98: 538-541.
Tomek, T. (1999, 2002) The birds of North Korea. Acta Zoologica
Cracoviensia 42: 1-217; 45: 1-235.
Won Pyong-Oh (1970) Noteworthy bird records from Korea. Condor
72: 479.
Nial Moores, Birds Korea, 1009 Ho 3 Dong, Samick Tower Apt., Namcheon-2 Dong, Su Young-Gu, Busan 613-762,
South Korea. Email: spoonbillkorea@yahoo.com
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
121
APPENDIX
Bird species recorded on Socheong Island, South Korea, during 2002-2005.
122
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Forktail 23 (2007)
Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea
123
124
NIAL MOORES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Key
A = Recorded on more than 100 dates by the author (i.e. largely resident or
resident with numbers increased by migrants); B = Recorded on 10-100 dates
by the author (i.e. evidently a regular migrant); C = Recorded on fewer than ten
dates by all observers combined.
Abundance (all observers combined) : 1 = peak day count of < 1 0; 2 = peak day
count of 1 1-100; 3 = peak count of 101-1,000; 4 = peak count of >1,000.
Breeding evidence: (Ne)= observed carrying nesting material; (N)= incubating
bird, or nest found; (FY)= adults observed feeding fledged young, or presence
of recently fledged juveniles; (BR?)= no direct evidence, but presence of multiple
individuals at appropriate season, and known to breed on adjacent islands.
Note: with such limited survey effort, it would be premature to accord too
detailed a status comment to the majority of species.
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 125-128
Observations on the Siamese Fireback
Lophura diardi in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand
NICHAYA PRADITSUP, AMARA NAKSATHIT and PHILIP ROUND
The social behaviour of the Near Threatened Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi was studied in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand, during
May 2002-April 2003. Seven types of displays were recorded: wing-whirring, threatening, chasing, fighting, courtship, and submissive
and displacement behaviour. The wing-whirring display was performed chiefly by males. Single males gave whirring displays more often
than multiple-male groups, while males in male-only groups performed whirring more often than those in mixed-sex groups. Birds wing-
whirred more frequently in the breeding season than the non-breeding season. Wing-whirring did not appear to be part of courtship
behaviour, but was more likely related to dominance or territoriality.
INTRODUCTION
The Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi is found in mainland
South-East Asia in Cambodia, Lao PDR, Vietnam, eastern
Myanmar, and northern and eastern Thailand (Johnsgard
1999). It is classified globally as Near Threatened
(BirdLife International 2001). Like other Lophura spp.
pheasants, it has been relatively little studied in the wild.
There have been recent studies on captive propagation
(Boonsanong and Ruknongped 2000a, b) and genetics
(Randi et al. 2001), but few details are known about its
ecology and behaviour. The objectives of this study were
to examine the types and functions of the displays,
determine the composition of social groups and investigate
the breeding system of the species.
STUDY AREA AND METHODS
The study was conducted on the lower slopes of Khao
Khieo, Khao Yai National Park, Thailand, (14°24'N
101°22/E) during May 2002-April 2003. The study site
was in semi-evergreen forest at c.760 m. Observations
were made at c.06h00-18h00 on 8-13 days per month.
The observer (NP) walked slowly along 2 km of road until
Siamese Firebacks were encountered. They were then
followed as closely as possible without disturbing them.
The date, time, group composition, duration and type of
all behaviours and displays were noted, and were assigned
to sex and individual where possible.
RESULTS
A total of 232 encounters with Siamese Fireback were
made during 136 days of fieldwork. Birds were followed
for a combined total of 2,609 minutes during 173
encounters (the remaining 59 encounters were too brief
to conduct observations). Encounters lasted up to 229
minutes (median: 8 minutes), but most were relatively
short because the birds were shy and it was not usually
possible to follow them when they moved into dense
vegetation.
Displays
Seven types of display were recorded.
Wing-whirring
In this display, birds stood erect and flapped their
outstretched wings noisily for c.2-5 seconds. Sonagrams
indicated that the wings were flapped 10.8-11.4 times
per second (N = 3; Fig. 1). The flapping occurred in two
bouts of flaps separated by an interval of 0.25-0.27 sec.
The duration of each element was 0.009-0.049 seconds.
During wing- whirring by males, the golden-yellow feathers
on the lower back and rump were prominent. Wing¬
whirring was observed 474 times, during 77 out of 232
encounters. This display was mainly given by males
(99.2% of 474 wing-whirrs, 96.1% of 77 encounters
involving wing-whirrs) .Females wing-whirred only rarely
(0.8% of 474 wing-whirrs, 3.9% of77 encounters involving
wing-whirrs) . There was no detectable difference between
the sexes in their posture when wing-whirring nor in the
sound made.
Wing-whirring was given both by solitary males (54.7%
of 470 male wing-whirrs) and by males in flocks (45.3%
of 470 male wing-whirrs), although usually only one male
appeared to wing-whirr in any flock (77.7% of 27
encounters involving wing-whirrs in flocks). Males often
wing-whirred preceding and/or following fighting,
chasing and threatening (ll%of470male wing-whirrs) .
When a male Siamese Fireback heard the whirring
sound from another individual, it usually responded by
stopping any activity, holding its head up, standing erect
and looking around (21 out of 31 encounters, 68%),
gave whirring in response (nine encounters, 29%), or
moved toward the sound and chased the bird involved
(one out of 31 encounters, 3%). Rarely, Siamese Firebacks
whirred in response to the sound of a falling branch (once)
or to a loud call from muntjac deer Muntiacus muntjak
(twice).
Individuals could not usually be distinguished and
hence identified from one encounter to another. Flowever,
KHz I.O-i
0.8 -
0.6-
S 1.0 2.0 3.0
Figure 1. Sonagram of a typical single bout of wing-whirring by male
Siamese Fireback.
126
NICHAYA PRADITSUP, AMARA NAKSATHIT and PHILIP ROUND
Forktail 23 (2007)
Figure 2. Mean (+S.E.) rate at which Siamese Fireback males gave
wing-whirrs through the year.
when flocks were observed, an effort was made to
distinguish between individuals during the period of
observation, and the maximum whirring rate was
calculated from the individual that whirred most
frequently. Using these data, solitary males whirred more
often than the apparently dominant male in multiple-
male groups (0.40 whirring bouts/minute, N = 54
encounters and 7 5 8 observation-minutes vs . 0 . 1 6 whirring
bouts/minute, N = 33 encounters and 231 observation-
minutes; Mann-Whitney U-Test: Z - -2.528, P= 0.01 1)
or in mixed-sex groups (0.15 whirring bouts/minute, N
= 76 encounters, 1,462 observation-minutes; Z = -2.936,
P = 0.003). Males never whirred to females.
Siamese Firebacks showed wing-whirring displays
almost throughout the year. The rate of whirring was
lowest during November-February. No whirring was
heard in January, but the whirring-rate increased from
February until April (Fig. 2). Birds whirred in the
presumed breeding season (March-June) more than in
the non-breeding season (Z = -2.69, P < 0.05).
Threatening
Typically the threatening display involved an aggressor
moving to within c. 1 m of another individual, turning to
face it, and pecking at the other individual, although
without actual physical contact. It was usually performed
when one bird displaced another at a food resource (at
least half of occasions observed). The threatening display
was usually given by a male to another male (seven times,
70%), but occasionally also by a male to a female (twice,
20%) and a female to a female (once, 1 0%). The threatened
birds responded by showing submissive postures (five
times), displacement behaviour (twice; see below) or by
walking away (twice, including one occasion when a female
responded by leaping into the air before walking away).
Chasing
This was when one individual ran at, and displaced, another
individual. It was sometimes accompanied by a high-
pitched veed call given by the chaser. Chasing was usually
preceded by whirring or threat (4 1.7% of 1 2 observations)
and in four out of 1 2 observations of chasing (33%), it was
followed by fighting. Chasing was only seen between males .
contact. Invariably this involved both birds clashing as
they jumped into the air. Fighting was observed on 1 1
occasions and lasted up to two minutes; it was only seen
between males.
Submissive
In this display, the bird lowered its head in response to
threatening behaviour from another individual. Eight
occasions (89%) involved males responding to threatening
males (three of these occasions involved fighting), and
one occasion (11%) involved a female responding to a
threatening male.
Courtship
This typically began with the male running around a female
while she remained still. Then the male moved to her
side, fanning his tail side-to-side, then moved in front of
her and pecked her neck and red facial skin on each side
alternately. No copulation was observed. Courtship
displays were observed four times: on 13 August, 18
December and 20 and 2 1 January. All the observations of
courtship were made in flocks of 4-7 individuals; the
other flock-members foraged nearby during courtship
displays. The duration of courtship display was 2-13
minutes.
Displacement behaviour
Displacement behaviours are usually given in situations
in which there is a conflict between two mutually exclusive
actions (McFarland 1981). Possible displacement
behaviours we observed included bill-wiping on the
ground after fighting with a male Silver Pheasant Lophura
nycthemera (once), pecking at the ground when threatened
by another male (once), and preening by a female when
another female threatened her (once).
Group-size and composition
Flock-size ranged up to ten individuals (median group
size=2; Fig. 3). Most encounters were with single males
(86 of 232 encounters, 37.1%), or mixed-sex flocks (62
encounters, 26.7%), with the remainder comprising pairs
(23 encounters, 10%), male-only flocks (49 encounters,
21.1%), female-only flocks (2 encounters, 0.9%) and
single females (10 encounters, 4.3%). Among mixed-sex
flocks, males outnumbered females in 46.8% (29 of 62
encounters), females outnumbered males in 29% (18
encounters) and equal numbers were found in 24.2% (15
encounters). During the probable breeding season
(March-June), significantly more pairs (18 encounters)
Fighting
Fighting was defined as an aggressive, head-on
confrontation between two individuals, involving physical
Flock size
Figure 3. Frequency distribution of encounters of Siamese Fireback
flocks of different sizes.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Observations on the Siamese Fireback in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand
127
Month
Figure 4. Seasonal occurrence of pairs and other mixed-sex flocks of
Siamese Fireback.
were found than other mixed-sex flock combinations
(seven encounters) (%2 = 4.84, df = 1 ,P= 0.028; Fig. 4).
Single females and female-only groups were found in
June, December, March and April, while male-only flocks
were encountered almost throughout the year.
Interactions with other species
Silver Pheasant and Red Junglefowl G alius gallus were
seen a total of 66 and 178 times, respectively. During 40
encounters with Siamese Firebacks (17.2% of 232
encounters), distributed throughout the year, a single
male Silver Pheasant (presumably the same individual)
associated with the flock of Siamese Firebacks. On 1 1
occasions (during February and March), the male Silver
Pheasant displayed aggression to a male Siamese Fireback
by threatening (five occasions), chasing (three) and
fighting (three). Usually (10 occasions) the male Silver
Pheasant appeared to be dominant, with the male Siamese
Fireback showing displacement behaviour (bill wiping)
and submissive postures following the interaction.
However, on one occasion a male Siamese Fireback
apparently won the bout, and the Silver Pheasant flew off.
Red Junglefowl also accompanied Siamese Firebacks
on 1 1 occasions (4.7%); involving a single male junglefowl
(eight occasions), a single female (two occasions) and a
pair (one occasion). On one occasion, a male Red
Junglefowl threatened a male Siamese Fireback and
displaced it from a food resource.
DISCUSSION
Wing-whirring displays are prominent in several pheasant
taxa such as Tragopan spp., Syrmaticus spp. and Lophura
spp. (Johnsgard 1999). Some previous authors have stated
that wing-whirring in Lophura spp. was associated with
courtship displays (e.g. Silver Pheasant: Beebe 191 8—
1922; Imperial Pheasant L. imperialis: Delacour 1977
and Swinhoe’s Pheasant L. swinhoii: Johnsgard 1 999) . In
Kalij Pheasant L. leucomelanos , both sexes showed peak
wing-whirring activity at the beginning of the main phase
of courtship, but there was no indication that wing¬
whirring had a courtship function (Breuer and Thomas
1990). Davison (1981) observed that male Crested
Firebacks L. ignita in Malaysia wing-whirred only during
the period when pairs were encountered (May-June) and
he also proposed that wing-whirring was linked with mate
attraction. The present study found that male Siamese
Firebacks neither wing-whirred during courtship-related
displays, nor whirred directly to females. Moreover, males
in all-male groups whirred more than those in mixed-sex
groups. Wing-whirring in Siamese Firebacks therefore
did not appear to be linked with courtship behaviour.
Wing-whirring in Lophura has also previously been
suggested as a male-male challenge display (del Hoyo et
al. 1994), or for territorial advertisement (Johnsgard
1999). Breuer and Thomas (1990) proposed that wing¬
whirring in Kalij Pheasant was linked with a territorial
function even in the females because this display contains
an aggressive component. Wing-flapping in domestic
chickens Gallus gallus domesticus has been shown to be
linked with social rank: dominant males wing-flapped
significantly more often than subordinate males in the
presence of a model female (Leonard and Zanette 1 998) .
Rimlinger (1985) suggested thatmale Bulwer’s Pheasants
Lophura bulweri may identify each other’s ranges through
hearing whirring, even when the other males were out of
view.
Wing-whirring in the Siamese Fireback is probably
related either to male territoriality or to threat and
dominance among males. The fact that single males
whirred more frequently than did males in groups does
not necessarily rule out any link with dominance hierarchy.
It could be that males join flocks for feeding or anti¬
predation benefits, having already established dominance
relations through listening to each other wing-whirring
solitarily.
Although male wing-whirring was not associated with
courtship display it could still play a role in mate attraction.
Females would be expected to prefer a high-ranking male
that would provide increased access to resources or higher
reproductive success (Graves et al. 1985, Leonard and
Zanette 1998). If wing-whirring is related to social rank
and male quality, it would be in a female’s interest to
select a partner who whirrs at a high rate. Female domestic
chickens have been reported to select their mates from
among those that had the highest wing-flapping rate
(Leonard and Zanette 1998).
During our study, Siamese Fireback groups varied in
size and sex composition. The sex composition in groups
presumably reflects the mating system (Lack 1968). The
preponderance of males in mixed-sex groups indicates
that Siamese Fireback does not practise harem polygyny
because in polygynous species groups are usually
composed of one male and several females (Collias and
Saichuae 1967, del Hoyo etal. 1994). The fact that pairs
were mainly found during the breeding season strongly
suggests monogamy. Alternatively, one dominant male
could accompany, and mate with, two or more females in
succession (successive or sequential polygyny) or achieve
the majority of matings within the group. Marking birds
so that they are individually recognisable, in combination
with genetic studies, would help to resolve these
speculations about the mating system. Since both Siamese
Fireback and Silver Pheasant were found in the study
area, detailed studies should also be initiated to determine
their ecological relationships and the types of interaction
between them.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Professor Pilai Poonswad for valuable comments and
assistance. The Hornbill Research Project, Thailand, provided
128
NICHAYA PRADITSUP, AMARA NAKSATHIT and PHILIP ROUND
Forktail 23 C2007)
accommodation and loaned field equipment in Khao Yai National
Park. This project was funded by Mahidol University.
REFERENCES
Beebe, W. (1918-1922) A monograph of the pheasants. London:
Witherby.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Boonsanong, S. and Rugnongped, S. (2000a) [Breeding, incubation
and brooding of Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi.] Bangkok:
Wildlife Research Division, Royal Forest Department.
(Unpublished report in Thai.)
Boonsanong, S. and Rugnongped, S. (2000b) [Feeding and growth
rate of Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi .] Bangkok: Wildlife
Research Division, Royal Forest Department. (Unpublished report
in Thai.)
Breuer, H. and Thomas, E. (1990) Flugelschwirren beim
Weisshaubenfasan ( Lophura leucomelana hamiltoni). Vogelwarte
35(4): 268-278.
Collias, N. E. and Saichuae, P. (1967) Ecology of the Red Junglefowl
in Thailand and Malaya with reference to the origin of domestication.
Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 22: 189-209.
Davison, G. W. H. (1981) Habitat requirements and food supply of the
Crested Fireback. World Pheasant Assoc. J. 6: 40-52.
Delacour,J. (1977) The pheasants of the world. Second edition. Hindhead,
U.K.: World Pheasant Association and Spur Publications.
Graves, H. B., Hable, C. P. and Jenkins, T. H. (1985) Sexual selection
in Gallus: effects of morphology and dominance on female spatial
behaviour. Behav. Processes. 11: 189-197.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. eds. (1994) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 2. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Johnsgard, P. A. (1999) The pheasants of the world: biology and natural
history. Second edition. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution
Press.
Lack, D. (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London:
Methuen.
Leonard, M. L. and Zanette, L. (1998) Female mate choice and male
behaviour in domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 56: 1099-1 105.
McFarland, D. (1 98 1) The Oxford companion to animal behaviour. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Randi, E., Lucchini, V., Hennache, A., Kimball, R. T., Braun E. L.
andLigon,J. D. (2001) Evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control
region and cytochrome b genes and the inference of phylogenetic
relationships in the avian genus Lophura (Galliformes). Molec.
Phylog. Evol. 19: 187-201.
Rimlinger, D. S. (1985) Observation on the display of the Bulwer’s
Pheasant. World Pheasant Assoc. J. 10: 15-26.
Nichaya Praditsup, Department of Biology’, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand. Present address: Aquatic Resources Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Bangkok
10330, Thailand. Email: nichaya_p@yahoo.com
Amara Naksathit, Department of Biology , Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Email: grans@mahidol. ac. th
Philip Round, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Email: pdround@ksc. th. com N
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 129-134
The Hall collection of birds from Wonsan,
central Korea, in spring 1903
P. R. SWEET, J.W. DUCKWORTH, T.J. TROMBONE and L. ROBIN
The world’s museums hold few bird specimens from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). The 213 specimens from
Robert Hall’s brief stop in Korea in April-May 1903 (mostly from Wonsan) are herein listed in full, illuminated by the letters of Hall’s
assistant, Ernie Trebilcock. The collection contains mostly common Korean birds but also includes the first Korean Greater Sand Plovers
Charadrius leschenaultii and other noteworthy records. Reanalysis reveals there is no acceptable record of Crested Lark Galerida cristata
from eastern DPRK.
In the first English-language review of the birds of Korea,
Austin (1948) wrote that ‘nowhere in the literature can I
find any mention of the fact that Hall stopped off for two
weeks at Wonsan en route from Melbourne to Vladivostok,
and collected over 200 birds there!’. Wonsan lies in the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) at
39°09'N 1 27°25'E, and the excitement communicated by
Austin is even more apt today. Extant, publicly accessible
specimens from the DPRK have a scientific value far
exceeding those from most other countries, reflecting a
unique combination of circumstances. Few Western
explorer-collectors ever visited the country, it never being
a European colony, and hence few specimens arrived in
Europe during the main global collection-building phase
of the 1870s-l 930s. Japan ruled Korea from 1910 to 1945
and Japanese collectors were active in Korea during these
decades; tragically, many of the skins exported to Japan
were destroyed by earthquakes or during the Second World
War (Austin 1948). During the following decade’s strife,
collections in Korea were largely lost (Austin 1948) and
the only fresh northern collection exported seems to be
that of Neff (1956).
The DPRK was born in 1 948 and followed a policy of
self-reliance, which included the building up of a national
zoological collection largely through the hard work and
diligence ofWon Hong Koo (1963-1965). This collection,
held at the DPR Korea Academy of Sciences, Pyongyang,
is documented in Tomek (1999, 2002), and its scale was
a remarkable achievement in the straitened circumstances
of the fledgling republic. However, some time after Won’s
death on-3 October 1970, its curation went into decline
and, for example, specimen labels were re-written. As
elsewhere (see Rasmussen and Prys-Jones 2003) this
reduces reliability of data, and on some specimens an
original label left attached proves that data were not
transcribed correctly. It follows that for the unknown
proportion of skins with only the re-written label, some
data will be erroneous (Tomek 1999, 2002). Despite several
attempts during the 3 V4 years in which JWD lived in DPRK,
he was unable to obtain access to this irreplaceable
collection. It is possible that the collection has, with the last
decade’s national economic hardships, deteriorated largely
or entirely beyond salvation. If so, the majority of DPRK.
specimens ever collected are gone. A few specimens have
been sent out of DPRK in the last 50 years (Csorba and
Demeter 1989, Baldi and Waliczky 1992,Fiebig 1995: 92,
Tomek 1999: 3, 2002: 3), but essentially the world’s
museums lack material from the country.
Robert Hall (1867-1949; Fig. 1) was an Australian
ornithologist who, along with his companion R. E. ‘Ernie’
Trebilcock ( 1 880-1976), travelled to Siberia and collected
around the Lena river during summer 1903 (Hall 1904,
1919, Hartert and Hall 1 904, Sharland 1 949, Kloot 1 986,
Robin 2001). His plan was to explore this poorly known
region and, in particular, to search for the breeding
grounds of shorebirds that winter in Australia (Sharland
1978). En route for Vladivostok by ship, Hall and
Trebilcock stopped in Korea and collected birds, posting
>200 skins to the Rothschild Collection at Tring, U.K.,
through a £50 sale arranged by telegraph during the
expedition itself (Sharland 1978, Kloot 1986). They were
received on 22 August 1 903 (Rothschild acquisition book,
Archives American Museum of Natural History [AMNH]
Ornithology Dept.) and subsequently, with that collection,
went to the AMNH, where they still are. Austin had time
only to trace some 50 of the skins, and for the subsequent
half-century the others remained in anonymity, ignored
Figure 1. Robert Hall and field companion in Korea on his way to
eastern Siberia, 1903. Photo by R. E. Trebilcock. Reproduced from
Sharland (1978). Courtesy National Library of Australia.
130
P. R. SWEET et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
* Identification confirmed by critical re-examination.
1 From Rothschild label or AMNH catalogue; races not in Dickinson (2003) or where the range in that source does not include Korea are within
inverted commas.
2 Assigned from the specimen tags, except for the Common Merganser, the date of which was given in a Trebilcock letter.
3 Wonsan records fromTomek (1999, 2002) through checking the references therein, supplemented by Clark (1910), Cumming (1933: 41) and
Stepanyan (1998). ‘Recent’ indicates records, often multiple, after 1977, and ‘T’ indicates a previously unpublished record from H. Tauchnitz
(per J. Fiebig in litt. 2003). Species recorded by these sources but not collected by Hall are not listed here.
4 Hall’s skin(s) of the species is/are referred to in Austin (1948) and, hence, were assigned erroneously by Tomek (1999, 2002) to Hamgyong
South province.
Forktail 23 (2007)
The Hall collection of birds from Wonsan, central Korea
131
even inTomek’s (1999, 2002) wide-ranging review of the
birds of northern Korea, although the sole globally
threatened species in the collection (Oriental Stork Ciconia
boyciana) was included in BirdLife International’s (200 1 )
record collation. The lack of research interest in Hall’s
Korean collection is the more surprising because at the
time Australian newspapers made much of the fact that
he had collected specimens of half the then-known Korean
avifauna (Sharland 1978). Ongoing databasing in the
AMNH Department of Ornithology, led by TJT, has
now traced all the specimens. Hence, we can now finally
detail the birds, a century after the trip, a case of Collar
and Rudyanto’s (2003: 97) statement that ‘so much
unpublished information resides on the labels of specimens
in. ..natural history museums. ..that a visit to any one of
them represents something of a voyage of discovery in
miniature’.
Specimens at elevated risk of misidentification were
verified through critical re-examination by PRS (except
that K. Mild determined all Alauda specimens and L.
Svensson the Pams montanus), and other specimens were
checked rapidly when reviewing labels. Wonsan, given on
the labels as ‘Gensan’, the Japanese rendering of the name,
is the main collecting locality, accounting for 197 of the
skins (Table 1). There are also 16 specimens from
elsewhere or of uncertain locality (Table 2). A pheasant
labelled ‘purchased in Seoul’ has no field label and there
is no independent evidence how it came into Hall’s
possession; no doubt it explains the discrepancy in total
count between the 212 skins noted in Lord Rothschild’s
accession book and the actual total of 213 Korean birds
from Hall now in AMNH. The two men shot pheasants
at Busan (Trebilcock letters) but this could not possibly
be presented as Seoul.
The labelling of the skins initially led to some confusion
and doubts about the dates and provenance of some
specimens. Three letters sent by Trebilcock to his fiancee
Miss Hester ‘Hessie’ Tymms, now deposited in the
Australian Manuscripts Collection of the State Library of
Victoria (M$ 9247: Royal Australian Ornithologists’
Union Archives), helped to resolve questions regarding
the itinerary, as well as added additional information for
some species. In his first letter, which takes a diary form,
Trebilcock explained the difficulties in leaving ‘Fusan’ (=
Busan, in southern Korea; 35°06'N 129°03'E) during a
typhoon. Several attempts were made to reach Wonsan,
which Trebilcock mentioned as a planned halt. Their ship
left Busan on 2 1 , 22 and 25 April and was each time forced
back by severe weather. They were then detained until 29
April by lack of coal. On 27 April Trebilcock reported that
he and Hall went shooting in ‘the ranges behind Fusan’
and indeed there are five specimens from this date labelled
‘Fusan’, clearly in his hand (Table 2). Confusion still
arises from ten specimens labelled ‘Corea’, four from 24
April and six from 27 April, and from 1 4 specimens labelled
‘Gensan’ from 27 April. According to dates in Trebilcock’ s
letter, the Australians could not have arrived in Wonsan
until 30 April at the earliest. The remaining skins, collected
from 30 April to 1 0 May, as well as one undated skin (see
Common Merganser) are all labelled ‘Gensan’. Because
of the problems with the 24 specimens, PRS made a critical
examination of the handwriting and paper type of the
original field labels of these specimens. While Hall did
number the specimens, it seems that these numbers were
added subsequent to collecting and were not given
sequentially as “field numbers”; hence they are not useful
in resolving the discrepancies. Nor do there seem to be
any surviving field notes, other than the letters. The 14
‘Gensan’ skins from 27 April are all labelled in pencil by
one hand on one paper stock. Although this labelling
style continues in ‘Gensan’ skins collected subsequent to
30 April, many other specimens are clearly labelled by at
least one other hand using brown ink. A plausible
explanation is that someone was collecting at Wonsan in
anticipation of the Australians’ arrival; the letters indicate
that they intended to make a stop at Wonsan and take
another boat to Vladivostok. It seems likely that they had
contacted a resident naturalist there, who secured birds
in expectation of their arrival. In Trebilcock’s second
letter written aboard ship en route for Vladivostok, he
mentioned that his fellow European passengers were all
‘more or less naturalists’ and in his third he mentions
several expatriate residents of Wonsan: customs officials
Messrs Bowie and Wakefield; a missionary, Mr Foote;
Mr and Mrs Mannheimer, and Mr Billonough, an English
resident. For the ten specimens with locality simply given
as ‘Corea’, the labelling style differs from the
aforementioned specimens but there seems no way to
Table 2. Birds collected in Korea away from Wonsan by Hall or his associates.
1 See species text
2 Listed by Austin ( 1 948) and, following him, Tomek (2002) for South Hamgyong province (= Wonsan; see above), but this locality is not defensible.
Austin’s error is immaterial for the wagtail and bunting, both of which are otherwise known from Wonsan, but significant for the lark.
3 From ranges in Dickinson (2003) more likely to be G. c. coreensis.
132
PR. SWEET et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
identify the locality or collector. Of these specimens, only
the Crested Larks are critical (see below).
Trebilcock’s letters show that the two men collected the
birds themselves, Trebilcockhimselfbeingnewto shooting;
there is no indication in the letters that they purchased any
of them from markets, and they clearly saw the birds when
fresh because bare part colours, including iris, are noted.
Every day they covered the rugged hinterland of Wonsan
energetically (evidently somewhat too energetically for
Trebilcock’s taste), so the locality ‘Wonsan’ should be
understood to cover quite a large area. For example, one
day they walked to a river 10 miles distant, and another
they ascended ‘the river that empties itself near Gensan. . .far
back into the ranges’. Trebilcock gave a total of 224 birds
secured; the difference between this and the 212 given by
Rothschild probably reflects loss through damage or simply
the original poor preparation of the specimens (as noted
by Hartert and Hall 1904). Specimens of ‘Korean blue
jay’ and ‘starling’ mentioned in Trebilcock’s letters were
presumably in the 12 skins lost.
The birds collected at Wonsan are listed in Table 1,
using the species taxonomy and nomenclature of Inskipp
et al. (1996). Subspecies are as givenron the Rothschild
labels which were attached to the specimens after their
arrival at Tring, or as written in the AMNH catalogue.
Also indicated are, for the species Hall collected, other
records from Wonsan. As one of the country’s main east-
sea ports, Wonsan has been, by DPRK standards, well
covered. Bird data were collected there on the following
trips: 15-18 August 1880 (Giglioli and Salvadori 1887);
1 883 and 1 886 (Clark 1910); spring 1 886 and November
1 887-February 1888 (Taczanowski 1887, 1888);
September-October 1897 (Yankovskii 1898 in Tomek
1999, 2002); 19 June 1900 (Tomek 1999: 79-80); 18
July 1901 (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.); April-May
1917 (Kuroda 1918); unspecified date(s) in or shortly
before 1933 (Cumming 1933: 41); summer 1936
(Yamashina in Austin 1948: 17);May 1960 (Tomek 1999:
41); May 1970 (Tomek 1999: 21); 10 October 1978
(Bochenski et al. 1981); 7 August 1979 (Tomek and
Dontchev 1987); 19 and 23-24 May 1 980 (Mauersberger
1981); 10, 14 June 1980 (Tomek 1984); October 1980
(Grummt 1993); 17 and 20-23 August 1984 (Kolbe
1988) ; 19, 24 April and 2 May 1987 (Glowacinski et al.
1 989) ; 26 Sep-1 Oct 1 988 (H. Tauchnitz per J. Fiebig in
litt. 2003); 18-19 and 22 Nov 1989 (Stepanyan 1998);
repeatedly during 1987-1990 (Fiebig 1993, 1995); and
October 1991 (Tomek 1999: 5, 25). In spite of this activity,
there are no other published Wonsan records for over a
third of the species (21 of 58) that Hall collected there.
Austin (1948) listed less than a quarter of Hall’s
collection (Table 1) but, even so, sowed some confusion.
Some specimens labelled merely as ‘Corea’ were listed for
Wonsan (Table 2, note 2), and in Austin’s (1948) map,
Wonsan lay in Hamgyong Namdo (= Hamgyong South)
province. Because he localised records only to province,
Tomek (1999, 2002) likewise listed all these records also
for Hamgyong South. However, following province
boundary realignment, Wonsan has lain in Kangwon
province for many years; hence the records should have
been reassigned. The same holds for these authors’
assignment to province of P. Jouy’s few records from
Wonsan (Clark 1910).
Species are discussed below only where they are
significant as individual records at species or subspecies
level, either through paucity of previous DPRK records
in total, or from the east coast, at the appropriate season.
Common Goldeneye Bucephala dangula
The date of 1 1 May is much later in spring than any
record traced byTomek (1999) outside the northernmost
provinces, but is echoed by a recent sighting on the
Taedong river in Pyongyang of five birds on 1 9 May 2002
(JWD own data).
Common Merganser Mergus merganser
This specimen (AMNH 734284), a male in nuptial
plumage, is undated but labelled as being from Gensan.
Trebilcock’s letter of 16 May noted: ‘Wed May 13th.
Another twenty mile tramp today... and all for only one
species that was new to us — a diver with very bright red
legs and feet. Today we ended our Corean shooting’.
This cannot refer to any specimen but the merganser,
probably left undated because of the rush to pack and
post the skins before leaving for Russia (Trebilcock’s letters
make clear a level of uncertainty about precise dates,
stemming no doubt from Hall’s punishing schedule which
meant that Trebilcock had no time to write any Korean
letters until he boarded the ship) . This date is significantly
later in spring than any DPRK record listed by Tomek
(1999) or any Korean record in Austin (1948). More
recently. Park Jin-Young (2002) listed a single on 1 May
1993 from southern Korea, and it is now known to breed
there (Duckworth and Moores in prep.). There are
previous records from only one east-coast province of
DPRK, North Hamgyong (Tomek 1999).
White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos
This is the only forest specialist in Hall’s birds. Its
presence is doubly surprising given the absence of Great
Spotted Woodpecker D. major , which is common in the
sort of deforested habitats with scattered trees occupied
by the majority of Hall’s land-birds (Tomek 1999, JWD
own data). That there are seven skins is even more
remarkable.
WHIMBREL Numenius phaeopus
Although Whimbrel is common in DPRK, only two of
the several dozen records traced byTomek (1999) were
on the east coast. That Hall collected eight specimens,
that S. Bergman also found the species on this coast, near
Chuul in the 1 930s (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.), and
that it is common on the east coast of southern Korea (N.
Moores in litt. 2006) all suggest it has been under-recorded
on DPRK’s east coast.
Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus
Birds on 2 May (one) and 9 May (two) are noteworthy,
because Tomek (1999) traced no May records. This
species’s seasonality in DPRK remains unclear, and there
are few recent records. This may reflect under-recording,
because in southern Korea it is a widespread breeder
along rivers (Moores in press).
Greater Sand Plover Charadrius leschenaultii
Hall’s two birds on 10 May 1903 are the first for Korea
(see Austin 1948), the only subsequent record from DPRK
being from near the west coast on 1 9 April 1958 (Tomek
1999). In southern Korea it was traditionally considered
a vagrant (Won Pyong-Oh 1996) but is better classed as
Forktail 23 (2007)
The Hall collection of birds from Wonsan, central Korea
133
‘a rare or uncommon migrant’ (Park Jin-Young 2002),
and the same may be found to hold for DPRK.
COMMON Tern Sterna hirundo
Tomek (1999) traced only one spring record of Common
Tern from DPRK, from May 1927 on the west coast.
However, it may have been simply overlooked at this
season; there are recent records of terns presumably this
species from the west coast on 10 April 1999 and
Pyongyang on 3 May 2002 (JWD own data), there are
overlooked historical records from the east coast near the
Russian border in spring 1935 (Duckworth and Frisk in
prep.), and it is widespread in southern Korea in spring
(N. Moores in litt. 2006).
Black Kite Milvus migrans
Black Kite is now exceedingly scarce in DPRK
(Duckworth and Moores in prep.), and Hall’s specimen
is further evidence (adding to the records in Tomek 1 999)
that it was formerly more common.
Little Heron Butorides striatus
Although now a common bird in DPRK, Tomek (1999)
traced only two records from before 1 950; in addition, S.
Bergman collected three in 1935 (Duckworth and Frisk
in prep.). Whether it was genuinely rare or was simply
overlooked is difficult to say. Trebilcock’s letter stated
this was the only individual of the species that they saw.
Grey-backed Thrush Turdus hortulorum
Although presently a common breeding species and
passage migrant in inland west-central Korea (JWD own
data), and widely recorded from the western half of the
country, Tomek (2002) traced no other DPRK records
from the east coast.
Willow Tit Pams montanus
The single black-capped tit in the collection, AMNH 682357
from 8 May, was referred by Vaurie and Snow (1957) to
Willow Tit, evidently after critical comparison by Charles
Vaurie who concluded it showed no differences from Willow
Tits from Ussuria and lower Amurland. A Willow Tit of
this date and locality would be a highly significant DPRK
record compared with the records assembled by Tomek
(2002; who made no mention of this record), whereas the
closely similar-looking Marsh Tit P. palustris is already
known from Wonsan (Tomek 2002). Hence, AMNH
682357 was compared with north-east Asian holdings of
the two species at the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet,
Stockholm, and L. Svensson determined it as certainly a
Willow Tit. There seem to be only two other Korean Willow
Tits specimens outside DPRK (where Tomek traced well
over 1 00), both from southern Korea: one from 1 0 October
1926 and held in the Yamashina collection (Austin 1948)
and one from 1 1 October 1 982, housed at the south Korean
national arboretum (Park Jin-Young 2002).
This Willow Tit record is outside the pattern
established by Tomek (2002) for the species in northern
Korea: a fairly widespread and at least locally common
breeder in the northern highlands, with winter records
over a wider area. Its presence in the central Korean coastal
strip, during the breeding season, may reflect an extremely
late departure from a long-distance movement the
previous autumn. East Asian Willow Tits make irregular
autumn eruptions and the (smaller) return movements
may run into May (Harrap and Quinn 1996), although
after one such irruption into the Pyongyang area in autumn
2002, all birds disappeared from four separate sites within
a fortnight of each other, in late March 2003 (JWD own
data). It certainly should not be assumed that Willow Tits
would be present in Wonsan in a typical May.
Crested Lark Galerida cristata
Austin (1948) and after him, Tomek (2002), listed Hall’s
two Korean skins (AMNH 557841 and AMNH 557842)
for South Hamgyong province (= Wonsan; see above),
one of only three records for the three east-coast provinces
of DPRK. In fact, the locality is unknown (Table 2), and
Wonsan (and South Hamgyong province) should be
deleted from this species’s recorded range. The other two
east coast records, from unspecified localities in North
Hamgyong province in 1917 and with no date, cannot be
assumed to come from within the modern province’s
boundaries, because large sectors of its historical area now
fall in the new Ryanggang province. These sectors include
the Paekdu area and surroundings which were a lure to the
early collectors, where Crested Lark was observed in 1 9 7 8
by Bochenski et al. (1981). Hence, there is no Crested
Lark record certainly from the eastern provinces of DPRK.
Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
As well as six Grey Wagtail specimens taken between 1
and 5 May, Trebilcock’s third letter noted that on 9 May
he ‘found the nest of the yellow-breasted wagtail’, an
‘open saucer shaped nest of grass in a crevice between
some granite boulders picturesquely situated between
two miniature waterfalls’ with ‘five pale greenish eggs
lightly spotted with a very pale brown’. This must refer to
Grey Wagtail; the only other ‘yellow-breasted wagtail’
occurring regularly in Korea, Yellow Wagtail AL flava , is
only a migrant (Tomek 2002). Austin (1948) considered
Grey Wagtail to be only ‘a common spring and autumn
transient... doubtfully a summer resident in the north’,
despite several previous references to its status as a Korean
breeder which he cited. This was part of a pattern of his
rejection of others’ testimony when it did not fit his
personal notions (Duckworth and Moores in prep.).
Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus
Tomek (2002) listed only eight records from DPRK, but
the species has surely been overlooked as it was found
commonly in inland west-central Korea during 2000-
2003 (Duckworth 2006); Hall’s specimens provide further
support for this.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Krister Mild for determining the Alauda specimens, Lars
Svensson for examining the Willow Tit, the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet,
Stockholm (especially Goran Frisk) for receiving these specimens on
loan from AMNH, Nial Moores and Km Su Kyung for discussing the
current status of some of these species in southern Korea, Jurgen Fiebig
for discussion and for providing H. Tauchnitz’s unpublished records,
Teresa Tomek for commenting on a draft of the text, Kim Jong Ok and
Ri Song II for information about Won Hong Koo, Sarah Yeates for
obtaining some important references, Ben Sylvan of the Australian
Manuscripts Collection, State Library of Victoria, for providing copies
of Trebilcock’s letters, Meg Trebilcock for permission to examine the
letters, and Lizzie Frances for transcribing them.
134
P. R. SWEET et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
REFERENCES
Austin, O. L., Jr. (1948) The birds of Korea. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.,
Harvard University 101: 1-301.
Baldi, A. and Waliczky, Z. (1 992) Zoological collectings by the Hungarian
Natural History Museum in Korea. 108. A report on the collecting
of the fifteenth expedition. Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica 7: 117-
119.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Bochenski, Z., Oles T. andTomek, T. (1981) Materials for the avifauna
of People’s Democratic Republic of Korea. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia
25: 13-32.
Clark, A. H. (1910) Report on a collection of birds made by Pierre Louis
Jouy in Korea. Proc. United States Nat. Mus. 38: 147-176.
Collar, N. J. & Rudyanto (2003) . The archive and the ark: bird specimen
data in conservation status assessment. Pp. 95-1 1 3 in N. J. Collar,
C. T. Fisher and C. J. Feare, eds. Why museums matter: avian
archives in an age of extinction. Bull. Brit. Om. Club Suppl. 123A.
Csorba, G. and Demeter, A. ( 1 989) Zoological collectings by the Hungarian
Natural History Museum in Korea. 90. A report on the collecting of
the tenth expedition. Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica 5: 95-97.
Cumming, D. J. (1933) Notes on Korean birds: with a description of one
hundred of more common ones. Transactions of the Korea Branch of
the Royal Asiatic Society 22: 1-94.
Dickinson, E. C., ed. (2003). The Howard & Moore complete checklist of
the birds of the ivorld. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Duckworth, J. W. (2006) Records of some bird species hitherto rarely
found in DPR Korea. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 126: 252-290.
Duckworth, J. W. and Frisk, G. (in prep.) The Bergman bird collection
from northern and central Korea, 1935-1936.
Duckworth, J. W. and Moores, N. (in prep.) A re-evaluation of the pre-
1948 Korean breeding avifauna: correcting a ‘founder effect’ in
perceptions.
Fiebig, J. (1993) Dreijahrige omithologische Studien in Nordkorea. I.
Allgemeiner Teil und Non-Passeriformes. Mitteilungen aus dem
Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 69, Supplement: Annalen fur Omithologie
17: 93-146.
Fiebig, J. (1995) Dreijahrige omithologische Studien in Nordkorea.
Nachtrage zum I. Teil (Non-Passeres) und II. Teil Passeriformes.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 71, Supplement:
Annalen fur Omithologie 19: 43-99.
Giglioli, H. H. and Salvador!, T. (1887) Brief notes on the fauna of
Corea and the adjoining coast of Manchuria. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.
1887: 580-596.
Glowacinski, Z., Jakubiec, Z. and Profus, P. (1989) Materials for the
avifauna of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Results of
the spring expedition ’87. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 32: 439-494.
Grummt, W. (1993) Bemerkungen zum Vorkommen der Japanstelze
( Motacilla grandis Sharpe) in Norden Koreas. Beitrage zur Vogelkunde
39: 377-378.
Hall, R. (1904) Through Siberia. Victorian Geographical Journal No.
XIII, Part I, Vol. XXII: 25-27.
Hall, R. (1919) The Eastern Palaearctic and Australia. Emu 19: 82-98.
Harrap, S. and Quinn, D. (1996) Tits, nuthatches and treecreepers. London:
Christopher Helm.
Hartert, E. and Hall, R. (1904) On the birds collected by Mr. Robert
Hall, of Melbourne, on the banks of the Lena river between Gigalowa
and its mouth. Ibis (8)4: 415-446.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Kloot, T. (1986) An Australian in Siberia, 1903. R. E. Trebilcock
(1880-1976). La Trobe Library Journal No. 38; 10: 35-39.
Kolbe, H. (1988) Spatsommerliche Notizen zur nordkoreanische
Vogelfauna. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 64,
Supplement: Annalen fur Omithologie 12: 51-66.
Kuroda, N. ( 1 9 1 8) Notes on Corean and Manchurian birds. Annotationes
Zoologicae Japonensis 9(4): 495-573.
Mauersberger, G. (1981) Anmerkungen zur Avifauna Nordkoreas.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 57, Supplement:
Annalen fur Omithologie 5: 15-62.
Moores, N. (2006) South Korea’s shorebirds: a review of abundance,
distribution, threats and conservation status. Stilt 50: 62-72.
Neff, D. J. (1956) Birds of Yang-do, Korea. Auk 73: 551-555.
Park Jin-Y oung (2002) Current status and distribution of birds in Korea.
Unpublished thesis, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University,
Seoul. (In Korean with English abstract.)
Rasmussen, P. C. and Prys-Jones, R. P. (2003) History vs mystery: the
reliability of museum specimen data. Pp. 66-94 in N. J. Collar,
C. T. Fisher and C. J. Feare, eds. Why museums matter: avian
archives in an age of extinction. Bull. Brit. Om. Club Suppl. 123A.
Robin, L. (2001) The flight of the Emu: one hundred years of Australian
ornithology 1 901-2001 . Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
Sharland, M. (1949) Obituaries. Robert Hall. Emu 49: 144-145.
Sharland, M. (1978) Memories of Robert Hall. The Australian Bird Watcher
7: 222-229.
Stepanyan, L. S. (1998) Materials to the ornithological fauna of the
Korean peninsula. Ortnithologia 28: 114-119. (In Russian with
English summary and title.)
T aczanowski, L. ( 1 887) Liste des oiseaux recueillis en Coree par M. Jean
Kalinowski. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1887: 596-611.
Taczanowski, L. (1888) Liste supplemental des oiseaux recueillis en
Coree par M. Jean Kalinowski. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1888: 450-
468.
Tomek, T. (1984) Materials to the breeding avifauna of the People’s
Democratic Republic of Korea. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 27:
19-46.
Tomek, T. (1999) The birds of North Korea. Non-Passeriformes. Aha
Zoologica Cracoviensia 42: 1-217.
Tomek, T. (2002) The birds ofNorth Korea. Passeriformes. ActaZoologica
Cracoviensia 45: 1-235.
Tomek, T. and Dontchev, S. (1987) Materials concerning the avifauna
of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in the postbreeding
season. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 30: 37-52.
Vaurie, C. and Snow, D. (1957) Systematic notes on Palaearctic birds
no. 27. Paridae: the genera Pams and Sylviparus.Amer. Mus. Novitates
1852: 1-43.
WonHongKoo (1963-1965) [The birds of Korea], Vols 1-3. Pyongyang:
Science Institute Publishing House. (In Korean; not seen; cited in
various sources.)
Won Pyong-Oh (1996) Checklist of the birds of Korea. Bulletin of Korea
Institu te of Ornithology 5: 39-58.
P. R. Sweet and T. J. Trombone, Department of Ornithology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural
History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 1 0024, U.S.A. Emails: sweet@amnh. organd trombone@amnh. org
J. W. Duckworth, Wildlife Conservation Society, Pyongyang, DPR Korea; present address: East Redham Farm, Bank Road,
Pilning, Bristol BS35 4JG, U.K. Email: boonhom@ocellata.com
L. Robin, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia and Centre for
Historical Research, National Museum of Australia, Canberra, Australia. Email: libby.robin@anu.edu.au
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 135-144
New records of birds from the Maldives
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Fifteen species of bird were recorded from the Maldives for the first time, mainly during 2001-2007: Indian Swiftlet Collocalia unicolor ,
Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus, Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola. Parasitic Jaeger Stercorarius parasiticus , Long-tailed Jaeger
Stercorarius longicaudus , Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus, Black Kite Milvus migrans, Red-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda,
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis, Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris, Band-rumped Storm-petrel Oceanodroma castro.
Ashy Woodswallow Artamus fuscus. Large Cuckooshrike Coracina macei , Rosy Starling Stumus roseus and Citrine Wagtail Motacilla
citreola. This raises the total number of birds known from the islands to 182. These appear to be the first records of both Long-tailed Jaeger
and Band-rumped Storm-petrel for the South Asian region.
INTRODUCTION
The Republic of Maldives lies in the tropical Indian Ocean,
to the south-west of India and Sri Lanka. The country is
composed entirely of atoll reefs, with the only land being
small, vegetated sandbanks. There are some 1 ,200 islands
in all; the area of the largest island is only 5 km2, and the
total land area is estimated to be less than 300 km2,
distributed over a total atoll area of some 21,400 km2.
The climate is tropical, but moderated by the ocean, with
average temperatures varying little beyond 26-3 1 °C. The
country is affected by the monsoons, with the stronger
and wetter south-west monsoon blowing from April to
October and the north-east monsoon predominating from
December to March.
The birds of the Maldives have not been particularly
well studied. The only major reports are those of Phillips
and Sims (1958), Phillips (1963), Strickland and Jenner
(1978) and Ash and Shafeeg (1994). The last authors
reviewed records for a total of 1 50 species of bird from the
Maldives. Subsequently, Anderson and Baldock (2001)
provided records of 12 new species and five published
records that were not included in the review of Ash and
Shafeeg (1994). That raised the total number of species
known from the Maldives to 167.
The aim of this paper is to document 1 5 additional
records for the Maldives, two of which also appear to be
first records for the South Asian region. Some information
about other bird species occurring in the Maldives is also
presented.
METHODS
All observations are by RCA, except where credited
otherwise. I have been resident in the Maldives since
1983; most observations reported here were made since
the submission of the paper by Anderson and Baldock
(200 1 ) and thus cover the period early 200 1 to early 2007.
Observations by others include those kindly provided by
the following visitors to the Maldives: M. J. and J. P.
Pointon (visited North Male, Meerufenfushi, 5-17
November 1996); J. Jansen (North Male, Lohifushi,
6-20 January 1999); S. Rowland (South Male, Fihalohi,
28 January to 1 1 February 2002). Observations by other
observers were made on field trips with RCA.
Records from the Royal Naval Bird Watching Society
(RNBWS) are published in their annual journal Sea
Swallow. A database of these records has been compiled
by S. Howe, who has added previously unpublished dates
and positions for many records from the original reporting
forms. A copy of database records for the Maldives area
was kindly provided by W. R. P. Bourne (in litt. 21 July
2001).
Records from the 1950s by W. W. A. Phillips (Phillips
and Sims 1958, Phillips 1963) form the core of our current
understanding of birds in the Maldives. However, some
questions have arisen over some of his records, for example
as a result of subsequent splitting of some species. Phillips’s
unpublished Maldives notebooks were generously given
to me by his daughter, Mrs E. Wynell-Mayow. They
provide a number of useful insights into his records that
did not find their way into his published papers.
A particular issue in the Maldives is the keeping of
wild-caught pet birds, which may be wing-clipped and
allowed to run freely (Ash and Shafeeg 1994, Anderson
and Baldock 2001). Some of the birds are caught locally,
but others are imported. Many apparently significant
records for the Maldives turn out on further investigation
to be imported birds. Records of pet birds are included
here where the author is satisfied that the birds originated
in the Maldives; if there is uncertainty this is indicated.
Species marked with an asterisk (*) are first records
for the Maldives. A map of the Maldives is provided in
Fig. 1. Since several disjunct islands may share the same
name it is common practice to prefix island names with
the abbreviation of the atoll in which they are located.
Thus, the island of Hithadhoo in Seenu Atoll may be
written as S. Hithadhoo, to differentiate it from say
Hithadhoo in Laamu Atoll, which would be written as L.
Hithadhoo. The standard atoll abbreviations used are
given on the map. Further information on atoll names is
provided by Ash and Shafeeg (1994).
OBSERVATIONS
Northern Pintail Anas acuta
Four drakes and seven females seen on the saltwater lake
(Eidigali Kili) at the north end of S. Hithadhoo on 20
February 2002. Three males and five females at the same
location on 23 February 2002. A captive female at H.Dh.
Kulhudhufushi in November 2000, reported to have been
caught on the island. An uncommon northern winter
visitor, not previously recorded in February, nor from
Haa Dhaalu Atoll (Ash and Shafeeg 1994).
GARGANEY Anas querquedula
Twelve birds were present on 20 February 2002 on the
saltwater lake at the north end of S. Hithadhoo. Five
136
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Forktail 23 (2007)
Figure 1 . Map of the Maldives showing main atolls and their standard
abbreviations.
captive birds were seen in three separate households at
H.Dh. Kulhudhufushi in May 2002: a male reported to
have been caught with a female (which had died) at H.A.
Baarah some time previously (probably between
November 2000 and April 2001); two males caught on
the island in September 2001; a male and female bought
from another household on the island, original provenance
unknown. One wild female or eclipse male on the saltwater
lake at H.Dh. Kulhudhufushi on 18 October 2002. A
regular winter visitor not previously recorded in February,
nor from the far north of the Maldives (Ash and Shafeeg
1994, Anderson and Baldock 2001).
Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus
Six birds were seen on 5 November 1996 at K.
Meerufenfushi by M. J. and J. P. Pointon; one or more of
what were presumed to be the same birds were heard but
not seen on 8 November 1996 (M. J. Pointon in lixt.
2002). This is only the second record for the Maldives
(Ash and Shafeeg 1994).
* INDIAN SWIFTLET Collocalia unicolor
One individual was seen on 10 February 2004 at sea off
south-east Faafu Atoll (at 3°09'N 73°07'E) by RCA and
G. Tucker. It was a small swift, with a distinctly fluttering
flight interspersed with short glides. Its tail was relatively
short and only slightly forked, and it appeared uniformly
medium brown above with no trace of any pale on the
rump. This last feature distinguished it from Himalayan
Swiftlet Collocalia brevirostris (Ali and Ripley 1987,
Chantler and Driessens 1995, Grimmett et al. 1998,
Rasmussen and Anderton 2005). This is the first record
of this species from the Maldives. A small flock of 5-6
swiftlets was seen from a moderate distance hawking over
palm trees on K. Guraidhoo on 18 February 2004 by
RCA. They are believed to have been either Indian or
Himalayan Swiftlet but were not seen clearly enough to
enable identification to species. Himalayan Swiftlet has
been recorded from Maldives before, with four previous
records in November to January (Phillips and Sims 1958,
Phillips 1963, Strickland and Jenner 1978). However,
Chantler and Driessens (1995) and Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005) consider Maldivian records of
Himalayan Swiftlet to more likely have been Indian
Swiftlet. Regarding the first of those records (Phillips and
Sims 1958), W.W.A. Phillips wrote in his unpublished
field notes (author’s collection): ‘ Collocalia brevirostris...
It flew low and was identified with certainty, with the aid
of field glasses at 30/40 yards range.’ However, in the
1 950s these two species werevwidely regarded as races of
a single species, so the early records from the Maldives do
deserve critical review. Rasmussen and Anderton (2005)
place both species in the genus Aerodramus.
White-throated Needletail Himndapus caudacutus
One individual was seen 12-16 November 1996 at
K. Meerufenfushi by M.J. and J. P. Pointon (M. J. Pointon
in litt. 2002). This is only the second record for the
Maldives (Strickland and Jenner 1978, Ash and Shafeeg
1994).
Pallid Swift Apus pallidus
One individual was seen at close range and identified
with confidence on 7 January 1999 at K. Lohifushi by
J. Jansen [in litt. 2002) ' This is only the third record for
the Maldives (Strickland and Jenner 1978, Ash and
Shafeeg 1994).
House Swift Apus affinis
One individual was seen at close range and identified as
Apus affinis galilejensis on 7 January 1999 at Iv. Lohifushi
by J. Jansen (in litt. 2002). This species is an
uncommon winter visitor to the Maldives (Ash and
Shafeeg 1994).
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa
One captive individual was photographed on B.
Thulaadhoo in May 2001. It had been captured on the
island during the previous August-October. This appears
to be only the second record with details of this species
from the Maldives. The first definite record is of a bird
Forktail 23 (2007)
New records of birds from the Maldives
137
captured in Male in 1980 and photographed by Ahmed
Shafeeg (Ash and [Ali] Shafeeg 1994). Ali and Ripley
(1969) had previously recorded this species as a vagrant
to the Maldives, but without providing any details. It is
not clear where Ah and Ripley (1969) obtained this
information, although Ahmed Shafeeg informed me
(verbally, May 2002) that he corresponded with Salim Ali
in the 1 960s, providing him with information on Maldivian
birds, although he could not remember specific details.
*Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus
A single bird was clearly observed at close range at S. Gan
on 24 February 2002. Since this species is a widespread
winter visitor throughout India and Sri Lanka, and has
been recorded from Lakshadweep (Kurup and Zacharias
1994), it might not be as rare in the Maldives as this single
record suggests.
SANDERLING Calidris alba
A single bird in non-breeding plumage was seen on the
airfield at S. Gan on 9 September 2001. One individual
was seen on V. Anbara on 9 February 2004. Two were
seen on V. Anbara on 20 February 2004. This uncommon
winter visitor has not previously been recorded earlier
than October nor from Vaavu Atoll (Anderson and
Baldock 2001).
EURASIAN Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus
A ‘few’ individuals were seen in January 1999 on K.
Lohifiushi by J. Jansen (i nlitt. 2002). A captive individual
in non-breeding plumage was photographed by RCA on
B. Thulaadhoo in May 200 1 . It had been captured on the
island during the previous August-October. There has
been only one previous record of this species from the
Maldives (Ash and Shafeeg 1994).
■^Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola
An immature was observed at close range on the airfield
at S. Gan on 8 and 9 September 2001. It was positively
identified to this species: the distinct white trailing edges
to the secondaries were clearly seen on several occasions.
Furthermore, the long tail was very deeply forked. Other
features included white rump, vent and belly; rufous
axillaries and underwing-coverts; and a pale throat-patch
lacking a black border.
This appears to be the first record of this species from
the Maldives. There have been previous reports of
Collared Pratincole from the Maldives: both Phillips
(1963) and Strickland and Jenner (1978) recorded it from
Addu Atoll. However, Oriental Pratincole G. maldivarum
was generally regarded as a subspecies of Collared
Pratincole at that time. Indeed, in his unpublished
Maldives papers, Phillips does refer his sightings to
G. pratincola maldivarum. As late as 1987, Ali and Ripley
reported the two as subspecies of Collared Pratincole.
However, Hayman et al. (1986) referred Maldivian
pratincoles to Oriental Pratincole in their distribution
maps. Similarly, Ash and Shafeeg (1994) included all
previous pratincole records from the Maldives under
Oriental Pratincole, and omitted Collared Pratincole from
their checklist. However, both these species of pratincole
have now been positively identified from the Maldives
(see below). While it is likely that most previous records
of pratincole in the Maldives were of Oriental, this record
of Collared does places the specific identity of some
previous records in doubt. One additional record of
interest is that of P. W. G. Chilman who recorded three
adults and one juvenile (as Collared Pratincole) at 07°32'N
75°42'E, i.e. 1 18 nautical miles west-south-west of the
southern tip of India on 7 September 1979 (Casement
1983 and RNBWS records).
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
1. A single individual was seen on K. Lohifushi on
9 January 1999 by J. Jansen {in litt. 2002).
2. A single captive bird (a locally caught adult) was seen
on B. Thulaadhoo on 21 May 2001. Although the
primaries of this bird had been clipped, the secondaries
of both wings were intact and definitely lacked white
trailing edges.
3. A single juvenile was seen on the airfield at H.Dh.
Hanimaadhoo on 1 0 November 2003. It was initially
identified as a Collared Pratincole on account of the
white border to the secondaries. However, this border
was very narrow, much narrower than that seen on
Collared Pratincole, and is a feature of juvenile Oriental
Pratincoles (Hayman et al. 1986).
As noted above, all previous pratincole records were
placed under Oriental Pratincole by Ash and Shafeeg
(1994). Ali and Ripley (1987) state that Abularge is the
Maldivian name for this species. Although they gave no
source for this name, they appear to have obtained it
from W.W.A. Phillips; in his unpublished Maldives
papers Phillips mentioned Abulargee (sic) as a possible
name for pratincoles from Addu (=Seenu) Atoll, but it
is omitted from his printed paper (Phillips 1963). The
name Abulagee is indeed a name from Addu Atoll for a
bird that fits the description of a pratincole (N. Mohamed,
National Centre for Linguistic and Historical Research,
verbally March 2007). An alternative name, Alamaalu-
guraa, was given by Ash and Ah Shafeeg ( 1 994), following
Ahmed Shafeeg, but appears to be incorrect. Ahmed
Shafeeg (verbally May 2002) noted that he recorded this
name only once and was not sure of it appropriateness.
The name Alamaalu-guraa normally applies to an insect
found in taro flowers (Naseema Mohamed, National
Centre for Linguistic and Historical Research, verbally
March 2007).
BROWN Skua Catharacta antarctica
1 . One captive bird was photographed on V. Felidhoo
on 2 June 2001; it was reported to have been caught
by fishermen of the atoll.
2. One individual was seen by RCA, D. Barber and
M. Scott-Ham off Lhaviyani Atoll (at 5°32'N73°36'E)
on 6 November 2003.
3. Another individual was seen and photographed by
RCA, G. Tucker and C. Weir off Vaavu Atoll (at
3°3LN 73°45'E) on 20 April 2006.
All three birds were separated from South Polar Skua
C. maccormicki by their warm dark brown coloration
(without any trace of colder, greyer tones). There are
approximately 12 previous records of Catharacta skuas,
not all specifically identified, and mostly of captive birds
(Ash and Shafeeg 1994, Anderson and Baldock 2001).
These new records appear to be the first of wild Brown
Skua with dates, and they support the contention that
this species is a southern winter visitor to the central
Indian Ocean (Olsen and Larsson 1997, Rasmussen and
Anderton 2005; also Morzer Bruyns and Voous 1965).
138
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Forktail 23 (2007)
*PARASITIC JAEGER Stercorarius parasiticus
There are three positive records:
1. One individual seen at close range (to <50 m) off
North Male Atoll (at 4°22'N 7 3°4 1 'E) on 29 February
2004. It appeared to be an intermediate/dark phase
bird, mostly warm chocolate brown with white primary
upper wing flashes, cream nape and sides of neck, and
distinct pointed tail projection.
2 . One individual seen at moderate distance (about c. 500
m) off Vaavu Atoll (at about 3°18'N 73°36'E) on 18
March 2004. It showed a pale nape and belly, and was
only slightly larger than the Brown Noddies Anous
stolidus it was harrying.
3. One individual seen at close range (to c.50 m) off
Vaavu Atoll (at 3°18'N 73°40'E) on 1 5 April 2005. It
was a pale morph adult, without breast-band, with a
distinct pointed tail projection. It was seen harassing
an Audubon’s Shearwater Pujfinus Iherminieri and a
Brown Noddy.
In addition, there are four sightings of five individuals,
which were identified as this species when seen, but the
possibility of confusion with other jaeger species cannot
be entirely discounted:
4 . One juvenile seen off Haa Alifu Atoll (at approximately
7°10'N 72°40'E) on 9 April 1998.
5. One individual seen in the One-and-a-half Degree
Channel (at about 1 ° 1 8'N 73° 1 9'E) on 28 March 200 1 .
6. Two individuals seen by J. Young and M. Baldock off
Lh. Naifaru (at about 5°25'N 73°20'E) on 19 April
2001.
7. One individual seen off V. Fotheyo (at3°32'N 73°44'E)
on 4 April 2003. It was harrying Brown Noddies in a
feeding flock associated with a school of tuna.
These are apparently the first records for the Maldives.
Harrison (1985: map 200) included the Maldives within
the boreal winter range of this species in the Indian Ocean,
although that does not appear to have been based on actual
records. However, this species has been widely recorded
from the eastern Arabian Sea (Prasad 2004) including
Lakshadweep (Daniels 1992) and also Seychelles (Skerrett
et al. 2001). It is likely that this species is under-recorded
in the region: at sea dark and intermediate morph
individuals can easily be confused with Brown Noddy
(pers. obs.), so much so that I believe I must undoubtedly
have overlooked this species on occasion. More generally,
this may be an example of ‘aggressive mimicry’, providing
a selective advantage to dark phase birds on their winter
feeding grounds and contributing to the maintenance of
polymorphism in this species.
*LONG-TAILED JAEGER Stercorarius longicaudus
1. One individual was clearly seen (and poorly
photographed) at moderate range (to about 100 m)
about 8 nautical miles (c. 1 5 km) off South Male Atoll
(at 3°48'N 7 3°36'E) on 1 6 April 2005 . It was an adult
in breeding plumage, with remarkably long tail
projection, and identification was not in doubt.
2. A second bird was observed (to <50 m) and
photographed in the Watteru Kandu (between Vaavu
and Meemu Atolls, at 3°12'N 73°38'E) on 21 April
2006 by RCA, G. Tucker, C. Weir and others. It
appeared to be a first-year bird, with cold grey head
and breast, plain dark brown upper wings with only
outer two primary shafts white (this feature clearly
seen in photographs), and a speckled mantle.
These appear to be the first definite records for the
Indian region. Although three were recorded off
Lakshadweep on 22 February 1987 by D. M. Simpson
(Bourne 1989), that record does not seem to have been
widely accepted: this species was not included by
Grimmett et al. (1998) nor by Prasad (2004), and it was
only regarded as possible in the region by Kazmierczak
and van Perlo (2000) and Rasmussen and Anderton
(2005). Olsen and Larsson (1997: 167) indicated that
this species migrates northwards across the western Indian
Ocean in April. However, that appeared to be based more
on the annual occurrence of birds on spring passage
through Eilat, Israel (Shirihai 1 996) than on actual records
in the Indian region.
HEUGLIN’S Gull Larus heuglini
I have five records of captive birds, all adults when
seen.
1 . A captive adult on Male in 1 990 reported to have been
caught in the Maldives some eight years earlier.
2. A captive adult seen on H.Dh. Kulhudhufushi in
February 1991, November 2000 and May 2002;
reported to have been caught near H.Dh.
Makunudhoo in about 1988.
3. A second captive adult on H.Dh. Kulhudhufushi in
May 2002; reported to have been caught on the island
about 5 years previously.
4. A captive adult on K. Meerufenfushi (Meeru Island
Resort) in 1994 and April 1998; what was probably
the same individual was seen in November 1996 by
M. J. andj. P. Pointon (Mike Pointon in litt. 1 5 October
2002); origins uncertain.
5 . A captive adult on K. Bodufmolhu (Fun Island Resort)
in March 2003 and March 2004; reported to have
been on the island since at least 2002 but origins
uncertain.
There have been only two previous records of gulls
referred to this species (Ash and Shafeeg 1 994, Anderson
and Baldock 2001). It is certainly not common in the
Maldives, but these records suggest that it is the
commonest of the large white-headed gulls to occur here,
as it is in some other parts of the region (Bourne 1996,
Buchheim 2006).
Yellow-legged Gull Larus cachinnans
1 . A captive adult was seen and photographed at H.Dh.
Kulhudhufushi in May 2002. Its legs were yellow and
its upperparts lighter grey than the captive Heuglin’s
Gull seen on same day. Its exact provenance was
uncertain: it was variously reported to have been caught
on the island or brought from Male where it had been
caught by local fishermen.
2. A captive adult reported from K. Meerufenfushi in
November 1996 by M. J. and J. P. Pointon (in litt.
2002). Also seen by RCA in April 1998.
There are only three previous records apparently of
this species from the Maldives, all based on photos of
captive adults taken by Ahmed Shafeeg (Ash and Shafeeg
1 994) . The taxonomy of these gulls remains problematic.
They seem to be best referred to Larus cachinnans
according Grimmett et al. (1998), Larus cachinnans
barabensis according to Olsen and Larssen (2004), Larus
(heuglini) barabensis according to Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005) and Larus barabensis according to
Buchheim (2006).
Forktail 23 (2007)
New records of birds from the Maldives
139
Brown-headed Gull Lams bmnnicephalus
A single captive individual in breeding plumage was
photographed at H.Dh. Kulhudhufushi in May and June
2002. The left primaries were cut, but the right primaries
had extensive black and small white mirrors. It was said
to have been caught by Maldivian tuna fisherman on a
local fish aggregating device, but precise details unknown .
There are only two previous records from the Maldives
(Ash and Shafeeg 1994).
Little Tern Sterna albifrons
There are five sightings which were identified to this species
with confidence. Several other sightings of small terns
that might have been of this species could not be
confidently separated from Saunders’s Tern Sterna
saundersi , which is relatively abundant in the Maldives.
1 . One was seen at relatively close range, perched on a
drifting buoy, off the east side of Lhaviyani Atoll (exact
position not noted) on 16 April 1998 by RCA and
R. Pitman.
2. Two groups were seen by RCA and I. Robinson on
27 March 2002, both just off the south-western side of
Raa Atoll. The first group of three birds was part of a
mixed flock of seabirds feeding over a tuna school at
about 5°20,N 7 2°5 1 'E, and the second group of about
25 birds was at about 5°32'N 72°47/E.
3. Four were seen offV. Fotheyo at about 3°22'N 73°45'E
on 12 April 2002.
4. At least one seen amongst c. 100 Saunders’s Terns at
Kalha Handi (islet) in Alifu Atoll on 1 1 March 2004
by RCA and C. Still.
5. Two single Little Terns were seen in Alifu Dhaalu
Atoll, one near Dhungethi on 24 February 2005 and
one the next day near Fushidhiggaa, by RCA and
M. Oliver.
There has been only one previously published record
of Little Tern in the Maldives: a single individual recorded
from Addu Atoll in November (Phillips 1963). The new
records presented here suggest that Little Tern is not so
rare in the Maldives, and may be a regular boreal winter
visitor, particularly to the northern atolls. The scarcity of
previous records is probably the result of confusion with
the more abundant Saunders’s Tern, combined with a
lack of ornithological study in the northern atolls. By way
of contrast, in the Chagos archipelago. Little Tern is
considered to be a moderately abundant resident, while
Saunders’s T ern is considered to be a vagrant (Carr 2005) .
White-winged Tern Chlidonias leucoptems
There are five new records, four from the north and centre
of the Maldives:
1. One non-breeding adult and one immature White¬
winged Tern observed at the airfield at S. Gan on 8
September 2001 .
2 . One non-breeding adult seen near K. Asdu on 30 March
2003.
3. One immature bird seen at K. Hulhumale on
4 November 2003 by RCA, D. Barber and M. Scott-
Ham.
4. One non-breeding adult seen outside Raa Atoll (at
about 5°30'N 72°45'E) on 13 November 2004.
5 . One adult in breeding plumage seen near M. Maduweri
on 21 April 2006, feeding over a shallow lagoon in the
company with two Black-naped Terns Sterna
sumatrana.
In addition two probable immatures were seen
separately just outside the west edge of Ari Atoll on 16
and 1 7 November 2004. This is a not-uncommon winter
visitor, but previously recorded only from the south of the
country.
White Tern Gygis alba
1. A single individual was seen at H.A. Medhafushi on
3 1 March 2002, in the company of Black-naped T erns,
by RCA, I. Robinson and H. Shaheem.
2. Another individual was seen at 5o00'N 73°28'E near
K. Kaashidhoo on 24 November 2006, in association
with a school of Fraser’s Dolphins Lagenodelphis hosei.
These are the first records of this species from the
northern Maldives. This species has long bred in Addu
Atoll in the far south of the Maldives. But its range does
appear to be spreading northward: it is reported to have
started breeding on G.Dh. Havodigalaa in 1 995, with the
population there now being perhaps as high as 100
individuals (M. Saleem in litt. 2006).
Lesser Noddy Anous tenuirostris
Anderson and Baldock (2001) noted thousands of Lesser
Noddies off the far north of the Maldives during the north¬
east monsoon season, at what appeared to be a major
feeding ground. Largely on the strength of that report,
Haa Alifu Atoll was listed as an Important Bird Area
(IBA) by BirdLife International (2004). During three
days of a cetacean survey (31 March to 2 April 2002) I
recorded an estimated 8,000+ Lesser Noddies off Haa
Alifu Atoll (although the possibility of confusion with
Black Noddy Anous minutus cannot be entirely
discounted). In comparison to previous visits (in April
1 998, February 1 999 and March 2000) there appeared to
be fewer birds and they were all off the north-east side of
the atoll, with none off the north-west side (where they
had been seen before). Lesser Noddy is an Indian Ocean
endemic, with breeding strongholds in Chagos (Symens
1999) and Seychelles (Skerrett et al. 2001). It does not
breed in the Maldives in any numbers. Indeed, there is
only a single previously reported case of breeding (Gadow
and Gardiner 1903). However, there have been some
recent and as yet unconfirmed reports of small numbers
breeding in Huvadhoo (GA plus GDh) Atoll.
OSPREY Pandion haliaetus
1 . One captive individual, photographed on V. Felidhoo
in early 2000, was reported to have been caught in
Haa Alifu Atoll in March 1999.
2. One captive individual, photographed on B.
Hithaadhoo in May 2001, was reported to have been
caught on B. Maduwari in April 2001.
3 . One wild individual was seen perched on the navigation
beacon near Lh. Aligaa on 24 April 2003; what was
presumed to be the same individual was seen again at
the same location the next day, where it was being
mobbed by a House Crow Corvus splendens.
4. One wild individual was seen on Lh. Kanifushi on
1 3 November 2003 by RCA, D. Barber and M. Scott-
Ham.
5. One captive individual was photographed on B.
Thulaadhoo on 2 February 2005 by S. Mohamed
Rasheed and Z. Waheed. It was reported to have been
caught on the same island about four months
previously, i.e. in about early October 2004.
140
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Forktail 23 (2007)
There have been only three previous records of Osprey
from the Maldives (Ash and Shafeeg 1 994) . Even though
the greatest level of ornithological recording has been in
the southern Maldives, six of the eight records to date
have been from the northern and central atolls, with only
two records from the south. This suggests that Osprey (in
common with several other northern winter migrants) is
more frequent in the north of the Maldives than the south.
This situation is not unexpected and was first noted by
S. Gardiner for other birds of prey (Gadow and Gardiner
1903). Osprey might be better classified as a regular, if
uncommon, northern winter visitor (at least to the
northern Maldives) rather than a vagrant as suggested by
Ash and Shafeeg (1994).
*Black-SHOULDERED Kite Elanus caeruleus
A captive adult was photographed on S . Gan on 5 October
2002. It had been purchased (for MRf 300, about
US$ 23) from G.Dh. Thinadhoo, where it was reported
to have been caught about one month previously; this was
subsequently confirmed by the catcher. A wild adult pair
of Black-shouldered Kites were seen and photographed
adjacent to the airfield on S. Gan op 1-3 August 2005.
These are the first records for the Maldives.
* Black Kite Milvus migrans
1 . One captured individual was photographed in Male
in June 1995; it was reported to have been caught in
Maldives during the preceding north-east monsoon.
2. A single Black Kite, apparently juvenile, was clearly
seen flying over S. Maradhoo on 20 February 2002. It
was being shadowed and mobbed by an extraordinary
flock of some 60+ White Terns Gygis alba.
3. An immature bird, apparently of subspecies M. m.
lineatus , was photographed on K. Hulhule on 28
November 2003 by K. Nye.
A captive adult seen in Baa Atoll in June 2001 was
originally reported to have been caught in the Maldives;
subsequent investigations revealed that it had been
imported from India.
Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
1. A single male bird was observed at S. Gan on four
occasions between 20 and 24 February 2002. It
appeared to be hawking for insects over the grassland
adjacent to the runway.
2. Three falcons were seen at K. Hulhule on 29 November
2002, hovering and hawking for insects on the grass
adjacent to the runway. One was positively identified
as a juvenile Amur Falcon; the other two birds were
similar in appearance and were assumed to have been
Amur Falcons as well but were not seen closely enough
to allow positive identification.
There are only two previously published Maldivian
records with dates, both also from S. Gan: one arriving 5
December 1958 (Phillips 1963), and six present from
November 1964 to January 1965 (Strickland andjenner
1978). The latter authors do, however, also note the
presence of this species (recorded as Red-footed Falcon
Falco vespertinus ) in Addu Atoll as a regular winter visitor
between November and March.
Eurasian Hobby Falco subbuteo
1 . From the records of the RNBWS (T. M. Barry), one
Eurasian Hobby was reported coming on board ship
off the Maldives on 18 November 1979, departing at
about 8°N 74°E.
2. One Eurasian Hobby was seen on several evenings
from 5 to 1 1 November 1996 on K. Meerufenfushi by
M. J. Pointon and J. P. Pointon (in litt. 2002). The
bird (it was presumed to be a single individual) was
seen catching and eating dragonflies. It was positively
identified as this species (M. J. Pointon and J. P.
Pointon in litt. 2003).
* Red-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda
1 . One individual was observed off South Male Atoll at
3°59'N 73°34'E on 1 8 March 2003 by RCA, T. Aylett,
N. Gricks and S. Mustoe.
2. Another individual was seen near K. Kaashidhoo at
5°00'N 73°28'E on 24 November 2006.
Both birds lacked tail streamers, but both were
positively identified as this species. They were seen clearly
and at close range; both had an orange-red bill and lacked
black markings on the upper wing; and both appeared
clearly bigger than White-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon
lepturus, although direct comparison was not possible.
These appear to be the first records of Red-tailed
Tropicbird from the Maldives, although its occurrence is
not unexpected. Indeed, the southern Maldives is included
within the range of this species by Tuck and Heinzel
(1978: 243). In addition, a Red-tailed Tropicbird was
reported from 1 ,7°S 69.8°E (i.e. about 180 nautical miles,
330 km, south-west of Addu Atoll) on 6 April 1987 by J.
G. W. Dixon (Bourne 1989: 18). Because the southern
boundary of the Maldivian EEZ has not yet been
formalised, it is not clear if the 1987 record was from
Maldivian waters or not. Red-tailed Tropicbird breeds at
several locations in the Indian Ocean south of the equator,
including Christmas Island, the Chagos Archipelago, the
Seychelles and Europa Island; observations north of the
equator are relatively rare (e.g. Jakobsen 1994). Two
recoveries of tagged birds demonstrate long-distance
movements across the Indian Ocean from east to west
(Jenkins and Robertson 1969, Le Corre et al. 2003).
Little Egret Egretta garzetta
This species has been characterised as an uncommon winter
visitor, with few previous records from the Maldives, and
none from the far north (Ash and Shafeeg 1 994, Anderson
and Baldock 2001). I have a further 13 records, all
between September and March, which confirm its status
as a winter visitor, but suggest that it is more regular and
widespread than previously recognised. The new records,
by calendar date, are: two 6-7 September 2001
S. Hithadhoo; one 15 and 20 October 2002 H.Dh.
Kulhudhufushi; one 3 November 2001 H.Dh.
Kulhudhufushi; two 13 November 2003 Lh. Kanifushi;
one 16 November 1996 K. Meerufenfushi (M. Pointon
in litt. 15 October 2002); two 17-18 November 2001
H. Dh. Hanimaadhoo; one 18 January and 6 February
2003 A. Etheremadivaru; four 20 and 23 February 2002
S. Hithadhoo; one on four occasions between 9 February
and 1 9 March 2004 V. Anbara; one 1 8 March 1 997 H.Dh.
Kulhudhufushi.
Little Heron Butorides striatus
Two endemic subspecies have been described from the
Maldives: B. s. albidulus from the southern atolls and
B. s. didii from the northern and central atolls. The north-
Forktail 23 (2007)
New records of birds from the Maldives
141
central subspecies is particularly pale and is very distinct
from the much darker subspecies, B. s. javanicus, of the
Indian subcontinent. Two dark individuals that appeared
to be typical B. s. javanicus were seen by RCA, D. Barber
and M. Scott-Ham on H.Dh. Hanimaadhoo on 10
November 2003. The position in the north of the
Maldives, and the date of those sightings, suggest that
some B. s. javanicus may be winter visitors to the Maldives,
where they presumably do not interbreed with the local
B. s. didii.
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax
A single adult was seen at the brackish water lake (Eidigali
Kili) on S. Hithadhoo on both 6 and 7 September 200 1 .
It was noticeably larger than nearby Indian Pond Herons
Ardeola grayii and had all-grey wings, with a black mantle
and crown. Its legs were a dull orange, and it had a distinct
black eye-stripe, as illustrated in Bhushan et al. (1993)
but not in Grimmett et al. (1998). In flight it had a duck¬
like call. An adult bird (possibly the same individual) was
seen at exactly the same location on 23 February 2002.
Two adult birds were seen at the same location again on
7 October 2002 . There has been only one previous record
from the Maldives (Ash and Shafeeg 1994).
Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis
I have a photo of a wild bird taken in Male in the late
1990s, but the details are now lost. A single individual
was seen flying over the sea from the south to K. Asdu on
15 November 2003 by RCA and D. Barber. Another
bird, probably of this species, was seen flying at Lh.
Lhosalafushi on 1 6 April 2003. This species appears to be
an uncommon winter visitor, with the few records so far
(Ash and Shafeeg 1994) all between November and April.
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber
One immature individual was seen at the brackish water
lake (Eidigali Kili) on S. Hithadhoo on 25 March 2001 .
A flamingo, presumably the same one, was reported from
the same site on 10 and 12 June 2001; it was not seen
during visits on 15 and 17 June 2001 (S. Akester verbally
2001). One adult Greater Flamingo was seen at the same
location on 23 February 2002. It is not known if this was
the same individual. A photo of a single bird (presumably
a captive, but without details) was published by
Voightmann et al. (1987: 49).
*SPOT-BILLED PELICAN Pelecanus philippensis
A captive individual was photographed on B. Horubadhoo
(Royal Island Resort) in May 2001 . It had been caught
from the wild on B. Thulaadhoo in January 2001 (this
was confirmed on Thulaadhoo in May 2001). Previous
unconfirmed records of this species were noted by Ash
and Shafeeg (1994) and by Anderson and Baldock (2001).
GREAT FRIGATEBIRD Fregata minor
Weimerskirch et al. (2006) reported the movement of a
satellite-tagged female Great Frigatebird from her nesting
site on Europa Island in the Mozambique Channel, via
Aldabra in the Seychelles, to the island of G. A. Hithaadhoo
in the south of the Maldives. The bird covered a distance
of 5,354 km in less than 13 days. She then remained at
Hithaadhoo for at least 4 months, making regular foraging
excursions (up to a maximum distance of 240 km), until
the tag was shed. Hithaadhoo is well known locally as a
roosting site for both Great and Lesser (F. ariel)
Frigatebirds. It is one of only two islands in the Maldives
regularly used as roosts by frigatebirds, the other being B .
Olhugiri. Hithaadhoo is the more important, with a few
hundreds of frigatebirds regularly using the island, while
the importance of Olhugiri has reportedly declined in
recent years with no more than tens of frigatebirds now
using it. Both islands have mature stands of large softwood
trees which are favoured by the frigatebirds for roosting.
BULWER’S Petrel Bulweria bulwerii
One individual was seen on 22 January 2004, nearly 200
nautical miles west of Dhaalu Atoll at 2°4TN 6934'E. It
was an all-brown small-to-medium-sized petrel, and was
distinguished from Jouanin’s Petrel by its relatively more
slender bill and the presence of an obvious pale, diagonal
upperwing bar. Its flight (in Beaufort Force 3) was low
over the water, with much flapping and some gliding.
Jouanin’s Petrel Bukueria fallax
One individual seen in the Ariyadhoo Channel between
Faafu and Alifu Atolls at about 3°22'N 72°49'E on 24
March 2003 by R. Atkins (verbally 2003). Distinguished
from Bulwer’s Petrel by larger size and lack of any pale on
upperwings. Taleb (2002) described the first known
breeding site, on the island of Socotra, where nesting
appears to occur during July-November.
Wedge-tailed Shearwater Puffinus pacificus
In the Indian Ocean, Wedge-tailed Shearwater breeds
south of the equator, mainly during the austral summer
months (e.g. Harrison 1985, Symens 1999, Skerrett etal.
200 1 ). In the Maldives it occurs commonly from April to
about September as a non-breeding migrant. Starting from
about mid-April large numbers are seen heading north,
often in company with Flesh-footed Shearwater Puffinus
cameipes. These birds are all assumed to be southern
hemisphere, southern summer breeders. However, just
before the start of this northward migration, during the
first half of April, smaller numbers of Wedge-tailed
Shearwaters are seen heading south. The origin(s) and
destination(s) of these birds are unknown. However, it is
possible that they are austral winter breeders, and they
may be heading for the Chagos Archipelago south of the
Maldives.
*SHORT-TAILED Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris
One individual (identified by size relative to nearby
Audubon’s Shearwater, limited grey — not conspicuous
white — on underwings, and short tail with clearly
projecting feet) was seen on 12 November 2003 by
RCA, D. Barber and M. Scott-Ham east of Shaviyani
Atoll (at 6°25'N 73°1 5'E). This species migrates in large
numbers around the Pacific, but is regarded as a vagrant
to the northern Indian Ocean (Frith 1978, Robertson
1994).
Audubon’s Shearwater Puffinus Iherminieri
A morphological study of Audubon’s Shearwater in the
Indian Ocean identified three main populations, with
birds from Maldives being biometrically inseparable from
those from the Seychelles (Bretagnolle et al. 2000). A
more recent genetic study (Austin et al. 2004) suggested
that individuals in the Indian Ocean refer to Tropical
Shearwater P. bailloni.
142
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Forktail 23 (2007)
SWINHOE’S STORM-PETREL Oceanodroma monorhis
1 . One seen in the Fulidhoo Channel between South
Male and Vaavu Atolls at 3°45'N 73°30'E on
9 February 2004 by RCA and also but less clearly by
G. Tucker.
2. One seen off North Male Atoll at 4°16'N 73°35'E on
9 November 2004 by RCA, H. Shirihai, C. Martin,
A. Goddard and others.
3. Another single bird, seen outside north-east Raa Atoll
at 5°5 1 'N 72°50'E on 20 April 2004, was probably of
this species but was not seen clearly enough to claim
this with complete confidence.
Penhallurick and Wink (2003) suggest the use of the
generic name Cymochorea for this species.
*Band-RUMPED Storm-petrel Oceanodroma castro
One bird was seen at close range (to about 10 m as it
crossed our bows) on 9 November 2004 by RCA,
H. Shirihai, C. Martin, A. Goddard and others, east of
North Male Atoll (at 4°1 8'N 73°37'E). It was a medium¬
sized storm-petrel, all dark brown-black except for a
conspicuous white oval rump-patch (which wrapped
around the sides, extending towards, the ventral surface)
and pale upperwing bands. The legs clearly did not
project beyond the slightly forked tail. Other details are
available from the author. This is the first record of Band-
rumped Storm-petrel for the South Asian region. There
appears to be only one previous record for the entire
Indian Ocean, a single bird observed off Eilat in the
northern Red Sea in June 1983 (Shirihai 1987, 1996).
This species may not be quite as rare in the northern
Indian Ocean as suggested by the lack of previous records;
confusion with Wilson’s Storm-petrel Oceanites oceanicus
(a common austral winter visitor and the only white-
rumped dark storm-petrel previously recorded from the
region) is a distinct possibility. Band-rumped Storm-petrel
is also known as Madeiran Storm-petrel; Penhallurick
and Wink (2003) suggest the use of the generic name
Thalobata.
*ASHY Woodswallow Artamus fuscus
A single individual, identified as a juvenile by its pale
throat, was seen flying over Lh. Lhosalafushi on 6
November 2003 by RCA, D. Barber and M. Scott-Ham.
What was probably the same individual, although it was
only identified tentatively as this species at the time, was
seen flying over the adjacent island of Lh. Lohi on the
previous day. It appeared to be hawking above the tree-
tops for insects, presumably dragonflies, which were
abundant on the islands at that time. As noted by All
(1999) ‘their food consists exclusively of dragonflies and
other insects.’
*LARGE CUCKOOSHRIKE Coracina macei
Two birds together were seen clearly at H.Dh.
Kulhudufushi on 18 October 2002. One uttered a
characteristic loud peu-zvee whistle in flight.
Asian Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi
A single individual was seen by Alex and Sarah Carlisle
on H.A. Gallandhoo on 1 7 April 2001 (verbally 2001). A
coloured drawing made by A. Carlisle immediately after
the sighting depicted the bird with a black head and throat,
sharply demarcated from the pale breast, and with rufous
upperparts and tail, the latter lacking long streamers.
This is the third record from the Maldives. Another record
of interest is that of a female at 7°29'N 75°42'E, i.e. 120
nautical miles south-west of the southern tip of India, on
5 November 1979 (Casement 1983).
*Rosy Starling Stumus roseus
1 . Four captive individuals were photographed at B.
Thulaadhoo in May 200 1 . They had all been captured
on the island during the previous north-east monsoon
season (December 2000 to March 2001). Local bird-
catchers reported that Rosy Starlings were regular
(although not especially common) visitors during the
north-east monsoon season.
2 . A single bird came aboard ship at about 5° 1 0N1 77° 1 0'E
(between the Maldives and Sri Lanka) on 19 January
2003 (C. Cousins verbally 2003).
3. A flock of 22 in non-breeding plumage was seen
at Hulhule International Airport on 1 1 February
2007.
SAND Martin Riparia riparia
Sand Martin has been regarded as a regular winter visitor
and passage migrant to the Maldives (Phillips 1963,
Strickland and Jenner 1978, Ash and Shafeeg 1994,
Grimmett et al. 1998). However, Maldives was not
included within the range of this species by either
Kazmierczak and van Perlo (2000) or Rasmussen and
Anderton (2005), these authors raising the possibility of
confusion with Pale Martin Riparia diluta. Some new
records confirm the presence of Sand Martin in the
Maldives.
1 . One individual seen at about 7°N 77°E (between the
southern tip of India and the Maldives) on 1 October
1 983 (Roberts 1 984; dat<j and position from RNBWS
records database compiled by S. Howe and provided
by W. R. P. Bourne in litt. 2001).
2. One martin seen 26 September 1996 off the west side
of Male hawking for insects over the sea was identified
as probable Sand Martin, but it was not seen clearly
enough to exclude other possibilities.
3. One individual seen on 13 November 1996 at K.
Meerufenfushi was positively identified as this
species (M. J. Pointon in litt. 2002); another similat
martin seen in the same week could not be positively
identified.
4. One individual seen on 6 October 2001 north-west
of K. Hululhe hawking for insects over the sea
was positively identified as Sand Martin: it had a
distinct brown chest-band and clearly forked tail.
Three martins were seen on 4 October 2001 and
four on 5 October 2001 in the same general area,
and were tentatively identified as Sand Martins, but
were not seen clearly enough to exclude other
possibilities.
5. Four individuals seen on 6 October 2002 at S.
Hulhudhoo, hawking for insects over the harbour were
positively identified as Sand Martin.
Also of relevance here is the record of Phillips (1963).
In his unpublished notes, W. W. A. Phillips recorded a
Sand Martin at S. Gan on 3 November 1958, specifically
noting that ‘the brown band across the chest was
most distinct.’ All of these sightings occurred between
26 September and 13 November, suggesting that
Sand Martin is an autumn passage migrant through
Maldives.
Forktail 23 (2007)
New records of birds from the Maldives
143
RED-RUMPED Swallow Hinindo daurica
One individual was seen on 3 February 2002 at
K. Fihalhohi by S. Rowland (in litt. 2002). Another was
seen on 18 February 2002 by RCA at K. Rasfari, where
the island watchman reported that four birds of the
same species had arrived one week earlier; the single
remaining bird had pale, faintly streaked, rather than
chestnut, underparts. It was therefore not H. d. hyperythra
from Sri Lanka, but presumably a migrant from further
north. A third individual was seen on 1 1 November 2003
at H.Dh. Hanimaadhoo by D. Barber and M. Scott-Ham
(verbally 1 1 November 2003) . Although there is only one
previous (January) record (Anderson and Baldock2001),
these records suggest that Red-rumped Swallow is
probably a regular northern winter visitor to the northern
Maldives.
*ClTRINE WAGTAIL Motacilla citreola
A single male bird was clearly observed and positively
identified on 1 9 January 1 999 at K. Lohifushi by J. Jansen
(in litt. 2002 and 2006).
DISCUSSION
The 1 5 new records reported here raise the total number
of bird species recorded from the Maldives to 182.
However, this includes three feral species recorded by
Ash and Shafeeg (1994) and two species regarded as
‘hypothetical’ by Rasmussen and Anderton (2005). In
addition the status of the Himalayan Swiftlet Collocalia
brevirostris is now in doubt. There is a need for a critical
review of Maldivian bird records. In addition, it is likely
that northern winter migrants in particular remain under¬
recorded.
As noted before (Ash and Shafeeg 1994, Anderson
and Baldock 2001) there is a need to be aware of imported
pet birds (which are often allowed to run or fly freely). In
addition to the species reported above, three other species
previously unrecorded from the Maldives have been noted,
but all were believed to be escapees. These were: Rain
Quail Cotumix coromandelica , Black-throated Munia
Lonchura kelaarti and Green Avadavat Amandavaformosa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am especially grateful to Mrs. Eileen Wynell-Mayow (daughter of W.
W. A. Phillips) and the late Mr. Richard Wynell-Mayow for their most
generous gift of Phillips’s Maldives notebooks, and also for their unfailing
courtesy and hospitality. For assistance in the field, sincere thanks to
Susan Anderson, Adam Asraf, Tiffany Aylett, Michael Baldock, Derek
Barber, Martin Elcoate, Nathan Gricks, Simon Mustoe, Steve Nixon,
Ian Robinson, Mike Scott-Ham, Abdullah Shaan, Graham T ucker and
Hussein Zahir. For generously sharing information on sightings I am
most grateful to Susan Anderson, Alex and Sarah Carlisle, Caroline
Cousins, Richard Gravestoke, Justin Jansen, Karen Nye, Mike and
Jackie Pointon, Samee Mohamed Rasheed, Stephen Rowland and Zaha
Waheed. Stephen and Jane Akester were particularly helpful with
information and logistical support in Addu Atoll. Abbas Ibrahim and
Naseema Mohamed of the National Centre for Linguistic and Historical
Research kindly advised on local nomenclature. I thank Mohamed
Saleem, the editor and an anonymous referee for critically reviewing a
draft of this paper. For their various courtesies I am also most grateful
to Ahmed Shafeeg, W. R. P. Bourne and Mohamed Shiham Adam.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. (1999) Birds of Kerala. Third, revised edition.
Thiruvananthapuram, India: Kerala Forests and Wildlife
Department.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1969) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan. Volume 2: Megapodes to Crab Plover. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. Second Edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. C. and Baldock, M. (2001) New records of birds from the
Maldives, with notes on other species. Forktail 17: 67-73.
Ash, J. S. and Shafeeg, A. ( 1 994) Birds of the Maidive Islands, Indian
Ocean. Forktail 10: 3-34.
Austin, J. J., Bretagnolle, V. and Pasquet, E. (2004) A global molecular
phylogeny of the small Puffinus shearwaters and implications for
systematics of the Littl e-Audubon’s Shearwater complex. Auk 121:
847-864.
Bhushan, B., Fry, G., Hibi, A., Mundkur, T., Prawiradilaga, D. M.,
Sonobe, K., Usui, S. and Taniguchi, T. (1993) A field guide to the
waterbirds of Asia. Tokyo: Wild Bird Society of Japan and Asian
Wetland Bureau.
BirdLife International (2004) Important bird areas in Asia: key sites for
conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International. (BirdLife
Conservation Series No. 13)
Bourne, W. R. P. (1989) Seabird reports received in 1987 and 1988.
Sea Swallow 38: 7-30.
Bourne, W. R. P. ( 1 996) The larger white-headed gulls wintering around
the southern coasts of Asia. Sea Swallow 45: 86-91.
Bretagnolle, V., Attie, C. and Mougeot, F. (2000) Audubon’s
Shearwater Puffinus Iherminieri on Reunion Island, Indian Ocean:
behaviour, census, distribution, biometrics and breeding biology.
Ibis 142: 399-412.
Buchheim, A. (2006) Adult large white-headed gulls at Okha, Gujarat,
India — a photo-documentation. BirdingASIA 5: 40-53.
Carr, P. (2005) Diego Survey II (2005) Expedition Report. Sea Swallow
54: 6-40.
Casement, M. B. (1983) Land birds from ships at sea. Sea Swallow 32:
23-41.
Chantler, P. and Driessens, G. (1995) Swifts: a guide to the swifts and
treeswifts of the world. Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Daniels, R. J. R. (1992) Island biogeography and the birds of
the Lakshadweep Archipelago. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 88:
320-328.
Frith, C. B. (1978) Short-tailed Shearwaters Puffinus tenuirostris in the
Andaman Sea area, Indian Ocean. Emu 78: 95-97.
Gadow, H. and Gardiner, J. S. (1903) Aves. Pp. 368-373 in J. S.
Gardiner, ed. The fauna and geography of the Maidive and Laccadive
Archipelagoes. Volume 1. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University
Press.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
Subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Harrison, P. (1985) Seabirds: an identification guide. Revised Edition.
London: Christopher Helm.
Hayman, P., Marchant, J. and Prater, T. (1986) Shorebirds: an
identification guide to the waders of the world. London: Christopher
Helm.
Jakobsen, O. F. (1994) Red-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda: a
new species for Thailand. Forktail 10: 177-178.
Jenkins, J. and Robertson, C. J. R. (1969) Banding recovery — Red¬
tailed Tropic Bird. Notomis 14: 211.
Kazmierczak, K. and van Perlo, P. (2000) A field guide to the birds of the
Indian Subcontinent. Sussex: Pica Press.
Kurup, D. N and Zacharias, V. J. (1994) Birds of the Lakshadweep
Archipelago. Forktail 10: 49-64.
144
R. CHARLES ANDERSON
Forktail 23 (2007)
Le Corre, M., Salamolard, M. and Portier, M. C. (2003) Transoceanic
dispersion of the Red-tailed Tropicbird in the Indian Ocean. Emu
103: 183-184.
Morzer Bruyns, W. F. J. and Voous, K. H. (1965) Great Skuas ( Stercorarius
skua ) in northern Indian Ocean. Ardea 53: 80-81.
Olsen, K. M. and Larsson, H. (1997) Skuas and jaegers: a guide to the skuas
and jaegers of the world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Olsen, K. M. and Larsson, H. (2004) Gulls of Europe, Asia and North
America. Second edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Penhallurick, J. and Wink, M. (2003) Analysis of the nomenclature and
taxonomy of the Procellariiformes based on complete nucleotide
sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Emu 104: 125-
147.
Phillips, W. W. A. (1963) The birds of the Maidive Islands, Indian
Ocean. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 60: 546-584.
Phillips, W. W. A. and Sims, R. W. (1958) Some observations on the
fauna ofthe Maidive Islands, 3. Birds. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 55:
195-217.
Prasad, A. (2004) Skua ( Stercorarius ) species in the eastern Arabian Sea.
Sea Swallow 53: 24-30.
Rasmussen, P. C and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Volumes 1 and 2. Washington, D.C. and Barcelona:
Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicioris.
Roberts, D. C. K. (1984) Orient Express Part I: September-October
1983. Sea Swallow 33: 4-6.
Robertson, A. L. H. (1994) Occurrence of some pelagic seabirds
(Procellariiformes) in the waters off the Indian Subcontinent.
Forktail 10: 129-140.
Shirihai, H. (1987) Shearwaters and other tubenoses at Eilat. Dutch
Birding 9: 152-157.
Shirihai, H. (1996) The birds of Israel. London: Academic Press.
Skerrett, A., Bullock, I. andDisley,T. (2001) Birds of Seychelles. London:
Christopher Helm.
Strickland, M. J. andjenner,j. C. (1978) Areport on the birds ofSeenu
Atoll (Maidive Islands). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 74: 487-500.
Symens, P. (1999) Breeding seabirds ofthe Chagos Archipelago. Pp.
257-272 in C. R. C. Sheppard and M. R. D. Seaward, eds. Ecology
ofthe Chagos Archipelago. London: The Linnean Society (Occasional
Publications 2.)
T aleb, N. M. A. (2002) The discovery of a breeding colony of Jouanin’s
Petrel Bulweriafallax on Socotra, Yemen. Sandgrouse 24: 105—108.
Tuck, G. S. and Heinzel, H. (1978) Afieldguide to the seabirds of Britain
and the world. London: Collins.
Voightmann, H., Thonig, M. and Ritter, H. (1987) Maldives.
Nuremburg, Germany: Bloom Verlag.
Weimerskirch, H., Le Corre, M., Marsac, F., Barbraud, C., Tostain,
O. and Chastel, O. (2006) Postbreeding movements offrigatebirds
tracked with satellite telemetry. Condor 108: 220-225.
R. Charles Anderson, P.O. Box 2074, Male, Republic of Maldives. Email: anderson@dhivehinet.net.mv
FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 145-148
The benefits of joining mixed-species flocks for
Greater Racket-tailed Drongos Dicrurus paradiseus
S. HARSH A K. SATISCHANDRA, ENOKA P. KUDAVIDANAGE,
SARATH W. KOTAGAMA and EBEN GOODALE
Drongos are well known to participate in mixed-species bird flocks, but it is not clear whether they are mostly commensalists, catching
insects that other species disturb, or kleptoparasites, stealing food directly from other species. We studied the foraging ecology of Greater
Racket-tailed Drongos Dicrurus paradiseus inside and outside mixed-species flocks in seven areas of a lowland rainforest in Sri Lanka. We
found that drongos in all seven areas fed at a higher rate when in flocks. Kleptoparasitism was practised at a low rate (4% of observations);
more often, drongos captured insects disturbed by other species (4 1 % of observations) . To accrue these benefits, drongos adjusted the
height at which they perched to match the foraging height of Ashy-headed Laughingthrush Garrulax cinereifrons, a species that forages
lower than drongos normally do, and those of Orange-billed Babbler Turdoides rufescens, a species that forages higher than drongos
normally do. We conclude that drongos are better classified as commensalists than as parasites, as they exact only a small cost on other
species in flocks; they may even be mutualists, because they make sensitive and reliable alarm calls to which other species react.
INTRODUCTION
The benefits of mixed-species flocking, whether reduced
predation risk or increased foraging efficiency, are often
analysed as they apply to the flock as a whole (Morse
1977, Terborgh 1990). Different species, however, may
benefit from flocking in different ways (Hino 1998).
Furthermore, species differ in the benefits they provide
to others, with some ‘nuclear’ species being particularly
important to flock formation and cohesion (Moynihan
1962, Hutto 1994). A full description of a mixed-flock
system would therefore depict the flow of different benefits
among a web of species.
The complexity of interspecific relationships within
mixed-species flocks is exemplified by the role of drongos
Dicruridae, which are frequent members of such flocks in
the Old World tropics and Australasia. Drongos may
benefit other species by giving alarm calls and serving as
flock ‘sentinels’, because their sallying foraging technique
makes them particularly vigilant for predators (Munn
1 984, Goodale and Kotagama 2005a) . Alternatively, they
may neutrally affect other species, but accrue benefits
themselves, by catching insects disturbed (‘beat-up’) by
other species (Swynnerton 1915, Hino 1998). Or they
may negatively affect other species through
kleptoparasitism (Brockmann and Barnard 1979, King
and Rappole 2001). To understand whether drongos are
respectively mutualists, commensalists or parasites in a
flock system, all possible interactions must be measured.
A mixed-flock system in the rainforests of Sri Lanka
provides an opportunity to understand fully the
relationship between drongos and other species within a
flock. It has previously been argued that Greater Racket¬
tailed Drongos Dicrurus paradiseus play a sentinel, nuclear
role in this flock system, because they are sensitive in
detecting predators and make reliable alarm calls (Goodale
and Kotagama 2005a), and because other birds are
attracted to a random sample of their vocalisations
(Goodale and Kotagama 2005b). Here, we investigate
the benefits gained by drongos from being in such flocks.
First, we compare the foraging rate and success of drongos
inside and outside flocks. Second, we assess how these
foraging benefits arise; specifically whether drongos act
as commensalists, capturing insects disturbed by other
species in the flock, or as kleptoparasites, stealing prey
items from other flock members. Finally, we examine
whether drongos enhance their likelihood of these foraging
benefits by increasing their proximity to other flock
members. In particular, we investigate whether drongos
adjust their perch height to match that of two leaf-gleaning
species: Ashy-headed Laughingthrush Garrulax
cinereifrons , which forages lower than drongos, and
Orange-billed Babbler Turdoides rufescens, which forages
higher than drongos (Kotagama and Goodale 2004) . We
predicted that the closer drongos were horizontally to
these species, the closer they would be vertically.
METHODS
Study site
The study was conducted in the north-western sector of
the Sinharaja World Heritage Reserve, a rainforest in Sri
Lanka (6°26'N 80°21'E, 400-600 m). Sinharaja is an
evergreen lowland rainforest, with the canopy dominated
by trees of Mesua spp. and Shorea spp. (Gunatilleke and
Gunatilleke 1981). The mixed-species flocks of the reserve
are large (averaging 12 species and 40 individuals), and
are characterised by two species that are found in >90%
of flocks: Greater Racket-tailed Drongo and Orange-billed
Babbler (Kotagama and Goodale 2004).
Data collection
As all observations were made on unmarked birds, flocks
were studied at several different sites within the forest to
enhance sample independence. A previous radio¬
telemetry study of Greater Racket-tailed Drongos showed
that they had home ranges less than 1.5 km in diameter
(Goodale and Kotagama 2006b) . We selected seven areas
of the forest within walking distance of the Sinharaja
Research Station that were each c. 1 . 5 km in diameter and
1.5 km from each other.
Observations were carried out by SHKS and field
assistants. An observation began when a perched drongo
was detected and ended when that drongo flew to a perch
from where it could not be seen; observations therefore
varied in length and so were timed. For each observation,
the following were noted: (a) whether a bird was inside a
146
S. HARSHA K. SATISCHANDRA et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
babbler-led flock (defined as within 10 m of an Orange¬
billed Babbler) or not (drongos outside such flocks were
sometimes loosely associated with other species, but such
associations fell apart quickly and were very different from
typical babbler/drongo flocks); (b) the height, at the start
of the observation, of the drongo’s perch and the horizontal
and vertical distance to the closest Ashy-headed
Laughingthrush and to the closest Orange-billed Babbler;
and (c) how many foraging trips the focal bird made, a
foraging trip being either a ‘sally’ (a circuitous flight
obviously directed towards an aerial insect) or a ‘hover’
(a foraging attempt to capture an insect on a substrate
while hovering in the air). After each observation, the
observer noted whether the drongo had performed any of
the following behaviours during the last foraging trip of
the observation: (a) kleptoparasitised another species by
taking food directly from the bill; (b) chased an insect
another species was chasing (also considered
kleptoparasitism); or (c) captured an insect that was
disturbed by another species (if the path of the insect was
seen or the drongo foraged in an area where vegetative
debris was falling). These three categories were mutually
exclusive. The observer also recorded whether this last
foraging trip was successful in capturing an insect (if a
captured insect was seen or if the drongo was seen
manipulating an insect in its bill).
Analysis
In the original design of the study, the unit of replication
was the seven different areas in which we sampled.
However, because not all data were available from all
areas, sample sizes were sometimes too small for statistical
analysis between areas. Hence, we also investigated the
strength of relationships within areas. To test whether
drongos adjust their foraging height to match leaf-gleaning
species, we compared the vertical and horizontal distances
between the drongo and the other species using simple
linear regressions for each area separately. Whenever we
made tests on multiple areas, we adjusted the a-level of
the test accordingly.
RESULTS
Greater Racket-tailed Drongos foraged at a significantly
higher rate inside flocks (mean±SE foraging trips per
minute = 0.43±0.04) than they did outside flocks
(0. 1 2±0.04; Wilcoxon test: W =28, W =0, N=7,
v J pos J neg 0 0
P< 0.025). This relationship was apparent in all seven
areas, although significant in only five of them (Table 1).
Foraging success was also significantly higher inside flocks
(175 successes in 303 observations that included foraging
trips, 58%) than outside flocks (8 successes in 24
observations that included foraging trips, 33%, Fisher’s
Exact Test, P=0.03). This trend was found in the five
areas for which it could be calculated, but was not
significant in any of them.
When in mixed-species flocks, 4 1 % of drongo foraging
trips involved the capture of insects disturbed by other
species (T able 2) . In a large majority of these cases, insects
were disturbed by Orange-billed Babblers (81%); the
remainder were dominated by trunk-gleaning or probing
species, such as Indian Scimitar Babblers Pomatorhimis
horsfieldii (6%), Velvet-fronted Nuthatches Sitta frontalis
(4%), Lesser Yellownapes Picus chlorolophus (3%) and
Black-rumped Flamebacks Dinopium benghalense (3%).
Compared with the capture of disturbed insects, drongos
showed a very low rate (3%) of kleptoparasitism (Table
2). Eighty-five percent of the 20 kleptoparasitic events
involved food taken directly from the bill of another bird;
Table 1. The foraging rate of Greater Racket-tailed Drongos inside and outside mixed-species flocks.
Forktail 23 (2007) The benefits of joining mixed-species flocks for Greater Racket-tailed Drongos
147
Table 3. The relationships between the vertical distance (VD) and the horizontal distance (HD) from a Greater Racket-tailed Drongo to the
nearest Orange-billed Babbler and Ashy-headed Laughingthrush. No Ashy-headed Laughingthrushes were present in three of the areas. Symbols
after area names correspond to those in Fig. 1 .
Figure 1. The tendency for Greater Racket-tailed Drongos to match the foraging heights of leaf-gleaning species led to drongos perching lower
when close to the ground- and understorey-feeding Ashy-headed Laughingthrushes (a), and perching higher when close to the subcanopy-feeding
Orange-billed Babblers (b). Regression lines are for the separate areas; symbols correspond to areas listed in Table 3. Note that the y-variable
here (perching height) is not the same as the response variable (vertical distance) in Table 3.
in the remainder, drongos caught an insect another bird
had been chasing. In the majority of kleptoparasitism
cases, the victim was a leaf-gleaning babbler (7 5 % Orange¬
billed Babbler, 10% Ashy-headed Laughingthrush); the
remainder of incidences involved Malabar Trogon
Harpactes fasciatus (10%) and Indian Scimitar Babblers
(5%).
Drongos tended to match their perching height to the
foraging height of leaf-gleaning species. Drongos that were
closer horizontally to Ashy-headed Laughingthrushes were
also closer to them vertically in all four areas that could be
tested, and significantly so in two areas (Table 3). The
same trend held for Orange-billed Babbler: the closer
drongos were horizontally to babblers, the closer they
were vertically in all seven areas tested, and significantly
so in four areas (Table 3). This behaviour resulted in
drongos foraging lower when horizontally close to Ashy¬
headed Laughingthrushes, and higher when horizontally
close to Orange-billed Babblers (Fig. 1).
DISCUSSION
This study adds to the considerable body of evidence that
drongos, and sallying species more generally, benefit from
associating with other animals. Drongos have been
reported to follow a wide variety of animals from ungulates
(H erremans and Herremans-Tonnoeyr 1997) to
woodpeckers (Styring and Ickes 2001), and may even
make use of phenomena that disturb insects such as
wildfires (Ali and Ripley 1987). We found that Greater
Racket-tailed Drongos in Sri Lankan rainforests foraged
at a higher rate and were more successful when they joined
mixed-species bird flocks. This is consistent with earlier
studies in India, where Veenaand Lokesha (1993) showed
that drongos increased their foraging rate and success
when associating with mynas, and in Madagascar, where
Hino (1998) showed that drongos and another sallying
species (Madagascar Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone
mutata) foraged more successfully when in mixed-species
flocks. Drongos in Sri Lanka rarely foraged alone and
thus seem to be quite dependent on their association with
other species in flocks.
Two mechanisms have been proposed by which
sallying species, such as drongos, benefit from mixed-
species flocks: the beating effect (Swynnerton 1915), in
which these species capture flushed insects, or
kleptoparasitism (Brockmann and Barnard 1979). In
some earlier studies, kleptoparasitism was argued to be
important (Hino 1998,), whereas in others the benefit of
beating predominated (Veena and Lokesha 1993,
Herremans and Herremans-Tonnoeyr 1997, Styring and
Ickes 2001). Our study showed that Greater Racket-tailed
Drongos use both mechanisms, but that kleptoparasitism
is relatively infrequent in comparison with beating. Greater
Racket-tailed Drongos in the mixed-species flocks of the
148
S. HARSHA K. SATISCHANDRA et al.
Forktail 23 (2007)
Sinharaja World Heritage Reserve in Sri Lanka can
therefore be considered more commensal than parasitic
with respect to their foraging ecology.
Greater Racket-tailed Drongos appeared to adjust their
spatial position in flocks to increase their proximity to
other species. The Ashy-headed Laughingthrush is one
of the few species in Sri Lankan flocks that tends to forage
at a lower height than drongos (Kotagama and Goodale
2004), and drongos foraged lower when associated with
laughingthrushes. Similarly, drongos matched their height
to that of nearby Orange-billed Babblers, which forage
higher on average than drongos (Kotagama and Goodale
2004). One explanation for these results is that drongos
may benefit from a dilution effect, in which proximity to
another individual reduces the risk of predation (Terborgh
1990). Our impression, however, is that other sallying
species, such as Asian Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone
paradisi and Malabar Trogon, also forage lower when
laughingthrushes are present, whereas leaf-gleaning
species such as Orange-billed Babbler do not adjust their
height. This suggests that the primary reason why drongos
adjust their foraging height is to maximise the benefit
from the beating effect.
Drongos use their vocal behaviour to increase their
proximity to other species, by vocally mimicking the songs
and contact calls of other species (Goodale and Kotagama
2006a) . Since drongos benefit from associating with other
species, this mimicry could be an adaptive, manipulative
behaviour. The reason why other species have not evolved
an ability to detect and avoid being attracted to such
mimicry, and why other species did not act aggressively
towards drongos may be because the costs of associating
with drongos are low: the rate of kleptoparasitism in this
study was only 3%. Moreover, other species may benefit
from the presence of drongos, owing to their sensitive
and reliable alarm calls (Goodale and Kotagama 2005a).
Future studies should investigate whether other species
adjust their behaviour to avoid being close to drongos, so
avoiding being vulnerable to kleptoparasitism, orwhether
they lower their vigilance when drongos are present, relying
instead on the drongos’ alarm calls.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Sri Lanka Forest Department for giving us permission to
work in the forest and to use the Sinharaja Research Station. The
exploratory data of Prasanjith Caldera on drongo ecology was very
helpful in designing this study. We thank A. G. Kirteratne and P.
Ashoka Jayarathna for their excellent work in the field, and we appreciate
the help of S. A. W. Shanta Kumara at the research station. The
comments of two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the
manuscript. For financial support, we are grateful for grants from the
National Science Foundation (U.S.A) to EG.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan, together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri
Lanka. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Brockmann, H. J. and Barnard, C. J. (1979) Kleptoparasitism in birds.
Anim. Behav. 27: 487-514.
Goodale, E. and Kotagama, S. W. (2005a) Alarm calling in Sri Lankan
mixed-species bird flocks. Auk 122: 108-120.
Goodale, E. and Kotagama, S. W. (2005b) Testing the roles of species
in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. J. Prop. Ecol.
21: 669-676.
Goodale, E. and Kotagama, S. W. (2006a) Vocal mimicry by a passerine
bird attracts other species involved in mixed-species flocks. Anim.
Behav. 72: 471-477.
Goodale, E. and Kotagama, S. W. (2006b) Context-dependent mimicry
by a passerine bird. Proc. Roy. Soc. Bond. B. 273: 875-880.
Gunatilleke, C. V. S. and Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N. (1981) The floristic
composition of Sinharaja rain forest in Sri Lanka, with special reference
to endemics and dipterocarps. Malay. Forester 144: 386-396.
Herremans, M. and Herremans-Tonnoeyr, D. (1997) Social foraging of
the Forktailed Drongo Dicrurus adsimilis: beater effect or
kleptoparasitism? Bird Behav. 12: 41-45.
Hino, T. ( 1 998) Mutualistic and commensal organization of avian mixed-
species foraging flocks in a forest of western Madagascar. J. Avian
Biol. 29: 17-24.
Hutto, R. L. (1994) The composition and social organization of mixed-
species flocks in a tropical deciduous forest in Western Mexico.
Condor 96: 105-118.
King, D. I. and Rappole, J. H. (2001) Kleptoparasitism of
laughingthrushes by Greater Racket-tailed Drongos in Burma
(Myanmar). Forktail 17: 121-122.
Kotagama, S. W. and Goodale, E. (2004) The composition and spatial
organization of mixed-species flacks in a Sri Lankan rainforest. Forktail
20: 63-70.
Morse, D. H. (1977) Feeding behaviour and predator avoidance in
heterospecific groups. BioScience 27: 332-339.
Moynihan, M. (1962) The organization and probable evolution of some
mixed-species flocks of Neotropical birds. Smithsonian Misc. Coll.
143: 1-140.
Munn, C. A., Ill (1984) The behavioural ecology of mixed-species bird
flocks in Amazonian Peru. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Princeion
University, Princeton U.S.A.
Munn, C. A. (1986) Birds that ‘cry wolf. Nature 391: 143-145.
Styring, A. R. and Ickes, K. (2001) Interactions between the Greater
Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus and woodpeckers in a
lowland Malaysian rainforest. Forktail 17: 1 19-120.
Swynnerton, C. F. M. (1915) Mixed bird-parties. Ibis (10)3: 346-354.
Terborgh, J. (1990) Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: costs
and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys. Amer. J. Primatol.
21: 87-100.
Veena, T. and Lokesha, R. (1993) Association of drongos with myna
flocks: are drongos benefitted? J. Biosciences 18: 1 1 1-1 19.
.S’. Harsha K. Satischandra, Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Sabaragamuwa University,
Buttala, Sri Lanka. Email: harshashk@yahoo.com
Enoka P. Kudavidanage, Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Sabaragamuwa University,
Buttala, Sri Lanka. Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of
Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543. Email: enoka.kudavidanage@gmail.com
Sarath IV. Kotagama, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Colombo, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka. Email:
fogsl@slt. Ik
Eben Goodale, Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA 01003. Current
address: The Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA USA 02139. Email: egoodale@mit.edu
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
149
Three new records from Lubang island, Philippines
A. TOWNSEND PETERSON
Limited information is available regarding birds of the
small, fringing islands in the Philippine Archipelago.
Lubang island, although close to Luzon and Manila, has
seen remarkably little exploration. Indeed, a recent
summary (Dickinson et al. 1991) indicated that it had
received detailed surveys only by McGregor in October-
November 1902 and by Forbes in July 1913, although
some subsequent visits must have occurred.
Here, I report on a small collection made recently on
Lubang island, documenting three new island records:
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus , Glossy Swiftlet
Collocalia esculenta and Mangrove Blue Flycatcher Cyomis
nifigastra. The kingfisher record represents an extension
of the overall known range of the species northward from
Mindoro.
A survey team of herpetologists and mammalogists
from the University of Kansas Natural History Museum
and Biodiversity Research Center (KUNHM) worked
on Lubang island during 5-14 December 2005 . The team
camped in second growth and selectively logged primary
forest at 150 m (13.796°N 120.159°E), and — as part of
the surveys — occasionally collected birds at night by
spotlight, as well as a few swiftlets from small caves. All
birds captured had snippets of liver tissue sampled and
preserved in 95% ethanol, and the remainder of the bird
preserved in formalin as a voucher and specimen for study.
All specimens mentioned below — as well as additional
material of bird species not constituting new records —
are deposited at KUNHM. New records, with brief
commentary, are as follows:
Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher Ceyx erithacus
This species ranges from South and South-East Asia
through the Sundas into the Philippines, where it is known
to occur on Palawan and satellite islands, the Sulu
Archipelago, and on Mindoro (Kennedy et al. 2000). As
such, its occurrence on Lubang island, documented by
five specimens collected (KUNHM 97123-97127),
extends its known distribution northward, curiously close
to Luzon, where the congeneric Philippine Dwarf
Kingfisher C. melanurus is present. Limited comparisons
suggest that the Lubang island series is not distinct from
populations on Mindoro (subspecies C. e. rufidorsum).
GLOSSY Swiftlet Collocalia esculenta
This species is known to occur broadly across the
Philippines, including on many small and fringing islands
(Kennedy etal. 2000) . It is present on Luzon and Mindoro,
which are adjacent to Lubang island. The five specimens
collected (KUNHM 97 1 29-97 133) are referable to C. e.
marginata , instead of C. e. bagobo of the southern
Philippines.
Mangrove Blue Flycatcher Cyomis rufigastra
This species is widespread, ranging from South-East Asia
into the Sundas, Sulawesi, and the Philippines (Kennedy
etal. 2000) . Its occurrence on Lubang island, documented
by four specimens collected (KUNHM 97120-97122,
971 28), is therefore not surprising. Subspecies C. r. blythi
is present on Luzon to the east, whereas C. r. mindorensis
is on Mindoro to the south. Determination of the
subspecific affinities of the Lubang populations, however,
must await the availability of better comparative material,
as the differences between subspecies are subtle, and
preservation in formalin has some effects on the fine details
of coloration.
Other species represented in this small collection include
White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smymensis , Philippine
Bulbul Hypsipetes philippinus , Black-naped Monarch
Hypothymis azurea, Rufous Paradise-flycatcher
Terpsiphone cinnamomea , Purple-throated Sunbird
Nectarinia sperata and Lovely Sunbird Aethopyga shelleyi.
The three new records, even among such a small and
preliminary collection, suggest that much remains to be
learned from detailed surveys on Lubang island, as well
as many other small, isolated islands across the Philippines.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many thanks to Rafe Brown, Jake Esselstyn, Edmund Rico, Viscente
Yngente, Nonito Antoque and Cameron Siler for their efforts to secure
bird specimens during their own fieldwork. Thanks also to the Protected
Areas and Wildlife Bureau, Philippine Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, for facilitating collecting and export permits
necessary for fieldwork components of this and related studies.
REFERENCES
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines. Tring, U.K.: British Ornithologists’ Union.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, H. C. J.
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A. Townsend Peterson, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
66045 U.S.A. Email: town@ku.edu
150
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Nesting ecology of the Painted Stork
Mycteria leucocephala at Sultanpur National Park,
Haryana, India
ABDUL JAMIL URFI, THANGARASU MEGANATHAN and ABDUL KALAM
The Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala is a prominent
species of Indian heronries and wetlands. Given that this
stork is listed as Near Threatened (BirdLife International
2001), it is worrying that its nesting ecology, especially
the factors affecting nesting success, is poorly understood.
While a relationship between rainfall and nesting intensity
has long been known (e.g. Ali and Ripley 1987), this has
not been investigated in detail. Previous observations have
also indicated that many more individuals are present at
colonies at the beginning of the breeding season than
actually breed (Ali and Vijayan 1983), but this
phenomenon has not been investigated further. T o address
these issues, we studied reproductive output, causes of
nest failure, the number of adults in nesting colonies, and
factors associated with yearly variation in nesting densities
of the Painted Stork at Sultanpur National Park
(henceforth Sultanpur), in Haryana, India.
STUDY SITE
Sultanpur (28°28'N76°53'E, c.25 km south-east of Delhi)
is located in a predominantly agricultural landscape,
crisscrossed by irrigation canals (Fig. 1 ) . The national park
covers an area of 13,727 ha (Islam and Rahmani 2004) and
includes as its core c.143 ha of low-lying marshes, which
were notified as a bird sanctuary by the Haryana state
government in 1971 (Kalpavriksh 1994). The dominant
terrestrial vegetation in this area consists of trees of Prosopis
juliflora, Acacia nilotica, Tamarindus indica and Azadirachta
indica, and grasses such as Vetiveria zizanioides and Erianthus
ravennae. Plants recorded in the marshy areas of the park
include submerged vegetation such as Vallisneria natans
and Ceratophyllum demersum, emergents such as Typha
angustata, Saccharum munja and Cyperus rotundus , and
surface vegetation such as Nymphaea stellata , N. nouchali
and Ipomoea reptans (Kalpavriksh 1994). As a part of its
management policy, the park authorities embarked upon a
tree plantation programme during the 1980s. Several
mounds were created in the lake and Acacia nilotica trees
planted on them. There are now about 50 islands, including
one large island (c. 100x40 m) in the centre of the marsh
(Fig. 1). Painted Storks nest on this island and on some
smaller islands with canopy diameter < 1 0 m, together with
Indian Cormorant Phalacrocorax fuscicollis, Cattle Egret
Bubulcus ibis, Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax
nycticorax, Black-headed Ibis Threskiomis melanocephalus
and Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans (Urfi et al. 2005a).
METHODS
We visited Sultanpur once each in October and November
2002, and on an average of once per fortnight from August
2003 to December 2005. Painted Storks visit Sultanpur
to breed between August and January and are typically
absent in other months. We recorded the arrival date of
Painted Storks each year by consulting park staff. Roost
counts were made between 17h00 and 19h00, using
binoculars (7x50) and a telescope (15x). A sample of
nests (Table 1) was monitored on a regular basis during
2004-2005 from an elevated spot, approximately 50 m
from the south-eastern edge of the heronry (Fig. 1). The
nests were located on subsequent occasions by
Figure 1 . Map of Sultanpur National Park Haryana, India. Detailed
observations of the main heronry (black oblong) were made from a point
due south (marked ‘x’). The solid single line indicates the parkboundary,
the double line indicates paths, the dotted line denotes the edge of the
marsh, and small circles represent islands. The top left inset shows the
location of Sultanpur in relation to Delhi and the Najafgadh drain. The
smaller inset (right) shows the location of Delhi within India.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
151
Table 1. Dates of arrival and nesting, and nesting intensity of Painted
Stork at Sultanpur National Park, Haryana, India, during 2002-2005.
identification marks in their vicinity, including the shape
of branches and the number of neighbouring nests. To
assist repeated identification of pre-selected nests on
successive visits, rough sketches were made from
photographs and used for reference in the field.
The dates when first eggs were laid were determined
by direct observation (whenever possible) by ourselves or
park staff. Clutch size was taken as the number of eggs in
a nest after the last egg had been laid. Percent hatching
success for each nest was calculated as the number of eggs
that hatched divided by the clutch size (Desai etal. 1977,
Coulter and Bryan 1995). We followed the procedure
used by Desai et al. (1977) for calculating percent nesting
success by dividing the number of chicks fledged in a nest
by its clutch size. We noted instances of egg or chick loss
in all nests in view, including the sample nests described
above. Each chick that was observed to be attacked by a
raptor was placed in one of the three age categories (1-30
days, 30-45 days and >45 days) determined by its
morphology and plumage, following Shah and Desai
(1975). Data on rainfall patterns were obtained from the
Indian Meteorological Department, Delhi. Monsoon
rainfall was taken as the sum of rainfall (in mm) recorded
at Delhi from June to September. We used linear regression
to investigate the relationship between monsoon rainfall
and number of nests built each year.
During the period of their residence in Sultanpur,
Painted Storks make foraging flights out of the park and
their numbers in the park are highly variable at different
hours of the day (Urfi et al. 2005b). However, the storks
return to roost in the park, so we made evening counts,
which we assume included both individuals of all nesting
pairs. Nesting activity continued until November (in
2005). In order to examine seasonal differences we
classified nests built in August and September as ‘early’
and those built in October and November as ‘late’. We
tested for differences in clutch size between early and late
nesters using two-tailed t-tests. Statistical analyses were
carried out in Minitab (version 11.0). Summary statistics
are presented as mean ± SE.
RESULTS
The average arrival date of the first Painted Stork at
Sultanpur during 2003-2005 was 1 8 August and the first
eggs were laid between 17 August and 23 September
(T able 1 ) . While most nests were built in the main heronry
on the largest island, a few (1 5 in 2003 and four in 2005)
were built on the smaller islands nearby. During the course
of a day, Painted Storks were observed flying in and out
of the park, especially in the direction of the Najafgadh
drain, which is located 6 km north of Sultanpur (Fig. 1)
and has a number of associated marshes. However, we
were unable to confirm whether these marshes were indeed
the main foraging destination for the storks.
Linear regression analysis revealed a positive, although
non-significant relationship between the number of nests
built in a year and the total rainfall (in mm) during the
monsoon (slope = 0.079±0.024, N=4, r2=0.8174, NS).
In September 2002, 2003 and 2005, the number of
adult storks present at Sultanpur was, respectively, 28%,
19% and 8% greater than would be expected from the
nest counts (assuming each active nest is occupied by a
monogamous breeding pair; Fig. 2). This suggests that
non-breeding individuals were present in the colony in
the initial phase of nesting. However, this pattern was not
observed in 2004, possibly because many birds abandoned
their nests and left Sultanpur early in the season owing to
a sudden shortage of water in the park that year (Saxena
2004).
Month
Figure 2. Monthly counts of adults (#) and active nests (■) of Painted
Stork, plus expected number of adults (O) based on the number of nests
at Sultanpur National Park during 2003-2005. Note that in 2004 the
birds abandoned nesting owing to changes in the water levels in the
park (see text).
Nesting success
The modal clutch size for all months and years combined
was two (range 1-4). The frequency of different clutch
sizes was approximately normally distributed
(Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests; early season 2004: P>0. 1 5,
N=25; 2005: P>0. 1 5, N=32; late clutches 2005: P>0. 1 5,
N=8). Early nests had significantly larger clutch sizes in
2005 (early nests: mean=2.03±0. 1 5, N=32 nests; late
nests: mean=1.37±0. 18, N= 8 nests; r=2.81, P=0.012).
The mean clutch size for early nests in 2004 and 2005 was
2.04±0.17, N=25 nests and 2.0310.15, N=32 nests,
respectively (r= 0.04, P= 0.97).
In October 2004, 18 marked nests with eggs were
found abandoned. The eggs (n=37) in these nests were
presumably depredated by House Crows Corvus splendens
after abandonment. It is likely that nest abandonment
was brought about by a sudden shortage of water in the
park which happened because the Haryana Urban
Development Authority cut off the water supply to the
park (Saxena 2004). In October 2004 and September
2005, we recorded at least 12 cases in seven active nests
of egg predation by House Crows, indicating that this
species can be a major predator of Painted Stork eggs. In
addition, nine eggs were found lying unattended in five
nests in 2005, but the reason for these instances of nest
failure could not be ascertained. During 2004-2005, eight
chicks in eight different nests were observed being
depredated by Greater Spotted Eagles Aquila clanga. Of
152
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
these, three chicks were <30 days old, two were 30-45
days old and three were >45 days old. During the same
period Eurasian Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus were
observed to prey upon seven nestlings (all <30 days old)
in six nests. In addition, ten chicks in 2005 were found
dead from unknown causes between 1 1 September and
3 December 2005. There were other, minor, causes of
egg and chick loss: in one case, an egg was observed to roll
off the nest during the course of a territorial fight between
two adults, and in another, an egg rolled out of its nest
following a strong gust of wind. The mean hatching success
in 2004 (27±8.8%, N=25 nests) was significantly lower
than in 2005 (65±6.9%, N=32 nests; r=3.38, D=0.001),
with nesting success showing a similar pattern (9.0±5.3%,
N=25 nests in 2004; 46±7.4%, N=32 nests in 2005;
r=4.09, P<0.001).
DISCUSSION
Painted Storks were first observed breeding in Sultanpur
in 1993, when 40 nesting pairs were found (Poole 1994).
Thereafter, their nesting here was sporadic, until around
2000, after which it occurred annually. The arrival dates
at the colony and the nest initiation dates are similar to
those reported for this species nesting in the wild within
the premises of Delhi zoo (Desai et al. 1977). Painted
Storks congregate at Sultanpur only during the nesting
season, and they are absent from this site during the rest
of the year. A similar pattern has been observed at Delhi
zoo (Urfi 1997) and Keoladeo Ghana National Park,
Bharatpur (Ali and Vijayan 1983).
Rainfall during the breeding season might be
expected to explain annual variation in nesting intensity
(i.e. number of nests), because monsoon rains produce
high food abundance and create safe nesting islands by
flooding surrounding lower-lying areas (Urfi 1998). We
found a positive but non-significant relationship
between rainfall and nesting intensity, so this requires
further study.
We observed that more birds are present at the colony
at the beginning of the season than would be expected
from the number of nests. In seabirds, non-breeding
individuals, both immature and adult, may be permanent
residents within a colony, defending territories,
constructing rudimentary nests and even assisting in
raising young (Kharitonov and Siegel-Causey 1988). In
many colonial waterbirds, the nesting site may also serve
as a roosting site, so the occurrence of additional
individuals may be coincidental or related to opportunities
for obtaining food while chicks in the colony are being fed
(Burger 1981). However, Painted Storks congregate only
during the nesting period, so this explanation is unlikely.
The extra individuals could be helpers, perhaps genetically
related to the nesting pair (Skutch 1976), they could be
individuals attempting to enhance their fitness through
extra-pair copulations (Westneat et al. 1990), or they
could breed in polygynous trios as has been recorded in
7.7% of Cattle Egret nests in one study (Fujioka 1986).
Further studies on Painted Storks using marked birds are
necessary to examine these possibilities.
We found that early nests had larger clutches than late
nests in at least one year (2005). Such a difference has
also been recorded in other birds (McNeil and Leger
1987), and may arise because low-quality individuals
breed later or because later nests are dominated by smaller
replacement clutches. The average hatching success
reported for Painted Stork at Delhi zoo during 1966-
1971 was 68% (Desai et al. 1977), which is higher than
our estimates at Sultanpur (27% in 2004 and 65% in
2005). The nesting success at Sultanpur (9% in 2004 and
46% in 2005) was also lower than that recorded at Delhi
zoo (34-54%). Predation by raptors, particularly Aquila
spp. eagles, is a major factor responsible for chick loss at
north Indian heronries (Naoroji 1 990, Sundar 2005) and
may explain the greater nestling losses here compared
with Delhi zoo, where these predators are absent.
CONSERVATION
Sultanpur is listed as an Important Bird Area (Islam and
Rahmani 2004) and 322 bird species have been recorded
from here (Harvey 2003) . Other than at Delhi zoo, suitable
nesting sites for Painted Stork are becoming scarce in the
region. MacDonald (1962) described a nesting colony
close to Faridabad (c.25 km south of Delhi), but this has
probably disappeared. Another colony was recorded near
Bijana village close to Sonipat, Haryana, in 1992, with
about 40 active nests (Urfi 1993) but here too no nesting
activity has been recorded during the last decade. These
losses underscore the regional importance of the remaining
sites at Delhi zoo and Sultanpur.
The nesting habitat at Sultanpur appears to be
improving. The trees of the heronry have become larger
and mature, and are now more effectively isolated by
floodwater than they were in the past. However, several
other issues are a matter of concern. Painted Storks and
other heronry birds are strongly dependent on areas
outside the national park for foraging, and there is
considerable pressure on this land. In Gurgaon region,
where Sultanpur is located, built-up areas
increased dramatically between 197 1 and 2002,
leading to a reduction in open spaces, including
agricultural lands, waterlogged areas and scrublands
(Gupta and Nangia 2005). In the future, Sultanpur will
become even more isolated by development and manyof
the prime foraging sites outside the park will most
likely disappear. The original complex of marshes and
wetlands, of which Sultanpur was a part, has already been
lost (Gaston 1994). To safeguard Sultanpur and the
nesting birds which it supports, steps need be taken to
curb the expansion of development in the areas around
the park, especially in the buffer zone surrounding it.
Field studies aimed at determining important foraging
sites for the heronry birds of Sultanpur are required. There
is also an urgent need to closely monitor these birds and
to implement conservation action plans, for which
volunteers and birdwatchers from Delhi and Haryana
can be an asset.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of Environment
and Forests, Government of India, for carrying out this study. We
thank the staff of Sultanpur National Park for their support and the
Haryana Forest Department for permitting us to carry out our studies.
Suresh Sharma provided help and suggestions in the field while Tony
Gaston and T. R. Rao commented on the manuscript.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
153
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Vijayan, V. S. (1983) Hydrobiological (ecological) research at
Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur. First interim report. Mumbai:
Bombay Natural History Society.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Burger, J. (1981) A model for the evolution of mixed-species colonies
of ciconiiformes. Q. Rev. Biol. 56: 143-167.
Coulter, M. C. and Bryan Jr, L. (1995) Factors affecting the reproductive
success ofWood Stork ( Mycteria americana) in east-central Georgia.
Auk 112: 237-242.
Desai, J. H., Menon, G. H. and Shah, R. V. (1977) Studies on the
reproductive pattern of the Painted Stork, Ibis leucocephalus,
Pennant. Pavo 15: 1-32.
Fujioka, M. (1986) Two cases of bigyny in the Cattle Egret Bubulcus
ibis. Ibis 128: 419-422.
Gaston, A. J. ( 1 994) Some comments on the ‘revival’ of Sultanpur lake.
Oriental Bird Club Bull. 20: 49-50.
Gupta, R. K. and Nangia, S. (2005) Population explosion and land use
changes in Gurgaon city region — a satellite of Delhi metropolis.
Unpublished paper downloaded on 18 August 2006 from:_http://
iussp200 5. princeton. edu/download.aspx?submissionId
=50502#search=%22iussp2005.pnnceton.edu%2Fdownload.aspx%
3FsubmissionId%3D50502%22.
Harvey, B. (2003) Checklist of the birds of Sultanpur. Downloaded on
1 8 August 2006 from: http://www.delhibird.net/content/view/73/89.
Islam, M. Z. and Rahmani, A. R. (2004) Important Bird Areas in India:
priority sites for conservation. Mumbai and Cambridge, U.K. : Bombay
Natural History Society and BirdLife International.
Kalpavriksh (1994) Small and beautiful Sultanpur National Park. New
Delhi: Kalpavriksh.
Kharitonov, S. P. and Siegel-Causey, D. (1988) Colony formation in
seabirds. Curr. Ornithol. 5: 223-272.
MacDonald, M. (1962) Birds in the sun: some beautiful birds of India.
London: D.B. Taraporevala.
McNeil, R. and Leger, C. (1987) Nest-site quality and reproductive
success of early and late-nesting Double-crested Cormorants. Wilson
Bull. 99: 262-267.
Naoroji, R. (1990) Predation by Aquila eagles on nestling storks and
herons in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 87: 37-46.
Poole, C. (1994) Sultanpur lake revived. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 19:
15.
Saxena, P. (2004) HUDA shuts off water flow to bird sanctuary, Times
News Network , 29/10/04. Downloaded on 18 August 2006 from:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/903181 .cms.
Shah, R. V. and Desai, J. H. ( 1 975) Growth and development of Painted
Stork Ibis leucocephalus Pennant. II. Post hatching growth pattern
and motor development. Pavo 13: 88-101.
Skutch, A. F. (1976) Parent birds and their young. Austin, Texas: Texas
University Press.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2005) Predation of fledgling Painted Stork Mycteria
leucocephala by a Spotted Eagle Aquila spp. in Sultanpur National
Park, Haryana. Indian Birds 1: 144-145.
Urfi, A. J. (1993) Heronries in the Delhi region of India. Oriental Bird
Club Bull. 17: 19-21.
Urfi, A. J. (1997) The significance of Delhi Zoo for wild waterbirds,
with special reference to the Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala.
Forktail 12: 87-97.
Urfi, A. J. (1998) A monsoon delivers storks. Natural History 107: 32-
39.
Urfi, A.J., Meganathan, T., Kalam, A. and Mahendiran, M. (2005a)
Nesting of Asian Openbill and other heronry birds at Sultanpur
National Park (IBA). Mistnet 6: 10-1 1.
Urfi, A.J., Sen, M., Kalam, A. and Meganathan, T. (2005b) Counting
birds in India: methodologies and trends. Curr. Sci. 89: 1997-
2003.
Westneat, D. F., Sherman, P. W. and Morton, M. L. (1990) The
ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulation in birds. Curr.
Ornithol. 7: 331-369.
Abdul Jamil Urfi, Thangarasu Meganathan and Abdul Kalam, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Delhi,
Delhi 110 007, India. Email: ajurfi@rediffmail.com
White-winged Duck Cairina ( =Asarcornis ) scutulata
and Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus : two
new country records for Bhutan
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
In this note I report the recent addition of two new species
to the list of Bhutan’s avifauna.
WHITE-WINGED Duck Cairina (—Asarcomis) scutulata
This is an Endangered species (BirdLife International
2004), occurring from north-eastern India to Indonesia
(Green 1992, Choudhury 1996, 2000, BirdLife
International 2001). In north-eastern India, it is mainly
known from the rainforests of eastern Assam (Ah and
Ripley 1987, Choudhury 2002). In Assam, the bird has
not been recorded from areas close to the India-Bhutan
international boundary. The nearest record was from near
Barpeta (c.26°25'N 91°02/E, c.50 km south of the nearest
point on India-Bhutan international boundary) in 1886
by Stuart Baker (Green 1992). It is resident in its range
across South-East Asia with some local movement
depending on water conditions (Choudhury 2000,
BirdLife International 2001).
154
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
On 3 August 2006, 1 observed and video-recorded the
first instance of a White-winged Duck in the Mathanguri
(Matharguri) area (26°47'N 90°58'E) of Manas National
Park, Assam, India (Choudhury 2006). The duck was
resting by the side of a pool at 1 7h 1 5, about 30 m away
from me. The light was good, and with a 10x telescope,
I could see its blackish-brown upperparts with metallic
green hue. The underparts from breast to flanks were
chestnut-brown. The head and neck were white with black
speckles. The bill was orange-yellow with black spots,
and the legs were also orange-yellow, but paler than the
bill. When the bird took flight after about a minute, a
large white patch on its wing shoulders (upper wing-
coverts) became prominent. The bluish-grey secondaries,
which I had not noticed earlier, were also visible in flight,
as seen in the video recording. Its small size and slightly
dull coloration suggested that the bird was not an adult
male. The iris colour differs between the sexes (orange-
yellow in the male; brown in the female), but the eyes
were closed when the bird was resting and the iris could
not be observed. Later that day I saw one (possibly the
same individual) and heard two more ducks of this species
at 1 8h00 and 1 8h 1 0, respectively. The calls were recorded
on the audio track of the video camera. On the morning
of 4 August at 04h50, one White-winged Duck was seen
on the water and two others in a tall Bombax ceiba tree. At
05h 1 5, one duck perched low in a B. ceiba tree, in semi¬
silhouette, was video-recorded with a Sony camcorder
(20x optical zoom). On 9 August at 17h50, a call was
heard in the same area.
On the night of 3 August 2006, i.e., the day of the first
sighting, at around 19h30 I heard the honking call of
White-winged Ducks near the forest bungalow at
Mathanguri on the international border. One duck was
seen and it is possible that I missed another one because
of poor visibility. The bird(s) flew from south to north
and then turned towards the south-east. In the process it
(they) flew between the Boundary Pillars numbered 200
and 200/2 between India and Bhutan, just below the
bungalow (26°47'N 90°57'E), thus entering Bhutan.
Subsequently, the forest staff who camp on the border at
Mathanguri for patrol duty also heard honks at night,
when the ducks flew from south-east to north-west, i.e.,
towards Royal Manas National Park, Bhutan. There was
no possibility of confusion with other species by the forest
staff, as the wintering geese Anser spp., and the Ruddy
Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea, whose honks might be
confusing for those unfamiliar with the calls of C. scutulata,
were absent at that time of year. The White-winged Duck
has a distinct honking call, which is uttered while on the
water (rarely), while roosting, and also during flight
(Choudhury 1996). All the feeding and roosting sites of
the White-winged Duck observed by me in Manas were
between 500 m and 1 km from the India-Bhutan
international boundary.
Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus
The Blue-tailed Bee-eater is a common species in
the plains of India. It occurs as a summer visitor in the
Gangetic and Brahmaputra plains while in peninsular
India it is mainly a winter visitor (Ali and Ripley 1987).
In Assam, it is mainly a common summer visitor.
However, because some birds remain until November
and others arrive early in April, it has been treated as a
resident undergoing some local migration (Choudhury
2000). In Assam, the bird has been recorded in many
areas close to the India-Bhutan international border,
notably in Manas National Park (26°44'N 91°12'E), in
the Ultapani area (26°43'N 90°18'E) of Chirang Reserved
Forest (Kokrajhar district) and also in Kumarikata
(26°45'N 9 1°33'E) and Guabari (26°47'N 9 1°40'E) areas
(Baksa district).
At about 1 1 h 1 5 on 22 June 2006, 1 observed 10 Blue¬
tailed Bee-eaters perched on electric wires near the first
check gate on the way to Nganglam town in Samdrup
Jonkar district of Bhutan (26°49'N 91°13'E). The site
was about 1 . 5 km from the Indian border (Manas National
Park, Assam) and was a clearing at an elevation of about
200 m. The birds were perched on two wires and were
conspicuous because of their number. Earlier in the
morning, while driving from Nalbari to Koklabari en route
to Nganglam, I saw a few perched on electric lines between
Jalahand Kamardoisa (Lakkhi Bazar) (26°42'N91°12'E),
in Baksa district, Assam (India).
The birds were about 1 5 m away and were easily
identifiable even with the naked eye. They were
conspicuously larger than the commoner Green Bee-eater
Merops orientalis. Still, I used a 10x scope and located
one bird to make a detailed description. It was, like
other bee-eaters, a slender, richly coloured bird,
predominantly green with a narrow blue patch on its face.
A black eye-stripe was conspicuous. The throat was yellow
and brown while the beak was black. Its rump and tail
were blue with two elongated central tail-feathers or ‘tail-
pins’. One of the ‘tail-pins’ was shorter than the other.
Later on, I scanned the rest of the group and confirmed
that all were of the same species. Subsequently, I saw at
least seven birds flying (singly and not as a group) and
catching insects in the air in the Choki area covering both
Bhutan (Samdrup Jongkar district) and India (Subankhata
Reserved Forest, Baksa district) (26°48'N 91°25'E) on
5 September 2006.
The other bee-eaters found in Bhutan and Assam
are Green Bee-eater (much smaller and without the blue
tail), Chestnut-headed Bee-eater M. leschenaulti
(conspicuous chestnut head and almost square-ended
tail with a partial notch) and Blue-bearded Bee-eattr
Nyctyomis athertoni (much larger, different coloration and
square-ended tail), all of which are distinct from the Blue¬
tailed Bee-eater. It could have been confused with the
rather similar- looking Blue-cheeked Bee-eater
M. persicus but this species is known from drier north¬
western India (Ali and Ripley 1 987) and sighting of such
numbers on both India and Bhutan side seemed
impossible. Moreover, on closer observation, the blue
tail and rump distinguishes Blue-tailed from Blue-cheeked
Bee-eater, which has green tail and rump. The Blue¬
tailed Bee-eater has not been reported from Bhutan earlier
(Inskipp et al. 2004, Spierenburg 2006).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following for their help during my visits: A.
Rabha (Field Director), R. Bhattacharjee (Deputy Field Director), S.
Sharma (Assistant Executive Engineer, E & D department), Hakim,
Moinul Haq (both drivers), M. Saikia, G. Medhi, Das, Talukdar,
Baishya (all of Assam police), members of -the Manas Maozigendri
Ecotourism Society, Bijoy Choudhury of Barama and the Drukpa (SDO)
of Nganglam for his hospitality during my visit to Bhutan.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
155
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. Second edition. Bombay, India: Oxford University
Press.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia. Cambridge,
U.K.: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world. CD-ROM,
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Choudhury, A. U . (1996) Survey of the White-winged zuood duck and the
Bengal florican in Tinsukia district and adjacent areas of Assam and
Arunachal Pradesh. Guwahati, India: The Rhino Foundation for
Nature in North-east India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati, India: Gibbon
Books and WWF-India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2002) Conservation of the White-winged Wood
Duck Cairina scutulata in India. Pp. 52-64 in A. R. Rahmani and
G. Ugra, eds. Birds of wetlands and grasslands: proceedings of the
Salim Ali Centenary Seminar on conservation of avifauna of wetlands
and grasslands. Mumbai, India: Bombay Natural History Society.
Choudhury, A. U. (2006). White-winged Wood Duck Cainwa5ctr?M/a?a
in Manas. Mistnet 7(3): 13-14.
Green, A. J. (1992). The status and conservation of the White-winged
Wood Duck Cairina scutulata. Special Publication Nol7.
Slimbridge, UK: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research
Bureau (Special publication No. 17).
Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T. and Grimmett, R. (2004) Birds of Bhutan. New
Delhi, India: Timeless Books.
Spierenburg, P. (2006) Birds in Bhutan: status and distribution. Bedford,
U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
Anwaruddin Choudhury, Deputy Commissioner, Baksa. Correspondence: The Rhino Foundation for Nature in North-east
India, c!o Assam Co. Ltd, Bamunimaidam, Guwahati 781 021, Assam, India. Emaihbadru 1 @sify. com
Further significant bird records from Atauro Island,
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
COLIN R. TRAINOR and PEDRO J. LEITAO
The bird fauna of Atauro island, Timor-Leste (East
Timor; 1 50 km’, 23.5 km north of Dili) was summarised
in Trainor and Soares (2004), who listed 84 species.
Atauro is the largest and highest (995 m) of two islands
now administered by Timor-Leste. It is part of the
volcanic Inner Banda Arc and has had a different
evolutionary history to adjacent Timor island. Despite
this, only the finschi race of Olive-brown Oriole Oriolus
melanotis suggested any influence on the avifauna by Wetar
island (18 km north-west), and no bird species
characteristic of the Flores-Alor island chain was recorded
(Trainor and Soares 2004) . The presence of 1 4 restricted-
range birds including the Endangered Timor Green
Pigeon Treron psittaceus highlighted the conservation
importance of the island (Trainor and Soares 2004). One
site on Atauro, Mount Manucoco, has been recognised
as a ‘protected wild area’ by the Timor-Leste government
(UNTAET 2000) but there is limited management on
the ground.
The number of resident birds known on each island in
Wallacea depends on many factors including: island size,
habitat diversity, elevation range, extent of disturbance
and degree of isolation from source populations as well as
survey effort (Trainor 2002, 2005a). Understanding
patterns of species richness on islands can therefore
highlight survey priorities.
METHODS
Here we provide updated information on the birds of
Atauro island collected by three ornithologists. Jan Keast
(JK) visited the east coast on 1 December 2003; CRT
visited during 19-24 April 2005, mainly within 2 km of
Makadade village at 500-700 m on the central plateau of
the island; and PJL visited during 21-24 December 2005,
making observations mostly around Tua Koin and
between Tua Koin, Mt Manucoco, Anartutu and open
waters between Dili and Atauro.
To explore survey adequacy we examined the
relationship between number of resident bird species and
island area for Atauro and ldother ‘Timor-group’ islands.
Lists of resident birds were generated from White and
Bruce (1986), Coates and Bishop (1997), Trainor (2005a)
and CRT (unpublished data).
RESULTS
We recorded 13 species new to the island, and made
notable observations of nine other species.
Rainbow Lorikeet Trichoglossus haematodus
Three birds were seen on 22 December 2005 flying
through open Eucalyptus alba savanna woodland,
supporting the anecdotal report in Trainor and Soares
(2004) . The subspecific identity of this taxon is unknown,
and more observations are needed to determine this.
White-throated Needletail Hirundapus caudacutus
New island record. Two birds were observed on 22
December 2005 flying a few kilometres north-east of
Anartutu (c. 400 m altitude). Most records of this migrant
in the Nusa Tenggara region occur during the period of
southward migration during September-January (Coates
and Bishop 1997).
156
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
House Swift A pus affinis
Four birds were seen on 22 December 2005 flying over
Anartutu, at 500 m. This bird breeds on Timor (e.g. on the
Christ statue at Dili-Cristo Rei, April 2006; CRT personal
observations) and it is probably resident on Atauro.
Metallic Pigeon Columba vitiensis
New island record. This inconspicuous forest pigeon was
observed in a forested gully at 500 m, with additional
observations in the same gully by F. Alves. It is well known
to local hunters who call it maram (this name was
erroneously given for Black Cuckoo Dove in Trainor and
Soares 2004). Although infrequently observed, the
Metallic Pigeon is known from most of the ‘high’ islands
of the Lesser Sundas and would be expected for Atauro
(Coates and Bishop 1997).
Barred-necked Cuckoo Dove Macropygia
( amboinensis ) magna
Restricted-range. This bird was previously noted from a
voice record only. One bird was shot in a forested
ravine at 500 m on 23 April 2005. The following
measurements were taken: tail length: 220 mm, tarsus: 23
mm, wing: 195 mm, and bill: 18.5 mm. Barred-necked
Cuckoo Dove is locally common in tropical forest and
secondary forest in Timor-Leste (CRT personal
observations)
Black Cuckoo Dove Turacoena modesta
Near threatened; restricted-range. On 2 1 April 2005, the
rapidly repeated hoo wuk call of this pigeon was heard at
c.700 m in a forested gully c. 1 km east of Anartutu. Black
Cuckoo Dove is well-known to local hunters who call it
‘lam dam' (F. Alves, verbally, 2005) and not maram as
noted in Trainor and Soares (2004). This bird is
widespread and frequent in tropical forest and secondary
forest in Timor-Leste (CRT, pers. obs.).
Pink-headed Imperial Pigeon Ducula rosacea
Near threatened; restricted-range. Eight birds were seen
on 22 December 2005 in a small area of Eucalyptus alba
savanna at around 300 m, suggesting that the species is
locally common, contra Trainor and Soares (2004) who
stated that this species was uncommon.
White-breasted Waterhen Amauromis phoenicurus
New island record. An immature was observed and video-
recorded at the edge of agricultural land on 2 1 April 2005,
where it fed on drying corn. The bird was slaty-grey with
a streaked white chest, white cheeks and wings, buff
undertail-coverts, black bill and dark grey legs.
EASTERN Curlew Numenius madagascariensis
New island record. One bird was observed near Tua Koin
on 1 December 2003. In Timor-Leste this species occurs
regularly in small numbers, either staging for short periods,
or wintering on mangrove-backed mudflats (Trainor
2005b).
SANDERLING Calidris alba
New island record. One individual was observed on 1
December 2003 on the beach near Beloi harbour. This
species appears to occur uncommonly along the coast of
Timor-Leste (Trainor 2005b) but more survey effort is
needed along beaches and exposed reefs.
Malaysian Plover Charadrius peronii
Near Threatened. Two pairs were present on the Tua
Koin beach on 24 April 2005. These were aggressively
territorial, with birds raising their head feathers, giving
loud pip calls and forcing intruders back to their territory.
One pair was present between 2 1 and 24 December 2005.
This species remains relatively common along the T imor-
Leste coast (Trainor 2005b).
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
New island record. One bird was seen on 1 December
2003 on a beach c. 1 km south of Beloi. This species stages
in small to large numbers in Timor-Leste during the period
of southward migration (mostly September-December;
Trainor 2005b).
LITTLE Tern Sterna albifrons
New island record. One bird was seen on 22 December
2005, feeding over coral reefs off Tua Koin. The species
is a regular but uncommon breeding visitor to Timor-
Leste (Trainor 2005b).
Brown Noddy Anous stolidus
New island record. Up to eight birds were seen during
21-24 December 2005, actively feeding over corals reefs
off Tua Koin.
White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster
One bird was seen flying over Mount Manucoco on 22
December 2005. This confirms previous anecdotal reports
that the species occurs on Atauro (Trainor and Soares
2004).
GREAT Egret Casmerodius albus
New island record. One individual was observed on a
beach c.4 km south of the northern tip of the island on 1
December 2003. This species is frequent in Timor-Leste,
particularly along mangrove-backed mudflats (Trainor
2005b).
GREAT Frigatebird Fregata minor
Two records of Great Frigatebird confirm the anecdotal
report in Trainor and Soares (2004). A male flew over the
Atauro-Dili ferry on 2 1 December 2005 and a female was
seen c.20 km south of Beloi harbour during the crossing
on 24 December 2005.
White-faced Storm-petrel Pelagodroma marina
New island record. Two groups of eight and four birds
were observed flying parallel to the Atauro-Dili ferry c. 1 0
km and 5 km south of Beloi harbour respectively on 21
December 2005. They had white underparts, medium-
dark brown upperparts, white rump, black primaries, dark
tail-sides and a characteristic facial pattern with a white
supercilium and a dark band from the eye to the ear-
coverts. Seabirds are poorly known in the region and this
is one of the few observations of this species in Wallacea.
Coates and Bishop ( 1 997) suggested that this species was
probably a regular winter visitor to Wallacea, but this is
the first record for the Timor region.
White-breasted Woodswallow Artamus
leucorynchus
A flock of around 20 birds was observed on 22 December
2005 flying over Eucalyptus alba savanna woodland, near
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
157
Vila, suggesting that it is locally common rather than rare
(see Trainor and Soares 2004).
Orange-sided Thrush Zoothera pewnii
Near threatened; restricted-range. One bird was seen
perched on a mangrove tree south ofVila on 2 1 December
2005. Trainor and Soares (2004) recorded this species at
700-850 m, but it clearly occurs from sea level to the
mountains on Atauro.
SUNDA THRUSH Zoothera andromedae
New island record. This inconspicuous forest bird was
observed once in a forested gully at 670 m near Anartutu
on 22 April 2005. It was also seen later by T. Soares at the
same location and it or another was seen by F. Alves at a
nearby gully on the same day. Both this species and
Orange-sided Thrush are called manglolometar in the
Makadade language, with the latter species considered to
represent the female.
TREE Martin Hirundo nigricans
New island record. Two birds were seen on 22 December
2005 over an area of open Eucalyptus alba savanna between
Tua Koin and Mount Manucoco. This species is resident
on Timor, with additional migrants arriving during the
Australian winter (Coates and Bishop 1 997); it is probably
a visitor to Atauro.
Oriental Reed Warbler Acmcephalus orientalis
New island record. One individual was observed on 22
December 2005 a few kilometres north of Anartutu (c.300
m) in mixed woodland-scrub in a valley, c.400 m uphill
from the nearest stream. The bird was singing with loud
and harsh grating and churring notes as described by
Coates and Bishop (1997). This appears to be the first
record of the species for the Timor region since specimens
were collected from Dili in April 1932 (Mayr 1944).
Tricoloured Parrotfinch Erythrura tricolor
Restricted-range. Two fledglings were observed in forest
trees among gardens at 670 m on 22 April 2005. Each
bird had a half-grown tail, yellow lower mandible, dark
grey upper mandible, light grey-brown breast and belly,
green wings and back and a red rump. During the 1 2 km
walk from Anartutu to Tua Koin on 24 April two other
immatures were seen and several birds heard calling at
the edge of three forested ravines at 500-600 m. The call
is a single note, high-pitched rising szuik. These records
confirm the previous anecdotal report (Trainor and Soares
2004) and indicate that this species is relatively common
in forests of the central plateau. There is a single previous
breeding record for this species from Timor, with egg-
laying extrapolated to have occurred in May (Noske 2003),
but our record suggests laying in February or early March.
The Tricolored Parrotfinch is considered locally
moderately common on Timor (Coates and Bishop 1997);
on mainland Timor-Leste its status is poorly known, but
it appears to be highly local (CRT personal observations) .
DISCUSSION
Four of the new island records are residents, including
inconspicuous species such as Metallic Pigeon, White¬
breasted Waterhen and Sunda Thrush, giving a revised
Figure 1. Relationship between number of resident bird species and
island area for 14 islands in the ‘Timor-group’: 1 = Luang, 2= Terbang
Utara, 3= Terbang Selatan, 4= Jaco, 5= Sermata, 6= Kisar, 7= Led,
8= Damar, 9= Moa, 1 0= Romang, 1 1 = Babar, 1 2= Atauro, 1 3= Wetar
14= Roti, 15= Timor.
total of 67 residents out of the 97 bird species known for
the island. Most of the new island records are of migrant
shorebirds and seabirds, and none was of restricted-range
species . Our observations add significantly to information
on the birds of Atauro, and indicate that the composition
of the bird fauna is increasingly well known. However the
taxonomic status and abundance of some species requires
further investigation (e.g. Timor Green Pigeon, Rainbow
Lorikeet and Olive-brown Oriole).
A comparison of island area and bird diversity shows
a clear dichotomy between recently versus historically
surveyed islands (Fig. 1). Most recently surveyed islands
fell above the regression line (e.g. Terbang Utara, Terbang
Selatan, Jaco, Atauro, Roti and Timor islands), indicating
that they have richer than expected resident bird faunas
and therefore may have been relatively well surveyed.
Islands that have not been surveyed in the past 30 years
(e.g. Wetar, Babar, Moa and Sermata) have fewer resident
species than expected, suggesting that they have been
relatively poorly surveyed. For example, Wetar (2,684
km2) is almost 20 times larger in area than Atauro, but on
current information has only four more resident species.
The identification and management of key natural
areas on Atauro must be a high priority, given its unique
evolutionary history and complement of birds and other
wildlife. We found that coastal, savanna and forest habitats
on Atauro maintain a rich natural heritage in spite of
historically intensive use of some landscapes for
agriculture. Forests on the volcanic geology of Mt
Manucoco have in particular been heavily converted to
agriculture, whereas Eucalyptus savanna on limestone is
mostly intact. Active management of forests on Mt
Manucoco would be valuable for both wildlife and
maintaining catchments of water sources in the south of
the island.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank: Thomas Soares and Francisco Alves for help in the field and
for providing information on the birds of Atauro; Jan Keast for kindly
supplying her bird records; Bonifasio Soares and Flaminio Xavier
(National Directorate for Environmental Services) for their support of
158
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
this survey; and INDE - Intercoopera^ao e Desenvolvimento
(Portugal) for funding PL’s travel to Timor-Leste as part of a volunteer
programme.
REFERENCES
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland: Dove Publications.
Mayr, E. (1944) The birds of Timor and Sumba. Bull Amer. AIus. Nat.
Hist. 83: 126-194.
Noske, R. A. (2003) The breeding seasons of Birds on Timor. Kukila
12: 31-43.
Trainor, C. R. (2002) The birds of Adonara, Lesser Sundas, Indonesia.
Forktail 18: 93-100.
Trainor, C. R. (2005a). Birds of Tapuafu peninsula, Roti island, Lesser
Sundas, Indonesia. Forktail 21: 121-131.
Trainor, C. R. (2005b) Waterbirds and coastal seabirds of Timor-
Leste (East Timor): status and distribution from surveys in August
2002-December 2004. Forktail 21: 61-78.
Trainor, C. R., and Soares, T. (2004) Birds of Atauro Island, Timor
Leste (East Timor) Forktail 20: 41-48.
UNTAET (2000) On protected places. Regulation No. 2000/19 on
protected places. Dili: East Timor.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia): an annotated check¬
list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union (Check-list No 7).
Colin R. T rainor, BirdLife International and T topical Savannas Management Cooperative Research Centre, Charles Darwin
University 0909, Northern Territory, Australia. Email: colin.trainor@cdu.edu.au
Pedro J. Leitdo, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada ‘Prof. Baeta Neves’, Portugal; and Centre for Environmental Sciences,
University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SOI 7 1BJ, U.K. Email: p.leitao@soton.ac.uk
New island records and new elevational records of
birds from South Maluku, Indonesia
FRANK E. RHEINDT and ROBERT O. HUTCHINSON
During an expedition to the islands of Burn (3°S 126-
127°E) and Seram (2-3°S 127-1 30°E), South Maluku,
from 29 August through 20 September 2006, new island
records were made for two bird species. Furthermore, we
recorded a number of species at elevations higher or lower
than previously reported. In the following account, we
give details of these new records. Island endemic races
are identified by their subspecific name.
RUFOUS-NECICED SPARROWHAWKAccipitererythrauchen
ceramensis
This raptor was seen once in Burn and twice in Seram, the
last sighting being of an adult flying by at close distance in
the vicinity of the village of Solea near Wahai, Seram, on
17 September 2006, at c.150 m. This species has
previously not been recorded below 650 m on Seram
(Coates and Bishop 1997), and it has been suspected to
be replaced by the Variable Goshawk Accipiter
novaehollandiae at lower elevations (Verbelen 1994). Our
identification was based on the clearly visible rufous sides
of the neck, which contrasted with the pale grey breast
that is so typical of the subspecies ceramensis of South
Maluku, and that readily sets this form apart from the
local race ofVariable Goshawk /l. novaehollandiae hiogaster
and from Chinese Sparrowhawk A. soloensis.
Gurney’s Eagle Aquila gumeyi
We saw this eagle on two occasions in Seram, both times
significantly above the upper altitudinal limit of c.900 m
given by Coates and Bishop (1997) for Maluku. The first
sighting was of an adult circling overhead along higher
parts of the highway from Masohi to Wahai on 7 September
2006 at c. 1,200 m. The second sighting was also of an
adult seen from the trail that traverses Kobipoto Ridge in
Manusela National Park on 1 5 September 2006 ate. 1,200
m. During both observations, the birds were seen well and
the clear structural and plumage differences (e.g. shorter
tail, dark cere, all-black plumage) that distinguish this
species from the common Black Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
and immature White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus
leucogaster were noted.
ASIAN Dowitcher Limnodromus semipahnatus
We saw and photographed two individuals of this Near
Threatened Eastern Palearctic shorebird on Seram: <3ne
was found in mangrove mudflats at Air Besar, c.3 km east
of Wahai (Seram) on 8 September 2006 (Plate 1), and the
second one was seen on Pulai Sawai off the northern
coast of Seram on 20 September 2006 These two birds
constitute the first record of this species in Maluku
Province. The birds were clearly recognisable as this
species and could be told apart from godwits Limosa spp.
by plumage details (e.g. lack of wing-bar) and the
distinctly-shaped all-black bill (Plate 1). In Wallacea,
Asian Dowitcher has previously been recorded only once
each in Sulawesi and West Timor (Coates and Bishop
1997). More recently, Trainor et al. (2006) recorded an
individual of this species during passage in Sumba. The
species winters from north-western Australia to Sumatra
and is therefore probably a regular but widely overlooked
passage migrant in Maluku.
GREAT Cuckoo Dove Reinwardtoena reinwardtii
On 1 1 September 2006, we recorded and photographed
an individual on Mt Binaya (Seram) at c. 1,600 m (Plate
2). Subsequently, on 19 September .2006 we repeatedly
saw a single individual in coconut plantations and
mangrove habitat at sea level near Air Besar, c.3 km east
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
159
of Wahai (Seram). Both records fall outside the
documented elevational range of 1 50-1,000+ m given for
Seram by Coates and Bishop (1997).
Superb Fruit Dove Ptilinopus superbus
This species was common in the lowlands of Seram, with
the highest record of a female at 1,100 m on Kobipoto
Ridge in Manusela National Park in pristine montane
forest on 15 September 2006. The bird was easily
distinguished from females of the locally much more
numerous White-bibbed Fruit Dove P. rivoli by its white
belly and vent and by dark speckling on the wings. Coates
and Bishop (1997) report the upper limit of this species
as 700 m in Seram.
RED-BREASTED PYGMY Parrot Micropsivta bruijniipileata
This inconspicuous canopy bird has previously been
recorded at 700-900 m on Seram (Coates and Bishop
Plate 1 . Asian Dowitcher Limnodromus semipalmatus at Air Besar, Wahai,
Seram, 8 September 2006. (Robert Hutchinson / Birdtour Asia.)
Plate 2. Great Cuckoo Dove Reinwardtoena reinwardtii at c. 1,600 m
MtBinaya, Seram, 1 1 September 2006. (Robert Hutchinson /Birdtour
Asia.)
1997). On 9 September 2006, we photographed
individuals of a flock of about 40-60 birds that were mostly
clinging to a tree trunk and feeding off its bark in selectively
logged lowland forest along the trail from the village of
Roho to Kanikeh just outside the boundaries of Manusela
National Park at c.400 m above sea level (Plate 3). This
constitutes an extension of the previously known
altitudinal range of the poorly known Seram population
of this bird.
Moluccan Scops Owl Otus magicus magicus
We flushed and photographed an individual at c. 1 ,000 m
around the foot of Mt Binaya near the village of Kanikeh
on Seram on 10 September 2006 (Plate 4). Coates and
Bishop (1997) do not give an elevational range for this
species on Seram. However, our record slightly exceeds
uppermost elevations given for this species on most other
neighbouring islands.
Plate 3. Red-breasted Pygmy Parrot Micropsitta bruijniipileata at c. 400
m between Roho and Kanikeh, Seram, 9 September 2006. (Robert
Hutchinson / Birdtour Asia.)
Plate 4. Moluccan Scops Owl Otus magicus magicus at c. 1,000 m near
Kanikeh, Seram, 10 September 2006. (Robert Hutchinson / Birdtour
Asia.)
160
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
MOLUCCAN BOOBOOK Ninox squamipila squamipila
During the night of 1 4 September 2006, we tape-recorded
a pair and photographed one individual near our base-
camp at 2, 1 00 m on Mt Binaya (Seram) . This is far above
the previously reported elevational limit for the Seram
populations of this species (1,400 m; Coates and Bishop
1997).
Streaky-breasted Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias
addita
This Buru endemic is known to inhabit montane forest at
475-1,460 m (Coates and Bishop 1997, Poulsen and
Lambert 2000). We commonly encountered this species
in forest of a wide elevational range and disturbance
spectrum. Our highest record was from primary montane
forest at c. 1,500 m along a trail above the village of
Memboli in central Buru on 31 August 2006, while our
lowest record was from heavily disturbed roadside scrub
at only 350 m along the logging track near Waetabi Camp,
and well within sight of the beach.
Snowy-browed Flycatcher Ficedula hyperythra
negroides
This endemic Seram race was common in temperate forest
on Mt Binaya around 1,900-2,300 m on 14-16 September
2006. We did not advance any higher than 2,300 m, so
the bird might occur higher yet. We rarely recorded this
species below 1,900 m on Mt Binaya, though we did see
it at c. 1,350 m on Mt Kobipoto (on 1 5 September 2006).
Therefore, the elevational range of this species appears to
be centred above 2,000 m on Mt Binaya. As in the case
of other montane birds that are commonest above 2,000
m on Mt Binaya, Coates and Bishop (1997) indicate an
upper elevational limit of 2,000 m, even though this falls
right within the elevational centre of the altitudinal
distribution of this species.
Cinnamon-chested Flycatcher Ficedula buruensis
ceramensis
The Seram race seems to be restricted to bamboo
vegetation in montane forest. During our visit, we
recorded it sparingly at hilly mid-elevations, with the
highest record in a bamboo thicket in intact montane
forest on Mt Kobipoto at c. 1,250 m on 14 September
2006. This is notably higher than the upper elevational
limit of 900 m reported by Coates and Bishop (1997) for
Seram.
OLIVE Honeyeater Lichmera argentauris
This small-island specialist was seen at high densities on
tiny Pulau Opin, an islet near Pulau Sawai off the northern
coast of Seram. The 2-ha island was inhabited by c.30-
100 individuals, some of which were observed flying away
from the island towards the mainland of Seram, which
can be reached by crossing c.2 km of open water. The
only other record for the Seram area is an observation of
this species on Lusaolate located off the north coast of
Seram (Coates and Bishop 1997).
SCARLET MyzOMELA Myzomela dibapha elisabethae
Coates and Bishop (1997) cite the elevational range of
the Seram race elisabethae as 600-1,400 m. However,
even though we did see many individuals around 1,000-
1,400 m on Mt Kobipoto (15-16 September 2006), on
Mt Binaya the elevational range of this species seems to
be substantially higher, and here we only saw individuals
of this species above 2,000 m, with the highest sighting
being of a juvenile with a distinctly reddish throat but
otherwise drab plumage at 2,300 m ( 1 1 September 2006) .
We doubt the species occurs lower than 1,800 m on Mt.
Binaya, because montane habitat features like epiphyte
growth become very sparse below that elevation on this
mountain complex.
Rufous-throated White-eye Madanga mficollis
Little is known about this Endangered species, which had
not been recorded for decades before it was rediscovered
near Lake Rana in central Buru in the 1990s (Coates and
Bishop 1997). On 31 August 2006, we saw and
photographed two individuals at 1 ,750 m above the village
of Memboli in central Buru (Plate 5). The birds were
clinging to tree-bark and feeding in a nuthatch-like manner.
Later, we observed another two individuals c. 1 00 m further
down the trail. The birds seemed to be restricted to a
peculiar type of montane forest that is characterised by
strong epiphytic growth and stunted tree growth. The
elevation at which we saw the species was the lowest altitude
of occurrence of this particular habitat. We suggest that
this species is probably still common within its restricted
altitudinal zone on Buru, since none of its range seems to
have been affected by human encroachment yet. The lack
of previous records seems to be attributable to their high-
elevation distribution and the fact that few researchers
have ascended to high enough elevations. Our record is
the highest yet of this species. The sight record from the
1990s (C. Robson in litt. 2006) and subsequent records
(Poulsen and Lambert 2000) were made at 1,450-1,470
m, probably in small isolated pockets of suitable ‘elfin
forest’ habitat that are scattered further down the slope
because of suitable edaphic and microclimatic conditions.
However, a 1 922 specimen record from Wa Fehat at 820
m is suspiciously low, and it would be worth investigating
whether this could involve a case of mislabelling (e.g.
missing the digit 1 in 1,820 m).
Plate 5 . Rufous-throated White-eye Madanga ruficollis at 1 ,750m above
Memboli, Buru, 3 1 August 2006. (Robert Hutchinson / Birdtour Asia.)
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
161
BLUE-FACED PARROTFINCH Erythrura trichroa pinaiae
In central Buru, we recorded small flocks of this species
three times in montane forest above the village of Memboli,
at 850 m, 1,000 m and 1,750 m, respectively. These
sightings establish a wide elevational range of this species,
which has previously been recorded only once at 1,500 m
on Buru (Coates and Bishop 1997).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are indebted to K. David Bishop for extremely useful
comments on a first draft of this manuscript. The second author
would like to acknowledge Birdtour Asia Ltd for financial assistance on
this trip.
REFERENCES
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Queensland: Dove Publications.
Poulsen, M. K. and Lambert, F. R. (2000) Altitudinal distribution and
habitat preferences of forest birds on Halmahera and Buru,
Indonesia: implications for conservation of Moluccan avifaunas.
Ibis 142: 566-586.
Trainor, C. R., Benstead, P. J., Martin, K., Lesmana, D., Agista, D.,
Benstead, M. C., Drijvers, R. and Setiawan, I. (2006) New bird
records for Nusa Tenggara islands: Sumbawa, Moyo, Sumba,
Flores, Pulau Besar and Timor. Kukila 13: 6-22.
Verbelen, F. (1994) Ornithological trip report to Seram, Kai and
Tanimbar, Indonesia, June-August 1994. Unpublished report
distributed by the author.
Frank E. Rheindt, Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Australia. Email:
formic arius@hotm ail. com
Robert O. Hutchinson, c!o 26 Sutton Avenue, Chellaston, Derby DE73 6RJ, U.K. Email: robhutchinson@birdtourasia.com
Records of Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus
asiaticus breeding pairs fledging four chicks
K. S. GOPI SUNDAR, ARPIT DEOMURARI.YASHODHAN BHATIA
and S. PRASANTH NARAYANAN
Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus is among
the rarest of the stork species in India (Rahmani 1989,
Sundar 2004) with very few studies on their breeding
success (Sundar 2003). They nest solitarily and have
clutch sizes of 3-4 eggs, with 1-3 chicks usually fledging
successfully from each nest (Ishtiaq 1998, Maheswaran
1 998, Sundar 2003, G. Clancy in litt. 2006) . In this note,
we report three instances of Black-necked Stork pairs
fledging four chicks each from three different locations in
India, and discuss possible reasons for the occurrence of
this unusual phenomenon in the same year.
On 21 December 2005, AD and YB visited a farm in
Jodiya village, Jamnagar district, Gujarat, and observed
a Black-necked Stork nest on a ‘neem’ Azadirachta indica
tree. The nest had four nearly fledged nestlings (Plate 1 ) .
One week later, the farmers informed YB that all four
nestlings had fledged from the nest. Subsequently, AD
and YB visited the site and observed all four fledged
juveniles. This nest was likely initiated in October 2005
(calculated following Sundar 2003). Neem trees were
previously unknown as a nesting tree for this species (see
Sundar 2003).
On 28 January 2006, an adult Black-necked Stork was
observed with four newly fledged juveniles in Hadayi
Malawaan Wetland, Etah district, Uttar Pradesh by SPN.
The nest site for this family could not be found and
the subsequent fate of the four juveniles is not known.
The nest was likely initiated in October or November
2005.
On 20 March 2005, a pair of adult Black-necked Storks
with four newly fledged young was seen resting in a wheat
field beside Kurra village, Mainpuri district, Uttar Pradesh
by KSGS (Plate 2) . The adult pair is known to be resident
in the area; they raised chicks only once between 1999
and 2002 (Sundar 2003, KSGS unpublished data). The
four young are likely to have fledged from a nest initiated
in December 2005 or January 2006.
All three nests were clearly initiated during or
immediately after the monsoon, as is consistent with
earlier observations (Ishtiaq 1998, Sundar 2003), in the
breeding season of 2005-2006. In 2005, rainfall in all
three areas was delayed, with most of it occurring in
September instead of being spread between July and
October. Such concentration of rainfall may lead to the
formation of temporarily larger wetlands. This may lead
to temporary food abundance, and may have permitted
the storks to provision more chicks than usual. The three
records are geographically well spaced, hinting that
breeding pairs all over the country can potentially raise
four chicks if appropriate conditions are available. This
species is naturally rare in the countryside in India,
mostly living in areas that are not visited regularly by
birdwatchers or biologists, and with most pairs and
families scattered in the countryside away from the
wetlands where intensive waterfowl counts are made
(Rahmani 1989, Sundar 2004). More consistent
observations on identified pairs will provide improved
information on nesting success and on why so few nesting
attempts result in the fledging of four chicks. This
information may assist in captive breeding attempts and
in understanding the ecology of a species that is declining
rapidly in the Indian landscape.
162
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Plate 1. Four Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus chicks at the nest in Jodiya, Gujarat, India, on 21 December 2005.
Plate 2. Four Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus chicks at Kurra village, Mainpuri district, Uttar Pradesh, India, on 20 March 2005.
A pair of adults was present nearby.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
163
Among the large storks that nest singly, the maximum
number of fledglings recorded is three, with one
exceptional record of a Jabiru Jabiru mycteria nest with
five chicks fledging (Thomas 1981) and one record of
four Black-necked Stork chicks fledging in Australia,
where the species has been well studied (D. Richards in
litt. 2006). There are no records of four Black-necked
Stork chicks fledging from a single nest in South-East
Asia, where the species is sparsely but widely distributed
(J. Barzen, T. Clements, W. Duckworth, T. Evans and R.
Timmins in litt. 2005).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
KSGS thanks R. Chauhan, R. Kirby, S. Sinclair and T. Sinclair for
their company during the observation in Mainpuri district, and G.
Clancy and D. Richards for information from Australia. AD and YB
thank the farmers for information on the nest of the Black-necked Stork
injodiya. SPN thanks SACON and S. N. Prasad for facilities under the
project ‘Structural and functional attributes of the wetlands in Indo-
Gangetic Plains of India with reference to Uttar Pradesh’, and
S. Chauhan for his company during the observation at Etah district.
REFERENCES
Ishtiaq, F. (1998) Comparative ecology and behaviour of storks in
Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan, India. PhD. thesis, Centre
of Wildlife and Ornithology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh,
India.
Maheswaran, G. (1998) Ecology and behaviour of Black-necked
Stork ( Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Latham, 1790) in Dudwa
National Park, Uttar Pradesh. Ph.D. thesis. Centre of Wildlife
and Ornithology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Rahmani, A. R. (1989) Status of the Black-necked Stork
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in India. Forktail 5: 99-1 10.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2003) Notes on the breeding biology of the Black¬
necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Etawah and Mainpuri
districts, Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 15-20.
Sundar, K. S. G. (2004) Effectiveness of road transects and wetland
visits for surveying Black-necked Storks Ephippiorhynchus
asiaticus and Sarus Cranes Grus antigone in India. Forktail 21:
27-32.
Thomas, B. T. (1981) Jabiru nests, nest building and quintuplets.
Condor 83: 84-85.
K. S. Gopi Sundar, Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group, c/o International Crane Foundation, E-11376, Shady
Lane Road, Baraboo, WI-53913, U.S.A. anddo Wildlife Protection Society of India, S-25, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi
110 017, India. Email: gopi@savingcranes.org
Arpit Deomurari, ‘AVANI’, Anand Colony, Rd. no. 1, Nr. ‘ Gurukrupa ’, Vikasgruh Road, Jamnagar 361 008, Gujarat,
India.
Yashodan Bhatia, do. Bhatia Stores, Nr Teen Batti, Jamnagar 361 008, Gujarat, India.
S. Prasanth Narayanan, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty Post, Coimbatore 641 108, Tamil
Nadu, India.
A recent record of Storm’s Stork Ciconia stormi
in Thailand
PETER CUTTER, PASSANAN BOONTUA and KRIANGSAK SRI-BUAROD
Storm’s Stork Ciconia stormi is one of the rarest species of
storks in the world and very little is known of its natural
history (Luthin 1987, BirdLife International 2001,
Wetlands International 2006). The species is classified as
Endangered due to its small (250-500 individuals) and
rapidly declining population, caused primarily by the
destruction or conversion of its preferred lowland
evergreen forest habitat (BirdLife International 2001,
Wetlands International 2006).
In this note we report the first sighting of this species
in Thailand for 18 years. The observation was made on
3 April 2004 by an infrared camera trap device (placed at
c. 1 00 m above sea level at c.9° 1 0'N 98°40'E) within Klong
Saeng Wildlife Sanctuary in Surat Thani province.
Most observations of the species come from Borneo
where individuals and small groups have been sighted
alongside rivers in forested areas, but it also occurs in
peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra (Luthin 1987, BirdLife
International 2001). There is only one previous record
from Thailand, where a nesting pair with chicks was
observed in detail in a lowland evergreen forest area (at
c.9°05'N 98°30'E, 69 m) during September/October 1 986
(Nakhasathien 1987). Recent range-wide assessments
have suggested that the species is probably extinct in
Thailand (BirdLife International 200 1 , Bird Conservation
Society of Thailand 2004).
METHODS
The record was made during a camera-trap survey for
fishing cat Prionailurus viverrinus in a remote area of Surat
Thani province in southern Thailand. The survey used
six passive infrared-triggered camera traps which were
rotated among several evergreen forest sites along the
banks of smaller streams and lakes surrounding the
164
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Plate 1. Storm’s Stork Ciconia stormi recorded on 3 April 2004 at
Klong Saeng Wildlife Sanctuary in Surat Thani province, Thailand.
Ratchaprapa (formerly ChiewLarn) Reservoir in Khlong
Saeng Wildlife Sanctuary. The survey resulted in a total
of 528 camera trap-days during January-April 2004 (see
Boontua 2004 for further details).
Created in 1987-1988, the Ratchaprapa Reservoir
flooded an area of approximately 1 65 km2 of what, at the
time, was one of South-East Asia’s most pristine lowland
evergreen forest areas and the only extensive lowland
valley-bottom protected forest habitat in peninsular
Thailand (Nakhasathien 1987). The extensive reservoir
now falls within the boundaries of Klong Saeng Wildlife
Sanctuary and Khao Sok National Park — both part of the
c.4,285 km3 Khao Sok protected area cluster, spanning
Surat Thani, Chumpon, Phangnga, and Ranong
provinces, Southern Thailand.
OBSERVATIONS
One camera, active at a single site for a period of 24 days,
recorded four pictures of at least two Storm’s Storks on
3 April 2004 (Plate 1). The camera was set in a relatively
open area along a seasonal stream draining into the large
Khlong Ya branch of the Chiew Larn Reservoir. One
individual was photographed in a wing-droop spread¬
wing position (see Kahl 1971 for nomenclature).
Photographed birds were standing on the pebbly part of
the river out of the water.
DISCUSSION
The single detection despite the high intensity of sampling
in potential habitat underscores the rarity of Storm’s Storks
in the region. Although the species has also recently been
detected in the Thanintharyi division of Myanmar (J.
Eames in litt. 2006), the prospect of finding this species
elsewhere in Thailand is highly unlikely given that there
is almost certainly no other remaining site in the country
that holds sufficient lowland forest habitat to support this
species. This record thus highlights the great conservation
significance of the Khao Sok-Klong Saeng Forest
Complex.
Throughout the entire Sunda subregion, lowland valley
bottom forests are being converted at an escalating rate,
threatening this stork and other species dependent on
this habitat. Other globally threatened species that occur
within the Klong Saeng-Khao Sok forest complex include
birds such as Masked Finfoot Heliopais personata,
Wallace’s Hawk Eagle Spizaetus nanus and Blue-banded
Kingfisher Alcedo euryzona , and mammals such as tiger
Panthera tigris, Malayan tapir Tapirus indicus, and Asian
elephant Elephas maximus.
The photographs document an open-winged posture
which has not been described previously for this species
(Kahl 1971). This reflects one of the benefits of remote
camera-traps that can capture behaviour that might
otherwise be difficult to observe.
Specific threats to the site of this observation (and
indeed to much of the entire Klong Saeng-Khao Sok forest
complex) include illegal hunting, trapping and fishing,
collection of non-timber forest products, and dramatic
changes in vegetation structure brought about by the
construction of the reservoir as well as the sometimes
large water level fluctuations that occur at the margin of
the reservoir and the surrounding forest (Nakhasathien
1987, 1989). These patterns have likely increased since
the dam was built as the reservoir provides easy access to
remote areas. Overall human traffic continues to increase
due in part to the construction of numerous floating tourism
bases. Additionally, there are now plans for a road through
the northern region of the complex (Bangkok Post 2006) .
Given that this record opens the possibility that a small
breeding population is still present at this locality, targeted
survey efforts for the species and nest sites should be a
priority, and special protection measures should be
implemented at any confirmed nest sites. More generally,
increased protection and monitoring efforts are needed
to conserve the natural communities of the Klong Saeng-
Khao Sok Forest Complex as a whole, especially the
extremely limited lower evergreen areas around the Chiew
Larn Reservoir. Designation of the area as one of
Thailand’s Important Bird Areas should also be
considered in light of this highly significant record and
the other globally threatened birds that occur at the site.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for these surveys was provided by the Cincinnati Zoo and
Smithsonian Institution. We are grateful to Thailand’s National Park,
Wildlife, and Plant Conservation Department who facilitated the
surveys. Thanks also to Philip Round and K. S. Gopi Sundar for
reviewing earlier drafts of this report.
REFERENCES
Bangkok Post (2006) Parks staff to probe road project. Bangkok, Thailand,
7 July 2006.
Bird Conservation Society of Thailand (2004) Directory of Important
Bird Areas in the Kingdom of Thailand. Bangkok: Bird Conservation
Society of Thailand and BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: The BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
165
Boontua, P. (2004) Preliminary Surveys for Fishing Cat ( Prionailurus
viverrinus ) in Thailand: Interim Report: December 2003-April
2004. Page 13. Unpublished report to the Wildlife Research
Division, National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation
Department, Thailand and the Smithsonian Institution’s National
Zoological Park.
Kahl, M. P. (1971) Spread-wing postures and their possible functions
in the Ciconiidae. Auk 88: 715-722.
Luthin, C. S. (1987) Status of and conservation priorities for the world’s
stork species. Colonial Waterbirds 10: 181-202.
Nakhasathien, S. (1987) The discovery of Storm’s Stork Ciconia stormi
in Thailand. Forktail 3: 43-49.
Nakhasathien, S. (1989) Chiew Lam Dam wildlife rescue operation.
Oryx 23: 146-154.
Wetlands International (2006) Waterbird population estimates. Fourth
edition. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International.
Peter Cutter, University of Minnesota Conservation Biology Graduate Program, 200 Hodson Hall, 1 980 Folwell Avenue, St.
Paul, MN 55108. Email: peter@conservationasia.org
Passanan Boontua, 77/24 Moo 1, Preuksagan 1, Lad Yah Road, Kanjanaburi 71000, Thailand. Email:
namfon@conservationasia.org
Kriangsak Sri-buarod, Klong Saeng Research Center, Klongsaeng Widlife Sanctuary, Surat-thani 82150, Thailand.
Observations of unusual clutch size, renesting and
egg concealment by Sarus Cranes Grus antigone
in Gujarat, India
KANDARP KATHJU
Detailed studies on the nesting behaviour of Sarus Cranes
Grus antigone are few. Two notable exceptions are a study
in Gujarat (Mukherjee 1999) and another in Uttar Pradesh
(Sundar and Choudhury 2003, 2005), both in India. Here
I detail observations of a nest with an unusually large
clutch size, and of re-nesting and apparent egg
concealment by Sarus Cranes in Gujarat.
STUDY AREA AND METHODS
Observations on breeding pairs of Sarus Cranes were
carried out in Sanand, Kalol and Kadi sub-districts of
Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar and Mahesana districts (23°N
73°E), Gujarat state, India during 1998-2005. The study
area was c.40 km north-west of Ahmedabad city; most of
it was accessible by road or dirt tracks, and the area
contained >25 villages.
Sarus Cranes used flooded rice paddies and
monsoon-fed ponds and marshes in the area, and bred
only during the rainy season (July-October). Birds were
not individually marked, but breeding crane pairs could
be distinguished by their territorial behaviour, and
appeared to be faithful to nesting sites each year, as is
consistent with Sarus Crane behaviour elsewhere (K.S.G.
Sundar in litt. 2006). Sexes were differentiated by size
(males being larger) following Sundar and Choudhury
(2003). Observations of breeding pairs were made
during periodic visits to nesting sites (mostly on foot).
Selected nests were observed twice a week and in some
cases daily during egg-laying and incubation. Local
farmers at several nest sites were asked not to disturb
nesting birds.
RESULTS
Clutch size
One nest in 2005 near Thol village had a clutch size of
three eggs. The third egg was laid on 8 August, six days
after the second: it was distinguished by its strikingly
fresh, chalky white appearance that contrasted markedly
with the dirtier hues of the first two eggs. It remained
light-coloured until the end of incubation. One of the
first two eggs hatched on 4 September followed by the
third-laid egg on 6 September. On 8 September, the adults
and the two chicks were seen foraging together away from
the nest, leaving the remaining egg unattended. Close
inspection of the unhatched egg on 1 1 September showed
that it was addled; it cracked when handled, spilling the
stinking fluid contents.
Distraction and egg-concealment behaviour
I approached the nest with three eggs 1 1 times during
incubation. On each occasion, the incubating adult gave
a display apparently to lure me away from the nest. This
consisted of the bird pacing agitatedly in a semi-crouching
gait, followed by opening and drooping a wing and then
plucking vegetation and tossing it around. On three
occasions, the incubating bird then returned to the nest
and appeared to attempt to conceal the eggs by pulling
out vegetation from the edge of the nest and placing it
over the eggs in the centre (Plate 1). They did this when
I was 1 5-20 m from the nest. The bird resumed incubation
once I was out of sight.
Renesting
At least 15 of 73 nests (21%) monitored during 2002-
166
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
2005 were second nests during the same season by the
pairs involved. In most cases, the first nests had been
destroyed by flooding, with three nests abandoned owing
to human disturbance. Exceptionally, a resident pair at
Nandoli village was observed nesting three times during
the 2005 breeding season, with two-egg clutches each
time. The pair re-used a 2004 nest site, and laid its first
clutch on c.29 July 2005. Heavy rains in the second week
of August washed away the nest and eggs. The pair built
a new nest c. 15-20 m away on a dyke between two
paddyfields, and laid a second clutch on c.20 August.
This clutch was accidentally destroyed by a farmer. A
third nest was then built 70 m from the second in a flooded
fallow field, and the female had laid two more eggs by 26
August. One egg hatched on 29 September and the chick
fledged successfully, while the fate of the second egg
remained unknown.
DISCUSSION
Clutch size
The most frequent clutch size of Sarus Cranes is two,
with one-egg clutches also known (Meine and Archibald
1996). Three-egg clutches have been recorded in
Keoladeo-Ghana National Park, Rajasthan (Walkinshaw
1973), and suspected in Gujarat (Mukherjee 1999), and
one nest with four eggs was recorded in Etawah-Mainpuri
districts, Uttar Pradesh (Sundar and Choudhury 2005).
In the case of the three-egg clutch I recorded, it is unlikely
that the additional egg was laid by an intruding bird
parasitising the nest: no other individual was seen during
my visits, Sarus Cranes are highly territorial, and nest
parasitism has not been documented for any crane
species.
Although the third egg was laid six days after the
second, it hatched just two days after the first chick
Plate la and b. Sarus Crane Gms antigone placing vegetation over its
emerged. However, this is within the variation known for
the species: intervals of 1-8 days between egg-laying, and
incubation periods of 26-35 days have been recorded (K.
S. G. Sundar in litt. 2006).
Sarus Cranes do not usually eject addled eggs, and
may continue to incubate them for over 40 days (Sundar
and Choudhury 2003). In the nest I observed, it is likely
that the unhatched egg was abandoned soon after the two
chicks had hatched: they were seen with the adults c.40
m from the nest two days after the second egg had hatched.
Egg-concealment behaviour
Neither wild nor captive cranes have been previously
recorded concealing eggs from potential predators (Ellis
et al. 1996, Meine and Archibald 1996), although such
behaviour is known in other species e.g. grebes, tinamous,
Least Seedsnipe Thinocoms rumicivorus , White-fronted
Plover Charadrius marginatus, Common Eider Somateria
mollissima, etc. (Welty and Baptista 1988). In my
observation of Sarus Crane, it is unlikely that vegetation
was used to keep the eggs warm (a conceivable alternative
explanation) since the behaviour was only seen in response
to the approach of humans to the nest. The principal
cause of loss of eggs in previous studies of Sarus Crane is
known to be humans (Mukherjee 1 999). However, in my
study area, flooding was the most important cause of egg
loss with only three instances (4.1% of 7 3 nests) of humans
taking or destroying the eggs. Egg-concealment behaviour
might therefore be expected (and perhaps more
frequently) in other populations of Sarus Crane that suffer
higher egg-losses to predators.
Renesting
Although renesting is known to occur in most crane species
(Meine and Archibald 1996), and in Sarus Cranes in
Gujarat (Mukherjee 1999), there are very few detailed
records. Producing three clutches in a season has rarely
;gs to conceal them, September 2005, Thol village, Gujarat, India.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
167
been documented (K. S. G. Sundar in litt. 2006). The
case I observed was probably facilitated by the destruction
of the second clutch early in incubation, and the heavier
than normal rains in September 2005 that gave the pair
sufficient time to nest for a third time. In captivity, cranes
can be induced to lay up to eleven clutches in a row by
removing eggs from the nest (Ellis et al. 1996). Cranes
have been documented to re-nest only if the eggs or nest
are lost, but there have been no records of successful re¬
nesting once the eggs have hatched.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank the Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group for references,
and George Archibald and Gopi Sundar for comments on a previous
draft of the paper.
REFERENCES
Ellis, D. H., Gee, G. F. and Mirande, C. M. (1996) Cranes: their
biology, husbandry and conservation. Baraboo, WI, U.S.A.: National
Biological Service/International Crane Foundation.
Meine, C. D. and Archibald, G. W. (1996) Cranes: status survey and
conservation action plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.:
IUCN.
Mukherjee, A. ( 1 999) Ecological study on the Saras Crane Grus antigone
in the central Gujarat. Ph.D. thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot,
India.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2003) Nest sanitation in Saras
Cranes Grus antigone in Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 144-146.
Sundar, K. S. G. and Choudhury, B. C. (2005) Effect of incubating
adult sex and clutch size on egg-orientation in Saras Crane Grus
antigone. Forktail 21: 179-181.
Walkinshaw, L. H. (1973) Cranes of the world. New York: Winchester
Press.
Welty, J. C. and Baptista, L. (1988) The life of birds. New York: Saunders
College.
Kandarp Kathju, 10 Sarathi Society, Gurukul Road, Memnagar, Ahmedabad 380 052, Gujarat, India.
Email: kkathju@gmail. corn
Greater Spotted Eagles Aquila clanga
in central Thailand
MARK MALLALIEU
Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga breeds from eastern
Europe to China, and winters from Europe, central and
east Africa, across the Middle East to Japan and south to
Malaysia and Sumatra in Indonesia. It typically breeds in
lowland forests near wetlands . On migration and in winter
it occurs in a wide variety of lowland open habitats,
particularly wetlands. The global population has been
estimated at no more than 1 0,000 birds and is thought to
be declining mainly as a result of habitat destruction,
disturbance and hunting, so that the species is classified
as Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2001, Meyburg et
al. 2001). Within Thailand it is an annual winter visitor
and passage migrant between October and April.
The wintering population in Thailand has been
estimated at 10-100 birds, occurring primarily in the
lower central plains (BirdLife International 2001),
although the actual numbers observed in recent years
prior to 2003 have been in single figures (e.g. Round and
Jukmongkol 2001-2002). Since 2003, there has been a
significant rise in numbers recorded in central Thailand
as a result of fieldwork that has led to greater awareness
of habitat preferences and roosting behaviour. I present
here information on Greater Spotted Eagle in Thailand
based mainly on observations I made in 2003-2004.
METHODS
I made field observations of Greater Spotted Eagles in
central Thailand during November 2003-March 2004,
spending 26 days looking for the species in the lower and
upper central plains and in the northern part of the peninsula
(Fig. 1), covering the provinces of Phetchaburi,
Chachoengsao, Prachinburi, Nakhon Sawan, Ayutthaya,
Chainat, Lopburi, Saraburi and Prachuap Khiri Khan. A
vehicle was used to cover large areas and locate potentially
suitable sites, which were then searched using minor roads
and tracks, with frequent stops to scan the sky, trees and
ground. At the most-visited location (Khao Yoi),
photographs of individuals helped to estimate the minimum
number of birds using the site. Elsewhere, notes on plumage
differences between individual birds also helped to estimate
the minimum number of birds using a single site. When
possible, individuals were aged using criteria in Forsman
(1999). Notes were taken of any crops being grown at the
time of each visit, including in areas not holding Greater
Spotted Eagles. A one-day follow-up visit to Phanom
Sarakham-Sri Mahosot was made in December 2005.
RESULTS
During November 2003-March 2004, Greater Spotted
Eagles were found at six sites (Table 1). There were 117
sightings, but the actual number of individuals was likely
much lower than this figure.
Habitat preferences
Greater Spotted Eagles wintered in large expanses of rice
fields, which they occupied from harvest time to the
168
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
beginning of the next cultivation phase. These areas had
scattered trees and occasional small copses, minor
irrigation canals, a few small human settlements confined
to the edges of widely separated sealed roads, and dirt
tracks to allow access by machinery for ploughing and
harvesting. Almost all were cultivated under an irrigated
one- or two-crop regime, which leaves stubbles for about
three months in the dry season between December and
March (with local variations in the timing of cultivation
phases) . All sites were within 1 0 km of areas of fishponds
or other wetlands.
Movements and seasonality
During November 2003-March 2004, the first Greater
Spotted Eagles were seen on 8 November. At Khao Yoi,
an influx at the end of November or early December,
coincided with the rice harvest, as at least nine birds were
seen on 6 December 2003, where none had been present
on 2 1 November. Evidence of movements was provided
by a sequence of counts around a roost site in Sri Mahosot.
Here counts of 8-1 1 birds during visits between 8 February
Figure 1 . Map of central Thailand showing sites where Greater Spotted
Eagles were found during November 2003-March 2004. Broken line
shows boundary of survey area. Site numbers correspond to those in
Table 1.
and 3 March declined to 2-4 birds on 13 and 17 March,
and only one on 27 March, the final day of observations
at this site. Two Greater Spotted Eagles remained at single
sites for more than three weeks: at Khao Yoi, the same
adult (identified by wing moult pattern) was observed on
7 and 31 January 2004, while near Sri Mahosot, a
distinctive fulvescens form of Greater Spotted Eagle was
seen on 8 and 18 February, and 3 March 2004.
Roosting behaviour
At one site, Ban Thung Sawang, at least 1 1 birds gathered
in an area of about 1 km2, roosting in trees growing along
the edges of fallow rice fields within 3 km of a small
village. Near Sri Mahosot, up to ten birds roosted close
to (possibly among) Black Kites Milvus migrans in
woodland among extensive cassava plantations c.4 km
from the nearest suitable hunting areas. This site held
253 Black Kites on 17 March 2004 and 520 on 30
December 2005 . At Khao Y oi, there was a more dispersed
pattern, with the eagles typically roosting singly in isolated
trees in fallow rice fields, not usually in close proximity
(though two Greater Spotted Eagles were seen roosting
together on one occasion, along with an Imperial Eagle
Aquila heliaca or Steppe Eagle A. nipalensis).
Age profile
Using criteria in Forsman (1999) c.36% of aged birds
were thought to be adults or near-adults (fourth calendar
year or older), 30-36% were immatures (>1 year old),
and 28-34% were juveniles (some non-adult birds were
too distant to distinguish between juvenile and immature) .
Two fulvescens- type birds were seen.
DISCUSSION
My observations were made over an extended period of
nearly five months, which overlapped both migration
periods and therefore cannot be used to estimate
accurately the number of Greater Spotted Eagles over¬
wintering in central Thailand. However, I counted a total
of 24 birds during a five-day period between 28 February
2004 and 3 March 2004 at five sites (rows 2-6 in Table
1). Based on the estimated total area of these sites, this
would suggest a density of about 4.4 birds per 100 km2.
My fieldwork and study of maps suggests that only a few
areas still suitable for Greater Spotted Eagles in the lower
central plains could have been missed. Subsequent to my
observations, there have been numerous further records
Table 1. Counts of Greater Spotted Eagles in central Thailand, November 2003-March 2004. Site numbers correspond to those in Fig. 1.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
169
of wintering Greater Spotted Eagles in central Thailand,
which confirm the importance of sites 1 , 2 and 4 in "fable
1 (Round and Jukmongkol 2005, Round and Jukmongkol
2006a, b, C. Kaesorndorkbua in litt. 2006).
Other sites holding Greater Spotted Eagles may exist
in the upper central plains (Northern region) . The North¬
eastern region, where there are large areas of seasonally
dry rice fields and a small number of major wetlands
(Wolstencroft et al. 1993), may also hold some birds.
There are a number of previous records from this region
including two birds in Chaiyaphum province in February
2005 (BirdLife International 2001, Round and
Jukmongkol 2005), but large tracts are probably too arid
to provide suitable over-wintering habitat (personal
observations). The Lake Songkhla basin, in the south of
the country, and perhaps some low-lying parts of Eastern
region might also hold some birds. There are no known
regular over-wintering sites anywhere in Thailand not
covered by my fieldwork (from recent reports in Bird
Conserv. Soc. Thai. Bull, since 1998, plus BirdLife
International 2001). Migrant Greater Spotted Eagles are
regularly reported in very small numbers from the
Chumphon raptor migration watch site in the Thai
peninsula (e.g. DeCandido et al. 2004).
I obtained very limited information on prey. Rodents
may well be important, given their abundance in rice
fields. At fish ponds near Khao Yoi, five Greater Spotted
Eagles were seen scavenging dead fish on a newly drained
pond in January 2003 (Round and Jukmongkol 2003). I
saw birds in the same area on several occasions in February
and March 2003, sometimes flying up from inaccessible
(to me) locations in the company of Black Kites, almost
certainly having scavenged dead or dying fish from drained
ponds. I observed attempted kleptoparasitism by Greater
Spotted Eagles on three occasions, once on an Osprey
Pandion haliaetus and twice on an Eastern Marsh Harrier
Circus spilonotus. At most sites, flocks of several hundred
flightless domestic ducks were present in stubble fields.
Although these flocks were tended by farm workers and
were never harassed by the eagles, some ducks became
separated and were then vulnerable: a Greater Spotted
Eagle was seen feeding on a domestic duck at one site. In
March 2005, two Greater Spotted Eagles in Phetchaburi
province fed on the carcases of Lesser Whistling-ducks
Dendrocygna javanica apparently killed by poison intended
to destroy snails (Round and Jukmongkol 2005). I found
no evidence of direct persecution of Greater Spotted
Eagles (or other birds of prey) by people, although
persecution of eagles has been noted in Thailand in the
past (BirdLife International 2001).
In recent years, rapid changes in the pattern of dry
season cropping of rice, together with creeping
urbanisation, have dramatically reduced the areas of
habitat suitable for Greater Spotted Eagles in the central
plains. These changes in cultivation patterns involve
planting of a third annual crop and/or earlier planting of
dry season crops (Molle et al. 2001). There are very short
fallow periods, which may temporarily attract some eagles.
However, the uniform expanses of growing crops during
much of the over-wintering period do not hold Greater
Spotted Eagles, although birds may be present where
there is a patchwork of growing crops, stubbles and
fishponds or other wetlands. The main short to medium-
term threats to Greater Spotted Eagles in central Thailand
are probably further expansion in these cropping patterns
and urbanisation. For example, in December 2005, there
were large expanses of irrigated young rice growing in the
Phanom Sarakham-Sri Mahosot area (site 2 in Table 1)
where there had been only dry stubbles in early 2004.
Rodenticides and other poisons may be a cause of
mortality in Greater Spotted Eagles and other birds of
prey in Thailand. Although this survey did not attempt to
assess the extent of use of rodenticides, these are used and
are known to have poisoned birds of prey in oil palm
plantations in Thailand (Anon. 1 9 9 8) . In Malaysia, Aquila
spp. eagles have been observed feeding on poisoned rats
(Wells 1999). In Shanxi province, China, studies of
Greater Spotted Eagles over-wintering in Shanxi Lishan
National Nature Reserve during 1991-1995 found that
predation on poisoned Common Pheasants Phasianus
colchicus was a major cause of mortality (Qingxia 1996).
Although the species is nominally protected under
Thai law, there are no significant numbers of Greater
Spotted Eagles in any existing national park or wildlife
sanctuary. No extensive wetland or other suitable lowland
area is fully protected as a nature reserve, and therefore
the outlook is not good if the present trend towards
increased dry-season cropping continues. Other birds of
prey may also be affected, including the Vulnerable
Imperial Eagle, nine of which were seen during my
fieldwork.
Future studies of Greater Spotted Eagles in Thailand
should aim to locate roosting sites to reduce the risk of
underestimating the numbers of over-wintering birds.
Pellet analysis would provide useful information on prey
species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Phil Round for his generous advice and encouragement during
the writing of this paper. I am most grateful also to Colin Poole,
Will Duckworth and Stephen Browne for their comments on earlier
drafts, and to Michael Rank for assistance in translating a paper from
Chinese.
REFERENCES
Anon. (1998) Rodent management in Thailand. Commonwealth Scientific
and Industrial Research Organisation Division of Wildlife and Ecology
Newsletter 5 March 1998.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
DeCandido, R., Nualsri, C., Allen, D. and Bildstein, K. L. (2004)
Autumn 2003 raptor migration at Chumphon, Thailand: a globally
significant migration watch site. Forktail 20: 49-54
Forsman, D. (1999) The raptors of Europe and the Middle East. London:
T. & A. D. Poyser.
Meyburg, B.-U., Haraszthy, L., Strazds, M. and Schaffer, N. (2001)
European Species Action Plan for Greater Spotted Eagle ( Aquila
clanga). Pp. 1-16 in N. Schaffer and U. Gallo-Orsi. European Union
action plans for eight priority bird species. Luxembourg: Office for
Official Publications of the European Communities.
Molle, F., Chompadist, C., Srijantr, T. and Keawkulaya, J. (2001)
Dry-season water allocation in the Chao Phraya Delta. Bangkok:
Kasetsart University, DORAS Center. (Research Report no. 8).
Qingxia, Z. (1996) Winter ecology of Aquila clanga in Lishan Nature
Reserve. Sichuan J. Zool. 15: 170-172. (In Chinese).
170
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol R. (2001-2002) Recent reports. Bird
Consent. Soc. Thai. Bull. 18(6): 14, 19(1): 13, 19(12): 14.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol R. (2003) Recent reports. Bird Consent.
Soc. Thai. Bull. 20(4): 16.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol R. (2005) Recent reports. BirdConserv.
Soc. Thai. Bull. 20(4): 17-20.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol R. (2006a) Recent reports. Bird Consent.
Soc. Thai. Bull. 23(2): 15-19.
Round, P. D. and Jukmongkol R. (2006b) Recent reports. BirdConserv.
Soc. Thai. Bull. 23(3): 18-19.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula , Vol. 1.
London: Academic Press.
Wolstencroft, J., Parr, J. and Goodey, M. (1993). Survey of wetlands in
north-east Thailand. Kuala Lumpur: Asian Wetlands Bureau.
(Publication no. 83).
Mark Mallalieu, 29 Cobbetts Mead, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH163TQ, JJ.K. Email: markpatl23@btintemet.com
Infanticide-cannibalism in the Oriental Pied
Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris
Y. H. CHAN, M. ZAFIRAH, M. CREMADES, M. DIVET, C. H. R.TEO and S. C. NG
We report here infanticide followed by cannibalism in
Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris , which to
our knowledge has not been previously been reported in
hornbills.
In December 2005-January 2006, video cameras were
placed in four Oriental Pied Hornbill nest cavities (before
they were occupied), in the forests of Pulau Ubin, an
island off Singapore, as part of the Singapore Hornbill
Project. Pulau Ubin (1°24'N 1 03°58'E) lies in the Straits
of Johor, north-east of the main island of Singapore; it is
8 km in length and 1 . 3- 1 . 7 km in breadth and has an area
of 10.2 km2. The habitat is mainly mixed secondary forest
with old fruit plantations, primarily durian Durio
zibethinus. The nest trees were 0.6-2. 7 km apart, at an
altitude of 1-5 m. The cavity openings were 7-12.1 m
above the ground.
METHODS
Three CCTV cameras with infra-red capabilities were
positioned at each nest: one inside the nest cavity, one at
the nest entrance and one 5-1 0 m away. A DVD recorder,
portable 12V 120AH batteries, inverter and monitor
powered by 12V 80AH batteries were connected to the
cameras. Images from all cameras were recorded 24 hours
daily by a digital video recorder running the Telexper
programme (Telexper International Inc, California,
U.S. A.) . Data were transferred fortnightly to external hard
disks for storage. Data were reviewed and analysed daily,
with the timing of events noted directly from the recordings .
Dimensions (e.g. egg size and beak length) were
obtained by measuring the images and multiplying by the
relevant magnification factor. Magnification factors were
derived from an image of a reference object (a ruler placed
inside the nest cavity) . Parallax effects were minimised by
taking the measurements at the bottom of the nest.
OBSERVATIONS
Three of the nests were subsequently occupied by females.
The female in the first nest first entered the nest cavity on
27 December 2005, and she was sealed in by both her
mate and herself on 4 January 2006. She laid four eggs,
with the first on 10 January and the others at 3-4 day
intervals. The nestlings hatched on 6-16 February, 28-
29 days after the eggs were laid. The male brought food
to the nest up to 3 1 times a day during the nesting period.
During the 1 5 days from the hatching of the first chick to
the death of the fourth chick, the items brought by the
male comprised 50% fruits, 40% insects and 1 0% lizards.
The duration of visits by the male ranged from 30 seconds
to three minutes, depending on the size and amount of
food.
All the chicks positioned themselves just under the
opening through which the male brought the food,3vhich
was distributed whole by the female to the chicks. Visual
estimations of the food intake by the individual chicks
over these 1 5 days indicated that the food mass received
by each of the eldest three chicks was similar. During
individual feeding visits, chicks that were satiated did not
fight for food as much as the hungrier chicks, and the
female appeared to distribute food to the chicks that
begged most vigorously.
The fourth (youngest) chick appeared to receive much
less food than the other three chicks (Fig. 1 a) and it looked
much smaller and weaker. Whereas the mean feeding
frequency of the three larger chicks during their first four
days was 17.4 times a day, the fourth chick received just
eight feeds on its second day after hatching and three on
its fourth day. The three older chicks grew steadily and at
similar rates (Fig. lb), but the fourth appeared to stop
growing after its second day.
On the fourth day after hatching, the fourth chick
ceased giving begging calls (although it continued gaping) .
At 15h59, the female picked up the fourth chick and
killed it by repeatedly crushing it with her beak. Then she
tried to feed it to the remaining chicks. All three chicks
attempted to swallow it, and after 30 minutes the second
oldest chick succeeded (Plate 1).
We recorded the disappearance of a fourth-hatched
chick in another nest, but unfortunately the battery failed
at the critical time and we were unable to obtain a video
recording. In this nest the female sealed herself into the
nest on 5 February 2006. The first egg was laid on 12
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
171
(a)
■ 1st chick 02nd chick D3rd chick H4th chick
Date
(b)
Figure 1 . Feeding frequency (a) and
growth rate (b) for the four chicks.
February, and the fourth egg was laid on 20 February.
The first egg hatched on 1 2 March, and the fourth hatched
on 18 March. The fourth chick disappeared four days
after it hatched. The last recording before the batteries
failed at 06h54 on 22 March revealed four chicks. When
the recording restarted at 1 lh02, there were only three
chicks left. No remains of the chick were seen in the nest
or on the ground outside. We presume that the female
killed the chick and ate it or fed it to the other chicks.
There were only two eggs in the third occupied nest cavity.
DISCUSSION
Although four eggs in a clutch have been recorded in
captivity, it has been generally assumed from observations
of fledglings in the wild that the largest clutches of Oriental
Pied Flornbills are of three eggs (Kemp 1995). Our study
is the first in which nest interiors in the wild have been
monitored continuously. It shows that four-egg clutches
may not be uncommon. This is supported by another
study in which nests of a number of hornbill species
(including Oriental Pied Hornbill) were examined daily,
and unexplained chick losses were observed (P. Poonswad
in litt. 2006).
We hypothesise that the female committed infanticide
of the youngest chick and fed it to the other chicks to
improve their chance of survival. As the frequency of
feeding appeared to be high, we do not believe that a
dearth in food supply was the main factor behind this
behaviour. Infanticide has also been reported in House
Sparrow Passer domesticus (Veiga 2003), Barn Swallow
Hirundo rusrica (Moller 2004), European Starling Sturnus
vulgaris (Smith era/. 1996) and Guira Cuckoo Guira guira
(Macedo and Bianchi 1997) among other species.
Siblicide amongst chicks is also well-known, for example
in the Nazca Booby Sula grand (Clifford and Anderson
2002) and Madagascar Fish Eagle Haliaeetus vociferoides
(Watson et al. 1999). In obligately siblicidal bird species
(such as boobies Sula spp.), aggressive behaviour by a
dominant chick typically reduces the brood size to one.
Facultative siblicide has been documented in several
172
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Plate 1. Sequence of video images of the infanticide and cannibalism event: (A) adult female feeding chicks (fourth chick circled at bottom of image);
(B) female picking up the fourth chick (circled); (C) female killing fourth chick by shaking and crushing it in her beak; (D) remaining chicks reacting
to dying chick (circled) with reflex begging; (E) largest chick trying to swallow dead chick (circled); (F) all three chicks trying to swallow dead chick;
(G) third chick trying to swallow dead chick (circled); (H) second chick with enlarged food pouch (circled) having eaten dead chick.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
173
raptor species; for example, observations indicate a
relationship between food resources and brood reduction
in Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis (Estes et al. 1999)
and Osprey Pandion haliaetus (Machmer and Ydenberg
1998). Cannibalism has been reported in the Common
Pheasant Phasianus colchicus (Cain et al. 1984) and the
domestic hen, and may be related to dietary factors
(Ambrosen and Petersen 1997). We suggest that the
behaviour of infanticide and cannibalism may have evolved
in Oriental Pied Hornbill because it pays females to lay
more eggs than the number of chicks that can be most
effectively raised, reduce brood size to invest resources in
the healthiest chicks, and to ‘recycle’ those in the youngest
and weakest chick among its siblings.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the following for support: Jurong Bird Park, Singapore,
and the Bird Ecology Study Group of the Nature Society (Singapore) .
We are also grateful to Yvon Le Maho (l’lnstitut Pluridisciplinaire
Hubert Curien), Pilai Poonswad (Mahidol University) and an
anonymous referee for providing comments.
REFERENCES
Ambrosen, T. and Petersen, V. E. (1997) The influence of protein level
in the diet on cannibalism and quality of plumage of layers . Poultry Sci.
76: 559-563.
Cain, J. R., Weber, J. M., Lockamy, T. A. and Creger, C. R. (1984)
Grower diets and bird density effects on growth and cannibalism in
Ring-necked Pheasants. Poultry Sci. 63: 450-457.
Clifford, L. D. and Anderson, D. J. (2002) Clutch size variation in the
Nazca booby: a test of the egg quality hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 13:
274-279.
Estes, W. A., Dewey, S. R. and Kennedy, P. L. (1999) Siblicide at
Northern Goshawk nests: does food play a role? Wilson Bull. Ill:
432-436.
Kemp, A. (1995) The hombills. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Macedo, R. H. F. and Bianchi, C. A. (1997) When birds go bad:
circumstantial evidence for infanticide in the communal South-
American Guira Cuckoo. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 9: 45-54.
Machmer, M. M. and Ydenberg, R. C. (1998) The relative roles of
hunger and size asymmetry in sibling aggression between nestling
ospreys, Pandion haliaetus. Can. J. Zool. 76(1): 181-186.
Moller, A. P. (2004) Rapid temporal change in frequency of infanticide
in a passerine bird associated with change in population density and
body condition. Behav. Ecol. 15: 462—468.
Smith, H. G., Wennerberg, L. and von Schantz, T. (1996) Adoption or
infanticide: options of replacement males in the European starling.
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 191-197.
Veiga, J. P. (2003) Infanticide by male house sparrows: gaining
time or manipulating females? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270:
S87-89.
Watson, R. T., Razafindramanana, S., Thorstrom, R. and
Rafanomezantsoa, S. (1999) Breeding biology, extra-pair birds,
productivity, siblicide and conservation of the Madagascar Fish Eagle.
Ostrich 70: 105-111.
y. H. Chan andM. Zafirah, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore
637551. Email: yonghoow@yahoo. com. sg; zafirah83@pmail. ntu. edu. sg
M. Cremades and M. Divet, Singapore Hornbill Project, do Jurong Bird Park, 2 Jurong Hill, Singapore 628925. Email:
cvm. cremades@free.fr; mnd6 1 @hotmail. com
C. H. R. Teo, National Parks Board, 150 Beach Rd # 18-01/08 Gateway West, Singapore 189720. Email:
robert_teo@nparks.gov. sg
S. C. Ng, School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, do OandG Partners Fertility Centre, 6A Napier
Rd #01-38, Gleneagles Hospital Annex, Singapore 258500. Email: scng@ogpartners.com [Author for correspondence]
Chestnut-cheeked Starling Sturnus philippensis :
new for the Indian subcontinent
PIERRE VAN DERWIELEN
On the afternoon of 28 March 2006, Alma Leegwater,
Mario Renden, Rob Struyk and I were birding in a wide
grassy strip amidst tall forest at Nameri National Park
(26°56'4"N 92°5T09,,E), Assam, north-eastern India.
One of the highlights of the afternoon was the flocks of up
to 80 Spot-winged Starlings Saroglossa spiloptera spread
over the area. As this was a new species for all of us we
took our time to get a good look at this gorgeous starling.
Whilst examining a flock of about 40 Spot-winged
Starlings, I saw an individual which, at first glance, looked
like a male Purple-backed Starling Sturnus stuminus.
Realising that this would be a vagrant in India, I alerted
the others and pointed out the bird. We observed the bird
for about 30 minutes through binoculars and a 20-60 x
60 spotting scope at a range of about 60 m. After consulting
the two field guides we had with us (Kazmierczak and van
Perlo 2000, Rasmussen and Anderton 2005), we quickly
realised that several of the observed field marks did not fit
Purple-backed Starling. The most obvious differences on
‘our’ bird were the whitish head with a large reddish cheek/
ear-covert patch and the lack of a black cap. Because there
was no species in either book that matched it we decided
to take a detailed description and to try to obtain some
photographs.
174
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
The conditions were perfect with no wind, no cloud
cover and with the light coming from behind. The whole
period we watched the bird, it stayed on the same bare
branch even after the Spot-winged Starlings left. We
obtained eight digiscoped photographs. These are rather
poor but do show the diagnostic head markings. The bird
flew while we were busy with camera and field guides, and
we were unable to record additional field marks in flight.
Our field notes provided the following description.
The bird had the typical shape of a starling; it was smaller
than the Spot-winged Starlings around it, and less
elongated in shape,, creating a stockier look. Its head was
creamy-white with a rather big dark eye with a thin, pale
eye-ring. The bill was rather long, pointed and black. On
both the sides of the head was a brick-red cheek/ear-covert
patch with extensions towards the throat and upper breast.
The flanks were grey and the belly largely white. The
white underparts started from the undertail-coverts,
continued on the belly and ended in a point on the upper
breast. The legs were greyish. The wings were glossy-
black with a white, elongated shoulder-patch. The
upperparts were dark grey to black, with no gloss observed,
merging into a pale grey rump with a dark wedge in the
middle.
Back at our accommodation we consulted our last
available field guide, Gnmmett etal. (1998), but this did
not help either. It was only when we got home two weeks
later and consulted other books including Robson (2000)
and Feare and Craig (1998) that we identified the bird as
a male Chestnut-cheeked Starling Stumus philippensis.
The identification was straightforward as there are only
a few species of starling in Asia, none of which shows the
combination of a dark upperparts and wings, pale head
and a brick-red cheek/ear-covert patch. This is the first
record of Chestnut-cheeked Starling in India and the
Indian subcontinent.
This species breeds quite commonly in northern and
central Japan and adjacent islands in Russia, but not on
the Asian mainland. The wintering area spans the region
between southern Japan and the Philippines. Due to the
rather low numbers in the known wintering areas it appears
that the main wintering grounds have yet to be discovered
(Feare and Craig 1998). On migration it is mostly seen in
Japan but it also passes through eastern China, with good
numbers on Taiwan. The first birds arrive in southern
Japan in late March, moving north until they arrive in the
breeding areas in April to early May. In their wintering
areas, the last birds are usually seen in late April (Feare
and Craig 1998).
Vagrants have been recorded in eastern Russia,
northern Sulawesi, the Moluccas, peninsular Malaysia,
Singapore and apparently in the U.S.A. (Feare and Craig
1998). In Thailand, their occurrence is quite recent, with
several records in the last few winters (reports on the Bird
Conservation Society of Thailand website,
www. best. or. th/eng/sighting. htm). As Thailand is part
of the wintering grounds of Spot-winged Starling it is
quite possible that the Chestnut-cheeked Starling joined
a flock of the former on their way back to India. Spot¬
winged Starlings breed in the foothills of the Himalayas
in Nepal and further west. They winter from Assam east
to north-western Thailand; westward migration through
Assam and Nepal is in the period March-April. On their
wintering grounds they often form mixed flocks with other
starlings and mynas, and this suggests a way in which the
Chestnut-cheeked Starling we observed may have found
its way to India.
REFERENCES
Feare, C. and Craig, A. ( 1 998) Starlings and mynas. London: Christopher
Helm.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Kazmierczak, K. and van Perlo, B. (2000) A field guide to the birds of the
Indian subcontinent. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide, Vol. 1 . Washington, D.C. and Barcelona: Smithsonian
Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Pierre van der Wielen, Rosmolen 67, 1703 NE, Heerhngowaard, The Netherlands. Email: pvd.wielen@planet.nl
First record of Rufous-bellied Woodpecker
Dendrocopos hyperythrus in Lao PDR
ROLAND EVE
On 20 March 2006, I recorded a Rufous-bellied
Woodpecker Dendrocopos hyperythrus in dry dipterocarp
forest south-west of Ban Tapouak village, Xekong
province, Lao PDR, (1 5°33'35"N 106°42'02,,E, 240 m)
during a biodiversity survey project (Poulsen et al. 2006) .
The weather was clear and sunny and the bird was seen
at a distance of c.15 m over a period of several minutes.
It was watched drumming on a dipterocarp snag (c.25 cm
in diameter) in good light. It was identified by its
conspicuous plain rufous underparts, contrasting grey
around the eyes and on the lores, fine black and white
barring on the upperparts, and a white-spotted black cap,
indicating it was a female. No other woodpecker species
has this combination of white-barred black upperparts
and rufous underparts.
The fact that the bird was seen showing territorial
behaviour (drumming) suggests that the species breeds in
the area. There is also a long-distance migrant population
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
175
that breeds in north-east Asia and winters southwards
(Valchuk 2000), conceivably into Lao PDR. Four other
woodpecker species were recorded the same morning at
the same site, namely Grey-capped Pygmy Woodpecker
D. canicapillus, Greater Flameback Chrysocolaptes lucidus,
Black-headed Woodpecker Picus erythropygius and Laced
Woodpecker Picus vittatus, amounting to a total of five
species in this relatively small forest site.
This represents the first record of this species for Lao
PDR. Previously, it had been listed for the country, through
its collection by Flarmand in 1875 at ‘Kouys’. At this time
‘Kouys’ (= the land of the Kouy people) lay within Lao
PDR, and Oustalet (1899) therefore published the record
as from Lao PDR. Shortly afterwards, boundary changes
meant that the whole Kouy territory now lies within
Cambodia (Duckworth et al. 1999, Thomas and Poole
2003), although the Kouys records continued to be listed
for Laos (e.g. King etal. 1975) until 1999. Rufous-bellied
Woodpecker is recorded from Pakistan through the
northern part of the Indian subcontinent, Myanmar,
Thailand and Indochina, with a northerly extension through
China to the Russian Far East (Robson 2000, Valchuk
2000). Across this species’s vast range it occupies a wide
variety of habitat, but the race D. h. annamensis which
Kloss (1925) named from southern Vietnam and to which
Lao (and the recently re-discovered Cambodian) birds
presumably belong, evidently Occurs only in dry dipterocarp
forest, and seems to have a restricted distribution even
within that habitat (W. Duckworth in litt. 2006).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I greatly thank Will Duckworth for reviewing and editing this note.
REFERENCES
Duckworth, J. W., Salter, R. E. and Khounboline, K., compilers (1999)
Wildlife in Lao PDR: 1999 status report. Vientiane: lUCN-The World
Conservation Union/Wildlife Conservation Society/Centre for
Protected Areas and Watershed Management.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) A field
guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Kloss, C. B. (1925) New subspecies of Dryobates and Lalage. Bull. Brit.
Orn. Club 46: 7-8.
Oustalet, E. (1899) Les oiseaux du Cambodge, du Laos, de l’Annam
et du Tonkin. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris (4)1: 221-296.
Poulsen, M. K., Eve, R., Khounboline, K., Jellinek, S. and Hodgson,
B. D. (2006) Biodiversity survey and monitoring framework
development. Vientiane: Xekong Sustainable Forestry Project
(Report 10).
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Thomas, W. W. and Poole, C. M. (2003) An annotated list of the birds
of Cambodia from 1859 to 1970. Forktail 19: 103-127.
Valchuk, O. P. (2000) [Range and ecology of the Rufous-bellied
Woodpecker Dendrocopos hyperthrus subrufinus in Ussuriland and
in adjacent China.] Zoologicheskii Zhumal 7 9 : 194-200. (In Russian.)
Roland Eve, WWF Laos, P.O.Box 7871, House No. 39, Unit 05, Saylom Road, Saylom village, Chanthabouly district,
Vientiane, Lao PDR. Email: roland.eve@wwfgreatermekong.org
Differences in the diet of three Peregrine Falcon
Falco peregrinus pairs nesting in Chukotka,
north-east Russia
R. PROBST, M. PAVLICEV and R. SCHMID
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus is distributed almost
worldwide and its breeding range encompasses virtually
all major climatic zones. It feeds mainly on medium-sized
birds, which are often caught in mid-air. While much is
known about its breeding and diet in some parts of its
range (e.g. Europe and North America: Ratcliffe 1993),
comparatively little information is available from the north¬
eastern Palaearctic even though it breeds regularly in this
region (Stepanyan 1990, Ferguson-Lees and Christie
2001). Here we report our observations on the diet of
nesting pairs of Peregrine Falcons in Chukotka, Russia.
METHODS
During the course of two expeditions in 2001 and 2002
to south Chukotka, north-east Siberia, prey remains of
nesting Peregrine Falcons were opportunistically collected
at one inland and two coastal locations. One pair was
found about 20 km south of the capital Anadyr (Anadyr
Bay, 64°44'N 1 77°30'E), one in the vicinity of the remote
Cape Navarin (62°18'N 179°09'E), and another inland
along the river Anadyr (65°29'N 173°18'E; Fig. 1).
The pair in the Anadyr Bay was first spotted on 3 June
200 1 but neither adults nor juveniles were seen during a
stay of about three hours, two months later (5 August).
We concluded that a breeding attempt was unsuccessful,
presumably because the falcons had been disturbed during
our absence by the building of a fisherman’s hut at the
base of the breeding cliff. Feather remains of plucked
prey were taken during our first visit. These samples were
collected from the upper edge and vicinity (up to 1 50 m)
of the nesting cliff, which was about 30 m high at this
location.
176
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
170”E 180” 170”W
Figure 1. Locations of the three Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
breeding sites studied in Chukotka, north-east Siberia.
Table 1. Prey species and (minimum) numbers recorded at three
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus breeding sites in Chukotka, north¬
east Siberia.
At Cape Navarin, plucked feathers were collected on
25 July 2001, when two juveniles had just fledged and
were sitting nearby. Most of the feathers were highly
concentrated on a talus just below the presumed nesting
cliff. Additionally, one adult appeared with a Crested
Auklet Aethia cnstatella in its talons when we were present.
However, as we were fairly close and, therefore, probably
disturbed it, the falcon flew away after some minutes, still
carrying the auklet.
At the Anadyr River location, prey remains were
collected on 1 2 July 2002, when two nestlings, only a few
days old, were found on an easily accessible ledge. Plucked
feathers were gathered from close to the nest as most of
the nesting slope was steep and covered by dense willow
vegetation.
Apart from a few easily identifiable feathers, such as
tail-streamers of Long-tailed Jaegers Stercorarius
longicaudus , all prey remains were collected. About 90%
of these were brought to Austria. The rest were identified
at Anadyr in 2001 with the assistance with A. V.
Kondratyev (University of St. Petersburg), who has long
experience with the Siberian avifauna. Feathers brought
to Austria were identified later (most by H. Lauermann),
using the reference collection of the Natural History
Museum, Vienna. Identification was possible at least to
genus level for all feathers. Samples consisted mostly of
remiges and rectrices, however, especially in the very
common prey species, Crested Auklet, whole wings
(obviously dissected by the Peregrine Falcons) were found.
As the plucked feathers were fresh, colour and structure
were good cues for species discrimination. The minimum
number of prey individuals was conservatively estimated
from these remains. This was mostly done by comparing
the numbers and positions of feathers of the left and right
hand, the numbers of rectrices and the numbers of whole
wings (especially for Crested Auklet).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Taken together, 92 prey items were identified from the
three nest sites (Table 1). Although the number of nests
and prey is low, and indirect sampling techniques
(Rosenfield et al. 1 995) as well as individual specialisation
(Dekker and Taylor 2005) are known to produce biased
results, we believe that our findings are an important
addition to the scarce information on the feeding
behaviour of Peregrine Falcons in this remote, sub-arctic
area (Ratcliffe 1993).
A striking result was that the availability of certain prey
taxa was associated with pronounced differences in prey
choice. Peregrine Falcons at Anadyr Bay and along the
Anadyr River, with no access to seabird colonies, appeared
to take predominantly terns and shorebirds (Table 1). In
contrast, the pair at Cape Navarin seemed to hunt Crested
Auklets almost exclusively. Hence, the diet of the two
coastal falcon pairs showed a greater difference than that
between the locations along the Anadyr River and its
mouth. Differences between the latter appeared largely to
result from differences in local prey availability, with
Common Tern Sterna hirundo being hunted inland more
frequently than Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea. Similarly,
species like Wood Sandpiper Tringaglareola and Common
Snipe Gallinago gallinago occur more often on extended
floodplains than in the (here) more bare coastal tundra
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
177
inhabited by, for example, Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis
fulva and Long-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus.
Prey remains at Cape Navarin consisted nearly entirely
of Crested Auklets, despite the presence of tens of
thousands of seabirds, especially Northern Fulmar
Fulmarus glacialis and Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa
tridactyla , but also flocks of Pigeon Guillemot Cepphus
columba , Horned Puffin Fratercula comiculata and Tufted
Puffin Fratercula cirrhata. During our short visit, >2,000
Crested Auklets were seen, apparently from an unreported
breeding colony (see Gaston and Jones 1998). Moreover,
Dovekie Alle alle feathers were found in our sample, even
though the nearest reported breeding colony of this species
is about 700 km to the north-east, on the Diomede Islands
in the Bering Strait. Our observations appear similar to
the feeding behaviour known for the subspecies F. p. pealei,
occurring from the Commander Islands, across the
Aleutians to western coastal North America (Ferguson-
Leesand Christie 2001), with alcids (Alcidae) like Ancient
Murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus, Least Auklet Aethia
pusilla , and Crested Auklet comprising the bulk of the
prey (Beebe 1960, White etal. 1973,Dekker 1999). Where
present, alcids appear to be important and easily available
prey for Peregrine Falcons around the northern rim of the
Pacific Ocean.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank E. E. Syroechkovski Jr. (Russian Academy of Sciences,
Moscow, Russia) for organising our two expeditions to Chukotka. A.
V. Kondratyev (University of St. Petersburg, Russia), A. Gamauf, E.
Weifi, and, especially, H. Lauermann (all Natural History
Museum Vienna, Austria) were of great help with the identification of
the prey remains. M. McGrady (Krems, Austria) kindly improved our
English.
REFERENCES
Beebe, F. L. (1960) The marine peregrines of the north-west Pacific
coast. Condor 62: 145-189.
Dekker, D. (1999) Bolt from the blue: wild peregrines on the hunt. Blaine,
U.S.A.: Hancock House Publishers.
Dekker, D. and Taylor, R. (2005) A change in foraging success and
cooperative hunting by a breeding pair of Peregrine Falcons and
their fledglings. J. Raptor Res. 39: 386-395.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world.
London, U.K: Christopher Helm.
Gaston, A. J. and Jones, 1. L. (1998) The auks. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Ratcliffe,D. 1993. The Peregrine Falcon. Second edition. London, U.K. :
T. & A. D. Poyser.
Rosenfield, R. N., Schneider, J. W., Papp, J. M. and Seegar, W. S.
(1995) Prey of Peregrine Falcons breeding in west Greenland.
Condor 97: 763-770.
Stepanyan, L. S. (1990) Conspectus of the ornithological fauna of the
USSR. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
White, C. M., Emison, W. B. and Williamson, F. S. L. (1973)
DDE in a resident Aleutian island Peregrine population. Condor
75: 306-311.
R. Probst, Radetzkystr. 21/11, A-1030 Vienna, Austria. Email: remo.probst@gmx.at
M. Pavlieev, Washington University, 660 S Euclid ave, BOX 8108, St. Louis, MO 63110, U.S.A.
R. Schmid, Lydererstr. 1, A-2514 Traiskirchen, Austria.
First likely breeding record of Yellow-billed Grosbeak
Eophona migratoria for Kinmen Island, Taiwan
BAILEY D. MCKAY and YI- WEN PENG
Yellow-billed Grosbeak Eophona migratoria is a large finch
that breeds from southern Amurland and southern
Ussuriland to Manchuria, Korea and eastern China, and
southern Japan (Vaurie 1959). In China the nominate
subspecies breeds in the north-east, whereas E. m. sowerbyi
has a more southerly distribution breeding along the
Chang Jiang Valley from Sichuan east to Jiangsu and
Shanghai Municipality (Cheng 1987). It winters from
Fujian to Guangdong, Guangxi, southern Yunnan, and
in small numbers in T aiwan (Meyer de Schauensee 1 984) .
Its habitat includes cultivation, orchards, and woodlands
where it feeds on berries and seeds (King et al. 1975,
MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
At 08h25 on 25 July 2006, we observed an adult pair
of finches with three juveniles while bird-watching on
Kinmen Island, Taiwan. The birds were observed from a
distance of 1 5 m with binoculars and identified by both of
us and a third observer as Yellow-billed Grosbeaks by
their massive black-tipped yellow bills, greyish bodies and
prominent white wing markings. The male had a dark
head and throat; the female did not have any black on the
head. The juveniles were similar to the female but the
head and underparts were buffier-brown, the wing-bars
were buffy instead of white, and the tails were shorter,
indicating they had recently fledged. The birds were
discovered at a cultivated public garden with orchards. All
five were observed briefly on the same branch and flushed
together as we approached for a closer look.
Kinmen (24.44°N 1 18.33°E) is the largest island in a
small archipelago located off the west coast of Taiwan
roughly 5 km from the south-east coast ofmainland China;
the climate is subtropical. The Yellow-billed Grosbeak is
178
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
an uncommon but regular winter visitor to Kinmen. Rarely,
but in increasing numbers, this species has been recorded
on Kinmen during the breeding season (Wild Bird Society
of I-Lan 2007). Our record is, however, the first report of
what appears to be successful breeding of Yellow-billed
Grosbeaks on Kinmen. This record also represents the
southernmost breeding record for this species barring
observations in Hong Kong, where breeding was first
proven in 2003 and has been confirmed or suspected in
every year since then (J. Allcock in litt. 2007) . Summering
birds have also been noted at Nan’ao near Shantou in
eastern Guangdong Province approximately 1 60 km south¬
west of Kinmen (Sun et al. 2007)
Increased reports of this species south of its normal
breeding range in a time of global climate change suggests
that this species may be in the early stages of a range
expansion. The Yellow-billed Grosbeak’s preference for
human disturbance may facilitate this expansion. It should
be noted that Yellow-billed Grosbeaks are regularly kept
as cage birds in China, so the possibility exists that the
birds we observed were escapees. In this case, this report
would represent a new introduction event and possibly the
early stages of the naturalisation of this species on Kinmen
Island. The only other explanation of the presence of this
family group on Kinmen Island is that the family group
flew or was blown to Kinmen from its breeding grounds on
mainland China. Because Yellow-billed Grosbeaks do not
breed in mainland China adjacent to Kinmen, they would
have to have travelled as a group at least 1 60 km from their
nearest possible breeding grounds. We suggest that this is
extremely unlikely and think that these were probably wild
birds or possibly escapees. Whether the Yellow-billed
Grosbeak on Kinmen represents an isolated occurrence, a
range expansion, or the introduction and naturalisation of
an exotic species is unclear. Future breeding activity of
Y ellow-billed Grosbeaks on Kinmen and elsewhere should
be closely monitored as this species is likely to have a
dynamic distribution.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BDM was supported with an East Asia and Pacific Summer Institute
fellowship from the National Science Foundation. Cheng-te Yao and
two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Cheng, T. H. ( 1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing: Science
Press.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M. W. (1975) Afield
guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. Washington, D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
Sun, Z., Lu, W., Lewthwaite, R. W., Li, G., Yu, R., Leven, M. R.,
Williams, M. D. and Sherrard, K. (2003) Summer birds
investigation in Nan Ao and its nearby islands of Guangdong
Province. J. Shantou University (Natural Science) 18: 1-6. (In
Chinese with English abstract.)
Vaurie, C. 1959. The birds of the Palearctic fauna. London: Witherby.
Wild Bird Society of I-Lan (2007) Yellow-billed Grosbeak records.
http://140. 1 1 1.1 50. 1 30/ilcbird/wildbird/newwildbird/Record/
searchrecord.asp?b_id=7406. Accessed 21 May 2007. (In Chinese.)
Bailey D. McKay, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830 U.S.A. Email: mckaybd@aubum.edu
Yi-Wen Peng, School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road,
Da-ati District, Taipei City 106, Taizuati (R.O.C.). Email: b89204028@ntu.edu. tzv
Breeding records and observations of the Little
Egret Egretta garzetta in peninsular Malaysia
CHRIS R. SHEPHERD
Little Egret Egretta garzetta is a bird of paddyfields,
riverbanks, sand- and mud-bars, and small coastal
streams, and is also found in ponds and flooded fields
(Strange and Jeyarajasingam 1993, MacKinnon and
Phillipps 1993). Its breeding range spans the warm-to-
temperate parts of Eurasia from the Atlantic to Korea
and Japan, South Asia, southern China, South-East Asia
and north and east Australia (Hancock and Kushlan 1984,
Galdikas et al. 1985, Wells 1999).
The Little Egret was earlier not known to breed in the
Thai-Malay Peninsula (Wells 1999); however, recent
records indicate that the breeding range is expanding. In
peninsular Malaysia, a breeding colony was found in 2002
in Malim Nawar (Yeap 2002) and another in 2004 in
Kinta Nature Park (Lim 2004a, b), both in Perak State,
Malaysia. Here I report on the occurrence of Little Egret
in two further breeding colonies in peninsular Malaysia.
Two heronries were visited at Rawang (3°18,39"N
101°34'46"E), in the state of Selangor, during October
2005-March 2006. Observations at Rawang I were made
from an observation tower near the side of the road, whereas
the heronry in Rawang II was clearly observed also from
the road at the edge of the wetland where it was located.
OBSERVATIONS
Rawang I
On 9 October 2005 (05h00-18h30) the majority of the
birds in the heronry were Little Egrets. A single Little
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
179
Egret chick was observed on a nest. Another nest had a
brooding adult, but the nest contents could not be seen.
Black-crowned Night Herons Nycticorax nycticorax were
also nesting all around. On 22 October 2005 (08h30-
1 lhOO), c. 50-60 Little Egrets were observed, of which 19
were sitting on nests and 5 were seen building nests. One
Little Egret was observed adding materials to a nest that
had only recently been vacated by Black-crowned Night
Herons (fledgling night herons were observed in the same
nest on the previous visit), and two pairs were observed
mating on their nests. Three nests were examined, two of
which contained two eggs each, and one contained three
eggs. According to Hancock and Kushlan (1984), three
eggs is typical in tropical areas (five is the usual number
in temperate zones and sometimes as many as eight are
found). No chicks were observed. All Little Egrets were
in breeding plumage, having plumes on their heads, backs
and neck and with the characteristic yellow feet of the
subspecies E. g. garzetta. On 26 March 2006 c.40 Little
Egrets were observed, including c.10 juveniles. Sixteen
active nests at various stages were observed, some with
eggs, some with juveniles. One adult was observed feeding
three juveniles.
Rawang II
On 26 March 2006, another heronry was found c.2 km
from the Rawang I heronry. This second location had
been visited in October 2005 when no Little Egrets or
Black-crowned Night Herons were seen. On the second
visit c.100 Little Egrets and 37 nests at various stages
were counted, including nests containing eggs, young
chicks and juveniles. Three pairs of adults were observed
mating.
DISCUSSION
Wells (1999) reviewed the status of Little Egrets in the
Thai-Malay Peninsula, and concluded that there was no
breeding population in peninsular Malaysia. Since 2002,
four heronries have been discovered in peninsular
Malaysia, which together support a total of c.60 active
nests. Three of these four heronries are well known and
had been surveyed prior to 2002; hence, the Little Egret
can be considered a ‘new’ breeding resident (rather than
having been overlooked as a breeder in the past). All of
the Little Egrets observed breeding in peninsular Malaysia
are of the subspecies E. g. garzetta. The nearest breeding
colonies in the north appear to be those in West Thailand
(800 km to Perak), and those further south in Pulau Dua,
West Java (1,100 km to Selangor). To monitor the
expansion of the Little Egret into peninsular Malaysia,
the four known nesting sites must be regularly monitored,
and other potential sites surveyed for the presence and
nesting of this species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Loretta Ann Soosayraj is to be thanked for assisting counting birds
and nests at the heronries. Vincent Nijman is also to be thanked for
providing valuable comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this
paper.
REFERENCES
Galdikas, B. M. F., Shapiro. G. L. and Katz, F. (1985) DanauBurung:
bird lake in southern Indonesian Borneo. Ardea 73: 189-190.
Hancock, J. and Kushlan, J. (1984) The herons handbook. New York,
U.S.A: Harper and Row.
Lim, K. C. (2004a) Recent sightings. Sitara Enggang. 2004(3): 8-22.
Lim, K. C. (2004b) Recent sightings. Suara Enggang. 2004(4): 1 1-17.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (1993) A field guide to the birds of
Borneo, Sumatra, Java and Bali. New York, U.S.A. : Oxford
University Press.
Strange, M. and Jeyarajasingam, A. (1993) Birds: a photographic guide
to the birds of peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: Sun
Tree Publishing.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Volume 1 .
San Diego and London: Academic Press.
Yeap, C . A. (2002) Report from the field: results of the Asian Waterfowl
Census 2002 (Malaysia). Suara Enggang. 2002(3): 18-24.
Chris R. Shepherd, TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Unit 9-3 A, 3rd floor, Jl SS23/11, Tainan SEA, Petaling Java, Selangor,
Malaysia; and Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Email: cstsea@po.jaring.my
New and significant records of birds
in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India
HARKIRAT SINGH SANGHA and RISHAD NAOROJI
The state of Arunachal Pradesh, in north-east India, is a
biodiversity hotspot and supports a rich and diverse
birdlife. Several accounts of the avifauna of Arunachal
Pradesh have been published during the last decade,
including Athreyaet al. (1997), Birand and Pawar (2004),
Choudhury (1998, 2003), Datta (2001), Datta et al.
(1998), King and Donahue (2006), Kumar and Singh
(2000), Newton (2002), Sangha and Naoroji (2005),
Sangha et al. (2007) and Singh (1994, 1999, 2003).
Despite this, the avifauna of Arunachal Pradesh is poorly
180
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
understood: new bird records continue to be published,
including that of an entirely new species of Liocichla in
Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary (Athreya 2006).
In 2004 and 2005, we carried out fieldwork in the
northern areas of Arunachal Pradesh at Dibang and Siang
Valleys (17-27 February 2004) and Siang Valley and
Tawang area (9-26 December 2005). Over the course of
our fieldwork, we observed birds from vehicles or during
foot transects. At T uting and Gelling we mist-netted birds
for a total of 1 5 hours. The fieldwork covered tropical low
to snow-bound high elevation montane areas (500-4,33 1
m) . In this note we report new (*) and significant records
arising from our work.
* BOOTED Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus
An individual was seen on 23 February 2004 near 65 Mile
(28°42'N 95°08'E) en route from Pasighat to Jengging in
the Siang Valley. Another was observed 5 km further
along the road, soaring over the degraded hill slopes with
scattered cultivation. The small size, long wings, square-
ended tail, strong contrast between white underwing-
coverts and dark flight-feathers and secondaries, with
contrasting pale wedge in the inner primaries and dusky
tail-tip, were clearly visible. This is the first record of
Booted Eagle from Arunachal Pradesh; there are few
records from adjoining Bhutan and Bangladesh
(Kazmierczak and van Perlo 2000). In Bhutan, it is an
uncommon passage migrant and winter visitor, recorded
in five of eight years following 1995 (Spierenburg 2005).
Both authors have regularly observed the species in Assam
and Meghalaya.
BLACK Baza Aviceda leuphotes
An individual was seen flying at dusk over a harvested
paddyfield at the edge of forest near Gelling (29°07'N
94°59'E) on 13 December 2005. It was easily identified
by the distinctive black (underwing-coverts and undertail-
coverts) and silver-grey (primaries and tail) pattern from
below. There is one winter record from Arunachal
Pradesh, at Namdapha (Birand and Pawar 2004).
Described as scarce and local, especially on migration
and in winter (Rasmussen and Anderton 2005 ) and as
uncommon in the north-east (Grimmett et al. 1998), it
occurs mainly in the Himalayan foothills in Uttaranchal
and from central and east Nepal east to north-east India
and Bangladesh; it also occurs in Kerala and Sri Lanka
(Grimmett et al. 1998).
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris
Critically Endangered (BirdLife International 2001). At
least 24 were observed soaring on 2 1 February 2004 above
the extensive grassland that forms the floodplain of the
Dibang river en route to Nizamghat (28°27'N 95°73'E).
We observed mostly adults, with a few juveniles and
immatures. We had clear views, and adults were easily
identified by the dark neck, streaked breast, mostly white
ruff, long compressed slender bill and cere, white thigh-
patches and dark undertail-coverts.
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis
A soaring juvenile was seen over Kepang La (c. 1 ,450 m)
near Gelling on 15 December 2005. It circled over the
pass for about two minutes and then drifted across the
McMahon Line into Tibetan territory. Clearly a large
vulture, the bird was identified by its small pale head and
dark underbody, pale bands through underwing-coverts
contrasting with dark, pale streaked underparts, and its
heavy-bodied appearance with broad wings. The species
has been earlier reported only from Thingbu (Singh 1 994)
and Namsai and Kornu (Singh 1999) although it is a
common scavenger in some parts of the Himalayas and
the Tibetan plateau (MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
Slender-billed Babbler Turdoides longirostris
Vulnerable (BirdLife International 2001). A flock of at
least six birds was seen in the grassland c.2 km south-east
of Nizamghat on 21 February, 2004. Although listed as
resident from ‘Oudh, the Nepal and Sikkim terai, northern
Bengal, Bhutan duars, Arunachal Pradesh (Dafla duars),
Assam to east Lakhimpur near Sadiya, Meghalaya and
Manipur south to the Chittagong region’ (Ripley 1982)
its current status in India is uncertain and the very few
recent records are all from Assam and one site in West
Bengal (BirdLife International 200 1 ) . This elusive species
is inferred to have a small, rapidly declining population
because of extensive destruction and degradation of its
tall grassland habitats.
Black-headed Shrike Babbler Pteruthius rufiventer
Near Threatened (Collar et al. 1 994), but Least Concern
in BirdLife International (2001). About seven birds were
observed near Moying as they foraged in a small mixed-
species flock that included three Cutia Cutia nipalensis
and 7-8 Chestnut-bellied Nuthatch Sitta castanea on 25
February 2004. The species was at an exceptionally low
altitude of c. 600 m. According to Grimmett etal. (1998),
it has been recorded 1,100-2,200 m in India and 2,135-
2,500 m in Nepal. Ali and Ripley (1996) describe it as
sparse resident between c. 1,500 m and 2,500 m.
WHITE-NAPED YUHINA Yuhina bakeri
This scarce species is restricted to the Himalayas from
east Nepal to south-east Arunachal Pradesh and the south
Assam hills (Rasmussen and Anderton 2005) . The Gelling
area holds an important population of White-naped
Yuhina, and we saw it almost every day in single-species
flocks of c. 15-20 individuals in broadleaved forest at
1,000-1,500 m from 13 to 14 December 2005.
White-throated Redstart Phoenicians schisticeps
About 10 km north of Tawang around Ptso at 3,600-
4,000 m, at least ten birds including two striking males
were seen on 25 December 2005. Five more birds were
recorded on 26 December 2005 at Se La (27°31'N
92°36'E, 4, 1 52 m). The species was listed for Arunachal
Pradesh (Ripley 1 982) on the basis of Ludlow and Kinnear
(1944). White-throated Redstart occurs mainly in the
Himalayas from west Nepal to east Bhutan (Grimmett et
al. 1998).
Dusky Warbler Phylloscopus fuscatus
Two birds were mist-netted on 17 and 18 December
2005 from the scrub area around the Inspection Bungalow
at Gelling. Although a fairly common winter visitor to
north-east India, it has been recorded only once from
Itanagar (Singh 1994).
COMMON Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus
Small flocks of 5-6 birds were seen on 1 9 and 20 December
2005 in the scrubljhumed area around the Inspection
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
181
Bungalow at Gelling (1,100 m). The species ( roseatus
group) breeds in the Himalayas from Ladakh east to
probably Arunachal Pradesh and winters mostly in
southern India (Rasmussen and Anderton 2005) but it
has been reported only from Hotspring and Hunli-Etalin
in Arunachal Pradesh (Singh 1994).
Spot-winged Rosefinch Carpodacm rodopeplus
Four birds including one male were observed well in
rhododendron scrub and bushes on slopes of the Se La on
26 December 2005 . The male was identified by brownish
upperparts, longish pink supercilium, pink rump and faint
pink spots on wing-bars and tertials. The species is resident
from Uttaranchal to east Nepal and southern Tibet
(Rasmussen and Anderton 2005). Ripley (1982) says that
the species is ‘not recorded from Bhutan and Arunachal
Pradesh’ but it has since been recorded once from
Mayodia, eastern Arunachal Pradesh (Singh 1994).
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) have commented that
the sight record from eastern Arunachal Pradesh may
pertain to Sharpe’s Rosefinch Carpodacm verreauxii rather
than the Spot-winged Rosefinch on geographical grounds.
Sharpe’s Rosefinch, usually treated as conspecific with
C. rodopeplus , is a winter visitor to northern Myanmar
(Clement et al. 1993) and is likely to occur in eastern
Arunachal Pradesh.
Plain Mountain Finch Leucosticte nemoricola
A flock of about 50 birds was observed foraging on snow-
covered alpine scrub and pasture near Bum La (4,33 1 m)
on the McMahon Line (Indo-Tibetan border) on 25
December 2005. This species was recorded in 1997 from
Yak Farm (Singh 1999) and previously by Ludlow and
Ivinnear ( 1 944) and Ghosh (1987). Plain Mountain Finch
is resident in the mountains of north-east Afghanistan
and the Himalayas of north Pakistan to at least east Bhutan
(Rasmussen and Anderton 2005).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Chief of the Army Staff General J. J. Singh for his continued interest
and assistance for our projects; Maj. General R. P. S. Malhan, Additional
Director General Staff Duties for infrastructural support at Tawang;
Brig. M. M. S. Rai of 5th Mountain Brigade for hospitality at Along,
Colonel Prakash T ewari, Director, Policy (Ecology) Environment and
Ecology Cell, Land, Works and Environment Dte organised permissions,
infrastructure support and advised accordingly; Major R. K. Anuj and
ranks of 1 7 Kumaon for hospitality and logistical support at Tuting and
Gelling, Ranesh Roy of Eco Camp were extremely hospitable and helpful;
Arun Kumar Roy for arranging logistics . T sering Nurboo and Mehboob
Alam Hussain’s field assistance was invaluable.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1996) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan,
Volume 7. Second Edition. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Athreya, R. (2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves:Timaliidae) from
Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian
Birds 2(4): 82-94.
Athreya, R. M., Captain, A. S. and Athreya, V. R. (1997) A faunal
survey of Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Unpublished report.
Birand, A. and Pawar, S. (2004) An ornithological survey in north-east
India. Forktail 20: 15-24.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch
2 — the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Choudhury, A. ( 1 998) Some new elevation records of birds from Mehao
Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Forktail 14: 71.
Choudhury, A. (2003) Birds of Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary and Sessa
Orchid Sanctuary, Arunchal Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 1-13.
Clement, P., Harris, A. and Davis, J. (1993) Finches and sparrows: an
identification guide. London: Christopher Helm.
Datta, A. (200 1 ) An ecological study of sympatric hornbills and fruiting
patterns in a tropical forest in Arunachal Pradesh. Ph.D thesis,
Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India.
Datta, A., Singh, P., Athreya, R. M. and Karthikeyan, S. (1998) Birds
of Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary in western Arunachal Pradesh.
Newsletter for Birdwatchers 38: 91-96.
Ghosh, A. K. (1987) Qualitative analysis of faunal resources of proposed
Namdapha Biosphere Reseve, Arunachal Pradesh. Calcutta: Zoological
Survey of India.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.
Kazmierczak, K. and van Perlo, B. (2000) A field guide to the birds of the
Indian subcontinent. Robertsbridge, Sussex: Pica Press.
King, B. and Donahue, J. P. (2006) The rediscovery and song of Rusty-
throated Wren-Babbler Spelaeomis badeigularis. Forktail 22: 113-
115.
Kumar, R. S. and Singh, P. (2000) More news on the new monal
discovered from Arunachal Pradesh. Oriental Bird Club Bull 32:
63-65.
Ludlow, F. and Kinnear, N. B. (1944) The birds of south-eastern
Tibet. Ibis 86: 43-86, 176-208, 348-389.
Newton, P. N. (2002) Bird records from the Siang River valley,
Arunachal Pradesh, India. Forktail 18: 156.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Volumes 1 and 2. Washington D.C. and Barcelona:
Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Ripley, S. D. (1982) A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan. Second
edition. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford
University Press.
Sangha, H. S. and Naoroji, R. (2005) Slenderbilled Babbler Turdoides
longirostris in Arunachal Pradesh. Mistnet 6: 12.
Sangha, H. S., Naoroji, R. and Sharma, M. (2007) The Crested Tit-
babbler Leptopoecile elegans in north-west Arunachal Pradesh: an
addition to the Indian avifauna. Indian Birds 3(1): 23-25.
Singh, P. (1994) Recent bird records from Arunachal Pradesh. Forktail
10: 65-104.
Singh, P. ( 1 999) Bird surveys in selected localities of Arunachal Pradesh,
India. Wildlife Institute of India, Unpublished report.
Singh, P. (2003) Spotted Long-tailed Wren-Babbler Spelaeomis
troglodytoides (Verreaux) in Arunachal Pradesh. J. Bombay Nat.
Hist. Soc. 89: 376.
Spierenburg, P. (2005) Birds in Bhutan. Bedford, U.K: Oriental Bird
Club.
Harkirat Singh Sangha, B-27, Gautam Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Jaipur 302021 India. Email: sangha@datainfosys.net
Rishad Naoroji, Godrej Bhavan, 5th Floor, 4A Home Street, Fort, Mumbai 400001 India. Email: maoroji@bom3. vsnl. net. in.
182
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Migration strategies of Oriental Honey-buzzards
Pernis ptilorhyncus breeding in Japan
NICOLANTONIO AGOSTINI and UGO MELLONE
In a recent paper, Higuchi et al. (2005) reported data on
the autumn and spring migration of three Oriental Honey-
buzzards Pernis ptilorhyncus tracked by satellite. One adult
male, one adult female and one juvenile from the
population breeding in central Japan were studied. Here
we briefly summarise these results and suggest alternative
explanations for some aspects of them.
During autumn migration, the two adults migrated
earlier than the juvenile. All three birds reached continental
Asia by crossing the East China Sea. However, while the
adults flew westwards using a shorter route over water
(680 km; Fig. 1), the juvenile took a longer route south¬
west for about 1 , 1 00 km. Upon reaching continental Asia,
the adult female moved through China, Vietnam, Laos,
Thailand, the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra and finally
reached her wintering site in central Java after 52 days (19
September to 9 November 2003, including two stopover
days; Fig. 1; tracked distance 9,585 km). The adult male
used a very similar route but wintered in Mindanao
(Philippines) passing through Borneo, taking 68 days (22
September-28 November 2003) and covering 11,686 km.
After the longer sea crossing, the juvenile moved along
the coast to Vietnam, and crossed the Gulf of Thailand
to reach its wintering area in the Malay Peninsula after 7 7
days (29 September- 14 December 2003, including 41
stopover days at four sites; tracked distance 7,912 km).
During the winter, the juvenile moved between the Malay
Peninsula and Sumatra. In contrast, the adults were
apparently sedentary. The juvenile did not make the spring
migration northwards. The female returned on a longer
route in spring (tracked distance: 10,651 km), avoided
crossing the East China Sea and instead crossed the sea
between south Korea and Japan at a point where it is 50-
100 km wide (Fig. 1). Her migration lasted 87 days (22
February- 18 May 2004) with a long stopover (37 days)
in east Myanmar. The spring migration of the adult male
lasted 79 days (7 March to 24 May 2004); he was tracked
through Borneo, Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula, but
the signals were lost at his stopover site in eastern
Cambodia between 15 April and 22 May.
DISCUSSION
Why did the birds not use a more direct route via
the south-west islands?
Why did these Oriental Honey-buzzards not use a more
direct route via the south-west islands of Japan to reach
their wintering areas (Fig. 1), as do Grey-faced Buzzards
Butastur indicus, for example? Higuchi et al. (2005)
suggested two alternative hypotheses: (a) the diversity
and abundance of prey preferred by Oriental Honey-
buzzards are limited in the south-west islands; (b) Oriental
Honey-buzzards have a lower aspect ratio (i.e.
proportionately short wings, sensu Kerlinger 1989) than
Grey-faced Buzzards and thus they might incur an
unacceptably high energetic cost of migration through
the scattered islands from Japan to the Philippines and
Indonesia.
Regarding the first hypothesis, food diversity and
abundance along the migration route should not be of
critical importance in this species, given that soaring
raptors, including the European Honey-buzzard Pernis
apivorus, usually show long-distance fasting migration
(Smith etal. 1986, Alerstam and Hedenstrom 1998, Hake
et al. 2003, Panuccio et al. 2006). Regarding the second
hypothesis, although Onental Honey-buzzards undoubtedly
do have a lower aspect ratio than Grey-faced Buzzards, the
three tracked birds undertook some of the longest non¬
stop powered flights over water recorded among the
Accipitriformes (Kerlinger 1989, DeCandido etal. 2006a).
Higuchi et al. (2005) estimated that the adult female took
25-30 hours to cross the sea. Clearly, the species is able
to cover hundreds of kilometres over water and, like
European Honey-buzzard (Agostini et al. 2005), it has
navigation systems that function both during day and night.
Indeed, the multiple islands located along the southern
Figure 1. Approximate routes used during autumn and spring by the
adult female Oriental Honey-buzzard (solid lines), and a possible
alternative route between Japan and the Philippines via the south-west
islands of Japan (dotted line).
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
183
route would have necessitated shorter non-stop flights
over sea (with a maximum of 230 km between Kume and
Miyako) and the opportunity to rest in case of adverse
weather.
We suggest that there may not yet have been sufficient
time to evolve the more direct route through the south¬
west islands (assuming that movements shown by the
satellite-tracked individuals are representative of all the
population in Japan).
Why did the birds not use a shorter sea-crossing via
South Korea in autumn?
If the cost of powered flight over water is high, why do
birds not use the shorter crossing between Japan and
South Korea in autumn, as they do in spring? In this
regard, it is interesting to note that the Short-toed Snake
Eagle Circaetus gallicus, a broad-winged raptor, uses a
short pathway over water between the Italian Peninsula
and Africa both during spring and autumn, crossing the
Straits of Gibraltar (14 km wide) rather than over the
central Mediterranean (Agostini et al. 2002a, Premuda
2004).
Oriental Honey-buzzard^ from Japan winter in areas
occupied by migrants from continental Asia in addition to
resident populations of five races of the same species [P.
p. ruficollis, P. p. torquatus, P. p. ptilorhyncus , P. p.
palawanensis, P. p. philip pensis) and populations of
congeners (e.g. Barred Honey-buzzard Pemis celebensis in
the Philippines: Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). If
migrants from Japan face significant competition on their
winter quarters with conspecific migrants as well as
conspecific and congeneric residents, they may migrate
through continental Asia after crossing the East China
Sea, rather than via South Korea, in order to reach their
wintering quarters sooner and to increase the probability
of finding suitable winter territories. Although the sea¬
crossing is shorter via South Korea, the overall route is
significantly longer.
For juveniles, there is another possible explanation.
When Oriental Honey-buzzard first colonised Japan,
juveniles may have retained the innate tendency to migrate
along a north-east-south-west axis, as with European
Honey-buzzards (Agostini and Logozzo 1995, Agostini
et al. 2002b, 2004, Hake et al. 2003). If so, and if they
have yet to evolve a tendency to use the more direct route
through the south-west islands, this may explain why
they still take the longer continental route in autumn.
The converse of this question is why did the female
take a different route in spring? Higuchi et al. (2005)
suggested that head-winds may make the East China Sea
route difficult at that time of year. Recent studies from
the central Mediterranean show that European Honey-
buzzards tend to cross water surfaces with tail rather than
headwinds (Agostini etal. 2005). Unfortunately, Higuchi
et al. did not report data concerning wind conditions in
the East China Sea. However, since the female flew very
far inland without attempting the water crossing (Fig. 1 ),
she presumably was not directly affected by wind
conditions at the East China Sea.
Instead, the explanation may be that adult Oriental
Honey-buzzards may have more time to migrate in spring
than autumn, because they leave their winter territories
early, primarily during February-early March (see also
DeCandido et al. 2006b). As a result, they can migrate
more slowly, make long stopovers and avoid hazardous
sea-crossings by taking the longer but safer route via South
Korea (which is also a possible route by which the species
colonised Japan).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank R. DeCandido and an anonymous referee for their useful
comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and G. Mo for checking
the English.
REFERENCES
Agostini, N. and Logozzo, D. (1995) Autumn migration of Honey
Buzzards in southern Italy. J. Raptor Res. 29: 275-277 .
Agostini, N., Baghino, L., Coleiro, C., Corbi, F. and Premuda, G. (2002a)
Circuitous autumn migration in the Short-toed Eagle ( Circaetus
gallicus) . J. Raptor Res. 36: 111-1 14.
Agostini, N., Coleiro, C., Corbi, F., Di Lieto, G., Pinos, F. and Panuccio,
M. (2002b) Water-crossing tendency of juvenile Honey Buzzards
during migration. Avocetta 26: 41-43.
Agostini, N., Coleiro, C. and Panuccio, M. (2004) Analysis of the autumn
migration of juvenile honey buzzards Pemis apivorus across the central
Mediterranean. J. Raptor Res. 38: 283-286.
Agostini, N., Panuccio, M. and Massa, B. (2005) Flight behaviour of
honey buzzards Pemis apivoms during migration over the sea. Buteo
14: 3-10.
Alerstam, T. and Hedenstrom, A. (1998) The development of bird
migration theory. J. Avian Biol. 29: 343-369.
DeCandido, R., Bierregaard, R. O., Martell, M. S. and Bildstein, K. L.
(2006a) Evidence of nocturnal migration by Osprey ( Pandion
haliaetus ) in North America and Western Europe. J. Raptor Res. 40:
156-158.
DeCandido, R. , Allen, D . and Bildstein, K. L. (2006b) Spring migration
of Oriental Honey-buzzards and other raptors at Tanjung Tuan,
Malaysia, 2000-2001. Forktail 22: 156-160.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world. London:
Christopher Helm.
Hake, M., Kjellen, N. and Alerstam, T. (2003) Age dependent migration
strategy in honey buzzards Pemis apivoms tracked by satellite. Oikos
103: 385-396.
Higuchi, H., Shiu, H., Nakamura, H., Uematsu, A., Kuno, K., Saeki,
M., Hotta, M., Tokita, K., Moriya, E., Morishita, E. and Tamura,
M. (2005) Migration of Honey-buzzards Pemis apivorus based on
satellite tracking. Omithol. Set. 4: 109-115
Kerlinger, P. (1989) Flight strategies of migrating hawks. Chicago: Chicago
University Press.
Panuccio, M., Agostini, N., Wilson, S., Lucia, G., Ashton-Booth, J.,
Chiatante, G.,Mellone, U. andTodisco, S. (2006) Does the Honey-
buzzard feed during migration? Brit. Birds 99: 365-367.
Premuda, G. (2004) [‘First observations on the circuitous spring migration
of Short-toed Eagle, Circaetus gallicus, on the Apuan Alps’.] Riv. Ital.
Om. 74:119-124. (In Italian with English summary.)
Smith, N. G., Goldstein, D. L. and Bartholomew, G. A. (1986) Is long¬
distance migration possible for soaring hawks using only stored fat?
Auk 103: 607-611.
Nicolantonio Agostini and Ugo Mellone, Mediterranean Raptor Migration Network ( zuzvtu.raptonnigration.org ), via Mario
Fioretti 18, 00159 Roma, Italy. Email: nicolantonioa@tiscalinet.it
184
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Observations of Flores Scops Owl Otus alfredi
on Flores, Indonesia, with a first description of
its vocalisations
ROBERT HUTCHINSON, JAMES EATON, BRAM DEMEULEMEESTER
and FRANK E. RHEINDT
Flores Scops Owl Otus alfredi is a little-known species
endemic to the island of Flores, Indonesia. Following
uncertainty regarding the taxonomic validity of O. alfredi
(e.g. Sibley and Monroe 1993), which resulted in omission
from world lists of threatened birds and conservation
plans (Collar et al. 1 994), the species status of this taxon
has now been confirmed (Widodo et al. 1999).
Prior to our observations, Flores Scops Owl was known
from only six records: three specimens collected by Alfred
Everett in October and November 1 896 at Gunung Repok
‘and other hills’ at c. 1,050 m in the Todo mountains of
south-west Flores; a single juvenile male mist-netted and
collected on 15 May 1994 at 1,400 m on the northern
slopes of Poco (= Mt) Mandasawu in the Ruteng
mountains; an adult mist-netted on 9 March 1994 near
Danau (= Lake) Ranamese at 1,200 m in the Ruteng
mountains (and subsequently held in captivity); and a
single individual observed at a height of 1 5 m in the sub¬
canopy of a tree on the forest fringe of Danau Ranamese
in September 1997 (Pilgrim et al. 2000). The species’s
vocalisations have thus far remained unknown.
OBSERVATIONS
Prior to dusk on 20 June 2005, close to the headquarters
at Danau Ranamese (8°38'S 120°33'E; Fig. 1) at 1,200
m, RH, JE and BD heard a series of calls . Although distant,
we instantly recognised them as being similar to calls
recorded by Raf Drijvers during a PHPA/BirdLifeAVWF
survey during September and October 1998. Although
R. Drijvers had not observed those birds, they were
believed to be Red-legged Crake Rallina fasciata, since
the vocalisations matched the description given by Coates
and Bishop (1997) and Schmutz (1977, 1978).
At least two birds continued to call distantly; then at
C.18h30, shortly after dusk and perhaps in response to
playback of R. Dnjvers’s recordings, they suddenly moved
close to our vantage point on the road. A short time later
one of the birds was located calling from a small bushy tree
c.3 m off the ground; we were surprised to find that the
vocalisations were from a small rufous scops owl Otus sp.
Over the next 1.5 hours the birds called almost
continually and were observed well four times in isolated
tall trees close to the roadside at heights of 10-15 m and
for 2-5 minutes on each occasion. The birds were
identified as Flores Scops Owl based on the following
features, all of which conform to the morphological
distinctions given by Widodo etal. ( 1 999) : a small compact
scops owl; short, rounded ear tufts; solidly rufous face
with distinct white eyebrows but no black border to the
facial disk; rufous-brown on the breast and flanks
becoming finely vermiculated on the lower flanks and
belly; underparts lacking black streaking; solidly rufous
upperparts; and rufous-brown wing feathers with distinct
white scapular markings and small, well-spaced, pale
Figure 1. Map of Flores, showing all the localities mentioned in the text; 1: Cerang, 2: Paku, 3: Puarlolo, 4: Poco Mandasawu and Ruteng, 5:
Danau Ranamese, 6: Aegela, 7: Keli Mutu, 8: Maumere, 9: Hi Wengot.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
185
notches on the primaries. Additional characters noted
include yellow irides, legs and feet.
Our observation took place in the few remnant large
trees close to the roadside in an area dominated by scrub
and tall grasses. The birds appeared to favour an area of
intact primary montane forest on steep slopes c.300 m to
the south of the road. Following our initial observations
overnight on 20-21 June, we never recorded the birds
away from this primary forest during two subsequent
visits. On the evening of 20 June and early morning of 2 1
June, we heard at least one additional bird vocalising
distantly. Perhaps the same bird was heard c. 500 m along
the road in the direction of Ruteng on the evening of 2 1
June. We had previously heard identical vocalisations c.2
km along the road towards Ruteng at dawn on 17 June.
We did not record the species on a visit to the Puarlolo
area (c.900 m, Fig. 1) on 23 June where R. Drijvers
recorded the vocalisations described above. The species
involved in this record remains unknown (see discussion
below), but further searches in the area are needed to
determine the true distribution and altitudinal range of
Flores Scops Owl.
Following our observations, and armed with the
vocalisations we had recorded, a minimum of two pairs
(four individuals) were heard by other observers during
23-27 August 2005. These included the pair we had
previously observed, one of which was seen by the roadside
c.300 m towards Ruteng (M. Bauer in litt. 2005). On 4
September 2005, one was heard and briefly seen in trees
between the headquarters and Danau Ranamese, with
another individual heard on the same evening at c. 1,350 m
near Poco Mandasawu (8°38'S 120°27'E; Fig. 1), c.5 km
south of Ruteng and in the same central range of mountains
as Danau Ranamese (M. Schellekens in litt. 2005).
VOCALISATIONS
The vocalisations we recorded can be split into two main
types.
Single calls: a single, short sharp call note, transcribed by
us as UH! was given at intervals of 1 .5-2.5 seconds (Fig.
2). Its fundamental frequency is at 0.6-0. 9 kHz, with
harmonics ranging from 1 . 5 to 4 kHz. It was often repeated
for several minutes at a time, and often by both members
of the pair in a duet. Occasionally the call was given by
one of the birds and the second would respond with a set
of soft clucking notes. Single calls were occasionally
interspersed with territorial calls.
Territorial calls-, these were the most commonly heard
vocalisations and comprised a very distinctive short burst
of loud, rapid staccato notes, transcribed as UH-UH-
UH-UH... (Fig. 2). Each ‘phrase’ contained 5-13 notes
(mean±S.D. = 1 1 .3±2.5, N = 48 phrases) delivered at a
rate of 8-10 notes/second (9. 1 ±0.7 notes/second, N = 48
phrases). In fundamental frequency, the individual notes
of the territorial call closely resemble the single calls (see
above), though they are characterised by less distinct
harmonics which range up to only 3 kHz. The phrases
were repeated at intervals of 1 .5-3.0 seconds for periods
of up to 15 minutes.
The territorial calls were often given in duet, sometimes
with both birds giving apparently identical calls, although
N
X
>
u
c
CD
D
CT
CD
Ll_
A
B
* 1 USSJMM'M
•y «y *% % ny * * » .
•,«!**(» M; Mr aj " M «t *1 Mr M m.
Time (seconds)
Figure 2. Sonograms generated from three recording made on Flores.
(A) Single note calls of Flores Scops Owl Otus alfredi, recorded at
1,200 m near Danau Ranamese, Flores, on 20 June 2005 (RH).
(B) A series of territorial calls from Flores Scops Owl, recorded at
1,200 m near Danau Ranamese, Flores, on 20 June 2005 (RH).
(C) Calls of unidentified species (either Flores Scops Owl or Red-
legged Crake Rallina fasciata) recorded at c. 900 m near Puarlolo,
Flores, on 5 October 1998 (R. Drijvers).
frequently one would give a variation of this call. This was
usually a softer version delivered at a lower volume, with
both the volume and timing of the individual notes varying
within each phrase such that the phrase seemed more
stuttering or jumbled. Occasionally the phrase would be
given very quietly, sounding like a series of fast clucking
sounds.
The calls of Flores Scops Owl are undoubtedly
very similar to those of Red-legged Crake. On Flores,
pairs of the latter apparently duet at night at intervals
of c.5 minutes at least during the breeding season
(October-January), and their vocalisations have been
described as a staccato series of gogogogogogogogo
notes, an aggressive and very sharp girm- Rf R! R! R! R!
and ‘a cacophony of scolding sounds when two
individuals meet’ (Schmutz 1977, 1978). In mainland
South-East Asia the territorial call is a loud rapid hard
6-9 note UH- UH- UH- UH- UH- UH . and is often
given during the night (Robson 2000, Rasmussen and
Anderton 2005).
In 1998, R. Drijvers heard vocalisations similar to
those described above at four sites in West Flores: 2-3
birds at c. 350 m near Paku (8°40'S 119°56'E) on 8
October; six birds at c.550 m at Cerang (8°40'S 1 1 9°54'E)
on 9 October; 5+ heard at c.900 m along the road leading
down from the telecommunications tower at Puarlolo in
the direction of Labuanbajo (8°35'S 119°57'E) on 5
October; and an unspecified number of birds close to the
headquarters and 0.5-1 km along the main road towards
Ruteng at c. 1,200 m at Danau Ranamese (8°38'S
120°33'E) on 26, 27 and 28 September.
Unfortunately the original sound recordings made by
R. Drijvers were lost, but some had already been added
to a compilation cassette. A number of these had been
recorded at Puarlolo (see Fig. 2), and others are of
uncertain provenance: either Danau Ranamese or
186
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 23 (2007)
Puarlolo. The recordings from Paku and Cerang were
lost completely.
In the Puarlolo recordings (Fig. 2), each series
comprised 7-18 notes (mean±S.D. = 13.5±2.4, N = 26
series) delivered at a rate of 6-9 notes/second (mean =
7.16±0.9, N = 26 series). This is very similar to our
recordings of Flores Scops Owl. Equally, these recordings
are almost identical in frequency parameters to those of
the territorial call of Flores Scops Owl as taped by us
around Danau Ranamese. In most of the recordings from
Puarlolo the first and/or last notes of the series were
distinctly quieter and softer than all the other notes in the
series, he. uh-UH-UH-UH-UH-....-UH-UH-UH-uh.
Single notes were also recorded at Puarlolo; these seem
to match exactly the single notes of Flores Scops Owl
from Danau Ranamese in both frequency and time
parameters.
Recordings of Red-legged Crake made by Craig
Robson at Khao Pra Bang Khram, Trang province,
Thailand on 1 May 1987 appear to have the quieter notes
described above in some of the series, but the recordings
are of insufficient quality to confirm this or to analyse the
length and rate of the series.
Further study is therefore required to confirm the
differences in vocalisations between the two species, and
the identity of the birds heard at Puarlolo remains
undetermined. Unlike those at Danau Ranamese and
Puarlolo, the birds heard at Paku and Cerang made calls
described as ‘a cacophony of sounds including screeches’
reminiscent of Amauromis spp.; therefore, we suggest that
these records refer to Red-legged Crake.
ANALYSIS
Despite considerable effort by several ornithologists, the
vocalisations of Flores Scops Owl have not previously
been recorded. The only prior field observations involved
a silent individual (Pilgrim et al. 2000), and it had been
speculated that the species may be largely silent, or silent
during the dry season when most attempts to locate it had
been made (Butchart et al. 1996).
Red-legged Crake is locally distributed on Flores,
occurring up to 650 m (Coates and Bishop 1997). Other
than the vocal records described above, the species is
known from a single bird collected in December 1888
near sea level at Maumere (8°37'S 22°12'E) by Weber,
and several subsequent records below 700 m and all during
the period 22 November to 22 March (Schmutz 1978,
Butchart et. al. 1994, Mees 2006). All the known records
of Flores Scops Owl are at c. 1 ,050-1 ,400 m in the Ruteng
and T odo mountain ranges in western Flores. It therefore
seems likely that there is no overlap in the elevational
ranges of Red-legged Crake and Flores Scops Owl.
It has been suggested that the restricted range of Flores
Scops Owl may be due in part to interspecific competition
with Moluccan Scops Owl Otus magicus albiventris
(BirdLife International 2001). In central and eastern
Flores, Moluccan Scops Owl has been recorded at higher
elevations: up to 1,000 m on Aegela (=‘Aegila’; 8°45'S
121° 21'E), 1,500 m on Keli Mutu (8°45'S 121°48'E),
and 1 ,000 m at Ili Wengot (8°29'S 1 22°40' E) (R. Drijvers
inlitt. 1999). In western Flores itwas previously considered
to occur up to only 500-600 m in the Ruteng area
(Ranamese, Poco Ranaka, Golo Lusang). However, on
27 and 28 June we recorded the vocalisations of at least
two Moluccan Scops Owls at c.940 m at the Puarlolo
telecommunications tower. Thus if there is competitive
exclusion between the two species, Flores Scops Owl
might be restricted to the wetter, western part of the
island above c. 1,000 m.
Our sightings were made in remnant large trees up to
300 m from untouched forest. These trees appeared to
form part of the birds’ territory, suggesting that Flores
Scops Owl may be tolerant of disturbed habitat where it
adjoins primary montane forest. However, it is important
that increased protection is afforded to the RutengNature
Recreation Park (which encompasses Danau Ranamese)
and other areas of remaining forest in West Flores. We
echo the recommendations by Butchart et al. (1996) for
the establishment of an upper-elevation evergreen
rainforest reserve on Flores, to protect the endemic species
(and distinctive subspecies) including 19 of the 25
restricted-range bird species known from Flores
(Stattersfield et al. 1998, BirdLife International 2001).
It seems likely that a lack of knowledge of the
vocalisations of Flores Scops Owl has led to the species
being under-recorded. Now that the vocalisations have
been described, it is hoped that surveys can be carried out
to establish the true status and distribution of this
enigmatic bird.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Raf Drijvers for providing sound recordings
from his surveys on Flores, useful references and detailed records of all
relevant sightings. Craig Robson kindly provided sound recordings of
Red-legged Crake. Both Mikael Bauer and Mark Schellekens provided
details of their successful searches following the initial discovery of the
birds. We are indebted to two anonymous reviewers for helpful
comments.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia. Cambridge, U.K.:
BirdLife International.
Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Davies, C. W. N., Dharmaputra,
G., Dutson,G. C. L.,Lowen, J. C., andSahu, A. (1994) Preliminary
report of the Cambridge Flores/Sumbawa Conservation Project
1993. Unpublished report.
Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Davies, C. W. N., Dharmaputra,
G., Dutson, G. C. L., Lowen, J. C., and Sahu, A. (1996) The
conservation status of forest birds on Flores and Sumbawa,
Indonesia. Bird Consent. Internal. 6: 335-370.
Coates, B. J., and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds ofWallacea:
Sulawesi, the Moluccas and the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia.
Alderley, Australia: Dove Publications.
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J., and Stattersfield, A. J. ( 1 994) Birds to watch
2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Mees, G. F. (2006) The avifauna of Flores (Lesser Sunda Islands).
Zool. Med. Leiden 80-3: 1-261.
Pilgrim, J. D., Leadley, J. D., and Saifuddin (2000) Bird surveys and
conservation status of four forests on Flores, Indonesia. Cambridge,
U.K.: CSB Conservation Publications.
Rasmussen, P. C., and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Washington, D.C. and Barcelona: Smithsonian
Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Forktail 23 (2007)
SHORT NOTES
187
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Schmutz, E. (1977) Die Vogel der Manggarai (Flores) . Ruteng, Flores:
privately published.
Schmutz, E. (1978) Addenda and corrigenda. Ruteng, Flores: privately
published.
Sibley, C. G., and Monroe Jr., B. L. (1993) A supplement to the distribution
and taxonomy of birds of the zvorld. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, M. J., and Wege, D. C. (1998)
Endemic Bird Areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation.
Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Widodo, W., Cox, J. H.,and Rasmussen P.C. (1999) Rediscovery of
the Flores Scops Owl Otus alfredi on Flores, Indonesia, and
reaffirmation of its specific status. Forktail 15: 15-23.
I
Forktail 23
2007
Guidelines for contributors
Forktail publishes original papers in the English language (also, in
certain cases, English translations of papers in Oriental languages)
treating any aspect of the ornithology (e.g. distribution, biology,
conservation, identification) of the region bounded by the Indus
River to the west, the Russian Far East, Korean Peninsula, Japan,
and Lydekker’s Line (i.e. the eastern boundary of Wallacea) to
the east, the Chagos Archipelago, Lesser Sundas, Christmas Island
and Cocos (Keeling) Islands to the south (see map in Oriental
Bird Club Bull. 31:7). Submissions are considered on the
understanding that they are being offered solely for publication
by the Oriental Bird Club, which will retain copyright. All
submissions are reviewed by referees and the Forktail Editorial
Committee, and those accepted are normally published in order
of receipt. (Some further indication of the type of material
appropriate for the journal is provided in the inaugural editorial,
‘The scope of Forktail ’, Forktail 1: 3-5.)
Submissions should be sent electronically as an email
attachment to mail@orientalbirdclub.org. If this is not possible,
manuscripts may be sent qn disk, preferably in PC format, to the
Senior Editor, Forktail, OBC, P.O. Box 324, Bedford, MK42
OWG, U.K. In both cases, the text, tables, figure legends and
appendices should be combined as a single Word file. Figures
(maps, diagrams, images etc.) should be sent as high-resolution
scans in standard file formats (JPEG, TIFF etc.) or, if this is not
possible, originals may be posted to the above address. Maps
should be marked with a scale and north arrow. The approximate
position of figures and tables should be indicated in the margin of
the typescript. Papers should be concise and factual, take full
account of previous relevant literature but avoid repetition of
established information as much as possible; opinions expressed
should be based on adequate evidence. Titles of papers must be
accurate and concise, and (for the benefit of abstraction services)
include any relevant scientific (taxonomic) name.
Whenever possible, authors should consult an issue of Forktail
for style and layout. Spelling follows The shorter Oxford English
dictionary, except that external features of birds are spelt and
hyphenated in accordance with the entry under ‘Topography’ in
A dictionary of birds (1985). Spelling of placenames accords (unless
another source is specified) with the most recent edition (currently
11th, 2003) of The Times atlas of the world ; we use ‘South-East
Asia’ and ‘Vietnam’. Localities with well-known other spellings
or older names should have these placed in parentheses after their
first mention. For localities too small to be in the Times atlas a
source of the spelling adopted should preferably be indicated and
the precise geographical coordinates provided (these should be
double-checked where possible). It is appreciated that authors will
not always have access to the above sources; in such cases the
editor will seek to introduce conformity.
English and scientific names of birds should follow those
provided by Inskipp,T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996)
An annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. On first
mention of a bird both English and scientific name should be given,
thereafter only one, preferably the English. Scientific trinominals
need be used only if subspecific nomenclature is relevant to the
topic under discussion. These recommendations also apply for any
other animal or plant species mentioned.
Italics are used for all words of foreign languages, including
generic and specific scientific names. Metric units and their
international symbols should be used; if it is necessary to cite other
systems of measurement, these can be added in parentheses.
Temperatures should be given in the Centigrade (Celsius) scale.
Numbers one to ten are written in full except when linked with a
measurement abbreviation or higher number, thus ‘five birds’ but
‘5 km’ and ‘5-12 birds’; numerals are used for all numbers above
ten, four-figure numbers and above using the comma thus: ‘1,234’,
‘12,345’. Single quotation marks are to be used. Details of
experimental technique, extensive tabulations of results, etc., are
best presented as appendices.
Authors of papers containing statistical analysis should observe
the provisions of the relevant section of ‘Notice to contributors’
in a recent Ibis. Dates should be written 1 January 1985, times of
day as 08h30, 17h55 (24-hour clock), etc. When citing a
conversation (‘verbally’) or letter (‘ in litt.'), the contact’s name
and initials should be included, preferably with the year of
communication. A full-length paper must include a summary not
exceeding 5% of the total length. Authors of papers are encouraged
to offer their work to one or more ornithologist or biologist for
critical assessment prior to submission to Forktail. Such help as is
received should naturally be mentioned in an acknowledgement
section before the full references are presented.
References in the text should follow the form ‘(Campbell and
Lack 1985)’ and ‘King et al. (1975) suggest...’. More than one
within the same parentheses should be chronologically listed,
alphabetically if of the same year. Publications by the same authors
in the same year may be distinguished by ‘a’, ‘b’, etc., after the
date. Full references must be listed alphabetically at the end in
the form:
Campbell, B. and Lack, E. eds. (1985) A dictionary of birds. Calton,
Staffordshire, U.K.: T. and A. D. Poyser.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M.W. (1975) A
field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Kuroda, Nh., ed. (1984) Ketteiban seibutsu daizukan;chorui
[Illustrations of animals and plants: birds] . Tokyo: Sekai
Bunkasha. (In Japanese.)
Rosljakov, G. E. (1985) [‘Information on the distribution and
numbers of Aix galericulata and Mergus squamatus over
Chabarovsk Territory.’] Pp. 101-102 in N. M. Litvinenko,
ed. Rare and endangered birds of the Far Fast. Vladivostok: Far
East Science Center, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. (In
Russian.)
Sien Yao-hua, Kuan Kuan-Hsun and Zheng Zuo-xin (1964) [‘An
avifaunal survey of the Chinghai province.’] Acta Zool. Sinica
16: 690-709. (In Chinese.)
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Borneo. Third edition. Kota
Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur: The Sabah Society and the
Malayan Nature Society.
Somadikarta, S. (1986) Collocalia linchi Horsfield & Moore - a
revision. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 106: 32-40.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea
( Sulawesi , the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia) :
an annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list no. 7).
It will be noted from these examples that references to non-
Roman scripts need to be transliterated and/or translated (or even,
with more recondite sources, both); either the transliterated title
may be left as it is, or a translation of it can be substituted in
square brackets (but where an abstract provides its own English
title, this may be cited in inverted commas within square brackets),
and the language involved should follow the reference, in
parentheses.
The author’s name, postal address and email address should
appear in italics at the end of the article.
Authors will receive proofs for checking, which they are
required to return within one week of receipt. All joint
communications must indicate the name and email address of the
author to whom proofs should be sent. Textual changes in proof
cannot normally be countenanced. Pdfs of the published pages
are available to authors on request.
Layout and typesetting by Peter Creed, Oxford, UK • peter@naturebureau.co.uk
Colour repro and printing by Crowes Complete Print, UK • (01603) 403349 • sales@crowes.co.uk
Journal of Asian Ornithology
Forktail 24
2008
OBC Council
Stephen Browne (Chairman, Conservation Committee)
Nigel Collar (Chairman, Publications Committee)
Mike Edgecombe (Promotions)
Paul French (Publicity)
John Gregory
Tim Loseby (Art and Photographic Editor)
Steve Rowland (Chairman)
Tony Sawbridge (Secretary)
Graeme Spinks (Treasurer)
Brian Sykes (Admin)
Margaret Sykes (Membership Secretary)
Jo Thomas (Promotions)
Richard Thomas (Advertising)
Alan Wilkinson (Internet)
Publications Committee
Stuart Butchart, Nigel Collar, Tim Loseby, Rene Pop, Suhel Quader,
Nigel Redman, Brian Sykes, Richard Thomas
Conservation Committee
Nick Brickie, Stephen Browne, Dave Buckingham, Mike Crosby,
John Fellowes, Geoff Hilton, Jim Wardill, Simon Wotton
OBC Representatives
Susan Myers (Australia)
Paul Thompson (Bangladesh)
Filip Verbelen (Belgium)
Keo Omaliss (Cambodia)
Tony Gaston (Canada)
Ding Chang-qing (China)
Jiri Mlikovsky (Czech Republic)
Torben Lund (Denmark)
Hannu Jannes (Finland)
Axel Braunlich (Austria and Germany)
Richard Lewthwaite (Hong Kong)
Asad Rahmani and Vishnu Singh (India)
Ria Saryanthi (Indonesia)
Chris Murphy (Ireland)
Carlo Violani (Italy)
Akira Hibi (Japan)
Jin-Young Park (Korea)
Mike Chong and Ooi Chin Hock (Malaysia)
Charles Anderson (Maldives)
Nyambayar Batbayar (Mongolia)
Tony Htin Hla (Myanmar [Burma])
Yub Raj Basnet (Nepal)
Jelle Scharringa and Bas van Balen (Netherlands)
Jan 0ve Gjershaug (Norway)
Aleem Ahmed Khan (Pakistan)
Carmela Espanola and Arne Jensen (Philippines)
Ray Tipper (Portugal)
Fang Woei-horng (Taiwan)
Lim Kim Seng (Singapore)
Adam Riley (South Africa)
Sarath Kotagama and Upali Ekanayake (Sri Lanka)
Per Alstrom (Sweden)
Beat Wartmann (Switzerland)
Philip Round (Thailand)
Robert Kennedy (USA)
Jonathan Eames and Nguyen Cu (Vietnam)
The Oriental Bird Club has been established for ornithologists
throughout the world, both amateur and professional, who share
a common interest in the region’s birds and wish to assist in
their conservation.
The Club aims to:
• Promote interest in the birds of the Oriental Region and
their conservation
• Liaise with, and promote the work of, existing regional
organisations
• Collate and publish material on Oriental birds
For Oriental nationals resident in the region.
We encourage all members to pay the full
rate if they can afford it
Supporting Member £25 p.a
Funding one Oriental member in addition
to Ordinary membership
Libraries and Academic Institutions £25 p.a.
Business Supporter £45 p.a
The Oriental Bird Club is a Registered Charity No. 297242
For further information please write to:
Oriental Bird Club, P.O. Box 324, Bedford MK42 OWG, U.K.
OBC Email address OBC Web Site
mail@orientalbirdclub . org http ://www. orientalbirdclub . org/
The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of Oriental Bird Club concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Cover picture: Male Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus,
Sundarbans East Sanctuary, Bangladesh, April 2002.
Photograph by Gertud & Helmut Denzau.
ISSN 0950-1746
© Oriental Bird Club 2008
FORKTAIL
Number 24, 2008
Senior Editor:
Suhel Quader
(National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India)
Associate Editors:
Stuart Butchart, Will Duckworth, Eben Goodale and Jack Tordoff
THE NATURAL
HISTORY '■r\ ‘SEUM
1 9 S!!G 2008
PURCHASED
Tp'ING LIBRARY
CONTENTS
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan . 1
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Are-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna: correcting a ‘founder effect’ in perceptions . 25
LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu island, central Philippines . 48
YONG DING LI and CHAIYAN KASORNDORKBUA
The status of the Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis in South-East Asia . 57
PETER R. KENNERLEY, DAVID N. BAKEWELL and PHILIP D. ROUND
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia . 63
YANG LIU, ZHENG-WANG ZHANG, JIAN-QIANG LI, YU ZHANG, SHAN LU
and XIANG-FENG RUAN
A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China . 80
G. NEUMANN-DENZAU, E. FAHRNI MANSUR and R. MANSUR
Nests, eggs, hatchlings and behaviour of the Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus from the Sundarbans
in Bangladesh, with first nesting observations . 92
SABIR BIN MUZAFFAR, JOHN Y. TAKEKAWA, DIANN J. PROSSER, DAVID C. DOUGLAS,
BAOPING YAN, ZHI XING, YUANSHENG HOU, ERIC C. PALM and SCOTT H. NEWMAN
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls Larus ichthyaetus from Qinghai Lake, China . 100
Short Notes
JACK H. COX and DIRGA S. RAI
The first documented nest of Rufous-breasted Bush Robin Tarsiger hyperythrus, from east Nepal . 108
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
Black Baza Aviceda leuphotes: first confirmed record for Bhutan . 109
A. T. PETERSON and R. G. MOYLE
An appraisal of recent taxonomic reappraisals based on character scoring systems . 110
N. J. COLLAR
Subjectivity and space in evaluating species limits: a response to Peterson and Moyle . 1 12
D. N. S. ALLEN and N. J. COLLAR
Rallus mirificus and Mimizuku gumeyi deleted from the avifauna of Samar, Philippines . 113
HEM SAGAR BARAL
Birds of Jagdishpur Reservoir, Nepal . 1 15
BEN ICING and CRAIG ROBSON
The taxonomic status of the three subspecies of Greater Rufous-headed Parrotbill Paradoxomis ruficeps . 120
2 COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN Forktail 24 (2008)
Lungtenphu along the Thim Chhu River. This was where
we recorded the more systematic data on breeding biology
of various species. Lungtenphu (2,300 m) is a small
settlement in the Thimphu valley a few kilometres
downstream from Thimphu. The valley is here c.l km
wide, with steep mountains rising to 4,000 m on both
sides . The area is now urbanising, but it was a rice-growing
area during our stay there. There are also apple and
walnut orchards, while the mountain slopes are covered
with blue pine Pinus wallichiana. The Thim Chhu
River flows through a gorge on the northern part and
widens out near Babesa, where sewerage ponds were
created in 1996. These ponds attract many migrating
ducks. Along the riverbank is a remnant of riverine shrubs
and trees. Dominant species are mulberry Moms australis
and Ligustmm indicum, with the climbing Himalayan musk
rose Rosa bmnonii covering large parts of the shrubs.
Besides the records around Lungtenphu, regular data
were collected in other locations in the Thimphu Valley,
including the Gidakom forests, the high altitudes around
Phajoding, the forests north of Thimphu and the area
around the Dochula (‘la’ = mountain pass). Otherwestern
birding areas visited with some regularity were the Chelaila
between Ha and Paro, the Paro Valley, the Punakha-
Wangdue Valley and Phobjika Valley. In addition, more
than 50 trips of 1 -2 weeks were made to the central, eastern
and southern districts of Bhutan. Major locations visited
are listed in Appendix 2. We also did some preliminary
tape playbacks.
In addition to our own observations, we also compiled
records from published literature and tour reports in recent
years, leading to additions or status changes. Breeding
status was accorded following the criteria and terminology
of Hagemeijer and Blair (1997, cf. Spierenburg 2005).
These criteria are described in Table 1 . We added criterion
17 to allow for data obtained from dissected birds as
recorded in older literature, like Ludlow and Kinnear
(1937). Scientific names are presented only for species
not listed in Appendix 1 .
RESULTS
During our stay in Bhutan, we collected data relevant to
the breeding status of 64 species (see Breeding records,
1990-2000, below). Recent published and unpublished
observations of others led to an additional 13 changes to
the breeding list (see Further additions to the breeding
list, below). We also found five previously overlooked
confirmed breeding records from Ludlow and Kinnear
(1937) and Ali et al. (1996). A complete list of birds
breeding in Bhutan is presented in Appendix 1 . This list
describes the present status and status changes and also
the criteria on which the assessments were based.
As compared with Spierenburg (2005), the following
ten species were added to the list of confirmed breeding
birds: Greater Coucal, Snow Pigeon, Plain-backed
Thrush, Hodgson’s Redstart, White-throated Redstart,
White-bellied Redstart, Siberian Stonechat, Chestnut¬
tailed Starling, Wallcreeper and Grey-crested Tit. In the
category probable breeders, ten species were added: Pale¬
headed Woodpecker, Savanna Nightjar, White-breasted
Waterhen, Eurasian Blackbird, Sapphire Flycatcher, Blue-
capped Redstart, Black-faced Laughingthrush, White-
browed Scimitar Babbler, Great Parrotbill and Dark¬
breasted Rosefmch.
Thirty-one species were upgraded from probable
breeding (Spierenburg 2005) to confirmed breeding: Hill
Partridge, Blyth’s Tragopan, Grey-capped Pygmy
Woodpecker, Crested Kingfisher, Blue-bearded Bee-
eater, Eurasian Cuckoo, Lesser Cuckoo, Plaintive
Cuckoo, Mountain Scops Owl, Eurasian Sparrowhawk,
Amur Falcon, Peregrine Falcon, Eurasian Jay, Lesser
Racket-tailed Drongo, Gould’s Shortwing, White-browed
Shortwing, Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher, Little Pied
Flycatcher, Slaty-blue Flycatcher, Pale Blue Flycatcher,
Oriental Magpie Robin, Blue-fronted Redstart, Little
Forktail, Rusty-flanked Treecreeper, Rufous-frontedTit,
Common Tailorbird, Striated Laughingthrush, Rufous-
vented Yuhina, Oriental Skylark, Yellow-breasted
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
3
Table 2. Summary of numbers of breeding birds in Bhutan in three
categories, according to the strength of evidence for breeding.
Breeding birds Total
Possible Probable Confirmed
Greenfinch and White-browed Rosefinch. Upgraded from
possible breeding (Spierenburg, 2005) to confirmed
breeding were the T awny Fish Owl, White-browed Wagtail
and Scaly-breasted Munia. Upgraded from possible
breeding to probable breeding was the Yellow-bellied
Warbler. The additions and status changes as compared
with Spierenburg (2005)'are summarised in Table 2.
BREEDING RECORDS, 1990-2000
In this section, we present information on breeding of
various species that we collected during 1 990-2000. The
64 species listed include species found breeding in Bhutan
for the first time, species for which the evidence points to
an upgraded breeding status and species for which
breeding has only occasionally been reported. For various
common breeders, including Ibisbill, Oriental Turtle
Dove, Black Bulbul, Eurasian Cuckoo and Brown Dipper
new information is provided on breeding biology. Our
observations are preceded by a summary of information
on that species given by Spierenburg (2005; here referred
to simply as ‘Spierenburg’) and other authors.
Hill Partridge Arborophila torqueola
Abundant, but sight records are rare, and there are no
confirmed breeding records (Spierenburg) . We regularly
heard it calling in western and central Bhutan in relatively
wet hemlock Tsuga dumosa or fir Abies densa forests, on
north-facing hills, between 2,800 and 3,400 m. A local
hunter in Tongmijangsa (Trashi Yangtse) told us in 1996
that it is a common breeding gamebird. On 7 July 1996,
we saw a group of at least 12, including half-grown
juveniles, running for cover on the trail to Lungchuusi,
Dochula, Thimphu (3,200 m) in mixed forest. This
confirms breeding.
Darjeeling Woodpecker Dendrocopos darjellensis
Spierenburg describes it as a resident bird, with records
of displaying birds in March and May, while a pair was
seen excavating a nest hole on 28 April at 2,200 m. We
have a record of a pair feeding vocal young birds in a nest
hole, about 3 m high, on 4 June 1 993, in mature Hemlock
forest near Daji Dzong, Thimphu at 2,400 m. The
breeding status is confirmed.
Pale-headed Woodpecker Gecinulus grantia
Baker (1927) states that this species is found in almost
any kind of forest or jungle, but prefers mixed bamboo
and scrub jungle, or the secondary growth found in
abandoned rice fields. According to Ah (1977), it is
resident, not uncommon, but local, up to 1,000 m in
bamboo and mixed moist-deciduous secondary forest.
However, Ali etal. (1996) give only one record for Batase,
Zhemgang, 1,375 m, on 6 March 1967. Spierenburg
considers it an uncommon or rare resident between 600
and 1,400 m. He regards the link with bamboo pockets
as essential.
On 4 June 1996, we saw a pair drumming and
displaying in chir pine Pinus roxburghii forest above
Lobeysa (Wangdue) at 1,300 m. This indicates probable
breeding in the area. Although some bamboo occurs in
the area, the pine forest habitat was rather different from
the habitat described by earlier authors. In the same tree,
we again saw a pair on 1 November 1996. These are
unusual records; however, the birds were seen at close
range and the characters (size, red-brown wings and
upperparts, olive-green underparts, pale bill and reddish
crown in male) exclude other possible species.
Crested Kingfisher Megaceryle lugubris
A common altitudinal migrant; no confirmed breeding
records, but the widespread presence of pairs in March-
April suggests that it is a regular breeder (Spierenburg).
Woodall (2001) describes the nest site in Japan to be a
tunnel of 2-3 m long, in a vertical bank at least 2 m high.
In Lungtenphu, a pair was always present from 1990 to
2000, although most of our observations were of single
birds. Most calling was heard in February. On 1 April
1997, a displaying pair was seen sitting on a stone in
the river, with their tails cocked and crests erect. On 3 and
5 March 1 998 a pair was seen repeatedly entering a crack
in a vertical rock, c.3 m above the river. This rock was
located at the foot of a steep, south-facing rock, with
some high grass, low bushes and dispersed blue pine. On
25 March 1 998, a single bird was seen entering the same
crack, and remained inside. The nesting site could not be
reached, but from the behaviour of the kingfishers it was
clear that this was the nest site, which confirms breeding.
We saw another displaying pair on 7 December 1997
along the Mo Chhu River at Punakha (1,400 m) calling
and chasing each other. Although a striking bird, this
kingfisher can be quite secretive and difficult to observe.
Blue-bearded Bee-eater Nyctyomis athertoni
An occasionally recorded resident, but no confirmed
breeding so far. A displaying pair was seen on 3 April at
1,800 m (Spierenburg) . On 1 6 September 1 994, we found
a nest hole in sandy soil, in a roadside hill 3 m above the
road, at T rongsa Viewpoint (2, 1 00 m), a place surrounded
by shrub vegetation and agricultural land. Both adults
were entering the hole several times with food, which
confirmed breeding. One week later, the birds were still
feeding their young in the nest hole. Holmes (1996) found
Blue-bearded Bee-eaters feeding their young in a nest 40
km west of Mongar in May 1996. McFadden (2005)
recorded on 5 April 2005 a pair of Blue-bearded Bee-
eaters perched close to their nest hole in a sandy road
embankment between Sengor and Yonkhola. According
to Grimmett et al. (1998), these bee-eaters breed from
February to August. Our (late) September record extends
this breeding period.
Eurasian Cuckoo Cuculus canorus
This species is a common summer visitor, with birds
maintaining territories in spring; no hosts are described
from Bhutan (Spierenburg). On 3 June 2000, we saw a
copulating pair of Eurasian Cuckoos at Lungtenphu.
Juvenile cuckoos were seen on various occasions. From 1 8
4
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
to 25 June 1995, a cuckoo attended by Black Bulbuls was
observed. On 14 June 1998, another young cuckoo, also
brought up by Black Bulbuls, was seen. On 25 June 1996,
a young cuckoo was found in the nest of a Grey-backed
Shrike, which confirms the breeding status. Many fights
between cuckoos and Black Bulbuls defending their nest
were noted. Fights occurred over several days and the
feathers of the female cuckoo suffered visibly. In Kanglung
(2,000 m), we saw a Red-vented Bulbul chasing a cuckoo
on 27 April 1994. On 9 June 2000, a cuckoo was chased
out of the territory of a White-collared Blackbird at
Lungtenphu.
Ali and Ripley (1987a) described the Brown Dipper
as ‘frequently’ brood-parasitised by the Eurasian Cuckoo.
Ali ( 1 967) lists two cases of Brown Dippers parasitised by
cuckoos (at least once Eurasian Cuckoo) in Kashmir. In
Europe, the Eurasian Cuckoo very rarely selects a dipper
as host (Tyler and Ormerod 1994). In Lungtenphu, we
never noted interactions between the Brown Dipper and
Eurasian Cuckoo. The Eurasian Cuckoo arrives in the
Thimphu Valley in the second half of April, after the main
breeding season of the Brown Dipper.
We heard the Eurasian Cuckoo calling in a variety of
habitats, but mostly in areas with agricultural land and
orchards. Several times a cuckoo was seen feeding on
large caterpillars of the wild silk moth Bombyx mandarina
in mulberry trees. Other birds were not seen feeding on
these caterpillars. The Eurasian Cuckoo leaves Thimphu
valley before the end of August. A late record was on 1 5
September 1999 in Jakar, Bumthang at 2,600 m.
Plaintive Cuckoo Cacomantis merulinus
Uncommon, but quite widespread (Spierenburg). On 1—
2 October 1991, we saw a recently fledged juvenile at
Trashigang, in the garden of the Kelling Lodge (1,200
m), which confirmed breeding. It was sitting rather
forlornly in the bushes and did not move around much
during the two days that we saw it. This species is known
as a parasite of the Common Tailorbird, which was
breeding in the same locality. The lodge lies on a dry and
sunny cliff with grass, shrubs, bamboo and ornamental
trees. At the same location, an adult was seen on 18-19
May 1995. We saw another individual in the forest of
Khangma on 17 April 1996.
DRONGO CUCKOO Sumiculus lugubris
A common summer visitor, whose calls reach a peak from
late April to mid-May (Spierenburg). We observed a
mating pair early in the morning in the forest above
Khangma (2,200 m) on 21 April 1996. This indicates
probable breeding. The forest is in the upper region of the
warm broadleaf forest and, although exploited for food
and firewood, is still rich in birdlife.
GREATER COUCAL Centropus sinensis
Uncommon resident with a scattered distribution
(Spierenburg). On 12 September 1990, we heard several
individuals calling in a rice-growing area near Lodrai,
Sarpang at 300 m. On 1 October 1 99 1 , a recently fledged
juvenile Greater Coucal was seen in a mandarin orchard
at Rongthung, Trashigang (2,000 m). It was perched in
a tree and was observed for quite some time. It did not
look ready yet to fly over any distance. This confirms
breeding. Grimmett et al. (1998) state that the Greater
Coucal can breed almost all year round. In the same
location, an adult was seen and heard calling on 1
November 1994. On 20 June 1993, an adult was seen at
Lungtenphu and on 27 April 1994, another was seen in
a forest (1,300 m) near Amshing, Samdrup Dzongkhar.
Grey Nightjar Caprimulgus indicus
Frequent throughout the temperate zone, but no
confirmed breeding records (Spierenburg). From early
March to early July we heard this species calling at night
at Lungtenphu. In March, the calling was most frequent
and birds were heard calling almost all night long. This
indicates probable breeding. Cleere (1999) says that
breeding in the Himalaya occurs from March to June.
Breeding most likely took place on the dry grassy slope
above the apple orchard, but no nest could be found.
Once, a Grey Night jar was flushed during the daytime. At
night, we saw the birds hunting over the river or following
each other low over the road. There appeared to be several
present at once, but it was hard to count actual numbers
as they would fly up and down a track continuously. Other
calling records were from Lobeysa, Jakar and Trashigang.
Savanna Nightjar Caprimulgus ajfinis
Rare in Bhutan (Spierenburg). On 30 April 1996, and
also on other occasions in April-May, this species was
regularly heard calling at night in the forests of Pemagatshel
District (1,200-1,600 m). This indicates probable
breeding. The habitat consisted of forest and open
woodland interspersed with arable land and orchards.
Cleere (1999) says that breeding in the Himalayas occurs
from April to August.
Snow Pigeon Columba leuconota
A common altitudinal migrant, but no confirmed breeding
records (Spierenburg) . We found a nest above Dawakha,
Paro, on a steep overhanging cliff, c.3 m above the road,
on 30 April 2000, at 3,400 m in an area with open hemlock
and rhododendron forest. The adult remained brooding
on the nest, which was made of grass. Its breeding status
is now confirmed.
Oriental Turtle Dove Strepwpelia orientals
An abundant species, but only two breeding records
(Spierenburg). We found many nests at Lungtenphu. The
doves arrived in February (first date: 5 February), mostly
alone, but sometimes in a group. Breeding started in March
(first date: 7 March). The nests were constructed in blue
pines or mulberry bushes, c.3 m above the ground, with
the branches often overhanging the river. Nests consisted
of a small number of twigs. The doves nested throughout
the summer. The last record for a nest with eggs was on
1 8 September, when a nest with two eggs was found, two
being the usual number of eggs. This breeding period
considerably extends earlier reported periods, e.g. May to
July in Grimmett et al. (1998). From the first week of
November, the doves left. This corresponded to an increase
in numbers in the Wangdue Valley, which lies 1,000 m
lower.
WHITE-BREASTED Waterhen Amauromis Phoenicians
A rare resident (Spierenburg). On 27 April 1994 at
Kanglung, we heard a White-breasted Waterhen calling.
In the period 8-2 1 May 1995, a waterhen was heard calling
in a marsh at Kanglung College, while another was heard
calling in a village pond in Khangma (2,100 m). Calling
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
5
was loud and prolonged and heard on most days, indicating
probable breeding. We have two records for this bird in
Lungtenphu, one seen on 26 April 1997 and another on
1 June 1997 between the rocks along the Thim Chhu
River.
Black-tailed Crake Porzana bicolor
Uncommon resident; local residents have reported nests
(Spierenburg). We found it common in the rice fields and
little ponds around Lungtenphu and Semtokha. A clear
indication of breeding at Lungtenphu was the regular
calling at night in spring.
Ruddy-breasted Crake Porzana fusca
Rare resident, known from Thimphu, Paro and
Lingmethang. Y oung were seen at T ashichho Dzong and
a dead juvenile was found at Babesa (Spierenburg). On
20 August 1990, we saw apparent and two pulli (1-2 days
old) at Semtokha. The species appeared to be not
uncommon in this rice-growing area. In spring, we heard
it calling in Lungtenphu, mostly at night. Towards the
end of May, it was also heard calling during the day, in
dense vegetation at the riverside. In October 1999, a young
bird was regularly seen near the sewerage ponds at Babesa,
where we also found a dead juvenile. In eastern Bhutan,
we heard the species calling in Khangma (2, 1 00 m) on 16
May 1996, also during the day. It was seen in Khangma
on 18 April 1996. On 8 November 1996, we saw this
crake in Kanglung in a marshy area.
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
Common winter visitor and migrant (Spierenburg). One
breeding record in Bumdeling, where young were seen on
2 May 2000 (Sherub 2000). We found it breeding at
Lungtenphu, where it was seen all year round, except for
June and July when the river was in flood. On 20 April
1991 at Babesa, we searched in vain on gravel banks for
the nests of two pairs giving a broken-wing display. This
confirmed breeding for the area. At the time, the sewerage
ponds at Babesa were not yet created, while the marshy
areas and gravel banks were more extensive. On 8 May
1991, one individual was seen giving a broken-wing display
in front of a cat at Lungtenphu. We thought the bird might
be nesting in the bushes near the rocky riverbank, but
could find no nest. On 4 May 1 994, we again failed to find
a likely nest in the same spot as in May 1991 . Courtship
display was seen at Babesa on 30 January and 19-20
February 2000.
IBISBILL Ibidoryncha struthersii
Knystautas ( 1 996) gives an elevational breeding range of
500-4,400 m for this species, with wintering birds being
found down to 100 m. For pair formation, March-April
is given, after which breeding territories are formed.
Knystautas states that egg-laying was observed from April
to mid-May and hatching from mid-May to June, while
birds stay on the breeding ground until October. However,
Spierenburg (2005) named the Ibisbill as an early breeder,
with chicks observed from late March to mid-May. We
found that Ibisbills were present year-round, although
numbers declined in the summer. In Babesa, numbers
increased again from October; birds occurred in family
groups until early December. During December and
January, Ibisbills gathered in loose group of up to 20
individuals. Courtship display was seen from mid-January
to mid-February. At this time, individuals, rather quietly,
showed off their colours, which are brightest from end-
December until end-February. The Ibisbill is a rather
silent bird, but calling was heard from December to July,
especially from March to May. We also heard calling at
night. Ibisbills are secretive during the breeding season,
and easily overlooked. Some individuals did not flush until
approached to 3 m. At Babesa, the first behaviour indicating
breeding was noticed at the end of January. On 30 January
2000, three pairs tried to distract us. Distraction behaviour,
including attacking, continued during February and
March. Late dates on which distraction behaviour was
noted were between 29 April and 17 May. On 28 March
2000, a pair with two almost fully grown chicks was seen
at Babesa. This is clear proof that laying can already start
in the second half of January and confirms Spierenburg’s
views. A juvenile, not yet fully fledged, was noted on 2
June 1995. Therefore, the breeding season of the Ibisbill
at Babesa is prolonged and it is possible that an unsuccessful
nesting attempt is followed by a second brood. On 20
April 1991, we saw a man collecting Ibisbill eggs near
Babesa, while the adults followed him, displaying and
calling. Most (but not all) Ibisbills leave their breeding
grounds in June, retuning in October. The species is
sensitive to disturbance. During the construction of the
sewerage system at Babesa, the Ibisbills moved away, but
they returned towards the end of 1997.
Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus
Uncommon summer visitor, with a first record of a pair
with chicks in August 2003 (Spierenburg) . On 1 8 February
1 999, we saw for the first time a Red-wattled Lapwing at
Babesa sewerage ponds, chasing River Lapwings. On 7
March 1999, we saw six individuals, again chasing River
Lapwings. Two pairs were territorial, but only one pair
remained on the site. On 16 May 1999, we tried to find
a nest or juveniles. The male and female called loudly and
tried to lead us away. This was on the dry, northern bank,
c.20 m above the river, in a rocky area with low bushes.
The following year, one pair returned to the same place
on 20 February, and on 28 March two pairs were present.
It appears that this species is expanding its breeding range
to the higher-altitude Thimphu Valley.
Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus
Common; displaying birds were seen in the central valley
in April, giving it probable breeding status (Spierenburg) .
In Lingmethang, Mongar (600 m), we recorded one
juvenile on 21 May 1995. On 7 October 1997, one adult
with two begging juveniles was seen near the Motithang
radio mast (2,800 m) in open blue pine forest. This
confirms breeding. At Lungtenphu, this species was seen
all year round, hunting birds and mice. Nesting likely
occurred higher up on the mountain slope. On 1 May
1 999, a Eurasian Sparrowhawk with a Hoopoe in its talons
flew over the river towards a rocky area with sparse trees
where we assumed its nest was. Grimmett et al. (1998)
recorded breeding in the northern, mountainous regions
of the subcontinent from April to June. Second broods
have not been reported, but replacement broods are not
uncommon (Glutz et al. 1971, Roberts 1991). Especially
at higher altitudes breeding can be later in the season, as
exemplified by a nest with eggs on 23 June in Gilgit
(Roberts 1991), fresh eggs on 1 9 June and nestlings on 1 0
August (Glutz et al. 1971). Parents feed the young until
6
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
one month after they leave the nest. Our October record
is very late but is consistent with previous records.
BLACK Eagle Ictinaetus malayensis
One record of a Black Eagle carrying nest material in
October and one eagle seen on a nest in April
(Spierenburg). On 9 October 1993, we saw one juvenile
at the Pelela, in Wangdue. On 6 July 1997, at Cheri,
Thimphu (2,600 m), an adult was seen bringing prey to
a nest on a high ridge above cool broadleaf forest. The
eagle landed on a nest structure consisting of many
branches, and partly hidden between rocks and trees.
Breeding is now confirmed. In Lungtenphu, we regularly
saw a Black Eagle hunting. This is likely to have been the
same bird as the one breeding at Cheri because it had the
same primaries missing on its wings . The distance between
the two locations is c. 1 5 km. On 7 November 1 999, one
adult and two juveniles were seen at Phajoding Gonpa,
Thimphu (3,700 m) hunting above weeping blue juniper
Juniperus recurva and Rhododendron forest. Thiollay ( 1 994)
says the clutch size is one, rarely two. Grimmett et al.
(1998) give November to April as the breeding period.
Roberts (1991) records a nest for 29 April.
Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
Rare autumn passage migrant; one pair probably breeding
at Drukyel Dzong in 2000-2001 (Spierenburg). On 18
August 1990, we found a nest with young birds in a tall
weeping cypress ( Tsenden tree) Cupressus comeyana at
Drukyel Dzong (Paro, 2,400 m) and on 17 April 1994, a
nest with young birds was seen again at the same location.
On 26 April 1997, we heard young falcons at Drukyel
Dzong. Breeding is now confirmed. We made additional
confirmed records of male and female Amur Falcons in
this location in 1993 (August), 1994 (September), 1995
(June), 1996 (October), 1999 (January) and 2000 (April).
Isolated breeding records exist for north-eastern India
(Grewal et al. 2002), but are disputed (Naoroji 2006).
Thiollay (1994) gives May-June as the breeding period,
so our records are both early and late. Naoroji (2006)
gives late April for nests with eggs in north-eastern India.
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
Frequently recorded, one pair probably breeding near
Zhemgang (Spierenburg). We found a nest on 1
November 1 996, high up on the western side of the temple
of the Natural Resources Training Institute, above
Lobeysa (1,300 m). The area is surrounded by chir pine
forest and is close to the Sunkosh River. Breeding was
confirmed as both parents were seen bringing food to
their noisy young. Grimmett etal. (1998) give December-
May as breeding period for the Indian subcontinent, so
our observation of nestlings on 1 November constitutes
a very early record. This might be linked to the fact that,
in autumn, prey like doves and waterfowl are abundant
in the area.
Eurasian Jay Garrulus glandarius
Common altitudinal migrant, no confirmed breeding
records (Spierenburg); juveniles collected on 1 July
(Ludlow and Kinnear 1937). We noted three
unaccompanied juveniles eating kitchen waste in
Lungtenphu on 2 1 October 1 994. On 2 1 February 1 999,
a group of 20 adults was seen at Luweri, Dochula,
Thimphu, displaying noisily. On 18 May 2000 at Dochula
(3,000 m) and on 1 1 June 2000 at Gidakom (Thimphu,
2,800 m), family groups, including recently fledged
juveniles were seen. In spring, we heard singing jays on
several occasions in cool broadleaf forest as well as in
Hemlock forests in West Bhutan. This species is now a
confirmed breeder, as our observations of recently fledged
juveniles in May and June (and even Ludlow’s 1 July
record) can only refer to local breeding. In addition,
Farrow (2007) recorded a pair of the interstinctus
subspecies collecting nest material at the roadside near
Trongsa in April 2007.
White-throated Dipper Cinclus cinclus
Common altitudinal migrant; a juvenile observed on 1
June at Lhuntse (3,650 m) is the only evidence for breeding
(Spierenburg). On 19 May 1996 in the Phobjika valley
(2,800 m), we found a White-throated Dipper behaving
as if it had a nest. The assumed nest site was along a small
stream with overhanging banks almost 1 m high. The
overhanging parts consisted of dense grassy vegetation;
we failed to locate the nest between rocks just under this
overhang. The stream was bordered by low but dense
vegetation of Rhododendron thomsonii and dwarf bamboo
Arundinaria mating, which covers large parts of the
Phobjika valley. During the time that we were searching
for the nest, the dipper kept circling around, returned
several times and then disappeared again.
Brown Dipper Cinclus pallasii
Apparently double-brooded; six territorial pairs at Taba
along 1 . 5 km river (Spierenburg) . Most of the 20 nests we
found from 1 990 to 2000 at Lungtenphu and Babesa were
inside retaining walls, in holes under the bridge or in cracks
in rocks. Four nests were inside holes in sandbanks, but
we did not see the birds digging these tunnels. In
Lungtenphu, Brown Dippers used much deeper nest holes
than recorded elsewhere or for other dipper species. As
nesting material, dippers used green algae Prasiola
fortnosana , grass and other leaves. Nest building took a few
days. We saw dippers wetting the grass in the river, before
bringing it to the nest. We noted this behaviour also with
strips of a woven polypropylene cement bag. A bird was
seen tearing it loose from the bag with some effort; then
it went to the river and wetted it several times before
taking it into the hole. Brown Dippers bred during late
winter, when nest material is usually dry and not easy to
bend. Wetting of nest material (moss) is also mentioned
by Roberts (1992) for Brown Dippers in Pakistan and by
Tyler and Ormerod ( 1 994) for White-throated Dippers in
Wales. Tyler states that in Europe the White-throated
Dipper mainly uses moss and rarely bits of polythene and
paper. Three of the four nests in sandbanks were found in
Babesa, one in 1999 and two in 2000. The fourth one we
found on 9 March 2000 in Lungtenphu. The latter nest
was in a new tunnel, c. 1 m above the river on a steep slope.
The tunnel was 70 cm deep, with a slight bend upwards.
At the end was a small chamber with three young dippers
on a shelf with some grass. We visited the nest again on 1 9
March, noting that the young ones had grown considerably.
The nest was different from the large, globular structure
recorded for all five dipper species by Ormerod and Tyler
(2005) . Baker (1932) describes the nests of two subspecies
of the Brown Dipper, C. p. tenuirostris and C. p. marila , as
large structures like wren nests, placed in clefts of moss-
and fern-covered rocks. The significance of the aberrant
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
7
nests around Lungtenphu (placed deep in retaining walls
or sandy embankments with, in the latter case, no globular
structure) is not clear. Our lowest record for a Brown
Dipper nest was at the Baso Chhu, Wangdue at 1 , 1 00 m.
Earliest nest-building activities were recorded in mid-
December. Most nest-building was done in January-
February, and building was not seen after early March.
First observations of feeding of young (in the nest) were
in early February, while the last observations are from
mid-April. Spierenburg (2005) describes one case of
freshly fledged young on 16 February. Ormerod and Tyler
(2005) state that Brown Dippers had one brood in Japan
and were ‘not uncommonly double-brooded in other
areas’. We found no evidence that the Brown Dipper was
double-brooded along the Thim Chhu River. Food
becomes scarce for this species when the river is in flood
and this appears to be the main reason that they leave the
area. Y oung dippers and their parents left the area within
two days after leaving the nest. One male was found to
have two females in nest holes less than half a metre away
from each other, under the bridge at Lungtenphu. The
male left the area with the female and young from the first
nest, leaving the second female to take care of the second
brood on her own. While the female of the first nest
managed to rear five juveniles, the female of the second
nest managed only one. Brown Dippers were feeding
their young mostly with aquatic insects, pupae of the
globeskimmer Pantala flavescens, stoneflies (Plecoptera)
and caddisflies (Trichoptera). However, just before and
after leaving the nest, green algae Prasiola are fed to the
young. Other birds recorded feeding on these algae include
Blue Whistling Thrush and White-capped Water Redstart.
These freshwater algae are also eaten by the Bhutanese
people.
Plain-backed Thrush Zoothera mollissima
Resident; occasionally recorded (Spierenburg). On 21
March 1999, we saw five Plain-backed Thrushes in
Hemlock-Rhododendron forest at the Dochula, not far
below the pass on the Wangdue side. On 28 March 1999,
we heard several individuals singing in the same area. On
1 1 June 2000, we found a nest on the ground with three
eggs in the Gidakom forest (Thimphu) on a slope below
some bushes. The incubating adult left the nest only when
approached very closely. The eggs were exactly as Ali
(1962) described them: white, covered with specks, spots
and blotches of blood red and reddish brown This find
adds the Plain-backed Thrush to the list of confirmed
breeders. The forest was of mixed mature Himalayan
spruce Picea spinulosa and oak Quercus semecarpifolia at an
altitude of 2,750 m.
White-collared Blackbird Turdus albocinctus
Abundant resident in the temperate zone and in the high
west. Particularly common in the Thimphu and Paro
valleys, where it finds favoured habitat in abundance
(Spierenburg) . The distribution of this species appears to
have changed over the years . Ludlow and Kinnear (1937)
described it as common in summer between 9,000 and
1 2,000 feet (c. 2,700-3, 700 m) . He found numerous nests
in May and June. For 1990 and 1991, we had only six
records, five at the higher (2,600-3,000 m) areas of the
west and one at the Korila, Mongar. In May 1 993, we saw
our first male in Lungtenphu (2,300 m). After that, the
species rapidly became more abundant in Thimphu valley.
In 1994, a pair probably bred at Lungtenphu. In March
1995, we noticed for the first time daily evening roost
gatherings of small groups of White-collared Blackbirds
in the blue pine forest at Lungtenphu. From 1 995 to 2000,
it was a common breeding bird in Thimphu valley in town
gardens as well as in the blue pine forests surrounding the
valley. No nest was found along the Thim Chhu River in
Lungtenphu, as the nest site was in impenetrable mulberry
and Ligustrum indicum bushes, overgrown with Himalayan
musk rose. This species appears to be double brooded in
Lungtenphu. Around 1 1 June 1998, we saw several recently
fledged juveniles in our garden. On 15 June, the male
started singing again and on 15 August again a recently
fledged juvenile was seen in the same location. Grimmett
et al. ( 1 998) and Collar (2005) give the breeding period as
March to July and do not mention second broods. Our
observations extend the breeding period to August. We
observed that this species mainly ate earthworms; other
items in its diet included kitchen waste, fruits of Cotoneaster
sp., Elaeagnus parvifolia and Siberian crabapple Malus
baccata, old rosehips of Himalayan musk rose, insect larvae
and nectar.
Grey-winged Blackbird Turdus boulboul
Common resident; occupies lower altitudes than the
White-collared Blackbird; two breeding records
(Spierenburg). We found it to be more common towards
the east with a clear preference for the more humid
broadleaf forests. During the breeding season, we found
it at altitudes as high as 2,800 m (Zelela, Wangdue),
3,400 m (Lawala, Phobjika, Wangdue) and 2,500 m
(Gidakom, Thimphu). In Rhangma (2,100 m), we found
it in the same habitat as White-collared Blackbird, both
species having territories near the guesthouse. In April-
May 1995 and 1996, singing males and pairs were regularly
seen in and around Khangma in mixed forest (2, 100 m).
Eurasian Blackbird Turdus merula
Uncommon winter visitor (Spierenburg) . Ali ( 1 9 7 7) called
it ‘resident, subject to vertical movements. Breeds between
3,600 and 4,500 m, descending to 2,000 m in winter’. On
17,18 and 2 1 April 1 996, we saw several blackbirds deep
in the forest near Khangma (2,100 m). During prolonged
observation of one pair, we found that the male was
following the female closely, hopping through the rich
undergrowth of the forest. This behaviour was similar to
the customary behaviour of Eurasian Blackbird males in
Europe, and suggests probable breeding at lower altitudes .
Additional records of blackbirds in or close to the breeding
season are for the Dochula (2,600-3,300 m, 2 in March,
2 in April, 1 in May), Jemina (2,500 m, 1 in May), Kabisa
(2,600 m, 1 in May), Motithang (2,800 m, 1 in July),
Kanglung (2,000 m, 1 in March) and Mongar-Korila
(1,800-2,200 m, 1 each in March and April).
White-browed Shortwing Brachypteryx montana
Common altitudinal migrant; no definite breeding records
for Bhutan, but Ludlow collected a juvenile in Trashi
Yangtse on 3 September (Spierenburg). On 10 October
1999, we saw a family group above Phajoding, in
Rhododendron cinnabarinum scrub on an alpine meadow
at 3,700 m. Although the juveniles were not recently
fledged, they were still fed and dependent on their parents .
Spierenburg (2005) states that the breeding areas are
more commonly above 3,000 m and occupied from mid-
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
April until mid-October. It is unlikely that this family
group migrated into the area, so we consider breeding
confirmed for the species.
Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher Ficedula strophiata
Abundant altitudinal migrant; no confirmed breeding
records; juveniles appear by mid August (Spierenburg).
On 2 1 May 2000 at the Dochula (3,300 m), in hemlock-
rhododendron forest, we heard singing males in two
different spots. In a third spot, we saw an individual
repeatedly flying with food in its bill towards a nest hidden
at ground level in dense undergrowth. This latter
observation confirmed breeding. On that day, the damp
forest was full with large clouds of crane flies (Tipulidae),
suggesting ample food supplies.
Little Pied Flycatcher Ficedula westermanni
Spierenburg recorded it as common near Zhemgang, with
nest building in May. Grimmett et al. ( 1998) write that it
breeds in broadleaf forests. We did not find it common in
western Bhutan and, in summer, we only found it present
in open Blue Pine forest on dry slopes. At Lungtenphu,
a pair was present every year on the hill in Blue Pine forest
near the water channel. On 29 August 1999, a parent
with a recently fledged bird was seen at 2,350 m, which
confirms breeding. Outside the breeding season, we found
this species at lower elevations in broadleaf forests.
Slaty-blue Flycatcher Ficedula tricolor
No confirmed breeding records, but Ludlow collected
juveniles on 1 7 July (Spierenburg). Ludlow and Ivinnear
(1937) collected one juvenile on 17 July 1933 and one
female and a juvenile on 26 August 1933, so these were
collected well before autumn migration (for which we
have 11 records in September-October). The juveniles
collected by Ludlow provide evidence to confirm breeding.
On 12 May 1997, we saw several flycatchers at the forest
edge of the Phobjika Valley at 3,000 m; they showed no
territorial behaviour and presumably were on their way to
breeding areas higher up. On 13 May 1997 in the forest
near the Lawala, Phobjika, 3,400 m, a singing and
displaying male was observed. The singing was recorded
and the male reacted strongly to tape playback. The forest
on the Lawala is dark and wet with Himalayan birch
Betula utilis , Rhododendron barbatum , R. hodgsonii , R. keysii ,
R. camelliiflorum , Viburnum nervosum, Enkianthus deflexus
and clumps of bamboo, all much overgrown with mosses
and lichens.
Sapphire Flycatcher Ficedula sapphira
Uncommon altitudinal migrant (Spierenburg). On 11
April 2000, we saw a female with nest material in a pear
tree at Lungtenphu. She was sitting several metres away;
we observed her well for ten minutes, while she hesitated
to fly to her presumed nest in a large Chinese arbor-vitae
Thuja orientalis. The size of the tree made it impossible to
look for the nest. The location was in a mature garden,
with densely planted old fruit trees and huge conifers like
weeping cypress and many Thuja. Before this, we recorded
only one bird at Cheri, Thimphu (2,600 m) in broadleaf
forest on 15 September 1991. Farrow (2005) noted for
the second half of April 2005 ‘At least three males were
seen along the Lingmethang Road, all high in the tops of
big trees, but calling continually. ’ The Sapphire Flycatcher
should now be considered a probable breeder.
Pale Blue Flycatcher Cyomis unicolor
Common in Zhemgang, probably overlooked earlier to
some degree. Spierenburg (2005) recorded one case of
birds carrying nest material, at 600 m and considered the
Dochula the western limit for this species. We found a
pair (the male with food in his bill) with two recently
fledged birds on 1 7 October 1999 in Rimchhu, Punakha
(1,400 m) in warm broadleaf forest. This confirms
breeding. This species also occurs at Ha, where we saw
a female on 2 May 1999, at 2,600 m in cool broadleaf
forest. A displaying pair was observed in the broadleaf
forest near Khangma (2,200 m) on 21 April 1996.
Orange-flanked Bush Robin Tarsiger cyanunts
Common altitudinal migrant; a large influx sometimes
occurs at lower elevations. No breeding records according
to Spierenburg, although he mentions territorial males
and one juvenile collected by Ludlow on 1 September
(1933). Ludlow’s record was from close to the border
with Tibet (China). We recorded a female building a nest
near the Chelaila (Paro), on 23 April 2000 at 3,800 m in
Rhododendron hodgsonii and fir forest. The female was
calling loudly while collecting nest material. She flew
repeatedly with nest material to a spot on the ground
hidden in vegetation. We retain breeding status as probable.
This species was a regular winter visitor at Lungtenphu.
On 30 March 1998, during heavy snowfall, several came
down to Lungtenphu, together with other high mountain
species. As soon as the weather improved, they departed.
They were, no doubt, breeding higher up the mountain,
which reaches 4,000 m in elevation.
Oriental Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis
Abundant, but absent from western valleys; Spierenburg
states ‘no confirmed breeding records’, although Ludlow
collected a juvenile on 23 June. We found the species to
be common at 1 ,400 m and below, but in eastern Bhutan
it was also found at higher elevations. We recorded it
breeding in buildings in places like Wangdue (1,200 m),
Punakha (1,300 m), Lobeysa (1,300 m), Mongar
(1,800 m), Trashigang (1,200 m), Pemagatshel
( 1 ,800 m), Kanglung (2,000 m) and along the Kuri Chhu
(600 m). It also occurs along the road down to
Phuntsholing, but there are no records for Thimphu. We
have one record of a nest-building pair on 18-20 May
1995 under the open roof of Kelling Lodge at Trashigang
(1,200 m). The female was building with plant material
and feathers, while the male was singing on the roof and
was also seen chasing other males away. On May 20, when
the nest looked quite finished, the male went to the nest
and took out a large piece of maize leaf. This he took with
him onto the roof, where he let it go. Then he started
singing in a different spot on the roof. The female took the
discarded piece of nest material and started building a
new nest, with material from the first attempt, at the spot
where the male was now singing. Local people knew the
species as a regular breeder at Kelling Lodge, and we saw,
at the same place, recently fledged juveniles on several
occasions. We consider its breeding status to now be
confirmed.
Blue-capped Redstart Phoenicurus coeruleocephalus
A rare visitor or resident (Spierenburg). On 12 May 1997,
we found two males and one female in the Gogona valley
at 3,200 m in mature upper montane forest with species
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
9
like hemlock, weeping blue juniper, Himalayan birch, fir,
Sikkim larch Larix griffithiana and dense undergrowth of
Daphne , Viburnum and Rhododendron spp. The males were
fighting, while the female was sitting close by, which
indicates probable breeding. According to distribution
data in Grimmett et al. (1998), the present record
considerably extends the breeding range eastwards, the
normal breeding grounds in Nepal being, for instance, in
the northwest. They give the breeding period as May to
August. Spierenburg (2005) records three recent
observations in Bhutan in the period late March to late
April. We place this redstart among the probable breeders.
Hodgson’s Redstart Phoenicurus hodgsom
Abundant winter visitor (Spierenburg). It breeds from
May to August in the mountains of eastern Tibet and
Sichuan, between 2,900 and 4,200 m (Ali and Ripley
1987a). Our observations now show that there are cases
of this species breeding in its winter range in Bhutan
between February and April, before their return to summer
breeding areas. In October, the Hodgson’s Redstart
returned to Lungtenphu. We observed territorial fighting
from the end of October to February, mostly between
males. For instance, on 1 3 January 2000 we noticed two
males fighting for the possession of a newly dug flowerbed.
This fighting continued daily up to 1 6 February, when we
found one male dead with blood on bill and breast.
Courtship behaviour was seen from the end of
December onwards. Males and females clapped their wings
and held each other’s beaks while making short upward
fluttering flights. Singing and calling was heard during
October and February. In March, few females were seen,
but in April the females were again noted more frequently.
We saw males and females carrying food in March and
April. Our first records of a female with young are from 12
to 22 April 1995. From 30 March to 9 April 1996, we
observed a male and a female bringing food to a nest
hidden on a steep slope near our house. In 2000, a pair
started building a nest in an outbuilding. They flew in
through a gap under the door. However, the gardener,
while repairing the door, disturbed this attempt. These
are the first breeding records for the Indian subcontinent
and Hodgson’s Redstart is now a confirmed breeding bird
for Bhutan. Given the lack of breeding records elsewhere
south of the Himalayas, the cases presented here might be
interpreted as rather exceptional extra-limital breeding.
From May to October, no Hodgson’s Redstarts were
observed in the Thimphu valley. In October and mid-
March, we noted migration of this species along the Thim
Chhu. Numbers of these redstarts would suddenly
increase to 30 or 40 along 2 km of riverbank. These birds
were not territorial, and would leave again after a few
days. About 7-8 winter territories of male Hodgson’s
Redstart were counted along a 2 km stretch of river on
rocky, grass-covered slopes, under mulberry and Ligustrum
indicum bushes. Hodgson’s Redstarts shared their winter
territories with Plumbeous Water Redstart, but few
agonistic interactions were observed. On the other hand,
Hodgson’s Redstart appears to not tolerate winter
territories of Blue-fronted Redstart close to the river, and
individuals of the latter species kept their distance.
Hodgson’s Redstart catches mainly small insects, while
hovering high above the river. It eats a wide range of
insects, especially small Diptera, but also larger insects
like stoneflies and mayflies. It is able to catch insects from
the surface of the river and searches on compost or
firewood stacks for insects and spiders. Fruits of Asparagus
sp., Lonicera quinquelocularis , Siberian crabapple, Berberis
sp. and Ligustrum indicum are also eaten.
White-throated Redstart Phoenicurus schisticeps
Frequent winter visitor; a specimen taken on 1 September
at 3,500 m and a pair seen around 20 October at 4,800 m
perhaps were birds still in their summer range
(Spierenburg). The 1 September 1 933 record from Hamo
Chhu Valley, Eastern Bhutan (Ludlow and Kinnear 1937)
represented, in fact, a juvenile, for which Ludlow and
Kinnear stated ‘Although the bird we secured must have
been bred in the locality whence it was obtained, it is
certainly a rare bird in summer along the Himalayan range,
and the large numbers of this beautiful Redstart which
annually visit the southern slopes of the main range in
winter must, I think, breed well to the north of the
Himalayas.’ On 1 1 November 1999, we saw a group of
about 20 males, females and juveniles in the Gogona
valley (3,200 m), in Rhododendron cinnabarinum shrubs in
pastureland bordering rhododendron-fir forest. Based
on Ludlow’s record and observations, we classify White-
throated Redstart as a confirmed breeder.
Blue-fronted Redstart Phoenicurus frontalis
Abundant altitudinal migrant; no confirmed breeding
records. Ludlow collected juveniles in August
(Spierenburg). In Lungtenphu, we observed that the
species arrived in November and left in April. We mainly
recorded males with territories some distance from the
river. The breeding area was apparently higher up on the
same mountain (4,000 m), because during bad weather
in spring, several, including females, would come down
to the Thim Chhu River. We found a nest with four eggs
and a breeding male on 2 May 1999 at the Chelaila,
(4,000 m) in an area with high rhododendron shrub with
Rhododendron cinnabarinum, R. hodgsonii, R. wallichii and
R. wightii. The nest was built of moss and the inside was
lined with a thick layer of down feathers . The nest was on
the ground at the foot of a rhododendron bush. The male
only left the nest when almost stepped upon. At Phajoding
(3,700 m) on 8 August 1999, on alpine meadow with
clumps of Berberis bushes, we saw a male together with
three juveniles, while on 10 October 1999 in the same
area we saw a pair with two recently fledged young. In
both cases, the parents were busy feeding the young. In
Gogona Valley, Wangdue (3,200 m), many females with
juveniles were seen on 1 1 November 1999. Ludlow and
Kinnear (1937) collected juveniles on 2 and 22 August
1933, but he also recorded for 30 May 1933 (for
Sharithang) ‘a bird building its nest in a hole in a dead
conifer 25 feet (c.7.5 m) from the ground — rather an
unusual site for this Redstart. ’ The breeding status is now
confirmed. Grimmett etal. (1998) gave as breeding period
May to August. Ludlow’s and our records indicate that
the breeding season is prolonged and that this species
could well be double-brooded.
White-capped Water Redstart
Chaimarromis leucocephalus
Abundant; summer range from 1,800 to 3,600 m. One
record of a bird carrying nest material at 3,500 m on
6 May (Spierenburg). We found indications that some
individuals first breed at lower altitude before moving to
10
GOBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
breeding areas at higher altitude. Tyler and Ormerod
(1993) discuss the possibility of a similar strategy in the
Plumbeous Water Redstart. At Lungtenphu, no nests
were found, perhaps because they were well hidden, as
also indicated by Roberts (1992). Territories were large,
with only three in a stretch of c.2 km. We observed these
birds eating insects, green algae, kitchen waste and berries
of Lonicera quinquelocularis. At the Pelela, they were seen
feeding on seeds of Aconogonum sp. White-capped Water
Redstarts arrived in Lungtenphu in the last week of
September. Singing, calling and fighting started in October
and diminished in December. We saw displays from
January to April. Singing resumed in January, and lasted
until the end of March. On 23 January 2000, a pair was
seen along the riverbank, apparently searching for nest
sites. In January, territorial fighting was seen again, and
this sometimes continued up to April. From March to
May, a particular call was heard, which Roberts (1992)
calls a contact call used between partners to keep in touch
during the breeding season. Plumbeous Water Redstarts
use a similar call, by which the male warns the breeding
female of danger, and both male and female similarly
warn their young in the nest. At the end of May, the last
individuals left Lungtenphu. We saw no young birds, and
have few records for this species during the summer at
Lungtenphu. During summer, we saw the species
regularly in the higher mountains near small streams,
where it probably breeds from May to August. Roberts
(1992) records it as double-brooded in Pakistan.
Little Forktail Enicurus scouleri
No confirmed breeding records; the potential breeding
season is unclear; pairs seen in April (Spierenburg). On
13 April 1996, close to the waterfall near Thinleygang
(1,500 m), in warm, broadleaf forest, we observed a
displaying and copulating pair. Webster and Rowlett
(2004) found a pair with a nest beside a waterfall above
the Mo Chhu in April 2004 and saw the adults bring food
to the nest, although they could not see the young. Webster
(2007) described an encounter with a male and female,
both working on a nest under a bank above Namling on
16 April 2007. The pair was seen carrying moss to the
stream, wetting it, and then carrying the soggy material
to the nest. We now upgrade the breeding status from
probable to confirmed.
Siberian Stonechat Saxicola maura
Common winter visitor (Spierenburg). We regularly
saw the subspecies 5. m. indica in Lungtenphu. An
individual male was often seen in the same location for
weeks, sitting on a bush on the banks of the Thim Chhu
River. Most were seen in March and April, indicating
possible breeding. On 5 May 2000, we saw a juvenile at
Lungtenphu in the bushes along the river. It was barely
able to fly and had clearly just left its nest. This confirms
breeding. Other subspecies recorded in Lungtenphu,
sitting in bushes along the riverbanks, were 5. m. maura
and 5. m. przewalskii , but those were passage migrants,
staying only a day or two in the area. 5. m. maura was
observed on passage from December to February, while
5. m. przewalskii was observed on passage from March to
April and again from September to November. For the
English name Siberian Stonechat and the treatment of the
Common Stonechat complex, we follow Urquhart (2002),
who gives the breeding range for S’, m. indica as northern
Baluchistan and North-West Frontier Province in
Pakistan and through the Himalayas from eastern Kashmir
to Nepal, then through Sikkim, Bhutan, Arunachal
Pradesh and Western Assam.
Chestnut-tailed Starling Stumus malabaricus
A frequently recorded altitudinal migrant, but it is unclear
whether it breeds in Bhutan (Spierenburg). On 27 May
1990, we found a nest with three eggs and a breeding
male in Sarpang, inside a house (320 m). The nest was
located on a ridge and some electricity wires 2.5 m above
the ground. The male was very noisy when disturbed.
Breeding is now confirmed. In India, breeding inside
houses (especially ventilation holes) seems to be common
(e.g. Ali and Ripley 1987b, Jaman and Sahreen 2004).
WALLCREEPER Tichodroma muraria
Breeds in the Himalayas mostly above 3,300 m, possibly
down to 2,700 m (Ali and Ripley 1987a). Frequently
recorded winter visitor to Bhutan; no indication of summer
presence (Spierenburg). On 5 May 1995, we noted a
Wallcreeper regularly flying in and out of a hole in the
retaining wall of the old bridge over the Sunkosh River,
at Wangdue Phodrang (1,220 m), taking food inside.
This is the first confirmed case of breeding for Bhutan. In
Lungtenphu, it was a common winter visitor. On 1 0 March
1998, we saw a displaying pair; one bird was singing and
fluttering, while the other was skipping around on a rock,
both showing off their red wing spots. On 20 February
2000, we again saw display at Babesa. Both birds perched
on a sandy wall with their wings showing the red spots.
However, after March we have no more records for this
area. A late spring record was for Trashigang where we
saw several Wallcreepers at the roadside, along the
Drangme Chhu (700 m) on 29 April 1996.
Rusty-flanked Treecreeper Certhia nipalensis
Frequently recorded altitudinal migrant; a juvenile was
collected at 3,000 m on 8 July by Ludlow (Spierenburg) .
On 21 May 2000, we saw a bird alarm-calling with food
in its bill, in hemlock-rhododendron forest on the Dochula
(3,000 m) . This observation upgrades the breeding status
to confirmed. Grimmett et al. (1998) give May-June as
the breeding period.
RUFOUS-VENTED Tit Parus rubidiventris
Common altitudinal migrant; one nest was found with
young on 1 June at 3,650 m and a juvenile was collected
on 1 9 July at 3,200 m by Ludlow (Spierenburg). On 30
May 2000, we found a nest at the Pelela (3,000 m) in a
hole in a fallen tree in Rhododendron kesangiae and fir
forest. The parents were flying in and out of the nest hole,
bringing food to young birds.
Grey-crested Tit Parus dichrous
Abundant altitudinal migrant; no confirmed breeding
records (Spierenburg). On 21 June 1998 and 18 May
2000 on the Dochula (at 3,000 m and 3,300 m
respectively) in Tsuga , Rhododendron arboreum and
R. triflomm forest, we observed a family with several
recently fledged young. This confirms breeding. On 1 1
April 1999 at Motithang (2,500 m) in Pinus wallichiana
and Rhododendron arboreum forest, we observed a male
feeding a begging female. The breeding period is April to
June (Grimmett et al. 1998).
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
1 1
RUFOUS-FRONTED TlT Aegitlialos iouschistos
Common altitudinal migrant; two records of nest building
in April and May (Spierenburg). Ludlow ancf Kinnear
(1937) extracted an egg from the oviduct of a female
collected on 24 May 1933 in Sharithang, Ha (3,350 m).
On 14 May 1997, at Phobjika (3,400 m) in Hemlock
forest with Rhododendron triflorum and R. arboreum
undergrowth, we saw one Rufous-fronted Tit feeding
several young birds. On 9 April 2000, in Hemlock forest
above the Dochula (3,400 m), on the trail to the
Lungchuusi monastery, we saw several individuals flying
around with nest material. Breeding is now confirmed, In
fact, Ludlow’s record already confirmed breeding. The
breeding period is April to July (Grimmett et al. 1998).
Black Bulbul Hypsipetes leucocephalus
Abundant altitudinal migrant. Birds building a nest and
carrying food have been observed (Spierenburg). No
information is available on incubation and nesting periods
(Fishpool and Tobias 2005). The Black Bulbul was a
common breeding bird at Lungtenphu. The first
individuals would arrive single or in a group of up to 20
birds in mid-March. In Lungtenphu, the birds would
initially group together, singing and calling. At night, they
moved to a communal roost in the forest. In the second
half of April, territorial fights took place and the bulbuls
would disperse. Nest building and breeding started at the
end of April. We saw young birds from May to August.
When we could ascertain the number of young ones in
family groups, we counted a single juvenile (once), two
juveniles (on four occasions) and three juveniles (once).
In the lower valleys, we noted young birds as early as April
(e.g. Lobeysa, 1,300 m, 22 April 1991). In the higher
ranges, parents feeding young birds were seen until quite
late (Drukyel Dzong, 2,600 m, on 11 September 1994
and Bumthang, 2,600 m, on 12 September 1999). At
Lungtenphu, the Eurasian Cuckoo regularly targeted nests
of this species.
Black Bulbul was double brooded at Lungtenphu.
Shortly after the first brood had left the nest, the parents
started on a second brood. The first brood remained in
the territory while the second brood was being raised, but
we did not observe them helping to raise their siblings;
instead, they would join their younger siblings in begging.
Nests were mostly well hidden in Ligustrum indicum and
mulberry bushes overgrown with Himalayan musk rose.
However, we found one nest 3 m high in a Siberian
crabapple, and were able to observe this nest from above.
Nest building was completed within two days. The nest
was a small, neat bowl, surprisingly small for the size of the
bird. In the morning of 24 June 1995, the female laid an
egg. The egg was brown with spots. On 26 June, a second
egg was laid and incubation started. Only the female
incubated. On 3 July, a Grey Bushchat landed on the rim
of the nest while it was temporarily unoccupied, but the
returning parent chased it away almost immediately. The
first egg hatched on 7 July and the second the next day. On
8 July, the female still brooded the young birds, while the
male brought small worms and larvae. From 9 July onward,
both parents were observed bringing food. Food of the
Black Bulbul consisted of berries of Elaeagnus parvifolia,
Prinsepia utilis, Ligustrum indicum and mulberry. Insects
were caught on flowering trees. Nestlings were fed with
small insects, while later on big caterpillars were given. In
Bumthang (2,600 m), we saw a pair feeding their young
with honeybees, which were caught with great ease. The
last Bulbuls left Lungtenphu by early October. In
Wangdue, feeding on nectar from Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
was observed in winter.
Oriental White-eye Zoster ops palpebrosus
Abundant resident; only one nest with young was found,
on 19 July at 1,900 m (Spierenburg). We found a pair
feeding recently fledged birds on 9 August 1998 at the
Dochula (3,000 m), in the garden of the teahouse, close
to cool broadleaf forest mixed with Hemlock. Grimmett
et al. (1998) give the breeding period to be February-
September and say that 2,400-2,700 m is the upper
altitude in the breeding season.
COMMON Tailorbird Orthotomus sutorius
Common resident; no indication of breeding
(Spierenburg) . According to Grimmett et al. ( 1 998), the
Common Tailorbird breeds throughout the year (mainly
in the monsoon), while Ali and Ripley (1987a) say that
the breeding season is March-December. On 3-4
November 1994, we saw a group with juveniles in
Trashigang, in the garden of Kelling lodge (1,200 m).
The birds were confiding (which is common for this
species) and could be observed for long periods. The
juveniles had recently fledged and had very short tails.
This observation confirms the breeding status. Although
this species typically occurs in pairs, we more often saw
small groups of Common Tailorbirds in Trashigang and
in Mongar (1,400 m) in other months. Webster and
Rowlett (2004) saw a pair displaying near Tingtibi
(Zhemgang) in April 2004.
Striated Laughingthrush Garrulax striatus
Abundant and widespread; no breeding records
(Spierenburg) . On 1 9 September 1994, we observed from
close by a pair with three recently fledged juveniles at
Khaling, Trashigang (2,300 m), in shrub vegetation on
marshy, natural pastureland, surrounded with broadleaf
forests. The juveniles were begging while following their
parents. This confirms breeding in Bhutan. Collar and
Robson (2007) give as breeding period April to August
and the clutch size as 2-3 eggs.
RUFOUS-VENTED Yuhina Yuhina occipitalis
Found in pairs in the breeding areas; family groups
aggregate in December in larger flocks; no confirmed
breeding records (Spierenburg). Grimmett et al. (1998)
give April-June as the breeding period. On 2 1 June 1998,
we saw several families with parents feeding recently
fledged juveniles near the Dochula (3,100 m) along a
forest trail to Lungchuusi in mixed conifer and
rhododendron forest. This observation upgrades the status
of this species from probable to confirmed breeder.
Oriental Skylark Alauda gulgula
Common both as breeder and winter visitor; presence of
singing birds establishes it as a probable breeder in Bhutan
(Spierenburg). On 15 May 1995, at the abandoned
Yongphula airstrip (Trashigang 2,700 m), we found a
nest on grassland with rocks and some Rhododendron
maddenii bushes. The parent stayed on the three dark-
brown and spotted eggs until we were very close. The
nest was made of grass, partially covered with a neat roof
of woven grass and protected by an overhanging rock.
12
GOBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
This species was very common on the grassland
surrounding the airstrip. On 18 May 1996 in Phobjika
(2,800 m) we noticed many breeding individuals in the
valley. We failed to find a nest, but saw parents collecting
insect larvae for their young. One lark that we observed
was able to find numerous larvae within five minutes.
The species preferred the low-cropped pastureland in the
lower part of the valley. Spierenburg (2005) says that the
open Phobjika and Bumthang valleys are well-known sites
for singing birds in spring and summer. Breeding is now
confirmed for Bhutan.
White-browed Wagtail Motacilla maderaspatensis
Uncommon resident; a singing bird at Phuntsholing is
the only evidence of breeding in Bhutan (Spierenburg).
Grimmett et al. (1998) give as breeding period March to
October. At Babesa, we saw several juvenile birds on 1
August 1 996. On 3 1 May 1 997, on the stony bank of the
Thim Chhu River at Babesa, we observed a pair behaving
as if they had a nest. They tried to distract us while we
carried out a fruitless search for the nest. At some distance,
a pair of White Wagtails was simultaneously feeding their
fully grown young. On 13 April 2000, at the rocky banks
of the Torsa River near Phuntsholing (300 m), a pair of
White-browed Wagtails and three juveniles were seen,
well on the Bhutanese side of this broad river. Farrow
(2005) observed a female feeding two fully grown juveniles
on the riverbank at Punakha in the second week of April
2005. White-browed Wagtail is now categorised as a
confirmed breeder.
Olive-backed Pipit Anthus hodgsoni
Ludlow reported numerous nests at 2,400-3,600 m.
Singing birds have been noted at 2,000-4,100 m
(Spierenburg). On 19 May 1996, we found it to be a
common breeding bird in Phobjika valley (2,800 m). We
easily found one nest in natural grassland, a bit sheltered
between rocks. It contained two young birds of about ten
days old. A parent brought insects and spiders to feed the
young. A dead nestling lay outside the nest.
SCALY-BREASTED MUNIA Lonchura punctulata
Occasionally reported; no confirmed breeding records
(Spierenburg) . We found it common in Kanglung (2,000
m), with nests in creepers on the veranda of a bungalow
on 1 0 October 1 993. Nests were large structures of joined
old and new nests; around ten nests were occupied. It was
also common in Trashigang, breeding in trees and creepers
in the Dzong grounds on 18 September 1994. Grimmett
et al. (1998) say that it breeds throughout the year, mainly
May-September. Breeding is now confirmed for Bhutan.
Yellow-breasted Greenfinch Carduelis spinoides
Common, but no breeding records (Spierenburg). In
Lungtenphu, we saw a pair with three juveniles on 5
September 1991, while on 2 July 1993, a nest with a
breeding parent was found in a Chinese arbor-vitae in a
garden. At the end of summer, small groups including
juveniles were regularly seen collecting seeds from
sunflowers and other plants. Breeding is now confirmed.
Grimmett et al. (1998) give June-October as the breeding
period.
Dark-breasted Rosefinch Carpodacus nipalemis
Frequently recorded altitudinal migrant (Spierenburg).
We recorded a pair behaving as if they had a nest with
young or fledglings at an alpine meadow above Phajoding
(3,800 m) in Rhododendron cinnabarinum bushes on 8
August 1999. The parents were nervously flying around
and had food in their beaks. This indicates probable
breeding. Grimmett et al (1998) do not give a breeding
period but birds in breeding condition were collected in
June-July. Ali and Ripley (1987a) say that the breeding
period is ‘apparently July-August.’
White-browed Rosefinch Carpodacus thura
Common altitudinal migrant; in April-September it
occurs in its breeding quarters at 3,000-4,200 m
(Spierenburg). Grimmett et al. (1998) say that the
breeding period is July-August. We found the species
common from May to October on the alpine meadows
near the Chelaila (4,000 m) and above Phajoding (3,800
m) . From our observation of the behaviour of these birds,
it was clear that groups in August included juveniles.
Juveniles are difficult to distinguish from females or even
males. Ludlow and Kinnear (1937) comment that ‘males
are constantly found in female plumage.’ We therefore
studied the groups more closely and found that on 8
August 1999, in a group of 20 individuals on an alpine
meadow above Phajoding, parents were constantly feeding
their young. This food included seeds of species of
Compositae. We now upgrade the breeding status from
probable to confirmed.
Collared Grosbeak Mycewbas affinis
Records are few; breeding evidence is lacking
(Spierenburg) . Nest and eggs are unknown (Ali and Ripley
1987a). We only have 11 records, agreeing well with the
data on distribution given by Ali and Ripley (1987a). Our
highest record was for three birds seen on 7 November
1 999 above Phajoding, along the trail to Pomela at 3,700
m, in juniper bushes. The lowest was at Trongsa, on 19
September 1 999 at 1 ,800 m in broadleaf forest. A female
observed in bushes along the river at Lungtenphu on 3
March 2000 might have been a passage migrant. We saw
our first indication of breeding behaviour on 21 March
1999 in the Dochula area, at 2,800 m in rhododendron
forest (R. keysii, R. arboreum, R. barbatum ) with Pieris
formosa, Daphne bholua, Viburnum grandiflorum and
Dodecadenia grandiflora. A displaying pair was observed,
following each other through the undergrowth of the
forest, apparently unconcerned or unaware of our
presence. On 23 April 2000 at the Chelaila, in fir and
Rhododendron hodgsonii forest at 3,900 m, several Collared
Grosbeaks were seen displaying in the trees, while also
calling loudly. These observations provide strong evidence
for this species being a probable breeder in Bhutan.
A general observation concerns single-species parties
occurring in spring before breeding starts. For Brown
Dipper, such groups could number up to 17 birds during
December-January . At these gatherings, they were singing
and displaying. Later the dippers dispersed and started
breeding. Black Bulbuls would arrive in Lungtenphu in
a group of up to 20 birds in mid March. In Lungtenphu,
the bulbuls would initially act together as a group, often
singing loudly. At the end of March, territorial fights
started and the breeding season would begin. The Eurasian
Jay also formed single species parties before starting to
breed. Grey-crested Tit was seen forming mixed bird
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
13
parties at other times of the year, but on 5 March 2000,
two single species parties of 20 and 50 birds were seen at
the Dochula. The tits were noisily displaying. Single
species parties were also discussed by Inskipp and Inskipp
(2000) and Spierenburg (2005).
FURTHER ADDITIONS TO THE
BREEDING LIST
In recent years, a number of additions or status changes
have been recorded in the published literature or in tour
reports. Also four previously overlooked records from
Ludlow and Kinnear (1937) that confirm breeding are
presented, as is another record from All et al. (1996).
Based on these records, the following additions and status
upgrades can be made.
BLYTH’S Tragopan Tragopan blythii
Rare resident (Spierenburg). Ali etal. (1996) note a female
collected on 30 March 1966 on the Yonpu La (2,621 m).
Biswas ( 1 968) described the collecting place as above the
Bulfai Pass (elevation c. 2,621 m, c.77°14'N 91°3LE,
Manas Valley, eastern Bhutan). Ali et al. noted that ‘the
bird was about to lay. Its ovary was well developed, and
it had incubation patches.’ From a somewhat ill-defined
status as probable breeder, this rare tragopan should now
be regarded as a confirmed breeder.
SPECKLED Piculet Picumnus innominatus
Pairs are found from late March to June and breeding
territories have been observed. Copulation has been
observed in late March and early April but there is no
further evidence of breeding (Spierenburg). Webster and
Rowlett (2005) state ‘we found one, which we watched
go to its nest hole near Zhemgang’ in April 2005. The
breeding status remains at probable.
Grey-capped Pygmy Woodpecker
Dendrocopos canicapillus
Common resident at 200-1,200 m; no indications of
breeding other than observations of pairs in the breeding
season (Spierenburg). Farrow (2006, 2007) recorded a
pair that had a nest hole in Tingtibi in April 2006, while
on 28 April 2007 in Samdrup Dzongkhar, a pair was
observed feeding a young one. Grimmett et al. (1998)
give the breeding period to be April-July, so the Bhutan
records are somewhat early. The status is now upgraded
from probable to confirmed breeding.
LESSER CUCKOO Cuculus poliocephalus
Occasional summer visitor, calling May to late July
(Spierenburg). Ludlow and Kinnear (1937) collected a
juvenile on 15 August 1933 in Sawang, Lhuntse (2,130
m). He stated ‘This single specimen, just out of the nest,
is in the dark phase’ and so the Lesser Cuckoo qualifies
as a confirmed breeder.
Mountain Scops Owl Otus spilocephalus
Common, calling from February until September
(Spierenburg), with breeding period March-June
(Grimmett et al. 1998). Ludlow and Kinnear (1937)
collected one female and two juveniles on 1 August 1933
inTrashi Yangtse (2,300 m) in thick deciduous forest. The
juvenile records confirm breeding for this species in Bhutan.
Tawny Fish Owl Ketupa flavipes
Uncommon resident; pairs noted in April-May
(Spierenburg). Grimmett et al. (1998) give a breeding
period ofDecember-February in Assam. Holt etal. (1999)
give November-February as the egg-laying period. Farrow
(2006, 2007) recorded one adult with two juveniles on
7 April 2006 in forest along the Mo Chhu in Punakha at
a roost high up a slope, and also saw a pair with one
juvenile around 1 3 April 2007 in the same area. The status
is hence upgraded from possible to confirmed breeder.
Lesser Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus remifer
Common resident; singing birds noted from March to
early June; breeding pairs noted but no confirmed breeding
records (Spierenburg). Webster (2006) confirmed
breeding for the country by spotting a bird on a nest
below Yongkhola on 18 April 2006.
Gould’s Shortwing Brachypteryx stellata
Uncommon altitudinal migrant, mainly known from
specimens collected by Ludlow. Those collected in
September were probably still on the breeding grounds as
suggested by the presence of juveniles (Spierenburg). In
fact, Ludlow and Kinnear (1937) collected one juvenile
on 14 August 1933 (Pang La, 4,250 m) and another at
Shingbe (3,900 m) on 25 August 1 933. He described the
latter specimen as ‘a juvenile which had just left the nest.’
The breeding period is reported to be end-May to July by
Grimmett et al. (1998). Ludlow and Kinnear said that
eggs are probably laid in June-July. This bird is now
categorised as a confirmed breeder.
White-bellied Redstart Hodgsonius phaenicumides
Uncommon altitudinal migrant. In May-June it has
been noted at 3,200-4,200 m (Spierenburg) . Grimmett et
al. (1998) give May-August as the breeding period. In Ha
(3,350 m), on 13 June 1933, Ludlow and Kinnear (1937)
recorded a female ‘shot off a nest containing three eggs
which was placed near the ground amidst long grass at the
base of a small tree.’ A male was shot four days later. The
breeding status should now be considered as confirmed.
Yellow-bellied Warbler Abroscopus superciliaris
Altitudinal migrant; singing birds occupying territories
from April-August form the only indication of breeding
(Spierenburg). Grimmett et al. (1998) say that the
breeding period is April-June and indicate that nests are
placed in a hollow in a bamboo stem. Webster and Rowlett
(2005) recorded ‘Good views of a pair, one of which was
working, piculet-like, on an apparent nest hole in a bamboo
stalk above Tingtibi’ in April 2005. The breeding status
is now upgraded from possible to probable.
Black-faced Laughingthrush Garrulax affinis
Abundant; in summer it occurs at 2,200-4,200 m
(Spierenburg). Grimmett et al. (1998) say that breeding
occurs in April-June. Prevett and McManiman (2005)
saw a pair collecting nest material on the Yotongla
(3,275 m) on 17 April 2005. This species has now been
added as a probable breeder.
White-browed Scimitar Babbler
Pomatorhinus schisticeps
Local, but frequently recorded (Spierenburg). Breeding
March-August (Grimmett etal. 1998). While going north
14
GOBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
along the Zhemgang road (1,650 m) in April 2005, Farrow
(2005) saw a White-browed Scimitar Babbler carrying
nest material. This species is added to the list as a probable
breeder.
GREAT Parrotbill Conostoma oemodium
Uncommon resident (Spierenburg), breeding from May
to July (Grimmett et al. 1998). Farrow (2006) recorded
four birds on the Yotongla in April 2006, including a bird
carrying nest material to a dense patch of bamboo. The
Great Parrotbill is added as a probable breeder.
DISCUSSION
Spierenburg’s (2005) book is an invaluable contribution
to the checklist of Bhutan birds; apart from adding our
own field observations, we have only considered it
necessary to reassess records by Ludlow and Kinnear
(1937), as some of Ludlow’s observations had been
overlooked or had not led to the correct breeding
classification. On their own, Ludlow’s records confirmed
breeding for four additional species: Lesser Cuckoo
(juvenile just out of the nest), Mountain Scops Owl (female
and 2 juveniles collected on 1 August), Gould’s Shortwing
(juvenile which had just left the nest) and White-bellied
Redstart (female shot off a nest containing three eggs).
For another seven species, Ludlow’s records provide
additional or primary evidence for status as confirmed
breeder: Eurasian Jay (juvenile on 1 July), White-browed
Shortwing (juvenile on 3 September, where previous
migration can be excluded), Slaty-blue Flycatcher
(juveniles collected well before the autumn migration),
White-throated Redstart (‘must have been bred in the
locality whence it was obtained’), Blue-fronted Redstart
(records of juveniles and of ‘a bird building its nest in a
hole’). Rusty-flanked Tree-creeper (juvenile collected on
8 July) and Rufous-fronted Tit (egg extracted from the
oviduct of a female collected on 24 May). One more
addition to the list of confirmed breeders that comes from
the older literature is that of Blyth’s T ragopan by Ali et al.
(1996) who collected a female and noted ‘the bird was
about to lay. Its ovary was well developed, and it had
incubation patches.’
Taken together, the data presented here lead to an
increase in the total number of breeding birds of Bhutan
from 360 (Spierenburg 2005) to 380 for the three
categories distinguished (possible, probable and
confirmed breeders) . The number of confirmed breeders
increased from 140 to 184, while those for possible and
probable breeders now stand at 40 and 1 56, respectively.
Just over half of the 380 breeding birds remain to be
confirmed. In addition, there is a large group of potentially
breeding birds known to occur in the ‘breeding season’ in
Bhutan (see Spierenburg 2005). However, because no
information is available on whether these species occur in
‘possible nesting habitat’ and no singing or calling has
been recorded, they do not yet qualify to be classified as
possible breeders. Clearly, the number of breeding species
in Bhutan is likely to be substantially higher than 380.
Equally clearly, there are still considerable gaps in our
knowledge of breeding birds in Bhutan. This is partly
explained by the relatively low number of professional
and amateur birdwatchers involved in data collecting.
The reliance on information by non-resident birdwatchers
is likely to have led to biases in time and space as suggested
by Spierenburg (2005) . An increase in observations during
the monsoon period, in the high altitude areas and in
districts like Samtse, Sarpang, Pemagatshel and Samdrup
Dzongkhar will, no doubt, lead to considerable further
increases in the checklist of breeding birds. We hope that
Bhutanese birdwatchers will take the lead in this.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the Royal Government of Bhutan for the opportunity
to live and work in Bhutan from 1 990 to 2000. Carol and Tim Inskipp
went through an earlier draft and provided useful comments. We express
our sincere thanks to an anonymous reviewer for suggesting a large
number of improvements on the drafts. The following bird tour
companies (and authors) made their tour reports available on-line:
Birdquest Ltd CD. Farrow), Kingbird Tours (J. Holmes), Surfbirds (C.
McFadden), Birdtours Ltd. (P. Prevett, P. and C. McManiman) and
Field Guides Inc. (R. Webster and R. A. Rowlett).
REFERENCES
Ali, R. ( 1 967) The Brown Dipper ( Cinclus pallasii ) as a host of a Cuckoo
( Cuculus sp .). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 64: 561.
Ali, S. (1962) The birds of Sikkim . New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. (1977) Field guide to the birds of the Eastern Himalayas. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987a) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan. 2nd edn. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987b) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan, together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri
Lanka. Volume 5. Larks to the Grey Hypocolius. 2nd edn. New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
Ali, S., Biswas, B. and Ripley, S. D. (1996) The birds of Bhutan. Rec.
Zool. Survey India, Occ. Pap. 136.
Baker, E. C. S. (1927) The fauna of British India including Ceylon and
Burma. Vol 4, 2nd edn. London: Taylor & Francis.
Baker, E. C. S. (1932) The nidification of the birds of the Indian Empire.
Vol. 1 . London: Taylor & Francis.
Biswas, B. (1968) The female of Molesworth’s tragopan, Tragopan
blythi molesworthi Baker. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 65: 216-217.
Cleere, N. (1999) Family Caprimulgidae. Pp. 302-387 inj. del Hoyo,
A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol.
5. Barn-owls to Hummingbirds. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Collar, N. J. (2005) Family Turdidae (Thrushes). Pp. 514-81 1 in J. del
Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world,
Vol. 10. Cuckoo-shrikes to Thrushes. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Collar, N. J. and Robson, C. (2007) Family Timaliidae (Babblers). Pp.
70-291 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook
of the birds of the world, Vol. 12. Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Earth T rends (2006) Biodiversity and protected areas — Country profile :
Bhutan. Available at http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/biodiversity-
protected/country-profile-22.html. Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Farrow, D. (2005) . Bhutan 1 3 April - 2 May 2005 tour report. Available
at http://www. shortwing. co. uk/pages/tripDetails.asp?id= 60.
Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Farrow, D. (2006) . Bhutan 4 April - 23 April 2006 tour report. Available
at http ://www. shortwing. co.uk/pages/tripDe tails. asp?id= 68.
Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Farrow, D. (2007). Bhutan 10-29 April 2007 tour report. Available
at http://www.birdquest.co.uk/pdfs/report/BHUTAN%2007.pdf.
Accessed on 17 June 2008.
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
15
Fishpool, L. D. C. and Tobias, J. A. (2005) Family Pycnonotidae. Pp.
124-250 in J. del Floyo, A. Elliott and D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook
of the birds of the world. Vol. 10. Cuckoo-shrikes to Thrushes.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N., Bauer, K. M. and Bezzel, E., eds. (1971)
Handbuchder Vogel Mitteleuropas . Band 4. Wiesbaden: Falconiformes
Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft .
Grewal B., Flarvey B. and Pfister O. (2002) A photographic guide to the
birds of India, including Nepal, Sri Lanka, The Maldives, Pakistan,
Bangladesh and Bhutan. London: Christopher Helm.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm, London.
Groombridge B. and Jenkins M., eds (1995) Biodiversity data sourcebook.
Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Press.
Hagemeijer, E. J. M. and Blair M. J., eds (1997) The EBCC atlas of
European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance. London: T.
& A.D. Poyser.
Holmes, J. ( 1 996). Bhutan, May 1 996. Unpublished tour report. Available
at http://www.kingbirdtours.com/reports/bhutanre.html. Accessed
on 16 June 2008.
Holt, D. W., Berkley, R., Deppe, C., Enriquez Rocha, P. L., Petersen,
J. L., Rangel Salazar, J. L., Segars, K. P. and Wood, K. L. (1999)
Ta wny Fish-owl. Pp. 193-1 94 in J. delHoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal,
eds. Handbook of birds of the world, Vo\. 5: Barn-owls to Hummingbirds.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2000) Single species bird flocks. Druk Bja
Yigsel 2: 1-3.
Jaman, M. F. and Sahreen, N. (2004) Ecology and breeding biology of
Chestnut-headed Starling, Stumus malabaricus (Gmelin, 1789).
Ecoprint 1 1: 27-34.
Knystautas, A. J. (1996) Family Ibidorhynchidae (Ibisbill). Pp. 326-331
in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 3. Hoatzin to Auks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Ludlow, F. andKinnear, N. B. (1937) The Birds of Bhutan and adjacent
territories of Sikkim and Tibet. Ibis (14) 1 : 1-46, 249-293, 467-504.
McFadden, C. (2005) Bhutan, 29 March-15 April 2005. Unpublished
tour report. Available at http://www.surfbirds.com/
trip_report.php?id=684. Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Naoroji, R. (2006) Birds of prey of the Indian subcontinent. London:
Christopher Helm.
Ormerod, S. J. and Tyler, S. J. (2005) Family Cinclidae. Pp. 332-355
in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 10. Cuckoo-shrikes to Thrushes. Barcelona: Lynx
Edicions.
Prevett, P. and McManiman, C (2005) A birding trip to Bhutan, April
7-26, 2005. Unpublished tour report. Available at http://
www.birdtours.co.uk/tripreports/bhutan/bhutan2/Bhutan-
Narrative-2005.htm. Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Roberts, T. J. (1991) The birds of Pakistan. Vol. 1 : Non-Passeriformes.
Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, T. J. (1992) The birds of Pakistan. Vol. 2: Passeriformes. Karachi:
Oxford University Press.
Sherub (2000) Report of avifauna survey of Bumdeling Wildlife
Sanctuary May-June and September 2000. Unpublished report.
Spierenburg, P. (2005) Birds in Bhutan, status and distribution. Bedford,
UK: Oriental Bird Club.
Thiollay, J. M. (1994) Family Accipitridae. Pp. 52-205 in J. del Hoyo,
A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol.
2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Tyler, S. J. and Ormerod, S. J. (1993) The ecology of river birds in
Nepal. Forktail 9: 59-82.
Tyler, S. J. and Ormerod, S. J. (1994) The Dippers. London: T & A.D.
Poyser.
Urquhart, E. (2002) Stonechats, a guide to the genus Saxicola. London:
Christopher Helm.
Webster, R. (2006) Bhutan April 7, 2006 to April 27, 2006. Unpublished
trip report. Available athttp://www. fieldguides.com/2006weblists/
bhu06LlST.pdf. Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Webster, R. (2007) Bhutan April 6, 2007 to April 26, 2007. Unpublished
trip report. Available athttp://www. fieldguides.com/2007weblists/
bhu07LIST.pdf. Accessed on 16 June 2008.
Webster, R. and Rowlett, R. A. (2004) Bhutan April 2, 2004 to April
22, 2004. Unpublished trip report. Available at http://
www.fieldguides.com/2004weblists/bhu04LIST.pdf. Accessed on
1 6 June 2008.
Webster, R. and Rowlett, R. A. (2005) Bhutan April 1, 2005 to April
21, 2005. Unpublished trip report. Available at http://
www.fieldguides.com/2005weblists/bhu05LIST.pdf. Accessed on
16 June 2008.
Woodall, P. F. (2001) Family Alcedinidae. Pp. 130-249 in J. del
Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the
world. Vol. 6. Mousebirds to Hornbills. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Cobi Feijen and Hans R. Feijen, Piet Heinlaan 5, 2341 SG Oegstgeest, The Netherlands. Email: cobifeijen@planet.nl,
hansfeijen 1 9@yahoo. co. uk
APPENDIX 1
List of birds breeding in Bhutan with current and previous (Spierenburg 2005) status. To assign breeding status we
adapted the criteria ofHagemeijer and Blair (1997) and Spierenburg (2005) (seeTable 1 fornumeric codes). Occasionally,
observations published did not fully fit a particular criterion; the number is then placed between brackets.
16
GOBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
17
18
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
19
20
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
21
GOBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A review of the breeding birds of Bhutan
23
24
COBI FEIJEN and HANS R. FEIJEN
Forktail 24 (2008)
APPENDIX 2
Gazetteer of major locations mentioned in the text
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 25-47
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding
avifauna: correcting a ‘founder effect’ in perceptions
J.W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
O. L. Austin published The birds of Korea, the first comprehensive review of the Korean peninsula’s avifauna, in 1948. Its findings have been
accepted almost uncritically by subsequent workers, yet four major factors led Austin to underestimate the species richness of the Korean
breeding avifauna by at least 30-50%: the country was still under-explored during the breeding season; Austin did not use several key written
and specimen sources; he often rejected others’ statements of Korean breeding; and he took the attitude with most species that if it lacked
evidence (acceptable to him) of breeding in Korea, it must be considered a non-breeding visitor. Data from around Austin’s review period
show that 43 species he considered not to breed (ofwhich for 27 he directly disparaged others’ statements ofbreeding) were summer residents,
and most were proven breeders; many others have been found since. A more balanced treatment would have understood that absence of
evidence is not evidence of absence, left the status of these (and many other) species open, and called for further data. The result is that
subsequent confirmation of breeding has led to the false impression that such species have colonised Korea since Austin’s time. His restricted
fieldwork and poor collation of existing sources limited his authority to make assertive rejections. Austin was disproportionately disdainful
of Japanese and Korean sources. Aside from his attitude-driven diminution of the perceived Korean breeding avifauna, Austin made multiple
other classes of error. Future commentators on the status of Korean birds should review surviving written and specimen data independently,
rather than trust in Austin’s review and the subsequent works perpetuating his cultural biases.
INTRODUCTION
‘I have considered as summer residents those species which
occur regularly in the territory in June, July and August,
whether or not there is evidence of nesting. In most cases
the summer resident doubtless breeds in the area, but
mere presence during the nesting season is not proof of
breeding, and many forms have been assumed to do so by
previous authors which future investigation may prove
do not. Hence, while the use of this category implies that
a bird breeds in Korea, I have tried in each case to indicate
what, if any, nesting proof is available. In many instances
it is appallingly meagre.’
So wrote Austin (1948: 5-6) in his seminal review of the
avifauna of Korea. Such caution in a status baseline is
admirable, and the review’s conclusions have been
accepted almost uncritically by subsequent authors,
including major reviews for southern (Gore and Won
Pyong-Oh 1971, Park Jin-Young 2002) and northern
(Tomek 1999, 2002) provinces of Korea.
As Austin (1948: 6-27) remarked in his ‘Historical
Sketch’, most of Korea remained ‘ terra incognita to
occidental naturalists’ until the 1880s, and even the next
couple of decades hosted few surveys. The formal Japanese
annexation of Korea in 1910 brought Japanese
ornithologists to the country. Won Hong Koo, almost
alone among Koreans, started collecting in 1920. He wrote
successive Korean checklists, and remained active until
his death (on 3 October 1970; Gore and Won Pyong-Oh
1971). Few westerners were ornithologically active in
Korea during 1910-1945, e.g. D. J. Cumming (1933)
and S. Bergman (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). In all,
as Austin himself wrote, his avifauna was constructed
from fragmentary material, especially as (see below) he
had no direct access to Won Hong Koo or his collection,
only to his checklists written in 1932 and 1934.
A surprising number of species purportedly colonised
Korea after 1950, as portrayed in Gore and Won Pyong-
Oh (1971), Tomek (1999, 2002) and/or Park Jin-Young
(2002). These authors drew their conclusions using
Austin’s baseline. Our reference to Austin’s own pre-
Figure 1. Korea, showing province names and localities mentioned in
the text: 1 : Shinten, 2: Manpo, 3: Musan, 4: Nongsadong, 5: Paekdu-
san, 6: Chuul-gang, 7 : Engan, 8: Nan-Do, 9: Gekatsuri, 10: Hvangsan,
11: Myohyang mountains, 12: Ryongampho, 13: Anju, 14: Wonsan,
15: Pyongyang, 16: Kimhwa, 17: Paengnyong island, 18: Kwangnung
national arboretum, 19: Imjin-gang, 20: Seoul, 21: Wasong Reservior,
22: Inchon, 23: Suwon, 24: Seosan City, 25: Chiri-san, 26: Pusan, 27:
Suncheon, 28: Chilbal Island, 29: Taehuksan, 30: Taegukul Island.
26
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
1948 sources soon revealed records contrary to Austin’s
conclusions and a tendency for him to make weakly
supported, yet assertive, statements of seasonal absence.
Hence, here we re-evaluate the pre-1948 Korean
breeding avifauna, using the same geographical scope as
Austin, i.e. the entire peninsula and adjacent islands,
excluding the more distant Cheju (formerly Quelpart)
and Ullung (formerly Dagelet) islands. The focus is on
breeding-season assessments because it was with these,
rather than passage and winter status, that Austin most
frequently disputed previous assertions. Moreover,
breeding status is of fundamental conservation concern.
Changes in breeding range are often more readily detected
than in population size, and so constitute among the best
indicators of species conservation status. Unjustifiably
strong statements of historical breeding absence compared
with current presence invite erroneous conclusions over
range extensions, thereby warping understanding and,
potentially, conservation priorities. Furthermore, interest
has intensified in assessing range changes in relation to
global climatic trends (Crick 2004).
Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Inskipp et al.
(1996). Site names in Korea follow Tomek (1999, 2002)
for northern provinces, and Park Y oung-Han et al. (2000)
for southern provinces. Figure 1 shows the location of all
Korean provinces and those sites referred to in the text.
Citations within direct quotations of Austin have been
omitted. Unqualified references to ‘Won’ refer to Won
Hong Koo, not to his son Won Pyong-Oh, whose work
post-dated Austin. Scientific names are given in the text
only for species not in Appendix 1 . The following non¬
standard abbreviations are used: AMNH, American
Museum of Natural History, New York, U.S.A.; FMNH,
Field Museum, Chicago, U.S.A.; MVZ, Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley, California, U.S. A.; NHM,
the Natural History Museum, Britain (formerly BMNH);
NRM, Swedish Museum of Natural History
(Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet), Stockholm, Sweden; ZISP,
Zoological Institute of St Petersburg, Russia.
SOURCES REVIEWED
Several key early collections of Korean birds were
destroyed by earthquakes and the effects of war (Austin
1948), so the present re-assessment relies heavily on
written material covering Austin’s period (up to 1948) or
directly afterwards. To compare his status assessments
with more recent information is less instructive because
of the possibility of genuine status changes over time.
Three contemporary sources not covered by Austin
permit direct triangulation of his conclusions. Aleksander
Yankovskii (in Tomek 1999, 2002) documented birds
extensively through Korea’s northern provinces in
summer 1897; Austin made no mention of his trip.
Secondly, Sten Bergman collected assiduously in north
and central Korea from early 1935 to mid 1936. Austin
knew he had collected bird skins, but did not obtain any
details; nor did he read two notes (Bergman 1935a, 1935b)
that contain more factual bird information than does the
travelogue he didread (Bergman 1938). Duckworth and
Frisk (in prep.) review Bergman’s skins and unpublished
written notes. Thirdly, Austin’s friend L. R. Wolfe (1950)
observed birds during February 1947-December 1948.
Although citing Wolfe (1950), Gore and Won Pyong-Oh
(1971) included his breeding results only patchily, and
subsequent authors often miss his findings. Some of
Wolfe’s (1950) information refutes Austin’s assertions,
yet Wolfe did not flag this; indeed, he stated that ‘the
presently known ornithology of Korea has been admirably
summed up in Dr Austin’s recent publication’.
Three sources from soon after Austin’s review period
allow more cautious inference of bird status in the period.
None covers all Korea, reflecting political partition in
1953. Won Hong Koo collected c. 5,000 bird skins from
many sites across northern Korea during the 1950s and
1960s, leading to The birds of Korea (Won Hong Koo
1963-1965); Tomek (1999, 2002) presented, from book
and collection, dates and locations for every specimen
and observation. Some individual data are questionable
(T ornek 1 999), but species-level conclusions are evidently
sound because few are contrary to other relevant
information. In southern Korea, Gore and Won Pyong-
Oh (1971) presented status conclusions but not all
individual records (so inferences and assumptions cannot
all be distinguished from facts), apparently covering
1950s-1960s collections (including, presumably, the
c. 4,000 skins collected by C. M. Fennell during 1947-
1966 and stored at MVZ) . Of Austin ( 1 948), they stated
that ‘much new information has come to light which
changes the status of many species’ but they did not review
pre-1948 primary sources thoroughly. Park Jin-Young
(2002) expanded available detail on 1950s-1960s status
through reviewing specimens in collections in Korea’s
southern provinces, material in databased overseas
collections (Park Jin-Young verbally 2006), and published
sources (of which few pre-dated Austin).
Mauersberger (1981: 15) is apparently the only author
so far to express explicit concern at Austin’s reliability.
He sought, unsuccessfully, Austin’s working notes, hoping
to illuminate some of the latter’s stranger conclusions.
His incorporation of Bergman’s (1935a, 1935b) data for
some species re-documented the breeding that Austin
had denied, but Tomek (1999, 2002), while including
Mauersberger’s own data, omitted Bergman’s and thereby
effectively reburied them.
The present review is not comprehensive. During the
1910-1945 Japanese occupation of Korea, most
ornithological work was published in Japanese, which we
cannot read. Won Hong Koo’s (1963-1965) Korean-
language country avifauna is available only through T omek
(1999, 2002). Information in Korean literature covering
the southern provinces is extracted, almost exclusively,
from Park Jin-Y oung (2002) . However, we think it unlikely
that fuller incorporation of Korean- andjapanese-language
sources would weaken, rather than strengthen, our
conclusions.
SPECIES AUSTIN INCORRECTLY
REJECTED AS KOREAN BREEDERS
This section treats the 43 species which Austin stated or
implied did not breed or regularly spend the summer in
Korea, for which evidence of summer residency is
contemporary with Austin’s review period. For 27 species
Austin rejected evidence or opinion of other people; for the
other 1 6, he had failed to register the relevant evidence. For
most land-birds, mid June-early August records are taken
as breeding-season presence. This is conservative:
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
27
nowadays, many species’ main passage ends within May
(personal observations) . For most smaller species, records
of non-breeders far from the breeding range during the
breeding season are exceptional; but for waterbirds, raptors
and some others, non-breeders occur far from breeding
grounds through the summer, so even multiple mid¬
summer records are only, at best, weakly indicative of
breeding. For species with pre-1948 breeding evidence
confined to breeding-season presence, firmer subsequent
information is given, particularly from the 1950s.
Information from the 1970s and later is included for pre-
1948 assessments that are not conclusive, but rarely
otherwise : the present work does not attempt to circumscribe
each species’ current Korean breeding range. As well as the
43 species below, 19 species now known or strongly
suspected to breed in Korea lack either strong pre-1948
indications of breeding or reason to invoke subsequent
colonisation, and ten species seem to have colonised since
the 1940s (Appendix 1, Category 5 and its footnote).
Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata
Austin called Mandarin a ‘not uncommon transient in
Korea’, commenting that Won Hong Koo’s statement
that it nests in North Pyongan province ‘has not been
credited by subsequent authors, for there is no breeding
evidence’. He overlooked Bergman’s (1935a) documented
breeding around Engan, as did Tomek (1999), who
required further evidence to consider it a breeder in
northern Korea. Bergman found several pairs at Engan
and saw the species in the Myohyang mountains in mid
June 1936 (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.); it was
confirmed breeding there in 2000-2003 (personal
observations). Gore and WonPyong-Oh (1971) accepted
it as a ‘rare resident’ (implying breeding) in southern
Korea, from where Park Jin-Young (2002) traced recent
summer records from four southern provinces after 1970,
including proof of breeding.
MALLARD Anas platyrhynchos
Taczanowski (1888) wrote that Mallards nested in small
numbers in Korea, but Austin stated that this view had
‘been disregarded by subsequent authors as unverified,
and fis] perhaps referable to the Spot-billed Duck’.
However, he was unaware that Yankovskii (in Tomek
1999) had observed small flocks of young Mallards around
Paekdu-san in August 1897, as did Tomek (1984) on 4
June 1980.
Harlequin Duck Histrionicus histrionicus
Tracing Korean records only between October and April,
Austin categorised Harlequin as a winter visitor. He did
not read Bergman’s (1935a) statement that it bred around
Engan; Bergman (1938) was not explicit about breeding,
but his records from inland mountains in late May-early
June clearly signal this possibility. Tomek (1999) also
overlooked this record, but traced three other summer
interior records (May 1960, June 1959 and July 1957 or
1958), implying that Harlequin is (or at least was) a regular
breeder, although Tomek (also unaware of Bergman’s
data) herself did not accept this.
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus senator
Yankovskii identified Red-breasted Mergansers at two
sites in the Tumen catchment in June and August 1897,
with two more sites from early September 1897 in the
Amnok catchment (Tomek 1999). There seems to be no
subsequent indication of Korean over-summering, and it
is perhaps odd that Yankovskii did not find Scaly-sided
Merganser, which was found at one of his sites (Musan)
in April 1912, and is now known to breed in this region
(e.g. BirdLife International 2001). Yankovskii’s
identification perhaps warrants review, but ZISP, where
some of Yankovskii’s skins are housed (Tomek 1 999: 6),
holds no specimens from Yankovskii’s trip of either this
species or Scaly-sided Merganser (V. Vysotsky in litt.
2006). Austin completely overlooked these records and
made no reference to the possibility of Korean breeding
for either species.
Hodgson’s Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx fugax
Austin wrote that ‘this cuckoo seems to be an uncommon
migrant in spring in the northwest corner of [North
Pyongan province]... Yamashina comments “it is not yet
certain that they breed in Korea, but according to the
collection dates, there is no doubt that they do so.” This
conclusion seems a bit far-fetched, however, and the 1 942
Hand-List Committee was not convinced of its breeding’.
No indication was given as to why it would be ‘far-fetched’,
and as Austin was not in Korea during this species’s
breeding season, he could not reasonably form an opinion
based on personal experience. T his species is very difficult
to see on its breeding grounds (personal observations), so
if the song is not known, it easily escapes detection.
Yamashina’s conclusion was evidently sound: there are
past Korean records from 21 June 1897 (Tomek 1999;
not known to Austin) and (listed by Austin), 27 July 1917
and June 1917. More recent surveys found the species a
common summer resident in the Myohyang mountains
during 2001-2003, singing from mid May to at least early
July in each year (personal observations), having also been
recorded there on 5 June 1956, late May 1980 and mid
June 1983 (Tomek 1984: 22, 1999); Park Jin-Young
(2002) traced recent summer records from five southern
provinces, and it is fairly common and vocal through the
breeding season in forest areas around Seoul, but apparently
less numerous soudiward (personal observations).
Collared Scops Owl Otus bakkamoena
Austin noted that ‘Yamashina and Won both say [Collared
Scops Owl] breeds in Korea, but the 1942 Hand-List
disagrees. Indeed, the evidence suggests that it breeds
north of the Korean peninsula, for Orii’s experience in
collecting so large a series. ..in so short a time can be
interpreted as nothing but a mass migratory movement’.
This may be so; but passage through an area does not
exclude the species from breeding there as well. Although
Austin traced only three specimens between April and
September (from ‘May’, 3 and 10 May), within a few
years there were specimens from 9 June 1954, 15 July
1956 and 17 June 1960 (Tomek 1999), all implying
breeding in northern Korea. In southern Korea, Gore
and Won Pyong-Oh (1971) considered it to be an
‘uncommon summer visitor’ (as well as passage migrant
and winter visitor) by implication to much or all of Korea,
but according to records in Park Jin-Young (2002), this
may have been based largely or only on presence during
the breeding season in areas excluded by Austin’s review
(e.g. Ullung Island). It seems it was overlooked in the
breeding season before Austin’s time, although Deignan
(1950: 191) took it to be a Korean breeder.
28
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
URAL Owl Strix uralensis
Austin asserted that ‘The Ural Owl is a rare visitor to
Korea. Though Won says it breeds there, there is no
proof. A specimen he traced from 29 May 1912 from
Nongsadong, Paekdu-san massif (see itinerary in Allen
and Andrews 1913) is now supported in season by June
1963 and August 1989 records from the same region, as
well as one in March 1936 (Tomek 1999, Duckworth
and Frisk in prep.). It is not a ‘rare visitor’: at Myohyang
it was frequently found during 2001-2003, singing at
least during March-July and in October (personal
observations) . Breeding may even be widespread in Korea:
summer residency is suggested by a breeding-season
record from North Hwanghae province in 1979 (MKN
and KUT 1987: 1 1) and dates of 5 March 1927 and 3
April 1928 (Kyonggi province; Austin 1948) compared
with timing of regular song in Myohyang. There are also
several very recent reports, supported by photographs, of
breeding in, for example, southern Kangwon Province,
posted on various internet sites without full supporting
details. Siberian populations show some autumn and
winter wandering (Cramp 1985), and more data are
needed for firm conclusion of status south of Myohyang.
Northern Hawk Owl Sumia ulula
Had Austin read Bergman (1935a, 1938) carefully, he
would have noted that Northern Hawk Owl bred around
Engan (and Bergman suspected breeding at a second site;
Duckworth and Frisk in prep.), but instead he called it a
‘straggler’, knowing of only one (January) record. Despite
further evidence through two specimens on 1 2 May 1965
and Won Hong Koo’s clear statement of breeding, T omek
(1999), who did not read Bergman either, cautioned
against ‘assignment of the Hawk Owl among the breeding
birds’. Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971: 420) had stated
that it was a ‘rare resident [of the Paekdu-san
area] ...breeding has not, however, been proved’. There
seem to be no subsequent Korean records, and whether
this owl is, or was, a regular breeder is unclear, because it
is highly eruptive and may breed well south of its usual
range in years when numbers are high (Cramp 1985).
Little Owl Athene noctua
Austin wrote that ‘so far as can be determined, Won had
no other data [than three winter specimens] on the
species. ..but in a later paper he says that the species is
rare, but breeds in Korea. Kuroda says ‘rare in Korea, but
a permanent resident surely by the date of the specimen,’
which is as unwarranted by the evidence as Won’s breeding
statement... from the record this species is a straggler, but
further investigation may show it to be of fairly regular
occurrence as a winter visitor’. Bergman found an active
nest on 9 June 1 936 at Ryongampho and collected a well-
grown nestling (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). Five of
13 northern Korean dates in Tomek (1999) were from
June (1949, 1960, 1962), July (1959) or August (1954),
so regular Korean breeding during Austin’s review period
is a reasonable assumption, and Gore and Won Pyong-
Oh (1971) called it ‘resident in north Korea’.
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
Austin’s statement of Common Sandpiper, that
‘Taczanowski (1888) was partly in error when he wrote
“small numbers in summer; nest near Seoul...”, for the
bird has never been known to breed in Korea’, was itself
in error: Bergman (1935b) reported it nesting along the
Chuul river in 1 935; he had various other breeding-season
sightings and in late June 1936, he considered it to be
obviously breeding at Myohyang (Duckworth and Frisk
in prep.). Austin cited without comment an AMNH
specimen from the northern highlands on 12 June 1912.
Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971: 39, 78) gave the first
breeding record for southern Korea as 1969, while
describing the species as a rare summer visitor, and T omek
( 1 999), who traced many June and July records from the
1950s and 1960s in the northern highlands, hence
erroneously concluded that the species had colonised
Korea after 1948, despite a further breeding-season record
she cited from Yankovskii on 21 June 1897.
Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus
Austin, tracing no Long-billed Plover records in May-
July, concluded that it ‘seems to be a not uncommon
spring and autumn transient’, despite his citing Won Hong
Koo’s statement that it bred and Kuroda’s that it probably
did so. Tomek (1999) presented records from 30 July
1954, 3 April 1956, 3 June 1960, and 18 and 26 July
1 897, and accepted it as probably breeding; the proof she
desired is supplied through Bergman’s observation of
several birds, clearly breeding, at Myohyang on 23 June
1936 (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). In southern Korea,
Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971) did not consider it to
nest, but nowadays it does so widely (Park Jin-Young
2002). Anecdotal accounts indicate that it was breeding
in at least one area of Kyonggi province by the 1960s or
earlier (Shim Kyu-Sik verbally 2008). It seems probable
that the species has long been under-reported in Korea.
Season-based assumptions of breeding status are risky,
because Long-billed Plover breeds early (at least in the
southern provinces): it is highly territorial in February
and March, pairs within March (e.g. copulation seen at
Suncheon on 13 March 1997), and lays eggs in April
(when it is very inconspicuous); young often disperse as
early as June, when summer rains flood out river-bed
breeding sites (personal observations). Also in Japan, it
starts nesting in mid-March (Brazil 1991). Hence, the
records that Austin traced from five provinces in March-
April might also involve breeders.
KENTISH Plover Charadrius alexandrinus
Describing Kentish Plover as a ‘not uncommon spring
and autumn transient’, Austin listed records from all
months between March and September (and from
January). Even though Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971)
followed Austin and called it solely a non-breeding visitor,
Kentish Plover breeds in at least the southern provinces.
Records in Park Jin-Young (2002) of Kentish Plover
collected in Seoul on 20 May 1910 and on 3 and 20 June
1913, and in Kyonggi province on 4 July 1957, 23 July
1958 and 6 June 1965, all indicate that it has summered
in Korea for many decades. Y oung were recorded as early
as 5 May near Seoul (Long et a!. 1988), but April records
cannot be assigned on date alone to likely breeders: spring
migration peaks only in late April (Long etal. 1988, Moores
1999a).
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus
Austin called Northern Lapwing ‘an uncommon spring
and autumn transient’, overlooking Yankovskii’s records
(in Tomek 1999) from two Tumen river sites during 28
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
29
May-1 1 June 1897. Tomek (1999) accepted the species
as a Korean breeder, reflecting references in Y ankovskii’s
notes to pairs of birds in river valleys and on open plains
and cultivated fields (T. Tomek in litt. 2007). Failed (or
non-) breeders do not consort as pairs (Cramp and
Simmons 1982). There seem to be no subsequent
breeding-season records.
OSPREY Pandion haliaetus
Austin did not locate Yankovskii’s Osprey records (in
Tomek 1999) from three northern highland sites during
22 June-20 July 1 897, demonstrating summer residence;
he assessed it as a rare passage migrant. There seem to be
no subsequent breeding-season records.
Black Kite Milvus migrans
Austin quoted Won’s statement that Black Kite ‘is common
and breeds’, cited late May and mid July sight-records
from Japanese observers, and wrote that ‘Kobayashi and
Ishizawa include Korea in its breeding range’, yet
concluded that ‘However, there is no evidence that the
species breeds in Korea, nor does the 1 942 Japanese Hand-
List consider that it does so’. In addition, he did not cite
various previous opinions in sources from which he quoted
widely elsewhere: ‘a constant resident at Soul, where it is
very numerous’ (Campbell 1892); very common
throughout the year (Taczanowski 1888); and ‘the
common kite of Seoul’ (Cumming 1935); and he knew
that Jouy collected a male in Seoul on 1 9 June 1 883 (Clark
1910). He was not aware that in the Chuul valley it was
seen from time to time in summer by Bergman (1935b),
who had little doubt that it bred in Korea (Duckworth and
Friskin prep.), still less that a chick was collected in Wonsan
on 19 June 1900 (Tomek 1999). While Austin was
publishing his conclusions, Wolfe (1950) was finding
several nests around Seoul, describing the kite as ‘a
comparatively common breeder in all of the central
area. ..equally at home either in the city streets or on the
uninhabited hills’; Fennell (1952) described it as a
‘common permanent resident’ around Seoul (if not Pusan;
but his precise localities do not include those where today
the bird occurs most regularly: personal observations);
and Prentice (1952) called it ‘very common’, occurring
‘right in the [city centres] of Seoul and Inchon’ in 1951 —
1 952. This species is thus a Korean breeder of long
standing, but by 1971, Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971:
83, 161) stated only that it was ‘a familiar sight over Seoul
and around towns and villages in the lowlands from mid-
October until early April. Large numbers [up to 270]
gather together over the capital prior to going to roost. It
breeds commonly on Cheju-do but is rare on the mainland
in summer. ..on the mainland scattered pairs breed
throughout the [southern provinces]’. This summation
suggests that breeding kites were already much decreased,
and Park Jin-Young (2002) detailed a subsequent
reduction throughout the southern provinces in the
number of wintering and migrant Black Kites away from
the south coast (and, outside the review area, the loss of
breeding birds from Cheju Island) . Nowadays in southern
Korea the species is only recorded regularly in the south¬
east (Park Jin-Young 2002, Moores and Moores 2002),
where winter roosts of up to 200 form in Pusan, and also
as a passage migrant, especially on offshore islands along
the west coast, most regularly in October (personal
observations) . When nesting was proven along the Korean
mainland south coast in 1999-2000, the species was
described as a recent addition to the breeding avifauna
(Park Jin-Young 2002, Moores and Moores 2002), but
these breeders are, conversely, the last remnants of a
formerly strong population (or, at best, a recolonisation) .
White-tailed Sea Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla
Austin did not trace the White-tailed Sea Eagle records
by Yankovskii (in Tomek 1999) from six northern
highland sites during 7 June-2 August (and at another
site on 24 May) 1897 (Tomek dated one site as ‘ 1 987’ in
error); instead, he called it a winter visitor, listing records
only for November-March. Breeding was recently
confirmed on Taehuksan Island (Park Jin-Young 2002),
and this raptor, which was eradicated from much of its
western range during the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries (Cramp and Simmons 1979), may already have
been much reduced, and hence largely overlooked, in
Korea by the start of the twentieth century.
Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis
Austin called this goshawk ‘an uncommon winter visitor
to Korea. I have been unable to verify Kuroda’s August
record, which was taken from unspecified sources. ..If
valid, it must have been a straggler, possibly wounded or
a sexually undeveloped bird, unable to make the northward
trek in springtime’: a bold statement for a country so
under-explored and a species that often breeds at such
low density (Cramp and Simmons 1979) that without
specific searching it is readily overlooked. Austin missed
Yankovskii’s (in Tomek 1999) record from Ryanggang
province in mid July 1897, and the conclusive evidence
of Bergman (in Duckworth and Frisk in prep.), who
documented the Korean practice of robbing every
Goshawk nest found so that the young could be trained
for falconry, and expressed concern over the consequent
rarity, by the 1930s, of breeding Goshawks in Korea.
This was a practice of very long standing: according to
two Korean government diplomatic handbooks, the
T'ongmun ' gwanji (1720, and ten subsequent editions)
and the Chungjong kyorinji (1802 and 1865), nearly 60
hawks annually were exported to Japan, but by 1 800, the
Japanese had requested that the value of the hawks be
converted into rice and cotton, and that was received
instead (Lewis 2003; J. B. Lewis in litt. 2008). There are
scenes of Koguryo people hunting Common Pheasants
with hawks, reportedly identifiable as Northern Goshawk,
in the mural of Anak Tomb No. 1 and others of this
period in Korea (Korean Central News Agency press
release, 10May2008). AnakTombNo. 1 was constructed
some time within the 4th-6th centuries AD, although we
have not confirmed that specific scenes are contemporary.
Grey-faced Buzzard Butastur indicus
Austin rebuffed Yamashina’s statement that this raptor
‘is not known to breed in Korea, but I think they probably
do’ with ‘a conclusion not shared by anybody else on
record’, calling the species ‘a not uncommon spring and
autumn transient and an occasional winter resident’,
despite listing specimens collected in June and July 1909
in Kyonggi province. In 1 948, Wolfe (1950) found three
breeding pairs in Kyonggi province, the only breeding
evidence for the southern provinces presented by Gore
and Won Pyong-Oh (1971). Juveniles in South Pyongan
province on 7 July 1961 and in Ryanggang province on 20
30
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
July 1962 (Tomek 1999) imply a wide Korean breeding
distribution. The few actual records reflect its typical
secrecy near nest sites (Mikhailov and Shibnev 1998).
There seem to be few recent indications of breeding in
Korea; Park Jin-Young (2002) listed only two recent mid¬
summer records. This mirrors dramatic declines in the
Russian Far East and Japan (Mikhailov and Shibnev 1998,
Kawakami and Higuchi 2003).
Common Buzzard Buteo buteo
Austin called this raptor ‘a common winter resident’, stating
that Won found it ‘common and breeding’ and that
‘Yamashina says “breeding range extends to Korea’”, but
concluding that ‘The 1 942 Hand-List makes no mention
of its breeding in Korea, and indeed, there is no evidence
that it does so’. There apparently remains no specific detail
of breeding, and this buzzard is only a winter visitor to
central and southern Korea (e.g. Gore and Won Pyong-
Oh 1971, Tomek 1999, Park Jin-Young 2002, personal
observations). Sight-records and specimens from
Ryanggang and North Hamgyong provinces in June-
August 1958-1988, from various sources (Tomek 1999),
imply regular over-summering at the least.
Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus
Austin described Common Kestrel as ‘a common migrant
throughout, and a common winter resident in the south
and central regions’. He did not discuss the possibility of
breeding, despite listing a 27 June 1930 specimen and
quoting Taczanowski (1888), who called it ‘resident’,
having earlier (Taczanowski 1887: 598) recorded it for
June and July (as well as in winter) in the Seoul area;
Clark (1910) also assumed that it bred in Korea. Four
specimens collected in Kyonggi province on 20 May 1934,
held in FMNH, apparently remained unpublished until
Park Jin-Young (2002). Bergman (1935b) saw the
occasional bird around the Chuul river valley in summer
1935; he collected the species in both June and July and
found a nest there on 28 June 1935 containing large
nestlings (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). Simultaneously
with Austin’s publication in 1 948, Wolfe (1950) found at
least five breeding pairs around Seoul; and in 1954,
Macfarlane (1963) found them breeding along the river
Imjin. Notwithstanding, some authors (e.g. Tomek 1 999)
have stated that Kestrels began breeding in Korea only
during the mid 20th century. Although Tomek (1999)
traced only three Pyongyang records before 1980 (1
January 1954, December 1954, 8 January 1958) but many
since, this does not imply a change in status: it coincides
with the arrival in northern Korea of European observers
accustomed to identifying raptors in the field, and may
also reflect behavioural change. Nesting Kestrels were
‘sly and wary around their nesting site’ (W olfe 1950), but
today in at least Pyongyang and Hyangsan they are very
noisy and confiding on town and rural buildings’ roofs
and upper storeys (personal observations). Wolfe (1950)
concluded that breeding Kestrels were overlooked in
Korea; he did not conjecture recent colonisation.
Eurasian Hobby Falco subbuteo
Historical evidence for Hobby as a Korean breeder rests on
Bergman, who (Bergman 1 935b) made incidental reference
to Hobby in summer 1935 from the Chuul valley. He was
personally convinced of its breeding there, seeing it
repeatedly during June, and collecting it as late as 1 9 June
1935 (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). Neither Austin nor
Tomek (1999) traced records from any pre-1948 dates
suggestive of breeding, but in 1960-1961 there were two
records in mid June and one in early July (Tomek 1999).
By the 1980s it was demonstrably not a rare breeder in
northern Korea, being a regular nester in, for example,
central Pyongyang (Fiebig 1993). Contrasting her
treatment with some other species, Tomek (1999) did not
invoke a recent status change. No historical breeding-season
records were traced from southern Korea by Park Jin-Y oung
(2002) and as late as 1971 it was still described as only a
‘regular passage migrant’ (Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971).
It is unclear whether breeders have become more common
or simply more recorded during recent decades.
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
Austin assessed Peregrine as ‘an uncommon, irregular
visitor to Korea’, reporting that Won’s statement of
breeding on high Korean mountains ‘has been disallowed
by subsequent authors’. He also followed Yamashina’s
caution over a purported clutch of four eggs from southern
Korea, collected on 26 March by Kobayashi and Ishizawa.
Wolfe (1950), however, who was sent a clutch of Peregrine
eggs from Kobayashi, collected on Chilbal Island on 2
April 1937, and examined a second clutch retained by
Kobayashi, stated that ‘I have examined both sets and
there is no doubt as to their identity’. Peregrine remains
regular throughout the breeding season on Chilbal and
adjacent islands today, as well as breeding at numerous
other sites in the southern provinces (personal
observations), bearing out Gore and Won Pyong-Oh
(1971) who called it an ‘uncommon summer resident’ in
southern Korea. Neff (1956) documented a 1953 nest on
Nan-Do island, although Tomek (1999), overlooking this,
hesitated to accept Peregrine as a breeder; the only
seasonally relevant records she traced from before the
1980s were two July records from the 1930s.
Japanese Paradise-flycatcher
Terpsiphone atrocaudata
Austin considered this bird ‘a rare transient of irregular
occurrence in southern Korea... Of dubious identity are
two sets of nests and eggs in the LiWong collection’, and
left without discussion records from 10-12 June and on
15 July. He was not aware that Bergman had observed
both sexes in forest outside Seoul on 12-13 July 1936
(Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). By the early 1960s the
species was proven to breed in central Korea in both
South Pyongan province and Kaesong city (Tomek 2002),
and it was stated to be ‘an uncommon summer visitor
throughout [southern] Korea’ by Gore and Won Pyong-
Oh (1971). This assessment was presumably based largely
on the five records of birds collected during summer in
three provinces during 1948-1971, as listed by Park Jin-
Young (2002), who also gave post- 197 1 records in June-
August from the same three provinces (Kyonggi, Kangwon
and South Kyongsang) and from South Cholla, where
breeding in June 2000 was detailed. Explicit confirmation
of breeding (away from Cheju, which lies outside the
review area), has been rare (Park Jin-Young 2002) but
this does not imply that it happens only irregularly.
Scaly Thrush Zoothera dauma
Austin opined that ‘Won says [Scaly Thrush] is
uncommon, but that it breeds, in which both Yamashina
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
31
and the 1942 Hand-List concur. But in view of the
specimen record, and the paucity of any other information,
the species can only be regarded as a transient’. A more
balanced appraisal would have terminated with ‘...can
only be regarded as of uncertain status’. A few breeding-
season records from northern Korea during the 1950s-
early 1960s included a nest with eggs (Tomek 2002),
while birds collected on 19 June 1957 in Seoul and on 3
June 1957 and 10 July 1964 at Kwangnung National
Arboretum (Park Jin-Young 2002) no doubt helped lead
Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971) to call it a ‘common
summer visitor; breeds in montane and submontane
forests throughout [southern] Korea’. Presumably, the
general secrecy of this bird when breeding accounts for
the paucity of past summer records: if its song is not
known it is readily overlooked (personal observations).
Grey-backed Thrush Turdus hortulorum
Austin cited Grey-backed Thrush records, as well as many
from passage seasons, from 22 June 1 933 and ‘June’, yet
called it a ‘not uncommon transient’. Within a decade of
his publication there were several further June-August
records from northern Korea, including a photograph of
a nest (T omek 2002) . Breeding was apparently not proven
in southern Korea until 1965, at Kwangnung National
Arboretum (Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971, Won Pyong-
Oh 1981, Park Jin-Young 2002).
Pale Thrush Turdus pallidus
A21 July 1934 Pale Thrush specimen from South Pyongan
province by Won was banished from discussion by Austin’s
calling this thrush ‘an uncommon spring and autumn
transient... all [sic\ the specimen records, except those of
Uchida from [South Cholla province], are during the
spring migration’. Fennell (1957) published a nest in
1957 (near Pusan) as the first Korean breeding record; in
subsequent decades it was recorded sparingly in summer
(Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971, Tomek 2002). The
1934 record suggests that it was overlooked previously;
in Korean hill forests, where it is today a common breeder,
it can be very difficult to see (personal observations).
Grey-streaked Flycatcher Muscicapa griseisticta
Bergman collected a fresh juvenile (identified at the time
as a Dark-sided Flycatcher) on 6 August 1935 at
Nongsadong (Duckworth and Frisk in prep.), but no
other data suggestive of Korean breeding were available
by 1948. In the 1950s specimens were collected in
northern Korea on eight June-July dates from five
localities (three close to Nongsadong); one was a
juvenile and a nest was also collected (Tomek 2002).
Dark-sided Flycatcher Muscicapa sibirica
Austin wrote that ‘there are no data in the literature other
than the above [none within 1 1 June-9 September], yet
the 1942 Hand-List says [Dark-sided Flycatcher] breeds
in Korea, which is improbable’. Austin did not have
Yankovskii’s Ryanggang province record (inTomek2002)
from 30 June 1 897, and there were records in July or on
1 August from four northern highland sites in the 1950s,
including several juvenile specimens (Tomek 2002).
Asian Brown Flycatcher Muscicapa dauurica
Despite tracing records of Brown Flycatcher as late as 25
June, Austin called it (only) ‘a common spring and autumn
transient. Won says it is common and breeds at
Non[g]sadong...Yamashina also surmises that it breeds
in Korea, a conclusion not followed by the 1942
Hand-List’. The multiple June -August specimens from
many northern highland localities during the 1950s
(Tomek 2002) vindicate Won’s and Yamashina’s views.
Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971) suspected it nested
even south of the Military Demarcation Line, although
this was only recently proven, with the first record being
ofyoung juveniles seen on 29 June 1994 (Park Jin-Young
2002).
Siberian Rubythroat Luscinia calliope
Austin’s citation of a record from 30 June 1914 sits uneasily
with his national status assessment, in total: ‘The Ruby-
throat is an uncommon transient in Korea’ . Despite citing
Bergman (1938) for some other species, he did not present
that source’s rubythroat breeding record from Gekatsuri
in summer 1935. The 1950s-1960s gave several July-
August records, with breeding again proven in 1951
(T omek 2002) , and there are recent midsummer records
from Kangwon province, whence came the June 1914
record (Park Jin-Young 2002, Choi Hui-Yeong 2004).
Evidently the species is, and long has been, a locally
common breeder in the northern and central highlands
(Duckworth 2006).
Orange-flanked Bush Robin Tarsiger cyanurus
Not being aware of Yankovskii’s records from three far
northern sites during 20 June- 15 July 1897 (in Tomek
2002), Austin called this species ‘a common spring and
autumn transient... a few winter’. Numerous records
during the 1950s showed this bird to be a common summer
resident in the northern highlands (Tomek 2002), and
this is probably still so: in 2001-2003 it was a common
high-altitude breeder at Myohyang (personal
observations).
White-cheeked Starling Stumus cineraceus
Despite tracing three June, one July and two August dates,
Austin asserted that this starling ‘is a common spring and
autumn transient... There is no definite record of the
species’ breeding in Korea, and though Y amashina (1933)
lists Korea as part of its breeding range, the 1942 Hand-
List gives it as just occurring. While some of the June and
August specimen records of adults are suggestive and
tempting, there is no evidence that it nests south of
Manchuria. No subsequent authority has given credence
to Y. Kuroda and Miyakoda’s (1919) statement that it
“occasionally nests in the eaves of big buildings in Seoul”.’
This latter statement was probably sound: Wolfe (1950)
found it to be a scarce breeder, in Seoul, in 1948, and
Bergman found it nesting at Shinten in 1935 (Duckworth
and Frisk in prep.). Tomek (2002) found various other
breeding-season records from Austin’s review period (28
May, 12 June and 7 July 1897 [three different sites]; 15
July and 20 August 1929; and 3 May 1941), as well as six
records between 30 May and August in the late 1940s-
1950s, and very many summer records from the 1960s
and later. To the southern provinces, Gore and Won
Pyong-Oh (1971) considered it a ‘common summer
visitor’, although Park Jin-Young (2002) traced no
summer specimen from before 1975 (16 June), and listed
the first summer flock of over 1 00 as late as July 1 987. It
is now a conspicuous breeder in towns and farmland,
32
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
abundant in some areas (e.g. Pyongyang; Fiebig 1995).
Whilst it has become more common as a Korean breeder
since Austin’s time, it was evidently nesting at least from
the nineteenth century.
EURASIAN TREECREEPER Certhia familiaris
Despite citing records from 2 June 1912 and July 1917,
Austin considered the Treecreeper ‘a not uncommon
transient throughout Korea’ and did not discuss the
possibility of breeding. Tomek (2002) traced several other
1950s records from June-August, including a July 1959
juvenile, although Park Jin-Young (2002) listed no
breeding-season records from the southern provinces
before 1982, when ten were seen between May and
September on Chiri-san.
WINTER Wren Troglodytes troglodytes
Tracing no specimen between 26 April and 21 October,
Austin stated that ‘Southern Korea is unquestionably
only its wintering ground. While it may possibly breed in
secluded high mountain valleys in Korea, it seems
improbable’, despite then citing a sight record for 25 May
1931, and the opinions of Taczanowski (1888) and
Campbell (1892) that Winter Wren was resident. He
concluded with ‘Won says it is common and that it breeds,
to which Yamashina and the 1942 Hand-List agree, but
the evidence does not support the claim’ and then
ironically endorsed Cumming’s (1933) statement that
the Korean birds probably breed in Siberia. During the
1950s-1960s the many breeding-season records
throughout Korean mountains showed it to be a
widespread summer resident (Gore and Won Pyong-Oh
1971, Tomek 2002). Bergman’s observations in summer
1935 in the far-northern hills (Duckworth and Frisk in
prep.), and a Chagang province specimen overlooked by
Austin from well before his defined autumn migration
season (6 September 1897; Yankovskii in Tomek 2002)
are, surprisingly, the only other summer records in his
review period.
GOLDCREST Regulus regulus
Austin traced no Goldcrest specimen or sight record
between 8 May and 24 September and stated that ‘Won
says it... breeds in Korea, in which observation he is not
joined by the 1942 Hand-List, though there is a
questionable set of eggs and nest in the LiWong Museum’ .
Tomek (1999) left a specimen from 5 July 1966
(Ryanggang province) in limbo: she felt unhappy to
consider Goldcrest as a Korean breeding bird, based upon
the distance to the nearest known breeding area, but she
did not cite breeding in Heilongjiang province, northeast
China (Cheng 1 987), and it is a locally common breeder
further south in Japan (Brazil 1991). Bergman (in
Duckworth and Frisk in prep.) also wondered about
Korean breeding, but the first detailed proof did not come
until summer 2002, when Goldcrest was found on every
visit to the highest-altitude (Wonman-Piro) area of
Myohyang (personal observations): single singing males
on 10-11 June and 1-5 July 2002; two birds on 1 2 June,
26 and 28 August 2002, with at least one juvenile on the
last date. These records, from two localities within the
high altitude old-growth spruce Pz'cea-dominated forest
just below the treeline, were in typical far-eastern breeding
habitat: Russian taiga breeding birds are often in spruce
(Cramp 1992) with Japanese ones in ‘dense coniferous
forests. ..in the mountains’ (Brazil 1991). It is more likely
that it was overlooked through its narrow breeding-season
habitat use, rather than that these Myohyang birds were
recent colonists.
Brown-eared Bulbul Ixos amaurotis
Austin’s statement that ‘I found bulbuls... at Seoul every
time I went there between December and April, and
encountered it... around Suwon from January until the
end of April’ has no direct value in assessing the species’s
summer status: he left Korea on 3 May. He nonetheless
asserted that it was a ‘not uncommon winter visitor to the
southern half of Korea,’ based on his own fieldwork, the
Korean specimens known to him (all from four southern
provinces, all but one during October-April), and on
Taczanowski (1887, 1888), who found the species
common in the Seoul area in winter 1886-1887, but absent
the following winter. He listed a summer-time sight record
(25 May 1931, North Chungchong province), with no
comment, and neither he nor Park Jin-Young (2002)
were aware that Bergman (in Duckworth and Frisk in
prep.) had observed this bulbul outside Seoul on 12-13
July 1936. Fennell (1952) found it common in summer
in Pusan right through his stay (March-October 1948),
while there were June, July and August specimens from
South Pyongan province in 1952-1954 (Tomek 2002).
The first summer-time bulbul collected in the southern
provinces listed by Park Jin-Young (2002) came in 1953,
from North Kyongsang province. Macfarlane (1963) still
considered it a winter visitor (late September-late April)
to his study site at the Imjin river near Seoul in 1954.
Even though Park Jin-Young (2002) noted no summer¬
time specimen from Kyonggi province until 1963, nor
from Kangwon and South Kyongsang provinces until
1966, by 1 96 1 Won Pyong-Oh (1961: 87-88) had already
described the species as a ‘permanent resident in
[southern] Korea’, conceding that there were ‘no exact
data on the breeding of this bird in Korea’, but reporting
eight specimens collected during July-September (seven
from Kwangnung national arboretum and one from South
Kyongsang province). A decade later Gore and Won
Pyong-Oh (1971) categorised the species as a common
resident and winter visitor to the southern provinces. In
sum, Brown-eared Bulbul was summering at least locally
in the mainland southern provinces in the 1930s, becoming
more widespread in the 1 950s- 1 960s, and is now common
all year in Korea south of c.40°N, including the cities of
Pyongyang and Seoul (Fiebig 1995,ParkJin-Young2002,
Tomek 2002). Its urban occurrence, conspicuousness to
eye and ear, and the evident familiarity of some historical
observers with the species, suggest a genuine major range
expansion on the Korean mainland.
White-browed Chinese Warbler
Rhopophilus pekinensis
Austin wrote that ‘Chinese Babbler is a rare visitor to
Korea, of uncertain status. Won states that it is common
and breeds, but the Japanese have not accepted his
opinion’, despite then giving four June-July specimen
dates. Several further records from May-July in the 1950s-
1 960s convinced Tomek (2002) that it is a ‘rare breeding
species’, while Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971) wrote
that ‘there are a number of recent summer records and it
is known to breed in north Korea, but breeding still has
to be proved [in southern Korea]’.
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
33
Thick-billed Warbler Acrocephalus aedon
Being unaware of the fledgling collected by Bergman on
2 August 1935 at Nongsadong (Duckworth and Frisk in
prep.), Austin (1948) did not even discuss the possibility
ofThick-billed Warbler breeding in Korea. Tomek (2002)
thought it might breed, solely through a specimen dated
13 June 1955; but this is little later than known passage
dates (Duckworth 2006). There has apparently been no
evidence of breeding in Korea since Bergman’s; Tomek
(2002) suspected that it may be at best peripheral.
Pallas’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus proregulus
Austin assessed this warbler as a passage migrant: he
traced no records between 25 May and 13 September.
He knew of neither Yankovskii’s (in Tomek 2002)
Ryanggang province record from 30 June 1897, or
Bergman’s (1935a) description of a nest from Engan.
Many further June-August records in the 1950s-1960s
(Tomek 2002) indicate that the species breeds widely in
the northern highlands.
Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
Austin called Grey W agtail ‘ a common spring and autumn
transient’, grudgingly conceding that ‘it is doubtfully a
summer resident in the north’; but Bergman (1935b) had
already observed fledged young along the Chuul river; he
found it at several sites in midsummer (Duckworth and
Frisk in prep . ) . Also unknown to Austin, a nest was found
near Wonsan on 9 May 1903 (Sweet et al. 2007), and
Yankovskii (in Tomek 2002) recorded the species in
Ryanggang province on 8 June and 6-8 August 1897.
Austin’s disparagement of Korean breeding is baffling:
he cited a June record from Seoul (Taczanowski 1887),
Taczanowski’s (1888) comment that it ‘nests’, Campbell’s
(1892) assessment as a ‘summer visitor’, and stated ‘Y.
Kuroda and Miyakoda give its season in Seoul as from
early April to late October, adding “nest not yet found,
but we often see young with yellow at the base of the bill,
so they seem to nest near by”.’ Within a few years of
Austin’s statement, breeding, or at least summer presence,
was recorded in central Korea by Fennell (1952) and
Macfarlane ( 1 963), and June and July records came from
many northern sites in the 1950s (Tomek 2002); it is a
common breeder across the country (Gore and Won
Pyong-Oh 1971, Tomek 2002).
COMMON ROSEFINCH Carpodacus erythrinus
This rosefmch was omitted entirely from Austin’s book,
despite several breeding-season records: Yankovskii and
Won Hong Koo (in Tomek 2002) recorded it on 3 July
1897 and 8 August 1939 respectively from the northern
highlands, while Bergman collected many specimens and
was sure that it bred at both Engan and Gekatsuri in 1 935
(Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). Many breeding-season
records came from various northern highland localities in
the 1950s-1960s (Tomek 2002).
PALLAS’S ROSEFINCH Carpodacus roseus
Austin called Pallas’s Rosefmch an ‘irregular winter
visitor’, although the 11 May 1918 date he cited from
North Hamgyong province is weeks after spring passage
through inland central Korea ends (early April; personal
observations). Tomek (2002) traced subsequent records
from 15 June 1960, 5 June 1980 (omitted from Tomek
1984 but reconfirmed by T. Tomek in litr. 2006), and 29
June and 1 July 1 983, but still hesitated to call it a Korean
breeder. Breeding remains unproven but plausible; the
species is undoubtedly regular in midsummer.
Tristram’s Bunting Emberiza tristrami
Austin assessed this bunting as ‘a spring and autumn
transient’, tracing no records within 31 May to 13
September. He was unaware of Yankovskii’s (in Tomek
2002) records from two Ryanggang province sites during
30 June-1 1 July 1897. Numerous further records during
June-August in the 1 950s-l 960s (Tomek 2002) revealed
a wide breeding distribution across Korea’s northern
highlands.
DISCUSSION
The scale and strength of the unjustified rejections
of Korean breeding status
A good review draws conclusions only where the evidence
merits them; Austin discarded the necessary caution with
the 43 species discussed above. For 27 of them, he knew
of records that should have led him, if he felt unable to
accept others’ testimony that they bred in Korea, at least
to leave unresolved whether or not they did so. Instead,
he made unambiguous, often strongly-worded, exclusions
(a slight margin of doubt conceded for two species) of
Korean breeding or even summer residence. Breeding-
season records for several species (e.g. Northern Goshawk)
were parried with contrived excuses, while for others (e.g.
Grey-backed and Pale Thrushes) the records were,
although listed in the data section, simply ignored in the
discussion. For the other 1 6 species, Austin did not search
carefully enough to find the data that contradict his
conclusions. For those species known by summer records
during Austin’s review period but proven to nest only
shortly afterwards, their long standing as Korean breeders
is a more parsimonious explanation than a simultaneous
joint colonisation around 1948. This is also the case for
19 Korean breeding species for which strong suspicions
of Korean breeding come from only after 1 948 (Appendix
1, Category 5). Ten species (footnote to Category 5)
seem likely to have colonised Korea since Austin, but past
data are too scanty to assess whether any species visually
inconspicuous in the breeding season is a recent colonist
or was simply overlooked. For a further 28 species
(Appendix 1, Category 3), Austin was more balanced:
although not accepting others’ explicit views of Korean
nesting, he did admit its possibility.
Austin was not prophetic in which species to reject as
breeders and which to leave unresolved. It is still unclear
whether 1 4 species about which Austin was open-minded
do breed in Korea (Appendix 1 , Category 6) . In addition
to the 43 species which Austin rejected as Korean breeders
despite contemporary evidence (Category 4), he dismissed
(explicitly or implicitly) 20 more (five with contemporary
claims of breeding) for which true status remains
unresolved (Category 7). Only two species where Austin
directly and strongly rebutted another’s authority of
breeding in Korea, Merlin (Won and, not mentioned by
Austin, Clark 1910) and Chestnut Bunting (Won) would,
based on regional distribution, be very surprising as
Korean breeders. Only if Austin’s sources had falsely
suggested numerous species breeding in Korea would his
propensity to reject these sources be valid.
34
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Austin was cautious of equating undoubted summer
residency with breeding (Appendix 1, Category 2),
although he approached his limit with Carrion Crow:
‘while it seems ridiculous to question the fact that this
species breeds in Korea, which all recent authorities
accept, there is no proof of it whatever beyond the
specimen collection dates’. (In fact there was, albeit
unpublished: Bergman [in Duckworth and Frisk in prep.]
documented nesting in 1935-1936.) This caution is
preferable to his refusal to assign even the possibility of
summer residency to the 43 species in Category 4, but
seems excessive for the many species with many breeding-
season records.
Table 1. Vaurie’s assignment of breeding-season Korean status for 43
species erroneously rejected as breeders by Austin.
Species
Vaurie’s
assessment
Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos
Harlequin Duck Histrionicus histrionicus
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus senator
Hodgson’s Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx fugax
Collared Scops Owl Otus bakkamoena
URAL OWL Strix uralensis
Northern Hawk Owl Sumia ulula
Little Owl Athene noctua
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus
Kentish Plover C. alexandrinus
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus
OSPREY Pandion haliaetus
Black Kite Milvus migrans
White-tailed Sea Eagle Haliaeetus albitilla
Northern Goshawk Acdpiter gentilis
Grey-faced Buzzard Butastur indicus
Common Buzzard Buteo buteo
Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus
Eurasian Hobby F. subbuteo
Peregrine Falcon F. peregrinus
Japanese Paradise-flycatcher
Terpsiphone atrocaudata
SCALY Thrush Zoothera dauma
Grey-backed Thrush Turdus homdorum
Pale Thrush T. pallidus
Grey-streaked Flycatcher
Muscicapa griseisticta
Dark-sided Flycatcher M. sibirica
Asian Brown Flycatcher M. dauurica
Siberian Rubythroat Luscinia calliope
Orange-flanked Bush Robin
Tarsiger cyanurus
White-cheeked Starling Stumus cineraceus
Eurasian Treecreeper Certhia familiaris
WINTER Wren Troglodytes troglodytes
GOLDCREST Regulus regidus
Brown-eared Bulbul Ixos amaurotis
White-browed Chinese Warbler
Rhopophilus pekinensis
Thick-billed Warbler Acrocephalus aedon
Pallas’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus proregulus
Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea
COMMON ROSEFINCH Carpodacus erythrinus
Pallas’s Rosefinch C. mseus
Tristram’s Bunting Emberiza tristrami
Does not breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
May breed
Does not breed
Breeds
Does not breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
May breed*
Breeds
Does not breed
May breed**
May breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
May breed
Does not breed
May breed
Does not breed
May breed
Does not breed
May breed
May breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
Breeds
Breeds
Does not breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
Breeds
Breeds
May breed
Does not breed
May breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
Breeds
Does not breed
Does not breed
Does not breed
*‘recorded once during the summer’.
**‘breeding records are lacking for Korea’ (by implication of the
text, it would be expected to breed there).
In total, Austin classed only 84 species as confirmed
Korean breeders (Appendix 1, Category 1), totalling,
with 17 species for which he saw summer residency as
indicating Korean breeding (Category 2), 101 Korean
breeding species . A further 42 species were left of uncertain
summer status (Categories 3, 6). Austin’s total range, of
101-143 breeding species, was at least a 30-50%
underestimate: 62 further species are known or were likely
to have been breeding in Korea during 1880-1948
(Categories 4, 5); further Korean breeders surely remain
unfound (Categories 6-8 include 43 species with
indications to date), while others may have disappeared
before breeding was detected. By 1 948, knowledge of the
breeding avifauna remained significantly incomplete for
most continental countries outside western Europe and
North America, simply because large tracts of land
remained un- or under-explored; but we know of no other
country with its breeding avifauna so seriously under¬
estimated through rejection and oversight of existing
information.
The fate of the unjustified rejections
For dozens of species, Austin confused an absence of (to
him, solid) breeding data with a genuine lack of a Korean
breeding population. In effect, almost any species without
proof of breeding was, by default, a visitor or straggler.
Such an attitude suits well-surveyed avifaunas, e.g.
Austin’s own (in the U.S.A.), but not poorly researched
ones. Subsequent readers have not critically distinguished
the facts of Austin’s data-set from the conclusions he drew
from it. The latter have been repeated as factual, so that
particularly for Common Sandpiper and Common
Kestrel, twentieth-century breeding colonisation of Korea
has, erroneously, become accepted wisdom, while the
beleaguered Black Kite is stated to be only a very recent
breeder. Moreover, Tomek (1999) evidently concluded
that breeding Oriental Scops Owls colonised Korea only
after Austin, even though the latter had not excluded the
possibility of breeding (Appendix 1) and had quoted
(without endorsing) Won’s 1930s record of breeding and
statement that it was'common. Won was doubtless correct:
Bergman (in Duckworth and Frisk in prep.) independently
proved breeding in central Korea in the mid- 1930s.
Austin’s conclusions had a strong impact on following
ornithological publications: for the 43 species he rejected
as breeders despite contemporary evidence, V aurie (1959,
1 965) did not question his conclusions for 25 species; he
accepted only seven as breeding in Korea, and left 1 1
uncertain (Table 1). Even later, ‘Austin (1948)’ is widely
quoted for Korean status in definitive sources such as
Birds of the Western Palearctic (Cramp and Simmons 1 977,
and subsequent volumes). Most species that Austin
assessed in error have been quietly absorbed into the
perceived Korean breeding fauna, on the (usually implicit)
assumption that they were there all along, but several are
still contested as Korean breeders, e.g. Harlequin Duck,
Northern Hawk Owl, Northern Goshawk and Goldcrest,
as well as some species not even suspected by anyone, as
far as we can tell, during Austin’s review period to breed,
e.g. Eurasian Bullfinch.
Austin’s ability to inform himself
Austin’s personal authority to draw Korea-wide
conclusions about bird status, especially in the breeding
season, was limited. He was based at Suwon, ‘30 miles
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
35
south of Seoul, in the heart of the coastal rice-producing
belt’, calling it ‘one of the poorest collecting grounds in
Korea, with but scant cover’ (p. 25); and, moreover, he
was only in Korea from November 1 945 to 3 May 1 946,
thus arriving months after most species stop breeding
and departing well before the breeding season is in
full swing (and he knew this through the ‘many
dependable migration dates’ of a light-house keeper; p.
20). Further, in Austin’s time, travel within Korea was
difficult and restricted (Fennell 1952), and there is no
evidence that Austin ranged, still less collected, far from
Suwon and a few major cities; he managed to collect only
90 species and saw several score more (p. 25). All this
should have instilled Austin with considerable caution
over rejecting others’ statements, but his accounts, e.g.
for Common Kestrel, show him extrapolating non¬
breeding status at Suwon to a national scale, overriding
contradictory evidence. National-level inference from any
single site is untenable; and Suwon, on Austin’s
description, seems a particularly inappropriate one from
which to have done this.
Austin did not compensate for his limited field
experience by comprehensively trawling specimens and
literature, despite his text’s implications. He claimed ‘a
review of all the literature available’ (p. 3), but as well as
not reading Bergman (1935a, 1935b), which he cited, he
did not mention Sowerby (1923) orYankovskii (1898).
Explicitly, only ‘museums and private collections in Korea,
Japan and the United States’ were covered, written sources
(e.g. Campbell 1892) being used for European holdings.
He knew of Bergman’s and Anderson’s (see Anderson
1907) collections (and, incidentally, massively
overestimated the quantity of Korean peninsula bird
specimens in the latter, at c. 1 000; only c. 1 50 are listed in
the NHM accessions register; M. Andrews in lilt. 2005),
both then undocumented. Anderson’s collection contains
breeding-season material only from Cheju (M. Andrews
in litt. 2005), but Bergman’s is one of the richest breeding-
season collections ever made in peninsular Korea
(Duckworth and Frisk in prep.). Austin was unaware of
breeding-season collections such as Yankovskii’s ( 1 898),
and more may yet surface.
Even his review of American holdings was not
complete: as he himself stated (pp. 10-1 1), he covered
only part of the large late-spring Hall collection from
1903. This makes his strong stances all the more
puzzling, e.g. his dismissal (p. 113) concerning the
inclusion of Korea within the range of Greater Sand
Plover Charadrius leschenaultii as given in the Hand-List of
Japanese birds with ‘there is not a Korean specimen
traceable in any collection today, or in any of the
literature’, when in fact Hall’s two birds lay in AMNH
(Sweet et al. 2007). Even for species genuinely lacking
specimens, there should have been great caution in
firmly concluding breeding-season absence at the national
level. Most collectors spread effort unequally over the
available habitats and altitudes, and even within the areas
they cover, they may be highly selective for species.
Delacour (1929) was unusual in making explicit that he
did not collect common migrant species; most collections
give no indication of the extent and types of selection
exercised. By 1948, large tracts of Korea were known
only from one, if any, extensive breeding-season collection,
making assertions of absence a rash undertaking — as is
shown here.
Austin’s reactions to his sources
Austin worked with many status assessments that, neither
containing nor citing primary data, were hard to evaluate .
Chief among these was the multi-edition Hand-list of
Japanese birds (Ornithological Society of Japan 1922, 1932,
1942); Japan, before 1945, occupied Korea. Austin’s
(p. 19) lengthy critique stated that it ‘all too frequently
makes cryptic, dogmatic statements for which no
substantiation can be found’. Such sources seem to have
sparked or intensified in him a mission to expunge
everything for which he could find either no or (to him)
merely questionable substantiation. This would have been
helpful had he called past statements into question pending
confirmatory data, rejecting them only where he
documented that they stemmed from false data, such as
misidentified specimens. Instead, he fell into a dismissive
outlook not unusual among Europeans and Americans
when confronted with the radically different knowledge
systems that they found in Asia (see, e.g., Fan 2000).
Austin’s language, often heavy-handed (e.g. Hodgson’s
Hawk Cuckoo, above), shows him warming to his task as
he became assured of carrying his readers with him, e.g.
(p. 73) ‘Won says [Eurasian Sparrowhawk is common
and that it ‘breeds deep in the mountains’, which in itself
is suspicious’. Quite why it is ‘suspicious’ is not revealed:
on the contrary, given the documented heavy nest-raiding
to which Goshawks were subjected (see above), remote
areas were probably the most likely places for raptors to
persist. Austin seems to have felt that assigning breeding
status to a species was a pernicious temptation to be fought
against, implicitly praising himself for not bending to it
with White-cheeked Starling (see above), and seems to
have seen in himself better mastery of such feelings than
was possessed by most other people.
Austin’s feeling of superiority was partly nationalistic.
As an American, he lamented the delay between the
American P. L. Jouy’s collection in Korea in 1 883-1886,
and Clark’s (1907) naming of the new taxa within. Such
phrases as ‘and the first of Jouy’s previously collected
[potential] types was lost to America by Taczanoski’s
[1887] description of the Korean Crested Lark’ (p. 9),
and. ‘and the types of two more common Korean
birds. ..went to the British Museum while Jouy’s identical
material collected almost ten years earlier still lay
unattended in Washington [U.S.A.]’ (p. 9) show how it
irked him that these others were Polish and British, or, at
any rate, not American. He also wrung his hands over the
delayed attention to (the American) Roy Chapman
Andrews’s skins: ‘and it contains adequate material of
half a dozen or more valid subspecies which were described
subsequently either by Europeans from material taken
later in nearby Ussuria, or by the Japanese from the birds
Orii collected in Hamgyong Pukto almost twenty years
later!’ (p. 13). This reflects patriotic competitiveness in
‘race to the Pole’-style geographical exploration; Teddy
Roosevelt said in 1909, on return to the U.S.A. from an
overseas biological expedition, that "I wanted to have
Uncle Sam [= the U.S.A.] have a first-class collection,
possibly a little better than anybody else’ (Cutright 1956).
It seems to have been but a small step further for Austin
to assume that other nationalities writing of Korean birds
might therefore bolster their findings through unwarranted
extrapolations. He generally scorned Japanese
endeavours, shown best by his occasional patronising
praise ofthem: Yamashina’s (1933, 1941) Natural history’
36
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
of Japanese birds ‘compares well with modern American
and English treatises of a similar nature’ (p. 1 7), while T.
Momiyama ‘described fourteen fancied new forms from
Korea alone, none of which is recognizable, and most of
which, to their credit be it said, were invalidated by other
Japanese’ (p. 19). Writing in the aftermath of the second
world war, which had pitted Japan against America, such
a bias is symbolised by Austin dedicating his book ‘to
American Military Government’; the latter underwrote
his time in Korea. After training for the ‘invasion and
occupation of Japan’, Austin was ‘reassigned and shipped
off to Korea... to learn about Koreans, and about Korean
culture, customs and geography, “the hard way”.’ (p. 24).
On the victor’s side, he seems to have matched political
rebirth with a self-set mandate to wipe the ornithological
slate clean too, thereby swinging his objectivity of
judgement. Austin’s Auk obituary described him as ‘an
intense, provocative, man’ of ‘strong personality and
opinion’ (Clench and Hardy 1989), and these traits
reduced the scientific authority of his first national avifauna .
Austin and Professor Won Hong Koo
Austin aimed a few broadsides at nineteenth-century
Europeans’ opinions, but his most pervasive suspicions
attended the conclusions of Won Hong Koo, the first and
foremost Korean ornithologist. Although Austin (pp. 20-
21) felt ‘forced to... acknowledge his accomplishments’
this was qualified with ‘as outstanding among his people’ .
He (p. 64) wrote that ‘Won calls [GadwallH/zus strepera]
common, but inasmuch as he calls the Wigeon [A. penelope ]
rare, which I found common, his field identification in
this case may be questioned’. Austin wrote this on the
basis of a few months in Korea, mostly at one site, and
these species, not readily confusable, are both common
in Korea (e.g. Fiebig 1993). He remarked that ‘Won calls
[Fork-tailed Swift] common in Pyongan Namdo, and
says it nests there in an old castle near Anju. The species
is known definitely to breed in Korea only on offshore
islands...’; Won’s account from his town of long-term
residence clearly was not definitive in Austin’s eyes.
Various of Won’s dates suggestive of breeding and
included in Austin’s lists of Korean records were not
considered even worthy of specific rebuttal (e.g. Pale
Thrush) . Austin rejected no less than 1 6 of Won’s breeding
claims (Appendix 1 , Categories 4, 7), and seriously queried
20 others (Appendix 1, Categories 3, 6); these figures do
not include those species, if any, which Won called
breeders for which Austin did not repeat the statement.
Austin never met W on, nor had access to his collection,
yet still felt entitled to announce that ‘Won seems to have
been fired by a patriotic ambition (lamentably universal
among enthusiasts of every nationality including the
American) to compile as large a list of species and
subspecies as possible. . .The number of forms he
dogmatically states breed in Korea exceeds those that
actually do, and as he makes other similar misstatements
with no attempt at proof, it is difficult to know when to
believe his more probable assumptions’ (p. 22). This
attribution of patriotic cause reflected Austin’s own
outlook. His easy dismissal of statements at variance with
his own perceptions is typical of early westerners in the
‘mysterious East’, e.g. Sampson (1984 [reprint]) in the
1 860s who labelled a Chinese text’s statement of fruit size
as ‘doubtless an Oriental exaggeration’. The double irony
here is that in most cases where Austin presented and
then dismissed Won’s breeding claims, Won was correct
(see above), and that Austin had no ‘proof for his own
equally dogmatic pronouncements. Austin rationalised
his untenable position with (p. 22) ‘The Japanese, though
guilty to a lesser degree of the same negligence [as Won] ,
solved the problem by not believing him at all’.
Austin found ‘the Korean scientists not only lacking
in knowledge and ability, but regrettably ignorant of any
conception of the meaning of truth’ (p. 23). Anybody
harbouring the prejudice oozing from his section on truth
and ‘the Oriental mind’ (p. 23) would feel entitled to
dismiss opinions or facts presented by any such mind. It
is critically important to understand that Austin did just
this for whatever sat inconveniently with his own
preconceptions. His culturally-biased double-standards
are best illustrated through Arctic Warbler. Despite his
hard line on such distinctive species as Mandarin Duck,
Austin accepted that Arctic Warbler was ‘perhaps a not
uncommon summer resident in the highlands’ (p. 216),
although all evidence of this is patently flawed (Duckworth
2007). Even though Austin (p. 276) expressed concern
over the general reliability of the Canadian D. J.
Cumming’s (1933) work, and even though Phylloscopus
presented some of the toughest species-level identification
challenges in Korea (using Austin’s species limits), Austin
quoted Cumming at length on the genus, with no caveat;
yet Cumming clearly had confounded Arctic Warbler
with its congeners (Duckworth 2007).
Austin’s influence on today’s attitudes
Austin’s assessment of Korea’s pre-1948 avifauna is far
more accessible to subsequent researchers than are many
of his primary sources. As well as muddling the real
historical status of Korean birds, his hectoring tone has
left a further damaging legacy: subsequent reviewers have
felt entitled widely to dismiss or question Won Hong
Koo’s conclusions. Well after the publication of Austin,
The birds of Korea (Won Hong Koo 1963-1965) expanded
the number of species stated to breed in Korea, reflecting
continued collection by Won and colleagues. The next
foreign-authored review of northern Korean birds (Tomek
1999, 2002) severely questioned Won’s statements of
eight species as Korean breeders (Harlequin Duck,
Eurasian Curlew, Common Greenshank, ‘Herring gull
Larus argentatus’ , Cinereous Vulture, Narcissus
Flycatcher, Eurasian Bullfinch and Rustic Bunting)
further to repeating Austin’s doubts on several others.
This total is a minimum: Tomek (1999, 2002) did not
cite Won’s (1963) claims of Swan Goose breeding in
Korea (BirdLife International 2001), and may have treated
other species similarly. By contrast with Austin, Tomek
usually strongly questioned, rather than rejected, the
claims, and gave reasons: usually the distance to nearest
known breeding grounds and/or the lack of specific data.
Three of the eight (Harlequin Duck, ‘Herring Gull’ and
Eurasian Bullfinch) do breed in Korea (Appendix 1), and
some of the others may well yet be found to do so. Vaurie
(1959, 1965) did not list any of these eight species as even
possible Korean breeders.
A further damaging consequence of the apparent
authority of Austin is that subsequent workers do not
systematically seek and check pre- 1 948 sources. The most
comprehensive recent assessment of birds in the southern
provinces (Park Jin-Young 2002) listed over 160
references but included only four pre-dating Austin. For
I
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
37
the northern provinces, Tomek (1999, 2002) gave fresh
interpretation to Giglioli and Salvadori (1887),
Taczanowski (1887, 1888), Kuroda (1918) and, most
significantly, Won Hong Koo, but not to Campbell (1892),
Clark (1910), Yamashina (1932), Cumming (1933),
Bergman (1935a, 1935b, 1938) oranyjapanese-language
sources.
In sum, the many species where primary data negate
Austin’s (and others’) dismissal of Won Hong Koo’s
assessments lead us to recommend that the latter should
be taken as plausible when evaluating the historical status
of Korean birds, unless there is a specific, convincing,
doubt (as with Arctic Warbler; Duckworth 2007), even
though there are problems in the detail of some records.
Won put in his account of Long-tailed Duck Clangula
hyemalis many data Austin presented for Harlequin Duck
(Tomek 1999: 71); and data for individual records often
do not correspond between the specimens in the Academy
of Sciences collection and Won’s book, even though the
latter was based on the former (T. Tomek in litt. 2004).
At least partly this is because later collection staff re¬
copied specimen labels and destroyed the old ones. This
practice always loses data (Rasmussen and Prys-Jones
2003) and retained earlier labels exposed copying errors
(Tomek 1999: 108). Errors of detail are inevitable in any
large-scale compilation of records: many may come from
typists, editors and typesetters, followed by poor proof¬
reading, so do not invalidate conclusions. In most cases
Won’s conclusions will have reflected years of direct field
experience of his team, not microscopic examination of
pooled individual records.
Other problems with Austin’s species accounts
This review covers only breeding status, but Austin’s
assertive statements about winter status also warrant
attention. For example, both Coal and Varied Tits were
called summer residents, wintering only in the far south.
This certainly does not reflect today’s situation (Tomek
2002) and probably not even that pre-1948: Bergman (in
Duckworth and Frisk in prep.) found Coal Tits right
through winter 1935-1936 in the harsh northern
highlands. Various other factors urge caution with Austin’s
conclusions and even the data he presented, irrespective
of season.
Firstly, while accepting most specimen identifications
as given, Austin rejected various taxa morphologically
similar to others and which he thought unlikely to occur
in Korea, without necessarily having examined the
specimens. He did this with (Western) Marsh Harrier
Circus {a. ) aeruginosus, by omission of Y amashina’s (1932)
record of three adult females at Manpo in autumn 1929,
and with Ryukyu Minivet Pericrocotus tegirnae , Water Pipit
Anthus spinoletta blakistoni and Hoary Redpoll Carduelis
homemanniby openly refuting others’ identifications. The
Water Pipit was in fact correctly identified (Fennell 1959);
the original specimens of the others may no longer exist.
All three passerines have been suspected recently to occur
in Korea (Moores and Moores 2003, 2005). Some of
Austin's own sight records in Korea warrant scepticism,
e.g. his run of April sightings of Japanese Cormorants on
the large lake in Suwon, when that species is now known
to be almost exclusively confined to rocky offshore
islands and marine areas (Lethaby and Moores 1999),
and to be back at breeding colonies by March and April
(personal observations), and when he himself (p.35) noted
that Temminck’s and Great Cormorants are ‘easily
confused’.
Secondly, abundances and Korean ranges as assessed
by Austin may also be misleading, e.g. immediately after
Austin referred to Little Heron’s ‘rarity’ in Korea, Wolfe
(1950) and Fennell (1952) assessed it respectively as
‘common in suitable localities’ and a ‘common summer
resident’, from two widely-spaced areas of southern Korea.
Many similar examples could be quoted: the issue
particularly affects species of coastal and marine areas.
Despite a significant loss and degradation of intertidal
habitat in the decades following Austin, later survey efforts
revealed large concentrations of many coastal waders in
Korea (e.g. Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971, Long et al.
1988, Moores 1999a). Austin’s description of estuarine
species such as Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis as ‘a
rare straggler’ and Great Knot Calidris tenuirostris as ‘a
rare transient visitor’ may well simply reflect lack of pre-
1948 coverage of their habitats and the difficulties, then,
of field identification; both are nowadays recorded
regularly, but no actual status change should be inferred
(Moores 2006).
Finally, Austin was often slack in compilation,
transposing records between collecting sites on a given
expedition (e.g. Orii’s Marsh Tit records from Kimhwa
in central Korea [Yamashina 1932] to the far northern
highlands) or between species (e.g. a series of Olive-backed
Pipits entered under ‘Water Pipit A. s. japonicus
Duckworth 2006), assigning localities when none existed
other than ‘Korea’ (e.g. to several specimens in the Hall
collection; Sweet et al. 2007), and listing impossible dates
(e.g. 31 November and 31 April; pp. 198, 206, 271) without
comment. Most such errors were repeated by Tomek
(1999, 2002), who did however expose Austin’s erroneous
transposition of Orii’s Rufous-bellied Woodpecker from
the west coast lowlands to the Paekdu-san massif.
Astonishingly, Austin elsewhere made the sort of
unsupported remarks on Korean bird status that he had
so disparaged in his Korean avifauna. Austin and Kuroda
(1953: 457) stated that a ‘Korean population’ of Marbled
Murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus ‘winters south to
the northern Ryukyus’. Yet Austin (1948) traced but one
Korean record of the species. Neither Fennell and King
(1963) nor Duckworth (2006) could trace the factual
basis of the 1953 statement; there probably was none.
CONCLUSIONS
Fiebig (1995: 96) wrote that ‘A critical checklist for the
whole [Korean] Peninsula is inevitable. In this checklist
the rather generalised statements should be reduced to
really proved ones’. Central to such an endeavour must
be to evaluate pre-1948 records and status independent
of Austin’s publication, by full recourse to written and
surviving specimen sources. Austin’s negative status
assertions must be regarded particularly critically. All the
subsequent major reviews of Korean birds have
erroneously deduced that various species colonised Korea
during the twentieth century, through coupling Austin’s
statements that they did not breed in Korea with recent
evidence that they do. Because Austin’s was the only
English-language summation of Korean birds up to 1 97 1 ,
it has exerted the cultural equivalent of a genetic founder
effect on thinking about Korean bird status. Given the
38
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
patchy past coverage of Korea’s birds, absence of data
does not necessarily suggest, let alone prove, a former
absence of the species. The past status of many Korean
species will have to remain unresolved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Mark Andrews (NHM) for copies of the accessions register
for Anderson’s collection; Teresa Tomek for clarification of some
previous Korean records; Vlad Vysotsky (ZISP) for checking the
Yankovskii collection; Ulf Remahl for translating Bergman’s two 1935
notes; Park Meena and Watabe Yoshiki for discussing certain non-
English sources; Dan Dufffor clarifying large sections of Mauersberger
(1981); Park Jin-Young and Park Jong-Gil for many discussions over
the years about Korean bird status; J. B. Lewis for information on
historical export of Korean hawks; Shim Kyu-Sik, Tim Edelsten, Barry
Heinrich and other colleagues in Birds Korea for information; and the
AMNH, BirdLife International, Dan Duff, the Edward Grey Institute
of Field Ornithology at Oxford University, Jurgen Fiebig, Kim Su-
Kyung, the NHM at Tring, Colin Poole, Michael Rank, Philip Round,
Gerry Schroering, Teresa Tomek, Ted Tizard and the Wildlife
Conservation Society for use of their libraries and/or copies of literature.
Ted Tizard, Colin Poole, Mike Brooke and an anonymous referee
commented on earlier drafts. Ted Tizard prepared the map. JWD’s
visit to NRM received SYNTHESYS support, through the European
Community-Research Infrastructure Action under the FP6 Structuring
the European Research Area Programme ‘SE-taf 1933’.
REFERENCES
Allen, J. A. and Andrews, R. C . (1913) Mammals collected in Korea.
Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 32: 427-463.
Anderson, M. P. (1907) A collecting trip in Korea. Condor 9: 146-147.
Austin, O. L., Jr (1948) The birds of Korea. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.,
Harvard Univ. 101: 1-301. (1972 reprint.)
Austin, O. L., Jr and Kuroda, N. ( 1 953) The birds of Japan, their status
and distribution. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard Univ. 109: 276-
637.
Bergman, S. (1935a) Nagra korta brev fran Korea [A few short letters
from Korea]. Fauna och Flora ‘1935’: 170-172.
Bergman, S. (1935b) Glimtar fram djulivet i en Koreanask floddal
[Glimpses of animal life in a Korean river valley] . Fauna och Flora
T935’: 203-209.
Bergman, S. (1938) In Korean wilds and villages. London: Travel Book
Club.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Brazil, M. A. (1991) The birds of Japan. London: Christopher Helm.
Campbell, C. W. (1892) A list of birds collected in Corea. Ibis (6)4:
230-248.
Cheng Tso-Hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press, and Hamburg and Berlin: Parey.
Choi Hui-Yeong (2004) [First confirmed breeding records on Sorak
Mountain]. [The Birds and People] 15: 28-29. (In Korean.)
Chong Jong-Rvol, Pak U-Il, Rim Chu-Yon and Kim Tok-San
(1996) Breeding biology of Black-faced Spoonbill. Strix 14:
1-10.
Clark, A. H. (1907) Eighteen new species and one new genus of birds
from eastern Asia and the Aleutian islands. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus.
32: 467-475.
Clark, A. H. (1910) Report on a collection of birds made by Pierre
Louis Jouy in Korea. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 38: 147-176.
Clench, M. H. and Hardy, J. W. (1989) Inmemoriam: Oliver L. Austin
Jr. Auk 106: 706-709.
Cramp, S. (Ed.) (1985) The birds of the Western Palearctic vol. IV- terns
to woodpeckers. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Cramp, S. (Ed.) (1992) The birds of the Western Palearctic vol. VI -
warblers. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (Eds) (1977) The birds of the Western
Palearcticvol. I-Ostrichto ducks. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University
Press.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (Eds) (1979) The birds of the Western
Palearctic vol. II - hawks to bustards. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford
University Press.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (Eds) (1982) The birds of the Western
Palearcticvol. III-wadersto gulls. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University
Press.
Crick, H. Q. P. (2004) The impact of climate change on birds. Ibis 146
(suppl. 1): 48-56.
Cumming, D. J. (1933) Notes on Korean birds: with a description of
one hundred of more common ones. Trans. Korea Branch Roy.
Asiatic Soc. 22: 1-94.
Cutright, P. R. (1956) Theodore Roosevelt: the naturalist. New York,
U.S. A.: Harper and Brothers.
Deignan, H. G. (1950) The races of the Collared Scops Owl, Otus
bakkarnoena Pennant. Auk 67: 189-201.
Delacour, J. (1929) On the birds collected during the fourth expedition
to French Indo-china. Ibis (12)5: 193-220, 403-429.
Duckworth, J. W. (2006) Records of some bird species hitherto rarely
found in DPR Korea. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 126: 252-290.
Duckworth, J. W. (2007) Seasonality of the Arctic Warbler Phylloscopus
borealis in northern Korea, with refutation of previous assumptions
of Korean breeding. Ardea 95: 105-1 13.
Duckworth, J. W. and Frisk, G. (in prep.) Sten Bergman’s collection
of Korean birds, 1935-1936.
Fan, F.-T. (2000) Hybrid discourse and textual practice: sinology and
natural history in the nineteenth century. History of Science 38: 25-
56
Fennell, C. M. (1952) Some observations on the birds of southern
Korea. Condor 54: 101-110.
Fennell, C. M. (1957) Pale Ouzel nesting in Korea. Condor 59: 402.
Fennell, C. M. (1959) Erolia temminckii and Anthus spinoletta blakistoni
in Korea. Condor 61: 227-228.
Fennell, C. M. and King, B. F. (1963) Recent records of birds in
Korea. Condor 65: 446-447.
Fiebig, J. (1993) Dreijahrige ornithologische Studien inNordkorea. I.
Allgemeiner Teil und Non-Passeriformes. Mitteilungen aus dem
Zoologischen Museuni in Berlin 69, Supplement: Annalen fur
Omithologie 17: 93-146.
Fiebig, J. (1995) Dreijahrige ornithologische Studien in Nordkorea
Nachtrage zum I. Teil (Non-Passeres) und II. Teil Passeriformes.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 7 1 , Supplement:
Annalen fur Omithologie 19: 43-99.
Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B. and Chapman, R. A. (1993) The new atlas
of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1 988-1 991 . London: T. and
A. D. Poyser.
Giglioh, H. H. and Salvadori, T. (1887) Brief notes on the fauna of
Corea and the adjoining coast of Manchuria. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.
T887’: 580-596.
Gore, M. E. J. and Won, Pyong-Oh (1971) Birds of Korea. Seoul: Royal
Asiatic Society Korea Branch.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Kawakami, K. and Higuchi, H. (2003) Population trend and estimation
of three threatened bird species in Japanese rural forests: the Japanese
Night Heron Gorsachius goisagi. Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
39
Grey-faced Buzzard Butastur indicus. J. Yamashina Inst. Ornithol.
35: 19-29.
Kuroda, N. ( 1 9 1 8) Notes on Corean and Manchurian birds. Annotationes
Zoologicae Japonensis 9(4): 495-573.
Lee Jong-Nam, Hoe Ui-Yeong and Woo Yong-Tae (1999) Zitting
Cisticola ( Cisticola jundicis). a study of its distribution and ecology.
Korean Ornithol. J. 7(1): 14-17.
Lethaby, N. and Moores, N. (1999) Identification of Temminck’s
Cormorant. Dutch Birding 21: 1-8.
Lewis, J. B. (2003) Frontier contact between Choson Korea and Tokugawa
Japan. London: Routledge Curzon Press.
Long, A. J., Poole, C. M., Eldridge, M. I., Won, P.-O. and Lee, K.-S.
(1988) A survey of coastal wetlands and shorebirds in South Korea,
spring 1988. Kuala Lumpur: Asian Wetland Bureau.
Macfarlane, A. M. (1963) Field notes on the birds of Korea. Ibis 105:
319-326.
Mauersberger, G. (1981) Anmerkungen zur Avifauna Nordkoreas.
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 57, Supplement:
Annalen fiir Omithologie 5: 15-62.
[MKN and KUT] Museum of Korean Nature and Korea University in
Tokyo (1987) Endangered bird species in the Korean Peninsula. Tokyo:
Wild Bird Society of Japan.
Mikhailov, K. E. and Shibnev, Y. B. (1998) The threatened and near-
threatened birds of northern Ussuriland, south-east Russia, and the
role of the Bikin river basin in their conservation. BirdConserv. Intemat.
8: 141-171.
Moores, N. (1999a) A survey of the distribution and abundance of
shorebirds in South Korea during 1998-1999: interim summary.
Stilt 34: 18-29.
Moores, N. (1999b) Woopo wetland: a preliminary investigation-with
relevance to existing and future development. Pp. 61-78 in Anon,
eds. The ecological values and management of the Woopo wetlands as a
Ramsar Site. Proceedings of International Symposium, Feb. 27-Mar. 1,
1 999. Committee for the Establishment of a Natural History Museum
at Upo.
Moores, N. (2006) South Korea’s shorebirds: a review of abundance,
distribution, threats and conservation status. Stilt 50: 62-72.
Moores, N. (2007) Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea.
Forktail 23: 102-124.
Moores, C. and Moores, N. (2002) Birds of South Korea. Charlie Moores
Video Productions and Nial Moores (170 minute videocassette).
Moores, N. and Moores, C. (2003) The Birds Korea Network 2003
Birding Year Review. Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/
yearreview2003.asp (accessed 31 December 2006).
Moores, N. and Moores, C. (2004) A presumed Steppe Grey Shrike
(Lanius pallidirostris) on Socheong island, S Korea. Biological Lett.
41: 163-166.
Moores, N. and Moores, C. (2005) The Birds Korea Bird Review 2005.
Available at: http://www.birdskorea.org/2005review.asp (accessed
31 December 2006).
Neff, D. J. (1956) Birds of Yang-do, Korea. Auk 73: 551 555.
Ornithological Society of Japan (1922) Hand-list of Japanese birds [1st
edition]. Tokyo: Ornithological Society of Japan.
Ornithological Society of Japan ( 1 932) Hand-list of Japanese birds, 2nd
edition. Tokyo: Ornithological Society of Japan.
Ornithological Society of Japan (1942) Hand-list of Japanese birds, 3rd
edition. Tokyo: Ornithological Society of Japan.
Park Jin-Young (2002) [Current status and distribution of birds in Korea.}
Seoul: Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University (unpublished
thesis). (In Korean.)
Park Young-Han, Lee Ki-Suk, Lee Hee-Yul, Ill Son, Lee Jeong-Rock
(2000) Atlas of Korea. Seoul: Sung Ji Mun Hwa.
Prentice, D. S. (1952) Bird observations in Korea. The Passenger Pigeon
14(4): 137-141.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Prys-Jones, R. P. (2003) History vs mystery: the
reliability of museum specimen data. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 123A:
66-94.
Sampson, T. ( 1 984) Botanical and other writings on China, 1867-1870 ,
H. Walravens and E. Bretschneider, eds. Hamburg, Germany: C.
Bell.
Sowerby, A. deC. (1923) The naturalist in Manchuria vol. 1, Travel and
exploration, and vol. 3, Birds. Tientsin, China: Tientsin Press.
Sweet, P. R, Duckworth, J. W., Trombone, T. J. and Robin, L. (2007)
The Hall collection of birds from Wonsan, central Korea, in spring
1903. Forktail 23: 129-134.
Taczanowski, L. (1887) Liste des oiseaux recueillis en Coree par M.
Jean Kalinowski. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. ‘1887’: 596-611.
T aczanowski, L. (1888) Liste supplemental des oiseaux recueillis en
Coree par M. Jean Kalinowski. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. ‘1888’: 450-
468.
Tomek, T. (1984) Materials to the breeding avifauna of the People’s
Democratic Republic of Korea. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 27: 19-
46.
T omek, T. ( 1 999) The birds of North Korea. Non-Passeriformes. Acta
Zoologica Cracoviensia 42: 1-217.
Tomek, T. (2002) The birds of North Korea. Passeriformes. Acta
Zoologica Cracoviensia 45: 1-235.
Vaurie, C. (1959) The birds of the Palearctic fauna, a systematic reference.
Order Passeriformes. London: H. F. and G. Witherby.
Vaurie, C. (1965) The birds of the Palearctic fauna, a systematic reference.
Non-Passeriformes. London: H. F. and G. Witherby.
Wetlands International (2006) Waterbird population estimates, fourth
edition. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wetlands International.
Wolfe, L. R. (1950) Notes on the birds of Korea. Auk 67: 433-455.
Won HongKoo (1963-1965) [The birds of Korea] vols 1-3. Pyongyang:
Science Institute Publishing House. (In Korean.)
Won Pyong-Oh (1961) Studies on the avi-mammalian fauna of Korea
from the viewpoint of the forestry protection. Pp. 31-135 in Institute
of Agriculture, ed. Avi-mammalian fauna of Korea. Suwon, Korea:
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
Won Pyong-Oh (1996) Checklist of the birds of Korea. Bull. Korea Inst.
Ornithol. 5(1): 39-58.
Yamashina, Y. (1932) On the specimens of Korean birds collected by
Mr. Hyojiro Orii. Tori 7(33-34): 213-252.
Yamashina, Y. (1933) A natural history of Japanese birds, vol. I. Tokyo:
Azusa-shobo.
Yamashina, Y. (1941)H natural history of Japanese birds, vol. II. Tokyo:
Azusa-shobo.
Yankovskii, A. (1898). [Ornithological diary from 7 May till 3 November
1897 with remarks about butterflies. Expedition of the Imperial
Russian Geographical Society to Korea and Manchuria, directed
by V. L. Komarov, in 1897] . [Notes of the Amur Branch of the Imperial
Russian Geographical Society] 3(3): 111-156. (In Russian. Not seen;
cited and quoted extensively in Tomek 1999, 2002.)
J. W. Duckworth, Wildlife Conservation Society, Pyongyang, DPR Korea; present address: PO Box 5573, Vientiane, Lao
PDR. Email: willduckworthdprk@yahoo.com
N. Moores, Birds Korea, 1009 Ho, 3 Dong, Samik Tower Apartment, Namcheon 2 Dong, Su-Young Gu, Busan 613762,
Republic of Korea. Email: spoonbiIlkorea@yahoo. com
40 J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
41
Species
Hodgson’s Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx fugax
Indian Cuckoo Cuculus micropterus
Eurasian Cuckoo C. canorus
Oriental Cuckoo C. saturatus
Lesser Cuckoo C. poliocephalus
White-throated Needletail Hirundapus caudacutus
Fork-tailed Swift Apus padficus
Oriental Scops Owl Otus sunia
Collared Scops Owl O. bakkamoena
Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo
Tawny Owl Strix aluco
Ural Owl S. umlensis
Northern Hawk Owl Sumia ulula
Little Owl Athene noctua
Brown Hawk Owl Ninox scutulata
Long-eared Owl Asio otus
Grey Nightjar Caprimulgus indicus
Rock Pigeon Columba livia
Hill Pigeon C. mpestris
Japanese Wood Pigeon C. janthina
Oriental Turtle Dove Streptopelia orientalis
Eurasian Collared Dove S. decaocto
SWINHOE’S CRAKE Cotumicops exquisitus
BAILLON’S CRAKE Porzana pusilla
Ruddy-breasted Crake P. fusca
Band-bellied Crake P. paykullii
WATERCOCK Gallicrex cinerea
Common Coot Fulica atra
Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata
COMMON GREENSHANK Tringa nebularia
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis
Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus
Long-billed Plover Charadrius placidus
Little Ringed Plover C. dubius
Kentish Plover C. alexandrinus
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus
Oriental Pratincole Glareola maldivarum
Black-tailed Gull Lams crassirostris
Yellow-legged Gull L. cachinnans
Category number
X*
X
X
X**
X**
x+*
X
X**
X**
X
X
X**
X
X**
X
X**
X
X4
X
X
X
XI
X
x**
X
X**
X
X
X
X
X
X*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X5
X
X3
42
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Category number
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
43
Category number
44
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Category number
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
45
Category number
The appendix (with notes to Category 5) includes all species with internationally published pre-2003 records suggestive of breeding in Korea ( sensu
Austin 1948). Care is needed in extracting statements of Korean breeding from sources (particularly Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971) where
information might refer only to Cheju and Ullung islands, areas excluded from Austin’s (1948) and the present review.
46
J. W. DUCKWORTH and N. MOORES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Category number definitions:
1 . Species accepted unequivocally by Austin as breeding in Korea,
including those summer residents for which Austin neither gave evidence
confirming breeding nor explicitly questioned that they bred.
1 There seems to be no subsequent strong published evidence for
Korean breeding by Eurasian Collared Dove, Steller’s Sea Eagle,
Russet Sparrow, Elawfmch or Yellow-breasted Bunting, and their
historical status may warrant further review.
2. Species for which Austin was cautious of extrapolating from
undoubted Korean summer residency to breeding. All species do indeed
breed in Korea (Tomek 1999, 2002, Park Jin-Young 2002).
3. Species for which Austin was explicitly open-minded about Korean
breeding status, which are proven or very likely Korean breeders (T omek
1999, 2002, Park Jin-Young 2002).
* Austin quoted but dismissed or queried previous evidence or opinion
(** by Won Hong Koo) of Korean breeding.
1 Recently proven to breed in central Korea (Moores and Moores
2004).
4. Species assigned by Austin as only non-breeders in Korea, but
(near-) contemporary evidence shows that they bred or over-summered
(see species accounts).
* Austin quoted but dismissed or queried previous evidence or opinion
(** by Won Hong Koo) of Korean breeding.
5 . Species known or strongly suspected to breed in Korea which Austin
classified as not breeding in Korea, which apparently lack strong pre-
1970s breeding-related data or opinions, but for which there are no
grounds to invoke post-1948 colonisation. Breeding evidence, except
where footnoted, is based on detail in Gore and Won Pyong-Oh (1971),
Tomek (1999, 2002), and Parkjin-Young (2002). Historical breeding-
season records, often from the 1 9 5 0s or even pre- 1 948, imply that most
species were overlooked previously, but the evidence is too weak for
listing in Category 4. Of the species without historical breeding-season
records. Scaly-sided Merganser and Greater Painted-snipe are readily
overlooked and Japanese Murrelet and Pelagic Cormorant apparently
breed in Korea only on small islands. Brown-headed Thrush, Richard’s
Pipit Anthus richardi and Japanese Grosbeak Eophona personata,
suspected by Tomek (2002) to breed in Korea, and which might indeed
do so, are excluded because they lack specific information genuinely
suggestive of Korean breeding (Duckworth 2006). The various other
species for which distribution in neighbouring countries suggests the
possibility of Korean breeding are also not listed here. Ten species not
listed here (with breeding evidence in Gore and Won Pyong-Oh 1971,
Lee Jong-Nam et al. 1999, Tomek 1999, 2002, Parkjin-Young 2002,
Moores 2007) seem to be post-1 948 colonists of Korea: White-breasted
Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus. Common Moorhen Gallinula
chloropus , Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus , Little Egret Egretta
garzetta, Catde Egret Bubulcus ibis, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus.
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax , Eurasian Blackbird
Turdus merula. Light-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis and Zitting
Cisticola Cisticola juncidis. All of these are visually and/or vocally
conspicuous and inhabit urban and/or agricultural habitats, so are not
readily overlooked, yet no historical records indicate breeding. Note
that a Korean breeding record of Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus
chirurgus in Moores (2006) comes from Cheju island, outside the present
review’s geographical scope; breeding was also attempted at three
different southern mainland sites in 2007 (Birds Korea data).
1 Although multiple records indicate summer residence, evidence of
nesting in Korea is inconclusive. All other species are proven, or
reasonably assumed, to be breeding in Korea.
2 A likely Korean breeder (Tomek 1999), with almost conclusive
evidence of Korean breeding in MKN and KUT (1987: 44-47).
3 Adjudged (as ‘ L . argentatus'") in need of confirmation as a Korean
breeder by T omek (1999), despite multiple breeding-season records,
including several from before 1948, and explicit statements ofbreeding
by Won and various others. Large white-headed gulls were recently
confirmed breeding by Chong Jong-Ryol era/. (1996); also, NMhas
been shown video footage and still photographs of breeding birds
(adult plumage, for which species identification is challenging) from
one or more Korean West Sea islands, and has seen breeding birds
in Incheon (in 2008). These are attributed to L. c. mongoiicus by
Wetlands International (2006), the taxon which appears (including
many fresh juveniles, for which identification is relatively
straightforward) along the mainland west coast from July onwards
(personal observations).
4 Breeding was proven at Taegukul Island, near Gageo Island, in the
early 1980s (Park Jin-Young 2002).
5 Breeds on Paengnyong Island (Park Jin-Young 2002) and elsewhere
in the West Sea (e.g. on Socheong Island [37°45'N 124°44'E] at least
in 2006-2007: personal observations).
6 Adjudged an unlikely breeder in Korea by T omek (2002), but present
throughout summers 2002-2003 in the high-altitude spruce forests
of the Myohyang mountains, the site of earlier midsummer records;
the through-summer presence of many birds make breeding a safe
assumption (personal observations).
6. Species for which Austin was explicitly open-minded concerning
Korean breeding status, and for which it remains unclear whether they
breed in Korea.
* Austin quoted but dismissed or queried previous evidence or opinion
(** by Won Hong Koo) of Korean breeding.
1 T omek (1999) considered breeding in Korea to be probable but gave
no evidence other than opinion and two dates, one of which, at 21
April, could be of a passage bird. More solid evidence than the
remaining single date (8 July 1897) is desirable.
2 Tomek (2002) concluded that the species bred in Korea but gave no
evidence other than dates; these are not even weakly indicative of
Korean breeding, and no additional relevant evidence can be traced
(Duckworth and Frisk in prep.).
3 T omek (2002) considered breeding in northern Korea to be probable,
but gave only opinion and a single date which, at 19 June, is not
unduly late for passage for this species.
4 Published statements ofbreeding lack supporting data and may well
be in error (Duckworth 2007).
7 . Species rejected (explicitly or implicitly) by Austin as Korean breeders,
for which true summer status in Korea remains unresolved, even though
there were summer records or opinion of breeding during or shortly
after Austin’s review period (Austin 1948, Tomek 1999, 2002, Park
Jin-Y oung 2002) . The records are sufficiently few that they might simply
involve occasional over-summering non-breeders, early or late migrant
individuals, or data errors (see Tomek 1999: 3, 108; 2002: 135), but
breeding status in neighbouring countries suggests Korean breeding is
possible for most species. Swan Goose, Common Greenshank, Merlin,
Saker, Dusky Thrush, Siberian Accentor, Rustic Bunting and Chestnut
Bunting seem, based on known breeding ranges (e.g. Vaurie 1959,
1965, Cheng 1987), fairly unlikely to breed in Korea. Species in which
non-breeding individuals habitually over-summer well outside the
breeding range are not included in this table, if they have only 1-2
breeding-season Korean records.
* Austin quoted but dismissed or queried previous evidence or opinion
(** by Won Hong Koo) of Korean breeding.
1 BirdLife International (200 1:367) gave secondary citation to potential
breeding in Korea.
2 See Kuroda (1918); Austin used this source, but did not incorporate
the second-hand indication of breeding-season presence.
Forktail 24 (2008)
A re-evaluation of the pre-1948 Korean breeding avifauna
47
8. Species not stated by Austin or any of his sources to breed in Korea,
with no historical breeding-season records, and with subsequent records
inconclusive of established breeding in Korea. Data from outside Austin
(1948), Tomek (1999, 2002), Park Jin-Young (2002) are specifically
noted to source.
1 Moores (1999b) raised the possibility of Korean breeding.
2 The species breeds in central Korea at least intermittently: in the late
1990s, NM was shown photographs of adults with ducklings, and
there are recent records of breeding in Kangwon province (per B.
Heinrich in litt. 2008). It is unclear whether it breeds regularly, and
if so, whether it is a historically overlooked breeder, or a recent
colonist: construction of reservoirs and replanting of forests has
created suitable habitat, and the species has greatly expanded its
southerly breeding distribution at the western edge of its Eurasian
range (Gibbons et al. 1993).
3 Despite none being from the breeding season, the Korean records
(all from pre-1950) seem as likely to reflect local dispersal from
Korean breeding areas as winter immigration from elsewhere.
4 Free-flying birds are now common in parts of Korea (both northern
and southern), with truly feral populations (not just free-ranging
domestic birds) widespread in the southern (but not the northern)
provinces (personal observations). It is unclear whether the paucity
of specific mention in the published record reflects lack of birds or
lack of interest.
5 Moores (2006) referred to an instance of likely breeding in 2004 near
to Seosan city.
6 Proven to breed in the southern provinces in 1996 (Park Jin-Young
2002) and in e.g. 2007 (when 1 2 adults had four separate broods in
June on Wasong Reservoir, Uiwang, Kyonggi province: T. Edelsten
verbally 2008); possibly an overlooked historical breeder (Category
6), but the known breeding sites are artificially modified wetlands.
Twentieth-century habitat engineering and Palaearctic grebes’
propensity to breed sporadically outside their range (e.g. Gibbons
et al. 1993) suggests it may be a recent colonist or merely sporadic
breeder.
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 48-56
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu
island, central Philippines
LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM
Information on threatened endemic birds of Cebu, generated over three years of monitoring (2001-2004), revealed a number of
supposedly extinct bird taxa surviving in small, degraded forest patches. Methods used in our surveys included mist-netting, line transects,
point counts and interviewing key local persons. Four threatened Philippine endemic birds were observed in at least two sites on Cebu
Island. Seven of the twelve endemic subspecies from Cebu were confirmed extant. Twenty forest birds presumed extinct in Cebu were
rediscovered. In addition, we mist-netted the first Chinese Goshawk for Cebu and one Phylloscopus warbler showing characteristics of
Yellow-browed Warbler, a species not previously known from the Philippines. On the other hand, we did not find the Cebu endemic races
of White-bellied Woodpecker Dryocopus javensis cebuensis, Blackish Cuckooshrike Coracina coerulescens altera , Bar-bellied Cuckooshrike
Coracina striata cebuensis and Philippine Oriole Oriolus steeri assimilis along with 1 6 other forest bird species that may now be extinct or
nearly extinct on Cebu. The surviving populations of threatened and endemic birds of Cebu largely depend on the persistence of small
forest patches; hence, the condition of these populations is precarious.
INTRODUCTION
The island of Cebu, located in Central Visayas, is
considered as the most denuded island in the central
Philippines (Collar etal. 1999). Despite its close proximity
to Negros, Siquijor and Bohol, its avifauna is distinct
from these islands. There are two bird species and twelve
subspecies endemic to the island, making Cebu one of
the nine Endemic Bird Areas in the Philippines (Collar et
al. 1999, Mallari et al. 2001).
The forest cover of Cebu Island is now less than 1 %
of its total land area (Mallari et al. 2001). The almost
complete deforestation of Cebu Island has apparently led
to the extinction of many birds and other wildlife (Brooks
et al. 1995). Several forest species recorded in the late
1950s are now considered locally extinct (Rabor 1959,
Magsalay et al. 1995, Brooks et. al. 1995, Collar et. al.
1999). However, the recent increase in ornithological
fieldwork in Cebu has resulted in the rediscovery of several
species of supposedly extinct taxa such as Everett’s White-
eye Zosterops everetti everetti and White-vented Whistler
Pachycephala homeyeri major (Dutson 1993, Magsalay
1994, Brooks et al. 1995). In this paper, we describe the
condition of three remaining forest patches and the status
of endemic and threatened forest birds of Cebu that are
found in these patches. We also compare the number of
threatened species between sites.
Historical review of ornithological work in Cebu
There have been only a few bird studies conducted in
Cebu, almost all of which focused on collecting birds and
very few on the relationship of species (particularly the
endemics) to their habitat (Timmins 1 992, Dutson et al.
1993, Brooks et al. 1995, Magsalay etal. 1995).
Meyer collected birds in April 1872, followed by the
Challenger expedition in April 1875. Steere conducted
his expedition from May 1874 to April 1875, visiting
different islands in the Philippines including Cebu. Everett
followed in March-April 1877, making collections for
Lord Tweeddale. Koch visited Cebu in March 1881
followed by Steere in 1888. The Menage Expedition
conducted their study in June 1891 and June-July the
following year. McGregor made collections in September
1906 followed by Forbes in June 1913 and Celestino in
late 1920. In the late 1940s, Rabor began collecting for
20 years (Dickinson etal. 1991). Timmins (1992) visited
T abunan in early 1990s and first reported the presence of
the supposedly extinct Cebu Flowerpecker Dicaeum
quadricolor. This was confirmed by Dutson et al. (1993).
Shortly after, Magsalay (1993) published a paper on the
rediscovery of four endemic subspecies of birds in
Cebu. Papers by Brooks et al. (1995) and Magsalay et al.
(1995) discussed extinctions and rediscoveries in
Cebu. This was followed by an island-wide survey and a
report on the conservation status of the forests in
Cebu and its threatened wildlife in 1998 (Gonzalez et al.
1999). Extensive mist-netting of birds was conducted in
Alcoy in March 2000 by Marisol dG. Pedregosa
(Pedregosa, 2000). Many results of these latter two
unpublished surveys are included here with permission
of the authors.
STUDY AREA
The island of Cebu is the ninth largest in the Philippine
archipelago. It has a land area of 5,008 km2, with a
hilly landscape (Orlanes 2002). It is a long, narrow
island with a low central mountainous ridge running
parallel to the coast in a north-south direction. Mount
Calbalasan in the south, which rises to 1,018 m in
elevation, is the highest point on the island. There are
seven forest patches distributed across the island; we
surveyed three.
Tabunan Forest (10°26T7"N 123°49,34,,E)
Tabunan holds the most significant forest cover within
Central Cebu Protected Landscape (Gonzalez etal. 1998,
Orlanes 2002). It is the only remaining closed-canopy
forest in Central Cebu, with large trees over 25 m tall
covering an area of at least 1.85 km2 (Orlanes 2002). It
forms a thin, segmented strip of forest on steep limestone
hillside, with closed-canopy areas of less than 0.1 km2.
The vegetation is dominated by Ficus spp., Homolanthus
sp., Syzygium sp., Macaranga sp., Leeia sp., Sterculia
philippinensis, Dillenia sp., Leucosyke sp., Diospyros
pliilippensis and Mangifera sp. The elevation ranges from
400 to 880 m. The gradient changes drastically from a
gentle 1 1-34% at the interface between the forest and
abandoned farmlands to over 40-50% at the forest edge
Forktail 24 (2008)
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu island
49
(Orlanes 2002) . Active and abandoned farmland is found
within the forest perimeter and in the middle of the
forest, these are gradually splitting the forest into two
main blocks.
Mt Lantoy, Argao (9°71'30"N 123°45'3"E)
Mt Lantoy is part of the Argao-Dalaguete Watershed
Forest Reserve declared by a Presidential Proclamation
(No. 414, 29 June 1994). The watershed area totals to
72.5 km2 but less than 0.5 km2 of Mt Lantoy is covered
with natural vegetation. The forest in Mt Lantoy is
surrounded by cultivation, coconut plantations,
plantations of non-indigenous trees and scrubland,
which is also used by local communities for grazing their
livestock. Seasonal crops like cabbage, corn, onion and
carrots are planted in agricultural farms surrounding the
forests.
Alcoy Forest (9°71'N 123°44'E)
The natural limestone forest in Alcoy covers 12 km2. It is
located in the central portion of the municipality of
Alcoy and Boljo-on. It covers five barangays (villages),
namely Nug-as, Atabay, San Agustin, Poblacion and
Nangka. The natural limestone forest is mostly
composed of secondary forest dominated by Syzygium
and Ficus spp., and is surrounded by tree plantations,
scrubland and agriculture. Casuarina rumphiana and
Cinnamomum sp. are distributed in clumps with Melia
dubia , Macaranga sp. and Melastoma sp. forming a dense
undergrowth. The forest is thick with climbing bamboo,
rattan ( Calamus sp.) and spiny vines. The substrate is
basically limestone and closed-canopy forest is only
observed in gullies while ridge tops have smaller trees.
Notable indigenous plants include Palaquim philippense,
Canarium sp., Helicia sp., Eugenia sp., Syzygium sp. and
Ficus spp. Rare plants noted were Medinilla albiflora,
various epiphytic ferns (e.g. Asplenium, Platy cerium) and
orchids.
Among the three forest patches studied, Nug-as has the
largest total forest cover (12 km2) followed by Tabunan
(1.85 km2) and Mt Lantoy in Argao (0.5 km2). Nug-as
forest also appears to be the least disturbed followed by
Tabunan and Mt Lantoy.
METHODS
We carried out fieldwork between 2001 and 2004. The
forest patches in T abunan were visited from 27 February
2001 to 2 March 200 1 and during 7-10 November 2002.
Alcoy forest was visited during 16-19 November 2002,
22-27 January 2003, 18-22 March 2003, 22-26 March
2004 and 10-13 November 2004. Mt Lantoy in Argao
was visited on 8-13 October 2004. We conducted bird
observations at designated point count areas at Mt Lantoy
and Tabunan forests, including the surrounding smaller
forest patches. In each station, observers waited for at
least two minutes after arriving and then recorded birds
within a 20 m radius for six minutes. Each station was
placed at least 200 m apart. Observations were carried
out from 06h00 to 08h00 and from 16h00 to 18h00. Six
point-count stations were established in the forest patches
of Tabunan, and a total of 9 hours and 6 minutes of
observation time was spent there. In Mt Lantoy, there
were three point-count stations, and total observation
time was 3 hours and 6 minutes.
In Alcoy where the forest cover was larger, six 1-km
transects were laid. Transects followed established routes
inside the forests and were at least 200 m apart. All
transects were walked simultaneously and birds seen or
heard calling within a 20 m belt on either side of the
transect were recorded. Observations were conducted
during 06h00-08h00 and 16h30-18h00. A total of 228
observation hours was spent in the area. Mist-nets
measuring 6x4 m (height x length) were also used in Argao
and Alcoy forests to record birds that cannot easily be
seen or heard. Nets were opened during 05h00-18h00
and were checked every hour for captured birds. Nets
were closed only at night and during heavy rain. Details
of mist-netting effort at each site are shown in Table 1.
Birds were identified using the Kennedy et al. (200 1 ),
whose taxonomy and nomenclature we follow, except for
some species (Variable Kingfisher Ceyx lepidus, Sulphur¬
billed Nuthatch Sitta oenoclamys and Red-striped
Flowerpecker Dicaeum australe ) where we follow the
English names in Howard and Moore (2003). Scientific
names of bird taxa are listed in Table 2. Square brackets
indicate uncertain identification. Threatened status
follows BirdLife International (2008).
Table 1. Sampling effort at each survey site on Cebu Island, Philippines.
4,320
50
LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM Forktail 24 (2008)
RESULTS
We found different numbers of species in the three forest
patches surveyed — 58 in Alcoy, 53 in Tabunan and 44 in
Argao. Among these were several species of interest
because of their endemism or threatened status or both.
Threatened Philippine endemic species
This study confirmed the presence of several threatened
endemic birds in Alcoy and Mt Lantoy, thus extending
their local distribution from Tabunan to at least these
two forest patches. The Black Shama and Streak-breasted
Bulbul were observed in all three sampling sites while the
Cebu Flowerpecker and the Green-faced Parrotfinch were
recorded only in Tabunan and Nug-as (Alcoy) forests.
The Nug-as forest supported the highest number of
threatened species followed by Tabunan, then Mt Lantoy.
The Rufous-lored Kingfisher was not observed in
Tabunan but a single sighting of a cobalt blue kingfisher
with a reddish mark on the collar was made in Nug-as.
Cebu Flowerpecker Dicaeum quadricolor
Critically Endangered. This species was encountered six
times in Tabunan forests, usually between llhOO and
13h00. On one occasion (November 2002, 13h00), two
male birds and one female were observed feeding in a
Ficus tree at a forest edge for at least five minutes. The
forest patch was located northwest of the main Tabunan
forest at 780 m elevation. A male bird was again seen
gleaning insects and feeding on Ficus fruits in February
2003. In Nug-as forests, the species was observed on
several occasions in different locations. In July 2003, a
pair was observed feeding on Loranthus fruit in an
abandoned farm beside the forest at 700 m elevation.
Another male was observed gleaning insects from under
the leaves of a Macaranga tree in April 2004. This bird
stayed for about 10 seconds before moving away from
sight. We observed the bird moving silently and rarely
giving calls. On 1 1 July 2004, a male was seen feeding on
the fruits of a Loranthus plant in a forest edge at 860 m
elevation. In November 2004, another male was observed
for at least five minutes, feeding on Loranthus fruits 6 m
away at 670 m elevation.
Streak-breasted Bulbul Ixos siquijorensis
Endangered. This species was usually encountered singly
or in pairs, feeding on Ficus fruits together with Philippine
Bulbul, Coppersmith Barbet and White-eared Brown
Dove in Nug-as forest. Two individuals were also observed
in Mt Lantoy, while the bird appears uncommon in
Tabunan forest. The birds were slightly larger than
Philippine Bulbul, with a white chin and light brown
throat streaked with white, extending to the belly region.
The lower belly was white and rump was pale yellow. The
crown was greyish-brown. This species was seen only in
areas with natural vegetation although some observations
were at forest edges.
GREEN-FACED PARROTFINCH Erythrura viridifacies
Vulnerable. This species was first recorded in Alcoy forest
in March 2000 (Pedregosa 2000) when two individuals
were mist-netted in the subcanopy. During our study, a
single individual was sighted in June 2001, perched on a
4 m tall mahogany tree Szveetenia macrophylla. The area
was surrounded by Imperata cylindrica grass and second-
growth plants were observed near edges of Acacia mangium
plantations. The general body coloration was
characteristically green with distinctive red elongated
central tail feathers, red rump and uppertail coverts. We
observed the bird for at least 10 seconds before it flew
towards the grassland. The bird was also sighted in Alcoy
forest in June 2004, where a single individual was seen
perched on a low lying bush surrounded by Imperata and
then flew in the direction of the forest. Another individual
was sighted in January 2004 when it flew across the trail
in an abandoned agricultural area next to a secondary
forest; it perched on the branches of a small tree before
disappearing into the bushes. This species has previously
been recorded only from Negros and Panay and Luzon
islands (Kennedy et al. 2001) and this is the first record
of the species in Cebu.
Endemic subspecies
Both Tabunan and Nug-as forests yielded eight endemic
subspecies. Seven of the 12 endemic subspecies of birds
in Cebu were considered possibly extinct by Brooks etal.
(1995). These are White-bellied Woodpecker, Philippine
Oriole, Orange-bellied Flowerpecker, Amethyst Brown
Dove, Blackish Cuckooshrike, Bar-bellied Cuckooshrike
and Streak-breasted Bulbul. Our study recorded two of
these seven supposedly extinct endemic subspecies —
Amethyst Brown Dove and Orange-bellied
Flowerpecker — as well as other subspecies.
Amethyst Brown Dove Phapitreron amethystina frontalis
This subspecies was thought to be extinct on Cebu (Brooks
etal. 1 995). Two possible individuals of Amethyst Brown
Dove were observed in Alcoy forest in November 2004.
One individual was seen perched on an exposed branch
of a sub-canopy tree along a forest trail in Alcoy. It was
perched upright, and had a distinctive grayish band on
the undertail, an iridescent pink and purple neck and
upper back, and a dark line under the eye contrasting
with the buff line under it. The legs were purplish-red.
The other individual was observed at least 700 m away
from the location of the first; it was perched on a woody
vine for at least a minute before moving out of sight.
Further confirmation of the identification of this
subspecies is needed.
[COLASISI Loriculus philippensis chrysonotus \
This taxon was historically recorded in Tabunan forests
but recent sightings have not been able to confirm the
identification of the chrysonotus subspecies. We have
observed a Colasisi in Tabunan forest, perched on a rattan
Calamus leaf. It had a light yellow colour from the top of
the head up to the back region. The chrysonotus subspecies
has orange coloration on the back rather than yellow.
Brooks etal. (1995) mention escaped caged Colasisi birds
in Tabunan, and the bird we observed in the area may
actually be an escapee and not the chrysonotus subspecies.
A Colasisi fitting the description of the chrysonotus
subspecies was reported by locals in Nug-as in August
2004 but this has not been verified.
COPPERSMITH Barbet Megalaima haemacephala cebuensis
This barbet was observed in all three sites. The bird was
common-to-uncommon in all three sites and usually
perched on exposed branches of canopy trees from which
it was seen to call. The species also congregated in fruiting
Forktail 24 (2008)
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu island
51
Table 2. Comparison of records of resident forest birds of Cebu recorded in this study (2001-2004), with those recorded in earlier studies (based
on Kennedy et al. 2000). The 1957 records are taken from Rabor (1959); the 1992 records from Brooks et al. (1995); the 1998 records from
Gonzalez et al. (1999); and the 2000 records from Pedregosa (2000). New records, including those from Pedregosa (2000), are marked with an
asterisk. Question marks indicate unconfirmed records.
52 LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM Forktail 24 (2008)
Note: Threat categories for globally threatened species are provided in parenthesis following BirdLife International (2008): VU-Vulnerable,
EN=Endangered, CR=Critically Endangered.
Ficus trees to feed on ripe fruits, often accompanied by
Streak-breasted Bulbul, Philippine Bulbul, White-eared
Brown Dove, Black-chinned fruit dove and Pmk-necked
Green Pigeon. One individual was caught in a mist-net in
November 2004 in Alcoy forest.
ELEGANT Tit Parus elegans visayanus
Elegant Tit was also observed in all three sites, following
mixed-species flocks or moving in small groups of 3-4
individuals. Two juveniles were observed following their
parents feeding in the forest understorey and sub-canopy
in June 2004 in Alcoy forest. The juveniles made constant
begging calls and the parents fed them occasionally, while
moving along the foliage. One juvenile was caught in a
mist-net set at the forest edge in August 2004 in Alcoy
forest.
WHITE-BELLIED WHISTLER Pachycephala homeyeri major
This subspecies was also observed in all three forest
patches. It was observed feeding in the understorey and
in sub-canopy trees, gleaning and flycatching for insects
among vines and leaves, in both Alcoy and Tabunan.
One individual was caught in a mist-net in Alcoy in 2003.
Orange-bellied Flowerpecker
Dicaeum trigono stigma pallidas
The taxon was first reported by a birdwatcher in Tabunan
forest in 2000. We saw a male and female on February
2003 in one of the trees in the understorey in Tabunan.
The male was silently feeding on a berry-like fruit and
then moved out of sight. The female stayed for about one
minute before flying away. The bird was rare in second
growth and forest edges in Nug-as forest except when
Forktail 24 (2008)
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu island
53
Loranthus plant was present. The bird was usually observed
in mixed-species flocks with Crimson Sunbird, Lovely
Sunbird Red-striped Flowerpecker, Pygmy Flowerpecker
and Olive-backed Sunbird.
Everett’s White-eye Zostemps everetti everetti
Everett’s White-eye was also recorded in all three sites. It
was usually observed feeding in small groups of 4-6
individuals, gleaning for insects in shrubs and small trees
in forest edges, or participating in mixed-species flocks in
the forest interior. Four individuals mist-netted on four
separate occasions in Alcoy forest.
Despite systematic searches for the remaining four
endemic subspecies of birds — White-bellied Woodpecker,
Philippine Oriole, Blackish Cuckooshrike and Bar-bellied
Cuckooshrike — these birds were not observed in any of
the three forests covered during our survey.
Rediscoveries
Several species thought to be extinct from Cebu were
found either during our survey, or during the surveys of
Gonzales et al. (1999) or Pedregosa (2000).
Red Junglefowl G alius gallus
This species was presumed extinct (Brooks et al. 1995)
but was reported by local communities in Nug-as in 1 998
(Gonzales et al. 1999) and 2000 (Pedregosa 2000). We
have observed five males and three females (two of which
were accompanied by 4-6 chicks) in Alcoy forest on August
2004, scratching leaf litter and moving along the forest
understorey.
Pink-necked Green Pigeon Treron vemans
We observed this pigeon feeding on ripe Ficus fruits in
small groups of three to large groups of at least 20
individuals in Nug-as forest in August 2004. Small groups
were also seen feeding and moving around scrubland and
farmlands adjacent to forest. This species was first
rediscovered in Alcoy, Tabunan and Argao in 1998
(Gonzalez et al. 1999).
Black-chinned Fruit Dove Ptilinopus occipitalis
This species was feared extinct in Cebu (Brooks et al.,
1995) but we observed it on several different occasions
within the forest and in forest edges at Alcoy, Tabunan
and Argao. It was usually seen feeding on ripe Ficus fruits
or perched on exposed branches of trees. The bird was
recorded in 1998 in all three forest areas (Gonzalez et al.
1999). We found at least 12 active nests between 2002
and 2004 during the months of April-June.
Pink-bellied Imperial Pigeon Ducula poliocephala
We recorded this species only from Alcoy forest. It was
first reported by locals in 2003. We saw one individual in
November 2004 feeding silently on the ripe fruits of a
Ficus tree. The bird flew to a nearby tree and remained
still for less than a minute before disappearing from view.
The bird had a green breast with pinkish grey lower belly
and dark rufous on the vent. The tail had a grayish white
subterminal band, and the feet were bright red.
Metallic Wood Pigeon Columba vitiensis
Two individuals were first seen in Alcoy in March 2004.
They were feeding in the canopy of a Ficus tree at 700 m
elevation. Three other birds, one of which appeared to be
a juvenile (based on the smaller size), were seen perched
on an exposed branch of a canopy tree in November 2004.
They remained perched for at least five minutes before
moving to another location. In a separate occasion in
November 2004, two individuals were observed flying
low in the subcanopy and then perched on a branch of a
sub-canopy tree. This species was observed only in Alcoy
forest and was not seen or reported by locals in other forest
patches.
Philippine Hawk Owl Ninox philippensis spilonota
One juvenile was caught by a local at the forest edge in
Nug-as forest beside a tree hollow inside which was a nest.
A photograph was taken of the bird before release. Few
individuals were heard calling in Nug-as forest but
several were heard and seen in Tabunan forest. The call
was very distinct from the Philippine Hawk Owl in Negros
and the local name for the bird on Cebu is pakpak-tuhok.
This bird was feared extinct (Brooks et al. 1995) until it
was found in 1998 in all three forests patches (Gonzalez
etal. 1999).
Northern Boobook Ninox japonica
An individual was accidentally entangled in a network of
nylon strings used by local farmers as a trellis in Alcoy in
2003. After we examined it, we released back into the
adjacent forest. This species was also presumed extinct
on Cebu (Brooks et al. 1995) and ours is the first recent
confirmation of its existence in the area.
Variable Kingfisher Ceyx lepidus
This species was presumed extinct (Brooks et al. 1995)
but we mist-netted a single individual in a forest patch
beside a small stream in Mt Lantoy in 2004. This is the
first time the presence of this species has been confirmed
in the area.
White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smymensis
We observed this species close to the river in Mt Lantoy
in Argao and in abandoned fishponds with patches of
mangroves in the coastal areas of Argao.
Philippine Swiftlet Collocalia meamsi
This species was also presumed extinct on Cebu until
found in 1998 (Gonzalez et al. 1999). We observed several
small nesting colonies in limestone caves in Alcoy and
Mt Lantoy areas.
Philippine Needletail Meamsia picina
This is another species that was presumed extinct on the
island, until it was found in Nug-as forest in 1998
(Gonzalez etal. 1999). We have seen the bird twice flying
above the forest canopy in ridges.
DOLLARBIRD Eurystomus onentalis
We observed this species on three occasions in Nug-as
forest in 2004. It was also reported in 1998 in Alcoy forest
(Gonzalez et al. 1999).
Citrine Canary Flycatcher Culicicapa helianthea
This species was thought to be extinct in Cebu (Rabor
1959). We first saw it in November 2002 in the forest of
Alcoy, flycatching for insects among woody vines in the
forest sub-canopy. The bird was small with bright yellow
54
LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM Forktail 24 (2008)
head, breast, neck, belly and tail. The eye-ring and lores
were also yellow. The species was seen again in January
2003, and three individuals were observed participating
in a mixed-species tlock in June 2004 accompanied by
Everett’s White-eye, Black-naped Monarch, Orange-
bellied Flowerpecker, Elegant Tit, Crimson Sunbird and
Olive-backed Sunbird. Alcoy appears to be the only forest
in Cebu where the bird survives.
Lemon-throated Warbler Phylloscopus cebuensis
We mist-netted one individual of this species in Alcoy
forest in November 2004. The species was also observed
in several occasions in Mt Lantoy in Argao as well as in
Tabunan forest.
Plain-throated Sunbird Anthreptes malacensis
We observed this species feeding on the nectar of a
Loranthus plant growing on a 4 m tree beside the road in
Nug-as. The species was rare in Alcoy forest and was not
recorded in the other sites.
Philippine Pygmy Flowerpecker Dicaeum pygmaeum
We saw this species in Nug-as and Mt Lantoy forests. It
was presumed extinct on Cebu (Brooks et al. 1996) until
reported in Nug-as forest in 1 998 (Gonzalez et al. 1 999)
and it has been observed in the area several times since
then. We saw solitary individuals feeding on ripe fruits of
Loranthus and on small fruits of Ficus trees. They were
noisy and moved quickly from branch to branch searching
for insects and picking ripe fruits.
New records for Cebu
During our surveys, we found several species new to
Cebu.
Chinese Goshawk Accipiter soloensis
One individual of this species was caught in a mist-net on
14 November 2004 at 820 m elevation in the forest edge
in Alcoy forest. The bird was perched on a canopy tree,
from where it flew into the mist-net. The inner tail feathers
had five bars, and the tarsus was yellow-orange. The upper-
back was bluish-gray. The chin was white and the breast
was orange with whitish belly. The cere was yellow-orange.
Measurements of this individual are in Table 3. A large
migrating flock of c.80 individuals were also observed
soaring above the area. This species has not been reported
from Cebu before.
[YELLOW-BROWED WARBLER Phylloscopus inomatus ]
A Phylloscopus warbler was caught in the forest in Alcoy at
820 m elevation on 25 January 2003. The bird was small,
with a shorter wing span and tail than the larger Lemon-
throated Leaf Warbler P. cebuensis, Ijima’s Leaf Warbler
P. ijimae or Philippine Leaf Warbler P. olivaceus. There
was little or no yellow in its rather short whitish supercilium
(unlike these three species). The bill was narrow with
quite an extensive yellow base as compared to the wide bill
bases of the other species. The upperparts were duller
olive-green with no traces of yellow in the ventral area,
contrasting with the larger three species. The median and
greater covert feathers on each wing were growing, hence
wing bars could not be distinguished. The flight feathers
were variegated dark and lighter green, with the darker
parts towards the edges, creating a patterned effect on the
folded wing.
The descriptions and the range of features exhibited
by this individual suggests that it is a Yellow-browed
Warbler P. inomatus, a common wintering species in
Japan’s Ryukyu islands and in Taiwan, and expected in
small numbers in the Philippines between November and
March. This assessment is shared by Fergus Crystal (in
litt. 2007), who has examined the photographs of the
bird. The bird does not appear to show any pale stripe on
the central crown (ruling out Pallas’s Leaf Warbler P.
proregulus and Chinese Leaf Warbler P. sichuanensis,
although individuals of P. inomatus do occasionally show
a faint pale central crown stripe). Biometrical
measurements are in Table 3.
DISCUSSION
The number of species recorded differed substantially
among the three forest patches surveyed. This unevenness
in bird species richness can be partly attributed to
differences in the habitat type and quality. Nug-as forest,
being the largest continuous patch, holds the most intact
forest, thus most of the forest and non-forest species were
found here. Each site held a diversity of microhabitats:
although large trees still occur in all three forests patches,
Table 3. Biometric measurements of some of the birds caught in mist-nets during surveys from 2001 to 2004 on Cebu Island, Philippines. All
birds were adults except for Elegant Tit. Measurements were taken with a dial caliper; culmen is measured from skull, wing chord on folded wing,
wingspan on flattened wing, tarsus from rear middle of the intertarsal joint to the distal edge of the last complete scale before the toes begin, tail
from the base of feathers and mass with a spring balance with the bird in a bag of known mass.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Significant records of birds in forests on Cebu island
55
there are also a number of abandoned clearings, creating
breaks in the canopy and openings inside the forest at all
sites.
The presence of Black Shama on Nug-as and Mt
Lantoy forests was not unexpected. The species is known
to occur in a variety of habitats, including secondary
forests, tree plantations, scrub and bamboo plantations
(Dickinson et al. 1991, Collar et al. 1 999, Kennedy et al.
2000, Mallari et al. 2001). Black Shama was usually
encountered in areas with dark understorey and dense
vegetation, and both Alcoy and Argao still retain such
habitat.
The discovery of Cebu Flowerpecker in Nug-as forests
is especially significant. This species was rediscovered
first in Tabunan forests in 1992 (Timmins 1992, Dutson
1993) and the documented population was only four
individuals (Collar et al. 1999). The discovery of another
population in Nug-as forest gives some hope that more
thorough field surveys in other forests patches may reveal
extant populations of native forests birds not currently
thought to survive. Cebu Flowerpecker appears to be
intolerant to habitat disturbance and degradation (Collar
et al. 1999, Mallari et al. 2001), so the integrity of the
remaining forests on Cebu must be maintained if this
species is to persist.
Further surveys are also needed to confirm the
subspecific identification of the Amethyst Brown Dove in
Alcoy. This bird was claimed to occur in a separate forest
patch in the western part of the island (Gonzalez et al.
1999) but, although we observed one individual, we were
unable to positively identify it as belonging to the
subspecies frontalis.
Although we found some taxa that were formerly
thought to be extinct, we were unable to find others.
Among these were the Philippine Leafbird Chloropsis
flavipennis, Philippine Oriole, Blackish Cuckooshrike, Bar-
bellied Cuckooshrike, White-bellied Woodpecker,
Philippine Tailorbird Orthotomus castaneiceps, Rufous
Paradise Flycatcher Tersiphone cinnamomea and Sulphur¬
billed Nuthatch. Except for Philippine Tailorbird and
Sulphur-billed Nuthatch, the rest of the presumed extinct
species are medium- to large-sized birds, requiring tall
forest trees (Dickinson et al. 1991, Kennedy et al. 2000) .
These birds are also gregarious and give distinctive calls
that are difficult to miss in a small patch of forest such as
Tabunan and Nug-as. There is very little forest left in
Cebu and we found that all of the three forest patches
consisted mostly of regenerating second growth or
scrubland. Within these forests, very few large trees
persisted. Even in the largest forest patch of Nug-as, large
trees were rare and sparsely distributed. With the absence
of large standing trees, it is quite likely that the White-
bellied Woodpecker and the three canopy-dwelling birds
(Philippine Oriole, Blackish Cuckooshrike and Bar-bellied
Cuckooshrike) are nearly or already extinct on the island.
Further observations are needed (including sound
playback) in order to ascertain the status of these species
in other forest patches.
Threats and conservation initiatives
The remaining forests in central Cebu, including T abunan
forests, fall within the Strict Protection Zone of the Central
Cebu Protected Landscape (CCPL). In this landscape
we observed agricultural farms and a growing number of
settlements surrounding the forest. Most of the local
people make a living through agriculture. In several
instances we observed locals illegally cutting trees for
timber and fuel wood. Every year, parts of the forest were
slowly cleared to allow crops to be planted. A landslide in
the middle of the largest forest patch (Tabunan) was
converted into a farm, gradually splitting the forest into
two main blocks. We also observed portions of the adjacent
land in Cantipla being slowly developed for cut-flower
production and guava plantations by private individuals.
Rest houses and private resorts were also being built beside
the forest.
Hunting was prevalent in Mt Lantoy, mostly targeting
larger species of pigeons and doves, orioles, Coleto and
bats. We saw locals keeping birds in cages, and two hunters
were encountered during field sampling. We did not
observe or hear of hunting of birds in T abunan; however,
some locals keep birds in cages. Among the species kept
in cages were Black-chinned fruit dove. White-eared
Brown Dove, Blue-crowned Racquet-tail, Colasisi,
Brahminy Kite and imported parrots, lories and parakeets.
We were told that most of the birds had been caught from
the nearby islands of Leyte, Negros and Mindanao.
The forest in Alcoy is managed by people’s
organisations, including Kapunungan sa mga Mag-uuma
sa Yutang Lasangnon sa Bulalacao (KMYLB), Bag-ong
Alayon sa Kalambuan (BALAK) and San Agustin Multi-
Purpose Cooperative (SAMPC) under the Community-
based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) with
the government Department of Environment and N atural
Resources (DENR). Under this agreement, the local
communities are organised into cooperatives and work
together to maintain the biodiversity of the forest, and to
protect it from a further reduction in size for at least 25
years. Local forest wardens are organised to patrol and
monitor the wildlife and the forests. The cleared parts of
the forest have been replanted with native species of trees.
Importantly, these local organisations have the strong
support of other non-governmental organisations, local
government units and government agencies in their work
of managing and protecting the forest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was primarily funded by Rufford Small Grants for Nature
Conservation, North of England Zoological Society-Chester Zoo and
the Bristol, Clifton and West of England Zoological Society-Bristol
Zoo. We thank Roger Wilkinson, Duncan Bolton and Neil Maddison
for facilitating the approval of the project. We are also grateful for
additional financial assistance from the United Nations Development
Programme Small Grants Program (UNDP-SGP) and the American
Zoological Association. We thank Marisol dG. Pedregosa-Hospodarsky
and Juan Carlos Gonzalez for providing the necessary information about
the 1998 and 2000 surveys conducted in Cebu. We also acknowledge
the technical support and comments provided by William Oliver,
Desmond Allen and Jon Hornbuckle. We thank Fergus Crystal for
describing and helping identify the leaf warbler.
We would also like to thank the following persons for their assistance
in the field: M. J. G. Catacutan, O. O. Roxas, G. Boysillo, V. Linggo,
H. Alburo, E. Lillo, M. Cordova, J. Sardanas, M. Salmago, F. Catalbas,
R. Lepangue, Mayor N. de los Santos of Alcoy, Mayor A. Binghay of
Balamban, F. Mercado, Hon. L. Cabanog, P. Adlaw of KMYLB in
Nug-as, Alcoy, and the forest wardens of Nug-as particularly Pedro
Villarta, Geronimo Benolirao, Teodoro Amaca, Fernando Anore and
Joel Carulasan.
56
LISA MARIE J. PAGUNTALAN and PHILIP GODFREY JAKOSALEM Forktail 24 (2008)
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2008) Species factsheets. Available at http://
www.birdlife.org/datazone. Accessed on 17 June 2008.
Brooks, T. M., Magsalay, P., Dutson, G. and Allen, R. (1995) Forest
loss, extinction and last hope for birds of Cebu. Oriental Bird Club
Bull. 21: 24-27.
Bullecer, R., Elago, E., Embalzado Jr., F., Escobido, G. M., Gonzaga,
M., Largo, M. L., Layese Jr., L., Limocon, M., Moneva, L., Blanco.
L.A. and Lucero, R. (2006). Review and evaluation of Community-
based Tenure Instrument in Central Philippines. Available at http:/
/die. dlib.indiana.edu/archive/0000 1 852/. Accessed on 1 7 June 2008.
Collar, N. J., Mallari, N. A. D. andTabaranza Jr., B. R. (1999) Threatened
birds of the Philippines Makati City, Philippines: Bookmark.
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes K. C. (1991) The birds of
the Philippines. Tring, U. K.: British Ornithologists’ Union.
Dickinson, E. C. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist to the
birds of the World , Third edition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.
duPont , J. E. (1971) Philippine birds. Greenville, Delaware: Delaware
Museum of Natural History.
Dutson, G. (1993) Rediscovery of the Cebu Flowerpecker Dicaeum
quadricolor reconfirmed. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 17: 14.
Dutson, G. C. L., Magsalay, P. M. and Timmins R. J. (1993) The
rediscovery of the Cebu Flowerpecker Dicaeum quadricolor , with notes
on other forest birds on Cebu Philippines. Bird Conserv. Intemat. 3:
235-243.
Gonzalez, J. C. T., Dans, A. T. L., Pedregosa, M. dG. and Chiu, S.C.H.
(1998) Cebu biodiversity conservation project: a report on island¬
wide survey of forests and inventory of selected sites for priority
conservation on Cebu. Unpublished report submitted to Darwin
Initiative and Fauna and Flora International.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda Jr., H. C.
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) . A Guide to the Birds of the Philippines. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Magsalay, P. M. (1993). Rediscovery of four Cebu endemic birds
(Philippines). Asia Life Sciences 2: 141-148.
Magsalay, P., Brooks, T., Dutson, G. and Timmins, R. (1995)
Extinction and conservation on Cebu. Nature 373: 294.
Mallari, N. A. D., Tabaranza Jr., B. R. and Crosby, M. (2001) Key
conservation sites in the Philippines: a Haribon Foundation and BirdLife
International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City,
Philippines: Bookmark, Inc.
Orlanes, O. B. (2002) Ecological dynamics of Tabunan Forest, central
Cebu, Philippines. Unpublished M. Sc. thesis. UPLB-los Banos,
Laguna, Philippines.
Pedregosa, M. dG. (2000) The conservation status of Alcoy forest.
Unpublished report submitted to the North of England Zoological
Society-Chester Zoo.
Rabor, D. S. (1959). The impact of deforestation on birds of Cebu,
Philippines, with new records for that island. Auk 76: 37-43.
Timmins, R. (1992) Is the Cebu Flowerpecker extinct? Oriental Bird
Club Bull. 15: 10-11.
Lisa Marie J. Paguntalan and Philip Godfrey Jakosalem, Cebu Biodiversity Conservation Foundation, Inc., 18 Diamond
St., Gemsville Subd. , Lahug, CebuCity, 6000 Philippines. Email: UsamarieplO@yahoo.com, pgjakosaleml@yahoo.com
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 57-62
The status of the Himalayan Griffon
Gyps himalayensis in South-East Asia
YONG DING LI and CHAIYAN KASORNDORKBUA
The Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis, a large scavenging raptor previously known to be resident to the Sino-Himalayas and Central
Asia, is increasingly being recorded throughout South-East Asia. It now been recorded in six South-East Asian countries and is represented
by a total of over 30 documented records, mostly of immature birds. The causes for the increase in sightings are unknown, but we speculate
that climate change, deforestation and hunting, coupled with natural patterns of post-fledging dispersal and navigational inexperience
may be contributing to this change.
INTRODUCTION
The Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis is a poorly
known vulture, formerly accepted as resident or migrating
only altitudinally within Sino-Himalaya and Central Asia
(Thiollay 1994, Grimmett et al. 1999, Ferguson-Lees
and Christie 2001). This vulture has now also been found
in continental South-East Asia (e.g. Wells 1 999, Robson
2002, Gilbert et al. 2006). Since 1979, over 30 instances
have been reported in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia,
Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore (e.g. Lim 1998, Wells
1999, Robson 2002, Gilbert et al. 2006, Tordoff et al. in
press), with recent anecdotal evidence of occurrence in
neighbouring north-west Indonesia (K. C. Tsang in litt.
2008) . Most of these records occurred during the boreal
winter and, where age was determined, involved immature
individuals, including apparent juveniles. The complete
absence of earlier reports from the region suggests new
outward dispersive behaviour, although observer coverage
has been generally poor in the past.
Range and biology
Himalayan Griffon is the largest Asian Gyps vulture
(Thiollay 1994) and second largest regional raptor after
the Cinereous (Monk) Vulture Aegypius monachus. Its
main geographical range consists of the high uplands of
central and southern Asia, from Kazakhstan and
Afghanistan in the west through the Altai and Tien Shan
ranges, Tibetan plateau and Himalayas east to western
China (Yunnan, Sichuan, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia) and
Mongolia (Ali 1962, Ali and Ripley 1968, Meyer de
Schauensee 1984, Inskipp and Inskipp 1985,
Rnystautas 1993, Thiollay 1994, Grimmett et al. 1999,
MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000, Ferguson-Lees and
Christie 2001). According to latitude, breeding occurs at
elevations of between 600 and 4,500 m. Foraging birds
are seen as high as 5,000 m or more and non¬
breeding altitudinal migrants spend the boreal winter
down to plains level, having been recorded as low as
175 m near Bharatpur, eastern Rajasthan, India,
immediately south of the Himalayas (Ferguson-Lees and
Christie 2001).
As with other Gyps vultures, Himalayan Griffons are
mainly specialists on large mammal (including livestock)
carrion, their food being found visually while soaring,
either directly or by monitoring other scavenging birds,
e.g., other vultures and corvids. Their large body-size
confers feeding dominance over other vulture species in
mixed gatherings at a carcass, except in the presence of
Cinereous Vulture (Thiollay 1994, Grimmett etal. 1999,
Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001).
OCCURRENCE IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA
The synopsis of records of the Himalayan Griffon
presented here draws on published data and
correspondence with review committees and individual
observers. It includes only those records that are reliably
and adequately documented. From 1979 to 2008 there
were over 30 records, involving many more individual
vultures, in possibly increasing numbers, and from all
countries of political South-East Asia except Laos and
Vietnam. More than half (i.e., 16 records) came from
Thailand (P. D. Round in litt. 2007), where observer
coverage has been extensive for a good part of this period.
In descending order by country, the rest were from
Singapore (8 records), Peninsular Malaysia (5), Myanmar
(4), Cambodia (3), and Indonesia (1). These records are
listed with their corresponding sources in Table 1.
Elsewhere, recent occurrence away from the breeding
range has also been reported at Jinju, South Korea,
apparently for the first time in north-east Asia (C . Moores
in litt. 2007). Here we present an account of the South-
East Asian records, organised by country.
Myanmar
Myanmar, whose territory is geographically nearest to
the Himalayas, surprisingly has no historical records of
Himalayan Griffon (Smythies 1953, King et al. 1975,
Robson 2000, 2002). The first national records were
reported during a series of avifaunal surveys in Kachin
state, northern Myanmar, during November-December
2004 (Tordoff et al. in press), comprising a single
individual over Kamaing town on 6 December 2004, and
groups of 1 1 and 23 individuals mingling with other Gyps
vultures at Indawgyi and Mogaung Chaung respectively.
Subsequent surveys using designated vulture restaurants
to assess populations of resident vulture species in Kachin
state have found large numbers of Himalayan Griffons.
As many as 93 individuals, including many juveniles, were
detected during December 2006, and the species was
present at 60% of the sites sampled (Eames 2006, 2007),
suggesting that this species is more regular and abundant
in Myanmar than formerly thought. In view of its
geographic proximity to the Sino-Himalayas, large land
area, generally low observer coverage, and the large
numbers of birds recorded particularly in the 2006 surveys.
58 _ YONG DING LI and CHAIYAN KASORNDORKBUA Forktail 24 (2008)
We are not able to trace detailed records for Myanmar from after 2006
Forktail 24 (2008) The status of the Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis in South-East Asia
59
Figure 1. Distribution of records of Himalayan Griffon Gyps
himalayensis across South-East Asia. Myanmar: 1 Kamaing, 2 Nawn
Kwin, 3 Indawgyi, 4 Mogaung Chaung; Thailand: 5 Doi Lang, 6 Doi
Pha Horn Pok, 7 Doi Ang Khang, 8 Chiang Mai, 9 Mae Ngao National
Park, 10 Buri Ram, 11 Khon Kaen, 12 Khao Yai National Park, 13
Sukhumvit (Bangkok), 14 Kham Sam Roi Yot, 15 Surat Thani, 16
Phang Nga, 17 Karon Bay (Phuket), 18 Yan Tah Kao (Trang), 19
Patthalung; Cambodia: 20 Chhep (Preah Vihear); Malaysia: 21 Sungei
Paka (Terengganu), 22 Putrajaya Wetlands, 23 Muar, 24 Batu Pahat,
25 Johor Bahru; Singapore: 26 Singapore; Indonesia: 27 Bintan island.
a well-documented group of eight that appeared over the
Sukhumvit road area of central Bangkok in 1989. As
elsewhere, frequency of occurrence has increased and
from 2004 onwards records became near-annual, with an
all time high of four sightings in the winter of 2007-2008,
involving nearly 30 individuals in total, including many
juveniles (Round 2006, 2008, Kasorndorkbua 2008) . The
Doi Pha Horn Pok-Doi Lang massif along the Thai-
Burmese border, well-covered by local birdwatchers, has
seen the regular occurrence of Himalayan Griffons in
recent years, with eight recorded in December 2007. The
country’s largest spot count, however, comes from Mae
Ngao National Park, Mae Hong Son province, c. 1 00 km
west of Doi Pha Horn Pok, where two juveniles, one
subadult and 15 birds of unknown age were seen in
December 2007 . As suggested by the many recent records
near the northern end of the Thailand-Myanmar border,
Himalayan Griffons were probably dispersing out of
Myanmar, hence suggesting a link with the large numbers
seen in Kachin state, Myanmar.
Cambodia
Occurrence has only very recently been documented, with
a first national record from Chhep in the northern province
of Preah Vihear in 2004 (Gilbert eial. 2006). Later, there
were sporadic sightings of single individuals at the same
site during the winters of 2006-2007 (T. Clements in litt.
2008, P. D. Round in litt. 2008) and 2007-2008, when
possibly the same individual was seen a number of times
by different visiting birding groups (J. Eaton in litt. 2008,
B. W. Low in litt. 2008). This site, which is near the
Cambodia-Laos border, is also the location of a regular
vulture restaurant and is attended by large numbers of
resident Indian White-backed Gyps indicus, Slender-billed
G. tenuirostris and Red-headed Vultures Sarcogyps calvus.
Regular provision of cattle carcasses here may benefit
Himalayan Griffons as well.
Peninsular Malaysia
Records here include the only sighting made outside
northern winter months: an exhausted bird (specimen
now in the collection of the Malaysian Federal Wildlife
Department) captured at Sungei Paka, Terengganu state,
supposedly in late June 1979 (Wells 1999). This is the
only record from east of the Main Range in the Peninsula.
All others have been from the west coast plain. A lapse of
nearly 1 5 years occurred before the second record, of one
individual captured in Muar, Northwest Johore state and
taken into captivity at the Melaka Zoo in 1995
(Jeyarajasingham and Pearson 1999). The third was of
one rescued from the Putrajaya Wetlands Reserve, Federal
Territory and taken to Melaka Zoo in February 2004 (W.
C. Cheonginlitt. 2008). Subsequently, sightings ofsingle
individuals have been reported from Batu Pahat, also in
Northwest Johor (W. C. Cheong in litt. 2007) and one
soaring over the coast at Johor Bahru, South Johore (J.
Heng in litt. 2008).
Singapore
Two sightings of ‘large vultures’ made at Changi, eastern
Singapore, in 1 999 and 2007, submitted without details,
supplement the eight accepted Singapore records, these
all occurring within a three-month window from mid-
December to February. According to Wells (1999), the
earliest documented occurrence was in December 1989:
four individuals on open, reclaimed land at Tuas,
Southwest Singapore, of which at least one was captured
and still survives in captivity at the Jurong bird park.
Subsequently, a group of nine, the largest-ever count for
Singapore, settled in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve in
January 1 992 (Lim and Gardner 1 997, Lim 1 998, Wang
and Hails 2007). After a long interval (13 years if the
unconfirmed 1999 Changi record is omitted) two juveniles
were seen in suburban southern Singapore in January
2005 (Habitatnews 2005), and 1 -2 individuals have been
reported in both subsequent winters. In all cases these
have included starved birds, all juveniles too weak to fly
and soon taken into captivity for veterinary management
(J. Cheema verbally 2007). There were separate reports
during the winter of 2007-2008, compared with only
single records in the previous years, suggesting that in
Singapore, too, frequency of occurrence is increasing.
Indonesia
A Himalayan Griffon (identification supported by
photographs) has recently been reported to be held captive
in a private collection on Bintan Island, Riau Islands
province, Sumatra (K. C. Tsang in litt. 2008). In
correspondence, the owner claimed it was caught while
60
YONG DING LI and CHAIYAN KASORNDORKBUA
Forktail 24 (2008)
attempting to feed on carcasses at a local pig farm in
December 2007. While no conclusive proof of wild rather
than ‘imported’ origin is available, Bintan is only a short
distance south of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore, and
the nearly 50 km water gap is probably easily crossed by
a soaring bird.
DISCUSSION
Possible reasons for occurrence in South-East Asia
Despite its large size and detectability, the striking lack of
mention of Himalayan Griffon in all except recent South-
East Asian ornithological literature suggests that this
species was historically absent from the region. Several
hypotheses have been proposed to explain this apparent
change of status, none based on more than intelligent
guesswork, and even circumstantial evidence is lacking
because no information is available on the true geographic
origin (i.e. the source populations) of the birds involved
or on their journey routes. Wells (1999) and Wang and
Hails (2007) implicated the bird trade by suggesting the
possible escape or release of imported captives. This is
now thought unlikely given that large birds held captive
for long periods in the confined space of a cage would
show damage to flight and tail feathers, and signs of soiling
due to faecal contamination. Region-wide, no such
damage has been reported either in captured individuals
or in wild birds photographed at close range, all of which
appeared wound-free and had clean, unabraded wing
and tail tips (Wells 1999).
A more likely explanation is the new records natural,
involving long-distance dispersal movements over and
above the altitudinal migration known to occur around
the edge of the breeding range. Several factors could be
playing synergistic roles and we suggest a link to the decline
of large mammals, leading to food shortage in the breeding
range, and resulting in long-distance dispersal of the
species. Such a decline of large mammals might be linked
to climate change (Barnosky et al. 2004, Murray-Clay
2005) , perhaps through its impact on natural vegetation
in the upper Himalaya and the Tibetan Plateau (e.g. Liu
and Chen 2000, Shrestha et al. 2004, Zhao et al. 2004,
Fukui et al. 2007). A more likely cause of large mammals
decline could be the direct impact of changing wealth,
transport and social conditions, and attitudes to the
environment, particularly in Tibet and especially in
relation to guns and hunting. In the Himalayas generally,
the impact of subsistence hunting of large animals is still
poorly known (Kaul et al. 2004), but two herd-living
ungulates endemic to the Tibetan Plateau, Tibetan
Gazelle Procapra picticaudata and Tibetan Antelope
Panthalops hodgsoni, are both recorded as having suffered
massive range and population contractions in the recent
past, attributed directly to over-hunting (Bhatnagar et al.
2006) . It is thus possible that human hunting pressure
through the upland range of the Himalayan Griffon has
spawned a poorly monitored yet significant reduction in
the availability of wild (as opposed to livestock) carrion.
This, in combination with a natural tendency for young
birds to disperse away from natal sites (Newton 2007)
and to be navigationally inexperienced (Alerstam 2005),
could lead to young Himalayan Griffons wandering
outside the traditional range of the species, and their
appearance in new territories.
Possible movement patterns
As suggested by the spatiotemporal distribution of records
throughout South-East Asia and the high frequencies of
juveniles or subadults encountered, it appears that there
is some form of general movement trend. First, most
records throughout South-East Asia occurred within the
months (October-March) of the boreal winter in the
Himalayas, Tibetan Plateau and central Asia. This means
that dispersal movements and patterns of the Himalayan
Griffon can at least be circumstantially linked to seasonal
changes, perhaps arising as a result of reduced food
availability during the winter. Second, the clear age bias
towards juveniles and subadults suggests a link with post-
fledging dispersal. Immature birds tend to be more
inexperienced in foraging and navigation and are thus
more vulnerable to straying out of suitable foraging habitat
along aberrant flight routes (Alerstam 2005) . Third, there
is a concentration of records, particularly records involving
‘large groups’ towards more northerly areas in South-
East Asia (e.g. Myanmar, North Thailand) (Table 1).
Records involving small groups or single individuals are
more spread out elsewhere in South-East Asia. This
pattern is probably linked to the breeding range of the
Himalayan Griffon, which is located north-northwest of
South-East Asia; the concentration of records is towards
the fringe of the range rather than farther away. Birds
moving southward down the Malay Peninsula and
Singapore towards Indonesia could possibly be limited
by sea crossings, hence explaining the paucity of
Indonesian records (only one so far).
Conservation issues
The current global conservation status category of the
Himalayan Griffon is Least Concern (IUCN 2007),
although difficulty of access to much of its mountainous
range renders population surveys difficult. Unlike other
highly threatened Gyps spp. of South and South-East
Asia (Pain et al. 2003, Oaks et al. 2004), it is not regarded
as seriously exposed to diclofenac poisoning, though this
may not apply to the dispersers reaching South-East Asia.
What proportion of the total annual production of young
fledged these dispersers represent is unknown. The high
rate of capture of weakened birds as they move south
suggests independently that many or most of these
immatures will not make a return journey and hence are
lost to the breeding population. Some effort, particularly
in Thailand, has been made to rehabilitate and release
vultures back into suitable habitat in the north, though
this has met with limited success due to veterinary and
political concerns. Satellite telemetry tracking (Bogel
1994) would be highly instructive and might even
demonstrate that some return movement does occur, but
the loss of a Cinereous Vulture shot in Myanmar weeks
after its release in Thailand (Casey 2007) highlights the
trans-boundary difficulties involved in both this and
regional vulture rehabilitation in general.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A number of individuals contributed records and other relevant
information. We would like to express our thanks. These include Alfred
Chia, Ashley Ng, Charlie Moores, Cheong Weng Chun, James Eaton,
James Heng, Jeet Cheema, Ivhanit Kanikul, Lee Tiah Kee, Lim Kim
Chuah, Low Bing Wen, Ong Kiem Sian, Philip D. Round, Tom
Forktail 24 (2008) The status of the Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis in South-East Asia
61
Clements, T sang Kwok Choong. Thanks go particularly to Philip Round
and the Bird Conservation Society of Thailand (BCST) for granting
access to records and to two anonymous reviewers who commented on
the first draft of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Alerstam, T. (2005) Ecological causes and consequences of bird
orientation. Cell and Molecular Life Sci. 46(4): 405-415.
Ali, S. (1962) The birds of Sikkim. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1968) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan. Vol. 1. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Barnosky, A. D., Bell, C.’J., Emslie, S. D., Goodwin, H. T., Mead, J.
I., Repenning, C. A., Scott, E. and Shabel, A. B. (2004) Exceptional
record of mid-Pleistocene vertebrates helps differentiate climatic
from anthropogenic ecosystem perturbations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.,
USA 101(25): 9297-9302.
BCST (2006) 2006 Thailand bird reports. Bird Cons. Soc.
Thai. Bull. Available at http://www.worldtwitch.com/
2006_thailand_bird_reports.htm. Accessed on 21 April 2008.
Bhatnagar, Y. V., Wangchuk, R. and Mishra, C. (2006) Decline of the
Tibetan gazelle Procapra picticaudata in Ladakh, India. Oryx 40(2):
229-232.
Bogel, R. (1994) Measuring locations and flight altitudes of griffon
vultures Gyps fulvus by an automatic telemetry system. Pp. 325-
333 in B. U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, eds. Raptor conservation
today. Berlin: World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls.
Casey, M. (2007) Rare vulture shot dead in Myanmar after being freed
in Thailand. Associated Press news article, 22 November 2007.
Meyer deSchauensee, R. (1984) The birds of China. Washington, D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution.
Deignan, H. G. (1945) The birds of northern Thailand. Washington,
D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Eames, J. (2006) Vulture research project launched in Myanmar. The
Babbler 20: 29.
Eames, J. (2007) Mega transect counts vultures across Myanmar. The
Babbler 2 1 : 30.
Ferguson-Lees, J. and Christie, D. A. (2001) Raptors of the world. Boston,
Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
Fukui, K., Fujii, Y., Ageta, Y. and Asahi, K. (2007) Changes in the
lower limit of mountain permafrost between 1973 and 2004 in the
Khumbu Himal, the Nepal Himalayas. Global Planet. Change 55:
251-256.
Gibson-Hill, C.A. ( 1 949) An annotated checklist of the birds of Malaya.
Bull. Raffles Mus. 20: 5-299.
Gienapp, P., Leimu, R. and Merila, J. (2007) Responses to climate
change in avian migration time — microevolution versus phenotypic
plasticity. Climate Res. 35: 25-35.
Gilbert, M., Chansocheat, S. and Sureda, N. (2006) First record of
Himalayan Griffon Vulture Gyps himalayensis in Chhep, Preah
Vihear, northern Cambodia. Vulture News 55: 4-5.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1999) A guide to the birds
of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and the
Maldives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Habitatnews (2005) Himalayan Griffon Vultures in Singapore. Available
at http://habitatnews.nus. edu.sg/index.php?entry=/news/vulture-
09jan2005.txt. Accessed on 21 April 2008.
Habitatnews (2006) 23 Jan 2006 — A Himalayan Griffon Gyps
himalayensis in Singapore. Available at http://
habitatnews.nus.edu.sg/index.php?entry=/nature/20060127-
gyps_himalyensis.txt. Accessed on 21 April 2008.
Inouye, D. W., Barr, B., Armitage, K. B. and Inouye, B. D. (2000)
Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating
species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA 97(4): 1630-1633.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1985) A Guide to the Birds of Nepal. London,
U. K.: Croom Helm.
IUCN (2007) IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available at http:/
/www. redlist.org. Accessed on 29 January 2008.
Jetz, W., Wilcove, D. S. and Dobson, A. P. (2007) Projected impacts
of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds.
PLoS Biology 5(6): 121 1-1219.
Jeyarajasingham, A. and Pearson, A. (1999) A field guide to the birds of
West Malaysia and Singapore. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University
Press.
Kasorndorkbua, C. (2008) Raptors aloft Thailand. Harrier 1(1):
30-37.
Kaul, R., Hilaluddin, Jandrotia, J. S. and McGowan, P. J. K. (2004)
Hunting of large mammals and pheasants in the Indian western
Himalaya. Oryx 38: 426 - 431.
King, B. F., Woodcock, M. W. and Dickinson, E. C. (1975) A field
guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London, U.K.: Collins.
Knystautas, A. (1993) Birds of Russia. London, U.K.: HarperCollins.
Lekagul, B. and Round, P. D. (1991) A guide to the birds of Thailand.
Bangkok: Saha Kam Bhaet Co.
Lim, K. S. (1998) Records committee report, 1994. Iora 1: 42-43.
Lim, K. S. and Gardner, D. (1997) Birds: An illustrated field guide to the
birds of Singapore. Singapore: Suntree Publishing.
Liu, X. and Chen, B. (2000) Climatic warming in the Tibetan
Plateau during recent decades. Int. J. Climatol. 20: 1729-
1742.
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Murray-Clay, R. (2005) Whodunnit? : Mystery of the missing
megafauna. Berkeley Science Review 9: 30-34.
NetNeathandTanSetha, eds. (2001) A wildlife survey of Bokor National
Park, Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Wildlife Conservation Society.
Newton, I. (2007) The migration ecology of birds. London, U.K.: Academic
Press.
Oaks, J. L., Martin, G., Virani, M. Z., Watson, R. T., Meteyer, C. U.,
Rideout, B. A., Shivaprasad, H. L., Ahmed, S., Chaudhry, I.,
Jamshed, M., Arshad, M., Mahmood, S., Ali, A. and Ahmed Khan,
A. (2004) Diclofenac residues as the cause of vulture decline in
Pakistan. Nature 427: 630-633.
Pain, D. J., Cunningham, A. A., Donald, P. F., Duckworth, J. W.,
Houston, D. C., Katzner, T., Parry-Jones, J., Poole, C., Prakash,
V. , Round, P. D. and Timmins, R. (2003) Causes and effects of
temporospatial declines of Gyps vultures in Asia. Conserv. Biol. 17:
661-671.
Pandit, M. K., Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Bhaskar, A. and Brook, B. W.
(2007) Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic
biodiversity in the Indian Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 16(1): 153-
163.
Robson, C. (2000) A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London,
U.K.: New Holland.
Robson, C. (2002) A field guide to the birds of Thailand. London, U.K.:
New Holland.
Round, P. D. (2007) Recent reports. Bird Conserv. Soc. Thailand Bull.
24(1): 27-29.
Round, P. D. (2008) Recent reports. Bud Conserv. Soc. Thailand Bull.
25(1): 32-35.
Shrestha, A. B., Wake, C. P., Mayewski, P. A. and Dibb, J. E. (1999)
Maximum temperature trends in the Himalaya and its vicinity: an
analysis based on records from Nepal for the period 1971-94. J.
Climate 12(3): 2775-2786.
Smythies, B. E. (1953) The Birds of Burma. Second Edition. London,
U.K.: Oliver and Boyd.
Thiollay, J-M. (1994) Himalayan Griffon. P. 127 in Handbook of the
birds of the world , Vol. 2. J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
62
YONG DING LI and CHAIYAN KASORNDORKBUA
Forktail 24 (2008)
Tordoff, A. W., Appleton, T., Eames, J. C., Eberhardt, K., Htin Hla,
Khin Ma Ma Thwin, Sao Myo Zaw, Saw Moses and Sein Myo
Aung (in press) Avifaunal surveys in the lowlands of Ka chin State,
Myanmar, 2003-2005. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc.
Wang, L. K. and Hails, C. J. (2007) An annotated checklist of the birds
of Singapore. Raffles Bull. Zool. Suppl. 15: 1-179.
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay peninsula, Vol. 1: Non¬
passerines. London, U.K.: Academic Press.
Zhao, L., Ping, C-L., Yang, D., Cheng, G., Ding, Y. and Liu, S. (2004)
Changes of climate and seasonally frozen ground over the past 30
years in Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) Plateau, China. Global Planet.
Change 43: 1 9-3 1 .
Yong Ding Li, Bukit Batok Street 21, Block 209, # 03-188 . Singapore 650209. Email: zoothera@yahoo.com
Chaiyan Kasomdorkbua, Thai Raptor Group, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University,
50 Paholyothin Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900 Thailand. Email: trogon@gmail.com
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 63-79
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from
South-East Asia
PETER R. KENNERLEY, DAVID N. BAKEWELL and PHILIP D. ROUND
Several pale Charadrius plovers associating with Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam,
which were presumed not to resemble any known taxon, have been recorded since 1993. Evidence is presented which establishes that
these birds are Aegialites [Charadrius] dealbarus, described by Robert Swinhoe in 1 870 as a species distinct from Kentish Plover. Subsequent
confusion has resulted in this name being applied to the form of Kentish Plover that occurs in abundance in East and South-East Asia,
while the true taxon dealbarus has been overlooked by almost all subsequent taxonomists, and mistakenly described and illustrated as
Kentish Plover in all studies of this taxon. This paper suggests that this confusion arose, in part, due to misconceptions over the appearance
of dealbatus, which resulted in many museum specimens of Kentish Plover from East Asia being incorrectly identified and erroneously
labelled as dealbatus. Swinhoe did not designate a type specimen when he described dealbatus, and this was only done in 1896, from a
composite series of Swinhoe’s specimens that comprised two taxa. Here, we formally select and describe a lectotype of Aegialites
[ Charadrius ] dealbatus from Swinhoe’s pre-1870 specimens, list all known Swinhoe specimens of the composite taxa as paralectotypes
of Aegialites [Charadrius] dealbatus and establish which specimens represent this taxon and which are Kentish Plover. Comparison with
other small Charadrius plovers occurring in South-East Asia establishes the diagnosibilty of dealbatus as a distinct taxon that differs in
aspects of plumage, behaviour, habitat preference and breeding distribution from the commonly occurring Kentish Plover in East and
South-East Asia. Consistent morphological differences from Kentish Plover include a larger and heavier bill with a pale base to the lower
mandible, pale pinkish-grey legs, light sandy-brown upperparts and a longer and more conspicuous wing-bar, particularly across the
primaries. We describe plumage differences between sexes and age classes, and compare dealbatus with Kentish and Malaysian Plover
C. peronii. The breeding range remains uncertain but probably lies in coastal South China, and evidence suggests that dealbatus is allopatric
with Kentish Plover, which breeds in northern China. An investigation to establish the phylogenetic relationship between dealbatus and
other small Charadrius plovers is currently in progress. If dealbatus proves to be distinct at the species level, we recommend that the name
Charadrius dealbatus with the English name ‘White-faced Plover’ is adopted. The name Charadrius alexandrinus nihonensis is available for
the larger-billed form of Kentish Plover breeding in north-eastern Asia. The true taxon dealbatus is believed to be rare but probably under¬
recorded.
INTRODUCTION
Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus is a common and
familiar shorebird, breeding on coastal and inland wetlands
throughout the warm temperate regions of Europe, Asia,
and northern Africa, and also in North America and on
the west coast of South America. Across its vast range
there is considerable geographical variation, with five races
recognised by del Hoyo et al. (1996). Within Asia, there
is almost universal acceptance that three races of Kentish
Plover occur. As a breeding bird, the nominate race is
widespread from southern and western Europe, and North
Africa, east across much of central Asia to the Nei Mongol
Autonomous Region in north-eastern China. In China,
the slightly larger-billed but otherwise similar form, C. a.
dealbatus , is said to breed from the southern coastal
provinces of Hainan, Guangxi and Guangdong, north to
Liaoning (Cheng 1987). It is also generally accepted that
C. a. dealbatus breeds in Japan from Honshu south through
Kyushu to the Ryukyu islands (Vaurie 1965, Hayman et
al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996). However, Brazil (1991)
referred to the Japanese breeding birds as belonging to the
race C. a. nihonensis. In addition to these two migratory
races, a smaller resident form, C. a. seebohmi , breeds in the
coastal lowlands of Sri Lanka and the southern tip of
peninsular India (Ali and Ripley 1969). A fourth taxon,
previously treated as an insular race of Kentish Plover
(Chasen 1938, Hoogerwerf 1967), is now widely
recognised as a distinct species, Javan Plover C.javanicus,
(Cramp and Simmons 1983, Inskipper al. 1996, del Hoyo
etal. 1996, Dickinson 2003, Clements 2007). Javan Plover
is believed to be resident on Java, but was discovered to be
breeding at Kuala Penet, Lampung, Sumatra, in June
2007 (I. Londo/WCS in litt. 2008), and may also breed in
Sulawesi, where it is regularly observed (P. Morris in litt.
2007).
Northern populations of Kentish Plover are migratory
and winter to the south of the breeding range. In China,
wintering birds remain as far north as the Yangtze River,
and they are common in coastal regions in the southern
coastal provinces of China. Small numbers also winter in
southern Japan, and the species is numerous in winter
from Taiwan, south through the Malay Peninsula to
Singapore, as well as in the Philippines and Borneo (Cheng
1987, Wells 1999, Carey etal. 200 1). Outside the breeding
season, Kentish Plover moults into a drabber plumage,
making racial separation of the migratory taxa problematic
at this season.
This paper challenges this long-standing arrangement
and presents evidence which establishes that the Kentish
Plovers of eastern Asia, widely accepted as being C. a.
dealbatus , are, in fact, largely indistinguishable from
Kentish Plovers of the nominate form. We shed new light
on the highly distinctive appearance of the taxon dealbatus,
which has been overlooked in the field, confused and
mislabelled in museum collections, and omitted from the
published literature since the nineteenth century. We also
comment on the validity of C. a. nihonensis as a distinct
taxon.
THE DISCOVERY OF AN
UNKNOWN PLOVER
Kentish Plover is a fairly common winter visitor to
Singapore, where small numbers formerly over-wintered
on a large land reclamation site at Tuas. In October 1993,
PRK and others observed several small Charadrius plovers
64
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
which were distinctly paler than the accompanying
Kentish Plovers. When initially discovered, all were in
nondescript non-breeding plumage and closely resembled
Kentish Plover, although they consistently differed in
their conspicuously paler sandy-brown upperparts and
paler greyish or pinkish-brown legs, while in flight the
white wing-bar appeared broader and more noticeable.
Furthermore, the structure of these birds differed slightly
from Kentish Plover: they were noticeably larger-headed
and heavier-billed, and slightly longer-legged, particularly
the tibia. Notes and field sketches were made and
compared with illustrations and descriptions of Charadrius
plovers in Hayman etal. ( 1 986), which depicted one paler
bird, described as a non-breeding adult, with the comment
‘ . . .Some, like this individual, may become faded and worn
in tropical winter quarters’. However, other than noting
these apparently minor differences in plumage and
structural characters, no further progress was made
towards establishing their identity until February 1994,
despite regular observations throughout this four-month
period.
On 20 February 1994, PRK, together with Angus
Lamont, spent several hours watching the roosting plover
flock at Tuas. On this date, many Kentish Plovers had
completed their pre-breeding moult, and with these were
three extremely distinctive plovers, clearly males, that we
could not identify. Like male Kentish Plovers, they showed
a dark band across the fore-crown, an orange cap and
dark patches at the sides of the breast. Unlike male Kentish
Plovers, however, the lores were entirely white and there
was only a small, dull spot behind the eye, so the dark eye
appeared isolated within the white facial feathering, and
seemed exceptionally large and conspicuous. The
upperparts were pale sandy-brown, however, like those
birds seen earlier in the winter. With these three males
were up to five females with similar pale sandy-brown
upperparts. As well as sharing structural similarities with
the males, these females displayed a warm and fairly bright
rufous-brown wash to the cap, and slightly duller rufous-
brown patches at each side of the breast, and a variable
loral line; on some birds this appeared as a small rufous-
brown spot in front of the eye, while on others it formed
a distinct loral line between the bill and eye. Reference to
Hayman et al. (1986) again failed to reveal a plover with
characters that matched these birds.
This plover flock remained at Tuas until 14 March
1994 when the last bird, a female, was present together
with >25 Kentish Plovers. Shortly after this date, the
Kentish Plover flock departed, presumably returning to
their northern breeding areas. Although the Kentish Plover
flock returned to Tuas in the following winter, the paler
birds did not accompany them.
There were no further known or published sightings
from Singapore or elsewhere until October 2006, when
DNB noted an unusually pale Charadrius plover
associating with a Kentish Plover on a land reclamation
site at Tanjung Tokong, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, on 1 1
October 2006, which he tentatively identified as a
Malaysian Plover C. peronii. Following discussion with
PRK, it was realised that these plovers could be the same
as the birds seen in Singapore. By December 2006,
numbers had increased to >22 Kentish Plovers and no
fewer than 1 2 unusually pale Charadrius plovers. At least
five of the latter birds remained until early March 2007,
and during this period DNB was able to obtain many
photographs. As with the Tuas birds, these birds
underwent a pre-breeding body moult and by early
February 2007 they had transformed into a distinctive
plover displaying a suite of characters that did not
correspond with any taxon described in the available
literature. Furthermore, these images closely matched
the birds that PRK had described and sketched at Tuas
almost 13 years earlier. The last sighting at Tanjung
Tokong was of a presumed first-summer male on 28 March
2007.
Observations of Kentish Plovers throughout their
breeding and wintering ranges in central and northern
Asia, combined with observations of Kentish Plovers of
the race C. a. seebohmi in Sri Lanka, Javan Plover C.
javanicus in Java, Indonesia, and Malaysian Plover in
Singapore, Thailand and elsewhere in South-East Asia,
have established that the field characters associated with
these taxa differed significantly from the pale Charadrius
plovers observed in Singapore and Malaysia.
The search for specimens
Although it was suspected that these pale Charadrius
plovers might prove to be an undescribed taxon, it seemed
inconceivable that such a distinctive plover could have
been overlooked in South-East Asia, which has a long
history of bird-related research and shorebird studies.
The possibility that similar birds may have been previously
collected but lie unrecognised in museum collections was
investigated.
Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research,
Singapore
PRK examined Kentish Plover specimens held in the
Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research at the National
University of Singapore in early 1 994. Here, two birds in
non-breeding plumage that resembled the pale birds seen
at Tuas were located. Both were labelled Charadrius
alexandrinus dealbatus by the same unknown collector,
and were collected at Batu, Selangor coast, Malaya
[Malaysia], on 26 November 1906. Although both
specimens were in non-breeding plumage, they had been
sexed as males. The remaining 1 6 Kentish Plovers in this
collection, from Japan (1), Sarawak (7), Vietnam (4),
Malaysia (1) Singapore (2) and Thailand (1), were also
labelled Charadrius alexandrinus dealbatus , but were
indistinguishable from Kentish Plovers which winter in
South-East Asia. The two pale specimens (specimen
reference numbers ZRC 3.2540 and ZRC 3.2541) were
sent on loan to the NHM, Tring, in June 2007 for further
detailed examination and comparison with Kentish Plover
specimens held in that collection. These specimens are
listed in Appendix 1.
Natural History Museum (NHM), Tring, U.K.
Examination of Kentish Plover specimens held in the
NHM, Tring, by PRK revealed no fewer than 30
Charadrius plovers showing plumage and bare part
characters consistent with the pale plovers observed in
Malaysia and Singapore. All were collected at locations
ranging from central Vietnam to coastal southern China.
Significantly, 1 5 of these specimens, collected by Robert
Swinhoe prior to 1870, came from localities along the
south coast of China, which Swinhoe (1870) identified as
the type locality for the bird he named Aegialites dealbatus ,
(hereafter referred to as ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus') .
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
65
Furthermore, all specimens matching the description of
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' from the type locality were dated
between the months of March and July, with the sole
exception of a bird from Macau collected on 30 January
1906. With these, however, were a further 20 specimens
of typically darker Kentish Plover, also collected by
Swinhoe prior to 1870 from locations in southern China,
hereafter referred to as ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover. All these
darker birds had, however, been collected during the
winter months between October and March, with the
exception of a single August bird from Amoy [now
Xiamen, Fujian province, China], Those specimens
identified as ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' are listed in Appendix
1, and their locations are shown in Fig. 1 .
Smithsonian Institution (USNM), Division of Birds,
Washington DC, U.S.A.
The USNM collection holds 46 specimens of Kentish
Plover collected in East and South-East Asia, including
41 from China (including Flong Kong), three from
Malaysia and two from Thailand. Deignan (1941)
examined these specimens and commented that this
collection held several pale specimens including a series
from Amoy collected in June and July, plus others from
northern China, Thailand and Malaysia. B. Schmidt of
the Smithsonian Institution, Division of Birds,
photographed those specimens to which Deignan referred,
enabling us to review the identifications. Based upon these
photographs, the identification of nine specimens (five
from southern China, one from Thailand and three from
Malaysia) has been established as ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’
and these are listed in Appendix 1 . The remainder are
undoubtedly typical ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers.
National Museum of Natural History (RMNH) ,
Leiden, the Netherlands
H. van der Grouw of the RMNH, Leiden, located four
Kentish Plover specimens collected by Swinhoe prior to
1870 in this collection, and photographed these on our
behalf. Of these, two collected at Amoy in April 1861
belong with ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and are included in
Appendix 1 . The remaining two specimens are ‘eastern’
Kentish Plover.
Other collections
PDR examined the collections held at the Thai Natural
History Museum, and the Thailand Institute of Scientific
and Technological Research, but was unable to locate
any specimens amongst the Kentish and Malaysian
Plovers. In addition, the following collections responded
to our request for information, but appear not to hold any
relevant Swinhoe specimens: American Museum of
Natural History, New York, U.S.A.; Museum fur
Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany; Manchester Museum,
England; and Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia,
U.S.A.
WHAT IS ‘SWINHOE’S dealbatus ’?
The conflicting appearance of these plovers from within
the type locality, together with what appeared to be
temporal separation of pale and dark birds, suggested
that the bird hitherto recognised as Charadrius alexandrinus
dealbatus could actually comprise two taxa. To establish
whether the paler birds really were ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’,
reference was made to Swinhoe’s original source material,
plus his published works, and examination of the specimen
designated as the type of dealbatus.
Swinhoe clearly recognised that two forms of Kentish
Plover were occurring along the coast of southern China.
Prior to formally describing these pale-backed plovers,
Swinhoe (1863) commented that
the birds that stay to breed along the coasts and
islands of South China and Formosa can at once
be recognised by their flesh-coloured legs, which
in the arrivals from the north are leaden. Our
southern birds are, moreover, larger, very pale, in
some cases almost white, and never, to my
knowledge, attain aught but an indication of the
bright rufous and black that adorn the head of the
northern form.
Shortly thereafter, Swinhoe (1870) published a short
paper in Ibis entitled ‘ On the Plovers of the genus JEgialites
found in China ’ in which he formally recognised these
paler plovers as distinct from ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover
[then Aegialites cantianus\ , and which he named Aegialites
dealbatus. Swinhoe (1870) also included the following
description of dealbatus which supplemented the details
which previously appeared in Swinhoe (1863) with the
following description:
Bill black, with an ochraceous-yellow spot at base
of lower mandible. Legs light yellowish-brown or
flesh colour. In other respects like a washed out
/Eg. cantianus... The male in summer plumage
always has the latero-pectoral patch more or less
black, as also the band over the white forehead.
The loral streak sometimes shows in pale rufescent-
brown, sometimes in black spots, and is rarely
entirely wanting. The crown has generally some
rufescence; and a rufescent tinge often washes over
the back. . . The female in July has a slight rufescence
on the head, and a rufescent brown breast-patch.
She seldom acquires any of the dark markings of
the male.
At the time, Swinhoe would have been extremely
familiar with Kentish Plover, which he described in the
1870 paper as ‘coming down the Chinese coast in winter
in great numbers’, a statement that still holds true today.
Swinhoe’s conclusion was that dealbatus closely resembled
‘eastern’ Kentish Plover and he appears to have been
readily able to distinguish the two taxa. Despite this, he
noted that ‘the legs and the bill afford the only reliable
characters for discrimination’, but then commented that
‘in some specimens of true^Bg. cantianus I notice a paleness
at the base of the lower mandible, and also in some a
paleness of the tarse [sic], both of which by a little
intensifying would produce the results characterizing our
species’.
Swinhoe’s ability to distinguish between these two
taxa did not extend to his contemporaries. When
Swinhoe’s specimens were distributed into various
collections, new labels were added that, in some cases,
clouded the clarity which Swinhoe provided. For example,
Seebohm correctly relabelled 12 of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’
specimens (as Charadrius cantianus dealbatus ), but also
misidentified five ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers, which he also
labelled dealbatus. Similarly, Hume correctly relabelled
two of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ specimens, but mislabelled
an ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover as dealbatus.
66
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Selection of a lectotype and identification of the
type series
Little more appears to have been published until Sharpe
(1896a) provided a detailed description of the bird he
considered to be Charadrius cantianus dealbatus. In this,
he described the upperparts of the male as ‘general colour
above pale earthy brown, with faint remains of paler
margins to feathers’, while the crown was described as
‘ash-brown, washed with light tawny-rufous, especially
distinct towards the nape’. He considered the ‘forehead
and a distinct eyebrow white, with a broad black band
separating the white of the forehead from the brown of
the crown; eyelid and loral streak black; feathers below
the eye and sides of face white, with a black patch on the
hinder ear-coverts; cheeks and under surface of body
pure white, with a patch of black on each side of the
chest’. Sharpe also described the female as appearing
‘similar to the male, but with less rufous on the head, this
being represented by a tinge over the eye and round the
nape, the black band on the fore part of the crown absent,
the black patch on each side of the chest represented by
a brown patch with a rufous tinge.’
The above description, which mentions these birds
showing a black loral streak, suggests that Sharpe may
have included some male ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover, perhaps
incorrectly labelled as dealbatus , within the series he was
examining. Nevertheless, this was followed by a discussion
in which Sharpe stated that
I do not see any advantage in upholding /Egialites
dealbatus , which is supposed to differ by its paler
legs. While admitting that most of the Chinese
birds differ in this way, there are many birds, also
from China, which have dark legs like the ordinary
typical form, while it is equally certain that birds
from other localities also have pale legs. In one
instance I have seen a bird that had one dark leg
and one pale one, so that apparently the skin of the
leg dries in different colours.
As Swinhoe did not select a particular specimen to
represent the type of Aegialites dealbatus , there is no specific
type locality as such. Consequently, the type locality
becomes the entire range of the species as defined by
Swinhoe, i.e. ‘the South coast of China, including Formosa
and Hainan’. Sharpe (1896b), with access to these same
specimens (including the incorrectly labelled specimens),
selected a specimen (BMNH 1 896.7. 1 .559), to represent
the type of Aegialites dealbatus , which is retained in NHM,
and carries three labels. The first is in the handwriting of
Robert Swinhoe, who collected the bird at Amoy in May
1861, and bears the name Hiaticula nivosa, Cass., but
which has been subsequently changed, apparently in
Swinhoe’s hand, to Hiaticula dealbata and noted as a female
(although plumage characters suggest it to be an abraded
male) . This specimen later entered the collection of Henry
Seebohm, who added a second label using the name
Charadrius cantianus dealbatus. The third label, added by
NHM when Seebohm’s specimens came to the collection
shows this be the lectotype of Aegialitis dealbatus.
In selecting the lectotype from Swinhoe’s specimens,
Sharpe (1896a, b) neglected to provide a description of
this specimen. In these circumstances, Warren (1966)
stated that the ‘listing of a syntype as “the Type”, as was
often done in the Catalogue of Birds (BM 1874-1898),
does not constitute its designation as lectotype; nor of
course does its listing in the present work’. Thus, Warren
Plate 1. Lectotype of Aegialites [ Charadrius ( alexandrinus )] dealbatus
held in NHM, Tring, (BMNH 96.7.1.559), collected by Robert Swinhoe
at Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian province, China] in May 1 86 1 . In all plumages,
this taxon is characterised by its pale legs and pale base to the lower
mandible, larger, heavier bill structure, significantly paler upperparts
and longer and more conspicuous wing bar, particularly across the
inner primaries, than Kentish Plover. (Peter Kennerley © NHM, Tring)
argued that 1896.7.1.559 cannot be the lectotype of
dealbatus as it is not accompanied by a description. To
date, therefore, a lectotype of dealbatus as defined by
Warren (1966) has not been designated. In order to fix
the identity of Aegialites [ Charadrius ] dealbatus, a lectotype
must be selected from the material which Swinhoe had
available when he described dealbatus. The selection of a
lectotype is necessary because dealbatus is presently
represented by a composite series comprising two distinct
taxa. There are 15 specimens of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ in
NHM, Tring, together with 21 ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers,
all collected by Swinhoe from the coast of south China
and Hainan on dates prior to 1870 (i.e. the material that
Swinhoe would have had available to him when describing
dealbatus). From these specimens, we hereby designate
BMNH 1896.7.1.559 as the lectotype of Aegialites
[ Charadrius \ dealbatus (Plate 1). Support for this decision
is provided by reference to the characters which Swinhoe
(1863, 1870) used to describe Aegialites dealbatus , and
which apply to this specimen.
The 14 remaining specimens of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus’’
together with the lectotype, plus a further 21 ‘eastern’
Kentish Plovers collected by Swinhoe prior to 1870 from
the type locality and held in NHM, Tring, form part of
the composite series and become, by default,
paralectotypes of Aegialites dealbatus. In addition, all
additional Swinhoe specimens collected prior to 1870,
including ten held in USNM, Washington, and the four
in the RMNH, Leiden, also become paralectotypes.
Appendix 2 provides details of all known paralectotypes
of Aegialites dealbatus and identifies those specimens that
are correctly assigned to ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and those
which are ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers, incorrectly placed
within this taxon. This list is not exhaustive, and others
may come to light in the future.
Description of the lectotype of Aegialites
[ Charadrius ] dealbatus
The lectotype (BMNH 1896.7.1.559) was collected at
Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian province, China] in May 1861 by
Robert Swinhoe, and is housed in the NHM, Tring.
Although the data on the label states that this specimen
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
67
was sexed as a female, plumage characters strongly suggest
this bird to be a male.
Slightly larger than Kentish Plover. Bill black with a
pale base to the lower mandible, appearing slightly longer
than that of Kentish Plover with prominent ‘culmenary
bulge’ at the tip. Tarsus and tibia rich tan-brown on
dried specimen. Toes dark brown. Claws black.
Forehead and supercilium white, lores white, sparsely
flecked with small, pale brown spotting. Ear-coverts
lightly washed pale greyish-brown. Fore-crown marked
with abroad, dark brown band. Crown pale sandy-brown,
becoming warm orange on the lower edge of the rear
crown. Collar white. Mantle and scapulars pale sandy-
brown with thin, dark brown shaft streaks and slightly
paler, narrow tips. Greater coverts pale greyish-brown,
slightly darker than the median coverts and broadly tipped
white. Median coverts pale greyish-brown lacking broad
white tips. Lesser coverts darkbrown, becoming darkest
towards the carpal bend. Primary coverts dark brown,
narrowly tipped white, and appearing as the darkest part
of the closed wing. Alula dark brown at the tip, paler
brown towards the base. Inner primaries (P1-P6) mid
brown with white panel on the basal half of the outer web,
becoming darker towards the tip, although each narrowly
tipped creamy-white. Outer primaries (P7-P10) dark
brown and unmarked but with creamy-white shafts.
Secondaries mid brown as the inner primaries, with
narrow white tips to the outermost, these tips becoming
progressively broader and whiter towards the body, and
extending along the outer web on the inner secondaries.
Tertials pale sandy-brown and heavily worn. Tail with
central two pairs of rectrices (T1-T2) dark brown,
becoming darker, colder brown towards the tip; this being
the darkest region of upperparts. Feather shafts blackish.
Rectrix T3 dull creamy-white at the base, becoming pale
grey-brown towards the tip, this being more extensive on
the outer web than the inner. The outer web also showed
a narrow white fringe extending along the feather to the
tip but there was no similar pale fringe along the inner
web. Fourth outer pair (T4) creamy-white apart from a
faint brown, lozenge-shaped spot near the tip of the inner
web. Outer two pairs ofrectrices (T5-T6) entirely creamy-
white and unmarked. Entire underparts from the chin
to the undertail-coverts white with a faint cream tinge,
and unmarked. Sides of the breast marked by small,
dark brown lateral breast patches, extending from the
carpal bend to the sides of the breast but not reaching
onto the breast. Wing 113 mm; tail 47 mm; tarsus 28.6
mm; bill length to feathering 18.5 mm.
Additional details, including descriptions of other
known plumages and features which define the distinctive
character of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' , are detailed in
Diagnosis (below).
Confusion between ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus'' and
eastern Kentish Plover
The status quo was maintained until Hartert and Jackson
(1915) undertook a review of the plovers comprising the
genera Charadrius , Aegialites and Eudromias, which they
combined into the single genus Charadrius. With
Swinhoe’s specimens of dealbatus available to them at
NHM, they realised that Sharpe’s (1896a) decision to
treat Kentish Plover as a monotypic species was unsound,
but they appear unaware that a ‘type’ specimen of dealbatus
had been selected by Sharpe (1896b). Even with this
series available to them, they apparently failed to
appreciate fully the differences between ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ and ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers. Furthermore,
they appear not to have referred to the original descriptions
provided by Swinhoe (1863, 1870), as the issue of leg
colour was still problematic. For example, Hartert and
Jackson commented that birds obtained by Alan Owston’s
collectors in Japan, which they believed to be dealbatus ,
were described on the specimen labels as showing black
legs. They did, however, recognise that the larger, stouter
bill of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ set it aside from ‘eastern’
Kentish Plover, and they considered this character to be
sufficiently distinctive to reinstate dealbatus as a race of
Kentish Plover, which they named Charadrius alexandrinus
dealbatus. It is surprising, however, that they did not
acknowledge the distinctive appearance of dealbatus, in
particular the paler upperparts and lack of a dark loral
line, as in the same article they used these same features
in the diagnosis of C. a. nivosus as a race of Kentish Plover.
This treatment of dealbatus, as being larger-billed but
otherwise very similar to the nominate race of Kentish
Plover, was followed by all subsequent authorities
throughout the twentieth century. At this point, Hartert
and Jackson also mistakenly included T aiwan, the Ryukyu
Islands and southern Japan within the range of dealbatus
when they wrote:
This form is resident in south China, Hainan,
Formosa, and the Riukiu (Loo-Choo) Islands, and
Japan at least as far north as Yokohama, where in
winter C. a. alexandrinus also occurs as well. In the
British Museum, a specimen from Amherst in
Burma; also a female from Zaidam in Central Asia
belongs to this race.
The treatment of dealbatus by Hartert and Jackson
(1915), which correctly described it as being larger-billed,
but erroneously concluded it to be otherwise very similar
to the nominate race of Kentish Plover, has become widely
accepted. Furthermore, the inclusion within its
distribution of extensive regions of eastern Asia from which
it is in fact unknown (there are no specimens or
substantiated reports from any of these countries or regions
mentioned above) has given rise to the misconception
that dealbatus is the widely occurring form of Kentish
Plover in eastern Asia. ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ then vanished
from the public perception, and subsequent taxonomists
and authors throughout the twentieth century overlooked
its distinctive appearance, assuming all ‘eastern’ Kentish
Plovers to be dealbatus.
Comments on additional specimens of ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus’’ in NHM
Following Hartert and Jackson’s (1915) treatment of
Kentish Plover, it appears that little attention was paid to
the separation of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and ‘eastern’
Kentish Plover, as there was little or no perceived
difference between the two taxa. So when further
specimens of what are clearly ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ were
registered at NHM, including eight specimens from the
Delacour and Jabouille Collection, taken at the former
French colony of Kouang-Tcheou-Wan [Zhanjiang,
Guangxi province, China] in 1932, and four collected
during the Franco-British second expedition to Indo-
China by Delacour and Lowe, mostly from Thuan An,
near Hue, Vietnam, in September (2), November 1925
(1), and April 1926 (1), all were correctly labelled as
68
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
dealbatus. However, with the four from Thuan An, but
not distinguished from them, are nine ‘eastern’ Kentish
Plovers, also labelled dealbatus and collected in November
1925. Consequently, the two taxa were included together
in museum trays without any attempt to separate the
pale-mantled and dark-mantled birds, resulting in
dealbatus becoming a composite comprising two taxa.
WHAT ARE EASTERN’
KENTISH PLOVERS?
If the name dealbatus can be applied only to those birds
matching the description given by Swinhoe, then the
darker-mantled, dark-legged Kentish Plovers that occur
in abundance along the coasts of East and South-East
Asia must be something else. In fact, these latter birds are
not readily separable from the nominate race of Kentish
Plover, although some individuals show a tendency
towards a larger and heavier bill, which can approach that
of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’.
When reviewing the extensive material available from
East Asia in the US National Museum, Deignan (1941)
remarked that he ‘arrived at conclusions rather at variance
with those of the most recent revisers’. He commented
that ‘A good series from Amoy (June, July) are decidedly
paler than birds from Europe, have a longer and more
massive bill, and in every case have the upperparts suffused
with rufous. Swinhoe’s description of dealbatus as a
“washed out”, rufescent tinged alexandrinus fits these
specimens perfectly’. He goes on to note that ‘Another
series of badly worn birds from Chihli (July) are probably
dealbatus. In addition, I have seen examples of this race
from Hong Kong (October, November), and Hainan
(March)’. Outside China, he commented that ‘Two birds
from Thailand (November, March) and two from Malaya
(December), all in winter dress, are so remarkably pale
above that they stand out from all other Old World
specimens I have seen and can be fairly compared with
nivosus and tenuirostris of the New World’.
It seems clear that what Deignan had discovered was
a series of specimens that matched ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’.
Deignan then compared these paler specimens with a
series of birds from breeding locations in Japan, which he
described as having ‘the upperparts without the least
rufescent wash and quite as dark as European specimens,
but differ from the latter in having the bill as long and as
massive as dealbatus ’, although this statement is not
quantified or supported by measurements. Deignan
proposed the name Charadrius alexandrinus nihonensis for
the Kentish Plovers featuring this larger, heavier bill
structure, with an adult male selected as the type specimen
(USNM 95938), taken at Aomori, Hondo [Honshu], on
23 April 1876 by Captain T. W. Blakiston. We have
examined photographs of the type specimen of nihonensis
(Plate 2) and can confirm that it is a dark-mantled, dark¬
legged male Kentish Plover in breeding plumage, and
closely resembles the nominate form, other than its
marginally larger bill.
Deignan also noted, however, that birds taken in China
to the north of the range of dealbatus are ‘dark backed and
have a bill somewhat smaller than nihonensis but
nevertheless larger than alexandrinus ’. While recognising
there is substantial variation in bill size in Kentish Plover,
and also that young birds tend to have smaller bills than
Plate 2. Type specimen of Charadrius alexandrinus nihonensis described
by Deignan (1941), and held in US National Museum, Washington
DC, USA (USNM 95938), collected by Captain T. W. Blakiston at
Aomori, Hondo [Honshu], Japan, on 23 April 1876. Birds assigned to
this form closely resemble the nominate race of Kentish Plover but are
distinguished by a slightly heavier bill structure, marginally darker
upperparts and a richer cinnamon-orange crown. (Brian Schmidt
© USNM, Washington DC)
their parents, Deignan concluded that ‘even the shortest
billed examples from the Pacific coasts of Asia have the
bill rather more massive than European birds of the
corresponding age and sex — a difference that must be
seen to be appreciated — and are thus better called
nihonensis ’.
Comments by Nechaev (1988), who examined Kentish
Plover specimens collected during the breeding season
from all parts of the territory of the former Soviet Union
(FSU), support Deignan’s findings. Nechaev concluded
that nominate alexandrinus occupied the breeding range
of Kentish Plover throughout the FSU, with the exception
of Sakhalin, and Kunashir and Moneron in the southern
Kuril Islands. Here, he established that breeding birds
differed from nominate alexandrinus in their larger bill
structure, and, to a lesser extent, longer wing length. He
considered the Sakhalin and Kuril birds to be otherwise
identical in appearance to the nominate form and
concluded they belonged to the race dealbatus. In fact,
these slightly larger birds fit the description of C. a.
nihonensis , which was (and mistakenly still is) treated as
a synonym of dealbatus. Nechaev also recognized that the
Kentish Plovers breeding in the southeast Russian region
of Primorsky, bordering the Sea of Japan, had a bill
structure that was, on average, slightly smaller than that
of the birds breeding on Sakhalin and Kunashir, but
marginally larger than that of nominate alexandrinus from
elsewhere in the FSU. This suggests that an imperceptible
change from nihonensis to alexandrinus occurs in this region
but there is no convenient geographic division which
separates the two races.
Deignan (1941) went largely unnoticed, and was
certainly overlooked by those familiar with Kentish Plover
in Asia, who continued to refer to ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers
as dealbatus. All recent accounts of Kentish Plover have
incorrectly treated nihonensis as a junior synonym of
dealbatus. Other than bill structure, there are additional
minor differences that set nihonensis apart from nominate
alexandrinus , although it is not known to what extent the
intermediate populations on the adjacent mainland also
exhibit these characters. It is marginally darker on the
upperparts and, most conspicuously, the males display a
Forkrail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
69
dark, rich cinnamon-orange crown that nominate birds
rarely approach. In addition, ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover
shows a greater tendency towards displaying a narrow
but complete breast-band across the upper breast,
particularly in females (and males in non-breeding
plumage?), a feature rarely encountered in nominate
alexandrinus (Chandler and Shirihai 1995, Leader 2001).
Outside the breeding season, it is uncertain which
races of Kentish Plover occur in South-East Asia. It seems
probable that birds breeding over an extensive region of
northern Asia, and probably within the range of nominate
alexandrinus , may be occurring alongside larger-billed
birds resembling nihonensis from the east of the range. In
juvenile, first-winter and adult non-breeding plumages,
however, separation of the races of Kentish Plover using
bill structure alone has proved impossible. Although a
small minority of Kentish Plovers wintering in South-
East Asia, including birds observed in the field and
specimens from this region examined in museum
collections, do appear to differ from Kentish Plovers
occurring to the west, many are identical and only an
insignificant minority are slightly larger-billed; and there
is no way to establish their place of origin.
ETYMOLOGY
The species was named Aegialites dealbatus by Swinhoe.
Species previously forming the genus Aegialites , which is
no longer recognised, are now included within Charadrius.
The genus name Charadrius is believed to have its origin
in the ancient Greek word kharadrios meaning ‘a nocturnal
waterbird’, while dealbatus is derived from the Latin verb
dealbare, meaning ‘to whiten’. This was presumably the
term which Swinhoe thought best described the pallid
appearance of this plover when compared with the Kentish
Plovers with which he was familiar.
DIAGNOSIS OF ‘SWINHOE’S dealbatus ’
Size and structure
Similar in size to migratory forms of Kentish Plover
occurring in Asia, but slightly and consistently larger and
heavier-bodied. In addition, the head appears
proportionately larger than that of Kentish Plover and
this, together with the more substantial bill structure,
gives the head a robust and heavier appearance. In this
respect, the bill structure and head shape of dealbatus
appear closer to that of the slightly larger Lesser Sand
Plover C. mongolus than to Kentish Plover. In addition,
the tibia appears to be consistently longer than that of
Kentish Plover, but it has not been possible to substantiate
this by measurement from specimens.
To investigate possible structural differences, a series
of measurements was taken from specimens of ‘ Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’, Asian C. a. alexandrinus , C. a. seebohmi and C.
peronii (see legend in Table 1 for details).
Although there is extensive overlap with Kentish Plover
on all measurements, these demonstrate that ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ is, on average, slightly longer-winged and longer-
legged, and also that it consistently shows a slightly larger,
heavier bill than Kentish Plover (Table 1). These
apparently minor structural differences can be surprisingly
apparent in the field where, in particular, the bill structure
of dealbatus appears more massive and blunt-tipped, and
more parallel-edged and ‘tubular’ in shape than that of
Kentish Plover. In dealbatus , the ratio of ‘nail’ length to
exposed culmen length has a mean value of 0.49, compared
with mean values of 0.47 in ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover, 0.43
in C. a. seebohmi and 0 . 5 1 in C. peronii (Table 1 ) . Although
these mean values are quite similar, when viewed on birds
in the field, they translate to the short, stubby appearance
to the bill of Malaysian Plover and to the short and
relatively slender bill of C. a. seebohmi. Even between
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover the
visible difference can be striking. This feature is
particularly noticeable when the bird turns slightly away
from the observer, fore-shortening the bill length.
Plumage
All birds observed, and the specimens examined to date,
have been on dates ranging between late September and
mid-July. Criteria used to establish ages referred to below
are those used to age and sex similar Charadrius plovers,
as described by Prater et al. (1977). Body moult occurs
from late December to early February, and during this
period birds appear transitional in appearance, between
presumed first-winter and first-summer breeding
plumages described below. A selection of images that
illustrate a wider range of plumages than appear here can
be found in Bakewell and Kennerley (2007, 2008).
Table 1. Comparison of wing and tarsus length, and bill structure taken from specimens atNHM, Tring, of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus’ , Kentish Plover
C. a. alexandrinus from locations in East and South-East Asia, Kentish Plover C. a. seebohmi from Sri Lanka and Malaysian Plover C. peronii from
locations throughout South-East Asia. Measurements of sexes are combined. Wing length (maximum chord) was measured to nearest mm, with
measurements of tarsus and bill structure taken to nearest 0. 1 mm. The term ‘nail’ here refers to the dertrum, this being the ‘culmenary bulge’
or distal bill swelling found on the upper mandible. Nail length is defined as the distance from the bill tip to the point where the ‘culmenary bulge’
meets the culmen, and nail depth is the maximum bill depth measured over the ‘culmenary bulge’. Figures in parentheses represent limits,
standard deviation and sample size.
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ C. a. alexandrinus C. a. seebohmi
C. peronii
Wing
Tarsus
Bill length (to skull)
Bill length (to feathering)
‘Nail’ length
Bill depth at ‘nail’
Bill width at feathering
Mean ‘nail’ length/bill
length to feathering
113.1 (105-121; 3.20; 32)
28.2(25.6-29.7; 0.87; 32)
23.7(21.1-25.7; 1.07; 32)
17.8(16.4-19.5; 0.87; 31)
8.8(8.1-10.2; 0.50; 32)
3. 8(3. 4-4.4; 0.24; 30)
4.9(44-5.6; 0.39; 29)
0.49
111.7(104-117; 3.05; 101)
27.2(24.6-29.4; 1.30; 97)
22.3(19.5-24.4; 1.02; 101)
16.5(14.1 18.7; 1.16; 100)
8. 0(6. 2-9. 5; 2.14; 94)
3. 6(3. 0-4.0; 0.57; 91)
4.7(3. 7-5. 6; 0.34; 94)
0.47
101.4(96-106; 3.13; 10)
26.2(24.9-26.8; 0.74; 10)
19.5(18.8-20.7; 0.60; 9)
15.0(14.1-15.9; 0.76; 9)
6. 5(5. 7-6. 7; 0.34; 9)
34(2.8-3.4; 0.21; 9)
4. 3(3. 8-4. 8; 0.31; 10)
0.43
98.8(94-102; 2.28; 41)
28.8(26.0-31.0; 1.29; 40)
20.8(19.4-22.8; 0.81; 40)
15.0(13.7-16.8; 0.55; 40)
7.4(6. 5-8.0; 0.31; 40)
3.8(3.4-44; 0.19; 38)
4. 9(4. 3-5. 6; 0.28; 39)
0.51
70
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
L Jt_l ...... i. ■ ... . ... _ ... * .
Plate 3. Adult male Charadrius [alexandrinus] dealbatus, breeding
plumage (early February onwards), T anjungTokong, Penang, Malaysia,
6 February 2007. (David Bakewell)
plumage (early February onwards), T anjung Tokong, Penang, Malaysia,
6 February 2007. (David Bakewell)
Plate 4. Presumed first-winter male Charadrius [ alexandrinus ] dealbatus
(October to late December), Tanjung Tokong, Penang, Malaysia, 24
November 2007. (David Bakewell)
Plate 7. Presumed adult female Charadrius [ alexandrinus ] dealbatus ,
non-breeding plumage (October to late December), Tanjung Tokong,
Penang, Malaysia, 21 November 2007. (David Bakewell)
Plate 5. Presumed first-summer male Charadrius [alexandrinus] Plate 8. Presumed juvenile Charadrius [alexandrinus] dealbatus, Karon
dealbatus , breeding plumage (early February onwards), Tanjung Beach, Phuket, Thailand, 15 November 2003. (Petteri Lehikoinen)
Tokong, Penang, Malaysia, 6 February 2007. (David Bakewell)
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
71
Wing and tail pattern
Both sexes share a similar wing and tail pattern, which
does not appear to differ with age. Although ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus’ shares with Kentish Plover a conspicuous white
wing-bar extending across the centre of the upperwing,
the overall upperwing colour and pattern differs
substantially. The upperwing-coverts (except the primary
coverts) are much paler than those of Kentish Plover and
therefore provide a greater contrast with the dark alula,
primary coverts and outer primaries than Kentish shows.
This pallid appearance is further enhanced by the
extension of white along the outer webs of the inner
primaries, which is longer than on Kentish, while on the
inner wing broad white tips to the greater coverts enhance
the wing-bar width towards the body, so that the wing-
bar appears both broader and more conspicuous when
compared to that of Kentish Plover.
Unlike Kentish Plover, the outer greater coverts and
the outer median coverts of dealbatus , which are also tipped
white, contrast against the sandy-brown lesser coverts
and slightly darker mid-brown, white-tipped inner primary
coverts to form a short, narrow bar which branches from
the greater coverts and curves towards the alula, but does
not reach the outer edge of the wing. In addition, fairly
broad and conspicuous white tips to the dark brown
secondaries create a third white bar in the wing, along the
trailing edge of the wing in flight.
Also visible in flight, the white in the tail appears more
conspicuous than that of Kentish Plover, with the outer
three pairs of rectrices being almost entirely white, and
only the inner two pairs being dark brown and lacking
white.
At rest, differences in the colour of the fringing to the
lesser and median coverts on the closed wing are apparent.
On Kentish Plover these fringes are buff-brown and show
subdued contrast with the feather centres, while on
dealbatus they are whitish and show a distinct contrast,
although this becomes less apparent with time as a result
of feather wear. This difference can also be apparent on
birds in flight, with the paler lesser and median coverts of
dealbatus contrasting with the darker brown marginal
coverts, and forming a noticeable dark bar along the
leading edge of the inner wing. In Kentish Plover, the
inner wing appears much darker and there is little or no
trace of the darker marginal covert-bar.
Adult male breeding plumage (early February
onwards). Plate 3
Pattern resembles male Kentish Plover, with white
forehead and supercilium, orange crown and dark lateral
breast-patches. Unlike Kentish Plover, the crown is purer,
brighter orange, the loral region and ear-coverts largely
or entirely white — although some birds do show scattered
darker feathering or a dark smudge immediately in front
of the eye, this being most conspicuous when worn but
occasionally visible on birds in fresh plumage in February.
Exceptionally, a male observed by DNB (February in
Singapore) showed a narrow, dark line extending from
the eye to the bill-base. The white forehead is broader
and more extensive than in Kentish Plover, so the dark
eye is isolated and surrounded by white feathering,
resembling Snowy Plover, and the supercilium is broader
and longer, with white extending well behind the eye.
The blackish frontal bar across the fore-crown is wider
than in male Kentish, and the crown bright orange rather
than dull orange. The nape is white, forming a complete
white collar separating the orange crown from the mantle,
whereas on Kentish a narrow brown line extending down
from the crown divides the white collar. The entire
upperparts, including the mantle, scapulars, wing-coverts
and tertials, are uniform pale sandy-brown, and clearly
paler than the corresponding darker, wet-sand tone to
the upperparts of Kentish Plover. The darker primaries
project slightly beyond the longest tertial. A conspicuous
blackish-brown patch on the side of the breast in front of
the carpal bend is narrower, smaller and shorter than the
equivalent patch on male Kentish Plover, resulting in the
extent of white between the breast-patches being
consistently wider than shown by Kentish Plover.
Otherwise, the entire underparts from chin to undertail-
coverts are white.
Presumed first- winter male non-breeding plumage
(October to late December). Plate 4
Resembles the adult male breeding plumage but the head
pattern is subdued, with the supercilium behind the eye
lightly washed diffuse grey, and light grey around and
below the lower edge of the eye, forming a dark ‘shadow’.
In front of the eye, this appears as a small grey spot, but
otherwise the lores remain white. The forehead is white,
but the dark fore-crown bar is largely obscured with whitish
tips, and appears pale grey. The crown is pale sandy-
brown like the mantle, but the sides to the crown and
hind-crown are dull orange-brown. The dark patches on
the sides of the breast appear slightly greyer and paler
than those of the breeding male.
Presumed first-summer male breeding plumage
(early February onwards). Plate 5
Similar to adult male in breeding plumage and some may
not be separable (e.g. see leg-flagged male in Bakewell
and Kennerley 2008, plate 1 1, which was aged as a first-
winter when trapped in October 2007). Other birds
assumed to be this age differ from the adult male in showing
a narrow and broken dark frontal bar on the fore-crown,
which in some individuals can be almost absent. The
crown is duller than bright orange of the adult, particular
towards the centre where it is usually similar in colour to
the mantle, but becoming brighter at the sides and across
the lower rear-crown. The lateral breast-patches are
usually smaller and less obvious than those of the adult
male, varying in colour between sandy-brown (as the
mantle) and dull blackish-brown, but at this age often
two age classes of feathers are present, creating a mottled
appearance to these patches. The replaced mantle and
scapulars are slightly warmer and darker than in the adult
male, and contrast with the retained, worn and paler
juvenile wing-coverts.
Adult female breeding plumage (early February
onwards). Plate 6
The overall appearance of the upperparts is consistently
paler than in Kentish Plover, while the crown and breast-
patches are sandy-brown with a fairly bright rufous or
orange wash, and recall female Malaysian Plover. It usually
lacks the entirely white-faced appearance of the male,
although the forehead and supercilium are white.
However, the lores and ear-coverts are pale sandy-brown
with a light rufous or orange wash, forming a distinct eye-
stripe. The crown is sandy-brown with a rufous or orange
72
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
wash, hooking down behind the supercilium to join the
eye-stripe behind eye. The nape is white, forming a
complete collar separating the crown from the pale sandy-
brown mantle. The entire upperparts are pale sandy-
brown as in the male, although indistinct dull chestnut-
brown fringes may be apparent on the scapulars, giving
them a slightly warmer and richer appearance compared
with the mantle. The lateral breast-patches are pale sandy-
brown with a rufous or orange wash, similar to the crown
colour or slightly duller and browner and, as in the male,
not as deep or extensive as on female Kentish Plover. The
entire underparts from chin to undertail-coverts are white,
and the extent of white between the two breast-patches
is consistently wider than shown by female Kentish Plover.
Presumed adult female non-breeding plumage
(October to late December). Plate 7
Differs from the adult female breeding plumage by its
lack of reddish-brown on the crown and breast-patches.
The extent of the loral line is variable; on some birds this
forms an indistinct sandy-brown line reaching to the bill,
while on others the loral region remains white or shows
an indistinct sandy-brown spot immediately in front of
the eye. The dark coloration on the ear-coverts is much
less extensive than shown by Kentish Plover, not extending
onto the lower ear-coverts. The upperparts including the
crown and mantle are uniform pale sandy-brown.
However, scapulars usually contrast with the paler-fringed
wing-coverts when visible.
Juvenile. Plate 8
Closely resembles the adult female in non-breeding
plumage but differs in appearance by the presence of
narrow but conspicuous pale fringes to the mantle and
scapulars, giving the upperparts a slightly scaled
appearance.
Bare parts
Legs: variable in colour. Adult males vary from dull mid¬
grey with a slight pinkish tinge to pale flesh, the legs
appearing darker on freshly moulted males in February
and March. The legs of adult females are distinctly paler
than those of most males, with grey tones almost or entirely
absent, and replaced with dull pink or flesh tone,
sometimes with a hint of ochre. Importantly, however,
the legs are invariably and conspicuously paler than the bill.
Only the most extreme Kentish Plover will occasionally
show leg colour approaching that of dealbatus, and no
dealbatus has been noted with legs approaching the dark
grey of Kentish Plover. Bill: in both sexes black, apart
from the base of the lower mandible which is yellowish-
brown, similar in pattern and colour of the lower mandible
of Malaysian Plover. Eye: black, and appearing
proportionately larger than the eye of Kentish Plover
Moult and wear
The moult strategy has not been studied in detail, but is
believed to be similar to that of Kentish Plover. All birds
appear to undertake a pre-breeding moult between
December and January, during which the distinctive
breeding plumage is acquired, although in second calendar
year birds the brighter tones of the breeding plumage may
be subdued. As no male specimens (collected between
May and July) show the distinctive orange cap seen in the
wintering areas, it is assumed that this abrades fairly
quickly to reveal the pale brown feather-bases, possibly as
early as May, when some small, dark feathering may appear
on the lores, very occasionally forming a solid loral line.
Following the breeding season, it is assumed that a
complete moult takes place although the timing for this
has not been established. What is currently uncertain is
why some birds wintering in Singapore and Malaysia adopt
a pale, nondescript plumage outside the breeding season,
while birds wintering in Vietnam retain the breeding
plumage throughout the winter months. It now seems
likely that at least some of these early-arriving birds in
nondescript plumage are first-winter birds, which moult
into a ‘first-summer’ plumage the following spring. This
would accord with other Asian Charadrius plovers, which
are either resident in the tropical regions or short-distance
migrants which retain the same ‘breeding’ plumage
throughout the year, including Malaysian Plover, Javan
Plover, Kentish Plover C. a. seebohmi and Little Ringed
Plover C. dubius of the south Asian form jerdoni. Further
observations should provide answers to these questions.
COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR TAXA
Kentish Plover
Migratory races of Kentish Plover are similar in size to
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’, but invariably show dark lores and
dark feathering around and behind the eye. In all
plumages, the upperparts of both sexes of Kentish Plover
are dull brown and appear considerably darker and
browner than dealbatus. Both sexes of Kentish Plover also
show larger and more extensive dark patches at the sides
of the breast, appearing wider and usually extending well
forward of the carpal bend, on some individuals even
meeting across the centre of the breast (Chandler and
Shirihai 1995, Leader 2001), particularly in ‘eastern’
Kentish Plovers. Another significant differentiating
character, particularly useful on birds in first-winter
plumage, is the extent of dark coloration on the lower ear-
coverts below and behind the eye, which is always greater
in Kentish Plover. Male Kentish Plovers in breeding
plumage display a dark frontal bar on the fore-crown but
this is usually narrower than that shown by ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus' , and the orange crown is slightly duller, more
subdued and shows a distinct cinnamon tone.
The resident race C. a. seebohmi occurring in Sri Lanka
and southern India is a distinctive taxon that is significantly
smaller than the northern migratory form of Kentish
Plover, overlapping in size with Javan and Malaysian
Plovers. Prior to the pre-breeding moult, males can show
restricted black feathering on the lores, with most birds
retaining a small patch of dark feathering immediately in
front of the eye or a narrow, dark line across the lores,
flecked with white feathering. Following the pre-breeding
moult, in late February, all males from a sample of over
80 observed in Sri Lanka showed a narrow but solid dark
line across the loral region. Compared with other races of
Kentish Plover, the head pattern of freshly moulted male
seebohmi is dull, subdued, poorly marked and without the
warm orange and cinnamon tones to the crown, resulting
in an appearance that is like a washed-out version of the
northern, migratory races. Female seebohmi are similar in
size to the males, but closely resemble female Kentish
Plovers of the nominate form, and so are darker than
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' .
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
73
Javan Plover
The appearance of Javan Plover is poorly documented,
but observations of breeding birds at the Muara Angke
reserve, on the western outskirts of Jakarta, Java, have
established that their appearance is quite different to that
of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’. In size, it is relatively small and
compact, and comparable in size to C. a. seebohmi. The
upperparts vary from dark brown to a paler dull sandy-
brown, similar in colour to ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover, while
males show a warm rufescent-brown wash to the lower
crown and rear of the supercilium, which extends back
over the ear-coverts where it drops slightly. Importantly,
the lores are entirely dark, the patches at the sides of the
breast are rufescent-brown, not black, and the legs are
dull greenish-grey.
Malaysian Plover
Malaysian Plover is a relatively small Charadrius plover
that overlaps in size with C. a. seebohmi and Javan Plover,
but is significantly smaller than ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and
the migratory races of Kentish Plover (Table 1). Bill
coloration and structure and upperwing pattern are
strikingly similar to ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’. It also shares
the dark fore-crown bar and bright orange crown, and
some males show entirely white and unmarked lores, and
appear uncannily like some male ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’.
In most, however, a narrow line of dark feathering extends
from the eye to the bill-base. Male Malaysian Plover always
shows a dark collar across the upper mantle, below the
white collar, that joins with the dark patches at the sides
of the breast. These patches are usually longer and deeper
on Malaysian Plover, and on some individuals can almost
meet across the breast. In addition, although the upperpart
feathering of both sexes of Malaysian Plover is paler than
shown by dealbatus and Kentish Plover, the feathers on
the mantle and scapulars show a broad, pale fringe with
a darker centre and a conspicuous dark shaft-streak, so
the upperparts lack the relatively uniform appearance of
dealbatus. Females more closely resemble female dealbatus,
but the smaller size and pattern to the mantle and scapulars
remain constant differences. There is a difference in the
crown coloration between female Malaysian Plover and
female ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus". Typically, female Malaysian
shows orange on the fore, rear and sides of the crown,
while the centre is sandy-brown, while female ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ shows an even sandy or orange-brown colour.
DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS
Accounts from the early decades of the twentieth century
described ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ as a common breeding
bird along the coast of eastern China from Hainan north
to Chihli [Hebei province] . But this statement is confused
by the belief at that time that all Kentish Plovers breeding
in coastal China were dealbatus, and not just those along
the south coast of China. For example, La T ouche (1931-
1934) described dealbatus as breeding ‘ in large numbers
both on the coast of South-East China and on those of Shantung
[Shandong province] and Chihli [Hebei province]’. He
also describes finding nests at Swatow Bay [Shantou,
Guangdong province], and near Amoy (within the type
locality of dealbatus ) but commented that he did not find
any nests at Chinwangtao (Qinhuangdao, Hebei
province] , although he had no doubt that it bred there, as
Wilder and Hubbard (1924) had described it as being
abundant at Peitaiho [Beidaihe, Hebei province] from
early April to early September. It is possible that La
T ouche’s description is an amalgamation of northern and
southern Chinese breeding birds, passage migrants and
wintering birds, based on the misconception of the
appearance of dealbatus and erroneous distribution
comments by Hartert and Jackson (1915), which included
Taiwan, the Ryukyu Islands and southern Japan north to
Honshu within its range.
An earlier account by Jones (1911) described Kentish
Plover as ‘one of the commonest breeding birds on the
sandy wastes which border the Yellow Sea and Gulf of
Pechili [Gulf of Bohai] in so many parts of Shantung
Promontory’. Jones clearly assumed these northern
breeders to be the same birds which La Touche found
breeding in Swatow, but he did not provide a description
of the birds he saw. Crucially, however, he did include the
comment that all Kentish Plovers here have black legs
and none was seen with pale legs. This strongly suggests
that the birds Jones was observing were ‘eastern’ Kentish
Plovers rather than ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' .
Outside the breeding season Swinhoe considered
dealbatus to be resident in south China, although there is
little evidence to support this. In fact, the only report
from south China to date outside the breeding season
relates to a female mentioned by Vaughan and Jones
(1913), who stated that one was obtained on mudflats at
Macao [Macau, China] on 30 January 1906, but provided
no supporting details. However, what is presumably this
specimen is held in NHM (BMNH 1910.5.2.57) and is
clearly referable to ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus' .
An unsubstantiated report was included in Seebohm
(1893), who referred to a female shot at Nagomagiri,
Choda, Okinawa in the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, on 9
February that showed ‘very pale legs’ . Based on this single
character, he considered this bird belonged with the
Chinese race Charadrius cantianus dealbatus. But without
additional supporting evidence, there is nothing here to
suggest that this was anything other than a Kentish Plover
with unusually pale legs. In fact, a female Kentish Plover,
also with pale legs that may possibly resemble Seebohm’s
bird, was photographed at Okinawa on 20 March 2002,
and can be seen at http://homepage2.nifty.com/stints/
ploveretc/kentishplv-awC.html
All specimens of Kentish Plover that we have examined
from northern China, Taiwan and Japan, together with
photographs of breeding birds taken in these countries
clearly establishes them as Kentish Plovers. While it is
possible, even likely, that ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ bred to
the north of Fujian province, we have not seen any evidence
to support this . Outside the breeding season, it is generally
believed that dealbatus ranges widely throughout coastal
East and South-East Asia. However, examination of
specimens and photographs from this region clearly shows
that all are Kentish Plovers, with the exception of those
listed below and in Appendix 1 .
With such apparent confusion in the historical
literature and museum specimens, it is unwise to assume
that any published distribution data relating to the range
of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ can be accurate unless supported
by specimens or photographs. In an attempt to establish
the true distribution, all specimens of Kentish Plover from
eastern Asia held at NHM, Tring, and the Raffles
Collection, University of Singapore, were examined.
74
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Although most were labelled dealbatus, the vast majority
were found to be ‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers. Only those
supported by specimens, photographs, field notes and
sketches are included in the country summaries below.
Appendix 1 details the location of all specimens which
have been identified as ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’, and these
are shown in Figure 1 .
In an attempt to gather additional distributional data,
Bakewell and Kennerley (2007) published a photo-essay
on the Surfbirds website (http://www.surfbirds.com/
Features/plovers 1 108/malayplovers.html). In addition to
bringing these birds to the attention of a larger audience,
this article included a review and comparison of those
characters considered to be most useful when separating
‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ from Kentish Plover. After
publication, several additional reports were received
involving birds seen and photographed in China, Vietnam,
Thailand and Singapore. These, together with specimens,
form the basis of the individual country summaries below.
China
Specimens examined are dated from the period spanning
April to July, which would be the likely breeding season.
These include 1 8 from Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian province] ,
one from Swatow [Shantou, Guangdong province] , nine
from Kouang-Tcheou-Wan [Zhanjiang, Guangxi
province] , plus four birds collected on Hainan in March,
which could also be breeding birds. In addition, there is
the specimen from Macao [Macau] dated 30 January
1906, representing the only winter record from China.
Recent reports from China depict what appears to be a
worn adult, photographed at Sanya, at the southern tip of
Hainan, on 12 July 2007 (see http://www.wwfchina.org/
birdgallery/showpic.shtm?id = 4 1 638 and http://
www.wwfchina.org/birdgallery/showpic. shtm?id=4 1 639),
while J. Wilkins (in litt. 2008) reported two birds at Sanya
on 19 May 2000. In addition, a photograph of a male at
Beihai, Guangxi, on 25 May 2005, appears at http://
www.wwfchina.org/birdgallery/showpic.shtm?id=9234.
Currently, Xiamen marks the northern limit of the
known range of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus although there are
no recent reports from there. There are also no reports
from Hong Kong, which lies approximately 500 km to the
south-west of Xiamen. Migrant shorebirds have been
studied extensively in Hong Kong since the late 1970s, and
the lack of recent reports suggests few, if any, occur there.
Vietnam
Four specimens collected at Thuan An, Hue, Central
Annam, Vietnam, during the Third Expedition to French
Indo-China, in September and November 1 925, and April
1926 (Delacour et al. 1928), are housed in the collection at
NHM. In addition, photographs show at least seven birds
at Phan Thiet, South Annam, on 27 December 2005 (B.
Anderson in litt. 2007) and at least nine were photographed
there on 20 November 2007 (H. Stamm in litt. 2008).
Thailand
We have examined one specimen from Thailand, collected
at Khao Sam Roi Yot, Prachuap Khiri Khan, on 8
November 1932 and housed in the USNM collection,
Washington DC. Following the publication of Bakewell
and Kennerley (2007), several reports supported by
photographic evidence were received. These include a
male photographed at Nopparat Thara Beach, north¬
west of Krabi, Krabi province, on 17 February 2003
(P. Backman in litt. 2008), followed by a flock of seven,
photographed at Karon Beach, Phuket, 15 November
2003 (P. Lehikoinen in litt. 2008) . In the Gulf of Thailand,
several reports have come from Laem Phak Bia, Phetchaburi,
Figure 1. Map showing location of all
documented occurrences of ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ Charadrius [ alexandrinus )
dealbatus up to April 2008.
Documented sightings (open circles)
have been reported from the following
locations: 1 Beihai, Guangxi province,
China; 2 Sanya, Hainan, China; 3 Phan
Thiet, Vietnam; 4 Laem Phak Bia,
Phetchaburi, Thailand; 5 Bang Berd
Bay, Patiu district, Chumphon,
Thailand; 6 Thai Muang Beach, near
PhangNga, Thailand; 7 Karon Beach,
Phuket, Thailand; 8 Nopparat Thara
Beach, Krabi, Thailand; 9 Ko Libong,
Trang, Thailand; 1 0 T anjung T okong,
Penang, Malaysia; 1 1 Kapar Power
Station, Selangor, Malaysia; 12 Tuas,
Singapore; 1 3 Changi Cove, Singapore.
14 Cemara, Jambi province, Sumatra.
Specimen records (solid circles) have
come from: A Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian
Province, China]; B Swatow [Shantou,
Guangdong province, China];
C Macau; D Kouang-Tcheou-Wan
[Zhanjiang, Guangxi province, China] ;
E Hainan, China; F Thuan An, Hue,
Vietnam; G Khao Sam Roi Yot,
Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand; H
Pulau Langkawi, Malaysia; I Batu,
Selangor, Malaysia.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
75
where R. Wardle (in litt. 2008) photographed a male on 29
January 2004. Next came a male in March 2007 (G. Bakker
and R. van der Vliet in litt. 2007) , followed by one, supported
by photographs, from S. Daengphayon and Somchai
Nimnuan on 1 5 December 2007 . Up to three birds remained
here until February 2008 (P. Ericsson, PDR, Pinit
Saengkaew, K. Sutasha, C.-J. Svensson, C. Thomas and D.
Walsh in litt. 2008) and at least one was still present on 23
March (V. Picken in litt. 2008). Other recent sightings from
Thailand include one at Bang Berd Bay, Patiu district,
Chumphon, east coast ofpeninsular Thailand, on 26 January
2008 (Smith Sutibut in litt. 2008), four at Thai Muang
Beach, Phang Nga area, south Thailand on 22 February
2008 (C. Thomas in litt. 2008), a male at Nopparat Thara
Beach, Rrabi, on 26 and 29 March 2008 (J. Buckens in litt.
2008) and a male at Ko Libong, Trang, on 6 and 7 April
2008 (Somchai Nimnuan and PDR).
Malaysia
We have located five specimens from Malaysia. Three
specimens, collected from Pulau Langkawi in the extreme
north-west of the country are housed in USNM,
Washington DC. Two were collected here on 1 December
1899 and the third was collected on 14 November 1963.
The remaining two specimens are held in the Raffles
Collection at the University of Singapore, and were collected
on 26 November 1906, and labelled Batu, Selangor,
Malaya. Although the location of Batu is uncertain, D.
Wells (in litt. 2007) comments that Batu refers to a ‘rock’
or ‘milestone’, and he had also attempted to locate this site.
Although he could not be certain, he considers it most
likely to refer to a location on the northern Selangor coast,
to the seaward side of Sungei Buloh, and to the north of
Jeram beach, where there is a large limestone outcrop.
The first recent record, supported by a field sketch,
was made by C. Rose who watched a bird in the roost at
Kapar Power Station, Selangor, in March 1993.
Observations by DNB during winter 2006-2007,
supported by photographs, established that a flock of up
to 1 2 birds wintered on an extensive land reclamation site
at Tanjung Tokong, Pulau Pinang. The first bird was
noted on 1 1 October 2006, after which numbers increased
to a peak of 1 2 in December, followed by a decline to five
in February, and the last bird was seen on 28 March
2007. The first returning bird was located on 2 1 September
2007, and up to six were present in January 2008.
Singapore
Up to four birds which spent the winter on the extensive
land reclamation site at Tuas, at the western extremity of
Singapore bordering the Straits of Malacca, from late
October 1993 to 14 March 1994, were described and
sketched by PRK. There were no further reports from
Singapore until J. Cheah (in litt. 2007) photographed two
males at Changi Cove, on 12 February 2007, and posted
images on his website (http://www.pbase.com/wkcheah/
kentish_plover) . A visit to this site on 8 February 2008
revealed eight birds, and at least 14 there on 17 February,
falling to three on 1 3 March and just one on 22 March 2008
(M. Kennewell, S. Cockayne and Wang Luan Keng in litt.
2008).
Sumatra, Indonesia
A male was trapped at Cemara, Jambi province, Sumatra
on 12 February 2008. (I. Londo/WCS in litt. 2008).
Breeding and wintering ranges
Based on the established identifications above, the
breeding range of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ remains uncertain.
There is no evidence to suggest that breeding occurs
outside the range given by Swinhoe, i.e. the south coast
of China including Hainan. But with no evidence of
passage through Hong Kong, breeding may no longer
occur in Guangdong or Fujian provinces. There is no
evidence to suggest that ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ has occurred
in Taiwan and observers there are unfamiliar with it (S.
Liao verbally 2007), contra Swinhoe (1863) who included
Formosa [Taiwan] within the range of dealbatus.
Outside the breeding season, recent photographic
evidence has established that ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus’’ winters
locally along the coast from southern Vietnam, through
the Gulf of Thailand and south along the west coast of the
Malay Peninsula to Singapore, and the east coast of
Sumatra, Indonesia. Undiscovered wintering sites may
exist along the sandier east coast of the Thai-Malay
Peninsula, and the underwatched coasts of Vietnam and
Sumatra may holder larger wintering populations.
HABITAT
Outside the breeding season, ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’
appears to show a distinct preference for coastal sites with
an open aspect, which it requires for roosting and feeding.
Natural sites such as the sandy spit at Laem Phak Bia,
Thailand, are favoured for both roosting and feeding,
and birds are present there throughout the day. Land
reclamation sites with a sandy substrate and little or no
emergent vegetation, such as Tuas and Changi Cove,
Singapore, are presumably unsuitable for feeding and are
used for roosting during the day. However, these birds
depart the site at dusk and return the following morning,
presumably to visit unknown feeding sites (DNB pers.
obs.). At Tanjung Tokong, Penang, Malaysia, the
preferred habitat was a fine sandy substrate, almost
completely devoid of vegetation, which was used as a
high tide roost for shorebirds. When not roosting, however,
these birds fed on the adjacent intertidal mudflats.
It seems likely that land reclamation sites represent a
suboptimal habitat, and observations in Thailand and
Malaysia show that ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ prefers sand
beaches to mudflats.
BEHAVIOUR AND ECOLOGY
At both Tanjung Tokong and Tuas, dealbatus usually
associated with Kentish Plovers when feeding and
roosting, although they tended to feed on harder, sandier
substrates, while Kentish Plovers would feed in softer
mud along tidal channels. During low tide at Tanjung
T okong, the mixed plover flock would feed on the tideline,
on or near an isolated sandbar in the middle of extensive
mudflats. On occasion, they were seen to hunt prey
(possibly crabs) in a manner typical of Greater Sand Plover
C. leschenaultii : head lowered, dashing rapidly across the
sand to seize the prey before it could retreat into its burrow.
P. Ericsson (in litt. 2008) also commented that at Laem
Phak Bia, Thailand, ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ seem to prefer
the more isolated sandy beaches also frequented by
Malaysian Plovers. One male observed for over an hour
76
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
was very aggressive and would promptly chase off any
Kentish Plover or Sanderling Calidris alba which
approached it too closely. When feeding, both ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ and Malaysian Plover are more active than
Kentish Plover, and often run almost non-stop while
foraging along the tide edge, where they have been
observed chasing down and eating small crabs (M.
Andrews in litt. 2008).
Differences in feeding posture may also be significant.
When feeding, Kentish Plover assumes a rather horizontal
stance, with the head held hunched into the ‘shoulders’.
In contrast, ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ often adopts a slightly
more upright stance, with more of the neck visible.
On the rising tide, feeding shorebirds at Tanjung
Tokong congregated in a loose mixed flock, prior to
roosting. As the mudflats were covered, the flock selected
the same roost site each day, with ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus'’
always preferring open areas devoid of vegetation and
with a sandier, drier substrate. Roosting occurred both
on the foreshore and on bare reclaimed land at the edge
of a construction site. When roosting, dealbatus showed
a propensity to sit on the sand, legs folded
beneath the body and head held low. Frequently, they
selected an area with larger stones and hollows into
which they could crouch and which would conceal them
wholly or in part. In contrast, while some Kentish Plovers
also roosted in this manner, they were as likely to roost
standing up. When disturbed at the roost, dealbatus
appeared more nervous and tended to run away fast from
the disturbance, whereas Kentish would adopt a peculiar
robotic mincing gait, not retreating as rapidly as ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’.
VOCALISATIONS
Our observations suggested that dealbatus is largely silent
during the non-breeding months. Three birds disturbed
by DNB on 19 January 2007, gave an alarm call as they
took flight, described as ‘a high-pitched tip , sometimes
tee ’, very similar to that of Kentish Plover. All vocalisations
heard were similar to those of Kentish Plovers and
markedly distinct from the more trilling calls of Malaysian
Plover. Like other Cliaradrius, it is likely that they will
have a ‘display song’ which is given on the breeding
grounds, but this has not yet been recorded.
CONSERVATION
With all recent reports coming from outside the breeding
season, it is unclear whether ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ faces
any immediate threats. With many coastal land
reclamation schemes in Asia, there would appear to be a
plentiful supply of suitable, albeit temporary, wintering
sites. Circumstances in the breeding areas are unknown.
But with massive coastal degradation occurring in coastal
southern China, it seems inevitable that breeding areas
must have been lost. Furthermore, if beaches are the
preferred habitat during the breeding season, these will
come under increasing pressure from China’s developing
tourist infrastructure, particularly in Hainan and Guangxi
provinces. The rapid and on-going destruction of much
of the coast of southern China does not bode well for the
long-term future.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Few birds can have had such a confused history as Aegialites
[ Charadrius \ dealbatus. It is remarkable that this rather
distinctive plover has been overlooked for so long in such
a well-watched region. Both Singapore and Malaysia
have a long history and strong tradition of bird-related
research, extending back almost two centuries to the
founding of Singapore. Similarly, it is surprising that this
plover has been overlooked for so long in Thailand, also
a centre for bird research and a popular destination for
visiting ornithologists and birders since the 1970s.
Undoubtedly, the close resemblance of ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ to ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover in non-breeding
plumage, and passing similarity to Malaysian Plover when
in breeding plumage, has contributed to this confusion
and masked its true status. Furthermore, its omission
from modern field guides has not encouraged observers
to question the appearance of those ‘funny’ Kentish
Plovers they have encountered.
What has become apparent from the above discussion
is that the taxon referred to here as ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’
has completely disappeared from the modern
ornithological literature, and its place taken by ‘eastern’
Kentish Plover. Consequently, the name dealbatus has
been erroneously applied to ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover by
almost all authorities and authors throughout much of
the twentieth century. Currently not a single taxonomic
authority, handbook or field guide recognises the
distinctive appearance of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’.
Based on comparisons of morphological, structural
and behavioural differences, ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ is
consistently diagnosable from Kentish and Malaysian
Plovers at all ages and in all plumages. At present, the
breeding ranges of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ and ‘eastern’
Kentish Plover in eastern China are believed to be
allopatric. However, contemporary accounts, including
that of La Touche (1931-1934), allude to the possibility
that the breeding ranges may have overlapped in north¬
east China, and further work is required to establish
whether this is the case. Research to investigate the
phylogenetic relationships of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ with
Kentish and Malaysian Plovers is currently proceeding
and the results will appear shortly.
It is hoped that the publication of this paper will rectify
these taxonomic, historical and nomenclatural errors and
reinstate ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ as the distinctive taxon
described here. If ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ proves to be a
valid species, it is recommended that the name Charadrius
dealbatus be reinstated with the English name White-faced
Plover applied for popular usage. Furthermore, it is also
recommended that the available name Charadrius
alexandrinus nihonensis be reinstated for the large-billed
‘eastern’ Kentish Plovers breeding in northern Japan,
Sakhalin and the southern Kuril Islands.
Finally, we repeat the appeal in Bakewell and
Kennerley (2007, 2008) for anyone with past or future
records and photographic evidence of ‘Swinhoe’s
dealbatus ’ to contact us, particularly from the period
spanning March-July, and from anywhere in China.
Note added in proof
On 7-9 June 2008, members from the Hong Kong and
Fujian Bird Watching Societies visited the Minjiang River
mouth near Fuzhou, Fujian province, China, where
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
77
several pairs of ‘Swinhoe’s dealbatus ’ were found to be
breeding (M. and P. Wong, and K. C. Lee in litt. 2008).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are particularly grateful to Geoff Carey, Richard Chandler,
Nigel Collar, John Howes, James Kennerley, Angus Lamont,
Paul Leader, Brian Small, Subaraj Rajathurai and David Wells for their
suggestions, comments, advice and enthusiasm during the preparation
of this paper. Our thanks also go to Robert Prys-Jones, Mark Adams
and Katrina Cook who kindly allowed access to the specimen collection
at NHM, Tring, to Alison Harding for locating many of the more
obscure references quoted, and to Chutammas Sukhontapatipak for
help in preparing the map. Robert Prys-Jones, Edward Dickinson and
Steven Gregory clarified nomenclatural issues associated with the selection
of a lectotype and the naming of dealbatus , and Mike Wilson provided
Russian reference details. Wang Luan Keng and Kelvin K. P. Lim, (Raffles
Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences,
Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore), kindly arranged
for the loan of specimens to NHM. Brian Schmidt (Smithsonian
Institution, Div. of Birds, Washington DC, USA), and Hein van der
Grouw (National Museum of Natural History, Leiden), kindly provided
images of Kentish Plover specimens collected by Swinhoe and held in
their respective collections. Without their help, the listing ofparalectotypes
would be incomplete. In addition, Margaret Hart and Mary LeCroy
(American Museum of Natural History, New York), Iris Heynen
(Museum fur Naturkunde, Berlin), Henry McGhee (Manchester
Museum) and Nathan H. Rice (Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia) responded to ourrequestsforinformation. Professor Tamas
Szekely and Clemens Kiipper from the Biodiversity Laboratory of the
University of Bath, and Dr Pat Lee, Department of Biological Sciences
Swansea University, recommended methods by which we could work
towards establishing the molecular phylogeny of these birds. Thanks also
go to Andy Birch who agreed to publish the earlier article on the Surfbirds
website (Bakewell and Kennerley 2007), which encouraged observers to
seek out these birds and submit their sightings to us.
In addition, we are extremely grateful to the many people mentioned
below who provided details of their observations, together with
comments and opinions, in response to our request for information,
with apologies to anyone inadvertently omitted. Singapore: Jonathan
Cheah provided details of his February 2007 sighting. Wang Luan
Keng (NUS), Ramakrishnan and Lin Yangchen (National Parks,
Singapore), together with Martin Kennewell and Simon Cockayne,
supplied details of sightings made at Changi Cove, and are also thanked
for their efforts to try to trap birds there. Malaysia: Chris Rose provided
details and a sketch of a bird at Kapar Power Station Ash Lagoons.
Associate Professor Shahrul Anuar bin Mohd Sah, School of Biological
Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, M. A. Muin, Unisains, Universiti
Sains Malaysia, and Hasnan Yusop, Director, Department of Wildlife
and National Parks, Pulau Pinang, are thanked for their help in attempts
to trap the birds at Tanjung Tokong. Indonesia: Iwan Londo/WCS
provided details and photographs of a male trapped at Cemara, Jambi
province, Sumatra. Thailand: Peter Backman, Garry Bakker, Johan
Buckens, Suchart Daengpayon, Peter Ericsson, Petteri Lehikoinen,
Somchai Nimnuan, Verity Picken, Pinit Saengkaew, Smith Sutibut,
Carl-Johan Svensson, Craig Thomas, Rinse van der Vliet, David Walsh
and Robert Wardle provided details of their sightings, some dating
back to 2003. Vietnam: We thank Bjorn Anderson and Hanno Stamm
for providing details of sightings at Phan Thiet. China: John Wilkins
supplied details of his sighting at Sanya, Hainan. Bjorn Anderson and
Jesper Hornskov provided links to websites which included photographs
of Kentish Plovers, including breeding birds in China, and also shared
their opinions on these birds. We also thank an anonymous
correspondent in China who provided details of a bird photographed
at Beihai, Guangxi province. Others: Ed Keeble and Frederic Jiguet
commented on, and provided links to images of pale Kentish Plovers
photographed in the Middle East.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1969) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri
Lanka, Vol. 2. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Bakewell, D. N. and Kennerley, P. R. (2007) Malaysia’s mystery plover.
Available at http://www.surfbirds.com/Features/ploversll08/
malayplovers .html
Bakewell, D. N. and Kennerley, P. R. (2008) Field characteristics and
distribution of an overlooked Charadrius plover from South-East
Asia. BirdingASIA 9: 46-57.
Brazil, M. A. (1991) The birds of Japan. London: Christopher Helm/
A&C Black.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.
Chandler, R. and Shirihai, H. (1995) Kentish Plovers with complete
breast-bands. Brit. Birds 88: 136-140.
Chasen, F. N. (1938) Vier neue Vogelrassen aus Malaysia. Orn.
Monatsber. 46: 5-7.
Cheng, T. H. ( 1 987) H synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing: Science
Press.
Clements, J. F. (2007) The Clements checklist of the birds of the world.
Sixth edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L., eds. (1983) The birds of the Western
Palearctic, Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deignan,H. G. (1941) Remarks on the Kentish Plovers oftheextreme
Orient, with separation of a new subspecies. J. Washington Acad.
Set. 31: 105-107.
Delacour, J., Jabouille, P. andLowe, W. P. (1928) Onthebirds collected
during the Third Expedition to French Indo-China. Ibis (12)5: 23-
51.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J., eds. (1996) Handbook of the birds
of the world, Vol. 3. Hoatzin to Auks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Dickinson, E. C., ed. (2003) The Hozvard and Moore complete checklist of
the birds of the world. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Hartert, E. and Jackson, A. C. (1915) Notes on some waders. Ibis (10)3:
526-534.
Hayman, P., Marchant, J. and Prater, T. ( 1 986) Shorebirds: an identification
guide to the waders of the world. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
Hoogerwerf, A. (1967) On the validity of Charadrius alexandrinus
javanicus Chasen and the occurrence of Charadrius alexandrinus
ruficapillus Temm. and of Charadrius peronii Schl. on Java and in
New Guinea. Philippine J. Sci. 95: 209-214.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated
checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental
Bird Club.
Jones, K. H. (19 1 1) On some birds observed in the vicinity of Wei Hai
Wei, north-east China. Ibis (9)5: 657-695.
La Touche, J. D. D. (1931-1934) A handbook of the birds of eastern
China, Vol. 2. London: Taylor and Francis.
Leader, P. J. (2001) Kentish Plovers with a complete breast-band. Brit.
Birds 94: 246-247.
Nechaev, V. A. (1988) [To the systematic of the Kentish Plover
( Charadrius alexandrinus ) (sic)]. Pp. 110-113 in Flint, V. E. and
Tomkovich,P. S. (eds.) [Waders in the USSR: distribution, biology
and conservation] . Papers from the Third Conference ‘Distribution,
biology and conservation of waders’, 29-30 October 1987. Moscow:
Nauka. (In Russian.)
78
PETER R. KENNERLEY et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Prater, A. J., Marchant, J. H. and Vuorinen, J. (1977) Guide to the
identification and ageing of Holarctic waders. BTO Field Guide 17.
Tring: British Trust for Ornithology.
Seebohm, H. (1893) Notes on the birds of the Loo-Choo Islands. Ibis
(6)5: 47-53.
Sharpe, R. B. (1896a) Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum , 24:
Part B . JEgialitis alexandrina: 275-282. London: Taylor and Francis.
Sharpe, R. B. (1896b) Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum, 24: Part
C. Addenda. JEgialitis alexandrina: 746. London: Taylor and Francis.
Swinhoe, R. (1863) Catalogue of the birds of China, with remarks
principally on their geographical distribution. Proc. Zool. Soc. London
1863: 259-339.
Swinhoe, R. (1870) On the plovers of the genus ZEgialites found in
China. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1870: 136-142.
Vaughan, R. E. and Jones, K. H. (1913) The birds of Hong Kong,
Macao and the W est River or Si Kiang in south-eastern China, with
special reference to their nidification and seasonal movements.
Part III. Ibis (10)1: 351-383.
Vaurie, C. (1965) The birds of the Palearctic fauna, Vol. 2. Non-
Passeriformes. London: Witherby.
Warren, R. L. M. (1966) Type-specimens of birds in the British Museum
(Natural History), Wo\. 1 . Non-passerines. London: British Museum
(Natural History).
Wells, D. R. (1999) The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Vol. 1 . Non¬
passerines. London: Academic Press.
Wilder, G. D. and Hubbard, H. W. (1924) List of the birds of Chihli
Province. J. North China Branch Roy. Asiatic Soc. 55: 156-240.
Peter Kennerley, 16 Coppice Close, Melton, Suffolk, U.K. IP12 1RX. Email: peterkennerley@onetel.net
David N. Bakewell, do Whimbrel Cottage, Wilby, Eye, Suffolk, U.K. IP21 5LE.
Philip D. Round, Regional Representative, The Wetland Trust and Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of
Science, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
APPENDIX 1
List of all known specimens of Charadrius [, alexandrinus \ dealbatus. Examined specimens are at NHM, Tring; USNM, Washington;
the National Museum of Natural History (RMNM), Leiden, and the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research at the National
University of Singapore, and identification verified. All locations denoted appear as written on the original collection labels. Note
that location names have changed as follows: Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian province, China]; Swatow [Shantou, Guangdong province,
China]; Kouang-Tcheou-Wan [Zhanjiang, Guangxi province, China]; Sam Roi Yot, Siam [Khao Sam Roi Yot, Prachuap Khiri
Khan, Thailand]; Pulo Lankawi [Pulau Langkawi, Malaysia].
Forktail 24 (2008)
Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia
79
APPENDIX 2
List of paralectotypes of Aegialites [Charadrius] dealbatus held at NHM, Tring; USNM, Washington DC, and the National
Museum of Natural History (RMNH), Leiden. All specimens were collected by Robert Swinhoe prior to 1870 from the type
locality (i.e. ‘the South coast of China, including Formosa and Hainan’), and form the basis of his recognition ot Aegialites dealbatus
as a distinct taxon (Swinhoe 1870). The lectotype (BMNH 1896.7. 1 .559) is marked with an asterisk. Due to past confusion, the
taxon dealbatus is a composite, comprising both Aegialites [ Charadrius ] dealbatus and Kentish Plover C. alexandrinus. This table
distinguishes between those specimens identified as Aegialites [Charadrius] dealbatus, listed here as dealbatus ; and those identified
as ‘eastern’ Kentish Plover, listed as alexandrinus. All locations denoted appear as written on the original collection labels. Note
that some location names have changed as follows: Amoy [Xiamen, Fujian province, China]; Talienwan [Dalian Bay, Liaoning
province, China] ; T akow, Formosa [Kaohsiung, T aiwan] . The location of Oseukeo cannot be traced but may be in T aiwan where
Robert Swinhoe lived from 1856 to 1866.
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 80-91
A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range,
central China
YANG LIU, ZHENG- WANG ZHANG, JIAN-QIANG LI, YU ZHANG, SHAN LU and
XIANG-FENG RUAN
The Dabie Shan (Dabie Mountains) range, straddling Henan, Hubei and Anhui provinces in central China, harbours a rich bird diversity,
representing a transition between Palaearctic and Oriental realms. Although historical information is available on the avifauna of this
region, no recent comprehensive bird survey has been carried out. In this paper we present a bird inventory study for the Dabie Shan range
based on ornithological surveys conducted between 2004 and 2006. We recorded 238 bird species during these surveys. Species of
conservation significance include Falcated Duck Anas falcata, Reeves’s Pheasant Syrmaticus reevesii, Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri, Fairy
Pitta Pitta nympha , and Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher Rhinomyias brunneata. Ten species are new records for the Dabie Shan range.
This region is notable as a transition zone, in that most winter visitors and migrants are Palaearctic and a large proportion of summer
breeders are Oriental species. It is also the northernmost part of the range of a number of subtropical breeders in China. The avifauna
is threatened by extensive habitat loss outside the protected areas of the range, and we discuss conservation recommendations for the
whole region.
INTRODUCTION
The Dabie Shan (Dabie Mountains) range (30°02/-
32°20/N 1 14°30'-1 17°05'E) lies in a transition zone
between the Palaearctic and Oriental regions in China,
and so is crucial to our understanding of biogeography of
the Chinese temperate and subtropical zones. The history
of ornithological study in the Dabie Shan range can be
traced back to the 1880s, when birds were collected by
western naturalists, including the type specimen of the
subspecies joretiana of Koklass Pheasant Pucrasia
macrolopha (Han 1991) and the northernmost record of
White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus (He et al.
2007). The first systematic checklist of birds of Henan
Province by Fu (1937) listed 213 species of birds found
in the region. After 1949, a number of wildlife surveys
were carried out in succession, including that of Zhou
(1960), who listed 81 species and subspecies of birds in
the northern slopes of the range. Ornithological research
has been carried out in Dongzhai National Nature Reserve
(NNR) for more than 40 years, and in the 1960s, under
the supervision of Cheng Tso-hsin, artificial nests were
used to attract birds. Zhang (1979, 1981) surveyed
Dongzhai and reported 213 species of birds, including
nine species new to the Dabie Shan; this was considered
to be the first complete list of birds of the region. Later
surveys focusing on the birds in other parts of the Dabie
Shan include those of Li (1986) in Tongbai county and
Wang (1983) in Anhui. A series of nature reserves around
the Dabie Shan range have been established since the
1980s and checklists of birds of the reserves (based mainly
on field records) have been published, such as those for
Jigong Shan NNR (Song 1994), Dongzhai NNR (Song
and Qu 1 996) and Liankang Shan NNR (Ye etal. 2002).
In this paper we present results from the first
comprehensive bird inventory study for the Dabie Shan
range, based on systematic surveys of ten sites conducted
between 2004 and 2006. Our survey contributes in three
ways. First, although information from previous bird
inventories is available, past surveys were relatively limited
in geographical scale, normally concentrated within a
single nature reserve, and no recent attempt has been
made to survey birds across the whole Dabie Shan range.
Second, we identified a need for the collection of
information on species of conservation concern to inform
reserve managers at the regional level, and to improve our
knowledge about the distribution of these species. The
third purpose of our investigation was to document the
avifauna of a few places which had received little or no
prior ornithological attention.
STUDY AREA AND METHODS
The Dabie Shan range lies across Henan, Hubei and
Anhui provinces in central China (Fig. 1), and is part of
the watershed between the Huaihe and Yangtze River
systems, with several large rivers originating here. The
highest peak (1,774 m) of the mountain range is located
in Huoshan County, Anhui Province. The climate is north
sub-tropical monsoon: humid and hot in the summer and
dry and cold during the winter. The average annual
temperature is 14.5°C, and annual rainfall c. 1,400 mm
(Liu and Wu 1994). Due to its geography and climate,
the Dabie Shan range harbours a rich diversity of flora
and fauna. The main vegetation types in this area are
plantations of bamboo, pine and chestnut trees. Secondary
Figure 1. Map showing the locations of survey sites around the Dabie
Shan range, China. Numbers correspond to the siteslisted in Table 1 .
Forktail 24 (2008)
A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China
81
Table 1. Survey sites in the Dabie Shan range, 2004-2006.
north-tropical evergreen broadleaf, and mixed deciduous
and coniferous forests remain in the core areas of nature
reserves and at high elevations.
During 2004-2006, ornithologists from Beijing
Normal University and their assistants from Dongzhai
NNR conducted bird surveys covering five nature reserves,
four unprotected forest farms and one artificial reservoir
in Henan, Hubei and Anhui Provinces (see Fig. 1 and
Table 1). Dongzhai NNR was the base for these studies,
and was surveyed every month from February 2004 to
December 2006. The other eight forest sites were visited
mainly during spring 2005 at the time when most residents
and summer breeders began to show courtship displays
and other breeding activity, allowing relatively easy
detection and identification of breeding individuals by
the surveyors. All surveys were carried out along line
transects or forest trails. Birds were identified through
calls and visually using binoculars. For each sighting,
species, number of individuals and microhabitat was
noted. Coordinates (latitude and longitude) and altitude
were recorded with a Garmin hand-held Global
Positioning System (GPS). Data on altitude allowed us
to calculate a rough elevation span for each species. Field
observations were supplemented by mist-netting at
Table 2. Species listed as occurring in the Dabie Shan range, but not detected in 2004-2006.
1 Status assigned according to the original sources. R: Resident, P: Passage, S: Summer breeder, W: Winter visitor, V: Vagrant
2 Sources. 1 : Zhang et al. (2002), 2: Niu et al. (2002), 3: Song and Qu (1996), 4: Zhang (1981), 5: Song (1994), 6: He et al. (2007), 7: Ye
et al. (2002).
3 International threat category and conservation status in China. IUCN Red List categories EN: Endangered, VU: Vulnerable; and Classes
I and II in the List of Wildlife under Chinese National Priority Protection.
82
YANG LIU ei al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Dongzhai NNR on 1 7-24 December 2004 and on 1 5-23
December 2006. At Shishankou Reservoir, the only large
wetland site within our study area, surveys were conducted
in mid-winter when the wintering congregation was at its
peak. Waterbirds were surveyed by total counts at several
counting stops along the bank. Sometimes we hired boats
to enter the core area of the reservoir to obtain better
views. The periods we spent at each site are shown in
Table 1.
All species recorded in the survey are listed in the
Appendix. For each species, we present its status in the
region, international and national threat category where
applicable, locations of records and altitudinal range
observed. Seasonal status is taken from the atlas in Cheng
(1987) and from MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000), except
for vagrants or those species whose range has been
expanded as explained in this paper. Threat categories
are taken from the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International
2008) and the List of Wildlife under Chinese National
Priority Protection (Zheng and Wang 1998). Some species
were not detected during our survey but are listed in the
checklists of the nature reserves of the region; these species
are listed in Table 2.
Nomenclature mainly follows Inskipp et al. (2001).
Scientific names are given only for those species not listed
in Table 2 or the Appendix.
Study sites
Tongbai Shan is located at the western end of the Dabie
Shan range. Most of the area studied is situated within
Tongbai County, Henan Province. On average 42% of
land is allocated to forestry, but most of this is plantation,
except for some secondary forest patches surviving at
inaccessible areas at high elevation. Tongbai Shan, whose
summit is Taibaiding (c. 1,1 40 m), is one of the sources
of the Huaihe River.
Zhonghua Shan Forestry Farm (FF) is situated at the
centre of the Dabie Shan range, in Guangshui City, Hubei
province. Most of the forest is conifer plantation.
Jigong Shan NNR, lies to the southwest of Xinyang
City, Henan Province, and borders Hubei Province. For
a long time, this reserve has been kept undisturbed as a
summer resort by local government and it therefore
harbours good secondary forest and a rich diversity of
plants.
Founded in 1956 as a forestry farm, Xianjuding lies
41 km northwest of Chengguan Town, Hubei Province.
Most of the forest here is coniferous plantation, dominated
by Pinus massoniana and Platycladus orientalis. Selective
logging is still in evidence in the foothills, although it is
said to contain areas of fully preserved secondary forest.
Dongzhai NNR is situated in Luoshan County, Henan
Province, on the northern slopes of the Dabie Shan. It is
designated as a nature reserve for the protection of forest
birds and their habitat. It has recently been identified as
an Important Bird Area (IBA) in the Southeast Chinese
Forests (F03) (BirdLife International 2004).
Shishankou Reservoir lies 1 8 km northeast of Dongzhai
NNR, Henan province. Some tributaries of the Huaihe
River drain into the reservoir. The reservoir serves as
both a flood control area and water supply for Xinyang
city.
Liankang Shan NNR is situated in the middle of the
Dabie Shan range at the border of Henan and Hubei
provinces. It is very wet in the summer, receives an annual
rainfall of 1,248 mm, and forms the watershed of the
Huaihe River and Yangtze River systems. The reserve
was accorded protection by the local government in 1 982
and was upgraded to a National Reserve in 2004.
Huangbai Shan FF is located in the southeastern comer
of Henan province, bordering Anhui and Hubei. There
are steep, rugged mountains in the southeast, the peak of
which is Jiufengjian (1,350 m). Here the artificial and
secondary forests are dominated by pine, fir and chestnut
trees, and bamboo.
Tianma Shan NNR is the largest nature reserve in the
Dabie Shan range, situated in southwestern Jinzhai
County, at the border of Anhui and Hubei Province.
Secondary forest amounts to 59% of the area of the reserve,
the rest being plantation. The summit, Tiantangzhai
(1,729 m), is the second highest peak of the Dabie Shan
range.
Yaoluoping NNR is situated in Yuexi County, Anhui
Province. It constitutes the main part of the Dabie Shan
range. Most peaks in the reserve are over 1,000 m. The
types of forest include north tropical evergreen broadleaf,
mixed deciduous and coniferous forest. Owing to the
1,600 mm annual precipitation, it is a key watershad for
the Huaihe River.
RESULTS
A total of 238 species were recorded during our survey
(see Appendix). Below, we give details of significant
records, defined as those that meet at least one of the
following criteria:
1. Globally threatened species listed by BirdLife
International (2008).
2. Records leading to substantial range extensions or
records of regular occurrence in the survey area for
species not listed in Cheng ( 1 987) or MacKinnon and
Phillipps (2000).
3. Vagrants far from their normal ranges (as described
by Cheng 1987 or MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000)
but recorded in our survey area once.
In addition, we discuss two highly endangered
species — White-eared Night Heron and Crested Ibis —
which were not recorded during the survey are known
from the region in the past.
Falcated Duck Huns falcata
Near Threatened. Four were recorded at Shishankou
Reservoir on 1 December 2004, and 10 on 5 January
2005. Our observations suggest the Falcated Duck is a
rare winter visitor in the region.
Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri
Endangered. Two were recorded at Shishankou Reservoir
on 3 December 2005. The global population of this species
has been declining in recent decades (BirdLife
International 2008) . It is probably a scarce and occasional
winter visitor to the region.
Reeves’s Pheasant Syrmaticus reevesii
Vulnerable. This species is listed as class II in the Chinese
National Protection Wildlife List (Zheng and Wang 1998).
Although the population has been shrinking in both size
and distribution range, and has become uncommon or
Forktail 24 (2008)
A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China
83
absent elsewhere in central and western China, the Dabie
Shan range still holds considerable numbers of this
Chinese endemic. Reeves’s Pheasant was regularly
recorded at all nine surveyed forest areas across the Dabie
Shan range. Non-breeding flocks consisting of females
and juveniles were frequently sighted in the winter. At
Baiyun Monitoring Station in Dongzhai NNR, we counted
1 3 individuals on 1 5 December 2004. Males are normally
not difficult to detect in spring, when their wing-whirring
display is very audible. The birds were observed between
100 m (Dongzhai) and 800 m (Yaoluoping), and thus at
lower altitudes than previously thought (400-2,600 m;
BirdLife International 2001). Since Reeves’s Pheasant
appears to depend heavily on natural forest (Sun et al.
2003), the replacement of natural vegetation with
commercial monoculture plantations in unprotected
forest farms is likely to be a major threat. Besides habitat
loss and alteration, poaching also gives cause for concern.
Hunted males were observed for sale alongside Common
Pheasant at a restaurant in Guangshui County, Hubei, in
spring 2006. Illegal traps were also found at Zhonghua
Shan Forest Farm and Xianjuding Forest Farm, indicating
that poaching does occur in some unprotected areas.
KOKLASS PHEASANT Pucrasia macrolopha
The subspecies joretiana of Koklass Pheasant, also known
as Joret’s Koklass Pheasant, was first collected and
described by Heude in Huoshan County within the Dabie
Shan range in 1883 (Han 1991). On 1 April 2005, feathers
of this species were found near Jilong monitoring station
(770 m), Dongzhai NNR. One and three females were
recorded at two transect lines (altitude of 900 m) at
Liankang Shan NNR on 3 and 5 April 2005 respectively.
A group of five was observed on 15 April 2005 at
Yaoluoping NNR (1,090 m). There were no records of
Koklass Pheasant at Jigong Shan, Xianjuding or Zhonghua
Shan, probably because of the lower elevation of those
sites. This species appears to be restricted to the higher
elevation of the eastern part of the Dabie Shan range,
with only slight overlap with the distribution of Reeves’s
Pheasant.
Crested Serpent Eagle Spilomis cheela
One adult flew north near Jinniuji (600 m), Zhonghua
Shan Forest Farm on 15 April 2005. This record is the
first for Hubei province. In February 2003 and January
2005, two and one birds were observed regularly in Foping
NNR, Qingling Mountains (YL pers. obs.), which is at
the same latitude as the Dabie Shan range. These
northernmost records may indicate a northward range
extension of this forest raptor.
BONELLI’S EAGLE Hieraaetus fasciatus
Two individuals were observed soaring at 400 m over
Xianjuding Forest Farm on 1 7 April 2005, the first record
for Hubei Province and a northwards range extension.
According to MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000), there are
records of vagrant birds in Hebei province. Another
northern record is from near Beijing (Cai 1987).
Grey-faced Buzzard Butastur indicus
Twenty-one individuals were observed flying north near
Jinniu Jian (Jian = peak; 600 m), Zhonghua Shan Forest
Farm on 14-15 April 2005 and three were also noted at
Dongzhai NNR on 4 May 2005. Another two birds were
regularly observed at Baiyun Monitoring Station
(31°56'48"N 1 14°15'44"E, 150 m) from 8 May 2005
onwards, and a newly fledged juvenile (presumably their
offspring) was recorded there on 30 June 2005, the first
breeding record for the Dabie Shan range. This provides
confirmation of a southern extension in breeding range,
although previous summering and display pairs have been
observed from Yao Shan, Guangxi province (Lewthwaite
1996).
White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus
Endangered. Recent surveys indicate that this enigmatic
nocturnal species is widespread than previously thought
(He et al. 2007), but the northernmost sub-population of
the Dabie Shan range remains poorly known (He et al.
2007). So far, only one record exists: of skins collected by
Pere Courtois on 1 1 May 1910 at ‘Manchoei-ho’
(Manshuihe, 31oll'20.6"N 1 16°00'30.5"E) near ‘Ho-
Shan’ (Huoshan), Anhui (He et al. 2007). Manshuihe is
only c.50 km north-west of the Tianmashan NNR. No
sign of this species was found by either our survey or a
separate survey focusing on this species (He et al. 2007).
Further surveys are required to ascertain whether this
species is truly absent from the Dabie Shan range, or
whether small population size and nocturnal habits have
led to the species going unrecorded for almost a century.
Crested Ibis Nipponia nippon
Endangered. The only known remaining population of
this species is in Yangxian County, Shaanxi Province.
The species is known historically from the Dabie Shan
region, which lies at the same latitude and has similar
climate and habitats as Y angxian County. Dongzhai NNR
was selected as a site for reintroduction of Crested Ibis by
the State Forestry Administration of China in 2005. Two
captive pairs were imported to Dongzhai and raised there
in 2006, and captive breeding and reintroduction is
planned in the future.
Fairy Pitta Pitta nympha
Vulnerable. Fairy Pitta is a rare migrant or summer breeder
in Southeast China (Cheng 1987, Zheng and Wang 1998).
It was reported that this species was uncommon in the
Dabie Shan range and neighbouring mountains in central
and southern Anhui Province (Fu 1937, Liu et al. 1996).
We noted single singing males at Baiyun Monitoring
Station (150 m), Dongzhai NNR, on 15 May 2004 and
12 May 2005, which were the earliest records of each
year. Up to eight territorial males were recorded here on
26 May 2005. Four of these were seen regularly, and
continued singing until late June. Two birds were also
heard near Lingshan Monitoring Station (31°53'29"N
1 14°05'12"E, 200 m) on 29 May 2005. This species has
been reported as a rare summer breeder at Jigong Shan
(Song 1994) and Liankang Shan NNR (Ye et al. 2002).
Fairy Pitta seems highly dependent on the lowland forest
in summer, but habitat use, ecology and life history in this
central Chinese population is generally poorly understood.
Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher
Rhinomyias brunneata
Vulnerable. A singing male was discovered and lured out
into view by playback by Jesper Hornskov near Baiyun
Monitoring Station (150 m), Dongzhai NNR on 26 May
2005 . Single singing males were found by YL at Lingshan
84
YANG LIU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
(200 m) and at Baiyun on 29 May and 5 June 2005
respectively. Thereafter, the last record was of one singing
male at another patch of woods at Baiyun on 25 June
2005 — possibly the same individual as one of those sighted
in May. The Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher is an
endemic summer breeder in the subtropical forests of
southeastern China in Anhui, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Zhejiang,
Fujian, Hunan, Guangdong, Guangxi and Guizhou
provinces (Cheng 1987, Lewthwaite 1996). MacKinnon
and Phillipps (2000) describe sporadic records in
evergreen broadleaf, bamboo, secondary or artificial forest
between 600 m and 1,200 m in altitude. Henan is not
included in its normal breeding range by Fu ( 1 937), Cheng
(1987) or MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000), although
Meyer de Schauensee ( 1 984) lists this species for Southern
Henan without giving details. We suppose that the reason
why no specimens were collected in past surveys is because
of the cryptic habit of this species, which makes it easily
overlooked. Dongzhai is around 400 km from the
previously known northernmost breeding sites of this
species, e.g. Huang Shan, Anhui (Wang 1983) and West
Tianmu Shan (China Ornithological Society 2005).
Despite the fact that we could not confirm the occurrence
of breeding, we suppose that this species is a rare summer
visitor to the Dabie Shan range; our records suggest a
northern extension to its breeding range.
‘ELISE’S Flycatcher’ Ficedula ( narcissina ) elisae
The distinctive race elisae of the Narcissus Flycatcher, is
sometimes given full species status, known as ‘Elise’s
Flycatcher’ Ficedula elisae (Robson 2005). This north¬
east China mountain breeder presumably winters in the
Thai-Malay Peninsula (Robson 2005). An adult male was
sighted at Baiyun Monitoring Station (150 m), Dongzhai
NNR, on 12 May 2005, but was not seen subsequently.
This is the first record of this taxon for Henan Province.
Very little is known about migration of this taxon and
records of migrants in central China are very rare.
Grey-headed Canary Flycatcher
Culicicapa ceylonensis
One was seen at Baiyun Monitoring Station (150 m),
Dongzhai NNR, on 1 1 August 2004 — a new record for
the Dabie Shan range and also a first record for Henan
Province. This species is a summer breeder or resident
from low- to mid-altitude forests in central and
southwestern China. Previous vagrant birds were only
sighted around Beidaihe (MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000)
Striated Prinina Prinia criniger
Three or four singing males were recorded in bushes near
the northeast edge of Shishankou Reservoir (60 m) on 28
May 2005 — the first record for Henan Province, and a
north-easterly range extension. Afterwards, they were
frequently observed around the reservoir. It is possible
that this species is regionally common in the lowlands of
the Dabie Shan range.
Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita
One was netted and ringed (Plate 1 ) in broadleaf forest at
Qilichong Monitoring Station (250 m), Dongzhai NNR,
on 23 December 2006, apparently the first record for
Henan Province. V agrant birds in winter in eastern China
have previously been reported only from Hong Kong
(Carey et al. 2001).
CHINESE Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus yunnanensis
Two were seen in broadleaf forest at Xianjuding Forest
Farm (450 m) on 17 April 2005, probably vagrants from
the breeding population in northern China. Although
this species possesses a large breeding range, including
the montane areas of Beijing, Hebei, Shanxi and Sichuan
(MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000), migration records in
central China are extremely scare.
Japanese Grosbeak Eophona personata
A flock of c.40 was recorded in a relatively open woodland
habitat, at Baiyun Monitoring Station (150m), Dongzhai
NNR, on 21 March 2006. This observation extends the
range of this species westwards, as this species was
previously known to winter only in eastern and south¬
eastern China (MacKinnon and Pillipps 2000).
Slaty Bunting Latoucheomis siemsseni
On 15 April 2005, a single male was observed at
Y aoluoping NNR (1,100m). It is possible that there is a
breeding population in the Dabie Shan range, but no
further evidence of breeding could be gathered. This is
the first record for Anhui Province, and probably indicates
a range extension to the east. The species was previously
known to breed only in the mountains of Sichuan and
Shaanxi (MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000).
DISCUSSION
Composition of the avifauna
Combining our field surveys and records from the
literature, a total of 261 species (238 species recorded
during the survey plus 23 recorded earlier) have been
recorded from the Dabie Shan range, c. 1 8% of the Chinese
avifauna. Among these are several globally threatened
species: Falcated Duck, Baer’s Pochard, Reeves’s
Pheasant, Fairy Pitta and Brown-chested Jungle
Flycatcher. Golden Eagle is ranked Class I in the List of
Wildlife under Chinese National Priority Protection and
28 other species are of Class II, including Koklass
Pheasant, Mandarin Duck, Eurasian Eagle Owl and
Plate 1. Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita at Qilichong
Monitoring Station (250 m), Dongzhai Nature Reserve on 23 December
2006. (Bo Xi.)
Forktail 24 (2008)
A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China
85
Bonelli’s Eagle (Zheng and Wang 1998). Our survey has
added ten taxa to the bird list of the Dabie Shan range.
They are: Crested Serpent Eagle, Bonelli’s Eagle, Brown¬
chested Jungle Flycatcher, Elise’s Flycatcher, Grey¬
headed Canary Flycatcher, Striated Prinia, Common
Chiffchaff, Chinese Leaf Warbler, Japanese Grosbeak
and Slaty Bunting.
The faunal composition suggests that the Dabie Shan
region represents a transition between the Palaearctic
and Oriental avifauna in China (Zhang 1999). Most winter
visitors and passage migrants are Palaearctic species,
whereas a large proportion of residents and summer
breeders are belong to the fauna of Oriental realm. The
Dabie Shan range appears to form the northeast boundary
of the summer range of several species: Speckled Piculet,
Blue-throated Bee-eater, Greater Coucal, Asian Barred
Owlet, Black Baza, Swinhoe’s Minivet, Orange-headed
Thrush, Japanese Thrush, Black Bulbul, Rufous-faced
Warbler and Slaty Bunting. Although there have been
previous sporadic records north of the Dabie Shan range
for some of these species, there is no evidence of regular
breeding in the north.
Twenty-three species listed in the published literature
on the Dabie Shan range or in checklists of nature reserves
were not recorded during our survey (Table 2). Their
absence during our survey does not prove their
disappearance. Several of the missing species are highly
wetland-dependent, and we surveyed only a single wetland
to any significant degree. Other species are rare and likely
easily overlooked. The occurrence of a few species on
these checklists (e.g., Swinhoe’s Egret and Barred Cuckoo
Dove) is doubtful. These would be far from their normal
ranges, and may have been wrongly identified.
Conservation
The Dabie Shan region faces a number of serious
conservation challenges. The region is home to a large
human population. Over the years the natural secondary
forests of the region have suffered owing to high demand
for timber and to reclamation for agriculture. Since the
1 980s, a total of five National Nature Reserves have been
established in the region, covering a total area of nearly
500 km2. The major purpose of these reserves is to protect
the forests and vegetation of the Chinese temperate and
north subtropical transition zone, and conserve
endangered birds like Reeves’s Pheasant and Fairy Pitta.
A dozen provincial reserves function as supplementary
protected areas. Shihankou Reservoir, Jigong Shan NNR
and Dongzhai NNR have recently been identified as
Important Bird Areas (IBA), with codes CN296, CN297
and CN298 respectively (BirdLife International 2004).
Legislation and management have brought about a
great reduction in logging in nature reserves and adjacent
areas. Under a programme aiming to protect natural
forests, launched by the Chinese State Forestry
Administration, natural forests, whether inside or outside
nature reserves, are controlled by local government.
Logging of forests has been stopped, with local government
compensating the forest manager or landlord.
Despite these conservation successes, threats through
habitat destruction remain common outside protected
areas. The poaching of birds — particularly pheasants —
for food and recreation frequently occurs. New nature
reserves need to be established to protect wildlife and its
habitats. In addition, management of the existing
protection areas must be strengthened: conservation
action plans should be reviewed, and managers should be
given greater powers to curb illegal hunting. The managers
of nature reserves should also consider increasing the
connectivity between adjoining nature reserves and forest
farms to promote habitat continuity. Avifaunal checklists
of these nature reserves require regular updating to identify
key species and their preferred habitat for protection.
We suggest that the Reeves’s Pheasant is an excellent
flagship or umbrella species under which such
conservation activities in the Dabie Shan range could
take place. This bird has been listed as one of the key
species in the Chinese Wildlife Protection Action Plan
(2001-2010) (Zhang etal. 2003), and has been proposed
to be upgraded to a higher protected classification (Zheng
and Wang 1998). Some of our survey areas like Huangbai
Shan, Xianju Ding and Tongbai Shan still hold
considerable numbers of this magnificent pheasant, and
this could be used to promote wildlife conservation and
ornithological research in the region. Baer’s Pochard is
another key species in the checklist of the Dabie Shan
range in terms of its global Endangered threat category.
However, we have only a single record, and so the
importance of the region for this species and other
threatened waterbirds is hard to evaluate. Further survey
efforts concentrated on waterbirds and wetlands of the
Dabie Shan range are needed to plug the current
knowledge gaps about these birds and habitats.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Jesper Hornskov for his kind assistance in fieldwork and in
writing this paper. The following people contributed to the fieldwork.
From Beijing Normal University, Lei Jinyu, Dong Lu, Sun Di and
Zhang Yongqiang; from Dongzhai NNR, Du Zhiyong, Wang Ke, Li
Fei and Yuan Dejun; from Jigong Shan NNR, Ha Denglong and Jing
Guangwei; from Xianjuding Forestry Farm, Yu Yonggao; from the
Forestry Bureau of Tobai County, Shi Kang; from Zhonghua Shan
Forestry Farm, Chen Wanjun. We are indebted to Zhu Jiagui, Gao
Zhenjian, Liang Guozhong and Xi Bo for their support with logistics.
We wish to acknowledge Richard Lewthwaite of the Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society for his help with of key literature on the birds of
Henan. We especially thank Heather Kightley for her kind help with
language and proofreading. Our thanks also go to three anonymous
referees for their insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
This work was funded by the National Administration of Forestry and
the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife
International.
BirdLife International (2004) Important bird areas of Asia: key sites for
conservation. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2008) Species factsheets. Available at http://
www.birdlife.org/datazone. Accessed on 17 June 2008.
Cai Qikan (1987) The avifauna of Beijing. Beijing: Beijing Science and
Technology Press.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, P. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Y oung, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.
86
YANG LIU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press.
China Ornithological Society. (2005) China bird report 2004. Beijing:
China Ornithological Society.
FuTung-sheng (1937) L’ etude des oiseaux duHo-N an [Birds of Henan).
Langres: Imprimerie Moderne. (In French.)
Han Demin (1991) [Koklass Pheasant]. Pp. 300-313 in [Endangered
pheasants in China], Lu Taichun, Liu Rusun and He Fenqi, eds.
Fuzhou: Fuzhou Science and Technology Press. (In Chinese.)
He Fenqi, Fellowes, J. R., Chan, B. P. L., Lau, M. W. N., Lin Jiansheng
and Lee K. S. (2007) An update on the distribution of the
‘Endangered’ White-eared Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus in
China. Bird Consent. Intemat. 17: 93-101.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (2001) Checklist of the
birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
Lewthwaite, R. W. (1996) Forest birds of southeast China: observation
during 1984- 1996. Hong Kong Bird Report 1995: 150-203.
Liu Peng and Wu Guofang (1994) [Study of flora characteristics and
forestry vegetation of the Dabie Mountains] . J. East China Normal
Univ. ( Nat.Sci .) 40:76-82. (In Chinese.)
Liu Xuyou, Gu Changming, Zheng Shilin and Wang Qishan (1996)
[Studies on breeding ecology of Blue-winged Pitta]. Pp. 325-329
in [Studies on Chinese ornithology], Zheng Guangmei, Zhang
Zhengwang, Yan Chongwei and Zeng Meili, eds. Beijing: China
Forestry Publishing House. (In Chinese.)
Li Yanjuan (1986) [Report of birds survey in Tongbaishan, Henan
Province.] J. Henan Normal Univ. 26: 73-83. (In Chinese.)
MacKinnon, J. and Phillipps, K. (2000) A field guide to the birds of
China. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. M. (1984) The birds of China. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Niu Hongxing, Lu Jiuquan and Lu Jiqi. (2002) [Survey on the
carnivorous birds in Henan Province], Chinese J. Zool. 37: 36-38.
(In Chinese.)
Robson, C. (2005) Field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland.
Song Chaoshu, ed. (1994) [Scientific survey of the Jigong Shan Mountain
National Nature Reserve .] Beijing: Forestry Press. (In Chinese.)
Song Chaoshu and Qu Wenyuan.eds. (1996) [Scientific survey of
Dongzhai Bird Nature Reserve.] Beijing: Forestry Press. (In Chinese.)
Sun Quanhui, Zhang Zhengwang, Zheng Guangmei, Zhang Keyin,
Ruan Xiangfeng and Zhu Jiagui (2003) [Ranging behaviour of
territorial male Reeves’s Pheasants in the breeding season.] Acta
Zoologica Sinica 49: 318-324. (In Chinese.)
Wang Qishan (1983) [Birds of north slope of Dabie Shan, Anhui
Province.] Chinese Wildlife 4: 55-57. (In Chinese.)
Ye Yongzhong, Qu Wenyuan and Huang Yuanchao, eds. (2002)
[Scientific survey of Liankang Shan Nature Reserve.] Beijing: Science
Press. (In Chinese.)
Zhang Rongzu (1999) [Zoogeography of China.] Beijing: Science Press.
(In Chinese)
Zhang T aisong (1979) [Forest birds survey in Luoshan Forestry Farm.]
J. Henan Forestry Sci. Techn. 1: 87-88 (In Chinese.)
Zhang Taisong (1981) [A survey on insectivore bird in Luoshan Forestry
Farm.] Chinese J. Zool. 16:37-38. (In Chinese.)
Zhang Xiaofeng, Ba Mingting, Zhang Keyin and Li Xuede (2002)
[Investigation of the birds of winter in Dongzhai National Nature
Reserve.] J. Henan Agric. Univ. 36: 334-340. (In Chinese.)
Zhang Zhengwang, Ding Changqing, Ding Ping and Zheng Guangmai
(2003) [On the status and conservation strategies of Galliformes in
China.] Chinese Biodiv. 11: 414-421. (In Chinese.)
Zhou Jiaxing (1960) [Report of a preliminary survey of birds in
Shangcheng and Xinxian County.] United Journal of Xinxiang
Teachers’ College and College of Henan Chemical Engineering 1 : 69-
84. (In Chinese.)
Zheng Guangmei and Wang Qishan (1998) [China Red Data Book of
endangered animals: Aves.] Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese.)
Yang Liu, Zheng-wang Zhang, Jian-qiang Li, Yu Zhang and Shan Lu, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity
Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, 1 00875, Beijing, China; Email:
yangliubnu@gmail. com
Xiang-feng Ruan, Dongzhai Nature Reserve, Segang, Luoshan County, 464236, Henan, China.
APPENDIX
Forktail 24 (2008) A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China 87
88 YANG LIU et al. Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008) A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China 89
90
YANG LIU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008) A survey of the birds of the Dabie Shan range, central China 91
1 Seasonal status (assigned mainly based on Cheng 1987 and MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000, supplemented by our field observations):
R=Resident, P=Passage, S=Summer breeder, W=Winter visitor, V=Vagrant
2 International threat category and conservation status in China. IUCN Red List categories EN: Endangered, VU: Vulnerable, NT: Near
Threatened; and Classes I and II in the List of Wildlife under Chinese National Priority Protection.
3 Site codes are as in Fig 1 .
* Species new to the Dabie Shan range.
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 92-99
Nests, eggs, hatchlings and behaviour of the Masked
Finfoot Heliopais personatus from the Sundarbans
in Bangladesh, with first nesting observations
G. NEUMANN-DENZAU, E. FAHRNI MANSUR and R. MANSUR
During a week-long survey in August 2004, we found 19 nests of the Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus in a 60 km2 area of the
Bangladesh Sundarbans mangrove forest in the Ganges-Meghna-Brahmaputra delta. Three nests contained eggs (3-5 per clutch). The
preferred nesting tree was ‘sundri’ Heritiera forties (79% of nests). The nests were positioned in the first line of vegetation overhanging
riverbanks (mean stream width 23 m) with a mean height of the nest above high tide water level of 1 .8 m. The nesting behaviour, not
previously described, was studied at one nest. During the entire observation period (commencing three days before hatching), only
the female incubated the eggs; the male was not seen near the nest. While on the nest, the hatchlings were fed small fish and shrimp.
A presumed contact call of the female, heard before she returned to the chicks, was sound-recorded. The chicks had left the nest by the
morning after hatching. Future nesting surveys in the Sundarbans should cover at least the months of July and August to gather
information on nest densities, egg-laying and hatching dates, incubation periods, and the role of the sexes in nest construction and
incubation.
INTRODUCTION
According to the most comprehensive review of available
data on the Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus, its
geographic range covers Myanmar, Thailand, Laos,
Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia,
India and Bangladesh (BirdLife International 2001). In
Bangladesh this bird is only recorded from the
Sundarbans, the mangrove forest in the Ganges-Meghna-
Brahmaputra delta (Hussain and Acharya 1994, Khan
2003, 2005, Gani 2005) . There appear to be no confirmed
published sightings of the species from the Indian
Sundarbans, adjacent to the west. Breeding evidence
through the finding of nests and eggs is reported from
India, Myanmar and Malaysia, and through sightings of
juveniles from Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand (BirdLife
International 2001), Cambodia (Robson 2002) and
Bangladesh (Khan 2005).
Delany and Scott (2002) estimated the global
population at 2,500-10,000 with a T% threshold’ of 60
birds. The global status of Masked Finfoot in the IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species is ‘Vulnerable’ (VU
A2cd + 3cd; Cl) with declining trend (IUCN 2007).
According to the IUCN (2000) Red Book of Threatened
Birds of Bangladesh its national status is ‘Endangered’ (ie,
facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in
Bangladesh in the near future). The Masked Finfoot is
included in the Bangladesh Wildlife (Preservation)
(Amendment) Act 1974, in the 3rd Schedule: ‘protected
animals, i.e., animals which shall not be hunted, killed or
captured’ (Banik 1994).
Only a few authors, namely Baker (1919, 1935),
Hopwood (1921) and Cairns (1963), have dealt directly
with the nesting of the Masked Finfoot. Baker’s writings
must be treated with caution, as some of his nesting
information is known to be incorrect (Rasmussen and
Anderton 2005), so his findings require independent
corroboration. The first recorded Masked Finfoot nest
was discovered in Assam on 24 July 1 904 by M. Gregerson
and B. Nuttall and the one egg collected (Baker 1919) was
later found to be underdeveloped and addled. Hopwood
(1921) published the earliest details of the nidification,
gathered during 1 920 by the forest officers T. Marlow and
H. C. Smith from nesting sites in the flooded jungles ofthe
Irrawaddy river system, Myanmar. Cairns (1963)
examined 16 nests between 1941 and 1961 in Kedah State,
Malaysia.
Nests and eggs of Masked Finfoot have been collected
and described earlier, but this elusive bird has never been
studied or photographed on the nest. In this paper, we
describe nest observations of the Masked Finfoot in the
Bangladesh Sundarbans, and compare our results with
available historical data.
STUDY AREA AND METHODS
The entire Bangladesh Sundarbans (6,0 1 7 km2 mangrove
forest) is a Reserved Forest in south-west Bangladesh,
with its northern boundary c.35 km south of the city of
Khulna. It was designated a Wetland of International
Importance in 1 992. Three protected areas (Sundarbans-
East, -West and -South Sanctuaries) were established in
1 996 covering a total area of 1 ,397 km2, and were together
designated a World Heritage Site in 1997 (Wetlands
International 2008) . We have seen Masked Finfoot species
near Mirgamari (22°23'N 89°40'E), in Shapla Khal
(22°04'N 89°50'E), in Kotka Khal (2 1 °5 1 'N 89°48'E), in
Kachikhali Khal (22°52'N 89°50'E), at the eastern bank
of Sela Gang (21°55'N 89°41'E), east of Supati Khal
(21°57'N 89°49'E), and near Hiron Point (21°48'N
89°28,E).
During 16-22 August 2004, we surveyed 1 10 km of
waterways in the Sundarbans-East Sanctuary, covering
approximately 60 km2 or 1 % of the total area of the
Bangladesh Sundarbans. The survey was mainly conducted
from a man-powered wooden boat, occasionally from an
outboard engine boat, enabling passage through creeks with
a minimum width of 3 m. All accessible waterways in the
survey area were investigated for Masked Finfoot nests. At
first, we searched for any nest made of piled sticks. Later,
as we gained experience, we looked for nesting trees
standing near or in water, with nests approachable by the
bird on foot along a slanting trunk or branch, and nests
located directly above water. Track and nest locations
(Figure 1) were recorded with a Garmin GPS 12.
Forktail 24 (2008) Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus nesting observations in the Sundarbans
93
89°46'E: 89°47'E 89°48'E 89°49'E 89°50'E 89°51'E
D .
Figure 1 . Map of study area, in the south-eastern corner of Sundarbans
Reserve Forest, Bangladesh, with locations of active and old nests.
Track lines indicate the survey routes. Nest numbers correspond to
those in Table 1.
Trunk diameter at the high water mark, trunk diameter
at nest level, and nest size were measured with tape to the
nearest cm. For nest size, we measured diameter and
depth (distance from top of the rim to bottom of the
base). The height of the nest above high water mark was
visually estimated with an accuracy of c.10 cm at low
positions and c. 20-30 cm at high positions. The angle
between trunk or branch with nest and water surface was
visually estimated with an accuracy of c. 10-1 5°.
We estimated the stream width at nest locations using
the survey boat as a measuring reference. The condition
of the nests and materials used in their construction were
noted. Where eggs were present in an accessible nest
their maximum length and width were measured (to the
nearest 0. 5 mm) with a pair of callipers once the incubating
bird left the nest.
On the afternoon of 2 1 August 2004 we set up a hide on
the opposite bank of one of three active nests (#16, Table
1 ), ideal for direct observations. Observation sessions lasted
from dawn to dusk (c.06h30-18h00) on 22-26 August,
unless interrupted by constant rain, and ended on 26
August at 13h30 (total observation time: 47 hours, 20
minutes) . Summary statistics are presented as mean±SD.
RESULTS
Nests
In total, we found 19 Masked Finfoot nests, details of
which are presented in Table 1 . Linear distance between
Masked Finfoot nests was 220-2,200 m. We surveyed a
total of 1 1 0 km of waterways, so, on average, we found
one nest per 5.8 km. It was usually impossible to tell if an
empty nest was built in the present season or in an earlier
one, hence we cannot calculate a nest density. The
preferred nesting tree was ‘sundri’ Heritierafom.es (15 nests,
78.9%), followed by ‘dundul’ Xylocarpus granatum (3 nests,
15.8%) and ‘gewa’ Excoecaria agallocha (1 nest, 5.3%)
(Table 1).
All nest trees were leaning over water at all tide levels
(mean angle between water surface and trunk = 49.2°)
and positioned in the first row of vegetation along a creek
or in an isolated group of dead trees in the water near the
bank. No other local bird species (like crows Corvus spp.)
with comparable nest size would place these at heights as
low above the water (mean 1 .8 m), or as approachable by
climbing as the Masket Finfoot. The mean trunk diameter
at the high water level mark was 16.7 cm, while the mean
trunk diameter at nest level was 8.0 cm. We did not take
the water depths below the nests, but on all cases it was
deep enough, even at low tide, to ensure a fast escape for
the bird by jumping down or diving away. The mean
stream width recorded at the nesting sites was 23.3 m.
The tree canopy on both creek sides near the nest usually
did not meet overhead.
Masked Finfoot nests were built on a fork, naturally
formed by branches or the branching trunk. In two cases
(#16, 17) the nest was found embedded in nest fern
Asplenium sp. (Plate 1 ) . The nests consisted of dead twigs
loosely piled up, in two cases (#1, 2) interwoven with
slender leaves of ‘hental’ Phoenix paludosa or nest fern.
The basin was lined with dead leaves in three nests (#11,
16, 18). In three cases (#10, 12, 19), the nesting trees
were dead, in two of these the dead tree was covered with
the epiphytic twiner ‘pargacha’ Hoya parasitica.
Eggs
During the survey, three nests containing eggs were found
(#8, 11, 16). The clutch sizes were three, four and five.
The first nest was unapproachable, while the nine eggs
from the other two clutches had a mean size of 51.2 x
42.2 mm. All eggs were quite round, barely oval (mean
length to width 1:0.82; N=9). Some spots and blots in
lighter bluish grey and darker mouse-grey, medium brown
and dark violet were scattered on a light cream-coloured
ground.
Role of sexes
Both males and females were seen incubating on different
nests. At nest #8 a female was seen incubating on 1 7 and
1 9 August, at nest # 1 6 a female was sitting on the eggs on
21, 22, 23 and 24 August, feeding her hatchlings on 25
August, and at nest #1 1 an incubating male was present
on 18, 24 and 26 August.
94
G. NEUMANN-DENZAU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Hf: Heritiera fames', Xg : Xylocarpus granatum; Ea: Excoecaria agallocha
Incubation and nesting behaviour at nest #16
The female on the nest was never seen asleep; she was
wide awake and active with the exception of a few seconds
of dozing, when her grey-blue nictitating membrane
remained closed. She preened herself most of the time.
She also pecked at crawling insects in reach, caught flying
insects, and rearranged sticks in the nest structure.
Turning the eggs and changing her position increased in
frequency as the hatching time approached. No other
Masked Finfoot, male or female, was observed in the
proximity of the nest at any time.
Over 22-24 August, the mean incubation bout
observed was 1 56±97 minutes (N=7) and the mean inter¬
bout interval was 52±44 minutes (N=7). When leaving
the nest without being disturbed, the bird jumped from
a suitable branch while flapping its wings to ensure a soft
landing on the water surface. It quickly swam out of sight
and returned slowly searching for food along the water’s
edge. The female bird fed in close proximity to the nest
several times. She also left the nest exclusively for
bathing, involving diving, splashing and fluttering. After
this she tended to stand on a low overhanging branch at
Forktail 24 (2008) Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus nesting observations in the Sundarbans
95
a distance of about 30 m from the nest, tlap her wings,
and preen.
When returning to the nest (N=2 1), the female always
approached on foot, either by walking up the slanting
trunk of the nesting tree or by climbing up a higher
neighbouring tree and jumping down, landing just beside
the nest. There are no previous records of this behaviour.
While climbing up to the nest, she stopped frequently to
sort her feathers meticulously. The bird always returned
to the nest before rain started. It removed raindrops from
its feathers with a slight shaking of neck and body.
Hatching and hatchlings at nest #16
On 24 August 2004 at 1 0h43 the incubating female started
to poke at the eggs, and ate the smallest fragments of the
eggshells (six times during the following 7 hours 17
minutes of observation). By evening, the eggs showed
visible cracks and small holes. The female bird was
observed trying to open them, but none broke open
before nightfall. In the morning of 25 August three
chicks had hatched. The two remaining eggs, possibly
infertile, remained intact and were left unnoticed in
the nest.
Plate 1. Nest #16 with eggs of Masked Finfoot built in the centre of
an Asplenium fern, 21 August 2004. (G. and H. Denzau)
Plate 4. Female Masked Finfoot on the nest offering a fish (tail first)
to a chick, 25 August 2004. (E. and R. Fahmi Mansur)
Plate 2. Three freshly hatched Masked Finfoot chicks beside two
unfertile eggs, 25 August 2004. (E. and R. Fahmi Mansur)
Plate 5. Chicks (note bill marked with tiny white spot at the top)
besides adult female Masked Finfoot on the nest, 25 August 2004.
(G. and H. Denzau)
Plate 3. Female Masked Finfoot climbing the nesting tree with small
fish in bill for feeding the chicks, 25 August2004. (G. andFI. Denzau).
Plate 6. Female Masked Finfoot on the nest in gesture of defence
during approach of a Rhesus Macaque (on the left), 24 August 2004.
(E. and R. Fahrni Mansur)
96
G. NEUMANN-DENZAU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
The chicks were dark grey, much paler on the
underside, and paler also above and below a black eye-
stripe that joined with the black bill. The bill itself was
marked at the tip with a tiny white spot (Plate 2).
The food provided to the hatchlings by the female
bird consisted of whole small fish and shrimp. Holding
one fish or shrimp at a time laterally in her beak she
walked up to the nest (Plate 3) and fed the chicks (Plate
4) eleven times in 7 hours and 15 minutes, with mean
bouts on the nest of 26±28 minutes (N=10), and mean
intervals away of 12±7 minutes (N=10). After feeding,
the mother tucked the hatchlings under her body, but
one or the other managed occasionally to move around
within the nest (Plate 5).
The chicks were nidifugous, which was expected, but
had not been observed before. Heavy monsoon showers
poured down the first afternoon and night after hatching.
The female bird and all three chicks had left the nest by
the next morning (26 August) and were not seen again.
Depredation does not seem to have occurred, as no
indications were found.
Predators
Once a water monitor Varanus salvator swam below the
nesting tree on 23 August, but did not notice the bird on
the nest (#16). When people passed the same nesting site
by boat, the bird flattened its body into the nest depression
and relied on its effective camouflage. Disturbances at
nest # 1 6 were only caused by our own activities during
drop and pick up of an observer, not by other humans
passing by, as the creek ended blind. Other nests, like
#11 were located in connecting creeks with about 5-10
boats passing per day, but were not noticed by the local
people, as it was extremely well camouflaged. Once
detected a nest would be most likely plundered, as neither
the boundaries of the protected area nor the protected
status of the bird is well advertised among the public.
When a troop of rhesus macaques Macaca mulatta
passed by the nest (#16) on 24 August the incubating
female puffed up her feathers and stayed absolutely
motionless on the nest, relying completely on this defensive
gesture and her camouflage. One monkey spotted the
bird on the nest (Plate 6), but kept its distance and moved
on. On 26 August, after the mother and the hatchlings
had left the nest, a troop (presumably the same) of monkeys
passed by again. One approached the nest, grabbed one
of the two abandoned eggs and dropped it into the water.
When we discovered the first active nest (#8), the
adult bird jumped down and landed on the water surface
with abrupt and frantic movements, causing water to
splash up by flapping the wings. This looked like
distraction behaviour with the aim to lure predators from
nest and eggs. On another occasion the bird jumped from
the nest and disappeared out of sight immediately by
diving. The incubating female on nest # 1 6 soon got very
used to us and remained on the nest when we entered or
left the hide.
Vocalisations
The female Masked Finfoot uttered a low ga ga ga gackga
gack call once on 23 August while on the nest. After the
chicks had hatched (25 August) the female gave a
distinctive gun call while searching for food when close to
the nest, recorded seven times within c.90 seconds. A
sonogram of the recorded call was computed with the
audio spectrum analysis program Spectrogram (Fig. 2).
0.00 sec 0.20 sec 0 40 sec 0.60 sec
Figure 2. Waveform (amplitude vs time, A) and sonogram (frequency vs time, B) of the female Masked Finfoot’s call near the nest with newly
hatched chicks.
Forktail 24 (2008) Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus nesting observations in the Sundarbans
97
Each call lasted about 0 . 6 sec and consisted of eight notes
with durations of 0.03-0.05 sec (pitch 4 kHz, with gap at
2-3.5 kHz). This call is possibly a contact signal between
the adult and the chicks.
A loud and shrill alarm call kui-kui-kui. . . was observed
on another occasion (not near a nest), possibly comparable
to the harsh keek-keek-keek described by Khan (2003).
The characteristic ‘bubbling’ of the Masked Finfoot,
roughly comparable with the sound produced when
blowing through a straw into a glass of water, was also
heard on several occasions. This comparatively loud call
seems to be used for communicating over long distances,
because it was not heard in proximity of a nest.
Distribution
The Sundarbans in the Ganges-Meghna-Brahmaputra
delta contain the westernmost known population of
Masked Finfoot. Combining all available information,
this bird’s distribution appears to be confined to the eastern
half of the Bangladesh Sundarbans, encompassing the
freshwater and moderately saline zones in the Khulna,
Chandpai and Sarankhola ranges. Furthermore, it seems
that this shy bird gets accustomed to human presence
and it may therefore be more often seen in the eastern
areas with high frequencies of visitors, than in the western
areas. We noticed, that sightings and approachability of
Masked Finfoot rose with increasing tourism along certain
favourite boating routes, when silence prevailed (no engine
sound, no talking) and boats moved slowly.
We have observed this species in the Sundarbans of
Bangladesh all year round, with juveniles recorded
repeatedly in the months of September and October.
Masked Finfoot does not appear to be migratory in the
Sundarbans mangroves, although it has been suggested
to be so elsewhere. This generally shy bird hides in dense
undergrowth and prefers to search for food at low tide. Its
activities are partly nocturnal (Khan 2003) and its presence
not always easily detectable.
DISCUSSION
The breeding period of the Masked Finfoot in the
Bangladesh Sundarbans is during monsoon, from late
June to September, with hatching peaking sometime
between July and August. This finding is based on
following information. S. Boyati (verbally 2004)
discovered a nest in July 2004, with eggs hatching in
early August. Haider (2003) mentioned a nest plundered
in the end of July 2003, Khan (2003) in June/July
1999. In this survey (16-22 August 2004) we found one
clutch that hatched between 19 and 22 August (unless
depredated), one on 25 August, and one that had still not
hatched on 26 August. RM found a nest with three eggs
on 24 August 2003, with incubation ongoing on
14 September. This nest was found empty on
1 8 September. This observation means that the incubation
time for the Masked Finfoot probably exceeds three
weeks. Future nesting surveys in the Sundarbans should
cover at least the months July and August, and ideally
June to September, to add to our understanding of nest
densities, egg-laying and hatching dates, incubation
periods, and the role of the sexes in nest construction and
incubation.
Available dates of active nests (numbers in brackets)
found in other regions are: July (1 nest) from Assam,
India (Baker 1919); July (1), September (3), October
(12) from Malaysia (Cairns 1963); July (2), August (7)
from Myanmar (Hopwood 1 92 1 ); the latter partly overlap
with July (5), August (8) of clutches from Myanmar
preserved in the Natural History Museum (Tring, UK;
BMNH) labelled with dates between 20 July and 22
August. A comparison indicates a similar breeding season
for Myanmar, India and Bangladesh, but there are also
records from two months later from Malaysia.
Besides three different nesting tree species found in
this survey, S. Boyati (verbally 2004) found a Masked
Finfoot nest in a ‘passur’ Xylocarpus mekongensis tree in
the Bangladesh Sundarbans. The nesting sites described
earlier by Baker (1919, 1935) and Hopwood (1921) from
Myanmar, and by Cairns (1963) from Malaysia, differ
from those in the Sundarbans in occurring in non¬
mangrove habitat. By comparison with our data,
Hopwood (1921) mentioned a minimum distance
between two nests of 180 m from the nesting area in
Myanmar.
In our survey, in a tidal mangrove swamp, the mean
nest height above high water level was 1.8m, comparable
to the range of previous reports in a freshwater
environment: Hopwood (1921) found nests from a few
inches to nine feet (c.3 m) above water, and Cairns (1963)
considered 3-6 feet (c.1-2 m) being normal.
The water depth below all nests recorded was sufficient
for the nesting bird to make a diving escape, even during
low tide. Hopwood (1921) estimated the depth of water
below one nest as 5 feet (c. 1 .5 m), the water depth in the
swamp varying generally from 5 to 15 feet (c. 1 .5 to 4.5
m), or even more, according to the flood situation. Cairns
(1963) mentioned a depth of 6-9 inches (c. 15-23 cm).
Besides sticks and twigs as main construction material
the nests of the Masked Finfoot are sometimes interwoven
with a few long and slim leaves, like leaves of Phoenix
paludosa and Asplenium sp. in the Sundarbans. Similar
nest components are mentioned by Hopwood (1921):
‘lined with a few dead leaves’; Baker (1935): dined with
grass and reed-bits’; and Cairns (1963): ‘lined with dried
bamboo leaves’. These elastic materials presumably
improve stability and durability of the nest.
The nests we have found, with a mean depth of
16.3 cm, are considerably shallower than those described
in other reports. Hopwood (1921) and Cairns (1963)
stated nests from Myanmar and Malaysia to be one foot
(c.30 cm) deep.
In this survey, we found clutches of three, four and
five eggs. From the Bangladesh Sundarbans others have
reported one nest each with clutch sizes of eight (Khan
2003), five (Haider 2003), three (RM pers. obs. 2003)
and four (S. Boyati verbally 2004), resulting in a overall
mean of 4.611.7 eggs per nest (range 3-8, N=7),
presuming that all clutches were complete, as human egg
thieves would remove all eggs from a nest. However, this
is not a safe assumption for all non-human predators.
The mean clutch size recorded from Myanmar (Hopwood
1921) was 4.012.1 (range 2-7, N=8). The BMNH egg
collection from Myanmar (D. G. D. Russell in litt. 2006)
has 5.211.1 eggs per clutch (range 3-7, N= 1 5) , including
two clutches also described by Hopwood (1921). Five to
eight eggs per nest were found by Cairns (1963) in
Malaysia. If true, clutches with eight eggs are found rarely.
98
G. NEUMANN-DENZAU et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
reported only once from Sundarbans and an unknown
number of times from Malaysia.
The appearance of the eggs from Bangladesh fits
previous descriptions by Baker (19 19), Hopwood (1921),
and Cairns (1963), though these authors found in some
cases the ground colouration differing from creamy
(greenish, yellowish or greyish).
The eggs from Bangladesh with mean length of
51.2±2.4 mm and mean width of 42.2±1.0 mm (N=9)
(Table 1) do not differ significantly from the eggs from
Myanmar. The mean egg size from Myanmar as derived
from the measurements of Hopwood (1921) is 50.3±2.0
mm x 43.2±0.7 mm (N=27). Baker (1935) calculated an
average egg size of 52.0 mm x 43.7 mm (N=44) for eggs
from Myanmar without listing individual measurements.
According to D. G. D. Russell (in litt. 2006), Baker’s egg
setincluded 14eggs examined earlier by Hopwood. Caims
(1963) describes the mean dimensions of eggs from
Malaysia as c. 49 x 4 1 mm without giving further details.
This suggests that the eggs from Malaysia are the smallest.
The largest egg ever recorded (56.1 x 45.8 mm) came
from Myanmar (Baker 1935).
During our survey we found both male and female
birds incubating, with the exchange happening at irregular
intervals. There have been sightings of both on the same
nest at different times, based on direct observation (RM
pers. obs. 2003) and information from local people
(verbally 2003). Hopwood (1921) mentioned an
incubating female; Cairns (1963) said that both sexes
incubate. Overall the role of sexes related to nest building,
alternations in incubation and to rearing of the young
ones remains unclear.
The appearance of the chicks from the Bangladesh
Sundarbans match well with the detailed description of
Ticehurst (1929), who obtained six freshly hatched chicks
from Myanmar. He further noticed in the chicks a large
strong bill, a well-marked digital claw as in other rails, a
long soft downy tail (unlike in the Rallidae), and the
‘finned’ feet, but he did not mention a white tip to the bill.
The BMNH preserves six chicks, three as skins and three
in spirit (R. Prys-Jones in litt. 2005).
Several authors mention a breeding plumage, often
without describing how to distinguish breeding and non¬
breeding appearance. Others make it more clear, e.g.
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005): ‘breedingmalehas small
yellowish “horn” at base of bill’. Baker (1904) was the
first to notice the male bird’s tiny frontal shield and a
yellow horn, or frontal wattle, c. 8 mm long, brilliant chrome
yellow like the beak, after obtaining a male and a female
specimen from Assam (India) in June 1904. He presumed
this to be seasonal, but this appears to be incorrect: we
have never observed adult males without this peculiar bill-
knob in Bangladesh Sundarbans, in least 40-50 sightings
all year round during almost 20 years.
THREATS
Unfortunately, the Masked Finfoot is famous for its good
flavour. Hume and Davison (1878, p. 465) stated: ‘The
flesh is delicious, dark coloured but very juicy and highly
flavoured. If it could be tamed it would form an invaluable
addition to European poultry yards’. Masked Finfoot is
threatened by habitat destruction and hunting for human
consumption all over its range (BirdLife International
2001). The incubating bird often remains firmly seated
when predators approach. This behaviour makes it an
easy catch for passing humans on boats. The bird is simply
grabbed; no gun or trap is required, just the experience to
spot a nest. Therefore the Masked Finfoot is most threatened
during the nesting season. Only a few cases of poaching ever
become public. Khan (2003) reported that a man had
collected eight eggs from Bangladesh Sundarbans. Haider
(2003) was told that employees of a forest station in the
Bangladesh Sundarbans-East Sanctuary had discovered a
nest, caught and eaten the adult bird along with five eggs.
Conservation and awareness campaigns and
encouragement of law enforcement are required to reduce
poaching all over the range.
More research on the biology and ecology of these
attractive, but threatened birds is urgently needed. We
strongly recommend the Sundarbans in Bangladesh for
further studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank S. Boyati for showing us the first Masked Finfoot nest and
for sharing his knowledge. The crew of M. V. Chhuti of the Guide T ours
Ltd assisted us in the field with much enthusiasm. S. Hossain and M.
Schumacher helped produce Fig. 2 from the sound records of E. Fahrni
Mansur. The map was designed by T. Rahman and modified by A.
Schwarz.
REFERENCES
Baker, E. C. S. (1904) The occurrence of the Masked Fin-foot ( Heliopais
personata ) in Lakhimpur. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 16(1): 156.
Baker, E. C. S. (1919) in: Fourth Oological Dinner [1918]. Ibis: 1 54—
164.
Baker, E. C. S. (1935) The nidification of the birds of the Indian Empire.
Vol. 4. London: Taylor and Francis.
Banik, H. ( 1 994) Bangladesh Wildlife ( Preservation ) Order, 1 973. Comilla:
Shitutuni Book House.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Cairns, J. (1963) New breeding records of Malayan birds. J. Bombay
Nat. Hist. Soc. 60(1): 140-159.
Delany, S. and Scott, D. (2002) Waterbird population estimates. Third
edition. Wagemngen: Wetlands International.
Gani, M. O. (2005) Distribution of the Masked Finfoot Heliopais
personata in the Sundarbans Reserved Forest of Bangladesh. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 102(1): 112-114.
Haider, M. (2003) Bird crusaders of Babuganj, and other stories. New
Age, 30. Aug. 2003. Available from http://www.newagebd.com
Hopwood, C. ( 1 92 1 ) The nidification of the Masked Finfoot ( Heliopais
personata) . J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 27: 634-637.
Hume, A. O. and Davison, W. (1878) A revised list of the birds of
Tenasserim. Stray Feathers 6: 1-524.
Hussain, Z. and Acharya, G. (1994) Mangroves of Sundarbans. Vol. 2.
Bangladesh. Bangkok: IUCN.
IUCN (2000) Red book of threatened birds of Bangladesh. Dhaka: IUCN
Bangladesh.
IUCN (2007) Red list of threatened species. Available at http://
www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 11 March 2008.
Khan, M. M. H. (2003) Masked Finfoot Heliopais personata — the elusive
bird of the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 38:
43-45.
Forktail 24 (2008) Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus nesting observations in the Sundarbans
99
Khan, M. M. H. (2005) Species diversity, relative abundance and
habitat use of the birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary,
Bangladesh. Forktail 21: 79-86.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia. Vol.2.
Washington D.C and Barcelona: Smithsonian Institution and Lynx
Edicions.
Robson, C. (2002) From the field. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 36: 63.
Ticehurst, C. B. (1929) The downy young of Heliopais personata. Bull.
Brit. Om. Club 49: 65-66.
Wetlands International (2008) Sundarbans Reserved Forest
(Bangladesh 2BD001 , Ramsar Site No. 560). Available from http:/
/ramsar. wetlands.org. Accessed 17 June 2008.
Gertrud Neumann-Denzau, Im Brook 8, 24321 Panker, Germany. Email: denzau@t-online.de
Elisabeth Fahmi Mansur and Rubaiyat Mansur, c!o The Guide Tours Ltd, Darpan Complex, Plot-2, Gulshan Circle-2,
Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh. Email: mowgliz@gmail.com
FORKTAIL 24 (2008): 100-107
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls
Larus ichthyaetus from Qinghai Lake, China
SABIR BIN MUZAFFAR, JOHN Y. TAKEKAWA, DIANN J. PROSSER,
DAVID C. DOUGLAS, BAOPINGYAN, ZHI XING,YUANSHENG HOU, ERIC C. PALM
and SCOTT H. NEWMAN
We studied the seasonal movements and migration of ten Pallas’s Gulls Larus ichthyaetus from Qinghai Lake to assess migratory routes
and stopover areas. Each individual was captured and equipped with an 18 g solar-powered Platform Transmitter Terminal (PTT) to
track its movements from September 2007 to May 2008. Six individuals remained near Qinghai Lake until the PTTs stopped
transmitting. Three individuals flew 50-330 km from Qinghai Lake to nearby salt lakes. One individual departed on 8 December and
flew over 1,700 km south-west to arrive at coastal Bangladesh on 9 January 2008. Two individuals flew in October to the Brahmaputra
River in Assam, India, remaining in the area for at least one month until one stopped transmitting. The second individual travelled south¬
west to coastal Bangladesh. Of the two individuals overwintering in Bangladesh, one remained for 67 days before migrating north. The
second bird departed after 96 days, and it returned to Qinghai on 10 May 2008 after 48 days in migration. Both individuals that
overwintered in coastal Bangladesh arrived much later than the outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI H5N 1 ) in poultry
in 2007. This disparity in timing would tentatively suggest that this species was not involved in long-distance movements of the virus.
Instead, the converse may be true: previous work demonstrates the potential for virus spill-over from poultry into gulls and other wild
bird species upon arrival into locations with widespread HPAI H5N1 outbreaks and environmental contamination.
INTRODUCTION
In recent decades, the understanding of bird migration
has become of great importance to the conservation of
migratory bird species (Boere and Stroud 2006, Li and
Mundkur 2007). Declining wetland habitats, human
encroachment and emerging diseases seriously threaten
the existence of many waterbird species (Li and Mundkur
2007, Olsen et al. 2006). The cross-boundary nature of
long-distance migration requires that international
strategies be formulated to ensure protection of waterbird
species across their geographic ranges (Boere and Stroud
2006).
The lack of information on the timing of migration
and stopover areas used during transit by many migratory
waterbird species in Asia limits our ability to develop
conservation strategies through the annual cycle. Among
the waterbirds, gulls (Laridae) are somewhat neglected,
with little migration information available, particularly
from central and eastern Asia (Li and Mundkur 2007).
Asian Waterbird Censuses conducted over much of Asia
typically include gulls in their surveys, but since gulls can
be highly variable in their ecology and behaviour, they are
probably underestimated in these counts. Some gull
species are also often involved in or implicated in disease
transmission due to their close association with garbage
dumps (Muzaffar et al. 2006). An outbreak of Highly
Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI H5N1) in Qinghai
Lake, China in 2005 resulted in the deaths of over 6,000
waterbirds including over 1,500 gulls of two species
(Brown-headed Gull Larus brunnicephalus and Pallas’s
GullL. ichthyaetus) breeding in the area (Chen era/. 2005,
Liu et al. 2005, Chen et al. 2006).
Some information exists on the ecology of Pallas’s
Gulls, although their precise migratory routes and seasonal
movements are not well known (Ali and Ripley 1991, Li
and Mundkur 2007). Information on local movements,
and autumn and spring migration of this and other species
could also provide some insight into the possibility of
wild birds acting as vectors in the epidemiology of avian
influenza viruses in the region. Additionally, wild bird
movement studies provide information on stopover and
wintering areas for better management of threatened
species.
To this end, we evaluated the seasonal movements
of Pallas’s Gulls from Qinghai Lake, China. The
specific objectives of this study were to i) evaluate the
seasonal movements of the species at its breeding and
wintering areas, ii) delineate the migratory routes of
the species along the Central Asian Flyway and iii)
identify the stopover areas of the species along its migratory
routes.
STUDY AREA
This study was conducted at the Qinghai Lake National
Nature Reserve, Qinghai Province, China. Qinghai Lake
is located at the north-eastern end of the Qinghai-Tibet
Plateau and about 280 km west of the city of Xining in
Qinghai Province (Williams 1991, Liu et al. 2004). It is
situated at an elevation of 3,193 m above sea level and is
the largest saltwater lake in China, with an area of c.526
km2. Qinghai Lake is in an endorheic (closed) basin,
surrounded by mountains that are the source of its water.
Har Lake, a smaller salt lake, is located 200 km north¬
west of Qinghai Lake and the Qaidam Basin, with a span
of >300 km, lies west of Qinghai Lake. Six small islands
within Qinghai lake are important breeding areas for Bar¬
headed Goose Anser indicus. Brown-headed Gull Larus
brunnicephalus , Pallas’s Gull and Great Cormorant
Phalacrocorax carbo. The lake is frozen for much of the
year, opening up briefly during the summer and early
autumn (April-October), during which there is rapid
growth of vegetation, providing food and breeding habitat
for a large numbers of waterbirds. Human activities,
particularly the husbandry of yaks and other livestock in
the region has created extreme grazing pressure on the
surrounding grasslands causing severe degradation of
these habitats (Liu et al. 2004).
Forktail 24 (2008)
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls Larus ichthyaetus
101
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We compiled movement data from ten Pallas’s Gulls from
Qinghai Lake captured and marked at three sites: Da Lai
Quan (37° 1 1 '49"N 99°49'38"E), Ha Da Tan
(37°07'48"N 99°43'21"E) and shallow ponds near Niao
Dao (36°58'5 1 "N 99°52'27"E), all located along the
western and north-western edge of Qinghai Lake. We
examined local movements of gulls during the post¬
breeding period and followed their autumn migration
chronology and routes from Qinghai Lake to wintering
areas in South Asia. Gulls were captured on 14-18
September 2007 using noose-sets. Each noose set
consisted of 50-60 loops, and each loop was made of a
nylon monofilament attached to a 1 5 cm-long peg made
of bamboo (6 mm diameter). Individual nooses were
attached along a string separated by 30 cm. Pegs were
anchored 13 cm into the ground and sets of nooses were
arranged in a spiral radiating outwards from the center.
Fish bait was placed in the center of the spiral and gulls
attempting to reach the bait became entangled in the
nooses.
Each bird was weighed, measured and equipped with
an 1 8 g solar-powered portable transmitter terminal (PTT :
9 North Star Science and Technology, LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland U.S. A; and 1 Microwave Telemetry PTT- 100,
Columbia, Maryland U.S. A.). Each PTT measured
54x20x 17 mm (57x30x20 mm for PTT-100) and was
attached dors ally between the wings with a harness similar
to Dwyer (1972; see Miller 2005). The harness was made
of 5 mm wide T eflon 1 ribbon inside an 8 mm-wide tubular
Teflon® ribbon (Bally Ribbon Mills, Pennsylvania,
U.S. A.). The harness consisted of breast and body loops
around the keel with knots hardened with cyanoacrylate
glue. The PTT had a 200 mm long nylon-coated flexible-
stranded stainless-steel antenna protruding at a 45° angle
from the back. Birds were classified into adults or juveniles
based on plumage (Ali and Ripley 1991, Rasmussen and
Anderton 2005). The procedures for capture, handling,
and marking were approved by a U. S . Geological Survey
Animal Care and Use Committee.
Transmitter signals were received by the Argos data
system (CLS America Inc., Maryland, U.S. A.) and
transmitter locations were estimated on the basis of
Doppler shifts in transmitter frequencies. Location
accuracy classes were determined based on satellite-to-
PTT geometry, the number of transmissions received
from the PTT, and the stability of the PTT transmission
frequency during a satellite pass. For Location Classes
(LC) 3,2,1, and 0, CLS America rated accuracy as < 1 50,
<350, <1,000, and >1 ,000 m, respectively. Accuracy was
not estimated for LC A (3 messages received by satellite),
LC B (2 messages), and LC Z (latitude/longitude often
provided if > 1 message received) . Data from CLS America
were compiled and concatenated, and locations were
filtered with systematic plausibility tests of direction,
distance, and rate of movement between locations (Argos
Filtering Program, DCD), although LC 1-3 locations
were always retained.
We used ArcMap v.9.2 (Environmental Systems
Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, California, U.S. A.)
to plot and analyse the selected locations and delineate
local movements and migration routes. We divided the
seasonal movement cycle into four stages: 1) the post¬
breeding period, 15 September-21 October; 2) autumn
migration, 21 October-10 January; 3) wintering period,
24 December— 1 April; and 4) spring migration, 1 April-
3 1 May. We defined a stopover event as the use of a
migration area for more than two days after departure
from either the breeding area or the wintering area. We
defined wintering areas as areas where birds spent more
than 50 days between December and April.
RESULTS
We received 2,4 1 5 messages from the PTTs, providing a
total of 526 locations (Table 1). Only 18.3% of these
locations were ofLC 1-3 quality; the remaining were LC
0, A, B or Z. One of the PTTs continued providing
locations through the spring (until at least 3 1 May 2008) .
Two of the tracked individuals were adults (#73023 and
#73490) and the rest were juveniles. One of the adults
stopped transmitting 7 days after marking while the second
adult and two juveniles underwent long-distance
migration, making it difficult to compare movement
patterns between age classes. Adults and juveniles are
therefore lumped together in the summary presented here.
Post-breeding movements
Six birds remained within the vicinity of Qinghai Lake.
These birds stayed along the north-western and southern
shores, with occasional flights of up to 62 km from the
Qinghai Lake vicinity (Fig. 1). For instance one bird
Table 1. Summary of the performance of the Platform Transmitter Terminals that were deployed on ten Pallas’s Gulls from Qinghai Lake in
September 2007. Two PTTs were still active as of 31 May 2008.
Working Total Number of locations
102
SABIR BIN MUZAFFAR et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Figure 1. Local movements of
two Pallas’s Gulls (#73492 in
yellow and #73491 in blue)
around the immediate vicinity
of Qinghai Lake in 2007.
(#73491) remained within Qinghai Lake for the entire
time during which signals were received from the
transmitter (Fig. 1). All the birds that remained in the
Qinghai Lake vicinity stopped transmitting by 29
November 2007 . Birds were frequently located near small
waterbodies and river inlets, within 4 km of the lake shore.
One bird (#73492) remained near the north-eastern edge
of the lake, although on one occasion it moved c.45 km
east-south-east of the lake before returning shortly
afterwards (Fig. 1).
Two birds (#73486 and #73489) moved >190 km
north-west of Qinghai Lake soon after being marked,
reaching the site in about 5 days. Bird #73486 flew on 1 5
September 2007 to an area located 57 km south of Har
Lake and about 180 km north of the Qaidam Basin (Fig.
2). Its transmitter stopped on 3 October 2007, 130 km
north-west of the Da Lai Quan capture site. On 16
September 2007, #73489 moved 196 1cm to an area about
60 km south-west of Har Lake, arriving there by 21
September 2007 (Table 2, Fig. 2). It crossed between river
tributaries in valleys within an area with a 3 5 km radius over
aperiod of 20 days. It started movingback towards Qinghai
Lake on 10 October 2007 and arrived near the Niao Dao
capture site on 1 2 October 2007. It then flew south-west
on 1 3 October 2007 and arrived at the vicinity of the town
of Madoi, about 257 km south-west of the Niao Dao
capture site on 16 October 2007. This site was about 10
km east of Ngoring Lake, where it stayed until its signal
was lost on 4 December 2007 (Fig. 2).
Autumn migration and wintering
Three individuals (#73487, #73488 and #73490)
migrated from Qinghai Lake to north-eastern India and
coastal Bangladesh, where they overwintered (Fig. 3).
Bird #73488 flew south-west from Qinghai Lake on 31
October 2007 to arrive 1,006 km away in Arunachal
Pradesh, India, close to the border with the Tibetan
Autonomous Region, China, on 4 November 2007. This
individual then moved south for c.226 km to arrive in the
state of Assam in north-eastern India the following day.
It remained within Assam, moving along the Brahmaputra
River over a 1 50 km stretch, and traversing over Kaziranga
National Park (Fig. 4). It then started moving farther
south-south-west on 1 1 December 2007 to arrive on 24
Table 2. Migration, stopover locations and duration of stay for four Pallas’s Gulls from Qinghai Lake, China.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls Lams ichthyaetus
103
Figure 2. Short-distance
movements of two Pallas’s
Gulls (#74389 in pink and
#74386 in green) marked at
Qinghai Lake in 2007.
Maximum distance from
Qinghai Lake was between 110
and over 220 km.
Figure 3. Long-distance
migration routes of three
Pallas’s Gulls marked at
Qinghai Lake in autumn 2007-
winter 2008. Two birds
(#73488, shown in yellow and
#73490, in red) wintered in
coastal areas of Bangladesh,
while another (#73487, shown
in blue) wintered in north¬
eastern India.
December 2007 at southern Patenga region in Chittagong
on the south-eastern coast of Bangladesh, close to the
opening of Karnaphuli River into the Bay of Bengal. The
bird travelled from Qinghai Lake to Bangladesh in 52
days. It remained in the vicinity of coastal Chittagong for
the rest of the winter.
Individual #43490 flew south-south-west from
Qinghai Lake on 8 December 2007 arriving at south¬
eastern Qinghai province, 377 km away, on 25 December
2007. It then changed direction and flew west-south¬
west for about 48 km to arrive at the north-western tip of
Sichuan province, China. Subsequently, it proceeded to
104
SABIR BIN MUZAFFAR et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Burma
Bangladesh
Figure4. Stopover area of two
Pallas’s Gulls (#73488 in
yellow and #73487 in blue) in
Assam, India en-route to the
wintering area, where they
spent approximately one
month.
Burma
Bangladesh
Figure 5. Local movements
of two Pallas’s Gulls (#73490
in red and #73488 in yellow)
in wintering areas along the
coast of the Bay of Bengal in
Bangladesh.
south-eastern Tibet, close to the Tibet-India border on
31 December 2007. It then travelled 197 km south-south¬
west arriving at Arunachal Pradesh, India by 7 January
2008. It flew another 76 km south-west within Arunachal
Pradesh before proceeding 67 1 km south-west to the Bhola
region off coastal Bangladesh. This bird eventually arrived
in the central coastline of Bangladesh within the Barisal
Division on 10 January 2008 and remained within a 25
km radius of the region along the mouth of the Ganges
River for the rest of the winter. The total time taken by
this bird to travel from Qinghai Lake to Bangladesh was
32 days.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls Lams ichthyaetus
105
Individual #73487 flew south-south-west from
Qinghai Lake on 21 October 2007 and arrived in eastern
Tibet, 786 km away. It then moved south-west for 295
km, reaching Assam by 26 October 2007. It moved 150
km along the Brahmaputra River farther upstream from
#73488 although there was overlap between their
movements. Individual #73487 stopped transmitting on
2 December 2007, when it was in Assam. Two gulls
(#73488 and #73490) overwintering in coastal Bangladesh
used areas along the edges of major river outlets, mangrove
forest patches and paddy fields (Fig. 5).
Spring migration
Individual #73488 returned to Qinghai Lake after the
winter (Fig. 3) . It started moving north-west on 30 March
2008. The bird was detected again 148 km north-north¬
west of Ngoring Lake near Madoi on 9 May 2008. Bird
#73490 moved 142 km north-north-east on 27 February
2008 and stopped south of the confluence between the
Ganges and Meghna Rivers on 4 March 2008. It then
moved up to the Ganges-Meghna confluence the following
day, where it remained until last detected on 22 March
2008.
DISCUSSION
The movement of Pallas’s Gull documented in this study
conformed to the Central Asian Flyway reported for both
Anatidae and Charadriidae (Boere and Stroud 2006). All
three of the birds that migrated to north-eastern India and
Bangladesh followed a similar path along the eastern edge
of the Central Asian Flyway. This area overlaps broadly
with the East Asian Flyway of Anatidae (Miyabayashi and
Mundkur 1999) and the East Asian-Australasian Flyway
of shorebirds (Brown et al. 2001), although none of the
gulls moved south-east from Qinghai Lake, suggesting
that they were not following the East Asian Flyway.
Short-distance movements exhibited by some of the
marked birds illustrate the importance of salt lakes in the
region. The Qinghai Province includes a complex of salt
lakes, particularly in western and central Qinghai, along
the Qaidam Basin (Williams 1991). These salt lakes are
integral to the hydrology defining the landscape and
vegetation characteristics of the region. An earlier study
suggested that Pallas’s Gulls from Qinghai Lake may stay
in these areas for longer periods before moving south for
the winter (Zhang et al. 2006, NBBC 2006) . In that study
one of the two birds that migrated to Bangladesh made a
brief stop close to Shiqu in the extreme north-west of Sichuan
Province. King and Tai (1991) reported seeing Pallas’s
Gulls close to Shiqu and we suggest that they may use river
channels for brief stopovers en route to wintering areas.
Two of the three birds that underwent long-distance
migration towards Bangladesh stopped along the
Brahmaputra River in Assam. These two gulls traversed
along the river, remaining in the vicinity for about five
weeks. The Brahmaputra River stretch passing through
Assam is a significant area for many bird species, migratory
and resident alike (Barua and Sharma 1999, Islam and
Rahmani 2004). At least seven Important Bird Areas are
located immediately adjacent to this stretch of the
Brahmaputra (Islam and Rahmani 2004). These habitats
are part of the floodplain of the Brahmaputra and contain
linkages with surrounding wetland complexes, grasslands
and forests making them particularly attractive to
waterbirds (Islam and Rahmani 2004, Muzaffar 2004,
Muzaffar and Ahmed 2007).
Although one of the two birds spent time in the riparian
habitat adjacent to Kaziranga National Park, an
internationally significant park (Islam and Rahmani 2004),
the species was not reported by Barua and Sharma (1999)
in their survey of birds of Kaziranga. Additionally, the
Asian Waterbird Census had recorded the species from
T anguar Haor area (part of a freshwater wetland complex
in north-eastern Bangladesh) but not from the riparian
habitat of the Brahmaputra in Assam (Li and Mundkur
2007). This reflects the importance of telemetry studies
for identifying areas used by species at certain times of the
year that can potentially be missed by standard bird surveys.
The shoreline of the Brahmaputra River and
surrounding freshwater wetlands in Assam may serve as
important stopover areas for Pallas’s Gulls heading further
south towards the Bay of Bengal. Our study and an earlier
report (NBBC 2006) found similar movements of birds
that arrived in Bangladesh to overwinter. However, in the
earlier study, the stopover area for one of the marked birds
was at Zhaling Lake, adjacent to Ngoring Lake near Madoi,
where it stayed for slightly less than two months before
migrating south-west to Bangladesh (NBBC 2006). The
second bird in that study moved to Keuke Lake 118 km
south-west of Har Lake where it stayed for almost three
months before migrating south to Bangladesh. Stopover
areas of Pallas’s Gulls from the Qinghai Lake region,
therefore, are very widespread and presumably depend on
age of the birds, food abundance and weather patterns.
The six birds in our study that were tracked in the
vicinity of Qinghai may well have migrated south after we
lost their transmitter signals. The two gulls that
overwintered in the coastal areas of Bangladesh remained
in two distinct areas. One was located in the central
coastline of Bangladesh near Bhola and Barisal districts,
where replanted mangroves form the dominant vegetation
(NCSIP 1999), while the other spent most of its time in
the vicinity of the Patenga region of Chittagong, close to
a commercial sea port. Large numbers of Pallas’s Gulls
are reported regularly from both these areas, but especially
the central region (Lopez and Mundkur 1997, Khan 2005,
Rasmussen and Anderton 2005, Li and Mundkur 2007),
and it is likely that a high proportion of these birds are
from the Qinghai Lake region. The coastal mudflats and
mangrove patches are important wintering habitats for
Pallas’s Gulls. Large numbers of shorebirds, other gulls
and ducks are also recorded regularly from these areas
(Lopez and Mundkur 1997, Li and Mundkur 2007). One
of our gulls started its return trip to the north along the river
delta up to the Ganges-Meghna confluence rather than
over the land, as in the migration south from Assam to the
coast. Gulls may take advantage of food present along the
river shorelines during their return trip to Qinghai Lake.
Implications for avian influenza
Wild waterbirds act as reservoirs of many different avian
influenza viruses (categorised into subtypes) that usually
cause minor or no disease symptoms in wild waterbirds
or domestic poultry and are termed Low Pathogenicity
Avian Influenza (LPAI) viruses (Webster et al. 2006,
Swayne 2008). HPAI viruses have emerged historically
in different poultry from LPAI precursors (Webster et al.
2006, see Swayne 2008 for a review). Avian influenza
106
SABIR BIN MUZAFFAR et al.
Forktail 24 (2008)
virus of the subtype H5N1 first emerged as an HPAI in
poultry in 1997 in Hong Kong from LPAI H5N1 virus
precursors. This virus circulated and disseminated in
poultry initially in east and south-east Asia, subsequently
spreading to Europe and parts of Africa and resulting in
massive poultry culls to help contain its spread (Muzaffar
et al. 2006, Webster et al. 2006, Swayne 2008). The first
outbreak of HPAI H5N 1 in wild waterbirds in the absence
of poultry occurred in 2005 in Qinghai Lake, and
demonstrated the susceptibility of multiple wild migratory
bird species to the disease (Chen et al. 2005, 2006).
The first officially reported outbreak of HPAI H5N1
in Bangladesh was on 22 February 2007 (FAO 2008) but
it is likely that the virus was circulating prior to this date
as the first symptoms were noted on 5 February 2007
(OIE 2007, 2008, WHO 2008). In total, 221 confirmed
cases were reported in Bangladesh and the rapid spread of
the virus was most likely a result of little or no biosecurity
in the country’s poultry network (FAO 2008). During
initial outbreaks, feral crows tested positive for HPAI H5N 1
as a result of feeding on infected dead chickens left out in
the environment (FAO 2008). Environmental
contamination through improper disposal of carcasses,
eggs, or faecal material is thought to be a major route by
which the virus is exchanged among poultry and wild
birds (FAO 2007).
The first Pallas’s Gull in our study that overwintered
in Bangladesh arrived on 24 December 2007 while the
second arrived on 10 January 2008. By this time, HPAI
H5N1 was probably endemic and had infected
approximately one third of all districts in Bangladesh (FAO
2008, OIE 2007, 2008). We are unable to determine
whether migrating gulls, or other species could have
introduced HPAI H5N 1 into Bangladesh during southern
migration from the Qinghai Lake region into Bangladesh
in the autumn or winter of 2005 following the outbreak in
Qinghai Lake. Similarly, we do not know whether
migration could have introduced HPAI H5N1 virus in
2006, although significantly fewer wild bird cases were
reported for Qinghai Lake that year. It is important to
note that the movement of gulls or other migratory species
into a region experiencing widespread poultry outbreaks
demonstrates how the HPAI H5N 1 virus has the potential
to spill over from the poultry sector into wild bird species,
then enabling further spread or spatial movement of the
virus. This may also help explain persistence of the HPAI
H5N 1 virus in locations where poultry and wildlife species
are in regular close contact.
Further studies combining virological assessment of
wild birds with telemetry studies to determine timing and
duration of migration may help better explain the
epidemiology of HPAI H5N 1 . Additionally, surveillance
of wild birds and domestic poultry for both LPAI and
HPAI viruses combined with telemetry studies to
determine extent and duration of overlap in the ecology of
wild and domestic birds are necessary to help determine
the risk of infecting wild birds with viruses from poultry
and vice versa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Steve Schwarzbach (Western Ecological Research Center,
WERC) and Judd Howell (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center), United
States Geological Survey (USGS) for supporting this project. Funding
was provided by the Government of Sweden, USGS and the United
Nations Food and Agriculture Organization — EMPRES Wildlife
Programme in the Animal Health Service. We extend our gratitude to
the staff of Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve and the Chinese
Academy of Sciences for field and logistical support. We thank Delong
Zhao for translation and Bill Perry (USGS WERC) for maintaining the
telemetry website. We thank Javier Sanz Alvarez (FAO) for confirming
outbreak information from the EMPRES-I database, and Sampath
Seneviratne (Memorial University, Canada), Jennifer Lavers, (CSIRO
Marine Research, Tasmania), Taej Mundkur (FAO) and two
anonymous reviewers for providing critical comments on an earlier
version of the manuscript. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in
this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply
endorsement by the U.S. government.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1991) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan: together with those of Bangladesh , Nepal, Bhutan and Sri
Lanka. Vols. 1-12. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Barua, M. and Sharma, P. (1999) Birds of Kaziranga National Park,
India. Forktail 15: 47-60.
Boere, G. C. and Stroud, D. A. (2006) The flyway concept: what it is
and what it isn’t. Pp. 40-47 in G. C. Boere, C. A. Galbraith and
D. A. Stroud, eds. Waterbirds around the world. Edinburgh: The
Stationery Office.
Brown, S., Hickey, C., Harrington, B. and Gill, R., eds. (2001) United
States shorebird conservation plan. Second Edition. Massachusetts:
Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences.
Chen, H., Smith, G. J. D., Zhang, S. Y., Qin, K., Wang, J., Li, K. S.,
Webster, R. G., Peiris, J. S. M. and Guan, Y. (2005) H5N1 virus
outbreak in migratory waterfowl. Nature 436: 191-192.
Chen, H., Li, Y., Li, Z., Shi, J., Shinya, K., Deng, G., Qi, Q., Tian, G.,
Fan, S., Zhao, H., Sun, H. and Kawaoka, Y. (2006) Properties and
dissemination of H5N 1 viruses isolated during an influenza outbreak
in migratory waterfowl in Western China. J. Virol. 80:5976-5983.
Dwyer, T. J. (1972) An adjustable radio package for ducks. Bird Band.
43: 282-284.
FAO (2007) Wild Bird and Avian Influenza: an Introduction to Applied
Field Research and Disease Sampling Techniques. Edited by
Whitworth, D., Newman, S.H., Mundkur, T. and Harris, P. FAO
Animal Production and Health Manual No. 5. Rome, Italy: Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at
http://www.fao.org/avianflu/en/wildlife/info_res.htm
FAO (2008) FAO EMPRES-I database. Emergency Centre for
Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Animal Health
Service. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations.
Islam, M. Z. and Rahmani, A. R. (2004) Important Bird Areas in India:
priority sites for conservation. Mumbai, India: Bombay Natural
History Society and BirdLife International.
Khan, M. H. (2005) Species diversity, relative abundance and habitat
use of the birds in the Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary,
Bangladesh. Forktail 21: 79-86.
King, B. and Tai, P. J. ( 1 99 1 ) Some bird observations in Ganzi prefecture
of extreme northwest Sichuan Province, China. Forktail 6: 1 5-23.
Li, Z. W. D. and Mundkur, T. (2007) Numbers and distribution of
waterbirds and wetlands in the Asia-Pacific region: results of the Asian
Waterbird Census 2002-2004. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Wetlands
International.
Liu, J., Xiao, H., Lei, F., Zhu, Q., Qin, K., Zhang, X.-W.,
Zhang, X.-L., Zhao, D., Wang, G., Feng, Y., Ma, J., Liu, W.,
Wang, J. and Gao, G. F. (2005) Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza
virus infection in migratory birds. Science 309: 1206.
Forktail 24 (2008)
Seasonal movements and migration of Pallas’s Gulls Larus ichthyaetus
107
Liu, Y., Zha, Y., Gao, J. and Ni, S. (2004) Assessment of grassland
degradation near Lake Qinghai, West China, using Landsat TM
and in situ reflectance spectra data. Inti. J. Remot. Sens. 25: 4177-
4189.
Lopez, A. and Mundkur, T. (1997) The Asian Waterfowl Census, 1994-
1 996. Results of the coordinated waterbird census and an overview of the
status of wetlands in Asia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Wetlands
International.
Miller, M. R.,Takekawa, J. Y.,Fleskes, J. P., Orthmeyer, D. L., Casazza,
M. L. and Perry, W. M. (2005) Spring migration of Northern
Pintails from California’s Central Valley wintering area tracked
with satellite telemetry: routes, timing, and destinations. Can. J.
Zool. 83: 1314-1332.
Miyabayashi, Y. and Mundkur, T. ( 1 999) Atlas of key sites for Anatidae
in the East Asian Flyway. Tokyo: Japan, and Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia: Wetlands International — Asia Pacific. Available at http:/
/www. jawgp.org/anet/aaal999/aaaendx.htm. Accessed 11 March
2008.
Muzaffar, S. B. (2004) Diurnal time-activity budgets in wintering
Ferruginous PochardHyr/rya nyroca inTanguar Haor, Bangladesh.
Forktail 20: 17-19.
Muzaffar, S. B. and Ahmed, F. A. (2007) The effects of the flood cycle
on the diversity and composition of the phytoplankton community
of a seasonally flooded Ramsar wetland in Bangladesh. Wetl. Ecol.
Manag. 15: 81-93.
Muzaffar, S. B., Ydenberg, R. C. and Jones, I. L. (2006) Avian influenza:
an ecological and evolutionary perspective for waterbird scientists.
Waterbirds 29: 243-257.
NBBC (2006) The migration dynamic of important breeding waterbirds
and the precaution of avian influenza at Qinghai Lake, China.
Unpublished report. Beijing: National Bird Banding Center of
China.
NCSIP-1 (1999) Reports on crops, forestry, livestock sub-sectors for
integration of National Conservation Strategy recommendations into
national economy planning. National Conservation Strategy
Implementation Project-1. Dhaka: Ministry of Environment and
Forest, and Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
OIE (2007) Immediate Notification Report. Country: Bangladesh,
Report #5154, World Organization for Animal Health (Office
International des Epizooties) . Available at http://www.oie.int/wahid-
prod/reports/en_imm_00000051 54_20070330_184220.pdf
OIE (2008) Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Report. Country:
Bangladesh. Report #7107, World Organization for Animal
Health (Office International des Epizooties). Available at
http://www.oie.int/wahid-prod/reports/
en_fup_0000007107_2008061 l_121734.pdf
Olsen, B., Munster, V. J., Wallensten, A., Waldenstrom, J., Osterhaus,
A. D. M. E. and Fouchier, R. A. M. (2006) Global patterns of
influenza A virus in wild birds. Science 312: 385-388.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Vol. 2. Attributes and Status. Washington, D.C.and
Barcelona: Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Swayne, D. E. (2008) Avian influenza. Ames: Iowa: Blackwell Publishing.
WHO (2008 ) Avian influenza: situation in Bangladesh. The World Health
Organization Avian Influenza update. Available at http://
www.searo.who.int/EN/Sectionl0/Sectionl027/Section2095/
Section2366_13672.htm
Webster, R. G., Peiris, M., Chen H. and Guan, Y. (2006) H5N1
outbreaks and enzootic influenza. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12: 3-8.
Williams, W. D. (1991) Chinese and Mongolian saline lakes: a
limnological overview. Hydrobiologia 210: 39-66.
Zhang, G., Liu, D, Jiang, H., Hou, Y., Dai, M., Chu, G. and Xing, Z.
(2008) [Movement of four breeding waterbirds at Qinghai Lake,
China.] Biodiv. Sci. 16: 279-287 (In Chinese.)
Sabir Bin Muzaffar, U. S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station,
505 Azuar Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, U. S. A., and University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA
95616, U. S. A. Email: smuzaffar@usgs.gov
John Y. Takekawa and Eric C. Palm, U. S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Francisco Bay
Estuary Field Station, 505 Azuar Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, U. S. A.
DiannJ. Prosser, U. S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Beltsville Lab, Building 308, 10300 Baltimore
Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705 U. S. A.
David C. Douglas, U. S. Geological Survey, 3100 National Park Road, Juneau, AK 99801, U. S. A.
Baoping Yan, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4 South 4th Street, Beijing 100080,
China.
Zhi Xing and Yuansheng Hou, Bureau of Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve, 25 Xichuannan Road, Xining, Qinghai
810003, China.
Scott H. Newman, Animal Health Service, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di
Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy.
108
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
The first documented nest of Rufous-breasted
Bush Robin Tarsiger hyperythrus , from east Nepal
JACK H. COX and DIRGA S. RAI
On 3 June 2002 at about 06h20, DSR observed a male
and a female Rufous-breasted Bush Robin Tarsiger
hyperythrus repeatedly carrying food to a gap in stony soil,
and soon thereafter located a nest in a small glade on
Bukur Danda (= Bukur Ridge) in the Sankhuwa Khola
watershed, east Nepal at c.3,710 m (27°30.78TN
86°56.657'E) (Plate la).
The nest site glade, located slightly above the treeline,
featured barberry Berberis sp., Rhododendron sp. and other
bushes. The site is at the ecotone of alpine shrubberies
and a nearly pristine, densely forested section of the
Makalu-Barun Buffer Zone that adjoins Makalu-Barun
National Park to the north. Birch, with an understorey of
dwarf rhododendron, was the primary forest type in the
immediate vicinity, which is consistent with the summer
habitat type reported for Rufous-breasted Bush Robin
(Grimmett et al. 1998). Scattered Himalayan silver fir
Abies spectabilis formed the treeline at c.3,675 m.
DR was joined by JC for further observations from
06h45 to 07h30. Closer inspection revealed that the nest,
concealed by a thin cascade of dried herb stalks and
wildflower sprigs, held three nestlings, each naked except
for tufts of down around the head, and eyes yet unopened .
The nest was situated under a mossy stone, recessed
4.5 cm from the outer edge of the gap (Plate lb).
Live moss formed an enlarged base to the buttressed
nest cup. The nest sides were loosely stitched with dried
strands of thin grass 4-6 cm in length, bits of brown
leaves, fern pinnae and black rhizomes (Plates lb
and lc). The rim of the cup was oval and measured
c.9x 1 1 cm. Rim diameter was smaller at the rear (2 cm)
than the front (c.4 cm). Nestling presence obstructed
direct measurement of cup depth, which was estimated
as 5 cm. The cup was lined with soft whitish filaments
(Plate lc) which have been identified as hair of a wild
ungulate, probably musk deer Moschus moschiferous
(H. S. Nepali, personal communication).
Birds on the ground usually carried food and kept
15-25 m from the nest. The male ventured occasionally
to within 10 m, where at one point he stood motionless
and reflected magnificently in the early morning sun and
dew. While nest measurements and photographs were
taken during a 4 min inspection near the end of
observations, the male waited at the edge of the glade
and gave a monotonous plip...plip...plip alarm. He
immediately returned to the nest carrying winged
insects upon retreat of the authors. No other vocalisations
were heard. We sought to minimise disturbance by
obtaining nest measurements and photographs as
quickly as possible, and withdrew to a crouched position
Plate 1 . Nest of Rufous-breasted Bush Robin: (A) Nesting hole and surrounding vegetation; (B) View of nest and chicks after parting the cascade
of dried vegetation; (C) Hair-lined nest cup and nestlings.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
109
c.20 m away at the glade periphery to wait for the male’s
return.
Rufous-breasted Bush Robin occurs locally frequent
in Nepal as far west as the Annapurna Himal (Inskipp and
Inskipp 1991), and as our observations in the Sankhuwa
and elsewhere in Nepal in summer attest, is not shy
(Grimmett et al. 2000). Prior to the observation detailed
here, nesting of the species was undocumented (Rasmussen
and Anderton 2005; personal search of literature).
Several breeding records are known, all of these from
the Helambu region of central Nepal. A pair was observed
feeding young on 24 and 25 May 1 979 at c.3500 m on the
west side of the Gandak-Kosi watershed. The nest was not
located but was on or near the ground at the edge of a shady,
wooded ravine (Redman et al. 1984). Most other records
are from the Gapte Cave area. A pair was observed on 13
May 1980 alarm-calling and flying into a hole on a grassy
slope. The hole was not checked for fear of causing the birds
to abandon a presumed nest with eggs (Inskipp and Inskipp
1 980) . On 1 4 May 1980 a different pair was recorded, with
the male seen carrying food to a nest hole in a shady and
watered but inaccessible ravine (Inskipp and Inskipp 1 980) .
In May 1982 a pair was observed feeding young (Fairbanks
1 982) . The only other breeding record is of young just able
to fly on 3 June at c.3,200 m in Helambu (Fleming 1984).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Carol Inskipp kindly provided all known published and unpublished
breeding records of Rufous-breasted Bush Robin in Nepal. Rajan Rai,
Niraj Rai, Jitan Pancha Rai and Indra Bahadur Tamang contributed
crucial logistical assistance to access the remote nesting area. James
Dean, Courtney Shaw and Helen James of the National Museum of
Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, facilitated visits to the Bird
Division for a search of relevant literature. Tirtha Bahadur Shrestha
and H. S. ‘Kazi’ Nepali helped identify nest material. Ishu Shrestha
and Arun Manandhar assisted production of the plates. Robert L.
Fleming, Jr. and Carol Inskipp reviewed a draft of this note and provided
valuable and appreciated input.
REFERENCES
Fairbank, R. F. (1982) Notes on birds recorded in Nepal, 1982.
Unpublished.
Fleming, R. L. Sr., Fleming, R. L. Jr. and Bangdel, L. S. (1984) Birds of
Nepal. Third edition. Kathmandu: Avalok.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian
Subcontinent. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2000) Birds of Nepal. New
Delhi: Prakash Books.
Inskipp, T. P. and Inskipp, C. (1980) Notes on birds recorded in Nepal,
April-May 1980. Unpublished manuscript.
Inskipp, T. P. and Inskipp, C. (1991) A guide to the birds of Nepal, second
edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderson, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide, Vols. 1 and 2. Washington, D. C. and Barcelona:
Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Redman, N. J., Lambert, F. and Grimmett, R. F. (1984) Some
observations of scarce birds in Nepal. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
81:49-53.
Jack H. Cox, 2919 Colony Road, Charlotte, NC, USA 28211; Email: jackcoxjr@yahoo.com
Dirga S. Rai, Ward No. 5, Kardo village, VDC Chheskam, Solukhumbu District, Sagarmatha Zone, Nepal.
Black Baza Aviceda leuphotes : first confirmed
record for Bhutan
ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
The Black Baza Aviceda leuphotes is distributed from north¬
eastern India to South-East Asia, with disjunct populations
in south India and Sri Lanka (Ali and Ripley 1987, Grewal
et al. 2002). In north-eastern India, it is largely an
uncommon resident although in some pockets of Assam
it is fairly common (Choudhury 2000, 2006a) . In Assam,
the bird has been recorded from areas close to the India-
Bhutan border, especially in Manas National Park
(Choudhury 2006b) . The Black Baza was listed for Bhutan
by Inskipp et al. (1999) but subsequently deleted as the
observers withdrew their records (Inskipp et al. 2004).
Ali et al. (1996), Choudhury (2006c) and Spierenburg
(2005) also did not record it from Bhutan.
I here report a confirmation that this species occurs in
Bhutan. At about 1 5h 1 5 on 5 June 2007, while driving
from Panbari to Gabhorukunda in the Manas National
Park, Assam, I observed a Black Baza perched in a tree
c.50 m south of Boundary Pillar number 194/3 on the
India-Bhutan border. The site (26°47TSI 90°50'E) was not
far from the Gabhorukunda River, a tributary of the Manas
River. The terrain was almost flat with low undulations,
with an altitude of about 250 m. When we drove closer,
the bird took off and flew in a northerly direction into
Bhutan. It was visible for c. 15-20 m into Bhutan before
I lost sight of it. The Bhutanese side of the border lies in
the Royal Manas National Park in Sarpang district.
When first observed, the Black Baza was perched
c.5-6 m high in a Dillenia pentagyna tree in open mixed
woodland containing other tree species such as
Lagerstroemia parviflora and Bombax ceiba, and some tall
grass on the ground. At first sight the bird looked like a
medium-sized raptor. When observed with a 14x
monocular, it was easily identifiable by its black upperparts
and crested head, and chestnut and buff barrings on the
underparts. On the perched bird, the white upper-breast
band followed by black and then chestnut bands could
clearly be seen. The barring on the underparts was more
conspicuous when the bird took flight. The wings were
110
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
broad and moderately rounded. Its upright crest, however,
was initially overlooked owing to the light conditions. Bird
surveys in southern Bhutan have not been exhaustive and
one might expect that other species typical of the plains and
lower foothills will eventually be added to the Bhutan list.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following for their help during my visit: P.K.
Brahma (Ranger of Panbari), Lachit Nath, Orkhiram Boro and other
Forest staff; Hakim and Gandhi Boro (both drivers); M. Saikia and
other members of Assam police; and members of the Panbari Ecotourism
Society.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India
and Pakistan , 2nd edition. Bombay, India: Oxford University Press.
Ali, S., Biswas, B. and Ripley, S. D. (1996) The birds of Bhutan. Rec.
Zool. Survey India, Occ. Pap. 136. Calcutta, India : Zoological
Survey of India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2000) The birds of Assam. Guwahati, India: Gibbon
Books and WWF-India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2006a) A pocket guide to the birds of Arunachal Pradesh.
Guwahati: Gibbon Books and The Rhino Foundation for Nature
in NE India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2006b) Birds of Manas National Park. Guwahati:
Gibbon Books and The Rhino Foundation for Nature in NE India.
Choudhury, A. U. (2006c) Some new and interesting birds records
from Bhutan. Indian Birds 3(2): 51-53.
Grewal, B., Harvey, B. and Pfister, O. (2002) A photographic guide to
the birds of India. Hong Kong: Periplus Editions.
Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T. and Grimmett, R. (1999) Birds of Bhutan.
London: Christopher Helm.
Inskipp, C. , Inskipp, T. and Grimmett, R. (2004) Birds of Bhutan. New
Delhi: Timeless Books.
Spierenburg, P. (2005) Birds in Bhutan: status and distribution. Bedford,
U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
Anwaruddin Choudhury, The Rhino Foundation for nature in North-east India, c/o Assam Co. Ltd, Bamunimaidam,
Guwahati 781 021, Assam, India. Email: badrul@sify.com
An appraisal of recent taxonomic reappraisals based
on character scoring systems
A.T. PETERSON and R. G. MOYLE
Three recent papers (Collar 2006a, b, 2007b) present
taxonomic reappraisals of a significant swath of Asian
bird diversity, recommending elevation of numerous
populations and subspecies to species rank (Collar and
Pilgrim 2007). Certainly, attention to patterns ofvariation
and differentiation and their implications for species limits
in Asian birds is both welcome and badly needed, but
several concerns arise from the methodology employed.
This note aims to clarify the nature of this system in the
context of modern species concepts, and to examine what
actually it achieves and what it leaves unassessed . Although
the methodology has yet to be formally described (listed
as in preparation in 2006), the large number of taxonomic
changes recommended (Collar 2006a, b, 2007b) and now
codified in a standard ornithological reference (del Hoyo
et al. 2007) begs careful discussion by the ornithological
community, as wrong decisions can make for bad
taxonomy and bad conservation action.
The scoring system (Collar 2006a) involves tallying
differences between populations as major (3 points),
medium (2 points), or minor (1 point), summing these
scores, and using 7 as a criterion for species status. One
publication (Collar 2006a) carries the caveat that species
status cannot be achieved based solely on minor or
mensural characters, and that ‘all mensural characters,
no matter how highly statistically significant, are scored
as minor characters. ’ However, a more recent publication
states ‘In Collar (2006a) I only allowed morphometric
differences to count as minor characters, for reasons of
complexity of material and inadequately developed
criteria, but here I regard this restraint as unnecessary’
(Collar 2007b). Curiously, in this more recent paper,
which treats Loriculus hanging parrots in the Moluccas
and Sulawesi, the split that is recommended depends on
the size difference between L. sclateri and L. amabilis
counting as a major difference (3 points) — were Collar to
have followed his previous caveats, this pair of forms would
differ only by 7-8 points, and would be more ambiguous
as to whether it merits splitting.
GEOGRAPHY
A first question is the species concept on which this method
is founded, as species concepts are the critical basis for
these decisions (Zink and McKitrick 1 995, Remsen 2005,
Peterson and Navarro-Siguenza 2006). Collar has on
numerous occasions (Collar 1996, Collar and
Spottiswoode 2005, Collar 2007a) expressed his dislike
for the Phylogenetic Species Concept (PSC, which defines
species based on diagnosability and monophyly).
Although he has not (to our knowledge) referred explicitly
to the Biological Species Concept (BSC) as the basis for
the scoring system, it appears that the BSC forms the
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
111
basis ofhis taxonomic opinion. Mayr (1963) offered this
BSC definition: ‘species are groups of [actually or
potentially] interbreeding natural populations that are
reproductively isolated from other such groups.’
Importantly, though, for consideration of Collar’s work,
Mayr commented on the same page, ‘The more distant
two populations are in space and time, the more difficult
it becomes to test their species status in relation to each
other ....’As such, careful consideration of the geographic
relationships among forms under consideration becomes
central to BSC decisions regarding species limits.
Nonetheless, at least in print, Collar apparently pays
only occasional attention to the geography of the forms
that he considers, and spatial position certainly does not
enter into the quantitative scoring system. It is stated in
the abstract (but only very indirectly in the text) of the
most detailed explanation of the method (Collar 2006a)
that the method is designed for application to allopatric
taxa. Although some species accounts in the three papers
mention allopatry, sympatry, or spatial arrangement, most
focus solely on the history of taxonomic opinion and the
character scores achieved. Most of the taxa treated, we
concede, are insular or genuinely disjunct and allopatric,
but several of the forms under consideration approach
one another closely in range and could be considered
parapatric (e.g., Garrulax merulinus group, Spelaeomis
chocolatinus group, Napothera rabori), yet spatial trends
are not discussed. Collar’s clearest reference to geographic
situation of the forms under consideration is in the
discussion of Yuhina castaniceps , in which he states ‘where
the morphologically closest subspecies is separated
geographically by one or more other taxa in the subspecies,
there is a case for adding a point, which would be
conveniently reassuring in this case’ (Collar 2006a) , which
seems nothing short of an ad hoc manipulation. Without
this extra point, the form everetti remains on the cusp of
species-level distinction, and Collar admits that ‘the
differences, other than the crown, are very minor and
debatable.’
Collar (2006a) dismissed the British Ornithologists’
Union guidelines for assigning species rank (Helbig et al.
2002) as setting the bar too low, in essence allowing too
many species to be recognised, but seems to have missed
the useful, clear, and operational ideas set out in that
publication. Helbig et al. (2002) not only reviewed
conceptual ideas, but also laid out a necessarily complex,
but clear and reasoned, operational plan for decisions
regarding species limits. They correctly pointed out that
decisions based on the same degree of phenotypic
difference will often differ given distinct geographic
relationships between the forms in question — Collar
nonetheless relies in his discussions chiefly or exclusively
on his scorings.
SUBJECTIVITY
A second major concern is the subjectivity involved in the
scoring system (Collar 2006a, b, 2007b). To give a few
examples, in the description of the method (Collar 2006a),
he uses the phrase ‘what I judge to be a major character’
and in the species accounts we see wording such as ‘it is
a leap of faith’ (p. 93), ‘is probably variable’ (p. 91), and
‘should, for the moment, allow it species status’ (p. 96),
among other examples. Collar’s scoring system is indeed
subjective — does a red crown versus a green crown merit
the same score in a barbet as in a Phylloscopus warbler?
The variable treatment of mensural characters described
above is an additional concrete example. These decisions
will inevitably end up being a simple matter of opinion
and a priori biases — assigning a number to a subjective
decision does not impart objectivity to the process. Thus,
the scoring system, as currently described and
implemented, adds a veneer of objectivity, yet remains
almost entirely subjective, and this is not even mentioning
the difficulties of deciding which differences in
vocalisations are major or minor. Surely, this sort of
opinion-driven taxonomy is not repeatable, and research
generally is required to be repeatable for it to be considered
science.
The operational characteristics of this quantitative
character scoring method distill to the following: ( 1 ) focus
is on establishment of multiple-character phenotypic
difference; (2) geographic situation and potential for
interchange of genes is not emphasised heavily; and (3)
characters are not weighed based on their likely
involvement in establishment of reproductive isolation.
This system, then, is not particularly allied to recent BSC
methodologies and does not address key issues necessary
for BSC-based decisions. Rather, in spite of Collar’s oft-
expressed dislike for the PSC (Collar 1996, Collar and
Spottiswoode 2005, Collar 2007a), his scoring system
distills down to a simple PSC criterion — diagnosability.
The method’s strengths are in dealing with allopatric
taxa, as this quandary has long complicated BSC
applications for lack of a test of sympatry, so the multiple-
character basis of achieving the ‘critical’ score of 7 avoids
micro-division based on trivial characters that concerns
him regarding the PSC (>3 characters would be necessary)
(Collar 2007a). The method has so far been used to
evaluate certain groups of barbets and babblers, groups
that generally display fairly apparent differences between
species and many allopatric populations. We envision
that the same criteria will be difficult to apply to groups
with more subtle differences like swiftlets, Phylloscopus
and Seicercus warblers, cuckoo-shrikes, and many bulbuls.
However, even in this best-case situation, the method is
seriously vulnerable to subjective opinion entering into
decisions, as illustrated above.
In sum, the scoring system is based chiefly on
diagnosability as in the PSC, yet does not take into account
the lineage concepts inherent in the PSC (De Queiroz
and Donoghue 1 988, Davis and Nixon 1 992) . Put simply,
this approach appears to disregard the strengths of
prominent species concepts, and brings little or nothing
new to the debate. The ideal approach to these questions
under the BSC would evaluate whether significant gene
flow occurs when populations are in sympatry or
parapatry; in allopatry, although the BSC encounters
problems of applicability (Mayr 1963), other modern
species concepts would marshall diverse data sets to
evaluate whether populations are following independent
evolutionary trajectories (Wiley 1978). While we agree
that Asian birds are probably seriously overlumped,
and thereby would probably agree with many of the splits
that have been identified using this method, it is not
founded in any modern species concept and is probably
best regarded as an inadequate attempt to make simple
and operational an issue that is quite complex and
challenging.
112
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank M. B. Robbins for useful discussions on the topic.
REFERENCES
Collar, N. J. (1996) Species concepts and conservation: A response to
Hazevoet. Bird Conserv. Intemat. 6: 197-200.
Collar, N. J. (2006a) A partial revision of the Asian babblers
(Timaliidae). Forktail 22: 85-1 12.
Collar, N. J. (2006b) A taxonomic reappraisal of the Black-browed
Barbet Megalaima oorti. Forktail 22: 170-173.
Collar, N. J. (2007a) Philippine bird taxonomy and conservation: A
commentary on Peterson (2006). Bird Conserv. Intemat. 17: 103-
113.
Collar, N. J. (2007b) Taxonomic notes on some insular Loriculus
hanging-parrots. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 127: 97-107.
Collar, N. J. and Pilgrim, J. D. (2007) Species-level changes proposed
for Asian birds, 2005-2006. BirdingASIA 8: 14-30.
Collar, N. J. and Spottiswoode, C. N. (2005) Species limits in birds:
A response to Watson. BioScience 55: 388-389.
Davis, J. I. and Nixon, K. C. (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and
the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41: 421-435.
De Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M. J. ( 1 988) Phylogenetic species concepts
and species revisited. Cladistics 6: 83-90.
Helbig, A. J., Knox, A. G., Parkin, D. T., Sangster, G. and Collinson,
M. (2002) Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518-525.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J., eds. (2007) Handbook of the birds
of the world. Vol. 12. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Mayr, E. (1963). Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge: Belknap
Press.
Peterson, A. T. and Navarro-Siguenza, A. G. (2006) Consistency of
taxonomic treatments: A response to Remsen (2005). Auk 123:
885-887.
Remsen, J. V. J. (2005) Pattern, process, and rigor meet classification.
Auk 122: 403-413.
Wiley, E. O. (1978) The evolutionary species concept reconsidered.
Syst. Zool. 27: 17-26.
Zink, R. M. and McKitrick, M. C. (1995) The debate about species
concepts and its implications for ornithology. Auk 1 12: 701-719.
A. Townsend Peterson and Robert G. Moyle, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University
of Kansas, Lazurence, Kansas 66045 USA. E-mail: town@ku.edu; moyle@ku.edu
Subjectivity and space in evaluating species limits:
a response to Peterson and Moyle
N. ]. COLLAR
Peterson and Moyle (2008) are at a disadvantage when
the detailed paper setting forth my system of assessing
species status in allopatric taxa remains unpublished
(largely because, as Peterson and Moyle conclude, the
issue is indeed ‘quite complex and challenging’). I hope
this situation will soon change.
Even so, in highlighting subjectivity as a flaw in the
system I use, I think they miss a couple of fairly obvious
points. (1) All taxonomy involving allopatric forms is to
some degree opinion-driven. Even Helbig et al. (2002),
whom Peterson and Moyle praise, begin with this
acknowledgement, and a key difference between their
system and mine is simply that they give greater weight to
far smaller characters. They write that ‘taxa that differ
only slightly (e.g. in size or darkness of plumage) . . . are best
treated as subspecies’ and that ‘a single base substitution
in a DNA sequence, or a single barb on a single feather’,
even if consistently different between two populations,
are insufficient ‘to base a taxonomic rank’ . In other words,
opinion and subjectivity have just shifted to different areas
along the scale. (2) Collar (2006) indicated that the system
sets limits on the subjective assessment of degree
(‘strength’) of difference, and makes that assessment
transparent, so that others can see the process, judge it for
themselves and, if in disagreement, challenge it on the
basis of the detail provided. Although assigning a numeric
value to a subjective decision may not impart objectivity to
the process, it does allow an explicit, quantitative measure
of a necessarily qualitative assessment, and therefore brings
in a degree of standardisation and repeatability. It is
encouraging to see that Kirwan (2008) has found the system
helpful.
Peterson and Moyle follow an intriguing but difficult
line of argument on the issue of distance between
populations. My scoring system will in fact make allowance
for various types of spatial arrangement: so taxa in
parapatric arrangements and narrow hybrid zones earn
one score, and those in broader hybrid zones another.
However, I find it difficult to see how allopatric populations,
whatever the distance between them, can be treated in
more ways than one. Taxa spatially very far apart might
well be judged more reproductively isolated than closer
taxa; but taxa very close together (yet not parapatric) could
also be said to merit special recognition for having retained
their distinctiveness. So making allowances for degree of
geographic disjunction would, I think, be unworkable,
and far more open to the opposition of opinions than a
simple concentration on morphological and acoustic
characters.
I am happy to confirm my allegiance to the Biological
Species Concept (BSC). Judgements about the
reproductive incompatibility of allopatric taxa have, under
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
113
the BSC, necessarily been based on the strength of the
signals that individual characters are presumed to send.
All my system seeks to do is render this process more
consistent and open, and by requiring multiple characters
to be involved (something part-shared with Helbig et al.
2002) I believe this better equates with or provides real
surrogacy for the way the birds themselves must make
decisions about each other as possible partners; hence I
regard it as consonant with the BSC. I am glad Peterson
and Moyle recognise the intention to be ‘simple and
operational’. In many cases the more detailed scientific
studies that we would all like, whether biological,
ecological or genetic in nature, are likely to be a long time
coming. Meanwhile, there is a pressing need for rapid,
pragmatic, even-handed and intelligible taxonomic
evaluations in the face of overwhelming conservation
challenges in many parts of the world, and I hope that my
system may prove to be of service to this end.
REFERENCES
Collar, N. J. (2006) A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae).
Forktail 22: 85-1 12.
Helbig, A. J., Knox, A. G., Parkin, D. T., Sangster, G. and Collinson,
M. (2002) Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518-
525.
Kirwan, G. M. (2008) Studies of Socotran birds III. Morphological
and mensural evidence for a ‘new’ species in the Rufous Sparrow
Passer motitensis complex endemic to the island of Abd ’Al Kuri,
with the validation of Passer insularis Sclater & Hartlaub, 1881.
Bull. Brit. Om. Club 128: 83-93.
Peterson, A. T. and Moyle, R. G. (2008) An appraisal of recent
taxonomic reappraisals based on character scoring systems. Forktail
24: 110-112.
N. J. Collar, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U. K. Email: nigel. collar@birdlife. org
Rallus mirificus and Mimizuku gurneyi deleted
from the avifauna of Samar, Philippines
D. N. S. ALLEN and N. J. COLLAR
Collar et al. (1999) and BirdLife International (2001)
gave range extensions to the island of Samar, Philippines,
of Brown-banded Rail Rallus mirificus and Giant Scops
Owl Mimizuku gurneyi based on single specimens of each
deposited in the Philippine National Museum (PNM).
Both these specimens were collected in 1 959 at the Samar
Institute of Technology, Catarman (the rail in April, the
owl in May), both were considerable range extensions,
and both proved to be unique records for Samar. These
records were accepted by BirdLife International (2000),
which published a map for the owl shading in all Samar;
and a draft of the rail entry in Collar et al. (1999) was
made available to Taylor (1998), who mentioned and
mapped the Samar record, describing it as a vagrant there.
Speculation about the validity of these records led us
individually and coincidentally to reconsider the specimen
evidence, with separate visits to PNM in April 2007 to
examine the rail (DNSA) and the owl (NJC). In both
cases we conclude that misidentifications have occurred
based in part on the fact that neither bird is fully grown.
Brown-banded Rail Rallus mirificus (actually Slaty¬
breasted Rail Gallirallus striatus)
During a visit in August 1 999 to PNM to look at various
bird specimens DNSA noted that one of the 18 Rallus
mirificus in the collection was rather distinct. This
specimen, PNM 5972, was from Samar and had originally
been labelled as Rallus striatus (now known as Gallirallus
striatus). It is a male collected by G. L. Alcasid and T.
Oane at the Samar Institute of Technology on 28 April
1959 (although the label appears to show 1989). However,
this name has been crossed out by an unknown hand, and
the name Rallus mirificus added in pencil. Sure that the
original identification was correct, DNSA took photos of
the bills of the R. mirificus specimens for later reference.
Following the publication of the Samar record by Collar
et al. (1999), DNSA contacted NJC about the specimen,
but did not have a chance to look more closely at it until
April 2007.
According to the captions to Plate 1 3 in Kennedy et al.
(2000), G. striatus differs from R. mirificus in being larger
(averaging 243 mm vs 218 mm in total length) and by
having ‘chestnut on crown and neck only, and upperparts
more heavily spotted or barred with white’, while
immature G. striatus striatus is similar to the adult but is
‘darker, lacking spots and chestnut on upperparts’.
Kennedy et al. (2000:77) added for R. mirificus that
‘inconspicuous buff barring on upperparts [is] confined
to wings’. Taylor (1998) also referred to a different head
pattern and the less extensive barring on the underparts.
The Samar specimen is of the same size as the other R.
mirificus specimens and thus much smaller than typical
G. striatus. However, it differs in a number of features: the
bill is more parallel-sided and is expanded vertically near
the tip, whereas the bills of R. mirificus have a broader
base, taper evenly to the tip and are slightly longer; the
remiges have white V-shaped spots that form narrow bars
on the primaries, while specimens of R. mirificus have
plain, unmarked primaries, with pale barring mostly
restricted to the coverts; the crown and neck are brown
1 14
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
rather than the rufous-chestnut of most R. mirificus; the
back and mantle are also brown, streaked darker, and
lack the chestnut wash of R. mirificus.
These features, together with its small size, presumably
led to the re-identification of the Samar bird as R. mirificus,
perhaps by someone unfamiliar with the characters of
immature G. striatus striatus. It is worth noting here that
two of the correctly identified R. mirificus specimens had
themselves originally been labelled as G. striatus striatus.
However, in a number of major features the Samar bird
is much more similar to immature (and perhaps not fully
grown) G. striatus striatus, and should be regarded as
such.
Giant Scops Owl Mimizuku gurneyi (actually
Philippine Eagle Owl Bubo philippensis)
In the 'Remarks’ section of their entry for this species,
Collar et al. (1999) reported ‘The specimen from Samar
is very much larger than birds from Mindanao (to the
extent that it was originally labelled as Bubo philippensis
and only re-identified in the late 1 960s by J. T. Marshall),
and must represent an undescribed taxon. ’ Label data on
this bird were taken by NJC in April 1996 and subsequently
incorporated into Collar et al. (1999), and a small series
of photographs taken at the same time were later forwarded
toE. C. Dickinson and thence to R. S. Kennedy for their
more expert consideration; fortuitously this all happened
too late for inclusion in Kennedy et al. (2000), and in fact
no further steps were taken to consider the identity of the
specimen.
d’he specimen in question, PNM 6035, bears three
labels, on all of which it is identified as ‘ Bubo mindanensis ’
(i.e. Bubo philippensis mindanensis), with various versions
of the core information that it is a female collected by
Alcasid and Oane at SIT (Samar Institute of T echnology)
on 21 May 1959. However, the third and perhaps most
recent label, with ‘Philippine National Museum —
American Museum of Natural History’ printed across
the top, has a handwritten pencil emendation to the name
Bubo mindanensis reading ‘ Mimizuku gumeyi JTM ’71’.
In April 1996 NJC assumed that ‘JTM’ was Joe T.
Marshall, who certainly visited the Philippines at very
roughly this time (although conceivably the skin was at
one time in the USA as the print on the third label indicates
a formal link with New Y ork) , and that his identification-
given his relevant expertise, most notably established by
Marshall (1978) — was correct.
According to Kennedy et al. (2000), nominate B.
philippensis is smaller and more rufous above than the
southern form mindanensis . PNM has only one
unequivocal B. philippensis, a nominate bird from Luzon.
PNM 6035 is decidedly smaller than this bird, but
decidedly larger than the PNM sample of Mimizuku
gumeyi. Four Mimizuku in PNM and one in the Natural
History Museum, Tring (BMNH), have bill mean 34
(range 31-37) mm, tarsus 50 (48-51) mm, wing 227
(218-239) mm, tail 119(1 14-125) mm, the single Bubo
p. philippensis in PNM and seven (all nominate) in BMNH
have bill mean 48 (45-52), tarsus 72 (67-78), wing 331
(302-345), tail 191 (174-203), and PNM 6035 has bill
40, tarsus 64, wing 260, tail 148. The feet and claws of
PNM 6035 are only slightly less powerful than in Bubo
but much more so than in Mimizuku. The bill is wider-
based (less laterally compressed) than in Mimizuku.
Everything therefore points to PNM 6035 being a four-
fifths-grown Philippine Eagle Owl Bubo philippensis
(IUCN status Vulnerable), the juvenile plumage ofwhich
is unknown (Holt etal. 1999, Konig etal. 1999, Kennedy
et al. 2000); Samar is already established as within the
range of the species (Collar et al. 1999). However,
following the breeding of Philippine Eagle Owls in captivity
(Warburton 2006, 2007) we defer publication of
descriptions of this plumage until fuller evidence can be
assembled; this might also validate or contradict the
assumption here that PNM 6035 is a B. philippensis.
CONCLUSION
Both Rallus mirificus and Mimizuku gurneyi are of
conservation concern, the former being Data Deficient
and the latter Vulnerable under the IUCN criteria
(BirdLife International 2001), and this re-identification
of specimens from Samar reduces the number of islands
from which they are known, suggesting that their
circumstances are somewhat more straitened than was
hitherto believed. On the other hand, evidence of Bubo
philippensis breeding on Samar was to be expected, so this
record does little to improve the species’s global
conservation status. While the value of museum specimens
to threatened species status evaluation remains
undiminished (Collar and Rudyanto 2003), this incident
certainly emphasises the need for closer scrutiny of
identifications on labels before range extensions of this
type are accepted. To be fair, however, what was
mistakenly being trusted in both these instances was the
pencilled emendations rather than the formal catalogue
identifications, which still apply to both specimens.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are most grateful to Mrs Lourdes Alvarez and Mrs Maria Josefa
Veluz for allowing us access to the material at PNM, to Robert Prys-
Jones for the same favour at BMNH, and to Jennifer Lewin and Tony
Warburton of the World Owl Trust for their great kindness in sending
on photographs of juvenile Philippine Eagle Owls.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona
and Cambridge, U.K.: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International.
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. (Third edition, part 3). Cambridge,
U.K.: BirdLife International.
Collar, N. J. and Rudyanto (2003) The archive and the ark: bird
specimen data in conservation status assessment. Bull. Brit. Om.
Club 123A: 95-113.
Collar, N. J., Mallari, N. A. D. andTabaranza, B. R. (1999) Threatened
birds of the Philippines. Manila: Bookmark, Inc., in conjunction with
the Haribon Foundation.
Holt, D. W., Berkley, R., Deppe, C., Enriquez-Rocha, P. L., Olsen, P.
D., Petersen, J. L., Rangel Salazar, J. L., Segars, K. P. and Wood,
K. L. (1999) Species accounts of Strigidae. Pp. 153-242 inj. del
Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the
world , 5. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, H. C. and
Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
115
Konig, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.-H. (1999) Owls: a guide to the owls
of the world. Robertsbridge, East Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press.
Marshall, J. T. (1978) Systematics of smaller Asian night birds based
on voice. Om. Monogr. 24.
Taylor, B. (1998) Rails: a guide to the rails, crakes, gallinules and coots of
the world. Robertsbridge, UK: Pica Press.
Warburton, T. (2006) Wonderful Philippines news. World Owl Trust
Newsletter 32: 3-5.
Warburton, T. (2007) The Philippine Eagle Owls do it again. World
Owl Trust Newsletter 35: 22.
D. N. S. Allen, 97 Sussex Way, London N7 6RU, U.K.
N.J. Collar, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 ON A, U.K. Email: nigel.collar@birdlife.org
Birds of Jagdishpur Reservoir, Nepal
HEM SAGAR BARAL
Jagdishpur Reservoir is the largest reservoir in Nepal (at
2.25 km2) and is considered to be among the most
important wetland sites in the country (Bhandari 1998,
HMGN/MFSC 2002). In 2003, Jagdishpur was
designated a Ramsar site. Despite it being listed as a key
wetland, not much is known about its birds or other fauna.
The reservoir and its surrounds are believed to provide
important habitat for resident, wintering and passage
migrant wetland birds. A total of 37 wetland-dependent
bird species was found in fourvisits (DNPWC and IUCN
2003) and five globally threatened species have been
recorded including the Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos
javanicus (Baral and Inskipp 2005) . Other fauna recorded
here include the globally threatened smooth-coated otter
Lutrogale perspicillata and 25 species of fish (DNPWC
and IUCN 2003).
The 2003 National Wetland Policy of Nepal
encourages the biological inventory of important wetlands
sites in Nepal and the use of such information for the
conservation, management and wise use of wetlands
(HMGN/MFSC 2003). Ornithological surveys and
conservation awareness programmes for local
communities have been recommended as high priority
for the conservation of Jagdishpur (Baral and Inskipp
2005). Following these recommendations, I carried out
surveys in 2005-2006 to gather baseline information on
avifauna of the site, and to propose conservation measures.
STUDY AREA
Jagdishpur Reservoir (27°35'N 83°05'E, Fig. 1) lies at an
elevation of 1 97 m in the Kapilvastu District of Lumbini
Zone, southwest Nepal. This irrigation reservoir was
constructed over the location of Jakhira Lake and
surrounding agricultural land in the early 1970s. Arock-
Figure 1. Location and rough
map of Jagdishpur Reservoir,
Kapilvastu District, Nepal.
116
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
filled dyke surrounding the reservoir was constructed in
the early 1 980s. The reservoir is fed through a canal from
the nearby Ban Ganga River that has a catchment area in
the Churia Hills. Maximum water depth varies between
7 m in the monsoon and 2 m in drier months . The reservoir
is surrounded by cultivated land, which also holds large
numbers of birds (L. Gurung verbally 2006).
The reservoir bank is planted mostly with Dalbergia
sissoo and some Acacia catechu. Floating vegetation is
dominated by Nelumbo nucifera , followed by Hygrorhiza
aristata and Potamogetan nodosus. Submerged plants
include Naja minor , Ceratophyllum demersum and Hydrilla
verticillata. The reservoir margin holds Ipomoea camea
and Typha sp. Most aquatic vegetation is submerged,
with patches of the lake covered by floating species or
occupied by reed swamps.
METHODS
Surveys at Jagdishpur reservoir were conducted on 1 1
May 2005, 1 1 October 2005, 6 January 2006 and 23
March 2006. These visits were spread through the year in
order to assess seasonal status. All surveys were carried
out on foot. Each survey was conducted by two people,
one to identify and count the species and the other to
write down the data. The surveyors followed a fixed route,
starting from the main outlet sluice, then slowly walking
around the reservoir in a clockwise direction, and ending
at the start point. Surveys were carried out between 08h00
to 12h00, each walk typically lasting 3-4 hr. Birds were
identified using 10* binoculars and 20x spotting scopes.
Total counts were made of all birds in the reservoir, or
outside it but within 500 m of the dam. For species flying
in flocks, repeat counts were made and the highest count
taken. Informal interviews with members of the local
community were used to gather information on
conservation issues.
In this account, I follow Bhandari (1998) when
classifying species as wetland-dependent. For seasonal
status of species, I mostly follow Inskipp and Inskipp
(1991).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 108 bird species was recorded from the
Jagdishpur Reservoir area (Appendix), nearly half being
either winter visitors or passage migrants. Ten species
were seen on all four visits. Of these. Lesser Whistling
Duck Dendrocygna javanica was the most abundant, with
2,000 individuals counted in March. Other high species
counts included 6,000 Common Coots Fulica atra in
January, which is perhaps the highest count for this species
in the country. Twelve of the 25 most abundant species
are winter visitors or passage migrants in Nepal.
Winter migrants reached peak abundance in January.
Other species, mostly resident, were most abundant in
March. This may have been due to the lower water levels
and consequently higher food availability in March. In
addition, most smaller wetlands in the vicinity dry up at
this time of the year, and this may act to concentrate birds
at perennial waterbodies. Cotton Pygmy Goose Nettapus
coromandelianus, Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus
and Paddyfield Pipit Anthus rufulus reached peak
abundance in October — these are likely to breed in the
reservoir or its vicinity. A colony of Asian Openbill
Anastomus oscitans has recently been found breeding near
Lumbini (Gin 2008). May is usually a significant month
for passage migrants in Nepal but this is not reflected in
the numbers from Jagdishpur. There are records of
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus and Garganey Anas
querquedula on passage in May 2003 (Baral and Chaudhary
2003).
This survey adds 18 wetland-dependent bird species
to the Jagdishpur list prepared by DNPWC and IUCN
(2003). Six additional wetland-dependent species, not
found during this survey, have previously been recorded
(J. Cox in litt. to C. Inskipp, Baral and Chaudhary 2003,
Choudhary and Giri 2006). This gives a total of 61
wetland-dependent bird species for Jagdishpur (see
Appendix for a full list). An additional 57 species were
recorded in the reservoir area. The habitat appears
particularly suitable for ducks and other large waterfowl,
and less suitable for waders.
Several species, listed for the area by DNPWC and
IUCN (2003), were not observed during this survey:
Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus, Y ellow Bittern
I. sinensis, Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda and Indian
Spotted Eagle Aquila hastata (recently split from Lesser
Spotted Eagle A. pomarina: Parry et al. 2002). In total,
seven globally threatened species and three Near-
Threatened species have been recorded from the reservoir
(Appendix). Incorporating all available and reliable bird
information, the overall bird list for Jagdishpur comes to
1 1 8 species, including seven globally threatened species.
CONSERVATION ISSUES
During this survey, various disturbances, including bird
hunting, were observed. Other threats to the site include
unsustainable methods of harvesting fish and other natural
resources, siltation, deposition of detritus from aquatic
macrophytes, water pollution from agricultural chemicals,
and invasive alien species such as Eichhomia crassipes
(DNPWC and IUCN 2003). The dense aquatic
macrophyte vegetation indicates an advanced eutrophic
status and a high sedimentation rate.
Every year the reservoir is partially drained to collect
fish and other resources like snails and edible plants.
During this operation, the inflow of water to the reservoir
is lessened or stopped and outflow increased. Fishermen
working in the reservoir pump water out, often using
mechanised pumps. When the water level is less than
knee-deep, fish are caught with nets and by hand. Different
parts of the reservoir are drained at different times, and
in exceptionally dry years, the entire reservoir has
occasionally been completely drained to catch fish. The
reservoir also contributes apple snails Pila globosa and
water-chestnut Trapa bispinosa for food, cattails Typha
elephantina for mat-making, and Ipomoea camea for
fuelwood (D. Giri verbally 2006, L. Gurung verbally 2006,
HSB pers. obs.). Management of the reservoir to promote
biodiversity needs study. For example, partial draining
may have less of an effect than complete draining of the
reservoir. Draining will need to be carried out at those
times which minimise impacts on birdlife.
Although the site has been proposed as a bird sanctuary,
nothing has been done so far to achieve this. Local people
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
1 17
are reportedly interested promoting the area as a birding
and recreational destination (L. Gurung verbally 2006),
and this opens up possibilities of tourism-based
conservation. Such programmes at Jagdishpur could be
linked with the village tourism programme conducted in
other areas of Ivapilvastu district. However, care must be
taken to minimise disturbance to wildlife. For example,
current plans include promoting boating on the lake, which
is likely to increase disturbance levels.
Active enhancement of habitat quality may also be
needed, for example creating shallow mudflats and
Phragmites marshes, creating nesting islands, and installing
nextboxes. While carrying out these and other
conservation activities, care must be taken to avoid
potential conflict with local people, and various
stakeholders should be consulted, including the Village
Development Committee, the District Irrigation Office
and the Department of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the Oriental Bird Club (OBC) and the Ramsar
Convention Secretariat (RCS), for funding this survey. I thank David
Buckingham (OBC), and Pragati Tuladhar and Sandra Hails (RCS)
for their support and guidance. Dinesh Giri, Tika Giri, Dhan Bahadur
Chaudhary, Mark Mallalieu, Bhesh Raj Ghimire and Yub Raj Basnet
assisted in the field. Sharad Singh of Lumbini Buddha Garden Lodge
helped with logistics. I am grateful to Carol Inskipp for her support to
carry out this survey.
REFERENCES
Baral, H. S. and Chaudhary, B. (2003) A list of birds recorded at Jagdishpur
Reservoir, May 2003. Unpublished report submitted to Bird
Conservation Nepal
Baral, H. S. and Inskipp, C. (2005) Important Bird Areas in Nepal: key
sites for conservation. Kathmandu and Cambridge, U.K.: Bird
Conservation Nepal and BirdLife International.
Bhandari, B., ed. (1998) An inventory of Nepal’s terai wetlands. Kathmandu:
IUCN-Nepal.
BirdLife International (2008) Species Factsheets. Available at http://
www.birdlife.org. Accessed on 8 June 2008.
Choudhary, H. and Giri, D. (2006) A list of birds recorded in Lumbini,
Jagdishpur Reservoir and Khadara Phanta, November 2006.
Unpublished.
DNPWC and IUCN (2003) Information sheet on Ramsar wetlands:
Jagdishpur Reservoir. Unpublished report submitted to the Ramsar
Convention Bureau.
Giri, D. (2008) Largest breeding colony of Asian Openbill Anastomus
oscitans outside protected areas of Nepal. Danphe 17(1): 7.
HMGN/MFSC (2002) Nepal biodiversity strategy . Kathmandu: Ministry
of Forest and Soil Conservation, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
HMGN/MFSC (2003) National wetland policy 2003. Kathmandu:
Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, His Majesty’s Government
of Nepal.
Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1991) A guide to the birds of Nepal, Second
edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. ( 1 996) An annotated checklist
of the birds of the Oriental region. Sandy, U.K.: Oriental Bird Club.
IU CN Nepal (2004) . A review of the status and threats to wetlands in Nepal.
Kathmandu: IUCN Nepal.
Parry, S. J., Clark, W. S. and Prakash, V. (2002). On the taxonomic
status of the Indian Spotted Eagle Aquila hastata. Ibis 144: 665-675.
Hem S agar Baral, PO Box 12465, Bird Conservation Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. Email: hem@birdlifenepal.org
APPENDIX
A complete checklist, with counts, of birds recorded in Jagdishpur Reservoir. Counts are given for those species
recorded in four surveys in 2005 and 2006. For other species, the original source is given. Systematic order follows
Inskipp et al. (1996).
118
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
119
Endangered.
120
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
The taxonomic status of the three subspecies of
Greater Rufous-headed Parrotbill
Paradoxornis ruficeps
BEN KING and CRAIG ROBSON
Deignan (1964) lists three subspecies of Paradoxornis
ruficeps'. P. r. ruficeps , eastern Himalayas from Nepal to
north-eastern Arunachal Pradesh, India and south-eastern
Xizang, Tibet (Cheng 1987); P. r. bakeri, north-eastern
India hills south of the Brahmaputra River, extreme north¬
eastern Bangladesh, and south-eastern Arunachal
Pradesh, east to northern Myanmar and north-western
Yunnan, China, and apparently disjunctly in southern
East Myanmar and eastern South Myanmar; and P. r.
magnirostris in northern Laos and eastern Tonkin,
Vietnam. Clements (2000) and Dickinson (2003) concur.
There seems to be no hint of dissent from this arrangement
except from Robson (2007), who states 'differences
between races magnirostris and bakeri were very slight,
and former race of perhaps dubious validity’.
However, recent tape recordings by BK of P. r. ruficeps
in Bhutan (Thrumsingla National Park, c.27°19.3/N
91°7.7'E) and north-eastern Arunachal Pradesh (Mishrni
Hills, c.28°19.4'N95°58.TE),P. r. bakeri in south-eastern
Arunachal Pradesh (Namdapha National Park,
c.27°32.9'N 96°3 1 ,7'E) and P. r. magnirostris in northern
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Seconds
Figure 1. Comparison of the songs of the three subspecies of
Paradoxornis ruficeps. Note the striking differences between the song of
P. r. ruficeps and those of P. r. bakeri and P. r. magnirostris. The song of
ruficeps consists of sweet whistled notes while that of bakeri and magirostris
consists of one or two sharp introductory notes followed by variable
somewhat reedy whistled notes of differing timbre.
Vietnam (near Tam Dao, c.21°27.2'N 105°38.7,E)
suggest that this taxonomy should be revisited.
VOCALISATIONS
The song of P. r. ruficeps (Fig. 1) is a clear, sweet whistle
of 4-6 similar notes, tee-tee-tee-tee-tezu tripping down the
scale, each successive note at a slightly lower pitch. In
Bhutan the second note is often at the same pitch as the
first note or slightly higher. In contrast, the song of P. r.
bakeri and P. r. magnirostris is a more complex assemblage
of different-sounding notes: one or two short, sharp,
staccato introductory notes, followed by somewhat reedy
whistled notes, the final ones of which are prolonged.
These reedy whistled notes differ in timbre from the sweet
whistled notes of P. r. ruficeps. In south-eastern Arunachal
Pradesh, the song of P. r. bakeri (Fig. 1) could be
characterised as chip chip-iue-zve-zveeee-tooeeew, the last
note sometimes tooteeezv. The song of P. r. magnirostris
(Fig. 1) tape-recorded in northern Vietnam in 1997 is
similar to that of P. r. bakeri'. chip pezv-zve-zue-to-tooeeezv. A
variant song tape-recorded in northern Vietnam in 2004
started with two (interchangeable) sharp whit or tuk notes
followed by reedy whistled notes, tuk zuhit chewi-to-teeeezv.
Another variant song tape-recorded by Jonathan Eames
in northern Vietnam is superficially similar in structure to
that of P. r. ruficeps, but still has the sharp introductory
note and the reedy quality to the whistled notes of P. r.
magnirostris. Only the final reedy, downslurred whistled
note is missing. While showing a fair amount of variation,
the general structure of the songs of P. r. bakeri and P. r.
magnirostris is similar, including the sharp introductory
note(s), variable reedy whistled notes in the middle of the
song and (usually) final downslurred reedy whistled note.
Figure 2. Calls of the three subspecies of Paradoxornis ruficeps.
A raspy downward cheeiv and a hard rattle are shared by ruficeps and
magnirostris. The recording of bakeri Suggests the cheew note and a third
type of call.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
121
Table 1. Comparison of culmen, wing, tail and tarsus length of the subspecies of Paradoxomis mficeps. All measurements are in mm. P. r. baken
and P. r. magnirostris average larger than P. r. mficeps, but there is considerable overlap. P. r. magnirostris may average larger than P. r. bakeri, but
the small sample precludes conclusions. Standard deviations (s.d.) were not calculated for P. r. magnirostris because of the small sample size.
On numerous occasions (c.10 times), BK played the
song and calls ofP. r. magnirostris from Vietnam to flocks of
P. r. ruficeps in Bhutan. Very little response was seen by P.
r. ruficeps , i.e., they mostly ignored the recording and kept
moving on. After finally getting a tape-recording of the
song of P. r. ruficeps and playing it back to P. r. ruficeps (on
c.6 occasions), the response level was dramatic, i.e., they
came closer and sang more . W e have not attempted playback
of P. r. ruficeps song to P. r. magnirostris or P. r. bakeri.
The Greater Rufous-headed Parrotbill has several call
notes (Fig. 2), a raspy downslurred cheew and a hard
rattle, appearing to be common to all three subspecies.
More material is needed to detect any differences between
the taxa in the calls.
with the bright buff of the throat. In ruficeps there is a
slight rufescent tinge to the primaries and secondaries
which is entirely or nearly missing in bakeri. P. r.
magnirostris is barely distinguishable from P. r. bakeri by
being slightly darker above.
While P. r. bakeri (Table 1, Fig. 3) averages larger
than P. r. ruficeps, the large overlap in all measurements
would make it impossible to differentiate many specimens
of the two taxa by measurements alone. The small sample
of P. r. magnirostris indicates it may be somewhat larger
than P. r. bakeri, with a marginally thicker bill.
DISCUSSION
PLUMAGE AND MORPHOMETRICS
The most striking difference between P. r. ruficeps and P.
r. bakeri is the colour of the underparts: white with a buffy
tinge in ruficeps, and bright buff, with the centre of the
belly paler buff in P. r. bakeri. There is a sharp contrast
between the rufous cheeks and white throat of P. r. ruficeps,
while in P. r. bakeri the rufous cheeks contrast much less
17.5
17
16.5
E
E
SZ
D)
S 16
c
<u
E
a
O
15.5
15
14.5
77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95
Wing (mm)
Figure 3. Scatterplot comparing culmen (from skull) and wing
(flattened) lengths of Paradoxomis r. ruficeps and P. r. bakeri. While
P. r. bakeri averages larger, there is considerable overlap.
i — 1 — 1 — 1 — i — ■ — 1 — • — i — 1 — 1 — * — i — * — 1 — « — r
The songs of P. r. bakeri and P. r. magnirostris are strongly
and consistently different from that of P. r. ruficeps. While
ruficeps responds dramatically to its own song, it responds
very little to playback of the song of magnirostris.
Furthermore, specimens of bakeri and magnirostris can be
readily distinguished from those of ruficeps by their
distinctive plumage. Thus we propose that ruficeps and
bakeri be considered distinct species and that magnirostris
be treated as a subspecies of bakeri. We would expect that
the strikingly different songs and distinct plumages of P.
r. ruficeps and P. r. bakeri (plus P. r. magnirostris ) would
provide sufficient isolating mechanisms should these forms
be sympatric, satisfying the biological species concept for
separate species. Moreover, the distinct plumages (and
songs) offer 100% diagnosibility to satisfy the phylogenetic
species concept.
Ali and Ripley (1971) and Ripley (1982) state that P.
r. ruficeps ranges east to the Dibang River in north-eastern
Arunachal Pradesh, and P. r. bakeri lives east of the Dibang
River. BK observed and tape-recorded P. r. ruficeps near
Hunli in the Mishmi Hills at c.28°19.4'N 95°58.TE at
c. 1,100 m on 19 November 2004. This site is a few
kilometres east of the Dibang River, thus eliminating the
Dibang River as a boundary between P. r. ruficeps and
P. r. bakeri. Ripley (1941) failed to find either taxon in the
Lohit River drainage somewhat farther east in the Mishmi
Hills. Further fieldwork is necessary to define the ranges
of these two taxa more clearly and to determine if svmpatry
occurs.
We propose that the English name Rufous-headed
Parrotbill be used for P. bakeri (including P. b. magnirostris)
and the name White-breasted Parrotbill for P. ruficeps.
The white breast is the best field mark to distinguish P.
ruficeps from both P. bakeri and P. atrosuperciliaris. We
would further suggest that the English name Pale-billed
Parrotbill be introduced for Paradoxomis atrosuperciliaris,
to indicate its best fieldmark for separation from P. mficeps
and P. bakeri in the field. These names would shorten the
long-winded names currently in use, i.e., Greater Rufous-
122
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
headed Parrotbill and Lesser Rufous-headed Parrotbill,
and would improve the field utility of the names.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Jeff Groth prepared the sonograms. John Fitzpatrick and GregBudney,
of the Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds at the Cornell Laboratory
of Ornithology, provided tape-recording equipment and other assistance.
We thank Jonathan Eames for the use of his tape recording of P. r.
magnirostris. All the other recordings were made by Ben King and will
be deposited at the Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds at the Cornell
Laboratory of Ornithology. Reet Hazarika of International Ventures
and Travel, Pvt. Ltd., Delhi, provided logistical support for the trips to
the Mishmi Hills in north-eastern Arunachal Pradesh and Namdapha
National Park in south-eastern Arunachal Pradesh. Etho Metho,
Thimpu, operated the Bhutan trips. The Vietnam trips were operated
by Asian Trails, Bangkok.
REFERENCES
Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1948) The birds of the Mishmi Hills. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 48(1): 1-37.
All, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1971) Handbook of the birds of India and
Pakistan , together with those of Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, and Ceylon.
Vol. 6. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Cheng Tso-hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing,
Hamburg and Berlin: Science Press and Paul Parey Scientific
Publishers.
Clements, J. (2000) Birds of the world: a checklist. 5th ed. Vista,
California: Ibis.
Deignan, H. G. (1964) Subfamily Panurinae. Pp. 430-442, in Mayr,
E. and Paynter, R. A. eds. Checklist of birds of the world. Vol. 10.
Cambridge, Mass.: Museum of Comparative Zoology.
Dickinson, E. C. ed. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist
of the birds of the world. 3rd ed. London and Princeton, New
Jersey: Oxford University Press and Princeton University Press.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia: the
Ripley guide. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Ripley II, S. D. (1982). A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan:
together with those of Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
2nd ed. Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society.
Robson, C. (2000) . A field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London:
New Holland Publishers.
Robson, C. (2007) Parrotbills (Paradoxornithidae). Pp. 292-320 in
J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, eds, Handbook of the birds
of the world, Vol. 12. Barcelon, Spain: Lynx Edicions.
Ben King, Ornithology > Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 1 0024
U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthlink.net
Craig Robson, 63 Stafford St., Norwich NR2 3BD, U.K. Email: craiger@ntlworld.com
Vocalisations of the Togian Boobook Ninox burhani
BEN KING
Indrawan and Somadikarta (2004) described the Togian
Boobook Ninox burhani from the Togian Islands in the
Gulf ofTomini in central Sulawesi, Indonesia. While they
gave a description of the song, they did not make tape
recordings and apparently did not knowingly hear the
alarm call. I spent the night of 18/19 September 2005
searching for and tape-recording this species in the low
forested hills just outside the town of Batudaka on
northeastern Batudaka Island, the westernmost of the
larger islands of the Togian group at 00°26.460'S 121°
51.456'E, at an elevation of 121 m. I first heard one of
these owls calling faintly at about 19h30, about an hour
after sunset, but I was initially unable to get a loud enough
recording to elicit vocal response or approach. Eventually
I obtained high-quality recordings of nearby birds giving
both song and alarm call by about 04h30, and got good
looks at a presumed pair by flashlight. I heard another six
individuals that night, which suggests that the owl is
common on Batudaka Island.
The habitat was degraded secondary broadleaf
evergreen forest from which most of the original large
trees had been removed. The weather was clear and calm.
The first songs heard at 1 9h30 were faint and infrequent.
During the first 4-5 hours of my search, I tried to get
closer to two birds that called a few times and obtained
only a very faint tape recording, to which I got no response
after playback. After midnight the owls began calling more
frequently and I eventually got close enough to a calling
owl to make a louder tape recording. Once I made the
louder recording I played it back to the same bird c.30
times over a period of two hours, shifting my position in
relation to the owl several times. In this period the bird
2
1
TT
x o
^ 2
>,
o
=3
cr
CD 0
LL 2
1
0
0 12 3
Seconds
Figure 1. The song of the Togian Boobook Ninox burhani is a throaty
grating croak kuk kuk-kukukuk, the first note often a double note,
kukuk.
T - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 — 1 — i - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - r
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
123
0
2
1
TT
x o
2
>
o
<5 1
c r
2 0
U_ 2
1
0
2
1 H
0
0
-i - ; - i - 1 - 1 - r
1 2
Seconds
Figure 2. Vocalisations of Togian Boobook Ninox burhani. The top
line of the sonogram illustrates the alarm notes of two birds, presumably
a pair, responding to playback of their calls. Following the calls down
the figure from the top, shows a gradual (some calls left out) transition
from the alarm call to the song.
moved several times, but not closer. In each instance, the
owl responded with the notes that I infer are the song
(Fig. 1 ) . Finally the presumed pair flew in close overheard
and made the different loud calls that I assume to be the
alarm call (Fig. 2). Over time, the owls appeared to calm
down and they then gradually shifted from the alarm call
back to the song. During the next hour, I played back
c.5 times the series of alarm notes grading into the song
and each time this elicited the same response, i.e., alarm
calls gradually grading into the song.
The song (Fig. 1 ) is a throaty, grating kuk kuk-kukukuk,
the first note often a double note. The alarm note (Fig.
2) is a throaty grating croak nmrr-wa-waak. Fig. 2 (song
and alarm notes) shows the calls of two birds, presumably
a pair. The presumed female song and alarm notes are
similar to that of the male. Only two types of vocalisations
were heard. The one I assume is the song was uttered by
all eight individuals heard. The second vocalisation, which
I assume is an alarm note, was uttered only by the assumed
pair that was put under stress by close playback of their
song.
Fig. 3 shows sonograms of the songs of all six species
of Ninox owls known from Sulawesi and its satellite islands
(White and Bruce 1986, Rasmussen 1999, and King
2002): Togian Boobook, Rufous Boobook (also known
as Cinnabar Hawk-Owl) N. ios, Speckled Boobook N.
punctulata, Northern Boobook N. japonica, Chocolate
BoobookN. randz'and Ochre-bellied Boobook iV. ochracea.
This allows comparison and illustrates how different the
song of the T ogian Boobook is from the other Ninox owls
in the Sulawesi region. These sonograms and descriptions
may also assist field identification. For a discussion of the
systematics of N. scutulata, N. japonica and N. randi, see
King (2002).
The provenance of these recordings is as follows. The
Rufous Boobook was recorded on Gunong Ambang in
North Sulawesi on 15 September 2000 at c.04h30 at
00°46.344'N 124°23.484'E, elevation 1,354 m. The
Speckled Boobook was recorded in the Dongi Dongi area
of Lore Lindu National Park in Central Sulawesi on 19
July 1985 at c.21h00 at 01°14.637'S 1 20°1 3. 1 97'E,
elevation 990 m. The Chocolate Boobook was recorded
on Karakalong Island of the Talaut group of islands on 2
September 1997 at c.20h00 at c.04°12'N 126°47'E,
elevation c. 1 0 m. The Northern Boobook was recorded in
Toyohashi Park in Toyohashi City in Honshu, Japan on
13June 1983atc.20h00atc.34°39'N, 137°36'E, elevation
unknown. The Ochre-bellied Boobook was recorded in
the Kosingolan area of Bogani Nani Wartabone (then
DumogaBone) National Park on 5 August 1987 atc.l9h30
at 00°30.924'N 123°56.373,E, elevation 205 m. All these
owls called spontaneously, allowing me to tape-record
N
I
JsC
>>
O
c:
CD
=3
c r
CD
Ninox punctulata
Central Sulawesi
m rn rr r\ r\
0.5
Seconds
1.0
Figure 3. Comparison of the songs of all six species of Ninox owls
known from Sulawesi and its satellite islands. Speckled Boobook N.
punctulata: loud, fairly high-pitched volley of 20-25 too notes uttered
at a rate of c.5 per second, often 8 volleys per minute, 2-8 seconds
between volleys. Togian Boobook N. burhani: throaty, grating kuk kuk-
kukukuk, the first note often a double note. Northern Boobook N.
japonica: mellow-hollow couplet (sometimes triplet) whoop whoop , often
repeated in a long series. Chocolate Boobook N. randi : similar couplet
to Northern Boobook, but somewhat lower pitched, each note falling
slightly in pitch and more closely spaced, often in a long series. Rufous
Boobook N. ios: ‘hard wruck wruck', similar to ‘the alarm call notes of
Large-tailed Nightjar Caprimulgus macrourus’ (King 2005). Ochre-
bellied Boobook TV. ochracea: ‘mellow hollow couplet zohoo-whoooo, the
second note with a raspy quality’ (King 2005).
124
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
them. Playback of their vocalisations brought them closer
for better recordings.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank Mr Gerard (Herry) Najoan for assisting me in many
ways on the trip. Jeff Groth prepared the sonograms. John Fitzpatrick
and Greg Budney, of the Macaulay Library of Natural Sounds (where
all of my tape recordings will eventually be deposited) at the Cornell
Laboratory of Natural Sounds, provided tape recording equipment
and other assistance.
REFERENCES
Indrawan, M. and Somadikarta, S. (2004) A new hawk-owl from the
Togian Islands, GulfofTomini, central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bull.
Brit. Om. Club 124(3): 160-171.
King, B. (2002) Species limits in the Brown Boobook, Ninox scutulata
complex. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 122(4): 250-257.
King, B. (2005) The song of Cinnabar Hawk-Owl Ninox ios in North
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forktail 21: 173-174.
Rasmussen, P. C. (1999) A new species of hawk-owl Ninox from North
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 1 1 1 (4): 457-464.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia. Checklist No.
7. London: British Ornithologists’ Union.
Ben King, Ornithology > Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 1 0024
U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthIink.net
Territorial behaviour of Northern Boobook Ninox
japonica, on Calayan Island, northern Philippines
BEN KING and NICKY ICARANGAL
King (2002) recommended that the Northern Boobook
Ninox japonica, of north-eastern Asia, and Chocolate
Boobook N. randi, of the Philippines and the Talaut
Islands of northern Indonesia, be considered species
separate from the Brown Boobook Ninox scutulata, and
presented sonograms and descriptions of their distinctive
songs. Dickinson etal. (1991) listed the Northern Boobook
as occurring in a number of localities throughout the
Philippines, including Calayan, but said nothing about
its status, while Kennedy et al. (2000) repeated the
localities and called it a migrant.
We have spent hundreds of hours at night searching
for owls on the main islands of the Philippines (Luzon,
Mindoro, Palawan, Cebu, Panay, Negros, Bohol, Samar,
Mindanao and Tawi-Tawi) and have never heard the
Northern Boobook vocalise there. Further, BKhas spent
hundreds of night hours searching for owls in other parts
of the wintering range of the Northern Boobook (Thailand,
Vietnam, Malaysia, Sumatra, Kalimantan, Java, Sulawesi
and Flores; Vaurie 1965, White and Bruce 1986) and
never heard it vocalise there. Further, we are unaware of
any published or unpublished record of Northern
Boobook heard spontaneously vocalising outside its
breeding range. Thus it appears likely that the Northern
Boobook does not spontaneously vocalise in the areas
where it is a migrant and winter visitor. The
characterisation in Kennedy et al. (2002) of the species as
a migrant in the Philippines is therefore likely correct.
Vaurie (1965) listed the southern subspecies of the
Northern Boobook Ninox japonica totogo as breeding and
apparently resident on the Ryu Kyu Islands, T aiwan, and
Lanyu (Botel T obago) , and stated that it probably breeds
on the small islands between Taiwan and Luzon. We
visited Calayan Island (196 km2, c. 70 km north of Luzon’s
Seconds
Figure 1. Comparison of songs of Northern Boobook Ninox japonica from Calayan, Japan and Taiwan. The call notes (on right) were uttered
by a highly agitated bird.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
125
northern tip) in the Babuyan Islands of Cagayan Province,
northern Philippines, from 20 to 26 March 2005, at which
time the weather was mostly fair with a few rain showers.
Northern Boobooks on Calayan were spontaneously
highly vocal between c.45 minutes after sunset until c.45
minutes before sunrise. At 19°19.404'N 121°27.010,E,
elevation 290 m, we tape-recorded their songs in a large
patch of low primary forest (with some trees removed),
interspersed with a few clearings for cultivation, and
secondary forest.
The song and a call note that we recorded on Calayan
are shown in Fig. 1 , along with songs recorded on Taiwan
and Japan. The Calayan song is similar to those recorded
on Taiwan and Japan. However, the internote interval of
the Taiwan and Calayan birds is longer than that of
Japanese birds and could represent a difference between
the two taxa (N. j. totogo on Taiwan and N. j. japonica on
the main islands of Japan). However, our sample size is
too small to permit analysis of variation, either within or
between taxa. Further study is recommended on this
question. The call (likely an alarm note) , which was uttered
by a very agitated bird in response to playback, was a
short, thin, somewhat metallic yelp, wuk or wut, at a
higher pitch than the song.
Once we tape-recorded the spontaneously vocalising
Northern Boobook (only one bird was calling initially)
we played back the recording 1 5-20 times over the course
of an hour. With each playback the pair of owls became
more agitated and called louder and more frequently.
This strong response to playback suggests territoriality of
a well-established pair of owls. As the Northern Boobook
is not known to spontaneously vocalise outside its breeding
grounds, this behavior strongly suggests that the boobooks
breed on Calayan Island. While probable breeding does
not prove residency, we expect that the Northern Boobook
is resident on Calayan. A reassessment of the specimens
of Ninox japonica taken on Calayan might help to resolve
the issues of residency and subspecific identification.
It is thus likely that breeding (and possibly residency)
of the Northern Boobook in the Philippines is limited to
the small islands north of Luzon (the taxon N. j. totogo ),
while migrant N. j. japonica is a migrant or winter visitor
to the whole of the Philippines (Kennedy et al. 2000).
The Elegant Scops Owl Otus elegans has a similar range
to that of N. j. totogo, and is represented on Calayan by a
resident race, O. e. calayensis, endemic to the Batan and
Babuyan Islands, north of Luzon. This species was also
spontaneously vocal during our visit.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank the mayor, Joseph Llopis, of Poblacion, Calayan, for
his gracious hospitality and generous assistance throughout our stay on
the island.
REFERENCES
Dickinson, E. C., Kennedy, R. S. and Parkes, K. C. (1991) The birds
of the Philippines: an annotated checklist. Tring, U.K.: British
Ornithologists’ Union.
Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, Jr., H. C.
and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines.
Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
King, B. (2002) Species limits in the Brown Boobook Ninox scutulata
complex. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 122(4): 250-257.
Vaurie, C. (1965) The birds of the Palearctic fauna: A systematic reference,
Non-Passeriformes. London: Witherby.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea (Sulawesi,
the Moluccas and the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia. Checklist No.
7. London: British Ornithologists’ Union.
Ben King, Ornithology Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 1 0024
U.S.A. Email: kingbirdtours@earthlink.net
Nicky Icarangal, 319 Candelaria Street, Balian, Pangil, Laguna, 4018 Philippines. Email: nicarangal@yahoo.com
Records oiRhizothera ( longirostris ) dulitensis in Sabah
G.W. H. DAVISON
The Long-billed Partridge Rhizothera longirostris was first
collected in Sabah at Paitan, near the north-east coast, by
A. H. Everett in 1 892. The specimen, long overlooked by
authorities such as Moulton (1914) and Smythies (1957,
1960, 1981), still resides in the American Museum of
Natural History (Sheldon et al. 2001). In the meantime,
the species was listed by Comber (1971) from Tenom,
Sabah, and was recorded at Danum Valley from field
observations by Showier (1993). The species is confined
to the Sundaic lowlands of south T enasserim in Myanmar,
peninsular Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Malaysian
Borneo (Sabah and Sarawak), Brunei, and Kalimantan
and Sumatra in Indonesia, and is considered Near
Threatened (BirdLife International 2001).
Another taxon from Borneo, Rhizothera dulitensis, was
described as a full species by Ogilvie-Grant (1895), but
demoted to subspecies level as R. longirostris dulitensis by
Peters (1934) who was followed by subsequent authors.
It is distinguished by a broader grey breast band in males
(c.10 cm vs 6 cm broad), and in both sexes by a whitish
instead of rufous upper belly, darker upperparts, and more
vermiculations on the greater secondary coverts and
secondaries (Davison 1999). It is known from three
localities in the eastern part of Sarawak: Mount Murud,
Mount Dulit and Batu Song (Smythies 1999). This taxon
was raised to species rank again by Davison (1999) and
by Davison in Smythies (1999), usingplumage characters
that would satisfy the criteria of Helbig et al. (2002) but
126
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
possibly not those of Collar (2004, 2006) . This is because
the differentiating characters, though distinctive, are few
and might not reach the numerical total suggested by
Collar’s (2006) scoring system. The species level
distinction has been accepted by Dickinson (2003).
Common names used include Hose’s Partridge (Davison
1999, Dickinson 2003) and Dulit Partridge (Smythies
1999).
Whether or not it is given species rank, it was recently
found that this taxon is also represented by museum
specimens from Sabah collected by A. H. Everett, in this
case on Mount Kinabalu in October 1895 (Davison 2007).
The two relevant specimens, in The Natural History
Museum, U.K. (BMNH), are BMNH 98.12.8.75, an
immature female, and BMNH 1969.29. 18, an immature
male labelled as a female.
I recently located a third specimen of R. dulitensis from
Sabah in the American Museum of Natural History
(AMNH). This is AMNH 541976, a fully adult male,
also collected by A. H. Everett on Mount Kinabalu in
October 1895. The specimen shows the diagnostic broad
grey band on the upper breast, below which the remainder
of the breast and abdomen are silky off-white. No exact
dates are given on any of these three skins, but considering
the low frequency with which such birds are encountered,
and that they were all collected in the same month and at
the same locality, it is possible that all were members of
a family group out of which the two immatures in BMNH
were offspring of the bird now in AMNH.
AMNH 541976 resolves any doubt over the identity
of the two BMNH immatures (as immature plumage of
this taxon had not been described before), and confirms
the presence of this taxon in Sabah. In spite of Kinabalu
Park being one of the most intensively visited sites in
South-East Asia by birdwatchers, the species has not been
recorded there since 1895. This suggests it occurs in areas
of the mountain not visited by birdwatchers (presumably
lower than the height of the park headquarters at 1,600
m), or that birdwatchers have not been able to detect its
call, which is still unknown.
Adult males of this taxon, exemplified by AMNH
541976, are very distinctive, by virtue of the 1 0 cm wide
grey breastband, with silky off-white lower breast and
abdomen. Adult females show no breastband, and differ
from R. ( l.) longirostris in having orange confined to the
upper breast, fading to off-white lower breast and
abdomen. Both sexes also differ from R. ( l .) longirostris in
a range of subtle colour differences on the wing coverts
and flight feathers (Davison 1999).
The two specimens registered at BMNH are both
immature, at a very similar or identical stage of growth
(shown both by measurements and by stage of moult),
collected in the same month (conceivably the same day,
as the date was not recorded) and at the same locality. It
can be inferred that they are siblings from one brood or
family party. The very different museum accession dates
(1898 and 1969, based on their registered numbers) do
not relate to the field collection dates, and presumably
reflect the different dispersal history of skins from Everett’s
collections, the 1969 accession having been obtained by
BMNH via the Hewitt skin collection.
Specimen 98.12.8.75 is a female as labelled. The
feathers of the chin and throat are light ginger chestnut
(female character), each feather having a buff shaft streak,
stronger on the throat (immature character) . This colour
pattern continues uniformly down the breast, breaking
up into scattered plain orange-buff feathers on the flanks
and there is no trace of grey below (female characters) . At
the sides of the breast some feathers have differing amounts
of dark brown vermiculations (immature character) . The
centre of the lower breast, abdomen and the lower flanks
are silky textured creamy buff (species character).
Specimen 1969.29.18 is probably an immature male
(not female as labelled) . The chin and throat are as above,
but duller and greyer (male character). The feathers at
the sides of the breast each have more (immature
character) and greyer, not dark brown vermiculations
(male character) . The orange-buff feathering extends less
far down the breast and is paler, duller and dirtier-looking,
giving way higher up the abdomen to uniformly pale,
sullied, smoky grey flanks, belly and vent (species
character).
The immature state of these two specimens is
demonstrated by their measurements, given below, and
by the following plumage characters. In both, the
supercilium above and behind the eye is broken into dark
brown feathering with buff shaft streaks . Buff shaft streaks
continue from the sides of the throat and breast round to
the hind neck and become wider. (In adults of both R.
longirostris and R. dulitensis these buff shaft streaks are
fewer, are not present on the hind neck, and tend to form
two braces down the mantle.) In both specimens the bill
appears to be rosy, paler towards the tip, with a dark line
along the ridge of the culmen. Both specimens have the
outer primary (P10) plain brown; P9 and P8 are
increasingly vermiculated with buff on the outer web.
The measurements of the three specimens (in
millimetres) are as follows. The immature female BMNH
98. 12.8.75 has wing 182, tail 47, tarsus 53, culmen c.21
and gape c.31 mm. The immature male BMNH
1969.29. 18 has wing 184, tail 48, tarsus 53, culmen c.21
and gape c.31 mm. The adult male AMNH 541976 has
wing 204, tail 86 and tarsus 60 mm, the bill not having
been measured.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Paul Sweet and the authorities of the American N atural History
Museum, and Mark Adams, R. Prys-Jones and the authorities of the
Natural History Museum, Tring, for access to specimens.
REFERENCES
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened, birds of Asia: the BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife
International.
Collar, N. J. (2004) Species limits in some Indonesian thrushes. Forktail
20: 71-87.
Collar, N. J. (2006) A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae) .
Forktail 22: 85-1 12.
Comber, J. B. (1971) Murut and Lun Dayeh bird names. Sabah Soc.
J. 5(3): 172-176.
Davison, G. W. H. (1999) Notes on the taxonomy of some Bornean
birds. Sarawak Mas. J. 75: 289-299.
Davison, G. W. H. (2007) The Dulit partridge in Sabah. Sabah Soc. J.
22 [‘2005’]: 105-110.
Dickinson, E. C., ed. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist
of the birds of the world. Third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
127
Helbig, A. J., Knox, A. G., Parkin, D. T., Sangster, G. and Collinson,
M. (2002) Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518-
525.
Moulton, J. C. (1914) Hand-list of the birds ofBomeo.J. Straits Branch,
Roy. Asiat. Soc. 67: 125-191.
Ogilvie-Grant, W. R. (1895) [Rhizothera dulitensis ]. Bull. Brit. Orn.
Club, 4: 27.
Peters, J. L. (1934). Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. II. Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Sheldon, F., Moyle, R. and Kinnaird, J. (2001) Ornithology of Sabah:
history, gazetteer, annotated checklist, and bibliography. Om.
Monogr. 52: 1-285.
Showier, D. A. (1993) Long-billed Partridge Rhizothera longirostris : a
new species for Sabah. Forktail 8: 156.
Smythies, B. E. (1957) An annotated checklist of the birds of Borneo.
Sarawak Mus. J. 9(24): 523-818.
Smythies, B. E. (1960) The birds of Borneo. Edinburgh and London:
Oliver & Boyd.
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Borneo. Third edition. Kota Kinabalu
and Kuala Lumpur: Sabah Society and Malayan Nature Society.
Smythies, B. E. (1999) The birds of Borneo. Fourth edition, revised by
G. W. H. Davison. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications
(Borneo).
G. W. H. Davison, National Parks Board, Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569. Email:
Geoffrey _Davison@npa rks.gov.sg
A re-evaluation of the status of Tawny Eagle
Aquila rapax in South-East Asia
J. W. DUCKWORTH, T. P. INSKIPP, E. PASQUET, P. C. RASMUSSEN, N. H. RICE,
C. R. ROBSON and D. G. D. RUSSELL
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax is usually listed as occurring
widely, if rarely, in South-East Asia, primarily the northern
parts. Robson (2005) considered the species (as A. r.
vindhiana) to be a vagrant to North, Central and South
Myanmar, North-West Thailand and West and East
Tonkin. Interpretation of past records of ‘A. rapax ’ is
hindered by the wide former treatment of Steppe Eagle
A. nipalensis as a subspecies of A. rapax (e.g. Vaurie 1965).
Moreover, review of the status of Bonelli’s Eagle Hieraaetus
fasciatus in South-East Asia (Duckworth et al. in press,
where the relevant specimens are depicted) found that
the two published historical specimens purportedly of A.
r. vindhiana from South-East Asia east of Myanmar were
both Bonelli’s Eagles. This accords with the statement of
Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) that Tawny Eagle has
been ‘reported as vagrant SE Asia (but non-migratory, so
confirmation needed) some specimens misidentified)’.
This note, therefore, reviews the status of Tawny Eagle
in South-East Asia.
Occurrence in Thailand is based solely on the specimen
of Meyer de Schauensee (1930), collected at ChiangMai
(18°47,N 98°59,E; at an elevation of 900 feet [c.300 m])
on 20 December 1928, and housed at the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP 87531). This is
a juvenile (first-plumage) Bonelli’s Eagle. Presence in
West Tonkin is based on the specimen reported by
Delacour (1930a, 1930b), a male collected at Sa Pa (=
Chapa, 22°20'N 1 03°50'E) on 1 4 December 1 929, housed
at the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris
(MNHN CG 193 1-1 51). This is also a Bonelli’s Eagle, in
its first winter. Various secondary sources citing
occurrence of the species in West T onkin are not explicitly
based on this record (e.g. Delacour and Jabouille 1940,
Dang Huy Huynh and Hoang Minh Khien 1995), but we
have traced no other original record from West Tonkin.
Occurrence in East T onkin was based upon a sight record
of H. Stevens (in Kinnear 1929: 121-122) that ‘a
magnificent eagle observed in heavy forest at Bao-Ha
could only have been Aquila nipalensis ’, about which
Delacour and Jabouille (193 1 : 78) opined, without giving
reasons, that ‘ we think rather that it was an H. r. vindhiana ’
[original in French] . This cannot now be accepted as any
species. There has never been any claim of occurrence in
Laos or Cambodia, although ‘ A . rapax ’ is sometimes listed
predictively (e.g. McNeely 1975).
The Central Myanmar record is based upon
Macdonald (1906), who wrote that the species was ‘rare.
The eggs were brought to me in December’. The lack of
explicit mention of a specimen of the bird itself urges
caution over this record and indeed Smythies (1940) wrote
that ‘ Aquila rapax vindhiana... is the commonest eagle of
India, but there is no proof that it occurs in Burma, apart
from one record based on eggs alone. For the present
therefore it is not admitted to the Burma List’. He later
removed his caveat over Macdonald’s information, giving
no explanation, but probably because after his first edition
he added that ‘there is one record from near Thayetmo’
(Smythies 1953, 1986, 2001). This latter, the source of
listings for South Myanmar, is based on Blanford (1895)
who stated that it ‘occurred] in Upper Burma near Thayet
Myo [19°19'N95°1 l'E],as there are specimens collected
by Oates in the British Museum’. One such specimen,
BMNH 1882. 1 .9. 1 6 (December 1871), is still there, but
has been re-identified as a Steppe Eagle, as have two
other Oates specimens once labelled as ‘ A . vindhiana
from around Pegu (= Bago; 17°20'N 96°29'E), BMNH
1882.1.9.17-18 (27 February 1877 and 20 November
1 876); these latter presumably caused Blanford’s mention
of multiple specimens from Thayetmyo through Oates.
Apparently the only other published historical mention
128
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
of the species in Myanmar, Harington (1909), merely
stated that Tawny Eagle is ‘locally resident in Upper
Burma’, no doubt based on Blanford (1895) and
Macdonald (1906). There is also a purported Myanmar
specimen in MNHN, mount CGI 879-5 34, which was
registered in the museum’s holdings in 1 879 and is labelled
only as ‘Birmanie [= Myanmar] , lac Sambbhur, Gerrard’,
Gerrard referring to the large taxidermy firm of Edward
Gerrard & Sons, London (see Morris 2004). The
consignment of birds acquired with this eagle (as shown
by the MNHN catalogue) originates from localities
ranging from India to Indonesia. We have traced no lake
of such name in Myanmar, but there is a productive bird
locality in India called Lake Sambhar (27°00'N 7 5°08'E),
spelt as ‘Sambhur’ by, e.g., Adam (1874). It is, therefore,
at least possible that the eagle originated from India: it
cannot be accepted as the sole specimen record for
Myanmar (and South-East Asia).
We have traced only one recent published record from
South-East Asia, from Myanmar: a single bird on 1 3 and
14 January 2000 at Indawgyi Lake (25°08'N 96°20'E),
stated to give ‘a very clear sighting’ (Van der Ven 2000,
Robson 2001). However, no confirmatory details were
given. A single was also recorded on 31 October 2005
near the village ofWarazup (25°48'N 96°39'E; c.250 m),
in the south of the proposed Hukaung Tiger Reserve,
Kachin State, Myanmar (Tordoff et al. in press., A. W.
Tordoff in litt. 2007), but in the light of the significance
of this record, A. W. Tordoff (in litt. 2007) now considers
it provisional. Following the sentiments of Rasmussen
and Anderton (2005), and given the history of
misidentification with this species in the region, until/
unless a diagnostic description is published for at least
one record, the species’s occurrence in South-East Asia
should be considered hypothetical.
In sum, we can trace no acceptable record of Tawny
Eagle from Indochina or Thailand: of the three records,
two were certainly misidentified and the other is now
unidentifiable. Occurrence in these countries is not even
particularly likely: A. r. vindhiana is the only Asian race
of the species, with a world distribution given by Dickinson
(2003) as ‘Pakistan, India and northern Burma [=
Myanmar]’. South-East Asia is bounded to the north by
the vast area of China: no Chinese Tawny Eagle records
(as distinct from those of Steppe Eagle) were traced by
Cheng (1987), and it has never been recorded in Hong
Kong (Carey et al. 2001). Although it is sometimes listed
for Korea, all known records refer to Steppe Eagle (N.
Moores in litt. 2007). Occurrence in Myanmar, which
lies closer to India, seems somewhat more likely, but even
so Tawny Eagle has never certainly been recorded in
intervening Bangladesh (P. M. Thompson in Rasmussen
and Anderton 2005), despite listing for the country by
some sources. Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) accepted
records a long way east in India; specifically, in the Natural
History Museum, Tring, U.K., there are four specimens
from Darjeeling (27°02'N 88°16'E) and one from Behar
(BMNH 45.5.19.2; presumably, the modern state of
Bihar). Although Tawny Eagle in India is
‘resident... mostly sedentary, with some local movement
after nesting is over’ (Naoroji 2006), the propensity of
large raptors to disperse long distances at least
occasionally, particularly as young, means that the
occasional occurrence of T awny Eagle in South-East Asia
must be a possibility.
In conclusion, therefore, observers should be aware
that any record of Tawny Eagle from South-East Asia
merits publication with supporting detail. The same
applies to any such specimen which may already be held
in a museum and not traced by us. Just as several records
historically referred to Tawny Eagle were in fact other
species, there may be South-East Asia specimens of
genuine T awny Eagles masquerading under other names.
The challenges of identifying the species should not be
underestimated.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank several correspondents for confirming that they know of no
records from several countries or areas: Philip Round (Thailand), Tom
Evans and Fred Goes (Cambodia), Geoff Carey (Hong Kong) and Nial
Moores (Korea); Jonathan Eames, John Howes and A. W. ‘Jack’ T ordoff
for further information relevant to recent sightings; various museums for
reporting, through requests on the AVECOL and eBEAC lists, that they
hold no South-East Asian specimens: Paul Sweet (American Museum of
Natural History, New York, U.S.A.), Kees Roselaar (Zoologisch
Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands), Ingvar Byrkjedal
(Bergen Museum, University of Bergen, Norway), Sylke Frahnert
(Museum fur Naturkunde, Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin, Germany),
Marcel Guentert (Natural History Museum Bern, Switzerland), Jean L.
Woods (Delaware Museum ofNatural History, Delaware, U.S. A.), Hein
Van Grouw (National Museum ofNatural History, Leiden, Netherlands),
Robert C. Faucett (University of Washington Burke Museum, Seattle,
U.S. A.), Iris Heynen (Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde, Stuttgart,
Germany), Jurgen Plass (Upper Austrian Museum), Anita Gamauf
(Museum of Natural History in Vienna, Austria) and Rene Corado
(Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology, Camarillo, California,
U.S. A.); and Ben King, Aasheesh Pittie, Praveen J., Robert Prys-Jones,
R. J. ‘Ted’ Tizard and two anonymous reviewers for advice.
REFERENCES
Adam, R. M. (1874) Additional note on the birds of the Sambhur Lake
and its vicinity. Stray Feathers II (4&5): 337-341.
Blanford, W. T. (1895) Fauna of British India, birds. Vol. 3. London:
Taylor and Francis.
Carey, G. J., Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader,
P. J., Leven, M. R., Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull,
M. and Young, L. (2001) The avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.
Cheng Tso-Hsin (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing:
Science Press, and Hamburg, Germany: Parey.
Dang Huy Huynh and Hoang Minh Khien (1995) [Zoological resources
in Sa Pa.] Pp. 342-347 in Dang Huy Huynh (ed. in chief), [Selected
collection of scientific reports on ecology and biological resources .] Hanoi:
Publishing House ‘Science and Technics’. (In Vietnamese.)
Delacour, J. (1930a) On the birds collected during the fifth expedition
to French Indo-china. Ibis (12)6: 564-599.
Delacour, J. (1930b) Note sur quelques oiseaux rares ou nouveaux
obtenus au cours de la cinquieme expedition en Indochine. L’Oiseau
11: 457-468.
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. (1931) Les oiseaux del’ Indochine frangaise.
Vol. II. Paris: Exposition Coloniale Internationale.
Delacour, J. and Jabouille, P. ( 1940) Liste des oiseaux de l’Indo-chine
frangaise, complete et mise a jour. L’Oiseau et la Revue Frangaise
d’Ornithologie 10: 89-220.
Dickinson, E. C. (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the
birds of the world, third edition. London: Christopher Helm.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
129
Duckworth, J. W., Round, P. D., Russell, D. G. D., Kasomdorkbua,
C. and Robson, C. R. (in press) Bonelli’s Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus
in South-east Asia. In Hernandez, V. J. (Ed.) The Bonelli’s Eagle.
Ecology, behaviour and conservation. Madrid: Tundra Ediciones.
Harington, H. H. (1909) The birds of Burma. Rangoon: Rangoon Gazette.
Kinnear, N. B. (1929) On the birds collected by Mr. H. Stevens in
northern Tonkin in 1923-24 (with notes by the collector.). Ibis
(12)5: 107-150, 292-344.
Macdonald, K. C. (1906) A list ofbirds found in the Myingyan district
of Burma. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 17: 184-194,492-504.
McNeely, J. A. (1975) Draft report on wildlife and national parks in the
lower Mekong basin. Unpublished.
Meyer de Schauensee, R. (1930) A further collection ofbirds from
Siam. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 81: 523-588.
Morris, P. (2005) Edward Gerrard & Sons - a taxidermy memoir. Ascot,
Berkshire, U.K.: MPM Publishing.
Naoroji, R. (2006) Birds of prey of the Indian subcontinent. London:
Christopher Helm / A & C Black.
Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia. The
Ripley guide. Washington D.C. and Barcelona: Smithsonian
Institution and Lynx Edicions.
Robson, C. R. (2001) From the field. Oriental Bird Club Bull. 33: 68-
78.
Robson, C. (2005) New Holland field guide to the birds of South-East Asia.
London: New Holland.
Smythies, B. E. (1940) Birds of Burma, first edition. Rangoon: American
Baptist Mission Press.
Smythies, B. E. (1953) The birds of Burma, second edition. Edinburgh,
U.K.: Oliver and Boyd.
Smythies, B. E. (1986) The birds of Burma, third edition. Liss, U.K.:
Nimrod.
Smythies, B. E. (2001) The birds of Burma, fourth edition. Kota Kinabalu,
Malaysia: Natural History Publications (Borneo).
Tordoff, A. W., Appleton, T., Eames, J. C., Eberhardt, K., Htin Hla,
Khin Ma Ma Thwin, Sao Myo Zaw, Saw Moses and Sein Myo
Aung (in press) Avifaunal surveys in the lowlands of Kachin state,
Myanmar, 2003-2005. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc.
Van der Ven, J. (2000) Myanmar expedition 1999-2000. Report, visit
January 2000. Unpublished.
Vaurie, C. (1965) The birds of the Palearctic fauna, a systematic reference.
Non-Passeriformes. London: H. F. and G. Witherby.
J. W. Duckworth, Wildlife Conservation Society Asia Programme, 2300 Southern Blvd, New York, NY 10460, U.S.A.;
current address: PO Box 5573, Vientiane, Lao P.D.R. Email: willduckworthdprk@yahoo.com
T. P. Inskipp, 1 Hemeside, Welney, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire PE 14 9SB, U.K. Email: inskipp@btintemet.com
Eric Pasquet, Departement Systematique & Evolution, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 51, 57 rue Cuvier, F
75005 Paris Cedex, France. Email: eric.pasquet@mnhn.fr
P. C. Rasmussen, Department of Zoology and Michigan State University Museum, West Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI
48824-1045 U.S.A. Email: rasmus39@msu.edu
N. H. Rice, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Ornithology Department, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway,
Philadelphia, PA 19103, U.S.A. Email: rice@ansp.org
C. R. Robson, 63 Stafford Street, Norwich, NR2 3BD, U.K. Email: craiger@ntlworld.com
D. G. D. Russell, Curator, Bird Group, Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Akeman Street, Tring,
Hertfordshire, HP23 6AP, U.K. Email: d.russell@nhm.ac.uk
First confirmed record of Alstrom’s Warbler
Seicercus soror in Laos, with comments on its status
in South-East Asia
NICK DYMOND
On 29 January 2005, I was birding in central Laos near
the village of Ban Naphong on highway 8, some 14 km
east of the main north-south highway 1 3, at an altitude of
c.200 m (at c.17°56'N 104°27'E). The area is dominated
by outcrops and spectacular ridges of limestone karst
which is the prime habitat of the restricted-range Sooty
Babbler Stachyris herberti. Near the village, I located a
trail leading into a narrow valley between two karst ridges.
There was closed canopy forest in the valley floor, but
more patchy, rather stunted forest with a broken canopy
on the karst slopes. At around 09h30 I ventured with
some difficulty some 20 m up the karst slope and soon
had the good fortune to come on a foraging party of five
Sooty Babblers. However, the knife-edge karst formations,
some of which were loose, and the deep crevices made
stalking the babblers extremely dangerous, so I retreated
a little and found a safe, but very uncomfortable, spot to
sit and wait.
Fortunately the babblers remained in the area and
were intermittently in view for more than 20 minutes.
During this period I heard sharp, high-pitched calls coming
from the valley-floor understorey just below me. I
recognised the calls as being those of Alstrom’s Warbler,
formerly called Plain-tailed Warbler Seicercus soror, and
using a Sennheiser microphone and Sony Walkman
cassette player I made a 50-second recording which
includes an irregular sequence of nine monosyllabic call-
notes and six disyllabic call-notes (Fig. 1). From my
precarious position I had several brief views of the single
calling bird in shaded light at ranges down to c.25 m,
although it was within earshot for at least ten minutes. It
had yellowish-green upperparts, greyish-green head with
130
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Figure 1. Sonograms of two calls of an individual Alstrom’s Warbler
Seicercus soror, recorded on 29 January 2005 near Ban Naphong, Laos.
dark grey lateral crown stripes, yellow eye-ring, bright
yellow underparts, and a hint of a broken yellow wing-bar;
I also had several glimpses of some white in the outer tail.
‘Golden-spectacled Warbler’ S', burkii sensu lato has
recently been split into six species: Bianchi’s Warbler S.
valentini , Whistler’s Warbler S. zuhistleri, Alstrdm’s
Warbler S. soror , Martens’s Warbler S. omeiensis, Grey-
crowned Warbler S. tephrocephalus and Green-crowned
Warbler S. burkii (Alstrom and Olsson 1999, 2000,
Martens et al. 1 999, 2002, Martens and Eck 2000, Olsson
et al. 2004, Packert et al. 2004; common names follow
Rheindt 2006). Field identification of this group using
plumage criteria is extremely difficult and usually
impossible. In the breeding season knowledge of the
distributional and altitudinal ranges together with
recordings of the songs and call-notes of each species
considerably reduces the identification problem.
However, the current knowledge of the winter distribution
of each species is far from complete, and usually the only
vocalisation given away from the breeding areas is the
call-note. Fortunately, the call-notes are much less
confusing than the songs.
Each of the six species has diagnostic call-notes, but
those of Alstrom’s Warbler are, to my ears, more distinctive
than the calls of the other five species. I describe the
monosyllabic call as a sharp, high-pitched tseet, rather
similar to the call of Pale-legged Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus
tenellipes, but less clipped and without the metallic tone.
This analogy is supported by U. Treesucon {in litt. 2006),
although P. D. Round {in litt. 2006) likens it to a truncated
Greenish Warbler P. trochiloides . I describe the disyllabic
call as a sharp tsit-dit. Other descriptions of the two calls
are tsrit and tsi-dit (Robson 2000) and ‘a short, rather
high-pitched, thin tsi(-)dit or, differently transcribed, tsi
(-) rit, occasionally a single tsrit ’ (Alstrom and Olsson
1999). It was these very distinctive calls that were given
incessantly by the single bird that I found near Ban
Naphong. Jesper Hornskov (verbally 2005) and Per
Alstrom {in litt. 2008) have heard the recording and concur
with my identification as Alstrom’s Warbler.
White-spectacled Warbler 5. affinis, a close relative
of the ‘Golden-spectacled Warbler’ complex, complicates
the identification problem as not only does its altitudinal
range overlap widely with that of both Alstrom’s Warbler
and Martens’s Warbler, but some populations of 5. affinis
can have yellow rather than the usual white eye-rings
(Olsson et al. 2004, Bairlein et al. 2006). However, all
forms of White-spectacled Warbler have richly developed
melodious songs and distinctive call-notes (Olsson et al.
2004, Bairlein et al. 2006, Rheindt 2006).
The complexities of ‘Golden-spectacled Warbler’
systematics had not been published when the Wildlife
Conservation Society of New York carried out numerous
ornithological surveys in Laos, largely during the 1990s,
nor when BirdLife International carried out surveys in
Vietnam, although most observers in both countries were
aware that splits were likely. The published reports of
those surveys list all relevant records as ‘Golden-spectacled
Warbler’. Thus my observation on 29 January 2005
constitutes the first confirmed record of Alstrom’s Warbler
in Laos.
The species breeds in China with apparently disjunct
populations, one mainly in Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces
in south-central China, and the other in Fujian, Zhejiang
and Jiangxi provinces in south-east China (Alstrom and
Olsson 1999, Bairlein et al. 2006, Rheindt 2006). It
occupies a lower elevation than its congeners.
In winter it is the commonest Seicercus warbler in
lowland areas of central and eastern Thailand, overlapping
widely with Martens’s Warbler at montane elevations,
including on Ivhao Soi Dao in the extreme south-east,
adjacent to the Cambodian border (P. D. Round in litt.
2006). In Cambodia it seems that only in the Cardoman
mountains in the south-west have any Seicercus spp. been
found, mostly Alstrom’s Warbler (P. Davidson and J. C.
Eames in litt. 2006), although there is at least one specimen
of Martens’s Warbler from the Cardoman mountains in
the Natural History Museum, Tring, England (P.D.
Round in litt. 2006). In Vietnam Alstrom’s Warbler has
been recorded fairly frequently in recent winters on the
Di Linh and Da Lat plateaux of South Annam, while one
at Cat Tien national park in the winter of 2005-2006 was
the first record for Cochinchina (C. R. Robson in litt.
2006). Grey-crowned Warbler and Bianchi’s Warbler
occur in northern Thailand, northern Laos and northern
Vietnam, but the reported occurrence of Grey-crowned
Warbler in Cochinchina (Robson 2000) is most likely to
refer to Martens’s Warbler which had not then been split
from 5. tephrocephalus sensu lato. Given this wintering
range, the occurrence of Alstrom’s Warbler in Laos is not
at all surprising and further records in central and southern
Laos can be expected.
ACKOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Jesper Hornskov and Per Alstrom for confirming the identity of
my tape-recording, Peter Davidson, Jonathon Eames, Craig Robson,
Philip Round and Uthai Treesucon for responding to my enquiries. Per
Alstrom for his help with producing Fig. 1, and Philip Round for his
most helpful comments on a first draft of this paper.
REFERENCES
Alstrom, P. and Olsson, U. (1999) The Golden-spectacled Warbler: a
complex of sibling species, including a previously undescribed
species. Ibis 141: 545-568.
Alstrom, P. and Olsson, U. (2000) Golden-spectacled Warbler
systematics. Ibis 142: 495-500.
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
131
Bairlein, F., Alstrom, P., Aymi, R., Clement, P., Dyrcz, A., Gargallo, G.,
Hawkins, F., Madge, S., Pearson, D. and Svensson, L. (2006) Family
Sylviidae (Warblers). Pp. 492-709 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and
D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 12.
Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Martens, J., Eck, S., Packert, M. and Sun, Y-H (1999) The Golden-
spectacled Warbler Seicercus burkii - a species swarm (Aves:
Passeriformes: Sylviidae), part 1. Zool. Abhandl. Mus. Dresden 50:
281-327.
Martens, J. and Eck, S. (2000) Der Seicercus burkii- Komplex im Himalaya
und China oder: Schatzen wir die Diversitat der Singvogel falsch ein?
Om. Anzeiger 39: 1-14.
Martens, J., Eck, S. and Sun Y-H (2002) Methods of systematic and
taxonomic research on passerine birds: the timely example of the
Seicercus burkii complex (Sylviidae). Bonn. zool. Beitr. 51: 109-1 18.
Olsson, U., Alstrom, P. and Sundberg, P. (2004) Non-monophyly of
the avian genus Seicercus (Aves: Sylviidae) revealed by mitochondrial
DNA. Zool. Scr. 33: 501-510.
Packert, M., Martens, J., Sun Y.-H. and Veith, M. (2004) The radiation
of the Seicercus burkii complex and its congeners (Aves: Sylviidae):
molecular genetics and bioacoustics. Org. Div. Evol. 4: 341-364.
Rheindt, F.E. (2006) Splits galore: the revolution in Asian leaf warbler
systematic. BirdingASIA 5: 25-39.
Robson, C. R. (2000) A field guide to the birds of Southeast Asia. London:
New Holland Publishers.
Nick Dymond, Springfield, Scousburgh, Shetland. ZE2 9JE U.K. Email: dymonic03@yahoo.co.uk
First records ofWallace’s Hanging-parrot
Loriculus flosculus from Rinca Island,
Komodo National Park, Indonesia
M. JERI IMANSYAH, DENI PURWADANA and TIM S. JESSOP
Wallace’s Hanging-parrot Loriculus flosculus is a small
parrot endemic to Flores Island, East Nusa Tenggara,
primarily in tropical semi-evergreen, and moist-deciduous
rain forest (250-1,000 m), at the west and eastern parts
of the island (BirdLife International 2003, 2004, Coates
and Bishop 1997) . This parrot is considered Endangered
because it has a small global range and probably a small
population which is threatened by ongoing conversion of
tropical forest habitats on Flores (BirdLife International
2001, 2004) . Here we detail two independent records (in
2003 and 2006) extending its range westwards to Rinca
Island, within Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Rinca
Island (205 km2) is dominated by monsoon savanna (55%
of land area), except in the south, which is predominantly
covered by tropical dry deciduous forest. The elevation
is 0-765 m. The island is separated from adjacent West
Flores by a narrow strait only 400 m wide.
At lOhOO on 28 April 2003, in Loh Dasami valley
(8°46'19.9'"S 1 19°39'15.6"E; atabout 1 0-20 m altitude),
two green parrots were observed in flight below the canopy
of coastal moist deciduous forest (Monk et al. 1 997) area
in the south of Rinca Island. The forest was dominated by
Pterospermum javanicum (Sterculiaceae), a tree that can
reach 25 m in height (Rudiharto 2006). The parrots were
followed to a roosting tree. The birds were estimated to
be c. 10-12 cm in length and the predominant colour was
bright green. They possessed a dark red nape, bright red
rump, red uppertail-coverts, and bright red bills,
confirming that these birds were Wallace’s Hanging-
parrots. They were readily distinguished from the
uniformly green plumage of the Rainbow Lorikeet
Trichoglossus haematoduis (race weberi , endemic to Flores
Island; Coates and Bishop 1997). Furthermore, we noted
differences in the plumage of the two birds, with one
possessing a red spot at the throat, whilst the throat of the
Figure 1 . Localities indicating the presence of Wallace’s Hanging-
parrot Loriculus flosculus on Flores and Rinca islands, Indonesia. The
map below is that of the Lesser Sunda region, within which Flores and
Rinca lie. Dashed lines show the boundary of Komodo National Park.
Solid circles indicate previous records of Wallace’s Hanging-parrot
while the solid square indicates our current observations.
132
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
other was entirely pale green, similar to the rest of the
ventral plumage. During these initial observations both
birds produced a distinct strrt strrt call. These
morphological and vocal characteristics are consistent
with descriptions for adult male (red spot on throat) and
female (red throat spot smaller or absent) Wallace’s
Hanging-parrot (Butchart etal. 1996, Coates and Bishop
1997).
We made further observations on nesting activities of
an adult male and a female on 12 April 2006 (09h00-
1 OhOO and 1 2h00-l 3h00), at the same location. The nest
was situated in a tree hollow (c.10 cm wide) in a dead
branch c.15 m above ground in a Terminalia catappa
(Combretaceae) tree. Male and female birds were
observed alternating in nest activities, and when one of
them was inside the nest hollow, the other bird was waiting
outside. Each bird spent c. 10-1 5 minutes in the hollow
at a time. The nest was in close proximity to several large
Ficus spp. (Moraceae) trees, a known food source of this
parrot (although we did not observe the birds feeding on
fruit) .
The closest known part of Flores Hanging-parrot’s
range to our observations is the western part of Flores
island which includes the areas of Golo Bilas, Wae Bobok
(Nggorang Bowosie, East of Labuan Bajo), Tanjung
Kerita Mese, Puarlolo, and Paku (Mbeliling forest, South
of Labuan Bajo, a proposed area for protected area
gazettement) (BirdLife International, 2003, 2004) (Fig.
1 ) . Our observations extend the western extremity of the
species’ range by approximately 27 km and also indicate
that this parrot can utilise suitable habitat close to sea
level, contrasting with observations on Flores, where
records have been above 250 m in generally wetter forest
types (Coates and Bishop 1997, BirdLife International
2003, 2004). Our observations suggest that it would be
valuable to survey a broader range of tropical forest habitats
at key sites such as Mbeliling and Nggorang Bowosie on
Flores for this species, and carry out a targeted survey for
this species on Rinca. Monitoring and nest surveys by
Komodo National Park staff would be valuable. Our
record also increases the number of parrot species
inhabiting Komodo National Park to two. The other parrot
species (so far recorded) is the critically endangered
Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphured. Komodo
National Park contains the largest remaining population
of the race C. 5. parvula (Coates and Bishop 1997, Birdlife
International 2004, Imansyah ex al. 2005).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Achmad Ariefiandy, Ibrahim Payung and Devi S. Opat for
their assistance during field work. Financial support was provided by
a Millennium Post Doctoral Fellowship from the Zoological Society of
San Diego (ZSSD) to TSJ. Approval for the research was granted
under a MOU between ZSSD and The Nature Conservancy (Indonesia
Program) and by the Indonesian Department of Forest Protection and
Nature Conservation (PHKA).
REFERENCES
Agista, D. and Rubyanto, D. (2001). Telaah aival status Kakatua kecil
jambul kuning ( Cacatua sulphurea parvula) di Taman Nasional
Komodo [ Preliminary study on the Yellow-crested Cockatoo (Cacatua
sulphurea parvula) in the Komodo National Park] . Bogor, Indonesia:
BirdLife Indonesia-PHPA. (In Indonesian.)
BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: The BirdLife
International Red Data Book. Available from http://www.rdb.or.id/
detailbird.php?id=125&sortby=latinname. Accessed on 25 April
2007.
BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD-
ROM. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.
Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Davies, C. W. N., Dharmaputra,
G., Dutson, G. C. L., Lowen, J. C. and Sahu, H. (1996) The
conservation status of forest birds on Flores and Sumbawa,
Indonesia. Bird Conserv. Internal. 6: 335-370.
Coates, B. J. and Bishop, K. D. (1997) A guide to the birds of Wallacea.
Alderley, Australia: Dove Publications.
Imansyah, M. ]., Anggoro, D. G., Yangpatra, N., Hidayat, A. and
Benu, Y. J. (2005) Sebaran dan karakteristik pohon sarang kakatua
jambul kuning (Cacatua sulphurea parvula) di Pulau Komodo,
Taman Nasional Komodo [ Distribution and characteristics of nesting
tree of the Yellow crested Cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea) on Komodo
island in the Komodo National Park], Report of the Zoological
Society of San Diego, Balai Taman Nasional Komodo, and
The Nature Conservancy, Labuan Bajo, Flores. Available from
http://www.komodonationalpark.org/downloads/
report_cockatoo_nest.pdf. Accessed on 25 April 2007. (In
Indonesian.)
Monk, K. A., De Fretes Y., Reksodihardjo-Lilley, G. (1997) The ecology
of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku. Singapore: Periplus Editions.
Rudiharto, H. (2006) Hubungan antara karakter habitat dengan densitas
Komodo [Relationship between habitat characteristics and density of the
Komodo monitor]. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Gadjah Mada
University, Yogyakarta. (In Indonesian.)
M. Jen Itnansyah and Deni Purwandana, Center for Conservation and Research of Endangered Species, the Zoological
Society of San Diego , Escondido, CA, USA, and Komodo Survival Program, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, Email:
ksp@kbproject. org
Tim S. Jessop, Center for Conservation and Research of Endangered Species, the Zoological Society of San Diego, Escondido,
CA, USA, and Dept, of Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Email: tjessop@zoo.org
Forktail 24 (2008)
SHORT NOTES
133
Tickell’s Thrush Turdus unicolor at Zhangmu,
Tibet Autonomous Region: a new record for China
YAT-TUNGYU
During a birdwatching visit to Zhangmu (also called
Zham, 27°59'37"N 85°58'00"E) in Tibet Autonomous
Region from 29 June to 2 July 2007, eight Hong Kong
birdwatchers including myself observed several Tickell’s
Thrushes Turdus unicolor. This species has not been
previously reported in China (Cheng 1987, MacKinnon
et al. 2000, Zheng 2005) and hence this is the first
documented record for the country.
Individual 1. At 09h30 on 30 June, a nondescript
grey Turdus thrush was noticed perched on a broken tree
c.70 m away from us. It was on an open slope c.20 m
below the tree line, and directly above some agriculture
fields. The thrush was smaller than a Eurasian Blackbird,
with overall grey body, except for a paler belly. I did
not observe the colour of the legs and bill, but other
observers reported them to be yellow. This individual
flew away as we approached and no photograph could be
taken.
Individual 2. While searching for the bird described
above, we found another Turdus sp. at a distance of c.50
m from us, and c.100 m from where we saw the first
individual. We were better able to examine this individual
because light conditions were better and we were able to
approach it to within 40 m and photograph it (Plate 1).
This bird had brown upperparts and whitish underparts,
and it had a distinctive long bright yellow bill. It also had
a whitish throat with indistinct malar stripes/streaks (Plate
1). We were able to observe this individual for only a few
minutes before it flew down the slope. I did not notice any
white on its tail in flight.
Because I could not identify these individuals to species
based on my experience of other thrushes in China and
Hong Kong, I looked up thrushes in Grimmett et al.
(2000), and realised that they looked very similar to the
Plate 1. Female Tickell’s Thrush at Zhangmu, China, 30 June 2007.
Tickell’s Thrush. Therefore, I set out to find these birds
again on the next day.
Individual 3. The next morning ( 1 July) at 07h45 I saw
a thrush perched on a branch c. 50 m from me and c. 1 km
from the area where the thrushes were seen the previous
day. The bird flew towards me and perched behind a
branch, where I was able to observe it closely and
photograph it (Plate 2). Part of its wing was clearly grey,
as were the unmarked undertail and vent. The eyebrow
and eye-stripe were very indistinct, but a thin yellow eye¬
ring is visible in the photo. The bill was yellow as was the
ankle (Plate 2). These features fit that of a male Tickell’s
Thrush.
DISCUSSION
Checking Grimmett et al. (2000) and MacKinnon et al.
(2000), I found that only Tickell’s Thrush fits the birds
described above. The female bird had an indistinct malar
stripe (Plate 1 ) that rules out all Zoothera and some Turdus
species that have been recorded nearby (i.e. White-
collared Blackbird T. albocinctus. Chestnut Thrush T.
rubrocanus and Kessler’s Thrush T. kessleri ) . A first-winter
female Dark-throated Thrush T. ( mficollis ) atrogularis
could be confused with a female Tickell’s Thrush, but
Dark-throated Thrush has a darker bill and legs and the
streaking on the breast is more extensive. In addition,
Dark-throated Thrush occurs in Nepal and Tibet only in
the winter (Grimmett et al. 2000, Lang et al. 2007).
Another extralimital species, Pale Thrush T. pallidus, could
also show features similar to a female Tickell’s Thrush.
However, my experience of Pale Thrush in Hong Kong
immediately suggested that what we saw was not a female
Plate 2. Male Tickell’s Thrush at Zhangmu, China, 1 July 2007.
134
SHORT NOTES
Forktail 24 (2008)
Pale Thrush because this species has distinctive white
spots on the tip of the tail, and its bill and legs are not
bright yellow. Identification of the male bird was more
straightforward due to its overall grey plumage and
bright yellow bill and legs (Plate 2). No other thrushes
have similar coloration in the plumage and the bare
parts.
Tickell’s Thrush is endemic to the Indian subcontinent
and has a discontinuous breeding range from Pakistan
through Kashmir to Nepal and western Bhutan (Grimmett
et al. 1998, Clement et al. 2000). It is a fairly common
summer visitor in Nepal and is known to breed in that
country just across the border from Zhangmu (Grimmett
et al. 1998, 2000), hence it is not unexpected for this
species to occur where we found it. Our observations
involved both male and female individuals, suggesting
that this species may breed in Zhangmu. However, we
did not observe any juveniles.
Zhangmu is in the southern part of Tibet Autonomous
Region and lies on the China-Nepal border but
information on the avifauna of the area is relatively scarce .
Some birdwatchers, both from other parts of China and
abroad are beginning to make other interesting discoveries .
Several Himalayan Bulbuls Pycnonotus leucogenvs, another
new record for China, were found here (Zhang etal. 2006)
and up to 11 Fire-tailed Myzomis Myzomis pyrrhoura
have been observed at Zhangmu in the winter (China
Ornithological Society 2006). With more visits by
birdwatchers, further new species are likely to be found
in this area.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Richard Grimmett for his comments on the identification of
these birds and Carrie K.W. Ma for her comments on an earlier draft
of this article. I am very grateful to two anonymous reviewers for excellent
comments that greatly improved this article.
REFERENCES
Cheng, T. H. (1987) A synopsis of the avifauna of China. Beijing: Science
Press.
China Ornithological Society (2006). China Bird Report 2005. Beijing:
China Ornithological Society.
Clement, P. and Hathway, R. (2000) Thrushes. London: Christopher
Helm.
Grimmett, R. Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998) Birds of the Indian sub¬
continent. London: Christopher Helm.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (2000) Birds of Nepal.
Princeton, New lersey: Princeton University Press.
Lang, A., Bishop, M. A. and Le Sueur, A. (2007) An annotated list of
birds wintering in the Lhasa river watershed and Yamzho Yumco,
Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Forktail 23: 1-1 1.
MacKinnon, J., Phillipps, K. and He F. Q. (2000) A field guide to the birds
of China. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
Zhang G. F., Lee, K. C., Chiang, M. L. and Cheng, H. F. (2006)
Himalayan Bulbul Pycnonotus leucogenys : a species new to China.
Pp. 409-412 in China China Bird Report 2005. Beijing: China
Ornithological Society.
Zheng, G. M., ed. (2005) A checklist on the classification and distribution
of the birds of China. Beijing: Science Press.
Yat-tung Yu, Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, G.P.O. box 12460, Hong Kong. Email: bfspoonbill@hkbws.org. hk
Forktail 24
2008
Guidelines for contributors
Forktail publishes original papers in the English language (also, in
certain cases, English translations of papers in Oriental languages)
treating any aspect of the ornithology (e.g. distribution, biology,
conservation, identification) of the region bounded by the Indus
River to the west, the Russian Far East, Korean Peninsula, Japan,
and Lydekker’s Line (i.e. the eastern boundary of Wallacea) to
the east, the Chagos Archipelago, Lesser Sundas, Christmas Island
and Cocos (Keeling) Islands to the south (see map in Oriental
Bird Club Bull. 31:7). Submissions are considered on the
understanding that they are being offered solely for publication
by the Oriental Bird Club, which will retain copyright. All
submissions are reviewed by referees and the Forktail Editorial
Committee, and those accepted are normally published in order
of receipt. (Some further indication of the type of material
appropriate for the journal is provided in the inaugural editorial,
‘The scope of Forktail’, Forktail 1: 3-5.)
Submissions should be sent electronically as an email
attachment to mail@orientalbirdclub.org. If this is not possible,
manuscripts may be sent on disk, preferably in PC format, to the
Senior Editor, Forktail, OBC, P.O. Box 324, Bedford, MI<42
OWG, U.K. In both cases, the text, tables, figure legends and
appendices should be combined as a single Word file. Figures
(maps, diagrams, images etc.) should be sent as high-resolution
scans in standard file formats (JPEG, TIFF etc.) or, if this is not
possible, originals may be posted to the above address. Maps
should be marked with a scale and north arrow. The approximate
position of figures and tables should be indicated in the margin of
the typescript. Papers should be concise and factual, take full
account of previous relevant literature but avoid repetition of
established information as much as possible; opinions expressed
should be based on adequate evidence. Titles of papers must be
accurate and concise, and (for the benefit of abstraction services)
include any relevant scientific (taxonomic) name.
Whenever possible, authors should consult an issue of Forktail
for style and layout. Spelling follows The shorter Oxford English
dictionary, except that external features of birds are spelt and
hyphenated in accordance with the entry under ‘Topography’ in
A dictionary of birds (1985). Spelling of placenames accords (unless
another source is specified) with the most recent edition (currently
11th, 2003) of The Times atlas of the world', we use ‘South-East
Asia’ and ‘Vietnam’. Localities with well-known other spellings
or older names should have these placed in parentheses after their
first mention. For localities too small to be in the Times atlas a
source of the spelling adopted should preferably be indicated and
the precise geographical coordinates provided (these should be
double-checked where possible). It is appreciated that authors will
not always have access to the above sources; in such cases the
editor will seek to introduce conformity.
English and scientific names of birds should follow those
provided by Inskipp,T., Lindsey, N. and Duckworth, W. (1996)
An annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental region. On first
mention of a bird both English and scientific name should be given,
thereafter only one, preferably the English. Scientific trinominals
need be used only if subspecific nomenclature is relevant to the
topic under discussion. These recommendations also apply for any
other animal or plant species mentioned.
Italics are used for all words of foreign languages, including
generic and specific scientific names. Metric units and their
international symbols should be used; if it is necessary to cite other
systems of measurement, these can be added in parentheses.
Temperatures should be given in the Centigrade (Celsius) scale.
Numbers one to ten are written in full except when linked with a
measurement abbreviation or higher number, thus ‘five birds’ but
‘5 km’ and ‘5-12 birds’; numerals are used for all numbers above
ten, four-figure numbers and above using the comma thus: ‘1,234’,
‘12,345’. Single quotation marks are to be used. Details of
experimental technique, extensive tabulations of results, etc., are
best presented as appendices.
Authors of papers containing statistical analysis should observe
the provisions of the relevant section of ‘Notice to contributors’
in a recent Ibis. Dates should be written 1 January 1985, times of
day as 08h30, 17h55 (24-hour clock), etc. When citing a
conversation (‘verbally’) or letter if in litt.’), the contact’s name
and initials should be included, preferably with the year of
communication. A full-length paper must include a summary not
exceeding 5% of the total length. Authors of papers are encouraged
to offer their work to one or more ornithologist or biologist for
critical assessment prior to submission to Forktail. Such help as is
received should naturally be mentioned in an acknowledgement
section before the full references are presented.
References in the text should follow the form ‘(Campbell and
Lack 1985)’ and ‘King et al. (1975) suggest...’. More than one
within the same parentheses should be chronologically listed,
alphabetically if of the same year. Publications by the same authors
in the same year may be distinguished by ‘a’, ‘b’, etc., after the
date. Full references must be listed alphabetically at the end in
the form:
Campbell, B. and Lack, E. eds. (1985) A dictionary of birds. Calton,
Staffordshire, U.K.: T. and A. D. Poyser.
King, B. F., Dickinson, E. C. and Woodcock, M.W. (1975) A
field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. London: Collins.
Kuroda, Nh., ed. (1984) Ketteiban seibutsu daizukan;chorui
[Illustrations of animals and plants: birds], Tokyo: Sekai
Bunkasha. (In Japanese.)
Rosljakov, G. E. (1985) [‘Information on the distribution and
numbers of Aix galericulata and Mergus squamatus over
Chabarovsk Territory.’] Pp. 101-102 in N. M. Litvinenko,
ed. Rare and endangered birds of the Far East. Vladivostok: Far
East Science Center, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. (In
Russian.)
Sien Yao-hua, Kuan Kuan-Hsun and Zheng Zuo-xin (1964) [‘An
avifaunal survey of the Chinghai province.’] Acta Zool. Sinica
16: 690-709. (In Chinese.)
Smythies, B. E. (1981) The birds of Romeo. Third edition. Kota
Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur: The Sabah Society and the
Malayan Nature Society.
Somadikarta, S. (1986) Collocalia linchi Horsfield & Moore - a
revision. Bull. Brit. Om. Club 106: 32-40.
White, C. M. N. and Bruce, M. D. (1986) The birds of Wallacea
(Sulawesi, the Moluccas and Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia) :
an annotated check-list. London: British Ornithologists’ Union
(Check-list no. 7).
It will be noted from these examples that references to non-
Roman scripts need to be transliterated and/or translated (or even,
with more recondite sources, both); either the transliterated title
may be left as it is, or a translation of it can be substituted in
square brackets (but where an abstract provides its own English
title, this may be cited in inverted commas within square brackets),
and the language involved should follow the reference, in
parentheses.
The author’s name, postal address and email address should
appear in italics at the end of the article.
Authors will receive proofs for checking, which they are
required to return within one week of receipt. All joint
communications must indicate the name and email address of the
author to whom proofs should be sent. Textual changes in proof
cannot normally be countenanced. Pdfs of the published pages
are available to authors on request.
.